524288 +++$+++ Frightner +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-07 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.189190940E09 +++$+++ You should look at all of the point on the template not just the last one, the template also says the image belonging to the republic of macedonia is in the public domain if it being used for \"information purposes\".  +++$+++ You should look at all of the point on the template not just the last one, the template also says the image belonging to the republic of macedonia is in the public domain if it being used for "information purposes". [[User:Frightner|Frightner]] 11:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
524289 +++$+++ Revizionist +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524288 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.189204860E09 +++$+++ Yes I agree. The law permits usage of documents, photographs and other materials for educational and informational purposes. There was a normative act issued by the government of the Republic of Macedonia that even allowed citizens to make photocopies or photograph rare archive materials.  +++$+++ :::Yes I agree. The law permits usage of documents, photographs and other materials for educational and informational purposes. There was a normative act issued by the government of the Republic of Macedonia that even allowed citizens to make photocopies or photograph rare archive materials. [[User:Revizionist|Revizionist]] 15:41, 07 September 2007 (UTC)

1 +++$+++ Johannes003 +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 1 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.310744280E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's good. Revathy's page looked very reliable, that's why we used that as a source.  +++$+++ Yes, that's good. Revathy's page looked very reliable, that's why we used that as a source. [[User:Johannes003|Johannes003]] ([[User talk:Johannes003|talk]]) 08:38, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
2 +++$+++ Johannes003 +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 1 +++$+++ 1 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.310746500E09 +++$+++ Nagma'a site, at least that filmography page, looks like taken from Wikipedia itself. I didn't remove it from time being, but I don't think it's true.  +++$+++ : Nagma'a site, at least that filmography page, looks like taken from Wikipedia itself. I didn't remove it from time being, but I don't think it's true. [[User:Johannes003|Johannes003]] ([[User talk:Johannes003|talk]]) 09:15, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
3 +++$+++ Johannes003 +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 1 +++$+++ 2 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 10:33:00 +++$+++ 1.310751180E09 +++$+++ I don't think there are many such official reliable sites left yet. The problem is most \"official sites\" are not really official, and often based on Wikipedia itself, and you don't know what to believe and what not. We used Madras Talkies' page, which is dead now. [http:\/\/kavithalayaa.com\/ Kavithalayaa]'s site is there, also AVM Production's site might be useful perhaps, but I can't enter that. Generally official sites of production houses seem to be very reliable ones.  +++$+++ :: I don't think there are many such official reliable sites left yet. The problem is most "official sites" are not really official, and often based on Wikipedia itself, and you don't know what to believe and what not. We used Madras Talkies' page, which is dead now. [http://kavithalayaa.com/ Kavithalayaa]'s site is there, also AVM Production's site might be useful perhaps, but I can't enter that. Generally official sites of production houses seem to be very reliable ones. [[User:Johannes003|Johannes003]] ([[User talk:Johannes003|talk]]) 10:33, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
4 +++$+++ Michael-Billa +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.311762120E09 +++$+++ Most of the so called \"official sites\" are maintained by fans or cinema based web companies. Not sure how reliable are they. <span style=\"color:green;font-size:small;;font-family:Segoe Print;\">-<i>B<\/i>iLLa-<\/span> +++$+++ :::: Most of the so called "official sites" are maintained by fans or cinema based web companies. Not sure how reliable are they. <span style="color:green;font-size:small;;font-family:Segoe Print;">-<i>B</i>iLLa-</span>[[User talk:Michael-Billa| <span style="color:green;font-size:small;;font-family:Segoe Print;">•<sup>talk</sup>•</span>]] 03:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

524290 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524290 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-07 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.189197960E09 +++$+++ You closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/J. Kevin Tumlinson]] after one day without mentioning anything about speedy deletion or giving reasons. Not that I'm objecting ''too'' much, but did you realize it was only one day? -- +++$+++ You closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Kevin Tumlinson]] after one day without mentioning anything about speedy deletion or giving reasons. Not that I'm objecting ''too'' much, but did you realize it was only one day? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:46, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
524291 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524290 +++$+++ 524290 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.189200660E09 +++$+++ Well, notability cannot be acquired in 4 days. That was my reasoning behind the early closure. However, if you still believe the closure was out of process, you can still refer to the deletion review. -  +++$+++ :Well, notability cannot be acquired in 4 days. That was my reasoning behind the early closure. However, if you still believe the closure was out of process, you can still refer to the deletion review. - [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up''® </sup></font>]]</small> 14:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
524292 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524290 +++$+++ 524291 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.189200720E09 +++$+++ No, no, I was the nominator! Just wanted to make sure it wasn't done in error. -- +++$+++ :: No, no, I was the nominator! Just wanted to make sure it wasn't done in error. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
524293 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524290 +++$+++ 524292 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.189200960E09 +++$+++ I was a bit surprised because i know you were the nominator ;) No, it wasn't done in error. -  +++$+++ ::: I was a bit surprised because i know you were the nominator ;) No, it wasn't done in error. - [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up''® </sup></font>]]</small> 14:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

262147 +++$+++ Venerock +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-03 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.286157240E09 +++$+++ Hello Dana, thanks for contribute in this [[Template:Spanish horses|template]], but i need tell you that is about horse, and balearic article is about a language of a people, if you think that im not right please tell me for not fixing the edit at last. Enjoy your day ;)-- +++$+++ Hello Dana, thanks for contribute in this [[Template:Spanish horses|template]], but i need tell you that is about horse, and balearic article is about a language of a people, if you think that im not right please tell me for not fixing the edit at last. Enjoy your day ;)--[[User:Venerock|Venerock]] ([[User talk:Venerock|talk]]) 18:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
262148 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262147 +++$+++ 262147 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.286157480E09 +++$+++ My apologies, I forgot to include the disambiguator. Please check now - it should be right. Thanks for letting me know.  +++$+++ :My apologies, I forgot to include the disambiguator. Please check now - it should be right. Thanks for letting me know. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 18:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

6 +++$+++ Johannes003 +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 6 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-30 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312057320E09 +++$+++ Hey, who said so? Frankly, I have absolutely no idea, sorry!  +++$+++ Hey, who said so? Frankly, I have absolutely no idea, sorry! [[User:Johannes003|Johannes003]] ([[User talk:Johannes003|talk]]) 13:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
7 +++$+++ Johannes003 +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 6 +++$+++ 6 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.312059420E09 +++$+++ Maybe, we should check out who added that, it could be some fanatic IP user. There will have been nominees, since there were nominees in earlier ceremonies and in the Telugu section, too, but how to find out? If there was a video coverage of that ceremony available we would know. Otherwise, I would remove it as it's unsourced.  +++$+++ : Maybe, we should check out who added that, it could be some fanatic IP user. There will have been nominees, since there were nominees in earlier ceremonies and in the Telugu section, too, but how to find out? If there was a video coverage of that ceremony available we would know. Otherwise, I would remove it as it's unsourced. [[User:Johannes003|Johannes003]] ([[User talk:Johannes003|talk]]) 13:57, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

262145 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262145 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-03 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.286127120E09 +++$+++ H  Dana, totally  amiss of me - belated congrats for  your promotion! I  voted for  you  without  any  hesitation. I'm  pleased to  hear from  Pike  that  you  might  be reviewing  the Finnhorse, I  can't  think  of anyone better for  the job. -- +++$+++ H  Dana, totally  amiss of me - belated congrats for  your promotion! I  voted for  you  without  any  hesitation. I'm  pleased to  hear from  Pike  that  you  might  be reviewing  the Finnhorse, I  can't  think  of anyone better for  the job. --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 10:32, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
262146 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262145 +++$+++ 262145 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.286133300E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much! I am going to try to take a look over Finnhorse - actually, I think I'll go start looking at it right now while I have a few minutes.  +++$+++ :Thank you very much! I am going to try to take a look over Finnhorse - actually, I think I'll go start looking at it right now while I have a few minutes. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 12:15, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

262152 +++$+++ Rms125a@hotmail.com +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-03 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.286163540E09 +++$+++ Hi. Just writing that you closed out the [[WP:CFD]] as a '''merge and delete''', but category appears open still at this moment. Yours,  +++$+++ Hi. Just writing that you closed out the [[WP:CFD]] as a '''merge and delete''', but category appears open still at this moment. Yours, [[User:Rms125a@hotmail.com|Rms125a@hotmail.com]] ([[User talk:Rms125a@hotmail.com|talk]]) 20:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
262153 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262152 +++$+++ 262152 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.286163600E09 +++$+++ Yes, I know. It's on the list at [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Working]], and the bot should get to it shortly.  +++$+++ :Yes, I know. It's on the list at [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Working]], and the bot should get to it shortly. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 20:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

9 +++$+++ Secret of success +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 9 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312136520E09 +++$+++ Well, no website is 100% perfect, you got to understand that. Are you saying TOI is an unreliable source? Mention of Shankar as Shankar Mahadevan might have been a mistake, I'll contact them and ask them to correct it. What else do you want me to do?  +++$+++ Well, no website is 100% perfect, you got to understand that. Are you saying TOI is an unreliable source? Mention of Shankar as Shankar Mahadevan might have been a mistake, I'll contact them and ask them to correct it. What else do you want me to do? [[User:Secret of success|Secret of success]] ([[User talk:Secret of success|talk]]) 11:22, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
10 +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 9 +++$+++ 9 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.312136820E09 +++$+++ I don't care. This is not the place to elevate your favourite Star's films. I'm not questioning about the credibility of TOI. There is a consensus not to add budget\/gross figures for any Indian movie, if it's speculated at a higher rate. I think you might be aware of the \"Enthiran issue\". Even official sources were not considered. -- +++$+++ : I don't care. This is not the place to elevate your favourite Star's films. I'm not questioning about the credibility of TOI. There is a consensus not to add budget/gross figures for any Indian movie, if it's speculated at a higher rate. I think you might be aware of the "Enthiran issue". Even official sources were not considered. --[[User:Vensatry|<span style="color:#556655"><small>'''Commander'''</small></span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Vensatry|<span style="color:#556655"><small>'''(Ping Me)'''</small></span>]]</sub> 11:27, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

262154 +++$+++ JCDenton2052 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-05 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.286272380E09 +++$+++ Could you restore Category:Second wave synthpop acts (or at least the bands formerly listed therein) to my userspace? I was checking out some of the bands and bookmarked it to check out some others later, but found that it was deleted. Thanks!  +++$+++ Could you restore Category:Second wave synthpop acts (or at least the bands formerly listed therein) to my userspace? I was checking out some of the bands and bookmarked it to check out some others later, but found that it was deleted. Thanks! [[User:JCDenton2052|JCDenton2052]] ([[User talk:JCDenton2052|talk]]) 02:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
262155 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262154 +++$+++ 262154 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.286272740E09 +++$+++ There would be nothing to restore, and categories can't be moved even if there were.  Category pages contain nothing, articles are added to it by an addition of code at the bottom of each article.  When a category is deleted, CFD has an Adminbot that goes through each article and removes the category.  The best you could do would be to find the edits in [[User:Cydebot]]'s contribution record, and then you'd be able to see what was in the category pre-deletion.  +++$+++ :There would be nothing to restore, and categories can't be moved even if there were.  Category pages contain nothing, articles are added to it by an addition of code at the bottom of each article.  When a category is deleted, CFD has an Adminbot that goes through each article and removes the category.  The best you could do would be to find the edits in [[User:Cydebot]]'s contribution record, and then you'd be able to see what was in the category pre-deletion. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 02:59, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
262156 +++$+++ JCDenton2052 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262154 +++$+++ 262155 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.286274420E09 +++$+++ Found them. Thanks for your help!  +++$+++ ::Found them. Thanks for your help! [[User:JCDenton2052|JCDenton2052]] ([[User talk:JCDenton2052|talk]]) 03:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

11 +++$+++ Karthikndr +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 11 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312143840E09 +++$+++ I agree i copied, even he mi8 know it very well. I dont know 2 design and all but some thing inside, i got my own work also. If u dont mind can i copy abit of urs. Even ur page looks good!!  +++$+++ I agree i copied, even he mi8 know it very well. I dont know 2 design and all but some thing inside, i got my own work also. If u dont mind can i copy abit of urs. Even ur page looks good!! [[User:Karthikndr|Karthik Nadar]] ([[User talk:Karthikndr|talk]]) 13:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
12 +++$+++ Karthikndr +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 11 +++$+++ 11 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.312146060E09 +++$+++ Ok! Ty for the info and links. Will create new design asap.  +++$+++ :Ok! Ty for the info and links. Will create new design asap. [[User:Karthikndr|Karthik Nadar]] ([[User talk:Karthikndr|talk]]) 14:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

13 +++$+++ Secret of success +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 13 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.312244220E09 +++$+++ I don't understand what you are saying. Could you please be more precise?  +++$+++ I don't understand what you are saying. Could you please be more precise? [[User:Secret of success|Secret of success]] ([[User talk:Secret of success|talk]]) 17:17, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
14 +++$+++ Secret of success +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 13 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312410120E09 +++$+++ Well, I have not made much significant contribution but just a couple of sections in one or two articles. If that is not enough, I have removed the template if that bothers you.  +++$+++ ::Well, I have not made much significant contribution but just a couple of sections in one or two articles. If that is not enough, I have removed the template if that bothers you. [[User:Secret of success|Secret of success]] ([[User talk:Secret of success|talk]]) 15:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

524302 +++$+++ Capricornis +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-10 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.189478460E09 +++$+++ If you look at the contrib history of Mr. Neutron you will find plenty of edits like this, and all of his 'contribs' are EXCLUSIVELY on articles dealing with Macedonia, and mostly pushing pro-bulgarian POV in subtle and not-so-subtle ways. I just thought you might want to know for future reference :)  +++$+++ If you look at the contrib history of Mr. Neutron you will find plenty of edits like this, and all of his 'contribs' are EXCLUSIVELY on articles dealing with Macedonia, and mostly pushing pro-bulgarian POV in subtle and not-so-subtle ways. I just thought you might want to know for future reference :) [[User:Capricornis|Capricornis]] 19:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
524303 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524302 +++$+++ 524302 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.189479180E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I understand that there is a lot of controversy here, even between respected scholars. We need to document that disagreement in our articles, hopefully without attacking editors. -- +++$+++ : Thanks. I understand that there is a lot of controversy here, even between respected scholars. We need to document that disagreement in our articles, hopefully without attacking editors. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 19:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
524304 +++$+++ Mr. Neutron +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524302 +++$+++ 524303 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.189480920E09 +++$+++ Capricornis, stop insinuating. And please refrain from various [[Ad hominem]] arguments, as they are falacies. Comment on contributions please.  +++$+++ ::Capricornis, stop insinuating. And please refrain from various [[Ad hominem]] arguments, as they are falacies. Comment on contributions please. [[User:Mr. Neutron|Mr. Neutron]] 20:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
524305 +++$+++ Capricornis +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524302 +++$+++ 524304 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.189489680E09 +++$+++ You must have misunderstood something? I was commenting on your contributions, not on you as a person (please read the Ad Hominem article before you quote it). Also 'insinuations' are statements that cannot be proven, whereas my statements above can be proven by anyone who will take the time to look through your contrib history. have a great day  +++$+++ ::: You must have misunderstood something? I was commenting on your contributions, not on you as a person (please read the Ad Hominem article before you quote it). Also 'insinuations' are statements that cannot be proven, whereas my statements above can be proven by anyone who will take the time to look through your contrib history. have a great day [[User:Capricornis|Capricornis]] 22:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
524306 +++$+++ Mr. Neutron +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524302 +++$+++ 524305 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.189490280E09 +++$+++ You were already warned on your talkpage not to commit any more personal attacks, so dont do it. You have been consistently insinuating against other Wikipedia contributors and this is not at all nice going.  +++$+++ ::::You were already warned on your talkpage not to commit any more personal attacks, so dont do it. You have been consistently insinuating against other Wikipedia contributors and this is not at all nice going. [[User:Mr. Neutron|Mr. Neutron]] 22:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
524307 +++$+++ Capricornis +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524302 +++$+++ 524306 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.189491480E09 +++$+++ You are talking about the distant past. I retracted the unfortunate comments and they were accepted, including by you, at the end of this section http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Ilinden-Preobrazhenie_Uprising#Search_engines_tests . I do not intend to personally attack you at all, but I will attack your contributions and 'content' every time you try to 'slightly' swing the pendulum to your side - you will be reported.  +++$+++ ::::: You are talking about the distant past. I retracted the unfortunate comments and they were accepted, including by you, at the end of this section http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ilinden-Preobrazhenie_Uprising#Search_engines_tests . I do not intend to personally attack you at all, but I will attack your contributions and 'content' every time you try to 'slightly' swing the pendulum to your side - you will be reported. [[User:Capricornis|Capricornis]] 23:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
524308 +++$+++ Mr. Neutron +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524302 +++$+++ 524307 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.189493820E09 +++$+++ Oh please! \"Distant past\" was only [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Capricornis&diff=156856515&oldid=156665242 yesterday]. Report whatever you want, with such consistent agenda against other contributors you only bring suspicion on yourself.  +++$+++ ::::::Oh please! "Distant past" was only [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Capricornis&diff=156856515&oldid=156665242 yesterday]. Report whatever you want, with such consistent agenda against other contributors you only bring suspicion on yourself. [[User:Mr. Neutron|Mr. Neutron]] 23:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
524309 +++$+++ Capricornis +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524302 +++$+++ 524308 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.189501860E09 +++$+++ That was a misinformed suggestion by another ordinary user, just like you and me. I still maintain that there were no personal attacks in my words, but only good humored jibs. The statement about the exclusivity of your activity on Macedonia related articles stands and is easily verifiable. I suggest if you have something more to say, to do it on my talk page as there is no point continuing this tirade on AnonEMouse's page who seems to have quite enough work without it. -cheers  +++$+++ ::::::: That was a misinformed suggestion by another ordinary user, just like you and me. I still maintain that there were no personal attacks in my words, but only good humored jibs. The statement about the exclusivity of your activity on Macedonia related articles stands and is easily verifiable. I suggest if you have something more to say, to do it on my talk page as there is no point continuing this tirade on AnonEMouse's page who seems to have quite enough work without it. -cheers [[User:Capricornis|Capricornis]] 02:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
524310 +++$+++ Mr. Neutron +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524302 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.189502040E09 +++$+++ And more personal attacks calling people misinformed...  +++$+++ :::::::::And more personal attacks calling people misinformed... [[User:Mr. Neutron|Mr. Neutron]] 02:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
524311 +++$+++ Capricornis +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524302 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.189502280E09 +++$+++ Misinformed\/misguided are not insults in the English language. Maybe brush up on your English or use [[Websters]]? :)  +++$+++ :::::::::: Misinformed/misguided are not insults in the English language. Maybe brush up on your English or use [[Websters]]? :) [[User:Capricornis|Capricornis]] 02:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

16 +++$+++ Secret of success +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 16 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.312588320E09 +++$+++ Hi. I think your statement of the ip being the sockpuppet of sreekar akkineni is true. Earlier, a user named Niranjaniyengar(who was a sock of sreekar akkineni) wrote on my talk page in a similar manner. If you can trace the ip used by them, it would be possible to block him. I also have a doubt if Mr. Kollyfan, famed for his discussion of the Enthiran gross has something to do with this. It would throw some light on this manner. Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi. I think your statement of the ip being the sockpuppet of sreekar akkineni is true. Earlier, a user named Niranjaniyengar(who was a sock of sreekar akkineni) wrote on my talk page in a similar manner. If you can trace the ip used by them, it would be possible to block him. I also have a doubt if Mr. Kollyfan, famed for his discussion of the Enthiran gross has something to do with this. It would throw some light on this manner. Thanks! [[User:Secret of success|Secret of success]] ([[User talk:Secret of success|talk]]) 16:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
17 +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 16 +++$+++ 16 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.312588860E09 +++$+++ Glad that you got my point. Actually Sreekarakkineni, Niranjaniyengar and this IP seems like the same person. Will file a case soon.-- +++$+++ :Glad that you got my point. Actually Sreekarakkineni, Niranjaniyengar and this IP seems like the same person. Will file a case soon.--[[User:Vensatry|<span style="color:#556655"><small>'''Commander'''</small></span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Vensatry|<span style="color:#556655"><small>'''(Ping Me)'''</small></span>]]</sub> 17:01, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
18 +++$+++ Bollyjeff +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ 16 +++$+++ 17 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312590060E09 +++$+++ So put in a sock puppet investigation to find out.  +++$+++ ::So put in a sock puppet investigation to find out. [[User:Bollyjeff|<span style="color:blue">'''BollyJeff'''</span>]] <span style="color:green">||</span> [[User talk:Bollyjeff|<span style="color:red">'''''talk'''''</span>]] 17:21, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

262162 +++$+++ Explicit +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262162 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-09 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.286691180E09 +++$+++ Hi there Dana, when relisting CFD discussions, please be aware that we don't remove the discussions from one log date to the other; instead, we close the discussion at add the {{tl|Relisted}} template instead. As such, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2010_September_26&diff=389785157&oldid=389782135 this] edit should be reverted and the discussions should be closed. This is explained at [[WP:RELIST]], last line. Thanks. \u2014  +++$+++ Hi there Dana, when relisting CFD discussions, please be aware that we don't remove the discussions from one log date to the other; instead, we close the discussion at add the {{tl|Relisted}} template instead. As such, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_September_26&diff=389785157&oldid=389782135 this] edit should be reverted and the discussions should be closed. This is explained at [[WP:RELIST]], last line. Thanks. — [[User:Explicit|<font color="008080">'''ξ'''</font>]][[User talk:Explicit|<font color="000000"><sup>xplicit</sup></font>]] 23:13, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
262163 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262162 +++$+++ 262162 +++$+++ 2010-10-10 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.286701080E09 +++$+++ Whoops, my apologies. I apparently read the bolded part and completely missed the part in parentheses. Thanks for letting me know - please let me know if there is anything else I'm doing wrong: I'm new at it, but the backlog needs work so I wanted to chip in. I'll go fix that now.  +++$+++ :Whoops, my apologies. I apparently read the bolded part and completely missed the part in parentheses. Thanks for letting me know - please let me know if there is anything else I'm doing wrong: I'm new at it, but the backlog needs work so I wanted to chip in. I'll go fix that now. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 01:58, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
262164 +++$+++ Good Olfactory +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262162 +++$+++ 262162 +++$+++ 2010-10-11 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.286793420E09 +++$+++ And just one other note, Dana\u2014after you relist a CFD, don't forget to change the date on the cfd tag on the category itself so that it goes to the new discussion, like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Category%3AChristmas_number-one_singles_in_the_United_Kingdom&action=historysubmit&diff=389999136&oldid=387262711 this]. Thanks for you service in working on closing CFDs; we are always looking for more help and attention with these.  +++$+++ *And just one other note, Dana—after you relist a CFD, don't forget to change the date on the cfd tag on the category itself so that it goes to the new discussion, like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3AChristmas_number-one_singles_in_the_United_Kingdom&action=historysubmit&diff=389999136&oldid=387262711 this]. Thanks for you service in working on closing CFDs; we are always looking for more help and attention with these. [[User:Good Olfactory|Good Ol’factory]] <sup>[[User talk:Good Olfactory|(talk)]]</sup> 03:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

20 +++$+++ Leahtwosaints +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 20 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.300422840E09 +++$+++ Hey! Hi -There are a bunch of things I want to learn here in [[Wikipedia]]. Only you, and maybe 3 others could teach me (terribly embarrassing to admit I'm so ignorant with computers, etc.) and so I've decided to send a couple notes and the others for help. Is it OK to email you, to save space on our talk pages? Mine is activated too. This drives me crazy! One burning question has to do with many [[Grateful Dead]]-related articles, so I am here. Nearly all the biography articles about [[musician]]s eventually have a Discography section, followed by References, and then External links. Some of them have a \"see also\" section which is essentially [[trivia]], and it is simple enough to see if it's warranted or not. However, what I don't understand is a \"Notes\" section. What purpose, exactly does it serve, and how do you put info into the text properly to acheive whatever result the editor is trying to accomplish? It's really perplexing. -- +++$+++ Hey! Hi -There are a bunch of things I want to learn here in [[Wikipedia]]. Only you, and maybe 3 others could teach me (terribly embarrassing to admit I'm so ignorant with computers, etc.) and so I've decided to send a couple notes and the others for help. Is it OK to email you, to save space on our talk pages? Mine is activated too. This drives me crazy! One burning question has to do with many [[Grateful Dead]]-related articles, so I am here. Nearly all the biography articles about [[musician]]s eventually have a Discography section, followed by References, and then External links. Some of them have a "see also" section which is essentially [[trivia]], and it is simple enough to see if it's warranted or not. However, what I don't understand is a "Notes" section. What purpose, exactly does it serve, and how do you put info into the text properly to acheive whatever result the editor is trying to accomplish? It's really perplexing. --[[User:Leahtwosaints|Leahtwosaints]] ([[User talk:Leahtwosaints|talk]]) 21:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
21 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 20 +++$+++ 20 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.300432800E09 +++$+++ Let me know how that goes.  Being able to format footnotes is a big plus, and like I said it's pretty easy once you've done it a few times.  I suggest that you try doing a few on your user page, or on a sub-page of your user page, for practice.  If you want more help just let me know. <font face=\"cursive\">\u2014  +++$+++ :Let me know how that goes.  Being able to format footnotes is a big plus, and like I said it's pretty easy once you've done it a few times.  I suggest that you try doing a few on your user page, or on a sub-page of your user page, for practice.  If you want more help just let me know. <font face="cursive">— [[User:Mudwater|Mudwater]]<small><sup> ([[User talk:Mudwater|Talk]])</sup></small></font> 00:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

262165 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262165 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-11 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.286798880E09 +++$+++ I think you should nag MF. He never responds to my nags :P ''' +++$+++ I think you should nag MF. He never responds to my nags :P '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey#Photo_poll|<font color="#FA8605">new photo poll]]''</font>)  05:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
262166 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262165 +++$+++ 262165 +++$+++ 2010-10-11 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.286830500E09 +++$+++ I dropped notes to half a dozen editors on various articles already in the FARC stage. We'll see if it gets us anywhere.  +++$+++ :I dropped notes to half a dozen editors on various articles already in the FARC stage. We'll see if it gets us anywhere. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 13:55, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
262167 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262165 +++$+++ 262166 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.286867700E09 +++$+++ Outofsinc on British Empire is a sock\/meat, quite obviously ''' +++$+++ ::Outofsinc on British Empire is a sock/meat, quite obviously '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey#Photo_poll|<font color="#FA8605">new photo poll]]''</font>)  00:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

22 +++$+++ Leahtwosaints +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 22 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-20 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.303346700E09 +++$+++ My apologies when I come trampling through your pet projects-- further from my mind to annoy you, seriously.  However, I keep seeing (esp. in [[jazz]] related articles) people interchanging sections listed as \"References\", \"Notes\", \"Footnotes\" \"External links\", and I've even seen (whilst editing) a \"Reflist 2\". Frankly, I'm baffled. I've pretty much stuck to the editing of [[musician]]s and generally, the articles are [[biography|biographical]] and I stick to the typical lead per [[WP:MOS]] (which I admit I never really read too deeply). Usually, at the end of an  article, there's the [[discography]] and the <nowiki>references section, followed by External links<\/nowiki> and often the latter is jam-packed with link farms that are longer than the article themselves. Can you explain to me how this works, with the Notes and all? OH, and feel free to revert my edits when they are done improperly. Sorry about messing up articles that I only want to help! -- +++$+++ My apologies when I come trampling through your pet projects-- further from my mind to annoy you, seriously.  However, I keep seeing (esp. in [[jazz]] related articles) people interchanging sections listed as "References", "Notes", "Footnotes" "External links", and I've even seen (whilst editing) a "Reflist 2". Frankly, I'm baffled. I've pretty much stuck to the editing of [[musician]]s and generally, the articles are [[biography|biographical]] and I stick to the typical lead per [[WP:MOS]] (which I admit I never really read too deeply). Usually, at the end of an  article, there's the [[discography]] and the <nowiki>references section, followed by External links</nowiki> and often the latter is jam-packed with link farms that are longer than the article themselves. Can you explain to me how this works, with the Notes and all? OH, and feel free to revert my edits when they are done improperly. Sorry about messing up articles that I only want to help! --[[User:Leahtwosaints|Leahtwosaints]] ([[User talk:Leahtwosaints|talk]]) 17:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
23 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 22 +++$+++ 22 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.303611720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note.  Yes, I think a lot of editors are a bit confused about Notes, References, and External links sections.  Take a look at what I wrote at [[User talk:Mudwater#Notes and other things]], and at [[Talk:Skip Battin#Place references here]], for some helpful info.  On some articles, most or all of the External links section should really be in the References section.  But it's important not to remove reliable references from articles.  Feel free to reply here if you want to talk about this some more.  <font face=\"cursive\">\u2014  +++$+++ :Thanks for the note.  Yes, I think a lot of editors are a bit confused about Notes, References, and External links sections.  Take a look at what I wrote at [[User talk:Mudwater#Notes and other things]], and at [[Talk:Skip Battin#Place references here]], for some helpful info.  On some articles, most or all of the External links section should really be in the References section.  But it's important not to remove reliable references from articles.  Feel free to reply here if you want to talk about this some more.  <font face="cursive">— [[User:Mudwater|Mudwater]]<small><sup> ([[User talk:Mudwater|Talk]])</sup></small></font> 19:22, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
24 +++$+++ Leahtwosaints +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 22 +++$+++ 23 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.303737480E09 +++$+++ OK, I'll have a look at it. Partly, one reason why I'm not a first class editor has some to do with [[ADD]] (or laziness, take your pick) which explains my difficulty with [[punctuation]] as well.. anyway, like I said, never feel bad about reverting my work, too. -- +++$+++ ::OK, I'll have a look at it. Partly, one reason why I'm not a first class editor has some to do with [[ADD]] (or laziness, take your pick) which explains my difficulty with [[punctuation]] as well.. anyway, like I said, never feel bad about reverting my work, too. --[[User:Leahtwosaints|Leahtwosaints]] ([[User talk:Leahtwosaints|talk]]) 06:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

262168 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-12 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.286894160E09 +++$+++ Can you please see [[Wikipedia talk:Featured article review\/Simon Byrne\/archive1#Breaking_up_other_users'_posts]], and help out with regard to this disruption? Thank you for your time, -- ''' +++$+++ Can you please see [[Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Simon Byrne/archive1#Breaking_up_other_users'_posts]], and help out with regard to this disruption? Thank you for your time, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:36, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
262169 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262168 +++$+++ 262168 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.286910720E09 +++$+++ Responded to you, at [[Wikipedia talk:Featured article review\/Simon Byrne\/archive1]]. -- ''' +++$+++ :Responded to you, at [[Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Simon Byrne/archive1]]. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 12:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
262170 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262168 +++$+++ 262169 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.286911800E09 +++$+++ Seems fixed now. -- ''' +++$+++ ::Seems fixed now. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 12:30, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

524313 +++$+++ Mandsford +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524313 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-10 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.189486980E09 +++$+++ Who wrote the Joe Schmidlap article?  I had a friend who referenced that name regularly, and was surprised to see it in print.  Thanks for any info you can provide.   +++$+++ Who wrote the Joe Schmidlap article?  I had a friend who referenced that name regularly, and was surprised to see it in print.  Thanks for any info you can provide.  [[User:Mandsford|Mandsford]] 22:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
524314 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524313 +++$+++ 524313 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.189539780E09 +++$+++ [[User:ManualRivera791]] was the proud author, but it's a common enough insert-name-here name, just [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=Joe+Schmidlap ask Google]. Joe Schmoe is another; John Q. Public; John Doe in legal cases; Joe Bloggs on standardized tests; Bubba... -- +++$+++ : [[User:ManualRivera791]] was the proud author, but it's a common enough insert-name-here name, just [http://www.google.com/search?q=Joe+Schmidlap ask Google]. Joe Schmoe is another; John Q. Public; John Doe in legal cases; Joe Bloggs on standardized tests; Bubba... --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 12:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

26 +++$+++ Anetode +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 26 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-24 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.303643760E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on <span class=\"plainlinks\">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target=Mudwater&namespace=6}} this link]<\/span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria|non-free content policy]].  If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice --> \u02c9\u02c9<sup> +++$+++ If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target=Mudwater&namespace=6}} this link]</span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria|non-free content policy]].  If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice --> ˉˉ<sup>[[User:Anetode|'''anetode''']]</sup>[[User_talk:Anetode|╦╩]] 04:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
27 +++$+++ Leahtwosaints +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 26 +++$+++ 26 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.304301000E09 +++$+++ Second, last but not least, There's an '''Rfa''' for [[User:Catfish Jim and the soapdish]], one of the handful of editors who, like you, have consistently been a help and inspiration. I hope you'll take a look: [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Catfish Jim and the soapdish]] Please, vote with your heart. Thanks as always. -- +++$+++ :Second, last but not least, There's an '''Rfa''' for [[User:Catfish Jim and the soapdish]], one of the handful of editors who, like you, have consistently been a help and inspiration. I hope you'll take a look: [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Catfish Jim and the soapdish]] Please, vote with your heart. Thanks as always. --[[User:Leahtwosaints|Leahtwosaints]] ([[User talk:Leahtwosaints|talk]]) 18:50, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
28 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 26 +++$+++ 27 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.304837580E09 +++$+++ As far as the [[Scott Gorham]] article, that's just a classic case of an article that doesn't have enough references.  But it looks like someone has added more references since you posted about it here on my talk page.  I might add a few more myself if I get around to it.  In general, I'd say don't get too hung up about the technical details of naming the sections, or the best way to format references.  The most important things are to expand and improve the text of existing articles, and to add reliable references that you find, either on the internet or offline.  I happen to be interested in a lot of the technical details myself, as I've explained a bit here on my talk page, but if you find it confusing, don't worry about it.  The content is the most important thing, someone can always come along later and fix the formatting.  \"P.S.\" Looks like your buddy made admin, congratulations to him (or her). <font face=\"cursive\">\u2014  +++$+++ ::As far as the [[Scott Gorham]] article, that's just a classic case of an article that doesn't have enough references.  But it looks like someone has added more references since you posted about it here on my talk page.  I might add a few more myself if I get around to it.  In general, I'd say don't get too hung up about the technical details of naming the sections, or the best way to format references.  The most important things are to expand and improve the text of existing articles, and to add reliable references that you find, either on the internet or offline.  I happen to be interested in a lot of the technical details myself, as I've explained a bit here on my talk page, but if you find it confusing, don't worry about it.  The content is the most important thing, someone can always come along later and fix the formatting.  "P.S." Looks like your buddy made admin, congratulations to him (or her). <font face="cursive">— [[User:Mudwater|Mudwater]]<small><sup> ([[User talk:Mudwater|Talk]])</sup></small></font> 23:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
29 +++$+++ Leahtwosaints +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 26 +++$+++ 28 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.305304320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the response. OK, then. The editor who just brought [[Thin Lizzy]] to GA status becomes more motivated with the Thin Lizzy related articles (like [[Scott Gorham]]) when I bring in new photos that are good. If there isn't enough text to place the article, it doesn't work, and he's good that way.. like the photo for [[Bo Diddley]] and [[Eric Bell]].. so that must be him. Oh, and as for [[User:Catfish Jim and the soapdish]]'s Rfa, it is good! I was really surprised to hear he jumped into the ring of fire without my knowing he planned to do it.. he said he didn't want to look like he might be fishing for votes, which just goes to show what a decent guy he is.. not to mention all those positive votes, and I think, 2 votes not for his Adminship, which is a really decent outcome! I thought you knew him already. You may benefit from doing so. He's been so helpful to me over the last year or so, and is a good editor as well as good at sniffing out vandalism, which is why he finally asked for the mop-- more tools in which to deal with those problems. I'm glad for him! I'll only vote in an Rfa if I ''really'' know the individual, so it's just been three times altogether. -- +++$+++ :::Thanks for the response. OK, then. The editor who just brought [[Thin Lizzy]] to GA status becomes more motivated with the Thin Lizzy related articles (like [[Scott Gorham]]) when I bring in new photos that are good. If there isn't enough text to place the article, it doesn't work, and he's good that way.. like the photo for [[Bo Diddley]] and [[Eric Bell]].. so that must be him. Oh, and as for [[User:Catfish Jim and the soapdish]]'s Rfa, it is good! I was really surprised to hear he jumped into the ring of fire without my knowing he planned to do it.. he said he didn't want to look like he might be fishing for votes, which just goes to show what a decent guy he is.. not to mention all those positive votes, and I think, 2 votes not for his Adminship, which is a really decent outcome! I thought you knew him already. You may benefit from doing so. He's been so helpful to me over the last year or so, and is a good editor as well as good at sniffing out vandalism, which is why he finally asked for the mop-- more tools in which to deal with those problems. I'm glad for him! I'll only vote in an Rfa if I ''really'' know the individual, so it's just been three times altogether. --[[User:Leahtwosaints|Leahtwosaints]] ([[User talk:Leahtwosaints|talk]]) 09:32, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

524315 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-11 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.189552920E09 +++$+++ AnonEMouse, when you get a chance could you take a look at the material Jamesd1 has added to the article? My view is that much of it is nothing but original research....for instance, the section comparing Bailey's writing to Theosophical Society literature which is based on nothing but Bailey quotes and links that do not even mention Bailey, all held together by original research of Jamesd1. If you think I am wrong, I will not bother the others editors on this point. (thanks for making the spelling correction)  +++$+++ AnonEMouse, when you get a chance could you take a look at the material Jamesd1 has added to the article? My view is that much of it is nothing but original research....for instance, the section comparing Bailey's writing to Theosophical Society literature which is based on nothing but Bailey quotes and links that do not even mention Bailey, all held together by original research of Jamesd1. If you think I am wrong, I will not bother the others editors on this point. (thanks for making the spelling correction) [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 16:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
524316 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524315 +++$+++ 524315 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.189557480E09 +++$+++ As an editing rule here, it's better to add to people's edits, rephrase, rearrange, etc., rather than remove their changes wholesale. That way there is some back and forth, but in general a kind of incremental progress, and the article improves. Just reverting leads to deadlock, and should be avoided. Don't insist on perfection all at once. When you find something wrong, fix it, but don't just delete it unless there really is no other choice. -- +++$+++ : As an editing rule here, it's better to add to people's edits, rephrase, rearrange, etc., rather than remove their changes wholesale. That way there is some back and forth, but in general a kind of incremental progress, and the article improves. Just reverting leads to deadlock, and should be avoided. Don't insist on perfection all at once. When you find something wrong, fix it, but don't just delete it unless there really is no other choice. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

262173 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-13 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.287010080E09 +++$+++ How can the FAR notice be removed from [[chess]]?  I commented it out on the talk page, but it stills says \"review\" on the article page.   +++$+++ How can the FAR notice be removed from [[chess]]?  I commented it out on the talk page, but it stills says "review" on the article page.  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] <sup>[[User talk:Bubba73|You talkin' to me?]]</sup> 15:48, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
262174 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262173 +++$+++ 262173 +++$+++ 2010-10-13 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.287010980E09 +++$+++ The bot will come through and close the review in a while (the schedule tends to be Wednesday and Saturday nights, but this varies sometimes). I'm going to uncomment the tag on the talk page so that it doesn't screw up the bot.  +++$+++ :The bot will come through and close the review in a while (the schedule tends to be Wednesday and Saturday nights, but this varies sometimes). I'm going to uncomment the tag on the talk page so that it doesn't screw up the bot. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 16:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

30 +++$+++ Jax 0677 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 30 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-21 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.305965820E09 +++$+++ It doesn't look like we're getting much feedback on splitting the \"Gun laws in the United States (by state)\" article.  I posted notices on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Law|WikiProject Law]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States|WikiProject United States]], to no avail.-- +++$+++ It doesn't look like we're getting much feedback on splitting the "Gun laws in the United States (by state)" article.  I posted notices on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Law|WikiProject Law]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States|WikiProject United States]], to no avail.--[[User:Jax 0677|Jax 0677]] ([[User talk:Jax 0677|talk]]) 01:17, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
31 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 30 +++$+++ 30 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.305966720E09 +++$+++ I agree, not much feedback so far.  Seven editors have commented, including you and me.  And one of the seven also posted about it on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Firearms|WikiProject Firearms]]. <font face=\"cursive\">\u2014  +++$+++ :I agree, not much feedback so far.  Seven editors have commented, including you and me.  And one of the seven also posted about it on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Firearms|WikiProject Firearms]]. <font face="cursive">— [[User:Mudwater|Mudwater]]<small><sup> ([[User talk:Mudwater|Talk]])</sup></small></font> 01:32, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

32 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 32 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-24 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.306266540E09 +++$+++ Hi. :) I appreciate all your work in that article and particularly in your diplomatic resolution to the nationality question. Mr. Cage would like us to set the record straight, and he's provided us with a published source so that we can. I've added that his nationality is American. (It's kind an irritable blog entry, but it contains some other biographical information that you might like to incorporate: [http:\/\/www.roadcage.com\/?p=60].) I just wanted to ask you, if you happen to be continuing to maintain the article as you so ably have in the past, to kind of keep an eye out for the return of Canadianism, if it should show up. Mr. Cage vigorously contests its accuracy. -- +++$+++ Hi. :) I appreciate all your work in that article and particularly in your diplomatic resolution to the nationality question. Mr. Cage would like us to set the record straight, and he's provided us with a published source so that we can. I've added that his nationality is American. (It's kind an irritable blog entry, but it contains some other biographical information that you might like to incorporate: [http://www.roadcage.com/?p=60].) I just wanted to ask you, if you happen to be continuing to maintain the article as you so ably have in the past, to kind of keep an eye out for the return of Canadianism, if it should show up. Mr. Cage vigorously contests its accuracy. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 12:49, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
33 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 32 +++$+++ 32 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.306267560E09 +++$+++ Wow, this is great.  And I love Mr. Cage's explanation of his situation, and his views on the Wikipedia process from the perspective of being the subject of an article.  Thanks very much for your help with this!  <font face=\"cursive\">\u2014  +++$+++ :Wow, this is great.  And I love Mr. Cage's explanation of his situation, and his views on the Wikipedia process from the perspective of being the subject of an article.  Thanks very much for your help with this!  <font face="cursive">— [[User:Mudwater|Mudwater]]<small><sup> ([[User talk:Mudwater|Talk]])</sup></small></font> 13:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

262177 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-18 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.287453960E09 +++$+++ Dana, [[Wikipedia talk:Featured article review\/World Science Festival\/archive1|this was an incorrect (bad) hack]] that occurred at FAR and only came to my attention because an error was made in the ''Signpost'', indicating the FA had been delisted.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost\/2010-10-18\/Features_and_admins&diff=prev&oldid=391348494]  When I went to check, I found that 2009 content had simply been deleted,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=World_Science_Festival,_2008&diff=386458978&oldid=386458738] and the main article (notable) had gone away via a redirect to a [[World Science Festival, 2008|2008 article]].  I have done a partial cleanup, but more work is likely needed-- specifically, I don't know what else may have been deleted during the FAR, and what improvements from the 2008 version need to be restored to the main article.  I will leave a note for {{user|Dank}} and direct him to this conversation. The main article will need review to restore any changes made since 2008.  Someone else may want to update the main article to include 2010 and 2011, which are mentioned in the Festival website.  There are also dead links at the 2008 article that should have been picked up on the FAR.   +++$+++ Dana, [[Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/World Science Festival/archive1|this was an incorrect (bad) hack]] that occurred at FAR and only came to my attention because an error was made in the ''Signpost'', indicating the FA had been delisted.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-10-18/Features_and_admins&diff=prev&oldid=391348494]  When I went to check, I found that 2009 content had simply been deleted,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_Science_Festival,_2008&diff=386458978&oldid=386458738] and the main article (notable) had gone away via a redirect to a [[World Science Festival, 2008|2008 article]].  I have done a partial cleanup, but more work is likely needed-- specifically, I don't know what else may have been deleted during the FAR, and what improvements from the 2008 version need to be restored to the main article.  I will leave a note for {{user|Dank}} and direct him to this conversation. The main article will need review to restore any changes made since 2008.  Someone else may want to update the main article to include 2010 and 2011, which are mentioned in the Festival website.  There are also dead links at the 2008 article that should have been picked up on the FAR.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:06, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
262178 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262177 +++$+++ 262177 +++$+++ 2010-10-18 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.287467340E09 +++$+++ You are correct that the main WSF article should exist and include information from all of the years. However, all of the reviewers (including Malleus!) agreed that the WSF 2008 article met FA standards. Most of the dead link tags were invalid - I've removed those and fixed the couple of valid ones. Easy enough. The 2009 info was the only stuff deleted (AFAIK) during the FAR, but I'm not sure what you mean by the \"improvements from the 2008 version need to be restored to the main article\".  +++$+++ :You are correct that the main WSF article should exist and include information from all of the years. However, all of the reviewers (including Malleus!) agreed that the WSF 2008 article met FA standards. Most of the dead link tags were invalid - I've removed those and fixed the couple of valid ones. Easy enough. The 2009 info was the only stuff deleted (AFAIK) during the FAR, but I'm not sure what you mean by the "improvements from the 2008 version need to be restored to the main article". [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
262179 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262177 +++$+++ 262178 +++$+++ 2010-10-18 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.287467520E09 +++$+++ I dunno-- I may have confused myself between the two versions, but I think it's all up to snuff now!  Thanks!  I was surprised by that FAR :)   +++$+++ :: I dunno-- I may have confused myself between the two versions, but I think it's all up to snuff now!  Thanks!  I was surprised by that FAR :)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

34 +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 34 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-16 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.308218820E09 +++$+++ Hey, I noticed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Garcia_(album)&diff=prev&oldid=434347681 this] yesterday and was wondering if the 24.2ems should be made part of the actual template. There was a discussion on this a short while ago on the template's talk page, but I didn't think it was possible. Didn't occur to me to try decimals. \u2013&nbsp;<font color=\"#06266f\">Ker\u03b1u<\/font><font color=\"#1240AB\">no\u03c2co<\/font><font color=\"#4671DS\">pia<\/font><font color=\"#A60000\"><sup>\u25c1<\/sup><\/font><i><sub><font color=\"#5E1FFF\"> +++$+++ Hey, I noticed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garcia_(album)&diff=prev&oldid=434347681 this] yesterday and was wondering if the 24.2ems should be made part of the actual template. There was a discussion on this a short while ago on the template's talk page, but I didn't think it was possible. Didn't occur to me to try decimals. –&nbsp;<font color="#06266f">Kerαu</font><font color="#1240AB">noςco</font><font color="#4671DS">pia</font><font color="#A60000"><sup>◁</sup></font><i><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User:Keraunoscopia|gala]][[User talk:Keraunoscopia|xies]]</font></sub></i> 03:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
35 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 34 +++$+++ 34 +++$+++ 2011-06-16 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.308219120E09 +++$+++ I missed that discussion, but I definitely think it would be very good if the default width of the template was 24.2, so that it would be (I think) the same width as the infobox.  (And as an additional point, I would also favor making \"state=plain\" the default.)  <font face=\"cursive\">\u2014  +++$+++ :I missed that discussion, but I definitely think it would be very good if the default width of the template was 24.2, so that it would be (I think) the same width as the infobox.  (And as an additional point, I would also favor making "state=plain" the default.)  <font face="cursive">— [[User:Mudwater|Mudwater]]<small><sup> ([[User talk:Mudwater|Talk]])</sup></small></font> 03:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
36 +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 34 +++$+++ 35 +++$+++ 2011-06-16 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.308219240E09 +++$+++ I'm not familiar enough with the states thing, but here's the discussion: [[Template_talk:Album_ratings#Width]]. It's not very old at all. I would support the 24.2. \u2013&nbsp;<font color=\"#06266f\">Ker\u03b1u<\/font><font color=\"#1240AB\">no\u03c2co<\/font><font color=\"#4671DS\">pia<\/font><font color=\"#A60000\"><sup>\u25c1<\/sup><\/font><i><sub><font color=\"#5E1FFF\"> +++$+++ ::I'm not familiar enough with the states thing, but here's the discussion: [[Template_talk:Album_ratings#Width]]. It's not very old at all. I would support the 24.2. –&nbsp;<font color="#06266f">Kerαu</font><font color="#1240AB">noςco</font><font color="#4671DS">pia</font><font color="#A60000"><sup>◁</sup></font><i><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User:Keraunoscopia|gala]][[User talk:Keraunoscopia|xies]]</font></sub></i> 03:14, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
37 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 34 +++$+++ 36 +++$+++ 2011-06-16 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.308219660E09 +++$+++ I was wondering if the widths of the infobox and the album ratings template would vary by browser and\/or by skin, but I didn't try to figure that out.  It sounds like they do.  But I think that using 24.2em would make them the same width for most readers, so I would still favor that.  As for \"state\", that's explained on the [[:Template:Album ratings]] page.  In my opinion \"state=plain\" would be the best default, because it displays the ratings without the options to hide or show them.  In most cases having the option is an unnecessary complication, in my view. <font face=\"cursive\">\u2014  +++$+++ :::I was wondering if the widths of the infobox and the album ratings template would vary by browser and/or by skin, but I didn't try to figure that out.  It sounds like they do.  But I think that using 24.2em would make them the same width for most readers, so I would still favor that.  As for "state", that's explained on the [[:Template:Album ratings]] page.  In my opinion "state=plain" would be the best default, because it displays the ratings without the options to hide or show them.  In most cases having the option is an unnecessary complication, in my view. <font face="cursive">— [[User:Mudwater|Mudwater]]<small><sup> ([[User talk:Mudwater|Talk]])</sup></small></font> 03:21, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
38 +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 34 +++$+++ 37 +++$+++ 2011-06-16 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.308220200E09 +++$+++ Oh, I remember states now. Yeah, not sure why one would collapse the template at all. Kind of a silly option. Well, when I messed around with ems, they varied between skins (I tried Vector, and I always use Modern, otherwise), and I'm using Safari for a browser, and your 24.2 thing looked fine on Safari\/skin=Modern, so I assume you've figured out the secret width needed. Not sure how well it would work, but you could always put an infobox and the album ratings template on an otherwise-empty sandbox, then throw that URL into [http:\/\/browsershots.org\/ browsershots.org] and see if the widths vary from browser to browser. They'd all be in Vector (default) skin, I think. \u2013&nbsp;<font color=\"#06266f\">Ker\u03b1u<\/font><font color=\"#1240AB\">no\u03c2co<\/font><font color=\"#4671DS\">pia<\/font><font color=\"#A60000\"><sup>\u25c1<\/sup><\/font><i><sub><font color=\"#5E1FFF\"> +++$+++ ::::Oh, I remember states now. Yeah, not sure why one would collapse the template at all. Kind of a silly option. Well, when I messed around with ems, they varied between skins (I tried Vector, and I always use Modern, otherwise), and I'm using Safari for a browser, and your 24.2 thing looked fine on Safari/skin=Modern, so I assume you've figured out the secret width needed. Not sure how well it would work, but you could always put an infobox and the album ratings template on an otherwise-empty sandbox, then throw that URL into [http://browsershots.org/ browsershots.org] and see if the widths vary from browser to browser. They'd all be in Vector (default) skin, I think. –&nbsp;<font color="#06266f">Kerαu</font><font color="#1240AB">noςco</font><font color="#4671DS">pia</font><font color="#A60000"><sup>◁</sup></font><i><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User:Keraunoscopia|gala]][[User talk:Keraunoscopia|xies]]</font></sub></i> 03:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

87387 +++$+++ Loganberry +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-03 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.238805900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your edits to this article. The thing is, though, they didn't play the Australia national cricket team; they played the Australians. Apologies if you already knew this, but there's a rigid distinction in operation here: \"Australia\" as such ''only'' play international cricket; all matches against counties, universities and so on are listed as \"Australians\". Ditto with other countries, so that (for example) \"Worcestershire v Pakistanis\" doesn't mean any old Pakistanis, but always the national team playing a non-international match. For that reason I'm inclined to change those edits back, but I'll leave it a day or two in case you want to come back at me.  +++$+++ Thanks for your edits to this article. The thing is, though, they didn't play the Australia national cricket team; they played the Australians. Apologies if you already knew this, but there's a rigid distinction in operation here: "Australia" as such ''only'' play international cricket; all matches against counties, universities and so on are listed as "Australians". Ditto with other countries, so that (for example) "Worcestershire v Pakistanis" doesn't mean any old Pakistanis, but always the national team playing a non-international match. For that reason I'm inclined to change those edits back, but I'll leave it a day or two in case you want to come back at me. [[User:Loganberry|Loganberry]] ([[User talk:Loganberry|Talk]]) 17:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
87388 +++$+++ Loganberry +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87387 +++$+++ 87387 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.238806140E09 +++$+++ To answer the obvious question, where there is no convenient adjectival form, one just adds \"XI\" to the team name, so that you have \"Barbados v England XI\" or whatever. For historical reasons, until the 1970s, England played as \"MCC\" in non-international tour games.  +++$+++ :To answer the obvious question, where there is no convenient adjectival form, one just adds "XI" to the team name, so that you have "Barbados v England XI" or whatever. For historical reasons, until the 1970s, England played as "MCC" in non-international tour games. [[User:Loganberry|Loganberry]] ([[User talk:Loganberry|Talk]]) 17:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
87389 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87387 +++$+++ 87388 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.238806860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the explanation Loganberry. I didn't know about that distinction. I'll change it back.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the explanation Loganberry. I didn't know about that distinction. I'll change it back. [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 18:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
87390 +++$+++ Loganberry +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87387 +++$+++ 87389 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.239397380E09 +++$+++ Thanks. As with most things cricket, the logic isn't perfect (eg theEngland matches against the Australian Forces in 1945 ''are'' \"England\", not \"England XI\") but it's usually reliable otherwise.  +++$+++ :::Thanks. As with most things cricket, the logic isn't perfect (eg theEngland matches against the Australian Forces in 1945 ''are'' "England", not "England XI") but it's usually reliable otherwise. [[User:Loganberry|Loganberry]] ([[User talk:Loganberry|Talk]]) 14:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

262180 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-18 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.287465720E09 +++$+++ New photo added by a drive-by to [[Marwari horse]]. Nice image, superficial image check suggests licensing is OK, but it's your article, so may want to peek.  It was in a bad spot, so I moved it, but not sure I improved matters.   +++$+++ New photo added by a drive-by to [[Marwari horse]]. Nice image, superficial image check suggests licensing is OK, but it's your article, so may want to peek.  It was in a bad spot, so I moved it, but not sure I improved matters.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 22:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
262181 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262180 +++$+++ 262180 +++$+++ 2010-10-18 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.287467160E09 +++$+++ Licensing isn't quite right. I've dropped a note on the editor's talk; won't remove the image for now, but if it's not cleared up shortly it'll need to go.  +++$+++ :Licensing isn't quite right. I've dropped a note on the editor's talk; won't remove the image for now, but if it's not cleared up shortly it'll need to go. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
262182 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262180 +++$+++ 262181 +++$+++ 2010-10-18 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.287468840E09 +++$+++ Allright, licensing fixed. All good now - it's a nice image.  +++$+++ ::Allright, licensing fixed. All good now - it's a nice image. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 23:14, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

262150 +++$+++ Venerock +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-03 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.286164740E09 +++$+++ mamasita means lady in my native language (for not misunderstanding)-- +++$+++ mamasita means lady in my native language (for not misunderstanding)--[[User:Venerock|Venerock]] ([[User talk:Venerock|talk]]) 20:59, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
262151 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262150 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-10-04 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.286195520E09 +++$+++ Took a quick peek at this.  May be a good idea to review [[List of horse breeds]] and [[Iberian horse]] to see if we already have articles (under a different spelling) for some of the breeds currently redlinked in the template.  Also not sure if we really need a nav template for this group -- WPEQ is a bit template heavy already... and I'd dread to see separate German, Italian, English and (god fobid!) USA templates, especially if we got fights going over which country claims which breed (like we have at Lipizzan!)...  The Italian, Japanese, and Indonesian horse breed articles just have extensive see also sections that cross-ref the others, or, if the Spanish horse list is too huge for a see also, we could expand [[Iberian horse]] into a list something along the lines of [[stock horse]] or [[gaited horse]].  Just a thought, and should this whole thread go over to WPEQ for more folks to discuss?   +++$+++ ::Took a quick peek at this.  May be a good idea to review [[List of horse breeds]] and [[Iberian horse]] to see if we already have articles (under a different spelling) for some of the breeds currently redlinked in the template.  Also not sure if we really need a nav template for this group -- WPEQ is a bit template heavy already... and I'd dread to see separate German, Italian, English and (god fobid!) USA templates, especially if we got fights going over which country claims which breed (like we have at Lipizzan!)...  The Italian, Japanese, and Indonesian horse breed articles just have extensive see also sections that cross-ref the others, or, if the Spanish horse list is too huge for a see also, we could expand [[Iberian horse]] into a list something along the lines of [[stock horse]] or [[gaited horse]].  Just a thought, and should this whole thread go over to WPEQ for more folks to discuss?  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 05:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

524327 +++$+++ Vicond +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524327 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-12 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.189657020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Vicond|Vicond]] 21:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
524328 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524327 +++$+++ 524327 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.189720920E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about it. I doubt many email harvesters will go digging in page histories, and don't know of any downstream sites that copy our histories, just our pages. Removing it from the page should be sufficient. -- +++$+++ : Don't worry about it. I doubt many email harvesters will go digging in page histories, and don't know of any downstream sites that copy our histories, just our pages. Removing it from the page should be sufficient. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

262184 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-19 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.287490620E09 +++$+++ See also my discussion at [[User talk:Good Olfactory]], leading to this inquiry. -- +++$+++ See also my discussion at [[User talk:Good Olfactory]], leading to this inquiry. --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 05:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
262185 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262184 +++$+++ 262184 +++$+++ 2010-10-19 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.287509340E09 +++$+++ I've responded at Good Olfactory's page to keep this all in one spot.  +++$+++ :I've responded at Good Olfactory's page to keep this all in one spot. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 10:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

524330 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.189668060E09 +++$+++ My wiki mail option is working but I have to type in the following, http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Emailuser\/ plus the username to get it to do so. Anyway problem solved and please feel free to not respond to any of my messages today including the 2 I sent by email. And thanks for your help. ... +++$+++ My wiki mail option is working but I have to type in the following, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Emailuser/ plus the username to get it to do so. Anyway problem solved and please feel free to not respond to any of my messages today including the 2 I sent by email. And thanks for your help. ...[[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 00:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524331 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524330 +++$+++ 524330 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.189720800E09 +++$+++ I received your 2 emails. I'm not sure I understood the second, but if it's taken care of, that's good too. :-) -- +++$+++ : I received your 2 emails. I'm not sure I understood the second, but if it's taken care of, that's good too. :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

524332 +++$+++ Capricornis +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-12 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.189663740E09 +++$+++ What is the policy when someone writes something like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Republic_of_Macedonia&diff=157152659&oldid=156689101 this] ? Does their IP get banned and their comment purged from the talk page?  +++$+++ What is the policy when someone writes something like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Republic_of_Macedonia&diff=157152659&oldid=156689101 this] ? Does their IP get banned and their comment purged from the talk page? [[User:Capricornis|Capricornis]] 23:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
524333 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524332 +++$+++ 524332 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.189668900E09 +++$+++ I left a warning on their talk page. Looks like others have already removed the offensive comment.  +++$+++ :I left a warning on their talk page. Looks like others have already removed the offensive comment. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 00:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524334 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524332 +++$+++ 524333 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.189721400E09 +++$+++ They would be [[Wikipedia:blocking policy|blocked]], yes, but it looks like they haven't been repeating. [[IP address]]es are usually not [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banned]], because an IP is usually just a number handed out by a service provider, and will be given to a different person  eventually; certainly when the person signs up with a new service provider, and sometimes even faster than that. Our acquaintaince from Perth editing on that subject has shown the ability to get a new IP number within minutes of the old one being blocked, sometimes several times a day; fortunately, however, this isn't him. -- +++$+++ :: They would be [[Wikipedia:blocking policy|blocked]], yes, but it looks like they haven't been repeating. [[IP address]]es are usually not [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banned]], because an IP is usually just a number handed out by a service provider, and will be given to a different person  eventually; certainly when the person signs up with a new service provider, and sometimes even faster than that. Our acquaintaince from Perth editing on that subject has shown the ability to get a new IP number within minutes of the old one being blocked, sometimes several times a day; fortunately, however, this isn't him. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524335 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524332 +++$+++ 524334 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.189721700E09 +++$+++ I see a similar address made a similar comment. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Republic_of_Macedonia&diff=157578888&oldid=157499660] If it becomes a regular thing, tell me, and I will semi-protect the article talk page. That will stop all IP addresses without an account from editing there (apparently some do make non-abusive comments[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Republic_of_Macedonia&diff=156689101&oldid=156496906]) but if we have to, we will. -- +++$+++ ::: I see a similar address made a similar comment. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Republic_of_Macedonia&diff=157578888&oldid=157499660] If it becomes a regular thing, tell me, and I will semi-protect the article talk page. That will stop all IP addresses without an account from editing there (apparently some do make non-abusive comments[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Republic_of_Macedonia&diff=156689101&oldid=156496906]) but if we have to, we will. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

262189 +++$+++ SmokeyJoe +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262189 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-25 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.287993420E09 +++$+++ Hi Dana.  Thanks for closing [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2010_October_14#Category:Wikipedians_open_to_whale_squishing]].  That was a decent close.  I might have said \"no consensus for deviating from policy-based arguments\" instead of mentioning IAR.  You put your closing note at the bottom of the debate.  That is a bit unusual.  Usually, the closing explanation goes at the top, with the close, doesn't it?  -- +++$+++ Hi Dana.  Thanks for closing [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_October_14#Category:Wikipedians_open_to_whale_squishing]].  That was a decent close.  I might have said "no consensus for deviating from policy-based arguments" instead of mentioning IAR.  You put your closing note at the bottom of the debate.  That is a bit unusual.  Usually, the closing explanation goes at the top, with the close, doesn't it?  --[[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 00:57, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
262190 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262189 +++$+++ 262189 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.287993720E09 +++$+++ Hi Smokey! Thanks for the nice note! LOL, I guess I'm more used to FAR closures, where closing notes go at the bottom. Feel free to move the comment if you would like.  +++$+++ :Hi Smokey! Thanks for the nice note! LOL, I guess I'm more used to FAR closures, where closing notes go at the bottom. Feel free to move the comment if you would like. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 01:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

262191 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262191 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-25 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.287993960E09 +++$+++ I think you should close the first one too, as I gave it as an example of a bad FA a few times ''' +++$+++ I think you should close the first one too, as I gave it as an example of a bad FA a few times '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey#Photo_poll|<font color="#FA8605">new photo poll]]''</font>)  01:06, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
262192 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262191 +++$+++ 262191 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.287994200E09 +++$+++ Will do. When I closed Dorset it wasn't exactly 14 days for those. I'll get to them tomorrow morning (it's getting to be bedtime here!) Have you had a chance to check out the two I pinged you about?  +++$+++ :Will do. When I closed Dorset it wasn't exactly 14 days for those. I'll get to them tomorrow morning (it's getting to be bedtime here!) Have you had a chance to check out the two I pinged you about? [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 01:10, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

524336 +++$+++ Junebug52 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524336 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.189676400E09 +++$+++ Hello, I did an edit on one of the porn stars pages and I have an editor who just joined [[wikipedia]] who is going onto the article and adding things at random. I removed the personal info like where he lives and the editor put it right back on. Then the editor made an edit and place a description as this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Arpad_Miklos&diff=prev&oldid=157524752]. COuld you please look at this? I did go onto theri talk page and explain about putting personal info and advertisement onto an article. I hope it helps. Thank you  +++$+++ Hello, I did an edit on one of the porn stars pages and I have an editor who just joined [[wikipedia]] who is going onto the article and adding things at random. I removed the personal info like where he lives and the editor put it right back on. Then the editor made an edit and place a description as this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arpad_Miklos&diff=prev&oldid=157524752]. COuld you please look at this? I did go onto theri talk page and explain about putting personal info and advertisement onto an article. I hope it helps. Thank you [[User:Junebug52|Junebug52]] 02:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524337 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524336 +++$+++ 524336 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.189713300E09 +++$+++ You have the right idea; we certainly want confirmation before accusing someone of being an escort, which is usually a euphemism for being a prostitute. However, in this case, he's apparently a prizewinning escort. (Yes, I didn't know there was a prize for that either, but it seems there is ... live and learn. I'll be making an article for the [[International Escort Awards]] soon; it got coverage from the ''[[Village Voice]]'', ''[[DNA Magazine]]'', and even a bit from the ''[[New York Daily News]]''.) Winning the prize is fairly clear confirmation that he does work as an escort. -- +++$+++ : You have the right idea; we certainly want confirmation before accusing someone of being an escort, which is usually a euphemism for being a prostitute. However, in this case, he's apparently a prizewinning escort. (Yes, I didn't know there was a prize for that either, but it seems there is ... live and learn. I'll be making an article for the [[International Escort Awards]] soon; it got coverage from the ''[[Village Voice]]'', ''[[DNA Magazine]]'', and even a bit from the ''[[New York Daily News]]''.) Winning the prize is fairly clear confirmation that he does work as an escort. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 12:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524338 +++$+++ Junebug52 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524336 +++$+++ 524337 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.189713600E09 +++$+++ I had no idea! I just reverted the edit because he stated that the subject was a close friend and wanted the info on the page. As you and I both know, there has to be more to the verification than just saying \"The subject wants the info included\" That is why I made the edit and then went to his talk page to advise him that we would need sourcing for that if he wanted the info to remain. I had no idea! LOL Well if I ever need another job, now I know where I can get one and get an award for doing it! LOL Thanks man  +++$+++ ::I had no idea! I just reverted the edit because he stated that the subject was a close friend and wanted the info on the page. As you and I both know, there has to be more to the verification than just saying "The subject wants the info included" That is why I made the edit and then went to his talk page to advise him that we would need sourcing for that if he wanted the info to remain. I had no idea! LOL Well if I ever need another job, now I know where I can get one and get an award for doing it! LOL Thanks man [[User:Junebug52|Junebug52]] 13:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

262193 +++$+++ Djflem +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-25 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.288047660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your feedback on the above. I wonder if you could give a tip on what is needed in\/which direction could be taken regarding the LEAD. It does seem to present a good synopsisof the what is covered in article w\/o going into details later discussed. Is it the prose? Is it the info? Is it the order? Not sure, and don't wanna go messin' w\/o a focus. Thanks  +++$+++ Thanks for your feedback on the above. I wonder if you could give a tip on what is needed in/which direction could be taken regarding the LEAD. It does seem to present a good synopsisof the what is covered in article w/o going into details later discussed. Is it the prose? Is it the info? Is it the order? Not sure, and don't wanna go messin' w/o a focus. Thanks [[User:Djflem|Djflem]] ([[User talk:Djflem|talk]]) 16:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
262194 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262193 +++$+++ 262193 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.288052460E09 +++$+++ I've responded on the review page, and have that page watchlisted. Thanks for your work on the article!  +++$+++ : I've responded on the review page, and have that page watchlisted. Thanks for your work on the article! [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 17:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

524339 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.189721820E09 +++$+++ Regarding [[:Image:Arpad Miklos cropped.jpg]] on the above article, do you know if there was an OTRS ticket for images from hisxpress.com? I've seen several images from there, supposedly under GFDL, and remember the issue coming up at [[WP:PUI]] quite a while ago. But I can't find the source for the permission, and it's not copyleft on the source so far as I can tell. I'll start asking around with the uploaders if you don't know, but thought I would check with the all-knowing Renaissance Mouse first. If we do have a ticket the images should probably be moved out to the Commons.  +++$+++ Regarding [[:Image:Arpad Miklos cropped.jpg]] on the above article, do you know if there was an OTRS ticket for images from hisxpress.com? I've seen several images from there, supposedly under GFDL, and remember the issue coming up at [[WP:PUI]] quite a while ago. But I can't find the source for the permission, and it's not copyleft on the source so far as I can tell. I'll start asking around with the uploaders if you don't know, but thought I would check with the all-knowing Renaissance Mouse first. If we do have a ticket the images should probably be moved out to the Commons. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 15:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524340 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.189723560E09 +++$+++ Looks like the permission is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Successful_requests_for_permission#Images_from_www.HisXpress.com here]. I don't know if this is good enough for us anymore - especially since the signature is by {{user|Chidom}}, who is a user that doesn't exist!  +++$+++ :: Looks like the permission is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Successful_requests_for_permission#Images_from_www.HisXpress.com here]. I don't know if this is good enough for us anymore - especially since the signature is by {{user|Chidom}}, who is a user that doesn't exist! [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 15:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524341 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.189724040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for finding that. Oh, I remember Chidom. He came in when [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography]] was sadly lacking a dedicated gay pornography editor, and did a very good job for a while. If it's an issue of editor creditability, that should be good enough; but I don't know it it is, we may well need the full email with headers, etc., archived at OTRS. -- +++$+++ ::: Thanks for finding that. Oh, I remember Chidom. He came in when [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography]] was sadly lacking a dedicated gay pornography editor, and did a very good job for a while. If it's an issue of editor creditability, that should be good enough; but I don't know it it is, we may well need the full email with headers, etc., archived at OTRS. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:54, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524342 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.189723740E09 +++$+++ The person who added this was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASuccessful_requests_for_permission&diff=65912496&oldid=60952637 apparently] {{user|Rentaferret}}. Not sure why s\/he would forge a signature.  +++$+++ ::: The person who added this was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASuccessful_requests_for_permission&diff=65912496&oldid=60952637 apparently] {{user|Rentaferret}}. Not sure why s/he would forge a signature. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 15:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524343 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.189724040E09 +++$+++ Aaah. Hold on a bit, let me dig ... -- +++$+++ :::: Aaah. Hold on a bit, let me dig ... --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:54, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524344 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.189724700E09 +++$+++ He [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=renameuser&user=&page=User%3AChidom changed his username], then two days later [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Secretlondon&diff=prev&oldid=126603298 exercised his right to vanish entirely]. -- +++$+++ ::::: He [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=renameuser&user=&page=User%3AChidom changed his username], then two days later [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Secretlondon&diff=prev&oldid=126603298 exercised his right to vanish entirely]. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524345 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.189725180E09 +++$+++ OK, I'll try to contact someone at New Millennium Video. If we can't get the permission confimed, the images may need to go. And [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Linksearch&target=%2A.hisxpress.com&namespace=&limit=500&offset=0 there are quite a few of them].  +++$+++ :::::: OK, I'll try to contact someone at New Millennium Video. If we can't get the permission confimed, the images may need to go. And [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Linksearch&target=%2A.hisxpress.com&namespace=&limit=500&offset=0 there are quite a few of them]. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 16:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524346 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.189725300E09 +++$+++ I had an email address for him once, but he hasn't responded for a while. I'll send him a note about it, but can't guarantee anything. -- +++$+++ ::::::: I had an email address for him once, but he hasn't responded for a while. I'll send him a note about it, but can't guarantee anything. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524347 +++$+++ Junebug52 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.189725360E09 +++$+++ Hey guys, what an issue. I do not think that is going to be sufficient since there is not a permission for rights. I ran into this with another image and lost the battle some time ago.  +++$+++ ::::::::Hey guys, what an issue. I do not think that is going to be sufficient since there is not a permission for rights. I ran into this with another image and lost the battle some time ago. [[User:Junebug52|Junebug52]] 16:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524348 +++$+++ Junebug52 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.189725480E09 +++$+++ Do you think we should remove it until we get such permission? I think I would feel better about it that way.  +++$+++ :::::::Do you think we should remove it until we get such permission? I think I would feel better about it that way. [[User:Junebug52|Junebug52]] 16:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524349 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.189726620E09 +++$+++ I'd wait. I'm willing to believe Chidom actually got the permission email he wote he did, partly because of [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith]], but mostly because he really was a dedicated editor. He may have already forwarded it to permissions at wikimedia dot org the same way most of the other emails on that page Videmus Omnia found were forwarded. If he didn't, he may still have it around, and may respond to my email to forward it there now, so we can get an OTRS ticket number that way. If not, HisXPress is likely to confirm giving the permission, and we can forward that to OTRS. Between all those possibilities, I think it most likely the image permission is fine, let's give it a couple of weeks. -- +++$+++ :::::::: I'd wait. I'm willing to believe Chidom actually got the permission email he wote he did, partly because of [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith]], but mostly because he really was a dedicated editor. He may have already forwarded it to permissions at wikimedia dot org the same way most of the other emails on that page Videmus Omnia found were forwarded. If he didn't, he may still have it around, and may respond to my email to forward it there now, so we can get an OTRS ticket number that way. If not, HisXPress is likely to confirm giving the permission, and we can forward that to OTRS. Between all those possibilities, I think it most likely the image permission is fine, let's give it a couple of weeks. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524350 +++$+++ Junebug52 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.189727100E09 +++$+++ I am down with that program! Sorry I have stirred this ant hill! But we need to get it right so that it will be easier for other editors in the future. I just hope that you guys don't think I am just being Rambo and busting through these articles. I really am doing research to find cites and sources. There are very few legit sources except for the subjects webpages or escort sites. Very frustrating!  +++$+++ ::I am down with that program! Sorry I have stirred this ant hill! But we need to get it right so that it will be easier for other editors in the future. I just hope that you guys don't think I am just being Rambo and busting through these articles. I really am doing research to find cites and sources. There are very few legit sources except for the subjects webpages or escort sites. Very frustrating! [[User:Junebug52|Junebug52]] 16:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524351 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.189727340E09 +++$+++ Take a look at [[User:AnonEMouse\/MouSearch]]. I made a [[Google Co-op]] customized [[search engine]] to help searching for sources as opposed to endless image galleries and  forums. Maybe that will help somewhat. It doesn't include as many gay sources as it might, mostly because I don't know as much about that area, but there is no reason that can't be improved. -- +++$+++ ::: Take a look at [[User:AnonEMouse/MouSearch]]. I made a [[Google Co-op]] customized [[search engine]] to help searching for sources as opposed to endless image galleries and  forums. Maybe that will help somewhat. It doesn't include as many gay sources as it might, mostly because I don't know as much about that area, but there is no reason that can't be improved. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524352 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.189727580E09 +++$+++ Oooooh, very nice.  +++$+++ :::: Oooooh, very nice. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 16:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524353 +++$+++ Junebug52 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.189727760E09 +++$+++ You guys are much too good to me! I hope after this experience kills me you guys will be pall barriers! And AnonEMouse can give my eulogy so that it is well referenced! You can do the powerpoint so that the images are well protected LOL  +++$+++ :::You guys are much too good to me! I hope after this experience kills me you guys will be pall barriers! And AnonEMouse can give my eulogy so that it is well referenced! You can do the powerpoint so that the images are well protected LOL [[User:Junebug52|Junebug52]] 16:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

52 +++$+++ PAIRdoc +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 52 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.312609980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:PAIRdoc|<font face="comic sans ms" font color="#9966FF" size="2px">&mdash;PAIRdoc</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:PAIRdoc|<font face="comic sans ms" font color="#6666FF">(Talk)</font>]]</sup> 22:53, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
53 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 52 +++$+++ 52 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312615320E09 +++$+++ Wow, the article looks grate, uh, I mean great!  I'll feel free to make any minor (or even not so minor) adjustments, but in general everything looks to be \"just exactly perfect\", as Bobby might say.  Thank you very much for doing this.  I'd encourage you to keep up the good work. <font face=\"cursive\">\u2014  +++$+++ :Wow, the article looks grate, uh, I mean great!  I'll feel free to make any minor (or even not so minor) adjustments, but in general everything looks to be "just exactly perfect", as Bobby might say.  Thank you very much for doing this.  I'd encourage you to keep up the good work. <font face="cursive">— [[User:Mudwater|Mudwater]]<small><sup> ([[User talk:Mudwater|Talk]])</sup></small></font> 00:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
54 +++$+++ PAIRdoc +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 52 +++$+++ 53 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.312617060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the upbeat feedback. Clearly, a propensity for details is paramount in this arena, and thus the overall appeal to me. I will continue to make edits to various articles (e.g., I've done some work on a few BLP's and extensive research on [[Festival Express]], et. al.) as my schedule permits. I look forward to ''Road Trips Volume 4 Number 5'', to be released in November, 2011. However, considering I wasn't one of the original fortunate 7200 who laid out the requisite $450, I will leave the 73 CD ''[[Europe '72: The Complete Recordings]]'' work to you and others! I definitely don't relish that monumental setlist enumeration chore. As an aside, though, I was wondering about the idea of a template to make to additional of future albums somewhat more streamlined. Might be a worthwhile mini-project to construct in a sandbox? Cheers!  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the upbeat feedback. Clearly, a propensity for details is paramount in this arena, and thus the overall appeal to me. I will continue to make edits to various articles (e.g., I've done some work on a few BLP's and extensive research on [[Festival Express]], et. al.) as my schedule permits. I look forward to ''Road Trips Volume 4 Number 5'', to be released in November, 2011. However, considering I wasn't one of the original fortunate 7200 who laid out the requisite $450, I will leave the 73 CD ''[[Europe '72: The Complete Recordings]]'' work to you and others! I definitely don't relish that monumental setlist enumeration chore. As an aside, though, I was wondering about the idea of a template to make to additional of future albums somewhat more streamlined. Might be a worthwhile mini-project to construct in a sandbox? Cheers! [[User:PAIRdoc|<font style="font-size:15px" color="#9933FF" face="Papyrus"><b>&mdash;&nbsp;PAIRdoc&nbsp;</b></font>]]<sup>[[User talk:PAIRdoc|<font style="font-size:10px" color="#993366" face="Verdana"><i>&bull;talk&nbsp;to&nbsp;me&bull;</i>]]</sup> 00:51, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
55 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ 52 +++$+++ 54 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312658460E09 +++$+++ The track listing for ''Europe '72: The Complete Recordings'' is indeed a daunting prospect.  We'll have to wait and see what happens with that.  I haven't ordered a copy either, by the way.  Anyway, thanks again for your recent (and future) work on Grateful Dead album, and related, articles. <font face=\"cursive\">\u2014  +++$+++ :::The track listing for ''Europe '72: The Complete Recordings'' is indeed a daunting prospect.  We'll have to wait and see what happens with that.  I haven't ordered a copy either, by the way.  Anyway, thanks again for your recent (and future) work on Grateful Dead album, and related, articles. <font face="cursive">— [[User:Mudwater|Mudwater]]<small><sup> ([[User talk:Mudwater|Talk]])</sup></small></font> 12:21, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

262199 +++$+++ Meco +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-27 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.288236360E09 +++$+++ [[:Category:Musical groups established before 1900]] can now be deleted. I have added the required categories to all entries though I have left the nominated category untouched. __ +++$+++ [[:Category:Musical groups established before 1900]] can now be deleted. I have added the required categories to all entries though I have left the nominated category untouched. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 20:26, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
262200 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262199 +++$+++ 262199 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.288236600E09 +++$+++ Allright, thanks for letting me know. I've added it to the list for the bot to empty and delete It should be gone within the next day or two at the latest.  +++$+++ :Allright, thanks for letting me know. I've added it to the list for the bot to empty and delete It should be gone within the next day or two at the latest. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 20:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
262201 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262199 +++$+++ 262199 +++$+++ 2010-11-01 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.288627140E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:FAR-instructions&diff=394137204&oldid=391276126 Addition to FAR instructions - exceptions for extreme cases] - please discuss at [[WT:FAR]]. Thank you, -- ''' +++$+++ *[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:FAR-instructions&diff=394137204&oldid=391276126 Addition to FAR instructions - exceptions for extreme cases] - please discuss at [[WT:FAR]]. Thank you, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 08:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

305844 +++$+++ Gonzo_fan2007 +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 305844 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-01 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.209691080E09 +++$+++ With all due respect, 4 minutes was probably too long.  There was nothing you could do to resolve the issue of the copyright tag.  It is against copyright laws for Wikipedia to host images that are not properly license, let alone images that bear a different license than the one the copyright holder placed on his image.  Any image that is a violation of copyright law should be immediately deleted from Wikipedia.  It is not a question of letting the uploader fix something, the expectation is that it should be properly licensed at the time of uploading, not a couple years after.  Another fact is that the photo in question ''cannot'' be used on Wikipedia with the license it has.  If it was simply a question of what the proper license is, and the image was free to host on Wikipedia, than of course I wouldn't have deleted the image, I would've just fixed it.  In the future, if you don't want your photos to be deleted, make sure that the photos can be used on Wikipedia, and make sure that you mark said photo with the correct license.  Cheers, <span style=\"white-space:nowrap\"><font face=\"Harlow Solid Italic\"> +++$+++ With all due respect, 4 minutes was probably too long.  There was nothing you could do to resolve the issue of the copyright tag.  It is against copyright laws for Wikipedia to host images that are not properly license, let alone images that bear a different license than the one the copyright holder placed on his image.  Any image that is a violation of copyright law should be immediately deleted from Wikipedia.  It is not a question of letting the uploader fix something, the expectation is that it should be properly licensed at the time of uploading, not a couple years after.  Another fact is that the photo in question ''cannot'' be used on Wikipedia with the license it has.  If it was simply a question of what the proper license is, and the image was free to host on Wikipedia, than of course I wouldn't have deleted the image, I would've just fixed it.  In the future, if you don't want your photos to be deleted, make sure that the photos can be used on Wikipedia, and make sure that you mark said photo with the correct license.  Cheers, <span style="white-space:nowrap"><font face="Harlow Solid Italic">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<font size="2px" color="teal"> « Gonzo fan2007</font>]] ''([[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|talk]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Gonzo_fan2007|contribs]]) @ ''</font></span>'' 18:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
305845 +++$+++ Gonzo_fan2007 +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 305844 +++$+++ 305844 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.209710580E09 +++$+++ I am not questioning whether or not you uploaded the image in good faith or not, it is obvious that you did.  I have a FLickr account and understand people change their license on photos all the time.  But if there is no proof that the image was licensed under said license, that we have to assume that the license that is accessible (i.e. the most current) is the license the image is and has always been under.  If you can show me proof that the said image was under the license that you put on the image when it was uploaded, then I will gladly restore the image for you, but if there is no proof we must delete the image under our image policy.  Sorry if I sounded rude, but the sarcastic tone in your first post kinda turned me off from being my usually cheery self. <span style=\"white-space:nowrap\"><font face=\"Harlow Solid Italic\"> +++$+++ :I am not questioning whether or not you uploaded the image in good faith or not, it is obvious that you did.  I have a FLickr account and understand people change their license on photos all the time.  But if there is no proof that the image was licensed under said license, that we have to assume that the license that is accessible (i.e. the most current) is the license the image is and has always been under.  If you can show me proof that the said image was under the license that you put on the image when it was uploaded, then I will gladly restore the image for you, but if there is no proof we must delete the image under our image policy.  Sorry if I sounded rude, but the sarcastic tone in your first post kinda turned me off from being my usually cheery self. <span style="white-space:nowrap"><font face="Harlow Solid Italic">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<font size="2px" color="teal"> « Gonzo fan2007</font>]] ''([[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|talk]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Gonzo_fan2007|contribs]]) @ ''</font></span>'' 23:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
305846 +++$+++ Gonzo_fan2007 +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 305844 +++$+++ 305845 +++$+++ 2008-05-02 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.209727680E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I just realized your note on the village pump, heres the url [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photo_zoom.gne?id=253637501&size=o].<span style=\"white-space:nowrap\"><font face=\"Harlow Solid Italic\"> +++$+++ ::Sorry, I just realized your note on the village pump, heres the url [http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=253637501&size=o].<span style="white-space:nowrap"><font face="Harlow Solid Italic">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<font size="2px" color="teal"> « Gonzo fan2007</font>]] ''([[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|talk]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Gonzo_fan2007|contribs]]) @ ''</font></span>'' 04:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
305847 +++$+++ Gonzo_fan2007 +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 305844 +++$+++ 305846 +++$+++ 2008-05-02 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.209790680E09 +++$+++ Your welcome, and don't worry about it.<span style=\"white-space:nowrap\"><font face=\"Harlow Solid Italic\"> +++$+++ :::Your welcome, and don't worry about it.<span style="white-space:nowrap"><font face="Harlow Solid Italic">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<font size="2px" color="teal"> « Gonzo fan2007</font>]] ''([[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|talk]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Gonzo_fan2007|contribs]]) @ ''</font></span>'' 21:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

262203 +++$+++ Koavf +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-02 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.288764540E09 +++$+++ '''Please clarify''' To make sure that I understand here, according to your closure of [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2010_October_23#Category:Yiddish]], this category should be split with no overarching category to include the two new categories, correct? Please respond on my talk. Thank you. \u2014 +++$+++ '''Please clarify''' To make sure that I understand here, according to your closure of [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_October_23#Category:Yiddish]], this category should be split with no overarching category to include the two new categories, correct? Please respond on my talk. Thank you. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 23:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
262204 +++$+++ Koavf +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262203 +++$+++ 262203 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.288774980E09 +++$+++ '''Thanks''' I'll see about splitting this. \u2014 +++$+++ :'''Thanks''' I'll see about splitting this. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 02:03, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
262205 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262203 +++$+++ 262203 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.288775880E09 +++$+++ If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks &bull;&nbsp; +++$+++ * If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks &bull;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 02:18, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

62 +++$+++ BarkingMoon +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 62 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-30 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.306820220E09 +++$+++ [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3ADid_you_know%2FPreparation_area_3&action=historysubmit&diff=431703493&oldid=431692485 hmm] And next time, put it in holding area and avoid the snarky stuff like \"that was suggested to be listed here but was somehow ignored\".  +++$+++ [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Template%3ADid_you_know%2FPreparation_area_3&action=historysubmit&diff=431703493&oldid=431692485 hmm] And next time, put it in holding area and avoid the snarky stuff like "that was suggested to be listed here but was somehow ignored". [[User:BarkingMoon|BarkingMoon]] ([[User talk:BarkingMoon|talk]]) 22:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
63 +++$+++  +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 62 +++$+++ 62 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.306838880E09 +++$+++ What I said is the truth. &ndash;''' +++$+++ :What I said is the truth. &ndash;'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">HTD</font>]]''' ([[Wikipedia talk:In the news/Archive 31#World Cup updates|<font color="#FFA500">ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.</font>]]) 03:48, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
64 +++$+++ BarkingMoon +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 62 +++$+++ 63 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.306902660E09 +++$+++ No it's not true, but at least we know what you are now.  +++$+++ ::No it's not true, but at least we know what you are now. [[User:BarkingMoon|BarkingMoon]] ([[User talk:BarkingMoon|talk]]) 21:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
65 +++$+++  +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 62 +++$+++ 64 +++$+++ 2011-06-01 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.306918680E09 +++$+++ Denial is the first step. &ndash;''' +++$+++ :::Denial is the first step. &ndash;'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">HTD</font>]]''' ([[Wikipedia talk:In the news/Archive 31#World Cup updates|<font color="#FFA500">ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.</font>]]) 01:58, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

524354 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.189810080E09 +++$+++ Chidom replied; apparently hisxpress sent the permission to wikimedia directly, so they didn't send the number to Chidom, and he didn't know he was supposed to get a number. I wrote to permissions-en at wikimedia.org, and they wrote \"The correspondence was indeed forwarded to us, under ticket number 2006072610000589.\" They also wrote \"Please note that while the images are hosted on the hisxpress.com site, they may not be the actual copyright holders of all the works, and therefore may not be in a position to license the images further. It would be best if you could review each image on a case by case basis to determine the actual copyright holder and the validity of the GFDL licensing in this permission, instead of applying a boilerplate template to all of them.\" I'm not quite sure what that is supposed to mean. If the site claims they own the image, in general we need to take their word for it, unless we have evidence or at least claims to the contrary. But maybe it will become obvious if we look at some of the images and they have watermarks that say they are owned by someone other than HisXPress. I haven't looked at any beyond the Arpad Miklos image. -- +++$+++ Chidom replied; apparently hisxpress sent the permission to wikimedia directly, so they didn't send the number to Chidom, and he didn't know he was supposed to get a number. I wrote to permissions-en at wikimedia.org, and they wrote "The correspondence was indeed forwarded to us, under ticket number 2006072610000589." They also wrote "Please note that while the images are hosted on the hisxpress.com site, they may not be the actual copyright holders of all the works, and therefore may not be in a position to license the images further. It would be best if you could review each image on a case by case basis to determine the actual copyright holder and the validity of the GFDL licensing in this permission, instead of applying a boilerplate template to all of them." I'm not quite sure what that is supposed to mean. If the site claims they own the image, in general we need to take their word for it, unless we have evidence or at least claims to the contrary. But maybe it will become obvious if we look at some of the images and they have watermarks that say they are owned by someone other than HisXPress. I haven't looked at any beyond the Arpad Miklos image. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524355 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524354 +++$+++ 524354 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.189815120E09 +++$+++ Good find! I don't mind helping to review and tag some of them, though gay porn is not really my thing (as you can probably tell from the images I usually get). And I don't know if I want to have those pics in my Commons upload log. :)  +++$+++ :Good find! I don't mind helping to review and tag some of them, though gay porn is not really my thing (as you can probably tell from the images I usually get). And I don't know if I want to have those pics in my Commons upload log. :) [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 17:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524356 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524354 +++$+++ 524355 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.189816080E09 +++$+++ I forgot we have a bot to do Commons moves for trusted users now - <s>I highly recommend you sign up for it<\/s>Never mind, I see you're already an approved user. [[User:Betacommand\/Commons]].  +++$+++ ::I forgot we have a bot to do Commons moves for trusted users now - <s>I highly recommend you sign up for it</s>Never mind, I see you're already an approved user. [[User:Betacommand/Commons]]. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 17:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524357 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524354 +++$+++ 524356 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.189816440E09 +++$+++ I looked at {{tl|OTRS ticket}} and it seems to need some sort of ticket id, as well as the ticket number. I asked permissions for that, and for clarification on how we are to determine \"actual copyright holder\" other than HisXPress. Let's see what they have to say. -- +++$+++ ::: I looked at {{tl|OTRS ticket}} and it seems to need some sort of ticket id, as well as the ticket number. I asked permissions for that, and for clarification on how we are to determine "actual copyright holder" other than HisXPress. Let's see what they have to say. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524358 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524354 +++$+++ 524357 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.189816860E09 +++$+++ Should be able to use <nowiki>{{PermissionOTRS-ID|2006072610000589}}<\/nowiki> (at least that's what I'm doing). I'm only tagging the ones that are obvious promo photos, and not DVD covers etc. that apparently have other copyright holders than New Millennium Video.  +++$+++ ::::Should be able to use <nowiki>{{PermissionOTRS-ID|2006072610000589}}</nowiki> (at least that's what I'm doing). I'm only tagging the ones that are obvious promo photos, and not DVD covers etc. that apparently have other copyright holders than New Millennium Video. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 17:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524359 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524354 +++$+++ 524358 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.189819980E09 +++$+++ OK, I started on the images. (The Miklos image was one that I did.) Before moving out to Commons, the descriptions have to be fixed and the OTRS ticket number added. I'm listing the ones with other copyright holders at [[WP:PUI]] for probable deletion, as they're [[WP:NFCC#1]] vios if they're not under free license. I'll keep working but would appreciate some help. The ticket number should probably be added in a note somewhere at [[WP:P*]] in case someone wants to use other images from that site.  +++$+++ :::::OK, I started on the images. (The Miklos image was one that I did.) Before moving out to Commons, the descriptions have to be fixed and the OTRS ticket number added. I'm listing the ones with other copyright holders at [[WP:PUI]] for probable deletion, as they're [[WP:NFCC#1]] vios if they're not under free license. I'll keep working but would appreciate some help. The ticket number should probably be added in a note somewhere at [[WP:P*]] in case someone wants to use other images from that site. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 18:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524360 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524354 +++$+++ 524359 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.189821300E09 +++$+++ Did that, also added the OTRS number and info to the Successful requests for permission post. -- +++$+++ :::::: Did that, also added the OTRS number and info to the Successful requests for permission post. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

262211 +++$+++ MBK004 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-04 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.288882140E09 +++$+++ Dana, next time you are going to do [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:WPMILHIST_Announcements&curid=3513533&diff=394615378&oldid=394537015 this], would you mind also doing [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Military_history%2FReview&action=historysubmit&diff=394746827&oldid=394546514 this] as well since MILHIST lists active reviews at two places. Thanks, -''' +++$+++ Dana, next time you are going to do [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:WPMILHIST_Announcements&curid=3513533&diff=394615378&oldid=394537015 this], would you mind also doing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Military_history%2FReview&action=historysubmit&diff=394746827&oldid=394546514 this] as well since MILHIST lists active reviews at two places. Thanks, -'''[[User:MBK004|MBK]]'''<sub>[[User talk:MBK004|004]]</sub> 07:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
262212 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262211 +++$+++ 262211 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.288893480E09 +++$+++ Oops, sorry about that, I had forgotten they were in both places. Thanks for the note.  +++$+++ :Oops, sorry about that, I had forgotten they were in both places. Thanks for the note. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 10:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

68 +++$+++ Rms125a@hotmail.com +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 68 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.308508860E09 +++$+++ Salamat po.  +++$+++ Salamat po. [[User:Rms125a@hotmail.com|Rms125a@hotmail.com]] ([[User talk:Rms125a@hotmail.com|talk]]) 11:41, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
69 +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 68 +++$+++ 68 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.308509040E09 +++$+++ Walang anuman. \u2013''' +++$+++ :Walang anuman. –'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">H</font>]][[User talk:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">T</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">D</font>]]''' 11:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

611035 +++$+++ Dream Focus  +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-02 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.275472560E09 +++$+++ There is never any reason to close an AFD before the week has ended, unless the nomination is withdrawn and there is no one that says delete or the nominator was a sockpuppet or someone just being pointy.  The article [[Lady]] will most certainly end in Keep, but there is no reason not to give everyone time to speak their mind, no matter how ridiculous their cases may be.  On the other side of the coin, snow deletes never have any possible justification for being done at all.  I've seen nominations start off with a dozen people spamming delete, only to have more rational minded people, who take at least a brief moment to click on the Google news search at the top of the AFD, state valid reasons to keep and add in references.  +++$+++ There is never any reason to close an AFD before the week has ended, unless the nomination is withdrawn and there is no one that says delete or the nominator was a sockpuppet or someone just being pointy.  The article [[Lady]] will most certainly end in Keep, but there is no reason not to give everyone time to speak their mind, no matter how ridiculous their cases may be.  On the other side of the coin, snow deletes never have any possible justification for being done at all.  I've seen nominations start off with a dozen people spamming delete, only to have more rational minded people, who take at least a brief moment to click on the Google news search at the top of the AFD, state valid reasons to keep and add in references. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>]]''' 02:56, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
611036 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611035 +++$+++ 611035 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.275473040E09 +++$+++ Well when a user brought this up on IRC, we agreed unilaterally that it should be closed as a keep. Why should we prolong drama at an AFD when it would continue along the path towards a keep vote? There is no way that the AFD would've ended in delete unless fifty editors showed up and simultaneously voted the same way. When that happens on this site, it is called sockpuppetry and it would've been noticed. I stand by my decision to close it as I know that user planned to do the same but I beat him to it.  +++$+++ :Well when a user brought this up on IRC, we agreed unilaterally that it should be closed as a keep. Why should we prolong drama at an AFD when it would continue along the path towards a keep vote? There is no way that the AFD would've ended in delete unless fifty editors showed up and simultaneously voted the same way. When that happens on this site, it is called sockpuppetry and it would've been noticed. I stand by my decision to close it as I know that user planned to do the same but I beat him to it. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 03:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
611037 +++$+++ Tim Song +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611035 +++$+++ 611036 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.275473100E09 +++$+++ Did you mean unanimously?  +++$+++ ::Did you mean unanimously? [[User:Tim Song|Tim Song]] ([[User talk:Tim Song|talk]]) 03:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
611038 +++$+++ Wolfkeeper +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611035 +++$+++ 611035 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.275473160E09 +++$+++ I've undone the close. Exactly how stupid do you think we are to let a contested AFD close as a 'snow', about 4 days early, and exactly how stupid are you to do something like that in the middle of your RFA? That's a rhetorical question by the way, that means you don't need to answer that.- <small> +++$+++ :I've undone the close. Exactly how stupid do you think we are to let a contested AFD close as a 'snow', about 4 days early, and exactly how stupid are you to do something like that in the middle of your RFA? That's a rhetorical question by the way, that means you don't need to answer that.- <small>[[User_talk:Wolfkeeper|''Wolfkeeper'']]</small> 03:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
611039 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611035 +++$+++ 611038 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.275473340E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I guess I did Tim. Wolfkeeper, that wasn't contested at all. I don't know what you are thinking of but that was clearly going for a keep vote.  +++$+++ ::Yeah, I guess I did Tim. Wolfkeeper, that wasn't contested at all. I don't know what you are thinking of but that was clearly going for a keep vote. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 03:09, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
611040 +++$+++ Wolfkeeper +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611035 +++$+++ 611039 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.275476040E09 +++$+++ Very, probably, but not definitely. Snow keep isn't even a policy, but is an essay and it's meant to be used when there's basically absolutely no chance at all. Basically, if you do it, and ''anyone'' questions it even the proposer, you've fucked up.- <small> +++$+++ :::Very, probably, but not definitely. Snow keep isn't even a policy, but is an essay and it's meant to be used when there's basically absolutely no chance at all. Basically, if you do it, and ''anyone'' questions it even the proposer, you've fucked up.- <small>[[User_talk:Wolfkeeper|''Wolfkeeper'']]</small> 03:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
611041 +++$+++ Soap +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611035 +++$+++ 611040 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.275510960E09 +++$+++ The AfD was re-closed, again under SNOW, by an administrator about an hour later.  ''' +++$+++ ::::The AfD was re-closed, again under SNOW, by an administrator about an hour later.  '''[[User:Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]][[User talk:Soap|<font color="057602">''Soap''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]]''' 13:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

71 +++$+++ Kevin McE +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 71 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-26 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.309134060E09 +++$+++ \"''Anyway, who am I trying to convince? Hah hah!''\"  Care to explain?   +++$+++ "''Anyway, who am I trying to convince? Hah hah!''"  Care to explain?  [[User:Kevin McE|Kevin McE]] ([[User talk:Kevin McE|talk]]) 17:21, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
72 +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 71 +++$+++ 71 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.309134420E09 +++$+++ Any explanation to ''you'' would be insufficient. \u2013''' +++$+++ :Any explanation to ''you'' would be insufficient. –'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">H</font>]][[User talk:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">T</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">D</font>]]''' 17:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
73 +++$+++ Kevin McE +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 71 +++$+++ 72 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.309147740E09 +++$+++ If you are not able to defend your comment, will you be man enough to retract it?  +++$+++ ::If you are not able to defend your comment, will you be man enough to retract it? [[User:Kevin McE|Kevin McE]] ([[User talk:Kevin McE|talk]]) 21:09, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

262216 +++$+++ TenPoundHammer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262216 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-06 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.289109000E09 +++$+++ I put the discussion on the talk page. What now? <span style=\"color:green\">Ten Pound Hammer<\/span>, [[Special:Contributions\/TenPoundHammer|his otters]] and a clue-bat \u2022 <sup>( +++$+++ I put the discussion on the talk page. What now? <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, [[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|his otters]] and a clue-bat • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otters want attention]])</sup> 22:50, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
262217 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262216 +++$+++ 262216 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.289109240E09 +++$+++ As I said on the FAR page, just wait a week or so. If no one replies, you can readd the template to the talk page and retransclude the discussion to the FAR page. Also, a collaborative type of post is much more likely to get a good response; comments such as \"dusty, unedited excuse of a talk page\" are unnecessary.  +++$+++ :As I said on the FAR page, just wait a week or so. If no one replies, you can readd the template to the talk page and retransclude the discussion to the FAR page. Also, a collaborative type of post is much more likely to get a good response; comments such as "dusty, unedited excuse of a talk page" are unnecessary. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:54, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

524361 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.189823940E09 +++$+++ I reverted my [[WP:P*]] note, and probably need to add clarification to the Successful requests. In a way, I'm glad Chidom isn't here any more, he would probably be tearing his hair out. :-(. -- +++$+++ I reverted my [[WP:P*]] note, and probably need to add clarification to the Successful requests. In a way, I'm glad Chidom isn't here any more, he would probably be tearing his hair out. :-(. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 19:39, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524362 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524361 +++$+++ 524361 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.189824180E09 +++$+++ The good news for this particular image is that we have an editor claiming to be in touch with the article subject himself, so we can ask him if he would be willing to release a free image (hopefully clothed!). But it's pretty bad news for the other articles using HisXPress images. :-(. -- +++$+++ : The good news for this particular image is that we have an editor claiming to be in touch with the article subject himself, so we can ask him if he would be willing to release a free image (hopefully clothed!). But it's pretty bad news for the other articles using HisXPress images. :-(. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 19:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524363 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524361 +++$+++ 524362 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.189894860E09 +++$+++ OK, I added a note to the permissions page, referencing your post here, and all the images I could find have been nominated for deletion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion\/2007_September_15#Images_from_hisxpress.com here].  +++$+++ :: OK, I added a note to the permissions page, referencing your post here, and all the images I could find have been nominated for deletion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_September_15#Images_from_hisxpress.com here]. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 15:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

262219 +++$+++ NicholasJr7 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-08 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.289214060E09 +++$+++ Apologies..., ignore what i wrote as this of course is not a forum for external discussions. +++$+++ Apologies..., ignore what i wrote as this of course is not a forum for external discussions.[[User:NicholasJr7|NicholasJr7]] ([[User talk:NicholasJr7|talk]]) 03:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
262220 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262219 +++$+++ 262219 +++$+++ 2010-11-12 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.289620260E09 +++$+++ Jeez. Well, at least I know it was well written if The Horse is stealing it. There are a couple of pieces from the summary of that documentary that I'll probably add in, just little factoids. I wonder if they're going to release it on DVD - might be a good x-mas present to ask for.  +++$+++ :Jeez. Well, at least I know it was well written if The Horse is stealing it. There are a couple of pieces from the summary of that documentary that I'll probably add in, just little factoids. I wonder if they're going to release it on DVD - might be a good x-mas present to ask for. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 19:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
262221 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262219 +++$+++ 262220 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.289727240E09 +++$+++ For now, it's flattery.  I guess it's that GDFL license having a flip side, eh?   I think you need to download that article into a wikibook (wikibooks are cool, by the way, I haven't ordered one in hardcopy yet, but I've gathered a batch of articles into a pdf!) If you wanted to start doing this gig for pay, I'd back ya as the original writer!  LOL!   +++$+++ ::For now, it's flattery.  I guess it's that GDFL license having a flip side, eh?   I think you need to download that article into a wikibook (wikibooks are cool, by the way, I haven't ordered one in hardcopy yet, but I've gathered a batch of articles into a pdf!) If you wanted to start doing this gig for pay, I'd back ya as the original writer!  LOL!  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 01:34, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

524365 +++$+++ Epbr123 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524365 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.189723920E09 +++$+++ Thank you for comments on [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Epbr123|the RFC]]. I know I can sometimes be rude to other users and I intend to fix this, but do you think the nominations I have been making are inappropriate? I'd like to know so I can adjust my behavior, and your's is the only outside opinion I really trust on this. I do feel the List of big-bust models article is a mess, but I'll stay away from it due to the trouble it causes.  +++$+++ Thank you for comments on [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Epbr123|the RFC]]. I know I can sometimes be rude to other users and I intend to fix this, but do you think the nominations I have been making are inappropriate? I'd like to know so I can adjust my behavior, and your's is the only outside opinion I really trust on this. I do feel the List of big-bust models article is a mess, but I'll stay away from it due to the trouble it causes. [[User:Epbr123|Epbr123]] 15:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524366 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524365 +++$+++ 524365 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.189728720E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I'm not ignoring you, it's just that you deserve a good answer that is proving hard to write. Please believe that I appreciate many of your contributions. If you want, you can read or re-read most of [[User_talk:AnonEMouse\/Archive_9]], where the earlier incidents came up - I think a third of that archive is directly or indirectly comments about you. :-) I'll write more here soon. -- +++$+++ : Sorry, I'm not ignoring you, it's just that you deserve a good answer that is proving hard to write. Please believe that I appreciate many of your contributions. If you want, you can read or re-read most of [[User_talk:AnonEMouse/Archive_9]], where the earlier incidents came up - I think a third of that archive is directly or indirectly comments about you. :-) I'll write more here soon. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524367 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524365 +++$+++ 524366 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.189743540E09 +++$+++ Anyway, that's the general answer. The specific answer, I guess, is to nominate fewer \"bunches\", when you can, try to improve them rather than delete them, and be nicer to people in general. Sorry for being incoherent, hope that helped a bit. - +++$+++ :: Anyway, that's the general answer. The specific answer, I guess, is to nominate fewer "bunches", when you can, try to improve them rather than delete them, and be nicer to people in general. Sorry for being incoherent, hope that helped a bit. -[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 21:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524368 +++$+++ Epbr123 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524365 +++$+++ 524367 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.189744920E09 +++$+++ That was coherent to me and it was the helpful advice I was hoping for. I will have a good think about it. Thank you so much for all your time and effort.  +++$+++ :::That was coherent to me and it was the helpful advice I was hoping for. I will have a good think about it. Thank you so much for all your time and effort. [[User:Epbr123|Epbr123]] 21:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

78 +++$+++ PumpkinSky +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 78 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310343360E09 +++$+++ I've added sources for the reintro fact and also listed it as an option. Cna't find another that mentions the elk record. +++$+++ I've added sources for the reintro fact and also listed it as an option. Cna't find another that mentions the elk record.[[User:PumpkinSky|PumpkinSky]] ([[User talk:PumpkinSky|talk]]) 17:16, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
79 +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 78 +++$+++ 78 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.310343420E09 +++$+++ I had replied, but I liked the elk record too bad that can't be used... \u2013''' +++$+++ :I had replied, but I liked the elk record too bad that can't be used... –'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">H</font>]][[User talk:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">T</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">D</font>]]''' 17:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
80 +++$+++ PumpkinSky +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 78 +++$+++ 79 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310343600E09 +++$+++ Oh well. Thanks. Say, I want to keep a list of the articles I do a fair amount of work on. I don't want it on user page or talk page. Do you have any suggestions?  +++$+++ ::Oh well. Thanks. Say, I want to keep a list of the articles I do a fair amount of work on. I don't want it on user page or talk page. Do you have any suggestions? [[User:PumpkinSky|PumpkinSky]] ([[User talk:PumpkinSky|talk]]) 17:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
81 +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 78 +++$+++ 80 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.310343780E09 +++$+++ You can put it on a subpage like [[User:PumpkinSky\/subpage]] (just change the \"subpage\" to an appropriate name). \u2013''' +++$+++ :::You can put it on a subpage like [[User:PumpkinSky/subpage]] (just change the "subpage" to an appropriate name). –'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">H</font>]][[User talk:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">T</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">D</font>]]''' 17:23, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
82 +++$+++ PumpkinSky +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 78 +++$+++ 81 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.310343900E09 +++$+++ Cool. Tks.Then I could link to it from the top of my talk page. I only want the pumpkin pic on my user page.[[User:PumpkinSky|PumpkinSky]] ([[User talk:PumpkinSky|talk]])  +++$+++ ::::Cool. Tks.Then I could link to it from the top of my talk page. I only want the pumpkin pic on my user page.[[User:PumpkinSky|PumpkinSky]] ([[User talk:PumpkinSky|talk]]) [[User:PumpkinSky|PumpkinSky]] ([[User talk:PumpkinSky|talk]]) 17:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
83 +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 78 +++$+++ 82 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310344140E09 +++$+++ Also, you could put your articles you want to be on DYK at a subpage before transferring it to a real article. This comes in handy for special occasions. \u2013''' +++$+++ :::::Also, you could put your articles you want to be on DYK at a subpage before transferring it to a real article. This comes in handy for special occasions. –'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">H</font>]][[User talk:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">T</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">D</font>]]''' 17:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

262157 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-06 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.286361180E09 +++$+++ Hey Dana, Congrats on Trait du Nord and just a nudge to add your new GAs to the portal -- I'm sort of distracted by other things right now (Why do wiki-crises alway hit when my work life is also a mess?).   +++$+++ Hey Dana, Congrats on Trait du Nord and just a nudge to add your new GAs to the portal -- I'm sort of distracted by other things right now (Why do wiki-crises alway hit when my work life is also a mess?).  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 03:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
262158 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262157 +++$+++ 262157 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.288926960E09 +++$+++ Added Florida Cracker Horse.  I guess I'm sort of the portal maintainer now?  (grin)  +++$+++ :Added Florida Cracker Horse.  I guess I'm sort of the portal maintainer now?  (grin) [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 20:16, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

262224 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-14 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.289732580E09 +++$+++ Sorry if I am snarky today.  Didn't realize what a foul mood I was in until I started editing.  I think my edits\/comments were essentially legit, but my tone was snarky and I didn't intend it as such.  So sorry if I sounded a little mean.  You took a wonderful photo for the Appy article, by the way, and a wonderful-looking horse.  And yeah, nothing like the challenge for the next six months of getting photos of wooly mammoths that whinny... !   +++$+++ Sorry if I am snarky today.  Didn't realize what a foul mood I was in until I started editing.  I think my edits/comments were essentially legit, but my tone was snarky and I didn't intend it as such.  So sorry if I sounded a little mean.  You took a wonderful photo for the Appy article, by the way, and a wonderful-looking horse.  And yeah, nothing like the challenge for the next six months of getting photos of wooly mammoths that whinny... !  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 03:03, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
262225 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262224 +++$+++ 262224 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.289732880E09 +++$+++ Heh, if you think his head looks good it's a good thing you can't see the rest of him. It had rained just enough in the morning that they had all rolled - a filthier group of horses I have rarely seen. And the vet was there for fall checks, of course... No problem on the snarkiness, I know the feeling. Go ride your horse, have some hot chocolate and take a deep breath :)  +++$+++ :Heh, if you think his head looks good it's a good thing you can't see the rest of him. It had rained just enough in the morning that they had all rolled - a filthier group of horses I have rarely seen. And the vet was there for fall checks, of course... No problem on the snarkiness, I know the feeling. Go ride your horse, have some hot chocolate and take a deep breath :) [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 03:08, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
262226 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262224 +++$+++ 262225 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.289737080E09 +++$+++ He's got a nice Arab-ish profile, so of course he's beautiful!!! I'd ride my horse, but it's dark now! (Could the overall wiki-malaise I've noticed around here have any correlation to the end of daylight savings time, I wonder?)  The hot chocolate sounds like a yummy idea though...ummmmm.   +++$+++ ::He's got a nice Arab-ish profile, so of course he's beautiful!!! I'd ride my horse, but it's dark now! (Could the overall wiki-malaise I've noticed around here have any correlation to the end of daylight savings time, I wonder?)  The hot chocolate sounds like a yummy idea though...ummmmm.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 04:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

524369 +++$+++  +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.189730640E09 +++$+++ I have tried to add {{tl|rs}} tags to many of the sources in this article (see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Hispanic_Americans_in_World_War_II&diff=157641715&oldid=157509670 diff]), but Tony the Marine is removing them because he says you said the sources are okay.  Do you actually think these flagged sources are reliable? They're all self-published by non-professional sources and amateurs.  +++$+++ I have tried to add {{tl|rs}} tags to many of the sources in this article (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hispanic_Americans_in_World_War_II&diff=157641715&oldid=157509670 diff]), but Tony the Marine is removing them because he says you said the sources are okay.  Do you actually think these flagged sources are reliable? They're all self-published by non-professional sources and amateurs. [[User:Calliopejen1]] 17:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524370 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524369 +++$+++ 524369 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.189735080E09 +++$+++ That's the first three, if they're representative, I see the pattern. In general the sources are fine. Some can be improved, but it shouldn't be hard, I found the BDM with a basic search. May I suggest working together with him to improve the sources? -- +++$+++ : That's the first three, if they're representative, I see the pattern. In general the sources are fine. Some can be improved, but it shouldn't be hard, I found the BDM with a basic search. May I suggest working together with him to improve the sources? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524371 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524369 +++$+++ 524369 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.189740720E09 +++$+++ AnonEMouse, I received your message. [[User:Calliopejen1]] made some improvements to the article. I was wonddring if you could be kind enough to replace any reference that you believe needs it. I'm asking you to please do me this favor because I have a tendency of messing up things before making them better.  +++$+++ *AnonEMouse, I received your message. [[User:Calliopejen1]] made some improvements to the article. I was wonddring if you could be kind enough to replace any reference that you believe needs it. I'm asking you to please do me this favor because I have a tendency of messing up things before making them better. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 20:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
524372 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524369 +++$+++ 524371 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.190062080E09 +++$+++ Whoo. Tall order - check all 77 references? I checked three above, the first two were OK, the third could be improved, but wasn't absolutely horrible. Tell you what; ask me about the ones that you feel least certain about, and I'll try to help, but man, 77 is a lot. -- +++$+++ ** Whoo. Tall order - check all 77 references? I checked three above, the first two were OK, the third could be improved, but wasn't absolutely horrible. Tell you what; ask me about the ones that you feel least certain about, and I'll try to help, but man, 77 is a lot. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

262227 +++$+++ TenPoundHammer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262227 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-14 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.289739360E09 +++$+++ No one said anything on the talk page in one week so I relisted. <span style=\"color:green\">Ten Pound Hammer<\/span>, [[Special:Contributions\/TenPoundHammer|his otters]] and a clue-bat \u2022 <sup>( +++$+++ No one said anything on the talk page in one week so I relisted. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, [[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|his otters]] and a clue-bat • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otters want attention]])</sup> 04:56, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
262228 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262227 +++$+++ 262227 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.289769240E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks!  +++$+++ :OK, thanks! [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 13:14, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

84 +++$+++ Deryck Chan +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 84 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310568120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 07:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
85 +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 84 +++$+++ 84 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 08:02:00 +++$+++ 1.310569320E09 +++$+++ how about \"...[[Philippine National Police#Non-commissioned officers|SPO2]] Gregorio Mendoz walked out...\" \u2013''' +++$+++ :how about "...[[Philippine National Police#Non-commissioned officers|SPO2]] Gregorio Mendoz walked out..." –'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">H</font>]][[User talk:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">T</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">D</font>]]''' 08:02, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
86 +++$+++ Deryck Chan +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 84 +++$+++ 85 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 09:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310573760E09 +++$+++ Adopted.  +++$+++ ::Adopted. [[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 09:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

262229 +++$+++ Tpbradbury +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262229 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-14 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.289804460E09 +++$+++ Dana, in case you haven't heard already. i see smallman messaged you above noting that they were almost finished. it looks like they've got all the listings back up and running. here's the featured one by cleanup category count: http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~svick\/CleanupListing\/CleanupListing.php?project=Featured_articles&sort=Count  +++$+++ Dana, in case you haven't heard already. i see smallman messaged you above noting that they were almost finished. it looks like they've got all the listings back up and running. here's the featured one by cleanup category count: http://toolserver.org/~svick/CleanupListing/CleanupListing.php?project=Featured_articles&sort=Count [[User:Tpbradbury|Tom B]] ([[User talk:Tpbradbury|talk]]) 23:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
262230 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262229 +++$+++ 262229 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.289804640E09 +++$+++ Yup, I know. I linked it at the top of the FAR talk page, to replace the old cleanup listing. I've already dropped notices on the pages of all of the articles with 6-7 tags that they're due for a cleanup or FAR. The one with ten is mostly \"as of this date\" tags and the one with 8 is already at FAR. Thanks for the note, though.  +++$+++ :Yup, I know. I linked it at the top of the FAR talk page, to replace the old cleanup listing. I've already dropped notices on the pages of all of the articles with 6-7 tags that they're due for a cleanup or FAR. The one with ten is mostly "as of this date" tags and the one with 8 is already at FAR. Thanks for the note, though. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 23:04, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
262231 +++$+++ Tpbradbury +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262229 +++$+++ 262230 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.289806800E09 +++$+++ bloody hell you're a speed demon! you already dropping notes on the articles needing cleanup, takes the weight off everyone else. from svick's talkpage it looks like they're going to get the bot running again, to post listings on wikipedia pages, which should hopefully allow us to keep track of progress like before. i'll look out for that or give us a shout if you see developments,  +++$+++ ::bloody hell you're a speed demon! you already dropping notes on the articles needing cleanup, takes the weight off everyone else. from svick's talkpage it looks like they're going to get the bot running again, to post listings on wikipedia pages, which should hopefully allow us to keep track of progress like before. i'll look out for that or give us a shout if you see developments, [[User:Tpbradbury|Tom B]] ([[User talk:Tpbradbury|talk]]) 23:40, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
262232 +++$+++ Kanatonian +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262229 +++$+++ 262231 +++$+++ 2010-11-21 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.290381120E09 +++$+++ [[Tamil people]], cleanup is done to my best of abilities.  +++$+++ :::[[Tamil people]], cleanup is done to my best of abilities. [[User:Kanatonian|Kanatonian]] ([[User talk:Kanatonian|talk]]) 15:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

524375 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.189807500E09 +++$+++ There are several comments above my next to last comment that I don't see in the history, from Albion, Jamesd1, Itsmejudith... +++$+++ There are several comments above my next to last comment that I don't see in the history, from Albion, Jamesd1, Itsmejudith...[[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 15:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524376 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524375 +++$+++ 524375 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.189808160E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ : --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524377 +++$+++ Reneeholle +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524375 +++$+++ 524376 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.189807740E09 +++$+++ AnonEMouse, we need help in understanding OR.  Four of us agree a section Kwork put in was OR and some of us tried to explain why to him.  Can you please help?  -- +++$+++ ::AnonEMouse, we need help in understanding OR.  Four of us agree a section Kwork put in was OR and some of us tried to explain why to him.  Can you please help?  --[[User:Reneeholle|Renee]] 15:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524378 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524375 +++$+++ 524377 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.189808640E09 +++$+++ You mean [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Alice_Bailey&diff=157851672&oldid=157755144 this section]? I agree with the critics, whether the issue is original research or undue weight. The main problem is that this is the Alice Bailey article, and the section isn't about Alice Bailey, it's about [[Channeling]] in general. We have a whole article on that (it seems to be called [[Mediumship]]), and that section would be better directed there. We can't put a long section critical of channeling in general in the article on every mystic, any more than we can put a long section critical of warfare in general in every article on a general, or a long section critical of abortion in general in every article on a feminist.-- +++$+++ ::: You mean [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alice_Bailey&diff=157851672&oldid=157755144 this section]? I agree with the critics, whether the issue is original research or undue weight. The main problem is that this is the Alice Bailey article, and the section isn't about Alice Bailey, it's about [[Channeling]] in general. We have a whole article on that (it seems to be called [[Mediumship]]), and that section would be better directed there. We can't put a long section critical of channeling in general in the article on every mystic, any more than we can put a long section critical of warfare in general in every article on a general, or a long section critical of abortion in general in every article on a feminist.--[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:24, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524379 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524375 +++$+++ 524378 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.189809660E09 +++$+++ They introduced the topic of channeling, not me. It is not necessary to discuss Alice Bailey, but if the subject is introduced, and emphasised, discussion is justified. Why don't they just take out all the mention of how the books were written, and just discuss what was written? It is unnecessary to the article. The analogy to mystics does not apply, because few mystics were channelers. Many religious traditions forbid it, so channeled literature is almost never found in the writing Jewish or Christian mystics.  +++$+++ ::::They introduced the topic of channeling, not me. It is not necessary to discuss Alice Bailey, but if the subject is introduced, and emphasised, discussion is justified. Why don't they just take out all the mention of how the books were written, and just discuss what was written? It is unnecessary to the article. The analogy to mystics does not apply, because few mystics were channelers. Many religious traditions forbid it, so channeled literature is almost never found in the writing Jewish or Christian mystics. [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 15:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524380 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524375 +++$+++ 524379 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.190062860E09 +++$+++ Oh, I'm not an expert, but in my feeble memory, lots of religions' prophets describe or are described as being possessed by the Holy Spirit, being in a trance, speaking in tongues, being visited by spirits, all of that stuff. Also, it doesn't seem the article focuses on channeling per se, rather the fruits thereof. It doesn't recommend that people go out and become channelers. It also mentions Bailey's suicide attempts, similarly we shouldn't stick in a whole section on how bad suicide is for you.-- +++$+++ ::::: Oh, I'm not an expert, but in my feeble memory, lots of religions' prophets describe or are described as being possessed by the Holy Spirit, being in a trance, speaking in tongues, being visited by spirits, all of that stuff. Also, it doesn't seem the article focuses on channeling per se, rather the fruits thereof. It doesn't recommend that people go out and become channelers. It also mentions Bailey's suicide attempts, similarly we shouldn't stick in a whole section on how bad suicide is for you.--[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

88 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 88 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.311412260E09 +++$+++ Hi Howard, I have taken a look at your nomination for [[NCAA Season 87 basketball tournaments]] and there are still a few problems that need correcting. Could you look at my comments at [[T:TDYK]] and reply there? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Howard, I have taken a look at your nomination for [[NCAA Season 87 basketball tournaments]] and there are still a few problems that need correcting. Could you look at my comments at [[T:TDYK]] and reply there? Thanks. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 02:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
89 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 88 +++$+++ 88 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311447360E09 +++$+++ Another reply.  +++$+++ :Another reply. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 11:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
90 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 88 +++$+++ 89 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.311448260E09 +++$+++ And another.  +++$+++ ::And another. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 12:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

92 +++$+++ Eldumpo +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 92 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312548300E09 +++$+++ To Rikster and HTD - please see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Eldumpo#Notability_of_basketball_players]. Regards.  +++$+++ To Rikster and HTD - please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Eldumpo#Notability_of_basketball_players]. Regards. [[User:Eldumpo|Eldumpo]] ([[User talk:Eldumpo|talk]]) 05:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
93 +++$+++ Eldumpo +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ 92 +++$+++ 92 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.312632840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your response on this. You'll note that two other people have posted, and have suggested the qualifier is removed, rather than amended as per my suggestion. I'd prefer it remains as otherwise the listed leagues will tend to be regarded as black and white, and if it's not on there will be pushed for deletion. Anyway, if you could post there regarding your views on that particular issue and then we can at least make some change to NBasketball. Regards.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your response on this. You'll note that two other people have posted, and have suggested the qualifier is removed, rather than amended as per my suggestion. I'd prefer it remains as otherwise the listed leagues will tend to be regarded as black and white, and if it's not on there will be pushed for deletion. Anyway, if you could post there regarding your views on that particular issue and then we can at least make some change to NBasketball. Regards. [[User:Eldumpo|Eldumpo]] ([[User talk:Eldumpo|talk]]) 05:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

262237 +++$+++ Marcd30319 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-24 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.290651660E09 +++$+++ Dana, thanks for taking the initiative on my laundry list.  Regarding the [[WUDO]], the organization existed for slightly over three years, and while the ''TIME'' magazine article (Note 2) mentioned a land exercise planned for the Fall of 1949 as a follow up to [[Exercise Verity]].  However, I haven't found any subsequuent mention of that exercise.  So it appears that Exercise Verity was the only major military operation undertaken by the WUDO.  In any case, it seems that WUDO was a placeholder for the eventual creation of [[NATO]] and [[SHAPE]].  Your thoughts? +++$+++ Dana, thanks for taking the initiative on my laundry list.  Regarding the [[WUDO]], the organization existed for slightly over three years, and while the ''TIME'' magazine article (Note 2) mentioned a land exercise planned for the Fall of 1949 as a follow up to [[Exercise Verity]].  However, I haven't found any subsequuent mention of that exercise.  So it appears that Exercise Verity was the only major military operation undertaken by the WUDO.  In any case, it seems that WUDO was a placeholder for the eventual creation of [[NATO]] and [[SHAPE]].  Your thoughts?[[User:Marcd30319|Marcd30319]] ([[User talk:Marcd30319|talk]]) 18:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
262238 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262237 +++$+++ 262237 +++$+++ 2010-11-24 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.290653220E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... Well, I would say a brief summary (one paragraph?) on Exercise Verity, plus a quick mention of the TIME mention of a followup (perhaps with a note saying that no sources have been found that give an extended report on the followup). Also, was there anything special about the mutual defense part of the operation? Or was it the standard \"we'll help if the bad guys attack you, but not if you attack them\" sort of deal?  +++$+++ :Hmmm... Well, I would say a brief summary (one paragraph?) on Exercise Verity, plus a quick mention of the TIME mention of a followup (perhaps with a note saying that no sources have been found that give an extended report on the followup). Also, was there anything special about the mutual defense part of the operation? Or was it the standard "we'll help if the bad guys attack you, but not if you attack them" sort of deal? [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 18:47, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
262239 +++$+++ Marcd30319 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262237 +++$+++ 262238 +++$+++ 2010-11-24 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.290665160E09 +++$+++ Dana, check out the revisions and let me know if this works. +++$+++ ::Dana, check out the revisions and let me know if this works.[[User:Marcd30319|Marcd30319]] ([[User talk:Marcd30319|talk]]) 22:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
262240 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262237 +++$+++ 262239 +++$+++ 2010-11-24 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.290668040E09 +++$+++ Yup, looks good. The lead could stand to be expanded a little bit, but otherwise it's a nice little article. I've upgraded to B-class.  +++$+++ :::Yup, looks good. The lead could stand to be expanded a little bit, but otherwise it's a nice little article. I've upgraded to B-class. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
262241 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262237 +++$+++ 262237 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.290772200E09 +++$+++ Hi Shelly, I'm not Dana, but she and I help with one another's editing sometimes, and I think I can explain what's going on.  The Nokota horse article has been designated as a \"good article\" under wikipedia's [[WP:GA]] criteria.  That means that to keep this status, all material in it has to be properly footnoted and sourced. (See [[WP:V]] and [[WP:CITE]] for information on sourcing) In addition, any properly sourced material that IS there now should not be arbitrarily removed without a very good reason that is explained and discussed with other editors.  Each of your edits simply removed properly sourced material with no explanation.  I checked your edit history, and it looks like you've done this in the past as well.  The best way to handle what you want to do is to click on the \"discussion\" link at the top of the page, and then on the talk page for the article, explain your concerns.  I noted that the material you removed concerns a dispute between the two Nokota horse organizations.  The dispute itself, at least until settled, is a controversy that is noteworthy and relevant to include. (We've had to manage a similar set of legal disputes involving the Andalusian horse registries at its article too)  Wikipedia takes a [[WP:NPOV|neutral position]] on these issues and attempts to simply explain the controversy and outline the views of each side.  We can't take sides.  I hope this explains things.  If not, feel free to discuss your concerns at [[Talk:Nokota horse]] and we can try to further sort matters out.  +++$+++ :Hi Shelly, I'm not Dana, but she and I help with one another's editing sometimes, and I think I can explain what's going on.  The Nokota horse article has been designated as a "good article" under wikipedia's [[WP:GA]] criteria.  That means that to keep this status, all material in it has to be properly footnoted and sourced. (See [[WP:V]] and [[WP:CITE]] for information on sourcing) In addition, any properly sourced material that IS there now should not be arbitrarily removed without a very good reason that is explained and discussed with other editors.  Each of your edits simply removed properly sourced material with no explanation.  I checked your edit history, and it looks like you've done this in the past as well.  The best way to handle what you want to do is to click on the "discussion" link at the top of the page, and then on the talk page for the article, explain your concerns.  I noted that the material you removed concerns a dispute between the two Nokota horse organizations.  The dispute itself, at least until settled, is a controversy that is noteworthy and relevant to include. (We've had to manage a similar set of legal disputes involving the Andalusian horse registries at its article too)  Wikipedia takes a [[WP:NPOV|neutral position]] on these issues and attempts to simply explain the controversy and outline the views of each side.  We can't take sides.  I hope this explains things.  If not, feel free to discuss your concerns at [[Talk:Nokota horse]] and we can try to further sort matters out. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 03:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
262242 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262237 +++$+++ 262241 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.290843000E09 +++$+++ I've already responded on Shelly's talk page, with basically the same information. It can't hurt to repeat it, though.  +++$+++ ::I've already responded on Shelly's talk page, with basically the same information. It can't hurt to repeat it, though. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 23:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
262243 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262237 +++$+++ 262242 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.290852240E09 +++$+++ No problem.  By the way, I've probably just stirred up a storm by summarily deleting and redirecting a new article, but it was a content fork and total crap to boot. (Duplicated the list of horse breeds -- and called Akhal-tekes and Arabians \"draft\" horses.)  This was done by a established user who should have known better.  (grump, grump, grump...harrumph!)  +++$+++ :::No problem.  By the way, I've probably just stirred up a storm by summarily deleting and redirecting a new article, but it was a content fork and total crap to boot. (Duplicated the list of horse breeds -- and called Akhal-tekes and Arabians "draft" horses.)  This was done by a established user who should have known better.  (grump, grump, grump...harrumph!) [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 02:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
262244 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262237 +++$+++ 262243 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.290864720E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I saw that. Got to the point where it called Andalusians draft horses, thought about doing something about it, and then decided I didn't have the energy. I've watchlisted the redirect; let me know if stuff starts to heat up.  +++$+++ ::::Yeah, I saw that. Got to the point where it called Andalusians draft horses, thought about doing something about it, and then decided I didn't have the energy. I've watchlisted the redirect; let me know if stuff starts to heat up. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 05:32, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
262245 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262237 +++$+++ 262244 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.290870900E09 +++$+++ I'll take point on this. I was abrupt, but the thing was ridiculous and needed to be weeded out before it grew.  I'm OK with conflict.  Just come visit me at WQA if needed- I might get smacked, though it will be for a worthy cause!  ;-)   +++$+++ :::::I'll take point on this. I was abrupt, but the thing was ridiculous and needed to be weeded out before it grew.  I'm OK with conflict.  Just come visit me at WQA if needed- I might get smacked, though it will be for a worthy cause!  ;-)  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 07:15, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

95 +++$+++ Yath +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 95 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-23 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.145850000E09 +++$+++ Why is [[:Image:Feral fox and rabbit.jpg|this fox]] referred to as feral? Is there some reason to think that it has been domesticated and released? -- +++$+++ Why is [[:Image:Feral fox and rabbit.jpg|this fox]] referred to as feral? Is there some reason to think that it has been domesticated and released? --[[User:Yath|Yath]] 20:40, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
96 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 95 +++$+++ 95 +++$+++ 2006-04-24 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.145904420E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Not what I meant to say. I think I should say ''urban'' fox?  +++$+++ :Thanks. Not what I meant to say. I think I should say ''urban'' fox? [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]] 11:47, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
97 +++$+++ Zuwxiv +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 95 +++$+++ 96 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.168097700E09 +++$+++ I saw this picture, and I thought it was amazing - completely not related to Wikipedia, but did the fox get the rabbit? It looks like it has just about figured out how to open it up. Amazing picture, anyway.  +++$+++ ::I saw this picture, and I thought it was amazing - completely not related to Wikipedia, but did the fox get the rabbit? It looks like it has just about figured out how to open it up. Amazing picture, anyway. [[User:Zuwxiv|Zuwxiv]] 07:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
98 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 95 +++$+++ 97 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.168108500E09 +++$+++ It was amazing that the fox was not at all perturbed by me statnding only ten feet away with a camera. I chased it away in the end.   +++$+++ :::It was amazing that the fox was not at all perturbed by me statnding only ten feet away with a camera. I chased it away in the end.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 10:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

262160 +++$+++ Jrcla2 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262160 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-08 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.286605020E09 +++$+++ Could you please explain what \"'''Rename to \"Foo men's basketball templates\", remove from overall championship category'''\" means [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion\/Log\/2010 September 28#Specialized NCAA men's basketball championship template subcategories|here]]? Foo? Also, when will those sub-cats get deleted? Thanks.  +++$+++ Could you please explain what "'''Rename to "Foo men's basketball templates", remove from overall championship category'''" means [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 September 28#Specialized NCAA men's basketball championship template subcategories|here]]? Foo? Also, when will those sub-cats get deleted? Thanks. [[User:Jrcla2|Jrcla2]] ([[User talk:Jrcla2|talk]]) 23:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
262161 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262160 +++$+++ 262160 +++$+++ 2010-10-08 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.286605620E09 +++$+++ It means that the one for \"UCLA Bruins...championship templates\" will be renamed to \"UCLA Bruins...templates\" and the rest will be renamed per this formula. Then these newly renamed categories will be removed from the overall championship category, but left under the individual school categories, so that additional templates can also be added to them. This was my understanding of the consensus that had developed in the discussion - please let me know if I read this completely wrong! There is a bot that works on these things, and it is usually fairly quick - I am surprised that the templates haven't already been renamed. If it hasn't happened by mid-day tomorrow I'll check with the bot operator and see what's going on. Hope this helps.  +++$+++ :It means that the one for "UCLA Bruins...championship templates" will be renamed to "UCLA Bruins...templates" and the rest will be renamed per this formula. Then these newly renamed categories will be removed from the overall championship category, but left under the individual school categories, so that additional templates can also be added to them. This was my understanding of the consensus that had developed in the discussion - please let me know if I read this completely wrong! There is a bot that works on these things, and it is usually fairly quick - I am surprised that the templates haven't already been renamed. If it hasn't happened by mid-day tomorrow I'll check with the bot operator and see what's going on. Hope this helps. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 23:27, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

101 +++$+++  +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 101 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-09 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.149887160E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 14:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
102 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 101 +++$+++ 101 +++$+++ 2006-06-09 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.149888000E09 +++$+++ Whoops! Now tagged GDFL-self.  +++$+++ :Whoops! Now tagged GDFL-self. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]] 14:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

103 +++$+++ Erebus555 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 103 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-21 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.153528920E09 +++$+++ Also, thanks for your contributions to Birmingham articles! -  +++$+++ Also, thanks for your contributions to Birmingham articles! - [[User:Erebus555|Erebus555]] 17:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
104 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 103 +++$+++ 103 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.156200240E09 +++$+++ ''Handbells'' was my first image upload. I now use GDFL-self for all images. I have not taken advice on this. What's the difference?  +++$+++ :''Handbells'' was my first image upload. I now use GDFL-self for all images. I have not taken advice on this. What's the difference? [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]] <font color="red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]] to me</sup></font> 15:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
105 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 103 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.156221360E09 +++$+++ I have removed the statement from my images so they are now just GFDL-self.   +++$+++ :::I have removed the statement from my images so they are now just GFDL-self.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]] <font color="red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]] to me</sup></font> 21:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
106 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 103 +++$+++ 103 +++$+++ 2006-09-07 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.157677680E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for this.  +++$+++ :Many thanks for this. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]] <font color="red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]] to me</sup></font> 18:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

157126 +++$+++ Erikeltic +++$+++ Nymf +++$+++ 157126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312365000E09 +++$+++ There is a renewed discussion on [[Sondra Locke]] with one of Excuseme99's socks and an administrator.  As you've had some dealings w\/ this topic in the past, I invite you to contribute.  Thanks.   +++$+++ There is a renewed discussion on [[Sondra Locke]] with one of Excuseme99's socks and an administrator.  As you've had some dealings w/ this topic in the past, I invite you to contribute.  Thanks.  [[User:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#E00C0C"><B>Erikeltic</B>]]</span> <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#E00C0C">Talk]]</span>)</span></sup> 02:50, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
157127 +++$+++ Erikeltic +++$+++ Nymf +++$+++ 157126 +++$+++ 157126 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.312396920E09 +++$+++ Fyi... here is the suspected sock [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:PlaceboComp8705].  I added the template to the talk and user page.  Funny... I thought the RfP would have helped.  +++$+++ :Fyi... here is the suspected sock [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PlaceboComp8705].  I added the template to the talk and user page.  Funny... I thought the RfP would have helped. [[User:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#E00C0C"><B>Erikeltic</B>]]</span> <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#E00C0C">Talk]]</span>)</span></sup> 11:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
157128 +++$+++ Nymf +++$+++ Nymf +++$+++ 157126 +++$+++ 157127 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312415100E09 +++$+++ Burn, baby burn! 4 blocked socks :-)  +++$+++ ::Burn, baby burn! 4 blocked socks :-) [[User:Nymf|Nymf]] <sub>[[User_talk:Nymf|hideliho!]]</sub> 16:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
157129 +++$+++ Erikeltic +++$+++ Nymf +++$+++ 157126 +++$+++ 157128 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.312417380E09 +++$+++ Yeah, bagged & tagged.  He's resourceful.  Technical question for you... what happens to the discussion Placebo started on Sondra Locke? Are his comments be allowed to stand?  Consensus may be changed now because of it.  Are those sockpuppet comments given any weight whatsoever?  +++$+++ :::Yeah, bagged & tagged.  He's resourceful.  Technical question for you... what happens to the discussion Placebo started on Sondra Locke? Are his comments be allowed to stand?  Consensus may be changed now because of it.  Are those sockpuppet comments given any weight whatsoever? [[User:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#E00C0C"><B>Erikeltic</B>]]</span> <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#E00C0C">Talk]]</span>)</span></sup> 17:23, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
157130 +++$+++ Nymf +++$+++ Nymf +++$+++ 157126 +++$+++ 157129 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.312419840E09 +++$+++ Nah, they shouldn't be given any weight. I would strike them using {{nowiki|<s><\/s>}} and note that it's a highly blocked user.  +++$+++ ::::Nah, they shouldn't be given any weight. I would strike them using {{nowiki|<s></s>}} and note that it's a highly blocked user. [[User:Nymf|Nymf]] <sub>[[User_talk:Nymf|hideliho!]]</sub> 18:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

262249 +++$+++ Jafeluv +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262249 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-30 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.291134720E09 +++$+++ Hi Dana. I recently moved a bunch of [[The Gambia]] -related articles partly based on a [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion\/Log\/2010 October 8#Subcategories of Category:The Gambia|CFD discussion]] you closed a month ago, and afterwards there have been some objections to changing the name of the country from \"The Gambia\" to \"the Gambia\" (see [[User talk:Jafeluv#The Gambia|my talk page]]). Could you have a look and weigh in if you have an idea about how to proceed with this? Regards,  +++$+++ Hi Dana. I recently moved a bunch of [[The Gambia]] -related articles partly based on a [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 October 8#Subcategories of Category:The Gambia|CFD discussion]] you closed a month ago, and afterwards there have been some objections to changing the name of the country from "The Gambia" to "the Gambia" (see [[User talk:Jafeluv#The Gambia|my talk page]]). Could you have a look and weigh in if you have an idea about how to proceed with this? Regards, [[User:Jafeluv|Jafeluv]] ([[User talk:Jafeluv|talk]]) 08:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
262250 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262249 +++$+++ 262249 +++$+++ 2010-11-30 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.291149000E09 +++$+++ I just closed the CfD - I have no real opinion on the topic. From reading the discussion on your talk page, this looks like something that might be ripe for a RfC, as the pages (and opinions) are all over the board.  +++$+++ :I just closed the CfD - I have no real opinion on the topic. From reading the discussion on your talk page, this looks like something that might be ripe for a RfC, as the pages (and opinions) are all over the board. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 12:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
262251 +++$+++ Jafeluv +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262249 +++$+++ 262250 +++$+++ 2010-12-04 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.291469220E09 +++$+++ Ok, there's currently an RfC on the naming issue at [[Talk:The Gambia#RfC: The Gambia or the Gambia|here]].  +++$+++ ::Ok, there's currently an RfC on the naming issue at [[Talk:The Gambia#RfC: The Gambia or the Gambia|here]]. [[User:Jafeluv|Jafeluv]] ([[User talk:Jafeluv|talk]]) 05:27, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

108 +++$+++ Andypandy.UK +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 108 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-30 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.159649520E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I award you this for all your helpful images you've uploaded, <font style=\"background:white\">[[User:Andypandy.UK|Andeh]]<\/font> is very displeased you haven't already got one! <font style=\"background:white\"> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you this for all your helpful images you've uploaded, <font style="background:white">[[User:Andypandy.UK|Andeh]]</font> is very displeased you haven't already got one! <font style="background:white">[[User:Andypandy.UK|Andeh]]</font> 13:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
109 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 108 +++$+++ 108 +++$+++ 2006-09-30 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.159655760E09 +++$+++ Very many thanks for your generous award. Appreciation is always welcome. :)    +++$+++ :Very many thanks for your generous award. Appreciation is always welcome. :)   [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 15:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

110 +++$+++  +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 110 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-02 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.159826760E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 15:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
111 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 110 +++$+++ 110 +++$+++ 2006-10-02 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.159827240E09 +++$+++ Now tagged GDFL-self. Sorry, and thanks.  +++$+++ :Now tagged GDFL-self. Sorry, and thanks. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 15:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

114 +++$+++ Mlewan +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 114 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-06 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.162871280E09 +++$+++ I retouched your picture of Hancock's statue in Birmingham and uploaded the new version to [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Tony_Hancock_in_Old_Square.jpg commons] for use with the Swedish Hancock article. I guess that's ok when it comes to copyright laws and things, and hope you don't mind.  +++$+++ I retouched your picture of Hancock's statue in Birmingham and uploaded the new version to [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Tony_Hancock_in_Old_Square.jpg commons] for use with the Swedish Hancock article. I guess that's ok when it comes to copyright laws and things, and hope you don't mind. [[User:Mlewan|Mlewan]] 19:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
115 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 114 +++$+++ 114 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.162921320E09 +++$+++ I'm glad it was useful. It's fine in this case as it draws attention to the subject, although I can imagine cases where a photo may have more than one subject, or be trying to show the main subject in context, in which case cropping or blurring could be a removal of useful information. Luckily I used another photo in the article on ''Methodist Central Hall''. No doubt for some retouching you would have to save under a new name to preserve the usefulness of the original for other articles. How about a cross-language link from the English article on Hancock? Best wishes.   +++$+++ :I'm glad it was useful. It's fine in this case as it draws attention to the subject, although I can imagine cases where a photo may have more than one subject, or be trying to show the main subject in context, in which case cropping or blurring could be a removal of useful information. Luckily I used another photo in the article on ''Methodist Central Hall''. No doubt for some retouching you would have to save under a new name to preserve the usefulness of the original for other articles. How about a cross-language link from the English article on Hancock? Best wishes.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 09:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
116 +++$+++ Mlewan +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 114 +++$+++ 115 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.162929780E09 +++$+++ Yes, I left your original picture in the English article, as I thought English readers may have more interest in the Birmingham connection than Swedes do, so they would not want it blurred out. A cross-language link is already present. The Swedes have the only other wiki article in the world about Hancock, apparently.  +++$+++ ::Yes, I left your original picture in the English article, as I thought English readers may have more interest in the Birmingham connection than Swedes do, so they would not want it blurred out. A cross-language link is already present. The Swedes have the only other wiki article in the world about Hancock, apparently. [[User:Mlewan|Mlewan]] 12:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

262260 +++$+++ Mike Selinker +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-01 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.291261140E09 +++$+++ Did the Furman Paladins and Ole Miss Rebels categories really need another week of discussion (or lack of same)? There were other categories on the 11th and 12th that clearly set a precedent for those to be closed as renames, in my opinion.-- +++$+++ Did the Furman Paladins and Ole Miss Rebels categories really need another week of discussion (or lack of same)? There were other categories on the 11th and 12th that clearly set a precedent for those to be closed as renames, in my opinion.--[[User:Mike Selinker|Mike Selinker]] ([[User talk:Mike Selinker|talk]]) 19:39, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
262261 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262260 +++$+++ 262260 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.291262880E09 +++$+++ Meh - perhaps not, and they will most likely be closed as renames, but I figured another week to allow anyone who wants to to comment wouldn't hurt anything since you as the nominator were the only one who had commented so far. Is there something I missed, or a hurry to get these quickly renamed?  +++$+++ :Meh - perhaps not, and they will most likely be closed as renames, but I figured another week to allow anyone who wants to to comment wouldn't hurt anything since you as the nominator were the only one who had commented so far. Is there something I missed, or a hurry to get these quickly renamed? [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 20:08, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
262262 +++$+++ Mike Selinker +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262260 +++$+++ 262261 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.291266480E09 +++$+++ Oh, certainly not. I just felt that precedent had been established with the other renames, and that it could be closed analogously.-- +++$+++ ::Oh, certainly not. I just felt that precedent had been established with the other renames, and that it could be closed analogously.--[[User:Mike Selinker|Mike Selinker]] ([[User talk:Mike Selinker|talk]]) 21:08, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

117 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-07 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.162923180E09 +++$+++ That's why I use ''thumb'' anyway.   +++$+++ That's why I use ''thumb'' anyway.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 10:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
118 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 117 +++$+++ 117 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.163184360E09 +++$+++ You're welcome.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 10:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

119 +++$+++ Trident13 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 119 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.163878500E09 +++$+++ I thought I would drop you a note out of courtesy that I have recommended for '''deletion and listification''' the category you created for the Blue Plaque scheme, and its sub-categories for people and buildings. My reasons for this are simply that by using a category rather than a list, the key encyclopeidc information of who\/where is lost - and not that I think the information is not useful or encyclopedic. Rgds, -  +++$+++ I thought I would drop you a note out of courtesy that I have recommended for '''deletion and listification''' the category you created for the Blue Plaque scheme, and its sub-categories for people and buildings. My reasons for this are simply that by using a category rather than a list, the key encyclopeidc information of who/where is lost - and not that I think the information is not useful or encyclopedic. Rgds, - [[User:Trident13|Trident13]] 11:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
120 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 119 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.163920560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments and courtesy. :) Copy of my vote: '''Strong Keep''' \u2013 for both buildings and people. Buildings can be notable, either because of whom they once housed, or for a totally different reason, perhaps they are a famous theatre, or a historic factory. I am not sure whether your list would be colour specific. The term ''blue plaque'' seems to be the generally accepted term even for plaques which are not blue. I take it to mean a circular monument of any colour. This seems to be how bodies such as English Heritage and those linked externally in the Blue plaques article define them. Despite the main text of the {{Low|Blue plaque}} article the awarding bodies are not just English Heritage and the London councils. They are all over England, I have found (and added to category) one in Wales, I don't know whether there are more, and they exist in Northern Ireland [http:\/\/www.ulsterhistory.co.uk\/index.htm]. I would favour keeping the categories. I find categories useful for browsing related articles and exploring unrelated people or buildings with something in common. The fact that a category does not link a person to a building does not reduce this usefulness. The article itself should describe the relationship. Perhaps a list for people and a list for buildings as well as these categories. My current interest is with architecture and history of buildings so I would appreciate indexing from that direction as well. I vote Strong Keep on the assumption that the recording of historical memorials is not frivolous. I realise that blue plaques in parts of the UK may not be of world-wide interest, but they are a very visible and characteristic sight to tourists. The fact that they have been awarded for 140 years suggests that they are not trivial.  +++$+++ :*Thanks for your comments and courtesy. :) Copy of my vote: '''Strong Keep''' – for both buildings and people. Buildings can be notable, either because of whom they once housed, or for a totally different reason, perhaps they are a famous theatre, or a historic factory. I am not sure whether your list would be colour specific. The term ''blue plaque'' seems to be the generally accepted term even for plaques which are not blue. I take it to mean a circular monument of any colour. This seems to be how bodies such as English Heritage and those linked externally in the Blue plaques article define them. Despite the main text of the {{Low|Blue plaque}} article the awarding bodies are not just English Heritage and the London councils. They are all over England, I have found (and added to category) one in Wales, I don't know whether there are more, and they exist in Northern Ireland [http://www.ulsterhistory.co.uk/index.htm]. I would favour keeping the categories. I find categories useful for browsing related articles and exploring unrelated people or buildings with something in common. The fact that a category does not link a person to a building does not reduce this usefulness. The article itself should describe the relationship. Perhaps a list for people and a list for buildings as well as these categories. My current interest is with architecture and history of buildings so I would appreciate indexing from that direction as well. I vote Strong Keep on the assumption that the recording of historical memorials is not frivolous. I realise that blue plaques in parts of the UK may not be of world-wide interest, but they are a very visible and characteristic sight to tourists. The fact that they have been awarded for 140 years suggests that they are not trivial. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 23:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
121 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 119 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.164409200E09 +++$+++ Link to deletion debate [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion\/Log\/2006_November_18#Category:Blue_plaques].   +++$+++ :::Link to deletion debate [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_November_18#Category:Blue_plaques].  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 15:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

124 +++$+++ BrianSmithson +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 124 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-29 10:26:00 +++$+++ 1.170095160E09 +++$+++ Hi, Oosoom. I restored some links you removed to \"Old Joe\", a blackface minstrel song from the 19th century. The appropriate course in situations like this is generally to create a disambiguation page, not to delink a term that doesn't have an article yet. I went ahead and made [[Old Joe]] a disambiguation page. As for red links, they are okay; they alert us that we need an article. Thanks, \u2014  +++$+++ Hi, Oosoom. I restored some links you removed to "Old Joe", a blackface minstrel song from the 19th century. The appropriate course in situations like this is generally to create a disambiguation page, not to delink a term that doesn't have an article yet. I went ahead and made [[Old Joe]] a disambiguation page. As for red links, they are okay; they alert us that we need an article. Thanks, — [[User:BrianSmithson|BrianSmithson]] 10:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
125 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 124 +++$+++ 124 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.170096180E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 10:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

126 +++$+++ Erebus555 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-15 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.171581240E09 +++$+++ The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject West Midlands|West Midlands WikiProject]] is now active! As your edits focus on articles under the West Midlands scope, then you maybe interested in adding your name to the participants list and participating in the project. Thanks! -  +++$+++ The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject West Midlands|West Midlands WikiProject]] is now active! As your edits focus on articles under the West Midlands scope, then you maybe interested in adding your name to the participants list and participating in the project. Thanks! - [[User:Erebus555|Erebus555]] 15:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
127 +++$+++ Doops  +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 126 +++$+++ 126 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.173492300E09 +++$+++ At any rate, I didn't just make up a name haphazardly; \"Dove's Guide for Church Bell Ringers\" really does seem to be its current working title: [http:\/\/www.cccbr.org.uk\/dove\/home.php]. It hasn't been published in book form since 2000 and today's active form is the website; I think unless there's good reason otherwise a page's name and first sentence should refer to the ''current'' situation. In this case, doing so also considerably simplified things. Thanks,  +++$+++ :At any rate, I didn't just make up a name haphazardly; "Dove's Guide for Church Bell Ringers" really does seem to be its current working title: [http://www.cccbr.org.uk/dove/home.php]. It hasn't been published in book form since 2000 and today's active form is the website; I think unless there's good reason otherwise a page's name and first sentence should refer to the ''current'' situation. In this case, doing so also considerably simplified things. Thanks, [[User: Doops|Doops]] | [[User_talk:Doops | talk]] 18:05, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

128 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 128 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-03 09:39:00 +++$+++ 1.175618340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding coordinates to pages. May I suggest that, if you convert any more OS Grid Refs, less precision is used. For instance, <code>52.548|N|1.932|W<\/code> instead of <code>52.54833|N|1.93212|W<\/code>.  See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#Precision]]. Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks for adding coordinates to pages. May I suggest that, if you convert any more OS Grid Refs, less precision is used. For instance, <code>52.548|N|1.932|W</code> instead of <code>52.54833|N|1.93212|W</code>.  See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#Precision]]. Thanks, [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 09:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
129 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 128 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.175619720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reference. I think that would be very apropriate for places. As I read it, that approximates to a six-figure NGR or 100 meters. I think an extra decimal place would be useful to identify individual buildings, as stated in the guidelines.  Incidentally, I think it essential to include OS grid refs in UK articles as that is the only system usable with paper maps and the only system likely to be familiar to British people. And if you go out exploring with only OS maps and some printouts of Wikipedia articles then you can't convert coordinates on the move!   +++$+++ ::Thanks for your reference. I think that would be very apropriate for places. As I read it, that approximates to a six-figure NGR or 100 meters. I think an extra decimal place would be useful to identify individual buildings, as stated in the guidelines.  Incidentally, I think it essential to include OS grid refs in UK articles as that is the only system usable with paper maps and the only system likely to be familiar to British people. And if you go out exploring with only OS maps and some printouts of Wikipedia articles then you can't convert coordinates on the move!  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 10:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
130 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 128 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 10:15:00 +++$+++ 1.175620500E09 +++$+++ I agree with all you say - but additionally, coordinates are of more use than OS refs to overseas readers (think \"Google Maps\"!) and to GPS users - especially as we're starting to implement the [[Geo (microformat)|Geo microformat]].  +++$+++ :::I agree with all you say - but additionally, coordinates are of more use than OS refs to overseas readers (think "Google Maps"!) and to GPS users - especially as we're starting to implement the [[Geo (microformat)|Geo microformat]]. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 10:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
131 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 128 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.175630040E09 +++$+++ Following your link to Geo, and then to {{Low|Geo in Wikipedia}}, I ended up at {{Low|Great Barr}}, one of the examples of use of the ''coord'' template. This prints a reference implying accuracy to 3m from an input reference implying 110m. Not a good demonstration.   +++$+++ ::::Following your link to Geo, and then to {{Low|Geo in Wikipedia}}, I ended up at {{Low|Great Barr}}, one of the examples of use of the ''coord'' template. This prints a reference implying accuracy to 3m from an input reference implying 110m. Not a good demonstration.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 12:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
132 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 128 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.175644860E09 +++$+++ Thanks; Coord is undergoing some revisions; I've raised the [[Template_talk:Coord#Inappropriate precision|issue of inappropriate precision]] there.  +++$+++ :::::Thanks; Coord is undergoing some revisions; I've raised the [[Template_talk:Coord#Inappropriate precision|issue of inappropriate precision]] there. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 17:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
133 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 128 +++$+++ 128 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.176827820E09 +++$+++ I also note your comments about <\/font>  on your membership note on the Waterways project pages. I'm happy to add an additional column to tables of coordinates on UK articles (see, for example, [[Netherton Tunnel Branch Canal]]). Do you think 6 digits is adequate precision, or would you like to see more? Do you think they need to link to map sources, if the WGS84 coordinates already do?  +++$+++ :I also note your comments about </font>  on your membership note on the Waterways project pages. I'm happy to add an additional column to tables of coordinates on UK articles (see, for example, [[Netherton Tunnel Branch Canal]]). Do you think 6 digits is adequate precision, or would you like to see more? Do you think they need to link to map sources, if the WGS84 coordinates already do? [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 09:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
134 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 128 +++$+++ 133 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 09:56:00 +++$+++ 1.176828960E09 +++$+++ It would be nice if ''coord'' could translate lat\/long into whatever ''national'' grid is appropriate for the country and show it alongside the lat\/long, but that would be an enormous feat.   +++$+++ ::It would be nice if ''coord'' could translate lat/long into whatever ''national'' grid is appropriate for the country and show it alongside the lat/long, but that would be an enormous feat.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 09:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

524418 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.190354460E09 +++$+++ As above,  +++$+++ As above, [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 23:01, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
524419 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524418 +++$+++ 524418 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.190410380E09 +++$+++ Thank you, thank you! I hope I can live up to that high praise. -- +++$+++ : Thank you, thank you! I hope I can live up to that high praise. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

524420 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.190357340E09 +++$+++ and who purportedly has made antisemitic statement on his blog. I dont think the wiki communtity would back the speedy deletion of such an article but I do think such an article deserves to be written. You can help me make sure that it is balanced. Are you interested ?  <small>\u2014Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] ([[User talk:Albion moonlight|talk]] \u2022 [[Special:Contributions\/Albion moonlight|contribs]]) 23:45, 20 September 2007 (UTC)<\/small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> +++$+++ and who purportedly has made antisemitic statement on his blog. I dont think the wiki communtity would back the speedy deletion of such an article but I do think such an article deserves to be written. You can help me make sure that it is balanced. Are you interested ?  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] ([[User talk:Albion moonlight|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Albion moonlight|contribs]]) 23:45, 20 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->[[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 23:49, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
524421 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524420 +++$+++ 524420 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.190406420E09 +++$+++ It's worse than help or not help, I'm not sure Phillip Lindsay (Philip? One l or two?) meets our [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)]] criteria for articles. Read that, but basically multiple unrelated reliable sources need to have written non-trivial articles about him. There are other possibilities (winning a notable award), but non-trivial coverage is the main one. That means several works written about him, and not by him and not by his brother in law, and not phonebook-style coverage. Looking through that Google search I can't find those - I can find lots of mentions, but they're mostly by him, not about him. -- +++$+++ : It's worse than help or not help, I'm not sure Phillip Lindsay (Philip? One l or two?) meets our [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)]] criteria for articles. Read that, but basically multiple unrelated reliable sources need to have written non-trivial articles about him. There are other possibilities (winning a notable award), but non-trivial coverage is the main one. That means several works written about him, and not by him and not by his brother in law, and not phonebook-style coverage. Looking through that Google search I can't find those - I can find lots of mentions, but they're mostly by him, not about him. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

135 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 135 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-26 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.177630500E09 +++$+++ I moved '''Engine Arm Aqueduct''' to [[Engine Arm]], because there seemed to be much more content about the canal than the actual [[aqueduct]]. Does that seem reasonable, to you?  +++$+++ I moved '''Engine Arm Aqueduct''' to [[Engine Arm]], because there seemed to be much more content about the canal than the actual [[aqueduct]]. Does that seem reasonable, to you? [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 16:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
136 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 135 +++$+++ 135 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.177630740E09 +++$+++ That was quick! Yes, I was wondering myself, although ''Engine Arm'' does not give many clues that it is a canal.  :)  +++$+++ :That was quick! Yes, I was wondering myself, although ''Engine Arm'' does not give many clues that it is a canal.  :) [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 16:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
137 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 135 +++$+++ 136 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.177631220E09 +++$+++ I think there are enough clues ;-) Seriously, it could be '''Engine Arm Canal''', if you wish. Is there pedestrian access from a nearby street, or only along the towpath?  +++$+++ ::I think there are enough clues ;-) Seriously, it could be '''Engine Arm Canal''', if you wish. Is there pedestrian access from a nearby street, or only along the towpath? [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 16:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
138 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 135 +++$+++ 137 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.177639680E09 +++$+++ Well, I walked from Gas St to Galton Bridge but you can readily get to the canal at various points - Brasshouse Lane bridge, near the new pump engine house, or to the Engine Arm at Bridge St North, at the site of the old engine (though I didn't know it at the time). No direct access to the aqueduct as I recall. The whole stretch from Smethwick Junction is fascinating.  +++$+++ :::Well, I walked from Gas St to Galton Bridge but you can readily get to the canal at various points - Brasshouse Lane bridge, near the new pump engine house, or to the Engine Arm at Bridge St North, at the site of the old engine (though I didn't know it at the time). No direct access to the aqueduct as I recall. The whole stretch from Smethwick Junction is fascinating. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 19:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

567392 +++$+++ Butwhatdoiknow +++$+++ Morphh +++$+++ 567392 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-19 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.221886980E09 +++$+++ Well, I think Accessibility has been out there long enough. Any ideas for our next project?  +++$+++ Well, I think Accessibility has been out there long enough. Any ideas for our next project? [[User:Butwhatdoiknow|Butwhatdoiknow]] ([[User talk:Butwhatdoiknow|talk]]) 22:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
567393 +++$+++ Butwhatdoiknow +++$+++ Morphh +++$+++ 567392 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-20 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.221903180E09 +++$+++ Sounds good. I'll be in touch.  +++$+++ ::Sounds good. I'll be in touch. [[User:Butwhatdoiknow|Butwhatdoiknow]] ([[User talk:Butwhatdoiknow|talk]]) 02:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

262284 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262284 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-07 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.291732800E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Viennaspottedstallion1740.jpg]] should likely be the most easiest to fix and could be a minor issue, but the others could be problematic.   +++$+++ [[:File:Viennaspottedstallion1740.jpg]] should likely be the most easiest to fix and could be a minor issue, but the others could be problematic.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 06:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
262285 +++$+++ Ealdgyth +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262284 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.291733580E09 +++$+++ I'll get on the two I did (Vienna and NezPerce) in the next couple of days.  +++$+++ ::I'll get on the two I did (Vienna and NezPerce) in the next couple of days. [[User:Ealdgyth|Ealdgyth]] - [[User talk:Ealdgyth|Talk]] 06:53, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
262286 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262284 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.291734000E09 +++$+++ Ealdgyth, could you also note in the descriptions where the photographs are from (collections, museum number or such).  Thanks in advance.   +++$+++ ::: Ealdgyth, could you also note in the descriptions where the photographs are from (collections, museum number or such).  Thanks in advance.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 07:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
262287 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262284 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.291753140E09 +++$+++ Thank you Jappalang! I will start working on these in a bit - time to send out e-mails again, yay... :)  +++$+++ :::: Thank you Jappalang! I will start working on these in a bit - time to send out e-mails again, yay... :) [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 12:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
262288 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262284 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.291766340E09 +++$+++ '''Update''': I have sent an e-mail to Bill and also posted on his talk page, so hopefully we can get resolution to those questions. I would hate to have to remove them, as they are some of the best images we have.  +++$+++ ::::'''Update''': I have sent an e-mail to Bill and also posted on his talk page, so hopefully we can get resolution to those questions. I would hate to have to remove them, as they are some of the best images we have. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 15:59, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
262289 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262284 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.291784640E09 +++$+++ Agreed, here's hoping.  However, I did find some potential replacements if needed.  Nothing as good as the lead image, though.  +++$+++ :::::::Agreed, here's hoping.  However, I did find some potential replacements if needed.  Nothing as good as the lead image, though. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 21:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

143 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 143 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-24 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.180049640E09 +++$+++ Good work on the canal junctions! Where appropriate, do you think we should give the nearest pedestrian access point, from the road (as opposed to canal) network?  +++$+++ Good work on the canal junctions! Where appropriate, do you think we should give the nearest pedestrian access point, from the road (as opposed to canal) network? [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 16:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
144 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 143 +++$+++ 143 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.180050960E09 +++$+++ Yes. Good point. I suspect Salford Junction will have several, not very close, nearest accesses from various arms!  +++$+++ :Yes. Good point. I suspect Salford Junction will have several, not very close, nearest accesses from various arms! [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 16:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
145 +++$+++ Erebus555 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 143 +++$+++ 143 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.180116480E09 +++$+++ Just echoing what Andy said; good work! I've expanded Salford Junction, as you may have already noticed. I certainly had not anticipated expanding it so much, once I started, I just didn't stop! Anyway, happy editing! -  +++$+++ :Just echoing what Andy said; good work! I've expanded Salford Junction, as you may have already noticed. I certainly had not anticipated expanding it so much, once I started, I just didn't stop! Anyway, happy editing! - [[User:Erebus555|Erebus555]] 11:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
146 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 143 +++$+++ 145 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 11:13:00 +++$+++ 1.180116780E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I am worried that adding access from the road is likely to be original research - something to be added later as references are found. Well done on your additions! I don't intend to do all the junctions. There are millions (it seems).   +++$+++ ::Thanks. I am worried that adding access from the road is likely to be original research - something to be added later as references are found. Well done on your additions! I don't intend to do all the junctions. There are millions (it seems).  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 11:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
147 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 143 +++$+++ 146 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.180117860E09 +++$+++ I think \"no OR\" policy can be quietly set aside in such cases, where the information is easily verifiable by another visitor to the site, is not subjective, and is not challenged.  +++$+++ :::I think "no OR" policy can be quietly set aside in such cases, where the information is easily verifiable by another visitor to the site, is not subjective, and is not challenged. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 11:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

524433 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524433 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-25 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.190766840E09 +++$+++ AnonEMouse, could you help me with a technical problem? I was trying to find a diff in Archive 3 of the Bailey article [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Alice_Bailey\/Archive_3&limit=100&action=history], and I see only two diffs out of what must be hundreds. Have they been lost?  +++$+++ AnonEMouse, could you help me with a technical problem? I was trying to find a diff in Archive 3 of the Bailey article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alice_Bailey/Archive_3&limit=100&action=history], and I see only two diffs out of what must be hundreds. Have they been lost? [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 17:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
524434 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524433 +++$+++ 524433 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.190770440E09 +++$+++ The archive only contains the final text, not each diff; the diffs are in the history of the talk page itself. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Alice_Bailey&limit=1000&action=history] Another thing to note is that the timestamps on the posts may be off a bit from the timestamp on the diff, something to do with [[time zones]], I imagine. Good luck! -- +++$+++ : The archive only contains the final text, not each diff; the diffs are in the history of the talk page itself. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alice_Bailey&limit=1000&action=history] Another thing to note is that the timestamps on the posts may be off a bit from the timestamp on the diff, something to do with [[time zones]], I imagine. Good luck! --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

262290 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262290 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-07 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.291776660E09 +++$+++ Eep.  I was worried about this.  We should be able to find Users \"Appaloosas\" and \"AppHistorian\" somehow, they were pretty active for a bit.  However, I am going to put up a bit of a fuss to try and keep the license plate. To me it is significant for demonstrating the special status between the horse and the state of Idaho.  I'd like to think there is an NFCC argument we (OK, I) can advance. I also really busted my butt to get that image. I do want this article to go FA more than I need the license plate to stay, but in general I, for one am a bit tired of having to dumb down longer articles and remove useful images to get them to pass FA review, which at times I think awards form over substance.  I know I'm ranting, and I'm very OK with making sure the images pass muster, but I'd rather see the article stay GA than get trashed. I think the longer content is worth fighting for.  But in spite of all my ranting, let me know how I can continue to be of more help than harm, too. I am still (by three edits) the #1 contributor to this article!  (grin)  +++$+++ Eep.  I was worried about this.  We should be able to find Users "Appaloosas" and "AppHistorian" somehow, they were pretty active for a bit.  However, I am going to put up a bit of a fuss to try and keep the license plate. To me it is significant for demonstrating the special status between the horse and the state of Idaho.  I'd like to think there is an NFCC argument we (OK, I) can advance. I also really busted my butt to get that image. I do want this article to go FA more than I need the license plate to stay, but in general I, for one am a bit tired of having to dumb down longer articles and remove useful images to get them to pass FA review, which at times I think awards form over substance.  I know I'm ranting, and I'm very OK with making sure the images pass muster, but I'd rather see the article stay GA than get trashed. I think the longer content is worth fighting for.  But in spite of all my ranting, let me know how I can continue to be of more help than harm, too. I am still (by three edits) the #1 contributor to this article!  (grin) [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 18:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
262291 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262290 +++$+++ 262290 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.291779660E09 +++$+++ Like I said above, I've already sent an e-mail to User:Appaloosa, so we should hopefully hear back from him shortly. As for the image, images that don't pass copyright muster should really be removed anyway, FAC or not, it's just that we don't have enough copyright experts to monitor every article and so they focus on a few key areas. The criteria that Jappalang is concerned about is [[WP:NFCC]] #8, which states that non-free content should only be used when it \"significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding\". If you have a source which gives more \"critical commentary on the artistic design of the customized plates\" (Jappalang's wording), then we should add this in to the article in order to make a case for keeping the image. I really don't think that having to remove this image will result in the article being \"trashed\", and as I said above, poorly licensed images really need to be removed anyway, FAC or not. I think the solution here is to work on image licensing and get more properly licensed images on Commons, not to avoid FAC.  +++$+++ :Like I said above, I've already sent an e-mail to User:Appaloosa, so we should hopefully hear back from him shortly. As for the image, images that don't pass copyright muster should really be removed anyway, FAC or not, it's just that we don't have enough copyright experts to monitor every article and so they focus on a few key areas. The criteria that Jappalang is concerned about is [[WP:NFCC]] #8, which states that non-free content should only be used when it "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding". If you have a source which gives more "critical commentary on the artistic design of the customized plates" (Jappalang's wording), then we should add this in to the article in order to make a case for keeping the image. I really don't think that having to remove this image will result in the article being "trashed", and as I said above, poorly licensed images really need to be removed anyway, FAC or not. I think the solution here is to work on image licensing and get more properly licensed images on Commons, not to avoid FAC. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 19:41, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
262292 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262290 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-09 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.291933920E09 +++$+++ As an update, I've been in contact with User:Appaloosas, have confirmed that he holds the copyright on all three images, and have asked him to send an e-mail to OTRS confirming this. So hopefully those three images should be good to go soon.  +++$+++ :::As an update, I've been in contact with User:Appaloosas, have confirmed that he holds the copyright on all three images, and have asked him to send an e-mail to OTRS confirming this. So hopefully those three images should be good to go soon. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 14:32, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
262293 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262290 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-09 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.291964400E09 +++$+++ Oh Hooray!  I hope it all works out!  They are so very nice and it would be good to get all the images by that user approved for any wiki-project.   +++$+++ ::::Oh Hooray!  I hope it all works out!  They are so very nice and it would be good to get all the images by that user approved for any wiki-project.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 23:00, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
262294 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262290 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.292085120E09 +++$+++ Dana, best advise Bill that he should forward Dodds' permission (or transfer of rights) to the OTRS team (for THIEL 619.jpg).  Physical ownership is not the same as copyright ownership, nor is hiring Dodds to take the photographs unless there is a formal agreement of the transfer (work for hire).   +++$+++ ::::: Dana, best advise Bill that he should forward Dodds' permission (or transfer of rights) to the OTRS team (for THIEL 619.jpg).  Physical ownership is not the same as copyright ownership, nor is hiring Dodds to take the photographs unless there is a formal agreement of the transfer (work for hire).  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 08:32, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
262295 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262290 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-15 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.292450880E09 +++$+++ All three images now have OTRS confirmation, so I have struck them out above. Please let me know if further work needs to be done on these.  +++$+++ ::::::All three images now have OTRS confirmation, so I have struck them out above. Please let me know if further work needs to be done on these. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 14:08, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
262296 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262290 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.294068540E09 +++$+++ Dana, [[:File:THIEL 619.jpg]] still seems a bit problematic.  Appaloosa.org cannot be the \"author\" since they have personally stated it is Darrell Dodds.  There should be a clear differentiation between author and license holder if Dodds have transferred his copyright to Appaloosa.org.   +++$+++ ::::::: Dana, [[:File:THIEL 619.jpg]] still seems a bit problematic.  Appaloosa.org cannot be the "author" since they have personally stated it is Darrell Dodds.  There should be a clear differentiation between author and license holder if Dodds have transferred his copyright to Appaloosa.org.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 07:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
262297 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262290 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.294102080E09 +++$+++ I've tweaked the image description to hopefully make the distinction between author and license holder more clear. User:Appaloosas does hold the copyright, that's what the OTRS verified, so hopefully the new arrangement works.  +++$+++ :::::::: I've tweaked the image description to hopefully make the distinction between author and license holder more clear. User:Appaloosas does hold the copyright, that's what the OTRS verified, so hopefully the new arrangement works. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 16:48, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

148 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 148 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-25 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.180117860E09 +++$+++ Did you know that, instead of {{Low|Category:Birmingham Canal Navigations}} you can link to a category as [[:Category:Birmingham Canal Navigations]]? Note the leading colon, in the source-code.  +++$+++ Did you know that, instead of {{Low|Category:Birmingham Canal Navigations}} you can link to a category as [[:Category:Birmingham Canal Navigations]]? Note the leading colon, in the source-code. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 11:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
149 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 148 +++$+++ 148 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.180118400E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Yes I did know. If you are refering to my user page then I tend to use a template to make the link one-way so that there is no distracting link back to user or talk pages in an article's (or category)'s ''what links here''. If you are talking about something else then please explain ?? :)  +++$+++ :Thanks. Yes I did know. If you are refering to my user page then I tend to use a template to make the link one-way so that there is no distracting link back to user or talk pages in an article's (or category)'s ''what links here''. If you are talking about something else then please explain ?? :) [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 11:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
150 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 148 +++$+++ 149 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.180128300E09 +++$+++ No, just the former.  +++$+++ ::No, just the former. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 14:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

152 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-26 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.180245300E09 +++$+++ I think you'll like this [http:\/\/uk.groups.yahoo.com\/group\/CanalScapeBCN\/]; Ray Shill posts there regularly.  +++$+++ I think you'll like this [http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanalScapeBCN/]; Ray Shill posts there regularly. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 22:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
153 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 152 +++$+++ 152 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.180288380E09 +++$+++ Yes. I think I will. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Yes. I think I will. Thanks. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 10:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

174788 +++$+++ Coemgenus +++$+++ Harej +++$+++ 174788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.312012500E09 +++$+++ This bot keeps listing that [[Chester A. Arthur]] is being reviewed.  It is not.  It was, but then we deleted the review because the editor who started it had been very involved in writing the article.  How can I get the bot to stop?  -- +++$+++ This bot keeps listing that [[Chester A. Arthur]] is being reviewed.  It is not.  It was, but then we deleted the review because the editor who started it had been very involved in writing the article.  How can I get the bot to stop?  --[[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]] ([[User talk:Coemgenus|talk]]) 00:55, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
174789 +++$+++ harej +++$+++ Harej +++$+++ 174788 +++$+++ 174788 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.312019040E09 +++$+++ When the bot transcluded the review, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Chester_A._Arthur&diff=442073326&oldid=442067727 it also marked the nomination as \"onreview\"]. I have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Chester_A._Arthur&diff=442142025&oldid=442123826 reversed that].  +++$+++ : When the bot transcluded the review, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chester_A._Arthur&diff=442073326&oldid=442067727 it also marked the nomination as "onreview"]. I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chester_A._Arthur&diff=442142025&oldid=442123826 reversed that]. [[User talk:Harej|''hare'']]&nbsp;'''j''' 02:44, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
174790 +++$+++ Coemgenus +++$+++ Harej +++$+++ 174788 +++$+++ 174789 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.312052340E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much.  -- +++$+++ ::Thanks very much.  --[[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]] ([[User talk:Coemgenus|talk]]) 11:59, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

154 +++$+++ Pyrotec +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-15 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.181951280E09 +++$+++ If you have a look at Broadbridge, page 68, there is a picture taken from Brass House Lane bridge of the pump house showing the two existing levels and some people walking on the first summit of the original level. His book was published in 1974. I certainly walked along there various times between 1973 and 1977 and I remember seeing lock gates almost completely buried. I agree that some (possibly a lot) of the top level was lost as a result of subsequent cutting of lower levels. I don't have time this month, but I'll try and find some slides. I should also have some of the Titford canal take at about the same time, i.e. before and after the 1970s restoration.  +++$+++ If you have a look at Broadbridge, page 68, there is a picture taken from Brass House Lane bridge of the pump house showing the two existing levels and some people walking on the first summit of the original level. His book was published in 1974. I certainly walked along there various times between 1973 and 1977 and I remember seeing lock gates almost completely buried. I agree that some (possibly a lot) of the top level was lost as a result of subsequent cutting of lower levels. I don't have time this month, but I'll try and find some slides. I should also have some of the Titford canal take at about the same time, i.e. before and after the 1970s restoration. [[User:Pyrotec|Pyrotec]] 16:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
155 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 154 +++$+++ 154 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.181953140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your answer. Will try to track down the book you mention. The dismantled locks were on the east side of the current Old Line. I was led to believe the original canal lurched to the west (and over Telford's work) in a gentle loop north of Brasshouse Lane bridge.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your answer. Will try to track down the book you mention. The dismantled locks were on the east side of the current Old Line. I was led to believe the original canal lurched to the west (and over Telford's work) in a gentle loop north of Brasshouse Lane bridge. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 17:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
156 +++$+++ Pyrotec +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 154 +++$+++ 155 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.181958300E09 +++$+++ I've looked Broadbridge and Hadfield - Canals of the West Midlands - since I wrote my reply. Both books say that the plan was to reduce the Smethwick top level by 18 foot, down to the Wolverhampton level, thereby eliminating three locks at each end of the summmit. They first duplicated the Smethwick locks (453 - 473 ft), then they dug a new canal to the south of the top summit, but 12 ft lower; and used the top summit to take away the spoil. The new canal was filled with water; that eliminated two locks at each end of the old summit, which were filled in. They then dug another new canal to the south, but 6 foot lower and used the 2nd canal to take away the spoil from the third canal. That eliminated the third lock at each end. These two books state that the top level was not destroyed, just the locks filled in. My memory is seeing only the top of the lock gates.  Broadbridge (page 84) says that the Spon Lane locks were brought to light in July 1969 and destroyed by drag line excavator when the ground was prepared for a motorway. Incidentally Hadfield shows a similar view between pages 96 and 97, but it was taken from the railway end of Brasshouse Lane bridge. I cannot at the moment remember if I saw locks at both ends of the summit. I could have been there in July 1969, but the memory I'm talking about was a boat hire over Christmas \/ New Year either 1973 or 1974; we went into a supermarket in Smethwick to buy food for 12 people. +++$+++ ::I've looked Broadbridge and Hadfield - Canals of the West Midlands - since I wrote my reply. Both books say that the plan was to reduce the Smethwick top level by 18 foot, down to the Wolverhampton level, thereby eliminating three locks at each end of the summmit. They first duplicated the Smethwick locks (453 - 473 ft), then they dug a new canal to the south of the top summit, but 12 ft lower; and used the top summit to take away the spoil. The new canal was filled with water; that eliminated two locks at each end of the old summit, which were filled in. They then dug another new canal to the south, but 6 foot lower and used the 2nd canal to take away the spoil from the third canal. That eliminated the third lock at each end. These two books state that the top level was not destroyed, just the locks filled in. My memory is seeing only the top of the lock gates.  Broadbridge (page 84) says that the Spon Lane locks were brought to light in July 1969 and destroyed by drag line excavator when the ground was prepared for a motorway. Incidentally Hadfield shows a similar view between pages 96 and 97, but it was taken from the railway end of Brasshouse Lane bridge. I cannot at the moment remember if I saw locks at both ends of the summit. I could have been there in July 1969, but the memory I'm talking about was a boat hire over Christmas / New Year either 1973 or 1974; we went into a supermarket in Smethwick to buy food for 12 people.[[User:Pyrotec|Pyrotec]] 18:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
157 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 154 +++$+++ 156 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.181970480E09 +++$+++ Many thanks. I must read these.   +++$+++ :::Many thanks. I must read these.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 22:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
158 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 154 +++$+++ 157 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.184900340E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for referring me to Hadfield and Broadbridge. I am reading them with interest. However I have now found a 1999 reference in Ray Shill's ''Birmingham Canals'', ISBN 0-7509-2077-7, p33, also with picture, which disputes the meaning of the path trodden in Broadbridge & Hadfield. \"The footpath on the far right ... has been taken by some historians to be the route of the original 1769 canal before the summit was lowered ... It is now accepted that the original course curved across the route of the New Main Line through, or near, what is now the engine house, before swinging back on to the present course. The construction of the deep cutting ... 1826-9 caused a straightening and diversion of the Old Main Line at this point.\". Impossible to prove by archaeological excavation of the air above the New Line, but very plausible from looking at a map. Best wishes.   +++$+++ ::::Many thanks for referring me to Hadfield and Broadbridge. I am reading them with interest. However I have now found a 1999 reference in Ray Shill's ''Birmingham Canals'', ISBN 0-7509-2077-7, p33, also with picture, which disputes the meaning of the path trodden in Broadbridge & Hadfield. "The footpath on the far right ... has been taken by some historians to be the route of the original 1769 canal before the summit was lowered ... It is now accepted that the original course curved across the route of the New Main Line through, or near, what is now the engine house, before swinging back on to the present course. The construction of the deep cutting ... 1826-9 caused a straightening and diversion of the Old Main Line at this point.". Impossible to prove by archaeological excavation of the air above the New Line, but very plausible from looking at a map. Best wishes.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 19:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

262299 +++$+++ 86.157.195.116 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262299 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-11 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.292054640E09 +++$+++ Also we don't measure horses or ponies in individual inches. Its hands (hh = hands high) and centimetres. So thats two things you got wrong. This Wikipedia is not a one country website. Don't be reverting my changes. [[Special:Contributions\/86.157.195.116|86.157.195.116]] ( +++$+++ Also we don't measure horses or ponies in individual inches. Its hands (hh = hands high) and centimetres. So thats two things you got wrong. This Wikipedia is not a one country website. Don't be reverting my changes. [[Special:Contributions/86.157.195.116|86.157.195.116]] ([[User talk:86.157.195.116|talk]]) 00:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
262300 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262299 +++$+++ 262299 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.292058360E09 +++$+++ The template that you removed converts hands (and yes, I know what hh means) into both inches and centimeters. This is for the reading pleasure of editors from all countries - as you point out, this isn't a one country website. That's why we convert into both, not just one or the other. It doesn't really matter what country the horse and rider pair competes for, we change into both.  +++$+++ :The template that you removed converts hands (and yes, I know what hh means) into both inches and centimeters. This is for the reading pleasure of editors from all countries - as you point out, this isn't a one country website. That's why we convert into both, not just one or the other. It doesn't really matter what country the horse and rider pair competes for, we change into both. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 01:06, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
262301 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262299 +++$+++ 262300 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.292067480E09 +++$+++ First off 86, you need to learn the rules of wikipedia and not attack those of us who actually DO know what we are talking about.   I must also add that the UK used imperial measurements in the time of Stroller.  I might also note that team GBR is a modern construction for international competition, the rules noted in 1925 were not \"Team GBR\" as we understand it today.  Thus \"United Kingdom\" is proper in that context.  The article is about the worldwide sport, not just the UK (or GBR, if you will)  +++$+++ ::First off 86, you need to learn the rules of wikipedia and not attack those of us who actually DO know what we are talking about.   I must also add that the UK used imperial measurements in the time of Stroller.  I might also note that team GBR is a modern construction for international competition, the rules noted in 1925 were not "Team GBR" as we understand it today.  Thus "United Kingdom" is proper in that context.  The article is about the worldwide sport, not just the UK (or GBR, if you will) [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 03:38, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

524444 +++$+++ Travb +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-29 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.191118260E09 +++$+++ Do  you think I should file this case?  +++$+++ Do  you think I should file this case? [[User:Travb|Travb]] ([[User talk:Travb|talk]]) 19:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
524445 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524444 +++$+++ 524444 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.191126180E09 +++$+++ You can: the similarities are large, the contention has been going on for a long time, and the last edits should be recent enough. However, is it really going to help much? Neither {{user|Mobile 01}} nor {{user|203.49.235.50}} is very active, the last fight either was in seems to have been weeks ago. -- +++$+++ : You can: the similarities are large, the contention has been going on for a long time, and the last edits should be recent enough. However, is it really going to help much? Neither {{user|Mobile 01}} nor {{user|203.49.235.50}} is very active, the last fight either was in seems to have been weeks ago. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 21:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
524446 +++$+++ Travb +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524444 +++$+++ 524445 +++$+++ 2007-09-30 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.191137640E09 +++$+++ True about how it will not help much. I was just a little frustrated by the users recent comments about me. I won't do anything with it now. Thanks Anon.  +++$+++ ::True about how it will not help much. I was just a little frustrated by the users recent comments about me. I won't do anything with it now. Thanks Anon. [[User:Travb|Travb]] ([[User talk:Travb|talk]]) 00:34, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

262302 +++$+++ Schaffman +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-12 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.292199240E09 +++$+++ Hi. I saw your tag on the Mars discussion page and wanted to touch base. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, but I've been working on several Mars articles for a couple of months now. In general, I've found many of the existing Mars articles to be in need of editing. Frequently, they lack scientific rigor and state incorrect or misleading facts. I'm trying to clean these problems up as I find them, without unnecessarily stepping on anyone's toes. I know these articles take a lot of work and appreciate the time and effort of those who've worked on them. No one can know everything about Mars, and new facts and ideas come in constantly. Yours,  +++$+++ Hi. I saw your tag on the Mars discussion page and wanted to touch base. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, but I've been working on several Mars articles for a couple of months now. In general, I've found many of the existing Mars articles to be in need of editing. Frequently, they lack scientific rigor and state incorrect or misleading facts. I'm trying to clean these problems up as I find them, without unnecessarily stepping on anyone's toes. I know these articles take a lot of work and appreciate the time and effort of those who've worked on them. No one can know everything about Mars, and new facts and ideas come in constantly. Yours, [[User:Schaffman|Schaffman]] ([[User talk:Schaffman|talk]]) 16:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
262303 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262302 +++$+++ 262302 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.292208960E09 +++$+++ Hi Schaffman and thanks for the note. It's great that you're working on Mars-related articles. It looks like there's just one cleanup tag still on the Mars article (a citation needed tag in the infobox). Older FAs also often need a general cleanup and updating as new scholarship is developed, so it's always nice to have new people interested in helping with this. Please let me know if you have any questions,  +++$+++ :Hi Schaffman and thanks for the note. It's great that you're working on Mars-related articles. It looks like there's just one cleanup tag still on the Mars article (a citation needed tag in the infobox). Older FAs also often need a general cleanup and updating as new scholarship is developed, so it's always nice to have new people interested in helping with this. Please let me know if you have any questions, [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 18:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

159 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-16 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.182021600E09 +++$+++ I really like the table you've added to [[Titford Canal]], and the \"{{tl|PoIgb}}\" templates, but i do find the text too small to read. Could you retain 100% text size, please? Also, please add them to the [[WP:UF|microformats project page]], with a description? I've added the project banner to their talk pages, and write3n some documentation - please check it. I'd also suggest making \"OS Grid Ref\" and \"notes\" into separate columns (you can use <code>class=\"note\"<\/code> on both).  +++$+++ I really like the table you've added to [[Titford Canal]], and the "{{tl|PoIgb}}" templates, but i do find the text too small to read. Could you retain 100% text size, please? Also, please add them to the [[WP:UF|microformats project page]], with a description? I've added the project banner to their talk pages, and write3n some documentation - please check it. I'd also suggest making "OS Grid Ref" and "notes" into separate columns (you can use <code>class="note"</code> on both). [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 12:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
160 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 159 +++$+++ 159 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.182027720E09 +++$+++ see also {{tl|PoI}} and the related {{tl|PoIx}}, both for global use.  +++$+++ :see also {{tl|PoI}} and the related {{tl|PoIx}}, both for global use. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 14:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
161 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 159 +++$+++ 160 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.182043080E09 +++$+++ Now 100%, and I've added the Notes column.  +++$+++ ::Now 100%, and I've added the Notes column. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 18:18, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
162 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 159 +++$+++ 161 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.182045840E09 +++$+++ Thank you!  +++$+++ :::Thank you! [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 19:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
163 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 159 +++$+++ 161 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.182046740E09 +++$+++ I made the OS grid ref a link, too.  +++$+++ :::I made the OS grid ref a link, too. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 19:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
164 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 159 +++$+++ 163 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.182047220E09 +++$+++ I intentionally didn't do that as a six figure grid ref is too coarse to identify points of interest and will always point to a different feature than the WGS84 coordinates which are already linked. There can only be one ''correct'' grid reference, so that might as well be the international one.  +++$+++ ::::I intentionally didn't do that as a six figure grid ref is too coarse to identify points of interest and will always point to a different feature than the WGS84 coordinates which are already linked. There can only be one ''correct'' grid reference, so that might as well be the international one. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 19:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
165 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 159 +++$+++ 164 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.182047520E09 +++$+++ Fair point; I've reverted myself. Is the documentation OK, BTW?  +++$+++ :::::Fair point; I've reverted myself. Is the documentation OK, BTW? [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 19:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
166 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 159 +++$+++ 165 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.182051300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the documentation. I've added a bit more, and removed display=title, which is pretty meaningless as it doesn't cause the coordinates to appear in the table.  +++$+++ ::::::Thanks for the documentation. I've added a bit more, and removed display=title, which is pretty meaningless as it doesn't cause the coordinates to appear in the table. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 20:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
167 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 159 +++$+++ 166 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.182052980E09 +++$+++ OK. Your \"title\" point is well observed. I've done more tweaking, explained in my edit summaries.  +++$+++ :::::::OK. Your "title" point is well observed. I've done more tweaking, explained in my edit summaries. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] 21:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

262305 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-17 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.292595000E09 +++$+++ I don't know if it's a wiki-birthday or a wiki-anniversary, but congrats on three of 'em!   +++$+++ I don't know if it's a wiki-birthday or a wiki-anniversary, but congrats on three of 'em!  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 06:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
262306 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262305 +++$+++ 262305 +++$+++ 2010-12-17 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.292617020E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I suddenly realized it was about that time of year, went to check, and discovered I'd passed the three year mark a few days ago. My, how time flies!  +++$+++ : Thank you! I suddenly realized it was about that time of year, went to check, and discovered I'd passed the three year mark a few days ago. My, how time flies! [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 12:17, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
262307 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262305 +++$+++ 262306 +++$+++ 2010-12-17 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.292643180E09 +++$+++ Look at the syntax I use on my badge and also the userbox for how long I've been on wiki.  They can automatically (or at least semi-automatically) adjust, which is kind of fun!   +++$+++ ::Look at the syntax I use on my badge and also the userbox for how long I've been on wiki.  They can automatically (or at least semi-automatically) adjust, which is kind of fun!  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 19:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

584851 +++$+++ Everyking +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.202900040E09 +++$+++ Yes, today's my four-year wiki-anniversary. Thanks for noticing that. Do I want to run for RfA again? Absolutely, but I feel I don't stand a chance as long as there are still arbitration restrictions on me. Right now I've got an appeal that the ArbCom says it is reviewing; if you'd like to put in a word for me, that'd mean a lot.  +++$+++ Yes, today's my four-year wiki-anniversary. Thanks for noticing that. Do I want to run for RfA again? Absolutely, but I feel I don't stand a chance as long as there are still arbitration restrictions on me. Right now I've got an appeal that the ArbCom says it is reviewing; if you'd like to put in a word for me, that'd mean a lot. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] ([[User talk:Everyking|talk]]) 02:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
584852 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584851 +++$+++ 584851 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.202903400E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) I'll be glad when you do get to run at RfA again once your sanctions are lifted; I think you'd make a great admin again.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. :) I'll be glad when you do get to run at RfA again once your sanctions are lifted; I think you'd make a great admin again. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 03:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
584853 +++$+++ Everyking +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584851 +++$+++ 584852 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.203126840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the word on RfAr. Greatly appreciated.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the word on RfAr. Greatly appreciated. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] ([[User talk:Everyking|talk]]) 17:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
584854 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584851 +++$+++ 584853 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.203127020E09 +++$+++ You're welcome: I would have been disappointed if ArbCom hadn't done the appeal in the open, otherwise I may not have been able to write that. I was hoping to say something for you, and I'm glad I got the chance.  +++$+++ :::You're welcome: I would have been disappointed if ArbCom hadn't done the appeal in the open, otherwise I may not have been able to write that. I was hoping to say something for you, and I'm glad I got the chance. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

262310 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-23 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.293117960E09 +++$+++ Dear Dana, how are you? I believe we can close the above FAR, as every issue have been resolved per the talk page and the PR assessments, and it is still clean and professional to retain its bronze star. AS a delegate, please do the needful. \u2014 <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ Dear Dana, how are you? I believe we can close the above FAR, as every issue have been resolved per the talk page and the PR assessments, and it is still clean and professional to retain its bronze star. AS a delegate, please do the needful. — <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 07:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
262311 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262310 +++$+++ 262310 +++$+++ 2010-12-23 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.293147780E09 +++$+++ Thanks Legolas. I've actually just deleted the page, since there was really nothing there to archive. However, I would suggest getting in touch with the nominator of the FAR to make sure that ''all'' of his concerns have been addressed, since it doesn't appear that he's commented since just after starting the review.  +++$+++ :Thanks Legolas. I've actually just deleted the page, since there was really nothing there to archive. However, I would suggest getting in touch with the nominator of the FAR to make sure that ''all'' of his concerns have been addressed, since it doesn't appear that he's commented since just after starting the review. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 15:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
262312 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262310 +++$+++ 262311 +++$+++ 2010-12-24 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.293209940E09 +++$+++ Yes DAna, I confirmed with Xwomanizerx, she's fine. It was just a misundestanding of the nomination procedure. Oh well, part of life eh? Merry Christmas to you. \u2014 <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ ::Yes DAna, I confirmed with Xwomanizerx, she's fine. It was just a misundestanding of the nomination procedure. Oh well, part of life eh? Merry Christmas to you. — <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 08:59, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

611697 +++$+++ Glen S +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611697 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-23 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.164327600E09 +++$+++ '''You're very welcome!''' ...Anytime!<br><br>Glen has smiled at you! Smiles promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. <small>Smile at others by adding {{tls|smile}}, {{tls|smile2}} or {{tls|smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.<\/small> Happy editing!  +++$+++ '''You're very welcome!''' ...Anytime!<br><br>Glen has smiled at you! Smiles promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. <small>Smile at others by adding {{tls|smile}}, {{tls|smile2}} or {{tls|smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.</small> Happy editing! [[User talk:Glen S|'''<font color="#FFFF51" style="background:#535353;">&nbsp;Glen&nbsp;</font>''']] 16:20, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
611698 +++$+++ Kyo cat +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611697 +++$+++ 611697 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.164350460E09 +++$+++ Hey, hope you have a great Thanksgiving! Turkey sure is tasty isn't it? Well, that turkey up there isn't too happy, but whether you eat Turkey or not, have a great day! \xa1Adios amigo!<font face=\"Papyrus\">'''[[User:Kyo cat\/Esperanza|<span style=\"color:#0c0\">K<\/span>]] +++$+++ :Hey, hope you have a great Thanksgiving! Turkey sure is tasty isn't it? Well, that turkey up there isn't too happy, but whether you eat Turkey or not, have a great day! ¡Adios amigo!<font face="Papyrus">'''[[User:Kyo cat/Esperanza|<span style="color:#0c0">K</span>]][[User:Kyo cat|<span style="color:#f90">yo cat</span>]]'''</font><sup>[[User talk:Kyo cat|meow!]]</sup> 22:41, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

524456 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524456 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-02 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.191382200E09 +++$+++ I think the twins' agency or publicist has been poking into the article...will take a deeper look at it later if I get some time and a good connection.  +++$+++ I think the twins' agency or publicist has been poking into the article...will take a deeper look at it later if I get some time and a good connection. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 20:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
524457 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524456 +++$+++ 524456 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.191382860E09 +++$+++ Either here or on your talk page is fine; I read it there too. No problem, sometimes our policies can be complicated, no one can be expected to know everything at once. Good luck! :-) -- +++$+++ : Either here or on your talk page is fine; I read it there too. No problem, sometimes our policies can be complicated, no one can be expected to know everything at once. Good luck! :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 20:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

262313 +++$+++ GamerPro64 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262313 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-25 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.293344580E09 +++$+++ Hi Dana. Happy holidays. Is it O.k if I can make another FAR early? My FAR review for [[Salsa Music]] hasn't had a comment on it for nearly two weeks.  +++$+++ Hi Dana. Happy holidays. Is it O.k if I can make another FAR early? My FAR review for [[Salsa Music]] hasn't had a comment on it for nearly two weeks. [[User:GamerPro64|GamerPro64]] ([[User talk:GamerPro64|talk]]) 22:23, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
262314 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262313 +++$+++ 262313 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.293348060E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's fine to go ahead, as long as you've notified the editors on the talk page in advance.  +++$+++ :Yes, that's fine to go ahead, as long as you've notified the editors on the talk page in advance. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 23:21, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
262315 +++$+++ GamerPro64 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262313 +++$+++ 262314 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.293349800E09 +++$+++ ... Crap. I knew I forgot something. Nevermind.  +++$+++ ::... Crap. I knew I forgot something. Nevermind. [[User:GamerPro64|GamerPro64]] ([[User talk:GamerPro64|talk]]) 23:50, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

171 +++$+++ ShakespeareFan00 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 171 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-28 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.183094940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:ShakespeareFan00|ShakespeareFan00]] 22:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
172 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 171 +++$+++ 171 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.183095240E09 +++$+++ Have done so for these two. What is wrong with the declaration in PD-self which states: \"I, the creator of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. ...\"  +++$+++ :Have done so for these two. What is wrong with the declaration in PD-self which states: "I, the creator of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. ..." [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 22:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
173 +++$+++ ShakespeareFan00 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 171 +++$+++ 172 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.183135260E09 +++$+++ Nothing, which is why I've struck thru the previous comments.  +++$+++ :: Nothing, which is why I've struck thru the previous comments. [[User:ShakespeareFan00|ShakespeareFan00]] 09:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
174 +++$+++ Pyrotec +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 171 +++$+++ 173 +++$+++ 2007-09-09 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.189384020E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed your comment about editing svg files in the [[Template talk:Waterways legend#River Navigations]]. It was something I tried yesterday, but it failed. I normally use Mozilla Firefox, but yesterday I loaded the SVG plugin into Explorer. Found the uKRZu icon, got the svg code, copied it to Wordpad and changed from strong red (#be3d2c) to pale red (#d77f7e) and saved the file to my harddisk, as utKRZu. (I wanted an open canal \/ closed railway icon). If I saved it as a .txt file I could upload it to Wikipedia but there was only the chequered background; and if I saved it as an .svg file to my harddisk Wikipedia would not upload it. Any suggestions as to what I'm doing wrong. +++$+++ :::Hi, I noticed your comment about editing svg files in the [[Template talk:Waterways legend#River Navigations]]. It was something I tried yesterday, but it failed. I normally use Mozilla Firefox, but yesterday I loaded the SVG plugin into Explorer. Found the uKRZu icon, got the svg code, copied it to Wordpad and changed from strong red (#be3d2c) to pale red (#d77f7e) and saved the file to my harddisk, as utKRZu. (I wanted an open canal / closed railway icon). If I saved it as a .txt file I could upload it to Wikipedia but there was only the chequered background; and if I saved it as an .svg file to my harddisk Wikipedia would not upload it. Any suggestions as to what I'm doing wrong.[[User:Pyrotec|Pyrotec]] 17:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
175 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 171 +++$+++ 174 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.189440660E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure how your required icon would be different from ueKRZu? Doesn't ''ut'' mean dotted blue? Good luck.   +++$+++ ::::I'm not sure how your required icon would be different from ueKRZu? Doesn't ''ut'' mean dotted blue? Good luck.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 09:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
176 +++$+++ Pyrotec +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 171 +++$+++ 175 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.189444980E09 +++$+++ Thanks. You're right its not needed because I was trying to make ueKRZu, but I did not know it was there, as it was not in the template at the time. It was wordpad that I used. I've now put Inkscape on my machine and all the copies on my machine appear to display correctly. So I'm fairly confident that its the upload onto wikipedia and\/or wiki-format that is wrong. +++$+++ :::::Thanks. You're right its not needed because I was trying to make ueKRZu, but I did not know it was there, as it was not in the template at the time. It was wordpad that I used. I've now put Inkscape on my machine and all the copies on my machine appear to display correctly. So I'm fairly confident that its the upload onto wikipedia and/or wiki-format that is wrong.[[User:Pyrotec|Pyrotec]] 10:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

262316 +++$+++ Tpbradbury +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262316 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-27 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.293517020E09 +++$+++ thanks, i've now voted for delist at FARC  +++$+++ thanks, i've now voted for delist at FARC [[User:Tpbradbury|Tom B]] ([[User talk:Tpbradbury|talk]]) 22:17, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
262317 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262316 +++$+++ 262316 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.294042860E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much!  +++$+++ :Thank you very much! [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 00:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

262318 +++$+++ Agne27 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-02 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.294040940E09 +++$+++ Hey Dana! I started the Chateau Grand Traverse article and I can see some really good [[WP:DYK]] potential with it (1st Michigan ice wine, served at George H.W. Bush's inauguration, etc). It could possible even be a lead DYK selection if we can get a picture of a Chateau Grand Traverse ice wine. I don't know how close you are to the winery and how much of an inconvenience it would be, but if it is possible, any illustration to the article would be helpful. If not, no worries. :) Also, if you know of any relevant Michigan-related article that it could be linked to that would help make the article less of an [[WP:ORPHAN]].  +++$+++ Hey Dana! I started the Chateau Grand Traverse article and I can see some really good [[WP:DYK]] potential with it (1st Michigan ice wine, served at George H.W. Bush's inauguration, etc). It could possible even be a lead DYK selection if we can get a picture of a Chateau Grand Traverse ice wine. I don't know how close you are to the winery and how much of an inconvenience it would be, but if it is possible, any illustration to the article would be helpful. If not, no worries. :) Also, if you know of any relevant Michigan-related article that it could be linked to that would help make the article less of an [[WP:ORPHAN]]. [[User:Agne27 |Agne]][[Special:Contributions/Agne27|<sup>Cheese</sup>]]/[[User Talk:Agne27|<sup>Wine</sup>]] 23:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
262319 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262318 +++$+++ 262318 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.294042800E09 +++$+++ Hi Agne! I'm not sure how well I'll be able to do with this request within the time frame of a DYK. I might be able to get some shots of their wines tomorrow, but I won't be able to get up to the vineyards before next weekend. Also, I'm not sure how available their ice wine is, and at $70 a bottle I don't really have enough disposable income to buy a bottle just to take a picture of it :) I will see what I can do with their other wines tomorrow, and will get to the vineyards ASAP - it is winter here, though, so the images will most likely be nothing but trellis... I realize this answer is a bit wishy-washy, but Michigan in January is not really the time and place for wine tours :)  +++$+++ :Hi Agne! I'm not sure how well I'll be able to do with this request within the time frame of a DYK. I might be able to get some shots of their wines tomorrow, but I won't be able to get up to the vineyards before next weekend. Also, I'm not sure how available their ice wine is, and at $70 a bottle I don't really have enough disposable income to buy a bottle just to take a picture of it :) I will see what I can do with their other wines tomorrow, and will get to the vineyards ASAP - it is winter here, though, so the images will most likely be nothing but trellis... I realize this answer is a bit wishy-washy, but Michigan in January is not really the time and place for wine tours :) [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 00:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
262320 +++$+++ Agne27 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262318 +++$+++ 262319 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.294044660E09 +++$+++ LOL...yeah don't buy a bottle of wine just for the picture (Though, my trick is often to take a picture with my iPhone of the wine at the store ;P ) Again, no worries and I hear you on the January part. Not many photo ops in the great Pacific Northwest either. :)  +++$+++ ::LOL...yeah don't buy a bottle of wine just for the picture (Though, my trick is often to take a picture with my iPhone of the wine at the store ;P ) Again, no worries and I hear you on the January part. Not many photo ops in the great Pacific Northwest either. :) [[User:Agne27 |Agne]][[Special:Contributions/Agne27|<sup>Cheese</sup>]]/[[User Talk:Agne27|<sup>Wine</sup>]] 00:51, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
262321 +++$+++ Agne27 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262318 +++$+++ 262320 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.294045620E09 +++$+++ Heh, I think I'm going to go with a pic of [[:File:George H. W. Bush, President of the United States, 1989 official portrait.jpg|Bush himself]] and see how that flies. :) Right now I just have some generic illustrations but I figure we can always improve them whenever better pics come on. Given how variable DYK can be, it might be featured in a couple days or over a week and half later. You never know.  +++$+++ :::Heh, I think I'm going to go with a pic of [[:File:George H. W. Bush, President of the United States, 1989 official portrait.jpg|Bush himself]] and see how that flies. :) Right now I just have some generic illustrations but I figure we can always improve them whenever better pics come on. Given how variable DYK can be, it might be featured in a couple days or over a week and half later. You never know. [[User:Agne27 |Agne]][[Special:Contributions/Agne27|<sup>Cheese</sup>]]/[[User Talk:Agne27|<sup>Wine</sup>]] 01:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

524463 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-03 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.191453480E09 +++$+++ Dear AnonEMouse, thank you for your message. I was wondering if you could be knid enough to upload the image. I have been on the verge of quitting the Pedia after being discouraged with the situation that is going on in the reassement of \"[[Hispanic Admirals in the United States Navy]]\".  +++$+++ Dear AnonEMouse, thank you for your message. I was wondering if you could be knid enough to upload the image. I have been on the verge of quitting the Pedia after being discouraged with the situation that is going on in the reassement of "[[Hispanic Admirals in the United States Navy]]". [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 16:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
524464 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524463 +++$+++ 524463 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.191455640E09 +++$+++ All right, I'll make the requests. From my experience it takes a couple of days to make the request and get the response, so assuming the second person I ask says yes, we should have a new image in a week or so. For the other thing you mean this: [[Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment#Hispanic_Admirals_in_the_United_States_Navy]]? Let me look, we can't have a FA writer getting discouraged enough to leave just like that! :-)-- +++$+++ : All right, I'll make the requests. From my experience it takes a couple of days to make the request and get the response, so assuming the second person I ask says yes, we should have a new image in a week or so. For the other thing you mean this: [[Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment#Hispanic_Admirals_in_the_United_States_Navy]]? Let me look, we can't have a FA writer getting discouraged enough to leave just like that! :-)--[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
524465 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524463 +++$+++ 524464 +++$+++ 2007-10-04 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.191540600E09 +++$+++ Looking good for the image - the owner of http:\/\/flickr.com\/photos\/telstar\/47854252\/ says he is a registered Wikipedian himself and will be glad to add the picture to the article himself later today. Maybe even two pictures if we're lucky. That's the first time that happened to me, that I met someone who says \"sure, but why don't I do it myself\". :-) -- +++$+++ :: Looking good for the image - the owner of http://flickr.com/photos/telstar/47854252/ says he is a registered Wikipedian himself and will be glad to add the picture to the article himself later today. Maybe even two pictures if we're lucky. That's the first time that happened to me, that I met someone who says "sure, but why don't I do it myself". :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
524466 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524463 +++$+++ 524464 +++$+++ 2007-10-04 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.191544200E09 +++$+++ As for the Good article reassessment, that seems to be bobbing and weaving, I'm not sure what the focus of the objection is. At first it seems like it was that there is no such thing as a Hispanic which is ridiculous. Then it seems like it was that the intersection of Hispanic and Admiral isn't notable, which is only marginally less silly. Then it seems the issue was with sourcing, which I could do something about (I added a specific link to the New York Times 1911 article) but then I read it again, and it seems the issue was that this is a list and not an article, and I don't know much about lists. I think the whole reassessment should be restarted until the objectors become clear on their complaints. I'll go say that there. -- +++$+++ :: As for the Good article reassessment, that seems to be bobbing and weaving, I'm not sure what the focus of the objection is. At first it seems like it was that there is no such thing as a Hispanic which is ridiculous. Then it seems like it was that the intersection of Hispanic and Admiral isn't notable, which is only marginally less silly. Then it seems the issue was with sourcing, which I could do something about (I added a specific link to the New York Times 1911 article) but then I read it again, and it seems the issue was that this is a list and not an article, and I don't know much about lists. I think the whole reassessment should be restarted until the objectors become clear on their complaints. I'll go say that there. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

177 +++$+++ ShakespeareFan00 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-29 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.183135260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:ShakespeareFan00|ShakespeareFan00]] 09:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
178 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 177 +++$+++ 177 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 09:48:00 +++$+++ 1.183135680E09 +++$+++ I am not actually the originator of the canal mapping effort, although I have added a few icons and one big map ({{Low|BCN Main Line}}) and a much smaller one. I don't have any relevent canal maps that show distances or depths but the mapping templates have room for this if known. They are based on railway map templates which have been extensively used on the English, and originally, German Wikipedias.  +++$+++ :I am not actually the originator of the canal mapping effort, although I have added a few icons and one big map ({{Low|BCN Main Line}}) and a much smaller one. I don't have any relevent canal maps that show distances or depths but the mapping templates have room for this if known. They are based on railway map templates which have been extensively used on the English, and originally, German Wikipedias. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 09:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

262322 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262322 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-03 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.294046160E09 +++$+++ Hey Dana, what's the official position on Helium.com as a reliable source.  (generally and for horse articles specifically) We have a person from the Guild of Copy Editors doing some work on [[Tokara pony]] and I don't want to discourage the effort, but s\/he put in a Helium footnote, so not sure that's OK or not so good.  Thoughts?  +++$+++ Hey Dana, what's the official position on Helium.com as a reliable source.  (generally and for horse articles specifically) We have a person from the Guild of Copy Editors doing some work on [[Tokara pony]] and I don't want to discourage the effort, but s/he put in a Helium footnote, so not sure that's OK or not so good.  Thoughts? [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 01:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
262323 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262322 +++$+++ 262322 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.294055040E09 +++$+++ In general, I think it's regarded as similar to about.com - it depends on the author (you can click on the author name and it takes you to their bio). In this case, I would say not reliable. The author's bio is \"I am a stay at home Army wife with a bachelor's degree in English and master's degrees in social work and public health.\" which gives absolutely no reason that she should be considered a reliable, expert source on a rare Japanese pony breed, although I would be inclined to think any articles she wrote on public health and social work were good enough for at least a GA. I need to head to bed soon, so don't want to get involved in that article tonight. Could you post a note for the editor and I'll lurk and enter the discussion if needed? Thanks,  +++$+++ :In general, I think it's regarded as similar to about.com - it depends on the author (you can click on the author name and it takes you to their bio). In this case, I would say not reliable. The author's bio is "I am a stay at home Army wife with a bachelor's degree in English and master's degrees in social work and public health." which gives absolutely no reason that she should be considered a reliable, expert source on a rare Japanese pony breed, although I would be inclined to think any articles she wrote on public health and social work were good enough for at least a GA. I need to head to bed soon, so don't want to get involved in that article tonight. Could you post a note for the editor and I'll lurk and enter the discussion if needed? Thanks, [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 03:44, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

179 +++$+++ Woodym555 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-10 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.184117820E09 +++$+++ Hello, i would like to ask a question or favour. Do you happen to have any free use images of King Edwards Birmingham from when it was at New Street. I ask because i am trying to update the article and an image would be most helpful and i ask you because of you various image contributions in the past, in particular the old KEHS picture. Thankyou  +++$+++ Hello, i would like to ask a question or favour. Do you happen to have any free use images of King Edwards Birmingham from when it was at New Street. I ask because i am trying to update the article and an image would be most helpful and i ask you because of you various image contributions in the past, in particular the old KEHS picture. Thankyou [[User:Woodym555|Woodym555]] 18:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
180 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 179 +++$+++ 179 +++$+++ 2007-07-10 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.184124600E09 +++$+++ I have loaded two imaged from an 1894 book onto Commons: [[:Image:KES Free Grammar School original without tower.jpg]] and [[:Image:KES Free Grammar School Charles Barry.jpg]].  +++$+++ :I have loaded two imaged from an 1894 book onto Commons: [[:Image:KES Free Grammar School original without tower.jpg]] and [[:Image:KES Free Grammar School Charles Barry.jpg]]. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 20:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
181 +++$+++ Woodym555 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 179 +++$+++ 180 +++$+++ 2007-07-10 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.184131320E09 +++$+++ Brilliant, exactly what i was looking for. Thankyou. I have added them into the article and i will expand some of the other sections in the coming days. Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::Brilliant, exactly what i was looking for. Thankyou. I have added them into the article and i will expand some of the other sections in the coming days. Thanks again. [[User:Woodym555|Woodym555]] 22:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

262324 +++$+++ Ealdgyth +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-03 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.294052340E09 +++$+++ Can I get you to move [[Forthere]] to [[Forthhere]], where it should be according to the third edition of the ''Handbook of British Chronology''? I just moved it to Forthere, but I typod. ARgh!  +++$+++ Can I get you to move [[Forthere]] to [[Forthhere]], where it should be according to the third edition of the ''Handbook of British Chronology''? I just moved it to Forthere, but I typod. ARgh! [[User:Ealdgyth|Ealdgyth]] - [[User talk:Ealdgyth|Talk]] 02:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
262325 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262324 +++$+++ 262324 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.294055340E09 +++$+++ I think I just did that right...? First time I've done a move over redirect, so may have just made it worse. Let me know if I've managed to delete the main page or something... :)  +++$+++ :I think I just did that right...? First time I've done a move over redirect, so may have just made it worse. Let me know if I've managed to delete the main page or something... :) [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 03:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
262326 +++$+++ Ealdgyth +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262324 +++$+++ 262325 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.294055400E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :: Thanks! [[User:Ealdgyth|Ealdgyth]] - [[User talk:Ealdgyth|Talk]] 03:50, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
262327 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262324 +++$+++ 262324 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.294134060E09 +++$+++ How unexpected! Thank you very much, Kirill!  +++$+++ :How unexpected! Thank you very much, Kirill! [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 01:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
262328 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262324 +++$+++ 262324 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.294215480E09 +++$+++ What a week for pretty things :) Thanks, Ian!  +++$+++ : What a week for pretty things :) Thanks, Ian! [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 00:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

524318 +++$+++ Eaglizard +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-11 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.189576380E09 +++$+++ Another matter altogether is [[UFO Phil]] - although the subject is clearly notable, this is just one of the finest bits of fluffery I've ''ever'' seen around these parts - unsurprisingly, written mostly by an \"anonymous\" IP. Or am I seeing it wrong? Your input, as always, is greatly appreciated. BTW, I'm not necessarily asking you to nom these for deletion, I'd be happy to learn how to do it myself. But then, if you would have anyways, feel free, it's not like I really care either way who does what. I do like to see things improve, tho. :) (Oh, and if you've never noticed it, have a look at a page that just screams 'edit war in progress' from the git-go: [[UFO]] - sad, no? And why is UFO Phil a see also? lol)  +++$+++ Another matter altogether is [[UFO Phil]] - although the subject is clearly notable, this is just one of the finest bits of fluffery I've ''ever'' seen around these parts - unsurprisingly, written mostly by an "anonymous" IP. Or am I seeing it wrong? Your input, as always, is greatly appreciated. BTW, I'm not necessarily asking you to nom these for deletion, I'd be happy to learn how to do it myself. But then, if you would have anyways, feel free, it's not like I really care either way who does what. I do like to see things improve, tho. :) (Oh, and if you've never noticed it, have a look at a page that just screams 'edit war in progress' from the git-go: [[UFO]] - sad, no? And why is UFO Phil a see also? lol) [[User:Eaglizard|Eaglizard]] 22:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
524319 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524318 +++$+++ 524318 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.189633140E09 +++$+++ [[UFO]] being an edit war in progress... well, yeah, what did you expect? :-)  I can similarly, even without looking, tell you that [[Iraq War]], [[George W. Bush]], [[Abortion]], and [[Scientology]] aren't going to be the most calm and peaceful articles either. It's the nature of the subject. I looked at it, and it wasn't actually as bad as it could have been, it has lots of information and references, and nice pictures, a few {{tl|fact}} tags are not so bad. Linking to UFO Phil wouldn't be too appropriate if the [[UFO#See also]] section only had two or even five links, since he's fairly minor, but since it has fifty (!), he fits fine. And no, having 50 See also links is ''not'' the best idea, when you get to that level, that's what [[Wikipedia:Categorization|Categories]] are for... but there are two million articles on the Wikipedia, and this is not nearly as bad as some; we have to choose our battles. If you want to go in and improve it, good luck, but don't expect it to be calm. -- +++$+++ * [[UFO]] being an edit war in progress... well, yeah, what did you expect? :-)  I can similarly, even without looking, tell you that [[Iraq War]], [[George W. Bush]], [[Abortion]], and [[Scientology]] aren't going to be the most calm and peaceful articles either. It's the nature of the subject. I looked at it, and it wasn't actually as bad as it could have been, it has lots of information and references, and nice pictures, a few {{tl|fact}} tags are not so bad. Linking to UFO Phil wouldn't be too appropriate if the [[UFO#See also]] section only had two or even five links, since he's fairly minor, but since it has fifty (!), he fits fine. And no, having 50 See also links is ''not'' the best idea, when you get to that level, that's what [[Wikipedia:Categorization|Categories]] are for... but there are two million articles on the Wikipedia, and this is not nearly as bad as some; we have to choose our battles. If you want to go in and improve it, good luck, but don't expect it to be calm. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

182 +++$+++ Erebus555 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 182 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-30 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.185836760E09 +++$+++ You may or may not be aware that your images of the canals are being used [http:\/\/www.atbirmingham.com\/canals\/ here] without any credit to you being the photographer. I thought I should raise it to your attention. -  +++$+++ You may or may not be aware that your images of the canals are being used [http://www.atbirmingham.com/canals/ here] without any credit to you being the photographer. I thought I should raise it to your attention. - [[User:Erebus555|Erebus555]] 16:06, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
183 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 182 +++$+++ 182 +++$+++ 2007-07-30 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.185856440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. Well spotted. I must check the licencing I put on them.  +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know. Well spotted. I must check the licencing I put on them. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 21:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
184 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 182 +++$+++ 183 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 08:09:00 +++$+++ 1.185894540E09 +++$+++ Yes. Nine GFDL images used without credit.  I've emailed the webmaster. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Yes. Nine GFDL images used without credit.  I've emailed the webmaster. Thanks. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 08:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
185 +++$+++ Erebus555 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 182 +++$+++ 184 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.185907620E09 +++$+++ No problem. I thought I had seen those pictures before somewhere :) -  +++$+++ :::No problem. I thought I had seen those pictures before somewhere :) - [[User:Erebus555|Erebus555]] 11:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

480628 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-16 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.297888800E09 +++$+++ Hi, JaGa. In addition to my requests to move \"Avatar\" and \"The Day the Earth Stood Still\" based on educational value, I also made a request to move \"The Amazing Spider-Man\" (see discussion [[Talk:The Amazing Spider-Man (comic book)#Requested move 2|here]]). Basically, I think the comic book series, the current primary topic, is not a primary topic because it does not have the educational value that the other moves' topics have. It is certainly an originating term for other topics, including the 2012 film, but my impression is that origination is not the criteria. My brief research of the comic book series shows that it is well-known but not necessarily educationally valuable. In addition, I also cited the other Spider-Man films' popularity to strongly indicate that the 2012 film will be a contender for reader traffic. I ask about this in part because we have some topical pairings out there where we have the source material as the primary topic and the film adaptation as the secondary topic. For example, we have [[Apt Pupil]] and [[Apt Pupil (film)]]. In contrast, we have [[Road to Perdition]] (film adaptation) and [[Road to Perdition (comics)]] (source material). I was not sure how widely \"educational value\" could apply, and any feedback would be greatly appreciated.  +++$+++ Hi, JaGa. In addition to my requests to move "Avatar" and "The Day the Earth Stood Still" based on educational value, I also made a request to move "The Amazing Spider-Man" (see discussion [[Talk:The Amazing Spider-Man (comic book)#Requested move 2|here]]). Basically, I think the comic book series, the current primary topic, is not a primary topic because it does not have the educational value that the other moves' topics have. It is certainly an originating term for other topics, including the 2012 film, but my impression is that origination is not the criteria. My brief research of the comic book series shows that it is well-known but not necessarily educationally valuable. In addition, I also cited the other Spider-Man films' popularity to strongly indicate that the 2012 film will be a contender for reader traffic. I ask about this in part because we have some topical pairings out there where we have the source material as the primary topic and the film adaptation as the secondary topic. For example, we have [[Apt Pupil]] and [[Apt Pupil (film)]]. In contrast, we have [[Road to Perdition]] (film adaptation) and [[Road to Perdition (comics)]] (source material). I was not sure how widely "educational value" could apply, and any feedback would be greatly appreciated. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 12:40, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
480629 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480628 +++$+++ 480628 +++$+++ 2011-02-16 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.297909860E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the wishy-washy answer. The changes to PRIMARYTOPIC have made things murkier, but that was the intention, to encourage discussion. I would probably support the dab in this case. -- +++$+++ :Sorry for the wishy-washy answer. The changes to PRIMARYTOPIC have made things murkier, but that was the intention, to encourage discussion. I would probably support the dab in this case. --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 18:31, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
480630 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480628 +++$+++ 480629 +++$+++ 2011-02-16 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.297924380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the response! Sounds like you intended for \"educational value\" to apply to topics of a classical nature. I was not sure how well it applied to ''The Day the Earth Stood Still'' since it is a very reputable film that was iconic of the times. Even JHunterJ who disagrees with the Avatar move supports the 1951 film's move. Would it be too much for WikiProject Film to provide some idea of how educational value could apply to the scope of film? Or just see what kind of ideas come naturally to us in these kinds of discussions?  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the response! Sounds like you intended for "educational value" to apply to topics of a classical nature. I was not sure how well it applied to ''The Day the Earth Stood Still'' since it is a very reputable film that was iconic of the times. Even JHunterJ who disagrees with the Avatar move supports the 1951 film's move. Would it be too much for WikiProject Film to provide some idea of how educational value could apply to the scope of film? Or just see what kind of ideas come naturally to us in these kinds of discussions? [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 22:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
480631 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480628 +++$+++ 480630 +++$+++ 2011-02-17 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.297943820E09 +++$+++ It's exciting stuff, really. If the \"educational value\" concept survives, we'll be a step closer to being that respected encyclopedia of everything instead of a slave to \"what's hot this month\" in Google search results.  -- +++$+++ :::It's exciting stuff, really. If the "educational value" concept survives, we'll be a step closer to being that respected encyclopedia of everything instead of a slave to "what's hot this month" in Google search results.  --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 03:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

186 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-10 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.186770960E09 +++$+++ Your TVC map looks good - you might like to add the Green Lane footbridge ([http:\/\/maps.google.co.uk\/?ie=UTF8&ll=52.542681,-1.947112&spn=0.003523,0.010042&t=h&z=17&om=1 map]), between the Hamstead Wharf and A4041. It's well worth a visit, to view the steep-sided and heavily wooded valley, below; and quite impressive viewed from below. Access from the former to latter is most easily done via the unadvertised path down from the A4041, north-west side (if driving, park in a side street).  +++$+++ Your TVC map looks good - you might like to add the Green Lane footbridge ([http://maps.google.co.uk/?ie=UTF8&ll=52.542681,-1.947112&spn=0.003523,0.010042&t=h&z=17&om=1 map]), between the Hamstead Wharf and A4041. It's well worth a visit, to view the steep-sided and heavily wooded valley, below; and quite impressive viewed from below. Access from the former to latter is most easily done via the unadvertised path down from the A4041, north-west side (if driving, park in a side street). [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] | [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy Mabbett]] 11:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
187 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 186 +++$+++ 186 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.186771920E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Done. OS detail map from 1901 shows a canal basin to east of footbridge and wharf to the west and at the footbridge near the pier. The ''Pier'' is marked on the map with no further explanation. It actually resembles the canal footings of a bridge pier (in size and style), but with no indication of any track to it, although it could have been, or intended to be, a branch off the tramway to Hamstead Colliery.  +++$+++ :Thanks. Done. OS detail map from 1901 shows a canal basin to east of footbridge and wharf to the west and at the footbridge near the pier. The ''Pier'' is marked on the map with no further explanation. It actually resembles the canal footings of a bridge pier (in size and style), but with no indication of any track to it, although it could have been, or intended to be, a branch off the tramway to Hamstead Colliery. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 11:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
188 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 186 +++$+++ 187 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.186771980E09 +++$+++ Interesting; is that map on-line? Also, don't forget [http:\/\/maps.google.co.uk\/?ie=UTF8&t=h&om=1&ll=52.532122,-1.902094&spn=0.003707,0.010042&z=17 Perry Reservoir].  +++$+++ ::Interesting; is that map on-line? Also, don't forget [http://maps.google.co.uk/?ie=UTF8&t=h&om=1&ll=52.532122,-1.902094&spn=0.003707,0.010042&z=17 Perry Reservoir]. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] | [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy Mabbett]] 11:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
189 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 186 +++$+++ 188 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.186796280E09 +++$+++ Is Perry Reservoir part of the canal network? - it is below the canal level.  +++$+++ :::Is Perry Reservoir part of the canal network? - it is below the canal level. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 18:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
190 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 186 +++$+++ 189 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.186796820E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Perry_Barr#_note-Nicholson2 Yup]\/  +++$+++ ::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_Barr#_note-Nicholson2 Yup]/ [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] | [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy Mabbett]] 18:47, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
191 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 186 +++$+++ 190 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.186803540E09 +++$+++ OS map of Hamstead Colliery and Wharf now on Commons here: [[:Image:Hamstead Colliery 50pc.jpg]].  +++$+++ :::::OS map of Hamstead Colliery and Wharf now on Commons here: [[:Image:Hamstead Colliery 50pc.jpg]]. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 20:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
192 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 186 +++$+++ 191 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.186804620E09 +++$+++ You're very kind, thank you. It's absolutely fascinating - I know the area well - to compare the map and the current aerial views on Google. Hardly anything remains, though you can make out the mouth of the basin. I wonder if the people who live there now, know what went on under their floors?  +++$+++ ::::::You're very kind, thank you. It's absolutely fascinating - I know the area well - to compare the map and the current aerial views on Google. Hardly anything remains, though you can make out the mouth of the basin. I wonder if the people who live there now, know what went on under their floors? [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] | [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy Mabbett]] 20:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
193 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 186 +++$+++ 186 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.186772220E09 +++$+++ Another thing - the M6 doesn't cross the canal near Rushall Junction; see [http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=52.5498,-1.9555&spn=0.01,0.01&q=52.5498,-1.9555 this map].  +++$+++ :Another thing - the M6 doesn't cross the canal near Rushall Junction; see [http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=52.5498,-1.9555&spn=0.01,0.01&q=52.5498,-1.9555 this map]. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] | [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy Mabbett]] 11:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
194 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 186 +++$+++ 193 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.186796280E09 +++$+++ Noted. :)  +++$+++ ::Noted. :) [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 18:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

524479 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524479 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-05 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.191637200E09 +++$+++ Hi, ''mus musculus non-nominatus'', I hate to ask but you seem to be one of the few editors\/admins I know who is non-judgmental when it comes to porn pages; could you take a look at the above if you have time and let me have your opinion? Myself and [[User:Nazz]] are the only two editors of [[Tove Jensen]] at present, and I'm only involved because this guy seems to have an [[WP:AX|axe to grind]] and the page is on my watch list. The specific issue at present is the birthdate and I won't say any more until you've had a look at it. Thanks --''' +++$+++ Hi, ''mus musculus non-nominatus'', I hate to ask but you seem to be one of the few editors/admins I know who is non-judgmental when it comes to porn pages; could you take a look at the above if you have time and let me have your opinion? Myself and [[User:Nazz]] are the only two editors of [[Tove Jensen]] at present, and I'm only involved because this guy seems to have an [[WP:AX|axe to grind]] and the page is on my watch list. The specific issue at present is the birthdate and I won't say any more until you've had a look at it. Thanks --'''[[User:Rodhullandemu|Rodhullandemu]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rodhullandemu|contribs]]) 19:20, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
524480 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524479 +++$+++ 524479 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.191640980E09 +++$+++ Oh my. I wish I could tell you better news, but the birthdate is the least of your worries. The article is somewhat controversial, about a probably living person, and basically unsourced. Porn stars are controversial by their nature, but due to her specialty, this one seems to be more controversial than some. There is a strong argument in [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]] that all unsourced derogatory or controversial information about living persons should be deleted outright; this whole article isn't obviously at that level, but it isn't that far from it. I looked a while on the web, and I couldn't find any [[Wikipedia:reliable sources]] writing about her, or even backing Alkivar's claim from [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Tove Jensen]], which seems to be why it wasn't deleted then. There are lots of image galleries, but that doesn't mean much; the ones who want to publish actual information about here refer ... to our article! I've looked at the PDFs referenced from the article talk page, and they aren't conclusive proof of anything, and even if they were, they would probably be primary sources. :-( The article isn't slanderous, but I strongly doubt it could stand up to another deletion challenge, which makes the question of age rather moot. -- +++$+++ : Oh my. I wish I could tell you better news, but the birthdate is the least of your worries. The article is somewhat controversial, about a probably living person, and basically unsourced. Porn stars are controversial by their nature, but due to her specialty, this one seems to be more controversial than some. There is a strong argument in [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]] that all unsourced derogatory or controversial information about living persons should be deleted outright; this whole article isn't obviously at that level, but it isn't that far from it. I looked a while on the web, and I couldn't find any [[Wikipedia:reliable sources]] writing about her, or even backing Alkivar's claim from [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tove Jensen]], which seems to be why it wasn't deleted then. There are lots of image galleries, but that doesn't mean much; the ones who want to publish actual information about here refer ... to our article! I've looked at the PDFs referenced from the article talk page, and they aren't conclusive proof of anything, and even if they were, they would probably be primary sources. :-( The article isn't slanderous, but I strongly doubt it could stand up to another deletion challenge, which makes the question of age rather moot. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 20:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
524481 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524479 +++$+++ 524480 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.191641760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking the time. I re-read the original AfD & take on board Alkivar's claim but then nothing the FBI say would surprise me, but that should be irrelevant in any case. The distinction I see here is that whereas most American actors have well-publicised BIO details, European ones generally do not and I suppose someone has tried to make bricks without straw here. I have no particular interest in seeing the article survive if it's that bad anyway, so I'll leave it to its own devices and let someone AfD it if they want. It's not as if the article links anywhere useful in any case. Thanks again. --''' +++$+++ :: Thanks for taking the time. I re-read the original AfD & take on board Alkivar's claim but then nothing the FBI say would surprise me, but that should be irrelevant in any case. The distinction I see here is that whereas most American actors have well-publicised BIO details, European ones generally do not and I suppose someone has tried to make bricks without straw here. I have no particular interest in seeing the article survive if it's that bad anyway, so I'll leave it to its own devices and let someone AfD it if they want. It's not as if the article links anywhere useful in any case. Thanks again. --'''[[User:Rodhullandemu|Rodhullandemu]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rodhullandemu|contribs]]) 20:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

524482 +++$+++ Jamesd1 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-06 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.191662100E09 +++$+++ I will not be coming back to the article unless word reaches me by email that the situation has changed.  It will likely be some time before I sign on to Wiki again and I will not be checking for response to this, my last post--there is a direct non-Wikipedia email link on my personal page.  If anyone should need to contact me, use that, because after I click \"Save\" on this message, I'm out of here and will not look back.    +++$+++ I will not be coming back to the article unless word reaches me by email that the situation has changed.  It will likely be some time before I sign on to Wiki again and I will not be checking for response to this, my last post--there is a direct non-Wikipedia email link on my personal page.  If anyone should need to contact me, use that, because after I click "Save" on this message, I'm out of here and will not look back.   [[User:Jamesd1|James]] 02:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
524483 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524482 +++$+++ 524482 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.191958980E09 +++$+++ Sorry it wasn't fun. Thank you for your contributions, I think the good ones will stay longer than you think. Nice quote there at the end, a very good idea. -- +++$+++ : Sorry it wasn't fun. Thank you for your contributions, I think the good ones will stay longer than you think. Nice quote there at the end, a very good idea. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 12:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

195 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 195 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-18 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.187463840E09 +++$+++ Great work! They look really  good, laid over Google maps using the coordinates link.  +++$+++ Great work! They look really  good, laid over Google maps using the coordinates link. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] | [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy Mabbett]] 12:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
196 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 195 +++$+++ 195 +++$+++ 2007-08-18 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.187470440E09 +++$+++ I was so relieved to finish the checking that I didn't realise I'd left off the OS coordinbates - to follow eventually. Thanks for the reference for the Smethwick coal chutes. Unfortunately they were demolished earlier this year, before I knew about them.   +++$+++ :I was so relieved to finish the checking that I didn't realise I'd left off the OS coordinbates - to follow eventually. Thanks for the reference for the Smethwick coal chutes. Unfortunately they were demolished earlier this year, before I knew about them.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 13:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

524484 +++$+++ Sparklecplenty +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-06 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.191673380E09 +++$+++ When James was the main editor you classified this article as a Class B. Please checkout what Parsifal, the new editor, placed over your Class B rating --that is after she reverted and revised the class B article. Thanks.  +++$+++ When James was the main editor you classified this article as a Class B. Please checkout what Parsifal, the new editor, placed over your Class B rating --that is after she reverted and revised the class B article. Thanks. [[User:Sparklecplenty|Sparklecplenty]] 05:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
524485 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524484 +++$+++ 524484 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.191958980E09 +++$+++ [[Talk:Alice Bailey]] still seems to be consistently B-Class, I don't see any change. I also took a quick glance at Parsifal's edits there, and couldn't see what you are referring to, though, of course, there were many, so I probably missed it. A [[wp:diff|diff]], perhaps? -- +++$+++ : [[Talk:Alice Bailey]] still seems to be consistently B-Class, I don't see any change. I also took a quick glance at Parsifal's edits there, and couldn't see what you are referring to, though, of course, there were many, so I probably missed it. A [[wp:diff|diff]], perhaps? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 12:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

197 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 197 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-30 08:40:00 +++$+++ 1.188488400E09 +++$+++ You say on your user page \"and default 2nd parameter as qualifying suffix\".  Could you explain - or point me to where I can find any documentation about this?  Thanks.   +++$+++ You say on your user page "and default 2nd parameter as qualifying suffix".  Could you explain - or point me to where I can find any documentation about this?  Thanks.  [[User:PamD|PamD]] 08:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
198 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 197 +++$+++ 197 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.188489840E09 +++$+++ Good luck.  +++$+++ :Good luck. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 09:04, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
199 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 197 +++$+++ 198 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.188490680E09 +++$+++ Documentation added to template Talk page.   +++$+++ ::Documentation added to template Talk page.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 09:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

524486 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-06 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.191695580E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... Jamesd1 staged a walkout. And he is blaming it on the Jews! As he wrote above: \"those  identified with the Jewish issues, will now control a subject...\" But if he had not been so determined to have control of the article's content in his own hands only, and if he had been willing to work with a spirit of compromise, then there would have been little to argue about. In any case he did not ''have'' to leave, but chose to leave; making a last minute big drama out of it in the process (which is itself contrary behavior to what Bailey taught her students.).  +++$+++ Hmmm... Jamesd1 staged a walkout. And he is blaming it on the Jews! As he wrote above: "those  identified with the Jewish issues, will now control a subject..." But if he had not been so determined to have control of the article's content in his own hands only, and if he had been willing to work with a spirit of compromise, then there would have been little to argue about. In any case he did not ''have'' to leave, but chose to leave; making a last minute big drama out of it in the process (which is itself contrary behavior to what Bailey taught her students.). [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 11:33, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
524487 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524486 +++$+++ 524486 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.191958980E09 +++$+++ Calm, calm, please. It's been a contentious situation, I can well believe it's not fun for some. -- +++$+++ : Calm, calm, please. It's been a contentious situation, I can well believe it's not fun for some. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 12:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

262343 +++$+++ GamerPro64 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-09 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.294639560E09 +++$+++ Dana, have you been looking at the Featured Article review page lately? I think that some of them missed the talk page step.  +++$+++ Dana, have you been looking at the Featured Article review page lately? I think that some of them missed the talk page step. [[User:GamerPro64|GamerPro64]] ([[User talk:GamerPro64|talk]]) 22:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
262344 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262343 +++$+++ 262343 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.294639800E09 +++$+++ Which ones specifically?  +++$+++ :Which ones specifically? [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
262345 +++$+++ GamerPro64 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262343 +++$+++ 262344 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.294639920E09 +++$+++ [[Exploding whale]]. I think that's about it.  +++$+++ ::[[Exploding whale]]. I think that's about it. [[User:GamerPro64|GamerPro64]] ([[User talk:GamerPro64|talk]]) 22:12, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
262346 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262343 +++$+++ 262345 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.294640400E09 +++$+++ From what I can see, [[Talk:Exploding whale]] has at least two sections stretching back to July 2009 questioning the FA status of this article. None of the comments got any response in the form of article improvement. Since pre-FAR notifications are aimed toward finding out if there are any editors willing to work on the article, I would say that the requirement has been fufilled by these previous posts, even if they are not by the same editor. The new requirements are not about adding increasing amounts of bureaucracy to the process, they are about trying to improve articles without the need for FAR. I hope this answers your question?  +++$+++ :::From what I can see, [[Talk:Exploding whale]] has at least two sections stretching back to July 2009 questioning the FA status of this article. None of the comments got any response in the form of article improvement. Since pre-FAR notifications are aimed toward finding out if there are any editors willing to work on the article, I would say that the requirement has been fufilled by these previous posts, even if they are not by the same editor. The new requirements are not about adding increasing amounts of bureaucracy to the process, they are about trying to improve articles without the need for FAR. I hope this answers your question? [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:20, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
262347 +++$+++ GamerPro64 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262343 +++$+++ 262346 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.294641000E09 +++$+++ So what you're saying is, because of [[Talk:Metroid_Prime#Problems_with_article|this]], I could start an FAR without making another notification on the talk page.  +++$+++ ::::So what you're saying is, because of [[Talk:Metroid_Prime#Problems_with_article|this]], I could start an FAR without making another notification on the talk page. [[User:GamerPro64|GamerPro64]] ([[User talk:GamerPro64|talk]]) 22:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
262348 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262343 +++$+++ 262347 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.294642500E09 +++$+++ As long as those issues have not been addressed, then yes, go ahead.  +++$+++ :::::As long as those issues have not been addressed, then yes, go ahead. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
262349 +++$+++ GamerPro64 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262343 +++$+++ 262348 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.294725360E09 +++$+++ O.k. There's a review that didn't do step one. [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Devil May Cry 2\/archive1]]  +++$+++ ::::::O.k. There's a review that didn't do step one. [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Devil May Cry 2/archive1]] [[User:GamerPro64|GamerPro64]] ([[User talk:GamerPro64|talk]]) 21:56, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
262350 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262343 +++$+++ 262349 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.294731900E09 +++$+++ Thank you for notifying me of this. I have taken the appropriate steps.  +++$+++ :::::::Thank you for notifying me of this. I have taken the appropriate steps. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 23:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

201 +++$+++ Derek Andrews +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.189758120E09 +++$+++ This is useful info. Are there any other gizmos like this that make it easy to incorporate links into an article? If so, where would one find them?  +++$+++ This is useful info. Are there any other gizmos like this that make it easy to incorporate links into an article? If so, where would one find them? [[User:Derek Andrews|Derek Andrews]] 01:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
202 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 201 +++$+++ 201 +++$+++ 2007-11-14 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.195084560E09 +++$+++ Some useful (ie, written by me) templates are in [[:Category:Heritage templates]].  +++$+++ :Some useful (ie, written by me) templates are in [[:Category:Heritage templates]]. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 15:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

203 +++$+++ Max Schwarz +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-02 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.188779820E09 +++$+++ I noticed you were uploading the Canal description icons directly to Wikipedia.  Wouldn't it make more sense to upload them to the Commons, as is done with the [[WP:TRAIL|route diagram]] [[commons:Category:Icons for railway descriptions|icons]]?  They are free after all, and other Wikipedias could use them.--<strong><tt> +++$+++ I noticed you were uploading the Canal description icons directly to Wikipedia.  Wouldn't it make more sense to upload them to the Commons, as is done with the [[WP:TRAIL|route diagram]] [[commons:Category:Icons for railway descriptions|icons]]?  They are free after all, and other Wikipedias could use them.--<strong><tt>[[User:Max Schwarz|<font color="maroon">Max</font>]]</tt></strong>  <small class="plainlinks">[[User Talk:Max Schwarz|Talk ]][{{SERVER}}{{localurl:User_talk:Max_Schwarz|action=edit&section=new}} (+)]</small> 17:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
204 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 203 +++$+++ 203 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.189441140E09 +++$+++ Yes. A much better location, although more with effort and complexity. Also less easy to keep track of comments or changes unless you log on to Commons regularly. Perhaps we should be encouraged to move them all - they are split between locations. However use of Commons requires a lot more effort and discipline, not to mention the somewhat unfamiliar and evolving upload dialogues and copyright licencing and categories.   +++$+++ :Yes. A much better location, although more with effort and complexity. Also less easy to keep track of comments or changes unless you log on to Commons regularly. Perhaps we should be encouraged to move them all - they are split between locations. However use of Commons requires a lot more effort and discipline, not to mention the somewhat unfamiliar and evolving upload dialogues and copyright licencing and categories.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 09:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

524322 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524322 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-12 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.189654920E09 +++$+++ But I have not figured out how to access the email addresses of users who purportedly have them. Where is the icon ???---   [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 20:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ But I have not figured out how to access the email addresses of users who purportedly have them. Where is the icon ???---   [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 20:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 20:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
524323 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524322 +++$+++ 524322 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.189655040E09 +++$+++ You can't access the email address, you can just send email through a web page form. Left hand side, \"toolbox\" box, \"E-mail this user\" link. If either of you don't have email set when you click on it, you won't even get a form to fill in. -- +++$+++ : You can't access the email address, you can just send email through a web page form. Left hand side, "toolbox" box, "E-mail this user" link. If either of you don't have email set when you click on it, you won't even get a form to fill in. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 20:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

206 +++$+++ Derek Andrews +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.189757460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up about the coordinates. Certainly some advantages to using them. I noticed you had added them to [[Lydney Canal]], but they looked kind of technical and boring so I never investigated further. I wonder how many other users miss the point too? And what if you wanted to highlight multiple features on one article, say Claverton, Crofton and Avoncliffe on the K&A? Other reasons for maintaining direct links: fewer clicks; reader knows there will be a good res photo (many areas don't have good resolution). best regards +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up about the coordinates. Certainly some advantages to using them. I noticed you had added them to [[Lydney Canal]], but they looked kind of technical and boring so I never investigated further. I wonder how many other users miss the point too? And what if you wanted to highlight multiple features on one article, say Claverton, Crofton and Avoncliffe on the K&A? Other reasons for maintaining direct links: fewer clicks; reader knows there will be a good res photo (many areas don't have good resolution). best regards[[User:Derek Andrews|Derek Andrews]] 01:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
207 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 206 +++$+++ 206 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.189783440E09 +++$+++ I am very impressed by your single click to a scaled satellite view. This works well with a moderately-sized feature. Best wishes   +++$+++ :I am very impressed by your single click to a scaled satellite view. This works well with a moderately-sized feature. Best wishes  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 08:24, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

262351 +++$+++ Jimfbleak +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-13 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.294961820E09 +++$+++ It's listed [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds#King_Vulture_redux|here]], I'll see what I can do, but I'm very busy in RL at present <font face=\"chiller\"><font color=\"red\"><b> +++$+++ It's listed [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds#King_Vulture_redux|here]], I'll see what I can do, but I'm very busy in RL at present <font face="chiller"><font color="red"><b>[[User:Jimfbleak|Jimfbleak]] - </b></font></font><font face="arial"><font color="green">[[User talk:Jimfbleak| talk to me?]]</font></font> 15:37, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
262352 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262351 +++$+++ 262351 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.294974060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your edits and comment at the FAR. It's been posted several times (once when it was nominated, once by Cas and once by me) on the WP Birds page, but those postings haven't garnered ''any'' response. I was hoping that a personal appeal would get more of one, apparently that was a successful hope!  +++$+++ :Thanks for your edits and comment at the FAR. It's been posted several times (once when it was nominated, once by Cas and once by me) on the WP Birds page, but those postings haven't garnered ''any'' response. I was hoping that a personal appeal would get more of one, apparently that was a successful hope! [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 19:01, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

208 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 208 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-26 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.190856480E09 +++$+++ It looks ominously as if IoE have restructured their database... this could be where having the link as a template will prove to be really useful, if you can fix it!    +++$+++ It looks ominously as if IoE have restructured their database... this could be where having the link as a template will prove to be really useful, if you can fix it!   [[User:PamD|PamD]] 18:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
209 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 208 +++$+++ 208 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.190860740E09 +++$+++ It seems to work for me. Perhaps the database was down for a while. It certainly has had a visual make-over. Still got problems?   +++$+++ :It seems to work for me. Perhaps the database was down for a while. It certainly has had a visual make-over. Still got problems?  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 19:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
210 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 208 +++$+++ 209 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.190861160E09 +++$+++ Seems OK now, yes.  Good!  Definitely something odd happening earlier though. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Seems OK now, yes.  Good!  Definitely something odd happening earlier though. Thanks. [[User:PamD|PamD]] 19:46, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
211 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 208 +++$+++ 210 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.190861760E09 +++$+++ A kind editor has updated the master template, IoEentry, with the new parameters for the website. We are all  grateful.  +++$+++ :::A kind editor has updated the master template, IoEentry, with the new parameters for the website. We are all  grateful. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 19:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

480632 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-18 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.298033700E09 +++$+++ Hi SilkTork, now that [[Reading to Plymouth Line]] is a disambig, don't forget to [[WP:FIXDABLINKS]] - or at least get some of those who have been discussing the split for so long to help out. [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~jason\/dab_fix_list.php?title=Reading_to_Plymouth_Line This tool] will help. It's mostly template fixes so it shouldn't be too hard for someone who's familiar with it. Cheers, -- +++$+++ Hi SilkTork, now that [[Reading to Plymouth Line]] is a disambig, don't forget to [[WP:FIXDABLINKS]] - or at least get some of those who have been discussing the split for so long to help out. [http://toolserver.org/~jason/dab_fix_list.php?title=Reading_to_Plymouth_Line This tool] will help. It's mostly template fixes so it shouldn't be too hard for someone who's familiar with it. Cheers, --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 04:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
480633 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480632 +++$+++ 480632 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.298050980E09 +++$+++ Hi JaGa. I am always puzzled as to why you ask me to do work which you are as capable of doing yourself as I am. We have spoken about this before. Wikipedia is a volunteer charity project, and people do their best in the time they have available to them, and people will tend to work initially in areas that interest them, and then help out on tedious tasks if they have the time or inclination - but nobody is compelled to do anything (well, other than to take care they are not doing harm). That particular splitting you are talking about was a long and complex one that nobody had done for more than two years because of the amount of work involved. Sending people a nag message at the end of it instead of pitching in and helping out yourself is not conducive to the spirit of support, co-operation and collaboration that embodies the spirit of Wikipedia that I respect and enjoy so much. If you spot a spelling mistake - fix it yourself instead of sending someone a message. If you see that an article needs sourcing, it's acceptable to put a general message on the article asking people who are interested in that sort of work to alert them, but it's even better to do the work yourself; it's not really done to pick on the last person who edited the article to ask them to do all the work. You may not have noticed but I did send a message to those people involved in that article letting them know what had happened, and that clean up work might now be needed as I am not an expert on the topic. I know you are well intentioned, but I have already indicated to you that I am uncomfortable with these messages. I would respect you much more if you pitched in and did the work yourself rather than send people these messages. I would love to know that you were helping out by tidying up after me. I would think that was great. Really I would. How about creating a template to be placed on newly created disamb pages that says that work on sorting them out needs to be done. And the template could put such articles into a category to enable editors to work through all the articles that need attention. I think a general message would be more in the spirit of Wikipedia than putting the weight all on one person. If we make a task too onerous for one person, then that task will be ignored.  <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :Hi JaGa. I am always puzzled as to why you ask me to do work which you are as capable of doing yourself as I am. We have spoken about this before. Wikipedia is a volunteer charity project, and people do their best in the time they have available to them, and people will tend to work initially in areas that interest them, and then help out on tedious tasks if they have the time or inclination - but nobody is compelled to do anything (well, other than to take care they are not doing harm). That particular splitting you are talking about was a long and complex one that nobody had done for more than two years because of the amount of work involved. Sending people a nag message at the end of it instead of pitching in and helping out yourself is not conducive to the spirit of support, co-operation and collaboration that embodies the spirit of Wikipedia that I respect and enjoy so much. If you spot a spelling mistake - fix it yourself instead of sending someone a message. If you see that an article needs sourcing, it's acceptable to put a general message on the article asking people who are interested in that sort of work to alert them, but it's even better to do the work yourself; it's not really done to pick on the last person who edited the article to ask them to do all the work. You may not have noticed but I did send a message to those people involved in that article letting them know what had happened, and that clean up work might now be needed as I am not an expert on the topic. I know you are well intentioned, but I have already indicated to you that I am uncomfortable with these messages. I would respect you much more if you pitched in and did the work yourself rather than send people these messages. I would love to know that you were helping out by tidying up after me. I would think that was great. Really I would. How about creating a template to be placed on newly created disamb pages that says that work on sorting them out needs to be done. And the template could put such articles into a category to enable editors to work through all the articles that need attention. I think a general message would be more in the spirit of Wikipedia than putting the weight all on one person. If we make a task too onerous for one person, then that task will be ignored.  <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 09:43, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
480634 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480632 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.298051820E09 +++$+++ SilkTork, every month I fix several thousand disambiguation links left behind by editors like yourself, so don't worry about whether I \"pitch in\" or not. And in the past, I ''have'' tidied up after you (remember my request for help on [[Mississippi Central Railroad]] that you dismissed with \"it would be more appropriate to leave that for someone who does know\"? Well, I was the one who figured it out.) The concept is simple; you make the mess, you clean it up. We work hard at the [[WP:DPL]] and people like you are no help - literally. And you'll notice, in the note I left on your page, I asked you to at least ask others to help out. Could you do that? Because I'm not sure how to clean this up - or even if the split was a good idea. -- +++$+++ :::SilkTork, every month I fix several thousand disambiguation links left behind by editors like yourself, so don't worry about whether I "pitch in" or not. And in the past, I ''have'' tidied up after you (remember my request for help on [[Mississippi Central Railroad]] that you dismissed with "it would be more appropriate to leave that for someone who does know"? Well, I was the one who figured it out.) The concept is simple; you make the mess, you clean it up. We work hard at the [[WP:DPL]] and people like you are no help - literally. And you'll notice, in the note I left on your page, I asked you to at least ask others to help out. Could you do that? Because I'm not sure how to clean this up - or even if the split was a good idea. --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 09:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

262354 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-14 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.295004960E09 +++$+++ Hi Dana, I have a rough start to the Legacy section on a user page and I hope to have it finished in a week.  +++$+++ Hi Dana, I have a rough start to the Legacy section on a user page and I hope to have it finished in a week. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 03:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
262355 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262354 +++$+++ 262354 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.295373300E09 +++$+++ You can view my progress [[User:WesleyDodds\/tempwork#Legacy|here]].  +++$+++ :You can view my progress [[User:WesleyDodds/tempwork#Legacy|here]]. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 09:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
262356 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262354 +++$+++ 262355 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.295385480E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for keeping me updated!  +++$+++ ::OK, thanks for keeping me updated! [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 13:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

524499 +++$+++ Betacommand +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-11 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.192166340E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User talk:Betacommand|β<sup><sub>command</sub></sup>]] 22:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
524500 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524499 +++$+++ 524499 +++$+++ 2007-10-12 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.192221600E09 +++$+++ There is such a thing; let's see.... -- +++$+++ : There is such a thing; let's see.... --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

212 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 212 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-30 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.191188820E09 +++$+++ I presumed that I could legitimately replace one editor's GFDL straight line with an identically-looking PD upload of my own on Wikipedia. I have, in fact, omitted this stage and uploaded the replacement directly to Commons. This has alerted a bot. Is this explanatuion sufficient to justify deletion from Wikipedia? Should I legitimise my efforts by uploading the PD version to Wikipedia first, so that a simple migration can be seen to have occurred, or is my logic flawed in the obviation of attribution?  +++$+++ I presumed that I could legitimately replace one editor's GFDL straight line with an identically-looking PD upload of my own on Wikipedia. I have, in fact, omitted this stage and uploaded the replacement directly to Commons. This has alerted a bot. Is this explanatuion sufficient to justify deletion from Wikipedia? Should I legitimise my efforts by uploading the PD version to Wikipedia first, so that a simple migration can be seen to have occurred, or is my logic flawed in the obviation of attribution? [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 14:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
213 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 212 +++$+++ 212 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.192032900E09 +++$+++ I've just come across Commons Helper. There is a tick box (ticked by default, I think) which supposedly adds some guessed categories. It didn't seem to do anything when I tried it, but perhaps it needs unticking for this particular task. I've already done some deletions of migrated icons. Best wishes.   +++$+++ :I've just come across Commons Helper. There is a tick box (ticked by default, I think) which supposedly adds some guessed categories. It didn't seem to do anything when I tried it, but perhaps it needs unticking for this particular task. I've already done some deletions of migrated icons. Best wishes.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 09:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
214 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 212 +++$+++ 212 +++$+++ 2007-10-29 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.193717940E09 +++$+++ Are you asking to use the picture on a personal or commercial website?  +++$+++ :Are you asking to use the picture on a personal or commercial website? [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]&nbsp;to&nbsp;me</sup></span> 21:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

215 +++$+++ Parrot of Doom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-27 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.214613900E09 +++$+++ I thought you might be interested in this which I just created.  I know little of these things but thought it deserved not to be redirected to Aberdeenshire :)  +++$+++ I thought you might be interested in this which I just created.  I know little of these things but thought it deserved not to be redirected to Aberdeenshire :) [[User:Parrot of Doom|Parrot of Doom]] ([[User talk:Parrot of Doom|talk]]) 17:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
216 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 215 +++$+++ 215 +++$+++ 2008-06-27 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.214617800E09 +++$+++ Yes. Thanks. Fascinating to see it from Google Satellite now you have pointed it out, and so close to civilisation. This is not particularly my subject either, but it's all interesting.  +++$+++ :Yes. Thanks. Fascinating to see it from Google Satellite now you have pointed it out, and so close to civilisation. This is not particularly my subject either, but it's all interesting. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 18:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

217 +++$+++ Slomox +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-27 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.222576380E09 +++$+++ Hello Oosoom, you are the creator of [[:Image:Urban_fox_and_rabbit.jpg]]. The fox is stuffed, isn't it? If he is, it should be noted in the image description that the image is staged. Thank you -- +++$+++ Hello Oosoom, you are the creator of [[:Image:Urban_fox_and_rabbit.jpg]]. The fox is stuffed, isn't it? If he is, it should be noted in the image description that the image is staged. Thank you --[[User:Slomox|::Slomox::]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Slomox|&gt;&lt;]] 21:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
218 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 217 +++$+++ 217 +++$+++ 2008-09-28 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.222622040E09 +++$+++ The fox, and events, are real and unstaged. For the full sequence see [[:Commons:Category:Files by User:Oosoom from en.wikipedia\/Fox and rabbit]].   +++$+++ :The fox, and events, are real and unstaged. For the full sequence see [[:Commons:Category:Files by User:Oosoom from en.wikipedia/Fox and rabbit]].  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 10:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
219 +++$+++ Slomox +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 217 +++$+++ 218 +++$+++ 2008-09-28 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.222649460E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'm sorry for suspecting you. It just seemed odd to me. The eyes of the fox look empty (the fox looks much more ''alive'' in [[:Image:Urban fox 381.jpg]] ;-) ) and I wondered why he would pull the chain. And the rabbit looks so unimpressed. Thank you for clarification. -- +++$+++ ::Okay, I'm sorry for suspecting you. It just seemed odd to me. The eyes of the fox look empty (the fox looks much more ''alive'' in [[:Image:Urban fox 381.jpg]] ;-) ) and I wondered why he would pull the chain. And the rabbit looks so unimpressed. Thank you for clarification. --[[User:Slomox|::Slomox::]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Slomox|&gt;&lt;]] 17:51, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
220 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 217 +++$+++ 219 +++$+++ 2008-09-28 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.222656840E09 +++$+++ No problem. I think the fox is demonstrating the trait that that foxes are able to defeat many cages, probably by random tugs and pokes. The rabbit is the most stupid of rabbits and seemed completely unfazed.   +++$+++ :::No problem. I think the fox is demonstrating the trait that that foxes are able to defeat many cages, probably by random tugs and pokes. The rabbit is the most stupid of rabbits and seemed completely unfazed.  [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 19:54, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
221 +++$+++ Dragon695 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 217 +++$+++ 220 +++$+++ 2008-12-05 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.228475160E09 +++$+++ I assume you shooed the fox away before it could make a meal of your rabbit? -- +++$+++ ::::I assume you shooed the fox away before it could make a meal of your rabbit? --[[User:Dragon695|Dragon695]] ([[User talk:Dragon695|talk]]) 03:06, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

262363 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262363 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-15 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.295084580E09 +++$+++ \"Foot of snow\"? Dana, I know you're American, so where do you live? There's only so many places in the US that get feet of snow at a time, and [[Marquette, Michigan|I'm in one of them]]. :-) (if you'd rather not answer, no worries)  +++$+++ "Foot of snow"? Dana, I know you're American, so where do you live? There's only so many places in the US that get feet of snow at a time, and [[Marquette, Michigan|I'm in one of them]]. :-) (if you'd rather not answer, no worries) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 01:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
262364 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262363 +++$+++ 262363 +++$+++ 2011-01-15 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.295087820E09 +++$+++ Sent you an e-mail.  +++$+++ :Sent you an e-mail. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 02:37, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

222 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-19 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.227165360E09 +++$+++ Splendid work on [[Martineau Family (Birmingham)]]! Do you have a copy of that reference, or use the library's?  +++$+++ Splendid work on [[Martineau Family (Birmingham)]]! Do you have a copy of that reference, or use the library's? [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] (User:Pigsonthewing); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Andy's talk]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]] 23:16, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
223 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 222 +++$+++ 222 +++$+++ 2008-11-20 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.227204300E09 +++$+++ Hi Andy. The Manning reference was a reference book on the 6th floor of Birmingham Library. It gives a sentence or two on a small selection of interees of note, including four Martineau'x. The Harriet Autobiography I found as an online book on Google Books following an ordinary search on Google. Try searching: \"harriet martineau\" \"settled in 1688\". I don't know how many pages you are allowed to read free of charge. The relevent text appears to have been ripped to [http:\/\/media.pfeiffer.edu\/lridener\/DSS\/Martineau\/MARTINP3.HTML here].  +++$+++ :Hi Andy. The Manning reference was a reference book on the 6th floor of Birmingham Library. It gives a sentence or two on a small selection of interees of note, including four Martineau'x. The Harriet Autobiography I found as an online book on Google Books following an ordinary search on Google. Try searching: "harriet martineau" "settled in 1688". I don't know how many pages you are allowed to read free of charge. The relevent text appears to have been ripped to [http://media.pfeiffer.edu/lridener/DSS/Martineau/MARTINP3.HTML here]. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 10:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

224 +++$+++ Mark Wheaver +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-01 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.230849180E09 +++$+++ The problem with my changes to St Paul's Square and your revert is that there is now an entry in the category for both the church (which is the Grade I listed building but doesn't have an article), and for the Square (which isn't but does).  Perhaps you'd like to join the clanger lynching at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject West Midlands#Listed building category listings]] ;-)  Happy New Year  +++$+++ The problem with my changes to St Paul's Square and your revert is that there is now an entry in the category for both the church (which is the Grade I listed building but doesn't have an article), and for the Square (which isn't but does).  Perhaps you'd like to join the clanger lynching at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject West Midlands#Listed building category listings]] ;-)  Happy New Year [[User:Mark Wheaver|Major-General Clanger]] ([[User talk:Mark Wheaver|talk]]) 14:33, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
225 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 224 +++$+++ 224 +++$+++ 2009-01-01 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.230856080E09 +++$+++ Perhaps someday somebody (or even I) will split {{Low|St Paul's Square, Birmingham}} in to separate articles for the square and the church. Until then, my rationale was that the square contains both Grade II (the original residences) and Grade I buildings (the church). :)  +++$+++ :Perhaps someday somebody (or even I) will split {{Low|St Paul's Square, Birmingham}} in to separate articles for the square and the church. Until then, my rationale was that the square contains both Grade II (the original residences) and Grade I buildings (the church). :) [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 16:28, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
226 +++$+++ Mark Wheaver +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 224 +++$+++ 225 +++$+++ 2009-01-01 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.230857460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply.  In my view, the Square is not a Grade I listed building and its inclusion negatively impacts the category I'm trying to improve.  Does it improve your page?  The 2nd set of examples in [[Wikipedia:Categorizing redirects]] are pertinent.  Cheers  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the reply.  In my view, the Square is not a Grade I listed building and its inclusion negatively impacts the category I'm trying to improve.  Does it improve your page?  The 2nd set of examples in [[Wikipedia:Categorizing redirects]] are pertinent.  Cheers [[User:Mark Wheaver|Major-General Clanger]] ([[User talk:Mark Wheaver|talk]]) 16:51, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

524514 +++$+++ Catherineyronwode +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524514 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-17 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.192649460E09 +++$+++ Thanks, cat yronwode  +++$+++ Thanks, cat yronwode [[User:Catherineyronwode|Catherineyronwode]] 12:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
524515 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524514 +++$+++ 524514 +++$+++ 2007-10-17 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.192663740E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
524516 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524514 +++$+++ 524515 +++$+++ 2007-10-17 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.192664040E09 +++$+++ I'm going to put the last version in [[User:Catherineyronwode\/Carroll Runyon]] for you. You can try to improve it there to make a better argument for undeletion. Write me when you've made a good stab at it, and we'll take it first to Yomangani, then, if necessary, to deletion review. -- +++$+++ :: I'm going to put the last version in [[User:Catherineyronwode/Carroll Runyon]] for you. You can try to improve it there to make a better argument for undeletion. Write me when you've made a good stab at it, and we'll take it first to Yomangani, then, if necessary, to deletion review. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

227 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 227 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-17 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.232261520E09 +++$+++ I cropped your pic to make [[:File:The Bear, Sparkhill crop.jpg]] and credited you as the author. Regards,  +++$+++ I cropped your pic to make [[:File:The Bear, Sparkhill crop.jpg]] and credited you as the author. Regards, [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] (User:Pigsonthewing); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Andy's talk]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]] 22:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
228 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 227 +++$+++ 227 +++$+++ 2009-01-18 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.232320380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. Now that I know how to correct for pespective distortion I might revisit some of these pub signs in the better weather and get some closer photos from below.  +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know. Now that I know how to correct for pespective distortion I might revisit some of these pub signs in the better weather and get some closer photos from below. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 15:13, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

584842 +++$+++ Barneca +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584842 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-09 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.202629140E09 +++$+++ Rats, e\/c'd on closing Dendodge.  I just can't seem to type fast enough. I suppose I need to limber up my digits if I plan on ever blocking someone at AIV before someone else does; can't keep up with this fast, younger crowd. -- +++$+++ Rats, e/c'd on closing Dendodge.  I just can't seem to type fast enough. I suppose I need to limber up my digits if I plan on ever blocking someone at AIV before someone else does; can't keep up with this fast, younger crowd. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca|talk]]) 23:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
584843 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584842 +++$+++ 584842 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.202629380E09 +++$+++ Heh, sorry about that. :) I've sometimes edit-conflicted with someone (normally EVula) when trying to close an RfA as well.  +++$+++ :Heh, sorry about that. :) I've sometimes edit-conflicted with someone (normally EVula) when trying to close an RfA as well. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 23:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

229 +++$+++ Lightmouse +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 229 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-06 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.233950580E09 +++$+++ It would be interesting to ask the people at [[Template talk:Convert]] if they can create a version for bell weights.  +++$+++ It would be interesting to ask the people at [[Template talk:Convert]] if they can create a version for bell weights. [[User:Lightmouse|Lightmouse]] ([[User talk:Lightmouse|talk]]) 12:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
230 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 229 +++$+++ 229 +++$+++ 2009-02-06 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.233952380E09 +++$+++ I've started [[:Template:CwtQtrLb to kg]] and added to the {{Low|St. Philip's Cathedral, Birmingham}} article to see how it looks. It calls the Convert template.  +++$+++ :I've started [[:Template:CwtQtrLb to kg]] and added to the {{Low|St. Philip's Cathedral, Birmingham}} article to see how it looks. It calls the Convert template. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 12:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

231 +++$+++ Lightmouse +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 231 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-06 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.233952920E09 +++$+++ The manual of style says that values in parentheses should be in symbolic form e.g. '(x kg)' rather than '(x kilograms)'. I hope that helps.  +++$+++ The manual of style says that values in parentheses should be in symbolic form e.g. '(x kg)' rather than '(x kilograms)'. I hope that helps. [[User:Lightmouse|Lightmouse]] ([[User talk:Lightmouse|talk]]) 12:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
232 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 231 +++$+++ 231 +++$+++ 2009-02-06 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.233963000E09 +++$+++ Done - changed to abbr=on.  +++$+++ :Done - changed to abbr=on. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 15:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

524520 +++$+++  +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524520 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Now that I understand a little more about how the Wikipedia system works, I am appreciative of your strong adherence to Wikipedia rules. Those that substantial knowledge of the writing of Alice Bailey have left. The Alice Bailey article is currently being shaped by those with a \"personal view\". The editors are biased, have little or no knowledge of the subject, and are not following Wikipedia rules of finding the the best verifiable sources, but are selecting sources that support what they want to say. And will insult and delete the work of anyone who tries to give a more balanced and scholarly picture. My personal talk page is still active if you want to reply there. thank you, Sparklecplenty 22:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ Now that I understand a little more about how the Wikipedia system works, I am appreciative of your strong adherence to Wikipedia rules. Those that substantial knowledge of the writing of Alice Bailey have left. The Alice Bailey article is currently being shaped by those with a "personal view". The editors are biased, have little or no knowledge of the subject, and are not following Wikipedia rules of finding the the best verifiable sources, but are selecting sources that support what they want to say. And will insult and delete the work of anyone who tries to give a more balanced and scholarly picture. My personal talk page is still active if you want to reply there. thank you, Sparklecplenty 22:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
524521 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524520 +++$+++ 524520 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.192738980E09 +++$+++ You have to realize that though I have a fair bit of experience on Wikipedia in general, I also have little or no knowledge of the subject specifically. Since the last time I looked at the article, the main changes I could see were that the Criticism or Controversy section has been dispersed to different sections of the article. I don't know if that is good or bad, it's certainly arguable either way. If you can give a link or [[wp:diff|diff]] of sections with specific questions you want me to help discuss, I can try to do that. If you have been specifically insulted, you can also give a diff to that, and I can also see if I can help there. -- +++$+++ : You have to realize that though I have a fair bit of experience on Wikipedia in general, I also have little or no knowledge of the subject specifically. Since the last time I looked at the article, the main changes I could see were that the Criticism or Controversy section has been dispersed to different sections of the article. I don't know if that is good or bad, it's certainly arguable either way. If you can give a link or [[wp:diff|diff]] of sections with specific questions you want me to help discuss, I can try to do that. If you have been specifically insulted, you can also give a diff to that, and I can also see if I can help there. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

233 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-20 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.235192640E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ Regards, [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] (User:Pigsonthewing); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Andy's talk]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]] 21:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
234 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 233 +++$+++ 233 +++$+++ 2009-02-23 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.235411700E09 +++$+++ Thanks Andy. Looks like it's in the Autumn: [http:\/\/www.victorian-society-bham.org.uk\/october2008.pdf Newsletter p7 pink box]  +++$+++ :Thanks Andy. Looks like it's in the Autumn: [http://www.victorian-society-bham.org.uk/october2008.pdf Newsletter p7 pink box] [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 09:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
235 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 233 +++$+++ 233 +++$+++ 2009-03-04 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.236234240E09 +++$+++ It is already in [[:Category:Heraldry by country]] which is itself in [[:Category:Heraldry]]. The country category seems to be to be the best place and an article shouldn't usually also be in a parent (and less specific) category.  Best wishes.  +++$+++ :It is already in [[:Category:Heraldry by country]] which is itself in [[:Category:Heraldry]]. The country category seems to be to be the best place and an article shouldn't usually also be in a parent (and less specific) category.  Best wishes. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 22:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

524522 +++$+++ Sparklecplenty +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524522 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-18 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.192697340E09 +++$+++ Dear AnonEmouse, please read the section with the title above, on the Alice Bailey talk page.  You may understand, that anyone who wishes to balance this article is made into a 'strawman\", the above section is one example. It was entered on October 15th. Thanks.  +++$+++ Dear AnonEmouse, please read the section with the title above, on the Alice Bailey talk page.  You may understand, that anyone who wishes to balance this article is made into a 'strawman", the above section is one example. It was entered on October 15th. Thanks. [[User:Sparklecplenty|Sparklecplenty]] 01:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
524523 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524522 +++$+++ 524522 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.192738560E09 +++$+++ Anyway, so, Catherine looked what James's name was on Citizendium, and noticed that he was, in fact, an associate of Phillip Lindsay, they wrote together. I recall that name from previous arguments, and am not quite sure why that is necessarily such a terrible accusation. The talk page section seems to end appropriately - James has moved on, let's wish him luck at Citizendium. -- +++$+++ : Anyway, so, Catherine looked what James's name was on Citizendium, and noticed that he was, in fact, an associate of Phillip Lindsay, they wrote together. I recall that name from previous arguments, and am not quite sure why that is necessarily such a terrible accusation. The talk page section seems to end appropriately - James has moved on, let's wish him luck at Citizendium. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
524524 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524522 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.192751460E09 +++$+++ You are one of three administrators who she has contacted to see if they will undo what she does not like about the article.  +++$+++ :::You are one of three administrators who she has contacted to see if they will undo what she does not like about the article. [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 16:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
524525 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524522 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.192752600E09 +++$+++ Well, I certainly won't if she can't tell me specifically what that is. I understand the whole thing is contentious, but the article and talk page has been so huge, I need specific bits to focus on. -- +++$+++ :::: Well, I certainly won't if she can't tell me specifically what that is. I understand the whole thing is contentious, but the article and talk page has been so huge, I need specific bits to focus on. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

236 +++$+++ Ronhjones +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-16 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.237259160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the \"pointers\" - I've not seen that before - obviously not that well documented! ''' +++$+++ Thanks for the "pointers" - I've not seen that before - obviously not that well documented! '''[[User:Ronhjones|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:black; padding:1px;background:yellow"><font color="green">&nbsp;Ron<font color="red">h</font>jones&nbsp;</font></span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Ronhjones|&nbsp;(Talk)]]</sup> 20:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
237 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 236 +++$+++ 236 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.237262220E09 +++$+++ One day, perhaps, I'll get round to documenting them. Any icon can be overlaid on another. The ones in [[:Commons:Category:Icons for canal descriptions\/overlay icons]] might be useful. O1= is first column, O2= is second column, etc.  Regards.  +++$+++ :One day, perhaps, I'll get round to documenting them. Any icon can be overlaid on another. The ones in [[:Commons:Category:Icons for canal descriptions/overlay icons]] might be useful. O1= is first column, O2= is second column, etc.  Regards. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 20:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
238 +++$+++ Ronhjones +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 236 +++$+++ 237 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.237265880E09 +++$+++ Ah, all becomes clear.  I had noticed them on Commons, but they are absent from [[Template:Waterways legend]], which what I usually have open when doing the maps, and is probably why I had completely forgot them.  Maybe I'll get round to adding them there, with a bit of explanation. ''' +++$+++ ::Ah, all becomes clear.  I had noticed them on Commons, but they are absent from [[Template:Waterways legend]], which what I usually have open when doing the maps, and is probably why I had completely forgot them.  Maybe I'll get round to adding them there, with a bit of explanation. '''[[User:Ronhjones|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:black; padding:1px;background:yellow"><font color="green">&nbsp;Ron<font color="red">h</font>jones&nbsp;</font></span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Ronhjones|&nbsp;(Talk)]]</sup> 21:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

262381 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-25 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.295952480E09 +++$+++ I keep agonising over articles I review, especially when they're as good as this one, and I'm a little troubled by this: \"More horses from Jutland were imported to England\". Are Jutlands from Jutland? The lead just says that they're from Denmark. And now I look at it again, it should obviously be \"exported to England\". What a bozo I am!  +++$+++ I keep agonising over articles I review, especially when they're as good as this one, and I'm a little troubled by this: "More horses from Jutland were imported to England". Are Jutlands from Jutland? The lead just says that they're from Denmark. And now I look at it again, it should obviously be "exported to England". What a bozo I am! [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 02:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
262382 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262381 +++$+++ 262381 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.295996340E09 +++$+++ Changed the imported\/exported bit. Denmark makes up part of the [[Jutland Peninsula]] (some of the southern portion now belongs to Germany), but in the Middle Ages, which is what this sentence is describing, there were no borders of Denmark and Germany as we know them today. I could say something like \"More horses from what is now Denmark were exported to England\", if that would work better?  +++$+++ :Changed the imported/exported bit. Denmark makes up part of the [[Jutland Peninsula]] (some of the southern portion now belongs to Germany), but in the Middle Ages, which is what this sentence is describing, there were no borders of Denmark and Germany as we know them today. I could say something like "More horses from what is now Denmark were exported to England", if that would work better? [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 14:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

524526 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-18 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.192753980E09 +++$+++ AnonEMouse, is there a Wikipedia resource on how to include images in an article? I have noticed that the [[Calligraphy]] article has no information on Hebrew calligraphy, and would like to include an image and some information. (I have been a calligrapher by profession for the last thirty years, and know a little about the subject...although Hebrew calligraphy is not part of my work.)  +++$+++ AnonEMouse, is there a Wikipedia resource on how to include images in an article? I have noticed that the [[Calligraphy]] article has no information on Hebrew calligraphy, and would like to include an image and some information. (I have been a calligrapher by profession for the last thirty years, and know a little about the subject...although Hebrew calligraphy is not part of my work.) [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 17:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
524527 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524526 +++$+++ 524526 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.192754400E09 +++$+++ There are lots of image debates that come up with people wanting to include commercial copyrighted pictures in the Wikipedia, which we can't do, but photos of artworks over 100 years old or so are generally considered public domain, and with ancient Hebrew calligraphy you'd be talking about artworks over 1000 years old... -- +++$+++ : There are lots of image debates that come up with people wanting to include commercial copyrighted pictures in the Wikipedia, which we can't do, but photos of artworks over 100 years old or so are generally considered public domain, and with ancient Hebrew calligraphy you'd be talking about artworks over 1000 years old... --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

239 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 239 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-23 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.253760840E09 +++$+++ You may be interested in: [[Talk:William_Bloye#Blue_Gates]]. <span class=\"vcard\"><span class=\"fn\"> +++$+++ You may be interested in: [[Talk:William_Bloye#Blue_Gates]]. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (User:<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Andy's talk]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 19:54, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
240 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 239 +++$+++ 239 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.253811720E09 +++$+++ Thanks Andy. I'm afraid I have no information on this. No hits on Google either.  +++$+++ :Thanks Andy. I'm afraid I have no information on this. No hits on Google either. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 10:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

262384 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262384 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-26 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.296074640E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment\/Jutland (horse)\/1]] is something you ought to see, since the filer wasn't kind enough to leave you a note.  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jutland (horse)/1]] is something you ought to see, since the filer wasn't kind enough to leave you a note. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 12:44, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
262385 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262384 +++$+++ 262384 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.296077580E09 +++$+++ The king of micro-stubs is complaining that the article is too short! *Sigh*.  +++$+++ :The king of micro-stubs is complaining that the article is too short! *Sigh*. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 13:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

241 +++$+++ France3470 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 241 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-22 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.269293220E09 +++$+++ Hello, I'm just sending a quick note to inform you that I have carried out the long overdue split on [[Bellmaking]]. Feel free to read my full explanation at the [[Talk:Bellmaking|talk page]]. I plan to expand the new articles over the next few weeks. Hopefully everything is to your liking.  Have a lovely day, - +++$+++ Hello, I'm just sending a quick note to inform you that I have carried out the long overdue split on [[Bellmaking]]. Feel free to read my full explanation at the [[Talk:Bellmaking|talk page]]. I plan to expand the new articles over the next few weeks. Hopefully everything is to your liking.  Have a lovely day, -[[User:France3470|France3470]] ([[User talk:France3470|talk]]) 14:27, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
242 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 241 +++$+++ 241 +++$+++ 2010-03-22 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.269297660E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for making this split. +++$+++ :Many thanks for making this split.[[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 15:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

262386 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-26 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.296081780E09 +++$+++ No worries Dana I've tripled the number of sources and withdrawn the reassessement. I was concerned with the fact it only used 6 sources and was only 7.5kb. You use google books right? Naturally Malleus cannot take criticism of his reviewing which seems to pay no regard to sourcing..\u2666  +++$+++ No worries Dana I've tripled the number of sources and withdrawn the reassessement. I was concerned with the fact it only used 6 sources and was only 7.5kb. You use google books right? Naturally Malleus cannot take criticism of his reviewing which seems to pay no regard to sourcing..♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 14:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
262387 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262386 +++$+++ 262386 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.296082020E09 +++$+++ I though you were criticising the article on the grounds of it not being comprehensive, but clearly it was just a personal thing, and you were really criticising me. Sad really.  +++$+++ :I though you were criticising the article on the grounds of it not being comprehensive, but clearly it was just a personal thing, and you were really criticising me. Sad really. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 14:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

243 +++$+++ Bob1960evens +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 243 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-26 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.293426180E09 +++$+++ Hi, we got the naming of green tunnel icons wrong on the UK waterways project. They have a tg prefix, which should be a gt prefix. I have created the new icons, uploaded them to commons, fixed the Welsh, Russian and Japanese (scary!) icon lists, altered all maps that used the tg icons, and am left with a few user pages which still use them. Your \/sb7 page uses BSicon_utgSTR, which needs to become BSicon_ugtSTR. I was going to alter it for you, but since it is a user page, thought I would ask first. Once it is all done, the original icons can be deleted from commons.  +++$+++ Hi, we got the naming of green tunnel icons wrong on the UK waterways project. They have a tg prefix, which should be a gt prefix. I have created the new icons, uploaded them to commons, fixed the Welsh, Russian and Japanese (scary!) icon lists, altered all maps that used the tg icons, and am left with a few user pages which still use them. Your /sb7 page uses BSicon_utgSTR, which needs to become BSicon_ugtSTR. I was going to alter it for you, but since it is a user page, thought I would ask first. Once it is all done, the original icons can be deleted from commons. [[User:Bob1960evens|Bob1960evens]] ([[User talk:Bob1960evens|talk]]) 21:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
244 +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ Oosoom +++$+++ 243 +++$+++ 243 +++$+++ 2010-12-26 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.293432900E09 +++$+++ I have changed my \/sb7 user page. Thanks for the consideration and the good work.  +++$+++ :I have changed my /sb7 user page. Thanks for the consideration and the good work. [[User:Oosoom|Oosoom]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red"><sup>[[User talk:Oosoom|Talk]]</sup></span> 22:55, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

262388 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-26 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.296082380E09 +++$+++ Yes, because I have time to waste stalking you Malleus and my sole purpose on wikipedia is to point out your errors. Get a grip!!! The article now has 17 references and is more comprehensive than when I opened up the reassessment.\u2666  +++$+++ Yes, because I have time to waste stalking you Malleus and my sole purpose on wikipedia is to point out your errors. Get a grip!!! The article now has 17 references and is more comprehensive than when I opened up the reassessment.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 14:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
262389 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262388 +++$+++ 262388 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.296082860E09 +++$+++ Perhaps one day you might like to invest a few of your oh so precious moments in actually reading the GA criteria, which do not even once mention the word \"comprehensive\".  +++$+++ :Perhaps one day you might like to invest a few of your oh so precious moments in actually reading the GA criteria, which do not even once mention the word "comprehensive". [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 15:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

245 +++$+++ Ryecatcher773 +++$+++ QuiteUnusual +++$+++ 245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-24 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.293202560E09 +++$+++ Season's greetings to you... as you are already aware, the [[Scott Raab]] article has been vandalized multiple times in the past week by IP login editors, and I'm not quite sure who to ask for protection status for it  -- I see you are an admin, but if you don't have the power do it, could you please pass this request on to someone who might be able to? Thank you, and happy holidays.  +++$+++ Season's greetings to you... as you are already aware, the [[Scott Raab]] article has been vandalized multiple times in the past week by IP login editors, and I'm not quite sure who to ask for protection status for it  -- I see you are an admin, but if you don't have the power do it, could you please pass this request on to someone who might be able to? Thank you, and happy holidays. [[User:Ryecatcher773|Ryecatcher773]] ([[User talk:Ryecatcher773|talk]]) 06:56, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
246 +++$+++ QuiteUnusual +++$+++ QuiteUnusual +++$+++ 245 +++$+++ 245 +++$+++ 2010-12-24 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.293229980E09 +++$+++ Hello, I'm not ad admin here. Requests for page protection are made at [[WP:RPP]]. I don't think it will qualify for protection as there hasn't been much vandalism. Thanks <font color=\"#E66C2C\"> +++$+++ :Hello, I'm not ad admin here. Requests for page protection are made at [[WP:RPP]]. I don't think it will qualify for protection as there hasn't been much vandalism. Thanks <font color="#E66C2C">[[User:QuiteUnusual|'''QU''']]</font> <sup><font color="#306754">[[User talk:QuiteUnusual|TalkQu]]</font></sup> 14:33, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

262390 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-26 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.296085020E09 +++$+++ According to current GA criteria then a \"good article\" could pass GA with a mere 2 references? Do you not think that a good article should be reasonably well researched, and contain a reasonable number of different sources? Of course for some very obscure\/narrow topics it might not be possible to research over 10 sources but in the case of the nice Jutland horse it was possible...   \u2666  +++$+++ According to current GA criteria then a "good article" could pass GA with a mere 2 references? Do you not think that a good article should be reasonably well researched, and contain a reasonable number of different sources? Of course for some very obscure/narrow topics it might not be possible to research over 10 sources but in the case of the nice Jutland horse it was possible...   ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 15:37, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
262391 +++$+++ Ealdgyth +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262390 +++$+++ 262390 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.296085440E09 +++$+++ I think we need to look at what information is, rather than mechanically count the number of references that a given article has. I can't see that any of the information that you added was information that would have failed the article on a \"broad in its coverage\" criteria. Yeah, for FAC, it would have perhaps been an issue, but most of the stuff you added to the article was information that is nice to have (such as on the history) but not anything that is \"needed\" for GA status. \"broad\" and \"covers most major aspects\" is not the same as \"comprehensive\", which is what most folks have been trying to get across to you in this whole episode.  +++$+++ : I think we need to look at what information is, rather than mechanically count the number of references that a given article has. I can't see that any of the information that you added was information that would have failed the article on a "broad in its coverage" criteria. Yeah, for FAC, it would have perhaps been an issue, but most of the stuff you added to the article was information that is nice to have (such as on the history) but not anything that is "needed" for GA status. "broad" and "covers most major aspects" is not the same as "comprehensive", which is what most folks have been trying to get across to you in this whole episode. [[User:Ealdgyth|Ealdgyth]] - [[User talk:Ealdgyth|Talk]] 15:44, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
262392 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262390 +++$+++ 262391 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.296086160E09 +++$+++ Thank you guys for jumping in on this and doing some cleanup. I'm currently going through and re-checking everything. I'm removing a few references that were added for no other reason than bulking up the number (the information was already in there and referenced, and new sources were tacked on after), and a few more copyedits. Dr. Blofield, although you did add some good information, the number of references doesn't matter - the criteria, as Ealdgyth said, is \"broadness\", not comprehensiveness or using every single ref that ever mentioned the topic. Malleus, thank you again for the (as always) wonderful review; Ealdgyth, thanks for helping with the cleanup; and Courcelles, thanks for the notification.  +++$+++ ::Thank you guys for jumping in on this and doing some cleanup. I'm currently going through and re-checking everything. I'm removing a few references that were added for no other reason than bulking up the number (the information was already in there and referenced, and new sources were tacked on after), and a few more copyedits. Dr. Blofield, although you did add some good information, the number of references doesn't matter - the criteria, as Ealdgyth said, is "broadness", not comprehensiveness or using every single ref that ever mentioned the topic. Malleus, thank you again for the (as always) wonderful review; Ealdgyth, thanks for helping with the cleanup; and Courcelles, thanks for the notification. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 15:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
262393 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262390 +++$+++ 262391 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.296086760E09 +++$+++ And Dr. Blofield, could you have please checked your sources more carefully? I just removed three that were talking about Jutland CATTLE, not horses, which I figured out within a few seconds. I welcome collaboration on articles that I work on, but adding sources just for the sake of adding sources and adding sources talking about the wrong topic is really not helpful.  +++$+++ ::And Dr. Blofield, could you have please checked your sources more carefully? I just removed three that were talking about Jutland CATTLE, not horses, which I figured out within a few seconds. I welcome collaboration on articles that I work on, but adding sources just for the sake of adding sources and adding sources talking about the wrong topic is really not helpful. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 16:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

247 +++$+++ Thomas888b +++$+++ QuiteUnusual +++$+++ 247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-29 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.296335880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Thomas888b|Thomas888b]] ([[User talk:Thomas888b|talk]]) 13:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
248 +++$+++ Thomas888b +++$+++ QuiteUnusual +++$+++ 247 +++$+++ 247 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.296344760E09 +++$+++ If so, Could you show support for such a project at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council\/Proposals\/Essex|The WikiProject Essex Proposal Page]]. Thanks,  +++$+++ :If so, Could you show support for such a project at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Essex|The WikiProject Essex Proposal Page]]. Thanks, [[User:Thomas888b|Thomas888b]] ([[User talk:Thomas888b|talk]]) 15:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

524536 +++$+++ Warlordjohncarter +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524536 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-22 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.193083440E09 +++$+++ The article states that in the third paragraph of the \"Early life\" section that the subject says in her autobiography that she was raped twice while her family lived on a ranch in Montana and that it was as a result of her experiences there that she ceased to reside with her family. That was the reason for the inclusion of the category. You'll note that she's now also mentioned as the, to date, single \"Notable resient\" of [[Fromberg, Montana]]. Whether you consider it enough for such inclusion is a decision I cannot make. I will try to replace into more specific categories later today, should the category remain in place.  +++$+++ The article states that in the third paragraph of the "Early life" section that the subject says in her autobiography that she was raped twice while her family lived on a ranch in Montana and that it was as a result of her experiences there that she ceased to reside with her family. That was the reason for the inclusion of the category. You'll note that she's now also mentioned as the, to date, single "Notable resient" of [[Fromberg, Montana]]. Whether you consider it enough for such inclusion is a decision I cannot make. I will try to replace into more specific categories later today, should the category remain in place. [[User:Warlordjohncarter|John Carter]] 13:04, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
524537 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524536 +++$+++ 524536 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.193086080E09 +++$+++ It seems like a passing residence of less than a year. I'm not sure what the criteria for being \"from\" a place are, for purposes of our category, but I thought something more significant more than that, either birth in a place, or long term residence for most of their lives, or their most notable period, would be required. Most modern people change residences quite a few times in their lives, and listing every place they ever lived for even short periods would requires most of our entries to be included in  half a dozen categories of \"people from\". -- +++$+++ : It seems like a passing residence of less than a year. I'm not sure what the criteria for being "from" a place are, for purposes of our category, but I thought something more significant more than that, either birth in a place, or long term residence for most of their lives, or their most notable period, would be required. Most modern people change residences quite a few times in their lives, and listing every place they ever lived for even short periods would requires most of our entries to be included in  half a dozen categories of "people from". --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
524538 +++$+++ Warlordjohncarter +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524536 +++$+++ 524537 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.193086500E09 +++$+++ Actually, several people already are listed in many such categories, like all the pro athlete from Team X categories out there. Not saying that I necessarily disagree with you however. I guess my reasoning here was that this residence, while comparatively short in terms of time, seems to have made a farily serious lasting impact on the subject. I'm not sure whether that in general is considered sufficient cause or not, however.  +++$+++ ::Actually, several people already are listed in many such categories, like all the pro athlete from Team X categories out there. Not saying that I necessarily disagree with you however. I guess my reasoning here was that this residence, while comparatively short in terms of time, seems to have made a farily serious lasting impact on the subject. I'm not sure whether that in general is considered sufficient cause or not, however. [[User:Warlordjohncarter|John Carter]] 13:55, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
524539 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524536 +++$+++ 524538 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.193086620E09 +++$+++ That is a point. Not that it's the best advertisement for Montana, of course; as if [[Ted Kaczynski]] wasn't bad enough. I'll leave it. -- +++$+++ ::: That is a point. Not that it's the best advertisement for Montana, of course; as if [[Ted Kaczynski]] wasn't bad enough. I'll leave it. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

568020 +++$+++ Enigmaman +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568020 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-14 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.205548980E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made{{#if:Paul the Apostle|&#32;to [[:Paul the Apostle]]}}: You may already know about them, but you might find [[Wikipedia:Template messages\/User talk namespace]] useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the [[Wikipedia:sandbox|sandbox]]. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:Uw-warn --> ''' +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made{{#if:Paul the Apostle|&#32;to [[:Paul the Apostle]]}}: You may already know about them, but you might find [[Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace]] useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the [[Wikipedia:sandbox|sandbox]]. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:Uw-warn --> '''[[User:Enigmaman|<font color="blue">Enigma</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:Enigmaman|<b><sup><font color="orange">msg!</font></sup></b>]]'' 19:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
568021 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568020 +++$+++ 568020 +++$+++ 2008-03-14 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.205549220E09 +++$+++ Yes, I was the one who reverted the vandalism on [[Paul the Apostle]], and I usually warn vandals, but I didn't warn that user because I thought you already did. I have been here on Wikipedia for a year already, my first edit day is coming soon, which is March 19. [[User:NHRHS2010|<span style=\"background:black;color:red;font:10pt comic sans ms\">NHRHS<\/span>]][[User talk:NHRHS2010|<span style=\"background:red;color:black;font:10pt verdana\">2010<\/span>]] +++$+++ :Yes, I was the one who reverted the vandalism on [[Paul the Apostle]], and I usually warn vandals, but I didn't warn that user because I thought you already did. I have been here on Wikipedia for a year already, my first edit day is coming soon, which is March 19. [[User:NHRHS2010|<span style="background:black;color:red;font:10pt comic sans ms">NHRHS</span>]][[User talk:NHRHS2010|<span style="background:red;color:black;font:10pt verdana">2010</span>]][[User:NHRHS2010|<font color="red" size="2"></font>]] 19:47, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

262394 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262394 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-26 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.296088920E09 +++$+++ OK thanks Ealdgyth. I agree that the article doesn't need to be perfect and ''that'' advanced but it should surely be sound with plentiful sources. 6 sources really is very low and a 7.5 kb article is very short... The article is actually a lot better and resourceful than it originally appeared but I believe my edits have improved it, even if I picked up a few horses in Jutland rather than Jutland horse and probably needed minor copyedits. As for resourcefulness, [[Clint Eastwood]] is currently undergoing GA and has been put off passing for weeks because the reviewer thought it had to be more comprehensive and kept asking for it to be improved. There just seems to be an extreme difference in what GA reviewers expect for a good article does there not? \u2666  +++$+++ OK thanks Ealdgyth. I agree that the article doesn't need to be perfect and ''that'' advanced but it should surely be sound with plentiful sources. 6 sources really is very low and a 7.5 kb article is very short... The article is actually a lot better and resourceful than it originally appeared but I believe my edits have improved it, even if I picked up a few horses in Jutland rather than Jutland horse and probably needed minor copyedits. As for resourcefulness, [[Clint Eastwood]] is currently undergoing GA and has been put off passing for weeks because the reviewer thought it had to be more comprehensive and kept asking for it to be improved. There just seems to be an extreme difference in what GA reviewers expect for a good article does there not? ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 16:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
262395 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262394 +++$+++ 262394 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.296094440E09 +++$+++ You just don't seem to be getting it. The number of citations is absolutely and utterly irrelevant. The overall size of the article is absolutely and utterly irrelevant. How much plainer can it be said? Of the information you added (ignoring the material you added about Jutland cattle because you didn't bother to check it properly) what in your opinion was sufficiently important to have failed this article's GAN according to the GA criteria?  +++$+++ :You just don't seem to be getting it. The number of citations is absolutely and utterly irrelevant. The overall size of the article is absolutely and utterly irrelevant. How much plainer can it be said? Of the information you added (ignoring the material you added about Jutland cattle because you didn't bother to check it properly) what in your opinion was sufficiently important to have failed this article's GAN according to the GA criteria? [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 18:14, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

252 +++$+++ Canuckle +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 252 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-07 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.181206560E09 +++$+++ Hi. I appreciate where you're coming from with wanting to have separate articles for the school and for the shooting. BUT we just wrapped up a painful series of Deletion discussions for the school, the shooting, the shootign victim and even the guy they named the school after. Can you undo your move and put it back the way it was? Just for the sake of the recently-achieved consensus??  +++$+++ Hi. I appreciate where you're coming from with wanting to have separate articles for the school and for the shooting. BUT we just wrapped up a painful series of Deletion discussions for the school, the shooting, the shootign victim and even the guy they named the school after. Can you undo your move and put it back the way it was? Just for the sake of the recently-achieved consensus?? [[User:Canuckle|Canuckle]] 01:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
253 +++$+++ Canuckle +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.181207580E09 +++$+++ You may not feel like being respectful of the consensus but it would mean a lot to those who have contributed and also be in the spirit of online collaboration. Like you, I do believe the shooting should have a stand-alone article. However, I also think it possible that the school could have its own article. What you've done is eliminate the school article entirely. Go ahead and have a stand-alone article for the shooting. But it would be appreciated if you undid the redirect from the school and at least let it have its own stub again.  +++$+++ **You may not feel like being respectful of the consensus but it would mean a lot to those who have contributed and also be in the spirit of online collaboration. Like you, I do believe the shooting should have a stand-alone article. However, I also think it possible that the school could have its own article. What you've done is eliminate the school article entirely. Go ahead and have a stand-alone article for the shooting. But it would be appreciated if you undid the redirect from the school and at least let it have its own stub again. [[User:Canuckle|Canuckle]] 02:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
254 +++$+++ Canuckle +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.181207820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments. Yes the AfDs were weird. 90% of the current article got stuck in limbo on an upset admin's user page. Feel free to use your common sense but 2 articles are better than one. The school one never had a fair chance to get off the ground on its own steam.  +++$+++ *** Thanks for your comments. Yes the AfDs were weird. 90% of the current article got stuck in limbo on an upset admin's user page. Feel free to use your common sense but 2 articles are better than one. The school one never had a fair chance to get off the ground on its own steam. [[User:Canuckle|Canuckle]] 02:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

524541 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.193263260E09 +++$+++ I think that Wiki Quotes is likely to be the appropriate place for the vast majority of the Bailey quotes. I think that it is safe to assume that that is at least one of the major reasons for its existence.'' Danny Weintraub :'' :  +++$+++ I think that Wiki Quotes is likely to be the appropriate place for the vast majority of the Bailey quotes. I think that it is safe to assume that that is at least one of the major reasons for its existence.'' Danny Weintraub :'' : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 15:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
524542 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524541 +++$+++ 524541 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.193272320E09 +++$+++ None of this is suitable for export to Wikiquote - that is for quotable phrases, not for fragments that are essentially being used as their own references. -- +++$+++ : None of this is suitable for export to Wikiquote - that is for quotable phrases, not for fragments that are essentially being used as their own references. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

262399 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262399 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.296157740E09 +++$+++ Hey Dana, I did a google search of the horse in Danish. I found [http:\/\/www.denjydskehest.dk\/ a website] seemingly dedicated to it! Hopefully this Danish editor can help!\u2666  +++$+++ Hey Dana, I did a google search of the horse in Danish. I found [http://www.denjydskehest.dk/ a website] seemingly dedicated to it! Hopefully this Danish editor can help!♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 11:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
262400 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262399 +++$+++ 262399 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.296163320E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's the breed association. It's already referenced in the article and linked as an external link.  +++$+++ :Yes, that's the breed association. It's already referenced in the article and linked as an external link. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 13:22, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
262401 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262399 +++$+++ 262399 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.296164280E09 +++$+++ Let's put this behind us Dr. Blofeld and move on.  I've had articles I've reviewed taken to GAR before, but usually because I've failed them rather than passed them. In fact I think this might be the first time anyone has taken an article I passed to GAR. But in no case was the decision reversed, so although I may not be the best reviewer on the project I'm happy that I'm not the D-grade reviewer you believe me to be.  +++$+++ :Let's put this behind us Dr. Blofeld and move on.  I've had articles I've reviewed taken to GAR before, but usually because I've failed them rather than passed them. In fact I think this might be the first time anyone has taken an article I passed to GAR. But in no case was the decision reversed, so although I may not be the best reviewer on the project I'm happy that I'm not the D-grade reviewer you believe me to be. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 13:38, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

524545 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524545 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-26 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.193445300E09 +++$+++ In [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Aurora_Snow&diff=167246320&oldid=165479429 this edit] had the above interesting comment. As far as I know, the MOS specifically encourages linking full dates, in [[Wp:date#Autoformatting_and_linking]]. Where do you see otherwise? -- +++$+++ In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aurora_Snow&diff=167246320&oldid=165479429 this edit] had the above interesting comment. As far as I know, the MOS specifically encourages linking full dates, in [[Wp:date#Autoformatting_and_linking]]. Where do you see otherwise? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
524546 +++$+++ Nburden +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524545 +++$+++ 524545 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.193475660E09 +++$+++ The last point on that list.  +++$+++ :The last point on that list. [[User:Nburden|<span style="color:#800">N<span style="color:#a00">b<span style="color:#b00">u'''<span style="color:#c00">r</span>d'''</span>'''e'''</span>'''n'''</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:Nburden|(T)]]</font></sup> 02:01, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
524547 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524545 +++$+++ 524546 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.193511360E09 +++$+++ The examples in [[Wp:date#Dates_of_birth_and_death]] are clear, that dates of birth and death are usually linked. -- +++$+++ :: The examples in [[Wp:date#Dates_of_birth_and_death]] are clear, that dates of birth and death are usually linked. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 11:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

262402 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.296166740E09 +++$+++ Well we both have our qualities and our flaws. We are human after all. I've seen some very good reviews from you actually Malleus <s>and some not so good ones<\/s>. But its the same with me, I have produced very good articles and a lot of poor articles. But that's not because I don't care about the project or quality. I've always tried to meet our goals to \"built an encyclopedia of the highest quality\" and \"the sum of all human knowledge\" which has meant that the quality of my contributions has often differed dramatically as we only have a limited amount of time to get done what we want. Unfortunately in trying to get some mention of the thousands of topics I've started on wikipedia to work towards \"the sum\" this has affected article quality, often embarrasingly so but I can't accompliosh what I want to in the time I have, that's the problem... I would rather if every sub stub I'd created was created as a full length article first time of course... I think it comes down to viewpoint and whether you view wikipedia as an ongoing development which will be around for hundreds of years or an encyclopedia which should be slowly written an article at a time more fully... At times I share either one of these outlooks which is reflective in my writing and the time I spend on each article.... What upset me Malleus was that even before we'd really met and conversed you seemed to despise me and viewed me as a \"bad egg\". Maybe its because of my many stubs or I've done something in the past to hack you off in a public forum because of my view on something or other I don't know but I can assure that we are both here to improve wikipedia together... I think it is a ''good'' thing that you review so many articles and seem to genuinely want to improve our percentage of good articles. As you say, something motivates us to edit in what at times can be an exasperating and belligerent environment, its the love of knowledge and resourcefulness I think.. Anyway lets put this behind us as you say and in future should our paths cross I will try to show greater respect for each others work\/efforts and hope that you would do the same...  \u2666  +++$+++ Well we both have our qualities and our flaws. We are human after all. I've seen some very good reviews from you actually Malleus <s>and some not so good ones</s>. But its the same with me, I have produced very good articles and a lot of poor articles. But that's not because I don't care about the project or quality. I've always tried to meet our goals to "built an encyclopedia of the highest quality" and "the sum of all human knowledge" which has meant that the quality of my contributions has often differed dramatically as we only have a limited amount of time to get done what we want. Unfortunately in trying to get some mention of the thousands of topics I've started on wikipedia to work towards "the sum" this has affected article quality, often embarrasingly so but I can't accompliosh what I want to in the time I have, that's the problem... I would rather if every sub stub I'd created was created as a full length article first time of course... I think it comes down to viewpoint and whether you view wikipedia as an ongoing development which will be around for hundreds of years or an encyclopedia which should be slowly written an article at a time more fully... At times I share either one of these outlooks which is reflective in my writing and the time I spend on each article.... What upset me Malleus was that even before we'd really met and conversed you seemed to despise me and viewed me as a "bad egg". Maybe its because of my many stubs or I've done something in the past to hack you off in a public forum because of my view on something or other I don't know but I can assure that we are both here to improve wikipedia together... I think it is a ''good'' thing that you review so many articles and seem to genuinely want to improve our percentage of good articles. As you say, something motivates us to edit in what at times can be an exasperating and belligerent environment, its the love of knowledge and resourcefulness I think.. Anyway lets put this behind us as you say and in future should our paths cross I will try to show greater respect for each others work/efforts and hope that you would do the same...  ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 14:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
262403 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262402 +++$+++ 262402 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.296171180E09 +++$+++ When have you seen a \"not so good review\" from me? Ah, forget it, we're clearly not going to agree, as we didn't yesterday, and no doubt still won't tomorrow.  +++$+++ :When have you seen a "not so good review" from me? Ah, forget it, we're clearly not going to agree, as we didn't yesterday, and no doubt still won't tomorrow. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 15:33, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

262404 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.296174060E09 +++$+++ Oh we do agree.. But nobody is perfect of course...\u2666  +++$+++ Oh we do agree.. But nobody is perfect of course...♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 16:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
262405 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262404 +++$+++ 262404 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.296174360E09 +++$+++ You may be agreeing with what you think I said, but I'm not agreeing with you. Sure, nobody is perfect, but there are degrees of imperfection. You have yet to admit that you were wrong in your interpretation of the GA criteria, no if, no buts. Length and\/or number of citations is immaterial. You were wrong.  +++$+++ :You may be agreeing with what you think I said, but I'm not agreeing with you. Sure, nobody is perfect, but there are degrees of imperfection. You have yet to admit that you were wrong in your interpretation of the GA criteria, no if, no buts. Length and/or number of citations is immaterial. You were wrong. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 16:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
262406 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262404 +++$+++ 262405 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.296187020E09 +++$+++ OK guys, now everyone hold hands, we'll all sing [[Kumbaya| Kum Ba Ya]] and now that the topic is more general than Dana's article, perhaps we need to all go hoist a [[Guinness]] somewhere and take this off Dana's talk page?   +++$+++ ::OK guys, now everyone hold hands, we'll all sing [[Kumbaya| Kum Ba Ya]] and now that the topic is more general than Dana's article, perhaps we need to all go hoist a [[Guinness]] somewhere and take this off Dana's talk page?  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 19:57, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

524549 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-29 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.193690640E09 +++$+++ I am going to start making edits along with Parsifal and the others . There is still enough of us to maintain a reosonable argument against any claim they make toward consensus . I think the whole matter is an outrage. Please help.  :  +++$+++ I am going to start making edits along with Parsifal and the others . There is still enough of us to maintain a reosonable argument against any claim they make toward consensus . I think the whole matter is an outrage. Please help.  : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 13:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
524550 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524549 +++$+++ 524549 +++$+++ 2007-10-29 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.193691420E09 +++$+++ If Kwork wants to leave, we can't make him stay. If he writes that if unblocked, he will go back to doing whatever he was blocked for, that is not a good sign. By the way, what exactly was that thing he was blocked for? -- +++$+++ : If Kwork wants to leave, we can't make him stay. If he writes that if unblocked, he will go back to doing whatever he was blocked for, that is not a good sign. By the way, what exactly was that thing he was blocked for? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:57, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
524551 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524549 +++$+++ 524550 +++$+++ 2007-10-29 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.193691540E09 +++$+++ Also it bothers me a bit that you seem to think our goal is thwarting consensus. Isn't our goal supposed to be achieving consensus? Note that our definition of [[Wikipedia:consensus]] is a lot laxer around here - we don't insist on complete agreement, just something that all sides can, grudgingly, live with. -- +++$+++ :: Also it bothers me a bit that you seem to think our goal is thwarting consensus. Isn't our goal supposed to be achieving consensus? Note that our definition of [[Wikipedia:consensus]] is a lot laxer around here - we don't insist on complete agreement, just something that all sides can, grudgingly, live with. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

262 +++$+++ Cosprings +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-08 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.194513900E09 +++$+++ What are these soundtracks? I cannot find any info about them. +++$+++ What are these soundtracks? I cannot find any info about them.[[User:Cosprings|Cosprings]] 01:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
263 +++$+++ Cosprings +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 262 +++$+++ 262 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.194771720E09 +++$+++ On the [[Cousin Skeeter]] page +++$+++ :On the [[Cousin Skeeter]] page[[User:Cosprings|Cosprings]] 01:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

87425 +++$+++ CronopioFlotante +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87425 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-16 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.250453100E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:CronopioFlotante|CronopioFlotante]] ([[User talk:CronopioFlotante|talk]]) 13:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
87426 +++$+++ Crusio +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87425 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.250454000E09 +++$+++ I'm a journal editor myself (albeit in a different field) and I absolutely ''hate'' those idiotic rankings. An editor's function is to evaluate a manuscript, ''not'' to evaluate a certain researcher. Dreher's '''best''' publication is the one that had the most impact on the field, who cares where it was pubished (for all I care in the ''Monaco weekly jeu-de-boule report''). Those rankings are made by and for bean counters who want a shortcut to \"evaluate\" scientists, without having to bother with actually reading their papers. The father of the impact factor, Eugene Garfield, has always warned about using such rankings for the evaluation of individuals. These rankings may compare ''journals'' and can be useful for librarians in helping them decide which journals they absolutely need and which ones they can do without. Nothing less, but certainly not anything more like judging ''individuals''. -- +++$+++ :*I'm a journal editor myself (albeit in a different field) and I absolutely ''hate'' those idiotic rankings. An editor's function is to evaluate a manuscript, ''not'' to evaluate a certain researcher. Dreher's '''best''' publication is the one that had the most impact on the field, who cares where it was pubished (for all I care in the ''Monaco weekly jeu-de-boule report''). Those rankings are made by and for bean counters who want a shortcut to "evaluate" scientists, without having to bother with actually reading their papers. The father of the impact factor, Eugene Garfield, has always warned about using such rankings for the evaluation of individuals. These rankings may compare ''journals'' and can be useful for librarians in helping them decide which journals they absolutely need and which ones they can do without. Nothing less, but certainly not anything more like judging ''individuals''. --[[User:Crusio|Crusio]] ([[User talk:Crusio|talk]]) 13:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
87427 +++$+++ CronopioFlotante +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87425 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.250455140E09 +++$+++ And by using the h-index, you may be implicitly measuring impact in the field by the number of citations in journals like the ''Monaco weekly jeu-de-boule report'' in a similar bean-counting activity. Anyway, let's not discuss anymore. I am willing to accept the h-index doctrine for lack of anything better. -- +++$+++ :* And by using the h-index, you may be implicitly measuring impact in the field by the number of citations in journals like the ''Monaco weekly jeu-de-boule report'' in a similar bean-counting activity. Anyway, let's not discuss anymore. I am willing to accept the h-index doctrine for lack of anything better. --[[User:CronopioFlotante|CronopioFlotante]] ([[User talk:CronopioFlotante|talk]]) 13:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
87428 +++$+++ Crusio +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87425 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.250455320E09 +++$+++ Very true, it's a form of bean counting, too, but on a ''personal'' level. Evaluating a scientist by the impact factor, one assumes that all articles published in a journal have the same impact, which is patently false. And I am against using h for promotion and tenure decisions, and such. I have less of a problem using it for WP as it is a ''rough'' measure of how much interest someone's articles have garnered. -- +++$+++ ::*Very true, it's a form of bean counting, too, but on a ''personal'' level. Evaluating a scientist by the impact factor, one assumes that all articles published in a journal have the same impact, which is patently false. And I am against using h for promotion and tenure decisions, and such. I have less of a problem using it for WP as it is a ''rough'' measure of how much interest someone's articles have garnered. --[[User:Crusio|Crusio]] ([[User talk:Crusio|talk]]) 13:42, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
87429 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87425 +++$+++ 87425 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.250483280E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ :Regards, [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 21:28, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
87430 +++$+++ CronopioFlotante +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87425 +++$+++ 87425 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.250484480E09 +++$+++ Thank you Qwfp for your kind response. When I said that citations were low, I based this on the citations rank on the IDEAS webpage (which is what economists like me are more familiar with). I was not familiar with citation counting on Google Scholar and the h-index at that point. Best. -- +++$+++ :Thank you Qwfp for your kind response. When I said that citations were low, I based this on the citations rank on the IDEAS webpage (which is what economists like me are more familiar with). I was not familiar with citation counting on Google Scholar and the h-index at that point. Best. --[[User:CronopioFlotante|CronopioFlotante]] ([[User talk:CronopioFlotante|talk]]) 21:48, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
87431 +++$+++ CronopioFlotante +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87425 +++$+++ 87430 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.250484780E09 +++$+++ On a somewhat unrelated point, regarding reputations of academic publishing companies, are you aware of the [[Elsevier#Fake_journals|Elsevier-affair]]? -- +++$+++ :* On a somewhat unrelated point, regarding reputations of academic publishing companies, are you aware of the [[Elsevier#Fake_journals|Elsevier-affair]]? --[[User:CronopioFlotante|CronopioFlotante]] ([[User talk:CronopioFlotante|talk]]) 21:53, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
87432 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87425 +++$+++ 87430 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.250486160E09 +++$+++ It sounds vaguely familiar, yes; I think I probably read about it on [[Ben Goldacre]]'s blog. Elsevier have never been my favourite publishing company (partly for the reasons listed at the start of [[Elsevier#Criticism and controversies]], as well as others I won't go into and can't fully remember myself as its really [[Pergamon Press|ancient history now]]...). Time I signed off for tonight I'm afraid,  +++$+++ ::It sounds vaguely familiar, yes; I think I probably read about it on [[Ben Goldacre]]'s blog. Elsevier have never been my favourite publishing company (partly for the reasons listed at the start of [[Elsevier#Criticism and controversies]], as well as others I won't go into and can't fully remember myself as its really [[Pergamon Press|ancient history now]]...). Time I signed off for tonight I'm afraid, [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 22:16, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

262408 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-26 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.296112080E09 +++$+++ Dana, I'd like to update the portal with new WPEQ GA and FA articles, but Im not sure how many are out there because quite a pile came in at once.  Can you peek at the portal and tell me which ones; of yours need to be added?  Thanks!   +++$+++ Dana, I'd like to update the portal with new WPEQ GA and FA articles, but Im not sure how many are out there because quite a pile came in at once.  Can you peek at the portal and tell me which ones; of yours need to be added?  Thanks!  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 23:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
262409 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262408 +++$+++ 262408 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.296115440E09 +++$+++ I think that [[American Cream Draft]] and [[Jutland (horse)]] are the only two breed ones that are missing. Plus, do we want to add [[American Livestock Breeds Conservancy]] to the general spot? It's not exactly about horses, but is tangentially related. On that subject, I'm toying with taking ALBC to FAC at some point. If you stumble across any third-party sources that I've missed, would you please let me know? There are still a few spots that feel rather thin, but I'm running out of places to look...  +++$+++ :I think that [[American Cream Draft]] and [[Jutland (horse)]] are the only two breed ones that are missing. Plus, do we want to add [[American Livestock Breeds Conservancy]] to the general spot? It's not exactly about horses, but is tangentially related. On that subject, I'm toying with taking ALBC to FAC at some point. If you stumble across any third-party sources that I've missed, would you please let me know? There are still a few spots that feel rather thin, but I'm running out of places to look... [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 00:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
262410 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262408 +++$+++ 262409 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.296118200E09 +++$+++ Maybe surf Sponenberg's bio at the University web site (or elsewhere) for any peer-reviewed publications on the topic that might be listed in his curriculum vitae: [http:\/\/www.vetmed.vt.edu\/org\/dbsp\/faculty\/sponenberg.asp]  He's heavily involved with the group, so maybe a search on ALBC and Sponenberg would be fruitful?   +++$+++ ::Maybe surf Sponenberg's bio at the University web site (or elsewhere) for any peer-reviewed publications on the topic that might be listed in his curriculum vitae: [http://www.vetmed.vt.edu/org/dbsp/faculty/sponenberg.asp]  He's heavily involved with the group, so maybe a search on ALBC and Sponenberg would be fruitful?  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 00:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

265 +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 265 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-25 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.196046900E09 +++$+++ Just by looking at your recent contributions, I thought you might be interested in this project.  +++$+++ Just by looking at your recent contributions, I thought you might be interested in this project. [[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] ([[User talk:Futurebird|talk]]) 19:15, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
266 +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 265 +++$+++ 265 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.196047920E09 +++$+++ Great! Glad that you joined. You should add the project page to your watchlist, so you'll know what's happening. If you need help with any article or want to solicit more opinions on any African Diaspora related topic you can post to the talk page at [[WP:AFRO]] <-- that's our handy short cut, that make the project page easy to find. :) Cheers! +++$+++ :Great! Glad that you joined. You should add the project page to your watchlist, so you'll know what's happening. If you need help with any article or want to solicit more opinions on any African Diaspora related topic you can post to the talk page at [[WP:AFRO]] <-- that's our handy short cut, that make the project page easy to find. :) Cheers![[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] ([[User talk:Futurebird|talk]]) 19:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

262411 +++$+++ Ealdgyth +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-30 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.296455340E09 +++$+++ The Remigius stuff is perfect and came through well. Now to find the time to deal with it. Today was ... strip all the stalls, fill them again, clean barn, etc. We're getting a huge winter storm, and needed to get that done before we hit blizzard conditions. Thanks again! (I gussied up [[Mechanical hackamore]] as partial payment the other day...)  +++$+++ The Remigius stuff is perfect and came through well. Now to find the time to deal with it. Today was ... strip all the stalls, fill them again, clean barn, etc. We're getting a huge winter storm, and needed to get that done before we hit blizzard conditions. Thanks again! (I gussied up [[Mechanical hackamore]] as partial payment the other day...) [[User:Ealdgyth|Ealdgyth]] - [[User talk:Ealdgyth|Talk]] 22:29, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
262412 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262411 +++$+++ 262411 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.296546600E09 +++$+++ We just went from 50 above to 20 below here over the last couple of days.  I didn't get the shelter cleaned out before it froze again! Not a lot of snow here, but it will be picking up a lot of moisture over then next 1000 miles, I hear!  Brace for impact!  :-P   +++$+++ :We just went from 50 above to 20 below here over the last couple of days.  I didn't get the shelter cleaned out before it froze again! Not a lot of snow here, but it will be picking up a lot of moisture over then next 1000 miles, I hear!  Brace for impact!  :-P  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 23:50, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
262413 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262411 +++$+++ 262412 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.296542040E09 +++$+++ A 70-degree drop in two days? Where the Hell do you live, Mars?  +++$+++ ::A 70-degree drop in two days? Where the Hell do you live, Mars? [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 22:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
262414 +++$+++ Ealdgyth +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262411 +++$+++ 262413 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.296542340E09 +++$+++ Montana .. that's Montanabw that put that above comment. I've added the unsigned.  +++$+++ ::: Montana .. that's Montanabw that put that above comment. I've added the unsigned. [[User:Ealdgyth|Ealdgyth]] - [[User talk:Ealdgyth|Talk]] 22:39, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
262415 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262411 +++$+++ 262414 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.296546600E09 +++$+++ Proof (LOL):   [http:\/\/www.wunderground.com\/history\/airport\/KHLN\/2011\/1\/28\/DailyHistory.html?req_city=NA&req_state=NA&req_statename=NA January 28] and [http:\/\/www.wunderground.com\/history\/airport\/KHLN\/2011\/1\/31\/DailyHistory.html?req_city=NA&req_state=NA&req_statename=NA last night - official, but it was 18 below at my house]. So, OK, I rounded the low, but there was also a wind chill on top of it!  And lest youthink I exaggerate, [http:\/\/www.wunderground.com\/cgi-bin\/findweather\/getForecast?query=59602&wuSelect=WEATHER here's the forecast!]  But that's nothing. When a [[chinook wind]] is over, it's OVER. See [[Loma, Montana]]!   +++$+++ :::: Proof (LOL):   [http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KHLN/2011/1/28/DailyHistory.html?req_city=NA&req_state=NA&req_statename=NA January 28] and [http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KHLN/2011/1/31/DailyHistory.html?req_city=NA&req_state=NA&req_statename=NA last night - official, but it was 18 below at my house]. So, OK, I rounded the low, but there was also a wind chill on top of it!  And lest youthink I exaggerate, [http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=59602&wuSelect=WEATHER here's the forecast!]  But that's nothing. When a [[chinook wind]] is over, it's OVER. See [[Loma, Montana]]!  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 23:50, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
262416 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262411 +++$+++ 262415 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.296548880E09 +++$+++ It was the drop from 50 above I didn't believe, and still don't. Maybe 5 above?  +++$+++ :::::It was the drop from 50 above I didn't believe, and still don't. Maybe 5 above? [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 00:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
262417 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262411 +++$+++ 262416 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.296551280E09 +++$+++ LOL, you apparently need to spend some time in the northern midwestern US :) I've seen 30 degree drops in 4 hours, and close to 70 in two days, and I live near a [[Lake Michigan|big lake]] that regulates temperature better than they do in Montana.  +++$+++ ::::::LOL, you apparently need to spend some time in the northern midwestern US :) I've seen 30 degree drops in 4 hours, and close to 70 in two days, and I live near a [[Lake Michigan|big lake]] that regulates temperature better than they do in Montana. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 01:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
262418 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262411 +++$+++ 262417 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.296557940E09 +++$+++ I've been to hot places in the world, and I know what 40 \xb0C feels like, never mind 50 \xb0C. I've got no problem with 20 below, it even gets down to that here sometimes, but I'm not swallowing 50 above in January.  +++$+++ :::::::I've been to hot places in the world, and I know what 40 °C feels like, never mind 50 °C. I've got no problem with 20 below, it even gets down to that here sometimes, but I'm not swallowing 50 above in January. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 02:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
262419 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262411 +++$+++ 262418 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.296609780E09 +++$+++ Ah!  I was discussing degrees fahrenheit!  In Celsius, we had a high of 10 C ( =50 F) and a drop to -28.8 C as of last night (when our thermometer DID say 20 below, though the official low in town was a bit higher.  Yeah, 50 C = 122 F, which is a bit toastier than even Montana in August most of the time! (though I do remember one summer in eastern Montana where it got scary close to 120 F.)  What's weird is that while 20 and 30 below are different in C and F degrees, -40 C = -40 F.  What's up with that? What we have out here is a [[continental climate]] and though wiki doesn't agree, we also have a Cold [[Semi-arid climate]].  We like to compare ourselves to Siberia, except we're tougher!  LOL!   +++$+++ ::::::::Ah!  I was discussing degrees fahrenheit!  In Celsius, we had a high of 10 C ( =50 F) and a drop to -28.8 C as of last night (when our thermometer DID say 20 below, though the official low in town was a bit higher.  Yeah, 50 C = 122 F, which is a bit toastier than even Montana in August most of the time! (though I do remember one summer in eastern Montana where it got scary close to 120 F.)  What's weird is that while 20 and 30 below are different in C and F degrees, -40 C = -40 F.  What's up with that? What we have out here is a [[continental climate]] and though wiki doesn't agree, we also have a Cold [[Semi-arid climate]].  We like to compare ourselves to Siberia, except we're tougher!  LOL!  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 17:23, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
262420 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262411 +++$+++ 262419 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.296640920E09 +++$+++ That would explain it; I automatically assumed Celsius, should have known better. We're still quite ambivalent about metric vs imperial units here in the UK. We talk about miles per gallon, but we can only buy fuel in litres, and our road signs all show miles. The Fahrenheit scale has pretty been dumped though, Celsius is so much more logical.  +++$+++ :::::::::That would explain it; I automatically assumed Celsius, should have known better. We're still quite ambivalent about metric vs imperial units here in the UK. We talk about miles per gallon, but we can only buy fuel in litres, and our road signs all show miles. The Fahrenheit scale has pretty been dumped though, Celsius is so much more logical. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 02:02, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

524556 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-29 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.193696460E09 +++$+++ It looks like Jpgordon  blocked him for failing to shut up on command.  Please comment. :  +++$+++ It looks like Jpgordon  blocked him for failing to shut up on command.  Please comment. : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 15:21, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
524557 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524556 +++$+++ 524556 +++$+++ 2007-10-29 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.193700720E09 +++$+++ He came close.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Alice_Bailey&diff=prev&oldid=167300026] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Alice_Bailey&diff=prev&oldid=167414108] But that's splitting hairs. The important point is that article talk pages are for discussing how to improve the article. They're not for attacking anyone, not even the long-dead article subject. There is a noticeable difference between writing \"the article subject is a vicious antisemitic liar, and anyone who follows her is a halfwit\", and \"we should write in our article that the following reliable sources question the veracity of the article subject\". The article talk page is for discussing the latter. It is not for discussing the former. If Kwork understands the difference, and can promise to stick to improving the article, and not go off on rather harsh attacks on anyone who follows AAB, I'll unblock him myself. Or, rather, I'll ask JPGordon if he minds first, but from reading JPGordon's talk page, I gather he wants to wash his hands of the whole sordid mess, so I think he won't mind. -- +++$+++ : He came close.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alice_Bailey&diff=prev&oldid=167300026] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alice_Bailey&diff=prev&oldid=167414108] But that's splitting hairs. The important point is that article talk pages are for discussing how to improve the article. They're not for attacking anyone, not even the long-dead article subject. There is a noticeable difference between writing "the article subject is a vicious antisemitic liar, and anyone who follows her is a halfwit", and "we should write in our article that the following reliable sources question the veracity of the article subject". The article talk page is for discussing the latter. It is not for discussing the former. If Kwork understands the difference, and can promise to stick to improving the article, and not go off on rather harsh attacks on anyone who follows AAB, I'll unblock him myself. Or, rather, I'll ask JPGordon if he minds first, but from reading JPGordon's talk page, I gather he wants to wash his hands of the whole sordid mess, so I think he won't mind. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:32, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

524559 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.193795580E09 +++$+++ Actually Wiki's arbcom has declared most of the tpyes of articles psuedo-scientific. I know that this makes for a sad state of affairs amongst the believers but it is just the way things are. Neutrality is is in the eye of the beholder, :  +++$+++ Actually Wiki's arbcom has declared most of the tpyes of articles psuedo-scientific. I know that this makes for a sad state of affairs amongst the believers but it is just the way things are. Neutrality is is in the eye of the beholder, : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 18:53, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
524560 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524559 +++$+++ 524559 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.193803740E09 +++$+++ I really hope I'm not speaking into the wind. I write this, and people seem to listen for a while, and then I get posts about how some other editor feels about Gentiles, or how whether Bailey is a liar, or Sjoo is a nut case. This isn't about our philosophies, folks. This is only about an encyclopedia article. We aren't here to write the truth, merely what other people wrote. If Bailey is a liar (or a saint) - so what? We still write what she wrote. If Sjoo is a nut case (or brilliant) - so what? We still write what she wrote. Our article is supposed to reflect what the world thinks, not [[Wikipedia:The Truth]]. -- +++$+++ : I really hope I'm not speaking into the wind. I write this, and people seem to listen for a while, and then I get posts about how some other editor feels about Gentiles, or how whether Bailey is a liar, or Sjoo is a nut case. This isn't about our philosophies, folks. This is only about an encyclopedia article. We aren't here to write the truth, merely what other people wrote. If Bailey is a liar (or a saint) - so what? We still write what she wrote. If Sjoo is a nut case (or brilliant) - so what? We still write what she wrote. Our article is supposed to reflect what the world thinks, not [[Wikipedia:The Truth]]. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 21:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

453919 +++$+++ Jnc +++$+++ Benc +++$+++ 453919 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-10-09 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.097360400E09 +++$+++ I do really like the way you put the actual debates on a separate page, as opposed to inline, the way VfD\/Precendents does it - it makes for a much easier to read page. You might want to suggest on [[WT:VfD]] that we do the same thing there - the VfD\/Precedents page is really long, and hard to use.  +++$+++ I do really like the way you put the actual debates on a separate page, as opposed to inline, the way VfD/Precendents does it - it makes for a much easier to read page. You might want to suggest on [[WT:VfD]] that we do the same thing there - the VfD/Precedents page is really long, and hard to use. [[User:Jnc|Noel]] 15:20, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
453920 +++$+++ Jnc +++$+++ Benc +++$+++ 453919 +++$+++ 453919 +++$+++ 2004-10-10 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.097393940E09 +++$+++ Hunh. It turns out there is a talk page for the VfD\/Precedents subpage, at [[Wikipedia_talk:Votes_for_deletion\/Precedents]]. So I guess my suggestion immediately above ought to be directed there instead.  +++$+++ : Hunh. It turns out there is a talk page for the VfD/Precedents subpage, at [[Wikipedia_talk:Votes_for_deletion/Precedents]]. So I guess my suggestion immediately above ought to be directed there instead. [[User:Jnc|Noel]] 00:39, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

273 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 273 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-18 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.198028460E09 +++$+++ Actually, regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rihanna&diff=178755574&oldid=178755170 this], it wasn't your edit that I intended to revert. In fact, I didn't even know you had edited. When I made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rihanna&diff=prev&oldid=178755050 this edit], I had done it less than a minute after you made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rihanna&diff=prev&oldid=178754841 your edit]. You made your first edit while I was making mine, and my revert of your edit was a mistake. I hope that explains things.  +++$+++ Actually, regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rihanna&diff=178755574&oldid=178755170 this], it wasn't your edit that I intended to revert. In fact, I didn't even know you had edited. When I made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rihanna&diff=prev&oldid=178755050 this edit], I had done it less than a minute after you made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rihanna&diff=prev&oldid=178754841 your edit]. You made your first edit while I was making mine, and my revert of your edit was a mistake. I hope that explains things. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
274 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 273 +++$+++ 273 +++$+++ 2007-12-18 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.198029060E09 +++$+++ Good, thanks. :) Sorry about the initial confusion. Seasons greetings to you too.  +++$+++ :Good, thanks. :) Sorry about the initial confusion. Seasons greetings to you too. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

276 +++$+++ AEMoreira042281 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-08 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.199828940E09 +++$+++ The picture in question in that article was shot in the same sequence as a Classic and Fishbowl shot on the TTC 54 bus line. Which station does the TTC 54 serve? This is pic [http:\/\/img.photobucket.com\/albums\/v516\/aemoreira81\/GTA\/TTC\/6223.jpg 1] and this is pic [http:\/\/img.photobucket.com\/albums\/v516\/aemoreira81\/GTA\/TTC\/2280.jpg 2], taken at the same location. -- +++$+++ The picture in question in that article was shot in the same sequence as a Classic and Fishbowl shot on the TTC 54 bus line. Which station does the TTC 54 serve? This is pic [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/aemoreira81/GTA/TTC/6223.jpg 1] and this is pic [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/aemoreira81/GTA/TTC/2280.jpg 2], taken at the same location. --[[User:AEMoreira042281|AEMoreira042281]] ([[User talk:AEMoreira042281|talk]]) 13:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
277 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 276 +++$+++ 276 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.200113940E09 +++$+++ I doubt that she is. I think she's only African-American, but after she hooked up with Rohan Marley everyone started calling her Jamaican, lol.  +++$+++ :I doubt that she is. I think she's only African-American, but after she hooked up with Rohan Marley everyone started calling her Jamaican, lol. [[User:Blackjays1|Blackjays1]] ([[User talk:Blackjays1#top|talk]]) 20:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

278 +++$+++ Bellagio99 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-19 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.200783060E09 +++$+++ See my comments to your edits on the [[Oscar Peterson]] page. respectfully.  +++$+++ See my comments to your edits on the [[Oscar Peterson]] page. respectfully. [[User:Bellagio99|Bellagio99]] ([[User talk:Bellagio99|talk]]) 14:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
279 +++$+++ Bellagio99 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 278 +++$+++ 278 +++$+++ 2008-01-20 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.200885420E09 +++$+++ Could you take the time to check the quotes from Bob Rae, etc. at the memorial concert -- it's on CBC2 downloads -- but I have 4 deadlines this week and am also away. I hand transcribed at the concert (were you there?), but may have gotten a few words wrong.  +++$+++ : Could you take the time to check the quotes from Bob Rae, etc. at the memorial concert -- it's on CBC2 downloads -- but I have 4 deadlines this week and am also away. I hand transcribed at the concert (were you there?), but may have gotten a few words wrong. [[User:Bellagio99|Bellagio99]] ([[User talk:Bellagio99|talk]]) 19:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

524568 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-01 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.193959020E09 +++$+++ Ok Thank you very much. I assume its ok to use sources that I find at the library. Yes  ? :  +++$+++ Ok Thank you very much. I assume its ok to use sources that I find at the library. Yes  ? : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 16:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
524569 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524568 +++$+++ 524568 +++$+++ 2007-11-01 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.193959140E09 +++$+++ Absolutely. Print sources are excellent. You generally want to give title, author, publication date (ISBN if possible), and page number. -- +++$+++ : Absolutely. Print sources are excellent. You generally want to give title, author, publication date (ISBN if possible), and page number. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:19, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

262427 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-02 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.296714420E09 +++$+++ [Insert lame joke about \"hold your horses\" here.]  I've left some thoughts at the usual place for your reply in due course. Regards,  +++$+++ [Insert lame joke about "hold your horses" here.]  I've left some thoughts at the usual place for your reply in due course. Regards, [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 22:27, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
262428 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262427 +++$+++ 262427 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.296879420E09 +++$+++ Hooray for trains with free wireless access.  All is fine and a GA pass it is. Yours,  +++$+++ :Hooray for trains with free wireless access.  All is fine and a GA pass it is. Yours, [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 20:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

262429 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262429 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-03 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.296799320E09 +++$+++ Hi, I note you are experienced in both military articles and the GA\/FA process.  Is there any chance you could stop by [[Talk:Quebec Expedition\/GA1]] and express an opinion on the embedded list that appears in that article?  My concern is that it appears to represent a level of detail disproportionate to the rest of the article, and that it's not analogous to naval battle articles where fleets are listed because here the fleet never saw battle.  I would appreciate a second opinion from someone experienced in working with high quality military articles. -  +++$+++ Hi, I note you are experienced in both military articles and the GA/FA process.  Is there any chance you could stop by [[Talk:Quebec Expedition/GA1]] and express an opinion on the embedded list that appears in that article?  My concern is that it appears to represent a level of detail disproportionate to the rest of the article, and that it's not analogous to naval battle articles where fleets are listed because here the fleet never saw battle.  I would appreciate a second opinion from someone experienced in working with high quality military articles. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 22:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
262430 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262429 +++$+++ 262429 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.296860820E09 +++$+++ I've left a comment on the GA review page.  +++$+++ :I've left a comment on the GA review page. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 15:07, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

564940 +++$+++ 70.137.161.241 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ 564940 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-20 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.213961880E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/70.137.161.241|70.137.161.241]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/70.137.161.241|70.137.161.241]] ([[User talk:70.137.161.241|talk]]) 04:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
564941 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ 564940 +++$+++ 564940 +++$+++ 2008-06-21 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.214080800E09 +++$+++ I hope you'll be able to help with enforcing [[WP:Talk]] here (see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALiteraturegeek&diff=220764193&oldid=220638122 diff], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThegoodson&diff=220767554&oldid=220638868 diff] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:70.137.161.241&diff=prev&oldid=220764582 diff]). I think this will help sort things out more quickly - more light less heat.  +++$+++ :I hope you'll be able to help with enforcing [[WP:Talk]] here (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALiteraturegeek&diff=220764193&oldid=220638122 diff], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThegoodson&diff=220767554&oldid=220638868 diff] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:70.137.161.241&diff=prev&oldid=220764582 diff]). I think this will help sort things out more quickly - more light less heat. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 13:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

262431 +++$+++ Miyagawa +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-04 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.296871920E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ Regards, [[User:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">Miyagawa</font>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">(talk)</font>]] 18:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
262432 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262431 +++$+++ 262431 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.296876300E09 +++$+++ That would be awesome! I'm horrible at making maps, so it would be really helpful. When I get started on the list I'll let you know...  +++$+++ :That would be awesome! I'm horrible at making maps, so it would be really helpful. When I get started on the list I'll let you know... [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 19:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

524576 +++$+++ Parsifal +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-02 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.194004200E09 +++$+++ Hi AnonEMouse...  I had added a note about this following a long comment above on your talk page, but on re-reading it later I decided to remove my note, to avoid any impression that it was a direct response, which it was not.  Mainly I just wanted to let you know that the reference mentioned in the comment as not supporting the article text appeared to simply be a wrong page number listed in the article.  The correct page numbers, in the same book, are 69-71;  In the downloadable files, it's this one: edu1023.html .  The content of the paragraph seems to be supported by the reference, with the corrected page numbers.  I did not write that paragraph in the article, I don't know who wrote it, but after finding the correct page numbers,  I've corrected the page number in the article footnote.    -- +++$+++ Hi AnonEMouse...  I had added a note about this following a long comment above on your talk page, but on re-reading it later I decided to remove my note, to avoid any impression that it was a direct response, which it was not.  Mainly I just wanted to let you know that the reference mentioned in the comment as not supporting the article text appeared to simply be a wrong page number listed in the article.  The correct page numbers, in the same book, are 69-71;  In the downloadable files, it's this one: edu1023.html .  The content of the paragraph seems to be supported by the reference, with the corrected page numbers.  I did not write that paragraph in the article, I don't know who wrote it, but after finding the correct page numbers,  I've corrected the page number in the article footnote.    --[[User:Parsifal|Parsifal]] [[User talk:Parsifal|<sub>Hello</sub>]] 04:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
524577 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.194046440E09 +++$+++ Sorry for not responding earlier, you placed this comment at the top of my talk page in the archivebox comment. I semi-protected [[The Hamsters]] and its talk page because what was going on was not discussion but namecalling and abuse. Others had tried to remove the abuse and respond to the actual substantive comments, but it was repeatedly restored. -- +++$+++ : Sorry for not responding earlier, you placed this comment at the top of my talk page in the archivebox comment. I semi-protected [[The Hamsters]] and its talk page because what was going on was not discussion but namecalling and abuse. Others had tried to remove the abuse and respond to the actual substantive comments, but it was repeatedly restored. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
524578 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.194046440E09 +++$+++ This is called \"how the sausage is made\" :-). No, I would prefer others to perceive the Wikipedia works by polite, reasoned discussion, recognizing that all sides want to improve the encyclopedia, and trying to reach agreement, or at least compromise. But it does occasionally happen that people edit not in good faith, but instead in order to damage the encyclopedia, for whatever reason. When that happens, we have to do things such as [[WP:PROT|protect articles]] and [[WP:BLOCK|block users]]. -- +++$+++ : This is called "how the sausage is made" :-). No, I would prefer others to perceive the Wikipedia works by polite, reasoned discussion, recognizing that all sides want to improve the encyclopedia, and trying to reach agreement, or at least compromise. But it does occasionally happen that people edit not in good faith, but instead in order to damage the encyclopedia, for whatever reason. When that happens, we have to do things such as [[WP:PROT|protect articles]] and [[WP:BLOCK|block users]]. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
524579 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.194052440E09 +++$+++ The specific dates for the magazines are given. The online version on the magazine's own sites aren't very thorough, either only having the current issues, or not going back that far. -- +++$+++ : The specific dates for the magazines are given. The online version on the magazine's own sites aren't very thorough, either only having the current issues, or not going back that far. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
524580 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.194052500E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, I have no idea what the Drake Circus is. But I guess I need to look. One moment... -- +++$+++ : I'm sorry, I have no idea what the Drake Circus is. But I guess I need to look. One moment... --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
524581 +++$+++ WebHamster +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ 524580 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.194052920E09 +++$+++ To further help, there are two articles involved in this, i.e. [[Drake Circus]] an article about an area in Plymouth, and [[Drake Circus Shopping Centre]] a seemingly controversial shopping mall. For some reason there seems to be several anon IP editors getting up in arms about how the articles conflict and are allegedly causing upset, defamation and copyright infringements to residents and businesses in the area. The talk pages of both articles should give you the run down. ----  +++$+++ ::To further help, there are two articles involved in this, i.e. [[Drake Circus]] an article about an area in Plymouth, and [[Drake Circus Shopping Centre]] a seemingly controversial shopping mall. For some reason there seems to be several anon IP editors getting up in arms about how the articles conflict and are allegedly causing upset, defamation and copyright infringements to residents and businesses in the area. The talk pages of both articles should give you the run down. ---- [[User:WebHamster|<font color="#000000">'''W'''eb'''H'''amste</font><font color="#0000ff">r</font>]] 18:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
524582 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ 524580 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.194053580E09 +++$+++ If that is basically right, then I, at least, would be pleased as punch if the DC article were to be expanded explaining about Reynolds and Babbage and other things. With references, hopefully. However, I fear that if it were unprotected, it would, instead, be used to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Drake_Circus&diff=prev&oldid=168205397 remove any reference to DCSC] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Drake_Circus&diff=168062236&oldid=168061766 add a list of shops]. Any assurances otherwise? -- +++$+++ :: If that is basically right, then I, at least, would be pleased as punch if the DC article were to be expanded explaining about Reynolds and Babbage and other things. With references, hopefully. However, I fear that if it were unprotected, it would, instead, be used to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Drake_Circus&diff=prev&oldid=168205397 remove any reference to DCSC] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Drake_Circus&diff=168062236&oldid=168061766 add a list of shops]. Any assurances otherwise? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
524583 +++$+++ WebHamster +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.194054420E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict) Yup, bang on the nose, you've got it. Meanwhile [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] and myself are caught in the middle by trying to explain the rules and stopping the articles turning into another battle of the Somme. My involvement was initiated when I slapped a CSD notice on an attempt to create a 3rd article [[Drakecircus]] (now a redirect to the shopping centre). During the edit war [[User:Yiwentang|Yiwentang]] was blocked due to retaliatory vandalism, as were several anon IPs from various members of the Student's Union of Plymouth Uni. A couple of the IPs were the aforementioned user's sockpuppets. additionally 4 or 5 articles have had to be protected and still the crap flies. Personally I'd delete both articles as neither have demonstrated notability per se. ----  +++$+++ :::: (edit conflict) Yup, bang on the nose, you've got it. Meanwhile [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] and myself are caught in the middle by trying to explain the rules and stopping the articles turning into another battle of the Somme. My involvement was initiated when I slapped a CSD notice on an attempt to create a 3rd article [[Drakecircus]] (now a redirect to the shopping centre). During the edit war [[User:Yiwentang|Yiwentang]] was blocked due to retaliatory vandalism, as were several anon IPs from various members of the Student's Union of Plymouth Uni. A couple of the IPs were the aforementioned user's sockpuppets. additionally 4 or 5 articles have had to be protected and still the crap flies. Personally I'd delete both articles as neither have demonstrated notability per se. ---- [[User:WebHamster|<font color="#000000">'''W'''eb'''H'''amste</font><font color="#0000ff">r</font>]] 18:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
524584 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524576 +++$+++ 524582 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.194054120E09 +++$+++ See, I think I know what WebHamster meant when he said the list of shops was a phonebook. He's basically right, though of course there aren't any phone numbers on the list. Basically he meant that it was a list of information of only current value; information that will change from year to year, and only really be of value to people who want to shop there right now. It's a phonebook in the sense that to be current a new issue has to come out every year. Unlike, say, an encyclopedia, which is supposed to contain information that is a bit less sensitive to the passage of time than that. A hundred years from now, no one will care that such and such a book shop was there from 2005 through 2007, unless it was a truly exceptionally notable book shop in its own right. They will care if [[Charles Babbage]] or [[Joshua Reynolds]] did something important there, because those were truly exceptionally notable people. If you have information (hopefully with references) about those, please do say. -- +++$+++ ::: See, I think I know what WebHamster meant when he said the list of shops was a phonebook. He's basically right, though of course there aren't any phone numbers on the list. Basically he meant that it was a list of information of only current value; information that will change from year to year, and only really be of value to people who want to shop there right now. It's a phonebook in the sense that to be current a new issue has to come out every year. Unlike, say, an encyclopedia, which is supposed to contain information that is a bit less sensitive to the passage of time than that. A hundred years from now, no one will care that such and such a book shop was there from 2005 through 2007, unless it was a truly exceptionally notable book shop in its own right. They will care if [[Charles Babbage]] or [[Joshua Reynolds]] did something important there, because those were truly exceptionally notable people. If you have information (hopefully with references) about those, please do say. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

262433 +++$+++ Rocky.liu +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262433 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-09 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.297246080E09 +++$+++ Hi, Dana boomer. We're working on Wiki project this semester. Could you please serve me as my mentor? Thank you very much in advance! +++$+++ Hi, Dana boomer. We're working on Wiki project this semester. Could you please serve me as my mentor? Thank you very much in advance![[User:Rocky.liu|Rocky.liu]] ([[User talk:Rocky.liu|talk]]) 02:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
262434 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262433 +++$+++ 262433 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.297316760E09 +++$+++ Yes, I can serve as your mentor. Please let me know when you have chosen a subject, and in the meantime my talk page is always open if you have questions!  +++$+++ :Yes, I can serve as your mentor. Please let me know when you have chosen a subject, and in the meantime my talk page is always open if you have questions! [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 21:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
262435 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262433 +++$+++ 262433 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.297317000E09 +++$+++ Ah, just checked my e-mail and saw that one of your compatriots has already e-mailed me with your choice of subject. That sounds like a fascinating topic, and one that I will be glad to help on. I will watchlist the page, chip in on discussions\/make suggestions when I see the opportunity, and answer any questions that you all may have.  +++$+++ :Ah, just checked my e-mail and saw that one of your compatriots has already e-mailed me with your choice of subject. That sounds like a fascinating topic, and one that I will be glad to help on. I will watchlist the page, chip in on discussions/make suggestions when I see the opportunity, and answer any questions that you all may have. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 21:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

43739 +++$+++ Dwanyewest +++$+++ Mgoodyear +++$+++ 43739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-28 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.280307960E09 +++$+++ I created this article several years ago I am glad this article has been updated and referenced to an acceptable standard.  +++$+++ I created this article several years ago I am glad this article has been updated and referenced to an acceptable standard. [[User:Dwanyewest|Dwanyewest]] ([[User talk:Dwanyewest|talk]]) 02:06, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
43740 +++$+++ Mgoodyear +++$+++ Mgoodyear +++$+++ 43739 +++$+++ 43739 +++$+++ 2010-07-28 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.280308380E09 +++$+++ That's interesting. Any particular reason? Actually it is a work in progress - it also needed a lot of propaganda removed  +++$+++ : That's interesting. Any particular reason? Actually it is a work in progress - it also needed a lot of propaganda removed [[User:Mgoodyear|Mgoodyear]] ([[User talk:Mgoodyear#top|talk]]) 02:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

262436 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-09 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.297317660E09 +++$+++ GA on hold, just a few points arising.  Regards,  +++$+++ GA on hold, just a few points arising.  Regards, [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 22:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
262437 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262436 +++$+++ 262436 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.297328520E09 +++$+++ I go for the low-hanging fruit at GAN, clearly! Another green dot for your user page.   +++$+++ :I go for the low-hanging fruit at GAN, clearly! Another green dot for your user page.  [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 01:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

293 +++$+++ Sonic99 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-17 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.218970980E09 +++$+++ Blackjays1, why do you change my edit? Most Black Canadians are mixed and I have seen some have lighter skin or natural straight hair. Why can't you accept the truth?  +++$+++ Blackjays1, why do you change my edit? Most Black Canadians are mixed and I have seen some have lighter skin or natural straight hair. Why can't you accept the truth? [[User:Sonic99|Sonic99]] ([[User talk:Sonic99|talk]]) 04:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
294 +++$+++ Sonic99 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 293 +++$+++ 293 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.219050480E09 +++$+++ Ya, you wish that many Canadians identify as blacks even though they may have multi-ethnic ancestries. There are fair-skinned Black Canadians and they're out there, but I think you denied them. Why do I need to provide a link for that? Wikipedia should provide a real information.  +++$+++ : Ya, you wish that many Canadians identify as blacks even though they may have multi-ethnic ancestries. There are fair-skinned Black Canadians and they're out there, but I think you denied them. Why do I need to provide a link for that? Wikipedia should provide a real information. [[User:Sonic99|Sonic99]] ([[User talk:Sonic99|talk]]) 02:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

262438 +++$+++ Miyagawa +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-10 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.297383900E09 +++$+++ Certainly when I did State Dogs, I went into google news and searched the archives for \"official state dog\" which brought up a whole bunch of articles from which I constructed the prose section at the top of the list.  +++$+++ Certainly when I did State Dogs, I went into google news and searched the archives for "official state dog" which brought up a whole bunch of articles from which I constructed the prose section at the top of the list. [[User:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">Miyagawa</font>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">(talk)</font>]] 16:25, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
262439 +++$+++ Miyagawa +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262438 +++$+++ 262438 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.297387560E09 +++$+++ Well one of the comments made on State Dogs was that the prose was actually a little long - so as long as it's cited, you may well have enough already for a FL nom.  +++$+++ :Well one of the comments made on State Dogs was that the prose was actually a little long - so as long as it's cited, you may well have enough already for a FL nom. [[User:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">Miyagawa</font>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">(talk)</font>]] 17:26, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

296 +++$+++ Nagasheus +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 296 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-02 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.220381040E09 +++$+++ Hi, Blackjays! I'm proud to welcome a man with Jamaican ancestry to upcoming [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council\/Proposals#Wikiproject_Reggae|Wikiproject Reggae]]. I made a proposal few days ago, and project needs at least 5 participants to start. If you're interested, fell free to add yourself. Good luck! (= -- +++$+++ Hi, Blackjays! I'm proud to welcome a man with Jamaican ancestry to upcoming [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Wikiproject_Reggae|Wikiproject Reggae]]. I made a proposal few days ago, and project needs at least 5 participants to start. If you're interested, fell free to add yourself. Good luck! (= --[[User:Nagasheus|Nagasheus]] ([[User talk:Nagasheus|talk]]) 11:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
297 +++$+++ Nagasheus +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 296 +++$+++ 296 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.220657580E09 +++$+++ Thank you for participation! (8 Now we can start a work! [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Reggae]]. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for participation! (8 Now we can start a work! [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Reggae]]. --[[User:Nagasheus|Nagasheus]] ([[User talk:Nagasheus|talk]]) 16:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

262442 +++$+++ Rocky.liu +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-14 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.297728300E09 +++$+++ Hi, Dana. In my project assignment there is one item about add the code to the top of your article's talk page. Could you help me to translate that? and how to do that? What is code? article's talk page or my talk page? I'm confusing.  +++$+++ Hi, Dana. In my project assignment there is one item about add the code to the top of your article's talk page. Could you help me to translate that? and how to do that? What is code? article's talk page or my talk page? I'm confusing. [[User:Rocky.liu|Rocky.liu]] ([[User talk:Rocky.liu|talk]]) 16:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
262443 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262442 +++$+++ 262442 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.297729380E09 +++$+++ Hmm, I'm not sure. I'm assuming it's supposed to be a code that you add to the top of the article's talk page that says the article is being worked on as part of the class. However, I can't find anything about the markup on the class page. I've posted a question on the class page, so hopefully we will get an answer soon.  +++$+++ :Hmm, I'm not sure. I'm assuming it's supposed to be a code that you add to the top of the article's talk page that says the article is being worked on as part of the class. However, I can't find anything about the markup on the class page. I've posted a question on the class page, so hopefully we will get an answer soon. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 16:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
262444 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262442 +++$+++ 262443 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.297729980E09 +++$+++ We've received an answer on the course talk page, and I've added the code to the top of your article.  +++$+++ ::We've received an answer on the course talk page, and I've added the code to the top of your article. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 16:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

524590 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-06 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.194419220E09 +++$+++ Oh yes and thanks AnonEMouse If you want to run for arbcom I will gladly nominate you.  :  +++$+++ Oh yes and thanks AnonEMouse If you want to run for arbcom I will gladly nominate you.  : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 23:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
524591 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524590 +++$+++ 524590 +++$+++ 2007-11-07 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.194477240E09 +++$+++ No, thank you. That's a tough job that I don't have enough dedication for. But if you are interested, I can \"endorse\", [[User:Newyorkbrad]] and [[User:Raul654]], who have enough wisdom and dedication for any other twenty people. -- +++$+++ : No, thank you. That's a tough job that I don't have enough dedication for. But if you are interested, I can "endorse", [[User:Newyorkbrad]] and [[User:Raul654]], who have enough wisdom and dedication for any other twenty people. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

262448 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262448 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-14 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.297743360E09 +++$+++ The items in  question  would have their notability  already  asserted in  their own Wikipedia pages -  or is this not  a correct  assumption? How can we resolve this, and how can we adapt our future preparation  of, and reviewing of GAC, if in fact it is necessary?  +++$+++ The items in  question  would have their notability  already  asserted in  their own Wikipedia pages -  or is this not  a correct  assumption? How can we resolve this, and how can we adapt our future preparation  of, and reviewing of GAC, if in fact it is necessary? [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 20:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
262449 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262448 +++$+++ 262448 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.297744140E09 +++$+++ [[WP:BLP]] itself says that: \"All quotations and any material '''challenged or likely to be challenged''' must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline citations|inline citation]]. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced\u2014whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable\u2014should be '''removed immediately and without waiting for discussion'''.\" (Bolding in the original). Because of this, I see nothing wrong with the article retaining GA status with the level of referencing currently in the Notable people section - none of it as far as I can tell is contentious, challenged or likely to be challenged. \"Blindingly obvious\" and \"wholly benign\" go a bit above and beyond the actual policy, IMO. The three places with citation needed tags are probably fine for a GA, but would need to be sourced for FAC, and so could probably use sourcing anyway. And besides this, none of the tags relate to living people. You also may have trouble with the whole section when\/if you go to FAC - they tend to be a bit less forgiving of lists and some reviewers may see it as trivia. I can see the points on both sides of this last argument, and am not telling you it has to be changed or people will laugh you out of the building, but just pointing out something to think about. Hope this helps.  +++$+++ :[[WP:BLP]] itself says that: "All quotations and any material '''challenged or likely to be challenged''' must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline citations|inline citation]]. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be '''removed immediately and without waiting for discussion'''." (Bolding in the original). Because of this, I see nothing wrong with the article retaining GA status with the level of referencing currently in the Notable people section - none of it as far as I can tell is contentious, challenged or likely to be challenged. "Blindingly obvious" and "wholly benign" go a bit above and beyond the actual policy, IMO. The three places with citation needed tags are probably fine for a GA, but would need to be sourced for FAC, and so could probably use sourcing anyway. And besides this, none of the tags relate to living people. You also may have trouble with the whole section when/if you go to FAC - they tend to be a bit less forgiving of lists and some reviewers may see it as trivia. I can see the points on both sides of this last argument, and am not telling you it has to be changed or people will laugh you out of the building, but just pointing out something to think about. Hope this helps. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 20:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
262450 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262448 +++$+++ 262449 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.297744980E09 +++$+++ Hmm... I  understand BLP  policy  only  too  well -  I  helped craft  some of it. That's why  I  was surprised at  this adamant 'bindingly obvious' comment made [[User talk:WhatamIdoing#Talkback 2|here]] with  the aspertion  that  the GA may have been incorrectly awarded. There is also  an admin  who  seems to  support those strange policy  claims  too. I  don't  think there is any  danger of ''me'' (or you  for that  matter) being  larfed out  of the building  ;) -- +++$+++ ::Hmm... I  understand BLP  policy  only  too  well -  I  helped craft  some of it. That's why  I  was surprised at  this adamant 'bindingly obvious' comment made [[User talk:WhatamIdoing#Talkback 2|here]] with  the aspertion  that  the GA may have been incorrectly awarded. There is also  an admin  who  seems to  support those strange policy  claims  too. I  don't  think there is any  danger of ''me'' (or you  for that  matter) being  larfed out  of the building  ;) --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 20:43, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

524593 +++$+++ Yamla +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-06 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.194397080E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your excellent work improving references in articles.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your excellent work improving references in articles. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] 16:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
524594 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524593 +++$+++ 524593 +++$+++ 2007-11-06 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.194397200E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much! -- +++$+++ : Thank you very much! --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

262452 +++$+++ TaerkastUA +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-17 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.298003760E09 +++$+++ I think [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Devil May Cry 2\/archive1|the FAR]] may need to be relisted, as there hasn't been any work done on the article for over a month now.--'' +++$+++ I think [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Devil May Cry 2/archive1|the FAR]] may need to be relisted, as there hasn't been any work done on the article for over a month now.--''[[User:TaerkastUA|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Tærkast'''</span>]]'' ([[User talk:TaerkastUA|<span style="color:maroon">'''Communicate</span>]]''') 20:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
262453 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262452 +++$+++ 262452 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.298076960E09 +++$+++ Thank you for reminding me - I had honestly forgotten about the review. I've reopened it now.  +++$+++ :Thank you for reminding me - I had honestly forgotten about the review. I've reopened it now. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 16:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

524598 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524598 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.194503520E09 +++$+++ Hi, Anon. Do you have any idea what's up with the [[Erika Nagai]] article? It appears to have been deleted, recreated and speedied and salted, without any sort of discussion. As far as the Japanese adult actress articles go, this one wasn't the best of the set, certainly, and I'm not saying for sure that I would even vote \"Keep\" at an AfD. But the subject certainly seems to me to be notable enough to at least go through an AfD...  +++$+++ Hi, Anon. Do you have any idea what's up with the [[Erika Nagai]] article? It appears to have been deleted, recreated and speedied and salted, without any sort of discussion. As far as the Japanese adult actress articles go, this one wasn't the best of the set, certainly, and I'm not saying for sure that I would even vote "Keep" at an AfD. But the subject certainly seems to me to be notable enough to at least go through an AfD... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
524599 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524598 +++$+++ 524598 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.194558420E09 +++$+++ I think the deleters had a point. If you can find a couple of real sources, you can rewrite, but I don't think very much from the deleted version will help. -- +++$+++ : I think the deleters had a point. If you can find a couple of real sources, you can rewrite, but I don't think very much from the deleted version will help. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
524600 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524598 +++$+++ 524599 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.194569760E09 +++$+++ I don't think I ever worked on the article. And, sure, I'd seen the article as a big problem in the category for quite a while, and had planned to try to work on it. The point, I think, is not whether the article was good-- it clearly wasn't-- but whether Erika Nagai is notable enough for an article. I've heard of her, I know of videos she's been in... My point is that there was never any discussion behind any of these deletions. True, the article may very well fail at AfD, so the result will probably be the same. But at least an appearance of respect for consensus over unilateral decision-making might be upheld. Isn't that what we're supposed to do here?  +++$+++ :: I don't think I ever worked on the article. And, sure, I'd seen the article as a big problem in the category for quite a while, and had planned to try to work on it. The point, I think, is not whether the article was good-- it clearly wasn't-- but whether Erika Nagai is notable enough for an article. I've heard of her, I know of videos she's been in... My point is that there was never any discussion behind any of these deletions. True, the article may very well fail at AfD, so the result will probably be the same. But at least an appearance of respect for consensus over unilateral decision-making might be upheld. Isn't that what we're supposed to do here? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
524601 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524598 +++$+++ 524600 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.194570300E09 +++$+++ And, come to think of it, I don't recall any sort of \"Notability\" \"Sourcing\" or other sort of tagging at the article... (My memory could be faulty here though, since it's been a couple months at least since I looked at the article).  +++$+++ ::: And, come to think of it, I don't recall any sort of "Notability" "Sourcing" or other sort of tagging at the article... (My memory could be faulty here though, since it's been a couple months at least since I looked at the article). [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 17:05, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
524602 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524598 +++$+++ 524601 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.194570660E09 +++$+++ Eh. Six of one, half a dozen of the other. I guess they could have deleted three quarters of the article for for WP:BLP issues due being speculative and\/or derogatory and\/or unsourced, then nominated the small stub that was left at WP:AFD, at which point it would have been deleted 5 days later ... but then [[Wp:not#Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy]]: \"rules are not the purpose of the community\"; \"Follow the spirit, not the letter, of any rules, policies and guidelines if you feel they conflict.\". I would probably not have speedied it for reasons similar to yours, but I'm a bit softer on such things than others. I can't fault them; or at least I'm not going to. It's a procedural error at most, and not a very large one. In the end, the question is \"should the Wikipedia have an article on Erika Nagai?\" If we can't make a good case that we should, I don't think it's worth raising a big fuss about the fact that we don't. -- +++$+++ :::: Eh. Six of one, half a dozen of the other. I guess they could have deleted three quarters of the article for for WP:BLP issues due being speculative and/or derogatory and/or unsourced, then nominated the small stub that was left at WP:AFD, at which point it would have been deleted 5 days later ... but then [[Wp:not#Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy]]: "rules are not the purpose of the community"; "Follow the spirit, not the letter, of any rules, policies and guidelines if you feel they conflict.". I would probably not have speedied it for reasons similar to yours, but I'm a bit softer on such things than others. I can't fault them; or at least I'm not going to. It's a procedural error at most, and not a very large one. In the end, the question is "should the Wikipedia have an article on Erika Nagai?" If we can't make a good case that we should, I don't think it's worth raising a big fuss about the fact that we don't. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
524603 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524598 +++$+++ 524602 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.194571260E09 +++$+++ Well yes, the question is \"should the Wikipedia have an article on Erika Nagai?\" And nobody asked the question, and yet that question was answered in the negative, permanently-- the article deleted and salted-- with no attempt at discussion... A bit more than a procedural error, I feel. Erika Nagai was basically banned from Wiki without input from editors who may have had information and sourcing... I don't have such sourcing on her, but I'd hate to think that a subject on which I ''do'' have information and sourcing would be deleted and salted without discussion before I could get to it.  +++$+++ ::::: Well yes, the question is "should the Wikipedia have an article on Erika Nagai?" And nobody asked the question, and yet that question was answered in the negative, permanently-- the article deleted and salted-- with no attempt at discussion... A bit more than a procedural error, I feel. Erika Nagai was basically banned from Wiki without input from editors who may have had information and sourcing... I don't have such sourcing on her, but I'd hate to think that a subject on which I ''do'' have information and sourcing would be deleted and salted without discussion before I could get to it. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 17:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
524604 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524598 +++$+++ 524603 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.194571620E09 +++$+++ Nothing is permanent around here; I can unsalt it much the same way I can restore it, and if I weren't around you could go to [[User:Tabercil]] or [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.]] or any one of 1200 other [[Wikipedia:Administrator]]s. Everything is a temporary measure here because the real world changes. If Erika Nagai makes a record breaking film or assassinates the Pope, you will bet the article will be restored quite quickly. Or, rather, in this case, possibly rewritten from scratch, since there wasn't that much useful stuff there, honest. -- +++$+++ :::::: Nothing is permanent around here; I can unsalt it much the same way I can restore it, and if I weren't around you could go to [[User:Tabercil]] or [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.]] or any one of 1200 other [[Wikipedia:Administrator]]s. Everything is a temporary measure here because the real world changes. If Erika Nagai makes a record breaking film or assassinates the Pope, you will bet the article will be restored quite quickly. Or, rather, in this case, possibly rewritten from scratch, since there wasn't that much useful stuff there, honest. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
524605 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524598 +++$+++ 524604 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.194572520E09 +++$+++ OK-- thanks again, Anon. This one was really not a big deal, as I can see all the valid reasons the article, as it stood, was removed. But someone might have been able to improve it... I really don't think the \"Wikipedia is not a Bureacracy\" note applies here either, since that implies endless discussion without getting anything done. AfD is not a long, drawn-out pointless process. It goes over 5 days and allows those interested, or who may have sourcing on the article, to make some valuable input. Five days is not an unbearably long time to mull over an article deletion, and, in this case, it could have saved the whole recreation\/re-deletion\/recreation\/salting drama that I apparently missed while on break. I guess the thing is that I wish there were more Admins like you who look at the position as a carrier of a mop rather than wielder of a sledgehammer. Thanks as always.  +++$+++ ::::::: OK-- thanks again, Anon. This one was really not a big deal, as I can see all the valid reasons the article, as it stood, was removed. But someone might have been able to improve it... I really don't think the "Wikipedia is not a Bureacracy" note applies here either, since that implies endless discussion without getting anything done. AfD is not a long, drawn-out pointless process. It goes over 5 days and allows those interested, or who may have sourcing on the article, to make some valuable input. Five days is not an unbearably long time to mull over an article deletion, and, in this case, it could have saved the whole recreation/re-deletion/recreation/salting drama that I apparently missed while on break. I guess the thing is that I wish there were more Admins like you who look at the position as a carrier of a mop rather than wielder of a sledgehammer. Thanks as always. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 17:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
524606 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524598 +++$+++ 524604 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.194573540E09 +++$+++ P.S.-- As far as Ms. Nagai is concerned, I think the Pope had better guard himself more from [[Tamakeri]] than guns...  +++$+++ ::::::: P.S.-- As far as Ms. Nagai is concerned, I think the Pope had better guard himself more from [[Tamakeri]] than guns... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 17:59, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

262455 +++$+++ DsgnWrte +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262455 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-21 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.298353560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:DsgnWrte|DsgnWrte]] ([[User talk:DsgnWrte|talk]]) 21:46, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
262456 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262455 +++$+++ 262455 +++$+++ 2011-02-25 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.298627220E09 +++$+++ Hi DsgnWrte - Sorry for the slow response. I am currently on vacation and will be home on Saturday. I took a quick look at the article and it looks like you're basically doing a good job. To quickly answer a couple of your questions - references should be inline, not on a seperate page. Sources that you're citing should be footnoted inline, although if you're using multiple pages from one reference (say a book or a long journal article) in different areas you can use a short format inline and give the full reference information in a seperate section. See [[Cleveland Bay]] for an example of the short\/long formatting that I'm talking about - completely different subject, but same general idea. I'll have to take a look at the move history to answer your question on the move, and will do that when I get home. I hope this helps, and again, sorry for the delay - I hope it hasn't impeded your progress in class. More later,  +++$+++ :Hi DsgnWrte - Sorry for the slow response. I am currently on vacation and will be home on Saturday. I took a quick look at the article and it looks like you're basically doing a good job. To quickly answer a couple of your questions - references should be inline, not on a seperate page. Sources that you're citing should be footnoted inline, although if you're using multiple pages from one reference (say a book or a long journal article) in different areas you can use a short format inline and give the full reference information in a seperate section. See [[Cleveland Bay]] for an example of the short/long formatting that I'm talking about - completely different subject, but same general idea. I'll have to take a look at the move history to answer your question on the move, and will do that when I get home. I hope this helps, and again, sorry for the delay - I hope it hasn't impeded your progress in class. More later, [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 01:47, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

262196 +++$+++ Smallman12q +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-27 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.288167360E09 +++$+++ Could you userfy for me [[Alaska Airlines Flight 536]]. Thanks! +++$+++ Could you userfy for me [[Alaska Airlines Flight 536]]. Thanks![[User:Smallman12q|Smallman12q]] ([[User talk:Smallman12q|talk]]) 01:16, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
262197 +++$+++ Smallman12q +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262196 +++$+++ 262196 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.288246920E09 +++$+++ Not sure if you saw...but Svick's made some progress and a sample posting at http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~svick\/articles.txt. See [[User_talk:Smallman12q#WolterBot_replacement]]. +++$+++ :Not sure if you saw...but Svick's made some progress and a sample posting at http://toolserver.org/~svick/articles.txt. See [[User_talk:Smallman12q#WolterBot_replacement]].[[User:Smallman12q|Smallman12q]] ([[User talk:Smallman12q|talk]]) 23:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
262198 +++$+++ Smallman12q +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262196 +++$+++ 262197 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.289088720E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know that the program is pretty much done, just working out some bugs with non-conforming wikiprojects. You can see the index at http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~svick\/CleanupListing\/Index.php . +++$+++ ::Just wanted to let you know that the program is pretty much done, just working out some bugs with non-conforming wikiprojects. You can see the index at http://toolserver.org/~svick/CleanupListing/Index.php .[[User:Smallman12q|Smallman12q]] ([[User talk:Smallman12q|talk]]) 17:12, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

262461 +++$+++ Smallman12q +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-28 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.298947920E09 +++$+++ Thanks for re-opening the FAR on [[Cryptography]]...most admins would forget=P. +++$+++ Thanks for re-opening the FAR on [[Cryptography]]...most admins would forget=P.[[User:Smallman12q|Smallman12q]] ([[User talk:Smallman12q|talk]]) 18:52, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
262462 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262461 +++$+++ 262461 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.298948100E09 +++$+++ It took me a while (the talk page notification normally only delays the review for a week or two), but I eventually remembered :)  +++$+++ :It took me a while (the talk page notification normally only delays the review for a week or two), but I eventually remembered :) [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 18:55, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

319 +++$+++ TheJazzDalek +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 319 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-02 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.265100480E09 +++$+++ Regarding your recent [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Kardinal_Offishall&curid=24698133&diff=341354530&oldid=341104446 reversion] of my edit to [[Template:Kardinal Offishall]]\u2014navboxes are only supposed to include links to existing articles. In the case of musicians, that means that you don't list every album and single, only the ones that have their own articles. For an example of recent consensus regarding this issue, see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music\/MUSTARD\/Archive 5#Bottom of page box: Contents|this discussion]]. Please revert back to my version so that the navbox meets Wikipedia standards.  +++$+++ Regarding your recent [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Kardinal_Offishall&curid=24698133&diff=341354530&oldid=341104446 reversion] of my edit to [[Template:Kardinal Offishall]]—navboxes are only supposed to include links to existing articles. In the case of musicians, that means that you don't list every album and single, only the ones that have their own articles. For an example of recent consensus regarding this issue, see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD/Archive 5#Bottom of page box: Contents|this discussion]]. Please revert back to my version so that the navbox meets Wikipedia standards. [[User:TheJazzDalek|TheJazzDalek]] ([[User talk:TheJazzDalek|talk]]) 00:48, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
320 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 319 +++$+++ 319 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.265103060E09 +++$+++ I refuse to revert it. If that's the case, why do the navboxes of notable artists such as [[Busta Rhymes]] and [[T.I.]] include singles that don't have their own articles? Personally, I don't think it makes sense to not include the lesser-known singles. For an artist like Kardinal Offishall, not every single he puts out is a chart-topper, but it's misleading if only the linked singles are in the box. It's misleading because he didn't put out ''only'' 12 singles in 13 years, which is what your edit suggests.  +++$+++ :I refuse to revert it. If that's the case, why do the navboxes of notable artists such as [[Busta Rhymes]] and [[T.I.]] include singles that don't have their own articles? Personally, I don't think it makes sense to not include the lesser-known singles. For an artist like Kardinal Offishall, not every single he puts out is a chart-topper, but it's misleading if only the linked singles are in the box. It's misleading because he didn't put out ''only'' 12 singles in 13 years, which is what your edit suggests. [[User:Blackjays1|Blackjays1]] ([[User talk:Blackjays1|talk]]) 01:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
321 +++$+++ TheJazzDalek +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 319 +++$+++ 320 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.265133600E09 +++$+++ Did you even read the link I gave you? Here's another one: [[WP:NAVBOX]]. That box is not for compiling information like a discography, that's what [[Kardinal Offishall discography]] is for. The overwhelming consensus at [[WP:MUSTARD]] is that it's for links only. Just because some other navboxes are incorrectly used doesn't change that.  +++$+++ :: Did you even read the link I gave you? Here's another one: [[WP:NAVBOX]]. That box is not for compiling information like a discography, that's what [[Kardinal Offishall discography]] is for. The overwhelming consensus at [[WP:MUSTARD]] is that it's for links only. Just because some other navboxes are incorrectly used doesn't change that. [[User:TheJazzDalek|TheJazzDalek]] ([[User talk:TheJazzDalek|talk]]) 10:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
322 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 319 +++$+++ 321 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.265168220E09 +++$+++ I understand and accept it, though I still disagree with doing it that way. Nice talk. I take it you're a [[jazz rap]] lover like me?  +++$+++ ::: I understand and accept it, though I still disagree with doing it that way. Nice talk. I take it you're a [[jazz rap]] lover like me? [[User:Blackjays1|Blackjays1]] ([[User talk:Blackjays1|talk]]) 19:37, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
323 +++$+++ TheJazzDalek +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 319 +++$+++ 322 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.265182500E09 +++$+++ That's cool, Wikipedia's like that, you'll do things a certain way until one day you find out that it's supposed to be done differently, or else the rules changed but you didn't hear about it. Part of the problem with the musician navboxes is that so many people do it the wrong way that if someone saw one done correctly it could be misleading. I agree that it could be more clear, and I'm trying to think of a good (yet unobtrusive) way to indicate inside the navbox that it's not a complete list. While I do like jazz rap, I can't say I'm more a fan of that than other rap; I'm not a massive rap fan but what I like is kind of all over the place. Actually, that's a fair description of most music I like, it's all over the place. Anyway, thanks for understanding\u2014I don't enjoy butting heads with people on here, though it does appear to be an occupational hazard. Peace,  +++$+++ :::: That's cool, Wikipedia's like that, you'll do things a certain way until one day you find out that it's supposed to be done differently, or else the rules changed but you didn't hear about it. Part of the problem with the musician navboxes is that so many people do it the wrong way that if someone saw one done correctly it could be misleading. I agree that it could be more clear, and I'm trying to think of a good (yet unobtrusive) way to indicate inside the navbox that it's not a complete list. While I do like jazz rap, I can't say I'm more a fan of that than other rap; I'm not a massive rap fan but what I like is kind of all over the place. Actually, that's a fair description of most music I like, it's all over the place. Anyway, thanks for understanding—I don't enjoy butting heads with people on here, though it does appear to be an occupational hazard. Peace, [[User:TheJazzDalek|TheJazzDalek]] ([[User talk:TheJazzDalek|talk]]) 23:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

262465 +++$+++ 67.101.7.21 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262465 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-10 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.299811080E09 +++$+++ In December 2010, at [[Talk:Free_will#Work_needed]] you wrote \"Cleanup work needs to be completed on this article, or a featured article review may be in order\"; as far as I can tell, there's been no progress on the issue, though other substantive issues have been discussed.  As an IP, I'm not well situated to lead such a review or even assess if its time, but perhaps you could take another look.  See [[Talk:Free_will#Cleanup needed due to excess information (since September 2010)]] for additional comments from me.  Thanks. [[Special:Contributions\/67.101.7.21|67.101.7.21]] ( +++$+++ In December 2010, at [[Talk:Free_will#Work_needed]] you wrote "Cleanup work needs to be completed on this article, or a featured article review may be in order"; as far as I can tell, there's been no progress on the issue, though other substantive issues have been discussed.  As an IP, I'm not well situated to lead such a review or even assess if its time, but perhaps you could take another look.  See [[Talk:Free_will#Cleanup needed due to excess information (since September 2010)]] for additional comments from me.  Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/67.101.7.21|67.101.7.21]] ([[User talk:67.101.7.21|talk]]) 18:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
262466 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262465 +++$+++ 262465 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.299819840E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the note. I will check back in on the article shortly, and if it looks like it still needs a FAR, then I will put it up for review. It looks like some editors are interested in working on the article, though, so that may not be needed.  +++$+++ :Thank you for the note. I will check back in on the article shortly, and if it looks like it still needs a FAR, then I will put it up for review. It looks like some editors are interested in working on the article, though, so that may not be needed. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 21:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

262467 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-11 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.299895860E09 +++$+++ Wonder why NONE of us were alerted that TB was going to go on the main page, most lead editors usually are notified, correct?  That one toolserver gadget shows the lead editors are clearly Ealdgyth, you, me and CG.  I'm mildly frustrated that we weren't alerted.  Thoughts on why that happened?   +++$+++ Wonder why NONE of us were alerted that TB was going to go on the main page, most lead editors usually are notified, correct?  That one toolserver gadget shows the lead editors are clearly Ealdgyth, you, me and CG.  I'm mildly frustrated that we weren't alerted.  Thoughts on why that happened?  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 18:11, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
262468 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262467 +++$+++ 262467 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.299896100E09 +++$+++ Nobody cares? Nobody owns an article? The general lack of respect given to article writers? All of the above?  +++$+++ :Nobody cares? Nobody owns an article? The general lack of respect given to article writers? All of the above? [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 18:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
262469 +++$+++ Raul654 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262467 +++$+++ 262467 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.299899040E09 +++$+++ I think I can explain it - Cas Liber requested the article go on the main page  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article\/requests&diff=417778812&oldid=417738245] (in the non-specific date category - e.g, any date would be fine). Shortly thereafter, I scheduled it for the next available slot [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article\/March_10,_2011&diff=417797046&oldid=404817704], which was 36 hours later. [[user:Tbhotch]] manually notifies contributors when their articles go on the main page, but he was away March 9.  +++$+++ :I think I can explain it - Cas Liber requested the article go on the main page  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article/requests&diff=417778812&oldid=417738245] (in the non-specific date category - e.g, any date would be fine). Shortly thereafter, I scheduled it for the next available slot [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article/March_10,_2011&diff=417797046&oldid=404817704], which was 36 hours later. [[user:Tbhotch]] manually notifies contributors when their articles go on the main page, but he was away March 9. [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654|talk]]) 19:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
262470 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262467 +++$+++ 262469 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.299899400E09 +++$+++ That kind of courtesy ought not to depend on the availability of a single editor.  +++$+++ ::That kind of courtesy ought not to depend on the availability of a single editor. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 19:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
262471 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262467 +++$+++ 262470 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.300015560E09 +++$+++ I think I'm over it, but given that we had a heads up about some problematic statements in the lead and such, it sure would have been nice to have had the heads up.  Oh well, at least it got there!   +++$+++ :::I think I'm over it, but given that we had a heads up about some problematic statements in the lead and such, it sure would have been nice to have had the heads up.  Oh well, at least it got there!  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 04:26, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

327 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 327 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-28 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.275084900E09 +++$+++ Worst case scenario, if we can't figure anything else out then I'll ask you to create the article on a sandbox page and then I'll try to use some administrator magic to move it to the proper title. Thanks.  +++$+++ Worst case scenario, if we can't figure anything else out then I'll ask you to create the article on a sandbox page and then I'll try to use some administrator magic to move it to the proper title. Thanks. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 15:15, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
328 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 327 +++$+++ 327 +++$+++ 2010-05-28 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.275097260E09 +++$+++ Even though we can override the block itself, admins are still supposed to be able to see the pink warning boxes so that we know ''why'' the page is blocked \u2014 but for some reason I see nothing at all. Hmmmmmm. I'll keep looking into this, but yeah, if you get a sandbox version done before I have another answer for you, then let me know and I'll move it into articlespace for you. Thanks for the heads-up.  +++$+++ : Even though we can override the block itself, admins are still supposed to be able to see the pink warning boxes so that we know ''why'' the page is blocked — but for some reason I see nothing at all. Hmmmmmm. I'll keep looking into this, but yeah, if you get a sandbox version done before I have another answer for you, then let me know and I'll move it into articlespace for you. Thanks for the heads-up. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 18:41, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
329 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 327 +++$+++ 327 +++$+++ 2010-05-28 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.275098520E09 +++$+++ Progress! I just tried logging out so that I was looking at the page as an IP number instead of as an administrator, and finally saw the warning box, so I have a better idea of what's going on now. I think the problem is most likely the ?!! at the end, as one of the blacklist rules is \"excessive punctuation\"; I can't find any other rule that the title might be violating or any indication that the title itself has been directly blocked. (And if it's just a generic text string accidentally matching something on the exclusion list, that would explain why I wasn't seeing the warning earlier, too.) So instead of going through the whole sandbox rigamarole, try creating it at the unpunctuated [[Naaah, Dis Kid Can't Be from Canada]] instead, and then I'll move ''that'' afterward. Sound like a plan?  +++$+++ : Progress! I just tried logging out so that I was looking at the page as an IP number instead of as an administrator, and finally saw the warning box, so I have a better idea of what's going on now. I think the problem is most likely the ?!! at the end, as one of the blacklist rules is "excessive punctuation"; I can't find any other rule that the title might be violating or any indication that the title itself has been directly blocked. (And if it's just a generic text string accidentally matching something on the exclusion list, that would explain why I wasn't seeing the warning earlier, too.) So instead of going through the whole sandbox rigamarole, try creating it at the unpunctuated [[Naaah, Dis Kid Can't Be from Canada]] instead, and then I'll move ''that'' afterward. Sound like a plan? [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 19:02, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
330 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 327 +++$+++ 329 +++$+++ 2010-05-31 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.275351660E09 +++$+++ Moved. I love it when a brilliant idea works out! (*grin*)  +++$+++ ::Moved. I love it when a brilliant idea works out! (*grin*) [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 17:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

262472 +++$+++ Steven Walling +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262472 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-14 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.300165320E09 +++$+++ Hey, I think there's a few things about their work with some specific breeds that may be missing, so if we're going for FA-level comprehensiveness then I'll try to poke around and see what I can find. Otherwise it's looking great, so let me know if\/when you take it FAC and I'll be happy to chime in! <font style=\"font-family: Georgia\"> +++$+++ Hey, I think there's a few things about their work with some specific breeds that may be missing, so if we're going for FA-level comprehensiveness then I'll try to poke around and see what I can find. Otherwise it's looking great, so let me know if/when you take it FAC and I'll be happy to chime in! <font style="font-family: Georgia">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]</font> 22:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
262473 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262472 +++$+++ 262472 +++$+++ 2011-03-14 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.300165500E09 +++$+++ If you can find more info on work with specific breeds, that would be great - especially rabbits!! I've done quite a bit of digging, and what I found is in the article. One thing to keep in mind is that we're really supposed to keep citations to the organization itself to a minimum - I've been using 30% as a general landmark, although this is just my personal feeling. The more references we can get to outside organizations, especially for their specific breed work, the better. I plan to put it up for PR in the next few days, but it'll probably be at least a couple of weeks before it goes to FAC. Thanks in advance for anything you can find,  +++$+++ :If you can find more info on work with specific breeds, that would be great - especially rabbits!! I've done quite a bit of digging, and what I found is in the article. One thing to keep in mind is that we're really supposed to keep citations to the organization itself to a minimum - I've been using 30% as a general landmark, although this is just my personal feeling. The more references we can get to outside organizations, especially for their specific breed work, the better. I plan to put it up for PR in the next few days, but it'll probably be at least a couple of weeks before it goes to FAC. Thanks in advance for anything you can find, [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
262474 +++$+++ Steven Walling +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262472 +++$+++ 262473 +++$+++ 2011-03-14 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.300166220E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that whole minimum of self-referenced material issue is limiting when it comes to talking about their specific conservation work, but thanks for the reminder. <font style=\"font-family: Georgia\"> +++$+++ ::Yeah, that whole minimum of self-referenced material issue is limiting when it comes to talking about their specific conservation work, but thanks for the reminder. <font style="font-family: Georgia">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]</font> 22:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
262475 +++$+++ Steven Walling +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262472 +++$+++ 262473 +++$+++ 2011-03-15 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.300185120E09 +++$+++ I added cites to two other good breeds books I own, as well as a few other edits. If you need any breed-specific info, let me know I might be able to help with those couple sources. <font style=\"font-family: Georgia\"> +++$+++ ::I added cites to two other good breeds books I own, as well as a few other edits. If you need any breed-specific info, let me know I might be able to help with those couple sources. <font style="font-family: Georgia">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]</font> 03:32, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
262476 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262472 +++$+++ 262475 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.300273860E09 +++$+++ I'm not going to be a lot of help here, but if you are hunting for outside sources, I DO happen to have the entire collection of [[The Mother Earth News]] on CD-ROM, dating back to the first issue, so if you need something specific that's indexed online but not available in full text, I may have it.  (Or to be precise, my spouse has the CD-ROMs, if we want to get technical...) I know \"Mother\" does a lot of articles on conservation agriculture in general and some articles on cool rare breeds.    +++$+++ :::I'm not going to be a lot of help here, but if you are hunting for outside sources, I DO happen to have the entire collection of [[The Mother Earth News]] on CD-ROM, dating back to the first issue, so if you need something specific that's indexed online but not available in full text, I may have it.  (Or to be precise, my spouse has the CD-ROMs, if we want to get technical...) I know "Mother" does a lot of articles on conservation agriculture in general and some articles on cool rare breeds.   [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 04:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
262477 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262472 +++$+++ 262476 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.300311540E09 +++$+++ Steven, thank you very much for the additional sources. Basically, any of the currently ALBC-cited information that can be moved to other sources would be fantastic, as would any information about breed-saving-programs that is not already in the article. Montana, all of the articles in MEN that I've found regarding the ALBC I've been able to access the full-text version of. However, there may have been some I missed. I can't seem to find a complete online index - does your CD have one? If so, and if there's anything I've missed (see the article, there's already a few cites from MEN there), I'd be very happy to see it. Thanks to both of you,  +++$+++ ::::Steven, thank you very much for the additional sources. Basically, any of the currently ALBC-cited information that can be moved to other sources would be fantastic, as would any information about breed-saving-programs that is not already in the article. Montana, all of the articles in MEN that I've found regarding the ALBC I've been able to access the full-text version of. However, there may have been some I missed. I can't seem to find a complete online index - does your CD have one? If so, and if there's anything I've missed (see the article, there's already a few cites from MEN there), I'd be very happy to see it. Thanks to both of you, [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 14:39, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
262478 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262472 +++$+++ 262477 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.300332540E09 +++$+++ I'll see what sort of indexing it has.   +++$+++ :::::I'll see what sort of indexing it has.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 20:29, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

611724 +++$+++ AndonicO +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.165434780E09 +++$+++ Hi Sasuke-kun27! Thanks for signing my autograph book, I appreciate it. :-) | [[User:AndonicO|<font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\">'''A'''<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"DarkSlateGray\">ndonic<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"2\">'''O'''<\/font>]] <small><sup><font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"Tan\">[[User talk:AndonicO|''Talk'']]<\/font> | <font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"Tan\"> +++$+++ Hi Sasuke-kun27! Thanks for signing my autograph book, I appreciate it. :-) | [[User:AndonicO|<font face="Papyrus" color="Black">'''A'''</font><font face="Papyrus" color="DarkSlateGray">ndonic</font><font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="2">'''O'''</font>]] <small><sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="Tan">[[User talk:AndonicO|''Talk'']]</font> | <font face="Times New Roman" color="Tan">[[User:AndonicO/My Autograph Book|''Sign Here'']]</font></sup></small> 11:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
611725 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611724 +++$+++ 611724 +++$+++ 2006-12-09 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.165711500E09 +++$+++ No problem. I really like the autograph book idea. I'd make my own but I think I have enough sub-pages already ;) \/\/  +++$+++ :No problem. I really like the autograph book idea. I'd make my own but I think I have enough sub-pages already ;) // [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuke'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sasuke-kun27|<font color="purple">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 16:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

453921 +++$+++ 66.245.126.161 +++$+++ Benc +++$+++ 453921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-10-09 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.097363400E09 +++$+++ How could you revert your OWN edits?? Generally, edits of this kind usually mismatch Z and X in \"reverted edits by X to last version by Y\", but they match in this section.  +++$+++ How could you revert your OWN edits?? Generally, edits of this kind usually mismatch Z and X in "reverted edits by X to last version by Y", but they match in this section. [[User:66.245.126.161|66.245.126.161]] 16:10, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
453922 +++$+++ Benc +++$+++ Benc +++$+++ 453921 +++$+++ 453921 +++$+++ 2004-10-09 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.097368200E09 +++$+++ I'm entitled to change my mind. Who isn't? :-)  +++$+++ :I'm entitled to change my mind. Who isn't? :-) [[User:Benc|&bull;&nbsp;Benc]][[User_talk:Benc|&nbsp;&bull;]] 17:30, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
453923 +++$+++ Benc +++$+++ Benc +++$+++ 453921 +++$+++ 453922 +++$+++ 2004-10-09 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.097368440E09 +++$+++ Or perhaps I have an evil twin? :-P  +++$+++ ::Or perhaps I have an evil twin? :-P [[User:Benc|&bull;&nbsp;cneB]][[User_talk:Benc|&nbsp;&bull;]] 17:34, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)

336 +++$+++ Moxy +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 336 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-09 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.297268580E09 +++$+++ I see what your interests are here on Wiki. I have a few new Books that i have digitized that can be  used as refs ...perhaps you may also find use for them. I will post this at  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject African diaspora]] may help out the project.......... +++$+++ I see what your interests are here on Wiki. I have a few new Books that i have digitized that can be  used as refs ...perhaps you may also find use for them. I will post this at  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject African diaspora]] may help out the project..........[[User:Moxy|Moxy]] ([[User talk:Moxy|talk]]) 08:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
337 +++$+++ Moxy +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 336 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.297310700E09 +++$+++ if you have time pls jumpin the talk at [[Talk:African diaspora#Overuse of the rarely used black african expression]] +++$+++ :::if you have time pls jumpin the talk at [[Talk:African diaspora#Overuse of the rarely used black african expression]][[User:Moxy|Moxy]] ([[User talk:Moxy|talk]]) 20:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
338 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ Blackjays1 +++$+++ 336 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.297337460E09 +++$+++ Thank you for taking the time to make that list. I will definitely check them out.  +++$+++ ::::Thank you for taking the time to make that list. I will definitely check them out. [[User:Blackjays1|Blackjays1]] ([[User talk:Blackjays1#top|talk]]) 03:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

524625 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-12 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.194914880E09 +++$+++ ...mail.  I hope.  If you can respond to me \"neutrally\" on my talk page then great, otherwise more tomorrow.  Thanks for your time.   +++$+++ ...mail.  I hope.  If you can respond to me "neutrally" on my talk page then great, otherwise more tomorrow.  Thanks for your time.  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] 16:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
524626 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524625 +++$+++ 524625 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.194916320E09 +++$+++ Ding.   +++$+++ :Ding.  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] 17:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
524627 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524625 +++$+++ 524626 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.194969840E09 +++$+++ Double ding.   +++$+++ ::Double ding.  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] 08:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

262482 +++$+++ Woody +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.300423620E09 +++$+++ Hi Dana Boomer, after some work on [[Association football]] following some [[Talk:Association_football#Work needed|talkpage discussion]], the nominator ([[User:Hawkeye7]]) seems content with it. What happens to [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Association football\/archive1]] now? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Dana Boomer, after some work on [[Association football]] following some [[Talk:Association_football#Work needed|talkpage discussion]], the nominator ([[User:Hawkeye7]]) seems content with it. What happens to [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Association football/archive1]] now? Thanks, [[User:Woody|Woody]] ([[User talk:Woody|talk]]) 21:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
262483 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262482 +++$+++ 262482 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.300425060E09 +++$+++ I have deleted it as unnecessary. Thanks for letting me know, and for your work on the article.  +++$+++ :I have deleted it as unnecessary. Thanks for letting me know, and for your work on the article. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
262484 +++$+++ Woody +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262482 +++$+++ 262483 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.300426920E09 +++$+++ No problem, thanks for dealing with it.  +++$+++ ::No problem, thanks for dealing with it. [[User:Woody|Woody]] ([[User talk:Woody|talk]]) 22:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

262485 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-18 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.300499040E09 +++$+++ Hi Dana, now that Ealdgyth is back, shall we take Appaloosa to FA?  (I'm also asking her)  +++$+++ Hi Dana, now that Ealdgyth is back, shall we take Appaloosa to FA?  (I'm also asking her) [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 18:44, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
262486 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262485 +++$+++ 262485 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.300517580E09 +++$+++ Replied on Ealdgyth's page, to keep everything together.  +++$+++ :Replied on Ealdgyth's page, to keep everything together. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 23:53, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

524630 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524630 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-14 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.195092840E09 +++$+++ Yes ? :  +++$+++ Yes ? : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 18:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
524631 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524630 +++$+++ 524630 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.195202460E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I don't know how I missed this question. You mean [[Template:Bluegrassmusic]]? Templates differ - generally you want to be extremely careful with complicated templates, but this seems to be straightforward. [[Template talk:Bluegrassmusic]] also seems to say feel free to edit it, so I'd say go ahead... but I'm not quite sure what you want to do, though, it merely lists [[Banjo]] and we don't really have a separate 5 string Banjo article; you want to change the title of that link to \"5 string Banjo\"? If you think you know what you are doing, though, be bold; at worst someone will complain, and then if you are polite about it, you will be able to come to some compromise. Do take the time to take a look at several articles that use the template immediately after your change, though, and make sure you haven't blown anything up. :-) -- +++$+++ : Sorry, I don't know how I missed this question. You mean [[Template:Bluegrassmusic]]? Templates differ - generally you want to be extremely careful with complicated templates, but this seems to be straightforward. [[Template talk:Bluegrassmusic]] also seems to say feel free to edit it, so I'd say go ahead... but I'm not quite sure what you want to do, though, it merely lists [[Banjo]] and we don't really have a separate 5 string Banjo article; you want to change the title of that link to "5 string Banjo"? If you think you know what you are doing, though, be bold; at worst someone will complain, and then if you are polite about it, you will be able to come to some compromise. Do take the time to take a look at several articles that use the template immediately after your change, though, and make sure you haven't blown anything up. :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 00:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

262487 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262487 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-20 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.300606800E09 +++$+++ I think it looks much better - thanks. Please let me know when it is at FLC,  +++$+++ I think it looks much better - thanks. Please let me know when it is at FLC, [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 00:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
262488 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262487 +++$+++ 262487 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.300608960E09 +++$+++ Awesome, thanks!  +++$+++ :Awesome, thanks! [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 01:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
262489 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262487 +++$+++ 262487 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.300614480E09 +++$+++ Dana, an extremely minor thing, but if you can find a photo of a TB for the list that isn't one of the ones from the Japanese racetrack, that would be maybe a good idea (I can just see some smartass drive-by reviewer asking if they speak Japanese in Kentucky...)  I know that all the good photos are those ones, but I know there is a photo of racing horses at Monmouth Park that was an old lead image for TB waaaay back that at least was taken in the USA. Just a thought, and I'm saying i here, not there, because Ruhrfisch isn't going to tell on us (right??)   +++$+++ :Dana, an extremely minor thing, but if you can find a photo of a TB for the list that isn't one of the ones from the Japanese racetrack, that would be maybe a good idea (I can just see some smartass drive-by reviewer asking if they speak Japanese in Kentucky...)  I know that all the good photos are those ones, but I know there is a photo of racing horses at Monmouth Park that was an old lead image for TB waaaay back that at least was taken in the USA. Just a thought, and I'm saying i here, not there, because Ruhrfisch isn't going to tell on us (right??)  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 02:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

524632 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-16 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.195236480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help. :  +++$+++ Thanks for your help. : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 10:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
524633 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524632 +++$+++ 524632 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.195201860E09 +++$+++ Because we only have the word of an anonymous blogger that the subject confirms it's true. It's not an interview with a reliable source. Luke is quoting the blog post, but he isn't saying \"yes, Sasha confirmed this to me\", he's just saying \"here's what some blogger wrote\"; in fact, even if Luke did, we'd worry, because Luke's status as a reliable source is borderline. He's an expert in the field, but he's just one guy, we generally don't use individuals for sources for highly controversial information that aren't backed up by better sources. For highly controversial items about living persons, we want very good sources. For example, your edit to [[Robin Williams]] was backed by a very good source. -- +++$+++ : Because we only have the word of an anonymous blogger that the subject confirms it's true. It's not an interview with a reliable source. Luke is quoting the blog post, but he isn't saying "yes, Sasha confirmed this to me", he's just saying "here's what some blogger wrote"; in fact, even if Luke did, we'd worry, because Luke's status as a reliable source is borderline. He's an expert in the field, but he's just one guy, we generally don't use individuals for sources for highly controversial information that aren't backed up by better sources. For highly controversial items about living persons, we want very good sources. For example, your edit to [[Robin Williams]] was backed by a very good source. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 00:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

262490 +++$+++ Wilhelmina Will +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-25 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.301041140E09 +++$+++ Greetings, Dana boomer! Just letting you know that I'll be reviewing your GA nomination. Please remember to check up [[Talk:Kathiawari\/GA1|here]] in case I notice anything which needs addressing. Thanks!  +++$+++ Greetings, Dana boomer! Just letting you know that I'll be reviewing your GA nomination. Please remember to check up [[Talk:Kathiawari/GA1|here]] in case I notice anything which needs addressing. Thanks! [[User:Wilhelmina Will|Wilhelmina Will]] ([[User talk:Wilhelmina Will|talk]]) 01:19, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
262491 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262490 +++$+++ 262490 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.301106360E09 +++$+++ Thank you Wilhelmina. I have the review page watchlisted and will keep an eye out there for comments.  +++$+++ :Thank you Wilhelmina. I have the review page watchlisted and will keep an eye out there for comments. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 19:26, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

348 +++$+++ Trilobitealive +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ 348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-20 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.300620960E09 +++$+++ I was inspired by your recent addition of the Eriogonum longifolum flowers to [[Eriogonum longifolium\u200e]] and [[Eriogonum longifolium var. gnaphalifolium]]. So this prompted me to upload a photo I made last summer of the E. Longifolium var. harperi stalk. These are indeed impressive plants, over 6 feet tall! Regards.  +++$+++ I was inspired by your recent addition of the Eriogonum longifolum flowers to [[Eriogonum longifolium‎]] and [[Eriogonum longifolium var. gnaphalifolium]]. So this prompted me to upload a photo I made last summer of the E. Longifolium var. harperi stalk. These are indeed impressive plants, over 6 feet tall! Regards. [[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 04:36, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
349 +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ 348 +++$+++ 348 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.300621320E09 +++$+++ Great! Thanks! - +++$+++ *Great! Thanks! -[[User:IceCreamAntisocial|IceCreamAntisocial]] ([[User talk:IceCreamAntisocial#top|talk]]) 04:42, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

524638 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-16 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.195265880E09 +++$+++ Hi, AnonEMouse. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sora_Aoi&diff=171926198&oldid=171324015 in this edit] an anonymous editor has added an interesting little tidbit to the [[Sora Aoi]] article. It is sourced, reliably, I think with a clip of the group making this statement on a television program. The only problem may be that this clip is at YouTube, which I know is usually frowned upon. I'm tempted to rewrite and reformat a little, but keep it. Or are these evil and un-reliable-sourcing thoughts sent by Satan himself to tempt me over to the Dark Side? --  +++$+++ Hi, AnonEMouse. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sora_Aoi&diff=171926198&oldid=171324015 in this edit] an anonymous editor has added an interesting little tidbit to the [[Sora Aoi]] article. It is sourced, reliably, I think with a clip of the group making this statement on a television program. The only problem may be that this clip is at YouTube, which I know is usually frowned upon. I'm tempted to rewrite and reformat a little, but keep it. Or are these evil and un-reliable-sourcing thoughts sent by Satan himself to tempt me over to the Dark Side? -- [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 18:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
524639 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524638 +++$+++ 524638 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.195267860E09 +++$+++ I don't think it's Satan, but I do think it's [[Phil, the Prince of Insufficient Light]]. I just skimmed it, but I don't see them saying that they used a shot of Sora Aoi, just a naked woman. And, frankly, even if it is Sora Aoi, I don't see either them saying that they picked her for some specific reason, or that she got any fame from it, or they got any special infamy from it. So I don't think it adds that much to the article, and given the sourcing problems (the main problem with YouTube is that it's full of rampant copyright violations, which I strongly suspect this is an example of), I don't think it's worth the hassle. Sorry. -- +++$+++ : I don't think it's Satan, but I do think it's [[Phil, the Prince of Insufficient Light]]. I just skimmed it, but I don't see them saying that they used a shot of Sora Aoi, just a naked woman. And, frankly, even if it is Sora Aoi, I don't see either them saying that they picked her for some specific reason, or that she got any fame from it, or they got any special infamy from it. So I don't think it adds that much to the article, and given the sourcing problems (the main problem with YouTube is that it's full of rampant copyright violations, which I strongly suspect this is an example of), I don't think it's worth the hassle. Sorry. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
524640 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524638 +++$+++ 524639 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.195268400E09 +++$+++ Well, they do name her in the video-- \"Miss Sora Aoi, in Japan\"-- and do say it was used to draw a crowd... Personally, I find it interesting. I guess I'll just take the path of, \"Do nothing, and let someone else remove it...\" Darn you to heck, Phil! --  +++$+++ :: Well, they do name her in the video-- "Miss Sora Aoi, in Japan"-- and do say it was used to draw a crowd... Personally, I find it interesting. I guess I'll just take the path of, "Do nothing, and let someone else remove it..." Darn you to heck, Phil! -- [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 19:00, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
524641 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524638 +++$+++ 524640 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.195270320E09 +++$+++ I didn't see that, but didn't look very hard. Can you see if you can find out and give the name, channel, and date of the TV program? ([[Arirang TV]], I'd guess...) If so, you might be able to cite it as a source even if the YouTube link is removed, similarly to being able to cite a newspaper article for a source even if it's not online. (Stress on the ''might'' however.) -- +++$+++ ::: I didn't see that, but didn't look very hard. Can you see if you can find out and give the name, channel, and date of the TV program? ([[Arirang TV]], I'd guess...) If so, you might be able to cite it as a source even if the YouTube link is removed, similarly to being able to cite a newspaper article for a source even if it's not online. (Stress on the ''might'' however.) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 19:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
524642 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524638 +++$+++ 524641 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.195270740E09 +++$+++ Yes, I was wondering about that also. I'll look into it. Thanks. --  +++$+++ :::: Yes, I was wondering about that also. I'll look into it. Thanks. -- [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 19:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

262495 +++$+++ ThatPeskyCommoner +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-01 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.301661960E09 +++$+++ Montanabw suggested I ask you to look at [[History of the horse in Britain]] if nobody else picked up on it; any chance you could find time for it?  Many thanks :o)  +++$+++ Montanabw suggested I ask you to look at [[History of the horse in Britain]] if nobody else picked up on it; any chance you could find time for it?  Many thanks :o) [[User:ThatPeskyCommoner| <span style="color:#003300; font-family: cursive;">'''Pesky'''</span>]] ([[User talk:ThatPeskyCommoner|<span style="color:#336600;">talk</span>]]) 05:46, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
262496 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262495 +++$+++ 262495 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.301795040E09 +++$+++ Hi Pesky! I don't usually review horse articles, because of the possible COI, since it's an area that I work in often with editors that I collaborate with fairly regularly. There's also the issue that GAN is a good way to get outside opinions from non-horsey people, which is a thing that we often have problems with (they tend to spot jargon and technical language way better than we do!). However, there is a group of very good science and history editors out there that often pick up the horse articles. The article has only been up for a week, which is a fairly short waiting period at GAN (unfortunately, there's a fairly constant backlog there). If it's still there in another week with no sign of review, ping me again and I'll drop notes to a few people.  +++$+++ :Hi Pesky! I don't usually review horse articles, because of the possible COI, since it's an area that I work in often with editors that I collaborate with fairly regularly. There's also the issue that GAN is a good way to get outside opinions from non-horsey people, which is a thing that we often have problems with (they tend to spot jargon and technical language way better than we do!). However, there is a group of very good science and history editors out there that often pick up the horse articles. The article has only been up for a week, which is a fairly short waiting period at GAN (unfortunately, there's a fairly constant backlog there). If it's still there in another week with no sign of review, ping me again and I'll drop notes to a few people. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 18:44, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
262497 +++$+++ ThatPeskyCommoner +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262495 +++$+++ 262496 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.301795460E09 +++$+++ Thank you :o)  +++$+++ ::Thank you :o) [[User:ThatPeskyCommoner| <span style="color:#003300; font-family: cursive;">'''Pesky'''</span>]] ([[User talk:ThatPeskyCommoner|<span style="color:#336600;">talk</span>]]) 18:51, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

532483 +++$+++ Xornok +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-07 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.144458780E09 +++$+++ yeah, the reason none of those pages were made, were because we dont know the official titles of them.... like rescue op is now called 'Company of Thieves'. just fyi, probably not a good idea until we get official word.... rescue op just described the episode, what it was probably gonna be about....but, just fyi, for future reference  +++$+++ yeah, the reason none of those pages were made, were because we dont know the official titles of them.... like rescue op is now called 'Company of Thieves'. just fyi, probably not a good idea until we get official word.... rescue op just described the episode, what it was probably gonna be about....but, just fyi, for future reference [[User:Xornok|Xornok]] 18:13, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
532484 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532483 +++$+++ 532483 +++$+++ 2006-04-07 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.144458960E09 +++$+++ Ok, I will wait with making more in future. Leave the present ones for now, we can remane them later. --[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : Ok, I will wait with making more in future. Leave the present ones for now, we can remane them later. --[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]] 18:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
532485 +++$+++ Xornok +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532483 +++$+++ 532484 +++$+++ 2006-04-07 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.144459260E09 +++$+++ i moved rescue to company, so, dont worry about that  +++$+++ :: i moved rescue to company, so, dont worry about that [[User:Xornok|Xornok]] 18:21, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

262498 +++$+++ Jackhynes +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-03 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.301878080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the [[Talk:Sunda slow loris\/GA1|review of the Sunda slow loris article]], if you have time could you check if there are any outstanding issues with it? Much appreciated,  +++$+++ Thanks for the [[Talk:Sunda slow loris/GA1|review of the Sunda slow loris article]], if you have time could you check if there are any outstanding issues with it? Much appreciated, [[User:Jackhynes|Jack]] ([[User talk:Jackhynes|talk]]) 17:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
262499 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262498 +++$+++ 262498 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.301970240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note. I have responded there.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the note. I have responded there. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 19:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

524643 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-17 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.195291320E09 +++$+++ The lead of her article still needs work, but it turns out that she is still cited as the highest-paid actor in daytime. I was just coming to add a more updated reference to that before you made the ''[[New York Times]]'' reference past tense. I just added a ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' reference as well. How do you feel that should be worded? Her lead definitely can be expanded with other information other than her acclaim.  +++$+++ The lead of her article still needs work, but it turns out that she is still cited as the highest-paid actor in daytime. I was just coming to add a more updated reference to that before you made the ''[[New York Times]]'' reference past tense. I just added a ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' reference as well. How do you feel that should be worded? Her lead definitely can be expanded with other information other than her acclaim. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 01:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
524644 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524643 +++$+++ 524643 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.195291440E09 +++$+++ No problem making it present tense if you have a more recent reference. I was just worried by the 16 year gap. Feel free to expand further. :-) -- +++$+++ : No problem making it present tense if you have a more recent reference. I was just worried by the 16 year gap. Feel free to expand further. :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 01:24, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
524645 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524643 +++$+++ 524644 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.195291740E09 +++$+++ I know what you mean. I was worried about that as well. Now I'm worried that her lead sounds too much like a bragging fan wrote it. And, also, I'm trying to find a better way to reword the mention of ''New York Times'' and ''Los Angeles Times'', since they both have the word \"Times\" in their title. But I'll figure out a better presentation later for her lead.  +++$+++ ::I know what you mean. I was worried about that as well. Now I'm worried that her lead sounds too much like a bragging fan wrote it. And, also, I'm trying to find a better way to reword the mention of ''New York Times'' and ''Los Angeles Times'', since they both have the word "Times" in their title. But I'll figure out a better presentation later for her lead. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 01:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

356 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ 356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 09:01:00 +++$+++ 1.308499260E09 +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes-->  +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 09:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
357 +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ 356 +++$+++ 356 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.308499380E09 +++$+++ lol, no. Go away, bot. - +++$+++ *lol, no. Go away, bot. -[[User:IceCreamAntisocial|IceCreamAntisocial]] ([[User talk:IceCreamAntisocial#top|talk]]) 09:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

524646 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524646 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-17 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.195350480E09 +++$+++ I just got a bunch of photos from her that I'm about to upload (I was pretty shocked to hear from her, as about half the article deals with her legal troubles)...anyway, she's not objecting to the use of her real name (it's well-sourced) but would prefer to be listed as [[Melissa Wolf]]. Wanted to check with you so that I title the photos and Commons gallery the same as the article.  +++$+++ I just got a bunch of photos from her that I'm about to upload (I was pretty shocked to hear from her, as about half the article deals with her legal troubles)...anyway, she's not objecting to the use of her real name (it's well-sourced) but would prefer to be listed as [[Melissa Wolf]]. Wanted to check with you so that I title the photos and Commons gallery the same as the article. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 17:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
524647 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524646 +++$+++ 524646 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.195373400E09 +++$+++ Makes sense, that is her web site, and what she was in Penthouse as. Moved. By the way, her web site is God's gift to writing an article - look at all these sources! [http:\/\/www.melissasmansion.com\/news.html] <small>You ''know'' you've been editing too long when you go to a web site about a nude model, and the thing that really interests you are the sources...<\/small>-- +++$+++ : Makes sense, that is her web site, and what she was in Penthouse as. Moved. By the way, her web site is God's gift to writing an article - look at all these sources! [http://www.melissasmansion.com/news.html] <small>You ''know'' you've been editing too long when you go to a web site about a nude model, and the thing that really interests you are the sources...</small>--[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 00:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
524648 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524646 +++$+++ 524647 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.195374060E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I'll see what I can do for article expansion in the not-too-distant future. In a related issue, I got a MySpace message from [[Sky Lopez]], whose article stated that she was born in Minnesota, stating that she had never even visited the state. My removal got reverted by an admin, but I left a note on his talk page before reverting back and hopefully the issue is resolved.  +++$+++ ::Thanks! I'll see what I can do for article expansion in the not-too-distant future. In a related issue, I got a MySpace message from [[Sky Lopez]], whose article stated that she was born in Minnesota, stating that she had never even visited the state. My removal got reverted by an admin, but I left a note on his talk page before reverting back and hopefully the issue is resolved. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 00:21, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

360 +++$+++ Jesanj +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ 360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.309250820E09 +++$+++ at the dyk i submitted for [[fee-for-service]]. i modified it.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ADid_you_know&action=historysubmit&diff=436603691&oldid=436593149]  +++$+++ at the dyk i submitted for [[fee-for-service]]. i modified it.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ADid_you_know&action=historysubmit&diff=436603691&oldid=436593149] [[User:Jesanj|Jesanj]] ([[User talk:Jesanj|talk]]) 01:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
361 +++$+++ Jesanj +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ 360 +++$+++ 360 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309419240E09 +++$+++ i didn't screw up anything, did i?[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&oldid=436951722#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_June_22]  +++$+++ :i didn't screw up anything, did i?[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&oldid=436951722#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_June_22] [[User:Jesanj|Jesanj]] ([[User talk:Jesanj|talk]]) 00:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
362 +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ 360 +++$+++ 361 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.309425300E09 +++$+++ No, no Alt 1 looks great. I'll let someone else verify tho. Thanks. - +++$+++ :*No, no Alt 1 looks great. I'll let someone else verify tho. Thanks. -[[User:IceCreamAntisocial|IceCreamAntisocial]] ([[User talk:IceCreamAntisocial#top|talk]]) 02:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
363 +++$+++ Jesanj +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ 360 +++$+++ 361 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.309426080E09 +++$+++ excellent. thanks. =)  +++$+++ ::excellent. thanks. =) [[User:Jesanj|Jesanj]] ([[User talk:Jesanj|talk]]) 02:28, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

262505 +++$+++ LeadSongDog +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262505 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-13 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.302757740E09 +++$+++ It was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Alzheimer%27s_disease&diff=380917573&oldid=379563018 this edit]. The real question is why the tags remained in place. There's supposed to be another bot IIRC which double checks the dead DOIs to deal with the \"server temporarily down\" issue.  +++$+++ It was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alzheimer%27s_disease&diff=380917573&oldid=379563018 this edit]. The real question is why the tags remained in place. There's supposed to be another bot IIRC which double checks the dead DOIs to deal with the "server temporarily down" issue. [[User:LeadSongDog|LeadSongDog]] <small>[[User talk:LeadSongDog#top|<font color="red" face="Papyrus">come howl!</font>]]</small> 22:09, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
262506 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262505 +++$+++ 262505 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.302757800E09 +++$+++ I see. How annoying for those of us who aren't bots. Oh well, thanks anyways for answering my question.  +++$+++ :I see. How annoying for those of us who aren't bots. Oh well, thanks anyways for answering my question. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

262507 +++$+++ Raul654 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-14 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.302781860E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review#New_FAR_delegate_-_Nikkimaria|this]].  +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review#New_FAR_delegate_-_Nikkimaria|this]]. [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654|talk]]) 04:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
262508 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262507 +++$+++ 262507 +++$+++ 2011-04-14 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.302809100E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 12:25, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

524653 +++$+++ Jackaranga +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-18 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.195446660E09 +++$+++ My opinion is that it is probably not allowed at the reading of [[WP:Non-free content#Unacceptable images]]#12.  But [[Wikipedia:Deletion of all fair use images of living people]] gives some valid points as to why the image could be kept, and your explanation is detailed and specific, so probably it's ok.  It definitely doesn't bother me personally anyway, you can remove the deletion tag.  It could be said that in this case the image is irreplaceable: in order for this article to meet the NPOV policy you need either both or neither picture, and deleting valid material is not a solution.  Perhaps it should be moved from the infobox and placed further down the page as is the case for many actor's articles.  I think as a general rule when users can't agree (\/are not sure ) it is best to keep.  +++$+++ My opinion is that it is probably not allowed at the reading of [[WP:Non-free content#Unacceptable images]]#12.  But [[Wikipedia:Deletion of all fair use images of living people]] gives some valid points as to why the image could be kept, and your explanation is detailed and specific, so probably it's ok.  It definitely doesn't bother me personally anyway, you can remove the deletion tag.  It could be said that in this case the image is irreplaceable: in order for this article to meet the NPOV policy you need either both or neither picture, and deleting valid material is not a solution.  Perhaps it should be moved from the infobox and placed further down the page as is the case for many actor's articles.  I think as a general rule when users can't agree (/are not sure ) it is best to keep. [[User:Jackaranga|Jackaranga]] ([[User talk:Jackaranga|talk]]) 20:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
524654 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524653 +++$+++ 524653 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.195446840E09 +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|43px|left|WikiThanks]] Thanks! -- +++$+++ : [[Image:WikiThanks.png|43px|left|WikiThanks]] Thanks! --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 20:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

366 +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ 366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.310485140E09 +++$+++ Hello :) I see an awesome hook for this article... its just 153 characters too small. Can you bloviate or expand it a bit? heh. Thx! ''' +++$+++ Hello :) I see an awesome hook for this article... its just 153 characters too small. Can you bloviate or expand it a bit? heh. Thx! '''[[User:Rcej|<font color="#259900">Rcej</font>]] (Robert)''' &ndash; '''''[[User talk:Rcej|<font color="#259900">talk</font>]]''''' 08:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
367 +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ 366 +++$+++ 366 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310509440E09 +++$+++ Okay, it's still short but it's expanded! Thanks! - +++$+++ *Okay, it's still short but it's expanded! Thanks! -[[User:IceCreamAntisocial|IceCreamAntisocial]] ([[User talk:IceCreamAntisocial#top|talk]]) 15:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

524655 +++$+++  +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-18 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.195449360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the rearranging.  I am curious about the removal of the house price.  People I am sure are wondering what type of lifestyle the guy is living now.  We have the info.  We should include it unless there is a reason not to, IMO.  I am going to readd it, but if you have a reason, you can remove it with a notice on the talk page.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ Thanks for the rearranging.  I am curious about the removal of the house price.  People I am sure are wondering what type of lifestyle the guy is living now.  We have the info.  We should include it unless there is a reason not to, IMO.  I am going to readd it, but if you have a reason, you can remove it with a notice on the talk page.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:LOTD]]) </small> 21:16, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
524656 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524655 +++$+++ 524655 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.195449660E09 +++$+++ I don't think it's relevant, and it's such a picayune detail that it seems like we are stalking him. The article doesn't say he was particularly rich as a policeman, and just writing that he could buy a home and a boat clearly shows that he is not in the throes of poverty, that should be sufficient. -- +++$+++ : I don't think it's relevant, and it's such a picayune detail that it seems like we are stalking him. The article doesn't say he was particularly rich as a policeman, and just writing that he could buy a home and a boat clearly shows that he is not in the throes of poverty, that should be sufficient. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 21:21, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

369 +++$+++ Victuallers +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ 369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311260640E09 +++$+++ }}  Thank you  +++$+++ }}  Thank you [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 08:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
370 +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ IceCreamAntisocial +++$+++ 369 +++$+++ 369 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.311880980E09 +++$+++ Okay I have reworded and put the reference in the right spot. Will post at DYK. Thx. - +++$+++ *Okay I have reworded and put the reference in the right spot. Will post at DYK. Thx. -[[User:IceCreamAntisocial|IceCreamAntisocial]] ([[User talk:IceCreamAntisocial#top|talk]]) 12:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

611731 +++$+++ Arhugefan +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611731 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-10 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.165802820E09 +++$+++ Can I use a manga image colored by myself? There won't be any problems with the lisense, right?  +++$+++ Can I use a manga image colored by myself? There won't be any problems with the lisense, right? [[User:Arhugefan|Arhugefan]] 18:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
611732 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611731 +++$+++ 611731 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.165803540E09 +++$+++ To be completely honest, I'm not really sure. I'll have to go through [[WP:FAIR]] and\/or [[WP:FUC]] to make sure. \/\/  +++$+++ :To be completely honest, I'm not really sure. I'll have to go through [[WP:FAIR]] and/or [[WP:FUC]] to make sure. // [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuke'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sasuke-kun27|<font color="purple">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 18:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
611733 +++$+++ Kyo cat +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611731 +++$+++ 611732 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.165803780E09 +++$+++ Erm, I think that would be considered fan work. Last time I saw a colored Sakura by a user, and it was taken off. Sorry to butt in. --<font face=\"Papyrus\">'''[[User:Kyo cat\/Esperanza|<span style=\"color:#0c0\">K<\/span>]] +++$+++ ::Erm, I think that would be considered fan work. Last time I saw a colored Sakura by a user, and it was taken off. Sorry to butt in. --<font face="Papyrus">'''[[User:Kyo cat/Esperanza|<span style="color:#0c0">K</span>]][[User:Kyo cat|<span style="color:#f90">yo cat</span>]]'''</font><sup>[[User talk:Kyo cat|¿Qué tal?]]♥[[Special:Contributions/Kyo cat|meow!]]</sup> 18:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
611734 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611731 +++$+++ 611733 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.165803960E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about it. If anything, you can probably help us a bit here. The only problem I have is that I've never dealt with a fan-colored image before. \/\/  +++$+++ :::Don't worry about it. If anything, you can probably help us a bit here. The only problem I have is that I've never dealt with a fan-colored image before. // [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuke'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sasuke-kun27|<font color="purple">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 18:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
611735 +++$+++ Kyo cat +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611731 +++$+++ 611732 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.165804140E09 +++$+++ Sorry if I gave you the wrong answer. I just woke up, I'm doing algebra, and I just (groggily)remembered the time about that colored Sakura. It was taken off immediateley for \"fan-art\". --<font face=\"Papyrus\">'''[[User:Kyo cat\/Esperanza|<span style=\"color:#0c0\">K<\/span>]] +++$+++ ::Sorry if I gave you the wrong answer. I just woke up, I'm doing algebra, and I just (groggily)remembered the time about that colored Sakura. It was taken off immediateley for "fan-art". --<font face="Papyrus">'''[[User:Kyo cat/Esperanza|<span style="color:#0c0">K</span>]][[User:Kyo cat|<span style="color:#f90">yo cat</span>]]'''</font><sup>[[User talk:Kyo cat|¿Qué tal?]]♥[[Special:Contributions/Kyo cat|meow!]]</sup> 18:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
611736 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611731 +++$+++ 611735 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.165805220E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I see what you mean. The picture has been deleted so there's no visual proof, but someone added an image to the article (see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sakura_Haruno_%28Naruto%29&diff=prev&oldid=84164891 here]) and it was removed due to the fact that it was \"fan-art\" (see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sakura_Haruno_%28Naruto%29&diff=next&oldid=84164891 here]). \/\/  +++$+++ :::Yeah, I see what you mean. The picture has been deleted so there's no visual proof, but someone added an image to the article (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sakura_Haruno_%28Naruto%29&diff=prev&oldid=84164891 here]) and it was removed due to the fact that it was "fan-art" (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sakura_Haruno_%28Naruto%29&diff=next&oldid=84164891 here]). // [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuke'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sasuke-kun27|<font color="purple">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 18:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

524660 +++$+++ Cool Hand Luke +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-23 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.195883640E09 +++$+++ You may be interested in commenting at [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources\/Noticeboard#Wikinews redux]].  +++$+++ You may be interested in commenting at [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Wikinews redux]]. [[User:Cool Hand Luke|Cool Hand]] ''[[User talk:Cool Hand Luke|Luke]]'' 21:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
524661 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524660 +++$+++ 524660 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.196288640E09 +++$+++ I gather that seems to have been settled over the weekend, correct? -- +++$+++ : I gather that seems to have been settled over the weekend, correct? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

262206 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-04 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.288859040E09 +++$+++ Although I have no conclusive proof for my first fear above, I feel the circumstantial evidence is worrying enough.   +++$+++ Although I have no conclusive proof for my first fear above, I feel the circumstantial evidence is worrying enough.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 01:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
262207 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262206 +++$+++ 262206 +++$+++ 2010-11-11 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.289473260E09 +++$+++ The rest of the images are fine.   +++$+++ : The rest of the images are fine.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 03:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
262208 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262206 +++$+++ 262207 +++$+++ 2010-11-12 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.289558700E09 +++$+++ Dana, the issue with the German stamps (which affects all of them, not just the one pointed out above) is not solely with their display.  The concept of \"free media\" on Commons (and Wikipedia) is that re-users can modify them to their hearts' content.  The law on German stamps, however, demands the stamps remain whole as is to be reused, eliminating the possibility of cropping.  I see it as a \"grey area\" in the project policies (there are photographs allowed on the basis of [[:commons:Commons:De minimis|''de minimis'']]).  The Deletion Request I pointed out would either lead to the stamps' retention on Commons or their deletion.  I was giving you a heads-up on their status.   +++$+++ :: Dana, the issue with the German stamps (which affects all of them, not just the one pointed out above) is not solely with their display.  The concept of "free media" on Commons (and Wikipedia) is that re-users can modify them to their hearts' content.  The law on German stamps, however, demands the stamps remain whole as is to be reused, eliminating the possibility of cropping.  I see it as a "grey area" in the project policies (there are photographs allowed on the basis of [[:commons:Commons:De minimis|''de minimis'']]).  The Deletion Request I pointed out would either lead to the stamps' retention on Commons or their deletion.  I was giving you a heads-up on their status.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 02:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
262209 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262206 +++$+++ 262208 +++$+++ 2010-11-12 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.289559060E09 +++$+++ As of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Haflinger_(horse)&oldid=396246341 this version], yes, the images are fine.   +++$+++ ::: As of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Haflinger_(horse)&oldid=396246341 this version], yes, the images are fine.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 02:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
262210 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262206 +++$+++ 262209 +++$+++ 2010-11-12 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.289559600E09 +++$+++ Flickr images are generally fine once they have been reviewed by the Flickr bot or a trusted reviewer (so that the status of the license at the time of upload\/review is vouched for).  This one has been vouched for.   +++$+++ :::: Flickr images are generally fine once they have been reviewed by the Flickr bot or a trusted reviewer (so that the status of the license at the time of upload/review is vouched for).  This one has been vouched for.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 03:00, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

262518 +++$+++ Ikkyu2 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262518 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-03 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.138956900E09 +++$+++ I don't actually read that article the same way you seem to have done.  It appears to me that she died of unknown causes with phenobarbital (which she was taking for epilepsy) on board.  It seems pretty clear to me that she died of SUDEP, sudden death in epilepsy.  She wasn't suicidal and there wasn't any evidence that she'd OD'd on phenobarb, which is, incidentally, extremely difficult to do.  Would welcome your comment on this.   +++$+++ I don't actually read that article the same way you seem to have done.  It appears to me that she died of unknown causes with phenobarbital (which she was taking for epilepsy) on board.  It seems pretty clear to me that she died of SUDEP, sudden death in epilepsy.  She wasn't suicidal and there wasn't any evidence that she'd OD'd on phenobarb, which is, incidentally, extremely difficult to do.  Would welcome your comment on this.  [[User:Ikkyu2|Ikkyu2]] 00:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
262519 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262518 +++$+++ 262518 +++$+++ 2006-02-03 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.139002020E09 +++$+++ Like Mariel, I am unable to have any medically informed opinion on this matter. I respect your conclusion but that's [[WP:OR|original research]] unless you can find a good reference to back it up.-- +++$+++ :Like Mariel, I am unable to have any medically informed opinion on this matter. I respect your conclusion but that's [[WP:OR|original research]] unless you can find a good reference to back it up.--[[User:Colin|Colin]] 13:27, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
262520 +++$+++ Ikkyu2 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262518 +++$+++ 262519 +++$+++ 2006-02-05 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.139200860E09 +++$+++ Eh, I guess so.  One of these days I need to write an article about this.   +++$+++ ::Eh, I guess so.  One of these days I need to write an article about this.  [[User:Ikkyu2|Ikkyu2]] 20:41, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

524663 +++$+++ Betacommand +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524663 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-29 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.196380080E09 +++$+++ Check my talkpage.  +++$+++ Check my talkpage. [[User talk:Betacommand|β<sup><sub>command</sub></sup>]] 15:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
524664 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524663 +++$+++ 524663 +++$+++ 2007-11-29 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.196380440E09 +++$+++ Right, I see it there now, and thanks again! -- +++$+++ : Right, I see it there now, and thanks again! --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

376 +++$+++ ErgoSum88 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 376 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-14 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.271236860E09 +++$+++ Hey man, hows it going? Its been a while since I've actively edited, but when I logged on today and checked my watchlist I was greeted with a nice surprise. April 16, [[Federal Bridge Gross Weight Formula]] is going to be featured on the main page! Good thing I've been keeping an eye on it, making sure the links weren't going dead and whatnot. But enough about me, how do you like being an admin? --<span style=\"font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black\"> +++$+++ Hey man, hows it going? Its been a while since I've actively edited, but when I logged on today and checked my watchlist I was greeted with a nice surprise. April 16, [[Federal Bridge Gross Weight Formula]] is going to be featured on the main page! Good thing I've been keeping an eye on it, making sure the links weren't going dead and whatnot. But enough about me, how do you like being an admin? --<span style="font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black">[[User:ErgoSum88|<font color="black">ErgoSum</font>]]•[[User talk:ErgoSum88#top|<font color="black">talk</font>]]•[[Special:Contributions/ErgoSum88|<font color="black">trib</font>]]</span> 02:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
377 +++$+++ Davemeistermoab +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 376 +++$+++ 376 +++$+++ 2010-04-14 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.271242440E09 +++$+++ I have found admin work to be absolutely monotonous. They say Admin is like being a janitor; I think babysitter is more the truth. For the most part I've gone back to article work, and just do admin work when I'm too bored\/lazy\/tired to do article work. A while back on the IRC channel, a distress signal came out for any uninvolved admin to look at a situation, as all admins who knew about it were too involved to intervene. I guess I inhaled too many paint fumes from my home remodeling project, because I volunteered. It sucked to try to sort out who did what while it was still going on, and spiraling more out of control by the second. I issued my royal decree and just hoped I was doing the right thing. It sucked; I'm sure I'll catch hell over it for being an authoritarian jerk sooner-or-later. Why do you ask? Wanna' join the ranks? =-)  +++$+++ :I have found admin work to be absolutely monotonous. They say Admin is like being a janitor; I think babysitter is more the truth. For the most part I've gone back to article work, and just do admin work when I'm too bored/lazy/tired to do article work. A while back on the IRC channel, a distress signal came out for any uninvolved admin to look at a situation, as all admins who knew about it were too involved to intervene. I guess I inhaled too many paint fumes from my home remodeling project, because I volunteered. It sucked to try to sort out who did what while it was still going on, and spiraling more out of control by the second. I issued my royal decree and just hoped I was doing the right thing. It sucked; I'm sure I'll catch hell over it for being an authoritarian jerk sooner-or-later. Why do you ask? Wanna' join the ranks? =-) [[User:Davemeistermoab|Dave]] ([[User talk:Davemeistermoab#top|talk]]) 03:54, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
378 +++$+++ ErgoSum88 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 376 +++$+++ 377 +++$+++ 2010-04-21 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.271833920E09 +++$+++ Ewww, no thanks! I have enough problems of my own, without trying to babysit others. One of the reasons I stopped actively contributing was the politics and drama of it all, although I must say my other hobbies have become more interesting to me lately, which is the main reason I stopped. I've recently taken up gardening! One of the few pastimes that I have never tried, I must say I thoroughly enjoy it. I get to play in the dirt, enjoy the fresh spring air, and there is nothing more satisfying than watching your seeds grow and develop into mature plants. Although I wouldn't recommend it if you're into the whole instant gratification thing. --<span style=\"font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black\"> +++$+++ ::Ewww, no thanks! I have enough problems of my own, without trying to babysit others. One of the reasons I stopped actively contributing was the politics and drama of it all, although I must say my other hobbies have become more interesting to me lately, which is the main reason I stopped. I've recently taken up gardening! One of the few pastimes that I have never tried, I must say I thoroughly enjoy it. I get to play in the dirt, enjoy the fresh spring air, and there is nothing more satisfying than watching your seeds grow and develop into mature plants. Although I wouldn't recommend it if you're into the whole instant gratification thing. --<span style="font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black">[[User:ErgoSum88|<font color="black">ErgoSum</font>]]•[[User talk:ErgoSum88#top|<font color="black">talk</font>]]•[[Special:Contributions/ErgoSum88|<font color="black">trib</font>]]</span> 00:12, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

262521 +++$+++ Ikkyu2 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-03 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.138957140E09 +++$+++ There's some evidence that [[furosemide]] and [[cannabis]] have anticonvulsant activity.  No one's quite sure what the active principle in cannabis is, but it's probably not \u0394-3,9-THC.  It may be dihydrocannabinol.  That article seems to be your baby, so I thought I'd solicit your opinion.   +++$+++ There's some evidence that [[furosemide]] and [[cannabis]] have anticonvulsant activity.  No one's quite sure what the active principle in cannabis is, but it's probably not Δ-3,9-THC.  It may be dihydrocannabinol.  That article seems to be your baby, so I thought I'd solicit your opinion.  [[User:Ikkyu2|Ikkyu2]] 00:59, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
262522 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262521 +++$+++ 262521 +++$+++ 2006-02-03 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.139003700E09 +++$+++ Alternatively, do you think it would be useful for the anticonvulsant article to have a section on drugs \"Under Investigation\"? This would naturally be somewhat fluid when drugs either end up getting licensed or forgotten (no research in the last 5 years, say). -- +++$+++ :Alternatively, do you think it would be useful for the anticonvulsant article to have a section on drugs "Under Investigation"? This would naturally be somewhat fluid when drugs either end up getting licensed or forgotten (no research in the last 5 years, say). --[[User:Colin|Colin]] 13:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

558671 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.176940380E09 +++$+++ No, I was just taking on good faith the reason for the speedy deletion posted on all but the last article [[User:RichRoach]] posted - on the last one, I posted a db-spam myself, but another editor speedied the rest. Having said that, this user would likely qualify for blocking even if these were posted for the first time, as it is obvious spam-bombing, even if all the articles are new.  +++$+++ No, I was just taking on good faith the reason for the speedy deletion posted on all but the last article [[User:RichRoach]] posted - on the last one, I posted a db-spam myself, but another editor speedied the rest. Having said that, this user would likely qualify for blocking even if these were posted for the first time, as it is obvious spam-bombing, even if all the articles are new. [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] 16:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
558672 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558671 +++$+++ 558671 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.176940620E09 +++$+++ Glad to help. I take particular glee in ridding WP of obvious spammers. In may be a character flaw, but ... :-)  +++$+++ :Glad to help. I take particular glee in ridding WP of obvious spammers. In may be a character flaw, but ... :-) [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] 16:57, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

380 +++$+++ ErgoSum88 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 380 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-11 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.276245960E09 +++$+++ Hey Dave hows it going? I don't know if you can help or not, but recently someone from the [[American Trucking Associations]] has started editing the ATA article. I know this is a conflict of interest, no question about that, but some of their edits consist of material copied and pasted from the ATA website. Are they allowed to give permission to do this? They seem to be well-intentioned and I have left a few messages on the contributor's talk page ([[User talk:TruckingMatters]]) and they seem willing to follow the rules. I just thought you could lend your two cents if you have some time. Thanks. --<span style=\"font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black\"> +++$+++ Hey Dave hows it going? I don't know if you can help or not, but recently someone from the [[American Trucking Associations]] has started editing the ATA article. I know this is a conflict of interest, no question about that, but some of their edits consist of material copied and pasted from the ATA website. Are they allowed to give permission to do this? They seem to be well-intentioned and I have left a few messages on the contributor's talk page ([[User talk:TruckingMatters]]) and they seem willing to follow the rules. I just thought you could lend your two cents if you have some time. Thanks. --<span style="font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black">[[User:ErgoSum88|<font color="black">ErgoSum</font>]]•[[User talk:ErgoSum88#top|<font color="black">talk</font>]]•[[Special:Contributions/ErgoSum88|<font color="black">trib</font>]]</span> 01:46, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
381 +++$+++ Davemeistermoab +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 380 +++$+++ 380 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.276247700E09 +++$+++ Hey ErgoSum, how's life? I'm not too concerned about an ATA employee editing an article about the ATA. Conflict of Interest, yes, but that can be managed. However, the bigger issue is the Terms of use on the ATA's website at: [http:\/\/www.truckline.com\/Pages\/TermsofUse.aspx] which specifically prohibits electronic republishing of their work. So, whomever did this needs to publicly state that they are in a position of authority within the ATA to license the text put on Wikipedia under the Creative Commons license, even with the above terms of use on truckline.com.  +++$+++ :Hey ErgoSum, how's life? I'm not too concerned about an ATA employee editing an article about the ATA. Conflict of Interest, yes, but that can be managed. However, the bigger issue is the Terms of use on the ATA's website at: [http://www.truckline.com/Pages/TermsofUse.aspx] which specifically prohibits electronic republishing of their work. So, whomever did this needs to publicly state that they are in a position of authority within the ATA to license the text put on Wikipedia under the Creative Commons license, even with the above terms of use on truckline.com. [[User:Davemeistermoab|Dave]] ([[User talk:Davemeistermoab#top|talk]]) 02:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
382 +++$+++ ErgoSum88 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 380 +++$+++ 381 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.276309560E09 +++$+++ Ok thats all I wanted to know. I wasn't sure how the whole COI thing was handled, but I knew the copyright issue would be a problem. I had never heard of the OTRS thing so thanks for explaining that, now I know. Happy editing! --<span style=\"font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black\"> +++$+++ ::Ok thats all I wanted to know. I wasn't sure how the whole COI thing was handled, but I knew the copyright issue would be a problem. I had never heard of the OTRS thing so thanks for explaining that, now I know. Happy editing! --<span style="font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black">[[User:ErgoSum88|<font color="black">ErgoSum</font>]]•[[User talk:ErgoSum88#top|<font color="black">talk</font>]]•[[Special:Contributions/ErgoSum88|<font color="black">trib</font>]]</span> 19:26, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

262526 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Fuzzform 19:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ Fuzzform 19:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
262527 +++$+++ Fuzzform +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262526 +++$+++ 262526 +++$+++ 2006-02-12 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.139806260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Fuzzform|Fuzzform]] 20:51, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

383 +++$+++ Rschen7754 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-06 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.281101640E09 +++$+++ Would you be interested in going through the Utah articles and performing an assessment audit (making sure that all article assessments are correct?) Scott and I both tried and failed at doing so because we're not quite sure when an article is complete enough for B-Class since we're not familiar with the roads. --''' +++$+++ Would you be interested in going through the Utah articles and performing an assessment audit (making sure that all article assessments are correct?) Scott and I both tried and failed at doing so because we're not quite sure when an article is complete enough for B-Class since we're not familiar with the roads. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 06:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
384 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 383 +++$+++ 383 +++$+++ 2010-08-14 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.281781740E09 +++$+++ For the next few days my wikipedia time will be forcibly sporadic. And to be honest, I have higher priorities with what to do with my limited wikipedia time than reviewing rankings, (namely put the finishing touches on [[Thistle, Utah]] before nominating for FA and catching up on some long promised reviews of other articles for people). With that said, Utah is one of the easiest states to rank, as UDOT provides official sources for the route description on all state routes, and history on most. I'd check for sources to those section. route description: [http:\/\/www.udot.utah.gov\/main\/f?p=100:pg:0:::1:T,V:814,] History: [http:\/\/www.udot.utah.gov\/main\/f?p=100:pg:0:::1:T,V:814,] Good Luck!  +++$+++ :For the next few days my wikipedia time will be forcibly sporadic. And to be honest, I have higher priorities with what to do with my limited wikipedia time than reviewing rankings, (namely put the finishing touches on [[Thistle, Utah]] before nominating for FA and catching up on some long promised reviews of other articles for people). With that said, Utah is one of the easiest states to rank, as UDOT provides official sources for the route description on all state routes, and history on most. I'd check for sources to those section. route description: [http://www.udot.utah.gov/main/f?p=100:pg:0:::1:T,V:814,] History: [http://www.udot.utah.gov/main/f?p=100:pg:0:::1:T,V:814,] Good Luck! [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 03:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

524672 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-01 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.196507100E09 +++$+++ I just saw your edit note.  Well spoken.  I'm not offended in the least.  Grateful, actually. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ I just saw your edit note.  Well spoken.  I'm not offended in the least.  Grateful, actually. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 03:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
524673 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524672 +++$+++ 524672 +++$+++ 2007-12-01 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.196508180E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I hoped you would see it that way, but unasked for advice does run the risk of being more offensive than helpful, I'm glad I got lucky. :-) You know, a bit over a week ago, I thought I'd be supporting you for arbcom; I looked around your user space and was very impressed with the idea of giving awards to reformed vandals, I thought that was exactly the kind of attitude we didn't have enough of. We have plenty of \"indefinite block and throw away the key\" hard liner admins, plenty of \"let's give then yet another and another and another chance\" softy admins (I'm one of those, I think :-) ), but the \"tough but appreciative\" combination was very rare. Ah well. Stick around. As I think I wrote already, if you just keep doing the ''good'' things you do regularly, not only I, but most of your current critics will probably support you for a return RFA in three or four months. If you ''want'' the buttons back, of course, it's not a low-stress job at any time. -- +++$+++ : Thanks. I hoped you would see it that way, but unasked for advice does run the risk of being more offensive than helpful, I'm glad I got lucky. :-) You know, a bit over a week ago, I thought I'd be supporting you for arbcom; I looked around your user space and was very impressed with the idea of giving awards to reformed vandals, I thought that was exactly the kind of attitude we didn't have enough of. We have plenty of "indefinite block and throw away the key" hard liner admins, plenty of "let's give then yet another and another and another chance" softy admins (I'm one of those, I think :-) ), but the "tough but appreciative" combination was very rare. Ah well. Stick around. As I think I wrote already, if you just keep doing the ''good'' things you do regularly, not only I, but most of your current critics will probably support you for a return RFA in three or four months. If you ''want'' the buttons back, of course, it's not a low-stress job at any time. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 03:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
524674 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524672 +++$+++ 524672 +++$+++ 2007-12-01 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.196518800E09 +++$+++ Ah, nevermind. I see that he is a sockpuppet and has been blocked indefinitely. Anyway, see you around, AnonEMouse.  +++$+++ :Ah, nevermind. I see that he is a sockpuppet and has been blocked indefinitely. Anyway, see you around, AnonEMouse. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] 06:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

385 +++$+++ Bradadkins274 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 385 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-13 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.287034860E09 +++$+++ (we'll see if this signature thing works for me)  +++$+++ (we'll see if this signature thing works for me) [[User:Bradadkins274|Bradadkins274]] ([[User talk:Bradadkins274|talk]]) 22:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
386 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 385 +++$+++ 385 +++$+++ 2010-10-13 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.287035340E09 +++$+++ No problem. I hope you understand that the barrage of \"copyright infringement\" stuff left on your talk page comes from a desire to avoid more problems than we already have. It is not an attempt to accuse you of any wrongdoing. I know your intentions are good. FYI, Federal government created content is public domain by law; however, that is not necessarily true of state government created content. The policy varies from state to state. I was going off the terms of use at utah.gov. However, if you are aware of a more binding policy or law for the state of Utah's copyright policy, please advise, as I have other articles I'm working on that could use this, including some photos of Thistle I'd like to use.  +++$+++ :No problem. I hope you understand that the barrage of "copyright infringement" stuff left on your talk page comes from a desire to avoid more problems than we already have. It is not an attempt to accuse you of any wrongdoing. I know your intentions are good. FYI, Federal government created content is public domain by law; however, that is not necessarily true of state government created content. The policy varies from state to state. I was going off the terms of use at utah.gov. However, if you are aware of a more binding policy or law for the state of Utah's copyright policy, please advise, as I have other articles I'm working on that could use this, including some photos of Thistle I'd like to use. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 22:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

387 +++$+++ Bradadkins274 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-14 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.287102180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Bradadkins274|Bradadkins274]] ([[User talk:Bradadkins274|talk]]) 17:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
388 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 387 +++$+++ 387 +++$+++ 2010-10-15 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.287205020E09 +++$+++ My apologies, this is the first time I've had internet access since my last message to you. It looks like things are working out. Thanks for going the extra mile on the permissions stuff. I will be without regular internet access for the next few days. However, if you still need assistance then, please let me know.  +++$+++ :My apologies, this is the first time I've had internet access since my last message to you. It looks like things are working out. Thanks for going the extra mile on the permissions stuff. I will be without regular internet access for the next few days. However, if you still need assistance then, please let me know. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 21:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

524676 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-02 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.196584500E09 +++$+++ ...[http:\/\/forum.adultdvdtalk.com\/forum\/topic.dlt\/topic_id=112336\/forum_id=1\/cat_id=1\/reply=1162286 regarding a certain WikiProject] that you should probably be aware of, if you aren't already. Spotted the mention of this at [[Talk:Kylie Ireland]].  +++$+++ ...[http://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/forum/topic.dlt/topic_id=112336/forum_id=1/cat_id=1/reply=1162286 regarding a certain WikiProject] that you should probably be aware of, if you aren't already. Spotted the mention of this at [[Talk:Kylie Ireland]]. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 00:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
524677 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524676 +++$+++ 524676 +++$+++ 2007-12-02 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.196584560E09 +++$+++ Also, you have mail.  +++$+++ :Also, you have mail. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 00:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
524678 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524676 +++$+++ 524677 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.196724780E09 +++$+++ Oh my. Thanks very much for pointing that out; no, I wasn't aware of it. I think I've \"met\" morbidthoughts (he had some nice Flickr photos that I asked if we could use, and got turned down because we couldn't accept the \"no modifications\" clause), and he mentioned he was a Wikipedia editor. I guess I should log in there and say something, especially as some noted figures seem to be participating. Unfortunately I'll have to be very careful what I write, not to offend people, and will probably still be roasted over an open fire for my troubles. Let me take a deep breath and look into other things first, as this won't be easy. (And you sent me ''two'' emails to look into... thanks... I think...)-- +++$+++ :: Oh my. Thanks very much for pointing that out; no, I wasn't aware of it. I think I've "met" morbidthoughts (he had some nice Flickr photos that I asked if we could use, and got turned down because we couldn't accept the "no modifications" clause), and he mentioned he was a Wikipedia editor. I guess I should log in there and say something, especially as some noted figures seem to be participating. Unfortunately I'll have to be very careful what I write, not to offend people, and will probably still be roasted over an open fire for my troubles. Let me take a deep breath and look into other things first, as this won't be easy. (And you sent me ''two'' emails to look into... thanks... I think...)--[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
524679 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524676 +++$+++ 524678 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.196725680E09 +++$+++ The e-mail from [[Naked News]] was just FYI - I'll work that one. The babes.net is more involved than I have time for right now, I'm afraid, though I can spend some time on it in a couple of weeks.  +++$+++ :::The e-mail from [[Naked News]] was just FYI - I'll work that one. The babes.net is more involved than I have time for right now, I'm afraid, though I can spend some time on it in a couple of weeks. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 15:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
524680 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524676 +++$+++ 524678 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.196748660E09 +++$+++ Whew. I made an account, wrote a reply, [[User:AnonEMouse\/AdultDVDTalk]], and linked to it in the thread. I hope this helps more than it hurts. For revenge ;-) I dropped your user name in that doc as well. May you be swamped with freely released images! -- +++$+++ ::: Whew. I made an account, wrote a reply, [[User:AnonEMouse/AdultDVDTalk]], and linked to it in the thread. I hope this helps more than it hurts. For revenge ;-) I dropped your user name in that doc as well. May you be swamped with freely released images! --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 22:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
524681 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524676 +++$+++ 524680 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.196753640E09 +++$+++ Your reply was great...hopefully they take the time to read it. I'm happy to help with images as they come in - as a matter of fact, I just got a huge zip file with photos of all the female anchors on [[Naked News]] licensed as GFDL - will upload ASAP.  +++$+++ :::: Your reply was great...hopefully they take the time to read it. I'm happy to help with images as they come in - as a matter of fact, I just got a huge zip file with photos of all the female anchors on [[Naked News]] licensed as GFDL - will upload ASAP. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 23:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

262533 +++$+++ Dethomas +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262533 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-15 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.140052680E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ Regards, [[User:Dethomas|Dethomas]] 17:18, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
262534 +++$+++ Dethomas +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262533 +++$+++ 262533 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.140092220E09 +++$+++ I responded to your question [[user_talk:dethomas#PD-self_vs_No_rights_reserved | here]] Regards,  +++$+++ :I responded to your question [[user_talk:dethomas#PD-self_vs_No_rights_reserved | here]] Regards, [[User:Dethomas|Dethomas]] 04:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

262535 +++$+++ Brossow +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262535 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-16 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.140138300E09 +++$+++ Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.  +++$+++ Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. [[User:Brossow|BRossow]] 17:05, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
262536 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262535 +++$+++ 262535 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.140138780E09 +++$+++ Done -- +++$+++ :Done --[[User:Colin|Colin]] 17:13, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

393 +++$+++ Imzadi1979 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.289968440E09 +++$+++ I don't know if you want to add this to the [[U.S. Route 395 in California]] article or not, but I plan on adding it to the [[U.S. Route 8]] article if I can find a good way to integrate it. The two highways are shown [http:\/\/bttf.wikia.com\/wiki\/File:Hillandmain1985.jpg running concurrently] through Hill Valley, CA in the movie ''[[Back To The Future]]''. Tonight's project will be to rent the movie and find the time index for that screen capture. I don't know that we can upload and use the photo under fair use, but I'll ask someone. This isn't to say that every movie ever made that shows highway markers should be listed in our articles, but I think in this case, at least for US&nbsp;8 there is a good case to include it. After all, the highway is primarily in Minnesota and Wisconsin, but it was shown in Southern California in the movie. <span style=\"background:#006B54; padding:2px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\" >''' +++$+++ I don't know if you want to add this to the [[U.S. Route 395 in California]] article or not, but I plan on adding it to the [[U.S. Route 8]] article if I can find a good way to integrate it. The two highways are shown [http://bttf.wikia.com/wiki/File:Hillandmain1985.jpg running concurrently] through Hill Valley, CA in the movie ''[[Back To The Future]]''. Tonight's project will be to rent the movie and find the time index for that screen capture. I don't know that we can upload and use the photo under fair use, but I'll ask someone. This isn't to say that every movie ever made that shows highway markers should be listed in our articles, but I think in this case, at least for US&nbsp;8 there is a good case to include it. After all, the highway is primarily in Minnesota and Wisconsin, but it was shown in Southern California in the movie. <span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" >'''[[User:Imzadi1979|<font color="white">Imzadi</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Imzadi1979|<font color="white">1979</font>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Imzadi1979|<font color="white"><big>→</big></font>]]'''</span> 20:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
394 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 393 +++$+++ 393 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.289975760E09 +++$+++ I don't plan to mention it. If US 395 played a part in the actual plot, I would. In this case, the highway shields are a prop in a movie set. They most likely intentionally  coincide with actual highway designations for realism.  Another example of this is in the movie [[Thelma & Louise]]. While the couple are unknowingly rushing towards the Grand Canyon, a planted [[Arizona State Route 64]] shield is visible. The real AZ-64 leads to the Grand Canyon; however, this scene was actually shot in my usernamesake town of Moab. In the case of US-8 and Back to the Future, if I had to guess,  I'd say the intent was to pay homage to [[Interstate 8]] with that sign. However, in 1955 an interstate highway shield would  be an [[anachronism]].  +++$+++ :I don't plan to mention it. If US 395 played a part in the actual plot, I would. In this case, the highway shields are a prop in a movie set. They most likely intentionally  coincide with actual highway designations for realism.  Another example of this is in the movie [[Thelma & Louise]]. While the couple are unknowingly rushing towards the Grand Canyon, a planted [[Arizona State Route 64]] shield is visible. The real AZ-64 leads to the Grand Canyon; however, this scene was actually shot in my usernamesake town of Moab. In the case of US-8 and Back to the Future, if I had to guess,  I'd say the intent was to pay homage to [[Interstate 8]] with that sign. However, in 1955 an interstate highway shield would  be an [[anachronism]]. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 22:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

395 +++$+++ Laser_brain +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-25 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.290694800E09 +++$+++ I'm slowly but surely getting to this! I hope to be through it this weekend. It looks very interesting so far\u2014this is the kind of thing I would pull over and look at if I passed it on the highway. A motorcycle trip may be in order. -- +++$+++ I'm slowly but surely getting to this! I hope to be through it this weekend. It looks very interesting so far—this is the kind of thing I would pull over and look at if I passed it on the highway. A motorcycle trip may be in order. --[[User:Laser_brain|<font color="purple">'''Andy Walsh'''</font >]] [[User_talk:Laser_brain|<font color="purple">(talk)</font >]] 06:20, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
396 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 395 +++$+++ 395 +++$+++ 2010-11-25 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.290747360E09 +++$+++ I Appreciate the help. As for the motorcycle trip, well there isn't much left any more. It would be more interesting to a geologist than a ghost town hunter. I've been there many times and have vague memories of when it was a town, stopping with my family for a Coke or whatever. Only wish I had a picture of it, it was actually a quaint pretty little town back in the day.  +++$+++ :I Appreciate the help. As for the motorcycle trip, well there isn't much left any more. It would be more interesting to a geologist than a ghost town hunter. I've been there many times and have vague memories of when it was a town, stopping with my family for a Coke or whatever. Only wish I had a picture of it, it was actually a quaint pretty little town back in the day. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 20:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

398 +++$+++ SMasters +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-10 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.291992300E09 +++$+++ Thank you for contributions to the project, Great work and fantastic effort.  Congratulations, and may you wear the Imperial Napoleonic crowns well.  \u2013 ''' +++$+++ Thank you for contributions to the project, Great work and fantastic effort.  Congratulations, and may you wear the Imperial Napoleonic crowns well.  – '''[[User:SMasters|SMasters]]''' ([[User talk:SMasters#top|talk]]) 06:45, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
399 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 398 +++$+++ 398 +++$+++ 2010-12-10 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.292029200E09 +++$+++ Ohh! Shiny! Thanks!  +++$+++ :Ohh! Shiny! Thanks! [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 17:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
400 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 398 +++$+++ 398 +++$+++ 2010-12-10 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.292022900E09 +++$+++ \"The maintenance crew did not think much of the situation, however, and repaired the track as needed.\" I don't think the phrase \"didn't think much of\" is appropriate here, as it implies that they disapproved of the situation. Does this really mean that they didn't consider the situation to be a serious one?  +++$+++ *"The maintenance crew did not think much of the situation, however, and repaired the track as needed." I don't think the phrase "didn't think much of" is appropriate here, as it implies that they disapproved of the situation. Does this really mean that they didn't consider the situation to be a serious one? [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 15:15, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
401 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 398 +++$+++ 398 +++$+++ 2010-12-10 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.292029200E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the help. Merry Christmas and Cheers! [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 17:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC) PS I'll give it a stab at clarifying  +++$+++ :I appreciate the help. Merry Christmas and Cheers! [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 17:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC) PS I'll give it a stab at clarifying [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 17:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

524689 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-03 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.196737440E09 +++$+++ Yes, I was wondering if I should point that out to you if you hadn't seen it yourself. That is very relevant. You can use it as a model, but also take a look at the Peer Review and Featured Article Discussion for that article, (linked to from the article talk page, a drop down list at the top) and see if you can apply it to your candidates before your reviewers do. :-) -- +++$+++ Yes, I was wondering if I should point that out to you if you hadn't seen it yourself. That is very relevant. You can use it as a model, but also take a look at the Peer Review and Featured Article Discussion for that article, (linked to from the article talk page, a drop down list at the top) and see if you can apply it to your candidates before your reviewers do. :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 19:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
524690 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524689 +++$+++ 524689 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.196738460E09 +++$+++ Will do. I blue-linked at least one name at that article. Several people who worked on that film went on from Suzuki's stable of co-workers to work in my genre. And there are other names on the article in dire need of blue-linking, such as the wild & wacky Atsushi Yamatoya, who went on to write & direct the immortal classic ''Inflatable Sex Doll of the Wastelands'' (1967)... Can't wait to get that article started!  +++$+++ :Will do. I blue-linked at least one name at that article. Several people who worked on that film went on from Suzuki's stable of co-workers to work in my genre. And there are other names on the article in dire need of blue-linking, such as the wild & wacky Atsushi Yamatoya, who went on to write & direct the immortal classic ''Inflatable Sex Doll of the Wastelands'' (1967)... Can't wait to get that article started! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 19:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

402 +++$+++ SMasters +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-17 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.292606520E09 +++$+++ Vroom, vroom... Thank you for all your hard work. May you wear the crowns well, and may the crown sign lead you on the highway to more outstanding articles. \u2013 ''' +++$+++ Vroom, vroom... Thank you for all your hard work. May you wear the crowns well, and may the crown sign lead you on the highway to more outstanding articles. – '''[[User:SMasters|SMasters]]''' ([[User talk:SMasters#top|talk]]) 09:22, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
403 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 402 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-17 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.292637720E09 +++$+++ Ohh, more Shiny!!!. Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Ohh, more Shiny!!!. Thanks! [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 18:02, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

262548 +++$+++ Fuzzform +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262548 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-10 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.142046060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Fuzzform|Fuzzform]] 19:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
262549 +++$+++ Fuzzform +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262548 +++$+++ 262548 +++$+++ 2006-03-10 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.142052600E09 +++$+++ I suppose that's true. I would rather not do away with them though. The RxList link is good, because all of the references from there are on seperate pages (the basic info about diazepam comes from PubChem and DrugBank).  +++$+++ :I suppose that's true. I would rather not do away with them though. The RxList link is good, because all of the references from there are on seperate pages (the basic info about diazepam comes from PubChem and DrugBank). [[User:Fuzzform|Fuzzform]] 20:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
262550 +++$+++ Fuzzform +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262548 +++$+++ 262549 +++$+++ 2006-03-11 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.142131200E09 +++$+++ I see what you mean, but it says in the Wikipedia article that \"using in-line citations is not necessarily recommended.\" In other words, sticking the code after each referenced entry makes things somwhat sloppy and confusing looking. This is a better way to cite, I agree, because it keeps the numbers in order. I'd completely overlooked that. Thanks for pointing it out before I went any further. I'm going to try to develop something between the two, with actual citation code being under the references section.  +++$+++ ::I see what you mean, but it says in the Wikipedia article that "using in-line citations is not necessarily recommended." In other words, sticking the code after each referenced entry makes things somwhat sloppy and confusing looking. This is a better way to cite, I agree, because it keeps the numbers in order. I'd completely overlooked that. Thanks for pointing it out before I went any further. I'm going to try to develop something between the two, with actual citation code being under the references section. [[User:Fuzzform|Fuzzform]] 18:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
262551 +++$+++ Fuzzform +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262548 +++$+++ 262550 +++$+++ 2006-03-11 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.142133420E09 +++$+++ I'm trying to avoid placing the citation code in the main body of the article. It clutters the code, and makes it hard to edit. Is there a way to place it in the references section and simply have each numbered citation direct down to the appropriate reference?  +++$+++ :::I'm trying to avoid placing the citation code in the main body of the article. It clutters the code, and makes it hard to edit. Is there a way to place it in the references section and simply have each numbered citation direct down to the appropriate reference? [[User:Fuzzform|Fuzzform]] 19:17, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
262552 +++$+++ Fuzzform +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262548 +++$+++ 262550 +++$+++ 2006-03-11 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.142134380E09 +++$+++ No, I understand the syntax, I was just trying to use it for something it wasn't designed for. That explains a lot, not having to enter citations more than once. I was under the impression that you had to repeat the code (that would make the article look awefully messy). Keeping this in mind, I'll give it another try.  +++$+++ :::No, I understand the syntax, I was just trying to use it for something it wasn't designed for. That explains a lot, not having to enter citations more than once. I was under the impression that you had to repeat the code (that would make the article look awefully messy). Keeping this in mind, I'll give it another try. [[User:Fuzzform|Fuzzform]] 19:33, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
262553 +++$+++ Fuzzform +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262548 +++$+++ 262550 +++$+++ 2006-03-11 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.142135400E09 +++$+++ Yes, I can see that. I've been looking at the list of people with epilepsy, and it doesn't seem to define a reference name. This is what I'm trying to work out at the moment.  +++$+++ :::Yes, I can see that. I've been looking at the list of people with epilepsy, and it doesn't seem to define a reference name. This is what I'm trying to work out at the moment. [[User:Fuzzform|Fuzzform]] 19:50, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
262554 +++$+++ Fuzzform +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262548 +++$+++ 262548 +++$+++ 2006-03-11 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.142136240E09 +++$+++ I've FINALLY figured it out. Shouldn't be any more problems now. I was forgetting the \"end reference\" statement.  +++$+++ :I've FINALLY figured it out. Shouldn't be any more problems now. I was forgetting the "end reference" statement. [[User:Fuzzform|Fuzzform]] 20:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

405 +++$+++ Laser_brain +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 405 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-22 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.293078840E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Hope you have a lovely holiday season. I have one request: At least once this season, completely ruin someone's attempt to piss you off. If someone cuts you off in traffic or shits on you at work, just smile and wave and tell them Happy Holidays. Maybe they'll be less of an asshole, even if it's just for the rest of the day.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Hope you have a lovely holiday season. I have one request: At least once this season, completely ruin someone's attempt to piss you off. If someone cuts you off in traffic or shits on you at work, just smile and wave and tell them Happy Holidays. Maybe they'll be less of an asshole, even if it's just for the rest of the day. [[User:Laser_brain|<font color="purple">'''Andy Walsh'''</font >]] [[User_talk:Laser_brain|<font color="purple">(talk)</font >]] 20:34, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
406 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 405 +++$+++ 405 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.293282060E09 +++$+++ Amazingly enough, nobody's tries yet. Sigh, maybe tomorrow. =-) Thanks and back at you.  +++$+++ :Amazingly enough, nobody's tries yet. Sigh, maybe tomorrow. =-) Thanks and back at you. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 05:01, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

524694 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524694 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.197001800E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For the excellent work in bringing balance and neutrality to the [[Louise Glover]] biography.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For the excellent work in bringing balance and neutrality to the [[Louise Glover]] biography. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 20:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
524695 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524694 +++$+++ 524694 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.197002700E09 +++$+++ Gee, thanks, guys, you're both really too kind! -- +++$+++ : Gee, thanks, guys, you're both really too kind! --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 20:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

408 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-13 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.294910700E09 +++$+++ Yep, well done. Your patience (and dogged persistence?) paid off.  +++$+++ Yep, well done. Your patience (and dogged persistence?) paid off. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 01:25, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
409 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 408 +++$+++ 408 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.294925280E09 +++$+++ Thanks everybody, Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks everybody, Thanks. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 05:28, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
410 +++$+++ Finetooth +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 408 +++$+++ 409 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.294969380E09 +++$+++ Congratulations from me too, and thanks for the unexpected barnstar.  +++$+++ ::Congratulations from me too, and thanks for the unexpected barnstar. [[User:Finetooth|Finetooth]] ([[User talk:Finetooth|talk]]) 17:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
411 +++$+++ ErgoSum88 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 408 +++$+++ 410 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.294986180E09 +++$+++ Congrrratulations! I'm so jealous, this makes me want to come out of semi-retirement. --<span style=\"font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black\"> +++$+++ :::Congrrratulations! I'm so jealous, this makes me want to come out of semi-retirement. --<span style="font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black">[[User:ErgoSum88|<font color="black">ErgoSum</font>]]•[[User talk:ErgoSum88#top|<font color="black">talk</font>]]•[[Special:Contributions/ErgoSum88|<font color="black">trib</font>]]</span> 22:23, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
412 +++$+++ Laser_brain +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 408 +++$+++ 411 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.294986540E09 +++$+++ Same from me, and thanks for the barnstar. -- +++$+++ :::: Same from me, and thanks for the barnstar. --[[User:Laser_brain|<font color="purple">'''Andy Walsh'''</font >]] [[User_talk:Laser_brain|<font color="purple">(talk)</font >]] 22:29, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
413 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 408 +++$+++ 412 +++$+++ 2011-01-17 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.295322300E09 +++$+++ Andy you're welcome. Ergosum, please do consider coming back. We haven't had a trucking related article on the front page since you left. Coincidence? I think not. =-)  +++$+++ :::::Andy you're welcome. Ergosum, please do consider coming back. We haven't had a trucking related article on the front page since you left. Coincidence? I think not. =-) [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 19:45, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
414 +++$+++ ErgoSum88 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 408 +++$+++ 413 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.295424180E09 +++$+++ Of course its no coincidence! But I cringe at the thought of the ridiculous amounts of work necessary to even submit an article for FA review, much less getting it to pass. It seems I'm the only editor who is interested in trucking articles, and believe me, I've tried to recruit other editors to help me out, to no avail. If I had some help (preferably from someone with knowledge of the industry), then I would have no problem writing more articles. Not to mention the local library sucks... sigh. --<span style=\"font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black\"> +++$+++ ::::::Of course its no coincidence! But I cringe at the thought of the ridiculous amounts of work necessary to even submit an article for FA review, much less getting it to pass. It seems I'm the only editor who is interested in trucking articles, and believe me, I've tried to recruit other editors to help me out, to no avail. If I had some help (preferably from someone with knowledge of the industry), then I would have no problem writing more articles. Not to mention the local library sucks... sigh. --<span style="font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black">[[User:ErgoSum88|<font color="black">ErgoSum</font>]]•[[User talk:ErgoSum88#top|<font color="black">talk</font>]]•[[Special:Contributions/ErgoSum88|<font color="black">trib</font>]]</span> 00:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

524698 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524698 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.197010560E09 +++$+++ Thank you again for being considerate.  I hope this doesn't come across the wrong way, but as a veteran I'm having second thoughts.  My grandfather earned a purple heart - a real one - and I don't want to cheapen the honor that attaches to the actual medal.  Sticks and stones may break my bones, you know?  Could we change this to a resilient barnstar?  Your thoughtfulness has me very obliged. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Thank you again for being considerate.  I hope this doesn't come across the wrong way, but as a veteran I'm having second thoughts.  My grandfather earned a purple heart - a real one - and I don't want to cheapen the honor that attaches to the actual medal.  Sticks and stones may break my bones, you know?  Could we change this to a resilient barnstar?  Your thoughtfulness has me very obliged. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 22:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
524699 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524698 +++$+++ 524698 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.197013980E09 +++$+++ We can if you like, but it's not a purple heart, you know, it's a purple barnstar. It's for virtual damage. The only thing being shot up is your reputation - though, since you have been a public speaker about the WP, that's a painful target, ''and'' The Guardian is fairly large caliber weaponry. But it's your award, I'll change it to what you like. (PS: I've never attended your presentations, but from reading them, you said good things. I would absolutely hate to lose you. Illegitimi non carborundum.) -- +++$+++ : We can if you like, but it's not a purple heart, you know, it's a purple barnstar. It's for virtual damage. The only thing being shot up is your reputation - though, since you have been a public speaker about the WP, that's a painful target, ''and'' The Guardian is fairly large caliber weaponry. But it's your award, I'll change it to what you like. (PS: I've never attended your presentations, but from reading them, you said good things. I would absolutely hate to lose you. Illegitimi non carborundum.) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 23:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
524700 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524698 +++$+++ 524699 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.197014400E09 +++$+++ I'm trying very hard these days to avoid giving inadvertent offense.  Earned a few small medals of my own while I was in the Navy; I know what a big deal the important ones are.  Hm, maybe I'll write up the ones I have.  It's something I thought of doing a long time ago.  Cheers, <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::I'm trying very hard these days to avoid giving inadvertent offense.  Earned a few small medals of my own while I was in the Navy; I know what a big deal the important ones are.  Hm, maybe I'll write up the ones I have.  It's something I thought of doing a long time ago.  Cheers, <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 00:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
524701 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524698 +++$+++ 524698 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.197016320E09 +++$+++ Medals are all right for impressing civilians and recruits (I've got 7 rows of them myself, most of them simply for going where I was told to go, and doing what I was told to do, like a good little boy), but really they're just bits of metal and cloth, and it's never wise to [[Jeremy Michael Boorda|take them too seriously]].   +++$+++ :Medals are all right for impressing civilians and recruits (I've got 7 rows of them myself, most of them simply for going where I was told to go, and doing what I was told to do, like a good little boy), but really they're just bits of metal and cloth, and it's never wise to [[Jeremy Michael Boorda|take them too seriously]].  [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 00:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
524702 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524698 +++$+++ 524701 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.197017160E09 +++$+++ OK, I'm impressed, I'm impressed. Both of you. :-) But frankly, you both had already impressed me, what with the speeches and detective work and crowns from one, and the amazing image proliferation and article subject contacts from the other. <small>What do you want, a medal... er, let me rephrase that... :-)<\/small> Stop before Tony the Marine feels he needs to show up and list his real life badges as well! :-) -- +++$+++ :: OK, I'm impressed, I'm impressed. Both of you. :-) But frankly, you both had already impressed me, what with the speeches and detective work and crowns from one, and the amazing image proliferation and article subject contacts from the other. <small>What do you want, a medal... er, let me rephrase that... :-)</small> Stop before Tony the Marine feels he needs to show up and list his real life badges as well! :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 00:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
524703 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524698 +++$+++ 524702 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.197018120E09 +++$+++ Gah - you didn't get the point - don't be impressed by medals! 99% of military medals that people earn are just \"gimmes\" - campaign medals, unit awards, completing a tour of duty without getting in trouble, B.S. like that. For example, I got an [[Aerial Achievement Medal]] for every 20 recon missions I flew, even when the missions were as routine as could be. I got a [[Combat Readiness Medal]] for every two years I collected flight pay. Medals mostly just indicate how good your supervisor is at writing up a citation. I've known chiefs and generals with chestfuls of fruit salad, up to and including the [[Bronze Star]] and [[Legion of Merit]], who were absolutely freaking worthless and couldn't lead sailors into a whorehouse. I've also known people who accomplished amazing, courageous things who got jack because nobody important happened to be looking. [[Medal of Honor]]? Impressive. Same goes for the [[Silver Star]] and the [[Distinguished Service Cross]]. But even [[Purple Heart]]s and [[Bronze Star]]s are sometimes gimmes now - those medals has been frequently degraded at least since Vietnam (given out for scratches, sometimes), so don't be impressed unless you see the citation. Sorry, didn't mean to rant, but GIs bragging about their medals sometimes makes me want to bring out the smackdown. Durova, this isn't directed at you, but at the creeping careerism in American military culture. :)  +++$+++ ::: Gah - you didn't get the point - don't be impressed by medals! 99% of military medals that people earn are just "gimmes" - campaign medals, unit awards, completing a tour of duty without getting in trouble, B.S. like that. For example, I got an [[Aerial Achievement Medal]] for every 20 recon missions I flew, even when the missions were as routine as could be. I got a [[Combat Readiness Medal]] for every two years I collected flight pay. Medals mostly just indicate how good your supervisor is at writing up a citation. I've known chiefs and generals with chestfuls of fruit salad, up to and including the [[Bronze Star]] and [[Legion of Merit]], who were absolutely freaking worthless and couldn't lead sailors into a whorehouse. I've also known people who accomplished amazing, courageous things who got jack because nobody important happened to be looking. [[Medal of Honor]]? Impressive. Same goes for the [[Silver Star]] and the [[Distinguished Service Cross]]. But even [[Purple Heart]]s and [[Bronze Star]]s are sometimes gimmes now - those medals has been frequently degraded at least since Vietnam (given out for scratches, sometimes), so don't be impressed unless you see the citation. Sorry, didn't mean to rant, but GIs bragging about their medals sometimes makes me want to bring out the smackdown. Durova, this isn't directed at you, but at the creeping careerism in American military culture. :) [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 01:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

262555 +++$+++ Ender3057 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262555 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-14 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.142361060E09 +++$+++ Don't let 'authority script' fool you for NSW\/VIC though, they're very easy to get. The doctor just has to give an assurance by phone that the patient meets the guidelines.  +++$+++ Don't let 'authority script' fool you for NSW/VIC though, they're very easy to get. The doctor just has to give an assurance by phone that the patient meets the guidelines. [[User:Ender3057|Ender]] 10:31, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
262556 +++$+++ Eternal Equinox +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262555 +++$+++ 262555 +++$+++ 2006-03-17 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.142656560E09 +++$+++ I have [[User:Finlay McWalter|Finlay McWalter]]'s user and [[User talk:Finlay McWalter|talk]] page on my watchlist, and when I went to check up on it, you were the last to make an edit to his talk. &mdash; +++$+++ :I have [[User:Finlay McWalter|Finlay McWalter]]'s user and [[User talk:Finlay McWalter|talk]] page on my watchlist, and when I went to check up on it, you were the last to make an edit to his talk. &mdash;[[User:Eternal Equinox|Eternal Equinox]] | [[User talk:Eternal Equinox|talk]] 20:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

87450 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-15 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.276656780E09 +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice -->  +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 19:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
87451 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87450 +++$+++ 87450 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.277170800E09 +++$+++ See [[WP:Verifiability]]: the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is ''verifiability'', not whether the article may be useful to someone. As [[WP:Notability]] explains, if something doesn't have coverage in independent reliable sources we shouldn't have an article on it, as there's no way of verifying the info is correct and [[WP:NPOV|neutral in tone]].  That's why the article on LiveGraph was recently deleted: see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/LiveGraph]].  +++$+++ :See [[WP:Verifiability]]: the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is ''verifiability'', not whether the article may be useful to someone. As [[WP:Notability]] explains, if something doesn't have coverage in independent reliable sources we shouldn't have an article on it, as there's no way of verifying the info is correct and [[WP:NPOV|neutral in tone]].  That's why the article on LiveGraph was recently deleted: see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiveGraph]]. [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 18:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
87452 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87450 +++$+++ 87450 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.277170800E09 +++$+++ I was assuming that list should only include software for which Wikipedia has a corresponding article, but i've just noticed that's not the case so i've undone that edit. My apologies. Regards,  +++$+++ :I was assuming that list should only include software for which Wikipedia has a corresponding article, but i've just noticed that's not the case so i've undone that edit. My apologies. Regards, [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 18:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

415 +++$+++ CL +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 415 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-19 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.295443020E09 +++$+++ Congratulations from me as well. Yet another excellent FA from Dave!  +++$+++ Congratulations from me as well. Yet another excellent FA from Dave! [[User:CL|CL]] <small>([[User talk:CL|T]] · [[Special:Contributions/CL|C]])</small> — 05:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
416 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 415 +++$+++ 415 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.295443500E09 +++$+++ Thanks, my only regret is that I couldn't find any free licensed pre-landslide photos of the town that were worth uploading.  +++$+++ :Thanks, my only regret is that I couldn't find any free licensed pre-landslide photos of the town that were worth uploading. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 05:25, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
417 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 415 +++$+++ 415 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.295443500E09 +++$+++ Thanks, glad you liked it.  +++$+++ :Thanks, glad you liked it. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 05:25, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

524704 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-07 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.197018600E09 +++$+++ (ec) You're quite right, Videmus omnia.  My ribbons and medals aren't special.  They give me respect for the real awards.  World War I, France: a shell landed in my grandfather's trench.  Ripped his right leg, lodged some fragments in his back.  Everyone else was hit even worse.  Nobody came to help them and nobody else could stand up.  So my grandfather started making his way toward the nearest field hospital.  On the way there an ambulance met him and he directed them to his trench, telling them he'd keep walking.  They went, but by then it was too late for the rest of his unit: all dead or dying  On the trip back the ambulance driver offered him a ride, and when he declined a second time they ordered him into the ambulance.  Just as he stepped into it a second shell landed, killing everyone else in the ambulance.  By some miracle my grandfather wasn't touched.  So he walked the rest of the two miles to the field hospital.  When a doctor finally saw him the doc asked how he had gotten there and thought it was a lie when my grandfather told the truth.  Not because so many other people had died around him that day, but because he shouldn't have been able to take ten steps on that leg. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ (ec) You're quite right, Videmus omnia.  My ribbons and medals aren't special.  They give me respect for the real awards.  World War I, France: a shell landed in my grandfather's trench.  Ripped his right leg, lodged some fragments in his back.  Everyone else was hit even worse.  Nobody came to help them and nobody else could stand up.  So my grandfather started making his way toward the nearest field hospital.  On the way there an ambulance met him and he directed them to his trench, telling them he'd keep walking.  They went, but by then it was too late for the rest of his unit: all dead or dying  On the trip back the ambulance driver offered him a ride, and when he declined a second time they ordered him into the ambulance.  Just as he stepped into it a second shell landed, killing everyone else in the ambulance.  By some miracle my grandfather wasn't touched.  So he walked the rest of the two miles to the field hospital.  When a doctor finally saw him the doc asked how he had gotten there and thought it was a lie when my grandfather told the truth.  Not because so many other people had died around him that day, but because he shouldn't have been able to take ten steps on that leg. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 01:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
524705 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524704 +++$+++ 524704 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.197019020E09 +++$+++ Impressive...my grandfather was 101st Airborne in the Big War, parachuted into Normandy, did Market Garden, was in Bastogne during the Bulge, and was in one of the first groups into the Eagle's Nest. But the only medal he came out of that war with was the WWII Victory Medal and the [[ruptured duck]]. (Luckily he wasn't wounded.) My Dad got his Heart at the [[Battle of Hue]] after taking four rounds from a LMG, but he never bragged about it. You're right, it's the deeds that count. But calling attention to your medals is ''gauche''. (Sorry, Mouse, for chatting on your talk page.)  +++$+++ :Impressive...my grandfather was 101st Airborne in the Big War, parachuted into Normandy, did Market Garden, was in Bastogne during the Bulge, and was in one of the first groups into the Eagle's Nest. But the only medal he came out of that war with was the WWII Victory Medal and the [[ruptured duck]]. (Luckily he wasn't wounded.) My Dad got his Heart at the [[Battle of Hue]] after taking four rounds from a LMG, but he never bragged about it. You're right, it's the deeds that count. But calling attention to your medals is ''gauche''. (Sorry, Mouse, for chatting on your talk page.) [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 01:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
524706 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.197019500E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Durova. I just realized that I am an irredeemable crusty old sergeant. And I used to swear I wouldn't be one of those guys. :) I didn't mean to jump on you about it.  +++$+++ :::Thanks, Durova. I just realized that I am an irredeemable crusty old sergeant. And I used to swear I wouldn't be one of those guys. :) I didn't mean to jump on you about it. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 01:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
524707 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.197019860E09 +++$+++ Everyone's a bit stressed lately.  And you're right about getting squat for some of the important stuff.  My unit saved 113 civilian lives.  I survived on four hours' sleep for a week helping save 112 of them.  Got zero for that; not a single news source even picked up the ship's press release. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::Everyone's a bit stressed lately.  And you're right about getting squat for some of the important stuff.  My unit saved 113 civilian lives.  I survived on four hours' sleep for a week helping save 112 of them.  Got zero for that; not a single news source even picked up the ship's press release. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 01:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
524708 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.197021540E09 +++$+++ Heh - you'll die of old age waiting for the American press to report positively on the military. If you want to be in the papers, you need to force prisoners to wear panties on their heads.  +++$+++ :::::Heh - you'll die of old age waiting for the American press to report positively on the military. If you want to be in the papers, you need to force prisoners to wear panties on their heads. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 01:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
524709 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.197022860E09 +++$+++ Not funny.  The next summer I was toting an M14 at oh-dark-thirty while moored to the pier of a Muslim country and Abu Ghraib made worldwide headlines.  A small boy gets one topside rover.  If someone had targeted us the way they hit the Cole, it would have been my job to stop them.  And if they had small arms then taking me out would have been top priority.  I volunteered to stand double my normal rotation of armed watches during that time.  And I'm very grateful I never needed to use that weapon. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::::Not funny.  The next summer I was toting an M14 at oh-dark-thirty while moored to the pier of a Muslim country and Abu Ghraib made worldwide headlines.  A small boy gets one topside rover.  If someone had targeted us the way they hit the Cole, it would have been my job to stop them.  And if they had small arms then taking me out would have been top priority.  I volunteered to stand double my normal rotation of armed watches during that time.  And I'm very grateful I never needed to use that weapon. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 02:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
524710 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.197023280E09 +++$+++ We've all done time in the sandland and we've all taken risks, it comes with the oath and the suit. I've had my hairy moments too, and we've always joked and laughed about it in the squadron or at the club later - it helps. Dwelling on that stuff and taking it too seriously is a sure route to the bottle and the divorce lawyer. Lighten up.  +++$+++ :::::::We've all done time in the sandland and we've all taken risks, it comes with the oath and the suit. I've had my hairy moments too, and we've always joked and laughed about it in the squadron or at the club later - it helps. Dwelling on that stuff and taking it too seriously is a sure route to the bottle and the divorce lawyer. Lighten up. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 02:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
524711 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.197024300E09 +++$+++ I joined for a different reason from most of the crew.  My family was almost killed on 9\/11.  [[User:Durova\/Recusal]] - It's just not the same for me. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::::::I joined for a different reason from most of the crew.  My family was almost killed on 9/11.  [[User:Durova/Recusal]] - It's just not the same for me. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 02:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
524712 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.197025080E09 +++$+++ <s>Hmmm - I joined to fight the [[Cold War|Evil Empire]] and have stuck around an extra couple of decades. Are you still in uniform? [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk<\/sup> ]] 02:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)<\/s> I'm grateful for anyone's service, whether it's for one year or thirty, whatever the reason. If you want to continue the conversation, we should take it to e-mail or something rather than bothering AnonEMouse and taking up space on the Foundation's servers. With respect -  +++$+++ :::::::::<s>Hmmm - I joined to fight the [[Cold War|Evil Empire]] and have stuck around an extra couple of decades. Are you still in uniform? [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 02:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)</s> I'm grateful for anyone's service, whether it's for one year or thirty, whatever the reason. If you want to continue the conversation, we should take it to e-mail or something rather than bothering AnonEMouse and taking up space on the Foundation's servers. With respect - [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 02:58, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

262561 +++$+++ Midgley +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-07 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.144469640E09 +++$+++ May I solicit your assistance on that page which still contins the Kennedy\/China quote as a reference?  I could copy your work form the autism epidemic talk page but it is your work and I don't want to write everything in the other article.  One simple use of the (Incidence) article would be to drop it straight into the space left after removing the whole text of the (Epidemic) article, renaming and so on to bring the edit histories together.  Anotehr would be to nuke the old article from orbit, of course.  It matters rather less than leaving a useful article to WP standard behind.  +++$+++ May I solicit your assistance on that page which still contins the Kennedy/China quote as a reference?  I could copy your work form the autism epidemic talk page but it is your work and I don't want to write everything in the other article.  One simple use of the (Incidence) article would be to drop it straight into the space left after removing the whole text of the (Epidemic) article, renaming and so on to bring the edit histories together.  Anotehr would be to nuke the old article from orbit, of course.  It matters rather less than leaving a useful article to WP standard behind. [[User:Midgley|Midgley]] 21:14, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
262562 +++$+++ Ikkyu2 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262561 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.145604720E09 +++$+++ Well, it can't be ''completely'' different, as oxcarbazepine is the major hepatic metabolite of carbamazepine; therefore, anyone taking carbamazepine has a large amount of oxcarbazepine floating around in their system at any given time.  Still, those papers are interesting; I will give them a closer look soon.  --<font color=\"#2000C0\"> +++$+++ ::Well, it can't be ''completely'' different, as oxcarbazepine is the major hepatic metabolite of carbamazepine; therefore, anyone taking carbamazepine has a large amount of oxcarbazepine floating around in their system at any given time.  Still, those papers are interesting; I will give them a closer look soon.  --<font color="#2000C0">[[User:Ikkyu2|ikkyu2]]</font> (<font color="#00FF00">[[User_talk:Ikkyu2|talk]]</font>) 00:32, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
262563 +++$+++ Ikkyu2 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262561 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.157107680E09 +++$+++ Colin, I wasn't accurate; although oxcarb is structurally related to the major metabolite of carbamazepine, it's not identical with it.  I am finding, however, that in patients, its side effect profile and, more importantly, spectrum of efficacy is roughly the same as carbamazepine.  Its major benefit to me appears to be that it lacks the vigorous induction of the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme responsible for its metabolism that carbamazepine has; this \"autoinduction\" makes it difficult to regulate a person's carbamazepine level, and causes tricky interactions with other anticonvulsants as well.  -<font color=\"#2000C0\"> +++$+++ :::Colin, I wasn't accurate; although oxcarb is structurally related to the major metabolite of carbamazepine, it's not identical with it.  I am finding, however, that in patients, its side effect profile and, more importantly, spectrum of efficacy is roughly the same as carbamazepine.  Its major benefit to me appears to be that it lacks the vigorous induction of the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme responsible for its metabolism that carbamazepine has; this "autoinduction" makes it difficult to regulate a person's carbamazepine level, and causes tricky interactions with other anticonvulsants as well.  -<font color="#2000C0">[[User:Ikkyu2|ikkyu2]]</font> (<font color="#00FF00">[[User_talk:Ikkyu2|talk]]</font>) 03:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
262564 +++$+++ Ikkyu2 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262561 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.145604840E09 +++$+++ Ovation Pharmaceuticals just picked up vigabatrin and submitted it to the FDA.  This will be very good for all my patients with TS-associated spasms, as they can quit buying the vigabatrin I prescribe from Canadian mail-order pharmacies.  :)  --<font color=\"#2000C0\"> +++$+++ ::Ovation Pharmaceuticals just picked up vigabatrin and submitted it to the FDA.  This will be very good for all my patients with TS-associated spasms, as they can quit buying the vigabatrin I prescribe from Canadian mail-order pharmacies.  :)  --<font color="#2000C0">[[User:Ikkyu2|ikkyu2]]</font> (<font color="#00FF00">[[User_talk:Ikkyu2|talk]]</font>) 00:34, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

418 +++$+++ TomasBat +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-19 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.295495640E09 +++$+++ <\/div> <font color=\"purple\">\u2660<\/font> +++$+++ </div> <font color="purple">♠</font>[[User:TomasBat|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">TomasBat</font></font>]] 19:54, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
419 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 418 +++$+++ 418 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.295503920E09 +++$+++ Thanks.   +++$+++ :Thanks.  [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 22:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

537708 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-27 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.172623020E09 +++$+++ Well, actually there is something in which you could help (never offer help; people may actually take advantage of it! ;-)). I've noted that you've became, like me, a member of [[WP:LIBYA]], so you may be interested in some articles I've been working on that involve Chadian-Libyan relations ([[Chadian-Libyan conflict]], [[Toyota War]], [[Op\xe9ration Manta]]). If you've any time to lose giving a look at one or more of these, would you give me your opinion (brutal criticism is especially appreciated)? Ciao, and congratulations.-- +++$+++ Well, actually there is something in which you could help (never offer help; people may actually take advantage of it! ;-)). I've noted that you've became, like me, a member of [[WP:LIBYA]], so you may be interested in some articles I've been working on that involve Chadian-Libyan relations ([[Chadian-Libyan conflict]], [[Toyota War]], [[Opération Manta]]). If you've any time to lose giving a look at one or more of these, would you give me your opinion (brutal criticism is especially appreciated)? Ciao, and congratulations.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
537709 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537708 +++$+++ 537708 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.172624100E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux. Thanks and yes, you are somehow right :) Well, my main work as a coordinator will be focusing on everything related to Africa military history and obviously the Chadian-Libyan conflict would be part of it. I'll read them carefully and give you a summary. -- '' +++$+++ :Hi Aldux. Thanks and yes, you are somehow right :) Well, my main work as a coordinator will be focusing on everything related to Africa military history and obviously the Chadian-Libyan conflict would be part of it. I'll read them carefully and give you a summary. -- ''[[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]]'' - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up ®''</sup></font>]]</small> 16:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
537710 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537708 +++$+++ 537709 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.172626080E09 +++$+++ ''Chadian-Libyan conflict'' - The lead is very short. I am thinking of adding some background info to it. The section titles (i.e. ''The insurgency expands'', ''Libyan difficulties'') seem a bit more journalistic than encyclopaedic. Excellent notes and references. -- '' +++$+++ :*''Chadian-Libyan conflict'' - The lead is very short. I am thinking of adding some background info to it. The section titles (i.e. ''The insurgency expands'', ''Libyan difficulties'') seem a bit more journalistic than encyclopaedic. Excellent notes and references. -- ''[[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]]'' - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up ®''</sup></font>]]</small> 17:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
537711 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537708 +++$+++ 537709 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.172628960E09 +++$+++ I haven't written the lead, telling the truth; I probably should also add an \"aftermath\" section. As for the titles of the sections you're right; I've never been any good at writing them. Thanks for the hints you've gave me! Ciao,-- +++$+++ ::I haven't written the lead, telling the truth; I probably should also add an "aftermath" section. As for the titles of the sections you're right; I've never been any good at writing them. Thanks for the hints you've gave me! Ciao,--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 18:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

420 +++$+++ NortyNort +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-24 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.295865120E09 +++$+++ Hey Moabdave, per the conversation [[User_talk:Laser_brain#FAC_advice|on Laser Brain's talk page]], he suggested you might be interested in looking at the[[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/Grand_Coulee_Dam\/archive1#Grand_Coulee_Dam|Grand Coulee Dam FAC]] as it is infrastructure-related. Any comments or insight would be much appreciated. Thanks.-- +++$+++ Hey Moabdave, per the conversation [[User_talk:Laser_brain#FAC_advice|on Laser Brain's talk page]], he suggested you might be interested in looking at the[[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Grand_Coulee_Dam/archive1#Grand_Coulee_Dam|Grand Coulee Dam FAC]] as it is infrastructure-related. Any comments or insight would be much appreciated. Thanks.--[[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]]  <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 02:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
421 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 420 +++$+++ 420 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.295875320E09 +++$+++ Sure, I can take a look. How much time do I have? I'm a little busy tonight, but should be able to find time this week. Also, I can give it a review about completeness, flow, technical details, etc. but I'm not the best person to ask about spelling and grammar. I'm a rather sloppy writer.  +++$+++ :Sure, I can take a look. How much time do I have? I'm a little busy tonight, but should be able to find time this week. Also, I can give it a review about completeness, flow, technical details, etc. but I'm not the best person to ask about spelling and grammar. I'm a rather sloppy writer. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 05:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
422 +++$+++ NortyNort +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 420 +++$+++ 421 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.295887260E09 +++$+++ This week would be great, I leave next Monday and can have time over the weekend to edit out any issues. Anything in the article that you feel doesn't meet FA-criteria I assume. The technical stuff, completeness, flow, etc. sound good. Thanks again.-- +++$+++ ::This week would be great, I leave next Monday and can have time over the weekend to edit out any issues. Anything in the article that you feel doesn't meet FA-criteria I assume. The technical stuff, completeness, flow, etc. sound good. Thanks again.--[[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]]  <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 08:41, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
423 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 420 +++$+++ 422 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.296002520E09 +++$+++ FYI, I started a review last night. I'm about 1\/2 way through the article. I'll upload my comments when done. In the interim, so far it's a very good article but the wording is quite wordy. I'll have some suggestions on how to trim the article a bit shortly.  +++$+++ :::FYI, I started a review last night. I'm about 1/2 way through the article. I'll upload my comments when done. In the interim, so far it's a very good article but the wording is quite wordy. I'll have some suggestions on how to trim the article a bit shortly. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 16:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
424 +++$+++ NortyNort +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 420 +++$+++ 423 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.296022140E09 +++$+++ I ''tried'' to keep some areas short but I can be verbose. I look forward to you comments. Thanks.-- +++$+++ ::::I ''tried'' to keep some areas short but I can be verbose. I look forward to you comments. Thanks.--[[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]]  <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 22:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
425 +++$+++ NortyNort +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 420 +++$+++ 424 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.296073140E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for the comments! I agreed with all of them, made edits and responded on the FAC page.-- +++$+++ :::::Many thanks for the comments! I agreed with all of them, made edits and responded on the FAC page.--[[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]]  <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 12:19, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

453924 +++$+++ SWAdair +++$+++ Benc +++$+++ 453924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-10-10 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.097402340E09 +++$+++ I clicked Recent Changes and looked for an admin.  You were the first one I saw, so you get this question.  :-)  Would you check [[Typeparameter]] and see if you can make heads or tails of it.  I've never worked with templates here.  Should this be on meta or is it about something else entirely?  Thank you.   +++$+++ I clicked Recent Changes and looked for an admin.  You were the first one I saw, so you get this question.  :-)  Would you check [[Typeparameter]] and see if you can make heads or tails of it.  I've never worked with templates here.  Should this be on meta or is it about something else entirely?  Thank you.  [[User:SWAdair|SWAdair]] | [[User talk:SWAdair|Talk ]] 02:59, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
453925 +++$+++ SWAdair +++$+++ Benc +++$+++ 453924 +++$+++ 453924 +++$+++ 2004-10-10 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.097403420E09 +++$+++ Muuuuch better.  Thank you.   +++$+++ *Muuuuch better.  Thank you.  [[User:SWAdair|SWAdair]] | [[User talk:SWAdair|Talk ]] 03:17, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
453926 +++$+++ Benc +++$+++ Benc +++$+++ 453924 +++$+++ 453924 +++$+++ 2004-10-11 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.097505840E09 +++$+++ I'm sure you've seen this by now, but I've just finished a major edit at [[cross-dressing]] to help settle the Joan of Arc issue. I hope this will help; if there's anything that didn't help please let me know on [[Talk:Cross-dressing]].  +++$+++ :I'm sure you've seen this by now, but I've just finished a major edit at [[cross-dressing]] to help settle the Joan of Arc issue. I hope this will help; if there's anything that didn't help please let me know on [[Talk:Cross-dressing]]. [[User:Benc|&bull;&nbsp;Benc]][[User_talk:Benc|&nbsp;&bull;]] 07:44, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

262569 +++$+++ Stevouk +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262569 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-23 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.148423100E09 +++$+++ Can't honestly recall, to be honest. But I think it looked far too touristy anyway so I've wiped most of it. Usually if I need a lot of refs, dates etc, I'll cut and paste it from somewhere so I can build my own narrative around it. Possibly I forgot, but as I say, I'm not sure. -- +++$+++ Can't honestly recall, to be honest. But I think it looked far too touristy anyway so I've wiped most of it. Usually if I need a lot of refs, dates etc, I'll cut and paste it from somewhere so I can build my own narrative around it. Possibly I forgot, but as I say, I'm not sure. --[[User:Stevouk|Stevouk]] 15:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
262570 +++$+++ Morhange +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262569 +++$+++ 262569 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.148602740E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/nl.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Erik_van_Zweden This is the Dutch version of Erik's page and it mentions him being an epileptic.  +++$+++ *http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_van_Zweden This is the Dutch version of Erik's page and it mentions him being an epileptic. [[User:Morhange|Morhange]] 17:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

426 +++$+++ Rschen7754 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-16 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.305529560E09 +++$+++ I drove down there last night, and it's still plainly signed as SR 15. --''' +++$+++ I drove down there last night, and it's still plainly signed as SR 15. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 00:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
427 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 426 +++$+++ 426 +++$+++ 2011-05-16 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.305545040E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Things seem to have stabilized now anyways. Let's hope the matter is settled.  +++$+++ :Thanks. Things seem to have stabilized now anyways. Let's hope the matter is settled. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 04:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

262571 +++$+++ Sarranduin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-13 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.150242780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for kicking me into action again. --  +++$+++ Thanks for kicking me into action again. -- [[User:Sarranduin|Sarranduin]]<sup>([[User talk:Sarranduin|Talk]])</sup> 16:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
262572 +++$+++ Sarranduin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262571 +++$+++ 262571 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.150925340E09 +++$+++ I feel I might be in over my head regarding the proper formatting. For example, I reduced the size of the headings because \"it looked better\" with the shorter article, but obviously this is a deviation from the standard.... Please feel free to change whatever is necessary. Thanks again,  +++$+++ :I feel I might be in over my head regarding the proper formatting. For example, I reduced the size of the headings because "it looked better" with the shorter article, but obviously this is a deviation from the standard.... Please feel free to change whatever is necessary. Thanks again, [[User:Sarranduin|Sarranduin]]<sup>([[User talk:Sarranduin|Talk]])</sup> 14:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
262573 +++$+++ Sarranduin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262571 +++$+++ 262572 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.150939980E09 +++$+++ Ah, I made several late night edits that I have come to regret. Sorry for taking your time with having to \u201cdeal\u201d with me. I plan on working on the high-profile assistance dog organizations- putting more info on [[Canine Companions for Independence]] for example, and creating articles for the International Association of Assistance Dog Partners, Paws With A Cause, The Seeing Eye, and other organizations people might want more information on. Also, Assistance Dogs International has a large directory of member organizations [http:\/\/www.adionline.org\/MemberDirectory\/membership_directory.htm1.htm here], so I think working that link into what already exists would be a better solution (I seem to be having more and more \"duh\" moments the more I communicate with you). --  +++$+++ ::Ah, I made several late night edits that I have come to regret. Sorry for taking your time with having to “deal” with me. I plan on working on the high-profile assistance dog organizations- putting more info on [[Canine Companions for Independence]] for example, and creating articles for the International Association of Assistance Dog Partners, Paws With A Cause, The Seeing Eye, and other organizations people might want more information on. Also, Assistance Dogs International has a large directory of member organizations [http://www.adionline.org/MemberDirectory/membership_directory.htm1.htm here], so I think working that link into what already exists would be a better solution (I seem to be having more and more "duh" moments the more I communicate with you). -- [[User:Sarranduin|Sarranduin]]<sup>([[User talk:Sarranduin|Talk]])</sup> 18:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

428 +++$+++ Fredddie +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-19 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.305869040E09 +++$+++ After reading your post on [[WT:USRD]], I got an idea.  You should create a subpage somewhere, either at the task force or in your userspace.  Then, when you get time, just write down a couple thoughts or ideas.  Eventually, and with a little pruning here and there, there will be a list of stuff that you feel is important enough to cover. &ndash; +++$+++ After reading your post on [[WT:USRD]], I got an idea.  You should create a subpage somewhere, either at the task force or in your userspace.  Then, when you get time, just write down a couple thoughts or ideas.  Eventually, and with a little pruning here and there, there will be a list of stuff that you feel is important enough to cover. &ndash;[[User:Fredddie|Fredddie]][[User talk:Fredddie|™]] 22:24, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
429 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 428 +++$+++ 428 +++$+++ 2011-05-20 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.305938940E09 +++$+++ That is a good idea. I will have a better idea of my time constraints in about two weeks. If you don't mind, I'd like to put this off until then. However, I won't forget it.  +++$+++ :That is a good idea. I will have a better idea of my time constraints in about two weeks. If you don't mind, I'd like to put this off until then. However, I won't forget it. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 17:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

430 +++$+++ Rschen7754 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-05 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.307287800E09 +++$+++ Ping. --''' +++$+++ Ping. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 08:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
431 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 430 +++$+++ 430 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.307443740E09 +++$+++ Pong. Wow, nice to see this is finally being taken seriously. Any specific issue you would like me to respond? or just to keep an eye on the development of the guideline?  +++$+++ :Pong. Wow, nice to see this is finally being taken seriously. Any specific issue you would like me to respond? or just to keep an eye on the development of the guideline? [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 03:49, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
432 +++$+++ Rschen7754 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 430 +++$+++ 431 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.307444160E09 +++$+++ Yeah, just keep an eye on it. [[WT:OR]] has the relevant discussion. --''' +++$+++ ::Yeah, just keep an eye on it. [[WT:OR]] has the relevant discussion. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 03:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
433 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 430 +++$+++ 432 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.307445240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for telling me this discussion is taking place. I'm on the road now, but will try to respond as time permits.  +++$+++ :::Thanks for telling me this discussion is taking place. I'm on the road now, but will try to respond as time permits. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 04:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

524720 +++$+++ Masterpiece2000 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-09 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.197234120E09 +++$+++ Hello AnonEMouse. Do you remember me? I have a problem. How can I download an image on Wikipedia? Let's say I want to download an image of a sociology professor. How can I do that? Please reply on my talk page. Regards,  +++$+++ Hello AnonEMouse. Do you remember me? I have a problem. How can I download an image on Wikipedia? Let's say I want to download an image of a sociology professor. How can I do that? Please reply on my talk page. Regards, [[User:Masterpiece2000|Masterpiece2000]] ([[User talk:Masterpiece2000|talk]]) 13:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
524721 +++$+++ Masterpiece2000 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524720 +++$+++ 524720 +++$+++ 2007-12-11 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.197369900E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the reply. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thank you for the reply. Regards, [[User:Masterpiece2000|Masterpiece2000]] ([[User talk:Masterpiece2000|talk]]) 02:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

393288 +++$+++ Nick Garvey +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-05 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.178423340E09 +++$+++ I have added a \"{{[[Template:prod|prod]]}}\" template to the article [[Southern Cayuga High School]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also \"[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]\" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]).  You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}<\/nowiki><\/code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Southern Cayuga High School|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  +++$+++ I have added a "{{[[Template:prod|prod]]}}" template to the article [[Southern Cayuga High School]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]).  You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Southern Cayuga High School|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. [[User:Nick Garvey|Nick Garvey]] 20:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
393289 +++$+++ Nick Garvey +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393288 +++$+++ 393288 +++$+++ 2007-05-10 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.178853480E09 +++$+++ I noticed you removed the <nowiki>{{prod}}<\/nowiki> tab.  Do you plan on improving the article?  I don't see how it meets WP:N at all.  If you don't plan on improving it, I'm unsure why you removed the tag.   +++$+++ :I noticed you removed the <nowiki>{{prod}}</nowiki> tab.  Do you plan on improving the article?  I don't see how it meets WP:N at all.  If you don't plan on improving it, I'm unsure why you removed the tag.  [[User:Nick Garvey|Nick Garvey]] 20:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
393290 +++$+++ Nick Garvey +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393288 +++$+++ 393289 +++$+++ 2007-05-11 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.178935080E09 +++$+++ I don't mean to be a constant bother.. but I still can't see anything that meets [[WP:N]].  I'm probably going to open an AfD discussion shortly if there still isn't, just figured I'd give you the heads up, don't want you to lose all your work if you can meet WP:N. +++$+++ ::I don't mean to be a constant bother.. but I still can't see anything that meets [[WP:N]].  I'm probably going to open an AfD discussion shortly if there still isn't, just figured I'd give you the heads up, don't want you to lose all your work if you can meet WP:N.[[User:Nick Garvey|Nick Garvey]] 18:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
393291 +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393288 +++$+++ 393290 +++$+++ 2007-05-11 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.178949780E09 +++$+++ You might be able to kill off this one. Actually I don't enjoy making articles about random high schools but I can make if more necessary.  +++$+++ :::You might be able to kill off this one. Actually I don't enjoy making articles about random high schools but I can make if more necessary. [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 23:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
393292 +++$+++ Sambc +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393288 +++$+++ 393291 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.184619540E09 +++$+++ I don't mean to be insulting, and I guess I'm being bold, if not in the usual sense, but aren't you implying exactly the behaviour advised against in [[WP:POINT]]?  +++$+++ ::::I don't mean to be insulting, and I guess I'm being bold, if not in the usual sense, but aren't you implying exactly the behaviour advised against in [[WP:POINT]]? [[User:Sambc|SamBC]] 13:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
393293 +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393288 +++$+++ 393292 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.184628240E09 +++$+++ I don't believe improving wikipedia's coverage of high schools to be disruptive.  +++$+++ :::::I don't believe improving wikipedia's coverage of high schools to be disruptive. [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 16:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
393294 +++$+++ Sambc +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393288 +++$+++ 393293 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.184636100E09 +++$+++ I think it's still clearly not the best way to make this point. There should be some sort of central discussion. If you think there should be a policy describing consensus that all high schools (or equivalent designations in other countries) are notable, draft one and propose it. At the moment, there does not seem to be any such policy (or, afaict, consensus). Don't get me wrong, I have a lot of respect for you and your views, even if I disagree with them; I just want to see this resolved in a less messy fashion.  +++$+++ ::::::I think it's still clearly not the best way to make this point. There should be some sort of central discussion. If you think there should be a policy describing consensus that all high schools (or equivalent designations in other countries) are notable, draft one and propose it. At the moment, there does not seem to be any such policy (or, afaict, consensus). Don't get me wrong, I have a lot of respect for you and your views, even if I disagree with them; I just want to see this resolved in a less messy fashion. [[User:Sambc|SamBC]] 18:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

434 +++$+++ Ntsimp +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-13 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.307953260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding Tie Fork Rest Area to [[Tucker, Utah]]. I especially like the photo. I wasn't able to stop when I passed that way myself a couple of weeks ago. Well done!  +++$+++ Thanks for adding Tie Fork Rest Area to [[Tucker, Utah]]. I especially like the photo. I wasn't able to stop when I passed that way myself a couple of weeks ago. Well done! [[User:Ntsimp|Ntsimp]] ([[User talk:Ntsimp|talk]]) 01:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
435 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 434 +++$+++ 434 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.307954460E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I've been feeling burned out as of late, so it's great to hear I'm actually doing some good around here. =-)  +++$+++ :Thank you. I've been feeling burned out as of late, so it's great to hear I'm actually doing some good around here. =-) [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 01:41, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

262579 +++$+++ Rune.welsh +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-11 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.155329220E09 +++$+++ I've been reading your comments around the pages you listed on my talk page. Just wanted to let you know I'm thinking over the subject and that you can expect my contribution the discussion sometime this weekend. Regards -- [[User:Rune.welsh|Run]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"#339900\">e<\/font>]]  +++$+++ I've been reading your comments around the pages you listed on my talk page. Just wanted to let you know I'm thinking over the subject and that you can expect my contribution the discussion sometime this weekend. Regards -- [[User:Rune.welsh|Run]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="#339900">e</font>]] [[User:Rune.welsh|Welsh]] | [[User_talk:Rune.welsh|&tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa;]] 13:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
262580 +++$+++ Renata3 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262579 +++$+++ 262579 +++$+++ 2006-08-15 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.155628980E09 +++$+++ Certainly good additions! But in any case you would have to re-nominate because you are running out of time and you have no support votes as of yet... One thing I would change is \"Life\" column width so that the dates don't break into two lines. Also I am a bit uneasy that you rely on ref 72 so much. Otherwise it looks like something I might support.  +++$+++ :Certainly good additions! But in any case you would have to re-nominate because you are running out of time and you have no support votes as of yet... One thing I would change is "Life" column width so that the dates don't break into two lines. Also I am a bit uneasy that you rely on ref 72 so much. Otherwise it looks like something I might support. [[User:Renata3|Renata]] 01:03, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

438 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-01 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.309565820E09 +++$+++ Dave, the image sizes are fine forced up. The rules changed more than a year ago at MoS and IUP. It's up to you, but I'd be surprised if you found the small images better than the 240s. What kind of monitor\/window size\/browser are you on?  +++$+++ Dave, the image sizes are fine forced up. The rules changed more than a year ago at MoS and IUP. It's up to you, but I'd be surprised if you found the small images better than the 240s. What kind of monitor/window size/browser are you on? [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 17:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
439 +++$+++ Imzadi1979 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 438 +++$+++ 438 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.309566540E09 +++$+++ About the only benefit to not forcing the image sizes is that if they aren't specified, individual editor's preferences kick in. I have mine set to specify 300px thumbnails from back before the default was changed last year. I've left it there, so your change actually increased the photos on my display (from 240px to 300px) but decreased it for non-editors (240px to 220px). <span style=\"background:#006B54; padding:2px;\" >''' +++$+++ :About the only benefit to not forcing the image sizes is that if they aren't specified, individual editor's preferences kick in. I have mine set to specify 300px thumbnails from back before the default was changed last year. I've left it there, so your change actually increased the photos on my display (from 240px to 300px) but decreased it for non-editors (240px to 220px). <span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px;" >'''[[User:Imzadi1979|<font color="white">Imzadi&nbsp;1979</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Imzadi1979|<font color="white"><big>→</big></font>]]'''</span>  17:29, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
440 +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 438 +++$+++ 439 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.309566780E09 +++$+++ I have no objections either way. For the record, I just check the MoS and it still says that in general image sizes should not be forced, but does allow for judgement. I don't have a strong preference either way, and won't object if you revert my changes.  +++$+++ ::I have no objections either way. For the record, I just check the MoS and it still says that in general image sizes should not be forced, but does allow for judgement. I don't have a strong preference either way, and won't object if you revert my changes. [[User:Moabdave|Dave]] ([[User talk:Moabdave#top|talk]]) 17:33, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

524727 +++$+++ Photouploaded +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-11 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.197419460E09 +++$+++ Regarding the order of the names, [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(biographies)#Pseudonyms.2C_stage_names_and_common_names|MOSBIO]] states that \"For people who are best known by a pseudonym, the legal name should usually appear first in the article, followed closely by the pseudonym. Follow this practice even if the article itself is titled with the pseudonym...\".  I think it should be left as it is now.   +++$+++ Regarding the order of the names, [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(biographies)#Pseudonyms.2C_stage_names_and_common_names|MOSBIO]] states that "For people who are best known by a pseudonym, the legal name should usually appear first in the article, followed closely by the pseudonym. Follow this practice even if the article itself is titled with the pseudonym...".  I think it should be left as it is now.  [[User:Photouploaded|Photouploaded]] ([[User talk:Photouploaded|talk]]) 16:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
524728 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524727 +++$+++ 524727 +++$+++ 2007-12-11 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.197420420E09 +++$+++ It actually then goes on to say the other way around is also acceptable. But not a big deal. -- +++$+++ : It actually then goes on to say the other way around is also acceptable. But not a big deal. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
524729 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524727 +++$+++ 524727 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.197510660E09 +++$+++ You're welcome; thank you for doing a good job writing it. It really is much better than the average article we have, and if you fix those points you may want to nom it for FA. Personally, I would have written the same criticism if it had been nominated for FA - I find it difficult to differentiate between the two levels of quality many times. The main differences between GA and FA as far as I can tell are that for GA you need to satisfy one reviewer, and for FA, many, who will look at different issues. Best of luck. -- +++$+++ : You're welcome; thank you for doing a good job writing it. It really is much better than the average article we have, and if you fix those points you may want to nom it for FA. Personally, I would have written the same criticism if it had been nominated for FA - I find it difficult to differentiate between the two levels of quality many times. The main differences between GA and FA as far as I can tell are that for GA you need to satisfy one reviewer, and for FA, many, who will look at different issues. Best of luck. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

441 +++$+++ Mike_Searson +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.311133680E09 +++$+++ I'll make a quick runthrough it...I agree much had to go, but they took too much.-- +++$+++ I'll make a quick runthrough it...I agree much had to go, but they took too much.--[[User:Mike Searson|'''Mike''']] - [[User_talk:Mike_Searson|'''Μολὼν λαβέ''']] 20:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
442 +++$+++ Mike_Searson +++$+++ Moabdave +++$+++ 441 +++$+++ 441 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.311206820E09 +++$+++ Go for it!  I'll keep out of it for a while.  Any thoughts on splitting out the movies filmed there or that list of songs, etc into another article?  I've done it with a handful of Martial Arts related articles (Eskrima, Muay Thai, etc) where the lists of movies where the art was used was outweighing the article about the Art, itself.-- +++$+++ :Go for it!  I'll keep out of it for a while.  Any thoughts on splitting out the movies filmed there or that list of songs, etc into another article?  I've done it with a handful of Martial Arts related articles (Eskrima, Muay Thai, etc) where the lists of movies where the art was used was outweighing the article about the Art, itself.--[[User:Mike Searson|'''Mike''']] - [[User_talk:Mike_Searson|'''Μολὼν λαβέ''']] 17:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

524730 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-12 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.197512280E09 +++$+++ Hi, AnonEMouse. There's a little controversy brewing on my talk page involving an editor who is removing some sourcing of mine... You may have noticed, I often add sources to articles, even ones I don't edit, when I come across a good source on some relatively obscure subject. Once in a while someone objects to this, and I have to admit, I am totally flabbergasted by it. \"Hey! Stop sourcing my article!\" Especially on poorly- or completly non-sourced articles? WTF? Am I wrong?  +++$+++ Hi, AnonEMouse. There's a little controversy brewing on my talk page involving an editor who is removing some sourcing of mine... You may have noticed, I often add sources to articles, even ones I don't edit, when I come across a good source on some relatively obscure subject. Once in a while someone objects to this, and I have to admit, I am totally flabbergasted by it. "Hey! Stop sourcing my article!" Especially on poorly- or completly non-sourced articles? WTF? Am I wrong? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 18:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
524731 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524730 +++$+++ 524730 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.197513480E09 +++$+++ Ah, I think I see the problem. [[June Wilkinson]]? I think the issue is that the article doesn't actually use that interview to back any facts, so it's not really a Source as such. It would still be a fine External link, except it's not actually a link. It seems to be a note as to where to look for further reading. Let's what [[WP:MOS]] says - ah, here. [[WP:MOS#Section management]]. You can call it ''Further reading'' (or ''Bibliography'') and it should be fine until you have the time to turn it into a reference. If it comes up again, drop me a line. -- +++$+++ : Ah, I think I see the problem. [[June Wilkinson]]? I think the issue is that the article doesn't actually use that interview to back any facts, so it's not really a Source as such. It would still be a fine External link, except it's not actually a link. It seems to be a note as to where to look for further reading. Let's what [[WP:MOS]] says - ah, here. [[WP:MOS#Section management]]. You can call it ''Further reading'' (or ''Bibliography'') and it should be fine until you have the time to turn it into a reference. If it comes up again, drop me a line. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:38, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
524732 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524730 +++$+++ 524731 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.197513840E09 +++$+++ Ah, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Rabbit_Seasoning#.22Pronoun_trouble.22 pronoun trouble]... I took \"Sources\" to mean \"Sources for information\" \"Sources on the subject\" rather than simply \"Sources used in putting this article together.\" OK-- Bibliography works fine. Probably the main reason I do this, anyway, is to show coverage of a relatively obscure subject which may later come up for deletion because of lack of sourcing. One would think the writers of these articles would be grateful for this... But then it seems that the \"Delete as unsourced\" rule is rather unevenly enforced... Grumble...  +++$+++ :: Ah, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbit_Seasoning#.22Pronoun_trouble.22 pronoun trouble]... I took "Sources" to mean "Sources for information" "Sources on the subject" rather than simply "Sources used in putting this article together." OK-- Bibliography works fine. Probably the main reason I do this, anyway, is to show coverage of a relatively obscure subject which may later come up for deletion because of lack of sourcing. One would think the writers of these articles would be grateful for this... But then it seems that the "Delete as unsourced" rule is rather unevenly enforced... Grumble... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 18:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

443 +++$+++ Ugen64 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 443 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-29 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.188452160E09 +++$+++ Please don't revert users on their own talkpages. Per [[Wikipedia:User page]], users are allowed to remove whatever they want from their user page, warnings or otherwise.  +++$+++ Please don't revert users on their own talkpages. Per [[Wikipedia:User page]], users are allowed to remove whatever they want from their user page, warnings or otherwise. [[User:Ugen64|ugen64]] 22:36, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
444 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 443 +++$+++ 443 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.188452280E09 +++$+++ Fine, alright.  +++$+++ :Fine, alright. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|walk]])</font> 22:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

445 +++$+++ GoodDay +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-04 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.188895860E09 +++$+++ Sorry 'bout the 'edit conflict'. I was so steamed with that article - I forgot to wait for you to complete the Afd nomination.  +++$+++ Sorry 'bout the 'edit conflict'. I was so steamed with that article - I forgot to wait for you to complete the Afd nomination. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] 01:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
446 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 445 +++$+++ 445 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.188895860E09 +++$+++ Oh, that's no problem.  +++$+++ :Oh, that's no problem. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|walk]])</font> 01:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

262591 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-10 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.160473200E09 +++$+++ Hi, I saw you made [[List of people with epilepsy]] a featured list. I just put up [[List of HIV-positive people]] for peer review [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/List of HIV-positive people|here]] and I was hoping you could have a look at the article and give me some critique.  +++$+++ Hi, I saw you made [[List of people with epilepsy]] a featured list. I just put up [[List of HIV-positive people]] for peer review [[Wikipedia:Peer review/List of HIV-positive people|here]] and I was hoping you could have a look at the article and give me some critique. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 02:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
262592 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262591 +++$+++ 262591 +++$+++ 2006-10-13 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.160738640E09 +++$+++ I think I addressed all your comments at the peer review. Please let me know what you think. Again thanks for a thorough review.  +++$+++ : I think I addressed all your comments at the peer review. Please let me know what you think. Again thanks for a thorough review. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 04:24, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
262593 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262591 +++$+++ 262592 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.161073020E09 +++$+++ It's on FLC now: [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/List of HIV-positive people]]. ''' +++$+++ ::It's on FLC now: [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of HIV-positive people]]. '''[[User:Durova|<font color="blue">Durova</font>]]''' 01:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

524737 +++$+++ Mafia Expert +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-15 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.197754680E09 +++$+++ The images [[:Image:Lo_Piccolo_photofit.jpg]] and [[:Image:Lo_Piccolo_arrest.jpg]] have been listed at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion\/2007 December 13#Image:Lo_Piccolo_photofit.jpg|discussion]]  (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. -  +++$+++ The images [[:Image:Lo_Piccolo_photofit.jpg]] and [[:Image:Lo_Piccolo_arrest.jpg]] have been listed at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 December 13#Image:Lo_Piccolo_photofit.jpg|discussion]]  (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. - [[User:Mafia Expert|Mafia Expert]] ([[User talk:Mafia Expert|talk]]) 13:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
524738 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524737 +++$+++ 524737 +++$+++ 2007-12-15 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.197764520E09 +++$+++ Er ... thanks, but I'm not sure why you think I'd be interested, I don't recall ever editing either image, or any related article. -- +++$+++ : Er ... thanks, but I'm not sure why you think I'd be interested, I don't recall ever editing either image, or any related article. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

451 +++$+++ Epbr123 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 451 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.196966340E09 +++$+++ Hi. I just wondered if you'd consider letting me nominate you for adminship, as I think you're experienced enough. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. I just wondered if you'd consider letting me nominate you for adminship, as I think you're experienced enough. Thanks. [[User:Epbr123|Epbr123]] ([[User talk:Epbr123|talk]]) 10:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
452 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 451 +++$+++ 451 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.196988480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the offer. I'm dealing with finals right now, though, so come back in about two weeks when I'll probably have a firm answer.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the offer. I'm dealing with finals right now, though, so come back in about two weeks when I'll probably have a firm answer. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|walk]])</font> 16:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

262598 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262598 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.161986940E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for the detailed and helpful comments: I knew those were weaknesses, but no one else complained :-)  Addressing those issues is on my list for this morning, but I keep getting distracted by new entries about those darn images and the infobox -- will get on them today, so check back later if you're interested.  Thanks again,  +++$+++ Thanks so much for the detailed and helpful comments: I knew those were weaknesses, but no one else complained :-)  Addressing those issues is on my list for this morning, but I keep getting distracted by new entries about those darn images and the infobox -- will get on them today, so check back later if you're interested.  Thanks again, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
262599 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262598 +++$+++ 262598 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.161997800E09 +++$+++ OK, made a lot of changes, in case you want to have another look.  Thanks again !   +++$+++ :OK, made a lot of changes, in case you want to have another look.  Thanks again !  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
262600 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262598 +++$+++ 262599 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.162063320E09 +++$+++ Yes, there is some confusion on the numbers :-)  Yomangani mentioned the problem of consistency in style, I read the MOS on numbers (perhaps incorrectly) and made changes to (I thought) to agree, Tony changed some of them back, and now I'm confused :-)  Your proposal sounds good:  I'll run it by Tony and Yomangani.  Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Yes, there is some confusion on the numbers :-)  Yomangani mentioned the problem of consistency in style, I read the MOS on numbers (perhaps incorrectly) and made changes to (I thought) to agree, Tony changed some of them back, and now I'm confused :-)  Your proposal sounds good:  I'll run it by Tony and Yomangani.  Thanks! [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 12:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

524744 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524744 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-19 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.198054320E09 +++$+++ Hi, Anon. What would a day at Wiki be without me asking for advice? Today the question is on: Korean erotic cinema. Articles such as ''[[Mulberry (film)|Mulberry]]'' and the brand new ''[[Madame Aema]]''-- They're definitely erotic film, but they're probably not pornographic. They did clearly exploited their sexual content for success. My question: Would it be appropriate to slap a \"Project Pornography\" tag on this sort of erotic cinema? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, Anon. What would a day at Wiki be without me asking for advice? Today the question is on: Korean erotic cinema. Articles such as ''[[Mulberry (film)|Mulberry]]'' and the brand new ''[[Madame Aema]]''-- They're definitely erotic film, but they're probably not pornographic. They did clearly exploited their sexual content for success. My question: Would it be appropriate to slap a "Project Pornography" tag on this sort of erotic cinema? Thanks. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 00:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
524745 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524744 +++$+++ 524744 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.198714500E09 +++$+++ Grr. You don't ask the easy questions, do you? :-) I'd say no, but I wish the articles described just how explicitly erotic these films were. [[Pornography]] is defined in our article as \"the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity with the goal of sexual arousal and\/or sexual relief.\" If the nudity or sex isn't explicitly presented on the screen, but just hinted at, it's not pornography by that definition, no matter how erotic it is. I haven't seen either of those two films so will have to use a different one for an example: have you seen ''[[Tampopo]]''? There is a scene there where a couple kiss to pass a raw egg back and forth until it breaks. Or if you haven't seen that, you've surely seen at least one of any number of videos of girls suggestively eating lollipops or bananas. That's all pretty clearly sexy, but all implicit, not explicit. -- +++$+++ : Grr. You don't ask the easy questions, do you? :-) I'd say no, but I wish the articles described just how explicitly erotic these films were. [[Pornography]] is defined in our article as "the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity with the goal of sexual arousal and/or sexual relief." If the nudity or sex isn't explicitly presented on the screen, but just hinted at, it's not pornography by that definition, no matter how erotic it is. I haven't seen either of those two films so will have to use a different one for an example: have you seen ''[[Tampopo]]''? There is a scene there where a couple kiss to pass a raw egg back and forth until it breaks. Or if you haven't seen that, you've surely seen at least one of any number of videos of girls suggestively eating lollipops or bananas. That's all pretty clearly sexy, but all implicit, not explicit. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
524746 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524744 +++$+++ 524745 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.198721400E09 +++$+++ On the other hand, of course being marked as of interest to the Wikiproject doesn't mean it is pornographic in itself - for example, several pornography-related supreme court cases aren't pornographic in themselves, yet highly important to the study of pornography.  If ''Mme Aena'' opened the door to films that clearly were pornographic, it would probably be of interest... Sigh. Can I cop out to \"use your best judgment\"? :-P -- +++$+++ :: On the other hand, of course being marked as of interest to the Wikiproject doesn't mean it is pornographic in itself - for example, several pornography-related supreme court cases aren't pornographic in themselves, yet highly important to the study of pornography.  If ''Mme Aena'' opened the door to films that clearly were pornographic, it would probably be of interest... Sigh. Can I cop out to "use your best judgment"? :-P --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
524747 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524744 +++$+++ 524746 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.198723440E09 +++$+++ Obviously, the ''[[Tampopo]]'' example is not porn. The scene you mention is erotic, certainly, though in no way pornographic. But I wouldn't even think about calling it an erotic film, much less porn. That would be like calling [[King Lear]] a comedy because the Fool cracks a few jokes. Anyway, I worked out a solution with a Korean editor-- We've decided Madame Aema is soft porn, Ppong is not. They both do show nudity and sexual activity, on screen. We've decided that since Madame Aema was made only to capitalize on the nudity and sexual activity, it fits in the project. Ppong is a literary adaptation of some artistic quality, and, basically, a sex-farce. (I'm still a little uncomfortable with the subjectivity of this decision, but so it goes...) Both get the \"Erotic film\" category though. Am I the only one who has difficulty with the Pornography label? It does seem a bit of a value-judgment, at least in my thinking... If something with nudity & strong sexuality is done very well, then it's not porn, it's erotic cinema. On the other hand, porn is porn and there's no mistaking it, if you get my drift.  +++$+++ ::: Obviously, the ''[[Tampopo]]'' example is not porn. The scene you mention is erotic, certainly, though in no way pornographic. But I wouldn't even think about calling it an erotic film, much less porn. That would be like calling [[King Lear]] a comedy because the Fool cracks a few jokes. Anyway, I worked out a solution with a Korean editor-- We've decided Madame Aema is soft porn, Ppong is not. They both do show nudity and sexual activity, on screen. We've decided that since Madame Aema was made only to capitalize on the nudity and sexual activity, it fits in the project. Ppong is a literary adaptation of some artistic quality, and, basically, a sex-farce. (I'm still a little uncomfortable with the subjectivity of this decision, but so it goes...) Both get the "Erotic film" category though. Am I the only one who has difficulty with the Pornography label? It does seem a bit of a value-judgment, at least in my thinking... If something with nudity & strong sexuality is done very well, then it's not porn, it's erotic cinema. On the other hand, porn is porn and there's no mistaking it, if you get my drift. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 18:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

262602 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-03 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.162589220E09 +++$+++ Colin, thanks so much for everything, and for following up with Jkelly.  I'm going to be traveling this week, and will have limited and sporadic internet access:  I'll catch up with the remaining list of loose ends to tie up at the end of next week (images, internet archive, dates and numbers), and look at MEDMOS when I have time.  Thanks again, your help has been invaluable,  +++$+++ Colin, thanks so much for everything, and for following up with Jkelly.  I'm going to be traveling this week, and will have limited and sporadic internet access:  I'll catch up with the remaining list of loose ends to tie up at the end of next week (images, internet archive, dates and numbers), and look at MEDMOS when I have time.  Thanks again, your help has been invaluable, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 13:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
262603 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262602 +++$+++ 262602 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163286360E09 +++$+++ Colin, I just wanted to let you know I'm still traveling, and lost track of what happened with the images (the Commons link on my talk page no longer works):  I'll catch up with you when I'm home.   +++$+++ :Colin, I just wanted to let you know I'm still traveling, and lost track of what happened with the images (the Commons link on my talk page no longer works):  I'll catch up with you when I'm home.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

262604 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.161991380E09 +++$+++ Colin, I just created a [[space-filling model]] of [[phenobarbital]] and intended to add to the article, but after a quick look at the skeletal structure currently in the Drugbox I'm worried the rotation on my image may be confusing. Would you mind [[:Image:Phenobarbital3d.png|having a look]]? Thanks in advance,  +++$+++ Colin, I just created a [[space-filling model]] of [[phenobarbital]] and intended to add to the article, but after a quick look at the skeletal structure currently in the Drugbox I'm worried the rotation on my image may be confusing. Would you mind [[:Image:Phenobarbital3d.png|having a look]]? Thanks in advance, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 16:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
262605 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262604 +++$+++ 262604 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.162017000E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that's what I meant. There is indeed a move to SVG (in fact, I upload all my structural diagrams as SVGs), and I could certainly create SVGs of the barbiturates all rotated the same way for comparison purposes. All barbiturate structures have [http:\/\/pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/image\/smi2gif.fcgi?header=&cid=4763&bgcolor=white&bondcolor=split&width=400&height=400 this] orientation on [[PubChem]] &ndash; do you think this would look good?  +++$+++ :Yeah, that's what I meant. There is indeed a move to SVG (in fact, I upload all my structural diagrams as SVGs), and I could certainly create SVGs of the barbiturates all rotated the same way for comparison purposes. All barbiturate structures have [http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/image/smi2gif.fcgi?header=&cid=4763&bgcolor=white&bondcolor=split&width=400&height=400 this] orientation on [[PubChem]] &ndash; do you think this would look good? [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 23:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
262606 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262604 +++$+++ 262605 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.162065240E09 +++$+++ I use [[Inkscape]]. It's free and pretty easy to get the hang of, although my methods probably aren't the most effective (sketch the molecule on ChemSketch, export to [[TIFF]], and than trace in Inkscape by hand). It takes a while longer than just exporting to PNG, but it makes for lighter files as well. I'm quite sure BKchem has native SVG support though, do you have the most recent version?<br>Anyway, I've had a look at all the barbiturate pages and the images are all very good, except for [[talbutal]] (it's a GIF and pretty non-standard). I don't think there's a need to \"remake\" all of them, I guess I'll just upload a better version of my space-filling model for phenobarbital. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::I use [[Inkscape]]. It's free and pretty easy to get the hang of, although my methods probably aren't the most effective (sketch the molecule on ChemSketch, export to [[TIFF]], and than trace in Inkscape by hand). It takes a while longer than just exporting to PNG, but it makes for lighter files as well. I'm quite sure BKchem has native SVG support though, do you have the most recent version?<br>Anyway, I've had a look at all the barbiturate pages and the images are all very good, except for [[talbutal]] (it's a GIF and pretty non-standard). I don't think there's a need to "remake" all of them, I guess I'll just upload a better version of my space-filling model for phenobarbital. Thanks, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 12:54, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
262607 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262604 +++$+++ 262606 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.162071720E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Phenobarbital3d_updated.png|Updated version]].  +++$+++ :::[[:Image:Phenobarbital3d_updated.png|Updated version]]. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 14:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
262608 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262604 +++$+++ 262606 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.162073160E09 +++$+++ Definitely worth it, I agree. I've added it to the article, and created an SVG for talbutal. Thanks again for your input! Best,  +++$+++ :::Definitely worth it, I agree. I've added it to the article, and created an SVG for talbutal. Thanks again for your input! Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 15:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
262609 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262604 +++$+++ 262608 +++$+++ 2006-10-30 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.162278780E09 +++$+++ I'll get to that soon, I was offline yesterday. I reduced the quality for faster rendering, I didn't think it would affect export quality as well... :(  +++$+++ ::::I'll get to that soon, I was offline yesterday. I reduced the quality for faster rendering, I didn't think it would affect export quality as well... :( [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 23:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

611746 +++$+++ Garyvdm +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-17 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.166399340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Garyvdm|Gary van der Merwe]] <sup>([[User_talk:Garyvdm|Talk]])</sup> 15:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
611747 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611746 +++$+++ 611746 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166401680E09 +++$+++ The page itself says, \"DO NOT CHANGE GENRE, see talk page.\" It could be because I'm stressed out that I'm a little more aggressive than usual, but I know, just as well as (almost) every other user here, that they see the notices. They just choose to ignore them. \/\/  +++$+++ :The page itself says, "DO NOT CHANGE GENRE, see talk page." It could be because I'm stressed out that I'm a little more aggressive than usual, but I know, just as well as (almost) every other user here, that they see the notices. They just choose to ignore them. // [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuke'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sasuke-kun27|<font color="purple">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 16:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

524750 +++$+++ Disavian +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524750 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-22 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.198393680E09 +++$+++ I nominated [[Louise Glover]] for GA, as you and other editors had IMO made it a high-quality article. I'd like your help in addressing the reviewer's concerns; see [[Talk:Louise Glover#GA Review]]. :) \u2014 +++$+++ I nominated [[Louise Glover]] for GA, as you and other editors had IMO made it a high-quality article. I'd like your help in addressing the reviewer's concerns; see [[Talk:Louise Glover#GA Review]]. :) —[[User:Disavian|Disavian]] ([[User talk:Disavian|<sup>talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Disavian|<sub>contribs</sub>]]) 23:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
524751 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524750 +++$+++ 524750 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.198736880E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I'm honored and unworthy! :-) I responded on\/in the article and talk page. -- +++$+++ : Thanks! I'm honored and unworthy! :-) I responded on/in the article and talk page. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 22:28, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

524753 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-25 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.198585740E09 +++$+++ Mouse, check out [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/kamui99\/ this Flickr user] - what's your gut feeling on the free license for the photos?  +++$+++ Mouse, check out [http://www.flickr.com/photos/kamui99/ this Flickr user] - what's your gut feeling on the free license for the photos? [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 04:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
524754 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524753 +++$+++ 524753 +++$+++ 2007-12-25 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.198635060E09 +++$+++ Actually, I checked again and am pretty suspicious. No camera metadata in most cases, the \"taken\" date is the same as the upload date, and pictures that are stated to be taken on the same date despite different appearances by the same model.  +++$+++ :Actually, I checked again and am pretty suspicious. No camera metadata in most cases, the "taken" date is the same as the upload date, and pictures that are stated to be taken on the same date despite different appearances by the same model. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 18:11, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
524755 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524753 +++$+++ 524754 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.198711920E09 +++$+++ Ahem. The infamous Kamui\/Kamui99\/Kamui Sendoh was my inspiration for creating [[Commons:Commons:Questionable Flickr images]], and bears a prominent role therein, no less than three links discussing him. Please take a look at that page, that's what it's for, and add any others there as well. In short - yes, it's ''highly'' questionable he owns the copyright to all of \"his\" images, enough so that I would recommend considering any of his images suspect. His heart is probably in the right place, as he has contributed to Wikipedia personally, but his stand on copyright is rather questionable. -- +++$+++ :: Ahem. The infamous Kamui/Kamui99/Kamui Sendoh was my inspiration for creating [[Commons:Commons:Questionable Flickr images]], and bears a prominent role therein, no less than three links discussing him. Please take a look at that page, that's what it's for, and add any others there as well. In short - yes, it's ''highly'' questionable he owns the copyright to all of "his" images, enough so that I would recommend considering any of his images suspect. His heart is probably in the right place, as he has contributed to Wikipedia personally, but his stand on copyright is rather questionable. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

524756 +++$+++ Canadian Paul +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-26 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.198685520E09 +++$+++ I have reviewed the article that you nominated for Good Article status, [[Karen McDougal]], and placed it on hold. You may view my comments and concerns on [[Talk:Karen McDougal|the article's talk page]]. Also, I notice that two articles that you have reviewed, [[Jaime King]] and [[Reel Affirmations]], have had their holds expired for some time now. Might I suggest passing, failing or extending the holds of the articles? Cheers,  +++$+++ I have reviewed the article that you nominated for Good Article status, [[Karen McDougal]], and placed it on hold. You may view my comments and concerns on [[Talk:Karen McDougal|the article's talk page]]. Also, I notice that two articles that you have reviewed, [[Jaime King]] and [[Reel Affirmations]], have had their holds expired for some time now. Might I suggest passing, failing or extending the holds of the articles? Cheers, [[User:Canadian Paul|CP]] 08:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
524757 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.198737000E09 +++$+++ Will do soon (prob. tomorrow), a lot of work has been done. -- +++$+++ :: Will do soon (prob. tomorrow), a lot of work has been done. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 22:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
524758 +++$+++ 76.199.65.126 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524756 +++$+++ 524756 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.198713960E09 +++$+++ I have assisted in adopting some of the edits recommended by  +++$+++ :I have assisted in adopting some of the edits recommended by [[User:Canadian Paul|CP]], but I need your help on points 1, 5 & 7. I personally believe the Playboy Cover and the XFL commercial cap should stay as the cover is her "pinnacle of career" and XFL commercial is still her only mainstream TV commercial appearance and most controversial work to date. I have been working on this article on and off, here and there for the past 1+ year and I think it needs a new perspective. Any help you can offer is much appreciated.  I am a fan of her and I certainly hope her article can become the first Playmate GA. Thanks for nominating. [[Special:Contributions/76.199.65.126|76.199.65.126]] ([[User talk:76.199.65.126|talk]]) 16:06, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
524759 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524756 +++$+++ 524758 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.198716060E09 +++$+++ No, thank ''you''; I noticed the excellent job someone who hasn't been logging in has been doing on the article. I think it's clearly better than the one of mine Disavian nominated above, for example. Give me a bit of time to do some cleanup, I've not edited in a while, and a lot of tasks have piled up in just a couple of weeks, but then I will certainly jump in and help. By the way, have you thought about getting a user account? It only has benefits, really. For one thing, I will be able to somehow think of you as other than ''strange string of numbers''. :-) -- +++$+++ :: No, thank ''you''; I noticed the excellent job someone who hasn't been logging in has been doing on the article. I think it's clearly better than the one of mine Disavian nominated above, for example. Give me a bit of time to do some cleanup, I've not edited in a while, and a lot of tasks have piled up in just a couple of weeks, but then I will certainly jump in and help. By the way, have you thought about getting a user account? It only has benefits, really. For one thing, I will be able to somehow think of you as other than ''strange string of numbers''. :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:41, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
524760 +++$+++ 76.199.65.126 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524756 +++$+++ 524759 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.198816380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for all the help so far.  I went back and tweak the personal paragraph a little bit more trying to make it tighter.  Please take a look. I am also okay with deleting the line with the painted swimsuit but I haven't deleted it yet.[[Special:Contributions\/76.199.65.126|76.199.65.126]] ( +++$+++ :::Thanks for all the help so far.  I went back and tweak the personal paragraph a little bit more trying to make it tighter.  Please take a look. I am also okay with deleting the line with the painted swimsuit but I haven't deleted it yet.[[Special:Contributions/76.199.65.126|76.199.65.126]] ([[User talk:76.199.65.126|talk]]) 20:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
524761 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524756 +++$+++ 524760 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.198816680E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. I noticed you sort of stuck all three \"Personal life\" paragraphs together. I thought that keeping them the way they were would be better, since that way, each had sort of a theme, while still being over the two sentences that CP doesn't seem to like for paragraphs: one was about her and her family, one was about her and motorcycles, and one was about her exercising and hobbies. -- +++$+++ :::: You're welcome. I noticed you sort of stuck all three "Personal life" paragraphs together. I thought that keeping them the way they were would be better, since that way, each had sort of a theme, while still being over the two sentences that CP doesn't seem to like for paragraphs: one was about her and her family, one was about her and motorcycles, and one was about her exercising and hobbies. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 20:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
524762 +++$+++ 76.199.65.126 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524756 +++$+++ 524761 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.198825080E09 +++$+++ No, thank YOU. I have unbundled the family portion of the paragraph. So now it talks about her first, then her family. I have also cited the calendar itself for the \"painted on\" issue. I am not sure if that would work, but I would at least try it before removing the line. [[Special:Contributions\/76.199.65.126|76.199.65.126]] ( +++$+++ :::::No, thank YOU. I have unbundled the family portion of the paragraph. So now it talks about her first, then her family. I have also cited the calendar itself for the "painted on" issue. I am not sure if that would work, but I would at least try it before removing the line. [[Special:Contributions/76.199.65.126|76.199.65.126]] ([[User talk:76.199.65.126|talk]]) 22:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
524763 +++$+++ 76.199.65.126 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524756 +++$+++ 524762 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.198908540E09 +++$+++ I noticed you are taking care of the GA part 2 comments. Thanks, but I think I may be in a better position to address the comment on the mature content references. Let me know when you are done and I will jump in. Again, many thanks![[Special:Contributions\/76.199.65.126|76.199.65.126]] ( +++$+++ ::::::I noticed you are taking care of the GA part 2 comments. Thanks, but I think I may be in a better position to address the comment on the mature content references. Let me know when you are done and I will jump in. Again, many thanks![[Special:Contributions/76.199.65.126|76.199.65.126]] ([[User talk:76.199.65.126|talk]]) 22:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
524764 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524756 +++$+++ 524763 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.198909080E09 +++$+++ Done - in fact I'm not sure I understood the mature content issue, so if I did that wrong, feel free to undo it. -- +++$+++ ::::::: Done - in fact I'm not sure I understood the mature content issue, so if I did that wrong, feel free to undo it. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 22:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
524765 +++$+++ 76.199.65.126 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524756 +++$+++ 524764 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.198910220E09 +++$+++ It's Reference #26. It only points to the mature content section. I'll change it to point to each individual link. I need a little bit of time to take care of that. Give me a few hours to take care of a few things, then I'll be back.  As for a user account, hmmm...I had one before but had some bad experiences with it. I tend to find that people appears to be nicer to a string of numbers. I dunno, the wiki world maybe different now than it was, I have to think about it. Again, thanks for the appreciation and encouragement. [[Special:Contributions\/76.199.65.126|76.199.65.126]] ( +++$+++ ::::::::It's Reference #26. It only points to the mature content section. I'll change it to point to each individual link. I need a little bit of time to take care of that. Give me a few hours to take care of a few things, then I'll be back.  As for a user account, hmmm...I had one before but had some bad experiences with it. I tend to find that people appears to be nicer to a string of numbers. I dunno, the wiki world maybe different now than it was, I have to think about it. Again, thanks for the appreciation and encouragement. [[Special:Contributions/76.199.65.126|76.199.65.126]] ([[User talk:76.199.65.126|talk]]) 22:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

262613 +++$+++ Aguerriero +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262613 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-04 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.162697040E09 +++$+++ Hey there and thanks for the great feedback.  I believe I have addressed all of your concerns, and replied at [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/List of Telecaster players]]. --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ Hey there and thanks for the great feedback.  I believe I have addressed all of your concerns, and replied at [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Telecaster players]]. --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Aguerriero|Aguerriero]] ([[User_talk:Aguerriero|talk]])</font> 19:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
262614 +++$+++ Aguerriero +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262613 +++$+++ 262613 +++$+++ 2006-11-04 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.162704540E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your help, and for your support.  We have lots of other guitarist-related lists to work on (see [[:Category:Lists of guitarists]]), and the comments here will help on the other lists as well.  --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ :Thanks again for your help, and for your support.  We have lots of other guitarist-related lists to work on (see [[:Category:Lists of guitarists]]), and the comments here will help on the other lists as well.  --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Aguerriero|Aguerriero]] ([[User_talk:Aguerriero|talk]])</font> 21:29, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
262615 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262613 +++$+++ 262613 +++$+++ 2006-11-06 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.162866120E09 +++$+++ I've responded on your talk page and on [[Talk:Epilepsy]].  +++$+++ :I've responded on your talk page and on [[Talk:Epilepsy]]. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

262616 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262616 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-06 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.162884420E09 +++$+++ cu round, -- +++$+++ cu round, --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 23:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
262617 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262616 +++$+++ 262616 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.162960740E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 20:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
262618 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262616 +++$+++ 262617 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.163393100E09 +++$+++ Hi Collin, I'm taking a study break so I won't return until February, if you want you're most welcome to try to improve MEDMOS.-- +++$+++ ::Hi Collin, I'm taking a study break so I won't return until February, if you want you're most welcome to try to improve MEDMOS.--[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 20:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

262620 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-20 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.164072720E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Colin - that is very interesting info !  I might not get to it until after the holidays.  What I really should do is get Kushner's book on the History, and write an entire daughter article on the History, incorporating the Time articles.  Thanks again!   +++$+++ Thanks, Colin - that is very interesting info !  I might not get to it until after the holidays.  What I really should do is get Kushner's book on the History, and write an entire daughter article on the History, incorporating the Time articles.  Thanks again!  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
262621 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262620 +++$+++ 262620 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.164585360E09 +++$+++ Colin, thank you so much for the improved image of GTS - you have really gone above and beyone to contribute to the quality of the article, and I have greatly appreciated your help !!   +++$+++ :Colin, thank you so much for the improved image of GTS - you have really gone above and beyone to contribute to the quality of the article, and I have greatly appreciated your help !!  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

524766 +++$+++ Peteforsyth +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-27 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.198752900E09 +++$+++ Hi there Anon, I just cropped [[:Image:Michael G. Halle and Tonya Harding.jpg|an image]] that you uploaded a few months ago to Commons. The description stated that the photographer requested that the image not be cropped, so I thought I should let you know. I'm all for honoring requests where possible, but in this case, I think having an appropriate photo of a prominent celebrity is important. The license explicitly allows modification; and the request to link back to the blog is still honored. If you feel that I'm in error, please let me know. - +++$+++ Hi there Anon, I just cropped [[:Image:Michael G. Halle and Tonya Harding.jpg|an image]] that you uploaded a few months ago to Commons. The description stated that the photographer requested that the image not be cropped, so I thought I should let you know. I'm all for honoring requests where possible, but in this case, I think having an appropriate photo of a prominent celebrity is important. The license explicitly allows modification; and the request to link back to the blog is still honored. If you feel that I'm in error, please let me know. -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 02:55, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
524767 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524766 +++$+++ 524766 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.198793880E09 +++$+++ Yes, I think you're in error. It's certainly ''allowed'' that we crop the image, but it's, well, ''rude''. The contributor asked nicely that we not crop the image, and if possible, we should respect his wishes. It's as if he gave us an artwork as a present; it's certainly allowed that we mutilate the artwork, it's ours, but it clearly hurts the feelings of the giver. If we can avoid it, we should. -- +++$+++ : Yes, I think you're in error. It's certainly ''allowed'' that we crop the image, but it's, well, ''rude''. The contributor asked nicely that we not crop the image, and if possible, we should respect his wishes. It's as if he gave us an artwork as a present; it's certainly allowed that we mutilate the artwork, it's ours, but it clearly hurts the feelings of the giver. If we can avoid it, we should. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
524768 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524766 +++$+++ 524767 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.198802280E09 +++$+++ In addition, I see you cropped the image without renaming it. It's now ''called'' \"Michael G. Halle and Tonya Harding.jpg\" but only shows Harding. That's clearly wrong. -- +++$+++ :: In addition, I see you cropped the image without renaming it. It's now ''called'' "Michael G. Halle and Tonya Harding.jpg" but only shows Harding. That's clearly wrong. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
524769 +++$+++ Tabercil +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524766 +++$+++ 524768 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.198804440E09 +++$+++ Indeed. What should have been done was the cropped image should have been uploaded under a different name, with a back-link to the original image of the two of them.  +++$+++ :::Indeed. What should have been done was the cropped image should have been uploaded under a different name, with a back-link to the original image of the two of them. [[User:Tabercil|Tabercil]] ([[User talk:Tabercil|talk]]) 17:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
524770 +++$+++ Peteforsyth +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524766 +++$+++ 524769 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.198814820E09 +++$+++ Also, I just found your earlier discussion on the talk page, and want to point out that I don't agree with the original objector; I don't see any problem whatsoever with linking to the guy's blog from the image page, which is common Wikipedia practice. (I'll link to this discussion from there too.) - +++$+++ :::: Also, I just found your earlier discussion on the talk page, and want to point out that I don't agree with the original objector; I don't see any problem whatsoever with linking to the guy's blog from the image page, which is common Wikipedia practice. (I'll link to this discussion from there too.) -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 20:07, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

262623 +++$+++ Nick Graves +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262623 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-01 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.165023000E09 +++$+++ I have expanded the lead as you suggested, and also deleted the criterion that a person's atheism must be relevant to their public life and works in order to be listed. Please let me know what you think about the lead: Is it clear enough and succinct enough? Are the criteria for inclusion valid? Thank you.  +++$+++ I have expanded the lead as you suggested, and also deleted the criterion that a person's atheism must be relevant to their public life and works in order to be listed. Please let me know what you think about the lead: Is it clear enough and succinct enough? Are the criteria for inclusion valid? Thank you. [[User:Nick Graves|Nick Graves]] 17:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
262624 +++$+++ Nick Graves +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262623 +++$+++ 262623 +++$+++ 2006-12-03 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.165138860E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for all of the helpful suggestion.  +++$+++ :Thanks again for all of the helpful suggestion. [[User:Nick Graves|Nick Graves]] 01:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
262625 +++$+++ Nick Graves +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262623 +++$+++ 262624 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.166097000E09 +++$+++ Hello Colin. I have followed your suggestion and changed the citation format for the Activists and Educators section of this list. This is new for me. Could you take a look at the section and tell me if everything looks ok before I proceed with the rest of the list? Thank you.  +++$+++ ::Hello Colin. I have followed your suggestion and changed the citation format for the Activists and Educators section of this list. This is new for me. Could you take a look at the section and tell me if everything looks ok before I proceed with the rest of the list? Thank you. [[User:Nick Graves|Nick Graves]] 03:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

262626 +++$+++ Tompw +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-01 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.165024020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for you comments on [[List of Saskatchewan general elections]]' featured list nominations page. You may be interested to know that the Alberta, Manitoba and British Columbia equivilants are currently [[WP:FLC|Featured List Candidates]], and I would welcome your input.  +++$+++ Thanks for you comments on [[List of Saskatchewan general elections]]' featured list nominations page. You may be interested to know that the Alberta, Manitoba and British Columbia equivilants are currently [[WP:FLC|Featured List Candidates]], and I would welcome your input. [[User:Tompw|Tompw]] 17:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
262627 +++$+++ Tompw +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262626 +++$+++ 262626 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.165266000E09 +++$+++ So is [[List of Nova Scotia general elections]] (which now has had its objections sorted out).  +++$+++ :So is [[List of Nova Scotia general elections]] (which now has had its objections sorted out). [[User:Tompw|Tompw]] 13:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

524771 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524771 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-27 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.198815900E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 20:25, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
524772 +++$+++ Peteforsyth +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524771 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.198816800E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'll get in touch with him. Sorry if my initial approach was \"too bold.\" I'm happy to take it slow. And no, I didn't mean to imply the photo is unflattering to Harding, I was just stating an example\u2026somewhat sloppily, I guuss! - +++$+++ :: Okay, I'll get in touch with him. Sorry if my initial approach was "too bold." I'm happy to take it slow. And no, I didn't mean to imply the photo is unflattering to Harding, I was just stating an example…somewhat sloppily, I guuss! -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 20:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
524773 +++$+++ Peteforsyth +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524771 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.198829940E09 +++$+++ Anon, I just had an email exchange with Michael, and posted it -- and my thoughts -- on the [[Talk:Tonya Harding]] page. Let's continue the discussion over there, where others (like [[User:VanTucky]]) are more likely to see it. - +++$+++ ::: Anon, I just had an email exchange with Michael, and posted it -- and my thoughts -- on the [[Talk:Tonya Harding]] page. Let's continue the discussion over there, where others (like [[User:VanTucky]]) are more likely to see it. -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 00:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

524775 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524775 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-27 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.198820520E09 +++$+++ |} The guinea pigs having said this is good enough, I'm working my way through the A's ++ +++$+++ |} The guinea pigs having said this is good enough, I'm working my way through the A's ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 21:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
524776 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524775 +++$+++ 524775 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.198883040E09 +++$+++ If I hadn't already supported you for stewardship, I'd be wishing I had. -- +++$+++ : If I hadn't already supported you for stewardship, I'd be wishing I had. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
524777 +++$+++ Larbot +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524775 +++$+++ 524776 +++$+++ 2007-12-30 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.199084880E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much! Note alsos... 1) since [[Wikipedia:Administrators open to recall\/Admin criteria|the table page]] has been moved from a cat to a non cat, the edit history has been lost. You may want to re-edit your entry in the table to validate that it was you that added it. 2) Since you're using mine, you may want to give a link to a specific history entry version of the page, heck I may change mine to say that admins that start with A only need 1 petitioner to get recalled or something :) Cacharoth's entry is an example of how that was done ++[[User:Larbot|Larbot]] - run by  +++$+++ ::Thanks very much! Note alsos... 1) since [[Wikipedia:Administrators open to recall/Admin criteria|the table page]] has been moved from a cat to a non cat, the edit history has been lost. You may want to re-edit your entry in the table to validate that it was you that added it. 2) Since you're using mine, you may want to give a link to a specific history entry version of the page, heck I may change mine to say that admins that start with A only need 1 petitioner to get recalled or something :) Cacharoth's entry is an example of how that was done ++[[User:Larbot|Larbot]] - run by [[User:Lar]] -  [[User_talk:Larbot|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Larbot|c]] 23:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

262632 +++$+++ Remember +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-14 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.166134620E09 +++$+++ I have set up this article, [[List of notable organ transplant donors and recipients]], and I thought you might be interested in making it better.  +++$+++ I have set up this article, [[List of notable organ transplant donors and recipients]], and I thought you might be interested in making it better. [[User:Remember|Remember]] 14:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
262633 +++$+++ Remember +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262632 +++$+++ 262632 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.167351960E09 +++$+++ I have revised the article [[List of notable organ transplant donors and recipients]], and was hoping you would take a look at the revision.  +++$+++ : I have revised the article [[List of notable organ transplant donors and recipients]], and was hoping you would take a look at the revision. [[User:Remember|Remember]] 16:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

262635 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-17 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.166398980E09 +++$+++ There, even though the book were not used in the making of the list and they had to be looked up online and even though they are less accurate than some of the fan pages, they have been added. Is there anything else that needs doing or was that your only compaint? --  +++$+++ There, even though the book were not used in the making of the list and they had to be looked up online and even though they are less accurate than some of the fan pages, they have been added. Is there anything else that needs doing or was that your only compaint? -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]] 15:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
262636 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262635 +++$+++ 262635 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.166670120E09 +++$+++ I'm going to say right now that I'm not doing that. Because, right now, it's featured list quality. Sure, not officially, but people just use lack of sources as an easy way to fail lists or articles they dislike, which is proved in the fact that the list was failed despite a 6-2 approval. And why won't I do it? It's because you are suggesting I delete the entire list and then readd only the guest stars listed on the official website and that would make the list incomplete. Yes, it would meet the sourcing requirements, but an incomplete list is not FL quality. If you had a list of US Presidents that only had 40, you would probably consider it an absolute travesty and try to fail that list should it be trying for FL status. Well, that's how I feel, and if it means that in order to keep a complete, up to date and quality list that I can't get FL status, then so be it. --  +++$+++ :I'm going to say right now that I'm not doing that. Because, right now, it's featured list quality. Sure, not officially, but people just use lack of sources as an easy way to fail lists or articles they dislike, which is proved in the fact that the list was failed despite a 6-2 approval. And why won't I do it? It's because you are suggesting I delete the entire list and then readd only the guest stars listed on the official website and that would make the list incomplete. Yes, it would meet the sourcing requirements, but an incomplete list is not FL quality. If you had a list of US Presidents that only had 40, you would probably consider it an absolute travesty and try to fail that list should it be trying for FL status. Well, that's how I feel, and if it means that in order to keep a complete, up to date and quality list that I can't get FL status, then so be it. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]] 19:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
262637 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262635 +++$+++ 262636 +++$+++ 2006-12-21 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.166689440E09 +++$+++ People DO use sources as an excuse. Most people just say \"Oppose: Lack of sources\" instead of commenting on the actual content of the article. And, like I said, I'm not doing a thing that will make my list incomplete, because to become an FL, there are several important parts, ie. Being well formatted, well sourced, accurate and complete. And a list that is INTENTIONALLY not as complete as possible is not an FL in my mind, especially when there are sources. Yes, it's a fan page, but it's still extremely accurate and a better source than the official site, so why not use it? I know that the policy says no fansites, but Simpsons fans are well-known for their attention to detail and devotion, so in terms of episode content (plot, guests, hidden things, etc), I'd take a fan site over the official site any day. --  +++$+++ ::People DO use sources as an excuse. Most people just say "Oppose: Lack of sources" instead of commenting on the actual content of the article. And, like I said, I'm not doing a thing that will make my list incomplete, because to become an FL, there are several important parts, ie. Being well formatted, well sourced, accurate and complete. And a list that is INTENTIONALLY not as complete as possible is not an FL in my mind, especially when there are sources. Yes, it's a fan page, but it's still extremely accurate and a better source than the official site, so why not use it? I know that the policy says no fansites, but Simpsons fans are well-known for their attention to detail and devotion, so in terms of episode content (plot, guests, hidden things, etc), I'd take a fan site over the official site any day. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]] 00:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

495 +++$+++ NJMauthor +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-11 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.221131880E09 +++$+++ Hello. I don't really understand why you changed the article \"Zui Quan in Media\" to \"Zui Quan in popular culture\"? It seems like a needless edit, and less accurate in describing the contents of the article.  +++$+++ Hello. I don't really understand why you changed the article "Zui Quan in Media" to "Zui Quan in popular culture"? It seems like a needless edit, and less accurate in describing the contents of the article. [[User:NJMauthor|NJMauthor]] ([[User talk:NJMauthor|talk]]) 04:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
496 +++$+++ JuJube +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 495 +++$+++ 495 +++$+++ 2008-09-30 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.222765320E09 +++$+++ I thought that game character articles with pictures used their most recent appearance?  +++$+++ *I thought that game character articles with pictures used their most recent appearance? [[User:JuJube|JuJube]] ([[User talk:JuJube|talk]]) 02:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

262640 +++$+++ Luna Santin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 08:45:00 +++$+++ 1.167756300E09 +++$+++ Oh, huh. If the group\/individual is being very abusive, [[WP:AUTO]] and [[WP:COI]] can apply, I believe. I've sometimes had better luck by pointing out policies such as [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:V]], and asking that if they have any particular problems with the article, they mention them on the talk page for somebody to take care of. If there's obvious junk or vandalism, I don't have any problem with their removing it; beyond that, they would have to admit that, at least objectively speaking, they're not a neutral party in terms of trying to write a scholarly article. Granted, I still haven't perfected an approach to that sort of thing, by a longshot.  +++$+++ Oh, huh. If the group/individual is being very abusive, [[WP:AUTO]] and [[WP:COI]] can apply, I believe. I've sometimes had better luck by pointing out policies such as [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:V]], and asking that if they have any particular problems with the article, they mention them on the talk page for somebody to take care of. If there's obvious junk or vandalism, I don't have any problem with their removing it; beyond that, they would have to admit that, at least objectively speaking, they're not a neutral party in terms of trying to write a scholarly article. Granted, I still haven't perfected an approach to that sort of thing, by a longshot. [[User:Luna Santin|Luna Santin]] 08:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
262641 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262640 +++$+++ 262640 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.167780240E09 +++$+++ Colin, I routinely encounter the same problem; e.g. [[The Carter Center]] and [[HONcode]].  It looks like the only reason IAHP is notable is because of the criticism.  Let me know if I can help.   +++$+++ :Colin, I routinely encounter the same problem; e.g. [[The Carter Center]] and [[HONcode]].  It looks like the only reason IAHP is notable is because of the criticism.  Let me know if I can help.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
262642 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262640 +++$+++ 262640 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.168475640E09 +++$+++ [[Sirolimus|Done]]. I hope they came out OK.  +++$+++ :[[Sirolimus|Done]]. I hope they came out OK. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 16:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
262643 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262640 +++$+++ 262642 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.168653060E09 +++$+++ You're welcome\u2014glad to see it put to good use!  +++$+++ ::You're welcome—glad to see it put to good use! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 17:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
262644 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262640 +++$+++ 262643 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.168669920E09 +++$+++ Hi Colin. As you can see, images are my forte :) I'm afraid to inform you it's just a field of interest, I'm not a biologist. I'd be glad to help, but I must warn you some of it may be over my head as well :) By the way, have you contacted the folks over at [[WP:MCB]]? There are plenty of active and very competent contributors there who may be able to help you a lot.  +++$+++ :::Hi Colin. As you can see, images are my forte :) I'm afraid to inform you it's just a field of interest, I'm not a biologist. I'd be glad to help, but I must warn you some of it may be over my head as well :) By the way, have you contacted the folks over at [[WP:MCB]]? There are plenty of active and very competent contributors there who may be able to help you a lot. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 22:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
262645 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262640 +++$+++ 262644 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.168672620E09 +++$+++ I'd still like to, of course\u2014the only reason I'll not \"jump into the fray\" is my wariness of screwing up :) Sorry for not being able to help more.  +++$+++ ::::I'd still like to, of course—the only reason I'll not "jump into the fray" is my wariness of screwing up :) Sorry for not being able to help more. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 23:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

122223 +++$+++ Best O Fortuna +++$+++ Monkeyzpop +++$+++ 122223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-14 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.216090200E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Best O Fortuna|Best O Fortuna]] ([[User talk:Best O Fortuna|talk]]) 19:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
122224 +++$+++ Davidkevin +++$+++ Monkeyzpop +++$+++ 122223 +++$+++ 122223 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.225283220E09 +++$+++ Dozens of people are not under discussion.  Dr. Pournelle's comment is specifically, individually notable due to his own notability as an author of several dozens of books, his past political work in Los Angeles, and the extraordinarily wide gap between his own politics and Mr. Asner's.  In this day of vicious hatreds spawning due to political differences, Dr. Pournelle's consideration of Mr. Asner as a good neighbor is an extraordinary compliment to Mr. Asner, and worthy of notation in an encyclopedic article.  --  +++$+++ : Dozens of people are not under discussion.  Dr. Pournelle's comment is specifically, individually notable due to his own notability as an author of several dozens of books, his past political work in Los Angeles, and the extraordinarily wide gap between his own politics and Mr. Asner's.  In this day of vicious hatreds spawning due to political differences, Dr. Pournelle's consideration of Mr. Asner as a good neighbor is an extraordinary compliment to Mr. Asner, and worthy of notation in an encyclopedic article.  -- [[User:Davidkevin|Davidkevin]] ([[User talk:Davidkevin|talk]]) 05:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

524788 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.199299980E09 +++$+++ Can categories be created quickly and easily or does it require a lot of red tape and fuss ?  :  +++$+++ Can categories be created quickly and easily or does it require a lot of red tape and fuss ?  : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] ([[User talk:Albion moonlight|talk]]) 10:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
524789 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524788 +++$+++ 524788 +++$+++ 2008-01-02 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.199315580E09 +++$+++ They can be created quickly and easily. The worst that can happen is the category will be deleted at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion]] - you can take a look at that and [[Wikipedia:Categories]] for guidelines. If you're trying to add a category to a page about a person, you want [[Wikipedia:Categorization of people]]. One fairly common issue that usually causes a category to be removed is called \"performer by performance\", for example \"Singers who have covered Danny Boy\", or something like that. A category should usually be something relatively important and uncontroversial about the subject, and something that won't change trivially. -- +++$+++ : They can be created quickly and easily. The worst that can happen is the category will be deleted at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion]] - you can take a look at that and [[Wikipedia:Categories]] for guidelines. If you're trying to add a category to a page about a person, you want [[Wikipedia:Categorization of people]]. One fairly common issue that usually causes a category to be removed is called "performer by performance", for example "Singers who have covered Danny Boy", or something like that. A category should usually be something relatively important and uncontroversial about the subject, and something that won't change trivially. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

262646 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262646 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.168849440E09 +++$+++ Colin, thanks SO much - I've printed out everything to read on an upcoming plane trip, but I really need to read Kushner's book before tackling the article - I've been told it is ''the'' definitive tome.  Do you speak French?  I can't do anything with the French articles.  Best,  +++$+++ Colin, thanks SO much - I've printed out everything to read on an upcoming plane trip, but I really need to read Kushner's book before tackling the article - I've been told it is ''the'' definitive tome.  Do you speak French?  I can't do anything with the French articles.  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
262647 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262646 +++$+++ 262646 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.169698020E09 +++$+++ Colin, I read the articles on the plane, and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:History_of_Tourette_syndrome#Thanks.2C_Colin responded here:] I'm wondering if you wanted to work on that article?  I won't have time for several months.   +++$+++ :Colin, I read the articles on the plane, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:History_of_Tourette_syndrome#Thanks.2C_Colin responded here:] I'm wondering if you wanted to work on that article?  I won't have time for several months.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
262648 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262646 +++$+++ 262647 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.169794980E09 +++$+++ Colin, if you email me, I can tell you of someone who may help you locate journal articles.   +++$+++ ::Colin, if you email me, I can tell you of someone who may help you locate journal articles.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

87465 +++$+++ Rick570 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87465 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-12 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.278954120E09 +++$+++ Hi Qwip. I did not know there was such a crime. Sorry. One aspect of the rule of law is that statutes should be duly promulgated and published. Could you give me the text concerned, explain how was promulgated, and how such laws can be easily accessed? Thank you very much for your guidance in this matter. Knd regards. Perhaps you can also explain why ceertain votes go ont the Adf statistics and others don't? +++$+++ Hi Qwip. I did not know there was such a crime. Sorry. One aspect of the rule of law is that statutes should be duly promulgated and published. Could you give me the text concerned, explain how was promulgated, and how such laws can be easily accessed? Thank you very much for your guidance in this matter. Knd regards. Perhaps you can also explain why ceertain votes go ont the Adf statistics and others don't?[[User:Rick570|Rick570]] ([[User talk:Rick570|talk]]) 10:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
87466 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87465 +++$+++ 87465 +++$+++ 2010-07-21 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.279720920E09 +++$+++ Going from the end of your 1st line to the beginning of your 2nd line under 'the correct simplification' assumes <math>\\left(\\sum y_i\\right)^2 = \\sum y_i^2<\/math>, which isn't right. The square of the sum isn't the same as the sum of the squares.  +++$+++ :Going from the end of your 1st line to the beginning of your 2nd line under 'the correct simplification' assumes <math>\left(\sum y_i\right)^2 = \sum y_i^2</math>, which isn't right. The square of the sum isn't the same as the sum of the squares. [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 07:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

506 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 506 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-24 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.235540520E09 +++$+++ I expect to see you delete all Kotaku references and replace them with your own more reliable sources. -- +++$+++ I expect to see you delete all Kotaku references and replace them with your own more reliable sources. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] ([[User talk:EveryDayJoe45|talk]]) 21:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
507 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 506 +++$+++ 506 +++$+++ 2009-02-24 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.235544780E09 +++$+++ My issue is not with the fact that Kotaku is cited, but that the article is nothing more that [[WP:SPECULATION|speculation]] about what content ''might'' come out based on what was cut during production. There's no confirmation that any such content will be released, and per the policy of the site [[WP:NOTCRYSTAL|not being a crystal ball]] to predict the future, it doesn't belong in the article.  +++$+++ :My issue is not with the fact that Kotaku is cited, but that the article is nothing more that [[WP:SPECULATION|speculation]] about what content ''might'' come out based on what was cut during production. There's no confirmation that any such content will be released, and per the policy of the site [[WP:NOTCRYSTAL|not being a crystal ball]] to predict the future, it doesn't belong in the article. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|edits]])</font> 22:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
508 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 506 +++$+++ 507 +++$+++ 2009-02-24 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.235545800E09 +++$+++ First off don't split discussions. Second, I understand your point except if its stated by the game maker then it is not crystal ball. If it is then you can go ahead and erase the costume sets too because they are \"not official\" yet I guess. I understand this page is your thing and You like patrolling it, but you are acting like you own it. There is no rule against adding info confirmed by the makers. -- +++$+++ ::First off don't split discussions. Second, I understand your point except if its stated by the game maker then it is not crystal ball. If it is then you can go ahead and erase the costume sets too because they are "not official" yet I guess. I understand this page is your thing and You like patrolling it, but you are acting like you own it. There is no rule against adding info confirmed by the makers. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] ([[User talk:EveryDayJoe45|talk]]) 23:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
509 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 506 +++$+++ 508 +++$+++ 2009-02-24 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.235546580E09 +++$+++ Just because it is stated by the game maker doesn't make any less speculation. Remember he says if there's fan demand, they will be made available - but until then, we have no idea if it will happen or not. And the costumes are a completely different issue - they were finished and included in the final game, and the DLC for it has been confirmed and scheduled for release. No such information has been given for new character, so it doesn't belong in the article.  +++$+++ :::Just because it is stated by the game maker doesn't make any less speculation. Remember he says if there's fan demand, they will be made available - but until then, we have no idea if it will happen or not. And the costumes are a completely different issue - they were finished and included in the final game, and the DLC for it has been confirmed and scheduled for release. No such information has been given for new character, so it doesn't belong in the article. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|edits]])</font> 23:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
510 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 506 +++$+++ 509 +++$+++ 2009-02-24 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.235547060E09 +++$+++ What you are saying is absurd. You're trying to defend your case, but it makes no sense. You said it yourself, he said \"if there's fan demand, they will be made available.\"  That is words from his mouth, so its not speculation. Its not saying they will be available, its saying he said they may be available if this happens. Thats not speculation or crystal ball, its fact, and theres no rules against that. Perhaps a straw poll in the discussion is in order. -- +++$+++ ::::What you are saying is absurd. You're trying to defend your case, but it makes no sense. You said it yourself, he said "if there's fan demand, they will be made available."  That is words from his mouth, so its not speculation. Its not saying they will be available, its saying he said they may be available if this happens. Thats not speculation or crystal ball, its fact, and theres no rules against that. Perhaps a straw poll in the discussion is in order. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] ([[User talk:EveryDayJoe45|talk]]) 23:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
511 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 506 +++$+++ 510 +++$+++ 2009-02-26 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.235719860E09 +++$+++ Umm.......... Don't know if you forgot or your avoiding the discussion, but yeah... -- +++$+++ :::::Umm.......... Don't know if you forgot or your avoiding the discussion, but yeah... --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] ([[User talk:EveryDayJoe45|talk]]) 23:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
512 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 506 +++$+++ 511 +++$+++ 2009-02-27 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.235722020E09 +++$+++ No, just been busy with work. If you want to start a straw poll in the SFIV talk page, by all means go ahead. I'd like a little more discussion on the issue anyway.  +++$+++ ::::::No, just been busy with work. If you want to start a straw poll in the SFIV talk page, by all means go ahead. I'd like a little more discussion on the issue anyway. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|edits]])</font> 00:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
513 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 506 +++$+++ 512 +++$+++ 2009-02-27 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.235793000E09 +++$+++ Will do. -- +++$+++ :::::::Will do. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] ([[User talk:EveryDayJoe45|talk]]) 19:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

524795 +++$+++ Tourskin +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-03 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.199424000E09 +++$+++ This may seem like the reaction of a sour loser, but you haven't given me the 7 days to fix it.  +++$+++ This may seem like the reaction of a sour loser, but you haven't given me the 7 days to fix it. [[User:Tourskin|Tourskin]] ([[User talk:Tourskin|talk]]) 21:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
524796 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524795 +++$+++ 524795 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.199425500E09 +++$+++ Responded on article talk page. Please, do fix it, I'm all for giving out the little green plus. :-) -- +++$+++ : Responded on article talk page. Please, do fix it, I'm all for giving out the little green plus. :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 21:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

524797 +++$+++ Junebug52 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-04 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.199446560E09 +++$+++ Hey Bud, I need to see if we can get your help on an issue. We are trying to get the article about the [[Grammy awards]] in shape and myself and another editor are trying to decide if we should keep or get rid of the \"records\" section of the article. It is true that the section does not have a lot of focus. As you can see here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Grammy_Award#Records.3F] the other editor is in favor of deleting it from the page. I myself feel that the section needs to remain. I feel that if people want to look up the information, they can go to the Grammy website and look up the information and confirm it with what we have included. Hypo feels that it seems more like original research. I feel that we both have merit, but we feel it would be best for us to have a third opinion. Can you ring in on this? I have always appreciated the way you look at these issues with fairness.  +++$+++ Hey Bud, I need to see if we can get your help on an issue. We are trying to get the article about the [[Grammy awards]] in shape and myself and another editor are trying to decide if we should keep or get rid of the "records" section of the article. It is true that the section does not have a lot of focus. As you can see here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Grammy_Award#Records.3F] the other editor is in favor of deleting it from the page. I myself feel that the section needs to remain. I feel that if people want to look up the information, they can go to the Grammy website and look up the information and confirm it with what we have included. Hypo feels that it seems more like original research. I feel that we both have merit, but we feel it would be best for us to have a third opinion. Can you ring in on this? I have always appreciated the way you look at these issues with fairness. [[User:Junebug52|Junebug52]] 03:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
524798 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524797 +++$+++ 524797 +++$+++ 2008-01-07 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.199745000E09 +++$+++ Sorry I'm taking so long to weigh in, but, first, I don't really know much about the Grammys, and, second, it is a tough call. I like the idea of having information in the Wikipedia (shock!), but there is something to be said for the \"original research\" issue as well. The best solution would be to cite this information to a source. Surely there is some publication somewhere that keeps this data? -- +++$+++ : Sorry I'm taking so long to weigh in, but, first, I don't really know much about the Grammys, and, second, it is a tough call. I like the idea of having information in the Wikipedia (shock!), but there is something to be said for the "original research" issue as well. The best solution would be to cite this information to a source. Surely there is some publication somewhere that keeps this data? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

393301 +++$+++ Calton +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-29 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.180452300E09 +++$+++ Nope. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Nope. Thanks. --[[User:Calton|Calton]] | [[User talk:Calton|Talk]] 08:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
393302 +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393301 +++$+++ 393301 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.180452360E09 +++$+++ OK I have an asshole stalking me. Great.  +++$+++ :OK I have an asshole stalking me. Great. [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 08:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
393303 +++$+++ Calton +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393301 +++$+++ 393302 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.180453380E09 +++$+++ Not even wrong, but thanks for playing. Oh, by the way, [[WP:NPA|this]] makes for informative reading. Remember it when you comment on the [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion\/User:Kappa\/Kaaos|MFD discussion]]. -- +++$+++ ::Not even wrong, but thanks for playing. Oh, by the way, [[WP:NPA|this]] makes for informative reading. Remember it when you comment on the [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kappa/Kaaos|MFD discussion]]. --[[User:Calton|Calton]] | [[User talk:Calton|Talk]] 08:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
393304 +++$+++ Gaff +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393301 +++$+++ 393303 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.180491660E09 +++$+++ I voted to keep the material in your userspace.  However, your comments above constitue a personal attack.  Consider this a warning.  <em>&mdash;<font color=\"Indigo\"> +++$+++ :::I voted to keep the material in your userspace.  However, your comments above constitue a personal attack.  Consider this a warning.  <em>&mdash;<font color="Indigo">[[User:Gaff|Gaff]]</font> <sup><small><b><font color="MediumSlateBlue">[[User_talk:Gaff|ταλκ]]</font></b></small></sup></em> 19:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

524801 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-05 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.199524320E09 +++$+++ Big day for the Japanese porn project, Anon-- [[Tetsuji Takechi]]-- We've got a GA to our credit! Thank you for prodding me to go through with the process, for all your help and advice with my work here. Cheers!  +++$+++ Big day for the Japanese porn project, Anon-- [[Tetsuji Takechi]]-- We've got a GA to our credit! Thank you for prodding me to go through with the process, for all your help and advice with my work here. Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 01:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
524802 +++$+++  +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524801 +++$+++ 524801 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Congratulations! Your next steps are either nominating another one or two for GA, or this one for FA. From recent experience, the FA review will naturally be tougher - expect about five people rather than one - but the GA will take a month and a half, rather than a week and a half, so may be more frustrating in that respect. :-) --19:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ : Congratulations! Your next steps are either nominating another one or two for GA, or this one for FA. From recent experience, the FA review will naturally be tougher - expect about five people rather than one - but the GA will take a month and a half, rather than a week and a half, so may be more frustrating in that respect. :-) --19:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
524803 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524801 +++$+++ 524802 +++$+++ 2008-01-07 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.199776920E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Anon. I read through the Takechi article after its passing, and cringed at the awkward wording... I'll keep working away at it, and eventually try it for FA, but not for a while. I think I'll try for more GAs in the meantime. I've found a good, long analysis of ''[[Wife to Be Sacrificed]]'' by a professor of Film. The article's already in fairly good shape. Think I should try for that one next? And, by the way, Happy New Year!  +++$+++ :: Thanks, Anon. I read through the Takechi article after its passing, and cringed at the awkward wording... I'll keep working away at it, and eventually try it for FA, but not for a while. I think I'll try for more GAs in the meantime. I've found a good, long analysis of ''[[Wife to Be Sacrificed]]'' by a professor of Film. The article's already in fairly good shape. Think I should try for that one next? And, by the way, Happy New Year! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 23:22, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
524804 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524801 +++$+++ 524803 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.199842740E09 +++$+++ Seems reasonable. I personally worry about the prominence given to a specific ''sixth of a second'' of film...  <small>squeamish? me?<\/small>-- +++$+++ ::: Seems reasonable. I personally worry about the prominence given to a specific ''sixth of a second'' of film...  <small>squeamish? me?</small>--[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
524805 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524801 +++$+++ 524804 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.199843400E09 +++$+++ Oh? Personally, I'm cackling like a mad scientist and rubbing my hands with glee at just the thought of that appearing on the main page some day... ;)  +++$+++ :::: Oh? Personally, I'm cackling like a mad scientist and rubbing my hands with glee at just the thought of that appearing on the main page some day... ;) [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 17:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

515 +++$+++ FullMetal Falcon +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-20 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.242804720E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tatsunoko_vs._Capcom:_Ultimate_All_Stars&diff=next&oldid=238961371 About this edit]. Can you tell me if this date is for the arcade or Wii version?  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tatsunoko_vs._Capcom:_Ultimate_All_Stars&diff=next&oldid=238961371 About this edit]. Can you tell me if this date is for the arcade or Wii version? [[User:FullMetal Falcon/FMF|'''<font color="#666666">«&nbsp;₣M₣&nbsp;»</font>''']] 00:32, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
516 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 515 +++$+++ 515 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.242811200E09 +++$+++ It's for the Wii version. http:\/\/www.1up.com\/do\/newsStory?cId=3169973 Why do you ask?  +++$+++ :It's for the Wii version. http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3169973 Why do you ask? [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|edits]])</font> 02:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

517 +++$+++ FullMetal Falcon +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-09 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.244612040E09 +++$+++ Out of curiosity, do you remember what \"materials\" [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tatsunoko_vs._Capcom:_Ultimate_All_Stars&diff=next&oldid=231556863] Capcom released stating its number seven?  +++$+++ Out of curiosity, do you remember what "materials" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tatsunoko_vs._Capcom:_Ultimate_All_Stars&diff=next&oldid=231556863] Capcom released stating its number seven? [[User:FullMetal Falcon/FMF|'''<font color="#666666">«&nbsp;₣M₣&nbsp;»</font>''']] 22:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
518 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 517 +++$+++ 517 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.244618220E09 +++$+++ If I can find a source corroborating that statement, I will present it. However, the only thing I can remember is Capcom promotional materials promoting it as the continuation of the [[Marvel vs. Capcom series]], but I can't recall Capcom specifically numerating which installment it was (Seventh game would indicate that it includes the Capcom vs. SNK games, which have generally been considered as their own series, not combined with the Marvel vs. games).  +++$+++ :If I can find a source corroborating that statement, I will present it. However, the only thing I can remember is Capcom promotional materials promoting it as the continuation of the [[Marvel vs. Capcom series]], but I can't recall Capcom specifically numerating which installment it was (Seventh game would indicate that it includes the Capcom vs. SNK games, which have generally been considered as their own series, not combined with the Marvel vs. games). [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|edits]])</font> 00:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
519 +++$+++ FullMetal Falcon +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 517 +++$+++ 518 +++$+++ 2009-06-11 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.244761140E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks. It doesn't seem to be too much of an issue, if you cannot find it. Its just something that bugged me since I want to collect as much information as possible. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Ok, thanks. It doesn't seem to be too much of an issue, if you cannot find it. Its just something that bugged me since I want to collect as much information as possible. Regards, [[User:FullMetal Falcon/FMF|'''<font color="#666666">«&nbsp;₣M₣&nbsp;»</font>''']] 15:59, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

524807 +++$+++ Deatonjr +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-08 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.199792820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for finding a free image of [[Quanell X]] from Flickr!  It is like a late Christmas present.  How did you know to look for one??   +++$+++ Thanks for finding a free image of [[Quanell X]] from Flickr!  It is like a late Christmas present.  How did you know to look for one??  [[User:Deatonjr|Deatonjr]] ([[User talk:Deatonjr|talk]]) 03:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
524808 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524807 +++$+++ 524807 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.199832840E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. I read the article talk page and saw the request. Why was I looking at the article talk page? I was probably clicking around following interesting links from people's user pages, or contributions, or articles. I'm not sure myself, really. :-) -- +++$+++ : You're welcome. I read the article talk page and saw the request. Why was I looking at the article talk page? I was probably clicking around following interesting links from people's user pages, or contributions, or articles. I'm not sure myself, really. :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

521 +++$+++ Davidelit +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-24 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.253802180E09 +++$+++ Phew, that was quick. You beat me to [[WP:AIV]] with the report on 202.155.92.10. Persistent isn't s\/he? Regards <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\">  +++$+++ Phew, that was quick. You beat me to [[WP:AIV]] with the report on 202.155.92.10. Persistent isn't s/he? Regards <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml"> [[User:Davidelit|Davidelit ]][[User talk:Davidelit|(Talk)]] </span> 07:23, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
522 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 521 +++$+++ 521 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.253802240E09 +++$+++ Indeed he\/she is. I've been keeping a track of this person for over a year now; they're an Indonesian user who constantly vandalizes anime, game and movie studio articles with misinformation. He's IP jumped so many times that I don't think he'll ever be stopped.  +++$+++ :Indeed he/she is. I've been keeping a track of this person for over a year now; they're an Indonesian user who constantly vandalizes anime, game and movie studio articles with misinformation. He's IP jumped so many times that I don't think he'll ever be stopped. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|edits]])</font> 07:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
523 +++$+++ Davidelit +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 521 +++$+++ 522 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.253803500E09 +++$+++ Yes, it is a problem. 202.70.61.148 is another of the IPs. Well, let's see what happens. I'll wait to see if s\/he is blocked before reverting again. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\">  +++$+++ ::Yes, it is a problem. 202.70.61.148 is another of the IPs. Well, let's see what happens. I'll wait to see if s/he is blocked before reverting again. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml"> [[User:Davidelit|Davidelit ]][[User talk:Davidelit|(Talk)]] </span> 07:45, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
524 +++$+++  +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 521 +++$+++ 523 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.253815620E09 +++$+++ Ditto. That guy's persistent, I know (and annoying as well). I've also encountered this guy numerous times, and I was the one who first reported him on WP:AN\/I ([[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/IncidentArchive341#Re: Big problem caused by \"61.5.*.*\/61.94.*.*\" IP user|this is the report as archived]]). The guy also operated on the following ranges: 202.70.61.133, 202.70.61.146, 114.59.100.70, and the 118.137.x.x range (which I know you're aware already), as well as many others that I can't mention here as of this moment, all in Indonesia. It seems no amount of warning, not even in Indonesian, stopped him. I've already told everything about this guy to [[User talk:Nja247|Nja247]], so Nja247 has oftentimes become my go-to admin whenever the vandal strikes or has striken within the last few minutes\/hours of his last attack. -  +++$+++ :::Ditto. That guy's persistent, I know (and annoying as well). I've also encountered this guy numerous times, and I was the one who first reported him on WP:AN/I ([[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive341#Re: Big problem caused by "61.5.*.*/61.94.*.*" IP user|this is the report as archived]]). The guy also operated on the following ranges: 202.70.61.133, 202.70.61.146, 114.59.100.70, and the 118.137.x.x range (which I know you're aware already), as well as many others that I can't mention here as of this moment, all in Indonesia. It seems no amount of warning, not even in Indonesian, stopped him. I've already told everything about this guy to [[User talk:Nja247|Nja247]], so Nja247 has oftentimes become my go-to admin whenever the vandal strikes or has striken within the last few minutes/hours of his last attack. - [[User: Nanami Kamimura|上村七美 (Nanami-chan)]] | <small>[[User talk: Nanami Kamimura|talkback]] | [[Special: Contributions/Nanami Kamimura|contribs]]</small> 11:07, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
525 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 521 +++$+++ 524 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.253834220E09 +++$+++ I wonder if it would be possible to request multiple, long-term range blocks on the offending ranges. I know I requested such a thing from admin [[User:Nihonjoe]] a while back, and he blocked several offending ranges for 6 months, during which vandalism from this user was relatively quiet (as far as I could tell, anyway) as a result. Maybe a similar set of range blocks (hopefully for a year or longer) could deter this user.  +++$+++ ::::I wonder if it would be possible to request multiple, long-term range blocks on the offending ranges. I know I requested such a thing from admin [[User:Nihonjoe]] a while back, and he blocked several offending ranges for 6 months, during which vandalism from this user was relatively quiet (as far as I could tell, anyway) as a result. Maybe a similar set of range blocks (hopefully for a year or longer) could deter this user. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|edits]])</font> 16:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
526 +++$+++  +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 521 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.253834820E09 +++$+++ Since the 202.70.61.x range will be automatically unblocked a few minutes from now (MuZemike did the block on 202.70.61.128\/27 a week ago as an immediate action to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/IncidentArchive564#An already big problem by misinformation vandal|my report on the vandal]]), I'm sure the vandal will show up on that range once again. -  +++$+++ ::::::Since the 202.70.61.x range will be automatically unblocked a few minutes from now (MuZemike did the block on 202.70.61.128/27 a week ago as an immediate action to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive564#An already big problem by misinformation vandal|my report on the vandal]]), I'm sure the vandal will show up on that range once again. - [[User: Nanami Kamimura|上村七美 (Nanami-chan)]] | <small>[[User talk: Nanami Kamimura|talkback]] | [[Special: Contributions/Nanami Kamimura|contribs]]</small> 16:27, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
527 +++$+++  +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 521 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.253835240E09 +++$+++ '''P. S.:''' I've already told Nja247 about 202.155.92.10, BTW. -  +++$+++ ::::::'''P. S.:''' I've already told Nja247 about 202.155.92.10, BTW. - [[User: Nanami Kamimura|上村七美 (Nanami-chan)]] | <small>[[User talk: Nanami Kamimura|talkback]] | [[Special: Contributions/Nanami Kamimura|contribs]]</small> 16:34, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

262666 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-28 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.175132280E09 +++$+++ Am doing. After a cursory look, nothing jumps out\u2014except the fact it was quite well-written :) I'll read more thoroughly later, but right now I can't fault it on anything major. I thought of perhaps breaking \"Life\" up into \"Personal life\" and \"Work\", but that doesn't seem like much of an idea; it might make those sections too short.  +++$+++ Am doing. After a cursory look, nothing jumps out—except the fact it was quite well-written :) I'll read more thoroughly later, but right now I can't fault it on anything major. I thought of perhaps breaking "Life" up into "Personal life" and "Work", but that doesn't seem like much of an idea; it might make those sections too short. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 18:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
262667 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262666 +++$+++ 262666 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.175133300E09 +++$+++ Catching up on the guidelines is always a good idea :)  +++$+++ :Catching up on the guidelines is always a good idea :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 18:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
262668 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262666 +++$+++ 262667 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.175138640E09 +++$+++ Glad to have helped. I'll have to check my dictionary now, that was force of habit (and my spell-checker, set to U.S. English)  +++$+++ ::Glad to have helped. I'll have to check my dictionary now, that was force of habit (and my spell-checker, set to U.S. English) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 20:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

262669 +++$+++ SatyrTN +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-02 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.175504160E09 +++$+++ There's some discussion going on regarding Cite News and the other cite templates on [[Template talk:Cite news|that talk page]].  Would love your input :) -- <span style=\"background-color: #EECCFF;\"> +++$+++ There's some discussion going on regarding Cite News and the other cite templates on [[Template talk:Cite news|that talk page]].  Would love your input :) -- <span style="background-color: #EECCFF;">[[User:SatyrTN|SatyrTN]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:SatyrTN|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SatyrTN|contribs]])</span></span> 01:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
262670 +++$+++ Phil Boswell +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262669 +++$+++ 262669 +++$+++ 2007-04-02 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.175547480E09 +++$+++ Please see my reply to the ongoing discussion: the very '''last''' thing we want is people charging off in all directions using their own \"pet\" styles for citations. We want to get the various citation templates in such a condition that '''anybody''' can use them to produce useful citations, rather than placing further artificial restrictions and limiting citation to those \"experts\" who \"know how to format citations correctly\". We need to stop trying to follow any particular existing \"Manual of Style\" and synthesise our own: why else did the various \"Manuals\" come into being other than the particular needs of the originating situation? HTH HAND \u2014 +++$+++ :Please see my reply to the ongoing discussion: the very '''last''' thing we want is people charging off in all directions using their own "pet" styles for citations. We want to get the various citation templates in such a condition that '''anybody''' can use them to produce useful citations, rather than placing further artificial restrictions and limiting citation to those "experts" who "know how to format citations correctly". We need to stop trying to follow any particular existing "Manual of Style" and synthesise our own: why else did the various "Manuals" come into being other than the particular needs of the originating situation? HTH HAND —[[User:Phil Boswell|Phil]] | [[User talk:Phil Boswell|Talk]] 13:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

262671 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.175811180E09 +++$+++ OK, I admit that I got distracted because of all of my travel; can we try to finish this up and poll for consensus?  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28medicine-related_articles%29#Historical_.3F]   +++$+++ OK, I admit that I got distracted because of all of my travel; can we try to finish this up and poll for consensus?  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28medicine-related_articles%29#Historical_.3F]  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
262672 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262671 +++$+++ 262671 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.176421320E09 +++$+++ OK, enough procrastinating from me :-)  Have you noticed that I *really* hate working on policy pages ? <grin> I'd much rather edit and review articles.  I'm going to settle in to my upstairs computer and catch up on this thing, finally.   +++$+++ :OK, enough procrastinating from me :-)  Have you noticed that I *really* hate working on policy pages ? <grin> I'd much rather edit and review articles.  I'm going to settle in to my upstairs computer and catch up on this thing, finally.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

529 +++$+++ 220.255.178.29 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 529 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-25 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.264443540E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/220.255.178.29|220.255.178.29]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/220.255.178.29|220.255.178.29]] ([[User talk:220.255.178.29|talk]]) 10:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
530 +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ NeoChaosX +++$+++ 529 +++$+++ 529 +++$+++ 2010-01-25 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.264458360E09 +++$+++ Because you didn't supply references for the criticisms you listed. Per the sites' [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]] policy, any information that can be challenged has to be backed up by a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] that is cited in writing. If there is no source supplied, the material added can be removed. Find some reliable sources to cite on the issues you brought up, and what you wrote can stand.  +++$+++ :Because you didn't supply references for the criticisms you listed. Per the sites' [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]] policy, any information that can be challenged has to be backed up by a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] that is cited in writing. If there is no source supplied, the material added can be removed. Find some reliable sources to cite on the issues you brought up, and what you wrote can stand. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|edits]])</font> 14:26, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

524818 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524818 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-11 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.200106500E09 +++$+++ Hi again, AnonEMouse. I've just added several [[AVN (magazine)|AVN (magazine)]] reviews\/profiles, but for some reason the links aren't working. Since it's (I think) a print source as well, the reference is still valid. But is there a trick to linking to the online source?  +++$+++ Hi again, AnonEMouse. I've just added several [[AVN (magazine)|AVN (magazine)]] reviews/profiles, but for some reason the links aren't working. Since it's (I think) a print source as well, the reference is still valid. But is there a trick to linking to the online source? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 18:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
524819 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524818 +++$+++ 524818 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.200106740E09 +++$+++ Looking at your recent edit history, the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Yuki_Asuka&diff=prev&oldid=183679223 link you added to Yuki Asuka], for example, worked for me.  -- +++$+++ : Looking at your recent edit history, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yuki_Asuka&diff=prev&oldid=183679223 link you added to Yuki Asuka], for example, worked for me.  --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
524820 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524818 +++$+++ 524819 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.200107340E09 +++$+++ OK-- must just be this computer. Thanks.  +++$+++ :: OK-- must just be this computer. Thanks. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 19:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
524821 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524818 +++$+++ 524820 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.200107760E09 +++$+++ That said, I'm not sure that every review of every film a star has appeared in is a good use of external links. Just from sheer numbers, I know Japanese stars appear in fewer films than American stars, but still, ten films, each reviewed in two magazines, that's twenty external links, and the content isn't usually very focused on the single actor our article is supposed to be about. -- +++$+++ ::: That said, I'm not sure that every review of every film a star has appeared in is a good use of external links. Just from sheer numbers, I know Japanese stars appear in fewer films than American stars, but still, ten films, each reviewed in two magazines, that's twenty external links, and the content isn't usually very focused on the single actor our article is supposed to be about. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 19:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
524822 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524818 +++$+++ 524821 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.200108360E09 +++$+++ Well, on these particular subjects (Suzi Suzuki excepted), these are Japanese films being reviewed in an English-language source-- pretty rare, and, I would think, some indication of international notability. Also the films are not likely to get their own articles, and most (not all) of the reviews do carry on quite a bit about the actress in question, since she's the star attraction. About Suzuki though, I've long thought she does not belong in Category Japanese porn stars. She's an actress of Japanese (I think) descent who appears in U.S. porn. These ethnic\/nationality issues get sticky though, and removing her from the category might set off some kind of a squabbling storm...  +++$+++ :::: Well, on these particular subjects (Suzi Suzuki excepted), these are Japanese films being reviewed in an English-language source-- pretty rare, and, I would think, some indication of international notability. Also the films are not likely to get their own articles, and most (not all) of the reviews do carry on quite a bit about the actress in question, since she's the star attraction. About Suzuki though, I've long thought she does not belong in Category Japanese porn stars. She's an actress of Japanese (I think) descent who appears in U.S. porn. These ethnic/nationality issues get sticky though, and removing her from the category might set off some kind of a squabbling storm... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 19:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

532 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 532 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-07 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.289115180E09 +++$+++ You're quite right. I have removed both existing spam links. By the way, you should place your messages at the bottom of talk pages, as that is where editors will look for them.  +++$+++ You're quite right. I have removed both existing spam links. By the way, you should place your messages at the bottom of talk pages, as that is where editors will look for them. [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:33, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
533 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 532 +++$+++ 532 +++$+++ 2010-01-07 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.262928660E09 +++$+++ OK. Best.  +++$+++ :OK. Best. [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 21:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

515031 +++$+++ Ronz +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-21 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.240304400E09 +++$+++ Situation unravelling quickly.  -- +++$+++ Situation unravelling quickly.  --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 02:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
515032 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515031 +++$+++ 515031 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.240304700E09 +++$+++ I'd take it to AfD and let the community determine notability or not. Don't try to take it on your own shoulders. - +++$+++ :I'd take it to AfD and let the community determine notability or not. Don't try to take it on your own shoulders. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 02:05, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
515033 +++$+++ Ronz +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515031 +++$+++ 515032 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.240306200E09 +++$+++ Sounds good.  I'm going to make a suggestion to the upset editor. -- +++$+++ ::Sounds good.  I'm going to make a suggestion to the upset editor. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 02:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

535 +++$+++ 78.149.71.17 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 535 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-31 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.264924980E09 +++$+++ Example..[[Special:Contributions\/78.149.71.17|78.149.71.17]] ( +++$+++ Example..[[Special:Contributions/78.149.71.17|78.149.71.17]] ([[User talk:78.149.71.17|talk]]) 00:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
536 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 535 +++$+++ 535 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 11:13:00 +++$+++ 1.265224380E09 +++$+++ Hope this helps, Cheers,  +++$+++ : Hope this helps, Cheers, [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 11:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

524824 +++$+++ Junebug52 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524824 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-11 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.200121020E09 +++$+++ AnonEMouse, if I wanted to change my user name, how would I go about it? I can't seem to find innfo that would help me to accomplish this. I keep being mistaken for a woman because of the name and thought I would change it to something a little more masculine LOL.  +++$+++ AnonEMouse, if I wanted to change my user name, how would I go about it? I can't seem to find innfo that would help me to accomplish this. I keep being mistaken for a woman because of the name and thought I would change it to something a little more masculine LOL. [[User:Junebug52|Junebug52]] 22:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
524825 +++$+++ Junebug52 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524824 +++$+++ 524824 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.200122040E09 +++$+++ Nevermind my friend, I found it. If it would have been a snake, it would have bit me!  +++$+++ :Nevermind my friend, I found it. If it would have been a snake, it would have bit me! [[User:Junebug52|Junebug52]] 23:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

537 +++$+++ Iss246 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-13 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.266050460E09 +++$+++ I did not enter the vandalism you removed. Please check the history of the edits at the site, and retract your statement. +++$+++ I did not enter the vandalism you removed. Please check the history of the edits at the site, and retract your statement.[[User:Iss246|Iss246]] ([[User talk:Iss246|talk]]) 00:41, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
538 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 537 +++$+++ 537 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.266070380E09 +++$+++ I think it is you who should check the history. I reverted vandalism by 208.93.60.193 9 (an education facility in Texas who are now banned for a year) and RE-INSTATED your edit. Please read my edit summary again - slowly. +++$+++ : I think it is you who should check the history. I reverted vandalism by 208.93.60.193 9 (an education facility in Texas who are now banned for a year) and RE-INSTATED your edit. Please read my edit summary again - slowly.[[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 06:13, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

262682 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-08 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.178617200E09 +++$+++ Marco responded by creating a prototype [[User:MarcoTolo\/Sandbox\/Poliomyelitis_test|Poliomyelitis]] test page in his userspace with an accompanying [[User:MarcoTolo\/Sandbox\/History_of_poliomyelitis_test|History of poliomyelitis]] article. When you get a chance could you take a look at the prototypes and let us know what you think? Our ongoing discussion can be found [[User talk:MarcoTolo#Welcome back Marco!|here]]. Thanks again for your input.-- +++$+++ Marco responded by creating a prototype [[User:MarcoTolo/Sandbox/Poliomyelitis_test|Poliomyelitis]] test page in his userspace with an accompanying [[User:MarcoTolo/Sandbox/History_of_poliomyelitis_test|History of poliomyelitis]] article. When you get a chance could you take a look at the prototypes and let us know what you think? Our ongoing discussion can be found [[User talk:MarcoTolo#Welcome back Marco!|here]]. Thanks again for your input.--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 02:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
262683 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262682 +++$+++ 262682 +++$+++ 2007-05-10 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.178831280E09 +++$+++ Colin, I'm going to be traveling over Mother's Day, so will try to focus on this next week.  Insinuations on the Project talk page are beginning to bother me, so best I work on it later.  Best,  +++$+++ :Colin, I'm going to be traveling over Mother's Day, so will try to focus on this next week.  Insinuations on the Project talk page are beginning to bother me, so best I work on it later.  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 14:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

539 +++$+++ Iss246 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 539 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-13 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.266107640E09 +++$+++ You are right. I apologize. +++$+++ You are right. I apologize.[[User:Iss246|Iss246]] ([[User talk:Iss246|talk]]) 16:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
540 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 539 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.266107760E09 +++$+++ Accepted, but please be more careful in future.  +++$+++ :: Accepted, but please be more careful in future. [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 16:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

262684 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-16 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.179365160E09 +++$+++ Any of that sound strikingly familiar (broke the last link because it's blacklisted :-)   +++$+++ Any of that sound strikingly familiar (broke the last link because it's blacklisted :-)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
262685 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262684 +++$+++ 262684 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.179450960E09 +++$+++ Polish - yikes ! I know someone who will help with articles; give me a list of the ones you want.  I haven't yet read Kushner, so not sure yet what his POV is ... I can't wait :-)  Have you seen the [[Schizophrenia]] FAR?  One to watch, in terms of interplay between psych and medicine on MEDMOS.  I re-did the TOC to agree with MEDMOS, because all of their content basically conformed anyway &mdash; just needed better organization.   +++$+++ :Polish - yikes ! I know someone who will help with articles; give me a list of the ones you want.  I haven't yet read Kushner, so not sure yet what his POV is ... I can't wait :-)  Have you seen the [[Schizophrenia]] FAR?  One to watch, in terms of interplay between psych and medicine on MEDMOS.  I re-did the TOC to agree with MEDMOS, because all of their content basically conformed anyway &mdash; just needed better organization.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
262686 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262684 +++$+++ 262685 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.179450960E09 +++$+++ Wait a minute; didn't we already correspond about who could help with articles?  Gosh darn memory ...  +++$+++ ::Wait a minute; didn't we already correspond about who could help with articles?  Gosh darn memory ... [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
262687 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262684 +++$+++ 262686 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.179451200E09 +++$+++ Yes, but there's no point in both of us asking for the same papers. I thought you might have some already. I'll draw up a list.  +++$+++ :::Yes, but there's no point in both of us asking for the same papers. I thought you might have some already. I'll draw up a list. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
262688 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262684 +++$+++ 262687 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.179452820E09 +++$+++ I have the ones that you listed on the article talk page &mdash; somewhere 'round here ...  +++$+++ ::::I have the ones that you listed on the article talk page &mdash; somewhere 'round here ... [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:47, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

541 +++$+++ Wildhartlivie +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-27 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.267259280E09 +++$+++ And did he say why the French won't allow him to own one or whether Paradis owns one? The sources say he bought it for Paradis. Perhaps citizenship has something to do with him not owning it.  +++$+++ And did he say why the French won't allow him to own one or whether Paradis owns one? The sources say he bought it for Paradis. Perhaps citizenship has something to do with him not owning it. [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 00:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
542 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 541 +++$+++ 541 +++$+++ 2010-02-27 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.267260000E09 +++$+++ No, he didn't. Your explanation is possible, but it seems to me to be splitting hairs; even if he bought it and she legally owns it,  they both live there - so why the denial?   +++$+++ :No, he didn't. Your explanation is possible, but it seems to me to be splitting hairs; even if he bought it and she legally owns it,  they both live there - so why the denial?  [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

544 +++$+++ DarkPhoenix +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-07 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.267971900E09 +++$+++ Your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bread&diff=342274631&oldid=342262493 recent edit] of the [[Bread]] article shows that you corrupted the Gothic characters in it. Be aware of this potential problem in your future edits.  +++$+++ Your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bread&diff=342274631&oldid=342262493 recent edit] of the [[Bread]] article shows that you corrupted the Gothic characters in it. Be aware of this potential problem in your future edits. [[User:DarkPhoenix|DarkPhoenix]] ([[User talk:DarkPhoenix|talk]]) 06:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
545 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 544 +++$+++ 544 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.267994220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pointing it out. However, in over 7,000 edits it's never happened before. It was just a straight reversion, so have you any idea of how or why it happened?  +++$+++ : Thanks for pointing it out. However, in over 7,000 edits it's never happened before. It was just a straight reversion, so have you any idea of how or why it happened? [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 12:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
546 +++$+++ DarkPhoenix +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 544 +++$+++ 545 +++$+++ 2010-03-08 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.268085840E09 +++$+++ It seems that it could be a problem with either [[Wikipedia:Twinkle|Twinkle]] or with the MediaWiki reversion mechanism \u2014 It has already [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bread&diff=348432836&oldid=348432659 happened again] on the Bread article by another Twinkle user doing a revert.  +++$+++ :: It seems that it could be a problem with either [[Wikipedia:Twinkle|Twinkle]] or with the MediaWiki reversion mechanism — It has already [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bread&diff=348432836&oldid=348432659 happened again] on the Bread article by another Twinkle user doing a revert. [[User:DarkPhoenix|DarkPhoenix]] ([[User talk:DarkPhoenix|talk]]) 14:04, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
547 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 544 +++$+++ 546 +++$+++ 2010-03-08 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.268085960E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's what I thought. +++$+++ :::Yes, that's what I thought.[[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 14:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

524834 +++$+++ Dwanyewest +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524834 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-28 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.201592940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dwanyewest|Dwanyewest]] ([[User talk:Dwanyewest|talk]]) 23:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
524835 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524834 +++$+++ 524834 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.201213440E09 +++$+++ Being used as a reference doesn't make a source notable in itself. Being a reference source means you write useful, reliable, information. Notable means other sources write about you. They're not quite the same things. Will look. -- +++$+++ : Being used as a reference doesn't make a source notable in itself. Being a reference source means you write useful, reliable, information. Notable means other sources write about you. They're not quite the same things. Will look. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
524836 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524834 +++$+++ 524835 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.201216080E09 +++$+++ I also looked at Alexa, which [http:\/\/www.alexa.com\/data\/details\/traffic_details\/xfanz.com says] traffic rank of 97,260 Avn.com has a traffic rank of 16,282 [http:\/\/alexa.com\/data\/details\/traffic_details\/avn.com]. Even Lukeisback.com has a traffic rank of 33,667 [http:\/\/alexa.com\/data\/details\/traffic_details\/lukeisback.com]. That's not nearly as important as people writing about you, though. Get two reasonable, indepth, articles, more than two paragraphs long, from even alternative sources, ''[[Village Voice]]'', or ''[[LA Weekly]]'', or ''[[Phoenix New Times]]'' or even pornographic sources, such as ''[[Adult Video News]]'' or ''[[Hustler]]'' or ''[[Playboy]]'', written by an actual author, not just a reprinted press release, and I will argue that Xfanz deserves a Wikipedia article. -- +++$+++ :: I also looked at Alexa, which [http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/xfanz.com says] traffic rank of 97,260 Avn.com has a traffic rank of 16,282 [http://alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/avn.com]. Even Lukeisback.com has a traffic rank of 33,667 [http://alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/lukeisback.com]. That's not nearly as important as people writing about you, though. Get two reasonable, indepth, articles, more than two paragraphs long, from even alternative sources, ''[[Village Voice]]'', or ''[[LA Weekly]]'', or ''[[Phoenix New Times]]'' or even pornographic sources, such as ''[[Adult Video News]]'' or ''[[Hustler]]'' or ''[[Playboy]]'', written by an actual author, not just a reprinted press release, and I will argue that Xfanz deserves a Wikipedia article. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

262691 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262691 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-20 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.179650520E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.medscape.com\/viewarticle\/554333_print Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: A Review]   +++$+++ [http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/554333_print Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: A Review]  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
262692 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262691 +++$+++ 262691 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.179784860E09 +++$+++ I just skimmed the TOC\/Index of Kushner (planning to read it on my trip in ten days), and I'm disappointed already.  The most important current controversy (1980s) was the Comings affair, well covered in numerous articles and books, and Kushner only devotes one page (206) to the entire mess.  That's not a good sign.   +++$+++ :I just skimmed the TOC/Index of Kushner (planning to read it on my trip in ten days), and I'm disappointed already.  The most important current controversy (1980s) was the Comings affair, well covered in numerous articles and books, and Kushner only devotes one page (206) to the entire mess.  That's not a good sign.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

262693 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262693 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-24 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.180074420E09 +++$+++ Thank you for this, and ''all'' of your help with the polio articles, they are much improved by your guidance. I hope they continue to blossom. Cheers!-- +++$+++ Thank you for this, and ''all'' of your help with the polio articles, they are much improved by your guidance. I hope they continue to blossom. Cheers!--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 23:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
262694 +++$+++ MarcoTolo +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262693 +++$+++ 262693 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.180074720E09 +++$+++ Let me second the above - ''very'' impressive. Thanks for taking the time to make (in my opinion) the model \"List of X disease survivors\" article: Concise-yet-through introduction, well-organized, and, of course, extensively referenced. Excellent work. --  +++$+++ :Let me second the above - ''very'' impressive. Thanks for taking the time to make (in my opinion) the model "List of X disease survivors" article: Concise-yet-through introduction, well-organized, and, of course, extensively referenced. Excellent work. -- [[User:MarcoTolo|MarcoTolo]] 23:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
262695 +++$+++ MarcoTolo +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262693 +++$+++ 262694 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.180074960E09 +++$+++ Okay, this really deserves a Barnstar....and here it is. --  +++$+++ ::Okay, this really deserves a Barnstar....and here it is. -- [[User:MarcoTolo|MarcoTolo]] 23:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
262696 +++$+++ Dagoldman +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262693 +++$+++ 262693 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.180136520E09 +++$+++ What a great job! The polio survivor list is REALLY well written.  +++$+++ :What a great job! The polio survivor list is REALLY well written. [[User:Dagoldman|Dagoldman]] 16:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
262697 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262693 +++$+++ 262696 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.180137420E09 +++$+++ I of course will keep an eye on it (I put the red link on my watchlist some time ago in fact.) The reason I asked about the bio sourcing thing was that I might pop in and source some of the bios myself, I didn't want to duplicate your efforts. I have to ask, aside the \"yellow book\" reference it says \"Public domain text, used with permission and thanks\" I sense a good story there?-- +++$+++ ::I of course will keep an eye on it (I put the red link on my watchlist some time ago in fact.) The reason I asked about the bio sourcing thing was that I might pop in and source some of the bios myself, I didn't want to duplicate your efforts. I have to ask, aside the "yellow book" reference it says "Public domain text, used with permission and thanks" I sense a good story there?--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 16:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
262698 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262693 +++$+++ 262697 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.180157760E09 +++$+++ I've done some searching and have come up with a big pile of names all with Wikipedia articles that mention having polio. It will take me ages to go through them and I'm a bit worn out and can't face doing them all on my own. I think this list could definitely be an FL. The only thing holding it back is ensuring it is comprehensive. Would you guys be interested in helping? If so, I can post the list on the talk page along with some hints 'n' tips for searching for sources.  +++$+++ :::I've done some searching and have come up with a big pile of names all with Wikipedia articles that mention having polio. It will take me ages to go through them and I'm a bit worn out and can't face doing them all on my own. I think this list could definitely be an FL. The only thing holding it back is ensuring it is comprehensive. Would you guys be interested in helping? If so, I can post the list on the talk page along with some hints 'n' tips for searching for sources. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
262699 +++$+++ MarcoTolo +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262693 +++$+++ 262698 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.180158120E09 +++$+++ Sure - count me in. --  +++$+++ ::::Sure - count me in. -- [[User:MarcoTolo|MarcoTolo]] 22:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
262700 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262693 +++$+++ 262699 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.180172520E09 +++$+++ Me too, I would be happy to help.-- +++$+++ :::::Me too, I would be happy to help.--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 02:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

550 +++$+++ Mark83 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-08 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.289272800E09 +++$+++ I'm 100% with you that it's a bad image but I just don't get your edit summary that it's too old. Based on that logic we better get Winston Churchill's picture off Wikipedia ;)  +++$+++ I'm 100% with you that it's a bad image but I just don't get your edit summary that it's too old. Based on that logic we better get Winston Churchill's picture off Wikipedia ;) [[User:Mark83|Mark83]] ([[User talk:Mark83|talk]]) 19:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
551 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 550 +++$+++ 550 +++$+++ 2010-11-08 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.289275920E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't like to have a more up-to-date image of Churchill though :)  +++$+++ : I wouldn't like to have a more up-to-date image of Churchill though :) [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 20:12, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

552 +++$+++ Andy Dingley +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-01 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.291234620E09 +++$+++ You might be interested in [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#The_Howling_Sea]].  +++$+++ You might be interested in [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#The_Howling_Sea]]. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 12:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
553 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 552 +++$+++ 552 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.291235520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that. I've reported it as a potential conflict of interest, but as I'm not too sure of the criteria used I await the outcome with interest. (Personally, I think it's a clear case of self-promotion.) Cheers  +++$+++ :Thanks for that. I've reported it as a potential conflict of interest, but as I'm not too sure of the criteria used I await the outcome with interest. (Personally, I think it's a clear case of self-promotion.) Cheers [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 12:32, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
554 +++$+++ Andy Dingley +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 552 +++$+++ 553 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.291252620E09 +++$+++ Possibly that too, although I'd see them as separate issues anyway. Personally I don't mind COI too much: so long as it extends to a better depth of knowledge and doesn't breach other policies, I'm happy to have people directly connected writing the content they're best suited for. COI here would presumably affect The Howling Sea itself, the spam issue is about inbound links to it. I'd love to see more of those from East End and folk music articles, but the commutative issue is what really concerns me. I don't want a Brunel article that lists every song written about big steam-powered hats!  +++$+++ :: Possibly that too, although I'd see them as separate issues anyway. Personally I don't mind COI too much: so long as it extends to a better depth of knowledge and doesn't breach other policies, I'm happy to have people directly connected writing the content they're best suited for. COI here would presumably affect The Howling Sea itself, the spam issue is about inbound links to it. I'd love to see more of those from East End and folk music articles, but the commutative issue is what really concerns me. I don't want a Brunel article that lists every song written about big steam-powered hats! [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 17:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
555 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 552 +++$+++ 554 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.291254840E09 +++$+++ We seem to be approaching this from different angles; I from the article itself, and you from the internal spam links to it. As an avowed inclusionist I too don't have much of a problem with COI except where, as in this case, there are no verifiable external references to back it up. As for them being separate issues I appreciate that  we are urged to assume good faith, but it can't be entirely coincidental that two separate editors are concerned with the same subject at the same time. Best.  +++$+++ ::: We seem to be approaching this from different angles; I from the article itself, and you from the internal spam links to it. As an avowed inclusionist I too don't have much of a problem with COI except where, as in this case, there are no verifiable external references to back it up. As for them being separate issues I appreciate that  we are urged to assume good faith, but it can't be entirely coincidental that two separate editors are concerned with the same subject at the same time. Best. [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 17:54, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

556 +++$+++ Muhandes +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-01 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.296611280E09 +++$+++ Hi there. The reason I added Roundhouse to the lead of Village lock-up was [[Roundhouse (lock-up)]] which redirects there. Since \"[roundhouse]s were something completely different\", would you say that this redirect is incorrect? Should it be removed? -- +++$+++ Hi there. The reason I added Roundhouse to the lead of Village lock-up was [[Roundhouse (lock-up)]] which redirects there. Since "[roundhouse]s were something completely different", would you say that this redirect is incorrect? Should it be removed? --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]) 17:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
557 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 556 +++$+++ 556 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.296630720E09 +++$+++ If you can find  a source anywhere please feel free to add it. Best.  +++$+++ : If you can find  a source anywhere please feel free to add it. Best. [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 23:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
558 +++$+++ Muhandes +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 556 +++$+++ 557 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.296634200E09 +++$+++ Actually, it's already in the article's lead, but not as roundhouse but as \"round-house\", and Oxford is the source. That makes the redirect much more plausible. Best regards and happy editing. -- +++$+++ :: Actually, it's already in the article's lead, but not as roundhouse but as "round-house", and Oxford is the source. That makes the redirect much more plausible. Best regards and happy editing. --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]) 00:10, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
559 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 556 +++$+++ 558 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.296674400E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see now, it's a local nickname, which is probably why I haven't heard of it. (Note to self - read the article properly before you reply next time.) The redirect is OK then, but IMHO roundhouse still doesn't warrant a special mention in the lede over the other nick-names. Cheers  +++$+++ :::Ah, I see now, it's a local nickname, which is probably why I haven't heard of it. (Note to self - read the article properly before you reply next time.) The redirect is OK then, but IMHO roundhouse still doesn't warrant a special mention in the lede over the other nick-names. Cheers [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 11:20, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
560 +++$+++ Muhandes +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 556 +++$+++ 559 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.296677040E09 +++$+++ Yes, I agree. I should have also looked better at the article before adding it. Best regards. -- +++$+++ ::::Yes, I agree. I should have also looked better at the article before adding it. Best regards. --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]) 12:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

262701 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-26 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.180238280E09 +++$+++ The hints 'n' tips essay is [[User:Colin\/Medical lists of people|here]].  +++$+++ The hints 'n' tips essay is [[User:Colin/Medical lists of people|here]]. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
262702 +++$+++ Lou Sander +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262701 +++$+++ 262701 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.180326480E09 +++$+++ Truly a wonderful article. VERY interesting to me (I remember traveling through polio epidemic areas in the southern U.S. in the late 40s and early 50s). The only notable polio survivor I knew of before reading this was FDR, and it turns out he probably didn't have the disease. I also didn't realize that many of those iron lung people got well enough to get out of the lung. I have a minor suggestion: \"contracted polio\" is, IMHO, better wording than \"caught polio,\" and more in keeping with the authoritative nature of the article.  +++$+++ :Truly a wonderful article. VERY interesting to me (I remember traveling through polio epidemic areas in the southern U.S. in the late 40s and early 50s). The only notable polio survivor I knew of before reading this was FDR, and it turns out he probably didn't have the disease. I also didn't realize that many of those iron lung people got well enough to get out of the lung. I have a minor suggestion: "contracted polio" is, IMHO, better wording than "caught polio," and more in keeping with the authoritative nature of the article. [[User:Lou Sander|Lou Sander]] 21:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

524846 +++$+++ Prisonnet +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-09 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.152508920E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Prisonnet|Prisonnet]] 22:22, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
524847 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524846 +++$+++ 524846 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.152510840E09 +++$+++ Response [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3APrisonnet&diff=62951043&oldid=61329185 here]. -- +++$+++ :Response [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APrisonnet&diff=62951043&oldid=61329185 here]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

262703 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262703 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-28 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.180367340E09 +++$+++ As for [[Autism]], you're right that the existing \"Epidemiology\" section and that the subarticle [[Autism (incidence)]] are in pretty bad shape. However, fixing them would be a major job and I doubt whether I have time to fix this any time soon.  +++$+++ As for [[Autism]], you're right that the existing "Epidemiology" section and that the subarticle [[Autism (incidence)]] are in pretty bad shape. However, fixing them would be a major job and I doubt whether I have time to fix this any time soon. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] 08:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
262704 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262703 +++$+++ 262703 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 04:20:00 +++$+++ 1.180437600E09 +++$+++ I followed up to your query on the talk page (and suggested some more work for you, sorry\u2026). As for the name, I don't have a strong preference either way but posted the naming statistics I found.  +++$+++ :I followed up to your query on the talk page (and suggested some more work for you, sorry…). As for the name, I don't have a strong preference either way but posted the naming statistics I found. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] 04:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

561 +++$+++ Master of Puppets +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-08 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.297207320E09 +++$+++ I assume [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:194.9.188.21&diff=next&oldid=412730668 this] was a misclick? :P  +++$+++ I assume [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:194.9.188.21&diff=next&oldid=412730668 this] was a misclick? :P [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<span style="color:#7d7d7d">m.o.p</span>]] 15:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
562 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 561 +++$+++ 561 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.297215960E09 +++$+++ Yes, we clicked at the same time and, as you can see, it was rectified immediately. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:194.9.188.21&diff=next&oldid=412731012] Best.   +++$+++ : Yes, we clicked at the same time and, as you can see, it was rectified immediately. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:194.9.188.21&diff=next&oldid=412731012] Best.  [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 17:46, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
563 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 561 +++$+++ 561 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.297283280E09 +++$+++ I hope I have explained why we cannot allow links such as yours, and trust that you will not attempt to place it on the site again.  +++$+++ :I hope I have explained why we cannot allow links such as yours, and trust that you will not attempt to place it on the site again. [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 12:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

262707 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-15 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.181906640E09 +++$+++ I went back through all three versions, salvaging the good edits, removing the errors, and rebuilding the rest.  I still need to finish two missing pieces, which I can do easily, if you think I'm on the right track.  I believe it's important to explain the factors that affect prevalence before introducing the numbers, so I organized the content that way.  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:SandyGeorgia\/Sandbox2#Rebuild.2C_repair]   +++$+++ I went back through all three versions, salvaging the good edits, removing the errors, and rebuilding the rest.  I still need to finish two missing pieces, which I can do easily, if you think I'm on the right track.  I believe it's important to explain the factors that affect prevalence before introducing the numbers, so I organized the content that way.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SandyGeorgia/Sandbox2#Rebuild.2C_repair]  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 04:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
262708 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262707 +++$+++ 262707 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.182852780E09 +++$+++ [[History of Tourette syndrome]] needs an opening sentence that utilizes the article title; I've never been able to come up with something.  It's yours :-)   +++$+++ *[[History of Tourette syndrome]] needs an opening sentence that utilizes the article title; I've never been able to come up with something.  It's yours :-)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

564 +++$+++ Nczempin +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-08 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.302303180E09 +++$+++ Hi, you reverted a rvv on [[Radio]]. \"Wireless\" is correct, which will hopefully be obvious if you read the section. You didn't provide a reason for your rv, so if you insist it should be \"wired\", we can discuss it here or on the article's talk page. --  +++$+++ Hi, you reverted a rvv on [[Radio]]. "Wireless" is correct, which will hopefully be obvious if you read the section. You didn't provide a reason for your rv, so if you insist it should be "wired", we can discuss it here or on the article's talk page. -- [[User:Nczempin|Nczempin]] ([[User talk:Nczempin|talk]]) 15:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
565 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ Jongleur100 +++$+++ 564 +++$+++ 564 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.302325320E09 +++$+++ Hi. Yes, of course you're right that it should be 'wireless'. I'm not quite sure how that happened, as I didn't knowingly revert. (I almost always give an edit summary when I do.) I can only think that this happened accidentally when I was playing around with my new Internet Tablet. The keys are VERY small and it's quite easy to click on the wrong one. I'll be more careful in future. Best.  +++$+++ : Hi. Yes, of course you're right that it should be 'wireless'. I'm not quite sure how that happened, as I didn't knowingly revert. (I almost always give an edit summary when I do.) I can only think that this happened accidentally when I was playing around with my new Internet Tablet. The keys are VERY small and it's quite easy to click on the wrong one. I'll be more careful in future. Best. [[User:Jongleur100|  <font style="color:#990000;">'''''♦ Jongleur<sup>100</sup> ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jongleur100|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 22:02, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

568 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-27 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.288232820E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I award you with this shining star for your quality work on the articles related to the [[Russian economy]], an increasingly important topic area.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you with this shining star for your quality work on the articles related to the [[Russian economy]], an increasingly important topic area. [[User:Greyhood|<font color="darkgrey">Grey</font><font color="grey">Hood</font>]] [[User talk:Greyhood|<font color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 19:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
569 +++$+++ Offliner +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 568 +++$+++ 568 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.288239480E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I really appreciate this.  +++$+++ :Thanks, I really appreciate this. [[User:Offliner|Offliner]] ([[User talk:Offliner#top|talk]]) 21:18, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

570 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 570 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-05 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.289005380E09 +++$+++ }}  -- ''' +++$+++ }}  -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 18:03, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
571 +++$+++ EdJohnston +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 570 +++$+++ 570 +++$+++ 2010-11-19 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.290225360E09 +++$+++ Never mind. I'm going through all your complaints individually to see what the conclusion should be.  +++$+++ :Never mind. I'm going through all your complaints individually to see what the conclusion should be. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:56, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

524383 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-15 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.189843200E09 +++$+++ An anon has added persondata metadata giving her real name, citing [http:\/\/www.ocweekly.com\/features\/sex-issue\/local-girl-gone-gonzo\/24515\/ this] as a source. Good enough? (Seems kinda [[WP:SPS]] to me, but we need some latitude for porn articles.)  +++$+++ An anon has added persondata metadata giving her real name, citing [http://www.ocweekly.com/features/sex-issue/local-girl-gone-gonzo/24515/ this] as a source. Good enough? (Seems kinda [[WP:SPS]] to me, but we need some latitude for porn articles.) [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 01:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
524384 +++$+++ Tabercil +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524383 +++$+++ 524383 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.189847400E09 +++$+++ Well [[OC Weekly]] seems to be a legit mag. So I'd say keep it.  +++$+++ *Well [[OC Weekly]] seems to be a legit mag. So I'd say keep it. [[User:Tabercil|Tabercil]] 02:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
524385 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524383 +++$+++ 524384 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.189891560E09 +++$+++ Seems to be some edit-warring happening there over the issue.  +++$+++ ** Seems to be some edit-warring happening there over the issue. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 14:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
524386 +++$+++ Tabercil +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524383 +++$+++ 524385 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.189894500E09 +++$+++ I've spotted it...  +++$+++ ***I've spotted it... [[User:Tabercil|Tabercil]] 15:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
524387 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524383 +++$+++ 524386 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.189898640E09 +++$+++ I gave him a 3rr warning, will keep an eye on things as well. I'm neutral about the real name, will stay out of that part.  +++$+++ ****I gave him a 3rr warning, will keep an eye on things as well. I'm neutral about the real name, will stay out of that part. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 16:24, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
524388 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524383 +++$+++ 524387 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.189919160E09 +++$+++ It appears from a link on the talk page that the given source was using Wikipedia as a reference. I think [[Ouroboros]] must have posted the real name originally.  +++$+++ *****It appears from a link on the talk page that the given source was using Wikipedia as a reference. I think [[Ouroboros]] must have posted the real name originally. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 22:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

573 +++$+++ Asperchu +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-06 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.291653780E09 +++$+++ But in all of Chechnya, but especially (mostly) beyond Chechnya, so Mr. Gollia's allegation must refer to some local group in northern Chechnya (maybe actually existing, but probably not). -- +++$+++ But in all of Chechnya, but especially (mostly) beyond Chechnya, so Mr. Gollia's allegation must refer to some local group in northern Chechnya (maybe actually existing, but probably not). --[[User:Asperchu|Asperchu]] ([[User talk:Asperchu|talk]]) 08:43, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
574 +++$+++ Offliner +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 573 +++$+++ 573 +++$+++ 2010-12-06 08:47:00 +++$+++ 1.291654020E09 +++$+++ I know, but I couldn't figure out in exactly what article to put it. I think [[Caucasus Emirate]] is the closest; isn't it a kind of general name for all the various Islamists trying to establish an Islamist republic in the Caucasus?  +++$+++ :I know, but I couldn't figure out in exactly what article to put it. I think [[Caucasus Emirate]] is the closest; isn't it a kind of general name for all the various Islamists trying to establish an Islamist republic in the Caucasus? [[User:Offliner|Offliner]] ([[User talk:Offliner#top|talk]]) 08:47, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

262718 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-12 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.184289720E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for your detailed review of [[Autism]]'s lead; it's much stronger now. I finally finished editing it in response and left some comments in [[Wikipedia:Peer_review\/Autism#Comments_by_Colin]].  +++$+++ Thanks very much for your detailed review of [[Autism]]'s lead; it's much stronger now. I finally finished editing it in response and left some comments in [[Wikipedia:Peer_review/Autism#Comments_by_Colin]]. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] 18:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
262719 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262718 +++$+++ 262718 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.184590320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the further edits and comments. I left some followup comments in [[Wikipedia:Peer_review\/Autism#Comments_by_Colin]].  +++$+++ :Thanks for the further edits and comments. I left some followup comments in [[Wikipedia:Peer_review/Autism#Comments_by_Colin]]. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] 05:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
262720 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262718 +++$+++ 262718 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.184761980E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your comments on [[Autism]], this time through section [[Autism#Treatment]]. I managed to catch up with you finally, fixing things as I went alone, and left some responses in [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Autism#Comments by Colin]].  +++$+++ :Thanks again for your comments on [[Autism]], this time through section [[Autism#Treatment]]. I managed to catch up with you finally, fixing things as I went alone, and left some responses in [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Autism#Comments by Colin]]. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] 05:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
262721 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262718 +++$+++ 262718 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.184822340E09 +++$+++ Thanks yet again for your comments on [[Autism#Epidemiology]]. I left some responses in [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Autism#Comments by Colin]].  +++$+++ :Thanks yet again for your comments on [[Autism#Epidemiology]]. I left some responses in [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Autism#Comments by Colin]]. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] 22:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
262722 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262718 +++$+++ 262718 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.185493380E09 +++$+++ Further review on [[Autism]] would be most welcome. But I wasn't the one who created a link to Ben Goldacre's [http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/life\/badscience\/story\/0,,2128859,00.html article]; perhaps you left me a message that you intended for someone else?  +++$+++ :Further review on [[Autism]] would be most welcome. But I wasn't the one who created a link to Ben Goldacre's [http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/badscience/story/0,,2128859,00.html article]; perhaps you left me a message that you intended for someone else? [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] 16:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
262723 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262718 +++$+++ 262722 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.185498300E09 +++$+++ You're right, it was me. I had remembered the article but not my linking to it. Too many autism articles lately; sorry for wasting your time.  +++$+++ ::You're right, it was me. I had remembered the article but not my linking to it. Too many autism articles lately; sorry for wasting your time. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] 18:05, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
262724 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262718 +++$+++ 262718 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.185540000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your further comments on [[Autism#Epidemiology]]. I left some responses in [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Autism#Comments by Colin]].  +++$+++ :Thanks for your further comments on [[Autism#Epidemiology]]. I left some responses in [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Autism#Comments by Colin]]. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] 05:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

524863 +++$+++ Mateo SA +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-27 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.111995840E09 +++$+++ Hi. I've looked back at what I wrote when I reverted your revert, and I've realized that what I wrote probably sounded hostile. I didn't mean to do that and I apologize. I've looked over that issue some more and I'm planning to put up some more ideas about it, which I hope you'll look over. Thanks. &mdash;  +++$+++ Hi. I've looked back at what I wrote when I reverted your revert, and I've realized that what I wrote probably sounded hostile. I didn't mean to do that and I apologize. I've looked over that issue some more and I'm planning to put up some more ideas about it, which I hope you'll look over. Thanks. &mdash; [[User:Mateo SA|Mateo SA]] | [[User talk:Mateo SA|talk]] 23:44, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
524864 +++$+++ Male1979 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524863 +++$+++ 524863 +++$+++ 2005-04-06 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.112796840E09 +++$+++ Hi, Arcadian! I put a comment on the discussion page for Kyoiku kanji. I understand you are the main guy there so, please, tell me what you think. I'll be glad if we find an agreement and make some changes together.  +++$+++ *Hi, Arcadian! I put a comment on the discussion page for Kyoiku kanji. I understand you are the main guy there so, please, tell me what you think. I'll be glad if we find an agreement and make some changes together. [[User:Male1979|Ben]] [[User talk:Male1979|(talk)]] 07:14, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
524865 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524863 +++$+++ 524863 +++$+++ 2005-04-06 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.112820300E09 +++$+++ I really like the new template on these pages! By the way, I'm not an expert on the topic; I just saw the need for the article so I adapted the material from the French Wikipedia the best I could. Anyways, per your questions -- for pages like [[Roku (kanji)]], I don't want to express too strong an option, because I didn't work on those pages, but I'd lean towards keeping them in Wikipedia. Other characters (for example, [[A]]) have their own pages in Wikipedia. But for your other question, I agree with you that they're inconsistently linked, but I'm not sure what to recommend. One problem is that the page is already so long that it gets warnings when saved, so if more links are included, the problem will only get worse. I know this probably wasn't too helpful of a response, but I didn't want you to think I was ignoring you. Thanks for all your hard work on the pages, and I'm sure our paths will cross again soon. -- +++$+++ :I really like the new template on these pages! By the way, I'm not an expert on the topic; I just saw the need for the article so I adapted the material from the French Wikipedia the best I could. Anyways, per your questions -- for pages like [[Roku (kanji)]], I don't want to express too strong an option, because I didn't work on those pages, but I'd lean towards keeping them in Wikipedia. Other characters (for example, [[A]]) have their own pages in Wikipedia. But for your other question, I agree with you that they're inconsistently linked, but I'm not sure what to recommend. One problem is that the page is already so long that it gets warnings when saved, so if more links are included, the problem will only get worse. I know this probably wasn't too helpful of a response, but I didn't want you to think I was ignoring you. Thanks for all your hard work on the pages, and I'm sure our paths will cross again soon. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 13:45, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
524866 +++$+++ Male1979 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524863 +++$+++ 524865 +++$+++ 2005-04-06 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.112823480E09 +++$+++ First: I am very happy that you liked the template! Then you made a strong argument by providing the links. There IS a lot of information that can be\/should be on this kind of pages. As for the size of the pages, it doesn't matter (and anyway some <nowiki>[[ and ]]<\/nowiki>make just several kbs more). The size warning is a consideration for people with very slow connections and strange browsers. Most people here (my impression) think it's not really important, in fact many articles are much bigger. So, CU soon, when our paths will cross again.  +++$+++ ::First: I am very happy that you liked the template! Then you made a strong argument by providing the links. There IS a lot of information that can be/should be on this kind of pages. As for the size of the pages, it doesn't matter (and anyway some <nowiki>[[ and ]]</nowiki>make just several kbs more). The size warning is a consideration for people with very slow connections and strange browsers. Most people here (my impression) think it's not really important, in fact many articles are much bigger. So, CU soon, when our paths will cross again. [[User:Male1979|Ben]] [[User talk:Male1979|(talk)]] 14:38, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)

577 +++$+++ EdJohnston +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-06 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.291683480E09 +++$+++ Hello Offliner. You've included a diff of Piotrus at [[Peace of Riga]] in your complaint, but you have not given the required explanation of how this edit violates the editor's current restriction. (''\"Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation how these edits violate it\"''). I also take note that you haven't participated on the article's talk page. Piotrus made only one edit, and since he made it, an IP editor has reverted it.  The IP has opened a discussion on talk that appears sensible, at first sight. There are no further reverts. You'll need to give a stronger argument for why we should consider this as bad behavior on the part of Piotrus. Thank you,  +++$+++ Hello Offliner. You've included a diff of Piotrus at [[Peace of Riga]] in your complaint, but you have not given the required explanation of how this edit violates the editor's current restriction. (''"Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation how these edits violate it"''). I also take note that you haven't participated on the article's talk page. Piotrus made only one edit, and since he made it, an IP editor has reverted it.  The IP has opened a discussion on talk that appears sensible, at first sight. There are no further reverts. You'll need to give a stronger argument for why we should consider this as bad behavior on the part of Piotrus. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 16:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
578 +++$+++ Offliner +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 577 +++$+++ 577 +++$+++ 2010-12-06 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.291684500E09 +++$+++ There is no need for me to demonstrate any \"bad behaviour\" by Piotrus (other than the topic ban violation) or to be personally involved in the dispute and its discussions. I'm simply presenting a diff which I think is a clear topic ban violation for investigation. Piotrus is prohibited from editing anywhere near the topics of national and ethnic disputes in Eastern Europe. Arbitrator Coren specifically [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Amendment&diff=prev&oldid=388343856 warned] Piotrus not to even try to toe the line. The ArbCom's wish is clear: no violations are to be tolerated. The [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Peace_of_Riga&diff=prev&oldid=400442834 diff] is clearly about national and ethnic disputes in Eastern Europe (\"he Belarusian language was banned, in speaking and in literature, and local leadership was sent to a concentration camp at Bereza Kartuska\").  +++$+++ :There is no need for me to demonstrate any "bad behaviour" by Piotrus (other than the topic ban violation) or to be personally involved in the dispute and its discussions. I'm simply presenting a diff which I think is a clear topic ban violation for investigation. Piotrus is prohibited from editing anywhere near the topics of national and ethnic disputes in Eastern Europe. Arbitrator Coren specifically [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment&diff=prev&oldid=388343856 warned] Piotrus not to even try to toe the line. The ArbCom's wish is clear: no violations are to be tolerated. The [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peace_of_Riga&diff=prev&oldid=400442834 diff] is clearly about national and ethnic disputes in Eastern Europe ("he Belarusian language was banned, in speaking and in literature, and local leadership was sent to a concentration camp at Bereza Kartuska"). [[User:Offliner|Offliner]] ([[User talk:Offliner#top|talk]]) 17:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

524867 +++$+++ Sabine's Sunbird +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-05-17 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.116323520E09 +++$+++ PS I'm Sunbird, not Sabine. I simply belong to Sabine!  +++$+++ PS I'm Sunbird, not Sabine. I simply belong to Sabine! [[User:Sabine's Sunbird|Sabine's Sunbird]] 02:52, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
524868 +++$+++ Sabine's Sunbird +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524867 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-05-18 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.116402060E09 +++$+++ I've given it a start, and it's the best I can do at the moment. I'll try and do more later, but I had slated today to try and work on seabirds some more.  +++$+++ **I've given it a start, and it's the best I can do at the moment. I'll try and do more later, but I had slated today to try and work on seabirds some more. [[User:Sabine's Sunbird|Sabine's Sunbird]] 00:41, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

262727 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-13 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.184378340E09 +++$+++ Your excellent work on [[Timeline of tuberous sclerosis]] has popped up again on my Watchlist. I hereby grant you permission to [[WP:CANVASS|drop me a line]] when you send it to FLC. ;)  +++$+++ Your excellent work on [[Timeline of tuberous sclerosis]] has popped up again on my Watchlist. I hereby grant you permission to [[WP:CANVASS|drop me a line]] when you send it to FLC. ;) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 18:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
262728 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262727 +++$+++ 262727 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.184379540E09 +++$+++ P.S. Not to stick my nose in or anything (no time for that, unfortunately), wouldn't \"The timeline of tuberous sclerosis discovery and research stretches over less than 200 years\" sound better as \"The timeline of tuberous sclerosis discovery and research spans less than [or \"under\"] 200 years\"? It appears you want to emphasize that knowledge of the disease is rather recent. If I've misunderstood and you ''don't'' want to emphasize that, just ignore this :)  +++$+++ :P.S. Not to stick my nose in or anything (no time for that, unfortunately), wouldn't "The timeline of tuberous sclerosis discovery and research stretches over less than 200 years" sound better as "The timeline of tuberous sclerosis discovery and research spans less than [or "under"] 200 years"? It appears you want to emphasize that knowledge of the disease is rather recent. If I've misunderstood and you ''don't'' want to emphasize that, just ignore this :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 19:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
262729 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262727 +++$+++ 262728 +++$+++ 2007-07-14 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.184404740E09 +++$+++ Will look tomorrow. I owe Sandy a [[P\xf3voa de Varzim|review]] as well...  +++$+++ ::Will look tomorrow. I owe Sandy a [[Póvoa de Varzim|review]] as well... [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 02:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
262730 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262727 +++$+++ 262727 +++$+++ 2007-07-14 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.184479860E09 +++$+++ I hope you'll find my suggestions adequate\u2014if not, just ignore them ;) I'll read the timeline more thoroughly and comment at FLC tomorrow. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I hope you'll find my suggestions adequate—if not, just ignore them ;) I'll read the timeline more thoroughly and comment at FLC tomorrow. Cheers, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 23:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

437004 +++$+++ Aoi +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-13 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.110734580E09 +++$+++ Thank you for rewriting my recent contribution to the [[Iolani Barracks]] article. I didn't realize how disorganized it was until I read your subsequent edit and realized how much better your version flowed. In the future I will try to integrate my contributions so it won't disrupt the flow of articles. Thanks again.  +++$+++ Thank you for rewriting my recent contribution to the [[Iolani Barracks]] article. I didn't realize how disorganized it was until I read your subsequent edit and realized how much better your version flowed. In the future I will try to integrate my contributions so it won't disrupt the flow of articles. Thanks again. [[User:Aoi|Aoi]] 09:23, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
437005 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437004 +++$+++ 437004 +++$+++ 2005-03-13 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.110763920E09 +++$+++ Thanks Aoi. One of things I enjoy in life is editing. I was a terrible english student back when, so the fact I can do a reasonale job at it now amazes me.  But it comes from lots of practice and my writing lots of stuff that others had at with red pencil. What I'm saying is that these are skills any of us can learn, and learning by doing then seeing what others do with our contribution is an excellent way to improve. -  +++$+++ :Thanks Aoi. One of things I enjoy in life is editing. I was a terrible english student back when, so the fact I can do a reasonale job at it now amazes me.  But it comes from lots of practice and my writing lots of stuff that others had at with red pencil. What I'm saying is that these are skills any of us can learn, and learning by doing then seeing what others do with our contribution is an excellent way to improve. - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 17:32, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

586 +++$+++ Ezhiki +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 586 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Hi there! I am trying to work on the [[Kola Peninsula]] article to bring it to the GA status, and was wondering if you would be able\/willing to help me with the section about the economy. If the GA passes, it may help your WikiCup standing :) If not, that's fine too, but please let me know either way so I could plan accordingly. And of course, should you wish to work on any other section of that article, you are most welcome to! Cheers,\u2014 +++$+++ Hi there! I am trying to work on the [[Kola Peninsula]] article to bring it to the GA status, and was wondering if you would be able/willing to help me with the section about the economy. If the GA passes, it may help your WikiCup standing :) If not, that's fine too, but please let me know either way so I could plan accordingly. And of course, should you wish to work on any other section of that article, you are most welcome to! Cheers,—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); January&nbsp;19, 2011; 21:31 (UTC)
587 +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 586 +++$+++ 586 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.295502720E09 +++$+++ Yes, I'd love to help (and get potential points). What kind of material do you think the economy section should include? It seems to overlap a lot with that of [[Murmansk Oblast]]. I don't have much time this week, but the next week should be better.  +++$+++ :Yes, I'd love to help (and get potential points). What kind of material do you think the economy section should include? It seems to overlap a lot with that of [[Murmansk Oblast]]. I don't have much time this week, but the next week should be better. [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear#top|talk]]) 21:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
588 +++$+++ Ezhiki +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 586 +++$+++ 587 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I'm not really looking at this week; I myself still have plenty of work to do on that article. Regarding the kind of material to include, anything specific to the peninsula (and not to the whole oblast) would be great. But separating the peninsula from the oblast, I guess, is the hard part :)\u2014 +++$+++ ::I'm not really looking at this week; I myself still have plenty of work to do on that article. Regarding the kind of material to include, anything specific to the peninsula (and not to the whole oblast) would be great. But separating the peninsula from the oblast, I guess, is the hard part :)—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); January&nbsp;19, 2011; 21:55 (UTC)

262731 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262731 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-14 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.184399460E09 +++$+++ Found one!  Coming up on the main page this week:  [[:Template:Holden timeline]]  My idea is world events across the top, with a row for each significant country (and better colors).  Whatdya think?   +++$+++ Found one!  Coming up on the main page this week:  [[:Template:Holden timeline]]  My idea is world events across the top, with a row for each significant country (and better colors).  Whatdya think?  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:51, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
262732 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262731 +++$+++ 262731 +++$+++ 2007-07-17 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.184731140E09 +++$+++ Found a better one, colored, easy to do ... [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Par%C3%A2kramab%C3%A2hu_I#Coronation_and_defeat_of_Manabharana].   +++$+++ :Found a better one, colored, easy to do ... [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Par%C3%A2kramab%C3%A2hu_I#Coronation_and_defeat_of_Manabharana].  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

524876 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524876 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-05 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.120599540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 5 July 2005 14:39 (UTC)
524877 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524876 +++$+++ 524876 +++$+++ 2005-07-05 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.120616640E09 +++$+++ Strictly speaking, do you think the box needs at the top? I'm open to persuation either way, but many articles have images at the top that would be cluttered with a box. On the other hand: where else would we put it?  +++$+++ :Strictly speaking, do you think the box needs at the top? I'm open to persuation either way, but many articles have images at the top that would be cluttered with a box. On the other hand: where else would we put it? [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 5 July 2005 19:24 (UTC)

592 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-30 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.296379200E09 +++$+++ Hello! I've nominated the 2011 [[World Economic Forum]] on ITN, as well as the joint development of the [[Black Sea shelf]] by [[Rosneft]] and [[ExxonMobil]], and that of the [[Russian continental shelf|Arctic shelf]] by [[Rosneft]] and [[British Petroleum|BP]], which was announced during the Forum. Could you help me with updating the four related articles: [[World Economic Forum]] (the section ''Deals'' is needed), [[Rosneft]], [[ExxonMobil]] and [[British Petroleum]]?  +++$+++ Hello! I've nominated the 2011 [[World Economic Forum]] on ITN, as well as the joint development of the [[Black Sea shelf]] by [[Rosneft]] and [[ExxonMobil]], and that of the [[Russian continental shelf|Arctic shelf]] by [[Rosneft]] and [[British Petroleum|BP]], which was announced during the Forum. Could you help me with updating the four related articles: [[World Economic Forum]] (the section ''Deals'' is needed), [[Rosneft]], [[ExxonMobil]] and [[British Petroleum]]? [[User:Greyhood|<font color="darkgrey">Grey</font><font color="grey">Hood</font>]] [[User talk:Greyhood|<font color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 01:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
593 +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 592 +++$+++ 592 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.296381180E09 +++$+++ Updating Wikipedia on a night shift? Does this mean I will get a barnstar which is 30% bigger than usual? ;) But seriously, this is interesting news, so I'll see what I can do.  +++$+++ :Updating Wikipedia on a night shift? Does this mean I will get a barnstar which is 30% bigger than usual? ;) But seriously, this is interesting news, so I'll see what I can do. [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear#top|talk]]) 01:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
594 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 592 +++$+++ 593 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.296381900E09 +++$+++ Well, I've had a hope that night comes to your place later than to mine ;) Anyway, the Forum concludes later on January 30, so there is enough time for update in the next two days. There is a consensus on posting the Forum conclusion, while the oil companies part is still questionable. The updates could be copied between the articles, though, and all four could be updated as easily as one of them. I'll also return to this task tomorrow, just thought it would be interesting to you since it involves some of your favourite topics.  +++$+++ ::Well, I've had a hope that night comes to your place later than to mine ;) Anyway, the Forum concludes later on January 30, so there is enough time for update in the next two days. There is a consensus on posting the Forum conclusion, while the oil companies part is still questionable. The updates could be copied between the articles, though, and all four could be updated as easily as one of them. I'll also return to this task tomorrow, just thought it would be interesting to you since it involves some of your favourite topics. [[User:Greyhood|<font color="darkgrey">Grey</font><font color="grey">Hood</font>]] [[User talk:Greyhood|<font color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 02:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
595 +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 592 +++$+++ 594 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.296388440E09 +++$+++ I have updated [[Rosneft]]. But are you sure the arctic shelf deal was signed during the World Economic Forum? I could not immediately find any sources saying it was signed at Davos. Due to this, I only copied the ExxonMobil deal to the forum article and not the BP one.  +++$+++ :::I have updated [[Rosneft]]. But are you sure the arctic shelf deal was signed during the World Economic Forum? I could not immediately find any sources saying it was signed at Davos. Due to this, I only copied the ExxonMobil deal to the forum article and not the BP one. [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear#top|talk]]) 03:54, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
596 +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 592 +++$+++ 594 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.296389580E09 +++$+++ Btw, I think [http:\/\/www.themoscowtimes.com\/news\/article\/russia-no-3-in-oil-transparency\/418977.html this] is interesting and probably worth a mention in some article.  +++$+++ :::Btw, I think [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/russia-no-3-in-oil-transparency/418977.html this] is interesting and probably worth a mention in some article. [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear#top|talk]]) 04:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
597 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 592 +++$+++ 596 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.296417360E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/rian.ru\/economy\/20110126\/326653613.html As this Russian source] says, on the Forum BP and Rosneft signed a deal on \"strategic cooperation\" and \"in development of the strategic alliance of the two oil companies on the joint development of the Arctic, achieved two weeks ago in London\". Also, as far as I understand, they announced more details of their cooperation in the Arctic and other places.  +++$+++ ::::[http://rian.ru/economy/20110126/326653613.html As this Russian source] says, on the Forum BP and Rosneft signed a deal on "strategic cooperation" and "in development of the strategic alliance of the two oil companies on the joint development of the Arctic, achieved two weeks ago in London". Also, as far as I understand, they announced more details of their cooperation in the Arctic and other places. [[User:Greyhood|<font color="darkgrey">Grey</font><font color="grey">Hood</font>]] [[User talk:Greyhood|<font color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 11:56, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
598 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 592 +++$+++ 596 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.296417600E09 +++$+++ And yes, thanks for the updates! I'll see what credits to give you...  +++$+++ ::::And yes, thanks for the updates! I'll see what credits to give you... [[User:Greyhood|<font color="darkgrey">Grey</font><font color="grey">Hood</font>]] [[User talk:Greyhood|<font color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 12:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

262737 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-18 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.184812440E09 +++$+++ I'll run through again after you've completed the work you mentioned to Tony.  I'm wondering what you think about wikilinking hamartin and tuberin (or TSC1 and TSC2) to [[List of human genes]], since they don't have articles?  The introduction says there are four chapters (late 19th, early 20th, late 20th, and 21st centuries), but the article Table of Contents is organized around five chapters, which include a mid-20th century.  I'm never sure if we should add last access date on templated items like OMIM.   +++$+++ I'll run through again after you've completed the work you mentioned to Tony.  I'm wondering what you think about wikilinking hamartin and tuberin (or TSC1 and TSC2) to [[List of human genes]], since they don't have articles?  The introduction says there are four chapters (late 19th, early 20th, late 20th, and 21st centuries), but the article Table of Contents is organized around five chapters, which include a mid-20th century.  I'm never sure if we should add last access date on templated items like OMIM.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
262738 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262737 +++$+++ 262737 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.184822100E09 +++$+++ I was only planning to change the tense in a few locations, nothing major. I'm too tired to give it a decent go tonight. I'll look at your other suggestions tomorrow as well. [[List of human genes]] doesn't seem to be worth linking to IMO. I'd rather work with someone to create short hamartin\/tuberin articles. I could create a stub and then seek out some help.  +++$+++ :I was only planning to change the tense in a few locations, nothing major. I'm too tired to give it a decent go tonight. I'll look at your other suggestions tomorrow as well. [[List of human genes]] doesn't seem to be worth linking to IMO. I'd rather work with someone to create short hamartin/tuberin articles. I could create a stub and then seek out some help. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:15, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
262739 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262737 +++$+++ 262738 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.184877180E09 +++$+++ I've looked at creating articles for the proteins\/genes and have decided to ask for help before creation. I'm not sure whether to pick the gene or the protein. I've replaced the OMIM template with a full web citation template. The mid-20th century is a bonus chapter ;-). I'm not sure of the best way to split the sections (see the talk page). If there were short phrases for \"first half of the 20th century\"; \"second half of the 20th century\" then I'd go for that.  +++$+++ ::I've looked at creating articles for the proteins/genes and have decided to ask for help before creation. I'm not sure whether to pick the gene or the protein. I've replaced the OMIM template with a full web citation template. The mid-20th century is a bonus chapter ;-). I'm not sure of the best way to split the sections (see the talk page). If there were short phrases for "first half of the 20th century"; "second half of the 20th century" then I'd go for that. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 13:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

43790 +++$+++ Andy F +++$+++ Stavros1 +++$+++ 43790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-01 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.270153560E09 +++$+++ Hi '''Stavros''', well done with [[The Lizard lifeboat station]]. I have now corrected the long and lat coords to point to the station in the cove. Re you familiar with this tool http:\/\/pagesperso-orange.fr\/universimmedia\/geo\/loc.htm for finding accurate coords?  +++$+++ Hi '''Stavros''', well done with [[The Lizard lifeboat station]]. I have now corrected the long and lat coords to point to the station in the cove. Re you familiar with this tool http://pagesperso-orange.fr/universimmedia/geo/loc.htm for finding accurate coords? [[User:Andy F|Andy F]] ([[User talk:Andy F|talk]]) 13:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
43791 +++$+++ Andy F +++$+++ Stavros1 +++$+++ 43790 +++$+++ 43790 +++$+++ 2010-04-02 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.270243380E09 +++$+++ Hi again '''Stavros''', thanks for your reply. It would be great if you could contribute more on lifeboat stations in Cornwall. Good luck with the coord tool  +++$+++ : Hi again '''Stavros''', thanks for your reply. It would be great if you could contribute more on lifeboat stations in Cornwall. Good luck with the coord tool [[User:Andy F|Andy F]] ([[User talk:Andy F|talk]]) 14:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

530726 +++$+++ Fences and windows +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530726 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-25 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.259216760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your question at my RfA, it was much better than the usual \"what the difference between a ban and a block\" type questions. Thanks for the support too, I appreciate it.  +++$+++ Thanks for your question at my RfA, it was much better than the usual "what the difference between a ban and a block" type questions. Thanks for the support too, I appreciate it. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:grey;">&amp;</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 22:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
530727 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530726 +++$+++ 530726 +++$+++ 2009-11-25 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.259220240E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! I wanted to see how you'd react; I figured someone with deletion experience would breeze through it - like you did. I saw the article recently come up on my watchlist and I figured I'd ask the question again to someone to make sure that we admins think things a little before we just blindly hit the delete button on a speedy delete. It's good to ask at a relevant WikiProject if one applies. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome! I wanted to see how you'd react; I figured someone with deletion experience would breeze through it - like you did. I saw the article recently come up on my watchlist and I figured I'd ask the question again to someone to make sure that we admins think things a little before we just blindly hit the delete button on a speedy delete. It's good to ask at a relevant WikiProject if one applies. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

599 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-30 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.296433320E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your timely contributions and your willingness to help even in the midst of night. Maybe this award is not 30% bigger than usual, but it does contain 10 times more barnstars than usual!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your timely contributions and your willingness to help even in the midst of night. Maybe this award is not 30% bigger than usual, but it does contain 10 times more barnstars than usual! [[User:Greyhood|<font color="darkgrey">Grey</font><font color="grey">Hood</font>]] [[User talk:Greyhood|<font color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 16:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
600 +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 599 +++$+++ 599 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.296456900E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot!  +++$+++ :Thanks a lot! [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear#top|talk]]) 22:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

262744 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262744 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-26 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.185507060E09 +++$+++ I'ts been a long haul, and [[Timeline of tuberous sclerosis]] now has a star well deserved !  +++$+++ I'ts been a long haul, and [[Timeline of tuberous sclerosis]] now has a star well deserved ! [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
262745 +++$+++ MarcoTolo +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262744 +++$+++ 262744 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.185510660E09 +++$+++ Seconded - outstanding work (as usual), Colin. --  +++$+++ :Seconded - outstanding work (as usual), Colin. -- [[User:MarcoTolo|MarcoTolo]] 21:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
262746 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262744 +++$+++ 262745 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.185511620E09 +++$+++ Thirded - great job, on a tough subject. -- +++$+++ ::Thirded - great job, on a tough subject. --[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 21:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
262747 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262744 +++$+++ 262746 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.185517920E09 +++$+++ And mine :) You're welcome\u2014I wish I'd helped more.  +++$+++ :::And mine :) You're welcome—I wish I'd helped more. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 23:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
262748 +++$+++ NCurse +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262744 +++$+++ 262747 +++$+++ 2007-07-30 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.185846480E09 +++$+++ You're most welcome, Colin! :)  +++$+++ ::::You're most welcome, Colin! :) [[User:NCurse|NCurse]] <sub> [[User talk:NCurse|work]]</sub> 18:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

602 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-03 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.296778560E09 +++$+++ It was my intention to ask you to sign up later, when I've done with the transfer of my old to-do lists to the page. But since now you are signed in, I expect you may start some work for the project right now. Also, me and Ezhiki have planned to set up [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia\/Economy of Russia task force]] as the next aim, and pour most of contents of [[User:Greyhood\/ToDo|my giant to-do list]] there. If you like, you may start the project yourself, copying the existing page infrastructure from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia\/Science and technology in Russia task force]] and starting to fill the to-do list in a way you find appropriate. Since it was you who actually drawn me into editing Russian economy articles on Wikipedia, I'd like you to start that page, while I could join the editing when I finish my work with S&T.  +++$+++ It was my intention to ask you to sign up later, when I've done with the transfer of my old to-do lists to the page. But since now you are signed in, I expect you may start some work for the project right now. Also, me and Ezhiki have planned to set up [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Economy of Russia task force]] as the next aim, and pour most of contents of [[User:Greyhood/ToDo|my giant to-do list]] there. If you like, you may start the project yourself, copying the existing page infrastructure from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Science and technology in Russia task force]] and starting to fill the to-do list in a way you find appropriate. Since it was you who actually drawn me into editing Russian economy articles on Wikipedia, I'd like you to start that page, while I could join the editing when I finish my work with S&T. [[User:Greyhood|<font color="darkgrey">Grey</font><font color="grey">Hood</font>]] [[User talk:Greyhood|<font color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 16:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
603 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 602 +++$+++ 602 +++$+++ 2011-02-03 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.296778560E09 +++$+++ Also, we may start [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia\/Politics of Russia task force]], and few more projects, namely History, Geography and Culture, and then the whole range of topics will be well-covered. I'm not a great expert in politics, and I was planning to ask either you or [[User:Russavia]] to start the politics task force. What do you think about this idea?  +++$+++ :Also, we may start [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Politics of Russia task force]], and few more projects, namely History, Geography and Culture, and then the whole range of topics will be well-covered. I'm not a great expert in politics, and I was planning to ask either you or [[User:Russavia]] to start the politics task force. What do you think about this idea? [[User:Greyhood|<font color="darkgrey">Grey</font><font color="grey">Hood</font>]] [[User talk:Greyhood|<font color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 16:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
604 +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 602 +++$+++ 603 +++$+++ 2011-02-05 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.296947280E09 +++$+++ I'll think about creating the politics and economy task forces. I think the main advantage of the task forces is synchronizing and merging everyone's to-do lists. But I will probably have little time the next two weeks.  +++$+++ ::I'll think about creating the politics and economy task forces. I think the main advantage of the task forces is synchronizing and merging everyone's to-do lists. But I will probably have little time the next two weeks. [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear#top|talk]]) 15:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

605 +++$+++ GW_Simulations +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 605 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-21 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.298314920E09 +++$+++ You are right that Glonass-K1 is a separate type of satellite, however the instance which you changed in [[2011 in spaceflight]] was referring to a K1 satellite. The designation Glonass-K is no longer used; K1 refers to the prototypes, and K2 the operational satellites. --''''' +++$+++ You are right that Glonass-K1 is a separate type of satellite, however the instance which you changed in [[2011 in spaceflight]] was referring to a K1 satellite. The designation Glonass-K is no longer used; K1 refers to the prototypes, and K2 the operational satellites. --'''''[[User:GW Simulations|<font color="#115566">G</font>]][[User talk:GW_Simulations|<font color="#496636">W</font>]]'''''[[Special:Contributions/GW_Simulations|…]] 11:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
606 +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 605 +++$+++ 605 +++$+++ 2011-02-21 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.298315160E09 +++$+++ What's the source for this? All the sources I've seen call the first satellite a GLONASS-K satellite, and it's not a prototype.  +++$+++ :What's the source for this? All the sources I've seen call the first satellite a GLONASS-K satellite, and it's not a prototype. [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear#top|talk]]) 11:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
607 +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 605 +++$+++ 605 +++$+++ 2011-02-21 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.298315340E09 +++$+++ The manufacturer calls it [http:\/\/www.iss-reshetnev.ru\/?cid=news&nid=1124 GLONASS-K No. 11].  +++$+++ :The manufacturer calls it [http://www.iss-reshetnev.ru/?cid=news&nid=1124 GLONASS-K No. 11]. [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear#top|talk]]) 11:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
608 +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 605 +++$+++ 607 +++$+++ 2011-02-21 11:23:00 +++$+++ 1.298316180E09 +++$+++ I found [http:\/\/findarticles.com\/p\/articles\/mi_m0BPW\/is_10_21\/ai_n56309362\/ a source] in which a Roscosmos officials says there is a division to K1 and K2. Although the K1 seems to be a fully operational satellite. As long as all the official sources (Reshetnev, Roscosmos, RIA Novosti, etc.) use GLONASS-K instead of GLONASS-K1, that's what I'm going to use too.  +++$+++ ::I found [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BPW/is_10_21/ai_n56309362/ a source] in which a Roscosmos officials says there is a division to K1 and K2. Although the K1 seems to be a fully operational satellite. As long as all the official sources (Reshetnev, Roscosmos, RIA Novosti, etc.) use GLONASS-K instead of GLONASS-K1, that's what I'm going to use too. [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear#top|talk]]) 11:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
609 +++$+++ GW_Simulations +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 605 +++$+++ 608 +++$+++ 2011-02-21 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.298333160E09 +++$+++ I would say that Glonass-K is the collective\/programme name, and K1 and K2 are the individual types of spacecraft. --''''' +++$+++ :::I would say that Glonass-K is the collective/programme name, and K1 and K2 are the individual types of spacecraft. --'''''[[User:GW Simulations|<font color="#115566">G</font>]][[User talk:GW_Simulations|<font color="#496636">W</font>]]'''''[[Special:Contributions/GW_Simulations|…]] 16:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
610 +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 605 +++$+++ 609 +++$+++ 2011-02-21 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.298334540E09 +++$+++ It's realistic that Glonass-K will eventually have an improved version. But currently there seems to be only a single source (the Roscosmos official) who thinks the K1-K2 scheme will be used. All other sources which talk about the scheme base their information on this official. The manufacturer calls the first satellite GLONASS-K No. 11 and Roscosmos calls it just GLONASS-K, so even if the scheme will eventually be used, it has clearly not yet been adopted.  +++$+++ ::::It's realistic that Glonass-K will eventually have an improved version. But currently there seems to be only a single source (the Roscosmos official) who thinks the K1-K2 scheme will be used. All other sources which talk about the scheme base their information on this official. The manufacturer calls the first satellite GLONASS-K No. 11 and Roscosmos calls it just GLONASS-K, so even if the scheme will eventually be used, it has clearly not yet been adopted. [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear#top|talk]]) 16:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

524389 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-15 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.189902780E09 +++$+++ In the Controversies section, someone has removed the links to the articles written Monica Sj\xf6\xf6 and  Rabbi Yonassan Gershom, which now contain only the links the the Wikipedia articles about them.  +++$+++ In the Controversies section, someone has removed the links to the articles written Monica Sjöö and  Rabbi Yonassan Gershom, which now contain only the links the the Wikipedia articles about them. [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 17:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
524390 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524389 +++$+++ 524389 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.189919040E09 +++$+++ I restored the lost information, but it has been remove again. Could you explain to me what is necessary to have another RfC?, this time from the Biography Section. I really feel that more eyes on this article would be a big help, and certainly more unbiased views on the condition of the article would help too. Because, this argument has been going on so long it is becoming difficult to maintain perspective, and humor....  +++$+++ :I restored the lost information, but it has been remove again. Could you explain to me what is necessary to have another RfC?, this time from the Biography Section. I really feel that more eyes on this article would be a big help, and certainly more unbiased views on the condition of the article would help too. Because, this argument has been going on so long it is becoming difficult to maintain perspective, and humor.... [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 22:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
524391 +++$+++ Catherineyronwode +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524389 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-16 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.190009460E09 +++$+++ Just a note to second what Kwork said -- the Alice Bailey Edit War seems to be revving up for Game Three. The same persons are responsible. I have also done restorations. It is getting ugly. Sorry to be so needy, but the problem seems to be human, not informational. cat yronwode  +++$+++ :::Just a note to second what Kwork said -- the Alice Bailey Edit War seems to be revving up for Game Three. The same persons are responsible. I have also done restorations. It is getting ugly. Sorry to be so needy, but the problem seems to be human, not informational. cat yronwode [[User:Catherineyronwode|Catherineyronwode]] 23:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

524899 +++$+++  +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524899 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Pleased to make your acquaintance. I've finished the merge, per Talk:Intraparenchymal hemorrhage. However, this probably only should be a temporary merge, and once there's some significant content for Intraventricular hemorrhage, we could split them out onto two pages again. I just put a few sentences at Intra-axial_hematoma#Intraventricular_hemorrhages to get the ball rolling, but you might want to take a look at it when you get a chance. --Arcadian 21:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC) +++$+++ Pleased to make your acquaintance. I've finished the merge, per Talk:Intraparenchymal hemorrhage. However, this probably only should be a temporary merge, and once there's some significant content for Intraventricular hemorrhage, we could split them out onto two pages again. I just put a few sentences at Intra-axial_hematoma#Intraventricular_hemorrhages to get the ball rolling, but you might want to take a look at it when you get a chance. --Arcadian 21:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
524900 +++$+++ delldot +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524899 +++$+++ 524899 +++$+++ 2005-11-03 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.131088680E09 +++$+++ Hey, question: do you know where I can find a page on conventions about the references section?  e.g., whether to put the date after the name or at the end, whether to put the name of the article in quotes, whether to capitalize every word in the article name or just the first letter, etc?  Anyway, thanks for the contributions.  Peace,  +++$+++ :Hey, question: do you know where I can find a page on conventions about the references section?  e.g., whether to put the date after the name or at the end, whether to put the name of the article in quotes, whether to capitalize every word in the article name or just the first letter, etc?  Anyway, thanks for the contributions.  Peace, [[User:Delldot|Delldot]] 23:18, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

614 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-04 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.299282000E09 +++$+++ Hello! The article [[Mir]] was nominated for GA status. Do you think you could make the requested GA review [[Talk:Mir\/GA1|here]]?  +++$+++ Hello! The article [[Mir]] was nominated for GA status. Do you think you could make the requested GA review [[Talk:Mir/GA1|here]]? [[User:Greyhood|<font color="darkgrey">Grey</font><font color="grey">Hood</font>]] [[User talk:Greyhood|<font color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 15:40, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
615 +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 614 +++$+++ 614 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.299282180E09 +++$+++ Perhaps, if I have the time soon. It's a pretty long article to review. Thanks for notifying me.  +++$+++ :Perhaps, if I have the time soon. It's a pretty long article to review. Thanks for notifying me. [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear#top|talk]]) 15:43, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
616 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 614 +++$+++ 615 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.299282600E09 +++$+++ I've noticed this nomination among \"Article bot alerts\" on [[WP:RUSSIA]] page. Recently, the main project page has been updated by me, and I hope it will become more useful facility to work on Russia-related articles. And I think the project could do better with few more good articles.  +++$+++ ::I've noticed this nomination among "Article bot alerts" on [[WP:RUSSIA]] page. Recently, the main project page has been updated by me, and I hope it will become more useful facility to work on Russia-related articles. And I think the project could do better with few more good articles. [[User:Greyhood|<font color="darkgrey">Grey</font><font color="grey">Hood</font>]] [[User talk:Greyhood|<font color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 15:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

558679 +++$+++ Cohesion +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-19 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.176973680E09 +++$+++ You may have only done this once or twice, I dunno, but be sure to delete the links from articles when you delete images. It's a pain sometimes I know. Orphanbot helps out a lot on these, but not some categories that are more controversial. :) - ''' +++$+++ You may have only done this once or twice, I dunno, but be sure to delete the links from articles when you delete images. It's a pain sometimes I know. Orphanbot helps out a lot on these, but not some categories that are more controversial. :) - '''[[User:Cohesion|cohesion]]''' 02:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
558680 +++$+++  +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558679 +++$+++ 558679 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.176973740E09 +++$+++ I try. I know I've forgotten a few. =( <span style=\"white-space: nowrap\">\u2014  +++$+++ :I try. I know I've forgotten a few. =( <span style="white-space: nowrap">— [[User:Coelacan |coe<span style="font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>]][[ User talk:Coelacan |acan]]</span> — 02:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
558681 +++$+++ Cohesion +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558679 +++$+++ 558680 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.176978840E09 +++$+++ No worries, ever since firefox lets you search in text boxes my life has been a lot easier ;) - ''' +++$+++ ::No worries, ever since firefox lets you search in text boxes my life has been a lot easier ;) - '''[[User:Cohesion|cohesion]]''' 03:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

262247 +++$+++ Teancum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-29 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.291027740E09 +++$+++ I have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_article_review%2FPerfect_Dark%2Farchive1&action=historysubmit&diff=399446752&oldid=399445837 moved the discussion] to the article talk page and changed the tone slightly per your comment.  Sorry, this is my first FAR, and I must have skipped over or misread the part on taking it to the talk page first. -- +++$+++ I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_article_review%2FPerfect_Dark%2Farchive1&action=historysubmit&diff=399446752&oldid=399445837 moved the discussion] to the article talk page and changed the tone slightly per your comment.  Sorry, this is my first FAR, and I must have skipped over or misread the part on taking it to the talk page first. --[[User:Teancum|Teancum]] ([[User talk:Teancum|talk]]) 02:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
262248 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262247 +++$+++ 262247 +++$+++ 2010-11-29 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.291028280E09 +++$+++ Oh, very nice. Thank you for responding so quickly. My apologies if I was a bit short with you - for some reason I thought I'd seen you around the FAR board before and so knew the procedure :) As I said before, if no-one bites on the comments after a week, just retransclude.  +++$+++ :Oh, very nice. Thank you for responding so quickly. My apologies if I was a bit short with you - for some reason I thought I'd seen you around the FAR board before and so knew the procedure :) As I said before, if no-one bites on the comments after a week, just retransclude. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 02:58, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

174866 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ 174866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-09 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.294599240E09 +++$+++ Someone with a sour disposition (a Saints fan, perhaps?) deleted your entry:[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk\/Entertainment&diff=prev&oldid=406821628] I thought it was funny. And that game certainly was a stunning upset. \u2190 +++$+++ Someone with a sour disposition (a Saints fan, perhaps?) deleted your entry:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Entertainment&diff=prev&oldid=406821628] I thought it was funny. And that game certainly was a stunning upset. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 10:54, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
174867 +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ 174866 +++$+++ 174866 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.294634040E09 +++$+++ Oh well. It wasn't really appropriate to the refdesk anyway.  +++$+++ :Oh well. It wasn't really appropriate to the refdesk anyway. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend#top|talk]]) 20:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

623 +++$+++ Vecrumba +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 623 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-27 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.303943940E09 +++$+++ {{you've got mail}}  +++$+++ {{you've got mail}} [[User:Vecrumba|P<small>ЄTЄRS</small>&nbsp;<s>J</s>&nbsp;V]]<small> ►[[User_talk:Vecrumba|TALK]]</small> 15:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
624 +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 623 +++$+++ 623 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.303945200E09 +++$+++ I have refactored my comment since some people did not like it.  +++$+++ :I have refactored my comment since some people did not like it. [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear#top|talk]]) 16:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
625 +++$+++ Vecrumba +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 623 +++$+++ 624 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.303956180E09 +++$+++ Still needlessly refers to my (implied) lack of integrity but at least an improvement. \u0421\u043f\u0430\u0441\u0438\u0431\u043e.  +++$+++ :: Still needlessly refers to my (implied) lack of integrity but at least an improvement. Спасибо. [[User:Vecrumba|P<small>ЄTЄRS</small>&nbsp;<s>J</s>&nbsp;V]]<small> ►[[User_talk:Vecrumba|TALK]]</small> 19:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

262768 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262768 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-05 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.191634440E09 +++$+++ O.K. I have put my idea together at [[User:TonyTheTiger\/LOTD proposal]].  Toss me some comments before I try to make this an official proposal.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ O.K. I have put my idea together at [[User:TonyTheTiger/LOTD proposal]].  Toss me some comments before I try to make this an official proposal.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 18:34, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
262769 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262768 +++$+++ 262768 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.191640200E09 +++$+++ I sent out 3 feedback requests and got back two complexity complaints.  I am working on it, but it is a simple process.  Eligible FLs are nominated. People cast 3 votes. Votes are tallied. The winners become LOTDs.  Dates are then assigned.  It is not too hard to understand.  I will hopefully clean it up in the next few days so that it appears as simple as it is.    I think with 400 FLs and 40 new ones being produced a month (and probably more in the future), we should be able to come up with 30 a month.  We can repeat like POTD for a while if necessary.  I will try to clarify the procedure and get back to you.  As for the quality issue, I have produced 42 [[WP:DYK]]s.  If these can go on the upper part of the main page, we certainly have high enough quality content to go at the bottom.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :I sent out 3 feedback requests and got back two complexity complaints.  I am working on it, but it is a simple process.  Eligible FLs are nominated. People cast 3 votes. Votes are tallied. The winners become LOTDs.  Dates are then assigned.  It is not too hard to understand.  I will hopefully clean it up in the next few days so that it appears as simple as it is.    I think with 400 FLs and 40 new ones being produced a month (and probably more in the future), we should be able to come up with 30 a month.  We can repeat like POTD for a while if necessary.  I will try to clarify the procedure and get back to you.  As for the quality issue, I have produced 42 [[WP:DYK]]s.  If these can go on the upper part of the main page, we certainly have high enough quality content to go at the bottom.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 20:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
262770 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262768 +++$+++ 262769 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.191727080E09 +++$+++ O.K. My proposal is a lot leaner now.  I should say that I believe the current quality of [[WP:FL]]s is as good as [[WP:FA]]s when they started [[WP:TFA]].  I think this type of mechanism will increase the quality of [[WP:FL]]s by competition.  I am not sure I have addressed all your concerns, but reconsideration, feedback and advice would be appreciated.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::O.K. My proposal is a lot leaner now.  I should say that I believe the current quality of [[WP:FL]]s is as good as [[WP:FA]]s when they started [[WP:TFA]].  I think this type of mechanism will increase the quality of [[WP:FL]]s by competition.  I am not sure I have addressed all your concerns, but reconsideration, feedback and advice would be appreciated.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 20:18, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
262771 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262768 +++$+++ 262770 +++$+++ 2007-10-12 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.192230180E09 +++$+++ (copied from [[User talk:TonyTheTiger]]) I've moved the Survey\/Discussion to the talk page. I think the main page should focus on the proposed procedure rather than become a discussion page itself. Can I suggest that IMO it is way too early to call a survey (support\/oppose). I recommend you remove that section ASAP. This will free the discussion from becoming polarised. When it appears the proposal is heading somewhere positive, then call a survey to gauge the opinion.  +++$+++ :::(copied from [[User talk:TonyTheTiger]]) I've moved the Survey/Discussion to the talk page. I think the main page should focus on the proposed procedure rather than become a discussion page itself. Can I suggest that IMO it is way too early to call a survey (support/oppose). I recommend you remove that section ASAP. This will free the discussion from becoming polarised. When it appears the proposal is heading somewhere positive, then call a survey to gauge the opinion. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
262772 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262768 +++$+++ 262771 +++$+++ 2007-10-12 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.192231200E09 +++$+++ I think it is correct to move the discussion to the talk page.  Thank you.  I kind of disagres with \"it is way too early to call a survey (support\/oppose)\".  People at this point know if they want to see FLs on the main page in all likelihood.  We have a format for their inclusion based on [[WP:FC]] work done already.  I think the best way to get things moving is to call for opinions.  If people don't want to see FLs on the main page they can cast an oppose vote saying so.  I think the most likely ways for FLs on the main page proposal to get derailed is for people to start debating over whether the FC format is the best, whether we should do it daily like TFA or POTD, whether we should wait until later, etc. All of these are just votes against.  In all likelihood, people who want FLs on the main page will either want to do it similar to my way (democratically) or similar to TFA (autocratically).  I am just calling for a vote of persons who want to get going democratically. If they vote for my procedure it can be tweaked like anything else at WP.  I think votes to wait are just votes against us being on the mainpage or votes against a democratic procedure since we are so far beyond where TFA was when they started.  What would we wait for if we already have over a years worth of FLs and are producing more than 30\/month?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::I think it is correct to move the discussion to the talk page.  Thank you.  I kind of disagres with "it is way too early to call a survey (support/oppose)".  People at this point know if they want to see FLs on the main page in all likelihood.  We have a format for their inclusion based on [[WP:FC]] work done already.  I think the best way to get things moving is to call for opinions.  If people don't want to see FLs on the main page they can cast an oppose vote saying so.  I think the most likely ways for FLs on the main page proposal to get derailed is for people to start debating over whether the FC format is the best, whether we should do it daily like TFA or POTD, whether we should wait until later, etc. All of these are just votes against.  In all likelihood, people who want FLs on the main page will either want to do it similar to my way (democratically) or similar to TFA (autocratically).  I am just calling for a vote of persons who want to get going democratically. If they vote for my procedure it can be tweaked like anything else at WP.  I think votes to wait are just votes against us being on the mainpage or votes against a democratic procedure since we are so far beyond where TFA was when they started.  What would we wait for if we already have over a years worth of FLs and are producing more than 30/month?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 16:20, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
262773 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262768 +++$+++ 262772 +++$+++ 2007-10-12 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.192231320E09 +++$+++ P.S. I realize WP is not a democracy, but at times we do use one man one vote such as [[WP:RFA]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::::P.S. I realize WP is not a democracy, but at times we do use one man one vote such as [[WP:RFA]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 16:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
262774 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262768 +++$+++ 262773 +++$+++ 2007-10-12 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.192234260E09 +++$+++ I would not call those three points goals.  People against formatting per FC are just trying to make it undoable and should just come out and say they are against, IMO. People who don't want to do it democratically, want something totally different from what I am proposing and should vote against. People who don't want to do it daily don't truly want to expose the daily readers to WPs best work in a normal way like TFA and POTD do.  These people should just say they are satisfied with not being on the main page and vote against. I find it hard to believe someone who wants FLs on the main page and wants some sort of by collective consensus would vote against.  This is a proposal that should be close to what people who want FLs on the main page by collective choice should want.  I don't necessarily want a lot of discussion.  I would prefer 100 support votes and a motion to close debate.  You have a lot of skin in the game here because like me you have 3 FLs although I think yours have more subject overlap than mine do and should not be nominated in the same month.  I would think you probably think your work is deserving of main page exposure.  If so I think you should support this kind of approach.  I imagine there are many alternate voting procedures that would work.  However, a myriad of alternate plans is also a pretty good way to torpedo a proposal.  I would imagine extensive debate on alternate procedures would likely lead us astray from getting this thing going.  The table has actually been revised for LOTD format.  Note those are all lists in the table.  Would you like me to format one of your lists as an example?  It is of course possible that people would just like to see a list of nominees.  I think this however makes the first blush comparison easier.  Debate over whether a table with 500 characters per entry or just a list of list names should be shown is of course another way to bog down the progress.  I proposed it as it is because I think it will work.  If I had a month to nominate something, I would be able to summarize it in 500 characters and figure out which projects should take note of its candidacy.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::::I would not call those three points goals.  People against formatting per FC are just trying to make it undoable and should just come out and say they are against, IMO. People who don't want to do it democratically, want something totally different from what I am proposing and should vote against. People who don't want to do it daily don't truly want to expose the daily readers to WPs best work in a normal way like TFA and POTD do.  These people should just say they are satisfied with not being on the main page and vote against. I find it hard to believe someone who wants FLs on the main page and wants some sort of by collective consensus would vote against.  This is a proposal that should be close to what people who want FLs on the main page by collective choice should want.  I don't necessarily want a lot of discussion.  I would prefer 100 support votes and a motion to close debate.  You have a lot of skin in the game here because like me you have 3 FLs although I think yours have more subject overlap than mine do and should not be nominated in the same month.  I would think you probably think your work is deserving of main page exposure.  If so I think you should support this kind of approach.  I imagine there are many alternate voting procedures that would work.  However, a myriad of alternate plans is also a pretty good way to torpedo a proposal.  I would imagine extensive debate on alternate procedures would likely lead us astray from getting this thing going.  The table has actually been revised for LOTD format.  Note those are all lists in the table.  Would you like me to format one of your lists as an example?  It is of course possible that people would just like to see a list of nominees.  I think this however makes the first blush comparison easier.  Debate over whether a table with 500 characters per entry or just a list of list names should be shown is of course another way to bog down the progress.  I proposed it as it is because I think it will work.  If I had a month to nominate something, I would be able to summarize it in 500 characters and figure out which projects should take note of its candidacy.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 17:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
262775 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262768 +++$+++ 262774 +++$+++ 2007-10-13 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.192315800E09 +++$+++ It seems fairly ludicrous for you an editor of 3 FLs who started the opposition movement to say everyone who nominated and closed FLs would blindly vote for my proposal.  Those people happen to be the ones who are most concerned about the FL process.  There is no way FA is going to be involved in any FL on the main page process.  There were a few respondents who don't know how much excess demand to make the main page there is from FAs who think TFA might give up a couple days a week for FLs.  Not gonna happen.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::::::It seems fairly ludicrous for you an editor of 3 FLs who started the opposition movement to say everyone who nominated and closed FLs would blindly vote for my proposal.  Those people happen to be the ones who are most concerned about the FL process.  There is no way FA is going to be involved in any FL on the main page process.  There were a few respondents who don't know how much excess demand to make the main page there is from FAs who think TFA might give up a couple days a week for FLs.  Not gonna happen.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 15:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
262776 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262768 +++$+++ 262775 +++$+++ 2007-10-13 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.192317960E09 +++$+++ I am not saying you are against FLs on the main page.  I think most believe FLs should be on the main page.  If we were to take a straw poll of should FLs be on the main page, it would probably pass 80\/20 or better.  That is not my point.  Discussion shows three camps 1. Support for my democratic\/consensus selection process. 2. Support for a first in line\/calendar type process like POTD 3. Support for a dictatorial selection process like TFA.  You are pro first in line.  I am not looking for support from people who at some point in the distant future to have a dictatorial selection process or who want a first in line process.  I am looking for support for a democratic process.  If it goes down it goes down.  I could write you a dissertation with extensive calculus on why this is the mathematically most efficient process, but no one at WP would care.  I believe in a democratic and free market process.  My proposal for that is posted.  If you want first in line I don't want to modify my proposal to get your support.  I don't mind if it turns out that my idea is not supported.  I don't want analysis by paralysis by debating about the three types of processes.  Just tell me whether you would go along with mine or not.  I will move on to other things and let FLs on the main page die if people prefer other ways.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::::::I am not saying you are against FLs on the main page.  I think most believe FLs should be on the main page.  If we were to take a straw poll of should FLs be on the main page, it would probably pass 80/20 or better.  That is not my point.  Discussion shows three camps 1. Support for my democratic/consensus selection process. 2. Support for a first in line/calendar type process like POTD 3. Support for a dictatorial selection process like TFA.  You are pro first in line.  I am not looking for support from people who at some point in the distant future to have a dictatorial selection process or who want a first in line process.  I am looking for support for a democratic process.  If it goes down it goes down.  I could write you a dissertation with extensive calculus on why this is the mathematically most efficient process, but no one at WP would care.  I believe in a democratic and free market process.  My proposal for that is posted.  If you want first in line I don't want to modify my proposal to get your support.  I don't mind if it turns out that my idea is not supported.  I don't want analysis by paralysis by debating about the three types of processes.  Just tell me whether you would go along with mine or not.  I will move on to other things and let FLs on the main page die if people prefer other ways.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 16:26, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
262777 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262768 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-13 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.192319220E09 +++$+++ Yes a selective process (either democratic or dictatorial) would create a two-tier FL system of accepted and rejected FLs.  However, oddly you believe that there are some FLs that are main page worthy and some that are not.  One would hope a selective process would approximately agree on its division.  However, if you want to lead a non-selective first in line calendar movement, I may support, but that is not my proposal here.  It is not an unwillingness to compromise.  Putting ideas together that don't go together is not compromise.  I am not interested in a dictatorial process. A melding of a dictatorial and democratic process is not a compromise.  You either do one or the other, IMO.  A melding of a selective and a non-selective process is not a compromise.  I would be willing to compromise on the mechanics of a consensus based selection process.  If you would want to discuss some sort of compromise that would result in a consensus based selective process, I would be open to compromise on such a process.  However, the proposal here is for whether you are for a consensus based selective process.  Most people in support of such an idea realize that my idea could be tweaked.  If you are against a selective consensus based process then we can't come together.  Aside from a two-tier result what other significant concerns would you have with a consensus based selective process?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::::::::Yes a selective process (either democratic or dictatorial) would create a two-tier FL system of accepted and rejected FLs.  However, oddly you believe that there are some FLs that are main page worthy and some that are not.  One would hope a selective process would approximately agree on its division.  However, if you want to lead a non-selective first in line calendar movement, I may support, but that is not my proposal here.  It is not an unwillingness to compromise.  Putting ideas together that don't go together is not compromise.  I am not interested in a dictatorial process. A melding of a dictatorial and democratic process is not a compromise.  You either do one or the other, IMO.  A melding of a selective and a non-selective process is not a compromise.  I would be willing to compromise on the mechanics of a consensus based selection process.  If you would want to discuss some sort of compromise that would result in a consensus based selective process, I would be open to compromise on such a process.  However, the proposal here is for whether you are for a consensus based selective process.  Most people in support of such an idea realize that my idea could be tweaked.  If you are against a selective consensus based process then we can't come together.  Aside from a two-tier result what other significant concerns would you have with a consensus based selective process?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 16:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
262778 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262768 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-13 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.192320120E09 +++$+++ P.S. I think it is possible that persons thinking their work is less likely to succeed in a consensus based process might be against my idea.  I think it is likely that you may feel that your excellent work would not be likely to succeed in getting to the main page.  Is this your thinking?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::::::::::P.S. I think it is possible that persons thinking their work is less likely to succeed in a consensus based process might be against my idea.  I think it is likely that you may feel that your excellent work would not be likely to succeed in getting to the main page.  Is this your thinking?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 17:02, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

524392 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524392 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-17 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.190081040E09 +++$+++ AnonEMouse, it seems to me that the reference links in the section now called \"Charges of racism and antisemitism\" should go directly to the articles written by Monica Sj\xf6\xf6 and Yonassan Gershom, which it does not now. But I hesitate to change it because I think that might make problems with the reference system in place. Is there a way to do that without making a general mess of things?  +++$+++ AnonEMouse, it seems to me that the reference links in the section now called "Charges of racism and antisemitism" should go directly to the articles written by Monica Sjöö and Yonassan Gershom, which it does not now. But I hesitate to change it because I think that might make problems with the reference system in place. Is there a way to do that without making a general mess of things? [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 19:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
524393 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524392 +++$+++ 524392 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.190081700E09 +++$+++ The links are there, they're just small, at the beginning of the refs. The change seems to have been made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Alice_Bailey&diff=next&oldid=156134293 September 6, by Catherine]. I think it was done by mistake; Cat was trying to standardize ref style, and tripped. Let's see if I can fix it. -- +++$+++ : The links are there, they're just small, at the beginning of the refs. The change seems to have been made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alice_Bailey&diff=next&oldid=156134293 September 6, by Catherine]. I think it was done by mistake; Cat was trying to standardize ref style, and tripped. Let's see if I can fix it. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 19:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
524394 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524392 +++$+++ 524393 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.190082000E09 +++$+++ I think [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Alice_Bailey&diff=158557117&oldid=158538262 that] was what Catherine wanted to do - if it wasn't, please correct further. However, I'm not sure why '''Charges of ...''' is its own section. It seems that '''Criticisms''', '''Controversies''' and '''Charges''' are rather related sorts of sections, and should be subsections of a common section. No? -- +++$+++ :: I think [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alice_Bailey&diff=158557117&oldid=158538262 that] was what Catherine wanted to do - if it wasn't, please correct further. However, I'm not sure why '''Charges of ...''' is its own section. It seems that '''Criticisms''', '''Controversies''' and '''Charges''' are rather related sorts of sections, and should be subsections of a common section. No? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 19:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
524395 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524392 +++$+++ 524394 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.190084580E09 +++$+++ Do you have any ideas of how it might be possible to get more eyes on this article? I think that the views of more editors who are neither pro nor con Alice Bailey, but who just want to see a good Wikipedia article, would inject some sanity into a situation that is now pretty crazy. The situation, as it is now, is just two sides, completely polarized, that do not trust each other. It is not what could be called a healthy situation. Dysfunctional editing....I do not take any pride in being part of that. I think it would be a big help if there were more editors taking part who, like Itsmejudith, are really neutral and outside the argument.  +++$+++ :::Do you have any ideas of how it might be possible to get more eyes on this article? I think that the views of more editors who are neither pro nor con Alice Bailey, but who just want to see a good Wikipedia article, would inject some sanity into a situation that is now pretty crazy. The situation, as it is now, is just two sides, completely polarized, that do not trust each other. It is not what could be called a healthy situation. Dysfunctional editing....I do not take any pride in being part of that. I think it would be a big help if there were more editors taking part who, like Itsmejudith, are really neutral and outside the argument. [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 20:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
524396 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524392 +++$+++ 524395 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.190085540E09 +++$+++ I'm also not sure what your goal is in adding extra opinions. We've gotten off the main problem, where, for a long time, people were just fighting over one small section unproductively. Now the article is growing, that's all that can be asked for, that's the goal. If I saw it before me at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography\/Assessment]], I'd upgrade it from Start-class to B-class without difficulty. It will never be perfect, there will always be tweaks that can be made, but we're (or, rather, since I'm not doing much, you're) getting it better and better. -- +++$+++ :::: I'm also not sure what your goal is in adding extra opinions. We've gotten off the main problem, where, for a long time, people were just fighting over one small section unproductively. Now the article is growing, that's all that can be asked for, that's the goal. If I saw it before me at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment]], I'd upgrade it from Start-class to B-class without difficulty. It will never be perfect, there will always be tweaks that can be made, but we're (or, rather, since I'm not doing much, you're) getting it better and better. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 20:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
524397 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524392 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.190139060E09 +++$+++ It is my experience that on Saturday and Sunday, when there are no administrators watching, things start to spin out of control. Just take a look at what was going on over the weekend, and how much more quiet it got on Monday. That is why I think extra eyes would help, not hurt.  +++$+++ ::::::It is my experience that on Saturday and Sunday, when there are no administrators watching, things start to spin out of control. Just take a look at what was going on over the weekend, and how much more quiet it got on Monday. That is why I think extra eyes would help, not hurt. [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 11:11, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

524914 +++$+++ KeithTyler +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-12 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.134448140E09 +++$+++ Edwardian has run away from the matter. If you have any advice on this dispute, it could be used. The whole point of me getting involved in this dispute and bringing it to [[WP:RFC]] was specifically so that I could help the matter through the proper process, not get stuck in the middle of something I don't have any familiarity with. TIA,  +++$+++ Edwardian has run away from the matter. If you have any advice on this dispute, it could be used. The whole point of me getting involved in this dispute and bringing it to [[WP:RFC]] was specifically so that I could help the matter through the proper process, not get stuck in the middle of something I don't have any familiarity with. TIA, [[User:KeithTyler|Keith D. Tyler]] [[User_talk:KeithTyler|¶]] 20:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
524915 +++$+++ Edwardian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524914 +++$+++ 524914 +++$+++ 2005-12-13 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.134475860E09 +++$+++ \"Run away\" is decidely POV, but I agree with the gist of his suggestion.  +++$+++ :"Run away" is decidely POV, but I agree with the gist of his suggestion. [[User:Edwardian|Edwardian]] 04:11, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

524919 +++$+++ Edwardian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524919 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-18 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.134959400E09 +++$+++ Hi, Arcadian. I suspect that [[Complications of cataract surgery]] is a recreation of material previously deleted due to copyright violations (i.e. [[Atonic pupil after cataract surgery]], [[Atonic pupil after cataract surgery\/Temp]]), but I have no way to verify this. Are you able to view the previously deleted articles and let me know how similar they are? I believe the new one may warrant a speedy delete if my suspicions are true. (FYI, the second listing from the top in the following link cites the violation: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ACopyright_problems&diff=20733183&oldid=20653532#August_10].) Thanks again for your help! -  +++$+++ Hi, Arcadian. I suspect that [[Complications of cataract surgery]] is a recreation of material previously deleted due to copyright violations (i.e. [[Atonic pupil after cataract surgery]], [[Atonic pupil after cataract surgery/Temp]]), but I have no way to verify this. Are you able to view the previously deleted articles and let me know how similar they are? I believe the new one may warrant a speedy delete if my suspicions are true. (FYI, the second listing from the top in the following link cites the violation: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ACopyright_problems&diff=20733183&oldid=20653532#August_10].) Thanks again for your help! - [[User:Edwardian|Edwardian]] 18:30, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
524920 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524919 +++$+++ 524919 +++$+++ 2005-12-18 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.134962340E09 +++$+++ I have looked at the history for [[Atonic pupil after cataract surgery]], and [[Complications of cataract surgery]] has exactly the same content as was speedied as copyvio previously, so I did a speedy delete, since it seems to meet [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion]]. (However, this is the first time I've done a speedy delete, so if anybody feels I'm acting improperly, just let me know.) -- +++$+++ :I have looked at the history for [[Atonic pupil after cataract surgery]], and [[Complications of cataract surgery]] has exactly the same content as was speedied as copyvio previously, so I did a speedy delete, since it seems to meet [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion]]. (However, this is the first time I've done a speedy delete, so if anybody feels I'm acting improperly, just let me know.) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 19:19, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
524921 +++$+++ Edwardian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524919 +++$+++ 524920 +++$+++ 2005-12-18 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.134963720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for looking into it! BTW, I forgot to mention [[Complications of Cataract Surgery]]. -  +++$+++ ::Thanks for looking into it! BTW, I forgot to mention [[Complications of Cataract Surgery]]. - [[User:Edwardian|Edwardian]] 19:42, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
524922 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524919 +++$+++ 524921 +++$+++ 2005-12-18 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.134963900E09 +++$+++ Got it -- that redirect page is now also deleted. -- +++$+++ :::Got it -- that redirect page is now also deleted. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 19:45, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

632 +++$+++ Hodja Nasreddin +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-13 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.308013920E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Amendment&curid=22747432&diff=434058814&oldid=434058340] -> Would you mind removing or modifying your comments at Amendment page, please? It was not me. Thanks,  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment&curid=22747432&diff=434058814&oldid=434058340] -> Would you mind removing or modifying your comments at Amendment page, please? It was not me. Thanks, [[User:Hodja Nasreddin|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Hodja Nasreddin|talk]]) 18:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
633 +++$+++ Hodja Nasreddin +++$+++ Nanobear +++$+++ 632 +++$+++ 632 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.308019320E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Amendment&diff=prev&oldid=434101301] -> Thank you.  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment&diff=prev&oldid=434101301] -> Thank you. [[User:Hodja Nasreddin|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Hodja Nasreddin|talk]]) 19:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

524923 +++$+++ Hob +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-20 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.135080480E09 +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for adding some references to [[Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy]]! I expanded them from just PubMed numbers to full citations. However, right now they're not being used specifically for anything in the article itself, and I'd like to know what they actually say. Do you have access to the articles, or just the abstracts? If we're not citing any particular facts, I'm a little nervous about including something like \"Sustained recovery of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after treatment with IL-2\" because that's just a single study - it would be misleading to give people the impression that IL-2 is a proven treatment. I have a long list of journal articles which I'm hoping to dig through soon, to make this a solider article. \u2190 +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for adding some references to [[Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy]]! I expanded them from just PubMed numbers to full citations. However, right now they're not being used specifically for anything in the article itself, and I'd like to know what they actually say. Do you have access to the articles, or just the abstracts? If we're not citing any particular facts, I'm a little nervous about including something like "Sustained recovery of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after treatment with IL-2" because that's just a single study - it would be misleading to give people the impression that IL-2 is a proven treatment. I have a long list of journal articles which I'm hoping to dig through soon, to make this a solider article. ←[[User:Hob|Hob]] 04:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
524924 +++$+++ Hob +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524923 +++$+++ 524923 +++$+++ 2005-12-20 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.135082340E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks - I need to read up anyway. The eMedicine article looks really good, so probably we just want to cherry-pick its references and add a few more recent ones. As for HAART making PML worse, it's more specifically IRIS (immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome), an occasional complication of effective HAART, that's the problem; as far as I can tell, there's nothing about this on WP yet except in a [[IRIS|disambiguation page]], so I guess I'll put that on my list too. \u2190 +++$+++ :OK, thanks - I need to read up anyway. The eMedicine article looks really good, so probably we just want to cherry-pick its references and add a few more recent ones. As for HAART making PML worse, it's more specifically IRIS (immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome), an occasional complication of effective HAART, that's the problem; as far as I can tell, there's nothing about this on WP yet except in a [[IRIS|disambiguation page]], so I guess I'll put that on my list too. ←[[User:Hob|Hob]] 04:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

637 +++$+++ Modernist +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 637 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.309751820E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For everything you do on the visual arts (including correcting my mistakes), and related.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For everything you do on the visual arts (including correcting my mistakes), and related. [[User:Modernist|Modernist]] ([[User talk:Modernist|talk]]) 20:57, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
638 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 637 +++$+++ 637 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.309752660E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much! But you make very, very few mistakes, and virtually everything on my watchlist seems to be on yours too, so I tend to see most everything you do. (Oh, but ironically, I guess I've just gone and sort of corrected you just now....) This barnstar means a lot coming from you \u2013 as I've noted several times before, you're the heart and soul of Wikipedia's visual arts project.  +++$+++ :Thank you very much! But you make very, very few mistakes, and virtually everything on my watchlist seems to be on yours too, so I tend to see most everything you do. (Oh, but ironically, I guess I've just gone and sort of corrected you just now....) This barnstar means a lot coming from you – as I've noted several times before, you're the heart and soul of Wikipedia's visual arts project. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 21:11, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

639 +++$+++ Ginger Warrior +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.309844460E09 +++$+++ Hi there. Thanks for clarifying the rules on my nomination. I'm currently readying the article for WP:GAN and with only one section left to do (the lead) I can't see the article breaking the x5 threshold. Feel free to remove the nom at will. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #74068f; font-family=fantasy\"> +++$+++ Hi there. Thanks for clarifying the rules on my nomination. I'm currently readying the article for WP:GAN and with only one section left to do (the lead) I can't see the article breaking the x5 threshold. Feel free to remove the nom at will. <small><span style="border:1px solid #74068f; font-family=fantasy">[[User:Ginger Warrior|<font style="color:#74068f; background:black">GW</font>]][[User talk:Ginger Warrior|<font style="color:white; background:#74068f">(talk)</font>]]</span></small> 22:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
640 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 639 +++$+++ 639 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.309849800E09 +++$+++ Sorry the DYK didn't work out for you on this one, but GA's so much more prestigious anyways; I hope that goes smoothly for you.  +++$+++ :Sorry the DYK didn't work out for you on this one, but GA's so much more prestigious anyways; I hope that goes smoothly for you. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 00:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

262784 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-02 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.194055980E09 +++$+++ I am still planning to take [[Polio|her]] to [[WP:FAC]] sometime soon (maybe in a week or so). Could you please take a look when you get a chance, I would really appreciate it. I think that there are a few weak spots, but overall that the article has come together (or actually has been divided off) quite nicley. That was all you; and it ended up really making all the difference in improving the article. Thank you for that.-- +++$+++ I am still planning to take [[Polio|her]] to [[WP:FAC]] sometime soon (maybe in a week or so). Could you please take a look when you get a chance, I would really appreciate it. I think that there are a few weak spots, but overall that the article has come together (or actually has been divided off) quite nicley. That was all you; and it ended up really making all the difference in improving the article. Thank you for that.--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 19:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
262785 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262784 +++$+++ 262784 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.194055980E09 +++$+++ One additional thought, what do you think about adding a [[WP:NAV|nav template]] to the [[Wikipedia:Article series|series]] of polio articles? I am thinking that it would be beneficial to the reader to have the series more easily identified and accessible.-- +++$+++ :One additional thought, what do you think about adding a [[WP:NAV|nav template]] to the [[Wikipedia:Article series|series]] of polio articles? I am thinking that it would be beneficial to the reader to have the series more easily identified and accessible.--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 19:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

641 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 641 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310206800E09 +++$+++ Mandarax--I was in the most amazing place today: [[Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum]]. Wish you could have been here. It totally blew my mind.  +++$+++ Mandarax--I was in the most amazing place today: [[Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum]]. Wish you could have been here. It totally blew my mind. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 03:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
642 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 641 +++$+++ 641 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.310261700E09 +++$+++ How exciting! Yes, I wish I could've been there too. Had you planned ahead and either gotten a fake ID or legally changed your name to \"Isabella\", in order to secure free admission?<p>I hope you'll also have time to see the [[Museum of Fine Arts, Boston]], whose collection includes ''Bal \xe0 Bougival'', a reproduction of which graced my dorm room walls. They also include work by my DYK artists [[Orovida Camille Pissarro]], [[Charles Angrand]], and [[Georg Muche]]. And while you're at it, swing by Harvard's [[Fogg Museum]] to catch a [[Frederick Hammersley]].<ref group=\"disclaimer\">While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, I make no guarantees that works by the above-named artists are still in the museum collections or are currently on public view.<\/ref> Have a great trip!   +++$+++ :How exciting! Yes, I wish I could've been there too. Had you planned ahead and either gotten a fake ID or legally changed your name to "Isabella", in order to secure free admission?<p>I hope you'll also have time to see the [[Museum of Fine Arts, Boston]], whose collection includes ''Bal à Bougival'', a reproduction of which graced my dorm room walls. They also include work by my DYK artists [[Orovida Camille Pissarro]], [[Charles Angrand]], and [[Georg Muche]]. And while you're at it, swing by Harvard's [[Fogg Museum]] to catch a [[Frederick Hammersley]].<ref group="disclaimer">While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, I make no guarantees that works by the above-named artists are still in the museum collections or are currently on public view.</ref> Have a great trip!  [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 18:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
643 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 641 +++$+++ 642 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.310434680E09 +++$+++ Sorry Mandarax, there was no time for that. For instance, I only got to see [[Trinity Church (Boston)|Trinity Church]] because I asked the cabby on the way back to the airport to make a slight detour. Next time. And no, I didn't weasel in one way or another; I paid my $12. I have a question for you, but it involves an image, so I'll do it in a separate section.  +++$+++ ::Sorry Mandarax, there was no time for that. For instance, I only got to see [[Trinity Church (Boston)|Trinity Church]] because I asked the cabby on the way back to the airport to make a slight detour. Next time. And no, I didn't weasel in one way or another; I paid my $12. I have a question for you, but it involves an image, so I'll do it in a separate section. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:38, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
644 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 641 +++$+++ 643 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.310441280E09 +++$+++ It's terrible not to have time for a museum. A friend arrived at the [[Art Institute of Chicago]] a few minutes before closing (but they still charged the full admission price) and he took a whirlwind tour of the place. He missed ''[[American Gothic]]''! A tragedy indeed; I believe I would rank this as the second most famous painting in the world. Fortunately, though, he ''did'' get to see ''[[A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte]]''.  +++$+++ :::It's terrible not to have time for a museum. A friend arrived at the [[Art Institute of Chicago]] a few minutes before closing (but they still charged the full admission price) and he took a whirlwind tour of the place. He missed ''[[American Gothic]]''! A tragedy indeed; I believe I would rank this as the second most famous painting in the world. Fortunately, though, he ''did'' get to see ''[[A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte]]''. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 20:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
645 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 641 +++$+++ 644 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.310441640E09 +++$+++ As much as I dislike YouTube links, I'm glad I saw [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ZIDV5s_wKrY this]. Esp. the buckshot is fantastic.  +++$+++ ::::As much as I dislike YouTube links, I'm glad I saw [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIDV5s_wKrY this]. Esp. the buckshot is fantastic. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

262786 +++$+++ The Transhumanist +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-04 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.194178320E09 +++$+++ The discussion you participated in continues at [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/List of basic geography topics]].   +++$+++ The discussion you participated in continues at [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of basic geography topics]].  [[User:The Transhumanist|The Transhumanist]] 04:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
262787 +++$+++ The Transhumanist +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262786 +++$+++ 262786 +++$+++ 2007-11-04 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.194238440E09 +++$+++ What is an acceptable definition for the term \"basic geography\"? Please see the new subsection at the FLC discussion.  I've presented a suggestion there.  Any suggestions for improving it would be most appreciated.  Thank you.   +++$+++ * What is an acceptable definition for the term "basic geography"? Please see the new subsection at the FLC discussion.  I've presented a suggestion there.  Any suggestions for improving it would be most appreciated.  Thank you.  [[User:The Transhumanist|The Transhumanist]] 20:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

262788 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-06 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.194342060E09 +++$+++ Hi Colin, I have a question about a subpage within a [[WP:FLC]] page and originally asked SandyGeorgia's advice on it. Sandy thought you might know the answer so I am asking you, please see [[User_talk:SandyGeorgia#FLC_subpage_questions|here]]. Thanks in advance for any advice,  +++$+++ Hi Colin, I have a question about a subpage within a [[WP:FLC]] page and originally asked SandyGeorgia's advice on it. Sandy thought you might know the answer so I am asking you, please see [[User_talk:SandyGeorgia#FLC_subpage_questions|here]]. Thanks in advance for any advice, [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 01:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
262789 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262788 +++$+++ 262788 +++$+++ 2007-11-06 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.194353280E09 +++$+++ Question answered now, thanks  +++$+++ *Question answered now, thanks [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 04:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

646 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 646 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.310434740E09 +++$+++ Can you make a template to warn editors about edit warring using this image? I imagine that in specific cases it may be the most appropriate one, at least allegorically speaking. With regards and friendship,  +++$+++ Can you make a template to warn editors about edit warring using this image? I imagine that in specific cases it may be the most appropriate one, at least allegorically speaking. With regards and friendship, [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
647 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 646 +++$+++ 646 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310434920E09 +++$+++ And [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Mandarax&diff=prev&oldid=438950128 congratulations!] I mentioned you in a session in Boston as a ''gnome extraordinaire''. Someone from the Foundation should send you a gold dung ball one of these days in honor of your work--or maybe [[The Scream|a nice reproduction]] of a work of art. Well done Mandarax.  +++$+++ *And [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mandarax&diff=prev&oldid=438950128 congratulations!] I mentioned you in a session in Boston as a ''gnome extraordinaire''. Someone from the Foundation should send you a gold dung ball one of these days in honor of your work--or maybe [[The Scream|a nice reproduction]] of a work of art. Well done Mandarax. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
648 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 646 +++$+++ 647 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310440380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for thinking of me. Wow, I'm famous! It would be nice to be thought of some day as that guy with a huge list of Featured Articles, but for now I'll settle for ''gnome extraordinaire''. It's interesting that you mentioned that painting, as I hadn't seen any Munchs for a long time, until just a few days ago I saw three at a special [[Santa Barbara Museum of Art|museum]] exhibition.   +++$+++ :*Thanks for thinking of me. Wow, I'm famous! It would be nice to be thought of some day as that guy with a huge list of Featured Articles, but for now I'll settle for ''gnome extraordinaire''. It's interesting that you mentioned that painting, as I hadn't seen any Munchs for a long time, until just a few days ago I saw three at a special [[Santa Barbara Museum of Art|museum]] exhibition.  [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 20:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
649 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 646 +++$+++ 648 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310441220E09 +++$+++ Excellent work, Mandarax! I knew I could rely on you. Now, off to the Pokemon articles so we can start applying your marvel of code.  +++$+++ ::*Excellent work, Mandarax! I knew I could rely on you. Now, off to the Pokemon articles so we can start applying your marvel of code. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
650 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 646 +++$+++ 649 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310442420E09 +++$+++ Alas, I see that [[Template:uw-ew]] is already taken. Oh, and in regards to the above-mentioned list of the world's most famous paintings.... I haven't actually constructed such a list yet, but I think ''[[The Scream]]'' may be number three.  +++$+++ :::*Alas, I see that [[Template:uw-ew]] is already taken. Oh, and in regards to the above-mentioned list of the world's most famous paintings.... I haven't actually constructed such a list yet, but I think ''[[The Scream]]'' may be number three. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 20:47, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

262792 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-06 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.194418200E09 +++$+++ Overwhelmed? I know the feeling :) As for [[poliomyelitis]], that's pretty much outside my limited expertise, but a good read and an opinion can't hurt. I'll see what I can do (I'm becoming traumatized by this sentence).  +++$+++ Overwhelmed? I know the feeling :) As for [[poliomyelitis]], that's pretty much outside my limited expertise, but a good read and an opinion can't hurt. I'll see what I can do (I'm becoming traumatized by this sentence). [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 22:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
262793 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262792 +++$+++ 262792 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.194820440E09 +++$+++ Yours were more so, trust me :)  +++$+++ :Yours were more so, trust me :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 14:34, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

262252 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262252 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-01 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.291257660E09 +++$+++ I would like to dispute a part of this close. Specifically, those that do not refer to persons, but rather simply to films and screenplays. I believe that these should be debated, ''separately'' from those dealing with persons. These would be the bottom five listed in the above discussion. Please do not delete those five. Thank you, -- ''' +++$+++ I would like to dispute a part of this close. Specifically, those that do not refer to persons, but rather simply to films and screenplays. I believe that these should be debated, ''separately'' from those dealing with persons. These would be the bottom five listed in the above discussion. Please do not delete those five. Thank you, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 18:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
262253 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262252 +++$+++ 262252 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.291259520E09 +++$+++ I believe you mean the bottom four? The fifth one up is the \"people who received the award\" category. There was no consensus in the CfD to only delete some of the categories, but not others. The policy-based arguments given for the \"listify and delete\" votes were meant (AFAIK) for ''all'' of the categories. I see no reason why I as a neutral closer should discount those votes for a few of the categories. Is there something special for those that I'm missing? If you wanted the nomination split, it would have been something to bring up during the 2.5 week deletion discussion.  +++$+++ :I believe you mean the bottom four? The fifth one up is the "people who received the award" category. There was no consensus in the CfD to only delete some of the categories, but not others. The policy-based arguments given for the "listify and delete" votes were meant (AFAIK) for ''all'' of the categories. I see no reason why I as a neutral closer should discount those votes for a few of the categories. Is there something special for those that I'm missing? If you wanted the nomination split, it would have been something to bring up during the 2.5 week deletion discussion. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 19:12, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
262254 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262252 +++$+++ 262253 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.291259760E09 +++$+++ Yes, I want a new nomination to deal with those five that do not involve people and the one that involves people where persons explicitly do not object to having received the award. The \"delete\" commenters only primarily focused their discussion on the \"person\" aspect. The other categories should not be swept under the rug with those \"person\" related categories. At the very least, they should have a ''separate'' discussion. -- ''' +++$+++ ::Yes, I want a new nomination to deal with those five that do not involve people and the one that involves people where persons explicitly do not object to having received the award. The "delete" commenters only primarily focused their discussion on the "person" aspect. The other categories should not be swept under the rug with those "person" related categories. At the very least, they should have a ''separate'' discussion. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 19:16, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
262255 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262252 +++$+++ 262252 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.291259940E09 +++$+++ Yes, these five should be discussed in a ''separate'' discussion, as they do not involve the same \"person\" issues cited by the delete comments from the CFD. -- ''' +++$+++ :Yes, these five should be discussed in a ''separate'' discussion, as they do not involve the same "person" issues cited by the delete comments from the CFD. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 19:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
262256 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262252 +++$+++ 262254 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.291260180E09 +++$+++ The discussion had nothing to do with whether or not people objected to the award - it had everything to do with whether the award was a defining point of an actor's career. And there were no votes that stated \"keep the movie ones, delete the people ones\". That's not really how award categories work. Again, '''if you wanted the discussion split you should have brought it up during the two and a half weeks the discussion was open''', which included one relisting. At the moment, this smacks of running to the other parent, as one batch deletion didn't go the way you wanted it to, so now you're trying to open another on the same categories. Also, while several of the arguments do specifically mention actors, several others don't - they speak of the awards in general terms which could mean either the people or the films. There's always [[WP:DRV]].  +++$+++ :::The discussion had nothing to do with whether or not people objected to the award - it had everything to do with whether the award was a defining point of an actor's career. And there were no votes that stated "keep the movie ones, delete the people ones". That's not really how award categories work. Again, '''if you wanted the discussion split you should have brought it up during the two and a half weeks the discussion was open''', which included one relisting. At the moment, this smacks of running to the other parent, as one batch deletion didn't go the way you wanted it to, so now you're trying to open another on the same categories. Also, while several of the arguments do specifically mention actors, several others don't - they speak of the awards in general terms which could mean either the people or the films. There's always [[WP:DRV]]. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 19:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
262257 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262252 +++$+++ 262256 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.291260360E09 +++$+++ This would be much easier if you could retain those I listed above, and start a new deletion discussion for them. The deletion discussion focused unduly on \"person\" categories. -- ''' +++$+++ ::::This would be much easier if you could retain those I listed above, and start a new deletion discussion for them. The deletion discussion focused unduly on "person" categories. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 19:26, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

262794 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.194483240E09 +++$+++ There were numerous supports for the original proposal.  I am not sure why you believe no one supported the process.  However, as you said the trial will die if everyone boycotts, is uninterested or does not participate for some other reason.  I view your reply as a statement that although you do not support the process you are not opposed to it having its fair shot.  Are you an admin?  I am trying to figure out whether I am truly going about this incorrectly.  I guess I should still give people some sort of notice that I will be conducting the experiment so that if there is some sort of policy violation, I will be corrected.  I think giving 7 days notice like this is appropriate.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ There were numerous supports for the original proposal.  I am not sure why you believe no one supported the process.  However, as you said the trial will die if everyone boycotts, is uninterested or does not participate for some other reason.  I view your reply as a statement that although you do not support the process you are not opposed to it having its fair shot.  Are you an admin?  I am trying to figure out whether I am truly going about this incorrectly.  I guess I should still give people some sort of notice that I will be conducting the experiment so that if there is some sort of policy violation, I will be corrected.  I think giving 7 days notice like this is appropriate.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 16:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
262795 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262794 +++$+++ 262794 +++$+++ 2007-11-07 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.194485760E09 +++$+++ If I go forward with the experiment would it be spamming to post a notice on the talk page of all people who nominated FLs promoted in 2007 of such an experiment?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :If I go forward with the experiment would it be spamming to post a notice on the talk page of all people who nominated FLs promoted in 2007 of such an experiment?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 17:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

651 +++$+++ LadyofShalott +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 651 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310554140E09 +++$+++ Any idea (without having to look hard - it's not worth it) what crazy bit of code someone's put on my talk page that is making it not wrap correctly? It's kind of annoying to have to scroll to the right. If it's not obvious right off, I'll just do a manual archive of everything I'm done looking at and hope that gets it. <font face=\"Lucida Calligraphy\"> +++$+++ Any idea (without having to look hard - it's not worth it) what crazy bit of code someone's put on my talk page that is making it not wrap correctly? It's kind of annoying to have to scroll to the right. If it's not obvious right off, I'll just do a manual archive of everything I'm done looking at and hope that gets it. <font face="Lucida Calligraphy">[[User:LadyofShalott|<font color="#ee3399">Lady</font>]]<font color="#0095c6">of</font>[[User_Talk:LadyofShalott|<font color="#442288">Shalott</font>]]</font> 03:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
652 +++$+++ Bgwhite +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 651 +++$+++ 651 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.310554740E09 +++$+++ <evil laugh>It was me.<\/evil laugh>  I got whacked in the head today because of you, so I left some evil code behind. The page looks fine to me on my browser (firefox).  Maybe a browser problem?   +++$+++ :<evil laugh>It was me.</evil laugh>  I got whacked in the head today because of you, so I left some evil code behind. The page looks fine to me on my browser (firefox).  Maybe a browser problem?  [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 03:59, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
653 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 651 +++$+++ 652 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.310555700E09 +++$+++ Lady, the page appears fine to me too (also Firefox). But I immediately spotted what looks like a potential source of trouble. Let me know if my \"fix\" fixed it. BTW, I hope you didn't change your signature just because I preferred the old color scheme. I may have very narrow aesthetic parameters.  +++$+++ ::Lady, the page appears fine to me too (also Firefox). But I immediately spotted what looks like a potential source of trouble. Let me know if my "fix" fixed it. BTW, I hope you didn't change your signature just because I preferred the old color scheme. I may have very narrow aesthetic parameters. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 04:15, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
654 +++$+++ LadyofShalott +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 651 +++$+++ 653 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.310556060E09 +++$+++ Mandarax, you're a genius! Yes, that fixed it, thank you! As for the signature, I wasn't sure I was entirely thrilled with the new color scheme... so when you said you didn't like it, that was enough to tip the balance. I'll play with it again sometime when I get bored with it again. <shrug> <font face=\"Lucida Calligraphy\"> +++$+++ :::Mandarax, you're a genius! Yes, that fixed it, thank you! As for the signature, I wasn't sure I was entirely thrilled with the new color scheme... so when you said you didn't like it, that was enough to tip the balance. I'll play with it again sometime when I get bored with it again. <shrug> <font face="Lucida Calligraphy">[[User:LadyofShalott|<font color="#ee3399">Lady</font>]]<font color="#0095c6">of</font>[[User_Talk:LadyofShalott|<font color="#442288">Shalott</font>]]</font> 04:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
655 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 651 +++$+++ 654 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 06:48:00 +++$+++ 1.310564880E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Glad I could help.  +++$+++ ::::You're welcome. Glad I could help. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 06:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
656 +++$+++ LadyofShalott +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 651 +++$+++ 653 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310556240E09 +++$+++ Bg, I had a smart reply for you, but edit conflicted with M, and his fix cleared you of your self-confessed crime. Lucky for you! <font face=\"Lucida Calligraphy\"> +++$+++ :::Bg, I had a smart reply for you, but edit conflicted with M, and his fix cleared you of your self-confessed crime. Lucky for you! <font face="Lucida Calligraphy">[[User:LadyofShalott|<font color="#ee3399">Lady</font>]]<font color="#0095c6">of</font>[[User_Talk:LadyofShalott|<font color="#442288">Shalott</font>]]</font> 04:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
657 +++$+++ Bgwhite +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 651 +++$+++ 656 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.310558340E09 +++$+++ Dang. I'll have to find another evil crime to commit.  I've gotten whacked in the head so many times today by my wife, I've lost count.  Payback Lady, Payback.   +++$+++ ::::Dang. I'll have to find another evil crime to commit.  I've gotten whacked in the head so many times today by my wife, I've lost count.  Payback Lady, Payback.  [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 04:59, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

262797 +++$+++ AndrewGNF +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-08 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.194582480E09 +++$+++ Hello, regarding your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Timeline_of_tuberous_sclerosis&curid=8888697&diff=170155021&oldid=169792974 recent edit], is there an official policy to only wikilink the first occurrence of a term?  I couldn't find any mention of it in [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style]].  Of course I see the rationale (and it sure would make my life easier), but I'm curious to know whether this is a judgment call in each case or a policy which I should keep in mind in general.  Cheers,  +++$+++ Hello, regarding your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timeline_of_tuberous_sclerosis&curid=8888697&diff=170155021&oldid=169792974 recent edit], is there an official policy to only wikilink the first occurrence of a term?  I couldn't find any mention of it in [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style]].  Of course I see the rationale (and it sure would make my life easier), but I'm curious to know whether this is a judgment call in each case or a policy which I should keep in mind in general.  Cheers, [[User:AndrewGNF|AndrewGNF]] 20:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
262798 +++$+++ AndrewGNF +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262797 +++$+++ 262797 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.194584220E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I need to read more carefully.  [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28links%29#Overlinking_and_underlinking:_what.27s_the_best_ratio.3F]]  Anyway, agreed that the previous version was [[WP:OVERLINK]]ED, but I may add a few of those wikilinks back.  As it is, I think it is a tad underlinked (readers who jump to the bottom may not realize TSC2 is wikilinked at the top).  +++$+++ : Sorry, I need to read more carefully.  [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28links%29#Overlinking_and_underlinking:_what.27s_the_best_ratio.3F]]  Anyway, agreed that the previous version was [[WP:OVERLINK]]ED, but I may add a few of those wikilinks back.  As it is, I think it is a tad underlinked (readers who jump to the bottom may not realize TSC2 is wikilinked at the top). [[User:AndrewGNF|AndrewGNF]] 20:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
262799 +++$+++ AndrewGNF +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262797 +++$+++ 262798 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.194593580E09 +++$+++ FYI, I replied [[User_talk:AndrewGNF#Overlinking|over here]].  Cheers,  +++$+++ :: FYI, I replied [[User_talk:AndrewGNF#Overlinking|over here]].  Cheers, [[User:AndrewGNF|AndrewGNF]] 23:33, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

524942 +++$+++ Semiconscious +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-10 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.136899020E09 +++$+++ Arcadian: We've run across each other before. I'm trying to revive [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Neuroscience]]. I know you do work on some neuro related articles. Would you care to join us over there?  +++$+++ Arcadian: We've run across each other before. I'm trying to revive [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Neuroscience]]. I know you do work on some neuro related articles. Would you care to join us over there? [[User:Semiconscious|<font color="#6D603B">Semiconscious</font>]] ([[User talk:Semiconscious|<font color="#6D603B"><small>talk</small></font>]] · [http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~btvoytek <font color="#6D603B"><small>home</small></font>]) 05:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
524943 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524942 +++$+++ 524942 +++$+++ 2006-01-10 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.136900400E09 +++$+++ Sure -- I've signed up and I'll see what I can do. Thanks for the invitation. -- +++$+++ :Sure -- I've signed up and I'll see what I can do. Thanks for the invitation. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 05:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

262801 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-12 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.194858300E09 +++$+++ As for the nav template, I was actually thinking of a \"vertical series box\" at the top of the article (like [[Culture of Ghana]]). But if you think that a nav box at the bottom would be better, that would be great too. Let me know, and I will try my hand at making one myself or knock on a few doors. -- +++$+++ As for the nav template, I was actually thinking of a "vertical series box" at the top of the article (like [[Culture of Ghana]]). But if you think that a nav box at the bottom would be better, that would be great too. Let me know, and I will try my hand at making one myself or knock on a few doors. --[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 01:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
262802 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262801 +++$+++ 262801 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.194919980E09 +++$+++ Okay, I have sort of made a mock version using the Culture of Ghana template [[User:DO11.10\/Sandbox|here]], but it (obviously) needs to be adjusted for use in the polio articles. I have ''no idea'' how to do this, and [[Help:Template]] reads like stereo instructions. Do you have any knowledge of how to do this?-- +++$+++ :Okay, I have sort of made a mock version using the Culture of Ghana template [[User:DO11.10/Sandbox|here]], but it (obviously) needs to be adjusted for use in the polio articles. I have ''no idea'' how to do this, and [[Help:Template]] reads like stereo instructions. Do you have any knowledge of how to do this?--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 18:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
262803 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262801 +++$+++ 262801 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.194920100E09 +++$+++ BTW did you notice this?: ''User:Colin\u200e; 09:24 . . '''(+666)''' . . Colin (Talk | contribs) (\u2192Barnstars - a giant bouncy ball of death)'', lol.-- +++$+++ :BTW did you notice this?: ''User:Colin‎; 09:24 . . '''(+666)''' . . Colin (Talk | contribs) (→Barnstars - a giant bouncy ball of death)'', lol.--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 18:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
262804 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262801 +++$+++ 262803 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.194949380E09 +++$+++ I've [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Poliomyelitis|nominated the article]] for FAC just now. Will keep working on the nav template (or more likely ask the resident Template guru, [[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]], for some help). Thanks again!-- +++$+++ ::I've [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Poliomyelitis|nominated the article]] for FAC just now. Will keep working on the nav template (or more likely ask the resident Template guru, [[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]], for some help). Thanks again!--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 02:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

658 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 658 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-16 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.310865900E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your tireless copy-editing in DYK!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your tireless copy-editing in DYK! [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 18:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
659 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 658 +++$+++ 658 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310868480E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much! Also, thanks for your work with scientific articles which help boost the intelligence level of DYK.  +++$+++ :Thank you very much! Also, thanks for your work with scientific articles which help boost the intelligence level of DYK. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 19:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

660 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311062340E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | For their fantabulous gnoming, now over 178,000 times.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For their fantabulous gnoming, now over 178,000 times. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 00:59, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
661 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 660 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311080280E09 +++$+++ Awwww, thanks.<p>Okay, now, without taking time to think or look anything up, what's the first thing that comes to mind upon hearing the word ''fantabulous''?  +++$+++ :*Awwww, thanks.<p>Okay, now, without taking time to think or look anything up, what's the first thing that comes to mind upon hearing the word ''fantabulous''? [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 05:58, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
662 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 660 +++$+++ 660 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311070380E09 +++$+++ Are you familiar with [[Stendhal syndrome]]? I came across it by accident, and ''[[The Red and the Black]]'' is my nighttime reading.  +++$+++ *Are you familiar with [[Stendhal syndrome]]? I came across it by accident, and ''[[The Red and the Black]]'' is my nighttime reading. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 03:13, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
663 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 660 +++$+++ 662 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311080280E09 +++$+++ No, I'd never heard of it before, nor do I suffer from it. And I've been to the Uffizi! (Of course, if I were susceptible to this malaise, it would've struck ''me'' at the Mus\xe9e d'Orsay.)  +++$+++ :*No, I'd never heard of it before, nor do I suffer from it. And I've been to the Uffizi! (Of course, if I were susceptible to this malaise, it would've struck ''me'' at the Musée d'Orsay.) [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 05:58, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
664 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 660 +++$+++ 663 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311164460E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately I didn't get to see it, though I spent an afternoon at the Palazzo Pitti. My dad and I took a motorcycle trip to Italy, and I ditched him for half a day to go art browsing. Today is\/would have been his birthday! But you and your \"modern\" art, pshaw. As for your 'fantabulous' question--is this a Jetson's reference? The only other thing that comes to my mind is \"fantabulistic.\" Enlighten me!  +++$+++ ::*Unfortunately I didn't get to see it, though I spent an afternoon at the Palazzo Pitti. My dad and I took a motorcycle trip to Italy, and I ditched him for half a day to go art browsing. Today is/would have been his birthday! But you and your "modern" art, pshaw. As for your 'fantabulous' question--is this a Jetson's reference? The only other thing that comes to my mind is "fantabulistic." Enlighten me! [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 05:21, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
665 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 660 +++$+++ 664 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311171180E09 +++$+++ First my friend goes to the Art Institute of Chicago and doesn't see ''American Gothic'', and then you visit Florence without going to the Uffizi. I'm not sure if their ''Birth of Venus'' by Botticelli is in that mythical Ten Most Famous Paintings in the World list that I seem to be compiling, but it's probably at least in the top twenty. While you missed one version of Artemisia Gentileschi's ''Judith Slaying Holofernes'' at the Uffizi, at least you (probably) got to see another of her versions of the same subject at Palazzo Pitti. But, most importantly, did you go see ''David''? (Ack! Now I'm thinking about the most famous ''sculptures'' in the world.)<p>When a word gets inextricably associated with one specific thing in my mind, I wonder if that's the case for others too. So thanks for indulging me. For me, I hear \"fantabulous\" and I instantly think of Van Morrison's [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=uNsmF9JTpuI song] \"[[Moondance (Van Morrison song)|Moondance]]\", from the album of the same name, which is one of my favorite albums of all time. Yes, I have a mellower side \u2013 it's not all Jimi and Grateful Dead and Pink Floyd. I don't get the Jetson's reference. BTW, there was a [http:\/\/wizzard.com\/skypad\/ Jetson's installation] at last year's Burning Man.  +++$+++ :::*First my friend goes to the Art Institute of Chicago and doesn't see ''American Gothic'', and then you visit Florence without going to the Uffizi. I'm not sure if their ''Birth of Venus'' by Botticelli is in that mythical Ten Most Famous Paintings in the World list that I seem to be compiling, but it's probably at least in the top twenty. While you missed one version of Artemisia Gentileschi's ''Judith Slaying Holofernes'' at the Uffizi, at least you (probably) got to see another of her versions of the same subject at Palazzo Pitti. But, most importantly, did you go see ''David''? (Ack! Now I'm thinking about the most famous ''sculptures'' in the world.)<p>When a word gets inextricably associated with one specific thing in my mind, I wonder if that's the case for others too. So thanks for indulging me. For me, I hear "fantabulous" and I instantly think of Van Morrison's [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNsmF9JTpuI song] "[[Moondance (Van Morrison song)|Moondance]]", from the album of the same name, which is one of my favorite albums of all time. Yes, I have a mellower side – it's not all Jimi and Grateful Dead and Pink Floyd. I don't get the Jetson's reference. BTW, there was a [http://wizzard.com/skypad/ Jetson's installation] at last year's Burning Man. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 07:13, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
666 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 660 +++$+++ 665 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311199500E09 +++$+++ There was no Jetson's ''reference'', Mandarax--that was just a guess. You know I'm not from this land, so half the time I just make it up.  +++$+++ ::::*There was no Jetson's ''reference'', Mandarax--that was just a guess. You know I'm not from this land, so half the time I just make it up. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 15:05, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

524398 +++$+++ Catherineyronwode +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-16 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.190009460E09 +++$+++ I am asking your assistance in helping the folks at the [[New Thought]] and [[New Thought Movement]] articles with some administrative technical magic. There is a mis-named category (New Thought movement) that needs to be fixed to New Thought (to be consistent with another cat, New Age), and there are folks wanting to vote on a merge proposal who do not know how to work the wiki-system to do this. I am only a writer\/editor who found the article and its talk page today on one of my compulsive clean-up tours, and i have no technical knowledge at all. No squabbles are ongoing, and the ony discordant notes are the cries of a few lost sheep seeking a tech-shepherd. I will stick around the article(s) long enough to vote and thank you if you help them out. cat yronwode  +++$+++ I am asking your assistance in helping the folks at the [[New Thought]] and [[New Thought Movement]] articles with some administrative technical magic. There is a mis-named category (New Thought movement) that needs to be fixed to New Thought (to be consistent with another cat, New Age), and there are folks wanting to vote on a merge proposal who do not know how to work the wiki-system to do this. I am only a writer/editor who found the article and its talk page today on one of my compulsive clean-up tours, and i have no technical knowledge at all. No squabbles are ongoing, and the ony discordant notes are the cries of a few lost sheep seeking a tech-shepherd. I will stick around the article(s) long enough to vote and thank you if you help them out. cat yronwode [[User:Catherineyronwode|Catherineyronwode]] 23:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
524399 +++$+++ Catherineyronwode +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524398 +++$+++ 524398 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.190018340E09 +++$+++ Again, thanks for any help you can provide. cat +++$+++ :Again, thanks for any help you can provide. cat[[User:Catherineyronwode|Catherineyronwode]] 01:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
524400 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524398 +++$+++ 524399 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.190082720E09 +++$+++ It looks like there won't be any double redirects, so you won't have to change any other pages. Good luck. -- +++$+++ :: It looks like there won't be any double redirects, so you won't have to change any other pages. Good luck. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 19:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
524401 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524398 +++$+++ 524400 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.190083260E09 +++$+++ Oh, and for the rename, that probably needs to be listed at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion]] for the classic 5 days. That page describes what you need to do. It probably won't be controversial, but it is a category with a fair number of entries, let's cross the ts and dot the is. -- +++$+++ ::: Oh, and for the rename, that probably needs to be listed at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion]] for the classic 5 days. That page describes what you need to do. It probably won't be controversial, but it is a category with a fair number of entries, let's cross the ts and dot the is. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 19:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
524402 +++$+++ Catherineyronwode +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524398 +++$+++ 524399 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.190195460E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I have made the merge, but will leave the cat-rename for later. The article still has no sources, but that is not on my agenda and i will leave that task for others. All i did was pull the two pieces together into one coherent narrative, and left it for the New Thought folks to carry on from that point. cat  +++$+++ ::Thanks! I have made the merge, but will leave the cat-rename for later. The article still has no sources, but that is not on my agenda and i will leave that task for others. All i did was pull the two pieces together into one coherent narrative, and left it for the New Thought folks to carry on from that point. cat [[User:Catherineyronwode|Catherineyronwode]] 02:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
524403 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524398 +++$+++ 524398 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.190096700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 23:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
524404 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524398 +++$+++ 524403 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.190148360E09 +++$+++ AnonEMouse, the article as it is not goes NOT represent the work of its editors, but everything in it (except the criticism of Bailey's antisemitism) was written under the user name of Jamesd1, who I consider to be a single purpose meatpuppet. For comparison, this (which I believe was actually written by Jamesd1) [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Alice_Bailey&diff=136868474&oldid=136719995] was the last edit he did in June, at which time he stopped editing until August. When I compare that, with the article as it is today, it is obvious to me that the the person who wrote the current version has a different writing style and ability, and a vastly superior knowledge of the Alice Bailey books. It is hard to say that an IP check would show what was done, because the drafts could have been passed along for Jamesd1 to submit. But the near certainty that this whole long article was written by a single purpose meatpuppet is disturbing.  +++$+++ ::AnonEMouse, the article as it is not goes NOT represent the work of its editors, but everything in it (except the criticism of Bailey's antisemitism) was written under the user name of Jamesd1, who I consider to be a single purpose meatpuppet. For comparison, this (which I believe was actually written by Jamesd1) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alice_Bailey&diff=136868474&oldid=136719995] was the last edit he did in June, at which time he stopped editing until August. When I compare that, with the article as it is today, it is obvious to me that the the person who wrote the current version has a different writing style and ability, and a vastly superior knowledge of the Alice Bailey books. It is hard to say that an IP check would show what was done, because the drafts could have been passed along for Jamesd1 to submit. But the near certainty that this whole long article was written by a single purpose meatpuppet is disturbing. [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 13:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
524405 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524398 +++$+++ 524404 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.190153220E09 +++$+++ Remember our goal is to get a great encyclopedia, and that's one made up of great articles. A great article in this case isn't one that either builds Bailey up or tears her down, a great article is one that covers all aspects of a no doubt complex story (all humans are complex) and is pleasant and interesting to read. -- +++$+++ ::: Remember our goal is to get a great encyclopedia, and that's one made up of great articles. A great article in this case isn't one that either builds Bailey up or tears her down, a great article is one that covers all aspects of a no doubt complex story (all humans are complex) and is pleasant and interesting to read. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
524406 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524398 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.190240520E09 +++$+++ It seems like a great article? To me it looks like a promotional piece such as one might expect to find on the Lucis Trust site [http:\/\/www.lucistrust.org\/en\/arcane_school\/talks_and_articles\/the_conscience_of_love]. Not to say the Lucis Trust is bad, but they are promoting the Alice Bailey teaching. On Wikipedia things are supposed to be a little different, unless I am mistaken. Recently I have not been doing much to edit the article becaused Jamesd1 is still making so many changes and additions, and there is no point in shoveling while the snow is falling. (As for the charges of meatpuppet, I am quite sure that is true; and I think a checkuser would stand a good chance of proving it. But even it it did not, textural analysis of the changes in the article still seem to show it is true.)  +++$+++ :::::It seems like a great article? To me it looks like a promotional piece such as one might expect to find on the Lucis Trust site [http://www.lucistrust.org/en/arcane_school/talks_and_articles/the_conscience_of_love]. Not to say the Lucis Trust is bad, but they are promoting the Alice Bailey teaching. On Wikipedia things are supposed to be a little different, unless I am mistaken. Recently I have not been doing much to edit the article becaused Jamesd1 is still making so many changes and additions, and there is no point in shoveling while the snow is falling. (As for the charges of meatpuppet, I am quite sure that is true; and I think a checkuser would stand a good chance of proving it. But even it it did not, textural analysis of the changes in the article still seem to show it is true.) [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 15:22, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

262806 +++$+++ Rmky87 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262806 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-15 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.195179000E09 +++$+++ It was my understanding that primidone has been in use in the United Kingdom since 1950! I read that [http:\/\/www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov\/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=13383203 here], [http:\/\/www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov\/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=13446511 here], and [http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/k38587p17347828k\/fulltext.pdf here]. Apparently, British pharmaceutical regulatory agencies were run by naive morons in the 1950s, which are known for being a much more innocent time.-- +++$+++ It was my understanding that primidone has been in use in the United Kingdom since 1950! I read that [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=13383203 here], [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=13446511 here], and [http://www.springerlink.com/content/k38587p17347828k/fulltext.pdf here]. Apparently, British pharmaceutical regulatory agencies were run by naive morons in the 1950s, which are known for being a much more innocent time.--[[User:Rmky87|Rmky87]] 18:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
262807 +++$+++ 66.142.45.164 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262806 +++$+++ 262806 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.195210500E09 +++$+++ I get the distinct impression that Handley et al 1952 was another shitty open-label trial like the others listed in Williams 1956. One of those overdose articles states that it was ''introduced'' in 1950. Sometimes clinical trials are only published after the regulatory agencies have issued their approval. The pre-approval trials for Excegran weren't published until 1993[http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/sites\/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=8453952&ordinalpos=54&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum]; Excegran came on the Japanese market in 1989. I would love to know what Epilepsy Action's source was. I think I put more stock in something that was written by doctors back then, even if it is just a case report. [http:\/\/www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov\/pagerender.fcgi?artid=2029655&pageindex=1 This article] says that it was introduced \"two years earlier\" but it may have been submitted before 1953. Anyway, to me, \"introduced\" means \"put out on the market\".-- +++$+++ :I get the distinct impression that Handley et al 1952 was another shitty open-label trial like the others listed in Williams 1956. One of those overdose articles states that it was ''introduced'' in 1950. Sometimes clinical trials are only published after the regulatory agencies have issued their approval. The pre-approval trials for Excegran weren't published until 1993[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=8453952&ordinalpos=54&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum]; Excegran came on the Japanese market in 1989. I would love to know what Epilepsy Action's source was. I think I put more stock in something that was written by doctors back then, even if it is just a case report. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/pagerender.fcgi?artid=2029655&pageindex=1 This article] says that it was introduced "two years earlier" but it may have been submitted before 1953. Anyway, to me, "introduced" means "put out on the market".--[[User:66.142.45.164|66.142.45.164]] 02:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
262808 +++$+++ Rmky87 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262806 +++$+++ 262807 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.196239860E09 +++$+++ I think I will. Eventually. I'm not so sure if it was used in Germany then based on [http:\/\/pediatrics.aappublications.org\/cgi\/content\/abstract\/23\/1\/151 this] (i.e. the full text, which said, \"Primidone. (Mysoline#{174}) was. introduced. in. 1950\"). [http:\/\/pediatrics.aappublications.org\/cgi\/reprint\/22\/6\/1034.pdf This] says, \"introduced. for. clini-. cal. use. in 1952,. is Mysoline#{174} or primidone\". Both of those articles were written by Americans.-- +++$+++ ::I think I will. Eventually. I'm not so sure if it was used in Germany then based on [http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/23/1/151 this] (i.e. the full text, which said, "Primidone. (Mysoline#{174}) was. introduced. in. 1950"). [http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/22/6/1034.pdf This] says, "introduced. for. clini-. cal. use. in 1952,. is Mysoline#{174} or primidone". Both of those articles were written by Americans.--[[User:Rmky87|Rmky87]] ([[User talk:Rmky87|talk]]) 00:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
262809 +++$+++ Rmky87 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262806 +++$+++ 262808 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.196243040E09 +++$+++ As for the epilepsy article, I am very bad at translating things for the layman. That second article I just sent you could be useful if you want to write the history of Gemonil or Mebaral or something.-- +++$+++ :::As for the epilepsy article, I am very bad at translating things for the layman. That second article I just sent you could be useful if you want to write the history of Gemonil or Mebaral or something.--[[User:Rmky87|Rmky87]] ([[User talk:Rmky87|talk]]) 01:44, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
262810 +++$+++ Rmky87 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262806 +++$+++ 262809 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.196289840E09 +++$+++ You know, you're free to raid the primidone article for the old reviews and for that article that states that primidone is still a popular option in the developing world. I have that study saved to my computer if you want to know what everybody was taking. You might want to take a look at [http:\/\/www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov\/pagerender.fcgi?artid=1837449&pageindex=1 this]; the 1982 article about valproate and birth defects isn't on PubMed and it's the first article linking anticonvulsants to spina bifida. That was pretty historic if you ask me. You might want to look at [http:\/\/www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov\/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=2500206 this], too. They also say that valproate was only used for absence seizures in America. Since you're not just talking about primidone, you'll need someone to get those pre-1970 Diamox and teratogenicity articles for you. I really can't, by the way.-- +++$+++ ::::You know, you're free to raid the primidone article for the old reviews and for that article that states that primidone is still a popular option in the developing world. I have that study saved to my computer if you want to know what everybody was taking. You might want to take a look at [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/pagerender.fcgi?artid=1837449&pageindex=1 this]; the 1982 article about valproate and birth defects isn't on PubMed and it's the first article linking anticonvulsants to spina bifida. That was pretty historic if you ask me. You might want to look at [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=2500206 this], too. They also say that valproate was only used for absence seizures in America. Since you're not just talking about primidone, you'll need someone to get those pre-1970 Diamox and teratogenicity articles for you. I really can't, by the way.--[[User:Rmky87|Rmky87]] ([[User talk:Rmky87|talk]]) 14:44, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

524951 +++$+++ Semiconscious +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524951 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-20 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.137749340E09 +++$+++ YOU ROCK. I've been working toward a restructuring of the categories for the neuro-related articles. I was very pleased to see your prosencephalon template. If you make such changes, could you announce them to us over in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience]] just so we're aware? Awesome job my friend. Are you\/have you made others?  +++$+++ YOU ROCK. I've been working toward a restructuring of the categories for the neuro-related articles. I was very pleased to see your prosencephalon template. If you make such changes, could you announce them to us over in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience]] just so we're aware? Awesome job my friend. Are you/have you made others? [[User:Semiconscious|<font color="#6D603B">Semiconscious</font>]] · [[User talk:Semiconscious|<font color="#6D603B"><small>talk</small></font>]] 01:29, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
524952 +++$+++ Semiconscious +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524951 +++$+++ 524951 +++$+++ 2006-01-20 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.137749580E09 +++$+++ !!!! And you made an infobox. This is great! You have no idea how pleased I am right now. :)  +++$+++ *!!!! And you made an infobox. This is great! You have no idea how pleased I am right now. :) [[User:Semiconscious|<font color="#6D603B">Semiconscious</font>]] · [[User talk:Semiconscious|<font color="#6D603B"><small>talk</small></font>]] 01:33, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
524953 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524951 +++$+++ 524951 +++$+++ 2006-01-20 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.137750660E09 +++$+++ Thank you. It's just a start, but hopefully we've got something to build on now. I've left a message at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Neuroscience#Navigation_template]]. -- +++$+++ :Thank you. It's just a start, but hopefully we've got something to build on now. I've left a message at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Neuroscience#Navigation_template]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:51, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

524954 +++$+++ Kd4ttc +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524954 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-21 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.137897960E09 +++$+++ There is some thought about reworking the inflammation page.  I don't think all the organs of the body with -itis appended is really that useful in the article.   How about an article which is a list of all names for various types of inflammation, and a general entry in the inflammation page about how the terminology of medicine uses -itis as a suffix?  I mad a comment about this a while ago on the inflammation talk page.  +++$+++ There is some thought about reworking the inflammation page.  I don't think all the organs of the body with -itis appended is really that useful in the article.   How about an article which is a list of all names for various types of inflammation, and a general entry in the inflammation page about how the terminology of medicine uses -itis as a suffix?  I mad a comment about this a while ago on the inflammation talk page. [[User:Kd4ttc|Kd4ttc]] 18:46, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
524955 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524954 +++$+++ 524954 +++$+++ 2006-01-21 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.137898380E09 +++$+++ Done ([[List of types of inflammation]]) -- +++$+++ :Done ([[List of types of inflammation]]) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 18:53, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

667 +++$+++ 46.246.177.230 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 667 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.311208560E09 +++$+++ Hello, I am the same one who told you about Cathy Hochul and put images. Can you put Janice Hahn?--[[Special:Contributions\/46.246.177.230|46.246.177.230]] ( +++$+++ Hello, I am the same one who told you about Cathy Hochul and put images. Can you put Janice Hahn?--[[Special:Contributions/46.246.177.230|46.246.177.230]] ([[User talk:46.246.177.230|talk]]) 17:36, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
668 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 667 +++$+++ 667 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.311302820E09 +++$+++ Done. But I don't understand why you don't just [[WP:SODOIT|take care of these yourself]]. You added all of those pictures to the page, so you certainly know how to edit.  +++$+++ :Done. But I don't understand why you don't just [[WP:SODOIT|take care of these yourself]]. You added all of those pictures to the page, so you certainly know how to edit. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 19:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
669 +++$+++ 46.246.177.230 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 667 +++$+++ 668 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311357960E09 +++$+++ See, I know how to put a picture or how to correct a letter\/word. I don't know all theese codes which are needed for something like this. --[[Special:Contributions\/46.246.177.230|46.246.177.230]] ( +++$+++ ::See, I know how to put a picture or how to correct a letter/word. I don't know all theese codes which are needed for something like this. --[[Special:Contributions/46.246.177.230|46.246.177.230]] ([[User talk:46.246.177.230|talk]]) 11:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

262812 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262812 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-24 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.195949640E09 +++$+++ Merge proposals [[Talk:Sociological_and_cultural_aspects_of_autism#Merge_proposal|here]].   +++$+++ Merge proposals [[Talk:Sociological_and_cultural_aspects_of_autism#Merge_proposal|here]].  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
262813 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262812 +++$+++ 262812 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.196827500E09 +++$+++ [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia does not]] carry advertising. This is a drug with a very limited licence. The number of physicians and pharmacies needing to obtain this drug is extremely limited, and I suspect they have better sources of information than an international encyclopaedia.  +++$+++ :[[WP:NOT|Wikipedia does not]] carry advertising. This is a drug with a very limited licence. The number of physicians and pharmacies needing to obtain this drug is extremely limited, and I suspect they have better sources of information than an international encyclopaedia. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

670 +++$+++ Studerby +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311297840E09 +++$+++ Heya. Looks like you too did not get the word about changes to the default sorting in Wikimedia, it was slipped in quietly months ago and it's taken awhile for the sorting gnomes to notice. The biggest is that sorting is no longer case-sensitive; this means that OBrian and Obrian are equivalent and we no longer have to adjust names with non-standard capitalizations to get the correct results in sorting. [[WP:MCSTJR]] has therefore been updated, dropping the case-mangling rule. (Continuing to apply it doesn't hurt sorting, it's just extra work, and confusing to newbies.) I suspect AWB needs to be updated.  +++$+++ Heya. Looks like you too did not get the word about changes to the default sorting in Wikimedia, it was slipped in quietly months ago and it's taken awhile for the sorting gnomes to notice. The biggest is that sorting is no longer case-sensitive; this means that OBrian and Obrian are equivalent and we no longer have to adjust names with non-standard capitalizations to get the correct results in sorting. [[WP:MCSTJR]] has therefore been updated, dropping the case-mangling rule. (Continuing to apply it doesn't hurt sorting, it's just extra work, and confusing to newbies.) I suspect AWB needs to be updated. [[User:Studerby|Studerby]] ([[User talk:Studerby|talk]]) 18:24, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
671 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 670 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311300480E09 +++$+++ I was aware of it, and I haven't changed any sort keys according to the old rules since, unless some accidentally slipped by. What I ''have'' done is correct sort keys like \"O'Brian\" to \"Obrian\" because that's the way my version of AWB still does it and it's functionally equivalent to \"OBrian\". The next version of AWB has been updated to not add\/change sort keys per the old rule, and when it's released I'll check the sort key which is generated in a variable for use by people such as myself.  +++$+++ ::I was aware of it, and I haven't changed any sort keys according to the old rules since, unless some accidentally slipped by. What I ''have'' done is correct sort keys like "O'Brian" to "Obrian" because that's the way my version of AWB still does it and it's functionally equivalent to "OBrian". The next version of AWB has been updated to not add/change sort keys per the old rule, and when it's released I'll check the sort key which is generated in a variable for use by people such as myself. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 19:08, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
672 +++$+++ Studerby +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 670 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311304080E09 +++$+++ Oh. I went back and looked at the diffs that triggered my remark ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Paul_J._O%27Brien&action=historysubmit&diff=438124830&oldid=436926877 one such)] and realized that in each case, more than the unneeded case change was occurring; something helpful was also being done. In the example diff, the middle initial in the article title is being added to the sort key. So the problem is really that the comment is referring to the no-longer-existent case-problem (that was part of [[WP:MCSTJR]] rules) and not the sort key\/article title mis-match. In short, the comment misled me, and it's probably AWB that needs some adjustment. My bad, carry on.  +++$+++ :::Oh. I went back and looked at the diffs that triggered my remark ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_J._O%27Brien&action=historysubmit&diff=438124830&oldid=436926877 one such)] and realized that in each case, more than the unneeded case change was occurring; something helpful was also being done. In the example diff, the middle initial in the article title is being added to the sort key. So the problem is really that the comment is referring to the no-longer-existent case-problem (that was part of [[WP:MCSTJR]] rules) and not the sort key/article title mis-match. In short, the comment misled me, and it's probably AWB that needs some adjustment. My bad, carry on. [[User:Studerby|Studerby]] ([[User talk:Studerby|talk]]) 20:08, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
673 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 670 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311307560E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm responsible for the edit summary. I have AWB automatically use that one whenever certain conditions are met, such as the presence of an apostrophe. In cases such as the example listed, I use \"Edit sort key per [[WP:MCSTJR]]\" to mean \"Edit sort key, and the final result conforms to [[WP:MCSTJR]]\" (for people who may be confused that there's no apostrophe). But you're right; it does look like it's saying \"Edit sort key which doesn't conform to [[WP:MCSTJR]] so that it does\". I may or may not change that summary, as in the vast majority of cases, the latter meaning ''does'' apply.  +++$+++ ::::Well, I'm responsible for the edit summary. I have AWB automatically use that one whenever certain conditions are met, such as the presence of an apostrophe. In cases such as the example listed, I use "Edit sort key per [[WP:MCSTJR]]" to mean "Edit sort key, and the final result conforms to [[WP:MCSTJR]]" (for people who may be confused that there's no apostrophe). But you're right; it does look like it's saying "Edit sort key which doesn't conform to [[WP:MCSTJR]] so that it does". I may or may not change that summary, as in the vast majority of cases, the latter meaning ''does'' apply. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 21:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
674 +++$+++ Bgwhite +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 670 +++$+++ 670 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311298740E09 +++$+++ Could you tell me where the discussion took place?  This gnome doesn't get out much and I live in the rural area of the mushroom patch.  +++$+++ :Could you tell me where the discussion took place?  This gnome doesn't get out much and I live in the rural area of the mushroom patch. [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 18:39, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
675 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 670 +++$+++ 674 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311300480E09 +++$+++ I don't know of any discussion; the developers just finally got around to fixing it, without making any big announcement about it.  +++$+++ ::I don't know of any discussion; the developers just finally got around to fixing it, without making any big announcement about it. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 19:08, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
676 +++$+++ Studerby +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 670 +++$+++ 675 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.311304140E09 +++$+++ There's been a long-standing bug against the base software (bug #164) because sorting has basically been broken since day 1, most especially for non-European languages. They fixed the bug in a way that didn't have much effect ''except for sorting gnomes'' (and the biological taxonomy folk who had built on top of the bug howled about the bug being fixed)  +++$+++ :::There's been a long-standing bug against the base software (bug #164) because sorting has basically been broken since day 1, most especially for non-European languages. They fixed the bug in a way that didn't have much effect ''except for sorting gnomes'' (and the biological taxonomy folk who had built on top of the bug howled about the bug being fixed) [[User:Studerby|Studerby]] ([[User talk:Studerby|talk]]) 20:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
677 +++$+++ Bgwhite +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 670 +++$+++ 676 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311306360E09 +++$+++ Thank you Studerby for posting about it.  I had no clue the bug was fixed or that it was even a bug.  I too will follow what Mandrax stated above that he has been doing.  +++$+++ ::::Thank you Studerby for posting about it.  I had no clue the bug was fixed or that it was even a bug.  I too will follow what Mandrax stated above that he has been doing. [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 20:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

577863 +++$+++ Atropos +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ 577863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-29 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.183120260E09 +++$+++ Hey, you started this back in 2005 and don't seem to have done anything with it since; would it be fair of me to assume that you wouldn't mind me finishing and maintaining it now?  +++$+++ Hey, you started this back in 2005 and don't seem to have done anything with it since; would it be fair of me to assume that you wouldn't mind me finishing and maintaining it now? [[User:Atropos|Atropos]] 05:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
577864 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ 577863 +++$+++ 577863 +++$+++ 2007-06-30 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.183242600E09 +++$+++ Please do. Any page I create\/edit is yours to edit too. When I first started reading it, I thought you were going to suggest a delete of it, quite glad you're wanting to help out.  --   +++$+++ : Please do. Any page I create/edit is yours to edit too. When I first started reading it, I thought you were going to suggest a delete of it, quite glad you're wanting to help out.  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 15:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

262818 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262818 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-12 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.197510840E09 +++$+++ I saw [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Herpes_zoster&diff=177468276&oldid=177467498 this edit] at [[Herpes zoster]], which was a revert of my edit.  First of all, I hope you don't think I'm a complete idiot with regards to Lysine and VZV or HZ, because it was the only study I could find that was even peripherally related.  I really had no problem with the revert, because I'm just shocked that there wasn't a peer-reviewed article on lysine effects on this disease.  I've been hearing for years that lysine blocks replication of zoster virus.  To find out that there are no serious articles out there about it just convinces me how bad \"Alternative medicine\" is.  The snake oil types (sorry, but I find alternative medicine to be abhorrent to science) push this kind of crap, then you find out it's not true.  Sorry for the rant.  If you find anything that states Lysine actually works, please add it back into the article.   +++$+++ I saw [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Herpes_zoster&diff=177468276&oldid=177467498 this edit] at [[Herpes zoster]], which was a revert of my edit.  First of all, I hope you don't think I'm a complete idiot with regards to Lysine and VZV or HZ, because it was the only study I could find that was even peripherally related.  I really had no problem with the revert, because I'm just shocked that there wasn't a peer-reviewed article on lysine effects on this disease.  I've been hearing for years that lysine blocks replication of zoster virus.  To find out that there are no serious articles out there about it just convinces me how bad "Alternative medicine" is.  The snake oil types (sorry, but I find alternative medicine to be abhorrent to science) push this kind of crap, then you find out it's not true.  Sorry for the rant.  If you find anything that states Lysine actually works, please add it back into the article.  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 17:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
262819 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262818 +++$+++ 262818 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.197512040E09 +++$+++ So, I did a google search of Lysine + Treatment+ Zoster (hoping to get VZV and HZ hits).  Other than the hit from Wikipedia, nearly every single hit was some sort of lame herbalist, naturopathy, homeopathy or alternative medicine site.  I actually found one that said it probably has no effect.  The HSV reference was the best I could do (I guess I was HOPING for something that shows lysine works, just so I can provide a diff someday that I'm not totally opposed to alternative medicine).  OK, I submit myself for punishment.  As for the other issues, just list them on my page or on the HZ talk page, and we'll cross them off.   +++$+++ :So, I did a google search of Lysine + Treatment+ Zoster (hoping to get VZV and HZ hits).  Other than the hit from Wikipedia, nearly every single hit was some sort of lame herbalist, naturopathy, homeopathy or alternative medicine site.  I actually found one that said it probably has no effect.  The HSV reference was the best I could do (I guess I was HOPING for something that shows lysine works, just so I can provide a diff someday that I'm not totally opposed to alternative medicine).  OK, I submit myself for punishment.  As for the other issues, just list them on my page or on the HZ talk page, and we'll cross them off.  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 18:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

524964 +++$+++ Semiconscious +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524964 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-28 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.138513500E09 +++$+++ I couldn't let this go any longer: you are kicking ''ass'' with those images from Gray's. Fantastic, excellent, superb job my friend. :) [[User:Semiconscious|<font color=\"#6D603B\">S<\/font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\"><b>e<\/b><\/font>]] +++$+++ I couldn't let this go any longer: you are kicking ''ass'' with those images from Gray's. Fantastic, excellent, superb job my friend. :) [[User:Semiconscious|<font color="#6D603B">S</font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green"><b>e</b></font>]][[User:Semiconscious|<font color="#6D603B">miconscious</font>]] • [[User talk:Semiconscious|<font color="#6D603B"><small>talk</small></font>]] 21:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
524965 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524964 +++$+++ 524964 +++$+++ 2006-01-28 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.138519620E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much! FYI, if you're interested in anatomy, there's a discussion beginning at [[Template talk:Arteries]] you might want to check out. -- +++$+++ :Thank you so much! FYI, if you're interested in anatomy, there's a discussion beginning at [[Template talk:Arteries]] you might want to check out. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

678 +++$+++ Egg Centric +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311376080E09 +++$+++ I know you were using an automated tool at the time but this is quite [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=RAF_Stansted_Mountfitchet&action=historysubmit&diff=415004434&oldid=402170625 amusing]. {{=)}}<span style=\"background-color:silver;color:black;\"> +++$+++ I know you were using an automated tool at the time but this is quite [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=RAF_Stansted_Mountfitchet&action=historysubmit&diff=415004434&oldid=402170625 amusing]. {{=)}}<span style="background-color:silver;color:black;">[[User:Egg Centric|Egg]] [[User_talk:Egg Centric|Centric]]</span> 16:08, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
679 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 678 +++$+++ 678 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311385920E09 +++$+++ Wow, no one had edited that in the five months since I corrected that typo. Yeah, I'm afraid when using AWB to fix tons of typos, one sometimes just takes the time to see if it's blatant vandalism without fully checking for the proper context. At least it wasn't bad; just someone seeking their father's military buddies. Thanks for finally discovering this seven-month-old plea and removing it, and for telling me, so that I'll try to be more thorough in the future.  +++$+++ :Wow, no one had edited that in the five months since I corrected that typo. Yeah, I'm afraid when using AWB to fix tons of typos, one sometimes just takes the time to see if it's blatant vandalism without fully checking for the proper context. At least it wasn't bad; just someone seeking their father's military buddies. Thanks for finally discovering this seven-month-old plea and removing it, and for telling me, so that I'll try to be more thorough in the future. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 18:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

680 +++$+++ Number 57 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311406080E09 +++$+++ I assume my signature is misleading because I have got my time zone wrong in my preferences! Could you add the article back to the 23rd? Cheers,  +++$+++ I assume my signature is misleading because I have got my time zone wrong in my preferences! Could you add the article back to the 23rd? Cheers, [[User:Number 57|<font color="orange">Number</font>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<font color="green">5</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<font color="blue">7</font>]] 00:28, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
681 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 680 +++$+++ 680 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.311407820E09 +++$+++ DYK uses Wikipedia time ([[UTC]]), not your local time. In the UK, the times are the same, ''except'' when you're on [[British Summer Time|BST]], as you are now. So the correct date to use is 22 July. Besides, there's an advantage to having your nomination listed a day earlier \u2013 people preparing sets are encouraged to use those from earlier days first. If you'd like, you can move your nomination to the top of the listings for 22 July; I just left it at the bottom because it was easier to simply move the date heading from above your nomination to below.  +++$+++ :DYK uses Wikipedia time ([[UTC]]), not your local time. In the UK, the times are the same, ''except'' when you're on [[British Summer Time|BST]], as you are now. So the correct date to use is 22 July. Besides, there's an advantage to having your nomination listed a day earlier – people preparing sets are encouraged to use those from earlier days first. If you'd like, you can move your nomination to the top of the listings for 22 July; I just left it at the bottom because it was easier to simply move the date heading from above your nomination to below. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 00:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
682 +++$+++ Number 57 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 680 +++$+++ 681 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.311804900E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for explaining. I was worried that it would be missed by reviewers if placed in the earlier date (and unfortuntely it still hasn't been reviewd). Cheers,  +++$+++ ::OK, thanks for explaining. I was worried that it would be missed by reviewers if placed in the earlier date (and unfortuntely it still hasn't been reviewd). Cheers, [[User:Number 57|<font color="orange">Number</font>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<font color="green">5</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<font color="blue">7</font>]] 15:15, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

524969 +++$+++ Kcordina +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-31 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.138743900E09 +++$+++ Hi, I notice you've taken the info-box's out of the Gluteal muscles page.  Was that simply because they weren't formatting correctly?  Or some other reason?  There was a lot of good information in the boxes so it would be good to retain them, if the formatting can be fixed (which I'm sure it can be given a bit of time).  +++$+++ Hi, I notice you've taken the info-box's out of the Gluteal muscles page.  Was that simply because they weren't formatting correctly?  Or some other reason?  There was a lot of good information in the boxes so it would be good to retain them, if the formatting can be fixed (which I'm sure it can be given a bit of time). [[User:Kcordina|Kcordina]] 13:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
524970 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524969 +++$+++ 524969 +++$+++ 2006-01-31 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.138749960E09 +++$+++ I have responded at [[Talk:Gluteal muscles]]. -- +++$+++ :I have responded at [[Talk:Gluteal muscles]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 15:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

262826 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262826 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-18 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.198042380E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure if you've changed your opinion of the article's FAC status, but I think you have guided us in a ton of good ideas.  Have you changed your opinion?   +++$+++ I'm not sure if you've changed your opinion of the article's FAC status, but I think you have guided us in a ton of good ideas.  Have you changed your opinion?  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 21:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
262827 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262826 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-19 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.198056540E09 +++$+++ It'll be a little while anyway, but I'll keep an eye out. cheers,   +++$+++ ::It'll be a little while anyway, but I'll keep an eye out. cheers,  [[User:Casliber|Casliber]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 01:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

683 +++$+++ LadyofShalott +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311581580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the disambiguation. I kind of thought his name needed more, but was too lazy to check. <font face=\"Lucida Calligraphy\"> +++$+++ Thanks for the disambiguation. I kind of thought his name needed more, but was too lazy to check. <font face="Lucida Calligraphy">[[User:LadyofShalott|<font color="#ee3399">Lady</font>]]<font color="#0095c6">of</font>[[User_Talk:LadyofShalott|<font color="#442288">Shalott</font>]]</font> 01:13, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
684 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 683 +++$+++ 683 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311602460E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. We wouldn't want people to think they were painted by some [[John Waterhouse (headmaster)|headmaster]] or [[John Waterhouse (astronomer)|astronomer]]....  +++$+++ :You're welcome. We wouldn't want people to think they were painted by some [[John Waterhouse (headmaster)|headmaster]] or [[John Waterhouse (astronomer)|astronomer]].... [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 07:01, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

685 +++$+++ Postlunarpaintings +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311910200E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Thank you for your welcoming message, keep it up! Regards from Argentina  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for your welcoming message, keep it up! Regards from Argentina [[User:Postlunarpaintings|Postlunarpaintings]] ([[User talk:Postlunarpaintings|talk]]) 20:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
686 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 685 +++$+++ 685 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311911580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the pie, and thanks again for your contributions. I see that you first registered over two years ago. Sorry it took so long, but I'm glad you ''finally'' got a formal welcome!  +++$+++ :Thanks for the pie, and thanks again for your contributions. I see that you first registered over two years ago. Sorry it took so long, but I'm glad you ''finally'' got a formal welcome! [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 20:53, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

687 +++$+++ Hassocks5489 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 687 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.311992220E09 +++$+++ Hi Mandarax.  Pls see [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Ineligible article in Prep 2]] in relation to [[Grade II listed buildings in Brighton and Hove: M\u200e]], which I created (well, started in a small way!)  I concur with your comments; this should not go forward for DYK.  Cheers, <font face=\"Helvetica\"> +++$+++ Hi Mandarax.  Pls see [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Ineligible article in Prep 2]] in relation to [[Grade II listed buildings in Brighton and Hove: M‎]], which I created (well, started in a small way!)  I concur with your comments; this should not go forward for DYK.  Cheers, <font face="Helvetica">[[User:Hassocks5489|<font color="#00BFFF"><b>Hassocks</b></font>]][[User talk:Hassocks5489|<font color="#228B22">5489<small> (tickets please!)</small></font>]]</font> 19:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
688 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 687 +++$+++ 687 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311996060E09 +++$+++ I hadn't noticed it when it was on the nomination page, but checking from the history I see that you said virtually the same thing I did. It's refreshing to see someone who isn't trying to bend every rule to do everything possible to get an article into DYK. I greatly respect that. Thanks for your note.  +++$+++ :I hadn't noticed it when it was on the nomination page, but checking from the history I see that you said virtually the same thing I did. It's refreshing to see someone who isn't trying to bend every rule to do everything possible to get an article into DYK. I greatly respect that. Thanks for your note. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 20:21, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

689 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.312368240E09 +++$+++ Well then, if I can't get it right myself, I have no right to whinge in the edit summary, do I?  +++$+++ Well then, if I can't get it right myself, I have no right to whinge in the edit summary, do I? [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 03:44, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
690 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 689 +++$+++ 689 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.312370880E09 +++$+++ Hehe. Well, you got it righter than it was, so a gnome like me could then come along and {{diff2|442781329|polish it}}. I've admired your contributions from afar for a long time, and this seems like as good a time as any to congratulate you on your wonderful work here.  +++$+++ :Hehe. Well, you got it righter than it was, so a gnome like me could then come along and {{diff2|442781329|polish it}}. I've admired your contributions from afar for a long time, and this seems like as good a time as any to congratulate you on your wonderful work here. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 04:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
691 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 689 +++$+++ 690 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312449600E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 02:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

524979 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-15 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.140045180E09 +++$+++ re picture added to [[Submandibular gland]], is there a way within infoboxes to adjust the size of the image used? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Gray602.png Image:Gray602.png] clearly should not be used at its full size, but the current sizing seems too small. I tried ''Gray602.png|300px|'' but I can't get this to work in an infobox +++$+++ re picture added to [[Submandibular gland]], is there a way within infoboxes to adjust the size of the image used? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gray602.png Image:Gray602.png] clearly should not be used at its full size, but the current sizing seems too small. I tried ''Gray602.png|300px|'' but I can't get this to work in an infobox[[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 15:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
524980 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524979 +++$+++ 524979 +++$+++ 2006-02-15 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.140046980E09 +++$+++ I have responded at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy]]. -- +++$+++ :I have responded at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 15:43, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

692 +++$+++ Johnson487682 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.312402020E09 +++$+++ I had to undo your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Calendar_date&action=historysubmit&diff=442797282&oldid=438914362 recent edit] via AWB.  The month name in this example is ''supposed'' to be in lowercase, as explained in the text that follows the bullet item.  +++$+++ I had to undo your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calendar_date&action=historysubmit&diff=442797282&oldid=438914362 recent edit] via AWB.  The month name in this example is ''supposed'' to be in lowercase, as explained in the text that follows the bullet item. [[User:Johnson487682|Johnson487682]] ([[User talk:Johnson487682|talk]]) 13:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
693 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 692 +++$+++ 692 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312418160E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for catching that. I've added {{tl|sic}} templates to prevent any more such accidental \"corrections\".  +++$+++ :Thank you very much for catching that. I've added {{tl|sic}} templates to prevent any more such accidental "corrections". [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 17:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
694 +++$+++ Johnson487682 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 692 +++$+++ 693 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.312509300E09 +++$+++ Great solution--thank you!  +++$+++ ::Great solution--thank you! [[User:Johnson487682|Johnson487682]] ([[User talk:Johnson487682|talk]]) 18:55, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

524982 +++$+++ Anville +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-18 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.140279420E09 +++$+++ Best wishes,  +++$+++ Best wishes, [[User:Anville|Anville]] 08:17, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
524983 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524982 +++$+++ 524982 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.140295320E09 +++$+++ Very nice work. Much better than it was a week ago. You may want to consider submitting it for peer review. There could be a featured article in there. A quibble: ''leaving his approval in a sense \"formal\"'' -- this phrase confused me, since the word 'formal' seemed to emphasize Leo's approval, while the prior phrase de-emphasized it. Also, the phrase ''Following a publication practice still seen today'' seems unnecessary. -- +++$+++ :Very nice work. Much better than it was a week ago. You may want to consider submitting it for peer review. There could be a featured article in there. A quibble: ''leaving his approval in a sense "formal"'' -- this phrase confused me, since the word 'formal' seemed to emphasize Leo's approval, while the prior phrase de-emphasized it. Also, the phrase ''Following a publication practice still seen today'' seems unnecessary. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 12:42, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
524984 +++$+++ Anville +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524982 +++$+++ 524983 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.140307080E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I agree on the \"formal\" bit; I don't know the best way to convey what ''in forma specifica'' connotes.  Perhaps \"token\" would be the better word.   I shall hop on over and make a couple edits to reflect your points.  Best,  +++$+++ :: Thanks.  I agree on the "formal" bit; I don't know the best way to convey what ''in forma specifica'' connotes.  Perhaps "token" would be the better word.   I shall hop on over and make a couple edits to reflect your points.  Best, [[User:Anville|Anville]] 15:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
524985 +++$+++ Anville +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524982 +++$+++ 524983 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.140308220E09 +++$+++ P.S.  After making said changes, I posted the article to [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Comma Johanneum\/archive1|peer review]].   +++$+++ :: P.S.  After making said changes, I posted the article to [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Comma Johanneum/archive1|peer review]].  [[User:Anville|Anville]] 16:17, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

695 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312428000E09 +++$+++ and every day, transcluded a new one of them? They would show up the same on T:TDYK (see, e.g., [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&oldid=442899558#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_August_4]), but when someone clicked the \"edit\" link to nominate something, they would end up transcluding their nom on [[Template talk:Did you know\/Archive\/2011 August 4]] rather than on T:TDYK directly. Then there would be no need to \"archive\" that day later (since it would already be in an archive); just remove <code><nowiki>{{Template talk:Did you know\/Archive\/2011 August 4}}<\/nowiki><\/code> from T:TDYK and we'd be set. I think this is pretty much what they do at AfD as well. <b class=\"IPA\">[[Special:Contributions\/Rjanag|r<font color=\"#8B0000\">\u02a8<\/font>ana\u0262]]<\/b>&nbsp;( +++$+++ and every day, transcluded a new one of them? They would show up the same on T:TDYK (see, e.g., [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&oldid=442899558#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_August_4]), but when someone clicked the "edit" link to nominate something, they would end up transcluding their nom on [[Template talk:Did you know/Archive/2011 August 4]] rather than on T:TDYK directly. Then there would be no need to "archive" that day later (since it would already be in an archive); just remove <code><nowiki>{{Template talk:Did you know/Archive/2011 August 4}}</nowiki></code> from T:TDYK and we'd be set. I think this is pretty much what they do at AfD as well. <b class="IPA">[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;([[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]) 20:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
696 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 695 +++$+++ 695 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.312437480E09 +++$+++ That seems fine to me, but might some people get confused editing something with \"Archive\" in the title? They're often cautioned not to edit archives. If it's done, I don't know if we need to add an instructional comment for people who may attempt to add a nomination by editing the full T:TDYK; I know ''I'' would never do it that way, but maybe ''someone'' would. Did you want to start this right away? I probably won't be around for today's \"zero hour\".  +++$+++ :That seems fine to me, but might some people get confused editing something with "Archive" in the title? They're often cautioned not to edit archives. If it's done, I don't know if we need to add an instructional comment for people who may attempt to add a nomination by editing the full T:TDYK; I know ''I'' would never do it that way, but maybe ''someone'' would. Did you want to start this right away? I probably won't be around for today's "zero hour". [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 22:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
697 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 695 +++$+++ 696 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312449600E09 +++$+++ That's a good point. Maybe it would be better to call it \"Log\" instead of \"Archive\" (a la AfD) or something like that. <b class=\"IPA\">[[Special:Contributions\/Rjanag|r<font color=\"#8B0000\">\u02a8<\/font>ana\u0262]]<\/b>&nbsp;( +++$+++ ::That's a good point. Maybe it would be better to call it "Log" instead of "Archive" (a la AfD) or something like that. <b class="IPA">[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;([[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]) 02:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

698 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 698 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312515120E09 +++$+++ Let's go ahead and try it. I created [[Template talk:Did you know\/Daily log\/2011 August 5]] up through [[Template talk:Did you know\/Daily log\/2011 August 13]], so when the next \"zero hour\" comes soon, instead of adding a new section header we can just add <code><nowiki>{{Template talk:Did you know\/Daily log\/2011 August 15}}<\/nowiki><\/code>. I think I'll be online, so if you won't be around to do it I can. After a day or two, if it seems to be confusing people we can go back to the normal way. <b class=\"IPA\">[[Special:Contributions\/Rjanag|r<font color=\"#8B0000\">\u02a8<\/font>ana\u0262]]<\/b>&nbsp;( +++$+++ Let's go ahead and try it. I created [[Template talk:Did you know/Daily log/2011 August 5]] up through [[Template talk:Did you know/Daily log/2011 August 13]], so when the next "zero hour" comes soon, instead of adding a new section header we can just add <code><nowiki>{{Template talk:Did you know/Daily log/2011 August 15}}</nowiki></code>. I think I'll be online, so if you won't be around to do it I can. After a day or two, if it seems to be confusing people we can go back to the normal way. <b class="IPA">[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;([[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]) 20:32, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
699 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 698 +++$+++ 698 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312517400E09 +++$+++ I've corrected the \"Archive\" part to \"Daily log\" and also changed \"becomes empty\" to \"is complete\", since the section won't really be \"empty\". Of course, feel free to tweak it as you see fit. I only did August 5 so there won't be duplicated efforts in case you want different wording.  +++$+++ :I've corrected the "Archive" part to "Daily log" and also changed "becomes empty" to "is complete", since the section won't really be "empty". Of course, feel free to tweak it as you see fit. I only did August 5 so there won't be duplicated efforts in case you want different wording. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 21:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
700 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 698 +++$+++ 699 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.312517520E09 +++$+++ That sounds good. Thanks for catching that. <b class=\"IPA\">[[Special:Contributions\/Rjanag|r<font color=\"#8B0000\">\u02a8<\/font>ana\u0262]]<\/b>&nbsp;( +++$+++ ::That sounds good. Thanks for catching that. <b class="IPA">[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;([[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]) 21:12, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
701 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 698 +++$+++ 700 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.312528080E09 +++$+++ Oops. I accidentally {{diff2|443100867|pressed Enter}} while writing the edit summary before I had a chance to complete it or put in the correct date.  Thanks for your speedy fix.  +++$+++ :::Oops. I accidentally {{diff2|443100867|pressed Enter}} while writing the edit summary before I had a chance to complete it or put in the correct date.  Thanks for your speedy fix. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 00:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

476607 +++$+++ Wikid77 +++$+++ JHunterJ +++$+++ 476607 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-16 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.239907320E09 +++$+++ I had tagged the [[MOS:DAB]] with {{tl2|pov|guideline}} to indicate an ongoing [[WP:NPOV dispute]]. Per long-term Wikipedia policy, such a tag should not be removed during the process of resolving the dispute. I am NOT angry at you for ranting with your message \"Disruptive edits\" but please, let this be a wake-up, that you tend to jump to conclusions, which violate Wikipedia policy. Here's a hint: If a Wikipedia editor is experienced enough to use a POV-tag and\/or [[Template:ombox]], then consider, politely, asking them why they added those into a page, rather than claim disruption. Just a word to the wise... - +++$+++ I had tagged the [[MOS:DAB]] with {{tl2|pov|guideline}} to indicate an ongoing [[WP:NPOV dispute]]. Per long-term Wikipedia policy, such a tag should not be removed during the process of resolving the dispute. I am NOT angry at you for ranting with your message "Disruptive edits" but please, let this be a wake-up, that you tend to jump to conclusions, which violate Wikipedia policy. Here's a hint: If a Wikipedia editor is experienced enough to use a POV-tag and/or [[Template:ombox]], then consider, politely, asking them why they added those into a page, rather than claim disruption. Just a word to the wise... -[[User:Wikid77|Wikid77]] ([[User talk:Wikid77|talk]]) 11:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
476608 +++$+++ JHunterJ +++$+++ JHunterJ +++$+++ 476607 +++$+++ 476607 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.239909240E09 +++$+++ As was answered then, one lone voice crying out against consensus does not make a dispute. I am NOT angry at you for mistaking my activity for ranting, but please, let this be a wake-up. If a Wikipedia editor is experienced enough to use the tags, then I expect them to be considerate and polite and work with consensus. You have been engaged in discussion about your misunderstanding of the purpose of disambiguation pages on the project talk pages; there is no need to disrupt the project pages themselves during this discussion. --  +++$+++ :As was answered then, one lone voice crying out against consensus does not make a dispute. I am NOT angry at you for mistaking my activity for ranting, but please, let this be a wake-up. If a Wikipedia editor is experienced enough to use the tags, then I expect them to be considerate and polite and work with consensus. You have been engaged in discussion about your misunderstanding of the purpose of disambiguation pages on the project talk pages; there is no need to disrupt the project pages themselves during this discussion. -- [[User:JHunterJ|JHunterJ]] ([[User talk:JHunterJ#top|talk]]) 12:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

524988 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-21 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.140529680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for finding and tagging additional human anatomy stubs. May I suggest (since you are finding so many) that you take a look at the sub-categories of {{tl|anatomy-stub}}, such as {{tl|circulatory-stub}} which is used for articles about the circulatory system and {{tl|neuroscience-stub}} which is used for articles about the anatomy as well as the physiology of the nervous system. These additional sub-category stubs were created to make it easier to find and sort stub articles so that {{tl|anatomy-stub}} would not contain such a huge collection of varied articles. -- +++$+++ Thanks for finding and tagging additional human anatomy stubs. May I suggest (since you are finding so many) that you take a look at the sub-categories of {{tl|anatomy-stub}}, such as {{tl|circulatory-stub}} which is used for articles about the circulatory system and {{tl|neuroscience-stub}} which is used for articles about the anatomy as well as the physiology of the nervous system. These additional sub-category stubs were created to make it easier to find and sort stub articles so that {{tl|anatomy-stub}} would not contain such a huge collection of varied articles. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] 05:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
524989 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524988 +++$+++ 524988 +++$+++ 2006-02-23 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.140755820E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the suggestion. I will try. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the suggestion. I will try. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 20:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

702 +++$+++ Bgwhite +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.312553700E09 +++$+++ I just noticed the big fat lie you have on your user page. You are currently 26th, not 25th, in the list of Wikipedians by the number of edits.  Egads, do I trust what you have to say in the future because you obviously lie any chance you get. :)   +++$+++ I just noticed the big fat lie you have on your user page. You are currently 26th, not 25th, in the list of Wikipedians by the number of edits.  Egads, do I trust what you have to say in the future because you obviously lie any chance you get. :)  [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 07:15, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
703 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 702 +++$+++ 702 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 08:15:00 +++$+++ 1.312557300E09 +++$+++ Yes, I do. I just corrected it only because I got caught.<p>I used to update it every week because it kept going up, but then it stabilized at 25 and I stopped checking. Now, thanks to you hogging all of the sort key edits, my contributions have dropped dramatically and I expect to be in a downward spiral.  +++$+++ :Yes, I do. I just corrected it only because I got caught.<p>I used to update it every week because it kept going up, but then it stabilized at 25 and I stopped checking. Now, thanks to you hogging all of the sort key edits, my contributions have dropped dramatically and I expect to be in a downward spiral. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 08:15, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
704 +++$+++ Bgwhite +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 702 +++$+++ 703 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 08:44:00 +++$+++ 1.312559040E09 +++$+++ Hey, if you want to do some Arabic or Chinese listas, I've got a bunch for you.  I know you are really want to do them.  Thanks to my \"hogging\", I should crack the top 500 in the next week or two.  So, if I stay off my anti-psychotic drugs, I should catch you in 3-4 years.  I got told today to stop sorting Arabic names because no Arabic name has a surname and I'm not a professional indexer. I think you need some of that joy.  +++$+++ ::Hey, if you want to do some Arabic or Chinese listas, I've got a bunch for you.  I know you are really want to do them.  Thanks to my "hogging", I should crack the top 500 in the next week or two.  So, if I stay off my anti-psychotic drugs, I should catch you in 3-4 years.  I got told today to stop sorting Arabic names because no Arabic name has a surname and I'm not a professional indexer. I think you need some of that joy. [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 08:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
705 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 702 +++$+++ 704 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312600200E09 +++$+++ I've always avoided those. I know from watching others who have tried that there is a very vocal contingent with very strong opinions on the subject, and I'd rather just stay out of it. But kudos to you for going for it.  +++$+++ :::I've always avoided those. I know from watching others who have tried that there is a very vocal contingent with very strong opinions on the subject, and I'd rather just stay out of it. But kudos to you for going for it. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 20:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
706 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 702 +++$+++ 702 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312600200E09 +++$+++ Was that from ''[[The Princess Bride]]'' (which I've never seen)?  Whatever it's from, I can easily picture her delivering those lines.  +++$+++ :Was that from ''[[The Princess Bride]]'' (which I've never seen)?  Whatever it's from, I can easily picture her delivering those lines. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 20:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
707 +++$+++ Bgwhite +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 702 +++$+++ 706 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.312602540E09 +++$+++ Yup, it is from the Princess Bride. It's [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=D58LpHBnvsI&feature=related inconceivable] that you haven't seen it. It is one of the all-time great books and films.  +++$+++ ::Yup, it is from the Princess Bride. It's [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D58LpHBnvsI&feature=related inconceivable] that you haven't seen it. It is one of the all-time great books and films. [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 20:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
708 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 702 +++$+++ 707 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312608000E09 +++$+++ Okay, I found it: [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=D9tAKLTktY0 about three minutes in].  +++$+++ :::Okay, I found it: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9tAKLTktY0 about three minutes in]. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 22:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
709 +++$+++ LadyofShalott +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 702 +++$+++ 708 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.312609920E09 +++$+++ Mandarax, you've got to see ''The Princess Bride''. It's fantastic. BG, it's one of the only movies I've seen where I actually like the movie better than the book (though I did enjoy that as well). <font face=\"Lucida Calligraphy\"> +++$+++ ::::Mandarax, you've got to see ''The Princess Bride''. It's fantastic. BG, it's one of the only movies I've seen where I actually like the movie better than the book (though I did enjoy that as well). <font face="Lucida Calligraphy">[[User:LadyofShalott|<font color="#ee3399">Lady</font>]]<font color="#0095c6">of</font>[[User_Talk:LadyofShalott|<font color="#442288">Shalott</font>]]</font> 22:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
710 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 702 +++$+++ 709 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.312630500E09 +++$+++ Hehe, an edit summary of \"watch it!!\", especially from an admin, looks like it would be a stern warning. I tend to be a finicky movie viewer, but I've put it on my list of movies to see some day. (No, not Netflix, just a plain old paper list.)  +++$+++ :::::Hehe, an edit summary of "watch it!!", especially from an admin, looks like it would be a stern warning. I tend to be a finicky movie viewer, but I've put it on my list of movies to see some day. (No, not Netflix, just a plain old paper list.) [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 04:35, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
711 +++$+++ LadyofShalott +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ 702 +++$+++ 710 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.312634220E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the ambiguity there. :) I don't do Netflix either, and I have to admit that there are lots of movies that \"everyone\" has seen which I have not. I do highly recommend TPB though. <font face=\"Lucida Calligraphy\"> +++$+++ ::::::Sorry for the ambiguity there. :) I don't do Netflix either, and I have to admit that there are lots of movies that "everyone" has seen which I have not. I do highly recommend TPB though. <font face="Lucida Calligraphy">[[User:LadyofShalott|<font color="#ee3399">Lady</font>]]<font color="#0095c6">of</font>[[User_Talk:LadyofShalott|<font color="#442288">Shalott</font>]]</font> 05:37, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

524992 +++$+++ Hardin_MD +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-23 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.140746820E09 +++$+++ Also, is it possible to retain the thumbnail indicator when the image is inside the infobox?  +++$+++ Also, is it possible to retain the thumbnail indicator when the image is inside the infobox? [[User:Hardin_MD|HMD]] 18:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
524993 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524992 +++$+++ 524992 +++$+++ 2006-02-23 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.140755760E09 +++$+++ That's a tricky question, but I'll answer the best I can. For almost every other type of page on Wikipedia (movies, albums, countries, medicines, world leaders, chemicals, etc.) the first image appears within the infobox, not after it. However, the infobox for diseases is relatively new and undeveloped compared to these other categories. The template only dates back to June 5 2005, and the image field ony dates back to January 6 2006. Most of the discussions about it in the past have taken place at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine]] and [[Template talk:Infobox Disease]]. So for the general case of how it should be handled, I'd recommend that you post a message there. For your specific case of [[strep throat]], I have moved the image back out of the infobox to your original location. -- +++$+++ :That's a tricky question, but I'll answer the best I can. For almost every other type of page on Wikipedia (movies, albums, countries, medicines, world leaders, chemicals, etc.) the first image appears within the infobox, not after it. However, the infobox for diseases is relatively new and undeveloped compared to these other categories. The template only dates back to June 5 2005, and the image field ony dates back to January 6 2006. Most of the discussions about it in the past have taken place at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine]] and [[Template talk:Infobox Disease]]. So for the general case of how it should be handled, I'd recommend that you post a message there. For your specific case of [[strep throat]], I have moved the image back out of the infobox to your original location. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 20:36, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

262849 +++$+++ delldot +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-02 09:44:00 +++$+++ 1.201974240E09 +++$+++ Hi Colin, I wondered if I could ask a favor.  SandyGeorgia recommended that I ask you for a review of [[concussion]], and I saw your great comments at [[WP:Peer review\/Reactive attachment disorder]].  I'd love it if you could comment at [[WP:Peer review\/Concussion|the review of concussion]].  There have been several comments on the writing, but no one has really thoroughly evaluated the accuracy.  Any help you could offer would be very much appreciated.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Colin, I wondered if I could ask a favor.  SandyGeorgia recommended that I ask you for a review of [[concussion]], and I saw your great comments at [[WP:Peer review/Reactive attachment disorder]].  I'd love it if you could comment at [[WP:Peer review/Concussion|the review of concussion]].  There have been several comments on the writing, but no one has really thoroughly evaluated the accuracy.  Any help you could offer would be very much appreciated.  Thanks, [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small> 09:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
262850 +++$+++ delldot +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262849 +++$+++ 262849 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.202188740E09 +++$+++ On the contrary, this was very helpful!  Thanks for taking the time out of your busy schedule to do it.   +++$+++ :On the contrary, this was very helpful!  Thanks for taking the time out of your busy schedule to do it.  [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small> 21:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

524994 +++$+++ Hardin_MD +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-23 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.140756480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the infomative reply -- I wasn't really questioning your putting the image in the infobox; appearance-wise I don't think it makes much difference. It is better, though, I think, to have the thumbnail indicator -- Is it possible to have that inside the infobox?  +++$+++ Thanks for the infomative reply -- I wasn't really questioning your putting the image in the infobox; appearance-wise I don't think it makes much difference. It is better, though, I think, to have the thumbnail indicator -- Is it possible to have that inside the infobox? [[User:Hardin_MD|HMD]] 20:48, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
524995 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524994 +++$+++ 524994 +++$+++ 2006-02-23 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.140756960E09 +++$+++ I have now added a thumbnail indicator in the infobox ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3AInfobox_Disease&diff=40909090&oldid=40899715 diff], example of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Strep_throat&oldid=40857125 use]). -- +++$+++ :I have now added a thumbnail indicator in the infobox ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AInfobox_Disease&diff=40909090&oldid=40899715 diff], example of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strep_throat&oldid=40857125 use]). --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 20:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

480715 +++$+++ Ilyanep +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480715 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-21 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.140589560E09 +++$+++ If I get some time over the weekend I will play around a little with the Mind Benders things, but you can add a few questions if you like because I seem to be forgetting\/procrastinating\/not having enough time. &mdash; [[User:Ilyanep|<span style=\"font-variant:Small-caps;color:black;\">Ilyan<\/span>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style=\"font-variant:Small-caps;color:green;\">e<\/span>]] +++$+++ If I get some time over the weekend I will play around a little with the Mind Benders things, but you can add a few questions if you like because I seem to be forgetting/procrastinating/not having enough time. &mdash; [[User:Ilyanep|<span style="font-variant:Small-caps;color:black;">Ilyan</span>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="font-variant:Small-caps;color:green;">e</span>]][[User:Ilyanep|<span style="font-variant:Small-caps;color:black;">p</span>]][[User talk:Ilyanep| <span style="font-variant:Small-caps;color:#808080;">(Talk)</span>]] 22:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
480716 +++$+++ Celestianpower +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480715 +++$+++ 480715 +++$+++ 2006-02-21 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.140590640E09 +++$+++ So, I'm to go off reviewing everyone else's pages? --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color=\"green\">[[WP:ESP|es]]<\/font> +++$+++ : So, I'm to go off reviewing everyone else's pages? --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color="green">[[WP:ESP|es]]</font>[[User:celestianpower|tianpower]] <sup>[[user talk:Celestianpower|háblame]]</sup> 22:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

524996 +++$+++ Hardin_MD +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524996 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-23 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.140759600E09 +++$+++ Sorry to be dense -- I still don't see the thumbnail indicator in your example of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Strep_throat&oldid=40857125 use]. Could you just go ahead and put the image with thumbnail indicator inside the infobox. That way I'll be able to see how it works.  +++$+++ Sorry to be dense -- I still don't see the thumbnail indicator in your example of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strep_throat&oldid=40857125 use]. Could you just go ahead and put the image with thumbnail indicator inside the infobox. That way I'll be able to see how it works. [[User:Hardin_MD|HMD]] 21:40, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
524997 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524996 +++$+++ 524996 +++$+++ 2006-02-23 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.140760560E09 +++$+++ In that case, I don't really understand what you are asking for. I have reverted the change I made to [[Template:Infobox Disease]], so everything is exactly back to the way you originally had it. Instead of discussing it here, I recommend that you post your request at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine]] or [[Template talk:Infobox Disease]]. I don't think I can provide you with what you are looking for, but it is more likely that you can find someone else who can if you post at one of those places. -- +++$+++ : In that case, I don't really understand what you are asking for. I have reverted the change I made to [[Template:Infobox Disease]], so everything is exactly back to the way you originally had it. Instead of discussing it here, I recommend that you post your request at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine]] or [[Template talk:Infobox Disease]]. I don't think I can provide you with what you are looking for, but it is more likely that you can find someone else who can if you post at one of those places. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 21:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

262853 +++$+++ Fainites +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262853 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-10 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.202707500E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know I nominated this for FAC.  +++$+++ Just to let you know I nominated this for FAC. [[User:Fainites|Fainites]] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Fainites|barley]]</small></sup> 21:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
262854 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262853 +++$+++ 262853 +++$+++ 2008-02-11 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.202788140E09 +++$+++ FYI, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates#List_articles_as_FA_versus_FL_again].   +++$+++ * FYI, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates#List_articles_as_FA_versus_FL_again].  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
262855 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262853 +++$+++ 262854 +++$+++ 2008-02-11 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.202789100E09 +++$+++ As well, there is currently an FLRC  to [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates\/List of members of the Commonwealth of Nations|remove three lists that are basically clones of eachother]] and I wanted to delist them the proper way so they could be merged. Could you take a look at it? --  +++$+++ **As well, there is currently an FLRC  to [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of members of the Commonwealth of Nations|remove three lists that are basically clones of eachother]] and I wanted to delist them the proper way so they could be merged. Could you take a look at it? -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 20:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

524998 +++$+++ Hardin_MD +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524998 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-23 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.140763560E09 +++$+++ What I'm asking is that you revert back to the first change you made -- putting the image inside the infobox -- with the thumbnail indicator included, if that's possible.  +++$+++ What I'm asking is that you revert back to the first change you made -- putting the image inside the infobox -- with the thumbnail indicator included, if that's possible. [[User:Hardin_MD|HMD]] 22:46, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
524999 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524998 +++$+++ 524998 +++$+++ 2006-02-23 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.140764460E09 +++$+++ I have moved the image back into the infobox. I don't know how to provide the thumbnail indicator you are looking for. Please direct further requests to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine]] or [[Template talk:Infobox Disease]], or [[Talk:Strep throat]] rather than here, to make it easier for future editors to follow these discussions. -- +++$+++ :I have moved the image back into the infobox. I don't know how to provide the thumbnail indicator you are looking for. Please direct further requests to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine]] or [[Template talk:Infobox Disease]], or [[Talk:Strep throat]] rather than here, to make it easier for future editors to follow these discussions. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
525000 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524998 +++$+++ 524998 +++$+++ 2006-03-04 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.141508640E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Happy to be of service. -- +++$+++ :You're welcome. Happy to be of service. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 13:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
525001 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524998 +++$+++ 524998 +++$+++ 2006-03-10 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.142016900E09 +++$+++ I have renamed the pages listed at [[List of ICD-10 codes]], so they now use the roman numerals. -- +++$+++ :I have renamed the pages listed at [[List of ICD-10 codes]], so they now use the roman numerals. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 10:55, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

713 +++$+++ Lucy-marie +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ 713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-25 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.277502780E09 +++$+++ Talk on the top gear talk page not my user page for a real wide ranging discussion.-- +++$+++ Talk on the top gear talk page not my user page for a real wide ranging discussion.--[[User:Lucy-marie|Lucy-marie]] ([[User talk:Lucy-marie|talk]]) 14:53, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
714 +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ 713 +++$+++ 713 +++$+++ 2010-06-25 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.277528460E09 +++$+++ Nope, I can't be bothered any more. You clearly can't be bothered to address my valid point and I have better things to do with my time. And by Sunday evening it will all be academic anyway. Want another ref: try here [http:\/\/www.topgear.com\/uk\/photos\/tg-15-episode-1_rehearsals?imageNo=3]. Top Gear website authoritative enough for you on Top Gear matters? Same website, but doesn't say \"blog\" at the top of the page. Makes all the difference - not. Suggest you read [[WP:NEWSBLOG]].  +++$+++ :Nope, I can't be bothered any more. You clearly can't be bothered to address my valid point and I have better things to do with my time. And by Sunday evening it will all be academic anyway. Want another ref: try here [http://www.topgear.com/uk/photos/tg-15-episode-1_rehearsals?imageNo=3]. Top Gear website authoritative enough for you on Top Gear matters? Same website, but doesn't say "blog" at the top of the page. Makes all the difference - not. Suggest you read [[WP:NEWSBLOG]]. [[User:Halsteadk|Halsteadk]] ([[User talk:Halsteadk#top|talk]]) 22:01, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
715 +++$+++ Lucy-marie +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ 713 +++$+++ 714 +++$+++ 2010-06-25 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.277534160E09 +++$+++ Please be aware other editors have since stated the content of your source has been confirmed as untrue.-- +++$+++ ::Please be aware other editors have since stated the content of your source has been confirmed as untrue.--[[User:Lucy-marie|Lucy-marie]] ([[User talk:Lucy-marie|talk]]) 23:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
716 +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ 713 +++$+++ 715 +++$+++ 2010-06-26 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.277575680E09 +++$+++ I cannot believe this - are you actually familiar with the subject matter? I made it clear in my edit that the statement in the current edition of Top Gear Magazine (which I added a reference for by physically checking my own copy of the magazine - I even gave the specific page) had been contradicted by the subsequent statement on the Top Gear production team's blog (which no-one can yet say is untrue, and has been repeated twice on the Top Gear website). It is TRUE that the magazine wrote what they did, and it is TRUE that the production team have subsequently announced that it will not be what was said in the magazine - that is what we KNOW, and that is what I clearly WROTE.   +++$+++ :::I cannot believe this - are you actually familiar with the subject matter? I made it clear in my edit that the statement in the current edition of Top Gear Magazine (which I added a reference for by physically checking my own copy of the magazine - I even gave the specific page) had been contradicted by the subsequent statement on the Top Gear production team's blog (which no-one can yet say is untrue, and has been repeated twice on the Top Gear website). It is TRUE that the magazine wrote what they did, and it is TRUE that the production team have subsequently announced that it will not be what was said in the magazine - that is what we KNOW, and that is what I clearly WROTE.  [[User:Halsteadk|Halsteadk]] ([[User talk:Halsteadk#top|talk]]) 11:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
717 +++$+++ Fair Shannon +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ 713 +++$+++ 713 +++$+++ 2010-06-26 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.277619600E09 +++$+++ The source has been checked and is verifiable, reliable, and official. Therefore, Halsteadk's edits have been restored. Lucy-marie, just because a source happens to be a blog does '''not''' mean that it isn't credible (see [[WP:NEWSBLOG]]), and while most of the time such sources aren't, in this case, it is. In addition, you are not assuming good faith, and your edits may constitute an [[Wikipedia:edit_warring|edit war]]. I strongly advise you to take another look at Wikipedia's guidelines before you attempt to do this again.  +++$+++ :The source has been checked and is verifiable, reliable, and official. Therefore, Halsteadk's edits have been restored. Lucy-marie, just because a source happens to be a blog does '''not''' mean that it isn't credible (see [[WP:NEWSBLOG]]), and while most of the time such sources aren't, in this case, it is. In addition, you are not assuming good faith, and your edits may constitute an [[Wikipedia:edit_warring|edit war]]. I strongly advise you to take another look at Wikipedia's guidelines before you attempt to do this again. [[User:Fair Shannon|<font color='"maroon"' face="Comic Sans MS">Shannon!</font>]] [[User talk:Fair Shannon|<font color="aqua" face="Bookman Antiqua">''talk''</font>]] 23:20, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
718 +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ 713 +++$+++ 717 +++$+++ 2010-06-27 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.277654040E09 +++$+++ Thank you Shannon, you have helped to restore my fast withering faith that some Wikipedia editors do know what they are doing. The only reason we know that the statement in Top Gear Magazine is untrue (to which L-M referred to in her 2nd comment) is of course because of the entry in the Top Gear production team blog which she refuses to accept! Regards,  +++$+++ ::Thank you Shannon, you have helped to restore my fast withering faith that some Wikipedia editors do know what they are doing. The only reason we know that the statement in Top Gear Magazine is untrue (to which L-M referred to in her 2nd comment) is of course because of the entry in the Top Gear production team blog which she refuses to accept! Regards, [[User:Halsteadk|Halsteadk]] ([[User talk:Halsteadk#top|talk]]) 08:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

525002 +++$+++ SushiGeek +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-11 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.142066700E09 +++$+++ How do we change the pixel size of the image in question in the infobox? Check out [[Bryan Barker]]. The image hurts my eyes.  +++$+++ How do we change the pixel size of the image in question in the infobox? Check out [[Bryan Barker]]. The image hurts my eyes. [[User:SushiGeek|SushiGeek]] 00:45, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
525003 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525002 +++$+++ 525002 +++$+++ 2006-03-11 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.142067840E09 +++$+++ I've added an optional \"ImageWidth\" field. The default is 200 when it is omitted. As an [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bryan_Barker&diff=43223428&oldid=43220843 example], I set the width in [[Bryan Barker]] to 150. It still doesn't look perfect, but it's better. (The width of the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Bryanbarker.jpg source] image is 75, so by using a multiple of 75, it looks a little better than it did before.) Hope this helps. -- +++$+++ :I've added an optional "ImageWidth" field. The default is 200 when it is omitted. As an [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bryan_Barker&diff=43223428&oldid=43220843 example], I set the width in [[Bryan Barker]] to 150. It still doesn't look perfect, but it's better. (The width of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bryanbarker.jpg source] image is 75, so by using a multiple of 75, it looks a little better than it did before.) Hope this helps. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
525004 +++$+++ SushiGeek +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525002 +++$+++ 525003 +++$+++ 2006-03-11 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.142068080E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much. I changed it to 85, and it looks even better.  +++$+++ ::Thank you so much. I changed it to 85, and it looks even better. [[User:SushiGeek|SushiGeek]] 01:08, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

262263 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-01 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.291261740E09 +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Category:Worst Picture Golden Raspberry Award winners|deletion review]] of [[:Category:Worst Picture Golden Raspberry Award winners]]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> -- ''' +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Category:Worst Picture Golden Raspberry Award winners|deletion review]] of [[:Category:Worst Picture Golden Raspberry Award winners]]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 19:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
262264 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262263 +++$+++ 262263 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.291262400E09 +++$+++ My apologies for the slow response - I was called away from my computer. I see that the categories have been deleted in the meantime, and I am glad that you started a DRV, as it seems the best way forward. IIRC, there were a couple more delete votes than keep votes, and in my opinion the delete votes were more closely tied to policy, which was my reasoning for a deletion closure as opposed to a no consensus closure.  +++$+++ :My apologies for the slow response - I was called away from my computer. I see that the categories have been deleted in the meantime, and I am glad that you started a DRV, as it seems the best way forward. IIRC, there were a couple more delete votes than keep votes, and in my opinion the delete votes were more closely tied to policy, which was my reasoning for a deletion closure as opposed to a no consensus closure. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 20:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
262265 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262263 +++$+++ 262264 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.291262520E09 +++$+++ Wrong. You closed a DRV with 8 keep comments and 7 delete comments as \"delete\", with zero explanation as to why. Please improve your admin-related activities in the future, as this type of closure is poor form and inappropriate behavior that is unbecoming of an active admin. Thanks. -- ''' +++$+++ ::Wrong. You closed a DRV with 8 keep comments and 7 delete comments as "delete", with zero explanation as to why. Please improve your admin-related activities in the future, as this type of closure is poor form and inappropriate behavior that is unbecoming of an active admin. Thanks. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:02, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
262266 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262263 +++$+++ 262265 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.291262820E09 +++$+++ I posted further comments at the DRV. I don't agree that this was \"inappropriate behavior\", but we're all allowed to have our opinions.  +++$+++ :::I posted further comments at the DRV. I don't agree that this was "inappropriate behavior", but we're all allowed to have our opinions. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 20:07, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
262267 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262263 +++$+++ 262266 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.291262940E09 +++$+++ Please be more mindful of your closures in the future, especially when closing against consensus of the community, to better explain yourself in deletion discussions, as you failed to do so in this case. -- ''' +++$+++ ::::Please be more mindful of your closures in the future, especially when closing against consensus of the community, to better explain yourself in deletion discussions, as you failed to do so in this case. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:09, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

525005 +++$+++ Rewster +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-11 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.142092740E09 +++$+++ I would appreciate some tips on how to use the DiseaseDisorder infobox.  Is there a tutorial somewhere?  I tried to add the box to [[Infantile cortical hyperostosis]], but the codes do not seem to link correctly.  Thanks!  -- +++$+++ I would appreciate some tips on how to use the DiseaseDisorder infobox.  Is there a tutorial somewhere?  I tried to add the box to [[Infantile cortical hyperostosis]], but the codes do not seem to link correctly.  Thanks!  --[[User:Rewster|Rewster]] 07:59, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
525006 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525005 +++$+++ 525005 +++$+++ 2006-03-11 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.142149200E09 +++$+++ I have written a first draft of a tutorial and put it at [[Template:Infobox_Disease]], but if you have any further questions or suggestions, don't hesitate to ask. -- +++$+++ :I have written a first draft of a tutorial and put it at [[Template:Infobox_Disease]], but if you have any further questions or suggestions, don't hesitate to ask. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
525007 +++$+++ Rewster +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525005 +++$+++ 525005 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.142173800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for putting that tutorial together!  It will be very helpful.  -- +++$+++ :Thanks for putting that tutorial together!  It will be very helpful.  --[[User:Rewster|Rewster]] 06:30, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

719 +++$+++ Tomlock01 +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ 719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-17 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.282095120E09 +++$+++ Hi Halsteadk, thanks for your help at the FAC for The Judd School, good to hear you are a former pupil. Having thought about it, I probably should have asked you to be a co-nom, so apologies. Can you think of any ideas for sources that I might try to reduce the reliance on the Taylor book? Kind regards,  +++$+++ Hi Halsteadk, thanks for your help at the FAC for The Judd School, good to hear you are a former pupil. Having thought about it, I probably should have asked you to be a co-nom, so apologies. Can you think of any ideas for sources that I might try to reduce the reliance on the Taylor book? Kind regards, [[User:Tomlock01|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tomlock01|talk]]) 18:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
720 +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ 719 +++$+++ 719 +++$+++ 2010-08-17 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.282106880E09 +++$+++ Hi Tom, good work on the article - I hope the hard work pays off but at the very least the article is vastly improved! You could try the Tonbridge Historical Society - http:\/\/www.tonbridgehistory.org.uk - even if the website doesn't have more info they may have other sources listed or members might be able to help (I'm not a member). I doubt there will be much better than Taylor's book, but I would focus on trying to find alternative sources for anything that might be disputable or may have been superseded since 1988 (eg the school's reputation, not that it has decreased) - or perhaps the article doesn't need all of such statements. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Tom, good work on the article - I hope the hard work pays off but at the very least the article is vastly improved! You could try the Tonbridge Historical Society - http://www.tonbridgehistory.org.uk - even if the website doesn't have more info they may have other sources listed or members might be able to help (I'm not a member). I doubt there will be much better than Taylor's book, but I would focus on trying to find alternative sources for anything that might be disputable or may have been superseded since 1988 (eg the school's reputation, not that it has decreased) - or perhaps the article doesn't need all of such statements. Regards, [[User:Halsteadk|Halsteadk]] ([[User talk:Halsteadk#top|talk]]) 21:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
721 +++$+++ Tomlock01 +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ 719 +++$+++ 720 +++$+++ 2010-08-22 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.282546320E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I sent an email to the Tonbridge Historical Society but haven't heard anything back. I went to Tonbridge Library and looked for other sources and managed to find a few that gave a brief mention to the school, for example a book on the history of the English fur trade, and in total have added four additional sources to the article. I've also gone through and removed any statements like the university reputation sentence that can't be cited to a reliable, third party source. If you get a chance to take another look, I'd appreciate your comments and although you are a significant contributor to the article, if you could add a support\/oppose as appropriate that would be great because I can't see many people coming forward to review it. Best wishes,  +++$+++ ::Thanks! I sent an email to the Tonbridge Historical Society but haven't heard anything back. I went to Tonbridge Library and looked for other sources and managed to find a few that gave a brief mention to the school, for example a book on the history of the English fur trade, and in total have added four additional sources to the article. I've also gone through and removed any statements like the university reputation sentence that can't be cited to a reliable, third party source. If you get a chance to take another look, I'd appreciate your comments and although you are a significant contributor to the article, if you could add a support/oppose as appropriate that would be great because I can't see many people coming forward to review it. Best wishes, [[User:Tomlock01|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tomlock01|talk]]) 23:52, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
722 +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ 719 +++$+++ 719 +++$+++ 2010-09-11 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.284256200E09 +++$+++ Hmm, fair point - didn't realise it was so widely accepted in American English (it is generally discouraged and even frowned on in formal British English). As it's primarily an American subject I shall restrain myself!  +++$+++ :Hmm, fair point - didn't realise it was so widely accepted in American English (it is generally discouraged and even frowned on in formal British English). As it's primarily an American subject I shall restrain myself! [[User:Halsteadk|Halsteadk]] ([[User talk:Halsteadk#top|talk]]) 18:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

525008 +++$+++ Rewster +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525008 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-12 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.142220120E09 +++$+++ What is the best way to complete the infobox when an article, such as [[Nemaline myopathy]], has three OMIM and three DBB references?  (They list three types:  autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and Amish.)  I also found two eMedicine articles; can I link to both in the box?  Or might it be better to put them in an External links section?  Regards,  +++$+++ What is the best way to complete the infobox when an article, such as [[Nemaline myopathy]], has three OMIM and three DBB references?  (They list three types:  autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and Amish.)  I also found two eMedicine articles; can I link to both in the box?  Or might it be better to put them in an External links section?  Regards, [[User:Rewster|Rewster]] 19:22, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
525009 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525008 +++$+++ 525008 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.142226120E09 +++$+++ I've populated [[Nemaline myopathy]] as an example of how to do this, and added an explanation at [[Template:Infobox_Disease]]. -- +++$+++ :I've populated [[Nemaline myopathy]] as an example of how to do this, and added an explanation at [[Template:Infobox_Disease]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 21:02, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

723 +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ 723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-24 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.285341900E09 +++$+++ Please don't make this blind change again. The correct word in this case was \"remained\". Article: [[Winter of 2009\u20132010 in Europe]]  +++$+++ Please don't make this blind change again. The correct word in this case was "remained". Article: [[Winter of 2009–2010 in Europe]] [[User:Halsteadk|Halsteadk]] ([[User talk:Halsteadk|talk]]) 08:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
724 +++$+++ CmdrObot +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ 723 +++$+++ 723 +++$+++ 2010-09-24 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.285382280E09 +++$+++ My apologies. That's what you get for editing late at night I guess! Thanks for catching it. Cheers,  +++$+++ : My apologies. That's what you get for editing late at night I guess! Thanks for catching it. Cheers, [[User:CmdrObot|CmdrObot]] ([[User talk:CmdrObot|talk]]) 19:38, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

262868 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262868 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-02 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.204450440E09 +++$+++ I suggest you file at [[WP:RFCU]] as I suspect there are more socks than you've figured out. Let me know of it's progress. <span style=\"font-family: verdana;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ I suggest you file at [[WP:RFCU]] as I suspect there are more socks than you've figured out. Let me know of it's progress. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 01:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
262869 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262868 +++$+++ 262868 +++$+++ 2008-03-02 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.204520940E09 +++$+++ TOLD YOU we'd find a sock farm, see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FVr&diff=195391802&oldid=195388854]. <span style=\"font-family: verdana;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :TOLD YOU we'd find a sock farm, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FVr&diff=195391802&oldid=195388854]. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 21:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

611790 +++$+++ A Link to the Past +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.169547180E09 +++$+++ Just remember that you shouldn't call people and\/or edits idiotic; it's unnecessary and can only serve to get someone angry. Thank you. -  +++$+++ Just remember that you shouldn't call people and/or edits idiotic; it's unnecessary and can only serve to get someone angry. Thank you. - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] [[User talk:A Link to the Past|(talk)]] 02:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
611791 +++$+++ SUIT +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611790 +++$+++ 611790 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.169639040E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia isn't censored for younger children--<font face=\"comic sans ms\"> +++$+++ :Wikipedia isn't censored for younger children--<font face="comic sans ms">[[User:SUIT|<font color="gold">'''SU'''</font><font color="silver">'''IT'''</font>]]</font><sup>''[[Special:Contributions/SUIT|42]]''</sup> 03:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
611792 +++$+++ Tohru Honda13 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611790 +++$+++ 611791 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.169710080E09 +++$+++ That's what I told him on his talk page. Cheers. <span style=\"color:#ff0000\">\u2665<\/span> +++$+++ ::That's what I told him on his talk page. Cheers. <span style="color:#ff0000">♥</span>[[User:Tohru Honda13|<span style="color:#ff1493">'''Tohru Honda13'''</span>]]<span style="color:#ff0000">♥</span> 23:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

726 +++$+++ Dbachmann +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 726 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-07 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.162930440E09 +++$+++ thank you,  +++$+++ thank you, [[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|('''&#5839;''')]]</small> 12:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
727 +++$+++ Dbachmann +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 726 +++$+++ 726 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.162934820E09 +++$+++ no, please, by all means do fix these articles; I was just asking you to do so in a way that makes it less tedious to figure out what you are doing.  +++$+++ :no, please, by all means do fix these articles; I was just asking you to do so in a way that makes it less tedious to figure out what you are doing. [[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|('''&#5839;''')]]</small> 13:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

525017 +++$+++ AED +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-02 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.143987600E09 +++$+++ Hello, again! [[Vision loss]] currently redirects to [[Visual loss]], but I would like to see it changed so [[Visual loss]] redirects to [[Vision loss]]. (\"Vision loss\" gets 2,800,000 hits on Google, whereas \"Visual loss\" only gets 508,000 hits.) This seems to be an uncontroversial move per [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] and [[Help:Moving a page]]. Would you be willing to make this move for me? Thanks again! - +++$+++ Hello, again! [[Vision loss]] currently redirects to [[Visual loss]], but I would like to see it changed so [[Visual loss]] redirects to [[Vision loss]]. ("Vision loss" gets 2,800,000 hits on Google, whereas "Visual loss" only gets 508,000 hits.) This seems to be an uncontroversial move per [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] and [[Help:Moving a page]]. Would you be willing to make this move for me? Thanks again! -[[User:AED|AED]] 07:20, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
525018 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525017 +++$+++ 525017 +++$+++ 2006-04-13 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.144953960E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I overlooked this request the first time around. But it looks like Jfdwolff was able to take care of it. -- +++$+++ :Sorry, I overlooked this request the first time around. But it looks like Jfdwolff was able to take care of it. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 11:46, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

730 +++$+++ Kjoonlee +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.163844960E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you have been adding info to [[Korean language]]-related articles. Could you cite your sources, please? Some of it is difficult to believe or fact-check. --''' +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you have been adding info to [[Korean language]]-related articles. Could you cite your sources, please? Some of it is difficult to believe or fact-check. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 02:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
731 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 730 +++$+++ 730 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.163846280E09 +++$+++ Are you talking about the information about Korean dialectal diversity? I'm just trying to correct a common misperception that the Korean language and people are somehow less diverse than those of the other countries of the region. The truth is that the Korean language is many, many times more diverse than other so-called \"language families\" in Asia, such as the [[Turkic languages]] or the [[Japonic languages]]. The internal diversity of Turkic and Japonic is all very recently derived (except for perhaps the [[Chuvash language|Chuvash]] language among Turkic languages, although even Chuvash vocabulary is readily relatable to forms in other dialects of Turkic through the application of a few simple sound changes), like the diversity of, say, modern dialects of the [[French language]]. French is really just one branch of Vulgar Latin, and it should not be given the status of a \"language family\" just because it has mutated and diversified into a plethora of weird-sounding dialects over the course of the past millennium. The Korean \"language,\" on the other hand, subsumes many dialects that possess vocabulary that cannot be easily derived from any etymon attested in the Standard Korean dialects of Seoul or Pyeongyang, and much of the rest of the basic vocabulary of these dialects, despite being apparently related to that of Standard Korean, reflects a phonological form that must be extremely ancient, perhaps having diverged from the ancestral form of the word found in Standard Korean as many as 2000 years ago. This means that the Korean language is at least as diverse as the entire [[Romance languages|Romance language family]], and probably more so.  +++$+++ :Are you talking about the information about Korean dialectal diversity? I'm just trying to correct a common misperception that the Korean language and people are somehow less diverse than those of the other countries of the region. The truth is that the Korean language is many, many times more diverse than other so-called "language families" in Asia, such as the [[Turkic languages]] or the [[Japonic languages]]. The internal diversity of Turkic and Japonic is all very recently derived (except for perhaps the [[Chuvash language|Chuvash]] language among Turkic languages, although even Chuvash vocabulary is readily relatable to forms in other dialects of Turkic through the application of a few simple sound changes), like the diversity of, say, modern dialects of the [[French language]]. French is really just one branch of Vulgar Latin, and it should not be given the status of a "language family" just because it has mutated and diversified into a plethora of weird-sounding dialects over the course of the past millennium. The Korean "language," on the other hand, subsumes many dialects that possess vocabulary that cannot be easily derived from any etymon attested in the Standard Korean dialects of Seoul or Pyeongyang, and much of the rest of the basic vocabulary of these dialects, despite being apparently related to that of Standard Korean, reflects a phonological form that must be extremely ancient, perhaps having diverged from the ancestral form of the word found in Standard Korean as many as 2000 years ago. This means that the Korean language is at least as diverse as the entire [[Romance languages|Romance language family]], and probably more so. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 02:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
732 +++$+++ Kjoonlee +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 730 +++$+++ 731 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.163847000E09 +++$+++ Well you're not trying hard enough, I think. ;) The examples of Mongolian loanwords that you had added earlier were entirely unfamiliar to normal speakers of <del>Korean<\/del> Standard South Korean (unlike \uc1a1\uace8\ub9e4 or \ubcf4\ub77c\ub9e4), which got me suspicious. Now you've added another bit about Korean that's unsourced, and it's made me more suspicious. Please add your sources, or I'll have to delete the bit. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 02:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC) --''' +++$+++ ::Well you're not trying hard enough, I think. ;) The examples of Mongolian loanwords that you had added earlier were entirely unfamiliar to normal speakers of <del>Korean</del> Standard South Korean (unlike 송골매 or 보라매), which got me suspicious. Now you've added another bit about Korean that's unsourced, and it's made me more suspicious. Please add your sources, or I'll have to delete the bit. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 02:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC) --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 02:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
733 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 730 +++$+++ 732 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.163848800E09 +++$+++ Are you claiming that \uc624\ub2ac ''on\u016dy'' and \ub09c\ucd94\ub2c8 ''n\u0101nchuni'' are '''not''' loanwords from Mongolian? As far as I know, ''on\u016dy'' is the only word in common use in Korea to indicate specifically the notch of an arrow. Those words are very good examples of loanwords from Mongolian because they are traceable back to the time of the earliest Hangeul documents (in which ''n\u0101nchuni'' appeared as \ub098\uce5c ''nachin'', which is even closer to the standard Khalkha form) and their Mongolian origin seems to be certain. \uc1a1\uace8\ub9e4, on the other hand, is probably not even a direct loan from Mongolian; from what I have seen, it appears to have been borrowed into Korean through Chinese.  +++$+++ :::Are you claiming that 오늬 ''onŭy'' and 난추니 ''nānchuni'' are '''not''' loanwords from Mongolian? As far as I know, ''onŭy'' is the only word in common use in Korea to indicate specifically the notch of an arrow. Those words are very good examples of loanwords from Mongolian because they are traceable back to the time of the earliest Hangeul documents (in which ''nānchuni'' appeared as 나친 ''nachin'', which is even closer to the standard Khalkha form) and their Mongolian origin seems to be certain. 송골매, on the other hand, is probably not even a direct loan from Mongolian; from what I have seen, it appears to have been borrowed into Korean through Chinese. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 03:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
734 +++$+++ Kjoonlee +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 730 +++$+++ 733 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.163849460E09 +++$+++ No, I'm claiming that they're not good examples unless you cite sources. --''' +++$+++ ::::No, I'm claiming that they're not good examples unless you cite sources. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 03:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
735 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 730 +++$+++ 734 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.163850420E09 +++$+++ This is nothing more than what one could find in any dictionary of the Korean language, such as the Yahoo! online dictionary. There has to be a limit to what we require citation of sources for, or else we will have people adding links to dictionary entries. Such citations are really unnecessary; anyone could go and look up the word in a dictionary for themselves if they wanted to confirm the definition of the word, its etymology, and its history of attestation.  +++$+++ :::::This is nothing more than what one could find in any dictionary of the Korean language, such as the Yahoo! online dictionary. There has to be a limit to what we require citation of sources for, or else we will have people adding links to dictionary entries. Such citations are really unnecessary; anyone could go and look up the word in a dictionary for themselves if they wanted to confirm the definition of the word, its etymology, and its history of attestation. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 03:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
736 +++$+++ Kjoonlee +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 730 +++$+++ 735 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.163850540E09 +++$+++ You must have read it somewhere, no? You didn't find it out in a dictionary.. --''' +++$+++ ::::::You must have read it somewhere, no? You didn't find it out in a dictionary.. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 03:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

525019 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525019 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-02 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.143992580E09 +++$+++ I relaise of course that the two subjects aren't the same  (as I hope the merged article indicated), but as they're related it's surely better to have one decent article than two very short ones that are unlikely to be expanded?  Redirects ensure that readers find what they're looking for. -- +++$+++ I relaise of course that the two subjects aren't the same  (as I hope the merged article indicated), but as they're related it's surely better to have one decent article than two very short ones that are unlikely to be expanded?  Redirects ensure that readers find what they're looking for. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 08:43, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
525020 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525019 +++$+++ 525019 +++$+++ 2006-04-02 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.144007880E09 +++$+++ Responded at [[Talk:Wood's lamp]]. -- +++$+++ :Responded at [[Talk:Wood's lamp]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 12:58, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
525021 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525019 +++$+++ 525019 +++$+++ 2006-04-13 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.144953660E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much! -- +++$+++ :Thank you so much! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 11:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

262878 +++$+++ Stilldoggy +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-02 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.207122840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the vote of confidence. :=( I will just leave wikipedia if that is how my work is viewed. Please see this page for further discussion. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Fvasconcellos#Socks_and_benzos]-- +++$+++ Thanks for the vote of confidence. :=( I will just leave wikipedia if that is how my work is viewed. Please see this page for further discussion. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fvasconcellos#Socks_and_benzos]--[[User:Stilldoggy|Stilldoggy]] ([[User talk:Stilldoggy|talk]]) 00:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
262879 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262878 +++$+++ 262878 +++$+++ 2008-04-02 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.207124520E09 +++$+++ Sorry I've not been of much help lately, guys.  Two factors:  my disillusionment with the Med Project of some months back, and my new duties=time constraints.  Please let me know if\/where I can help.   +++$+++ :Sorry I've not been of much help lately, guys.  Two factors:  my disillusionment with the Med Project of some months back, and my new duties=time constraints.  Please let me know if/where I can help.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

525024 +++$+++ Kyle sb +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-13 07:22:00 +++$+++ 1.144938120E09 +++$+++ Hey I just went to any administrator in the list.  But after reverting a vandalism edit from [[User:Puddlepants]] ([[User_talk:Puddlepants]]), I noticed looking through their contributions [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Puddlepants here]. They have been nothing but vandalism, in fact not one of those edits appears to be useful. I was wondering if this user is blocked, or should be, he (or she) has hardly even been warned for the damage caused. Just hoped to help.  +++$+++ Hey I just went to any administrator in the list.  But after reverting a vandalism edit from [[User:Puddlepants]] ([[User_talk:Puddlepants]]), I noticed looking through their contributions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Puddlepants here]. They have been nothing but vandalism, in fact not one of those edits appears to be useful. I was wondering if this user is blocked, or should be, he (or she) has hardly even been warned for the damage caused. Just hoped to help. [[User:Kyle sb|Kyle sb]] 07:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
525025 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525024 +++$+++ 525024 +++$+++ 2006-04-13 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.144953660E09 +++$+++ You are correct -- Puddlepants is a vandal, but a slow one (no edits in the last 48 hours, and very few edits before then.) I tend to be very conservative with blocks, reserving them for cases where a user has ignored several warnings, and is moving quickly. So for now I've just put another warning on his page. -- +++$+++ :You are correct -- Puddlepants is a vandal, but a slow one (no edits in the last 48 hours, and very few edits before then.) I tend to be very conservative with blocks, reserving them for cases where a user has ignored several warnings, and is moving quickly. So for now I've just put another warning on his page. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 11:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

737 +++$+++ Kjoonlee +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.163850600E09 +++$+++ But that's been deleted. ''In many other cases, the basic vocabulary of various dialects appears to be cognate to words found also in Standard Korean, but with highly divergent phonological form'' this still remains, and this needs to be cited. --''' +++$+++ But that's been deleted. ''In many other cases, the basic vocabulary of various dialects appears to be cognate to words found also in Standard Korean, but with highly divergent phonological form'' this still remains, and this needs to be cited. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 03:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
738 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 737 +++$+++ 737 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.163851080E09 +++$+++ You are really ridiculous. I've got to go see what you've put in its place.  +++$+++ :You are really ridiculous. I've got to go see what you've put in its place. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 03:58, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
739 +++$+++ Kjoonlee +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 737 +++$+++ 738 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.163851200E09 +++$+++ Citing sources is part of the [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] policy and the [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] guideline. There's also the [[Wikipedia:No original research]] policy for excluding previously unpublished material from Wikipedia. If your edits can't be justified to stay, they will be challenged and\/or deleted. --''' +++$+++ ::Citing sources is part of the [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] policy and the [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] guideline. There's also the [[Wikipedia:No original research]] policy for excluding previously unpublished material from Wikipedia. If your edits can't be justified to stay, they will be challenged and/or deleted. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 04:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
740 +++$+++ Kjoonlee +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 737 +++$+++ 739 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.163851200E09 +++$+++ I hope I don't have to remind you about [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]]. --''' +++$+++ :::I hope I don't have to remind you about [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]]. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 04:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

262884 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-03 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.207253820E09 +++$+++ I've got a hate on for long EL sections, so feel free to replace any you think I was too extreme in removing.  If I run into any issues with the remaining links, I'm happy to discuss.  I realize my interpretation of WP:EL is...strict to put it charitably, so I try to be easily convinced if there's reasonable merit.   +++$+++ I've got a hate on for long EL sections, so feel free to replace any you think I was too extreme in removing.  If I run into any issues with the remaining links, I'm happy to discuss.  I realize my interpretation of WP:EL is...strict to put it charitably, so I try to be easily convinced if there's reasonable merit.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] ([[User talk:WLU|talk]]) 13:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
262885 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262884 +++$+++ 262884 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.207553640E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Epilepsy&diff=203874495&oldid=203452714 Huh?  Huh?  Whaddya think]?  You're impressed, I can tell : )  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Epilepsy&diff=203874495&oldid=203452714 Huh?  Huh?  Whaddya think]?  You're impressed, I can tell : ) [[User:WLU|WLU]] ([[User talk:WLU|talk]]) 00:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

742 +++$+++ Wikipeditor +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 742 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.163892720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Wikipeditor|Wikipeditor]] 15:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
743 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 742 +++$+++ 742 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.166249040E09 +++$+++ I have never seen anyone, and I mean ''anyone'', postulate *\/l\/ as the underlying form of the phoneme represented by \u3139 in Korean. Transcribing that ''jamo'' as \"l\" when it occurs in the coda of a syllable is merely a convention of romanization that reflects the allophonic variation expressed in Korean pronunciation.  +++$+++ :I have never seen anyone, and I mean ''anyone'', postulate */l/ as the underlying form of the phoneme represented by ㄹ in Korean. Transcribing that ''jamo'' as "l" when it occurs in the coda of a syllable is merely a convention of romanization that reflects the allophonic variation expressed in Korean pronunciation. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 22:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

87505 +++$+++ Siteskipper +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87505 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-02 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.301813040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Siteskipper|Siteskipper]] ([[User talk:Siteskipper|talk]]) 23:44, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
87506 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87505 +++$+++ 87505 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.301843160E09 +++$+++ I realise this isn't obvious\u2014the [[WP:DAB|guidelines]] and [[MOS:DAB|conventions]] around disambiguation pages are long and complex, but do make sense if you take the time to read them. I did so myself only after [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Isis_(disambiguation)&diff=242224444&oldid=239358481 my addition] to [[Isis (disambiguation)]] was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Isis_(disambiguation)&diff=242240997&oldid=242224444 reverted] (which spurred me into writing [[International Studies of Infarct Survival|a separate short article]]). Regards,  +++$+++ :I realise this isn't obvious—the [[WP:DAB|guidelines]] and [[MOS:DAB|conventions]] around disambiguation pages are long and complex, but do make sense if you take the time to read them. I did so myself only after [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isis_(disambiguation)&diff=242224444&oldid=239358481 my addition] to [[Isis (disambiguation)]] was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isis_(disambiguation)&diff=242240997&oldid=242224444 reverted] (which spurred me into writing [[International Studies of Infarct Survival|a separate short article]]). Regards, [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 08:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

525032 +++$+++ AED +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-28 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.146284640E09 +++$+++ Would you mind taking a look at my note regarding [[Patricia Bath]] under the \"Famous Ophthalmologists\" section in [[Talk:Ophthalmology]]? Thanks! - +++$+++ Would you mind taking a look at my note regarding [[Patricia Bath]] under the "Famous Ophthalmologists" section in [[Talk:Ophthalmology]]? Thanks! -[[User:AED|AED]] 21:24, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
525033 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525032 +++$+++ 525032 +++$+++ 2006-04-30 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.146421140E09 +++$+++ That's a tough one. I'd lean towards a keep, but a more sustainable solution might be to split it off into a new page, [[History of ophthalmology]]. Focus upon the advances rather than the personalities (though giving credit to the people involved), and arrange the achievements chronologically. Then, instead of trying to define some arbitrary criteria for inclusion on an unordered list, you could rely upon general principles of proportion to determine what merited inclusion. -- +++$+++ :That's a tough one. I'd lean towards a keep, but a more sustainable solution might be to split it off into a new page, [[History of ophthalmology]]. Focus upon the advances rather than the personalities (though giving credit to the people involved), and arrange the achievements chronologically. Then, instead of trying to define some arbitrary criteria for inclusion on an unordered list, you could rely upon general principles of proportion to determine what merited inclusion. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 11:19, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

262268 +++$+++ LittleJerry +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-03 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.291435980E09 +++$+++ Hello, I did some improvements to the [[Grevy's zebra]] article. I don't think it's a \"start\" article any more.  +++$+++ Hello, I did some improvements to the [[Grevy's zebra]] article. I don't think it's a "start" article any more. [[User:LittleJerry|LittleJerry]] ([[User talk:LittleJerry|talk]]) 20:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
262269 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262268 +++$+++ 262268 +++$+++ 2010-12-03 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.291436820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note. I have reassessed the article to B-class.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the note. I have reassessed the article to B-class. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 20:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

525034 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-30 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.146383340E09 +++$+++ If you are interested, I edited the article on [[Crigler-Najjar syndrome]] you started, maybe you care to give some feedback? -- +++$+++ If you are interested, I edited the article on [[Crigler-Najjar syndrome]] you started, maybe you care to give some feedback? --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] 00:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
525035 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525034 +++$+++ 525034 +++$+++ 2006-04-30 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.146423540E09 +++$+++ You have done wonderful work, especially for someone so new to Wikipedia. I'd recommend taking a look at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Clinical medicine\/Template for medical conditions]] for ideas on how to structure headings, but overall, you are doing a great job. Probably the most important feedback I'd have is about the references. I tend to only use the \"References\" header when a link ties to a specific assertion in the article, and to otherwise use \"External links\". A good overview of using footnotes is available at [[Wikipedia:Footnotes]]. Thanks again for your hard work. -- +++$+++ :You have done wonderful work, especially for someone so new to Wikipedia. I'd recommend taking a look at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Clinical medicine/Template for medical conditions]] for ideas on how to structure headings, but overall, you are doing a great job. Probably the most important feedback I'd have is about the references. I tend to only use the "References" header when a link ties to a specific assertion in the article, and to otherwise use "External links". A good overview of using footnotes is available at [[Wikipedia:Footnotes]]. Thanks again for your hard work. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 11:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

747 +++$+++ HalfOfElement29 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-20 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.169301540E09 +++$+++ have already warned you to cease such behavior. If you continue such behavior, you may be blocked from editting wikipedia.  +++$+++ have already warned you to cease such behavior. If you continue such behavior, you may be blocked from editting wikipedia. [[User:HalfOfElement29|HalfOfElement29]] 05:59, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
748 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 747 +++$+++ 747 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.169302020E09 +++$+++ It would be more constructive for you to respond to my valid criticisms of your edits to the wiki:[[haplogroup]] page rather than complaining about my disgust for your pretention to be a Wikipedia administrator. Please quit evading the point.  +++$+++ :It would be more constructive for you to respond to my valid criticisms of your edits to the wiki:[[haplogroup]] page rather than complaining about my disgust for your pretention to be a Wikipedia administrator. Please quit evading the point. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 06:07, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

262892 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-15 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.208324820E09 +++$+++ As well, would you mind making the call on [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates\/List of Ohio county name etymologies|this FLRC]]? It's been open 2 months and I nominated it, so I don't want to close it. --  +++$+++ As well, would you mind making the call on [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Ohio county name etymologies|this FLRC]]? It's been open 2 months and I nominated it, so I don't want to close it. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 22:47, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
262893 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262892 +++$+++ 262892 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.208405040E09 +++$+++ You got everything right. A discussion has been started [[Wikipedia:Featured list criteria\/Comprehensive long lists|here]] regarding a potential change to 1b (comprehensiveness) and expanding it to say something along the lines of \"A list is deemed comprehensive if it includes all notable items from a topic, or establishes a set agreed upon criteria and includes a hat-note that points to a relevant Category.\" and I'll notify most of the participants in the Arsenal FLRC. --  +++$+++ :You got everything right. A discussion has been started [[Wikipedia:Featured list criteria/Comprehensive long lists|here]] regarding a potential change to 1b (comprehensiveness) and expanding it to say something along the lines of "A list is deemed comprehensive if it includes all notable items from a topic, or establishes a set agreed upon criteria and includes a hat-note that points to a relevant Category." and I'll notify most of the participants in the Arsenal FLRC. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 21:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

525038 +++$+++ Kusma +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-20 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.148185500E09 +++$+++ You turned this into a redirect to a nonexistent page. Instead of deleting it, I have reverted to the version with content. I wanted to ask you first what purpose this page serves and whether this page should be deleted. Please answer on my talk page. Thank you,  +++$+++ You turned this into a redirect to a nonexistent page. Instead of deleting it, I have reverted to the version with content. I wanted to ask you first what purpose this page serves and whether this page should be deleted. Please answer on my talk page. Thank you, [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 21:25, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
525039 +++$+++ Kusma +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525038 +++$+++ 525038 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.148188680E09 +++$+++ Somebody deleted the page anyway; if you need it back, I can undelete it for you or move it to your userspace.  +++$+++ :Somebody deleted the page anyway; if you need it back, I can undelete it for you or move it to your userspace. [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 22:18, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
525040 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525038 +++$+++ 525038 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.148190120E09 +++$+++ That was an error on my part, and I have no objection to its deletion. -- +++$+++ :That was an error on my part, and I have no objection to its deletion. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
525041 +++$+++ Kusma +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525038 +++$+++ 525040 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.148190240E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to make sure :-)  +++$+++ ::Just wanted to make sure :-) [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 22:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

262895 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-08 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.207723860E09 +++$+++ Good gosh, I checked your contribs so I could find the diet article you've been working on, and instead, I stumbled in to that utter silliness at [[Talk:Rotavirus]].  Ugh.  Maybe Nygaard woke up on the wrong side of the bed or something, because just before that, he was complaining about [[WT:FAC]].  Goodness, Graham doesn't deserve the treatment he's gotten on Wiki.  Anyway, I'm really here to say you should ask [[User:Brighterorange]] to run his dash fixing script on the diet; it will fix all the page range dashes in the citations.   +++$+++ Good gosh, I checked your contribs so I could find the diet article you've been working on, and instead, I stumbled in to that utter silliness at [[Talk:Rotavirus]].  Ugh.  Maybe Nygaard woke up on the wrong side of the bed or something, because just before that, he was complaining about [[WT:FAC]].  Goodness, Graham doesn't deserve the treatment he's gotten on Wiki.  Anyway, I'm really here to say you should ask [[User:Brighterorange]] to run his dash fixing script on the diet; it will fix all the page range dashes in the citations.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
262896 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262895 +++$+++ 262895 +++$+++ 2008-04-09 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.207724580E09 +++$+++ Also, I wasn't sure about [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style#Spacing_on_units_of_measurement|this]].   +++$+++ :Also, I wasn't sure about [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style#Spacing_on_units_of_measurement|this]].  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

752 +++$+++ Cydevil +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.169558340E09 +++$+++ I also took the liberty of quoting your rebuttal in the [[Han Chinese|Han Chinese]] article to argue against the same claim made in [[Koreans|Koreans]].  +++$+++ I also took the liberty of quoting your rebuttal in the [[Han Chinese|Han Chinese]] article to argue against the same claim made in [[Koreans|Koreans]]. [[User:Cydevil|Cydevil]] 05:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
753 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.169559900E09 +++$+++ I think you are right on the mark. I originally wrote that paragraph to reflect several genetics papers that had recently been published on the subject, several of which (mostly written by Chinese authors, as I recall) claimed that the appearance of various closely related haplotypes within the O3-M122 clade indicated a recent Neolithic expansion from the Central Plain of China. It was in vogue among population geneticists a few years back to assume very recent \"Neolithic\" origins for many of these widely dispersed haplogroups, and Haplogroup O3-M122 was one of those that they just loved to claim proved a recent Chinese origin of most East Asian ethnicities. The material I have read more recently has debunked most of those claims, however, and it now seems more likely that Haplogroup O3-M122 has an ancient Paleolithic origin somewhere in East Eurasia, while only O3a5 might be closely connected with recent Chinese expansions. Haplogroup O3* is, for example, one of the haplogroups that has frequently been associated with the Austronesian expansion into Polynesia, and I don't think many people would claim that the Austronesian expansion was effected by \"Han Chinese.\" I had been wavering on whether to rewrite that paragraph in order to reflect these recent discoveries and changes in interpretation of the spread of the less-derived, \"backbone\" haplogroups (i.e., they are now generally believed to be very ancient genetic markers of Paleolithic origin, affected by genetic drift and subsequent diversification among descendant populations), but I think I will go ahead and change that paragraph now in order to quash the growth of any overly ambitious theories on the behalf of our Chinese colleagues.  +++$+++ :I think you are right on the mark. I originally wrote that paragraph to reflect several genetics papers that had recently been published on the subject, several of which (mostly written by Chinese authors, as I recall) claimed that the appearance of various closely related haplotypes within the O3-M122 clade indicated a recent Neolithic expansion from the Central Plain of China. It was in vogue among population geneticists a few years back to assume very recent "Neolithic" origins for many of these widely dispersed haplogroups, and Haplogroup O3-M122 was one of those that they just loved to claim proved a recent Chinese origin of most East Asian ethnicities. The material I have read more recently has debunked most of those claims, however, and it now seems more likely that Haplogroup O3-M122 has an ancient Paleolithic origin somewhere in East Eurasia, while only O3a5 might be closely connected with recent Chinese expansions. Haplogroup O3* is, for example, one of the haplogroups that has frequently been associated with the Austronesian expansion into Polynesia, and I don't think many people would claim that the Austronesian expansion was effected by "Han Chinese." I had been wavering on whether to rewrite that paragraph in order to reflect these recent discoveries and changes in interpretation of the spread of the less-derived, "backbone" haplogroups (i.e., they are now generally believed to be very ancient genetic markers of Paleolithic origin, affected by genetic drift and subsequent diversification among descendant populations), but I think I will go ahead and change that paragraph now in order to quash the growth of any overly ambitious theories on the behalf of our Chinese colleagues. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 05:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
754 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.169560320E09 +++$+++ Oh, I'm sorry. I should have read your comments more carefully before responding. I mistakenly thought that you were exhorting me to change the Haplogroup O3 wiki because you thought I had contributed to the misconception that this was the \"Chinese haplogroup.\" It is true that Haplogroup O3 is the most frequently occurring haplogroup among modern Han Chinese populations (as well as among Hmong-Mien and most Sino-Tibetan minority groups), but, as you mentioned, it now seems clear that not all (or even most) of Haplogroup O3 can be attributed to recent Chinese influence. I do agree that we should edit the Haplogroup O3 wiki page to reflect this.  +++$+++ :Oh, I'm sorry. I should have read your comments more carefully before responding. I mistakenly thought that you were exhorting me to change the Haplogroup O3 wiki because you thought I had contributed to the misconception that this was the "Chinese haplogroup." It is true that Haplogroup O3 is the most frequently occurring haplogroup among modern Han Chinese populations (as well as among Hmong-Mien and most Sino-Tibetan minority groups), but, as you mentioned, it now seems clear that not all (or even most) of Haplogroup O3 can be attributed to recent Chinese influence. I do agree that we should edit the Haplogroup O3 wiki page to reflect this. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 05:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
755 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.169572740E09 +++$+++ Actually, I find it sort of amusing that ''National Geographic'''s website for the Genographic Project is still espousing the view that Haplogroup O3 is a very recent haplogroup that spread throughout East Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific as a result of Neolithic expansions originating in the region of China and associated with the dispersal of rice agriculture. They make no mention of millet agriculture, for example; they choose to popularize the view that Haplogroup O3-M122 is exclusively \"Chinese\" (Han or otherwise) in origin and intimately associated with the spread of rice agriculture. So, let us keep in mind that even such heavy hitters as ''National Geographic'' and the Genographic Project can be fallible, and everyone has his own biases and motives.  +++$+++ :Actually, I find it sort of amusing that ''National Geographic'''s website for the Genographic Project is still espousing the view that Haplogroup O3 is a very recent haplogroup that spread throughout East Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific as a result of Neolithic expansions originating in the region of China and associated with the dispersal of rice agriculture. They make no mention of millet agriculture, for example; they choose to popularize the view that Haplogroup O3-M122 is exclusively "Chinese" (Han or otherwise) in origin and intimately associated with the spread of rice agriculture. So, let us keep in mind that even such heavy hitters as ''National Geographic'' and the Genographic Project can be fallible, and everyone has his own biases and motives. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 09:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
756 +++$+++ Cydevil +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 755 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.169625900E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your efforts. Genetic anthropology is a nascent field of studies where new progress and changes are made every year. It's amazing how theories in genetic anthrpology can be so radically upturned by contrary evidence from new samples and studies. And unfortunately, various sources cannot remain up-to-date. I think National Geographics is a good example. I don't think its fallibility is intentional. They're just not updating the site. I think it's important that at least adaptive sources like Wikipedia should reflect such radical changes in genetic anthropology, as to provide people with a more accurate perspective. Again, thank you for your efforts.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for your efforts. Genetic anthropology is a nascent field of studies where new progress and changes are made every year. It's amazing how theories in genetic anthrpology can be so radically upturned by contrary evidence from new samples and studies. And unfortunately, various sources cannot remain up-to-date. I think National Geographics is a good example. I don't think its fallibility is intentional. They're just not updating the site. I think it's important that at least adaptive sources like Wikipedia should reflect such radical changes in genetic anthropology, as to provide people with a more accurate perspective. Again, thank you for your efforts. [[User:Cydevil|Cydevil]] 00:05, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
757 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 756 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.169651520E09 +++$+++ On a side note, I think it is interesting that the Haplogroup C3* Y-chromosomes found among Koreans appear to belong to a different cluster from those that are found at extremely high frequencies among Mongols, Kazakhs, and Tungus. I'm eagerly anticipating a study that might shed some light on the origin(s) of the Haplogroup C3* element among Koreans; personally, I have a hunch that the Korean C3* element might be related in large part to the modal haplotype of the [[Nivkhs]], because I think that the ancient proto-Koreans absorbed some sort of Nivkh-like population (a lot of Korean people just ''look like'' Nivkhs, and there are many interesting Korean-Nivkh linguistic parallels as well, all of which seem to suggest some sort of Nivkh-related substratum in the Korean language). Another reason for assuming either a recent expansion of C3* among the Koreans or an introduction of C3* into the Korean population from a foreign source (either substratal, e.g. from the proto-Nivkhs, or, less likely, adstratal, e.g. from Mongols or Manchus) is that C3 as a whole is very infrequent among the Japanese and, as far as I know, has not been found at all among samples of Ryukyuans, which suggests that the occurrence of Haplogroup C3 among modern Japanese is probably due mostly to assimilation of either Asian immigrants or Ainus, although the presence of C3a in Japan at a very low frequency suggests that C3 might actually have a long history as a minor haplogroup in Japan. In any case, if there is any truth to the posited proto-historic relationship between (at least a certain segment of) the Japanese and the Koreans, then Haplogroup C3* could not have been a major element among the proto-Korean population of that time, because it is not found among the Ryukyuans and it is only a very minor element in the Japanese population as a whole, whereas it accounts for some one-sixth of the entire Korean population. (Of course, the ratio of C3 in modern Koreans compared to modern Japanese would also make sense if the Japanese were only about 1\/6 to 1\/5 Korean, and the Ryukyuans basically not Korean at all, as that would be sufficient to produce the frequency of C3 that is found among the modern Japanese. In this case, I would guess that Haplogroup N1, which is found among the populations of some cities in Japan, and probably also some O2b1* and O3* in addition to C3* would be attributable to Korean influence. I think the frequencies of those haplogroups among the Japanese would ultimately add up to approximately 1\/5 or 1\/6 of the Japanese Y-chromosome distribution, so this actually might be a good working hypothesis for explaining the presence of C3* among the Japanese but apparent absence from the Ryukyuan population.)  +++$+++ :::On a side note, I think it is interesting that the Haplogroup C3* Y-chromosomes found among Koreans appear to belong to a different cluster from those that are found at extremely high frequencies among Mongols, Kazakhs, and Tungus. I'm eagerly anticipating a study that might shed some light on the origin(s) of the Haplogroup C3* element among Koreans; personally, I have a hunch that the Korean C3* element might be related in large part to the modal haplotype of the [[Nivkhs]], because I think that the ancient proto-Koreans absorbed some sort of Nivkh-like population (a lot of Korean people just ''look like'' Nivkhs, and there are many interesting Korean-Nivkh linguistic parallels as well, all of which seem to suggest some sort of Nivkh-related substratum in the Korean language). Another reason for assuming either a recent expansion of C3* among the Koreans or an introduction of C3* into the Korean population from a foreign source (either substratal, e.g. from the proto-Nivkhs, or, less likely, adstratal, e.g. from Mongols or Manchus) is that C3 as a whole is very infrequent among the Japanese and, as far as I know, has not been found at all among samples of Ryukyuans, which suggests that the occurrence of Haplogroup C3 among modern Japanese is probably due mostly to assimilation of either Asian immigrants or Ainus, although the presence of C3a in Japan at a very low frequency suggests that C3 might actually have a long history as a minor haplogroup in Japan. In any case, if there is any truth to the posited proto-historic relationship between (at least a certain segment of) the Japanese and the Koreans, then Haplogroup C3* could not have been a major element among the proto-Korean population of that time, because it is not found among the Ryukyuans and it is only a very minor element in the Japanese population as a whole, whereas it accounts for some one-sixth of the entire Korean population. (Of course, the ratio of C3 in modern Koreans compared to modern Japanese would also make sense if the Japanese were only about 1/6 to 1/5 Korean, and the Ryukyuans basically not Korean at all, as that would be sufficient to produce the frequency of C3 that is found among the modern Japanese. In this case, I would guess that Haplogroup N1, which is found among the populations of some cities in Japan, and probably also some O2b1* and O3* in addition to C3* would be attributable to Korean influence. I think the frequencies of those haplogroups among the Japanese would ultimately add up to approximately 1/5 or 1/6 of the Japanese Y-chromosome distribution, so this actually might be a good working hypothesis for explaining the presence of C3* among the Japanese but apparent absence from the Ryukyuan population.) [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 07:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
758 +++$+++ Cydevil +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 757 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.169805600E09 +++$+++ I don't know if this could be of any help, but Kim Wook et al recently(Sept. 2006) published a paper focusing on haplogroup C in Korean populations: Jin, H. J., Kwak, K. D., Hong, S. B., Kim, W., 2006. Y-chromosome Haplogroup C Lineages and Implications for Population History of Korea. Korean J. Genetics 28(3): 253-259. I do have access to that particular study and I would like to make it available, but I'm not sure about the copyright rules.  +++$+++ ::::I don't know if this could be of any help, but Kim Wook et al recently(Sept. 2006) published a paper focusing on haplogroup C in Korean populations: Jin, H. J., Kwak, K. D., Hong, S. B., Kim, W., 2006. Y-chromosome Haplogroup C Lineages and Implications for Population History of Korea. Korean J. Genetics 28(3): 253-259. I do have access to that particular study and I would like to make it available, but I'm not sure about the copyright rules. [[User:Cydevil|Cydevil]] 02:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
759 +++$+++ Cydevil +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 758 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.169805600E09 +++$+++ I just checked. The study is available here[http:\/\/kgenetics.or.kr].  +++$+++ :::::I just checked. The study is available here[http://kgenetics.or.kr]. [[User:Cydevil|Cydevil]] 02:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
760 +++$+++ Cydevil +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 757 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.169804520E09 +++$+++ As for Nivkhs, I do recall some Korean linguists claiming that the Korean language consists of an Altaic superstratum and Paleoasian substratum based on comparisons between the Korean language and the Nivkh language. In fact, I made a thread on this +++$+++ ::::As for Nivkhs, I do recall some Korean linguists claiming that the Korean language consists of an Altaic superstratum and Paleoasian substratum based on comparisons between the Korean language and the Nivkh language. In fact, I made a thread on this[[User:Cydevil|Cydevil]] 01:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
761 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 756 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 08:13:00 +++$+++ 1.169655180E09 +++$+++ By the way, some of the Korean C3* Y-chromosomes appear to be very closely related to some C3* Y-chromosomes that have been found among the [[Burusho]] in northern Pakistan. I don't know what a good explanation for this might be. [[Hazaras]]? But they're supposed to be related to the Mongols, not Koreans. Hmm...  +++$+++ :::By the way, some of the Korean C3* Y-chromosomes appear to be very closely related to some C3* Y-chromosomes that have been found among the [[Burusho]] in northern Pakistan. I don't know what a good explanation for this might be. [[Hazaras]]? But they're supposed to be related to the Mongols, not Koreans. Hmm... [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 08:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
762 +++$+++ Cydevil +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 752 +++$+++ 761 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.169804520E09 +++$+++ Northern Pakistan? Well, there is the legend of a [[Heo Hwang-ok|princess]] supposedly from the Indian subcontinent(conjectured by archaeological remains). I guess that's as close as it can get to anyone from that region, as far as I know.  +++$+++ ::::Northern Pakistan? Well, there is the legend of a [[Heo Hwang-ok|princess]] supposedly from the Indian subcontinent(conjectured by archaeological remains). I guess that's as close as it can get to anyone from that region, as far as I know. [[User:Cydevil|Cydevil]] 01:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

262897 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262897 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-17 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.208497380E09 +++$+++ Sorry to load up the text with huge inlines; I knew if I took the time to post it somewhere, well, I wouldn't find the time :-) Let me know when I should have another look; I'm running hot and cold on the Medicine Project again, after the time I put in last night to lend a hand was butchered.   +++$+++ Sorry to load up the text with huge inlines; I knew if I took the time to post it somewhere, well, I wouldn't find the time :-) Let me know when I should have another look; I'm running hot and cold on the Medicine Project again, after the time I put in last night to lend a hand was butchered.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
262898 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262897 +++$+++ 262897 +++$+++ 2008-04-18 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.208584320E09 +++$+++ Colin, the lead is much clearer now.  I know we typically avoid too much definition in the lead, but it was needed here; now I know what I'm reading about early on.  I like it.   +++$+++ :Colin, the lead is much clearer now.  I know we typically avoid too much definition in the lead, but it was needed here; now I know what I'm reading about early on.  I like it.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

525042 +++$+++ GameKeeper +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525042 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-21 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.148271000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:GameKeeper|GameKeeper]] 21:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
525043 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525042 +++$+++ 525042 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.148291160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the catch! I have updated the template. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the catch! I have updated the template. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 02:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

262899 +++$+++ Ragesoss +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262899 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-19 04:20:00 +++$+++ 1.208604000E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the delay; I looked over the history section of the article, and it looks solid to me.  I made a few copyedits, but it's well-written and looks reliably sourced.-- +++$+++ Sorry for the delay; I looked over the history section of the article, and it looks solid to me.  I made a few copyedits, but it's well-written and looks reliably sourced.--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 04:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
262900 +++$+++ Ragesoss +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262899 +++$+++ 262899 +++$+++ 2008-04-19 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.208643960E09 +++$+++ You can delink Conklin if you want.  I linked it because I had heard the name in a different context (in connection with Macfadden and Battle Creek but not the ketogenic diet).  My philosophy is that a few red links never hurt anyone.-- +++$+++ :You can delink Conklin if you want.  I linked it because I had heard the name in a different context (in connection with Macfadden and Battle Creek but not the ketogenic diet).  My philosophy is that a few red links never hurt anyone.--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 15:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
262901 +++$+++ Ragesoss +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262899 +++$+++ 262900 +++$+++ 2008-04-19 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.208658660E09 +++$+++ I actually don't remember.  Maybe it was for the ketogenic diet and I just forgot that part of it.  I thought it was something more general, though, like a fitness regime for everyone.-- +++$+++ ::I actually don't remember.  Maybe it was for the ketogenic diet and I just forgot that part of it.  I thought it was something more general, though, like a fitness regime for everyone.--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 19:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

262270 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-05 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.291553040E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to say that I am sorry if I've been too snarky, grumpy, cynical and generally a poopy puke to be around lately.  While I can probably attribute some of it to darkness at 4:30 pm (you know how it is when you live halfway to the north pole!  LOL!), post-election depression (there's a really good reason I never edit political articles! ;-),  and the ways this particular year has been a bit challenging in general, I'm realizing that I'm even a little bitey at my friends, so mea culpa  if I've been a snot.  Feel free to trout slap me as needed.  I anticipate a better mood once I get my students through finals (why DID I assign all that work?  Now I have to grade it!), myself through the holidays and over the hurdles of some stuff with my non-teaching work.  And in the meantime, my intentions are excellent, my patience, not so much.  :-P  +++$+++ Just wanted to say that I am sorry if I've been too snarky, grumpy, cynical and generally a poopy puke to be around lately.  While I can probably attribute some of it to darkness at 4:30 pm (you know how it is when you live halfway to the north pole!  LOL!), post-election depression (there's a really good reason I never edit political articles! ;-),  and the ways this particular year has been a bit challenging in general, I'm realizing that I'm even a little bitey at my friends, so mea culpa  if I've been a snot.  Feel free to trout slap me as needed.  I anticipate a better mood once I get my students through finals (why DID I assign all that work?  Now I have to grade it!), myself through the holidays and over the hurdles of some stuff with my non-teaching work.  And in the meantime, my intentions are excellent, my patience, not so much.  :-P [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 04:44, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
262271 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ 2010-12-08 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.291798260E09 +++$+++ Sorry, still so snarky.  Still have one nerve left.  Will be so glad to kiss 2010 goodbye.  But at least I DID get my favorite horse a new midweight blankie  [http:\/\/www.sstack.com\/euro-vfree-turnout\/StormShield-VTEK-MARATHON-Original-Turnouts\/]  good for the not-that-cold-but-damp-and-windy stuff we've been having here lately. (WTF is \"patchy valley freezing fog\" anyway? And why do we have zero visibility in a dry climate?  Never mind...)  I guess that's sort of my Xmas present too.  Darn horse has more 'coats' than I do!  But then, she's 30, so she gets anything she wants!  Came in last night, I put it on this morning.  At least ONE of the females around here is happy!   +++$+++ :Sorry, still so snarky.  Still have one nerve left.  Will be so glad to kiss 2010 goodbye.  But at least I DID get my favorite horse a new midweight blankie  [http://www.sstack.com/euro-vfree-turnout/StormShield-VTEK-MARATHON-Original-Turnouts/]  good for the not-that-cold-but-damp-and-windy stuff we've been having here lately. (WTF is "patchy valley freezing fog" anyway? And why do we have zero visibility in a dry climate?  Never mind...)  I guess that's sort of my Xmas present too.  Darn horse has more 'coats' than I do!  But then, she's 30, so she gets anything she wants!  Came in last night, I put it on this morning.  At least ONE of the females around here is happy!  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 00:51, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
262272 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ 262271 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.291734000E09 +++$+++ : I found the photograph at http:\/\/www.barnbuddy.net\/gallery2\/v\/S_B\/cookiefilly\/, dated 02\/28\/08.   +++$+++ *: I found the photograph at http://www.barnbuddy.net/gallery2/v/S_B/cookiefilly/, dated 02/28/08.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 07:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
262273 +++$+++ Ealdgyth +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ 262272 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.291768680E09 +++$+++ This was part of an exhibition, which the book is a book from, but the information given with the page number (p. 51) (All the other information on the bibliographical details is given in the [[Appaloosa]] article's references) says the picture is courtesy of the Print Room, New York Public Library. it appears that it originally appeared in print in the 18th century, which the caption implies but does not give original publication information for.  +++$+++ ::* This was part of an exhibition, which the book is a book from, but the information given with the page number (p. 51) (All the other information on the bibliographical details is given in the [[Appaloosa]] article's references) says the picture is courtesy of the Print Room, New York Public Library. it appears that it originally appeared in print in the 18th century, which the caption implies but does not give original publication information for. [[User:Ealdgyth|Ealdgyth]] - [[User talk:Ealdgyth|Talk]] 16:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
262274 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.294068540E09 +++$+++ Would the New York Public Library be able to provide more information about this image?   +++$+++ ::::* Would the New York Public Library be able to provide more information about this image?  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 07:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
262275 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.294102920E09 +++$+++ Would [[:File:Meulen.jpg]] be an acceptably licensed substitute for this?  +++$+++ :::::* Would [[:File:Meulen.jpg]] be an acceptably licensed substitute for this? [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 17:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
262276 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.294104600E09 +++$+++ Strictly speaking, it should be fine once the source is located, per [[WP:CITE#IMAGE]].   +++$+++ ::::::* Strictly speaking, it should be fine once the source is located, per [[WP:CITE#IMAGE]].  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 17:30, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
262277 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.294194000E09 +++$+++ I've found a source for this, so it should be good to go.  +++$+++ :::::::*I've found a source for this, so it should be good to go. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 18:20, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
262278 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ 262273 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.292084880E09 +++$+++ One good news is that ''Appaloosa: The Spotted Horse in Art and History'' was copyrighted in 1963 but never renewed its rights.  Hence the book is in the public domain.  I would presume that Hinmes is the photographer or his or her heir or spouse; so her courtesy might constitute publication (thus making the photograph a 1963 publication and in the public domain as well).  The circus photograph might be of concern since it is not certain if the library acquired the rights properly.   +++$+++ :::: One good news is that ''Appaloosa: The Spotted Horse in Art and History'' was copyrighted in 1963 but never renewed its rights.  Hence the book is in the public domain.  I would presume that Hinmes is the photographer or his or her heir or spouse; so her courtesy might constitute publication (thus making the photograph a 1963 publication and in the public domain as well).  The circus photograph might be of concern since it is not certain if the library acquired the rights properly.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 08:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
262279 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ 262278 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.294068540E09 +++$+++ It would be best to contact Hinmes and Hertzberg to ascertain if they are the copyright holders and if those images were published previously.  If they are not the copyright holders, then information about the copyright holder would be needed to further determine the status of those images.   +++$+++ ::::: It would be best to contact Hinmes and Hertzberg to ascertain if they are the copyright holders and if those images were published previously.  If they are not the copyright holders, then information about the copyright holder would be needed to further determine the status of those images.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 07:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
262280 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ 262279 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.294790940E09 +++$+++ I finally got around to sending an e-mail to the curator of collections at the Museum where the Hertzberg collection is currently located. I can't find any contact information for Hinmes though, so it looks like we will probably have to replace this.  +++$+++ :::::: I finally got around to sending an e-mail to the curator of collections at the Museum where the Hertzberg collection is currently located. I can't find any contact information for Hinmes though, so it looks like we will probably have to replace this. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 16:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
262281 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.294993080E09 +++$+++ The one of the two men with the Appy was also used as an illustration in the Montana Historical Society article I used as a source on Nez Perce history.  I'll try to see if I can find copyright info on that article.  I can go either way on the circus photo, but I'd really like to try and keep this one.   +++$+++ :::::::::The one of the two men with the Appy was also used as an illustration in the Montana Historical Society article I used as a source on Nez Perce history.  I'll try to see if I can find copyright info on that article.  I can go either way on the circus photo, but I'd really like to try and keep this one.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 00:18, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
262282 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ 262278 +++$+++ 2010-12-09 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.291891500E09 +++$+++ I believe it would be hard to find such commentary for the license plate.  As I see it, the image is currently used as you say to illustrate that Idaho has, due to tradition, chosen the horse as a design option for customized license plates.  This is my personal opinion, though; matters involving [[WP:NFCC]] tend to be subjective but I think unless there is something in the article that comments on the artwork of the plate, objections could be faced over the use of the photograph.   +++$+++ ::::* I believe it would be hard to find such commentary for the license plate.  As I see it, the image is currently used as you say to illustrate that Idaho has, due to tradition, chosen the horse as a design option for customized license plates.  This is my personal opinion, though; matters involving [[WP:NFCC]] tend to be subjective but I think unless there is something in the article that comments on the artwork of the plate, objections could be faced over the use of the photograph.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 02:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
262283 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262270 +++$+++ 262280 +++$+++ 2010-12-09 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.291964400E09 +++$+++ Hmm.  I'll give this some thought and review the provisions of NFCC.  I kind of prefer a \"proceed until apprehended\" approach to this, but I don't want to stir up unneeded drama once this goes to FA, either.   +++$+++ :::::::Hmm.  I'll give this some thought and review the provisions of NFCC.  I kind of prefer a "proceed until apprehended" approach to this, but I don't want to stir up unneeded drama once this goes to FA, either.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 23:00, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

262902 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-23 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.209016860E09 +++$+++ Why haven't you submitted the diet to GA?  And when are you going for FAC?   +++$+++ Why haven't you submitted the diet to GA?  And when are you going for FAC?  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
262903 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262902 +++$+++ 262902 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.209167880E09 +++$+++ I haven't addressed all your and Graham's concerns, and I intend to. I've still more material to read and consider for inclusion, plus I want to take some better pictures.  I thought that once I'm happy with its comprehensiveness, I'd go for peer review (with adverts). I also plan to ask one or two of our literary writers to look over the prose -- but don't want to polish too early. I might even try to get an expert review. So much to do and so little time. FAC is a wee while away yet.  +++$+++ :I haven't addressed all your and Graham's concerns, and I intend to. I've still more material to read and consider for inclusion, plus I want to take some better pictures.  I thought that once I'm happy with its comprehensiveness, I'd go for peer review (with adverts). I also plan to ask one or two of our literary writers to look over the prose -- but don't want to polish too early. I might even try to get an expert review. So much to do and so little time. FAC is a wee while away yet. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

525048 +++$+++ AED +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-07 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.149742860E09 +++$+++ Hi, Arcadian. I was wondering if you might put [[Tonometry]] on your watchlist for a short time. In short, 1) [[User:^DevelopAll]] recently added an external link for, and information about, a particular kind of tonometer (a Diaton transpalpebral tonometer whose webpage notes, \"Powered by ^DevelopAll\"), 2) another contributer added some information regarding the drawbacks about the instrument, 3) I reworded and formatted both contributions to fit Wiki guidelines on verifiability and NPOV, and 4) [[User:^DevelopAll]] has removed the \"negative\" information three times without comment. I suspect that [[User:^DevelopAll]] and [[User:69.22.199.91]] might be one and the same in that [[User:69.22.199.91]] has attempted to reinsert the linkspam that is \"\"Powered by ^DevelopAll\". Thanks! - +++$+++ Hi, Arcadian. I was wondering if you might put [[Tonometry]] on your watchlist for a short time. In short, 1) [[User:^DevelopAll]] recently added an external link for, and information about, a particular kind of tonometer (a Diaton transpalpebral tonometer whose webpage notes, "Powered by ^DevelopAll"), 2) another contributer added some information regarding the drawbacks about the instrument, 3) I reworded and formatted both contributions to fit Wiki guidelines on verifiability and NPOV, and 4) [[User:^DevelopAll]] has removed the "negative" information three times without comment. I suspect that [[User:^DevelopAll]] and [[User:69.22.199.91]] might be one and the same in that [[User:69.22.199.91]] has attempted to reinsert the linkspam that is ""Powered by ^DevelopAll". Thanks! -[[User:AED|AED]] 22:01, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
525049 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525048 +++$+++ 525048 +++$+++ 2006-06-09 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.149846840E09 +++$+++ I've added it to my watchlist. -- +++$+++ :I've added it to my watchlist. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 02:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

262906 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-21 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.208764560E09 +++$+++ Will be lists, temp work at [[Wikipedia:FCDW\/April 28, 2008]], Woody and Scorpion, in case you want to peek in.  I usually ask Tony to run through before publication. Other dispatches at {{t1|FCDW}}.  +++$+++ Will be lists, temp work at [[Wikipedia:FCDW/April 28, 2008]], Woody and Scorpion, in case you want to peek in.  I usually ask Tony to run through before publication. Other dispatches at {{t1|FCDW}}. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
262907 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262906 +++$+++ 262906 +++$+++ 2008-04-21 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.208836080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the input. Like Woody said, all we have are just a bunch of notes in prose form. Feel free to make any changes you like to the article (including the stuff you wrote on my talk page) and we'll credit you as a co-author. --  +++$+++ :Thanks for the input. Like Woody said, all we have are just a bunch of notes in prose form. Feel free to make any changes you like to the article (including the stuff you wrote on my talk page) and we'll credit you as a co-author. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 20:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

763 +++$+++ Cydevil +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.172481840E09 +++$+++ I think I came across one of your posts on a Korean forum(a news article to be more exact) regarding southern origins theory of Koreans. I must say, your proficiency in Korean is very impressive.  +++$+++ I think I came across one of your posts on a Korean forum(a news article to be more exact) regarding southern origins theory of Koreans. I must say, your proficiency in Korean is very impressive. [[User:Cydevil|Cydevil]] 01:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
764 +++$+++ Cydevil +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 763 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.172697780E09 +++$+++ Don't be so modest! Your Korean is very good, and I know how hard Korean can be for none-native speakers.  +++$+++ ::Don't be so modest! Your Korean is very good, and I know how hard Korean can be for none-native speakers. [[User:Cydevil|Cydevil]] 13:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
765 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 763 +++$+++ 763 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.172643480E09 +++$+++ By the way, I did read that recent report by the Korean geneticists at http:\/\/kgenetics.or.kr. Thank you for the link. Their report seemed to confirm what I had heard previously; namely, that the diversity of Haplogroup C3* is actually greatest in the populations located around the Sea of Japan, particularly on the continental side, in Korea and Outer Manchuria. I think that this region might have been populated by peoples carrying Haplogroup Q* and Haplogroup C3* in Paleolithic times; this meta-population was probably descended from the Asian relatives of the people who had crossed over into the Americas over 10,000 years ago to become the ancestors of the Amerindians. I am currently hypothesizing that the Haplogroup Q component eventually dominated in the American descendants of this prehistoric \"race,\" while the Haplogroup C3 component ended up dominating in the East Siberian descendants. I think that the Na-Dene peoples, the Eskimo-Aleuts, and the Yeniseian peoples (Kets, etc.) are all the result of later migrations of the Asian descendants of this \"Americanoid Asian\" population, with the Na-Dene and Eskimo-Aleuts following their Amerindian predecessors into the American continent, and the Yeniseians accompanying the Altaics (and perhaps some Uralics, such as the Samoyeds) westward into central-western Siberia. I also believe that the Japanese are essentially a remnant branch of these ancient proto-Americanoids; they generally look much more similar to Amerinds than to mainland Asians in my eyes. The idea that the Koreans have a \"southern\" (e.g. Chinese) origin rather than a \"northern\" or \"western\" (e.g. Siberian) one, though, seems probably correct to me. I know the archaeologists would contest this, but frankly, I believe that archaeology can only provide evidence of cultural similarities and differences; it cannot be used to determine whether the similarities or differences were due to genetic origins or to cultural interactions, and I would claim that it also cannot confidently be used to determine the directionality of influence. It seems just as likely to me that the similarities in archaeological finds between certain parts of Siberia and ancient Manchuria\/Liaoning\/North Korea could be due to a migration ''from'' Manchuria\/Korea ''to'' Siberia rather than the other way around. Population density should be taken seriously in these considerations; I believe that it is more likely for genes from high-density populations (such as those of Korea or China) to flow into low-density populations (such as those of Siberia) rather than the reverse. In any case, the fact remains that two of the major Y-chromosome haplogroups found among the modern Korean population, O2b1* and C3*, have their greatest diversity precisely in the Korean population and not elsewhere; although O3* and O2b* might have entered Korea from somewhere in China in prehistoric times, interacting with the Paleolithic C3* and Q* carriers, the presence of C3* in other populations of northeastern Asia and Central Asia seems more likely to reflect ancient migrations originating from the region of Manchuria\/North Korea, perhaps resulting in the dispersal of the \"Altaic\" languages (which I think might be more accurately termed \"Manchurian\" or \"North Korean\" languages). Haplogroup O2b1* probably developed in isolation in the southern parts of the Korean Peninsula for a very long time, or perhaps the population that carried it was even in contact with Jomon-era populations of Kyushu.  +++$+++ :By the way, I did read that recent report by the Korean geneticists at http://kgenetics.or.kr. Thank you for the link. Their report seemed to confirm what I had heard previously; namely, that the diversity of Haplogroup C3* is actually greatest in the populations located around the Sea of Japan, particularly on the continental side, in Korea and Outer Manchuria. I think that this region might have been populated by peoples carrying Haplogroup Q* and Haplogroup C3* in Paleolithic times; this meta-population was probably descended from the Asian relatives of the people who had crossed over into the Americas over 10,000 years ago to become the ancestors of the Amerindians. I am currently hypothesizing that the Haplogroup Q component eventually dominated in the American descendants of this prehistoric "race," while the Haplogroup C3 component ended up dominating in the East Siberian descendants. I think that the Na-Dene peoples, the Eskimo-Aleuts, and the Yeniseian peoples (Kets, etc.) are all the result of later migrations of the Asian descendants of this "Americanoid Asian" population, with the Na-Dene and Eskimo-Aleuts following their Amerindian predecessors into the American continent, and the Yeniseians accompanying the Altaics (and perhaps some Uralics, such as the Samoyeds) westward into central-western Siberia. I also believe that the Japanese are essentially a remnant branch of these ancient proto-Americanoids; they generally look much more similar to Amerinds than to mainland Asians in my eyes. The idea that the Koreans have a "southern" (e.g. Chinese) origin rather than a "northern" or "western" (e.g. Siberian) one, though, seems probably correct to me. I know the archaeologists would contest this, but frankly, I believe that archaeology can only provide evidence of cultural similarities and differences; it cannot be used to determine whether the similarities or differences were due to genetic origins or to cultural interactions, and I would claim that it also cannot confidently be used to determine the directionality of influence. It seems just as likely to me that the similarities in archaeological finds between certain parts of Siberia and ancient Manchuria/Liaoning/North Korea could be due to a migration ''from'' Manchuria/Korea ''to'' Siberia rather than the other way around. Population density should be taken seriously in these considerations; I believe that it is more likely for genes from high-density populations (such as those of Korea or China) to flow into low-density populations (such as those of Siberia) rather than the reverse. In any case, the fact remains that two of the major Y-chromosome haplogroups found among the modern Korean population, O2b1* and C3*, have their greatest diversity precisely in the Korean population and not elsewhere; although O3* and O2b* might have entered Korea from somewhere in China in prehistoric times, interacting with the Paleolithic C3* and Q* carriers, the presence of C3* in other populations of northeastern Asia and Central Asia seems more likely to reflect ancient migrations originating from the region of Manchuria/North Korea, perhaps resulting in the dispersal of the "Altaic" languages (which I think might be more accurately termed "Manchurian" or "North Korean" languages). Haplogroup O2b1* probably developed in isolation in the southern parts of the Korean Peninsula for a very long time, or perhaps the population that carried it was even in contact with Jomon-era populations of Kyushu. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 22:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
766 +++$+++ Cydevil +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 763 +++$+++ 765 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.172697780E09 +++$+++ Hmm.. I think that would depend on what you really mean by \"southern\" and \"China\", considering that China's a pretty huge place. If you mean the Yellow Sea region, especially western Manchuria\/Hebei, then your claim may not necessarily conflict with archaeological findings. However, further below you go, much less likely. Anyways, the mainstream theory of Korean origin among Korean scholars, as written on a Korean college level history textbook, is that [[Mumun pottery period|new migrants]] exterminated [[Jeulmun pottery period|indigenous populations]] of the Korean peninsula and became the ancestors of modern Koreans. This is due to major changes in subsistence patterns(aquatic resources -> agriculture). However, according to the book, a new theory contrary to the mainstream one has been gaining acceptance recently. The new theory is that changes in subsistence patterns may not necessarily mean changes in its consituents, so the people of [[Jeulmun pottery period]], who are perhaps related to those of [[Hongshan culture]], may have culturally evolved to [[Mumun pottery period]]. Unfortunately, with China claiming that [[Hongshan culture]] is a \"Chinese\" civilization[http:\/\/rogerblench.info\/Language%20data\/China\/Geneva%20paper%202004%20submit.pdf], I believe this will only lead to further controversy.  +++$+++ ::Hmm.. I think that would depend on what you really mean by "southern" and "China", considering that China's a pretty huge place. If you mean the Yellow Sea region, especially western Manchuria/Hebei, then your claim may not necessarily conflict with archaeological findings. However, further below you go, much less likely. Anyways, the mainstream theory of Korean origin among Korean scholars, as written on a Korean college level history textbook, is that [[Mumun pottery period|new migrants]] exterminated [[Jeulmun pottery period|indigenous populations]] of the Korean peninsula and became the ancestors of modern Koreans. This is due to major changes in subsistence patterns(aquatic resources -> agriculture). However, according to the book, a new theory contrary to the mainstream one has been gaining acceptance recently. The new theory is that changes in subsistence patterns may not necessarily mean changes in its consituents, so the people of [[Jeulmun pottery period]], who are perhaps related to those of [[Hongshan culture]], may have culturally evolved to [[Mumun pottery period]]. Unfortunately, with China claiming that [[Hongshan culture]] is a "Chinese" civilization[http://rogerblench.info/Language%20data/China/Geneva%20paper%202004%20submit.pdf], I believe this will only lead to further controversy. [[User:Cydevil|Cydevil]] 13:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
767 +++$+++ Cydevil +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 763 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.173975540E09 +++$+++ Hmm... I've never heard of any pig-worshipping in Korea. Though there's a very old tradition of building poles with bird scultures on top. Most of them are ducks, but there are also ravens, sea gulls, etc.  +++$+++ ::::Hmm... I've never heard of any pig-worshipping in Korea. Though there's a very old tradition of building poles with bird scultures on top. Most of them are ducks, but there are also ravens, sea gulls, etc. [[User:Cydevil|Cydevil]] 09:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
768 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 763 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.173982500E09 +++$+++ Oh, yes, the Korean duck totems. Isn't there some ethnic group in Southeast Asia that makes a big deal about their ancestor who was a bird? As for the Hongshan culture and its pig dragons, it might just be that the association of boars\/swine with dangerous magical power died out or was transferred to the reptilian concept of \"dragon\" after contact with the incipient Chinese ethnic group and their culture.  +++$+++ :::::Oh, yes, the Korean duck totems. Isn't there some ethnic group in Southeast Asia that makes a big deal about their ancestor who was a bird? As for the Hongshan culture and its pig dragons, it might just be that the association of boars/swine with dangerous magical power died out or was transferred to the reptilian concept of "dragon" after contact with the incipient Chinese ethnic group and their culture. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 11:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
769 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 763 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.173983400E09 +++$+++ Now that I think of it, aren't the [[Tuvans]] also known as Uryankhai? And I have heard that the [[Yakuts|Sakha]] were also called Uranghai at some time in the past. These ethnonyms are obviously cognate with Korean \uc624\ub791\uce90 ''orangkhae'', and they all vaguely resemble the Korean word for \"duck\" (Middle Korean \uc62c\ud788 ''olhi'', Modern Korean \uc624\ub9ac ''\u014dri''). What do you think about this? Is it just a coincidence? I would like to hear any theories about the etymology of the Uryankhai\/Uranghai\/Orangkhae ethnonym.  +++$+++ :::::Now that I think of it, aren't the [[Tuvans]] also known as Uryankhai? And I have heard that the [[Yakuts|Sakha]] were also called Uranghai at some time in the past. These ethnonyms are obviously cognate with Korean 오랑캐 ''orangkhae'', and they all vaguely resemble the Korean word for "duck" (Middle Korean 올히 ''olhi'', Modern Korean 오리 ''ōri''). What do you think about this? Is it just a coincidence? I would like to hear any theories about the etymology of the Uryankhai/Uranghai/Orangkhae ethnonym. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 11:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
770 +++$+++ Cydevil +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 763 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.173975540E09 +++$+++ Well, a lot of Koreans would agree, but unfortunately, some people go the extra step to claim Dongyi as something \"Korean\" and claim that Shang Dynasty was \"Korean\".  +++$+++ ::::Well, a lot of Koreans would agree, but unfortunately, some people go the extra step to claim Dongyi as something "Korean" and claim that Shang Dynasty was "Korean". [[User:Cydevil|Cydevil]] 09:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

262908 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-24 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.209031380E09 +++$+++ I've done a bit of clean up (it's still a tad rough) and merged the text you suggested on my talk page (I also added your name to the authors, remove it if you want). As well, there has been a little bit of talk at [[WT:FLC]] about getting a director. I have no interest in the position, I just close lists because I like doing it. I don't suppose you would be interested? --  +++$+++ I've done a bit of clean up (it's still a tad rough) and merged the text you suggested on my talk page (I also added your name to the authors, remove it if you want). As well, there has been a little bit of talk at [[WT:FLC]] about getting a director. I have no interest in the position, I just close lists because I like doing it. I don't suppose you would be interested? -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 03:03, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
262909 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262908 +++$+++ 262908 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.209083340E09 +++$+++ Nah, I agree with you. Basically all I did last night was but your text in there and leave the intro. And I agree that we should mention the potential search for a director. --  +++$+++ :Nah, I agree with you. Basically all I did last night was but your text in there and leave the intro. And I agree that we should mention the potential search for a director. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 17:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
262910 +++$+++ Woody +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262908 +++$+++ 262908 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.209081780E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates#User:Colin]].  +++$+++ :See [[Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates#User:Colin]]. [[User:Woody|Woody]] ([[User talk:Woody|talk]]) 17:03, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
262911 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262908 +++$+++ 262908 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.209101640E09 +++$+++ It's a bit of everything really. Being a director is a commitment, but before I was just doing it for fun and could quit any time. I really didn't want to get tied into any position. However, I have decided to give it a try, so we'll see how it goes. It's a shame you've decided not to run, I think you and Rambling Man would have made a great pair. --  +++$+++ :It's a bit of everything really. Being a director is a commitment, but before I was just doing it for fun and could quit any time. I really didn't want to get tied into any position. However, I have decided to give it a try, so we'll see how it goes. It's a shame you've decided not to run, I think you and Rambling Man would have made a great pair. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 22:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

584871 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584871 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-14 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.203059100E09 +++$+++ On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, <span style=\"font-family: verdana;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 23:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
584872 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584871 +++$+++ 584871 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.203059160E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ :Thank you. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 23:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

525056 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-20 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.150861680E09 +++$+++ Wouldn't it be better for the article name to be [[diamine]] rather than [[diamines]]? That way, one could refer to <nowiki> a [[diamine]], or to multiple [[diamine]]s<\/nowiki>. You see?  +++$+++ Wouldn't it be better for the article name to be [[diamine]] rather than [[diamines]]? That way, one could refer to <nowiki> a [[diamine]], or to multiple [[diamine]]s</nowiki>. You see? [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 20:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
525057 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525056 +++$+++ 525056 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.150861920E09 +++$+++ There is a close distinction there -- \"diamine\" by itself refers to a specific molecule, while \"diamines\" is refering to a family of molecules. But if want to reword the article or rename it, I won't object. -- +++$+++ :There is a close distinction there -- "diamine" by itself refers to a specific molecule, while "diamines" is refering to a family of molecules. But if want to reword the article or rename it, I won't object. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 20:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

525059 +++$+++ Nurg +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-24 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.151217960E09 +++$+++ Referring to you as creator of [[Articular capsules]] - anatomy is not really my subj area: I suggest that [[Articular capsules]] should perhaps be merged into [[Joint capsule]]. They seem to be the same thing and I suspect \"joint\" is a more easily recognised term than \"articular\". I'm puzzled about the plural in the first title but that won't be an issue if it's merged into joint capsule. regards  +++$+++ Referring to you as creator of [[Articular capsules]] - anatomy is not really my subj area: I suggest that [[Articular capsules]] should perhaps be merged into [[Joint capsule]]. They seem to be the same thing and I suspect "joint" is a more easily recognised term than "articular". I'm puzzled about the plural in the first title but that won't be an issue if it's merged into joint capsule. regards [[User:Nurg|Nurg]] 23:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
525060 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525059 +++$+++ 525059 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.151396760E09 +++$+++ I have no objection to that proposal. -- +++$+++ :I have no objection to that proposal. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

772 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-03 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.172990940E09 +++$+++ So, according to the state of our knowledge of Haplogroup C3 at present, Haplogroup C3 cannot be used to demonstrate a close ethnic relationship between Koreans and any other population. If anything, the high diversity and unique clustering of Korean C3* Y-chromosomes is yet another piece of evidence (in addition to the high frequency of uniquely Korean O2b1* Y-chromosomes) that suggests that the Koreans have a very long history as a separate \"race\" (or \"ethnic group\" or whatever you want to call it).  +++$+++ So, according to the state of our knowledge of Haplogroup C3 at present, Haplogroup C3 cannot be used to demonstrate a close ethnic relationship between Koreans and any other population. If anything, the high diversity and unique clustering of Korean C3* Y-chromosomes is yet another piece of evidence (in addition to the high frequency of uniquely Korean O2b1* Y-chromosomes) that suggests that the Koreans have a very long history as a separate "race" (or "ethnic group" or whatever you want to call it). [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 22:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
773 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 772 +++$+++ 772 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.174475040E09 +++$+++ Actually, [http:\/\/www.imbice.org.ar\/es\/lab_06_b\/06.pdf another study that I have just reviewed] has found Haplogroup C3 Y-chromosomes in only 17 out of a sample of 101 Manchu males. If this is not a fluke due to regional variation within the Manchu population, then it means that only about 16.8% of Manchu males belong to Haplogroup C3, including approximately 8.9% in C3-M217* and approximately 7.9% in C3c-M48. Haplogroup C3c-M48 appears to be a very recently-expanded \"Altaic\" haplogroup that is found mainly in Mongolians and Kazakhs. Haplogroup C3c-M48 has not been found in any sample of Koreans as far as I know, and it is also not found among Han Chinese. However, Hammer et al.'s \"Dual origins of the Japanese\" article reported three Japanese individuals (among their sample of 259) who displayed the M86 mutation, which is believed to be a subclade of C3c that has expanded during historical times, mainly among Siberian Tungusic tribes. I would not be surprised if the sporadic instances of Haplogroup C3c-M86 and Haplogroup N3a-M178 among Japanese (and perhaps also some of the Japanese individuals who belong to the Haplogroup Q-P36, Haplogroup I-P19, and Haplogroup R-M207 clades) were due to the historically recorded invasions of the \u8085\u613c ([[Sushen]], Suksin) to the Hokuriku and Ezo regions of Japan. In fact, I have read on a Japanese website that Haplogroup N is especially frequent in Japan in the area around the Noto Peninsula on the Japan Sea coast, which is part of the Hokuriku region that was invaded by the so-called \"Sushen\" (or Mishipase\/Ashipase). In any case, Haplogroup C3c Y-chromosomes have not been found even sporadically among Koreans or Han Chinese, which basically precludes any possibility of a major ethnic mixing between Mongolians and either Koreans or Han Chinese during the historical and proto-historical periods. Haplogroup C3* is found at moderate frequency among both Manchus (approx. 8.9%) and Koreans (approx. 16.5% among South Koreans and approx. 12.7% among Korean Chinese) as well as among northern Han Chinese (as much as 9.5% in a sample of 42 Northern Hans), so the possibility of recent intermixture between Northern Hans, proto-Manchus, and proto-Koreans seems much more likely. The proto-Turco-Mongolians were probably isolated (perhaps by the Gobi Desert) from the East Asian groups and more involved with the Indo-European Scythians and Uralic Samoyeds that dwelt to their west.  +++$+++ :Actually, [http://www.imbice.org.ar/es/lab_06_b/06.pdf another study that I have just reviewed] has found Haplogroup C3 Y-chromosomes in only 17 out of a sample of 101 Manchu males. If this is not a fluke due to regional variation within the Manchu population, then it means that only about 16.8% of Manchu males belong to Haplogroup C3, including approximately 8.9% in C3-M217* and approximately 7.9% in C3c-M48. Haplogroup C3c-M48 appears to be a very recently-expanded "Altaic" haplogroup that is found mainly in Mongolians and Kazakhs. Haplogroup C3c-M48 has not been found in any sample of Koreans as far as I know, and it is also not found among Han Chinese. However, Hammer et al.'s "Dual origins of the Japanese" article reported three Japanese individuals (among their sample of 259) who displayed the M86 mutation, which is believed to be a subclade of C3c that has expanded during historical times, mainly among Siberian Tungusic tribes. I would not be surprised if the sporadic instances of Haplogroup C3c-M86 and Haplogroup N3a-M178 among Japanese (and perhaps also some of the Japanese individuals who belong to the Haplogroup Q-P36, Haplogroup I-P19, and Haplogroup R-M207 clades) were due to the historically recorded invasions of the 肅愼 ([[Sushen]], Suksin) to the Hokuriku and Ezo regions of Japan. In fact, I have read on a Japanese website that Haplogroup N is especially frequent in Japan in the area around the Noto Peninsula on the Japan Sea coast, which is part of the Hokuriku region that was invaded by the so-called "Sushen" (or Mishipase/Ashipase). In any case, Haplogroup C3c Y-chromosomes have not been found even sporadically among Koreans or Han Chinese, which basically precludes any possibility of a major ethnic mixing between Mongolians and either Koreans or Han Chinese during the historical and proto-historical periods. Haplogroup C3* is found at moderate frequency among both Manchus (approx. 8.9%) and Koreans (approx. 16.5% among South Koreans and approx. 12.7% among Korean Chinese) as well as among northern Han Chinese (as much as 9.5% in a sample of 42 Northern Hans), so the possibility of recent intermixture between Northern Hans, proto-Manchus, and proto-Koreans seems much more likely. The proto-Turco-Mongolians were probably isolated (perhaps by the Gobi Desert) from the East Asian groups and more involved with the Indo-European Scythians and Uralic Samoyeds that dwelt to their west. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 04:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

525061 +++$+++ Aguerriero +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-26 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.151387400E09 +++$+++ Howdy!  I'm not sure if you're aware, but [[User:Btarski]] filed a case with the Mediation Cabal regarding the article split at [[Electron Transport Chain]].  I took the case.  I am going to spend a few hours reviewing the situation, and then I will post to the article talk page requesting comments, and we'll hammer out a compromise.  Sound good?  In the mean time, let me know if there is anything additional I should know. --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ Howdy!  I'm not sure if you're aware, but [[User:Btarski]] filed a case with the Mediation Cabal regarding the article split at [[Electron Transport Chain]].  I took the case.  I am going to spend a few hours reviewing the situation, and then I will post to the article talk page requesting comments, and we'll hammer out a compromise.  Sound good?  In the mean time, let me know if there is anything additional I should know. --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Aguerriero|Aguerriero]] ([[User_talk:Aguerriero|talk]])</font> 22:50, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
525062 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525061 +++$+++ 525061 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.151400420E09 +++$+++ Sounds good. I received a hostile and sarcastic email from Btarski on March 18th expressing his objections to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Electron_transport_chain&diff=44291532&oldid=44242144 my restoration of the diagram he deleted], so I'm happy to leave this in the hands of a mediator. If you want or need a copy of his email, let me know, but for the most part I'd prefer to let the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Electron_transport_chain&action=history edit history] and [[Talk:Electron_transport_chain#Incorrect_diagram|talk page]] speak for themselves. I do want to point out though, that contrary to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal\/Cases\/2006-06-23_Electron_Transport&diff=prev&oldid=60212398 Btarski's claims], I do not believe I deleted any content when I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Electron_transport_chain&diff=59171996&oldid=59002254 split] the [[Wikipedia:Article_size#A_rule_of_thumb|36 kilobyte article]], so this may at least in part be due to a misunderstanding from a user [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Btarski relatively new to the editing process]. If I am wrong and I did inadvertently delete content, I of course would have no objection to correcting that error. I am an [http:\/\/meta.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Eventualism eventualist], but I certainly concede that the beginnings and endings of the new articles became more awkward immediately after the split. -- +++$+++ :Sounds good. I received a hostile and sarcastic email from Btarski on March 18th expressing his objections to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electron_transport_chain&diff=44291532&oldid=44242144 my restoration of the diagram he deleted], so I'm happy to leave this in the hands of a mediator. If you want or need a copy of his email, let me know, but for the most part I'd prefer to let the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electron_transport_chain&action=history edit history] and [[Talk:Electron_transport_chain#Incorrect_diagram|talk page]] speak for themselves. I do want to point out though, that contrary to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-06-23_Electron_Transport&diff=prev&oldid=60212398 Btarski's claims], I do not believe I deleted any content when I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electron_transport_chain&diff=59171996&oldid=59002254 split] the [[Wikipedia:Article_size#A_rule_of_thumb|36 kilobyte article]], so this may at least in part be due to a misunderstanding from a user [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Btarski relatively new to the editing process]. If I am wrong and I did inadvertently delete content, I of course would have no objection to correcting that error. I am an [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eventualism eventualist], but I certainly concede that the beginnings and endings of the new articles became more awkward immediately after the split. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 02:27, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
525063 +++$+++ Aguerriero +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525061 +++$+++ 525062 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.151401380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the quick response.  Btarski has responded also, so I feel confident that this can be resolved quickly.  He has requested to discuss some things offline, so I have invited him to e-mail me.  Shortly, I will post a summary of the issue as I understand it to the article talk page and we can get things rolling.  Take care --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks for the quick response.  Btarski has responded also, so I feel confident that this can be resolved quickly.  He has requested to discuss some things offline, so I have invited him to e-mail me.  Shortly, I will post a summary of the issue as I understand it to the article talk page and we can get things rolling.  Take care --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Aguerriero|Aguerriero]] ([[User_talk:Aguerriero|talk]])</font> 02:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
525064 +++$+++ Aguerriero +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525061 +++$+++ 525063 +++$+++ 2006-06-28 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.151558460E09 +++$+++ Hello, Btarski has responded to the compromise offer with a counter-offer.  Please review and comment.  Also, I have contacted Btarski and asked that he continue to take every opportunity to be civil and assume good faith in this matter. <font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ :::Hello, Btarski has responded to the compromise offer with a counter-offer.  Please review and comment.  Also, I have contacted Btarski and asked that he continue to take every opportunity to be civil and assume good faith in this matter. <font color="3300FF">[[User:Aguerriero|Aguerriero]] ([[User_talk:Aguerriero|talk]])</font> 22:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

775 +++$+++ Cydevil +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 775 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-15 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.173975540E09 +++$+++ Any thoughts on [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=4T3tQGU8Q7c this]?  +++$+++ Any thoughts on [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4T3tQGU8Q7c this]? [[User:Cydevil|Cydevil]] 09:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
776 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 775 +++$+++ 775 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.173977160E09 +++$+++ More than anything else, I think this reflects the fact that the population of Japan has not gone through any bottleneck for a very long time. I have read studies that have found 0% of the mtDNA sequences to match in a comparison between samples of Han Chinese and Japanese. Dr. Horai's finding that approximately 25% of Japanese mtDNA sequences were of the \"common Han Chinese type\" (I believe this is mtDNA Haplogroup D5) does not mean that these female ancestors were historical Chinese immigrants; I think this 25% of mtDNA in Japan that is '''similar''' to the common Han Chinese mtDNA type(s) is more likely to reflect the continuation in Japan of a female line that happened to become extremely frequent among the Han Chinese. It seems rather parallel to the approximately 20% of Haplogroup O3-M122 Y-DNA that is found among modern Japanese. I would predict that the approximately 25% of \"Han Chinese type\" mtDNA to which Dr. Horai refers in that blurb is only related to actual Han Chinese samples at the same level as the approximately 20% of \"Han Chinese type\" Y-DNA that is found in Japan is related to actual Han Chinese O3-M122 Y-chromosomes. One should keep in mind that a similar or even greater percentage of the Y-DNA of even Polynesian populations is also of that \"Han Chinese type.\"  +++$+++ :More than anything else, I think this reflects the fact that the population of Japan has not gone through any bottleneck for a very long time. I have read studies that have found 0% of the mtDNA sequences to match in a comparison between samples of Han Chinese and Japanese. Dr. Horai's finding that approximately 25% of Japanese mtDNA sequences were of the "common Han Chinese type" (I believe this is mtDNA Haplogroup D5) does not mean that these female ancestors were historical Chinese immigrants; I think this 25% of mtDNA in Japan that is '''similar''' to the common Han Chinese mtDNA type(s) is more likely to reflect the continuation in Japan of a female line that happened to become extremely frequent among the Han Chinese. It seems rather parallel to the approximately 20% of Haplogroup O3-M122 Y-DNA that is found among modern Japanese. I would predict that the approximately 25% of "Han Chinese type" mtDNA to which Dr. Horai refers in that blurb is only related to actual Han Chinese samples at the same level as the approximately 20% of "Han Chinese type" Y-DNA that is found in Japan is related to actual Han Chinese O3-M122 Y-chromosomes. One should keep in mind that a similar or even greater percentage of the Y-DNA of even Polynesian populations is also of that "Han Chinese type." [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 09:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
777 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 775 +++$+++ 775 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.173977940E09 +++$+++ I think it is fundamentally wrong to try to relate a certain haplogroup to a specific historical or present-day ethnicity. For example, the mtDNA haplogroup that is most common among Han Chinese (D5, I believe) is also the most common mtDNA haplogroup among most Siberian \"Altaic\" populations. Does that mean that Siberians are also Han Chinese? No, of course not. It just means that most present-day Siberians and Han Chinese are directly descended in the maternal line from a female ancestor who lived more recently than the common matrilineal ancestor of most Siberians or Han Chinese and, say, Iraqis. There is also a great deal of evidence to suggest that mitochondrial DNA is directly subject to evolutionary selection, which makes me strongly favor Y-DNA over mtDNA in comparisons among human populations.  +++$+++ :I think it is fundamentally wrong to try to relate a certain haplogroup to a specific historical or present-day ethnicity. For example, the mtDNA haplogroup that is most common among Han Chinese (D5, I believe) is also the most common mtDNA haplogroup among most Siberian "Altaic" populations. Does that mean that Siberians are also Han Chinese? No, of course not. It just means that most present-day Siberians and Han Chinese are directly descended in the maternal line from a female ancestor who lived more recently than the common matrilineal ancestor of most Siberians or Han Chinese and, say, Iraqis. There is also a great deal of evidence to suggest that mitochondrial DNA is directly subject to evolutionary selection, which makes me strongly favor Y-DNA over mtDNA in comparisons among human populations. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] 09:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

262920 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-10 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.210411800E09 +++$+++ For the [[ Wikipedia:FCDW\/May 12, 2008|FL dispatch]], I have shortened the bit about longer lists (in fact, if we can get enough together about the directors and policy changes, we could just scrap that part altogether), I expanded the section on the director (I have to admit, I feel a little weird writing about myself) and I added a very brief section about the policy change discussion. I was wondering if you would mind expanding the policy section, simply because you have been more involved in the discussion than me and you could do a better job at it. Thanks,  +++$+++ For the [[ Wikipedia:FCDW/May 12, 2008|FL dispatch]], I have shortened the bit about longer lists (in fact, if we can get enough together about the directors and policy changes, we could just scrap that part altogether), I expanded the section on the director (I have to admit, I feel a little weird writing about myself) and I added a very brief section about the policy change discussion. I was wondering if you would mind expanding the policy section, simply because you have been more involved in the discussion than me and you could do a better job at it. Thanks, [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 02:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
262921 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262920 +++$+++ 262920 +++$+++ 2008-05-12 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.210639440E09 +++$+++ Colin, sorry for my enforced absence and inability to add anything pertinent to the dispatch, but I thought it worthwhile if we could mention there that the Peer Review process now effectively guarantees a set of comments within three days (which it ''never'' did for lists) so FLCs should be encouraged to go through PR first...  So often in the past FLC has been a dumping ground for rubbish which, due to the diligence of a number of reviewers, has come good in the end, but ordinarily (at FAC, say) result in a pile-on oppose for simple failures of MOS, lack of references etc.   +++$+++ :Colin, sorry for my enforced absence and inability to add anything pertinent to the dispatch, but I thought it worthwhile if we could mention there that the Peer Review process now effectively guarantees a set of comments within three days (which it ''never'' did for lists) so FLCs should be encouraged to go through PR first...  So often in the past FLC has been a dumping ground for rubbish which, due to the diligence of a number of reviewers, has come good in the end, but ordinarily (at FAC, say) result in a pile-on oppose for simple failures of MOS, lack of references etc.  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 17:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
262922 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262920 +++$+++ 262921 +++$+++ 2008-05-12 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.210641660E09 +++$+++ Heh, dumping ground may have been harsh but given the number of lists I've reviewed in the past which should have been copyedited, checked for MOS etc etc, because PR has been bypassed, I've lost count.  As for changes in policy at PR, no, nothing has happened officially but [[User:Ruhrfisch]] has instigated a PR backlog campaign which will attempt to ensure all reviews have some kind of significant comment within three days.  It's worked okay recently (although I was one of the keen reviewers and that's changed lately due to my obligations elsewhere), and I just think it's worth re-emphasising that it's an important part of the featured list process which recently has been 100% bypassed.  Since you're busy I'll try to add something myself... cheers.   +++$+++ ::Heh, dumping ground may have been harsh but given the number of lists I've reviewed in the past which should have been copyedited, checked for MOS etc etc, because PR has been bypassed, I've lost count.  As for changes in policy at PR, no, nothing has happened officially but [[User:Ruhrfisch]] has instigated a PR backlog campaign which will attempt to ensure all reviews have some kind of significant comment within three days.  It's worked okay recently (although I was one of the keen reviewers and that's changed lately due to my obligations elsewhere), and I just think it's worth re-emphasising that it's an important part of the featured list process which recently has been 100% bypassed.  Since you're busy I'll try to add something myself... cheers.  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 18:21, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

43820 +++$+++ Jpgordon +++$+++ Cmguy777 +++$+++ 43820 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-26 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.253970660E09 +++$+++ Hi. I've reverted all your changes to [[Ulysses S. Grant]], since every one I looked at was a cut and paste from another website, and we don't allow that on Wikipedia; we treat copyright very carefully here. -- +++$+++ Hi. I've reverted all your changes to [[Ulysses S. Grant]], since every one I looked at was a cut and paste from another website, and we don't allow that on Wikipedia; we treat copyright very carefully here. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 06:11, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
43821 +++$+++ Jpgordon +++$+++ Cmguy777 +++$+++ 43820 +++$+++ 43820 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.254034200E09 +++$+++ Feel free to correct information that is incorrect. Don't cut and paste from other sites, even if you cite the sources; it's still a copyright violation to do so. I knew I'd likely throw out some baby with the bathwater, but I wasn't going to sift through the chaff of copyright issues to find the wheat to preserve. (Can I mix some more metaphors in here?) -- +++$+++ :Feel free to correct information that is incorrect. Don't cut and paste from other sites, even if you cite the sources; it's still a copyright violation to do so. I knew I'd likely throw out some baby with the bathwater, but I wasn't going to sift through the chaff of copyright issues to find the wheat to preserve. (Can I mix some more metaphors in here?) --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 23:50, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
43822 +++$+++ Jpgordon +++$+++ Cmguy777 +++$+++ 43820 +++$+++ 43821 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.254034860E09 +++$+++ OK, I've looked at your new work. And I've looked at the source. We need to do a LOT better than this for sourcing, and we can. Everything on that list (which is the sort of random list of trivia we discourage from Wikipedia articles) is sourced to five books -- which should be referenced and cited, not this list. Also, while I'm here - please desist from making dozens upon dozens of consecutive edits to article. Become familiar with the \"preview\" button, which should save a lot of error correction. Also, please use the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] field. Good work on the data improvement, certainly. -- +++$+++ ::OK, I've looked at your new work. And I've looked at the source. We need to do a LOT better than this for sourcing, and we can. Everything on that list (which is the sort of random list of trivia we discourage from Wikipedia articles) is sourced to five books -- which should be referenced and cited, not this list. Also, while I'm here - please desist from making dozens upon dozens of consecutive edits to article. Become familiar with the "preview" button, which should save a lot of error correction. Also, please use the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] field. Good work on the data improvement, certainly. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 00:01, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
43823 +++$+++ Jpgordon +++$+++ Cmguy777 +++$+++ 43820 +++$+++ 43821 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.254050280E09 +++$+++ Sure, web sites can be used. But take a look at our [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and [[WP:V|verifiability]] policies. Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source (since you and I can edit it without anyone looking over our shoulders). However, its goal is to point people to reliable sources...ah ha! I just might be wrong regarding your source. The author is one Diane Meives, who is some sort of Grant historian (whether professional or amateur, I didn't dig deep enough to know.) And the entire Grant website looks pretty darned good. So that's a good source after all. Sorry to have said otherwise. -- +++$+++ ::Sure, web sites can be used. But take a look at our [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and [[WP:V|verifiability]] policies. Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source (since you and I can edit it without anyone looking over our shoulders). However, its goal is to point people to reliable sources...ah ha! I just might be wrong regarding your source. The author is one Diane Meives, who is some sort of Grant historian (whether professional or amateur, I didn't dig deep enough to know.) And the entire Grant website looks pretty darned good. So that's a good source after all. Sorry to have said otherwise. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 04:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
43824 +++$+++ Jpgordon +++$+++ Cmguy777 +++$+++ 43820 +++$+++ 43820 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.254739500E09 +++$+++ Problem is, you're still doing something that would get you a failing grade in school if you got caught; you're copying text from other sites and making very very minor changes to them. -- +++$+++ :Problem is, you're still doing something that would get you a failing grade in school if you got caught; you're copying text from other sites and making very very minor changes to them. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 03:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

480727 +++$+++ Shreshth91 +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-15 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.142465580E09 +++$+++ Hey there. I saw you've been handed the reins of power. First of all, congrats! I was thinking of a new way of answering questions, a way in which nobody can see the others' answers. Why don't we use e-mail. That way, it can be completely secret. I know, Wikipedia is all about transparency, but many people use it to their advantage, just to squeeze out a few more points. Consider it.--<span class=\"user-sig user-Shreshth91\">May the Force be with you!   +++$+++ Hey there. I saw you've been handed the reins of power. First of all, congrats! I was thinking of a new way of answering questions, a way in which nobody can see the others' answers. Why don't we use e-mail. That way, it can be completely secret. I know, Wikipedia is all about transparency, but many people use it to their advantage, just to squeeze out a few more points. Consider it.--<span class="user-sig user-Shreshth91">May the Force be with you!  [[User:Shreshth91|Shreshth91]]<small><font color="green">[[User talk:Shreshth91|($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|)]]</font></small></span> 15:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
480728 +++$+++ Celestianpower +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480727 +++$+++ 480727 +++$+++ 2006-03-16 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.142545080E09 +++$+++ I think that while this a good idea in principle, I don't see it as necessary at this time. It's only a bit of fun: The only people they are cheating are themselves. --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Celestianpower\/Esperanza|es]]<\/font> +++$+++ : I think that while this a good idea in principle, I don't see it as necessary at this time. It's only a bit of fun: The only people they are cheating are themselves. --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color="green">[[User:Celestianpower/Esperanza|es]]</font>[[User:celestianpower|tianpower]] <sup>[[user talk:Celestianpower|háblame]]</sup> 13:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

262924 +++$+++ Qst +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-26 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.211852640E09 +++$+++ I'd appreciate it if you could elaborate on the areas which I have mentioned. Thanks,  +++$+++ I'd appreciate it if you could elaborate on the areas which I have mentioned. Thanks, [[User:Qst|Qst]] ([[User talk:Qst|talk]]) 18:44, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
262925 +++$+++ Qst +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262924 +++$+++ 262924 +++$+++ 2008-05-27 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.211919120E09 +++$+++ Would you be willing to offer your support if I created 20-25 of the actual SSSI articles and linked the others to the nearest village\/district?  +++$+++ :Would you be willing to offer your support if I created 20-25 of the actual SSSI articles and linked the others to the nearest village/district? [[User:Qst|Qst]] ([[User talk:Qst|talk]]) 13:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
262926 +++$+++ Qst +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262924 +++$+++ 262925 +++$+++ 2008-05-27 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.211920380E09 +++$+++ Also, I apologise for my seemingly-unfriendly attitude before.  +++$+++ ::Also, I apologise for my seemingly-unfriendly attitude before. [[User:Qst|Qst]] ([[User talk:Qst|talk]]) 13:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
262927 +++$+++ Qst +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262924 +++$+++ 262926 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.212024720E09 +++$+++ Hi, Colin. With the help of {{user|Sunderland06}} who offered to help on IRC, most of the articles are now linked to actual SSSI articles, and the others are linked to the town village where it is located. I was unable to find enough free images to fill the side of the list, but in light of these new developments, are you now willing to offer your support?  +++$+++ :::Hi, Colin. With the help of {{user|Sunderland06}} who offered to help on IRC, most of the articles are now linked to actual SSSI articles, and the others are linked to the town village where it is located. I was unable to find enough free images to fill the side of the list, but in light of these new developments, are you now willing to offer your support? [[User:Qst|Qst]] ([[User talk:Qst|talk]]) 18:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

782 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 782 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-29 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.201621440E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you removed a section of text because the reference was not in English, saying \"References ''must'' be in the English language'' in your edit summary. I believe this is incorrect. WP:CITE  says \"Because this is the English Wikipedia, English-language sources ''should be given whenever possible'', and should always be used in preference to other language sources of equal calibre. However, do give references ''in other languages where appropriate''. If quoting from a different language source, an English translation should be given with the original-language quote beside it.\" Would you consider restoring the text?  +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you removed a section of text because the reference was not in English, saying "References ''must'' be in the English language'' in your edit summary. I believe this is incorrect. WP:CITE  says "Because this is the English Wikipedia, English-language sources ''should be given whenever possible'', and should always be used in preference to other language sources of equal calibre. However, do give references ''in other languages where appropriate''. If quoting from a different language source, an English translation should be given with the original-language quote beside it." Would you consider restoring the text? [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 07:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
783 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 782 +++$+++ 782 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.201707960E09 +++$+++ I would be against restoring the text even if an English-language source (or a translation of the previously cited German-language source) were provided, however, because the hypothesis of a common origin of the Mongolian, Manchu, and Japanese languages is '''''extremely''''' controversial. This hypothesis has not been proven to a degree that a majority of Japanese language specialists would accept the deleted claim of a \"systematic correspondence\" among these three languages. Basically, a claim of that sort does not belong on the [[Japanese language]] wiki-page (except in the subsection about classification of the Japanese language); you might post it on the [[Altaic languages]] page instead if you desperately want to resurrect the deleted text and citation.  +++$+++ :I would be against restoring the text even if an English-language source (or a translation of the previously cited German-language source) were provided, however, because the hypothesis of a common origin of the Mongolian, Manchu, and Japanese languages is '''''extremely''''' controversial. This hypothesis has not been proven to a degree that a majority of Japanese language specialists would accept the deleted claim of a "systematic correspondence" among these three languages. Basically, a claim of that sort does not belong on the [[Japanese language]] wiki-page (except in the subsection about classification of the Japanese language); you might post it on the [[Altaic languages]] page instead if you desperately want to resurrect the deleted text and citation. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] ([[User talk:Ebizur#top|talk]]) 07:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

262928 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-27 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.211909340E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in the West Midlands]] - your comments have been addressed. [[User:Rudget|<span style=\"color:#8B0000;font-weight:bold\">Rudget<\/span>]]  <small>( +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in the West Midlands]] - your comments have been addressed. [[User:Rudget|<span style="color:#8B0000;font-weight:bold">Rudget</span>]]  <small>([[User:Rudget/help|Help]]?)</small> 10:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
262929 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262928 +++$+++ 262928 +++$+++ 2008-05-27 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.211919300E09 +++$+++ Thank you for helping out &mdash; your assistance is appreciated. [[User:Rudget|<span style=\"color:#8B0000;font-weight:bold\">Rudget<\/span>]]  <small>( +++$+++ :Thank you for helping out &mdash; your assistance is appreciated. [[User:Rudget|<span style="color:#8B0000;font-weight:bold">Rudget</span>]]  <small>([[User:Rudget/help|Help]]?)</small> 13:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

787 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-21 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.206103200E09 +++$+++ Wondering why you want a ref for Ainu in [[language isolate]], but no other language, and then only for certain parts of its range.  +++$+++ Wondering why you want a ref for Ainu in [[language isolate]], but no other language, and then only for certain parts of its range. [[User:Kwamikagami|— kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 05:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
788 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 787 +++$+++ 787 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.206103680E09 +++$+++ It is because I have studied the [[Ainu language]] myself, and I have never encountered any record of the language being spoken in Honshuu.  +++$+++ :It is because I have studied the [[Ainu language]] myself, and I have never encountered any record of the language being spoken in Honshuu. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] ([[User talk:Ebizur#top|talk]]) 05:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
789 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 787 +++$+++ 788 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.206106320E09 +++$+++ Any history of Japan should have it. Wars with the Ainu as the Japanese moved into Kant\u014d, Ainu place names south nearly to Nagoya, etc. Last time I was in Kinukuniya, I saw a book on one of the display tables claiming the samurai were predominantly of Ainu descent. I don't know if there's anything to that, but it shows that the idea of eastern Honsh\u016b being originally Ainu is common knowledge in Japan.  +++$+++ ::Any history of Japan should have it. Wars with the Ainu as the Japanese moved into Kantō, Ainu place names south nearly to Nagoya, etc. Last time I was in Kinukuniya, I saw a book on one of the display tables claiming the samurai were predominantly of Ainu descent. I don't know if there's anything to that, but it shows that the idea of eastern Honshū being originally Ainu is common knowledge in Japan. [[User:Kwamikagami|— kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 06:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
790 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 787 +++$+++ 789 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.206108480E09 +++$+++ The idea that there was ever any significant number of speakers of the Ainu language in Honshuu is one of those persistent pseudoscientific rumors that belongs in the company of [[cryptozoology|Sasquatch]] and [[Aryan supremacy|Aryan supermen]]. It is not substantiated by historical or ethnographical evidence.  +++$+++ :::The idea that there was ever any significant number of speakers of the Ainu language in Honshuu is one of those persistent pseudoscientific rumors that belongs in the company of [[cryptozoology|Sasquatch]] and [[Aryan supremacy|Aryan supermen]]. It is not substantiated by historical or ethnographical evidence. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] ([[User talk:Ebizur#top|talk]]) 07:08, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
791 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 787 +++$+++ 790 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.206108900E09 +++$+++ Why do you say that?  +++$+++ ::::Why do you say that? [[User:Kwamikagami|— kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 07:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
792 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 787 +++$+++ 790 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.206112620E09 +++$+++ What about ''Race, Ethnicity and Migration in Modern Japan'' (Weiner 2004)? Or any of the dozens of books you can find on Google by searching Ainu+Honshu?  +++$+++ ::::What about ''Race, Ethnicity and Migration in Modern Japan'' (Weiner 2004)? Or any of the dozens of books you can find on Google by searching Ainu+Honshu? [[User:Kwamikagami|— kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 08:17, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

262934 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-17 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.213741800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
262935 +++$+++ Tatterfly +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262934 +++$+++ 262934 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.213745400E09 +++$+++ I do agree that [[medical seizure]] may work better as [[seizure (medicine)]], which currently redirects to it. That is something an administrator would have to help with. Otherwise, I feel that the setup I changed it to makes it easier to find any term pertaining to the word \"[[seizure]].\"  +++$+++ :I do agree that [[medical seizure]] may work better as [[seizure (medicine)]], which currently redirects to it. That is something an administrator would have to help with. Otherwise, I feel that the setup I changed it to makes it easier to find any term pertaining to the word "[[seizure]]." [[User:Tatterfly|Tatterfly]] ([[User talk:Tatterfly#top|talk]]) 16:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
262936 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262934 +++$+++ 262935 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.213745940E09 +++$+++ I've moved the article to [[Seizure (medicine)]].  +++$+++ ::I've moved the article to [[Seizure (medicine)]]. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 16:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
262937 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262934 +++$+++ 262935 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.213746660E09 +++$+++ I think we need to discuss this area before performing more moves.  +++$+++ ::I think we need to discuss this area before performing more moves. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
262938 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262934 +++$+++ 262937 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.213747260E09 +++$+++ Ack, sorry. The practicalities shouldn't be a concern here, even if they are an issue. Doy you think it would be best to a) leave the article where it is while other editors provide input over at [[WT:MED]], b) reverse it to the move done by Tatterfly (i.e. to \"[[Medical seizure]]\", or c) attempt to undo the June 2 move of [[Seizure]]?  +++$+++ :::Ack, sorry. The practicalities shouldn't be a concern here, even if they are an issue. Doy you think it would be best to a) leave the article where it is while other editors provide input over at [[WT:MED]], b) reverse it to the move done by Tatterfly (i.e. to "[[Medical seizure]]", or c) attempt to undo the June 2 move of [[Seizure]]? [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 17:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

525080 +++$+++ Aristiana +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525080 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-24 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.153789980E09 +++$+++ I'm just curious... How did you notice?  +++$+++ I'm just curious... How did you notice? [[User:Aristiana|Aristiana]] 18:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
525081 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525080 +++$+++ 525080 +++$+++ 2006-07-24 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.153790280E09 +++$+++ Many of your edits were on my [[Help:Watching pages|watchlist]], so I could see the pattern. -- +++$+++ :Many of your edits were on my [[Help:Watching pages|watchlist]], so I could see the pattern. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 18:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

525082 +++$+++ T00h00 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-27 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.154046000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:T00h00|TH]] 17:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
525083 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525082 +++$+++ 525082 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.154053800E09 +++$+++ Try [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)]] and [[Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context]]. But I wouldn't worry too much about [[overlinking]] at [[neuroendocrine tumors]] -- the article could support many more before it became distracting. -- +++$+++ :Try [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)]] and [[Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context]]. But I wouldn't worry too much about [[overlinking]] at [[neuroendocrine tumors]] -- the article could support many more before it became distracting. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 19:30, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

795 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-17 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.218982020E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 07:07, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
796 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 795 +++$+++ 795 +++$+++ 2008-08-17 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.218983400E09 +++$+++ Please refer to the Ainu language talk page: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Ainu_language#Ainu_in_Honshuu.3F].  +++$+++ :Please refer to the Ainu language talk page: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ainu_language#Ainu_in_Honshuu.3F]. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] ([[User talk:Ebizur#top|talk]]) 07:30, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

525084 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-03 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.154674680E09 +++$+++ What did you mean by: \"added stub content just to get the ball rolling\"?-- +++$+++ What did you mean by: "added stub content just to get the ball rolling"?--[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] | [[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Talk]] 23:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
525085 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525084 +++$+++ 525084 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.154675700E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, I should have been more clear and more international in the language I used in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28Medicine-related_articles%29&diff=prev&oldid=67528508 my edit]. \"Get the ball rolling\" is an American idiom, drawing an analogy between a process and [[Friction#Static_friction|static friction]]. It refers to the idea that once something is begun, it becomes easier to make further forward progress. -- +++$+++ :I'm sorry, I should have been more clear and more international in the language I used in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28Medicine-related_articles%29&diff=prev&oldid=67528508 my edit]. "Get the ball rolling" is an American idiom, drawing an analogy between a process and [[Friction#Static_friction|static friction]]. It refers to the idea that once something is begun, it becomes easier to make further forward progress. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 00:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

798 +++$+++ Cadenas2008 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-23 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.237852380E09 +++$+++ South (Dinka, Shilluk , Nuer, Borgu, Nuba) all had '''0% M267''', but you are right though I should reword it without changing it to  Northern Sudanese.  +++$+++ South (Dinka, Shilluk , Nuer, Borgu, Nuba) all had '''0% M267''', but you are right though I should reword it without changing it to  Northern Sudanese. [[User:Cadenas2008|Cadenas2008]] ([[User talk:Cadenas2008|talk]]) 16:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
799 +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 798 +++$+++ 798 +++$+++ 2009-04-02 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.238720220E09 +++$+++ For example, if you would group the Nubians, Beja, Copts, and the three Arab populations (Gaalien, Meseria, and Arakien) together as \"Northern Sudanese,\" then the frequency of haplogroup J-12f2(xJ2-M172) in this pool of samples should be 90\/216 = 41.7%, and not 94\/445 = 21.1%.  +++$+++ :For example, if you would group the Nubians, Beja, Copts, and the three Arab populations (Gaalien, Meseria, and Arakien) together as "Northern Sudanese," then the frequency of haplogroup J-12f2(xJ2-M172) in this pool of samples should be 90/216 = 41.7%, and not 94/445 = 21.1%. [[User:Ebizur|Ebizur]] ([[User talk:Ebizur#top|talk]]) 17:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

499303 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.163619360E09 +++$+++ \u2190 Hahaha, that's funny. You should see the talkpage then, I tried running it through the translator, and it doesn't sound friendly at all... <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ← Hahaha, that's funny. You should see the talkpage then, I tried running it through the translator, and it doesn't sound friendly at all... <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 11:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
499304 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499303 +++$+++ 499303 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.163620020E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_WikipediaWeekly\/SpecialEpisode1\/transcript&diff=prev&oldid=87965748 Done]. <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_WikipediaWeekly/SpecialEpisode1/transcript&diff=prev&oldid=87965748 Done]. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 11:47, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
499305 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499303 +++$+++ 499304 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163667960E09 +++$+++ o.O It wasn't ''that'' great, I just used my Google Powahs... *blushes* <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::o.O It wasn't ''that'' great, I just used my Google Powahs... *blushes* <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 01:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
499306 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499303 +++$+++ 499305 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.163669460E09 +++$+++ Well, I guess I am kind of amazing and brilliant. You've got a point. :p <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :::Well, I guess I am kind of amazing and brilliant. You've got a point. :p <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 01:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
499307 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499303 +++$+++ 499306 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.163669880E09 +++$+++ Heh, awwww. OK, enough of this Wikithing, I have to get out there and revise electrochem *ugh*. <small>Also, if I read the EA MfD page one more time, I might just say something incivil - there are some really good arguments on both sides, but oh-so-many crappy ones... <\/small> Take care, you. Oh, and my little Presario struggled too much with downloading that MP3 last night, so I'll give it a listen when I'm not attempting to do so many things with my computer at once, k? <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::::Heh, awwww. OK, enough of this Wikithing, I have to get out there and revise electrochem *ugh*. <small>Also, if I read the EA MfD page one more time, I might just say something incivil - there are some really good arguments on both sides, but oh-so-many crappy ones... </small> Take care, you. Oh, and my little Presario struggled too much with downloading that MP3 last night, so I'll give it a listen when I'm not attempting to do so many things with my computer at once, k? <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 01:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

525090 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-15 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.155652080E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, sorry to bug you.  Is there a convention on naming in [[anatomy]]?  Was wondering specifically wrt [[Hepatopancreatic ampulla]].  I do therapeutic endoscopy, and I've never heard the [[ampulla of Vater]] termed the hepatopancreatic ampulla.  Realize that eponyms are falling out of favour, but this is one that is very commonly used.  Pubmed shows all relevant citations referring to [[ampulla of Vater]].  I'm moving the entry, but please let me know if there's something I missed.  Regards --  +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, sorry to bug you.  Is there a convention on naming in [[anatomy]]?  Was wondering specifically wrt [[Hepatopancreatic ampulla]].  I do therapeutic endoscopy, and I've never heard the [[ampulla of Vater]] termed the hepatopancreatic ampulla.  Realize that eponyms are falling out of favour, but this is one that is very commonly used.  Pubmed shows all relevant citations referring to [[ampulla of Vater]].  I'm moving the entry, but please let me know if there's something I missed.  Regards -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|'''Samir''']]   <small>[[User_talk:Samir_(The_Scope)|धर्म]]</small> 07:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
525091 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525090 +++$+++ 525090 +++$+++ 2006-08-15 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.155652500E09 +++$+++ According to {{Dorlands|a_32|12127886}}, the [[Terminologia Anatomica]] (TA) is \"ampulla hepatopancreatica\", and I believe the standard is to [[Anglicisation|anglicize]] the TA. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy]] isn't too active (though it is more active than it was a few months ago), but it might be a good idea to raise the issue there to get more feedback. -- +++$+++ :According to {{Dorlands|a_32|12127886}}, the [[Terminologia Anatomica]] (TA) is "ampulla hepatopancreatica", and I believe the standard is to [[Anglicisation|anglicize]] the TA. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy]] isn't too active (though it is more active than it was a few months ago), but it might be a good idea to raise the issue there to get more feedback. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 07:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
525092 +++$+++ Mauvila +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525090 +++$+++ 525091 +++$+++ 2006-08-15 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.155705300E09 +++$+++ The official TA names are all in Latin, but for the quasi-official names (i.e. those listed in TA English reference), some names are anglicized and some aren't (e.g. flexor digiti minimi brevis).  I looked it up, and the quasi-official name is 'hepatopancreatic ampulla', but also listed as official but \"less preferred\" was the biliaropancreatic ampulla.  The trend is to move away from eponyms, and medical school texts have virtually eliminated them from texts.  For that reason, Wikipedia should probably do so as well, but continue to mention the eponyms as synonyms.  +++$+++ ::The official TA names are all in Latin, but for the quasi-official names (i.e. those listed in TA English reference), some names are anglicized and some aren't (e.g. flexor digiti minimi brevis).  I looked it up, and the quasi-official name is 'hepatopancreatic ampulla', but also listed as official but "less preferred" was the biliaropancreatic ampulla.  The trend is to move away from eponyms, and medical school texts have virtually eliminated them from texts.  For that reason, Wikipedia should probably do so as well, but continue to mention the eponyms as synonyms. [[User:Mauvila|Mauvila]] 22:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

262949 +++$+++ Tatterfly +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-01 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.214967300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Tatterfly|Tatterfly]] ([[User talk:Tatterfly|talk]]) 19:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
262950 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262949 +++$+++ 262949 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.214973540E09 +++$+++ If you still think there's a problem, you could try [[WT:MED]] but I didn't get much response when I asked last time.  +++$+++ :If you still think there's a problem, you could try [[WT:MED]] but I didn't get much response when I asked last time. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

806 +++$+++ Andrew Lancaster +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 806 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-20 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.258779780E09 +++$+++ Hi. Saw your recent edit to [[R1a]]. As a recent editor on the article your perspective on the talk page discussions right now would be appreciated. Things are slightly messy, but a few outside views might work wonders. I am writing to all recent editors of the article.-- +++$+++ Hi. Saw your recent edit to [[R1a]]. As a recent editor on the article your perspective on the talk page discussions right now would be appreciated. Things are slightly messy, but a few outside views might work wonders. I am writing to all recent editors of the article.--[[User:Andrew Lancaster|Andrew Lancaster]] ([[User talk:Andrew Lancaster|talk]]) 21:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
807 +++$+++ Andrew Lancaster +++$+++ Ebizur +++$+++ 806 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-21 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.258848420E09 +++$+++ I agree it looks hard to get into but that is just because of the failed discussions on the talkpage. I have tried to make it easy with a diff, so that you can compare two proposed versions of the [[R1a]] article. Most differences of opinion have been to do with wording, and the question of what is encyclopedic. For example, is the word haplogroup jargon that should be removed from this article about a haplogroup? See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Haplogroup_R1a_%28Y-DNA%29#Major_re-write_of_phylogeny_and_other_sections_needs_feedback].-- +++$+++ ::I agree it looks hard to get into but that is just because of the failed discussions on the talkpage. I have tried to make it easy with a diff, so that you can compare two proposed versions of the [[R1a]] article. Most differences of opinion have been to do with wording, and the question of what is encyclopedic. For example, is the word haplogroup jargon that should be removed from this article about a haplogroup? See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Haplogroup_R1a_%28Y-DNA%29#Major_re-write_of_phylogeny_and_other_sections_needs_feedback].--[[User:Andrew Lancaster|Andrew Lancaster]] ([[User talk:Andrew Lancaster|talk]]) 16:07, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

305969 +++$+++ Derry Boi +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 305969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-04 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.231119540E09 +++$+++ Hi, just wondering if you get a chance could you take a look at Template:Infobox GAA dualplayer. Seems the only way to make the last two sections work right (\"Inter County(ies)\" and \"Inter County Titles\") is if you fill in a 0 for the fields (that don't require a value) in \"Inter County Titles\", (i.e |icprovincef= ,|icprovinceh=, |icallirelandf= |icallirelandh=, |nfl=, |nhl=, |allstarsf=, |allstarsh=, |icupdate=, |clupdate=). If I try to leave them blank (i.e. to hide) then it somehow seems to merge the bottom two sections into one section and messes up the fields within it. I'm sure I've lost you at this stage :), See [[Francis McEldowney]] to see what I mean. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, just wondering if you get a chance could you take a look at Template:Infobox GAA dualplayer. Seems the only way to make the last two sections work right ("Inter County(ies)" and "Inter County Titles") is if you fill in a 0 for the fields (that don't require a value) in "Inter County Titles", (i.e |icprovincef= ,|icprovinceh=, |icallirelandf= |icallirelandh=, |nfl=, |nhl=, |allstarsf=, |allstarsh=, |icupdate=, |clupdate=). If I try to leave them blank (i.e. to hide) then it somehow seems to merge the bottom two sections into one section and messes up the fields within it. I'm sure I've lost you at this stage :), See [[Francis McEldowney]] to see what I mean. Thanks. [[User:Derry Boi|Derry Boi]] ([[User talk:Derry Boi|talk]]) 17:39, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
305970 +++$+++ Derry Boi +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 305969 +++$+++ 305969 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.231129740E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for having a look anyway.  +++$+++ :OK, thanks for having a look anyway. [[User:Derry Boi|Derry Boi]] ([[User talk:Derry Boi|talk]]) 20:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

525096 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525096 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-28 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.156824780E09 +++$+++ It appears [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Ayacop Ayacop] has [[:Image:Levonorgestrel.svg|beat me to it]]. I've added the image to the [[levonorgestrel]] page.  +++$+++ It appears [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ayacop Ayacop] has [[:Image:Levonorgestrel.svg|beat me to it]]. I've added the image to the [[levonorgestrel]] page. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 21:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
525097 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525096 +++$+++ 525096 +++$+++ 2006-08-28 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.156825020E09 +++$+++ Thanks! -- +++$+++ :Thanks! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 21:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

262953 +++$+++ delldot +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262953 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-02 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.215004920E09 +++$+++ Hi Colin, I wondered if I could ask you a favor.  I'd like to take [[pulmonary contusion]] to FAC at some point, but I'm not sure how close I am.  I had a few questions based on comments you've offered before, which I found really valuable.  I'm having trouble finding sources for the pathophysiology section, do you think resorting to primary studies would be ok for this section?  I'm not sure how strenuously I should be avoiding these studies.  Do you think there's a problem with the number of times I use the same sources?  Can you see any other problems with the references?  Any other ideas you have for improvement would be extremely helpful, but I do understand if you're busy.  Thanks much,  +++$+++ Hi Colin, I wondered if I could ask you a favor.  I'd like to take [[pulmonary contusion]] to FAC at some point, but I'm not sure how close I am.  I had a few questions based on comments you've offered before, which I found really valuable.  I'm having trouble finding sources for the pathophysiology section, do you think resorting to primary studies would be ok for this section?  I'm not sure how strenuously I should be avoiding these studies.  Do you think there's a problem with the number of times I use the same sources?  Can you see any other problems with the references?  Any other ideas you have for improvement would be extremely helpful, but I do understand if you're busy.  Thanks much, [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small> 06:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
262954 +++$+++ delldot +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262953 +++$+++ 262953 +++$+++ 2008-07-02 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.215045720E09 +++$+++ Hi! Thanks for the reply, I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Delldot&diff=223120182&oldid=223112126 replied on my talk].   +++$+++ :Hi! Thanks for the reply, I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Delldot&diff=223120182&oldid=223112126 replied on my talk].  [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small> 17:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
262955 +++$+++ delldot +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262953 +++$+++ 262954 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.215555180E09 +++$+++ Hi, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Delldot&diff=224365618&oldid=224345934 replied] again.   +++$+++ ::Hi, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Delldot&diff=224365618&oldid=224345934 replied] again.  [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small> 15:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
262956 +++$+++ delldot +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262953 +++$+++ 262955 +++$+++ 2008-07-16 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.216241640E09 +++$+++ Hi again, I think I'd like to go ahead and take it to FAC, did you see anything that really needs to be fixed before then?  Or can you make any further comments you want to make during the FAC?  Thanks much Colin, your work is always valuable because you're so thorough.  Peace,  +++$+++ :::Hi again, I think I'd like to go ahead and take it to FAC, did you see anything that really needs to be fixed before then?  Or can you make any further comments you want to make during the FAC?  Thanks much Colin, your work is always valuable because you're so thorough.  Peace, [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small> 13:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
262957 +++$+++ delldot +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262953 +++$+++ 262956 +++$+++ 2008-07-16 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.216245480E09 +++$+++ Hi, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Delldot&diff=226030799&oldid=226023187 replied].   +++$+++ ::::Hi, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Delldot&diff=226030799&oldid=226023187 replied].  [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small> 14:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

525098 +++$+++ Username132 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.156901160E09 +++$+++ The page [[Template:Protein]], doesn't show all the parameters (such as molecular weight). Wouldn't it be better to have all the parameters shown on the front page, rather than everyone who wants to use it, having to look for examples on another page? -- +++$+++ The page [[Template:Protein]], doesn't show all the parameters (such as molecular weight). Wouldn't it be better to have all the parameters shown on the front page, rather than everyone who wants to use it, having to look for examples on another page? --[[User:Username132|Username132]] ([[User talk:Username132|talk]]) 18:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
525099 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525098 +++$+++ 525098 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.157067720E09 +++$+++ I could support adding new fields. I could see some complexities, though, so I'd recommend that you post a message about your proposal at [[Template talk:Protein]], and then request comment at a couple places (like [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology]] and [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology\/Style guidelines]].) Then if no one objects after a week or so, go ahead and add the field. (If you're not sure how to add the field to the template, I'd be happy to help.) You may also want to get feedback from [[User talk:Diberri]]. I rely upon his excellent [http:\/\/diberri.dyndns.org\/wikipedia\/templates\/?type=pubmed tool] to help create these infoboxes. It probably isn't realistic to expect that a new molecular weight field would be automatically populated by that tool, but perhaps he could add lines with unpopulated values to support the new field(s) you're proposing. -- +++$+++ :I could support adding new fields. I could see some complexities, though, so I'd recommend that you post a message about your proposal at [[Template talk:Protein]], and then request comment at a couple places (like [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology]] and [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology/Style guidelines]].) Then if no one objects after a week or so, go ahead and add the field. (If you're not sure how to add the field to the template, I'd be happy to help.) You may also want to get feedback from [[User talk:Diberri]]. I rely upon his excellent [http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/templates/?type=pubmed tool] to help create these infoboxes. It probably isn't realistic to expect that a new molecular weight field would be automatically populated by that tool, but perhaps he could add lines with unpopulated values to support the new field(s) you're proposing. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 16:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

524423 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524423 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-21 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.190408640E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For outstanding work in obtaining many high-quality freely-licensed images to illustrate our articles. Great job!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For outstanding work in obtaining many high-quality freely-licensed images to illustrate our articles. Great job! [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 14:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
524424 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524423 +++$+++ 524423 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.190410080E09 +++$+++ Wow. From you that means a lot; [[User:AnonEMouse\/Images|my entire output]] is a slow month for you. :-) I also didn't put claw to camera myself, just did a lot of searching for other people's hard work. Thank you! -- +++$+++ : Wow. From you that means a lot; [[User:AnonEMouse/Images|my entire output]] is a slow month for you. :-) I also didn't put claw to camera myself, just did a lot of searching for other people's hard work. Thank you! --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

812 +++$+++ Fox53 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 812 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-20 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.177130220E09 +++$+++ It's all right with the section literature.-- +++$+++ It's all right with the section literature.--[[User:Fox53|Fox53]] 21:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
813 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 812 +++$+++ 812 +++$+++ 2007-04-21 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.177140000E09 +++$+++ :) !  +++$+++ : :) ! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 00:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
814 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 812 +++$+++ 812 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.176855600E09 +++$+++ So, you're Fox53 now? Looks like some decent work on ice hockey clubs so far. Have fun, be cool.  +++$+++ :So, you're Fox53 now? Looks like some decent work on ice hockey clubs so far. Have fun, be cool. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 17:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

815 +++$+++ 141.76.177.36 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-03 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.175632440E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:141.76.177.36|141.76.177.36]] 13:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
816 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 815 +++$+++ 815 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.175634360E09 +++$+++ And do me a favor by not adding unnecessary tags to articles I have edited. While the articles may need sourcing tagging something just because I edited it is counter-productive and is a waste of everyone's time. Go out there and be a good, productive editor.  +++$+++ :And do me a favor by not adding unnecessary tags to articles I have edited. While the articles may need sourcing tagging something just because I edited it is counter-productive and is a waste of everyone's time. Go out there and be a good, productive editor. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 14:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
817 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 815 +++$+++ 816 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.175634960E09 +++$+++ P.S. if you have a link to current information about Pepe and the legal status of the logo (I see you've marked the item as 2007) please post it so eveyone can have a look.  +++$+++ ::P.S. if you have a link to current information about Pepe and the legal status of the logo (I see you've marked the item as 2007) please post it so eveyone can have a look. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 14:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

819 +++$+++ ChrisTheDude +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.169139420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:ChrisTheDude|ChrisTheDude]] 08:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
820 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 819 +++$+++ 819 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.169155140E09 +++$+++ The image file is part of [[Wikipedia Commons]] and can't be directly replaced. I've uploaded a new file to Commons which includes the proper transparent background in quadrants 2&3 and made a request to have the bad file replaced with that. Dunno how long it takes, up to the admins over there now, so stay tuned.  +++$+++ :The image file is part of [[Wikipedia Commons]] and can't be directly replaced. I've uploaded a new file to Commons which includes the proper transparent background in quadrants 2&3 and made a request to have the bad file replaced with that. Dunno how long it takes, up to the admins over there now, so stay tuned. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 13:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
821 +++$+++ ChrisTheDude +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 819 +++$+++ 820 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.169160360E09 +++$+++ Cheers!!!!!  +++$+++ ::Cheers!!!!! [[User:ChrisTheDude|ChrisTheDude]] 14:46, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

525108 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525108 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-06 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.157609820E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 23:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
525109 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525108 +++$+++ 525108 +++$+++ 2006-09-10 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.157891040E09 +++$+++ I'd encourage you to (1) [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|get an account]], and then (2) [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|be bold]] in improving [[Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy]]. If you have any more specific questions, of course I'd be happy to answer (though you may also want to ask at [[Talk:Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy]] or [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine]].) -- +++$+++ :I'd encourage you to (1) [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|get an account]], and then (2) [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|be bold]] in improving [[Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy]]. If you have any more specific questions, of course I'd be happy to answer (though you may also want to ask at [[Talk:Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy]] or [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine]].) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 05:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

262965 +++$+++ ImperfectlyInformed +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-13 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.216009140E09 +++$+++ It's not my lecture. It's the Can Fam Physic's lecture. I don't see much wrong with that diff. The sourcing to references which back up those statements? I'll admit that the weight loss should have been more precise by saying \"One study of from mice suggests that coconut oil cuts bodyfat more than soy oil\" -- which is how I would do it now, or perhaps I wouldn't add that one now, as it is a somewhat technical primary study. But it seems a minor issue. You should consider analyzing arguments for their own merit or lack thereof, rather than focusing on the source. Commenting on the source is generally considered bad etiquette, and is unnecessary in this case. It is also poor reasoning, except in cases where, as someone without technical expertise, you must rely on credibility (e.g. the global warming debate, for most of us). This isn't one of those cases.  +++$+++ It's not my lecture. It's the Can Fam Physic's lecture. I don't see much wrong with that diff. The sourcing to references which back up those statements? I'll admit that the weight loss should have been more precise by saying "One study of from mice suggests that coconut oil cuts bodyfat more than soy oil" -- which is how I would do it now, or perhaps I wouldn't add that one now, as it is a somewhat technical primary study. But it seems a minor issue. You should consider analyzing arguments for their own merit or lack thereof, rather than focusing on the source. Commenting on the source is generally considered bad etiquette, and is unnecessary in this case. It is also poor reasoning, except in cases where, as someone without technical expertise, you must rely on credibility (e.g. the global warming debate, for most of us). This isn't one of those cases. [[User:ImperfectlyInformed|<span style="font-family: Times">II</span>]] | ([[User_talk:ImperfectlyInformed|t]] - [[Special:Contributions/ImperfectlyInformed|c]]) 21:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
262966 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262965 +++$+++ 262965 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.216012740E09 +++$+++ I am disappointed you see nothing wrong with that edit. It is just the sort of misuse of primary sources that WP:MEDRS aims to avoid.  +++$+++ :I am disappointed you see nothing wrong with that edit. It is just the sort of misuse of primary sources that WP:MEDRS aims to avoid. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
262967 +++$+++ ImperfectlyInformed +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262965 +++$+++ 262966 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.216024260E09 +++$+++ When I say source, I mean person. You're assuming bad faith and commenting on the person, when you could just comment on arguments. I agree the arguments around reviews are getting repetitive at this point. As far as those studies, I'll admit that I read them hastily, and like I said, at this point I may not have cited the first one at all. After reading the second one closer, I may not have cited it at this point either, and I certainly would have worded it much more precisely and tentatively. I've learned a lot about medical articles in the past couple months -- at that point I had not looked at MEDRS. I'm not yet convinced that these points do not belong in the article, but I could see a strong case being made. Coconut oil is an area where there is relatively little literature. Typing \"coconut oil\" in PubMed yields only 20 reviews. [http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/6354008 One is on its hypoallergic status], [http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/3519928 another solidifies its heart benefits], [http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/1345319 this one is fairly broad], [http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/7977143 and another broad one].  +++$+++ ::When I say source, I mean person. You're assuming bad faith and commenting on the person, when you could just comment on arguments. I agree the arguments around reviews are getting repetitive at this point. As far as those studies, I'll admit that I read them hastily, and like I said, at this point I may not have cited the first one at all. After reading the second one closer, I may not have cited it at this point either, and I certainly would have worded it much more precisely and tentatively. I've learned a lot about medical articles in the past couple months -- at that point I had not looked at MEDRS. I'm not yet convinced that these points do not belong in the article, but I could see a strong case being made. Coconut oil is an area where there is relatively little literature. Typing "coconut oil" in PubMed yields only 20 reviews. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6354008 One is on its hypoallergic status], [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3519928 another solidifies its heart benefits], [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1345319 this one is fairly broad], [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7977143 and another broad one]. [[User:ImperfectlyInformed|<span style="font-family: Times">II</span>]] | ([[User_talk:ImperfectlyInformed|t]] - [[Special:Contributions/ImperfectlyInformed|c]]) 01:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
262968 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262965 +++$+++ 262967 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.216053960E09 +++$+++ No, you are not merely a messenger passing on someone else's authoratative advice. Look at what you wrote: \"I'm left with suspicions of bias\", \"I don't think we should\", \"We can't be making these assumptions\", \"Earlier I pointed out that this review [12] was biased\", \"I doubt that this biased\", \"it seems to me a \"redflag\" for bias\", \"you should be using\". It is abundantly clear that you are giving your own personal opinion, and are not presenting it in any humble way. You are writing as though ''your'' advice is worth considering and yet your actions (such as the diff) make it abundantly clear that you either don't understand or choose not to follow the existing advice in MEDRS, or indeed [[WP:V]]. One has to wonder what exactly you are trying to achieve with the drawn-out discussion. Are you seeking advice or giving it?  +++$+++ :::No, you are not merely a messenger passing on someone else's authoratative advice. Look at what you wrote: "I'm left with suspicions of bias", "I don't think we should", "We can't be making these assumptions", "Earlier I pointed out that this review [12] was biased", "I doubt that this biased", "it seems to me a "redflag" for bias", "you should be using". It is abundantly clear that you are giving your own personal opinion, and are not presenting it in any humble way. You are writing as though ''your'' advice is worth considering and yet your actions (such as the diff) make it abundantly clear that you either don't understand or choose not to follow the existing advice in MEDRS, or indeed [[WP:V]]. One has to wonder what exactly you are trying to achieve with the drawn-out discussion. Are you seeking advice or giving it? [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 09:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
262969 +++$+++ ImperfectlyInformed +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262965 +++$+++ 262968 +++$+++ 2008-07-16 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.216193460E09 +++$+++ Did you bother to read what I said? When I made that edit, I hadn't even read MEDRS. That was probably the first medical-related edit I ever made. Since then I've introduced probably a dozen or so up-to-date systematic reviews into various articles.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Health_issues_and_effects_of_cannabis&diff=225148530&oldid=225147517][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Coeliac_disease&diff=221777736&oldid=221758603][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Coeliac_disease&diff=220117534&oldid=220072635][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Coeliac_disease&diff=219042080&oldid=218821666][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Phthalate&diff=223425827&oldid=223332326] I'm getting the impression that you're persisting in your bad faith assumptions and refusing to read what I'm typing. As far as advice: I'm certainly not exclusively looking to give or take advice. I give advice when I think it needs to be given and I take it when it is good. I don't fight good advice. I appreciate your feedback on my edit, but assuming those are the sources that I generally cite when I've already said I wouldn't cite them (and certainly not so imprecisely) just seems like you're set in a outdated judgment of me, and you're unwilling to believe me when there's no indication that I shouldn't be believed -- i.e., you're holding some sort of grudge. This is textbook bad faith assumption. As far as what I'm trying to achieve, there's a couple things, which I've stated several times: 1) a preference for systematic reviews; 2) not assuming that a study which does not mention a contradicting study does so because that primary study has methodological problems; this is assuming something that we can't -- further, I think this the exclusion of contradicting studies without mention appears to be evidence of bias, although I'm not going to try and write this in a guideline page; 3) not relying on overly broad reviews when specific reviews are available. I don't understand why there's so much pushback to these concepts, some of which I'm drawing from PMID 8499790. In some cases these are nits -- in general I agree with a preference for more recent reviews, and Eubulides' revised draft looks fine to me, esp. since it took out that \"assume that primary studies not mentioned in a particular review have methodological problems\" clause.  +++$+++ ::::Did you bother to read what I said? When I made that edit, I hadn't even read MEDRS. That was probably the first medical-related edit I ever made. Since then I've introduced probably a dozen or so up-to-date systematic reviews into various articles.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Health_issues_and_effects_of_cannabis&diff=225148530&oldid=225147517][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coeliac_disease&diff=221777736&oldid=221758603][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coeliac_disease&diff=220117534&oldid=220072635][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coeliac_disease&diff=219042080&oldid=218821666][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phthalate&diff=223425827&oldid=223332326] I'm getting the impression that you're persisting in your bad faith assumptions and refusing to read what I'm typing. As far as advice: I'm certainly not exclusively looking to give or take advice. I give advice when I think it needs to be given and I take it when it is good. I don't fight good advice. I appreciate your feedback on my edit, but assuming those are the sources that I generally cite when I've already said I wouldn't cite them (and certainly not so imprecisely) just seems like you're set in a outdated judgment of me, and you're unwilling to believe me when there's no indication that I shouldn't be believed -- i.e., you're holding some sort of grudge. This is textbook bad faith assumption. As far as what I'm trying to achieve, there's a couple things, which I've stated several times: 1) a preference for systematic reviews; 2) not assuming that a study which does not mention a contradicting study does so because that primary study has methodological problems; this is assuming something that we can't -- further, I think this the exclusion of contradicting studies without mention appears to be evidence of bias, although I'm not going to try and write this in a guideline page; 3) not relying on overly broad reviews when specific reviews are available. I don't understand why there's so much pushback to these concepts, some of which I'm drawing from PMID 8499790. In some cases these are nits -- in general I agree with a preference for more recent reviews, and Eubulides' revised draft looks fine to me, esp. since it took out that "assume that primary studies not mentioned in a particular review have methodological problems" clause. [[User:ImperfectlyInformed|<span style="font-family: Times">II</span>]] | ([[User_talk:ImperfectlyInformed|t]] - [[Special:Contributions/ImperfectlyInformed|c]]) 00:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
262970 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262965 +++$+++ 262969 +++$+++ 2008-07-16 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.216232820E09 +++$+++ Where did Eubulides' draft ever say \"assume that primary studies not mentioned in a particular review have methodological problems\". I can't find it in the diffs. He does (and still does) say that such primary studies are dubious, which simply means they are \"of uncertain quality, intention, or appropriateness\" (Encarta dictionary) -- it doesn't mean they ''are'' bad. Can you supply the diff where the draft said that?  +++$+++ :::::Where did Eubulides' draft ever say "assume that primary studies not mentioned in a particular review have methodological problems". I can't find it in the diffs. He does (and still does) say that such primary studies are dubious, which simply means they are "of uncertain quality, intention, or appropriateness" (Encarta dictionary) -- it doesn't mean they ''are'' bad. Can you supply the diff where the draft said that? [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:27, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
262971 +++$+++ ImperfectlyInformed +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262965 +++$+++ 262970 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.216358100E09 +++$+++ You're right, it does still say that, and I don't agree with it -- it is unnecessary and possibly misleading. Also, I believe that, in accordance with standard scholarly procedure, citing the primary article when a review article is adding no value to it (i.e. it is not citing several primary articles on the issue) is better practice -- you put the reader straight to the source of an assertion, and you don't mislead them into thinking that the review is adding value to a finding, when it is simply reporting a finding. This point, along with an objection to the above clause (which you're right, still exists), were my two major points.  +++$+++ ::::::You're right, it does still say that, and I don't agree with it -- it is unnecessary and possibly misleading. Also, I believe that, in accordance with standard scholarly procedure, citing the primary article when a review article is adding no value to it (i.e. it is not citing several primary articles on the issue) is better practice -- you put the reader straight to the source of an assertion, and you don't mislead them into thinking that the review is adding value to a finding, when it is simply reporting a finding. This point, along with an objection to the above clause (which you're right, still exists), were my two major points. [[User:ImperfectlyInformed|<span style="font-family: Times">II</span>]] | ([[User_talk:ImperfectlyInformed|t]] - [[Special:Contributions/ImperfectlyInformed|c]]) 22:15, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
262972 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262965 +++$+++ 262971 +++$+++ 2008-07-18 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.216394400E09 +++$+++ The purpose of scholarly citations and the purpose of citations on Wikipedia are completely different. In the first, you have one expert communicating with another expert, indicating the root source of the information, and giving credit for its discovery where appropriate. Citing a review might well indicate laziness on the part of the scholar, but there are other reasons such as where (as you indicate) the review adds value or where the primary material is in a foreign language or otherwise inaccessible. On Wikipedia, we have the unique problem (not shared by other encyclopaedias, who generally don't cite their sources) where the authors are not regarded as experts. Even if some authors are experts, we have no way of proving this and so cannot rely on the authority of the author. By citing a review, one is saying \"Look, an expert has reviewed the subject and agrees with what the WP article says.\" Even a poor review is a step above \"A Wikipedian has reviewed the subject and thinks we should say X\" as Wikipedians should have no voice at all. The review ''does'' add value: it adds the weight of an expert opinion.  +++$+++ :::::::The purpose of scholarly citations and the purpose of citations on Wikipedia are completely different. In the first, you have one expert communicating with another expert, indicating the root source of the information, and giving credit for its discovery where appropriate. Citing a review might well indicate laziness on the part of the scholar, but there are other reasons such as where (as you indicate) the review adds value or where the primary material is in a foreign language or otherwise inaccessible. On Wikipedia, we have the unique problem (not shared by other encyclopaedias, who generally don't cite their sources) where the authors are not regarded as experts. Even if some authors are experts, we have no way of proving this and so cannot rely on the authority of the author. By citing a review, one is saying "Look, an expert has reviewed the subject and agrees with what the WP article says." Even a poor review is a step above "A Wikipedian has reviewed the subject and thinks we should say X" as Wikipedians should have no voice at all. The review ''does'' add value: it adds the weight of an expert opinion. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 08:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
262973 +++$+++ ImperfectlyInformed +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262965 +++$+++ 262972 +++$+++ 2008-07-18 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.216398180E09 +++$+++ ''Update'': Of course, WP:RS is a guideline just like MEDRS, so you can ignore my ranting about policies. Nevertheless, I don't think we have this problem of \"not knowing an expert on Wikipedia\" -- yours is the first time I've heard of this. Peer review exists, it works pretty well, and there is little real reason to believe that a reviewer is more of an expert than an original article writer. Of course, it is nice that a reviewer mentions a primary article, but it doesn't signify that the article has been rigorously analyzed; peer review connotes that much more strongly.  +++$+++ ::::::::''Update'': Of course, WP:RS is a guideline just like MEDRS, so you can ignore my ranting about policies. Nevertheless, I don't think we have this problem of "not knowing an expert on Wikipedia" -- yours is the first time I've heard of this. Peer review exists, it works pretty well, and there is little real reason to believe that a reviewer is more of an expert than an original article writer. Of course, it is nice that a reviewer mentions a primary article, but it doesn't signify that the article has been rigorously analyzed; peer review connotes that much more strongly. [[User:ImperfectlyInformed|<span style="font-family: Times">II</span>]] | ([[User_talk:ImperfectlyInformed|t]] - [[Special:Contributions/ImperfectlyInformed|c]]) 09:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
262974 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262965 +++$+++ 262973 +++$+++ 2008-07-18 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.216409460E09 +++$+++ I going on break now. Please read [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary.2C_and_tertiary_sources]]. Particularly \"Wikipedia articles should rely on reliable, published secondary sources.\" Note the full stop at the end of that sentence. There's not \"but\" or \"except\". Reliable primary sources can be used \"but only with care\". Part of what [[WP:MEDRS]] emphasises is the sort of care and dangers there are using them in medical articles. As for the the \"expert\" problem on Wikipedia, it is fundamental to why we have the three core policies.  If you want a wiki written by experts, try Citizendium.  +++$+++ :::::::::I going on break now. Please read [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary.2C_and_tertiary_sources]]. Particularly "Wikipedia articles should rely on reliable, published secondary sources." Note the full stop at the end of that sentence. There's not "but" or "except". Reliable primary sources can be used "but only with care". Part of what [[WP:MEDRS]] emphasises is the sort of care and dangers there are using them in medical articles. As for the the "expert" problem on Wikipedia, it is fundamental to why we have the three core policies.  If you want a wiki written by experts, try Citizendium. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

822 +++$+++ SportsAddicted +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-29 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.170128520E09 +++$+++ Hey Wiggy!, Thanks for copy-editing some parts of the Feyenoord article already. That's exactly what I was looking for and I'm looking forward to see this happening to the rest of the article as well. I hope you can find the interest in doing this, but with fellow Canadians Jonathan de Guzman and Jacob Lensky playing at the club this hopefully won't be too much of a bother to you. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hey Wiggy!, Thanks for copy-editing some parts of the Feyenoord article already. That's exactly what I was looking for and I'm looking forward to see this happening to the rest of the article as well. I hope you can find the interest in doing this, but with fellow Canadians Jonathan de Guzman and Jacob Lensky playing at the club this hopefully won't be too much of a bother to you. Cheers, [[User:SportsAddicted|'''SportsAddicted''']]</font> | <small><font color="dimgray">[[User talk:SportsAddicted|discuss]]</font></small> 19:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
823 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 822 +++$+++ 822 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.170137700E09 +++$+++ I'm happy to make a contribution. Hope it suits. Thanks.  +++$+++ :I'm happy to make a contribution. Hope it suits. Thanks. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 22:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
824 +++$+++ SportsAddicted +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 822 +++$+++ 823 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.170142920E09 +++$+++ It definately suits. The thing is when I see what I actually should have written I always have the feeling that I could have came up with that as well, but for some reason I don't, so it's always nice to have someone nearby that speaks better English than I do :)  +++$+++ ::It definately suits. The thing is when I see what I actually should have written I always have the feeling that I could have came up with that as well, but for some reason I don't, so it's always nice to have someone nearby that speaks better English than I do :) [[User:SportsAddicted|'''SportsAddicted''']]</font> | <small><font color="dimgray">[[User talk:SportsAddicted|discuss]]</font></small> 23:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
825 +++$+++ SportsAddicted +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 822 +++$+++ 824 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.170226800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for another round of copy-editing. I did however see you changed 1-0 and 5-2 into 1:0 and 5:2, which is not a common way to print a result. I know this is done in Germany, but as far as I know nowhere else in the world. I also removed the \"by fans\" part as everybody nicknames the stadium like that... fans, team members, press, fans\/players\/members from other teams as well as whoever you can think of.  +++$+++ :::Thanks for another round of copy-editing. I did however see you changed 1-0 and 5-2 into 1:0 and 5:2, which is not a common way to print a result. I know this is done in Germany, but as far as I know nowhere else in the world. I also removed the "by fans" part as everybody nicknames the stadium like that... fans, team members, press, fans/players/members from other teams as well as whoever you can think of. [[User:SportsAddicted|'''SportsAddicted''']]</font> | <small><font color="dimgray">[[User talk:SportsAddicted|discuss]]</font></small> 23:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
826 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 822 +++$+++ 825 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.170229800E09 +++$+++ Okay. I see it's moving along and a number of folks are chipping in. This is good.  +++$+++ ::::Okay. I see it's moving along and a number of folks are chipping in. This is good. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 23:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
827 +++$+++ SportsAddicted +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 822 +++$+++ 826 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.170255480E09 +++$+++ That's right, the more people are on it, the better the article eventually will be.  +++$+++ :::::That's right, the more people are on it, the better the article eventually will be. [[User:SportsAddicted|'''SportsAddicted''']]</font> | <small><font color="dimgray">[[User talk:SportsAddicted|discuss]]</font></small> 06:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

525112 +++$+++ UnseemlyWeasel +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-10 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.157944920E09 +++$+++ A quick thank you for originating the [[Leopard syndrome]] article. As you can see I have worked hard on the expansion of it, and certainly appreciate the fact that it was here. Strange but true coincidence, the day you initiated the article is my birthday! I do happen to have been diagnosed with the condition in 1987 with the condition, my father was retro-diagnosed from me, and my daughter recieved a confirmed diagnosis from the test they have now. +++$+++ A quick thank you for originating the [[Leopard syndrome]] article. As you can see I have worked hard on the expansion of it, and certainly appreciate the fact that it was here. Strange but true coincidence, the day you initiated the article is my birthday! I do happen to have been diagnosed with the condition in 1987 with the condition, my father was retro-diagnosed from me, and my daughter recieved a confirmed diagnosis from the test they have now.[[User:UnseemlyWeasel|UnseemlyWeasel]] 20:22, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
525113 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525112 +++$+++ 525112 +++$+++ 2006-09-10 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.157946480E09 +++$+++ I am happy that my contribution was of use, and pleased that you've done so much to improve the article. Congratulations on getting the article promoted. -- +++$+++ :I am happy that my contribution was of use, and pleased that you've done so much to improve the article. Congratulations on getting the article promoted. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 20:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

611807 +++$+++ Tohru Honda13 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-04 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.170656100E09 +++$+++ Wow, I admire your creativity! When it's done, I think I'd like to join. For now, would it be okay if I helped you build it or something? Looks like fun :P and I'm always up to a challenge. Or, if you just need some minor help, I'm always available. Cheers! &mdash; <span style=\"color:#ff0000\">\u2665<\/span> +++$+++ Wow, I admire your creativity! When it's done, I think I'd like to join. For now, would it be okay if I helped you build it or something? Looks like fun :P and I'm always up to a challenge. Or, if you just need some minor help, I'm always available. Cheers! &mdash; <span style="color:#ff0000">♥</span>[[User:Tohru Honda13|<span style="color:#ff1493">'''Tohru Honda13'''</span>]]<span style="color:#ff0000">♥</span> 22:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
611808 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611807 +++$+++ 611807 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.170659280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the nice comments, Tohru-san (but, to be honest, the project is pretty much a copied-and-pasted version of [[WP:DBZ]] ;). Feel free to add anything you think would help the project; I'm open to any ideas and I'll gladly accept anyone's help. \/\/  +++$+++ :Thanks for the nice comments, Tohru-san (but, to be honest, the project is pretty much a copied-and-pasted version of [[WP:DBZ]] ;). Feel free to add anything you think would help the project; I'm open to any ideas and I'll gladly accept anyone's help. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Poetic'''''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Poetic Decay|<font color="purple">'''''Decay'''''</font>]] 23:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

828 +++$+++ FootyStavros +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-10 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.171099140E09 +++$+++ How do you make kit patterns that use [[Template:Football kit]] ?    +++$+++ How do you make kit patterns that use [[Template:Football kit]] ?   [[User:FootyStavros|FootyStavros]] 01:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
829 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 828 +++$+++ 828 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.171102860E09 +++$+++ If the image uses an existing pattern I use Adobe Photoshop to change colours, do horizontal flips, move patterns from one image to another, etc. If I am making an image from scratch I use something like CorelDraw to create a new pattern and export it as a .png when its ready to go (just because I'm a regular CorelDraw user and can easily make it do what I want) and tune it up in Photoshop if I have to. There are other .png editors out there (including some freebies) that'll do the job as well. MS Paint will let you edit .pngs as well, real simple to use, but doesn't handle the transparent backgrounds that some kit images use. Hope that gives you a few clues. I imagine other folks have their own favorite apps for the job. You're trying to put together your own kit I assume? What club? (Good luck with it)  +++$+++ :If the image uses an existing pattern I use Adobe Photoshop to change colours, do horizontal flips, move patterns from one image to another, etc. If I am making an image from scratch I use something like CorelDraw to create a new pattern and export it as a .png when its ready to go (just because I'm a regular CorelDraw user and can easily make it do what I want) and tune it up in Photoshop if I have to. There are other .png editors out there (including some freebies) that'll do the job as well. MS Paint will let you edit .pngs as well, real simple to use, but doesn't handle the transparent backgrounds that some kit images use. Hope that gives you a few clues. I imagine other folks have their own favorite apps for the job. You're trying to put together your own kit I assume? What club? (Good luck with it) [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 02:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

525117 +++$+++ AED +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-21 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.158836940E09 +++$+++ I don't know if I've ever mentioned it, but I wanted to thank you for your good work on the disease infoboxes! Cheers! - +++$+++ I don't know if I've ever mentioned it, but I wanted to thank you for your good work on the disease infoboxes! Cheers! -[[User:AED|AED]] 04:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
525118 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525117 +++$+++ 525117 +++$+++ 2006-09-22 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.158915360E09 +++$+++ Thank you! -- +++$+++ :Thank you! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

830 +++$+++ FootyStavros +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 830 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-12 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.171348380E09 +++$+++ How do I make this image into a .png? I can't send any images to Adobe photoshop either.  +++$+++ How do I make this image into a .png? I can't send any images to Adobe photoshop either. [[User:FootyStavros|FootyStavros]] 22:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
831 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 830 +++$+++ 830 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.171350660E09 +++$+++ What software are you using for your work? It may just come down to developing some familiarity with the file functions of Photoshop (or whatever else it may be that you are using).  +++$+++ :What software are you using for your work? It may just come down to developing some familiarity with the file functions of Photoshop (or whatever else it may be that you are using). [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 23:11, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

525119 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525119 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-21 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.158878820E09 +++$+++ Not sure if you've been following [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drugs|the Drugs talk]], but I just [[WP:BOLD]]ly \"created\" a navbox for bisphosphonates using the code from [[Template:Antiarrhythmic agents]]. In light of the excellent work you've done on drug navboxes and my complete ignorance of template syntax, I'd like you to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drugs#Bisphosphonates|have a look at it]]. Comments, criticism and raging accusations of plagiarism welcome :)  +++$+++ Not sure if you've been following [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drugs|the Drugs talk]], but I just [[WP:BOLD]]ly "created" a navbox for bisphosphonates using the code from [[Template:Antiarrhythmic agents]]. In light of the excellent work you've done on drug navboxes and my complete ignorance of template syntax, I'd like you to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drugs#Bisphosphonates|have a look at it]]. Comments, criticism and raging accusations of plagiarism welcome :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 15:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
525120 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525119 +++$+++ 525119 +++$+++ 2006-09-22 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.158918660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the kind words. Main response at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Drugs#Bisphosphonates]]. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the kind words. Main response at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Drugs#Bisphosphonates]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 02:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
525121 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525119 +++$+++ 525120 +++$+++ 2006-09-22 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.158954180E09 +++$+++ Thank you!  +++$+++ ::Thank you! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 12:43, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

832 +++$+++ FootyStavros +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-12 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.171351440E09 +++$+++ Well, I figured out how to do it. THANKS ALOT WIGGY.  +++$+++ Well, I figured out how to do it. THANKS ALOT WIGGY. [[User:FootyStavros|FootyStavros]] 23:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
833 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 832 +++$+++ 832 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.171351860E09 +++$+++ Woohoo! Congratulations.  +++$+++ :Woohoo! Congratulations. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 23:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

262977 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-24 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.216939200E09 +++$+++ I seem to recall offering to vectorize two charts for [[Ketogenic diet]]... and than I ''completely forgot.'' I am really, really sorry\u2014but [[:Image:Ketogenic diets pie.svg|here's the first one]]! :)  +++$+++ I seem to recall offering to vectorize two charts for [[Ketogenic diet]]... and than I ''completely forgot.'' I am really, really sorry—but [[:Image:Ketogenic diets pie.svg|here's the first one]]! :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 15:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
262978 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262977 +++$+++ 262977 +++$+++ 2008-07-24 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.216939260E09 +++$+++ By the way, [[Trebuchet MS]] doesn't render, so I switched it to [[Bitstream Vera Sans]] (not the same, but cuts down on the file size). If you'd rather keep Trebuchet, let me know and I'll convert the text to paths and upload a new version.  +++$+++ :By the way, [[Trebuchet MS]] doesn't render, so I switched it to [[Bitstream Vera Sans]] (not the same, but cuts down on the file size). If you'd rather keep Trebuchet, let me know and I'll convert the text to paths and upload a new version. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 15:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
262979 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262977 +++$+++ 262977 +++$+++ 2008-07-25 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.217046180E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Fvasconcellos. I've changed over to it. I don't have a strong opinion on the font other than it should be clear.  +++$+++ :Thanks, Fvasconcellos. I've changed over to it. I don't have a strong opinion on the font other than it should be clear. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:23, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

834 +++$+++ FootyStavros +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 834 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-15 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.171604760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:FootyStavros|FootyStavros]] 21:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
835 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 834 +++$+++ 834 +++$+++ 2007-02-15 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.171605540E09 +++$+++ I've fixed your arms and will do the body as well.  +++$+++ :I've fixed your arms and will do the body as well. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 21:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

836 +++$+++ FootyStavros +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 836 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-17 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.171704060E09 +++$+++ Can you fix this then? It's the real one.  +++$+++ Can you fix this then? It's the real one. [[User:FootyStavros|FootyStavros]] 01:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
837 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 836 +++$+++ 836 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.171704960E09 +++$+++ Done. Saved as _thingoldsides rather than thingoldsidess to match standard naming convention.  +++$+++ :Done. Saved as _thingoldsides rather than thingoldsidess to match standard naming convention. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 01:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

262981 +++$+++ Figureskatingfan +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262981 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-27 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.217209080E09 +++$+++ I wonder, though, if we should go ahead and separate the list like the polio list, into occupations.  I wanted to get your input.  Please excuse my boldness; if I've overstepped by being too aggressive in my removals\/deletions, please correct them.  I'm looking forward to working with you on this article's improvements, since I tend to take on projects all by my lonesome. -- +++$+++ I wonder, though, if we should go ahead and separate the list like the polio list, into occupations.  I wanted to get your input.  Please excuse my boldness; if I've overstepped by being too aggressive in my removals/deletions, please correct them.  I'm looking forward to working with you on this article's improvements, since I tend to take on projects all by my lonesome. --[[User:Figureskatingfan|Figureskatingfan]] ([[User talk:Figureskatingfan|talk]]) 18:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
262982 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262981 +++$+++ 262981 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.217223840E09 +++$+++ I agree that the list isn't long enough for FL, especially when you consider it affects so many people. Possibly, the only way to satisfy the \"Comprehensive\" requirement is to clarify that it includes only people whose Hep C status is on public record (rather than merely \"known\"). I haven't spent anything like the time on this list as I did on the other FLs. The polio list was a good collaboration: we created a list of candidates on the talk page based on unreliable sources\/searches (IMDB, Wikipedia, other lists) and then worked through them finding reliable sources. Don't restrict yourself to Google searches: try Google Books and the online newspapers' own search tools. If the list is to grow, then a split into occupations would be useful. Up to you if you want to do it now and be prepared to revise the groupings as it grows.  +++$+++ :I agree that the list isn't long enough for FL, especially when you consider it affects so many people. Possibly, the only way to satisfy the "Comprehensive" requirement is to clarify that it includes only people whose Hep C status is on public record (rather than merely "known"). I haven't spent anything like the time on this list as I did on the other FLs. The polio list was a good collaboration: we created a list of candidates on the talk page based on unreliable sources/searches (IMDB, Wikipedia, other lists) and then worked through them finding reliable sources. Don't restrict yourself to Google searches: try Google Books and the online newspapers' own search tools. If the list is to grow, then a split into occupations would be useful. Up to you if you want to do it now and be prepared to revise the groupings as it grows. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

838 +++$+++ DevSolar +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 838 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-12 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.171317780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your rewrite of the article. Please tell me if my English was actually bad, as I'm always working toward improving it. I will accept \"rivalry\", although it ''is'' an animosity. ;)  +++$+++ Thanks for your rewrite of the article. Please tell me if my English was actually bad, as I'm always working toward improving it. I will accept "rivalry", although it ''is'' an animosity. ;) [[User:DevSolar|DevSolar]] 14:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
839 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 838 +++$+++ 838 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.171319640E09 +++$+++ Your English looks to be quite good. \"Animosity\" is fine by me, I had toned it down some without really knowing how much of a hate on there was between the two groups of fans. I'd also be more inclined to include the highlights as part of the general history section just as a matter of narrative flow, but that's just my approach. I take it that you are a Verl fan? How is your side doing this year?  +++$+++ :Your English looks to be quite good. "Animosity" is fine by me, I had toned it down some without really knowing how much of a hate on there was between the two groups of fans. I'd also be more inclined to include the highlights as part of the general history section just as a matter of narrative flow, but that's just my approach. I take it that you are a Verl fan? How is your side doing this year? [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 14:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
840 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 838 +++$+++ 838 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.171319700E09 +++$+++ You wouldn't happen to have a club logo image handy, would you?  +++$+++ :You wouldn't happen to have a club logo image handy, would you? [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 14:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
841 +++$+++ DevSolar +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 838 +++$+++ 840 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.171384020E09 +++$+++ Club logo is tricky. There are lots and lots around on the 'net (like, at the top of http:\/\/www.scverl.de), but I couldn't solve the copyright issue sufficiently for any of them to dare a Wikipedia upload. :-(  +++$+++ ::Club logo is tricky. There are lots and lots around on the 'net (like, at the top of http://www.scverl.de), but I couldn't solve the copyright issue sufficiently for any of them to dare a Wikipedia upload. :-( [[User:DevSolar|DevSolar]] 08:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
842 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 838 +++$+++ 838 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.171396800E09 +++$+++ It's okay, I found one. The use of a sports logo is okay as far as it goes as long it is properly tagged <nowiki>{{logo}} or {{sports-logo}}<\/nowiki> when uploaded\/posted. Maybe the goings-ons on in Sachsen will help cool off the fans. Only a point out with a game in hand is looking good. Still a dozen games or so to go? If your guys can keep that up you have a good chance at moving up. Good luck. Go Verl!  +++$+++ :It's okay, I found one. The use of a sports logo is okay as far as it goes as long it is properly tagged <nowiki>{{logo}} or {{sports-logo}}</nowiki> when uploaded/posted. Maybe the goings-ons on in Sachsen will help cool off the fans. Only a point out with a game in hand is looking good. Still a dozen games or so to go? If your guys can keep that up you have a good chance at moving up. Good luck. Go Verl! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 12:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
843 +++$+++ DevSolar +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 838 +++$+++ 842 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.171399320E09 +++$+++ Nah, so far things stopped short of \"real\" violence. That's what I meant with \"any more of it...\". ;-) Twenty games to go. If you're really interested, check the German wikipedia entry, or the [http:\/\/www.bundesligaforen.de\/thread.php?threadid=746 statistics thread] in the fan forum. The moving up ''this'' year would be rather crucial... next year the 3rd Bundesliga will be formed, meaning that clubs still in the Oberliga (IV) by then only have a chance for qualifying for the new Regionalliga (then-IV) or staying in the Oberliga (then-V), while teams already in Regionalliga (III) have a (really good) chance for qualifying for 3rd Bundesliga (then-III), and ''cannot'' be relegated from Regionalliga (then-IV)...  +++$+++ ::Nah, so far things stopped short of "real" violence. That's what I meant with "any more of it...". ;-) Twenty games to go. If you're really interested, check the German wikipedia entry, or the [http://www.bundesligaforen.de/thread.php?threadid=746 statistics thread] in the fan forum. The moving up ''this'' year would be rather crucial... next year the 3rd Bundesliga will be formed, meaning that clubs still in the Oberliga (IV) by then only have a chance for qualifying for the new Regionalliga (then-IV) or staying in the Oberliga (then-V), while teams already in Regionalliga (III) have a (really good) chance for qualifying for 3rd Bundesliga (then-III), and ''cannot'' be relegated from Regionalliga (then-IV)... [[User:DevSolar|DevSolar]] 12:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
844 +++$+++ 217.95.134.211 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 838 +++$+++ 842 +++$+++ 2007-05-13 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.179093360E09 +++$+++ WE DID IT! :-D  +++$+++ ::WE DID IT! :-D [[User:217.95.134.211|217.95.134.211]] 14:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
845 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 838 +++$+++ 844 +++$+++ 2007-05-13 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.179101640E09 +++$+++ Well done and congratulations! Time now for the bigger fish. Go get 'em! Here's to another successful season in 2007-08.  +++$+++ :::Well done and congratulations! Time now for the bigger fish. Go get 'em! Here's to another successful season in 2007-08. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 17:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

262983 +++$+++ Figureskatingfan +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-04 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.217859180E09 +++$+++ Colin, I've made some major changes to the article: I've reorganized the list into categories, removed some unnecessary images, and expanded the lead.  Please let me know what you think, or if I've fracked up the whole thing. ;) -- +++$+++ Colin, I've made some major changes to the article: I've reorganized the list into categories, removed some unnecessary images, and expanded the lead.  Please let me know what you think, or if I've fracked up the whole thing. ;) --[[User:Figureskatingfan|Figureskatingfan]] ([[User talk:Figureskatingfan|talk]]) 07:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
262984 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262983 +++$+++ 262983 +++$+++ 2008-08-07 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.218154080E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the delay. I've not been on WP for a week. The changes are good. I've revised the lead a little. You'll need to make sure it is reliably sourced with citations for each fact. There are three names that are either unlinked or redlinked. You'll need to create articles\/stubs for those or else drop them as non-notable. I think the Kansas City Star external link probably fails our [[WP:EL]] policy as it doesn't add anything a featured article would contain, and isn't as accurate as this one. Keep looking for reliably sourced entries as the biggest problem I think you'll have at FL is the perception that it isn't comprehensive. I'm afraid I just don't have any significant time for WP at the moment.  +++$+++ :Sorry for the delay. I've not been on WP for a week. The changes are good. I've revised the lead a little. You'll need to make sure it is reliably sourced with citations for each fact. There are three names that are either unlinked or redlinked. You'll need to create articles/stubs for those or else drop them as non-notable. I think the Kansas City Star external link probably fails our [[WP:EL]] policy as it doesn't add anything a featured article would contain, and isn't as accurate as this one. Keep looking for reliably sourced entries as the biggest problem I think you'll have at FL is the perception that it isn't comprehensive. I'm afraid I just don't have any significant time for WP at the moment. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 17:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
262985 +++$+++ Figureskatingfan +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262983 +++$+++ 262984 +++$+++ 2008-08-07 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.218155760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for replying in the midst of your busyness.  I'll take over the work on this article, so don't worry, although I may come back if I need additional assistance.  No pressure! ;) -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for replying in the midst of your busyness.  I'll take over the work on this article, so don't worry, although I may come back if I need additional assistance.  No pressure! ;) --[[User:Figureskatingfan|Figureskatingfan]] ([[User talk:Figureskatingfan|talk]]) 17:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

524428 +++$+++ WebHamster +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-24 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.190620980E09 +++$+++ Many thanks to taking the time to rate these pages, it's much appreciated. I've added a slew of references to the [[Mo Foster]] page and I'm in talks with him about getting a PD image (he needs to talk to the photographer first). Many thanks ----  +++$+++ Many thanks to taking the time to rate these pages, it's much appreciated. I've added a slew of references to the [[Mo Foster]] page and I'm in talks with him about getting a PD image (he needs to talk to the photographer first). Many thanks ---- [[User:WebHamster|<font color="#000000">'''W'''eb'''H'''amste</font><font color="#0000ff">r</font>]] 01:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
524429 +++$+++ WebHamster +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524428 +++$+++ 524428 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.191365040E09 +++$+++ Sorry to impose on your valuable time, but as you did the first assessment on [[Mo Foster]] I thought it might be possible that you could re-assess the article? I've added much more info and a lot of references, though the free use photo still remains elusive. I think it stands a chance at a B rating now (though I won't argue at a GA heheheh). I wonder also could you give me some advice on what would be needed to get this article further up the ratings still? Eventually I would like to aim for an A, though I rather doubt I could manage an FA as although Mo is important in his field I rather doubt that he is in a worldwide\/Wikipedia setting. Many thanks. ----  +++$+++ : Sorry to impose on your valuable time, but as you did the first assessment on [[Mo Foster]] I thought it might be possible that you could re-assess the article? I've added much more info and a lot of references, though the free use photo still remains elusive. I think it stands a chance at a B rating now (though I won't argue at a GA heheheh). I wonder also could you give me some advice on what would be needed to get this article further up the ratings still? Eventually I would like to aim for an A, though I rather doubt I could manage an FA as although Mo is important in his field I rather doubt that he is in a worldwide/Wikipedia setting. Many thanks. ---- [[User:WebHamster|<font color="#000000">'''W'''eb'''H'''amste</font><font color="#0000ff">r</font>]] 15:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
524430 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524428 +++$+++ 524429 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.191366600E09 +++$+++ B it is, a few more comments on the [[Talk:Mo_Foster#Assessment]] section. -- +++$+++ :: B it is, a few more comments on the [[Talk:Mo_Foster#Assessment]] section. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
524431 +++$+++ WebHamster +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524428 +++$+++ 524430 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.191383880E09 +++$+++ Once again many thanks. I've taken all the comments on board.----  +++$+++ :::Once again many thanks. I've taken all the comments on board.---- [[User:WebHamster|<font color="#000000">'''W'''eb'''H'''amste</font><font color="#0000ff">r</font>]] 20:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

262987 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-15 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.218803760E09 +++$+++ A new thread [[Wikipedia talk:MEDRS #Systematic reviews and primary sources]] is about text you put into [[WP:MEDRS #Article type]] when you created MEDRS in 2006. Could you please comment if you have a mind? Thanks.  +++$+++ A new thread [[Wikipedia talk:MEDRS #Systematic reviews and primary sources]] is about text you put into [[WP:MEDRS #Article type]] when you created MEDRS in 2006. Could you please comment if you have a mind? Thanks. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] ([[User talk:Eubulides|talk]]) 05:36, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
262988 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262987 +++$+++ 262987 +++$+++ 2008-08-15 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.218853620E09 +++$+++ I'm reminded that Eubulides wasn't around then, and Colin and I were struggling to get the Medicine participants to tune in to anything.  I still retain a small sting about that, wrt the FA processes :-)   +++$+++ : I'm reminded that Eubulides wasn't around then, and Colin and I were struggling to get the Medicine participants to tune in to anything.  I still retain a small sting about that, wrt the FA processes :-)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:27, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

525132 +++$+++ Notinasnaid +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-18 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.161237540E09 +++$+++ Your revert of [[titin]] seems to go against the spirit of Wikipedia, in that this change has been discussed for some time on the talk page. Please contribute your opinion to the discussion, in the hope that a proper consensus can be reached. Thanks.  +++$+++ Your revert of [[titin]] seems to go against the spirit of Wikipedia, in that this change has been discussed for some time on the talk page. Please contribute your opinion to the discussion, in the hope that a proper consensus can be reached. Thanks. [[User:Notinasnaid|Notinasnaid]] 22:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
525133 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525132 +++$+++ 525132 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.161257880E09 +++$+++ If you are really certain that you want to put a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Titin&diff=82291580&oldid=80353555 189,819 character word] on that page, I won't stand in your way. I will refrain from editing that page for the next 12 months. Have fun. -- +++$+++ :If you are really certain that you want to put a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Titin&diff=82291580&oldid=80353555 189,819 character word] on that page, I won't stand in your way. I will refrain from editing that page for the next 12 months. Have fun. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 04:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
525134 +++$+++ Diberri +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525132 +++$+++ 525132 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.161260100E09 +++$+++ The word does not belong on the page in full. [[Talk:Titin#Removing the full word|Please discuss]]. -- +++$+++ :The word does not belong on the page in full. [[Talk:Titin#Removing the full word|Please discuss]]. --[[User:Diberri|David Iberri]] ([[User talk:Diberri|talk]]) 05:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
525135 +++$+++ Notinasnaid +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525132 +++$+++ 525134 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.161267960E09 +++$+++ I am not taking a position on whether the word belongs there. What I am asking is that Wikipedia procedures be observed.  +++$+++ ::I am not taking a position on whether the word belongs there. What I am asking is that Wikipedia procedures be observed. [[User:Notinasnaid|Notinasnaid]] 07:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
525136 +++$+++ Diberri +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525132 +++$+++ 525135 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.161286380E09 +++$+++ I provided a link to the discussion page to facilitate that process. -- +++$+++ :::I provided a link to the discussion page to facilitate that process. --[[User:Diberri|David Iberri]] ([[User talk:Diberri|talk]]) 12:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

846 +++$+++ Oldelpaso +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.172037540E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For bucketloads of great contributions, particularly in the area of German football, I award you this barnstar.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For bucketloads of great contributions, particularly in the area of German football, I award you this barnstar. [[User:Oldelpaso|Oldelpaso]] 21:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
847 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 846 +++$+++ 846 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.172043900E09 +++$+++ Wow. How cool is that? <blush> Thanks for the notice.  +++$+++ :Wow. How cool is that? <blush> Thanks for the notice. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 23:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
848 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 846 +++$+++ 846 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.172800380E09 +++$+++ As to fixing the article on Nicaragua, I'd maybe go about it a bit more gently. I know it can be a frustrating chore sometimes, but I'm sure that if you work at a bit at a time it without beating up on your fellow contributors that it could be put into decent condition - especially as it sounds like you have something useful to add. Don't get too wound up over it and spend some time building some credibility with the other contributors by making useful incremental edits and - most importantly - by showing them some respect. Calling everyone a dope and bad-mouthing Wikipedia won't get you anywhere and the site can only be as friendly as you help make it. Patience, persistance and politeness.  +++$+++ :As to fixing the article on Nicaragua, I'd maybe go about it a bit more gently. I know it can be a frustrating chore sometimes, but I'm sure that if you work at a bit at a time it without beating up on your fellow contributors that it could be put into decent condition - especially as it sounds like you have something useful to add. Don't get too wound up over it and spend some time building some credibility with the other contributors by making useful incremental edits and - most importantly - by showing them some respect. Calling everyone a dope and bad-mouthing Wikipedia won't get you anywhere and the site can only be as friendly as you help make it. Patience, persistance and politeness. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 17:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

262993 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-26 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.219817400E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Samuel_Johnson&curid=48594&diff=234455056&oldid=234454607 This] removed an additional two schools with a different complaint and was a moment held as important by every major biographer of Johnson. It also gives important detail about how people saw him, and that the previous one was not an isolated incident. The section was also requested by a few readers, so there is no consensus to remove.  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samuel_Johnson&curid=48594&diff=234455056&oldid=234454607 This] removed an additional two schools with a different complaint and was a moment held as important by every major biographer of Johnson. It also gives important detail about how people saw him, and that the previous one was not an isolated incident. The section was also requested by a few readers, so there is no consensus to remove. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 23:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
262994 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262993 +++$+++ 262993 +++$+++ 2008-08-27 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.219826280E09 +++$+++ Sent an email.  +++$+++ :Sent an email. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 01:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
262995 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262993 +++$+++ 262993 +++$+++ 2008-08-27 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.219827180E09 +++$+++ I put up a sample way to mention that the June 1783 incident was brought on by a stroke. I also pointed out where I left out a few other problems (but I feel that these could go on a page devoted to his medical history, especially the more disgusting ones).  +++$+++ :I put up a sample way to mention that the June 1783 incident was brought on by a stroke. I also pointed out where I left out a few other problems (but I feel that these could go on a page devoted to his medical history, especially the more disgusting ones). [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 01:53, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

525138 +++$+++ Bathrobe +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525138 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-25 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.161769680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Bathrobe|Bathrobe]] 02:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
525139 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525138 +++$+++ 525138 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.161770340E09 +++$+++ I happily concede that you are much more knowledgable about the topic than I am, and I encourage you to [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|be bold]], and rewrite and\/or [[Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page|rename]] the article as needed. If you feel the article cannot be redeemed, you may [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|nominate it for deletion]], and I will abstain from the vote. -- +++$+++ :I happily concede that you are much more knowledgable about the topic than I am, and I encourage you to [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|be bold]], and rewrite and/or [[Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page|rename]] the article as needed. If you feel the article cannot be redeemed, you may [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|nominate it for deletion]], and I will abstain from the vote. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 02:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

851 +++$+++ DevSolar +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-16 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.174070700E09 +++$+++ I just noticed that the Abseits Guide, used liberally as external weblink for German soccer clubs, is a bit fuzzy when it comes to the lower German leagues, especially when it gets to which ''tier'' that league was ''at the time'' (quoting only the tier of that league as it is ''today''. It's somewhat excusable, as even the German Wikipedia doesn't give much info on this, and there were (and still are) some regional differences. I just want to mention that the website isn't exactly \"encyclopedic\" in its info. (Just one example: The SC Verl page misses the fact that Landesliga was (IV), not (V), in the 70ies (there was no Oberliga before 1978...)  +++$+++ I just noticed that the Abseits Guide, used liberally as external weblink for German soccer clubs, is a bit fuzzy when it comes to the lower German leagues, especially when it gets to which ''tier'' that league was ''at the time'' (quoting only the tier of that league as it is ''today''. It's somewhat excusable, as even the German Wikipedia doesn't give much info on this, and there were (and still are) some regional differences. I just want to mention that the website isn't exactly "encyclopedic" in its info. (Just one example: The SC Verl page misses the fact that Landesliga was (IV), not (V), in the 70ies (there was no Oberliga before 1978...) [[User:DevSolar|DevSolar]] 11:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
852 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 851 +++$+++ 851 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.174085520E09 +++$+++ I'll typically gnaw at an article for a bit and then walk off and see what comes up in the next fews weeks or months and re-visit if I find new stuff or simply do a review and see if the item stands up. Its great to see folks adding stuff (corrections, new facts, perspective) and watch an article grow.  +++$+++ :I'll typically gnaw at an article for a bit and then walk off and see what comes up in the next fews weeks or months and re-visit if I find new stuff or simply do a review and see if the item stands up. Its great to see folks adding stuff (corrections, new facts, perspective) and watch an article grow. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 15:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

262996 +++$+++ Paul gene +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262996 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-25 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.219671000E09 +++$+++ I apologize. I did not mean to be rude. You are always very polite and reasonable, even when we disagree. My comment was mostly addressed to JFW, who is somewhat forceful (and likes to get personal) in advancing his point of view. I feel that, unfortunately, the current MEDRS version presents only one side of the WP:NOR. One may say that it engages in selective quoting in that respect. The other side - secondary sources are not ''always'' better, and editorial judgment is important - has to be present there explicitly, in my view. This will prevent the abuse of poor quality secondary sources, which happens much more often than one may think.  +++$+++ I apologize. I did not mean to be rude. You are always very polite and reasonable, even when we disagree. My comment was mostly addressed to JFW, who is somewhat forceful (and likes to get personal) in advancing his point of view. I feel that, unfortunately, the current MEDRS version presents only one side of the WP:NOR. One may say that it engages in selective quoting in that respect. The other side - secondary sources are not ''always'' better, and editorial judgment is important - has to be present there explicitly, in my view. This will prevent the abuse of poor quality secondary sources, which happens much more often than one may think. [[User:Paul gene|Paul Gene]] ([[User talk:Paul gene|talk]]) 06:30, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
262997 +++$+++ Paul gene +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262996 +++$+++ 262996 +++$+++ 2008-08-27 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.219825740E09 +++$+++ What would you say about this (in bold are my additions)? - \"A secondary source in medicine summarizes one or more primary or secondary sources, usually to give an overview of the current understanding of a medical topic. '''Most''' review articles and specialist textbooks are examples of secondary sources. A good secondary source from a reputable publisher will be written by an '''independent''' expert in the field and be editorially or peer reviewed. '''Reviews written by authors with clear conflict of interest or based to a significant degree on their original research should be considered primary sources, since the authors are not \"at least one step removed\" from the subject of research as required by the [[WP:NOR]] policy.'''  +++$+++ : What would you say about this (in bold are my additions)? - "A secondary source in medicine summarizes one or more primary or secondary sources, usually to give an overview of the current understanding of a medical topic. '''Most''' review articles and specialist textbooks are examples of secondary sources. A good secondary source from a reputable publisher will be written by an '''independent''' expert in the field and be editorially or peer reviewed. '''Reviews written by authors with clear conflict of interest or based to a significant degree on their original research should be considered primary sources, since the authors are not "at least one step removed" from the subject of research as required by the [[WP:NOR]] policy.''' [[User:Paul gene|Paul Gene]] ([[User talk:Paul gene|talk]]) 01:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

853 +++$+++ Panthdaman +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 853 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-17 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.174122180E09 +++$+++ Great Job you did here so far with all the Club infos. If you need help i'll try to find things. I guess some of the founding clubs are not existing any more especially the ones from Berlin. I will check out what I can find tomorrow. Greetings -- +++$+++ Great Job you did here so far with all the Club infos. If you need help i'll try to find things. I guess some of the founding clubs are not existing any more especially the ones from Berlin. I will check out what I can find tomorrow. Greetings --[[User:Panthdaman|Panth]] 02:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
854 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 853 +++$+++ 853 +++$+++ 2007-03-17 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.174123980E09 +++$+++ Thanks. It has made for an interesting little side project within the context of German football, but I think I'm down to the real tough ones now. I found that a number of the clubs are long gone and so in some cases the available info in the articles is rather thin. In other cases I was surprised to find clubs still among the living. I might have material for one or two others salted away, but that's it for now. Thanks for your interest and I'm looking forward to see what you might come up with. If you can find additional material I'd be quite impressed. Good luck!  +++$+++ :Thanks. It has made for an interesting little side project within the context of German football, but I think I'm down to the real tough ones now. I found that a number of the clubs are long gone and so in some cases the available info in the articles is rather thin. In other cases I was surprised to find clubs still among the living. I might have material for one or two others salted away, but that's it for now. Thanks for your interest and I'm looking forward to see what you might come up with. If you can find additional material I'd be quite impressed. Good luck! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 02:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
855 +++$+++ Panthdaman +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 853 +++$+++ 854 +++$+++ 2007-03-17 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.174162620E09 +++$+++ Ok as i realize this is hard work to find information about the missing Clubs ;) I found a homepage of a Soccer History Museum in Dresden which might help us out with the Dresdner FC 1893. Unfortunately the page seems new and they dont have an email contact yet. Ill keep an eye on that. For Frankfurter FC Germania 1894 i found hints that it might still exist as VfL Germania 1894 but im not sure if it is the same Club and found no Club homepage. The same it is with FC Association 1893 Hamburg which might be the VfL 93 Hamburg e.V. which has a hompage [http:\/\/www.vfl93.de\/]. I might check that as well. -- +++$+++ ::Ok as i realize this is hard work to find information about the missing Clubs ;) I found a homepage of a Soccer History Museum in Dresden which might help us out with the Dresdner FC 1893. Unfortunately the page seems new and they dont have an email contact yet. Ill keep an eye on that. For Frankfurter FC Germania 1894 i found hints that it might still exist as VfL Germania 1894 but im not sure if it is the same Club and found no Club homepage. The same it is with FC Association 1893 Hamburg which might be the VfL 93 Hamburg e.V. which has a hompage [http://www.vfl93.de/]. I might check that as well. --[[User:Panthdaman|Panth]] 13:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
856 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 853 +++$+++ 855 +++$+++ 2007-03-17 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.174165980E09 +++$+++ As I said, its down to the tough stuff now, the cherry picking is over. I'll follow up on the leads you've provided. Thank you and good hunting!  +++$+++ :::As I said, its down to the tough stuff now, the cherry picking is over. I'll follow up on the leads you've provided. Thank you and good hunting! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 14:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
857 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 853 +++$+++ 855 +++$+++ 2007-03-17 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.174166340E09 +++$+++ Well you did it! After your nudge I found a page for VfL Germania 1894 [http:\/\/germania94-jugend.de\/ here]. It's got a clear reference to being the same side that joined the DFB in 1900.  +++$+++ :::Well you did it! After your nudge I found a page for VfL Germania 1894 [http://germania94-jugend.de/ here]. It's got a clear reference to being the same side that joined the DFB in 1900. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 14:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

262999 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262999 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-08 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.220919420E09 +++$+++ Colin, I think you've got a DYK there.  I've never participated, but it can be fun. I guess.  [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost\/2008-05-02\/Dispatches]]   +++$+++ Colin, I think you've got a DYK there.  I've never participated, but it can be fun. I guess.  [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-05-02/Dispatches]]  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
263000 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262999 +++$+++ 262999 +++$+++ 2008-09-08 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.220921820E09 +++$+++ As one of Wikipedia's least prolific editors, DYK wasn't a game I thought I could play. Looks like the body text (two paragraphs) is just shy of the 1500 characters needed. Hmm, maybe it will grow a little.  +++$+++ :As one of Wikipedia's least prolific editors, DYK wasn't a game I thought I could play. Looks like the body text (two paragraphs) is just shy of the 1500 characters needed. Hmm, maybe it will grow a little. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 17:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
263001 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262999 +++$+++ 263000 +++$+++ 2008-09-08 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.220922900E09 +++$+++ I think you've got five days.  Maybe Ottava will help; he plays the DYK game.  It gets an interesting hook on the main page, at least that's what I hear.  Had i tuned in to DYK earlier, I could have put a lot of interesting stuff on the main page in the olden days (er, when I still had time to create content :\/ )   +++$+++ :: I think you've got five days.  Maybe Ottava will help; he plays the DYK game.  It gets an interesting hook on the main page, at least that's what I hear.  Had i tuned in to DYK earlier, I could have put a lot of interesting stuff on the main page in the olden days (er, when I still had time to create content :/ )  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:15, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
263002 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262999 +++$+++ 263001 +++$+++ 2008-09-09 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.220944320E09 +++$+++ Yes, you've got five days. [[User:Casliber|Casliber]]'s [[User:Casliber\/DYK|mind-blowing efforts]] notwithstanding, there is a shortage of health and science DYKs, so it would be very nice to see this on the Main Page. Just make sure the article is over 1500 characters and the hook under 200 :) You could use something like \"...that several historic figures, from [[Samuel Johnson]] to [[George III of the United Kingdom|George III]], have been '''[[retrospective diagnosis|retrospectively diagnosed]]''' with diseases unknown during their lifetimes?\" :)  +++$+++ :::Yes, you've got five days. [[User:Casliber|Casliber]]'s [[User:Casliber/DYK|mind-blowing efforts]] notwithstanding, there is a shortage of health and science DYKs, so it would be very nice to see this on the Main Page. Just make sure the article is over 1500 characters and the hook under 200 :) You could use something like "...that several historic figures, from [[Samuel Johnson]] to [[George III of the United Kingdom|George III]], have been '''[[retrospective diagnosis|retrospectively diagnosed]]''' with diseases unknown during their lifetimes?" :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 00:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
263003 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262999 +++$+++ 263002 +++$+++ 2008-09-09 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.220944500E09 +++$+++ Fv, where have you been all my life ?  I never see you any more <pout>.   +++$+++ :::: Fv, where have you been all my life ?  I never see you any more <pout>.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
263004 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262999 +++$+++ 263002 +++$+++ 2008-09-09 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.220965980E09 +++$+++ I have already nominated this for DYK.  +++$+++ ::::I have already nominated this for DYK. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 06:13, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

858 +++$+++ Panthdaman +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 858 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-20 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.174415700E09 +++$+++ Thats good to hear ;) Maybe you could do me a favor now. I found a mistake on [[Fu%C3%9Fball-Bundesliga|Bundesliga]]. Theres this this template on the Bundesliga champions on the right side where they are all listed. Instead of 1998\/1999 Bayern M\xfcnchen it states 1988\/1989. Just a minor edit but i couldnt find out where the source code of the box is located.-- +++$+++ Thats good to hear ;) Maybe you could do me a favor now. I found a mistake on [[Fu%C3%9Fball-Bundesliga|Bundesliga]]. Theres this this template on the Bundesliga champions on the right side where they are all listed. Instead of 1998/1999 Bayern München it states 1988/1989. Just a minor edit but i couldnt find out where the source code of the box is located.--[[User:Panthdaman|Panth]] 11:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
859 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 858 +++$+++ 858 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.174417980E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that club page had a pretty detailed history section that also included a number of tidbits that I'll be able to use in the articles for other clubs. I've made the fix of the error you pointed out on the [[Fu%C3%9Fball-Bundesliga|Bundesliga]] page. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Yeah, that club page had a pretty detailed history section that also included a number of tidbits that I'll be able to use in the articles for other clubs. I've made the fix of the error you pointed out on the [[Fu%C3%9Fball-Bundesliga|Bundesliga]] page. Thanks again. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 12:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

263005 +++$+++ Una Smith +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-10 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.221109260E09 +++$+++ Did you mean to delete the Charles Darwin item? -- +++$+++ Did you mean to delete the Charles Darwin item? --[[User:Una Smith|Una Smith]] ([[User talk:Una Smith|talk]]) 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
263006 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263005 +++$+++ 263005 +++$+++ 2008-09-10 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.221109800E09 +++$+++ I replaced it with FDR, who I've submitted as an alternative hook on the DKY nomination. I ''really'' don't want the article to become a list of retrospective diagnoses, as it would be hundreds of entries long. I'd prefer to replace the examples list with prose and give some more general comment on some of the better RDs -- as currently the article is a bit unbalanced.  +++$+++ :I replaced it with FDR, who I've submitted as an alternative hook on the DKY nomination. I ''really'' don't want the article to become a list of retrospective diagnoses, as it would be hundreds of entries long. I'd prefer to replace the examples list with prose and give some more general comment on some of the better RDs -- as currently the article is a bit unbalanced. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
263007 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263005 +++$+++ 263006 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.221209460E09 +++$+++ I saw some interesting digs on the DYK page; are there seriously still people who don't accept Johnson's diagnosis?   +++$+++ :: I saw some interesting digs on the DYK page; are there seriously still people who don't accept Johnson's diagnosis?  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
263008 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263005 +++$+++ 263007 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.221230820E09 +++$+++ Sorry, you've lost me there. Where are the \"digs\"? I must admit I'm finding the DYK a bit confusing. Three comments by three editors and no follow-up. I suppose it is a \"lite\" process rather than a discussion.  Perhaps it isn't fascinating enough? I remember finding that FDR article and reading the paper and thinking it was a great story.  +++$+++ :::Sorry, you've lost me there. Where are the "digs"? I must admit I'm finding the DYK a bit confusing. Three comments by three editors and no follow-up. I suppose it is a "lite" process rather than a discussion.  Perhaps it isn't fascinating enough? I remember finding that FDR article and reading the paper and thinking it was a great story. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 07:47, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
263009 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263005 +++$+++ 263008 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.221268620E09 +++$+++ I agree, the page is a mess; no wonder I've never participated :-)  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=237485279&oldid=237483085 This] looked like a dig at all the recent Johnson DYKs, but it could be that I'm still just surprised at the questions that come up on the FAC, since the diagnosis is so solidly supported.   +++$+++ :::: I agree, the page is a mess; no wonder I've never participated :-)  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=237485279&oldid=237483085 This] looked like a dig at all the recent Johnson DYKs, but it could be that I'm still just surprised at the questions that come up on the FAC, since the diagnosis is so solidly supported.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:17, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

862 +++$+++ J2w +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 862 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-26 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.174946940E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:J2w|J2w]] 15:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
863 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 862 +++$+++ 862 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.174980360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the info. Nice find! Where did you come across those old logos? I'll put together an updated historical logo image in the next day or two.   +++$+++ : Thanks for the info. Nice find! Where did you come across those old logos? I'll put together an updated historical logo image in the next day or two.  [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 00:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
864 +++$+++ J2w +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 862 +++$+++ 863 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.175050860E09 +++$+++ I have created this logos for the internet from paper versions from the club archive. The \"green\" logo on your pic is an older logo from another club in Jena (SV Jenapharm Jena, former: BSG Jenapharm Jena (1982-1989), BSG Chemie Jena (1951-1982)). -- +++$+++ :: I have created this logos for the internet from paper versions from the club archive. The "green" logo on your pic is an older logo from another club in Jena (SV Jenapharm Jena, former: BSG Jenapharm Jena (1982-1989), BSG Chemie Jena (1951-1982)). --[[User:J2w|J2w]] 20:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

480741 +++$+++ Tangotango +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-28 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.143577200E09 +++$+++ Fetofs, thank you for welcoming me to Esperanza. I feel so excited to be joining the club :) -  +++$+++ Fetofs, thank you for welcoming me to Esperanza. I feel so excited to be joining the club :) - [[User:Tangotango|Tangotango]] 12:20, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
480742 +++$+++ Tangotango +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480741 +++$+++ 480741 +++$+++ 2006-03-28 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.143579420E09 +++$+++ Per your suggestion, I've added the userbox to my user page, and the signature too. - [[User:Tangotango|Tangot]] +++$+++ :Per your suggestion, I've added the userbox to my user page, and the signature too. - [[User:Tangotango|Tangot]][[User:Tangotango/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User Talk:Tangotango|ngo]] 12:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

528982 +++$+++ Woody +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-05 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.196895840E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Chemical surface diffusion slow.gif|Great minds think alike!!]] By the way, you don't have to protect the image once you have uploaded it. The cascading protection of the main page does that for you! Regards.  +++$+++ [[:Image:Chemical surface diffusion slow.gif|Great minds think alike!!]] By the way, you don't have to protect the image once you have uploaded it. The cascading protection of the main page does that for you! Regards. [[User:Woody|Woody]] ([[User talk:Woody|talk]]) 15:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
528983 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528982 +++$+++ 528982 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.196898120E09 +++$+++ I wasn't positive, so I protected it just in case. I've been watching: some admins protect it and others don't. About the upload: your upload wasn't started when I started uploading it. When I saw you had uploaded the image, I paused to see if you were promoting the next group. After you did, I left the rest for you. Thanks for jumping in and promoting the group!  +++$+++ :I wasn't positive, so I protected it just in case. I've been watching: some admins protect it and others don't. About the upload: your upload wasn't started when I started uploading it. When I saw you had uploaded the image, I paused to see if you were promoting the next group. After you did, I left the rest for you. Thanks for jumping in and promoting the group! [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 15:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
528984 +++$+++ Woody +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528982 +++$+++ 528983 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.196900880E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, that red banner had been annoying me, so I did it for the first time!  +++$+++ ::Fair enough, that red banner had been annoying me, so I did it for the first time! [[User:Woody|Woody]] ([[User talk:Woody|talk]]) 16:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

866 +++$+++ Batiberlin +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-03 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.175591460E09 +++$+++ have a nice day-- +++$+++ have a nice day--[[User:Batiberlin|Batiberlin]] 02:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
867 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 866 +++$+++ 866 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.175927880E09 +++$+++ I don't know if you have seen it or not, but I left an email address you can use at your talk page. I'll repost it here - wikiwiggy@gmail.com  +++$+++ :I don't know if you have seen it or not, but I left an email address you can use at your talk page. I'll repost it here - wikiwiggy@gmail.com [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 23:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

868 +++$+++ -Lemmy- +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 868 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-13 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.176486300E09 +++$+++ Hi,Wiggy! I noticed your great work on German football and especially the logo section. I wondered if you could upload the old logos for [[Eintracht Frankfurt]] for they are missing and I'm not in the picture right stuff. That would be very appreciated by me as I'm keeping the Eintracht page up to date. I'm not sure if you are familiar with German but anyway: Sch\xf6nen Gru\xdf nach Kanada! ;-)  +++$+++ Hi,Wiggy! I noticed your great work on German football and especially the logo section. I wondered if you could upload the old logos for [[Eintracht Frankfurt]] for they are missing and I'm not in the picture right stuff. That would be very appreciated by me as I'm keeping the Eintracht page up to date. I'm not sure if you are familiar with German but anyway: Schönen Gruß nach Kanada! ;-) [[User:-Lemmy-|-Lemmy-]] 10:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
869 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 868 +++$+++ 868 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.176487680E09 +++$+++ Sure, I will look around and see what I can find. My German is not very good, but I am getting by with the Google-machine. F\xfcr deine guten W\xfcnsche danke. Good work on the Eintracht page.  +++$+++ :Sure, I will look around and see what I can find. My German is not very good, but I am getting by with the Google-machine. Für deine guten Wünsche danke. Good work on the Eintracht page. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 11:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

263013 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-14 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.221436860E09 +++$+++ The nom had been struck through as well ... I presumed then that this reflected some consensus. Nevertheless, if an article is subject to this much drama and controversy at that point we usually don't put it on the Main Page.  +++$+++ The nom had been struck through as well ... I presumed then that this reflected some consensus. Nevertheless, if an article is subject to this much drama and controversy at that point we usually don't put it on the Main Page. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 17:01, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
263014 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.221437520E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&oldid=238367631 Again?] Something needs to be done when one editor's OR becomes \"this much drama and controversy\".  +++$+++ : [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&oldid=238367631 Again?] Something needs to be done when one editor's OR becomes "this much drama and controversy". [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:12, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
263015 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 263014 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.221438120E09 +++$+++ I give up, the page is a navigational nightmare, most participants there don't use edit summaries, and I'm unable to determine who struck the hooks.  What I can determine is that Una Smith's OR derailed a perfectly legit DYK (saw similar on at least one FAC), which confirms my suspicions about the value of investing time in that page.  Why was one editor's OR allowed to create the impression of \"this much drama and controversy\", and where were the other medical editors?  Well, since the page is so hard to negotiate ...   +++$+++ :: I give up, the page is a navigational nightmare, most participants there don't use edit summaries, and I'm unable to determine who struck the hooks.  What I can determine is that Una Smith's OR derailed a perfectly legit DYK (saw similar on at least one FAC), which confirms my suspicions about the value of investing time in that page.  Why was one editor's OR allowed to create the impression of "this much drama and controversy", and where were the other medical editors?  Well, since the page is so hard to negotiate ...  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:22, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
263016 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 263015 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.221439440E09 +++$+++ I struck through the original nom when I offered an alternative as reviewers will still looking just at the original. The original was deemed too long and (I think) a reviewer had an issue with us saying \"is regarded by some medical historians\" but only citing one. I couldn't figure out how to use the quote in a short DKY and remain accurate. I thought my alternative was interesting and 100% sourced but Una has some problems with it that I just can't understand. Certainly the lack of any interaction with reviewers at DKY makes it hard to respond and ask questions.  +++$+++ :::I struck through the original nom when I offered an alternative as reviewers will still looking just at the original. The original was deemed too long and (I think) a reviewer had an issue with us saying "is regarded by some medical historians" but only citing one. I couldn't figure out how to use the quote in a short DKY and remain accurate. I thought my alternative was interesting and 100% sourced but Una has some problems with it that I just can't understand. Certainly the lack of any interaction with reviewers at DKY makes it hard to respond and ask questions. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 17:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
263017 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 263016 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.221439740E09 +++$+++ Well, it's a concern that one person's OR can create the impression of drama and controversy, but also of concern is how difficult it is to negotiate that page.  Most editors don't use edit summaries, it's hard to follow, and it seems like a free-for-all, ripe for a situation where one editor's OR can derail a nom.  I regret recommending that you go there, as the page appears to be somewhat of a timesink.  Of course, I'm obliged to divulge that FAC isn't entirely immune either, considering Una Smith did similar on a FAC, but at least in that case there were many editors involved so it wasn't one person derailing the FAC.   +++$+++ :::: Well, it's a concern that one person's OR can create the impression of drama and controversy, but also of concern is how difficult it is to negotiate that page.  Most editors don't use edit summaries, it's hard to follow, and it seems like a free-for-all, ripe for a situation where one editor's OR can derail a nom.  I regret recommending that you go there, as the page appears to be somewhat of a timesink.  Of course, I'm obliged to divulge that FAC isn't entirely immune either, considering Una Smith did similar on a FAC, but at least in that case there were many editors involved so it wasn't one person derailing the FAC.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:49, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
263018 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 263016 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.221440700E09 +++$+++ Our general convention is that a strikethrough of the original hook means the entire nomination is withdrawn. I agree it's a navigational nightmare for newcomers; I have had some ideas about at least making the individual date pages transcludable onto the main T:TDYK page ''a la'' the various deletion pages, but not the time to suggest it because we're all so busy 1) reviewing hooks, 2) waiting for people to respond to concerns, 3) putting good hooks into the next update and 4) updating the template every six hours or so, reuploading the new image from Commons (which we usually have to do) and protecting it spamming the article talk pages, notifying everyone who deserves credit for creating the article and\/or nominating it, clearing the next update page, archiving the old hooks, and finally deleting the old image if its been uploaded from Commons. Yes, in other words, we're overworked and understaffed (That last series of tasks can take me about 20 minutes; it used to take a half hour). The current system is probably a holdover from the days when hook nominations were less frequent, usually approved and posted as a matter of course with or without sourcing and the template was only updated once a day.<p>As the DYK policies say at the top of the page, we reviewers reserve the right to reject a hook if there are serious problems with an article that would make it reflect poorly on Wikipedia were it linked from the Main Page. I felt that this much discussion about OR probably reflected the aforesaid issues, and those might even be heightened if it appeared on the Main Page (We have seen people use that opportunity to spitefully nominate articles for deletion, forcing them off the Main Page. At least I have. And I wouldn't have been surprised if that had happened here). Yes, these concerns were raised by one editor, but the response and counterresponse cycle didn't help. My suggestion is that if this happens again, move the discussion to the talk page sooner rather than later and resolve them there while you put the nom on hold (I'd be willing to extend the deadline for it a few days and I think other DYK reviewers might as well).  +++$+++ ::::Our general convention is that a strikethrough of the original hook means the entire nomination is withdrawn. I agree it's a navigational nightmare for newcomers; I have had some ideas about at least making the individual date pages transcludable onto the main T:TDYK page ''a la'' the various deletion pages, but not the time to suggest it because we're all so busy 1) reviewing hooks, 2) waiting for people to respond to concerns, 3) putting good hooks into the next update and 4) updating the template every six hours or so, reuploading the new image from Commons (which we usually have to do) and protecting it spamming the article talk pages, notifying everyone who deserves credit for creating the article and/or nominating it, clearing the next update page, archiving the old hooks, and finally deleting the old image if its been uploaded from Commons. Yes, in other words, we're overworked and understaffed (That last series of tasks can take me about 20 minutes; it used to take a half hour). The current system is probably a holdover from the days when hook nominations were less frequent, usually approved and posted as a matter of course with or without sourcing and the template was only updated once a day.<p>As the DYK policies say at the top of the page, we reviewers reserve the right to reject a hook if there are serious problems with an article that would make it reflect poorly on Wikipedia were it linked from the Main Page. I felt that this much discussion about OR probably reflected the aforesaid issues, and those might even be heightened if it appeared on the Main Page (We have seen people use that opportunity to spitefully nominate articles for deletion, forcing them off the Main Page. At least I have. And I wouldn't have been surprised if that had happened here). Yes, these concerns were raised by one editor, but the response and counterresponse cycle didn't help. My suggestion is that if this happens again, move the discussion to the talk page sooner rather than later and resolve them there while you put the nom on hold (I'd be willing to extend the deadline for it a few days and I think other DYK reviewers might as well). [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 18:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
263019 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 263018 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.221441180E09 +++$+++ I understand, Daniel Case, and there are never enough people in any of the content review areas.  It was an unfortunate case, and if any of us had more experience in DYK, it might have been approached differently.  Although it is unfortunate that one person created the faulty impression, I guess that's really not DYK's problem.  Transcluded pages may help, but who has time to set them up.  If anyone is eventually interested in trying that, you could check with Ruhrfisch, Geometry guy, and Happymelon for people who have some experience in that realm.  By the way, we're running out of topics for [[WP:FCDW]], so if putting together a Dispatch will help resolve any of the short-staffing, please weigh in there with a proposed topic and we'll find a slot for you; the last DYK Dispatch was [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost\/2008-05-02\/Dispatches]].  (How's that for taking over Colin's talk page?)  +++$+++ ::::: I understand, Daniel Case, and there are never enough people in any of the content review areas.  It was an unfortunate case, and if any of us had more experience in DYK, it might have been approached differently.  Although it is unfortunate that one person created the faulty impression, I guess that's really not DYK's problem.  Transcluded pages may help, but who has time to set them up.  If anyone is eventually interested in trying that, you could check with Ruhrfisch, Geometry guy, and Happymelon for people who have some experience in that realm.  By the way, we're running out of topics for [[WP:FCDW]], so if putting together a Dispatch will help resolve any of the short-staffing, please weigh in there with a proposed topic and we'll find a slot for you; the last DYK Dispatch was [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-05-02/Dispatches]].  (How's that for taking over Colin's talk page?) [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
263020 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 263019 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.221444900E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your kind and civil response. This does happen occasionally when people who don't have as much experience submitting submit and run afoul of DYK procedures, but I'm confident you've learned from the experience (I've been on the other side of it at FARC, actually). I'll see what I can do about putting together a dispatch ... if this aspect of the discussion needs to be continued, we can do so at my talk page.  +++$+++ ::::::Thank you for your kind and civil response. This does happen occasionally when people who don't have as much experience submitting submit and run afoul of DYK procedures, but I'm confident you've learned from the experience (I've been on the other side of it at FARC, actually). I'll see what I can do about putting together a dispatch ... if this aspect of the discussion needs to be continued, we can do so at my talk page. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 19:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
263021 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.221441840E09 +++$+++ I wish you would have contacted me. I had an idea for a good alternate that was short, too the point, and without any problems, but I guess its too late now?  +++$+++ :I wish you would have contacted me. I had an idea for a good alternate that was short, too the point, and without any problems, but I guess its too late now? [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 18:24, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
263022 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 263021 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.221445380E09 +++$+++ Colin didn't submit the DYK; part of the issue may have been that JFW somewhat jumped the gun when he submitted.   +++$+++ :: Colin didn't submit the DYK; part of the issue may have been that JFW somewhat jumped the gun when he submitted.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:23, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
263023 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 263022 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.221447600E09 +++$+++ You know, a DYK is < 200 characters and generated ''this'' much response. I wonder if that text:discussion ratio beats Ottava's FAC? :-)  +++$+++ :::You know, a DYK is < 200 characters and generated ''this'' much response. I wonder if that text:discussion ratio beats Ottava's FAC? :-) [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:00, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
263024 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263013 +++$+++ 263023 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.221449280E09 +++$+++ Colin, I watched all this from the sidelines; I don't know anything about the DYK process. It all got rather silly. Sorry I could not help. Graham.  +++$+++ ::::Colin, I watched all this from the sidelines; I don't know anything about the DYK process. It all got rather silly. Sorry I could not help. Graham. [[User:GrahamColm|Graham <font color="blue">Colm</font>]] [[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:28, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

870 +++$+++ -Lemmy- +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 870 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-12 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.202865900E09 +++$+++ Oi,Wiggy. I created a [[Eintracht_Frankfurt#Colours.2C_crest_and_nicknames|new section]] in my favourite article. May I \"misuse\" you to have a swift cross-read? All the best  +++$+++ Oi,Wiggy. I created a [[Eintracht_Frankfurt#Colours.2C_crest_and_nicknames|new section]] in my favourite article. May I "misuse" you to have a swift cross-read? All the best [[User:-Lemmy-|-Lemmy-]] ([[User talk:-Lemmy-|talk]]) 17:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
871 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 870 +++$+++ 870 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.202869740E09 +++$+++ I've copy edited your material if you want to have a look. Nice addition to the page, Lemmy!  +++$+++ :I've copy edited your material if you want to have a look. Nice addition to the page, Lemmy! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 18:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
872 +++$+++ -Lemmy- +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 870 +++$+++ 871 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.202873340E09 +++$+++ Fantastic as always!:-) Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Fantastic as always!:-) Thanks! [[User:-Lemmy-|-Lemmy-]] ([[User talk:-Lemmy-|talk]]) 19:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

525159 +++$+++ Serephine +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.163842680E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, reckon the squamous cell article is superfluous? They exist only in [[squamous epithelia]] and this article covers all there is to know about them. Both are stubs so why not combine them? I'll get onto it with your suggestion. -- ''''' +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, reckon the squamous cell article is superfluous? They exist only in [[squamous epithelia]] and this article covers all there is to know about them. Both are stubs so why not combine them? I'll get onto it with your suggestion. -- '''''[[User:Serephine|<font color="#3D8B37">Serephine</font>]]''''' <b><font style="color:#FF5333;">♠</font></b> '''''<small>[[User talk:Serephine|<span style="color:#009900;">talk</span>]]</small>''''' - 01:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
525160 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525159 +++$+++ 525159 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.164107220E09 +++$+++ I would not object to a merge. -- +++$+++ :I would not object to a merge. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 03:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

525161 +++$+++ Loganberry +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-21 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.164106980E09 +++$+++ Is the different spelling of \"vesicle\" in the title and \"vesical\" in the actual dab entries correct? I have no idea, as I'm not a specialist, but if so, it seems odd that there's no entry at [[vesical arteries]].  +++$+++ Is the different spelling of "vesicle" in the title and "vesical" in the actual dab entries correct? I have no idea, as I'm not a specialist, but if so, it seems odd that there's no entry at [[vesical arteries]]. [[User:Loganberry|Loganberry]] ([[User talk:Loganberry|Talk]]) 03:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
525162 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525161 +++$+++ 525161 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.164107220E09 +++$+++ Fixed. -- +++$+++ :Fixed. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 03:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

875 +++$+++ Eastmain +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-25 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.180078440E09 +++$+++ You might want to add the fair use rationale that I added at [[:Image:SpVggUnterhaching.png]] to *all* the football (soccer) logos which you have uploaded. I realize that doing so will be a lot of work, but it might be good insurance against having the logos tagged for deletion by another editor or a bot. -- +++$+++ You might want to add the fair use rationale that I added at [[:Image:SpVggUnterhaching.png]] to *all* the football (soccer) logos which you have uploaded. I realize that doing so will be a lot of work, but it might be good insurance against having the logos tagged for deletion by another editor or a bot. --[[User:Eastmain|Eastmain]] 00:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
876 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 875 +++$+++ 875 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.180082460E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I was figuring on something like that. There's close to 300 images, though, so it's not going to happen within three days or one week or whatever asinine target the BCbot has in mind. I don't have a bot and I do have a life. While I can appreciate the need for images being properly tagged, the approach is heavy handed. Assembling a group of editors to facilitate a transition alongside the bot's work would have been a friendlier way of meeting the objective. The arguments over what constitutes a proper fair use rationale that then follow the bot around are just adding insult to injury. It has me hoping that BC loses his wallet and gets caught in the bureaucratic circles of hell. He should be able to appreciate the irony of it all on some level given that there will be lots of mindless nobs around who will insist only on doing things ''right'' and filling out the necessary forms just so - even if they're out of date, or change every other day.  +++$+++ :Yeah, I was figuring on something like that. There's close to 300 images, though, so it's not going to happen within three days or one week or whatever asinine target the BCbot has in mind. I don't have a bot and I do have a life. While I can appreciate the need for images being properly tagged, the approach is heavy handed. Assembling a group of editors to facilitate a transition alongside the bot's work would have been a friendlier way of meeting the objective. The arguments over what constitutes a proper fair use rationale that then follow the bot around are just adding insult to injury. It has me hoping that BC loses his wallet and gets caught in the bureaucratic circles of hell. He should be able to appreciate the irony of it all on some level given that there will be lots of mindless nobs around who will insist only on doing things ''right'' and filling out the necessary forms just so - even if they're out of date, or change every other day. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 01:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

525165 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525165 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-26 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.164530760E09 +++$+++ I've have [[Template_talk:Infobox_Hospital#Merge_proposal_Template:Infobox_NHS_hospital|some proposals to upgrade]] functionality and wider (less US-centric) scope of the [[Template:Infobox Hospital]] (with then a merge in of the UK-centric [[Template:Infobox NHS hospital]]). I think the additional optional parameter names are as generic and succint as I am likely to get - but I would be grateful if you could have a quick glance at the [[Template_talk:Infobox_Hospital#Funding|list of parameters]] and let me know if there are any obvious problems in the proposal. Thanks, yours  +++$+++ I've have [[Template_talk:Infobox_Hospital#Merge_proposal_Template:Infobox_NHS_hospital|some proposals to upgrade]] functionality and wider (less US-centric) scope of the [[Template:Infobox Hospital]] (with then a merge in of the UK-centric [[Template:Infobox NHS hospital]]). I think the additional optional parameter names are as generic and succint as I am likely to get - but I would be grateful if you could have a quick glance at the [[Template_talk:Infobox_Hospital#Funding|list of parameters]] and let me know if there are any obvious problems in the proposal. Thanks, yours [[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 00:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
525166 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525165 +++$+++ 525165 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.164533100E09 +++$+++ Looks good. My only question is -- with all the additional fields, is \"Location\" supposed to refer to a street address? If so (or even if not), it might make sense to use a field name that was more self-documenting. But you've done a great job with the template, and I appreciate your diligence and precision. -- +++$+++ :Looks good. My only question is -- with all the additional fields, is "Location" supposed to refer to a street address? If so (or even if not), it might make sense to use a field name that was more self-documenting. But you've done a great job with the template, and I appreciate your diligence and precision. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
525167 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525165 +++$+++ 525166 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.164787740E09 +++$+++ So the Location information may be used for street and in addition region (city) information as it is freetext that can be manually wikilinked. +++$+++ ::So the Location information may be used for street and in addition region (city) information as it is freetext that can be manually wikilinked.[[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 00:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

878 +++$+++ Lectonar +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-23 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.182655140E09 +++$+++ Sorry to bother you; I've been following your exchanges with the user above, and I cannot fail to notice his, let's say obvious bias, concerning GDR football and the GDR herself. I've left him messages in German, as his English is probably not good enough to understand what we want of him. If you encounter real problems, just let me know.  +++$+++ Sorry to bother you; I've been following your exchanges with the user above, and I cannot fail to notice his, let's say obvious bias, concerning GDR football and the GDR herself. I've left him messages in German, as his English is probably not good enough to understand what we want of him. If you encounter real problems, just let me know. [[User:Lectonar|Lectonar]] 20:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
879 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 878 +++$+++ 878 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.182663660E09 +++$+++ It is no bother. Thanks for the notice and your consideration. I don't know how long you have been following, but it is a stupid, petty little drama that's been going on for months now and this is pretty much as quiet as it has been. Kay's English is clearly not that good, and he's got a clear POV. He has been approached in German before, but to no real effect. Nonetheless, no harm in trying. You may have the magic touch. Thank you for your offer and I'll give you a shout if it ever escalates again.  +++$+++ :It is no bother. Thanks for the notice and your consideration. I don't know how long you have been following, but it is a stupid, petty little drama that's been going on for months now and this is pretty much as quiet as it has been. Kay's English is clearly not that good, and he's got a clear POV. He has been approached in German before, but to no real effect. Nonetheless, no harm in trying. You may have the magic touch. Thank you for your offer and I'll give you a shout if it ever escalates again. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 22:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

525168 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-28 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.164786780E09 +++$+++ On a separate issue, can you advise me on how US hospitals are classified in terms of [[health care system]] provision. Have a look at [[Massachusetts General Hospital]]. I've set the HealthCare parameter to \"Medicare\" in as much as it takes Medicare patients. I suspect though that this shows my lack of understanding. For Canadian hospitals they are either Private or part of the \"Public [[Medicare (Canada)]]\" system. Likewise hospitals are (or at least until the Labour giovernment started its love-affair with private hospitals) either purely Private or Public [[National Health Service|NHS]] (which may have a few private beds to help support the hospital). However for US I suspect that most hospitals would be considered Private with it then up to the individual patient to arrange to pay themselves, claim on their health insurance policy, or be eligible under [[Medicare (United States)]] -  or are there quite distinct hospitals which only deal with Medicare cases ? I shall hold off updating further US Hospital articles until I can gain a better understanding of this (e.g. does HealthCare=Medicare need to show up as \"Private, accepts Medicare\")  +++$+++ On a separate issue, can you advise me on how US hospitals are classified in terms of [[health care system]] provision. Have a look at [[Massachusetts General Hospital]]. I've set the HealthCare parameter to "Medicare" in as much as it takes Medicare patients. I suspect though that this shows my lack of understanding. For Canadian hospitals they are either Private or part of the "Public [[Medicare (Canada)]]" system. Likewise hospitals are (or at least until the Labour giovernment started its love-affair with private hospitals) either purely Private or Public [[National Health Service|NHS]] (which may have a few private beds to help support the hospital). However for US I suspect that most hospitals would be considered Private with it then up to the individual patient to arrange to pay themselves, claim on their health insurance policy, or be eligible under [[Medicare (United States)]] -  or are there quite distinct hospitals which only deal with Medicare cases ? I shall hold off updating further US Hospital articles until I can gain a better understanding of this (e.g. does HealthCare=Medicare need to show up as "Private, accepts Medicare") [[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 23:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
525169 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525168 +++$+++ 525168 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.164787740E09 +++$+++ As further example, see [[Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center (Seattle)]] - where [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Children%27s_Hospital_and_Regional_Medical_Center_%28Seattle%29&action=edit the markup] is a little convoluted, yet holding the \"Washington\" detail out of the Location & Region parameters allows it to be used in the State parameter with the desired result that the 'See also' section automatically comes up with the link to [[List of hospitals in Washington]] with the neater displayed-text of \"Hospitals in Washington\". This contrast with say [[St Thomas' Hospital]] where [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=St_Thomas%27_Hospital&action=edit the markup] is much more straight forward.  +++$+++ : As further example, see [[Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center (Seattle)]] - where [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Children%27s_Hospital_and_Regional_Medical_Center_%28Seattle%29&action=edit the markup] is a little convoluted, yet holding the "Washington" detail out of the Location & Region parameters allows it to be used in the State parameter with the desired result that the 'See also' section automatically comes up with the link to [[List of hospitals in Washington]] with the neater displayed-text of "Hospitals in Washington". This contrast with say [[St Thomas' Hospital]] where [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St_Thomas%27_Hospital&action=edit the markup] is much more straight forward. [[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 00:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
525170 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525168 +++$+++ 525169 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.164790740E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but I don't think I'm knowledgeable enough yet about funding to answer your question. -- +++$+++ :: I'm sorry, but I don't think I'm knowledgeable enough yet about funding to answer your question. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 00:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

881 +++$+++ Kingjeff +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-23 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.182662580E09 +++$+++ Would you be interested?  +++$+++ Would you be interested? [[User:Kingjeff|Kingjeff]] 22:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
882 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 881 +++$+++ 881 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.182663300E09 +++$+++ I'll drift over and have a look. I'm giving it some consideration. I didn't enjoy my last turn there because of an overly aggressive, narrow minded editor, but he looks to have pretty much gone away. It's the major German team and deserves a better article. Should be headed to a feature.  +++$+++ :I'll drift over and have a look. I'm giving it some consideration. I didn't enjoy my last turn there because of an overly aggressive, narrow minded editor, but he looks to have pretty much gone away. It's the major German team and deserves a better article. Should be headed to a feature. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 22:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

525171 +++$+++ Dr Aaron +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525171 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-27 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.164625080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dr Aaron|Dr Aaron]] 02:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
525172 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525171 +++$+++ 525171 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.164625380E09 +++$+++ If you'd like to rearrange the pages in that manner, I would have no objection. If you need assistance in doing so, let me know. -- +++$+++ :If you'd like to rearrange the pages in that manner, I would have no objection. If you need assistance in doing so, let me know. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 03:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

885 +++$+++ -Lemmy- +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-23 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.182657660E09 +++$+++ Hi, Wiggy! I have just updated all [[Template:Oberliga_Hessen|Oberliga Hessen]] teams. The promoted sides are missing. Maybe we could add them together. One more note: The current Oberliga team [[FSV Steinbach]] will be renamed [[FSV 1926 Fernwald]] on [[de:FSV_1926_Fernwald|July 1st]]. Could you change the logo? I will switch the whole article on July 1st. Thanks again for your efforts!  +++$+++ Hi, Wiggy! I have just updated all [[Template:Oberliga_Hessen|Oberliga Hessen]] teams. The promoted sides are missing. Maybe we could add them together. One more note: The current Oberliga team [[FSV Steinbach]] will be renamed [[FSV 1926 Fernwald]] on [[de:FSV_1926_Fernwald|July 1st]]. Could you change the logo? I will switch the whole article on July 1st. Thanks again for your efforts! [[User:-Lemmy-|-Lemmy-]] 21:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
886 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 885 +++$+++ 885 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.182661560E09 +++$+++ Great, sounds like a plan. I'll chip away as I have time and add logos where I'm able. Nice to see all the German league stuff coming together. Just about at the 300 team article count which compares favourably to what's available for many other countries. I see your name pop up all the time, so I'm equally appreciative of your work. Thanks and keep well.  +++$+++ :Great, sounds like a plan. I'll chip away as I have time and add logos where I'm able. Nice to see all the German league stuff coming together. Just about at the 300 team article count which compares favourably to what's available for many other countries. I see your name pop up all the time, so I'm equally appreciative of your work. Thanks and keep well. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 22:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

888 +++$+++ Kingjeff +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 888 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-24 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.182681480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up. He doesn't know any english?  +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up. He doesn't know any english? [[User:Kingjeff|Kingjeff]] 03:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
889 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 888 +++$+++ 888 +++$+++ 2007-06-24 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.182681780E09 +++$+++ Only of the most rudimentary sort. Check out some of the articles under his contribs link and you'll clue in in about two seconds. Its just not there.  +++$+++ :Only of the most rudimentary sort. Check out some of the articles under his contribs link and you'll clue in in about two seconds. Its just not there. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 03:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

524436 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-25 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.190768640E09 +++$+++ Please watchlist this article, got a complaint from article subject about real name repeatedly being added (looks like by {{user|Picguy1013}}). When she sent me the message, I didn't realize the name was in a hidden comment on the page. Shortly after I replied to her message, {{user|Darkasia}} removed the name from the page, I'm pretty sure that is her. I also redacted the info from the talk page, including a photobucket link to a high school yearbook scan included as \"proof\".  +++$+++ Please watchlist this article, got a complaint from article subject about real name repeatedly being added (looks like by {{user|Picguy1013}}). When she sent me the message, I didn't realize the name was in a hidden comment on the page. Shortly after I replied to her message, {{user|Darkasia}} removed the name from the page, I'm pretty sure that is her. I also redacted the info from the talk page, including a photobucket link to a high school yearbook scan included as "proof". [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 18:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
524437 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524436 +++$+++ 524436 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.190769720E09 +++$+++ Watchlisted. We also need to watch [[Cooper City High School]]. Fortunately, Picguy10133 hasn't edited that article since June, and anything since August. The article also desperately needs cleanup, we can't list every magazine appearance - however, that wouldn't leave much. Google searching on \"Lilly Ann\" has the obvious problem that it's a fairly common name. -- +++$+++ : Watchlisted. We also need to watch [[Cooper City High School]]. Fortunately, Picguy10133 hasn't edited that article since June, and anything since August. The article also desperately needs cleanup, we can't list every magazine appearance - however, that wouldn't leave much. Google searching on "Lilly Ann" has the obvious problem that it's a fairly common name. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
524438 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524436 +++$+++ 524437 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.190770080E09 +++$+++ I also removed her from [[List of celebrities who have changed their name]], along with another porn star. That list has the potential to be a BLP nightmare, nothing in it is sourced. I almost think it should be deleted.  +++$+++ :: I also removed her from [[List of celebrities who have changed their name]], along with another porn star. That list has the potential to be a BLP nightmare, nothing in it is sourced. I almost think it should be deleted. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 18:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
524439 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524436 +++$+++ 524438 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.190770440E09 +++$+++ And [[List of pseudonyms]], which probably needs a BLP scrub too.  +++$+++ ::: And [[List of pseudonyms]], which probably needs a BLP scrub too. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 18:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

890 +++$+++ Kingjeff +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-24 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.182682080E09 +++$+++ He sounds like an [[Ossi (East Germans)|Ossi]].  +++$+++ He sounds like an [[Ossi (East Germans)|Ossi]]. [[User:Kingjeff|Kingjeff]] 03:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
891 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 890 +++$+++ 890 +++$+++ 2007-06-24 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.182683040E09 +++$+++ Yup. Nothing wrong with that, but no need to be obsessed with it to the point that you can't contribute.  +++$+++ :Yup. Nothing wrong with that, but no need to be obsessed with it to the point that you can't contribute. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 04:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

525180 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-25 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.167093360E09 +++$+++ | [[Image:Adventsljusstake med tre brinnande ljus.JPG|150px|left]] <big>'''W'''<\/big>herever you are, and whether you're celebrating something or not, there is always a reason to spread the holiday spirit! So, may you have a great day, and may your wishes be fulfilled in 2007!  +++$+++ | [[Image:Adventsljusstake med tre brinnande ljus.JPG|150px|left]] <big>'''W'''</big>herever you are, and whether you're celebrating something or not, there is always a reason to spread the holiday spirit! So, may you have a great day, and may your wishes be fulfilled in 2007! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 16:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
525181 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525180 +++$+++ 525180 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.167258000E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Thank you for having a look at [[PAC-1]] as well. The true collaborative nature of WP always puts a smile on my face...  +++$+++ :Thanks. Thank you for having a look at [[PAC-1]] as well. The true collaborative nature of WP always puts a smile on my face... [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 14:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
525182 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525180 +++$+++ 525180 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.167795840E09 +++$+++ Thank you! -- +++$+++ :Thank you! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 19:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

893 +++$+++ Kingjeff +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-26 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.182901320E09 +++$+++ This is a redirect. I've never heard of this name for 1860 Munich.  +++$+++ This is a redirect. I've never heard of this name for 1860 Munich. [[User:Kingjeff|Kingjeff]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
894 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 893 +++$+++ 893 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.182904500E09 +++$+++ Somebody set up a spoof page (based on the original) which I blanked. A bot came along and reverted that thinking it was vandalism. I blanked it again but added a speedy delete tag, then someone else came along and attached a redirect which isn't quite right. It just plain needs to be nuked and I'm just not familiar enough with the process and haven't had time to better deal with it yet.  +++$+++ :Somebody set up a spoof page (based on the original) which I blanked. A bot came along and reverted that thinking it was vandalism. I blanked it again but added a speedy delete tag, then someone else came along and attached a redirect which isn't quite right. It just plain needs to be nuked and I'm just not familiar enough with the process and haven't had time to better deal with it yet. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 17:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
895 +++$+++ Kingjeff +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 893 +++$+++ 893 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.182906900E09 +++$+++ Then maybe the speedy deletion tag should be added again.  +++$+++ :Then maybe the speedy deletion tag should be added again. [[User:Kingjeff|Kingjeff]] 18:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

263038 +++$+++ 300wackerdrive +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-27 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.225145880E09 +++$+++ Since you have previously been involved in discussions about the policy [[WP:NOR]], it appears that you have a depth of understanding about this policy. I would appreciate your comments concerning an application of this policy's section [[WP:SYNTH]] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research#A_question_about_WP:SYNTH here]. Thank you.  +++$+++ Since you have previously been involved in discussions about the policy [[WP:NOR]], it appears that you have a depth of understanding about this policy. I would appreciate your comments concerning an application of this policy's section [[WP:SYNTH]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research#A_question_about_WP:SYNTH here]. Thank you. [[User:300wackerdrive|300wackerdrive]] ([[User talk:300wackerdrive|talk]]) 15:18, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
263039 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263038 +++$+++ 263038 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.225252320E09 +++$+++ It isn't my own personal opinion but you are right that the source wasn't sufficient. This was an oversight as there are a few sources in the article that would supply the necessary support. I've updated the article and responded on the talk page.  +++$+++ :It isn't my own personal opinion but you are right that the source wasn't sufficient. This was an oversight as there are a few sources in the article that would supply the necessary support. I've updated the article and responded on the talk page. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:52, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
263040 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263038 +++$+++ 263039 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.225522740E09 +++$+++ I reverted the IP, right now the paragraph is indeed adequately sourced. I will keep the list on my watchlist. To the IP, please discuss changes or problems on [[Talk:List of people with epilepsy]] instead of reverting without comment.  +++$+++ ::I reverted the IP, right now the paragraph is indeed adequately sourced. I will keep the list on my watchlist. To the IP, please discuss changes or problems on [[Talk:List of people with epilepsy]] instead of reverting without comment. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 23:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

525184 +++$+++ Persian Poet Gal +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-03 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.167839400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for catching those embarrassing spelling mistakes.  Spent one two many hours working on that diagram :P...I will upload the corrected version at once. +++$+++ Thanks for catching those embarrassing spelling mistakes.  Spent one two many hours working on that diagram :P...I will upload the corrected version at once.[[User:Persian Poet Gal|<font face="comic sans ms"><font color="purple"><i><b>¤~Persian Poet Gal</b></i></font></font>]] <font color="purple">[[User talk:Persian Poet Gal|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]</font> 07:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
525185 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525184 +++$+++ 525184 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.168554000E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about adding categories -- just keep doing exactly what you've been doing, but uploading the images to commons instead of huwiki. Thanks again! -- +++$+++ :Don't worry about adding categories -- just keep doing exactly what you've been doing, but uploading the images to commons instead of huwiki. Thanks again! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 14:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

263041 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263041 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-29 09:24:00 +++$+++ 1.225297440E09 +++$+++ Hey Colin, I have replied [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_article_candidates%2FMajor_depressive_disorder&diff=248372761&oldid=248371239 here] - I wasn't the one who added this bit, and have now read over it a few times, and am pondering whether it obfuscates more than it adds to the article, what do you reckon? Cheers,  +++$+++ Hey Colin, I have replied [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_article_candidates%2FMajor_depressive_disorder&diff=248372761&oldid=248371239 here] - I wasn't the one who added this bit, and have now read over it a few times, and am pondering whether it obfuscates more than it adds to the article, what do you reckon? Cheers, [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 09:24, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
263042 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263041 +++$+++ 263041 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.225834260E09 +++$+++ Hey Colin, I have been tempted to scrap para one and replace with two sentences thus at [[Talk:Major_depressive_disorder#Laboured_.28.3F.29__section]]. Given the huge breadth of the article. I was pondering moving the section to the [[Treatment of depression]] article and leaving this. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hey Colin, I have been tempted to scrap para one and replace with two sentences thus at [[Talk:Major_depressive_disorder#Laboured_.28.3F.29__section]]. Given the huge breadth of the article. I was pondering moving the section to the [[Treatment of depression]] article and leaving this. Cheers, [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 13:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

898 +++$+++ Berlinschneid +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-27 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.185599400E09 +++$+++ \"* [[DFB-Pokal]]: 87\/88 Quarterfinal (winfall viktory in the second round against former leader of the [[Fu\xdfball-Bundesliga]] [[1.FC K\xf6ln]])\"?    Is there a misetake?  +++$+++ "* [[DFB-Pokal]]: 87/88 Quarterfinal (winfall viktory in the second round against former leader of the [[Fußball-Bundesliga]] [[1.FC Köln]])"?    Is there a misetake? [[User:Berlinschneid|Berlinschneid]] 22:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
899 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 898 +++$+++ 898 +++$+++ 2007-07-28 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.185609060E09 +++$+++ Sorry, no mistake. \"Honours\" generally refer to divisional championships, cup wins, or finals appearances (i.e. vice-champions, cup finalists). The win to advance to the quarter final may have been exciting and significant in the club's history, but was not any form of recognized honour - it was simply an appearance in cup tournament play. The game you reference was actually a second round match. The team went on to defeat Hessen Kassel in the Achtelfinale before going out to Werder in the viertelfinale\/quarterfinal. That's not clear from your entry and the team's cup performance is touched on in the main article. I'll work it into the main article if that will do.  +++$+++ :Sorry, no mistake. "Honours" generally refer to divisional championships, cup wins, or finals appearances (i.e. vice-champions, cup finalists). The win to advance to the quarter final may have been exciting and significant in the club's history, but was not any form of recognized honour - it was simply an appearance in cup tournament play. The game you reference was actually a second round match. The team went on to defeat Hessen Kassel in the Achtelfinale before going out to Werder in the viertelfinale/quarterfinal. That's not clear from your entry and the team's cup performance is touched on in the main article. I'll work it into the main article if that will do. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 00:51, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
900 +++$+++ Berlinschneid +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 898 +++$+++ 899 +++$+++ 2007-07-28 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.185685260E09 +++$+++ O.K. That\u2019s nice. And your are right, the win to advance the quarter final is nothing special. But as a long time supporter of the club, it was a great time. Particularly with regard to the depressing years which followed. I know, feelings should not find the way into a encyclopedia. But I think now it is a good compromise.  ;-)   +++$+++ :: O.K. That’s nice. And your are right, the win to advance the quarter final is nothing special. But as a long time supporter of the club, it was a great time. Particularly with regard to the depressing years which followed. I know, feelings should not find the way into a encyclopedia. But I think now it is a good compromise.  ;-)  [[User:Berlinschneid|Berlinschneid]] 22:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
901 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 898 +++$+++ 900 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.185693600E09 +++$+++ A small detail of English usage for your user page - you want to use 70s (to refer to the decade of the 70s), not 70th (which would be used to refer to a place\/platz - which would be a very bad result). Good luck to your club!  +++$+++ :::A small detail of English usage for your user page - you want to use 70s (to refer to the decade of the 70s), not 70th (which would be used to refer to a place/platz - which would be a very bad result). Good luck to your club! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 00:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

525187 +++$+++ ImmortalGoddezz +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525187 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.168156380E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed that you just added this to the [[Cystic fibrosis]] article, <nowiki>{{Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic pathology}}<\/nowiki>. I just wanted to let you know that the template is redlinked and nothing shows up when you add it. I'm not sure if this is intentional (eg you plan on making it later) or not but I thought I would let you know. -- +++$+++ Hi, I noticed that you just added this to the [[Cystic fibrosis]] article, <nowiki>{{Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic pathology}}</nowiki>. I just wanted to let you know that the template is redlinked and nothing shows up when you add it. I'm not sure if this is intentional (eg you plan on making it later) or not but I thought I would let you know. --[[User:ImmortalGoddezz|ImmortalGoddezz]] 23:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
525188 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525187 +++$+++ 525187 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.168156560E09 +++$+++ It should be okay now. -- +++$+++ :It should be okay now. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
525189 +++$+++ ImmortalGoddezz +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525187 +++$+++ 525188 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.168157520E09 +++$+++ Ok, I see it now, just wanted to make sure that it wasn't mislinked or something such as. Thanks. -- +++$+++ ::Ok, I see it now, just wanted to make sure that it wasn't mislinked or something such as. Thanks. --[[User:ImmortalGoddezz|ImmortalGoddezz]] 00:12, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

263044 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-21 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.227319680E09 +++$+++ I am at a loss why you would take a quotation I made from the last support for [[Major depressive disorder]] personally. I know you have defended \"Cas\", but this seems a little off base. Why don't you do another one of those comparisons on how much the article has changed since its nomination. Me, Snowradio and SandyGeorgia are now the fourth, fifth and sixth highest contributors to the article.[http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&page=Major+depressive+disorder&since=&until=&grouped=on&hideminor=on&order=-edit_count&max=100&order=-edit_count&format=html] Paul Gene, the third highest, has not contributed since the FAC nomination.  &mdash; +++$+++ I am at a loss why you would take a quotation I made from the last support for [[Major depressive disorder]] personally. I know you have defended "Cas", but this seems a little off base. Why don't you do another one of those comparisons on how much the article has changed since its nomination. Me, Snowradio and SandyGeorgia are now the fourth, fifth and sixth highest contributors to the article.[http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&page=Major+depressive+disorder&since=&until=&grouped=on&hideminor=on&order=-edit_count&max=100&order=-edit_count&format=html] Paul Gene, the third highest, has not contributed since the FAC nomination.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
263045 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263044 +++$+++ 263044 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.227320760E09 +++$+++ I'll reply on your talk page, to keep things together.  +++$+++ :I'll reply on your talk page, to keep things together. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

902 +++$+++ Yoda1893 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-02 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.186105920E09 +++$+++ Why did you remove the deletion template. The team plays only in the sixth devision. It would also be deleted in German wikipedia, because it isn't notable. -- +++$+++ Why did you remove the deletion template. The team plays only in the sixth devision. It would also be deleted in German wikipedia, because it isn't notable. --[[User:Yoda1893|Yoda1893]] 18:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
903 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 902 +++$+++ 902 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.186106700E09 +++$+++ The club is undergoing some change and has made some recent progress. The article contains more than a lot of stubs for clubs from other countries. I don't see any harm in letting it be for a while and prefer that to seeing the thing disappear entirely.  +++$+++ :The club is undergoing some change and has made some recent progress. The article contains more than a lot of stubs for clubs from other countries. I don't see any harm in letting it be for a while and prefer that to seeing the thing disappear entirely. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 19:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
904 +++$+++ StefanW-en +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 902 +++$+++ 903 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.187121600E09 +++$+++ Hallo Wiggy! I wrote some information for you about the FSG S\xfcdkreis on my [[User_talk:StefanW-en|talk]]-page.  +++$+++ :: Hallo Wiggy! I wrote some information for you about the FSG Südkreis on my [[User_talk:StefanW-en|talk]]-page. [[User:StefanW-en|StefanW-en]] 13:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

453913 +++$+++ Agent 86 +++$+++ Nihiltres +++$+++ 453913 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-30 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.309462500E09 +++$+++ [[Penelope Trunk]] was deleted by you in 2009 after an expired {{tl|prod}} ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Penelope_Trunk&action=history see here]); however, it was deleted this way despite having survived an [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Penelope Trunk|AfD discussion]] in 2007. If you read that AfD discussion, you'll see that it came after a previous \"prod\" had been disputed. I believe it is contrary to policy for an article to be eligible for [[WP:PROD]] deletion if there had been a previous \"prod\" or previous AfD discussion. Therefore, this article should not have been deleted without a second AfD discussion. It should be noted that most of the negative comments in the 2007 AfD discussion are no longer relevant. There are now lots of verifiable independent third party sources about Penelope Trunk, and she is certainly notable. She's a published author; Forbes named her site one of the top websites for women in 2011[http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/2011\/06\/23\/100-best-web-sites-for-women-blogs-2011.html]; she is cited in and is a contributor to several books[http:\/\/www.google.ca\/search?hl=en&biw=1259&bih=600&q=%22penelope%20trunk%22&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=146860l150532l0l16l16l0l15l0l0l62l62l1l1&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&tab=np]; and has no shortage of Ghits[http:\/\/www.google.ca\/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=1259&bih=600&q=%22penelope+trunk%22&oq=%22penelope+trunk%22&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=undefined&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=1344l1344l0l1l1l0l0l0l0l297l297l2-1l1]. Of the press coverage of her, there were significant pieces about in the ''New York Times''[http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/04\/18\/style\/18divorce.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=penelope+trunk&st=nyt&oref=slogin] and ''The Guardian''[http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/lifeandstyle\/2009\/nov\/06\/penelope-trunk-tweet-miscarriage] (the topic relating to Trunk in the latter article garnered a great deal of press at the time). Therefore, this article should be restored.  +++$+++ [[Penelope Trunk]] was deleted by you in 2009 after an expired {{tl|prod}} ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penelope_Trunk&action=history see here]); however, it was deleted this way despite having survived an [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penelope Trunk|AfD discussion]] in 2007. If you read that AfD discussion, you'll see that it came after a previous "prod" had been disputed. I believe it is contrary to policy for an article to be eligible for [[WP:PROD]] deletion if there had been a previous "prod" or previous AfD discussion. Therefore, this article should not have been deleted without a second AfD discussion. It should be noted that most of the negative comments in the 2007 AfD discussion are no longer relevant. There are now lots of verifiable independent third party sources about Penelope Trunk, and she is certainly notable. She's a published author; Forbes named her site one of the top websites for women in 2011[http://www.forbes.com/2011/06/23/100-best-web-sites-for-women-blogs-2011.html]; she is cited in and is a contributor to several books[http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&biw=1259&bih=600&q=%22penelope%20trunk%22&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=146860l150532l0l16l16l0l15l0l0l62l62l1l1&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&tab=np]; and has no shortage of Ghits[http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=1259&bih=600&q=%22penelope+trunk%22&oq=%22penelope+trunk%22&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=undefined&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=1344l1344l0l1l1l0l0l0l0l297l297l2-1l1]. Of the press coverage of her, there were significant pieces about in the ''New York Times''[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/style/18divorce.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=penelope+trunk&st=nyt&oref=slogin] and ''The Guardian''[http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/nov/06/penelope-trunk-tweet-miscarriage] (the topic relating to Trunk in the latter article garnered a great deal of press at the time). Therefore, this article should be restored. [[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] ([[User talk:Agent 86|talk]]) 12:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
453914 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Nihiltres +++$+++ 453913 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.310622000E09 +++$+++ just a notice that this article  is now being discussed at Deletion Review [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Deletion_review\/Log\/2011_July_13] --you may want to comment.   ''' +++$+++ ::just a notice that this article  is now being discussed at Deletion Review [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_July_13] --you may want to comment.   '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 22:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
453915 +++$+++ Ron Ritzman +++$+++ Nihiltres +++$+++ 453913 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310638800E09 +++$+++ According to his contribs, his last edit was on June 27th. -- +++$+++ :::According to his contribs, his last edit was on June 27th. --[[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 03:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

87532 +++$+++ Literaturegeek  +++$+++ Leevanjackson +++$+++ 87532 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-08 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.276062720E09 +++$+++ To add to what Jfdwolff has already said, I don't think that you have too much to worry about on RfA. Reading over your talk page, and checking your block log, it looks like you have a \"clean bill of health\"; there is not much for the community to say against you. The only difficultish bit for you I think will probably be how you respond to questions posed by the community. There may be a couple of other people running for admin from Wiki Med, so if you are \"on the fence\" as to whether or not you run, you could wait until they have run before deciding if you would like to run.-- +++$+++ To add to what Jfdwolff has already said, I don't think that you have too much to worry about on RfA. Reading over your talk page, and checking your block log, it looks like you have a "clean bill of health"; there is not much for the community to say against you. The only difficultish bit for you I think will probably be how you respond to questions posed by the community. There may be a couple of other people running for admin from Wiki Med, so if you are "on the fence" as to whether or not you run, you could wait until they have run before deciding if you would like to run.--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 22:52, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
87533 +++$+++ leevanjackson +++$+++ Leevanjackson +++$+++ 87532 +++$+++ 87532 +++$+++ 2010-06-09 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.276151460E09 +++$+++ Thanks guys, I'll have to look into it a bit more methinks after I've caught up with current todos - whilst keeping an eye out for situations that admin tools would be useful...  +++$+++ :Thanks guys, I'll have to look into it a bit more methinks after I've caught up with current todos - whilst keeping an eye out for situations that admin tools would be useful... [[user:leevanjackson|Lee&there4;V]] [[User talk:leevanjackson|<font color="#a3bfb1">(talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/leevanjackson|<font color="#a3bfb1">contribs)]]</font> 23:31, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

907 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 907 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-07 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.189199220E09 +++$+++ Viel Spa\xdf und Erfolg mit (D\/d)einem Studium! +++$+++ Viel Spaß und Erfolg mit (D/d)einem Studium![[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 14:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
908 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 907 +++$+++ 907 +++$+++ 2007-09-08 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.189313340E09 +++$+++ Cool. Thank you.  +++$+++ :Cool. Thank you. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 21:49, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

525198 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.168841700E09 +++$+++ Hi there Arcadian. Would it be possible for an extra field to be added to {{tl|Protein}} that would account for more than one [[Protein Data Bank|PDB]] link, like the <code>CAS_supplemental<\/code> field in {{tl|Drugbox}}? [[Clostridium perfringens alpha toxin|''Clostridium perfringens'' alpha toxin]] has several PDB links, and they're presently messing up the syntax. Thanks again,  +++$+++ Hi there Arcadian. Would it be possible for an extra field to be added to {{tl|Protein}} that would account for more than one [[Protein Data Bank|PDB]] link, like the <code>CAS_supplemental</code> field in {{tl|Drugbox}}? [[Clostridium perfringens alpha toxin|''Clostridium perfringens'' alpha toxin]] has several PDB links, and they're presently messing up the syntax. Thanks again, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 22:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
525199 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525198 +++$+++ 525198 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.168854060E09 +++$+++ Done. -- +++$+++ :Done. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
525200 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525198 +++$+++ 525199 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.168854240E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Thanks! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 01:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

263055 +++$+++ 70.225.80.236 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263055 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-19 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.232436480E09 +++$+++ Can you please tell me if there was a Versed antagonist that was removed from FDA approval prior to the use of Flumazenil? Thank you! William [[Special:Contributions\/70.225.80.236|70.225.80.236]] ( +++$+++ Can you please tell me if there was a Versed antagonist that was removed from FDA approval prior to the use of Flumazenil? Thank you! William [[Special:Contributions/70.225.80.236|70.225.80.236]] ([[User talk:70.225.80.236|talk]]) 23:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
263056 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263055 +++$+++ 263055 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.232657340E09 +++$+++ I have no idea, and no idea why you are asking me.  +++$+++ :I have no idea, and no idea why you are asking me. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

524440 +++$+++ Xaosflux +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524440 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-26 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.190833440E09 +++$+++ On this page, I was doing a cleanup of indef-protect pages, but otherwise am not very familiar with that page's history.  If you don't hear back from Slim, and want to unprotect it that sounds ok to me, you might want to watchlist it though as SV's protection comment references [[WP:BLP]].  Thanks, \u2014  +++$+++ On this page, I was doing a cleanup of indef-protect pages, but otherwise am not very familiar with that page's history.  If you don't hear back from Slim, and want to unprotect it that sounds ok to me, you might want to watchlist it though as SV's protection comment references [[WP:BLP]].  Thanks, — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype">xaosflux</font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 12:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
524441 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524440 +++$+++ 524440 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.190840520E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Watchlisted. -- +++$+++ : Thank you. Watchlisted. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

914 +++$+++ CheNuevara +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-06 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.191717900E09 +++$+++ I responded to your comments to Kay here. -  +++$+++ I responded to your comments to Kay here. - [[User:CheNuevara|Che Nuevara]] 17:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
915 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 914 +++$+++ 914 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.191718920E09 +++$+++ To which I further responded. Thanks and all, but be wary of this fellow and his conduct. You might want to look at [[User:Fox53]] and follow the concentric circles from there.  +++$+++ :To which I further responded. Thanks and all, but be wary of this fellow and his conduct. You might want to look at [[User:Fox53]] and follow the concentric circles from there. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 18:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
916 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 914 +++$+++ 915 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.191924480E09 +++$+++ I added yet another comment to this discussion, because a) his edits do not make sense to me, and b) I wished to point out the pointlessness of using German on the English-language wikipedia. Have my doubts as to the helpfulness of the efforts, but someone's gotta try, no?  +++$+++ ::I added yet another comment to this discussion, because a) his edits do not make sense to me, and b) I wished to point out the pointlessness of using German on the English-language wikipedia. Have my doubts as to the helpfulness of the efforts, but someone's gotta try, no? [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] 03:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
917 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 914 +++$+++ 916 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.191957840E09 +++$+++ Actually, thanks for bringing it back to my notice. I had let it slip from my attention because Kay's new category was at least in English, wasn't overtly POV, and wasn't being inappropriately spammed all over creation. Thanks also for taking the time to comment.  +++$+++ :::Actually, thanks for bringing it back to my notice. I had let it slip from my attention because Kay's new category was at least in English, wasn't overtly POV, and wasn't being inappropriately spammed all over creation. Thanks also for taking the time to comment. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 12:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
918 +++$+++ CheNuevara +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 914 +++$+++ 914 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.191972840E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your concern. -  +++$+++ :Thanks again for your concern. - [[User:CheNuevara|Che Nuevara]] 16:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
919 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 914 +++$+++ 918 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.191975660E09 +++$+++ I suspect Madcynic is aware of Kay's conduct over time, as we frequent some of the same areas of interest, and he's likely seen Kay and I going back and forth at it. As I imagine have a number of other editors (a little to my embarassment). I appreciate his notice in this instance and if there's anyone who thinks he can straighten Kay away some, that would be a good thing. In the meantime I'm not inclined to just watch him do his POV thing and inflict poor English on articles as he sees fit.  +++$+++ :: I suspect Madcynic is aware of Kay's conduct over time, as we frequent some of the same areas of interest, and he's likely seen Kay and I going back and forth at it. As I imagine have a number of other editors (a little to my embarassment). I appreciate his notice in this instance and if there's anyone who thinks he can straighten Kay away some, that would be a good thing. In the meantime I'm not inclined to just watch him do his POV thing and inflict poor English on articles as he sees fit. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 17:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
920 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 914 +++$+++ 919 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.191989400E09 +++$+++ Yes, I indeed am aware of the edits - and I think I should clarify my statement insofar, as I do not object to using a foreign (i.e. other than English) language on the EL-wikipedia per se. I just believe that especially in cases such as this, where there is a lot of potential for conflict, sticking to English is more helpful in terms of allowing third persons to understand what is going on. I do realize what you were trying to do, Che, but as Wiggy! has pointed out before, I doubt it will have any success. Nevertheless, you go ahead and try.  +++$+++ :::Yes, I indeed am aware of the edits - and I think I should clarify my statement insofar, as I do not object to using a foreign (i.e. other than English) language on the EL-wikipedia per se. I just believe that especially in cases such as this, where there is a lot of potential for conflict, sticking to English is more helpful in terms of allowing third persons to understand what is going on. I do realize what you were trying to do, Che, but as Wiggy! has pointed out before, I doubt it will have any success. Nevertheless, you go ahead and try. [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] 21:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

437059 +++$+++ Zora +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-30 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.120133880E09 +++$+++ Marshman, it's not wrong to use the Unicode blahblah699 for an 'okina. Keola Donaghy, who ought to know, says that this is the form that they prefer for the UH Hilo Hawaiian language pubs and website. Probably because it doesn't get confused with the left quote, and hence can be found easily with search utilities.  +++$+++ Marshman, it's not wrong to use the Unicode blahblah699 for an 'okina. Keola Donaghy, who ought to know, says that this is the form that they prefer for the UH Hilo Hawaiian language pubs and website. Probably because it doesn't get confused with the left quote, and hence can be found easily with search utilities. [[User:Zora|Zora]] 30 June 2005 05:18 (UTC)
437060 +++$+++ Zora +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437059 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-07-07 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.120735140E09 +++$+++ Ah, him. He's been involved with computerization of Hawaiian for years, active in Punana Leo, on staff at UH Hilo, webmaster for UH Hilo Hawaiian dept. I worked with him briefly, years ago, starting the Usenet newsgroup soc.culture.hawaii. It's the only newsgroup on Usenet with a charter in English, pidgin, and Hawaiian.  +++$+++ :: Ah, him. He's been involved with computerization of Hawaiian for years, active in Punana Leo, on staff at UH Hilo, webmaster for UH Hilo Hawaiian dept. I worked with him briefly, years ago, starting the Usenet newsgroup soc.culture.hawaii. It's the only newsgroup on Usenet with a charter in English, pidgin, and Hawaiian. [[User:Zora|Zora]] 7 July 2005 04:19 (UTC)

263061 +++$+++ Phenylalanine +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-03 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.236109500E09 +++$+++ Hi, I need a third opinion. Could you comment on [[Talk:Paleolithic diet#Diet origin]]. Many thanks! -- +++$+++ Hi, I need a third opinion. Could you comment on [[Talk:Paleolithic diet#Diet origin]]. Many thanks! --[[User:Phenylalanine|Phenylalanine]] ([[User talk:Phenylalanine|talk]]) 11:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
263062 +++$+++ Phenylalanine +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263061 +++$+++ 263061 +++$+++ 2009-03-03 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.236151560E09 +++$+++ Thanks again. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks again. Cheers, [[User:Phenylalanine|Phenylalanine]] ([[User talk:Phenylalanine|talk]]) 23:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

263063 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263063 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-08 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.236542280E09 +++$+++ Howdy mate, thanks for those remarks on [[Talk:Meningitis]]. I've spent the whole morning implementing them. Hopefully you will be able to support the article's FA candidacy.  +++$+++ Howdy mate, thanks for those remarks on [[Talk:Meningitis]]. I've spent the whole morning implementing them. Hopefully you will be able to support the article's FA candidacy. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 12:58, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
263064 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263063 +++$+++ 263063 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.236584460E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I hadn't realised that there were going to be more comments! You certainly caught a nasty error in the section on pneumococcal vaccines; thanks for spotting that. Have fixed things now.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I hadn't realised that there were going to be more comments! You certainly caught a nasty error in the section on pneumococcal vaccines; thanks for spotting that. Have fixed things now. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 00:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
263065 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263063 +++$+++ 263063 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.236584520E09 +++$+++ And thanks for your support vote even though there were still some fixes to be made.  +++$+++ :And thanks for your support vote even though there were still some fixes to be made. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 00:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

921 +++$+++ CheNuevara +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-10 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.192067040E09 +++$+++ Now, I'm not defending him -- he's contentious and acting very problematically, and something needs to be done. But I honestly think he is immensely confused. Which is unfortunate, because he's going to wind up getting himself indefblocked here too. I'm not sure I know what to do about him, though. -  +++$+++ Now, I'm not defending him -- he's contentious and acting very problematically, and something needs to be done. But I honestly think he is immensely confused. Which is unfortunate, because he's going to wind up getting himself indefblocked here too. I'm not sure I know what to do about him, though. - [[User:CheNuevara|Che Nuevara]] 18:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
922 +++$+++ CheNuevara +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 921 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.192068960E09 +++$+++ I think that's about as clear as it gets. And he already apparently finds me sympathetic, so maybe there's a chance he'll take me seriously. If not, I wouldn't expect to see him around for too much longer -- he's bound to get himself in trouble more this way. -  +++$+++ :::I think that's about as clear as it gets. And he already apparently finds me sympathetic, so maybe there's a chance he'll take me seriously. If not, I wouldn't expect to see him around for too much longer -- he's bound to get himself in trouble more this way. - [[User:CheNuevara|Che Nuevara]] 19:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

525211 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-02 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.170461700E09 +++$+++ '''The Encephalon Cross''' <br\/>''For astonishing quantity of handy anatomical images added to many pages, I hearby (enviously) bequeath upon Arcadian the Encephalon Cross!''  +++$+++ '''The Encephalon Cross''' <br/>''For astonishing quantity of handy anatomical images added to many pages, I hearby (enviously) bequeath upon Arcadian the Encephalon Cross!'' [[User:WLU|WLU]] 16:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
525212 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525211 +++$+++ 525211 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.170514860E09 +++$+++ Thank you! -- +++$+++ :Thank you! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 07:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

924 +++$+++ -Lemmy- +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-18 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.192762860E09 +++$+++ Hello again! I need your help on [[Eintracht Frankfurt|my club]]'s song [[Im Herzen von Europa]]. I translated the lyrics from German to English but I guess there are some little mistakes or not plain translations in it.Feel free to change it.Thanks in  advance!  +++$+++ Hello again! I need your help on [[Eintracht Frankfurt|my club]]'s song [[Im Herzen von Europa]]. I translated the lyrics from German to English but I guess there are some little mistakes or not plain translations in it.Feel free to change it.Thanks in  advance! [[User:-Lemmy-|-Lemmy-]] 20:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
925 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 924 +++$+++ 924 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.192763700E09 +++$+++ I'll have a run at it (even though I'm not any kind of poet). Sounds like fun. :)  +++$+++ :I'll have a run at it (even though I'm not any kind of poet). Sounds like fun. :) [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 20:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
926 +++$+++ -Lemmy- +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 924 +++$+++ 925 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 10:26:00 +++$+++ 1.193160360E09 +++$+++ More poet than I am ;-) Thanks for your work!  +++$+++ ::More poet than I am ;-) Thanks for your work! [[User:-Lemmy-|-Lemmy-]] 10:26, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

525213 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-05 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.170666480E09 +++$+++ Hi, I saw you worked on [[Cardiac action potential]], I hope you can help me with someting. An IP removed two sections a while ago with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Cardiac_action_potential&diff=92205283&oldid=89542778 this] edit. Was that a good edit or vandalism? If vandalism, should it be restored? It's not my topic at all, so I don't know part of it is already rewritten or not.  +++$+++ Hi, I saw you worked on [[Cardiac action potential]], I hope you can help me with someting. An IP removed two sections a while ago with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cardiac_action_potential&diff=92205283&oldid=89542778 this] edit. Was that a good edit or vandalism? If vandalism, should it be restored? It's not my topic at all, so I don't know part of it is already rewritten or not. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 01:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
525214 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525213 +++$+++ 525213 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.170808320E09 +++$+++ From what I can tell, it was indeed vandalism, but much of the information that was lost on December 5th has since been re-added in a different form. -- +++$+++ :From what I can tell, it was indeed vandalism, but much of the information that was lost on December 5th has since been re-added in a different form. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 16:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
525215 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525213 +++$+++ 525214 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.170813300E09 +++$+++ Good, I am glad it's all in order again. Thanks for checking.  +++$+++ :: Good, I am glad it's all in order again. Thanks for checking. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 17:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

437061 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-01 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.120268820E09 +++$+++ But I'm not questioning whether unicode 699 is the right one or not.  There is a way to use unicode in Wikipedia articles that allows the readers to actually see it as an 'okina and not a box. I have no objection to that style as it accomplishes something. To simply replace all the 'okina in Hawaii articles with a box seems counterproductive to me. -  +++$+++ But I'm not questioning whether unicode 699 is the right one or not.  There is a way to use unicode in Wikipedia articles that allows the readers to actually see it as an 'okina and not a box. I have no objection to that style as it accomplishes something. To simply replace all the 'okina in Hawaii articles with a box seems counterproductive to me. - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 1 July 2005 18:47 (UTC)
437062 +++$+++ Zora +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437061 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-07-07 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.120735140E09 +++$+++ In other news, how about a meeting of Honolulu Wikipedians? Restaurant somewhere?  +++$+++ :: In other news, how about a meeting of Honolulu Wikipedians? Restaurant somewhere? [[User:Zora|Zora]] 7 July 2005 04:19 (UTC)
437063 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437061 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-07-07 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.120735560E09 +++$+++ A date! Actually, an interesting idea.  How many of us do you estimate there are? I'm game. I had a guy from SF get in touch with me a week or so ago while he was here visiting, but we got our signals screwed up and missed having a beer together. But your idea might really promote good feelings if we all know who the others are (hard to attack friends, right!) -  +++$+++ :::A date! Actually, an interesting idea.  How many of us do you estimate there are? I'm game. I had a guy from SF get in touch with me a week or so ago while he was here visiting, but we got our signals screwed up and missed having a beer together. But your idea might really promote good feelings if we all know who the others are (hard to attack friends, right!) - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 7 July 2005 04:26 (UTC)
437064 +++$+++ Zora +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437061 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-07-07 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.120742400E09 +++$+++ I'm a fat crippled geekette of advanced years and I don't do dates, but I like intelligent conversation. The only other Honolulu Wikipedian I know is Alex Golub. Do you know any others? Meeting at the Kim Chee II in Kaimuki? Cheap and big naugahyde booths? Or are you a vegetarian?  +++$+++ :::: I'm a fat crippled geekette of advanced years and I don't do dates, but I like intelligent conversation. The only other Honolulu Wikipedian I know is Alex Golub. Do you know any others? Meeting at the Kim Chee II in Kaimuki? Cheap and big naugahyde booths? Or are you a vegetarian? [[User:Zora|Zora]] 7 July 2005 06:20 (UTC)
437065 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437061 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-07-07 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.120783200E09 +++$+++ There is Gerald Farinas. He is in Honolulu, I believe. I eat anything, and Chinese is fine. -  +++$+++ :::::There is Gerald Farinas. He is in Honolulu, I believe. I eat anything, and Chinese is fine. - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 7 July 2005 17:40 (UTC)

928 +++$+++ Revolving Bugbear +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-04 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.194210420E09 +++$+++ Do we know this for a fact? Should we request a CheckUser? If it is the same person, then he's evading a block (which he may not actually know he's not supposed to do -- I'm still struggling to figure out just how much this guy understands -- although that is, of course, not an excuse), but I would hate to report this guy only to have it be a misunderstanding. -  +++$+++ Do we know this for a fact? Should we request a CheckUser? If it is the same person, then he's evading a block (which he may not actually know he's not supposed to do -- I'm still struggling to figure out just how much this guy understands -- although that is, of course, not an excuse), but I would hate to report this guy only to have it be a misunderstanding. - [[User:Revolving Bugbear|<font color="006666">Revolving Bugbear</font>]] (formerly '''Che Nuevara''') 13:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
929 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 928 +++$+++ 928 +++$+++ 2007-11-04 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.194211980E09 +++$+++ Yeah, its him. Exactly the same edit pattern and style, posting the same pics &etc. that go back months and months. If he follows pattern he'll start out all apologetic, beg for some help, go easy for a bit, but then be back to his old aggressive editing practises within a couple of weeks. He understands fully what he's doing.  +++$+++ :Yeah, its him. Exactly the same edit pattern and style, posting the same pics &etc. that go back months and months. If he follows pattern he'll start out all apologetic, beg for some help, go easy for a bit, but then be back to his old aggressive editing practises within a couple of weeks. He understands fully what he's doing. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 13:33, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

263073 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263073 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-23 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.237871700E09 +++$+++ All the best. Graham.  +++$+++ All the best. Graham. [[User:GrahamColm|Graham <font color="blue">Colm</font>]] [[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
263074 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263073 +++$+++ 263073 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.237874880E09 +++$+++ I've not had a chance to read the rest of Phagocyte today and tomorrow is looking busy too. I will finish reading\/reviewing it but don't wait for me for FAC if you think you are ready to go.  +++$+++ :I've not had a chance to read the rest of Phagocyte today and tomorrow is looking busy too. I will finish reading/reviewing it but don't wait for me for FAC if you think you are ready to go. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 23:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
263075 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263073 +++$+++ 263074 +++$+++ 2009-03-24 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.237916820E09 +++$+++ They eat them alive! It's worth watching if you have time, but I was disappointed with the narrator saying \"leukocytes\" and not \"phagocytes\". BTW our own phagocytes will eat our own sperm cells if we don't \"use\" them. But at least our phagocytes wait until they are dead. Graham.  +++$+++ ::They eat them alive! It's worth watching if you have time, but I was disappointed with the narrator saying "leukocytes" and not "phagocytes". BTW our own phagocytes will eat our own sperm cells if we don't "use" them. But at least our phagocytes wait until they are dead. Graham. [[User:GrahamColm|Graham <font color="blue">Colm</font>]] [[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 10:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
263076 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263073 +++$+++ 263075 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.238012400E09 +++$+++ Oh, my: the conversations I've missed while I've been busy and not paying attention !!!  (Do you ''really'' think one actually asked directions, or did it just get lucky and take all the right turns?)  Well, just dropped in to see what's up here because I've been so busy lately.  Best,  +++$+++ ::: Oh, my: the conversations I've missed while I've been busy and not paying attention !!!  (Do you ''really'' think one actually asked directions, or did it just get lucky and take all the right turns?)  Well, just dropped in to see what's up here because I've been so busy lately.  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 13:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

930 +++$+++ Revolving Bugbear +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-06 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.194411300E09 +++$+++ I thought you might be interested in seeing that. In the spirit of WP:BEANS, I'm wrestling with what to say to him about it. -  +++$+++ I thought you might be interested in seeing that. In the spirit of WP:BEANS, I'm wrestling with what to say to him about it. - [[User:Revolving Bugbear|<font color="006666">Revolving Bugbear</font>]] (formerly '''Che Nuevara''') 20:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
931 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 930 +++$+++ 930 +++$+++ 2007-11-06 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.194419640E09 +++$+++ Dunno what you might say that could help as Kay has made it clear as a bell that he's happy to ignore everyone here, unless he's doing the <nowiki>{{helpme}}<\/nowiki> thing, which always manages to draw in a couple of innocent folks, but good luck in any case. Thx again for the heads up. Keep well.  +++$+++ :Dunno what you might say that could help as Kay has made it clear as a bell that he's happy to ignore everyone here, unless he's doing the <nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki> thing, which always manages to draw in a couple of innocent folks, but good luck in any case. Thx again for the heads up. Keep well. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] 23:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
932 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 930 +++$+++ 930 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.196033160E09 +++$+++ And yes, it is no fun to be separated from one's books, but good work nonetheless. Keep well.  +++$+++ :And yes, it is no fun to be separated from one's books, but good work nonetheless. Keep well. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!|talk]]) 15:26, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

525220 +++$+++ Beetstra +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-10 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.171168140E09 +++$+++ Arcadian, could you try to (re)write the text in {{tl|chembox new}} on the subst-ing\/transclusion in such a way that it is clear?  To me it is completely transparent, but by now I am too deep into templates that I may not be able to explain it clearly anymore.  Thanks!  -- +++$+++ Arcadian, could you try to (re)write the text in {{tl|chembox new}} on the subst-ing/transclusion in such a way that it is clear?  To me it is completely transparent, but by now I am too deep into templates that I may not be able to explain it clearly anymore.  Thanks!  --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 20:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
525221 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525220 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.171177620E09 +++$+++ Do you mind if I remove the \"Section1\", etc., headers from the \"Small\/simple form\"? That's the part which still seems most counterintuitive to me, and is the hardest to explain to someone using it for the first time. It is an interesting idea (most other templates don't allow the user to alter the display order of the fields), but with the nested templates, it makes it harder to explain, and the template seems to work fine without them.  -- +++$+++ ::Do you mind if I remove the "Section1", etc., headers from the "Small/simple form"? That's the part which still seems most counterintuitive to me, and is the hardest to explain to someone using it for the first time. It is an interesting idea (most other templates don't allow the user to alter the display order of the fields), but with the nested templates, it makes it harder to explain, and the template seems to work fine without them.  --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
525222 +++$+++ Beetstra +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525220 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.171329720E09 +++$+++ Hope this explains a bit.  I'll have a look later.  Cheers!  -- +++$+++ :::Hope this explains a bit.  I'll have a look later.  Cheers!  --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 17:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
525223 +++$+++ Beetstra +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525220 +++$+++ 525220 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.171419120E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, chembox new understands 'MeSHName' in the Identifiers box .. keeps the external links away, which in its turn does not encourage more external links.  Keep up the good work, and see you around!  -- +++$+++ :Just to let you know, chembox new understands 'MeSHName' in the Identifiers box .. keeps the external links away, which in its turn does not encourage more external links.  Keep up the good work, and see you around!  --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 18:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
525224 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525220 +++$+++ 525223 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.171419360E09 +++$+++ I just tried the new parameter at [[Glycerol 3-phosphate]], and I couldn't quite get it to work -- would you mind taking a look? -- +++$+++ ::I just tried the new parameter at [[Glycerol 3-phosphate]], and I couldn't quite get it to work -- would you mind taking a look? --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 18:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
525225 +++$+++ Beetstra +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525220 +++$+++ 525224 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.171426800E09 +++$+++ Done, I used an 'urlencode' around the value to get rid of strange characters (mainly the } and the ] break an url), but that also endoded the +, which in this case is not necessary.  But it does now the same as the MeSH-template.  Thanks for pointing me to that, there are always some things to improve.  See you around!  -- +++$+++ :::Done, I used an 'urlencode' around the value to get rid of strange characters (mainly the } and the ] break an url), but that also endoded the +, which in this case is not necessary.  But it does now the same as the MeSH-template.  Thanks for pointing me to that, there are always some things to improve.  See you around!  --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 20:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
525226 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525220 +++$+++ 525225 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.171436100E09 +++$+++ Thanks! -- +++$+++ ::::Thanks! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

933 +++$+++ DMahalko +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 933 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-11 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.200064980E09 +++$+++ Yeah I suppose a disambiguation page isn't the best place for that complex history of the electric dynamo. The whole dynamo issue is annoying because people do not realize it was originally much more than an electrical generator, and really it was the source of many different rotating electrical devices. I've decided to take over the old [[Dynamo]] redirect and see about fleshing it out into a full article to discuss these ambiguities..  +++$+++ Yeah I suppose a disambiguation page isn't the best place for that complex history of the electric dynamo. The whole dynamo issue is annoying because people do not realize it was originally much more than an electrical generator, and really it was the source of many different rotating electrical devices. I've decided to take over the old [[Dynamo]] redirect and see about fleshing it out into a full article to discuss these ambiguities.. [[User:DMahalko|DMahalko]] ([[User talk:DMahalko|talk]]) 07:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
934 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 933 +++$+++ 933 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.200104400E09 +++$+++ Probably best. You added some interesting stuff that'll stand well on its own.  +++$+++ :Probably best. You added some interesting stuff that'll stand well on its own. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 18:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

129190 +++$+++ Robbytakac +++$+++ DanielRigal +++$+++ 129190 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-24 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.308977040E09 +++$+++ [[User:Robbytakac|Robbytakac]] ([[User talk:Robbytakac|talk]]) 21:44, 24 June 2011 (UTC)robbytakac +++$+++ [[User:Robbytakac|Robbytakac]] ([[User talk:Robbytakac|talk]]) 21:44, 24 June 2011 (UTC)robbytakac[[User:Robbytakac|Robbytakac]] ([[User talk:Robbytakac|talk]]) 21:44, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
129191 +++$+++ DanielRigal +++$+++ DanielRigal +++$+++ 129190 +++$+++ 129190 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.308979800E09 +++$+++ I have replied on your talk page. -- +++$+++ :I have replied on your talk page. --[[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal#top|talk]]) 22:30, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
129192 +++$+++ DanielRigal +++$+++ DanielRigal +++$+++ 129190 +++$+++ 129190 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.310951520E09 +++$+++ We need to have references in reliable sources, not conduct our own investigations. If there were a documented example of an artist being certified as mentally ill who was not, purely because of their art and that lead to their being murdered then it would certainly be well worth including it in the article. Trouble is that we don't have that example as yet. -- +++$+++ :We need to have references in reliable sources, not conduct our own investigations. If there were a documented example of an artist being certified as mentally ill who was not, purely because of their art and that lead to their being murdered then it would certainly be well worth including it in the article. Trouble is that we don't have that example as yet. --[[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal#top|talk]]) 18:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
129193 +++$+++ DanielRigal +++$+++ DanielRigal +++$+++ 129190 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310958840E09 +++$+++ It says \"Although '''officially''' no artists were put to death because of their work,\" (my emphasis) and it has a reference so I don't feel comfortable removing it. I don't have access to the reference material to check it. TBH it seems OK as it is. -- +++$+++ :::It says "Although '''officially''' no artists were put to death because of their work," (my emphasis) and it has a reference so I don't feel comfortable removing it. I don't have access to the reference material to check it. TBH it seems OK as it is. --[[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal#top|talk]]) 20:14, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

935 +++$+++ Revolving Bugbear +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-14 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.200368160E09 +++$+++ I will try to keep an eye on this situation. Please let me know if you decide to do anything in particular about this, as I will be happy to comment. -  +++$+++ I will try to keep an eye on this situation. Please let me know if you decide to do anything in particular about this, as I will be happy to comment. - [[User:Revolving Bugbear|<font color="006666">Revolving Bugbear</font>]] 19:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
936 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 935 +++$+++ 935 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.200374580E09 +++$+++ Kay floats a helpme about once every two months or so. He's blocked under several identities and is only occasionally re-appearing to do a little sock IP editing. Thank you for the notice and your offer of assistance. My guess\/hope is that this will fade away without too much fuss. Keep well.  +++$+++ :Kay floats a helpme about once every two months or so. He's blocked under several identities and is only occasionally re-appearing to do a little sock IP editing. Thank you for the notice and your offer of assistance. My guess/hope is that this will fade away without too much fuss. Keep well. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 21:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
937 +++$+++ Revolving Bugbear +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 935 +++$+++ 936 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.200376140E09 +++$+++ Yes, I've had the SVD page on watch since our last meeting, so I've noticed his antics. He does seem to be calming down, but hasn't quite given it up yet. Cheers, and happy wiki'ing. -  +++$+++ ::Yes, I've had the SVD page on watch since our last meeting, so I've noticed his antics. He does seem to be calming down, but hasn't quite given it up yet. Cheers, and happy wiki'ing. - [[User:Revolving Bugbear|<font color="006666">Revolving Bugbear</font>]] 21:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

263081 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-06 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.239085020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note; I am not at all bothered by your opinion, and in fact welcome it. The next change apparently, will be to remove Asperger's image entirely from Wikipedia, on separate grounds. See [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion\/2009 April 6#Hans Aspergersmall.jpg]]. No notice of this has been made at ''[[Hans Asperger]]''. The bottom line is that, regardless of what Wikipedia policy seems to say, non-free images should never be used. If I had known that ahead of time I could have saved myself the effort.  +++$+++ Thanks for the note; I am not at all bothered by your opinion, and in fact welcome it. The next change apparently, will be to remove Asperger's image entirely from Wikipedia, on separate grounds. See [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 April 6#Hans Aspergersmall.jpg]]. No notice of this has been made at ''[[Hans Asperger]]''. The bottom line is that, regardless of what Wikipedia policy seems to say, non-free images should never be used. If I had known that ahead of time I could have saved myself the effort. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] ([[User talk:Eubulides|talk]]) 23:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
263082 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263081 +++$+++ 263081 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.239085080E09 +++$+++ The best person to look at this is {{user|Elcobbola}}; I'll ping him.   +++$+++ : The best person to look at this is {{user|Elcobbola}}; I'll ping him.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
263083 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263081 +++$+++ 263082 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.239144000E09 +++$+++ Colin, see [[User_talk:Elcobbola#Asperger]]. Best,  +++$+++ :: Colin, see [[User_talk:Elcobbola#Asperger]]. Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

938 +++$+++ Revolving Bugbear +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-14 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.200381960E09 +++$+++ As a heads-up, I've 3RR warned Kay, but both of you have 3 reverts on the page. As much as I agree you're in the right here, be careful regarding 3RR -- I'd hate to see you get blocked, even for a short time, over this silliness. -  +++$+++ As a heads-up, I've 3RR warned Kay, but both of you have 3 reverts on the page. As much as I agree you're in the right here, be careful regarding 3RR -- I'd hate to see you get blocked, even for a short time, over this silliness. - [[User:Revolving Bugbear|<font color="006666">Revolving Bugbear</font>]] 23:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
939 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 938 +++$+++ 938 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.200382440E09 +++$+++ Thanks and thanks. I've been to the same edge with this fellow once before, but you're right, time to head off and do something productive. Be good.  +++$+++ :Thanks and thanks. I've been to the same edge with this fellow once before, but you're right, time to head off and do something productive. Be good. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 23:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

525227 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525227 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-12 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.171304460E09 +++$+++ How did you come to the conclusion the latter was the more common spelling? -  +++$+++ How did you come to the conclusion the latter was the more common spelling? - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 10:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
525228 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525227 +++$+++ 525227 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.171317780E09 +++$+++ Response at [[Talk:Gray matter]]. -- +++$+++ :Response at [[Talk:Gray matter]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 14:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

940 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 940 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-21 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.200958020E09 +++$+++ just a quick question: I modified an image (Image:Deutschland_Lage_von_Nordrhein-Westfalen.svg, creating Image:Deutschland_Lage_von_Westdeutschland.png) to highlight the area of the [[Regionalliga West]] but i'm not sure about the whole copyright thing. Will it be deleted, is it ok? It would be good if you could give me your opinion on it, Wiggy! Thanks, +++$+++ just a quick question: I modified an image (Image:Deutschland_Lage_von_Nordrhein-Westfalen.svg, creating Image:Deutschland_Lage_von_Westdeutschland.png) to highlight the area of the [[Regionalliga West]] but i'm not sure about the whole copyright thing. Will it be deleted, is it ok? It would be good if you could give me your opinion on it, Wiggy! Thanks,[[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 15:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
941 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 940 +++$+++ 940 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.200962400E09 +++$+++ By the way, I keep seeing you all over German football here at en:Wikipedia, and I have to say (once again) very nice work. You're making substantial contributions. Well done.  +++$+++ :By the way, I keep seeing you all over German football here at en:Wikipedia, and I have to say (once again) very nice work. You're making substantial contributions. Well done. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 16:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
942 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 940 +++$+++ 941 +++$+++ 2008-01-22 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.200996540E09 +++$+++ If you could create a sample for me by tagging this one, that would be great, Wiggy. Frankly, I find this copyright thing a little confusing at times. If I had a sample I could do simular images for the other Oberligas and Regionalligas, where needed. Thanks again for the praise, Wiggy, but I'm greatly enjoying writing about German football, especially about the leagues below the two Bundesligas, where information in English is hard to come by. I'm hoping to finish the Oberligas soon. Thanks also for tidying some of my club articles, especially the images, I couldn't get the [[SpVgg Lindau]] one sorted out, looks much better now! +++$+++ ::If you could create a sample for me by tagging this one, that would be great, Wiggy. Frankly, I find this copyright thing a little confusing at times. If I had a sample I could do simular images for the other Oberligas and Regionalligas, where needed. Thanks again for the praise, Wiggy, but I'm greatly enjoying writing about German football, especially about the leagues below the two Bundesligas, where information in English is hard to come by. I'm hoping to finish the Oberligas soon. Thanks also for tidying some of my club articles, especially the images, I couldn't get the [[SpVgg Lindau]] one sorted out, looks much better now![[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 02:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

263085 +++$+++ Jmh649 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263085 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-13 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.239685920E09 +++$+++ I was under the impression that creative commons were allowed?  Am I mistaken?  Thanks -- +++$+++ I was under the impression that creative commons were allowed?  Am I mistaken?  Thanks --[[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 22:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
263086 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263085 +++$+++ 263085 +++$+++ 2009-04-13 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.239688620E09 +++$+++ There are many CC licences, not all compatible with WP. See [[Wikipedia:Upload\/Flickr]] for some examples. The default licence on [http:\/\/radiopaedia.org\/terms radiopaedia] is CC-BY-NC-SA. Although WP is non-commercial, it requires the images are free of such restrictions.  +++$+++ :There are many CC licences, not all compatible with WP. See [[Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr]] for some examples. The default licence on [http://radiopaedia.org/terms radiopaedia] is CC-BY-NC-SA. Although WP is non-commercial, it requires the images are free of such restrictions. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

525230 +++$+++ Caerwine +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-13 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.171439580E09 +++$+++ Let me know if the latter is a problem and I'll stop doing that. <span style=\"font-family:cursive\"> +++$+++ Let me know if the latter is a problem and I'll stop doing that. <span style="font-family:cursive">[[User:Caerwine|Caerwine]]</span> [[User_talk:Caerwine|<small style="font-family:sans-serif;color:darkred">Caer’s whines</small>]] 23:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
525231 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525230 +++$+++ 525230 +++$+++ 2007-02-14 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.171440960E09 +++$+++ For the point #1 - thank you for identifying my error. I have fixed it. For point #2, that's a complicated issue, and I don't have an fully-formed opinion on it the moment, other than to ask you to make sure you consider the impact on other pages (like [[Bone]] -- scroll to the bottom). -- +++$+++ :For the point #1 - thank you for identifying my error. I have fixed it. For point #2, that's a complicated issue, and I don't have an fully-formed opinion on it the moment, other than to ask you to make sure you consider the impact on other pages (like [[Bone]] -- scroll to the bottom). --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 00:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

943 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 943 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-27 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.201423080E09 +++$+++ sorry to bother you with another question but you are a bit of an authority so maybe you now the answer. On quite a few occasitions, user betacommand added ''reflist'' to articles, thinking it will improve them, however, it messes them up as it does not remove ols references and they therefore appear twice. I made him aware of this but redeived no reply. I noted now that he continous to do so, still causing the same problem. Is there anything that can be done to stop him? He propably means well but doesn't seem to know what he is doing. Regards,  +++$+++ sorry to bother you with another question but you are a bit of an authority so maybe you now the answer. On quite a few occasitions, user betacommand added ''reflist'' to articles, thinking it will improve them, however, it messes them up as it does not remove ols references and they therefore appear twice. I made him aware of this but redeived no reply. I noted now that he continous to do so, still causing the same problem. Is there anything that can be done to stop him? He propably means well but doesn't seem to know what he is doing. Regards, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
944 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 943 +++$+++ 943 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.201430400E09 +++$+++ Catch you later.  +++$+++ :Catch you later. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 02:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
945 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 943 +++$+++ 944 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.201434480E09 +++$+++ I've got two current examples which I havn't bothered fixing up, they are [[Bezirksoberliga Schwaben]] and [[Bezirksliga Schwaben-Nord]], have a look when you got time. I repaired the other ones a couple of days ago. I had a look at his contributions and he seems to do this \"fix\" on a large scale. I also left him another message. To be fair, the way I originally did those reference lists on those articles is propably not of the highest quality but to my escuse I say didn't know any better. Anyway, have a look, let me know and I fix up the two articles after that again. Talk to you soon,  +++$+++ ::I've got two current examples which I havn't bothered fixing up, they are [[Bezirksoberliga Schwaben]] and [[Bezirksliga Schwaben-Nord]], have a look when you got time. I repaired the other ones a couple of days ago. I had a look at his contributions and he seems to do this "fix" on a large scale. I also left him another message. To be fair, the way I originally did those reference lists on those articles is propably not of the highest quality but to my escuse I say didn't know any better. Anyway, have a look, let me know and I fix up the two articles after that again. Talk to you soon, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 03:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
946 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 943 +++$+++ 945 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.201434960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. On our previous discussion, I'm working up what I hope will be a suitable fair use rationale\/license for your league maps and have attached the first version to the image in the [[Regionalliga West]] article. I'll tweak it a bit over the next little while and we'll see what reaction it draws. Its based on the criteria set out at Commons. Up to you to write the description that you think works best.  +++$+++ :::Thanks. On our previous discussion, I'm working up what I hope will be a suitable fair use rationale/license for your league maps and have attached the first version to the image in the [[Regionalliga West]] article. I'll tweak it a bit over the next little while and we'll see what reaction it draws. Its based on the criteria set out at Commons. Up to you to write the description that you think works best. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 03:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
947 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 943 +++$+++ 946 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.201436280E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Wiggy!, looks just fine, this will help me a lot in making simular maps for other German leagues. Danke Sch\xf6n!,  +++$+++ ::::Thanks, Wiggy!, looks just fine, this will help me a lot in making simular maps for other German leagues. Danke Schön!, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 04:18, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

525232 +++$+++ Michael Hardy +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-14 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.171511280E09 +++$+++ Why redirect [[strains]] to [[strain (injury)]] when the very title of the latter article suggests the existence of the [[strain]] disambiguation page?  If someone is looking for one of the many other topics under \"strain\", you'd prevent them from finding it.  (I've altered it so that \"strains\" redirects to \"strain\".)   +++$+++ Why redirect [[strains]] to [[strain (injury)]] when the very title of the latter article suggests the existence of the [[strain]] disambiguation page?  If someone is looking for one of the many other topics under "strain", you'd prevent them from finding it.  (I've altered it so that "strains" redirects to "strain".)  [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 19:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
525233 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525232 +++$+++ 525232 +++$+++ 2007-02-14 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.171511520E09 +++$+++ I made that redirect in 2005. Feel free to change as needed. -- +++$+++ :I made that redirect in 2005. Feel free to change as needed. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 19:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

263089 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263089 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-22 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.240461300E09 +++$+++ Did you see ''[http:\/\/www.channel4embarrassingillnesses.com\/ Embarrassing Bodies]'' on the telly tonight? It was so interesting. A poor little girl had the most dreadful case of [[verruca]]s\u2014a common viral infection of children caused by [[human papilloma virus]], and to which our immunity, usually, rapidly and effectively responds. It turned out that this little girl is not making enough [[T helper cell|lymphocytes]] in her [[bone marrow]] and so cannot fight [[virus|viral]] infections very well. It looks like she will get a bone marrow transplant at [[Great Ormond Street Hospital]] (an article that much deserves to be improved). No doubt we will be told more in next week's programme. In the end, her parents were grateful to the chronic verrucas, and logically the virus, without which, her condition would have gone unrecognised and would have lead to serious problems later in her life. Again, I was thinking, I hope Colin is watching this because he will be interested. The commentator called the [[lymphocytes]] \u2014''[[antibody|antibodies]]'', which annoyed me a little, but I forgive her; this is [[Channel 4]] after all. Best wishes. Graham.  +++$+++ Did you see ''[http://www.channel4embarrassingillnesses.com/ Embarrassing Bodies]'' on the telly tonight? It was so interesting. A poor little girl had the most dreadful case of [[verruca]]s—a common viral infection of children caused by [[human papilloma virus]], and to which our immunity, usually, rapidly and effectively responds. It turned out that this little girl is not making enough [[T helper cell|lymphocytes]] in her [[bone marrow]] and so cannot fight [[virus|viral]] infections very well. It looks like she will get a bone marrow transplant at [[Great Ormond Street Hospital]] (an article that much deserves to be improved). No doubt we will be told more in next week's programme. In the end, her parents were grateful to the chronic verrucas, and logically the virus, without which, her condition would have gone unrecognised and would have lead to serious problems later in her life. Again, I was thinking, I hope Colin is watching this because he will be interested. The commentator called the [[lymphocytes]] —''[[antibody|antibodies]]'', which annoyed me a little, but I forgive her; this is [[Channel 4]] after all. Best wishes. Graham. [[User:GrahamColm|Graham <font color="blue">Colm</font>]] [[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:35, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
263090 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263089 +++$+++ 263089 +++$+++ 2009-04-23 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.240548540E09 +++$+++ It is not a program I normally watch, but I caught it on 4oD. Why did she not succumb to a cold or diarrhoea? Is there something about HPV that those particular lymphocytes are needed for?  +++$+++ :It is not a program I normally watch, but I caught it on 4oD. Why did she not succumb to a cold or diarrhoea? Is there something about HPV that those particular lymphocytes are needed for? [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:49, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

525235 +++$+++ Question101 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525235 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-15 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.171535100E09 +++$+++ And while we are on the subject could you please tell me what nerve nodes are (or even point me to a wiki article)Thank you  +++$+++ And while we are on the subject could you please tell me what nerve nodes are (or even point me to a wiki article)Thank you [[User:Question101|Question101]] 02:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
525236 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525235 +++$+++ 525235 +++$+++ 2007-02-15 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.171535520E09 +++$+++ Welcome to Wikipedia! Sorry I don't have time for a longer answer right now -- for your first question, the [http:\/\/sg.answers.yahoo.com\/question\/index?qid=20070201100458AAEo4Ji second answer here] is reasonably accurate and non-technical. For your second question, my best guess is that you're referring to the [[Nodes of Ranvier]]. I'd also like to let you know about [[Wikipedia:Reference desk\/Science]] -- it's a great place to ask questions like these, and because there are so many people that watch those pages, it gives you the best chance of getting the information you're looking for. -- +++$+++ :Welcome to Wikipedia! Sorry I don't have time for a longer answer right now -- for your first question, the [http://sg.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070201100458AAEo4Ji second answer here] is reasonably accurate and non-technical. For your second question, my best guess is that you're referring to the [[Nodes of Ranvier]]. I'd also like to let you know about [[Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science]] -- it's a great place to ask questions like these, and because there are so many people that watch those pages, it gives you the best chance of getting the information you're looking for. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 02:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

558656 +++$+++ Jeffpw +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-17 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.176823080E09 +++$+++ Abu Badil removed the photo with the edit summary \"rm problematic commons image (source seems bogus)\". I do not know if the source is \"bogus' or not, as I did not upload it. I note, however, that it is the image used on the Dutch Princess Maxima article, and has been used for over 6 months without being deleted. Given that she is as important a person to Dutch society as Prince William would be to the British or Laura Bush would be to Americans, if there was a copyright problem with the image, I think the Dutch Wikipedia would have removed it long ago. I'd appreciate it if you could look at the image yourself and reach your own decision about it. If you don't see any problems with the image, please stop Abu Badil from deleting it again. Thank you.  +++$+++ Abu Badil removed the photo with the edit summary "rm problematic commons image (source seems bogus)". I do not know if the source is "bogus' or not, as I did not upload it. I note, however, that it is the image used on the Dutch Princess Maxima article, and has been used for over 6 months without being deleted. Given that she is as important a person to Dutch society as Prince William would be to the British or Laura Bush would be to Americans, if there was a copyright problem with the image, I think the Dutch Wikipedia would have removed it long ago. I'd appreciate it if you could look at the image yourself and reach your own decision about it. If you don't see any problems with the image, please stop Abu Badil from deleting it again. Thank you. [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] 08:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
558657 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558656 +++$+++ 558656 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.176838860E09 +++$+++ I've refered the image issue to [[User:Husky|Husky]] on Commons as he's a Dutch wiki admin and should be well placed to figure out whether that image meets GDFL requirements (and any discussions there may have been about this on Dutch wiki). <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ :I've refered the image issue to [[User:Husky|Husky]] on Commons as he's a Dutch wiki admin and should be well placed to figure out whether that image meets GDFL requirements (and any discussions there may have been about this on Dutch wiki). <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 12:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

949 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-19 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.203412920E09 +++$+++ writing the Landesliga Th\xfcringen article, I stumbled over this website, seems to be quite usefull, especially to somebody that likes writing German football club articles, have you used it before? [http:\/\/www.die-fans.de\/fussball\/vereine\/,Landesliga+Th%FCringen,26,league,,,,northeast Nordostfussball]. I only had a brief look but seems ok. +++$+++ writing the Landesliga Thüringen article, I stumbled over this website, seems to be quite usefull, especially to somebody that likes writing German football club articles, have you used it before? [http://www.die-fans.de/fussball/vereine/,Landesliga+Th%FCringen,26,league,,,,northeast Nordostfussball]. I only had a brief look but seems ok.[[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 01:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
950 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 949 +++$+++ 949 +++$+++ 2008-02-19 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.203473940E09 +++$+++ New to me. I'll go root around there some. Thanks for the tip!  +++$+++ :New to me. I'll go root around there some. Thanks for the tip! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 18:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

263094 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263094 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-25 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.243306320E09 +++$+++ i don't always go back to past afds, especially when I do not think my view will prevail, but I did happen to see your comment about my opinion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of extraordinary diseases and conditions]]. I've replied to it, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/List_of_extraordinary_diseases_and_conditions&diff=292282751&oldid=291991191]. As I mentioned there,  I was the  Princeton University Library specialist for over 30 years in just this sort of such material. Not arguing the afd, and I didn't think all that highly of the article in question, & I don't have time to redo it properly,  just trying to defend my reputation. ''' +++$+++ i don't always go back to past afds, especially when I do not think my view will prevail, but I did happen to see your comment about my opinion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of extraordinary diseases and conditions]]. I've replied to it, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_extraordinary_diseases_and_conditions&diff=292282751&oldid=291991191]. As I mentioned there,  I was the  Princeton University Library specialist for over 30 years in just this sort of such material. Not arguing the afd, and I didn't think all that highly of the article in question, & I don't have time to redo it properly,  just trying to defend my reputation. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 19:52, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
263095 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263094 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-25 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.243310640E09 +++$+++ no problem. Feel free to delete this. ''' +++$+++ ::no problem. Feel free to delete this. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 21:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

952 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.204706640E09 +++$+++ just happened to read the Dynamo article (or tried to), somebody really doesn't like you there! The english of the article is a shocker in places, and that sure must mean something, coming from me, a German! Anyway, what I really wanted to ask, do you know User: 194.95.142.179? He has made a heap of edits there and just resently edited the Regionalliga Nord article with some nonsens, have to clean it up now. Take care, all the best, +++$+++ just happened to read the Dynamo article (or tried to), somebody really doesn't like you there! The english of the article is a shocker in places, and that sure must mean something, coming from me, a German! Anyway, what I really wanted to ask, do you know User: 194.95.142.179? He has made a heap of edits there and just resently edited the Regionalliga Nord article with some nonsens, have to clean it up now. Take care, all the best,[[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
953 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 952 +++$+++ 952 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.204708500E09 +++$+++ I'd be happier and it would be better for us all if he could do the kind of work you do - good solid contribs and you're easy to work with. All the best to you, too, and keep up the good work. I'm always delighted to see what you have to add. Thanks for the note.  +++$+++ :I'd be happier and it would be better for us all if he could do the kind of work you do - good solid contribs and you're easy to work with. All the best to you, too, and keep up the good work. I'm always delighted to see what you have to add. Thanks for the note. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 01:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
954 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 952 +++$+++ 953 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.204710000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the warning, Wiggy!, I can see, he could be a difficult \"customer\". I guess it is very hard to bar somebody when they constantly change their IP address, he is obviously very determined. I just wrote an article on the [[DDR-Liga]] yesterday and edited the [[DDR-Oberliga]] one a little bit so I guess I can expect a visit soon! Thanks for the praise, Wiggy!, I will try to keep the standard up! Always a pleasure,  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the warning, Wiggy!, I can see, he could be a difficult "customer". I guess it is very hard to bar somebody when they constantly change their IP address, he is obviously very determined. I just wrote an article on the [[DDR-Liga]] yesterday and edited the [[DDR-Oberliga]] one a little bit so I guess I can expect a visit soon! Thanks for the praise, Wiggy!, I will try to keep the standard up! Always a pleasure, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 01:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

955 +++$+++ Revolving Bugbear +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-10 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.205198700E09 +++$+++ Three new articles this week. I think it may be time to move to [[WP:SSP]], and I'll be happy to be slammed as a \"Bundesb\xfcrger\" in my Wessi haven of Frankfurt. What do you think? -  +++$+++ Three new articles this week. I think it may be time to move to [[WP:SSP]], and I'll be happy to be slammed as a "Bundesbürger" in my Wessi haven of Frankfurt. What do you think? - [[User:Revolving Bugbear|<font color="006666">Revolving Bugbear</font>]] 18:25, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
956 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 955 +++$+++ 955 +++$+++ 2008-03-10 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.205200680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help. Greetings from [[Peterborough, Ontario]] Canada.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your help. Greetings from [[Peterborough, Ontario]] Canada. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 18:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
957 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 955 +++$+++ 956 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.205232120E09 +++$+++ I have created a section in the article titled \"Controversies surrounding the Sport Club Dynamo\", lets see wether he will let it stand! I wonder if he is tolerant enough to accept a well referenced section contrary to his world believe. I've researched a lot of sources, the amount of information regarding DDR-doping is overwhelming! Only used the most reliable sources, like BBC, The Guardian, etc. I also added a Dynamo section to the [[Doping (Sport)]]. +++$+++ ::I have created a section in the article titled "Controversies surrounding the Sport Club Dynamo", lets see wether he will let it stand! I wonder if he is tolerant enough to accept a well referenced section contrary to his world believe. I've researched a lot of sources, the amount of information regarding DDR-doping is overwhelming! Only used the most reliable sources, like BBC, The Guardian, etc. I also added a Dynamo section to the [[Doping (Sport)]].[[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 03:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
958 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 955 +++$+++ 957 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.205263200E09 +++$+++ Nope. Wiped out in short order. Not a surprise. Going to be a lot of work ...  +++$+++ :::Nope. Wiped out in short order. Not a surprise. Going to be a lot of work ... [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 12:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

525244 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-28 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.172711580E09 +++$+++ I noticed that your userboxes say that you speak some Spanish. I had cleaned up the article about the [[Seville Fair]] a few months ago, recently [[User:Saeta]] added several long paragraphs of raw Babelfish translation. I moved the additions to the [[Talk:Seville Fair|talk page]] and notified the user, who subsequently asked me to translate my comments into Spanish. I don't speak enough Spanish to do this, could you translate my comments [[User talk:Saeta]]? Or just get the gist across? And let her(?) know that I did keep the map in the article, and will attempt to translate the raw Babelfish. Thanks a bunch!!!-- +++$+++ I noticed that your userboxes say that you speak some Spanish. I had cleaned up the article about the [[Seville Fair]] a few months ago, recently [[User:Saeta]] added several long paragraphs of raw Babelfish translation. I moved the additions to the [[Talk:Seville Fair|talk page]] and notified the user, who subsequently asked me to translate my comments into Spanish. I don't speak enough Spanish to do this, could you translate my comments [[User talk:Saeta]]? Or just get the gist across? And let her(?) know that I did keep the map in the article, and will attempt to translate the raw Babelfish. Thanks a bunch!!!--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 17:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
525245 +++$+++ Saeta +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525244 +++$+++ 525244 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.172714280E09 +++$+++ Hola Arcadian, en primer lugar disculpa mi ingl\xe9s, que no es muy bueno. Soy [[User:Saeta|Saeta]] en la wikipedia en ingl\xe9s, en la wiki espa\xf1ola soy [[es:Usuario:Lobillo|Lobillo]], he visto que [[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] inici\xf3 el art\xedculo sobre la [[Seville Fair]] ([[es:Feria de Abril (Sevilla)|Feria de Abril]]) de [[Seville|Sevilla]], veo que se ha puesto en contacto contigo para ver si puedes traducir lo que hice con el traductor \"Babelfish\" (parece que he liberado al diablo) al intentar a\xf1adir informaci\xf3n sobre la misma pero en ingl\xe9s (en espa\xf1ol ya lo hice yo solito pr\xe1cticamente con ese art\xedculo y muchos sobre [[es:Sevilla|Sevilla]]. Tambi\xe9n le \"intent\xe9\" preguntar si el plano de la Feria (Image:FeriaDeAbrilSevilla.jpg) no era v\xe1lido (estoy seguro que es muy v\xe1lido) y tambi\xe9n si conoc\xeda la Feria en Sevilla, pero parece ser que no me entendi\xf3. Ahora te preguto directamente a ti, que s\xe9 que sabes un poco de espa\xf1ol, \xbfpodr\xedas traducir lo que puso en la [[Talk:Seville Fair|talk page]] sobre la Feria en ingl\xe9s?, muchas gracias por tu respuesta. Un saludo. -- +++$+++ :Hola Arcadian, en primer lugar disculpa mi inglés, que no es muy bueno. Soy [[User:Saeta|Saeta]] en la wikipedia en inglés, en la wiki española soy [[es:Usuario:Lobillo|Lobillo]], he visto que [[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] inició el artículo sobre la [[Seville Fair]] ([[es:Feria de Abril (Sevilla)|Feria de Abril]]) de [[Seville|Sevilla]], veo que se ha puesto en contacto contigo para ver si puedes traducir lo que hice con el traductor "Babelfish" (parece que he liberado al diablo) al intentar añadir información sobre la misma pero en inglés (en español ya lo hice yo solito prácticamente con ese artículo y muchos sobre [[es:Sevilla|Sevilla]]. También le "intenté" preguntar si el plano de la Feria (Image:FeriaDeAbrilSevilla.jpg) no era válido (estoy seguro que es muy válido) y también si conocía la Feria en Sevilla, pero parece ser que no me entendió. Ahora te preguto directamente a ti, que sé que sabes un poco de español, ¿podrías traducir lo que puso en la [[Talk:Seville Fair|talk page]] sobre la Feria en inglés?, muchas gracias por tu respuesta. Un saludo. --[[User:Saeta|Saeta]] 17:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
525246 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525244 +++$+++ 525245 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.172747100E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but I don't think I speak spanish well enough to be of service here. -- +++$+++ ::I'm sorry, but I don't think I speak spanish well enough to be of service here. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 03:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

263101 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263101 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-01 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.249157400E09 +++$+++ I have nominated [[List of brain tumor patients]] for [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates\/List of brain tumor patients\/archive1|featured list removal here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured list?|featured list criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to \"Keep\" or \"Remove\" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates|here]].  +++$+++ I have nominated [[List of brain tumor patients]] for [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of brain tumor patients/archive1|featured list removal here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured list?|featured list criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates|here]]. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 13:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
263102 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263101 +++$+++ 263101 +++$+++ 2009-08-01 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.249185360E09 +++$+++ I hope you can work on this, as Durova (the other main contributor) has effectively given up on the page. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I hope you can work on this, as Durova (the other main contributor) has effectively given up on the page. Cheers, [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 20:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

959 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.205324400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the article, Wiggy, it was on my to-do-list, for quite a while! Unfortunatly I didn't find the clubs website to informativ. I find club articles a lot harder to write then leagues! +++$+++ Thanks for the article, Wiggy, it was on my to-do-list, for quite a while! Unfortunatly I didn't find the clubs website to informativ. I find club articles a lot harder to write then leagues![[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 05:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
960 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 959 +++$+++ 959 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.205349900E09 +++$+++ My pleasure. You're right about the club's website, but I'm working from a copy of Vereinslexikon, - which helps hugely - and the German language Wikipedia articles. I wandered around through the league articles last night and updated a few of the templates to link to existing club articles. I'm blown away by how much league stuff you've assembled - you've clearly got some good source material there at least!  +++$+++ :My pleasure. You're right about the club's website, but I'm working from a copy of Vereinslexikon, - which helps hugely - and the German language Wikipedia articles. I wandered around through the league articles last night and updated a few of the templates to link to existing club articles. I'm blown away by how much league stuff you've assembled - you've clearly got some good source material there at least! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 12:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

525248 +++$+++ DRosenbach +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-02 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.172897520E09 +++$+++ I feel that the [[Template:Oral pathology|template navigation box for oral pathology]] is, objectively, a little skewed in terms of its content.  It seems to focus on things that lay people would tend to focus on, and veers from actually including anything that would be taught in any real depth in an oral path course.  Yes, [[User:Dozenist]] peppered in some technical terms that are anomoly highlights of a dental anatomy course, but in reality, it seems a little silly that the nav box categorizes and lists things in such an unsually unencyclopedic fashion.  I mean the staples of dental pathology, like [[odontogenic keratocyst|odontogenic keratocysts]], [[eosinophilic ulcer]], [[candidiasis]], [[fibrous dysplasia]] and [[Kaposi sarcoma]] are either absent or put in a day or so ago by myself.  However, these entities are focused on in oral path because of their extreme, diagnostic or even pathognomonic oral symptoms.  At the same time, many can occur anywhere in the body.  What are your thoughts about this? ''' +++$+++ I feel that the [[Template:Oral pathology|template navigation box for oral pathology]] is, objectively, a little skewed in terms of its content.  It seems to focus on things that lay people would tend to focus on, and veers from actually including anything that would be taught in any real depth in an oral path course.  Yes, [[User:Dozenist]] peppered in some technical terms that are anomoly highlights of a dental anatomy course, but in reality, it seems a little silly that the nav box categorizes and lists things in such an unsually unencyclopedic fashion.  I mean the staples of dental pathology, like [[odontogenic keratocyst|odontogenic keratocysts]], [[eosinophilic ulcer]], [[candidiasis]], [[fibrous dysplasia]] and [[Kaposi sarcoma]] are either absent or put in a day or so ago by myself.  However, these entities are focused on in oral path because of their extreme, diagnostic or even pathognomonic oral symptoms.  At the same time, many can occur anywhere in the body.  What are your thoughts about this? '''[[User:DRosenbach|DRosenbach]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:DRosenbach|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/DRosenbach|Contribs]])</sup> 20:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
525249 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525248 +++$+++ 525248 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.172899620E09 +++$+++ Responded at [[Template talk:Oral pathology]]. -- +++$+++ :Responded at [[Template talk:Oral pathology]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 21:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

961 +++$+++ Revolving Bugbear +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 961 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-13 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.205465280E09 +++$+++ [[WP:AN#SV Dynamo and multi-indef-blocked User:Kay K\xf6rner]]. -  +++$+++ [[WP:AN#SV Dynamo and multi-indef-blocked User:Kay Körner]]. - [[User:Revolving Bugbear|<font color="006666">Revolving Bugbear</font>]] 20:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
962 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 961 +++$+++ 961 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.205465940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the info.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the info. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 20:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

263106 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263106 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-21 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.250919540E09 +++$+++ Colin, I'm sorry I missed that AFD the first time through: it was immediately after my surgery.  I'm still confused at why it was closed as no consensus, as the Keeps were so easily rebutted, but I guess that's why I'm dismal at Afd.  Best,  +++$+++ Colin, I'm sorry I missed that AFD the first time through: it was immediately after my surgery.  I'm still confused at why it was closed as no consensus, as the Keeps were so easily rebutted, but I guess that's why I'm dismal at Afd.  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
263107 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263106 +++$+++ 263106 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.250919960E09 +++$+++ You are not alone. See [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\/Log\/2009 May 26]].  +++$+++ :You are not alone. See [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 May 26]]. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
263108 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263106 +++$+++ 263107 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.250922540E09 +++$+++ Sheesh.  What else did I miss in May and June?   +++$+++ :: Sheesh.  What else did I miss in May and June?  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

525252 +++$+++ DRosenbach +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525252 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-07 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.173308160E09 +++$+++ Hi again.  I have an issue regarding verifiability.  I would like to enter some information about the relationship of a pentagram and a magic square, but the people who watch and constantly edit [[pentagram]] are being, what I feel as, too strict.  So, I would instead like to place this information in the [[Lionel Ziprin]] article.  However, because my information is only verified by a private personal tutorial that occurred in 1962, and I could no find anything similar on the web, I was told that this was not enough.  However, I feel that this information is objectively related, whether or not the reasoning behind the relationship is to be believed; the steps to completing the magic square do in fact follow the pentagram.  As I am the editor of the Ziprin page for this information, I feel that this information is not controversial enough, such that I can support it with perhaps a less than entirely adequate verifiability requirement, as most pages and bits of information   fall under as well.  Please let me know what you think after checking out the part about the Jewish\/magic square relationship to the pentagram at the bottom of the [[Talk:pentagram]] page. ''' +++$+++ Hi again.  I have an issue regarding verifiability.  I would like to enter some information about the relationship of a pentagram and a magic square, but the people who watch and constantly edit [[pentagram]] are being, what I feel as, too strict.  So, I would instead like to place this information in the [[Lionel Ziprin]] article.  However, because my information is only verified by a private personal tutorial that occurred in 1962, and I could no find anything similar on the web, I was told that this was not enough.  However, I feel that this information is objectively related, whether or not the reasoning behind the relationship is to be believed; the steps to completing the magic square do in fact follow the pentagram.  As I am the editor of the Ziprin page for this information, I feel that this information is not controversial enough, such that I can support it with perhaps a less than entirely adequate verifiability requirement, as most pages and bits of information   fall under as well.  Please let me know what you think after checking out the part about the Jewish/magic square relationship to the pentagram at the bottom of the [[Talk:pentagram]] page. '''[[User:DRosenbach|DRosenbach]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:DRosenbach|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/DRosenbach|Contribs]])</sup> 14:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
525253 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525252 +++$+++ 525252 +++$+++ 2007-03-07 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.173310200E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure if I can help you -- I'm a strong supporter of the [[Wikipedia:Attribution]] policy, and in my googling, the best I could find was [http:\/\/mathworld.wolfram.com\/MagicGraph.html this], which is a very reliable source, but which seems to refer to [[Magic star]], which I don't think relates to what you wanted to add. So the best I can suggest is this: I'm sure you've already tried a google search on websites, but try [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?q=%22magic+square%22+kabbalah Google book search] (or the equivalent feature on Amazon). If you can't come up with anything, then perhaps the information would be more appropriate at a wiki with different inclusion policies. Here's one: http:\/\/kabbalah.wikia.com\/wiki\/Main_Page . I'm sure there are others. -- +++$+++ :I'm not sure if I can help you -- I'm a strong supporter of the [[Wikipedia:Attribution]] policy, and in my googling, the best I could find was [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MagicGraph.html this], which is a very reliable source, but which seems to refer to [[Magic star]], which I don't think relates to what you wanted to add. So the best I can suggest is this: I'm sure you've already tried a google search on websites, but try [http://books.google.com/books?q=%22magic+square%22+kabbalah Google book search] (or the equivalent feature on Amazon). If you can't come up with anything, then perhaps the information would be more appropriate at a wiki with different inclusion policies. Here's one: http://kabbalah.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page . I'm sure there are others. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 15:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

263109 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263109 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-23 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.251059100E09 +++$+++ So, having said all this, (and probably too much I suspect), we will only know if the vaccine works by testing it for safety, immunogenicity and protection first in mice and ferrets and eventually humans in clinical trials. If it works, it won't be a cheap vaccine, quite the opposite I suspect, and by the time all of the necessary testing and trials have been completed, the 2009 swine flu pandemic will be history.  Best wishes, Graham.  +++$+++ So, having said all this, (and probably too much I suspect), we will only know if the vaccine works by testing it for safety, immunogenicity and protection first in mice and ferrets and eventually humans in clinical trials. If it works, it won't be a cheap vaccine, quite the opposite I suspect, and by the time all of the necessary testing and trials have been completed, the 2009 swine flu pandemic will be history.  Best wishes, Graham. [[User:GrahamColm|Graham <font color="blue">Colm</font>]] [[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 13:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
263110 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263109 +++$+++ 263109 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.251063720E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Graham. Very interesting but also disappointing I suppose. I don't think I've ever had flu (bedridden and all that) and guess I'll be fairly low on the priority list for vaccination this year.  +++$+++ :Thanks, Graham. Very interesting but also disappointing I suppose. I don't think I've ever had flu (bedridden and all that) and guess I'll be fairly low on the priority list for vaccination this year. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 14:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

966 +++$+++ Punkmorten +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 966 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-24 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.206415080E09 +++$+++ I think you might know something about this [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/SV Nord Lerchenau]].  +++$+++ I think you might know something about this [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SV Nord Lerchenau]]. [[User:Punkmorten|Punkmorten]] ([[User talk:Punkmorten|talk]]) 20:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
967 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 966 +++$+++ 966 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.206417300E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I appreciate the heads up. I came across this earlier and was going to check into the club's history. At this point I'm working primarily at defending articles for those clubs who have played at fourth level and above if an issue arises. That causes some significant spill over down into the fifth division which makes it worth sticking up for that stuff, too, especially now that there are articles in place for all the teams currently playing at or above the Oberliga (IV) level. The introduction of the 3. Liga will probably stir things up some next season. I'll look into where Lerchenau is at (or was) and see if they are in any way significant or if there is a chance to expand the article. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Thanks, I appreciate the heads up. I came across this earlier and was going to check into the club's history. At this point I'm working primarily at defending articles for those clubs who have played at fourth level and above if an issue arises. That causes some significant spill over down into the fifth division which makes it worth sticking up for that stuff, too, especially now that there are articles in place for all the teams currently playing at or above the Oberliga (IV) level. The introduction of the 3. Liga will probably stir things up some next season. I'll look into where Lerchenau is at (or was) and see if they are in any way significant or if there is a chance to expand the article. Thanks again. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 20:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

525255 +++$+++ Occultations +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525255 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-15 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.173979320E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Occultations|Occultations]] 10:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
525256 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525255 +++$+++ 525255 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.174255500E09 +++$+++ I think the image (\"Image:Holliday Junction.png\") is a reasonable approximation of something that is hard to represent in two dimensions, but I agree that it could be better, and more images\/animations would be useful. I've added some links to external sites containing animations of the process. If you feel the existing image is misleading, and think it would be better off deleted, or if you feel it would be better with an explanatory note added to the caption, feel free to make the needed changes. -- +++$+++ :I think the image ("Image:Holliday Junction.png") is a reasonable approximation of something that is hard to represent in two dimensions, but I agree that it could be better, and more images/animations would be useful. I've added some links to external sites containing animations of the process. If you feel the existing image is misleading, and think it would be better off deleted, or if you feel it would be better with an explanatory note added to the caption, feel free to make the needed changes. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 15:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

968 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 968 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-13 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.208081820E09 +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, first of all, sorry to see the Leafs miss out on the play-offs, you might have to wait another year. I actually went to see some ice hockey (in Australia!), in Newcastle, Australia versus Spain, it was real good! I hadn't seen a game for years. Anyway, I saw your new BCA article and I'm not sure a separate article is needed. Most people in Augsburg actully feel that the FCA is a direct continuation of BCA, not a separate entity. The TSV Schwaben supporters never felt the FCA represented this club too. The main reason for this is that the traditional home of BCA in the north of Augsburg became the base for the new club and the Schwaben side of the club in the south of the city was ignored. There actually is a new BC Augsburg-Oberhausen which claims the name of the old BCA and seems to be doing alright in the [http:\/\/www.fussball.de\/fussball\/servlet\/content\/62?next=\/0708\/013\/052\/033\/310260&tag=50001 Kreisliga Schwaben-Augsburg], leading the league and looking for promotion to the Bezirksliga. I can't find a logo so I don't know how close the conection is. But the suburb Oberhausen is were the old BCA once started. Anyway, two separate articles won't do any harm, I moved a few little things across to the new page which belong to the old club. Have fun, +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, first of all, sorry to see the Leafs miss out on the play-offs, you might have to wait another year. I actually went to see some ice hockey (in Australia!), in Newcastle, Australia versus Spain, it was real good! I hadn't seen a game for years. Anyway, I saw your new BCA article and I'm not sure a separate article is needed. Most people in Augsburg actully feel that the FCA is a direct continuation of BCA, not a separate entity. The TSV Schwaben supporters never felt the FCA represented this club too. The main reason for this is that the traditional home of BCA in the north of Augsburg became the base for the new club and the Schwaben side of the club in the south of the city was ignored. There actually is a new BC Augsburg-Oberhausen which claims the name of the old BCA and seems to be doing alright in the [http://www.fussball.de/fussball/servlet/content/62?next=/0708/013/052/033/310260&tag=50001 Kreisliga Schwaben-Augsburg], leading the league and looking for promotion to the Bezirksliga. I can't find a logo so I don't know how close the conection is. But the suburb Oberhausen is were the old BCA once started. Anyway, two separate articles won't do any harm, I moved a few little things across to the new page which belong to the old club. Have fun,[[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 03:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
969 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 968 +++$+++ 968 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.208132520E09 +++$+++ Nice to hear from you, thanks for your comments. Keep well.  +++$+++ :Nice to hear from you, thanks for your comments. Keep well. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 17:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
970 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 968 +++$+++ 969 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.208158680E09 +++$+++ BCA - FCA can be seen either way, two clubs or just one but I keep an eye on the \"new\" BCA-Oberhausen, its actually been around for many years. I'm quite curious wether it claims the old logo or not, that would be a deciding factor in my opinion. Enjoy spring and the melting snow, greetings, +++$+++ ::BCA - FCA can be seen either way, two clubs or just one but I keep an eye on the "new" BCA-Oberhausen, its actually been around for many years. I'm quite curious wether it claims the old logo or not, that would be a deciding factor in my opinion. Enjoy spring and the melting snow, greetings,[[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

437068 +++$+++ Bebop +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437068 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-20 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.121892240E09 +++$+++ On the talk page for the [[watermelon]] article, I mentioned that a fact about it being a fruit, explained on the talk page by a biology specialist, probably had a source citation already documented by you when you made a Sep. 2004 edit adding fruit info and a source at the bottom of the article (the citation remains in the article). I am writing here to check whether that source you added did in fact take care of documenting a source for that issue of whether it is classified as a fruit or vegetable, but I don't have the book you used for a reference to look at. The reason it came up is that yesterday another person had changed the text to say it is a vegetable, not a fruit. I reverted that, but wanted to make sure we had sourced the info definitively that described it as a fruit since I've seen a couple of minor, non-academic sources that said otherwise. Most sources I've seen mention it being a fruit, but they are mostly sources on the history rather than the biology of the plant. You could reply at the article talk page or here, either one.  +++$+++ On the talk page for the [[watermelon]] article, I mentioned that a fact about it being a fruit, explained on the talk page by a biology specialist, probably had a source citation already documented by you when you made a Sep. 2004 edit adding fruit info and a source at the bottom of the article (the citation remains in the article). I am writing here to check whether that source you added did in fact take care of documenting a source for that issue of whether it is classified as a fruit or vegetable, but I don't have the book you used for a reference to look at. The reason it came up is that yesterday another person had changed the text to say it is a vegetable, not a fruit. I reverted that, but wanted to make sure we had sourced the info definitively that described it as a fruit since I've seen a couple of minor, non-academic sources that said otherwise. Most sources I've seen mention it being a fruit, but they are mostly sources on the history rather than the biology of the plant. You could reply at the article talk page or here, either one. [[User:Bebop|Bebop]] 13:44, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
437069 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437068 +++$+++ 437068 +++$+++ 2005-07-26 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.122424680E09 +++$+++ You are right. Anyone that thinks a watermellon is not a fruit, will find no support in biology or culinary arts. I will go look at the article. -  +++$+++ :You are right. Anyone that thinks a watermellon is not a fruit, will find no support in biology or culinary arts. I will go look at the article. - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 17:38, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

251401 +++$+++ HelpMeRhonda213 +++$+++ Jmj713 +++$+++ 251401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-22 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.303533660E09 +++$+++ Hey, I saw you edited the Dark Tower Series page. I was just wondering if you were a fan of the series? +++$+++ Hey, I saw you edited the Dark Tower Series page. I was just wondering if you were a fan of the series?[[User:HelpMeRhonda213|Rhonda]] ([[User talk:HelpMeRhonda213|talk]]) 21:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
251402 +++$+++ Jmj713 +++$+++ Jmj713 +++$+++ 251401 +++$+++ 251401 +++$+++ 2011-04-22 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.303541160E09 +++$+++ Of course.  +++$+++ :Of course. [[User:Jmj713|Jmj713]] ([[User talk:Jmj713#top|talk]]) 23:46, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

525259 +++$+++ Scientizzle +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525259 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-22 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.174617540E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for picking up some of my slack on [[Dopamine receptor]]. I'm slowly chipping away at the article; hopefully I can get it up to the comprehensive, useful level such a topic deserves... --  +++$+++ Hey, thanks for picking up some of my slack on [[Dopamine receptor]]. I'm slowly chipping away at the article; hopefully I can get it up to the comprehensive, useful level such a topic deserves... -- [[User:Scientizzle|Scientizzle]] 19:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
525260 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525259 +++$+++ 525259 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.174618800E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the kind words, and thank you for being so meticulous about referencing the published literature in your edits on that page. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the kind words, and thank you for being so meticulous about referencing the published literature in your edits on that page. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 20:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

972 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 972 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-17 08:13:00 +++$+++ 1.208445180E09 +++$+++ Have fun,  +++$+++ Have fun, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 08:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
973 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 972 +++$+++ 972 +++$+++ 2008-04-18 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.208561700E09 +++$+++ Another fine bit of work. I love to see all these additions.  +++$+++ :Another fine bit of work. I love to see all these additions. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 16:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

974 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-18 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.208555640E09 +++$+++ Hi Wiggy, its me again, asking a favor. When you get time, can you look at [[TSV 1860 Rosenheim]] and see if you can fix the logo? No rush, but I know you are much better then me at this. You fixed [[SpVgg Lindau]] and so on. Doesn't look all that great right now, I have to say. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Wiggy, its me again, asking a favor. When you get time, can you look at [[TSV 1860 Rosenheim]] and see if you can fix the logo? No rush, but I know you are much better then me at this. You fixed [[SpVgg Lindau]] and so on. Doesn't look all that great right now, I have to say. Thanks, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 14:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
975 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 974 +++$+++ 974 +++$+++ 2008-04-18 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.208561520E09 +++$+++ No trouble. Will do.  +++$+++ :No trouble. Will do. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 16:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
976 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 974 +++$+++ 975 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.212003660E09 +++$+++ Finally!  +++$+++ ::Finally! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 12:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

525263 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-27 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.175054700E09 +++$+++ Even without the first two points, the last is enough to make the .png an image of lesser quality.  +++$+++ Even without the first two points, the last is enough to make the .png an image of lesser quality. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 21:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
525264 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525263 +++$+++ 525263 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.175055540E09 +++$+++ I disagree, but if you want to change it back, I won't stand in your way. -- +++$+++ :I disagree, but if you want to change it back, I won't stand in your way. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 21:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

977 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-30 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.209542520E09 +++$+++ It's been pretty quite lately from you, are you suffering from wikipedia-disilusion, Wiggy? It happens, I guess. Or are you just taking a breather before the end-of-the season rush comes on? In any case, hope you are all good, have fun,  +++$+++ It's been pretty quite lately from you, are you suffering from wikipedia-disilusion, Wiggy? It happens, I guess. Or are you just taking a breather before the end-of-the season rush comes on? In any case, hope you are all good, have fun, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 01:02, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
978 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 977 +++$+++ 977 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.209544740E09 +++$+++ No, just kinda busy. Getting ready to re-open my park, taking some training courses, busy clearing trees from a hydro line - all kinds of stuff to do now that the weather is shaping up. Not in any way disillusioned with Wikipedia and still enjoying small amounts of Wiki time, keeping track of the odd bit here and there. Just too much to do right now. Haven't even had time to hang out with my Wappen buddies. Should drop them a line and let them know I'm still among the living. Thanks for asking.  +++$+++ :No, just kinda busy. Getting ready to re-open my park, taking some training courses, busy clearing trees from a hydro line - all kinds of stuff to do now that the weather is shaping up. Not in any way disillusioned with Wikipedia and still enjoying small amounts of Wiki time, keeping track of the odd bit here and there. Just too much to do right now. Haven't even had time to hang out with my Wappen buddies. Should drop them a line and let them know I'm still among the living. Thanks for asking. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 01:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

263122 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-25 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.256485980E09 +++$+++ I noticed the discussion on the Obesity FAC wrt product packaging. I've got [[Ketogenic diet]] going through peer review with an aim to go to FAC soon. I'm now concerned that [[:File:Liquigen.jpg]] may fail the copyright test as the label isn't totally utilitarian. Am I right in thinking that [[:File:Measuring Ketocal.jpg]] escapes the problem? If the liquigen photo has to go, what ways can I re-compose the image (other than one similar to the Ketocal one)? Thanks.  +++$+++ I noticed the discussion on the Obesity FAC wrt product packaging. I've got [[Ketogenic diet]] going through peer review with an aim to go to FAC soon. I'm now concerned that [[:File:Liquigen.jpg]] may fail the copyright test as the label isn't totally utilitarian. Am I right in thinking that [[:File:Measuring Ketocal.jpg]] escapes the problem? If the liquigen photo has to go, what ways can I re-compose the image (other than one similar to the Ketocal one)? Thanks. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 08:53, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
263123 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263122 +++$+++ 263122 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.256489700E09 +++$+++ The Measuring Ketocal image would be fine because the bottle is not the main focus of the image. The Liquigen bottle is borderline; an image of the bottle with no label would certainly be usable and even the bottle as shown with the label probably doesn't meet the [[threshold of originality]] to attract copyright.  +++$+++ :The Measuring Ketocal image would be fine because the bottle is not the main focus of the image. The Liquigen bottle is borderline; an image of the bottle with no label would certainly be usable and even the bottle as shown with the label probably doesn't meet the [[threshold of originality]] to attract copyright. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 09:55, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

979 +++$+++ Novidmarana +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-07 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.210215960E09 +++$+++ Hi, I nominated [[Template:Kinds of sport and sport associations of the SV Dynamo]] for deletion. You can probably guess who created this template. Your input on the deletion discussion would be appreciated.  +++$+++ Hi, I nominated [[Template:Kinds of sport and sport associations of the SV Dynamo]] for deletion. You can probably guess who created this template. Your input on the deletion discussion would be appreciated. [[User:Novidmarana|Novidmarana]] ([[User talk:Novidmarana|talk]]) 20:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
980 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 979 +++$+++ 979 +++$+++ 2008-05-09 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.210377240E09 +++$+++ As I said before, if this is your burning mission, go get it properly sorted out in a broader sense instead of irritating other contributors with such an poinhty, aggressive editing style. You should be proud of what shows up on your talk page instead of having to bury it all the time.  +++$+++ :As I said before, if this is your burning mission, go get it properly sorted out in a broader sense instead of irritating other contributors with such an poinhty, aggressive editing style. You should be proud of what shows up on your talk page instead of having to bury it all the time. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 16:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

263124 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263124 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-28 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.256738580E09 +++$+++ Hi Colin. I saw your comments at the FLC review for [[George Michael discography]]. Well I have nominated the above article at FLC as I believe a veteran artist like her should deserve a proper article on her albums. Would you please check the article and leave your concerns? :) <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ Hi Colin. I saw your comments at the FLC review for [[George Michael discography]]. Well I have nominated the above article at FLC as I believe a veteran artist like her should deserve a proper article on her albums. Would you please check the article and leave your concerns? :) <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 07:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
263125 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263124 +++$+++ 263124 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.256747880E09 +++$+++ Sure. I'll have a look later today.  +++$+++ :Sure. I'll have a look later today. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 09:38, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
263126 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263124 +++$+++ 263125 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.256817600E09 +++$+++ Well addressed your concern and removed the [[wp:overlink]]s from the article. <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ ::Well addressed your concern and removed the [[wp:overlink]]s from the article. <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 05:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

981 +++$+++ Oldelpaso +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 981 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-10 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.210435440E09 +++$+++ As much as I think the above bunch of warnings are [[WP:POINT|pointy]] indeed (a content dispute is certainly not vandalism), please stop edit warring over these logos. You are coming close to [[WP:3RR|3RR]] in some cases, which is of course a limit, not an entitlement.  +++$+++ As much as I think the above bunch of warnings are [[WP:POINT|pointy]] indeed (a content dispute is certainly not vandalism), please stop edit warring over these logos. You are coming close to [[WP:3RR|3RR]] in some cases, which is of course a limit, not an entitlement. [[User:Oldelpaso|Oldelpaso]] ([[User talk:Oldelpaso|talk]]) 09:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
982 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 981 +++$+++ 981 +++$+++ 2008-05-10 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.210483620E09 +++$+++ I'm not impressed with being wikilawyered by a narrow interpretation of policy. He's taken it on himself to define what is significant under nfc #8 despite the fact that that particular criteria is clearly marked as being under review and despite the fact that the use of logos is acceptable within defined guidelines. His repeatedly stated objective is to see an encyclopedia bereft of non-free content and he's refusing to listen to argument or even respect the existing rules and consensus.  +++$+++ :I'm not impressed with being wikilawyered by a narrow interpretation of policy. He's taken it on himself to define what is significant under nfc #8 despite the fact that that particular criteria is clearly marked as being under review and despite the fact that the use of logos is acceptable within defined guidelines. His repeatedly stated objective is to see an encyclopedia bereft of non-free content and he's refusing to listen to argument or even respect the existing rules and consensus. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 22:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
983 +++$+++ Oldelpaso +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 981 +++$+++ 982 +++$+++ 2008-05-11 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.210519260E09 +++$+++ An idea which would reinforce the fair use rationales: Generally, the football team articles which have become featured have a \"Colours and crest\" section, in which the evolution of a club's badge is discussed. Adding such a section to some of the relevant articles would provide the most rock-solid basis possible for including the logos.  +++$+++ ::An idea which would reinforce the fair use rationales: Generally, the football team articles which have become featured have a "Colours and crest" section, in which the evolution of a club's badge is discussed. Adding such a section to some of the relevant articles would provide the most rock-solid basis possible for including the logos. [[User:Oldelpaso|Oldelpaso]] ([[User talk:Oldelpaso|talk]]) 08:21, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
984 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 981 +++$+++ 983 +++$+++ 2008-05-11 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.210532760E09 +++$+++ But even then, there's a problem with this editor. The article on Dynamo Berlin explicity discusses the logo in some detail, its variants, the ownership issues attached to it in Germany, etc. and shows the various logo forms involved in that dispute. All that ignored and nuked by an overzealous editor, completely ignoring the context of the article, simply for the sake of policy warfare. That's not responsible editing, that's just hacking at the other guy and clearly reflects the unreasoning approach of this editor who likes to spout policy but is bent on ignoring policy, guidelines and concensus to serve his narrowly defined mission.  +++$+++ :::But even then, there's a problem with this editor. The article on Dynamo Berlin explicity discusses the logo in some detail, its variants, the ownership issues attached to it in Germany, etc. and shows the various logo forms involved in that dispute. All that ignored and nuked by an overzealous editor, completely ignoring the context of the article, simply for the sake of policy warfare. That's not responsible editing, that's just hacking at the other guy and clearly reflects the unreasoning approach of this editor who likes to spout policy but is bent on ignoring policy, guidelines and concensus to serve his narrowly defined mission. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 12:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

96052 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Pichpich +++$+++ 96052 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-06 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.202291700E09 +++$+++ I have copyedited the article according to each one of your suggestions; even scrapping about two dozen instances where there was a \"Villani\" and replacing it with a pronoun. I think you'll like the general clean up which follows the advice you've proposed here.--<strong> +++$+++ I have copyedited the article according to each one of your suggestions; even scrapping about two dozen instances where there was a "Villani" and replacing it with a pronoun. I think you'll like the general clean up which follows the advice you've proposed here.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 01:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
96053 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Pichpich +++$+++ 96052 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-06 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.202296080E09 +++$+++ Great! The League of Copyeditors will handle it from here; they're good at what they do, hence the name. Lol. ;)--<strong> +++$+++ ::Great! The League of Copyeditors will handle it from here; they're good at what they do, hence the name. Lol. ;)--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 03:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

263128 +++$+++ Mmagdalene722 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263128 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-02 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.257223560E09 +++$+++ Hello, Colin.  I saw that you had posted a peer-review request on the [[WP:MED| Medicine project]] message board, so I've gone in and made a few comments and minor changes.  I was wondering if I could ask you for a reciprocal favor:  I've recently expanded the [[SENSOR-Pesticides]] article and submitted it for peer review last week.  Would you be willing to take a look at it and offer your comments?  I'd like to eventually submit it for a Good Article nomination.  Thank you!   +++$+++ Hello, Colin.  I saw that you had posted a peer-review request on the [[WP:MED| Medicine project]] message board, so I've gone in and made a few comments and minor changes.  I was wondering if I could ask you for a reciprocal favor:  I've recently expanded the [[SENSOR-Pesticides]] article and submitted it for peer review last week.  Would you be willing to take a look at it and offer your comments?  I'd like to eventually submit it for a Good Article nomination.  Thank you!  [[User:Mmagdalene722|Mmagdalene722]] ([[User talk:Mmagdalene722|talk]]) 20:46, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
263129 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263128 +++$+++ 263128 +++$+++ 2009-11-02 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.257229620E09 +++$+++ Of course. But it is getting late here so perhaps tomorrow.  +++$+++ :Of course. But it is getting late here so perhaps tomorrow. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:27, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

985 +++$+++ Fasach Nua +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 985 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-11 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.210536300E09 +++$+++ I believe you are acting in good faith, however your edit waring must stop, I have nominated these decorative images for deletion at [[Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion]], please feel free to comment on them  +++$+++ I believe you are acting in good faith, however your edit waring must stop, I have nominated these decorative images for deletion at [[Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion]], please feel free to comment on them [[User:Fasach Nua|Fasach Nua]] ([[User talk:Fasach Nua|talk]]) 13:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
986 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 985 +++$+++ 985 +++$+++ 2008-05-11 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.210537740E09 +++$+++ Characterizing the editing warring as \"mine\"? C'mon. I'm hard talking, but I didn't start this. Take some ownership. And stop being so condesending to me and others in your remarks. I am appalled at the bullying approach being used and the unwavering narrow mindedness displayed. I understand this is a harsh statement, but I feel you're way out of line on this, failing both in the approach employed and in the interpretation of policy and guideline.  +++$+++ :Characterizing the editing warring as "mine"? C'mon. I'm hard talking, but I didn't start this. Take some ownership. And stop being so condesending to me and others in your remarks. I am appalled at the bullying approach being used and the unwavering narrow mindedness displayed. I understand this is a harsh statement, but I feel you're way out of line on this, failing both in the approach employed and in the interpretation of policy and guideline. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 13:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

263130 +++$+++ Mmagdalene722 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-05 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.257463200E09 +++$+++ Hello again, Colin.  I want to emphasize again how much I appreciate your help on this article!  I've taken Casliber's and your suggestions and expanded the [[SENSOR-Pesticides#Background|background]] section of the article, so if you could have a look at it and let me know what you think, that would be awesome.  Thanks again!  +++$+++ Hello again, Colin.  I want to emphasize again how much I appreciate your help on this article!  I've taken Casliber's and your suggestions and expanded the [[SENSOR-Pesticides#Background|background]] section of the article, so if you could have a look at it and let me know what you think, that would be awesome.  Thanks again! [[User:Mmagdalene722|<span style="font-family:French Script MT"><big>MMagdalene722</big></span>]][[User_talk:Mmagdalene722|<span style="font-family:French Script MT"><sup>talk to me</sup></span>]] 15:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
263131 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263130 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-05 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.257464760E09 +++$+++ Sure. Not sure if I'll have time tonight ([[Guy Fawkes Night]]).  +++$+++ ::Sure. Not sure if I'll have time tonight ([[Guy Fawkes Night]]). [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

987 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-10 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.210486860E09 +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, sorry to hear you got some trouble with a \"non-free-content-crusader\". Just to let you know, I came up with an idea on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject German football]] and would like to know what you think. Take care, stay calm,  +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, sorry to hear you got some trouble with a "non-free-content-crusader". Just to let you know, I came up with an idea on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject German football]] and would like to know what you think. Take care, stay calm, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 23:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
988 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 987 +++$+++ 987 +++$+++ 2008-05-11 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.210535640E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I just love zealots. But I hate bullies. Thanks for the advice. I'll wander over to the project and check out your notion. Looking forward to all the changes that'll be happening next season!  +++$+++ :Yeah, I just love zealots. But I hate bullies. Thanks for the advice. I'll wander over to the project and check out your notion. Looking forward to all the changes that'll be happening next season! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 12:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
989 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 987 +++$+++ 988 +++$+++ 2008-05-12 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.210581900E09 +++$+++ Lot's of end-of-season work coming up. The new 3rd Liga will make it even more, with the shift in the tiers below it! Well, hopefully you will have a nice, long list of club articles for you to create! I think, you won't get bored in a rush! Regarding the whole image thing, I think it will make people, including myself, very reluctant to upload anything. Pictures and images add a lot to wikipedia, it will be a shame. +++$+++ ::Lot's of end-of-season work coming up. The new 3rd Liga will make it even more, with the shift in the tiers below it! Well, hopefully you will have a nice, long list of club articles for you to create! I think, you won't get bored in a rush! Regarding the whole image thing, I think it will make people, including myself, very reluctant to upload anything. Pictures and images add a lot to wikipedia, it will be a shame.[[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 01:45, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
990 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 987 +++$+++ 989 +++$+++ 2008-05-12 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.210588140E09 +++$+++ Definitely looking forward to the new stuff. With respect to the images, don't be giving up. There's nothing wrong with the use of logos and it would be a shame to be put off of contributing by one bad editor. I've had my rant over on the football project discussion page and we'll see what comes of it. I'm not impressed with the whole thing, but I'm not prepared to be bullied either.  +++$+++ :::Definitely looking forward to the new stuff. With respect to the images, don't be giving up. There's nothing wrong with the use of logos and it would be a shame to be put off of contributing by one bad editor. I've had my rant over on the football project discussion page and we'll see what comes of it. I'm not impressed with the whole thing, but I'm not prepared to be bullied either. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 03:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

263134 +++$+++ Awadewit +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-13 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.258118220E09 +++$+++ When you nominate this for FAC, let me know. I'll want to support your fine work. :)  +++$+++ When you nominate this for FAC, let me know. I'll want to support your fine work. :) [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] ([[User talk:Awadewit|talk]]) 05:17, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
263135 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263134 +++$+++ 263134 +++$+++ 2009-11-21 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.258843320E09 +++$+++ Ditto. Did you get around to re-Wikifying the citations? I didn't comment further at the Peer review because I had no further concerns. I hope you didn't get the impression I'd forgotten!  +++$+++ :Ditto. Did you get around to re-Wikifying the citations? I didn't comment further at the Peer review because I had no further concerns. I hope you didn't get the impression I'd forgotten! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 14:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

991 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-13 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.210663560E09 +++$+++ I only just put [[VfB K\xf6nigsberg]] on the list and you have already created it, pretty quick! Regarding clubs like the ''VfB'' and [[Vorw\xe4rts-Rasensport Gleiwitz]], I think, there should be a sub-category for clubs from the former German terretories but I can't think of a title that's not to long, ''Catergory:Defunct football clubs from former German terretories'' seems a bit long. Any ideas? Secondly, when you create an article like ''VfB'' should we instantly remove it from the request page (I think not) or put the date of its creation and, maybe the creator (usually you) behind the name? I favor the later option. Anyway, the VfB K\xf6nigsberg article was long overdue, in hindsight, great to have it now!  +++$+++ I only just put [[VfB Königsberg]] on the list and you have already created it, pretty quick! Regarding clubs like the ''VfB'' and [[Vorwärts-Rasensport Gleiwitz]], I think, there should be a sub-category for clubs from the former German terretories but I can't think of a title that's not to long, ''Catergory:Defunct football clubs from former German terretories'' seems a bit long. Any ideas? Secondly, when you create an article like ''VfB'' should we instantly remove it from the request page (I think not) or put the date of its creation and, maybe the creator (usually you) behind the name? I favor the later option. Anyway, the VfB Königsberg article was long overdue, in hindsight, great to have it now! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
992 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 991 +++$+++ 991 +++$+++ 2008-05-13 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.210664700E09 +++$+++ I also think you're right on the process for removal. Gives folks a chance to see its been dealt with instead of just simply having disappeared. Keep well and see you around.  +++$+++ :I also think you're right on the process for removal. Gives folks a chance to see its been dealt with instead of just simply having disappeared. Keep well and see you around. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 00:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
993 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 991 +++$+++ 992 +++$+++ 2008-05-13 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.210669740E09 +++$+++ Well, the 1930's logos should have one advantage, I don't think they are copyrighted anymore. I'm going back to Germany for a few weeks in August, I got a fair bit of stuff on football there still, I can't wait to get hold of it, heaps of information in it. There is also a DSFS ''Gauliga'' brochure, I'm hoping to be able then, to create artricles for them too. So far, 1945 has been the cut-off point for information on German leagues, hope to push that back to at least 1933. Anyway, take care,  +++$+++ ::Well, the 1930's logos should have one advantage, I don't think they are copyrighted anymore. I'm going back to Germany for a few weeks in August, I got a fair bit of stuff on football there still, I can't wait to get hold of it, heaps of information in it. There is also a DSFS ''Gauliga'' brochure, I'm hoping to be able then, to create artricles for them too. So far, 1945 has been the cut-off point for information on German leagues, hope to push that back to at least 1933. Anyway, take care, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 02:09, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

437072 +++$+++  +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005 (UTC) +++$+++ 2005 (UTC)
437073 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437072 +++$+++ 437072 +++$+++ 2005-08-20 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.124539500E09 +++$+++ Actually I don't.  Those all pointed to a redirect. Whoever created [[crust (geology)]] or the redirect has that responsibility more so than I. Crust has many more meanings than just in geology, and someone must have agreed by creating crust (geology) to isolate the geological meaning. But I'll help out. -  +++$+++ :Actually I don't.  Those all pointed to a redirect. Whoever created [[crust (geology)]] or the redirect has that responsibility more so than I. Crust has many more meanings than just in geology, and someone must have agreed by creating crust (geology) to isolate the geological meaning. But I'll help out. - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 05:05, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
437074 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437072 +++$+++ 437073 +++$+++ 2005-08-20 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.124540460E09 +++$+++ I see that, thanks. More in the morning - tired now.  +++$+++ ::I see that, thanks. More in the morning - tired now. [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] 05:21, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

263138 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263138 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-16 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.261023360E09 +++$+++ Colin, much deserved, you put so much work into this. Graham.  +++$+++ Colin, much deserved, you put so much work into this. Graham. [[User:GrahamColm|Graham <font color="blue">Colm</font>]] [[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:16, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
263139 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263138 +++$+++ 263138 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.261459620E09 +++$+++ Hear, hear. Looking forward to the next one!  +++$+++ :Hear, hear. Looking forward to the next one! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 21:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

995 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-19 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.211200980E09 +++$+++ Good stuff, Wiggy, all this club articles. Reading them brings back a, saddly, almost forgotten part of Germany football history, even if not always a proud one. Anyway, keep them coming, I think they really add something to wikipedia, historically. Take care,  +++$+++ Good stuff, Wiggy, all this club articles. Reading them brings back a, saddly, almost forgotten part of Germany football history, even if not always a proud one. Anyway, keep them coming, I think they really add something to wikipedia, historically. Take care, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 05:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
996 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 995 +++$+++ 995 +++$+++ 2008-05-19 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.211257440E09 +++$+++ Thx. I find the whole thing quite interesting and there is always some poigniancy attached to writing about any kind of lost sports club. Yes, a rather sad bit of German and European history, but I agree - quite worth having as it does add some dimension. I see that [[User:Latouffedisco]] has also provided a list of lost or transformed clubs, in this case from France. And I found a record of a German club that actually survived the war's end to become a Polish or Russian side (can't remember which), so I'm looking forward to exploring that. Lots more fun stuff to puddle around in. Thanks again for the push.  +++$+++ :Thx. I find the whole thing quite interesting and there is always some poigniancy attached to writing about any kind of lost sports club. Yes, a rather sad bit of German and European history, but I agree - quite worth having as it does add some dimension. I see that [[User:Latouffedisco]] has also provided a list of lost or transformed clubs, in this case from France. And I found a record of a German club that actually survived the war's end to become a Polish or Russian side (can't remember which), so I'm looking forward to exploring that. Lots more fun stuff to puddle around in. Thanks again for the push. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 21:24, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
997 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 995 +++$+++ 996 +++$+++ 2008-05-20 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.211278320E09 +++$+++ I think, the database we are creating right now for the pre-1945 clubs and leagues is quite good. Its a time I didn't know all that much about beforehand. Lot's of exciting facts to learn! I think, the DYK talk page is an excellent way to put up interessting facts about articles regarding German football and I've made three sugestions so far, one of them in connection to [[Yorck Boyen Insterburg]] ([[Template talk:Did you know#Articles created\/expanded on May 18|see here]]) . I think, if we could get a fact from the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject German football]] on the main page once in a while, it would lift the profile of this Project considerably. Well, have fun and keep those club articles coming, I enjoy reading them!  +++$+++ ::I think, the database we are creating right now for the pre-1945 clubs and leagues is quite good. Its a time I didn't know all that much about beforehand. Lot's of exciting facts to learn! I think, the DYK talk page is an excellent way to put up interessting facts about articles regarding German football and I've made three sugestions so far, one of them in connection to [[Yorck Boyen Insterburg]] ([[Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on May 18|see here]]) . I think, if we could get a fact from the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject German football]] on the main page once in a while, it would lift the profile of this Project considerably. Well, have fun and keep those club articles coming, I enjoy reading them! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 03:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
998 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 995 +++$+++ 997 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.211353680E09 +++$+++ I'll have to try my hand at the DYK stuff. Good idea for building profile as you suggested.  +++$+++ :::I'll have to try my hand at the DYK stuff. Good idea for building profile as you suggested. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 00:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

263140 +++$+++ The Sceptical Chymist +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263140 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-24 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.261709520E09 +++$+++ Deconstruction is not a way collaborate productively. Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone. For example, I looked at [[ketogenic diet]] and in the very beginning of the article I see a contradiction. The text states \"Although popular for a while, it was abandoned by most academic centres in the '''1940s''' in favour of new anticonvulsant drugs.\" While the source states \"The ketogenic diet (KD), developed in the early 1920s, had fallen into disuse during the '''1970s and 1980s''' with the rapid development of new anticonvulsant agents for epilepsy\". There are probably dozens of OR-suspicious interpretations in any FA, if one wants to be paranoid. But let us use common sense.  +++$+++ Deconstruction is not a way collaborate productively. Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone. For example, I looked at [[ketogenic diet]] and in the very beginning of the article I see a contradiction. The text states "Although popular for a while, it was abandoned by most academic centres in the '''1940s''' in favour of new anticonvulsant drugs." While the source states "The ketogenic diet (KD), developed in the early 1920s, had fallen into disuse during the '''1970s and 1980s''' with the rapid development of new anticonvulsant agents for epilepsy". There are probably dozens of OR-suspicious interpretations in any FA, if one wants to be paranoid. But let us use common sense. [[User:The Sceptical Chymist|The Sceptical Chymist]] ([[User talk:The Sceptical Chymist|talk]]) 18:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
263141 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263140 +++$+++ 263140 +++$+++ 2009-12-24 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.261720440E09 +++$+++ It would help if you were less defensive. This isn't about me claiming to be better than thou (the \"without sin\" comment). For sure it is easier to find fault than to be perfect oneself. But these faults need to be found and dealt with before FA. I didn't look to see who wrote what when I made the comments, so don't [[WP:OWN]] the text and feel you personally have to defend and keep it. There are more important things to worry about than some bloody Boots patent that nobody in the sixty-year history of metformin and over five thousand medical journal articles has bothered to comment on before [and if they have, ''please'' let me know].  +++$+++ :It would help if you were less defensive. This isn't about me claiming to be better than thou (the "without sin" comment). For sure it is easier to find fault than to be perfect oneself. But these faults need to be found and dealt with before FA. I didn't look to see who wrote what when I made the comments, so don't [[WP:OWN]] the text and feel you personally have to defend and keep it. There are more important things to worry about than some bloody Boots patent that nobody in the sixty-year history of metformin and over five thousand medical journal articles has bothered to comment on before [and if they have, ''please'' let me know]. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:54, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
263142 +++$+++ The Sceptical Chymist +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263140 +++$+++ 263141 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.261856700E09 +++$+++ Can we agree not to refer to guidelines in our discussions? There is no need for that - we both know them well enough. Can we discuss things purely on merits? It would make editing so much smoother. For example, I can hardly agree with removal of the Boots patent based on the Wikilaw, but I see the merits of removing it based on readability and precedent.  +++$+++ :: Can we agree not to refer to guidelines in our discussions? There is no need for that - we both know them well enough. Can we discuss things purely on merits? It would make editing so much smoother. For example, I can hardly agree with removal of the Boots patent based on the Wikilaw, but I see the merits of removing it based on readability and precedent. [[User:The Sceptical Chymist|The Sceptical Chymist]] ([[User talk:The Sceptical Chymist|talk]]) 11:45, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
263143 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263140 +++$+++ 263142 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.261870620E09 +++$+++ If metformin doesn't obey our policy and guidelines, it will fail just as surely as if it were non-comprehensive or terrible prose. I don't think it would be helpful to restrain me from pointing out where I think the article fails in this regard. I won't edit war on the article text. You can choose to ignore my policy\/guidelines comments should you wish to avoid conflict, and leave it to Fvasconcellos or others to judge\/discuss. There are other aspects of content where I'm sure we can discuss more productively.  +++$+++ :::If metformin doesn't obey our policy and guidelines, it will fail just as surely as if it were non-comprehensive or terrible prose. I don't think it would be helpful to restrain me from pointing out where I think the article fails in this regard. I won't edit war on the article text. You can choose to ignore my policy/guidelines comments should you wish to avoid conflict, and leave it to Fvasconcellos or others to judge/discuss. There are other aspects of content where I'm sure we can discuss more productively. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:37, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
263144 +++$+++ The Sceptical Chymist +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263140 +++$+++ 263143 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.261872060E09 +++$+++ I did not say Metformin should not obey policies and regulations, what I said is ''it would be more productive to avoid citing them at each other''. My point is that discussions conducted in the plane of Wikilaw between us are never fruitful. Both of our views are based on policies, guidelines and precedents. We know them well, we can cite them in support of our views. But what we usually argue about is in gray areas of Wikilaw. That is why I suggest to base discussions between us on the universal law of reason. +++$+++ :::: I did not say Metformin should not obey policies and regulations, what I said is ''it would be more productive to avoid citing them at each other''. My point is that discussions conducted in the plane of Wikilaw between us are never fruitful. Both of our views are based on policies, guidelines and precedents. We know them well, we can cite them in support of our views. But what we usually argue about is in gray areas of Wikilaw. That is why I suggest to base discussions between us on the universal law of reason.[[User:The Sceptical Chymist|The Sceptical Chymist]] ([[User talk:The Sceptical Chymist|talk]]) 16:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
263145 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263140 +++$+++ 263144 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.261881900E09 +++$+++ If the law of reason was universal, we wouldn't need policies whose sole purpose is to take away the job of reasoning\/analysing\/interpreting\/weighing\/judging\/etc and make them the job of our sources. By refusing to follow WP rules on this matter, you are actually taking away some of the mechanisms that stop Wikipedians arguing. Like judging the weight of an issue: if our sources give it no weight, then neither should we, job done and no need for further disagreement. We wouldn't need to argue whether an event was the first or marked a turning point or whatever, if our sources said so explicitly. I'd rather your response was \"Well, so and so in such and such said this or that\" than \"I've counted the database search results prior and post this event and conclude ...\". I'd prefer if our disagreement on WP policy interpretation was in obscure grey areas. It isn't.  +++$+++ ::::: If the law of reason was universal, we wouldn't need policies whose sole purpose is to take away the job of reasoning/analysing/interpreting/weighing/judging/etc and make them the job of our sources. By refusing to follow WP rules on this matter, you are actually taking away some of the mechanisms that stop Wikipedians arguing. Like judging the weight of an issue: if our sources give it no weight, then neither should we, job done and no need for further disagreement. We wouldn't need to argue whether an event was the first or marked a turning point or whatever, if our sources said so explicitly. I'd rather your response was "Well, so and so in such and such said this or that" than "I've counted the database search results prior and post this event and conclude ...". I'd prefer if our disagreement on WP policy interpretation was in obscure grey areas. It isn't. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:45, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

524454 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-02 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.191365220E09 +++$+++ How ''precisely'' do you know that they are notable if you can't read them, and don't know what they are about? Anyway, take to DRV if you want, there's nothing stopping you. -  +++$+++ How ''precisely'' do you know that they are notable if you can't read them, and don't know what they are about? Anyway, take to DRV if you want, there's nothing stopping you. - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 15:47, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
524455 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524454 +++$+++ 524454 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191365460E09 +++$+++ I don't know, from external evidence (it's a large site, somewhat ad-laden, but clearly not a porn site, apparently focused on economic issues in general) it seemed like it could be a reliable source, but I will defer either way to someone who does read Italian or otherwise claims they know better. That's what I wrote in the AFD, and that's why I'm not taking it to DRV, or even objecting to the close as such. I was commenting on Epbr123's comment, and wondering if you do claim you (yu) do know better, mainly out of curiousity, and for the next time Economia Aziende writes an article on something. So, do you read Italian or otherwise have any reason to know whether or not they're just a random site, or something more notable or reliable? -- +++$+++ : I don't know, from external evidence (it's a large site, somewhat ad-laden, but clearly not a porn site, apparently focused on economic issues in general) it seemed like it could be a reliable source, but I will defer either way to someone who does read Italian or otherwise claims they know better. That's what I wrote in the AFD, and that's why I'm not taking it to DRV, or even objecting to the close as such. I was commenting on Epbr123's comment, and wondering if you do claim you (yu) do know better, mainly out of curiousity, and for the next time Economia Aziende writes an article on something. So, do you read Italian or otherwise have any reason to know whether or not they're just a random site, or something more notable or reliable? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

999 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-21 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.211356140E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ Thanks! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
1000 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.211369700E09 +++$+++ Regarding the article you createt about the club now, it appears, the club is still active. It may have to be moved to its French name, if we are shure it is the same club, which seems likely. I added what I could find about it from a link [[User:Latouffedisco]] left me. I'm not quite certain what league level the club is on now, it appears, the ''Promotion A'' is the third level of the ''Ligue d' Alsace'' but I don't know where this league rates in the French league system. I don't speak French at all, that makes things a bit tricky. Anyway, I added what I could but that leaves us with the dilema of the club still being \"alive\". Greetings,  +++$+++ :Regarding the article you createt about the club now, it appears, the club is still active. It may have to be moved to its French name, if we are shure it is the same club, which seems likely. I added what I could find about it from a link [[User:Latouffedisco]] left me. I'm not quite certain what league level the club is on now, it appears, the ''Promotion A'' is the third level of the ''Ligue d' Alsace'' but I don't know where this league rates in the French league system. I don't speak French at all, that makes things a bit tricky. Anyway, I added what I could but that leaves us with the dilema of the club still being "alive". Greetings, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 04:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
1001 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.211393280E09 +++$+++ I ws wondering about that. I found a few hints but nothing specific, and what I have come across so far is more about handball than football. We'll see.  +++$+++ :I ws wondering about that. I found a few hints but nothing specific, and what I have come across so far is more about handball than football. We'll see. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 11:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
1002 +++$+++ Latouffedisco +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ 1001 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.211424240E09 +++$+++ Hi guys and sorry to interrupt you and thanks Wiggy for creating this article. As far as I know, SC Selestat is an omnisport club (the handball section plays in first division, which is good for a small town like S\xe9l\xe9stat). The football section is still active. The link you put on the article suggests it [http:\/\/www.fff.fr\/competitions\/php\/club\/club_fiche.php?cl_no=255] as FFF only lists active clubs. Moreover, this link [http:\/\/www.lalsace.fr\/articles\/show\/id\/245116?symfony=8ee34d3b106e42923c89c4f8871c4a39] which is a very recent article about the team indicates that S\xe9l\xe9stat is close to relegation. That's right they play in Promotion A, Group D, of the Ligue d' Alsace - Bas Rhin which is the ninth level of French football: Ligue 1, ligue 2, national, CFA, CFA2, DH, excellence A, promotion excellence A, promotion A. No, that is not complicated! And as the club is still active, maybe you should move the article to the club current name, no? Regards.-- +++$+++ ::Hi guys and sorry to interrupt you and thanks Wiggy for creating this article. As far as I know, SC Selestat is an omnisport club (the handball section plays in first division, which is good for a small town like Séléstat). The football section is still active. The link you put on the article suggests it [http://www.fff.fr/competitions/php/club/club_fiche.php?cl_no=255] as FFF only lists active clubs. Moreover, this link [http://www.lalsace.fr/articles/show/id/245116?symfony=8ee34d3b106e42923c89c4f8871c4a39] which is a very recent article about the team indicates that Séléstat is close to relegation. That's right they play in Promotion A, Group D, of the Ligue d' Alsace - Bas Rhin which is the ninth level of French football: Ligue 1, ligue 2, national, CFA, CFA2, DH, excellence A, promotion excellence A, promotion A. No, that is not complicated! And as the club is still active, maybe you should move the article to the club current name, no? Regards.--[[User:Latouffedisco|Latouffedisco]] ([[User talk:Latouffedisco|talk]]) 19:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
1003 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ 1002 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.211425740E09 +++$+++ I've not been able to find out much about the club post-war (except for its noteable role as a handball club) so there is a big gap ost 1945. I probably will move it over to SC S\xe9lestat with a redirect from SV 06 Schlettstadt in a bit, along the lines of the Strassburg\/Strasbourg clubs. Thanks for the note!  +++$+++ :::I've not been able to find out much about the club post-war (except for its noteable role as a handball club) so there is a big gap ost 1945. I probably will move it over to SC Sélestat with a redirect from SV 06 Schlettstadt in a bit, along the lines of the Strassburg/Strasbourg clubs. Thanks for the note! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 20:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
1004 +++$+++ Latouffedisco +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ 1003 +++$+++ 2008-05-22 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.211486220E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! It's true that informations for amateur clubs are very hard to find in France, we have to deal with that!-- +++$+++ ::::You're welcome! It's true that informations for amateur clubs are very hard to find in France, we have to deal with that!--[[User:Latouffedisco|Latouffedisco]] ([[User talk:Latouffedisco|talk]]) 12:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
1005 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ 1004 +++$+++ 2008-05-22 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.211498640E09 +++$+++ Well, you guys did a good job rooting stuff out. I pretty much struck out. I've run into the same problem from time to time trying to pin down lower level German clubs, which can be kind of frustrating if they're traditional sides with some interesting history. Thx again. Keep well and happy editing.  +++$+++ :::::Well, you guys did a good job rooting stuff out. I pretty much struck out. I've run into the same problem from time to time trying to pin down lower level German clubs, which can be kind of frustrating if they're traditional sides with some interesting history. Thx again. Keep well and happy editing. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 16:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

525289 +++$+++ Secret Squïrrel +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.176904200E09 +++$+++ I fixed the odd \"x = y + z\" bit in the above article. Now reads: ''The term \"professional phagocytes\" is sometimes used to describe [[macrophages]] and [[neutrophil]]s, because these cells are considered to have phagocytosis as their primary function.<ref>{{GeorgiaImmunology|1\/phagocyt}}<\/ref>''. I assume you intended it as a temporary marker or something and it got lost amongst all your other concerns. You're busy. It happens!  +++$+++ I fixed the odd "x = y + z" bit in the above article. Now reads: ''The term "professional phagocytes" is sometimes used to describe [[macrophages]] and [[neutrophil]]s, because these cells are considered to have phagocytosis as their primary function.<ref>{{GeorgiaImmunology|1/phagocyt}}</ref>''. I assume you intended it as a temporary marker or something and it got lost amongst all your other concerns. You're busy. It happens! [[User:Secret Squïrrel|Secret Squïrrel]] 06:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
525290 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525289 +++$+++ 525289 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.176928140E09 +++$+++ You are correct - sometimes when I'm trying to outline a page, I use [[Pseudocode]] in my drafts as I try to figure out the structure. Usually I replace it before saving, but in this case I neglected to do so. Thank you for fixing it. -- +++$+++ :You are correct - sometimes when I'm trying to outline a page, I use [[Pseudocode]] in my drafts as I try to figure out the structure. Usually I replace it before saving, but in this case I neglected to do so. Thank you for fixing it. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 13:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

263148 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263148 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-15 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.263553140E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article\/January 17, 2010|Have fun :)]] I'll help.  Happy New Year! Best,  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 17, 2010|Have fun :)]] I'll help.  Happy New Year! Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:59, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
263149 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263148 +++$+++ 263148 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 09:16:00 +++$+++ 1.263575760E09 +++$+++ Oh wow. That was quick. That's made my day. OK, the blurb looks good but the only problem is the second last sentence gives the impression the diet is no longer used. I see the text is 1447 characters, which is longer than the 1200 benchmark so I guess we can't add more. Perhaps the whole \"Developed in the 1920s, the ketogenic diet was widely used into the next decade, but its popularity waned with the introduction of effective anticonvulsant drugs.\" sentence could be dropped and the \"Developed in the 1920s, \" bit stuck on the front of \"The classic ketogenic diet contains\"?  Perhaps we could also replace one of the \"The diet\"s with \"This [[medical nutrition therapy]]\" to emphasise this is a serious therapy under medical supervision, not some fad diet. Thoughts? Am I able\/allowed to edit the blurb or do I request changes somewhere?  +++$+++ :Oh wow. That was quick. That's made my day. OK, the blurb looks good but the only problem is the second last sentence gives the impression the diet is no longer used. I see the text is 1447 characters, which is longer than the 1200 benchmark so I guess we can't add more. Perhaps the whole "Developed in the 1920s, the ketogenic diet was widely used into the next decade, but its popularity waned with the introduction of effective anticonvulsant drugs." sentence could be dropped and the "Developed in the 1920s, " bit stuck on the front of "The classic ketogenic diet contains"?  Perhaps we could also replace one of the "The diet"s with "This [[medical nutrition therapy]]" to emphasise this is a serious therapy under medical supervision, not some fad diet. Thoughts? Am I able/allowed to edit the blurb or do I request changes somewhere? [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 09:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
263150 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263148 +++$+++ 263149 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.263593820E09 +++$+++ Raul doesn't usually object to changes, but I'm not sure if the page is protected yet?  You might make your changes, and then drop a note on his talk page, with a diff and explanation of the changes. If it's already protected, you'll have to suggest the changes on the talk page of the blurb, and find an admin to do it.  +++$+++ :: Raul doesn't usually object to changes, but I'm not sure if the page is protected yet?  You might make your changes, and then drop a note on his talk page, with a diff and explanation of the changes. If it's already protected, you'll have to suggest the changes on the talk page of the blurb, and find an admin to do it. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 14:17, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
263151 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263148 +++$+++ 263150 +++$+++ 2010-01-16 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.263670920E09 +++$+++ Looks like I missed the boat for making the change myself. I've made a suggestion on the talk page.  +++$+++ :::Looks like I missed the boat for making the change myself. I've made a suggestion on the talk page. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
263152 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263148 +++$+++ 263151 +++$+++ 2010-01-16 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.263673800E09 +++$+++ I have implemented the changes, could you tell Raul?  +++$+++ ::::I have implemented the changes, could you tell Raul? [[User:GrahamColm|Graham <font color="blue">Colm</font>]] [[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

525293 +++$+++ JenniferFisher +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-19 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.177019340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:JenniferFisher|JenniferFisher]] 14:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
525294 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525293 +++$+++ 525293 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.177020060E09 +++$+++ A good overview of the standards for inclusion is available at [[Wikipedia:External_links]]. If you read that page and still really feel that your link belongs on the [[Hormone]] page, then your best strategy is probably to ask at [[Talk:Hormone]] and see if there are any objections. -- +++$+++ :A good overview of the standards for inclusion is available at [[Wikipedia:External_links]]. If you read that page and still really feel that your link belongs on the [[Hormone]] page, then your best strategy is probably to ask at [[Talk:Hormone]] and see if there are any objections. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 15:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

1006 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1006 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-23 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.211570280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the revert in the Oberliga article. I just didn't have the nerve yesterday.  +++$+++ Thanks for the revert in the Oberliga article. I just didn't have the nerve yesterday. [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 12:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
1007 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1006 +++$+++ 1006 +++$+++ 2008-05-23 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.211578980E09 +++$+++ Well, I wasn't entirely sure it was the right thing to do, but the German plurals wouldn't necessarily be clear to an English speaker with out somesort of explanation somewhere. That and the opening line about the DDR-Oberliga was already covered in the body of the text, so I just wikilinked it. I hope it all helps to keep the thing readable. Keep well. Be nervy!  +++$+++ :Well, I wasn't entirely sure it was the right thing to do, but the German plurals wouldn't necessarily be clear to an English speaker with out somesort of explanation somewhere. That and the opening line about the DDR-Oberliga was already covered in the body of the text, so I just wikilinked it. I hope it all helps to keep the thing readable. Keep well. Be nervy! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 14:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
1008 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1006 +++$+++ 1007 +++$+++ 2008-05-24 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.211616960E09 +++$+++ Being a native speaker of German, I can tell you it was exactly the right thing to do - for exactly the reason you mentioned. And I usually am nervy. But not at 11 pm. ;)  +++$+++ ::Being a native speaker of German, I can tell you it was exactly the right thing to do - for exactly the reason you mentioned. And I usually am nervy. But not at 11 pm. ;) [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 01:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
1009 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1006 +++$+++ 1008 +++$+++ 2008-05-24 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.211693280E09 +++$+++ Hy Wiggy, I just had [[User:NiTeChiLLeR]] lecturing me on the fact that it is ''Ligen'', not ''Ligas'', propably a naitive German speaker, too. Is there any standard on what to use? I usually go with ''Ligas'' nowadays, for the reason mentioned by you above.  +++$+++ :::Hy Wiggy, I just had [[User:NiTeChiLLeR]] lecturing me on the fact that it is ''Ligen'', not ''Ligas'', propably a naitive German speaker, too. Is there any standard on what to use? I usually go with ''Ligas'' nowadays, for the reason mentioned by you above. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 22:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
1010 +++$+++ -Lemmy- +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1006 +++$+++ 1009 +++$+++ 2008-05-25 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.211738160E09 +++$+++ Whenever I see '''xyz-ligas''' I turn it into '''xyz-ligen''' as well. When we write in German we should stay be right or translate in English. But how? Oberliga = major league?, upper league? Oberligen and Regionalligen wouldn't do harm when we link Oberligen to Oberliga.  +++$+++ ::::Whenever I see '''xyz-ligas''' I turn it into '''xyz-ligen''' as well. When we write in German we should stay be right or translate in English. But how? Oberliga = major league?, upper league? Oberligen and Regionalligen wouldn't do harm when we link Oberligen to Oberliga. [[User:-Lemmy-|-Lemmy-]] ([[User talk:-Lemmy-|talk]]) 10:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
1011 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1006 +++$+++ 1010 +++$+++ 2008-05-25 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.211756940E09 +++$+++ I suppose I should break down and do what I should have done from the word go - go look for some direction in the Manual of Style. I've always been a bit unsure at the approach to use, leaning towards Oberligas instead of Oberligen. I'm pretty sure in a couple of place I wrote something like Oberliga (plural: Oberligen) in a couple of articles so I was free to use the German plural without any confusion in the rest of the article. I'll go have a look at the MoS and maybe see what practise is used by some other leagues. Sorry if I've caused an unnecessary stir.  +++$+++ :::::I suppose I should break down and do what I should have done from the word go - go look for some direction in the Manual of Style. I've always been a bit unsure at the approach to use, leaning towards Oberligas instead of Oberligen. I'm pretty sure in a couple of place I wrote something like Oberliga (plural: Oberligen) in a couple of articles so I was free to use the German plural without any confusion in the rest of the article. I'll go have a look at the MoS and maybe see what practise is used by some other leagues. Sorry if I've caused an unnecessary stir. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 16:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
1012 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1006 +++$+++ 1011 +++$+++ 2008-05-25 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.211758800E09 +++$+++ Okay, here is the relevant reference as near as I can figure. Its at the bottom of the section, just below note 6. With apologies for looking like a rule banger ... it's just the way I'm familiar with writing this sort of thing. [[English_plurals#Irregular_plurals_from_other_languages]]  +++$+++ ::::::Okay, here is the relevant reference as near as I can figure. Its at the bottom of the section, just below note 6. With apologies for looking like a rule banger ... it's just the way I'm familiar with writing this sort of thing. [[English_plurals#Irregular_plurals_from_other_languages]] [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 16:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

525296 +++$+++ NCurse +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525296 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-23 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.177334340E09 +++$+++ Hey, Arcadian! It'd be great! Boxes that need a continuous update: News, Selected image, Selected article, quotes, to-dos and projects. What are you interested in? And do you need any kind of help? Thanks in advance.  +++$+++ Hey, Arcadian! It'd be great! Boxes that need a continuous update: News, Selected image, Selected article, quotes, to-dos and projects. What are you interested in? And do you need any kind of help? Thanks in advance. [[User:NCurse|NCurse]] <sub> [[User talk:NCurse|work]]</sub> 06:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
525297 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525296 +++$+++ 525296 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.177407540E09 +++$+++ I'm still learning the format, but I just made my first edit, at [[Portal:Medicine\/Things you can do]].   -- +++$+++ :I'm still learning the format, but I just made my first edit, at [[Portal:Medicine/Things you can do]].   --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 02:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
525298 +++$+++ NCurse +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525296 +++$+++ 525297 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.177454340E09 +++$+++ Cool, that box hasn't been updated for a while now... Do you want to create a Selected Image template? I can list you the parts of the procedure. PS: you can reply here, I'm watching you. :)  +++$+++ ::Cool, that box hasn't been updated for a while now... Do you want to create a Selected Image template? I can list you the parts of the procedure. PS: you can reply here, I'm watching you. :) [[User:NCurse|NCurse]] <sub> [[User talk:NCurse|work]]</sub> 15:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
525299 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525296 +++$+++ 525298 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.177741560E09 +++$+++ Hmm, I'm not sure what you mean by \"Selected Image template\", but if you list the steps, or provide an example, I'd be happy to help out. -- +++$+++ :::Hmm, I'm not sure what you mean by "Selected Image template", but if you list the steps, or provide an example, I'd be happy to help out. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

263153 +++$+++ Rafablu88 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263153 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-17 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.263722760E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For an absolutely brilliant article on the [[ketogenic diet]]. Great stuff. <font color=\"red\">'''RB88'''<\/font><small>&nbsp;( +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For an absolutely brilliant article on the [[ketogenic diet]]. Great stuff. <font color="red">'''RB88'''</font><small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Rafablu88|'''T''']])</small> 02:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
263154 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263153 +++$+++ 263153 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.263741300E09 +++$+++ I stayed up 'til 2 am ... all has been quiet for several hours, so I'm getting some beauty sleep now :)   +++$+++ : I stayed up 'til 2 am ... all has been quiet for several hours, so I'm getting some beauty sleep now :)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 07:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
263155 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263153 +++$+++ 263154 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.263807180E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on an inordinately calm TFA, Colin. What's next on your list? :)  +++$+++ ::Congratulations on an inordinately calm TFA, Colin. What's next on your list? :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 01:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
263156 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263153 +++$+++ 263155 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.263835320E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much to all those who stayed up or otherwise helped monitor the page. Despite my fears it only got about 60 edits. Which is just as well as I was very busy IRL yesterday. The minor vandalism or incorrect edits were dealt with very swiftly -- so much so that every time I refreshed my watchlist, someone had beaten me to it. I didn't actually edit the article at all. I see that one person missed the opportunity to comment on the article during FAC, and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ketogenic_diet&diff=338448933&oldid=338439076 made their opinions known]! We even had a few helpful IP edits. The [http:\/\/stats.grok.se\/en\/201001\/ketogenic%20diet viewing stats for yesterday] were 37,000 hits, which is not at all bad for an obscure medical subject, and 4.6M hits for the main page. A lot of people saw my wife's hand and my kitchen tiling!  +++$+++ :::Thank you very much to all those who stayed up or otherwise helped monitor the page. Despite my fears it only got about 60 edits. Which is just as well as I was very busy IRL yesterday. The minor vandalism or incorrect edits were dealt with very swiftly -- so much so that every time I refreshed my watchlist, someone had beaten me to it. I didn't actually edit the article at all. I see that one person missed the opportunity to comment on the article during FAC, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ketogenic_diet&diff=338448933&oldid=338439076 made their opinions known]! We even had a few helpful IP edits. The [http://stats.grok.se/en/201001/ketogenic%20diet viewing stats for yesterday] were 37,000 hits, which is not at all bad for an obscure medical subject, and 4.6M hits for the main page. A lot of people saw my wife's hand and my kitchen tiling! [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 09:22, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
263157 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263153 +++$+++ 263155 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.263837720E09 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos, my next personal project will be [[tuberous sclerosis]], though I'll be sure to help you and others out on your projects too, as I find the time.  +++$+++ :::Fvasconcellos, my next personal project will be [[tuberous sclerosis]], though I'll be sure to help you and others out on your projects too, as I find the time. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 10:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

568147 +++$+++ NickelShoe +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-25 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.140901260E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Best Friends... Different Personalities]]  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Friends... Different Personalities]] [[User:NickelShoe|NickelShoe]] 13:01, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
568148 +++$+++ NickelShoe +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568147 +++$+++ 568147 +++$+++ 2006-02-25 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.140920880E09 +++$+++ I like prodding for that purpose too, but the person removed the tag without really improving the article and someone stuck it back on.  So it was either AfD or deprod again, and with a 2008 TV show, I thought AfD was proper.  +++$+++ :I like prodding for that purpose too, but the person removed the tag without really improving the article and someone stuck it back on.  So it was either AfD or deprod again, and with a 2008 TV show, I thought AfD was proper. [[User:NickelShoe|NickelShoe]] 18:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

1013 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-25 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.211783220E09 +++$+++ It seems, for once, there isn't a rule on wikipedia for something! From a German point of view, ''Ligas'' sounds a bit wrong, but as we are on the English wikipedia, I guess we should stick with what it recommends rather then our personal feelings. Regarding what Lemmy says, I think, names of leagues should not be translated, ''Oberliga'' is fine to use in my opinion. You certainly get no useful hits when googling ''Upper League Bavaria''!  +++$+++ It seems, for once, there isn't a rule on wikipedia for something! From a German point of view, ''Ligas'' sounds a bit wrong, but as we are on the English wikipedia, I guess we should stick with what it recommends rather then our personal feelings. Regarding what Lemmy says, I think, names of leagues should not be translated, ''Oberliga'' is fine to use in my opinion. You certainly get no useful hits when googling ''Upper League Bavaria''! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 23:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
1014 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1013 +++$+++ 1013 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.211817840E09 +++$+++ Also, even if you are a native speaker of German - this is not a German-language project. Hence I would use plural markers that are used by the English language, in this case, adding the suffix -s to the original noun. Anything else only leads to confusion, IMHO.  +++$+++ :Also, even if you are a native speaker of German - this is not a German-language project. Hence I would use plural markers that are used by the English language, in this case, adding the suffix -s to the original noun. Anything else only leads to confusion, IMHO. [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 09:04, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1015 +++$+++ NiTeChiLLeR +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1013 +++$+++ 1014 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.211835480E09 +++$+++ in my opinion it doesn't matter if en.wikipedia is an english project or not - the problem is that there is no standard for plural-forms in english. an example is the german [[Fachhochschule]]: as you can see the plural-form is Fachhochschule''n'' (with an 'n') ALSO on en.wikipedia! NOBODY will use the word Fachhochschule''s'' - not in germany and not at any partner-universities in kanada, usa, france, vietnam or china! the reason is the international spelling of some german, french, spanish.. words, which cannot be transfered to english-grammar - but there is the same problem with english words in the german language (called [[anglicism]] ;-), where is '''no general standard'''. so, in my opinion also the english project of wikipedia should keep in mind that on the one hand there is the english-grammar-problem, on the other hand we should keep many international forms of other languages.. (would be very embarrassing speaking german words with english grammar to german people :-)) in fact: use lig''en'' and not liga''s''. -- +++$+++ ::in my opinion it doesn't matter if en.wikipedia is an english project or not - the problem is that there is no standard for plural-forms in english. an example is the german [[Fachhochschule]]: as you can see the plural-form is Fachhochschule''n'' (with an 'n') ALSO on en.wikipedia! NOBODY will use the word Fachhochschule''s'' - not in germany and not at any partner-universities in kanada, usa, france, vietnam or china! the reason is the international spelling of some german, french, spanish.. words, which cannot be transfered to english-grammar - but there is the same problem with english words in the german language (called [[anglicism]] ;-), where is '''no general standard'''. so, in my opinion also the english project of wikipedia should keep in mind that on the one hand there is the english-grammar-problem, on the other hand we should keep many international forms of other languages.. (would be very embarrassing speaking german words with english grammar to german people :-)) in fact: use lig''en'' and not liga''s''. --[[User:NiTeChiLLeR|NiTeChiLLeR]] ([[User talk:NiTeChiLLeR|talk]]) 13:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1016 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1013 +++$+++ 1015 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.211865720E09 +++$+++ There actually is a rule as I pointed out in the link above which is \"Nouns from languages other than the above generally form plurals as if they were native English words\". That said, rather than have a -s camp and an -en camp and an unnecessary dispute of the trivial sort, maybe we could adopt the Oberliga (plural: Oberligen), Regionalliga (plural: Regionalligen), Verbandsliga (plural: Verbandsligen) approach? The problem seems to only really crop up in the articles written about the ligas\/ligen themselves and if its explained away early in the context of the article that should let us teach English speakers a thing or two, while keeping good form in German. It should be possible to write around the problem in nay other article that it might raise its <ugly> head just by re-working a sentence or two. Does that sound like a fair approach to keep both the -s and the -en advocates happy? Peace and serenity in the pursuit of knowledge and all that. :)  +++$+++ :::There actually is a rule as I pointed out in the link above which is "Nouns from languages other than the above generally form plurals as if they were native English words". That said, rather than have a -s camp and an -en camp and an unnecessary dispute of the trivial sort, maybe we could adopt the Oberliga (plural: Oberligen), Regionalliga (plural: Regionalligen), Verbandsliga (plural: Verbandsligen) approach? The problem seems to only really crop up in the articles written about the ligas/ligen themselves and if its explained away early in the context of the article that should let us teach English speakers a thing or two, while keeping good form in German. It should be possible to write around the problem in nay other article that it might raise its <ugly> head just by re-working a sentence or two. Does that sound like a fair approach to keep both the -s and the -en advocates happy? Peace and serenity in the pursuit of knowledge and all that. :) [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 22:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1017 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1013 +++$+++ 1013 +++$+++ 2008-05-27 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.211872380E09 +++$+++ Keep in mind, that the word ''Liga'' is not exclusevly owned by the German language but in fact used in many, mostly Eastern European countrys (see [[Liga]]). I think, Wiggys idea of an early explanation in the article seems fine. Where this is missing however, we should stick with ''Ligas''.  +++$+++ :Keep in mind, that the word ''Liga'' is not exclusevly owned by the German language but in fact used in many, mostly Eastern European countrys (see [[Liga]]). I think, Wiggys idea of an early explanation in the article seems fine. Where this is missing however, we should stick with ''Ligas''. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
1018 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1013 +++$+++ 1013 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.211790960E09 +++$+++ You're right! Thanks. I'll fix it right away. Good eye.  +++$+++ :You're right! Thanks. I'll fix it right away. Good eye. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 01:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1019 +++$+++ Sebastian scha. +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1013 +++$+++ 1018 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.211791440E09 +++$+++ No problem, I'd like to help. More important: now I have a sports link, when\/if I start the quarter pages. ;-)  +++$+++ ::No problem, I'd like to help. More important: now I have a sports link, when/if I start the quarter pages. ;-) [[User:Sebastian scha.|Sebastian scha.]] ([[User talk:Sebastian scha.|talk]]) 01:44, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

263161 +++$+++ 2over0 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-22 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.266888840E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your kind words of encouragement to the above user. On a related note, I remember seeing you around as a voice of reason and vaguely thought that you had the mop'n'bucket already. I have not checked your contributions in detail yet, but would standing at [[WP:RFA]] be something that would interest you? Regards, -  +++$+++ Thank you for your kind words of encouragement to the above user. On a related note, I remember seeing you around as a voice of reason and vaguely thought that you had the mop'n'bucket already. I have not checked your contributions in detail yet, but would standing at [[WP:RFA]] be something that would interest you? Regards, - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 17:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
263162 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263161 +++$+++ 263161 +++$+++ 2010-02-22 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.266900240E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'm not really interested in the mop'n'bucket, sorry. When I do find quality time for Wikipedia, I prefer to spend it writing or reviewing. At the moment, I'm not even finding time for that. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks. I'm not really interested in the mop'n'bucket, sorry. When I do find quality time for Wikipedia, I prefer to spend it writing or reviewing. At the moment, I'm not even finding time for that. Cheers, [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

263163 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-10 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.268289840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for sorting out those URLs. I wasn't aware that the QJM article could be reached freely. I'm a bit surprised at the lack of response to the peer review request. Would you able to read the article more closely and offer your usually sage advice?  +++$+++ Thanks for sorting out those URLs. I wasn't aware that the QJM article could be reached freely. I'm a bit surprised at the lack of response to the peer review request. Would you able to read the article more closely and offer your usually sage advice? [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 22:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
263164 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263163 +++$+++ 263163 +++$+++ 2010-03-11 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.268325120E09 +++$+++ Yes. I read through the Cash paper last night and the lead of the WP article. I've already made a few notes on my PC but didn't get very far before I ran out of time. I do intend to continue with it, though I may only manage a little bit at a time. Reviewers might be getting put off by the complex article title. Not much we can do about it, though you might try adding a lay-friendly sentence to the peer-review-request saying what the subject is and perhaps what aspects of review you feel it needs (some folk might think you just want it reviewed for medical accuracy and feel underqualified). The \"...I thought some feedback would be useful\" might be a little too passive for to stir our American friends into action :-)  +++$+++ :Yes. I read through the Cash paper last night and the lead of the WP article. I've already made a few notes on my PC but didn't get very far before I ran out of time. I do intend to continue with it, though I may only manage a little bit at a time. Reviewers might be getting put off by the complex article title. Not much we can do about it, though you might try adding a lay-friendly sentence to the peer-review-request saying what the subject is and perhaps what aspects of review you feel it needs (some folk might think you just want it reviewed for medical accuracy and feel underqualified). The "...I thought some feedback would be useful" might be a little too passive for to stir our American friends into action :-) [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 08:32, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

1020 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1020 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-28 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.211968140E09 +++$+++ Hy Wiggy, I just added three more clubs to the ''Articles on historic football clubs'' list. Currently, all three pages are redirects only, created by me today because the clubs they redirect to have some historical information on the original, pre-1945, versions. I'm just wondering what you think. Should these three clubs have their own article or do you consider the current arangement sufficient? Have fun,  +++$+++ Hy Wiggy, I just added three more clubs to the ''Articles on historic football clubs'' list. Currently, all three pages are redirects only, created by me today because the clubs they redirect to have some historical information on the original, pre-1945, versions. I'm just wondering what you think. Should these three clubs have their own article or do you consider the current arangement sufficient? Have fun, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 02:49, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
1021 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1020 +++$+++ 1020 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 10:28:00 +++$+++ 1.211995680E09 +++$+++ I don't have my Vereinslexikon handy, so I can't say how much info there is available on the club. I'll have to check in a day or so. I ran into a similar thing at [[HSV Barmbek-Uhlenhorst]] just the other day. Both that club and [[KSG Alsterdorf]] have their own Vereinslexikon entries as first division sides historically. Alsterdorf was a wartime side made up of several other clubs (including BU) and really hadn't done enough to merit its own article, so I set it up as a redirect like you have done with these other sides. The only real difference is I have bolded the name of the KSG side in the style used for the main topic of the article. I've seen that approach used here on the English wiki and over on de:. That may be the way to go if there is not sufficient material? It can always be updated if we come across fresh info.  +++$+++ :I don't have my Vereinslexikon handy, so I can't say how much info there is available on the club. I'll have to check in a day or so. I ran into a similar thing at [[HSV Barmbek-Uhlenhorst]] just the other day. Both that club and [[KSG Alsterdorf]] have their own Vereinslexikon entries as first division sides historically. Alsterdorf was a wartime side made up of several other clubs (including BU) and really hadn't done enough to merit its own article, so I set it up as a redirect like you have done with these other sides. The only real difference is I have bolded the name of the KSG side in the style used for the main topic of the article. I've seen that approach used here on the English wiki and over on de:. That may be the way to go if there is not sufficient material? It can always be updated if we come across fresh info. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 10:28, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
1022 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1020 +++$+++ 1021 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.211997060E09 +++$+++ True, an article can always be written once more is known about a club. Regarding those East German clubs, I feel, the association between the pre-1945 and past-1945 clubs seems sometimes sketchy. The communists tried hard to wipe out any connections after all. I don't think, for example, the current DSC has any real connection to the old [[Dresdner SC]], and so on. To much time had passed! Anyway, I guess I \"pile enough work\" on you, \"demanding\" all this club articles. Problem is, I write one Gauliga article and come past three or four teams that were quite prominent in this league, a ratio that disfavors you, Wiggy! Much easier for me there! I've decided I will only list Gauliga champions to keep the number resonable. Anyway, its fun, bringing those leagues and clubs \"back to live\". All the best from rainy Perth,  +++$+++ ::True, an article can always be written once more is known about a club. Regarding those East German clubs, I feel, the association between the pre-1945 and past-1945 clubs seems sometimes sketchy. The communists tried hard to wipe out any connections after all. I don't think, for example, the current DSC has any real connection to the old [[Dresdner SC]], and so on. To much time had passed! Anyway, I guess I "pile enough work" on you, "demanding" all this club articles. Problem is, I write one Gauliga article and come past three or four teams that were quite prominent in this league, a ratio that disfavors you, Wiggy! Much easier for me there! I've decided I will only list Gauliga champions to keep the number resonable. Anyway, its fun, bringing those leagues and clubs "back to live". All the best from rainy Perth, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 10:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
1023 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1020 +++$+++ 1022 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.211998500E09 +++$+++ An interesting turn here with our football club [[Toronto FC]]. They were a completely sad sack expansion team last season. So far this year they are competitive and nine games in have a winning record. That could turn, of course, but in the meantime its fun to watch. But what I'm really looking foward to Euro 2008 this summer!  +++$+++ :::An interesting turn here with our football club [[Toronto FC]]. They were a completely sad sack expansion team last season. So far this year they are competitive and nine games in have a winning record. That could turn, of course, but in the meantime its fun to watch. But what I'm really looking foward to Euro 2008 this summer! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 11:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

263165 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263165 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-11 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.268366520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for having a peek. I will clarify the PR request. The subject is indeed quite technical. Some of the articles on liver disease on Wikipedia are very good, thanks to Samir and the now departed Countincr. [[Hepatorenal syndrome]] is a really tough topic, yet it is FA.  +++$+++ Thanks for having a peek. I will clarify the PR request. The subject is indeed quite technical. Some of the articles on liver disease on Wikipedia are very good, thanks to Samir and the now departed Countincr. [[Hepatorenal syndrome]] is a really tough topic, yet it is FA. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 20:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
263166 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263165 +++$+++ 263165 +++$+++ 2010-03-11 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.268374200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the copyedit. Rather than waiting for the PR rigamarole, do you think it meets GA criteria and should I submit it?  +++$+++ :Thanks for the copyedit. Rather than waiting for the PR rigamarole, do you think it meets GA criteria and should I submit it? [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 22:10, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
263167 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263165 +++$+++ 263166 +++$+++ 2010-03-11 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.268375880E09 +++$+++ I'm only a little over half-way through my first reading of the article (told you I was slow). At the moment, I'm just trying to see if it makes sense and reads OK. Then I'll check up on the sources to see if it accurately reflects them and is comprehensive. So I couldn't really confirm if it is GA level yet but I suspect you wouldn't have any problems that couldn't be dealt with while \"on hold\". I'm a \"passed my driving test first time\" sort of person. Perhaps you could ping a few potential reviewers. The folk who turned up at my [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Ketogenic diet\/archive1|ketogenic diet peer review]] were mostly invited. I suspect Awadewit is so busy as to only have time for potential FAs but the other names on that PR would all make excellent choices. If you do decide to curtail the PR, I'll make\/continue my comments on the talk page, so I don't mind.  +++$+++ ::I'm only a little over half-way through my first reading of the article (told you I was slow). At the moment, I'm just trying to see if it makes sense and reads OK. Then I'll check up on the sources to see if it accurately reflects them and is comprehensive. So I couldn't really confirm if it is GA level yet but I suspect you wouldn't have any problems that couldn't be dealt with while "on hold". I'm a "passed my driving test first time" sort of person. Perhaps you could ping a few potential reviewers. The folk who turned up at my [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Ketogenic diet/archive1|ketogenic diet peer review]] were mostly invited. I suspect Awadewit is so busy as to only have time for potential FAs but the other names on that PR would all make excellent choices. If you do decide to curtail the PR, I'll make/continue my comments on the talk page, so I don't mind. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

1025 +++$+++ Fasach Nua +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1025 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-28 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.212016260E09 +++$+++ I am very flattered that you have choosen wikistalk me, however it may not be the most productive use of your time, and your outbursts do not reflect well on you as an editor  +++$+++ I am very flattered that you have choosen wikistalk me, however it may not be the most productive use of your time, and your outbursts do not reflect well on you as an editor [[User:Fasach Nua|Fasach Nua]] ([[User talk:Fasach Nua|talk]]) 16:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
1026 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1025 +++$+++ 1025 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.212019320E09 +++$+++ As to wikistalking, I remain unimpressed by your targeted attack on my image work in the midst of an on-going discussion about football club logos. You are not in any position deliver me that lecture. And despite everything we went through in that business, you choose to attempt to delete another logo image without real cause and without the courtesy of a meaningful explanation. Am I not supposed to notice that type of behaviour? I'm aware that this does reflect well on me as an editor. I'd rather be off puttering about at my own thing. But the principle is worth sticking up for and it doesn't burn me to on occasion give a leg up to other editors who are being blindsided or bullied by a persistently POV editor who can't see clear to abide by his own standards.  +++$+++ :As to wikistalking, I remain unimpressed by your targeted attack on my image work in the midst of an on-going discussion about football club logos. You are not in any position deliver me that lecture. And despite everything we went through in that business, you choose to attempt to delete another logo image without real cause and without the courtesy of a meaningful explanation. Am I not supposed to notice that type of behaviour? I'm aware that this does reflect well on me as an editor. I'd rather be off puttering about at my own thing. But the principle is worth sticking up for and it doesn't burn me to on occasion give a leg up to other editors who are being blindsided or bullied by a persistently POV editor who can't see clear to abide by his own standards. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 17:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
1027 +++$+++ Fasach Nua +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1025 +++$+++ 1026 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.212021540E09 +++$+++ It is good for you to actually address the issue, your analysis of the Ireland article is quite good,and I would encourage you to use the same analysis with other articles, the minimal usages issue with Gillespie is a particularly astute observence, and the sort of thing that is not applied enough. The one issue you missed was that '''all''' the images used in this article are [[Free_content|free]], and therefore they can be used in any way we choose. I actually think the Ireland article is a good example of how an article  can be written entirely without non-free content, which is very much part of the WP [[m:mission|goal]] of this project. I share your concerns about the logo, Ireland is fortunate to have a recognisable shape, that can be used in lieu of a logo, which is why I raised the issuse at the [[WP:FUR]], it was unfortunate that you view discussion of issues as \"[[Wikipedia:FUR#These_Logos|way off base]]\", I think there is a lot to be said for discussion and the sharing of ideas, rather than your bulldozing approach, I have  been having reasonably sensible discussion with [[User_talk:Fasach_Nua#Image:Manchester_United_Badge_1973-1998.png|peejay]] and [[Talk:Ulster_Bank|others]] befor you barged in ranting, and perhaps, you may consider [[wp:agf|engaging in the process]], and you might get somewhere.  +++$+++ ::It is good for you to actually address the issue, your analysis of the Ireland article is quite good,and I would encourage you to use the same analysis with other articles, the minimal usages issue with Gillespie is a particularly astute observence, and the sort of thing that is not applied enough. The one issue you missed was that '''all''' the images used in this article are [[Free_content|free]], and therefore they can be used in any way we choose. I actually think the Ireland article is a good example of how an article  can be written entirely without non-free content, which is very much part of the WP [[m:mission|goal]] of this project. I share your concerns about the logo, Ireland is fortunate to have a recognisable shape, that can be used in lieu of a logo, which is why I raised the issuse at the [[WP:FUR]], it was unfortunate that you view discussion of issues as "[[Wikipedia:FUR#These_Logos|way off base]]", I think there is a lot to be said for discussion and the sharing of ideas, rather than your bulldozing approach, I have  been having reasonably sensible discussion with [[User_talk:Fasach_Nua#Image:Manchester_United_Badge_1973-1998.png|peejay]] and [[Talk:Ulster_Bank|others]] befor you barged in ranting, and perhaps, you may consider [[wp:agf|engaging in the process]], and you might get somewhere. [[User:Fasach Nua|Fasach Nua]] ([[User talk:Fasach Nua|talk]]) 17:39, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
1028 +++$+++ Fasach Nua +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1025 +++$+++ 1026 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.212021720E09 +++$+++ On an aside you may want to look at [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Ireland national football team (1882-1950)\/archive1|this peer review]], can you spot the big issue needed to get this up to GA class?  +++$+++ ::On an aside you may want to look at [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Ireland national football team (1882-1950)/archive1|this peer review]], can you spot the big issue needed to get this up to GA class? [[User:Fasach Nua|Fasach Nua]] ([[User talk:Fasach Nua|talk]]) 17:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

525314 +++$+++ DRosenbach +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-14 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.179174360E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I cannot find an article that I began a while back, [[Baruch Pesach Mendelson|Rabbi Baruch Pesach Mendelson]]; I am thoroughly convinced that it has been erased from existance.  Could you please tell me when it was deleted, and how it was deleted without a note being placed on my talk page?  Thank you. ''' +++$+++ Hi.  I cannot find an article that I began a while back, [[Baruch Pesach Mendelson|Rabbi Baruch Pesach Mendelson]]; I am thoroughly convinced that it has been erased from existance.  Could you please tell me when it was deleted, and how it was deleted without a note being placed on my talk page?  Thank you. '''[[User:DRosenbach|DRosenbach]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:DRosenbach|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/DRosenbach|Contribs]])</sup> 13:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
525315 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525314 +++$+++ 525314 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.179210540E09 +++$+++ The discussion was at at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Baruch Pesach Mendelson]]. -- +++$+++ :The discussion was at at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baruch Pesach Mendelson]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

524459 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-03 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.191405300E09 +++$+++ I saw your note on a new user's page. Geez, I've been using <nowiki>{{welcome123}}<\/nowiki> for a few months now ... I hope I haven't scared too many contributors away! Regards,  +++$+++ I saw your note on a new user's page. Geez, I've been using <nowiki>{{welcome123}}</nowiki> for a few months now ... I hope I haven't scared too many contributors away! Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 02:55, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
524460 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524459 +++$+++ 524459 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.191405600E09 +++$+++ See just above. I'm not sure why they chose me, I don't think I'm an active sociology editor. Maybe because my username starts with A? About that template - well - maybe it's just the timid mouse point of view, but, yes, I have to admit, the huge box with about 50 or so links did look just a bit imposing to me, yes. I've been an admin for about a year, and I don't think ''I've'' read all those pages! :-) -- +++$+++ : See just above. I'm not sure why they chose me, I don't think I'm an active sociology editor. Maybe because my username starts with A? About that template - well - maybe it's just the timid mouse point of view, but, yes, I have to admit, the huge box with about 50 or so links did look just a bit imposing to me, yes. I've been an admin for about a year, and I don't think ''I've'' read all those pages! :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 03:00, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
524461 +++$+++ Masterpiece2000 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524459 +++$+++ 524460 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.191406020E09 +++$+++ I saw your user page and I thought that you are a friendly person. Anyway, if I face any problem, I will contact you. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::I saw your user page and I thought that you are a friendly person. Anyway, if I face any problem, I will contact you. Cheers. [[User:Masterpiece2000|Masterpiece2000]] 03:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
524462 +++$+++ Masterpiece2000 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524459 +++$+++ 524461 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.191406260E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the reply! I am interested in Sociology. However, I can contribute in many other fields. Cheers.  +++$+++ :::Thank you for the reply! I am interested in Sociology. However, I can contribute in many other fields. Cheers. [[User:Masterpiece2000|Masterpiece2000]] 03:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

525316 +++$+++ Whstchy +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525316 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.179737040E09 +++$+++ But the the [[BDCA-2]] is a redir to a red link.  Was that a goof on your part, or have you not gotten to the page it goes to?-- +++$+++ But the the [[BDCA-2]] is a redir to a red link.  Was that a goof on your part, or have you not gotten to the page it goes to?--[[User:Whstchy|'''W'''hs]][[User talk:Whstchy|'''t'''c]][[Special:Contributions/Whstchy|'''h'''y]] 01:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
525317 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525316 +++$+++ 525316 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.179737100E09 +++$+++ It's there now. -- +++$+++ :It's there now. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
525318 +++$+++ Whstchy +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525316 +++$+++ 525317 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.179737160E09 +++$+++ A, I see.  I was just checking recent changes and saw it.  Figured that was the case.-- +++$+++ ::A, I see.  I was just checking recent changes and saw it.  Figured that was the case.--[[User:Whstchy|'''W'''hs]][[User talk:Whstchy|'''t'''c]][[Special:Contributions/Whstchy|'''h'''y]] 01:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

1029 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1029 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-31 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.212230100E09 +++$+++ After writting the [[Gauliga Nordmark]] article, I came across this: [[Eimsb\xfctteler TV]]. I will try to find out some more about the club but we may need your \"magic book\"!  +++$+++ After writting the [[Gauliga Nordmark]] article, I came across this: [[Eimsbütteler TV]]. I will try to find out some more about the club but we may need your "magic book"! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 03:35, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
1030 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1029 +++$+++ 1029 +++$+++ 2008-05-31 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.212240420E09 +++$+++ I managed to expand the article from one sentence, its a bit better now.  +++$+++ :I managed to expand the article from one sentence, its a bit better now. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 06:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

1031 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-16 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.213610880E09 +++$+++ Missed your contributions, good to see you back!  +++$+++ Missed your contributions, good to see you back! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 03:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
1032 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1031 +++$+++ 1031 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.213690140E09 +++$+++ Yeah, thought I could stand the diversion. Added [[VfL K\xf6ln 99]] if you'd be inclined to tune it up some. Thanks. See you around.  +++$+++ :Yeah, thought I could stand the diversion. Added [[VfL Köln 99]] if you'd be inclined to tune it up some. Thanks. See you around. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 01:09, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
1033 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1031 +++$+++ 1032 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.213691400E09 +++$+++ Had a quick look, put in some league links. Have to do some \"real work\" now! Have fun,  +++$+++ ::Had a quick look, put in some league links. Have to do some "real work" now! Have fun, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 01:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

263176 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263176 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-09 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.270864080E09 +++$+++ I think your proposed amendments to the alt text guidelines were a ''vast'' improvement, and a gigantic step in the right direction. I take my hat off to you (well, I would if I actually had a hat) for sticking with this thorny issue and trying to drive it to some kind of conclusion.  +++$+++ I think your proposed amendments to the alt text guidelines were a ''vast'' improvement, and a gigantic step in the right direction. I take my hat off to you (well, I would if I actually had a hat) for sticking with this thorny issue and trying to drive it to some kind of conclusion. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 18:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
263177 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263176 +++$+++ 263176 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.270872720E09 +++$+++ Thank you. That's appreciated. Could you voice your approval at the proposal on the talk page, just so any consensus for change can be recorded.  +++$+++ :Thank you. That's appreciated. Could you voice your approval at the proposal on the talk page, just so any consensus for change can be recorded. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:12, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
263178 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263176 +++$+++ 263177 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.270873680E09 +++$+++ Will do.  +++$+++ ::Will do. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 21:28, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

1034 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-22 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.214135760E09 +++$+++ A piece of good news: the [[Karlsruher FV]] has returned to league football, I just found out! Nice to see such a historic club of German football return. Took it out of the ''Defunct'' category straight away.  +++$+++ A piece of good news: the [[Karlsruher FV]] has returned to league football, I just found out! Nice to see such a historic club of German football return. Took it out of the ''Defunct'' category straight away. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 04:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
1035 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1034 +++$+++ 1034 +++$+++ 2008-06-22 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.214136060E09 +++$+++ That is interesting. What level will they be playing at to begin with? It would be quite the sight to see the club return and eventually make a mark.  +++$+++ :That is interesting. What level will they be playing at to begin with? It would be quite the sight to see the club return and eventually make a mark. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 05:01, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
1036 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1034 +++$+++ 1035 +++$+++ 2008-06-22 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.214136660E09 +++$+++ Oops. My bad. Neglected to check your addition. Gotta go check their website. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Oops. My bad. Neglected to check your addition. Gotta go check their website. Thanks. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 05:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

263180 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-28 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.275069480E09 +++$+++ Hey, Colin-- I hope you're well!  Did you ever get the Kushner ''Cursing Brain'' book?  I'm traveling, and even when I return home, I may find that I've already packed it off to storage for my pending ... lifestyle changes.  If you have that book, you might help me deal with a tedious issue.  Why is it that those articles can sit dormant for months, but every time I travel, someone decides to muck up TS or PANDAS articles? <rhetorical>  Best,  +++$+++ Hey, Colin-- I hope you're well!  Did you ever get the Kushner ''Cursing Brain'' book?  I'm traveling, and even when I return home, I may find that I've already packed it off to storage for my pending ... lifestyle changes.  If you have that book, you might help me deal with a tedious issue.  Why is it that those articles can sit dormant for months, but every time I travel, someone decides to muck up TS or PANDAS articles? <rhetorical>  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 10:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
263181 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263180 +++$+++ 263180 +++$+++ 2010-05-29 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.275171120E09 +++$+++ Hi Sandy. Yes, I'm well but busy IRL as usual. I've got Kushner. What do you want to know?  +++$+++ :Hi Sandy. Yes, I'm well but busy IRL as usual. I've got Kushner. What do you want to know? [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

525326 +++$+++ Rustavo +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-24 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.180055700E09 +++$+++ Hey again. I was just curious about your effort (not that you're the only one involved) to codify disease-oriented pages and headings according to ICD-10. Is there some discussion or Wikiproject which describes the scope and guidelines of the effort? I'm not opposed or anything - it seems quite helpful - but since seems to involve a lot of changes to a lot of pages, I was just curious how it had been planned. Thanks. - +++$+++ Hey again. I was just curious about your effort (not that you're the only one involved) to codify disease-oriented pages and headings according to ICD-10. Is there some discussion or Wikiproject which describes the scope and guidelines of the effort? I'm not opposed or anything - it seems quite helpful - but since seems to involve a lot of changes to a lot of pages, I was just curious how it had been planned. Thanks. -[[User:Rustavo|Rustavo]]<sup>[[User_talk:Rustavo|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Rustavo|Contribs]]</sup> 18:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
525327 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525326 +++$+++ 525326 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.180063980E09 +++$+++ There is no single Wikiproject that I am aware of which provides what you are looking for -- the closest match is probably [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)]]. -- +++$+++ :There is no single Wikiproject that I am aware of which provides what you are looking for -- the closest match is probably [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 20:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
525328 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525326 +++$+++ 525327 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.180067220E09 +++$+++ I'm not happy having it cluttering up the bottom of [[Tourette syndrome]] (I dislike excessive navigational templates and don't feel it adds anything to the article except size), but I guess there's nothing I can do about it :\/  I also don't like the undue weight it gives to the ICD-10 coding scheme over other schemes, and the fact that TS is a neurological condition.  I'd be really happy if I could remove it.   +++$+++ ::I'm not happy having it cluttering up the bottom of [[Tourette syndrome]] (I dislike excessive navigational templates and don't feel it adds anything to the article except size), but I guess there's nothing I can do about it :/  I also don't like the undue weight it gives to the ICD-10 coding scheme over other schemes, and the fact that TS is a neurological condition.  I'd be really happy if I could remove it.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
525329 +++$+++ Rustavo +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525326 +++$+++ 525328 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.180068720E09 +++$+++ There is no specific discussion of adding ICD-10 codes to articles on [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)]] (although it does suggest ICD-10 as a good source for article names). I think it would be a good idea to lay out some guidelines and points for discussion about just where it is and is not appropriate to stick the codes themselves. I suspect you may start to get more comments like the one above unless there is a central forum for reaching consensus about this effort. For example, many editors might object to sticking ICD-10 codes into the subject headings of an article, as in [[alcoholic liver disease]], since they will probably not be understood by most readers. Might I suggest you start a discussion on [[Talk:List of ICD-10 codes]] or (better yet) a subpage of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine]] where you lay out a systematic plan for ICD-10 coding of articles, so that others can comment on it? Thanks, and good luck with the effort. - +++$+++ :::There is no specific discussion of adding ICD-10 codes to articles on [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)]] (although it does suggest ICD-10 as a good source for article names). I think it would be a good idea to lay out some guidelines and points for discussion about just where it is and is not appropriate to stick the codes themselves. I suspect you may start to get more comments like the one above unless there is a central forum for reaching consensus about this effort. For example, many editors might object to sticking ICD-10 codes into the subject headings of an article, as in [[alcoholic liver disease]], since they will probably not be understood by most readers. Might I suggest you start a discussion on [[Talk:List of ICD-10 codes]] or (better yet) a subpage of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine]] where you lay out a systematic plan for ICD-10 coding of articles, so that others can comment on it? Thanks, and good luck with the effort. -[[User:Rustavo|Rustavo]]<sup>[[User_talk:Rustavo|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Rustavo|Contribs]]</sup> 21:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
525330 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525326 +++$+++ 525329 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.180069140E09 +++$+++ It isn't productive to have this discussion on a single user's talkpage, so I won't respond further here, but if either of you would like to discuss this further, please select a public forum (Wikiproject, mediation, or other), and let me know which one you've chosen.  -- +++$+++ ::::It isn't productive to have this discussion on a single user's talkpage, so I won't respond further here, but if either of you would like to discuss this further, please select a public forum (Wikiproject, mediation, or other), and let me know which one you've chosen.  --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 21:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
525331 +++$+++ Rustavo +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525326 +++$+++ 525330 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.180071600E09 +++$+++ OK, I posted my general request at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine]]. Again, it's not so much a criticism as a desire for clear guidelines and consensus. - +++$+++ :::::OK, I posted my general request at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine]]. Again, it's not so much a criticism as a desire for clear guidelines and consensus. -[[User:Rustavo|Rustavo]]<sup>[[User_talk:Rustavo|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Rustavo|Contribs]]</sup> 22:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

1039 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1039 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-05 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.215324840E09 +++$+++ Just a quick question about this article, Wiggy. Is the club defunct or has it merged into the MTV Heide again? I can't find anything on the HFC in current tables but the MTV was playing [http:\/\/www.fussball.de\/fussball\/servlet\/content\/90?next=%2F0708%2F013%2F054%2F051%2F040435&tag=50001 here last season]. Should it be added to the article?  +++$+++ Just a quick question about this article, Wiggy. Is the club defunct or has it merged into the MTV Heide again? I can't find anything on the HFC in current tables but the MTV was playing [http://www.fussball.de/fussball/servlet/content/90?next=%2F0708%2F013%2F054%2F051%2F040435&tag=50001 here last season]. Should it be added to the article? [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 23:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
1040 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1039 +++$+++ 1039 +++$+++ 2008-07-07 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.215415440E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure to be honest. I'll have to sniff around to see if I can find a current reference.  +++$+++ :I'm not sure to be honest. I'll have to sniff around to see if I can find a current reference. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 00:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

1041 +++$+++ Ryan Postlethwaite +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1041 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-17 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.216290240E09 +++$+++ You're baiting him now. He's blocked, so please just drop it. If you post to his talk page again I'm going to block you.  +++$+++ You're baiting him now. He's blocked, so please just drop it. If you post to his talk page again I'm going to block you. [[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|'''<font color="#000088">Ry<font color="#220066">an<font color="#550044"> P<font color="#770022">os<font color="#aa0000">tl</font>et</font>hw</font>ai</font>te</font>''']] 03:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
1042 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1041 +++$+++ 1041 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.216290840E09 +++$+++ The guy is a bully. Sure he's blocked, but it hasn't changed his behavior one lick. You know as well as I do that as soon as the block is done he'll be right back at it. So yeah, dropped for now. But it'll be more of the same from him down the road. I can't fathom why people rush to the guy's defense all the time when his conduct is so thuggish and its been made clear to him over and over again that he can choose to do otherwise.  +++$+++ :The guy is a bully. Sure he's blocked, but it hasn't changed his behavior one lick. You know as well as I do that as soon as the block is done he'll be right back at it. So yeah, dropped for now. But it'll be more of the same from him down the road. I can't fathom why people rush to the guy's defense all the time when his conduct is so thuggish and its been made clear to him over and over again that he can choose to do otherwise. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 03:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
1043 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1041 +++$+++ 1041 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.216778520E09 +++$+++ My interest is German football in general, although DD is a fascinating club in its own right. No trouble with the FV stuff. I write\/patch basic club articles all the time. I don't generally do rosters, just club histories and profiles. Thanks for the offer though. Have tons of fun.  +++$+++ :My interest is German football in general, although DD is a fascinating club in its own right. No trouble with the FV stuff. I write/patch basic club articles all the time. I don't generally do rosters, just club histories and profiles. Thanks for the offer though. Have tons of fun. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 19:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

1044 +++$+++ SGD-LFC +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-23 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.216839720E09 +++$+++ Hi again I just wanted to ask if you could tell how I can upload the logo for FV Dresden i have tried it already and it won't work. Please check! Thanks-- +++$+++ Hi again I just wanted to ask if you could tell how I can upload the logo for FV Dresden i have tried it already and it won't work. Please check! Thanks--[[User:SGD-LFC|SGD-LFC]] ([[User talk:SGD-LFC|talk]]) 12:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
1045 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1044 +++$+++ 1044 +++$+++ 2008-07-24 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.216894020E09 +++$+++ Done. I simplified the name and I'm guessing that if you tried to upload the file from de:wiki it was a .gif rather than a .png, so that may have caused it to bomb out. It's all properly tagged and ready to go.  +++$+++ :Done. I simplified the name and I'm guessing that if you tried to upload the file from de:wiki it was a .gif rather than a .png, so that may have caused it to bomb out. It's all properly tagged and ready to go. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 03:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

1046 +++$+++ Domiy +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-03 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.217775300E09 +++$+++ Please help us reach a verdict on this section instead of making constant edits and turning it into an edit war!  +++$+++ Please help us reach a verdict on this section instead of making constant edits and turning it into an edit war! [[User:Domiy|Domiy]] ([[User talk:Domiy|talk]]) 07:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
1047 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1046 +++$+++ 1046 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.217800560E09 +++$+++ Yes, I can go and edit pages to my own liking. So can you. That's how it is here. At some point a proper article will come out of the process. We're not in any kind of edit war, so don't be characterizing this episode as such. I'm an able writer, proficient in English (where the article also needs considerable help), and have a long list of contributions here. I try real hard to be straight up in what I write and avoid overly favourable or negative language. You want help with the verdict? This is some of that help. It might be a little bitter, but look hard at the article, compare it to others of the same type, and work hard at managing what is, to folks who are not so passionate about the Croation national team, way too much spin.  +++$+++ :Yes, I can go and edit pages to my own liking. So can you. That's how it is here. At some point a proper article will come out of the process. We're not in any kind of edit war, so don't be characterizing this episode as such. I'm an able writer, proficient in English (where the article also needs considerable help), and have a long list of contributions here. I try real hard to be straight up in what I write and avoid overly favourable or negative language. You want help with the verdict? This is some of that help. It might be a little bitter, but look hard at the article, compare it to others of the same type, and work hard at managing what is, to folks who are not so passionate about the Croation national team, way too much spin. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 14:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

1048 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-05 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.217966520E09 +++$+++ These are the two regions I would like to do next, if you could pass on your opinion, it would be great! Have fun,  +++$+++ These are the two regions I would like to do next, if you could pass on your opinion, it would be great! Have fun, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 13:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
1049 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1048 +++$+++ 1048 +++$+++ 2008-08-05 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.217976540E09 +++$+++ Yes, I think the category idea is overdue, especially given the existence of some of these already, so good for you for the effort. I would tend toward Saarland, Palatinate, etc. That matches the usage of state names in the articles, and also follows the practise being used in naming national football teams i.e. Germany national football team and France national football team vs. German national football team, French national football team, Italy\/Italian, Zambia\/Zambian, etc. That's my two bits, thanks for asking. Anybody else weigh in on the question?  +++$+++ :Yes, I think the category idea is overdue, especially given the existence of some of these already, so good for you for the effort. I would tend toward Saarland, Palatinate, etc. That matches the usage of state names in the articles, and also follows the practise being used in naming national football teams i.e. Germany national football team and France national football team vs. German national football team, French national football team, Italy/Italian, Zambia/Zambian, etc. That's my two bits, thanks for asking. Anybody else weigh in on the question? [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 15:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
1050 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1048 +++$+++ 1049 +++$+++ 2008-08-05 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.217981220E09 +++$+++ Agrre on nouns instead of adjectives. Also English names, not the German ones. -- +++$+++ ::Agrre on nouns instead of adjectives. Also English names, not the German ones. --[[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 17:07, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
1051 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1048 +++$+++ 1050 +++$+++ 2008-08-06 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.218007080E09 +++$+++ Thanks MC, much appreciated.  +++$+++ :::Thanks MC, much appreciated. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 00:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

480772 +++$+++ Celestianpower +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-25 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.145999760E09 +++$+++ They can't vote because they need to give the illusion of neutrality; it gives the system credibility. Regards, --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Celestianpower\/Esperanza|es]]<\/font> +++$+++ They can't vote because they need to give the illusion of neutrality; it gives the system credibility. Regards, --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color="green">[[User:Celestianpower/Esperanza|es]]</font>[[User:Celestianpower|tianpower]] <sup>[[user talk:Celestianpower|háblame]]</sup> 14:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
480773 +++$+++ Celestianpower +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480772 +++$+++ 480772 +++$+++ 2006-04-23 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.145827500E09 +++$+++ Heh - I was trying my hand at [[sarcasm]], sorry. Since they haven't voted, they are, in the usual sense of the word, neutral. --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Celestianpower\/Esperanza|es]]<\/font>arial +++$+++ : Heh - I was trying my hand at [[sarcasm]], sorry. Since they haven't voted, they are, in the usual sense of the word, neutral. --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color="green">[[User:Celestianpower/Esperanza|es]]</font>arial[[User:Celestianpower|tianpower]] <sup>[[user talk:Celestianpower|háblame]]</sup> 14:25, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
480774 +++$+++ Celestianpower +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480772 +++$+++ 480773 +++$+++ 2006-04-25 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.146000840E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I've run afoul of that a few times. Facial expressions and tonality are very important in [[humour]]. --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color=\"pink\">[[User:Celestianpower\/Esperanza|es]]<\/font> +++$+++ :: Yeah, I've run afoul of that a few times. Facial expressions and tonality are very important in [[humour]]. --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color="pink">[[User:Celestianpower/Esperanza|es]]</font>[[User:Celestianpower|tianpower]] <sup>[[user talk:Celestianpower|háblame]]</lrt> 14:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

1052 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1052 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-06 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.218009120E09 +++$+++ Thanks guys, much appreciated. I think, I prefer nouns, too. ''Saarlandian'' sounds a bit funny! Regarding the rain, Wiggy, I know how you feel, it always seems to rain in my six days off while its beautiful sunshine on the eight I have to work!  +++$+++ Thanks guys, much appreciated. I think, I prefer nouns, too. ''Saarlandian'' sounds a bit funny! Regarding the rain, Wiggy, I know how you feel, it always seems to rain in my six days off while its beautiful sunshine on the eight I have to work! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
1053 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1052 +++$+++ 1052 +++$+++ 2008-08-06 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.218009360E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that sort of weather convinces me that there is at least some sort of order to the universe - just not the order I might prefer. It's raining again now ... <sigh> ... and, yes, it is my day off.  +++$+++ :Yeah, that sort of weather convinces me that there is at least some sort of order to the universe - just not the order I might prefer. It's raining again now ... <sigh> ... and, yes, it is my day off. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 00:56, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
1054 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1052 +++$+++ 1053 +++$+++ 2008-08-06 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.218018840E09 +++$+++ I hope, you don't hate me when I say, we are actually having a beautiful day! Anyway, just updated the Saar clubs for 2008, have a read of [[SV Saar 05 Saarbr\xfccken]], sounds like a bad TV show what went on there!  +++$+++ ::I hope, you don't hate me when I say, we are actually having a beautiful day! Anyway, just updated the Saar clubs for 2008, have a read of [[SV Saar 05 Saarbrücken]], sounds like a bad TV show what went on there! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 03:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

263197 +++$+++ Tim Ivorson +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263197 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-28 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.112083140E09 +++$+++ I see that you have replaced the infobox I added with an HTML one like those used by some other radio station articles. Do you know of a WikiProject where the radio station infobox could be discussed? Perhaps we should start one.  +++$+++ I see that you have replaced the infobox I added with an HTML one like those used by some other radio station articles. Do you know of a WikiProject where the radio station infobox could be discussed? Perhaps we should start one. [[User:Tim Ivorson|Tim Ivorson]] 23:59, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
263198 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263197 +++$+++ 263197 +++$+++ 2005-03-29 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.112083800E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure if there is a discussion. I've never been aware of any controversy in the matter.  The info box I placed onto [[talkSPORT]] is the only style of box I have seen in my (reasonably substantial) work\/readings on radio articles.  I simply changed them for the sake of consistency. That whole article needs a major upheaval anyway.  +++$+++ :I'm not sure if there is a discussion. I've never been aware of any controversy in the matter.  The info box I placed onto [[talkSPORT]] is the only style of box I have seen in my (reasonably substantial) work/readings on radio articles.  I simply changed them for the sake of consistency. That whole article needs a major upheaval anyway. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 00:10, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

1055 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1055 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-06 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.218053700E09 +++$+++ I thought, how did I miss this one this morning, I thought I done them all! Easy answer, you just created it!  +++$+++ I thought, how did I miss this one this morning, I thought I done them all! Easy answer, you just created it! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 13:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
1056 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1055 +++$+++ 1055 +++$+++ 2008-08-06 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.218054000E09 +++$+++ Just got started on it. I'm away from my reference books for a couple days and there's no de: article to take from, so I had to do this one the old-fashioned way by digging around for information. Its coming together slowly. Had to break off part way through to get some sleep. Good to see your category tagging project moving along so swiftly.  +++$+++ :Just got started on it. I'm away from my reference books for a couple days and there's no de: article to take from, so I had to do this one the old-fashioned way by digging around for information. Its coming together slowly. Had to break off part way through to get some sleep. Good to see your category tagging project moving along so swiftly. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 13:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
1057 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1055 +++$+++ 1056 +++$+++ 2008-08-06 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.218054300E09 +++$+++ Yeah, heaps of work, but by breaking it up into states its so much easier to tackle. Southern Germany is almost done, I might let somebody else worry about the north, at least for now.  +++$+++ ::Yeah, heaps of work, but by breaking it up into states its so much easier to tackle. Southern Germany is almost done, I might let somebody else worry about the north, at least for now. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 13:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

525344 +++$+++ Flyguy649 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525344 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.180615680E09 +++$+++ I changed the redirect you made into an article. However, I have it written about both cation-dependent and cation-independent MPRs. Thinking about things, it might be better to move \"my\" CI-MPR info to [[Insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor]], cut down what's left to a minimal bit and use {{tl|mainarticle}} (for example) to link to IGF-2R. There are other ways to do things, but this might be the best. What are your thoughts?  +++$+++ I changed the redirect you made into an article. However, I have it written about both cation-dependent and cation-independent MPRs. Thinking about things, it might be better to move "my" CI-MPR info to [[Insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor]], cut down what's left to a minimal bit and use {{tl|mainarticle}} (for example) to link to IGF-2R. There are other ways to do things, but this might be the best. What are your thoughts? [[User:Flyguy649|Flyguy649]]<sup>[[User talk:Flyguy649|talk]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Flyguy649|<sub>contribs]]</sub> 05:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
525345 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525344 +++$+++ 525344 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.180636320E09 +++$+++ That probably seems like the best approach. -- +++$+++ :That probably seems like the best approach. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 11:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
525346 +++$+++ Flyguy649 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525344 +++$+++ 525345 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.180658340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your input. It was getting late and the brain wasn't working so well anymore!  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your input. It was getting late and the brain wasn't working so well anymore! [[User:Flyguy649|Flyguy649]]<sup>[[User talk:Flyguy649|talk]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Flyguy649|<sub>contribs]]</sub> 17:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

263201 +++$+++ Lachatdelarue +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-04-04 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.112651880E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to thank you for trying to help Karello and Elias settle their dispute. I tried, but, as I stated in my first reply after Elias asked for my input, I'm not good at dispute resolution. Hopefully with your guidance this thing can come to a conclusion.  +++$+++ I just wanted to thank you for trying to help Karello and Elias settle their dispute. I tried, but, as I stated in my first reply after Elias asked for my input, I'm not good at dispute resolution. Hopefully with your guidance this thing can come to a conclusion. [[User:Lachatdelarue|Lachatdelarue]] [[User_talk:Lachatdelarue|(talk)]] 14:58, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
263202 +++$+++ EliasAlucard +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263201 +++$+++ 263201 +++$+++ 2005-04-05 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.112685540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:EliasAlucard|EliasAlucard]]|[[User talk:EliasAlucard|Talk]] 00:19, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
263203 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263201 +++$+++ 263202 +++$+++ 2005-04-04 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.112679240E09 +++$+++ Thanks to both of you for your comments. Appreciated.  +++$+++ ::Thanks to both of you for your comments. Appreciated. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 22:34, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

1058 +++$+++ Domiy +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1058 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-10 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.218387120E09 +++$+++ I would appreciate some advice ASAP, thanks!  +++$+++ I would appreciate some advice ASAP, thanks! [[User:Domiy|Domiy]] ([[User talk:Domiy|talk]]) 09:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
1059 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1058 +++$+++ 1058 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.218478800E09 +++$+++ Sorry, D, but I'm thinking it still reads more like a fan page than an encyclopedia article. It needs a more neutral tone and still needs a lot of help with English. Maybe go read a handful of the existing national team articles to get a feel for the general approach and get hooked up with an English speaking editor. If you go back and look at the archives of the previous FAC's, you will see those two points coming up repeatedly.  +++$+++ :Sorry, D, but I'm thinking it still reads more like a fan page than an encyclopedia article. It needs a more neutral tone and still needs a lot of help with English. Maybe go read a handful of the existing national team articles to get a feel for the general approach and get hooked up with an English speaking editor. If you go back and look at the archives of the previous FAC's, you will see those two points coming up repeatedly. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 11:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

525347 +++$+++ CeilingCrash +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.181099280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:CeilingCrash|CeilingCrash]] 20:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
525348 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525347 +++$+++ 525347 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.181099700E09 +++$+++ You [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Asperger_syndrome&diff=136131809&oldid=136120484 added] an external link to the \"See also\" section. Please review [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]] and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)]].  -- +++$+++ :You [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asperger_syndrome&diff=136131809&oldid=136120484 added] an external link to the "See also" section. Please review [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]] and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)]].  --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 20:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

1060 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1060 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-10 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.218396600E09 +++$+++ I found this article, [[FC B\xfcsingen]], pretty abandoned, like a stray dog. I put in all I could find, does your \"bible\"  have anything on it? If we manage to expand it 5-fold its an excellent canidad for DYK!  +++$+++ I found this article, [[FC Büsingen]], pretty abandoned, like a stray dog. I put in all I could find, does your "bible"  have anything on it? If we manage to expand it 5-fold its an excellent canidad for DYK! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 12:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
1061 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1060 +++$+++ 1060 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 11:23:00 +++$+++ 1.218478980E09 +++$+++ I have uploaded the club logo and will see what else I can find and copy edit over the next day or so. Thanks for bringing it to my attention!  +++$+++ :I have uploaded the club logo and will see what else I can find and copy edit over the next day or so. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 11:23, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

525349 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525349 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-08 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.181288220E09 +++$+++ Hey, please vote in the infobox jersey number poll at [[Template talk:Infobox NFL player]]. +++$+++ Hey, please vote in the infobox jersey number poll at [[Template talk:Infobox NFL player]].[[User:Chrisjnelson|Chris Nelson]] 00:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
525350 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525349 +++$+++ 525349 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.181550000E09 +++$+++ Sorry I never got around to voting, but I think the consensus that emerged is pretty reasonable. Most importantly, I'm glad that the jersey number is a distinct field, and not appended to the name field. -- +++$+++ :Sorry I never got around to voting, but I think the consensus that emerged is pretty reasonable. Most importantly, I'm glad that the jersey number is a distinct field, and not appended to the name field. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

1063 +++$+++ Aaron carass +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1063 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-15 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.218793140E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Aaron carass|Aaron carass]] ([[User talk:Aaron carass|talk]]) 02:39, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
1064 +++$+++ Aaron carass +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1063 +++$+++ 1063 +++$+++ 2008-08-15 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.218851640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Aaron carass|Aaron carass]] ([[User talk:Aaron carass|talk]]) 18:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

174940 +++$+++ GDuwen +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ 174940 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-28 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.301356500E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for taking the time to correct the copy-edits on the article. I just wanted to know if the work was completely done or you have to do more work, the reason I ask this is just to know if it is copy-edit free to nominate it already to GA. In case that the work is already done, could you place the {{[[Template:Copy edit|copyedit]]}} template? Thanks again for your time.--<span style=\"background:#75B2DD; padding:2px;\" > +++$+++ Hi, thanks for taking the time to correct the copy-edits on the article. I just wanted to know if the work was completely done or you have to do more work, the reason I ask this is just to know if it is copy-edit free to nominate it already to GA. In case that the work is already done, could you place the {{[[Template:Copy edit|copyedit]]}} template? Thanks again for your time.--<span style="background:#75B2DD; padding:2px;" >[[User:GDuwen|<font color="#E62020" size="2.5px">'''GD'''</font><font color="#273BE2" size="2.5px">'''uwen'''</font>]]</span>[[User talk:GDuwen|<span style="background:#318CE7; padding:2px;" ><font color="cyan" size="0.5px">'''Tell me!'''</font></span>]] 16:55, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
174941 +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ 174940 +++$+++ 174940 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.301364960E09 +++$+++ I'm done (though that intro is a bit long IMO). I'm also confused. Why do you want a copyedit template? That would indicate that I didn't do a good job.  +++$+++ :I'm done (though that intro is a bit long IMO). I'm also confused. Why do you want a copyedit template? That would indicate that I didn't do a good job. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend#top|talk]]) 19:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

263210 +++$+++ Adrian Robson +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-05-26 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.117162740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for putting Beamish back - hadn't meant to drop it!  +++$+++ Thanks for putting Beamish back - hadn't meant to drop it! [[User:Adrian Robson|Adrian Robson]] 19:59, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
263211 +++$+++ Paulo Oliveira +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263210 +++$+++ 263210 +++$+++ 2005-06-06 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.118072280E09 +++$+++ Sure!  +++$+++ :Sure! [[User:Paulo Oliveira|Paulo Oliveira]] 08:38, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
263212 +++$+++ Paulo Oliveira +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263210 +++$+++ 263211 +++$+++ 2005-06-06 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.118074200E09 +++$+++ I know that if a sub-category exists we should use it, but I didn't at the time. Thanks anyway.  +++$+++ ::I know that if a sub-category exists we should use it, but I didn't at the time. Thanks anyway. [[User:Paulo Oliveira|Paulo Oliveira]] 09:10, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

1067 +++$+++ FairuseBot +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-11 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.221125340E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. -- +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. --[[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]] ([[User talk:FairuseBot|talk]]) 02:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
1068 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1067 +++$+++ 1067 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.221199440E09 +++$+++ Resolved.  +++$+++ *Resolved. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 23:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

1069 +++$+++ FairuseBot +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-11 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.221133980E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. -- +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. --[[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]] ([[User talk:FairuseBot|talk]]) 04:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
1070 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1069 +++$+++ 1069 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.221199920E09 +++$+++ Resolved.  +++$+++ * Resolved. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 23:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

122242 +++$+++ Best O Fortuna +++$+++ Monkeyzpop +++$+++ 122242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-20 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.235158200E09 +++$+++ >  +++$+++ > [[User:Best O Fortuna|Best O Fortuna]] ([[User talk:Best O Fortuna|talk]]) 11:30, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
122243 +++$+++ Best O Fortuna +++$+++ Monkeyzpop +++$+++ 122242 +++$+++ 122242 +++$+++ 2009-02-21 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.235220300E09 +++$+++ >  +++$+++ :> [[User:Best O Fortuna|Best O Fortuna]] ([[User talk:Best O Fortuna|talk]]) 04:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

525359 +++$+++ Rustavo +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525359 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-20 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.182340440E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcadian. I noticed that you performed a move and disambiguation on the page [[Fusion protein]], a few months ago, moving that content to the page [[Recombinant fusion protein]]. I'd have to say that I don't agree with the usefulness of the current arrangement. I think the concept of a \"fusion protein\", as in a polypeptide whose sequence is derived from the \"fusion\" of sequences from two originally separate proteins, can and should be discussed on a single page. That page could include separate sections for discussing the various contexts in which fusion proteins appear (recombinant technology, naturally occurring translocations in cancer, evolution, etc) Since you created the disambig page and restricted the scope of the page to [[recombinant fusion protein]], there really isn't an obvious page for me to link to in discussing fusion proteins in the context of translocations, and the meaningful page is now harder for others to find and link to. I've never heard of [[membrane fusion proteins]] being referred to as simply \"fusion proteins\", but if that is a concern, it would be simple to put an {{tl|otheruses4}} link to that page at the top of a restored unitary [[fusion protein]] page. Let me know if you would be amenable to the change. Thanks. - +++$+++ Hi Arcadian. I noticed that you performed a move and disambiguation on the page [[Fusion protein]], a few months ago, moving that content to the page [[Recombinant fusion protein]]. I'd have to say that I don't agree with the usefulness of the current arrangement. I think the concept of a "fusion protein", as in a polypeptide whose sequence is derived from the "fusion" of sequences from two originally separate proteins, can and should be discussed on a single page. That page could include separate sections for discussing the various contexts in which fusion proteins appear (recombinant technology, naturally occurring translocations in cancer, evolution, etc) Since you created the disambig page and restricted the scope of the page to [[recombinant fusion protein]], there really isn't an obvious page for me to link to in discussing fusion proteins in the context of translocations, and the meaningful page is now harder for others to find and link to. I've never heard of [[membrane fusion proteins]] being referred to as simply "fusion proteins", but if that is a concern, it would be simple to put an {{tl|otheruses4}} link to that page at the top of a restored unitary [[fusion protein]] page. Let me know if you would be amenable to the change. Thanks. -[[User:Rustavo|Rustavo]]<sup>[[User_talk:Rustavo|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Rustavo|Contribs]]</sup> 04:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
525360 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525359 +++$+++ 525359 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.182370500E09 +++$+++ I think it is important to keep a clear distinction between [[Recombinant fusion proteins]], [[Oncogene fusion proteins]], and [[Membrane fusion proteins]], because [[MeSH]] makes such a clear distinction between them. However, if you feel that one of them should get the [[fusion protein]] page as the main topic, with the others being referenced via \"otheruses4\", I'd have no problem with such a rearrangement. -- +++$+++ :I think it is important to keep a clear distinction between [[Recombinant fusion proteins]], [[Oncogene fusion proteins]], and [[Membrane fusion proteins]], because [[MeSH]] makes such a clear distinction between them. However, if you feel that one of them should get the [[fusion protein]] page as the main topic, with the others being referenced via "otheruses4", I'd have no problem with such a rearrangement. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 13:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
525361 +++$+++ Rustavo +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525359 +++$+++ 525360 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.182423960E09 +++$+++ OK, but a \"clear distinction\" between the first two can be made on a single page ([[fusion protein]]), as well as the concept MeSH refers to as \"chimeric mutant proteins\" (of which I believe \"oncogene fusion proteins\" are a subset.) The page could then discuss concepts, such as the modularity of protein functional domains, which are common to understanding all \"fusion proteins,\" defined as proteins formed through the joining of part or all of two originally separate polypeptide sequences.  Obviously \"viral fusion protein\" and \"membrane fusion protein\" are unrelated concepts, and if you think we need to link to a disambig page ([[fusion protein (disambiguation)]]) from the main [[fusion protein]] page, we could do that. I guess I'm just more of a lumper than a splitter, but I'd rather have one solid page that is intuitive to link to than a list of hard-to-find stubs, some discussing closely related concepts, and others discussing concepts which are completely different. The page [[chimera (protein)]] (which I only just noticed) should probably be merged with the common [[fusion protein]] page. - +++$+++ ::OK, but a "clear distinction" between the first two can be made on a single page ([[fusion protein]]), as well as the concept MeSH refers to as "chimeric mutant proteins" (of which I believe "oncogene fusion proteins" are a subset.) The page could then discuss concepts, such as the modularity of protein functional domains, which are common to understanding all "fusion proteins," defined as proteins formed through the joining of part or all of two originally separate polypeptide sequences.  Obviously "viral fusion protein" and "membrane fusion protein" are unrelated concepts, and if you think we need to link to a disambig page ([[fusion protein (disambiguation)]]) from the main [[fusion protein]] page, we could do that. I guess I'm just more of a lumper than a splitter, but I'd rather have one solid page that is intuitive to link to than a list of hard-to-find stubs, some discussing closely related concepts, and others discussing concepts which are completely different. The page [[chimera (protein)]] (which I only just noticed) should probably be merged with the common [[fusion protein]] page. -[[User:Rustavo|Rustavo]]<sup>[[User_talk:Rustavo|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Rustavo|Contribs]]</sup> 04:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
525362 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525359 +++$+++ 525361 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.182457260E09 +++$+++ If you're confident that you can combine the first two topics in a manner that makes the distinctions clear, then I have no objection to the merge. -- +++$+++ :::If you're confident that you can combine the first two topics in a manner that makes the distinctions clear, then I have no objection to the merge. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 13:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

1072 +++$+++ FairuseBot +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-20 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.221906480E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. -- +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. --[[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]] ([[User talk:FairuseBot|talk]]) 03:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
1073 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1072 +++$+++ 1072 +++$+++ 2008-09-20 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.221955620E09 +++$+++ Resolved.  +++$+++ :Resolved. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 17:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

1074 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-22 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.222067400E09 +++$+++ Please get one as soon as possible. Hopefully a [[WP:RS]] will appear within five days.  +++$+++ Please get one as soon as possible. Hopefully a [[WP:RS]] will appear within five days. [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 00:10, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
1075 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1074 +++$+++ 1074 +++$+++ 2008-09-22 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.222076580E09 +++$+++ Thank you for adding the sources! I added some more articles to the Frankfurt WikiProject. :)  +++$+++ * Thank you for adding the sources! I added some more articles to the Frankfurt WikiProject. :) [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 02:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

525363 +++$+++ K.murphy +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525363 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-21 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.182465060E09 +++$+++ Hi, when you get time could you add an info box to the [[HB-EGF]] article I just created, like you did for [[RET proto-oncogene]]. I'll expand HB-EGF some more when I get a chance cheers  +++$+++ Hi, when you get time could you add an info box to the [[HB-EGF]] article I just created, like you did for [[RET proto-oncogene]]. I'll expand HB-EGF some more when I get a chance cheers [[User:K.murphy|K.murphy]] 15:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
525364 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525363 +++$+++ 525363 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.182472680E09 +++$+++ Done. Thanks for creating the article. -- +++$+++ :Done. Thanks for creating the article. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 17:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
525365 +++$+++ K.murphy +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525363 +++$+++ 525364 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.182480360E09 +++$+++ Nice one  +++$+++ ::Nice one [[User:K.murphy|K.murphy]] 19:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

1076 +++$+++ Jure Grm +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1076 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-24 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.222282200E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Jure Grm|Jure Grm]] ([[User talk:Jure Grm|talk]]) 11:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
1077 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1076 +++$+++ 1076 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.222285980E09 +++$+++ The modern game of [[football]] has a well established history. That includes an awareness of a number of other games played by other peoples in earlier times. In the context of an article on the Croatian national side, the reference to the Delmatas' game is silly and out of place. The Wikipedia article should be encyclopedic, it is not supposed to be some sort of fan page. The article has been through a couple of FAC's now, and although it has been improved hugely, one of the key problems with the thing has been the use of peacock langauage and a clearly nationalistic POV. Get over yourselves and write something that anyone, including a non-Croat, can take seriously.  +++$+++ :The modern game of [[football]] has a well established history. That includes an awareness of a number of other games played by other peoples in earlier times. In the context of an article on the Croatian national side, the reference to the Delmatas' game is silly and out of place. The Wikipedia article should be encyclopedic, it is not supposed to be some sort of fan page. The article has been through a couple of FAC's now, and although it has been improved hugely, one of the key problems with the thing has been the use of peacock langauage and a clearly nationalistic POV. Get over yourselves and write something that anyone, including a non-Croat, can take seriously. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 12:53, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
1078 +++$+++ Timbouctou +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1076 +++$+++ 1077 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.222291980E09 +++$+++ I'd just like to say I agree completely. User Domy started upgrading the article on the national team some time ago, and - although considerable improvements have been made to it, he just keeps adding nonsensical and POV information to the article. I stopped editing the article when i realised the flood of nonsense is unlikely to stop (what bothers me mostly is the pretty distorted way the Yugoslavian period and the WW2 are depicted, but i decided it just wasn't worth it wasting time endlessly reverting and discussing it). As for the \"Croats invented football\" article, let me just say this: I'm Croatian, born and raised in Zagreb, a football fan and I work at Reuters as an intern. Javno.com is NOT a reliable source, it is rarely, if ever, used as a source in other Croatian media; the article itself is based on a Croatian historian's unpublished book (meaning the claims from the book are unconfirmed and never went through any peer review process), which also puts a considerable dent in javno.com's credibility as a media outlet; lastly - the article was never carried by Reuters and Reuters has got nothing to do with it - Reuters only provided the accompanying photo of a Croatia fan that editors at javno.com used to illustrate the article. Best regards :-)  +++$+++ ::I'd just like to say I agree completely. User Domy started upgrading the article on the national team some time ago, and - although considerable improvements have been made to it, he just keeps adding nonsensical and POV information to the article. I stopped editing the article when i realised the flood of nonsense is unlikely to stop (what bothers me mostly is the pretty distorted way the Yugoslavian period and the WW2 are depicted, but i decided it just wasn't worth it wasting time endlessly reverting and discussing it). As for the "Croats invented football" article, let me just say this: I'm Croatian, born and raised in Zagreb, a football fan and I work at Reuters as an intern. Javno.com is NOT a reliable source, it is rarely, if ever, used as a source in other Croatian media; the article itself is based on a Croatian historian's unpublished book (meaning the claims from the book are unconfirmed and never went through any peer review process), which also puts a considerable dent in javno.com's credibility as a media outlet; lastly - the article was never carried by Reuters and Reuters has got nothing to do with it - Reuters only provided the accompanying photo of a Croatia fan that editors at javno.com used to illustrate the article. Best regards :-) [[User:Timbouctou|Timbouctou]] ([[User talk:Timbouctou|talk]]) 14:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
1079 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1076 +++$+++ 1078 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.222293540E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm just hopeful that everybody comes to their senses and realizes that those sort of claims do not add anything positive. You can lead the parade of sane people. You still living in Croatia?  +++$+++ :::Well, I'm just hopeful that everybody comes to their senses and realizes that those sort of claims do not add anything positive. You can lead the parade of sane people. You still living in Croatia? [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 14:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
1080 +++$+++ Timbouctou +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1076 +++$+++ 1079 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.222294860E09 +++$+++ Yeah, still living in Zagreb, finishing my studies, catching games at Maksimir every now and then and working part-time. How's Toronto FC doing? :-)   +++$+++ ::::Yeah, still living in Zagreb, finishing my studies, catching games at Maksimir every now and then and working part-time. How's Toronto FC doing? :-)  [[User:Timbouctou|Timbouctou]] ([[User talk:Timbouctou|talk]]) 15:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
1081 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1076 +++$+++ 1080 +++$+++ 2008-09-25 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.222364280E09 +++$+++ Toronto FC got off to a great start this season, but has since completely tanked it. They are in last place, six points out of a playoff sport with five games to go. However, they are still fun to watch, and they are much improved over last season. Fan support for the club is quite strong and it can be hard to get a ticket for a match. But, for the most part, I'm still satisfying my football appetite by watching Bundesliga matches on satellite TV on the weekend. Hockey season is about to start and it looks like the Leafs are going to be awful and miss the playoffs again. Good luck with your studies, catch you later.  +++$+++ :::::Toronto FC got off to a great start this season, but has since completely tanked it. They are in last place, six points out of a playoff sport with five games to go. However, they are still fun to watch, and they are much improved over last season. Fan support for the club is quite strong and it can be hard to get a ticket for a match. But, for the most part, I'm still satisfying my football appetite by watching Bundesliga matches on satellite TV on the weekend. Hockey season is about to start and it looks like the Leafs are going to be awful and miss the playoffs again. Good luck with your studies, catch you later. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 10:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
1082 +++$+++ Timbouctou +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1076 +++$+++ 1081 +++$+++ 2008-09-26 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.222455360E09 +++$+++ Just out of curiosity - what would you say is the average attendance at Toronto F.C. games?  +++$+++ ::::::Just out of curiosity - what would you say is the average attendance at Toronto F.C. games? [[User:Timbouctou|Timbouctou]] ([[User talk:Timbouctou|talk]]) 11:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
1083 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1076 +++$+++ 1082 +++$+++ 2008-09-26 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.222462560E09 +++$+++ Weltfussball.de claims around 20,000 in the 13 matches of 2008 [http:\/\/www.weltfussball.de\/zuschauer\/usa-major-league-soccer-2008\/1\/ here].  +++$+++ :::::::Weltfussball.de claims around 20,000 in the 13 matches of 2008 [http://www.weltfussball.de/zuschauer/usa-major-league-soccer-2008/1/ here]. [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 13:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

263222 +++$+++ Who +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-19 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.121758800E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm rather confused on your comment on my RFA.  I only started one TFD, and recommended to the community that the 3 templates be combined.  After the Tfd was closed, I followed the consensus and started removing the template and categorizing.  I am not really sure what you mean otherwise.  Thanks.  <font color=#FF0033>[[Special:Contributions\/Who|&infin;]]<\/font> +++$+++ Hi, I'm rather confused on your comment on my RFA.  I only started one TFD, and recommended to the community that the 3 templates be combined.  After the Tfd was closed, I followed the consensus and started removing the template and categorizing.  I am not really sure what you mean otherwise.  Thanks.  <font color=#FF0033>[[Special:Contributions/Who|&infin;]]</font>[[User:Who|Who]][[User talk:Who|<font color=#00Ff00>?</font><font color=#FF00FF>&iquest;</font><font color=#0033FF>?</font>]] 00:40, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
263223 +++$+++ Who +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263222 +++$+++ 263222 +++$+++ 2005-07-19 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.121758980E09 +++$+++ Hi, me again. Here is the link to the [[Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Holding_Cell|TFD holding cell]]. The directors templates are listed there for categorization. I was just doing maintenance.  <font color=#FF0033>[[Special:Contributions\/Who|&infin;]]<\/font> +++$+++ *Hi, me again. Here is the link to the [[Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Holding_Cell|TFD holding cell]]. The directors templates are listed there for categorization. I was just doing maintenance.  <font color=#FF0033>[[Special:Contributions/Who|&infin;]]</font>[[User:Who|Who]][[User talk:Who|<font color=#00Ff00>?</font><font color=#FF00FF>&iquest;</font><font color=#0033FF>?</font>]] 00:43, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
263224 +++$+++ Who +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263222 +++$+++ 263223 +++$+++ 2005-07-19 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.121763120E09 +++$+++ I see where your concern stems, the actual discussion itself, was not \"closed\" with code. I skip directly to the holding cell, to see what maintenance needs to be performed.  The directors templates were placed there [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion&diff=prev&oldid=19079646 10:06, 18 July 2005], and the discussion should have been \"closed\" at that time.  I have no bias towards the actual templates, and was merely performing required maintenance.  I have since added a \"Disputed\" section in the holding cell, until the discussion is \"closed\". As the actual discussion was over on the 17th.  If I had known it wasn't \"closed\", I would have not started maintenance.  I replied to your comments on Tfd and on my RFA.  Thank you for your understanding.  <font color=#FF0033>[[Special:Contributions\/Who|&infin;]]<\/font> +++$+++ **I see where your concern stems, the actual discussion itself, was not "closed" with code. I skip directly to the holding cell, to see what maintenance needs to be performed.  The directors templates were placed there [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion&diff=prev&oldid=19079646 10:06, 18 July 2005], and the discussion should have been "closed" at that time.  I have no bias towards the actual templates, and was merely performing required maintenance.  I have since added a "Disputed" section in the holding cell, until the discussion is "closed". As the actual discussion was over on the 17th.  If I had known it wasn't "closed", I would have not started maintenance.  I replied to your comments on Tfd and on my RFA.  Thank you for your understanding.  <font color=#FF0033>[[Special:Contributions/Who|&infin;]]</font>[[User:Who|Who]][[User talk:Who|<font color=#00Ff00>?</font><font color=#FF00FF>&iquest;</font><font color=#0033FF>?</font>]] 01:52, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
263225 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263222 +++$+++ 263222 +++$+++ 2005-07-19 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.121784240E09 +++$+++ Hello. I would like to comment on this... I closed that TFD vote, simply because it had been listed for seven days. I'm the present cleaner-upper for TFD (for no particular reason other than having enough free time for it) and I close all discussions after seven days, which is the required period. So I would state that Who is acting in good faith here. As am I, but if you think something else should be done with the TFD I'd be happy to discuss it.  +++$+++ *Hello. I would like to comment on this... I closed that TFD vote, simply because it had been listed for seven days. I'm the present cleaner-upper for TFD (for no particular reason other than having enough free time for it) and I close all discussions after seven days, which is the required period. So I would state that Who is acting in good faith here. As am I, but if you think something else should be done with the TFD I'd be happy to discuss it. [[User:Radiant!|R]][[User_talk:Radiant!|adiant]][[meta:mergist|_<font color="orange">&gt;|&lt;</font>]] 07:44, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
263226 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263222 +++$+++ 263225 +++$+++ 2005-07-19 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.121784600E09 +++$+++ Investigating further, I notice that I did list the templates under the 'deprecate' section, and put the discussion in the log folder, but I omitted removing the discussion from the TFD main page. My mistake, I've fixed it now.  +++$+++ **Investigating further, I notice that I did list the templates under the 'deprecate' section, and put the discussion in the log folder, but I omitted removing the discussion from the TFD main page. My mistake, I've fixed it now. [[User:Radiant!|R]][[User_talk:Radiant!|adiant]][[meta:mergist|_<font color="orange">&gt;|&lt;</font>]] 07:50, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
263227 +++$+++ Who +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263222 +++$+++ 263222 +++$+++ 2005-07-21 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.121937840E09 +++$+++ Hi, I appologize for bothering you with this again, I assume you have just been busy, or otherwise.  I know I sent quite a few messages up above concerning what you thought were bad faith and misguided removals of the template. I was just wondering if you have had a chance to take a look at what happened. I only ask because you did make specific comments about it, and I wanted a chance to hear from you after my responses.  If you choose not to change your vote on my RFA, that is quite ok too, only ask that you consider ammending the reason for oppose.  Thank you for your understanding.  <font color=#FF0033>[[Special:Contributions\/Who|&infin;]]<\/font> +++$+++ *Hi, I appologize for bothering you with this again, I assume you have just been busy, or otherwise.  I know I sent quite a few messages up above concerning what you thought were bad faith and misguided removals of the template. I was just wondering if you have had a chance to take a look at what happened. I only ask because you did make specific comments about it, and I wanted a chance to hear from you after my responses.  If you choose not to change your vote on my RFA, that is quite ok too, only ask that you consider ammending the reason for oppose.  Thank you for your understanding.  <font color=#FF0033>[[Special:Contributions/Who|&infin;]]</font>[[User:Who|Who]][[User talk:Who|<font color=#00Ff00>?</font><font color=#FF00FF>&iquest;</font><font color=#0033FF>?</font>]] 02:24, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
263228 +++$+++ Who +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263222 +++$+++ 263222 +++$+++ 2005-07-22 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.122083280E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for striking those comments.  I went ahead and nominated {{tl|Quentin Tarantino films}}, thanks for letting me know about it. That was a little incomplete anyways.  Salut. <font color=#FF0033>[[Special:Contributions\/Who|&infin;]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Hi, thanks for striking those comments.  I went ahead and nominated {{tl|Quentin Tarantino films}}, thanks for letting me know about it. That was a little incomplete anyways.  Salut. <font color=#FF0033>[[Special:Contributions/Who|&infin;]]</font>[[User:Who|Who]][[User talk:Who|<font color=#00Ff00>?</font><font color=#FF00FF>&iquest;</font><font color=#0033FF>?</font>]] 18:48, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
263229 +++$+++ Who +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263222 +++$+++ 263228 +++$+++ 2005-07-22 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.122097380E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for the heads up on {{tl|Stanley Kubrick}}, its gone now.  Thanks again.  <font color=#FF0033>[[Special:Contributions\/Who|&infin;]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::Hi, thanks for the heads up on {{tl|Stanley Kubrick}}, its gone now.  Thanks again.  <font color=#FF0033>[[Special:Contributions/Who|&infin;]]</font>[[User:Who|Who]][[User talk:Who|<font color=#00Ff00>?</font><font color=#FF00FF>&iquest;</font><font color=#0033FF>?</font>]] 22:43, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

525367 +++$+++ Engusz +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-26 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.182845100E09 +++$+++ Hi! Can you tell me how does it looks like in latin? I can't find it anywhere and i don't learn latin. Thank you-- +++$+++ Hi! Can you tell me how does it looks like in latin? I can't find it anywhere and i don't learn latin. Thank you--[[User:Engusz|Engusz]] 01:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
525368 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525367 +++$+++ 525367 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.183535880E09 +++$+++ The TA is ''processus ethmoidalis conchae nasalis inferioris''. I've added an article and illustration at [[ethmoidal process of inferior nasal concha]] to clarify. -- +++$+++ :The TA is ''processus ethmoidalis conchae nasalis inferioris''. I've added an article and illustration at [[ethmoidal process of inferior nasal concha]] to clarify. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 00:58, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

524468 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-04 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.191533820E09 +++$+++ Sorry to bother you, but an expert, and neutral, opinion is needed in the in the Alice Bailey article [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Alice_Bailey], for the disagreement under \"Revisiting Policies\" heading (near the bottom of the talk page). It is my view that Jamesd1 has in the article made sweeping statements about the many Bailey quotes, and those sweeping statements are his own reading of what he ''thinks'' they mean. To me that amounts to original research and non-neutral point of view. (If it is not, why did I get such a hard time over the writing of criticism section, in which my own reading of Bailey's comments were rejected on those same grounds?) Thanks.  +++$+++ Sorry to bother you, but an expert, and neutral, opinion is needed in the in the Alice Bailey article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alice_Bailey], for the disagreement under "Revisiting Policies" heading (near the bottom of the talk page). It is my view that Jamesd1 has in the article made sweeping statements about the many Bailey quotes, and those sweeping statements are his own reading of what he ''thinks'' they mean. To me that amounts to original research and non-neutral point of view. (If it is not, why did I get such a hard time over the writing of criticism section, in which my own reading of Bailey's comments were rejected on those same grounds?) Thanks. [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 14:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
524469 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524468 +++$+++ 524468 +++$+++ 2007-10-04 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.191533880E09 +++$+++ I was just thinking this very morning - wow, nothing heard from Alice Bailey in quite some time, maybe they've reached some kind of stability? Ah, well. Will look... -- +++$+++ : I was just thinking this very morning - wow, nothing heard from Alice Bailey in quite some time, maybe they've reached some kind of stability? Ah, well. Will look... --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

525370 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-26 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.182908220E09 +++$+++ I hate categorizing and I'm guessing you know which would be most appropriate for [[Degenerative disc disease|this]] article.  Would you mind?   +++$+++ I hate categorizing and I'm guessing you know which would be most appropriate for [[Degenerative disc disease|this]] article.  Would you mind?  [[User:WLU|WLU]] 18:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
525371 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525370 +++$+++ 525370 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.182921480E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure about a category, but I've added an infobox and navbox which should help show where it fits in. -- +++$+++ :I'm not sure about a category, but I've added an infobox and navbox which should help show where it fits in. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

568159 +++$+++ Dlyons493 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-07 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.141786380E09 +++$+++ Hi, Glad to see you made it (even though I voted against, somewhat reluctantly).  Good luck, I have no doubt you'll be an excellent admin.   +++$+++ Hi, Glad to see you made it (even though I voted against, somewhat reluctantly).  Good luck, I have no doubt you'll be an excellent admin.  [[User:Dlyons493|<FONT COLOR="#00FF00">Dl</FONT><FONT COLOR="#44FF00">yo</FONT><FONT COLOR="#99DD11">ns</FONT><FONT COLOR="#DDDD11">493</FONT>]] [[User_talk:Dlyons493|<FONT COLOR="#DDDD11">Ta</FONT><FONT COLOR="#00FF00">lk</FONT>]]  18:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
568160 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568159 +++$+++ 568159 +++$+++ 2006-03-08 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.141807200E09 +++$+++ Congrats from me, too - and good luck! If you need a hand with your [[mop|admin powers]] feel free to drop me a line.  +++$+++ :Congrats from me, too - and good luck! If you need a hand with your [[mop|admin powers]] feel free to drop me a line. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:40, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
568161 +++$+++ Jusjih +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568159 +++$+++ 568160 +++$+++ 2006-03-08 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.141809120E09 +++$+++ Best wish for your adminship.-- +++$+++ ::Best wish for your adminship.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 01:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
568162 +++$+++ Gflores +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568159 +++$+++ 568161 +++$+++ 2006-03-08 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.141818300E09 +++$+++ Congrats!  +++$+++ :::Congrats! [[User:Gflores|Gflores]] <sup>[[User Talk:Gflores|Talk]]</sup> 03:45, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
568163 +++$+++ Kingboyk +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568159 +++$+++ 568162 +++$+++ 2006-03-08 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.141824300E09 +++$+++ Likewise! -- +++$+++ ::::Likewise! --[[User:Kingboyk|kingboyk]] 05:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
568164 +++$+++  +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568159 +++$+++ 568159 +++$+++ 2006-03-08 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.141843080E09 +++$+++ Many congratulations. I would congratulate you myself, but I've busted my monobook.js and need to wait another 3 days before I can un-bust it as my debug username, as it's semi-protected and the debugger is a \"new\" user. Anyhow, you'll do great! See you around.  +++$+++ :Many congratulations. I would congratulate you myself, but I've busted my monobook.js and need to wait another 3 days before I can un-bust it as my debug username, as it's semi-protected and the debugger is a "new" user. Anyhow, you'll do great! See you around. [[User:Haza-w|<b><font face="Verdana" color="#FF0000">haz</font></b>]]&nbsp;<sub>([[User_talk:Haza-w|user&nbsp;talk]])</sub><sup>[[WP:ESP|'''<font color="#00FF00">e</font>''']]</sup> 10:38, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

1085 +++$+++ FairuseBot +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1085 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-02 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.222947480E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. -- +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. --[[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]] ([[User talk:FairuseBot|talk]]) 04:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
1086 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1085 +++$+++ 1085 +++$+++ 2008-10-03 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.223094420E09 +++$+++ Resolved.  +++$+++ *Resolved. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 21:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

263231 +++$+++ Cashandhoes +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263231 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-02 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.123043040E09 +++$+++ You accused user 80.7.118.138 of being insecure and telling him \"You Need Help\". Wikipedia has a strict '''No Personal Attacks''' rule. Even if he has said something bad about your university etc you should not retailate in that way.  +++$+++ You accused user 80.7.118.138 of being insecure and telling him "You Need Help". Wikipedia has a strict '''No Personal Attacks''' rule. Even if he has said something bad about your university etc you should not retailate in that way. [[User:Cashandhoes|Cashandhoes]] 21:24, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
263232 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263231 +++$+++ 263231 +++$+++ 2005-08-02 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.123043220E09 +++$+++ Swings and roundabouts considering the accusations he\/she has levied. No apology whatsoever.  +++$+++ :Swings and roundabouts considering the accusations he/she has levied. No apology whatsoever. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 21:27, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
263233 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263231 +++$+++ 263231 +++$+++ 2005-08-02 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.123044000E09 +++$+++ Additionally, the user used information from my personal website to construct a personal attack against me (2 August, 21:24, NTL Internet, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom). The user needs to grow up and sort themselves out.   +++$+++ :Additionally, the user used information from my personal website to construct a personal attack against me (2 August, 21:24, NTL Internet, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom). The user needs to grow up and sort themselves out.  [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 21:40, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

525378 +++$+++ Biophys +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.183535040E09 +++$+++ Hello Arcadian, it is a pleasure to see your outstanding work with so many articles. I just would like to note that proteins like [[Aquaporin 1]] can be classified simply as \"Transmembrane protein\". There is no need to also include a category \"Membrane biology\", because all \"TM proteins\" belong to \"Membrane proteins\" who belong to \"Membrane biology\" anyway. The double classification seems to be redundant. +++$+++ Hello Arcadian, it is a pleasure to see your outstanding work with so many articles. I just would like to note that proteins like [[Aquaporin 1]] can be classified simply as "Transmembrane protein". There is no need to also include a category "Membrane biology", because all "TM proteins" belong to "Membrane proteins" who belong to "Membrane biology" anyway. The double classification seems to be redundant.[[User:Biophys|Biophys]] 00:44, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
525379 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525378 +++$+++ 525378 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.183535220E09 +++$+++ I agree, and have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Aquaporin_1&diff=142356617&oldid=119524080 removed] the redundant category. Thanks for the heads-up. -- +++$+++ : I agree, and have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aquaporin_1&diff=142356617&oldid=119524080 removed] the redundant category. Thanks for the heads-up. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 00:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

1091 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-05 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.223213400E09 +++$+++ Hey Wiggy!, sorry to have been so quiet lately, but my holidays and then work kept me busy. I'm just wondering whether you got any information on this club in your amazing book: [[BSC Erlangen]] (formerly: ''SpVgg B\xfcchenbach''). I can't find anything from before 1957. Even a foundation year would already make quite a difference! Thanks, all the best,  +++$+++ Hey Wiggy!, sorry to have been so quiet lately, but my holidays and then work kept me busy. I'm just wondering whether you got any information on this club in your amazing book: [[BSC Erlangen]] (formerly: ''SpVgg Büchenbach''). I can't find anything from before 1957. Even a foundation year would already make quite a difference! Thanks, all the best, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 06:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
1092 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1091 +++$+++ 1091 +++$+++ 2008-10-05 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.223218980E09 +++$+++ That's all there is and it looks like you've already captured most of it! Good job, sorry I couldn't provide anything else.  +++$+++ :That's all there is and it looks like you've already captured most of it! Good job, sorry I couldn't provide anything else. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 08:03, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
1093 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1091 +++$+++ 1092 +++$+++ 2008-10-05 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.223219940E09 +++$+++ Oh well, seems the past of this club will remain a mistery, at least for the time. SpVgg Erlangen is not related to SpVgg B\xfcchenbach to my knowledge and the current SpVgg B\xfcchenbach from 1968 is actually spelled SpVgg Buchenbach and based in the Black Forrest. Took me a bit to figure then one out, no relation there either. Regarding the holiday, it was great but went all to fast. Have fun, enjoy yourself,  +++$+++ ::Oh well, seems the past of this club will remain a mistery, at least for the time. SpVgg Erlangen is not related to SpVgg Büchenbach to my knowledge and the current SpVgg Büchenbach from 1968 is actually spelled SpVgg Buchenbach and based in the Black Forrest. Took me a bit to figure then one out, no relation there either. Regarding the holiday, it was great but went all to fast. Have fun, enjoy yourself, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 08:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

525380 +++$+++ Una Smith +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525380 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-10 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.184062620E09 +++$+++ Arcadian, are you converting inline citations by hand?  If not, what is your trick?  -- +++$+++ Arcadian, are you converting inline citations by hand?  If not, what is your trick?  --[[User:Una Smith|Una Smith]] 03:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
525381 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525380 +++$+++ 525380 +++$+++ 2007-07-10 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.184063880E09 +++$+++ I'm guessing that [http:\/\/diberri.dyndns.org\/wikipedia\/templates\/?type=pubmed this] is what you're looking for -- select \"PubMed ID\" from the picklist, then type in a PMID and click \"Submit\", and you get a formatted string you can paste into the article. -- +++$+++ : I'm guessing that [http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/templates/?type=pubmed this] is what you're looking for -- select "PubMed ID" from the picklist, then type in a PMID and click "Submit", and you get a formatted string you can paste into the article. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 03:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
525382 +++$+++ Una Smith +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525380 +++$+++ 525381 +++$+++ 2007-07-10 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.184065920E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's it. -- +++$+++ ::Yes, that's it. --[[User:Una Smith|Una Smith]] 04:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
525383 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525380 +++$+++ 525382 +++$+++ 2007-07-10 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.184065980E09 +++$+++ Happy to help. Keep up the good work. -- +++$+++ :::Happy to help. Keep up the good work. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 04:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

524470 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-04 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.191553200E09 +++$+++ Hi, AnonEMouse. ''[[Mainichi Shimbun]]'', a great source for many articles I've worked on, to which I've linked on dozens of articles, has recently changed their site format. Now none of those old links work... Needless to say, this royally screws up a lot of article sourcing. But wait, it gets better! I can't locate the old articles either through searching archives at the site, or through Google searches (which locate the old link, but turn up the new front page). The Google caches are still there, for now, and I do have copies of the articles all saved... [[Internet Archive]] is turning up some of the articles... My question: In reparing this royal screw-up, is there an easier alternative to searching the Internet Archive, hoping it's there, and re-doing all the links? <small>(Please, please, please say yes!)<\/small> And if not, would it be sensible to make a practise of automatically including a link to an archived copy of every link to prepare against such site \"improvements\" in the future?  +++$+++ Hi, AnonEMouse. ''[[Mainichi Shimbun]]'', a great source for many articles I've worked on, to which I've linked on dozens of articles, has recently changed their site format. Now none of those old links work... Needless to say, this royally screws up a lot of article sourcing. But wait, it gets better! I can't locate the old articles either through searching archives at the site, or through Google searches (which locate the old link, but turn up the new front page). The Google caches are still there, for now, and I do have copies of the articles all saved... [[Internet Archive]] is turning up some of the articles... My question: In reparing this royal screw-up, is there an easier alternative to searching the Internet Archive, hoping it's there, and re-doing all the links? <small>(Please, please, please say yes!)</small> And if not, would it be sensible to make a practise of automatically including a link to an archived copy of every link to prepare against such site "improvements" in the future? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 20:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
524471 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524470 +++$+++ 524470 +++$+++ 2007-10-04 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.191553740E09 +++$+++ I personally have used the Internet Archive for such things. However [[Web archiving]] lists several others. One I've always wanted to try \"when I get a round to it\" has been [[WebCite]], which apparently will archive any link for you when you ask them to. Or at least will for academic sources; and I think Wikipedia can try to be called that. :-). Unfortunately it requires being proactive, and asking them to archive the page ''before'' it vanishes, not after. Something about barn doors and horses... :-( If you try any of those, please tell me how they have worked for you. The good news is that the ''Mainichi Shimbun'' is a print newspaper, so if you cited the date the article appeared in print, the reference is still valid even if you can't find it on the Web. But of course it is much more convenient for everyone if you do have a link. -- +++$+++ : I personally have used the Internet Archive for such things. However [[Web archiving]] lists several others. One I've always wanted to try "when I get a round to it" has been [[WebCite]], which apparently will archive any link for you when you ask them to. Or at least will for academic sources; and I think Wikipedia can try to be called that. :-). Unfortunately it requires being proactive, and asking them to archive the page ''before'' it vanishes, not after. Something about barn doors and horses... :-( If you try any of those, please tell me how they have worked for you. The good news is that the ''Mainichi Shimbun'' is a print newspaper, so if you cited the date the article appeared in print, the reference is still valid even if you can't find it on the Web. But of course it is much more convenient for everyone if you do have a link. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 20:09, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
524472 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524470 +++$+++ 524471 +++$+++ 2007-10-04 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.191554760E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Anon. That'll help. Internet Archive is so slow to search\/open for some reason, and it's not showing all the articles... Live and learn, I guess.  +++$+++ :: Thanks, Anon. That'll help. Internet Archive is so slow to search/open for some reason, and it's not showing all the articles... Live and learn, I guess. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 20:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

437089 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437089 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-27 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.130433720E09 +++$+++ I need your informed opinion regarding [[Endemic birds of Hawaii]].  I can't decide whether to continue working in table format and adding data, or keeping it simple with just a numbered list and brief entries.  I welcome any advice you might have for how to approach this page. -- +++$+++ I need your informed opinion regarding [[Endemic birds of Hawaii]].  I can't decide whether to continue working in table format and adding data, or keeping it simple with just a numbered list and brief entries.  I welcome any advice you might have for how to approach this page. --[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas ]] | [[User_talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 10:22, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
437090 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437089 +++$+++ 437089 +++$+++ 2005-10-27 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.130458860E09 +++$+++ I would think eventually someone would want to write an article detailing the story of especially the endemic forest birds.  The article should eventually go in that direction. As to adding data, I presume you mean bits about each species?  Again, that should probably move towards individual articles on each species; but I realize that for most that will not likely happen (would remain stubs).  My preference would be to keep the table simple and direct, and start a subsection on each species (or other grouping in the beginning) that could spin off as they fill up. I prefer text and text with pictures over too detailed a table (but simple table is good)! -  +++$+++ :I would think eventually someone would want to write an article detailing the story of especially the endemic forest birds.  The article should eventually go in that direction. As to adding data, I presume you mean bits about each species?  Again, that should probably move towards individual articles on each species; but I realize that for most that will not likely happen (would remain stubs).  My preference would be to keep the table simple and direct, and start a subsection on each species (or other grouping in the beginning) that could spin off as they fill up. I prefer text and text with pictures over too detailed a table (but simple table is good)! - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 17:21, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
437091 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437089 +++$+++ 437090 +++$+++ 2005-10-28 10:15:00 +++$+++ 1.130519700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your input.  I agree that I should stick with simple text and avoid using a table at this time. When I have some more time I'll make the change; perhaps you can review it if it's on your watchlist.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks for your input.  I agree that I should stick with simple text and avoid using a table at this time. When I have some more time I'll make the change; perhaps you can review it if it's on your watchlist.--[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas ]] | [[User_talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 10:15, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
437092 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437089 +++$+++ 437091 +++$+++ 2005-10-28 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.130547600E09 +++$+++ I think the table is fine.  I would just not try and put too much informatiion in it.  It is harder for others to edit if the table is the main thing in the article.  But as a form of list, I don't object to using tables -  +++$+++ :::I think the table is fine.  I would just not try and put too much informatiion in it.  It is harder for others to edit if the table is the main thing in the article.  But as a form of list, I don't object to using tables - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 18:00, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
437093 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437089 +++$+++ 437092 +++$+++ 2005-10-29 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.130646900E09 +++$+++ Ok, but it's going to have ~70 entries using the current format.  I'll add some more and see what you think.  After experimenting, I think this information would be more appropriate as a separate [[List of endemic birds of Hawaii]]. -- +++$+++ ::::Ok, but it's going to have ~70 entries using the current format.  I'll add some more and see what you think.  After experimenting, I think this information would be more appropriate as a separate [[List of endemic birds of Hawaii]]. --[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas ]] | [[User_talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 21:35, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
437094 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437089 +++$+++ 437091 +++$+++ 2005-10-31 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.130754780E09 +++$+++ You are probably right.  Real long tables are hard to deal with and near impossible to make casual edits to -  +++$+++ :::You are probably right.  Real long tables are hard to deal with and near impossible to make casual edits to - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 02:33, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

525385 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525385 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-12 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.184227440E09 +++$+++ In case it fell off your watchlist: [[Wikipedia talk:MeSH]].  +++$+++ In case it fell off your watchlist: [[Wikipedia talk:MeSH]]. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 01:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
525386 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525385 +++$+++ 525385 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.184228640E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you found it useful. Nice job creating [[central retinal vein]]. -- +++$+++ :I'm glad you found it useful. Nice job creating [[central retinal vein]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
525387 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525385 +++$+++ 525386 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.184229120E09 +++$+++ And thank ''you'' for the infobox! :-)  +++$+++ ::And thank ''you'' for the infobox! :-) [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 01:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
525388 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525385 +++$+++ 525387 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.184229480E09 +++$+++ Though it has left a lot of white space to fill... :-(  +++$+++ :::Though it has left a lot of white space to fill... :-( [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 01:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

1098 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-07 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.226099940E09 +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, I know you have made yourself a bit rare lately, but if you could spare a little time, could you help me out? I'm trying to find a logo for [[ASV Herzogenaurach]] but havn't got much luck. The clubs website got it but I'm not skilled enough to retrieve it. I tried a few other of my usual sources but failed, too. Any idea where I could get one? Have fun, hope to see you back in action soon, so many club articles still to write, going to sleep now,  +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, I know you have made yourself a bit rare lately, but if you could spare a little time, could you help me out? I'm trying to find a logo for [[ASV Herzogenaurach]] but havn't got much luck. The clubs website got it but I'm not skilled enough to retrieve it. I tried a few other of my usual sources but failed, too. Any idea where I could get one? Have fun, hope to see you back in action soon, so many club articles still to write, going to sleep now, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 15:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
1099 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1098 +++$+++ 1098 +++$+++ 2008-11-07 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.226116740E09 +++$+++ Life sometimes gets in the way of one's fun. <sigh> I'll be back at it soon enough as I'm headed into my quiet season at work. The requested logo has been rendered and posted! Thanks for the ask.  +++$+++ :Life sometimes gets in the way of one's fun. <sigh> I'll be back at it soon enough as I'm headed into my quiet season at work. The requested logo has been rendered and posted! Thanks for the ask. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 19:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
1100 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1098 +++$+++ 1099 +++$+++ 2008-11-07 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.226128680E09 +++$+++ Many thanks, a logo makes so much difference to an article!  +++$+++ ::Many thanks, a logo makes so much difference to an article! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 23:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

525389 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-12 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.184229600E09 +++$+++ PS. Any pics or infoboxes for [[bulbar sheath]]? :-)  +++$+++ PS. Any pics or infoboxes for [[bulbar sheath]]? :-) [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 01:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
525390 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525389 +++$+++ 525389 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.184229900E09 +++$+++ Funny you should mention that. We now have articles for [[bulbar sheath]], [[Tenon's capsule]], and [[Capsule of T\xe9non]], which are [http:\/\/www.mercksource.com\/pp\/us\/cns\/cns_hl_dorlands.jspzQzpgzEzzSzppdocszSzuszSzcommonzSzdorlandszSzdorlandzSzdmd_v_01zPzhtm#12842547 all the same thing]. I put up a merge notice a month ago, and received no objection, so you might want to take the best bits of all three and roll them into a single article. -- +++$+++ :Funny you should mention that. We now have articles for [[bulbar sheath]], [[Tenon's capsule]], and [[Capsule of Ténon]], which are [http://www.mercksource.com/pp/us/cns/cns_hl_dorlands.jspzQzpgzEzzSzppdocszSzuszSzcommonzSzdorlandszSzdorlandzSzdmd_v_01zPzhtm#12842547 all the same thing]. I put up a merge notice a month ago, and received no objection, so you might want to take the best bits of all three and roll them into a single article. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
525391 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525389 +++$+++ 525390 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.184230380E09 +++$+++ I took a closer look at what you wrote, and it appears that although Dorland's equates all three terms, you're stating that the first two are different from each other. I'm guessing that you probably have a source for that, since you were so careful about sourcing [[central retinal vein]]. Whatever direction you go, Gray891.png is a good image to use (it is labeled in that image as \"fascia bulbi\".) -- +++$+++ ::I took a closer look at what you wrote, and it appears that although Dorland's equates all three terms, you're stating that the first two are different from each other. I'm guessing that you probably have a source for that, since you were so careful about sourcing [[central retinal vein]]. Whatever direction you go, Gray891.png is a good image to use (it is labeled in that image as "fascia bulbi".) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
525392 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525389 +++$+++ 525391 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.184231040E09 +++$+++ Oops. You caught me out there! I just rewrote the definition [http:\/\/www.tedmontgomery.com\/the_eye\/glossary\/B.html here], and on closer inspection, I see that all those terms are indeed referring to the same thing. I'll redirect to [[Capsule of T\xe9non]], which looks like the best one.  +++$+++ :::Oops. You caught me out there! I just rewrote the definition [http://www.tedmontgomery.com/the_eye/glossary/B.html here], and on closer inspection, I see that all those terms are indeed referring to the same thing. I'll redirect to [[Capsule of Ténon]], which looks like the best one. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 02:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

1102 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-15 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.226750580E09 +++$+++ Nice work on all the logos!  +++$+++ Nice work on all the logos! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 04:03, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
1103 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1102 +++$+++ 1102 +++$+++ 2008-11-15 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.226750640E09 +++$+++ Thx. Just a little catching up.  +++$+++ :Thx. Just a little catching up. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 04:04, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

263247 +++$+++ Boothy443 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-25 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.125029040E09 +++$+++ I'll take a look and take it under consderation. -- +++$+++ I'll take a look and take it under consderation. --[[User:Boothy443|Boothy443]] | [[User talk:Boothy443|comhrÚ]] 21:04, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
263248 +++$+++ Boothy443 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263247 +++$+++ 263247 +++$+++ 2005-08-25 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.125031440E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know i am extremely relutanct in my changem, and i am still considering just pulling my vote. -- +++$+++ :Just to let you know i am extremely relutanct in my changem, and i am still considering just pulling my vote. --[[User:Boothy443|Boothy443]] | [[User talk:Boothy443|comhrÚ]] 21:44, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

525393 +++$+++ StationNT5Bmedia +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-15 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.184490960E09 +++$+++ Hi! It's been a while since the article pupilometer was written. The original user that was the author no longer exists. I don't see any references to validate the nomenclature, although there is use of it as an Ophthalmic Instrument to measure the distance between of the PD, or pupillary distance from eye to eye when fitting eyeglasses to align the optic centers of a prescription. Would you concur to changing the content of the article? I don't know what your original contribution was, but found this link to your user_talk page in the history.  +++$+++ Hi! It's been a while since the article pupilometer was written. The original user that was the author no longer exists. I don't see any references to validate the nomenclature, although there is use of it as an Ophthalmic Instrument to measure the distance between of the PD, or pupillary distance from eye to eye when fitting eyeglasses to align the optic centers of a prescription. Would you concur to changing the content of the article? I don't know what your original contribution was, but found this link to your user_talk page in the history. [[User:StationNT5Bmedia|StationNT5Bmedia]] 02:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
525394 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525393 +++$+++ 525393 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.184492520E09 +++$+++ My only contribution to [[Pupilometer]] was to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Pupilometer&diff=43386558&oldid=38425276 sort it] last year, but it certainly is in need of expansion. I've added a couple of refs, and taken a few words from your note on the talk page. But if you are knowledgeable about the subject, I'd encourage you to [[Wikipedia:Be bold|be bold]] in expanding it further.  -- +++$+++ :My only contribution to [[Pupilometer]] was to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pupilometer&diff=43386558&oldid=38425276 sort it] last year, but it certainly is in need of expansion. I've added a couple of refs, and taken a few words from your note on the talk page. But if you are knowledgeable about the subject, I'd encourage you to [[Wikipedia:Be bold|be bold]] in expanding it further.  --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 02:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

1106 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1106 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-19 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.229738520E09 +++$+++ Wiggy, regardless of what you think of those of us advocating removing the logos, it is inappropriate to refer to us as \"zealots\" as you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ANon-free_content&diff=259007599&oldid=259007293 here]. Please observe [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]]. Commenting on editors is inappropriate. Please comment on content, not on editors. Thank you, -- +++$+++ Wiggy, regardless of what you think of those of us advocating removing the logos, it is inappropriate to refer to us as "zealots" as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ANon-free_content&diff=259007599&oldid=259007293 here]. Please observe [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]]. Commenting on editors is inappropriate. Please comment on content, not on editors. Thank you, --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 18:02, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1107 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1106 +++$+++ 1106 +++$+++ 2008-12-19 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.229738760E09 +++$+++ Just calling it how it is. Send me along to AN\/I if you like and stomp your feet some more. Otherwise just let it slide and confine ''your'' comments to the debate instead of poking at other editors in an officious manner. It just puts a chill on things when people begin to feel they can't speak their minds.  +++$+++ :Just calling it how it is. Send me along to AN/I if you like and stomp your feet some more. Otherwise just let it slide and confine ''your'' comments to the debate instead of poking at other editors in an officious manner. It just puts a chill on things when people begin to feel they can't speak their minds. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 18:06, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1108 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1106 +++$+++ 1107 +++$+++ 2008-12-19 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.229739420E09 +++$+++ So if I feel that you're a <expletive> <expletive> <expletive> <expletive> <expletive> it's ok to tell you that because that's how it is? It's ok to do that because I'm just speaking my mind? I sincerely hope you don't truly believe that. -- +++$+++ :*So if I feel that you're a <expletive> <expletive> <expletive> <expletive> <expletive> it's ok to tell you that because that's how it is? It's ok to do that because I'm just speaking my mind? I sincerely hope you don't truly believe that. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 18:17, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1109 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1106 +++$+++ 1107 +++$+++ 2008-12-19 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.229740200E09 +++$+++ You can lay off such a lame and argumentative approach. I'm not granting you license to do any of that stuff, nor have any of the other editors who have challenged you to your dislike granted you any sort of license to be uncivil. The tantrum at the recently refused AN\/I was childish and this looks to be little more than an extension of that behaviour. Just take what I said at face value without extrapolating it to serve some other purpose - I don't need or appreciate anyone trying to put words in my mouth. You're welcome to go back and look at any of my posts and count all the expletives. You should find, oh ... just about none. I may speak strongly from time to time, but I don't curse folks out, throw hissy fits, or head hunt them. I genuinely believe that there is a small group of anti-image editors who are extreme in their interpretation and application of policy (overzealous maybe?) who should be challenged when they push too hard.  +++$+++ ::You can lay off such a lame and argumentative approach. I'm not granting you license to do any of that stuff, nor have any of the other editors who have challenged you to your dislike granted you any sort of license to be uncivil. The tantrum at the recently refused AN/I was childish and this looks to be little more than an extension of that behaviour. Just take what I said at face value without extrapolating it to serve some other purpose - I don't need or appreciate anyone trying to put words in my mouth. You're welcome to go back and look at any of my posts and count all the expletives. You should find, oh ... just about none. I may speak strongly from time to time, but I don't curse folks out, throw hissy fits, or head hunt them. I genuinely believe that there is a small group of anti-image editors who are extreme in their interpretation and application of policy (overzealous maybe?) who should be challenged when they push too hard. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 18:30, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1110 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1106 +++$+++ 1109 +++$+++ 2008-12-19 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.229740980E09 +++$+++ You are welcome to your beliefs. Nobody is suggesting you should give them up. That said, nobody deserves to be called a zealot, or a tantrum thrower, or anything else. [[WP:NPA]] exists for a reason, and it isn't to allow you to insult your fellow editors when you feel that is \"how it is\" or when you feel not insulting them would cause you to not \"speak [your] mind\". I'm not taking you to task over your stance with respect to fair use images. All I'm asking is for you to tone down the rhetoric you are aiming at other editors themselves, rather than their opinions or commentary. That is not an unreasonable request. Simply refraining from using profanity is not a measure of civility. Shakespeare, for example, and all manner of insulting phrases in his works without using profanity. In fact, a more learned person is quite capable of thoroughly insulting someone without ever using a single profanity. Further, using insults against someone does nothing to enhance your argument. I'm sure you can find more reasonable ways of debating a topic than having to descend to mud-slinging in some misguided attempt to prove your point. -- +++$+++ ::*You are welcome to your beliefs. Nobody is suggesting you should give them up. That said, nobody deserves to be called a zealot, or a tantrum thrower, or anything else. [[WP:NPA]] exists for a reason, and it isn't to allow you to insult your fellow editors when you feel that is "how it is" or when you feel not insulting them would cause you to not "speak [your] mind". I'm not taking you to task over your stance with respect to fair use images. All I'm asking is for you to tone down the rhetoric you are aiming at other editors themselves, rather than their opinions or commentary. That is not an unreasonable request. Simply refraining from using profanity is not a measure of civility. Shakespeare, for example, and all manner of insulting phrases in his works without using profanity. In fact, a more learned person is quite capable of thoroughly insulting someone without ever using a single profanity. Further, using insults against someone does nothing to enhance your argument. I'm sure you can find more reasonable ways of debating a topic than having to descend to mud-slinging in some misguided attempt to prove your point. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 18:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1111 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1106 +++$+++ 1109 +++$+++ 2008-12-19 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.229742060E09 +++$+++ Sorry dude, but after the display at AN\/I and in other places I just can't take the above remonstration too seriously. You may wish to try leading by example instead of haranguing other folks - I'm just not interested. And let's be clear - I have ''not'' used profanity ''anywhere'', so I don't need that lecture. Don't obfuscate.   +++$+++ :::Sorry dude, but after the display at AN/I and in other places I just can't take the above remonstration too seriously. You may wish to try leading by example instead of haranguing other folks - I'm just not interested. And let's be clear - I have ''not'' used profanity ''anywhere'', so I don't need that lecture. Don't obfuscate.  [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 19:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

525396 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525396 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-15 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.184557980E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, would you mind if I indefinitely semi-protected {{tl|ATC}}? It's currently linked to from over 200 pages, and it just struck me that, were it vandalized, there could be some serious damage.  +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, would you mind if I indefinitely semi-protected {{tl|ATC}}? It's currently linked to from over 200 pages, and it just struck me that, were it vandalized, there could be some serious damage. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 20:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
525397 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525396 +++$+++ 525396 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.184558640E09 +++$+++ No problem -- go ahead -- its not like it needs to change much in the future. -- +++$+++ :No problem -- go ahead -- its not like it needs to change much in the future. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 21:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
525398 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525396 +++$+++ 525397 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.184559660E09 +++$+++ Thanks\u2014done. Keep up the usual excellent work :)  +++$+++ ::Thanks—done. Keep up the usual excellent work :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 21:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

263254 +++$+++ rl +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-04 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.125851520E09 +++$+++ I am about to take a break, but I didn't want to leave without thanking you for your kind comments. RFA voting is one thing I abstained from after I saw good candidates publicly humiliated over trifles. I figured I could contribute to a worthy cause in other areas where I wouldn't get upset, and so I did. Now my selfish behavior has come back to bite me. Your own work on RFAs is important, and I hope you keep making WP:RFA a less hostile place. I wish you all the best, and if you ever apply for adminship yourself, do let me know.  +++$+++ I am about to take a break, but I didn't want to leave without thanking you for your kind comments. RFA voting is one thing I abstained from after I saw good candidates publicly humiliated over trifles. I figured I could contribute to a worthy cause in other areas where I wouldn't get upset, and so I did. Now my selfish behavior has come back to bite me. Your own work on RFAs is important, and I hope you keep making WP:RFA a less hostile place. I wish you all the best, and if you ever apply for adminship yourself, do let me know. [[User:Rl|Rl]] 09:32, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
263255 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263254 +++$+++ 263254 +++$+++ 2005-09-06 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.126061820E09 +++$+++ Thank you for correcting my minor grammatical error. Improvement is the spirit of the wiki. Using such errors to prove points, however, is a rather weak weapon. If you want to be taken seriously, you need to calm down.  +++$+++ :Thank you for correcting my minor grammatical error. Improvement is the spirit of the wiki. Using such errors to prove points, however, is a rather weak weapon. If you want to be taken seriously, you need to calm down. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 19:57, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

393401 +++$+++ Ericorbit +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-07 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.189196100E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I don't mean to be a jerk about the merging thing (\"Freedom\") and upon closer inspection I see [[WP:SONGS]] does not specifically outline that cover versions should be merged together.  That said, there has been a long-standing effort by many editors to get multiple versions of songs put into the same articles (I can name quite a number of them here if you really want them, plus there is a user with a check-off list that people have been working from).... in addition a few of the \"model\" articles within WP:SONGS are set up this way (merged) and I think the general consensus is that song articles are about ''songs'', not ''singles''.  Perhaps its time to reopen the discussion about cover versions in the WP:SONGS talk page. -  +++$+++ Hi.  I don't mean to be a jerk about the merging thing ("Freedom") and upon closer inspection I see [[WP:SONGS]] does not specifically outline that cover versions should be merged together.  That said, there has been a long-standing effort by many editors to get multiple versions of songs put into the same articles (I can name quite a number of them here if you really want them, plus there is a user with a check-off list that people have been working from).... in addition a few of the "model" articles within WP:SONGS are set up this way (merged) and I think the general consensus is that song articles are about ''songs'', not ''singles''.  Perhaps its time to reopen the discussion about cover versions in the WP:SONGS talk page. - [[User:Ericorbit|eo]] 13:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
393402 +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393401 +++$+++ 393401 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.189196280E09 +++$+++ Alright go ahead and merge it but at the moment it's broken, its two articles on one page. Also when you merge things you are supposed to mention where they came from in the edit summary see [[WP:MERGE]].  +++$+++ *Alright go ahead and merge it but at the moment it's broken, its two articles on one page. Also when you merge things you are supposed to mention where they came from in the edit summary see [[WP:MERGE]]. [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 13:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

1112 +++$+++ Barneca +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-20 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.229822400E09 +++$+++ I'm not online a lot, but I do have all three talk pages watched now, so if you reply, feel free to do it here, or on my talk page, and I'll reply when I get a chance. -- +++$+++ I'm not online a lot, but I do have all three talk pages watched now, so if you reply, feel free to do it here, or on my talk page, and I'll reply when I get a chance. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca|talk]]) 17:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
1113 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1112 +++$+++ 1112 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.229828760E09 +++$+++ The irony for me in all this is that if you look at my edit record, I'm right down the middle on the use of logos and images. I've removed logos from the annual German Cup summaries and advised a member of our project to avoid that type of use because we don't need the grief. I've let tons of stuff that I posted early on slide because it no longer complied with updated policies. But it is pushing things too far when folks suggest that we take pictures of logos and use those instead of logos, or drop logos in place of national flags, or let sloppy, ill-conceived bots run loose to blindly tag everything at 300px and above. All in the name of a narrowly defined view of mission. There is a group who conduct themselves like they are engaged in some sort of war of attrition in the pursuit of a belief that the place needs to be totally bereft of all non-free material regardless of whether or not its use has legitimacy under policy. That doesn't work for me and I'm tired of having to repeatedly defend the legitimate use of logos against that sort of POV editing.  +++$+++ :The irony for me in all this is that if you look at my edit record, I'm right down the middle on the use of logos and images. I've removed logos from the annual German Cup summaries and advised a member of our project to avoid that type of use because we don't need the grief. I've let tons of stuff that I posted early on slide because it no longer complied with updated policies. But it is pushing things too far when folks suggest that we take pictures of logos and use those instead of logos, or drop logos in place of national flags, or let sloppy, ill-conceived bots run loose to blindly tag everything at 300px and above. All in the name of a narrowly defined view of mission. There is a group who conduct themselves like they are engaged in some sort of war of attrition in the pursuit of a belief that the place needs to be totally bereft of all non-free material regardless of whether or not its use has legitimacy under policy. That doesn't work for me and I'm tired of having to repeatedly defend the legitimate use of logos against that sort of POV editing. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 19:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
1114 +++$+++ Barneca +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1112 +++$+++ 1113 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.229994900E09 +++$+++ I understand completely why you're annoyed with Hammersoft.  I understand completely why he is annoyed with you and Rtr10.  I tried to word that as neutrally as I could, but rest assured I didn't intend any slight on your contributions or attitude.  I'm just trying to nip something in the bud that seemed to be spiraling a little worse with every post.  I think all three of you were contributing to the spiral.  I suspect the four of us all have different opinions on who is most to blame for the spiral, but my intent was to just ask everyone to start fresh, without bothering to assign blame at all.  -- +++$+++ ::I understand completely why you're annoyed with Hammersoft.  I understand completely why he is annoyed with you and Rtr10.  I tried to word that as neutrally as I could, but rest assured I didn't intend any slight on your contributions or attitude.  I'm just trying to nip something in the bud that seemed to be spiraling a little worse with every post.  I think all three of you were contributing to the spiral.  I suspect the four of us all have different opinions on who is most to blame for the spiral, but my intent was to just ask everyone to start fresh, without bothering to assign blame at all.  --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca|talk]]) 17:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

525401 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-24 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.185263040E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, thanks for adding <code><nowiki>{{Reflist|2}}<\/nowiki><\/code> to [[5-HT3 antagonist]]\u2014sorry if the list was getting a bit unwieldy. I've reverted your removal of the book references because, although they had no footnotes tied to them, they actually formed the \"backbone\" of the article; they were used as background. Let me know if you object to this; I'll try to cite some specific facts to these sources later, but I don't have them with me right now. Best wishes,  +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, thanks for adding <code><nowiki>{{Reflist|2}}</nowiki></code> to [[5-HT3 antagonist]]—sorry if the list was getting a bit unwieldy. I've reverted your removal of the book references because, although they had no footnotes tied to them, they actually formed the "backbone" of the article; they were used as background. Let me know if you object to this; I'll try to cite some specific facts to these sources later, but I don't have them with me right now. Best wishes, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 00:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
525402 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525401 +++$+++ 525401 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.185263640E09 +++$+++ By the way, I've been meaning to start an article on [[bromopride]] for quite some time now, and your new {{tl|Propulsives}} was an excellent reminder :)  +++$+++ :By the way, I've been meaning to start an article on [[bromopride]] for quite some time now, and your new {{tl|Propulsives}} was an excellent reminder :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 00:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
525403 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525401 +++$+++ 525402 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.185264360E09 +++$+++ No problems\u2014thank ''you'' for creating these wonderful templates (and articles, of course).  +++$+++ ::No problems—thank ''you'' for creating these wonderful templates (and articles, of course). [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 01:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

263258 +++$+++ Johncarvill +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-06 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.126069800E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Johncarvill|Johncarvill]] 22:10, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
263259 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263258 +++$+++ 263258 +++$+++ 2005-09-06 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.126071060E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but I believe you are a troll.  +++$+++ :I'm sorry, but I believe you are a troll. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 22:31, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

1115 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1115 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-28 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.230451800E09 +++$+++ Same to you, Wiggy. Did you have a white christmas? I heared, Canada did rather well in that regard.  +++$+++ Same to you, Wiggy. Did you have a white christmas? I heared, Canada did rather well in that regard. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
1116 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1115 +++$+++ 1115 +++$+++ 2008-12-28 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.230456180E09 +++$+++ Yes, a white Christmas from coast to coast for the first time in decades! Spent too much time shovelling snow this week. It has since warmed up and we're getting some rain and fog here in the Toronto area with temperatures around 10\xb0C. No more snow for the next few days I hear. That suits me fine.  +++$+++ :Yes, a white Christmas from coast to coast for the first time in decades! Spent too much time shovelling snow this week. It has since warmed up and we're getting some rain and fog here in the Toronto area with temperatures around 10°C. No more snow for the next few days I hear. That suits me fine. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 01:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
1117 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1115 +++$+++ 1116 +++$+++ 2008-12-28 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.230461760E09 +++$+++ Well, I don't want to rub it in but its going to be 36\xb0C here on new years eve, not that it will help me much, I m flying back to work then and out bush it will propably be well over 40 then, a little to hot!  +++$+++ ::Well, I don't want to rub it in but its going to be 36°C here on new years eve, not that it will help me much, I m flying back to work then and out bush it will propably be well over 40 then, a little to hot! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 02:56, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

263260 +++$+++ Johncarvill +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-06 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.126072140E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Johncarvill|Johncarvill]] 22:49, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
263261 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263260 +++$+++ 263260 +++$+++ 2005-09-06 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.126074240E09 +++$+++ I believed you were\/are troll because you violate [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]]. You attempt to invoke a response from me by persistently questioning my qualifications\/experience. My response to that query was met with a similar provocative response (\"Gee whiz. I know ''I'm'' impressed.\"). You challenged my knowledge of Allen\u2019s work (how long have you waited to paraphrase that quote?). You capitalised upon a minor grammatical error in a weak attempt to challenge my credibility.  (Incidentally, the lower case \u2018l\u2019 in \u2018External links\u2019 is a wikipedia convention I was drawing your attention towards. I was explaining changes.)   +++$+++ :I believed you were/are troll because you violate [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]]. You attempt to invoke a response from me by persistently questioning my qualifications/experience. My response to that query was met with a similar provocative response ("Gee whiz. I know ''I'm'' impressed."). You challenged my knowledge of Allen’s work (how long have you waited to paraphrase that quote?). You capitalised upon a minor grammatical error in a weak attempt to challenge my credibility.  (Incidentally, the lower case ‘l’ in ‘External links’ is a wikipedia convention I was drawing your attention towards. I was explaining changes.)  [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 23:24, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

262330 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-07 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.294451880E09 +++$+++ Hi Dana, I totally missed seeing the merge tag on Spanish Walk, but it wasn't suitable for a merge to horse gait because it isn't a gait, it's a circus trick.  So I undid the merge.  You can trout slap me if I was bad.    +++$+++ Hi Dana, I totally missed seeing the merge tag on Spanish Walk, but it wasn't suitable for a merge to horse gait because it isn't a gait, it's a circus trick.  So I undid the merge.  You can trout slap me if I was bad.   [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 17:58, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
262331 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262330 +++$+++ 262330 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.294452600E09 +++$+++ But it's not really suitable for its own article, either. Do you have a better place to merge it to?  +++$+++ :But it's not really suitable for its own article, either. Do you have a better place to merge it to? [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 18:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
262332 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262330 +++$+++ 262331 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.294460820E09 +++$+++ I'm not entirely sure.  In theory it would be expanded into its own article if someone wanted to add history, training techniques and such, sort of like the articles on the bad habits -- [[rear (horse)]] and [[bucking]].  I honestly don't know.  We have trained gait variations like  [[piaffe]] and [[Passage (dressage)]] with their own articles.  The Spanish walk isn't really an alternative gait, it sort of belongs in [[circus tricks]], if there was such an article.  I suppose it could maybe be merged into [[dressage]] or [[classical dressage]], except the dressage people would probably throw a fit because it isn't a dressage thing either, not really. Hm.  Well, I guess if you think Piaffe and Passage are OK to be free-standing, maybe I can dig up enough stuff to expand Spanish walk, or we (me) could create some sort of new article incorporating several related concepts.   +++$+++ ::I'm not entirely sure.  In theory it would be expanded into its own article if someone wanted to add history, training techniques and such, sort of like the articles on the bad habits -- [[rear (horse)]] and [[bucking]].  I honestly don't know.  We have trained gait variations like  [[piaffe]] and [[Passage (dressage)]] with their own articles.  The Spanish walk isn't really an alternative gait, it sort of belongs in [[circus tricks]], if there was such an article.  I suppose it could maybe be merged into [[dressage]] or [[classical dressage]], except the dressage people would probably throw a fit because it isn't a dressage thing either, not really. Hm.  Well, I guess if you think Piaffe and Passage are OK to be free-standing, maybe I can dig up enough stuff to expand Spanish walk, or we (me) could create some sort of new article incorporating several related concepts.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 20:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
262333 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262330 +++$+++ 262332 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.294466400E09 +++$+++ I think that maybe one article incorporated several related comments would be the way to go. We want to make sure that the article(s) doesn't become a \"how-to\" manual with step by step training techniques. I always prefer slightly longer, comprehensive articles, though, to multiple stubby bits.  +++$+++ :::I think that maybe one article incorporated several related comments would be the way to go. We want to make sure that the article(s) doesn't become a "how-to" manual with step by step training techniques. I always prefer slightly longer, comprehensive articles, though, to multiple stubby bits. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:00, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
262334 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262330 +++$+++ 262333 +++$+++ 2011-01-08 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.294486020E09 +++$+++ I agree about avoiding a how to and I also favor comprehensive articles. (I'd love to merge [[flying change]], and [[lead (leg)]].)  But not sure where to go here because the thing doesn't fit into any other category very  neatly ... the people who like it rank it as a dressage move, but the dressage purists call it trick riding. The Spanish Riding School doesn't use it, but it's part of the Spanish training tradition.  Kinda, sorta...  I think that once upon a time passage and piaffe got broken out from trot, though both are short articles.  On the other hand, where once were a bunch of stubs on all the different airs above the ground and they were all merged back into [[classical dressage]] (Actually, I could even make a good argument to merge classical dressage and dressage, but doing so would involve a LOT of work).   I guess there is probably enough material to expand the Spanish Walk article a little (I added another sentence or so).  But I can't think of where to place a merge.  +++$+++ ::::I agree about avoiding a how to and I also favor comprehensive articles. (I'd love to merge [[flying change]], and [[lead (leg)]].)  But not sure where to go here because the thing doesn't fit into any other category very  neatly ... the people who like it rank it as a dressage move, but the dressage purists call it trick riding. The Spanish Riding School doesn't use it, but it's part of the Spanish training tradition.  Kinda, sorta...  I think that once upon a time passage and piaffe got broken out from trot, though both are short articles.  On the other hand, where once were a bunch of stubs on all the different airs above the ground and they were all merged back into [[classical dressage]] (Actually, I could even make a good argument to merge classical dressage and dressage, but doing so would involve a LOT of work).   I guess there is probably enough material to expand the Spanish Walk article a little (I added another sentence or so).  But I can't think of where to place a merge. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 03:27, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
262335 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262330 +++$+++ 262334 +++$+++ 2011-01-08 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.294528260E09 +++$+++ I suppose I can see your point about there not being a good place to merge it to. However, if you'd like to toss merge tags onto flying change, piaffe and passage I would definitely back you up on those. Wow, the trot article needs some work...  +++$+++ :::::I suppose I can see your point about there not being a good place to merge it to. However, if you'd like to toss merge tags onto flying change, piaffe and passage I would definitely back you up on those. Wow, the trot article needs some work... [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 15:11, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
262336 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262330 +++$+++ 262335 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.294572060E09 +++$+++ Yep, that and ever so many other articles...let's see, it can get in line behind vaquero, horse tack, equine conformation ...  =:-O  (grin).   +++$+++ ::::::Yep, that and ever so many other articles...let's see, it can get in line behind vaquero, horse tack, equine conformation ...  =:-O  (grin).  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 03:21, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
262337 +++$+++ Ealdgyth +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262330 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.294572660E09 +++$+++ We are woefully underpaid, that's for sure. And I've gotten sucked into working on some of the TB stuff, since I may be one of the few people around with an extensive enough library to source out articles on the various stakes winning horses of the late 19th century. Whee. I'll be around until the end of Jan, and then MBW knows where I'll be... imitating [[Willie Nelson|good ole Willie-boy]]. Think after I get back we'll be ready to tackle ... (make ominous sounding music in the background) ... [[Horse]]? Or are we not that brave?  +++$+++ :::::::: We are woefully underpaid, that's for sure. And I've gotten sucked into working on some of the TB stuff, since I may be one of the few people around with an extensive enough library to source out articles on the various stakes winning horses of the late 19th century. Whee. I'll be around until the end of Jan, and then MBW knows where I'll be... imitating [[Willie Nelson|good ole Willie-boy]]. Think after I get back we'll be ready to tackle ... (make ominous sounding music in the background) ... [[Horse]]? Or are we not that brave? [[User:Ealdgyth|Ealdgyth]] - [[User talk:Ealdgyth|Talk]] 03:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
262338 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262330 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.294640580E09 +++$+++ I think that we could tackle Horse after you get back. With all of our puttering over the past few years I think it should be getting close. I'd like to get [[Appaloosa]] up first, but we need to fix or replace the last two images with issues first... Other than that, I think it just needs a look-over by Malleus and it should be good to go. Anyone willing to help out on the last images? Pretty please?  +++$+++ :::::::::I think that we could tackle Horse after you get back. With all of our puttering over the past few years I think it should be getting close. I'd like to get [[Appaloosa]] up first, but we need to fix or replace the last two images with issues first... Other than that, I think it just needs a look-over by Malleus and it should be good to go. Anyone willing to help out on the last images? Pretty please? [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
262339 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262330 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-15 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.297837980E09 +++$+++ Don't we call that \"striking?\"  ;-)  The point is that the exhibition version isn't really any kind of natural gait, unlike, say, the piaffe and particularly the passage, which you do sometimes see with high-spirited horses that are in a playful mood!  +++$+++ :::::::::::::Don't we call that "striking?"  ;-)  The point is that the exhibition version isn't really any kind of natural gait, unlike, say, the piaffe and particularly the passage, which you do sometimes see with high-spirited horses that are in a playful mood! [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 22:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
262340 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262330 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-16 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.297928520E09 +++$+++ I once owned a horse who could perform a lovely passage while chasing the neighbor's Basset Hound out of the pasture!  She'd trot with her nose two inches from the dog, who ran as fast as its stubby little legs could go.  Her ears were up, she was having a grand time, the dog was terrified, (not realizing she was being \"escorted off the property\") we all laughed so hard watching that we almost lost bladder control!   +++$+++ ::::::::::::::::I once owned a horse who could perform a lovely passage while chasing the neighbor's Basset Hound out of the pasture!  She'd trot with her nose two inches from the dog, who ran as fast as its stubby little legs could go.  Her ears were up, she was having a grand time, the dog was terrified, (not realizing she was being "escorted off the property") we all laughed so hard watching that we almost lost bladder control!  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 23:42, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

263262 +++$+++ TheMadBaron +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-07 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.126110600E09 +++$+++ What is clear from this exchange is that [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] understands encyclopaedic writing, and the open nature and policies of Wikipedia, while [[User:Johncarvill|Johncarvill]] does not. The rest is just piss and vinegar.  +++$+++ What is clear from this exchange is that [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] understands encyclopaedic writing, and the open nature and policies of Wikipedia, while [[User:Johncarvill|Johncarvill]] does not. The rest is just piss and vinegar. [[User:TheMadBaron|TheMadBaron]] 09:30, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
263263 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263262 +++$+++ 263262 +++$+++ 2005-09-08 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.126192920E09 +++$+++ Sorry to arrive late; I've just got back from a few days away.  It looks as though things are sorted out, but I'll keep an eye on the article in case there's another outbreak. -- +++$+++ :Sorry to arrive late; I've just got back from a few days away.  It looks as though things are sorted out, but I'll keep an eye on the article in case there's another outbreak. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">&Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf;</font>)]] 08:22, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

1119 +++$+++ LUCPOL +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1119 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-28 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.230498540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:LUCPOL|LUCPOL]] ([[User talk:LUCPOL|talk]]) 13:09, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
1120 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1119 +++$+++ 1119 +++$+++ 2008-12-28 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.230500760E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Some of these I knew about others I did not. I will add more over time. Thank you for the references also.  +++$+++ :Thanks. Some of these I knew about others I did not. I will add more over time. Thank you for the references also. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 13:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

525408 +++$+++ Navou +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-29 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.185702480E09 +++$+++ I do appreciate you adding the box, and inlines.  You doing well, keep it up.  Regards,  +++$+++ I do appreciate you adding the box, and inlines.  You doing well, keep it up.  Regards, [[User:Navou|Navou]] <sup> [[User talk:Navou|banter]] </sup> 02:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
525409 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525408 +++$+++ 525408 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.185762960E09 +++$+++ And I appreciate you starting the article. It is always easier to add something than to start something. -- +++$+++ :And I appreciate you starting the article. It is always easier to add something than to start something. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 19:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

1121 +++$+++ STBotI +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1121 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-28 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.230509220E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:STBotI|STBotI]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:STBotI|STBotI]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. [[User:STBotI|STBotI]] ([[User talk:STBotI|talk]]) 16:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
1122 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1121 +++$+++ 1121 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.230594000E09 +++$+++ Resolved.  +++$+++ :Resolved. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 15:40, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

525410 +++$+++ Rhcastilhos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525410 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-29 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.185761460E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on your templates about medicine and anatomy. I'm a medicine student from [[Porto Alegre]], [[Brazil]] and I think they're very useful. Besides, I've translated some of them to Wikipedia in portuguese. Keep the good work, you are helping people here in Brazil, too. =)  +++$+++ Congratulations on your templates about medicine and anatomy. I'm a medicine student from [[Porto Alegre]], [[Brazil]] and I think they're very useful. Besides, I've translated some of them to Wikipedia in portuguese. Keep the good work, you are helping people here in Brazil, too. =) [[User:Rhcastilhos|Rhcastilhos]] 19:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
525411 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525410 +++$+++ 525410 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.185763920E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I've browsed through your [http:\/\/pt.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Especial:Contributions&limit=500&target=Rhcastilhos Portuguese contributions], and it's amazing how many articles and templates you've started over there. Keep up the good work, and good luck with your studies! -- +++$+++ :Thank you! I've browsed through your [http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Especial:Contributions&limit=500&target=Rhcastilhos Portuguese contributions], and it's amazing how many articles and templates you've started over there. Keep up the good work, and good luck with your studies! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 19:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

1123 +++$+++ STBotI +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1123 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-28 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.230511620E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:STBotI|STBotI]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:STBotI|STBotI]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. [[User:STBotI|STBotI]] ([[User talk:STBotI|talk]]) 16:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
1124 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1123 +++$+++ 1123 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.230594000E09 +++$+++ Resolved.  +++$+++ :Resolved. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 15:40, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

1125 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1125 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-05 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.231208640E09 +++$+++ Have you seen [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/German football champions|this]]?  +++$+++ Have you seen [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/German football champions|this]]? [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 18:24, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
1126 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1125 +++$+++ 1125 +++$+++ 2009-01-05 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.231208820E09 +++$+++ I have now. Thank you.  +++$+++ :I have now. Thank you. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 18:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

263270 +++$+++ Anonunit +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-15 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.132118220E09 +++$+++ Hi. I noticed that you edited the article on Pascale Hutton. She was actually in a different movie called [http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0402910\/ Chaos], which there is no article for.-- +++$+++ Hi. I noticed that you edited the article on Pascale Hutton. She was actually in a different movie called [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0402910/ Chaos], which there is no article for.--[[User:Anonunit|Anonunit]] 21:17, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
263271 +++$+++ Anonunit +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263270 +++$+++ 263270 +++$+++ 2005-11-15 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.132118220E09 +++$+++ Sorry that I had this all the way at the top. I wasn't sure if you wanted your most recent messages at the top, or the bottom.-- +++$+++ :Sorry that I had this all the way at the top. I wasn't sure if you wanted your most recent messages at the top, or the bottom.--[[User:Anonunit|Anonunit]] 21:17, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

480785 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480785 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-27 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.146205620E09 +++$+++ [[User:AmiDaniel\/Welcome to VandalProof|This]] is where the user list is kept, the other list is pretty much just for show. So if you make a mistake adding a user, revert that page, as well as the other.  +++$+++ [[User:AmiDaniel/Welcome to VandalProof|This]] is where the user list is kept, the other list is pretty much just for show. So if you make a mistake adding a user, revert that page, as well as the other. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 23:27, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
480786 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480785 +++$+++ 480785 +++$+++ 2006-04-27 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.146205980E09 +++$+++ What user list? The one I linked to?  +++$+++ :What user list? The one I linked to? [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 23:33, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
480787 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480785 +++$+++ 480786 +++$+++ 2006-04-27 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.146206220E09 +++$+++ Sure, do you want me to?  +++$+++ ::Sure, do you want me to? [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 23:37, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
480788 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480785 +++$+++ 480787 +++$+++ 2006-04-27 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.146206460E09 +++$+++ Hmm that's odd, it usually loads up after a second or two, hold on, I'll check.  +++$+++ :::Hmm that's odd, it usually loads up after a second or two, hold on, I'll check. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 23:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
480789 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480785 +++$+++ 480786 +++$+++ 2006-04-27 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.146206820E09 +++$+++ I had no problem, the list loaded about 5 seconds after the awaiting approval section did, as normal. I think I can guess what happened. You didn't let it load the first time, then the second time you reloaded the page '''that you had just blanked''', so there were no approved users. After I reverted all the users back, they loaded fine. That's my thoery.  +++$+++ ::I had no problem, the list loaded about 5 seconds after the awaiting approval section did, as normal. I think I can guess what happened. You didn't let it load the first time, then the second time you reloaded the page '''that you had just blanked''', so there were no approved users. After I reverted all the users back, they loaded fine. That's my thoery. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 23:47, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

525416 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525416 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-31 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.185870300E09 +++$+++ Hey Arcadian... tired of me yet? I was wondering if you'd mind merging [[CDP choline]] into [[citicoline]], as they're the same compound and citicoline is the INN. You may of course replace the drugbox with {{tl|chembox new}} if you feel it's more appropriate. Best,  +++$+++ Hey Arcadian... tired of me yet? I was wondering if you'd mind merging [[CDP choline]] into [[citicoline]], as they're the same compound and citicoline is the INN. You may of course replace the drugbox with {{tl|chembox new}} if you feel it's more appropriate. Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 01:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
525417 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525416 +++$+++ 525416 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.185870840E09 +++$+++ Thanks :)  +++$+++ :Thanks :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 01:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
525418 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525416 +++$+++ 525417 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.185870900E09 +++$+++ No problem -- thanks for spotting it. -- +++$+++ ::No problem -- thanks for spotting it. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

1129 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1129 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.232873100E09 +++$+++ Hey Wiggy!, a little dilemma here: I've recently been doing some work on German rugby union articles and come to this article, [[Deutscher FV 1878 Hannover]]. Now, I've created a new one for the current club team [[DSV 78\/08 Ricklingen]], which is just an on-the-field union. The former ''DFV 78'' has been renamed in 1929 to ''DSV 78'', as you propably know, should we propose a move of the current article to [[DSV 78 Hannover]] (currently a redirect page)? You as the creater should have first say, I would think.  +++$+++ Hey Wiggy!, a little dilemma here: I've recently been doing some work on German rugby union articles and come to this article, [[Deutscher FV 1878 Hannover]]. Now, I've created a new one for the current club team [[DSV 78/08 Ricklingen]], which is just an on-the-field union. The former ''DFV 78'' has been renamed in 1929 to ''DSV 78'', as you propably know, should we propose a move of the current article to [[DSV 78 Hannover]] (currently a redirect page)? You as the creater should have first say, I would think. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
1130 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1129 +++$+++ 1129 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.232884560E09 +++$+++ I think it only really becomes a problem (in the context of the German Football Wikiproject) where the history or origin of a club as a German side gets too thoroughly masked or buried in the article of a current-day side which is no longer part of German competition. There are a couple of articles that have drifted off in that direction that I was thinking of deconstructing a bit in order to maintain their validity in context of German football.  +++$+++ :I think it only really becomes a problem (in the context of the German Football Wikiproject) where the history or origin of a club as a German side gets too thoroughly masked or buried in the article of a current-day side which is no longer part of German competition. There are a couple of articles that have drifted off in that direction that I was thinking of deconstructing a bit in order to maintain their validity in context of German football. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 03:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
1131 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1129 +++$+++ 1130 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.232890020E09 +++$+++ I will request a move, needs to be done by a admin, I think, as the new article name already exists. That way we preserve the histroy of the article. Once that is done I will categorise the redirect page, as you suggested.  +++$+++ ::I will request a move, needs to be done by a admin, I think, as the new article name already exists. That way we preserve the histroy of the article. Once that is done I will categorise the redirect page, as you suggested. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 05:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
1132 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1129 +++$+++ 1131 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.232890560E09 +++$+++ Apparently, the bug that prevented me from doing such a move in the past has now been fixed, its all done and the category has been added to the redirect.  +++$+++ :::Apparently, the bug that prevented me from doing such a move in the past has now been fixed, its all done and the category has been added to the redirect. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 05:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

525419 +++$+++ Roadnottaken +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525419 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-04 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.186263600E09 +++$+++ I need an administrators opinion:  the [[Peter Tishler]] article is written like eulogy and doesn't have the right tone.  I'm pretty sure its a relative of his writing it and I think the page should be toned down a LOT.  I left an NPOV notice on the author's talk page ([[User:Ltishler]]) but they've continued to expand the page since then.  How to proceed?  Thanks!   +++$+++ I need an administrators opinion:  the [[Peter Tishler]] article is written like eulogy and doesn't have the right tone.  I'm pretty sure its a relative of his writing it and I think the page should be toned down a LOT.  I left an NPOV notice on the author's talk page ([[User:Ltishler]]) but they've continued to expand the page since then.  How to proceed?  Thanks!  [[User:Roadnottaken|Roadnottaken]] 14:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
525420 +++$+++ Roadnottaken +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525419 +++$+++ 525419 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.186263720E09 +++$+++ update:  I just noticed that [[User:Ltishler]] has made an effort to make the article more neutral since my notice, but it still seems sort of inappropriately long and detailed to me for some reason.   +++$+++ *update:  I just noticed that [[User:Ltishler]] has made an effort to make the article more neutral since my notice, but it still seems sort of inappropriately long and detailed to me for some reason.  [[User:Roadnottaken|Roadnottaken]] 14:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
525421 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525419 +++$+++ 525420 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.186293780E09 +++$+++ In my opinion, it would probably (narrowly) survive a VfD, but it would be appropriate for you to add [[Template:Inappropriate tone]] to the top, and add the [[Template:Fact]] prompt to the assertions that are probably unverifiable. -- +++$+++ ::In my opinion, it would probably (narrowly) survive a VfD, but it would be appropriate for you to add [[Template:Inappropriate tone]] to the top, and add the [[Template:Fact]] prompt to the assertions that are probably unverifiable. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

263277 +++$+++ gadfium +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263277 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-22 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.135307640E09 +++$+++ I see you've been involved in reverting some of this vandal's edits, so I thought I'd let you know that I've created a section at [[Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress\/Long_term_alerts#Vegan_vandal|Vandalism in progress\/Long term alerts]] for the \"Vegan vandal\".- +++$+++ I see you've been involved in reverting some of this vandal's edits, so I thought I'd let you know that I've created a section at [[Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress/Long_term_alerts#Vegan_vandal|Vandalism in progress/Long term alerts]] for the "Vegan vandal".-[[User:Gadfium|gadfium]] 19:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
263278 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263277 +++$+++ 263277 +++$+++ 2005-12-25 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.135547520E09 +++$+++ I looked threw his history and noticed yes he is recieving vandalism, I will help by checking his article every little while and yes i will probably join the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_British_TV_shows]]-- +++$+++ :I looked threw his history and noticed yes he is recieving vandalism, I will help by checking his article every little while and yes i will probably join the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_British_TV_shows]]--[[User:MatthewFenton|MatthewFenton]] 13:52, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

525422 +++$+++ Tdkehoe +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-04 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.186268160E09 +++$+++ Why did you remove summaries of many scientific studies on the [[Stuttering]] page on July 29? I can't find your Edit summary explaining why you did this.-- +++$+++ Why did you remove summaries of many scientific studies on the [[Stuttering]] page on July 29? I can't find your Edit summary explaining why you did this.--[[User:Tdkehoe|Tdkehoe]] 15:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
525423 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525422 +++$+++ 525422 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.186293000E09 +++$+++ Please review the edit history more carefully. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Stuttering&diff=147878950&oldid=147765574 This] was my only edit to the Stuttering page on July 29. -- +++$+++ :Please review the edit history more carefully. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stuttering&diff=147878950&oldid=147765574 This] was my only edit to the Stuttering page on July 29. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:50, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

263279 +++$+++ Athena2006 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263279 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-30 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.135995840E09 +++$+++ You're welcome.  And thanks for correcting the format.  I'm still new and still learning. -- +++$+++ You're welcome.  And thanks for correcting the format.  I'm still new and still learning. --[[User:Athena2006|Athena2006]] 18:24, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
263280 +++$+++ Athena2006 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263279 +++$+++ 263279 +++$+++ 2005-12-30 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.135997340E09 +++$+++ I just joined WikiProject Films.  Thanks for the info. -- +++$+++ :I just joined WikiProject Films.  Thanks for the info. --[[User:Athena2006|Athena2006]] 18:49, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

525424 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525424 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-05 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.186378920E09 +++$+++ }}, {{#if:{{{2|}}}|have|has}} been marked for deletion as {{#if:{{{2|}}}||a}} deprecated and orphaned template{{#if:{{{2|}}}|s}}. If, after 14 days, there {{#if:{{{2|}}}|have|has}} been no objection{{#if:{{{2|}}}|s}}, the template{{#if:{{{2|}}}|s}} will be deleted. If you wish to object to {{#if:{{{2|}}}|their|its}} deletion, please list your objection{{#if:{{{2|}}}|s}} [[Wikipedia talk:Templates for deletion\/Deprecated and orphaned templates#Objections|here]] and feel free to remove the {{tlx|deprecated}} tag from the template{{#if:{{{2|}}}|s}}. If you feel the deletion{{#if:{{{2|}}}|s}} {{#if:{{{2|}}}|are|is}} appropriate, no further action is necessary. Cheers. -- +++$+++ }}, {{#if:{{{2|}}}|have|has}} been marked for deletion as {{#if:{{{2|}}}||a}} deprecated and orphaned template{{#if:{{{2|}}}|s}}. If, after 14 days, there {{#if:{{{2|}}}|have|has}} been no objection{{#if:{{{2|}}}|s}}, the template{{#if:{{{2|}}}|s}} will be deleted. If you wish to object to {{#if:{{{2|}}}|their|its}} deletion, please list your objection{{#if:{{{2|}}}|s}} [[Wikipedia talk:Templates for deletion/Deprecated and orphaned templates#Objections|here]] and feel free to remove the {{tlx|deprecated}} tag from the template{{#if:{{{2|}}}|s}}. If you feel the deletion{{#if:{{{2|}}}|s}} {{#if:{{{2|}}}|are|is}} appropriate, no further action is necessary. Cheers. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] 22:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
525425 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525424 +++$+++ 525424 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.186661400E09 +++$+++ I have no objection to its deletion. -- +++$+++ :I have no objection to its deletion. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 05:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

1137 +++$+++ Kevin McE +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-15 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.237167480E09 +++$+++ There is no more merit in having an article [[Notable former players of Somewhere Town F.C.]] than there is having a section on the [[Somewhere Town F.C.]] article of ''Notable former players'': if a list is OR, it as just as OR as an article as it is as a section.  +++$+++ There is no more merit in having an article [[Notable former players of Somewhere Town F.C.]] than there is having a section on the [[Somewhere Town F.C.]] article of ''Notable former players'': if a list is OR, it as just as OR as an article as it is as a section. [[User:Kevin McE|Kevin McE]] ([[User talk:Kevin McE|talk]]) 18:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
1138 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1137 +++$+++ 1137 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.237168080E09 +++$+++ You're missing the point. The list approach is already established and supported in the context of English clubs. There's no reason not to extend the notion. Its just a judgement free collection of article links of players related to a given club, ''not'' a list of famous or notable players (whatever that means, right?). I'm trying to suggest a useful\/neutral way out of the mindless cycle of edit wars over this subject. You might want to consider it as a more proactive approach.  +++$+++ :You're missing the point. The list approach is already established and supported in the context of English clubs. There's no reason not to extend the notion. Its just a judgement free collection of article links of players related to a given club, ''not'' a list of famous or notable players (whatever that means, right?). I'm trying to suggest a useful/neutral way out of the mindless cycle of edit wars over this subject. You might want to consider it as a more proactive approach. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 18:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
1139 +++$+++ Kevin McE +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1137 +++$+++ 1138 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.237256880E09 +++$+++ Somebody wisely suggested on the FOOTY talk page ''\"Just mark 'em all up as having played with a particular club with a category tag and be done.\"'' Can't remember who ;@)    I think that is a far better idea than creating [[List of XXX F.C. players]] unless there is a real commitment to making that list complete.   +++$+++ ::Somebody wisely suggested on the FOOTY talk page ''"Just mark 'em all up as having played with a particular club with a category tag and be done."'' Can't remember who ;@)    I think that is a far better idea than creating [[List of XXX F.C. players]] unless there is a real commitment to making that list complete.  [[User:Kevin McE|Kevin McE]] ([[User talk:Kevin McE|talk]]) 19:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

525426 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-08 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.186619100E09 +++$+++ I'm banned from editing the page, and don't know what I might do in any case, but what do you think of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lupus_erythematosus&curid=18427&diff=149381224&oldid=149334086 this] edit?   +++$+++ I'm banned from editing the page, and don't know what I might do in any case, but what do you think of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lupus_erythematosus&curid=18427&diff=149381224&oldid=149334086 this] edit?  [[User:WLU|WLU]] 17:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
525427 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525426 +++$+++ 525426 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.186661340E09 +++$+++ From the way it's written (\"may be used\", \"may occur\"), it's not falsifiable. It's unreferenced, but I've seen much worse. I'm guessing that there's some editing context here I'm not familiar with -- if you have a more specific question, I may be able to offer a more specific reply. -- +++$+++ : From the way it's written ("may be used", "may occur"), it's not falsifiable. It's unreferenced, but I've seen much worse. I'm guessing that there's some editing context here I'm not familiar with -- if you have a more specific question, I may be able to offer a more specific reply. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 05:09, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

263283 +++$+++ 82.71.33.246 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-26 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.138341000E09 +++$+++ I'll get you, The JPS.  +++$+++ I'll get you, The JPS. [[User:82.71.33.246|82.71.33.246]] 21:50, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
263284 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263283 +++$+++ 263283 +++$+++ 2006-01-27 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.138351380E09 +++$+++ That's if The Mekon doesn't get me first, eh? (confused people should see the edit history to ''[[Going Live!]]'' --  +++$+++ :That's if The Mekon doesn't get me first, eh? (confused people should see the edit history to ''[[Going Live!]]'' -- [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 00:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

1141 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1141 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-19 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.237447980E09 +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, how are you? Just a quick question. When I went through the German club articles and tagged all the talk pages I noticed that there is quite a number of them without logos. If I made a list of them, would you be able to dig up some logos, over time? If I upload them, providing I can source them all, they usually are of low quality and soon some bot comes along and tells me there would be much better in xyz-format.  +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, how are you? Just a quick question. When I went through the German club articles and tagged all the talk pages I noticed that there is quite a number of them without logos. If I made a list of them, would you be able to dig up some logos, over time? If I upload them, providing I can source them all, they usually are of low quality and soon some bot comes along and tells me there would be much better in xyz-format. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
1142 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1141 +++$+++ 1141 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.237449060E09 +++$+++ The good weather is returning to this part of Canada (although we probably have a wee bit more winter ahead of us yet) and its a real exciting Bundesliga contest this year, so life is good. Keep well.  +++$+++ :The good weather is returning to this part of Canada (although we probably have a wee bit more winter ahead of us yet) and its a real exciting Bundesliga contest this year, so life is good. Keep well. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 00:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
1143 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1141 +++$+++ 1142 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.237450740E09 +++$+++ I start that list on the club logos and post it here for you, see how you go.  +++$+++ ::I start that list on the club logos and post it here for you, see how you go. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 01:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

263287 +++$+++ Dustybin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-05 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.139193780E09 +++$+++ Thank you for sorting out the [[:Image:Linda Day.gif]] picture for me, please could you do the rest of them, as I'm just starting to know what to do with this.   +++$+++ Thank you for sorting out the [[:Image:Linda Day.gif]] picture for me, please could you do the rest of them, as I'm just starting to know what to do with this.  [[User:Dustybin|Dustybin]] 18:43, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
263288 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263287 +++$+++ 263287 +++$+++ 2006-02-05 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.139194080E09 +++$+++ I'll try to get round to it, but you really must not upload any more images if you are unprepared to add the correct tags.  +++$+++ :I'll try to get round to it, but you really must not upload any more images if you are unprepared to add the correct tags. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 18:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

1144 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1144 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-19 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.237452000E09 +++$+++ I will continue searching but it may become a rather large task, looking at it now!  +++$+++ I will continue searching but it may become a rather large task, looking at it now! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 01:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
1145 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1144 +++$+++ 1144 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.237488840E09 +++$+++ Look here: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:Nologo.png  +++$+++ :Look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nologo.png [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 11:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
1146 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1144 +++$+++ 1145 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.237489920E09 +++$+++ I did, after I finished the list! Don't rub it in! But, to make the effort worth while, there is a few not on the nologo list. I havn't included defunct or womens clubs. Long enough as it is! Enjoy!  +++$+++ ::I did, after I finished the list! Don't rub it in! But, to make the effort worth while, there is a few not on the nologo list. I havn't included defunct or womens clubs. Long enough as it is! Enjoy! [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 12:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

263289 +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-10 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.139630340E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. --  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- [[User talk:Carnildo|Carnildo]] 19:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
263290 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263289 +++$+++ 263289 +++$+++ 2006-02-11 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.139659440E09 +++$+++ Hello. You've only changed the tag, but still haven't provided a source. What is the text? Exactly where is this from? I appreciate the details you have provided, but can we have a link to the source, so the status can be verified by other users?  +++$+++ :Hello. You've only changed the tag, but still haven't provided a source. What is the text? Exactly where is this from? I appreciate the details you have provided, but can we have a link to the source, so the status can be verified by other users? [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 04:04, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
263291 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263289 +++$+++ 263290 +++$+++ 2006-02-14 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.139914140E09 +++$+++ I have not \"waited until now.\" It's that I've only just come across it to verify. There are more people uploading images than there are verifying them. That is why there has been a delay.  +++$+++ ::I have not "waited until now." It's that I've only just come across it to verify. There are more people uploading images than there are verifying them. That is why there has been a delay. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 02:49, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

525434 +++$+++ Badagnani +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-14 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.187153880E09 +++$+++ Hi, could you add an infobox (and molecular structure image, if possible) for [[Magnesium trisilicate]]?  +++$+++ Hi, could you add an infobox (and molecular structure image, if possible) for [[Magnesium trisilicate]]? [[User:Badagnani|Badagnani]] 21:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
525435 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525434 +++$+++ 525434 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.187154240E09 +++$+++ I've added the infobox -- I haven't added the image, but it's now in the category of pages that need images, so other people will see it. -- +++$+++ :I've added the infobox -- I haven't added the image, but it's now in the category of pages that need images, so other people will see it. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

525436 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-16 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.187311440E09 +++$+++ Could you review my [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Vein&diff=151643743&oldid=149685600 recent changes] to [[Vein]] for accuracy?  I'm going on my 10-year old memory of anatomy and physiology.  Thanks!   +++$+++ Could you review my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vein&diff=151643743&oldid=149685600 recent changes] to [[Vein]] for accuracy?  I'm going on my 10-year old memory of anatomy and physiology.  Thanks!  [[User:WLU|WLU]] 17:44, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
525437 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525436 +++$+++ 525436 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.187584740E09 +++$+++ I looked through it, and it seemed okay (though the whole Vein article could use some work.) -- +++$+++ :I looked through it, and it seemed okay (though the whole Vein article could use some work.) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 21:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

1149 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-28 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.238265300E09 +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, I just created [[:Category:Football clubs from former German territories]] since a number of clubs that were in the [[:Category:Defunct football clubs from former German territories]] and [[:Category:Defunct German football clubs]] didn't really fit that tag, especially clubs from Alsace. If you can think of any others that you have created the article for and would qualify, can you please add them? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, I just created [[:Category:Football clubs from former German territories]] since a number of clubs that were in the [[:Category:Defunct football clubs from former German territories]] and [[:Category:Defunct German football clubs]] didn't really fit that tag, especially clubs from Alsace. If you can think of any others that you have created the article for and would qualify, can you please add them? Thanks, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 11:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
1150 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1149 +++$+++ 1149 +++$+++ 2009-03-28 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.238265960E09 +++$+++ You're right. Will do. Thanks for the note.  +++$+++ :You're right. Will do. Thanks for the note. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 11:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

525438 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-20 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.187597160E09 +++$+++ Agreed.  It's on my unofficial to-do list.  Which never gets shorter.   +++$+++ Agreed.  It's on my unofficial to-do list.  Which never gets shorter.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] 01:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
525439 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525438 +++$+++ 525438 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.187569080E09 +++$+++ You only have two edits under your \"Cato92\" account, so I'm not sure what you mean by \"I\". Does that mean that you are taking responsibility for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ganciclovir&diff=151769755&oldid=150889798 this edit by 75.5.240.79] to [[ganciclovir]], and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ganciclovir&diff=150552688&oldid=148169016 this one by 75.37.107.123]? -- +++$+++ :You only have two edits under your "Cato92" account, so I'm not sure what you mean by "I". Does that mean that you are taking responsibility for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ganciclovir&diff=151769755&oldid=150889798 this edit by 75.5.240.79] to [[ganciclovir]], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ganciclovir&diff=150552688&oldid=148169016 this one by 75.37.107.123]? --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 17:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

1151 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1151 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-02 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.238741100E09 +++$+++ Thanks, the logo looks much better now. You wouldn't have a logo for the two predessesor clubs by any chance?  +++$+++ Thanks, the logo looks much better now. You wouldn't have a logo for the two predessesor clubs by any chance? [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 23:45, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
1152 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1151 +++$+++ 1151 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.238748660E09 +++$+++ Yes, I've got a logo for SpVgg that I will render maybe this weekend sometime. Not for TSV though. Although the logo on the handball page might be it http:\/\/www.handballinviernheim.de\/. +++$+++ :Yes, I've got a logo for SpVgg that I will render maybe this weekend sometime. Not for TSV though. Although the logo on the handball page might be it http://www.handballinviernheim.de/.[[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 01:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
1153 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1151 +++$+++ 1152 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.238749080E09 +++$+++ Yep. Here we go http:\/\/fussball.rioweb.de\/indexhptsv.htm.  +++$+++ ::Yep. Here we go http://fussball.rioweb.de/indexhptsv.htm. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 01:58, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

525440 +++$+++ Brichcja +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525440 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-17 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.187409480E09 +++$+++ Hi. I notice that you've recently added a lot of antiseptic stubs to WP. I had a quick look, and it seems that many of them already have articles under their correct chemical names. For example, mercuric iodide is actually [[Mercury(II) iodide]] and cetylpyridinum is actually [[Cetylpyridinium chloride]]. I've turned these two into redirects to the correct articles, but could I get you to go back and check the others? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi. I notice that you've recently added a lot of antiseptic stubs to WP. I had a quick look, and it seems that many of them already have articles under their correct chemical names. For example, mercuric iodide is actually [[Mercury(II) iodide]] and cetylpyridinum is actually [[Cetylpyridinium chloride]]. I've turned these two into redirects to the correct articles, but could I get you to go back and check the others? Thanks, [[User:Brichcja|Chris]] 20:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
525441 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525440 +++$+++ 525440 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.187567820E09 +++$+++ It looks like you've taken care of this already -- thank you for doing so. -- +++$+++ :It looks like you've taken care of this already -- thank you for doing so. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 16:57, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

263297 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-15 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.139992620E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'm very surprised at your removal of the tag. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image:St1AdPic.jpg&curid=1595801&diff=39655521&oldid=39640394] In what way have I gone against policy? I have tagged the image as ''possibly'' unfree and listed it on the relevant page for discussion by the wider community. The tag directs attention to the discussion allowing more people to participate.  +++$+++ Hi. I'm very surprised at your removal of the tag. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:St1AdPic.jpg&curid=1595801&diff=39655521&oldid=39640394] In what way have I gone against policy? I have tagged the image as ''possibly'' unfree and listed it on the relevant page for discussion by the wider community. The tag directs attention to the discussion allowing more people to participate. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 00:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
263298 +++$+++ Cool Cat +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263297 +++$+++ 263297 +++$+++ 2006-02-15 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.139994480E09 +++$+++ --<small> +++$+++ :--<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cool Cat]]<sup>[[User talk:Cool Cat|Talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Cool Cat|@]]</sup></small> 01:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
263299 +++$+++ Husnock +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263297 +++$+++ 263298 +++$+++ 2006-02-15 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.139994600E09 +++$+++ You have not gone against policy.  CoolCat was confused (he really does mean well, though).  The tag has been restored.  Our new image tag will most liekly solve this problem.  I hope it gets accepted by the wider (or wierder?) community.  Thanks - +++$+++ ::You have not gone against policy.  CoolCat was confused (he really does mean well, though).  The tag has been restored.  Our new image tag will most liekly solve this problem.  I hope it gets accepted by the wider (or wierder?) community.  Thanks -[[User:Husnock|Husnock]] 01:10, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

525442 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.187567460E09 +++$+++ Hi, is it normal practice to remove lists of references ''en bloc''? That list was added to the article to demonstrate the references&mdash;as opposed to direct citations&mdash;used. I had made use of every single one of those references and had read them all. &mdash;  +++$+++ Hi, is it normal practice to remove lists of references ''en bloc''? That list was added to the article to demonstrate the references&mdash;as opposed to direct citations&mdash;used. I had made use of every single one of those references and had read them all. &mdash; [[User:BillC|BillC]]  <sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 16:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
525443 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525442 +++$+++ 525442 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.187567760E09 +++$+++ As [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28medicine-related_articles%29#Citing_medical_sources|MEDMOS]] states, \"It is not acceptable to write substantial amounts of prose and then add your medical textbook to the References section. It is too easy for a later editor to change the body text and then nobody is sure which statements are backed up by which sources.\" However, if you used those references, and can identify which specific statements are supported by them, then by all means put them back. -- +++$+++ :As [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28medicine-related_articles%29#Citing_medical_sources|MEDMOS]] states, "It is not acceptable to write substantial amounts of prose and then add your medical textbook to the References section. It is too easy for a later editor to change the body text and then nobody is sure which statements are backed up by which sources." However, if you used those references, and can identify which specific statements are supported by them, then by all means put them back. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 16:56, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
525444 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525442 +++$+++ 525443 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.187568060E09 +++$+++ [[WP:MEDMOS]] is a style guideline and not a policy, but thank you, I will do just that. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::[[WP:MEDMOS]] is a style guideline and not a policy, but thank you, I will do just that. &mdash; [[User:BillC|BillC]]  <sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 17:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

1155 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1155 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-12 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.239523860E09 +++$+++ You should make that an article or a list! I think, it would be quite useful  +++$+++ You should make that an article or a list! I think, it would be quite useful [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 01:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
1156 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1155 +++$+++ 1155 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.239524040E09 +++$+++ I think that is where I am headed with it. Just trying to flesh it out and see what it turns into. Feel free to make additions or provide comments as you see fit.  +++$+++ :I think that is where I am headed with it. Just trying to flesh it out and see what it turns into. Feel free to make additions or provide comments as you see fit. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 01:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
1157 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1155 +++$+++ 1156 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.239535080E09 +++$+++ No worries, will do! What about an example for each in an extra column, like ''DFC'' = [[DFC Prag]]? Anyway, Happy Easter from WA,  +++$+++ ::No worries, will do! What about an example for each in an extra column, like ''DFC'' = [[DFC Prag]]? Anyway, Happy Easter from WA, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 04:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
1158 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1155 +++$+++ 1157 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.239565740E09 +++$+++ I think as the thing moves along I'll end up adding some text that gives examples and some historical context in order to make it readable and provide some proper explanation. I can also maybe see a couple of separate tables, one for East German acronyms because that whole business has its own story and one for commonly used team nicknames (Eintracht, Borussia, Britannia, Hertha, Germania, etc.). In the meantime, if I can figure out how to reduce the size of the display text I'll try and make a column to take up your idea.  +++$+++ :::I think as the thing moves along I'll end up adding some text that gives examples and some historical context in order to make it readable and provide some proper explanation. I can also maybe see a couple of separate tables, one for East German acronyms because that whole business has its own story and one for commonly used team nicknames (Eintracht, Borussia, Britannia, Hertha, Germania, etc.). In the meantime, if I can figure out how to reduce the size of the display text I'll try and make a column to take up your idea. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 12:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

263300 +++$+++ UVnet +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263300 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-17 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.140164820E09 +++$+++ Don't you need to add it to [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]] so it can be discussed? -- +++$+++ Don't you need to add it to [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]] so it can be discussed? --[[User:UVnet|UVnet]] 00:27, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
263301 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263300 +++$+++ 263300 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.140172080E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Actually, I ''had'' added it to the page per the instructions [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems\/2006_February_16&diff=prev&oldid=39873314] ''before'' I left you your message. For some reason, all of the [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems\/2006 February 16|entires for Feb 16]] are not listed on that combined page... I'll try and see if I can fix it. If I can't, I'm sure someone will notice.  +++$+++ :Thanks. Actually, I ''had'' added it to the page per the instructions [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2006_February_16&diff=prev&oldid=39873314] ''before'' I left you your message. For some reason, all of the [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2006 February 16|entires for Feb 16]] are not listed on that combined page... I'll try and see if I can fix it. If I can't, I'm sure someone will notice. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 02:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
263302 +++$+++ UVnet +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263300 +++$+++ 263301 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.140213660E09 +++$+++ I don't understand why you and Carnildo can't tag images with [[Template:Fairusereview]] instead of ones that try to intiate it to be deleted ASAP. It's like you don't accept my opinion that I believe it to be fair use. -- +++$+++ ::I don't understand why you and Carnildo can't tag images with [[Template:Fairusereview]] instead of ones that try to intiate it to be deleted ASAP. It's like you don't accept my opinion that I believe it to be fair use. --[[User:UVnet|UVnet]] 14:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
263303 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263300 +++$+++ 263302 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.140219540E09 +++$+++ Because that means that yet another person has to do all the work in finding an appropriate tag and source. Most, if not all, fair use tags require a description and source. It is the responsibility of the uploader to provide these. This is made clear during the upload process. If the uploader fails to provide the relevant information, then it will be deleted.  +++$+++ :::Because that means that yet another person has to do all the work in finding an appropriate tag and source. Most, if not all, fair use tags require a description and source. It is the responsibility of the uploader to provide these. This is made clear during the upload process. If the uploader fails to provide the relevant information, then it will be deleted. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 15:39, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
263304 +++$+++ UVnet +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263300 +++$+++ 263303 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.140222060E09 +++$+++ You may delete the aforementioned image. I have uploaded a new one with better tagging and rational. You may review it. -- +++$+++ ::::You may delete the aforementioned image. I have uploaded a new one with better tagging and rational. You may review it. --[[User:UVnet|UVnet]] 16:21, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

525445 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-22 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.187783340E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] 04:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
525446 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525445 +++$+++ 525445 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.187783580E09 +++$+++ The content is from a public domain edition of [[Gray's Anatomy]], and marked with the [[Template:Gray's]] tag. I have removed the prompt from the page. -- +++$+++ :The content is from a public domain edition of [[Gray's Anatomy]], and marked with the [[Template:Gray's]] tag. I have removed the prompt from the page. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 04:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
525447 +++$+++ Coren +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525445 +++$+++ 525446 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.187784300E09 +++$+++ I've added the attribution tag to the list [[User:CorenSearchBot|CSBot]] knows about.  You should no longer get hits on that.  &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ ::I've added the attribution tag to the list [[User:CorenSearchBot|CSBot]] knows about.  You should no longer get hits on that.  &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 05:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
525448 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525445 +++$+++ 525447 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.187784420E09 +++$+++ Thank you. -- +++$+++ :::Thank you. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 05:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

1159 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-17 08:33:00 +++$+++ 1.239982380E09 +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, I'm looking for information on this club, [[Fidelitas Karlsruhe ]]. Does your clever book say anything? It was one of the 8 founding members of the Southern German football association in 1898 (see [[Southern German football championship#History|here]]), but its not on your list of [[Founding Clubs of the DFB]]. Any idea who it merged into in the Karlsruhe-football-club-merger-mess? I'm only after creating a redirect and, maybe, some information in the related club article. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, I'm looking for information on this club, [[Fidelitas Karlsruhe ]]. Does your clever book say anything? It was one of the 8 founding members of the Southern German football association in 1898 (see [[Southern German football championship#History|here]]), but its not on your list of [[Founding Clubs of the DFB]]. Any idea who it merged into in the Karlsruhe-football-club-merger-mess? I'm only after creating a redirect and, maybe, some information in the related club article. Thanks, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 08:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
1160 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1159 +++$+++ 1159 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.239990300E09 +++$+++ Sorry, there is no entry for it either as a team that played 4th tier or better or as a predecessor of any of the other Karlsruhe or M\xfchlburg sides listed in the book. :(  +++$+++ :Sorry, there is no entry for it either as a team that played 4th tier or better or as a predecessor of any of the other Karlsruhe or Mühlburg sides listed in the book. :( [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 10:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
1161 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1159 +++$+++ 1160 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.239990480E09 +++$+++ Bad luck. Well, not that importand, may just be another fact lost from that time, like so many. It will just have to stay a red-link for now. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::Bad luck. Well, not that importand, may just be another fact lost from that time, like so many. It will just have to stay a red-link for now. Thanks, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 10:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
1162 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1159 +++$+++ 1161 +++$+++ 2009-04-18 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.240043760E09 +++$+++ The German wikipedia says, the club is actually [[FC Frankonia Karlsruhe]]. That would make a lot more sense! By the way, I created [[:Category:Luftwaffe football clubs]] as there is now four articles you have created that qualify. Keep them club articles coming! Have fun,  +++$+++ :::The German wikipedia says, the club is actually [[FC Frankonia Karlsruhe]]. That would make a lot more sense! By the way, I created [[:Category:Luftwaffe football clubs]] as there is now four articles you have created that qualify. Keep them club articles coming! Have fun, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 01:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
1163 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1159 +++$+++ 1162 +++$+++ 2009-04-18 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.240045200E09 +++$+++ There's at least a dozen LSV sides yet to come, most of those just stubs though, as they were short-lived sides and only LSV Hamburg amounted to much as I recall, although there was a Stettin club that made several quarterfinal appearances. There's a small number of Wehrmacht and other military clubs as well.  +++$+++ ::::There's at least a dozen LSV sides yet to come, most of those just stubs though, as they were short-lived sides and only LSV Hamburg amounted to much as I recall, although there was a Stettin club that made several quarterfinal appearances. There's a small number of Wehrmacht and other military clubs as well. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 02:00, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

525449 +++$+++ IP4240207xx +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525449 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.187926620E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:IP4240207xx|IP4240207xx]] 20:37, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
525450 +++$+++ Flyguy649 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525449 +++$+++ 525449 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.187927100E09 +++$+++ Medial is toward the midline of the body, i.e. in the inside of the knee. Lateral is the outside of the knee. So the opposite of what you have above. --  +++$+++ :Medial is toward the midline of the body, i.e. in the inside of the knee. Lateral is the outside of the knee. So the opposite of what you have above. -- [[User:Flyguy649|Flyguy649]] [[User talk:Flyguy649|<sup>talk]]</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Flyguy649|<sub>contribs]]</sub> 20:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
525451 +++$+++ Flyguy649 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525449 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.187927940E09 +++$+++ I'll do it. Usually [[medial]] and [[lateral]] are linked, but I'll check. Thanks!  +++$+++ :::I'll do it. Usually [[medial]] and [[lateral]] are linked, but I'll check. Thanks! [[User:Flyguy649|Flyguy649]] [[User talk:Flyguy649|<sup>talk]]</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Flyguy649|<sub>contribs]]</sub> 20:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

263307 +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263307 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-24 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.140787500E09 +++$+++ You recently expressed interest in helping people with putting the correct copyright tags on their images.  I've created a page for people notified by OrphanBot to ask about image tagging: [[User talk:Carnildo\/images]].  If you could keep an eye on it and help answer questions, that would be appreciated. -- +++$+++ You recently expressed interest in helping people with putting the correct copyright tags on their images.  I've created a page for people notified by OrphanBot to ask about image tagging: [[User talk:Carnildo/images]].  If you could keep an eye on it and help answer questions, that would be appreciated. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] 05:25, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
263308 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263307 +++$+++ 263307 +++$+++ 2006-02-24 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.140804840E09 +++$+++ Errm, OK... glad you've finally got over it. It's only been ten and a half months.  +++$+++ :Errm, OK... glad you've finally got over it. It's only been ten and a half months. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 10:14, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

525452 +++$+++ CSDWarnBot +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-25 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.188075840E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information_icon.svg|left]]Hello, this is a message from [[User:CSDWarnBot|an automated bot]]. A tag has been placed on [[:Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy]], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|[[User:{{{nominator}}}|{{{nominator}}}]]&nbsp;([[User talk:{{{nominator}}}|talk]]&nbsp;'''\xb7''' [[Special:Contributions\/{{{nominator}}}|contribs]]),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy]] is a redirect to a non-existent page ([[WP:CSD#R1|CSD R1]]). <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting [[:Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy]], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}<\/nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. Feel free to contact the [[User:CSDWarnBot|bot operator]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.'''  +++$+++ [[Image:Information_icon.svg|left]]Hello, this is a message from [[User:CSDWarnBot|an automated bot]]. A tag has been placed on [[:Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy]], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|[[User:{{{nominator}}}|{{{nominator}}}]]&nbsp;([[User talk:{{{nominator}}}|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{{nominator}}}|contribs]]),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy]] is a redirect to a non-existent page ([[WP:CSD#R1|CSD R1]]). <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting [[:Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy]], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. Feel free to contact the [[User:CSDWarnBot|bot operator]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.''' [[User:CSDWarnBot|CSDWarnBot]] 14:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
525453 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525452 +++$+++ 525452 +++$+++ 2007-08-25 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.188079980E09 +++$+++ My only involvement with that page was to redirect \"Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy\" to \"Hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy\" on 18:07, 18 April 2007. Now that the lowercase version has been deleted, I certainly have no objection to the deletion of the uppercase version. -- +++$+++ :My only involvement with that page was to redirect "Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathy" to "Hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy" on 18:07, 18 April 2007. Now that the lowercase version has been deleted, I certainly have no objection to the deletion of the uppercase version. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 15:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

1165 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1165 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-20 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.240221480E09 +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, I'm wondering whether you are taking club requests right now but if you do, could you dig up this one: [[Berliner BC 03]]. It won the [[Brandenburg football championship]] in 1914 and finished runners-up in 1913 and 1915. It took part in the German Championship in 1914, narrowly going out to F\xfcrth in the semi-finals (4-3 aet). The German wikipedia has a [http:\/\/de.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Berliner_BC_03 little] on it but all traces seem lost after the 1920's. Its the only Berlin champion we don't have an article on as yet, it would be great if you could fill that little gap when you find time. Thanks and all the best,  +++$+++ Hey Wiggy, I'm wondering whether you are taking club requests right now but if you do, could you dig up this one: [[Berliner BC 03]]. It won the [[Brandenburg football championship]] in 1914 and finished runners-up in 1913 and 1915. It took part in the German Championship in 1914, narrowly going out to Fürth in the semi-finals (4-3 aet). The German wikipedia has a [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berliner_BC_03 little] on it but all traces seem lost after the 1920's. Its the only Berlin champion we don't have an article on as yet, it would be great if you could fill that little gap when you find time. Thanks and all the best, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 02:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
1166 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1165 +++$+++ 1165 +++$+++ 2009-04-20 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.240246740E09 +++$+++ This club here I think? [[BBC 03 Berlin]] Just needs a page move to get it to the proper name plus what ever other info we can attach.  +++$+++ :This club here I think? [[BBC 03 Berlin]] Just needs a page move to get it to the proper name plus what ever other info we can attach. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 09:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
1167 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1165 +++$+++ 1166 +++$+++ 2009-04-20 10:03:00 +++$+++ 1.240246980E09 +++$+++ I didn't look under ''Defunct'', only under ''Berlin football clubs''! Geeting old, somebody get me my pipe and slippers, please, and, maybe, a set of glasses!  I will create a redirect, no need for a move. Thanks for that.  +++$+++ ::I didn't look under ''Defunct'', only under ''Berlin football clubs''! Geeting old, somebody get me my pipe and slippers, please, and, maybe, a set of glasses!  I will create a redirect, no need for a move. Thanks for that. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 10:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

263310 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-09 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.141939920E09 +++$+++ If an image is not used in any articles, then feel free to mark it for deletion at [[WP:IFD]], with reason OR (orphaned).  +++$+++ If an image is not used in any articles, then feel free to mark it for deletion at [[WP:IFD]], with reason OR (orphaned). [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] 13:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
263311 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263310 +++$+++ 263310 +++$+++ 2006-03-09 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.141941420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your advice and message. Since we are both contributing positively to the project, I would have appreciated a slightly friendlier tone. I [[WP:AGF|assume]] that you did not mean to sound rude, but it is easy to misinterpret discourse without paralinguistic cues. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your advice and message. Since we are both contributing positively to the project, I would have appreciated a slightly friendlier tone. I [[WP:AGF|assume]] that you did not mean to sound rude, but it is easy to misinterpret discourse without paralinguistic cues. Cheers. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 13:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
263312 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263310 +++$+++ 263310 +++$+++ 2006-03-09 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.141941600E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I hope the above didn't cause any offence. You must know how disheartening it is, though, when you trawl through dozens of articles to correct various things, and the only feedback is about what you've done wrong.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I hope the above didn't cause any offence. You must know how disheartening it is, though, when you trawl through dozens of articles to correct various things, and the only feedback is about what you've done wrong. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 14:00, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
263313 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263310 +++$+++ 263312 +++$+++ 2006-03-09 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.141944300E09 +++$+++ Yes, it applies to both of us. Apologies for being blunt.  +++$+++ ::Yes, it applies to both of us. Apologies for being blunt. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] 14:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

525455 +++$+++  +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525455 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-26 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.188197100E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your contributions regarding sulfonamide antibacterials. [[User:Nenyedi|<span style=\"color:green\">'''Nen'''<\/span>]] +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your contributions regarding sulfonamide antibacterials. [[User:Nenyedi|<span style="color:green">'''Nen'''</span>]][[User:Nenyedi|<span style="color:orange">'''yedi'''</span>]] • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/Nenyedi|Deeds]]•[[:User talk:Nenyedi|Talk]])</sup> 23:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
525456 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525455 +++$+++ 525455 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.188197820E09 +++$+++ Thank you! -- +++$+++ :Thank you! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

1168 +++$+++ Neurolysis +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-30 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.241121540E09 +++$+++ Would you please explain [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File:RFC_Halley_Concordia.png&diff=287030234&oldid=287028851 this] edit? It is important to have that tag so that administrators can delete past revisions which are too large to comply with the [[WP:NFCC|NFCC]]. <font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"><b>\u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ Would you please explain [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:RFC_Halley_Concordia.png&diff=287030234&oldid=287028851 this] edit? It is important to have that tag so that administrators can delete past revisions which are too large to comply with the [[WP:NFCC|NFCC]]. <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>—&nbsp;[[User:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">neuro</font>]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">(talk)</font>]]</i></sup></font> 12:59, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
1169 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1168 +++$+++ 1168 +++$+++ 2009-04-30 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.241128860E09 +++$+++ Just trying to point the bot operator to a relevant discussion. I'll put the tag back as on looking a liitle closer at the series of edits he's not up to anything outrageous. Thx.  +++$+++ :Just trying to point the bot operator to a relevant discussion. I'll put the tag back as on looking a liitle closer at the series of edits he's not up to anything outrageous. Thx. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 15:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
1170 +++$+++ Neurolysis +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1168 +++$+++ 1169 +++$+++ 2009-04-30 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.241138280E09 +++$+++ I'm the bot operator, and I was the one that initiated that discussion. :\\ <font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"><b>\u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ ::I'm the bot operator, and I was the one that initiated that discussion. :\ <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>—&nbsp;[[User:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">neuro</font>]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">(talk)</font>]]</i></sup></font> 17:38, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
1171 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1168 +++$+++ 1170 +++$+++ 2009-04-30 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.241147820E09 +++$+++ Ah! You're aware then! Sorry, I've just seen so many bots doing the same thing, many of them obviously without a clue. So, out of curiosity, what is your bot using for a rule?  +++$+++ :::Ah! You're aware then! Sorry, I've just seen so many bots doing the same thing, many of them obviously without a clue. So, out of curiosity, what is your bot using for a rule? [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 20:17, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
1172 +++$+++ Neurolysis +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1168 +++$+++ 1171 +++$+++ 2009-04-30 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.241149320E09 +++$+++ It resizes to the closest it can to 0.25 megapixels and replaces the tag. After resizing it compresses with advcomp and optipng. :) <font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"><b>\u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ ::::It resizes to the closest it can to 0.25 megapixels and replaces the tag. After resizing it compresses with advcomp and optipng. :) <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>—&nbsp;[[User:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">neuro</font>]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">(talk)</font>]]</i></sup></font> 20:42, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

525457 +++$+++ Lara_bran +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-28 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.188297420E09 +++$+++ I could not figure out which section in [[Wikipedia talk:Navigational templates]], in regards to [[Template:Sex]]. Thanks for being considerate in keeping my preference, but still this generic has one problem. The gap between two lines(of list) of same group is wider in \"navbox generic\", this makes template look cluttered. Maybe we should find a place to discuss, maybe [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates]]? Thanks.  +++$+++ I could not figure out which section in [[Wikipedia talk:Navigational templates]], in regards to [[Template:Sex]]. Thanks for being considerate in keeping my preference, but still this generic has one problem. The gap between two lines(of list) of same group is wider in "navbox generic", this makes template look cluttered. Maybe we should find a place to discuss, maybe [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates]]? Thanks. [[User:Lara_bran|Lara_bran]] 03:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
525458 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525457 +++$+++ 525457 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.188303900E09 +++$+++ Sure, though [[Template talk:Navbox]] might be better -- the top gurus on the navbox standardization project seem to spend the most time there now (if you check the edit history, it's much more active than [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates]], so a post at the latter page wouldn't get much of a community response. You may also want to take a look at [[Template:Navbox_generic#Parameters]], to see some of the options which are available (you may be able to get what you want with a \"bodystyle  = line-height: 2.0;\" or something like that.) -- +++$+++ :Sure, though [[Template talk:Navbox]] might be better -- the top gurus on the navbox standardization project seem to spend the most time there now (if you check the edit history, it's much more active than [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates]], so a post at the latter page wouldn't get much of a community response. You may also want to take a look at [[Template:Navbox_generic#Parameters]], to see some of the options which are available (you may be able to get what you want with a "bodystyle  = line-height: 2.0;" or something like that.) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 05:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
525459 +++$+++ Lara_bran +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525457 +++$+++ 525458 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.188305640E09 +++$+++ Thanks, maybe i have to take up after a month or so. My view: Since new editors dont edit templates we can go for basic html codes, instead of generic templates, as for uniformity and conflicts some guideline should be enough. Anyway me cant invest much time currently. Me not editing anything further, bye.  +++$+++ ::Thanks, maybe i have to take up after a month or so. My view: Since new editors dont edit templates we can go for basic html codes, instead of generic templates, as for uniformity and conflicts some guideline should be enough. Anyway me cant invest much time currently. Me not editing anything further, bye. [[User:Lara_bran|Lara_bran]] 05:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
525460 +++$+++ Lara_bran +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525457 +++$+++ 525459 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.188390360E09 +++$+++ I meant, gap between two lines of same list should be less. Line gap between lines of 2 groups should be more. \"bodystyle  = line-height: 2.0;\" implies to all lines. Can i change it back with your permission?  +++$+++ :::I meant, gap between two lines of same list should be less. Line gap between lines of 2 groups should be more. "bodystyle  = line-height: 2.0;" implies to all lines. Can i change it back with your permission? [[User:Lara_bran|Lara_bran]] 05:26, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
525461 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525457 +++$+++ 525457 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.188459540E09 +++$+++ Please review [[Wikipedia:External_links#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest]] -- \"You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked.\" -- +++$+++ :Please review [[Wikipedia:External_links#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest]] -- "You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked." --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 00:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

263314 +++$+++ Kinopanorama widescreen +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-21 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.142937120E09 +++$+++ Contact me direct at kinopanorama@msn.com -- +++$+++ Contact me direct at kinopanorama@msn.com --[[User:Kinopanorama widescreen|Kinopanorama widescreen]] 02:32, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
263315 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263314 +++$+++ 263314 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.143063360E09 +++$+++ There is nothing to say other than what has been said on AfD. I'm not interested in corresponding on this issue. I have voted, and there appears to be a clear consensus against the article.  +++$+++ :There is nothing to say other than what has been said on AfD. I'm not interested in corresponding on this issue. I have voted, and there appears to be a clear consensus against the article. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 13:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

1173 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-01 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.241199060E09 +++$+++ If you have a look at my sandbox, you'll find [[User:Madcynic\/Sandbox\/Template:1. FC Magdeburg|this]]. For that template that I basically got from Chester City FC I still need an article on the history of the club - could you have a look at the [[de:1. FC Magdeburg]] article and tell me if you think that could be a basis for such an article? Thanks.  +++$+++ If you have a look at my sandbox, you'll find [[User:Madcynic/Sandbox/Template:1. FC Magdeburg|this]]. For that template that I basically got from Chester City FC I still need an article on the history of the club - could you have a look at the [[de:1. FC Magdeburg]] article and tell me if you think that could be a basis for such an article? Thanks. [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 10:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
1174 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1173 +++$+++ 1173 +++$+++ 2009-05-01 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.241200320E09 +++$+++ Wow. That's a pretty neat article. Lots of information and would probably help drive the creation of a bunch of German football related articles to support the wikilinks it contains. I think you've easily got what's needed there.  +++$+++ :Wow. That's a pretty neat article. Lots of information and would probably help drive the creation of a bunch of German football related articles to support the wikilinks it contains. I think you've easily got what's needed there. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 10:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

263318 +++$+++ Fourohfour +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-30 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.143755280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Fourohfour|Fourohfour]] 13:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
263319 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263318 +++$+++ 263318 +++$+++ 2006-03-30 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.143755700E09 +++$+++ Well, those ''Press Gang'' images (Frazz Davies) were uploaded at the beginning on February -- it's only now I've been able to tag them for deletion (I removed them from the article because they weren't eligible as fair use). As a media studies type person myself, though, my paranoid\/cynical hat suggests that he's being satirical...  +++$+++ :Well, those ''Press Gang'' images (Frazz Davies) were uploaded at the beginning on February -- it's only now I've been able to tag them for deletion (I removed them from the article because they weren't eligible as fair use). As a media studies type person myself, though, my paranoid/cynical hat suggests that he's being satirical... [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 13:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
263320 +++$+++ Fourohfour +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263318 +++$+++ 263319 +++$+++ 2006-03-30 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.143756060E09 +++$+++ Ah, yep. Sorry, I thought that all his\/her older work had been marked for removal, so assumed that this was in response to a new upload.  +++$+++ ::Ah, yep. Sorry, I thought that all his/her older work had been marked for removal, so assumed that this was in response to a new upload. [[User:Fourohfour|Fourohfour]] 14:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

1175 +++$+++ Lovibond +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1175 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-18 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.242657360E09 +++$+++ Hi, Wiggy! Love your contributions on German Football. I noticed you removed the link on the Wacker article to the vector version of the 1930s logo I produced, and blanked the image's page. I think I understand your rationale, that a vector version may not be eligible for fair use. I believe vector artwork is not automatically disqualified for fair use images, see, e.g., Image:Coca-Cola logo.svg, also in SVG. Does Wacker M\xfcnchen use this logo any more? I don't know if it's copyrighted; the Germans seem to rely on trademark protection for most logos (no copyright symbol on the Coca-Cola logo, but you do see \"schutzmark\" on it). If it has been disused, it may no longer be a trademark. (Notice I did not provide a vector version of the current logo.) Accordingly, I have restored the links and unblanked the vector version's page. I assume you will want to discuss this further...and I will check back here. Cheers!  +++$+++ Hi, Wiggy! Love your contributions on German Football. I noticed you removed the link on the Wacker article to the vector version of the 1930s logo I produced, and blanked the image's page. I think I understand your rationale, that a vector version may not be eligible for fair use. I believe vector artwork is not automatically disqualified for fair use images, see, e.g., Image:Coca-Cola logo.svg, also in SVG. Does Wacker München use this logo any more? I don't know if it's copyrighted; the Germans seem to rely on trademark protection for most logos (no copyright symbol on the Coca-Cola logo, but you do see "schutzmark" on it). If it has been disused, it may no longer be a trademark. (Notice I did not provide a vector version of the current logo.) Accordingly, I have restored the links and unblanked the vector version's page. I assume you will want to discuss this further...and I will check back here. Cheers! [[User:Lovibond|Lovibond]] ([[User talk:Lovibond|talk]]) 07:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
1176 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1175 +++$+++ 1175 +++$+++ 2009-05-18 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.242679560E09 +++$+++ <aside>Hey wow! I see you're a beer guy! Cool. I hang out at www.beeradvocate.com (as TerryW) where I write complimentary\/uncomplimentary things about the various beers I've tried. Now, that's no where near where you're at, but its really been a lot of fun learning how to drink beer. Tons of interesting styles and brews out there and that makes for an enjoyable \"hobby\". Even got my wife a little involved. Whenever we go somewhere I do a little research as to what's available to the neighbourhood so we can make a side trip and maybe have a tasty beer with lunch\/dinner. She's learning. The beer scene here in Ontario, Canada isn't quite as interesting or diverse as it is in the States, but has started to take off in the last 10 years or so as we're seeing changes in Provincial regulation that are allowing the emergence (finally) of craft breweries.  +++$+++ :<aside>Hey wow! I see you're a beer guy! Cool. I hang out at www.beeradvocate.com (as TerryW) where I write complimentary/uncomplimentary things about the various beers I've tried. Now, that's no where near where you're at, but its really been a lot of fun learning how to drink beer. Tons of interesting styles and brews out there and that makes for an enjoyable "hobby". Even got my wife a little involved. Whenever we go somewhere I do a little research as to what's available to the neighbourhood so we can make a side trip and maybe have a tasty beer with lunch/dinner. She's learning. The beer scene here in Ontario, Canada isn't quite as interesting or diverse as it is in the States, but has started to take off in the last 10 years or so as we're seeing changes in Provincial regulation that are allowing the emergence (finally) of craft breweries. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 13:46, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
1177 +++$+++ Lovibond +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1175 +++$+++ 1176 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.243053480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply. I do like reading about the lesser-known teams, and appreciate the efforts of those who create and maintain these articles. I see the football articles are edited by a group of people that includes some rather zealous types, and I think I understand a little better your perspective. So perhaps it might not be best to push that part of the envelope, as you put it, right now. Thanks again! Glad the craft beer scene is improving in Ontario, btw. Cheers!  +++$+++ :: Thanks for the reply. I do like reading about the lesser-known teams, and appreciate the efforts of those who create and maintain these articles. I see the football articles are edited by a group of people that includes some rather zealous types, and I think I understand a little better your perspective. So perhaps it might not be best to push that part of the envelope, as you put it, right now. Thanks again! Glad the craft beer scene is improving in Ontario, btw. Cheers! [[User:Lovibond|Lovibond]] ([[User talk:Lovibond|talk]]) 21:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

525465 +++$+++ Djma12 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525465 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-02 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.188723900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Djma12|Djma12]] <sup>([[User talk:Djma12|talk]])</sup> 02:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
525466 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525465 +++$+++ 525465 +++$+++ 2007-09-02 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.188738660E09 +++$+++ It does put things in perspective, doesn't it? -- +++$+++ :It does put things in perspective, doesn't it? --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 06:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
525467 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525465 +++$+++ 525465 +++$+++ 2007-09-02 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.188738600E09 +++$+++ It's hard to tell -- http:\/\/www.qtdrugs.org\/ seems to have some association with [[University of Arizona]] and [[Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality]], which is a plus. It's good that named doctors are associated with the site, but bad that the doctors aren't associated with specific statements made on the site, so they don't have the accountability we would want from a reliable source. It seems like a marginal source; however, the article for [[Clobutinol]] is in such a rudimentary state that a marginal source is better than no source. It's probably okay to use qtdrugs, but if I were you, I'd try to find better sources from [[PubMed]] if I could. -- +++$+++ :It's hard to tell -- http://www.qtdrugs.org/ seems to have some association with [[University of Arizona]] and [[Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality]], which is a plus. It's good that named doctors are associated with the site, but bad that the doctors aren't associated with specific statements made on the site, so they don't have the accountability we would want from a reliable source. It seems like a marginal source; however, the article for [[Clobutinol]] is in such a rudimentary state that a marginal source is better than no source. It's probably okay to use qtdrugs, but if I were you, I'd try to find better sources from [[PubMed]] if I could. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 06:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

263323 +++$+++ Bduke +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263323 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-04 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.144214160E09 +++$+++ I note you fixed a link in this article from Newcastle to Newcastle upon Tyne. Have you any evidence that it is Newcastle upon Tyne, not Newcastle under Lyme. I have done an extensive Google search and found nothing to verify the details of his life as set out in this article. I have added that he was an MP and details of his birth, death, father, succession etc., but nothing about his life story seemed verified. Can you help? -- +++$+++ I note you fixed a link in this article from Newcastle to Newcastle upon Tyne. Have you any evidence that it is Newcastle upon Tyne, not Newcastle under Lyme. I have done an extensive Google search and found nothing to verify the details of his life as set out in this article. I have added that he was an MP and details of his birth, death, father, succession etc., but nothing about his life story seemed verified. Can you help? --[[User:Bduke|Bduke]] 22:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
263324 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263323 +++$+++ 263323 +++$+++ 2006-04-04 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.144216920E09 +++$+++ Well, Newcastle under Lyme isn't a city -- Newcastle upon Tyne is. Since the noun is preceded by \"the city of\", cohesion suggests that it is Tyne? I was concerned with DABbing Newcastle (accurately, hopefully, of course), rather than researching this specific subject, so I'm afraid I can't help you further in verifying the bio. Good luck.  +++$+++ :Well, Newcastle under Lyme isn't a city -- Newcastle upon Tyne is. Since the noun is preceded by "the city of", cohesion suggests that it is Tyne? I was concerned with DABbing Newcastle (accurately, hopefully, of course), rather than researching this specific subject, so I'm afraid I can't help you further in verifying the bio. Good luck. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 23:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

1180 +++$+++ OdinFK +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-09 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.244586480E09 +++$+++ Thanks again,  +++$+++ Thanks again, [[User:OdinFK|OdinFK]] ([[User talk:OdinFK|talk]]) 15:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
1181 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1180 +++$+++ 1180 +++$+++ 2009-06-09 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.244588640E09 +++$+++ Had a spare moment, so made a barnstar for the project. Hot off the press, so to speak. Enjoy!  +++$+++ :Had a spare moment, so made a barnstar for the project. Hot off the press, so to speak. Enjoy! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 16:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
1182 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1180 +++$+++ 1181 +++$+++ 2009-06-09 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.244594820E09 +++$+++ Thanks from me too. :-)  +++$+++ ::Thanks from me too. :-) [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 17:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
1183 +++$+++ Hubschrauber729 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1180 +++$+++ 1182 +++$+++ 2009-06-09 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.244596260E09 +++$+++ My first Barnstar too, Thanks!  +++$+++ :::My first Barnstar too, Thanks! [[User:Hubschrauber729|Hubschrauber729]] ([[User talk:Hubschrauber729|talk]]) 18:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

263326 +++$+++ Elcondor +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-06 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.144375980E09 +++$+++ Just checked with the Channel 4 Press Office, they insist on keeping their promotional images for the UK media only, which doesn't include US-based Wikipedia. I *have* found a fair-use drawing of the logo from Endemol West (which they've been offering to any DOND site under fair-use). Is it safe to replace the image in the affected pages?  +++$+++ Just checked with the Channel 4 Press Office, they insist on keeping their promotional images for the UK media only, which doesn't include US-based Wikipedia. I *have* found a fair-use drawing of the logo from Endemol West (which they've been offering to any DOND site under fair-use). Is it safe to replace the image in the affected pages? [[User:Elcondor|Elcondor]] 19:13, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
263327 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263326 +++$+++ 263326 +++$+++ 2006-04-06 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.144376160E09 +++$+++ Logos tend to be much safer than photographs, yes. Tag it with {{tl|tv-program-logo}}.  +++$+++ :Logos tend to be much safer than photographs, yes. Tag it with {{tl|tv-program-logo}}. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 19:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

262341 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-09 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.294587960E09 +++$+++ Hi Dana. I realise you are probably very busy since we elected you  to the dizzy  height of admin, and that  your work  may  have shifted focus, but I'm wondering if you would be interested in doing  another GA review for the Wikiproject Worcestershire. You did a wonderful, but mercilessly strict review on [[Malvern, Worcestershire]], maybe you could take a look at an article we have nominated a long time ago. Short and sweet, but may still have some minor issues, the article is [[Evesham]]. Best wishes for 2011, -- +++$+++ Hi Dana. I realise you are probably very busy since we elected you  to the dizzy  height of admin, and that  your work  may  have shifted focus, but I'm wondering if you would be interested in doing  another GA review for the Wikiproject Worcestershire. You did a wonderful, but mercilessly strict review on [[Malvern, Worcestershire]], maybe you could take a look at an article we have nominated a long time ago. Short and sweet, but may still have some minor issues, the article is [[Evesham]]. Best wishes for 2011, --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 07:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
262342 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262341 +++$+++ 262341 +++$+++ 2011-01-12 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.294866060E09 +++$+++ Hi Dana, thanks for having taken this on. We really appreciate it. I'll just point out that there was more to that 'dismissive', but nevertheless polite comment, than meets the eye. I and other editors and admins have, or have had issues elsewhere that may not be resolved. Best regards, -- +++$+++ :Hi Dana, thanks for having taken this on. We really appreciate it. I'll just point out that there was more to that 'dismissive', but nevertheless polite comment, than meets the eye. I and other editors and admins have, or have had issues elsewhere that may not be resolved. Best regards, --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 13:01, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

263328 +++$+++ TimPope +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-06 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.144381440E09 +++$+++ Are all the links to your website all dead now? I saw on the front page the site is closed and all content moved to wikipedia. If so I'll remove any links I see such as the one on [[T-Bag]]. Thanks,  +++$+++ Are all the links to your website all dead now? I saw on the front page the site is closed and all content moved to wikipedia. If so I'll remove any links I see such as the one on [[T-Bag]]. Thanks, [[User:TimPope|Tim]] ([[User talk:TimPope|meep]]) 20:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
263329 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263328 +++$+++ 263328 +++$+++ 2006-04-06 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.144383120E09 +++$+++ Mmm...  I had closed the themes site, but I'd kept the T-Bag page up. For some reason its redirecting to theme''z''. Anyway, yeah, just delete it for now. Without the themes (boo to the MCPS), a link to Jeremy's site is sufficient. There shouldn't be any other links to my site on wikipedia now anyway.  +++$+++ :Mmm...  I had closed the themes site, but I'd kept the T-Bag page up. For some reason its redirecting to theme''z''. Anyway, yeah, just delete it for now. Without the themes (boo to the MCPS), a link to Jeremy's site is sufficient. There shouldn't be any other links to my site on wikipedia now anyway. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 21:12, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
263330 +++$+++ TimPope +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263328 +++$+++ 263329 +++$+++ 2006-04-06 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.144383960E09 +++$+++ OK. It can always be re-added at later date.  +++$+++ ::OK. It can always be re-added at later date. [[User:TimPope|Tim]] ([[User talk:TimPope|meep]]) 21:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

525473 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-04 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.188956220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification, much obliged.   +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification, much obliged.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] 18:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
525474 +++$+++ Greg Kuperberg +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525473 +++$+++ 525473 +++$+++ 2007-09-05 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.188981060E09 +++$+++ Actually, \"tendonitis\" loses by a small margin in PubMed; and, more importantly, it would lose by a wide margin if not for automatic keywording.  Try \"tendinitis site:nih.gov\" versus \"tendonitis site:nih.gov\", for example.  So as the tendonitis page itself said (paradoxically), tendinitis is the preferred spelling among professionals.  +++$+++ :Actually, "tendonitis" loses by a small margin in PubMed; and, more importantly, it would lose by a wide margin if not for automatic keywording.  Try "tendinitis site:nih.gov" versus "tendonitis site:nih.gov", for example.  So as the tendonitis page itself said (paradoxically), tendinitis is the preferred spelling among professionals. [[User:Greg Kuperberg|Greg Kuperberg]] 01:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

263331 +++$+++ Sumthingweird +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-08 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.144523220E09 +++$+++ Hi JPS, thanks for the changes to my userpage, half of which were helpful. However, the auto-capitalising of Newcastle in Uni-of-newcastle-crest-150.png caused a minor problem as well as in the webpage http:\/\/newcastle.esperanto.org.au. Not a big problem to fix, but just so you know for future automated fixups. -- +++$+++ Hi JPS, thanks for the changes to my userpage, half of which were helpful. However, the auto-capitalising of Newcastle in Uni-of-newcastle-crest-150.png caused a minor problem as well as in the webpage http://newcastle.esperanto.org.au. Not a big problem to fix, but just so you know for future automated fixups. --[[User:Sumthingweird|Sumthingweird]] 12:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
263332 +++$+++ Sumthingweird +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263331 +++$+++ 263331 +++$+++ 2006-04-09 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.144599960E09 +++$+++ Lol, no worries ;-)-- +++$+++ :Lol, no worries ;-)--[[User:Sumthingweird|Sumthingweird]] 09:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

1188 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1188 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-13 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.244924100E09 +++$+++ The club have decided to create a new (ugly) logo to be used from the next season onwards, as they have sold off the rights to use their current logo a few years ago and apparently are unwilling to pay licence fees. If you could be so kind as to incorporate that in due time... [http:\/\/www.berlinerfcdynamo.com\/index.php?main=show_news&id=547 Here it is].  +++$+++ The club have decided to create a new (ugly) logo to be used from the next season onwards, as they have sold off the rights to use their current logo a few years ago and apparently are unwilling to pay licence fees. If you could be so kind as to incorporate that in due time... [http://www.berlinerfcdynamo.com/index.php?main=show_news&id=547 Here it is]. [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 13:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
1189 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1188 +++$+++ 1188 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.244929920E09 +++$+++ Too bad they couldn't work it out to hang onto the old. Thanks for the news. I'll add it in a bit.  +++$+++ :Too bad they couldn't work it out to hang onto the old. Thanks for the news. I'll add it in a bit. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 14:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
1190 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1188 +++$+++ 1189 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.244931600E09 +++$+++ [[User:Steschke|ST]] [[:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Steschke|\u25cb]] provided a clean logo on the talk page. Cool.  +++$+++ ::[[User:Steschke|ST]] [[:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Steschke|○]] provided a clean logo on the talk page. Cool. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 15:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

263333 +++$+++ Flowerparty +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-11 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.144802520E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'm assume this was accidental, but you removed a references section while stub sorting [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rob_da_Bank&diff=47975498&oldid=46636635 here]. Does AWB do this automatically? You might want to look out for that anyway.  +++$+++ Hi. I'm assume this was accidental, but you removed a references section while stub sorting [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rob_da_Bank&diff=47975498&oldid=46636635 here]. Does AWB do this automatically? You might want to look out for that anyway. [[User:Flowerparty|Flower]][[User talk:Flowerparty|party<font color="e7ef96">?</font>]] 17:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
263334 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263333 +++$+++ 263333 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.144802700E09 +++$+++ Eek, responsibility for that gaffe rests with me, not AWB. Thanks for pointing it out.  +++$+++ :Eek, responsibility for that gaffe rests with me, not AWB. Thanks for pointing it out. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 17:45, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
263335 +++$+++ Flowerparty +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263333 +++$+++ 263334 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.144802820E09 +++$+++ Ok, no problem. Keep up the good work!  +++$+++ ::Ok, no problem. Keep up the good work! [[User:Flowerparty|Flower]][[User talk:Flowerparty|party<font color="e7ef96">?</font>]] 17:47, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

1191 +++$+++ Pgallert +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1191 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-15 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.245095040E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Pgallert|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert|talk]]) 12:44, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
1192 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1191 +++$+++ 1191 +++$+++ 2009-06-15 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.245098640E09 +++$+++ I removed the tag, under [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football\/Notability]] it is noteable.  +++$+++ :I removed the tag, under [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability]] it is noteable. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 13:44, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

263336 +++$+++ Gungadin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263336 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-14 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.145042280E09 +++$+++ I was not aware i was using unfree image, this was not done on purpose on my part. The other warnings I have received were about promotional photos not screen shots, which it seems everyone else but me is allowed to upload without scrutiny. I will refrain from uploading anymore images from now on.It was not my intention to cuse problems  +++$+++ I was not aware i was using unfree image, this was not done on purpose on my part. The other warnings I have received were about promotional photos not screen shots, which it seems everyone else but me is allowed to upload without scrutiny. I will refrain from uploading anymore images from now on.It was not my intention to cuse problems [[User:Gungadin|Gungadin]] 12:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
263337 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263336 +++$+++ 263336 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.145045820E09 +++$+++ Oh, and if you see any similar photos uploaded by others that you think shouldn't be there, let me know. I'm assessing them in batches by uploader...  +++$+++ :Oh, and if you see any similar photos uploaded by others that you think shouldn't be there, let me know. I'm assessing them in batches by uploader... [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 13:17, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

1193 +++$+++ Nehrams2020 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-22 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.245665040E09 +++$+++ Generally, I make sure that at least one dimension is 300-400px in size. Sometimes it needs to be smaller depending on the type of image (such as a logo, poster, or picture of a person). I look at each image differently since sometimes small text is included in an image which is part of the reason the image is being used. If I question whether the size is sufficient or not, I visit the article and see what impact the size makes. For many of the images being reduced, they're located in infoboxes are already half the size anyway. At WP:FILM we developed our guidelines to state that one of the image's dimensions should be 300px or smaller. This usually covers DVD covers, movie posters, and screenshots. For the most part, this size allows for viewing most of the details of the image (and readers can visit the source link to see a larger size if necessary). Let me know if this doesn't answer your question. --Happy editing!  +++$+++ Generally, I make sure that at least one dimension is 300-400px in size. Sometimes it needs to be smaller depending on the type of image (such as a logo, poster, or picture of a person). I look at each image differently since sometimes small text is included in an image which is part of the reason the image is being used. If I question whether the size is sufficient or not, I visit the article and see what impact the size makes. For many of the images being reduced, they're located in infoboxes are already half the size anyway. At WP:FILM we developed our guidelines to state that one of the image's dimensions should be 300px or smaller. This usually covers DVD covers, movie posters, and screenshots. For the most part, this size allows for viewing most of the details of the image (and readers can visit the source link to see a larger size if necessary). Let me know if this doesn't answer your question. --Happy editing! [[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nehrams2020|contrib]]) 03:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
1194 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1193 +++$+++ 1193 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.245665760E09 +++$+++ It helps. However you might want to have a read at the link I posted and the flow of the discussion there which included parameters based on megapixels (1-1.2) rather than a single 300px dimension. Its a more flexible approach that works for images that arent quite square. I have no trouble with most of what you have done but (fair warning given) will probably go back and resize some of the stuff that includes multiple images, typically where there are historical logos displayed. They don't have to be huge, but they don't need to be quite so small either.  +++$+++ :It helps. However you might want to have a read at the link I posted and the flow of the discussion there which included parameters based on megapixels (1-1.2) rather than a single 300px dimension. Its a more flexible approach that works for images that arent quite square. I have no trouble with most of what you have done but (fair warning given) will probably go back and resize some of the stuff that includes multiple images, typically where there are historical logos displayed. They don't have to be huge, but they don't need to be quite so small either. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 03:16, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
1195 +++$+++ Nehrams2020 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1193 +++$+++ 1194 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.245678780E09 +++$+++ Yes there are definitely some that could be a little larger, and as long as you feel it's reasonable, then it likely won't be a problem. Many images have to be taken with a grain of salt, but for the vast majority of the 700 or so images I looked at today, most were consistent in the sizes. --Happy editing!  +++$+++ ::Yes there are definitely some that could be a little larger, and as long as you feel it's reasonable, then it likely won't be a problem. Many images have to be taken with a grain of salt, but for the vast majority of the 700 or so images I looked at today, most were consistent in the sizes. --Happy editing! [[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nehrams2020|contrib]]) 06:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
1196 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1193 +++$+++ 1195 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.245695400E09 +++$+++ Okay, tanks for the reply. Happy editing to you, too.  +++$+++ :::Okay, tanks for the reply. Happy editing to you, too. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 11:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

263338 +++$+++ Gungadin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263338 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-14 12:56:00 +++$+++ 1.145044560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Gungadin|Gungadin]] 12:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
263339 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263338 +++$+++ 263338 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.145044860E09 +++$+++ I went through all of your images (taking me nearly an hour) and assessed them. Most of them were photographs, not screenshots. If they were from a programme about EastEnders, then your source information was inaccurate -- it should have cited the exact source (i.e. the title of the programmes you have used). I still don't think you can use them, unfortunately.  +++$+++ :I went through all of your images (taking me nearly an hour) and assessed them. Most of them were photographs, not screenshots. If they were from a programme about EastEnders, then your source information was inaccurate -- it should have cited the exact source (i.e. the title of the programmes you have used). I still don't think you can use them, unfortunately. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 13:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
263340 +++$+++ Feydey +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263338 +++$+++ 263338 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.145054460E09 +++$+++ I have to concur with JPS in this matter, promotional photographs shouldn't be uploaded with the screenshot licence (they have no episode info etc.). P.S. thanks JPS for reverting vandalism on my user page.  +++$+++ :I have to concur with JPS in this matter, promotional photographs shouldn't be uploaded with the screenshot licence (they have no episode info etc.). P.S. thanks JPS for reverting vandalism on my user page. [[User:Feydey|feydey]] 15:41, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

1197 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1197 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-22 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.245666660E09 +++$+++ Good to see you back! Have you noted this article, [[RB Leipzig]]? Sounds interessting. Needs some more work, too. Hope you are having a great summer,  +++$+++ Good to see you back! Have you noted this article, [[RB Leipzig]]? Sounds interessting. Needs some more work, too. Hope you are having a great summer, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 03:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
1198 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1197 +++$+++ 1197 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.245695400E09 +++$+++ Summer is late arriving here to my part of Canada! On May 31 I had to wear a touque all day while working outside and we had several episodes of ice pellets falling in the afternoon. The next day was shirtsleeve weather. Finally nice out now and we're up for some proper summer weather. Thanks for the note.  +++$+++ :Summer is late arriving here to my part of Canada! On May 31 I had to wear a touque all day while working outside and we had several episodes of ice pellets falling in the afternoon. The next day was shirtsleeve weather. Finally nice out now and we're up for some proper summer weather. Thanks for the note. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 11:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
1199 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1197 +++$+++ 1198 +++$+++ 2009-06-23 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.245740640E09 +++$+++ I wonder, how far RB Leipzig will make it. East German football could use a competitive club, especially now that no club from there plays in the Bundesliga any more. I just wonder how well accepted the club will be in Leipzig, the supporters there are pretty fanatic about Lok and FC Sachsen, not much room for another club. But the possibility exists that this might be the begining of an article of a future Bundesliga club, given time. Worth watching, I think.  +++$+++ ::I wonder, how far RB Leipzig will make it. East German football could use a competitive club, especially now that no club from there plays in the Bundesliga any more. I just wonder how well accepted the club will be in Leipzig, the supporters there are pretty fanatic about Lok and FC Sachsen, not much room for another club. But the possibility exists that this might be the begining of an article of a future Bundesliga club, given time. Worth watching, I think. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:04, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
1200 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1197 +++$+++ 1199 +++$+++ 2009-06-24 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.245829980E09 +++$+++ East German football might need a competitive club, but not from this glass tube idiocy that is RBL. As you already pointed out, the city of Leipzig has a rich history in terms of football, and this is just not...right. Red Bull and their American style of producing events (no offense meant) instead of sports can go f themselves, if it was up to me. Unfortunately, it is not up to me and therefore you can expect RBL in Bundesliga 2 by 2014, unless something very very bad (from RBL pov) happens.  +++$+++ :::East German football might need a competitive club, but not from this glass tube idiocy that is RBL. As you already pointed out, the city of Leipzig has a rich history in terms of football, and this is just not...right. Red Bull and their American style of producing events (no offense meant) instead of sports can go f themselves, if it was up to me. Unfortunately, it is not up to me and therefore you can expect RBL in Bundesliga 2 by 2014, unless something very very bad (from RBL pov) happens. [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 00:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
1201 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1197 +++$+++ 1200 +++$+++ 2009-06-24 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.245839340E09 +++$+++ Well this'll make it all double fun to watch then. Things don't always go as planned when you try to buy your way to the top and maybe they'll crash and burn. I'd tend to agree that the marketing hype around this type of approach sours stuff a bit - doesn't make the whole thing seem genuine somehow. But on the other hand maybe it'll set a fire under some of the eastern clubs. Its pretty embarassing the way things are right now. Time now to sit back and watch it all unfold ...  +++$+++ ::::Well this'll make it all double fun to watch then. Things don't always go as planned when you try to buy your way to the top and maybe they'll crash and burn. I'd tend to agree that the marketing hype around this type of approach sours stuff a bit - doesn't make the whole thing seem genuine somehow. But on the other hand maybe it'll set a fire under some of the eastern clubs. Its pretty embarassing the way things are right now. Time now to sit back and watch it all unfold ... [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 03:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
1202 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1197 +++$+++ 1201 +++$+++ 2009-06-24 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.245882660E09 +++$+++ If it does set a fire, I'm pretty sure a number of clubs will get burnt, if they try to compete with the cash...  +++$+++ :::::If it does set a fire, I'm pretty sure a number of clubs will get burnt, if they try to compete with the cash... [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 15:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

263344 +++$+++ Gungadin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263344 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-15 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.145150580E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Gungadin|Gungadin]] 18:23, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
263345 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263344 +++$+++ 263344 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.145162880E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'm unsure -- it could be a screenshot that has been cropped, or it could be a publicity photo. The quality and the framing suggests that it could be a photo, but I'm happy to give it the benefit of the doubt now that you've expanded the source.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I'm unsure -- it could be a screenshot that has been cropped, or it could be a publicity photo. The quality and the framing suggests that it could be a photo, but I'm happy to give it the benefit of the doubt now that you've expanded the source. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 21:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

263346 +++$+++ Judge Ian Huntley +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-15 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.145152740E09 +++$+++ Lines to be with me by Monday. Copying and pasting is '''not''' acceptable.  +++$+++ Lines to be with me by Monday. Copying and pasting is '''not''' acceptable. [[User:Judge Ian Huntley|Judge Ian Huntley]] 18:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
263347 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263346 +++$+++ 263346 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.145162580E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Judge, but my intention with the {{tl|unreferenced}} tag was that those references might perhaps be more appropriate on the article itself, and not my talk page?  +++$+++ :Thanks, Judge, but my intention with the {{tl|unreferenced}} tag was that those references might perhaps be more appropriate on the article itself, and not my talk page? [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 21:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
263348 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263346 +++$+++ 263346 +++$+++ 2006-04-16 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.145237220E09 +++$+++ Some of your images can be used as fair use, but most can't, I'm afraid. The tag clearly says that promophotos must come a press kit. Your source is not a press kit.  +++$+++ :Some of your images can be used as fair use, but most can't, I'm afraid. The tag clearly says that promophotos must come a press kit. Your source is not a press kit. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 18:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
263349 +++$+++ Sweetiepetie +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263346 +++$+++ 263348 +++$+++ 2006-04-16 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.145239860E09 +++$+++ What exactly is a press kit anyway?  +++$+++ ::What exactly is a press kit anyway? [[User:Sweetiepetie|Sweetie Petie]] 19:11, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
263350 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263346 +++$+++ 263349 +++$+++ 2006-04-16 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.145240100E09 +++$+++ Take a look at [[press kit]]. It is a selection of media (photos, sounds, video clips, etc.) explicitly licensed for reproduction in other media. These days, press kits are often released in electronic form, either as a CD\/DVD, or on a website '''clearly''' labelled as such.  +++$+++ :::Take a look at [[press kit]]. It is a selection of media (photos, sounds, video clips, etc.) explicitly licensed for reproduction in other media. These days, press kits are often released in electronic form, either as a CD/DVD, or on a website '''clearly''' labelled as such. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 19:15, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
263351 +++$+++ Sweetiepetie +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263346 +++$+++ 263350 +++$+++ 2006-04-18 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.145395980E09 +++$+++ Finding images for Wikipedia is hard :(  +++$+++ ::::Finding images for Wikipedia is hard :( [[User:Sweetiepetie|Sweetie Petie]] 14:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

1203 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-25 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.245917640E09 +++$+++ I added a '''Criticism''' section to the article but new club seems to be well received within the town, from what I can see.  +++$+++ I added a '''Criticism''' section to the article but new club seems to be well received within the town, from what I can see. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 01:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
1204 +++$+++ Ryan Postlethwaite +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-26 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.246008480E09 +++$+++ ''For the Mediation Committee,'' ''' +++$+++ ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' '''[[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|<font color="green">Ryan</font> <font color="purple">Postlethwaite</font>]]''' 02:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

1205 +++$+++ 145.228.61.4 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-06 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.246898460E09 +++$+++ I've got a problem with the [[SC Verl]] article, more specifically the squad template in use. How can I add ''two'' flags for players with dual nationality? I've got no idea where \/ whom to ask, so I \"defaulted\" to you, oh guru of soccer pages! :-) -- [[Special:Contributions\/145.228.61.4|145.228.61.4]] ( +++$+++ I've got a problem with the [[SC Verl]] article, more specifically the squad template in use. How can I add ''two'' flags for players with dual nationality? I've got no idea where / whom to ask, so I "defaulted" to you, oh guru of soccer pages! :-) -- [[Special:Contributions/145.228.61.4|145.228.61.4]] ([[User talk:145.228.61.4|talk]]) 09:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
1206 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1205 +++$+++ 1205 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.246905300E09 +++$+++ Off the top of my head, I'm not sure you can. There has been repeated discussion over at the [[:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football|football project]] page about the use of flags and I have some sort of recollection that the use of two flags is frowned upon. I'll see if I can find a reference in the discussion archive - or you might ask the question there.  +++$+++ :Off the top of my head, I'm not sure you can. There has been repeated discussion over at the [[:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football|football project]] page about the use of flags and I have some sort of recollection that the use of two flags is frowned upon. I'll see if I can find a reference in the discussion archive - or you might ask the question there. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 11:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
1207 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1205 +++$+++ 1206 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.246905780E09 +++$+++ Okay, a quick search of the discussion archive using the terms ''nationality'' and ''flag'' provides several references. WikiProject_Football\/Archive_27#Country_flags_for_players_of_dual_nationality looks to be relevant and includes related manual of style info. Hope that helps steer you in the right direction.  +++$+++ ::Okay, a quick search of the discussion archive using the terms ''nationality'' and ''flag'' provides several references. WikiProject_Football/Archive_27#Country_flags_for_players_of_dual_nationality looks to be relevant and includes related manual of style info. Hope that helps steer you in the right direction. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 11:43, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

524489 +++$+++ Walton One +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524489 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.191898020E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to clear something up re Ryulong and [[User:Walter Humala]]. The trouble with block logs is that they give the blocking admin's opinion, not the whole story. The alleged \"hate joke\", IIRC, was when he replaced the <nowiki><!--End of MfD message...<\/nowiki> with <nowiki><!--End of \"nazi\" message...<\/nowiki> on an MfD notice on ''his own userpage'', after Ryulong had nominated almost all of his userpages for deletion (again, for no apparent reason). If blocking users for making one edit to their own userpage is considered proper admin conduct, then evidently I'm far too lenient to be an admin. :-) To be fair, though, this was the only time I'd encountered Ryulong, so I won't assume this to be a typical example of his use of the tools. But his treatment of Walter Humala was overly trigger-happy, IMO - while I understand he was acting in complete good faith, admins have an important responsibility to be kind to \"borderline\" users, and to guide them in the direction of productive editing rather than driving them away.  +++$+++ I just wanted to clear something up re Ryulong and [[User:Walter Humala]]. The trouble with block logs is that they give the blocking admin's opinion, not the whole story. The alleged "hate joke", IIRC, was when he replaced the <nowiki><!--End of MfD message...</nowiki> with <nowiki><!--End of "nazi" message...</nowiki> on an MfD notice on ''his own userpage'', after Ryulong had nominated almost all of his userpages for deletion (again, for no apparent reason). If blocking users for making one edit to their own userpage is considered proper admin conduct, then evidently I'm far too lenient to be an admin. :-) To be fair, though, this was the only time I'd encountered Ryulong, so I won't assume this to be a typical example of his use of the tools. But his treatment of Walter Humala was overly trigger-happy, IMO - while I understand he was acting in complete good faith, admins have an important responsibility to be kind to "borderline" users, and to guide them in the direction of productive editing rather than driving them away. [[User:Walton One|Walton]]<sup>[[User talk:Walton One|One]]</sup> 19:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
524490 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524489 +++$+++ 524489 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.191899820E09 +++$+++ {butting in) I made a short comment at the RfC, but Ryulong is probably one of the worst possible examples you can point to. I've never seen a more trigger-happy admin (look at my block log).  +++$+++ :{butting in) I made a short comment at the RfC, but Ryulong is probably one of the worst possible examples you can point to. I've never seen a more trigger-happy admin (look at my block log). [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 20:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
524491 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524489 +++$+++ 524490 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.191965880E09 +++$+++ Heh, you have clashed with him, haven't you? VO's block log would have been a better argument against Ryulong, yes: two consecutive blocks, each ending in an apology for mistaken identity or mistaken time stamps, is not good. But I stand by the comment about Ryu's block of Walter Humala being fully justified, and possibly mild. When someone nominates Miscellany for Deletion itself for deletion at Miscellany for Deletion, they are being disruptive, ''at best'' out of an effort to make a joke; and when this comes after a history of 8 other blocks, by different admins, several for disruption, I am not going to insist any admins assume good faith. -- +++$+++ :: Heh, you have clashed with him, haven't you? VO's block log would have been a better argument against Ryulong, yes: two consecutive blocks, each ending in an apology for mistaken identity or mistaken time stamps, is not good. But I stand by the comment about Ryu's block of Walter Humala being fully justified, and possibly mild. When someone nominates Miscellany for Deletion itself for deletion at Miscellany for Deletion, they are being disruptive, ''at best'' out of an effort to make a joke; and when this comes after a history of 8 other blocks, by different admins, several for disruption, I am not going to insist any admins assume good faith. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

1209 +++$+++ Auntieruth55 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-06 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.246912080E09 +++$+++ Wiggy, how did you know I needed that?  THANKS.  I'll see if it will pass muster with the powers who are. :)  -- +++$+++ Wiggy, how did you know I needed that?  THANKS.  I'll see if it will pass muster with the powers who are. :)  --[[User:Auntieruth55|Auntieruth55]] ([[User talk:Auntieruth55|talk]]) 13:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
1210 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1209 +++$+++ 1209 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.246922880E09 +++$+++ I keep half an eye on Project Germany stuff (and am concerned also about image bashers). Your original is a great map in comparison to the others and just needs\/needed a few tweaks. My pleasure to help.  +++$+++ :I keep half an eye on Project Germany stuff (and am concerned also about image bashers). Your original is a great map in comparison to the others and just needs/needed a few tweaks. My pleasure to help. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 16:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

1211 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-09 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.247176620E09 +++$+++ Hello Wiggy, just one of my usual requests. Does your book have anything on the above club? I'm looking for some information to add to the [[BSK Olympia Neugablonz]] article. You propably won't have anything on the later as it hasn't played above 4th tier but BSK Gablonz has had some local success before the war. Thanks for any information you can dig up,  +++$+++ Hello Wiggy, just one of my usual requests. Does your book have anything on the above club? I'm looking for some information to add to the [[BSK Olympia Neugablonz]] article. You propably won't have anything on the later as it hasn't played above 4th tier but BSK Gablonz has had some local success before the war. Thanks for any information you can dig up, [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 14:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
1212 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1211 +++$+++ 1211 +++$+++ 2009-07-09 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.247194500E09 +++$+++ There you go.  +++$+++ :There you go. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 19:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
1213 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1211 +++$+++ 1212 +++$+++ 2009-07-09 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.247195220E09 +++$+++ Ah. Did find this: [http:\/\/www.nemeckyfotbal.cz\/kniha\/75.pdf www.nemeckyfotbal.cz\/kniha\/75.pdf] and this [http:\/\/odznaky.wz.cz\/katalog\/nemecke\/g\/gablonz.htm odznaky.wz.cz\/katalog\/nemecke\/g\/gablonz.htm] (very cool).  +++$+++ ::Ah. Did find this: [http://www.nemeckyfotbal.cz/kniha/75.pdf www.nemeckyfotbal.cz/kniha/75.pdf] and this [http://odznaky.wz.cz/katalog/nemecke/g/gablonz.htm odznaky.wz.cz/katalog/nemecke/g/gablonz.htm] (very cool). [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 20:07, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
1214 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1211 +++$+++ 1213 +++$+++ 2009-07-09 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.247196840E09 +++$+++ Could be tonight's project.  +++$+++ :::Could be tonight's project. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 20:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
1215 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1211 +++$+++ 1214 +++$+++ 2009-07-09 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.247198100E09 +++$+++ Here's the site index showing what pages of the Czech book are available. [http:\/\/www.nemeckyfotbal.cz\/obsah.html www.nemeckyfotbal.cz\/obsah.html]. I wasn't sure about this book, but now having a proper look at it I might have to break down and buy it. Have fun.  +++$+++ ::::Here's the site index showing what pages of the Czech book are available. [http://www.nemeckyfotbal.cz/obsah.html www.nemeckyfotbal.cz/obsah.html]. I wasn't sure about this book, but now having a proper look at it I might have to break down and buy it. Have fun. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 20:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

263358 +++$+++ JesseW +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-18 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.145428440E09 +++$+++ I have not removed the sockpuppet blocking report you put on WP:AIV, because I assume you know better, but it certainly seems like that's not the right place for such a request.  I, at least, while being totally comfortable blocking clear and obvious vandals, are not sure how to judge or verify a sockpuppet report...  Explanation\/help\/response appreciated.  +++$+++ I have not removed the sockpuppet blocking report you put on WP:AIV, because I assume you know better, but it certainly seems like that's not the right place for such a request.  I, at least, while being totally comfortable blocking clear and obvious vandals, are not sure how to judge or verify a sockpuppet report...  Explanation/help/response appreciated. [[User:JesseW/sig|JesseW, the juggling janitor]] 23:34, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
263359 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263358 +++$+++ 263358 +++$+++ 2006-04-18 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.145428680E09 +++$+++ Mmm, I don't know better, I'm afraid (contrary to what's on WP:AN, I'm not an admin!). I put it there because I thought it would be the quickest way to bring him to the attention of people with expertise.  +++$+++ :Mmm, I don't know better, I'm afraid (contrary to what's on WP:AN, I'm not an admin!). I put it there because I thought it would be the quickest way to bring him to the attention of people with expertise. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 23:38, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
263360 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263358 +++$+++ 263359 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.145555280E09 +++$+++ lol  +++$+++ ::lol [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 10:48, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

525503 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-09 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.191963120E09 +++$+++ Is there a particular reason for the choice of yellow \/ grey in this navbox? I thought the idea of standardising on [[:template:navbox]] was to ''avoid'' having custom boxes for every subject. Is this a WikiPorject decision?  +++$+++ Is there a particular reason for the choice of yellow / grey in this navbox? I thought the idea of standardising on [[:template:navbox]] was to ''avoid'' having custom boxes for every subject. Is this a WikiPorject decision? [[User:Thumperward|Chris Cunningham]] 13:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
525504 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525503 +++$+++ 525503 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.192128780E09 +++$+++ If you have a policy source for your claim that the titlestyle and groupstyle fields are not to be used, please provide one. -- +++$+++ :If you have a policy source for your claim that the titlestyle and groupstyle fields are not to be used, please provide one. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 11:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
525505 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525503 +++$+++ 525504 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.192129620E09 +++$+++ From [[template:navbox\/doc]]: \"''It is not recommended that one modifies the default styles''\". They're not included in the basic usage note either. I'm happy for this to be overridden on a project-level basis ([[template:military navigation]] does this), but doing it on individual templates for no sake other than to have them stand out isn't appropriate.  +++$+++ :: From [[template:navbox/doc]]: "''It is not recommended that one modifies the default styles''". They're not included in the basic usage note either. I'm happy for this to be overridden on a project-level basis ([[template:military navigation]] does this), but doing it on individual templates for no sake other than to have them stand out isn't appropriate. [[User:Thumperward|Chris Cunningham]] 12:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
525506 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525503 +++$+++ 525505 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.192132200E09 +++$+++ Since you don't have a policy source, I'd encourage you to take your issue to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine]] or [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine]]. -- +++$+++ :::Since you don't have a policy source, I'd encourage you to take your issue to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine]] or [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 12:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
525507 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525503 +++$+++ 525506 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.192134240E09 +++$+++ This is an interesting interpretation of my purpose in starting this dialogue. Seeing as the only thing I can find in the way of template guidelines on either of those project pages is <nowiki>{{medicine}}<\/nowiki>, which doesn't have any additional styling, I don't see that there's any argument for ignoring what the navbox documentation recommends.  +++$+++ :::: This is an interesting interpretation of my purpose in starting this dialogue. Seeing as the only thing I can find in the way of template guidelines on either of those project pages is <nowiki>{{medicine}}</nowiki>, which doesn't have any additional styling, I don't see that there's any argument for ignoring what the navbox documentation recommends. [[User:Thumperward|Chris Cunningham]] 13:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

1216 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1216 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-10 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.247209800E09 +++$+++ Thanks Wiggy. Yeah, I noticed the book, too and added a link to it in the club article. If only I could read Czech. My aunt's Czech but she lives in Germany, so not much help there! But that book is quite interessting, it seems to talk about a ''German Cup'' competition in Czechoslovakia. Well, Nemecky is definetly the Czech word for German. It will take a bit of digging through.  +++$+++ Thanks Wiggy. Yeah, I noticed the book, too and added a link to it in the club article. If only I could read Czech. My aunt's Czech but she lives in Germany, so not much help there! But that book is quite interessting, it seems to talk about a ''German Cup'' competition in Czechoslovakia. Well, Nemecky is definetly the Czech word for German. It will take a bit of digging through. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:10, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
1217 +++$+++ EA210269 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1216 +++$+++ 1216 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.247211600E09 +++$+++ What a wealth of information! Shame not all pages seem to be there. The club list starting from page 154 doesn't include ''G'', must be on one of the pages that aren't online.  +++$+++ :What a wealth of information! Shame not all pages seem to be there. The club list starting from page 154 doesn't include ''G'', must be on one of the pages that aren't online. [[User:EA210269|EA210269]] ([[User talk:EA210269|talk]]) 00:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

263361 +++$+++ Gizzakk +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-20 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.145562720E09 +++$+++ Yes, but it also states on the  picture's uplink page that movie posters are considered to be fair use when used in the english wikipedia; if I am incorrect, I apologize. --  +++$+++ Yes, but it also states on the  picture's uplink page that movie posters are considered to be fair use when used in the english wikipedia; if I am incorrect, I apologize. -- [[User:Gizzakk|Gizzakk]] 12:52, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
263362 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263361 +++$+++ 263361 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.145563980E09 +++$+++ Movie posters '''can''' certainly be fair use, but only in articles about that movie (or about the poster itself, even). Outside of this, though, they are not fair use, and their use is copyright infringement.  +++$+++ :Movie posters '''can''' certainly be fair use, but only in articles about that movie (or about the poster itself, even). Outside of this, though, they are not fair use, and their use is copyright infringement. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 13:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
263363 +++$+++ Sweetiepetie +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263361 +++$+++ 263362 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.145568360E09 +++$+++ So [[Vanilla Sky poster|this]] is ok?  +++$+++ ::So [[Vanilla Sky poster|this]] is ok? [[User:Sweetiepetie|Sweetie Petie]] 14:26, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
263364 +++$+++ Sweetiepetie +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263361 +++$+++ 263362 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.145569200E09 +++$+++ Aww it was speedily deleted :(  +++$+++ ::Aww it was speedily deleted :( [[User:Sweetiepetie|Sweetie Petie]] 14:40, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
263365 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263361 +++$+++ 263364 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.145574120E09 +++$+++ Shame I missed the content!  +++$+++ :::Shame I missed the content! [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 16:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
263366 +++$+++ Sweetiepetie +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263361 +++$+++ 263365 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.145636280E09 +++$+++ Oooh, it's on my talk page now :) I was going to add some comments about the lovely blue sky and fluffy white clouds but the article was gone by then.  +++$+++ ::::Oooh, it's on my talk page now :) I was going to add some comments about the lovely blue sky and fluffy white clouds but the article was gone by then. [[User:Sweetiepetie|Sweetie Petie]] 09:18, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
263367 +++$+++ Sweetiepetie +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263361 +++$+++ 263365 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 09:27:00 +++$+++ 1.145636820E09 +++$+++ Though is it fair use to have the image there now?  +++$+++ ::::Though is it fair use to have the image there now? [[User:Sweetiepetie|Sweetie Petie]] 09:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
263368 +++$+++ Sweetiepetie +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263361 +++$+++ 263367 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.145645040E09 +++$+++ Talking of fair use images on userpages, you'll be pleased to know I've got rid of all the fair use images on my userpage! I liked it better before though :(  +++$+++ :::::Talking of fair use images on userpages, you'll be pleased to know I've got rid of all the fair use images on my userpage! I liked it better before though :( [[User:Sweetiepetie|Sweetie Petie]] 11:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
263369 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263361 +++$+++ 263368 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.145645160E09 +++$+++ Thanks -- I know there are other people dealing with images on user pages. There's even been talk of a bot to do it!  +++$+++ ::::::Thanks -- I know there are other people dealing with images on user pages. There's even been talk of a bot to do it! [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 11:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

1218 +++$+++ DevSolar +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-10 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.247256000E09 +++$+++ I see talk here about books on German wartime and pre-war soccer, but I didn't really follow who owns which books, what's in there, and how much bother it would be to look something up. So just ignore me if it's too much bother: I got the German article on [[SC Verl]] pretty well fleshed-out, with coaches going back to 1986, and end-of-season scores back to 1970 (when the club moved up to tier IV). Any chance you might have more? I'd take *any* information on the club, actually; as it seems, I'm somewhat like the \"official inofficial internet historian\" for the club. ;-) --  +++$+++ I see talk here about books on German wartime and pre-war soccer, but I didn't really follow who owns which books, what's in there, and how much bother it would be to look something up. So just ignore me if it's too much bother: I got the German article on [[SC Verl]] pretty well fleshed-out, with coaches going back to 1986, and end-of-season scores back to 1970 (when the club moved up to tier IV). Any chance you might have more? I'd take *any* information on the club, actually; as it seems, I'm somewhat like the "official inofficial internet historian" for the club. ;-) -- [[User:DevSolar|DevSolar]] ([[User talk:DevSolar|talk]]) 13:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
1219 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1218 +++$+++ 1218 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.247274300E09 +++$+++ I'll update the article from whatever info I can get from the Vereinslexikon. After that I would suggest grazing through f-archiv.de to put together a seasonal table of results for the team. I'll post what I have to the team talk page or as hidden text in the article itself. I'll also let you know if I come across anything else. Good luck with your project!  +++$+++ :I'll update the article from whatever info I can get from the Vereinslexikon. After that I would suggest grazing through f-archiv.de to put together a seasonal table of results for the team. I'll post what I have to the team talk page or as hidden text in the article itself. I'll also let you know if I come across anything else. Good luck with your project! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 18:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
1220 +++$+++ DevSolar +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1218 +++$+++ 1219 +++$+++ 2009-07-12 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.247405820E09 +++$+++ f-archiv.de has been sucked dry a long time ago, but they didn't have results of 5th tier or below (pre-1970). Thanks for looking it up! --  +++$+++ ::f-archiv.de has been sucked dry a long time ago, but they didn't have results of 5th tier or below (pre-1970). Thanks for looking it up! -- [[User:DevSolar|DevSolar]] ([[User talk:DevSolar|talk]]) 06:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

525508 +++$+++ Mikael Häggström +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525508 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-13 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.192320420E09 +++$+++ I saw there was no page which really summarized all the muscles of the human body, so I made this Table of muscles of the human body\u200e. The closest I could find before were your templates on the subject. Furthermore, I also see you've done a lot of work on templates on other organ systems, and that's exactly what I'd like to have summary pages on too, e.g. Table of arteries\/veins\/nerves\/bones of the human body\u200e. However, before I start such a project, I was wondering if you know any such article in Wikipedia already? If there is one already, it would be pretty pointless to have another one. Your templates are kind of summarizing them, but I was rather looking for something detailed enough to be worth studying itself, and not linking to the main articles. Sure if I had time I'd like to learn everything in them, but unfortunately it's rather limited, so I'd rather have a summary. For arteries, for instance, I'd like to know just where they've come from and to where they branch or terminate. So, are there any such articles already, or do I have another project?  +++$+++ I saw there was no page which really summarized all the muscles of the human body, so I made this Table of muscles of the human body‎. The closest I could find before were your templates on the subject. Furthermore, I also see you've done a lot of work on templates on other organ systems, and that's exactly what I'd like to have summary pages on too, e.g. Table of arteries/veins/nerves/bones of the human body‎. However, before I start such a project, I was wondering if you know any such article in Wikipedia already? If there is one already, it would be pretty pointless to have another one. Your templates are kind of summarizing them, but I was rather looking for something detailed enough to be worth studying itself, and not linking to the main articles. Sure if I had time I'd like to learn everything in them, but unfortunately it's rather limited, so I'd rather have a summary. For arteries, for instance, I'd like to know just where they've come from and to where they branch or terminate. So, are there any such articles already, or do I have another project? [[User:Mikael Häggström|Mikael Häggström]] 17:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
525509 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525508 +++$+++ 525508 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.192510980E09 +++$+++ I'm not aware of any existing Wiki page that provides that, so I'm glad you're building it. -- +++$+++ :I'm not aware of any existing Wiki page that provides that, so I'm glad you're building it. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

1221 +++$+++ Auntieruth55 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-14 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.247558520E09 +++$+++ Hi, I could use some help with another image. You did some work on a 19th century German map, and now I'm stymied with an old Latin one.  Do you have time to help me?  :)   +++$+++ Hi, I could use some help with another image. You did some work on a 19th century German map, and now I'm stymied with an old Latin one.  Do you have time to help me?  :)  [[User:Auntieruth55|Auntieruth55]] ([[User talk:Auntieruth55|talk]]) 01:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
1222 +++$+++ Auntieruth55 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1221 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-14 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.247559780E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Blaeu 1645 - Coloniensis Archiepiscopatus.jpg]] I need to change \"some\" of the text to English (I've done some of it, not happy with what I've done).  Show some battles.  Mark more clearly the boundaries of the old electorate of Cologne, which did not include the city of cologne, btw.  And some other things.   +++$+++ ::[[:File:Blaeu 1645 - Coloniensis Archiepiscopatus.jpg]] I need to change "some" of the text to English (I've done some of it, not happy with what I've done).  Show some battles.  Mark more clearly the boundaries of the old electorate of Cologne, which did not include the city of cologne, btw.  And some other things.  [[User:Auntieruth55|Auntieruth55]] ([[User talk:Auntieruth55|talk]]) 01:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
1223 +++$+++ Auntieruth55 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1221 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-14 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.247559840E09 +++$+++ oh, and if you can lay your hands on a better map, to illustrate the Cologne war (Truchsischer Krieg), then I'll take a look.   +++$+++ :::oh, and if you can lay your hands on a better map, to illustrate the Cologne war (Truchsischer Krieg), then I'll take a look.  [[User:Auntieruth55|Auntieruth55]] ([[User talk:Auntieruth55|talk]]) 01:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
1224 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1221 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-14 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.247565420E09 +++$+++ So I gather that you are proposing a new map based on the image shown? HAve you got other material that shows the battles, etc. that you're referencing?  +++$+++ ::::So I gather that you are proposing a new map based on the image shown? HAve you got other material that shows the battles, etc. that you're referencing? [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 02:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
1225 +++$+++ Auntieruth55 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1221 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-14 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.247607600E09 +++$+++ unfortunately, no.  I can only tell you the locations and the year.  They were mostly sieges.  No troop movements. That map is also \"wonky\" in terms of north south...\"  we are used to seeing maps with north \"up\" and in this case north is in the middle right to lower right margin.  +++$+++ ::unfortunately, no.  I can only tell you the locations and the year.  They were mostly sieges.  No troop movements. That map is also "wonky" in terms of north south..."  we are used to seeing maps with north "up" and in this case north is in the middle right to lower right margin. [[User:Auntieruth55|Auntieruth55]] ([[User talk:Auntieruth55|talk]]) 14:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
1226 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1221 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-14 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.247614080E09 +++$+++ Well, tell you what. Send along the locations and year info along with any other detail you think is important to the map and I'll start chipping away at it and see what comes up. With a base map derived from the original its not a big deal to reorient the thing. Sounds like an interesting project.  +++$+++ :::Well, tell you what. Send along the locations and year info along with any other detail you think is important to the map and I'll start chipping away at it and see what comes up. With a base map derived from the original its not a big deal to reorient the thing. Sounds like an interesting project. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 16:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
1227 +++$+++ Auntieruth55 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1221 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-14 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.247617980E09 +++$+++ is there any way I can email you something -- I don't want to post the image I've worked on in case someone thinks its actually \"done\" and tries to use if for something else.  ...? here's my email. I'll take it down when you send me a note. Or you can delete it.   +++$+++ ::::is there any way I can email you something -- I don't want to post the image I've worked on in case someone thinks its actually "done" and tries to use if for something else.  ...? here's my email. I'll take it down when you send me a note. Or you can delete it.  [[User:Auntieruth55|Auntieruth55]] ([[User talk:Auntieruth55|talk]]) 17:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
1228 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1221 +++$+++ 1221 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.247646360E09 +++$+++ Yup. I've enabled the user email over in the left hand menu.  +++$+++ :Yup. I've enabled the user email over in the left hand menu. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 01:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

525510 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-15 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.192509180E09 +++$+++ I deleted again this article. It was listed on [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]] and multiple people, including some admins, agreed it was a copyright violation. You obviously don't agree with the deletion so please take it to [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] instead of restoring it yourself without even bothering to notify the deleting admin.  +++$+++ I deleted again this article. It was listed on [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]] and multiple people, including some admins, agreed it was a copyright violation. You obviously don't agree with the deletion so please take it to [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] instead of restoring it yourself without even bothering to notify the deleting admin. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 21:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
525511 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525510 +++$+++ 525510 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.192510920E09 +++$+++ I have restored the article. Please provide a link to the discussion you mention, and a link to the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|CSD]] code you believe justifies speedy deletion. -- +++$+++ :I have restored the article. Please provide a link to the discussion you mention, and a link to the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|CSD]] code you believe justifies speedy deletion. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:02, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
525512 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525510 +++$+++ 525511 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.192511520E09 +++$+++ I found [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems\/2007 September 29\/Articles]]. If that's your only reference, [[ICD-10]] isn't even close to being a justifiable speedy. I'm not opposed to discussion; I'm opposed to preemption of discussion. I've previously suggested taking this to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]] so the issue can be exposed to a wider community, and if you want this page gone, I encourage you to explore that venue. -- +++$+++ ::I found [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2007 September 29/Articles]]. If that's your only reference, [[ICD-10]] isn't even close to being a justifiable speedy. I'm not opposed to discussion; I'm opposed to preemption of discussion. I've previously suggested taking this to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]] so the issue can be exposed to a wider community, and if you want this page gone, I encourage you to explore that venue. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
525513 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525510 +++$+++ 525512 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.192513140E09 +++$+++ Ok, to be precise, one person tagged it as a copyvio, one admin on [[WP:CP]] agreed with the tagging, one other admin (me) also agreed and deleted the article. A deletion on [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]] is not a speedy anyway. After discussion on [[WP:CP]] a decision is made to delete or keep, As the closing admin, I decided to delete. If you don't agree, take it [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] but '''DO NOT''' [[Wikipedia:Wheel war|wheel war]]. Without, as stated before, even bothering to contact me. Which, surprise surprise you just did again since you restored the article.  +++$+++ :::Ok, to be precise, one person tagged it as a copyvio, one admin on [[WP:CP]] agreed with the tagging, one other admin (me) also agreed and deleted the article. A deletion on [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]] is not a speedy anyway. After discussion on [[WP:CP]] a decision is made to delete or keep, As the closing admin, I decided to delete. If you don't agree, take it [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] but '''DO NOT''' [[Wikipedia:Wheel war|wheel war]]. Without, as stated before, even bothering to contact me. Which, surprise surprise you just did again since you restored the article. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 22:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
525514 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525510 +++$+++ 525513 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.192513560E09 +++$+++ OK, as someone completely unaware of the whole thing until now, are we talking about [[ICD-10]] (which is basically just a table of contents) or the actual chapters, such as [[ICD-10 Chapter I: Certain infectious and parasitic diseases]]?  +++$+++ ::::OK, as someone completely unaware of the whole thing until now, are we talking about [[ICD-10]] (which is basically just a table of contents) or the actual chapters, such as [[ICD-10 Chapter I: Certain infectious and parasitic diseases]]? [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 22:46, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
525515 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525510 +++$+++ 525514 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.192514580E09 +++$+++ I never saw [[ICD-10 Chapter I: Certain infectious and parasitic diseases]] before so it is only about [[ICD-10]]. It is a 100 percent copy of a list which is copyrighted. See [http:\/\/www.who.int\/classifications\/apps\/icd\/icd10online\/] and [[Talk:ICD-10]] where there is permission to publish the list, but that is incompatible with the [[GFDL]] license. I actually don't mind being proven wrong with the copyvio, although per [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]] I don't think I am. (there is creativity here) I object more to the wheel warring of Arcadian.  +++$+++ :::::I never saw [[ICD-10 Chapter I: Certain infectious and parasitic diseases]] before so it is only about [[ICD-10]]. It is a 100 percent copy of a list which is copyrighted. See [http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/] and [[Talk:ICD-10]] where there is permission to publish the list, but that is incompatible with the [[GFDL]] license. I actually don't mind being proven wrong with the copyvio, although per [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]] I don't think I am. (there is creativity here) I object more to the wheel warring of Arcadian. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 23:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
525516 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525510 +++$+++ 525514 +++$+++ 2007-10-16 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.192582800E09 +++$+++ I asked for more input [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Copyvio_or_no_copyvio|here]].  +++$+++ :::::I asked for more input [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Copyvio_or_no_copyvio|here]]. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 18:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
525517 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525510 +++$+++ 525516 +++$+++ 2007-10-16 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.192591860E09 +++$+++ Good idea, although I think AN rather than AN\/I would have been enough? Oh well, t will probably get more attention where it is.  +++$+++ ::::::Good idea, although I think AN rather than AN/I would have been enough? Oh well, t will probably get more attention where it is. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 20:31, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
525518 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525510 +++$+++ 525517 +++$+++ 2007-10-16 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.192597980E09 +++$+++ Garion, we both reverted each other's administrative actions. Either we're both wheel-warring, or neither one of us is. -- +++$+++ :::::::Garion, we both reverted each other's administrative actions. Either we're both wheel-warring, or neither one of us is. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
525519 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525510 +++$+++ 525518 +++$+++ 2007-10-17 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.192627920E09 +++$+++ I probably shouldn't have deleted it a second time. Although I did contacted you when I did so, which is more than you did. You restored it once without contacting me, and once while you definitely were aware of the fact that I did a valid deletion (one you didn't agreed with). Would it have been so difficult to restore the article, leave me a message and ask somewhere else for more input? One thing seems clear anyway from discussion at AN\/I. [[WP:AFD]] is never used to settle copyright issues.  +++$+++ ::::::::I probably shouldn't have deleted it a second time. Although I did contacted you when I did so, which is more than you did. You restored it once without contacting me, and once while you definitely were aware of the fact that I did a valid deletion (one you didn't agreed with). Would it have been so difficult to restore the article, leave me a message and ask somewhere else for more input? One thing seems clear anyway from discussion at AN/I. [[WP:AFD]] is never used to settle copyright issues. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 06:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

263370 +++$+++ M3Plus +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-21 10:06:00 +++$+++ 1.145639160E09 +++$+++ I notice you frequently remove images (and text), especially from the [[One Foot In The Grave]] article. I am very much aware that such images may not reside on Wikipedia, but your edits are fairly useless, considering you do not add anything to the article, you merely remove. If you could suggest an image instead, then it would be a lot more useful.  +++$+++ I notice you frequently remove images (and text), especially from the [[One Foot In The Grave]] article. I am very much aware that such images may not reside on Wikipedia, but your edits are fairly useless, considering you do not add anything to the article, you merely remove. If you could suggest an image instead, then it would be a lot more useful. [[User:M3Plus|M3Plus]] 10:06, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
263371 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263370 +++$+++ 263370 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.145643060E09 +++$+++ Although I sympathise with your observations that my edits are sometimes negative, dealing with copyright violations are an important part of wikipedia's work. I can assure you, adding copyrighted images and text to articles (as has been done numerous times to the article you mention) is not only useles, it is a liability to both the legality and integrity of the entire project.  +++$+++ :Although I sympathise with your observations that my edits are sometimes negative, dealing with copyright violations are an important part of wikipedia's work. I can assure you, adding copyrighted images and text to articles (as has been done numerous times to the article you mention) is not only useles, it is a liability to both the legality and integrity of the entire project. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 11:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
263372 +++$+++ M3Plus +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263370 +++$+++ 263371 +++$+++ 2006-04-22 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.145723520E09 +++$+++ Might I suggest that you find a suitable image to replace, instead of merely remove.  +++$+++ ::Might I suggest that you find a suitable image to replace, instead of merely remove. [[User:M3Plus|M3Plus]] 09:32, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

592874 +++$+++ Wyrdlight +++$+++ A. B. +++$+++ 592874 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-12 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.292221800E09 +++$+++ A short note of thanks for the explanation (the first cogent one I've seen) and statesman like manner of handling these issues. Your concern for wiki comes through and having allowed a little time to pass and having reread your note a few times I realise my support for the underlying concept of wiki is undiminished. There seems to be no concern about uploaded images and I'll take that advice about links and propose them on the article discussion page (maybe those that are externally approved as educational resources would be appropriate suggestions) and leave it the wiki community to take it from there. Not sure how future reviewers recognise that links have been added legitimately in this way eg the Brookwood Cemetery link which has been through this process and removed again and reinstated again! But maybe a step at a time. Thanks  +++$+++ A short note of thanks for the explanation (the first cogent one I've seen) and statesman like manner of handling these issues. Your concern for wiki comes through and having allowed a little time to pass and having reread your note a few times I realise my support for the underlying concept of wiki is undiminished. There seems to be no concern about uploaded images and I'll take that advice about links and propose them on the article discussion page (maybe those that are externally approved as educational resources would be appropriate suggestions) and leave it the wiki community to take it from there. Not sure how future reviewers recognise that links have been added legitimately in this way eg the Brookwood Cemetery link which has been through this process and removed again and reinstated again! But maybe a step at a time. Thanks [[User:Wyrdlight|WyrdLight]] ([[User talk:Wyrdlight|talk]]) 22:30, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
592875 +++$+++ A. B. +++$+++ A. B. +++$+++ 592874 +++$+++ 592874 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.295948760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the nice note -- this makes my day. --<font face=\"Futura\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for the nice note -- this makes my day. --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] <sup>([[User talk:A. B.|talk]] •  [[Special:Contributions/A. B.|contribs]])</sup> </font> 01:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

263373 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263373 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-21 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.145646660E09 +++$+++ I think my reasons are well stated in the article themselves. The pictures are fair use, uploaded from [www.liveforever.com liveforever.com] with kind permission from the proprietor.-- +++$+++ I think my reasons are well stated in the article themselves. The pictures are fair use, uploaded from [www.liveforever.com liveforever.com] with kind permission from the proprietor.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 12:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
263374 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263373 +++$+++ 263373 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.145647320E09 +++$+++ The problem is that site is an unofficial page and does not have the right to grant permission for reproduction. We need the original source.  +++$+++ :The problem is that site is an unofficial page and does not have the right to grant permission for reproduction. We need the original source. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 12:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

263375 +++$+++ Ghirlandajo +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-21 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.145674080E09 +++$+++ Three images you listed has been already deleted in the past and restored by me with proper tags. If you think that deleting properly tagged images is fun, go on, delete it -  I'll reupload them to Commons with {PD-self} license, as less scrupulous editors than me always do. Seriously, can't you find something more useful to do than importuning me and other prolific, good-faith editors with your copyright paranoia? -- +++$+++ Three images you listed has been already deleted in the past and restored by me with proper tags. If you think that deleting properly tagged images is fun, go on, delete it -  I'll reupload them to Commons with {PD-self} license, as less scrupulous editors than me always do. Seriously, can't you find something more useful to do than importuning me and other prolific, good-faith editors with your copyright paranoia? --[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]] <sup>[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</sup> 19:48, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
263376 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263375 +++$+++ 263375 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.145676900E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions, please discuss them on the proper page rather than polluting my takl page with insults. You have not provided proper sources. You have not provided proper tags.  +++$+++ :If you have any questions, please discuss them on the proper page rather than polluting my takl page with insults. You have not provided proper sources. You have not provided proper tags. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 20:35, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

1232 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-01 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.254450300E09 +++$+++ I just created the [[Vorw\xe4rts Dessau]] site, but I'm somewhat inexperienced in this whole logo bu<s>ll<\/s>siness, so maybe you can help with supplying the current logo of the club? The [http:\/\/de.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Datei:ASG_Vorw\xe4rts_Dessau.svg German wiki] has it, but only as a svg which are not desirable here, as far as I understand it. Thanks in advance. (And thanks for the Delegierung tidbit, I shall go and seek a source some time in the future)  +++$+++ I just created the [[Vorwärts Dessau]] site, but I'm somewhat inexperienced in this whole logo bu<s>ll</s>siness, so maybe you can help with supplying the current logo of the club? The [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:ASG_Vorwärts_Dessau.svg German wiki] has it, but only as a svg which are not desirable here, as far as I understand it. Thanks in advance. (And thanks for the Delegierung tidbit, I shall go and seek a source some time in the future) [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 19:25, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
1233 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1232 +++$+++ 1232 +++$+++ 2009-10-01 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.254456900E09 +++$+++ There you go. I think I may have a DDR era logo for SG as well and can add that once I find\/clean it up.  +++$+++ :There you go. I think I may have a DDR era logo for SG as well and can add that once I find/clean it up. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 21:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
1234 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1232 +++$+++ 1233 +++$+++ 2009-10-02 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.254517620E09 +++$+++ That would be great, thanks. And another red link less in [[User:Madcynic\/Sandbox\/1. FC Magdeburg names and figures]]. Dynamo Schwerin and ASG Vorw\xe4rts Neubrandenburg next.  +++$+++ ::That would be great, thanks. And another red link less in [[User:Madcynic/Sandbox/1. FC Magdeburg names and figures]]. Dynamo Schwerin and ASG Vorwärts Neubrandenburg next. [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 14:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
1235 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1232 +++$+++ 1234 +++$+++ 2009-10-02 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.254541920E09 +++$+++ Excellent. Nice to see stuff for the former eastern clubs coming together.  +++$+++ :::Excellent. Nice to see stuff for the former eastern clubs coming together. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 20:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

263377 +++$+++ Renata3 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-21 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.145688720E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, [[User:'the JPS]] impersonated you. I placed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=49518873 a note] on the admins notice board.  +++$+++ Just to let you know, [[User:'the JPS]] impersonated you. I placed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=49518873 a note] on the admins notice board. [[User:Renata3|Renata]] 23:52, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
263378 +++$+++ Renata3 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263377 +++$+++ 263377 +++$+++ 2006-04-23 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.145831520E09 +++$+++ Welcome, and good luck on your RfA :)  +++$+++ :Welcome, and good luck on your RfA :) [[User:Renata3|Renata]] 15:32, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

263379 +++$+++ Tim! +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263379 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-22 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.145725440E09 +++$+++ Hey, I just noticed that you are NOT an administator, I had always assumed that you were. I wondered if you would be interested in being nominated?  +++$+++ Hey, I just noticed that you are NOT an administator, I had always assumed that you were. I wondered if you would be interested in being nominated? [[User:Tim!|Tim!]] 10:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
263380 +++$+++ Tim! +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263379 +++$+++ 263379 +++$+++ 2006-04-22 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.145768940E09 +++$+++ Alrighty, it's listed, fingers crossed :)  +++$+++ :Alrighty, it's listed, fingers crossed :) [[User:Tim!|Tim!]] 22:09, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

1236 +++$+++ R'n'B +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-14 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.255574280E09 +++$+++ Please do not re-add a speedy deletion template after another user has removed it, as you did on [[:File:SVO Germaringen.jpg]].  [[WP:CSD|Speedy deletion]] is not the only method of seeking deletion of pages from Wikipedia, and in many cases another [[WP:Deletion|deletion process]] is more appropriate. In this particular case, the {{tl|db-f1}} criterion is very specific, and it ''only'' applies where the redundant file is \"in the same file format\" as the nominated file, among other things.  Your nomination simply does not meet the criteria, and repeating it will not change the situation.  -- +++$+++ Please do not re-add a speedy deletion template after another user has removed it, as you did on [[:File:SVO Germaringen.jpg]].  [[WP:CSD|Speedy deletion]] is not the only method of seeking deletion of pages from Wikipedia, and in many cases another [[WP:Deletion|deletion process]] is more appropriate. In this particular case, the {{tl|db-f1}} criterion is very specific, and it ''only'' applies where the redundant file is "in the same file format" as the nominated file, among other things.  Your nomination simply does not meet the criteria, and repeating it will not change the situation.  --[[User:R'n'B|R'n'B]] ([[User talk:R'n'B|call me]] Russ) 19:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
1237 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1236 +++$+++ 1236 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.255575360E09 +++$+++ Well then, as someone who is clearly experienced in the area, how about applying or suggesting the correct template to use as the image is clearly redundant as it is no longer in use as part of any article? Thanks.  +++$+++ :Well then, as someone who is clearly experienced in the area, how about applying or suggesting the correct template to use as the image is clearly redundant as it is no longer in use as part of any article? Thanks. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 19:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
1238 +++$+++ R'n'B +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1236 +++$+++ 1237 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.255654980E09 +++$+++ Alas, your assumption is wrong.  I sometimes go through the [[WP:CSD#F1|F1]] deletion requests because the criterion is so simple and specific that it doesn't take a lot of specialized knowledge to apply, but I avoid pretty much all of the other F-series requests and let other admins deal with them.  So I'm not sure what the correct process is for this file, but if all else fails, there is always [[WP:FFD]].  -- +++$+++ :: Alas, your assumption is wrong.  I sometimes go through the [[WP:CSD#F1|F1]] deletion requests because the criterion is so simple and specific that it doesn't take a lot of specialized knowledge to apply, but I avoid pretty much all of the other F-series requests and let other admins deal with them.  So I'm not sure what the correct process is for this file, but if all else fails, there is always [[WP:FFD]].  --[[User:R'n'B|R'n'B]] ([[User talk:R'n'B|call me]] Russ) 18:03, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

263381 +++$+++ BillZ +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-22 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.145768040E09 +++$+++ The image NVBuildings.jpg was taken by myself. +++$+++ The image NVBuildings.jpg was taken by myself.[[User:BillZ|BillZ]] 21:54, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
263382 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263381 +++$+++ 263381 +++$+++ 2006-04-22 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.145768220E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'll ammend the description page.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I'll ammend the description page. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 21:57, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

525526 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-25 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.193296860E09 +++$+++ I think you should be very careful and cross-check the ICD-9 codes you are adding to articles with someone else (the one added to [[postperfusion syndrome\u200e]] was stunningly wrong). It's far better to have no code than an erroneous one. - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ I think you should be very careful and cross-check the ICD-9 codes you are adding to articles with someone else (the one added to [[postperfusion syndrome‎]] was stunningly wrong). It's far better to have no code than an erroneous one. - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 00:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
525527 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525526 +++$+++ 525526 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.193300280E09 +++$+++ Look again at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Postperfusion_syndrome&diff=166774708&oldid=166658589 my addition]. Click on {{ICD9|999.8}}. Scroll down, until you see the words \"Postperfusion syndrome NEC 999.8\". (In this context, \"NEC\" just means \"not elsewhere classified\".) -- +++$+++ :Look again at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Postperfusion_syndrome&diff=166774708&oldid=166658589 my addition]. Click on {{ICD9|999.8}}. Scroll down, until you see the words "Postperfusion syndrome NEC 999.8". (In this context, "NEC" just means "not elsewhere classified".) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
525528 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525526 +++$+++ 525527 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.193317740E09 +++$+++ Just because something is called \"postperfusion syndrome\" doesn't make it related to the article at hand. I believe you'll find ICD-9 code 999.8 refers to another type of postperfusion syndrome (e.g., cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) causes a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), which can progress to an acute lung inflammation known as postperfusion syndrome), and not to a neurological syndrome of cerebral dysfunction following a bypass operation. Unfortunately, ICD-9 coding seems fraught with confusion based on this sort of superficial similarity of naming, since it's not based on clinical criteria and is carried out by people without direct clinical experience.  - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ ::Just because something is called "postperfusion syndrome" doesn't make it related to the article at hand. I believe you'll find ICD-9 code 999.8 refers to another type of postperfusion syndrome (e.g., cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) causes a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), which can progress to an acute lung inflammation known as postperfusion syndrome), and not to a neurological syndrome of cerebral dysfunction following a bypass operation. Unfortunately, ICD-9 coding seems fraught with confusion based on this sort of superficial similarity of naming, since it's not based on clinical criteria and is carried out by people without direct clinical experience.  - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 06:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
525529 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525526 +++$+++ 525528 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.193329860E09 +++$+++ [[Systemic inflammatory response syndrome|SIRS]] is {{ICD9|995.90}}. Full response at [[Talk:Postperfusion_syndrome#ICD-9_classification]]. -- +++$+++ :::[[Systemic inflammatory response syndrome|SIRS]] is {{ICD9|995.90}}. Full response at [[Talk:Postperfusion_syndrome#ICD-9_classification]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 09:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
525530 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525526 +++$+++ 525529 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.193333400E09 +++$+++ It matters not one whit what you code SIRS as. Read the description again: CPB causes SIRS ''which can progress to an acute lung inflammation known as '''postperfusion syndrome'''''. SIRS and postperfusion syndrome are not identical, and neither applies to the syndrome covered by the Wikipedia article. The postperfusion syndrome for which 999.8 is used as a code is a SIRS-like syndrome, as the ICD-9 manual says it is synonymous with \"Septic shock due to transfusion\". - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ ::::It matters not one whit what you code SIRS as. Read the description again: CPB causes SIRS ''which can progress to an acute lung inflammation known as '''postperfusion syndrome'''''. SIRS and postperfusion syndrome are not identical, and neither applies to the syndrome covered by the Wikipedia article. The postperfusion syndrome for which 999.8 is used as a code is a SIRS-like syndrome, as the ICD-9 manual says it is synonymous with "Septic shock due to transfusion". - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 10:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

1239 +++$+++ Sebastian scha. +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1239 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-15 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.255636140E09 +++$+++ OH, sorry. I will not delete or edit the football cats anymore, although I think it's overcat and not intended. Cheers.  +++$+++ OH, sorry. I will not delete or edit the football cats anymore, although I think it's overcat and not intended. Cheers. [[User:Sebastian scha.|Sebastian scha.]] ([[User talk:Sebastian scha.|talk]]) 12:49, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
1240 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1239 +++$+++ 1239 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.255653180E09 +++$+++ Happy editing! Keep well.  +++$+++ :Happy editing! Keep well. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 17:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

263385 +++$+++ Gmaxwell +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263385 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-26 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.146047160E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image:Purelbottle.jpg&diff=46936519&oldid=43471976]. Unless a user explictly tells us that they are the copyright holder, we can presume nothing. 'Found on the web' image outnumber user-created images by a significant number on Wikipedia. Just because a picture doesn't look professional doesn't mean that it is any less likely that it was simply 'found on the web'. With the booming popularity of sites like flikr we can only expect the number of amateure looking, high res, and illegially uploaded by a third party to increase. :) -- +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Purelbottle.jpg&diff=46936519&oldid=43471976]. Unless a user explictly tells us that they are the copyright holder, we can presume nothing. 'Found on the web' image outnumber user-created images by a significant number on Wikipedia. Just because a picture doesn't look professional doesn't mean that it is any less likely that it was simply 'found on the web'. With the booming popularity of sites like flikr we can only expect the number of amateure looking, high res, and illegially uploaded by a third party to increase. :) --[[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] 03:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
263386 +++$+++ Gmaxwell +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263385 +++$+++ 263385 +++$+++ 2006-04-26 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.146047520E09 +++$+++ Oh, and when you do use that tag, unless that image is years old please leave the users a note to ask them to put a correct tag on it.-- +++$+++ :Oh, and when you do use that tag, unless that image is years old please leave the users a note to ask them to put a correct tag on it.--[[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] 03:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
263387 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263385 +++$+++ 263386 +++$+++ 2006-04-26 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.146071280E09 +++$+++ Heil ;) Fair enough; thanks for the note. There were several very similar images from the same uploader, which I marked as nsd. This one was being used in an article and assumed good faith. I take yur advice about asking for clarifiaction: is there boilerplate text for that?  +++$+++ ::Heil ;) Fair enough; thanks for the note. There were several very similar images from the same uploader, which I marked as nsd. This one was being used in an article and assumed good faith. I take yur advice about asking for clarifiaction: is there boilerplate text for that? [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 10:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

525531 +++$+++ Walking Softly +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-25 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.193369160E09 +++$+++ Hi, Arcadian.  Thanks for removing the vandalism from the EDS page.  My question to you is actually just a technical one concerning how to assess the importance of medical topics.  I tried to do this for Chlamydia trachomatis, but couldn't figure out what symbols to use where, so gave up and put it under assessment of microbiology importance.  Would you please be so kind as to give me a step-by-step tutorial?  I've added myself to the Wiki Medicine project, and I've found the link that shows you what text you're supposed to add for creating assessments concerning pages identified as medical topics, but I must not be doing it correctly.  One spot I'm probably messing up in is in the replacement of the ambigous characters.  I'm assuming \"Chlamydia\" (without the quotation marks) goes in place of the ellipses, and \"High\" goes in place of the question marks.  However, please note that I would be fine with your just going ahead and moving my Chlamydia assessment to the proper place immediately and waiting a bit to give me the tutorial.  Frankly, I should be studying for boards at the moment, not doing this!  Thanks. +++$+++ Hi, Arcadian.  Thanks for removing the vandalism from the EDS page.  My question to you is actually just a technical one concerning how to assess the importance of medical topics.  I tried to do this for Chlamydia trachomatis, but couldn't figure out what symbols to use where, so gave up and put it under assessment of microbiology importance.  Would you please be so kind as to give me a step-by-step tutorial?  I've added myself to the Wiki Medicine project, and I've found the link that shows you what text you're supposed to add for creating assessments concerning pages identified as medical topics, but I must not be doing it correctly.  One spot I'm probably messing up in is in the replacement of the ambigous characters.  I'm assuming "Chlamydia" (without the quotation marks) goes in place of the ellipses, and "High" goes in place of the question marks.  However, please note that I would be fine with your just going ahead and moving my Chlamydia assessment to the proper place immediately and waiting a bit to give me the tutorial.  Frankly, I should be studying for boards at the moment, not doing this!  Thanks.[[User:Walking Softly|Walking Softly]] 20:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
525532 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525531 +++$+++ 525531 +++$+++ 2007-10-26 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.193431440E09 +++$+++ First, click on this link: [[Talk:Chlamydia trachomatis]]. Then, click \"Edit this page\". You will see a string \"WikiProject Micro|class=Start|importance=High\" inside double braces. Change the parameters as needed. Additional guidance is available at [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team\/Assessment]], [[Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team\/Release_Version_Criteria#Importance_of_topic]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine\/Assessment]], but if you have more specific questions, feel free to ask me. Welcome to Wikipedia. -- +++$+++ :First, click on this link: [[Talk:Chlamydia trachomatis]]. Then, click "Edit this page". You will see a string "WikiProject Micro|class=Start|importance=High" inside double braces. Change the parameters as needed. Additional guidance is available at [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment]], [[Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Release_Version_Criteria#Importance_of_topic]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Assessment]], but if you have more specific questions, feel free to ask me. Welcome to Wikipedia. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 13:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
525533 +++$+++ Walking Softly +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525531 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.193473080E09 +++$+++ Update: Please see [[Talk:Chlamydia]] for an experienced someone's response regarding the above issue and my reply.   +++$+++ ::::Update: Please see [[Talk:Chlamydia]] for an experienced someone's response regarding the above issue and my reply.  [[User:Walking Softly|Walking Softly]] 01:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
525534 +++$+++ Walking Softly +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525531 +++$+++ 525532 +++$+++ 2007-10-26 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.193433540E09 +++$+++ Oh, one other thing, there are no brackets, no existing parameters on the [[Talk:Chlamydia]] page for a MEDICAL assessment, so I'm still in the dark as to how to assess (or rather move my existing assessment for) the page.  Brackets, etc., are there for micro, not for medical. +++$+++ ::Oh, one other thing, there are no brackets, no existing parameters on the [[Talk:Chlamydia]] page for a MEDICAL assessment, so I'm still in the dark as to how to assess (or rather move my existing assessment for) the page.  Brackets, etc., are there for micro, not for medical.[[User:Walking Softly|Walking Softly]] 14:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
525535 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525531 +++$+++ 525534 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.193474100E09 +++$+++ I am in complete agreement with [[User:DO11.10]], and would oppose the proposed merge with [[Chlamydia trachomatis]]. -- +++$+++ :::I am in complete agreement with [[User:DO11.10]], and would oppose the proposed merge with [[Chlamydia trachomatis]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
525536 +++$+++ Walking Softly +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525531 +++$+++ 525535 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.193476740E09 +++$+++ As stated in my reply to [[User:DO11.10]], I am no longer in favor of merging the two pages now that I understand the disease vs. organism standard on Wiki.  However, I would like your opinion on how best to clarify on the [[Chlamydia]] page (and perhaps on all Chlamydiae pages) what is going on with the name that so many find confusing.  The intro as it stands seems a bit broad to me if the page is to focus only on the disease caused by [[Chlamyida trachomatis]], and I'm not sure sloshing the explanation in with the regular introduction is the best way to do it.  Btw, my apologies for asking so many questions.  I figured it was best to ask before acting, though, especially when considering such large changes.  Once I'm more solidly on my feet, I won't be such a pain, I promise:)   +++$+++ ::::As stated in my reply to [[User:DO11.10]], I am no longer in favor of merging the two pages now that I understand the disease vs. organism standard on Wiki.  However, I would like your opinion on how best to clarify on the [[Chlamydia]] page (and perhaps on all Chlamydiae pages) what is going on with the name that so many find confusing.  The intro as it stands seems a bit broad to me if the page is to focus only on the disease caused by [[Chlamyida trachomatis]], and I'm not sure sloshing the explanation in with the regular introduction is the best way to do it.  Btw, my apologies for asking so many questions.  I figured it was best to ask before acting, though, especially when considering such large changes.  Once I'm more solidly on my feet, I won't be such a pain, I promise:)  [[User:Walking Softly|Walking Softly]] 02:19, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
525537 +++$+++ Walking Softly +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525531 +++$+++ 525536 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.193539500E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for adding the disambiguation page on Chlamydia.  May we add to it links to [[Chlamydophila]], [[Chlamydophila pneumoniae]], [[Chlamydophila pecorum]], [[Chlamydophila psittaci]], [[Chlamydophila abortus]], [[Chlamydophila felis]], and [[Chlamydophila caviae]]?  Chlamydophila, Chlamydophila psittaci, and Chlamydophila pneumonia are particularly important because humans get these diseases and doctors for humans call them CHLAMYDIA such-and-such.  In addition, in the popular news, the Chlamydophila diseases for animals still seem to be called Chlamydia (with no species identification) which is confusing for the general public.   +++$+++ :::::Thank you very much for adding the disambiguation page on Chlamydia.  May we add to it links to [[Chlamydophila]], [[Chlamydophila pneumoniae]], [[Chlamydophila pecorum]], [[Chlamydophila psittaci]], [[Chlamydophila abortus]], [[Chlamydophila felis]], and [[Chlamydophila caviae]]?  Chlamydophila, Chlamydophila psittaci, and Chlamydophila pneumonia are particularly important because humans get these diseases and doctors for humans call them CHLAMYDIA such-and-such.  In addition, in the popular news, the Chlamydophila diseases for animals still seem to be called Chlamydia (with no species identification) which is confusing for the general public.  [[User:Walking Softly|Walking Softly]] 19:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
525538 +++$+++ Walking Softly +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525531 +++$+++ 525537 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.193543340E09 +++$+++ Update: A discussion on this topic is now underway at [[Talk:Chlamydia]].  I would encourage and appreciate your response there.   +++$+++ ::::::Update: A discussion on this topic is now underway at [[Talk:Chlamydia]].  I would encourage and appreciate your response there.  [[User:Walking Softly|Walking Softly]] 20:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

568186 +++$+++ Tintin1107 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-17 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.142634420E09 +++$+++ Can you please take another look at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Chikkaveera Rajendra]]  +++$+++ Can you please take another look at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chikkaveera Rajendra]] [[User:Tintin1107|Tintin]] ([[User_talk:Tintin1107|talk]]) 14:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
568187 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568186 +++$+++ 568186 +++$+++ 2006-03-17 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.142643720E09 +++$+++ Revised comments left on AfD page in response to improvements made to article. Regards,  +++$+++ :Revised comments left on AfD page in response to improvements made to article. Regards, [[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]] 17:02, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

263390 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-01 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.146535140E09 +++$+++ Congrats! You deleted [[Lucky Zion Designs]], but you forgot to close AfD. Wishing you many happy days deleting crap! Cheers! - <b> +++$+++ Congrats! You deleted [[Lucky Zion Designs]], but you forgot to close AfD. Wishing you many happy days deleting crap! Cheers! - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|CrazyRussian]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Crzrussian|contribs]]/[[Special:Emailuser/Crzrussian|email]]</small> 18:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
263391 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263390 +++$+++ 263390 +++$+++ 2006-05-01 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.146540960E09 +++$+++ Thnaks for letting me know. :) I've been playing with my new toys tonight: quite therapeutic, really.  +++$+++ :Thnaks for letting me know. :) I've been playing with my new toys tonight: quite therapeutic, really. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
263392 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263390 +++$+++ 263390 +++$+++ 2006-05-01 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.146541920E09 +++$+++ Hello. Thanks for getting in touch. When creating articles, it is important to follow [[WP:NPOV]]. Many editors felt that your article can be interpreted as being offensive for little perceptible gain. There is a discussion going on at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Sdw]], which you've already contributed to, but I don't think the article will last much longer. It shouldn't be recreated.  +++$+++ :Hello. Thanks for getting in touch. When creating articles, it is important to follow [[WP:NPOV]]. Many editors felt that your article can be interpreted as being offensive for little perceptible gain. There is a discussion going on at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sdw]], which you've already contributed to, but I don't think the article will last much longer. It shouldn't be recreated. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

263393 +++$+++ Gmaxwell +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-01 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.146543840E09 +++$+++ I didn't vote in your adminship only because I didn't want anyone to claim I only supported you because of the disagreement with Ghirlandajo.  I looked over your history, and it appears that you are find admin material. I wish you the best of luck, keep up the good work. -- +++$+++ I didn't vote in your adminship only because I didn't want anyone to claim I only supported you because of the disagreement with Ghirlandajo.  I looked over your history, and it appears that you are find admin material. I wish you the best of luck, keep up the good work. --[[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] 21:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
263394 +++$+++ Siva1979 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263393 +++$+++ 263393 +++$+++ 2006-05-02 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.146569700E09 +++$+++ Congrats! You deserve this! --<font style=\"background:gold\">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">S<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Congrats! You deserve this! --<font style="background:gold">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">S</font>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">[[User talk:Siva1979|Talk to me]]</font></sup> 04:35, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
263395 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263393 +++$+++ 263394 +++$+++ 2006-05-02 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.146633660E09 +++$+++ Congratulations from the land of winter.  +++$+++ ::Congratulations from the land of winter. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 22:21, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

549971 +++$+++ Zmaj +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 549971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-20 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.150811520E09 +++$+++ NOTE: This sock puppet wrote on his user page: ''This IP address is not a single user address - rather a proxy server IP address used by many people.'' Do not fall for his tricks. Firstly, he was identified as Purger's sock puppet by CheckUser. Secondly, a simple review of his contributions shows it is a single user with exactly the same agenda as Purger. -- +++$+++ NOTE: This sock puppet wrote on his user page: ''This IP address is not a single user address - rather a proxy server IP address used by many people.'' Do not fall for his tricks. Firstly, he was identified as Purger's sock puppet by CheckUser. Secondly, a simple review of his contributions shows it is a single user with exactly the same agenda as Purger. --[[User:Zmaj|Zmaj]] 06:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
549972 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 549971 +++$+++ 549971 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.150814040E09 +++$+++ Done. -- +++$+++ : Done. --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 07:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
549973 +++$+++ Zmaj +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 549971 +++$+++ 549972 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.150815840E09 +++$+++ Thank you. -- +++$+++ ::Thank you. --[[User:Zmaj|Zmaj]] 08:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
549974 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 549971 +++$+++ 549973 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.150863960E09 +++$+++ Actually you shouldn't block IP addresses indefinitely unless they're open proxies. I've reduced the block to 29 days, to coincide with the 30 day block I gave Purger yesterday. --  +++$+++ :::Actually you shouldn't block IP addresses indefinitely unless they're open proxies. I've reduced the block to 29 days, to coincide with the 30 day block I gave Purger yesterday. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] 21:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
549975 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 549971 +++$+++ 549974 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.150865160E09 +++$+++ Yeah, but the thing is this IP is obviously his static IP... but, right, the policy says not to block indefinetly... then I'll just watch the Ip after 30 days. -- +++$+++ :::: Yeah, but the thing is this IP is obviously his static IP... but, right, the policy says not to block indefinetly... then I'll just watch the Ip after 30 days. --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 21:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

525539 +++$+++ Walking Softly +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525539 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-26 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.193443620E09 +++$+++ Arcardian- A professor for whom I created an extensive website on a particular (and somewhat rare) disease is interested in trying to rewrite the Wiki page on this same subject.  I fear he may wish to include some of his amazing images, original figures and snippets of the text that we already created for our own site (which is presently part of the Johns Hopkins web).  We also used images from the NEI, NIH (which are both free use if given proper acknowledgment) and from other authors' journal articles (for which we got permission).  Though all these images, the quotations from his own journal articles, etc., make our website quite strong, I imagine that they might make copyright issues on Wiki a nightmare.  In addition, even though the images and text are copyrighted elsewhere, I'm wondering if the copyright protection would be lost if they were used on Wikipedia.  Should we have links to standalone pages containing the images (perhaps housed on the Johns Hopkins Web)?  Should we simply write what we can and then have a single image with a link to our page so they can see they full range of images there?  Your input or a redirect to someone better suited to this issue would be most appreciated.  By the by, what you tell me here will be of great value in the future, as well; I would like to work on creating such pages for other diseases that are of particular interest to me.  If I know how to safely use the primary research of professors and therefore am allowed to place it on Wikipedia, the quality of the resultant work will be that much higher.  And don't worry; my main goal is to make ivory-tower advanced level research and clinical knowledge accessible to the common layperson, assuming an 8th-grade reading level, not a post-graduate one.   +++$+++ Arcardian- A professor for whom I created an extensive website on a particular (and somewhat rare) disease is interested in trying to rewrite the Wiki page on this same subject.  I fear he may wish to include some of his amazing images, original figures and snippets of the text that we already created for our own site (which is presently part of the Johns Hopkins web).  We also used images from the NEI, NIH (which are both free use if given proper acknowledgment) and from other authors' journal articles (for which we got permission).  Though all these images, the quotations from his own journal articles, etc., make our website quite strong, I imagine that they might make copyright issues on Wiki a nightmare.  In addition, even though the images and text are copyrighted elsewhere, I'm wondering if the copyright protection would be lost if they were used on Wikipedia.  Should we have links to standalone pages containing the images (perhaps housed on the Johns Hopkins Web)?  Should we simply write what we can and then have a single image with a link to our page so they can see they full range of images there?  Your input or a redirect to someone better suited to this issue would be most appreciated.  By the by, what you tell me here will be of great value in the future, as well; I would like to work on creating such pages for other diseases that are of particular interest to me.  If I know how to safely use the primary research of professors and therefore am allowed to place it on Wikipedia, the quality of the resultant work will be that much higher.  And don't worry; my main goal is to make ivory-tower advanced level research and clinical knowledge accessible to the common layperson, assuming an 8th-grade reading level, not a post-graduate one.  [[User:Walking Softly|Walking Softly]] 17:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
525540 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525539 +++$+++ 525539 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.193474400E09 +++$+++ This is a complex issue, and text is handled differently than images. It's also important to distinguish between content owned by your professor, and content that your professor has permission to use but does not own. First, I'd recommend that you read [[Wikipedia:Copyrights]] and [[Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ]]. If you read through those pages, you will see many different links to talk pages that accept questions on much more specific questions you might have. -- +++$+++ :This is a complex issue, and text is handled differently than images. It's also important to distinguish between content owned by your professor, and content that your professor has permission to use but does not own. First, I'd recommend that you read [[Wikipedia:Copyrights]] and [[Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ]]. If you read through those pages, you will see many different links to talk pages that accept questions on much more specific questions you might have. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

263396 +++$+++ Stollery +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263396 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-01 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.146551700E09 +++$+++ Not sure if you realised he'd just moments before received an indefinite block by another admin. I don't know if your 15 minute cancels out the prior indefinite but if it does I thought I should let you know (incase you weren't aware). Thanks! - '''''[[User:Stollery|Gl]][[User:Stollery\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]][[User:Stollery|n]]''''' ''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Stollery|T]]<\/sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions\/Stollery|C]]<\/sub>  +++$+++ Not sure if you realised he'd just moments before received an indefinite block by another admin. I don't know if your 15 minute cancels out the prior indefinite but if it does I thought I should let you know (incase you weren't aware). Thanks! - '''''[[User:Stollery|Gl]][[User:Stollery/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Stollery|n]]''''' ''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Stollery|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Stollery|C]]</sub> [[User:Stollery|(Stollery)]]</small>'' 23:35, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
263397 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263396 +++$+++ 263396 +++$+++ 2006-05-01 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.146551940E09 +++$+++ Thanks, yeah, I noticed it. I'll keep an eye on it, and if my shorted(!) block cancels it out, then I'll re-block for indefinate (per Zoe). She beat me to it: by the time I'd deleted a couple more article!  +++$+++ :Thanks, yeah, I noticed it. I'll keep an eye on it, and if my shorted(!) block cancels it out, then I'll re-block for indefinate (per Zoe). She beat me to it: by the time I'd deleted a couple more article! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
263398 +++$+++ Zoe +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263396 +++$+++ 263397 +++$+++ 2006-05-01 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.146552480E09 +++$+++ Not a prob, I took care of it.  :)   +++$+++ ::Not a prob, I took care of it.  :)  [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 23:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
263399 +++$+++ Iamfree +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263396 +++$+++ 263396 +++$+++ 2006-05-01 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.146552540E09 +++$+++ i recreate before seeing message, then left appology to first admin. i will make more neutral article.  +++$+++ : i recreate before seeing message, then left appology to first admin. i will make more neutral article. [[User:Iamfree|Iamfree]] 23:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

525541 +++$+++ Mikael Häggström +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-27 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.193505240E09 +++$+++ Good day. I tried to add a new picture and increase the width of the infobox in [[Hair cell]], but it's in a format I'm not familiar with. Do you know how to do it?  +++$+++ Good day. I tried to add a new picture and increase the width of the infobox in [[Hair cell]], but it's in a format I'm not familiar with. Do you know how to do it? [[User:Mikael Häggström|Mikael Häggström]] 10:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
525542 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525541 +++$+++ 525541 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.193513640E09 +++$+++ The infobox there is [[Template:Infobox neuron]], which was created by [[User:Selket]]. It does not appear to support width, or a second image. If you want these features added, it would probably be better to ask Selket first. If he doesn't respond, I would be happy to add them. -- +++$+++ :The infobox there is [[Template:Infobox neuron]], which was created by [[User:Selket]]. It does not appear to support width, or a second image. If you want these features added, it would probably be better to ask Selket first. If he doesn't respond, I would be happy to add them. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 12:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

1254 +++$+++ Calistemon +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-08 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.268062980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message, old boy. I'm well, don't worry. I left wikipedia for a while, got tired of 18 year old kids that watch premier league football and think they are the cradle of football knowledge make policy here by weight of numbers. I returned a little while later under a different user name and only edited Western Australian mining articles. Recently, I've done a bit on German rugby union, just for the ease and fun of writing sports articles. All subjects not to many people care or know anything about and you virtually never meet unpleasant people at, unlike on football articles. Can't see myself returning to football, to painful, I'm scheduled to become a father this Thursday, that will take up heaps of my time. Anyway, great to hear from you,  +++$+++ Thanks for the message, old boy. I'm well, don't worry. I left wikipedia for a while, got tired of 18 year old kids that watch premier league football and think they are the cradle of football knowledge make policy here by weight of numbers. I returned a little while later under a different user name and only edited Western Australian mining articles. Recently, I've done a bit on German rugby union, just for the ease and fun of writing sports articles. All subjects not to many people care or know anything about and you virtually never meet unpleasant people at, unlike on football articles. Can't see myself returning to football, to painful, I'm scheduled to become a father this Thursday, that will take up heaps of my time. Anyway, great to hear from you, [[User:Calistemon|Calistemon]] ([[User talk:Calistemon|talk]]) 07:43, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
1255 +++$+++ Calistemon +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1254 +++$+++ 1254 +++$+++ 2010-03-20 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.269101880E09 +++$+++ Oh, by the way, happy birthday, too (just a little late)!  +++$+++ :Oh, by the way, happy birthday, too (just a little late)! [[User:Calistemon|Calistemon]] ([[User talk:Calistemon|talk]]) 09:18, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
1256 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1254 +++$+++ 1255 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.269209700E09 +++$+++ Thanks. So. How is your new son\/daughter and mom? I hope everything went well!  +++$+++ ::Thanks. So. How is your new son/daughter and mom? I hope everything went well! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 15:15, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
1257 +++$+++ Calistemon +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1254 +++$+++ 1256 +++$+++ 2010-03-22 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.269263880E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Mom and daughter are well, and Dad is suffering from a slight lack of sleep.  +++$+++ :::Thank you, Mom and daughter are well, and Dad is suffering from a slight lack of sleep. [[User:Calistemon|Calistemon]] ([[User talk:Calistemon|talk]]) 06:18, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

525543 +++$+++ K.murphy +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525543 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.193771340E09 +++$+++ Could you add a protein box to the [[Bile Salt Stimulated Lipase]] article?  +++$+++ Could you add a protein box to the [[Bile Salt Stimulated Lipase]] article? [[User:K.murphy|K.murphy]] 12:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
525544 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525543 +++$+++ 525543 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.193780640E09 +++$+++ Done. -- +++$+++ :Done. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 14:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

263401 +++$+++ Fuhghettaboutit +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-02 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.146625620E09 +++$+++ I was wondering why you decided not to block <span class=\"plainlinks\">[[User:170.158.48.13|170.158.48.13]] ([[User talk:170.158.48.13|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions\/170.158.48.13|contribs]] &bull; [{{fullurl:Special:Log\/move|user={{{2|170.158.48.13}}}}} page moves] &bull; [[Special:Blockip\/170.158.48.13|block user]] &bull; [{{fullurl:Special:Log\/block|page=User:{{{2|170.158.48.13}}}}} block log])<\/span> at WP:AIAV. Here's a vandal who had just come off a block, had blatantly vandalized three pages yesterday, and after three warnings yesterday, the last, a test4 (...\"you ''will'' be blocked\"...), comes back today and vandalizes again. I understand that he wasn't actively vandalizing pages at the moment I posted him\/her, that he had been idle for 8 hours, which your edit summary implied was the rationale for emptying the page without blocking, but if that's the only reason for not instituting the block, isn't that form over substance? More to the point, shouldn't you block the ip for vandalizing after a proper test4 no matter where you get that information, and then ''separately'' inform me that you are really serious over at WP:AIAV that the vandalism be within a short time frame of listing the vandal and that eight hours doesn't cut it? Or have I misinterpreted your edit summary entirely? Thanks for any reply -- +++$+++ I was wondering why you decided not to block <span class="plainlinks">[[User:170.158.48.13|170.158.48.13]] ([[User talk:170.158.48.13|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/170.158.48.13|contribs]] &bull; [{{fullurl:Special:Log/move|user={{{2|170.158.48.13}}}}} page moves] &bull; [[Special:Blockip/170.158.48.13|block user]] &bull; [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{{2|170.158.48.13}}}}} block log])</span> at WP:AIAV. Here's a vandal who had just come off a block, had blatantly vandalized three pages yesterday, and after three warnings yesterday, the last, a test4 (..."you ''will'' be blocked"...), comes back today and vandalizes again. I understand that he wasn't actively vandalizing pages at the moment I posted him/her, that he had been idle for 8 hours, which your edit summary implied was the rationale for emptying the page without blocking, but if that's the only reason for not instituting the block, isn't that form over substance? More to the point, shouldn't you block the ip for vandalizing after a proper test4 no matter where you get that information, and then ''separately'' inform me that you are really serious over at WP:AIAV that the vandalism be within a short time frame of listing the vandal and that eight hours doesn't cut it? Or have I misinterpreted your edit summary entirely? Thanks for any reply --[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] 20:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
263402 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263401 +++$+++ 263401 +++$+++ 2006-05-02 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.146626220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your message. I think you've summed up pretty much why I decided not to block. Officially (according to the rules on AIAV), the user must have vandalised within the last two hours.  I apologize for not informing you on your talk page, which I should have done -- though my edit summary (which I assumed you were watching) did the job. Sorry -- I know vandals are frustrating: if I catch him\/her during a spate, then I'd be happy to block. Otherwise, I'm bound by the rules.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your message. I think you've summed up pretty much why I decided not to block. Officially (according to the rules on AIAV), the user must have vandalised within the last two hours.  I apologize for not informing you on your talk page, which I should have done -- though my edit summary (which I assumed you were watching) did the job. Sorry -- I know vandals are frustrating: if I catch him/her during a spate, then I'd be happy to block. Otherwise, I'm bound by the rules. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
263403 +++$+++ Fuhghettaboutit +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263401 +++$+++ 263402 +++$+++ 2006-05-02 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.146628860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply. The thing I was getting at (and maybe I didn't speak with perfect clarity) is, aren't you ''allowed'' to block a vandal at any time after they have vandalized subsequent to a test4 even if it is long afterwards? Isn't the prohibition against ''posting at WP:AIAV by users where the vandalism hasn't occurred recently'' and '''not''' against blocking a vandal for his\/her vandalism? For that I certainly take blame, but shouldn't the vandal not be \"rewarded\" for my blunder? I may not be familiar with the relevant policy page, but I see nothing at [[Wikipedia:Block policy]], for instance, that prohibits blocking a persistent ip vandal just because the last vandalism is some time ago. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the reply. The thing I was getting at (and maybe I didn't speak with perfect clarity) is, aren't you ''allowed'' to block a vandal at any time after they have vandalized subsequent to a test4 even if it is long afterwards? Isn't the prohibition against ''posting at WP:AIAV by users where the vandalism hasn't occurred recently'' and '''not''' against blocking a vandal for his/her vandalism? For that I certainly take blame, but shouldn't the vandal not be "rewarded" for my blunder? I may not be familiar with the relevant policy page, but I see nothing at [[Wikipedia:Block policy]], for instance, that prohibits blocking a persistent ip vandal just because the last vandalism is some time ago. --[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] 21:01, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

1259 +++$+++ Calistemon +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1259 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-03 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.270281420E09 +++$+++ Seen the [[SV Dynamo]] edits? I think, looking at the style, its pretty clear who [[User:Saruha]] is. I really can't be asked to deal with him nowadays, but if you need a hand, let me know, always happy to back you up.  +++$+++ Seen the [[SV Dynamo]] edits? I think, looking at the style, its pretty clear who [[User:Saruha]] is. I really can't be asked to deal with him nowadays, but if you need a hand, let me know, always happy to back you up. [[User:Calistemon|Calistemon]] ([[User talk:Calistemon|talk]]) 00:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
1260 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1259 +++$+++ 1259 +++$+++ 2010-04-03 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.270282020E09 +++$+++ We're enjoying delightfully pleasant (but unseasonable) weather here in this part of Canada, which is good for one's state of mind. How's the baby doing?  +++$+++ :We're enjoying delightfully pleasant (but unseasonable) weather here in this part of Canada, which is good for one's state of mind. How's the baby doing? [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 01:07, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
1261 +++$+++ Calistemon +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1259 +++$+++ 1260 +++$+++ 2010-04-03 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.270286760E09 +++$+++ Baby is fine, just needs to gain more wait, she is being fed every three hours now! She keeps us pretty busy right now, time on Wikipedia is limited but a good distraction from a busy day. Not sure about the football bit, there is a lot left to do on the pre-war leagues but my devotion is lacking right now. As old Kay goes, his current edits seem mostly harmless and his English seems improved, too, nothing much to worry about. Enjoy the beautiful spring while we're having quite a nice autumn this year.  +++$+++ ::Baby is fine, just needs to gain more wait, she is being fed every three hours now! She keeps us pretty busy right now, time on Wikipedia is limited but a good distraction from a busy day. Not sure about the football bit, there is a lot left to do on the pre-war leagues but my devotion is lacking right now. As old Kay goes, his current edits seem mostly harmless and his English seems improved, too, nothing much to worry about. Enjoy the beautiful spring while we're having quite a nice autumn this year. [[User:Calistemon|Calistemon]] ([[User talk:Calistemon|talk]]) 02:26, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

525549 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-13 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.195022880E09 +++$+++ Hey Arcadian. Would you mind if I removed the drugbox from this article? As it's a class article, I honestly don't see what could be placed in the drugbox\u2014surely any individual info is better suited to individual articles, such as [[Lithium carbonate]] and [[Lithium orotate]]? :)  +++$+++ Hey Arcadian. Would you mind if I removed the drugbox from this article? As it's a class article, I honestly don't see what could be placed in the drugbox—surely any individual info is better suited to individual articles, such as [[Lithium carbonate]] and [[Lithium orotate]]? :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 22:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
525550 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525549 +++$+++ 525549 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.195023120E09 +++$+++ If you feel that's best, go ahead. -- +++$+++ :If you feel that's best, go ahead. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
525551 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525549 +++$+++ 525550 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.195023360E09 +++$+++ Thanks\u2014for what it's worth there's still a link to the ATC, which you added back in July.  +++$+++ ::Thanks—for what it's worth there's still a link to the ATC, which you added back in July. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 22:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

1262 +++$+++ 87.236.105.24 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-27 09:39:00 +++$+++ 1.272386340E09 +++$+++ thats funny, you as a canadian put up an article about a club in my german home town in the english wiki - while there isn't any article about it in the german wiki. weird but cool! keep it up mate (sry, have no account on english wiki, so i'm just Mr. IP) [[Special:Contributions\/87.236.105.24|87.236.105.24]] ( +++$+++ thats funny, you as a canadian put up an article about a club in my german home town in the english wiki - while there isn't any article about it in the german wiki. weird but cool! keep it up mate (sry, have no account on english wiki, so i'm just Mr. IP) [[Special:Contributions/87.236.105.24|87.236.105.24]] ([[User talk:87.236.105.24|talk]]) 09:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
1263 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1262 +++$+++ 1262 +++$+++ 2010-04-27 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.272433680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the notice and the encouragement! I'll stay hard at it. Everyone needs a hobby.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the notice and the encouragement! I'll stay hard at it. Everyone needs a hobby. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 22:48, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

437117 +++$+++ Hike395 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-13 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.131938100E09 +++$+++ Thanks! --  +++$+++ Thanks! -- [[User:Hike395|hike395]] 19:15, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
437118 +++$+++ Hike395 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437117 +++$+++ 437117 +++$+++ 2005-11-14 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.131966120E09 +++$+++ That's odd. I have IE6 also, under WinXP, and the Curpsbot edits look OK for me. The old edits from [[User:Gilgamesh]] still look broken to me (see, e.g., [[User talk:Gilgamesh#\u02bb looks like a rectangle under IE 6 \/ Win XP]]). The Curpsbot edits look broken to you? I wonder what is different. --  +++$+++ :That's odd. I have IE6 also, under WinXP, and the Curpsbot edits look OK for me. The old edits from [[User:Gilgamesh]] still look broken to me (see, e.g., [[User talk:Gilgamesh#ʻ looks like a rectangle under IE 6 / Win XP]]). The Curpsbot edits look broken to you? I wonder what is different. -- [[User:Hike395|hike395]] 03:02, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
437119 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437117 +++$+++ 437118 +++$+++ 2005-11-14 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.132020240E09 +++$+++ No reread what I added above.  The Curpbot edits now look good to me also -  +++$+++ ::No reread what I added above.  The Curpbot edits now look good to me also - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 18:04, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

525552 +++$+++ Picaroon +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-17 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.195303380E09 +++$+++ I am so sorry right now. I saw your move of [[Artery of the urethral bulb]] to [[Artery of bulb of penis]], and both the subject matter and the apparent grammatical mistake in the title immediately made me think of that {{user|Grawp}} page move vandal which was wreaking havoc a few days ago, and blocked immediately, guessing it was one of his accounts. I'm so sorry about this.  +++$+++ I am so sorry right now. I saw your move of [[Artery of the urethral bulb]] to [[Artery of bulb of penis]], and both the subject matter and the apparent grammatical mistake in the title immediately made me think of that {{user|Grawp}} page move vandal which was wreaking havoc a few days ago, and blocked immediately, guessing it was one of his accounts. I'm so sorry about this. [[User:Picaroon|Picaroon]] [[User talk:Picaroon|(t)]] 04:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
525553 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525552 +++$+++ 525552 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.195303440E09 +++$+++ No problem. Thanks for the quick fix. -- +++$+++ :No problem. Thanks for the quick fix. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian|talk]]) 04:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

263409 +++$+++ Jusjih +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-03 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.146686280E09 +++$+++ Best wish for your adminship.-- +++$+++ Best wish for your adminship.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 12:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
263410 +++$+++ Anirudhsbh +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263409 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.146704220E09 +++$+++ Best wishes! Use your mop well. --'''<font color=\"crimson\"> +++$+++ :::Best wishes! Use your mop well. --'''<font color="crimson">[[User:Anirudhsbh|Andy123]]</font>'''<small><font color="green">[[User talk:Anirudhsbh|(talk)]]</font></small> 17:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

525554 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-20 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.195629000E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, I was wondering if you could help me out with a template of the \"vertical\" kind for the [[Polio]] series of articles? I have created a mock-up version ([[User:DO11.10\/Sandbox|here]]), but it obviously needs to be adjusted for this series. I have no idea how to do this, and you seem to have a lot of experience in template making. I don't have any strong attachment to the design, just so long as the information is all there. Can you give me a hand? Thanks-- +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, I was wondering if you could help me out with a template of the "vertical" kind for the [[Polio]] series of articles? I have created a mock-up version ([[User:DO11.10/Sandbox|here]]), but it obviously needs to be adjusted for this series. I have no idea how to do this, and you seem to have a lot of experience in template making. I don't have any strong attachment to the design, just so long as the information is all there. Can you give me a hand? Thanks--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] ([[User talk:DO11.10|talk]]) 23:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
525555 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525554 +++$+++ 525554 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.195636620E09 +++$+++ Could I try talking you into a horizontal one instead? That approach seems to be much more sustainable. -- +++$+++ :Could I try talking you into a horizontal one instead? That approach seems to be much more sustainable. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian|talk]]) 01:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
525556 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525554 +++$+++ 525555 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.195642380E09 +++$+++ My reasoning for the vertical template was that I wanted it to be located at the top of the article, instead of at the end.  Although all of the daughter article are linked to in the main article, my goal was to make the series articles to be easier to find. If you think that a horizontal type is better, I would certainly reconsider. -- +++$+++ ::My reasoning for the vertical template was that I wanted it to be located at the top of the article, instead of at the end.  Although all of the daughter article are linked to in the main article, my goal was to make the series articles to be easier to find. If you think that a horizontal type is better, I would certainly reconsider. --[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] ([[User talk:DO11.10|talk]]) 02:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
525557 +++$+++ Una Smith +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525554 +++$+++ 525554 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.195712640E09 +++$+++ May I suggest rather than a navbox (or in addition) add category tags to those polio pages?  The category looks poorly populated now. -- +++$+++ :May I suggest rather than a navbox (or in addition) add category tags to those polio pages?  The category looks poorly populated now. --[[User:Una Smith|Una Smith]] ([[User talk:Una Smith|talk]]) 22:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
525558 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525554 +++$+++ 525557 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.195712940E09 +++$+++ (butting in) {{tl|Diabetes}} works fairly well in my opinion. I do find horizontal navboxes (such as {{tl|Multiple sclerosis}}) far less intrusive, though.  +++$+++ ::(butting in) {{tl|Diabetes}} works fairly well in my opinion. I do find horizontal navboxes (such as {{tl|Multiple sclerosis}}) far less intrusive, though. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 22:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

1267 +++$+++ Redhair23 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-06 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.278438360E09 +++$+++ Not sure why you've changed the logo, it's wrong and in a poor quality. We need a logo on Commons, so it can be used international, that's the reason why I've moved the right one from the German Wikipedia.  +++$+++ Not sure why you've changed the logo, it's wrong and in a poor quality. We need a logo on Commons, so it can be used international, that's the reason why I've moved the right one from the German Wikipedia. [[User:Redhair23|Redhair23]] ([[User talk:Redhair23|talk]]) 10:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
1268 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1267 +++$+++ 1267 +++$+++ 2010-07-06 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.278439320E09 +++$+++ The quality is fine. Its not strictly necessary to have an svg. The placement of logos on Commons is not acceptable as the logo is the property of the club, so whatever image is used it needs to happen under a fair use license - the image cannot legitimately be placed on Commons. In addition category and other information was lost when the change was made. I see now that the club is using a historical logo, so yes, that's what should be there now, but not as a commons file.  +++$+++ :The quality is fine. Its not strictly necessary to have an svg. The placement of logos on Commons is not acceptable as the logo is the property of the club, so whatever image is used it needs to happen under a fair use license - the image cannot legitimately be placed on Commons. In addition category and other information was lost when the change was made. I see now that the club is using a historical logo, so yes, that's what should be there now, but not as a commons file. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 11:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
1269 +++$+++ Madcynic +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1267 +++$+++ 1268 +++$+++ 2010-07-06 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.278441060E09 +++$+++ In addition, the club changed his logo for the new season, for a more retro version (cf. [http:\/\/www.designtagebuch.de\/1-fc-kaiserslautern-der-tradition-verpflichtet\/ here]), I'm not sure it is only to be used on the shirts as the article currently suggests.  +++$+++ ::In addition, the club changed his logo for the new season, for a more retro version (cf. [http://www.designtagebuch.de/1-fc-kaiserslautern-der-tradition-verpflichtet/ here]), I'm not sure it is only to be used on the shirts as the article currently suggests. [[User:Madcynic|Madcynic]] ([[User talk:Madcynic|talk]]) 11:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
1270 +++$+++ Redhair23 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1267 +++$+++ 1269 +++$+++ 2010-07-06 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.278470640E09 +++$+++ Honestly, I don't know which one is the official logo at the moment, but they will use the traditional logo on their shirts for at least one year, that's for sure, as seen on the official website [http:\/\/www.fck.de\/de\/aktuell\/news\/details\/article\/3363-traditionsverein-seit-1900-fck-praesentiert-neues-trikot\/news-browse\/3.html]. We are on the safe side to use the \"modern\" logo because it cannot be the wrong one before the new season started. I'm not sure about differences regarding licenses on Wikipedia and Commons but main goal has to be the same and the right logo (in an acceptable quality) for every Wikipedia page about the 1. FC Kaiserslautern and not a different one for each language. Commons is the only possible way to realize it and SVG is the recommended format. Until there is an official statement about the logo question, the logo shouldn't be changed, it's still used on www.bundesliga.de and even on www.fck.de on some sections. Even if the club confirms the change of the official logo, the modern logo must not be deleted but added to the other historical logos instead.  +++$+++ :::Honestly, I don't know which one is the official logo at the moment, but they will use the traditional logo on their shirts for at least one year, that's for sure, as seen on the official website [http://www.fck.de/de/aktuell/news/details/article/3363-traditionsverein-seit-1900-fck-praesentiert-neues-trikot/news-browse/3.html]. We are on the safe side to use the "modern" logo because it cannot be the wrong one before the new season started. I'm not sure about differences regarding licenses on Wikipedia and Commons but main goal has to be the same and the right logo (in an acceptable quality) for every Wikipedia page about the 1. FC Kaiserslautern and not a different one for each language. Commons is the only possible way to realize it and SVG is the recommended format. Until there is an official statement about the logo question, the logo shouldn't be changed, it's still used on www.bundesliga.de and even on www.fck.de on some sections. Even if the club confirms the change of the official logo, the modern logo must not be deleted but added to the other historical logos instead. [[User:Redhair23|Redhair23]] ([[User talk:Redhair23|talk]]) 19:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

263413 +++$+++ MrFizyx +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-03 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.146655260E09 +++$+++ What?  I didn't see no naked chicks!  Anyway.  Congrats on your RfA its the first and only one I've voted in!  Keep up the good work, use it wisely etc. etc. - +++$+++ What?  I didn't see no naked chicks!  Anyway.  Congrats on your RfA its the first and only one I've voted in!  Keep up the good work, use it wisely etc. etc. -[[User:MrFizyx|MrFizyx]] 04:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
263414 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263413 +++$+++ 263413 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 06:38:00 +++$+++ 1.146663480E09 +++$+++ Mmm, well after three years being single, I tend to see naked chicks everywhere. But, umm, I'm fairly sure I've never had any on my user page. (I suspect \"your site\" means the entire Wikipedia). Cheers :)  +++$+++ :Mmm, well after three years being single, I tend to see naked chicks everywhere. But, umm, I'm fairly sure I've never had any on my user page. (I suspect "your site" means the entire Wikipedia). Cheers :) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 06:38, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

1271 +++$+++ DASHBot +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-02 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.280751660E09 +++$+++ Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:DASHBot|DASHBot]] ([[User talk:DASHBot|talk]]) 05:21, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
1272 +++$+++ Jared Preston +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1271 +++$+++ 1271 +++$+++ 2010-08-03 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.280877060E09 +++$+++ Regarding the above bot message, this logo was replaced by [[:File:Tennis Borussia Berlin.jpg]]. See [http:\/\/www.tebe.de\/artikel2302.html here] for more information.  +++$+++ :Regarding the above bot message, this logo was replaced by [[:File:Tennis Borussia Berlin.jpg]]. See [http://www.tebe.de/artikel2302.html here] for more information. [[User:Jared Preston|Jared Preston]] ([[User talk:Jared Preston|talk]]) 16:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

263417 +++$+++ Petros471 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-03 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.146703380E09 +++$+++ Then a small bit of advice: on AIV instead of leaving a comment saying 'blocked' just remove the report from the page with the edit summary \"(user) blocked (for optionally give time), (list empty\/NOT EMPTY)\". Cheers,  +++$+++ Then a small bit of advice: on AIV instead of leaving a comment saying 'blocked' just remove the report from the page with the edit summary "(user) blocked (for optionally give time), (list empty/NOT EMPTY)". Cheers, [[User:Petros471|Petros471]] 17:43, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
263418 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263417 +++$+++ 263417 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.146703740E09 +++$+++ Cheers. I have been doing it myself in batches, unless someone else did it first, but I've been leaving it on a lil' to let others see what I'd decided. There was a while today that I was wasting so much time with edit conflicts on that page that I didn't want to edit for every action.  +++$+++ :Cheers. I have been doing it myself in batches, unless someone else did it first, but I've been leaving it on a lil' to let others see what I'd decided. There was a while today that I was wasting so much time with edit conflicts on that page that I didn't want to edit for every action. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:49, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
263419 +++$+++ Petros471 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263417 +++$+++ 263418 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.146704160E09 +++$+++ Yeh, edit conflicts can get bad there. Sometimes I just get on with the blocking and let others clear the reports off (obviously I would if no-one had after I'd finished dealing with them all).  +++$+++ ::Yeh, edit conflicts can get bad there. Sometimes I just get on with the blocking and let others clear the reports off (obviously I would if no-one had after I'd finished dealing with them all). [[User:Petros471|Petros471]] 17:56, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

525563 +++$+++ 68.39.174.238 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525563 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-21 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.195634940E09 +++$+++ Question that's been kicked around before, but I was told would be best asked here: Why does {{tl|ICD9}} use a .com site when {{tl|ICD10}} uses the WHO's site? Are their ICD9 pages impossible to systematically link to, or something similar? [[Special:Contributions\/68.39.174.238|68.39.174.238]] ( +++$+++ Question that's been kicked around before, but I was told would be best asked here: Why does {{tl|ICD9}} use a .com site when {{tl|ICD10}} uses the WHO's site? Are their ICD9 pages impossible to systematically link to, or something similar? [[Special:Contributions/68.39.174.238|68.39.174.238]] ([[User talk:68.39.174.238|talk]]) 00:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
525564 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525563 +++$+++ 525563 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.195636560E09 +++$+++ Response at [[Template talk:ICD9]]. -- +++$+++ :Response at [[Template talk:ICD9]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian|talk]]) 01:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

1276 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-03 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.288823280E09 +++$+++ Wiggy, I came across [[:File:Vorwarts be ff.png]], [[:File:Dynamo Dresden historical.png]] and [[:File:Greuther Feurth 0.png]], which I believe are montages created by you of copyrighted logos. The sources you indicated on the image description pages do not point to a copyright holder created montage. As such, we need a non-free rationale for each logo for each use. Thus, in the first case for example we'd need three rationales for every ''single'' use of the image. We do not encourage user created montages, as such montages often fail [[WP:NFCC]] #8. I've tagged these images as missing rationales and having disputed fair use claim, making them subject to deletion. If you have questions, ask. Thanks, -- +++$+++ Wiggy, I came across [[:File:Vorwarts be ff.png]], [[:File:Dynamo Dresden historical.png]] and [[:File:Greuther Feurth 0.png]], which I believe are montages created by you of copyrighted logos. The sources you indicated on the image description pages do not point to a copyright holder created montage. As such, we need a non-free rationale for each logo for each use. Thus, in the first case for example we'd need three rationales for every ''single'' use of the image. We do not encourage user created montages, as such montages often fail [[WP:NFCC]] #8. I've tagged these images as missing rationales and having disputed fair use claim, making them subject to deletion. If you have questions, ask. Thanks, --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 15:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
1277 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1276 +++$+++ 1276 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.288916700E09 +++$+++ Fixed. Thank you.  +++$+++ :Fixed. Thank you. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 17:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

525565 +++$+++ Leyo +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525565 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-22 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.195784340E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcadian. IMHO methanol does not belong to the ''primary alcohols'', as the carbon, where the OH-group is attached to, has no bond to another carbon (unlike e.g. ethanol). -- +++$+++ Hi Arcadian. IMHO methanol does not belong to the ''primary alcohols'', as the carbon, where the OH-group is attached to, has no bond to another carbon (unlike e.g. ethanol). --[[User:Leyo|Leyo]] ([[User talk:Leyo|talk]]) 18:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
525566 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525565 +++$+++ 525565 +++$+++ 2007-11-22 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.195786680E09 +++$+++ Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3AAlcohols&diff=173141931&oldid=162337516 adjusted the template accordingly]. I have also created an article for [[primary alcohol]], and I would encourage you to expand it. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AAlcohols&diff=173141931&oldid=162337516 adjusted the template accordingly]. I have also created an article for [[primary alcohol]], and I would encourage you to expand it. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian|talk]]) 18:58, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

1278 +++$+++ LUCPOL +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-05 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.289024760E09 +++$+++ 1. FC Katowice is also polish club, not only German.  +++$+++ 1. FC Katowice is also polish club, not only German. [[User:LUCPOL|LUCPOL]] ([[User talk:LUCPOL|talk]]) 23:26, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1279 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1278 +++$+++ 1278 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.289024940E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I get that. See my note on the club article talk page. I'm not saying its not Polish. Store your POV please. Or start a separate article on the new club.  +++$+++ :Yeah, I get that. See my note on the club article talk page. I'm not saying its not Polish. Store your POV please. Or start a separate article on the new club. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 23:29, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1280 +++$+++ LUCPOL +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1278 +++$+++ 1279 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.289025720E09 +++$+++ new club? This is not \"new\", this is reactivation. Two: 1. FC Katowice is also polish club, not only German, even if not counting now. See 1920's and 1930's. Three: \"''Store your POV please. ''\" - where? Where is my Silesian POV. Where? Citation please. I do not write here POV. I deletes your German POV. I introduced a neutral intro (not polish, not German, not Silesian).  +++$+++ ::new club? This is not "new", this is reactivation. Two: 1. FC Katowice is also polish club, not only German, even if not counting now. See 1920's and 1930's. Three: "''Store your POV please. ''" - where? Where is my Silesian POV. Where? Citation please. I do not write here POV. I deletes your German POV. I introduced a neutral intro (not polish, not German, not Silesian). [[User:LUCPOL|LUCPOL]] ([[User talk:LUCPOL|talk]]) 23:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
1281 +++$+++ Acroterion +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1278 +++$+++ 1280 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.289084040E09 +++$+++ I've been contacted by LUCPOL on my talkpage; please see my comments there. I'm inclined to believe that a separate article is a good idea, assuming the Polish club meets the notability standard - Euro-football organization isn't my field. '''<font face=\"Arial\"> +++$+++ :::I've been contacted by LUCPOL on my talkpage; please see my comments there. I'm inclined to believe that a separate article is a good idea, assuming the Polish club meets the notability standard - Euro-football organization isn't my field. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 15:54, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

525568 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-23 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.195890540E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 23:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
525569 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525568 +++$+++ 525568 +++$+++ 2007-12-01 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.196554380E09 +++$+++ Medical journals aren't available in most libraries, but they are in many medical school libraries. So first, try going to the nearest medical school, and ask the librarian if they have a copy. (The library may not be open to non-students\/faculty, but with some courtesy, there's a good chance the librarian will help you.) If that doesn't work, try the [https:\/\/thejns.org journal's website], and see if you can buy a back issue. If you try both of those, and neither one of them work, let me know, and I'll see what I can do. -- +++$+++ :Medical journals aren't available in most libraries, but they are in many medical school libraries. So first, try going to the nearest medical school, and ask the librarian if they have a copy. (The library may not be open to non-students/faculty, but with some courtesy, there's a good chance the librarian will help you.) If that doesn't work, try the [https://thejns.org journal's website], and see if you can buy a back issue. If you try both of those, and neither one of them work, let me know, and I'll see what I can do. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 16:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
525570 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525568 +++$+++ 525568 +++$+++ 2007-12-02 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.196660460E09 +++$+++ Thank you! -- +++$+++ :Thank you! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 21:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

174976 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ 174976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-30 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.309486200E09 +++$+++ Re your latest speedy request under db-g7 - you are quite within your rights to request this but I actually found it quite interesting. We have a number of dab\/set index pages at [[WP:ISLE]] such as [[Eilean Fraoch]] of a similar nature (admittedly all one language) and I thought I'd suggest a move to \"Big Water (disambiguation)\" or similar.  +++$+++ Re your latest speedy request under db-g7 - you are quite within your rights to request this but I actually found it quite interesting. We have a number of dab/set index pages at [[WP:ISLE]] such as [[Eilean Fraoch]] of a similar nature (admittedly all one language) and I thought I'd suggest a move to "Big Water (disambiguation)" or similar. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 19:10, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
174977 +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ 174976 +++$+++ 174976 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.309487040E09 +++$+++ Let me think it over for a little while.  +++$+++ :Let me think it over for a little while. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend#top|talk]]) 19:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
174978 +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ 174976 +++$+++ 174976 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.309488240E09 +++$+++ Okay, I think the best thing to do is to nominate it for Afd and see what happens.  +++$+++ :Okay, I think the best thing to do is to nominate it for Afd and see what happens. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend#top|talk]]) 19:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

1282 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1282 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-11 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.292079480E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of \"file\" pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]] 06:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
1283 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1282 +++$+++ 1282 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.295353680E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  04:28, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

525571 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-05 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.196912340E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcadian. I hope you don't mind, I've removed the line breaks (separating virus and virus classification) in the template; since size seemed to have been the major concern for splitting it, I figured making it a little more compact wouldn't hurt. If you think it's clearer ''with'' the line breaks, please feel free to revert my edit. Best,  +++$+++ Hi Arcadian. I hope you don't mind, I've removed the line breaks (separating virus and virus classification) in the template; since size seemed to have been the major concern for splitting it, I figured making it a little more compact wouldn't hurt. If you think it's clearer ''with'' the line breaks, please feel free to revert my edit. Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 19:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
525572 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525571 +++$+++ 525571 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.196913900E09 +++$+++ I don't mind at all -- your edit improved it. While you're in there, can you see a logical classification for the anti-herpesvirus agents? Some of those (i.e., [[Aciclovir]] and [[Valaciclovir]]) are of common families and could be grouped together, and there should be a name for the parent, but I can't figure out what they would be. -- +++$+++ :I don't mind at all -- your edit improved it. While you're in there, can you see a logical classification for the anti-herpesvirus agents? Some of those (i.e., [[Aciclovir]] and [[Valaciclovir]]) are of common families and could be grouped together, and there should be a name for the parent, but I can't figure out what they would be. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian|talk]]) 20:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
525573 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525571 +++$+++ 525571 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.196914560E09 +++$+++ [[Guanine]] analogues? (aciclovir ''et al.'') Idoxuridine, trifluridine and vidarabine could be under [[nucleoside analogues]]. Maybe [[cidofovir]] too, although I believe it's a nucleo''t''ide analogue.  +++$+++ :[[Guanine]] analogues? (aciclovir ''et al.'') Idoxuridine, trifluridine and vidarabine could be under [[nucleoside analogues]]. Maybe [[cidofovir]] too, although I believe it's a nucleo''t''ide analogue. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 20:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
525574 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525571 +++$+++ 525573 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.196914800E09 +++$+++ I've tried it out [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3AAntivirals&diff=175994280&oldid=175984246 here].  +++$+++ ::I've tried it out [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AAntivirals&diff=175994280&oldid=175984246 here]. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 20:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
525575 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525571 +++$+++ 525574 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.196915460E09 +++$+++ That was quick -- thanks! -- +++$+++ :::That was quick -- thanks! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian|talk]]) 20:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
525576 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525571 +++$+++ 525575 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.196921340E09 +++$+++ No problem :)  +++$+++ ::::No problem :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 22:09, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

1284 +++$+++ Calistemon +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1284 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-28 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.296285840E09 +++$+++ Just had a look and noticed you have been very busy creating Berlin football club articles, there is almost a hundred of them now! Just wondering, in regards to [[BBC S\xfcdost Berlin]], should it not rather be [[BBC S\xfcdost]]? After all, written out full, the articles name would currently read '''Berliner Ballspiel-Club S\xfcdost Berlin'''.  +++$+++ Just had a look and noticed you have been very busy creating Berlin football club articles, there is almost a hundred of them now! Just wondering, in regards to [[BBC Südost Berlin]], should it not rather be [[BBC Südost]]? After all, written out full, the articles name would currently read '''Berliner Ballspiel-Club Südost Berlin'''. [[User:Calistemon|Calistemon]] ([[User talk:Calistemon|talk]]) 23:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
1285 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1284 +++$+++ 1284 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.296336960E09 +++$+++ Greetings to you and your wife and daughter. You're safely away from the flooding on the west coast I gather. Keep well.  +++$+++ :Greetings to you and your wife and daughter. You're safely away from the flooding on the west coast I gather. Keep well. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 13:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
1286 +++$+++ Calistemon +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1284 +++$+++ 1285 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.296370680E09 +++$+++ Yes, we are safely away from the flooding. We will have a cyclone (in Perth!!!) pass south of us this afternoon, apparently the first since 1989, but otherwise things are fine.  +++$+++ ::Yes, we are safely away from the flooding. We will have a cyclone (in Perth!!!) pass south of us this afternoon, apparently the first since 1989, but otherwise things are fine. [[User:Calistemon|Calistemon]] ([[User talk:Calistemon|talk]]) 22:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

263429 +++$+++ Cohesion +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263429 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-04 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.146759060E09 +++$+++ I thought I would leave you a comment while you were working to scare you ;) Nice to see you are an admin now, more image admins yipee :D - ''' +++$+++ I thought I would leave you a comment while you were working to scare you ;) Nice to see you are an admin now, more image admins yipee :D - '''[[User:Cohesion|cohesion]]''' 09:11, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
263430 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263429 +++$+++ 263429 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.146759180E09 +++$+++ Yeah, seeing that orange box was one of those \"what have I done wrong now?\" moments. :)  +++$+++ :Yeah, seeing that orange box was one of those "what have I done wrong now?" moments. :) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

1289 +++$+++ Calistemon +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-28 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.304018820E09 +++$+++ Just updating the Bavarian club articles and came upon your article, [[Gr\xfcn-Wei\xdf Ingolstadt]]. Its really not overly notable and has, to my knowledge never achieved anything in Bavarian football. Have you got any special reason for creating it, Wiggy? If not, do you mind me nominating it for deletion? Its only a stub and not really worth updating and keeping in my view. But if you want to hang on to it, I won't nominate it. Cheers,  +++$+++ Just updating the Bavarian club articles and came upon your article, [[Grün-Weiß Ingolstadt]]. Its really not overly notable and has, to my knowledge never achieved anything in Bavarian football. Have you got any special reason for creating it, Wiggy? If not, do you mind me nominating it for deletion? Its only a stub and not really worth updating and keeping in my view. But if you want to hang on to it, I won't nominate it. Cheers, [[User:Calistemon|Calistemon]] ([[User talk:Calistemon|talk]]) 12:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
1290 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1289 +++$+++ 1289 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.304051220E09 +++$+++ Hmm. I have no idea why I even started the thing or where I heard of it from. It should probably go. Thanks.  +++$+++ * Hmm. I have no idea why I even started the thing or where I heard of it from. It should probably go. Thanks. [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 21:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
1291 +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1289 +++$+++ 1290 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.304051460E09 +++$+++ Oop. Now I get it. GW was one of the clubs listed and linked at the [[Ingolstadt]] page. I came across the link when I was working on articles for the other clubs listed and did the bare minimum for GW rather than leave it as a red-link. That's my story and I'm sticking to it!  +++$+++ ** Oop. Now I get it. GW was one of the clubs listed and linked at the [[Ingolstadt]] page. I came across the link when I was working on articles for the other clubs listed and did the bare minimum for GW rather than leave it as a red-link. That's my story and I'm sticking to it! [[User:Wiggy!|Wiggy!]] ([[User talk:Wiggy!#top|talk]]) 21:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
1292 +++$+++ Calistemon +++$+++ Wiggy! +++$+++ 1289 +++$+++ 1291 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.304057040E09 +++$+++ At least you remembered. There is a few articles I've created that I wouldn't bother about nowadays. Stay or go, what do you say? The only two articles linking there are Ingolstadt and [[Bajram Nebihi]], an football player of questionable notability himself.  +++$+++ :::At least you remembered. There is a few articles I've created that I wouldn't bother about nowadays. Stay or go, what do you say? The only two articles linking there are Ingolstadt and [[Bajram Nebihi]], an football player of questionable notability himself. [[User:Calistemon|Calistemon]] ([[User talk:Calistemon|talk]]) 23:04, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

263435 +++$+++ Dr.Boogins +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263435 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-04 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.146808680E09 +++$+++ If you read the article you will see that the person is \"notable\".  There are external links providing proof of how notable Ruadhri Conroy is.  As for the photo, I was unable to resize it.  Please reconsider the deletion. -- +++$+++ If you read the article you will see that the person is "notable".  There are external links providing proof of how notable Ruadhri Conroy is.  As for the photo, I was unable to resize it.  Please reconsider the deletion. --[[User:Dr.Boogins|Dr.Boogins]] 22:58, 04 May 2006 (UTC)
263436 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263435 +++$+++ 263435 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.146807060E09 +++$+++ It's gone now - exactly what are the claims to notability? Remember that ''two'' separate editors decided that it should be deleted (one person to nominate; one person -- me -- to delete).  +++$+++ *It's gone now - exactly what are the claims to notability? Remember that ''two'' separate editors decided that it should be deleted (one person to nominate; one person -- me -- to delete). [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

525581 +++$+++ Jeff Dahl +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-15 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.197780900E09 +++$+++ [[Template:{{ucfirst:Retinoids}}]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#{{{2|Template:{{ucfirst:Retinoids}}}}}|the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice-->  +++$+++ [[Template:{{ucfirst:Retinoids}}]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#{{{2|Template:{{ucfirst:Retinoids}}}}}|the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> [[User:Jeff Dahl|Jeff Dahl]] ([[User talk:Jeff Dahl|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jeff Dahl|contribs]]) 20:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
525582 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525581 +++$+++ 525581 +++$+++ 2007-12-15 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.197781140E09 +++$+++ Based on the new format of [[Template:Carotenoids]], I have no objection to [[Template:Retinoids]] being merged into it. -- +++$+++ :Based on the new format of [[Template:Carotenoids]], I have no objection to [[Template:Retinoids]] being merged into it. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 20:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

263439 +++$+++ John the mackem +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-05 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.146854400E09 +++$+++ Somebody took it out, I put it back. Season ain't over yet...  +++$+++ Somebody took it out, I put it back. Season ain't over yet... [[User:John the mackem|John the mackem]] 11:40, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
263440 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263439 +++$+++ 263439 +++$+++ 2006-05-08 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.147107240E09 +++$+++ Hello. I deleted the article via easy consensus at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Milan Agarwal]].  I agree that notability can be subjective, but our [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|guidelines]] help us make it more transparent. Unfortunately we get so much 'stupid crap' from students who think that their band\/film club -- we have to be consistent. I'm sure the Asian Business Association is held in very high regard in UCB, but I very much doubt the rest of the world cares. Regards.  +++$+++ :Hello. I deleted the article via easy consensus at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milan Agarwal]].  I agree that notability can be subjective, but our [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|guidelines]] help us make it more transparent. Unfortunately we get so much 'stupid crap' from students who think that their band/film club -- we have to be consistent. I'm sure the Asian Business Association is held in very high regard in UCB, but I very much doubt the rest of the world cares. Regards. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:54, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

263441 +++$+++ Striver +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-08 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.147122180E09 +++$+++ I created [[Steve Watson (researcher)]], and it got speedied. Could i ask you to undelete it? Thanks. -- +++$+++ I created [[Steve Watson (researcher)]], and it got speedied. Could i ask you to undelete it? Thanks. --[[User:Striver|Striver]] 14:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
263442 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263441 +++$+++ 263441 +++$+++ 2006-05-08 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.147122720E09 +++$+++ Hi. It was nominated as a speedy by someone else, and I agreed, and deleted it. It offered very little assertion of nobility. Take it to [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] if you want, but I feel that it met the speedy comfortably. Best.  +++$+++ :Hi. It was nominated as a speedy by someone else, and I agreed, and deleted it. It offered very little assertion of nobility. Take it to [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] if you want, but I feel that it met the speedy comfortably. Best. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

525587 +++$+++ Invertzoo +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525587 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-22 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.198387980E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much Arcadian, for your excellent work on cleaning up the Andropause article, and attempting to give it NPOV. For a while there before you got to it, it was a real embarrassment to the name of Wikipedia ! Let's hope it stays in good shape now. If it runs downhill into a mess again, I may call on you or another expert for some more help with it.  +++$+++ Thank you so much Arcadian, for your excellent work on cleaning up the Andropause article, and attempting to give it NPOV. For a while there before you got to it, it was a real embarrassment to the name of Wikipedia ! Let's hope it stays in good shape now. If it runs downhill into a mess again, I may call on you or another expert for some more help with it. [[User:Invertzoo|Invertzoo]] ([[User talk:Invertzoo|talk]]) 21:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
525588 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525587 +++$+++ 525587 +++$+++ 2007-12-22 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.198389180E09 +++$+++ I'm glad to be of service now, and in the future. Since I've done one thing of use to you, let me ask you to do two things for me. :) Could you take a look at [[Climacteric (biology)]]? I recently disambiguated it from [[Climacteric (astrology)]], but the article needs help, and judging from your user page, you would be an excellent resource. (Obviously, one of the major challenges in these articles is the clear definition of closely overlapping terms.) Also -- if you feel that the major issues with andropause have been addressed, would you mind removing the tags at the top of the page? I wouldn't feel comfortable doing it myself, since I've made so many other edits to the page recently. -- +++$+++ :I'm glad to be of service now, and in the future. Since I've done one thing of use to you, let me ask you to do two things for me. :) Could you take a look at [[Climacteric (biology)]]? I recently disambiguated it from [[Climacteric (astrology)]], but the article needs help, and judging from your user page, you would be an excellent resource. (Obviously, one of the major challenges in these articles is the clear definition of closely overlapping terms.) Also -- if you feel that the major issues with andropause have been addressed, would you mind removing the tags at the top of the page? I wouldn't feel comfortable doing it myself, since I've made so many other edits to the page recently. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 21:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

263445 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Good day...  When creating the \"FunFurious\" article, I was trying to make it more appropriate and it was deleted before I was able to understand which principles I had not conformed to.  I posted it again, making every attempt to conform to the \"Tollerant\" Wiki standards, and you deleted it as well.  I tried to explain that I was doing my best, but that apparently wasn't good enough.  I know I am slow, and you guys have to rocket through thousands of these a day, but what should I have done differently???  FunFurious is a viable entity in our area, and is original.  Thanks for your help.  Snowman 16:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ Good day...  When creating the "FunFurious" article, I was trying to make it more appropriate and it was deleted before I was able to understand which principles I had not conformed to.  I posted it again, making every attempt to conform to the "Tollerant" Wiki standards, and you deleted it as well.  I tried to explain that I was doing my best, but that apparently wasn't good enough.  I know I am slow, and you guys have to rocket through thousands of these a day, but what should I have done differently???  FunFurious is a viable entity in our area, and is original.  Thanks for your help.  Snowman 16:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
263446 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263445 +++$+++ 263445 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.147217940E09 +++$+++ Hello! Thing is, we can't have an article about every website or forum out there, otherwise we'll have 11 year old AOL users advertising their site. See [[Wikipedia:Notability (web)]]. Thanks for getting in touch, and I hope you decide to stick around :)  +++$+++ :Hello! Thing is, we can't have an article about every website or forum out there, otherwise we'll have 11 year old AOL users advertising their site. See [[Wikipedia:Notability (web)]]. Thanks for getting in touch, and I hope you decide to stick around :) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
263447 +++$+++ Mtz206 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263445 +++$+++ 263446 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.147219260E09 +++$+++ The article's content has now been added to [[User:Davesnow]]'s userpage. I'll put a message on the user's talk page, but is there proper process to delete inappropriate userpage content? -- +++$+++ ::The article's content has now been added to [[User:Davesnow]]'s userpage. I'll put a message on the user's talk page, but is there proper process to delete inappropriate userpage content? --[[User:Mtz206|mtz206]] 17:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
263448 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263445 +++$+++ 263447 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.147219860E09 +++$+++ I think there is a procedure, somewhere -- I haven't used it yet so I'd have to go digging. I think 'inappropriate content' is mainly to do with disparaging people\/pornographic images, etc. The best info is at [[Wikipedia:User pages]]  +++$+++ :::I think there is a procedure, somewhere -- I haven't used it yet so I'd have to go digging. I think 'inappropriate content' is mainly to do with disparaging people/pornographic images, etc. The best info is at [[Wikipedia:User pages]] [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
263449 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263445 +++$+++ 263446 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I have no problem removing the link if that's all.  As a group, we are working on Incorporation, though probably will do so under a different name.  But this has been our group name for some time here in the Decatur, GA area, and noone else uses the name (why would they!) - If you google us, you only get links related to us.  (And some random unrelated wedding dress typo.)  We don't need the advertising. Snowman 17:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ ::I have no problem removing the link if that's all.  As a group, we are working on Incorporation, though probably will do so under a different name.  But this has been our group name for some time here in the Decatur, GA area, and noone else uses the name (why would they!) - If you google us, you only get links related to us.  (And some random unrelated wedding dress typo.)  We don't need the advertising. Snowman 17:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
263450 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263445 +++$+++ 263449 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.147221000E09 +++$+++ I'm not overly bothered about it, but, yes, generally it's not a good idea to advertise on Wikipedia. If you don't need the advertising, then its probably best to delete it. Good luck, tho'  +++$+++ :::I'm not overly bothered about it, but, yes, generally it's not a good idea to advertise on Wikipedia. If you don't need the advertising, then its probably best to delete it. Good luck, tho' [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
263451 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263445 +++$+++ 263450 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ That's easy - No complaints here...  If I repost it, am I going to have a problem - I don't want to get flagged for vandalism...  Snowman 17:37, 9 May 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ ::::That's easy - No complaints here...  If I repost it, am I going to have a problem - I don't want to get flagged for vandalism...  Snowman 17:37, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
263452 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263445 +++$+++ 263451 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.147221660E09 +++$+++ People are more tolerant of user pages than 'main space'. If someone has a problem with it they should politely let you know first. All I'd say is don't recreate [[FunFurious]].  +++$+++ :::::People are more tolerant of user pages than 'main space'. If someone has a problem with it they should politely let you know first. All I'd say is don't recreate [[FunFurious]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

525592 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-28 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.198914240E09 +++$+++ You created this redirect a long long time ago, should this be a separate page from [[candidiasis]]? -- +++$+++ You created this redirect a long long time ago, should this be a separate page from [[candidiasis]]? --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 23:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
525593 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525592 +++$+++ 525592 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.198914480E09 +++$+++ Mmm probably not. But if we want to increase site traffic we might think about creating [[vaginal yeast infection]]. -- +++$+++ :Mmm probably not. But if we want to increase site traffic we might think about creating [[vaginal yeast infection]]. --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 23:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

1305 +++$+++ EricR +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-21 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.177191360E09 +++$+++ Would you please take the time to read over [[Wikipedia:Reference desk\/guidelines|the reference desk guidelines]]: \"The reference desk is '''not''' a chatroom or forum, nor is it a soapbox for promoting your own opinions. Editors should rather attempt to represent [[WP:NPOV|fairly and without bias]] significant views published by [[WP:RS| reliable sources]].\" Your recent additions on the Humanities desk ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk\/Humanities&diff=124590768&oldid=124590265], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk\/Humanities&diff=124590265&oldid=124588999]) are, i think, not really compatible with that guideline.&mdash; +++$+++ Would you please take the time to read over [[Wikipedia:Reference desk/guidelines|the reference desk guidelines]]: "The reference desk is '''not''' a chatroom or forum, nor is it a soapbox for promoting your own opinions. Editors should rather attempt to represent [[WP:NPOV|fairly and without bias]] significant views published by [[WP:RS| reliable sources]]." Your recent additions on the Humanities desk ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities&diff=124590768&oldid=124590265], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities&diff=124590265&oldid=124588999]) are, i think, not really compatible with that guideline.&mdash;[[User:EricR|eric]] 14:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
1306 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1305 +++$+++ 1305 +++$+++ 2007-04-22 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.177270020E09 +++$+++ What I really don't like is some overeager perfectionist who thinks that he is a censor and then points to some arbitrary rules as guidelines (\"I am only obeying the law.\"). This is in my humble opinion a major flaw of Wikipedia: a \"good\"-minded cabal finds something wrong and then puts up some awfull rules which everybody is suppossed to obey or else... Screw that censor atittude, screw the cabals, and screw these rules.  +++$+++ :What I really don't like is some overeager perfectionist who thinks that he is a censor and then points to some arbitrary rules as guidelines ("I am only obeying the law."). This is in my humble opinion a major flaw of Wikipedia: a "good"-minded cabal finds something wrong and then puts up some awfull rules which everybody is suppossed to obey or else... Screw that censor atittude, screw the cabals, and screw these rules. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] 12:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
1307 +++$+++ StuRat +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1305 +++$+++ 1306 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.178374380E09 +++$+++ [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]], I'd like to invite you to participate in the writing of the rules, so your concerns about them being used to censor people, or any other concerns, can be taken into account: [[Wikipedia talk:Reference desk\/guidelines]].  +++$+++ ::[[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]], I'd like to invite you to participate in the writing of the rules, so your concerns about them being used to censor people, or any other concerns, can be taken into account: [[Wikipedia talk:Reference desk/guidelines]]. [[User:StuRat|StuRat]] 07:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
1308 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1305 +++$+++ 1305 +++$+++ 2007-05-04 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.178340480E09 +++$+++ Second, I think that you are blinding yourself because of your national feelings. The most common term for the islands is currently \"British Isles\". I know that the Irish don't like it, but what can I say? It is the most used term. If you think that you can waltz into Wikipedia armed as a national hero I must warn you to grow a thick skin. Wikipedia is supposed to accurate, national feelings be damned. If you can demonstrate me that another term is used more often then I will gladly improve the article.  +++$+++ :Second, I think that you are blinding yourself because of your national feelings. The most common term for the islands is currently "British Isles". I know that the Irish don't like it, but what can I say? It is the most used term. If you think that you can waltz into Wikipedia armed as a national hero I must warn you to grow a thick skin. Wikipedia is supposed to accurate, national feelings be damned. If you can demonstrate me that another term is used more often then I will gladly improve the article. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] 21:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
1309 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1305 +++$+++ 1305 +++$+++ 2007-05-07 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.178607180E09 +++$+++ To judge the ppl of classical antiquity (or the middle ages) by modern standards and morals is simply being naive, self-rightous, political correct, and hipocrit (despite of that everybody does it, but that is clearly POV). All these precious morals quickly fall aside in the hell of war. How about the bombing of Dresden? How about Hiroshima and Nagasaki? If such actions are not senseless (have a true military purpose - ending the war asap) they are justified. Hey, it's '''War''', and '''War is Hell''' (if the mob truly thought on this truth they wouldn't scream: WAR! quite so often). Civilians are even today too many times valid military targets. It begins with the workers of the factories of war material, then with the workers of war supplies (food for the troops and the civilian population), and alltoo soon it goes on and on. In the end you bomb whole cities. I know that in our increasingly political correct world such a view is considred amoral, evil, etc. Such persons dream of a pretty pink 'civilized' war where everybody follows 'the rules' and they get amazed that in reality that nobody follows them. They don't study history or war and then scream about its brutality. Let me point out that in Iraq war nearly 200 persons are dying every single day and nobody gives a rat's ass. So much for the value of modern political correctnes and morals.  +++$+++ :To judge the ppl of classical antiquity (or the middle ages) by modern standards and morals is simply being naive, self-rightous, political correct, and hipocrit (despite of that everybody does it, but that is clearly POV). All these precious morals quickly fall aside in the hell of war. How about the bombing of Dresden? How about Hiroshima and Nagasaki? If such actions are not senseless (have a true military purpose - ending the war asap) they are justified. Hey, it's '''War''', and '''War is Hell''' (if the mob truly thought on this truth they wouldn't scream: WAR! quite so often). Civilians are even today too many times valid military targets. It begins with the workers of the factories of war material, then with the workers of war supplies (food for the troops and the civilian population), and alltoo soon it goes on and on. In the end you bomb whole cities. I know that in our increasingly political correct world such a view is considred amoral, evil, etc. Such persons dream of a pretty pink 'civilized' war where everybody follows 'the rules' and they get amazed that in reality that nobody follows them. They don't study history or war and then scream about its brutality. Let me point out that in Iraq war nearly 200 persons are dying every single day and nobody gives a rat's ass. So much for the value of modern political correctnes and morals. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] 23:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

525594 +++$+++ Strandwolf +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525594 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-29 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.198936740E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, I proposed the deletion of your creation [[Centromere protein B]], but somebody removed my tag. Since I know nothing about such things, I may have been mistaken. But I wonder if you could add some information to the article explaining what the protein does, why it is important and so forth?  +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, I proposed the deletion of your creation [[Centromere protein B]], but somebody removed my tag. Since I know nothing about such things, I may have been mistaken. But I wonder if you could add some information to the article explaining what the protein does, why it is important and so forth? [[User:Strandwolf|Strandwolf]] ([[User talk:Strandwolf|talk]]) 05:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
525595 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525594 +++$+++ 525594 +++$+++ 2007-12-31 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.199156280E09 +++$+++ An expansion of the article by [[User:ProteinBoxBot]] should be coming soon. -- +++$+++ :An expansion of the article by [[User:ProteinBoxBot]] should be coming soon. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 18:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
525596 +++$+++ Strandwolf +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525594 +++$+++ 525595 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.207405680E09 +++$+++ Well, it's been months, article is exactly the same...  +++$+++ ::Well, it's been months, article is exactly the same... [[User:Strandwolf|Strandwolf]] ([[User talk:Strandwolf|talk]]) 07:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

263453 +++$+++ childzy +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263453 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-09 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.147224000E09 +++$+++ I understand if you cannot unblock it but I had to ask Thanks.-- +++$+++ I understand if you cannot unblock it but I had to ask Thanks.--[[User:Childzy|Childzy]] 18:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
263454 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263453 +++$+++ 263453 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.147224600E09 +++$+++ I've attempted to unblock the IP for you (should be OK in a couple of minutes). My block was based on the page full of warnings and previous blocks. It's one of those cases were a few pricks are spoiling it for genuine editors. I don't know how to solve that, other than attempt to educate other members of your network (a poster on the noticeboard?)  +++$+++ :I've attempted to unblock the IP for you (should be OK in a couple of minutes). My block was based on the page full of warnings and previous blocks. It's one of those cases were a few pricks are spoiling it for genuine editors. I don't know how to solve that, other than attempt to educate other members of your network (a poster on the noticeboard?) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

1310 +++$+++ Lucius Sempronius Turpio +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-30 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.185802320E09 +++$+++ So with that said, and even if you personally dont really reconize the Holy Roman Empire as a true western heir, it is fact that 1806 is the date the state was taken off maps, and it should be considered to have that 1806 date be the \"offical\" Roman Empire end.-- +++$+++ So with that said, and even if you personally dont really reconize the Holy Roman Empire as a true western heir, it is fact that 1806 is the date the state was taken off maps, and it should be considered to have that 1806 date be the "offical" Roman Empire end.--[[User:Lucius Sempronius Turpio|Lucius Sempronius Turpio]] 06:32, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
1311 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1310 +++$+++ 1310 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.186391400E09 +++$+++ May I ask where the Roman Empire was on the \"hypotical\" map from 396 to 800? Where was it in 477? If you assume the name of somebody else who has died 400 years ago and get everyone to accept your name as true does that make you the same person? I don't think so.  +++$+++ :May I ask where the Roman Empire was on the "hypotical" map from 396 to 800? Where was it in 477? If you assume the name of somebody else who has died 400 years ago and get everyone to accept your name as true does that make you the same person? I don't think so. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] 02:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
1312 +++$+++ Lucius Sempronius Turpio +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1310 +++$+++ 1310 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.186498200E09 +++$+++ I feel it was Germany plus fragments of the ressurected [[Western Empire]] mutated in a medieval form, although on wikipedia my opinion isnt whats important, whats important is the Roman name was offically taken off maps in 1806, and that is notable enough to consider having the offical end date of the empire not in 476, or in the 1400's at the fall of the eastern or [[Byzantine Empire]], but 1806 when the last emperor [[Francis II]] stepped down to [[Napoleon]].-- +++$+++ * I feel it was Germany plus fragments of the ressurected [[Western Empire]] mutated in a medieval form, although on wikipedia my opinion isnt whats important, whats important is the Roman name was offically taken off maps in 1806, and that is notable enough to consider having the offical end date of the empire not in 476, or in the 1400's at the fall of the eastern or [[Byzantine Empire]], but 1806 when the last emperor [[Francis II]] stepped down to [[Napoleon]].--[[User:Lucius Sempronius Turpio|Lucius Sempronius Turpio]] 07:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

263457 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-10 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.147312080E09 +++$+++ Please also zap the above. Thanks. - <b> +++$+++ Please also zap the above. Thanks. - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|CrazyRussian]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Crzrussian|contribs]]/[[Special:Emailuser/Crzrussian|email]]</small> 18:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
263458 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263457 +++$+++ 263457 +++$+++ 2006-05-10 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.147312140E09 +++$+++ done.  +++$+++ :done. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

525602 +++$+++ DMLudwinski +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-10 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.199969100E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, if you get a moment to look at [[Talk:Neuroblastoma]], especially the mess I left referring to phase III clinical trials for frontline therapy for high-risk disease, I'll be interested in what you think should be done (if anything) to make the article more thorough...thanks!  +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, if you get a moment to look at [[Talk:Neuroblastoma]], especially the mess I left referring to phase III clinical trials for frontline therapy for high-risk disease, I'll be interested in what you think should be done (if anything) to make the article more thorough...thanks! [[User:DMLudwinski|DMLudwinski]] ([[User talk:DMLudwinski|talk]]) 04:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
525603 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525602 +++$+++ 525602 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.199969640E09 +++$+++ Are you formatting the references by hand, or are you using http:\/\/diberri.dyndns.org\/wikipedia\/templates\/ ? -- +++$+++ :Are you formatting the references by hand, or are you using http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/templates/ ? --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 04:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
525604 +++$+++ DMLudwinski +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525602 +++$+++ 525603 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.200026940E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much Arcadian! That is a BIG improvement over doing refs manually! I also found a site the searched for DOI--do you have any recommendations for that? Thanks! --[[Special:Contributions\/208.123.11.69|208.123.11.69]] ([[User talk:208.123.11.69|talk]]) 20:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Ugh! Login issues again! -- +++$+++ ::Thanks so much Arcadian! That is a BIG improvement over doing refs manually! I also found a site the searched for DOI--do you have any recommendations for that? Thanks! --[[Special:Contributions/208.123.11.69|208.123.11.69]] ([[User talk:208.123.11.69|talk]]) 20:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Ugh! Login issues again! --[[User:DMLudwinski|DMLudwinski]] ([[User talk:DMLudwinski|talk]]) 20:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
525605 +++$+++ DMLudwinski +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525602 +++$+++ 525604 +++$+++ 2008-03-04 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.204620660E09 +++$+++ thanks SO much Arcadian for the help on formating the image of ganglioneuroblastoma. Obviously I am having trouble! Any hints? I really tried. I was trying to figure it out without having to bother you! Thanks for coming to the rescue!  +++$+++ :::thanks SO much Arcadian for the help on formating the image of ganglioneuroblastoma. Obviously I am having trouble! Any hints? I really tried. I was trying to figure it out without having to bother you! Thanks for coming to the rescue! [[User:DMLudwinski|DMLudwinski]] ([[User talk:DMLudwinski|talk]]) 00:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
525606 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525602 +++$+++ 525605 +++$+++ 2008-03-04 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.204621080E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Extended image syntax]] has a useful overview. -- +++$+++ ::::[[Wikipedia:Extended image syntax]] has a useful overview. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 00:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
525607 +++$+++ DMLudwinski +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525602 +++$+++ 525606 +++$+++ 2008-03-14 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.205494500E09 +++$+++ Wow--you are incredible at catching and fixing vandalism lightening fast! THANK YOU!!! I see you have rescued [[neuroblastoma]] article once again!  +++$+++ :::::Wow--you are incredible at catching and fixing vandalism lightening fast! THANK YOU!!! I see you have rescued [[neuroblastoma]] article once again! [[User:DMLudwinski|DMLudwinski]] ([[User talk:DMLudwinski|talk]]) 04:35, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

1315 +++$+++ ConfuciusOrnis +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-16 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.189984560E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've moved your report to [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Personal_insults_and_uncivil_behaviour.2C_by_part_of_User:Saoirsegodeohf|here]], generally for issues like yours the AN\/I page is the appropriate place to bring that up. <b><font face=\"courier\" color=\"#737CA1\"> +++$+++ Hi, I've moved your report to [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Personal_insults_and_uncivil_behaviour.2C_by_part_of_User:Saoirsegodeohf|here]], generally for issues like yours the AN/I page is the appropriate place to bring that up. <b><font face="courier" color="#737CA1">[[User:ConfuciusOrnis|ornis]]</font></b> <small><b><font color="#C11B17">([[User talk:ConfuciusOrnis|t]])</font></b></small> 16:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
1316 +++$+++ ConfuciusOrnis +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1315 +++$+++ 1315 +++$+++ 2007-09-16 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.189985520E09 +++$+++ replied on my talk. <b><font face=\"courier\" color=\"#737CA1\"> +++$+++ :replied on my talk. <b><font face="courier" color="#737CA1">[[User:ConfuciusOrnis|ornis]]</font></b> <small><b><font color="#C11B17">([[User talk:ConfuciusOrnis|t]])</font></b></small> 16:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

1317 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1317 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-16 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.189985820E09 +++$+++ Restore the affected articles?  I'm not sure what you mean.  Any changes can be changed, but don't [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]] and if there's disagreement you can't solve easily consider [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution avenues]].  You can revert any changes, but be aware of the [[WP:3RR|three revert rule]] and discuss things on the talk page.  If there's anything else, just ask.  +++$+++ Restore the affected articles?  I'm not sure what you mean.  Any changes can be changed, but don't [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]] and if there's disagreement you can't solve easily consider [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution avenues]].  You can revert any changes, but be aware of the [[WP:3RR|three revert rule]] and discuss things on the talk page.  If there's anything else, just ask. [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 16:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
1318 +++$+++ Jerrch +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1317 +++$+++ 1317 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.191127260E09 +++$+++ I support your idea. But it runs into the issue of the pre-1947 ROC..., etc. But I think it can be easily solved if all editors agree with us. For example the pre-1947 ROC can be called Nationalist China or something like that.-- +++$+++ :I support your idea. But it runs into the issue of the pre-1947 ROC..., etc. But I think it can be easily solved if all editors agree with us. For example the pre-1947 ROC can be called Nationalist China or something like that.--[[User:Jerrch|<span style="color:green">Jerry</span>]] 21:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
1319 +++$+++ Jerrch +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1317 +++$+++ 1318 +++$+++ 2007-10-26 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.193462160E09 +++$+++ I started a new discussion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_%28Chinese%29#Renaming.2FMerging_China-related_articles here], I hope you can give some more of your opinions too. Thanks.-- +++$+++ ::I started a new discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_%28Chinese%29#Renaming.2FMerging_China-related_articles here], I hope you can give some more of your opinions too. Thanks.--[[User:Jerrch|<span style="color:green">Jerry</span>]] 22:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1320 +++$+++ Jerrch +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1317 +++$+++ 1319 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.193545140E09 +++$+++ My point is that I think ROC should be split into two articles, ''Taiwan'' and ''Republican China'' (I don't really care about PRC being moved), because I don't like it when people confuse Taiwan with China. (I don't think I would ever turn to their side, don't worry) But keep in mind, Wikipedia is not a battleground, that's a policy, so we should keep cool and stuff.-- +++$+++ :::My point is that I think ROC should be split into two articles, ''Taiwan'' and ''Republican China'' (I don't really care about PRC being moved), because I don't like it when people confuse Taiwan with China. (I don't think I would ever turn to their side, don't worry) But keep in mind, Wikipedia is not a battleground, that's a policy, so we should keep cool and stuff.--[[User:Jerrch|<span style="color:green">Jerry</span>]] 21:19, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
1321 +++$+++ Jerrch +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1317 +++$+++ 1319 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.193545560E09 +++$+++ Also, see [[User:DownUnder555\/sandbox|this]], I think we can work toward that direction.-- +++$+++ :::Also, see [[User:DownUnder555/sandbox|this]], I think we can work toward that direction.--[[User:Jerrch|<span style="color:green">Jerry</span>]] 21:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

263464 +++$+++ 139.168.189.5 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-11 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.147365600E09 +++$+++ '''''Fuck you'''''  +++$+++ '''''Fuck you''''' [[User:139.168.189.5|139.168.189.5]] 09:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
263465 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263464 +++$+++ 263464 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.147367640E09 +++$+++ Enjoy your block.  +++$+++ :Enjoy your block. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:14, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

525609 +++$+++ Halogenated +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525609 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-24 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.201230240E09 +++$+++ I don't believe using the term \"impaired\" human cognitive ability is entirely accurate, as the drugs are proposed as substances that improve this regardless.  Whether they work or not it in question, although their more legitimate use does seem to be in cass where impairment has occurred (e.g. Alzheimers).  Perhaps it would be better to rephrase this to reflect this. +++$+++ I don't believe using the term "impaired" human cognitive ability is entirely accurate, as the drugs are proposed as substances that improve this regardless.  Whether they work or not it in question, although their more legitimate use does seem to be in cass where impairment has occurred (e.g. Alzheimers).  Perhaps it would be better to rephrase this to reflect this.[[User:Halogenated|Halogenated]] ([[User talk:Halogenated|talk]]) 19:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
525610 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525609 +++$+++ 525609 +++$+++ 2008-01-25 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.201251780E09 +++$+++ Have you read the definition of [[nootropic]] in [[Dorland's Medical Dictionary]] (the ref I added)? Of course, if you can find support for your view in a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]], feel free to add it. -- +++$+++ :Have you read the definition of [[nootropic]] in [[Dorland's Medical Dictionary]] (the ref I added)? Of course, if you can find support for your view in a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]], feel free to add it. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 01:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

263466 +++$+++ Mtz206 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263466 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-11 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.147373940E09 +++$+++ I noticed you placed a tag on [[Talk:Alex Jones (radio)]] indicating that Alex Jones himself edits under the account [[User:Striver]]. How do you know this? -- +++$+++ I noticed you placed a tag on [[Talk:Alex Jones (radio)]] indicating that Alex Jones himself edits under the account [[User:Striver]]. How do you know this? --[[User:Mtz206|mtz206]] 11:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
263467 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263466 +++$+++ 263466 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.147374300E09 +++$+++ His introduction on his User page says he is Alex Jones and the fact that he edits articles about Alex Jones' webhost and radio show guest and that fact that someone has just advertised Alex Jone's web host's AFD on his talk page.  +++$+++ :His introduction on his User page says he is Alex Jones and the fact that he edits articles about Alex Jones' webhost and radio show guest and that fact that someone has just advertised Alex Jone's web host's AFD on his talk page. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
263468 +++$+++ Mtz206 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263466 +++$+++ 263467 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.147374900E09 +++$+++ No, his User page states \"I am ''a Alex Jones loving'' Human male...\" (emphasis added). He loves Alex Jones, but makes no indication he is AJ. I could heavily edit [[Barry Manilow]]-related articled, but that doesn't make me Mr. Manilow. I'm removing the tag at [[Talk:Alex Jones (radio)]]. -- +++$+++ ::No, his User page states "I am ''a Alex Jones loving'' Human male..." (emphasis added). He loves Alex Jones, but makes no indication he is AJ. I could heavily edit [[Barry Manilow]]-related articled, but that doesn't make me Mr. Manilow. I'm removing the tag at [[Talk:Alex Jones (radio)]]. --[[User:Mtz206|mtz206]] 12:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
263469 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263466 +++$+++ 263468 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.147375020E09 +++$+++ Ah, in that case I do apologise. My honest mistake. Thanks for checking.  +++$+++ :::Ah, in that case I do apologise. My honest mistake. Thanks for checking. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

525611 +++$+++ FQ1513 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-27 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.201424760E09 +++$+++ Please excuse my ignorance. -  +++$+++ Please excuse my ignorance. - [[User:FQ1513|FQ1513]] ([[User talk:FQ1513|talk]]) 01:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
525612 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525611 +++$+++ 525611 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.201425420E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Helminthic_therapy&diff=186636686&oldid=186624286 My edit] was referring to the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]]. More specifically, [[Wikipedia:Lead_section#Sections_and_table_of_contents]] states \"Although the lead section is considered a section, it has no section heading; an \"Introduction\" headline should not be added at the beginning of an article.\" -- +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Helminthic_therapy&diff=186636686&oldid=186624286 My edit] was referring to the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]]. More specifically, [[Wikipedia:Lead_section#Sections_and_table_of_contents]] states "Although the lead section is considered a section, it has no section heading; an "Introduction" headline should not be added at the beginning of an article." --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 01:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

87602 +++$+++ Goldrushcavi +++$+++ Mtstroud +++$+++ 87602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.171976100E09 +++$+++ Hello Mtstroud, I reverted your edit on the scheduling section of LMAD because of its wordiness, the inclusion of the TV shows it ran against (not really necessary nor appropriate for an encyclopedia article - takes away from the main focus of the article), and it was unsourced.  This information would be much better for a fan website.  Please check out \"[[WP:NOT#IINFO|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information]]\" for rationale on the reversion.  Thanks! -- +++$+++ Hello Mtstroud, I reverted your edit on the scheduling section of LMAD because of its wordiness, the inclusion of the TV shows it ran against (not really necessary nor appropriate for an encyclopedia article - takes away from the main focus of the article), and it was unsourced.  This information would be much better for a fan website.  Please check out "[[WP:NOT#IINFO|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information]]" for rationale on the reversion.  Thanks! --[[User:Goldrushcavi|Goldrushcavi]] 04:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
87603 +++$+++ Goldrushcavi +++$+++ Mtstroud +++$+++ 87602 +++$+++ 87602 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.172035500E09 +++$+++ I completely understand your wanting to include the information and why you consider it important, but it is also unsourced and as such falls under [[Wikipedia:original research|original research]], which is also not allowed.  I don't know who we're supposed to \"go before\" if we have a disagreement (I know it's somewhere in the Wikipedia manual), but this would be a good opportunity to do so. - +++$+++ :I completely understand your wanting to include the information and why you consider it important, but it is also unsourced and as such falls under [[Wikipedia:original research|original research]], which is also not allowed.  I don't know who we're supposed to "go before" if we have a disagreement (I know it's somewhere in the Wikipedia manual), but this would be a good opportunity to do so. -[[User:Goldrushcavi|Goldrushcavi]] 21:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

263471 +++$+++ Matthew Platts +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-11 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.147374900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your offer. Incidentally, your (apparent) place of work and user ID suggest you may be one particular [[academic]] of my acquaintance in [[meatspace]]. It's only faintly possible but if so, we met a few weeks ago. Hi!  +++$+++ Thanks for your offer. Incidentally, your (apparent) place of work and user ID suggest you may be one particular [[academic]] of my acquaintance in [[meatspace]]. It's only faintly possible but if so, we met a few weeks ago. Hi! [[User:Matthew Platts|Matthew Platts]] 12:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
263472 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263471 +++$+++ 263471 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.147375140E09 +++$+++ Mmm, I'm curious. I used to have more details on my user page about my place of work, but info was becoming abused by vandals I'd encountered...  +++$+++ :Mmm, I'm curious. I used to have more details on my user page about my place of work, but info was becoming abused by vandals I'd encountered... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:19, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
263473 +++$+++ Matthew Platts +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263471 +++$+++ 263472 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.147377480E09 +++$+++ Heh. If you don't recognise me immediately then you're not who I think you are. But that's fair enough. Actually, there is something I'd like to recruit you for. Any advice on how I can get rounded enough to become an admin?  +++$+++ ::Heh. If you don't recognise me immediately then you're not who I think you are. But that's fair enough. Actually, there is something I'd like to recruit you for. Any advice on how I can get rounded enough to become an admin? [[User:Matthew Platts|Matthew Platts]] 12:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
263474 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263471 +++$+++ 263473 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.147393440E09 +++$+++ Mmm, if you're going from two of my initials, there is someone else in my department who goes under that name. As for admin status: well, you need to prove you have a good knowledge of policy and are civil and mature. A few regulars have standards: [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Standards]]. My nomination just arrived from someone -- I didn't ask for it.  +++$+++ :::Mmm, if you're going from two of my initials, there is someone else in my department who goes under that name. As for admin status: well, you need to prove you have a good knowledge of policy and are civil and mature. A few regulars have standards: [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Standards]]. My nomination just arrived from someone -- I didn't ask for it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
263475 +++$+++ Matthew Platts +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263471 +++$+++ 263474 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.147453320E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Helpful as always. Greet your colleague from me!  +++$+++ ::::Thank you. Helpful as always. Greet your colleague from me! [[User:Matthew Platts|Matthew Platts]] 10:02, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
263476 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263471 +++$+++ 263471 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.147378320E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article failed to assert notability: see [[WP:MUSIC]].  +++$+++ :Hi. The article failed to assert notability: see [[WP:MUSIC]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

1330 +++$+++ Malcolm XIV +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-18 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.205823660E09 +++$+++ Been saving that up, have you? Well done. I don't quite see how it applies, however.  +++$+++ Been saving that up, have you? Well done. I don't quite see how it applies, however. [[User:Malcolm XIV|Malcolm XIV]] ([[User talk:Malcolm XIV|talk]]) 00:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
1331 +++$+++ Malcolm XIV +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1330 +++$+++ 1330 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.205852760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your very civil response. In fact, it appears that your comment was directed at [[User:Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM]] rather than me. Apologies.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your very civil response. In fact, it appears that your comment was directed at [[User:Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM]] rather than me. Apologies. [[User:Malcolm XIV|Malcolm XIV]] ([[User talk:Malcolm XIV|talk]]) 08:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

263477 +++$+++ Superarthur +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-13 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.147555980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Superarthur|Arthur]] 14:33, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
263478 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263477 +++$+++ 263477 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.147558080E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article failed to assert notability: see [[WP:BIO]].  +++$+++ :Hi. The article failed to assert notability: see [[WP:BIO]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
263479 +++$+++ Superarthur +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263477 +++$+++ 263478 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.147559640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Superarthur|Arthur]] 15:34, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
263480 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263477 +++$+++ 263479 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.147560300E09 +++$+++ Remember that two people decided the article was inappropriate: one to nominate; the other to delete. If I recall correctly, the article did not meet our style or formatting guidelines. While that is not grounds for deletion in itself, it's not a good for the subject's credibility. You are correct that it is considerate to notify the editor; I sometimes do that, depending upon how busy I am at the time. Our guidelines are at [[WP:BIO]]. As far as I see, 'Captain Jack' fails to satisfy the requirements.   +++$+++ :::Remember that two people decided the article was inappropriate: one to nominate; the other to delete. If I recall correctly, the article did not meet our style or formatting guidelines. While that is not grounds for deletion in itself, it's not a good for the subject's credibility. You are correct that it is considerate to notify the editor; I sometimes do that, depending upon how busy I am at the time. Our guidelines are at [[WP:BIO]]. As far as I see, 'Captain Jack' fails to satisfy the requirements.  [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:45, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
263481 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263477 +++$+++ 263480 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.147560480E09 +++$+++ BTW, welcome :}  +++$+++ ::::BTW, welcome :} [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
263482 +++$+++ Superarthur +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263477 +++$+++ 263481 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.147563780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::[[User:Superarthur|Arthur]] 16:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

525623 +++$+++ Adrianocorno +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525623 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-25 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.203992340E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for the excellent spring clean of the entry on SCDS. I'm fairly new here and still learning about the technicalities of Wiki, so I've learned something. Greetings from Germany,  +++$+++ Thanks a lot for the excellent spring clean of the entry on SCDS. I'm fairly new here and still learning about the technicalities of Wiki, so I've learned something. Greetings from Germany, [[User:Adrianocorno|Adrianocorno]] ([[User talk:Adrianocorno|talk]]) 18:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
525624 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525623 +++$+++ 525623 +++$+++ 2008-03-01 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.204438980E09 +++$+++ Glad to help. Thank you for creating the article. -- +++$+++ :Glad to help. Thank you for creating the article. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 22:23, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

525625 +++$+++ Kd4ttc +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-25 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.204004880E09 +++$+++ Dysphagia is a symptom, not the same as \"difficulty in swallowing\".  I know the online references and the print references say \"difficulty in swallowing\", but that should be understood in the context that it is used generally as a symptom.  Schlesinger. & Fordtran\u2019s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease explains this well.  That source is more authoritative regarding GI disease than the dictionaries, or from examples where the term is misused in the medical literature.  Please see the discussion regarding dysphagia as a symptom in the talk page.  Stephen Holland, M.D.  +++$+++ Dysphagia is a symptom, not the same as "difficulty in swallowing".  I know the online references and the print references say "difficulty in swallowing", but that should be understood in the context that it is used generally as a symptom.  Schlesinger. & Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease explains this well.  That source is more authoritative regarding GI disease than the dictionaries, or from examples where the term is misused in the medical literature.  Please see the discussion regarding dysphagia as a symptom in the talk page.  Stephen Holland, M.D. [[User:Kd4ttc|Kd4ttc]] ([[User talk:Kd4ttc|talk]]) 21:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
525626 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525625 +++$+++ 525625 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.204020600E09 +++$+++ My full response is at [[Talk:Dysphagia#Definition_issue]], but please read [[Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Behavior_that_is_unacceptable]], and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AArcadian&diff=194022284&oldid=193975157 don't delete comments made by other editors on my talk page]. -- +++$+++ :My full response is at [[Talk:Dysphagia#Definition_issue]], but please read [[Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Behavior_that_is_unacceptable]], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AArcadian&diff=194022284&oldid=193975157 don't delete comments made by other editors on my talk page]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 02:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
525627 +++$+++ Kd4ttc +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525625 +++$+++ 525626 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.204026540E09 +++$+++ I didn't realize that I had deleted the other comment on your talk page when I added this section.  Sorry about that.  The mistake was inadvertent. Steve Holland  +++$+++ ::I didn't realize that I had deleted the other comment on your talk page when I added this section.  Sorry about that.  The mistake was inadvertent. Steve Holland [[User:Kd4ttc|Kd4ttc]] ([[User talk:Kd4ttc|talk]]) 03:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

1339 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-26 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.217065260E09 +++$+++ A Google search won't give me much clue what you used as sources in writing the article. -  +++$+++ A Google search won't give me much clue what you used as sources in writing the article. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 02:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
1340 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1339 +++$+++ 1339 +++$+++ 2008-07-26 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.217066100E09 +++$+++ Ah well yesterday I saw a nice TV documentary in the History channel about Petra, the trade routes, the Nabatean kingdom, and the Roman annexation (it had that guy with the hat a la Indiana Jones). I was amazed about the subject (knew some things about Petra of course, but nothing about the kingdom - and they wrote it with a minor K). Searched in Wikipedia and found a couple of articles which certainly  mention it, but no article truly about it. Searched with Google (one never knows) read a bit here and there, and then resolved to create the article. I guess many articles start in this way. I hope there is no problem but I don't have any book about it. Plenty of books about ancient Rome, but no books about the Nabatean kingdom. Perhaps I will buy one eventually.  +++$+++ :Ah well yesterday I saw a nice TV documentary in the History channel about Petra, the trade routes, the Nabatean kingdom, and the Roman annexation (it had that guy with the hat a la Indiana Jones). I was amazed about the subject (knew some things about Petra of course, but nothing about the kingdom - and they wrote it with a minor K). Searched in Wikipedia and found a couple of articles which certainly  mention it, but no article truly about it. Searched with Google (one never knows) read a bit here and there, and then resolved to create the article. I guess many articles start in this way. I hope there is no problem but I don't have any book about it. Plenty of books about ancient Rome, but no books about the Nabatean kingdom. Perhaps I will buy one eventually. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 02:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
1341 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1339 +++$+++ 1340 +++$+++ 2008-07-26 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.217069760E09 +++$+++ As for ''Nabatean'' \/ ''Nabataean'', you'll probably also find ''Nabat\xe6an''. Just like ''encyclopedia'' \/ ''encyclopaedia'' \/ ''encyclop\xe6dia''. And probably similar in terms of modern vs. archaic spellings. -  +++$+++ ::As for ''Nabatean'' / ''Nabataean'', you'll probably also find ''Nabatæan''. Just like ''encyclopedia'' / ''encyclopaedia'' / ''encyclopædia''. And probably similar in terms of modern vs. archaic spellings. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 03:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

525628 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-25 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.204006740E09 +++$+++ A little while ago you left a ''cri de coeur'' on [[WT:MED]] that [[Henoch-Sch\xf6nlein purpura]] was a mess. I felt guilty (because I'd started the page) and therefore went on a big improvement spree. Could you have a look at the result and counsel me on accessibility of content, grammar, etc. I'd rather this article becomes a [[WP:GA]] at some point...  +++$+++ A little while ago you left a ''cri de coeur'' on [[WT:MED]] that [[Henoch-Schönlein purpura]] was a mess. I felt guilty (because I'd started the page) and therefore went on a big improvement spree. Could you have a look at the result and counsel me on accessibility of content, grammar, etc. I'd rather this article becomes a [[WP:GA]] at some point... [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 22:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
525629 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525628 +++$+++ 525628 +++$+++ 2008-02-29 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.204335840E09 +++$+++ Thank you -- it is much better now. I think it is probably ready for a GA nomination now. -- +++$+++ :Thank you -- it is much better now. I think it is probably ready for a GA nomination now. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 17:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
525630 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525628 +++$+++ 525628 +++$+++ 2008-03-02 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.204528200E09 +++$+++ Nice work on [[Haff disease]] - I had been a bit hesitant to put in those other reports, but now it looks great. How did you find out that I created it?  +++$+++ :Nice work on [[Haff disease]] - I had been a bit hesitant to put in those other reports, but now it looks great. How did you find out that I created it? [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 23:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
525631 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525628 +++$+++ 525630 +++$+++ 2008-03-02 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.204528800E09 +++$+++ I'm [[Omnipresence|everywhere]]...no, actually, it's because I saw [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3APoisoning_and_toxicity&diff=195312948&oldid=173776215 this] on my watchlist, and I wanted to learn what it was. -- +++$+++ ::I'm [[Omnipresence|everywhere]]...no, actually, it's because I saw [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3APoisoning_and_toxicity&diff=195312948&oldid=173776215 this] on my watchlist, and I wanted to learn what it was. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 23:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
525632 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525628 +++$+++ 525628 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.205295300E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, I don't understand the reference. -- +++$+++ :I'm sorry, I don't understand the reference. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 21:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
525633 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525628 +++$+++ 525631 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.205358840E09 +++$+++ From here, I can't tell what Fab you are talking about. However, whenever I add formula information, it is almost always as it appears in [[PubChem]]. If you can tell me the name (or give the URL), I may be able to provide more guidance. -- +++$+++ :::From here, I can't tell what Fab you are talking about. However, whenever I add formula information, it is almost always as it appears in [[PubChem]]. If you can tell me the name (or give the URL), I may be able to provide more guidance. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 14:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
525634 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525628 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-14 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.205550960E09 +++$+++ From [http:\/\/www.drugbank.ca\/cgi-bin\/getCard.cgi?CARD=BTD00041 here], as generated by [http:\/\/diberri.dyndns.org\/wikipedia\/templates\/?type=drugbank this page]. -- +++$+++ :::::From [http://www.drugbank.ca/cgi-bin/getCard.cgi?CARD=BTD00041 here], as generated by [http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/templates/?type=drugbank this page]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 20:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

263487 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263487 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-16 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.147804680E09 +++$+++ Hello. When you created the disambiguation pages for [[Radio 2]] & [[Radio 3]], it meant that over 100 articles are now pointing to those pages. Would you like to help disambiguating the articles so they point to their correct articles? I have already completely DABbed [[Radio 4]]. I find [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser|AWB]] invaluable. Cheers.  +++$+++ Hello. When you created the disambiguation pages for [[Radio 2]] & [[Radio 3]], it meant that over 100 articles are now pointing to those pages. Would you like to help disambiguating the articles so they point to their correct articles? I have already completely DABbed [[Radio 4]]. I find [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser|AWB]] invaluable. Cheers. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
263488 +++$+++ Arctic.gnome +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263487 +++$+++ 263487 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.147820760E09 +++$+++ Sure thing, sorry for the trouble.  I can't use AWB because of my lack of Windows, but I'll do what I can.  -- +++$+++ :Sure thing, sorry for the trouble.  I can't use AWB because of my lack of Windows, but I'll do what I can.  --[[User:Arctic.gnome|Arctic Gnome]] 16:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
263489 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263487 +++$+++ 263488 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.147821240E09 +++$+++ Cheers. The temporary alternative would be to have Radio redirect to BBC Radio 2, and create [[Radio 2 (disambiguation)]]. The top of the BBC Radio 2 page could then have ''Radio 2 redirects here. For other stations named Radio 2, see [[Radio 2 (disambiguation)]]''. This might be better until all the links point directly to their correct articles.  +++$+++ ::Cheers. The temporary alternative would be to have Radio redirect to BBC Radio 2, and create [[Radio 2 (disambiguation)]]. The top of the BBC Radio 2 page could then have ''Radio 2 redirects here. For other stations named Radio 2, see [[Radio 2 (disambiguation)]]''. This might be better until all the links point directly to their correct articles. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
263490 +++$+++ Arctic.gnome +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263487 +++$+++ 263489 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.147822200E09 +++$+++ Don't bother, the disambig process is going pretty quickly.  -- +++$+++ :::Don't bother, the disambig process is going pretty quickly.  --[[User:Arctic.gnome|Arctic Gnome]] 16:30, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

1345 +++$+++ Readin +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1345 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-16 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.229488140E09 +++$+++ I think we would be better off if you remove your comment about Ngchen's statement: \"Your argument that this statement by itself isn't neutral is pointless and simply worthless. \"  It isn't polite or helpful to call someone's statement \"pointless and simply worthless\".  This is especially true when it is someone like Ngchen who has a good record of not going to extremes in either direction.  +++$+++ I think we would be better off if you remove your comment about Ngchen's statement: "Your argument that this statement by itself isn't neutral is pointless and simply worthless. "  It isn't polite or helpful to call someone's statement "pointless and simply worthless".  This is especially true when it is someone like Ngchen who has a good record of not going to extremes in either direction. [[User:Readin|Readin]] ([[User talk:Readin|talk]]) 20:29, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
1346 +++$+++ Readin +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1345 +++$+++ 1345 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.229492040E09 +++$+++ Faced with all these difficulties, and with the knowledge that the influence of the Chinese editors will grow as 1 billion Chinese become richer with more access to the internet and to English education, I would like to see some standards established and am willing to compromise to get them.  Otherwise I suspect that in a few years time the \"China\" article will indeed point to the PRC while the \"Taiwan\" article will be about the island or will talk about how Taiwan is a province of the PRC.  I'm willing to compromise now to avoid an ideological bulldozer in the future.  +++$+++ :Faced with all these difficulties, and with the knowledge that the influence of the Chinese editors will grow as 1 billion Chinese become richer with more access to the internet and to English education, I would like to see some standards established and am willing to compromise to get them.  Otherwise I suspect that in a few years time the "China" article will indeed point to the PRC while the "Taiwan" article will be about the island or will talk about how Taiwan is a province of the PRC.  I'm willing to compromise now to avoid an ideological bulldozer in the future. [[User:Readin|Readin]] ([[User talk:Readin|talk]]) 21:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

525635 +++$+++ Renata3 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.205368260E09 +++$+++ Hi, why would you undo dab page? I know it should be an article, but as of today it's neither an article nor a decent disambiguation page.  +++$+++ Hi, why would you undo dab page? I know it should be an article, but as of today it's neither an article nor a decent disambiguation page. [[User:Renata3|Renata]] ([[User talk:Renata3|talk]]) 17:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
525636 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525635 +++$+++ 525635 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.205787600E09 +++$+++ By converting it to a dab, you removed the external links to the medical dictionaries. Some people consider striated muscle to be equal to skeletal muscle, while others consider it equal to skeletal+cardiac muscle. By retaining article form, we can better explain the reliable sources behind the diversity of interpretations, while still directing readers towards more precise terminology. -- +++$+++ :By converting it to a dab, you removed the external links to the medical dictionaries. Some people consider striated muscle to be equal to skeletal muscle, while others consider it equal to skeletal+cardiac muscle. By retaining article form, we can better explain the reliable sources behind the diversity of interpretations, while still directing readers towards more precise terminology. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 14:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

611894 +++$+++ tjstrf +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-28 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.175142840E09 +++$+++ While the anon may be rather grammar challenged, that wasn't a nonsense post. Naruto has in fact been nominated for best manga (among other things) at least this year and probably last year as well.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ANaruto&diff=118617021&oldid=118616749] -- +++$+++ While the anon may be rather grammar challenged, that wasn't a nonsense post. Naruto has in fact been nominated for best manga (among other things) at least this year and probably last year as well.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ANaruto&diff=118617021&oldid=118616749] --[[User:tjstrf|tjstrf]] <small>[[User talk:tjstrf|talk]]</small> 21:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
611895 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611894 +++$+++ 611894 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.175146740E09 +++$+++ Oh, I'm sorry. I do recall that Naruto volume 7 was awarded the 2006 Quill Award, but that's all I heard. \/\/  +++$+++ :Oh, I'm sorry. I do recall that Naruto volume 7 was awarded the 2006 Quill Award, but that's all I heard. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 22:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
611896 +++$+++ tjstrf +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611894 +++$+++ 611895 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.175149560E09 +++$+++ Not a problem. No need to worry about me interpreting over-formality as sarcasm either, I talk that way in real life. Have you figures out how taskforce organization works yet (for [[WP:BLEACH]])? -- +++$+++ ::Not a problem. No need to worry about me interpreting over-formality as sarcasm either, I talk that way in real life. Have you figures out how taskforce organization works yet (for [[WP:BLEACH]])? --[[User:tjstrf|tjstrf]] <small>[[User talk:tjstrf|talk]]</small> 23:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
611897 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611894 +++$+++ 611896 +++$+++ 2007-03-31 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.175385540E09 +++$+++ Not quite, but I'm gonna to read into it a bit and hopefully it'll be official by the end of today. \/\/  +++$+++ :::Not quite, but I'm gonna to read into it a bit and hopefully it'll be official by the end of today. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 16:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

525638 +++$+++ G716 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-01 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.207047900E09 +++$+++ Regards&mdash;''''' +++$+++ Regards&mdash;'''''[[User:G716|<font color="Purple">G716</font>]]'''''&nbsp;&lt;[[User talk:G716|<sup>T</sup>]]·[[Special:Contributions/G716|<sub>C</sub>]]&gt; 04:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
525639 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525638 +++$+++ 525638 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.207391820E09 +++$+++ When I look at the page, I see your latest edits. This might be an issue with your local browser, or you might be linking to an old version. This test should distinguish between those scenarios -- click on this link: [[nuclear lamina]]. What are the first words you see in the article? -- +++$+++ :When I look at the page, I see your latest edits. This might be an issue with your local browser, or you might be linking to an old version. This test should distinguish between those scenarios -- click on this link: [[nuclear lamina]]. What are the first words you see in the article? --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 03:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

263495 +++$+++ Matthead +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-17 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.147920360E09 +++$+++ Why have you deleted [[Harald Grohs]]? The guys has earned his spot in motorsport history, but that won't appear on Wikipedia if articles are deleted hastily. Please restore Grohs (and others, if any), and use a cleanup tag or something first!-- +++$+++ Why have you deleted [[Harald Grohs]]? The guys has earned his spot in motorsport history, but that won't appear on Wikipedia if articles are deleted hastily. Please restore Grohs (and others, if any), and use a cleanup tag or something first!--[[User:Matthead|Matthead]] 19:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
263496 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263495 +++$+++ 263495 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.147921140E09 +++$+++ Hi. I've just checked, and it was deleted because it was practically empty, which meant that notability wasn't established. There was one line of content. Someone nominated it for speedy deletion under these grounds, and I agreed. Try again, asserting his notability. If you think he's earned his place in Wikipedia, do him some justice by writing an article, rather than a substub. There was no point in using a cleanup tag, because there was hardly anything there to cleanup!  +++$+++ :Hi. I've just checked, and it was deleted because it was practically empty, which meant that notability wasn't established. There was one line of content. Someone nominated it for speedy deletion under these grounds, and I agreed. Try again, asserting his notability. If you think he's earned his place in Wikipedia, do him some justice by writing an article, rather than a substub. There was no point in using a cleanup tag, because there was hardly anything there to cleanup! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
263497 +++$+++ Matthead +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263495 +++$+++ 263496 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.147926720E09 +++$+++ Okay, I made a new, hopefully better attempt. On German Wikipedia, too many motorsport-related article get quickly deleted or attacked otherwise. -- +++$+++ ::Okay, I made a new, hopefully better attempt. On German Wikipedia, too many motorsport-related article get quickly deleted or attacked otherwise. --[[User:Matthead|Matthead]] 21:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
263498 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263495 +++$+++ 263497 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.147927080E09 +++$+++ Aha - ''much'' better! Cheers!  +++$+++ :::Aha - ''much'' better! Cheers! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

525641 +++$+++ Lisapollison +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525641 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-16 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.208341800E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for helping me add cites to the article on Fumarase deficiency. It's wonderful to put out a call for help and have it answered so quickly.  My background is in Anthropology, Linguistics and Folklore.  This particular article is interesting and deserves to be beefed up and well-referenced.  Many thanks.  +++$+++ Thanks so much for helping me add cites to the article on Fumarase deficiency. It's wonderful to put out a call for help and have it answered so quickly.  My background is in Anthropology, Linguistics and Folklore.  This particular article is interesting and deserves to be beefed up and well-referenced.  Many thanks. [[User:Lisapollison|LiPollis]] ([[User talk:Lisapollison|talk]]) 03:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
525642 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525641 +++$+++ 525641 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.208343300E09 +++$+++ And thank you for your initiative and improvements. -- +++$+++ :And thank you for your initiative and improvements. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 03:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

263499 +++$+++ Asbl +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-19 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.148075340E09 +++$+++ Why did you delete the image? (what does i4 mean?) -- +++$+++ Why did you delete the image? (what does i4 mean?) --[[User:Asbl|Asbl]] 14:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
263500 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263499 +++$+++ 263499 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.148075580E09 +++$+++ Hello. 'I4' is a [[Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Images.2FMedia|speedy delete criteria]] meaning that the image had been tagged as having no source for at least 7 days. You should always provide a source for your images, aswell as a tag. This is made clear in the image upload process.  +++$+++ :Hello. 'I4' is a [[Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Images.2FMedia|speedy delete criteria]] meaning that the image had been tagged as having no source for at least 7 days. You should always provide a source for your images, aswell as a tag. This is made clear in the image upload process. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
263501 +++$+++ Asbl +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263499 +++$+++ 263500 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.148076900E09 +++$+++ I thought I fixed the licensing issue last week. -- +++$+++ ::I thought I fixed the licensing issue last week. --[[User:Asbl|Asbl]] 15:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
263502 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263499 +++$+++ 263501 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.148077320E09 +++$+++ You didn't. You added the <nowiki>{{PD-USGov}}<\/nowiki> tag -- that is not the source. You need ''both'' a tag and a source.  +++$+++ :::You didn't. You added the <nowiki>{{PD-USGov}}</nowiki> tag -- that is not the source. You need ''both'' a tag and a source. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
263503 +++$+++ Asbl +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263499 +++$+++ 263502 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.148078160E09 +++$+++ OK, please restore the image, I'll look for the source -- +++$+++ ::::OK, please restore the image, I'll look for the source --[[User:Asbl|Asbl]] 15:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
263504 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263499 +++$+++ 263503 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.148080020E09 +++$+++ Image deletions are not restorable. Upload the image again, and this time, consider using the template at commons for images... as shown on [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Upload this page]. It has a handy table to fill out and if you fill it out correctly, you'll have given the source. Heck, if the image really is PD, upload it to Commons so other projects can make use of it. Hope that helps! '''<font color=\"green\">[[User:Lar\/Esperanza|+]]<\/font><font color=\"blue\">[[Special:Emailuser\/Lar|+]]<\/font>''' +++$+++ :::::Image deletions are not restorable. Upload the image again, and this time, consider using the template at commons for images... as shown on [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload this page]. It has a handy table to fill out and if you fill it out correctly, you'll have given the source. Heck, if the image really is PD, upload it to Commons so other projects can make use of it. Hope that helps! '''<font color="green">[[User:Lar/Esperanza|+]]</font><font color="blue">[[Special:Emailuser/Lar|+]]</font>'''[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 16:07, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

1357 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-06 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.244323680E09 +++$+++ Whatever you think was wrong with that edit, that reply is simply uncalled for. I see nothing in there showing anything like any disrespect toward anyone, and the size increase of the article (only 24 characters!) was trivial in the extreme. I'm trying to assume good faith here, but all I can come up with is that you irrationally hate the terms \"BCE\" and \"CE\" and took your aggression out on the editor who added them. Please try not to overreact in the future, and you might also consider apologizing to the newbie in question.  +++$+++ Whatever you think was wrong with that edit, that reply is simply uncalled for. I see nothing in there showing anything like any disrespect toward anyone, and the size increase of the article (only 24 characters!) was trivial in the extreme. I'm trying to assume good faith here, but all I can come up with is that you irrationally hate the terms "BCE" and "CE" and took your aggression out on the editor who added them. Please try not to overreact in the future, and you might also consider apologizing to the newbie in question. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] ([[User talk:DreamGuy|talk]]) 14:28, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
1358 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1357 +++$+++ 1357 +++$+++ 2009-06-06 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.244355720E09 +++$+++ The compromise in Wikipedia is reasonable and should be respected. Sneaky changes are to be reverted with extreme prejudice.  +++$+++ *The compromise in Wikipedia is reasonable and should be respected. Sneaky changes are to be reverted with extreme prejudice. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 23:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
1359 +++$+++ Unschool +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1357 +++$+++ 1358 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.244376300E09 +++$+++ By the way, though I do, as I said earlier, prefer the BC\/AD system, I doubt very much that it will be around fifty years from now, except as an anachronism <sub>(ah, the irony of ''that'' being an \"anachronism\", eh?)<\/sub>.  Happy editing to you.  +++$+++ ::By the way, though I do, as I said earlier, prefer the BC/AD system, I doubt very much that it will be around fifty years from now, except as an anachronism <sub>(ah, the irony of ''that'' being an "anachronism", eh?)</sub>.  Happy editing to you. [[User:Unschool|<font color="52A249">'''Un'''</font>]][[User talk:Unschool|<font color="23CE40">'''sch'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Unschool|<font color="7ED324">'''ool'''</font>]] 05:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
1360 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1357 +++$+++ 1359 +++$+++ 2009-09-21 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.253523720E09 +++$+++ This view was held fifty years ago, too; not to mention [[French Revolutionary Calendar|two hundred and more]]. If we live, I expect to be having this conversation in fifty years time.  +++$+++ :::This view was held fifty years ago, too; not to mention [[French Revolutionary Calendar|two hundred and more]]. If we live, I expect to be having this conversation in fifty years time. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 02:02, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

525648 +++$+++ Arthroscopist +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525648 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-29 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.209500340E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Arthroscopist|Arthroscopist]] ([[User talk:Arthroscopist|talk]]) 13:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
525649 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525648 +++$+++ 525648 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.209520320E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your contributions! I've added one of your images to [[Medial meniscus]] and another to [[Tear of meniscus]]. If you click on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Medial_meniscus&diff=209053811&oldid=201588217 this link] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tear_of_meniscus&diff=209055790&oldid=202841256 this link], you can see the formatting I used. There are several different ways to add images to pages, and an overview at [[Wikipedia:Picture tutorial]] is available. [[Wikipedia:Be bold|Be bold]], but if you have any specific questions, feel free to ask. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for your contributions! I've added one of your images to [[Medial meniscus]] and another to [[Tear of meniscus]]. If you click on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Medial_meniscus&diff=209053811&oldid=201588217 this link] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tear_of_meniscus&diff=209055790&oldid=202841256 this link], you can see the formatting I used. There are several different ways to add images to pages, and an overview at [[Wikipedia:Picture tutorial]] is available. [[Wikipedia:Be bold|Be bold]], but if you have any specific questions, feel free to ask. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 18:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

263505 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263505 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-19 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.148090340E09 +++$+++ All the images, unless otherwise stated where taken from kryptonsite. They were either screencaps from the trailers or promotional images that the site receives. Instead of being difficult, if you already know that it is a promotional image and it says \"screenshot\", then please, go ahead and change it. I spent an hour and a half going through all the pictures, that are still available, and adding all the appropriate information that I could think of to provide there sources. Forgive me, if by chance I put screenshot instead of promo pic. Like I said, if you already know the answer then please feel free to change it, instead of just labeling it wrong. You can simply go to the site and go to that episode and view the image yourself.  +++$+++ All the images, unless otherwise stated where taken from kryptonsite. They were either screencaps from the trailers or promotional images that the site receives. Instead of being difficult, if you already know that it is a promotional image and it says "screenshot", then please, go ahead and change it. I spent an hour and a half going through all the pictures, that are still available, and adding all the appropriate information that I could think of to provide there sources. Forgive me, if by chance I put screenshot instead of promo pic. Like I said, if you already know the answer then please feel free to change it, instead of just labeling it wrong. You can simply go to the site and go to that episode and view the image yourself. [[User:Bignole|Bignole]] 18:59, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
263506 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263505 +++$+++ 263505 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.148099820E09 +++$+++ I'm not being difficult.The idea is to inform you of your mistakes in an attempt to stop you making them again. Remember [[WP:AGF|AGF]].  +++$+++ :I'm not being difficult.The idea is to inform you of your mistakes in an attempt to stop you making them again. Remember [[WP:AGF|AGF]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:37, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
263507 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263505 +++$+++ 263506 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.148130360E09 +++$+++ Well, unless it occurred every time, you cannot assume it was a mistake that I would need to stop making. When you are basically copying and pasting the same source material for every image you are bound to make a mistake once in awhile, especially when it isn't clear that it is a promotional image or a screenshot. My point is that if I made a \"typo\" (which is what it really was, because it was nothing more than me rushing to get all the sources in before the images were deleted, again) then you can take it upon yourself to correct it, and then simply inform me of what I did and what you did to correct it. You can take the initiative, it's ok. +++$+++ ::Well, unless it occurred every time, you cannot assume it was a mistake that I would need to stop making. When you are basically copying and pasting the same source material for every image you are bound to make a mistake once in awhile, especially when it isn't clear that it is a promotional image or a screenshot. My point is that if I made a "typo" (which is what it really was, because it was nothing more than me rushing to get all the sources in before the images were deleted, again) then you can take it upon yourself to correct it, and then simply inform me of what I did and what you did to correct it. You can take the initiative, it's ok.[[User:Bignole|Bignole]] 06:06, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
263508 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263505 +++$+++ 263507 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.148143740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the sarcasm. I deal with dozens of images everyday and I try to be proactive. It's also polite to communicate. AGF. I appreciate it whne others inform me of mistakes I make. I also find it polite to thank them for it, whether ot not I thought it was needed.  +++$+++ :::Thanks for the sarcasm. I deal with dozens of images everyday and I try to be proactive. It's also polite to communicate. AGF. I appreciate it whne others inform me of mistakes I make. I also find it polite to thank them for it, whether ot not I thought it was needed. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
263509 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263505 +++$+++ 263506 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.148158080E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm sarcastic because you were rather snive when you were telling about my \"mistakes\". People make mistakes, and they way you were addressing it was like you don't make any. And yes, it was snive when you said \"The idea is to inform you of your mistakes in an attempt to stop you from making them again.\" +++$+++ ::Well, I'm sarcastic because you were rather snive when you were telling about my "mistakes". People make mistakes, and they way you were addressing it was like you don't make any. And yes, it was snive when you said "The idea is to inform you of your mistakes in an attempt to stop you from making them again."[[User:Bignole|Bignole]] 13:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
263510 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263505 +++$+++ 263509 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.148182560E09 +++$+++ Assume good faith and be careful before namecalling. By the way, your source for that 'promotional' image is not a press kit. Therefore we can not accept it.  +++$+++ :::Assume good faith and be careful before namecalling. By the way, your source for that 'promotional' image is not a press kit. Therefore we can not accept it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:36, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

1362 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1362 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-21 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.250919780E09 +++$+++ Are you pretty familiar with ancient Roman history (Scipio, Cato, Gracchi and the like)?-- +++$+++ Are you pretty familiar with ancient Roman history (Scipio, Cato, Gracchi and the like)?--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 22:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1363 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1362 +++$+++ 1362 +++$+++ 2009-08-22 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.250982180E09 +++$+++ More or less, but I'm truly little more than an amateur.  +++$+++ :More or less, but I'm truly little more than an amateur. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 16:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
1364 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1362 +++$+++ 1363 +++$+++ 2009-08-22 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.250995080E09 +++$+++ O.K. That may be good enough. I may want to ask you a couple of questions then. Can you e-mail me?-- +++$+++ ::O.K. That may be good enough. I may want to ask you a couple of questions then. Can you e-mail me?--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 19:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
1365 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1362 +++$+++ 1364 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.251075900E09 +++$+++ You can place your questions here. Anonymity is to treasured, and I'm not afraid of revealing the extents of my ignorance.  +++$+++ :::You can place your questions here. Anonymity is to treasured, and I'm not afraid of revealing the extents of my ignorance. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 18:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
1366 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1362 +++$+++ 1365 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.251097080E09 +++$+++ I have too many trollers following me since I am an active editor, so I can not ask any controversial questions here live. Don't be surprised if some will even respond to this simple message. If you don't want to email, then that is alright. It just had to do with [[Scipio the Younger]] and [[Lucius Aemilius Paulus Macedonicus]] which I can probably get somewhere. I'm studying Plutarch's [[Parallel Lives|Lives]] and it probably is there.-- +++$+++ ::::I have too many trollers following me since I am an active editor, so I can not ask any controversial questions here live. Don't be surprised if some will even respond to this simple message. If you don't want to email, then that is alright. It just had to do with [[Scipio the Younger]] and [[Lucius Aemilius Paulus Macedonicus]] which I can probably get somewhere. I'm studying Plutarch's [[Parallel Lives|Lives]] and it probably is there.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 23:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

262371 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-23 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.295797440E09 +++$+++ I have placed the review on hold. Thanks,  +++$+++ I have placed the review on hold. Thanks, [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 07:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
262372 +++$+++ Steven Walling +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262371 +++$+++ 262371 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.295936220E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to say nice job on an important article. :-) <font style=\"font-family: Georgia\"> +++$+++ :I just wanted to say nice job on an important article. :-) <font style="font-family: Georgia">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]</font> 22:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
262373 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262371 +++$+++ 262372 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.295936400E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I'm tossing around the idea of a FAC run with it, so if you stumble across any independent sources I've missed, or see any holes in the coverage, please let me know.  +++$+++ ::Thank you! I'm tossing around the idea of a FAC run with it, so if you stumble across any independent sources I've missed, or see any holes in the coverage, please let me know. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

525653 +++$+++ KC Panchal +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-03 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.209861900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:KC Panchal|Ketan Panchal, MBBS]] ([[User talk:KC Panchal|talk]]) 17:45, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
525654 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525653 +++$+++ 525653 +++$+++ 2008-05-04 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.209891120E09 +++$+++ I think you give me more credit than I've earned, but that does not mean I do not appreciate your encouragement and generous spirit. Thank you, and I hope we cross paths someday. -- +++$+++ :I think you give me more credit than I've earned, but that does not mean I do not appreciate your encouragement and generous spirit. Thank you, and I hope we cross paths someday. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 01:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

1368 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-21 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.253565960E09 +++$+++ IF you care to, can you tell me if the Scipio and Aemilius Paulus writings at least make some sense to you. Thanks.-- +++$+++ IF you care to, can you tell me if the Scipio and Aemilius Paulus writings at least make some sense to you. Thanks.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 13:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
1369 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1368 +++$+++ 1368 +++$+++ 2009-09-21 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.253568360E09 +++$+++ Sorry but I can't help you. I read books written by modern historians (Goldsworthy, etc). I do not read the original ancient classics (have a few translations). As I said: I'm truly little more than an amateur.  +++$+++ :Sorry but I can't help you. I read books written by modern historians (Goldsworthy, etc). I do not read the original ancient classics (have a few translations). As I said: I'm truly little more than an amateur. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 14:26, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
1370 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1368 +++$+++ 1369 +++$+++ 2009-09-21 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.253577720E09 +++$+++ O.K. Thanks for your reply.-- +++$+++ ::O.K. Thanks for your reply.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 17:02, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

525659 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-16 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.210925340E09 +++$+++ Could use an expert, I thought you might be interested!   +++$+++ Could use an expert, I thought you might be interested!  [[User:WLU|WLU]] ([[User talk:WLU|talk]]) 01:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
525660 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525659 +++$+++ 525659 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.210927200E09 +++$+++ I'm no expert, but I've added some refs; hope this helps. -- +++$+++ :I'm no expert, but I've added some refs; hope this helps. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 01:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

263517 +++$+++ Lil crazy thing +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-23 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.148428740E09 +++$+++ i dont need it explain to be about uploading images i've uploaded plenty using that template and putting wwe.com which is the source so its given so nothing can be done, now no one else has ever commented on it or had a problem with it since ive joined here and theres hundreds of pictures on this site with that tag and with just wwe.com, so i have correctly upload an image as it has the copyright tag and the source.  +++$+++ i dont need it explain to be about uploading images i've uploaded plenty using that template and putting wwe.com which is the source so its given so nothing can be done, now no one else has ever commented on it or had a problem with it since ive joined here and theres hundreds of pictures on this site with that tag and with just wwe.com, so i have correctly upload an image as it has the copyright tag and the source. [[User:Lil crazy thing|Lil crazy thing]] 16:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
263518 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263517 +++$+++ 263517 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.148428860E09 +++$+++ That's fine, but there's more people uploading images than there are policing them. That means there is often a delay before people start commenting on them of have \"a problem with it\".  +++$+++ :That's fine, but there's more people uploading images than there are policing them. That means there is often a delay before people start commenting on them of have "a problem with it". [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

263519 +++$+++ Lil crazy thing +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263519 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-23 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.148433360E09 +++$+++ But theres pictures that have been there since last year and there is nothing on them, check every single picture on the pages of the wrestlers and you will see there exactly the same and have been there months and nothing has been done. I dont accept and will not accept being singled out which i am being. Feydey is the only person on this site that has ever had a problem said there is no source when wwe.com is classed as a source, and seeing as wwe.com changes it url's daily putting a url is less of a source and going to that url you will most the time not find it as it will not work. +++$+++ But theres pictures that have been there since last year and there is nothing on them, check every single picture on the pages of the wrestlers and you will see there exactly the same and have been there months and nothing has been done. I dont accept and will not accept being singled out which i am being. Feydey is the only person on this site that has ever had a problem said there is no source when wwe.com is classed as a source, and seeing as wwe.com changes it url's daily putting a url is less of a source and going to that url you will most the time not find it as it will not work.[[User:Lil crazy thing|Lil crazy thing]] 18:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
263520 +++$+++ Feydey +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263519 +++$+++ 263519 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.148435520E09 +++$+++ So how can it be verified that the images are really from wwe.com's page? Because following copyright rules cannot be a matter of faith.  +++$+++ :So how can it be verified that the images are really from wwe.com's page? Because following copyright rules cannot be a matter of faith. [[User:Feydey|feydey]] 18:52, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
263521 +++$+++ Lil crazy thing +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263519 +++$+++ 263520 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.148436000E09 +++$+++ How can it be verified giving a url when they change or get removed daily. I am following the rules i've put a template and the source more then what many have done for there pictures.  +++$+++ :: How can it be verified giving a url when they change or get removed daily. I am following the rules i've put a template and the source more then what many have done for there pictures. [[User:Lil crazy thing|Lil crazy thing]] 19:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
263522 +++$+++ Feydey +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263519 +++$+++ 263521 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.148438100E09 +++$+++ Good point: \"How can it be verified giving a url when they change or get removed daily\" - but if You cannot find a source then the images will get still deleted. Wikipedia policy requires that. How can [[:Image:Mickiechamp.jpg]] have a valid source for weeks and You cannot produce it even to 1 of the articles. It just seems You haven't copied them from wwe.com. I will put back the notices, do not remove them unless You have added valid URLs, not just wwe.com.  +++$+++ :::Good point: "How can it be verified giving a url when they change or get removed daily" - but if You cannot find a source then the images will get still deleted. Wikipedia policy requires that. How can [[:Image:Mickiechamp.jpg]] have a valid source for weeks and You cannot produce it even to 1 of the articles. It just seems You haven't copied them from wwe.com. I will put back the notices, do not remove them unless You have added valid URLs, not just wwe.com. [[User:Feydey|feydey]] 19:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
263523 +++$+++ Feydey +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263519 +++$+++ 263521 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.148438100E09 +++$+++ Notice to The_JPS, this is my 3rd rv. i'm not going further (3RR). It's Your call after this.  +++$+++ :::Notice to The_JPS, this is my 3rd rv. i'm not going further (3RR). It's Your call after this. [[User:Feydey|feydey]] 19:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
263524 +++$+++ Lil crazy thing +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263519 +++$+++ 263519 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.148438340E09 +++$+++ how can you say i havent copied them off wwe.com when you havent even looked, but the fact still remains they do 100% come from wwe.com as you can only get them pictures from there and i stick by my statement until you go around adding that tag to all the other pictures that are exactly like mine and to the ones in articles that have nothing at all then i will not accept it simple as that but you've done nothing at all to all the others, i've included a tag and a source which are both correct and i've never once since i've joined been told its wrong because its what everyone else puts and nothing is done because nothing is wrong. i have stated my reasons over and over again which you are blantly not taking any notice of. Just because your an admin doesnt mean i will back down in what i think.   +++$+++ : how can you say i havent copied them off wwe.com when you havent even looked, but the fact still remains they do 100% come from wwe.com as you can only get them pictures from there and i stick by my statement until you go around adding that tag to all the other pictures that are exactly like mine and to the ones in articles that have nothing at all then i will not accept it simple as that but you've done nothing at all to all the others, i've included a tag and a source which are both correct and i've never once since i've joined been told its wrong because its what everyone else puts and nothing is done because nothing is wrong. i have stated my reasons over and over again which you are blantly not taking any notice of. Just because your an admin doesnt mean i will back down in what i think.  [[User:Lil crazy thing|Lil crazy thing]] 19:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
263525 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263519 +++$+++ 263519 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.148447820E09 +++$+++ Don't worry: everyone makes mistakes when they're new. It's nice to have someone who is actually willing to learn how to do it properly!! Welcome!  +++$+++ :Don't worry: everyone makes mistakes when they're new. It's nice to have someone who is actually willing to learn how to do it properly!! Welcome! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:17, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

1378 +++$+++ Knepflerle +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.256884680E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Kiev&diff=322826462&oldid=322826307 This] really isn't helpful in the slightest.  Can you please read through the request in full and understand why we are doing the statistic collection '''first''', before reviving all the transliteration\/population\/language decrees\/etymological arguments we've heard a hundred times before?  If you could retract your comment for now and leave it until after the statistics have been collected and discussed it would be a massive help  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kiev&diff=322826462&oldid=322826307 This] really isn't helpful in the slightest.  Can you please read through the request in full and understand why we are doing the statistic collection '''first''', before reviving all the transliteration/population/language decrees/etymological arguments we've heard a hundred times before?  If you could retract your comment for now and leave it until after the statistics have been collected and discussed it would be a massive help [[User:Knepflerle|Knepflerle]] ([[User talk:Knepflerle|talk]]) 23:38, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
1379 +++$+++ Knepflerle +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1378 +++$+++ 1378 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.256885100E09 +++$+++ [[User:Taivo]] has moved the comments to [[User_talk:Taivo#Kyiv Survey Comments]]  +++$+++ :[[User:Taivo]] has moved the comments to [[User_talk:Taivo#Kyiv Survey Comments]] [[User:Knepflerle|Knepflerle]] ([[User talk:Knepflerle|talk]]) 23:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

1381 +++$+++ HappyInGeneral +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-02 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.257196680E09 +++$+++ Hi, sorry for removing [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3APersecution_of_Falun_Gong&action=historysubmit&diff=323457225&oldid=323456875 (this is a joke)] but since it was outside the signature, I was not sure to whom it belongs. Best Regards, -- +++$+++ Hi, sorry for removing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APersecution_of_Falun_Gong&action=historysubmit&diff=323457225&oldid=323456875 (this is a joke)] but since it was outside the signature, I was not sure to whom it belongs. Best Regards, --[[User:HappyInGeneral|HappyInGeneral]] ([[User talk:HappyInGeneral|talk]]) 13:18, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
1382 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1381 +++$+++ 1381 +++$+++ 2009-11-02 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.257198300E09 +++$+++ No problem. I hope that you truly believe me when I say that: objectivity is my only concern here. Saying that Scientology is \"bad\" and Falun Gong is \"good\" is dangerous and a judgment call. I think that we should use similar titles not because I trust the Chinese government (quite the contrary) but because we should be fair. But then I can be mistaken.  +++$+++ :No problem. I hope that you truly believe me when I say that: objectivity is my only concern here. Saying that Scientology is "bad" and Falun Gong is "good" is dangerous and a judgment call. I think that we should use similar titles not because I trust the Chinese government (quite the contrary) but because we should be fair. But then I can be mistaken. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 13:45, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
1383 +++$+++ HappyInGeneral +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1381 +++$+++ 1382 +++$+++ 2009-11-02 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.257202560E09 +++$+++ Have I ever said that Scientology is \"bad\"? I merely present what the sources say. Have you taken a look at [[Talk:Persecution_of_Falun_Gong\/sources]]? -- +++$+++ :: Have I ever said that Scientology is "bad"? I merely present what the sources say. Have you taken a look at [[Talk:Persecution_of_Falun_Gong/sources]]? --[[User:HappyInGeneral|HappyInGeneral]] ([[User talk:HappyInGeneral|talk]]) 14:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

263526 +++$+++ Feydey +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-24 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.148496540E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, I'm pretty relaxed on the headshots that are uploaded (''not'' cropped versions of original images). I consider images as such as having no creativity needed for making. Although professional looking one's I challenge. Just my approach. PS. How's that wwe thing going?  +++$+++ Just to let you know, I'm pretty relaxed on the headshots that are uploaded (''not'' cropped versions of original images). I consider images as such as having no creativity needed for making. Although professional looking one's I challenge. Just my approach. PS. How's that wwe thing going? [[User:Feydey|feydey]] 11:49, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
263527 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263526 +++$+++ 263526 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.148498040E09 +++$+++ As for WWE, I'm unsure... we need wider consensus to cover our backs for those becasue there's going to be a lot of images\/uploaders. Without being too stereotypical, I'm guessing there'll be a lot of 12 year olds out there. When was that tag created, who by, and where is the discussion?  +++$+++ :As for WWE, I'm unsure... we need wider consensus to cover our backs for those becasue there's going to be a lot of images/uploaders. Without being too stereotypical, I'm guessing there'll be a lot of 12 year olds out there. When was that tag created, who by, and where is the discussion? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
263528 +++$+++ Feydey +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263526 +++$+++ 263527 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.148505120E09 +++$+++ Yeah, there is a cost issue f. ex. between television photos and university webpage headshots.  +++$+++ ::Yeah, there is a cost issue f. ex. between television photos and university webpage headshots. [[User:Feydey|feydey]] 14:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
263529 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263526 +++$+++ 263526 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.148599980E09 +++$+++ Trust me, I have already communicated with [[User:Gungadin]] on these issues. A lot of her images were checked by me, and subsequently deleted.  +++$+++ :Trust me, I have already communicated with [[User:Gungadin]] on these issues. A lot of her images were checked by me, and subsequently deleted. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:33, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

525671 +++$+++ Cyclonenim +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-19 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.211255160E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your recent help with [[subcutaneous emphysema]]! Regards, <font face=\"Tahoma\" size=\"2px\">''' +++$+++ Thank you for your recent help with [[subcutaneous emphysema]]! Regards, <font face="Tahoma" size="2px">'''[[User:Cyclonenim|CycloneNimrod]]'''</font><font size="1px"><sup>[[User_talk:Cyclonenim|Talk?]]</sup></font> 20:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
525672 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525671 +++$+++ 525671 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.211411820E09 +++$+++ Glad to help. -- +++$+++ :Glad to help. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 16:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

1386 +++$+++ Quest09 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-09 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.257799320E09 +++$+++ Seeing your posts [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Reference_desk\/Archives\/Humanities\/2009_November_4#did_Hitler_know_allied_countries_would_consider_his_murderous_actions_evil.3F | here] and other of your \"contributions\", I can only hope that the rest of the German society has a better level of historical awareness.  +++$+++ Seeing your posts [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2009_November_4#did_Hitler_know_allied_countries_would_consider_his_murderous_actions_evil.3F | here] and other of your "contributions", I can only hope that the rest of the German society has a better level of historical awareness. [[User:Quest09|Quest09]] ([[User talk:Quest09|talk]]) 12:42, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
1387 +++$+++ Quest09 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1386 +++$+++ 1386 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.257810780E09 +++$+++ You don't expect me to read your post in my talk page, do you?-- +++$+++ :You don't expect me to read your post in my talk page, do you?--[[User:Quest09|Quest09]] ([[User talk:Quest09|talk]]) 15:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
1388 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1386 +++$+++ 1387 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.257820560E09 +++$+++ Not really, but you can read my honest and only answer to you first post (last sentence).  +++$+++ ::Not really, but you can read my honest and only answer to you first post (last sentence). [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 18:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

262375 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-24 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.295929320E09 +++$+++ I've just finished the GA review and left a few minor things that could probably do with a looksee. I was tempted to just slap the little green sticker on it, but I thought you'd appreciate it more if I gave you a little bit of work to do. ;-)  +++$+++ I've just finished the GA review and left a few minor things that could probably do with a looksee. I was tempted to just slap the little green sticker on it, but I thought you'd appreciate it more if I gave you a little bit of work to do. ;-) [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 20:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
262376 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262375 +++$+++ 262375 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.295935320E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I think I've taken care of everything on the review page. And maybe I'm crazy, but it always seems like more of an accomplishment if I have to actually work for the little green whatever-it-is. When a reviewer just passes the article without any comments it seems...anticlimactic.  +++$+++ :Thank you! I think I've taken care of everything on the review page. And maybe I'm crazy, but it always seems like more of an accomplishment if I have to actually work for the little green whatever-it-is. When a reviewer just passes the article without any comments it seems...anticlimactic. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
262377 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262375 +++$+++ 262376 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.295936580E09 +++$+++ My own rather jaundiced view is that if a reviewer can't find anything to comment on then he or she hasn't done their job right, or hasn't read the article. I find it quite easy to find things to complain about, but that's probably just me.  +++$+++ ::My own rather jaundiced view is that if a reviewer can't find anything to comment on then he or she hasn't done their job right, or hasn't read the article. I find it quite easy to find things to complain about, but that's probably just me. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 22:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
262378 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262375 +++$+++ 262377 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.295941020E09 +++$+++ I think some sort of record was set here!   +++$+++ :::I think some sort of record was set here!  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 23:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
262379 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262375 +++$+++ 262378 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.295942580E09 +++$+++ A good one I hope.  +++$+++ ::::A good one I hope. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 00:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
262380 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262375 +++$+++ 262379 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.296011040E09 +++$+++ Um hum...(nodding).  Speed, few problems, Dana has this mastered!  These obscure breed articles are in excellent hands!  (The more complex ones with existing sources are, however, a huge time-consuming pain in the butt.  I'm dreading the day that we must tackle, say, Mustang... =:-O  )   +++$+++ :::::Um hum...(nodding).  Speed, few problems, Dana has this mastered!  These obscure breed articles are in excellent hands!  (The more complex ones with existing sources are, however, a huge time-consuming pain in the butt.  I'm dreading the day that we must tackle, say, Mustang... =:-O  )  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 19:04, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

525677 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525677 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-27 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.211951640E09 +++$+++ I was going to add [[acute aortic syndrome]] to {{tl|Circulatory system pathology}}, but I'm not sure if it's appropriate.  Is it a symptom or a condition (or, duh, a syndrome?)  Anyway, I'll have a go at expanding AAS a bit more but as usual any comment, suggestions, advice, correction or direct editing are welcome.   +++$+++ I was going to add [[acute aortic syndrome]] to {{tl|Circulatory system pathology}}, but I'm not sure if it's appropriate.  Is it a symptom or a condition (or, duh, a syndrome?)  Anyway, I'll have a go at expanding AAS a bit more but as usual any comment, suggestions, advice, correction or direct editing are welcome.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] ([[User talk:WLU|talk]]) 22:14, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
525678 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525677 +++$+++ 525677 +++$+++ 2008-05-27 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.211954400E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure. I've added a few refs in trying to figure it out. It seems like the term is intended as an analogue to [[Acute coronary syndrome]], which itself was only added to [[MeSH]] less than year ago. Part of it depends on what the \"aortic\" refers to: [[aortic valve]] or [[aorta]]? Before I edited it, the article said it was a \"threatening, [[aortic valve]] abnormality\", but from what I read, it seems to be more closely associated with the [[aorta]], rather than the heart itself. I've added a ref to that effect, but there aren't many references to this condition on PubMed. It seems to be an emerging term to describe [[chest pain]] which has been narrowed down to the aorta, but not narrowed down further yet, and could be due to [[aortic dissection]], [[intramural hematoma]], or a few other conditions. I tend to be hesitant to include items in navboxes unless the terminology is supported by at least one infobox resource, and this one isn't. However, if it had to go someplace, I'd put in [[Template:Circulatory and respiratory system symptoms and signs]], in parentheses under \"Chest pain\". -- +++$+++ :I'm not sure. I've added a few refs in trying to figure it out. It seems like the term is intended as an analogue to [[Acute coronary syndrome]], which itself was only added to [[MeSH]] less than year ago. Part of it depends on what the "aortic" refers to: [[aortic valve]] or [[aorta]]? Before I edited it, the article said it was a "threatening, [[aortic valve]] abnormality", but from what I read, it seems to be more closely associated with the [[aorta]], rather than the heart itself. I've added a ref to that effect, but there aren't many references to this condition on PubMed. It seems to be an emerging term to describe [[chest pain]] which has been narrowed down to the aorta, but not narrowed down further yet, and could be due to [[aortic dissection]], [[intramural hematoma]], or a few other conditions. I tend to be hesitant to include items in navboxes unless the terminology is supported by at least one infobox resource, and this one isn't. However, if it had to go someplace, I'd put in [[Template:Circulatory and respiratory system symptoms and signs]], in parentheses under "Chest pain". --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 23:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
525679 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525677 +++$+++ 525678 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.211961420E09 +++$+++ My first change to the text inserted aortic valve, but I later removed it based on other references - I also found it unclear and wasn't able to sort it out based on pubmed abstracts (speaking of pubmed, I did find a variety of abstracts referring to AAS and integrated what I could find after your changes).  Then the version I was working on got erased, so I don't recall anymore where I found it or what the reference was.  I'm quite content to leave it out of any templates for now (and you know about it, so once you're satisfied I trust your ability to slot it into the appropriate template).  I also created [[penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer]] based in part on not wanting a redlinked term and finding a specific reference trying to define the term.  A review would be nice, as always, as well as a quick review of the changes I managed to recover and re-insert in AAS.  Also thinking about creating a page for intramural hematoma, to clean out all the red.  We'll see.  Thanks again for your help, much obliged as always.  Now I've got some orphan tags to add...   +++$+++ ::My first change to the text inserted aortic valve, but I later removed it based on other references - I also found it unclear and wasn't able to sort it out based on pubmed abstracts (speaking of pubmed, I did find a variety of abstracts referring to AAS and integrated what I could find after your changes).  Then the version I was working on got erased, so I don't recall anymore where I found it or what the reference was.  I'm quite content to leave it out of any templates for now (and you know about it, so once you're satisfied I trust your ability to slot it into the appropriate template).  I also created [[penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer]] based in part on not wanting a redlinked term and finding a specific reference trying to define the term.  A review would be nice, as always, as well as a quick review of the changes I managed to recover and re-insert in AAS.  Also thinking about creating a page for intramural hematoma, to clean out all the red.  We'll see.  Thanks again for your help, much obliged as always.  Now I've got some orphan tags to add...  [[User:WLU|WLU]] ([[User talk:WLU|talk]]) 00:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

263534 +++$+++ FrontLine +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-26 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.148673540E09 +++$+++ What I really want if you can delete my account or rename it to something and don't tell me about it so I can forget about this whole thing called Wikipedia.  I am fed up with the POV, constant reverting, not even trying to reach a consensus, soapboxing,  not reading and discussing comments, sockpuppeting and bullying that exists in certain sections of the this Wikipedia.  If you can do this it would be much appreciated.  +++$+++ What I really want if you can delete my account or rename it to something and don't tell me about it so I can forget about this whole thing called Wikipedia.  I am fed up with the POV, constant reverting, not even trying to reach a consensus, soapboxing,  not reading and discussing comments, sockpuppeting and bullying that exists in certain sections of the this Wikipedia.  If you can do this it would be much appreciated. [[User:FrontLine|FrontLine]] 12:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
263535 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263534 +++$+++ 263534 +++$+++ 2006-05-26 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.148675580E09 +++$+++ Hello. I don't know what's upset you so much, but I'm sorry you feel that way. Accounts cannot be deleted -- they just become abandoned... I gree, there are a lot of stressful things about the project: vandals, people who ignore simple copyright rules, and all the things you mention... You just need to shrug your shoulders and remember its only a website. I suggest you just call it a day and forget about the project. Perhaps come back at a time when you have a fresh mind?  +++$+++ :Hello. I don't know what's upset you so much, but I'm sorry you feel that way. Accounts cannot be deleted -- they just become abandoned... I gree, there are a lot of stressful things about the project: vandals, people who ignore simple copyright rules, and all the things you mention... You just need to shrug your shoulders and remember its only a website. I suggest you just call it a day and forget about the project. Perhaps come back at a time when you have a fresh mind? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

1392 +++$+++ Xashaiar +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1392 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-29 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.264801140E09 +++$+++ Do not call me like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Achaemenid_Empire&action=historysubmit&diff=340713459&oldid=340712750 that]. Be civil.  +++$+++ Do not call me like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Achaemenid_Empire&action=historysubmit&diff=340713459&oldid=340712750 that]. Be civil. [[User:Xashaiar|Xashaiar]] ([[User talk:Xashaiar|talk]]) 13:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
1393 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1392 +++$+++ 1392 +++$+++ 2010-01-29 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.264801380E09 +++$+++ It wasn't meant as an insult (afaik Xash isn't an insult), I simply didn't remember your full name. I was in haste to change the text before somebody else reverted my revert.  +++$+++ :It wasn't meant as an insult (afaik Xash isn't an insult), I simply didn't remember your full name. I was in haste to change the text before somebody else reverted my revert. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 13:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
1394 +++$+++ Xashaiar +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1392 +++$+++ 1393 +++$+++ 2010-01-29 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.264801980E09 +++$+++ It is OK. Insulting me was not what my warning was supposed to address. My name is the name of a good person, so do not insult Him. :)  +++$+++ ::It is OK. Insulting me was not what my warning was supposed to address. My name is the name of a good person, so do not insult Him. :) [[User:Xashaiar|Xashaiar]] ([[User talk:Xashaiar|talk]]) 13:53, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

263537 +++$+++ Lady_Aleena +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-26 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.148695380E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Wiki-thanks.png]] for your help and support.<br\/>-- <i> +++$+++ [[Image:Wiki-thanks.png]] for your help and support.<br/>-- <i>[[User:Lady Aleena|Lady Aleena]] </i><span style="font-size:8pt;vertical-align:super;">[[User talk:Lady Aleena|talk]]</span>/<span style="font-size:8pt;vertical-align:sub;">[[Special:Contributions/Lady_Aleena|contribs]]</span> 19:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
263538 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263537 +++$+++ 263537 +++$+++ 2006-05-27 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.148794260E09 +++$+++ Hi. It's not-notable, I'm afraid.  +++$+++ :Hi. It's not-notable, I'm afraid. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
263539 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263537 +++$+++ 263537 +++$+++ 2006-05-29 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.148918700E09 +++$+++ I've already given you an explaination why it was deleted. It was not notable.  +++$+++ :I've already given you an explaination why it was deleted. It was not notable. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
263540 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263537 +++$+++ 263539 +++$+++ 2006-05-29 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.148920800E09 +++$+++ They are notable. The ones you've cited (Heads & Shoulders, etc.) are clearly more notable. They are to encyclopedic interest, therefore. They do not need Wikipedia for advertising.  +++$+++ ::They are notable. The ones you've cited (Heads & Shoulders, etc.) are clearly more notable. They are to encyclopedic interest, therefore. They do not need Wikipedia for advertising. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:40, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
263541 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263537 +++$+++ 263537 +++$+++ 2006-05-29 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.148932200E09 +++$+++ Flattery will get you nowhere ;)  +++$+++ :Flattery will get you nowhere ;) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

525685 +++$+++ KC Panchal +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-17 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.213724280E09 +++$+++ <span style=\"font: small-caps 15px times;\">''' +++$+++ <span style="font: small-caps 15px times;">'''[[User:KC Panchal|<font color="#800080">—Ketan</font><font color="#000000">Panchal</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:KC Panchal|<font color="#2F4F4F">''<small>t</small>aL<big>K</big>''</font>]]'''</sup></span> 10:38, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
525686 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525685 +++$+++ 525685 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.214021940E09 +++$+++ Thank you, and I commend you on your creation of [[Template:Lymphatic flow]], mentioned above. I agree that these articles could use improvement, but I don't think that the situation is as bleak as it looks at first -- for example, we have at least twenty articles dedicated to the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of the kidney. However, there are certainly ways we can do a better job of anticipating the interests of the reader, and helping to guide them to the details they want. I will see what I can do. -- +++$+++ :Thank you, and I commend you on your creation of [[Template:Lymphatic flow]], mentioned above. I agree that these articles could use improvement, but I don't think that the situation is as bleak as it looks at first -- for example, we have at least twenty articles dedicated to the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of the kidney. However, there are certainly ways we can do a better job of anticipating the interests of the reader, and helping to guide them to the details they want. I will see what I can do. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 21:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
525687 +++$+++ KC Panchal +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525685 +++$+++ 525686 +++$+++ 2008-06-27 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.214578500E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I'd somehow missed this reply. I'm learning (by way of missing such replies) that the watchlist isn't exactly very reliable, as it only shows the last change made to a page, and one might miss a intervening changes that one might be looking for (like your reply ;-) ). Well, what you said about kidney kind of only goes on to prove that the [[pancreas]] article is in very bad state (by comparison). To be honest, I also didn't try any further to improve that article. Well, I'll try that in some time to come. Also, it would be nice if you could find some time to go through [[polyclonal B cell response]] that I've self-nominated for FA, and is in some kind of trouble as it does not adhere well enough to the summary style policy as mentioned on its [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Polyclonal B cell response|nomination talk page]]. More important, there's some thing [[#An award|down under]] for you. <span style=\"font: small-caps 15px times;\">''' +++$+++ ::Sorry, I'd somehow missed this reply. I'm learning (by way of missing such replies) that the watchlist isn't exactly very reliable, as it only shows the last change made to a page, and one might miss a intervening changes that one might be looking for (like your reply ;-) ). Well, what you said about kidney kind of only goes on to prove that the [[pancreas]] article is in very bad state (by comparison). To be honest, I also didn't try any further to improve that article. Well, I'll try that in some time to come. Also, it would be nice if you could find some time to go through [[polyclonal B cell response]] that I've self-nominated for FA, and is in some kind of trouble as it does not adhere well enough to the summary style policy as mentioned on its [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Polyclonal B cell response|nomination talk page]]. More important, there's some thing [[#An award|down under]] for you. <span style="font: small-caps 15px times;">'''[[User:KC Panchal|<font color="#800080">—Ketan</font><font color="#000000">Panchal</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:KC Panchal|<font color="#2F4F4F">''<small>t</small>aL<font size=3>K</font>''</font>]]'''</sup></span> 07:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
525688 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525685 +++$+++ 525685 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.214021400E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the invitation. I can't make any promises, but I will take a look. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the invitation. I can't make any promises, but I will take a look. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 21:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

263542 +++$+++ Peripitus +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-29 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.148933700E09 +++$+++ The JPS, perhaps a bit hasty here. creator ( not me ) looked 1\/2 way through creating this one. Ronald Brittain was the red-faced RSM who acted in many british comedy shows etc.. Do I need to go through the undeletion review or is it kosher to start again and write a decent +referenced article ? -  +++$+++ The JPS, perhaps a bit hasty here. creator ( not me ) looked 1/2 way through creating this one. Ronald Brittain was the red-faced RSM who acted in many british comedy shows etc.. Do I need to go through the undeletion review or is it kosher to start again and write a decent +referenced article ? - [[User:Peripitus|Peripitus]] 13:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
263543 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263542 +++$+++ 263542 +++$+++ 2006-05-29 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.148934120E09 +++$+++ I'm confused... I thought it was created by [[User:Snedger]]. At the time of deletion, it showed absolutely no degree of notability. It was about two sentences  long, and neither mentioned the notability you express in your message. Yes, it is kosher to write a decent +referenced article.  +++$+++ :I'm confused... I thought it was created by [[User:Snedger]]. At the time of deletion, it showed absolutely no degree of notability. It was about two sentences  long, and neither mentioned the notability you express in your message. Yes, it is kosher to write a decent +referenced article. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
263544 +++$+++ Peripitus +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263542 +++$+++ 263543 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.148988300E09 +++$+++ Thanks - you're right that there was no notability in the initial article nor any references of any type. I picked it up in new-article-patrol and was researching it when the axe fell. Should have a new one up as soon as I can find a PD or fair use image :-) -  +++$+++ ::Thanks - you're right that there was no notability in the initial article nor any references of any type. I picked it up in new-article-patrol and was researching it when the axe fell. Should have a new one up as soon as I can find a PD or fair use image :-) - [[User:Peripitus|Peripitus]] 04:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
263545 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263542 +++$+++ 263542 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.149005700E09 +++$+++ Sorry, the movie is not notable. Come back when it has been made and has been commercially released in cinemas.  +++$+++ :Sorry, the movie is not notable. Come back when it has been made and has been commercially released in cinemas. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
263546 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263542 +++$+++ 263542 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.149009060E09 +++$+++ There is no evidence that your movie is notable enough for inclusion.  +++$+++ :There is no evidence that your movie is notable enough for inclusion. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
263547 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263542 +++$+++ 263542 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.149016740E09 +++$+++ We have [[Wikipedia:Notability]]. Films are judged on a case by case basis, with some common sense. We'll look to see if it has an entry in IMDb, but even if it has, that is no guarantee that we'll keep it because [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not a database]]. Has it been released commercially? Is the information verifiable? Who has added the article? If it's the director, etc, then it's probably not notable: a good guideline of notability for anyone writing about themselves or their work is that if that the subject is notable enough then ''someone else'' will\/would have already written the article.  +++$+++ :We have [[Wikipedia:Notability]]. Films are judged on a case by case basis, with some common sense. We'll look to see if it has an entry in IMDb, but even if it has, that is no guarantee that we'll keep it because [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not a database]]. Has it been released commercially? Is the information verifiable? Who has added the article? If it's the director, etc, then it's probably not notable: a good guideline of notability for anyone writing about themselves or their work is that if that the subject is notable enough then ''someone else'' will/would have already written the article. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
263548 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263542 +++$+++ 263547 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.149016860E09 +++$+++ P.S. Please sign your comments using <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>  +++$+++ ::P.S. Please sign your comments using <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:21, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

525689 +++$+++ NocturnalA6 2.7 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-19 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.213917540E09 +++$+++ Hello, I noticed that you are the original creator of the article [[Robert Half Internation]]. However, a lot of changed have been made since then, and now the entire article looks like spam. No information for encylopedia purpose has been posted, except that the RHI Highlights sections from their corporate website is copied and pasted. I have added db-spam header to it. Please have a look, and see if you can fix the article or rather have it deleted. Thanks. +++$+++ Hello, I noticed that you are the original creator of the article [[Robert Half Internation]]. However, a lot of changed have been made since then, and now the entire article looks like spam. No information for encylopedia purpose has been posted, except that the RHI Highlights sections from their corporate website is copied and pasted. I have added db-spam header to it. Please have a look, and see if you can fix the article or rather have it deleted. Thanks.[[User:NocturnalA6 2.7|NocturnalA6 2.7]] ([[User talk:NocturnalA6 2.7|talk]]) 16:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
525690 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525689 +++$+++ 525689 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.214022360E09 +++$+++ [[Robert Half International]] is on the [[List of S&P 500 companies]]. I don't think it should be deleted. -- +++$+++ :[[Robert Half International]] is on the [[List of S&P 500 companies]]. I don't think it should be deleted. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 21:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

1402 +++$+++ AnonMoos +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-19 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.279558800E09 +++$+++ I don't conceive that there's a personal quarrel between us, and I'm not approaching the discussions there from that angle.  Unfortunately, however, you for some reason chose to adopt a deliberately and intentionally provocative tone, and seem to feel rather free to dogmatically pontificate at length, even while having only a rather sketchy knowledge of the facts of the situation under discussion.  I'm not the only one who finds this rhetorical strategy on your part to be rather grating (cf. the \"S-O-A-P-B-O-X\" comment made before I ever replied to you at all), nor do I apologize for bringing your far-flung provocations into contact with basic reality, even if I have to be somewhat brusque and abrupt in order to do so.  If you want a conversation to flow smoothly, then maybe you should avoid behaving in a manner which other people can easily interpret as deliberately and intentionally trying to be obnoxious.  +++$+++ I don't conceive that there's a personal quarrel between us, and I'm not approaching the discussions there from that angle.  Unfortunately, however, you for some reason chose to adopt a deliberately and intentionally provocative tone, and seem to feel rather free to dogmatically pontificate at length, even while having only a rather sketchy knowledge of the facts of the situation under discussion.  I'm not the only one who finds this rhetorical strategy on your part to be rather grating (cf. the "S-O-A-P-B-O-X" comment made before I ever replied to you at all), nor do I apologize for bringing your far-flung provocations into contact with basic reality, even if I have to be somewhat brusque and abrupt in order to do so.  If you want a conversation to flow smoothly, then maybe you should avoid behaving in a manner which other people can easily interpret as deliberately and intentionally trying to be obnoxious. [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 10:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
1403 +++$+++ AnonMoos +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1402 +++$+++ 1402 +++$+++ 2010-07-19 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.279565160E09 +++$+++ I didn't say that you insulted anybody -- I said that you (for some reason) chose to adopt a deliberately and intentionally provocative tone, and seemed to feel rather free to dogmatically pontificate at length (even while having only a rather sketchy knowledge of the facts of the situation under discussion), resulting in a overall rhetorical style which I was not the only one to find rather grating and annoying.  You had several opportunities to dial things down a notch, but chose not to take advantage of any of them, giving the end results which can now be seen in the Humanities ref. desk thread...  +++$+++ :I didn't say that you insulted anybody -- I said that you (for some reason) chose to adopt a deliberately and intentionally provocative tone, and seemed to feel rather free to dogmatically pontificate at length (even while having only a rather sketchy knowledge of the facts of the situation under discussion), resulting in a overall rhetorical style which I was not the only one to find rather grating and annoying.  You had several opportunities to dial things down a notch, but chose not to take advantage of any of them, giving the end results which can now be seen in the Humanities ref. desk thread... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 11:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

525691 +++$+++ Expediency101 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525691 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-19 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.213921080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Expediency101|Expediency101]] ([[User talk:Expediency101|talk]]) 17:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
525692 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525691 +++$+++ 525691 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.214021160E09 +++$+++ The process is manual. I think that reading [[Template:Infobox Disease]], [[Template talk:Infobox Disease]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)]] will give you most of the information you are looking for, but if you have further questions, I would be happy to do my best to answer. -- +++$+++ :The process is manual. I think that reading [[Template:Infobox Disease]], [[Template talk:Infobox Disease]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)]] will give you most of the information you are looking for, but if you have further questions, I would be happy to do my best to answer. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 21:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

1404 +++$+++ José Fontaine +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-01 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.280694720E09 +++$+++ This poster in the context of this page is representing or showing propagnda. But  he doesn't represent but propaganda but also '''reality'''. So it is neutral to write it with a verifiable source. You are placing many ''citation needed''  and when I give a citation, you would remove it.This placard is not only propaganda. I insistated in many paragraphs on the explanations of these atrocities. It is not anti-German. Sincrely  +++$+++ This poster in the context of this page is representing or showing propagnda. But  he doesn't represent but propaganda but also '''reality'''. So it is neutral to write it with a verifiable source. You are placing many ''citation needed''  and when I give a citation, you would remove it.This placard is not only propaganda. I insistated in many paragraphs on the explanations of these atrocities. It is not anti-German. Sincrely [[User:José Fontaine|José Fontaine]] ([[User talk:José Fontaine|talk]]) 13:32, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
1405 +++$+++ José Fontaine +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1404 +++$+++ 1404 +++$+++ 2010-08-02 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.280775000E09 +++$+++ I understand what you mean. But this placard, placed on this page is a [[Metaphor]] as also the [[Rape of Belgium]] itself incidentally. A metaphor, is not '' \xe0 la lettre'' true (There was not in the proper sense a rape of Belgium and Belgium is not a girl, but well in the figurative sense). There is also a ''rape''  of the International Right. So the placard is actual in a figurative sense. I agree with you to bring nuances to this way of speaking but it is historically right a rape happened. Because the German Chancelor recognized it (as far the inernational right is concerned), and for the massacres in Dinant for instance by the German Government in May 2002. In doing so, Germany show she is a great country. The German politics, since [[Willy Brandt]] (but before too), toward the Eastern countries, toward the jews, toward Belgium (etc.), is a great politics. The page ought to say it. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :I understand what you mean. But this placard, placed on this page is a [[Metaphor]] as also the [[Rape of Belgium]] itself incidentally. A metaphor, is not '' à la lettre'' true (There was not in the proper sense a rape of Belgium and Belgium is not a girl, but well in the figurative sense). There is also a ''rape''  of the International Right. So the placard is actual in a figurative sense. I agree with you to bring nuances to this way of speaking but it is historically right a rape happened. Because the German Chancelor recognized it (as far the inernational right is concerned), and for the massacres in Dinant for instance by the German Government in May 2002. In doing so, Germany show she is a great country. The German politics, since [[Willy Brandt]] (but before too), toward the Eastern countries, toward the jews, toward Belgium (etc.), is a great politics. The page ought to say it. Sincerely, [[User:José Fontaine|José Fontaine]] ([[User talk:José Fontaine|talk]]) 11:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

525693 +++$+++ CliffC +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525693 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-25 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.214443920E09 +++$+++ You recently edited [[Gait abnormality]], with summary \"split out types\".  Do you plan to revisit this article soon?  Much information and many references in the section \"Specific abnormalities and examples of causes\" and elsewhere have gone missing, with no way for the reader to know what the abnormal types are, and where their names and descriptions have been split off to.   -- +++$+++ You recently edited [[Gait abnormality]], with summary "split out types".  Do you plan to revisit this article soon?  Much information and many references in the section "Specific abnormalities and examples of causes" and elsewhere have gone missing, with no way for the reader to know what the abnormal types are, and where their names and descriptions have been split off to.   --[[User:CliffC|CliffC]] ([[User talk:CliffC|talk]]) 18:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
525694 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525693 +++$+++ 525693 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.214976120E09 +++$+++ The articles for the types have always been visible at the bottom of the page, but I've added a specific \"types\" section to make the articles harder to miss. -- +++$+++ :The articles for the types have always been visible at the bottom of the page, but I've added a specific "types" section to make the articles harder to miss. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 22:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

263550 +++$+++ Sbharris +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-30 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.149041040E09 +++$+++ Would you consider reblocking these guys, this time for a couple of weeks? They're back with vandalism a week after your last block. To do any good, I suggest that each block should be twice as long as the previous one, or twice as long as the period between the last two acts of vandalism. Perhaps whichever is shortest?  Longest?  +++$+++ Would you consider reblocking these guys, this time for a couple of weeks? They're back with vandalism a week after your last block. To do any good, I suggest that each block should be twice as long as the previous one, or twice as long as the period between the last two acts of vandalism. Perhaps whichever is shortest?  Longest? [[User:Sbharris|Sbharris]] 19:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
263551 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.149044820E09 +++$+++ Hi. I haven't blocked them today cause they were finished by the time I got your message. Next time you spot them, report them to [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism]] -- this will get the attention of admins who are online at that moment, and they'll be able to act quickly.  +++$+++ :Hi. I haven't blocked them today cause they were finished by the time I got your message. Next time you spot them, report them to [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism]] -- this will get the attention of admins who are online at that moment, and they'll be able to act quickly. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
263552 +++$+++ Sbharris +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 263551 +++$+++ 2006-06-01 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.149228480E09 +++$+++ Excuse a relatively newcomer to Wiki, but WHY is it important to block an IP while the vandal is still \"online\"??  Surely if you're going to block somebody for a week, it hardly matters whether they're knocked off for lunch or for bed or something. And many blocks do need to be longer than 24 hours. As you know, there are people who vandalize everyday for breakfast. They must do it in place of brushing their teeth or having coffee or something. Or maybe they do it in school during library hour. Blocking them for 24 hours 10 times in a row does no good at all. Why bother to do something which has no point, and just wastes your time?  +++$+++ ::Excuse a relatively newcomer to Wiki, but WHY is it important to block an IP while the vandal is still "online"??  Surely if you're going to block somebody for a week, it hardly matters whether they're knocked off for lunch or for bed or something. And many blocks do need to be longer than 24 hours. As you know, there are people who vandalize everyday for breakfast. They must do it in place of brushing their teeth or having coffee or something. Or maybe they do it in school during library hour. Blocking them for 24 hours 10 times in a row does no good at all. Why bother to do something which has no point, and just wastes your time? [[User:Sbharris|Sbharris]] 23:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
263553 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 263552 +++$+++ 2006-06-01 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.149228900E09 +++$+++ It's related to the Wikipedia philosophies -- open-source\/free access, etc. We have to be particularly careful with IPs because it could prevent genuine users from editing (which is against the philosophy). Some vandals indeed vandalise regularly; others don't. I very much understand your point and frustration, though. Banning users is a process taken seriously, though, and the reputations of admins are at stake if we go against [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism|the rules]] too often!. The talk page on that page contains similar discussions.  +++$+++ :::It's related to the Wikipedia philosophies -- open-source/free access, etc. We have to be particularly careful with IPs because it could prevent genuine users from editing (which is against the philosophy). Some vandals indeed vandalise regularly; others don't. I very much understand your point and frustration, though. Banning users is a process taken seriously, though, and the reputations of admins are at stake if we go against [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism|the rules]] too often!. The talk page on that page contains similar discussions. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
263554 +++$+++ Sbharris +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 263553 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.149322440E09 +++$+++ Saying it's \"against policy\" is saying nothing at all. You're basically saying that it's done that way because that's the way the owners of Wiki want it. Okay, fine. I guess it's their service. But don't expect me to agree if they don't have a good reason. And if they want my donations they had better do better. The idea that blocking an IP might prevent somebody innocent from editing is like saying that blocking a company from polluting a river is impossible\/unthinkable, because not everyone in the company might be culpable, and it would put the night janitor out of a job. Well, yes. But first, worry about the river. Stop the criminal from doing further crime, and worry about the effects of his arrest on his innocent family, second. Worry about stopping the deeds first. All civilized societies have eventually come to similar conclusions about communal misdeeds, and the communal effects of punishment. It will be interesting to see how long it takes Wiki to figure out that when Pearl Harbor is being bombed, diplomacy and nasty notes and small oil embargos are no longer good opinions. They never worked in the past. They won't work in the future.  +++$+++ ::::Saying it's "against policy" is saying nothing at all. You're basically saying that it's done that way because that's the way the owners of Wiki want it. Okay, fine. I guess it's their service. But don't expect me to agree if they don't have a good reason. And if they want my donations they had better do better. The idea that blocking an IP might prevent somebody innocent from editing is like saying that blocking a company from polluting a river is impossible/unthinkable, because not everyone in the company might be culpable, and it would put the night janitor out of a job. Well, yes. But first, worry about the river. Stop the criminal from doing further crime, and worry about the effects of his arrest on his innocent family, second. Worry about stopping the deeds first. All civilized societies have eventually come to similar conclusions about communal misdeeds, and the communal effects of punishment. It will be interesting to see how long it takes Wiki to figure out that when Pearl Harbor is being bombed, diplomacy and nasty notes and small oil embargos are no longer good opinions. They never worked in the past. They won't work in the future. [[User:Sbharris|Sbharris]] 01:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
263555 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 263553 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.149351180E09 +++$+++ No, I'm saying that Wikipedia has a philosophy, enforced by policy. Some people believe in the philosophy more strongly than others.  +++$+++ ::::No, I'm saying that Wikipedia has a philosophy, enforced by policy. Some people believe in the philosophy more strongly than others. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
263556 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 2006-06-01 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.149227640E09 +++$+++ Yes they were all 'fair' use. I checked. No it can't be considered vandalsim. [[WP:AGF|Assume good faith]]. Be careful before labelling people vandals.  +++$+++ :Yes they were all 'fair' use. I checked. No it can't be considered vandalsim. [[WP:AGF|Assume good faith]]. Be careful before labelling people vandals. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
263557 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 2006-06-01 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.149228360E09 +++$+++ That's fair enough... I'm more than happy to give you advice and help you correct your mistakes so long as you are willing to accept it. '''All''' of your images are fair use. They all have a fair use tag... the specific one about TV screenshots, rather than a generic 'fair use' tag.  +++$+++ :That's fair enough... I'm more than happy to give you advice and help you correct your mistakes so long as you are willing to accept it. '''All''' of your images are fair use. They all have a fair use tag... the specific one about TV screenshots, rather than a generic 'fair use' tag. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
263558 +++$+++ Feydey +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 2006-06-02 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.149311820E09 +++$+++ User's can choose where to leave their answers. If '''You''' had read the wikipedia guidelines none of this would have happened.   +++$+++ :User's can choose where to leave their answers. If '''You''' had read the wikipedia guidelines none of this would have happened.  [[User:Feydey|feydey]] 22:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
263559 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 263550 +++$+++ 2006-06-02 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.149311400E09 +++$+++ There is a lot of POV, and it has a low Google hit rate. The article is poorly written.  +++$+++ :There is a lot of POV, and it has a low Google hit rate. The article is poorly written. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

1407 +++$+++ Cynwolfe +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-05 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.280992680E09 +++$+++ I see you're trying to keep the Gibbon bit about Christianity in [[Roman Empire]]. Are you familiar enough with Gibbon to come up with a more precise citation? That would give you better grounds for keeping it. I support its inclusion, but don't have time to find a proper citation.  +++$+++ I see you're trying to keep the Gibbon bit about Christianity in [[Roman Empire]]. Are you familiar enough with Gibbon to come up with a more precise citation? That would give you better grounds for keeping it. I support its inclusion, but don't have time to find a proper citation. [[User:Cynwolfe|Cynwolfe]] ([[User talk:Cynwolfe|talk]]) 00:18, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
1408 +++$+++ Cynwolfe +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1407 +++$+++ 1407 +++$+++ 2010-08-05 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.281052080E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I think I clicked on the wrong talk link; yours was nearby.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I think I clicked on the wrong talk link; yours was nearby. [[User:Cynwolfe|Cynwolfe]] ([[User talk:Cynwolfe|talk]]) 16:48, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

525696 +++$+++ KC Panchal +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525696 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-27 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.214579160E09 +++$+++ <span style=\"font: small-caps 15px times;\">''' +++$+++ <span style="font: small-caps 15px times;">'''[[User:KC Panchal|<font color="#800080">—Ketan</font><font color="#000000">Panchal</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:KC Panchal|<font color="#2F4F4F">''<small>t</small>aL<font size=3>K</font>''</font>]]'''</sup></span> 08:06, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
525697 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525696 +++$+++ 525696 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.214976120E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much! -- +++$+++ :Thank you so much! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 22:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

1409 +++$+++ EraNavigator +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-10 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.281459540E09 +++$+++ I want to report User:Revilo11 for vandalism on the [[Roman army]] article, which I have now reversed. Since you know your way around Wiki much better than me, can I leave this matter in your capable hands? Regards  +++$+++ I want to report User:Revilo11 for vandalism on the [[Roman army]] article, which I have now reversed. Since you know your way around Wiki much better than me, can I leave this matter in your capable hands? Regards [[User:EraNavigator|EraNavigator]] ([[User talk:EraNavigator|talk]]) 09:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
1410 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1409 +++$+++ 1409 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.281507840E09 +++$+++ Leave him, hopefully he will not return. If he returns then we can report him.  +++$+++ :Leave him, hopefully he will not return. If he returns then we can report him. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 23:24, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

1411 +++$+++ EraNavigator +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-10 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.281460020E09 +++$+++ PS: Could you add your opinion to the debate on dating-conventions in the Discussion Page of [[Imperial Roman army]]? User:Awien has taken it upon himself to change the BC\/AD convention that I used to BCE\/CE. I am keen to get as many opinions as possible on this. Regards  +++$+++ PS: Could you add your opinion to the debate on dating-conventions in the Discussion Page of [[Imperial Roman army]]? User:Awien has taken it upon himself to change the BC/AD convention that I used to BCE/CE. I am keen to get as many opinions as possible on this. Regards [[User:EraNavigator|EraNavigator]] ([[User talk:EraNavigator|talk]]) 10:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
1412 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1411 +++$+++ 1411 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.281507840E09 +++$+++ I hope you knew what my opinion about the BCE\/CE crap was. Awien acted unilaterally against the rules and despite having no consensus~for the change. The ball is in his field now.  +++$+++ :I hope you knew what my opinion about the BCE/CE crap was. Awien acted unilaterally against the rules and despite having no consensus~for the change. The ball is in his field now. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 23:24, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
1413 +++$+++ EraNavigator +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1411 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-11 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.281580140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your decisive intervention. I hope Awien now disappears and stops hassling everyone with this politically correct nonsense. How do you rate my [[Roman army]] project so far? Have you also read [[Early Roman army]] and [[Roman army of the mid-Republic]]? Regards  +++$+++ :::Thanks for your decisive intervention. I hope Awien now disappears and stops hassling everyone with this politically correct nonsense. How do you rate my [[Roman army]] project so far? Have you also read [[Early Roman army]] and [[Roman army of the mid-Republic]]? Regards [[User:EraNavigator|EraNavigator]] ([[User talk:EraNavigator|talk]]) 19:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
1414 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1411 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-12 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.281628380E09 +++$+++ My intervention was nothing special and the issue might yet be revived by Awien. I have a taken a look in some of these articles and I'm very impressed. My only advice is that you provide more precise citations from your books. Presently you have whole paragraphs without a citation; the ideal is to provide a citation for every fifth or sixth sentence (the most important ones).  +++$+++ ::::My intervention was nothing special and the issue might yet be revived by Awien. I have a taken a look in some of these articles and I'm very impressed. My only advice is that you provide more precise citations from your books. Presently you have whole paragraphs without a citation; the ideal is to provide a citation for every fifth or sixth sentence (the most important ones). [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 08:53, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
1415 +++$+++ EraNavigator +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1411 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-12 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.281649440E09 +++$+++ You are certainly right about [[Roman army of the mid-Republic]]. I reckon it needs some 50 extra refs to bring it up to scratch. Unfortunately, I am not very disciplined about entering refs - I tend to write first, find refs later - not a good procedure! PS: there are several of my articles which are currently un-graded, including [[Roman army]], [[Early Roman army]], [[Roman army of the mid-Republic]], [[Imperial Roman army]], [[Alpine regiments of the Roman army]], [[Raeti]], [[Costoboci]], [[Equites cataphractarii]], [[Equites singulares Augusti]]. The big ones I will eventually submit for A-grade. In the meantime, could you award B-grade to these (if they deserve it, of course), as grading seems to have some deterrent effect on vandals\/casual editing. regards  +++$+++ :::::You are certainly right about [[Roman army of the mid-Republic]]. I reckon it needs some 50 extra refs to bring it up to scratch. Unfortunately, I am not very disciplined about entering refs - I tend to write first, find refs later - not a good procedure! PS: there are several of my articles which are currently un-graded, including [[Roman army]], [[Early Roman army]], [[Roman army of the mid-Republic]], [[Imperial Roman army]], [[Alpine regiments of the Roman army]], [[Raeti]], [[Costoboci]], [[Equites cataphractarii]], [[Equites singulares Augusti]]. The big ones I will eventually submit for A-grade. In the meantime, could you award B-grade to these (if they deserve it, of course), as grading seems to have some deterrent effect on vandals/casual editing. regards [[User:EraNavigator|EraNavigator]] ([[User talk:EraNavigator|talk]]) 14:44, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

525701 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-21 10:25:00 +++$+++ 1.216661100E09 +++$+++ Well done for uploading those Orphanet journal images. I have, however, temporarily removed some galleries from articles like [[thymoma]] and [[rheumatoid arthritis]]. In my mind, these galleries are unhelpful unless every image has a caption describing the image. Let me know what you think.  +++$+++ Well done for uploading those Orphanet journal images. I have, however, temporarily removed some galleries from articles like [[thymoma]] and [[rheumatoid arthritis]]. In my mind, these galleries are unhelpful unless every image has a caption describing the image. Let me know what you think. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 10:25, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
525702 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525701 +++$+++ 525701 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.216757700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for fixing [[thymoma]]. Could I also ask you to provide documentation for {{tl|Dorlands}}? I'd love to use it to source ''Simmonds' disease'' in [[hypopituitarism]] but I'm not quite sure how to work the template.  +++$+++ :Thanks for fixing [[thymoma]]. Could I also ask you to provide documentation for {{tl|Dorlands}}? I'd love to use it to source ''Simmonds' disease'' in [[hypopituitarism]] but I'm not quite sure how to work the template. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 13:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
525703 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525701 +++$+++ 525702 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.216773420E09 +++$+++ See [[Template:DorlandsDict]]. -- +++$+++ ::See [[Template:DorlandsDict]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 17:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

611905 +++$+++ Morenooso +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611905 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-01 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.175411760E09 +++$+++ BTW, I am a recent changes patrol editor. I was trying to leave the clue that his article will see lots of April Fool's hits.  +++$+++ BTW, I am a recent changes patrol editor. I was trying to leave the clue that his article will see lots of April Fool's hits. [[User:Morenooso|Morenooso]] 00:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
611906 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611905 +++$+++ 611905 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.175411880E09 +++$+++ Oh. It still seemed like nonsense to me. \/\/  +++$+++ :Oh. It still seemed like nonsense to me. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 00:18, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
611907 +++$+++ Morenooso +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611905 +++$+++ 611906 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.175413200E09 +++$+++ As of 0000Z, which was 40 minutes ago, [[April Fool]] will see Wikipedia take many hits.  +++$+++ ::As of 0000Z, which was 40 minutes ago, [[April Fool]] will see Wikipedia take many hits. [[User:Morenooso|Morenooso]] 00:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
611908 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611905 +++$+++ 611905 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.175467680E09 +++$+++ My brother says the same exact thing about other editors getting to an article before he does. Well what I do is find look for something that I like. For example, I love anime and manga so I have a lot of articles on my watch list about anime and manga. Find a ''lot'' of articles you like. When you do that, you can wait for someone to vandalize it or find a sentence\/paragraph\/etc. that needs rephrasing. The amount of things you can do is endless, and it's pretty much what I do when looking for something to edit. Another thing you could to is join the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject League of Copyeditors|League of Copyeditors]] and copyedit (that means correcting punctuation and spelling, grammer, tone, etc.) some articles in need (a list of articles in need of copyediting can be found [[:Category:All articles needing copy edit|here]]). Of course you can do all the work of a League of Copyeditors member without actually joining, but it would be great to have another official member around. If these things don't help, just let me know and I'll think of something else. Happy editing! \/\/  +++$+++ :My brother says the same exact thing about other editors getting to an article before he does. Well what I do is find look for something that I like. For example, I love anime and manga so I have a lot of articles on my watch list about anime and manga. Find a ''lot'' of articles you like. When you do that, you can wait for someone to vandalize it or find a sentence/paragraph/etc. that needs rephrasing. The amount of things you can do is endless, and it's pretty much what I do when looking for something to edit. Another thing you could to is join the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject League of Copyeditors|League of Copyeditors]] and copyedit (that means correcting punctuation and spelling, grammer, tone, etc.) some articles in need (a list of articles in need of copyediting can be found [[:Category:All articles needing copy edit|here]]). Of course you can do all the work of a League of Copyeditors member without actually joining, but it would be great to have another official member around. If these things don't help, just let me know and I'll think of something else. Happy editing! // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 15:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
611909 +++$+++ Tohru Honda13 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611905 +++$+++ 611908 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.175469420E09 +++$+++ ''S\xed'', the League of Copyeditors is great. With about 1,600 articles in need of copyedit, you're sure to find some articles that haven't been touched in a looong time. That could give you an oppurtunity to edit it without getting into too many edit conflicts. Nice advice there, Poetic Decay! And uh, the League is always open for new members. ''' +++$+++ ::''Sí'', the League of Copyeditors is great. With about 1,600 articles in need of copyedit, you're sure to find some articles that haven't been touched in a looong time. That could give you an oppurtunity to edit it without getting into too many edit conflicts. Nice advice there, Poetic Decay! And uh, the League is always open for new members. '''[[User:Tohru Honda13|Tohru Honda13]]''' 16:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

263560 +++$+++ FFGaming +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-02 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.149311820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:FFGaming|FFGaming]] 22:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
263561 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263560 +++$+++ 263560 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.149378840E09 +++$+++ I don't want POV and articles about non-notable 'magazines' here. Don't play the 'discrimination' wild card - it's cheap.  +++$+++ :I don't want POV and articles about non-notable 'magazines' here. Don't play the 'discrimination' wild card - it's cheap. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

1417 +++$+++  +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-10 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.284120000E09 +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of [[Special:Contributions\/Flamarande|your recent edits]], such as the one you made to [[:Sh\u014djo manga]], did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee\/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> \xb7\xb7\xb7 +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of [[Special:Contributions/Flamarande|your recent edits]], such as the one you made to [[:Shōjo manga]], did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]]<sup>[[Help:Installing Japanese character sets|?]]</sup> · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<font color="maroon">Join WikiProject Japan</font>]]!</small> 05:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
1418 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1417 +++$+++ 1417 +++$+++ 2010-09-10 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.284163800E09 +++$+++ From time to time I use a computer with a small screen. The former placing of the two images (in a separate section below the manga box) created a large empty space. By placing the two images above (directly below the manga box) this 'empty space' is corrected (without any problems that I know of to users with large screens). Thank you.  +++$+++ :From time to time I use a computer with a small screen. The former placing of the two images (in a separate section below the manga box) created a large empty space. By placing the two images above (directly below the manga box) this 'empty space' is corrected (without any problems that I know of to users with large screens). Thank you. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 17:10, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

263562 +++$+++ Robeykr +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263562 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-04 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.149405900E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ -- [[User:Robeykr|Jason Palpatine]] 00:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
263563 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263562 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-04 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.149468780E09 +++$+++ There is a disuccion going on over at the Film WikiProject about the length of plots. We're trying to keep them down. If this survives AfD, then I forsee many more similar arguments.  +++$+++ ::There is a disuccion going on over at the Film WikiProject about the length of plots. We're trying to keep them down. If this survives AfD, then I forsee many more similar arguments. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:53, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

263564 +++$+++ Redhandedsamm +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-10 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.152531840E09 +++$+++ Why was my article on the Elm Shakespeare Company deleted? I can't find a reason.  +++$+++ Why was my article on the Elm Shakespeare Company deleted? I can't find a reason. [[User:Redhandedsamm|Redhandedsamm]] 04:44, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
263565 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263564 +++$+++ 263564 +++$+++ 2006-06-07 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.149704040E09 +++$+++ Have you asked [[User:Keenan Pepper]], the person who deleted it? It was an uncontested PROD. Someone (else) thought the film was non-notable. No-one disagreed. Another admin (Keenan) obviously agreed and deleted it per policy. And please sign your posts.  +++$+++ :Have you asked [[User:Keenan Pepper]], the person who deleted it? It was an uncontested PROD. Someone (else) thought the film was non-notable. No-one disagreed. Another admin (Keenan) obviously agreed and deleted it per policy. And please sign your posts. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
263566 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263564 +++$+++ 263564 +++$+++ 2006-06-07 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.149747000E09 +++$+++ Let me know when's convenient and I'll put the kettle on. Tea or coffee?  +++$+++ :Let me know when's convenient and I'll put the kettle on. Tea or coffee? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

1421 +++$+++ MyMoloboaccount +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-27 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.285572000E09 +++$+++ Please wait while I finish updating the article. While it is no rule, the courtesy would require that I would be allowed to finish my edits. Also I see no reason for such clutter of barely reckognisable images that make reading of the text difficult-especially if we have better versions, quite visible.-- +++$+++ Please wait while I finish updating the article. While it is no rule, the courtesy would require that I would be allowed to finish my edits. Also I see no reason for such clutter of barely reckognisable images that make reading of the text difficult-especially if we have better versions, quite visible.--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 00:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
1422 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1421 +++$+++ 1421 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.285572660E09 +++$+++ I was under the impression that you were finished for today. The pictures are not cluttered if they are all on the same side and have the same size. Notice also that the article is not only about the genocide it is de facto about the whole war, campaign, and background. Therefore the other pictures are valuable because they provide details of the conflict's background.  +++$+++ :I was under the impression that you were finished for today. The pictures are not cluttered if they are all on the same side and have the same size. Notice also that the article is not only about the genocide it is de facto about the whole war, campaign, and background. Therefore the other pictures are valuable because they provide details of the conflict's background. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 00:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

1423 +++$+++ MyMoloboaccount +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1423 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-27 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.285572720E09 +++$+++ Why do we need two pictures of von Trotha? Especially if the other one is barely visible? -- +++$+++ Why do we need two pictures of von Trotha? Especially if the other one is barely visible? --[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 00:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
1424 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1423 +++$+++ 1423 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.285573380E09 +++$+++ In my screen (1440 X 900 px) the article is '''lacking''' in pictures to accompany the text. What we could do is move the first picture (of the starving survivors) below (into the 'Number of victims'-section) and move the larger Trotha-picture to its place. The larger picture (of the main responsible) can then be at the side of the \"content's box\" without problem (something which the present picture can't do - it's simply too small).  +++$+++ :In my screen (1440 X 900 px) the article is '''lacking''' in pictures to accompany the text. What we could do is move the first picture (of the starving survivors) below (into the 'Number of victims'-section) and move the larger Trotha-picture to its place. The larger picture (of the main responsible) can then be at the side of the "content's box" without problem (something which the present picture can't do - it's simply too small). [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 00:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
1425 +++$+++ MyMoloboaccount +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1423 +++$+++ 1424 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.285573500E09 +++$+++ Disagree-the picture of victims of the genocide needs to be first. I see no reason for two pictures of von Trotha, especially as the second one barely shows him. The same with other duplicates-- +++$+++ ::Disagree-the picture of victims of the genocide needs to be first. I see no reason for two pictures of von Trotha, especially as the second one barely shows him. The same with other duplicates--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 00:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
1426 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1423 +++$+++ 1425 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.285573860E09 +++$+++ As I said \"in my screen the article lacks pictures\". If you really want to remove the smaller Trotha-picture, fine by me. But the \"Theodor Leutwein with Hendrik Witbooi (2nd on the left?) in 1896\"-picture is relevant for the whole conflict and has to stay.  +++$+++ :::As I said "in my screen the article lacks pictures". If you really want to remove the smaller Trotha-picture, fine by me. But the "Theodor Leutwein with Hendrik Witbooi (2nd on the left?) in 1896"-picture is relevant for the whole conflict and has to stay. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 00:51, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
1427 +++$+++ MyMoloboaccount +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1423 +++$+++ 1426 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.285573980E09 +++$+++ Both Leutwin and Witbooi have their own clear pictures, we don't need one where it even isn't clear who is who on the picture.-- +++$+++ ::::Both Leutwin and Witbooi have their own clear pictures, we don't need one where it even isn't clear who is who on the picture.--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 00:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
1428 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1423 +++$+++ 1427 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.285574340E09 +++$+++ But the fact that there was civil encounter\/relation between the two (shown by the picture) before the conflict is quite important. This article is not only about the genocide, it also about the background of the rebellion, the rebellion itself, and the aftermath. This picture has to stay.  +++$+++ :::::But the fact that there was civil encounter/relation between the two (shown by the picture) before the conflict is quite important. This article is not only about the genocide, it also about the background of the rebellion, the rebellion itself, and the aftermath. This picture has to stay. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 00:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

263569 +++$+++ Jason Palpatine +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263569 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-09 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.149852600E09 +++$+++ You didn't answer me the first time.  I guess you tookm the question to be rehtoricle -- sorry, but it's not, I'm serious.  What does \"spurns a series of similar articles\" mean? --  +++$+++ You didn't answer me the first time.  I guess you tookm the question to be rehtoricle -- sorry, but it's not, I'm serious.  What does "spurns a series of similar articles" mean? -- [[User:Jason Palpatine|Jason Palpatine]] 04:30, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
263570 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263569 +++$+++ 263569 +++$+++ 2006-06-09 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.149870900E09 +++$+++ I answered the question, but you mustn't have got the chance to read it before I archived my page. See [[User_talk:The_JPS\/archive3#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2F2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_.28film_synopsis.29]].  +++$+++ :I answered the question, but you mustn't have got the chance to read it before I archived my page. See [[User_talk:The_JPS/archive3#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2F2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_.28film_synopsis.29]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

525714 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-29 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.217391720E09 +++$+++ I was also hoping we could standardize the drug navboxes to use {{tl|\xb7}} instead of hyphens as separators. Several navboxes already use interpuncts, and using hyphens as list separators goes against the Manual of Style. How do you feel about it? Best,  +++$+++ I was also hoping we could standardize the drug navboxes to use {{tl|·}} instead of hyphens as separators. Several navboxes already use interpuncts, and using hyphens as list separators goes against the Manual of Style. How do you feel about it? Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 21:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
525715 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525714 +++$+++ 525714 +++$+++ 2008-07-30 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.217417340E09 +++$+++ For the first issue -- I don't recommend that, but I won't object or revert if you redirect. For the second -- propose it at MEDMOS, and I'll support it. (We had an old pharma navbox style guide a couple of years ago, but it doesn't really work with [[Template:Navbox]], and it would be good to have something to point to.) -- +++$+++ :For the first issue -- I don't recommend that, but I won't object or revert if you redirect. For the second -- propose it at MEDMOS, and I'll support it. (We had an old pharma navbox style guide a couple of years ago, but it doesn't really work with [[Template:Navbox]], and it would be good to have something to point to.) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 04:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
525716 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525714 +++$+++ 525715 +++$+++ 2008-07-30 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.217461260E09 +++$+++ Hmm, I'd like to hear more on why you don't recommend the merge\u2014I didn't think we had any separate articles on depot formulations of drugs? I'll bring up the {{tl|\xb7}} versus hyphens issue at MEDMOS Talk. Best,  +++$+++ ::Hmm, I'd like to hear more on why you don't recommend the merge—I didn't think we had any separate articles on depot formulations of drugs? I'll bring up the {{tl|·}} versus hyphens issue at MEDMOS Talk. Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 16:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

263571 +++$+++ Mackensen +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-10 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.149980880E09 +++$+++ I have reblocked. The evidence is conclusive. In the future, please discuss the block ''before'' unblocking a perm-banned user. Thanks,  +++$+++ I have reblocked. The evidence is conclusive. In the future, please discuss the block ''before'' unblocking a perm-banned user. Thanks, [[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]] 16:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
263572 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263571 +++$+++ 263571 +++$+++ 2006-06-10 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.149981720E09 +++$+++ Where is the evidence that this user has done anything wrong? Where is the discussion to block a perfectly good user? I appreciate that the alleged sock's history was not good, but if they are using thi sfor genuine edits, then all is well.  +++$+++ :Where is the evidence that this user has done anything wrong? Where is the discussion to block a perfectly good user? I appreciate that the alleged sock's history was not good, but if they are using thi sfor genuine edits, then all is well. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

263573 +++$+++ Stephenb +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-13 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.150244820E09 +++$+++ Hi - can you point me at somewhere that says why this user was blocked?  I ask because another user has joined the [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject EastEnders|EastEnders project]] called [[User:AnemoneProjectors|AnemoneProjectors]].  He only started contributing after the above user was banned, is suspiciously good at editing (suggesting he's edited before) and contributes to a similar set of articles (not '''just''' on ''[[EastEnders]]'').  I don't know whether he is another sockpuppet of this \"JamieAdams\" user, but I'd like to investigate (or someone else should)...  +++$+++ Hi - can you point me at somewhere that says why this user was blocked?  I ask because another user has joined the [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject EastEnders|EastEnders project]] called [[User:AnemoneProjectors|AnemoneProjectors]].  He only started contributing after the above user was banned, is suspiciously good at editing (suggesting he's edited before) and contributes to a similar set of articles (not '''just''' on ''[[EastEnders]]'').  I don't know whether he is another sockpuppet of this "JamieAdams" user, but I'd like to investigate (or someone else should)... [[User:Stephenb|Stephenb]] [[User talk:Stephenb|(Talk)]] 17:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
263574 +++$+++ Stephenb +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263573 +++$+++ 263573 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.150245300E09 +++$+++ NB: I've asked [[:User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] about this after tracking him down via your contributions list. It's probably nothing, but, well...  +++$+++ :NB: I've asked [[:User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] about this after tracking him down via your contributions list. It's probably nothing, but, well... [[User:Stephenb|Stephenb]] [[User talk:Stephenb|(Talk)]] 17:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
263575 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263573 +++$+++ 263573 +++$+++ 2006-06-10 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.149990480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your message. I was concerned about rhetoric such as \"evil\". There are a couple of labels in your above post (\"dangerous and damaging\") that should not be used on Wikipedia. My understanding is that the user was blocked for legal reasons. Continuing hyperbole seems hypercritical. No, I do not have any persoanl feelings. He was one of 92 others who supported my RfA.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your message. I was concerned about rhetoric such as "evil". There are a couple of labels in your above post ("dangerous and damaging") that should not be used on Wikipedia. My understanding is that the user was blocked for legal reasons. Continuing hyperbole seems hypercritical. No, I do not have any persoanl feelings. He was one of 92 others who supported my RfA. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

1431 +++$+++ 86.164.144.120 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-11 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.289504340E09 +++$+++ Hey. Maybe our definitions of 'rude' differ, but I consider it rude to tell someone \"you could have found it yourself in 5 minutes\" when doing something they asked. Whether or not you intended to be rude, it reads as rude: I cannot see your expression or hear the tone of your voice. If you had said \"I found this by (insert route to articles), which you could do in future\", that wouldn't be rude and would be helpful. If they had actually been able to find those articles themselves without prompting, they would have done so. Even then, we've surely all had those blank moments when we can't find something that seems obvious once we've asked, or once someone else points it out. But this sort of question (essentially \"I can't find\/understand this information in the articles I've found, and I can't find the article that should contain this\") is why the desks were created. If you don't like answering this sort of question, if answering it makes you resent the asker or consider them lazy, then do not answer this sort of quesion. Please don't start making comments about how they shouldn't have asked. [[Special:Contributions\/86.164.144.120|86.164.144.120]] ( +++$+++ Hey. Maybe our definitions of 'rude' differ, but I consider it rude to tell someone "you could have found it yourself in 5 minutes" when doing something they asked. Whether or not you intended to be rude, it reads as rude: I cannot see your expression or hear the tone of your voice. If you had said "I found this by (insert route to articles), which you could do in future", that wouldn't be rude and would be helpful. If they had actually been able to find those articles themselves without prompting, they would have done so. Even then, we've surely all had those blank moments when we can't find something that seems obvious once we've asked, or once someone else points it out. But this sort of question (essentially "I can't find/understand this information in the articles I've found, and I can't find the article that should contain this") is why the desks were created. If you don't like answering this sort of question, if answering it makes you resent the asker or consider them lazy, then do not answer this sort of quesion. Please don't start making comments about how they shouldn't have asked. [[Special:Contributions/86.164.144.120|86.164.144.120]] ([[User talk:86.164.144.120|talk]]) 11:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
1432 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-11 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.289513640E09 +++$+++ If you are unable to see my expression or hear the tone of my voice then perhaps you should assume good faith of my part. \"It reads as rude\"  only reveals your own personal interpretation and suspicions. \"If they had actually been able to find those articles themselves without prompting, they would have done so.\"  is a joke, right? It has to be a joke. I did not make a comment about how he shouldn't have asked. I '''just''' pointed out that the answer was extremely easy to find: \"Let me point out that you could have found the answers for yourself in 5 minutes\".  +++$+++ ::If you are unable to see my expression or hear the tone of my voice then perhaps you should assume good faith of my part. "It reads as rude"  only reveals your own personal interpretation and suspicions. "If they had actually been able to find those articles themselves without prompting, they would have done so."  is a joke, right? It has to be a joke. I did not make a comment about how he shouldn't have asked. I '''just''' pointed out that the answer was extremely easy to find: "Let me point out that you could have found the answers for yourself in 5 minutes". [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 14:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
1433 +++$+++ 80.58.205.34 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1431 +++$+++ 1431 +++$+++ 2010-11-11 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.289508600E09 +++$+++ I came here for the same reason, to inform you of different definition of rudeness. However, I prefer to clutter the desk instead of letting here my POV. See: [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Reference_desk\/Humanities#Prez.2FPM]].[[Special:Contributions\/80.58.205.34|80.58.205.34]] ( +++$+++ :I came here for the same reason, to inform you of different definition of rudeness. However, I prefer to clutter the desk instead of letting here my POV. See: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities#Prez.2FPM]].[[Special:Contributions/80.58.205.34|80.58.205.34]] ([[User talk:80.58.205.34|talk]]) 12:50, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
1434 +++$+++ 86.164.144.120 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-11 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.289515680E09 +++$+++ Please don't start on the 'white knighting' business: we are a community, with basic community standards of behaviour, and it is the business of all of us to point out when something is unhelpful or rude. That is how a community works. Since you were apparently unaware that what you said was rude (and unhelpful, since it doesn't tell them ''how'' they could have found it), my informing you has increased your knowledge. It would be a shame if nobody told you, and you were unintentionally insulting people for years who all assumed you meant it (since it would be obvious to them that it was rude). Any insults you deliver should be intentional, for effective communication :) [[Special:Contributions\/86.164.144.120|86.164.144.120]] ( +++$+++ :::Please don't start on the 'white knighting' business: we are a community, with basic community standards of behaviour, and it is the business of all of us to point out when something is unhelpful or rude. That is how a community works. Since you were apparently unaware that what you said was rude (and unhelpful, since it doesn't tell them ''how'' they could have found it), my informing you has increased your knowledge. It would be a shame if nobody told you, and you were unintentionally insulting people for years who all assumed you meant it (since it would be obvious to them that it was rude). Any insults you deliver should be intentional, for effective communication :) [[Special:Contributions/86.164.144.120|86.164.144.120]] ([[User talk:86.164.144.120|talk]]) 14:48, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
1435 +++$+++ Marco polo +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-11 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.289528880E09 +++$+++ I agree that Flamarande's wording reads as rude and\/or arrogant to people in English-speaking countries.  (Having lived in Germany, I can also vouch that many behaviors that would be considered rude in English-speaking countries are normal in Germany.)  Apart from variable cultural definitions of rudeness, I would point out that Flamarande '''cannot know''' that the person who posted the question could have found the information in 5 minutes.  We have no idea how much or how little skill this person has at searching for information.  Those of us who answer on the Reference Desk are very skilled at finding information.  Hopefully, we are happy to help others who are less skilled and feel no need to scold them for lacking that skill.  I think that we have to assume that if the person asks for the information, he or she does not know how to find it.  We should feel free to say, \"You can find this kind of information by typing your topic into the Search box\" without scolding the person for not doing so.  In the case of this person's question, it would not have been easy to find the information just by typing key words from their question into the Search box.  Really, it would be necessary to know the labels for the different structures of government\u2014a level of knowledge that we have no right to expect from the questioner.   +++$+++ ::::I agree that Flamarande's wording reads as rude and/or arrogant to people in English-speaking countries.  (Having lived in Germany, I can also vouch that many behaviors that would be considered rude in English-speaking countries are normal in Germany.)  Apart from variable cultural definitions of rudeness, I would point out that Flamarande '''cannot know''' that the person who posted the question could have found the information in 5 minutes.  We have no idea how much or how little skill this person has at searching for information.  Those of us who answer on the Reference Desk are very skilled at finding information.  Hopefully, we are happy to help others who are less skilled and feel no need to scold them for lacking that skill.  I think that we have to assume that if the person asks for the information, he or she does not know how to find it.  We should feel free to say, "You can find this kind of information by typing your topic into the Search box" without scolding the person for not doing so.  In the case of this person's question, it would not have been easy to find the information just by typing key words from their question into the Search box.  Really, it would be necessary to know the labels for the different structures of government—a level of knowledge that we have no right to expect from the questioner.  [[User:Marco polo|Marco polo]] ([[User talk:Marco polo|talk]]) 18:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
1436 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-11 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.289534700E09 +++$+++ I believe that I can know if someone can find the relevant information about Presidential systems in 5 minutes or less. If you looking for information about Presidential systems you logically type [[:President]] in the search-field, hit enter, and voila. The article will give you the wanted information. Less than 5 minutes. It takes more effort and requires some knowledge about the inner workings of Wikipedia to find the relevant Humanities page. At least that's my honest opinion in this matter.  +++$+++ :::::I believe that I can know if someone can find the relevant information about Presidential systems in 5 minutes or less. If you looking for information about Presidential systems you logically type [[:President]] in the search-field, hit enter, and voila. The article will give you the wanted information. Less than 5 minutes. It takes more effort and requires some knowledge about the inner workings of Wikipedia to find the relevant Humanities page. At least that's my honest opinion in this matter. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 20:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
1437 +++$+++ 86.164.144.120 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1431 +++$+++ 1431 +++$+++ 2010-11-13 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.289710980E09 +++$+++ I note there is a related discussion of sorts [[Wikipedia_talk:Reference_desk#Rude_.28.3F.29_answer|on the Reference Desk Talk Page]], and nobody involved has thought to notify you: I will be reminding those involved that they should have told you, since community standards of behaviour cut both ways. You could, of course, have found it yourself in less than 5 minutes, if you had known to look :P <small>The last sentence was a joke, and not intended as a genuine remonstration.<\/small> [[Special:Contributions\/86.164.144.120|86.164.144.120]] ( +++$+++ :I note there is a related discussion of sorts [[Wikipedia_talk:Reference_desk#Rude_.28.3F.29_answer|on the Reference Desk Talk Page]], and nobody involved has thought to notify you: I will be reminding those involved that they should have told you, since community standards of behaviour cut both ways. You could, of course, have found it yourself in less than 5 minutes, if you had known to look :P <small>The last sentence was a joke, and not intended as a genuine remonstration.</small> [[Special:Contributions/86.164.144.120|86.164.144.120]] ([[User talk:86.164.144.120|talk]]) 21:03, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

525720 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-30 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.217448120E09 +++$+++ Hey, you recently uploaded some great images from a Creative Commons-licensed journal (was it ''Orphanet J Rare Dis''?) I was wondering if you were aware of an MRI scan of the pituitary from the same source, which I would like to include in [[hypopituitarism]]. It doesn't greatly matter if the scan shows pathology or not.  +++$+++ Hey, you recently uploaded some great images from a Creative Commons-licensed journal (was it ''Orphanet J Rare Dis''?) I was wondering if you were aware of an MRI scan of the pituitary from the same source, which I would like to include in [[hypopituitarism]]. It doesn't greatly matter if the scan shows pathology or not. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 13:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
525721 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525720 +++$+++ 525720 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.217497500E09 +++$+++ The closest I could find was http:\/\/www.ojrd.com\/content\/3\/1\/17 (images 7 and 8), but it's not a perfect match. -- +++$+++ :The closest I could find was http://www.ojrd.com/content/3/1/17 (images 7 and 8), but it's not a perfect match. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 02:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

263577 +++$+++ Learninglogs +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-14 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.150338120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Learninglogs|Learninglogs]] 19:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
263578 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263577 +++$+++ 263577 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.150421520E09 +++$+++ Other users' violations is not an excuse to commit violations yourself. As I have said before, please bring specific images to me if you think they need correcting.<br>I have not \"hounded\" of \"picked on\" you. It has been a couple of weeks since I warned you about these. I certainly don't want you to stop editing. I just want you to adhere to our policies.<br>The details should be on the image description page. That is your responsibility, as uploader.  +++$+++ :Other users' violations is not an excuse to commit violations yourself. As I have said before, please bring specific images to me if you think they need correcting.<br>I have not "hounded" of "picked on" you. It has been a couple of weeks since I warned you about these. I certainly don't want you to stop editing. I just want you to adhere to our policies.<br>The details should be on the image description page. That is your responsibility, as uploader. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
263579 +++$+++ Gungadin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263577 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.150427160E09 +++$+++ How childish! Instead of trying to be malicious to other users Shakirfan, why dont you do something constructive i.e. ask JPS what you are doing wrong and how to go about making your images acceptable for Wikipedia. I have been warned sevral times in the past for uploading unsuitable images, so I resent this accusation of favouritism. since this time I have only uplaoded screenshots, which have all ben tagged corectly because I sought help from JPS on how to do this. I suggest you do the same. By the way, if you do see any images that I uplaod which have infringed copyright, then please let me know and I will remove them. We are all just trying to improve Wikipedia and im sure that no one puposefully intends to infringe copyright and I certainly dont.  +++$+++ :::How childish! Instead of trying to be malicious to other users Shakirfan, why dont you do something constructive i.e. ask JPS what you are doing wrong and how to go about making your images acceptable for Wikipedia. I have been warned sevral times in the past for uploading unsuitable images, so I resent this accusation of favouritism. since this time I have only uplaoded screenshots, which have all ben tagged corectly because I sought help from JPS on how to do this. I suggest you do the same. By the way, if you do see any images that I uplaod which have infringed copyright, then please let me know and I will remove them. We are all just trying to improve Wikipedia and im sure that no one puposefully intends to infringe copyright and I certainly dont. [[User:Gungadin|Gungadin]] 20:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

263580 +++$+++ Shakirfan +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263580 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-16 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.150508520E09 +++$+++ I have been stressed lately cos of domestic problems and yesterday I had a minor breakdown and just used the internet particularly this site as a distraction. But after some good sleep, I felt a lot better. Sorry to Gungadin and The JPS for what I said. Internet has been a kind of distraction for me lately to forget my problems so I just lashed out my anger at you people. Very sorry.  +++$+++ I have been stressed lately cos of domestic problems and yesterday I had a minor breakdown and just used the internet particularly this site as a distraction. But after some good sleep, I felt a lot better. Sorry to Gungadin and The JPS for what I said. Internet has been a kind of distraction for me lately to forget my problems so I just lashed out my anger at you people. Very sorry. [[User:Shakirfan|Shakirfan]] 18:42, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
263581 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263580 +++$+++ 263580 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.151733660E09 +++$+++ That's OK, Shakirfan. I know how you feel!  +++$+++ :That's OK, Shakirfan. I know how you feel! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

525725 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525725 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-02 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.186103820E09 +++$+++ Do you think we should wikilink the years to the specific championships? For example, on [[Template:U.S. Open champions]], there are currently 4 wikilinked years (because 4 tournament pages have been created so far), but it gets tougher to distinguish between the years and the players if everything is blue. I think something about the formatting has to change on all 4 templates.  +++$+++ Do you think we should wikilink the years to the specific championships? For example, on [[Template:U.S. Open champions]], there are currently 4 wikilinked years (because 4 tournament pages have been created so far), but it gets tougher to distinguish between the years and the players if everything is blue. I think something about the formatting has to change on all 4 templates. [[User:Supertigerman|Supertigerman]] 18:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
525726 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525725 +++$+++ 525725 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.186104120E09 +++$+++ I just noticed that the tennis champions templates do not wikilink the years for the championships. Perhaps we should not either.  +++$+++ :I just noticed that the tennis champions templates do not wikilink the years for the championships. Perhaps we should not either. [[User:Supertigerman|Supertigerman]] 18:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

1438 +++$+++ Yogesh Khandke +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-19 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.290170040E09 +++$+++ Please study the reason behind [[wp:Commonname]], Ganga is an exception to the rule, and this exception is not based on facts.  +++$+++ Please study the reason behind [[wp:Commonname]], Ganga is an exception to the rule, and this exception is not based on facts. [[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 04:34, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
1439 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1438 +++$+++ 1438 +++$+++ 2010-11-19 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.290224400E09 +++$+++ LOL, riiiight. Please watch some English-speaking TV (like CNN, BBC World, Sky One, etc). You might also consider to read some English books about this river. They use the name 'Ganges' and not Ganga. And that is what Commonname is all about.  +++$+++ :LOL, riiiight. Please watch some English-speaking TV (like CNN, BBC World, Sky One, etc). You might also consider to read some English books about this river. They use the name 'Ganges' and not Ganga. And that is what Commonname is all about. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 19:40, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
1440 +++$+++ Yogesh Khandke +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1438 +++$+++ 1439 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.291730400E09 +++$+++ I had left that unanswered, we need hard evidence in the form of [[wp:V]], anecdotal evidence doesnot work, anyways the example has been taken off, please check [[wp:COMMONNAME]]. +++$+++ ::I had left that unanswered, we need hard evidence in the form of [[wp:V]], anecdotal evidence doesnot work, anyways the example has been taken off, please check [[wp:COMMONNAME]].[[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 06:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

525727 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-03 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.186128420E09 +++$+++ Although we are trying to create all the past pages, why don't we first decide on what is going to be on a completed page instead of creating stubs? I think the positions of the top 10 players after each of the 4 days would be appropriate along with any commentary that we can find. It is nice to have blue wikilinked pages in templates, but I think it is more crucial to have well written and completed pages first.  +++$+++ Although we are trying to create all the past pages, why don't we first decide on what is going to be on a completed page instead of creating stubs? I think the positions of the top 10 players after each of the 4 days would be appropriate along with any commentary that we can find. It is nice to have blue wikilinked pages in templates, but I think it is more crucial to have well written and completed pages first. [[User:Supertigerman|Supertigerman]] 01:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
525728 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525727 +++$+++ 525727 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.186128660E09 +++$+++ I also think we should add the money won by each player (this is on golfstats.com). The round-by-round data would have to be deduced by looking at the scores from each round. This would take some time, but why not be the first people to do so, right? :)  +++$+++ :I also think we should add the money won by each player (this is on golfstats.com). The round-by-round data would have to be deduced by looking at the scores from each round. This would take some time, but why not be the first people to do so, right? :) [[User:Supertigerman|Supertigerman]] 01:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
525729 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525727 +++$+++ 525728 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.186128960E09 +++$+++ Sounds good. I'll work on the day by day standings too.  +++$+++ ::Sounds good. I'll work on the day by day standings too. [[User:Supertigerman|Supertigerman]] 01:16, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
525730 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525727 +++$+++ 525729 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.186135260E09 +++$+++ Looks good except for the mysterious E. French (i'll see if Tewapack knows anything about him). I thought of one way to speed things up in terms of listing the first three rounds: Copy and paste the whole table from the masters official website into excel. It will automatically separate into columns. Then you can use \"ctrl+f\" to search and find the lowest scores in any column.  +++$+++ :::Looks good except for the mysterious E. French (i'll see if Tewapack knows anything about him). I thought of one way to speed things up in terms of listing the first three rounds: Copy and paste the whole table from the masters official website into excel. It will automatically separate into columns. Then you can use "ctrl+f" to search and find the lowest scores in any column. [[User:Supertigerman|Supertigerman]] 03:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
525731 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525727 +++$+++ 525730 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.186135560E09 +++$+++ Haha, nice. Have fun! On a separate note, I see that you live in NYC, and I live only about 45 mins from there in northern NJ...  +++$+++ ::::Haha, nice. Have fun! On a separate note, I see that you live in NYC, and I live only about 45 mins from there in northern NJ... [[User:Supertigerman|Supertigerman]] 03:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
525732 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525727 +++$+++ 525731 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.186141500E09 +++$+++ Yep, my sn is rkothari412.  +++$+++ :::::Yep, my sn is rkothari412. [[User:Supertigerman|Supertigerman]] 04:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

263584 +++$+++ Bagel7 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263584 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-24 07:38:00 +++$+++ 1.151159880E09 +++$+++ How is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:TMC1982#Vandalism this] vandalism? Just wondering -  +++$+++ How is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TMC1982#Vandalism this] vandalism? Just wondering - [[User:Bagel7|Bagel7]] 07:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
263585 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263584 +++$+++ 263584 +++$+++ 2006-06-24 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.151183760E09 +++$+++ That's going back sometime, so I'm not quite sure it matters. IIRC it involved a lot of silly little additions that looked like vandalism. I don't want to slur a genuine user, tho. If I was wrong, I'm sorry, but really -- it was over a year ago.  +++$+++ :That's going back sometime, so I'm not quite sure it matters. IIRC it involved a lot of silly little additions that looked like vandalism. I don't want to slur a genuine user, tho. If I was wrong, I'm sorry, but really -- it was over a year ago. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:16, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
263586 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263584 +++$+++ 263584 +++$+++ 2006-06-26 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.151349420E09 +++$+++ Hello. Well, everything needs to be verifiable. If the photograph says that it can be reproduced then I would advise that that permission also needs to be be uploaded and linked to.  +++$+++ :Hello. Well, everything needs to be verifiable. If the photograph says that it can be reproduced then I would advise that that permission also needs to be be uploaded and linked to. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

535969 +++$+++ Privacy +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.176252900E09 +++$+++ I see three keep and two delete votes. Counting the nomination too, it is a three to three tie. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion\/Log\/2007\/April\/3&diff=121703252&oldid=121700703] -  +++$+++ I see three keep and two delete votes. Counting the nomination too, it is a three to three tie. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/2007/April/3&diff=121703252&oldid=121700703] - [[User talk:Privacy|Privacy]] 17:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
535970 +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535969 +++$+++ 535969 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.176271500E09 +++$+++ [[WP:WWIN#Wikipedia_is_not_a_democracy|Wikipedia is not a democracy]]. There may appear to be little concensus in terms of votes alone, but the points raised in support of each vote counts as much, if not more. A whole bunch of sockpuppet suspects engaging in [[Wikipedia:Spam|vote staking]] activities may become counter-productive, as the above shows. I, for one, salutes Amalas for his utmost bravery in closing a couple of these cases!-- +++$+++ :[[WP:WWIN#Wikipedia_is_not_a_democracy|Wikipedia is not a democracy]]. There may appear to be little concensus in terms of votes alone, but the points raised in support of each vote counts as much, if not more. A whole bunch of sockpuppet suspects engaging in [[Wikipedia:Spam|vote staking]] activities may become counter-productive, as the above shows. I, for one, salutes Amalas for his utmost bravery in closing a couple of these cases!--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 23:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
535971 +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535969 +++$+++ 535969 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.176333600E09 +++$+++ Don't mention it, and my deepest apologies, Ma'am! ;)-- +++$+++ :Don't mention it, and my deepest apologies, Ma'am! ;)--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 16:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

263587 +++$+++ Trezjr +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263587 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-26 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.151350800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Trezjr|trezjr]] 12:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
263588 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263587 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-26 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.151351460E09 +++$+++ Nope; the best thing you can do is upload a scan of where it says it can be reproduced, and then make a link to the two images.  +++$+++ ::Nope; the best thing you can do is upload a scan of where it says it can be reproduced, and then make a link to the two images. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

1444 +++$+++ Barroncd +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-11 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.294753140E09 +++$+++ Best to you,   +++$+++ Best to you,  [[User:Barroncd|Barroncd]] ([[User talk:Barroncd|talk]]) 05:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
1445 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1444 +++$+++ 1444 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.294782240E09 +++$+++ We have to read the article [[School of Athens]] carefully. IMHO the identification as Hypatia is more or less sure (there is no question mark behind her name), while the Fayum picture misidentification as Hypatia was probably a mistake created in internet site and then propagated through the web.  The Hypatia-talkpage is the best place for this discussion.  +++$+++ :We have to read the article [[School of Athens]] carefully. IMHO the identification as Hypatia is more or less sure (there is no question mark behind her name), while the Fayum picture misidentification as Hypatia was probably a mistake created in internet site and then propagated through the web.  The Hypatia-talkpage is the best place for this discussion. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 13:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

263589 +++$+++ Trezjr +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-26 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.151353500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Trezjr|trezjr]] 13:25, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
263590 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263589 +++$+++ 263589 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.151467440E09 +++$+++ OK, if you add <nowiki>[[:Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg]]<\/nowiki> to the image description page of the images this applies to, there's a better chance of these surviving. I think it's the closest we can get to verifiability. Rewording it or typing it yourself into wikipedia is not verifiable.  +++$+++ :OK, if you add <nowiki>[[:Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg]]</nowiki> to the image description page of the images this applies to, there's a better chance of these surviving. I think it's the closest we can get to verifiability. Rewording it or typing it yourself into wikipedia is not verifiable. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

1446 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.296161100E09 +++$+++ His mother and antecessor is called [[Maria I of Portugal]] (not Marie II) and his son and successor is called [[Pedro I of Brazil]] not Peter I. American and British historians do not anglicize their names and the articles need consistency. Kind regards, -- +++$+++ His mother and antecessor is called [[Maria I of Portugal]] (not Marie II) and his son and successor is called [[Pedro I of Brazil]] not Peter I. American and British historians do not anglicize their names and the articles need consistency. Kind regards, --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 12:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
1447 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1446 +++$+++ 1446 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.296161460E09 +++$+++ This is not the proper place for a debate over a move-request. The talk-page of the article serves that purpose.  +++$+++ :This is not the proper place for a debate over a move-request. The talk-page of the article serves that purpose. [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 12:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
1448 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1446 +++$+++ 1447 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.296162180E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry. I won't bother you anymore. I was just trying to clarify the matter. Regards, -- +++$+++ ::I'm sorry. I won't bother you anymore. I was just trying to clarify the matter. Regards, --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 13:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

263591 +++$+++ Garykirk +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-27 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.151454900E09 +++$+++ \u2014 [[User:Garykirk|G]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"red\"><B>a<\/B><\/font>]] +++$+++ — [[User:Garykirk|G]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="red"><B>a</B></font>]][[User:Garykirk|rykirk]] | [[User_talk:Garykirk|<sup>talk!</sup>]] 17:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
263592 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263591 +++$+++ 263591 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.151467080E09 +++$+++ Done. Thanks for spotting it.  +++$+++ :Done. Thanks for spotting it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

263593 +++$+++ Striver +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-27 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.151458440E09 +++$+++ Hi. You speedie deleted [[Steve Watson (researcher)]]. Can i ask you to undelete it? -- +++$+++ Hi. You speedie deleted [[Steve Watson (researcher)]]. Can i ask you to undelete it? --[[User:Striver|Striver]] 18:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
263594 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263593 +++$+++ 263593 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.151467020E09 +++$+++ You can certainly ask, but it was deleted on grounds of lack of notability. Freel free to take it to DR.  +++$+++ :You can certainly ask, but it was deleted on grounds of lack of notability. Freel free to take it to DR. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

1451 +++$+++ 65.93.12.101 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1451 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-10 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.302455040E09 +++$+++ Instead of making it a one entry list, wouldn't redirecting [[Equipment and vehicles of the Imperium in Warhammer 40,000]] to [[vehicles of the Imperium in Warhammer 40,000]] be better? That way when the target is deleted, so will this as being a redirect. [[Special:Contributions\/65.93.12.101|65.93.12.101]] ( +++$+++ Instead of making it a one entry list, wouldn't redirecting [[Equipment and vehicles of the Imperium in Warhammer 40,000]] to [[vehicles of the Imperium in Warhammer 40,000]] be better? That way when the target is deleted, so will this as being a redirect. [[Special:Contributions/65.93.12.101|65.93.12.101]] ([[User talk:65.93.12.101|talk]]) 10:04, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
1452 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1451 +++$+++ 1451 +++$+++ 2011-04-10 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.302484920E09 +++$+++ 'When the target is deleted' is being optimistic. It seems that several 40K fans have voted against its deletion. IF it gets deleted at all (and IMHO all these articles should never have been written in the first place) I plan to place a speedy deletion request. Let me deal with one problem at a time. There is no hurry.   +++$+++ :'When the target is deleted' is being optimistic. It seems that several 40K fans have voted against its deletion. IF it gets deleted at all (and IMHO all these articles should never have been written in the first place) I plan to place a speedy deletion request. Let me deal with one problem at a time. There is no hurry.  [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 18:22, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

263596 +++$+++ Budgiekiller +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-30 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.151690760E09 +++$+++ Hey, can you help, I'm being completely vandalised and need to have an IP blocked - it's on the list already.  Or, could you protect my User and Talk pages please?  Cheers.  +++$+++ Hey, can you help, I'm being completely vandalised and need to have an IP blocked - it's on the list already.  Or, could you protect my User and Talk pages please?  Cheers. [[User:Budgiekiller|Budgiekiller]] 11:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
263597 +++$+++ Budgiekiller +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263596 +++$+++ 263596 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.151691060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help!  +++$+++ :Thanks for your help! [[User:Budgiekiller|Budgiekiller]] 11:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

1453 +++$+++ CIS +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1453 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-19 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.303227660E09 +++$+++ Hi, and thanks for the message on my talk page. I've created a new discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism\/Manual of Style#Section on Gregorian calendar .28BCE.29 dates and WP:NPOV]], in an effort to get that arbitrarily added bit removed from the WikiProject MOS there. If we do reach consensus to have it removed, we can then remove the bit you've added to [[WP:ERA]], which I believe defies the whole purpose of WP:ERA's policy of not preferring one notation over the other. If we allow that to stay, eventually people will want to add that BCE\/CE are preferable for Hindu-related articles as well, or Buddhism-related articles, or any ''history-related articles'' at all. I disagree, as I think it is BCE\/CE that are the euphemistic PC terms that should be diminished in use, not the other way around. I think you'd agree. &mdash; ''' +++$+++ Hi, and thanks for the message on my talk page. I've created a new discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism/Manual of Style#Section on Gregorian calendar .28BCE.29 dates and WP:NPOV]], in an effort to get that arbitrarily added bit removed from the WikiProject MOS there. If we do reach consensus to have it removed, we can then remove the bit you've added to [[WP:ERA]], which I believe defies the whole purpose of WP:ERA's policy of not preferring one notation over the other. If we allow that to stay, eventually people will want to add that BCE/CE are preferable for Hindu-related articles as well, or Buddhism-related articles, or any ''history-related articles'' at all. I disagree, as I think it is BCE/CE that are the euphemistic PC terms that should be diminished in use, not the other way around. I think you'd agree. &mdash; '''[[user:CIS|''CIS'']]''' <sup>(''[[User talk:CIS|talk]]'' </sup> | <small>''[[Special:Contributions/CIS|stalk]]'')</small> 08:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
1454 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1453 +++$+++ 1453 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.309043580E09 +++$+++ OK! What I have just discovered is that I don't need to be P.C. I'll stop now. toodle-oo!  +++$+++ :OK! What I have just discovered is that I don't need to be P.C. I'll stop now. toodle-oo! [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 16:13, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

263598 +++$+++ CQJ +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263598 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-30 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.151727000E09 +++$+++ If I didn't have to go to work shortly, I'd stick around and help you fix it all :-)   +++$+++ If I didn't have to go to work shortly, I'd stick around and help you fix it all :-)  [[User:CQJ|CQJ]] 21:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
263599 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263598 +++$+++ 263598 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.151733540E09 +++$+++ Cheers. Everything seems to have been reverted already. I'm not sure how he managed to evade his block. Bless his little cotton socks.  +++$+++ :Cheers. Everything seems to have been reverted already. I'm not sure how he managed to evade his block. Bless his little cotton socks. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

1456 +++$+++ Varlaam +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1456 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311645360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Varlaam|Varlaam]] ([[User talk:Varlaam|talk]]) 18:56, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
1457 +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1456 +++$+++ 1456 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311645720E09 +++$+++ Some of these categories are a bit dubious and contradictory. Where is the required source about Amy Winehouse's religion? Did she regularly attend Jewish religious ceremonies? Did she say that she followed Judaism? Do we simply inherit our parents religion perhaps? Was she a singer of London? Was she a singer of a specific district of London?  +++$+++ : Some of these categories are a bit dubious and contradictory. Where is the required source about Amy Winehouse's religion? Did she regularly attend Jewish religious ceremonies? Did she say that she followed Judaism? Do we simply inherit our parents religion perhaps? Was she a singer of London? Was she a singer of a specific district of London? [[User:Flamarande|Flamarande]] ([[User talk:Flamarande#top|talk]]) 19:02, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
1458 +++$+++ Varlaam +++$+++ Flamarande +++$+++ 1456 +++$+++ 1457 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311692460E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Varlaam|Varlaam]] ([[User talk:Varlaam|talk]]) 08:01, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

525745 +++$+++ 123.255.54.235 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-29 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.191063120E09 +++$+++ Um.. why did you undo my contribution to the Puka page? If military slang has a place in it, surely a language has a place in it also? +++$+++ Um.. why did you undo my contribution to the Puka page? If military slang has a place in it, surely a language has a place in it also?[[User:123.255.54.235|123.255.54.235]] 03:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
525746 +++$+++ 123.255.54.235 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.191063540E09 +++$+++ Then take away the military slang, also why should just english get a precedence? I thought the idea of this thing was a COMPLETE encyclopedia? +++$+++ :: Then take away the military slang, also why should just english get a precedence? I thought the idea of this thing was a COMPLETE encyclopedia?[[User:123.255.54.235|123.255.54.235]] 03:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
525747 +++$+++ 123.255.54.235 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.191063780E09 +++$+++ Um... there arent any references on that page.  +++$+++ ::Um... there arent any references on that page. [[User:123.255.54.235|123.255.54.235]] 04:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
525748 +++$+++ 123.255.54.235 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.191064200E09 +++$+++ Fine, but I'm fairly sure the disambiguation pages don't have any references. +++$+++ :::Fine, but I'm fairly sure the disambiguation pages don't have any references.[[User:123.255.54.235|123.255.54.235]] 04:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
525749 +++$+++ 123.255.54.235 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.191065820E09 +++$+++ How do I link the ref tag to the actual reference? +++$+++ ::::How do I link the ref tag to the actual reference?[[User:123.255.54.235|123.255.54.235]] 04:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

263602 +++$+++ Trezjr +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-02 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.151905200E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Trezjr|trezjr]] 22:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
263603 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263602 +++$+++ 263602 +++$+++ 2006-07-02 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.151907300E09 +++$+++ Why? What is the comment you want to make? What do you think has been done wrong? And it's unlikely that Tony image can be used without '''proof''' that it comes from a [[press kit]]. It is not a [[screenshot]].   +++$+++ :Why? What is the comment you want to make? What do you think has been done wrong? And it's unlikely that Tony image can be used without '''proof''' that it comes from a [[press kit]]. It is not a [[screenshot]].  [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

263604 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I have deleted your article at Ebenezer (1997 TV) because it's a copy of http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/B00008G8CT\/102-9910219-5257721?v=glance&n=404272. Please don't copy and paste material from other locations. If you want to rewrite it in your own words, please do so. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ I have deleted your article at Ebenezer (1997 TV) because it's a copy of http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00008G8CT/102-9910219-5257721?v=glance&n=404272. Please don't copy and paste material from other locations. If you want to rewrite it in your own words, please do so. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
263605 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263604 +++$+++ 263604 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Whether you are the person who wrote the amazon review is of no consequence, since the amazon information is copyrighted to amazon and we cannot use it. Even if you were the person who wrote it, you did not say so anywhere and release the information under the GFDL, therefore we cannot use it. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :Whether you are the person who wrote the amazon review is of no consequence, since the amazon information is copyrighted to amazon and we cannot use it. Even if you were the person who wrote it, you did not say so anywhere and release the information under the GFDL, therefore we cannot use it. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
263606 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263604 +++$+++ 263605 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ If you contacted me first, I could have removed the Amazon piece--and it wasn't a rip-off. If you checked the time stamps, you would have seen the article was written BEFORE the Amazon piece was posted. trezjr 21:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ ::If you contacted me first, I could have removed the Amazon piece--and it wasn't a rip-off. If you checked the time stamps, you would have seen the article was written BEFORE the Amazon piece was posted. trezjr 21:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
263607 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263604 +++$+++ 263606 +++$+++ 2006-07-03 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.151942880E09 +++$+++ I can remember tagging that article because the tone was clearly inappropriate. Perhaps Zoe should have tagged is as a copyright problem before deleting it. But then after she removed the 'review' she may have decided to delete it under [[WP:CSD]] A3 (as no context) -- a valid decision. Zoe was ''possibly'' a little harsh in deleting it straight away -- but I can still see and understand why it has been. I wouldn't advise taking it further because you don't have a good grasp yet of policy to argue your case propery. Also, it's just an article about a TV movie. Nothing serious. Perhaps if you were prepared to write a proper article you could do so under a correct name, such as [[Ebenezer (TV film)]]? Zoe is also correct in her comments about copyright and ownership. Like Wikipedia, once you submit your text to a site, you lose ownership.  +++$+++ :::I can remember tagging that article because the tone was clearly inappropriate. Perhaps Zoe should have tagged is as a copyright problem before deleting it. But then after she removed the 'review' she may have decided to delete it under [[WP:CSD]] A3 (as no context) -- a valid decision. Zoe was ''possibly'' a little harsh in deleting it straight away -- but I can still see and understand why it has been. I wouldn't advise taking it further because you don't have a good grasp yet of policy to argue your case propery. Also, it's just an article about a TV movie. Nothing serious. Perhaps if you were prepared to write a proper article you could do so under a correct name, such as [[Ebenezer (TV film)]]? Zoe is also correct in her comments about copyright and ownership. Like Wikipedia, once you submit your text to a site, you lose ownership. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
263608 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263604 +++$+++ 263607 +++$+++ 2006-07-03 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.151943300E09 +++$+++ Additionally, before taking it to requests for comment (which is inflicting work upon a lot of other wikipedians), it is usually best to persue the issue with the relevant parties (i.e. Zoe). RFC is usually a last resort when communication has broken down. I notice there were only a couple of exchanges between Zoe and yourself -- why did you decide to leave teh conversation and involve Feydey and myself? Zoe doesn't bite, you know -- I'm sure she'd happily answer your questions.  +++$+++ ::::Additionally, before taking it to requests for comment (which is inflicting work upon a lot of other wikipedians), it is usually best to persue the issue with the relevant parties (i.e. Zoe). RFC is usually a last resort when communication has broken down. I notice there were only a couple of exchanges between Zoe and yourself -- why did you decide to leave teh conversation and involve Feydey and myself? Zoe doesn't bite, you know -- I'm sure she'd happily answer your questions. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

1462 +++$+++ R'n'B +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-18 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.179518460E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px|]] Your recent edit to [[List of 2000s one-hit wonders in the United States]] included one or more links to the page{{{{{subst|}}}#if: {{{2|}}}|s|}} [[Blur]]{{#if: {{{3|}}}|, [[{{{3}}}]],|}}{{#if: {{{2|}}}|  and [[{{{2}}}]],|,}} which {{{{{subst|}}}#if: {{{2|}}}| are | is a }} [[Wikipedia:disambiguation|disambiguation]] page{{{{{subst|}}}#if: {{{2|}}}|s|}}. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can [[WP:DPL|help Wikipedia]] by revising the links you added to [[List of 2000s one-hit wonders in the United States]] to refer directly to the most relevant topic.  (This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:R%27n%27B&action=edit&section=new report the error] to help us improve this feature.) Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Ambiglink -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px|]] Your recent edit to [[List of 2000s one-hit wonders in the United States]] included one or more links to the page{{{{{subst|}}}#if: {{{2|}}}|s|}} [[Blur]]{{#if: {{{3|}}}|, [[{{{3}}}]],|}}{{#if: {{{2|}}}|  and [[{{{2}}}]],|,}} which {{{{{subst|}}}#if: {{{2|}}}| are | is a }} [[Wikipedia:disambiguation|disambiguation]] page{{{{{subst|}}}#if: {{{2|}}}|s|}}. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can [[WP:DPL|help Wikipedia]] by revising the links you added to [[List of 2000s one-hit wonders in the United States]] to refer directly to the most relevant topic.  (This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:R%27n%27B&action=edit&section=new report the error] to help us improve this feature.) Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Ambiglink --> [[User:R'n'B|Russ]] [[User talk:R'n'B|(talk)]] 13:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
1463 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1462 +++$+++ 1462 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.179518520E09 +++$+++ Yeah. I know. My bad.  +++$+++ :Yeah. I know. My bad. [[User:Doc Strange|Doc Strange]] 13:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

525751 +++$+++ JLaTondre +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-29 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.191102120E09 +++$+++ Please do not make copy-n-paste moves as you did with [[Antonio Cerda]] to [[Antonio Cerd\xe1]]. Copy-n-paste moves shouldn't be done as they disassociate the edit history which causes [[WP:GFDL|GFDL]] compliance issues. You should [[WP:MOVE|move]] pages instead. I have fixed this one. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Please do not make copy-n-paste moves as you did with [[Antonio Cerda]] to [[Antonio Cerdá]]. Copy-n-paste moves shouldn't be done as they disassociate the edit history which causes [[WP:GFDL|GFDL]] compliance issues. You should [[WP:MOVE|move]] pages instead. I have fixed this one. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] 14:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
525752 +++$+++ JLaTondre +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525751 +++$+++ 525751 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.191103260E09 +++$+++ No problem. -- +++$+++ :No problem. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] 15:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

1464 +++$+++ Acegikmo1 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-24 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.180055580E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Acegikmo1|Acegikmo1]] 18:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
1465 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1464 +++$+++ 1464 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.180121040E09 +++$+++ The #56 is from Mediabase, and i AM counting Bubbling Under, read the footnote, plz!  +++$+++ :The #56 is from Mediabase, and i AM counting Bubbling Under, read the footnote, plz! [[User:Doc Strange|Doc Strange]] 12:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
1466 +++$+++ Acegikmo1 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1464 +++$+++ 1465 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.180500960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Acegikmo1|Acegikmo1]] 21:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
1467 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1464 +++$+++ 1466 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.180553040E09 +++$+++ Yeah. It's my footnote. Go ahead.  +++$+++ :::Yeah. It's my footnote. Go ahead. [[User:Doc Strange|Doc Strange]] 12:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

263610 +++$+++ Trezjr +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263610 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-02 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.151907600E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Trezjr|trezjr]] 23:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
263611 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263610 +++$+++ 263610 +++$+++ 2006-07-03 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.151942340E09 +++$+++ Something scneed in is the same as uploading stuff from theinterenet. It's worse, in fact, as we can't ''verify'' the source or the copyright status. I assume that when you say \"own\", you actually mean \"possess\"? How is anyone supposed to verify the status or source of something that's sitting in your home?  +++$+++ :Something scneed in is the same as uploading stuff from theinterenet. It's worse, in fact, as we can't ''verify'' the source or the copyright status. I assume that when you say "own", you actually mean "possess"? How is anyone supposed to verify the status or source of something that's sitting in your home? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
263612 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263610 +++$+++ 263610 +++$+++ 2006-07-03 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.151943540E09 +++$+++ Oh, and \"Source: I made it myself.\" is certainly not good enough when you didn't. Unless you directed the video. Do not upload that image unless you are prepared to tell us the source. Which music video??? I'm sure I've already explained taht on the image page.  +++$+++ :Oh, and "Source: I made it myself." is certainly not good enough when you didn't. Unless you directed the video. Do not upload that image unless you are prepared to tell us the source. Which music video??? I'm sure I've already explained taht on the image page. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
263613 +++$+++ Trezjr +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263610 +++$+++ 263612 +++$+++ 2006-07-02 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.151908740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Trezjr|trezjr]] 23:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
263614 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263610 +++$+++ 263613 +++$+++ 2006-07-03 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.151942340E09 +++$+++ Nope - a title card is just that. It is usually characterised by featuring the film's title. Hence \"title card\".  +++$+++ :::Nope - a title card is just that. It is usually characterised by featuring the film's title. Hence "title card". [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

525756 +++$+++ ThisIsAce +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191898260E09 +++$+++ Hi.  Just set your ''uncategorised'' tag on your ref page to <nowiki><nowiki> <\/nowiki><\/nowiki>. Otherwise, your page appears on our list of pages needing categories ! Hope you don't mind. :-)  +++$+++ Hi.  Just set your ''uncategorised'' tag on your ref page to <nowiki><nowiki> </nowiki></nowiki>. Otherwise, your page appears on our list of pages needing categories ! Hope you don't mind. :-) [[User:ThisIsAce|thisisace]] 19:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
525757 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.191898680E09 +++$+++ Ah, I did not realize, I made them all nowiki, thanks.  +++$+++ :* Ah, I did not realize, I made them all nowiki, thanks. [[User:Michfan2123|michfan2123]] 19:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
525758 +++$+++ ThisIsAce +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.191898980E09 +++$+++ Thanks, mate. :-)  +++$+++ ::* Thanks, mate. :-) [[User:ThisIsAce|thisisace]] 20:03, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

1470 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-23 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.195853040E09 +++$+++ Those two will also be put up for deletion once that one is over. They weren't put together to avoid votes that had little to do with the topic at hand. If you feel that it should be kept, can you please revise your vote to speak about the article's own merits?  +++$+++ Those two will also be put up for deletion once that one is over. They weren't put together to avoid votes that had little to do with the topic at hand. If you feel that it should be kept, can you please revise your vote to speak about the article's own merits? [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 13:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
1471 +++$+++ Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1470 +++$+++ 1470 +++$+++ 2007-11-23 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.195875060E09 +++$+++ I can't realistically see the Master Shake one ending in anything worse than a \"No Consensus,\" so it would be unnecessary to nominate Frylock or Meatwad.  Best, --<font face=\"Times New Roman\"> +++$+++ :I can't realistically see the Master Shake one ending in anything worse than a "No Consensus," so it would be unnecessary to nominate Frylock or Meatwad.  Best, --<font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|<span style="color:#009">Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|Tally-ho!]]''</sup> 19:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

263618 +++$+++ Zoe +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-04 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.151998320E09 +++$+++ Eh.  I have more to do than worry about what people think of me.  Thanks for the heads up, though.   +++$+++ Eh.  I have more to do than worry about what people think of me.  Thanks for the heads up, though.  [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 00:32, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
263619 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263618 +++$+++ 263618 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.152301020E09 +++$+++ I've already expressed my opinions. Could you lease keep the discussion in one place: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/AFreeWorld]]. Cheers.  +++$+++ :I've already expressed my opinions. Could you lease keep the discussion in one place: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFreeWorld]]. Cheers. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

525763 +++$+++ Rise Above the Vile +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-25 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.193298840E09 +++$+++ In your RFA you mentioned that you wanted to \"revert vandalism at a faster rate,\" there are several tools you can use to do this that do not require admin status.  You might find  +++$+++ In your RFA you mentioned that you wanted to "revert vandalism at a faster rate," there are several tools you can use to do this that do not require admin status.  You might find [[User:Lupin/Anti-vandal tool|Lupin's Anti-vandal tool]] and [[WP:TWINKLE]] helpful.  Also, there are several external programs such as [[WP:MWT]] that you can use to monitor vandalism.  Lastly, after reverting vandalism, consider warning the vandals with [[WP:WARN|these templates]].--[[User talk:Rise Above the Vile|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Rise Above The </font><font color="black">Vile</font></font>]] 00:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
525764 +++$+++ Rise Above the Vile +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525763 +++$+++ 525763 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.193299860E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about using those scripts or warning vandals feel free to ask me.  No one can fault you for trying to become an admin, its admirable that you wish to take on more responsibility to help the project.  Hopefully, your future RFA will be more successful.  Best of luck!-- +++$+++ :If you have any questions about using those scripts or warning vandals feel free to ask me.  No one can fault you for trying to become an admin, its admirable that you wish to take on more responsibility to help the project.  Hopefully, your future RFA will be more successful.  Best of luck!--[[User talk:Rise Above the Vile|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Rise Above The </font><font color="black">Vile</font></font>]] 01:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
525765 +++$+++ Rise Above the Vile +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525763 +++$+++ 525764 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.193301000E09 +++$+++ You set up your  +++$+++ ::You set up your [[User:Michfan2123/monobook.js|monobook.js]] wrong.  Insert "importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkle.js');" (minus the quotations) and reload the page by pressing Control-Shift-R in Firefox or Control-F5 in Internet Explorer.--[[User talk:Rise Above the Vile|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Rise Above The </font><font color="black">Vile</font></font>]] 01:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
525766 +++$+++ Rise Above the Vile +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525763 +++$+++ 525765 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.193301300E09 +++$+++ Great, feel free to contact me if you need any further help.-- +++$+++ :::Great, feel free to contact me if you need any further help.--[[User talk:Rise Above the Vile|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Rise Above The </font><font color="black">Vile</font></font>]] 01:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
525767 +++$+++ Rise Above the Vile +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525763 +++$+++ 525766 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.193301600E09 +++$+++ Hmm...Can you give me a detailed description of whats going on?  Have you installed the program and it just won't open or can you not get it to install?-- +++$+++ ::::Hmm...Can you give me a detailed description of whats going on?  Have you installed the program and it just won't open or can you not get it to install?--[[User talk:Rise Above the Vile|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Rise Above The </font><font color="black">Vile</font></font>]] 01:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
525768 +++$+++ Rise Above the Vile +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525763 +++$+++ 525767 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.193301900E09 +++$+++ There is a bug affecting some users where MWT will close if IE is running simultaneously, try closing all internet browsers and then running MWT.-- +++$+++ :::::There is a bug affecting some users where MWT will close if IE is running simultaneously, try closing all internet browsers and then running MWT.--[[User talk:Rise Above the Vile|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Rise Above The </font><font color="black">Vile</font></font>]] 01:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

263620 +++$+++ Bob Castle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.152311160E09 +++$+++ Hi, JPS - there is a little bit of a problem over at [[Jeremy Clarkson]]. An IP address is repeatedly adding the same POV comment, and is being reverted each time by numerous editors. It has been requested several times that the user discuss this change on the talk page, as it is clearly controversial, but it is simply re-added each time. A few warnings were added to one of the user's talk pages, but the IP seems to keep changing, as well as appearing with two different user accounts, although they are presumably the same person. Several editors have expressed concern about breaching the 3 revert rule. I was wondering what should be done. Thanks in advance.  +++$+++ Hi, JPS - there is a little bit of a problem over at [[Jeremy Clarkson]]. An IP address is repeatedly adding the same POV comment, and is being reverted each time by numerous editors. It has been requested several times that the user discuss this change on the talk page, as it is clearly controversial, but it is simply re-added each time. A few warnings were added to one of the user's talk pages, but the IP seems to keep changing, as well as appearing with two different user accounts, although they are presumably the same person. Several editors have expressed concern about breaching the 3 revert rule. I was wondering what should be done. Thanks in advance. [[User:Bob Castle|Bob]] 15:26, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
263621 +++$+++ Bob Castle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263620 +++$+++ 263620 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.152550440E09 +++$+++ Hello again, thanks for your response last time, although unfortunately the same IP is still adding the same paragraph to the biography section, despite his quotation being integrated in the correct section. Is there a warning suitable to ask the IP to stop? Thanks.  +++$+++ :Hello again, thanks for your response last time, although unfortunately the same IP is still adding the same paragraph to the biography section, despite his quotation being integrated in the correct section. Is there a warning suitable to ask the IP to stop? Thanks. [[User:Bob Castle|Bob]] 09:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
263622 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263620 +++$+++ 263621 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.152554820E09 +++$+++ You can use <nowiki>{{3RR}} or the more severe {{3RR4|Jeremy Clarkson}} <\/nowiki> (I've left the former) on the user's talk page. You can also report it to [[WP:AN3|3RR]]  +++$+++ ::You can use <nowiki>{{3RR}} or the more severe {{3RR4|Jeremy Clarkson}} </nowiki> (I've left the former) on the user's talk page. You can also report it to [[WP:AN3|3RR]] [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:07, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
263623 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263620 +++$+++ 263620 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.152592500E09 +++$+++ I'd be very interested to know what you think my political agenda is. It seems that you're the one who is using Wikipedia to make a political point.  +++$+++ :I'd be very interested to know what you think my political agenda is. It seems that you're the one who is using Wikipedia to make a political point. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
263624 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263620 +++$+++ 263620 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.152594000E09 +++$+++ Interesting!! And here's me thinking I was blocking you for violating our 3RR policy and not discussing changes on the page. Have you ever thought that the selection of quotes is subjective?  +++$+++ :Interesting!! And here's me thinking I was blocking you for violating our 3RR policy and not discussing changes on the page. Have you ever thought that the selection of quotes is subjective? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:00, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
263625 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263620 +++$+++ 263620 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.152594780E09 +++$+++ So it's OK to use Wikipedia to further a political agenda so long as it's yours?  +++$+++ :So it's OK to use Wikipedia to further a political agenda so long as it's yours? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

1477 +++$+++ Bondegezou +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-28 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.201573620E09 +++$+++ Hi. You recently argued for the deletion of [[Michelle Leonard]] on the grounds that it is largely [[WP:BOLLOCKS]]. Since then, the page has been considerably re-written. Nearly everything in the original article checked out\u2014there was little that was bollocks at all! So I thought you might want to re-consider your position in the deletion discussion.  +++$+++ Hi. You recently argued for the deletion of [[Michelle Leonard]] on the grounds that it is largely [[WP:BOLLOCKS]]. Since then, the page has been considerably re-written. Nearly everything in the original article checked out—there was little that was bollocks at all! So I thought you might want to re-consider your position in the deletion discussion. [[User:Bondegezou|Bondegezou]] ([[User talk:Bondegezou|talk]]) 18:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
1478 +++$+++ VegKilla +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1477 +++$+++ 1477 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.202112060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:VegKilla|VegKilla]] ([[User talk:VegKilla|talk]]) 00:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

306081 +++$+++ Fetchcomms +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 306081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-26 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.264571280E09 +++$+++ {{od}} You'll have to remove the images individually. The image is not hosted here, so you can't actually delete it from here. <span style=\"border:1px solid;\"> +++$+++ {{od}} You'll have to remove the images individually. The image is not hosted here, so you can't actually delete it from here. <span style="border:1px solid;">[[User:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">&nbsp;fetch</span>''']][[User talk:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">comms</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black;">☛</span>]]</span> 21:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
306082 +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 306081 +++$+++ 306081 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.264571520E09 +++$+++ So discuss at [[WP:VP]] so ?  +++$+++ :So discuss at [[WP:VP]] so ? [[User:Gnevin|Gnevin]] ([[User talk:Gnevin#top|talk]]) 21:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
306083 +++$+++ Fetchcomms +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 306081 +++$+++ 306082 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.264571640E09 +++$+++ I suppose, as I don't really know of any way to remove lots of the same images at once manually (I think there is a bot that does it for deleted images or something though). <span style=\"border:1px solid;\"> +++$+++ ::I suppose, as I don't really know of any way to remove lots of the same images at once manually (I think there is a bot that does it for deleted images or something though). <span style="border:1px solid;">[[User:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">&nbsp;fetch</span>''']][[User talk:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">comms</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black;">☛</span>]]</span> 21:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
306084 +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 306081 +++$+++ 306083 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.264573020E09 +++$+++ OK thanks  +++$+++ :::OK thanks [[User:Gnevin|Gnevin]] ([[User talk:Gnevin#top|talk]]) 22:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

1480 +++$+++ 203.194.7.100 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1480 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-17 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.203284580E09 +++$+++ I did not remove any speedy deletion notices from pages I have created myself.  [[Special:Contributions\/203.194.7.100|203.194.7.100]] ( +++$+++ I did not remove any speedy deletion notices from pages I have created myself.  [[Special:Contributions/203.194.7.100|203.194.7.100]] ([[User talk:203.194.7.100|talk]]) 13:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
1481 +++$+++ 203.194.7.100 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1480 +++$+++ 1480 +++$+++ 2008-02-17 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.203285600E09 +++$+++ I win. [[Special:Contributions\/203.194.7.100|203.194.7.100]] ( +++$+++ : I win. [[Special:Contributions/203.194.7.100|203.194.7.100]] ([[User talk:203.194.7.100|talk]]) 14:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
1482 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1480 +++$+++ 1481 +++$+++ 2008-02-17 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.203289920E09 +++$+++ It's a fair cop.  +++$+++ ::It's a fair cop. [[User:Doc Strange|Doc Strange]] ([[User talk:Doc Strange#top|talk]]) 15:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

525769 +++$+++ Rise Above the Vile +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-25 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.193302560E09 +++$+++ It should say something along the lines of \"your not currently on the list\" and then adds you to the list...Try downloading the file again and reinstalling it.  You're leaving all the extracted files (including the .exe) in the same folder you extracted them to, right?-- +++$+++ It should say something along the lines of "your not currently on the list" and then adds you to the list...Try downloading the file again and reinstalling it.  You're leaving all the extracted files (including the .exe) in the same folder you extracted them to, right?--[[User talk:Rise Above the Vile|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Rise Above The </font><font color="black">Vile</font></font>]] 01:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
525770 +++$+++ Rise Above the Vile +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525769 +++$+++ 525769 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.193302920E09 +++$+++ I don't think that manually adding your name to the list will solve the problem.  Unfortunately, I think we've exhaust my limited knowledge on this subject.  Since I'm not familiar with the code I don't think I can be of further help to you.  You might try bringing this issue up on [irc:\/\/freenode\/mwt #mwt] on [[freenode]], or on [[Wikipedia talk:MWT]].  Sorry I couldn't be of more help.-- +++$+++ :I don't think that manually adding your name to the list will solve the problem.  Unfortunately, I think we've exhaust my limited knowledge on this subject.  Since I'm not familiar with the code I don't think I can be of further help to you.  You might try bringing this issue up on [irc://freenode/mwt #mwt] on [[freenode]], or on [[Wikipedia talk:MWT]].  Sorry I couldn't be of more help.--[[User talk:Rise Above the Vile|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Rise Above The </font><font color="black">Vile</font></font>]] 02:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

263626 +++$+++ Repmart +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-14 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.152933000E09 +++$+++ Yeh this TheJPS is TOTALLY crooked... she\/he has marked all of my contributions for deletion. A real sore loser. The chick\/guy tried to have a battle of wits armed with a peanut, then got all upset and tried to delete all of my contributions. The site is run by broads\/guys like this? I know that a few complaints have been made about her\/him. Real bitter person. Ugly in character.  What does JPS stand for, TheJPS?-- +++$+++ Yeh this TheJPS is TOTALLY crooked... she/he has marked all of my contributions for deletion. A real sore loser. The chick/guy tried to have a battle of wits armed with a peanut, then got all upset and tried to delete all of my contributions. The site is run by broads/guys like this? I know that a few complaints have been made about her/him. Real bitter person. Ugly in character.  What does JPS stand for, TheJPS?--[[User:Repmart|Repmart]] 20:10, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
263627 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263626 +++$+++ 263626 +++$+++ 2006-07-15 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.152948840E09 +++$+++ Old ladies on buses.  +++$+++ :Old ladies on buses. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 00:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
263628 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263626 +++$+++ 263626 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.152511680E09 +++$+++ Your article was deleted because the subject is not notable enough for Wikipedia. I'm sure it is a very fine company and is appreciated by all those who view its productions. '''Importantly,''' please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>  Your post looked like it was written by me.  +++$+++ :Your article was deleted because the subject is not notable enough for Wikipedia. I'm sure it is a very fine company and is appreciated by all those who view its productions. '''Importantly,''' please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>  Your post looked like it was written by me. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

393463 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-11 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.207945500E09 +++$+++ The current consensus is that the aticle is merged\/redirect to that superbowl article. Please discuss your edits first on the discussion page of either article before reverting again.  +++$+++ The current consensus is that the aticle is merged/redirect to that superbowl article. Please discuss your edits first on the discussion page of either article before reverting again. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 13:25, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
393464 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393463 +++$+++ 393463 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.207954320E09 +++$+++ Bad faith? At least I kept the bad article instead of just the redirect. Stop talking nonsense.  +++$+++ :Bad faith? At least I kept the bad article instead of just the redirect. Stop talking nonsense. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 15:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
393465 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393463 +++$+++ 393464 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.207975680E09 +++$+++ Oh, and be civil, it really is not that hard. Calling other editors \"thug friends\" is not acceptable.  +++$+++ ::Oh, and be civil, it really is not that hard. Calling other editors "thug friends" is not acceptable. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 21:48, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

1485 +++$+++ Indopug +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-16 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.205670600E09 +++$+++ Could you tell me your source of information for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=The_Strokes_discography&diff=132687937&oldid=127483798 this edit] you made on [[20 May]] [[2007]]? The Billboard website agrees with the previous entry. Thank you,  +++$+++ Could you tell me your source of information for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Strokes_discography&diff=132687937&oldid=127483798 this edit] you made on [[20 May]] [[2007]]? The Billboard website agrees with the previous entry. Thank you, [[User:Indopug|indopug]] ([[User talk:Indopug|talk]]) 05:30, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
1486 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1485 +++$+++ 1485 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 07:53:00 +++$+++ 1.205679180E09 +++$+++ Actually, Billboard agrees with me: Here [http:\/\/acharts.us\/song\/949] and [http:\/\/www.allmusic.com\/cg\/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:3bfyxqukldje~T51]. This shows that \"Juicebox\" by The Strokes hit #98 on the Billboard Hot 100. You see, \"Juicebox\" hit #65 on the Billboard ''Pop 100'', which is a different chart from the [[Billboard Hot 100]]. When people talk about the \"US Charts\", they're talking about the Hot 100, not the Pop 100. In fact [http:\/\/www.billboard.com\/bbcom\/retrieve_chart_history.do?model.vnuArtistId=442195&model.vnuAlbumId=752565 Billboard's own Artist chart page] shows ''no'' entry on the Hot 100 for Juicebox, despite All Music Guide's insistence that it does  +++$+++ :Actually, Billboard agrees with me: Here [http://acharts.us/song/949] and [http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:3bfyxqukldje~T51]. This shows that "Juicebox" by The Strokes hit #98 on the Billboard Hot 100. You see, "Juicebox" hit #65 on the Billboard ''Pop 100'', which is a different chart from the [[Billboard Hot 100]]. When people talk about the "US Charts", they're talking about the Hot 100, not the Pop 100. In fact [http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/retrieve_chart_history.do?model.vnuArtistId=442195&model.vnuAlbumId=752565 Billboard's own Artist chart page] shows ''no'' entry on the Hot 100 for Juicebox, despite All Music Guide's insistence that it does [[User:Doc Strange| Doc Strange]]<sup>[[User talk:Doc Strange|Mailbox Orbitting Black Hole]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Doc Strange|Strange Frequencies]]</small> 07:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
1487 +++$+++ Indopug +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1485 +++$+++ 1486 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.205779740E09 +++$+++ Agreed, I've significantly reworked the article; and I've put #65 under Pop 100. Since ''Billboard'' itself doesn't list it, I'm not listing the Billboard Hot 100 entry.  +++$+++ ::Agreed, I've significantly reworked the article; and I've put #65 under Pop 100. Since ''Billboard'' itself doesn't list it, I'm not listing the Billboard Hot 100 entry. [[User:Indopug|indopug]] ([[User talk:Indopug|talk]]) 11:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

263632 +++$+++ Budgiekiller +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-12 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.152754140E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for locking my [[User:Budgiekiller|user page]] when I requested some help from some keen IP vandals.  I think time has come for the page to become access all areas again.  Please, when you find the time, restore my page to the unlocked world!  Cheers for your help.   +++$+++ Hey, thanks for locking my [[User:Budgiekiller|user page]] when I requested some help from some keen IP vandals.  I think time has come for the page to become access all areas again.  Please, when you find the time, restore my page to the unlocked world!  Cheers for your help.  [[User:Budgiekiller|Budgiekiller]] 18:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
263633 +++$+++ Budgiekiller +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263632 +++$+++ 263632 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.152756960E09 +++$+++ Cheers for that.   +++$+++ :Cheers for that.  [[User:Budgiekiller|Budgiekiller]] 19:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
263634 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263632 +++$+++ 263633 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.152757200E09 +++$+++ You're welcome :)  +++$+++ ::You're welcome :) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

1490 +++$+++ NewAtThis +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-31 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.206961260E09 +++$+++ [[Gayelle (lesbian)]], I have added many new RS to the article and therefore I would like you to reconsider your vote that was based on a previous version that did not take your WP:NEO or WP:N and WP:RS and WP:V concerns into account. +++$+++ [[Gayelle (lesbian)]], I have added many new RS to the article and therefore I would like you to reconsider your vote that was based on a previous version that did not take your WP:NEO or WP:N and WP:RS and WP:V concerns into account.[[User:NewAtThis|NewAtThis]] ([[User talk:NewAtThis|talk]]) 04:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
1491 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1490 +++$+++ 1490 +++$+++ 2008-03-31 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.206994500E09 +++$+++ Nope, this is still a [[WP:NEO]] and you have still not produced the alleged CBS News article to prove that source's existence.  +++$+++ :Nope, this is still a [[WP:NEO]] and you have still not produced the alleged CBS News article to prove that source's existence. [[User:Doc Strange| Doc Strange]]<sup>[[User talk:Doc Strange|Mailbox]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Doc Strange|Logbook]]</small> 13:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
1492 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1490 +++$+++ 1490 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.207258980E09 +++$+++ This user turned out to be a sockpuppet and the page was speedy deleted after a discussion [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Gayelle (lesbian)|here]]. By the end of the discussion, the [[WP:NEO]], [[WP:N]], [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:V]] violations were ''not'' fixed.  +++$+++ :This user turned out to be a sockpuppet and the page was speedy deleted after a discussion [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayelle (lesbian)|here]]. By the end of the discussion, the [[WP:NEO]], [[WP:N]], [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:V]] violations were ''not'' fixed. [[User:Doc Strange| Doc Strange]]<sup>[[User talk:Doc Strange|Mailbox]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Doc Strange|Logbook]]</small> 14:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

263635 +++$+++ Zoe +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-15 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.152953160E09 +++$+++ in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FTramper_Price&diff=63882989&oldid=63882452 this edit], which I have removed.  Once I leave here, I will be admonishing the user who added it.   +++$+++ in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FTramper_Price&diff=63882989&oldid=63882452 this edit], which I have removed.  Once I leave here, I will be admonishing the user who added it.  [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 01:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
263636 +++$+++ Zoe +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263635 +++$+++ 263635 +++$+++ 2006-07-15 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.153024080E09 +++$+++ I got an email from our buddy \"Repmart\" threatening to create a website attacking you and me.  I told him if he does, expect a permanent ban here.   +++$+++ :I got an email from our buddy "Repmart" threatening to create a website attacking you and me.  I told him if he does, expect a permanent ban here.  [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 21:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
263637 +++$+++ Zoe +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263635 +++$+++ 263635 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.153108020E09 +++$+++ and now see [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#More pleasantries from User:Repmart]].   +++$+++ :and now see [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#More pleasantries from User:Repmart]].  [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 20:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
263638 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263635 +++$+++ 263635 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.153108620E09 +++$+++ Cheers, Zoe. lol  +++$+++ :Cheers, Zoe. lol [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

1493 +++$+++ Wakandas black panther +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-18 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.211095860E09 +++$+++ But I encourage you to add it. '''''[[Stan Lee|Excelsior]]'''''! -  +++$+++ But I encourage you to add it. '''''[[Stan Lee|Excelsior]]'''''! - [[User:Wakandas_black_panther|<small>Wakanda's</small> Black Panther!]]<span style="color:#000000">'''[[User talk:Wakandas black panther|&spades;]]'''</span>/<span style="color:#FF0000">'''[[Special:Contributions/Wakandas black panther|&diams;]]'''</span> 00:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1494 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1493 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-18 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.211098800E09 +++$+++ Right on.  +++$+++ ::Right on. [[User:Doc Strange| Doc Strange]]<sup>[[User talk:Doc Strange|Mailbox]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Doc Strange|Logbook]]</small> 01:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

263639 +++$+++ Ralphbk +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-17 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.153142940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the \"Welcome!\" message placed on my Talk page at 15:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC).  Very useful info therein.  However, it'd be nice to know what prompted you do add it.  Was there any particular Wiki rule or convention that you were hoping to draw my attention to?  +++$+++ Thanks for the "Welcome!" message placed on my Talk page at 15:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC).  Very useful info therein.  However, it'd be nice to know what prompted you do add it.  Was there any particular Wiki rule or convention that you were hoping to draw my attention to? [[User:Ralphbk|Ralphbk]] 06:29, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
263640 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263639 +++$+++ 263639 +++$+++ 2006-07-17 10:18:00 +++$+++ 1.153156680E09 +++$+++ Ah, so you can be paranoid too! :) Nope, you just edited a couple of articles on my watchlist (Lucy Porter, for one) and I noticed you hadn't had the message, so I thought I'd do the honours (as you say, it has some useful links). Keep up the good work.  +++$+++ :Ah, so you can be paranoid too! :) Nope, you just edited a couple of articles on my watchlist (Lucy Porter, for one) and I noticed you hadn't had the message, so I thought I'd do the honours (as you say, it has some useful links). Keep up the good work. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
263641 +++$+++ AnemoneProjectors +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263639 +++$+++ 263640 +++$+++ 2006-07-17 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.153157460E09 +++$+++ It's always nice to be welcomed :) --  +++$+++ ::It's always nice to be welcomed :) -- [[User:AnemoneProjectors|AnemoneProjectors]] ([[User talk:AnemoneProjectors|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
263642 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263639 +++$+++ 263640 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.153324800E09 +++$+++ Ridding the project from copyvio images, which could result in expensive legal battles and put the whole project at risk? You think that we should risk putting the work of thousands of editors to risk because of some image?  +++$+++ ::Ridding the project from copyvio images, which could result in expensive legal battles and put the whole project at risk? You think that we should risk putting the work of thousands of editors to risk because of some image? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
263643 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263639 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.153501620E09 +++$+++ If Wikipedia is causing you upset, then it is probably best to leave. If you were going to insist on making personal attacks and behaving in quite a vitriolic and immature fashion, then, yes, I am happy that you have left.  +++$+++ ::::If Wikipedia is causing you upset, then it is probably best to leave. If you were going to insist on making personal attacks and behaving in quite a vitriolic and immature fashion, then, yes, I am happy that you have left. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:07, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

525785 +++$+++ Eddie6705 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525785 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-20 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.195620720E09 +++$+++ No probs. I think some of the tournaments form last year may need to be changed to former tournaments and their articles updated.  +++$+++ No probs. I think some of the tournaments form last year may need to be changed to former tournaments and their articles updated. [[User:Eddie6705|Eddie6705]] ([[User talk:Eddie6705|talk]]) 20:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
525786 +++$+++ Eddie6705 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525785 +++$+++ 525785 +++$+++ 2007-11-23 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.195869240E09 +++$+++ Oops thanks for the warning  +++$+++ :Oops thanks for the warning [[User:Eddie6705|Eddie6705]] ([[User talk:Eddie6705|talk]]) 17:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
525787 +++$+++ Eddie6705 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525785 +++$+++ 525786 +++$+++ 2007-11-23 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.195869540E09 +++$+++ It looks very good from here. Do we know anything else about the qualifying for the tournament?  +++$+++ ::It looks very good from here. Do we know anything else about the qualifying for the tournament? [[User:Eddie6705|Eddie6705]] ([[User talk:Eddie6705|talk]]) 17:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
525788 +++$+++ Eddie6705 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525785 +++$+++ 525787 +++$+++ 2007-11-23 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.195870140E09 +++$+++ The summaries will help improve the article. Do you think it will be viable to create articles for previous editions?  +++$+++ :::The summaries will help improve the article. Do you think it will be viable to create articles for previous editions? [[User:Eddie6705|Eddie6705]] ([[User talk:Eddie6705|talk]]) 18:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

1499 +++$+++ S. Dean Jameson +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-12 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.215915480E09 +++$+++ In answer to your query posed in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_articles\/music\/Performers_and_bands&curid=8438448&diff=225256770&oldid=225193359 this] edit summary, you were exactly correct in how you removed the request after you wrote the article. [[Special:Contributions\/S._Dean_Jameson|S.]]  +++$+++ In answer to your query posed in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_articles/music/Performers_and_bands&curid=8438448&diff=225256770&oldid=225193359 this] edit summary, you were exactly correct in how you removed the request after you wrote the article. [[Special:Contributions/S._Dean_Jameson|S.]] [[User:S. Dean Jameson|Dean]] [[User_talk:S. Dean Jameson|Jameson]] 19:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
1500 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1499 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.215915660E09 +++$+++ OK thanks. I've been using Wikipedia since 2005, but this my first time creating an article off the requested articles page.  +++$+++ ::OK thanks. I've been using Wikipedia since 2005, but this my first time creating an article off the requested articles page. [[User:Doc Strange| Doc Strange]]<sup>[[User talk:Doc Strange|Mailbox]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Doc Strange|Logbook]]</small> 19:21, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

263644 +++$+++ AnemoneProjectors +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263644 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.153373100E09 +++$+++ Did you get my email? --  +++$+++ Did you get my email? -- [[User:AnemoneProjectors|AnemoneProjectors]] ([[User talk:AnemoneProjectors|talk]]) 22:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
263645 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263644 +++$+++ 263644 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 08:48:00 +++$+++ 1.153410480E09 +++$+++ Nope?  +++$+++ :Nope? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
263646 +++$+++ AnemoneProjectors +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263644 +++$+++ 263645 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.153421580E09 +++$+++ Oh :( --  +++$+++ ::Oh :( -- [[User:AnemoneProjectors|AnemoneProjectors]] ([[User talk:AnemoneProjectors|talk]]) 11:53, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
263647 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263644 +++$+++ 263646 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.153425660E09 +++$+++ Try again: I checked my spam folder and nothing there either...  +++$+++ :::Try again: I checked my spam folder and nothing there either... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

437157 +++$+++ Urshyam +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-11 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.142134980E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. [[User:Urshyam| <font color="black">'''Shyam'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Urshyam|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Urshyam|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 19:43, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
437158 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437157 +++$+++ 437157 +++$+++ 2006-03-13 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.142305020E09 +++$+++ Interesting that I am the \"original\" source on that photo which I simply took from Wikipedia (or Commons) and cropped\/rotated. I will look into it further. -  +++$+++ :Interesting that I am the "original" source on that photo which I simply took from Wikipedia (or Commons) and cropped/rotated. I will look into it further. - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 18:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

1504 +++$+++ Be Black Hole Sun +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1504 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-13 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.218645060E09 +++$+++ a-ha, your right, sorry okay. -- +++$+++ a-ha, your right, sorry okay. --[[User:Be Black Hole Sun|Be Black Hole Sun]] ([[User talk:Be Black Hole Sun|talk]]) 09:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
1505 +++$+++ Be Black Hole Sun +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1504 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-08-13 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.218661860E09 +++$+++ Here http:\/\/www.zobbel.de\/cluk\/CLUK_P.HTM, this site contains all chart information in the UK from the early 80s to 2006. -- +++$+++ ::Here http://www.zobbel.de/cluk/CLUK_P.HTM, this site contains all chart information in the UK from the early 80s to 2006. --[[User:Be Black Hole Sun|Be Black Hole Sun]] ([[User talk:Be Black Hole Sun|talk]]) 14:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

263650 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Would you really go as far to say that Basil is a misanthrope? I don't believe he actually hates the human race as a whole, just general types of people, he has affinities for certain types of people: Lord Melbury (until he finds out his real identity), the blonde australian woman, Mrs. Peignoir, doctors, certain types of politicians. I think that's a little extreme, but it wasn't me who reverted it as an IP: I saw that incident, and I kind of agree with him\/her. Anyway, talk to you soon Foxearth 09:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ Would you really go as far to say that Basil is a misanthrope? I don't believe he actually hates the human race as a whole, just general types of people, he has affinities for certain types of people: Lord Melbury (until he finds out his real identity), the blonde australian woman, Mrs. Peignoir, doctors, certain types of politicians. I think that's a little extreme, but it wasn't me who reverted it as an IP: I saw that incident, and I kind of agree with him/her. Anyway, talk to you soon Foxearth 09:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
263651 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263650 +++$+++ 263650 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.153589460E09 +++$+++ The IP wasn't reverting because they'd thought about it: they were going through my contributions and reverting me for the sake of reverting. The word has been used to descibe him in 35 papers I marked last month. I, however, don't care enough to argue\/think about this, so whatever. I will, though, leave a separate note on your talk page about fair use images.  +++$+++ :The IP wasn't reverting because they'd thought about it: they were going through my contributions and reverting me for the sake of reverting. The word has been used to descibe him in 35 papers I marked last month. I, however, don't care enough to argue/think about this, so whatever. I will, though, leave a separate note on your talk page about fair use images. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
263652 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263650 +++$+++ 263650 +++$+++ 2006-07-23 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.153695600E09 +++$+++ It was deleted by community consensus at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/The Widget]]. It was then speedily deleted under G4 (reposted content after previous deletion) and then again under a7 (not notable). I protected it to stop this article about a non notable podcast being recreated.  +++$+++ :It was deleted by community consensus at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Widget]]. It was then speedily deleted under G4 (reposted content after previous deletion) and then again under a7 (not notable). I protected it to stop this article about a non notable podcast being recreated. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

525796 +++$+++  +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525796 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-16 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.197849060E09 +++$+++ Since you have edited {{tl|Michigan Wolverines Football}}, I thought you might consider supporting [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/Lists of Michigan Wolverines football receiving leaders]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ Since you have edited {{tl|Michigan Wolverines Football}}, I thought you might consider supporting [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Lists of Michigan Wolverines football receiving leaders]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTD]]) </small> 15:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
525797 +++$+++  +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525796 +++$+++ 525796 +++$+++ 2007-12-16 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.197853620E09 +++$+++ Theoretically, the criteria are at [[WP:WIAFA]] or [[WP:WIAFL]], but in reality you may just look at it and say whether you believe it is some of the best of wikipedia.  Don't compare yourself to me.  I happen to have a few people with spades to grind based on their knowledge of me.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :Theoretically, the criteria are at [[WP:WIAFA]] or [[WP:WIAFL]], but in reality you may just look at it and say whether you believe it is some of the best of wikipedia.  Don't compare yourself to me.  I happen to have a few people with spades to grind based on their knowledge of me.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTD]]) </small> 17:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

263653 +++$+++ Foxearth +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-24 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.153757580E09 +++$+++ Sorry, to be honest I'm a novice to all this and I'm not deliberately trying to vandalise anything, I do apologize. I do agree with your nomination for deleting the infobox I created, it seems the logical thing to do. Thanks  +++$+++ Sorry, to be honest I'm a novice to all this and I'm not deliberately trying to vandalise anything, I do apologize. I do agree with your nomination for deleting the infobox I created, it seems the logical thing to do. Thanks [[User:Foxearth|Foxearth]] 09:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
263654 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263653 +++$+++ 263653 +++$+++ 2006-07-24 09:17:00 +++$+++ 1.153757820E09 +++$+++ That's OK -- I'm always keen to help people, but it becomes difficult to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] when you have told them the same thing three times! Now, you need to add a detailed fair use rationale for the images you have uploaded. I created [[User:The JPS\/FUR|this page]] specifically to help novices. All fair use images require it, especially if you use the \"Fair Use In\" tag.  +++$+++ :That's OK -- I'm always keen to help people, but it becomes difficult to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] when you have told them the same thing three times! Now, you need to add a detailed fair use rationale for the images you have uploaded. I created [[User:The JPS/FUR|this page]] specifically to help novices. All fair use images require it, especially if you use the "Fair Use In" tag. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
263655 +++$+++ Foxearth +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263653 +++$+++ 263653 +++$+++ 2006-07-24 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.153758840E09 +++$+++ Right well I've had a go at Fair Use for [[:Image:Fawltytowersmaincast.gif]]. Please reply so I know whether I'm on the right track, what needs to be done to improve, etc etc... Regards.  +++$+++ :Right well I've had a go at Fair Use for [[:Image:Fawltytowersmaincast.gif]]. Please reply so I know whether I'm on the right track, what needs to be done to improve, etc etc... Regards. [[User:Foxearth|Foxearth]] 09:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
263656 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263653 +++$+++ 263655 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.154014080E09 +++$+++ It's a good start. That image can't be used anyway because there's no source ''verifying'' that we can reproduce it.  +++$+++ ::It's a good start. That image can't be used anyway because there's no source ''verifying'' that we can reproduce it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

1511 +++$+++ Cannibaloki +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1511 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-03 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.223088540E09 +++$+++ Please stop adding useless information in this article, I am not asking for your help. You are depreciating my job! <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ Please stop adding useless information in this article, I am not asking for your help. You are depreciating my job! <font face="Impact">[[User:Cannibaloki|<font color="darkred">Canniba</font>]][[User talk:Cannibaloki|<font color="darkred">loki</font>]]</font> 19:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
1512 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1511 +++$+++ 1511 +++$+++ 2008-10-03 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.223088840E09 +++$+++ Yes, but i'm merely trying to add information on [[Mainstream Rock Tracks]] peaks for the rock group [[Iron Maiden (band)|Iron Maiden]].  +++$+++ :Yes, but i'm merely trying to add information on [[Mainstream Rock Tracks]] peaks for the rock group [[Iron Maiden (band)|Iron Maiden]]. [[User:Doc Strange| Doc Strange]]<sup>[[User talk:Doc Strange|Mailbox]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Doc Strange|Logbook]]</small> 19:54, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
1513 +++$+++ Cannibaloki +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1511 +++$+++ 1512 +++$+++ 2008-10-03 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.223090400E09 +++$+++ Hmm, but I will remove this column because is the \"most without peaks\" in comparison with others. And please, don't add again. Really don't need this. <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ ::Hmm, but I will remove this column because is the "most without peaks" in comparison with others. And please, don't add again. Really don't need this. <font face="Impact">[[User:Cannibaloki|<font color="darkred">Canniba</font>]][[User talk:Cannibaloki|<font color="darkred">loki</font>]]</font> 20:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

262396 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262396 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-26 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.296114180E09 +++$+++ What amazes me is the notion that a GA is too short!  Mine usually were criticized for being too LONG!  Is this \"derail all efforts and discourage everyone who does real work on wikipedia\" week or something?  Sheesh!  Bulk for the sake of bulk is silly.  This was a lovely little article.   +++$+++ What amazes me is the notion that a GA is too short!  Mine usually were criticized for being too LONG!  Is this "derail all efforts and discourage everyone who does real work on wikipedia" week or something?  Sheesh!  Bulk for the sake of bulk is silly.  This was a lovely little article.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 23:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
262397 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262396 +++$+++ 262396 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.296116340E09 +++$+++ No different from any other week as far as I'm concerned. Wikipedia seems to have been deliberately engineered to be the most demotivating of environments.  +++$+++ :No different from any other week as far as I'm concerned. Wikipedia seems to have been deliberately engineered to be the most demotivating of environments. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 00:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

263659 +++$+++ Gungadin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-25 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.153856700E09 +++$+++ Hi JPS, can I get your advice on something? Several of the images I have uploaded have been tagged by a user for not providing a source, such as [[:Image:Nikki Ziering Cli.jpg]]. That one is orphaned anyway so it makes no difference to me if it's deleted, but I don't understand how I can provide a source for a screenshot that has been taken from my own PC. I have already stated on the description page that it has been taken from the television show etc. and I thought that that was the source. I have not had to provide a URL for such images in the past, none exist anyway. Is this user incorrect for tagging it, or should I be providing something else? thanks  +++$+++ Hi JPS, can I get your advice on something? Several of the images I have uploaded have been tagged by a user for not providing a source, such as [[:Image:Nikki Ziering Cli.jpg]]. That one is orphaned anyway so it makes no difference to me if it's deleted, but I don't understand how I can provide a source for a screenshot that has been taken from my own PC. I have already stated on the description page that it has been taken from the television show etc. and I thought that that was the source. I have not had to provide a URL for such images in the past, none exist anyway. Is this user incorrect for tagging it, or should I be providing something else? thanks [[User:Gungadin|Gungadin]] 12:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
263660 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263659 +++$+++ 263659 +++$+++ 2006-07-25 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.153857120E09 +++$+++ You're right -- you used the correct tag, and the your stated source would have been sufficient.  +++$+++ :You're right -- you used the correct tag, and the your stated source would have been sufficient. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

263661 +++$+++ Digresser +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263661 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-26 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.153919520E09 +++$+++ Hi JPS, I have the same problem as Gungadin, I think. For my image, [[:Image:Bensonnbc.jpg]], I gave the copyright notice, as well as the URL where I found the picture, and yet you've tagged it. Have I missed something? Thanks! - +++$+++ Hi JPS, I have the same problem as Gungadin, I think. For my image, [[:Image:Bensonnbc.jpg]], I gave the copyright notice, as well as the URL where I found the picture, and yet you've tagged it. Have I missed something? Thanks! -[[User:Digresser|Digresser]] 06:12, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
263662 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263661 +++$+++ 263661 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.154013780E09 +++$+++ Oh, I see you put the source in the edit summary (which I didn't spot -- sorry), but you didn't put it on the image description page, and you didn't provide a fair use rationale!! Trouble is, where is the evidence that it can be reused? The copyright status needs to be verifiable. For this reason, so called \"promotional\" images need to come from a section of a website clearly labelled '[[press kit]]'. Otherwise, just about anything can be slapped 'promo'!  +++$+++ :Oh, I see you put the source in the edit summary (which I didn't spot -- sorry), but you didn't put it on the image description page, and you didn't provide a fair use rationale!! Trouble is, where is the evidence that it can be reused? The copyright status needs to be verifiable. For this reason, so called "promotional" images need to come from a section of a website clearly labelled '[[press kit]]'. Otherwise, just about anything can be slapped 'promo'! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

263663 +++$+++ Yoyoceramic +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263663 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-26 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.153972140E09 +++$+++ Hi, I am terribly sorry about that.  This is a screenshot I took from that episode.  I am unfamiliar how to document that.  Perhaps you can help me out. -- +++$+++ Hi, I am terribly sorry about that.  This is a screenshot I took from that episode.  I am unfamiliar how to document that.  Perhaps you can help me out. --[[User:Yoyoceramic|Yoyoceramic]] 20:49, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
263664 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263663 +++$+++ 263663 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.154013960E09 +++$+++ I've added the source, but a fair use rationale is needed for every article in which it is used.  +++$+++ :I've added the source, but a fair use rationale is needed for every article in which it is used. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

1520 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1520 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-12 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.242130740E09 +++$+++ Very confused why you added Newport and Warwick to the cities line of {{tl|Providence County, Rhode Island}} \u2014 they're not in Providence County.   +++$+++ Very confused why you added Newport and Warwick to the cities line of {{tl|Providence County, Rhode Island}} — they're not in Providence County.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 05:19, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
1521 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1520 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-12 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.242171420E09 +++$+++ It was an oops moment. Mentioned this on your talk page.  +++$+++ :: It was an oops moment. Mentioned this on your talk page. [[User:Doc Strange| Doc Strange]]<sup>[[User talk:Doc Strange|Mailbox]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Doc Strange|Logbook]]</small> 16:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

263665 +++$+++ Feydey +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263665 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-26 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.153975620E09 +++$+++ P.S. ''This page is 50 kilobytes long'' - time to archive? Best,  +++$+++ P.S. ''This page is 50 kilobytes long'' - time to archive? Best, [[User:Feydey|feydey]] 21:47, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
263666 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263665 +++$+++ 263665 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.154013600E09 +++$+++ If it is a genuine screenshot, those huge watermarks make it llok pretty unproffessional for us to use. It looks a little posed to be a screenshot, yet it seems to be the right aspect ratio. The two characters seem to be stuck onto a new background (the edges of their bodies is a bit unnatural). Let's see if they die naturally (orphan, no source...) -- if not, we'll go for them -- [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]] seems the most obvious route.  +++$+++ :If it is a genuine screenshot, those huge watermarks make it llok pretty unproffessional for us to use. It looks a little posed to be a screenshot, yet it seems to be the right aspect ratio. The two characters seem to be stuck onto a new background (the edges of their bodies is a bit unnatural). Let's see if they die naturally (orphan, no source...) -- if not, we'll go for them -- [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]] seems the most obvious route. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

263667 +++$+++ Mr Stephen +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263667 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-27 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.154048220E09 +++$+++ I am not a lawyer, but no, I don't think that changing \"I\" to \"he\" is enough to avoid a copyvio.  Regards  +++$+++ I am not a lawyer, but no, I don't think that changing "I" to "he" is enough to avoid a copyvio.  Regards [[User:Mr Stephen|Mr Stephen]] 17:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
263668 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263667 +++$+++ 263667 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.154061240E09 +++$+++ I see there's a similar case about that water company.  +++$+++ :I see there's a similar case about that water company. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

1524 +++$+++ Krazycev13 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1524 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-07 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.257648840E09 +++$+++ Hey Doc. I was looking over [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Artist Vs Poet|this page]] and noticed you made a comment without [[WP:SIG|signing it]]. I have signed it thanks to the revision history of the article, but please remember to sign your comments with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>), for I am not [[User:SineBot|SineBot]]. Thank you. --''' +++$+++ Hey Doc. I was looking over [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artist Vs Poet|this page]] and noticed you made a comment without [[WP:SIG|signing it]]. I have signed it thanks to the revision history of the article, but please remember to sign your comments with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>), for I am not [[User:SineBot|SineBot]]. Thank you. --'''[[User:Krazycev13|<span style="font-family: Tempus Sans ITC;color: #000000">ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV</span>]]''' '''[[User talk:Krazycev13|<font color="#1589FF">13</font>]]''' <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Krazycev13|<font color="#D98500">other crap</font>]]</sup> 18:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
1525 +++$+++ Krazycev13 +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1524 +++$+++ 1524 +++$+++ 2009-11-07 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.257649140E09 +++$+++ No problem: I've run in to several people who don't sign their comments, and wasn't positive you knew how. Don't take it personally, that was my only form of judgement haha. --''' +++$+++ :No problem: I've run in to several people who don't sign their comments, and wasn't positive you knew how. Don't take it personally, that was my only form of judgement haha. --'''[[User:Krazycev13|<span style="font-family: Tempus Sans ITC;color: #000000">ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV</span>]]''' '''[[User talk:Krazycev13|<font color="#1589FF">13</font>]]''' <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Krazycev13|<font color="#D98500">other crap</font>]]</sup> 18:59, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

263669 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-28 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.154117340E09 +++$+++ Please dont re add your dispute tag, if you read the fair use tag there is no fair use promo tag anymore. <font face=\"Tahoma\" size=\"1\"><font color=\"#C11B17\">Matthew<\/font> <b><font color=\"#3366ff\"> +++$+++ Please dont re add your dispute tag, if you read the fair use tag there is no fair use promo tag anymore. <font face="Tahoma" size="1"><font color="#C11B17">Matthew</font> <b><font color="#3366ff">[[User_talk:MatthewFenton|Fenton]] (</font></b><font color="#356468">[[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|contribs]]</font><font color="#3366ff"><b>)</b></font></font> 13:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263670 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263669 +++$+++ 263669 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.154119980E09 +++$+++ The fair use tag is not a get out of jail free card. I am perfectly entitled to dispute the fair use status of the image, particulrly since the source is dodgy. I'm going to re-add it, and eventually a third party will assess it. I might also take it to PUI.  +++$+++ :The fair use tag is not a get out of jail free card. I am perfectly entitled to dispute the fair use status of the image, particulrly since the source is dodgy. I'm going to re-add it, and eventually a third party will assess it. I might also take it to PUI. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263671 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263669 +++$+++ 263669 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.154120700E09 +++$+++ How is the source dodgy, explain? Impolite, explain? My message was pretty self-explantory your claims can not be held up. Also pelase read the page, there is no promo claim. <font face=\"Tahoma\" size=\"1\"><font color=\"#C11B17\">Matthew<\/font> <b><font color=\"#3366ff\"> +++$+++ :How is the source dodgy, explain? Impolite, explain? My message was pretty self-explantory your claims can not be held up. Also pelase read the page, there is no promo claim. <font face="Tahoma" size="1"><font color="#C11B17">Matthew</font> <b><font color="#3366ff">[[User_talk:MatthewFenton|Fenton]] (</font></b><font color="#356468">[[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|contribs]]</font><font color="#3366ff"><b>)</b></font></font> 14:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263672 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263669 +++$+++ 263671 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.154120880E09 +++$+++ Which fair use critieria do you feel this image satisfies? Because your rationale does not explicitly address the criteria. Your general tone was impolite (e.g. the directive \"Read tags\").  +++$+++ ::Which fair use critieria do you feel this image satisfies? Because your rationale does not explicitly address the criteria. Your general tone was impolite (e.g. the directive "Read tags"). [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263673 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263669 +++$+++ 263672 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.154121120E09 +++$+++ Haha, and how else would you like me to put it? <font face=\"Tahoma\" size=\"1\"><font color=\"#C11B17\">Matthew<\/font> <b><font color=\"#3366ff\"> +++$+++ :::Haha, and how else would you like me to put it? <font face="Tahoma" size="1"><font color="#C11B17">Matthew</font> <b><font color="#3366ff">[[User_talk:MatthewFenton|Fenton]] (</font></b><font color="#356468">[[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|contribs]]</font><font color="#3366ff"><b>)</b></font></font> 14:12, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263674 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263669 +++$+++ 263672 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.154121000E09 +++$+++ Please stop removing that dispute tag. It should only be removed by a third party.  +++$+++ :::Please stop removing that dispute tag. It should only be removed by a third party. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

1531 +++$+++ Frazzydee +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-03 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.270348980E09 +++$+++ As far as I can tell, the review from \"Pitchfork Media\" was also vandalism, so I removed it. - +++$+++ As far as I can tell, the review from "Pitchfork Media" was also vandalism, so I removed it. -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee]]|[[User talk:Frazzydee|&#9997;]] 19:43, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
1532 +++$+++ Frazzydee +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1531 +++$+++ 1531 +++$+++ 2010-04-03 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.270352760E09 +++$+++ Good call! http:\/\/boards.4chan.org\/mu\/res\/8595628 - +++$+++ : Good call! http://boards.4chan.org/mu/res/8595628 -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee]]|[[User talk:Frazzydee|&#9997;]] 20:46, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
1533 +++$+++ Frazzydee +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1531 +++$+++ 1532 +++$+++ 2010-04-03 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.270354620E09 +++$+++ Update: I blocked a bunch of them, and they seem to have gotten bored. - +++$+++ :: Update: I blocked a bunch of them, and they seem to have gotten bored. -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee]]|[[User talk:Frazzydee|&#9997;]] 21:17, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
1534 +++$+++ Frazzydee +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1531 +++$+++ 1533 +++$+++ 2010-04-03 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.270356960E09 +++$+++ Not really a big deal, IMO.  Doesn't take much to be an internet tough guy.  The problem resolved pretty fast after you directed me to the thread and I blocked every user who vandalized a page posted there.  The three-strikes-before-you're-blocked rule is good for encouraging newbies, but pointless for organized vandalism.  I think the best way is to make it not fun, and it's not fun if you can only edit once per IP before you get blocked.  - +++$+++ ::: Not really a big deal, IMO.  Doesn't take much to be an internet tough guy.  The problem resolved pretty fast after you directed me to the thread and I blocked every user who vandalized a page posted there.  The three-strikes-before-you're-blocked rule is good for encouraging newbies, but pointless for organized vandalism.  I think the best way is to make it not fun, and it's not fun if you can only edit once per IP before you get blocked.  -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee]]|[[User talk:Frazzydee|&#9997;]] 21:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
1535 +++$+++ Frazzydee +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1531 +++$+++ 1534 +++$+++ 2010-04-04 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.270440600E09 +++$+++ Doing it again? Where? - +++$+++ ::::Doing it again? Where? -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee]]|[[User talk:Frazzydee|&#9997;]] 21:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
1536 +++$+++ Frazzydee +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1531 +++$+++ 1535 +++$+++ 2010-04-04 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.270440960E09 +++$+++ Oh, yeah there was another thread on \/mu\/ this morning.  Don't worry, they stopped.  They might start again when the page gets unprotected...seem to have something against that band.  Thanks for the heads up :) - +++$+++ :::::Oh, yeah there was another thread on /mu/ this morning.  Don't worry, they stopped.  They might start again when the page gets unprotected...seem to have something against that band.  Thanks for the heads up :) -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee]]|[[User talk:Frazzydee|&#9997;]] 21:16, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

263676 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-28 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.154122560E09 +++$+++ I followed the correct procedure, i tagged them & notified you. Feel free to report me but i have not done anything wrong. Also how is it [[WP:POINT]], i saw one of your images lacked source so started checking the rest.. no point there. <font face=\"Tahoma\" size=\"1\"><font color=\"#C11B17\">Matthew<\/font> <b><font color=\"#3366ff\"> +++$+++ I followed the correct procedure, i tagged them & notified you. Feel free to report me but i have not done anything wrong. Also how is it [[WP:POINT]], i saw one of your images lacked source so started checking the rest.. no point there. <font face="Tahoma" size="1"><font color="#C11B17">Matthew</font> <b><font color="#3366ff">[[User_talk:MatthewFenton|Fenton]] (</font></b><font color="#356468">[[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|contribs]]</font><font color="#3366ff"><b>)</b></font></font> 14:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263677 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263676 +++$+++ 263676 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.154122620E09 +++$+++ It is regrettable that you have chosen to turn this into a personal battle. All of my images are correctly sourced.  +++$+++ :It is regrettable that you have chosen to turn this into a personal battle. All of my images are correctly sourced. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:37, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263678 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263676 +++$+++ 263676 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.154122800E09 +++$+++ No they are not. Example:[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Joking_Apart_-_opening_title.jpg] some dont even have fairuse ratioanles. <font face=\"Tahoma\" size=\"1\"><font color=\"#C11B17\">Matthew<\/font> <b><font color=\"#3366ff\"> +++$+++ :No they are not. Example:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Joking_Apart_-_opening_title.jpg] some dont even have fairuse ratioanles. <font face="Tahoma" size="1"><font color="#C11B17">Matthew</font> <b><font color="#3366ff">[[User_talk:MatthewFenton|Fenton]] (</font></b><font color="#356468">[[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|contribs]]</font><font color="#3366ff"><b>)</b></font></font> 14:40, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263679 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263676 +++$+++ 263678 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.154123280E09 +++$+++ Yes, you are correct that I haven't added rationale to my earlier images. \"Opening titles to ''Joking Apart''\" is the source. With the screenshot tag, the source is plainly the opening titles of the television show ''Joking Apart''.  +++$+++ ::Yes, you are correct that I haven't added rationale to my earlier images. "Opening titles to ''Joking Apart''" is the source. With the screenshot tag, the source is plainly the opening titles of the television show ''Joking Apart''. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263680 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263676 +++$+++ 263676 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.154123700E09 +++$+++ Source info states where you got it from! IE: Did you cap it your self? If the answer i yes, then you are the source so a summary would be: Source: Image taken by me ( +++$+++ :Source info states where you got it from! IE: Did you cap it your self? If the answer i yes, then you are the source so a summary would be: Source: Image taken by me ([[User:example]]) <font face="Tahoma" size="1"><font color="#C11B17">Matthew</font> <b><font color="#3366ff">[[User_talk:MatthewFenton|Fenton]] (</font></b><font color="#356468">[[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|contribs]]</font><font color="#3366ff"><b>)</b></font></font> 14:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263681 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263676 +++$+++ 263680 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.154123820E09 +++$+++ Not at all. It is completely irrelevant who captured the file.  +++$+++ ::Not at all. It is completely irrelevant who captured the file. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

43946 +++$+++ FreeRangeFrog +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 43946 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-03 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.236143520E09 +++$+++ Thank you for putting up that quote and a link to the Wired article on your user page. It's been a while since I've laughed so much. As they say, it's funny because it's true :) <span style=\"color:dimgray; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;\">\xa7 +++$+++ Thank you for putting up that quote and a link to the Wired article on your user page. It's been a while since I've laughed so much. As they say, it's funny because it's true :) <span style="color:dimgray; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§[[User:FreeRangeFrog|<span style="color:#007138">FreeRangeFrog</span>]]</span> 21:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
43947 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 43946 +++$+++ 43946 +++$+++ 2009-03-04 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.236209160E09 +++$+++ Yeah, once I saw that one I knew I had to include it. +++$+++ :Yeah, once I saw that one I knew I had to include it.[[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] ([[User talk:DreamGuy#top|talk]]) 15:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

525823 +++$+++  +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525823 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-05 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.217949960E09 +++$+++ Do you understand the code for infobox jerseys and know the details of the Michigan color schemes.  I have just started [[Michigan Wolverines men's basketball]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ Do you understand the code for infobox jerseys and know the details of the Michigan color schemes.  I have just started [[Michigan Wolverines men's basketball]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 08:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
525824 +++$+++  +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525823 +++$+++ 525823 +++$+++ 2008-08-05 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.217996400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the support.  I hope to clean it up prior to a DYK run this weekend.  If I get a chance I will add a lot of text.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :Thanks for the support.  I hope to clean it up prior to a DYK run this weekend.  If I get a chance I will add a lot of text.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 21:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

1539 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1539 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-18 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.274242140E09 +++$+++ Hello Doc Strange. Thanks for adding columns to the BBC America\u200e programming section. I doubt that the section would need three columns for now. It might have back in the late 90's and early 00's when they had more programs on each week - boy I miss those days. Between you me and a couple of anon IP's I think there are enough eyes keeping things up to date that the section won't fill up with items that aren't currently on. Having said that should things change in the future I know that you will be there to take care of things. Thanks again and happy editing.  +++$+++ Hello Doc Strange. Thanks for adding columns to the BBC America‎ programming section. I doubt that the section would need three columns for now. It might have back in the late 90's and early 00's when they had more programs on each week - boy I miss those days. Between you me and a couple of anon IP's I think there are enough eyes keeping things up to date that the section won't fill up with items that aren't currently on. Having said that should things change in the future I know that you will be there to take care of things. Thanks again and happy editing. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 21:09, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
1540 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Doc Strange +++$+++ 1539 +++$+++ 1539 +++$+++ 2010-05-18 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.274244660E09 +++$+++ Hi again. Thanks for your note. Yeah, listing past programs doesn't add much to the article. Most other articles about television channels do not have them and that is part of the reason that I edited them out - I appreciate your understanding on that. I noticed that you added some upcoming programs. At first glance these have some problems with [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. You have taken care of some of that by providing proper references and dates. However, we still have to be careful about this. Those that work for this network can change there minds. As I remember it the 2nd season of ''Life on Mars'' (one of the best things of the mid 00's by the way) was announced and then got pushed several months away from that date (I think that the popularity of ''Torchwood'' had something to do with that but I could be wrong). I will rely on you to check on them from time to time and if something changes please update the page. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Hi again. Thanks for your note. Yeah, listing past programs doesn't add much to the article. Most other articles about television channels do not have them and that is part of the reason that I edited them out - I appreciate your understanding on that. I noticed that you added some upcoming programs. At first glance these have some problems with [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. You have taken care of some of that by providing proper references and dates. However, we still have to be careful about this. Those that work for this network can change there minds. As I remember it the 2nd season of ''Life on Mars'' (one of the best things of the mid 00's by the way) was announced and then got pushed several months away from that date (I think that the popularity of ''Torchwood'' had something to do with that but I could be wrong). I will rely on you to check on them from time to time and if something changes please update the page. Cheers. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 21:51, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

263686 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-28 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.154125380E09 +++$+++ An example of what I would pick on is [[:Image:OPPERA.jpg]]. There's no verifiable source information at all (see how the tag says that it is \"known to come from a press kit\"). It is this last point that I would challenge other images, but usually if nsd is removed.  +++$+++ An example of what I would pick on is [[:Image:OPPERA.jpg]]. There's no verifiable source information at all (see how the tag says that it is "known to come from a press kit"). It is this last point that I would challenge other images, but usually if nsd is removed. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263687 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263686 +++$+++ 263686 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.154125740E09 +++$+++ I've just nominated there article for deletion as notability isnt justified in the article, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Oppera] <font face=\"Tahoma\" size=\"1\"><font color=\"#C11B17\">Matthew<\/font> <b><font color=\"#3366ff\"> +++$+++ :I've just nominated there article for deletion as notability isnt justified in the article, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Oppera] <font face="Tahoma" size="1"><font color="#C11B17">Matthew</font> <b><font color="#3366ff">[[User_talk:MatthewFenton|Fenton]] (</font></b><font color="#356468">[[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|contribs]]</font><font color="#3366ff"><b>)</b></font></font> 15:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

525831 +++$+++ C45207 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525831 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-01 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.246444920E09 +++$+++ On a related note, I've seen a lot of articles about individual yearly instances of a given tournament  (across many different sports) with the same issue (like [[Serie B 2009\u201310]], where I brought up the same issue). Is there a style guide for these sort of articles I'm unaware of? Thanks.&mdash; +++$+++ On a related note, I've seen a lot of articles about individual yearly instances of a given tournament  (across many different sports) with the same issue (like [[Serie B 2009–10]], where I brought up the same issue). Is there a style guide for these sort of articles I'm unaware of? Thanks.&mdash;[[User:C45207|C45207]] | [[User_talk:C45207|Talk]] 03:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
525832 +++$+++ C45207 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525831 +++$+++ 525831 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.246534260E09 +++$+++ I've taken another stab at it [{{fullurl:2006_WGC-American_Express_Championship|diff=299827678&oldid=299625864}}]. I think that this gives more context without being over-saturated. Thoughts? Is the \"one of three\" bit correct?&mdash; +++$+++ :I've taken another stab at it [{{fullurl:2006_WGC-American_Express_Championship|diff=299827678&oldid=299625864}}]. I think that this gives more context without being over-saturated. Thoughts? Is the "one of three" bit correct?&mdash;[[User:C45207|C45207]] | [[User_talk:C45207|Talk]] 04:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

263689 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-28 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.154134560E09 +++$+++ For the Kirsten image that one can be deleted as there was already an image of her here in use so that one has been replaced. <font face=\"Tahoma\" size=\"1\"><font color=\"#C11B17\">Matthew<\/font> <b><font color=\"#3366ff\"> +++$+++ For the Kirsten image that one can be deleted as there was already an image of her here in use so that one has been replaced. <font face="Tahoma" size="1"><font color="#C11B17">Matthew</font> <b><font color="#3366ff">[[User_talk:MatthewFenton|Fenton]] (</font></b><font color="#356468">[[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|contribs]]</font><font color="#3366ff"><b>)</b></font></font> 17:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263690 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263689 +++$+++ 263689 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.154137620E09 +++$+++ All the screencaps now have FURs, I have also uploaded a new version of the Theresa picture and replaced a screencap. <font face=\"Tahoma\" size=\"1\"><font color=\"#C11B17\">Matthew<\/font> <b><font color=\"#3366ff\"> +++$+++ :All the screencaps now have FURs, I have also uploaded a new version of the Theresa picture and replaced a screencap. <font face="Tahoma" size="1"><font color="#C11B17">Matthew</font> <b><font color="#3366ff">[[User_talk:MatthewFenton|Fenton]] (</font></b><font color="#356468">[[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|contribs]]</font><font color="#3366ff"><b>)</b></font></font> 18:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263691 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263689 +++$+++ 263689 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.154380080E09 +++$+++ That sentence has been discussed several times over the last month and community consensus is to keep it. See the article's talk page. You can do what other anonymous users have done and write essays on my talk page, filled with abuse amd inaccurate guesses about my politics, but I will just laugh at them.  +++$+++ :That sentence has been discussed several times over the last month and community consensus is to keep it. See the article's talk page. You can do what other anonymous users have done and write essays on my talk page, filled with abuse amd inaccurate guesses about my politics, but I will just laugh at them. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
263692 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263689 +++$+++ 263689 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.154389980E09 +++$+++ You're welcome -- don't foget to sign your messages... you can use <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>. :)  +++$+++ :You're welcome -- don't foget to sign your messages... you can use <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. :) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

584897 +++$+++ Fritzpoll +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584897 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.203213900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for doing this - obviously managed to miss you doing it before I posted up the request! -  +++$+++ Thanks for doing this - obviously managed to miss you doing it before I posted up the request! - [[User:Fritzpoll|Fritzpoll]] ([[User talk:Fritzpoll|talk]]) 18:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
584898 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584897 +++$+++ 584897 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.203213960E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! After a review of the recent history, it seemed that every edit being made to the page was either vandalism or a revert.  +++$+++ :You're welcome! After a review of the recent history, it seemed that every edit being made to the page was either vandalism or a revert. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

480855 +++$+++ Petros471 +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-04 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.152033720E09 +++$+++ I've emailed them to you so you can do your spamming. Thanks for signing up to do that! Cheers,  +++$+++ I've emailed them to you so you can do your spamming. Thanks for signing up to do that! Cheers, [[User:Petros471|Petros471]] 10:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
480856 +++$+++ Petros471 +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480855 +++$+++ 480855 +++$+++ 2006-07-04 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.152041400E09 +++$+++ No I didn't forget, I thought you'd better have them first. If you want I can post them now.  +++$+++ : No I didn't forget, I thought you'd better have them first. If you want I can post them now. [[User:Petros471|Petros471]] 12:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
480857 +++$+++ Petros471 +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480855 +++$+++ 480856 +++$+++ 2006-07-04 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.152042000E09 +++$+++ I've put the results on the main page, and given Fir0002 the award, so you just need to do the runner up template spamming. Thanks,  +++$+++ :: I've put the results on the main page, and given Fir0002 the award, so you just need to do the runner up template spamming. Thanks, [[User:Petros471|Petros471]] 12:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
480858 +++$+++ Petros471 +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480855 +++$+++ 480857 +++$+++ 2006-07-04 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.152042420E09 +++$+++ Looks like 1 is username, 2 is link to winning userpage (the perminant link) and 3 is your 4~ sig so it shows up inside the template. Might be wrong though, I didn't make it!  +++$+++ ::: Looks like 1 is username, 2 is link to winning userpage (the perminant link) and 3 is your 4~ sig so it shows up inside the template. Might be wrong though, I didn't make it! [[User:Petros471|Petros471]] 12:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

263693 +++$+++ Seb Patrick +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263693 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-02 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.154545680E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, and it may be something that you're already aware of, but you seem to have a... well... I don't know what the term for it is, really. An \"edit stalker\", perhaps? Anyway, [[User:JackRuby|JackRuby]] is their name, and [[Special:Contributions\/JackRuby|here's their contributions]], which as you can see consist of nothing more than reverting your edits and saying \"reverting vandalism by TheJPS\". Don't know if it's a new account from someone who's already got some beef with you or what, but they seem intent on making unnecessary edits to various British comedy-related articles, which brought them to my attention. Just thought I'd give you a heads-up.  +++$+++ Just to let you know, and it may be something that you're already aware of, but you seem to have a... well... I don't know what the term for it is, really. An "edit stalker", perhaps? Anyway, [[User:JackRuby|JackRuby]] is their name, and [[Special:Contributions/JackRuby|here's their contributions]], which as you can see consist of nothing more than reverting your edits and saying "reverting vandalism by TheJPS". Don't know if it's a new account from someone who's already got some beef with you or what, but they seem intent on making unnecessary edits to various British comedy-related articles, which brought them to my attention. Just thought I'd give you a heads-up. [[User:Seb Patrick|Seb Patrick]] 12:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
263694 +++$+++ Seb Patrick +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263693 +++$+++ 263693 +++$+++ 2006-08-02 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.154545740E09 +++$+++ Ah, never mind. Just as I post that, I see that you've been dealing with them. Oh well!  +++$+++ :Ah, never mind. Just as I post that, I see that you've been dealing with them. Oh well! [[User:Seb Patrick|Seb Patrick]] 12:09, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
263695 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263693 +++$+++ 263694 +++$+++ 2006-08-02 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.154545920E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I get them from time to time. Often kids who don't like me tagging their unsourced images for deletion. Cheers anyway.  +++$+++ ::Yeah, I get them from time to time. Often kids who don't like me tagging their unsourced images for deletion. Cheers anyway. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
263696 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263693 +++$+++ 263693 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.154629140E09 +++$+++ My reasons for deletion is clear at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Abc1uk.co.uk]]. It fails our notability guidelines.  +++$+++ :My reasons for deletion is clear at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abc1uk.co.uk]]. It fails our notability guidelines. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
263697 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263693 +++$+++ 263696 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.154646000E09 +++$+++ Nope. Take a look at [[WP:WEB]]. at present your article fails all three criteria. www.j-one.co.uk does not appear to be \"independent of the site itself.\" See also note 4 on that page about self promotion. Many site owners want articles on Wikipedia simply to increase its visibility and increase Google ranks, rather than if it is of any encylopaedic value.  +++$+++ ::Nope. Take a look at [[WP:WEB]]. at present your article fails all three criteria. www.j-one.co.uk does not appear to be "independent of the site itself." See also note 4 on that page about self promotion. Many site owners want articles on Wikipedia simply to increase its visibility and increase Google ranks, rather than if it is of any encylopaedic value. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
263698 +++$+++ GarryMc +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263693 +++$+++ 263693 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.154647440E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:GarryMc|GarryMc]] 16:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

525840 +++$+++ pfctdayelise +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525840 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-23 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.130110380E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Pfctdayelise|pfctdayelise]] 16:33, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
525841 +++$+++ Evervans +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525840 +++$+++ 525840 +++$+++ 2005-10-24 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.130195400E09 +++$+++ Not trying to steal the spotlight, but I threw up the Big Heavy Stuff page - I want to thank ERcheck for cleaning it up though! That, and apologise for not doing a very thorough job, I figured no one would even notice and that I could get back to edit it later on when I have a little more time :)-- +++$+++ :Not trying to steal the spotlight, but I threw up the Big Heavy Stuff page - I want to thank ERcheck for cleaning it up though! That, and apologise for not doing a very thorough job, I figured no one would even notice and that I could get back to edit it later on when I have a little more time :)--[[User:Evervans|Evervans]] 16:10, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

1553 +++$+++ Feedback +++$+++ Jtalledo +++$+++ 1553 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-02 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.294002660E09 +++$+++ Start whatever fucking thread you want. I've been down this road before with people who don't understand guidelines and community consensus. Go to WT:PW archives, you'll see the move to Kaval was discussed, handled and voted for. A move to Brandon Silvestry is so against policy ([[WP:STAGENAME]]) that there is no way something like that would pass. That's why I wrote in the thread above that a move to \"[[Low Ki]]\" should be discussed instead. And [[WP:SNOW]] has been used to close discussions MILLIONS of times on Wikipedia. But you know what, I love that you posted on my talk page. Go start a User conduct thread. Right now. Do it. I'd love to see how that goes. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ Start whatever fucking thread you want. I've been down this road before with people who don't understand guidelines and community consensus. Go to WT:PW archives, you'll see the move to Kaval was discussed, handled and voted for. A move to Brandon Silvestry is so against policy ([[WP:STAGENAME]]) that there is no way something like that would pass. That's why I wrote in the thread above that a move to "[[Low Ki]]" should be discussed instead. And [[WP:SNOW]] has been used to close discussions MILLIONS of times on Wikipedia. But you know what, I love that you posted on my talk page. Go start a User conduct thread. Right now. Do it. I'd love to see how that goes. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User:Feedback|<big><font color="#039">'''''Feed'''''</big>]][[Special:Contributions/Feedback|<big><font color="#008000">'''''back'''''</big>]] <big><sup>[[User talk:Feedback|'''☎''']]</sup></big></span> 13:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
1554 +++$+++ Feedback +++$+++ Jtalledo +++$+++ 1553 +++$+++ 1553 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.294003560E09 +++$+++ Don't recall, but there's a search tool on the WT:PW page that you could use. What I remember was that someone brought up a move from Bryan Danielson and then he started bringing up other people like Wade Barrett. I said we should wait on moving them all until they had more exposure on TV... until I noticed Kaval was at \"Brandon Silvestry\" and I said that was completely unacceptable. When I wanted to discuss it, other editors chimed in and said to move them enacting [[WP:BOLD]] because the move was uncontroversial (it obviously needed to be done). It was obvious because there is no such thing as [[WP:BIRTHNAME]]. Birth names do not have any preference over common names ([[WP:COMMONNAME]]) and stage names ([[WP:STAGENAME]]). Kaval or Low Ki is the correct location for the article. Let the community decide that. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ :Don't recall, but there's a search tool on the WT:PW page that you could use. What I remember was that someone brought up a move from Bryan Danielson and then he started bringing up other people like Wade Barrett. I said we should wait on moving them all until they had more exposure on TV... until I noticed Kaval was at "Brandon Silvestry" and I said that was completely unacceptable. When I wanted to discuss it, other editors chimed in and said to move them enacting [[WP:BOLD]] because the move was uncontroversial (it obviously needed to be done). It was obvious because there is no such thing as [[WP:BIRTHNAME]]. Birth names do not have any preference over common names ([[WP:COMMONNAME]]) and stage names ([[WP:STAGENAME]]). Kaval or Low Ki is the correct location for the article. Let the community decide that. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User:Feedback|<big><font color="#039">'''''Feed'''''</big>]][[Special:Contributions/Feedback|<big><font color="#008000">'''''back'''''</big>]] <big><sup>[[User talk:Feedback|'''☎''']]</sup></big></span> 13:26, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
1555 +++$+++ Feedback +++$+++ Jtalledo +++$+++ 1553 +++$+++ 1554 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.294014000E09 +++$+++ That's okay, I have nothing against you either. What does upset me is people opening pointless move discussions without knowing (or understanding) the guidelines. [[WP:COMMONNAME]] isn't that hard to understand, but some users like Pedigree, NascarKing and others just love to open pointless move discussions (See: [[Talk:Mr. Kennedy#Request Move]] for an example of a long move discussion that was completely pointless). These discussions are counterproductive as they waste people's time instead of improving articles. Instead of focusing on article titles, people should be EDITING THE ARTICLES. An article like Kaval's needs copyediting, better images, reliable sourcing, etc. Instead of that attention, it gets a pointless discussion about moving the article to his BIRTH NAME just because he got canned. (There is something called '''COMPETENCE''' and every editor is expected to have it ([[WP:COMPETENCE]]). That's why I closed the discussion. Because it was a pointless one that would go nowhere. On the other hand, the discussion you opened could be a productive one. I personally oppose, but others might agree. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ ::That's okay, I have nothing against you either. What does upset me is people opening pointless move discussions without knowing (or understanding) the guidelines. [[WP:COMMONNAME]] isn't that hard to understand, but some users like Pedigree, NascarKing and others just love to open pointless move discussions (See: [[Talk:Mr. Kennedy#Request Move]] for an example of a long move discussion that was completely pointless). These discussions are counterproductive as they waste people's time instead of improving articles. Instead of focusing on article titles, people should be EDITING THE ARTICLES. An article like Kaval's needs copyediting, better images, reliable sourcing, etc. Instead of that attention, it gets a pointless discussion about moving the article to his BIRTH NAME just because he got canned. (There is something called '''COMPETENCE''' and every editor is expected to have it ([[WP:COMPETENCE]]). That's why I closed the discussion. Because it was a pointless one that would go nowhere. On the other hand, the discussion you opened could be a productive one. I personally oppose, but others might agree. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User:Feedback|<big><font color="#039">'''''Feed'''''</big>]][[Special:Contributions/Feedback|<big><font color="#008000">'''''back'''''</big>]] <big><sup>[[User talk:Feedback|'''☎''']]</sup></big></span> 16:20, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

263699 +++$+++ Nhprman +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-05 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.154815800E09 +++$+++ Please do not post warning about photos that are properly tagged. Publicity shots are completely legitimate for posting on Wikipedia, if they are tagged as such. (Please see wording of tag, below, that was used when first uploaded.) In addition, signed personal messages should not be left on the image description lines. Thank you. I understand it's the mission of some people to denude Wikipedia of all images, but there needs to be a limit to that zealousness. Thank you. - [[User:Nhprman|Nhprman]]  +++$+++ Please do not post warning about photos that are properly tagged. Publicity shots are completely legitimate for posting on Wikipedia, if they are tagged as such. (Please see wording of tag, below, that was used when first uploaded.) In addition, signed personal messages should not be left on the image description lines. Thank you. I understand it's the mission of some people to denude Wikipedia of all images, but there needs to be a limit to that zealousness. Thank you. - [[User:Nhprman|Nhprman]] [[User:Nhprman/Userinterestlist|<small><sup>List</sup></small>]] 15:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
263700 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263699 +++$+++ 263699 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.154820840E09 +++$+++ I may have been incorrect about the tagging of that image, However, my message was for the delteing admin and to ensure high visibility: I will continue that practise, than you. At the time of tagging it did not have a source. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image:HeadshotJoshLogan.jpg&oldid=67804677]. I've deleted your copy and paste of the text from the tag, becasue of clutter. Also, please link to the image in question when you are discussing it in talk pages, so I don't have to hunt for it: [[:Image:HeadshotJoshLogan.jpg]] Also, there is good rationale for the image, addressing out fair use criteria.  +++$+++ :I may have been incorrect about the tagging of that image, However, my message was for the delteing admin and to ensure high visibility: I will continue that practise, than you. At the time of tagging it did not have a source. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:HeadshotJoshLogan.jpg&oldid=67804677]. I've deleted your copy and paste of the text from the tag, becasue of clutter. Also, please link to the image in question when you are discussing it in talk pages, so I don't have to hunt for it: [[:Image:HeadshotJoshLogan.jpg]] Also, there is good rationale for the image, addressing out fair use criteria. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:34, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
263701 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263699 +++$+++ 263700 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.154821140E09 +++$+++ And since you focus upon the wording of the tag, exactly where is it verifiable that it \"is known to come from a press kit or similar source\". At the moment I see a blank screen from CBS, with a ToS prohibiting reproduction, and a third party site. Where is the evidence that this is from a press kit?   +++$+++ ::And since you focus upon the wording of the tag, exactly where is it verifiable that it "is known to come from a press kit or similar source". At the moment I see a blank screen from CBS, with a ToS prohibiting reproduction, and a third party site. Where is the evidence that this is from a press kit?  [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

525845 +++$+++ Bjelleklang +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-30 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.130736300E09 +++$+++ Looks like someone really wants to list people involved with United Detergents. Haven't afd'ed it , as I wanted to hear what you think first, as you are more familiar with the previous attempts.  +++$+++ Looks like someone really wants to list people involved with United Detergents. Haven't afd'ed it , as I wanted to hear what you think first, as you are more familiar with the previous attempts. [[User:Bjelleklang|Bjelleklang]]  -  [[User_talk:Bjelleklang|talk]] 21:25, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
525846 +++$+++ Bjelleklang +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525845 +++$+++ 525845 +++$+++ 2005-10-30 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.130737080E09 +++$+++ OK, will afd Tahir Sohail asap, and also see if I can find some more info about the House of Maqbool.  +++$+++ :OK, will afd Tahir Sohail asap, and also see if I can find some more info about the House of Maqbool. [[User:Bjelleklang|Bjelleklang]]  -  [[User_talk:Bjelleklang|talk]] 21:38, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

263702 +++$+++ Cowman109 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-05 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.154836620E09 +++$+++ Hi, there. I was recently deleting [[WP:COPYVIO|copyvio]] on the episode summaries of scrubs episodes, and I came across [[My Choosiest Choice of All]], an article you created (I originally mixed you up with another editor, sorry about that!). I just wanted to clarify that the content there is indeed original and made by yourself, as many other scrubs episode summaries were direect copyright violations from tv.com and scrubs-tv.com. Thanks. <font color=\"DarkGreen\"> +++$+++ Hi, there. I was recently deleting [[WP:COPYVIO|copyvio]] on the episode summaries of scrubs episodes, and I came across [[My Choosiest Choice of All]], an article you created (I originally mixed you up with another editor, sorry about that!). I just wanted to clarify that the content there is indeed original and made by yourself, as many other scrubs episode summaries were direect copyright violations from tv.com and scrubs-tv.com. Thanks. <font color="DarkGreen">[[User:Cowman109|Cowman109]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Cowman109|Talk]]</sup> 20:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
263703 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263702 +++$+++ 263702 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.154884080E09 +++$+++ Hi. Well, I belive that in GF that it's original.  There's only so many ways things can be said about something that isn't complex, and there will obviously be similarities between summaries, but it certainly isn't a cut and paste. This summary is ''shorter'' at tv.com, and I didn't actually know about the episode guide on scrubs-tv.com -- but I've just [http:\/\/www.scrubs-tv.com\/ep65.html checked] and that's much ''longer''. So, to answer you're question, the article was as original, and is sufficiently different from the two sources you mention. I didn't realise the rest (which I had no hand in crating, but I probably made some frmt tweaks) were copyvios. Shame :(  +++$+++ :Hi. Well, I belive that in GF that it's original.  There's only so many ways things can be said about something that isn't complex, and there will obviously be similarities between summaries, but it certainly isn't a cut and paste. This summary is ''shorter'' at tv.com, and I didn't actually know about the episode guide on scrubs-tv.com -- but I've just [http://www.scrubs-tv.com/ep65.html checked] and that's much ''longer''. So, to answer you're question, the article was as original, and is sufficiently different from the two sources you mention. I didn't realise the rest (which I had no hand in crating, but I probably made some frmt tweaks) were copyvios. Shame :( [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
263704 +++$+++ Cowman109 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263702 +++$+++ 263703 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.155106260E09 +++$+++ Ah, well it's a bit late now for me to respond it seems, but yes, thanks :D. Your user talk page drifted down my watchlist so I missed the reply. :) As to the copyright violation, I asked those who created articles that were not from tv.com or scrubs-tv.com, as I was not made away of scrubs-tv.com until after dealing with many tv.com articles, so I wanted to be definitevely sure that there were no more copyright issues and that there wasn't a third summary page I wasn't aware of. <font color=\"DarkGreen\"> +++$+++ ::Ah, well it's a bit late now for me to respond it seems, but yes, thanks :D. Your user talk page drifted down my watchlist so I missed the reply. :) As to the copyright violation, I asked those who created articles that were not from tv.com or scrubs-tv.com, as I was not made away of scrubs-tv.com until after dealing with many tv.com articles, so I wanted to be definitevely sure that there were no more copyright issues and that there wasn't a third summary page I wasn't aware of. <font color="DarkGreen">[[User:Cowman109|Cowman109]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Cowman109|Talk]]</sup> 23:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
263705 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263702 +++$+++ 263704 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.155106440E09 +++$+++ That's OK, cheers. I didn't feel too guilty about your RFA because it looks like you're pretty safe. :)  +++$+++ :::That's OK, cheers. I didn't feel too guilty about your RFA because it looks like you're pretty safe. :) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
263706 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263702 +++$+++ 263702 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.154907840E09 +++$+++ Cool, cheers. I reckon it would be good to have an infobox with episode numbers. We should probably go slowly on creating the articles: we're better off creating longer articles than lots of stubs.  +++$+++ :Cool, cheers. I reckon it would be good to have an infobox with episode numbers. We should probably go slowly on creating the articles: we're better off creating longer articles than lots of stubs. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:44, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

525847 +++$+++ Doc glasgow +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525847 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-31 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.130829420E09 +++$+++ If you are fairly sure the article is a hoax (and it's best to do a little checking if you can) then nominate  at [[WP:AfD]] - you will find the instructions at the bottom of that page. If you have any difficulties, let me know. -- +++$+++ If you are fairly sure the article is a hoax (and it's best to do a little checking if you can) then nominate  at [[WP:AfD]] - you will find the instructions at the bottom of that page. If you have any difficulties, let me know. --[[User:Doc glasgow|Doc]] [[User talk:Doc glasgow|(?)]] 23:17, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
525848 +++$+++ TenOfAllTrades +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525847 +++$+++ 525847 +++$+++ 2005-11-01 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.130832480E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've short-circuited the process and deleted dear Ariel.  I've confirmed that there isn't an Odell (or anything close) in the Ontario Legislature, and I'm keeping an eye on Nympheta.  +++$+++ :Hi, I've short-circuited the process and deleted dear Ariel.  I've confirmed that there isn't an Odell (or anything close) in the Ontario Legislature, and I'm keeping an eye on Nympheta. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 00:08, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

263707 +++$+++ TheM62Manchester +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-09 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.155180480E09 +++$+++ [[User:Corn Man]] has been reverting non-stop again, please protect the pages to admin only. -- +++$+++ [[User:Corn Man]] has been reverting non-stop again, please protect the pages to admin only. --[[User:TheM62Manchester|TheM62Manchester]] 20:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
263708 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263707 +++$+++ 263707 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.155180780E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ :Done. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

263709 +++$+++ TheM62Manchester +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263709 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-09 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.155181680E09 +++$+++ Have you seen his edit summaries?? -- +++$+++ Have you seen his edit summaries?? --[[User:TheM62Manchester|TheM62Manchester]] 20:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
263710 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263709 +++$+++ 263709 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.155181740E09 +++$+++ Someone's already blocked him for a month for vandalism.  +++$+++ :Someone's already blocked him for a month for vandalism. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

263711 +++$+++ Metros232 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263711 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-09 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.155186420E09 +++$+++ I noticed you removed a speedy delete tag off of the Shannon Hommerbocker article.  Would you please just delete that all together?  It has a protection template on it...but isn't protected.  The protection template was added by [[User:TheM62Manchester]] who doesn't have the ability to protect articles.  The article was deleted once as A7, so I don't see why it would need to be protected unless there's some controversy I'm missing.   +++$+++ I noticed you removed a speedy delete tag off of the Shannon Hommerbocker article.  Would you please just delete that all together?  It has a protection template on it...but isn't protected.  The protection template was added by [[User:TheM62Manchester]] who doesn't have the ability to protect articles.  The article was deleted once as A7, so I don't see why it would need to be protected unless there's some controversy I'm missing.  [[User:Metros232|Metros232]] 22:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
263712 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263711 +++$+++ 263711 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.155186540E09 +++$+++ Gone. I was sure I sw it'd been recreated once before, but I've deleted so much crap tonight...  +++$+++ :Gone. I was sure I sw it'd been recreated once before, but I've deleted so much crap tonight... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:09, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

525856 +++$+++ OwenX +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525856 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-16 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.132138680E09 +++$+++ ERcheck, you have been marking many articles for speedy-deletion. Quite a few of those do not qualify for speedy deletion under [[WP:CSD]]. Please familiarize yourself with this policy so that admins can rely on your input more effectively. Thank you!  +++$+++ ERcheck, you have been marking many articles for speedy-deletion. Quite a few of those do not qualify for speedy deletion under [[WP:CSD]]. Please familiarize yourself with this policy so that admins can rely on your input more effectively. Thank you! [[User:OwenX|Owen&times;]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>&#9742;</big>]] 02:58, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
525857 +++$+++ OwenX +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525856 +++$+++ 525856 +++$+++ 2005-11-16 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.132140120E09 +++$+++ The last one has already been deleted, but the admin who deleted it also agrees the Speedy tag may not have been appropriate.  +++$+++ :The last one has already been deleted, but the admin who deleted it also agrees the Speedy tag may not have been appropriate. [[User:OwenX|Owen&times;]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>&#9742;</big>]] 03:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
525858 +++$+++ OwenX +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525856 +++$+++ 525857 +++$+++ 2005-11-16 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.132141980E09 +++$+++ Yes, I noticed you fixed [[Star and stripe]] correctly; thank you!  As for CSD:A3, it refers to articles where the whole content is just a repeat or rephrase of the title. So, if the whole article only contained the text \"'''an approximation of Pi'''\", you'd be right to tag it. But since that article contained real information ''not contained in the title'' (as well as two external links!), it certainly does not qualify for db-a3. It is, however, a candidate for transwiki to Wikisource, which is usually done through an AfD. Personally, I always try to turn these kinds of articles into redirects. This way, it can be easily reversed if needed, or expanded. It also usually prevents these articles from being recreated. It's not easy coming up with the perfect redirect, but it's worth the effort!  Anyway, keep up the good work, but please be careful.  +++$+++ ::Yes, I noticed you fixed [[Star and stripe]] correctly; thank you!  As for CSD:A3, it refers to articles where the whole content is just a repeat or rephrase of the title. So, if the whole article only contained the text "'''an approximation of Pi'''", you'd be right to tag it. But since that article contained real information ''not contained in the title'' (as well as two external links!), it certainly does not qualify for db-a3. It is, however, a candidate for transwiki to Wikisource, which is usually done through an AfD. Personally, I always try to turn these kinds of articles into redirects. This way, it can be easily reversed if needed, or expanded. It also usually prevents these articles from being recreated. It's not easy coming up with the perfect redirect, but it's worth the effort!  Anyway, keep up the good work, but please be careful. [[User:OwenX|Owen&times;]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>&#9742;</big>]] 03:53, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

263713 +++$+++ TheM62Manchester +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-09 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.155187740E09 +++$+++ <\/div><!-- Template:smile --> -- +++$+++ </div><!-- Template:smile --> --[[User:TheM62Manchester|TheM62Manchester]] 22:29, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
263714 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263713 +++$+++ 263713 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.155191580E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)]]. Do you seriously think the articst meets these criteria? If his 'comrades' are similar, then they need to be deleted also. Thanks for listing them.  +++$+++ :Please see [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)]]. Do you seriously think the articst meets these criteria? If his 'comrades' are similar, then they need to be deleted also. Thanks for listing them. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
263715 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263713 +++$+++ 263713 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.155226500E09 +++$+++ Hehe. The specific guideline for artists is that their work \"is widely recognized (for better or worse) and who are likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field.\" I don't think these mae the mark. Artists with punk beliefs sounds great, and interesting, so good luck to them. Unnotable punk bands (student bands, and the like) would also be deleted. P.S. You can sign your osts using <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>  +++$+++ :Hehe. The specific guideline for artists is that their work "is widely recognized (for better or worse) and who are likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field." I don't think these mae the mark. Artists with punk beliefs sounds great, and interesting, so good luck to them. Unnotable punk bands (student bands, and the like) would also be deleted. P.S. You can sign your osts using <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

263716 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263716 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.155239460E09 +++$+++ His comrades have been exhibited widely, including museums and Liverpool Biennial. I have not heard of Farrer, however.  +++$+++ His comrades have been exhibited widely, including museums and Liverpool Biennial. I have not heard of Farrer, however. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 12:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
263717 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263716 +++$+++ 263716 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.155239940E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I checked their pages and the others seem OK.  +++$+++ :Yeah, I checked their pages and the others seem OK. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

263718 +++$+++ Dark Kubrick +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.155201120E09 +++$+++ Hi. I've been working on [[Jaws (film)]] extensively the past few days. I hope to get it to FA one day. I'm worried that the books in the references section need to be inline cited, but I don't own the books and I'm not going to buy them solely for Wikipedia. After looking through the edit history, I saw you were the one who put in the references section. Do you own these books, and if you do could you help cite some of the info here? Thanks. - +++$+++ Hi. I've been working on [[Jaws (film)]] extensively the past few days. I hope to get it to FA one day. I'm worried that the books in the references section need to be inline cited, but I don't own the books and I'm not going to buy them solely for Wikipedia. After looking through the edit history, I saw you were the one who put in the references section. Do you own these books, and if you do could you help cite some of the info here? Thanks. -[[User:Dark Kubrick|Dark Kubrick]] 02:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
263719 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263718 +++$+++ 263718 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 09:16:00 +++$+++ 1.155226560E09 +++$+++ Will do: I'll put it on my to do list. I have a signed copy of ''The Jaws Log'' from Gottlieb :)  +++$+++ :Will do: I'll put it on my to do list. I have a signed copy of ''The Jaws Log'' from Gottlieb :) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

1575 +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ Cloudz679 +++$+++ 1575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-28 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.301334240E09 +++$+++ Hello. I noticed you have been continuously creating articles about Czech football clubs. I would like to ask you, if you are considering creating articles about former notable Czech clubs or still existing clubs, notable in the past. There are still many of them, missing own article on English Wikipedia, like e.g. [[cs:Nuselsk\xfd SK]], [[cs:\u010cechie Karl\xedn]], [[cs:1. SK Prost\u011bjov]] or [[cs:SK Olomouc ASO]]. There are also many notable clubs without articles on Czech wiki. -  +++$+++ Hello. I noticed you have been continuously creating articles about Czech football clubs. I would like to ask you, if you are considering creating articles about former notable Czech clubs or still existing clubs, notable in the past. There are still many of them, missing own article on English Wikipedia, like e.g. [[cs:Nuselský SK]], [[cs:Čechie Karlín]], [[cs:1. SK Prostějov]] or [[cs:SK Olomouc ASO]]. There are also many notable clubs without articles on Czech wiki. - [[User:Darwinek|Darwinek]] ([[User talk:Darwinek|talk]]) 10:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
1576 +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ Cloudz679 +++$+++ 1575 +++$+++ 1575 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.301374320E09 +++$+++ That's great news! 2. liga articles are really missing and appreciated. Anyways, if you would need help with Czech, you can write me anytime. -  +++$+++ : That's great news! 2. liga articles are really missing and appreciated. Anyways, if you would need help with Czech, you can write me anytime. - [[User:Darwinek|Darwinek]] ([[User talk:Darwinek|talk]]) 21:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
1577 +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ Cloudz679 +++$+++ 1575 +++$+++ 1576 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.301608980E09 +++$+++ Hello. I've added some further information to Prost\u011bjov article. The info on Czech Wikipedia is very detailed. It describes mostly the beginnings of the club and its amateur years. -  +++$+++ :: Hello. I've added some further information to Prostějov article. The info on Czech Wikipedia is very detailed. It describes mostly the beginnings of the club and its amateur years. - [[User:Darwinek|Darwinek]] ([[User talk:Darwinek|talk]]) 15:03, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

263720 +++$+++ Dark Kubrick +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.155260820E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much. Where did you get ''The Jaws Log'' signed? - +++$+++ Thank you very much. Where did you get ''The Jaws Log'' signed? -[[User:Dark Kubrick|Dark Kubrick]] 18:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
263721 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263720 +++$+++ 263720 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.155262740E09 +++$+++ I had a correspondance going with Gottlieb years ago, before the book was reprinted. He posted me a copy :) Very courteous polite man.  +++$+++ :I had a correspondance going with Gottlieb years ago, before the book was reprinted. He posted me a copy :) Very courteous polite man. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

263723 +++$+++ ClintFord +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.155213300E09 +++$+++ Hello. I created a page today ''[Sully(AskSully.com)]'', and it was instantly marked for speedy deletion. I responded to to the tag and asked why the page was tagged, and what I could do to help prevent the page from ultimate deletion. Instead, the page was simply deleted and I was not contacted at all.  I'm not learning anything from this. So, unless someone tips me off as to why the page was yanked, I'm bound to do it again. Everything I wrote was factual about an interesting website author who has a fanbase. What did I do wrong? Thank you. -- +++$+++ Hello. I created a page today ''[Sully(AskSully.com)]'', and it was instantly marked for speedy deletion. I responded to to the tag and asked why the page was tagged, and what I could do to help prevent the page from ultimate deletion. Instead, the page was simply deleted and I was not contacted at all.  I'm not learning anything from this. So, unless someone tips me off as to why the page was yanked, I'm bound to do it again. Everything I wrote was factual about an interesting website author who has a fanbase. What did I do wrong? Thank you. --[[User:ClintFord|Schmendrick]] 05:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
263724 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263723 +++$+++ 263723 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.155226320E09 +++$+++ OK. See [[WP:WEB]]. It has a set of criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :OK. See [[WP:WEB]]. It has a set of criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
263725 +++$+++ ClintFord +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263723 +++$+++ 263724 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.155243780E09 +++$+++ I have looked over your reference, and I assume your reasoning for pulling the site was because it appeared to be advertising? If so, WP:WEB states, ''\"...'Wikipedia articles are not advertisements' is an official policy of long standing. Advertising is either '''cleaned up to adhere to the neutral point of view''' or deleted.[[WP:WEB#_note-1|[2]]]\"''  I was never given the opportunity to clean-up this article, and no one stated what part of the article appeared to be non-neutral. May I please be given the opportunity to correct the article, rather than having the work obliterated? -- +++$+++ ::I have looked over your reference, and I assume your reasoning for pulling the site was because it appeared to be advertising? If so, WP:WEB states, ''"...'Wikipedia articles are not advertisements' is an official policy of long standing. Advertising is either '''cleaned up to adhere to the neutral point of view''' or deleted.[[WP:WEB#_note-1|[2]]]"''  I was never given the opportunity to clean-up this article, and no one stated what part of the article appeared to be non-neutral. May I please be given the opportunity to correct the article, rather than having the work obliterated? --[[User:ClintFord|Schmendrick]] 14:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
263726 +++$+++ ClintFord +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263723 +++$+++ 263724 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.155248100E09 +++$+++ Once again, you have deleted one of my pages without a tag (Ask Sully) or even giving me a chance to fix anything. Please consider being more friendly with your deletes and allowing people the opportunity to repair their work before you decide it should not exist.  You are supposed to allow the author the chance to remedy the situation first, which you have consistantly not. I humbly and politely request that you restore both of my articles and tell me what needs to be changed in order to meet your expectations. Your current methods are unprofessional and unhelpful. Thank you. -- +++$+++ ::Once again, you have deleted one of my pages without a tag (Ask Sully) or even giving me a chance to fix anything. Please consider being more friendly with your deletes and allowing people the opportunity to repair their work before you decide it should not exist.  You are supposed to allow the author the chance to remedy the situation first, which you have consistantly not. I humbly and politely request that you restore both of my articles and tell me what needs to be changed in order to meet your expectations. Your current methods are unprofessional and unhelpful. Thank you. --[[User:ClintFord|Schmendrick]] 15:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
263727 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263723 +++$+++ 263726 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.155249780E09 +++$+++ Which of the criteria on [[WP:WEB]] do you think your article satisfies?  +++$+++ :::Which of the criteria on [[WP:WEB]] do you think your article satisfies? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
263728 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263723 +++$+++ 263723 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.155240780E09 +++$+++ Hello. We have notability guidelines over topics we accept for articles. Please see [[Wikipedia:Notability]]. I'm fairly sure your online game doesn't meet our criteria. Best,  +++$+++ :Hello. We have notability guidelines over topics we accept for articles. Please see [[Wikipedia:Notability]]. I'm fairly sure your online game doesn't meet our criteria. Best, [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

1581 +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ Cloudz679 +++$+++ 1581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-13 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.307993460E09 +++$+++ Hello. Please, see the detailed managerial history at the Sparta's official website, [http:\/\/www.sparta.cz\/cs\/klub\/historie\/treneri.shtml here]. -  +++$+++ Hello. Please, see the detailed managerial history at the Sparta's official website, [http://www.sparta.cz/cs/klub/historie/treneri.shtml here]. - [[User:Darwinek|Darwinek]] ([[User talk:Darwinek|talk]]) 12:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
1582 +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ Cloudz679 +++$+++ 1581 +++$+++ 1581 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.308006300E09 +++$+++ If no other different sources could be found, the article should be changed, same as {{[[Template:Sparta Prague managers|Sparta Prague managers]]}}. -  +++$+++ : If no other different sources could be found, the article should be changed, same as {{[[Template:Sparta Prague managers|Sparta Prague managers]]}}. - [[User:Darwinek|Darwinek]] ([[User talk:Darwinek|talk]]) 16:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

1584 +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ Cloudz679 +++$+++ 1584 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-29 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.309385700E09 +++$+++ Hello. As far as I know, we have categories for players of all Gambrinus liga clubs, except Bohemians. Do you think the category \"Bohemians 1905 players\", categorizing current and former players, should be created? -  +++$+++ Hello. As far as I know, we have categories for players of all Gambrinus liga clubs, except Bohemians. Do you think the category "Bohemians 1905 players", categorizing current and former players, should be created? - [[User:Darwinek|Darwinek]] ([[User talk:Darwinek|talk]]) 15:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
1585 +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ Cloudz679 +++$+++ 1584 +++$+++ 1584 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.309395300E09 +++$+++ Thank you. :) -  +++$+++ : Thank you. :) - [[User:Darwinek|Darwinek]] ([[User talk:Darwinek|talk]]) 17:55, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

263729 +++$+++ Doyler +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263729 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.155256860E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Doyler|Doyler]] 17:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
263730 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263729 +++$+++ 263729 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.155257700E09 +++$+++ Please see [[WP:MUSIC]]. The band fails those criteria.  +++$+++ :Please see [[WP:MUSIC]]. The band fails those criteria. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
263731 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263729 +++$+++ 263729 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.155267180E09 +++$+++ How popular? Has it received a lot of press attention? Attention from third party sources? (and we're not talking about forums). The concept of Mario is pretty notable worldwide.  +++$+++ :How popular? Has it received a lot of press attention? Attention from third party sources? (and we're not talking about forums). The concept of Mario is pretty notable worldwide. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
263732 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263729 +++$+++ 263729 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.155268560E09 +++$+++ I'm sure your comic is very fine, and those who read it enjoy it. Unfortunately the issue is not about the comic's quality, or whether I like it. It is about the issues I mentioned in my above post.  An article about a school magazine or newspaper would also be rejected on the same grounds.  +++$+++ :I'm sure your comic is very fine, and those who read it enjoy it. Unfortunately the issue is not about the comic's quality, or whether I like it. It is about the issues I mentioned in my above post.  An article about a school magazine or newspaper would also be rejected on the same grounds. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
263733 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263729 +++$+++ 263729 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.155269400E09 +++$+++ lol. Take it easy :)  +++$+++ :lol. Take it easy :) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

525875 +++$+++ Kenyon +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-29 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.135921740E09 +++$+++ Hi, you don't need to add articles to categories and their subcategories.  For example, if someone is a general in the Marine Corps, they should only be categorized in [[:Category:U.S. Marine Corps generals]], not also [[:Category:U.S. Marine Corps officers]] and\/or [[:Category:U.S. Marines]].  So you might have noticed me removing a lot of redundant categories.  See [[WP:CG]].  Nice work on all the [[USMC]] articles, by the way. &mdash; +++$+++ Hi, you don't need to add articles to categories and their subcategories.  For example, if someone is a general in the Marine Corps, they should only be categorized in [[:Category:U.S. Marine Corps generals]], not also [[:Category:U.S. Marine Corps officers]] and/or [[:Category:U.S. Marines]].  So you might have noticed me removing a lot of redundant categories.  See [[WP:CG]].  Nice work on all the [[USMC]] articles, by the way. &mdash;[[User:Kenyon|Kenyon]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Kenyon|t]]&middot;[[Special:Contributions/Kenyon|c]]) 21:49, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
525876 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525875 +++$+++ 525875 +++$+++ 2005-12-29 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.135924560E09 +++$+++ Semper Fi!  &mdash; +++$+++ :Semper Fi!  &mdash;[[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] @ 22:36, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
525877 +++$+++ Kenyon +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525875 +++$+++ 525876 +++$+++ 2005-12-29 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.135924920E09 +++$+++ No, if you categorize a general in [[:Category:U.S. Marine Corps generals]], they shouldn't be also listed in [[:Category:U.S. Marine Corps officers]] and\/or [[:Category:U.S. Marines]], since those are direct parent categories.  Semper Fi! &mdash; +++$+++ ::No, if you categorize a general in [[:Category:U.S. Marine Corps generals]], they shouldn't be also listed in [[:Category:U.S. Marine Corps officers]] and/or [[:Category:U.S. Marines]], since those are direct parent categories.  Semper Fi! &mdash;[[User:Kenyon|Kenyon]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Kenyon|t]]&middot;[[Special:Contributions/Kenyon|c]]) 22:42, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

263734 +++$+++ Richard Jackson +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263734 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-11 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.155319620E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm new to the wiki editing community so I'm still unsure about how things are done. You deleted my article on Dave Evans (musician), and I realise now it was non-notable. I was wondering, would it still be acceptable to add him to the list of names at [[David Evans]]? Cheers.  +++$+++ Hi, I'm new to the wiki editing community so I'm still unsure about how things are done. You deleted my article on Dave Evans (musician), and I realise now it was non-notable. I was wondering, would it still be acceptable to add him to the list of names at [[David Evans]]? Cheers. [[User:Richard Jackson|Richard]] 11:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
263735 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263734 +++$+++ 263734 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.155319920E09 +++$+++ Hello. I don't think so, really. I don't see the point. If he's not notable by our guidelines then it's unlikely people would be searching for him.  +++$+++ :Hello. I don't think so, really. I don't see the point. If he's not notable by our guidelines then it's unlikely people would be searching for him. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:12, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
263736 +++$+++ Richard Jackson +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263734 +++$+++ 263735 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.155321960E09 +++$+++ Okay. It's just that I searched for him to no avail, and thought I'd make it easier for other people doing the same. But I guess if hardly anybody knows about him, it'd just be taking up space.  +++$+++ ::Okay. It's just that I searched for him to no avail, and thought I'd make it easier for other people doing the same. But I guess if hardly anybody knows about him, it'd just be taking up space. [[User:Richard Jackson|Richard]] 11:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

1591 +++$+++ IZAK +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-17 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.297946760E09 +++$+++ Hi William S. Saturn: If you have just sent me an Email, could you let me know why and what you have on your mind etc, you can let me know that by Email as well. But I will not respond by Email until I get to know you better. If ''possible'' we can talk on this page or on my user talk page if it is a ''reasonable'' matter. I tried to find you on the [[User:William Saturn]] page but it's blanked, so I came here because that was also a user name in your Email to me. If this is not the person who wants to contact me, then kindly ignore and\/or delete this message. Thanks for your understanding. Sincerely,  +++$+++ Hi William S. Saturn: If you have just sent me an Email, could you let me know why and what you have on your mind etc, you can let me know that by Email as well. But I will not respond by Email until I get to know you better. If ''possible'' we can talk on this page or on my user talk page if it is a ''reasonable'' matter. I tried to find you on the [[User:William Saturn]] page but it's blanked, so I came here because that was also a user name in your Email to me. If this is not the person who wants to contact me, then kindly ignore and/or delete this message. Thanks for your understanding. Sincerely, [[User:IZAK|IZAK]] ([[User talk:IZAK|talk]]) 04:46, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
1592 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1591 +++$+++ 1591 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.298032440E09 +++$+++ Please respond via e-mail due to a sensitive matter.-- +++$+++ :Please respond via e-mail due to a sensitive matter.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 04:34, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
1593 +++$+++ IZAK +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1591 +++$+++ 1592 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.298049480E09 +++$+++ Hi, please feel free to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:EmailUser\/IZAK Email me] again with what your concerns are or whatever you want to know, and please feel free to elaborate, I will keep it confidential. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Hi, please feel free to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/IZAK Email me] again with what your concerns are or whatever you want to know, and please feel free to elaborate, I will keep it confidential. Thanks. [[User:IZAK|IZAK]] ([[User talk:IZAK|talk]]) 09:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

263737 +++$+++ pd_THOR +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-11 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.155361560E09 +++$+++ As an admin, and someone whose edits I have respected and appreciated, can I get your 2\xa2 on this article ([[February 12, 1809]]).  I've made several edits which are pretty intentful, but have been removed each time.  Before I take actions ... that might be construed poorly, would you look at the article and my edits in paticular and give me some feedback.  Thanks!  \u2014  ''' +++$+++ As an admin, and someone whose edits I have respected and appreciated, can I get your 2¢ on this article ([[February 12, 1809]]).  I've made several edits which are pretty intentful, but have been removed each time.  Before I take actions ... that might be construed poorly, would you look at the article and my edits in paticular and give me some feedback.  Thanks!  —  '''[[User:pd_THOR|<span style="color:#CC0000;">pd_THOR</span>]]''' <sup>|''' [[User_talk:pd_THOR|=/\=]]</sup> | 22:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
263738 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263737 +++$+++ 263737 +++$+++ 2006-08-12 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.155442980E09 +++$+++ Hi. Well, it seems as if you want to turn it into a redirect. My initial opinion is that I agree. The chances anyone would search for that specific date are slim, and Feb 12 and the two biographic artciles cover everything else. Perhaps it might be worth listing it on AFD?  +++$+++ :Hi. Well, it seems as if you want to turn it into a redirect. My initial opinion is that I agree. The chances anyone would search for that specific date are slim, and Feb 12 and the two biographic artciles cover everything else. Perhaps it might be worth listing it on AFD? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
263739 +++$+++ pd_THOR +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263737 +++$+++ 263738 +++$+++ 2006-08-12 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.155444840E09 +++$+++ That was going to be my next action, but I wanted a seconding on the idea: I don't want to seem ogreishor anything.  Thanks, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/February 12, 1809|I'll do that]].  \u2014  ''' +++$+++ :: That was going to be my next action, but I wanted a seconding on the idea: I don't want to seem ogreishor anything.  Thanks, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/February 12, 1809|I'll do that]].  —  '''[[User:pd_THOR|<span style="color:#CC0000;">pd_THOR</span>]]''' <sup>|''' [[User_talk:pd_THOR|=/\=]]</sup> | 21:54, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

1594 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1594 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-18 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.298040960E09 +++$+++ The same primary contributors who have worked on both Nixon and Reagan have whitewashed both subjects, carefully, cleverly, and purposefully couching major critical aspects in ambiguous terms and light prose.  This is pure propaganda.  +++$+++ The same primary contributors who have worked on both Nixon and Reagan have whitewashed both subjects, carefully, cleverly, and purposefully couching major critical aspects in ambiguous terms and light prose.  This is pure propaganda. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 06:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
1595 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1594 +++$+++ 1594 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.298041260E09 +++$+++ My removal of nonsense does not imply that I would like additional nonsense to be added to my talk page. If you have a specific concern, please bring it up on the article talk page.-- +++$+++ :My removal of nonsense does not imply that I would like additional nonsense to be added to my talk page. If you have a specific concern, please bring it up on the article talk page.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 07:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
1596 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1594 +++$+++ 1595 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.298047980E09 +++$+++ Will do.  Give me a few days as I'm in the middle of something right now.  Feel free to remove this nonsense from your talk page.  +++$+++ ::Will do.  Give me a few days as I'm in the middle of something right now.  Feel free to remove this nonsense from your talk page. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 08:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

525883 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-07 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.136683500E09 +++$+++ It is done!  Now all you have to do is replace the old image with this one: \"Image:Hagee in MARPAT with Marine.jpg\" I hope that this has solved the problem.  Semper Fi  +++$+++ It is done!  Now all you have to do is replace the old image with this one: "Image:Hagee in MARPAT with Marine.jpg" I hope that this has solved the problem.  Semper Fi [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 17:25, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
525884 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525883 +++$+++ 525883 +++$+++ 2006-01-09 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.136804580E09 +++$+++ I saw the article that's up for deletion.  I'm against its deletion and in favor of the article being merged to the \"United States Marine Corps\" article.  I'll keep my eye on it and merge it myself, if it isn't deleted.  +++$+++ * I saw the article that's up for deletion.  I'm against its deletion and in favor of the article being merged to the "United States Marine Corps" article.  I'll keep my eye on it and merge it myself, if it isn't deleted. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
525885 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525883 +++$+++ 525884 +++$+++ 2006-01-09 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.136807460E09 +++$+++ I agree with you on the redirect and that's the way I would do it. Semper Fi  +++$+++ ** I agree with you on the redirect and that's the way I would do it. Semper Fi [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

263741 +++$+++ 24.126.193.239 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-16 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.155773400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:24.126.193.239|24.126.193.239]] 17:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
263742 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263741 +++$+++ 263741 +++$+++ 2006-08-16 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.155777780E09 +++$+++ The artist does not meet out guidelines concerning notability. Once Cohen satisfies the criteria at [[WP:MUSIC]] then an article can be created.  +++$+++ :The artist does not meet out guidelines concerning notability. Once Cohen satisfies the criteria at [[WP:MUSIC]] then an article can be created. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

1599 +++$+++ Steve98052 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-09 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.299733860E09 +++$+++ Also, feel free to revise my comments about your parody of the video on your comments page if you wish. (Not that it matters, but I stumbled upon the article by way of an edit-conflict warning on an unrelated [[User_talk:VQuakr|talk page]] I was editing.) \u2014  +++$+++ Also, feel free to revise my comments about your parody of the video on your comments page if you wish. (Not that it matters, but I stumbled upon the article by way of an edit-conflict warning on an unrelated [[User_talk:VQuakr|talk page]] I was editing.) — [[User:Steve98052|Steve98052]] ([[User talk:Steve98052|talk]]) 21:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
1600 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1599 +++$+++ 1599 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.299740820E09 +++$+++ Davison's recent appearance on ''[[Tosh.O]]'' has increased media attention. The second AFD from November (two months after the speech) pointed to \"persistent coverage\" as a main deletion\/redirection argument. Since Davison is still receiving press six months after his well-publicized speech, coverage is persistent.-- +++$+++ :Davison's recent appearance on ''[[Tosh.O]]'' has increased media attention. The second AFD from November (two months after the speech) pointed to "persistent coverage" as a main deletion/redirection argument. Since Davison is still receiving press six months after his well-publicized speech, coverage is persistent.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 23:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

1601 +++$+++ Stargat +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-14 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.300151280E09 +++$+++ I'm confused why you believe that I am edit warring ([[User_talk:Stargat#Edit_Warrior|this note on my page]]). Last week we discussed the inclusion of the fact that stock photography was used on the Newt Gingrich fundraising committee website, which you seem to think is important but I think is trivial. I gave a [[Talk:Newt_Gingrich_presidential_campaign,_2012|perfectly reasonable explanation]] for why it should not be included, but you did not respond. Specifically, I challenged your claim that it was \"widely covered\" and demonstrated it was not. Several days later, without any response, I changed it back. Now, I see that you still have not responded on the talk page, but your edit summary stated that \"there is no clear dispute of the material on the talk page\". That's not true. I don't dispute that it's factual, but I do dispute that it's relevant. Based on guidelines, I don't think it belongs. And please do not accuse me of edit warring. I aim to be polite and discuss changes based on policy, but for some reason you won't talk to me.  +++$+++ I'm confused why you believe that I am edit warring ([[User_talk:Stargat#Edit_Warrior|this note on my page]]). Last week we discussed the inclusion of the fact that stock photography was used on the Newt Gingrich fundraising committee website, which you seem to think is important but I think is trivial. I gave a [[Talk:Newt_Gingrich_presidential_campaign,_2012|perfectly reasonable explanation]] for why it should not be included, but you did not respond. Specifically, I challenged your claim that it was "widely covered" and demonstrated it was not. Several days later, without any response, I changed it back. Now, I see that you still have not responded on the talk page, but your edit summary stated that "there is no clear dispute of the material on the talk page". That's not true. I don't dispute that it's factual, but I do dispute that it's relevant. Based on guidelines, I don't think it belongs. And please do not accuse me of edit warring. I aim to be polite and discuss changes based on policy, but for some reason you won't talk to me. [[User:Stargat|Stargat]] ([[User talk:Stargat|talk]]) 18:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
1602 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1601 +++$+++ 1601 +++$+++ 2011-03-14 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.300152480E09 +++$+++ The only meaningful things on the talk page are the links to several news stories about the stock footage, which you provided from the news search I linked. Such a large number of stories describing the website (which is the campaign at this point) certainly merits inclusion. I see no valid argument on the talk page as to why the the material should be erased. Therefore, I conclude that you are edit warring.-- +++$+++ :The only meaningful things on the talk page are the links to several news stories about the stock footage, which you provided from the news search I linked. Such a large number of stories describing the website (which is the campaign at this point) certainly merits inclusion. I see no valid argument on the talk page as to why the the material should be erased. Therefore, I conclude that you are edit warring.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 18:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
1603 +++$+++ Stargat +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1601 +++$+++ 1602 +++$+++ 2011-03-14 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.300154880E09 +++$+++ Three blog posts from the same day, then no further coverage or apparent impact is a \"large number of stories\"? That's just silly. Surely the standard for \"widely covered\" must be higher than that. What's more, I've pointed out how it appears to be a textbook case of [[WP:RECENTISM]]. These are valid arguments, are they not?  +++$+++ ::Three blog posts from the same day, then no further coverage or apparent impact is a "large number of stories"? That's just silly. Surely the standard for "widely covered" must be higher than that. What's more, I've pointed out how it appears to be a textbook case of [[WP:RECENTISM]]. These are valid arguments, are they not? [[User:Stargat|Stargat]] ([[User talk:Stargat|talk]]) 19:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
1604 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1601 +++$+++ 1603 +++$+++ 2011-03-14 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.300156260E09 +++$+++ Recentism can only apply when something minor is added to something major that has been going on for a long time. The Newt Gingrich presidential campaign is neither major nor longstanding. I will assume good faith and accept that your removal was based on a misinterpretation of recentism.-- +++$+++ :::Recentism can only apply when something minor is added to something major that has been going on for a long time. The Newt Gingrich presidential campaign is neither major nor longstanding. I will assume good faith and accept that your removal was based on a misinterpretation of recentism.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 19:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
1605 +++$+++ Stargat +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1601 +++$+++ 1604 +++$+++ 2011-03-14 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.300159320E09 +++$+++ The nutshell definition says: \"Some Wikipedia articles tend to focus on recent events. Wikipedia has been praised for the way it deals with current news breaks. Nevertheless, it is appropriate to be aware of balance and historical perspective.\" That seems to support my point that it wasn't a significant event and so shouldn't be there.  +++$+++ ::::The nutshell definition says: "Some Wikipedia articles tend to focus on recent events. Wikipedia has been praised for the way it deals with current news breaks. Nevertheless, it is appropriate to be aware of balance and historical perspective." That seems to support my point that it wasn't a significant event and so shouldn't be there. [[User:Stargat|Stargat]] ([[User talk:Stargat|talk]]) 20:22, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
1606 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1601 +++$+++ 1605 +++$+++ 2011-03-14 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.300160280E09 +++$+++ Again, you are misunderstanding the guideline.  It has absolutely nothing to do with your blanking.  Please re-read what I wrote above.-- +++$+++ :::::Again, you are misunderstanding the guideline.  It has absolutely nothing to do with your blanking.  Please re-read what I wrote above.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 20:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

263746 +++$+++ 24.126.193.239 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-17 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.155859920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:24.126.193.239|24.126.193.239]] 17:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
263747 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263746 +++$+++ 263746 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.155932160E09 +++$+++ No, I didn't fail to see the summary. On this occasion, Redvers is incorrect. The copyright holder is the photographer. On the reverse of most school, and other professional portraits, the imperative 'do not copy' can be found. The parent (aka customer) buys a print, not the copyright. I spent a few years working for a photographic retailer, and this law was made clear to us. Indeed, disciplinary action could have been taken had we allowed the reproduction of such material. Most customers were unhappy when they discovered that they didn't own the copyright.  +++$+++ :No, I didn't fail to see the summary. On this occasion, Redvers is incorrect. The copyright holder is the photographer. On the reverse of most school, and other professional portraits, the imperative 'do not copy' can be found. The parent (aka customer) buys a print, not the copyright. I spent a few years working for a photographic retailer, and this law was made clear to us. Indeed, disciplinary action could have been taken had we allowed the reproduction of such material. Most customers were unhappy when they discovered that they didn't own the copyright. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

525891 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525891 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-10 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.139563020E09 +++$+++ In addition, I've been logged out mid-edit.  Is Wikipedia currently experiencing a problem?  Or is it my session? &mdash; +++$+++ In addition, I've been logged out mid-edit.  Is Wikipedia currently experiencing a problem?  Or is it my session? &mdash;[[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] @ 01:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
525892 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525891 +++$+++ 525891 +++$+++ 2006-02-10 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.139563560E09 +++$+++ I don't think Wikipedia is experiencing a problem. I have experiecned these problems before, try clearing your browser's cache to fix the problem (Mozilla\/Safari\/Konqueror: hold down Shift while clicking Reload (or press Ctrl-Shift-R), IE: press Ctrl-F5, Opera: press F5.)-- +++$+++ :I don't think Wikipedia is experiencing a problem. I have experiecned these problems before, try clearing your browser's cache to fix the problem (Mozilla/Safari/Konqueror: hold down Shift while clicking Reload (or press Ctrl-Shift-R), IE: press Ctrl-F5, Opera: press F5.)--[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] 01:26, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

263749 +++$+++ Jfp-24 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-19 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.156011000E09 +++$+++ Hi! Thanks for your warm welcome. I have a one question to ask you, I wanted to know how you can become an administrator (like you) on Wikipedia, can anyone eventually become an administrator, I\u2019m quite knew to this site and would love to know how.  +++$+++ Hi! Thanks for your warm welcome. I have a one question to ask you, I wanted to know how you can become an administrator (like you) on Wikipedia, can anyone eventually become an administrator, I’m quite knew to this site and would love to know how. [[User:Jfp-24|Jfp-24]] 11:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
263750 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263749 +++$+++ 263749 +++$+++ 2006-08-19 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.156012740E09 +++$+++ Hiya. Admins are selected by community consensus, at [[WP:RFA]]. You'll see from the current votes at that page the standards required. You are expected to have at last a few thousand edits, knowledge of policy, evidence of mature conduct, little evidence of immature\/incivil conduct, etc, and participation in some community activities (fighting vandalism, copyright problems, etc.) As a new user, it's waaay off for you, but that's what's roughly expected before you're nominated. The tone of your comment (i.e. the final phrase) at [[Talk:The Texas Chain Saw Massacre]] is one such example that might be used against you, because it is rather confrontational.  +++$+++ :Hiya. Admins are selected by community consensus, at [[WP:RFA]]. You'll see from the current votes at that page the standards required. You are expected to have at last a few thousand edits, knowledge of policy, evidence of mature conduct, little evidence of immature/incivil conduct, etc, and participation in some community activities (fighting vandalism, copyright problems, etc.) As a new user, it's waaay off for you, but that's what's roughly expected before you're nominated. The tone of your comment (i.e. the final phrase) at [[Talk:The Texas Chain Saw Massacre]] is one such example that might be used against you, because it is rather confrontational. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
263751 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263749 +++$+++ 263750 +++$+++ 2006-08-19 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.156022760E09 +++$+++ Hi JPS, just to fill you in, this is the latest sock by infamous and indefinitely blocked [[User:Jackp]]. Mostly famous, but by no means limited to, his disruptive and impenatrably clueless edits on the [[Sydney]] page. Check out the discussion tab - most of it is trying to reason with Jackp. Other socks include [[User:Jfp-24]] and [[User:Movie-lover93]] and [[User:Jfpearce]]. We've spent a lot of time coaching Jack and providing him with the benefit of the doubt. Once bloked he reappeared under other names or anonymous with behaviour identical to that he had promised he wouldn't repeat while pleading to be unblocked.  +++$+++ ::Hi JPS, just to fill you in, this is the latest sock by infamous and indefinitely blocked [[User:Jackp]]. Mostly famous, but by no means limited to, his disruptive and impenatrably clueless edits on the [[Sydney]] page. Check out the discussion tab - most of it is trying to reason with Jackp. Other socks include [[User:Jfp-24]] and [[User:Movie-lover93]] and [[User:Jfpearce]]. We've spent a lot of time coaching Jack and providing him with the benefit of the doubt. Once bloked he reappeared under other names or anonymous with behaviour identical to that he had promised he wouldn't repeat while pleading to be unblocked. [[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 14:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

263752 +++$+++ Rebecca +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263752 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-20 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.156071900E09 +++$+++ Could you please be a bit more careful about who you choose to welcome? Posting a message on Jack's talk page urging him to stick around is not helpful when he's a community banned user editing under his umpteenth sockpuppet.  +++$+++ Could you please be a bit more careful about who you choose to welcome? Posting a message on Jack's talk page urging him to stick around is not helpful when he's a community banned user editing under his umpteenth sockpuppet. [[User:Rebecca|Rebecca]] 04:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
263753 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263752 +++$+++ 263752 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.156073580E09 +++$+++ lol - chances are that JPS did not know about Jackp let alone that Jfp-24 is another sock for him. But Rebecca, you have done some mighty fine work keeping a check on him. Thanks  +++$+++ : lol - chances are that JPS did not know about Jackp let alone that Jfp-24 is another sock for him. But Rebecca, you have done some mighty fine work keeping a check on him. Thanks [[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 04:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
263754 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263752 +++$+++ 263753 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.156097880E09 +++$+++ Yes, thanks, Merbabu, for both the heads up and also the defence from that rather lacklustre admonishment. When I think about it, I had a brief run in with the original user (which might explain why we came here). But, that was the other side of the summer, and my little brain can only store so many things.  +++$+++ ::Yes, thanks, Merbabu, for both the heads up and also the defence from that rather lacklustre admonishment. When I think about it, I had a brief run in with the original user (which might explain why we came here). But, that was the other side of the summer, and my little brain can only store so many things. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
263755 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263752 +++$+++ 263754 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.156100100E09 +++$+++ lol - He might be back. user [[User:Kill-bill-93]] looks suspiciously similar. Note the 93 and article choice. +++$+++ :::lol - He might be back. user [[User:Kill-bill-93]] looks suspiciously similar. Note the 93 and article choice.[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 11:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
263756 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263752 +++$+++ 263755 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.156100580E09 +++$+++ Yeah, chances are it is. How long do you reckon it will be before he edits a Sydney related article?  +++$+++ ::::Yeah, chances are it is. How long do you reckon it will be before he edits a Sydney related article? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
263757 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263752 +++$+++ 263756 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.156188600E09 +++$+++ How long before he edits Sydney?? Less than 24 hours: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sydney&action=history].  It's actually quite entertaining. On my user page yesterday he claimed he wasn't Jackp, yet in [[Sydney]] he goes and makes the same edits that have been made dozens of times under Jackp then removed by other editors.  +++$+++ ::::: How long before he edits Sydney?? Less than 24 hours: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sydney&action=history].  It's actually quite entertaining. On my user page yesterday he claimed he wasn't Jackp, yet in [[Sydney]] he goes and makes the same edits that have been made dozens of times under Jackp then removed by other editors. [[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 12:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
263758 +++$+++ JPD +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263752 +++$+++ 263757 +++$+++ 2006-08-22 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.156270620E09 +++$+++ Oh yes, it's all quite fun. But yes, The JPS has run into Jack before - somehow Jack thought it was me! [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AThe_Texas_Chain_Saw_Massacre&diff=62324367&oldid=62004890]  +++$+++ ::::::Oh yes, it's all quite fun. But yes, The JPS has run into Jack before - somehow Jack thought it was me! [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AThe_Texas_Chain_Saw_Massacre&diff=62324367&oldid=62004890] [[User:JPD|JPD]] ([[User talk:JPD|talk]]) 11:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

1611 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-29 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.304130840E09 +++$+++ Sorry this newsletter is going out a little earlier than expected- there is a busy weekend coming up! A running total of claims can be seen [[Wikipedia:WikiCup\/History\/2011\/Running totals|here]]. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup\/Reviews]]. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]] and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup\/Newsletter\/Send]].<\/small> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] and  +++$+++ Sorry this newsletter is going out a little earlier than expected- there is a busy weekend coming up! A running total of claims can be seen [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2011/Running totals|here]]. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews]]. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]] and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] and [[User:The ed17|The ed17]] 19:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
1612 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1611 +++$+++ 1611 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.304812980E09 +++$+++ My apologies for that.-- +++$+++ :My apologies for that.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 17:03, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

541254 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-13 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.234512120E09 +++$+++ Can I ask why this page was deleted, considering that it was already a redirect to the current talk for the relative article?  +++$+++ Can I ask why this page was deleted, considering that it was already a redirect to the current talk for the relative article? [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 00:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
541255 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541254 +++$+++ 541254 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.234813440E09 +++$+++ I've now restored this as a redirect to [[Talk:Truth in Numbers]].  +++$+++ : I've now restored this as a redirect to [[Talk:Truth in Numbers]]. [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 11:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

1613 +++$+++ Jay Gatsby +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1613 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-15 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.305523440E09 +++$+++ Please don't revert any changes without explanation. If you want to include Randall Terry in the list of Democratic presidential candidates then please provide a citation which shows that Terry has filed the necessary paperwork with the FEC.  +++$+++ Please don't revert any changes without explanation. If you want to include Randall Terry in the list of Democratic presidential candidates then please provide a citation which shows that Terry has filed the necessary paperwork with the FEC. [[User:Jay Gatsby|Jay Gatsby]]<sup>([[User talk:Jay Gatsby|talk]])</sup> 22:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
1614 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1613 +++$+++ 1613 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.305523800E09 +++$+++ Please do some research before editing wikipedia.-- +++$+++ :Please do some research before editing wikipedia.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 22:30, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

1615 +++$+++ Kuru +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1615 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-21 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.305974340E09 +++$+++ Okay, I've reloaded all the GIS software and took a stab at a Cibolo Creek watershed map.  Please review it [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Cibolo_Creek_Watershed.png here] and let me know if you have any changes.  Alterations are ''very'' easy at this point; the software is crazy flexible now apparently (five years of development were put to good use it seems).  When you're good, I'll add in the little Texas locator map and we should be good to go.  +++$+++ Okay, I've reloaded all the GIS software and took a stab at a Cibolo Creek watershed map.  Please review it [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cibolo_Creek_Watershed.png here] and let me know if you have any changes.  Alterations are ''very'' easy at this point; the software is crazy flexible now apparently (five years of development were put to good use it seems).  When you're good, I'll add in the little Texas locator map and we should be good to go. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk)''</span>]] 03:39, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
1616 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1615 +++$+++ 1615 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.305984240E09 +++$+++ Yes. It looks magnificent. Thank you very much.-- +++$+++ :Yes. It looks magnificent. Thank you very much.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 06:24, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

263760 +++$+++ 24.126.193.239 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263760 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-21 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.156220220E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:24.126.193.239|24.126.193.239]] 21:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
263761 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263760 +++$+++ 263760 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.156225740E09 +++$+++ Hi. Yes, I have had things in the real world to contend with. I'll get on to this soon.  +++$+++ :Hi. Yes, I have had things in the real world to contend with. I'll get on to this soon. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:49, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

1618 +++$+++ Chaser +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-29 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.306727400E09 +++$+++ Please summarize your position in a paragraph [[Talk:United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Request_for_comment|here]]. I think this format is more expedient than a single paragraph describing the dispute.-- +++$+++ Please summarize your position in a paragraph [[Talk:United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Request_for_comment|here]]. I think this format is more expedient than a single paragraph describing the dispute.--[[User:Chaser|Chaser]] ([[User talk:Chaser|talk]]) 20:50, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
1619 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1618 +++$+++ 1618 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.306732620E09 +++$+++ The burden is on you to propose a standard. I stand by the consensus.-- +++$+++ :The burden is on you to propose a standard. I stand by the consensus.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 22:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
1620 +++$+++ Chaser +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1618 +++$+++ 1618 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.306727640E09 +++$+++ BTW, calling him a joke candidate is consistent with [[WP:BLPTALK]]. Take it to [[WP:BLPN]] if you disagree. I'm not interested in arguing with you on that point.-- +++$+++ :BTW, calling him a joke candidate is consistent with [[WP:BLPTALK]]. Take it to [[WP:BLPN]] if you disagree. I'm not interested in arguing with you on that point.--[[User:Chaser|Chaser]] ([[User talk:Chaser|talk]]) 20:54, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
1621 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1618 +++$+++ 1620 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.306732620E09 +++$+++ I really don't care if you are interested or not, any kind of name-calling is inappropriate.-- +++$+++ ::I really don't care if you are interested or not, any kind of name-calling is inappropriate.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 22:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

263763 +++$+++ Bob Castle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-23 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.156397100E09 +++$+++ Hi JPS, I was just wondering where you found the information about a complete ''[[One Foot in the Grave]]'' boxset, partly just to verify it, and partly because I'll be tempted to buy it if it comes out! ''' +++$+++ Hi JPS, I was just wondering where you found the information about a complete ''[[One Foot in the Grave]]'' boxset, partly just to verify it, and partly because I'll be tempted to buy it if it comes out! '''[[User:Bob Castle|Bob]]''' <small>'''[[User talk:Bob Castle|talk]]'''</small> 22:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
263764 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263763 +++$+++ 263763 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.156398480E09 +++$+++ The only place taking preorders at the moment is play.com -- \xa355.99. I might hang on until after Christmas. I always expected a box set so hung off buying the individual discs.  +++$+++ :The only place taking preorders at the moment is play.com -- £55.99. I might hang on until after Christmas. I always expected a box set so hung off buying the individual discs. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:48, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
263765 +++$+++ Bob Castle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263763 +++$+++ 263764 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.156471440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the info. I'm quite surprised that BBC still haven't finished releasing them all yet - it was such a popular series, and they have launched complete DVD sets of far less well-known programmes. ''' +++$+++ ::Thanks for the info. I'm quite surprised that BBC still haven't finished releasing them all yet - it was such a popular series, and they have launched complete DVD sets of far less well-known programmes. '''[[User:Bob Castle|Bob]]''' <small>'''[[User talk:Bob Castle|talk]]'''</small> 19:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
263766 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263763 +++$+++ 263765 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.156471800E09 +++$+++ No problem. I was tempted to buy ''The Vicar of Dibley'' set for \xa350 -- I waited for a few months and got it from play for \xa317.99. I expected the BBC to do ''OFitG''that way, though -- it's more expensive for people to buy them individually. Also, a box set is a good way to use up unsold stock of the originals. The best DVD story was ''Joking Apart'' [http:\/\/www.replaydvd.co.uk].<br>BTW, once the box set becomes available at a wider number of places, it's probably best to remove the citation incase it looks like it's favouring Play. It'll be more easily verifiable using more sources then.  +++$+++ :::No problem. I was tempted to buy ''The Vicar of Dibley'' set for £50 -- I waited for a few months and got it from play for £17.99. I expected the BBC to do ''OFitG''that way, though -- it's more expensive for people to buy them individually. Also, a box set is a good way to use up unsold stock of the originals. The best DVD story was ''Joking Apart'' [http://www.replaydvd.co.uk].<br>BTW, once the box set becomes available at a wider number of places, it's probably best to remove the citation incase it looks like it's favouring Play. It'll be more easily verifiable using more sources then. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
263767 +++$+++ Bob Castle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263763 +++$+++ 263766 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.156473900E09 +++$+++ Yes, I will do once it is mentioned elsewhere - somebody had put a \"citation needed\" on it, so I thought it was better to have a reference for the time being. I didn't know about ''Joking Apart'' - that's quite remarkable. ''' +++$+++ ::::Yes, I will do once it is mentioned elsewhere - somebody had put a "citation needed" on it, so I thought it was better to have a reference for the time being. I didn't know about ''Joking Apart'' - that's quite remarkable. '''[[User:Bob Castle|Bob]]''' <small>'''[[User talk:Bob Castle|talk]]'''</small> 19:45, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

525908 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-21 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.143007380E09 +++$+++ With the recent events that occured involving [[3rd Battalion 1st Marines]] just wanted to ask if you could watch that page and the Wiki news, recent events and a few Iraq pages to make sure these guys get a fair shake as the Anti-American crowd is sure to eat this up. Thanks -- +++$+++ With the recent events that occured involving [[3rd Battalion 1st Marines]] just wanted to ask if you could watch that page and the Wiki news, recent events and a few Iraq pages to make sure these guys get a fair shake as the Anti-American crowd is sure to eat this up. Thanks --[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 22:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
525909 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525908 +++$+++ 525908 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.143057300E09 +++$+++ I went over to the wikinews and just realized that I don't know how to edit over there.  I think I'll stay here where I'm comfortable.  I'm still rolling with active unit articles, are you going to stick with the MOH guys? The portal is looking pretty good.  Please make any changes you see fit.  We're looking better than most but we can improve.  I think we are not to far from a Featured Portal space.  One more thing...  I couldn't decide on a new bio for the portal.  Any ideas? -- +++$+++ * I went over to the wikinews and just realized that I don't know how to edit over there.  I think I'll stay here where I'm comfortable.  I'm still rolling with active unit articles, are you going to stick with the MOH guys? The portal is looking pretty good.  Please make any changes you see fit.  We're looking better than most but we can improve.  I think we are not to far from a Featured Portal space.  One more thing...  I couldn't decide on a new bio for the portal.  Any ideas? --[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 11:55, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

1622 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-31 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.306910400E09 +++$+++ A running total of claims can be seen [[Wikipedia:WikiCup\/History\/2011\/Running totals|here]]. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup\/Reviews]]. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]] and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup\/Newsletter\/Send]].<\/small> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] and  +++$+++ A running total of claims can be seen [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2011/Running totals|here]]. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews]]. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]] and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] and [[User:The ed17|The ed17]] 23:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
1623 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1622 +++$+++ 1622 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.307174460E09 +++$+++ No. Page blanking is vandalism.-- +++$+++ :No. Page blanking is vandalism.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 01:01, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
1624 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1622 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.307196420E09 +++$+++ You blanked reliably sourced candidates. That is unacceptable.-- +++$+++ :::You blanked reliably sourced candidates. That is unacceptable.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 07:07, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

1625 +++$+++ Chaser +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-04 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.307219280E09 +++$+++ At least we agree on something [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Commons:Picture_of_the_Year\/2010\/Final\/File:Mostar_Old_Town_Panorama_2007.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=54970373][http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Commons:Picture_of_the_Year\/2010\/Final\/File:Mostar_Old_Town_Panorama_2007.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=54944081].-- +++$+++ At least we agree on something [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2010/Final/File:Mostar_Old_Town_Panorama_2007.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=54970373][http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2010/Final/File:Mostar_Old_Town_Panorama_2007.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=54944081].--[[User:Chaser|Chaser]] ([[User talk:Chaser|talk]]) 13:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
1626 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1625 +++$+++ 1625 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.307239740E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's a spectacular image.-- +++$+++ :Yes, that's a spectacular image.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 19:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

1627 +++$+++ Avanu +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1627 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-05 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.307339340E09 +++$+++ This word 'santorum' is not widely used, even among those who support its use.  It is a fabricated word explicitly created for political attack.  On top of that, it is a very disgusting thing, and since typically etymology follows from a logical source, we see in this case it is being forced into existence rather than taking the path many words do with logical creation.  Wikipedia is supposed to follow editorial guidelines, not be a tool (as in, be jerks). --  +++$+++ This word 'santorum' is not widely used, even among those who support its use.  It is a fabricated word explicitly created for political attack.  On top of that, it is a very disgusting thing, and since typically etymology follows from a logical source, we see in this case it is being forced into existence rather than taking the path many words do with logical creation.  Wikipedia is supposed to follow editorial guidelines, not be a tool (as in, be jerks). -- [[User:Avanu|Avanu]] ([[User talk:Avanu|talk]]) 22:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
1628 +++$+++ 24.177.120.138 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1627 +++$+++ 1627 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.307339760E09 +++$+++ Avanu - Please bring your concerns to [[Talk:Santorum (neologism)]]. You'll find this discussion well underway. [[Special:Contributions\/24.177.120.138|24.177.120.138]] ( +++$+++ :Avanu - Please bring your concerns to [[Talk:Santorum (neologism)]]. You'll find this discussion well underway. [[Special:Contributions/24.177.120.138|24.177.120.138]] ([[User talk:24.177.120.138|talk]]) 22:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
1629 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1627 +++$+++ 1628 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.307339820E09 +++$+++ BLP violations arise from unsourced or badly sourced claims and\/or combined with synthesis. As I see it, the article is written in a neutral tone, and responsibly provides good information about the neologism for a reader to form his own opinion.-- +++$+++ ::BLP violations arise from unsourced or badly sourced claims and/or combined with synthesis. As I see it, the article is written in a neutral tone, and responsibly provides good information about the neologism for a reader to form his own opinion.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 22:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
1630 +++$+++ Avanu +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1627 +++$+++ 1629 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.307340780E09 +++$+++ Currently, I hardly see how it is not \"disproportionate space to particular viewpoints\".  Since the *entire* article is the viewpoint that this *is* a neologism, and a very gross one at that, it is clearly a violation of BLP.  You can't simply say, well a reliable source said it and now it's ok.  That is not the entirety of the BLP policy.  --  +++$+++ :::Currently, I hardly see how it is not "disproportionate space to particular viewpoints".  Since the *entire* article is the viewpoint that this *is* a neologism, and a very gross one at that, it is clearly a violation of BLP.  You can't simply say, well a reliable source said it and now it's ok.  That is not the entirety of the BLP policy.  -- [[User:Avanu|Avanu]] ([[User talk:Avanu|talk]]) 23:13, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
1631 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1627 +++$+++ 1630 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.307340900E09 +++$+++ Provide some reliable sources that say it is not a neologism.-- +++$+++ ::::Provide some reliable sources that say it is not a neologism.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 23:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
1632 +++$+++ Avanu +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1627 +++$+++ 1631 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.307341680E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry I don't do magic.  I'm talking about WP:Biographies of Living Persons, not WP:Reliable Sources.  BLP says we have to take care in our treatment of living people.  US law lets us get a dig in against political leaders, truly.  But this is not just \"Free Speech-i-pedia\", it is Wikipedia.  We have standards of for encyclopedic content, and that does not solely include whether it comes from a reliable source. --  +++$+++ :::::I'm sorry I don't do magic.  I'm talking about WP:Biographies of Living Persons, not WP:Reliable Sources.  BLP says we have to take care in our treatment of living people.  US law lets us get a dig in against political leaders, truly.  But this is not just "Free Speech-i-pedia", it is Wikipedia.  We have standards of for encyclopedic content, and that does not solely include whether it comes from a reliable source. -- [[User:Avanu|Avanu]] ([[User talk:Avanu|talk]]) 23:28, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
1633 +++$+++ Avanu +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1627 +++$+++ 1631 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.307341980E09 +++$+++ By the way, unrelated to the BLP concerns but strictly speaking, since Santorum was already a word, this is not a neologism, which means a new word, but simply a new meaning for an existing word.  --  +++$+++ :::::By the way, unrelated to the BLP concerns but strictly speaking, since Santorum was already a word, this is not a neologism, which means a new word, but simply a new meaning for an existing word.  -- [[User:Avanu|Avanu]] ([[User talk:Avanu|talk]]) 23:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
1634 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1627 +++$+++ 1633 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.307342220E09 +++$+++ See [[Neologism]].-- +++$+++ ::::::See [[Neologism]].--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 23:37, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
1635 +++$+++ Avanu +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1627 +++$+++ 1633 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.307342400E09 +++$+++ Yes, I know.  New Word.  Neo Logism. --  +++$+++ ::::::Yes, I know.  New Word.  Neo Logism. -- [[User:Avanu|Avanu]] ([[User talk:Avanu|talk]]) 23:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
1636 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1627 +++$+++ 1635 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.307343000E09 +++$+++ \"is a newly coined term, word or phrase, that may be in the process of entering common use, but has not yet been accepted into mainstream language. Neologisms are often directly attributable to a specific person, publication, period, or event\"-- +++$+++ :::::::"is a newly coined term, word or phrase, that may be in the process of entering common use, but has not yet been accepted into mainstream language. Neologisms are often directly attributable to a specific person, publication, period, or event"--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 23:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

263773 +++$+++ PreachasPromis +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-30 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.156935540E09 +++$+++ The band isn't seeking publicity, I just want all the information about the band to be known. It's for my benefit and people who want to know about that, not the bands benefit. I thought wikipedia was supposed to be a place of free exchange of information...  +++$+++ The band isn't seeking publicity, I just want all the information about the band to be known. It's for my benefit and people who want to know about that, not the bands benefit. I thought wikipedia was supposed to be a place of free exchange of information... [[User:PreachasPromis|PreachasPromis]] 03:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
263774 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263773 +++$+++ 263773 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.156953780E09 +++$+++ Ah, OK. Wikipedia is [[WP:NOT|not]] an indiscriminate collection of information. This is why we have notability guidelines and criteria. If your article does not meet them, it is very unlikely that the public will want to know about it. MySpace is the place for them, along with the billion other similar bands.  +++$+++ :Ah, OK. Wikipedia is [[WP:NOT|not]] an indiscriminate collection of information. This is why we have notability guidelines and criteria. If your article does not meet them, it is very unlikely that the public will want to know about it. MySpace is the place for them, along with the billion other similar bands. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

525919 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525919 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-06 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.144347420E09 +++$+++ Since you have the most vis on the USMC bios it might be better for you to update that portion of the Portal.  Ira Hayes has been there awhile.  If this is an issue let me know but with the amount of articles you have thrown together recently I figured you would have better vis on the good ones. -- +++$+++ Since you have the most vis on the USMC bios it might be better for you to update that portion of the Portal.  Ira Hayes has been there awhile.  If this is an issue let me know but with the amount of articles you have thrown together recently I figured you would have better vis on the good ones. --[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 11:17, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
525920 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525919 +++$+++ 525919 +++$+++ 2006-04-07 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.144430040E09 +++$+++ Sorry for dropping the ball recently. I needed to take a break from the USMC articles.  To much Hoorah in a 2 month period and just got burned out for a bit.  I have been spending some time sorting stubs and doing touch-up work.  I have a trip for work coming up in a week so I hope to reengage tomorrow or the next day on USMC articles and get some quality edits and finish up loose ends before I go away.  I won't have access for the last 2 weeks of the month.  I guess for that time the portal will be all you.  Just wanted to give you a heads up. Take it easy-- +++$+++ * Sorry for dropping the ball recently. I needed to take a break from the USMC articles.  To much Hoorah in a 2 month period and just got burned out for a bit.  I have been spending some time sorting stubs and doing touch-up work.  I have a trip for work coming up in a week so I hope to reengage tomorrow or the next day on USMC articles and get some quality edits and finish up loose ends before I go away.  I won't have access for the last 2 weeks of the month.  I guess for that time the portal will be all you.  Just wanted to give you a heads up. Take it easy--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 10:14, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

263776 +++$+++ Bob Castle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263776 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-30 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.156980660E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm guessing that you found out which episode that scene occurs in - anyway, it's in ''The Moral Dimension'' (series 3). ''' +++$+++ Hi, I'm guessing that you found out which episode that scene occurs in - anyway, it's in ''The Moral Dimension'' (series 3). '''[[User:Bob Castle|Bob]]''' <small>'''[[User talk:Bob Castle|talk]]'''</small> 16:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
263777 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263776 +++$+++ 263776 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.156982940E09 +++$+++ Yeah, thanks -- it's actually mentioned in the article itself!!  +++$+++ :Yeah, thanks -- it's actually mentioned in the article itself!! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:09, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

525922 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525922 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-22 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.145703900E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 04:05, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
525923 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525922 +++$+++ 525922 +++$+++ 2006-04-22 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.145704080E09 +++$+++ Licensing tag -- {{tl|PD-USGov-Military-Award}} -- added.  Image had just been uploaded at 03:51, April 22, 2006 (UTC) - was looking for correct tagging in tag list. &mdash; +++$+++ *Licensing tag -- {{tl|PD-USGov-Military-Award}} -- added.  Image had just been uploaded at 03:51, April 22, 2006 (UTC) - was looking for correct tagging in tag list. &mdash;[[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] @ 04:08, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

263779 +++$+++ AnemoneProjectors +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263779 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-05 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.157516100E09 +++$+++ My birthday's not today. Is yours [[30 August]]? --  +++$+++ My birthday's not today. Is yours [[30 August]]? -- [[User:AnemoneProjectors|AnemoneProjectors]] ([[User talk:AnemoneProjectors|talk]]) 21:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
263780 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263779 +++$+++ 263779 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.157516520E09 +++$+++ grrr -- I really must learn to read properly. Today's mine.  +++$+++ :grrr -- I really must learn to read properly. Today's mine. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
263781 +++$+++ AnemoneProjectors +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263779 +++$+++ 263780 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.157517060E09 +++$+++ Well, happy birthday :D --  +++$+++ ::Well, happy birthday :D -- [[User:AnemoneProjectors|AnemoneProjectors]] ([[User talk:AnemoneProjectors|talk]]) 21:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

525924 +++$+++ Travb +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-25 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.145951280E09 +++$+++ I apologize if I offended you.  Like I said, most people make one minor change to this wikipage, and move on.  Since making major changes and adding extensive footnotes a few months ago, which was praised on the talk page, I simply just mindlessly monitor the page to make sure their is correct info, and no vandalism. +++$+++ I apologize if I offended you.  Like I said, most people make one minor change to this wikipage, and move on.  Since making major changes and adding extensive footnotes a few months ago, which was praised on the talk page, I simply just mindlessly monitor the page to make sure their is correct info, and no vandalism.[[User:Travb|Travb]] 00:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
525925 +++$+++ Travb +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525924 +++$+++ 525924 +++$+++ 2006-04-25 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.145953560E09 +++$+++ The picture itself looks better, but a tiy picture next to a larger picture simply looks terrible.  Give me a second and let me see if I can tweak the box. +++$+++ :The picture itself looks better, but a tiy picture next to a larger picture simply looks terrible.  Give me a second and let me see if I can tweak the box.[[User:Travb|Travb]] 01:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
525926 +++$+++ Travb +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525924 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-25 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.145954640E09 +++$+++ I apprecaite you changing the color--the medal looks much better now, but my comment was not in regards to the actual image, but the '''location''' of the image. +++$+++ :::I apprecaite you changing the color--the medal looks much better now, but my comment was not in regards to the actual image, but the '''location''' of the image.[[User:Travb|Travb]] 01:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
525927 +++$+++ Travb +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525924 +++$+++ 525925 +++$+++ 2006-04-25 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.145954760E09 +++$+++ I like Hershel's better.  But it is your call. I really don't care, and I obviously care less than you do.  Far be it from me to stiffle your artistic flair ;-) . +++$+++ ::I like Hershel's better.  But it is your call. I really don't care, and I obviously care less than you do.  Far be it from me to stiffle your artistic flair ;-) .[[User:Travb|Travb]] 01:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

1638 +++$+++ Poyani +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-08 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.307588280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Poyani|Poyani]] ([[User talk:Poyani|talk]]) 19:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
1639 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1638 +++$+++ 1638 +++$+++ 2011-06-08 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.307592300E09 +++$+++ Responded on the talk page.-- +++$+++ :Responded on the talk page.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 21:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

525928 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-28 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.146215760E09 +++$+++ Great work on converting the infoboxes; I'm very grateful for your help.  One minor request, if I may: if you're leaving notes about the conversion on the article talk pages anyway, could you perhps add {{tl|WPMILHIST}} and {{tl|WPMILHIST British military history task force}} there as well?  [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[User:Kirill Lokshin\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin\/Military history|<font color=\"#960018\">h<\/font>]] +++$+++ Great work on converting the infoboxes; I'm very grateful for your help.  One minor request, if I may: if you're leaving notes about the conversion on the article talk pages anyway, could you perhps add {{tl|WPMILHIST}} and {{tl|WPMILHIST British military history task force}} there as well?  [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[User:Kirill Lokshin/Esperanza|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin/Military history|<font color="#960018">h</font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin|in]] 02:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
525929 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525928 +++$+++ 525928 +++$+++ 2006-04-28 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.146216480E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  Don't substitute them, though; those templates don't change very frequently, but they ''do'' change. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[User:Kirill Lokshin\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin\/Military history|<font color=\"#960018\">h<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Thanks!  Don't substitute them, though; those templates don't change very frequently, but they ''do'' change. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[User:Kirill Lokshin/Esperanza|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin/Military history|<font color="#960018">h</font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin|in]] 02:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

1643 +++$+++ KoshVorlon +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-10 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.307754300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:KoshVorlon|<span style="font:95% Trebuchet MS;color:darkred">'''KoshVorlon'''</span>]]<span style="font-size:95%;">''[[User talk:KoshVorlon|'''<sub> Nal</sub><sup>uboutes</sup> ''<sub>Aeria</sub><sup> Gloris</sup>]]'''''</span> 18:05, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
1644 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1643 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.307762760E09 +++$+++ An article ''about'' an attack is not an attack.-- +++$+++ :::An article ''about'' an attack is not an attack.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 20:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

96074 +++$+++ Athrun Atreides +++$+++ Pichpich +++$+++ 96074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-12 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.210617540E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :-)  +++$+++ Thanks! :-) [[User:Athrun Atreides|Athrun Atreides]] ([[User talk:Athrun Atreides|talk]]) 11:39, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
96075 +++$+++ Hmains +++$+++ Pichpich +++$+++ 96074 +++$+++ 96074 +++$+++ 2008-06-02 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.212401040E09 +++$+++ Lists and categories supplement each other, not replace each other.  Both can and do exist for the same subject area, as each has their own benefits and drawbacks.  Removing the political section of [[List of United States magazines]] and linking to a separate article is fine, but not sufficient.  No one maintaining the current list has seen fit to make the fine distinctions you propose.  The fact that a WP article (which is supposed to be supported by published fact) says that a magazine has a certain political stance is sufficient for me to put that article into a category: I use no other facts to put any any article into any category than what the article itself says.  The fact that American liberalism has many shades is not an argument that American liberalism does not exist and that American liberal \"whatevers\" (such as magazines) do not exist and should not be categorized as such--if it can be listed it can be categorized.  No different than the corresponding American conservative \"whatevers\", which continue to exist--as they should--without these deletion challenges, which I see as completely POV based what is said in the deletion discussions.  +++$+++ *Lists and categories supplement each other, not replace each other.  Both can and do exist for the same subject area, as each has their own benefits and drawbacks.  Removing the political section of [[List of United States magazines]] and linking to a separate article is fine, but not sufficient.  No one maintaining the current list has seen fit to make the fine distinctions you propose.  The fact that a WP article (which is supposed to be supported by published fact) says that a magazine has a certain political stance is sufficient for me to put that article into a category: I use no other facts to put any any article into any category than what the article itself says.  The fact that American liberalism has many shades is not an argument that American liberalism does not exist and that American liberal "whatevers" (such as magazines) do not exist and should not be categorized as such--if it can be listed it can be categorized.  No different than the corresponding American conservative "whatevers", which continue to exist--as they should--without these deletion challenges, which I see as completely POV based what is said in the deletion discussions. [[User:Hmains|Hmains]] ([[User talk:Hmains|talk]]) 03:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

1645 +++$+++ Difluoroethene +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-21 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.308657960E09 +++$+++ I got your e-mail. I've been following the presidential election closely and wouldn't mind helping out. Who's the candidate you have in mind?  +++$+++ I got your e-mail. I've been following the presidential election closely and wouldn't mind helping out. Who's the candidate you have in mind? [[User:Difluoroethene|Difluoroethene]] ([[User talk:Difluoroethene|talk]]) 05:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
1646 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1645 +++$+++ 1645 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.308663900E09 +++$+++ I was referring to the Libertarian candidate R.J. Harris.  I just interviewed him for wikinews and he certainly is notable enough for a wikipedia page (and had one at [[RJ Harris (candidate)]] until it was redirected last year).  I could create the article myself though it may appear like a conflict of interest so soon after the interview.-- +++$+++ :I was referring to the Libertarian candidate R.J. Harris.  I just interviewed him for wikinews and he certainly is notable enough for a wikipedia page (and had one at [[RJ Harris (candidate)]] until it was redirected last year).  I could create the article myself though it may appear like a conflict of interest so soon after the interview.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 06:45, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
1647 +++$+++ Difluoroethene +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1645 +++$+++ 1646 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.308740400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know; I'll look into it soon. Best wishes,  +++$+++ ::Thanks for letting me know; I'll look into it soon. Best wishes, [[User:Difluoroethene|Difluoroethene]] ([[User talk:Difluoroethene|talk]]) 04:00, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

525934 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-09 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.147174680E09 +++$+++ I'll start from the Z's if you want to start from the A's??-- +++$+++ I'll start from the Z's if you want to start from the A's??--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 04:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
525935 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525934 +++$+++ 525934 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.147174920E09 +++$+++ Sounds good to me.  I put the first entry in as [[Dan Daly]].  Semper Fi! &mdash; +++$+++ * Sounds good to me.  I put the first entry in as [[Dan Daly]].  Semper Fi! &mdash;[[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] @ 04:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
525936 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525934 +++$+++ 525934 +++$+++ 2006-05-10 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.147328220E09 +++$+++ Re: [[Robert Edward Femoyer]] Though I'm familiar with how you've set up your MOH cats, I want to point out that Femoyer was in the Army Air Corps, not the Army.  It's always been my understanding (I used to hunt MOH imposters) that Air Corps MOH recipients fall under the Air Force, not the Army, for this purpose.  Please advise.  +++$+++ *Re: [[Robert Edward Femoyer]] Though I'm familiar with how you've set up your MOH cats, I want to point out that Femoyer was in the Army Air Corps, not the Army.  It's always been my understanding (I used to hunt MOH imposters) that Air Corps MOH recipients fall under the Air Force, not the Army, for this purpose.  Please advise. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 23:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
525937 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525934 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-10 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.147329480E09 +++$+++ Note, some Army sites claim the AF ones as \"Army\" but also generally list them separately aside from the regular Army ones as \"Air Service\" for WWI, \"Army Air Corps\/Force\" for WWII. So, there is some inter-service rivalry here. Now, if you're talking the USAF-specific design of the MOH that came out in 1960, then of course you're only talking Vietnam era recipients.  When I had my MOH web site, I listed pre-1960 ones as Air Force category, not Army ones as, after all, they were aerial combat, not Army.  FYI, I'm not AF, I was in the Navy, so I have no bone to pick here-;)  +++$+++ ***Note, some Army sites claim the AF ones as "Army" but also generally list them separately aside from the regular Army ones as "Air Service" for WWI, "Army Air Corps/Force" for WWII. So, there is some inter-service rivalry here. Now, if you're talking the USAF-specific design of the MOH that came out in 1960, then of course you're only talking Vietnam era recipients.  When I had my MOH web site, I listed pre-1960 ones as Air Force category, not Army ones as, after all, they were aerial combat, not Army.  FYI, I'm not AF, I was in the Navy, so I have no bone to pick here-;) [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 23:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
525938 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525934 +++$+++ 525934 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.147336800E09 +++$+++ To me, saying the USAAF was part of the Army is like saying the USMC is part of the Navy (it's not, it's part of the Dept. of the Navy).  This situation is similar, yet we don't say Marines in WWI are credited with being Navy MOH recipients.  A case can be made for either side, but I'd go with putting WWI\/WWII USAAF\/USAAC recipients in with the Air Force.  It's up to you as you're working those categories.  Just please let me know what you decide.  +++$+++ *To me, saying the USAAF was part of the Army is like saying the USMC is part of the Navy (it's not, it's part of the Dept. of the Navy).  This situation is similar, yet we don't say Marines in WWI are credited with being Navy MOH recipients.  A case can be made for either side, but I'd go with putting WWI/WWII USAAF/USAAC recipients in with the Air Force.  It's up to you as you're working those categories.  Just please let me know what you decide. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 01:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

1649 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-21 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.308707160E09 +++$+++ I'm not quite sure how alphabetizing the list of members and seperating out the inactive participants, several of them being retired, blocked or banned is a controversial edit but if you prefer it the way it is with yourself in the top slot then its ok with me. -- +++$+++ I'm not quite sure how alphabetizing the list of members and seperating out the inactive participants, several of them being retired, blocked or banned is a controversial edit but if you prefer it the way it is with yourself in the top slot then its ok with me. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 18:46, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
1650 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1649 +++$+++ 1649 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.308707520E09 +++$+++ I have no problem with separating \"inactive\" participants (though you are not a member and did not bother discuss it on the talk page). However, new members add their names to the bottom of the list. There's no good reason to alphabetize the list since it will inevitably cause more unnecessary work for others without any benefit.-- +++$+++ :I have no problem with separating "inactive" participants (though you are not a member and did not bother discuss it on the talk page). However, new members add their names to the bottom of the list. There's no good reason to alphabetize the list since it will inevitably cause more unnecessary work for others without any benefit.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 18:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
1651 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1649 +++$+++ 1650 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.308708060E09 +++$+++ No worries, a lot of us think it makes it easier to find names without having to read the whole list and seperating out the inactive and blocked ones helps to know who the active ones are so we don't waste time sending messages to folks that aint gonna see it. There was also one in there that never edited even one time so I'm not even sure how it got there in the first place. Either way its not a big deal to me though since as you stated I don't actively participate in the project (although I have edited quite a few of the articles in some capacity). I wasn't sure if the project was even active so that at least answers that question. Only about 200 more US related ones to verify still.:-) Happy editing. -- +++$+++ ::No worries, a lot of us think it makes it easier to find names without having to read the whole list and seperating out the inactive and blocked ones helps to know who the active ones are so we don't waste time sending messages to folks that aint gonna see it. There was also one in there that never edited even one time so I'm not even sure how it got there in the first place. Either way its not a big deal to me though since as you stated I don't actively participate in the project (although I have edited quite a few of the articles in some capacity). I wasn't sure if the project was even active so that at least answers that question. Only about 200 more US related ones to verify still.:-) Happy editing. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 19:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

263795 +++$+++ Marwatt +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-12 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.158055320E09 +++$+++ This is with reference to your message which you left on my talk page [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Marwatt] regarding following the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]]. Your point is well taken and noted for future reference. Thank you very much for your guidance. I usually or I should say never do that but when an anonymous editor (who seems to be [User: A M. Khan]) is blatantly telling lies and consistently vandalizing pages then I could not control myself but to ask him to provide sources for his preposterous assumptions. However, I assure you that I will be careful in future and follow the policy. --  +++$+++ This is with reference to your message which you left on my talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Marwatt] regarding following the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]]. Your point is well taken and noted for future reference. Thank you very much for your guidance. I usually or I should say never do that but when an anonymous editor (who seems to be [User: A M. Khan]) is blatantly telling lies and consistently vandalizing pages then I could not control myself but to ask him to provide sources for his preposterous assumptions. However, I assure you that I will be careful in future and follow the policy. -- [[User:Marwatt|Marwatt]] 03:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
263796 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263795 +++$+++ 263795 +++$+++ 2006-09-12 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.158065280E09 +++$+++ Thanks. The problem was that you were missing out an important step in the process meaning that the wider community couldn't see the debate!  +++$+++ :Thanks. The problem was that you were missing out an important step in the process meaning that the wider community couldn't see the debate! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 05:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

1652 +++$+++ JayJasper +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-21 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.308710940E09 +++$+++ ....for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:JayJasper&diff=435498642&oldid=435498351 reverting vandalism] on my user page.-- +++$+++ ....for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:JayJasper&diff=435498642&oldid=435498351 reverting vandalism] on my user page.--[[User:JayJasper|JayJasper]] ([[User talk:JayJasper|talk]]) 19:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
1653 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1652 +++$+++ 1652 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.308711360E09 +++$+++ No problem. I keep your page on my watchlist.-- +++$+++ :No problem. I keep your page on my watchlist.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 19:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

480873 +++$+++ IanManka +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-17 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.153201260E09 +++$+++ I'm back from Pittsburgh and have updated our games.  +++$+++ I'm back from Pittsburgh and have updated our games. [[User:IanManka|Ian Manka]] <small>[[User talk:IanManka|Talk to me!]]</small> 22:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
480874 +++$+++ IanManka +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480873 +++$+++ 480873 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.153455840E09 +++$+++ If you don't move shortly (24 hours), I'll have to forefeit you.  +++$+++ :If you don't move shortly (24 hours), I'll have to forefeit you. [[User:IanManka|Ian Manka]] <small>[[User talk:IanManka|Talk to me!]]</small> 21:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
480875 +++$+++ IanManka +++$+++ Fetofs +++$+++ 480873 +++$+++ 480874 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.154419980E09 +++$+++ I've responded in the \"rule change\" topic on the talk page. Take a look, if you so choose.  +++$+++ ::I've responded in the "rule change" topic on the talk page. Take a look, if you so choose. [[User:IanManka|Ian Manka]] <small>[[User talk:IanManka|Talk to me!]]</small> 01:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

1656 +++$+++ JakeInJoisey +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311287940E09 +++$+++ It's an interesting (I think anyway) debate that may have WP-wide relevancy & repurcussions and I've [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (words to watch)#\"Weasel Words\" - Caution or Prohibition?|solicited]] the MOS folks for some informed views. I thought you might be interested in a look-see. Rgds.  +++$+++ It's an interesting (I think anyway) debate that may have WP-wide relevancy & repurcussions and I've [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (words to watch)#"Weasel Words" - Caution or Prohibition?|solicited]] the MOS folks for some informed views. I thought you might be interested in a look-see. Rgds. [[User:JakeInJoisey|JakeInJoisey]] ([[User talk:JakeInJoisey|talk]]) 15:39, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
1657 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1656 +++$+++ 1656 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.311288900E09 +++$+++ The \"some commentators\" are clearly defined in the \"Commentary and criticism\" section. I disagree with the sentence's inclusion in the lead since it gives undue weight, but I will abide by consensus.-- +++$+++ :The "some commentators" are clearly defined in the "Commentary and criticism" section. I disagree with the sentence's inclusion in the lead since it gives undue weight, but I will abide by consensus.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 15:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

263801 +++$+++ The Mekon +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-15 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.158384180E09 +++$+++ I have left you a personal poem on your user page. There is no need to pay me for this service.  +++$+++ I have left you a personal poem on your user page. There is no need to pay me for this service. [[User:The Mekon|The Mekon]] 22:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
263802 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263801 +++$+++ 263801 +++$+++ 2006-09-15 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.158388200E09 +++$+++ lol. I'll keep that. hehe  +++$+++ :lol. I'll keep that. hehe [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
263803 +++$+++ The Mekon +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263801 +++$+++ 263802 +++$+++ 2006-09-15 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.158389460E09 +++$+++ Thank you for my return poem! It was excellent. +++$+++ ::Thank you for my return poem! It was excellent.[[User:The Mekon|The Mekon]] 23:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

1660 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312255320E09 +++$+++ I think you accidentally placed a comment indicating you have reviewed Agriculturalism  in the section about Thaddeus McCotter presidential campaign, 2012 (in DYK)--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ I think you accidentally placed a comment indicating you have reviewed Agriculturalism  in the section about Thaddeus McCotter presidential campaign, 2012 (in DYK)--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 20:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
1661 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1660 +++$+++ 1660 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312255920E09 +++$+++ No, I was fulfilling the [[Wikipedia:Did you know#Selection criteria|fifth requirement]].-- +++$+++ :No, I was fulfilling the [[Wikipedia:Did you know#Selection criteria|fifth requirement]].--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 20:32, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
1662 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1660 +++$+++ 1661 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312271160E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I'm not getting it. But I'll drop  it.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::Sorry, I'm not getting it. But I'll drop  it.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 00:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

1663 +++$+++ Rollins83 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1663 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.312490940E09 +++$+++ Hey, just wanted to say great job on creating content for [[Thaddeus McCotter presidential campaign, 2012]]. I had listed it on WP:USPE articles for creation list, and intended to get it started, but haven't the free time lately to do as much editing as I would like to. I logged in today prepared to start to working on it, only to find it was already filled in, and very well written and extensively sourced at that! I saw that you were the one who started the content and did the vast majority of the work. So thank you for your efforts and very well done.-- +++$+++ Hey, just wanted to say great job on creating content for [[Thaddeus McCotter presidential campaign, 2012]]. I had listed it on WP:USPE articles for creation list, and intended to get it started, but haven't the free time lately to do as much editing as I would like to. I logged in today prepared to start to working on it, only to find it was already filled in, and very well written and extensively sourced at that! I saw that you were the one who started the content and did the vast majority of the work. So thank you for your efforts and very well done.--[[User:Rollins83|Rollins83]] ([[User talk:Rollins83|talk]]) 13:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
1664 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ 1663 +++$+++ 1663 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.312496040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the comment.-- +++$+++ :Thanks for the comment.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn#top|talk]]) 15:14, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

525952 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-24 10:16:00 +++$+++ 1.148490960E09 +++$+++ Hi:  Let's use your page for this thread (I have a watch on it), that way we're not jumping back and forth.  Yes, I think your additions are positive. I drafted the Coker article and put it up for DYK, which it made.  I just moved the photo on top of the info box and the portal tag to the bottom.  The portal tag should be on the bottom.  The question is: does it look better with the photo or box on top.  Let me know what you think. I'll ask George about a military photo and permission to use it.   +++$+++ Hi:  Let's use your page for this thread (I have a watch on it), that way we're not jumping back and forth.  Yes, I think your additions are positive. I drafted the Coker article and put it up for DYK, which it made.  I just moved the photo on top of the info box and the portal tag to the bottom.  The portal tag should be on the bottom.  The question is: does it look better with the photo or box on top.  Let me know what you think. I'll ask George about a military photo and permission to use it.  [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 10:16, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
525953 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525952 +++$+++ 525952 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.148504940E09 +++$+++ George says this is okay.  I should get this done by Fri, maybe even today, Wed.  +++$+++ *George says this is okay.  I should get this done by Fri, maybe even today, Wed. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 14:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
525954 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525952 +++$+++ 525953 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.148544060E09 +++$+++ I've put up George's photo, taken just after his POW release.  I played around with photo and info box layout.  When I had the box near the top, it leaves a big blank spot on the left, so I moved it to the military section.  Feel free to test alternate layouts from the way I left it.   +++$+++ **I've put up George's photo, taken just after his POW release.  I played around with photo and info box layout.  When I had the box near the top, it leaves a big blank spot on the left, so I moved it to the military section.  Feel free to test alternate layouts from the way I left it.  [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 01:01, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
525955 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525952 +++$+++ 525953 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.148545860E09 +++$+++ &mdash; +++$+++ ::&mdash;[[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] @ 01:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

263809 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263809 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-19 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.158710280E09 +++$+++ To be honest, my interest in the category has had less to do with the issue you raised, and more to do with the way some people simultaneously apply that category, [[:Category:Radio comedy]], [[:Category:BBC radio programmes]], [[:Category:Radio programs]] and [[:Category:Radio]], ignoring or being unaware of Wikipedia's guidelines against duplicate categorization. But hey, whatever suits...I'm a firm believer that categories should be named as unambiguously as possible.  +++$+++ To be honest, my interest in the category has had less to do with the issue you raised, and more to do with the way some people simultaneously apply that category, [[:Category:Radio comedy]], [[:Category:BBC radio programmes]], [[:Category:Radio programs]] and [[:Category:Radio]], ignoring or being unaware of Wikipedia's guidelines against duplicate categorization. But hey, whatever suits...I'm a firm believer that categories should be named as unambiguously as possible. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 16:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
263810 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263809 +++$+++ 263809 +++$+++ 2006-09-19 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.158715200E09 +++$+++ Sure -- I've noticed that too. Today I removed the parent cats from BBC radio comedy. One user added them last week, but didn't bother correcting his mistake after you pointed it out to him.  +++$+++ :Sure -- I've noticed that too. Today I removed the parent cats from BBC radio comedy. One user added them last week, but didn't bother correcting his mistake after you pointed it out to him. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

263811 +++$+++ Ross-1989 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-20 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.158806880E09 +++$+++ Why are many images that do not have licensing, permission or edit summaries on Wikipedia accepted when these details are supposed to be required, then? I find it all a little confusing...-- +++$+++ Why are many images that do not have licensing, permission or edit summaries on Wikipedia accepted when these details are supposed to be required, then? I find it all a little confusing...--[[User:Ross-1989|Ross-1989]] 19:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
263812 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263811 +++$+++ 263811 +++$+++ 2006-09-20 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.158807000E09 +++$+++ Because there are more people uploading images than they are sorting them. They aren't accepted -- it's just they haven't been caught yet. If you find an image you think is similar to yours, then please let me know.  +++$+++ :Because there are more people uploading images than they are sorting them. They aren't accepted -- it's just they haven't been caught yet. If you find an image you think is similar to yours, then please let me know. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

262422 +++$+++ FeleciaQ +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-14 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.297745160E09 +++$+++ My topic is Urban politics in the United States It is just a stub right now and there seems to be only one source on the page now. +++$+++ My topic is Urban politics in the United States It is just a stub right now and there seems to be only one source on the page now.[[User:FeleciaQ|FeleciaQ]] ([[User talk:FeleciaQ|talk]]) 20:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
262423 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262422 +++$+++ 262422 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.297745700E09 +++$+++ Do you mean [[Urban politics in the United States]]? (Just making sure I have the right link!). If so, it's a nice little article to start on. Even though there's only one source, it's a reliable souce, with all of the information needed - it even has page numbers! There are so many articles I come across that only have part of the information for the source - sometimes just a book title and author last name, or a deadlinked bare url for a webref - that I have come to really appreciate it when people give all of the information for a reference. I've watchlisted the page, so if you have questions specifically about the article you can ask them on its talk page and I will answer there. The wikify tag can be removed after adding some more relevant links to the text of the article, while the orphan tag can be removed after getting the article linked in at least three other articles. I'll see what I can do about the latter in a bit. This isn't a subject that I'm familiar with, so I doubt I'll be much help with finding sources and the like, but I can hopefully still be of help with questions on formatting, reliable sourcing, etc.  +++$+++ :Do you mean [[Urban politics in the United States]]? (Just making sure I have the right link!). If so, it's a nice little article to start on. Even though there's only one source, it's a reliable souce, with all of the information needed - it even has page numbers! There are so many articles I come across that only have part of the information for the source - sometimes just a book title and author last name, or a deadlinked bare url for a webref - that I have come to really appreciate it when people give all of the information for a reference. I've watchlisted the page, so if you have questions specifically about the article you can ask them on its talk page and I will answer there. The wikify tag can be removed after adding some more relevant links to the text of the article, while the orphan tag can be removed after getting the article linked in at least three other articles. I'll see what I can do about the latter in a bit. This isn't a subject that I'm familiar with, so I doubt I'll be much help with finding sources and the like, but I can hopefully still be of help with questions on formatting, reliable sourcing, etc. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 20:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
262424 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262422 +++$+++ 262422 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.296680220E09 +++$+++ Replied on Pippa's page.  +++$+++ :Replied on Pippa's page. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 12:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
262425 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262422 +++$+++ 262424 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.296709980E09 +++$+++ I weighed in there as well.   +++$+++ ::I weighed in there as well.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 21:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

263815 +++$+++ 82.71.204.11 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-22 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.158967080E09 +++$+++ I think user [[User:Fluence|Fluence]] needs to be paid some attention. He is perhaps too young\/immature to be actively contributing. I refer you to [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/A_Heart_To_Hold_You|personal attacks]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Hopes and Fears DVD|more of the same]], [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Hopes_and_Fears_Tour|over-zealous behaviour]], [[User_talk:Painbearer#Avril_Lavigne|more of the same]], [[A_Heart_To_Hold_You|reverting the actions of deletion debates]], etc. etc.  +++$+++ I think user [[User:Fluence|Fluence]] needs to be paid some attention. He is perhaps too young/immature to be actively contributing. I refer you to [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/A_Heart_To_Hold_You|personal attacks]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hopes and Fears DVD|more of the same]], [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hopes_and_Fears_Tour|over-zealous behaviour]], [[User_talk:Painbearer#Avril_Lavigne|more of the same]], [[A_Heart_To_Hold_You|reverting the actions of deletion debates]], etc. etc. [[User:82.71.204.11|82.71.204.11]] 16:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
263816 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263815 +++$+++ 263815 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.159119300E09 +++$+++ Not pedantic. The list of episodes is now on its own page ([[List of This Life episodes]]), and we don't duplicate information. Quotes are unencyclopaedic: they are generally frowned upon by the Wikipedia community. Which quotes are chosed for selection is POV. IMDb is the place for quotes. An encyclopedia isn't.  +++$+++ :Not pedantic. The list of episodes is now on its own page ([[List of This Life episodes]]), and we don't duplicate information. Quotes are unencyclopaedic: they are generally frowned upon by the Wikipedia community. Which quotes are chosed for selection is POV. IMDb is the place for quotes. An encyclopedia isn't. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:35, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
263817 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263815 +++$+++ 263816 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.159119780E09 +++$+++ If the quotes are truly relevant than they should be written about, in prose, in context. That would be information. Yes, POV ''does'' matter: [[WP:NPOV]]. Whether you think it's pedantry or not is superfluous.  +++$+++ ::If the quotes are truly relevant than they should be written about, in prose, in context. That would be information. Yes, POV ''does'' matter: [[WP:NPOV]]. Whether you think it's pedantry or not is superfluous. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
263818 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263815 +++$+++ 263815 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.159139220E09 +++$+++ OK. Please sign your posts, and remember to specify the article to which you are referring.  +++$+++ :OK. Please sign your posts, and remember to specify the article to which you are referring. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

525961 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525961 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-27 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.148716200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message.  I checked out the article and sounds, great!  This weekend is a time to think about and remember all the heroes that have given their lives for our great country and for what we stand for.  May the lord bless you and your loved ones always.   +++$+++ Thanks for the message.  I checked out the article and sounds, great!  This weekend is a time to think about and remember all the heroes that have given their lives for our great country and for what we stand for.  May the lord bless you and your loved ones always.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
525962 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525961 +++$+++ 525961 +++$+++ 2006-05-27 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.148721240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the prayers.  I think that a link will be O.K.  Semper Fi  +++$+++ *Thanks for the prayers.  I think that a link will be O.K.  Semper Fi [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

1675 +++$+++ PC78 +++$+++ RalfiParpa +++$+++ 1675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-14 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.284451320E09 +++$+++ Any more regarding the \"Based on\" field? After my last comment more than a week ago I kinda felt like I left the ball in your court. Ultimately I support the field as long as we aren't ''too'' restrictive about how we use it or how we format it. Since there is at least agreement that it ''should'' be included, we could always just throw it in and quibble over the finer points of usage another time. Regards.  +++$+++ Any more regarding the "Based on" field? After my last comment more than a week ago I kinda felt like I left the ball in your court. Ultimately I support the field as long as we aren't ''too'' restrictive about how we use it or how we format it. Since there is at least agreement that it ''should'' be included, we could always just throw it in and quibble over the finer points of usage another time. Regards. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 01:02, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
1676 +++$+++ PC78 +++$+++ RalfiParpa +++$+++ 1675 +++$+++ 1675 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.285111740E09 +++$+++ Bump. No more on this? Having come so far it would be a shame to let this proposal fall by the wayside. Regards.  +++$+++ :Bump. No more on this? Having come so far it would be a shame to let this proposal fall by the wayside. Regards. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 16:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

43970 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 43970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-16 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.253138520E09 +++$+++ Could you please take another look at [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard#60_Minutes_and_the_Assassination_of_Werner_Erhard]]? ''' +++$+++ Could you please take another look at [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#60_Minutes_and_the_Assassination_of_Werner_Erhard]]? '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 15:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
43971 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 43970 +++$+++ 43970 +++$+++ 2009-09-17 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.253221380E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure what needs another look there. Are you asking me to reassess my opinion based upon later comments, or were you hoping for clarification of some of my general statements as they apply to the specific examples?  +++$+++ :I'm not sure what needs another look there. Are you asking me to reassess my opinion based upon later comments, or were you hoping for clarification of some of my general statements as they apply to the specific examples? [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] ([[User talk:DreamGuy#top|talk]]) 14:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
43972 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 43970 +++$+++ 43971 +++$+++ 2009-09-17 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.253225040E09 +++$+++ Nevermind, I think it's okay as there has been further input and extended comments from others that helps clarify things. Thanks though. :) Cheers, ''' +++$+++ ::Nevermind, I think it's okay as there has been further input and extended comments from others that helps clarify things. Thanks though. :) Cheers, '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 15:04, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

1678 +++$+++ Knownalias +++$+++ RalfiParpa +++$+++ 1678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-06 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.291676400E09 +++$+++ Each of the individual links to [[List of Walking Dead episodes|''The Walking Dead'' ratings]] leads to the individual pages where that rating appears.  When you combined the references to one, you left a link that led to the ratings for the pilot only.  You should only marry the references when an individual page\/article is being repeatedly used, not when a site\/source is used more than once.   +++$+++ Each of the individual links to [[List of Walking Dead episodes|''The Walking Dead'' ratings]] leads to the individual pages where that rating appears.  When you combined the references to one, you left a link that led to the ratings for the pilot only.  You should only marry the references when an individual page/article is being repeatedly used, not when a site/source is used more than once.  [[User:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Kristen ITC"; color:#23297A'>KnownAlias</span>]][[user talk:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Segoe script"; color:#614051'><small>  contact</small></span>]] 15:00, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
1679 +++$+++ Xeworlebi +++$+++ RalfiParpa +++$+++ 1678 +++$+++ 1678 +++$+++ 2010-12-06 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.291681020E09 +++$+++ That is incorrect, [http:\/\/tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com\/2010\/12\/05\/zombie-nation-will-the-walking-dead-ratings-hit-series-highs-in-tonights-season-one-finale\/74344 the reference] clearly has the ratings of the first five episodes in a nice table.&nbsp;<span style=\"font-family: Palatino;\"> +++$+++ :That is incorrect, [http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/12/05/zombie-nation-will-the-walking-dead-ratings-hit-series-highs-in-tonights-season-one-finale/74344 the reference] clearly has the ratings of the first five episodes in a nice table.&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Palatino;">[[User:Xeworlebi|'''<big><big><sub>X</sub></big></big>'''eworlebi]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Xeworlebi|talk]])</sup></span> 16:17, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
1680 +++$+++ Funkyvoltron +++$+++ RalfiParpa +++$+++ 1678 +++$+++ 1679 +++$+++ 2010-12-06 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.291686900E09 +++$+++ Did you actually check the reference, kind sir? My god.&ndash; +++$+++ ::Did you actually check the reference, kind sir? My god.&ndash;[[User:Funkyvoltron|FunkyVoltron]] <sup>[[User talk:Funkyvoltron|talk]]</sup> 17:55, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
1681 +++$+++ Knownalias +++$+++ RalfiParpa +++$+++ 1678 +++$+++ 1680 +++$+++ 2010-12-06 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.291687380E09 +++$+++ No, I'm afraid I didn't.  Lot going on on this end today; I'll leave it to the less distracted with my sincerest apologies.  +++$+++ :::No, I'm afraid I didn't.  Lot going on on this end today; I'll leave it to the less distracted with my sincerest apologies. [[User:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Kristen ITC"; color:#23297A'>KnownAlias</span>]][[user talk:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Segoe script"; color:#614051'><small>  contact</small></span>]] 18:03, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

549928 +++$+++ Ante Perkovic +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 549928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-05 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.149527460E09 +++$+++ Vidim da spominjes rijeke u Hrvatskoj. Na hrv. wikipeidji imas [[:hr:Popis rijeka u BiH]] (popis je kompletan, radjen prema vrlo detaljnoj karti), a [[:hr:Popis rijeka u Hrvatskoj]] je nedovrsen jer nedostaju rijeke u Slavoniji tj. sve istocno od Zagreba. Dalmacija, Istra, Lika i sve do Karlovca je popisano. -- +++$+++ Vidim da spominjes rijeke u Hrvatskoj. Na hrv. wikipeidji imas [[:hr:Popis rijeka u BiH]] (popis je kompletan, radjen prema vrlo detaljnoj karti), a [[:hr:Popis rijeka u Hrvatskoj]] je nedovrsen jer nedostaju rijeke u Slavoniji tj. sve istocno od Zagreba. Dalmacija, Istra, Lika i sve do Karlovca je popisano. --[[User:Ante Perkovic|Ante Perkovic]] 10:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
549929 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 549928 +++$+++ 549928 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.149530580E09 +++$+++ Hoho! Hvala ti puno za ovu informaciju, sada cu definitivno krenuti u sredjivanje nasih i Bosanskih rijeka na en Wikipediji... Hvala! -- +++$+++ : Hoho! Hvala ti puno za ovu informaciju, sada cu definitivno krenuti u sredjivanje nasih i Bosanskih rijeka na en Wikipediji... Hvala! --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 11:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
549930 +++$+++ Ante Perkovic +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 549928 +++$+++ 549929 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.149534660E09 +++$+++ Literatura: Karta Hrvatske i BiH 1: 500 000 :))). BiH je sredjena, a kod Hrvatske sam zapeo negdje kod Zagreba. Za svaki slucaj, ako zelis dovrsiti Hrvatsku, pocni od Save i idi prema sjeveru. Nabrojio sam dio uz Slovensku granicu, ali za svaki slucaj, da sto ne propustis, kreni od Save. Ako se sjetim gdje sam '''tocno''' stao, javim ti. -- +++$+++ :: Literatura: Karta Hrvatske i BiH 1: 500 000 :))). BiH je sredjena, a kod Hrvatske sam zapeo negdje kod Zagreba. Za svaki slucaj, ako zelis dovrsiti Hrvatsku, pocni od Save i idi prema sjeveru. Nabrojio sam dio uz Slovensku granicu, ali za svaki slucaj, da sto ne propustis, kreni od Save. Ako se sjetim gdje sam '''tocno''' stao, javim ti. --[[User:Ante Perkovic|Ante Perkovic]] 12:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

263827 +++$+++ Dean_randall +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263827 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-30 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.159670340E09 +++$+++ i got confused. I didn't create the image but i am involved with the band who created. As for the origins of the santa claus i'm afraid i don't know. All i know is that it is one of the prototype album covers for the charity christmas release. <span style=\"background-color:#99CC99;\">'''[[User:Dean randall| <font color=\"green\">DA<\/font><font color=\"yellow\">RR<\/font><font color=\"green\">]][[User:Dean_randall\/e|e]] +++$+++ i got confused. I didn't create the image but i am involved with the band who created. As for the origins of the santa claus i'm afraid i don't know. All i know is that it is one of the prototype album covers for the charity christmas release. <span style="background-color:#99CC99;">'''[[User:Dean randall| <font color="green">DA</font><font color="yellow">RR</font><font color="green">]][[User:Dean_randall/e|e]][[User:Dean randall|</font><font color="yellow">N</font>]]'''</span><sup>'''[[User talk:Dean_randall|<font color="blue">TALK</font>]]'''</sup> 19:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
263828 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263827 +++$+++ 263827 +++$+++ 2006-09-30 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.159670460E09 +++$+++ Well, if you don't know the source of theimage, it can't be used. You can't just modify an existing image, and then claim it as your own.  +++$+++ :Well, if you don't know the source of theimage, it can't be used. You can't just modify an existing image, and then claim it as your own. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

525974 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-04 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.149480660E09 +++$+++ Image rename and replacement, done!  Glad to help a friend anytime.   +++$+++ Image rename and replacement, done!  Glad to help a friend anytime.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 21:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
525975 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525974 +++$+++ 525974 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.149491640E09 +++$+++ I forgot to answer your question.  No, there isn't an official procedurem, you don't have to be an admin (note: I'm seriously considering you for nomination).  What you have to do is upload the image (or \"new\" version) again with the proper name.  Then you go to the article, delete the old version and replace it with the new version.  Finally, you go back to the \"old\" image and proceed to delete it and explain your reasons for doing so.  \"Ex: deleteing this version and replacing with a new version\".  Semper Fi  +++$+++ *I forgot to answer your question.  No, there isn't an official procedurem, you don't have to be an admin (note: I'm seriously considering you for nomination).  What you have to do is upload the image (or "new" version) again with the proper name.  Then you go to the article, delete the old version and replace it with the new version.  Finally, you go back to the "old" image and proceed to delete it and explain your reasons for doing so.  "Ex: deleteing this version and replacing with a new version".  Semper Fi [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
525976 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525974 +++$+++ 525975 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.149493980E09 +++$+++ It seems as if the delete button is an admin tool.  If you need that I delete an image, let me know.  If you are interested in becoming an admin, let me know also because I would consider it an honor to be your \"Godfather\" (nominator) and I believe that you have what it takes to be an excellent admin.   +++$+++ **It seems as if the delete button is an admin tool.  If you need that I delete an image, let me know.  If you are interested in becoming an admin, let me know also because I would consider it an honor to be your "Godfather" (nominator) and I believe that you have what it takes to be an excellent admin.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

1688 +++$+++ Michael Hardy +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-10 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.207881300E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you put an \"expert\" tag on [[F-test]] and I completely agree with that.  But I wonder if you can be specific about your concerns about [[order statistic]].  +++$+++ I noticed that you put an "expert" tag on [[F-test]] and I completely agree with that.  But I wonder if you can be specific about your concerns about [[order statistic]]. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 19:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
1689 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1688 +++$+++ 1688 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.207929180E09 +++$+++ OK, I have placed something on article talk page.  +++$+++ : OK, I have placed something on article talk page. [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe#top|talk]]) 08:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

1690 +++$+++ Encyclops +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-22 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.208912280E09 +++$+++ In my humble opinion, [[Statistical arbitrage]] is more within the scope of something like WP:WikiProject Finance than WP:WikiProject Statistics.  It is a topic in Finance (or Mathematical Finance) having some statistical aspects, rather than a mainstream Statistics topic.  +++$+++ In my humble opinion, [[Statistical arbitrage]] is more within the scope of something like WP:WikiProject Finance than WP:WikiProject Statistics.  It is a topic in Finance (or Mathematical Finance) having some statistical aspects, rather than a mainstream Statistics topic. [[User:Encyclops|Encyclops]] ([[User talk:Encyclops|talk]]) 17:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
1691 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1690 +++$+++ 1690 +++$+++ 2008-04-22 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.208912940E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Statistics#Things on boundary of scope]]. My thought was that [[Statistical arbitrage]] did involve some statistical thinking in setting up the method. At present WikiProject Statistics is trying to bring all articles on statistics topics into the list of statistical topics to provide a basis for further progress. You might want to look at the project page and consider joining.  +++$+++ :See [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Statistics#Things on boundary of scope]]. My thought was that [[Statistical arbitrage]] did involve some statistical thinking in setting up the method. At present WikiProject Statistics is trying to bring all articles on statistics topics into the list of statistical topics to provide a basis for further progress. You might want to look at the project page and consider joining. [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe#top|talk]]) 18:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

263835 +++$+++ Never Mystic +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-04 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.160019000E09 +++$+++ I'm still somewhat unfamiliar with the GA process; could you tell me how long an article is usually at the candidates page for? My understanding is that ones on hold take more time, but I'd appreciate it if you could verify the information. Here or my talk page is fine, thanks!  +++$+++ I'm still somewhat unfamiliar with the GA process; could you tell me how long an article is usually at the candidates page for? My understanding is that ones on hold take more time, but I'd appreciate it if you could verify the information. Here or my talk page is fine, thanks! [[User:Never Mystic|Never Mystic]] ([[User talk:Never Mystic|t]][[Special:Contributions/Never Mystic|c]]) 20:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
263836 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263835 +++$+++ 263835 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.160020320E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure, to be honest. I've only just begun dabbling in that myself. I think it's when someone familiar with that strand of articles happens to be patrolling the page. Probably a week, I guess... but, hey... the world's not going to end if it's a bit longer (I know how it feels waiting for an article you've put loads of work in to be assesed, tho')  +++$+++ :I'm not sure, to be honest. I've only just begun dabbling in that myself. I think it's when someone familiar with that strand of articles happens to be patrolling the page. Probably a week, I guess... but, hey... the world's not going to end if it's a bit longer (I know how it feels waiting for an article you've put loads of work in to be assesed, tho') [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
263837 +++$+++ Never Mystic +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263835 +++$+++ 263836 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.160028240E09 +++$+++ When someone like me, who's been editing Wikipedia for about a month, nominates an article to attain a specific status, I find it irritating to have to wait. At least now I know that the work takes time, so thanks! I'll be posting this on my talk page too (to retain the flow of the discussion).  +++$+++ ::When someone like me, who's been editing Wikipedia for about a month, nominates an article to attain a specific status, I find it irritating to have to wait. At least now I know that the work takes time, so thanks! I'll be posting this on my talk page too (to retain the flow of the discussion). [[User:Never Mystic|Never Mystic]] ([[User talk:Never Mystic|t]][[Special:Contributions/Never Mystic|c]]) 23:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

1693 +++$+++ Avraham +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1693 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-06 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.210109880E09 +++$+++ Hello. Can you please explain the reason for the change in category? Thanks! --  +++$+++ Hello. Can you please explain the reason for the change in category? Thanks! -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] ([[User talk:Avraham|talk]]) 14:38, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
1694 +++$+++ Avraham +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1693 +++$+++ 1693 +++$+++ 2008-05-06 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.210119600E09 +++$+++ Fair point. Thanks for taking the time to explain. --  +++$+++ :Fair point. Thanks for taking the time to explain. -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] ([[User talk:Avraham|talk]]) 17:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

1695 +++$+++ Grizthedog +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-13 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.213419000E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Grizthedog|Grizthedog]] ([[User talk:Grizthedog|talk]]) 21:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
1696 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1695 +++$+++ 1695 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 09:07:00 +++$+++ 1.213632420E09 +++$+++ You need to be more clear about what it is you want to construct. The most usual case is a confidence interval for the mean, in which case your formula would be wrong as you would need to divide the standard deviation of the sample by the square root of the sample size. If you want to find a confidence interval for a further observation from the same population, then your formula in approximately correct ... for modest same sizes you would need to multiply the sample standard deviation by the square root of (1+1\/N), where N is the sample size (you might find something about this in the article on \"tolerance intervals\" ). All this would  be making the usual assumptions, but your use of the word \"series\" might indicate that you have a \"time-series\" in which there might be serial correlation, in which case the assumptions would not hold.  +++$+++ :You need to be more clear about what it is you want to construct. The most usual case is a confidence interval for the mean, in which case your formula would be wrong as you would need to divide the standard deviation of the sample by the square root of the sample size. If you want to find a confidence interval for a further observation from the same population, then your formula in approximately correct ... for modest same sizes you would need to multiply the sample standard deviation by the square root of (1+1/N), where N is the sample size (you might find something about this in the article on "tolerance intervals" ). All this would  be making the usual assumptions, but your use of the word "series" might indicate that you have a "time-series" in which there might be serial correlation, in which case the assumptions would not hold. [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe#top|talk]]) 09:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

263841 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-18 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.161228300E09 +++$+++ I disagree that it's superfluous to link specific pages back to the disambiguation page.  What if I'm reading about the 1997 film and I want to know what other Titanic films have been made?  That's the easiest way to find out.  Now there's no link back to the dab page. - +++$+++ I disagree that it's superfluous to link specific pages back to the disambiguation page.  What if I'm reading about the 1997 film and I want to know what other Titanic films have been made?  That's the easiest way to find out.  Now there's no link back to the dab page. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 20:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
263842 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263841 +++$+++ 263841 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.161228720E09 +++$+++ Because if they want a more general page about Titanic, all they need to do is type Titanic into the search box, and they get the list of other articles. If it were difficult, then they would need the otheruses tag to hold their hand.  +++$+++ :Because if they want a more general page about Titanic, all they need to do is type Titanic into the search box, and they get the list of other articles. If it were difficult, then they would need the otheruses tag to hold their hand. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

525986 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525986 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-09 06:16:00 +++$+++ 1.149858960E09 +++$+++ If I am not around it is most likely because I was blocked.  Someone who has it in for me came and picked a fight at [[1st Battalion 4th Marines]] with the sole purpose of pushing my buttons and getting me blocked.  I have violated the 3RR, all in good faith, but to no avail.  Read the talk page for the drama.  It is stuff like this that has me seriously considering just leaving this site all together and taking up a more fruitful hobby.  You know where to get hold of me.== +++$+++ If I am not around it is most likely because I was blocked.  Someone who has it in for me came and picked a fight at [[1st Battalion 4th Marines]] with the sole purpose of pushing my buttons and getting me blocked.  I have violated the 3RR, all in good faith, but to no avail.  Read the talk page for the drama.  It is stuff like this that has me seriously considering just leaving this site all together and taking up a more fruitful hobby.  You know where to get hold of me.==[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 06:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
525987 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525986 +++$+++ 525986 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.150222620E09 +++$+++ Not a bad time to check that page. -- +++$+++ * Not a bad time to check that page. --[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 11:17, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
525988 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525986 +++$+++ 525987 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.150225980E09 +++$+++ I'd love to butt in here,...if that user is using multiple IPs as sockpuppetts, that can be reported and acted upon, even blocking all of them is possible.  Looper: Don't let him bait you like that. I know wiki can be very frutrating at times when buttheads like them arise, but take a break and come back when you've cooled off.   +++$+++ **I'd love to butt in here,...if that user is using multiple IPs as sockpuppetts, that can be reported and acted upon, even blocking all of them is possible.  Looper: Don't let him bait you like that. I know wiki can be very frutrating at times when buttheads like them arise, but take a break and come back when you've cooled off.  [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 12:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

263843 +++$+++ Mr.Mushnik +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263843 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-21 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.161466020E09 +++$+++ I'm rfeally not used to this sourcing thing and when i do, it's not good enough. The past Meat Loaf cd covers seem to be sourced well, but I don't know how to source my Meat Loaf Promoshots as Free. I scaned that one my self. <nowiki>[[Image:MLABATOUTOFHELL.jpg]]<\/nowiki> is sourced as best I can, how do you state it's Free? --  +++$+++ I'm rfeally not used to this sourcing thing and when i do, it's not good enough. The past Meat Loaf cd covers seem to be sourced well, but I don't know how to source my Meat Loaf Promoshots as Free. I scaned that one my self. <nowiki>[[Image:MLABATOUTOFHELL.jpg]]</nowiki> is sourced as best I can, how do you state it's Free? -- [[User:Mr.Mushnik|Mr.Mushnik]] 14:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
263844 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263843 +++$+++ 263843 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.161466740E09 +++$+++ You can't generally state it's free unless you are the person who took the photograph! Remember that owning a ''copy'' of the photograph is not the same as owning ''the'' image. We can only use promotional images when we ''know'' that it is part of a [[press kit]], and that the copyright holder allows the media to reproduce them.<br>Also, free images of Meat Loaf would be quite easy to obtain. He's still alive and makes a lot of public appearances.<br>Wikipedia is a (or \"the\") free encyclopedia. We should be using free content as much as possible.  +++$+++ :You can't generally state it's free unless you are the person who took the photograph! Remember that owning a ''copy'' of the photograph is not the same as owning ''the'' image. We can only use promotional images when we ''know'' that it is part of a [[press kit]], and that the copyright holder allows the media to reproduce them.<br>Also, free images of Meat Loaf would be quite easy to obtain. He's still alive and makes a lot of public appearances.<br>Wikipedia is a (or "the") free encyclopedia. We should be using free content as much as possible. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
263845 +++$+++ Mr.Mushnik +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263843 +++$+++ 263843 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.161468420E09 +++$+++ OK, If you take the photograph, how about a screenshot off a DVD? That's like taking your own photo. --  +++$+++ *OK, If you take the photograph, how about a screenshot off a DVD? That's like taking your own photo. -- [[User:Mr.Mushnik|Mr.Mushnik]] 15:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
263846 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263843 +++$+++ 263845 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.161474240E09 +++$+++ Nope. The amount of creativity, technical knowledge, expense is much less to you than if you'd taken it.  +++$+++ ::Nope. The amount of creativity, technical knowledge, expense is much less to you than if you'd taken it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

1700 +++$+++ 125.255.16.233 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1700 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-12 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.223840640E09 +++$+++ Jim [[Special:Contributions\/125.255.16.233|125.255.16.233]] ( +++$+++ Jim [[Special:Contributions/125.255.16.233|125.255.16.233]] ([[User talk:125.255.16.233|talk]]) 12:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
1701 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1700 +++$+++ 1700 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.224023280E09 +++$+++ Replied on article Talk page.  +++$+++ :Replied on article Talk page. [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe#top|talk]]) 15:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

43974 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 43974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-26 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.254003960E09 +++$+++ Just so you know, I have blocked this user indefinitely as his entire reason for editing Wikipedia seemed to be to harass you.  +++$+++ Just so you know, I have blocked this user indefinitely as his entire reason for editing Wikipedia seemed to be to harass you. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 15:26, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
43975 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 43974 +++$+++ 43974 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.254009060E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I suspect that account was probably a sock of some other user, but as long as the main account isn't doing similar behavior they would now know they can't get away with it that way.  +++$+++ :Thank you. I suspect that account was probably a sock of some other user, but as long as the main account isn't doing similar behavior they would now know they can't get away with it that way. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] ([[User talk:DreamGuy#top|talk]]) 16:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
43976 +++$+++ 2over0 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 43974 +++$+++ 43975 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.254043980E09 +++$+++ I just came here to ask if you had any idea whose obvious stinky sock that was, but I will leave it up to you if you feel like filing a [[WP:SPI]] or not. -  +++$+++ :: I just came here to ask if you had any idea whose obvious stinky sock that was, but I will leave it up to you if you feel like filing a [[WP:SPI]] or not. - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 02:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

263849 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-01 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.162415580E09 +++$+++ Could you please explain to me precisely why the trivium on Natalie Haynes' page was removed? - ''' +++$+++ Could you please explain to me precisely why the trivium on Natalie Haynes' page was removed? - '''[[User:Danbarnesdavies|D]][[WP:BRoy|<span style="color: #444488;">B</span>]][[User talk:Danbarnesdavies|D]]'''<sup>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Danbarnesdavies|R]]</sup> 13:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
263850 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263849 +++$+++ 263849 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.162424880E09 +++$+++ Sure. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Who she is friends with is not encyclopedic. See [[WP:TRIVIA]].  +++$+++ :Sure. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Who she is friends with is not encyclopedic. See [[WP:TRIVIA]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

1706 +++$+++ AlexAlex +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-17 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.237336800E09 +++$+++ Hi Melcombe, you were the last person improving [[Cook's distance]] page. There is still one symbol that I am not sure what exactly it means: '''<math>Y_{j(i)}<\/math>'''. Could you please add its description to the page? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Melcombe, you were the last person improving [[Cook's distance]] page. There is still one symbol that I am not sure what exactly it means: '''<math>Y_{j(i)}</math>'''. Could you please add its description to the page? Thanks, [[User:AlexAlex|Alex]] -- [[User talk:AlexAlex|talk]] 17:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
1707 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1706 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.237337520E09 +++$+++ I have added something.  +++$+++ ::I have added something. [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe#top|talk]]) 17:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
1708 +++$+++ AlexAlex +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1706 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.237859400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for both the fix and your remarks to me. +++$+++ :::Thanks for both the fix and your remarks to me.[[User:AlexAlex|Alex]] -- [[User talk:AlexAlex|talk]] 18:50, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

263851 +++$+++ Kghose +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-01 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.162425300E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Kghose|Kghose]] 15:55, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
263852 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263851 +++$+++ 263851 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.162425480E09 +++$+++ Thanks, though it's not always good netiquette to correct spelling, let alone point it out, in talk pages.  +++$+++ :Thanks, though it's not always good netiquette to correct spelling, let alone point it out, in talk pages. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
263853 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263851 +++$+++ 263851 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.162449420E09 +++$+++ Mmm, I'm quite confued. I can't remember blocking you... and if you were blocked you wouldn't have been able to post here anyway! Yes, if you create an account you're more likely to be safe.  +++$+++ :Mmm, I'm quite confued. I can't remember blocking you... and if you were blocked you wouldn't have been able to post here anyway! Yes, if you create an account you're more likely to be safe. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

1711 +++$+++ Stpasha +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1711 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-18 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.245388740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Stpasha|Stpasha]] ([[User talk:Stpasha|talk]]) 22:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
1712 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1711 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-25 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.245949740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe#top|talk]]) 10:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
1713 +++$+++ Kiefer.Wolfowitz +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1711 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.298363280E09 +++$+++ I saw this only now. MGF and Laplace transforms have advantages for exponential families and especially for maximum-likelihood estimation from such families~(Barndorff Nielsen). More broadly, Laplace transforms preserve positivity and analyticity, while Fourier tranforms and characteristic functions don't. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :::I saw this only now. MGF and Laplace transforms have advantages for exponential families and especially for maximum-likelihood estimation from such families~(Barndorff Nielsen). More broadly, Laplace transforms preserve positivity and analyticity, while Fourier tranforms and characteristic functions don't. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|<font style="color:blue;background:yellow;">&nbsp;'''Kiefer'''.'''Wolfowitz'''&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz#top|Discussion]]) 00:28, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

263857 +++$+++ Rskellner +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-11 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.163232840E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your help with the category section on the [[Jonatan Briel]]  article.  I should have spent more time checking the category possibilities.  Sorry you had to do my work for me, but I am grateful.  Thank you.  Scott  +++$+++ I appreciate your help with the category section on the [[Jonatan Briel]]  article.  I should have spent more time checking the category possibilities.  Sorry you had to do my work for me, but I am grateful.  Thank you.  Scott [[User:Rskellner|Rskellner]] 00:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
263858 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263857 +++$+++ 263857 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.163271000E09 +++$+++ Oh, not a problem!!  +++$+++ :Oh, not a problem!! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:50, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

263859 +++$+++ CaliforniaAliBaba +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263859 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.163321700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification.  +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification. [[User:CaliforniaAliBaba|cab]] 00:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
263860 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263859 +++$+++ 263859 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.163322840E09 +++$+++ I think common sense prevails. I wouldn't get into an edit war over the warnings -- I've only reinstated them once. Since there seems to be issues with this user, I felt it important to make editors aware when they go to his talk page. A colourful 'history' would do the same job.  +++$+++ :I think common sense prevails. I wouldn't get into an edit war over the warnings -- I've only reinstated them once. Since there seems to be issues with this user, I felt it important to make editors aware when they go to his talk page. A colourful 'history' would do the same job. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 01:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
263861 +++$+++ Fasach Nua +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263859 +++$+++ 263859 +++$+++ 2006-11-13 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.163467080E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ :Thanks, [[User:Fasach Nua|Fasach Nua]] 17:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
263862 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263859 +++$+++ 263861 +++$+++ 2006-11-13 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.163468340E09 +++$+++ Sure. There have been many, many graduates. We can use common sense to narrow them down to 'notable' (prime ministers, infamous mass murderes...). But then whose photograph(s) do we select for inclusion? We can't include photographs for all of them, and it seems POV that we have some but not others.  +++$+++ ::Sure. There have been many, many graduates. We can use common sense to narrow them down to 'notable' (prime ministers, infamous mass murderes...). But then whose photograph(s) do we select for inclusion? We can't include photographs for all of them, and it seems POV that we have some but not others. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

526004 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-15 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.150360560E09 +++$+++ Hey, that's interesting about Vargas.  Thanks for letting me know.  You know there is one Marine that I have to write about.  He was Sgt. Alexander Joseph Foley.  Sgt. Foley was awarded the Medal of Honor during the Boxer Rebelion.  Now the thing that really calls my attention isn't that he got drunk and died because of an accident but, the fact that he is buried in the Puerto Rican island of Culebra.  I have got to investigate why is it that his family did not claim the body of thus American heroe.   I'm slowly making some changes to the Pedro del Valle article.   +++$+++ Hey, that's interesting about Vargas.  Thanks for letting me know.  You know there is one Marine that I have to write about.  He was Sgt. Alexander Joseph Foley.  Sgt. Foley was awarded the Medal of Honor during the Boxer Rebelion.  Now the thing that really calls my attention isn't that he got drunk and died because of an accident but, the fact that he is buried in the Puerto Rican island of Culebra.  I have got to investigate why is it that his family did not claim the body of thus American heroe.   I'm slowly making some changes to the Pedro del Valle article.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
526005 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526004 +++$+++ 526004 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.150362360E09 +++$+++ Thanks, now you see, this dosen't make any sense to me \"Because it was not practical at that time to ship his body home\".  There still must be a reason that his family (if he had any) didn't claim his body or at least his hometown, Phillie should have done so.  Instead he is buried in this small which most people have never heard of.  Interesting huh?   +++$+++ *Thanks, now you see, this dosen't make any sense to me "Because it was not practical at that time to ship his body home".  There still must be a reason that his family (if he had any) didn't claim his body or at least his hometown, Phillie should have done so.  Instead he is buried in this small which most people have never heard of.  Interesting huh?  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

1719 +++$+++ Zven +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-24 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.253807160E09 +++$+++ Your revert of my edits seem to be a bit hasty, not only are you incorrect in your summary ''later edits incorrectly changed meaning & number was correct as prob was for either 3 heads or three tails'' which clearly none of my revisions altered (see my [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Null_hypothesis&diff=315859159&oldid=315758658 diffs]), but you have reverted my correction for the probability of 3 heads or tails which is 0.5*0.5*0.5 = 1\/8 or an eighth not a quarter. -- +++$+++ Your revert of my edits seem to be a bit hasty, not only are you incorrect in your summary ''later edits incorrectly changed meaning & number was correct as prob was for either 3 heads or three tails'' which clearly none of my revisions altered (see my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Null_hypothesis&diff=315859159&oldid=315758658 diffs]), but you have reverted my correction for the probability of 3 heads or tails which is 0.5*0.5*0.5 = 1/8 or an eighth not a quarter. --[[User:Zven|Zven]] ([[User talk:Zven|talk]]) 08:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
1720 +++$+++ Zven +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1719 +++$+++ 1719 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.253807820E09 +++$+++ Right I now see what you are getting at, however you also reverted my other edits which probably didn't need to go. -- +++$+++ :Right I now see what you are getting at, however you also reverted my other edits which probably didn't need to go. --[[User:Zven|Zven]] ([[User talk:Zven|talk]]) 08:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
1721 +++$+++ Zven +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1719 +++$+++ 1720 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 09:01:00 +++$+++ 1.253808060E09 +++$+++ Actually, the example is misleading, no wonder there is so much confusion, it states a two headed coin, so three tails is not an outcome at all, only three heads. -- +++$+++ ::Actually, the example is misleading, no wonder there is so much confusion, it states a two headed coin, so three tails is not an outcome at all, only three heads. --[[User:Zven|Zven]] ([[User talk:Zven|talk]]) 09:01, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

263864 +++$+++ Majorly +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263864 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.163640840E09 +++$+++ According to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMajorly%2FArchives%2FSep_2006&diff=74373187&oldid=74362736 this], they aren't the real names... --<font color=\"002bb8\"> +++$+++ According to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMajorly%2FArchives%2FSep_2006&diff=74373187&oldid=74362736 this], they aren't the real names... --<font color="002bb8">[[User:Majorly|Majorly]]</font> (<font color="002bb8">[[User talk:Majorly|Talk]]</font>) 17:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
263865 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263864 +++$+++ 263864 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.163650140E09 +++$+++ Ah, cool. Probably a good idea to put fake details, as a diversion...  +++$+++ :Ah, cool. Probably a good idea to put fake details, as a diversion... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

263866 +++$+++ Fred-stine +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.163725140E09 +++$+++ Thankyou +++$+++ Thankyou[[User:Fred-stine|Fred-stine]] 16:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
263867 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263866 +++$+++ 263866 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.163725980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your message. I have explained why some your contrubtions are unsuitable. I have today removed unencylopedic information from the Quint page, speciifcally the 'Quotes' section. My advice is to live and learn, and read the policies that experienecd editors point you towards when you make mistakes.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your message. I have explained why some your contrubtions are unsuitable. I have today removed unencylopedic information from the Quint page, speciifcally the 'Quotes' section. My advice is to live and learn, and read the policies that experienecd editors point you towards when you make mistakes. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
263868 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263866 +++$+++ 263866 +++$+++ 2006-11-19 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.163963700E09 +++$+++ Therefore everything that goes in that artcile should be accurately sourced. If we can say that x in y newspaper said z, and here's the URL... that would be fine.  +++$+++ :Therefore everything that goes in that artcile should be accurately sourced. If we can say that x in y newspaper said z, and here's the URL... that would be fine. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
263869 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263866 +++$+++ 263866 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.164010800E09 +++$+++ You have the right to post, but you must do that within the rules and conventions of Wikipedia. Much of what you wish to add is unacceptable. I have explained this above. Some of what you have added tonight could be acceptable: I have rewritten it slightly. Wikipedia is not a forum. It is not a place for opinions. Even the section you've added tonight does not have a source. See the rest of teh articl of how to do this correctly.  +++$+++ :You have the right to post, but you must do that within the rules and conventions of Wikipedia. Much of what you wish to add is unacceptable. I have explained this above. Some of what you have added tonight could be acceptable: I have rewritten it slightly. Wikipedia is not a forum. It is not a place for opinions. Even the section you've added tonight does not have a source. See the rest of teh articl of how to do this correctly. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 00:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

526013 +++$+++ Rmt2m +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-21 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.150925820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for continuing to look over the article.  Do you know or do you know anyone that knows anything about the [[Burma Campaign]] or the [[Battle of the Aleutian Islands]]?   +++$+++ Thanks for continuing to look over the article.  Do you know or do you know anyone that knows anything about the [[Burma Campaign]] or the [[Battle of the Aleutian Islands]]?  [[User:Rmt2m|Rmt2m]] 14:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
526014 +++$+++ Rmt2m +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526013 +++$+++ 526013 +++$+++ 2006-06-22 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.150968060E09 +++$+++ Ok thanks I'll give it a try.   +++$+++ :Ok thanks I'll give it a try.  [[User:Rmt2m|Rmt2m]] 02:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
526015 +++$+++ Rmt2m +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526013 +++$+++ 526014 +++$+++ 2006-06-22 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.151014620E09 +++$+++ Dang it, I've got one of those, \"Hiroshima and Nagasaki was terrorism\" people messing with the article now.   +++$+++ ::Dang it, I've got one of those, "Hiroshima and Nagasaki was terrorism" people messing with the article now.  [[User:Rmt2m|Rmt2m]] 15:17, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

1726 +++$+++ Stpasha +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1726 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-19 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.263956100E09 +++$+++ The main reason why we had 2-column infobox is because readers were frequently confused when they seen apparent discrepancies between the article and their textbooks. Such confusion can be avoided either by bloating the infobox (and actually there are more than 2 possible definitions), or by including a very noticeable alertbox, warning about potential discrepancies when comparing this info to existing textbooks, which is the way we are dealing with the problem right now. <font color=\"#aaa\">\xa0\u2026\xa0<b> +++$+++ The main reason why we had 2-column infobox is because readers were frequently confused when they seen apparent discrepancies between the article and their textbooks. Such confusion can be avoided either by bloating the infobox (and actually there are more than 2 possible definitions), or by including a very noticeable alertbox, warning about potential discrepancies when comparing this info to existing textbooks, which is the way we are dealing with the problem right now. <font color="#aaa"> … <b>[[User talk:Stpasha|<font color="#888">st</font><font color="#000">pasha</font>]]</b> » </font> 18:55, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
1727 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1726 +++$+++ 1726 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 10:28:00 +++$+++ 1.264012080E09 +++$+++ See [[User talk:Stpasha]] for reply.  +++$+++ :See [[User talk:Stpasha]] for reply. [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe#top|talk]]) 10:28, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

1728 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-20 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.264029480E09 +++$+++ Hi Melcombe, please see [[talk:Sigma-algebra#Too technical?]], thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Melcombe, please see [[talk:Sigma-algebra#Too technical?]], thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:18, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
1729 +++$+++ CBM +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1728 +++$+++ 1728 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.264047600E09 +++$+++ Just my 2p: the {{tl|context}} template is a lot more self-explanatory (to me at least) for an article where the lede needs to be expanded to explain what the topic is about. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>( +++$+++ :Just my 2p: the {{tl|context}} template is a lot more self-explanatory (to me at least) for an article where the lede needs to be expanded to explain what the topic is about. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 20:20, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

526019 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526019 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-25 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.151299260E09 +++$+++ Wow, I didn't realize that you posted those images, I'm sorry.  If you like I will revert to your version to keep the info boxes within uniform and maybe insert the accurate images in some part of the article.  It's your call and I will respect your decision.  Semper Fi  +++$+++ Wow, I didn't realize that you posted those images, I'm sorry.  If you like I will revert to your version to keep the info boxes within uniform and maybe insert the accurate images in some part of the article.  It's your call and I will respect your decision.  Semper Fi [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 22:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
526020 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526019 +++$+++ 526019 +++$+++ 2006-06-25 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.151303940E09 +++$+++ I agree.   +++$+++ * I agree.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

263877 +++$+++ Mavarin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-26 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.164610980E09 +++$+++ Also, I just wrote a long, polite reply to someone who was angry with me for moving most of his long, disorganized, unsourced trivia section on ''[[A Christmas Story]]'' to other sections, and deleting the rest as either nn or repeating what is stated elsewhere. I don't know whether you are familiar with the film - one anon trivia adder claimed last week that it has not \"crossed the pond\" - but I could use some advice and support for the idea that such edits are appropriate, and that a large, indiscriminate trivia section is not. This person has just re-added his or her trivia section and basically undone about six hours of work on my part. Any chance you could take a look?  Thanks.  +++$+++ Also, I just wrote a long, polite reply to someone who was angry with me for moving most of his long, disorganized, unsourced trivia section on ''[[A Christmas Story]]'' to other sections, and deleting the rest as either nn or repeating what is stated elsewhere. I don't know whether you are familiar with the film - one anon trivia adder claimed last week that it has not "crossed the pond" - but I could use some advice and support for the idea that such edits are appropriate, and that a large, indiscriminate trivia section is not. This person has just re-added his or her trivia section and basically undone about six hours of work on my part. Any chance you could take a look?  Thanks. [[User:Mavarin|Karen]] | [[User talk:Mavarin|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Mavarin|contribs]] 23:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
263878 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.164614580E09 +++$+++ I'll keep an eye on it. I've reverted back to your last edit and left a note on the talk page. Is there a specific bit you can point me to where you're having trouble?  +++$+++ :I'll keep an eye on it. I've reverted back to your last edit and left a note on the talk page. Is there a specific bit you can point me to where you're having trouble? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 00:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
263879 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ 263878 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.164615900E09 +++$+++ Oh, I think I see where you were having trouble. The cite template should go next to the actual text, not entered directly into the 'references' section.  +++$+++ ::Oh, I think I see where you were having trouble. The cite template should go next to the actual text, not entered directly into the 'references' section. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 00:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
263880 +++$+++ Mavarin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ 263878 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.164616380E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much!  No, that's not the problem. I was trying to do it inline, but with poor results. You fixed one of my cites just now, the Hammond one in [[A Christmas Story]]. I've tried copying the template and inserting the info, but it appears unhidden in the text itself unless I add the ref part. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=A_Christmas_Story&oldid=90292777] Here's another one, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Peanuts_in_popular_culture#In_television], and there may be one or two others elsewhere I've messed up. Maybe if I learn to always do the ref footnote thingy it will work out better. Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::Thank you very much!  No, that's not the problem. I was trying to do it inline, but with poor results. You fixed one of my cites just now, the Hammond one in [[A Christmas Story]]. I've tried copying the template and inserting the info, but it appears unhidden in the text itself unless I add the ref part. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Christmas_Story&oldid=90292777] Here's another one, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peanuts_in_popular_culture#In_television], and there may be one or two others elsewhere I've messed up. Maybe if I learn to always do the ref footnote thingy it will work out better. Thanks again. [[User:Mavarin|Karen]] | [[User talk:Mavarin|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Mavarin|contribs]] 00:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
263881 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.164676680E09 +++$+++ No worries. The decision will be by another admin based upon the discssion. Take it easy.  +++$+++ :No worries. The decision will be by another admin based upon the discssion. Take it easy. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
263882 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.164735000E09 +++$+++ I will continue to remove inappropriate additions, such as \"only time will tell.\" If you add things appropriate to an encyclopedia, that is fine. If you add opinion, or anything in an informal tone, I will revert. Your recent addition is inappropriate, so [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bat_out_of_Hell_III:_The_Monster_Is_Loose&diff=next&oldid=90617357 I have reverted] and will continue to do so. Please do not make personal comments about other users, especially ones which could be very easily be deflected back upon you. The fact that you use the phrase \"stick up for Meat Loaf's new CD\" suggests that you have a POV characteristic of a certain forum.  +++$+++ :I will continue to remove inappropriate additions, such as "only time will tell." If you add things appropriate to an encyclopedia, that is fine. If you add opinion, or anything in an informal tone, I will revert. Your recent addition is inappropriate, so [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bat_out_of_Hell_III:_The_Monster_Is_Loose&diff=next&oldid=90617357 I have reverted] and will continue to do so. Please do not make personal comments about other users, especially ones which could be very easily be deflected back upon you. The fact that you use the phrase "stick up for Meat Loaf's new CD" suggests that you have a POV characteristic of a certain forum. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
263883 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.164774120E09 +++$+++ Mmmm, I'm not quite sure which Billboard reference I deleted. It is unlikley that I have removed verifiable, objective, sourced information. If you can provide a specific difference, then I'd be happy to review it.  +++$+++ :Mmmm, I'm not quite sure which Billboard reference I deleted. It is unlikley that I have removed verifiable, objective, sourced information. If you can provide a specific difference, then I'd be happy to review it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
263884 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ 263877 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.164763680E09 +++$+++ I've already given you my decision. Please stop putting all that stuff on my talk page. Thanks.  +++$+++ :I've already given you my decision. Please stop putting all that stuff on my talk page. Thanks. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

1736 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-10 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.268256600E09 +++$+++ Hi, I saw that you edit stats pages. Is there an ambulance\/ER type list for articles in real trouble, e.g. [[Random sequence]] is in bad shape, [[Statistical randomness]] is barely ok, but has errors, and both are almost reference free. [[Applications of randomness]] probably wins the worst article award and [[Randomness]] is no gem either. Is there a \"help needed\" list somewhere? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, I saw that you edit stats pages. Is there an ambulance/ER type list for articles in real trouble, e.g. [[Random sequence]] is in bad shape, [[Statistical randomness]] is barely ok, but has errors, and both are almost reference free. [[Applications of randomness]] probably wins the worst article award and [[Randomness]] is no gem either. Is there a "help needed" list somewhere? Thanks. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 13:30, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
1737 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1736 +++$+++ 1736 +++$+++ 2010-03-10 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.268267700E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I think I will just add the templates on the pages. These pages are not my priority, I was just amazed how low quality they all are - compared with info on Paris Hilton that gets great attention in Wikipedia. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks, I think I will just add the templates on the pages. These pages are not my priority, I was just amazed how low quality they all are - compared with info on Paris Hilton that gets great attention in Wikipedia. Thanks. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 16:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

87671 +++$+++ Mtstroud +++$+++ Mtstroud +++$+++ 87671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-07 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.218103260E09 +++$+++ There is nothing particularly historically significant about Ward Church that merits its being included as a unique example of an EPC congregation. By that, I mean that it is obscure to a vast majority, if not all, readers, unlike, say, the National Presbyterian Church in Washington. In other words, singling out that particular church has far less of a rationale than does my deleting it. +++$+++ There is nothing particularly historically significant about Ward Church that merits its being included as a unique example of an EPC congregation. By that, I mean that it is obscure to a vast majority, if not all, readers, unlike, say, the National Presbyterian Church in Washington. In other words, singling out that particular church has far less of a rationale than does my deleting it.[[User:Mtstroud|Mike]] ([[User talk:Mtstroud#top|talk]]) 03:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
87672 +++$+++ davidwr +++$+++ Mtstroud +++$+++ 87671 +++$+++ 87671 +++$+++ 2008-08-07 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.218103380E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, when you restore the edit add what you just said to the article talk page and put a shorter version in the edit history.   +++$+++ :Fair enough, when you restore the edit add what you just said to the article talk page and put a shorter version in the edit history.  [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])/([[Special:Emailuser/davidwr|e-mail]])</small></small> 03:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

393506 +++$+++ Chris 73 +++$+++ PaulWicks +++$+++ 393506 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-15 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.160949720E09 +++$+++ try reload, the images are looking <s>fine<\/s> ... i mean I can see em all right --  +++$+++ try reload, the images are looking <s>fine</s> ... i mean I can see em all right -- [[User:Chris 73|Chris 73]] | [[User talk:Chris 73|Talk]] 15:02, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
393507 +++$+++ Chris 73 +++$+++ PaulWicks +++$+++ 393506 +++$+++ 393506 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.160959200E09 +++$+++ Have you tried refreshing the cache? (CTRL F5 in IE)--  +++$+++ :Have you tried refreshing the cache? (CTRL F5 in IE)-- [[User:Chris 73|Chris 73]] | [[User talk:Chris 73|Talk]] 17:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
393508 +++$+++ Chris 73 +++$+++ PaulWicks +++$+++ 393506 +++$+++ 393507 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.160971980E09 +++$+++ Then I don't known. It is still displaying all right for me. Have you tried a different computer? Updated Firefox? Do you have an advertising-blocker that could block the image? Just some random guesses. Good Luck --  +++$+++ ::Then I don't known. It is still displaying all right for me. Have you tried a different computer? Updated Firefox? Do you have an advertising-blocker that could block the image? Just some random guesses. Good Luck -- [[User:Chris 73|Chris 73]] | [[User talk:Chris 73|Talk]] 21:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

526030 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-05 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.152083940E09 +++$+++ I got the bug to remove all of the red links on the page for [[Steven W. Lindsey]].  He is the current shuttle commander and deserves a decent looking page.  I also find that doing article on other services breaks things up a bit like the [[Valiant Shield]] page.  I am about to finish the 12th TRS page but thought I'd throw it out there to see if you would be interested.-- +++$+++ I got the bug to remove all of the red links on the page for [[Steven W. Lindsey]].  He is the current shuttle commander and deserves a decent looking page.  I also find that doing article on other services breaks things up a bit like the [[Valiant Shield]] page.  I am about to finish the 12th TRS page but thought I'd throw it out there to see if you would be interested.--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 00:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
526031 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526030 +++$+++ 526030 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.152088020E09 +++$+++ At first glance, I think the article is a bit overlinked, which results in a lot of redlinks. My first impression &mdash; the redlinks are outside of my area of expertise.  I'll see if there are any I can take on.  (Don't hold your breath. :-)  Thanks for the advice on breaking things up.  With the recent milestone achieved, I'm planning on taking a little break &mdash; which is good timing as RL is heating up.  I put in some blanks for next month's coordination, plus and idea for next July 4. &mdash;  +++$+++ * At first glance, I think the article is a bit overlinked, which results in a lot of redlinks. My first impression &mdash; the redlinks are outside of my area of expertise.  I'll see if there are any I can take on.  (Don't hold your breath. :-)  Thanks for the advice on breaking things up.  With the recent milestone achieved, I'm planning on taking a little break &mdash; which is good timing as RL is heating up.  I put in some blanks for next month's coordination, plus and idea for next July 4. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 01:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
526032 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526030 +++$+++ 526031 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.152088740E09 +++$+++ OK, [[:AERCam Sprint]] stub.  But, fireworks call. &mdash;  +++$+++ ** OK, [[:AERCam Sprint]] stub.  But, fireworks call. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 01:39, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

263887 +++$+++ TruthbringerToronto +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-04 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.165225020E09 +++$+++ I realize that [[Jack Brittingham]] was a weak article, but the host of a show on [[The Outdoor Channel]] is probably notable. I added some references to the article and removed some extraneous text. -- +++$+++ I realize that [[Jack Brittingham]] was a weak article, but the host of a show on [[The Outdoor Channel]] is probably notable. I added some references to the article and removed some extraneous text. --[[User:TruthbringerToronto|TruthbringerToronto]] ([[User_talk:TruthbringerToronto|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TruthbringerToronto|contribs)]] 01:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
263888 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263887 +++$+++ 263887 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.165250760E09 +++$+++ It looks much more convincing now that it's cleaned up. Well done.  +++$+++ :It looks much more convincing now that it's cleaned up. Well done. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

263889 +++$+++ Mavarin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-04 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.165301640E09 +++$+++ Hi again.  Could you please take a moment to look at the contribs by new user Mwarner94? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Mwarner94] I can't figure out whether they're vandalism or just cluelessness. I'm reverting the Charlie Brown one, but I don't really want to get involved in following this person around to articles outside my areas of interest.  Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi again.  Could you please take a moment to look at the contribs by new user Mwarner94? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mwarner94] I can't figure out whether they're vandalism or just cluelessness. I'm reverting the Charlie Brown one, but I don't really want to get involved in following this person around to articles outside my areas of interest.  Thanks! [[User:Mavarin|Karen]] | [[User talk:Mavarin|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Mavarin|contribs]] 22:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
263890 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263889 +++$+++ 263889 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.165302840E09 +++$+++ mmm, a clueless newbie, I think. We can keep an eye on the account... Perhaps the welcome messages someone's left will do some good.  +++$+++ :mmm, a clueless newbie, I think. We can keep an eye on the account... Perhaps the welcome messages someone's left will do some good. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

1746 +++$+++ Vergnetp +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-24 08:40:00 +++$+++ 1.277394000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Vergnetp|Vergnetp]] ([[User talk:Vergnetp|talk]]) 08:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
1747 +++$+++ Kiefer.Wolfowitz +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1746 +++$+++ 1746 +++$+++ 2010-07-10 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.278799560E09 +++$+++ It would be appropriate to put experiments under \"mathematical methods\" or \"statistical methods\", which are wider categories than \"quantitative methods\". Bets regards ,  +++$+++ : It would be appropriate to put experiments under "mathematical methods" or "statistical methods", which are wider categories than "quantitative methods". Bets regards , [[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|Kiefer.Wolfowitz]] ([[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|talk]]) 15:06, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
1748 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1746 +++$+++ 1746 +++$+++ 2010-07-15 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.279232940E09 +++$+++ I don't know. I merely copied a formula from one of the papers that were cited but which no longer seem to be available online. There may a problem with know which version of variance to use (divided by N or N-1). You might try contacting the oroginal author of the article.  +++$+++ :I don't know. I merely copied a formula from one of the papers that were cited but which no longer seem to be available online. There may a problem with know which version of variance to use (divided by N or N-1). You might try contacting the oroginal author of the article. [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe#top|talk]]) 15:29, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

263891 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263891 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-07 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.165557060E09 +++$+++ Hi - I agree that it seems very similar (though I think the start of the issue was before my time as admin, so I'm not sure of the history - just everything since Sunderland (and the bot account)).  To be honest, I'm jsut going to keep an eye on both accounts now - my only concern is that we'll end up with about a dozen socks to block in a couple of weeks - hopefully not!  Thanks <strong>[[User:Martinp23|M]] +++$+++ Hi - I agree that it seems very similar (though I think the start of the issue was before my time as admin, so I'm not sure of the history - just everything since Sunderland (and the bot account)).  To be honest, I'm jsut going to keep an eye on both accounts now - my only concern is that we'll end up with about a dozen socks to block in a couple of weeks - hopefully not!  Thanks <strong>[[User:Martinp23|M]][[User:Martinp23/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User_talk:Martinp23|rtinp23]]</strong> 21:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
263892 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263891 +++$+++ 263891 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.165557240E09 +++$+++ Yeah... it was only after that I had left the message on your talk page that I noticed his earlier message admitting to being the same person... If he's turned genuine, great... if not, the small amount of vandalism can be corrected pretty quickly. It takes much less effort for us to revert than it does for him to create dozens of accounts so an article can be vandalised for a couple of minutes.  +++$+++ :Yeah... it was only after that I had left the message on your talk page that I noticed his earlier message admitting to being the same person... If he's turned genuine, great... if not, the small amount of vandalism can be corrected pretty quickly. It takes much less effort for us to revert than it does for him to create dozens of accounts so an article can be vandalised for a couple of minutes. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
263893 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263891 +++$+++ 263892 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.165639800E09 +++$+++ I disagree that \"is important that the entry illustrate and highlight the differences in departments that incorporate Media studies in their work.\" It will begin to turn into a list of departments with some trying to gain some headway over the other. We discussed this last year when there were several external links to specific centres.  +++$+++ ::I disagree that "is important that the entry illustrate and highlight the differences in departments that incorporate Media studies in their work." It will begin to turn into a list of departments with some trying to gain some headway over the other. We discussed this last year when there were several external links to specific centres. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
263894 +++$+++ Jstalker +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263891 +++$+++ 263893 +++$+++ 2006-12-22 08:16:00 +++$+++ 1.166804160E09 +++$+++ I wonder if it might be useful to incorporate a sort of \"who's who\" list of important and\/or useful media scholars (Herman, McChesney, Denis McQuail and so on). How would you like to see such a thing done?  +++$+++ ::: I wonder if it might be useful to incorporate a sort of "who's who" list of important and/or useful media scholars (Herman, McChesney, Denis McQuail and so on). How would you like to see such a thing done? [[User:Jstalker|Jstalker]] 08:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

568270 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-11 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.144794960E09 +++$+++ You shouldn't really post attacks in the deletion reason. Good work, though! ''' +++$+++ You shouldn't really post attacks in the deletion reason. Good work, though! '''[[User:Sceptre|<span style="color: #09F">Sceptr</span>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color: green">e</span>]]''' <sup>(<em>[[User_talk:Sceptre|<span style="color: #606">Talk</span>]]</em>)</sup> 15:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
568271 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568270 +++$+++ 568270 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.144795140E09 +++$+++ I didn't post it deliberately, the field was automatically filled as the deletion page came up. Regards, <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :I didn't post it deliberately, the field was automatically filled as the deletion page came up. Regards, <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 15:39, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
568272 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568270 +++$+++ 568270 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.144795620E09 +++$+++ If you believe this to be something more than [[WP:NFT|something made up in school one day]], then please chase down the origin of the quote, providing a citation and reference for same, and place it in Wikiquote, where it would belong.  The phrase and the article are unencyclop\xe6dic. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :If you believe this to be something more than [[WP:NFT|something made up in school one day]], then please chase down the origin of the quote, providing a citation and reference for same, and place it in Wikiquote, where it would belong.  The phrase and the article are unencyclopædic. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 15:47, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
568273 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568270 +++$+++ 568270 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.144893720E09 +++$+++ ''\"...a couple of hundred people... celebrating it.\"'' Please read [[WP:NFT|Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day]]. An unofficial student amusement at Cornell falls below the criteria for notability for public holiday articles on Wikipedia. Regards, <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :''"...a couple of hundred people... celebrating it."'' Please read [[WP:NFT|Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day]]. An unofficial student amusement at Cornell falls below the criteria for notability for public holiday articles on Wikipedia. Regards, <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 19:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
568274 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568270 +++$+++ 568270 +++$+++ 2006-04-13 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.144932120E09 +++$+++ In addition to [[WP:NFT]], please read [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]].  Reliable sources should be cited and referenced in as many as possible, if not all, encyclop\xe6dic articles.  Up to two hundred people at Cornell one year, ''\"depending on how many shirts those people have sold\"'', is not notable.  Reading the [[Steak and Blowjob Day]] article, I see that it has spread beyond its initial chauvanistic, sarcastic response to Valentine's Day to become an Internet meme.  It is the meme that is the notable point of the article and its origin is recorded but not the subject of said article. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :In addition to [[WP:NFT]], please read [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]].  Reliable sources should be cited and referenced in as many as possible, if not all, encyclopædic articles.  Up to two hundred people at Cornell one year, ''"depending on how many shirts those people have sold"'', is not notable.  Reading the [[Steak and Blowjob Day]] article, I see that it has spread beyond its initial chauvanistic, sarcastic response to Valentine's Day to become an Internet meme.  It is the meme that is the notable point of the article and its origin is recorded but not the subject of said article. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 05:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

526038 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-09 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.152433080E09 +++$+++ It's always good to hear from you.   I read the articles about the [[Battle of Hakodate]] and [[William T. Perkins, Jr.]] and found them great.  I've been working on the [[2nd Battalion, 9th Marines]], an article created by Looper, little by little.  How do you like it so far?  Man, this week was a little rough.  Wife still sick, mother-in-law was in intensive (better now) (I'm the family commanding officer) but, on the lighter side I was invited to a boxing event by boxing promotor [[Roberto Duran]] and we hang out together.  Semper Fi  +++$+++ It's always good to hear from you.   I read the articles about the [[Battle of Hakodate]] and [[William T. Perkins, Jr.]] and found them great.  I've been working on the [[2nd Battalion, 9th Marines]], an article created by Looper, little by little.  How do you like it so far?  Man, this week was a little rough.  Wife still sick, mother-in-law was in intensive (better now) (I'm the family commanding officer) but, on the lighter side I was invited to a boxing event by boxing promotor [[Roberto Duran]] and we hang out together.  Semper Fi [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:18, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
526039 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526038 +++$+++ 526038 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.152435420E09 +++$+++ Yep, I did like what you did to the MOH in the article.  That's exactly why I did the same to the others.  I think you, Looper and I make a great team article and friendship wise.  Semper Fi.   +++$+++ *Yep, I did like what you did to the MOH in the article.  That's exactly why I did the same to the others.  I think you, Looper and I make a great team article and friendship wise.  Semper Fi.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

263896 +++$+++ Capitalistroadster +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263896 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-08 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.165598340E09 +++$+++ I have rewritten the article so as to hopefully establish notability. I would be grateful if you could take a look.  +++$+++ I have rewritten the article so as to hopefully establish notability. I would be grateful if you could take a look. [[User:Capitalistroadster|Capitalistroadster]] 09:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
263897 +++$+++ Ad hominem2 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263896 +++$+++ 263896 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.165649100E09 +++$+++ {{vandal|Netscott}} repeatedly reverted good faith edits, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Somebody_Up_There_Likes_Me_%28film%29&diff=93031006&oldid=93030809 here] Do something about it or this message will not go away. +++$+++ * {{vandal|Netscott}} repeatedly reverted good faith edits, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Somebody_Up_There_Likes_Me_%28film%29&diff=93031006&oldid=93030809 here] Do something about it or this message will not go away.[[User:Ad hominem2|Ad hominem2]] 23:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
263898 +++$+++ Netscott +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263896 +++$+++ 263896 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.165649400E09 +++$+++ Greetings The JPS, ordinarily I wouldn't be reverting the [[User:Air of reality]] and [[User:Ad hominem2]]'s edits but this user has been defiantly editing despite having been permanently blocked (independently mind you) on a number of accounts. I've decided to become a bit more proactive to discourage this user's involvement. ''([[User talk:Netscott|\u2192]] +++$+++ :Greetings The JPS, ordinarily I wouldn't be reverting the [[User:Air of reality]] and [[User:Ad hominem2]]'s edits but this user has been defiantly editing despite having been permanently blocked (independently mind you) on a number of accounts. I've decided to become a bit more proactive to discourage this user's involvement. ''([[User talk:Netscott|→]][[User:Netscott|<span style='background: white; color: grey'>Netscott</span>]])'' 23:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

526043 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-12 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.152773760E09 +++$+++ Hi buddy, thanks for asking, under the circumstances the family is doing much better, thank you.  As you know I finished the 2\/9 article with a passion.  Somebody asked me to do something in regard to the Hispanics awarded the MOH and I did that yesterday, take a look at [[Hispanics awarded the Medal of Honor]] (Some links lead to articles written by you).  I noticed that there was a Hispanic Marine in the Boxer Rebellion called France Silva who was awarded the medal and that there isn't an article on him. Interested?  Let me know. Semper Fi  +++$+++ Hi buddy, thanks for asking, under the circumstances the family is doing much better, thank you.  As you know I finished the 2/9 article with a passion.  Somebody asked me to do something in regard to the Hispanics awarded the MOH and I did that yesterday, take a look at [[Hispanics awarded the Medal of Honor]] (Some links lead to articles written by you).  I noticed that there was a Hispanic Marine in the Boxer Rebellion called France Silva who was awarded the medal and that there isn't an article on him. Interested?  Let me know. Semper Fi [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
526044 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526043 +++$+++ 526043 +++$+++ 2006-07-13 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.152780900E09 +++$+++ Great job! and nice images too!  Check this out, it seems like an old newspaper drawing of what I assume is France Silva [[http:\/\/www.neta.com\/~1stbooks\/m-ze.htm]].   +++$+++ *Great job! and nice images too!  Check this out, it seems like an old newspaper drawing of what I assume is France Silva [[http://www.neta.com/~1stbooks/m-ze.htm]].  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

263901 +++$+++ Cbrown1023 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263901 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-22 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.166777820E09 +++$+++ The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films\/Outreach\/December 2006 Newsletter|December 2006 issue]]''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published.  You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link.  Thank you.  Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films\/Participants\/Member List|Member List]].  +++$+++ The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Outreach/December 2006 Newsletter|December 2006 issue]]''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published.  You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link.  Thank you.  Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Participants/Member List|Member List]]. [[User:Cbrown1023|Cbrown1023]] 00:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
263902 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263901 +++$+++ 263901 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.166900160E09 +++$+++ Mmmm, ok.  +++$+++ :Mmmm, ok. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

567446 +++$+++ 88888 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-31 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.175409900E09 +++$+++ 4. Goodnight - perhaps it is better here!  +++$+++ 4. Goodnight - perhaps it is better here! [[User:88888|88888]] 23:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
567447 +++$+++ 24.136.230.38 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567446 +++$+++ 567446 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.177747980E09 +++$+++ Well, if you didn't do the vandalism (the IP is shared), then you should '''Log In''' to avoid further irrelevant warnings, or you can just ignore the ones given to you. -- +++$+++ :Well, if you didn't do the vandalism (the IP is shared), then you should '''Log In''' to avoid further irrelevant warnings, or you can just ignore the ones given to you. --[[User:24.136.230.38|24.136.230.38]] 01:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

1759 +++$+++ Bobthefish2 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1759 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-20 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.292861040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Bobthefish2|Bobthefish2]] ([[User talk:Bobthefish2|talk]]) 08:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
1760 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1759 +++$+++ 1759 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 10:03:00 +++$+++ 1.292954580E09 +++$+++ There may be some confusion here. The prime source I have uses \"Poisson Binomial Distribution\" for a different distribution than that set out in [[Poisson binomial distribution]]. However, it does have that distribution under the name \"Poissonian binomial sampling\", but does say that has been known also under that \"Poisson Binomial Distribution\" and as the \"binomial distribution of Poisson\". References go back to Poisson in 1837. My source is: Johnson NL; Kotz, S.; Kemp, A.W.(1993) ''Univariate Discrete Distributions'', 2nd edition. Wiley ISBN 0-471-54897-9 (page138 for \"Poissonian binomial sampling\"). I think that perhaps this hasn't been generally counted as a \"distribution\" because it has so many parameters, but it has certainly been studied. [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe|talk]]) 10:00, 21 December 2010 (UTC) (Placed on user's talk page also)  +++$+++ :There may be some confusion here. The prime source I have uses "Poisson Binomial Distribution" for a different distribution than that set out in [[Poisson binomial distribution]]. However, it does have that distribution under the name "Poissonian binomial sampling", but does say that has been known also under that "Poisson Binomial Distribution" and as the "binomial distribution of Poisson". References go back to Poisson in 1837. My source is: Johnson NL; Kotz, S.; Kemp, A.W.(1993) ''Univariate Discrete Distributions'', 2nd edition. Wiley ISBN 0-471-54897-9 (page138 for "Poissonian binomial sampling"). I think that perhaps this hasn't been generally counted as a "distribution" because it has so many parameters, but it has certainly been studied. [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe|talk]]) 10:00, 21 December 2010 (UTC) (Placed on user's talk page also) [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe#top|talk]]) 10:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

263904 +++$+++ Benc533 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-23 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.166940600E09 +++$+++ I did do that originally, however some of the sources are by the same author and simply referencing <nowiki><ref>Little, Daran. p24.<\/ref><\/nowiki> for example left the location of the reference unclear. What do I do to refer to multiple books by the same author?  +++$+++ I did do that originally, however some of the sources are by the same author and simply referencing <nowiki><ref>Little, Daran. p24.</ref></nowiki> for example left the location of the reference unclear. What do I do to refer to multiple books by the same author? [[User:Benc533|Ben]] 22:10, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
263905 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263904 +++$+++ 263904 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.166942460E09 +++$+++ You could use the year in which they were published: Little (1990) p. 34. That's practically the Harvard System anyway.  +++$+++ :You could use the year in which they were published: Little (1990) p. 34. That's practically the Harvard System anyway. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

263906 +++$+++ Dposse +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-30 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.167530160E09 +++$+++ I need some help. I'm trying to do a AFD of [[Retro metal]] for going against [[WP:NEO]]. As you can see from the history of the AFD, i tried and failed. I dunno how you guys do it, but i could really use some help. Thanks.  +++$+++ I need some help. I'm trying to do a AFD of [[Retro metal]] for going against [[WP:NEO]]. As you can see from the history of the AFD, i tried and failed. I dunno how you guys do it, but i could really use some help. Thanks. [[User:Dposse|dposse]] 17:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
263907 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263906 +++$+++ 263906 +++$+++ 2006-12-31 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.167599580E09 +++$+++ The fact that you are using the words \"suffered enough\" suggests to me that you have a POV, and a desire to create suffering. Wikipedia is not ''The Sun'' or the ''News of the World''. We don't have a fetish about pedophilia, or an obsession about writing about them. You already have a majority view, and the reasons have been clearly stated. Please do not add those words.  +++$+++ :The fact that you are using the words "suffered enough" suggests to me that you have a POV, and a desire to create suffering. Wikipedia is not ''The Sun'' or the ''News of the World''. We don't have a fetish about pedophilia, or an obsession about writing about them. You already have a majority view, and the reasons have been clearly stated. Please do not add those words. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
263908 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263906 +++$+++ 263906 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.167791460E09 +++$+++ Policy, I'm afraid, Dave. Specifically [[WP:BIO]].  +++$+++ :Policy, I'm afraid, Dave. Specifically [[WP:BIO]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
263909 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263906 +++$+++ 263906 +++$+++ 2006-12-31 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.167613020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your article. However, Aardvark Records does not seem to be notable and was thus deleted in accordance with our policy.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your article. However, Aardvark Records does not seem to be notable and was thus deleted in accordance with our policy. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
263910 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263906 +++$+++ 263906 +++$+++ 2007-01-01 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.167678600E09 +++$+++ Bye, then.  +++$+++ :Bye, then. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
263911 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263906 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.167791460E09 +++$+++ Oh, as for democracy... another editor tagged it as not notable. I agreed. 2vs1 = democracy rules.  +++$+++ :::Oh, as for democracy... another editor tagged it as not notable. I agreed. 2vs1 = democracy rules. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

1764 +++$+++ Mathstat +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-22 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.298434800E09 +++$+++ I don't think that ''Estimation theory'' adequately covers the scope of V-statistis as they are not used just for estimation. In fact, in the many examples involving degenerate kernels typically the statistic is used for hypothesis testing and does not have a good application for estimation (e.g. Cramer-von Mises type statistics, and others). I could give more examples. Also I don't understand why general categories such as Statistics or Probability should be deleted. V-statistics encompass a wide class of statistics, so I thought category Statistics is applicable. But then I noticed that you called it a \"silly\" category for U-statistics. Perhaps I do not understand the rationale of a category. In biographies all categories that apply are used, even if one or more is a superset of the other. Why is it different here? When I pull up a page of categories on say Theory of probability distributions, I would hope that I can find most relevant articles and not just the ones that failed to fall into a more specific category. Have I missed the point? A good explanation would help me.  +++$+++ I don't think that ''Estimation theory'' adequately covers the scope of V-statistis as they are not used just for estimation. In fact, in the many examples involving degenerate kernels typically the statistic is used for hypothesis testing and does not have a good application for estimation (e.g. Cramer-von Mises type statistics, and others). I could give more examples. Also I don't understand why general categories such as Statistics or Probability should be deleted. V-statistics encompass a wide class of statistics, so I thought category Statistics is applicable. But then I noticed that you called it a "silly" category for U-statistics. Perhaps I do not understand the rationale of a category. In biographies all categories that apply are used, even if one or more is a superset of the other. Why is it different here? When I pull up a page of categories on say Theory of probability distributions, I would hope that I can find most relevant articles and not just the ones that failed to fall into a more specific category. Have I missed the point? A good explanation would help me. [[User:Mathstat|Mathstat]] ([[User talk:Mathstat|talk]]) 20:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
1765 +++$+++ Mathstat +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1764 +++$+++ 1764 +++$+++ 2011-02-25 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.298684880E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for your reply. Maybe the real problem is that there is not a broad enough yet narrow enough category for some articles. I replied more on my talk page below your explanation.  +++$+++ :Hi, thanks for your reply. Maybe the real problem is that there is not a broad enough yet narrow enough category for some articles. I replied more on my talk page below your explanation. [[User:Mathstat|Mathstat]] ([[User talk:Mathstat|talk]]) 17:48, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

1766 +++$+++ Gill110951 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-03 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.299214860E09 +++$+++ Probabilities which are one another's reverse is meaningless, I think. Bayes theorem is about updating of beliefs given new evidence. Please explain what you think was wrong in my edit.  +++$+++ Probabilities which are one another's reverse is meaningless, I think. Bayes theorem is about updating of beliefs given new evidence. Please explain what you think was wrong in my edit. [[User:Gill110951|Richard Gill]] ([[User talk:Gill110951|talk]]) 21:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
1767 +++$+++ Gill110951 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1766 +++$+++ 1766 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.299259980E09 +++$+++ I have made another attempt at improvement.  +++$+++ : I have made another attempt at improvement. [[User:Gill110951|Richard Gill]] ([[User talk:Gill110951|talk]]) 09:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

1771 +++$+++ Philtime +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1771 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-17 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.305684300E09 +++$+++ Hi Melcombe. As you are one of the most active wiki-mathematicians and you once made some edits to the article [[Copula (statistics)]], I would like to ask you about something. I would like to develop and improve the latter article. Started with that on sunday, but got completely reverted by some guy who calls probability theory a small subset of statistics... I dont want to start an edit war. could you have a look at my edits and comment? or even better, if you have some time free, help editing? that would be great! I dont insist on the renaming, but the content revertions i do not understand. regards,  +++$+++ Hi Melcombe. As you are one of the most active wiki-mathematicians and you once made some edits to the article [[Copula (statistics)]], I would like to ask you about something. I would like to develop and improve the latter article. Started with that on sunday, but got completely reverted by some guy who calls probability theory a small subset of statistics... I dont want to start an edit war. could you have a look at my edits and comment? or even better, if you have some time free, help editing? that would be great! I dont insist on the renaming, but the content revertions i do not understand. regards, [[User:Philtime|Philtime]] ([[User talk:Philtime|talk]]) 19:05, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
1772 +++$+++ Philtime +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1771 +++$+++ 1771 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.306021260E09 +++$+++ Hi melcombe, thank you very much for your constructive comments. I'll work over my edits in the near future according to the stated manual.  +++$+++ : Hi melcombe, thank you very much for your constructive comments. I'll work over my edits in the near future according to the stated manual. [[User:Philtime|Philtime]] ([[User talk:Philtime|talk]]) 16:41, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

1773 +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-18 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.305759780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe|talk]]) 16:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
1774 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ Melcombe +++$+++ 1773 +++$+++ 1773 +++$+++ 2011-05-19 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.305821580E09 +++$+++ Done, although in future you will find you will get requests like this completed more quickly at [[WP:REFUND]].  +++$+++ :Done, although in future you will find you will get requests like this completed more quickly at [[WP:REFUND]]. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 09:13, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

263920 +++$+++ Benc533 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.168071660E09 +++$+++ Hello The JPS, I'm just asking if you have any feedback on the article ''[[Coronation Street]]''?  +++$+++ Hello The JPS, I'm just asking if you have any feedback on the article ''[[Coronation Street]]''? [[User:Benc533|Ben]] 00:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
263921 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263920 +++$+++ 263920 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.168161660E09 +++$+++ I think that's it. It may have been a little premature nominating it for GA status -- I'd have gone to [[Wikipedia:Peer review]] first for such a complicated article.  +++$+++ :I think that's it. It may have been a little premature nominating it for GA status -- I'd have gone to [[Wikipedia:Peer review]] first for such a complicated article. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 01:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
263922 +++$+++ Benc533 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263920 +++$+++ 263921 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.168168260E09 +++$+++ Thankyou so much for you comments and general tidying. I considered a peer review but I wasn't really all that sure...I'm still quite new here. I will address the images and their fair use rationales  +++$+++ ::Thankyou so much for you comments and general tidying. I considered a peer review but I wasn't really all that sure...I'm still quite new here. I will address the images and their fair use rationales [[User:Benc533|Ben]] 03:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

526067 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.153307640E09 +++$+++ You know, I missed that little detail and I'm not sure if the Army had ever awarded a POW the MOH in prior wars.  So, to make the situation a politically correct one, I added the fact that it was for his actions in southeast asia.  Thanks for bringing that up.  Semper Fi  +++$+++ You know, I missed that little detail and I'm not sure if the Army had ever awarded a POW the MOH in prior wars.  So, to make the situation a politically correct one, I added the fact that it was for his actions in southeast asia.  Thanks for bringing that up.  Semper Fi [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
526068 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526067 +++$+++ 526067 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.153308060E09 +++$+++ Thank you for editing both articles.  Great job!   +++$+++ * Thank you for editing both articles.  Great job!  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

526069 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.153308840E09 +++$+++ That's true there was a POW after him (I believe that Senator John McCain was one also) and according to what I understand in other wars the Navy and Marines have awarded the medal to some POW's.  The thing is that Versace was the first Army POW to earn the medal in Nam.  What I don't know is if the Army  had ever awarded the medal to any other prisoner of war for their actions while in captivity.  What do you think?   +++$+++ That's true there was a POW after him (I believe that Senator John McCain was one also) and according to what I understand in other wars the Navy and Marines have awarded the medal to some POW's.  The thing is that Versace was the first Army POW to earn the medal in Nam.  What I don't know is if the Army  had ever awarded the medal to any other prisoner of war for their actions while in captivity.  What do you think?  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:34, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
526070 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526069 +++$+++ 526069 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.153310100E09 +++$+++ Man, it really is great to gain more and more knowledge isn't it? It's like a history lesson.  One thing that I did learn for sure and that is that Versace definitly was not the first Army POW MOH but, only the first Army POW to earn the MOH in Nam.  Semper Fi   +++$+++ *Man, it really is great to gain more and more knowledge isn't it? It's like a history lesson.  One thing that I did learn for sure and that is that Versace definitly was not the first Army POW MOH but, only the first Army POW to earn the MOH in Nam.  Semper Fi  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

263926 +++$+++ Rasillon +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-13 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.168742220E09 +++$+++ Oh and the Roy Keane one did too.  +++$+++ Oh and the Roy Keane one did too. [[User:Rasillon|Rasillon]] 18:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263927 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.168742400E09 +++$+++ Coule you please tell me which ones you took from elsewhere?  +++$+++ :Coule you please tell me which ones you took from elsewhere? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263928 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ 263927 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.168742880E09 +++$+++ Unjust block, JPS? The user made honest mistakes with the images. The best thing would have been to discuss before blocking. By the way, I have been in correspondence with this user on MSN, and I have been looking at his images and such. ''' +++$+++ ::Unjust block, JPS? The user made honest mistakes with the images. The best thing would have been to discuss before blocking. By the way, I have been in correspondence with this user on MSN, and I have been looking at his images and such. '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 18:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263929 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ 263928 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.168743060E09 +++$+++ I understand your concerns, Nishkid64, but I'm now 100% confident that this is a sockpuppet of [[User:Molag Bal]]. All the patterns are there. If this was a genuine new user, and a genuine error, then the course of action you suggest would be absolutely appropriate.  +++$+++ :::I understand your concerns, Nishkid64, but I'm now 100% confident that this is a sockpuppet of [[User:Molag Bal]]. All the patterns are there. If this was a genuine new user, and a genuine error, then the course of action you suggest would be absolutely appropriate. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:51, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263930 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ 263929 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.168743240E09 +++$+++ We know he's Molag Bal. We gave him another chance, and he has since taken advantage of it and contributed to Wikipedia. We told him if he did anything wrong, we'd block him indefinitely as a sockpuppet. Regardless of this, the block still seems unjust when it's a new user who isn't quite familiar with image tagging. ''' +++$+++ ::::We know he's Molag Bal. We gave him another chance, and he has since taken advantage of it and contributed to Wikipedia. We told him if he did anything wrong, we'd block him indefinitely as a sockpuppet. Regardless of this, the block still seems unjust when it's a new user who isn't quite familiar with image tagging. '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 18:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263931 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ 263930 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.168743360E09 +++$+++ We being Nishkid64 and me (and some others know too).  We've given him (yet) another chance, despite death threats etc in the past. <strong> +++$+++ :::::We being Nishkid64 and me (and some others know too).  We've given him (yet) another chance, despite death threats etc in the past. <strong>[[User:Martinp23|Mart]]<font color="red">[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]</font></strong> 18:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263932 +++$+++ Craigy144 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ 263929 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.168743660E09 +++$+++ How can you call it an 'honest mistake' when he clearly lied about the images when adding the tags? Perhaps a permanent block is too cruel, but he's simply re-offending, if only in a different way.  +++$+++ ::::How can you call it an 'honest mistake' when he clearly lied about the images when adding the tags? Perhaps a permanent block is too cruel, but he's simply re-offending, if only in a different way. [[User:Craigy144|Craigy]] ([[User_talk:Craigy144|talk]]) 19:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263933 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ 263927 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.168743660E09 +++$+++ If community consensus is to give him another chance, then I'll remove the idefinate blcok. He is not a new user, even if it is a new account. He must stop lying about images. \"Unfamilar\" with the tagging process might be an excuse for some errors, but not a staright forward lie. For instance, the Sunderland Empire image is neither taken by himself, or the BBC as he subsequently claimed. I insist on at least a short block so that he learns the importance of image uplaods.  +++$+++ ::If community consensus is to give him another chance, then I'll remove the idefinate blcok. He is not a new user, even if it is a new account. He must stop lying about images. "Unfamilar" with the tagging process might be an excuse for some errors, but not a staright forward lie. For instance, the Sunderland Empire image is neither taken by himself, or the BBC as he subsequently claimed. I insist on at least a short block so that he learns the importance of image uplaods. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263934 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ 263931 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.168743780E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict) Re: the message I just saw on my talk: I'm amazed that you found it out (and can understand that you're probably confused now). The reason that we didn't indef Rasillon on sight was partly due to our kind nature and partly to due to the fact that he seems to fly off the handle whenever blocked, so by giving him another chance, and keeping inclose contact with him, we've been able to make sure he doesn't get out of hand. <strong> +++$+++ ::::::(edit conflict) Re: the message I just saw on my talk: I'm amazed that you found it out (and can understand that you're probably confused now). The reason that we didn't indef Rasillon on sight was partly due to our kind nature and partly to due to the fact that he seems to fly off the handle whenever blocked, so by giving him another chance, and keeping inclose contact with him, we've been able to make sure he doesn't get out of hand. <strong>[[User:Martinp23|Mart]]<font color="red">[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]</font></strong> 19:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263935 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ 263934 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.168743780E09 +++$+++ For \"honest mistake\", I'll clarify that I agree with you that his lying was disruptive, and would probably have blocked similarly (with a slightly longer delay). <strong> +++$+++ :::::::For "honest mistake", I'll clarify that I agree with you that his lying was disruptive, and would probably have blocked similarly (with a slightly longer delay). <strong>[[User:Martinp23|Mart]]<font color="red">[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]</font></strong> 19:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263936 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ 263935 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.168743780E09 +++$+++ (fourth edit conflict) Question - was Molag Bal banned (and where)?  If he was, then I'd have blocked long ago... <strong> +++$+++ ::::::::(fourth edit conflict) Question - was Molag Bal banned (and where)?  If he was, then I'd have blocked long ago... <strong>[[User:Martinp23|Mart]]<font color="red">[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]</font></strong> 19:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263937 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263926 +++$+++ 263936 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.168753500E09 +++$+++ Hmm turns out he was - read the above as \"had I known that...\".  He has since shown himself as a good editor, so I wouldn't be willing to block. <strong> +++$+++ :::::::::Hmm turns out he was - read the above as "had I known that...".  He has since shown himself as a good editor, so I wouldn't be willing to block. <strong>[[User:Martinp23|Mart]]<font color="red">[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]</font></strong> 21:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

526073 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526073 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-20 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.153381620E09 +++$+++ I don't believe it's personal.  Maybe he's a very lonely person who doesn't have anyone else to talk to (smile) and enjoys creating debates.  On the other hand, I really believe that he does not have bad intentions.  The positive thing is that we may finally get the proper name of the award striaght.   +++$+++ I don't believe it's personal.  Maybe he's a very lonely person who doesn't have anyone else to talk to (smile) and enjoys creating debates.  On the other hand, I really believe that he does not have bad intentions.  The positive thing is that we may finally get the proper name of the award striaght.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
526074 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526073 +++$+++ 526073 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.153382400E09 +++$+++ Thanks, you're the man!  Check out my name suggestion on the Herrera talk and ley me know.   +++$+++ *Thanks, you're the man!  Check out my name suggestion on the Herrera talk and ley me know.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

526076 +++$+++ Bolivian Unicyclist +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526076 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-20 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.153429440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the kind message you left on my talk page; I've been enjoying the discussion and investigation it has entailed. The [http:\/\/info4.juridicas.unam.mx\/ijure\/tcfed\/21.htm?s= law] I posted is 2003 legislation, superseding a prev. one from 31 Dec 1955; I don't know why there's a reference to this past June at the top. I've found another (fascinating) piece of Mexican legislation which I'll be posting on the Herrera talk page in a minute; from 2004, illustrations of the medals, classes, etc.  +++$+++ Thanks for the kind message you left on my talk page; I've been enjoying the discussion and investigation it has entailed. The [http://info4.juridicas.unam.mx/ijure/tcfed/21.htm?s= law] I posted is 2003 legislation, superseding a prev. one from 31 Dec 1955; I don't know why there's a reference to this past June at the top. I've found another (fascinating) piece of Mexican legislation which I'll be posting on the Herrera talk page in a minute; from 2004, illustrations of the medals, classes, etc. [[User:Bolivian Unicyclist|Bolivian Unicyclist]] 14:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
526077 +++$+++ Bolivian Unicyclist +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526076 +++$+++ 526076 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.153443480E09 +++$+++ 1955 law: [http:\/\/info4.juridicas.unam.mx\/juslab\/leylab\/22\/ voil\xe0]. Superseding an earlier one of 11 March 1926.  +++$+++ :1955 law: [http://info4.juridicas.unam.mx/juslab/leylab/22/ voilà]. Superseding an earlier one of 11 March 1926. [[User:Bolivian Unicyclist|Bolivian Unicyclist]] 17:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
526078 +++$+++ Bolivian Unicyclist +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526076 +++$+++ 526077 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.153461600E09 +++$+++ No, unfortunately. I've not been able to dig up the '26 law. And that's the one that would have applied to his award (given in '46, per the article's \"one year after\").  +++$+++ ::No, unfortunately. I've not been able to dig up the '26 law. And that's the one that would have applied to his award (given in '46, per the article's "one year after"). [[User:Bolivian Unicyclist|Bolivian Unicyclist]] 23:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

524586 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524586 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-06 08:58:00 +++$+++ 1.194368280E09 +++$+++ PS. I found this watered down version of the Rolling Stone story [http:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/artists\/jerryleelewis\/biography. Here]. I will be able to provide the sourcing if I decide to go ahead with it. :  +++$+++ PS. I found this watered down version of the Rolling Stone story [http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/jerryleelewis/biography. Here]. I will be able to provide the sourcing if I decide to go ahead with it. : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 08:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
524587 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524586 +++$+++ 524586 +++$+++ 2007-11-06 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.194386040E09 +++$+++ Not that I know of. There is [[Talk:Jerry_Lee_Lewis#WIFE_KILLER_.3F.3F|a question about that]] on the article talk page, but it doesn't get any good answer, and there aren't any talk page archives. I gather it just hasn't been written about yet. A [[wikipedia:coatrack|coatrack]] article is usually about people not famous except for one event, that is really writing about the event under the person's name. [[Jerry Lee Lewis]] is famous for quite a number of things, including legendary hit music, and, yes, multiple scandals. As long as we don't skimp on the coverage of the music, which should be substantial, writing about the scandals is also important. [[Rolling Stone]] is about as respected as source as their is in the music world. Make sure everything you write is well sourced, don't read more into the article than it says. I gather you mean \"The Strange and Mysterious Death of Mrs. Jerry Lee Lewis\", Richard Ben Cramer, ''Rolling Stone'', March 1, 1984? I can't find that on line anywhere, but it is mentioned in several places. I imagine you can find it in a library, many are good at collecting ''Rolling Stone''. It would be good to have the actual story you are citing, not just a paraphrase. The Rolling Stone biography will do, but having the full length story is better. Good luck. -- +++$+++ : Not that I know of. There is [[Talk:Jerry_Lee_Lewis#WIFE_KILLER_.3F.3F|a question about that]] on the article talk page, but it doesn't get any good answer, and there aren't any talk page archives. I gather it just hasn't been written about yet. A [[wikipedia:coatrack|coatrack]] article is usually about people not famous except for one event, that is really writing about the event under the person's name. [[Jerry Lee Lewis]] is famous for quite a number of things, including legendary hit music, and, yes, multiple scandals. As long as we don't skimp on the coverage of the music, which should be substantial, writing about the scandals is also important. [[Rolling Stone]] is about as respected as source as their is in the music world. Make sure everything you write is well sourced, don't read more into the article than it says. I gather you mean "The Strange and Mysterious Death of Mrs. Jerry Lee Lewis", Richard Ben Cramer, ''Rolling Stone'', March 1, 1984? I can't find that on line anywhere, but it is mentioned in several places. I imagine you can find it in a library, many are good at collecting ''Rolling Stone''. It would be good to have the actual story you are citing, not just a paraphrase. The Rolling Stone biography will do, but having the full length story is better. Good luck. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
524588 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524586 +++$+++ 524587 +++$+++ 2007-11-06 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.194392160E09 +++$+++ By the way, here, you absolutely would need to use inline references, as I advised with [[#Dan Crary]], above. I noticed you didn't do that there. I advise using better references even on [[Dan Crary]], but here, if you want to write about someone being suspected of murder, you absolutely need to use very good referencing. [[WP:CITE]] is the guideline in question. -- +++$+++ :: By the way, here, you absolutely would need to use inline references, as I advised with [[#Dan Crary]], above. I noticed you didn't do that there. I advise using better references even on [[Dan Crary]], but here, if you want to write about someone being suspected of murder, you absolutely need to use very good referencing. [[WP:CITE]] is the guideline in question. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

526079 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526079 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-20 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.153447800E09 +++$+++ Will you now accept a nomination for adminship?  A person like you who has made so many contributions to Wiki can make good use of the extra perks.   +++$+++ Will you now accept a nomination for adminship?  A person like you who has made so many contributions to Wiki can make good use of the extra perks.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 19:10, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
526080 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526079 +++$+++ 526079 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.153452720E09 +++$+++ O.K., I'm scratching my head again (if I keep this up I'm not going to have any hair left).  I know that I say that I'm going to slow down with the articlesbut but, I'm tempted to write the bio of Civil War MoH Joseph H. De Castro who belonged to Company I, 19th Massachusetts Infantry. Wouldn't he be considered the Army's first Hispanic MoH and not David B. Barkley as it is commonly believed?  I feel that we must be politically correct on this issue, so what do you think?  +++$+++ *O.K., I'm scratching my head again (if I keep this up I'm not going to have any hair left).  I know that I say that I'm going to slow down with the articlesbut but, I'm tempted to write the bio of Civil War MoH Joseph H. De Castro who belonged to Company I, 19th Massachusetts Infantry. Wouldn't he be considered the Army's first Hispanic MoH and not David B. Barkley as it is commonly believed?  I feel that we must be politically correct on this issue, so what do you think? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 20:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

263938 +++$+++ Shreshth91 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-13 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.168744080E09 +++$+++ I don't mean to wheel war here, but I find your block reason of ''\"short block for lying about images\"'' truly absurd, especially after he has apologized. This user has shown interest in constructive editing, therefore, I have unblocked him. I hope you realize that blocks are meant to be preventive not punitive. --<span class=\"user-sig user-Shreshth91\">May the Force be with you!   +++$+++ I don't mean to wheel war here, but I find your block reason of ''"short block for lying about images"'' truly absurd, especially after he has apologized. This user has shown interest in constructive editing, therefore, I have unblocked him. I hope you realize that blocks are meant to be preventive not punitive. --<span class="user-sig user-Shreshth91">May the Force be with you!  [[User:Shreshth91|Shr]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User talk:Shreshth91|shth91]]</span> 19:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263939 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263938 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.168744320E09 +++$+++ Not absurd at all. Copyright is serious, and needs to be emphasised to ''prevent'' further breaches. User knows better. It's been discussed, and it seems that Nishkid64 and I have compromised ona one-hour block.  +++$+++ ::Not absurd at all. Copyright is serious, and needs to be emphasised to ''prevent'' further breaches. User knows better. It's been discussed, and it seems that Nishkid64 and I have compromised ona one-hour block. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263940 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263938 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.168744440E09 +++$+++ Not really, JPS. I only let the 1-hour block go because Rasillon just went offline (on MSN). ''' +++$+++ :::Not really, JPS. I only let the 1-hour block go because Rasillon just went offline (on MSN). '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 19:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263941 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263938 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.168744560E09 +++$+++ II'll keep an eye on his contribs.  +++$+++ :::II'll keep an eye on his contribs. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263942 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263938 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.168745100E09 +++$+++ As will we (Martin and I). ''' +++$+++ ::::As will we (Martin and I). '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 19:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263943 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263938 +++$+++ 263938 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.168745640E09 +++$+++ I'm glad he has a couple of experienced users to coach him properly. I hope you can fully make him understand his errors.  +++$+++ :I'm glad he has a couple of experienced users to coach him properly. I hope you can fully make him understand his errors. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
263944 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263938 +++$+++ 263943 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.168831440E09 +++$+++ Re: images, I've had a quick word with him on MSN just now, and he's said he'll fix it.  I'm just about to restart to install [[Ubuntu (Linux distribution)|Ubuntu]] (because Vista is boring now :D), but once I've done that (or given up on it), I'll take a proper look and advise him suitably.  Thanks - <strong> +++$+++ ::Re: images, I've had a quick word with him on MSN just now, and he's said he'll fix it.  I'm just about to restart to install [[Ubuntu (Linux distribution)|Ubuntu]] (because Vista is boring now :D), but once I've done that (or given up on it), I'll take a proper look and advise him suitably.  Thanks - <strong>[[User:Martinp23|Mart]]<font color="red">[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]</font></strong> 19:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
263945 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263938 +++$+++ 263944 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.168929540E09 +++$+++ Just an update - we've blocked indef on Rasillon for using (some abusive) sockpuppets, probably including Martinp24.  Sorry for the fuss this has caused - unfortunately it means we need to be on high alert for more socks now :( <strong> +++$+++ :::Just an update - we've blocked indef on Rasillon for using (some abusive) sockpuppets, probably including Martinp24.  Sorry for the fuss this has caused - unfortunately it means we need to be on high alert for more socks now :( <strong>[[User:Martinp23|Mart]]<font color="red">[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]</font></strong> 22:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
263946 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263938 +++$+++ 263945 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.168931580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. I'll keep an eye out. Fortunately he's fairly easy to spot... edits to [[Sunderland]] for instance.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for letting me know. I'll keep an eye out. Fortunately he's fairly easy to spot... edits to [[Sunderland]] for instance. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

1795 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-17 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.263798420E09 +++$+++ OK cool. I'm actually not as active as I used to be in films but I did start the [[WP:Actors]] a while back which includes directors, cinematographers, producers etc. [[User:Lugnuts]] is the one to ask about formatting. If you have any general queries about guidelines to style and film project goals try asking somebody like [[User:Erik]] or [[User:Nehrams2020]]. I always fonud it best though to get on with my own tasks. The biggest priority in my book for films at the moment is building up the Italian and French film lists by year and getting the articles started. There are numerous sites dedicated to French cinema and Italian cinema... But if you want to try to provide a fuller coverage of American films first whatever you feel like. But as you can imagine there is already much bias towards US films on here and world cinema is often neglected. You'll find the most missing articles from places like Germany, France, Italy, Poland, Japan, Hong Kong etc +++$+++ OK cool. I'm actually not as active as I used to be in films but I did start the [[WP:Actors]] a while back which includes directors, cinematographers, producers etc. [[User:Lugnuts]] is the one to ask about formatting. If you have any general queries about guidelines to style and film project goals try asking somebody like [[User:Erik]] or [[User:Nehrams2020]]. I always fonud it best though to get on with my own tasks. The biggest priority in my book for films at the moment is building up the Italian and French film lists by year and getting the articles started. There are numerous sites dedicated to French cinema and Italian cinema... But if you want to try to provide a fuller coverage of American films first whatever you feel like. But as you can imagine there is already much bias towards US films on here and world cinema is often neglected. You'll find the most missing articles from places like Germany, France, Italy, Poland, Japan, Hong Kong etc[[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 23:07, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
1796 +++$+++ Lugnuts +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1795 +++$+++ 1795 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 08:40:00 +++$+++ 1.263832800E09 +++$+++ I second what Dr B has said above - always great to see new people helping out in the film department. EVERY edit is a valid contribution. Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask either myself or post on the [[WT:FILM|talk page]] of the film project. ''' +++$+++ :I second what Dr B has said above - always great to see new people helping out in the film department. EVERY edit is a valid contribution. Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask either myself or post on the [[WT:FILM|talk page]] of the film project. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Lugnuts|talk]]) 08:40, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

526084 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-21 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.153470780E09 +++$+++ Did you notice this is up for FA removal? One person said there was \"no progress\". One thing that jumped out at me is that the refs are all out of whack. I'd hate to see this get de-FA'd. I'll try to help on the refs.  +++$+++ Did you notice this is up for FA removal? One person said there was "no progress". One thing that jumped out at me is that the refs are all out of whack. I'd hate to see this get de-FA'd. I'll try to help on the refs. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 01:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
526085 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526084 +++$+++ 526084 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.153472700E09 +++$+++ I just fixed the refs. There may be a few stragglers. +++$+++ *I just fixed the refs. There may be a few stragglers.[[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 02:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

568278 +++$+++ Bastique +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-19 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.145504460E09 +++$+++ Thank you.   +++$+++ Thank you.  [[User:Bastique|<font size="+1" color="#008800">'''<span class="Unicode">&#08492;</span>'''</font>astique]]<font style="color:#FF72E3;"><span class="Unicode">&#09660;</span></font>'''<sup>[[User talk:Bastique|par<span class="Unicode">&#08467;</span>er]]</sup>'''<font color="#FF0000" size="+1"><span class="Unicode">&#09829;</span></font><sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Bastique|voir]]'''</sup><font color="#5500FF" size="+1">'''<span class="Unicode">&#09809;</span>'''</font> 20:41, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
568279 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568278 +++$+++ 568278 +++$+++ 2006-04-19 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.145508060E09 +++$+++ Hello!  I don't quite understand what you mean.  The AfD process has been undertaken and the result was '''keep'''.  This result is logged on the AfD page for future reference.  When I close debates in this manner, I remove the link to the debate from the main article page, with a note in the edit history regarding the successful keep vote.  I then add a link to the debate to the article's Talk page, for reference.  I have done this for you.  Once articles appear on an AfD page the link stays on.  The debates can be closed early if there has been a mistake in the nomination. The closing admin makes a note of this in their stated reasons for closure.  I hope that this has been of some help.  Please let me know if you need further clarification.  Regards, <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :Hello!  I don't quite understand what you mean.  The AfD process has been undertaken and the result was '''keep'''.  This result is logged on the AfD page for future reference.  When I close debates in this manner, I remove the link to the debate from the main article page, with a note in the edit history regarding the successful keep vote.  I then add a link to the debate to the article's Talk page, for reference.  I have done this for you.  Once articles appear on an AfD page the link stays on.  The debates can be closed early if there has been a mistake in the nomination. The closing admin makes a note of this in their stated reasons for closure.  I hope that this has been of some help.  Please let me know if you need further clarification.  Regards, <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 21:41, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
568280 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568278 +++$+++ 568278 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.145575200E09 +++$+++ Firstly, sign your messages with four tildes - ~ -, so that I don't have to hunt around for the poster's identity! Secondly, the content of the article was ''\"Short hand slang for \"Ello ello, a queue I see, I hate to queue before I pee!\"''.  The article title is highly unlikely to be searched on as it isn't an acronym of the phrase in question.  [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang]], so even if this is a notable phrase, it would be better-placed in Wiktionary, with the appropriate references and usage citations as proof. Regards, <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :Firstly, sign your messages with four tildes - ~ -, so that I don't have to hunt around for the poster's identity! Secondly, the content of the article was ''"Short hand slang for "Ello ello, a queue I see, I hate to queue before I pee!"''.  The article title is highly unlikely to be searched on as it isn't an acronym of the phrase in question.  [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang]], so even if this is a notable phrase, it would be better-placed in Wiktionary, with the appropriate references and usage citations as proof. Regards, <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 16:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

526086 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526086 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-21 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.153529700E09 +++$+++ Since we have determined that De Castro was awarded the MoH while his unit was part of the Army, that would make him the first Hispanic Army MoH.  Now, the question is, Did the Army somehow overlook this fact by officially declaring David B. Barkley its first Hispanic MoH.  This there an official verifiable site which which states that David B. Barkley was offically recognized as the first Hispanic Army MoH?  I know that those questions are going to be asked.  In the [[Humbert Roque Versace]] talk page they asked questions and thanks to one of your references, I was able to answer.  Should the statements in David B. Barkley page in reagard to this claim be fixed if unproven?   +++$+++ Since we have determined that De Castro was awarded the MoH while his unit was part of the Army, that would make him the first Hispanic Army MoH.  Now, the question is, Did the Army somehow overlook this fact by officially declaring David B. Barkley its first Hispanic MoH.  This there an official verifiable site which which states that David B. Barkley was offically recognized as the first Hispanic Army MoH?  I know that those questions are going to be asked.  In the [[Humbert Roque Versace]] talk page they asked questions and thanks to one of your references, I was able to answer.  Should the statements in David B. Barkley page in reagard to this claim be fixed if unproven?  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 17:55, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
526087 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526086 +++$+++ 526086 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.153558920E09 +++$+++ I guess the best thing to do for now, is to not do anything and see what happens.  Don't you agree?   +++$+++ *I guess the best thing to do for now, is to not do anything and see what happens.  Don't you agree?  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

526088 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526088 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-22 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.153569480E09 +++$+++ So, what do think of the article?  Does it look O.K?  Check out a comment I left in the talk page of [[Puerto Rican Flag]], right I'm right?  +++$+++ So, what do think of the article?  Does it look O.K?  Check out a comment I left in the talk page of [[Puerto Rican Flag]], right I'm right? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
526089 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526088 +++$+++ 526088 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.153570860E09 +++$+++ Oh, I be here daily.  Aritcle writing takes a lot of my time but, don't be surprised if a subject tempts me.  Hell, I've made some good friends here and I don't have to tell you that you are one of them.  I'm an old Marine so, it won't be that easy to get rid of me, I'll be here everyday checking things. Besides, I still have a little matter of a potential future admin to solve (smile).  +++$+++ *Oh, I be here daily.  Aritcle writing takes a lot of my time but, don't be surprised if a subject tempts me.  Hell, I've made some good friends here and I don't have to tell you that you are one of them.  I'm an old Marine so, it won't be that easy to get rid of me, I'll be here everyday checking things. Besides, I still have a little matter of a potential future admin to solve (smile). [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 05:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
526090 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526088 +++$+++ 526089 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.153574520E09 +++$+++ Thank you buddy, I just came across the following: \"Carmen Contreras-Bozak (from Puerto Rico) became the first Hispanic woman to serve in the Women\u2019s Army Corps as an interpreter and in numerous administrative capacities\".  See what I mean?  Oh well, I guess that'll be my final article.   +++$+++ **Thank you buddy, I just came across the following: "Carmen Contreras-Bozak (from Puerto Rico) became the first Hispanic woman to serve in the Women’s Army Corps as an interpreter and in numerous administrative capacities".  See what I mean?  Oh well, I guess that'll be my final article.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 06:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

263947 +++$+++ Jellonuts +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.168785420E09 +++$+++ Why did you remove the image? You did not even discuss it on the talk page! What does \"rmv unfree IMG mean anyway? The image is free, it is from the author and owner, and even if it were copyrighted there is permission anyway. The source was even cited! Therefore, why did you remove it? PLease don't remove it again without a VALID explanation!  +++$+++ Why did you remove the image? You did not even discuss it on the talk page! What does "rmv unfree IMG mean anyway? The image is free, it is from the author and owner, and even if it were copyrighted there is permission anyway. The source was even cited! Therefore, why did you remove it? PLease don't remove it again without a VALID explanation! [[User:Jellonuts|Jellonuts]] 06:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
263948 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263947 +++$+++ 263947 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.168812360E09 +++$+++ The image was deleted because originally there was no source or license. \"Permission\" has to be expressed via email, and agreeing to licensing conditions. This can be complicated, so I don't expect that you would have known about this. Had the article remained I would have guided you through the process.<br>However, I have deleted the entire article because it is reposted content by an article previously deleted by a consensus gained at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Ill Mitch]]. Please do not repost it,  unless you can provide independent sources of his notability (newspaper articles\/reviews where he is the primary subject). Message boards, YouTube, etc, don't count. They have to be \"proper\" publications.  +++$+++ :The image was deleted because originally there was no source or license. "Permission" has to be expressed via email, and agreeing to licensing conditions. This can be complicated, so I don't expect that you would have known about this. Had the article remained I would have guided you through the process.<br>However, I have deleted the entire article because it is reposted content by an article previously deleted by a consensus gained at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ill Mitch]]. Please do not repost it,  unless you can provide independent sources of his notability (newspaper articles/reviews where he is the primary subject). Message boards, YouTube, etc, don't count. They have to be "proper" publications. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

526092 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-22 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.153624080E09 +++$+++ You messed with my Sandbox.  Hey, you're my pal and I like what you did.   +++$+++ You messed with my Sandbox.  Hey, you're my pal and I like what you did.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 20:08, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
526093 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526092 +++$+++ 526092 +++$+++ 2006-07-23 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.153642980E09 +++$+++ Go (please) to my Sandbox and check out the article.  Fix whatever so, that I can work on my speech.   +++$+++ *Go (please) to my Sandbox and check out the article.  Fix whatever so, that I can work on my speech.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:23, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

263950 +++$+++ Jellonuts +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263950 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.168823160E09 +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Ill Mitch}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Ill Mitch]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.  +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Ill Mitch}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Ill Mitch]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:Jellonuts|Jellonuts]] 17:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
263951 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263950 +++$+++ 263950 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.168830000E09 +++$+++ Great, one tiny mention in some lad's mag... Any more?  +++$+++ :Great, one tiny mention in some lad's mag... Any more? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
263952 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263950 +++$+++ 263950 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.168831020E09 +++$+++ Please understand that this is absolutely nothing personal either against you of that rapper. You are not the first and won't be the last who has had articles deleted.  +++$+++ :Please understand that this is absolutely nothing personal either against you of that rapper. You are not the first and won't be the last who has had articles deleted. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
263953 +++$+++ Jellonuts +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263950 +++$+++ 263950 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.169071560E09 +++$+++ If you will not answer me you should at least participate in the DRV since you are the one that deleted the page and protected it without the benefit of prior discussion.  +++$+++ *If you will not answer me you should at least participate in the DRV since you are the one that deleted the page and protected it without the benefit of prior discussion. [[User:Jellonuts|Jellonuts]] 14:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

526095 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526095 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-23 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.153656840E09 +++$+++ I'm having some minor probs. with the comp.  Please update the numbers in the toolbox in my SB.  Let me know when done.   +++$+++ I'm having some minor probs. with the comp.  Please update the numbers in the toolbox in my SB.  Let me know when done.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 05:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
526096 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526095 +++$+++ 526095 +++$+++ 2006-07-23 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.153709580E09 +++$+++ Small reminder, don't forget to post your nomination (smile).  +++$+++ *Small reminder, don't forget to post your nomination (smile). [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 19:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

526098 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-23 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.153699620E09 +++$+++ More tagging: [[USS Liberty (AGTR-5)]] and [[William McGonagle]], it's captain, the famous Liberty Incident.  +++$+++ More tagging: [[USS Liberty (AGTR-5)]] and [[William McGonagle]], it's captain, the famous Liberty Incident. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 17:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
526099 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526098 +++$+++ 526098 +++$+++ 2006-07-23 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.153699740E09 +++$+++ Will do. &mdash;  +++$+++ * Will do. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 17:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
526100 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526098 +++$+++ 526099 +++$+++ 2006-07-23 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.153707060E09 +++$+++ I tagged [[USS Liberty incident]] for you, using the same info you tagged the ship article with. +++$+++ **I tagged [[USS Liberty incident]] for you, using the same info you tagged the ship article with.[[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 19:11, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

263956 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263956 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.168851120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Max24|Max24]] 00:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
263957 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263956 +++$+++ 263956 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.168849020E09 +++$+++ When I created the page, I had all of the infoboxes in their correct sections (your thinking). An editor, however, noticed that there wasn't enough text to do this on some resolutions. There is enough content for Dion and Meat Loaf now, but not for Pandora's Box. At some resolutions (actually, you can play with the text size in your browser to see what I mean) the infobox eats into the Dion section, and it looks a bit messy. I've kept the PB infobox at the top (which is reasonably close to the relevant text anyway.  +++$+++ :When I created the page, I had all of the infoboxes in their correct sections (your thinking). An editor, however, noticed that there wasn't enough text to do this on some resolutions. There is enough content for Dion and Meat Loaf now, but not for Pandora's Box. At some resolutions (actually, you can play with the text size in your browser to see what I mean) the infobox eats into the Dion section, and it looks a bit messy. I've kept the PB infobox at the top (which is reasonably close to the relevant text anyway. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 00:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

263958 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.168919820E09 +++$+++ You know, there is a reason why it's called a GA '''REVIEW'''. All you did was say it hasn't been improved and fail it without any suggestions whatsoever. Why not give me some suggestions on how to improve the article and I'll do it as opposed to just suggesting I look at an article that is from  a completely different show and is a completely different style. The reason I renominated it is because the last reviewer refused to reiterate their suggestions, so I just remade it a GAC in hopes of getting better comments, and I didn't get any better comments. Next time, at least leave suggestions, or don't bother at all. --  +++$+++ You know, there is a reason why it's called a GA '''REVIEW'''. All you did was say it hasn't been improved and fail it without any suggestions whatsoever. Why not give me some suggestions on how to improve the article and I'll do it as opposed to just suggesting I look at an article that is from  a completely different show and is a completely different style. The reason I renominated it is because the last reviewer refused to reiterate their suggestions, so I just remade it a GAC in hopes of getting better comments, and I didn't get any better comments. Next time, at least leave suggestions, or don't bother at all. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]] 19:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
263959 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263958 +++$+++ 263958 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.168926060E09 +++$+++ The place for requesting comments is [[Wikipedia:Peer review]]. The place for nominating articles is [[WP:GAC]]. The previous reviewer gave you an idea of what to do, and there was little attempt to do them.  +++$+++ :The place for requesting comments is [[Wikipedia:Peer review]]. The place for nominating articles is [[WP:GAC]]. The previous reviewer gave you an idea of what to do, and there was little attempt to do them. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
263960 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263958 +++$+++ 263959 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.168929180E09 +++$+++ Actually, I asked him several times on his talk page to retierate some things, which he did not. As the reviewer of the episode, you could at least provide some constructive comments and give specifics as to why you failed it, otherwise one may suspect that you didn't even bother to thouroughly read the article. As for the peer review, It doesn't work because I've put several articles up for one, none of which have gotten results. --  +++$+++ ::Actually, I asked him several times on his talk page to retierate some things, which he did not. As the reviewer of the episode, you could at least provide some constructive comments and give specifics as to why you failed it, otherwise one may suspect that you didn't even bother to thouroughly read the article. As for the peer review, It doesn't work because I've put several articles up for one, none of which have gotten results. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]] 22:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
263961 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263958 +++$+++ 263960 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.169068920E09 +++$+++ Very well, since you won't comment, I'll renominate the article and hope the next reviewer will leave some comments. --  +++$+++ :::Very well, since you won't comment, I'll renominate the article and hope the next reviewer will leave some comments. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]] 13:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

526103 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526103 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-24 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.153740240E09 +++$+++ Looks good, I'll see what else I can find.  Check this out: \"Marine PFC Guy Gabald\xf3n, from East Los Angeles, single-handedly captured over 1,000 enemy soldiers in the summer of 1944\u2014more than anyone in the history of military conflicts.\"  I found that here: [http:\/\/www.hispaniconline.com\/hh02\/history_did_you_know_sidebar.html].  What do you think?  +++$+++ Looks good, I'll see what else I can find.  Check this out: "Marine PFC Guy Gabaldón, from East Los Angeles, single-handedly captured over 1,000 enemy soldiers in the summer of 1944—more than anyone in the history of military conflicts."  I found that here: [http://www.hispaniconline.com/hh02/history_did_you_know_sidebar.html].  What do you think? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
526104 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526103 +++$+++ 526103 +++$+++ 2006-07-24 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.153741080E09 +++$+++ Check out the \"new\" Miss Universe [[Zuleyka Rivera]] (smile).   +++$+++ *Check out the "new" Miss Universe [[Zuleyka Rivera]] (smile).  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

1820 +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1820 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-04 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.265351460E09 +++$+++ Look at how many posts I had on my talk page today, I didnt even see your post.-- +++$+++ Look at how many posts I had on my talk page today, I didnt even see your post.--[[User:TheMovieBuff|TheMovieBuff]] ([[User talk:TheMovieBuff#top|talk]]) 22:31, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
1821 +++$+++ SarekOfVulcan +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1820 +++$+++ 1820 +++$+++ 2010-02-04 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.265351640E09 +++$+++ You know, that would be a more convincing argument if you hadn't come over to my talkpage to {{diff|User talk:SarekOfVulcan|341977142|341707162|respond to it}}. :-) -- +++$+++ :You know, that would be a more convincing argument if you hadn't come over to my talkpage to {{diff|User talk:SarekOfVulcan|341977142|341707162|respond to it}}. :-) --[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] ([[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|talk]]) 22:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

526109 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526109 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-26 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.153940580E09 +++$+++ [[Naval Station Norfolk]] needs tagged--someone missed the largest navy base in the world? Ugh! I'm retired Navy.  +++$+++ [[Naval Station Norfolk]] needs tagged--someone missed the largest navy base in the world? Ugh! I'm retired Navy. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 12:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
526110 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526109 +++$+++ 526109 +++$+++ 2006-07-26 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.153941840E09 +++$+++ Done, done and done.-- +++$+++ * Done, done and done.--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 12:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
526111 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526109 +++$+++ 526109 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.153985160E09 +++$+++ Might I be so forward as to suggest that you run for the position? :-)  +++$+++ :Might I be so forward as to suggest that you run for the position? :-) [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 00:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
526112 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526109 +++$+++ 526111 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.153993380E09 +++$+++ Well, we have seven positions open, so we definitely need all the good candidates we can get.  Think it over; I hope you'll decide to run :-)  +++$+++ ::Well, we have seven positions open, so we definitely need all the good candidates we can get.  Think it over; I hope you'll decide to run :-) [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 02:43, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
526113 +++$+++ Hossen27 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526109 +++$+++ 526112 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 08:44:00 +++$+++ 1.154015040E09 +++$+++ I also suggest you run for a position in the project, you were a driving force in getting the Australian taskforce up and running  and your no even an Aussie. Your also a dedicated contributor with a very solid knowledge base. My 2 cents  +++$+++ :::I also suggest you run for a position in the project, you were a driving force in getting the Australian taskforce up and running  and your no even an Aussie. Your also a dedicated contributor with a very solid knowledge base. My 2 cents [[User:Hossen27|Hossens27]] 08:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

1822 +++$+++ Beyond My Ken +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-04 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.265352660E09 +++$+++ ...to help avoid having your film articles PRODed and AfDed is to spend a bit more time on each one and flesh them out.  You can, for instance, check out their entries on TCM.COM and ALLMOVIE.COM, where there is usually some useful information which can be used.  I find the \"Notes\" section of TCM particularly valuable for information about a film's production and pre-production periods, and ALLMOVIE often has awards and nominations that aren't listed on IMDB or TCM.<p>Of course, there's no guarantee that having a more complete article will stop it from being deleted, but it will certainly help in arguing for the film's notability, and it will also be less likely to attract the attention of those who object to the creation of film stubs.  +++$+++ ...to help avoid having your film articles PRODed and AfDed is to spend a bit more time on each one and flesh them out.  You can, for instance, check out their entries on TCM.COM and ALLMOVIE.COM, where there is usually some useful information which can be used.  I find the "Notes" section of TCM particularly valuable for information about a film's production and pre-production periods, and ALLMOVIE often has awards and nominations that aren't listed on IMDB or TCM.<p>Of course, there's no guarantee that having a more complete article will stop it from being deleted, but it will certainly help in arguing for the film's notability, and it will also be less likely to attract the attention of those who object to the creation of film stubs. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 22:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
1823 +++$+++ Himalayan Explorer +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1822 +++$+++ 1822 +++$+++ 2010-02-05 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.265360040E09 +++$+++ Try to add a cast column and a reliable source e.g NY Times. TCM etc, that helps. But I think all of these nominations were in bad faith and didn't even give you a chance to improve them. As far as I can see they are actually mainstream films, some of them pretty bad movies, but wikipedia is not here to judge what is good or bad. Sorry you encountered this but hang in there, by the looks of it most in the community agree with me and think they should be kept and worked on in a spirit of collaboration many unfortunately are lacking in on here..  +++$+++ :Try to add a cast column and a reliable source e.g NY Times. TCM etc, that helps. But I think all of these nominations were in bad faith and didn't even give you a chance to improve them. As far as I can see they are actually mainstream films, some of them pretty bad movies, but wikipedia is not here to judge what is good or bad. Sorry you encountered this but hang in there, by the looks of it most in the community agree with me and think they should be kept and worked on in a spirit of collaboration many unfortunately are lacking in on here.. [[User:Himalayan Explorer| <span style="border:2px solid #C5B358 ;padding:0px;"><font size="2"> <font style="color:white;background:#B00760;">'''''‡ Himalayan ‡'''''</font>]]</span><sup>[[User talk:Himalayan Explorer| <font size="-4"><font color="#C5B358">Ψ''Monastery''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 00:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
1824 +++$+++ Ser Amantio di Nicolao +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1822 +++$+++ 1823 +++$+++ 2010-02-05 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.265361900E09 +++$+++ Even if you simply add a couple of lines about plot, with a couple of external links, that could help.  Other than that, I can't give you any constructive suggestions - [[The Eternal Waltz|this]] is the extent of my film-article-writing, and it's only because I watched the damn thing at some point.  Don't get discouraged, though - it's always good to see good, gung-ho new editors. --<font face=\"Old English Text MT\"> +++$+++ ::Even if you simply add a couple of lines about plot, with a couple of external links, that could help.  Other than that, I can't give you any constructive suggestions - [[The Eternal Waltz|this]] is the extent of my film-article-writing, and it's only because I watched the damn thing at some point.  Don't get discouraged, though - it's always good to see good, gung-ho new editors. --<font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|Ser Amantio di Nicolao]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|''Che dicono a Signa?'']]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ser Amantio di Nicolao|'''Lo dicono a Signa.''']]</sub> 01:25, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
1825 +++$+++ Himalayan Explorer +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1822 +++$+++ 1824 +++$+++ 2010-02-05 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.265363400E09 +++$+++ If you could start them like [[The Fourth Wish]] or [[Love Is Better Than Ever]] are now with cast and a reliable source for a reference this should be OK. ALso be careful on nationality of films. You claimed a lot of them were American but were solidly European co productions or even Australian!! Please don't be discouraged by this, and tlet the inevitable outcome of the being kept as testament to their notabilty and acceptance of your will to expand. We do have certain standards as you can clearly see, if you can try to follow our advice I doubt you'd encounter any trouble. Regards.  +++$+++ :::If you could start them like [[The Fourth Wish]] or [[Love Is Better Than Ever]] are now with cast and a reliable source for a reference this should be OK. ALso be careful on nationality of films. You claimed a lot of them were American but were solidly European co productions or even Australian!! Please don't be discouraged by this, and tlet the inevitable outcome of the being kept as testament to their notabilty and acceptance of your will to expand. We do have certain standards as you can clearly see, if you can try to follow our advice I doubt you'd encounter any trouble. Regards. [[User:Himalayan Explorer| <span style="border:2px solid #C5B358 ;padding:0px;"><font size="2"> <font style="color:white;background:#B00760;">'''''‡ Himalayan ‡'''''</font>]]</span><sup>[[User talk:Himalayan Explorer| <font size="-4"><font color="#C5B358">Ψ''Monastery''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 01:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
1826 +++$+++ Beyond My Ken +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1822 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-05 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.265378100E09 +++$+++ Take a look at what's been done to improve [[Starship (film)]] to get an idea of where your articles should be headed towards.  +++$+++ :::::Take a look at what's been done to improve [[Starship (film)]] to get an idea of where your articles should be headed towards. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 05:55, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
1827 +++$+++ Lugnuts +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1822 +++$+++ 1822 +++$+++ 2010-02-05 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.265384520E09 +++$+++ Yes, they are short articles, but all directed by a notable director. I feel PROD overkill here! Thanks to everyone who's helped expand these stubs. ''' +++$+++ :Yes, they are short articles, but all directed by a notable director. I feel PROD overkill here! Thanks to everyone who's helped expand these stubs. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Lugnuts|talk]]) 07:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

263970 +++$+++ Rklawton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-24 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.169691300E09 +++$+++ I removed the uploader's copyright tag from this article because it was incorrect.  The image wasn't an album cover (or anything like it).  I see you tagged it as unlicensed.  The question I have, is this:  did I do the right thing in removing an obviously incorrect copyright tag?  If I did take the correct action, should I also add the unlicensed tag (as you did) next time I find one of these?  Thanks,  +++$+++ I removed the uploader's copyright tag from this article because it was incorrect.  The image wasn't an album cover (or anything like it).  I see you tagged it as unlicensed.  The question I have, is this:  did I do the right thing in removing an obviously incorrect copyright tag?  If I did take the correct action, should I also add the unlicensed tag (as you did) next time I find one of these?  Thanks, [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] 18:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
263971 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263970 +++$+++ 263970 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.169693340E09 +++$+++ Well, since all images should have a license tag, we should flag up those without. So, yes, next time I'd advise you do add the unlicensed tag . Keep it on your watch list because sometimes uploaders will revert you, or add another incorrect one, etc. That image has been deleted before (I tagged it as nld about a year ago). Thanks for identifying it. People often misuse album cover or screenshot tags. If you have any problems, give me a shout.  +++$+++ :Well, since all images should have a license tag, we should flag up those without. So, yes, next time I'd advise you do add the unlicensed tag . Keep it on your watch list because sometimes uploaders will revert you, or add another incorrect one, etc. That image has been deleted before (I tagged it as nld about a year ago). Thanks for identifying it. People often misuse album cover or screenshot tags. If you have any problems, give me a shout. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
263972 +++$+++ Rklawton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263970 +++$+++ 263971 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.169694480E09 +++$+++ Coolio.  Will do, and thanks.  I'm going through album covers 200\/day, so I'll likely catch more.   +++$+++ ::Coolio.  Will do, and thanks.  I'm going through album covers 200/day, so I'll likely catch more.  [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] 19:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

263974 +++$+++ Mavarin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-27 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.169911800E09 +++$+++ Regards....  +++$+++ Regards.... [[User:Mavarin|Karen]] | [[User talk:Mavarin|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Mavarin|contribs]] 07:30, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
263975 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263974 +++$+++ 263974 +++$+++ 2007-01-27 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.169933760E09 +++$+++ Mmm, I reckon it might be better to correct the errors in the current version? There are some careless mistakes (\"The photo is still playing\"), but the IP has got rid of the more superfluous material.  +++$+++ :Mmm, I reckon it might be better to correct the errors in the current version? There are some careless mistakes ("The photo is still playing"), but the IP has got rid of the more superfluous material. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

263976 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-27 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.169943000E09 +++$+++ Hi Ed. You might also want to take a look at [[List of Press Gang episodes]]. I had a polite word with the uploader at [[User_talk:Jay_Firestorm#Images]]. If you want to remove them, you'll have my support.  +++$+++ Hi Ed. You might also want to take a look at [[List of Press Gang episodes]]. I had a polite word with the uploader at [[User_talk:Jay_Firestorm#Images]]. If you want to remove them, you'll have my support. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
263977 +++$+++ ed_g2s +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263976 +++$+++ 263976 +++$+++ 2007-01-27 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.169943300E09 +++$+++ Good spot, it's much less stressful when you find them early. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana;\"> +++$+++ :Good spot, it's much less stressful when you find them early. <span style="font-family: Verdana;">[[User:ed_g2s|ed g2s]] &bull; [[User talk:ed_g2s|talk]]</span> 16:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
263978 +++$+++ ed_g2s +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263976 +++$+++ 263976 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.170261360E09 +++$+++ Unlike [[Talk:List of Heroes episodes#Images]]. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana;\"> +++$+++ :Unlike [[Talk:List of Heroes episodes#Images]]. <span style="font-family: Verdana;">[[User:ed_g2s|ed g2s]] &bull; [[User talk:ed_g2s|talk]]</span> 08:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

568284 +++$+++ Si42 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568284 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-20 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.145590860E09 +++$+++ Hi, sorry about that, I read a procedure page that said it was ok to close the debate if a resolution was apparent, and since I was the only dissenting voice I thought that I would do it, and that I had done it correctly. Once again, sorry. -- +++$+++ Hi, sorry about that, I read a procedure page that said it was ok to close the debate if a resolution was apparent, and since I was the only dissenting voice I thought that I would do it, and that I had done it correctly. Once again, sorry. --[[User:Si42|Si42]] 20:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
568285 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568284 +++$+++ 568284 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.145623020E09 +++$+++ Hello!  Firstly, don't forget to sign your comments with four tildes - ~ -, that way, I don't have to hunt around for your contact details.  Secondly, I'm more than happy to move the page, but I see that page under the new name has already been created.  I will have to delete this in order to move the old page.  There's no need to create a page with the new name for a page move, the request above is sufficient, so bear this in mind for the future.  Regards, <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :Hello!  Firstly, don't forget to sign your comments with four tildes - ~ -, that way, I don't have to hunt around for your contact details.  Secondly, I'm more than happy to move the page, but I see that page under the new name has already been created.  I will have to delete this in order to move the old page.  There's no need to create a page with the new name for a page move, the request above is sufficient, so bear this in mind for the future.  Regards, <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 05:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
568286 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568284 +++$+++ 568284 +++$+++ 2006-04-23 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.145853900E09 +++$+++ Firstly, [[Be_civil|be civil]].  Your comments above are derogatory and don't help you to put a case in any way.  Secondly, sign your comments with four tildes - ~ - in order for the recepient to respond without having to hunt around for your identity.  ''\"The term is currently not used in mainstream colloquial International English, and no regional variants of it exist.  The use is mainly limited to forms of communications over the Internet, mainly IRC or Internet relay chat.\"'' In this case, the definition of the phrase specifically excludes notable status as, if it is used at all, it appears rarely within one specific mode of communication.  If a phrase is notable then it will be referenced in places such as Wiktionary or dictionaries of Internet\/urban slang and perhaps also in print.  In this case, notablility would be conferred through repeated mentions in a veriety of media, demonstrating adoption in to popular culture.  The articles that you propose for deletion are not dictionary definitions, they are discussions of sociological and popular phenomena.  Remember, articles are submitted to Wikipedia in the knowledge that they can be edited and\/or deleted without prejudice by others.  Articles are not owned by any one person, even the author.  The GFDL licence governs this.  The only way to ensure that no one edits your material is to publish on to your own webspace.  If your article is a work-in-progress, please create a Sandbox page in order to develop it to a point at which you believe that it cannot be further improved before publication. Regards, <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :Firstly, [[Be_civil|be civil]].  Your comments above are derogatory and don't help you to put a case in any way.  Secondly, sign your comments with four tildes - ~ - in order for the recepient to respond without having to hunt around for your identity.  ''"The term is currently not used in mainstream colloquial International English, and no regional variants of it exist.  The use is mainly limited to forms of communications over the Internet, mainly IRC or Internet relay chat."'' In this case, the definition of the phrase specifically excludes notable status as, if it is used at all, it appears rarely within one specific mode of communication.  If a phrase is notable then it will be referenced in places such as Wiktionary or dictionaries of Internet/urban slang and perhaps also in print.  In this case, notablility would be conferred through repeated mentions in a veriety of media, demonstrating adoption in to popular culture.  The articles that you propose for deletion are not dictionary definitions, they are discussions of sociological and popular phenomena.  Remember, articles are submitted to Wikipedia in the knowledge that they can be edited and/or deleted without prejudice by others.  Articles are not owned by any one person, even the author.  The GFDL licence governs this.  The only way to ensure that no one edits your material is to publish on to your own webspace.  If your article is a work-in-progress, please create a Sandbox page in order to develop it to a point at which you believe that it cannot be further improved before publication. Regards, <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 21:45, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

263979 +++$+++ SiGarb +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-30 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.170195600E09 +++$+++ Hello JPS. You seem to have missed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Plantsman_Cover_June_1990.jpg this one] in your spring cleaning! But just before you sweep all the cover images to oblivion, I would like to ask you to wait a few days. I have given some reasons on the images' talk pages for retaining the small gallery. In addition to the reasons given there, they demonstrate that the title has changed, from ''The Plantsman'', to ''The New Plantsman'', and back again. I will email the editor to ask his permission to use the images. I hope that will meet with your approval. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hello JPS. You seem to have missed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Plantsman_Cover_June_1990.jpg this one] in your spring cleaning! But just before you sweep all the cover images to oblivion, I would like to ask you to wait a few days. I have given some reasons on the images' talk pages for retaining the small gallery. In addition to the reasons given there, they demonstrate that the title has changed, from ''The Plantsman'', to ''The New Plantsman'', and back again. I will email the editor to ask his permission to use the images. I hope that will meet with your approval. Cheers, [[User:SiGarb|SiGarb]] | [[User talk:SiGarb|Talk]] 14:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
263980 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263979 +++$+++ 263979 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.170196560E09 +++$+++ If you're planning on using it soon, then I'll leave it, sure.  +++$+++ :If you're planning on using it soon, then I'll leave it, sure. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

526126 +++$+++ Redux +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-30 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.154328660E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge!   +++$+++ Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge!  [[User:Redux|Redux]] 23:51, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
526127 +++$+++ Bornhj +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526126 +++$+++ 526126 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.154329500E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! [[User:Bornhj|<font color=\"#3366CC\">--'''jam'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Congratulations! [[User:Bornhj|<font color="#3366CC">--'''jam'''</font>]][[User:Bornhj/E|<font color="green">'''es'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Bornhj|(talk)]]</sup> 00:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

263983 +++$+++ PhantomS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-31 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.170274020E09 +++$+++ [[Template:Infobox British radio]] seems to be a simpler version of [[Template:Infobox Radio Show]]. Is this template really needed? -- +++$+++ [[Template:Infobox British radio]] seems to be a simpler version of [[Template:Infobox Radio Show]]. Is this template really needed? --[[User:PhantomS|PhantomS]] 12:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
263984 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263983 +++$+++ 263983 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.170276600E09 +++$+++ Grr, probably not. Feel free to merge them and nominate the newer for deletion.  +++$+++ :Grr, probably not. Feel free to merge them and nominate the newer for deletion. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

526128 +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526128 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-31 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.154335020E09 +++$+++ Congratulations.  +++$+++ Congratulations. [[User:Joelr31|Joelito]] ([[User talk:Joelr31|talk]]) 01:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
526129 +++$+++ Murcielago +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526128 +++$+++ 526128 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.154338200E09 +++$+++ Yup - Congrats! -- +++$+++ :Yup - Congrats! --[[User:Murcielago|Murcielago]] 02:30, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

263986 +++$+++ Dalejenkins +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263986 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-03 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.170550200E09 +++$+++ Check the talk page of the image, please.  +++$+++ Check the talk page of the image, please. [[User:Dalejenkins|Dalejenkins]] 16:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
263987 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263986 +++$+++ 263986 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.170552780E09 +++$+++ It seems that my colleague is doing a very good job of explaining our fair use policy to you.  +++$+++ :It seems that my colleague is doing a very good job of explaining our fair use policy to you. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

1845 +++$+++ Vrubel's Demons +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-20 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.266722040E09 +++$+++ There has been a discussion on the talk page and at WP:FILM and consensus seems to be to include the television films. There are articles for some of these, so at least those with an article should be included, but then it would be awkward to randomly exclude those television films which do not yet have an article. Note also that the essay you cited on WP:FILM is just that, an essay and not policy or a guideline.  +++$+++ There has been a discussion on the talk page and at WP:FILM and consensus seems to be to include the television films. There are articles for some of these, so at least those with an article should be included, but then it would be awkward to randomly exclude those television films which do not yet have an article. Note also that the essay you cited on WP:FILM is just that, an essay and not policy or a guideline. [[User:Vrubel&#39;s Demons|Демоны Врубеля/Vrubel&#39;s Demons]] ([[User talk:Vrubel&#39;s Demons|talk]]) 19:14, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
1846 +++$+++ Vrubel's Demons +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1845 +++$+++ 1845 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.266722400E09 +++$+++ I do not know whether anyone was aware of this essay, but even this essay only says that \"Red links should be avoided\", not that Red links are not allowed. In any case you also removed links to existing articles, and it is quite clear that most if not all redlinks in the template have the potential to be developed into an article.  +++$+++ : I do not know whether anyone was aware of this essay, but even this essay only says that "Red links should be avoided", not that Red links are not allowed. In any case you also removed links to existing articles, and it is quite clear that most if not all redlinks in the template have the potential to be developed into an article. [[User:Vrubel&#39;s Demons|Демоны Врубеля/Vrubel&#39;s Demons]] ([[User talk:Vrubel&#39;s Demons|talk]]) 19:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
1847 +++$+++ Vrubel's Demons +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1845 +++$+++ 1846 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.266723000E09 +++$+++ Most of the red links have articles, some of them quite detailed and including third-party sources, on the German Wikipedia. So that alone indicates some notability. That no one has created them so far is not a reason, there is no deadline here and removing the redlinks makes it less likely that anyone will ever develop them into article. If you are unhappy with the template try to get a new consensus about the inclusion of television films.  +++$+++ :: Most of the red links have articles, some of them quite detailed and including third-party sources, on the German Wikipedia. So that alone indicates some notability. That no one has created them so far is not a reason, there is no deadline here and removing the redlinks makes it less likely that anyone will ever develop them into article. If you are unhappy with the template try to get a new consensus about the inclusion of television films. [[User:Vrubel&#39;s Demons|Демоны Врубеля/Vrubel&#39;s Demons]] ([[User talk:Vrubel&#39;s Demons|talk]]) 19:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

611977 +++$+++ 3bulletproof16 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-09 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.184025840E09 +++$+++ My MSN messenger name is bulletproof3_16@hotmail.com. Please contact me as soon as possible. --  +++$+++ My MSN messenger name is bulletproof3_16@hotmail.com. Please contact me as soon as possible. -- [[User:3bulletproof16|<font color="blue">'''bullet'''</font><font color="green">'''proof'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:3bulletproof16|<font color="black">'''3:16'''</font>]]</sup> 17:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
611978 +++$+++ 3bulletproof16 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611977 +++$+++ 611977 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.184028720E09 +++$+++ Not to worry. I will contact you shortly then. --  +++$+++ :Not to worry. I will contact you shortly then. -- [[User:3bulletproof16|<font color="blue">'''bullet'''</font><font color="green">'''proof'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:3bulletproof16|<font color="black">'''3:16'''</font>]]</sup> 17:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

567449 +++$+++ Rebelguys2 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567449 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-01 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.175416680E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:209.78.98.27&diff=119386011&oldid=119385768 Why not]? Most likely, the arning doesn't apply to the person currently at that IP. And it's of little use to blocking administrators, as we don't block based on old warnings, and we can see evidence of serious past vandalism in the block log. Not to mention, in this case, the warning templates are completely misused and inappropriate, as we really shouldn't be giving 3 last warning templates in a row. &mdash; ''' +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:209.78.98.27&diff=119386011&oldid=119385768 Why not]? Most likely, the arning doesn't apply to the person currently at that IP. And it's of little use to blocking administrators, as we don't block based on old warnings, and we can see evidence of serious past vandalism in the block log. Not to mention, in this case, the warning templates are completely misused and inappropriate, as we really shouldn't be giving 3 last warning templates in a row. &mdash; '''[[User:Rebelguys2|Rebelguys2]]''' <sup><font color="#CC5500">[[User talk:Rebelguys2|talk]]</font></sup> 01:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
567450 +++$+++ Rebelguys2 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567449 +++$+++ 567449 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.175419740E09 +++$+++ Done. Please remember that it is generally recommended that we substitute warning templates, like so: <nowiki>{{subst:uw-test1}}<\/nowiki>. Please see [[Wikipedia:Template substitution]]. Thanks. &mdash; ''' +++$+++ :Done. Please remember that it is generally recommended that we substitute warning templates, like so: <nowiki>{{subst:uw-test1}}</nowiki>. Please see [[Wikipedia:Template substitution]]. Thanks. &mdash; '''[[User:Rebelguys2|Rebelguys2]]''' <sup><font color="#CC5500">[[User talk:Rebelguys2|talk]]</font></sup> 02:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
567451 +++$+++ Rebelguys2 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567449 +++$+++ 567450 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.175419980E09 +++$+++ Congratulations. Make it worthwhile. &mdash; ''' +++$+++ ::Congratulations. Make it worthwhile. &mdash; '''[[User:Rebelguys2|Rebelguys2]]''' <sup><font color="#CC5500">[[User talk:Rebelguys2|talk]]</font></sup> 02:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

263993 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-04 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.170636660E09 +++$+++ Hi there, I'm currently considering making a wikiproject called Wikipedia:WikiProject Tyne and Wear and I'm just wondering if you would be interested in joining if and when I'ts created as I noticed from a user category you live in Newcastle-Upon-Tyne. It would be all about improving and creating wikipedia articles relating to Tyne and Wear. If you have any questions, comments or would like to show interest then please tell me on my talk page and if you know any other users who maybe interested in joining please feel free to tell them as it will need a few members in order to make it run smoothly. I will also be willing to create the project page and templates etc if there are enough active members. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi there, I'm currently considering making a wikiproject called Wikipedia:WikiProject Tyne and Wear and I'm just wondering if you would be interested in joining if and when I'ts created as I noticed from a user category you live in Newcastle-Upon-Tyne. It would be all about improving and creating wikipedia articles relating to Tyne and Wear. If you have any questions, comments or would like to show interest then please tell me on my talk page and if you know any other users who maybe interested in joining please feel free to tell them as it will need a few members in order to make it run smoothly. I will also be willing to create the project page and templates etc if there are enough active members. Thanks. [[User:Tellyaddict|<b><font color="#DD0000"><font color="#0066FF">Telly]][[user talk:tellyaddict|<b><font color="#66ff33">addict]]<sup>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Tellyaddict|<font color="red">Editor review!]]</font></sup></font> 16:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
263994 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263993 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.170776700E09 +++$+++ It could work, but usually Projects work best for larger subject areas. I've seen lots of time wasted on small topics, like ''Fawlty Towers'', etc., where people spend ages creating a project, templates, tag all the talk pages with tag pages, etc., and very little ends up being done to the articles that normal editing couldn't have done.  +++$+++ ::It could work, but usually Projects work best for larger subject areas. I've seen lots of time wasted on small topics, like ''Fawlty Towers'', etc., where people spend ages creating a project, templates, tag all the talk pages with tag pages, etc., and very little ends up being done to the articles that normal editing couldn't have done. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 07:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

263996 +++$+++ Kogsquinge +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263996 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-06 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.170761400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Kogsquinge|Kogsquinge]] 03:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
263997 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263996 +++$+++ 263996 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 07:37:00 +++$+++ 1.170776220E09 +++$+++ No. Many of your images fair [[WP:FUC|FUC]] #1.  +++$+++ :No. Many of your images fair [[WP:FUC|FUC]] #1. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 07:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

1853 +++$+++ Are You The Cow Of Pain? +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1853 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-22 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.274574540E09 +++$+++ I imagine that you must have some reason for continually removing films directed by James Whale from the template for films directed by James Whale. However, seeing as they are, in fact, films directed by James Whale I can't imagine that it is a very good reason. Please stop removing Whale-directed films from the template. Thank you.  +++$+++ I imagine that you must have some reason for continually removing films directed by James Whale from the template for films directed by James Whale. However, seeing as they are, in fact, films directed by James Whale I can't imagine that it is a very good reason. Please stop removing Whale-directed films from the template. Thank you. [[User:Are You The Cow Of Pain?|Are You The Cow Of Pain?]] ([[User talk:Are You The Cow Of Pain?|talk]]) 17:29, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
1854 +++$+++ Are You The Cow Of Pain? +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1853 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-05-22 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.274574780E09 +++$+++ Um gee, how about checking the [[WP:RS|sources]] at [[James Whale]]?  +++$+++ :* Um gee, how about checking the [[WP:RS|sources]] at [[James Whale]]? [[User:Are You The Cow Of Pain?|Are You The Cow Of Pain?]] ([[User talk:Are You The Cow Of Pain?|talk]]) 17:33, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
1855 +++$+++ Are You The Cow Of Pain? +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1853 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-05-22 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.274575200E09 +++$+++ Take three seconds and search Google. Is the [http:\/\/movies.nytimes.com\/movie\/296440\/Hello-out-There\/overview New York Times] sufficient to establish Whale's direction of ''Hello Out There''? Is [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=OKMqAQAAIAAJ&q=%22james+whale%22+%22personnel+placement%22&dq=%22james+whale%22+%22personnel+placement%22&hl=en&ei=ehb4S5jaCob2NYCk7N8F&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA this] sufficient to establish he directed the training film? Instead of blindly and stupidly reverting edits based on the thoroughly UNreliable IMDB, maybe in future it wouldn't be too much trouble for you to, you know, look at a single Wikipedia article in which Whale's directorship of these films is clearly established by reliable sources.  +++$+++ ::* Take three seconds and search Google. Is the [http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/296440/Hello-out-There/overview New York Times] sufficient to establish Whale's direction of ''Hello Out There''? Is [http://books.google.com/books?id=OKMqAQAAIAAJ&q=%22james+whale%22+%22personnel+placement%22&dq=%22james+whale%22+%22personnel+placement%22&hl=en&ei=ehb4S5jaCob2NYCk7N8F&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA this] sufficient to establish he directed the training film? Instead of blindly and stupidly reverting edits based on the thoroughly UNreliable IMDB, maybe in future it wouldn't be too much trouble for you to, you know, look at a single Wikipedia article in which Whale's directorship of these films is clearly established by reliable sources. [[User:Are You The Cow Of Pain?|Are You The Cow Of Pain?]] ([[User talk:Are You The Cow Of Pain?|talk]]) 17:40, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

263999 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263999 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-11 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.171229100E09 +++$+++ I saw that you delinked the heds for individual entries. While I dislike linked heds too, how are we then to link to individual articles on these (which I always thought was the point of lists)? (I personally thought whoever did that originally was a little bit too well-meaning). Should we go back to having, say, a bulleted list?  +++$+++ I saw that you delinked the heds for individual entries. While I dislike linked heds too, how are we then to link to individual articles on these (which I always thought was the point of lists)? (I personally thought whoever did that originally was a little bit too well-meaning). Should we go back to having, say, a bulleted list? [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] 13:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
264000 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263999 +++$+++ 263999 +++$+++ 2007-02-11 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.171229700E09 +++$+++ To be honest, I was disambiguating using AWB at the time (''Scrubs'', I think), and the program automatically delinked the headings. AWB does general clean-ups like that automatically to conform to the manual of style. Looking at the article, perhaps a bullet list would be more concise.  +++$+++ :To be honest, I was disambiguating using AWB at the time (''Scrubs'', I think), and the program automatically delinked the headings. AWB does general clean-ups like that automatically to conform to the manual of style. Looking at the article, perhaps a bullet list would be more concise. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

526145 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526145 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-03 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.154598360E09 +++$+++ It seems as if the storm is not headed for Puerto Rico.  I just spoke to my wife's aunt overthere.  I've been living in Az. for the past 17 years so all I get is \"heat\".  However, my family receives the WAPA TV (Puerto Rican Channel) and the islands newspaper.  Thanks for the concern.   +++$+++ It seems as if the storm is not headed for Puerto Rico.  I just spoke to my wife's aunt overthere.  I've been living in Az. for the past 17 years so all I get is "heat".  However, my family receives the WAPA TV (Puerto Rican Channel) and the islands newspaper.  Thanks for the concern.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
526146 +++$+++ Oldwildbill +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526145 +++$+++ 526145 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.154784360E09 +++$+++ Congrats on the GA. Keep up the good work.-- +++$+++ *Congrats on the GA. Keep up the good work.--[[User:Oldwildbill|Oldwildbill]] 06:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

264002 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.171669920E09 +++$+++ Hello. Per your vote at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of Deaths in Scream]], could I please draw your attention to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Deaths in Final Destination 3|this multiple AFD]]. Cheers.  +++$+++ Hello. Per your vote at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Deaths in Scream]], could I please draw your attention to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deaths in Final Destination 3|this multiple AFD]]. Cheers. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
264003 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264002 +++$+++ 264002 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.171670100E09 +++$+++ Done! <font color=\"#FF8000\"> +++$+++ :Done! <font color="#FF8000">[[User:Jobjörn|Jobjörn]]</font> ([[User talk:Jobjörn|Talk]] ° [[Special:Contributions/Jobj%C3%B6rn|contribs]]) 15:55, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

526147 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-03 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.154599740E09 +++$+++ Oh, I know it wasn't a slight.  You know that you're my right hand man here.  He did write some really nice stuff up there.  What I like the best is that he said \"It would be a goldmine for me if it was my Dad's unit\", I let him know that it was my unit.  Wow, can you imagine, it will be the first unit history they've approved?  +++$+++ Oh, I know it wasn't a slight.  You know that you're my right hand man here.  He did write some really nice stuff up there.  What I like the best is that he said "It would be a goldmine for me if it was my Dad's unit", I let him know that it was my unit.  Wow, can you imagine, it will be the first unit history they've approved? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
526148 +++$+++ CTSWyneken +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526147 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.154631960E09 +++$+++ I'll keep it on the watch list. My speech and debate judge instincts are kicking in with these GAs. I kind of like to watch over my contestants. 8-) By the way, there is at least one more unit page on the GA nom list. If you are not involved in it, please consider doing the GA review for it. If you'd rather not, wade into the thing yourself and help it where you can (if it needs it). Thanks! Bob --<b><font style=\"font-family: Andale Mono IPA\" color=\"navy\"> +++$+++ :: I'll keep it on the watch list. My speech and debate judge instincts are kicking in with these GAs. I kind of like to watch over my contestants. 8-) By the way, there is at least one more unit page on the GA nom list. If you are not involved in it, please consider doing the GA review for it. If you'd rather not, wade into the thing yourself and help it where you can (if it needs it). Thanks! Bob --<b><font style="font-family: Andale Mono IPA" color="navy">[[User:CTSWyneken|CTS]]</font></b><font style="font-family: Andale Mono IPA" color="maroon">Wyneken</font><sup><font style="font-family: Andale Mono IPA" color="maroon">[[User talk:CTSWyneken|(talk)]]</font></sup> 12:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

264004 +++$+++ Noroton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.171677240E09 +++$+++ I just contributed to the other violence porn AfD you set up (with my usual reserve and diffidence). Thanks. I expect the fans of these will come out and support them and win, but it's a good effort. +++$+++ I just contributed to the other violence porn AfD you set up (with my usual reserve and diffidence). Thanks. I expect the fans of these will come out and support them and win, but it's a good effort.[[User:Noroton|Noroton]] 17:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
264005 +++$+++ Noroton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264004 +++$+++ 264004 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.171684020E09 +++$+++ Hideous? Well, I'd reserve that word for the detailed glorifying of the gore. Poor taste. At some point a sentence mentioning all the deaths would be useful for a parent wondering whether a horror video isn't too bad for a 'tween, I guess. I want to look into what kind of Wikipedia rule actually prevents porn or obviously disgusting things from being put on the site. I suspect it's just the idea that it's \"unencyclopedic\". One thing that really shocked me was that some of these nominated articles have category links to \"deaths\" categories that also include real deaths. I don't understand what's going through the minds of these editors. For instance, why detail the gore in the first place? Why link film or TV deaths in a category with real deaths? Kind of scary.  +++$+++ :Hideous? Well, I'd reserve that word for the detailed glorifying of the gore. Poor taste. At some point a sentence mentioning all the deaths would be useful for a parent wondering whether a horror video isn't too bad for a 'tween, I guess. I want to look into what kind of Wikipedia rule actually prevents porn or obviously disgusting things from being put on the site. I suspect it's just the idea that it's "unencyclopedic". One thing that really shocked me was that some of these nominated articles have category links to "deaths" categories that also include real deaths. I don't understand what's going through the minds of these editors. For instance, why detail the gore in the first place? Why link film or TV deaths in a category with real deaths? Kind of scary. [[User:Noroton|Noroton]] 19:47, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
264006 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264004 +++$+++ 264004 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.171842060E09 +++$+++ Robert Benfer clearly fails [[WP:BIO]]. [[Brooke Brodack]] doesn't. Plus, Benfer hads already been deleted by consensus gained at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Robert Benfer]].  +++$+++ :Robert Benfer clearly fails [[WP:BIO]]. [[Brooke Brodack]] doesn't. Plus, Benfer hads already been deleted by consensus gained at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Benfer]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
264007 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264004 +++$+++ 264004 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.171847340E09 +++$+++ Hello. It was deleted because it fails our notability guides. Deleting the article was the only way to improve it, in this case, until the site gets a lot of independent attention (notable awards, articles about it in real magazines, etc -- forum posts don't count).  +++$+++ :Hello. It was deleted because it fails our notability guides. Deleting the article was the only way to improve it, in this case, until the site gets a lot of independent attention (notable awards, articles about it in real magazines, etc -- forum posts don't count). [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

526149 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-04 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.154684220E09 +++$+++ How do those new admin. buttons look on your page?  Bet they look nice!  Have you heard from your source anything about De Castro?  Semper Fi.  +++$+++ How do those new admin. buttons look on your page?  Bet they look nice!  Have you heard from your source anything about De Castro?  Semper Fi. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
526150 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526149 +++$+++ 526149 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.154686740E09 +++$+++ Yep, I have checked out the portal.  Some great images.  But, the thing is that I'm always learning something new.  I mean, that Sgt. Owens died on his first day of combat.  You know, you never know how you're going to act in a certain situation.  Sometimes the real heroes are the people you least expect.  That's why I've always told my kids (when they were kids) never worship nor consider sports personalities or celebreties as heros.  A hero is a person who is willing to give up all he or she's got to save someone elses life, even if that means sacrificing their own life and does it without expecting any kind of adoration.   +++$+++ * Yep, I have checked out the portal.  Some great images.  But, the thing is that I'm always learning something new.  I mean, that Sgt. Owens died on his first day of combat.  You know, you never know how you're going to act in a certain situation.  Sometimes the real heroes are the people you least expect.  That's why I've always told my kids (when they were kids) never worship nor consider sports personalities or celebreties as heros.  A hero is a person who is willing to give up all he or she's got to save someone elses life, even if that means sacrificing their own life and does it without expecting any kind of adoration.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:19, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

1863 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-30 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.283153280E09 +++$+++ Please do not revert me without an edit summary. It is a waste of space to have one film for each decade in the Paul Greengrass template. Erik ( +++$+++ Please do not revert me without an edit summary. It is a waste of space to have one film for each decade in the Paul Greengrass template. Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 00:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
1864 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1863 +++$+++ 1863 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.285816320E09 +++$+++ Director templates do not need to be consistent by breaking down by decade. If you have an example like [[Template:Paul Greengrass]], there will be mostly-empty lines where the directed works can be better grouped together. I'll be watchlisting where I fix templates to avoid such empty lines. Erik ( +++$+++ :Director templates do not need to be consistent by breaking down by decade. If you have an example like [[Template:Paul Greengrass]], there will be mostly-empty lines where the directed works can be better grouped together. I'll be watchlisting where I fix templates to avoid such empty lines. Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 20:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
1865 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1863 +++$+++ 1864 +++$+++ 2010-10-02 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.286062860E09 +++$+++ Please do not add mostly-empty lines to director templates. It is possible to be \"consistent\" to a fault. Erik ( +++$+++ ::Please do not add mostly-empty lines to director templates. It is possible to be "consistent" to a fault. Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 16:41, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
1866 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1863 +++$+++ 1865 +++$+++ 2010-10-02 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.286063280E09 +++$+++ [[WT:FILM#Director templates]]. Erik ( +++$+++ :::[[WT:FILM#Director templates]]. Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 16:48, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

526152 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-05 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.154762340E09 +++$+++ So, now that you've settled into your new adminship, have you had a chance to give any more thought to running for [[WP:MILHIST]] coordinator? :-)  +++$+++ So, now that you've settled into your new adminship, have you had a chance to give any more thought to running for [[WP:MILHIST]] coordinator? :-) [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 00:19, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
526153 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526152 +++$+++ 526152 +++$+++ 2006-08-14 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.155547260E09 +++$+++ Ah, ok; I was worried that my pestering had offended you :-)  +++$+++ :Ah, ok; I was worried that my pestering had offended you :-) [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 02:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

264009 +++$+++ The Mink Ermine Fox +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-21 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.172103780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:The Mink Ermine Fox|The Mink Ermine Fox]] 16:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
264010 +++$+++ Wallywall +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.172122200E09 +++$+++ The way to help solve this problem is not to demand inclusion for yet MORE pages with no notability on the grounds that others were included, but rather to tag and identify those that already exist, so that Wikipedia can increase its quality day by day. If you know of any articles with no notability please tag them.  +++$+++ :The way to help solve this problem is not to demand inclusion for yet MORE pages with no notability on the grounds that others were included, but rather to tag and identify those that already exist, so that Wikipedia can increase its quality day by day. If you know of any articles with no notability please tag them. [[User:Wallywall|Wallywall]] 21:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
264011 +++$+++ The Mink Ermine Fox +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 264010 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.172126580E09 +++$+++ Alright, I went through the notability articles and found the \"Inclusion Is Not...\" page. I freely admit that I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, and I therefore retract my former comparison. I had taken the existence of these other pages to be essentially a de facto declaration of validity. That said, I do feel that Xyllomer is a notable MUD despite not being a \"major\" MUD - it is consistently rated in the top 20 on Top MUD Sites; it originated as a sociological experiment at the University of Paderborn that decidedly grew beyond its simple experimental confines; and under the name PaderMUD was in fact the first production MUD to use Dworkin's Generic Driver. None of this was included in the page, of course, which was probably a mistake. I find that noteworthy, but as I mentioned I'm new to the Wikipedia game and therefore can't really trust my feeling on the matter. So I will certainly accept if JPS disagrees, and not bother him further. Hopefully (as one friend cautioned me) there's no insult taken here.  +++$+++ ::Alright, I went through the notability articles and found the "Inclusion Is Not..." page. I freely admit that I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, and I therefore retract my former comparison. I had taken the existence of these other pages to be essentially a de facto declaration of validity. That said, I do feel that Xyllomer is a notable MUD despite not being a "major" MUD - it is consistently rated in the top 20 on Top MUD Sites; it originated as a sociological experiment at the University of Paderborn that decidedly grew beyond its simple experimental confines; and under the name PaderMUD was in fact the first production MUD to use Dworkin's Generic Driver. None of this was included in the page, of course, which was probably a mistake. I find that noteworthy, but as I mentioned I'm new to the Wikipedia game and therefore can't really trust my feeling on the matter. So I will certainly accept if JPS disagrees, and not bother him further. Hopefully (as one friend cautioned me) there's no insult taken here. [[User:The Mink Ermine Fox|The Mink Ermine Fox]] 22:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
264012 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.172248980E09 +++$+++ I have already explained. References are our friend. They should be in every section; ideally in every paragraph. The IMDb is not always considered in high regard by editors. If we are striving for FA status then IMDb wil cause it to fail. Please do not remove them again. Removing references could be construed as vandalism.  +++$+++ :I have already explained. References are our friend. They should be in every section; ideally in every paragraph. The IMDb is not always considered in high regard by editors. If we are striving for FA status then IMDb wil cause it to fail. Please do not remove them again. Removing references could be construed as vandalism. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
264013 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.172279700E09 +++$+++ You are removing reliable references whilst keeping unreliable ones there. It is good news that you are not going to change it again. Another editor, according to the edit history, was confused over your removal.  +++$+++ :You are removing reliable references whilst keeping unreliable ones there. It is good news that you are not going to change it again. Another editor, according to the edit history, was confused over your removal. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
264014 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.172294100E09 +++$+++ No, the reason it's looked down upon is that it is often poorly referenced and can be (temporarily) inaccurate. My own undergraduate students are marked down if they use Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :No, the reason it's looked down upon is that it is often poorly referenced and can be (temporarily) inaccurate. My own undergraduate students are marked down if they use Wikipedia. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
264015 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.172297040E09 +++$+++ My reasons for editing Wikipedia are personal and are not related to my work. I teach in an institution of higher education.  +++$+++ :My reasons for editing Wikipedia are personal and are not related to my work. I teach in an institution of higher education. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
264016 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.172304240E09 +++$+++ Ah, I thought you'd get back to a simple personal attack at some point. And you complain about why you've been given less credance than established users.  +++$+++ :Ah, I thought you'd get back to a simple personal attack at some point. And you complain about why you've been given less credance than established users. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 00:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
264017 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.172350260E09 +++$+++ I think it's past your bedtime.  +++$+++ :I think it's past your bedtime. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
264018 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.172350440E09 +++$+++ Ah, did I now. Great argument.  +++$+++ :Ah, did I now. Great argument. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
264019 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 264009 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.172350620E09 +++$+++ Interesting. Your wit impresses greatly.  +++$+++ :Interesting. Your wit impresses greatly. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

526154 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-05 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.154763660E09 +++$+++ I'm working on a Template to post on 2\/9.  I'm inviting you to take a look.  I think it'll look good on the article. [[User:Marine 69-71\/Sandbox See Here!]].  Semper Fi  +++$+++ I'm working on a Template to post on 2/9.  I'm inviting you to take a look.  I think it'll look good on the article. [[User:Marine 69-71/Sandbox See Here!]].  Semper Fi [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:41, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
526155 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526154 +++$+++ 526154 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.154767440E09 +++$+++ i like your version better.  I'm going to work on a \"rack\" version as suggested by Looper, then I'll tell you guys so, that we can decide on the version which will cause the least distraction.  Semper Fi  +++$+++ * i like your version better.  I'm going to work on a "rack" version as suggested by Looper, then I'll tell you guys so, that we can decide on the version which will cause the least distraction.  Semper Fi [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:44, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

1867 +++$+++ Lithistman +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-11 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.284249780E09 +++$+++ This ''is'' a Bob Clark film. It's not well-known that it is, but in ''ClarkWORLD'', a documentary about him, it's made very clear that he was the director of this film.  +++$+++ This ''is'' a Bob Clark film. It's not well-known that it is, but in ''ClarkWORLD'', a documentary about him, it's made very clear that he was the director of this film. [[User:Lithistman|Lithistman]] ([[User talk:Lithistman|talk]]) 17:03, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
1868 +++$+++ Lithistman +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1867 +++$+++ 1867 +++$+++ 2010-09-11 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.284251280E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'm watching ClarkWORLD '''right now'''. The documentary makes it VERY clear that B & B was filmed shortly before his death, and released after he had died. A documentary about the man is a ''far'' more reliable source than IMDB. Please quit reverting the movie out of the template.  +++$+++ :Okay, I'm watching ClarkWORLD '''right now'''. The documentary makes it VERY clear that B & B was filmed shortly before his death, and released after he had died. A documentary about the man is a ''far'' more reliable source than IMDB. Please quit reverting the movie out of the template. [[User:Lithistman|Lithistman]] ([[User talk:Lithistman|talk]]) 17:28, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

466140 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ Prolog +++$+++ 466140 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-27 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.301231520E09 +++$+++ Could you create the redirect for [[Cloud atlas (film)]] to [[Cloud Atlas (novel)#Film adaptation]], or shall I? ''' +++$+++ Could you create the redirect for [[Cloud atlas (film)]] to [[Cloud Atlas (novel)#Film adaptation]], or shall I? '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 06:12, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
466141 +++$+++ Prolog +++$+++ Prolog +++$+++ 466140 +++$+++ 466140 +++$+++ 2011-03-27 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.301261460E09 +++$+++ I created the redirect when I closed the AFD, using the correct capitalization: [[Cloud Atlas (film)]].  +++$+++ :I created the redirect when I closed the AFD, using the correct capitalization: [[Cloud Atlas (film)]]. [[User:Prolog|Prolog]] ([[User talk:Prolog#top|talk]]) 14:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
466142 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ Prolog +++$+++ 466140 +++$+++ 466141 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.301333700E09 +++$+++ Oops. I should have realized the spelling issue before writing. Thanks. ''' +++$+++ ::Oops. I should have realized the spelling issue before writing. Thanks. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 10:35, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
466143 +++$+++ Prolog +++$+++ Prolog +++$+++ 466140 +++$+++ 466140 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.304218620E09 +++$+++ I can't block the \/16 ranges. There would be way too much collateral damage. I've blocked 180.194.28.0\/22, which seems to have been the vandal's main range recently, for four days. Even that range is pretty active, unfortunately. I would need some IPs to calculate further rangeblocks.  +++$+++ :I can't block the /16 ranges. There would be way too much collateral damage. I've blocked 180.194.28.0/22, which seems to have been the vandal's main range recently, for four days. Even that range is pretty active, unfortunately. I would need some IPs to calculate further rangeblocks. [[User:Prolog|Prolog]] ([[User talk:Prolog#top|talk]]) 19:57, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
466144 +++$+++ Kungfu2187 +++$+++ Prolog +++$+++ 466140 +++$+++ 466143 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.304240700E09 +++$+++ Here you go. Please set in 2 1\/2 weeks to 1 month. -- +++$+++ ::Here you go. Please set in 2 1/2 weeks to 1 month. --[[User:Kungfu2187|Kungfu2187]] ([[User talk:Kungfu2187|talk]]) 02:05, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
466145 +++$+++ Prolog +++$+++ Prolog +++$+++ 466140 +++$+++ 466144 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.304302500E09 +++$+++ Those ranges don't seem correct. For example, 112.198.0.0\/22 has no edits at all and 124.6.0.0\/22 no edits since June 2010. You can try the [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~chm\/blockcalc.php rangeblock calculator], or list individual IP addresses here and I'll calculate the ranges.  +++$+++ :::Those ranges don't seem correct. For example, 112.198.0.0/22 has no edits at all and 124.6.0.0/22 no edits since June 2010. You can try the [http://toolserver.org/~chm/blockcalc.php rangeblock calculator], or list individual IP addresses here and I'll calculate the ranges. [[User:Prolog|Prolog]] ([[User talk:Prolog#top|talk]]) 19:15, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

1869 +++$+++ Propaniac +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1869 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-20 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.285016520E09 +++$+++ Stop removing the Up series from the template. I don't know what the hell your problem is with the series or with using edit summaries, but even if you did bother to explain yourself I highly doubt there's any justification for removing it.  +++$+++ Stop removing the Up series from the template. I don't know what the hell your problem is with the series or with using edit summaries, but even if you did bother to explain yourself I highly doubt there's any justification for removing it. [[User:Propaniac|Propaniac]] ([[User talk:Propaniac|talk]]) 14:02, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
1870 +++$+++ Propaniac +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1869 +++$+++ 1869 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.285016760E09 +++$+++ Jeez, after looking at the rest of your Talk page, is it your mission statement to randomly delete movies from director templates?  +++$+++ :Jeez, after looking at the rest of your Talk page, is it your mission statement to randomly delete movies from director templates? [[User:Propaniac|Propaniac]] ([[User talk:Propaniac|talk]]) 14:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
1871 +++$+++ Propaniac +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1869 +++$+++ 1870 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.285627380E09 +++$+++ They're films that premiere on TV. Nobody on Earth classifies them as a TV series instead of a film series. Perhaps someone could have informed you of that earlier, if you'd mentioned in an edit summary that you were removing it because of a mistaken belief that it's a TV series.  +++$+++ ::They're films that premiere on TV. Nobody on Earth classifies them as a TV series instead of a film series. Perhaps someone could have informed you of that earlier, if you'd mentioned in an edit summary that you were removing it because of a mistaken belief that it's a TV series. [[User:Propaniac|Propaniac]] ([[User talk:Propaniac|talk]]) 15:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

526159 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-05 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.154795640E09 +++$+++ Take a look now, I need input.  +++$+++ Take a look now, I need input. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 09:34, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
526160 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526159 +++$+++ 526159 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.154811300E09 +++$+++ Dude, thanks for cleaning up my references\/notes on the [[15th MEU]].  I am terrible at those things.  I promise that someday I will take the time to learn how to do them correctly.  Cheers.-- +++$+++ * Dude, thanks for cleaning up my references/notes on the [[15th MEU]].  I am terrible at those things.  I promise that someday I will take the time to learn how to do them correctly.  Cheers.--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 13:55, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
526161 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526159 +++$+++ 526160 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.154813820E09 +++$+++ I am off to the rack.  I will add more in a few hours.  I have no doubt that we can get all of the requisite cites needed for the 15th MEU page.  Yut-- +++$+++ ** I am off to the rack.  I will add more in a few hours.  I have no doubt that we can get all of the requisite cites needed for the 15th MEU page.  Yut--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 14:37, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

393528 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ PaulWicks +++$+++ 393528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-05 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.238991540E09 +++$+++ BTW: how much do you know about epileptic seizures wrt neurons and stuff? Enough to check something over and review? I'm not ready yet, but maybe later?  +++$+++ BTW: how much do you know about epileptic seizures wrt neurons and stuff? Enough to check something over and review? I'm not ready yet, but maybe later? [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
393529 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ PaulWicks +++$+++ 393528 +++$+++ 393528 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.238992920E09 +++$+++ I'll reply over on my talk page.  +++$+++ :I'll reply over on my talk page. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

264020 +++$+++ Drini +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264020 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.172272380E09 +++$+++ Why was [[Jonathen Cornelius]] deleted? I see many people editing it, so I have doubts that A7 applies. And now the guy is requesting the same deletion at other wikis, so I'd like to check the background. -- <small>  +++$+++ Why was [[Jonathen Cornelius]] deleted? I see many people editing it, so I have doubts that A7 applies. And now the guy is requesting the same deletion at other wikis, so I'd like to check the background. -- <small> [[User talk:Drini|Drini]]</small> 15:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
264021 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264020 +++$+++ 264020 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.172294100E09 +++$+++ I'm confused... trying to get my head around what happened...  +++$+++ :I'm confused... trying to get my head around what happened... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
264022 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264020 +++$+++ 264020 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.172294400E09 +++$+++ OK, I've undeleted it. I can see why I deleted under A7, though (if was mentioned in his associate's AFD). There's no real assertion of notability.  +++$+++ :OK, I've undeleted it. I can see why I deleted under A7, though (if was mentioned in his associate's AFD). There's no real assertion of notability. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

526166 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526166 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-06 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.154912460E09 +++$+++ I saw your query on Tony's talkpage.  According to the official congressional website, H.R. 3440 passed the House by voice vote on March 28, 2006.  It passed the Senate by unanimous consent on June 20, 2006, and was signed into law by the President on August 1, 2006.  It's now Public Law 109-253.  Hope this is helpful.   +++$+++ I saw your query on Tony's talkpage.  According to the official congressional website, H.R. 3440 passed the House by voice vote on March 28, 2006.  It passed the Senate by unanimous consent on June 20, 2006, and was signed into law by the President on August 1, 2006.  It's now Public Law 109-253.  Hope this is helpful.  [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 18:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
526167 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526166 +++$+++ 526166 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.154913780E09 +++$+++ Go to <www.thomas.gov> and enter the bill information.  +++$+++ : Go to <www.thomas.gov> and enter the bill information. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 18:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

264023 +++$+++ Noroton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-24 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.172368260E09 +++$+++ Well, that surprised me. A 7-6 vote and the result is \"delete\" &mdash; I like it! If any similar votes come up, feel free to tell me about them. Thanks for your work on this.  +++$+++ Well, that surprised me. A 7-6 vote and the result is "delete" &mdash; I like it! If any similar votes come up, feel free to tell me about them. Thanks for your work on this. [[User:Noroton|Noroton]] 17:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
264024 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264023 +++$+++ 264023 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.172368620E09 +++$+++ Yeah, thanks for your support. The closing admin looks at the quality of arguments rather than just the numbers: votes like the '''KEEP KEEP KEEP''', or reasons like \"don't delete cause we've had it a while\" wasn't helping their case. We'll just have to make sure that those sodding 'deaths' section are kept out. It's usually anons who add them.  +++$+++ :Yeah, thanks for your support. The closing admin looks at the quality of arguments rather than just the numbers: votes like the '''KEEP KEEP KEEP''', or reasons like "don't delete cause we've had it a while" wasn't helping their case. We'll just have to make sure that those sodding 'deaths' section are kept out. It's usually anons who add them. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

264025 +++$+++ Gungadin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264025 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-24 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.172371740E09 +++$+++ Hey JPS, can you give me some help with some images, or point me to someone who can. I had permission from a photographer on flickr to use some of his photos on wiki. I uploaded them under a free license, but the user would prefer if they were licensed for use just on that page and mentioned a creative commons tag. I'm not sure if this is possible under Wikipedia's rules, or which tag to use. Do you have any idea?  +++$+++ Hey JPS, can you give me some help with some images, or point me to someone who can. I had permission from a photographer on flickr to use some of his photos on wiki. I uploaded them under a free license, but the user would prefer if they were licensed for use just on that page and mentioned a creative commons tag. I'm not sure if this is possible under Wikipedia's rules, or which tag to use. Do you have any idea? [[User:Gungadin|Gungadin]] 18:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
264026 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264025 +++$+++ 264025 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.172373360E09 +++$+++ Mmm, you're right -- I don't think that's possible because it's restriction. It's a shame because many unfree images are being used without any permission at all. [[Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#I3]]. It's a good photo tho'.  +++$+++ :Mmm, you're right -- I don't think that's possible because it's restriction. It's a shame because many unfree images are being used without any permission at all. [[Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#I3]]. It's a good photo tho'. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
264027 +++$+++ Gungadin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264025 +++$+++ 264026 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.172374740E09 +++$+++ The author said I can keep the images on the page anyway, although he would prefer them to be restricted. +++$+++ ::The author said I can keep the images on the page anyway, although he would prefer them to be restricted.[[User:Gungadin|Gungadin]] 19:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
264028 +++$+++ AnemoneProjectors +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264025 +++$+++ 264027 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.172384280E09 +++$+++ If an image is tagged as for use on Wikipedia only, it can still be copied by anyone, which would cause a large number of copyright violations all over the internet. That's why images tagged for use on Wikipedia only are deleted. So either they'll have to allow anyone to use the image, or they can't allow it for use on Wikipedia at all. &mdash;  +++$+++ :::If an image is tagged as for use on Wikipedia only, it can still be copied by anyone, which would cause a large number of copyright violations all over the internet. That's why images tagged for use on Wikipedia only are deleted. So either they'll have to allow anyone to use the image, or they can't allow it for use on Wikipedia at all. &mdash; [[User:AnemoneProjectors|AnemoneProjectors]] <small>([[User talk:AnemoneProjectors|talk]])</small> 22:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

1884 +++$+++ Smetanahue +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-10 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.302430860E09 +++$+++ Hi, the decade breakdown in director navboxes is only for cases where it's otherwise difficult to get a proper overview of the filmography. The breakdown makes the navbox more intrusive, so when it's not absolutely necessary it should be avoided. I also highly encourage you to leave an explanaition when you revert an edit, it is confusing and bad etiquette to not communicate in such situations.  +++$+++ Hi, the decade breakdown in director navboxes is only for cases where it's otherwise difficult to get a proper overview of the filmography. The breakdown makes the navbox more intrusive, so when it's not absolutely necessary it should be avoided. I also highly encourage you to leave an explanaition when you revert an edit, it is confusing and bad etiquette to not communicate in such situations. [[User:Smetanahue|Smetanahue]] ([[User talk:Smetanahue|talk]]) 03:21, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
1885 +++$+++ Smetanahue +++$+++ TheMovieBuff +++$+++ 1884 +++$+++ 1884 +++$+++ 2011-04-17 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.303048860E09 +++$+++ Please, you need to come up with a better argument than that many film director templates have decade breakdowns. You can NOT claim that all navboxes have such divisions, because it's just not true. The very template [[Template:Wikipedia template messages|Wikipedia template messages]] has a section with three rows of links, so it's obviously not too much for a film template to have this as well. The only reason for decade breakdown is when there are so many titles that the overview becomes difficult without dividing the navbox somehow, but this is definitely not the case in the vast majority of the templates. That many navboxes of a certain type (again, not at Wikipedia at large) do something wrong is not a reason to continue doing it wrong. I will undo your reversal at [[Template:Terry Gilliam]] and I do not expect you to revert it again until you have provided at least one genuine argument here or at my talk page.  +++$+++ :Please, you need to come up with a better argument than that many film director templates have decade breakdowns. You can NOT claim that all navboxes have such divisions, because it's just not true. The very template [[Template:Wikipedia template messages|Wikipedia template messages]] has a section with three rows of links, so it's obviously not too much for a film template to have this as well. The only reason for decade breakdown is when there are so many titles that the overview becomes difficult without dividing the navbox somehow, but this is definitely not the case in the vast majority of the templates. That many navboxes of a certain type (again, not at Wikipedia at large) do something wrong is not a reason to continue doing it wrong. I will undo your reversal at [[Template:Terry Gilliam]] and I do not expect you to revert it again until you have provided at least one genuine argument here or at my talk page. [[User:Smetanahue|Smetanahue]] ([[User talk:Smetanahue|talk]]) 07:01, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

44005 +++$+++ MikeGlyer +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-04 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.291525920E09 +++$+++ Seeing as you kept the information that came from the blog yet discarded the source my curiosity was piqued, because I didn't think that was how an encyclopedia works. Thanks for your prompt answer.  +++$+++ Seeing as you kept the information that came from the blog yet discarded the source my curiosity was piqued, because I didn't think that was how an encyclopedia works. Thanks for your prompt answer. [[User:MikeGlyer|MikeGlyer]] ([[User talk:MikeGlyer|talk]]) 21:12, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
44006 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44005 +++$+++ 44005 +++$+++ 2010-12-06 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.291697040E09 +++$+++ That can go either way. The information in question didn't seem particularly controversial so I figured it was OK on its own while another source gets located.  +++$+++ :That can go either way. The information in question didn't seem particularly controversial so I figured it was OK on its own while another source gets located. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] ([[User talk:DreamGuy#top|talk]]) 20:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
44007 +++$+++ Ashley Pomeroy +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44005 +++$+++ 44006 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.294108500E09 +++$+++ Did you consider ''looking for a better source''? No, you did not. - +++$+++ ::Did you consider ''looking for a better source''? No, you did not. -[[User:Ashley Pomeroy|Ashley Pomeroy]] ([[User talk:Ashley Pomeroy|talk]]) 18:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
44008 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44005 +++$+++ 44007 +++$+++ 2011-01-21 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.295602260E09 +++$+++ So you're a mind reader now? And, who are you anyway? That's a pretty random and useless comment.  +++$+++ :::So you're a mind reader now? And, who are you anyway? That's a pretty random and useless comment. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] ([[User talk:DreamGuy#top|talk]]) 01:31, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

264032 +++$+++ Fraslet +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-07 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.173310980E09 +++$+++ The above user has reverted your recent removal of the linkspam on the Armadale, Fauldhouse and Winchburgh articles. I believe he may also now be in violation of the 3RR.  +++$+++ The above user has reverted your recent removal of the linkspam on the Armadale, Fauldhouse and Winchburgh articles. I believe he may also now be in violation of the 3RR. [[User:Fraslet|Fraslet]] 15:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
264033 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264032 +++$+++ 264032 +++$+++ 2007-03-07 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.173314100E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I've warned him about 3RR, so if he reverts again today he can be blocked.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I've warned him about 3RR, so if he reverts again today he can be blocked. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

264034 +++$+++ John Reaves +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-08 05:50:00 +++$+++ 1.173361800E09 +++$+++ Do you realize that your user page has been protected for over a month?  +++$+++ Do you realize that your user page has been protected for over a month? [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 05:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
264035 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264034 +++$+++ 264034 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.173369480E09 +++$+++ Yes, thank you.  +++$+++ :Yes, thank you. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 07:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

264036 +++$+++ BScar23625 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264036 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-09 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.173483000E09 +++$+++ JPS. I am planning a trip up there this Sunday (11\/03) unless the weather is really prohibitive. Departure time from Sunderland is around 8am. Where would you like me to pick you up from?. best wishes. Bob  +++$+++ JPS. I am planning a trip up there this Sunday (11/03) unless the weather is really prohibitive. Departure time from Sunderland is around 8am. Where would you like me to pick you up from?. best wishes. Bob [[User:BScar23625|BScar23625]] 15:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
264037 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264036 +++$+++ 264036 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.173589860E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your kind offer. Unfortunately I have family visiiting this weekend. Hope the weather is kind.  +++$+++ :Many thanks for your kind offer. Unfortunately I have family visiiting this weekend. Hope the weather is kind. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

1893 +++$+++ Timl2k4 +++$+++ Ks0stm +++$+++ 1893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.309740120E09 +++$+++ You added this to 2011 Super outbreak, but this category is hidden so it seems to provide no information when one looks at the redirect unless they click \"Edit\". -- +++$+++ You added this to 2011 Super outbreak, but this category is hidden so it seems to provide no information when one looks at the redirect unless they click "Edit". --[[User:Timl2k4|TimL]] ([[User talk:Timl2k4|talk]]) 17:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
1894 +++$+++ Ks0stm +++$+++ Ks0stm +++$+++ 1893 +++$+++ 1893 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.309747320E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I noticed that. I'm not sure quite what the reasoning behind making the category hidden was, but I just assume that if it's hidden there's a reason for it. [[w:User:Ks0stm|<font color=\"009900\" ><b>Ks0stm<\/b><\/font>]] <sup>( +++$+++ :Yeah, I noticed that. I'm not sure quite what the reasoning behind making the category hidden was, but I just assume that if it's hidden there's a reason for it. [[w:User:Ks0stm|<font color="009900" ><b>Ks0stm</b></font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Ks0stm|T]])</sup> 19:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

264038 +++$+++ BScar23625 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.173650940E09 +++$+++ JPS. You didn't miss much, there was low cloud and visibility above 500 metres was almost nil. I would have liked to meet a fellow university lecturer. best wishes Bob  +++$+++ JPS. You didn't miss much, there was low cloud and visibility above 500 metres was almost nil. I would have liked to meet a fellow university lecturer. best wishes Bob [[User:BScar23625|BScar23625]] 15:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
264039 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264038 +++$+++ 264038 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.173645960E09 +++$+++ Yes, I probably would have said the same about The Sex Pistols before they achieved our standards outlined at [[WP:MUSIC]]. Wikipedia is not mySpace. We are not here to help bands become notable. It is very unlikely that people would want to read about them at the moment. We can't have every teenager and a guitar on here.  +++$+++ :Yes, I probably would have said the same about The Sex Pistols before they achieved our standards outlined at [[WP:MUSIC]]. Wikipedia is not mySpace. We are not here to help bands become notable. It is very unlikely that people would want to read about them at the moment. We can't have every teenager and a guitar on here. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
264040 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264038 +++$+++ 264038 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.173646440E09 +++$+++ Ah, right, you're one of the billions of podcasters looking for publicity. Well, when notability is verified by several [[WP:RS|independent reliable sources]] then you can have your page.  +++$+++ :Ah, right, you're one of the billions of podcasters looking for publicity. Well, when notability is verified by several [[WP:RS|independent reliable sources]] then you can have your page. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
264041 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264038 +++$+++ 264038 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.173646740E09 +++$+++ I refer you to my last answer about independent sources. Do you have press coverage?  +++$+++ :I refer you to my last answer about independent sources. Do you have press coverage? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
264042 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264038 +++$+++ 264038 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.173647100E09 +++$+++ Notability not established then = no page. I wish you luck on your hobby.  +++$+++ :Notability not established then = no page. I wish you luck on your hobby. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
264043 +++$+++ Lexein +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264038 +++$+++ 264038 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.176068340E09 +++$+++ I agree that notability has not  '''yet''' been established: [[Wikipedia:Notability#Notability_is_not_subjective|Notability_is_not_subjective]].  Of course, as soon it is established, it is [[Wikipedia:Notability#Notability_is_generally_permanent|generally permanent]].-- +++$+++ *I agree that notability has not  '''yet''' been established: [[Wikipedia:Notability#Notability_is_not_subjective|Notability_is_not_subjective]].  Of course, as soon it is established, it is [[Wikipedia:Notability#Notability_is_generally_permanent|generally permanent]].--[[User:Lexein|Lexein]] 14:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

611985 +++$+++ Sephiroth BCR +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611985 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-24 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.185273840E09 +++$+++ As you were the one that made the character chart, and likely have the most experience with these games, could you add references to the character chart? It's likely going to become a sticking point in a GA review, and rather than remove it altogether, adding references to confirm the characters' presence would be preferable. Sourcing the game guide, instruction manual, or any other verifiable source would be fine. Furthermore, is the gameplay section simply going to be a \"general gameplay features\" section, with additional features being listed under each individual game section, or should it encompass the entire series? I would prefer the former, but I'm open to opinions. Thanks. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ As you were the one that made the character chart, and likely have the most experience with these games, could you add references to the character chart? It's likely going to become a sticking point in a GA review, and rather than remove it altogether, adding references to confirm the characters' presence would be preferable. Sourcing the game guide, instruction manual, or any other verifiable source would be fine. Furthermore, is the gameplay section simply going to be a "general gameplay features" section, with additional features being listed under each individual game section, or should it encompass the entire series? I would prefer the former, but I'm open to opinions. Thanks. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="navy">'''Sephiroth BCR'''</font>]] <sup>'''([[User talk:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="blue">Converse</font>]])'''</sup></font> 03:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
611986 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611985 +++$+++ 611985 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.185321720E09 +++$+++ As for the gameplay information, I agree with you on using the former. \/\/  +++$+++ :As for the gameplay information, I agree with you on using the former. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 17:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
611987 +++$+++ Sephiroth BCR +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611985 +++$+++ 611986 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.185323520E09 +++$+++ On the topic of the gameplay information, I would appreciate it the relevant information could be added. Copy editing can fix everything, but the information just needs to be out there. Another issue, however, is our relative inability to provide sources for gameplay or reception for the Japanese exclusive games. I suppose we could gloss over them, as it isn't absolutely necessary for a GA review, but it would be nice. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::On the topic of the gameplay information, I would appreciate it the relevant information could be added. Copy editing can fix everything, but the information just needs to be out there. Another issue, however, is our relative inability to provide sources for gameplay or reception for the Japanese exclusive games. I suppose we could gloss over them, as it isn't absolutely necessary for a GA review, but it would be nice. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="navy">'''Sephiroth BCR'''</font>]] <sup>'''([[User talk:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="blue">Converse</font>]])'''</sup></font> 17:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

1898 +++$+++ TwoMightyGods +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-23 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.214270280E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Mrlopez2681 this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags\/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 18:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> [[User:TwoMightyGods|TwoMightyGods]]<sup>[[User talk:TwoMightyGods|Persuasion]]<\/sup><sub> +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Mrlopez2681 this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 18:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> [[User:TwoMightyGods|TwoMightyGods]]<sup>[[User talk:TwoMightyGods|Persuasion]]</sup><sub>[[User:TwoMightyGods/Need to|Necessity]]</sub> 18:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
1899 +++$+++ TwoMightyGods +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1898 +++$+++ 1898 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.214359020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding the source and copyright info there :) I've removed PD-old as the photo could not have been taken by somebody who died over 100 years ago, but the source information helps to identify the image as copyright free. Regards, [[User:TwoMightyGods|TwoMightyGods]]<sup>[[User talk:TwoMightyGods|Persuasion]]<\/sup><sub> +++$+++ :Thanks for adding the source and copyright info there :) I've removed PD-old as the photo could not have been taken by somebody who died over 100 years ago, but the source information helps to identify the image as copyright free. Regards, [[User:TwoMightyGods|TwoMightyGods]]<sup>[[User talk:TwoMightyGods|Persuasion]]</sup><sub>[[User:TwoMightyGods/Need to|Necessity]]</sub> 18:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

1900 +++$+++ CouldOughta +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1900 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-30 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.214823240E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:CouldOughta|CouldOughta]] ([[User talk:CouldOughta|talk]]) 03:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
1901 +++$+++ CouldOughta +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1900 +++$+++ 1900 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.215082980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for getting back to me!  I'm at dp64@aol.com.  I don't suppose you have anything on the backstage area?  My heroine must perform, then have a backstage discussion, and then meet her boyfriend in one of the boxes.  I wish I'd taken notes when I was there!  +++$+++ :Thanks for getting back to me!  I'm at dp64@aol.com.  I don't suppose you have anything on the backstage area?  My heroine must perform, then have a backstage discussion, and then meet her boyfriend in one of the boxes.  I wish I'd taken notes when I was there! [[User:CouldOughta|CouldOughta]] ([[User talk:CouldOughta|talk]]) 04:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

264046 +++$+++ Ghirlandajo +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-18 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.174277820E09 +++$+++ \"[[WP:USER|On a user's own talk page, policy does not prohibit the removal of comments at that user's discretion]]\". [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGhirlandajo&diff=116068026&oldid=116058077 Care to explain]? Is not it enough that you guys scared me from editing here? What else do you need from me? --<font color=\"FC4339\"> +++$+++ "[[WP:USER|On a user's own talk page, policy does not prohibit the removal of comments at that user's discretion]]". [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGhirlandajo&diff=116068026&oldid=116058077 Care to explain]? Is not it enough that you guys scared me from editing here? What else do you need from me? --<font color="FC4339">[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</font></sup> 21:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
264047 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264046 +++$+++ 264046 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.174279140E09 +++$+++ Yup, I was replying to an issue. Delete the comment if you will once it is resolved. No-one is attempting to 'scare' you away -- just ask you to follow policy.  +++$+++ :Yup, I was replying to an issue. Delete the comment if you will once it is resolved. No-one is attempting to 'scare' you away -- just ask you to follow policy. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

264048 +++$+++ UnitedStatesian +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.174299720E09 +++$+++ 11. Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority.\"  Since the links are both personal web pages, shouldn't they both be deleted?  +++$+++ 11. Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority."  Since the links are both personal web pages, shouldn't they both be deleted? [[User:UnitedStatesian|UnitedStatesian]] 03:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
264049 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264048 +++$+++ 264048 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.174366080E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I put them back because they are the sources for some of the info. I guess the topic doesn't demand as great an authority as a serious academic topic. A dedicated fan, I guess, could be considered an authority.  +++$+++ :Yeah, I put them back because they are the sources for some of the info. I guess the topic doesn't demand as great an authority as a serious academic topic. A dedicated fan, I guess, could be considered an authority. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
264050 +++$+++ UnitedStatesian +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264048 +++$+++ 264049 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.174475760E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure I agree.  I think we can hold ALL WP articles to the same standard, and I am not comfortable using a dedicated fan as an authority for a WP article (and I think this standard is pretty consistently applied across WP).  +++$+++ ::I'm not sure I agree.  I think we can hold ALL WP articles to the same standard, and I am not comfortable using a dedicated fan as an authority for a WP article (and I think this standard is pretty consistently applied across WP). [[User:UnitedStatesian|UnitedStatesian]] 04:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
264051 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264048 +++$+++ 264050 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.174496940E09 +++$+++ I suggest you rewrite the article using the ref and cite tags so that the article only contains sourced information. The phrase recognised authority is problematic: recognised by whom? How is 'authority' calculated? This is uncontroversial for serious issues (position in an university, for instance).  +++$+++ :::I suggest you rewrite the article using the ref and cite tags so that the article only contains sourced information. The phrase recognised authority is problematic: recognised by whom? How is 'authority' calculated? This is uncontroversial for serious issues (position in an university, for instance). [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
264052 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264048 +++$+++ 264048 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.174594620E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure which edit of mine you are referring, but I would be more inclined to cite Levinson as primary, and George Yule for secondary.  +++$+++ :I'm not sure which edit of mine you are referring, but I would be more inclined to cite Levinson as primary, and George Yule for secondary. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

526195 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526195 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-24 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.156418760E09 +++$+++ Why did you take the time to remove the db-repost template from an article that was previously deleted for being non-notable, and on the talk page the creator admits it doesn't belong in article space, yet not delete the article?-- +++$+++ Why did you take the time to remove the db-repost template from an article that was previously deleted for being non-notable, and on the talk page the creator admits it doesn't belong in article space, yet not delete the article?--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 04:26, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
526196 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526195 +++$+++ 526195 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.156419480E09 +++$+++ Its still tagged as a speedy. I put db-bio on it as well and the repost just so that an admin would quickly know that it had been deleted before (I'm not sure how easy it is for you to tell that).-- +++$+++ :Its still tagged as a speedy. I put db-bio on it as well and the repost just so that an admin would quickly know that it had been deleted before (I'm not sure how easy it is for you to tell that).--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 04:38, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
526197 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526195 +++$+++ 526196 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.156419600E09 +++$+++ It was the same assertion as before, and if you check the last entry on the talk page the creator admints it doesn't belong there and that he's moved it to user space (which I think is also a criteria for deletion)-- +++$+++ ::It was the same assertion as before, and if you check the last entry on the talk page the creator admints it doesn't belong there and that he's moved it to user space (which I think is also a criteria for deletion)--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 04:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
526198 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526195 +++$+++ 526197 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.156419840E09 +++$+++ and I know repost isn't appropriate criteria, it was just included in addition to the db-bio template as a courtesy. I've never seen what an admin sees when they look at a page.-- +++$+++ :::and I know repost isn't appropriate criteria, it was just included in addition to the db-bio template as a courtesy. I've never seen what an admin sees when they look at a page.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 04:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

264053 +++$+++ Arwel_Parry +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-27 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.175037960E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for handling the JTV idiot's attacks on my talk page. His persistence in creating accounts to throw away in this way is amazing! --  +++$+++ Many thanks for handling the JTV idiot's attacks on my talk page. His persistence in creating accounts to throw away in this way is amazing! -- [[User:Arwel_Parry|Arwel]] ([[User talk:Arwel_Parry|talk]]) 16:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
264054 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264053 +++$+++ 264053 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.175038860E09 +++$+++ No problemo, anytime, especially you're the one who welcomed me to the project back in December 2004! It's quite fun, actually, to see who gets bored first. Looks like he did: either that or the doctor made him go back to his padded room. I get my fair share of obscenities (found one waiting for me when I logged in to commons last week)  +++$+++ :No problemo, anytime, especially you're the one who welcomed me to the project back in December 2004! It's quite fun, actually, to see who gets bored first. Looks like he did: either that or the doctor made him go back to his padded room. I get my fair share of obscenities (found one waiting for me when I logged in to commons last week) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
264055 +++$+++ TML +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264053 +++$+++ 264053 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.175039340E09 +++$+++ Furthermore, it appears that he sometimes creates seemingly good-standing accounts to \"disguise\" his actions a bit - I just discovered that {{vandal|Brent Harding}} is the source of the accounts {{vandal|Daron Odadjian}}, {{vandal|Rikk Agnew}}, and  {{vandal|John Guy Harding}}, and BH edits pretty much the same articles that JtV does. I therefore think that Brent Harding should be blocked as a JtV sock.  +++$+++ :Furthermore, it appears that he sometimes creates seemingly good-standing accounts to "disguise" his actions a bit - I just discovered that {{vandal|Brent Harding}} is the source of the accounts {{vandal|Daron Odadjian}}, {{vandal|Rikk Agnew}}, and  {{vandal|John Guy Harding}}, and BH edits pretty much the same articles that JtV does. I therefore think that Brent Harding should be blocked as a JtV sock. [[User:TML|TML]] 16:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

1910 +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1910 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-07 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.228702260E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Mrlopez2681|Mrlopez2681]] ([[User talk:Mrlopez2681|talk]]) 18:11, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
1911 +++$+++ Rmrfstar +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1910 +++$+++ 1910 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.228709400E09 +++$+++ Will do! How about you write it on the talk page and when we're done sourcing it we can include it? --  +++$+++ :Will do! How about you write it on the talk page and when we're done sourcing it we can include it? -- [[User:Rmrfstar|rmrfstar]] ([[User talk:Rmrfstar|talk]]) 20:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
1912 +++$+++ Rmrfstar +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1910 +++$+++ 1911 +++$+++ 2008-12-10 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.228970400E09 +++$+++ Great work so far! Still, I must insist that whatever you write includes inline citations in the style of the current article. --  +++$+++ ::Great work so far! Still, I must insist that whatever you write includes inline citations in the style of the current article. -- [[User:Rmrfstar|rmrfstar]] ([[User talk:Rmrfstar|talk]]) 20:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1913 +++$+++ Rmrfstar +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1910 +++$+++ 1912 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.229263620E09 +++$+++ Excellent citations! Thanks: they really mean a lot to me. --  +++$+++ :::Excellent citations! Thanks: they really mean a lot to me. -- [[User:Rmrfstar|rmrfstar]] ([[User talk:Rmrfstar|talk]]) 06:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

526199 +++$+++ Deenoe +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-26 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.156656360E09 +++$+++ I am unfortunatly effected by this block, while I have nothing to do with this. Oh can you remove this block to let me edit at will your worship :) --<b><font color=\"#006633&quot;> +++$+++ I am unfortunatly effected by this block, while I have nothing to do with this. Oh can you remove this block to let me edit at will your worship :) --<b><font color="#006633&quot;>[[User:Deenoe|Deenoe]]</font></b> 22:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
526200 +++$+++ Deenoe +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526199 +++$+++ 526199 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.156656420E09 +++$+++ Block is already off, neveeeeermind :) --<b><font color=\"#006633\"> +++$+++ :Block is already off, neveeeeermind :) --<b><font color="#006633">[[User:Deenoe|Deenoe]]</font></b> 22:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

264057 +++$+++ Bob Castle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-01 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.175460300E09 +++$+++ Hello JPS, it appears last night [[User:Feedyourkoalanow]] put a redirect to [[Durham, North Carolina]] into the [[Durham]] space and displaced Durham (UK) to [[Durham, UK]]. It appears to be against the previous consensus that Durham (UK) should be at [[Durham]], and looking at the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Whatlinkshere\/Durham%2C_UK what links here], it seems to have created a large problem with redirects. I believe only administrators can move pages back over redirects, though, so I was wondering whether you would be able to help. Thanks in advance. ''' +++$+++ Hello JPS, it appears last night [[User:Feedyourkoalanow]] put a redirect to [[Durham, North Carolina]] into the [[Durham]] space and displaced Durham (UK) to [[Durham, UK]]. It appears to be against the previous consensus that Durham (UK) should be at [[Durham]], and looking at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/Durham%2C_UK what links here], it seems to have created a large problem with redirects. I believe only administrators can move pages back over redirects, though, so I was wondering whether you would be able to help. Thanks in advance. '''[[User:Bob Castle|Bob]]''' <small>'''[[User talk:Bob Castle|talk]]'''</small> 13:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
264058 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264057 +++$+++ 264057 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.175464140E09 +++$+++ Ah, appears to have been sorted by the time I got to it.  +++$+++ :Ah, appears to have been sorted by the time I got to it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

264059 +++$+++ Hoverfish +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-02 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.175559660E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm not sure if it's kind to load such things on you, but as of today we have a new user just blanking user pages: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/TheInvisibleMachine5]. I noticed as he just blanked [[User talk:Prolog|Prolog]]'s talk page. Does this get a block right off, or do we start with warnings?  +++$+++ Hi, I'm not sure if it's kind to load such things on you, but as of today we have a new user just blanking user pages: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/TheInvisibleMachine5]. I noticed as he just blanked [[User talk:Prolog|Prolog]]'s talk page. Does this get a block right off, or do we start with warnings? [[User:Hoverfish|Hoverfish]] <small>[[User talk:Hoverfish|Talk]]</small> 17:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
264060 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264059 +++$+++ 264059 +++$+++ 2007-04-02 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.175559900E09 +++$+++ Ah, he's been blocked by someone else. With the abusive language and lack of previous useful contributions I would have went for a block straight away.  +++$+++ :Ah, he's been blocked by someone else. With the abusive language and lack of previous useful contributions I would have went for a block straight away. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

1918 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-24 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.235508300E09 +++$+++ I notice that many of the images you have uploaded have been copyright violations or otherwise inappropriate. I notice that you have not uploaded any further images since August last year, and please make sure you are familiar with the [[WP:IP|image policy]] before uploading any further images.  +++$+++ I notice that many of the images you have uploaded have been copyright violations or otherwise inappropriate. I notice that you have not uploaded any further images since August last year, and please make sure you are familiar with the [[WP:IP|image policy]] before uploading any further images. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 12:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
1919 +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1918 +++$+++ 1918 +++$+++ 2009-02-25 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.235617860E09 +++$+++ what images have copyright issues? most of them are from my own collection. -- +++$+++ :what images have copyright issues? most of them are from my own collection. --[[User:Mrlopez2681|Mrlopez2681]] ([[User talk:Mrlopez2681|talk]]) 19:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
1920 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1918 +++$+++ 1919 +++$+++ 2009-02-25 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.235619120E09 +++$+++ You can see a list of images with copyright issues on the prior messages on your talk page.  +++$+++ ::You can see a list of images with copyright issues on the prior messages on your talk page. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 19:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

264065 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264065 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.176267420E09 +++$+++ Hi there, why not drop LuciferMorgan a note on his talk page? He seems just to have been having a bad day and you two got off on the wrong foot. I can certainly see his point of view, but you were only trying to help and he was pretty rude\/blunt (delete one depending on your POV)!  +++$+++ Hi there, why not drop LuciferMorgan a note on his talk page? He seems just to have been having a bad day and you two got off on the wrong foot. I can certainly see his point of view, but you were only trying to help and he was pretty rude/blunt (delete one depending on your POV)! [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 21:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
264066 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264065 +++$+++ 264065 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.176268680E09 +++$+++ hey! I was thinking of doing just that, but took a break from the keyboard. There's little point in doing it tonight as his latest response to my comments are still hostile. Thanks for your soothing influence.  +++$+++ :hey! I was thinking of doing just that, but took a break from the keyboard. There's little point in doing it tonight as his latest response to my comments are still hostile. Thanks for your soothing influence. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

1922 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-26 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.243325100E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Cesare Pugni -circa 1860.JPG]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Cesare Pugni -circa 1860.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Cesare Pugni -circa 1860.jpg]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:File:Cesare Pugni -circa 1860.JPG]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Cesare Pugni -circa 1860.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Cesare Pugni -circa 1860.jpg]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 01:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
1923 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.243325160E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Cesare Pugni -circa 1845.JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Cesare Pugni -circa 1845.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Cesare Pugni -circa 1845.JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Cesare Pugni -circa 1845.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 01:06, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
1924 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ 2009-10-08 08:09:00 +++$+++ 1.255014540E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Empress Catherine The Great circa 1770 (D.G. Levitsky).JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Empress Catherine The Great circa 1770 (D.G. Levitsky).JPG]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Empress Catherine The Great circa 1770 (D.G. Levitsky).JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Empress Catherine The Great circa 1770 (D.G. Levitsky).JPG]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 08:09, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
1925 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.261065360E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Coppelia -Swanilda -Giuseppina Bozzachi -Act I-Scene 2 -Paris -1870 -2.JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Coppelia -Swanilda -Giuseppina Bozzachi -Act I-Scene 2 -Paris -1870 -2.JPG]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Coppelia -Swanilda -Giuseppina Bozzachi -Act I-Scene 2 -Paris -1870 -2.JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Coppelia -Swanilda -Giuseppina Bozzachi -Act I-Scene 2 -Paris -1870 -2.JPG]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 07:56, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
1926 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.261073280E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Coppelia -Adeline Genee -1897.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Copp\xe9lia -Adeline Gen\xe9e.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Coppelia -Adeline Genee -1897.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Coppélia -Adeline Genée.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 10:08, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
1927 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.261088940E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Sleeping Beauty -Anna Johannson as Canari with pages -1890.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Sleeping Beauty -Anna Johannson.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Sleeping Beauty -Anna Johannson as Canari with pages -1890.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Sleeping Beauty -Anna Johannson.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 14:29, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
1928 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ 1922 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.261089960E09 +++$+++ [[:File:King's Command -Pepito -Pavel Gerdt -1886.JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:King's Command -Pavel Gerdt.JPG]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:King's Command -Pepito -Pavel Gerdt -1886.JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:King's Command -Pavel Gerdt.JPG]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 14:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

264067 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.176269040E09 +++$+++ Good plan. He's a nice guy, he just seemed to be narked about waiting so long for a review and you got caught in the crossfire.  +++$+++ Good plan. He's a nice guy, he just seemed to be narked about waiting so long for a review and you got caught in the crossfire. [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 22:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
264068 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264067 +++$+++ 264067 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.176328500E09 +++$+++ It would have been much much better to spend time researching and writing the articles on a one by one basis rather than creating a dozen substubs.  +++$+++ :It would have been much much better to spend time researching and writing the articles on a one by one basis rather than creating a dozen substubs. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

611990 +++$+++ Tetra Vega +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611990 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-27 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.185593400E09 +++$+++ He's vandalising the Tenkaichi 3 page right now. I just reverted a bunch of his bull****. +++$+++ He's vandalising the Tenkaichi 3 page right now. I just reverted a bunch of his bull****.[[User:Tetra Vega|Tetra Vega]] 20:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
611991 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611990 +++$+++ 611990 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.186039440E09 +++$+++ He's been reported. ^^ \/\/  +++$+++ :He's been reported. ^^ // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 00:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

526214 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526214 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.157089380E09 +++$+++ For the past two weeks [[User:66.11.160.31]] has been reverting the intro to the [[Jesse Macbeth]] article to make it read as if this guy was legitimate.  If you are unfamiliar, Macbeth was kicked out of the Army while in recruit training and then became the darling of the anti-war crowd when he came out saying he was a Ranger and participated in war atrocities.  He has since been proven to be a liar by just about everyone except the user above.  Anyway, I am asking if you could intervene with this user to stop them from making these revisions as they are known to be false and this constant back and forth is getting old.  Thanks in advance for the help.  Hope everything else is going good.  -- +++$+++ For the past two weeks [[User:66.11.160.31]] has been reverting the intro to the [[Jesse Macbeth]] article to make it read as if this guy was legitimate.  If you are unfamiliar, Macbeth was kicked out of the Army while in recruit training and then became the darling of the anti-war crowd when he came out saying he was a Ranger and participated in war atrocities.  He has since been proven to be a liar by just about everyone except the user above.  Anyway, I am asking if you could intervene with this user to stop them from making these revisions as they are known to be false and this constant back and forth is getting old.  Thanks in advance for the help.  Hope everything else is going good.  --[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 22:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
526215 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526214 +++$+++ 526214 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.157090460E09 +++$+++ In addition to the last it seems that the above user has either taken a new name or gained a friend.  Please add [[User:Jessefriend]] to the above situation as well. Thanks-- +++$+++ : In addition to the last it seems that the above user has either taken a new name or gained a friend.  Please add [[User:Jessefriend]] to the above situation as well. Thanks--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 23:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

264071 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264071 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-12 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.176368340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 01:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
264072 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264071 +++$+++ 264071 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.176423060E09 +++$+++ PS: \"de rigeur\" doesn't mean what I thought it meant. :-) I was trying to say, \"This is something that we all encounter from time to time; it may be unpleasant, but not unusual.\" Sorry for the poor vocab! ;-)  +++$+++ * PS: "de rigeur" doesn't mean what I thought it meant. :-) I was trying to say, "This is something that we all encounter from time to time; it may be unpleasant, but not unusual." Sorry for the poor vocab! ;-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 17:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

526216 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526216 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-01 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.157098620E09 +++$+++ &mdash;  +++$+++ &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 01:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
526217 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526216 +++$+++ 526216 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.157100480E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the help.  I am editing on the sly at work so I have been in and out of the office and unable to reply to the message you put on my page.  Again thanks.-- +++$+++ * Thank you for the help.  I am editing on the sly at work so I have been in and out of the office and unable to reply to the message you put on my page.  Again thanks.--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 01:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

264073 +++$+++ Arwel_Parry +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264073 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-17 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.176852720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for protecting my talk page from Johnny the Boring Vandal. I wonder how many throwaway accounts he's got?! :) --  +++$+++ Thanks for protecting my talk page from Johnny the Boring Vandal. I wonder how many throwaway accounts he's got?! :) -- [[User:Arwel_Parry|Arwel]] ([[User talk:Arwel_Parry|talk]]) 16:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
264074 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264073 +++$+++ 264073 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.176855060E09 +++$+++ I reckon it's part of some research project. I reckon some of the vandalism and trolling is part of some new media studies research about communities and reaction. Or he's just silly. He even did something to my talk page during this afternoon's shift, which was handy 'cause it made the latest account much easier to spot.  +++$+++ :I reckon it's part of some research project. I reckon some of the vandalism and trolling is part of some new media studies research about communities and reaction. Or he's just silly. He even did something to my talk page during this afternoon's shift, which was handy 'cause it made the latest account much easier to spot. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
264075 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264073 +++$+++ 264073 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.176854760E09 +++$+++ As I say on your talk page, Wikipedia is not for original research. I'm not sure how and where to publish your research but for now Wikipedia is not it. Best.  +++$+++ :As I say on your talk page, Wikipedia is not for original research. I'm not sure how and where to publish your research but for now Wikipedia is not it. Best. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
264076 +++$+++ TML +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264073 +++$+++ 264073 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.176901980E09 +++$+++ Even I have now become a target of him - can you please watchlist my talk page and revert any future edits he might make there?  +++$+++ :Even I have now become a target of him - can you please watchlist my talk page and revert any future edits he might make there? [[User:TML|TML]] 06:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
264077 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264073 +++$+++ 264073 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.177086600E09 +++$+++ I note that a separate admin had earlier also decided to delete the article.  +++$+++ :I note that a separate admin had earlier also decided to delete the article. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

526218 +++$+++ Nobunaga24 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-01 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.157095500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up. Deepthroat123 has violated 3RR, btw. -- +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up. Deepthroat123 has violated 3RR, btw. --[[User:Nobunaga24|Nobunaga24]] 00:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
526219 +++$+++ Nobunaga24 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526218 +++$+++ 526218 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.157095800E09 +++$+++ Those accounts haven't been created yet (I think). Just being lighthearted :-)-- +++$+++ :Those accounts haven't been created yet (I think). Just being lighthearted :-)--[[User:Nobunaga24|Nobunaga24]] 00:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
526220 +++$+++ Nobunaga24 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526218 +++$+++ 526219 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.157096340E09 +++$+++ I believe someone else, Mmx1, has reported the sockpuppety, Don't know if anyone has reported the vandalism. I'm kind of doing my editing on the sly right now, since I'm at work, so haven't really gotten too deep into the whole affair, just a few reverts. I think Mmx1 and Looper have been battling this guy more than me, and doing a good job of it.-- +++$+++ ::I believe someone else, Mmx1, has reported the sockpuppety, Don't know if anyone has reported the vandalism. I'm kind of doing my editing on the sly right now, since I'm at work, so haven't really gotten too deep into the whole affair, just a few reverts. I think Mmx1 and Looper have been battling this guy more than me, and doing a good job of it.--[[User:Nobunaga24|Nobunaga24]] 00:39, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

44013 +++$+++ Myles325a +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-01 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.298986200E09 +++$+++ You have not answered my query above, and with the new link, which is not commercial, you have deleted it as well. Once again, you have not even bothered to say what is wrong with it. It is ONLY a list of sites which also feature kenken puzzles and it includes variants and educational material on these mathematical games.  I ASKED you to clarify the problem, and you just keep deleting a useful and harmless link to a site that many readers would find valuable. What IS the matter with you? Why don't you tell me what rule I am supposed to have broken?  +++$+++ You have not answered my query above, and with the new link, which is not commercial, you have deleted it as well. Once again, you have not even bothered to say what is wrong with it. It is ONLY a list of sites which also feature kenken puzzles and it includes variants and educational material on these mathematical games.  I ASKED you to clarify the problem, and you just keep deleting a useful and harmless link to a site that many readers would find valuable. What IS the matter with you? Why don't you tell me what rule I am supposed to have broken? [[User:Myles325a|Myles325a]] ([[User talk:Myles325a|talk]]) 05:30, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
44014 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44013 +++$+++ 44013 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.299120720E09 +++$+++ Between the behavior above and the fact that another person has agreed the link should be removed, the rules you have broken are [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:CONSENSUS]], beyond just the putting up a link that violates [[WP:EL]] rules for being encyclopedic in tone. I also suspect you may have a [[WP:COI]] about this site.  +++$+++ :Between the behavior above and the fact that another person has agreed the link should be removed, the rules you have broken are [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:CONSENSUS]], beyond just the putting up a link that violates [[WP:EL]] rules for being encyclopedic in tone. I also suspect you may have a [[WP:COI]] about this site. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] ([[User talk:DreamGuy#top|talk]]) 18:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

264082 +++$+++ Mholland +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-02 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.178154780E09 +++$+++ One of these images needs to have a fair use rationale added and the other needs to be deleted.  I have, experimentally, added a rationale to [[:Image:University of sunderland logo.gif]], but it applies equally to  the other.  What do you think? \u2014  +++$+++ One of these images needs to have a fair use rationale added and the other needs to be deleted.  I have, experimentally, added a rationale to [[:Image:University of sunderland logo.gif]], but it applies equally to  the other.  What do you think? — [[User:Mholland|mholland]] [[User_talk:Mholland|(talk)]] 18:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
264083 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264082 +++$+++ 264082 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.178161740E09 +++$+++ You're probably right, esp. the transparency and filename. Thanks for adding the fair use rationale. I've deleted the other image.  +++$+++ :You're probably right, esp. the transparency and filename. Thanks for adding the fair use rationale. I've deleted the other image. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

524611 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-10 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.194735840E09 +++$+++ ...for handling the [[Felicia Fox]] request - you beat me to it.  +++$+++ ...for handling the [[Felicia Fox]] request - you beat me to it. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 15:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
524612 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524611 +++$+++ 524611 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.194736320E09 +++$+++ I also replied by email. -- +++$+++ : I also replied by email. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
524613 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524611 +++$+++ 524612 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.194739200E09 +++$+++ Thanks again - off-topic here, but would you mind adding [[Nonie Darwish]] to your (probably already extremely extensive) watchlist? According to the article subject, the bio is a magnet for POV-pushing; the history seems to bear this out. I've got it watchlisted myself but probably won't have a lot of time for editing over the next few weeks.  +++$+++ :: Thanks again - off-topic here, but would you mind adding [[Nonie Darwish]] to your (probably already extremely extensive) watchlist? According to the article subject, the bio is a magnet for POV-pushing; the history seems to bear this out. I've got it watchlisted myself but probably won't have a lot of time for editing over the next few weeks. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 16:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
524614 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524611 +++$+++ 524613 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.194739440E09 +++$+++ Added, will try to watch. -- +++$+++ ::: Added, will try to watch. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
524615 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524611 +++$+++ 524614 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.194739560E09 +++$+++ Cool. Hope you don't mind, but I also passed her your e-mail address in case of something particularly egregious that ends up in there, along with the e-mail address for the OTRS folks in case you and me are unavailable.  +++$+++ :::: Cool. Hope you don't mind, but I also passed her your e-mail address in case of something particularly egregious that ends up in there, along with the e-mail address for the OTRS folks in case you and me are unavailable. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 16:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

264084 +++$+++ Vanderdecken +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-05 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.178390460E09 +++$+++ As you can see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Blackadder:_Back_%26_Forth&diff=prev&oldid=128269571 here], your AWB template replacement also mistakenly capitalised\/shortened many words in the rest of the article. Please be more careful in future. \u2014 +++$+++ As you can see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blackadder:_Back_%26_Forth&diff=prev&oldid=128269571 here], your AWB template replacement also mistakenly capitalised/shortened many words in the rest of the article. Please be more careful in future. —[[User:Vanderdecken|Vanderdecken]]∴ <b>[[User talk:Vanderdecken|∫]][[Special:Emailuser/Vanderdecken|ξ]][[Special:Contributions/Vanderdecken|φ]]</b> 11:41, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
264085 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264084 +++$+++ 264084 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.178414100E09 +++$+++ Ah, sorry about that. Considering the amount of time I spent last night a couple of minor mistakes were acceptable. At least we don't have that silly fork anymore.  +++$+++ :Ah, sorry about that. Considering the amount of time I spent last night a couple of minor mistakes were acceptable. At least we don't have that silly fork anymore. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
264086 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264084 +++$+++ 264085 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.178414520E09 +++$+++ Oh, and reviewing those articles: the typos I introduced are the least of their worries. The trivia sections, and the spellings within, are atrocious.  +++$+++ ::Oh, and reviewing those articles: the typos I introduced are the least of their worries. The trivia sections, and the spellings within, are atrocious. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:22, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
264087 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264084 +++$+++ 264084 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 07:22:00 +++$+++ 1.178634120E09 +++$+++ Hello. Images would have to be released under a specific license for us to use them. See [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission]]. The copyright holder needs to email the Wikipedia Foundation releasing the rights. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hello. Images would have to be released under a specific license for us to use them. See [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission]]. The copyright holder needs to email the Wikipedia Foundation releasing the rights. Cheers, [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 07:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
264088 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264084 +++$+++ 264084 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.178633700E09 +++$+++ I know it seems unfair. I once ran a TV Themes website. Other sites sprang up, using identical files as mine and everyone else. Their sites looked better than my poorly designed site. Disheartening, considering the hours I'd spent encoding the content. However, that's the internet. When I was pissed off all hose years ago, a wise friend told my if I was that bothered, don't put it on in the web in first place.  +++$+++ :I know it seems unfair. I once ran a TV Themes website. Other sites sprang up, using identical files as mine and everyone else. Their sites looked better than my poorly designed site. Disheartening, considering the hours I'd spent encoding the content. However, that's the internet. When I was pissed off all hose years ago, a wise friend told my if I was that bothered, don't put it on in the web in first place. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 07:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
264089 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264084 +++$+++ 264084 +++$+++ 2007-05-10 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.178833740E09 +++$+++ The image was tagged as a non-free promotional image without a source. Sources '''must''' be given. This is made abundantly clear on th upload page.  +++$+++ :The image was tagged as a non-free promotional image without a source. Sources '''must''' be given. This is made abundantly clear on th upload page. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

526232 +++$+++ Khukri +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-03 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.157323380E09 +++$+++ you beat me to the TPV4, cheers muchly  +++$+++ you beat me to the TPV4, cheers muchly [[User:Khukri|'''Khukri''']]  <sup>([[User_talk:Khukri|'''<font face="verdana">talk</font>''']] . [[Special:Contributions/Khukri|'''<font face="verdana">contribs</font>''']])</sup> 15:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
526233 +++$+++ Khukri +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526232 +++$+++ 526232 +++$+++ 2006-09-03 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.157324220E09 +++$+++ yea noticed that just had one blocked who was leaving ''| MUAHH HA HA HA HA HAA'' on articles, I wondered if this one was the same guy who'd just changed his IP. We'll see. Cheers  +++$+++ :yea noticed that just had one blocked who was leaving ''| MUAHH HA HA HA HA HAA'' on articles, I wondered if this one was the same guy who'd just changed his IP. We'll see. Cheers [[User:Khukri|'''Khukri''']]  <sup>([[User_talk:Khukri|'''<font face="verdana">talk</font>''']] . [[Special:Contributions/Khukri|'''<font face="verdana">contribs</font>''']])</sup> 15:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

393540 +++$+++ Finereach +++$+++ PaulWicks +++$+++ 393540 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-22 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.253679420E09 +++$+++ A comment has been made highlighting a discrepancy between the image at [[Ventromedial prefrontal cortex]] and the one at [[Orbitofrontal cortex]].  Since the image at [[:File:OFC.JPG]] is yours (literally!) I thought I would ask for your help in the discussion at [[Talk:Ventromedial prefrontal cortex]] - I'd really welcome your input. Thanks  +++$+++ A comment has been made highlighting a discrepancy between the image at [[Ventromedial prefrontal cortex]] and the one at [[Orbitofrontal cortex]].  Since the image at [[:File:OFC.JPG]] is yours (literally!) I thought I would ask for your help in the discussion at [[Talk:Ventromedial prefrontal cortex]] - I'd really welcome your input. Thanks [[User:Finereach|Finereach]] ([[User talk:Finereach|talk]]) 21:17, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
393541 +++$+++ Finereach +++$+++ PaulWicks +++$+++ 393540 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-23 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.253762040E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for the rapid reply - response on vmpfc talk page. +++$+++ :: Thanks a lot for the rapid reply - response on vmpfc talk page.[[User:Finereach|Finereach]] ([[User talk:Finereach|talk]]) 20:14, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

264090 +++$+++ Chacor +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-11 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.178918580E09 +++$+++ You might want to use this log to block more Johnny vandal socks. &ndash;  +++$+++ You might want to use this log to block more Johnny vandal socks. &ndash; [[User talk:Chacor|Chacor]] 14:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
264091 +++$+++ Chacor +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264090 +++$+++ 264090 +++$+++ 2007-05-11 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.178918760E09 +++$+++ And remember to check the next 100 or so in case you missed older ones! :) &ndash;  +++$+++ :And remember to check the next 100 or so in case you missed older ones! :) &ndash; [[User talk:Chacor|Chacor]] 14:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

44015 +++$+++ Myles325a +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-03 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.299148260E09 +++$+++ I am re-inserting the link, and putting the contents of my comments here on the talk page of the Kenken article, the talk page of your compatriot Bongomatic, as well as taking it up with the Administrators.   +++$+++ I am re-inserting the link, and putting the contents of my comments here on the talk page of the Kenken article, the talk page of your compatriot Bongomatic, as well as taking it up with the Administrators.  [[User:Myles325a|Myles325a]] ([[User talk:Myles325a|talk]]) 02:31, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
44016 +++$+++ Berean Hunter +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44015 +++$+++ 44015 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.299154140E09 +++$+++ This user opened a [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#My Kenken link repeatedly deleted|thread at ANI]] where you are mentioned.<br\/><span style=\"text-shadow:#294 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ :This user opened a [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#My Kenken link repeatedly deleted|thread at ANI]] where you are mentioned.<br/><span style="text-shadow:#294 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; class=texhtml">[[User:Berean Hunter|<font face="High Tower Text" size="2px"><b style="color:#00C">⋙–Ber</b><b style="color:#66f">ean–Hun</b><b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b></font>]] ([[User talk:Berean Hunter|<b style="color:#00C">(⊕)</b>]])</span> 04:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
44017 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44015 +++$+++ 44016 +++$+++ 2011-03-05 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.299327720E09 +++$+++ These days any ANI thread complaining about me is archived before I even see it. Probably for the best. Thanks for the heads up, though.  +++$+++ ::These days any ANI thread complaining about me is archived before I even see it. Probably for the best. Thanks for the heads up, though. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] ([[User talk:DreamGuy#top|talk]]) 04:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

530735 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-04 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.259973420E09 +++$+++ I started an article [[William B. Slaughter]] and it might be DYK material. William Slaughter became a lawyer in Kentucky and was elected to the Indiana House of Representations where he introduced resolutions supporting President Jackson in the Nullification Crisis involving South Carolina. Eventually Slaughter ends up in Wisconsin Territory and helps organized the territory and becomes Wisconsin terrritorial secretary. Here is the interesting part a county now [[Washington County, Iowa]] is named after him but the citizens did not like the name so the citizens of the county  named it after President Washington instead. RoyalBroil-if you feel this is DYK then fine although I will not nominate this myself. If it is nominated another editor who is involved should also get the credit. Many thanks- +++$+++ I started an article [[William B. Slaughter]] and it might be DYK material. William Slaughter became a lawyer in Kentucky and was elected to the Indiana House of Representations where he introduced resolutions supporting President Jackson in the Nullification Crisis involving South Carolina. Eventually Slaughter ends up in Wisconsin Territory and helps organized the territory and becomes Wisconsin terrritorial secretary. Here is the interesting part a county now [[Washington County, Iowa]] is named after him but the citizens did not like the name so the citizens of the county  named it after President Washington instead. RoyalBroil-if you feel this is DYK then fine although I will not nominate this myself. If it is nominated another editor who is involved should also get the credit. Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 16:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
530736 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.260046980E09 +++$+++ It ''barely'' passes the DYK length criteria, it should really get expanded first. I checked it with the unofficial checker that many people use. I'm at 99 DYK including 89 ones I did and 10 nominations. I decided that #100 is going to be a big one, so I've been working for months in my sandbox on expanding a neglected article to [[WP:GA]] standards for #100. So I'm not taking requests and I'm going to pass on it. I think you should nominate it! It's easy and it's looks good on your resume! I'm happy to walk you through it and to approve the hook. The fact is interesting - wanting to rename Slaughter County! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :It ''barely'' passes the DYK length criteria, it should really get expanded first. I checked it with the unofficial checker that many people use. I'm at 99 DYK including 89 ones I did and 10 nominations. I decided that #100 is going to be a big one, so I've been working for months in my sandbox on expanding a neglected article to [[WP:GA]] standards for #100. So I'm not taking requests and I'm going to pass on it. I think you should nominate it! It's easy and it's looks good on your resume! I'm happy to walk you through it and to approve the hook. The fact is interesting - wanting to rename Slaughter County! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:03, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
530737 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ 530736 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.260048780E09 +++$+++ It was a passing thought. I did get a DYK about [[Tommy Burnett]] Tennessee House of Representatives. Orlady was and is very kind and gracious and it was graetly appreciated. I told Orlady that the members of the various state legislature are far more interesting then their counterparts in the US Congress. One example [[Davis Hanson Waite]]-he was from New York state and added up in 2 different state legislatures Wisconsin\/Kansas before he added up as Governor in a 3rd state Colorado. Also I started an article about [[Alexander P. Field]] Wisconsin Territory Secretary-in my research he apparently had a drinking problem and was married 3 times-he started out in the Illinois General Assembly was that state's Secretary of State, went to Wisconsin Territory then to Louisiana where he became Attorney General. So lots of this is interesting and makes Wikipedia unique and special about information that may not show up in almanacs or other encyclopedias. My apologies for being on my soapbox-hope you are well-thanks- +++$+++ ::It was a passing thought. I did get a DYK about [[Tommy Burnett]] Tennessee House of Representatives. Orlady was and is very kind and gracious and it was graetly appreciated. I told Orlady that the members of the various state legislature are far more interesting then their counterparts in the US Congress. One example [[Davis Hanson Waite]]-he was from New York state and added up in 2 different state legislatures Wisconsin/Kansas before he added up as Governor in a 3rd state Colorado. Also I started an article about [[Alexander P. Field]] Wisconsin Territory Secretary-in my research he apparently had a drinking problem and was married 3 times-he started out in the Illinois General Assembly was that state's Secretary of State, went to Wisconsin Territory then to Louisiana where he became Attorney General. So lots of this is interesting and makes Wikipedia unique and special about information that may not show up in almanacs or other encyclopedias. My apologies for being on my soapbox-hope you are well-thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
530738 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ 530737 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.260049140E09 +++$+++ Go for it - nominate it! I don't understand why you'd pass on nominating Slaughter. For Sec. Field, you would need to be careful about not trashing him by writing a hook talking about his drinking problem causing 3 marriages. I am doing well and I hope that you are doing well with the holiday approaching. I hope you read my post up one section about finally getting a new internet provider. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Go for it - nominate it! I don't understand why you'd pass on nominating Slaughter. For Sec. Field, you would need to be careful about not trashing him by writing a hook talking about his drinking problem causing 3 marriages. I am doing well and I hope that you are doing well with the holiday approaching. I hope you read my post up one section about finally getting a new internet provider. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
530739 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ 530736 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.260056040E09 +++$+++ On Alexander Pope Field don't worry-I will not put anything down about that but a historian Frank E. Stevens did mentioned his 3 marriages, the drinking in an article he wrote about Field-the Illinois Historical Society-I read the article through-in writing about Alexander Pope Field Many thanks- +++$+++ ::On Alexander Pope Field don't worry-I will not put anything down about that but a historian Frank E. Stevens did mentioned his 3 marriages, the drinking in an article he wrote about Field-the Illinois Historical Society-I read the article through-in writing about Alexander Pope Field Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 15:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
530740 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.260059580E09 +++$+++ The William B. Slaughter article is in the works-DYK!Thanks- +++$+++ :The William B. Slaughter article is in the works-DYK!Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 16:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
530741 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ 530740 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.260060780E09 +++$+++ Sorry you had to ask there, I would have explained! I juiced it up with 2 alternative suggestions that will give you a bunch more hits when it hits the main page (if used). '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Sorry you had to ask there, I would have explained! I juiced it up with 2 alternative suggestions that will give you a bunch more hits when it hits the main page (if used). '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 16:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
530742 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.260061800E09 +++$+++ No problem-this is the first time I did a DYK so it is interesting-everyone has been helpful. Another artcle I started was [[Charles Dunn]], CJ of the Wisconsin Territorial Supreme Court. His daughter Catherine married the first Wisconsin Governor [[Nelson Dewey]]. Unfortunately, the Nelson had martial problems and Nelson Dewey filed for a divorce that never went through. Chief Justice Dunn was supposed to be an excellent jurist and lawyer. Many thanks- +++$+++ :No problem-this is the first time I did a DYK so it is interesting-everyone has been helpful. Another artcle I started was [[Charles Dunn]], CJ of the Wisconsin Territorial Supreme Court. His daughter Catherine married the first Wisconsin Governor [[Nelson Dewey]]. Unfortunately, the Nelson had martial problems and Nelson Dewey filed for a divorce that never went through. Chief Justice Dunn was supposed to be an excellent jurist and lawyer. Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 17:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
530743 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ 530735 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.260310500E09 +++$+++ Many thanks-for your comments-the William Slaughter article took some work getting the info together. On the Alexander P. Field article I am taking your advise. As I told Orlady, Field was married 3 different times, was a heavy drinker. When he was Secretary of State of Illinois, hhe spent lots of time away most of it in St. Louis. The historian who wrote the article for the Illinios Historical Society Ralph Stevens even did not have a favorable attitute about Field. Even the Field Family Tree I look at was not that impress with him. Stevens even had problems getting photos of Field. He managed to get one of he with one of his wives.Many thanks again- +++$+++ :Many thanks-for your comments-the William Slaughter article took some work getting the info together. On the Alexander P. Field article I am taking your advise. As I told Orlady, Field was married 3 different times, was a heavy drinker. When he was Secretary of State of Illinois, hhe spent lots of time away most of it in St. Louis. The historian who wrote the article for the Illinios Historical Society Ralph Stevens even did not have a favorable attitute about Field. Even the Field Family Tree I look at was not that impress with him. Stevens even had problems getting photos of Field. He managed to get one of he with one of his wives.Many thanks again-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

526237 +++$+++ Glen S +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-05 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.157480040E09 +++$+++ Has been a bit of a handful by myself! -  +++$+++ Has been a bit of a handful by myself! - [[User talk:Glen S|'''Gl<font color="green">e</font>n''']] 11:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
526238 +++$+++ Glen S +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526237 +++$+++ 526237 +++$+++ 2006-09-07 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.157615700E09 +++$+++ ) -  +++$+++ :) - [[User talk:Glen S|'''Gl<font color="green">e</font>n''']] 00:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

264094 +++$+++ DickClarkMises +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264094 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-14 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.179181320E09 +++$+++ Could you describe the process for your deletion of [[Vern McKinley]]? A newbie acquaintance of mine just pinged me asking why the article was deleted, and I see that you speedied as nn. From a cursory search I found significant sources that clearly establish notability: [http:\/\/www.cato.org\/dailys\/10-30-98.html], [http:\/\/commdocs.house.gov\/committees\/judiciary\/hju52831.000\/hju52831_0.HTM#343], [www.freerepublic.com\/focus\/f-news\/1504347\/posts], [http:\/\/judiciary.house.gov\/legacy\/5181.htm], and [http:\/\/www.reason.com\/news\/show\/33670.html], to name a few. He also indicated that he tried to contest the speedy deletion, but I can't find a record of that so I am assuming he did so on the article talk page. In any event, I told him that he should just recreate the article and make sure to cite a bunch of independent sources (like those listed above) to make notability clear from the outset this time.  +++$+++ Could you describe the process for your deletion of [[Vern McKinley]]? A newbie acquaintance of mine just pinged me asking why the article was deleted, and I see that you speedied as nn. From a cursory search I found significant sources that clearly establish notability: [http://www.cato.org/dailys/10-30-98.html], [http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/judiciary/hju52831.000/hju52831_0.HTM#343], [www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1504347/posts], [http://judiciary.house.gov/legacy/5181.htm], and [http://www.reason.com/news/show/33670.html], to name a few. He also indicated that he tried to contest the speedy deletion, but I can't find a record of that so I am assuming he did so on the article talk page. In any event, I told him that he should just recreate the article and make sure to cite a bunch of independent sources (like those listed above) to make notability clear from the outset this time. [[User:DickClarkMises|DickClarkMises]] 15:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
264095 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264094 +++$+++ 264094 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.179181560E09 +++$+++ The reason it was nominated, and subsequently deleted, is that usually only politicians in (or have been in) office are considered notable.  +++$+++ :The reason it was nominated, and subsequently deleted, is that usually only politicians in (or have been in) office are considered notable. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
264096 +++$+++ DickClarkMises +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264094 +++$+++ 264095 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.179182100E09 +++$+++ What like [[Ross Perot]]? :) In all seriousness, McKinley is the subject of multiple independent, reliable sources. He has written articles published in notable media and has testified before Congress as an expert on housing, central banking, and government-sponsored enterprises in general. It seems to me that the deletion was taken lightly and that a new contributor's work may have been summarily deleted out of process (at least if it is true that the speedy was indeed contested).  +++$+++ ::What like [[Ross Perot]]? :) In all seriousness, McKinley is the subject of multiple independent, reliable sources. He has written articles published in notable media and has testified before Congress as an expert on housing, central banking, and government-sponsored enterprises in general. It seems to me that the deletion was taken lightly and that a new contributor's work may have been summarily deleted out of process (at least if it is true that the speedy was indeed contested). [[User:DickClarkMises|DickClarkMises]] 15:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
264097 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264094 +++$+++ 264096 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.179182160E09 +++$+++ I don't care enough to contest it, so whatever.  +++$+++ :::I don't care enough to contest it, so whatever. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
264098 +++$+++ DickClarkMises +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264094 +++$+++ 264097 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.179182460E09 +++$+++ Well, not to put too fine a point on it, but this aloofness in deleting the work of others, particularly newcomers, is unbecoming an admin and in my opinion is not compatible with [[WP:BITE]]. ...but I can't force you to care about that, I suppose. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::Well, not to put too fine a point on it, but this aloofness in deleting the work of others, particularly newcomers, is unbecoming an admin and in my opinion is not compatible with [[WP:BITE]]. ...but I can't force you to care about that, I suppose. Cheers, [[User:DickClarkMises|DickClarkMises]] 15:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
264099 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264094 +++$+++ 264098 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.179182760E09 +++$+++ Perhaps it is a very good introduction to Wikipedia. You can spend hours contributing, but you only hear something when you make a mistake.  +++$+++ :::::Perhaps it is a very good introduction to Wikipedia. You can spend hours contributing, but you only hear something when you make a mistake. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:46, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

526242 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-08 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.157781120E09 +++$+++ Pretty cool,huh?  +++$+++ Pretty cool,huh? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 22:52, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
526243 +++$+++ Pm shef +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526242 +++$+++ 526242 +++$+++ 2006-09-08 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.157780340E09 +++$+++ Hey ER, I did see the new sock, I commented on your sockpuppetry evidence page. Regarding the [[Vaughan]] demographics issue, the reason I reverted it to the Religion table is because that same anon (or someone likeminded) continues to put in the ethnicity table, but without any citations. I haven't been able to find any reference for the ethnicity numbers, so I added a similar (if not totally the same) breakdown, religion, which there is ample references for. If you, or anyone else for that matter, is able to locate proper references for ethnicities, I'd be happy to see it included. By the way, thanks for keeping up the vigilance with VW\/JC and the whole mess! --  +++$+++ *Hey ER, I did see the new sock, I commented on your sockpuppetry evidence page. Regarding the [[Vaughan]] demographics issue, the reason I reverted it to the Religion table is because that same anon (or someone likeminded) continues to put in the ethnicity table, but without any citations. I haven't been able to find any reference for the ethnicity numbers, so I added a similar (if not totally the same) breakdown, religion, which there is ample references for. If you, or anyone else for that matter, is able to locate proper references for ethnicities, I'd be happy to see it included. By the way, thanks for keeping up the vigilance with VW/JC and the whole mess! -- [[User:Pm shef|pm_shef]] 22:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
526244 +++$+++ Pm shef +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526242 +++$+++ 526243 +++$+++ 2006-09-09 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.157793840E09 +++$+++ My mistake! Sorry about that. --  +++$+++ :*My mistake! Sorry about that. -- [[User:Pm shef|pm_shef]] 02:24, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

480923 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-16 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.145241840E09 +++$+++ Are you having any luck with anything? Not much seems to be happening. How's this for a proposal. Since the list of 2005 storms is now a FL, that should not be touched at all. What should happen in the future is this; have only important storms in the season summary (Dennis, Emily, Katrina, Rita, Vince, Wilma, Alpha, and Zeta) with brief descriptions (1 paragraph at most), leave the list alone, and still have articles for every storm. This way, the information will only be replicated twice instead of having it superflously on the 2005 page.  +++$+++ Are you having any luck with anything? Not much seems to be happening. How's this for a proposal. Since the list of 2005 storms is now a FL, that should not be touched at all. What should happen in the future is this; have only important storms in the season summary (Dennis, Emily, Katrina, Rita, Vince, Wilma, Alpha, and Zeta) with brief descriptions (1 paragraph at most), leave the list alone, and still have articles for every storm. This way, the information will only be replicated twice instead of having it superflously on the 2005 page. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] 19:44, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
480924 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480923 +++$+++ 480923 +++$+++ 2006-04-17 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.145262300E09 +++$+++ Feel better! Alpha should definetely be mentioned because it was the one that finished the names, though Wilma broke the storm record. Yea, that sounds good for the season summary.  +++$+++ :Feel better! Alpha should definetely be mentioned because it was the one that finished the names, though Wilma broke the storm record. Yea, that sounds good for the season summary. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] 01:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

264100 +++$+++ Stephenb +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-15 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.179252000E09 +++$+++ I appear to be unblocked again! :-) Cheers!  +++$+++ I appear to be unblocked again! :-) Cheers! [[User:Stephenb|Stephenb]] [[User talk:Stephenb|(Talk)]] 11:00, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
264101 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264100 +++$+++ 264100 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.179503580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for getting in touch. The band does not appear to meet out criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. We have notability guidelines, which are outlined at [[WP:MUSIC]]. Feel free to resubmit the article when (and only when) the band meets those guidelines. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks for getting in touch. The band does not appear to meet out criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. We have notability guidelines, which are outlined at [[WP:MUSIC]]. Feel free to resubmit the article when (and only when) the band meets those guidelines. Cheers, [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

264102 +++$+++ Anthony DiPierro +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-19 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.179606480E09 +++$+++ How is that not the most ridiculous thing you've ever seen?  +++$+++ How is that not the most ridiculous thing you've ever seen? [[Special:Emailuser/Anthony DiPierro|anthony]] 13:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
264103 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264102 +++$+++ 264102 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.179607440E09 +++$+++ I don't think it's ridiculous at all, and citing \"I hate them\" is not a particularly good reason, but my feelings aren't strong enough to debate it. I think it's a shame, however, that some editors are spending a lot of time doing something that a bot could have been employed to do. Also, I'm not sure consensus was fully reached (judging by the AI discussion), and it was especially unwise to remove them ''en masse'' without edit summaries pointing towards the relevant debate.  +++$+++ :I don't think it's ridiculous at all, and citing "I hate them" is not a particularly good reason, but my feelings aren't strong enough to debate it. I think it's a shame, however, that some editors are spending a lot of time doing something that a bot could have been employed to do. Also, I'm not sure consensus was fully reached (judging by the AI discussion), and it was especially unwise to remove them ''en masse'' without edit summaries pointing towards the relevant debate. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
264104 +++$+++ Anthony DiPierro +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264102 +++$+++ 264103 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.179620040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[Special:Emailuser/Anthony DiPierro|anthony]] 17:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

526247 +++$+++ Enochlau +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-10 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.157920080E09 +++$+++ Sure. I'll watch out for edits from this account past the 24-hour mark. Thanks for the heads up.  +++$+++ Sure. I'll watch out for edits from this account past the 24-hour mark. Thanks for the heads up. [[User:Enochlau|enochlau]] ([[User talk:Enochlau|talk]]) 13:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
526248 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526247 +++$+++ 526247 +++$+++ 2006-09-10 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.157934060E09 +++$+++ Note, I've responded on the [[User_talk:Kyereh_Mireku#BOT_blocking|user's talk page]]. User has a history of vandalism has been repeatedly warned not to try to use banned [[User:Kingbot]]. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Note, I've responded on the [[User_talk:Kyereh_Mireku#BOT_blocking|user's talk page]]. User has a history of vandalism has been repeatedly warned not to try to use banned [[User:Kingbot]]. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 17:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

264105 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-20 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.179645540E09 +++$+++ Just a note:  GimmeBot fixed the errors in {{t1|ArticleHistory}} at [[Talk:Psycho (1960 film)]] and [[Talk:Press Gang]], in case you want to have a look.  If you're not sure how to set up ArticleHistory, you can just leave the templates and request at the articlehistory talk page that the bot convert them to ArticleHistory.   +++$+++ Just a note:  GimmeBot fixed the errors in {{t1|ArticleHistory}} at [[Talk:Psycho (1960 film)]] and [[Talk:Press Gang]], in case you want to have a look.  If you're not sure how to set up ArticleHistory, you can just leave the templates and request at the articlehistory talk page that the bot convert them to ArticleHistory.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
264106 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264105 +++$+++ 264105 +++$+++ 2007-05-20 09:39:00 +++$+++ 1.179679140E09 +++$+++ Thanks -- I checked the differences and will use the fixed versions as templates.  +++$+++ :Thanks -- I checked the differences and will use the fixed versions as templates. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:39, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
264107 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264105 +++$+++ 264106 +++$+++ 2007-05-20 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.179717300E09 +++$+++ If you plan on doing a lot of ArticleHistory templates, it will be useful to download from {{User|Dr pda}} his articlehistory script.  It's pretty hard to do it correctly without that tool.  Regards,  +++$+++ ::If you plan on doing a lot of ArticleHistory templates, it will be useful to download from {{User|Dr pda}} his articlehistory script.  It's pretty hard to do it correctly without that tool.  Regards, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

526250 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-12 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.158111840E09 +++$+++ MILHIST needs to tag and rate [[Robert Lee Scott, Jr.]].   +++$+++ MILHIST needs to tag and rate [[Robert Lee Scott, Jr.]].  [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 18:44, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
526251 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526250 +++$+++ 526250 +++$+++ 2006-09-13 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.158166680E09 +++$+++ See responses to both of your inputs on my talk page. Also, just a minute ago my article on [[Gilwell Park]] made FA, so now I have another-;)  +++$+++ :See responses to both of your inputs on my talk page. Also, just a minute ago my article on [[Gilwell Park]] made FA, so now I have another-;) [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 09:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

264108 +++$+++ Best username yet +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264108 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-20 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.179702240E09 +++$+++ Why have you reverted the information about Bulger's mother? It's well known in the journalistic community - do a google search on it and you'll find plenty of things mentioning it. -- +++$+++ Why have you reverted the information about Bulger's mother? It's well known in the journalistic community - do a google search on it and you'll find plenty of things mentioning it. --[[User:Best username yet|Best username yet]] 16:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
264109 +++$+++ Best username yet +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264108 +++$+++ 264108 +++$+++ 2007-05-20 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.179720780E09 +++$+++ I've now had this explained to me, I'll work on finding some decent sources. But for the moment I'll work on keeping everything out of the article that is untrue rather than adding things that are true.  +++$+++ :I've now had this explained to me, I'll work on finding some decent sources. But for the moment I'll work on keeping everything out of the article that is untrue rather than adding things that are true. [[User:Best username yet|Best username yet]] 21:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
264110 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264108 +++$+++ 264108 +++$+++ 2007-05-20 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.179730200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply. I've left the message on one other user's talk page, and also the talk page for the list of episodes. If the episode category exists (which it does), then it ''should'' be used. This does make sense, right? In the very small number of cases when dialogue is really important, then you can ''integrate'' them into the plot section. We do not have separate sections for them. Thanks for your contributions, I hope you will rectify the errors.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your reply. I've left the message on one other user's talk page, and also the talk page for the list of episodes. If the episode category exists (which it does), then it ''should'' be used. This does make sense, right? In the very small number of cases when dialogue is really important, then you can ''integrate'' them into the plot section. We do not have separate sections for them. Thanks for your contributions, I hope you will rectify the errors. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
264111 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264108 +++$+++ 264108 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.179810180E09 +++$+++ Do you mean those boxes? You can copy this code: <nowiki>{{wikiquote|The Golden Girls}}<\/nowiki> If the name of the page on Wikiquotes is identical to one on Wikipedia, you can just have <nowiki>{{wikiquote}}<\/nowiki>. So if you put 'wikiquote' only on \"The Actor\" article, it would point to \"the Actor\" on Wikiquote.   +++$+++ :Do you mean those boxes? You can copy this code: <nowiki>{{wikiquote|The Golden Girls}}</nowiki> If the name of the page on Wikiquotes is identical to one on Wikipedia, you can just have <nowiki>{{wikiquote}}</nowiki>. So if you put 'wikiquote' only on "The Actor" article, it would point to "the Actor" on Wikiquote.  [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

44018 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.300935180E09 +++$+++ Just a passing comment but the debate about Find a Grave continues to rage. I am not going to change it again because quite frankly I don't care much about that article but I wanted to make you aware that not all editors agree with that statement that its not a good External link. -- +++$+++ Just a passing comment but the debate about Find a Grave continues to rage. I am not going to change it again because quite frankly I don't care much about that article but I wanted to make you aware that not all editors agree with that statement that its not a good External link. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 19:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
44019 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44018 +++$+++ 44018 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.300935840E09 +++$+++ I am fully aware of its status. See [[Wikipedia:External links\/Perennial websites]]. The people who want to use it are in a very clear minority, and some of them seem to have no purpose on Wikipedia other than adding links to that site for linkfarming purposes.  +++$+++ :I am fully aware of its status. See [[Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites]]. The people who want to use it are in a very clear minority, and some of them seem to have no purpose on Wikipedia other than adding links to that site for linkfarming purposes. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] ([[User talk:DreamGuy#top|talk]]) 20:04, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

480925 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-24 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.145939880E09 +++$+++ I doubt A class is attainable for a storm like Irene. You need a lot of info, but it can't be redundant. Epsilon has forecasting as a separate section because that was the reason for the article at the time. Irene had no real reason, so forecasting should be part of the storm history (unless the concensus is different). The end is in sight, but not quite there yet. Yea, the southern hemisphere seasons has bugged me for a while, but I made a personal pledge I wouldn't do much there (I did 1492-1890 in the Atlantic, nearly all of the WPAC, and all of the north Indian, and didn't want to waste any more wiki time on seasons). However, that sounds like a good idea. I would split it into two- Southwest Indian as one and Southeast\/Australia\/South Pacific as the other. The only problem with that is the naming. [[2005-2006 Southeast Indian Ocean and South Indian Ocean cyclone season]]? What about South Indian and South Pacific, with, say, 130\xba East as the dividing marker?  +++$+++ I doubt A class is attainable for a storm like Irene. You need a lot of info, but it can't be redundant. Epsilon has forecasting as a separate section because that was the reason for the article at the time. Irene had no real reason, so forecasting should be part of the storm history (unless the concensus is different). The end is in sight, but not quite there yet. Yea, the southern hemisphere seasons has bugged me for a while, but I made a personal pledge I wouldn't do much there (I did 1492-1890 in the Atlantic, nearly all of the WPAC, and all of the north Indian, and didn't want to waste any more wiki time on seasons). However, that sounds like a good idea. I would split it into two- Southwest Indian as one and Southeast/Australia/South Pacific as the other. The only problem with that is the naming. [[2005-2006 Southeast Indian Ocean and South Indian Ocean cyclone season]]? What about South Indian and South Pacific, with, say, 130º East as the dividing marker? [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] 21:38, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
480926 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480925 +++$+++ 480925 +++$+++ 2006-04-24 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.145945640E09 +++$+++ Good job on B class, and good point about the southern hemisphere. I forgot about the Australian scale. Well, a Southwest article and an Australian\/South Pacific article works, but, at the most, only back to 2000, I would guess.  +++$+++ :Good job on B class, and good point about the southern hemisphere. I forgot about the Australian scale. Well, a Southwest article and an Australian/South Pacific article works, but, at the most, only back to 2000, I would guess. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] 23:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
480927 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480925 +++$+++ 480926 +++$+++ 2006-04-25 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.145948640E09 +++$+++ I don't think all the way back is necessary, at least not now. A 3 way split is not needed, either. Just the 2 way split should be fine from 2000 to the future.  +++$+++ ::I don't think all the way back is necessary, at least not now. A 3 way split is not needed, either. Just the 2 way split should be fine from 2000 to the future. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] 00:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
480928 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480925 +++$+++ 480927 +++$+++ 2006-04-26 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.146076920E09 +++$+++ Good luck.  +++$+++ :::Good luck. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] 11:42, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

526256 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-20 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.158789060E09 +++$+++ This is a FA on the King of Thailand that has had repeated vandalism since the coup started. I think it needs locked til things settle down, can you help? I helped get it to FA?  +++$+++ This is a FA on the King of Thailand that has had repeated vandalism since the coup started. I think it needs locked til things settle down, can you help? I helped get it to FA? [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 14:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
526257 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526256 +++$+++ 526256 +++$+++ 2006-09-20 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.158806160E09 +++$+++ Someone already locked it. Thanks anyway.  +++$+++ :Someone already locked it. Thanks anyway. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 19:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

264116 +++$+++ Wowweb +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.180642140E09 +++$+++ Hello, I noticed that you are a keen writer on television. I worked for ATV\/Central (79 - 94) and Merdian (94 -99) and just wondered if you ever worked in the industry. I have loads of knowledge about the industry but of course a lot of it is first hand and cannot be mentioned here. Anyway just thought i'd say hello to a fellow TV enthusiast!  +++$+++ Hello, I noticed that you are a keen writer on television. I worked for ATV/Central (79 - 94) and Merdian (94 -99) and just wondered if you ever worked in the industry. I have loads of knowledge about the industry but of course a lot of it is first hand and cannot be mentioned here. Anyway just thought i'd say hello to a fellow TV enthusiast! [[User:Wowweb|Wowweb]] 13:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
264117 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264116 +++$+++ 264116 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.180642440E09 +++$+++ Hello! No, I've never worked in the industry: I'm a mere academic. It's sometimes frustrating when you want to make a point to add depth to an article, or add a fact, but can't. That's there, or course, to protect the encyclopedia, since anyone can edit it and claim to have first hand experience\/have been told by someone \"in the know\", etc. What was your role within ATV\/Meridian?  +++$+++ :Hello! No, I've never worked in the industry: I'm a mere academic. It's sometimes frustrating when you want to make a point to add depth to an article, or add a fact, but can't. That's there, or course, to protect the encyclopedia, since anyone can edit it and claim to have first hand experience/have been told by someone "in the know", etc. What was your role within ATV/Meridian? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

264119 +++$+++ HoneyBee +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264119 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.180663800E09 +++$+++ I'd like to add cast and characters to Jaws movies. Any suggestion? Should I put the \"red link\" first, then create the article? Or create the article first, and then merge it to the existing article? Thank you.  +++$+++ I'd like to add cast and characters to Jaws movies. Any suggestion? Should I put the "red link" first, then create the article? Or create the article first, and then merge it to the existing article? Thank you. [[User:HoneyBee|HoneyBee]] 19:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
264120 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264119 +++$+++ 264119 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.180664160E09 +++$+++ I would spend time working on individual articles, rather than just creating all of the stubs. Perhaps work on them offline, or in userspace: e.g. [[User:HoneyBee\/Martin Brody]]. I've seen some truly abysmal character articles. There's no point in adding the red links. Anyway, as ''Jaws'' is a featured article, we're not supposed to have red inks on that page.  +++$+++ :I would spend time working on individual articles, rather than just creating all of the stubs. Perhaps work on them offline, or in userspace: e.g. [[User:HoneyBee/Martin Brody]]. I've seen some truly abysmal character articles. There's no point in adding the red links. Anyway, as ''Jaws'' is a featured article, we're not supposed to have red inks on that page. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
264121 +++$+++ HoneyBee +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264119 +++$+++ 264120 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.180664820E09 +++$+++ Okay, I understand now. Thanks for the info. Btw, if for example I work on them (characters article) in userspace, how do I put them in the article?  +++$+++ ::Okay, I understand now. Thanks for the info. Btw, if for example I work on them (characters article) in userspace, how do I put them in the article? [[User:HoneyBee|HoneyBee]] 19:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
264122 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264119 +++$+++ 264120 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.180664940E09 +++$+++ You could just copy and paste the code.  +++$+++ ::You could just copy and paste the code. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
264123 +++$+++ HoneyBee +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264119 +++$+++ 264122 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.182216360E09 +++$+++ Sorry about the [[Jaws 2]] cast table. I thought they were okay, 'cause I saw one in [[Jaws (film)|Jaws]] section and assumed that was being used. Is the example for a correct cast list should be like [[Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back]]?  +++$+++ :::Sorry about the [[Jaws 2]] cast table. I thought they were okay, 'cause I saw one in [[Jaws (film)|Jaws]] section and assumed that was being used. Is the example for a correct cast list should be like [[Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back]]? [[User:HoneyBee|HoneyBee]] 18:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
264124 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264119 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.182216540E09 +++$+++ No problem. I removed the cast table from ''Jaws'' and corrected most of that editor's other edits.  ''The Empire Strikes Back'' needs work, but it's much closer to what we should be doing. The best examples are [[Halloween (1978 film)]] and [[Halloween II]].  +++$+++ :::::No problem. I removed the cast table from ''Jaws'' and corrected most of that editor's other edits.  ''The Empire Strikes Back'' needs work, but it's much closer to what we should be doing. The best examples are [[Halloween (1978 film)]] and [[Halloween II]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
264125 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264119 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.182224040E09 +++$+++ Got it. What about casting section from [[Jaws: The Revenge]], I read the article and I think it's a good example, right?  20:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ ::::::Got it. What about casting section from [[Jaws: The Revenge]], I read the article and I think it's a good example, right?  20:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
264126 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264119 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.182224160E09 +++$+++ Yeah, ''JtR'' is OK, if I do say so myself. I chose the two ''Halloween''s because they're both featured articles.  +++$+++ :::::::Yeah, ''JtR'' is OK, if I do say so myself. I chose the two ''Halloween''s because they're both featured articles. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
264127 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264119 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.182224280E09 +++$+++ Actually, Jaws has the beginnings of a cast section: it just needs developing and given a third level heading within 'Production'.  +++$+++ :::::::::Actually, Jaws has the beginnings of a cast section: it just needs developing and given a third level heading within 'Production'. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

526265 +++$+++ Kt66 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526265 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-23 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.159036680E09 +++$+++ Hi there, it would be nice if you can have a look on my new trial to include the further development of Geshe [[Michael Roach]]. The sources are completely from Geshe Michael Roach himself, and there is no doubt about this and that this happened and published by himself in 2003. So the WP rules are - as far as I understood it for protecting people from wrong facts and the like - but not for misusing avoiding critical points. The sources are - as far as I can see not against WP Rules - the only argument of [[User:Ekajati]] for deletion is: the Sources are now not more present at Geshe Michael Roaches internetsite, but this does not deny their validity. I feel in that case the desicion of what to do should be balanced by the validity of the facts, the WP Rules and the need for a proper article. Please be so kind to have a look and leave a comment. I think there will be a ongoing dispute otherwise in the future too. As you can see the main activities in that article were either to include critical points or to remove it completely. Now [[User:Ekajati]] was seccessfull of completely removing it. -- +++$+++ Hi there, it would be nice if you can have a look on my new trial to include the further development of Geshe [[Michael Roach]]. The sources are completely from Geshe Michael Roach himself, and there is no doubt about this and that this happened and published by himself in 2003. So the WP rules are - as far as I understood it for protecting people from wrong facts and the like - but not for misusing avoiding critical points. The sources are - as far as I can see not against WP Rules - the only argument of [[User:Ekajati]] for deletion is: the Sources are now not more present at Geshe Michael Roaches internetsite, but this does not deny their validity. I feel in that case the desicion of what to do should be balanced by the validity of the facts, the WP Rules and the need for a proper article. Please be so kind to have a look and leave a comment. I think there will be a ongoing dispute otherwise in the future too. As you can see the main activities in that article were either to include critical points or to remove it completely. Now [[User:Ekajati]] was seccessfull of completely removing it. --[[User:Kt66|Kt66]] 11:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
526266 +++$+++ Kt66 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526265 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-23 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.159043760E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much. -- +++$+++ ::Thank you very much. --[[User:Kt66|Kt66]] 13:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

1979 +++$+++ Robertgreer +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-02 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.283468340E09 +++$+++ I would like to remove the ridiculous remarks of Hommequidanse (and your perfectly reasonable reply). Hommequidanse has either been thrown off Wikipedia, or the signature may have been a forgery to begin with. In either event, there's no need for his impertinence to clutter up the [[Talk:Le corsaire|Corsaire]] talk page. \u2014  +++$+++ I would like to remove the ridiculous remarks of Hommequidanse (and your perfectly reasonable reply). Hommequidanse has either been thrown off Wikipedia, or the signature may have been a forgery to begin with. In either event, there's no need for his impertinence to clutter up the [[Talk:Le corsaire|Corsaire]] talk page. — [[User:Robertgreer|Robert Greer]] ([[User talk:Robertgreer|talk]]) 15:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
1980 +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1979 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-03 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.283497500E09 +++$+++ yes, please do, and thank you. I just re-read Hommequidanse's comment and got the biggest kick out if it! Some people (sigh) ... -- +++$+++ ::yes, please do, and thank you. I just re-read Hommequidanse's comment and got the biggest kick out if it! Some people (sigh) ... --[[User:Mrlopez2681|Mrlopez2681]] ([[User talk:Mrlopez2681#top|talk]]) 00:05, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
1981 +++$+++ Robertgreer +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1979 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-03 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.283544600E09 +++$+++ Done! \u2014  +++$+++ :::Done! — [[User:Robertgreer|Robert Greer]] ([[User talk:Robertgreer|talk]]) 13:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

462705 +++$+++ Abebenjoe +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ 462705 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-27 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.306498860E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Abebenjoe|Abebenjoe]] ([[User talk:Abebenjoe|talk]]) 05:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
462706 +++$+++ Abebenjoe +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ 462705 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.306499400E09 +++$+++ So MPs, and this is how I've always interrupted it, and it seems that is also how the House of Commons sees it, lose their status as MPs when the Parliament is dissolved through the dropping of the writ, the term ends there. So, the argument goes that E-day is the day that the new MP starts, with the swearing in only a formality. But since we are dealing with Westminster rules, they are conventions and not really written down rules. That is why the HoC website cites E-day as the first day of the term. June 2 second will be used mostly to swear members in, though members of the cabinet are already sworn in. As an aside, the Prime Minister never ceases to be the Prime Minister when parliament is dissolved, unlike his cabinet and fellow MPs.~--[[User:Abebenjoe|Abebenjoe]] ([[User talk:Abebenjoe|talk]]) 05:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)-- +++$+++ ::So MPs, and this is how I've always interrupted it, and it seems that is also how the House of Commons sees it, lose their status as MPs when the Parliament is dissolved through the dropping of the writ, the term ends there. So, the argument goes that E-day is the day that the new MP starts, with the swearing in only a formality. But since we are dealing with Westminster rules, they are conventions and not really written down rules. That is why the HoC website cites E-day as the first day of the term. June 2 second will be used mostly to swear members in, though members of the cabinet are already sworn in. As an aside, the Prime Minister never ceases to be the Prime Minister when parliament is dissolved, unlike his cabinet and fellow MPs.~--[[User:Abebenjoe|Abebenjoe]] ([[User talk:Abebenjoe|talk]]) 05:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)--[[User:Abebenjoe|Abebenjoe]] ([[User talk:Abebenjoe|talk]]) 05:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

264129 +++$+++ Private Detective +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264129 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-06 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.181160180E09 +++$+++ I know what you've been up to ;) Go for it my son!-- +++$+++ I know what you've been up to ;) Go for it my son!--[[User:Private Detective|Private Detective]] 13:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
264130 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264129 +++$+++ 264129 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.181160360E09 +++$+++ Mmm, OK. (?)  +++$+++ :Mmm, OK. (?) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

576126 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-16 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.195201740E09 +++$+++ Well, hey there, Mongo; but how does that song go? \"The Wild Women of Wongo\"? Do you play the [[Bongo drum|bongo]]? Catch up with you sometime. PS- Cool user page. --''' +++$+++ Well, hey there, Mongo; but how does that song go? "The Wild Women of Wongo"? Do you play the [[Bongo drum|bongo]]? Catch up with you sometime. PS- Cool user page. --'''[[User:Rodhullandemu|<font color="7F007F">'''Rodhullandemu'''</font>]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|please reply here]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rodhullandemu|contribs]]) 00:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
576127 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576126 +++$+++ 576126 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.195202040E09 +++$+++ Not heard that one.-- +++$+++ :Not heard that one.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 00:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

1989 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1989 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-09 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.299667080E09 +++$+++ Are you sure the picture is of King George and Queen Mary in 1911?  The reason why it can't be them is that the Gateway was only completed in 1924, as you will read in the [[Gateway of India]] article.  It is more likely that it is the visit of the Prince of Wales (later Edward VIII) in 1921, when the gateway might have been near completion.  The raised hems of some of the women's dresses (in the crowd) too is suggestive of the 1920s.  It is a great picture!  Thanks for uploading it.   +++$+++ Are you sure the picture is of King George and Queen Mary in 1911?  The reason why it can't be them is that the Gateway was only completed in 1924, as you will read in the [[Gateway of India]] article.  It is more likely that it is the visit of the Prince of Wales (later Edward VIII) in 1921, when the gateway might have been near completion.  The raised hems of some of the women's dresses (in the crowd) too is suggestive of the 1920s.  It is a great picture!  Thanks for uploading it.  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 02:38, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
1990 +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ Mrlopez2681 +++$+++ 1989 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.299691560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up - I guess the book I scanned the article from REALLY got it wrong!! -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the heads up - I guess the book I scanned the article from REALLY got it wrong!! --[[User:Mrlopez2681|Mrlopez2681]] ([[User talk:Mrlopez2681#top|talk]]) 09:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

264135 +++$+++ Ernst_Stavro_Blofeld +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264135 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-17 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.182145680E09 +++$+++ Done -sorry they are promo photos not screeshots - I usually add a rationale but its late. I have my setting on my computer with natually the largest pixel setting on images so they probably do look huge to the standard setting. Try not to target my work though - I noticed you have now edited Hang em High, Thanks  +++$+++ Done -sorry they are promo photos not screeshots - I usually add a rationale but its late. I have my setting on my computer with natually the largest pixel setting on images so they probably do look huge to the standard setting. Try not to target my work though - I noticed you have now edited Hang em High, Thanks [[User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld| <font color="darkblue">'''''♦ Sir Blofeld ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Ernst Stavro Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Purple">'''"Expecting you"'''</font></font color> ]][[Special:Contributions/Ernst_Stavro_Blofeld|<font size="-4"><font color="Grey">'''Contribs'''</font></font color>]]</sup> 22:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
264136 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264135 +++$+++ 264135 +++$+++ 2007-06-17 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.182145980E09 +++$+++ Yeah, mistakes happen. It is standard practice to check contributions of editors where there is a problem, as it's likely there will be similar errors in other articles. I usually do it; don't feel specifically targetted.  +++$+++ :Yeah, mistakes happen. It is standard practice to check contributions of editors where there is a problem, as it's likely there will be similar errors in other articles. I usually do it; don't feel specifically targetted. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

1993 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 1993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-25 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.253947020E09 +++$+++ For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see [[User:Rlevse\/Today\/Happy Me Day!]] and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.<span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see [[User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day!]] and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 23:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
1994 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 1993 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.253948640E09 +++$+++ Sep 26 For you. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::Sep 26 For you. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 00:04, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

526283 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-27 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.159352160E09 +++$+++ Cheers!  +++$+++ Cheers! [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
526284 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526283 +++$+++ 526283 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.159356420E09 +++$+++ Good, that's what I like. You opened my eyes.  Great ideas, take a look now.  I'll do the note thing tommorrow (I added the El Monumento link), even though everything can be found in the references.  Tell me how it looks.  +++$+++ *Good, that's what I like. You opened my eyes.  Great ideas, take a look now.  I'll do the note thing tommorrow (I added the El Monumento link), even though everything can be found in the references.  Tell me how it looks. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

264141 +++$+++ RobNS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264141 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-18 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.182218880E09 +++$+++ JPS, can I PLEASE put back the table in [[Jaws (film)|Jaws]]? I promise to keep the colours out (at this point), and make the list sortable. Thank you in advance, best.-- +++$+++ JPS, can I PLEASE put back the table in [[Jaws (film)|Jaws]]? I promise to keep the colours out (at this point), and make the list sortable. Thank you in advance, best.--[[User:RobNS|<b><font color="green">''Rob''</font>]][[User talk:RobNS|<font color="blue">''NS''</font></b>]] 19:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
264142 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264141 +++$+++ 264141 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.182219540E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films\/Style guidelines]] does not accommodate this. Jaws is a featured article, nominated and judged as an example of Wikipedia's best work. Therefore, the style guidelines must be adhered to.  +++$+++ :[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines]] does not accommodate this. Jaws is a featured article, nominated and judged as an example of Wikipedia's best work. Therefore, the style guidelines must be adhered to. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
264143 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264141 +++$+++ 264142 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.182233460E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films\/Style_guidelines#Cast_and_crew_information]]. [[WP:EFFORT|Effort]] is not an acceptable argument for keeping, either.  +++$+++ ::[[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines#Cast_and_crew_information]]. [[WP:EFFORT|Effort]] is not an acceptable argument for keeping, either. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
264144 +++$+++ RobNS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264141 +++$+++ 264143 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.182233880E09 +++$+++ OK JPS, I suppose you are correct. I just think my efforts on [[Jaws (film)|Jaws]] made the cast easier to read, and that is all I was aiming for. However, if you look at my contributions or history, I am not confrontational and, like you, appreciate a consensus. You will no longer find me contributing to films, but I will contribute in other areas, where I can be useful. Best wishes.-- +++$+++ :::OK JPS, I suppose you are correct. I just think my efforts on [[Jaws (film)|Jaws]] made the cast easier to read, and that is all I was aiming for. However, if you look at my contributions or history, I am not confrontational and, like you, appreciate a consensus. You will no longer find me contributing to films, but I will contribute in other areas, where I can be useful. Best wishes.--[[User:RobNS|<b><font color="green">''Rob''</font>]][[User talk:RobNS|<font color="blue">''NS''</font></b>]] 23:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
264145 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264141 +++$+++ 264144 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.182233400E09 +++$+++ Alientraveller, you might like to see my explanations to RobNS on his talk page.  +++$+++ ::::Alientraveller, you might like to see my explanations to RobNS on his talk page. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
264146 +++$+++ RobNS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264141 +++$+++ 264145 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.182235260E09 +++$+++ OK both of you, I'm not really that upset, more a case of severe disappointment. I will abide by the rules. Best wishes to you both.-- +++$+++ :::::OK both of you, I'm not really that upset, more a case of severe disappointment. I will abide by the rules. Best wishes to you both.--[[User:RobNS|<b><font color="green">''Rob''</font>]][[User talk:RobNS|<font color="blue">''NS''</font></b>]] 23:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

499311 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499311 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-17 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.163767320E09 +++$+++ ... you get an idea of the sort of people I hang out with. :D Enjoy your day, and make the most of it, 'cause it only happens once! <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ... you get an idea of the sort of people I hang out with. :D Enjoy your day, and make the most of it, 'cause it only happens once! <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 04:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
499312 +++$+++ Ginkgo100 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499311 +++$+++ 499311 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.163768460E09 +++$+++ My happy birthdays here! --[[User:Ginkgo100|Ginkgo100]] <sup>[[User talk:Ginkgo100|''talk'']] \xb7 <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :My happy birthdays here! --[[User:Ginkgo100|Ginkgo100]] <sup>[[User talk:Ginkgo100|''talk'']] · <font color="green">[[User:Ginkgo100/Esperanza|''e@'']]</font></sup> 05:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
499313 +++$+++ Jam01 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499311 +++$+++ 499312 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.163773440E09 +++$+++ Happy birthday! Enjoy your day! [[User:Jam01|Jam]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ ::Happy birthday! Enjoy your day! [[User:Jam01|Jam]]<font color="green">[[User:Jam01/Esperanza|01]]</font> 06:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

2000 +++$+++ Seresin +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-25 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.264488660E09 +++$+++ Do not upload this image again; you will be blocked if you do. If you wish to contest the deletion, take it to DRV. ''\xf7 +++$+++ Do not upload this image again; you will be blocked if you do. If you wish to contest the deletion, take it to DRV. ''÷[[user:seresin|seresin]]'' 22:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
2001 +++$+++ Seresin +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2000 +++$+++ 2000 +++$+++ 2010-01-25 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.264490520E09 +++$+++ Then update [[:File:Helping Haiti.PNG]] on Commons. The FfD determined that we use that image. ''\xf7 +++$+++ :Then update [[:File:Helping Haiti.PNG]] on Commons. The FfD determined that we use that image. ''÷[[user:seresin|seresin]]'' 23:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

44024 +++$+++ 87.114.22.229 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-31 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.301635860E09 +++$+++ Describing someone's comments as rants does not comply with the blp policy. Please can you express yourself without resorting to such insults. Blp is just as important on talkpages as on the article itself.[[Special:Contributions\/87.114.22.229|87.114.22.229]] ( +++$+++ Describing someone's comments as rants does not comply with the blp policy. Please can you express yourself without resorting to such insults. Blp is just as important on talkpages as on the article itself.[[Special:Contributions/87.114.22.229|87.114.22.229]] ([[User talk:87.114.22.229|talk]]) 22:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
44025 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44024 +++$+++ 44024 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.301646240E09 +++$+++ I originally deleted the above post by an IP editor as bizarre and pointless but decided to answer to figure out if there's any real content behind it that can be cleared up. \"Rant\" is pretty widespread and innocuous term, and I cannot understand any possible interpretation of [[WP:BLP]] that would consider the use of that off the cuff remark on an article talk page as a violation. I also think it's a stretch to call it an insult. It was a description of the type of statements the individual in question was making to point out that those statements did not seem notable enough to be included in the article, and I know of no alternate term that would describe it as accurately. If you get that easily offended I think you'll have a difficult time participating in any conversation here, but, hey, best of luck to you.  +++$+++ :I originally deleted the above post by an IP editor as bizarre and pointless but decided to answer to figure out if there's any real content behind it that can be cleared up. "Rant" is pretty widespread and innocuous term, and I cannot understand any possible interpretation of [[WP:BLP]] that would consider the use of that off the cuff remark on an article talk page as a violation. I also think it's a stretch to call it an insult. It was a description of the type of statements the individual in question was making to point out that those statements did not seem notable enough to be included in the article, and I know of no alternate term that would describe it as accurately. If you get that easily offended I think you'll have a difficult time participating in any conversation here, but, hey, best of luck to you. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] ([[User talk:DreamGuy#top|talk]]) 01:24, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
44026 +++$+++ 87.114.22.229 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44024 +++$+++ 44025 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.301666640E09 +++$+++ if you cannot see that calling the father of a murdered persons comments about that murder \"rants\" is problematic then I don't think you should edit any blps. It is simply your opinion that they are rants. If you think they are not notable then simply say that. You need to be more careful about your \"off the cuff remarks\". A rant is a clearly derogatory term especially in this context.[[Special:Contributions\/87.114.22.229|87.114.22.229]] ( +++$+++ ::if you cannot see that calling the father of a murdered persons comments about that murder "rants" is problematic then I don't think you should edit any blps. It is simply your opinion that they are rants. If you think they are not notable then simply say that. You need to be more careful about your "off the cuff remarks". A rant is a clearly derogatory term especially in this context.[[Special:Contributions/87.114.22.229|87.114.22.229]] ([[User talk:87.114.22.229|talk]]) 07:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
44027 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44024 +++$+++ 44026 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.301782020E09 +++$+++ I already had said they were not notable, some people had claimed they were, so I had to explain why they weren't notable. Your personal opinions on what articles I (or anyone else) should or should not edit means nothing to anyone, so please don't bother going that route.  +++$+++ :::I already had said they were not notable, some people had claimed they were, so I had to explain why they weren't notable. Your personal opinions on what articles I (or anyone else) should or should not edit means nothing to anyone, so please don't bother going that route. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] ([[User talk:DreamGuy#top|talk]]) 15:07, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
44028 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ 44024 +++$+++ 44024 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.301646720E09 +++$+++ As was already posted to your talk page, the primary problem is one of [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]], as it appears your edits to this project seem to be solely for the purpose of placing what amounts to advertisements for a specific modern radio drama that you are all but certain to be involved with in some way. In non-polite terms this is also called [[WP:SPAM|spam]].  +++$+++ :As was already posted to your talk page, the primary problem is one of [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]], as it appears your edits to this project seem to be solely for the purpose of placing what amounts to advertisements for a specific modern radio drama that you are all but certain to be involved with in some way. In non-polite terms this is also called [[WP:SPAM|spam]]. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] ([[User talk:DreamGuy#top|talk]]) 01:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

264147 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-21 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.182452760E09 +++$+++ That made me laugh out loud.  Thanks for brightening up my day!   +++$+++ That made me laugh out loud.  Thanks for brightening up my day!  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] 12:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
264148 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264147 +++$+++ 264147 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.182492420E09 +++$+++ Would you care to enlighten me who you are and why?  +++$+++ :Would you care to enlighten me who you are and why? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
264149 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264147 +++$+++ 264147 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.182492480E09 +++$+++ Ah, University of Cambridge. Says it all, really.  +++$+++ :Ah, University of Cambridge. Says it all, really. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
264150 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264147 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-22 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.182529260E09 +++$+++ Which produces such articulate and witty people, obviously.  +++$+++ :::Which produces such articulate and witty people, obviously. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

264151 +++$+++ Best username yet +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264151 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-22 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.182537300E09 +++$+++ But I think that calling it popular misconceptions might be a bit non-NPOV, as it's implicitly saying that the criticism is invalid, isn't it?  +++$+++ But I think that calling it popular misconceptions might be a bit non-NPOV, as it's implicitly saying that the criticism is invalid, isn't it? [[User:Best username yet|Best username yet]] 11:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
264152 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264151 +++$+++ 264151 +++$+++ 2007-06-22 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.182537360E09 +++$+++ Can you think of a better (serious) title?  +++$+++ :Can you think of a better (serious) title? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
264153 +++$+++ Best username yet +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264151 +++$+++ 264152 +++$+++ 2007-06-22 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.182537540E09 +++$+++ Criticism of Media Studies in the UK Media?  +++$+++ ::Criticism of Media Studies in the UK Media? [[User:Best username yet|Best username yet]] 11:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
264154 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264151 +++$+++ 264153 +++$+++ 2007-06-22 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.182537540E09 +++$+++ Go for it.  +++$+++ :::Go for it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

526298 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526298 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-30 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.159684500E09 +++$+++ I'm around now, if you still need something, but I'll likely be gone again soon for the rest of the evening.  +++$+++ I'm around now, if you still need something, but I'll likely be gone again soon for the rest of the evening. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 23:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
526299 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526298 +++$+++ 526298 +++$+++ 2006-09-30 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.159684620E09 +++$+++ Yeah, probably.  +++$+++ :Yeah, probably. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 23:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

264156 +++$+++ Fsecret +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264156 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-26 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.182914760E09 +++$+++ Hello. This article seems to have been deleted unilaterally even though more than one person voiced opposition to this action. I would like to point out again that the article in question is not about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content. It is notable because it is part of a [[list of anime and manga featuring omorashi]], and is of interest to readers of the [[omorashi]] article as an example of the media it describes. [[User:JayKeaton|JayKeaton]] also pointed out in the page's discussion that the article describes a work of [[manga]] that is in print and \"serves a use for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga|WikiProject Anime and manga]], the article Omorashi and it also serves to demonstrate Japanese culture for WikiProject Japan (which Omorashi itself is a part of).\" These are valid objections, I think. I would like to know why they were not responded to by the party\/parties in favor of deletion with discussion. Such discussion is the foundation of [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|Wikipedia etiquette.]]  +++$+++ Hello. This article seems to have been deleted unilaterally even though more than one person voiced opposition to this action. I would like to point out again that the article in question is not about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content. It is notable because it is part of a [[list of anime and manga featuring omorashi]], and is of interest to readers of the [[omorashi]] article as an example of the media it describes. [[User:JayKeaton|JayKeaton]] also pointed out in the page's discussion that the article describes a work of [[manga]] that is in print and "serves a use for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga|WikiProject Anime and manga]], the article Omorashi and it also serves to demonstrate Japanese culture for WikiProject Japan (which Omorashi itself is a part of)." These are valid objections, I think. I would like to know why they were not responded to by the party/parties in favor of deletion with discussion. Such discussion is the foundation of [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|Wikipedia etiquette.]] [[User:Fsecret|Fsecret]] 20:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
264157 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264156 +++$+++ 264156 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.182917460E09 +++$+++ Hello. I deleted it under A1: it contained incredibly little content. If the subject is of interest, then I'd advise actually writing an article.  +++$+++ :Hello. I deleted it under A1: it contained incredibly little content. If the subject is of interest, then I'd advise actually writing an article. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

2015 +++$+++ Quazgaa +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-05 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.278363660E09 +++$+++ Dude, I was Trying to Improve the PRican People article and you undid my rev [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Puerto_Rican_people&action=historysubmit&diff=371491198&oldid=371407744 here].  I was inserting proper sentencing and grammar.  The article is very informative but clearly has some grammar issues in the section I improved.  Please feel free to correct it yourself, otherwise I still don't see a reason to undo my revision.  Thanx!  +++$+++ Dude, I was Trying to Improve the PRican People article and you undid my rev [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Puerto_Rican_people&action=historysubmit&diff=371491198&oldid=371407744 here].  I was inserting proper sentencing and grammar.  The article is very informative but clearly has some grammar issues in the section I improved.  Please feel free to correct it yourself, otherwise I still don't see a reason to undo my revision.  Thanx! [[User:Quazgaa|Quazgaa]] ([[User talk:Quazgaa|talk]]) 14:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
2016 +++$+++ Quazgaa +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2015 +++$+++ 2015 +++$+++ 2010-07-05 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.278380400E09 +++$+++ Very Nice!  My motto is to leave articles a little better before leaving them.  Try to remember this before undoing some of the more constructive edits. BTW, Sorry for calling you [[Dude]].  My intention was not to insult but to bring some informality to my post.  I apologize if any feelings were hurt Mr.\/Ms.\/Mrs. XLR8TION.  Thanks again for the improvement to the article.  +++$+++ *Very Nice!  My motto is to leave articles a little better before leaving them.  Try to remember this before undoing some of the more constructive edits. BTW, Sorry for calling you [[Dude]].  My intention was not to insult but to bring some informality to my post.  I apologize if any feelings were hurt Mr./Ms./Mrs. XLR8TION.  Thanks again for the improvement to the article. [[User:Quazgaa|Quazgaa]] ([[User talk:Quazgaa|talk]]) 18:40, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

2017 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-20 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.279687500E09 +++$+++ Ever hear of [[Hugo Margenat]]? To tell you the truth, I'm ashamed to say that I never heard of him until I wrote about him.  +++$+++ Ever hear of [[Hugo Margenat]]? To tell you the truth, I'm ashamed to say that I never heard of him until I wrote about him. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 21:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
2018 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2017 +++$+++ 2017 +++$+++ 2010-07-20 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.279692300E09 +++$+++ The thing that amazes me about Margenat is that he died so young, 24 years old, with so much talent and so much to offer. Can you imagine all that he would have given the world if he lived to a ripe old age?  +++$+++ *The thing that amazes me about Margenat is that he died so young, 24 years old, with so much talent and so much to offer. Can you imagine all that he would have given the world if he lived to a ripe old age? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 23:05, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

526307 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526307 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-01 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.159743480E09 +++$+++ See 24.60.41.165 on WP:AIV, he needs quick blocking, vio multiple test4's.  +++$+++ See 24.60.41.165 on WP:AIV, he needs quick blocking, vio multiple test4's. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 15:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
526308 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526307 +++$+++ 526307 +++$+++ 2006-10-01 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.159743720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for blocking this guy and reverting my user page. He needs to be removed from the AIV list now.  +++$+++ :Thanks for blocking this guy and reverting my user page. He needs to be removed from the AIV list now. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 16:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

264164 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-30 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.183222740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Seraphim Whipp|Seraphim Whipp]] 09:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
264165 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264164 +++$+++ 264164 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.183655940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Seraphim Whipp|Seraphim Whipp]] 10:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
264166 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264164 +++$+++ 264165 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.183679580E09 +++$+++ Decreased protection level to 'established user only' the other day, actually. Removed altogether after your nudge. Within an hour it was vandalised. There are some psychos out there. I've returned to 'established users only'. I reckon some of my stalkers have accounts, as some seem to have a decent knowledge of policy\/code...  +++$+++ ::Decreased protection level to 'established user only' the other day, actually. Removed altogether after your nudge. Within an hour it was vandalised. There are some psychos out there. I've returned to 'established users only'. I reckon some of my stalkers have accounts, as some seem to have a decent knowledge of policy/code... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
264167 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264164 +++$+++ 264166 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.183679820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Seraphim Whipp|<font color="FF69B4">Seraphim</font>]] [[User_talk:Seraphim Whipp|<sup><font color="FF0000">Whipp</font></sup>]] 16:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

526310 +++$+++ Choess +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-03 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.159880580E09 +++$+++ \"William FitzAldelm De Burgh\" appears to be a genealogical confutation of William FitzAldelm, one of Henry II's officials, with [[William de Burgh]]. I've rewritten the article to be about the official and moved it to the proper name. As regards Burkem, a more permanent solution may be necessary, simply because he edits for about a day every month and then goes silent. I was considering filing an RfC when I saw this latest batch; might that provide sufficient basis for a longer block (which I'm afraid is the only thing that will get through to him at this point)?  +++$+++ "William FitzAldelm De Burgh" appears to be a genealogical confutation of William FitzAldelm, one of Henry II's officials, with [[William de Burgh]]. I've rewritten the article to be about the official and moved it to the proper name. As regards Burkem, a more permanent solution may be necessary, simply because he edits for about a day every month and then goes silent. I was considering filing an RfC when I saw this latest batch; might that provide sufficient basis for a longer block (which I'm afraid is the only thing that will get through to him at this point)? [[User:Choess|Choess]] 06:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
526311 +++$+++ Choess +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526310 +++$+++ 526310 +++$+++ 2006-10-03 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.159928520E09 +++$+++ He might have started stubs for some early Earls of Ulster we didn't have yet, so I don't think his contributions have been 100% fake. And the blocking has, in fact, gotten him to say something on his talk page. I've tried to engage him there on the unacceptability of the Charlemagne->William de Burgh part of the genealogy. That's enough progress that I'm content to be patient through another iteration or two of the usual.  +++$+++ :He might have started stubs for some early Earls of Ulster we didn't have yet, so I don't think his contributions have been 100% fake. And the blocking has, in fact, gotten him to say something on his talk page. I've tried to engage him there on the unacceptability of the Charlemagne->William de Burgh part of the genealogy. That's enough progress that I'm content to be patient through another iteration or two of the usual. [[User:Choess|Choess]] 19:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
526312 +++$+++ Choess +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526310 +++$+++ 526311 +++$+++ 2006-10-06 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.160135160E09 +++$+++ Oh dear. Well, we're making progress. Essentially, the ancestry of William de Burgh (d. 1204\/1205) is still *very* murky, despite various confident assertions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, so I've cut the genealogy off above there. I haven't checked the rest (and I confess I don't have a copy of The Complete Peerage easily to hand, so I'm to some degree forced to rely upon discussion in soc.genealogy.medieval, nevertheless a very reliable source, despite being Usenet), but there's nothing that looks obviously wrong about it, and I wouldn't ''expect'' the 1890 book he's working out of to get it wrong. (Genealogies like that are least to be trusted when trying to link the family of interest to some prestigious ancestor, but other than that are usually not bad). Anyway, the succession box on Charles the Younger looks like a misunderstanding, rather than pushing the particular piece of bad genealogy: Charles the Younger did have some regal authority during his lifetime as King of Neustria (not of the Franks), so he may deserve some sort of succession box. I'll have to look into it. The genealogy is quite ill-formatted, and he should probably be reminded that [[WP:ISNOT]] a genealogy site as such and pointed at http:\/\/www.wikitree.org\/ or something similar, but some of the material in the genealogies (Clanricarde, for instance) probably deserves incorporation into the encyclopedia, although maybe in different format.  +++$+++ ::Oh dear. Well, we're making progress. Essentially, the ancestry of William de Burgh (d. 1204/1205) is still *very* murky, despite various confident assertions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, so I've cut the genealogy off above there. I haven't checked the rest (and I confess I don't have a copy of The Complete Peerage easily to hand, so I'm to some degree forced to rely upon discussion in soc.genealogy.medieval, nevertheless a very reliable source, despite being Usenet), but there's nothing that looks obviously wrong about it, and I wouldn't ''expect'' the 1890 book he's working out of to get it wrong. (Genealogies like that are least to be trusted when trying to link the family of interest to some prestigious ancestor, but other than that are usually not bad). Anyway, the succession box on Charles the Younger looks like a misunderstanding, rather than pushing the particular piece of bad genealogy: Charles the Younger did have some regal authority during his lifetime as King of Neustria (not of the Franks), so he may deserve some sort of succession box. I'll have to look into it. The genealogy is quite ill-formatted, and he should probably be reminded that [[WP:ISNOT]] a genealogy site as such and pointed at http://www.wikitree.org/ or something similar, but some of the material in the genealogies (Clanricarde, for instance) probably deserves incorporation into the encyclopedia, although maybe in different format. [[User:Choess|Choess]] 04:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

2023 +++$+++ Quazgaa +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-05 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.283750580E09 +++$+++ FYI...A discussion you where involved in is currently under a vote for consensus [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:David_Zayas#Consensus here].  +++$+++ FYI...A discussion you where involved in is currently under a vote for consensus [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:David_Zayas#Consensus here]. [[User:Quazgaa|<span style="font-family: Jokerman;font-size:20px; line-height: 0.5em;">QuAz</span>]][[User talk:Quazgaa|<span style="font-family: Jokerman;font-size:20px; line-height: 0.5em">GaA</span>]] 22:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
2024 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2023 +++$+++ 2023 +++$+++ 2010-09-06 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.283828760E09 +++$+++ Luis, please vote in the consensus.  +++$+++ *Luis, please vote in the consensus. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 20:06, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

264169 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-03 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.183496880E09 +++$+++ If you are going to prod my pages, please finish them. I don't know what the point of prodding the original film and the second sequel, but leaving the first sequel and the third sequel, and the spin-off film was...but I've prodded them all for you.  +++$+++ If you are going to prod my pages, please finish them. I don't know what the point of prodding the original film and the second sequel, but leaving the first sequel and the third sequel, and the spin-off film was...but I've prodded them all for you. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 14:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
264170 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264169 +++$+++ 264169 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.183498140E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I used the first couple of [[WP:OWN|those]] Wikipedia pages as tests, rather than doing them all.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I used the first couple of [[WP:OWN|those]] Wikipedia pages as tests, rather than doing them all. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
264171 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264169 +++$+++ 264170 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.183503420E09 +++$+++ As a test for what? To see if I would be a hyprocite and challenge their deletion, because of their lack of notability? We're you hoping I'd say they were notable because they were films? lol. I created those pages long ago (by Wiki's standards of time), long before I had an understanding of many things, and there are other pages I worked on when I first came here that were horrible edits to articles. I have no problem if they are proded. I don't have the time or resources to fix them, and apparently neither does anyone else. Huge copy vios, in my opinion.  +++$+++ ::As a test for what? To see if I would be a hyprocite and challenge their deletion, because of their lack of notability? We're you hoping I'd say they were notable because they were films? lol. I created those pages long ago (by Wiki's standards of time), long before I had an understanding of many things, and there are other pages I worked on when I first came here that were horrible edits to articles. I have no problem if they are proded. I don't have the time or resources to fix them, and apparently neither does anyone else. Huge copy vios, in my opinion. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 15:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
264172 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264169 +++$+++ 264169 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.183568700E09 +++$+++ The other major problem with the images is that you were systematically placing them on article pages incorrectly. The images were huge, which devalued the page significantly. It is possible to reduce the size, but it's normally professional to check your success before moving on. If we do restore your images, or you add further, please ensure that your contributions adhere to our style guidelines. Thanks.  +++$+++ :The other major problem with the images is that you were systematically placing them on article pages incorrectly. The images were huge, which devalued the page significantly. It is possible to reduce the size, but it's normally professional to check your success before moving on. If we do restore your images, or you add further, please ensure that your contributions adhere to our style guidelines. Thanks. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
264173 +++$+++ Dave101 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264169 +++$+++ 264172 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.183574580E09 +++$+++ Per [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission]], a notice on the website is not needed, a simple email to info@dragonphoto.co.uk would be the simplest option. I feel this would have been the better option rather than removing the images. <u><font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ ::Per [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission]], a notice on the website is not needed, a simple email to info@dragonphoto.co.uk would be the simplest option. I feel this would have been the better option rather than removing the images. <u><font color="black">[[User:Dave101|Dave101]]</font></u><small>→<font color="AE1C28">[[User talk:Dave101|''talk'']]</font></small>&nbsp; 11:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
264174 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264169 +++$+++ 264173 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.183574760E09 +++$+++ Possibly a better solution, yes, but we get so many copyright violations that I tend to be quite strict. As you seem to be charitably donating the images (as opposed to Wikipedia requesting them), then it was up to your company to follow the 'Donotating' advice.  +++$+++ :::Possibly a better solution, yes, but we get so many copyright violations that I tend to be quite strict. As you seem to be charitably donating the images (as opposed to Wikipedia requesting them), then it was up to your company to follow the 'Donotating' advice. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
264175 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264169 +++$+++ 264169 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.183851000E09 +++$+++ Typing in capitals is equivalent to shouting and is deemed [[WP:CIVIL|incivil]]. Please follow the instructions at Donating Images, as per my advice several days ago. I will not enter into email correspondence.  +++$+++ :Typing in capitals is equivalent to shouting and is deemed [[WP:CIVIL|incivil]]. Please follow the instructions at Donating Images, as per my advice several days ago. I will not enter into email correspondence. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

526314 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-03 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.159923660E09 +++$+++ I want to thank you for the copyediting that you've done.  Could you look over the \"Vietnam War\" section and see if it need anything done?  Another request, could you see what can be done with the \"Military installations section in Puerto Rico\"  I don't know but (someone else added it a lnog time ago) it has always seemed like it could be improved.  Thanks  +++$+++ I want to thank you for the copyediting that you've done.  Could you look over the "Vietnam War" section and see if it need anything done?  Another request, could you see what can be done with the "Military installations section in Puerto Rico"  I don't know but (someone else added it a lnog time ago) it has always seemed like it could be improved.  Thanks [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 18:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
526315 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526314 +++$+++ 526314 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.159951380E09 +++$+++ I think that someone already bumped that section from the article. which is fine with me.   +++$+++ :I think that someone already bumped that section from the article. which is fine with me.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:43, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

2027 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-18 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.287387360E09 +++$+++ Luis my brother, some people are asking that you stick to the rules and add reliable verifiable sources whenever you add a name to the list. You know how it is. Take care.  +++$+++ Luis my brother, some people are asking that you stick to the rules and add reliable verifiable sources whenever you add a name to the list. You know how it is. Take care. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 00:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
2028 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2027 +++$+++ 2027 +++$+++ 2010-10-18 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.287398940E09 +++$+++ Not to worry. Luis, I have come up with a new concept for our articles. I thought that it would be great to allow our readers to have some interactive relation with the articles and I started the \"Audio\" sections. I placed it in the [[Flags of Puerto Rico]] for starters and many more. I mean, I bet there are a lot of people who would like to hear [[Pedro Albizu Campos]] making a speech or [[Antonio Paoli]] sing an opera. Plus how fascinating it is to view the actual newsreel of the [[Puerto Rican Nationalist Party Revolts of the 1950s]] or to watch [[Wilfredo Gomez]] in a fight? So, tell me how do you like my idea?  +++$+++ *Not to worry. Luis, I have come up with a new concept for our articles. I thought that it would be great to allow our readers to have some interactive relation with the articles and I started the "Audio" sections. I placed it in the [[Flags of Puerto Rico]] for starters and many more. I mean, I bet there are a lot of people who would like to hear [[Pedro Albizu Campos]] making a speech or [[Antonio Paoli]] sing an opera. Plus how fascinating it is to view the actual newsreel of the [[Puerto Rican Nationalist Party Revolts of the 1950s]] or to watch [[Wilfredo Gomez]] in a fight? So, tell me how do you like my idea? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 03:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

393554 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310448000E09 +++$+++ Hi, When you're back and recovered from your travels, please could you check {{Tl|ARKive}} to make sure I haven't done anything daft? Cheers. <span class=\"vcard\"><span class=\"fn\"> +++$+++ Hi, When you're back and recovered from your travels, please could you check {{Tl|ARKive}} to make sure I haven't done anything daft? Cheers. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (User:<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Andy's talk]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 22:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
393555 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393554 +++$+++ 393554 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311562380E09 +++$+++ Looks perfectly functional.  +++$+++ : Looks perfectly functional. [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 19:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

526319 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526319 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-08 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.160335860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the award! I was just trying to help out.  +++$+++ Thanks for the award! I was just trying to help out. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 12:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
526320 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526319 +++$+++ 526319 +++$+++ 2006-10-08 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.160335980E09 +++$+++ And you did indeed! &mdash;  +++$+++ : And you did indeed! &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 12:33, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

264177 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.183576320E09 +++$+++ <p>Problem articles should be dealt with using the existing PROD policy. My problem is with the review system. It gives more power to a particular group of people. They have created the guidelines (OK, based on an interpretation of an existing established guideline), and a process by which they will enforce it. This really seems at odds with one of the pillars of the project. (BTW, I will be away of a couple of days from now...)  +++$+++ <p>Problem articles should be dealt with using the existing PROD policy. My problem is with the review system. It gives more power to a particular group of people. They have created the guidelines (OK, based on an interpretation of an existing established guideline), and a process by which they will enforce it. This really seems at odds with one of the pillars of the project. (BTW, I will be away of a couple of days from now...) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
264178 +++$+++ Matthew +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264177 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.183577280E09 +++$+++ I totally agree with you on the notability issue (people don't seem to realise writers, directors, critical reception are real world information). I also agree with you about PROD, and if an editor objects to a proposed deletion then AfD would be the next venue. It's apparent to me that these users want the articles deleted, but have to settle for a redirect (really though, a redirect is just a cheap way of saying the history is preserved, but the article is gone).  +++$+++ ::I totally agree with you on the notability issue (people don't seem to realise writers, directors, critical reception are real world information). I also agree with you about PROD, and if an editor objects to a proposed deletion then AfD would be the next venue. It's apparent to me that these users want the articles deleted, but have to settle for a redirect (really though, a redirect is just a cheap way of saying the history is preserved, but the article is gone). [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 12:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

2035 +++$+++ Mercy11 +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-19 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.295507040E09 +++$+++ Hi. The edits you made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Puerto_Rican_people&action=historysubmit&diff=408839299&oldid=407081489 HERE] all appear to be from either self-published (www.stewartsynopsis.com) or otherwise non-[[WP:RS|RS]] such as blog commentaries (http:\/\/www.topix.com) and commercial sites (http:\/\/boricua.com). Also, the link for citation RE: 2010 census figures did not lead me to a page where the figures entered could be verified (also you may have overlooked updating the accessdate for the link as the accessdate entered on the day of the edits (Jan 19, 2011) is listed not as Jan 19, 2011 but as March 12, 2010). Could you review your edits [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Puerto_Rican_people&action=historysubmit&diff=408839299&oldid=407081489 THERE] to ensure they in fact reflect what you intended, and that the sources are all reliable. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. The edits you made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Puerto_Rican_people&action=historysubmit&diff=408839299&oldid=407081489 HERE] all appear to be from either self-published (www.stewartsynopsis.com) or otherwise non-[[WP:RS|RS]] such as blog commentaries (http://www.topix.com) and commercial sites (http://boricua.com). Also, the link for citation RE: 2010 census figures did not lead me to a page where the figures entered could be verified (also you may have overlooked updating the accessdate for the link as the accessdate entered on the day of the edits (Jan 19, 2011) is listed not as Jan 19, 2011 but as March 12, 2010). Could you review your edits [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Puerto_Rican_people&action=historysubmit&diff=408839299&oldid=407081489 THERE] to ensure they in fact reflect what you intended, and that the sources are all reliable. Thanks. [[User:Mercy11|Mercy11]] ([[User talk:Mercy11|talk]]) 23:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
2036 +++$+++ Mercy11 +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2035 +++$+++ 2035 +++$+++ 2011-01-23 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.295788140E09 +++$+++ Yes I agree the article is being vandalised. Also [[Demographics of Puerto Rico]] has experienced similar vandalism. Another editor suspected a sockpuppet as shown [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Puerto_Rican_people&action=historysubmit&diff=409054414&oldid=409041061 HERE] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:DDatGuy1 HERE] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:24.189.27.194&oldid=408860341 HERE] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:AFROdr HERE]. Probably a good candidate for protecting an article would be if vandalism is occuring by several\/many different people on ONE same article. If the same ONE user, on teh other hand, vandalises one or more article then the appropriate action would be blocking the user. That's my view. For now, let's wait and see what happens next. In my experience vandalisers eventually become victims of their own actions: either get tired of it, lose interest and leave, or realize that it's too many good editors against him\/her and stop vandalism, lose interest and leave, or simply want to be disruptive for a while (maybe some sort of mental ailments I suppose) and, after drawing some attention, lose interest and leave. But they almost always leave before producing any real, permanent damage. Thanks for your note, and again I think either protection or a block would be in order soon. Regards,  +++$+++ : Yes I agree the article is being vandalised. Also [[Demographics of Puerto Rico]] has experienced similar vandalism. Another editor suspected a sockpuppet as shown [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Puerto_Rican_people&action=historysubmit&diff=409054414&oldid=409041061 HERE] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DDatGuy1 HERE] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.189.27.194&oldid=408860341 HERE] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AFROdr HERE]. Probably a good candidate for protecting an article would be if vandalism is occuring by several/many different people on ONE same article. If the same ONE user, on teh other hand, vandalises one or more article then the appropriate action would be blocking the user. That's my view. For now, let's wait and see what happens next. In my experience vandalisers eventually become victims of their own actions: either get tired of it, lose interest and leave, or realize that it's too many good editors against him/her and stop vandalism, lose interest and leave, or simply want to be disruptive for a while (maybe some sort of mental ailments I suppose) and, after drawing some attention, lose interest and leave. But they almost always leave before producing any real, permanent damage. Thanks for your note, and again I think either protection or a block would be in order soon. Regards, [[User:Mercy11|Mercy11]] ([[User talk:Mercy11|talk]]) 05:09, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

612009 +++$+++ 200.209.169.81 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612009 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-16 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.187249700E09 +++$+++ There was some information that you erased doing that. -  +++$+++ There was some information that you erased doing that. - [[User:200.209.169.81|200.209.169.81]] 00:35, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
612010 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612009 +++$+++ 612009 +++$+++ 2007-08-16 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.187250060E09 +++$+++ May I ask what you're refering to? I've been busy with several things today, a Bleach \"project\" for Wikipedia being one of them, and I can't recall any edits you might be talking about. \/\/  +++$+++ :May I ask what you're refering to? I've been busy with several things today, a Bleach "project" for Wikipedia being one of them, and I can't recall any edits you might be talking about. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 00:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

393556 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-18 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311041280E09 +++$+++ You and Pigs on the wing may be interested in this development.\u2666  +++$+++ You and Pigs on the wing may be interested in this development.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 19:08, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
393557 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393556 +++$+++ 393556 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311562380E09 +++$+++ Interesting.  +++$+++ : Interesting. [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 19:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

568319 +++$+++ Eagle 101 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568319 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-12 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.147493880E09 +++$+++ Ok, so you have successfully logged in?? +++$+++ Ok, so you have successfully logged in??[[user:Eagle 101|Eagle]]  [[user_talk:Eagle 101|talk]] 21:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
568320 +++$+++ Eagle 101 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568319 +++$+++ 568319 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.147493880E09 +++$+++ the other problems you are having I will get to in a moment. (has to do with cookies, but one thing at a time!!!) +++$+++ : the other problems you are having I will get to in a moment. (has to do with cookies, but one thing at a time!!!)[[user:Eagle 101|Eagle]]  [[user_talk:Eagle 101|talk]] 21:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
568321 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568319 +++$+++ 568320 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.147494000E09 +++$+++ Yes, I have successfully logged in, it just took some time to do so! This may be the cookie problem to which you refer. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ ::Yes, I have successfully logged in, it just took some time to do so! This may be the cookie problem to which you refer. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 21:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
568322 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568319 +++$+++ 568321 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.147494420E09 +++$+++ What browser do you use to edit Wikipedia?  +++$+++ :::What browser do you use to edit Wikipedia? [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 21:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
568323 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568319 +++$+++ 568322 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.147494540E09 +++$+++ I normally use Firefox but I notice that VandalProof uses IE. Is this significant with relation to cookies? <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ ::::I normally use Firefox but I notice that VandalProof uses IE. Is this significant with relation to cookies? <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 21:29, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

2046 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-14 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.308117960E09 +++$+++ If John Leguizamo does not publicly respond by June 18th to the acusations that his father made that he (the father) is 100% Colombian and not Puerto Rican as John has always claimed, therefore making John Leguizamo a full Colombian and not a half Puerto Rican, Leguizamo's name will taken off the list. This would mean that John Leguizamo has been lying tothe Puerto Rican people for years as did Sammy Davis Jr.  +++$+++ If John Leguizamo does not publicly respond by June 18th to the acusations that his father made that he (the father) is 100% Colombian and not Puerto Rican as John has always claimed, therefore making John Leguizamo a full Colombian and not a half Puerto Rican, Leguizamo's name will taken off the list. This would mean that John Leguizamo has been lying tothe Puerto Rican people for years as did Sammy Davis Jr. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 23:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
2047 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ XLR8TION +++$+++ 2046 +++$+++ 2046 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.308182760E09 +++$+++ This is a tough and embarssing situation. His father is not Puerto Rican as he claimed with his lies, Leguizamo's parents are both Colombian therefore he does not have one once of Puerto Rican blood; and he has never resided in Puerto Rico. The fact that he is not Puerto Rican will be deleted from his bio and there is nothing that we can do. He my \"feel\" Puerto Rican, but to be a Puerto Rican and to \"feel\" Puerto Rican are two different things. I can accept the fact if he comes public and sets the record straight. For example if Leguizamo faced the situation and said something like this \"I may not be a Puerto Rican by heritage, but I consider myself Puerto Rican and I'm proud of it\" then that would be aceptable, but up until today, he hasn't been man enough to publically face the situation. Don't get me wrong, I like the guy and even felt proud that he was Puerto Rican, but unless he comes public and tells the world exactly what he feels, I personally feel that he has lied and cheated us all.  +++$+++ *This is a tough and embarssing situation. His father is not Puerto Rican as he claimed with his lies, Leguizamo's parents are both Colombian therefore he does not have one once of Puerto Rican blood; and he has never resided in Puerto Rico. The fact that he is not Puerto Rican will be deleted from his bio and there is nothing that we can do. He my "feel" Puerto Rican, but to be a Puerto Rican and to "feel" Puerto Rican are two different things. I can accept the fact if he comes public and sets the record straight. For example if Leguizamo faced the situation and said something like this "I may not be a Puerto Rican by heritage, but I consider myself Puerto Rican and I'm proud of it" then that would be aceptable, but up until today, he hasn't been man enough to publically face the situation. Don't get me wrong, I like the guy and even felt proud that he was Puerto Rican, but unless he comes public and tells the world exactly what he feels, I personally feel that he has lied and cheated us all. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 17:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

2050 +++$+++ Kasper2006 +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-01 08:15:00 +++$+++ 1.228148100E09 +++$+++ Ok tnx, maybe I'll add something about the name in the main article. -- +++$+++ Ok tnx, maybe I'll add something about the name in the main article. --[[User:Kasper2006|Kasper2006]] ([[User talk:Kasper2006|talk]]) 08:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
2051 +++$+++ WacoJacko +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2050 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.237118460E09 +++$+++ Ok, I will take your word for that, you seem to know have a better knowledge than me in this area. I did not realize it had to be a theatre built within those dates. I guess, I was misunderstanding the actual definition of a palace theatre. Thanks for taking the time to explain it.'''<em style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS Italic\"><font color=\"#8B0000\"> +++$+++ ::: Ok, I will take your word for that, you seem to know have a better knowledge than me in this area. I did not realize it had to be a theatre built within those dates. I guess, I was misunderstanding the actual definition of a palace theatre. Thanks for taking the time to explain it.'''<em style="font-family:Trebuchet MS Italic"><font color="#8B0000">[[User:WacoJacko|Wacko]]</font><font color="Grey">[[User talk:WacoJacko|Jack]]</font><font color="#D2B48C">[[Special:Contributions/WacoJacko|<strong>O</strong>]]</font></em>''' 05:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

612011 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-17 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.187336340E09 +++$+++ I guess [[Template:Infobox VG Hidden]] might be helpful on some of the combined series articles to help stop some of the complaints, and give more information if you feel like using it.  +++$+++ I guess [[Template:Infobox VG Hidden]] might be helpful on some of the combined series articles to help stop some of the complaints, and give more information if you feel like using it. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 00:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
612012 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612011 +++$+++ 612011 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.187391000E09 +++$+++ Wow, I never knew we had something like that for video games. I'll go see how it looks on the series pages and just hope it'll stick. \/\/  +++$+++ :Wow, I never knew we had something like that for video games. I'll go see how it looks on the series pages and just hope it'll stick. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 15:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

2052 +++$+++ THD3 +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2052 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-18 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.237397700E09 +++$+++ I've reinstated the anecdote on the Toscanini page.  It was in one of Harvey Sachs' books.  I've listed a citation request and will add the reference when I get home. +++$+++ I've reinstated the anecdote on the Toscanini page.  It was in one of Harvey Sachs' books.  I've listed a citation request and will add the reference when I get home.[[User:THD3|THD3]] ([[User talk:THD3|talk]]) 10:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
2053 +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2052 +++$+++ 2052 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.237466640E09 +++$+++ Great!  +++$+++ :Great! [[User:Markhh|Markhh]] ([[User talk:Markhh#top|talk]]) 05:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

393558 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311565980E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:WhatLinksHere\/Template:Convert_to_Infobox_Settlement See it uses]\u2666  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Convert_to_Infobox_Settlement See it uses]♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 20:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
393559 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393558 +++$+++ 393558 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.311567120E09 +++$+++ Yes, I figured that out already :)  +++$+++ : Yes, I figured that out already :) [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 21:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
393560 +++$+++ WOSlinker +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393558 +++$+++ 393559 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311571500E09 +++$+++ There's also articles that could do with in infobox conversion as well. About half on this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Search&ns0=1&redirs=0&search=class+infobox+vcard&limit=250&offset=0 list] are Greek settlements with hardcoded infoboxes. --  +++$+++ ::There's also articles that could do with in infobox conversion as well. About half on this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&ns0=1&redirs=0&search=class+infobox+vcard&limit=250&offset=0 list] are Greek settlements with hardcoded infoboxes. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 22:25, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
393561 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393558 +++$+++ 393560 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.311977460E09 +++$+++ Yes, I am afraid this is only the tip of the iceberg.  Many many articles out there are not even setting the \"infobox class\", and are using even more primitive tables for infoboxes.   +++$+++ ::: Yes, I am afraid this is only the tip of the iceberg.  Many many articles out there are not even setting the "infobox class", and are using even more primitive tables for infoboxes.  [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 15:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

2054 +++$+++ Kleinzach +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-24 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.237908360E09 +++$+++ Hi. I see you are also working on the discographies, which is great. My understanding is that we are not using the Amazon ASIN numbers on WP, because they are commercial and we are not supporting any particular retailer. Is that your understanding? Best. --'' +++$+++ Hi. I see you are also working on the discographies, which is great. My understanding is that we are not using the Amazon ASIN numbers on WP, because they are commercial and we are not supporting any particular retailer. Is that your understanding? Best. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 08:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
2055 +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2054 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 06:15:00 +++$+++ 1.237986900E09 +++$+++ Yes that is my understanding and I don't use them, but previous editors have posted them. Mostly I have focused on the Tosca page so far. But when I get a chance to expand some of the other pages I'll replace the Amazon mumbers with catalog numbers when I can.  +++$+++ ::Yes that is my understanding and I don't use them, but previous editors have posted them. Mostly I have focused on the Tosca page so far. But when I get a chance to expand some of the other pages I'll replace the Amazon mumbers with catalog numbers when I can. [[User:Markhh|Markhh]] ([[User talk:Markhh#top|talk]]) 06:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2056 +++$+++ Kleinzach +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2054 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 07:48:00 +++$+++ 1.237992480E09 +++$+++ Thanks. --'' +++$+++ :::Thanks. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 07:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

264199 +++$+++ Edito*Magica +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-09 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.184044860E09 +++$+++ All information I have incorperated into [[five's image]] is from reliable sources.  +++$+++ All information I have incorperated into [[five's image]] is from reliable sources. [[User:Edito*Magica|Edito*Magica]] 22:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
264200 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264199 +++$+++ 264199 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.184045340E09 +++$+++ Could you please specify what these reliable sources are at the appropriate points in the article.  +++$+++ :Could you please specify what these reliable sources are at the appropriate points in the article. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

584914 +++$+++ Endlessdan +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-18 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.203393960E09 +++$+++ Sure. What does this entail? Will it be a new fancy button or will I have to download something? --[[User talk:Endlessdan|Endless]]  +++$+++ Sure. What does this entail? Will it be a new fancy button or will I have to download something? --[[User talk:Endlessdan|Endless]] [[User talk:Endlessdan|Dan]] 20:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
584915 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584914 +++$+++ 584914 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.203394140E09 +++$+++ Just a fancy new button, nothing to download! I just pressed a button, and now you have rollback! All that's been changed is the rights of your account: you do not need to download anything. For information on rollback, you may want to see [[Wikipedia:New admin school\/Rollback]] and [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature]]. Good luck!  +++$+++ :Just a fancy new button, nothing to download! I just pressed a button, and now you have rollback! All that's been changed is the rights of your account: you do not need to download anything. For information on rollback, you may want to see [[Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback]] and [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature]]. Good luck! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
584916 +++$+++ Endlessdan +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584914 +++$+++ 584915 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.203394440E09 +++$+++ I beat ya to the punch. I found those guides and just did my first test roll back on my user page. Very interesting and most useful. Thank you! --[[User talk:Endlessdan|Endless]]  +++$+++ :: I beat ya to the punch. I found those guides and just did my first test roll back on my user page. Very interesting and most useful. Thank you! --[[User talk:Endlessdan|Endless]] [[User talk:Endlessdan|Dan]] 20:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
584917 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584914 +++$+++ 584916 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.203394500E09 +++$+++ You're welcome!  +++$+++ :::You're welcome! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

2057 +++$+++ Infrogmation +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-27 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.238199960E09 +++$+++ Hi. NEVER try to \"move\" a page by copy and pasting what other people wrote to another title. That messes up article history, and removes the required attribution of who wrote what. What to do then if you think something should be at another title?  See [[Help:Moving a page]]. Hope this helps. --  +++$+++ Hi. NEVER try to "move" a page by copy and pasting what other people wrote to another title. That messes up article history, and removes the required attribution of who wrote what. What to do then if you think something should be at another title?  See [[Help:Moving a page]]. Hope this helps. -- [[User:Infrogmation|Infrogmation]] ([[User talk:Infrogmation|talk]]) 17:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
2058 +++$+++ Infrogmation +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2057 +++$+++ 2057 +++$+++ 2009-03-27 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.238201940E09 +++$+++ Hi. It looks like you're familiar with the \"move page\" function and have used it in the past-- good!  But you also sometimes did \"copy and paste\" pseudo moves-- not good!  Please be sure to use the \"move page\" function consistantly when moving an article-- especially any article that contains any text or work by someone other than yourself.  I undid your moves of the Saenger Theatre articles for New Orleans and Pensacola. You may be correct that another title would be better; I undid simply to clean up\/restore article history, per Wikipedia policy.  See the comment I left at [[Talk:New Orleans Saenger Theatre]].  Thanks for your work. If you have questions about Wikipedia policies and practices you can't find an answer for, ask. Cheers, --  +++$+++ * Hi. It looks like you're familiar with the "move page" function and have used it in the past-- good!  But you also sometimes did "copy and paste" pseudo moves-- not good!  Please be sure to use the "move page" function consistantly when moving an article-- especially any article that contains any text or work by someone other than yourself.  I undid your moves of the Saenger Theatre articles for New Orleans and Pensacola. You may be correct that another title would be better; I undid simply to clean up/restore article history, per Wikipedia policy.  See the comment I left at [[Talk:New Orleans Saenger Theatre]].  Thanks for your work. If you have questions about Wikipedia policies and practices you can't find an answer for, ask. Cheers, -- [[User:Infrogmation|Infrogmation]] ([[User talk:Infrogmation|talk]]) 17:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
2059 +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2057 +++$+++ 2057 +++$+++ 2009-03-28 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.238242140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help. Sorry for the screw up.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your help. Sorry for the screw up. [[User:Markhh|Markhh]] ([[User talk:Markhh#top|talk]]) 05:09, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

2061 +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-25 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.243304820E09 +++$+++ Not officially, although I have known it as a friend and volunteer since its inception.  +++$+++ Not officially, although I have known it as a friend and volunteer since its inception. [[User:Markhh|Markhh]] ([[User talk:Markhh#top|talk]]) 19:27, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
2062 +++$+++ RadioFan +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2061 +++$+++ 2061 +++$+++ 2009-05-25 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.243305720E09 +++$+++ This still sounds like a bit of a conflict of interest to me.  I'm going to place some information below on COI, This can be cleared up likely by following it's instructions to declare your connection with the organization.-- +++$+++ :This still sounds like a bit of a conflict of interest to me.  I'm going to place some information below on COI, This can be cleared up likely by following it's instructions to declare your connection with the organization.--[[User:RadioFan|RadioFan]] ([[User talk:RadioFan|talk]]) 19:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

612013 +++$+++ Sephiroth BCR +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-17 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.187352660E09 +++$+++ Sorry for not responding quickly, I've been busy on my college tour. Making similar lists for those articles is fine. As for character lists for the single games, it becomes more game guide information than showing the transition between games in a series. The only mention that I would include is that they are based on the ''Bleach''\/''Dragon Ball''\/''Naruto''\/whatever series and leave it at that. For series, you can include out-of-universe sources concerning inclusion or exclusion of certain characters and so on and such forth. In any case, have you thought of a solution for separating single games? <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Sorry for not responding quickly, I've been busy on my college tour. Making similar lists for those articles is fine. As for character lists for the single games, it becomes more game guide information than showing the transition between games in a series. The only mention that I would include is that they are based on the ''Bleach''/''Dragon Ball''/''Naruto''/whatever series and leave it at that. For series, you can include out-of-universe sources concerning inclusion or exclusion of certain characters and so on and such forth. In any case, have you thought of a solution for separating single games? <font face="Verdana">[[User:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="navy">'''Sephiroth BCR'''</font>]] <sup>'''([[User talk:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="blue">Converse</font>]])'''</sup></font> 05:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
612014 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612013 +++$+++ 612013 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.187391000E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about it; we had a pretty bad storm last night that didn't die down until maybe four or five in the morning and I had to take an early break (somewhere between 7:30 to 8 at night). At any rate, I'll avoid adding character lists and focus more on encyclopedic information. For the single games, however... I haven't come up with anything. But I'll keep looking around for ideas and hopefully we can finally get all these articles to GA. \/\/  +++$+++ :Don't worry about it; we had a pretty bad storm last night that didn't die down until maybe four or five in the morning and I had to take an early break (somewhere between 7:30 to 8 at night). At any rate, I'll avoid adding character lists and focus more on encyclopedic information. For the single games, however... I haven't come up with anything. But I'll keep looking around for ideas and hopefully we can finally get all these articles to GA. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 15:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

264208 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264208 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-22 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.185091980E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page. [[User:NHRHS2010|<font color="red" face="papyrus">'''NHRHS2010'''</font>]][[User talk:NHRHS2010|<sup><small><font color= "black">''' Talk '''</font></small></sup>]] 01:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
264209 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264208 +++$+++ 264208 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 10:25:00 +++$+++ 1.185211500E09 +++$+++ OK. There are many grammatical errors made in speech, and I'm not convinced that this is such a big enough issue to point out with [sic]. The place would be littered with [sic] if we included it after everyone's [[Lynne Truss|Trussian]] pet peeve. We should really restrict sic for factual errors. (I've seen sic used for gender political reasons too.)  +++$+++ :OK. There are many grammatical errors made in speech, and I'm not convinced that this is such a big enough issue to point out with [sic]. The place would be littered with [sic] if we included it after everyone's [[Lynne Truss|Trussian]] pet peeve. We should really restrict sic for factual errors. (I've seen sic used for gender political reasons too.) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:25, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

264210 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks in advance17:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ Thanks in advance17:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
264211 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264210 +++$+++ 264210 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.185900540E09 +++$+++ I know what you mean about arguing with kiddies. It's the school holidays so you're going to get loads of arguments over pop culture articles. Think of them with the contempt they deserve and let them get stressed, not you. Personally I'm not putting as much time into the project now, and some articles are lacking some major development as a result.  +++$+++ :I know what you mean about arguing with kiddies. It's the school holidays so you're going to get loads of arguments over pop culture articles. Think of them with the contempt they deserve and let them get stressed, not you. Personally I'm not putting as much time into the project now, and some articles are lacking some major development as a result. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

264212 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264212 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-24 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.185330060E09 +++$+++ Please look at the merge discussion linked in one of my summaries. You may find the article acceptable, but the Simpsons project is merging minor characters like that.  +++$+++ Please look at the merge discussion linked in one of my summaries. You may find the article acceptable, but the Simpsons project is merging minor characters like that. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 19:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
264213 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264212 +++$+++ 264212 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.185346140E09 +++$+++ As I have mentioned before, you really should be holding the views of Wikipedia (signified by [[WP:N]], [[WP:V]], and [[WP:RS]] in this case) far above your own. In the very least, you should try to change the guidelines instead of messing around with a few articles here and there.  +++$+++ :As I have mentioned before, you really should be holding the views of Wikipedia (signified by [[WP:N]], [[WP:V]], and [[WP:RS]] in this case) far above your own. In the very least, you should try to change the guidelines instead of messing around with a few articles here and there. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 23:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
264214 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264212 +++$+++ 264212 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.185900360E09 +++$+++ Well, Wikipedia is not a [[WP:CRYSTAL|crystal ball]], nor is it a news site. I'd support removing the entire section, or condensing it into one short paragraph.  +++$+++ :Well, Wikipedia is not a [[WP:CRYSTAL|crystal ball]], nor is it a news site. I'd support removing the entire section, or condensing it into one short paragraph. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
264215 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264212 +++$+++ 264212 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.185944040E09 +++$+++ Ah, I didn't spot that. Thanks for clearing it up.  +++$+++ :Ah, I didn't spot that. Thanks for clearing it up. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
264216 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264212 +++$+++ 264215 +++$+++ 2007-08-05 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.186340880E09 +++$+++ Just want to bump up this comment, just incase you didn't see it in the first place. <span style=\"font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ ::Just want to bump up this comment, just incase you didn't see it in the first place. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;">[[User:Dalejenkins|Dalejenkins]] | <small>[[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Apprentice (UK)|The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say!]]</small></span> 12:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

526357 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-31 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.162295580E09 +++$+++ Hey, you know what?  The office of U.S. Congressman [[Jose Serrano]] got in touch with me.  I think that they may name a street of [[Carlos Lozada]] and that they would like me to be persent.  But, the assistent is not sure and I'm supposed to call him tomorrow.  If I do I'll fill you in.   +++$+++ Hey, you know what?  The office of U.S. Congressman [[Jose Serrano]] got in touch with me.  I think that they may name a street of [[Carlos Lozada]] and that they would like me to be persent.  But, the assistent is not sure and I'm supposed to call him tomorrow.  If I do I'll fill you in.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
526358 +++$+++ ScreaminEagle +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526357 +++$+++ 526357 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.162507620E09 +++$+++ Me, always with the piggy-backing onto other people's comments.  I couldn't find out what he was awarded 2 Silver Stars for, so I called his startled son and asked him.  He said he would have to ask his family and get back to me, but at least that would be a starting point for you, all personal research aside.  Once we have the information, it might be easier to hunt down published sources for it.  He also asked if we'd contacted the Naval Academy and asked them and I thought that I had read that someone planned on doing that, but did that ever come to fruition?  -- +++$+++ :Me, always with the piggy-backing onto other people's comments.  I couldn't find out what he was awarded 2 Silver Stars for, so I called his startled son and asked him.  He said he would have to ask his family and get back to me, but at least that would be a starting point for you, all personal research aside.  Once we have the information, it might be easier to hunt down published sources for it.  He also asked if we'd contacted the Naval Academy and asked them and I thought that I had read that someone planned on doing that, but did that ever come to fruition?  --[[User:ScreaminEagle|ScreaminEagle]] 14:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

2070 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-24 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.253794140E09 +++$+++ Article talk pages exist solely to discuss improvements to articles. Discussion of the topics themselves are off-topic, such as this one.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Jockstrap&curid=1256467&diff=315855892&oldid=315849634] For more information, see [[WP:TALK#Others' comments]]: \"Some examples of appropriately editing others' comments:... Deleting material not relevant to improving the article...\" &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ Article talk pages exist solely to discuss improvements to articles. Discussion of the topics themselves are off-topic, such as this one.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jockstrap&curid=1256467&diff=315855892&oldid=315849634] For more information, see [[WP:TALK#Others' comments]]: "Some examples of appropriately editing others' comments:... Deleting material not relevant to improving the article..." &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 05:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
2071 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2070 +++$+++ 2070 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.253806680E09 +++$+++ There are so many policies, guidelines, and essays, and they change so frequently, that no one knows them all. It's embarassing when I quote such a page only to find it's changed since I looked at it. Anyway, just a minot point. Cheers. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :There are so many policies, guidelines, and essays, and they change so frequently, that no one knows them all. It's embarassing when I quote such a page only to find it's changed since I looked at it. Anyway, just a minot point. Cheers. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 08:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

264217 +++$+++ Dark Kubrick +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-01 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.186027140E09 +++$+++ You've been doing a great job of working on and taking care of ''Jaws'', and I was impressed by your work on the sequels' pages. Thanks for reading this and all the great work you've done.-- +++$+++ You've been doing a great job of working on and taking care of ''Jaws'', and I was impressed by your work on the sequels' pages. Thanks for reading this and all the great work you've done.--[[User:Dark Kubrick|Dark Kubrick]] 20:59, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
264218 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264217 +++$+++ 264217 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.186506840E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I'm not ignoring you -- just been busy and away. I'll take a look at it. Don't get too obsessed with badges: they're just little badges, after all that no-one outside of the 'community' cares about. If you think that the FA you've worked on is better than the LotR, then take comfort in that. A FAR review might be an unfruitful exercise: our existence on this earth might be better spent elsewhere than the amateur politics of Wikipedia, especially for something as fighting over a badge.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I'm not ignoring you -- just been busy and away. I'll take a look at it. Don't get too obsessed with badges: they're just little badges, after all that no-one outside of the 'community' cares about. If you think that the FA you've worked on is better than the LotR, then take comfort in that. A FAR review might be an unfruitful exercise: our existence on this earth might be better spent elsewhere than the amateur politics of Wikipedia, especially for something as fighting over a badge. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
264219 +++$+++ Dark Kubrick +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264217 +++$+++ 264218 +++$+++ 2007-08-08 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.186639860E09 +++$+++ No problem. Actually, I've [[Wikipedia:featured article review\/The Lord of the Rings (1978 film)|already nominated it for FAR]]; guess I just couldn't wait. I appreciate your advice; my view of Wikipedia has definitely changed from before.-- +++$+++ ::No problem. Actually, I've [[Wikipedia:featured article review/The Lord of the Rings (1978 film)|already nominated it for FAR]]; guess I just couldn't wait. I appreciate your advice; my view of Wikipedia has definitely changed from before.--[[User:Dark Kubrick|Dark Kubrick]] 23:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

612015 +++$+++ Kyuubi29 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-17 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.187382780E09 +++$+++ My computer has been hacked by someone that i think is from 4 of these websites that i go to. could you please find out who it is and tell me. +++$+++ My computer has been hacked by someone that i think is from 4 of these websites that i go to. could you please find out who it is and tell me.[[User:Kyuubi29|Kyuubi29]] 13:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
612016 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612015 +++$+++ 612015 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.187391000E09 +++$+++ I'm not the right person to go to for such a thing. I've had no experience in this field, and the only advice I can give is to change your password and report this incident either to an administrator or bring it to the [[WP:VP|village pump]]. \/\/  +++$+++ :I'm not the right person to go to for such a thing. I've had no experience in this field, and the only advice I can give is to change your password and report this incident either to an administrator or bring it to the [[WP:VP|village pump]]. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 15:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

526364 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.163131140E09 +++$+++ I was wondering if you could at the article of [[Enectali Figueroa]] and fix any flaws which I may have overlooked.  Thanks  +++$+++ I was wondering if you could at the article of [[Enectali Figueroa]] and fix any flaws which I may have overlooked.  Thanks [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 19:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
526365 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526364 +++$+++ 526364 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.163212860E09 +++$+++ You know those are good questions that you asked about being an astronuat candidate, so what I did was write to Figueroa and ask him.  I also wanted an update because I want to know what happened after his 2003 interview.  I'll let you know as soon as I receive a response.   +++$+++ :You know those are good questions that you asked about being an astronuat candidate, so what I did was write to Figueroa and ask him.  I also wanted an update because I want to know what happened after his 2003 interview.  I'll let you know as soon as I receive a response.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 18:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

393562 +++$+++ TheVirginiaHistorian +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393562 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311066060E09 +++$+++ Is there a rationale for the big white boxes? I was trying to make the page look like a webpage.  +++$+++ Is there a rationale for the big white boxes? I was trying to make the page look like a webpage. [[User:TheVirginiaHistorian|TheVirginiaHistorian]] ([[User talk:TheVirginiaHistorian|talk]]) 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
393563 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393562 +++$+++ 393562 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311562380E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you can be more specific about what you are trying to accomplish, and I can help improve the layout.  I tried something to keep one of the images from overlapping the infobox, but it didn't work as intended, so I reverted it.  I agree that the formating is suboptimal on that page.  +++$+++ : Perhaps you can be more specific about what you are trying to accomplish, and I can help improve the layout.  I tried something to keep one of the images from overlapping the infobox, but it didn't work as intended, so I reverted it.  I agree that the formating is suboptimal on that page. [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 19:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
393564 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393562 +++$+++ 393562 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311562380E09 +++$+++ No, I don't live there.  +++$+++ : No, I don't live there. [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 19:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

2078 +++$+++ Michael Bednarek +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2078 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-10 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.276163880E09 +++$+++ Regarding {{Querylink|Metropolitan Opera|qs=&curid=216641&diff=367110036&oldid=366190873|your revert}} at [[Metropolitan Opera]]: please consider [[WP:REPEATLINK]], especially the first bullet point: \"where a later occurrence of an item is a long way from the first.\" I suggest you revert your revert. --  +++$+++ Regarding {{Querylink|Metropolitan Opera|qs=&curid=216641&diff=367110036&oldid=366190873|your revert}} at [[Metropolitan Opera]]: please consider [[WP:REPEATLINK]], especially the first bullet point: "where a later occurrence of an item is a long way from the first." I suggest you revert your revert. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 02:58, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
2079 +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2078 +++$+++ 2078 +++$+++ 2010-06-12 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.276386840E09 +++$+++ Done! Thanks for your comment.  +++$+++ :Done! Thanks for your comment. [[User:Markhh|Markhh]] ([[User talk:Markhh#top|talk]]) 16:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

526367 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.163367360E09 +++$+++ [[User:Wonton2ton]] moved [[Bhumibol Adulyadej]] to [[Bhumibol Adulyadej, the Great]]. This is an FA. I undid it and left this on his talk page (basically): \"You can't just rename an article. You have to put in a move request and get it approved. Discussion and consensus needs to take place. Also, Your new name for this article does not follow wiki naming conventions, ie, leave off \"the great\".\" Is this enough or does another action need to take place here? Bhumibol Adulyadej is the king of Thailand and I helped get it to FA. My wife is Thai.  +++$+++ [[User:Wonton2ton]] moved [[Bhumibol Adulyadej]] to [[Bhumibol Adulyadej, the Great]]. This is an FA. I undid it and left this on his talk page (basically): "You can't just rename an article. You have to put in a move request and get it approved. Discussion and consensus needs to take place. Also, Your new name for this article does not follow wiki naming conventions, ie, leave off "the great"." Is this enough or does another action need to take place here? Bhumibol Adulyadej is the king of Thailand and I helped get it to FA. My wife is Thai. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 13:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
526368 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526367 +++$+++ 526367 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.163372880E09 +++$+++ I would put a note on the article talk page, but I fear it'd just inflame the Thai royalty fanatics and start a round of article renaming. We had a lot of trouble getting it to FA because of editors who abhor any criticism, even if neutral in tone, of the King. Let's just see where this goes, hopefully just die away. Wiki policy is to use real names for royals without titles such as the great. The English peerage naming system is really confusing--I've even seen native Brits not agree on how it should be done-;) +++$+++ :I would put a note on the article talk page, but I fear it'd just inflame the Thai royalty fanatics and start a round of article renaming. We had a lot of trouble getting it to FA because of editors who abhor any criticism, even if neutral in tone, of the King. Let's just see where this goes, hopefully just die away. Wiki policy is to use real names for royals without titles such as the great. The English peerage naming system is really confusing--I've even seen native Brits not agree on how it should be done-;)[[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 15:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
526369 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526367 +++$+++ 526368 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.163375340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the background info.  Good points. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the background info.  Good points. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 15:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
526370 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526367 +++$+++ 526367 +++$+++ 2006-11-13 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.163428200E09 +++$+++ See your talk page.  Joe has responded to your query on the above companies.  I've also left some info. &mdash;  +++$+++ : See your talk page.  Joe has responded to your query on the above companies.  I've also left some info. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 06:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
526371 +++$+++ Jog1973 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526367 +++$+++ 526367 +++$+++ 2006-11-13 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.163429220E09 +++$+++ Please review [[Movaya Wireless]] now  +++$+++ : Please review [[Movaya Wireless]] now [[User:Jog1973|Jog1973]] 06:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

2080 +++$+++ 4meter4 +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2080 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-28 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.277776980E09 +++$+++ Hey Mark. I think some articles wikified to the [[NBC Orchestra]] are in fact supposed to go to the NBCSO. You might want to check the \"what links here\". Cheers. +++$+++ Hey Mark. I think some articles wikified to the [[NBC Orchestra]] are in fact supposed to go to the NBCSO. You might want to check the "what links here". Cheers.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 19:03, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
2081 +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2080 +++$+++ 2080 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.277779860E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I checked all of the links. Most of them were correct, but I made changes where necessary. There was an in-house orchestra at NBC prior to and separate from the NBCSO with some members belonging to both. There seems to be no one name for this. Sometimes its referred to as the NBC Orchestra, sometimes the NBC staff orchestra, and the NBC house orchestra. NBC also had a West Coast studio with its own in-house band, to add to the confusion. But for sure, most references to the \"NBC Orchestra\" are about the Tonight Show Band. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks! I checked all of the links. Most of them were correct, but I made changes where necessary. There was an in-house orchestra at NBC prior to and separate from the NBCSO with some members belonging to both. There seems to be no one name for this. Sometimes its referred to as the NBC Orchestra, sometimes the NBC staff orchestra, and the NBC house orchestra. NBC also had a West Coast studio with its own in-house band, to add to the confusion. But for sure, most references to the "NBC Orchestra" are about the Tonight Show Band. Cheers, [[User:Markhh|Markhh]] ([[User talk:Markhh#top|talk]]) 19:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
2082 +++$+++ 4meter4 +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2080 +++$+++ 2081 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.277780220E09 +++$+++ Thanks Mark for taking the time to fix things where needed. +++$+++ ::Thanks Mark for taking the time to fix things where needed.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 19:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
2083 +++$+++ 4meter4 +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2080 +++$+++ 2082 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.277781000E09 +++$+++ That is interesting. I never heard that story before. +++$+++ :::That is interesting. I never heard that story before.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 20:10, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

264226 +++$+++ Skatewalk +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-14 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.187124120E09 +++$+++ I believe in the originality of history and respecting other cultures, look at my edits. I never delete any work. I disagree with imposing Arabizing non Arabs. And ancient Arabia doesnt have anything to do with modern political Arabism!-- +++$+++ I believe in the originality of history and respecting other cultures, look at my edits. I never delete any work. I disagree with imposing Arabizing non Arabs. And ancient Arabia doesnt have anything to do with modern political Arabism!--[[User:Skatewalk|Skatewalk]] 13:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
264227 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264226 +++$+++ 264226 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.187143800E09 +++$+++ I must admit, I prefer simply 'Episodes'. The 'Guide' is probably redundant anyway.  +++$+++ :I must admit, I prefer simply 'Episodes'. The 'Guide' is probably redundant anyway. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:10, 14 August 2007(UTC)

2084 +++$+++ Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-26 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.280146620E09 +++$+++ Can you help disambiguate the two [[Boston Opera House]] into [[Boston Opera House (1909)]] and [[Boston Opera House (1980)]]. -- +++$+++ Can you help disambiguate the two [[Boston Opera House]] into [[Boston Opera House (1909)]] and [[Boston Opera House (1980)]]. --[[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] ([[User talk:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|talk]]) 05:17, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
2085 +++$+++ Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2084 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-26 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.280147220E09 +++$+++ Yes, excellent changes. It seems most of the articles link to the earlier incarnation. -- +++$+++ :::Yes, excellent changes. It seems most of the articles link to the earlier incarnation. --[[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] ([[User talk:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|talk]]) 05:27, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

264229 +++$+++ Skatewalk +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264229 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-15 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.187228340E09 +++$+++ The article was vandalized and merged to the wrong section, we couldn't restore it because it was protected. Can you please make sure the article is protected from further vandalism by [[User:EliasAlucard]] or his very close editing partner friend [[User:Dbachmann]]. -- +++$+++ The article was vandalized and merged to the wrong section, we couldn't restore it because it was protected. Can you please make sure the article is protected from further vandalism by [[User:EliasAlucard]] or his very close editing partner friend [[User:Dbachmann]]. --[[User:Skatewalk|Skatewalk]] 18:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
264230 +++$+++ Skatewalk +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264229 +++$+++ 264229 +++$+++ 2007-08-15 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.187240160E09 +++$+++ The article has 21 references and sources supporting it. Al you offered is an impressive reverting effort!-- +++$+++ *The article has 21 references and sources supporting it. Al you offered is an impressive reverting effort!--[[User:Skatewalk|Skatewalk]] 21:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
264231 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264229 +++$+++ 264230 +++$+++ 2007-08-15 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.187242680E09 +++$+++ This page should be protected by the way untill we all finish the discussions.  +++$+++ ::This page should be protected by the way untill we all finish the discussions. [[User:Ammar_shaker|<font face="Mistral" size="5" color="black">Ammar</font>]] (<sup>[[User_talk:Ammar_shaker|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]</sup> - <sup>[[Don't Talk|<font color="red">Don't Talk</font>]]</sup>) 22:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

2086 +++$+++ Art LaPella +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2086 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-07 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.281178140E09 +++$+++ Referring to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tosca&diff=377589905&oldid=377588854 this edit], [[WP:NBSP]] specifies \"12 November\" as an example of text that needs an &amp;nbsp; or a Nowrap template. [[User:Art LaPella\/AWB explanation#Nowrap and nbsp|More explanation here]].  +++$+++ Referring to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tosca&diff=377589905&oldid=377588854 this edit], [[WP:NBSP]] specifies "12 November" as an example of text that needs an &amp;nbsp; or a Nowrap template. [[User:Art LaPella/AWB explanation#Nowrap and nbsp|More explanation here]]. [[User:Art LaPella|Art LaPella]] ([[User talk:Art LaPella|talk]]) 03:49, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
2087 +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2086 +++$+++ 2086 +++$+++ 2010-08-07 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.281178680E09 +++$+++ Okay. Got it.  +++$+++ :Okay. Got it. [[User:Markhh|Markhh]] ([[User talk:Markhh#top|talk]]) 03:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

264232 +++$+++ Best username yet +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-22 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.182537300E09 +++$+++ But I think that calling it popular misconceptions might be a bit non-NPOV, as it's implicitly saying that the criticism is invalid, isn't it?  +++$+++ But I think that calling it popular misconceptions might be a bit non-NPOV, as it's implicitly saying that the criticism is invalid, isn't it? [[User:Best username yet|Best username yet]] 11:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
264233 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264232 +++$+++ 264232 +++$+++ 2007-06-22 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.182537360E09 +++$+++ Can you think of a better (serious) title?  +++$+++ :Can you think of a better (serious) title? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
264234 +++$+++ Best username yet +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264232 +++$+++ 264233 +++$+++ 2007-06-22 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.182537540E09 +++$+++ Criticism of Media Studies in the UK Media?  +++$+++ ::Criticism of Media Studies in the UK Media? [[User:Best username yet|Best username yet]] 11:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
264235 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264232 +++$+++ 264234 +++$+++ 2007-06-22 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.182537540E09 +++$+++ Go for it.  +++$+++ :::Go for it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

262492 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-31 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.301574300E09 +++$+++ Returned to re-read [[Horses in World War I]] and was pleased to see it ended up featured. In case you haven't been following it, I wanted to let you know that things have moved on quite a bit as regards the statement that the 'War Horse' book ''\"may be adapted into a screenplay\"''. Indeed, we now have an article on the film: [[War Horse (film)]]. I should note it on the talk page, but thought I'd drop you a note first (I know I could add it myself), but I'm in a  bit of a rush. Maybe you could get the article on the front page when the film comes out?  +++$+++ Returned to re-read [[Horses in World War I]] and was pleased to see it ended up featured. In case you haven't been following it, I wanted to let you know that things have moved on quite a bit as regards the statement that the 'War Horse' book ''"may be adapted into a screenplay"''. Indeed, we now have an article on the film: [[War Horse (film)]]. I should note it on the talk page, but thought I'd drop you a note first (I know I could add it myself), but I'm in a  bit of a rush. Maybe you could get the article on the front page when the film comes out? [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 05:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
262493 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262492 +++$+++ 262492 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.301616660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note. I've updated the article, but please feel free to tweak as necessary.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the note. I've updated the article, but please feel free to tweak as necessary. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 17:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

2090 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-03 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.296759660E09 +++$+++ Hi - I spent some time trying to find who added the Pelletier recording that you expunged from the article but gave up.  However, Operadis comes up with the goods [http:\/\/www.operadis-opera-discography.org.uk\/CLPUBOHE.HTM#15 here] and I think you'll agree that it isn't a hoax (unlike the recent spurious additions to ''[[Don Giovanni]]'', [[Faust discography]] etc. which have been plaguing us recently).  SE indicates that the recording is of excerpts and was made in a studio rather than at a performance at the Met. I restored the recording and have added a ref and more detail. Best. --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ Hi - I spent some time trying to find who added the Pelletier recording that you expunged from the article but gave up.  However, Operadis comes up with the goods [http://www.operadis-opera-discography.org.uk/CLPUBOHE.HTM#15 here] and I think you'll agree that it isn't a hoax (unlike the recent spurious additions to ''[[Don Giovanni]]'', [[Faust discography]] etc. which have been plaguing us recently).  SE indicates that the recording is of excerpts and was made in a studio rather than at a performance at the Met. I restored the recording and have added a ref and more detail. Best. --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 11:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
2091 +++$+++ Voceditenore +++$+++ Markhh +++$+++ 2090 +++$+++ 2090 +++$+++ 2011-02-05 06:54:00 +++$+++ 1.296917640E09 +++$+++ See my comment [[User_talk:GuillaumeTell#La_boh.C3.A8me_-_in_French.3F|here]]. Best,  +++$+++ :See my comment [[User_talk:GuillaumeTell#La_boh.C3.A8me_-_in_French.3F|here]]. Best, [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 06:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

113547 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Jesse Viviano +++$+++ 113547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-21 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.279774860E09 +++$+++ This articles seems to match my understanding of AH and ESP; ie, that AH and ESP can both be used in transport mode but only ESP in tunneling mode. But, the article doesn't explicitly state that. Is my understanding of this correct? If so, one of us can edit the article to explicitly state that. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ This articles seems to match my understanding of AH and ESP; ie, that AH and ESP can both be used in transport mode but only ESP in tunneling mode. But, the article doesn't explicitly state that. Is my understanding of this correct? If so, one of us can edit the article to explicitly state that. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 22:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
113548 +++$+++ Jesse Viviano +++$+++ Jesse Viviano +++$+++ 113547 +++$+++ 113547 +++$+++ 2010-07-21 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.279780020E09 +++$+++ I think that I can come up with a counterexample. For example, Alice is in a US branch office of a company. Her computer needs to send a packet to Bob's computer in India. However, corporate policy requires that VPN endpoints must authenticate each other strongly and prove each others' IP address. Therefore, the VPN could be set up to use AH in tunneling mode to carry an ESP packet in tunneling mode, whose contents are the the packet that Alice sent. The rationale is that AH has strong enough header authentication that something that changes the IP address like NAT will cause AH to report an authentication error. ESP's integrity check only proves that the computer which created the packet was the one in the SA, but it does not check the IP address. This allows ESP to pass through NAT, but this means that future attacks that require changing the IP address will go undetected. Therefore, your hypothesis is wrong. AH can be used in tunneling mode to provide the IP-address sensitive header authentication possible to a packet encrypted with ESP if that is important.  +++$+++ :I think that I can come up with a counterexample. For example, Alice is in a US branch office of a company. Her computer needs to send a packet to Bob's computer in India. However, corporate policy requires that VPN endpoints must authenticate each other strongly and prove each others' IP address. Therefore, the VPN could be set up to use AH in tunneling mode to carry an ESP packet in tunneling mode, whose contents are the the packet that Alice sent. The rationale is that AH has strong enough header authentication that something that changes the IP address like NAT will cause AH to report an authentication error. ESP's integrity check only proves that the computer which created the packet was the one in the SA, but it does not check the IP address. This allows ESP to pass through NAT, but this means that future attacks that require changing the IP address will go undetected. Therefore, your hypothesis is wrong. AH can be used in tunneling mode to provide the IP-address sensitive header authentication possible to a packet encrypted with ESP if that is important. [[User:Jesse Viviano|Jesse Viviano]] ([[User talk:Jesse Viviano#top|talk]]) 23:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
113549 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Jesse Viviano +++$+++ 113547 +++$+++ 113548 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.279783140E09 +++$+++ Hmm. Interesting. Can you put that into [[IPsec]] in article-speak? Some very educated people are telling my AH can't be used in tunnel mode. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::Hmm. Interesting. Can you put that into [[IPsec]] in article-speak? Some very educated people are telling my AH can't be used in tunnel mode. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 00:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
113550 +++$+++ Jesse Viviano +++$+++ Jesse Viviano +++$+++ 113547 +++$+++ 113549 +++$+++ 2010-07-23 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.279914240E09 +++$+++ I cannot do that now, because I have too much to do in real life now.  +++$+++ :::I cannot do that now, because I have too much to do in real life now. [[User:Jesse Viviano|Jesse Viviano]] ([[User talk:Jesse Viviano#top|talk]]) 12:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

264237 +++$+++ Fsecret +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-26 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.182914760E09 +++$+++ Hello. This article seems to have been deleted unilaterally even though more than one person voiced opposition to this action. I would like to point out again that the article in question is not about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content. It is notable because it is part of a [[list of anime and manga featuring omorashi]], and is of interest to readers of the [[omorashi]] article as an example of the media it describes. [[User:JayKeaton|JayKeaton]] also pointed out in the page's discussion that the article describes a work of [[manga]] that is in print and \"serves a use for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga|WikiProject Anime and manga]], the article Omorashi and it also serves to demonstrate Japanese culture for WikiProject Japan (which Omorashi itself is a part of).\" These are valid objections, I think. I would like to know why they were not responded to by the party\/parties in favor of deletion with discussion. Such discussion is the foundation of [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|Wikipedia etiquette.]]  +++$+++ Hello. This article seems to have been deleted unilaterally even though more than one person voiced opposition to this action. I would like to point out again that the article in question is not about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content. It is notable because it is part of a [[list of anime and manga featuring omorashi]], and is of interest to readers of the [[omorashi]] article as an example of the media it describes. [[User:JayKeaton|JayKeaton]] also pointed out in the page's discussion that the article describes a work of [[manga]] that is in print and "serves a use for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga|WikiProject Anime and manga]], the article Omorashi and it also serves to demonstrate Japanese culture for WikiProject Japan (which Omorashi itself is a part of)." These are valid objections, I think. I would like to know why they were not responded to by the party/parties in favor of deletion with discussion. Such discussion is the foundation of [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|Wikipedia etiquette.]] [[User:Fsecret|Fsecret]] 20:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
264238 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264237 +++$+++ 264237 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.182917460E09 +++$+++ Hello. I deleted it under A1: it contained incredibly little content. If the subject is of interest, then I'd advise actually writing an article.  +++$+++ :Hello. I deleted it under A1: it contained incredibly little content. If the subject is of interest, then I'd advise actually writing an article. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

393565 +++$+++ Bulwersator +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393565 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.311371400E09 +++$+++ You may be interested in [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Astronomy#multiple_infoboxes_for_impact_craters|this discussion]]  +++$+++ You may be interested in [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Astronomy#multiple_infoboxes_for_impact_craters|this discussion]] [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 14:50, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
393566 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393565 +++$+++ 393565 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311562380E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I will have a look if I can find some time.  +++$+++ : Thanks.  I will have a look if I can find some time. [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 19:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

264240 +++$+++ HoneyBee +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-27 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.182994260E09 +++$+++ Hi, how are ya? Could you spare one minute of your time to check out [[Reservoir Dogs]] please? I looked at it, and it's kinda mess. Maybe you could advice or something. Thanks :)  +++$+++ Hi, how are ya? Could you spare one minute of your time to check out [[Reservoir Dogs]] please? I looked at it, and it's kinda mess. Maybe you could advice or something. Thanks :) [[User:HoneyBee|HoneyBee]] 18:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
264241 +++$+++ HoneyBee +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264240 +++$+++ 264240 +++$+++ 2007-06-30 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.183227420E09 +++$+++ I just edited\/updated a huge amount of Reservoir article. I dunno whether this is the correct format. What do you think? +++$+++ : I just edited/updated a huge amount of Reservoir article. I dunno whether this is the correct format. What do you think?[[User:HoneyBee|HoneyBee]] 11:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

526385 +++$+++ Nareek +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526385 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-22 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.164188400E09 +++$+++ [[User:75.3.122.60]] just blanked the [[List of Backyardigans episodes]].  +++$+++ [[User:75.3.122.60]] just blanked the [[List of Backyardigans episodes]]. [[User:Nareek|Nareek]] 01:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
526386 +++$+++ Nareek +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526385 +++$+++ 526385 +++$+++ 2006-11-22 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.164189660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the block.  Generally when I see that an administrator has taken an interest in a particular vandal, I go to them to report further vandalism.  Would it be better if I went through the official channels?  +++$+++ :Thanks for the block.  Generally when I see that an administrator has taken an interest in a particular vandal, I go to them to report further vandalism.  Would it be better if I went through the official channels? [[User:Nareek|Nareek]] 02:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

2098 +++$+++ Slrubenstein +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-06 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.215377520E09 +++$+++ Then again, you may be better off not knowing.  I am the last one here to tell you our business.  Still, I am glad to see you back, appreciate your message on my page, and hope to see more of you around,  +++$+++ Then again, you may be better off not knowing.  I am the last one here to tell you our business.  Still, I am glad to see you back, appreciate your message on my page, and hope to see more of you around, [[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]]   |  [[User talk:Slrubenstein|Talk]] 13:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
2099 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2098 +++$+++ 2098 +++$+++ 2008-07-07 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.215417060E09 +++$+++ Slrubenstein, could you please stop calling Jagz a troll?  Yes he's a blocked editor, but it's still a personal attack. Jagz's edits may have been disruptive, tendentious, or even just plain ol' stubborn.  That still doesn't make him a troll.  See [[WP:TROLL]], and please try to find a different word to use. -- +++$+++ : Slrubenstein, could you please stop calling Jagz a troll?  Yes he's a blocked editor, but it's still a personal attack. Jagz's edits may have been disruptive, tendentious, or even just plain ol' stubborn.  That still doesn't make him a troll.  See [[WP:TROLL]], and please try to find a different word to use. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 00:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

526388 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-19 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.163989440E09 +++$+++ OrphanBot applied an incorrect tag to an image. See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image:David_M_Brahms_-_USMC_-_retired.jpg&direction=next&oldid=48355887] &mdash; the image had tag {{tl|PD-USGov-Military-Marines}} already on it; the bot tagged it with {{tl|no copyright holder|month=November|day=19|year=2006}}.  Why is the bot misidentifying licensed images? &mdash;  +++$+++ OrphanBot applied an incorrect tag to an image. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:David_M_Brahms_-_USMC_-_retired.jpg&direction=next&oldid=48355887] &mdash; the image had tag {{tl|PD-USGov-Military-Marines}} already on it; the bot tagged it with {{tl|no copyright holder|month=November|day=19|year=2006}}.  Why is the bot misidentifying licensed images? &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 18:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
526389 +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526388 +++$+++ 526388 +++$+++ 2006-11-19 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.164002760E09 +++$+++ The image has only the simple assertion that it is in the public domain.  It needs source information so that it's possible for this to be verified. -- +++$+++ :The image has only the simple assertion that it is in the public domain.  It needs source information so that it's possible for this to be verified. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] 22:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
526390 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526388 +++$+++ 526389 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.164291540E09 +++$+++ Actually, the {{tl|PD-USGov-Military-Marines}} tag indicates that the source is the Marine Corps. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::Actually, the {{tl|PD-USGov-Military-Marines}} tag indicates that the source is the Marine Corps. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 06:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

264245 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-30 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.183222740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Seraphim Whipp|Seraphim Whipp]] 09:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
264246 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264245 +++$+++ 264245 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.183655940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Seraphim Whipp|Seraphim Whipp]] 10:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
264247 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264245 +++$+++ 264246 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.183679580E09 +++$+++ Decreased protection level to 'established user only' the other day, actually. Removed altogether after your nudge. Within an hour it was vandalised. There are some psychos out there. I've returned to 'established users only'. I reckon some of my stalkers have accounts, as some seem to have a decent knowledge of policy\/code...  +++$+++ ::Decreased protection level to 'established user only' the other day, actually. Removed altogether after your nudge. Within an hour it was vandalised. There are some psychos out there. I've returned to 'established users only'. I reckon some of my stalkers have accounts, as some seem to have a decent knowledge of policy/code... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
264248 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264245 +++$+++ 264247 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.183679820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Seraphim Whipp|<font color="FF69B4">Seraphim</font>]] [[User_talk:Seraphim Whipp|<sup><font color="FF0000">Whipp</font></sup>]] 16:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

568329 +++$+++ Tjss +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568329 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-13 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.147504800E09 +++$+++ You're the first admin on the list, so I'll ask you about this.  [[User:Roulette36]] has a user page that is racist and offensive.  It consists of a single sentence: \"Mexicans are dirty.\"  I have advised him that this does not conform to wikipedia policy.  If he does not change it, or changes it back, can you please block him or advise me of who I should ask for further action.  Thanks.  -- +++$+++ You're the first admin on the list, so I'll ask you about this.  [[User:Roulette36]] has a user page that is racist and offensive.  It consists of a single sentence: "Mexicans are dirty."  I have advised him that this does not conform to wikipedia policy.  If he does not change it, or changes it back, can you please block him or advise me of who I should ask for further action.  Thanks.  --[[User:Tjss|Tjss]] 00:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
568330 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568329 +++$+++ 568329 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.147524420E09 +++$+++ Hello! I see that you have already blanked the offending comment from the user-in-questions' page.  [[Wikipedia:User_page#What_can_I_not_have_on_my_user_page.3F]] shows  that polemical comments should be avoided & [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]] stress that attacks on third parties should be avoided and that good Wikipedians remove them on sight. If the offending remarks are replaced, the user can be warned with the various policies pointed out.  If they persist then a block request can be made to an administrator with the repeat offence evidence as a demonstration of the requirement. Regards, <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :Hello! I see that you have already blanked the offending comment from the user-in-questions' page.  [[Wikipedia:User_page#What_can_I_not_have_on_my_user_page.3F]] shows  that polemical comments should be avoided & [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]] stress that attacks on third parties should be avoided and that good Wikipedians remove them on sight. If the offending remarks are replaced, the user can be warned with the various policies pointed out.  If they persist then a block request can be made to an administrator with the repeat offence evidence as a demonstration of the requirement. Regards, <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 05:47, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
568331 +++$+++ Tjss +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568329 +++$+++ 568330 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.147525020E09 +++$+++ In that case, I would like to officially request that [[User:Roulette36]] be blocked.  After reviewing his [[Special:Contributions\/Roulette36|contribs]], he appears to have thirteen instances of vandalism since 12 February 2006, most of them including racist remarks, especially towards African Americans.  I note that on his [[User_talk:Roulette36|talk page]], he has been warned three times by different users that his actions constitute vandalism, and was threatened with blockage on Feb 13.  This user shows nothing but indifference to wikipedia policy and general sensitivity.  -- +++$+++ ::In that case, I would like to officially request that [[User:Roulette36]] be blocked.  After reviewing his [[Special:Contributions/Roulette36|contribs]], he appears to have thirteen instances of vandalism since 12 February 2006, most of them including racist remarks, especially towards African Americans.  I note that on his [[User_talk:Roulette36|talk page]], he has been warned three times by different users that his actions constitute vandalism, and was threatened with blockage on Feb 13.  This user shows nothing but indifference to wikipedia policy and general sensitivity.  --[[User:Tjss|Tjss]] 05:57, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
568332 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568329 +++$+++ 568329 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.147526520E09 +++$+++ I have left a message on [[User:Roulette36|Roulette36's]] userpage to say that his next vandal effort will be his last.  The user appears to edit infrequently on Wikipedia, so I prefer to give them a chance of redemption rather than to block ''in absentia''. Regards, <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :I have left a message on [[User:Roulette36|Roulette36's]] userpage to say that his next vandal effort will be his last.  The user appears to edit infrequently on Wikipedia, so I prefer to give them a chance of redemption rather than to block ''in absentia''. Regards, <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 06:22, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
568333 +++$+++ Tjss +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568329 +++$+++ 568332 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.147554720E09 +++$+++ Sounds good.  Thank you.  -- +++$+++ ::Sounds good.  Thank you.  --[[User:Tjss|Tjss]] 14:12, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

2104 +++$+++ Electrical Experiment +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-07 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.215491520E09 +++$+++ Can you move [[Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal\/Futurebird\/sister]] to a sub-page of your user page per [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:2008_main_page_redesign_proposal#Suggestion_.282.29 this]. <span style=\"font-family:Gill Sans MT\"> +++$+++ Can you move [[Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal/Futurebird/sister]] to a sub-page of your user page per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:2008_main_page_redesign_proposal#Suggestion_.282.29 this]. <span style="font-family:Gill Sans MT">[[User:Electrical Experiment|'''<span style="background:Black;color:gold">E</span>''']][[User talk:Electrical Experiment|'''<span style="background:Black;color:gold">E'''</span>]]</span> 21:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
2105 +++$+++ Electrical Experiment +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2104 +++$+++ 2104 +++$+++ 2008-07-07 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.215495540E09 +++$+++ then request to delete it with {{tn|db-author}}. <span style=\"font-family:Gill Sans MT\"> +++$+++ :then request to delete it with {{tn|db-author}}. <span style="font-family:Gill Sans MT">[[User:Electrical Experiment|'''<span style="background:Black;color:gold">E</span>''']][[User talk:Electrical Experiment|'''<span style="background:Black;color:gold">E'''</span>]]</span> 22:39, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
2106 +++$+++ Electrical Experiment +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2104 +++$+++ 2105 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.215516240E09 +++$+++ thankyou +++$+++ ::thankyou[[User:Electrical Experiment|Electrical Experiment]] ([[User talk:Electrical Experiment|talk]]) 04:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

526393 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-24 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.164416160E09 +++$+++ Cheers!  +++$+++ Cheers! [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 16:56, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
526394 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526393 +++$+++ 526393 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.164454200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your work on the Gonzales article.  I just finished  an article on MoH [[Philip Bazaar]].  I did the best that I could with the little info. that there is about him.  +++$+++ *Thanks for your work on the Gonzales article.  I just finished  an article on MoH [[Philip Bazaar]].  I did the best that I could with the little info. that there is about him. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

264250 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-03 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.183496880E09 +++$+++ If you are going to prod my pages, please finish them. I don't know what the point of prodding the original film and the second sequel, but leaving the first sequel and the third sequel, and the spin-off film was...but I've prodded them all for you.  +++$+++ If you are going to prod my pages, please finish them. I don't know what the point of prodding the original film and the second sequel, but leaving the first sequel and the third sequel, and the spin-off film was...but I've prodded them all for you. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 14:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
264251 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264250 +++$+++ 264250 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.183498140E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I used the first couple of [[WP:OWN|those]] Wikipedia pages as tests, rather than doing them all.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I used the first couple of [[WP:OWN|those]] Wikipedia pages as tests, rather than doing them all. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
264252 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264250 +++$+++ 264251 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.183503420E09 +++$+++ As a test for what? To see if I would be a hyprocite and challenge their deletion, because of their lack of notability? We're you hoping I'd say they were notable because they were films? lol. I created those pages long ago (by Wiki's standards of time), long before I had an understanding of many things, and there are other pages I worked on when I first came here that were horrible edits to articles. I have no problem if they are proded. I don't have the time or resources to fix them, and apparently neither does anyone else. Huge copy vios, in my opinion.  +++$+++ ::As a test for what? To see if I would be a hyprocite and challenge their deletion, because of their lack of notability? We're you hoping I'd say they were notable because they were films? lol. I created those pages long ago (by Wiki's standards of time), long before I had an understanding of many things, and there are other pages I worked on when I first came here that were horrible edits to articles. I have no problem if they are proded. I don't have the time or resources to fix them, and apparently neither does anyone else. Huge copy vios, in my opinion. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 15:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
264253 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264250 +++$+++ 264250 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.183568700E09 +++$+++ The other major problem with the images is that you were systematically placing them on article pages incorrectly. The images were huge, which devalued the page significantly. It is possible to reduce the size, but it's normally professional to check your success before moving on. If we do restore your images, or you add further, please ensure that your contributions adhere to our style guidelines. Thanks.  +++$+++ :The other major problem with the images is that you were systematically placing them on article pages incorrectly. The images were huge, which devalued the page significantly. It is possible to reduce the size, but it's normally professional to check your success before moving on. If we do restore your images, or you add further, please ensure that your contributions adhere to our style guidelines. Thanks. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
264254 +++$+++ Dave101 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264250 +++$+++ 264253 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.183574580E09 +++$+++ Per [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission]], a notice on the website is not needed, a simple email to info@dragonphoto.co.uk would be the simplest option. I feel this would have been the better option rather than removing the images. <u><font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ ::Per [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission]], a notice on the website is not needed, a simple email to info@dragonphoto.co.uk would be the simplest option. I feel this would have been the better option rather than removing the images. <u><font color="black">[[User:Dave101|Dave101]]</font></u><small>→<font color="AE1C28">[[User talk:Dave101|''talk'']]</font></small>&nbsp; 11:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
264255 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264250 +++$+++ 264254 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.183574760E09 +++$+++ Possibly a better solution, yes, but we get so many copyright violations that I tend to be quite strict. As you seem to be charitably donating the images (as opposed to Wikipedia requesting them), then it was up to your company to follow the 'Donotating' advice.  +++$+++ :::Possibly a better solution, yes, but we get so many copyright violations that I tend to be quite strict. As you seem to be charitably donating the images (as opposed to Wikipedia requesting them), then it was up to your company to follow the 'Donotating' advice. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
264256 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264250 +++$+++ 264250 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.183851000E09 +++$+++ Typing in capitals is equivalent to shouting and is deemed [[WP:CIVIL|incivil]]. Please follow the instructions at Donating Images, as per my advice several days ago. I will not enter into email correspondence.  +++$+++ :Typing in capitals is equivalent to shouting and is deemed [[WP:CIVIL|incivil]]. Please follow the instructions at Donating Images, as per my advice several days ago. I will not enter into email correspondence. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

526396 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526396 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-28 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.164708240E09 +++$+++ Just came across [[William R. Higgins]] and it needs alot of work.  Since you are the bio guy I thought I'd see if you have the time to fix it up.  If not I'll take a crack at it when able.  -- +++$+++ Just came across [[William R. Higgins]] and it needs alot of work.  Since you are the bio guy I thought I'd see if you have the time to fix it up.  If not I'll take a crack at it when able.  --[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 02:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
526397 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526396 +++$+++ 526396 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.164913800E09 +++$+++ Got another article for amending.  I just rated this one as Start but it is right on the cusp.  Take a look at [[Littleton Waller]] for me.  Just needs some cleaning up, proper refs, etc... and it will be good to go.  I would say that if you get the chance to clean it up then change it to B class yourself.  Cheers.-- +++$+++ * Got another article for amending.  I just rated this one as Start but it is right on the cusp.  Take a look at [[Littleton Waller]] for me.  Just needs some cleaning up, proper refs, etc... and it will be good to go.  I would say that if you get the chance to clean it up then change it to B class yourself.  Cheers.--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 11:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
526398 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526396 +++$+++ 526397 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.164997620E09 +++$+++ Another one needing work but I don't think you will be able to do much with this one....  [[Louis J. Carpellotti]].-- +++$+++ ** Another one needing work but I don't think you will be able to do much with this one....  [[Louis J. Carpellotti]].--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 10:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

2109 +++$+++ Pretzels +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2109 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-09 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.215642600E09 +++$+++ Hi futurebird, I thought some of the points you made on the Main Page Redesign discussiopn were really interesting, and wondered if you could give a little feedback on my current submission? Many thanks - [[Wikipedia:2008_main_page_redesign_proposal\/Pretzels|My submission &raquo;]] '''P<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">retzels<\/span>'''<sup> +++$+++ Hi futurebird, I thought some of the points you made on the Main Page Redesign discussiopn were really interesting, and wondered if you could give a little feedback on my current submission? Many thanks - [[Wikipedia:2008_main_page_redesign_proposal/Pretzels|My submission &raquo;]] '''P<span style="font-variant:small-caps">retzels</span>'''<sup>[[User:Pretzels|chatters]]</sup> 15:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
2110 +++$+++ Pretzels +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2109 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-10 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.215732720E09 +++$+++ Hello futurebird! I've taken into account the comments given on my proposal's discussion page and would love to know what you think of the results. [[Wikipedia:2008_main_page_redesign_proposal\/Pretzels|My submission &raquo;]] '''P<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">retzels<\/span>'''<sup> +++$+++ ::::Hello futurebird! I've taken into account the comments given on my proposal's discussion page and would love to know what you think of the results. [[Wikipedia:2008_main_page_redesign_proposal/Pretzels|My submission &raquo;]] '''P<span style="font-variant:small-caps">retzels</span>'''<sup>[[User:Pretzels|chatters]]</sup> 16:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

264258 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.183576320E09 +++$+++ <p>Problem articles should be dealt with using the existing PROD policy. My problem is with the review system. It gives more power to a particular group of people. They have created the guidelines (OK, based on an interpretation of an existing established guideline), and a process by which they will enforce it. This really seems at odds with one of the pillars of the project. (BTW, I will be away of a couple of days from now...)  +++$+++ <p>Problem articles should be dealt with using the existing PROD policy. My problem is with the review system. It gives more power to a particular group of people. They have created the guidelines (OK, based on an interpretation of an existing established guideline), and a process by which they will enforce it. This really seems at odds with one of the pillars of the project. (BTW, I will be away of a couple of days from now...) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
264259 +++$+++ Matthew +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264258 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.183577280E09 +++$+++ I totally agree with you on the notability issue (people don't seem to realise writers, directors, critical reception are real world information). I also agree with you about PROD, and if an editor objects to a proposed deletion then AfD would be the next venue. It's apparent to me that these users want the articles deleted, but have to settle for a redirect (really though, a redirect is just a cheap way of saying the history is preserved, but the article is gone).  +++$+++ ::I totally agree with you on the notability issue (people don't seem to realise writers, directors, critical reception are real world information). I also agree with you about PROD, and if an editor objects to a proposed deletion then AfD would be the next venue. It's apparent to me that these users want the articles deleted, but have to settle for a redirect (really though, a redirect is just a cheap way of saying the history is preserved, but the article is gone). [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 12:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

264260 +++$+++ Angie Y. +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-06 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.183707060E09 +++$+++ I agree with the rewrite, Matt.  +++$+++ I agree with the rewrite, Matt. [[User:Angie Y.|Angie Y.]] 00:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
264261 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.183931340E09 +++$+++ Please don't randomly remove tags without a good reason. Just having sources doesn't automatically assert notability (a few that you have reverted don't even have that much). As you are an admin, you really should know that your opinion doesn't trump [[WP:N]] (which isn't \"just a guideline.\" It directly correlates with [[WP:V]].).  +++$+++ :Please don't randomly remove tags without a good reason. Just having sources doesn't automatically assert notability (a few that you have reverted don't even have that much). As you are an admin, you really should know that your opinion doesn't trump [[WP:N]] (which isn't "just a guideline." It directly correlates with [[WP:V]].). [[User:TTN|TTN]] 14:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264262 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264261 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.183931580E09 +++$+++ Please don't add tags ''en masse''. As an admin, I abide by Wikipedia ''policy''. You do not have consensus. The articles are verifiable (policy). The guidelines says that plot summaries may be relevant when the subject is large.  +++$+++ ::Please don't add tags ''en masse''. As an admin, I abide by Wikipedia ''policy''. You do not have consensus. The articles are verifiable (policy). The guidelines says that plot summaries may be relevant when the subject is large. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264263 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264262 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.183931880E09 +++$+++ A cleanup\/notability tag is a cleanup\/notability tag. Extra functions (which have mostly been removed) or how they were added doesn't change that. You seem to be wikilawyering at this point. I suggest that you take it up at [[WP:N]] instead of asserting that these abide by [[WP:V]]. They don't abide by [[WP:V]] because a main point of it is \"reliable published sources\", which these don't have.  +++$+++ :::A cleanup/notability tag is a cleanup/notability tag. Extra functions (which have mostly been removed) or how they were added doesn't change that. You seem to be wikilawyering at this point. I suggest that you take it up at [[WP:N]] instead of asserting that these abide by [[WP:V]]. They don't abide by [[WP:V]] because a main point of it is "reliable published sources", which these don't have. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 14:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264264 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264262 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.183938840E09 +++$+++ \"Publishing\" on TV is legitimate verifiability for relevant matreial.  +++$+++ :::"Publishing" on TV is legitimate verifiability for relevant matreial. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264265 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264264 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.183939380E09 +++$+++ It is fine for sourcing some stuff, but it is not good enough to verify notability outside of the series that it is in, which is required.  +++$+++ ::::It is fine for sourcing some stuff, but it is not good enough to verify notability outside of the series that it is in, which is required. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 17:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264266 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264265 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.183951020E09 +++$+++ Which brings us to the POV of the whole discussion. Episodes are notable. I know you think they're not, but I do. That is the problem, and we're just going round in circles. [[WP:FICT]] also supports my interpretation. It's a shame that this is causing so much unrest as there are so many more important things on Wikipedia to worry about, such as unreferenced articles about living people.  +++$+++ :::::Which brings us to the POV of the whole discussion. Episodes are notable. I know you think they're not, but I do. That is the problem, and we're just going round in circles. [[WP:FICT]] also supports my interpretation. It's a shame that this is causing so much unrest as there are so many more important things on Wikipedia to worry about, such as unreferenced articles about living people. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264267 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264266 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.183951380E09 +++$+++ No, there is no POV to be had by myself. The view that episodes are not notable until proven so goes along with [[WP:N]] and [[WP:V]]. The same goes with any other topic, so episodes are no different. [[WP:FICT]] requires out of universe info like the rest, so there is no doubt in my mind that you are just misreading it completely (like many other people). Until you can show otherwise, the only people pushing a POV are people that somehow conclude that we can ignore [[WP:N]]. There are more than enough people to cover BLP, while most just ignore the pathetic state of fiction, so I would say it is definitely more important to focus on this at the moment.  +++$+++ ::::::No, there is no POV to be had by myself. The view that episodes are not notable until proven so goes along with [[WP:N]] and [[WP:V]]. The same goes with any other topic, so episodes are no different. [[WP:FICT]] requires out of universe info like the rest, so there is no doubt in my mind that you are just misreading it completely (like many other people). Until you can show otherwise, the only people pushing a POV are people that somehow conclude that we can ignore [[WP:N]]. There are more than enough people to cover BLP, while most just ignore the pathetic state of fiction, so I would say it is definitely more important to focus on this at the moment. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 20:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264268 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264264 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.183952040E09 +++$+++ It's a shame that you're not appreciating that your POV is just that. The guidelines are very good models for good\/featured articles. We do not delete (which is what you are doing considering the end user) just because there are limitations. Your 'assessment' of a wide range of articles as 'pathetic' is a hyperbolic adjective: POV.  +++$+++ ::::It's a shame that you're not appreciating that your POV is just that. The guidelines are very good models for good/featured articles. We do not delete (which is what you are doing considering the end user) just because there are limitations. Your 'assessment' of a wide range of articles as 'pathetic' is a hyperbolic adjective: POV. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264269 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264268 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.183952520E09 +++$+++ That doesn't matter if the articles will never even reach close to that. See, you actually have to show that these can meet even the lowest of standards for your case to even have a shot. Unless we can talk about a topic as its own thing, not solely as a part of another topic, we cannot cover it. That goes for relatives of famous people, single people that died in great catastrophes, locations, characters, and other parts of a series, and, \"surprise, surprise\", episodes of a series. Again, your opinion is nothing more than an opinion, while I can cite guidelines and policies in the very least (though I guess it is with a \"POV\").  +++$+++ :::::That doesn't matter if the articles will never even reach close to that. See, you actually have to show that these can meet even the lowest of standards for your case to even have a shot. Unless we can talk about a topic as its own thing, not solely as a part of another topic, we cannot cover it. That goes for relatives of famous people, single people that died in great catastrophes, locations, characters, and other parts of a series, and, "surprise, surprise", episodes of a series. Again, your opinion is nothing more than an opinion, while I can cite guidelines and policies in the very least (though I guess it is with a "POV"). [[User:TTN|TTN]] 20:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264270 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264268 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.183952940E09 +++$+++ And so you don't think otherwise, I am not against episode articles; only ones that cannot become anything are bad. As long as it can reach a decent standard, it is fine (take a look at some of the Simpsons GAs and obviously the few episode FAs). The problem with that is the obvious lack of real information for most episodes. A plot summary is useless without real information to back it up.  +++$+++ :::::And so you don't think otherwise, I am not against episode articles; only ones that cannot become anything are bad. As long as it can reach a decent standard, it is fine (take a look at some of the Simpsons GAs and obviously the few episode FAs). The problem with that is the obvious lack of real information for most episodes. A plot summary is useless without real information to back it up. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 20:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264271 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264268 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.183953300E09 +++$+++ The guidelines you cite in such a way are vague.  +++$+++ :::::The guidelines you cite in such a way are vague. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264272 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264271 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.183953780E09 +++$+++ Oh come on, \"[[WP:N|A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.]]\", \"[[WP:V|Articles should only contain material that has been published by reliable sources.]]\", \"[[WP:RS|Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable sources.]]\", \"[[WP:NOT#IINFO|Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance; such articles are not solely or overwhelmingly a summary of a work's plot. A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic.]]\", and the rest are hardly vague.  +++$+++ ::::::Oh come on, "[[WP:N|A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.]]", "[[WP:V|Articles should only contain material that has been published by reliable sources.]]", "[[WP:RS|Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable sources.]]", "[[WP:NOT#IINFO|Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance; such articles are not solely or overwhelmingly a summary of a work's plot. A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic.]]", and the rest are hardly vague. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 21:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264273 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264268 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.184306400E09 +++$+++ There are plenty of things articles should do. Many articles don't yet do them. Articles are developed. That's how the project works.  +++$+++ :::::There are plenty of things articles should do. Many articles don't yet do them. Articles are developed. That's how the project works. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
264274 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264273 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.184307180E09 +++$+++ When challenged, articles still need to assert a possibility of becoming good and standing on their own. We don't just leave them to rot forever because \"They'll be worked on soon!\" or \"They can become good! All we have to do is wait!\" After that, the articles aren't even edited for months on end. Plus, most have had well over a year to get past the hurdle.  +++$+++ ::::::When challenged, articles still need to assert a possibility of becoming good and standing on their own. We don't just leave them to rot forever because "They'll be worked on soon!" or "They can become good! All we have to do is wait!" After that, the articles aren't even edited for months on end. Plus, most have had well over a year to get past the hurdle. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 23:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
264275 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264268 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.184349840E09 +++$+++ OK, but for consistency, how do you feel about articles tagged as 'cleanup' or 'unreferenced'. (Cleaning those cats actually often flags up a few A7s PRODs or AFDs, to be fair.) Since I became aware of the GA process, I see everything below that as being rather poor anyway.  +++$+++ :::::OK, but for consistency, how do you feel about articles tagged as 'cleanup' or 'unreferenced'. (Cleaning those cats actually often flags up a few A7s PRODs or AFDs, to be fair.) Since I became aware of the GA process, I see everything below that as being rather poor anyway. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
264276 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264260 +++$+++ 264274 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.184350680E09 +++$+++ There are way too many different articles placed in those to actually give an opinion on them. But, basically, it should be all about chances for sources for the unreferenced articles. If all that is needed is a cleanup in format and writing, it's crappy, but it has potential.  +++$+++ :::::::There are way too many different articles placed in those to actually give an opinion on them. But, basically, it should be all about chances for sources for the unreferenced articles. If all that is needed is a cleanup in format and writing, it's crappy, but it has potential. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 11:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

480951 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-10 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.144732980E09 +++$+++ Listen, I've been dealing with this issue for a long time (several months) and to be honest with you, I'm sick and tired of it. Lee was a pitiful storm that stayed out at sea. All the info that needs to be said about it can more than easily be said in the main article. I can't tell you how many times I've said that but these pro-article wackos will demand an article for every little disturbance that forms until their dying breath. This WikiProject has laid down the criteria for article creation. Lee falls far short of that. And Epsilon is a longer, better written and more interesting article. -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ Listen, I've been dealing with this issue for a long time (several months) and to be honest with you, I'm sick and tired of it. Lee was a pitiful storm that stayed out at sea. All the info that needs to be said about it can more than easily be said in the main article. I can't tell you how many times I've said that but these pro-article wackos will demand an article for every little disturbance that forms until their dying breath. This WikiProject has laid down the criteria for article creation. Lee falls far short of that. And Epsilon is a longer, better written and more interesting article. -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]]<sup><small>[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=E.+Brown&amp;dbname=enwiki_p Damages]</small></sup><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 22:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
480952 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.144739100E09 +++$+++ My above comment was hardly a personal attack. An expression of exasperation yes, but not a personal attack; i.e. willfully saying something negative to put someone down or make them feel bad about themselves. And I like the list article, it just needs to be part of 2005 AHS. I'm against the seperation of the two, not the existance of either article. Of course, not that my opinion does any good. These pro-article gurus (is that nice enough?) are going to do whatever they're going to do, no matter what anyone else thinks. My objections have been repeatedly ignored on a several issues (splitting the article, creation of articles for every menial storm, and the button bars; which I let slide) so I guess I'm wasting my time. I hope you can understand my frustration. -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ :My above comment was hardly a personal attack. An expression of exasperation yes, but not a personal attack; i.e. willfully saying something negative to put someone down or make them feel bad about themselves. And I like the list article, it just needs to be part of 2005 AHS. I'm against the seperation of the two, not the existance of either article. Of course, not that my opinion does any good. These pro-article gurus (is that nice enough?) are going to do whatever they're going to do, no matter what anyone else thinks. My objections have been repeatedly ignored on a several issues (splitting the article, creation of articles for every menial storm, and the button bars; which I let slide) so I guess I'm wasting my time. I hope you can understand my frustration. -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]]<sup><small>[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=E.+Brown&amp;dbname=enwiki_p Damages]</small></sup><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 00:05, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
480953 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ 480952 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.144742940E09 +++$+++ Even if it was written as good as a Clive Cussler novel, I'd still be uncomfortable with its existance simply because it was as weak as a tropical storm could possibly be, did not hit land and caused no effects on land nor did it affect human interests at sea. I've backed down on many of the articles on the menial storms of '05 just to avoid starting World War III (Maria is a good example). Many people have cited the existance of article on rediculously menial things such as induvidual TV show episodes as a justification for creation of articles for every storm. This is like saying that because one man gets away with theft that stealing is OK. Just because other people let it slide doesn't mean it's a good idea. My personal belief is that a subject has to attain a certain level of notability before an article is justified. Lee fails miserably in the notability category. -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ ::Even if it was written as good as a Clive Cussler novel, I'd still be uncomfortable with its existance simply because it was as weak as a tropical storm could possibly be, did not hit land and caused no effects on land nor did it affect human interests at sea. I've backed down on many of the articles on the menial storms of '05 just to avoid starting World War III (Maria is a good example). Many people have cited the existance of article on rediculously menial things such as induvidual TV show episodes as a justification for creation of articles for every storm. This is like saying that because one man gets away with theft that stealing is OK. Just because other people let it slide doesn't mean it's a good idea. My personal belief is that a subject has to attain a certain level of notability before an article is justified. Lee fails miserably in the notability category. -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]]<sup><small>[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=E.+Brown&amp;dbname=enwiki_p Damages]</small></sup><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 01:09, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
480954 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ 480953 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.144744920E09 +++$+++ Pretty much, yeah. Vince, Epsilon and Zeta I don't have too much of a problem with. Ophelia is a well written article, I don't have a problem with it. The same applies with Beta. Alpha and Gamma have enough deaths to warrent an article and the articles have descent info. But the others don't really deserve articles. ''Some'' of the more tedious facts I wouldn't miss but basically I'd like to see the info in the list article cut and pasted back where it belongs. Not going to happen (unless we want to start World War III), but that's what I'd like to see. Each storm would have a subheading and all the info pertaining to it would be there, except for the notable storms, which would have summeries beneath their subheadings along with links to their respective articles. This is how it used to be done until the Atlantic went mad in 2005. It seems like everybody on the cyclone project, including myself, went mad with it. -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ :::Pretty much, yeah. Vince, Epsilon and Zeta I don't have too much of a problem with. Ophelia is a well written article, I don't have a problem with it. The same applies with Beta. Alpha and Gamma have enough deaths to warrent an article and the articles have descent info. But the others don't really deserve articles. ''Some'' of the more tedious facts I wouldn't miss but basically I'd like to see the info in the list article cut and pasted back where it belongs. Not going to happen (unless we want to start World War III), but that's what I'd like to see. Each storm would have a subheading and all the info pertaining to it would be there, except for the notable storms, which would have summeries beneath their subheadings along with links to their respective articles. This is how it used to be done until the Atlantic went mad in 2005. It seems like everybody on the cyclone project, including myself, went mad with it. -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]]<sup><small>[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=E.+Brown&amp;dbname=enwiki_p Damages]</small></sup><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 01:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
480955 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ 480954 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.144746840E09 +++$+++ Ah, so you guys see the season and the storms as two seperate entities. That may be the core of the very dispute right there. (\"The diagnosed part's right. It's the curin' part I'm havin' trouble with.\" ;) -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ ::::Ah, so you guys see the season and the storms as two seperate entities. That may be the core of the very dispute right there. ("The diagnosed part's right. It's the curin' part I'm havin' trouble with." ;) -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]]<sup><small>[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=E.+Brown&amp;dbname=enwiki_p Damages]</small></sup><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 02:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
480956 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ 480955 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.144798740E09 +++$+++ Sounds good. -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ :::::Sounds good. -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]]<sup><small>[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=E.+Brown&amp;dbname=enwiki_p Damages]</small></sup><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 16:39, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
480957 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ 480956 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.144823820E09 +++$+++ Huh? -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ ::::::Huh? -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]]<sup><small>[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=E.+Brown&amp;dbname=enwiki_p Damages]</small></sup><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 23:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
480958 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ 480955 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.144825140E09 +++$+++ What do you mean \"isolated in 2005\"? I spend most of my time here outside of 2005AHS. I got tired of the chaos and frustration. The only thing I've gotten out of that message is that you want to try and work out a compromise on the 2005 stuff, which I've been trying unsuccessfully to do for a while now. -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ :::::What do you mean "isolated in 2005"? I spend most of my time here outside of 2005AHS. I got tired of the chaos and frustration. The only thing I've gotten out of that message is that you want to try and work out a compromise on the 2005 stuff, which I've been trying unsuccessfully to do for a while now. -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]]<sup><small>[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=E.+Brown&amp;dbname=enwiki_p Damages]</small></sup><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 23:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
480959 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ 480955 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.144872780E09 +++$+++ A mediation sounds like a good idea. I don't think we're about ready to slit each other's throats yet but the bickering is getting a little old. -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ :::::A mediation sounds like a good idea. I don't think we're about ready to slit each other's throats yet but the bickering is getting a little old. -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]]<sup><small>[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=E.+Brown&amp;dbname=enwiki_p Damages]</small></sup><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 13:13, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
480960 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ 480959 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.145072520E09 +++$+++ Nilfanion, where's this mediation you've been talking about? -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ ::::::Nilfanion, where's this mediation you've been talking about? -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]]<sup><small>[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=E.+Brown&amp;dbname=enwiki_p Damages]</small></sup><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 20:42, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
480961 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ 480955 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.145073720E09 +++$+++ Well I'm sorry to hear that, Nil. I'm sure we can work something out. -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ :::::Well I'm sorry to hear that, Nil. I'm sure we can work something out. -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]]<sup><small>[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=E.+Brown&amp;dbname=enwiki_p Damages]</small></sup><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 21:02, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
480962 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 480951 +++$+++ 480961 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.145076780E09 +++$+++ Good, because I've had way too much agrivation on 2005 AHS and if it continues much longer, I don't know if I'll keep working on it. -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ ::::::Good, because I've had way too much agrivation on 2005 AHS and if it continues much longer, I don't know if I'll keep working on it. -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]]<sup><small>[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=E.+Brown&amp;dbname=enwiki_p Damages]</small></sup><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 21:53, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

2125 +++$+++ PhaserNine +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2125 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-31 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.262306340E09 +++$+++ Hi Futurebird, I was just wondering what POV you saw in the sentence. Also, the reference cited is an academic paper describing the higher crime rate among African Americans and then it presents a novel reason for the cause of this. You stated that the source did not support the sentence, but the source states\"While African Americans are most likely the victims of violent acts, they are also the most likely to be the perpetrators of violence. Looking at the Bureau of Justice Statistics (Fox 2004) homicide data, African Americans are seven times more likely than whites to commit a homicide. Also, most homicides are committed against someone of the same race as the perpetrator (Fox 2004). So, African Americans are the most likely to commit homicide, and they are most likely to perpetrate such an act against another African American. We can therefore understand the huge risk that African Americans, especially young males, face in terms of experiencing such violent victimization. Many explanations have been offered for the higher rates of crime and violent victimization among African Americans.\"  +++$+++ Hi Futurebird, I was just wondering what POV you saw in the sentence. Also, the reference cited is an academic paper describing the higher crime rate among African Americans and then it presents a novel reason for the cause of this. You stated that the source did not support the sentence, but the source states"While African Americans are most likely the victims of violent acts, they are also the most likely to be the perpetrators of violence. Looking at the Bureau of Justice Statistics (Fox 2004) homicide data, African Americans are seven times more likely than whites to commit a homicide. Also, most homicides are committed against someone of the same race as the perpetrator (Fox 2004). So, African Americans are the most likely to commit homicide, and they are most likely to perpetrate such an act against another African American. We can therefore understand the huge risk that African Americans, especially young males, face in terms of experiencing such violent victimization. Many explanations have been offered for the higher rates of crime and violent victimization among African Americans." [[User:PhaserNine|PhaserNine]] ([[User talk:PhaserNine|talk]]) 16:39, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
2126 +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2125 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-31 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.262310180E09 +++$+++ It would be fine for an article about race and crime but this article is about stereotypes-- not crime rates. What has your source said about stereotypes?  +++$+++ ::It would be fine for an article about race and crime but this article is about stereotypes-- not crime rates. What has your source said about stereotypes? [[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] ([[User talk:Futurebird#top|talk]]) 17:43, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
2127 +++$+++ PhaserNine +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2125 +++$+++ 2125 +++$+++ 2009-12-31 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.262310540E09 +++$+++ I did not see this prior to my revision of your edit. I will revert it for now.  +++$+++ :I did not see this prior to my revision of your edit. I will revert it for now. [[User:PhaserNine|PhaserNine]] ([[User talk:PhaserNine|talk]]) 17:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

526414 +++$+++ Epeefleche +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526414 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.165974540E09 +++$+++ hi ... can u pls give the url for the single years rule that u mentioned on the Mussina article?  tx.-- +++$+++ hi ... can u pls give the url for the single years rule that u mentioned on the Mussina article?  tx.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] 17:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
526415 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526414 +++$+++ 526414 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.165992180E09 +++$+++ Actually, I never edited the Mussina article.  I think you are referring to a recent edit to the [[Andy Pettitte]] article.  Here is the MOS guideline page &mdash; [[Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context]].  &mdash;  +++$+++ :Actually, I never edited the Mussina article.  I think you are referring to a recent edit to the [[Andy Pettitte]] article.  Here is the MOS guideline page &mdash; [[Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context]].  &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 22:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

2128 +++$+++ ADM +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2128 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-01 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.262353620E09 +++$+++ I think there should maybe be a specialized article about [[abortion in the African American community]]. Many scientific surveys have reported that African American women have an unusual amount of abortions, one of the highest in the United States and indeed of the entire world. It would therefore be appropriate to have an entry which would explain this phenomenon. [http:\/\/www.nbccongress.org\/features\/abortion_silent_no_more_01.asp][http:\/\/www.abortionfacts.com\/learn\/blacks_and_abortion.asp]  +++$+++ I think there should maybe be a specialized article about [[abortion in the African American community]]. Many scientific surveys have reported that African American women have an unusual amount of abortions, one of the highest in the United States and indeed of the entire world. It would therefore be appropriate to have an entry which would explain this phenomenon. [http://www.nbccongress.org/features/abortion_silent_no_more_01.asp][http://www.abortionfacts.com/learn/blacks_and_abortion.asp] [[User:ADM|ADM]] ([[User talk:ADM|talk]]) 05:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
2129 +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2128 +++$+++ 2128 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.262353920E09 +++$+++ Those sources won't work-- they seems to be making some kind of political point.  +++$+++ :Those sources won't work-- they seems to be making some kind of political point. [[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] ([[User talk:Futurebird|talk]]) 05:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
2130 +++$+++ ADM +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2128 +++$+++ 2129 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.262354160E09 +++$+++ There are also sources that present a more balanced point of view, such as these. [http:\/\/www.ourbodiesourselves.org\/book\/companion.asp?id=20&compID=41][http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/1420666]  +++$+++ ::There are also sources that present a more balanced point of view, such as these. [http://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/book/companion.asp?id=20&compID=41][http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1420666] [[User:ADM|ADM]] ([[User talk:ADM|talk]]) 05:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
2131 +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2128 +++$+++ 2130 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.262354580E09 +++$+++ The first one is also a little too political. The 2nd source is pretty good, though it would be nice to read the whole paper. The 2nd source addresses the broader issue of fertility. I think that might be the way to go on this topic-- don't make it just about abortion. I have also seen some important papers about access to fertility medicine in black communities. The gist was that doctors did not take concerns from black women about their reproductive health as seriously. So, if a black woman was having trouble conceiving she might be less likely to get information about treatments for fertility problems from her doctor.  +++$+++ :::The first one is also a little too political. The 2nd source is pretty good, though it would be nice to read the whole paper. The 2nd source addresses the broader issue of fertility. I think that might be the way to go on this topic-- don't make it just about abortion. I have also seen some important papers about access to fertility medicine in black communities. The gist was that doctors did not take concerns from black women about their reproductive health as seriously. So, if a black woman was having trouble conceiving she might be less likely to get information about treatments for fertility problems from her doctor. [[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] ([[User talk:Futurebird#top|talk]]) 06:03, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
2132 +++$+++ ADM +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2128 +++$+++ 2131 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.262355000E09 +++$+++ Regarding fertility, I also found relevant sources that seem to be related to the original topic. [http:\/\/findarticles.com\/p\/articles\/mi_m1077\/is_n7_v50\/ai_16878134\/][http:\/\/www.blacknews.com\/pr\/infertility101.html][http:\/\/www.scribd.com\/doc\/9023853\/Fertility-and-the-AbortionCrime-Debate][http:\/\/articles.latimes.com\/1999\/jul\/25\/news\/mn-59459][http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/pss\/3089617]  +++$+++ ::::Regarding fertility, I also found relevant sources that seem to be related to the original topic. [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1077/is_n7_v50/ai_16878134/][http://www.blacknews.com/pr/infertility101.html][http://www.scribd.com/doc/9023853/Fertility-and-the-AbortionCrime-Debate][http://articles.latimes.com/1999/jul/25/news/mn-59459][http://www.jstor.org/pss/3089617] [[User:ADM|ADM]] ([[User talk:ADM|talk]]) 06:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

526419 +++$+++ Picaroon9288 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526419 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-14 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.166159220E09 +++$+++ Hi ERcheck. You removed both the anon attack and my {{tl|db-attack}} with your edit. Is there any reason not to just delete [[:Image talk:BNTM2all.jpg]]? Right now, the attack is still in the history and the edit summary.  +++$+++ Hi ERcheck. You removed both the anon attack and my {{tl|db-attack}} with your edit. Is there any reason not to just delete [[:Image talk:BNTM2all.jpg]]? Right now, the attack is still in the history and the edit summary. [[User talk:Picaroon9288|Þicaroon]] 21:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
526420 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526419 +++$+++ 526419 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.166164860E09 +++$+++ Done. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Done. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 22:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

264277 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264277 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-07 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.183851540E09 +++$+++ Hello. [[User:Durin\/Fair use overuse explanation|This]] is a very clear explanation of non-free image overuse. Your recent edit summary made no sense in this respect. The difference between the images that were removed and the ones that remain is the ''quantity'' of those that remain! Wikipedia is not some cheap Geocities site with haphazard images dotted about for illiterates who can't go a paragraph without a pretty picture to look at. Non-free images are really enhance an understanding of the subject when words fall short. Most of the images are there merely for illustration, not to enhance understanding. I hope this is clear: I note other editors have attempted to explain this to you.  +++$+++ Hello. [[User:Durin/Fair use overuse explanation|This]] is a very clear explanation of non-free image overuse. Your recent edit summary made no sense in this respect. The difference between the images that were removed and the ones that remain is the ''quantity'' of those that remain! Wikipedia is not some cheap Geocities site with haphazard images dotted about for illiterates who can't go a paragraph without a pretty picture to look at. Non-free images are really enhance an understanding of the subject when words fall short. Most of the images are there merely for illustration, not to enhance understanding. I hope this is clear: I note other editors have attempted to explain this to you. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
264278 +++$+++ Jameshdl +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264277 +++$+++ 264277 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.183871940E09 +++$+++ Apoligies, I understand that you know more about the workings about wikipedia and I thank you for the message. Be good.  +++$+++ :Apoligies, I understand that you know more about the workings about wikipedia and I thank you for the message. Be good. [[User:Jameshdl|Jameshdl]] 22:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

2134 +++$+++ WeijiBaikeBianji +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-19 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.282204200E09 +++$+++ <div class=\"floatleft\" style=\"margin-bottom:0\">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]<\/div>I have nominated [[Snyderman and Rothman (study)]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Snyderman and Rothman (study)&#32; (2nd nomination)]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning -->  +++$+++ <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[Snyderman and Rothman (study)]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snyderman and Rothman (study)&#32; (2nd nomination)]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:WeijiBaikeBianji|WeijiBaikeBianji]] ([[User talk:WeijiBaikeBianji|talk]]) 00:50, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
2135 +++$+++ WeijiBaikeBianji +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ 2134 +++$+++ 2134 +++$+++ 2010-08-19 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.282207260E09 +++$+++ Hi, Futurebird, the posting of the notice above was automated, as part of the AfD process, and since the notice was posted I have been digging deeper into the article history and I see that the article as you originally posted it was much less of a point-of-view article than it has become, alas. I appreciate your balanced sourcing of the article as you originally created it. My sense of what is expedient for Wikipedia as an encyclopedia with neutral point of view{{emdash}}but feel free to disagree with me, as I see you are knowledgeable about these issues{{emdash}}is that it would be better for the Snyderman and Rothman \"study\" to have less prominence in the encyclopedia and rather to represent scholarly consensus about Snyderman and Rothman's publications through comments in the very few Wikipedia articles for which their publications would be useful sources. But I will listed to your opinion as the deletion discussion unfolds. See you among the articles. --  +++$+++ : Hi, Futurebird, the posting of the notice above was automated, as part of the AfD process, and since the notice was posted I have been digging deeper into the article history and I see that the article as you originally posted it was much less of a point-of-view article than it has become, alas. I appreciate your balanced sourcing of the article as you originally created it. My sense of what is expedient for Wikipedia as an encyclopedia with neutral point of view{{emdash}}but feel free to disagree with me, as I see you are knowledgeable about these issues{{emdash}}is that it would be better for the Snyderman and Rothman "study" to have less prominence in the encyclopedia and rather to represent scholarly consensus about Snyderman and Rothman's publications through comments in the very few Wikipedia articles for which their publications would be useful sources. But I will listed to your opinion as the deletion discussion unfolds. See you among the articles. -- [[User:WeijiBaikeBianji|WeijiBaikeBianji]] ([[User talk:WeijiBaikeBianji|talk]]) 01:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

526423 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526423 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-15 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.166221920E09 +++$+++ You posted [[User:Darkherox]] on [[WP:AIV]] for a username violation.  Please explain why this is a violation.  (I've removed it from the AIV notice board.) &mdash;  +++$+++ You posted [[User:Darkherox]] on [[WP:AIV]] for a username violation.  Please explain why this is a violation.  (I've removed it from the AIV notice board.) &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 14:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
526424 +++$+++ Mr Stephen +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526423 +++$+++ 526423 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.166222280E09 +++$+++ The username I'm trying to bring to your attention is \"Come and fuck me\".  I reported it using Vandalproof, and it has a bug with usernames containing spaces.  I tried to correct it, but Antivandlbot reverted me twice.  Apologies for the confusion.   +++$+++ :The username I'm trying to bring to your attention is "Come and fuck me".  I reported it using Vandalproof, and it has a bug with usernames containing spaces.  I tried to correct it, but Antivandlbot reverted me twice.  Apologies for the confusion.  [[User:Mr Stephen|Mr Stephen]] 14:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

264280 +++$+++ Edito*Magica +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-09 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.184044860E09 +++$+++ All information I have incorperated into [[five's image]] is from reliable sources.  +++$+++ All information I have incorperated into [[five's image]] is from reliable sources. [[User:Edito*Magica|Edito*Magica]] 22:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
264281 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264280 +++$+++ 264280 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.184045340E09 +++$+++ Could you please specify what these reliable sources are at the appropriate points in the article.  +++$+++ :Could you please specify what these reliable sources are at the appropriate points in the article. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

526425 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526425 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-15 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.166250600E09 +++$+++ Thanks, -- +++$+++ Thanks, --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] 22:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
526426 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526425 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-16 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.166335020E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for the reply on my user talk page.  I'll try to expand the article on Monday and Tuesday, so that it contains the minimum number of words required for nomination in the DYK section.  Unfortunately, I didn't offhand see any one location on the Net for detailed info on Tregaskis, so I'll probably have to glean bits and pieces from here and there.  Actually, I do have access to [http:\/\/www.newspaperarchive.com newspaperarchive.com] and will see if I cannot find his obituary.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Hi, thanks for the reply on my user talk page.  I'll try to expand the article on Monday and Tuesday, so that it contains the minimum number of words required for nomination in the DYK section.  Unfortunately, I didn't offhand see any one location on the Net for detailed info on Tregaskis, so I'll probably have to glean bits and pieces from here and there.  Actually, I do have access to [http://www.newspaperarchive.com newspaperarchive.com] and will see if I cannot find his obituary.  Sincerely, --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] 21:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
526427 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526425 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.166491740E09 +++$+++ Hi, again.  I've expanded the [[Richard Tregaskis]] article.  Do you think it is suitable for nomination as a [[Wikipedia:Did you know|DYK]]?  (I thought all DYK nominations had to be at least 1,000 words in length; but, actually, the regulations says 1,000 \"characters\" in length.  So the article is safe on these grounds.)  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::Hi, again.  I've expanded the [[Richard Tregaskis]] article.  Do you think it is suitable for nomination as a [[Wikipedia:Did you know|DYK]]?  (I thought all DYK nominations had to be at least 1,000 words in length; but, actually, the regulations says 1,000 "characters" in length.  So the article is safe on these grounds.)  Sincerely, --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] 17:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
526428 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526425 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.166667420E09 +++$+++ Cool, it was chosen for the DYK.  Thanks again for your help!!!  -- +++$+++ :::::Cool, it was chosen for the DYK.  Thanks again for your help!!!  --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] 18:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
526429 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526425 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-21 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.166702880E09 +++$+++ ERcheck, I didn't notice until today that you are an administrator.  As such, do you think I am qualified to be an administrator, based on my record?  I believe I've been active on Wikipedia since June (I think).  I'm in no hurry, however, if you think I am not ready.  Really, if you could give me feedback on this topic, I'd appreciate it!  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::::::ERcheck, I didn't notice until today that you are an administrator.  As such, do you think I am qualified to be an administrator, based on my record?  I believe I've been active on Wikipedia since June (I think).  I'm in no hurry, however, if you think I am not ready.  Really, if you could give me feedback on this topic, I'd appreciate it!  Sincerely, --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] 04:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

264282 +++$+++ Squirepants101 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264282 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-15 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.184558580E09 +++$+++ I was wondering whether common sense should be used in this situation. In my opinion, I don't expect every single episode article with secondary sources to reach featured article status, but it seems strange that five minutes after TTN replied to my question, you leave a message to not accept his opinion, especially since you were in involved in the TFD, MFD, and the CFD. I do not which opinion I should accept. <font color=\"orange\"> +++$+++ I was wondering whether common sense should be used in this situation. In my opinion, I don't expect every single episode article with secondary sources to reach featured article status, but it seems strange that five minutes after TTN replied to my question, you leave a message to not accept his opinion, especially since you were in involved in the TFD, MFD, and the CFD. I do not which opinion I should accept. <font color="orange">[[User:Squirepants101|Pants]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Squirepants101|(T)]]</sup> 21:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
264283 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264282 +++$+++ 264282 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.184559480E09 +++$+++ Well, it's good that yore acknowledging that these are opinions. The danger is when opinions masquerade as something that we should abide be.<p>[[WP:FICT]] and the odd TV EPISODE spin-off clearly allow for episode articles. Your article contains verifiable, secondary, reliable sources. This meets policy. FICT allows for spin-off articles when the body of work is large. It is clear that this article (the only one I have checked) is acceptable. Just because it is currently missing a couple of sections does not mean that it should not exist. [[WP:STUB]] suggests that incomplete articles are better than none as they draw new editors to the project.  +++$+++ :Well, it's good that yore acknowledging that these are opinions. The danger is when opinions masquerade as something that we should abide be.<p>[[WP:FICT]] and the odd TV EPISODE spin-off clearly allow for episode articles. Your article contains verifiable, secondary, reliable sources. This meets policy. FICT allows for spin-off articles when the body of work is large. It is clear that this article (the only one I have checked) is acceptable. Just because it is currently missing a couple of sections does not mean that it should not exist. [[WP:STUB]] suggests that incomplete articles are better than none as they draw new editors to the project. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
264284 +++$+++ Squirepants101 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264282 +++$+++ 264283 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.184560200E09 +++$+++ I am not going to revert the redirect for the article because I want to avoid a [[WP:DISPUTE|dispute]]. Perhaps you should try talking to TTN on his talk page or at the [[WP:EPISODE]] talk page. <font color=\"orange\"> +++$+++ ::I am not going to revert the redirect for the article because I want to avoid a [[WP:DISPUTE|dispute]]. Perhaps you should try talking to TTN on his talk page or at the [[WP:EPISODE]] talk page. <font color="orange">[[User:Squirepants101|Pants]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Squirepants101|(T)]]</sup> 21:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
264285 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264282 +++$+++ 264284 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.184567520E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately it's going to get that way: people are just going to conform automatically. The project is imploding. You're right, though: it's not worth it: no one treats the content of the project as seriously as those who waste their life creating and editing it. I certainly aim not to waste as much time as in the past.  +++$+++ :::Unfortunately it's going to get that way: people are just going to conform automatically. The project is imploding. You're right, though: it's not worth it: no one treats the content of the project as seriously as those who waste their life creating and editing it. I certainly aim not to waste as much time as in the past. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
264286 +++$+++ Squirepants101 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264282 +++$+++ 264285 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.184568600E09 +++$+++ Are referring to Wikipedia as a whole or just the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Television\/Episode coverage|taskforce]]? If you mean Wikipedia, why do you think it's collapsing? <font color=\"orange\"> +++$+++ ::::Are referring to Wikipedia as a whole or just the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Episode coverage|taskforce]]? If you mean Wikipedia, why do you think it's collapsing? <font color="orange">[[User:Squirepants101|Pants]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Squirepants101|(T)]]</sup> 23:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
264287 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264282 +++$+++ 264282 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.184862480E09 +++$+++ I contributed ''to'' the LightWater Valley page, yes. I have no connection to the park or any similar establishment whatsoever.  +++$+++ :I contributed ''to'' the LightWater Valley page, yes. I have no connection to the park or any similar establishment whatsoever. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
264288 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264282 +++$+++ 264282 +++$+++ 2007-07-20 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.184969760E09 +++$+++ I'm sure I'll get over it.  +++$+++ :I'm sure I'll get over it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

567398 +++$+++ Butwhatdoiknow +++$+++ Morphh +++$+++ 567398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-09 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.223620740E09 +++$+++ Oops. The new talk\/edit links don't work at [[Wikipedia:Lead section TT first sentence content]] and [[Wikipedia:Lead section TT first sentence format]]. Can you fix them? If so, would you please do so?  +++$+++ Oops. The new talk/edit links don't work at [[Wikipedia:Lead section TT first sentence content]] and [[Wikipedia:Lead section TT first sentence format]]. Can you fix them? If so, would you please do so? [[User:Butwhatdoiknow|Butwhatdoiknow]] ([[User talk:Butwhatdoiknow|talk]]) 23:39, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
567399 +++$+++ Butwhatdoiknow +++$+++ Morphh +++$+++ 567398 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-10 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.223625600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the quick response. I agree, no problem with the show\/hide. The problem is with the new talk\/edit feature. It currently points to my Sandbox pages and I couldn't figure out how to make it point to the transclude text page so that it opens up the proper edit or talk page.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the quick response. I agree, no problem with the show/hide. The problem is with the new talk/edit feature. It currently points to my Sandbox pages and I couldn't figure out how to make it point to the transclude text page so that it opens up the proper edit or talk page. [[User:Butwhatdoiknow|Butwhatdoiknow]] ([[User talk:Butwhatdoiknow|talk]]) 01:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
567400 +++$+++ Butwhatdoiknow +++$+++ Morphh +++$+++ 567398 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-10 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.223663340E09 +++$+++ Great! Thanks.  +++$+++ ::::Great! Thanks. [[User:Butwhatdoiknow|Butwhatdoiknow]] ([[User talk:Butwhatdoiknow|talk]]) 11:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
567401 +++$+++ Butwhatdoiknow +++$+++ Morphh +++$+++ 567398 +++$+++ 567398 +++$+++ 2008-10-10 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.223663460E09 +++$+++ Say, do you mind if I cut and paste this comment (starting with the second sentence) on to the wp:Transclude text talk page?  +++$+++ :Say, do you mind if I cut and paste this comment (starting with the second sentence) on to the wp:Transclude text talk page? [[User:Butwhatdoiknow|Butwhatdoiknow]] ([[User talk:Butwhatdoiknow|talk]]) 11:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

264289 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-22 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.185091980E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page. [[User:NHRHS2010|<font color="red" face="papyrus">'''NHRHS2010'''</font>]][[User talk:NHRHS2010|<sup><small><font color= "black">''' Talk '''</font></small></sup>]] 01:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
264290 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264289 +++$+++ 264289 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 10:25:00 +++$+++ 1.185211500E09 +++$+++ OK. There are many grammatical errors made in speech, and I'm not convinced that this is such a big enough issue to point out with [sic]. The place would be littered with [sic] if we included it after everyone's [[Lynne Truss|Trussian]] pet peeve. We should really restrict sic for factual errors. (I've seen sic used for gender political reasons too.)  +++$+++ :OK. There are many grammatical errors made in speech, and I'm not convinced that this is such a big enough issue to point out with [sic]. The place would be littered with [sic] if we included it after everyone's [[Lynne Truss|Trussian]] pet peeve. We should really restrict sic for factual errors. (I've seen sic used for gender political reasons too.) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:25, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

264291 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks in advance17:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ Thanks in advance17:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
264292 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264291 +++$+++ 264291 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.185900540E09 +++$+++ I know what you mean about arguing with kiddies. It's the school holidays so you're going to get loads of arguments over pop culture articles. Think of them with the contempt they deserve and let them get stressed, not you. Personally I'm not putting as much time into the project now, and some articles are lacking some major development as a result.  +++$+++ :I know what you mean about arguing with kiddies. It's the school holidays so you're going to get loads of arguments over pop culture articles. Think of them with the contempt they deserve and let them get stressed, not you. Personally I'm not putting as much time into the project now, and some articles are lacking some major development as a result. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

264293 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-24 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.185330060E09 +++$+++ Please look at the merge discussion linked in one of my summaries. You may find the article acceptable, but the Simpsons project is merging minor characters like that.  +++$+++ Please look at the merge discussion linked in one of my summaries. You may find the article acceptable, but the Simpsons project is merging minor characters like that. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 19:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
264294 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264293 +++$+++ 264293 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.185346140E09 +++$+++ As I have mentioned before, you really should be holding the views of Wikipedia (signified by [[WP:N]], [[WP:V]], and [[WP:RS]] in this case) far above your own. In the very least, you should try to change the guidelines instead of messing around with a few articles here and there.  +++$+++ :As I have mentioned before, you really should be holding the views of Wikipedia (signified by [[WP:N]], [[WP:V]], and [[WP:RS]] in this case) far above your own. In the very least, you should try to change the guidelines instead of messing around with a few articles here and there. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 23:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
264295 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264293 +++$+++ 264293 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.185900360E09 +++$+++ Well, Wikipedia is not a [[WP:CRYSTAL|crystal ball]], nor is it a news site. I'd support removing the entire section, or condensing it into one short paragraph.  +++$+++ :Well, Wikipedia is not a [[WP:CRYSTAL|crystal ball]], nor is it a news site. I'd support removing the entire section, or condensing it into one short paragraph. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
264296 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264293 +++$+++ 264293 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.185944040E09 +++$+++ Ah, I didn't spot that. Thanks for clearing it up.  +++$+++ :Ah, I didn't spot that. Thanks for clearing it up. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
264297 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264293 +++$+++ 264296 +++$+++ 2007-08-05 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.186340880E09 +++$+++ Just want to bump up this comment, just incase you didn't see it in the first place. <span style=\"font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ ::Just want to bump up this comment, just incase you didn't see it in the first place. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;">[[User:Dalejenkins|Dalejenkins]] | <small>[[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Apprentice (UK)|The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say!]]</small></span> 12:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

526439 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-22 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.166857680E09 +++$+++ I believe the text will be used.   +++$+++ I believe the text will be used.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
526440 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526439 +++$+++ 526439 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.166879160E09 +++$+++ I don't know what's wrong. Tell you what, write your e-amil add in my talk page then I'll e-mail you and you should be able to respond.  +++$+++ :I don't know what's wrong. Tell you what, write your e-amil add in my talk page then I'll e-mail you and you should be able to respond. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 05:06, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

2152 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ -Majestic- +++$+++ 2152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-15 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.210885380E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you reverted an anon, with an edit summary saying that it was \"vandalism\".[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Black_Mesa_%28game_mod%29&diff=next&oldid=212539614] However, that doesn't look like vandalism to me,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Black_Mesa_%28game_mod%29&diff=212539614&oldid=212470604]  it looks like a content dispute. The word \"vandalism\" should be reserved for blatant cases, such as page blanking or profanity.  See [[WP:VANDAL]]. -- +++$+++ I noticed that you reverted an anon, with an edit summary saying that it was "vandalism".[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Mesa_%28game_mod%29&diff=next&oldid=212539614] However, that doesn't look like vandalism to me,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Mesa_%28game_mod%29&diff=212539614&oldid=212470604]  it looks like a content dispute. The word "vandalism" should be reserved for blatant cases, such as page blanking or profanity.  See [[WP:VANDAL]]. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 14:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
2153 +++$+++ -Majestic- +++$+++ -Majestic- +++$+++ 2152 +++$+++ 2152 +++$+++ 2008-05-15 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.210886700E09 +++$+++ He claimed the Black Mesa project was no longer active, which is not the case. There is no dispute, the project is not dead. I agree that it wasn't serious vandalism but after I saw his [[Special:Contributions\/64.27.16.202|previous contributions]] and his [[User talk:64.27.16.202|talk page]] I decided to put the warning message. -- +++$+++ :He claimed the Black Mesa project was no longer active, which is not the case. There is no dispute, the project is not dead. I agree that it wasn't serious vandalism but after I saw his [[Special:Contributions/64.27.16.202|previous contributions]] and his [[User talk:64.27.16.202|talk page]] I decided to put the warning message. --[[User:-Majestic-|-Majestic-]] ([[User talk:-Majestic-#top|talk]]) 14:25, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
2154 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ -Majestic- +++$+++ 2152 +++$+++ 2153 +++$+++ 2008-05-15 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.210887480E09 +++$+++ I understand the confusion, I had the same reaction when I saw the vandalism warning placed on a different anon's page.   I'd blocked the anon before for disruption, so assumed that the newest warning was valid and that I needed to block again.  But on digging into it, it looked like a legitimate difference of opinion.  This is often the case with vandal accounts, especially when editing game articles.  I often find that the anons are run by teenagers, who have no trouble with vandalizing articles about geography or history, but when it comes to ''game'' articles, they get very serious and make legitimate and good faith edits.  ;) For myself, I often see the game articles as a way to \"get through\" to new users, to try and turn them away from the [[Dark side (Star Wars)|Dark Side]] and towards legitimate editing. :) So it's best not to escalate things with a vandalism warning.  In a severe case, a warning for ''disruption'' might be appropriate, but if at all possible I find it's better to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]].  Often when editors (even disruptive ones) are treated with respect, they will respond in kind. Not always, but it's worth a shot.  :) -- +++$+++ :: I understand the confusion, I had the same reaction when I saw the vandalism warning placed on a different anon's page.   I'd blocked the anon before for disruption, so assumed that the newest warning was valid and that I needed to block again.  But on digging into it, it looked like a legitimate difference of opinion.  This is often the case with vandal accounts, especially when editing game articles.  I often find that the anons are run by teenagers, who have no trouble with vandalizing articles about geography or history, but when it comes to ''game'' articles, they get very serious and make legitimate and good faith edits.  ;) For myself, I often see the game articles as a way to "get through" to new users, to try and turn them away from the [[Dark side (Star Wars)|Dark Side]] and towards legitimate editing. :) So it's best not to escalate things with a vandalism warning.  In a severe case, a warning for ''disruption'' might be appropriate, but if at all possible I find it's better to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]].  Often when editors (even disruptive ones) are treated with respect, they will respond in kind. Not always, but it's worth a shot.  :) --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 14:38, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

612028 +++$+++ Atomic Religione +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-23 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.187921220E09 +++$+++ You can do it Poetic, if you choose to accept , you've got my full support.  +++$+++ You can do it Poetic, if you choose to accept , you've got my full support. [[User:Atomic Religione|Atomic Religione]] 19:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
612029 +++$+++ 3bulletproof16 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.187925360E09 +++$+++ Hurray! I wish you the best my friend! --  +++$+++ :Hurray! I wish you the best my friend! -- [[User:3bulletproof16|<font color="blue">'''bullet'''</font><font color="green">'''proof'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:3bulletproof16|<font color="black">'''3:16'''</font>]]</sup> 20:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
612030 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 612029 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.187925420E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I appreciate the support, but after only a few minutes, it's not looking too good... \/\/  +++$+++ ::Thanks. I appreciate the support, but after only a few minutes, it's not looking too good... // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 20:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
612031 +++$+++ 3bulletproof16 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 612030 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.187925600E09 +++$+++ Meh, its just constructive criticism. Whatever the outcome may end up being, I guarantee you'll come out stronger and wiser.--  +++$+++ :::Meh, its just constructive criticism. Whatever the outcome may end up being, I guarantee you'll come out stronger and wiser.-- [[User:3bulletproof16|<font color="blue">'''bullet'''</font><font color="green">'''proof'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:3bulletproof16|<font color="black">'''3:16'''</font>]]</sup> 20:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
612032 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.187925900E09 +++$+++ I strongly suggest that you improve upon question 1. Whatever you do though, ''don't'' reword your original answer. Instead, write an expanded answer ''underneath'' your original answer to question 1. If you don't add an expanded answer to question 1, you'll likely receieve more and stronger opposition. Seriously, you should improve it.  +++$+++ *I strongly suggest that you improve upon question 1. Whatever you do though, ''don't'' reword your original answer. Instead, write an expanded answer ''underneath'' your original answer to question 1. If you don't add an expanded answer to question 1, you'll likely receieve more and stronger opposition. Seriously, you should improve it. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
612033 +++$+++ 3bulletproof16 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 612032 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.187926260E09 +++$+++ Seriously, try to improve that first answer. What can an admin do other than stopping vandals? Really, is that the only thing admins do around here? Talk about what you'll do with AfDs or RfDs or other stuff like problems on the admin noticeboard. Try to really get into detail with what actions you'll take. --  +++$+++ ::Seriously, try to improve that first answer. What can an admin do other than stopping vandals? Really, is that the only thing admins do around here? Talk about what you'll do with AfDs or RfDs or other stuff like problems on the admin noticeboard. Try to really get into detail with what actions you'll take. -- [[User:3bulletproof16|<font color="blue">'''bullet'''</font><font color="green">'''proof'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:3bulletproof16|<font color="black">'''3:16'''</font>]]</sup> 20:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
612034 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 612033 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.187926800E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, everyone. I guess I'm just nervous and even kinda scared. Is that natural? Man, I hope it is... At first, I was so excited; now I'm questioning myself on whether I'm ready or not. \/\/  +++$+++ :::I'm sorry, everyone. I guess I'm just nervous and even kinda scared. Is that natural? Man, I hope it is... At first, I was so excited; now I'm questioning myself on whether I'm ready or not. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 20:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
612035 +++$+++ DBZROCKS +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 612034 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.187926980E09 +++$+++ Its natural, don't worry, Im with you all the way!  +++$+++ ::::Its natural, don't worry, Im with you all the way! [[User:DBZROCKS|<font color="orange">'''''DBZROCKS''''']]</font><small>[[User talk:DBZROCKS|<font color="red">'''''Its over 9000!!!'''''</font>]]</small> 20:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
612036 +++$+++ 3bulletproof16 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 612035 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.187927220E09 +++$+++ I'd say it\u2019s quite natural to feel this way when an opportunity like this comes at you. Relax and really think before you answer to questions and comments. Show that you are responsible and really listening to what others say. Take their advice into consideration. Again, it would really help you if you would expand your first answer and talk about what I said in my comment above. --  +++$+++ :::::I'd say it’s quite natural to feel this way when an opportunity like this comes at you. Relax and really think before you answer to questions and comments. Show that you are responsible and really listening to what others say. Take their advice into consideration. Again, it would really help you if you would expand your first answer and talk about what I said in my comment above. -- [[User:3bulletproof16|<font color="blue">'''bullet'''</font><font color="green">'''proof'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:3bulletproof16|<font color="black">'''3:16'''</font>]]</sup> 20:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
612037 +++$+++ Durin +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.187927400E09 +++$+++ It is quite natural. PD, I don't think you're suited to be an admin and said as much in your RfA. But, if it fails don't take it hard. Being an admin isn't some lofty status symbol or anything. I voluntarily gave up my admin bit months ago, and I think it's the best decision I ever made on Wikipedia. Whatever the outcome, learn from the experience. In the meantime, stop stressing about it :) It really doesn't matter two grains of sand what happens to the RfA. -- +++$+++ *It is quite natural. PD, I don't think you're suited to be an admin and said as much in your RfA. But, if it fails don't take it hard. Being an admin isn't some lofty status symbol or anything. I voluntarily gave up my admin bit months ago, and I think it's the best decision I ever made on Wikipedia. Whatever the outcome, learn from the experience. In the meantime, stop stressing about it :) It really doesn't matter two grains of sand what happens to the RfA. --[[User:Durin|Durin]] 20:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
612038 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 612037 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.187927820E09 +++$+++ Thank, Durin. After having reviewed my edits and edit summaries myself, I honestly don't think I'm ready either. I want to give it a day or two longer for a chance of reassurance, but I don't think that'll happen. Also, I'm taking an oath right now to change my ways: no more [[WP:BITE|biting]], more discussing, and the like. *sighs* Oh well, there's always next year. \/\/  +++$+++ ::Thank, Durin. After having reviewed my edits and edit summaries myself, I honestly don't think I'm ready either. I want to give it a day or two longer for a chance of reassurance, but I don't think that'll happen. Also, I'm taking an oath right now to change my ways: no more [[WP:BITE|biting]], more discussing, and the like. *sighs* Oh well, there's always next year. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 20:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
612039 +++$+++ 3bulletproof16 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 612028 +++$+++ 612038 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.187928060E09 +++$+++ It doesn't even have to be a full year before you are nominated again. Learn from this and improve yourself like you just said and there's no doubt in my mind you'll be ready in no time. You are a great editor that I respect very much. Just kick back and relax here. What can you lose? On the contrary, you have much to gain. --  +++$+++ :::It doesn't even have to be a full year before you are nominated again. Learn from this and improve yourself like you just said and there's no doubt in my mind you'll be ready in no time. You are a great editor that I respect very much. Just kick back and relax here. What can you lose? On the contrary, you have much to gain. -- [[User:3bulletproof16|<font color="blue">'''bullet'''</font><font color="green">'''proof'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:3bulletproof16|<font color="black">'''3:16'''</font>]]</sup> 21:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

264298 +++$+++ Dark Kubrick +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264298 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-01 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.186027140E09 +++$+++ You've been doing a great job of working on and taking care of ''Jaws'', and I was impressed by your work on the sequels' pages. Thanks for reading this and all the great work you've done.-- +++$+++ You've been doing a great job of working on and taking care of ''Jaws'', and I was impressed by your work on the sequels' pages. Thanks for reading this and all the great work you've done.--[[User:Dark Kubrick|Dark Kubrick]] 20:59, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
264299 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264298 +++$+++ 264298 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.186506840E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I'm not ignoring you -- just been busy and away. I'll take a look at it. Don't get too obsessed with badges: they're just little badges, after all that no-one outside of the 'community' cares about. If you think that the FA you've worked on is better than the LotR, then take comfort in that. A FAR review might be an unfruitful exercise: our existence on this earth might be better spent elsewhere than the amateur politics of Wikipedia, especially for something as fighting over a badge.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I'm not ignoring you -- just been busy and away. I'll take a look at it. Don't get too obsessed with badges: they're just little badges, after all that no-one outside of the 'community' cares about. If you think that the FA you've worked on is better than the LotR, then take comfort in that. A FAR review might be an unfruitful exercise: our existence on this earth might be better spent elsewhere than the amateur politics of Wikipedia, especially for something as fighting over a badge. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
264300 +++$+++ Dark Kubrick +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264298 +++$+++ 264299 +++$+++ 2007-08-08 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.186639860E09 +++$+++ No problem. Actually, I've [[Wikipedia:featured article review\/The Lord of the Rings (1978 film)|already nominated it for FAR]]; guess I just couldn't wait. I appreciate your advice; my view of Wikipedia has definitely changed from before.-- +++$+++ ::No problem. Actually, I've [[Wikipedia:featured article review/The Lord of the Rings (1978 film)|already nominated it for FAR]]; guess I just couldn't wait. I appreciate your advice; my view of Wikipedia has definitely changed from before.--[[User:Dark Kubrick|Dark Kubrick]] 23:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

393575 +++$+++ Ned Scott +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311659580E09 +++$+++ So I guess I'm leaving this message for two reasons. One is to see if maybe you had any thoughts about it or advice, and two, incase I do bring this to some discussion, DR or not, I did not want you to take offense to it. --  +++$+++ So I guess I'm leaving this message for two reasons. One is to see if maybe you had any thoughts about it or advice, and two, incase I do bring this to some discussion, DR or not, I did not want you to take offense to it. -- [[User:Ned Scott|Ned Scott]] 22:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
393576 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393575 +++$+++ 393575 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311666660E09 +++$+++ I certainly wouldn't take any offense if you want to take it to DRV.  My reading of the discussion was basically that no one, including the creator, was arguing for it to be kept.  My personal suggestion would be to just use {{tld|wikia}}, if that works for you.  It's generally better to have fewer templates, since (1) it reduces the need to learn new syntax, and (2) reduces the work involved in maintaining multiple templates.  It sounds like what you really want is some sort of a decision regarding if the FG wiki violates ELNO.  If that is the case, then DRV really isn't the venue.  I would suggest instead starting a thread at [[WT:ELNO]] or a similar talk page.  Clearly, if we have templates like {{tld|wikia}}, then all external Wiki's probably don't violate ELNO.  Does that help?  Thanks!  +++$+++ : I certainly wouldn't take any offense if you want to take it to DRV.  My reading of the discussion was basically that no one, including the creator, was arguing for it to be kept.  My personal suggestion would be to just use {{tld|wikia}}, if that works for you.  It's generally better to have fewer templates, since (1) it reduces the need to learn new syntax, and (2) reduces the work involved in maintaining multiple templates.  It sounds like what you really want is some sort of a decision regarding if the FG wiki violates ELNO.  If that is the case, then DRV really isn't the venue.  I would suggest instead starting a thread at [[WT:ELNO]] or a similar talk page.  Clearly, if we have templates like {{tld|wikia}}, then all external Wiki's probably don't violate ELNO.  Does that help?  Thanks! [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 00:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

526444 +++$+++ Colin Keigher +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-24 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.167024960E09 +++$+++ Hey there. I noticed that you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Jc4646 had left a warning], but after looking at his contribs, I only see an edit to [[Elephant]]. Did he previously edit as an IP or something? :: <em> +++$+++ Hey there. I noticed that you [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jc4646 had left a warning], but after looking at his contribs, I only see an edit to [[Elephant]]. Did he previously edit as an IP or something? :: <em>[[User:Colin Keigher|Colin Keigher]]</em> <font color="red">'''([[User talk:Colin Keigher|Talk]])'''</font> 21:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
526445 +++$+++ Colin Keigher +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526444 +++$+++ 526444 +++$+++ 2006-12-25 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.167036240E09 +++$+++ Ah. That clarifies that for me. Thanks. :: <em> +++$+++ :Ah. That clarifies that for me. Thanks. :: <em>[[User:Colin Keigher|Colin Keigher]]</em> <font color="red">'''([[User talk:Colin Keigher|Talk]])'''</font> 00:44, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

526446 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-27 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.167217020E09 +++$+++ Hey buddy, come on over here:[[User:Marine 69-71\/Sandbox]].  I added some stuff and made some minor changes to your article.  I hope that you like it.  I won't make the changes unless you aprove it.   +++$+++ Hey buddy, come on over here:[[User:Marine 69-71/Sandbox]].  I added some stuff and made some minor changes to your article.  I hope that you like it.  I won't make the changes unless you aprove it.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
526447 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526446 +++$+++ 526446 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.167221340E09 +++$+++ Go ahead and take out the first paragraph and make what ever fixes you like. Cheers!  +++$+++ :Go ahead and take out the first paragraph and make what ever fixes you like. Cheers! [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
526448 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526446 +++$+++ 526447 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.167223620E09 +++$+++ I don't know, I just posted the article as it appears in NETA and added the link.  I wouldn't worry to much about it.   +++$+++ ::I don't know, I just posted the article as it appears in NETA and added the link.  I wouldn't worry to much about it.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

264303 +++$+++ CzechOut +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-13 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.186989480E09 +++$+++ I've renominated ''Yes Minister'' for FA.  When I read the archive, I was unconvinced it was clearly shouted down the last time.  And anyway, a year's passed since that last review.  I can't see anything seriously wrong with it now.  Maybe fresh eyes will give a more conclusive discussion this time around.  +++$+++ I've renominated ''Yes Minister'' for FA.  When I read the archive, I was unconvinced it was clearly shouted down the last time.  And anyway, a year's passed since that last review.  I can't see anything seriously wrong with it now.  Maybe fresh eyes will give a more conclusive discussion this time around. [[User:CzechOut|CzechOut]] 00:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
264304 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264303 +++$+++ 264303 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.187017020E09 +++$+++ OK. Well what is going to get opposition is that there are quite a few unreferenced sections. There are only about 20 refs, which seems few for a FA? And that's before the grammarphiliacs get to it!.  +++$+++ :OK. Well what is going to get opposition is that there are quite a few unreferenced sections. There are only about 20 refs, which seems few for a FA? And that's before the grammarphiliacs get to it!. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 07:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
264305 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264303 +++$+++ 264303 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.187016960E09 +++$+++ Cool. The instructions are at: [[Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries]]. The photographer should agree to the implications of the free license, hence that statement, and the email should be forward to the address in the next section: 'When permission is confirmed'. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Cool. The instructions are at: [[Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries]]. The photographer should agree to the implications of the free license, hence that statement, and the email should be forward to the address in the next section: 'When permission is confirmed'. Cheers. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 07:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

264307 +++$+++ Skatewalk +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264307 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-14 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.187124120E09 +++$+++ I believe in the originality of history and respecting other cultures, look at my edits. I never delete any work. I disagree with imposing Arabizing non Arabs. And ancient Arabia doesnt have anything to do with modern political Arabism!-- +++$+++ I believe in the originality of history and respecting other cultures, look at my edits. I never delete any work. I disagree with imposing Arabizing non Arabs. And ancient Arabia doesnt have anything to do with modern political Arabism!--[[User:Skatewalk|Skatewalk]] 13:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
264308 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264307 +++$+++ 264307 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.187143800E09 +++$+++ I must admit, I prefer simply 'Episodes'. The 'Guide' is probably redundant anyway.  +++$+++ :I must admit, I prefer simply 'Episodes'. The 'Guide' is probably redundant anyway. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:10, 14 August 2007(UTC)

453982 +++$+++ RL0919 +++$+++ Shadow1 +++$+++ 453982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.310275140E09 +++$+++ Following a [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)\/suspend sysop rights of inactive admins|community discussion]] in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard]] and the userright will be restored per the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Resysopping|re-sysopping process]] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> +++$+++ Following a [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/suspend sysop rights of inactive admins|community discussion]] in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard]] and the userright will be restored per the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Resysopping|re-sysopping process]] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->[[User:RL0919|RL0919]] ([[User talk:RL0919|talk]]) 22:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
453983 +++$+++ PrimeHunter +++$+++ PrimeHunter +++$+++ 453982 +++$+++ 453982 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.308203640E09 +++$+++ You have made a lot of edits and I haven't looked through all of them but your problem may be time zones. [[Template:Countdown]] says: \"the time on this countdown clock is GMT (UTC+0)\". See [[Greenwich Mean Time]]. I guess you are trying to use some American time zone instead.  +++$+++ :You have made a lot of edits and I haven't looked through all of them but your problem may be time zones. [[Template:Countdown]] says: "the time on this countdown clock is GMT (UTC+0)". See [[Greenwich Mean Time]]. I guess you are trying to use some American time zone instead. [[User:PrimeHunter|PrimeHunter]] ([[User talk:PrimeHunter#top|talk]]) 22:54, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
453984 +++$+++ Since 10.28.2010 +++$+++ PrimeHunter +++$+++ 453982 +++$+++ 453983 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.309504920E09 +++$+++ Got it. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Got it. Thanks. [[User:Since 10.28.2010| A comment by a person who has been editing Wikipedia since October 28, 2010.]] ([[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|talk]]) 00:22, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
453985 +++$+++ Since 10.28.2010 +++$+++ PrimeHunter +++$+++ 453982 +++$+++ 453984 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310954160E09 +++$+++ Just realized that this is me, thanks again, ''''' +++$+++ :::Just realized that this is me, thanks again, '''''[[User:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="gold">A</font>]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="gold">user who has been editing Wikipedia since Thursday, October 28, 2010.</font>]]''''' 18:56, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

264310 +++$+++ Skatewalk +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-15 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.187228340E09 +++$+++ The article was vandalized and merged to the wrong section, we couldn't restore it because it was protected. Can you please make sure the article is protected from further vandalism by [[User:EliasAlucard]] or his very close editing partner friend [[User:Dbachmann]]. -- +++$+++ The article was vandalized and merged to the wrong section, we couldn't restore it because it was protected. Can you please make sure the article is protected from further vandalism by [[User:EliasAlucard]] or his very close editing partner friend [[User:Dbachmann]]. --[[User:Skatewalk|Skatewalk]] 18:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
264311 +++$+++ Skatewalk +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264310 +++$+++ 264310 +++$+++ 2007-08-15 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.187240160E09 +++$+++ The article has 21 references and sources supporting it. Al you offered is an impressive reverting effort!-- +++$+++ *The article has 21 references and sources supporting it. Al you offered is an impressive reverting effort!--[[User:Skatewalk|Skatewalk]] 21:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
264312 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264310 +++$+++ 264311 +++$+++ 2007-08-15 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.187242680E09 +++$+++ This page should be protected by the way untill we all finish the discussions.  +++$+++ ::This page should be protected by the way untill we all finish the discussions. [[User:Ammar_shaker|<font face="Mistral" size="5" color="black">Ammar</font>]] (<sup>[[User_talk:Ammar_shaker|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]</sup> - <sup>[[Don't Talk|<font color="red">Don't Talk</font>]]</sup>) 22:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
264313 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264310 +++$+++ 264310 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.187670840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for this constructive comment. BTW, both \"I'm\" and \"can't\" have omissive (aka contractive) apostrophes. Also, \"I'm\" has a capital 'I'. Good luck at big school. ''(P.S. I'm fairly sure that you will \"check back.\" Hi!)''  +++$+++ :Thanks for this constructive comment. BTW, both "I'm" and "can't" have omissive (aka contractive) apostrophes. Also, "I'm" has a capital 'I'. Good luck at big school. ''(P.S. I'm fairly sure that you will "check back." Hi!)'' [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

393577 +++$+++ Lightmouse +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.311794580E09 +++$+++ You may be interested in the discussion at: [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Templates:_height_and_convert|mosnum: Templates: height and convert]]. Almost all instances of the height template with metric input now have output precision set to 1 inch. I think there may be undocumented consensus that 1 inch precision is fine for human height. The problem of fractions in non-human-height applications hasn't disappeared so your thoughts are welcome. Regards  +++$+++ You may be interested in the discussion at: [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Templates:_height_and_convert|mosnum: Templates: height and convert]]. Almost all instances of the height template with metric input now have output precision set to 1 inch. I think there may be undocumented consensus that 1 inch precision is fine for human height. The problem of fractions in non-human-height applications hasn't disappeared so your thoughts are welcome. Regards [[User:Lightmouse|Lightmouse]] ([[User talk:Lightmouse|talk]]) 12:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
393578 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ 393577 +++$+++ 393577 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.311977460E09 +++$+++ Okay, I will have a look.  I personally don't see the height template as being that bad, especially if we can just turn it into a simple frontend with some error checking.  The only problem with it is that editors then think there is a {{tld|weight}} template, which has had an entirely different meaning (undue weight).  +++$+++ : Okay, I will have a look.  I personally don't see the height template as being that bad, especially if we can just turn it into a simple frontend with some error checking.  The only problem with it is that editors then think there is a {{tld|weight}} template, which has had an entirely different meaning (undue weight). [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 15:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

526457 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-31 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.167633660E09 +++$+++ I already removed entry to make way for yours. I'll get it in next time. Thanks for helping out btw. =) ''' +++$+++ I already removed entry to make way for yours. I'll get it in next time. Thanks for helping out btw. =) '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 22:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
526458 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526457 +++$+++ 526457 +++$+++ 2006-12-31 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.167634800E09 +++$+++ By the way, I replied to your comments about one of my DYK suggestions.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Template_talk:Did_you_know#December_27] Tell me if you think it's fine now. ''' +++$+++ :By the way, I replied to your comments about one of my DYK suggestions.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Did_you_know#December_27] Tell me if you think it's fine now. '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 23:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
526459 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526457 +++$+++ 526458 +++$+++ 2007-01-01 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.167644880E09 +++$+++ Thanks, ERcheck. I like the new DYK better than the old one. It's now short and sweet. Happy New Year, btw. =) ''' +++$+++ ::Thanks, ERcheck. I like the new DYK better than the old one. It's now short and sweet. Happy New Year, btw. =) '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 01:48, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
526460 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526457 +++$+++ 526459 +++$+++ 2007-01-01 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.167647220E09 +++$+++ Check out [[T:DYKT#December_27]]. Tell me if you understand the wording of the entry. It's a great article, and I'd like to see it on DYK, but the wording's a wee bit off. Thanks for any help. ''' +++$+++ :::Check out [[T:DYKT#December_27]]. Tell me if you understand the wording of the entry. It's a great article, and I'd like to see it on DYK, but the wording's a wee bit off. Thanks for any help. '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 02:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

264314 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-26 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.188157200E09 +++$+++ Is it OK to have [[Template:itv.com]], or will it be removed?<br> +++$+++ Is it OK to have [[Template:itv.com]], or will it be removed?<br>[[User:GMc|<font color="#0099ff"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="#0099ff"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 12:40, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
264315 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264314 +++$+++ 264314 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.188155940E09 +++$+++ Mmm, I'm not sure. I guess we have similar templates for the IMDb and TV.com. I don't initially see a problem with this.  +++$+++ :Mmm, I'm not sure. I guess we have similar templates for the IMDb and TV.com. I don't initially see a problem with this. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:19, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
264316 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264314 +++$+++ 264315 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.188170820E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I just don't want to put it in all the articles with a page on itv.com, and then learn that the template will be deleted, after all the effort. :)<br> +++$+++ ::Thanks. I just don't want to put it in all the articles with a page on itv.com, and then learn that the template will be deleted, after all the effort. :)<br>[[User:GMc|<font color="#0099ff"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="#0099ff"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 16:27, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
264317 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264314 +++$+++ 264316 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.188184800E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I know what you mean. I'd do a few, and see what happens.  +++$+++ :::Yeah, I know what you mean. I'd do a few, and see what happens. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

526464 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-03 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.167813960E09 +++$+++ Hi, I saw you were removing the Infoplease references and replacing them with the United States Congress, since they are identical (and come from the US Congress). Do you want me to change all the Infoplease references in all my articles to US Congress only? I didn't want to have a whole bunch of lettered sections for one reference, so I chose to split them between Infoplease and US Congress. Thanks for any advice. ''' +++$+++ Hi, I saw you were removing the Infoplease references and replacing them with the United States Congress, since they are identical (and come from the US Congress). Do you want me to change all the Infoplease references in all my articles to US Congress only? I didn't want to have a whole bunch of lettered sections for one reference, so I chose to split them between Infoplease and US Congress. Thanks for any advice. '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 00:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
526465 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526464 +++$+++ 526464 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.167814860E09 +++$+++ Okay, done. =) ''' +++$+++ :Okay, done. =) '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 01:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

264321 +++$+++ Ugen64 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-29 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.188376320E09 +++$+++ Can you clarify why you deleted this article? I see you tagged it as [[WP:CSD|A3]] but that is \"no content whatsoever\" which is obviously untrue.  +++$+++ Can you clarify why you deleted this article? I see you tagged it as [[WP:CSD|A3]] but that is "no content whatsoever" which is obviously untrue. [[User:Ugen64|ugen64]] 01:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
264322 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264321 +++$+++ 264321 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.188401940E09 +++$+++ Because the obsessive vandal is back. I also don;'t see notability: change that to A7.  +++$+++ :Because the obsessive vandal is back. I also don;'t see notability: change that to A7. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

264324 +++$+++ Dalejenkins +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-31 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.188593520E09 +++$+++ Your comments have been addressed, please can you now decide wheter you shall '''support''' this article or not and update the table at the top of the article appropriately? <span style=\"font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ Your comments have been addressed, please can you now decide wheter you shall '''support''' this article or not and update the table at the top of the article appropriately? <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;">[[User:Dalejenkins|Dalejenkins]] | <small></small></span> 13:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
264325 +++$+++ Dalejenkins +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264324 +++$+++ 264324 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.188594600E09 +++$+++ {{done}} I have changed the FUR for the book image and removed the sub-paragraphs. <span style=\"font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ :{{done}} I have changed the FUR for the book image and removed the sub-paragraphs. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;">[[User:Dalejenkins|Dalejenkins]] | <small></small></span> 14:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
264326 +++$+++ Dalejenkins +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264324 +++$+++ 264325 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.188595560E09 +++$+++ {{done}} image removed. <span style=\"font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ ::{{done}} image removed. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;">[[User:Dalejenkins|Dalejenkins]] | <small></small></span> 14:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
264327 +++$+++ Dalejenkins +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264324 +++$+++ 264326 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.188598800E09 +++$+++ {{done}} I have expanded the second paragprah of the parodies section. <span style=\"font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ :::{{done}} I have expanded the second paragprah of the parodies section. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,Arial,Tahoma;">[[User:Dalejenkins|Dalejenkins]] | <small></small></span> 15:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

550002 +++$+++ Burgas00 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-11 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.152642660E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Burgas00|Burgas00]] 11:31, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
550003 +++$+++ HRE +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550002 +++$+++ 550002 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.152717120E09 +++$+++ I oversaw the whole process and I think you fall into the category of those who that this was just some sick joke of mine... -- +++$+++ :I oversaw the whole process and I think you fall into the category of those who that this was just some sick joke of mine... --[[User:HRE|HRE]] 08:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
550004 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550002 +++$+++ 550003 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 08:15:00 +++$+++ 1.152717300E09 +++$+++ Yes, quite. Because we have lots of gaps you failed to fill. But, don't worry, you know me, I'll change my mind as soon as you clear everything out... -- +++$+++ :: Yes, quite. Because we have lots of gaps you failed to fill. But, don't worry, you know me, I'll change my mind as soon as you clear everything out... --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 08:15, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
550005 +++$+++ HRE +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550002 +++$+++ 550003 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.152723600E09 +++$+++ Actually - you might just lend me a hand in that. I'm trying to make a [[User_talk:HRE|summary]] to actually understand what happened in the first place. -- +++$+++ :: Actually - you might just lend me a hand in that. I'm trying to make a [[User_talk:HRE|summary]] to actually understand what happened in the first place. --[[User:HRE|HRE]] 10:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

264329 +++$+++ ConoscoTutto +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264329 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-02 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.188796620E09 +++$+++ May I ask why you weren't courteous enough to contact me via my talk page to discuss the article I wrote about threequels before you deleted it? It's my understanding that there should have been some discussion about this matter first. You started one AFTER you deleted the article, which I don't appreciate. Thank you.  +++$+++ May I ask why you weren't courteous enough to contact me via my talk page to discuss the article I wrote about threequels before you deleted it? It's my understanding that there should have been some discussion about this matter first. You started one AFTER you deleted the article, which I don't appreciate. Thank you. [[User:ConoscoTutto|ConoscoTutto]] 22:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
264330 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264329 +++$+++ 264329 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.188835200E09 +++$+++ Hello. Yes, I apologise for non alerting you to the discussion. However, the article has not been deleted. It has been redirected. The difference is that it can still be accessed by anyone through the history section and reinstated if anyone wished to be bold. Chesrs.  +++$+++ :Hello. Yes, I apologise for non alerting you to the discussion. However, the article has not been deleted. It has been redirected. The difference is that it can still be accessed by anyone through the history section and reinstated if anyone wished to be bold. Chesrs. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
264331 +++$+++ ConoscoTutto +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264329 +++$+++ 264330 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.188856080E09 +++$+++ To access it through the history section, wouldn't one need to know it was there? How would one possibly know? And if you were \"bold\" enough to redirect the article, why can't you be \"bold\" enough to reverse the redirect? I am sure that in no time the term \"threequel\" will be as commonly known as the once non-existent term [[prequel]] is now. Thank you.  +++$+++ ::To access it through the history section, wouldn't one need to know it was there? How would one possibly know? And if you were "bold" enough to redirect the article, why can't you be "bold" enough to reverse the redirect? I am sure that in no time the term "threequel" will be as commonly known as the once non-existent term [[prequel]] is now. Thank you. [[User:ConoscoTutto|ConoscoTutto]] 14:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
264332 +++$+++ ConoscoTutto +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264329 +++$+++ 264331 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.188859680E09 +++$+++ P.S. I expanded the \"threequel\" section in the [[sequel]] article and added a reference. Please let me know if this is satisfactory. Thank you.  +++$+++ :::P.S. I expanded the "threequel" section in the [[sequel]] article and added a reference. Please let me know if this is satisfactory. Thank you. [[User:ConoscoTutto|ConoscoTutto]] 15:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
264333 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264329 +++$+++ 264331 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.188860940E09 +++$+++ That's right, and because of the freshness and lack of reliable references a brief mention within the sequel article is the best place for it, at best. One reference to an entertainment rag isn't good enough to justify an encyclopedic article, or, especially, changing the lead sections of multiple articles. If the term does become established and used in more credible publications (academic journals, or even more tabloids) then so be it. This reminds me of the name of amateur bands who posit that their article should be kept because one day they might be famous. I'm not sure the historical background you are providing is accurate and in relation: they are merely second sequels.  +++$+++ :::That's right, and because of the freshness and lack of reliable references a brief mention within the sequel article is the best place for it, at best. One reference to an entertainment rag isn't good enough to justify an encyclopedic article, or, especially, changing the lead sections of multiple articles. If the term does become established and used in more credible publications (academic journals, or even more tabloids) then so be it. This reminds me of the name of amateur bands who posit that their article should be kept because one day they might be famous. I'm not sure the historical background you are providing is accurate and in relation: they are merely second sequels. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
264334 +++$+++ ConoscoTutto +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264329 +++$+++ 264329 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.188861960E09 +++$+++ I'm glad we could arrive at a satisfactory compromise. As far as changing the lead sections of multiple articles, I was told long ago that new articles needed to be linked to older ones as much is possible, which is what I was doing. BTW, the term \"threequel\" is being used not only by \"entertainment rags\" such as ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' but has appeared in trade papers such as ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' and mainstream publications like the ''[[New York Times]]'', ''[[New York Magazine]]'', and even the ''[[Christian Science Monitor]]'', as well. Thank you.  +++$+++ :I'm glad we could arrive at a satisfactory compromise. As far as changing the lead sections of multiple articles, I was told long ago that new articles needed to be linked to older ones as much is possible, which is what I was doing. BTW, the term "threequel" is being used not only by "entertainment rags" such as ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' but has appeared in trade papers such as ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' and mainstream publications like the ''[[New York Times]]'', ''[[New York Magazine]]'', and even the ''[[Christian Science Monitor]]'', as well. Thank you. [[User:ConoscoTutto|ConoscoTutto]] 16:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

526474 +++$+++ Elfred +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526474 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-16 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.168946100E09 +++$+++ Is RuneScapeWiki not an encyclopedia also? Pages just like my \"Fooled You\" page are in RuneScapeWiki numerous times and whether you admit it or not, RuneScapeWiki is just the same as Wikipedia (not based on content). And anyway, all this \"patent nonsense\" crap doesn't matter. It doesn't take up your disk space, you can only access it from 1) my userpage, or 2) clicking \"Random article\" numerous times. So what's the problem?  +++$+++ Is RuneScapeWiki not an encyclopedia also? Pages just like my "Fooled You" page are in RuneScapeWiki numerous times and whether you admit it or not, RuneScapeWiki is just the same as Wikipedia (not based on content). And anyway, all this "patent nonsense" crap doesn't matter. It doesn't take up your disk space, you can only access it from 1) my userpage, or 2) clicking "Random article" numerous times. So what's the problem? [[User:Elfred|Elfred]] 03:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
526475 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526474 +++$+++ 526474 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.168978680E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia.  If you want to put \"fooled you\" pages somewhere, and it is ok on RuneScapeWiki, then put yours there.  [[WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_blog.2C_webspace_provider.2C_or_social_networking_site|Wikipedia is not a place of your personal fun]].  &mdash;  +++$+++ :Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia.  If you want to put "fooled you" pages somewhere, and it is ok on RuneScapeWiki, then put yours there.  [[WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_blog.2C_webspace_provider.2C_or_social_networking_site|Wikipedia is not a place of your personal fun]].  &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 12:18, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

506357 +++$+++ Adamdaley +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-25 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.293336900E09 +++$+++ I understand what you mean.  I would like to point out that it should start with the WikiProject sections, whatever the subject is to make the banner invalid when shortened to \"WP subject here\".  Yes, some do become invalid once shortened to \"WP subject here\".  That way, the \"users\" who are trying to make it appear to be \"WikiProject subject here\" much easier job.  It should not just be individuals being warned, it should be a \"global\" Wikipedia change to all WikiProject banners.  No offence is intended, only giving a valid reason why WikiProject can be shortened to \"WP\" and really it has nothing to do with me.  It's the \"WP subjects here\" and Wikipedia itself, otherwise why can they be shortened?  Feedback and a change in policy would be appreciated.  I do understand what you mean, honestly.  +++$+++ I understand what you mean.  I would like to point out that it should start with the WikiProject sections, whatever the subject is to make the banner invalid when shortened to "WP subject here".  Yes, some do become invalid once shortened to "WP subject here".  That way, the "users" who are trying to make it appear to be "WikiProject subject here" much easier job.  It should not just be individuals being warned, it should be a "global" Wikipedia change to all WikiProject banners.  No offence is intended, only giving a valid reason why WikiProject can be shortened to "WP" and really it has nothing to do with me.  It's the "WP subjects here" and Wikipedia itself, otherwise why can they be shortened?  Feedback and a change in policy would be appreciated.  I do understand what you mean, honestly. [[User:Adamdaley|Adamdaley]] ([[User talk:Adamdaley|talk]]) 20:15, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
506358 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506357 +++$+++ 506357 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.293337560E09 +++$+++ Im sorry I dont understand what your trying to accomplish by doing this. -- +++$+++ :Im sorry I dont understand what your trying to accomplish by doing this. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 20:26, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
506359 +++$+++ Adamdaley +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506357 +++$+++ 506358 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.293341400E09 +++$+++ Let's say that the \"Terrorism\" portal was (for example) \"WikiProject Terrorism|class=|importance=\" banner, why would they abbreviate it to \"WP Terrorism|class=|importance=\", if it should be the first stated example?  The second would be show up as invalid on a preview of the page before saving.  In my opinion, if the committee, board, adminstrators, council of Wikipedia is trying to make the \"WikiProject Terrorism|class=|importance=\" (example) for all portals or subjects covered, then shouldn't they and as well contributors (regular users) have their opinion heard?  +++$+++ ::Let's say that the "Terrorism" portal was (for example) "WikiProject Terrorism|class=|importance=" banner, why would they abbreviate it to "WP Terrorism|class=|importance=", if it should be the first stated example?  The second would be show up as invalid on a preview of the page before saving.  In my opinion, if the committee, board, adminstrators, council of Wikipedia is trying to make the "WikiProject Terrorism|class=|importance=" (example) for all portals or subjects covered, then shouldn't they and as well contributors (regular users) have their opinion heard? [[User:Adamdaley|Adamdaley]] ([[User talk:Adamdaley|talk]]) 21:30, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
506360 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506357 +++$+++ 506359 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.293349380E09 +++$+++ Im sorry I think your going to have to break this down Mr. Potato head style because I still do not understand what he point is.  -- +++$+++ :::Im sorry I think your going to have to break this down Mr. Potato head style because I still do not understand what he point is.  --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 23:43, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
506361 +++$+++ Magioladitis +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506357 +++$+++ 506360 +++$+++ 2010-12-26 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.293352800E09 +++$+++ Check [[User talk:Adamdaley|Adamdaley talk's page]]. --  +++$+++ ::::Check [[User talk:Adamdaley|Adamdaley talk's page]]. -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 00:40, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

526477 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.169122380E09 +++$+++ Man, am I gald to hear from you.  Long time.  I think that the Cavazos article is great!  You should nominate it for GA.  There is one question.  Are you sure that he is the first Hispanic to reach the rank of Bridgadier General in the Army? Check out these two guys: [[George Meade]], [[Luis R. Esteves]].  Tell me what you think.  +++$+++ Man, am I gald to hear from you.  Long time.  I think that the Cavazos article is great!  You should nominate it for GA.  There is one question.  Are you sure that he is the first Hispanic to reach the rank of Bridgadier General in the Army? Check out these two guys: [[George Meade]], [[Luis R. Esteves]].  Tell me what you think. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
526478 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526477 +++$+++ 526477 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.169213940E09 +++$+++ You know, I think you are right.  I thought that I had once read something about some Hispanic Californian being commisioned  a general during the Civil War, but I haven't found anything.  Therefore, Cavazos is the first.  I'm going to write an article about Puerto Ricans who have been awarded the Navy Cross and the Distinguished Service Cross.  These are heroes who are practically unknown.  I just finished writing about this Navy Cross recipient: [[Ramon Nunez-Juarez]].  Feel free to make any fixes.  +++$+++ *You know, I think you are right.  I thought that I had once read something about some Hispanic Californian being commisioned  a general during the Civil War, but I haven't found anything.  Therefore, Cavazos is the first.  I'm going to write an article about Puerto Ricans who have been awarded the Navy Cross and the Distinguished Service Cross.  These are heroes who are practically unknown.  I just finished writing about this Navy Cross recipient: [[Ramon Nunez-Juarez]].  Feel free to make any fixes. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 05:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

264335 +++$+++ Winklethorpe +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264335 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-05 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.189047360E09 +++$+++ Hi JPS, I'm unsure if you're the \"lead\" person on this FAC, or the nominator, but as you responded to my comments I'm just giving you a courtesy note: I'll be off wiki for at least all of next week, and looking at the age of the nom it may well get decided before I return and respond to any changes that get made. That said, I think it'll go through anyway, so I doubt having my support missing will have much effect :)  +++$+++ Hi JPS, I'm unsure if you're the "lead" person on this FAC, or the nominator, but as you responded to my comments I'm just giving you a courtesy note: I'll be off wiki for at least all of next week, and looking at the age of the nom it may well get decided before I return and respond to any changes that get made. That said, I think it'll go through anyway, so I doubt having my support missing will have much effect :) [[User:Winklethorpe|J.W<small>inklethorpe</small>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Winklethorpe|<small>talk</small>]]</sup> 19:56, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
264336 +++$+++ Winklethorpe +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264335 +++$+++ 264335 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.189228140E09 +++$+++ And the thanks you get for adding all the new material is...another set of comments :) Sorry about that. The new stuff really lifts the article, mind you.  +++$+++ :And the thanks you get for adding all the new material is...another set of comments :) Sorry about that. The new stuff really lifts the article, mind you. [[User:Winklethorpe|J.W<small>inklethorpe</small>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Winklethorpe|<small>talk</small>]]</sup> 22:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
264337 +++$+++ Winklethorpe +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264335 +++$+++ 264335 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.189229040E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry about the poor cat too. But he ''was'' rather bordering on total trivia :)  +++$+++ :I'm sorry about the poor cat too. But he ''was'' rather bordering on total trivia :) [[User:Winklethorpe|J.W<small>inklethorpe</small>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Winklethorpe|<small>talk</small>]]</sup> 22:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
264338 +++$+++ Winklethorpe +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264335 +++$+++ 264337 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.189653600E09 +++$+++ Congrats on the FA.  +++$+++ ::Congrats on the FA. [[User:Winklethorpe|J.W<small>inklethorpe</small>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Winklethorpe|<small>talk</small>]]</sup> 20:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

526480 +++$+++ Wilsbadkarma +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526480 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.169123160E09 +++$+++ Done, let me know if you need anything else [[User:Wilsbadkarma\/workpage]] &mdash;  +++$+++ Done, let me know if you need anything else [[User:Wilsbadkarma/workpage]] &mdash; [[User:Wilsbadkarma|<font color="#25185d">'''Wils'''</font><font color="#bc8d00">'''Bad'''</font><font color="#25185d">'''Karma'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Wilsbadkarma|<font color="#bb8900">'''Talk'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Wilsbadkarma|<font color="#bb8900">'''Contribs'''</font>]])</sup> 04:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
526481 +++$+++ Wilsbadkarma +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526480 +++$+++ 526480 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.169123640E09 +++$+++ I really like the workpage better granted I have changed my tune so many time I'm not sure if I get a say but I'm sticking with this one. Oh and your right the color your using on the portal page is too orange. &mdash;  +++$+++ :I really like the workpage better granted I have changed my tune so many time I'm not sure if I get a say but I'm sticking with this one. Oh and your right the color your using on the portal page is too orange. &mdash; [[User:Wilsbadkarma|<font color="#25185d">'''Wils'''</font><font color="#bc8d00">'''Bad'''</font><font color="#25185d">'''Karma'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Wilsbadkarma|<font color="#bb8900">'''Talk'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Wilsbadkarma|<font color="#bb8900">'''Contribs'''</font>]])</sup> 04:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
526482 +++$+++ Wilsbadkarma +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526480 +++$+++ 526480 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.169124000E09 +++$+++ You can't see the orange in the logo as bad, perhaps because it's surrounded with other colors and images, in fact you can't really see the orange in the header-box unless you compare it to a brighter fuller red, but thats not to say that the orange\/red is the best color, its not. You need to put the fullest brightest red on there and that would be the one on my workpage.&mdash;  +++$+++ :You can't see the orange in the logo as bad, perhaps because it's surrounded with other colors and images, in fact you can't really see the orange in the header-box unless you compare it to a brighter fuller red, but thats not to say that the orange/red is the best color, its not. You need to put the fullest brightest red on there and that would be the one on my workpage.&mdash; [[User:Wilsbadkarma|<font color="#25185d">'''Wils'''</font><font color="#bc8d00">'''Bad'''</font><font color="#25185d">'''Karma'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Wilsbadkarma|<font color="#bb8900">'''Talk'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Wilsbadkarma|<font color="#bb8900">'''Contribs'''</font>]])</sup> 04:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

264340 +++$+++ Mikay +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264340 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-09 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.189364400E09 +++$+++ Whereabouts are you from? -  +++$+++ Whereabouts are you from? - [[User:Mikay|<font color="green"><span style="font-variant:small-caps">ǀ<u> Mikay </u>ǀ</span></font>]] 12:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
264341 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264340 +++$+++ 264340 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.189541400E09 +++$+++ Hello! Yup, there's a few of us on here. I'm from [[:Category:Wikipedians in County Durham|Co. Durham]]. I won't spoil the fun of my pet stalkers and being more specific tho ;)  +++$+++ :Hello! Yup, there's a few of us on here. I'm from [[:Category:Wikipedians in County Durham|Co. Durham]]. I won't spoil the fun of my pet stalkers and being more specific tho ;) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
264342 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264340 +++$+++ 264340 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.189450140E09 +++$+++ Has the website had any significant press coverage?  +++$+++ :Has the website had any significant press coverage? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

262510 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-27 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.303947540E09 +++$+++ With regards to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Multiple_sclerosis&curid=50603&diff=426095572&oldid=425407882 this DOI], I have reported it to CrossRef. Not only has it been down for a long time, but it is also linked from the PubMed record, so this is bad.  +++$+++ With regards to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Multiple_sclerosis&curid=50603&diff=426095572&oldid=425407882 this DOI], I have reported it to CrossRef. Not only has it been down for a long time, but it is also linked from the PubMed record, so this is bad. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 16:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
262511 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262510 +++$+++ 262510 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.303948080E09 +++$+++ Cool, thanks. It's actually relatively (and unfortunately) common to have broken DOIs that are linked from PMID records, PDFs of the article, or other \"official\" sources.  +++$+++ :Cool, thanks. It's actually relatively (and unfortunately) common to have broken DOIs that are linked from PMID records, PDFs of the article, or other "official" sources. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 16:48, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

526486 +++$+++ Shaundakulbara +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-20 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.169300580E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I didn't mean to be re-editing right on your heels, but 90% if hooks need to be cut down, not built up.  In this case, \"after Texas became a state\" was just filler not needed.  Thanks.   +++$+++ Hi.  I didn't mean to be re-editing right on your heels, but 90% if hooks need to be cut down, not built up.  In this case, "after Texas became a state" was just filler not needed.  Thanks.  [[User:Shaundakulbara|Shaundakulbara]] 05:43, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
526487 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526486 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.169300760E09 +++$+++ Actually, I'd shortened the original hook quite a bit. &mdash;  +++$+++ :: Actually, I'd shortened the original hook quite a bit. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 05:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

264343 +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-11 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.189541100E09 +++$+++ This is mostly an FYI to you as an admin who still uses the old, templated method for salting pages.  That method of salting pages is depricated, and the template is now up for [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion\/Log\/2007 September 10#Template:Deletedpage|deletion]].  While things can still change, the current discussion definitely looks headed towards deletion.  Assuming that this happens, you will no longer be able to salt pages with the old method, and will need to begin using the newer salting method that involves cascading protection on the title, and allows recreation to be blocked while still having no article at the name, leaving it as a red link.  This new method of salting is centered at [[WP:PT]], and the instructions for how to make it work are there as well.  -  +++$+++ This is mostly an FYI to you as an admin who still uses the old, templated method for salting pages.  That method of salting pages is depricated, and the template is now up for [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 September 10#Template:Deletedpage|deletion]].  While things can still change, the current discussion definitely looks headed towards deletion.  Assuming that this happens, you will no longer be able to salt pages with the old method, and will need to begin using the newer salting method that involves cascading protection on the title, and allows recreation to be blocked while still having no article at the name, leaving it as a red link.  This new method of salting is centered at [[WP:PT]], and the instructions for how to make it work are there as well.  - [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] 13:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
264344 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264343 +++$+++ 264343 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.189616520E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia must not be used for advertising. You clearly have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]].  +++$+++ :Wikipedia must not be used for advertising. You clearly have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
264345 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264343 +++$+++ 264344 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 10:06:00 +++$+++ 1.189616760E09 +++$+++ Here's a compromise: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Gumtree]]  +++$+++ ::Here's a compromise: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gumtree]] [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

264346 +++$+++ Fosnez +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-12 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.189625220E09 +++$+++ Greetings, thankyou for your kind comments about the [[Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron|Article Rescue Squadron]]. Regarding your question, blantant advertisment is definatly against policy, and should be removed. Please have a read of the Rescue Squadron's project page and consider joining if you think you would like to help us :-)  +++$+++ Greetings, thankyou for your kind comments about the [[Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron|Article Rescue Squadron]]. Regarding your question, blantant advertisment is definatly against policy, and should be removed. Please have a read of the Rescue Squadron's project page and consider joining if you think you would like to help us :-) [[User:Fosnez|Fosnez]] 12:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
264347 +++$+++ Fosnez +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264346 +++$+++ 264346 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.189625460E09 +++$+++ Oh, by the way, I hope it wasn't too bold, but I non-admin closed the above AfD, is that ok?  +++$+++ :Oh, by the way, I hope it wasn't too bold, but I non-admin closed the above AfD, is that ok? [[User:Fosnez|Fosnez]] 12:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
264348 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264346 +++$+++ 264347 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.189638780E09 +++$+++ Hello. Yeah, I'll look into ARS more closely. Technically people involved in a discussion shouldn't close things regardless of their status (for instance, if I kept my delete vote, I wouldn't have been allowed to close it as delete). No harm done, though.  +++$+++ ::Hello. Yeah, I'll look into ARS more closely. Technically people involved in a discussion shouldn't close things regardless of their status (for instance, if I kept my delete vote, I wouldn't have been allowed to close it as delete). No harm done, though. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
264349 +++$+++ Fosnez +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264346 +++$+++ 264348 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.189659060E09 +++$+++ Greetings, I have had my understanding about Non-Admin closure enhanced by [[User:Tikiwont|Tikiwont]]. To this end, I will refrain from closing articles that I have commented on\/edit in the future, but I hold that according to SNOW I was still in the right here to close this one.  +++$+++ :::Greetings, I have had my understanding about Non-Admin closure enhanced by [[User:Tikiwont|Tikiwont]]. To this end, I will refrain from closing articles that I have commented on/edit in the future, but I hold that according to SNOW I was still in the right here to close this one. [[User:Fosnez|Fosnez]] 21:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
264350 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264346 +++$+++ 264346 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.189647240E09 +++$+++ Can you provide similar independent reliable third party sources for your organisation? Wikipedia is not to be used for advertising. In any case, i think it would be ineffective. I doubt that this article would rank highly in a Google search for classified ads.  +++$+++ :Can you provide similar independent reliable third party sources for your organisation? Wikipedia is not to be used for advertising. In any case, i think it would be ineffective. I doubt that this article would rank highly in a Google search for classified ads. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
264351 +++$+++ Fosnez +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264346 +++$+++ 264346 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.189654500E09 +++$+++ And finally, funny how you were able to infer that I must illiterate because I spelt something wrong, but wouldn't be able to understand from another one of my userboxes that I lived in [[Queensland]] and might not have responded because I was asleep.  +++$+++ *And finally, funny how you were able to infer that I must illiterate because I spelt something wrong, but wouldn't be able to understand from another one of my userboxes that I lived in [[Queensland]] and might not have responded because I was asleep. [[User:Fosnez|Fosnez]] 20:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
264352 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264346 +++$+++ 264346 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 08:31:00 +++$+++ 1.189697460E09 +++$+++ Because I have my own childish arguments to ignore. In my opinion, Fosnez has acted with civility, responding calmly to your unwarranted insults. Although he made an error in closing that AFD, it is not, despite your rhetoric, a crime. As he is not an admin, he has no \"power\" (though neither do admins, really, as we are all answerable to the project).  +++$+++ :Because I have my own childish arguments to ignore. In my opinion, Fosnez has acted with civility, responding calmly to your unwarranted insults. Although he made an error in closing that AFD, it is not, despite your rhetoric, a crime. As he is not an admin, he has no "power" (though neither do admins, really, as we are all answerable to the project). [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

526491 +++$+++ Chickyfuzz123 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-22 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.169465820E09 +++$+++ You have been on top of [[User:Toajaller3146]], who has been breaking the [[Wikipedia:three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] with the article [[Piner-Olivet Charter School]], to which he just broke the rule....again. Thought, I would tell you. Thanks much.  +++$+++ You have been on top of [[User:Toajaller3146]], who has been breaking the [[Wikipedia:three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] with the article [[Piner-Olivet Charter School]], to which he just broke the rule....again. Thought, I would tell you. Thanks much. [[User:Chickyfuzz123|Chickyfuzz123]]<sup>[[User talk:Chickyfuzz123|(user talk)]]</sup> 03:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
526492 +++$+++ Chickyfuzz123 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526491 +++$+++ 526491 +++$+++ 2007-01-22 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.169468340E09 +++$+++ Yeah, and [[User:Toajaller3146]] doesn't seem to get that you need to cite your sources, so I have kinda given up with the warnings to him. I've given him enough to know to stop reverting, but he seems to just ignore them. I'm the one that started the article, but it has just gone downhill and its too hard now to revert every little piece of \"gossip\" that goes into that article. If there is anything that you would want help with with cleaning up [[Piner-Olivet Charter School]], give me a call and I will be willing to help. Thanks for everything.  +++$+++ :Yeah, and [[User:Toajaller3146]] doesn't seem to get that you need to cite your sources, so I have kinda given up with the warnings to him. I've given him enough to know to stop reverting, but he seems to just ignore them. I'm the one that started the article, but it has just gone downhill and its too hard now to revert every little piece of "gossip" that goes into that article. If there is anything that you would want help with with cleaning up [[Piner-Olivet Charter School]], give me a call and I will be willing to help. Thanks for everything. [[User:Chickyfuzz123|Chickyfuzz123]]<sup>[[User talk:Chickyfuzz123|(user talk)]]</sup> 04:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

579619 +++$+++ Finngall +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ 579619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-08 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.181363880E09 +++$+++ Begging your pardon, but any claim of this guy being a major leaguer at this point is completely bogus.  At this point, he's a college pitcher who was drafted ''yesterday'' in the MLB draft and will not likely be a big-leaguer for a few years yet.  Please explain. -- +++$+++ Begging your pardon, but any claim of this guy being a major leaguer at this point is completely bogus.  At this point, he's a college pitcher who was drafted ''yesterday'' in the MLB draft and will not likely be a big-leaguer for a few years yet.  Please explain. --[[User:Finngall|<font color="green"><b>Finngall</b></font>]] [[User Talk:Finngall|<font color="#D4A017"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 21:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
579620 +++$+++ Finngall +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ 579619 +++$+++ 579619 +++$+++ 2007-06-08 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.181369580E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Nicholas Hagadone|AfD nomination]] submitted.  Thanks for the reply. -- +++$+++ :[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Hagadone|AfD nomination]] submitted.  Thanks for the reply. --[[User:Finngall|<font color="green"><b>Finngall</b></font>]] [[User Talk:Finngall|<font color="#D4A017"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 23:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

526493 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-22 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.169474460E09 +++$+++ |} &mdash;  +++$+++ |} &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 06:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
526494 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526493 +++$+++ 526493 +++$+++ 2007-01-22 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.169492460E09 +++$+++ Was Thomas in the first (non-famous) flag raising or the one Rosenthal one that became famous, which was actually the 2nd flag raising. I know the article says first, but a lot of people don't know there were two. Maybe the article should clarify this.   +++$+++ :Was Thomas in the first (non-famous) flag raising or the one Rosenthal one that became famous, which was actually the 2nd flag raising. I know the article says first, but a lot of people don't know there were two. Maybe the article should clarify this.  [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 11:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

264353 +++$+++ Stormin' Foreman +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.189822740E09 +++$+++ It's clear that [[Dead Like Me]] isnt quite up to GA standards yet, I would like to withdraw my nomination. Can that be done?  +++$+++ It's clear that [[Dead Like Me]] isnt quite up to GA standards yet, I would like to withdraw my nomination. Can that be done? [[User:Stormin' Foreman|Stormin&#39; Foreman]] 19:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
264354 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264353 +++$+++ 264353 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.189910760E09 +++$+++ Yeah, just remove it from the GAC page. I'll keep an eye on the article to see how you get on.  +++$+++ :Yeah, just remove it from the GAC page. I'll keep an eye on the article to see how you get on. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

502804 +++$+++ Cactus.man +++$+++ CBDunkerson +++$+++ 502804 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-17 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.150559760E09 +++$+++ Hi Conrad, unfortunately the DYK refresh clock seems to be off the rails again. If you could wave your magic wand over the bits and pieces once more, that would be great. Many thanks. --<font color=\"2B7A2B\"> +++$+++ Hi Conrad, unfortunately the DYK refresh clock seems to be off the rails again. If you could wave your magic wand over the bits and pieces once more, that would be great. Many thanks. --<font color="2B7A2B">[[User:Cactus.man|Cactus'''.'''man]]</font> <font size="4">[[User talk:Cactus.man|<span class="Unicode">&#9997;</span>]]</font> 08:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
502805 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ CBDunkerson +++$+++ 502804 +++$+++ 502804 +++$+++ 2006-06-17 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.150576320E09 +++$+++ For a bit more on this: [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Update_clock_issues_-__Template_talk:Did_you_know.23Refreshment_section.2C]] (last section at the moment of this message in case teh relative link doesn't work)... at least to me it appears to be a problem with preview and to be intermittent because I was able to get the clock to update. but I've seen it in preview be as much as 36 hours off from what it should be. I run FireFox 1.5 on win XP. Thanks for your efforts with this template, much appreciated, it is VERY handy. '''<font color=\"green\">[[User:Lar\/Esperanza|+]]<\/font>[[Special:Emailuser\/Lar|+]]''' +++$+++ :For a bit more on this: [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Update_clock_issues_-__Template_talk:Did_you_know.23Refreshment_section.2C]] (last section at the moment of this message in case teh relative link doesn't work)... at least to me it appears to be a problem with preview and to be intermittent because I was able to get the clock to update. but I've seen it in preview be as much as 36 hours off from what it should be. I run FireFox 1.5 on win XP. Thanks for your efforts with this template, much appreciated, it is VERY handy. '''<font color="green">[[User:Lar/Esperanza|+]]</font>[[Special:Emailuser/Lar|+]]'''[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 13:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

264355 +++$+++ Jusjih +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264355 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-17 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.190020800E09 +++$+++ As I see you making [[Stacey Sutton]] redirected to [[A View to a Kill]], some even less important bond girls do have their own articles.-- +++$+++ As I see you making [[Stacey Sutton]] redirected to [[A View to a Kill]], some even less important bond girls do have their own articles.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 02:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
264356 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264355 +++$+++ 264355 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.190046060E09 +++$+++ Yeah, it was a test so see how the Bond project reacts to [[WP:FICT]]. Once TTN and his cronies get on to it, all of them without so called \"real world information\" will be redirected. Attention was drawn to Sutton because of the GA nom: I'll leave others' to do the rather robotic task of redirecting the other articles, as I wouldn't want to deprive them of pleasure.  +++$+++ :Yeah, it was a test so see how the Bond project reacts to [[WP:FICT]]. Once TTN and his cronies get on to it, all of them without so called "real world information" will be redirected. Attention was drawn to Sutton because of the GA nom: I'll leave others' to do the rather robotic task of redirecting the other articles, as I wouldn't want to deprive them of pleasure. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
264357 +++$+++ Jusjih +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264355 +++$+++ 264356 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.190066760E09 +++$+++ If Stacy Sutton does not deserve its own article, I would like to suggest merging the content to [[List of James Bond allies in A View to a Kill]] to be more precise.-- +++$+++ ::If Stacy Sutton does not deserve its own article, I would like to suggest merging the content to [[List of James Bond allies in A View to a Kill]] to be more precise.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 15:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

2214 +++$+++ Skier Dude2 +++$+++ -Majestic- +++$+++ 2214 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-11 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.302520020E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of \"file\" pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Skier Dude2|Skier Dude2]] ([[User talk:Skier Dude2|talk]]) 04:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
2215 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2214 +++$+++ 2214 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.247359620E09 +++$+++ WP does not allow self promotion, OR, or linking to blogs. The post I put on your talk page should explain why I've reverted some of your edits.  +++$+++ :WP does not allow self promotion, OR, or linking to blogs. The post I put on your talk page should explain why I've reverted some of your edits. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 17:47, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

262513 +++$+++ Keithlaw +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262513 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-22 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.135290660E09 +++$+++ What a ludicrous deletion. Regardless, thanks for creating the new article. If I have time, maybe I'll add something to it. I think it's interesting that someone else asked for this material on [[Talk:Epilepsy]], but the request was ignored. The article's topic is \"Epilepsy,\" and any sort of epilepsy should be fair game for inclusion. |  +++$+++ What a ludicrous deletion. Regardless, thanks for creating the new article. If I have time, maybe I'll add something to it. I think it's interesting that someone else asked for this material on [[Talk:Epilepsy]], but the request was ignored. The article's topic is "Epilepsy," and any sort of epilepsy should be fair game for inclusion. | [[User:Keithlaw|Klaw]] <small>[[User talk:Keithlaw|¡digame!]]</small> 14:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
262514 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262513 +++$+++ 262513 +++$+++ 2006-01-16 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.137465420E09 +++$+++ re Driving & the UK - Hi, I've added the link to the DVLA site as I already had a note of it.  +++$+++ *re Driving & the UK - Hi, I've added the link to the DVLA site as I already had a note of it. [[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 18:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
262515 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262513 +++$+++ 262513 +++$+++ 2006-01-17 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.137499320E09 +++$+++ Sorry to so disrupt your edit :-)  Actually the DVLA website does clearly specify that it is the patients responsibility to inform them (see [http:\/\/www.dvla.gov.uk\/drivers\/dmed1.htm#4 Drivers Information page]) which in turn links to [http:\/\/www.dvla.gov.uk\/drivers\/dmed1_files\/group1.htm Medical Rules - Group 1 Licence Holders] and in turn to the dowloadable self declaration form re epilepsy [http:\/\/www.dvla.gov.uk\/drivers\/dmed1_files\/pdf\/ep1.pdf PDF form]. This is all quite a maze, and so I have added further information in Epilepsy's reference section - does this help?  +++$+++ *Sorry to so disrupt your edit :-)  Actually the DVLA website does clearly specify that it is the patients responsibility to inform them (see [http://www.dvla.gov.uk/drivers/dmed1.htm#4 Drivers Information page]) which in turn links to [http://www.dvla.gov.uk/drivers/dmed1_files/group1.htm Medical Rules - Group 1 Licence Holders] and in turn to the dowloadable self declaration form re epilepsy [http://www.dvla.gov.uk/drivers/dmed1_files/pdf/ep1.pdf PDF form]. This is all quite a maze, and so I have added further information in Epilepsy's reference section - does this help? [[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 04:02, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

2217 +++$+++ Green Giant +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-02 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.249254180E09 +++$+++ Hi there. You reverted one of my edits on [[Afghanistan]]. I just wanted to make clear I did not change the denonyms. What I changed was the reference. The reference note is set out in a very convoluted way with two references within it. It would be easier to include it as a straightforward reference. The actual citations were slightly incorrect in that they purport to quote a dictionary when they are actually quoting a website which quotes a dictionary.  +++$+++ Hi there. You reverted one of my edits on [[Afghanistan]]. I just wanted to make clear I did not change the denonyms. What I changed was the reference. The reference note is set out in a very convoluted way with two references within it. It would be easier to include it as a straightforward reference. The actual citations were slightly incorrect in that they purport to quote a dictionary when they are actually quoting a website which quotes a dictionary. [[User:Green Giant|Green Giant]] ([[User talk:Green Giant|talk]]) 16:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
2218 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2217 +++$+++ 2217 +++$+++ 2009-08-03 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.249298880E09 +++$+++ The only thing is that how the demonyms are handled was a very contentious issue a couple\/few years ago. The status quo has been stable for some time, and that is the only reason I reverted you. If you still want it your, admittedly simpler\/more straightforward, way, please revert me.  +++$+++ :The only thing is that how the demonyms are handled was a very contentious issue a couple/few years ago. The status quo has been stable for some time, and that is the only reason I reverted you. If you still want it your, admittedly simpler/more straightforward, way, please revert me. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 04:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
2219 +++$+++ Green Giant +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2217 +++$+++ 2218 +++$+++ 2009-08-03 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.249308360E09 +++$+++ I have changed back, but it's not really a reversion.  +++$+++ ::I have changed back, but it's not really a reversion. [[User:Green Giant|Green Giant]] ([[User talk:Green Giant|talk]]) 07:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
2220 +++$+++ Tajik +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2217 +++$+++ 2219 +++$+++ 2009-08-03 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.249322760E09 +++$+++ I have reverted Green Giant's edit and explained it on his talk page. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::: I have reverted Green Giant's edit and explained it on his talk page. Cheers. [[User:Tajik|Tajik]] ([[User talk:Tajik|talk]]) 11:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

497629 +++$+++ StuffOfInterest +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ 497629 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.165916280E09 +++$+++ I just noticed that you did a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Barack_Obama&curid=534366&diff=93712593&oldid=93712507 revert] on [[Barak Obama]] using what appears to be the rollback button.  Did you intend this as a vandalism revert or just an editorial one?  The fact the anonymous editor posted is actually true (it was on ABC news this evening) although it didn't provide a citation.  Using rollback is usually discouraged on editorial edits.  Just a friendly note. -- +++$+++ I just noticed that you did a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barack_Obama&curid=534366&diff=93712593&oldid=93712507 revert] on [[Barak Obama]] using what appears to be the rollback button.  Did you intend this as a vandalism revert or just an editorial one?  The fact the anonymous editor posted is actually true (it was on ABC news this evening) although it didn't provide a citation.  Using rollback is usually discouraged on editorial edits.  Just a friendly note. --[[User:StuffOfInterest|StuffOfInterest]] 01:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
497630 +++$+++ StuffOfInterest +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ 497629 +++$+++ 497629 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.165916880E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I don't disagree that the fact was trivial cruft.  My only concern was that a good faith edit was rolled back in a way that made it look like vandalism.  Thanks for your understanding.  Of course, right after your rollback the article got hit with some serious vandalism (replacing Obama with Osama). :) -- +++$+++ :Hi.  I don't disagree that the fact was trivial cruft.  My only concern was that a good faith edit was rolled back in a way that made it look like vandalism.  Thanks for your understanding.  Of course, right after your rollback the article got hit with some serious vandalism (replacing Obama with Osama). :) --[[User:StuffOfInterest|StuffOfInterest]] 01:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

264363 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264363 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-09 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.191915600E09 +++$+++ A user has decided to undo my merges of the three Rolling Stone (500 songs, 500 albums, 100 guitarists) lists because apparantly, I didn't merge them properly. Anyway, I discovered that 2 new pages have since been created - [[Rolling Stone's 100 Greatest Artists of All Time]] and [[Rolling Stone's 100 Greatest Albums of the 80s]]. There are no independant sources to prove their notability, and basically the articles are just a list of the Top 10, plus a bit of unsourced trivia and analysis. I think perhaps I should just nominate all five for deletion. What do you think? --  +++$+++ A user has decided to undo my merges of the three Rolling Stone (500 songs, 500 albums, 100 guitarists) lists because apparantly, I didn't merge them properly. Anyway, I discovered that 2 new pages have since been created - [[Rolling Stone's 100 Greatest Artists of All Time]] and [[Rolling Stone's 100 Greatest Albums of the 80s]]. There are no independant sources to prove their notability, and basically the articles are just a list of the Top 10, plus a bit of unsourced trivia and analysis. I think perhaps I should just nominate all five for deletion. What do you think? -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 00:40, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
264364 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264363 +++$+++ 264363 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.191945420E09 +++$+++ Yes, it would definitely be worth listing those for AFD. If someone doesn't contest the PRODs, then I'll delete them in five days -- otherwise, AFD.  +++$+++ :Yes, it would definitely be worth listing those for AFD. If someone doesn't contest the PRODs, then I'll delete them in five days -- otherwise, AFD. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
264365 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264363 +++$+++ 264364 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.191962820E09 +++$+++ What about the 500 songs and albums lists? Is it worth going to afd, or is it not worth it? --  +++$+++ ::What about the 500 songs and albums lists? Is it worth going to afd, or is it not worth it? -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 13:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
264366 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264363 +++$+++ 264365 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.191978120E09 +++$+++ I think they should all go to AFD.  +++$+++ :::I think they should all go to AFD. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
264367 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264363 +++$+++ 264366 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.191987720E09 +++$+++ Alright, I'll nominate the two of them for deletion. --  +++$+++ ::::Alright, I'll nominate the two of them for deletion. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 20:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

2222 +++$+++ TinucherianBot +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-05 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.249523880E09 +++$+++ <br>This newsletter is automatically delivered by --  +++$+++ <br>This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- [[User:TinucherianBot|'''<em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> Tinu</em>''']] [[User talk:TinucherianBot|'''<em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000">Cherian BOT </em>''']] - 18:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
2223 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2222 +++$+++ 2222 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.250651100E09 +++$+++ You do need to make it clear when you edit articles that you are replacing out-dated content with up-to-date sourced content. It is difficult to see the value of an edit that changes sourced content without explicitly explaining the situation. Thank you for the note, though. Cheers,  +++$+++ :You do need to make it clear when you edit articles that you are replacing out-dated content with up-to-date sourced content. It is difficult to see the value of an edit that changes sourced content without explicitly explaining the situation. Thank you for the note, though. Cheers, [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 20:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

2224 +++$+++ Andy Dingley +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-06 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.249607940E09 +++$+++ Sadly this does mean that those FreeIO redlinks were likely to stay that way forever, so it's a good wikiprune, but it is rather a shame that the FreeIO project seems to have ground to a halt since.   +++$+++ Sadly this does mean that those FreeIO redlinks were likely to stay that way forever, so it's a good wikiprune, but it is rather a shame that the FreeIO project seems to have ground to a halt since.  [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 18:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
2225 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2224 +++$+++ 2224 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.249608360E09 +++$+++ Well, I just assume, when someone adds nothing but information relating to a single company. If any of the links were actually going to become blue I wouldn't mind keeping them. But a new editor adding nothing but links and a \"reference\" about that single company... I doubt it.  +++$+++ :Well, I just assume, when someone adds nothing but information relating to a single company. If any of the links were actually going to become blue I wouldn't mind keeping them. But a new editor adding nothing but links and a "reference" about that single company... I doubt it. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 18:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
2226 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2224 +++$+++ 2224 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.250130360E09 +++$+++ Please see my response on your talk page.  +++$+++ :Please see my response on your talk page. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 19:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
2227 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2224 +++$+++ 2224 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.250135340E09 +++$+++ You can't. This is as far as this can go.  +++$+++ :You can't. This is as far as this can go. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 20:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

264370 +++$+++ WarioLoaf +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-18 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.192763160E09 +++$+++ I don't believe Lemon was ever a single ....... was it? --  +++$+++ I don't believe Lemon was ever a single ....... was it? -- [[User:WarioLoaf|WarioLoaf]] 20:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
264371 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264370 +++$+++ 264370 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.192763280E09 +++$+++ Hey. I think \"Lemon\" was a promotional single, but not released.  I don't have a record of it charting.  +++$+++ :Hey. I think "Lemon" was a promotional single, but not released.  I don't have a record of it charting. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

526515 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-04 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.170630240E09 +++$+++ The rule has not changed, but we have been backlogged lately, due to the lack of updating. I've been doing my normal twice-daily updates, but whenever I go back on the next day, I see DYK has not been updated for 10+ hours at a time (yesterday, it wasn't updated for 23 hours!). Hopefully, if we get more admins in Europe or other places to update, then we can fix the backlog issues. ''' +++$+++ The rule has not changed, but we have been backlogged lately, due to the lack of updating. I've been doing my normal twice-daily updates, but whenever I go back on the next day, I see DYK has not been updated for 10+ hours at a time (yesterday, it wasn't updated for 23 hours!). Hopefully, if we get more admins in Europe or other places to update, then we can fix the backlog issues. '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 15:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
526516 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526515 +++$+++ 526515 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.170631080E09 +++$+++ I don't think we can get past this backlog if we keep going back to items that are nearly 7-8 days old. Send Jan 28 + Jan 29 to expired, and add January 30th items. ''' +++$+++ :I don't think we can get past this backlog if we keep going back to items that are nearly 7-8 days old. Send Jan 28 + Jan 29 to expired, and add January 30th items. '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 15:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

2228 +++$+++ H1nkles +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-17 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.250547780E09 +++$+++ Hello, I see that you are taking on the clean up of this article in response to my GA Reassessment.  I'm going to extend the hold as I see that great progress is being made.  Please notify me when you are done so that I can finalize the review.  Thank you for your work on this important subject and overall for your work on Christian-related articles.  It is much-needed.   +++$+++ Hello, I see that you are taking on the clean up of this article in response to my GA Reassessment.  I'm going to extend the hold as I see that great progress is being made.  Please notify me when you are done so that I can finalize the review.  Thank you for your work on this important subject and overall for your work on Christian-related articles.  It is much-needed.  [[User:H1nkles|H1nkles]] ([[User talk:H1nkles|talk]]) 15:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
2229 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2228 +++$+++ 2228 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.250552460E09 +++$+++ Thank you, H1nkles. Honestly, I doubt it's going to make it to GA status. Pretty much all I've done is cut down on material; it probably needs things added. Sorry for the hold-up, I've just been really busy this week. I'll try and finish it in the next few days.  +++$+++ :Thank you, H1nkles. Honestly, I doubt it's going to make it to GA status. Pretty much all I've done is cut down on material; it probably needs things added. Sorry for the hold-up, I've just been really busy this week. I'll try and finish it in the next few days. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 16:41, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

526517 +++$+++ Camptown +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-04 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.170654360E09 +++$+++ The backlog has hampered the nomination process. And it would be very unfair for qualified nominations to be dismissed for less qualified nominations (some real borderliners) which I now return for further review.  +++$+++ The backlog has hampered the nomination process. And it would be very unfair for qualified nominations to be dismissed for less qualified nominations (some real borderliners) which I now return for further review. [[User:Camptown|Camptown]] 21:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
526518 +++$+++ Camptown +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526517 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.170654960E09 +++$+++ I only agree if ''better'' articles are chosen. The project doesn't benefit from unfair selections.  +++$+++ ::I only agree if ''better'' articles are chosen. The project doesn't benefit from unfair selections. [[User:Camptown|Camptown]] 21:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
526519 +++$+++ Camptown +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526517 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.170655320E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you added a couple of very short articles...  +++$+++ :::I noticed that you added a couple of very short articles... [[User:Camptown|Camptown]] 22:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
526520 +++$+++ Camptown +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526517 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.170655740E09 +++$+++ I've done some job in selecting articles, and I think that you can do your part of the job as an admin and update the articles that have been selected, instead of exchanging fine article for stubby articles (which are also more than 5 days old).  +++$+++ ::::I've done some job in selecting articles, and I think that you can do your part of the job as an admin and update the articles that have been selected, instead of exchanging fine article for stubby articles (which are also more than 5 days old). [[User:Camptown|Camptown]] 22:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
526521 +++$+++ Camptown +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526517 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.170655800E09 +++$+++ The Lily article is far too short to get the picture slot!!!!  +++$+++ :::::The Lily article is far too short to get the picture slot!!!! [[User:Camptown|Camptown]] 22:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
526522 +++$+++ Camptown +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526517 +++$+++ 526517 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.170656340E09 +++$+++ If you insist on the 5 day expiration rule - all articles from Jan 30 would have to go as well...  +++$+++ *If you insist on the 5 day expiration rule - all articles from Jan 30 would have to go as well... [[User:Camptown|Camptown]] 22:19, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
526523 +++$+++ Camptown +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526517 +++$+++ 526522 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.170657120E09 +++$+++ There has always been some abition in letting a longer article have the picture slot. As of now, the lily article doesn't belong to that group of articles. I know from history that many editors feel unfairly treated when their nominations are rejected because of a sudden tough application of a rule that hasn't been upheld because of a temporary backlog. The last thing this project needs is hard working editors who are unfairly treated. --  +++$+++ **There has always been some abition in letting a longer article have the picture slot. As of now, the lily article doesn't belong to that group of articles. I know from history that many editors feel unfairly treated when their nominations are rejected because of a sudden tough application of a rule that hasn't been upheld because of a temporary backlog. The last thing this project needs is hard working editors who are unfairly treated. -- [[User:Camptown|Camptown]] 22:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

264375 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-01 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.193931960E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 08:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
264376 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264375 +++$+++ 264375 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.193989260E09 +++$+++ Certainly can.  +++$+++ :Certainly can. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 00:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

2232 +++$+++ BennyK95 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Hello I just wanted to wish you an early Happy all Saints and all Souls day! May you have a blessed feast and God bless! -  +++$+++ Hello I just wanted to wish you an early Happy all Saints and all Souls day! May you have a blessed feast and God bless! - [[User:BennyK95|<font color="2f4f4f" size="2pt" face="Palatino Linotype">'''BennyK95'''</font>]] - [[User talk:BennyK95|<font color="1f5f1f"size="1pt" face="Arial">'''Talk'''</font>]] 17:02, October 25 2009 (UTC)
2233 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2232 +++$+++ 2232 +++$+++ 2009-10-31 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.257052800E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Benny, you too. I'll offer vespers tonight that you attain to sainthood.  +++$+++ :Thank you, Benny, you too. I'll offer vespers tonight that you attain to sainthood. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 22:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

264377 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-02 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.194058440E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you were the author of [[User:The JPS\/Director templates]], and I was wondering if you were aware if actor templates are opposed by the community or not.  I've had to clean up after [[Template:Leonardo DiCaprio]] and [[Template:Nicholson movies]], which list even the minor roles of their career.  I'm aware of actor templates being deleted, but I was wondering if you knew of a specific precedent in opposition to actor templates. \u2014 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you were the author of [[User:The JPS/Director templates]], and I was wondering if you were aware if actor templates are opposed by the community or not.  I've had to clean up after [[Template:Leonardo DiCaprio]] and [[Template:Nicholson movies]], which list even the minor roles of their career.  I'm aware of actor templates being deleted, but I was wondering if you knew of a specific precedent in opposition to actor templates. —[[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 19:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
264378 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264377 +++$+++ 264377 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.194060360E09 +++$+++ To be honest, I haven't been following it lately, I'm afraid. I guess the director templates are more acceptable as there's only going to be one template. However, for actors there are could be up to three per article, and it is quite POV to determine which actors are 'deserving' of them.  +++$+++ :To be honest, I haven't been following it lately, I'm afraid. I guess the director templates are more acceptable as there's only going to be one template. However, for actors there are could be up to three per article, and it is quite POV to determine which actors are 'deserving' of them. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:26, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

2234 +++$+++ Böri +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-01 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.267465860E09 +++$+++ ''It is generally accepted that the Emperor Julian was '''reburied''' in the Church of the Holy Apostles at Constantinople at some unknown date after his initial burial outside Tarsus in Cilicia in 363.''  +++$+++ ''It is generally accepted that the Emperor Julian was '''reburied''' in the Church of the Holy Apostles at Constantinople at some unknown date after his initial burial outside Tarsus in Cilicia in 363.'' [[User:Böri|Böri]] ([[User talk:Böri|talk]]) 09:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
2235 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.267945020E09 +++$+++ The point of the post is unclear. Talk pages should be used only to discuss improving the article.  +++$+++ :The point of the post is unclear. Talk pages should be used only to discuss improving the article. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 22:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
2236 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.269817680E09 +++$+++ My comment was in reference to edits made on [[Mango]] and [[Manila galleon]] which were unsourced and did not improve the pages. The edits were made 25 March 2009; so over a year ago. Because the edits were so long ago, and you're on an IP address, they were probably made by another person than yourself. To avoid instances like this in the future, I would suggest getting an account here. I'll put a welcome message on your page that will tell you how to go about doing that. Tien un buen dia.  +++$+++ :My comment was in reference to edits made on [[Mango]] and [[Manila galleon]] which were unsourced and did not improve the pages. The edits were made 25 March 2009; so over a year ago. Because the edits were so long ago, and you're on an IP address, they were probably made by another person than yourself. To avoid instances like this in the future, I would suggest getting an account here. I'll put a welcome message on your page that will tell you how to go about doing that. Tien un buen dia. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 16:08, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
2237 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ 2010-07-10 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.278817860E09 +++$+++ Please see the comments other editors have have posted regarding your additions. You're standing alone against two experienced editors, one of whom is an admin. Which of us do you think better understands WP policy?  +++$+++ :Please see the comments other editors have have posted regarding your additions. You're standing alone against two experienced editors, one of whom is an admin. Which of us do you think better understands WP policy? [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 20:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
2238 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.280283000E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the mix up, have a nice day.  +++$+++ :Sorry for the mix up, have a nice day. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 19:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
2239 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ 2010-07-14 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.279147260E09 +++$+++ One external link in the EL section would be fine; but multiple links to the same base website in the body of the article is the problem. We try to avoid ELs in the article body.  +++$+++ :One external link in the EL section would be fine; but multiple links to the same base website in the body of the article is the problem. We try to avoid ELs in the article body. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 15:41, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
2240 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ 2234 +++$+++ 2010-07-14 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.279147380E09 +++$+++ Your latest revision is fine; using an EL as a reference is ideal.  +++$+++ :Your latest revision is fine; using an EL as a reference is ideal. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 15:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

264379 +++$+++ Admitunit +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264379 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-03 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.194127800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Admitunit|Admitunit]] 15:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
264380 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264379 +++$+++ 264379 +++$+++ 2007-11-03 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.194128220E09 +++$+++ Hi! I've asked for extra thoughts at [[Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Template:University_of_Durham_and_similar]].  +++$+++ :Hi! I've asked for extra thoughts at [[Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Template:University_of_Durham_and_similar]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

584920 +++$+++ Geni +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-19 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.203479580E09 +++$+++ No. Back when I was an admin the tool I wanted was undo. I've got that now and I'm very happy with it. +++$+++ No. Back when I was an admin the tool I wanted was undo. I've got that now and I'm very happy with it.[[User:Geni|Geni]] 19:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
584921 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584920 +++$+++ 584920 +++$+++ 2008-02-19 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.203479760E09 +++$+++ That's fine then. I felt it was better to ask you than to just grant it.  +++$+++ :That's fine then. I felt it was better to ask you than to just grant it. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:56, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

264381 +++$+++ Daytona2 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.194486960E09 +++$+++ See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=M25_motorway&curid=20469&diff=169832322&oldid=169742431]. I assume you didn't mean [[WP:DAB]] ?  +++$+++ See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=M25_motorway&curid=20469&diff=169832322&oldid=169742431]. I assume you didn't mean [[WP:DAB]] ? [[User:Daytona2|-- John]] 17:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
264382 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264381 +++$+++ 264381 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.194767100E09 +++$+++ Sorry, this message got hidden amongst vandalism. Yeah, I meant DAB: the most important part of that edit was DABbing Radio 4.  +++$+++ :Sorry, this message got hidden amongst vandalism. Yeah, I meant DAB: the most important part of that edit was DABbing Radio 4. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
264383 +++$+++ Daytona2 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264381 +++$+++ 264382 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.195343820E09 +++$+++ Understood - thanks, I'd missed that when I looked. -- John <small>( +++$+++ ::Understood - thanks, I'd missed that when I looked. -- John <small>([[User:Daytona2|Daytona2]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:Daytona2|talk]])</small> 15:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
264384 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264381 +++$+++ 264381 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.195592400E09 +++$+++ It is better that you build it offline until it is in a suitable state for publication. Please also consider our notability guidelines: [[WP:CORP]]. Any 'developed' article might be deleted under such grounds.  +++$+++ :It is better that you build it offline until it is in a suitable state for publication. Please also consider our notability guidelines: [[WP:CORP]]. Any 'developed' article might be deleted under such grounds. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

526529 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526529 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.170930540E09 +++$+++ I personally oppose this move because these military decorations are only awarded om the United States and therefore cannot be confused with some other country's decoration.  I see no need for the move.  As a person who has been involved with United States military related artilces, I invite you to express your opinion here: [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion\/Speedy]]. Thank you,  +++$+++ I personally oppose this move because these military decorations are only awarded om the United States and therefore cannot be confused with some other country's decoration.  I see no need for the move.  As a person who has been involved with United States military related artilces, I invite you to express your opinion here: [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy]]. Thank you, [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
526530 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526529 +++$+++ 526529 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.170937020E09 +++$+++ My guess is that the person that made the nomination is not familiar with the military decorations of other countries and used the [[Distinguished Service Cross]] as an example.  +++$+++ *My guess is that the person that made the nomination is not familiar with the military decorations of other countries and used the [[Distinguished Service Cross]] as an example. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

2242 +++$+++ Lifebonzza +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-15 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.281885720E09 +++$+++ How's your suggestion coming along? :)  +++$+++ How's your suggestion coming along? :) [[User:Lifebonzza|Lifebonzza]] ([[User talk:Lifebonzza|talk]]) 08:22, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
2243 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2242 +++$+++ 2242 +++$+++ 2010-08-15 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.281913860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the the reminder, I will be getting around to it shortly. Please do nag me if I don't send you a link in the next few days.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the the reminder, I will be getting around to it shortly. Please do nag me if I don't send you a link in the next few days. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 16:11, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
2244 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2242 +++$+++ 2242 +++$+++ 2010-08-19 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.282201800E09 +++$+++ I've reverted it. You '''may not''' change text that is sourced. It has to be based on what the source says. You '''especially''' may not alter '''quoted''' text. What is the point of quoting a source if you change the quotation? If you want to have more discussion supporting Mosaic authorship, by all means add text to the article based on reliable sources.  +++$+++ :I've reverted it. You '''may not''' change text that is sourced. It has to be based on what the source says. You '''especially''' may not alter '''quoted''' text. What is the point of quoting a source if you change the quotation? If you want to have more discussion supporting Mosaic authorship, by all means add text to the article based on reliable sources. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 00:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
2245 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2242 +++$+++ 2242 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.282351500E09 +++$+++ Your comment on the page had no indication that you were suggesting an edit. You need to make your talk page comments unmistakeably about the article itself and not the topic of the article, so that other users will not mistake your comments for using the talk page as a forum.  +++$+++ :Your comment on the page had no indication that you were suggesting an edit. You need to make your talk page comments unmistakeably about the article itself and not the topic of the article, so that other users will not mistake your comments for using the talk page as a forum. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 17:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

264387 +++$+++ Sunderland06 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-24 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.195950060E09 +++$+++ Hi, would you say that [[A.F.C. Wimbledon]] should be a ga.-- +++$+++ Hi, would you say that [[A.F.C. Wimbledon]] should be a ga.--[[User:Sunderland06|Sunderland06]] ([[User talk:Sunderland06|talk]]) 16:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
264388 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264387 +++$+++ 264387 +++$+++ 2007-11-24 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.195950180E09 +++$+++ It looks well referenced (first hurdle) and I can't see any obvious problems. I'll leave it to someone more experienced in reviewing football articles on making the call tho'.  +++$+++ :It looks well referenced (first hurdle) and I can't see any obvious problems. I'll leave it to someone more experienced in reviewing football articles on making the call tho'. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

264389 +++$+++ 91.108.236.206 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-25 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.196024520E09 +++$+++ Perhaps we could discuss a truce? [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.236.206|91.108.236.206]] ( +++$+++ Perhaps we could discuss a truce? [[Special:Contributions/91.108.236.206|91.108.236.206]] ([[User talk:91.108.236.206|talk]]) 13:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
264390 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.196025600E09 +++$+++ It takes little effort from me to hit 'rollback', so I'm not quite sure what you'd like.  +++$+++ :It takes little effort from me to hit 'rollback', so I'm not quite sure what you'd like. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
264391 +++$+++ 91.108.236.206 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264390 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.196031360E09 +++$+++ That is very na\xefve of you John. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.236.206|91.108.236.206]] ( +++$+++ ::That is very naïve of you John. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.236.206|91.108.236.206]] ([[User talk:91.108.236.206|talk]]) 14:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
264392 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264391 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.196043480E09 +++$+++ ?  +++$+++ :::? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
264393 +++$+++ 91.108.209.88 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264392 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.196050380E09 +++$+++ It is very na\xefve for you to consider yourself in control here. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.209.88|91.108.209.88]] ( +++$+++ ::::It is very naïve for you to consider yourself in control here. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.209.88|91.108.209.88]] ([[User talk:91.108.209.88|talk]]) 20:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
264394 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264393 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.196055720E09 +++$+++ Would you like to elaborate? How are you empowering me exactly?  +++$+++ :::::Would you like to elaborate? How are you empowering me exactly? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
264395 +++$+++ 91.108.194.137 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264394 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.196057580E09 +++$+++ All I wish to add is that it is certainly a bold assumption on your part. Be that as it may would  you be willing to reach some form of compromise so that we might, say, put our differences aside? [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.194.137|91.108.194.137]] ( +++$+++ ::::::All I wish to add is that it is certainly a bold assumption on your part. Be that as it may would  you be willing to reach some form of compromise so that we might, say, put our differences aside? [[Special:Contributions/91.108.194.137|91.108.194.137]] ([[User talk:91.108.194.137|talk]]) 22:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
264396 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264395 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.196061780E09 +++$+++ And your suggestion might be?  +++$+++ :::::::And your suggestion might be? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:23, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
264397 +++$+++ 91.108.194.137 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264396 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.196062380E09 +++$+++ I tell you what, if you can permanently ban {{user|Gscshoyru}} for me, then I will be willing to end any harassment campaign against you. Maybe then can we coexist peacefully. Heck, I may even invite you round for afternoon tea and a civil chat. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.194.137|91.108.194.137]] ( +++$+++ ::::::::I tell you what, if you can permanently ban {{user|Gscshoyru}} for me, then I will be willing to end any harassment campaign against you. Maybe then can we coexist peacefully. Heck, I may even invite you round for afternoon tea and a civil chat. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.194.137|91.108.194.137]] ([[User talk:91.108.194.137|talk]]) 23:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
264398 +++$+++ JetLover +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.196068020E09 +++$+++ Ha, fat chance. <span style=\"font-family:Arial;color:blue\"> '''''Cheers,[[User:JetLover|Je]][[User talk:JetLover|t]][[Special:Contributions\/JetLover|Lover]] ( +++$+++ ::::::::::Ha, fat chance. <span style="font-family:Arial;color:blue"> '''''Cheers,[[User:JetLover|Je]][[User talk:JetLover|t]][[Special:Contributions/JetLover|Lover]] ([[User:JetLover/False reverts|Report a mistake]])'''''</span> 01:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264399 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.196069280E09 +++$+++ So ending the harassment is the only thing you have to offer me?  +++$+++ ::::::::::So ending the harassment is the only thing you have to offer me? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 01:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264400 +++$+++ 91.108.202.199 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.196106120E09 +++$+++ I thought I was being reasonable John, I could have asked for much more. Underestimating me could be your downfall here. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ( +++$+++ :::::::::::I thought I was being reasonable John, I could have asked for much more. Underestimating me could be your downfall here. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ([[User talk:91.108.202.199|talk]]) 11:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264401 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.196107140E09 +++$+++ You've given me no reason to believe you.  +++$+++ ::::::::::::You've given me no reason to believe you. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264402 +++$+++ 91.108.202.199 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.196107740E09 +++$+++ I admit it is a little difficult to explain. Perhaps we could meet over lunch to discuss this in person? [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ( +++$+++ :::::::::::::I admit it is a little difficult to explain. Perhaps we could meet over lunch to discuss this in person? [[Special:Contributions/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ([[User talk:91.108.202.199|talk]]) 12:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264403 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.196107860E09 +++$+++ Where would you like to meet? Somewhere public, obviously.  +++$+++ :Where would you like to meet? Somewhere public, obviously. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264404 +++$+++ 91.108.202.199 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264403 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.196108220E09 +++$+++ Naturally, I wouldn't have expected otherwise. Berwick seems like a good location to me. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ( +++$+++ ::Naturally, I wouldn't have expected otherwise. Berwick seems like a good location to me. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ([[User talk:91.108.202.199|talk]]) 12:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264405 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264404 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.196109240E09 +++$+++ Why Berwick?  +++$+++ :::Why Berwick? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264406 +++$+++ 91.108.202.199 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264405 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.196111400E09 +++$+++ Well I thought perhaps a short drive up the A1 might be convenient for you, plus I myself have never been there. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ( +++$+++ ::::Well I thought perhaps a short drive up the A1 might be convenient for you, plus I myself have never been there. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ([[User talk:91.108.202.199|talk]]) 13:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264407 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264406 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.196112000E09 +++$+++ Sorry, too inconvenient, considering you've been very vague what might be in it for me. Since you seem to know a lot about me, just come to the reception of the building where I work.  +++$+++ :::::Sorry, too inconvenient, considering you've been very vague what might be in it for me. Since you seem to know a lot about me, just come to the reception of the building where I work. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264408 +++$+++ 91.108.202.199 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264407 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.196113020E09 +++$+++ Very well then if you'd prefer things this way. If you are not interested in a truce though, and would prefer the harassment and protection of your talk page to continue, then I suppose we can allow things to continue in such a manner. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ( +++$+++ ::::::Very well then if you'd prefer things this way. If you are not interested in a truce though, and would prefer the harassment and protection of your talk page to continue, then I suppose we can allow things to continue in such a manner. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ([[User talk:91.108.202.199|talk]]) 13:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264409 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264408 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.196115780E09 +++$+++ That's fine. Far less hassle than going up the A1. And it's less hassle for my colleagues and me to revert and protect than it is for you.  +++$+++ :::::::That's fine. Far less hassle than going up the A1. And it's less hassle for my colleagues and me to revert and protect than it is for you. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264410 +++$+++ 91.108.202.199 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264409 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.196117280E09 +++$+++ Yes but how much hassle would it cause you if I were to inform Wikipedia Review what you've been getting up to? [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ( +++$+++ ::::::::Yes but how much hassle would it cause you if I were to inform Wikipedia Review what you've been getting up to? [[Special:Contributions/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ([[User talk:91.108.202.199|talk]]) 14:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264411 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.196118540E09 +++$+++ Getting up to what exactly? Stop being vague.  +++$+++ :Getting up to what exactly? Stop being vague. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264412 +++$+++ 91.108.202.199 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264389 +++$+++ 264411 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.196120760E09 +++$+++ Well naturally there's [http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/world\/europe\/7033182.stm this], although some innocent canadian has been arrested so I think you've probably gotten away with that. I do know what else you've been doing though, and it would be foolish to let slip my advantage by revealing here my enlightenment. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ( +++$+++ ::Well naturally there's [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7033182.stm this], although some innocent canadian has been arrested so I think you've probably gotten away with that. I do know what else you've been doing though, and it would be foolish to let slip my advantage by revealing here my enlightenment. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ([[User talk:91.108.202.199|talk]]) 15:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

2246 +++$+++ Jojhutton +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2246 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-20 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.282364220E09 +++$+++ Please if you could explain, why was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Torah&diff=380024521&oldid=379922099 this] reverted as vandalism?-- +++$+++ Please if you could explain, why was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Torah&diff=380024521&oldid=379922099 this] reverted as vandalism?--[[User:Jojhutton|Jojhutton]] ([[User talk:Jojhutton|talk]]) 21:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
2247 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2246 +++$+++ 2246 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.282371120E09 +++$+++ Because the text is '''clearly''' a quotation from the Encyclopedia Judaica. You can't alter quoted text. Am I the only person who understands that?  +++$+++ :Because the text is '''clearly''' a quotation from the Encyclopedia Judaica. You can't alter quoted text. Am I the only person who understands that? [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 23:12, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
2248 +++$+++ Jojhutton +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2246 +++$+++ 2247 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.282372200E09 +++$+++ The phrase ''\"However, Deuteronomy 31:9 (\"And Moses wrote this (Torah) law, and delivered it unto the priests the sons of Levi...\") contains an anachronism.\"'', is directly quoted from the Torah? Where?-- +++$+++ ::The phrase ''"However, Deuteronomy 31:9 ("And Moses wrote this (Torah) law, and delivered it unto the priests the sons of Levi...") contains an anachronism."'', is directly quoted from the Torah? Where?--[[User:Jojhutton|Jojhutton]] ([[User talk:Jojhutton|talk]]) 23:30, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
2249 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2246 +++$+++ 2248 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.282372560E09 +++$+++ I said, it's a quotation from the Encyclopedia Judaica.  +++$+++ :::I said, it's a quotation from the Encyclopedia Judaica. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 23:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
2250 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2246 +++$+++ 2248 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.282372740E09 +++$+++ Why don't you take the time to read the paragraph? Everything from \"The traditional doctrine\" to \"the narrative material\" is a quote from: Sarna, Nahum M. et al. \"Bible.\" Encyclopaedia Judaica. Ed. Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik. Vol. 3. 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2007. p576-679.  +++$+++ :::Why don't you take the time to read the paragraph? Everything from "The traditional doctrine" to "the narrative material" is a quote from: Sarna, Nahum M. et al. "Bible." Encyclopaedia Judaica. Ed. Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik. Vol. 3. 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2007. p576-679. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 23:39, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
2251 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2246 +++$+++ 2248 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.282372980E09 +++$+++ Do not alter my warnings on a third user's talk page. I informed him above on his page that he was altering a quote, and that he may not. That was his friendly, non-automated warning. He persisted in the edit following my explanation, which exhausted my assumption of good faith.  +++$+++ :::Do not alter my warnings on a third user's talk page. I informed him above on his page that he was altering a quote, and that he may not. That was his friendly, non-automated warning. He persisted in the edit following my explanation, which exhausted my assumption of good faith. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 23:43, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
2252 +++$+++ Jojhutton +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2246 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-21 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.282374000E09 +++$+++ As far as the altering goes, I did not alter your message, I only closed the section. Anyone who wishes to see it, still can. As far as the quotation goes, I have no way of verifying the quote, but I now see the \"quotation marks\" around the entire quote. Quotations that large should really be blocked and separate, so as to be not confusing to the reader, as this has apparently been. So I was wrong about the inline citation, but please try and be more kind to newbies, and do not remove talk page comments as you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:War_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80%93present)&diff=379962913&oldid=379930806 here]. -- +++$+++ :::::As far as the altering goes, I did not alter your message, I only closed the section. Anyone who wishes to see it, still can. As far as the quotation goes, I have no way of verifying the quote, but I now see the "quotation marks" around the entire quote. Quotations that large should really be blocked and separate, so as to be not confusing to the reader, as this has apparently been. So I was wrong about the inline citation, but please try and be more kind to newbies, and do not remove talk page comments as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:War_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80%93present)&diff=379962913&oldid=379930806 here]. --[[User:Jojhutton|Jojhutton]] ([[User talk:Jojhutton|talk]]) 00:00, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
2253 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2246 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-21 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.282374360E09 +++$+++ I am nice to the newbies...I put a welcome template on Zachariah's page when he was an anon, and gave him a number of edits before giving him a vandalism warning. And it is hardly my fault that the user on War in Afghanistan couldn't articulate his comment in a way that made it clear he was aiming to improve the article and not just talk bout the War in Afghanistan. Perhaps you should have spent more time reading the article and looking at the recent edit history before assuming I was in the wrong at [[Torah]]. I don't plan to accept any advice from you, given that you can't be bothered to thoroughly look at a quotation.  +++$+++ ::::::I am nice to the newbies...I put a welcome template on Zachariah's page when he was an anon, and gave him a number of edits before giving him a vandalism warning. And it is hardly my fault that the user on War in Afghanistan couldn't articulate his comment in a way that made it clear he was aiming to improve the article and not just talk bout the War in Afghanistan. Perhaps you should have spent more time reading the article and looking at the recent edit history before assuming I was in the wrong at [[Torah]]. I don't plan to accept any advice from you, given that you can't be bothered to thoroughly look at a quotation. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 00:06, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

568353 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.148596380E09 +++$+++ The article was in the main article space rather than in the User space, so I transferred the data to the appropriate space, your userpage. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ The article was in the main article space rather than in the User space, so I transferred the data to the appropriate space, your userpage. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 15:33, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
568354 +++$+++ Chrislb +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568353 +++$+++ 568353 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 09:01:00 +++$+++ 1.149004860E09 +++$+++ re -- +++$+++ :re --[[User:Chrislb|chrislb]] [[User talk:Chrislb|问题]] 09:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
568355 +++$+++ Chrislb +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568353 +++$+++ 568353 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.149134280E09 +++$+++ Ok I tried to point it out to you. Could you please restore my user talk page, that was created in the wrong user space ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Talk%3ABenutzer%3AChrislb])? Didn't know it's so hard to understand. -- +++$+++ :Ok I tried to point it out to you. Could you please restore my user talk page, that was created in the wrong user space ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Talk%3ABenutzer%3AChrislb])? Didn't know it's so hard to understand. --[[User:Chrislb|chrislb]] [[User talk:Chrislb|问题]] 20:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

526537 +++$+++ Ozgod +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.171623600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments! Very helpful for me. I simply saw a random biography with no structure and quickly went in and formatted. I am learning that there are templates for certain biographies (just hard to find them sometimes!) -- +++$+++ Thanks for your comments! Very helpful for me. I simply saw a random biography with no structure and quickly went in and formatted. I am learning that there are templates for certain biographies (just hard to find them sometimes!) --[[User:Ozgod|Ozgod]] 03:00, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
526538 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526537 +++$+++ 526537 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.171659840E09 +++$+++ Responded on user talk page. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Responded on user talk page. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 13:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

526540 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526540 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-17 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.171720620E09 +++$+++ Your Talk page archive was getting vandalized from multiple sources in the past few hours, so I semi-protected it. --  +++$+++ Your Talk page archive was getting vandalized from multiple sources in the past few hours, so I semi-protected it. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 05:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
526541 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526540 +++$+++ 526540 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.171721400E09 +++$+++ On second thought, I semi-protected all of your Talk page archives because they were all getting hit. --  +++$+++ :On second thought, I semi-protected all of your Talk page archives because they were all getting hit. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 06:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
526542 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526540 +++$+++ 526541 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.171722360E09 +++$+++ Re [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=108791867&oldid=108543935 your message]: Yeah, he's making a mess.  Perhaps semi-protecting all of Looper5920's pages are in order, too?  It seems to be him and you that are his favorite targets. --  +++$+++ ::Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=108791867&oldid=108543935 your message]: Yeah, he's making a mess.  Perhaps semi-protecting all of Looper5920's pages are in order, too?  It seems to be him and you that are his favorite targets. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 06:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
526543 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526540 +++$+++ 526542 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.171723140E09 +++$+++ Re [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=108793816&oldid=108791867 your message]: No problem. =)  Everything has been semi-protected, I think. --  +++$+++ :::Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=108793816&oldid=108791867 your message]: No problem. =)  Everything has been semi-protected, I think. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 06:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

2255 +++$+++ DuncanCraig1949 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2255 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-30 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.283212860E09 +++$+++ Dear Carl, Thanks for looking at the link I inserted on the [[Passage Meditation]] page. You suggested that I put forward reasons for including the link on the article's Talk page... but before I do that, I wonder if you might be able to give me some help? There is already a lively discussion on that page about this deleted link, and what is confusing me is that Wikipedia has so many rules that for every rule that says you CANNOT do something there is another rule that says that you CAN do it. Easwaran's first words on the video are \"What you do through the practice of meditation is train your attention\". Since he's talking about the method of meditation described in the article, it seemed to me a highly relevant link which would add understanding to a non-trivial topic. I appreciate that wikipedia articles can't be a collection of all the links there are for a topic, but surely one link which throws quite a bit of light on the topic is justified? Would you be able to give me some indication of what I might do to make this link an acceptable addition to wikipedia? Thanks,  +++$+++ Dear Carl, Thanks for looking at the link I inserted on the [[Passage Meditation]] page. You suggested that I put forward reasons for including the link on the article's Talk page... but before I do that, I wonder if you might be able to give me some help? There is already a lively discussion on that page about this deleted link, and what is confusing me is that Wikipedia has so many rules that for every rule that says you CANNOT do something there is another rule that says that you CAN do it. Easwaran's first words on the video are "What you do through the practice of meditation is train your attention". Since he's talking about the method of meditation described in the article, it seemed to me a highly relevant link which would add understanding to a non-trivial topic. I appreciate that wikipedia articles can't be a collection of all the links there are for a topic, but surely one link which throws quite a bit of light on the topic is justified? Would you be able to give me some indication of what I might do to make this link an acceptable addition to wikipedia? Thanks, [[User:DuncanCraig1949|DuncanCraig1949]] ([[User talk:DuncanCraig1949|talk]]) 17:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
2256 +++$+++ DuncanCraig1949 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2255 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.283289600E09 +++$+++ Dear Carl, I have now added a suggestion to the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Passage_Meditation#External_links_to_videos Passage Meditation Talk Page]  +++$+++ ::Dear Carl, I have now added a suggestion to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Passage_Meditation#External_links_to_videos Passage Meditation Talk Page] [[User:DuncanCraig1949|DuncanCraig1949]] ([[User talk:DuncanCraig1949|talk]]) 14:20, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
2257 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2255 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.283383740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know about the thread, Duncan. I've replied.  +++$+++ :::Thanks for letting me know about the thread, Duncan. I've replied. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 16:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

2258 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-19 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.284963900E09 +++$+++ Hi, I saw [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Christianity#Christianity_articles_have_been_selected_for_the_Wikipedia_0.8_release]] and the articles seem randomly selected - at t best. It would be nice if you could give some ideas about the list. I am not sure if I managed to look at them all, but it really needs help. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, I saw [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Christianity#Christianity_articles_have_been_selected_for_the_Wikipedia_0.8_release]] and the articles seem randomly selected - at t best. It would be nice if you could give some ideas about the list. I am not sure if I managed to look at them all, but it really needs help. Thanks. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 23:25, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
2259 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2258 +++$+++ 2258 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.285026420E09 +++$+++ Do you want an assessment of the list? I'll look it over as soon as I have a block of time to devote to it.  +++$+++ :Do you want an assessment of the list? I'll look it over as soon as I have a block of time to devote to it. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 16:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
2260 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2258 +++$+++ 2259 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.285048560E09 +++$+++ Yes, if you could do that it would be nice. To me it was really non-representative of Christianity, e.g. items such as Trinity, Crucifixion, etc. were falling behind biographies of specific people and the list of Archbishops of Canterbury! So your ideas will be appreciated, so my view will not be the only one out there. That CD will go to lots of people I think. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Yes, if you could do that it would be nice. To me it was really non-representative of Christianity, e.g. items such as Trinity, Crucifixion, etc. were falling behind biographies of specific people and the list of Archbishops of Canterbury! So your ideas will be appreciated, so my view will not be the only one out there. That CD will go to lots of people I think. Thanks. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 22:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

2261 +++$+++ Efmcleanckm +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2261 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-20 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.287616800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Efmcleanckm|Efmcleanckm]] ([[User talk:Efmcleanckm|talk]]) 16:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
2262 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2261 +++$+++ 2261 +++$+++ 2010-10-21 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.287705120E09 +++$+++ As far as I can tell an English translation is not provided at the URL. The document itself is only available in Spanish, with a four-sentence paragraph describing it in English. Four sentences that are already covered by the article don't warrant this link's inclusion in the ELs.  +++$+++ :As far as I can tell an English translation is not provided at the URL. The document itself is only available in Spanish, with a four-sentence paragraph describing it in English. Four sentences that are already covered by the article don't warrant this link's inclusion in the ELs. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 16:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

2263 +++$+++ Someone65 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-31 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.293790800E09 +++$+++ May i ask why you made this revert [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Abrahamic_religions&diff=405096179&oldid=405090507 here] ? For your info there were 37 citations from reliable sources. All verifiable.  +++$+++ May i ask why you made this revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abrahamic_religions&diff=405096179&oldid=405090507 here] ? For your info there were 37 citations from reliable sources. All verifiable. [[User:Someone65|Someone65]] ([[User talk:Someone65|talk]]) 02:20, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
2264 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2263 +++$+++ 2263 +++$+++ 2010-12-31 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.293792720E09 +++$+++ It was already addressed in the talk page. 37 citations for one piece of information screams POV-pushing. Bahai is already included in the article as an Abrahamic religion, so there's no need to push the issue.  +++$+++ :It was already addressed in the talk page. 37 citations for one piece of information screams POV-pushing. Bahai is already included in the article as an Abrahamic religion, so there's no need to push the issue. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 02:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
2265 +++$+++ Someone65 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2263 +++$+++ 2264 +++$+++ 2010-12-31 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.293807600E09 +++$+++ Hey i saw you archive a talk page earlier. Could you archive my entire talk page for me please? I'm not sure how to do it. I would appreciate that a lot. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Hey i saw you archive a talk page earlier. Could you archive my entire talk page for me please? I'm not sure how to do it. I would appreciate that a lot. Thanks. [[User:Someone65|Someone65]] ([[User talk:Someone65|talk]]) 07:00, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
2266 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2263 +++$+++ 2265 +++$+++ 2010-12-31 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.293809220E09 +++$+++ No problem.  +++$+++ :::No problem. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 07:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
2267 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2263 +++$+++ 2263 +++$+++ 2010-12-31 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.293818460E09 +++$+++ CARL - you and the IP must both stop editing at the article today. Please, as I suspect any other Administrator would block you both.  +++$+++ :CARL - you and the IP must both stop editing at the article today. Please, as I suspect any other Administrator would block you both. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 10:01, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
2268 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2263 +++$+++ 2267 +++$+++ 2010-12-31 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.293845520E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the clemency.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for the clemency. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 17:32, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
2269 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2263 +++$+++ 2268 +++$+++ 2010-12-31 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.293851340E09 +++$+++ I'd hate to see anyone get blocked over this, it shouldn't be necessary. If there are problems tonight or tomorrow I'm sure they can be sorted as others are now watching the article (I brought it up on ANI and of course as you know it's at AfD). So please don't put yourself in harm's way.  +++$+++ :::I'd hate to see anyone get blocked over this, it shouldn't be necessary. If there are problems tonight or tomorrow I'm sure they can be sorted as others are now watching the article (I brought it up on ANI and of course as you know it's at AfD). So please don't put yourself in harm's way. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 19:09, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

526554 +++$+++ Spangineer +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-25 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.172407320E09 +++$+++ Hi; I've responded at [[Template talk:Did you know]] to your concern about notability of [[Hank Earl Carr]]; I'm not sure what you mean by it, given the works cited at the bottom of the page. -- +++$+++ Hi; I've responded at [[Template talk:Did you know]] to your concern about notability of [[Hank Earl Carr]]; I'm not sure what you mean by it, given the works cited at the bottom of the page. --[[User:Spangineer|Spangineer]]<sup>[[:wikisource:User:Spangineer|ws]]</sup>&nbsp;<small><font color="brown">[[User talk:Spangineer|(háblame)]]</font></small> 04:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
526555 +++$+++ Spangineer +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526554 +++$+++ 526554 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.172410020E09 +++$+++ Just added a sentence clarifying that; what do you think? -- +++$+++ :Just added a sentence clarifying that; what do you think? --[[User:Spangineer|Spangineer]]<sup>[[:wikisource:User:Spangineer|ws]]</sup>&nbsp;<small><font color="brown">[[User talk:Spangineer|(háblame)]]</font></small> 05:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
526556 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526554 +++$+++ 526555 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 06:08:00 +++$+++ 1.172412480E09 +++$+++ Responded user talk page.  (Very helpful change.) &mdash;  +++$+++ :: Responded user talk page.  (Very helpful change.) &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 06:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

264413 +++$+++ 91.108.202.199 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-26 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.196121300E09 +++$+++ The point is John, my offer still stands. If you can block said user for me, I shall go away, otherwise you shall have to continue reverting vandalism to your talk page. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ( +++$+++ The point is John, my offer still stands. If you can block said user for me, I shall go away, otherwise you shall have to continue reverting vandalism to your talk page. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ([[User talk:91.108.202.199|talk]]) 15:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264414 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264413 +++$+++ 264413 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.196122380E09 +++$+++ I have no intention of blocking any editor in good standing.  +++$+++ :I have no intention of blocking any editor in good standing. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264415 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264413 +++$+++ 264414 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.196122860E09 +++$+++ You would link your real life identity to your allegations if you have any conviction, and are a fan of accountability. Otherwise, I might have to contact my workplace's legal department, and then Orange.  +++$+++ ::You would link your real life identity to your allegations if you have any conviction, and are a fan of accountability. Otherwise, I might have to contact my workplace's legal department, and then Orange. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264416 +++$+++ 91.108.202.199 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264413 +++$+++ 264415 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.196123940E09 +++$+++ Fair enough then John, I see it shall be futile to contact Wikipedia Review, and therefore I shan't. I would like to take this opportunity to offer new terms for a truce. I will agree to end any campaign of vandalism on your talk page if in exchange you agree to block indefinitely {{user|Hailey C. Shannon}}. I believe this is far more reasonable, the user in question being far less established\/useful as far as editing this encyclopedia goes. In fact they are nothing more than a retarded and autistic teenage girl. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ( +++$+++ :::Fair enough then John, I see it shall be futile to contact Wikipedia Review, and therefore I shan't. I would like to take this opportunity to offer new terms for a truce. I will agree to end any campaign of vandalism on your talk page if in exchange you agree to block indefinitely {{user|Hailey C. Shannon}}. I believe this is far more reasonable, the user in question being far less established/useful as far as editing this encyclopedia goes. In fact they are nothing more than a retarded and autistic teenage girl. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.202.199|91.108.202.199]] ([[User talk:91.108.202.199|talk]]) 16:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264417 +++$+++ JetLover +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264413 +++$+++ 264416 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.196143560E09 +++$+++ My friend, you do realize that I have filed an abuse report on you, and that if you continue, your internet service provider will be notified of your nefarious actions? <span style=\"font-family:Arial;color:blue\"> '''''Cheers,[[User:JetLover|Je]][[User talk:JetLover|t]][[Special:Contributions\/JetLover|Lover]] ( +++$+++ ::::My friend, you do realize that I have filed an abuse report on you, and that if you continue, your internet service provider will be notified of your nefarious actions? <span style="font-family:Arial;color:blue"> '''''Cheers,[[User:JetLover|Je]][[User talk:JetLover|t]][[Special:Contributions/JetLover|Lover]] ([[User:JetLover/False reverts|Report a mistake]])'''''</span> 22:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
264418 +++$+++ 91.108.231.42 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264413 +++$+++ 264417 +++$+++ 2007-11-27 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.196151300E09 +++$+++ Yes I am quite well aware of that. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.231.42|91.108.231.42]] ( +++$+++ :::::Yes I am quite well aware of that. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.231.42|91.108.231.42]] ([[User talk:91.108.231.42|talk]]) 00:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
264419 +++$+++ JetLover +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264413 +++$+++ 264418 +++$+++ 2007-11-27 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.196151600E09 +++$+++ Alright, so if you keep this up, you'll be in a whole mess of trouble. <span style=\"font-family:Arial;color:blue\"> '''''Cheers,[[User:JetLover|Je]][[User talk:JetLover|t]][[Special:Contributions\/JetLover|Lover]] ( +++$+++ ::::::Alright, so if you keep this up, you'll be in a whole mess of trouble. <span style="font-family:Arial;color:blue"> '''''Cheers,[[User:JetLover|Je]][[User talk:JetLover|t]][[Special:Contributions/JetLover|Lover]] ([[User:JetLover/False reverts|Report a mistake]])'''''</span> 00:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
264420 +++$+++ 91.108.231.42 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264413 +++$+++ 264419 +++$+++ 2007-11-27 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.196154960E09 +++$+++ To be perfectly honest I feel I am being rather reasonable at the present moment. I am not currently engaged in vandalism, I am merely requesting the block of another user, one who in fact has previously been disruptive themselves. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.231.42|91.108.231.42]] ( +++$+++ :::::::To be perfectly honest I feel I am being rather reasonable at the present moment. I am not currently engaged in vandalism, I am merely requesting the block of another user, one who in fact has previously been disruptive themselves. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.231.42|91.108.231.42]] ([[User talk:91.108.231.42|talk]]) 01:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
264421 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264413 +++$+++ 264420 +++$+++ 2007-11-27 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.196155140E09 +++$+++ Do you have legitimate concerns? Are you able to cite examples? Are you able to express your concerns without resorting to immature personal attacks such as \"retarded and autistic?\"  +++$+++ ::::::::Do you have legitimate concerns? Are you able to cite examples? Are you able to express your concerns without resorting to immature personal attacks such as "retarded and autistic?" [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 01:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
264422 +++$+++ 91.108.231.42 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264413 +++$+++ 264421 +++$+++ 2007-11-27 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.196156040E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't describe those as \"personal attacks\" to be fair. If you see her user page, she quite clearly states that she is female and has asperger's syndrome, making her \"autistic\" and \"retarded\". My concerns regarding this user are purely based on these facts. You may though be interested to know that said user was banned from the Simple English Wiki a while ago, for her disruptive edits. [[Special:Contributions\/91.108.231.42|91.108.231.42]] ( +++$+++ :::::::::I wouldn't describe those as "personal attacks" to be fair. If you see her user page, she quite clearly states that she is female and has asperger's syndrome, making her "autistic" and "retarded". My concerns regarding this user are purely based on these facts. You may though be interested to know that said user was banned from the Simple English Wiki a while ago, for her disruptive edits. [[Special:Contributions/91.108.231.42|91.108.231.42]] ([[User talk:91.108.231.42|talk]]) 01:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
264423 +++$+++ JetLover +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264413 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-27 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.196161500E09 +++$+++ Perhaps, but it is just not done. By the way, JPS, perhaps we shouldn't [[WP:NOFEEDING|continue with this user?]] <span style=\"font-family:Arial;color:blue\"> '''''Cheers,[[User:JetLover|Je]][[User talk:JetLover|t]][[Special:Contributions\/JetLover|Lover]] ( +++$+++ ::::::::::::Perhaps, but it is just not done. By the way, JPS, perhaps we shouldn't [[WP:NOFEEDING|continue with this user?]] <span style="font-family:Arial;color:blue"> '''''Cheers,[[User:JetLover|Je]][[User talk:JetLover|t]][[Special:Contributions/JetLover|Lover]] ([[User:JetLover/False reverts|Report a mistake]])'''''</span> 03:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

2270 +++$+++ Someone65 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-31 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.293837480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that. I appreciate it  +++$+++ Thanks for that. I appreciate it [[User:Someone65|Someone65]] ([[User talk:Someone65|talk]]) 15:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
2271 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2270 +++$+++ 2270 +++$+++ 2010-12-31 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.293845280E09 +++$+++ No problem. I can do it again in the future as needed, or the archive box on your talk page should link to instructions.  +++$+++ :No problem. I can do it again in the future as needed, or the archive box on your talk page should link to instructions. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 17:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

515025 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515025 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-19 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.240183620E09 +++$+++ I haven't read over whatever it is that's troubling you, but please don't get discouraged or turn in your badge... You're an excellent mediator. Some folks (again, speaking from general principles here) just refuse to [[WP:STICK|drop the stick]] and there's little-to-nothing we admin folk can do... \u2013<font face=\"verdana\" color=\"black\"> +++$+++ I haven't read over whatever it is that's troubling you, but please don't get discouraged or turn in your badge... You're an excellent mediator. Some folks (again, speaking from general principles here) just refuse to [[WP:STICK|drop the stick]] and there's little-to-nothing we admin folk can do... –<font face="verdana" color="black">[[user:xeno|'''xeno''']]</font> [[user talk:xeno|<font color="black" face="verdana"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 16:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
515026 +++$+++ Ward20 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515025 +++$+++ 515025 +++$+++ 2009-04-19 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.240186620E09 +++$+++ I also have appreciated your efforts to help mediate some of the disputes here and without your involvement I might have stopped editing Wikipedia. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :I also have appreciated your efforts to help mediate some of the disputes here and without your involvement I might have stopped editing Wikipedia. Thanks again. [[User:Ward20|Ward20]] ([[User talk:Ward20|talk]]) 17:17, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

2274 +++$+++ Pvsalsedo +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-07 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.294409460E09 +++$+++ I would suggest you re-read the talk section I produced before pronouncing judgement on it but also check out the source document that I have referenced.  This is a web page by Kate Phizackerly which more fully explains, in genetic detail, the Hawass research and demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt, the flaws and the viable alternatives of that research.  I think after you examine that web-page, you may come to a better understanding and make a more productive contribution as to how to improve the article instead of suggesting, out of hand, that my talk section constitutes \"general\" discussion.  That, I'm afraid, is not making any kind of a positive contribution, whatsoever.  +++$+++ I would suggest you re-read the talk section I produced before pronouncing judgement on it but also check out the source document that I have referenced.  This is a web page by Kate Phizackerly which more fully explains, in genetic detail, the Hawass research and demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt, the flaws and the viable alternatives of that research.  I think after you examine that web-page, you may come to a better understanding and make a more productive contribution as to how to improve the article instead of suggesting, out of hand, that my talk section constitutes "general" discussion.  That, I'm afraid, is not making any kind of a positive contribution, whatsoever. [[User:Pvsalsedo|Pvsalsedo]] ([[User talk:Pvsalsedo|talk]]) 06:11, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
2275 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2274 +++$+++ 2274 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.294416300E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but the way you wrote your comment gave no indication that you wanted to fix the article. It read like a long rant about why someone's view on Tutankhamun is wrong. Please just be mindful to make your talk page post's unmistakeably related to improving the article.  +++$+++ :I'm sorry, but the way you wrote your comment gave no indication that you wanted to fix the article. It read like a long rant about why someone's view on Tutankhamun is wrong. Please just be mindful to make your talk page post's unmistakeably related to improving the article. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 08:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

2276 +++$+++ pbl1998 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-07 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.294463520E09 +++$+++ pbl1998-- +++$+++ pbl1998--[[User:Pbl1998|Pbl1998]] ([[User talk:Pbl1998|talk]]) 21:12, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
2277 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2276 +++$+++ 2276 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.294463640E09 +++$+++ I've explained on your talk page. Please do not edit Fee's page again until you have new information to add to it.  +++$+++ :I've explained on your talk page. Please do not edit Fee's page again until you have new information to add to it. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 21:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

2278 +++$+++ Someone65 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-30 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.296453540E09 +++$+++ Could u archive my page for me again please?  +++$+++ Could u archive my page for me again please? [[User:Someone65|Someone65]] ([[User talk:Someone65|talk]]) 21:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
2279 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2278 +++$+++ 2278 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.296554820E09 +++$+++ How much of it do you want archived? It's all fairly recent, and the page isn't too terribly big yet.  +++$+++ :How much of it do you want archived? It's all fairly recent, and the page isn't too terribly big yet. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 02:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
2280 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2278 +++$+++ 2278 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.300341660E09 +++$+++ How is it acceptable to replace sourced content with unsourced?  +++$+++ :How is it acceptable to replace sourced content with unsourced? [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 23:01, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
2281 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2278 +++$+++ 2278 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.300659360E09 +++$+++ Dr Kamran, I appreciate your desire for an accurate article about yourself on Wikipedia. That having been said, Manobe13 is not trying to achieve a laudable end by good means. Wikipedia is based on verifiability and being tied to reliable sources. Going from an lenghty article with 16 references, to a shorter article with 0 references, does not further the aims of Wikipedia. If there are ''specific'' things that are wrong in the article, Manobe13 should feel free to demonstrate, using reliable sources, why those things are not correct. Manobe13's characteristic as a single-purpose account does not speak well of his dedication to improving Wikipedia. His actions here suggest a certain point-of-view pushing on your behalf. Were he interested in improving Wikipedia, he would constructively engage on the article's talk page about particular details, and would be interested in more than just making you look good, Doctor Kamran. Please instruct him to desist from his current mode of action at the article.  +++$+++ :Dr Kamran, I appreciate your desire for an accurate article about yourself on Wikipedia. That having been said, Manobe13 is not trying to achieve a laudable end by good means. Wikipedia is based on verifiability and being tied to reliable sources. Going from an lenghty article with 16 references, to a shorter article with 0 references, does not further the aims of Wikipedia. If there are ''specific'' things that are wrong in the article, Manobe13 should feel free to demonstrate, using reliable sources, why those things are not correct. Manobe13's characteristic as a single-purpose account does not speak well of his dedication to improving Wikipedia. His actions here suggest a certain point-of-view pushing on your behalf. Were he interested in improving Wikipedia, he would constructively engage on the article's talk page about particular details, and would be interested in more than just making you look good, Doctor Kamran. Please instruct him to desist from his current mode of action at the article. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 15:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
2282 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2278 +++$+++ 2278 +++$+++ 2011-03-22 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.300825860E09 +++$+++ I have replied on the article's talk page.  +++$+++ :I have replied on the article's talk page. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 13:31, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

524668 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524668 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-30 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.196476800E09 +++$+++ Hi, AnonEMouse. I'm starting to add some of those spiffy \"This user is a member of...\" boxes to my page, and can't locate one for the Porn Project. Is there one?  +++$+++ Hi, AnonEMouse. I'm starting to add some of those spiffy "This user is a member of..." boxes to my page, and can't locate one for the Porn Project. Is there one? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
524669 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524668 +++$+++ 524668 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.196477100E09 +++$+++ Probably not. [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.]] apparently loves userboxes, and is a founding member, but I can't find one among the many on his page. If there were one, I would think he would have it. We could ask him, but I think that means there isn't one. \"An opportunity for the interested student\", I guess. But, um ... how shall I put this ... don't go too wild. :-). Especially with some of the images that Videmus Omnia has gotten to be released, the possibilities to really embarrass ourselves are definitely there. :-) -- +++$+++ : Probably not. [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.]] apparently loves userboxes, and is a founding member, but I can't find one among the many on his page. If there were one, I would think he would have it. We could ask him, but I think that means there isn't one. "An opportunity for the interested student", I guess. But, um ... how shall I put this ... don't go too wild. :-). Especially with some of the images that Videmus Omnia has gotten to be released, the possibilities to really embarrass ourselves are definitely there. :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
524670 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524668 +++$+++ 524669 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.196477400E09 +++$+++ Opportunity to embarrass ourselves? I'm your man! ... But no, my tastes are probably too arcane, and my graphic skills too limited for me to be up to the job. I'll stick it on my page when someone else comes up with one though. Cheers!  +++$+++ :: Opportunity to embarrass ourselves? I'm your man! ... But no, my tastes are probably too arcane, and my graphic skills too limited for me to be up to the job. I'll stick it on my page when someone else comes up with one though. Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

2283 +++$+++ A_F_K_When_Needed +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-26 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.301179800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your time,  +++$+++ Thanks for your time, [[User:A_F_K_When_Needed|A F K]] [[User_talk:A_F_K_When_Needed|When]] [[Special:Contributions/A_F_K_When_Needed|Needed]] 15:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
2284 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2283 +++$+++ 2283 +++$+++ 2011-03-26 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.301182920E09 +++$+++ I'll look into asking an admin about the IPs, and yes, I think it would be good to ask for (full) protection of the page. Thanks for helping me keep it from going down in quality.  +++$+++ :I'll look into asking an admin about the IPs, and yes, I think it would be good to ask for (full) protection of the page. Thanks for helping me keep it from going down in quality. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 16:42, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
2285 +++$+++ A_F_K_When_Needed +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2283 +++$+++ 2284 +++$+++ 2011-03-26 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.301186220E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ ::Regards, [[User:A_F_K_When_Needed|A F K]] [[User_talk:A_F_K_When_Needed|When]] [[Special:Contributions/A_F_K_When_Needed|Needed]] 17:37, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
2286 +++$+++ A_F_K_When_Needed +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2283 +++$+++ 2284 +++$+++ 2011-03-26 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.301204580E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_page_protection&action=historysubmit&diff=420843524&oldid=420843204 Just so you're aware, the page was fully protected for three days.]  +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_page_protection&action=historysubmit&diff=420843524&oldid=420843204 Just so you're aware, the page was fully protected for three days.] [[User:A_F_K_When_Needed|A F K]] [[User_talk:A_F_K_When_Needed|When]] [[Special:Contributions/A_F_K_When_Needed|Needed]] 22:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
2287 +++$+++ SamuelTheGhost +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2283 +++$+++ 2283 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.309629300E09 +++$+++ I've recently seen another, unrelated, case where one of the article's owners deleted a talk page comment simply because it attacked the whole approach taken by the article. I think the establishment of the right precedents is important.  +++$+++ *I've recently seen another, unrelated, case where one of the article's owners deleted a talk page comment simply because it attacked the whole approach taken by the article. I think the establishment of the right precedents is important. [[User:SamuelTheGhost|SamuelTheGhost]] ([[User talk:SamuelTheGhost|talk]]) 10:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
2288 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2283 +++$+++ 2287 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310626140E09 +++$+++ I firmly think the tone and manner of writing in the post demonstrated it was meant petulantly, and not trying to improve the article. I think that justifies removing it. I won't press the issue, though.  +++$+++ ::I firmly think the tone and manner of writing in the post demonstrated it was meant petulantly, and not trying to improve the article. I think that justifies removing it. I won't press the issue, though. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 23:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
2289 +++$+++ SamuelTheGhost +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2283 +++$+++ 2288 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.310657940E09 +++$+++ OK. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::OK. Thanks. [[User:SamuelTheGhost|SamuelTheGhost]] ([[User talk:SamuelTheGhost|talk]]) 08:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

526573 +++$+++ AlbertHerring +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-04 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.173002700E09 +++$+++ Sure thing - I'll have a look tonight or tomorrow and see what I can do with it. -- +++$+++ Sure thing - I'll have a look tonight or tomorrow and see what I can do with it. --[[User:AlbertHerring]] <sup>[[User_talk:AlbertHerring|Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!]]</sup> 02:05, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
526574 +++$+++ AlbertHerring +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526573 +++$+++ 526573 +++$+++ 2007-03-05 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.173081960E09 +++$+++ Excellent, thanks. -- +++$+++ :Excellent, thanks. --[[User:AlbertHerring]] <sup>[[User_talk:AlbertHerring|Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!]]</sup> 00:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

264430 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-01 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.199242680E09 +++$+++ Well, right now I don't have any other source other than I am in Fort Walton Beach right now and I was just at the site... It was still standing in May, and it is gone now. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette|talk]]) 18:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)C. Mark Sublette +++$+++ Well, right now I don't have any other source other than I am in Fort Walton Beach right now and I was just at the site... It was still standing in May, and it is gone now. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette|talk]]) 18:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)C. Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette|talk]]) 18:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
264431 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264430 +++$+++ 264430 +++$+++ 2008-01-02 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.199345220E09 +++$+++ Surely he has a profile on YouTube to satisfy the YouTubers? Seems like a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] is going on. And why is so much of this article censored?  +++$+++ :Surely he has a profile on YouTube to satisfy the YouTubers? Seems like a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] is going on. And why is so much of this article censored? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
264432 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264430 +++$+++ 264430 +++$+++ 2008-01-06 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.199681220E09 +++$+++ Facts must be backed up by reliable sources. The reference which I removed today was a forum post, which is NOT a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. It is acceptable to reference a DVD, so long as it is verifiable. You don't need to link to anything online, as the quote will be verifiable in the DVD.  +++$+++ :Facts must be backed up by reliable sources. The reference which I removed today was a forum post, which is NOT a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. It is acceptable to reference a DVD, so long as it is verifiable. You don't need to link to anything online, as the quote will be verifiable in the DVD. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
264433 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264430 +++$+++ 264430 +++$+++ 2008-01-06 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.199682780E09 +++$+++ I didn't remove the quote. I removed the inadequate reference. It would be bets to discuss this on the article's talk page. Stop, though, putting messages in the article itself, because that will piss off people.  +++$+++ :I didn't remove the quote. I removed the inadequate reference. It would be bets to discuss this on the article's talk page. Stop, though, putting messages in the article itself, because that will piss off people. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
264434 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264430 +++$+++ 264430 +++$+++ 2008-04-18 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.208565660E09 +++$+++ It's not illegal to download movies and vids under copyright in ?Sweden and Canada. Does that help?  +++$+++ :It's not illegal to download movies and vids under copyright in ?Sweden and Canada. Does that help? [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''TONY'''</font >]] [[User_talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 17:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

526577 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-04 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.173066960E09 +++$+++ The article was expanded from a stub-like state, but the expansion was not that drastic (only ~2x). I think it's fair to say it is ineligible. ''' +++$+++ The article was expanded from a stub-like state, but the expansion was not that drastic (only ~2x). I think it's fair to say it is ineligible. '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 19:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
526578 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526577 +++$+++ 526577 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.173067440E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'll do it. ''' +++$+++ :Okay, I'll do it. '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 20:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

2290 +++$+++ Jlrigamonti +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2290 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.311363420E09 +++$+++ I was just trying to clarify a sentence that seemed brutally awkward and slightly misleading, why did you revert the changes? I didn't mean to step on any toes.  +++$+++ I was just trying to clarify a sentence that seemed brutally awkward and slightly misleading, why did you revert the changes? I didn't mean to step on any toes. [[User:Jlrigamonti|Jlrigamonti]] ([[User talk:Jlrigamonti|talk]]) 12:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
2291 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2290 +++$+++ 2290 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311368280E09 +++$+++ I do hope this explains the process to your satisfaction, and let me know if I can be of any help.  +++$+++ :I do hope this explains the process to your satisfaction, and let me know if I can be of any help. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 13:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
2292 +++$+++ A Georgian +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2290 +++$+++ 2291 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311370140E09 +++$+++ I'm just a guilty by-stander here, but it might be helpful to have a phrase such as \"According to Burkett\" at the beginning of the section; a lay reader might indeed not be aware that Q is hypothetical, especially citing it along with Mark, which is not.  The cite is not in quotation marks; so I don't what latitude an editor has in such cases.  +++$+++ ::I'm just a guilty by-stander here, but it might be helpful to have a phrase such as "According to Burkett" at the beginning of the section; a lay reader might indeed not be aware that Q is hypothetical, especially citing it along with Mark, which is not.  The cite is not in quotation marks; so I don't what latitude an editor has in such cases. [[User:A Georgian|A Georgian]] ([[User talk:A Georgian|talk]]) 14:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
2293 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2290 +++$+++ 2292 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.311370560E09 +++$+++ Indeed, 'according to Burkett' is a good idea.  +++$+++ :::Indeed, 'according to Burkett' is a good idea. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 14:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
2294 +++$+++ Jlrigamonti +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2290 +++$+++ 2293 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.311409200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for clearing both issues up! I didn't realize I was editing a cited statement.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for clearing both issues up! I didn't realize I was editing a cited statement. [[User:Jlrigamonti|Jlrigamonti]] ([[User talk:Jlrigamonti|talk]]) 01:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
2295 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2290 +++$+++ 2294 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311423000E09 +++$+++ I hope this was a positive experience for you. It all takes getting used to.  +++$+++ :::::I hope this was a positive experience for you. It all takes getting used to. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 05:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

264435 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264435 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-11 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.200117900E09 +++$+++ I've put together a TFD argument in my [[User:Erik\/Sandbox|sandbox]] for eventual nomination of the template for deletion.  I've contacted you since you were the nominator for its first TFD.  Do you have any suggestions on the matter, or examples that I could add? \u2014<font face=\"Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ I've put together a TFD argument in my [[User:Erik/Sandbox|sandbox]] for eventual nomination of the template for deletion.  I've contacted you since you were the nominator for its first TFD.  Do you have any suggestions on the matter, or examples that I could add? —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 22:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
264436 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264435 +++$+++ 264435 +++$+++ 2008-01-12 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.200189960E09 +++$+++ lol. I hadn't noticed that, actually!  +++$+++ :lol. I hadn't noticed that, actually! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

264437 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264437 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-23 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.201152240E09 +++$+++ Could you delete the [[Wiz (anime character)]] link like you deleted [[Astro Boy (manga character)]]? It's a redudant redirect since, like Astro Boy, the character appears in an anime and manga. The Wiz redirects have been taken care of by me.  +++$+++ Could you delete the [[Wiz (anime character)]] link like you deleted [[Astro Boy (manga character)]]? It's a redudant redirect since, like Astro Boy, the character appears in an anime and manga. The Wiz redirects have been taken care of by me. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 21:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
264438 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264437 +++$+++ 264437 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.201227840E09 +++$+++ Hello. I'm afraid it's yet another fan site and is certainly not a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. As your user name suggests, you clearly have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] in linking to it. Reading [[WP:EL]] will help you to understand why this link is inappropriate. Good luck with the site.  +++$+++ :Hello. I'm afraid it's yet another fan site and is certainly not a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. As your user name suggests, you clearly have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] in linking to it. Reading [[WP:EL]] will help you to understand why this link is inappropriate. Good luck with the site. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

568361 +++$+++ Rifleman 82 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-30 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.149056280E09 +++$+++ If it were an automated action, perhaps you would like to look into your code. If it were a conscious action, perhaps you would like to look around before jumping to conclusions. -- +++$+++ If it were an automated action, perhaps you would like to look into your code. If it were a conscious action, perhaps you would like to look around before jumping to conclusions. --[[User:Rifleman 82|Rifleman 82]] 23:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
568362 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568361 +++$+++ 568361 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.149056880E09 +++$+++ OK, fair comment.  The article does read as an essay at the moment and it would benefit from some attention, as you say it is currently receiving.  I wouldn't take offence as to my opinion on the content as-it-stands.  Now that I know it is to be improved rather than left alone my concerns are allayed. The {{tl|prod}} tag can be removed, if required. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :OK, fair comment.  The article does read as an essay at the moment and it would benefit from some attention, as you say it is currently receiving.  I wouldn't take offence as to my opinion on the content as-it-stands.  Now that I know it is to be improved rather than left alone my concerns are allayed. The {{tl|prod}} tag can be removed, if required. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 23:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

2297 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.312171620E09 +++$+++ Hi, FIY: 38.121.23.173 may well be the same as [[User talk:Lloydbaltazar]]. Mostly unsourced edits, on [[Immaculate Conception]] and [[Our Lady of Perpetual Help]] - even used to have his own images. Usually just needs a revert. A complaint somewhere may also be in order id he continues. I am fed up with him.  +++$+++ Hi, FIY: 38.121.23.173 may well be the same as [[User talk:Lloydbaltazar]]. Mostly unsourced edits, on [[Immaculate Conception]] and [[Our Lady of Perpetual Help]] - even used to have his own images. Usually just needs a revert. A complaint somewhere may also be in order id he continues. I am fed up with him. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 21:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
2298 +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ Carl.bunderson +++$+++ 2297 +++$+++ 2297 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312202460E09 +++$+++ I would be the farm that they're the same user. I'll post stronger warnings if I encounter him again with unsourced edits. Thanks for the heads up.  +++$+++ :I would be the farm that they're the same user. I'll post stronger warnings if I encounter him again with unsourced edits. Thanks for the heads up. [[User:Carl.bunderson|carl bunderson]] [[User talk:Carl.bunderson|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Carl.bunderson|(contributions)]] 05:41, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

526587 +++$+++ Peter Isotalo +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526587 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-07 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.173262740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Peter Isotalo|Peter]] <sup>[[User talk:Peter Isotalo|Isotalo]]</sup> 02:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
526588 +++$+++ Peter Isotalo +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526587 +++$+++ 526587 +++$+++ 2007-03-07 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.173264060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Peter Isotalo|Peter]] <sup>[[User talk:Peter Isotalo|Isotalo]]</sup> 02:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

2300 +++$+++ Ugen64 +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2300 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-03-23 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.080112560E09 +++$+++ Again, welcome! I love your creative name :-).  +++$+++ Again, welcome! I love your creative name :-). [[User:Ugen64|ugen64]] 23:16, Mar 23, 2004 (UTC)
2301 +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2300 +++$+++ 2300 +++$+++ 2004-03-24 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.080115380E09 +++$+++ Hmm, I always thought this nick was unoriginal, but thanks!  +++$+++ :Hmm, I always thought this nick was unoriginal, but thanks! [[User:DopefishJustin|DopefishJustin]] 00:03, Mar 24, 2004 (UTC)

526589 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-07 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.173274560E09 +++$+++ Check out my new article: [[Joseph V. Medina]].  Cheers!  +++$+++ Check out my new article: [[Joseph V. Medina]].  Cheers! [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 05:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
526590 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526589 +++$+++ 526589 +++$+++ 2007-03-07 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.173279660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the fixes, you know me, when it comes to the reference thing, I become a mess.  +++$+++ *Thanks for the fixes, you know me, when it comes to the reference thing, I become a mess. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 07:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

2302 +++$+++ Timwi +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-05-03 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.083641220E09 +++$+++ Hiya. It seems that I accidentally deleted Keen5.png in addition to the JPEGs I was ''supposed'' to delete. :\/ I'm sorry about that. I'm glad you said you had the file still, so you can re-upload it. Thanks. &mdash;  +++$+++ Hiya. It seems that I accidentally deleted Keen5.png in addition to the JPEGs I was ''supposed'' to delete. :/ I'm sorry about that. I'm glad you said you had the file still, so you can re-upload it. Thanks. &mdash; [[User:Timwi|Timwi]] 20:27, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
2303 +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2302 +++$+++ 2302 +++$+++ 2004-05-03 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.083645540E09 +++$+++ It's reuploaded now, so no harm done. I guess I'll try to make my listings clearer in the future :)  +++$+++ : It's reuploaded now, so no harm done. I guess I'll try to make my listings clearer in the future :) [[User:DopefishJustin|DopefishJustin]] 21:39, May 3, 2004 (UTC)

264448 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264448 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-04 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.202151840E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather&diff=prev&oldid=189002804 Fun times].  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather&diff=prev&oldid=189002804 Fun times]. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|Have a gorilla]] 11:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
264449 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264448 +++$+++ 264448 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.202157420E09 +++$+++ lol. He might be able to make endless accounts, but it's much quicker for us to block and revert. All in all, it's only his time he's wasting.  +++$+++ :lol. He might be able to make endless accounts, but it's much quicker for us to block and revert. All in all, it's only his time he's wasting. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

2305 +++$+++ Raul654 +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-05-31 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.086063180E09 +++$+++ Also, the term \"Hentai\" is orders of magnitude more popular and recognized. It gets 500 times as many google hits - 22,100,000 to 43,000.  +++$+++ Also, the term "Hentai" is orders of magnitude more popular and recognized. It gets 500 times as many google hits - 22,100,000 to 43,000. [[User:Raul654|&rarr;Raul654]] 21:13, May 31, 2004 (UTC)
2306 +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2305 +++$+++ 2305 +++$+++ 2004-05-31 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.086064680E09 +++$+++ \"H\" is not exactly an abbreviation of \"hentai\" (see [[hentai]]), but fine. It does need to have \"anime\" in it, though, because we probably want categories for manga and games at some point.  +++$+++ : "H" is not exactly an abbreviation of "hentai" (see [[hentai]]), but fine. It does need to have "anime" in it, though, because we probably want categories for manga and games at some point. [[User:DopefishJustin|DopefishJustin]] [[User talk:DopefishJustin|(&#12539;&#8704;&#12539;)]] 21:38, 31 May 2004 (UTC)

264450 +++$+++ 1bevingtonco +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-05 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.202203680E09 +++$+++ I noticed that the Stefan Legein article was previously deleted before I started it again, but I also created another ice hockey player called [[Justin Cross]]. This article is extremely similar to the Stefan Legein article and I was just wondering why it was deleted again. Cheers,  +++$+++ I noticed that the Stefan Legein article was previously deleted before I started it again, but I also created another ice hockey player called [[Justin Cross]]. This article is extremely similar to the Stefan Legein article and I was just wondering why it was deleted again. Cheers, [[User:1bevingtonco|1bevingtonco]] ([[User talk:1bevingtonco|talk]]) 01:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
264451 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264450 +++$+++ 264450 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.202235600E09 +++$+++ Well, Legein was deleted by consensus received at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Stefan Legein]]. I'll have to take a look at Cross...  +++$+++ :Well, Legein was deleted by consensus received at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Legein]]. I'll have to take a look at Cross... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

2308 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-07-13 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.089731040E09 +++$+++ Justin, articles relating to Viz' Shonen Jump use circumflexes instead of macrons because Viz uses circumflexes instead of macrons to mark long vowels in Shonen Jump. Therefore, for articles that are about Shonen Jump manga, circumflexes are used there.  +++$+++ Justin, articles relating to Viz' Shonen Jump use circumflexes instead of macrons because Viz uses circumflexes instead of macrons to mark long vowels in Shonen Jump. Therefore, for articles that are about Shonen Jump manga, circumflexes are used there. [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] 08:04, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
2309 +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2308 +++$+++ 2308 +++$+++ 2004-07-14 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.089790440E09 +++$+++ I don't particularly care what Viz does; this is Wikipedia, not Shonen Jump. I also don't happen to know offhand every series that runs in the English Shonen Jump. I won't bother redoing stuff that's been reverted though.  +++$+++ :I don't particularly care what Viz does; this is Wikipedia, not Shonen Jump. I also don't happen to know offhand every series that runs in the English Shonen Jump. I won't bother redoing stuff that's been reverted though. [[User:DopefishJustin|DopefishJustin]] [[User talk:DopefishJustin|(&#12539;&#8704;&#12539;)]] 00:34, Jul 14, 2004 (UTC)
2310 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2308 +++$+++ 2309 +++$+++ 2004-07-14 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.089863520E09 +++$+++ However, Viz can be inconsistent with using them, so not all instances of a said name WILL have the circumflex. But if it has an instance, it should be used.  +++$+++ ::However, Viz can be inconsistent with using them, so not all instances of a said name WILL have the circumflex. But if it has an instance, it should be used. [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] 20:52, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

612054 +++$+++ Llywrch +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-07-11 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.089534060E09 +++$+++ Very good work on adding material to the [[Gododdin]] article . . . '''but''' the abbreviaton for ''Anno Domini'' (\"in the year of the Lord\") always precedes the number of the year -- it does not come afterwards. I've been told that placing it afterwards is gaining more acceptence, but no one has yet shown me an authority that gives approval to that style. --  +++$+++ Very good work on adding material to the [[Gododdin]] article . . . '''but''' the abbreviaton for ''Anno Domini'' ("in the year of the Lord") always precedes the number of the year -- it does not come afterwards. I've been told that placing it afterwards is gaining more acceptence, but no one has yet shown me an authority that gives approval to that style. -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] 01:21, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
612055 +++$+++ Llywrch +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612054 +++$+++ 612054 +++$+++ 2004-07-14 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.089798420E09 +++$+++ And feel free to ask questions: either of me, on my Talk page; or of anyone at one of the sites mentioned at the [[Wikipedia:Community Portal|Community Portal]]. --  +++$+++ :And feel free to ask questions: either of me, on my Talk page; or of anyone at one of the sites mentioned at the [[Wikipedia:Community Portal|Community Portal]]. -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] 02:47, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

526598 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526598 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.173527280E09 +++$+++ I had made DYK nomination for [[Origin of Karnataka's name]], dated March 5th, well within time. It is just moved to expired noms. Can you please move it to NextUpdate? Thanks. -  +++$+++ I had made DYK nomination for [[Origin of Karnataka's name]], dated March 5th, well within time. It is just moved to expired noms. Can you please move it to NextUpdate? Thanks. - [[User:KNM|KNM]] <sup> '''[[:User_talk:KNM|Talk]]'''</sup> 03:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
526599 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526598 +++$+++ 526598 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.173534180E09 +++$+++ Yes, I have taken care of it now. Also did further cleaning and copyediting. Thanks again. -  +++$+++ :Yes, I have taken care of it now. Also did further cleaning and copyediting. Thanks again. - [[User:KNM|KNM]] <sup> '''[[:User_talk:KNM|Talk]]'''</sup> 05:43, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
526600 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526598 +++$+++ 526599 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.173535440E09 +++$+++ Done! I've added multiple citations in the article, for the hook statement. Thanks. -  +++$+++ ::Done! I've added multiple citations in the article, for the hook statement. Thanks. - [[User:KNM|KNM]] <sup> '''[[:User_talk:KNM|Talk]]'''</sup> 06:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

264455 +++$+++ 156.34.216.55 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264455 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-24 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.203914640E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=250&contribs=user&target=Leo4313660&namespace=6 Leo4313660] has been uploading pics at an alarming rate claiming self-made on most of them. They clearly aren't his and he has already been warned... by you... to cease uploading copyvio images to Wikipedia. To make things worse he has been adding these same sorts of images over at Commons. All of the stolen from various websites relating the the band [[Iron Maiden]]. Any way to wipe the slate clean on these pics? They are all over the place and now that they are showing up on Commons with the same false source\/license it is just an invitation for other users to go ahead and start adding them into articles without double-checking their true origins. Thanks for your help. [[Special:Contributions\/156.34.216.55|156.34.216.55]] ( +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=250&contribs=user&target=Leo4313660&namespace=6 Leo4313660] has been uploading pics at an alarming rate claiming self-made on most of them. They clearly aren't his and he has already been warned... by you... to cease uploading copyvio images to Wikipedia. To make things worse he has been adding these same sorts of images over at Commons. All of the stolen from various websites relating the the band [[Iron Maiden]]. Any way to wipe the slate clean on these pics? They are all over the place and now that they are showing up on Commons with the same false source/license it is just an invitation for other users to go ahead and start adding them into articles without double-checking their true origins. Thanks for your help. [[Special:Contributions/156.34.216.55|156.34.216.55]] ([[User talk:156.34.216.55|talk]]) 20:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
264456 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264455 +++$+++ 264455 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.203916740E09 +++$+++ There are lots of them, aren't there, and it could be a problem. Trouble is, I can't find the source for them. There's a possibility that it might be genuine. I doubt it, but they could be. Once we find the original URLs we've got him.  +++$+++ :There are lots of them, aren't there, and it could be a problem. Trouble is, I can't find the source for them. There's a possibility that it might be genuine. I doubt it, but they could be. Once we find the original URLs we've got him. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

2314 +++$+++ Ashibaka +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-15 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.126779600E09 +++$+++ [[Doujinshi]] gets 14 times as many hits in Google compared to Dojinshi. I think this is probably enough to be an \"accepted romanization\". Let me know what you think.  +++$+++ [[Doujinshi]] gets 14 times as many hits in Google compared to Dojinshi. I think this is probably enough to be an "accepted romanization". Let me know what you think. [[User:Ashibaka|Ashibaka]] ([[User talk:Ashibaka|tock]]) 03:20, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
2315 +++$+++ Ashibaka +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2314 +++$+++ 2314 +++$+++ 2005-09-15 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.126848300E09 +++$+++ And what we need here is a larger Internet.  +++$+++ :And what we need here is a larger Internet. [[User:Ashibaka|Ashibaka]] ([[User talk:Ashibaka|tock]]) 22:25, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

264460 +++$+++ Bob Castle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-15 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.205626920E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks, that would be much appreciated - I finally bought the ''[[One Foot in the Grave]]'' boxset in the Christmas sales, so only about a year or two after it came out. To tell you the truth, I don't really know why I bother with ''[[Mr. Bean]]'', I don't even like the programme that much! I originally just tidied it a bit, and have found myself having to sort it out every time someone writes that their friend look a bit like him or something. I was rather hoping by making it into a decent article it might discourage people, but that somewhat backfired... ''' +++$+++ Hi, thanks, that would be much appreciated - I finally bought the ''[[One Foot in the Grave]]'' boxset in the Christmas sales, so only about a year or two after it came out. To tell you the truth, I don't really know why I bother with ''[[Mr. Bean]]'', I don't even like the programme that much! I originally just tidied it a bit, and have found myself having to sort it out every time someone writes that their friend look a bit like him or something. I was rather hoping by making it into a decent article it might discourage people, but that somewhat backfired... '''[[User:Bob Castle|Bob]]''' <small>'''[[User talk:Bob Castle|talk]]'''</small> 17:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
264461 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264460 +++$+++ 264460 +++$+++ 2008-03-15 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.205629140E09 +++$+++ Well, for the reader, Mr Bean is a decent article. Just not for the few aware of GA standards!  +++$+++ :Well, for the reader, Mr Bean is a decent article. Just not for the few aware of GA standards! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
264462 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264460 +++$+++ 264460 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.206421680E09 +++$+++ It was a very short article with no third party independent sources indicating notability. It is a good idea to draft an article offline before submitting it for publication.  +++$+++ :It was a very short article with no third party independent sources indicating notability. It is a good idea to draft an article offline before submitting it for publication. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

526606 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526606 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-12 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.173690780E09 +++$+++ Please review the photograph at the next update for DYK. It has a watermark on the lower right hand corner. It also is a copyrighted image that is used under implied and not explicit permission. I had replaced the image with a Commons free use one on the article, but I was reverted by another contributor. My understanding is that a free use image should be used over one that is copyrighted with permission. The free use image has a rather unsightly crane in the background. The easiest solution would be to use the flag image.  +++$+++ Please review the photograph at the next update for DYK. It has a watermark on the lower right hand corner. It also is a copyrighted image that is used under implied and not explicit permission. I had replaced the image with a Commons free use one on the article, but I was reverted by another contributor. My understanding is that a free use image should be used over one that is copyrighted with permission. The free use image has a rather unsightly crane in the background. The easiest solution would be to use the flag image. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 02:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
526607 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526606 +++$+++ 526606 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.173692220E09 +++$+++ Responding on user talk page. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Responding on user talk page. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 02:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
526608 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526606 +++$+++ 526607 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.173694260E09 +++$+++ I'll let it go. I prefer to keep out of edit conflicts, or at least choose my battles VERY carefully. I have heard people say many times that watermarks can't remain in Wikipedia, but I couldn't find policy or guideline against it either. Please reply here on your talk page if you feel that you need to.  +++$+++ ::I'll let it go. I prefer to keep out of edit conflicts, or at least choose my battles VERY carefully. I have heard people say many times that watermarks can't remain in Wikipedia, but I couldn't find policy or guideline against it either. Please reply here on your talk page if you feel that you need to. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 03:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

264463 +++$+++ Ben.jiang +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-24 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.206419220E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ben.jiang|Ben.jiang]] ([[User talk:Ben.jiang|talk]]) 21:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
264464 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264463 +++$+++ 264463 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.206421620E09 +++$+++ Well, if the article isn't about the person then there' no point in having an article with that title. The best plan would be to mention it in an existing article on architecture and innovation management science.  +++$+++ :Well, if the article isn't about the person then there' no point in having an article with that title. The best plan would be to mention it in an existing article on architecture and innovation management science. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
264465 +++$+++ Ben.jiang +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264463 +++$+++ 264464 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.206436140E09 +++$+++ I strongly urge you to restate this entry.  +++$+++ ::I strongly urge you to restate this entry. [[User:Ben.jiang|Ben.jiang]] ([[User talk:Ben.jiang|talk]]) 02:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
264466 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264463 +++$+++ 264463 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.206426300E09 +++$+++ Nonetheless, good luck with the site.  +++$+++ :Nonetheless, good luck with the site. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

2320 +++$+++ AdamSolomon +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-29 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.143627060E09 +++$+++ Hmm...the picture was taken on my camera by someone else. To whom does the copyright belong?  +++$+++ Hmm...the picture was taken on my camera by someone else. To whom does the copyright belong? [[User:AdamSolomon|AdamSolomon]] 02:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
2321 +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2320 +++$+++ 2320 +++$+++ 2006-03-29 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.143676620E09 +++$+++ Probably the person who took the photo, unless it was like a handoff to a stranger or something. You're probably OK just licensing it yourself. The important part is that it's not ineligible for copyright so it shouldn't be tagged as such.  +++$+++ :Probably the person who took the photo, unless it was like a handoff to a stranger or something. You're probably OK just licensing it yourself. The important part is that it's not ineligible for copyright so it shouldn't be tagged as such. [[User:DopefishJustin|DopefishJustin]] 15:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

2323 +++$+++ Gennaro Prota +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2323 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-20 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.145597580E09 +++$+++ Hi! For heaven's sake, please, revert all the changes you have done through AWB :-( They are a nightmare for maintainers, as many distinct characters are rendered in the same way or not depending on the font you use. And this means that many errors in the articles source code become virtually undetectable!!! -- +++$+++ Hi! For heaven's sake, please, revert all the changes you have done through AWB :-( They are a nightmare for maintainers, as many distinct characters are rendered in the same way or not depending on the font you use. And this means that many errors in the articles source code become virtually undetectable!!! --[[User:Gennaro Prota|Gennaro Prota]] 22:33, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
2324 +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2323 +++$+++ 2323 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.145598180E09 +++$+++ If you have a specific page that you disagree with the changes on, let me know and I might change it back (or you could do it yourself), but generally the maintainability of the page is improved due to not having to puzzle out inscrutable character numbers. If you really need to distinguish which character codes are being used (which is rarely necessary), copy and paste into a real Unicode editor like [http:\/\/www.babelstone.co.uk\/Software\/BabelPad.html BabelPad]. This has already been discussed in more detail at [[User talk:Curpsbot-unicodify]]; since Wikipedia started using UTF-8 some time ago, all edits where people just type Unicode characters are going to come out as UTF-8 and not HTML codes so there's not much point in preserving them in old pages.  +++$+++ :If you have a specific page that you disagree with the changes on, let me know and I might change it back (or you could do it yourself), but generally the maintainability of the page is improved due to not having to puzzle out inscrutable character numbers. If you really need to distinguish which character codes are being used (which is rarely necessary), copy and paste into a real Unicode editor like [http://www.babelstone.co.uk/Software/BabelPad.html BabelPad]. This has already been discussed in more detail at [[User talk:Curpsbot-unicodify]]; since Wikipedia started using UTF-8 some time ago, all edits where people just type Unicode characters are going to come out as UTF-8 and not HTML codes so there's not much point in preserving them in old pages. [[User:DopefishJustin|DopefishJustin]] 22:43, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
2325 +++$+++ Gennaro Prota +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2323 +++$+++ 2324 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.145603220E09 +++$+++ I have a number of pages related to punctuation in my watch list. I would say all of them benefit from having the character references. Suppose for instance on your machine, with the fonts and the browser you use etc., the typewriter apostrophe (U+0027) and the punctuation apostrophe (U+2019) are rendered the same way (quite likely): you'll never detect if someone typed one instead of the other in the edit box! With the numeric references instead you see at least that they are different and that both are rendered as apostrophes. Granted, in some cases the numeric reference is a non-sense (example: '\xb0F', you can directly type that), but in many others they are much better than having the hard-coded glyph. For an example, look at the revert I did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Punctuation_marks&action=history here] on April 15: to see what the character typed by [[User:Wikipeditor|Wikipeditor]] actually was I had to paste it into an editor and decode it! Weren't the page in my watch list I would have never noticed the error. Believe me, I'm not a newbie as it concerns maintenance issues. -- +++$+++ ::I have a number of pages related to punctuation in my watch list. I would say all of them benefit from having the character references. Suppose for instance on your machine, with the fonts and the browser you use etc., the typewriter apostrophe (U+0027) and the punctuation apostrophe (U+2019) are rendered the same way (quite likely): you'll never detect if someone typed one instead of the other in the edit box! With the numeric references instead you see at least that they are different and that both are rendered as apostrophes. Granted, in some cases the numeric reference is a non-sense (example: '°F', you can directly type that), but in many others they are much better than having the hard-coded glyph. For an example, look at the revert I did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Punctuation_marks&action=history here] on April 15: to see what the character typed by [[User:Wikipeditor|Wikipeditor]] actually was I had to paste it into an editor and decode it! Weren't the page in my watch list I would have never noticed the error. Believe me, I'm not a newbie as it concerns maintenance issues. --[[User:Gennaro Prota|Gennaro Prota]] 00:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
2326 +++$+++ RockOfVictory +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2323 +++$+++ 2324 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.148505960E09 +++$+++ Indeed, I would be careful. See this example for a clear apostrophe problem that makes the text bold if numeric references aren't used: [[Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser#Serious unicodify problem]]. -- +++$+++ ::Indeed, I would be careful. See this example for a clear apostrophe problem that makes the text bold if numeric references aren't used: [[Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser#Serious unicodify problem]]. --[[User:RockOfVictory|J. J.]] 14:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
2327 +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2323 +++$+++ 2326 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.148542500E09 +++$+++ That's why I vet every change before allowing AWB to make it. I specifically don't change markup-sensitive characters like apostrophes, ampersands, and greater-than and less-than signs.  +++$+++ :::That's why I vet every change before allowing AWB to make it. I specifically don't change markup-sensitive characters like apostrophes, ampersands, and greater-than and less-than signs. [[User:DopefishJustin|DopefishJustin]] 00:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

602381 +++$+++ Phil Ian Manning +++$+++ Spesh531 +++$+++ 602381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-27 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.309203540E09 +++$+++ Do not remove large sections of the article please. -- +++$+++ Do not remove large sections of the article please. --[[User:Phil Ian Manning|Phil Ian Manning]] ([[User talk:Phil Ian Manning|talk]]) 12:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
602382 +++$+++ Phil Ian Manning +++$+++ Spesh531 +++$+++ 602381 +++$+++ 602381 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.309205040E09 +++$+++ Maybe that was a little harsh and I'm assuming it was by mistake. My apologies.-- +++$+++ :Maybe that was a little harsh and I'm assuming it was by mistake. My apologies.--[[User:Phil Ian Manning|Phil Ian Manning]] ([[User talk:Phil Ian Manning|talk]]) 13:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
602383 +++$+++ The spesh man +++$+++ Spesh531 +++$+++ 602381 +++$+++ 602382 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.309235580E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I was working on [[Foreign relations of South Sudan]], and than I just got angry and copied it, I was working on the section, a conflict came up, and then I just pasted.  Kind of my mistake.-- +++$+++ ::Yeah, I was working on [[Foreign relations of South Sudan]], and than I just got angry and copied it, I was working on the section, a conflict came up, and then I just pasted.  Kind of my mistake.--[[User:The spesh man|Spesh531]], [[User_talk:The spesh man|My talk]], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:The_spesh_man/External_links  External links] 21:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
602384 +++$+++ Phil Ian Manning +++$+++ Spesh531 +++$+++ 602381 +++$+++ 602383 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.309296060E09 +++$+++ No hard feelings, btw thanks for the maps. I'm assuming it wasn't you with the Belgium and Netherlands opposing independence thing? I just noticed two of the sources for \"Countries opposing the independence\" namely those for Iran and Libya are pre-referendum and of questionable value as neither state that they won't recognise South Sudan. Your thoughts in regard to these? -- +++$+++ ::: No hard feelings, btw thanks for the maps. I'm assuming it wasn't you with the Belgium and Netherlands opposing independence thing? I just noticed two of the sources for "Countries opposing the independence" namely those for Iran and Libya are pre-referendum and of questionable value as neither state that they won't recognise South Sudan. Your thoughts in regard to these? --[[User:Phil Ian Manning|Phil Ian Manning]] ([[User talk:Phil Ian Manning|talk]]) 14:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
602385 +++$+++ The spesh man +++$+++ Spesh531 +++$+++ 602381 +++$+++ 602384 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.309339320E09 +++$+++ The edits were to fast for it to be me reverting my \"own\" edits, if they were my edits.  Originaly, that person had a source, even though it aid Netherlands to support independence of South Sudan, and I do not know where Belgium came in. --  +++$+++ ::::The edits were to fast for it to be me reverting my "own" edits, if they were my edits.  Originaly, that person had a source, even though it aid Netherlands to support independence of South Sudan, and I do not know where Belgium came in. -- [[User:The spesh man|Spesh531]], [[User_talk:The spesh man|My talk]], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:The_spesh_man/External_links  External links] 02:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

264469 +++$+++ Alec.N +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264469 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.206642660E09 +++$+++ Heya bud, Sorry, don;t know how to message on this thing, so feel free to delete this when you read it. Was just creating a page for the Bushwackers Band, which you speedily deleted. Just edited it to put in the criteria for notability and you deleted again (possibly w\/o reading?). If you don;t think it satisfies the criteria, that's cool, but the band has at least two major releases with a reputable recording label + satisfies other criterion that I haven;t researched but I'm fairly sure of. Cheers  +++$+++ Heya bud, Sorry, don;t know how to message on this thing, so feel free to delete this when you read it. Was just creating a page for the Bushwackers Band, which you speedily deleted. Just edited it to put in the criteria for notability and you deleted again (possibly w/o reading?). If you don;t think it satisfies the criteria, that's cool, but the band has at least two major releases with a reputable recording label + satisfies other criterion that I haven;t researched but I'm fairly sure of. Cheers [[User:Alec.N|Alec.N]] ([[User talk:Alec.N|talk]]) 11:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
264470 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264469 +++$+++ 264469 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.206643020E09 +++$+++ Hi there. You are right that it does fulfill the criteria with that assertion, but you will need to support it with third party reliable sources, not just the band's site. Any reviews by notable publications?  +++$+++ :Hi there. You are right that it does fulfill the criteria with that assertion, but you will need to support it with third party reliable sources, not just the band's site. Any reviews by notable publications? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

264471 +++$+++ Alec.N +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.206645420E09 +++$+++ Yeah, touche. Found third party site with info on another album released through a major label; edited article. Hopefully others with more time than I can further reference the article. Peace.  +++$+++ Yeah, touche. Found third party site with info on another album released through a major label; edited article. Hopefully others with more time than I can further reference the article. Peace. [[User:Alec.N|Alec.N]] ([[User talk:Alec.N|talk]]) 12:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
264472 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264471 +++$+++ 264471 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.206643020E09 +++$+++ OK... where do I start? It wasn't encyclopedic. It was [[WP:OR|original research]]. Wikipedia i snot for things made up by bored school kids.  +++$+++ :OK... where do I start? It wasn't encyclopedic. It was [[WP:OR|original research]]. Wikipedia i snot for things made up by bored school kids. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

526618 +++$+++ JPatrickBedell +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-16 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.174048320E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your dilligent efforts to improve Wikipedia.  It is not correct to state that the [[:Cheney-200409-jsonline-dot-com.jpg|image you deleted]] is included solely, or in any intentional way at all, to disparage the subject.  Rather, it was to illustrate the nature of certain allegations of public misconduct, that are deemed to be inappropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia at this time.  It was not my intention to disparage Mr. Cheney, only to bring to wider exposure certain allegations regarding his conduct.  Thank you again.  +++$+++ Thank you for your dilligent efforts to improve Wikipedia.  It is not correct to state that the [[:Cheney-200409-jsonline-dot-com.jpg|image you deleted]] is included solely, or in any intentional way at all, to disparage the subject.  Rather, it was to illustrate the nature of certain allegations of public misconduct, that are deemed to be inappropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia at this time.  It was not my intention to disparage Mr. Cheney, only to bring to wider exposure certain allegations regarding his conduct.  Thank you again. [[User:JPatrickBedell|JPatrickBedell]] 05:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
526619 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526618 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.174073460E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia is not a forum for bringing \"wider exposure\" to allegations. Fuller response on editor's talk page. &mdash;  +++$+++ :: Wikipedia is not a forum for bringing "wider exposure" to allegations. Fuller response on editor's talk page. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 12:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

2331 +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.168513620E09 +++$+++ What's with your Jan. 6, 2006 edit? I see a bunch of question marks in the first sentence.  +++$+++ What's with your Jan. 6, 2006 edit? I see a bunch of question marks in the first sentence. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] 03:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
2332 +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ DopefishJustin +++$+++ 2331 +++$+++ 2331 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.168521060E09 +++$+++ A long time before that edit, I added Darius' name in [[Old Persian cuneiform]] (i.e. the way he would have spelled it himself), because Old Persian had just been added to [[Unicode]] and I thought it would be a cool way to try it out. Of course, cuneiform fonts don't come with Windows so most people don't have any installed and they just see question marks instead. To complicate matters further, since cuneiform is little-used, it's located in an extended area of Unicode called [[Plane 1]], but a lot of (especially older) software doesn't support anything but Plane 0 (which has most of the alphabets etc. used by modern languages). An anonymous user with such software had edited the article [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Darius_I_of_Persia&diff=29062012&oldid=28645999 here] and inadvertently corrupted the cuneiform into gibberish Greek letters (from Plane 0). I didn't notice until Jan. 6, 2006, at which point I replaced it with the correct Plane 1 characters again.  +++$+++ :A long time before that edit, I added Darius' name in [[Old Persian cuneiform]] (i.e. the way he would have spelled it himself), because Old Persian had just been added to [[Unicode]] and I thought it would be a cool way to try it out. Of course, cuneiform fonts don't come with Windows so most people don't have any installed and they just see question marks instead. To complicate matters further, since cuneiform is little-used, it's located in an extended area of Unicode called [[Plane 1]], but a lot of (especially older) software doesn't support anything but Plane 0 (which has most of the alphabets etc. used by modern languages). An anonymous user with such software had edited the article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Darius_I_of_Persia&diff=29062012&oldid=28645999 here] and inadvertently corrupted the cuneiform into gibberish Greek letters (from Plane 0). I didn't notice until Jan. 6, 2006, at which point I replaced it with the correct Plane 1 characters again. [[User:DopefishJustin|DopefishJustin]] 05:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

264477 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-03 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.207249380E09 +++$+++ Hi i recently had to review Westlife again after you failed it, can anything be done to stop people pointlessly renominating an article.  +++$+++ Hi i recently had to review Westlife again after you failed it, can anything be done to stop people pointlessly renominating an article. [[User:Realist2|Realist2]] ([[User talk:Realist2|talk]]) 12:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
264478 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264477 +++$+++ 264477 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.207256820E09 +++$+++ I left some sort of pre-review comments a few days ago because I didn't have time to do a full review. My comments appeared within the 'failed' section, but it was Dihydrogen Monoxide who failed it. Anyway, I guess you could quick fail them if there's been no effort to correct what's been pointed out to them several times. Even if you weren't strictly within the quick fail criteria, you'd probably get support at review under the circumstances.  +++$+++ :I left some sort of pre-review comments a few days ago because I didn't have time to do a full review. My comments appeared within the 'failed' section, but it was Dihydrogen Monoxide who failed it. Anyway, I guess you could quick fail them if there's been no effort to correct what's been pointed out to them several times. Even if you weren't strictly within the quick fail criteria, you'd probably get support at review under the circumstances. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

526622 +++$+++ Wikihermit +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-18 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.174275300E09 +++$+++ I didn't add anything about biased statements did I? I was trying to have the user blocked because of his repeated violation of [[WP:NPOV]]. Please clarify! Thanks!  +++$+++ I didn't add anything about biased statements did I? I was trying to have the user blocked because of his repeated violation of [[WP:NPOV]]. Please clarify! Thanks! [[User:Wikihermit|Wikihermit]] 20:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
526623 +++$+++ Wikihermit +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526622 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.174275360E09 +++$+++ Thank you! -- +++$+++ ::Thank you! --[[User:Wikihermit|Wikihermit]] 20:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
526624 +++$+++ Wikihermit +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526622 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.174275660E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about it! Thanks for your help!  +++$+++ :::Don't worry about it! Thanks for your help! [[User:Wikihermit|Wikihermit]] 20:41, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

264481 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264481 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-03 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.207276320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for a second pair of eyes on this, you have made some good points, which are in process of being addressed. On the point of IMDb, however, [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films]] clearly approves of using this as a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] otherwise it would not list [[:Template:Imdb name]] etc. My own view is that if it's the only source available, it's better than nothing, but fortunately we also have [[Rotten Tomatoes]] and [[Allmovie]] references for AHDN. The rewrite should be finished this time tomorrow.  Cheers. --''' +++$+++ Thanks for a second pair of eyes on this, you have made some good points, which are in process of being addressed. On the point of IMDb, however, [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films]] clearly approves of using this as a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] otherwise it would not list [[:Template:Imdb name]] etc. My own view is that if it's the only source available, it's better than nothing, but fortunately we also have [[Rotten Tomatoes]] and [[Allmovie]] references for AHDN. The rewrite should be finished this time tomorrow.  Cheers. --'''[[User:Rodhullandemu|<font color="7F007F">'''Rodhullandemu'''</font>]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|Talk]]) 19:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
264482 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264481 +++$+++ 264481 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.207335540E09 +++$+++ Hi. The reliability of the IMDb as a reference is controversial, and is only going to become stricter. The consensus tends to be we can use it as an external link but not as a reference. It's because, like Wikipedia, anyone can add content so it is not considered reliable. Film articles do indeed link to IMDb, but you won't find many examples of GA or FA articles which use it as a reference. With the mass of books\/articles that have been written about The Beatles, which I guess members of that project will own, there shouldn't be such a shortage of RS that you'd need to resort to the IMDb.  +++$+++ :Hi. The reliability of the IMDb as a reference is controversial, and is only going to become stricter. The consensus tends to be we can use it as an external link but not as a reference. It's because, like Wikipedia, anyone can add content so it is not considered reliable. Film articles do indeed link to IMDb, but you won't find many examples of GA or FA articles which use it as a reference. With the mass of books/articles that have been written about The Beatles, which I guess members of that project will own, there shouldn't be such a shortage of RS that you'd need to resort to the IMDb. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

264483 +++$+++ Koavf +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-08 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.207648260E09 +++$+++ '''Thank you''' I really do appreciate you undoing the silly vandalism to my talk page, but I rolled it back because I have this obsessive need to keep all the comments visible on the talk page itself. I know it makes no sense, and literally 99.9% of Wikipedians would not do as I have done, so I figured I would explain myself. Again, many thanks for the consideration. - +++$+++ '''Thank you''' I really do appreciate you undoing the silly vandalism to my talk page, but I rolled it back because I have this obsessive need to keep all the comments visible on the talk page itself. I know it makes no sense, and literally 99.9% of Wikipedians would not do as I have done, so I figured I would explain myself. Again, many thanks for the consideration. -[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 02:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
264484 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264483 +++$+++ 264483 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.207675440E09 +++$+++ Fair enough; I guess as the vandalism is not particularly insulting...  +++$+++ :Fair enough; I guess as the vandalism is not particularly insulting... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

264485 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-12 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.208049960E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on getting what appears to be your first successful [[WP:FL]] during the last month.  You may want to get involved in our [[WP:LOTD|List of the Day and List of the Month]] experiment.  Feel free to help us select next months lists at [[User:TonyTheTiger\/List of the Day\/voting\/200805]] or nominate your list for consideration to be a LOTD in June at [[User:TonyTheTiger\/List of the Day\/Nominees\/200806]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ Congratulations on getting what appears to be your first successful [[WP:FL]] during the last month.  You may want to get involved in our [[WP:LOTD|List of the Day and List of the Month]] experiment.  Feel free to help us select next months lists at [[User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200805]] or nominate your list for consideration to be a LOTD in June at [[User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/Nominees/200806]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTD]]) </small> 18:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
264486 +++$+++ DeadlyAssassin +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264485 +++$+++ 264485 +++$+++ 2008-04-15 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.208254560E09 +++$+++ Please also see my question on the article talk page. -- +++$+++ * Please also see my question on the article talk page. --[[User:DeadlyAssassin|Deadly&forall;ssassin]] 03:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

264488 +++$+++ Polly +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-16 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.208340960E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> [[User:Polly|<b style="color:green;">Polly</b>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Polly|<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>]]) 03:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
264489 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264488 +++$+++ 264488 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.208387820E09 +++$+++ Lack of notability, and highly suspect there's some hoaxing going on...  +++$+++ :Lack of notability, and highly suspect there's some hoaxing going on... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

526633 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.174462560E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> -- +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --[[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 00:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
526634 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526633 +++$+++ 526633 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.174463580E09 +++$+++ The bot spotted it and I nominated it.  Thanks for writing it :) --  +++$+++ :The bot spotted it and I nominated it.  Thanks for writing it :) -- [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 00:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

2348 +++$+++ Jrcla2 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-15 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.297769820E09 +++$+++ Do you know how to fix [[:Category:Category-Class college basketball articles]] so that all of the categories in the [[:Category:NA-Class college basketball articles]] are moved over to the cat-class category? This is my first attempt at setting up different classes in a WikiProject and I can't figure out why nothing is showing up in the cat-class, even though tons of categories are marked as such.  +++$+++ Do you know how to fix [[:Category:Category-Class college basketball articles]] so that all of the categories in the [[:Category:NA-Class college basketball articles]] are moved over to the cat-class category? This is my first attempt at setting up different classes in a WikiProject and I can't figure out why nothing is showing up in the cat-class, even though tons of categories are marked as such. [[User:Jrcla2|Jrcla2]] ([[User talk:Jrcla2|talk]]) 03:37, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
2349 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2348 +++$+++ 2348 +++$+++ 2011-02-15 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.297770420E09 +++$+++ I don't know how to fix.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :I don't know how to fix.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 03:47, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

467889 +++$+++ Pak21 +++$+++ Ahoerstemeier +++$+++ 467889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-19 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.192836060E09 +++$+++ Hiya. As you just protected [[User:Pak21]], could I ask you to do the same to [[User talk:Pak21]] as it looks like the vandals are starting there as well. Thanks -- +++$+++ Hiya. As you just protected [[User:Pak21]], could I ask you to do the same to [[User talk:Pak21]] as it looks like the vandals are starting there as well. Thanks --[[User:Pak21|Pak21]] 16:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
467890 +++$+++ Pak21 +++$+++ Ahoerstemeier +++$+++ 467889 +++$+++ 467889 +++$+++ 2007-10-19 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.192840440E09 +++$+++ It's been done. Thanks anyway -- +++$+++ :It's been done. Thanks anyway --[[User:Pak21|Pak21]] 17:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

2352 +++$+++ WFCforLife +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2352 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-22 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.298411460E09 +++$+++ Hi there. At [[User:The Rambling Man\/Main page FL candidates]], the above list has been proposed as one of the early ones to go on the main page. It has aged pretty well: there were a few dead links that I was easily able to fix, and at a glance it appears to meet WP:ACCESS. But I was wondering if you would be willing to take a quick look at the last paragraph of the lead? It's just that at the moment it doesn't have any inline citations, and I'm not too sure where I might turn for that info. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ Hi there. At [[User:The Rambling Man/Main page FL candidates]], the above list has been proposed as one of the early ones to go on the main page. It has aged pretty well: there were a few dead links that I was easily able to fix, and at a glance it appears to meet WP:ACCESS. But I was wondering if you would be willing to take a quick look at the last paragraph of the lead? It's just that at the moment it doesn't have any inline citations, and I'm not too sure where I might turn for that info. Regards, —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 13:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
2353 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2352 +++$+++ 2352 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.298432820E09 +++$+++ I added the refs.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :I added the refs.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 19:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

2355 +++$+++  +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2355 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-06 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.299466620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your efforts at [[1975\u201376 Buffalo Braves season]]. The two preceeding seasons could also use your help, if you get a chance.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ Thanks for your efforts at [[1975–76 Buffalo Braves season]]. The two preceeding seasons could also use your help, if you get a chance.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 18:57, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2356 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2355 +++$+++ 2355 +++$+++ 2011-03-06 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.299468960E09 +++$+++ Yes, I plan to work on them within this week.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :Yes, I plan to work on them within this week.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 19:36, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2357 +++$+++  +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2355 +++$+++ 2356 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.302520500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for fixing up [[1974\u201375 Buffalo Braves season]].  My only other Buffalo Braves [[WP:GA]] is [[1973\u201374 Buffalo Braves season]], which could also use a little help.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ ::Thanks for fixing up [[1974–75 Buffalo Braves season]].  My only other Buffalo Braves [[WP:GA]] is [[1973–74 Buffalo Braves season]], which could also use a little help.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 04:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
2358 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2355 +++$+++ 2357 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.302520680E09 +++$+++ Forget about this. I will do it tomorrow.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::Forget about this. I will do it tomorrow.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 04:18, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
2359 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2355 +++$+++ 2355 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.299815580E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I was not in a good mood at the time and so I might have been \"biting\" the newbie. But in my defense, I did ask him on his talk page to add source for info he added, but he simply ignore me and continue to add the same unsourced info. Note that the article is an FA and all info must be sourced. Also I did not use rollback at all (check the edit you linked, please!), I simply used undo to revert him.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :Sorry, I was not in a good mood at the time and so I might have been "biting" the newbie. But in my defense, I did ask him on his talk page to add source for info he added, but he simply ignore me and continue to add the same unsourced info. Note that the article is an FA and all info must be sourced. Also I did not use rollback at all (check the edit you linked, please!), I simply used undo to revert him.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 19:53, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

526644 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526644 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.175767920E09 +++$+++ The honor is mine to speak to such a dedicated patriot, educator, and writer.  I marvel at your ability to collect, research, and synthesize vast of amount of material into great stories and articles about our cultural heritage.  You are truly performing a great service for the future generations of our Country...<\/blockquote>   +++$+++ The honor is mine to speak to such a dedicated patriot, educator, and writer.  I marvel at your ability to collect, research, and synthesize vast of amount of material into great stories and articles about our cultural heritage.  You are truly performing a great service for the future generations of our Country...</blockquote>  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
526645 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526644 +++$+++ 526644 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.175768340E09 +++$+++ Do I take that as a yes, in you joining me (smile)?  +++$+++ *Do I take that as a yes, in you joining me (smile)? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
526646 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526644 +++$+++ 526644 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.175769360E09 +++$+++ Good! I'm not going to rush into it either, I have to see how to go about it, plus I have the trip to the EastCoast in a couple of weeks.  I was told that through him we would have access to info.  +++$+++ :Good! I'm not going to rush into it either, I have to see how to go about it, plus I have the trip to the EastCoast in a couple of weeks.  I was told that through him we would have access to info. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

262537 +++$+++ Fuzzform +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-18 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.140322140E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Fuzzform|Fuzzform]] 20:09, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
262538 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262537 +++$+++ 262537 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.140328680E09 +++$+++ There are obviously better tools and more qualified folk to do this. But I think a simple diagram is better than no diagram, provided it is correct. You can see a list of the ones I've done on my user page. BTW: I add the diagram to Wikimedia Commons, which magically gets picked up by Wikipedia. If you don't want to draw them yourself, let me know which ones you want images for -- +++$+++ :There are obviously better tools and more qualified folk to do this. But I think a simple diagram is better than no diagram, provided it is correct. You can see a list of the ones I've done on my user page. BTW: I add the diagram to Wikimedia Commons, which magically gets picked up by Wikipedia. If you don't want to draw them yourself, let me know which ones you want images for --[[User:Colin|Colin]] 21:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

2360 +++$+++ Crzycheetah +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-12 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.299998640E09 +++$+++ Hello Chris, one of your finest works is outdated now. [[Charlotte Bobcats all-time roster]] has not been updated for almost two years. I updated some active players, but several players have to be added. I am just letting you know.-- +++$+++ Hello Chris, one of your finest works is outdated now. [[Charlotte Bobcats all-time roster]] has not been updated for almost two years. I updated some active players, but several players have to be added. I am just letting you know.--[[User:Crzycheetah|<font color="#FE552E">'''Cheetah'''</font>]] <small>[[User_talk:Crzycheetah|<font color="#2A2722">'''(talk)'''</font>]]</small> 22:44, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
2361 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2360 +++$+++ 2360 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.300003980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reminding me. I kind of forget about that list. I will update it once I got some time.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for reminding me. I kind of forget about that list. I will update it once I got some time.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 00:13, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

568781 +++$+++ Xyrael +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568781 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-02 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.157223180E09 +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|55px|left|WikiThanks]] [[Image:AviXyrael.gif|right]]I'd like to thank ''you'' ''' (aeropagitica) ''' for either [[Support|supporting]], [[Against|opposing]], [[commenting]], [[Wikipedia:Guide_to_requests_for_adminship#General_advice_for_nominators|nominating]], [[reading]], [[Wikipedia:Tutorial|editing]], [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats|promoting]] and\/or anything else that you may have done for my successful '''[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Xyrael|request for adminship]]''' (I've broken the one thousand sysop barrier!); I'm thanking you for ''getting involved'', and for this I am very [[Gratitude|grateful]]. I hope to be able to serve [[Wikipedia]] more [[Effect|effectively]] with my new [[tools]] and that we can continue to [[build]] our free [[encyclopedia]], for ''[[knowledge]] is [[power]], but only [[wisdom]] is [[liberty]]''. Please do feel free to [[User_talk:Xyrael|get in touch]] if you feel you can [[Development|improve]] me in any way; I will be glad to [[listen]] to all comments. Again, [[thanks]] 8)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &mdash;[[User:Xyrael|Xyra]][[User:Xyrael\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|55px|left|WikiThanks]] [[Image:AviXyrael.gif|right]]I'd like to thank ''you'' ''' (aeropagitica) ''' for either [[Support|supporting]], [[Against|opposing]], [[commenting]], [[Wikipedia:Guide_to_requests_for_adminship#General_advice_for_nominators|nominating]], [[reading]], [[Wikipedia:Tutorial|editing]], [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats|promoting]] and/or anything else that you may have done for my successful '''[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Xyrael|request for adminship]]''' (I've broken the one thousand sysop barrier!); I'm thanking you for ''getting involved'', and for this I am very [[Gratitude|grateful]]. I hope to be able to serve [[Wikipedia]] more [[Effect|effectively]] with my new [[tools]] and that we can continue to [[build]] our free [[encyclopedia]], for ''[[knowledge]] is [[power]], but only [[wisdom]] is [[liberty]]''. Please do feel free to [[User_talk:Xyrael|get in touch]] if you feel you can [[Development|improve]] me in any way; I will be glad to [[listen]] to all comments. Again, [[thanks]] 8)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &mdash;[[User:Xyrael|Xyra]][[User:Xyrael/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Xyrael|l]] / 11:53, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
568782 +++$+++ Xyrael +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568781 +++$+++ 568781 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.157224980E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your congratulations. &mdash;[[User:Xyrael|Xyra]][[User:Xyrael\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Thank you for your congratulations. &mdash;[[User:Xyrael|Xyra]][[User:Xyrael/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Xyrael|l]] / 12:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

526650 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.175863920E09 +++$+++ Just want to thank you before I hit the sack.  +++$+++ Just want to thank you before I hit the sack. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 05:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
526651 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526650 +++$+++ 526650 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.175895720E09 +++$+++ Well we amde GA, thanks again. Isis Sauceda is the author of the article in People en Espanol.  +++$+++ *Well we amde GA, thanks again. Isis Sauceda is the author of the article in People en Espanol. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 14:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

2363 +++$+++ Kante4 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2363 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.300863720E09 +++$+++ Hey, where does it say i reverted it because of vandalism? Was just wondering why the 2007 season where he played D-League was shown below the 2006-present text.  +++$+++ Hey, where does it say i reverted it because of vandalism? Was just wondering why the 2007 season where he played D-League was shown below the 2006-present text. [[User:Kante4|Kante4]] ([[User talk:Kante4|talk]]) 00:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
2364 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2363 +++$+++ 2363 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.300863900E09 +++$+++ Sorry for that. But that change can easily be fixed without reverting, so when you revert without explanation, it gives an impression that it is vandalism.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :Sorry for that. But that change can easily be fixed without reverting, so when you revert without explanation, it gives an impression that it is vandalism.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 00:05, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
2365 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2363 +++$+++ 2364 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.300864080E09 +++$+++ Ok to answer your question, the d-league assignment happened after he first played with mavericks.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ ::Ok to answer your question, the d-league assignment happened after he first played with mavericks.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 00:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
2366 +++$+++ Kante4 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2363 +++$+++ 2365 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.300865100E09 +++$+++ I know when it happened but 2007 below 2006 looks kind of odd.  +++$+++ :::I know when it happened but 2007 below 2006 looks kind of odd. [[User:Kante4|Kante4]] ([[User talk:Kante4|talk]]) 00:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

526654 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526654 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-09 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.176153000E09 +++$+++ As proven by the interviews, Puerto Ricans did serve in regular non-segregated units. However stats, as stated and cited were not keep because Puerto Ricans were considered caucasian.   +++$+++ As proven by the interviews, Puerto Ricans did serve in regular non-segregated units. However stats, as stated and cited were not keep because Puerto Ricans were considered caucasian.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 14:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
526655 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526654 +++$+++ 526654 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.176180060E09 +++$+++ I see what you mean. Frederick Lois Riefkohl,  as a lieutenant, was Commander of the Armed Guard of the USS Philadelphia, but not of the USS Philadelphia. What I'm trying to point out is that there were no Puerto Ricans in important decission making command positions prior to WW II. Such as commanding an entire ship or submarine or division.  You know what I mean? Maybe you can rephrase it.  +++$+++ *I see what you mean. Frederick Lois Riefkohl,  as a lieutenant, was Commander of the Armed Guard of the USS Philadelphia, but not of the USS Philadelphia. What I'm trying to point out is that there were no Puerto Ricans in important decission making command positions prior to WW II. Such as commanding an entire ship or submarine or division.  You know what I mean? Maybe you can rephrase it. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 21:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

2367 +++$+++ Beast from da East +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.300877640E09 +++$+++ I've had it with your disruptive edits, when me and LOL came together to create a new infobox, we did it with the best of intentions, and everything was on and poppin, but two people (you and Zagalejo) keep messing everything else. For the love of God, get it through your head, this is not the old infobox, we have adopted an infobox similar to the NFL and MLB ones. There is no need fpr the small font in the awards section, we must keep it the teams in chronolgical order and the all-star games must be linked. I'm begging you to end this.  +++$+++ I've had it with your disruptive edits, when me and LOL came together to create a new infobox, we did it with the best of intentions, and everything was on and poppin, but two people (you and Zagalejo) keep messing everything else. For the love of God, get it through your head, this is not the old infobox, we have adopted an infobox similar to the NFL and MLB ones. There is no need fpr the small font in the awards section, we must keep it the teams in chronolgical order and the all-star games must be linked. I'm begging you to end this. [[User:Beast from da East|Beast from da East]] ([[User talk:Beast from da East|talk]]) 03:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
2368 +++$+++ Beast from da East +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2367 +++$+++ 2367 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.300929840E09 +++$+++ I'd really love to read the consensus, just to get an idea +++$+++ :I'd really love to read the consensus, just to get an idea[[User:Beast from da East|Beast from da East]] ([[User talk:Beast from da East|talk]]) 18:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
2369 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2367 +++$+++ 2368 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.300930440E09 +++$+++ [[WT:NBA]] records all the major discussions we had. [[Template:Infobox NBA biography\/doc]] has some guidance on formatting. Some are probably not recorded anywhere, like listing All-NBA 1st\/2nd\/3rd team separately, because that is clearly beneficial for readers to see which teams a player was selected at first glance.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ ::[[WT:NBA]] records all the major discussions we had. [[Template:Infobox NBA biography/doc]] has some guidance on formatting. Some are probably not recorded anywhere, like listing All-NBA 1st/2nd/3rd team separately, because that is clearly beneficial for readers to see which teams a player was selected at first glance.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 18:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

526657 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-09 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.176186480E09 +++$+++ DeLoach has been suppling me lots of info for the project and so far he has reaffirmed my conclussion in regard to the PR. commanders. There have some more after WW II, but none before.  +++$+++ DeLoach has been suppling me lots of info for the project and so far he has reaffirmed my conclussion in regard to the PR. commanders. There have some more after WW II, but none before. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
526658 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526657 +++$+++ 526657 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.176194340E09 +++$+++ I'm going crazy (smile).  You know you've made me think.  How about if we eliminate any reference in the paragraphs as to \"it is the first time that...\" and rewrite it simply as something in the line of \"Some Puerto Ricans  also particpated in importnat commanding roles\" ?  +++$+++ *I'm going crazy (smile).  You know you've made me think.  How about if we eliminate any reference in the paragraphs as to "it is the first time that..." and rewrite it simply as something in the line of "Some Puerto Ricans  also particpated in importnat commanding roles" ? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
526659 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526657 +++$+++ 526657 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.176196200E09 +++$+++ Remember, the 51,000 is only referring to the exact number of Puerto Ricans who served in Puerto Rican units from the island.  The military did keep stats on the Hispanics who served in Regular army units.  Only stats of African-American and Asian-American were kept (as I cited).  Therefore, the exact number of Puerto Ricans who lived in the mainland and who were assigned either to regular caucasian or black units is unknown and as a consecuence the exact total of Puerto Ricans in general who participated in the war cannot be known.  +++$+++ :Remember, the 51,000 is only referring to the exact number of Puerto Ricans who served in Puerto Rican units from the island.  The military did keep stats on the Hispanics who served in Regular army units.  Only stats of African-American and Asian-American were kept (as I cited).  Therefore, the exact number of Puerto Ricans who lived in the mainland and who were assigned either to regular caucasian or black units is unknown and as a consecuence the exact total of Puerto Ricans in general who participated in the war cannot be known. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

264514 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264514 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-12 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.223861820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reminder; I'll be over there shortly. &ndash; +++$+++ Thanks for the reminder; I'll be over there shortly. &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 18:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
264515 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264514 +++$+++ 264514 +++$+++ 2008-10-12 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.223864160E09 +++$+++ The other ones haven't had a reply yet, so I'm still unsure about their reliability. Cheers, &ndash; +++$+++ :The other ones haven't had a reply yet, so I'm still unsure about their reliability. Cheers, &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 19:16, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

524683 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-03 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.196671020E09 +++$+++ I figured something like this would come up eventually... Since it is probably the most respected and famous of a 17-year series of mainstream theatrical pornographic releases, I gave ''[[Wife to be Sacrificed]]'' a top rating of importance on the rating scale. Anyone at all familiar with Japanese exploitation cinema will know the title and the star, and relate the two... Anyway, someone has taken exception with no reason except \"No reason for it to be top.\" Who is right? And, really, does it matter?  +++$+++ I figured something like this would come up eventually... Since it is probably the most respected and famous of a 17-year series of mainstream theatrical pornographic releases, I gave ''[[Wife to be Sacrificed]]'' a top rating of importance on the rating scale. Anyone at all familiar with Japanese exploitation cinema will know the title and the star, and relate the two... Anyway, someone has taken exception with no reason except "No reason for it to be top." Who is right? And, really, does it matter? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
524684 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524683 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.196728620E09 +++$+++ Well, the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography\/Assessment#Importance_scale]] says Top should be \"subjects famous within pornography and indisputably notable even outside pornography. In other words, they have many in depth articles, documentaries, films, or books from both mainstream and porn sources devoted to them.\" Examples include Linda Lovelace, Ron Jeremy, Hugh Hefner, Playboy, names that even many people not familiar with pornography specifically will know. For US films, that would probably be ''Deep Throat'', maybe ''Debbie Does Dallas'', and possibly that's it. For Japan, you'll have to be the judge. I know that if an American late night comedian can name either of those two movie titles in the punchline of a joke and not have any worry about most of his audience recognizing them. Would that be true about ''Wife to be Sacrificed''? If only people familiar with Japanese exploitation cinema would know the title (but all of those would), then High would be about right. If you don't know what the Japanese man-on-the-street knows about the movie, you can look at the in depth sources on the film. I see it has several indepth articles devoted to it in Asian Cult Cinema, but that's really in genre. Are there any indepth mainstream books or articles about it? There are loads on Playboy, for example, and our article on [[Deep Throat]] has articles in the New York Times and the Guardian, not even counting Lovelace's autobiographies; [[Debbie Does Dallas]] doesn't have those, but does have a documentary and a Broadway show... Does it matter one way or the other? Well, no. Not really. :-) These are internal-only markings, they're meant to be there because some editors like to be able to find a list of \"important\" subjects that could use a bit more editor effort, and because the \"important\" subjects ''probably'' have more sources to be expanded. But they're not part of our product, the articles themselves. -- +++$+++ :: Well, the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography/Assessment#Importance_scale]] says Top should be "subjects famous within pornography and indisputably notable even outside pornography. In other words, they have many in depth articles, documentaries, films, or books from both mainstream and porn sources devoted to them." Examples include Linda Lovelace, Ron Jeremy, Hugh Hefner, Playboy, names that even many people not familiar with pornography specifically will know. For US films, that would probably be ''Deep Throat'', maybe ''Debbie Does Dallas'', and possibly that's it. For Japan, you'll have to be the judge. I know that if an American late night comedian can name either of those two movie titles in the punchline of a joke and not have any worry about most of his audience recognizing them. Would that be true about ''Wife to be Sacrificed''? If only people familiar with Japanese exploitation cinema would know the title (but all of those would), then High would be about right. If you don't know what the Japanese man-on-the-street knows about the movie, you can look at the in depth sources on the film. I see it has several indepth articles devoted to it in Asian Cult Cinema, but that's really in genre. Are there any indepth mainstream books or articles about it? There are loads on Playboy, for example, and our article on [[Deep Throat]] has articles in the New York Times and the Guardian, not even counting Lovelace's autobiographies; [[Debbie Does Dallas]] doesn't have those, but does have a documentary and a Broadway show... Does it matter one way or the other? Well, no. Not really. :-) These are internal-only markings, they're meant to be there because some editors like to be able to find a list of "important" subjects that could use a bit more editor effort, and because the "important" subjects ''probably'' have more sources to be expanded. But they're not part of our product, the articles themselves. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
524685 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524683 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.196730600E09 +++$+++ Well, note that, by pure coincidence, every \"Top\" subject you list is American. Note also, that in many English-language sources, Japan is called the largest porn market in the world. The Roman Porno series is something without anything even close to equivalent in the U.S. How many American porn series have won Academy Awards? Yes, Nikkatsu Roman Porno and ''Ikenie Fujin'' are common knowledge in Japan. [[Hideo Nakata]] made a mainstream documentary on the director which I haven't seen yet-- give me a couple weeks-- but I'd be very, ''very'' surprised if ''Wife to be Sacrificed'' is not a major focal point of that documentary. As far as sourcing, as is the policy here, I try to avoid the Japanese-language whenever possible. But if you want evidence of coverage in mainstream Japanese media on the film, it's certainly there for this one, and, no doubt, for many other films in the series... So, does it really come down to what is known in the English-speaking world? U.S. specifically? And even if so, yes, even some English books on general Japanese cinema do mention the genre and the film. (But there I am limiting again, with \"Japanese cinema\"... I suppose the film needs to be covered in an English-language book on cinema in general, 99.9% of which cover nothing but-- surprise!-- U.S. films.) But, like you say, it really doesn't matter. As long as the Gods of Deletionism allowed us to cover the subject I'm more interested in writing the articles than in the bureaucracy...  +++$+++ ::: Well, note that, by pure coincidence, every "Top" subject you list is American. Note also, that in many English-language sources, Japan is called the largest porn market in the world. The Roman Porno series is something without anything even close to equivalent in the U.S. How many American porn series have won Academy Awards? Yes, Nikkatsu Roman Porno and ''Ikenie Fujin'' are common knowledge in Japan. [[Hideo Nakata]] made a mainstream documentary on the director which I haven't seen yet-- give me a couple weeks-- but I'd be very, ''very'' surprised if ''Wife to be Sacrificed'' is not a major focal point of that documentary. As far as sourcing, as is the policy here, I try to avoid the Japanese-language whenever possible. But if you want evidence of coverage in mainstream Japanese media on the film, it's certainly there for this one, and, no doubt, for many other films in the series... So, does it really come down to what is known in the English-speaking world? U.S. specifically? And even if so, yes, even some English books on general Japanese cinema do mention the genre and the film. (But there I am limiting again, with "Japanese cinema"... I suppose the film needs to be covered in an English-language book on cinema in general, 99.9% of which cover nothing but-- surprise!-- U.S. films.) But, like you say, it really doesn't matter. As long as the Gods of Deletionism allowed us to cover the subject I'm more interested in writing the articles than in the bureaucracy... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 17:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
524686 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524683 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.196732520E09 +++$+++ That's why I say I'm leaving it up to you as the subject expert - I do the best I can, I'm not the fount of all knowledge on everything. In general, when a genre expert comes to me and says \"X is more notable than you think\", I generally say \"OK\". Besides you on Japan, there have been a couple of people who didn't think I knew enough about French stars, and of course they were right, I don't. There was also a happy few months when we had a gay porn expert contributing that I could ask similar questions of - \"do you know who Y is?\" and he could say - \"yes, he won the following 3 prizes\" or \"no, wouldn't know him from Adam ... or Steve ...\" It doesn't have to be an English language book; that is preferable for easier verifiability, but it's not required, if there is only a Japanese language book, that would do.-- +++$+++ :::: That's why I say I'm leaving it up to you as the subject expert - I do the best I can, I'm not the fount of all knowledge on everything. In general, when a genre expert comes to me and says "X is more notable than you think", I generally say "OK". Besides you on Japan, there have been a couple of people who didn't think I knew enough about French stars, and of course they were right, I don't. There was also a happy few months when we had a gay porn expert contributing that I could ask similar questions of - "do you know who Y is?" and he could say - "yes, he won the following 3 prizes" or "no, wouldn't know him from Adam ... or Steve ..." It doesn't have to be an English language book; that is preferable for easier verifiability, but it's not required, if there is only a Japanese language book, that would do.--[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
524687 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524683 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.196735520E09 +++$+++ OK-- I'm pretty sure I could dig through some Japanese sources to prove the film is a \"Top\" rather than a \"High\", but I'm also pretty sure that would be research and editing time wasted splitting hairs. As long as the article can stand, and be improved, \"High\" is just fine with me. I'd like to point out, though, that I'm not saying these subjects are notable only within the area of Japanese porn, but in the general popular culture, in a way that even the American subjects you mention do not compare. I'd like to start articles on the Korean erotic cinema, with which I also have some familiarity, but, unlike Japan, proof of notability in the society at large, and sourcing (that I am able to locate, anyway) is just not there. Like Japan they do have a healthy erotic streak in their culture. But with the stronger Confucian and Christian influence, except for a few notable mainstream, very soft exceptions like ''[[Mulberry (film)|Ppong]]'', the erotic cinema is kept pretty hush-hush, especially to outsiders.  +++$+++ ::::: OK-- I'm pretty sure I could dig through some Japanese sources to prove the film is a "Top" rather than a "High", but I'm also pretty sure that would be research and editing time wasted splitting hairs. As long as the article can stand, and be improved, "High" is just fine with me. I'd like to point out, though, that I'm not saying these subjects are notable only within the area of Japanese porn, but in the general popular culture, in a way that even the American subjects you mention do not compare. I'd like to start articles on the Korean erotic cinema, with which I also have some familiarity, but, unlike Japan, proof of notability in the society at large, and sourcing (that I am able to locate, anyway) is just not there. Like Japan they do have a healthy erotic streak in their culture. But with the stronger Confucian and Christian influence, except for a few notable mainstream, very soft exceptions like ''[[Mulberry (film)|Ppong]]'', the erotic cinema is kept pretty hush-hush, especially to outsiders. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
524688 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524683 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.196736960E09 +++$+++ By the way-- Take a look at what's on the front-page today. [[Branded to Kill]]-- Just a stone's throw from my main editing area!  +++$+++ :::::: By the way-- Take a look at what's on the front-page today. [[Branded to Kill]]-- Just a stone's throw from my main editing area! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

526660 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.176199380E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/www.nationalww2museum.org\/education\/education_numbers.html We cannot go by assumptions therefore, it would be unfair to place a number of  a total amount or speculation of a total. The fact is that a total amont of those who served is unknown.  +++$+++ http://www.nationalww2museum.org/education/education_numbers.html We cannot go by assumptions therefore, it would be unfair to place a number of  a total amount or speculation of a total. The fact is that a total amont of those who served is unknown. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
526661 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526660 +++$+++ 526660 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.176200460E09 +++$+++ The problem that I have with the estimates from both sites is that neither of them provide an explanation nor source as to how they reached those numbers. I'm afraid of what will happen if in the future if other sites pop-up with different estimates. I rather stick to the facts.  +++$+++ *The problem that I have with the estimates from both sites is that neither of them provide an explanation nor source as to how they reached those numbers. I'm afraid of what will happen if in the future if other sites pop-up with different estimates. I rather stick to the facts. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

2374 +++$+++ Cooldenny +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-14 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.302833520E09 +++$+++ I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding \"Motivation of Wikipedia contributors.\" I would like to invite you to [[User:Cooldenny\/Questionnaire | a short survey]]. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only '''5 minutes'''.  +++$+++ I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to [[User:Cooldenny/Questionnaire | a short survey]]. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only '''5 minutes'''. [[User:Cooldenny|cooldenny]] ([[User talk:Cooldenny|talk]]) 19:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
2375 +++$+++ Dave1185 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.303131600E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Manila_hostage_crisis&diff=prev&oldid=424561282 This edit of yours] makes you look bad without first discussing it on the talk page...  and I was tempted to template you but decided against it in the end, leaving you this notice instead. Best. --<small> +++$+++ *[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manila_hostage_crisis&diff=prev&oldid=424561282 This edit of yours] makes you look bad without first discussing it on the talk page...  and I was tempted to template you but decided against it in the end, leaving you this notice instead. Best. --<small>[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®]]</span></sup></small> 06:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2376 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.303182120E09 +++$+++ Properly sourced doesn't mean it should be included. The fact that ''[[Global Times]]'' is controlled by the Chinese government has nothing to do with this incident. It is a simple edit and I don't see the need to discuss.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :Properly sourced doesn't mean it should be included. The fact that ''[[Global Times]]'' is controlled by the Chinese government has nothing to do with this incident. It is a simple edit and I don't see the need to discuss.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 20:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2377 +++$+++ Dave1185 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.303183740E09 +++$+++ Read [[WP:Verifiability]]. Nufff said~! --<small> +++$+++ ::*Read [[WP:Verifiability]]. Nufff said~! --<small>[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®]]</span></sup></small> 20:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2378 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.303184340E09 +++$+++ Look I already start a discussion on [[Talk:Manila hostage crisis]], please discuss there and stop blindly reverting.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::Look I already start a discussion on [[Talk:Manila hostage crisis]], please discuss there and stop blindly reverting.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 20:39, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2379 +++$+++ Dave1185 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.303184580E09 +++$+++ Pending the outcome of the discussion, what say you lay your hands off? As it is very ungentlemenly of you to keep reverting without getting a consensus first, don't you think so? --<small> +++$+++ ::::*Pending the outcome of the discussion, what say you lay your hands off? As it is very ungentlemenly of you to keep reverting without getting a consensus first, don't you think so? --<small>[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®]]</span></sup></small> 20:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2380 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.303184700E09 +++$+++ And it is very ungentlemenly of you to keep adding this in without getting a consensus first, don't you think so?\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::::And it is very ungentlemenly of you to keep adding this in without getting a consensus first, don't you think so?—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 20:45, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2381 +++$+++ Dave1185 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.303184880E09 +++$+++ BTW, you just violated 3RR, need me to remind of the situation you're in right now? As for that verified entry, leave it alone until the outcome of the discussion. Take the hint, wil'ya? --<small> +++$+++ ::::::*BTW, you just violated 3RR, need me to remind of the situation you're in right now? As for that verified entry, leave it alone until the outcome of the discussion. Take the hint, wil'ya? --<small>[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®]]</span></sup></small> 20:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2382 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.303185120E09 +++$+++ You need to open your eye and read 3RR again. I am still one away from violating it according to the rule.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::::::You need to open your eye and read 3RR again. I am still one away from violating it according to the rule.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 20:52, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2383 +++$+++ Dave1185 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.303185240E09 +++$+++ Do you want a second opinion on this? --<small> +++$+++ ::::::::*Do you want a second opinion on this? --<small>[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®]]</span></sup></small> 20:54, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2384 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.303189320E09 +++$+++ I have been asked to provide some input in this discussion; specifically about 3RR, but I note that you are a long established user and have no need to be reminded of the policy. What I am going to comment upon is [[WP:Consensus]]. You removed the previous edit to an article noting, in part, that 'everyone knows that the media in China is controlled by the state (or words to that effect)...' I would then ask you to provide a cite to that statement - not about the control of the media, since there is little dispute over that, but that \"...everyone knows...\" Presently, two editors have reverted your removal of the content, with one referencing [[WP:Verifiability]]. You have only provided an WP:OR reason (and not one grounded in policy, that I know of) for your actions. WP:3RR is only a clear bright line where there appears to be a genuine dispute over the application of policy, from what I have seen there is a WP:Consensus for the retention of the material per reference to policy. Unless you can provide a better argued rationale for the removal of the edit I would suggest that it is kept, and that a further non consensual revert - regardless of a time scale - is disruptive and liable to invite sanction.  +++$+++ *I have been asked to provide some input in this discussion; specifically about 3RR, but I note that you are a long established user and have no need to be reminded of the policy. What I am going to comment upon is [[WP:Consensus]]. You removed the previous edit to an article noting, in part, that 'everyone knows that the media in China is controlled by the state (or words to that effect)...' I would then ask you to provide a cite to that statement - not about the control of the media, since there is little dispute over that, but that "...everyone knows..." Presently, two editors have reverted your removal of the content, with one referencing [[WP:Verifiability]]. You have only provided an WP:OR reason (and not one grounded in policy, that I know of) for your actions. WP:3RR is only a clear bright line where there appears to be a genuine dispute over the application of policy, from what I have seen there is a WP:Consensus for the retention of the material per reference to policy. Unless you can provide a better argued rationale for the removal of the edit I would suggest that it is kept, and that a further non consensual revert - regardless of a time scale - is disruptive and liable to invite sanction. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 22:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2385 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.303189980E09 +++$+++ While the fact is sourced, I think its inclusion is a violation of [[WP:NPOV]]. It is biased to specifically note that Chinese government controls its media as if to tell readers to disregard their position or opinion in response to the incident. Last time I checked, WP:NPOV is also a policy. It seems we are only focusing on [[WP:V]] here without thinking about WP:NPOV.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :While the fact is sourced, I think its inclusion is a violation of [[WP:NPOV]]. It is biased to specifically note that Chinese government controls its media as if to tell readers to disregard their position or opinion in response to the incident. Last time I checked, WP:NPOV is also a policy. It seems we are only focusing on [[WP:V]] here without thinking about WP:NPOV.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 22:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2386 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ 2385 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.303191300E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... An interesting interpretation. I read it more as providing a basis by which a lesser known publication may be considered as an official outlet for statements by party officials. Perhaps asking the intent of the originating editor, and finding a way to ensure that a policy compliant version appears in the text, would be a reasonable option?  +++$+++ ::Hmmm... An interesting interpretation. I read it more as providing a basis by which a lesser known publication may be considered as an official outlet for statements by party officials. Perhaps asking the intent of the originating editor, and finding a way to ensure that a policy compliant version appears in the text, would be a reasonable option? [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 22:35, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2387 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ 2386 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.303191780E09 +++$+++ I will talk to the originating editor, I guess. Meanwhile [[User:Dave1185]] seems to disagree with my edits, but he refuses to discuss with me. I can't force him to discuss, so what should I do?\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::I will talk to the originating editor, I guess. Meanwhile [[User:Dave1185]] seems to disagree with my edits, but he refuses to discuss with me. I can't force him to discuss, so what should I do?—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 22:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2388 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ 2387 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.303192020E09 +++$+++ As there now appears to be a discussion upon the substance of the issue, I shall invite him to review it and comment. +++$+++ ::::As there now appears to be a discussion upon the substance of the issue, I shall invite him to review it and comment.[[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 22:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
2389 +++$+++ Dave1185 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2374 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-19 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.303223400E09 +++$+++ Mark, thank you for calming him down while I went to catch some badly needed sleep. And his argument notwithstanding, not many people know that ''Global Times'' is produced under auspices of the ''People's Daily'' (I, for one, didn't knew it until I check to verify it~!), itself being the party's direct mouthpeice to the masses as well as being under the direct supervision of the [[Propaganda Department of the Communist Party of China]]. The addition of this little known fact is to let the ordinary readers understand this and leave it to them to their discretion on how they would interpret it, this alone has everything to do with NPOV already. Is that really that hard to comprehend? Chris, I'd suggest you go read up on [[WP:LAME]], I'm done talking to you. --<small> +++$+++ :::::*Mark, thank you for calming him down while I went to catch some badly needed sleep. And his argument notwithstanding, not many people know that ''Global Times'' is produced under auspices of the ''People's Daily'' (I, for one, didn't knew it until I check to verify it~!), itself being the party's direct mouthpeice to the masses as well as being under the direct supervision of the [[Propaganda Department of the Communist Party of China]]. The addition of this little known fact is to let the ordinary readers understand this and leave it to them to their discretion on how they would interpret it, this alone has everything to do with NPOV already. Is that really that hard to comprehend? Chris, I'd suggest you go read up on [[WP:LAME]], I'm done talking to you. --<small>[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®]]</span></sup></small> 07:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

264521 +++$+++ Bradley0110 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-17 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.224297240E09 +++$+++ Only the other day I was thinking about nominating this article for GA. Looks like you beat me to it!  +++$+++ Only the other day I was thinking about nominating this article for GA. Looks like you beat me to it! [[User:Bradley0110|Bradley0110]] ([[User talk:Bradley0110|talk]]) 19:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
264522 +++$+++ Bradley0110 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264521 +++$+++ 264521 +++$+++ 2008-10-18 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.224343920E09 +++$+++ Looks good! I chose not to nominate it because the huge amount of crap actor articles that have been pumped through GA over the summer made me feel down. Plus, we don't have dates and roles for all of his theatre performances. Still, these two interviews [http:\/\/www.thenational.ae\/article\/20081007\/ART\/964995864\/1082\/ART][http:\/\/www.business24-7.ae\/articles\/2008\/10\/pages\/10042008_0a38b428666144ca9ed827f35522152c.aspx] seem to just say \"Is your Wikipedia article correct?\", so at least we know the page is factually accurate! Leave a note on my talk page when you get around to working on ''Jekyll''; it needs a lot of work to bring it up to scratch\u2014it's heavily-reliant on press releases at the moment and needs to incorporate more secondary sources.  +++$+++ :Looks good! I chose not to nominate it because the huge amount of crap actor articles that have been pumped through GA over the summer made me feel down. Plus, we don't have dates and roles for all of his theatre performances. Still, these two interviews [http://www.thenational.ae/article/20081007/ART/964995864/1082/ART][http://www.business24-7.ae/articles/2008/10/pages/10042008_0a38b428666144ca9ed827f35522152c.aspx] seem to just say "Is your Wikipedia article correct?", so at least we know the page is factually accurate! Leave a note on my talk page when you get around to working on ''Jekyll''; it needs a lot of work to bring it up to scratch—it's heavily-reliant on press releases at the moment and needs to incorporate more secondary sources. [[User:Bradley0110|Bradley0110]] ([[User talk:Bradley0110|talk]]) 08:32, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

526666 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-14 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.176585420E09 +++$+++ Could you give me your input on this? See [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#User:Tmacrockets0115_and_User:Kobetmacyao]]. I don't want to make a blatant wrong call. +++$+++ Could you give me your input on this? See [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Tmacrockets0115_and_User:Kobetmacyao]]. I don't want to make a blatant wrong call.[[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 14:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
526667 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526666 +++$+++ 526666 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.176607620E09 +++$+++ OK thanks. I'll be looking. The persons being complained about are clearly disruptive. My main concern is are they socks of oneanother and does this warrant indef blocks. I know the sock policy is to indef block. So I guess the question is are they socks and the actions disruptive enough. +++$+++ :OK thanks. I'll be looking. The persons being complained about are clearly disruptive. My main concern is are they socks of oneanother and does this warrant indef blocks. I know the sock policy is to indef block. So I guess the question is are they socks and the actions disruptive enough.[[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 20:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

175159 +++$+++ Mjroots2 +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-01 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.275448980E09 +++$+++ I've reverted your edit. If you care to check the sources, they are nearly all imperial units given, which are converted into metric for the ''convenience'' of readers who understand metric measurements better than imperial measurements. There may be the odd occasion where a measurement quoted by a source in metric is given as imperial first for consistency. There are many thousands of ship articles which use dual measurements. For modern ships, sources generally give measurements in metric, which are naturally quoted first and converted to imperial. Off the top of my head, {{MV|Danny F II}} is one of these.  +++$+++ I've reverted your edit. If you care to check the sources, they are nearly all imperial units given, which are converted into metric for the ''convenience'' of readers who understand metric measurements better than imperial measurements. There may be the odd occasion where a measurement quoted by a source in metric is given as imperial first for consistency. There are many thousands of ship articles which use dual measurements. For modern ships, sources generally give measurements in metric, which are naturally quoted first and converted to imperial. Off the top of my head, {{MV|Danny F II}} is one of these. [[User:Mjroots2|Mjroots2]] ([[User talk:Mjroots2|talk]]) 20:23, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
175160 +++$+++ Mjroots2 +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175159 +++$+++ 175159 +++$+++ 2010-06-01 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.275449400E09 +++$+++ I note you've reverted my reinstatement of sourced measurement. Raised at [[WT:SHIPS#SS Ernst Brockelmann]].  +++$+++ :I note you've reverted my reinstatement of sourced measurement. Raised at [[WT:SHIPS#SS Ernst Brockelmann]]. [[User:Mjroots2|Mjroots2]] ([[User talk:Mjroots2|talk]]) 20:30, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

526668 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526668 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-14 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.176606420E09 +++$+++ When ever you have the time, please take a look here: [[User:Marine 69-71\/Workshop| Workshop]] and feel free to make any fixes.  +++$+++ When ever you have the time, please take a look here: [[User:Marine 69-71/Workshop| Workshop]] and feel free to make any fixes. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 20:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
526669 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526668 +++$+++ 526668 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.176610740E09 +++$+++ Received e-mail, thank you for the kind words. Also, when you look at the article, feel free to rephrase anything. You know how it is, sometimes when you write an article, you can't see what someone else sees.  That's why I took your recommendations (and I really want to thank you) in the [[Puerto Ricans in World War II]] and thanks to that it made FA.  +++$+++ *Received e-mail, thank you for the kind words. Also, when you look at the article, feel free to rephrase anything. You know how it is, sometimes when you write an article, you can't see what someone else sees.  That's why I took your recommendations (and I really want to thank you) in the [[Puerto Ricans in World War II]] and thanks to that it made FA. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 21:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
526670 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526668 +++$+++ 526668 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.176614460E09 +++$+++ O.K., go ahead and delete section. As I said, I fully trust what you do.  +++$+++ :O.K., go ahead and delete section. As I said, I fully trust what you do. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 22:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
526671 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526668 +++$+++ 526668 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.176621900E09 +++$+++ I found something in relation to \"Flag Officer\" here: [http:\/\/4mermarine.com\/USMC\/dictionary.html#F], but it looks better the way you've rephrased.  In regard to the USNA questions, I'll forward them to DeLoach to see if he can provide some documentation in regard to stats.  +++$+++ *I found something in relation to "Flag Officer" here: [http://4mermarine.com/USMC/dictionary.html#F], but it looks better the way you've rephrased.  In regard to the USNA questions, I'll forward them to DeLoach to see if he can provide some documentation in regard to stats. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
526672 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526668 +++$+++ 526668 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.176622560E09 +++$+++ I'll place it in main space as soon as I receive some imput from DeLoach. I want him to take a look at it, plus I asked him if he can provide any documentation in regard to your questions. Thank you for your help, as always you did an excellent job.  +++$+++ :I'll place it in main space as soon as I receive some imput from DeLoach. I want him to take a look at it, plus I asked him if he can provide any documentation in regard to your questions. Thank you for your help, as always you did an excellent job. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

264526 +++$+++ 97.103.81.29 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-06 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.228610820E09 +++$+++ As its stated goals, Wikipedia is about quality, not quantity. [[Special:Contributions\/97.103.81.29|97.103.81.29]] ( +++$+++ As its stated goals, Wikipedia is about quality, not quantity. [[Special:Contributions/97.103.81.29|97.103.81.29]] ([[User talk:97.103.81.29|talk]]) 16:47, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
264527 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264526 +++$+++ 264526 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.228616340E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia is a collaborative project. If you possess admirable copyediting skills, that is great. However, it is inappropriate to discuss the work of others with such contempt (some established editors have that annoying habit). Perhaps the editors of the work you are commenting upon don't have English as a first language, or have not had a privileged education. Civility and respect are more in keeping with the [[WP:PILLARS|pillars]] of the project rather than relatively superficial grammatical issues.  +++$+++ :Wikipedia is a collaborative project. If you possess admirable copyediting skills, that is great. However, it is inappropriate to discuss the work of others with such contempt (some established editors have that annoying habit). Perhaps the editors of the work you are commenting upon don't have English as a first language, or have not had a privileged education. Civility and respect are more in keeping with the [[WP:PILLARS|pillars]] of the project rather than relatively superficial grammatical issues. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

264528 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-19 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.229693160E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 05:26, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
264529 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264528 +++$+++ 264528 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.229833980E09 +++$+++ Sob, sob, sob.  +++$+++ :Sob, sob, sob. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:33, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
264530 +++$+++ 217.39.1.5 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264528 +++$+++ 264529 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.229836320E09 +++$+++ I'm not a fan either, come to think of it [[Special:Contributions\/217.39.1.5|217.39.1.5]] ( +++$+++ ::I'm not a fan either, come to think of it [[Special:Contributions/217.39.1.5|217.39.1.5]] ([[User talk:217.39.1.5|talk]]) 21:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
264531 +++$+++ 217.39.1.5 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264528 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.229837760E09 +++$+++ And by the way - when I said I wasn't a fan... it wasn't a not fan of the JPS - it was not a fan of you you cunt IP [[Special:Contributions\/217.39.1.5|217.39.1.5]] ( +++$+++ ::::And by the way - when I said I wasn't a fan... it wasn't a not fan of the JPS - it was not a fan of you you cunt IP [[Special:Contributions/217.39.1.5|217.39.1.5]] ([[User talk:217.39.1.5|talk]]) 21:36, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

44088 +++$+++ Muijz +++$+++ Omegastar +++$+++ 44088 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-10 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.270954320E09 +++$+++ Hello Omegastar. If I am not mistaken, your [[Doornenburg Castle]] article is actually a translation of the Dutch article ''Kasteel Doornenburg'' which happens to be written by me. Would you be so kind as to acknowledge this fact by indicating it at the end of the article or on the discussion page - whichever is deemed an appropriate copyright notice at ''en-wp''. Thank you in advance.  +++$+++ Hello Omegastar. If I am not mistaken, your [[Doornenburg Castle]] article is actually a translation of the Dutch article ''Kasteel Doornenburg'' which happens to be written by me. Would you be so kind as to acknowledge this fact by indicating it at the end of the article or on the discussion page - whichever is deemed an appropriate copyright notice at ''en-wp''. Thank you in advance. [[User:Muijz|Muijz]] ([[User talk:Muijz|talk]]) 19:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
44089 +++$+++ Muijz +++$+++ Omegastar +++$+++ 44088 +++$+++ 44088 +++$+++ 2010-08-04 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.280972160E09 +++$+++ In fact the idea of the template is that you refer to a ''specific'' version of the article, (the version that you actually translated). Not to the article in general. (The article might have been totally altered.) Please refer to the version that was translated. See [[Template:Translated page]] for more details.  +++$+++ :In fact the idea of the template is that you refer to a ''specific'' version of the article, (the version that you actually translated). Not to the article in general. (The article might have been totally altered.) Please refer to the version that was translated. See [[Template:Translated page]] for more details. [[User:Muijz|Muijz]] ([[User talk:Muijz|talk]]) 18:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

526674 +++$+++ Poeloq +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-15 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.176643080E09 +++$+++ For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|for biographies]], [[WP:WEB|for web sites]], [[WP:BAND|for bands]], or [[WP:CORP|for companies]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn -->   +++$+++ For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|for biographies]], [[WP:WEB|for web sites]], [[WP:BAND|for bands]], or [[WP:CORP|for companies]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn -->  [[User:Poeloq|Poeloq]] 06:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
526675 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526674 +++$+++ 526674 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.176697080E09 +++$+++ No problem with deleting this one.  I did notify an editor who self-identifies as a band member to see if there was something more to establish notability. &mdash;  +++$+++ : No problem with deleting this one.  I did notify an editor who self-identifies as a band member to see if there was something more to establish notability. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 21:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

264533 +++$+++ Wildhartlivie +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264533 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-22 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.229934600E09 +++$+++ There needs to be a central place to discuss this and invite editors who have an issue. It came up on ''[[Shakespeare in Love]]'', also. Regardless of what is written on the category page, it is redundant to put a film in the nominee and the winner categories. It also seems to me to be over-categorization. My view is that the winning supercedes the nomination. Perhaps consensus should be solicited on this.  +++$+++ There needs to be a central place to discuss this and invite editors who have an issue. It came up on ''[[Shakespeare in Love]]'', also. Regardless of what is written on the category page, it is redundant to put a film in the nominee and the winner categories. It also seems to me to be over-categorization. My view is that the winning supercedes the nomination. Perhaps consensus should be solicited on this. [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 00:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
264534 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264533 +++$+++ 264533 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.229967180E09 +++$+++ Indeed, that's why I brought it up at the Film project. I agree with your view.  +++$+++ :Indeed, that's why I brought it up at the Film project. I agree with your view. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

2390 +++$+++ Bagumba +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-19 05:34:00 +++$+++ 1.303216440E09 +++$+++ Your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Kobe_Bryant_%E2%80%93_Shaquille_O%27Neal_feud&curid=3652202&diff=424791617&oldid=424791361 edit added a reference to \"Heisler, p.45\"], but p45 doesnt seem to match with any of the other Heisler references in the article to SI.com or LA Times.  Did you mean to refer to a book (not already listed)? \u2014 +++$+++ Your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kobe_Bryant_%E2%80%93_Shaquille_O%27Neal_feud&curid=3652202&diff=424791617&oldid=424791361 edit added a reference to "Heisler, p.45"], but p45 doesnt seem to match with any of the other Heisler references in the article to SI.com or LA Times.  Did you mean to refer to a book (not already listed)? —[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 05:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
2391 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2390 +++$+++ 2390 +++$+++ 2011-04-19 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.303216740E09 +++$+++ I copied this from Los Angeles Lakers directly, so I don't know. I think it is a book.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :I copied this from Los Angeles Lakers directly, so I don't know. I think it is a book.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 05:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

526679 +++$+++ Jaakobou +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-15 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.176668700E09 +++$+++ [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]] and [[User:SFC9394|SFC9394]]. i did '''not delete or edit'' any comments.. only moved a misplaced comment to the proper chronological order since the other user has placed his \"vandalism report\" above my previous complaint for personal attacks. however, i agree that i should not move other user's comments which means i will only place links to my comments in the proper chonology. on a jokingly side (i hope you can take it on a lighter spirit side despite the heated situation) i was moving my own comments above rolandR's comments and not moving his comments down. <\/joke> on the serious side, user RolandR has removed the personal attack warning i issued on his user talk page.  +++$+++ [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]] and [[User:SFC9394|SFC9394]]. i did '''not delete or edit'' any comments.. only moved a misplaced comment to the proper chronological order since the other user has placed his "vandalism report" above my previous complaint for personal attacks. however, i agree that i should not move other user's comments which means i will only place links to my comments in the proper chonology. on a jokingly side (i hope you can take it on a lighter spirit side despite the heated situation) i was moving my own comments above rolandR's comments and not moving his comments down. </joke> on the serious side, user RolandR has removed the personal attack warning i issued on his user talk page. [[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]] 13:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
526680 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526679 +++$+++ 526679 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.176671280E09 +++$+++ As I said, you \"moved\" a comment. \"Edit\" covers moving comments as the context is changed. As you are a party to the complaint, you should let others handle any issues with respect to the out of mis-ordered comments.  Let other editors make their own mistakes.  If you disagree with ''where'' someone else puts the comment, make note of the placement; but, don't move it. In addition, as the editor's original comment that you moved was not in response to the subject line below it, in my opinion, it was in the proper location as a response to the comments above it.  I recommend that you let the case speak for itself, rather than escalating it further by making the ANI itself an issue.   You have been asked very nicely not to edit other's comments in the ANI case.  If you do this again, you are subject to being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]].  &mdash;  +++$+++ : As I said, you "moved" a comment. "Edit" covers moving comments as the context is changed. As you are a party to the complaint, you should let others handle any issues with respect to the out of mis-ordered comments.  Let other editors make their own mistakes.  If you disagree with ''where'' someone else puts the comment, make note of the placement; but, don't move it. In addition, as the editor's original comment that you moved was not in response to the subject line below it, in my opinion, it was in the proper location as a response to the comments above it.  I recommend that you let the case speak for itself, rather than escalating it further by making the ANI itself an issue.   You have been asked very nicely not to edit other's comments in the ANI case.  If you do this again, you are subject to being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]].  &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 14:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
526681 +++$+++ Jaakobou +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526679 +++$+++ 526680 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.176671400E09 +++$+++ i've managed to resolve the situation in a better way thank you.  +++$+++ ::i've managed to resolve the situation in a better way thank you. [[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]] 14:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
526682 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526679 +++$+++ 526681 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.176671820E09 +++$+++ Thank you for stepping back and agreeing to leave the other's edits alone.  Working this issue with civility is appreciated.  &mdash;  +++$+++ ::: Thank you for stepping back and agreeing to leave the other's edits alone.  Working this issue with civility is appreciated.  &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 14:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
526683 +++$+++ Jaakobou +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526679 +++$+++ 526682 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.176672240E09 +++$+++ i do try to resolve disputes, this one though is a unique and very much problematic case. you're more than invited to see the entire thread and weigh in on it.  +++$+++ ::::i do try to resolve disputes, this one though is a unique and very much problematic case. you're more than invited to see the entire thread and weigh in on it. [[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]] 14:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

264537 +++$+++ Chamal_N +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-26 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.230342780E09 +++$+++ Hi, JPS! There's a question [[Wikipedia_talk:New_contributors'_help_page#.22Dr._James_Robinson_.28filk_artist.29.22_entry|here]] about an article you deleted. Do you think that article can be restored or is it better to write another properly? Maybe you could explain yourself. You seem to have a lot of non-fans btw ;)  +++$+++ Hi, JPS! There's a question [[Wikipedia_talk:New_contributors'_help_page#.22Dr._James_Robinson_.28filk_artist.29.22_entry|here]] about an article you deleted. Do you think that article can be restored or is it better to write another properly? Maybe you could explain yourself. You seem to have a lot of non-fans btw ;) [[User:Chamal_N|'''<span style="color:#000080">C</span>h<span style="color:#0000FF">a</span><span style="color:#4169E1">m</span><span style="color:#1E90FF">a</span><span style="color:#87CEEB">l</span>''']] [[User talk:Chamal_N|<sup>talk</sup>]] 17:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
264538 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264537 +++$+++ 264537 +++$+++ 2008-12-26 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.230349560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know: I've replied on the page to which you link. Yes, I have a littler army of non-fans. They range from a kid who is still upset that I deleted his non-free image violations about 40 months ago, to the truly psychotic.  +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know: I've replied on the page to which you link. Yes, I have a littler army of non-fans. They range from a kid who is still upset that I deleted his non-free image violations about 40 months ago, to the truly psychotic. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

2395 +++$+++ Zagalejo +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-30 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.304167020E09 +++$+++ Just FYI, it might take me a while to get to it. I have a long to-do list, and somewhat limited free time.  +++$+++ Just FYI, it might take me a while to get to it. I have a long to-do list, and somewhat limited free time. [[User: Zagalejo|Zagal<font color="green">e</font>jo]]'''[[User talk:Zagalejo|^^^]]''' 05:37, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
2396 +++$+++ Zagalejo +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2395 +++$+++ 2395 +++$+++ 2011-05-03 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.304422260E09 +++$+++ I started looking at the article, but I'm not sure how much I'll be able to do, since I don't own the Lazenby book. My initial thoughts are that the article will need a fair amount of work. It often feels like ideas were just kind of thrown together, will little sense of paragraph development. For example, take a look at the first paragraph of the \"Origins\" section. That one was hard for me to get through. We introduce the idea that O'Neal and Bryant \"sparred\" from the beginning, but at least one statement seems to contradict the thesis (ie, O'Neal putting his arm around Bryant after a tough night).  +++$+++ :I started looking at the article, but I'm not sure how much I'll be able to do, since I don't own the Lazenby book. My initial thoughts are that the article will need a fair amount of work. It often feels like ideas were just kind of thrown together, will little sense of paragraph development. For example, take a look at the first paragraph of the "Origins" section. That one was hard for me to get through. We introduce the idea that O'Neal and Bryant "sparred" from the beginning, but at least one statement seems to contradict the thesis (ie, O'Neal putting his arm around Bryant after a tough night). [[User: Zagalejo|Zagal<font color="green">e</font>jo]]'''[[User talk:Zagalejo|^^^]]''' 04:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

526684 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-15 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.176696480E09 +++$+++ Made changes recommended, ready to post after you do the reference thing on two new references that I added.  +++$+++ Made changes recommended, ready to post after you do the reference thing on two new references that I added. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 21:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
526685 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526684 +++$+++ 526684 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.176709920E09 +++$+++ Thank you for everything. I'll start on my next project after I come back from the east coast. I'm going to post a message in my talk page on the 17th and I would like to know if it is O.K. if I refer you as the person to answer any questions which requires an answer from an admin. until I come back.   +++$+++ *Thank you for everything. I'll start on my next project after I come back from the east coast. I'm going to post a message in my talk page on the 17th and I would like to know if it is O.K. if I refer you as the person to answer any questions which requires an answer from an admin. until I come back.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

2397 +++$+++ Marcus Qwertyus +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-02 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.304399580E09 +++$+++ The commanders of the battles are listed not the commanders of the war. In any case Osama was not in any kind of authoritative position and was client of his bodyguards. Imagine if the Humvee of the President of the United States was ambushed in Iraq. Do you really think he would be barking commands at his troops? Or would his military escorts do most of the commanding?  +++$+++ The commanders of the battles are listed not the commanders of the war. In any case Osama was not in any kind of authoritative position and was client of his bodyguards. Imagine if the Humvee of the President of the United States was ambushed in Iraq. Do you really think he would be barking commands at his troops? Or would his military escorts do most of the commanding? [[User:Marcus Qwertyus|<font color="#21421" >'''Marcus'''</font>]] [[User talk:Marcus Qwertyus|<font color="#CC7722" >'''Qwertyus'''</font>]]  22:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
2398 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2397 +++$+++ 2397 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.304399880E09 +++$+++ No, that person in Osama's case or in your example is not the commander, just the leader.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :No, that person in Osama's case or in your example is not the commander, just the leader.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 22:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

264542 +++$+++ Black Kite +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-28 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.230504060E09 +++$+++ I have semi'd your user and talkpages temporarily owing to an outbreak of silliness there. Thanks, <b> +++$+++ I have semi'd your user and talkpages temporarily owing to an outbreak of silliness there. Thanks, <b>[[User talk:Black Kite|<font color="black">Black Kite</font>]]</b> 14:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
264543 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264542 +++$+++ 264542 +++$+++ 2008-12-28 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.230504780E09 +++$+++ Cheers. Yeah, if the kid is wasting the vandal-fighters' time, it's probably best.  +++$+++ :Cheers. Yeah, if the kid is wasting the vandal-fighters' time, it's probably best. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
264544 +++$+++ Black Kite +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264542 +++$+++ 264543 +++$+++ 2008-12-28 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.230509220E09 +++$+++ Just remove it yourself when your army of fans gets bored :) <b> +++$+++ :: Just remove it yourself when your army of fans gets bored :) <b>[[User talk:Black Kite|<font color="black">Black Kite</font>]]</b> 16:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

526687 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526687 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.176720000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
526688 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526687 +++$+++ 526687 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.176723960E09 +++$+++ I agree with you.  The thing is that DeLoach is also a historian and its obvious that he knows what he's talking about.  In the meantime, I'm going to search for references.  +++$+++ *I agree with you.  The thing is that DeLoach is also a historian and its obvious that he knows what he's talking about.  In the meantime, I'm going to search for references. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

264545 +++$+++ Woody +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264545 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-02 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.230939420E09 +++$+++ I think it would be more appropriate to up it to full protection for a content dispute. I know I could still edit it, but it avoids the image of one rule for editors, one for IPs. I would do it, but that would be a huge conflict of interest. What do you think? For the issue itself, I have solicited opinions from 3 wikiprojects. Regards,  +++$+++ I think it would be more appropriate to up it to full protection for a content dispute. I know I could still edit it, but it avoids the image of one rule for editors, one for IPs. I would do it, but that would be a huge conflict of interest. What do you think? For the issue itself, I have solicited opinions from 3 wikiprojects. Regards, [[User:Woody|Woody]] ([[User talk:Woody|talk]]) 15:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
264546 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264545 +++$+++ 264545 +++$+++ 2009-01-02 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.230939840E09 +++$+++ I've increased the level of protection. On the other hand, thinking again. if you're an admin too it might look worse to restrict editing to just admins...  +++$+++ :I've increased the level of protection. On the other hand, thinking again. if you're an admin too it might look worse to restrict editing to just admins... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
264547 +++$+++ Woody +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264545 +++$+++ 264546 +++$+++ 2009-01-02 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.230940140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that. The point is that nobody should edit that article until it is unprotected, admin or not. When we get a consensus either way, then it is unprotected and anyone can edit it again. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Thanks for that. The point is that nobody should edit that article until it is unprotected, admin or not. When we get a consensus either way, then it is unprotected and anyone can edit it again. Regards, [[User:Woody|Woody]] ([[User talk:Woody|talk]]) 15:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

2403 +++$+++ Ryan Vesey +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2403 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-20 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.305947700E09 +++$+++ Does [[WP:OVERLINK]] still apply in the same way to templates?  I see no problem with having the links appear more than once in the format it is in.  Isn't the general purpose of the rule to keep excessive blue links off of a page for readability?  This wouldn't affect readability.  There are also different rules for links in tables; although, this is all part of one table.  I re-added links, and reformatted them so they applied to teams instead of cities.  Feel free to revert again after thinking about this post, I just didn't want to lose the work and need to re-change all of the links if we decided they were necessary.  +++$+++ Does [[WP:OVERLINK]] still apply in the same way to templates?  I see no problem with having the links appear more than once in the format it is in.  Isn't the general purpose of the rule to keep excessive blue links off of a page for readability?  This wouldn't affect readability.  There are also different rules for links in tables; although, this is all part of one table.  I re-added links, and reformatted them so they applied to teams instead of cities.  Feel free to revert again after thinking about this post, I just didn't want to lose the work and need to re-change all of the links if we decided they were necessary. [[User:Ryan Vesey|Ryan Vesey]] ([[User talk:Ryan Vesey|talk]]) 20:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
2404 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2403 +++$+++ 2403 +++$+++ 2011-05-20 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.305948240E09 +++$+++ As far as I know, [[WP:OVERLINK]] applies everywhere in the main space. The reason I removed is that since all the teams are already linked, it is redundant to link again. But you are right that the purpose of WP:OVERLINK is to maintain readability, which is not affected by linking in this case.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :As far as I know, [[WP:OVERLINK]] applies everywhere in the main space. The reason I removed is that since all the teams are already linked, it is redundant to link again. But you are right that the purpose of WP:OVERLINK is to maintain readability, which is not affected by linking in this case.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 20:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

264549 +++$+++ Edito*Magica +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-06 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.231298280E09 +++$+++ There were several problems with the One Foot in the Grave article. Character description was too long for the page so a new one was created for this. The plot summary went off the point and into an episode synopsis of the first episode; it was also full of opinions and Wikipeda articles are suppose to be neutral. The plot summary is designed to summarise the key points, so there\u2019s no need for over-the-top detail. Thank you. +++$+++ There were several problems with the One Foot in the Grave article. Character description was too long for the page so a new one was created for this. The plot summary went off the point and into an episode synopsis of the first episode; it was also full of opinions and Wikipeda articles are suppose to be neutral. The plot summary is designed to summarise the key points, so there’s no need for over-the-top detail. Thank you.[[User:Edito*Magica|Edito*Magica]] ([[User talk:Edito*Magica|talk]]) 19:18, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
264550 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264549 +++$+++ 264549 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.231298400E09 +++$+++ I've replied on the discussion page.  +++$+++ :I've replied on the discussion page. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:20, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
264551 +++$+++ Edito*Magica +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264549 +++$+++ 264550 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.231316940E09 +++$+++ Well i'm glad we've settled the issues in question.  +++$+++ ::Well i'm glad we've settled the issues in question. [[User:Edito*Magica|Edito*Magica]] ([[User talk:Edito*Magica|talk]]) 00:29, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
264552 +++$+++ Edito*Magica +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264549 +++$+++ 264551 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.231318860E09 +++$+++ Although most of the article is better suited to prose, a cast list is an exception because it's the best way of showing which actors play which characters. A majority of articles relating to comedy shows do use cast lists. Prose isn't always the best way of displaying information, that's way infoboxes are also used. And large amounts of text doesn't mean an article is good when the same information can be conveyed in much fewer words. So don't be alarmed if expression is sharpened to make the article more concise. I've shifted some of the information under the plot summary to a new, more relevant heading. For example, as with many other comedy articles of this kind, specific episode information has been placed under the \"episode\" heading. The final thing is that the character synopses make the article too long, and again many articles of this kind do use a separate page for character detail...i have done the same for this one to further improve the quality of the article. +++$+++ :::Although most of the article is better suited to prose, a cast list is an exception because it's the best way of showing which actors play which characters. A majority of articles relating to comedy shows do use cast lists. Prose isn't always the best way of displaying information, that's way infoboxes are also used. And large amounts of text doesn't mean an article is good when the same information can be conveyed in much fewer words. So don't be alarmed if expression is sharpened to make the article more concise. I've shifted some of the information under the plot summary to a new, more relevant heading. For example, as with many other comedy articles of this kind, specific episode information has been placed under the "episode" heading. The final thing is that the character synopses make the article too long, and again many articles of this kind do use a separate page for character detail...i have done the same for this one to further improve the quality of the article.[[User:Edito*Magica|Edito*Magica]] ([[User talk:Edito*Magica|talk]]) 01:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
264553 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264549 +++$+++ 264551 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 09:39:00 +++$+++ 1.231349940E09 +++$+++ Please keep the discussion to the article's talk page so that all editors can keep track of it more easily. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::Please keep the discussion to the article's talk page so that all editors can keep track of it more easily. Thanks. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
264554 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264549 +++$+++ 264549 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.231350120E09 +++$+++ I had the article on my watchlist and saw you protected it. As an involved editor you should not have protected it to your prefered version.  +++$+++ :I had the article on my watchlist and saw you protected it. As an involved editor you should not have protected it to your prefered version. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 09:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
264555 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264549 +++$+++ 264554 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 09:48:00 +++$+++ 1.231350480E09 +++$+++ Thanks. As I was not the primary author of this article (only a handful of its content is mine) I considered myself to be independent enough to protect it. However, since I have made some more edits, you're right that I'm not the person to protect it.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. As I was not the primary author of this article (only a handful of its content is mine) I considered myself to be independent enough to protect it. However, since I have made some more edits, you're right that I'm not the person to protect it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
264556 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264549 +++$+++ 264555 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.231353840E09 +++$+++ Even yesterday protection was not that good though since you edited the article while it was protected. I have to article on my watclist and will also keep an eye on it and protect it if necessary.  +++$+++ :::Even yesterday protection was not that good though since you edited the article while it was protected. I have to article on my watclist and will also keep an eye on it and protect it if necessary. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 10:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
264557 +++$+++ Edito*Magica +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264549 +++$+++ 264555 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.231379220E09 +++$+++ Please see my last three comments on the discussion page. Thanks. +++$+++ :::Please see my last three comments on the discussion page. Thanks.[[User:Edito*Magica|Edito*Magica]] ([[User talk:Edito*Magica|talk]]) 17:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

2406 +++$+++ Bagumba +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2406 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-26 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.306450200E09 +++$+++ I saw your edit to not have team colors in the infobox for [[Mike Brown (basketball, born 1970)]].  Is there a particular mos that dictates this restriction?  Personally, I find it more aesthetic to associate coaches with their affiliated team.  Otherwise, [[Template:Infobox_NBA_biography\/doc]] should be updated to explicitly say it shold not be used for non-players. \u2014 +++$+++ I saw your edit to not have team colors in the infobox for [[Mike Brown (basketball, born 1970)]].  Is there a particular mos that dictates this restriction?  Personally, I find it more aesthetic to associate coaches with their affiliated team.  Otherwise, [[Template:Infobox_NBA_biography/doc]] should be updated to explicitly say it shold not be used for non-players. —[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 15:50, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
2407 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2406 +++$+++ 2406 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.306462500E09 +++$+++ No MOS that dictates these project things. But the status quo has been like that since the infobox was used on coaches. I think it is confusing to have color on non-players.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :No MOS that dictates these project things. But the status quo has been like that since the infobox was used on coaches. I think it is confusing to have color on non-players.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 19:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
2408 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2406 +++$+++ 2406 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.306577640E09 +++$+++ Well per [[WP:V|Wikipedia policy]], \"The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth\u2014whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true.\"\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :Well per [[WP:V|Wikipedia policy]], "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true."—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 03:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
2409 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2406 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.306633680E09 +++$+++ Well first, please stop your personal attack. If you continue, I will report you. You said \"You *could* have watched the video, saw that the page was clearly incorrect and then *sourced it yourself*.\" This shows you don't understand policy. [[Wikipedia:No original research]] tells us that we can't use our own observation as reference, instead we use a reliable published source. And it is crazy how you twist words in the source. Attack basically means punching someone in this case since that is what they were all doing. Quoting the source you listed, it says \"Indiana's Stephen Jackson joins his teammate in the seats and starts throwing punches.\" Jackson joined the fight, but was he punching someone in retaliation for the cup thrown at Artest? We don't know if that is true because the source doesn't say. Finally we based our content on reliable sources. Whether or not the claims are actually \"true\" is really irrelevant.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::Well first, please stop your personal attack. If you continue, I will report you. You said "You *could* have watched the video, saw that the page was clearly incorrect and then *sourced it yourself*." This shows you don't understand policy. [[Wikipedia:No original research]] tells us that we can't use our own observation as reference, instead we use a reliable published source. And it is crazy how you twist words in the source. Attack basically means punching someone in this case since that is what they were all doing. Quoting the source you listed, it says "Indiana's Stephen Jackson joins his teammate in the seats and starts throwing punches." Jackson joined the fight, but was he punching someone in retaliation for the cup thrown at Artest? We don't know if that is true because the source doesn't say. Finally we based our content on reliable sources. Whether or not the claims are actually "true" is really irrelevant.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 18:48, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
2410 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2406 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.306723080E09 +++$+++ I don't care whether your attack is on target. [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]] forbids that.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::::I don't care whether your attack is on target. [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]] forbids that.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 19:38, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
2411 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2406 +++$+++ 2408 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.306724460E09 +++$+++ Video could be used as source when nothing else is available. But it is hard to use them because video is opened to interpretations. Different people based on their own pov will have a different take or observation on the event (exactly what [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]] is), it is hard to have a neutral way to say what happen. Using worded sources is often better. Because it is no longer based on original research, but based on a reliable published source.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ ::Video could be used as source when nothing else is available. But it is hard to use them because video is opened to interpretations. Different people based on their own pov will have a different take or observation on the event (exactly what [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]] is), it is hard to have a neutral way to say what happen. Using worded sources is often better. Because it is no longer based on original research, but based on a reliable published source.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 20:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
2412 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2406 +++$+++ 2406 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.306722540E09 +++$+++ First of all, you made a legal threat in violation of [[Wikipedia:No legal threats]]. I will report you on that. Back to the issue, when you add something, the burden is on you to find references, not the other way around. With that said, the reference you listed there works now because it explains that Jackson punched someone in retaliation for the cup thrown at Artest. That could now be added.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :First of all, you made a legal threat in violation of [[Wikipedia:No legal threats]]. I will report you on that. Back to the issue, when you add something, the burden is on you to find references, not the other way around. With that said, the reference you listed there works now because it explains that Jackson punched someone in retaliation for the cup thrown at Artest. That could now be added.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 19:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
2413 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2406 +++$+++ 2406 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.306802160E09 +++$+++ You need to read those rules you listed. [[Wikipedia:Libel]]\/[[Wikipedia:BLP]] both apply. But I think it is you who is violating the policies. [[Wikipedia:Libel]] says \"'''all information need to be [[WP:NOR|referenced]] through the citation of reliable published sources, so as to maintain a standard of [[WP:V|verifiability]].'''\" This is what I told you earlier. [[Wikipedia:BLP]] says \"'''All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced\u2014whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable\u2014should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.'''\" This is also what I told you earlier. And I can't believe you bring out [[Wikipedia:WikiBullying]] when you yourself is doing the bullying. Make no mistake, asking you to follow rules is not bullying.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :You need to read those rules you listed. [[Wikipedia:Libel]]/[[Wikipedia:BLP]] both apply. But I think it is you who is violating the policies. [[Wikipedia:Libel]] says "'''all information need to be [[WP:NOR|referenced]] through the citation of reliable published sources, so as to maintain a standard of [[WP:V|verifiability]].'''" This is what I told you earlier. [[Wikipedia:BLP]] says "'''All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.'''" This is also what I told you earlier. And I can't believe you bring out [[Wikipedia:WikiBullying]] when you yourself is doing the bullying. Make no mistake, asking you to follow rules is not bullying.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 17:36, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

393617 +++$+++ Cacycle +++$+++ Darrien +++$+++ 393617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-23 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.111615620E09 +++$+++ I have compiled an new article about the [[GreenFacts]] Foundation.  +++$+++ I have compiled an new article about the [[GreenFacts]] Foundation. [[User:Cacycle|Cacycle]] 14:07, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
393618 +++$+++ Darrien +++$+++ Darrien +++$+++ 393617 +++$+++ 393617 +++$+++ 2005-03-24 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.111661040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Darrien|Darrien]] 02:44, 2005 Mar 24 (UTC)
393619 +++$+++ Cacycle +++$+++ Darrien +++$+++ 393617 +++$+++ 393618 +++$+++ 2005-03-24 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.111687080E09 +++$+++ Darrien, it looks as if you will end in their Panel of Experts collection... But I'm sure they pay good money... :-P  +++$+++ :: Darrien, it looks as if you will end in their Panel of Experts collection... But I'm sure they pay good money... :-P [[User:Cacycle|Cacycle]] 09:58, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
393620 +++$+++ Cacycle +++$+++ Darrien +++$+++ 393617 +++$+++ 393618 +++$+++ 2005-03-24 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.111687980E09 +++$+++ I think this discussion should be moved to the mercury talk page.  +++$+++ :: I think this discussion should be moved to the mercury talk page. [[User:Cacycle|Cacycle]] 10:13, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
393621 +++$+++ StephanieM +++$+++ Darrien +++$+++ 393617 +++$+++ 393620 +++$+++ 2005-03-30 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.112204520E09 +++$+++ An adjustement to the context box is relatively easy. Changes to the texts of level 1 and 2 summaries would be more difficult at this stage as they have already undergone a thorough peer review by experts in that field. When changes are made to such texts they require a renewed peer review and approval by our Scientific Board... We will make another check.  +++$+++ ::: An adjustement to the context box is relatively easy. Changes to the texts of level 1 and 2 summaries would be more difficult at this stage as they have already undergone a thorough peer review by experts in that field. When changes are made to such texts they require a renewed peer review and approval by our Scientific Board... We will make another check. [[User:StephanieM|StephanieM]] 09:42, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

526696 +++$+++ Annalissette +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526696 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-19 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.177041180E09 +++$+++ I have not engaged in 3RR violations.  Furthermore, the other editors are engaging in an edit war.  Rather than explain why the medical expert's advice is bad, they just keep reverting (without any compromise) the campaign spin, not the NPOV version that wikipedia is supposed to be.  Jersyko and Tvoz are those other editors.  Furthermore, they attack me and do not \"assume good faith\".  On the other hand, I do not attack them even when I can see they are not being fair or objective. +++$+++ I have not engaged in 3RR violations.  Furthermore, the other editors are engaging in an edit war.  Rather than explain why the medical expert's advice is bad, they just keep reverting (without any compromise) the campaign spin, not the NPOV version that wikipedia is supposed to be.  Jersyko and Tvoz are those other editors.  Furthermore, they attack me and do not "assume good faith".  On the other hand, I do not attack them even when I can see they are not being fair or objective.[[User:Annalissette|Annalissette]] 20:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
526697 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526696 +++$+++ 526696 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.177042800E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=John_Edwards&diff=124184200&oldid=124158896 again, after ERcheck's warning] <strong> +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Edwards&diff=124184200&oldid=124158896 again, after ERcheck's warning] <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 21:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
526698 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526696 +++$+++ 526697 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.177043160E09 +++$+++ I indef blocked Annalissette as an obvious sock puppet of community banned user [[User:Dereks1x|Dereks1x]]. \xb7 '''<font color=\"#709070\"> +++$+++ ::I indef blocked Annalissette as an obvious sock puppet of community banned user [[User:Dereks1x|Dereks1x]]. · '''<font color="#709070">[[User:Jersyko|j e r s y k o]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' · 21:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
526699 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526696 +++$+++ 526698 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.177050000E09 +++$+++ I did not start a checkuser for this particular sock.  However, see [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser\/Case\/Dereks1x]] for other confirmed socks (there was also a positive [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Dereks1x|suspected sock puppets case]]).  The user has a history of using socks to make the same rather unique argument that was made by Annalissette at the John Edwards article (i.e. \"listen to experts\", ignoring [[WP:NOR]], and confusingly invoking NPOV). The user even created a sock account (that was confirmed by checkuser) with false medical credentials in an effort to bolster his argument.  That sock led to the community ban at [[WP:CN|the community noticeboard]].  Aside from making an identical argument, Annalissette, like Dereks1x and socks, peculiarly focused only on reversions of his edits and comments by Tvoz and me (ignoring Maximusveritas' reversion and talk comment in this instance).  I'm happy to take this to AN, CN, or start another checkuser request if you aren't as confident (no qualms here about anyone wanting others to review my administrative judgments).  Or, if you'd rather, you're welcome to do so yourself.  Cheers. \xb7 '''<font color=\"#709070\"> +++$+++ :::I did not start a checkuser for this particular sock.  However, see [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dereks1x]] for other confirmed socks (there was also a positive [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dereks1x|suspected sock puppets case]]).  The user has a history of using socks to make the same rather unique argument that was made by Annalissette at the John Edwards article (i.e. "listen to experts", ignoring [[WP:NOR]], and confusingly invoking NPOV). The user even created a sock account (that was confirmed by checkuser) with false medical credentials in an effort to bolster his argument.  That sock led to the community ban at [[WP:CN|the community noticeboard]].  Aside from making an identical argument, Annalissette, like Dereks1x and socks, peculiarly focused only on reversions of his edits and comments by Tvoz and me (ignoring Maximusveritas' reversion and talk comment in this instance).  I'm happy to take this to AN, CN, or start another checkuser request if you aren't as confident (no qualms here about anyone wanting others to review my administrative judgments).  Or, if you'd rather, you're welcome to do so yourself.  Cheers. · '''<font color="#709070">[[User:Jersyko|j e r s y k o]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' · 23:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
526700 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526696 +++$+++ 526699 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.177054620E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that was an error on my part, I meant RFCU. \xb7 '''<font color=\"#709070\"> +++$+++ ::::Yeah, that was an error on my part, I meant RFCU. · '''<font color="#709070">[[User:Jersyko|j e r s y k o]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' · 00:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

44092 +++$+++ Colonies Chris +++$+++ Omegastar +++$+++ 44092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-16 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.297906980E09 +++$+++ In addition I've been adding diacritics, correcting unbalanced parentheses, fixing the sort keys for the categories, etc. The reader who wants a link to the full set of rulers for a particular state can find that link in the article for the specific ruler or the specific state that they're interested in.  +++$+++ In addition I've been adding diacritics, correcting unbalanced parentheses, fixing the sort keys for the categories, etc. The reader who wants a link to the full set of rulers for a particular state can find that link in the article for the specific ruler or the specific state that they're interested in. [[User:Colonies Chris|Colonies Chris]] ([[User talk:Colonies Chris|talk]]) 17:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
44093 +++$+++ Colonies Chris +++$+++ Omegastar +++$+++ 44092 +++$+++ 44092 +++$+++ 2011-02-16 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.297915680E09 +++$+++ Your comparison with removing years or the state name makes no sense because in removing the title, where the state name already implies it, I'm not taking anything away that isn't readily available; the state name and the years are essential to the stated purpose of these lists so of course they must be present.  A question that needs to be considered is 'how might any reader actually use these lists?' - how would they get to one of these lists and, and what would they be looking for? To take a year at random, look at [[List of state leaders in 1016]]. This is only linked from the preceding and following years, and from [[1016]] and from the article [[Lists of state leaders by year]], which is a list of links by year. So unless a user types the full article name - which is unlikely - they're only going to get there from other year-specific articles. It seems likely to me that a reader would be looking for information about a specific year, and probably about a specific state or region at that time. That's what these articles are for - they're an index from year and state to ruler-name. I can't see any likelihood that a reader would be looking for the complete history of a specific ruler's title.   +++$+++ :Your comparison with removing years or the state name makes no sense because in removing the title, where the state name already implies it, I'm not taking anything away that isn't readily available; the state name and the years are essential to the stated purpose of these lists so of course they must be present.  A question that needs to be considered is 'how might any reader actually use these lists?' - how would they get to one of these lists and, and what would they be looking for? To take a year at random, look at [[List of state leaders in 1016]]. This is only linked from the preceding and following years, and from [[1016]] and from the article [[Lists of state leaders by year]], which is a list of links by year. So unless a user types the full article name - which is unlikely - they're only going to get there from other year-specific articles. It seems likely to me that a reader would be looking for information about a specific year, and probably about a specific state or region at that time. That's what these articles are for - they're an index from year and state to ruler-name. I can't see any likelihood that a reader would be looking for the complete history of a specific ruler's title.  [[User:Colonies Chris|Colonies Chris]] ([[User talk:Colonies Chris|talk]]) 20:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
44094 +++$+++ Colonies Chris +++$+++ Omegastar +++$+++ 44092 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-16 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.297929480E09 +++$+++ I expect there are some cases where the link to the person doesn't exist but the link to the title does (but I haven't come across any). A good approach to that might be to create redirects from the person's name to the generic article about their title; this would provide the reader with some contextual information about that person and allow for possible expansion into a full article later.  +++$+++ ::* I expect there are some cases where the link to the person doesn't exist but the link to the title does (but I haven't come across any). A good approach to that might be to create redirects from the person's name to the generic article about their title; this would provide the reader with some contextual information about that person and allow for possible expansion into a full article later. [[User:Colonies Chris|Colonies Chris]] ([[User talk:Colonies Chris|talk]]) 23:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

262546 +++$+++ Ikkyu2 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262546 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-01 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.141273500E09 +++$+++ -<font color=\"#2000C0\"> +++$+++ -<font color="#2000C0">[[User:Ikkyu2|ikkyu2]]</font> (<font color="#00FF00">[[User_talk:Ikkyu2|talk]]</font>) 20:25, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
262547 +++$+++ Ikkyu2 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262546 +++$+++ 262546 +++$+++ 2006-03-01 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.141275480E09 +++$+++ You should look at all of them, but also know that nothing in the 2005 guideline was adopted\/ratified, and that people (me, I confess) hate it.  -<font color=\"#2000C0\"> +++$+++ :You should look at all of them, but also know that nothing in the 2005 guideline was adopted/ratified, and that people (me, I confess) hate it.  -<font color="#2000C0">[[User:Ikkyu2|ikkyu2]]</font> (<font color="#00FF00">[[User_talk:Ikkyu2|talk]]</font>) 20:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

264558 +++$+++ Edito*Magica +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-07 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.231387980E09 +++$+++ Back to the point, the tags have been removed again so i'm going to reincorporate them into the article. Tags should not be removed until issues have been resolved. Wikipedia policy.  +++$+++ Back to the point, the tags have been removed again so i'm going to reincorporate them into the article. Tags should not be removed until issues have been resolved. Wikipedia policy. [[User:Edito*Magica|Edito*Magica]] ([[User talk:Edito*Magica|talk]]) 20:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
264559 +++$+++ Edito*Magica +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264558 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.231389180E09 +++$+++ Quote from your tag \"this article is in a list format that '''''may''''' be better presented using prose.\" So not always better using prose.  +++$+++ :::Quote from your tag "this article is in a list format that '''''may''''' be better presented using prose." So not always better using prose. [[User:Edito*Magica|Edito*Magica]] ([[User talk:Edito*Magica|talk]]) 20:33, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
264560 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264558 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.231389420E09 +++$+++ Show me an article about a television programme, preferably a British sitcom, listed at [[WP:FA]] that uses such a list. I've already shown you several that doesn't.  +++$+++ :::Show me an article about a television programme, preferably a British sitcom, listed at [[WP:FA]] that uses such a list. I've already shown you several that doesn't. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

526703 +++$+++ Flyguy649 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526703 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-22 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.177278480E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I see you've now encountered the Torrisholme vandal(s)\/socks of [[user:Graham Heavy]]. They're obviously persistent, and lately they've been hitting the pages once a day or so with aged accounts to avoid the semi-protections. Unfortunately a checkuser-IPCheck showed open proxies [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser\/IP_check&oldid=121765352], so we'll just have to watch and revert. Regards,  +++$+++ Hi there. I see you've now encountered the Torrisholme vandal(s)/socks of [[user:Graham Heavy]]. They're obviously persistent, and lately they've been hitting the pages once a day or so with aged accounts to avoid the semi-protections. Unfortunately a checkuser-IPCheck showed open proxies [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/IP_check&oldid=121765352], so we'll just have to watch and revert. Regards, [[User:Flyguy649|Flyguy649]]<sup>[[User talk:Flyguy649|talk]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Flyguy649|<sub>contribs]]</sub> 14:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
526704 +++$+++ Flyguy649 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526703 +++$+++ 526703 +++$+++ 2007-04-22 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.177278960E09 +++$+++ They like to pick on {{user|SallyBoseman}}, who apparently lives there. I think they may have bothered here in real life and this lead to her recently leaving Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :They like to pick on {{user|SallyBoseman}}, who apparently lives there. I think they may have bothered here in real life and this lead to her recently leaving Wikipedia. [[User:Flyguy649|Flyguy649]]<sup>[[User talk:Flyguy649|talk]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Flyguy649|<sub>contribs]]</sub> 14:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

2418 +++$+++ TempDog123 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.309317300E09 +++$+++ Also, is it proper WP etiquette to only capitalize the first word of section headers?  Typically speaking, words in title are all capitalized except for articles, coordinate conjunctions, and prepositions (unless they're the first word).  Thanks!  +++$+++ Also, is it proper WP etiquette to only capitalize the first word of section headers?  Typically speaking, words in title are all capitalized except for articles, coordinate conjunctions, and prepositions (unless they're the first word).  Thanks! [[User:TempDog123|TempDog123]] ([[User talk:TempDog123|talk]]) 20:15, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
2419 +++$+++ TempDog123 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2418 +++$+++ 2418 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.309337940E09 +++$+++ Yeah, sounds good.  I'm sure many of your corrections were fine, but some of them were incorrect as I noted.  It was hard for me to separate them out since you edited them together at the same time.  If you do them individually instead of all at once then it should be easier to catch.  Thanks!   +++$+++ :Yeah, sounds good.  I'm sure many of your corrections were fine, but some of them were incorrect as I noted.  It was hard for me to separate them out since you edited them together at the same time.  If you do them individually instead of all at once then it should be easier to catch.  Thanks!  [[User:TempDog123|TempDog123]] ([[User talk:TempDog123|talk]]) 01:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
2420 +++$+++ TempDog123 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2418 +++$+++ 2419 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.309348680E09 +++$+++ Hello again, I made a few minor corrections to your recent edits.  Mostly grammar stuff, and I was very specific with my reasoning since you had asked about it before.  Thanks for separating your edits by section, it made it much easier to proofread.  Your edits helped improve the article.   +++$+++ ::Hello again, I made a few minor corrections to your recent edits.  Mostly grammar stuff, and I was very specific with my reasoning since you had asked about it before.  Thanks for separating your edits by section, it made it much easier to proofread.  Your edits helped improve the article.  [[User:TempDog123|TempDog123]] ([[User talk:TempDog123|talk]]) 04:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

264568 +++$+++ the_ed17 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-12 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.231811880E09 +++$+++ ...[[Bohemian Rhapsody]], an article which you have contributed extensively to, was nominated for FA (see [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Bohemian Rhapsody|this]].) \u2014'''<font face=\"Script MT Bold\">[[User:the_ed17|<font color=\"800000\">Ed]]  +++$+++ ...[[Bohemian Rhapsody]], an article which you have contributed extensively to, was nominated for FA (see [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bohemian Rhapsody|this]].) —'''<font face="Script MT Bold">[[User:the_ed17|<font color="800000">Ed]] [[User:the_ed17/N|<font color="00008B">17]] <sup>[[User talk:the_ed17|<font color="800000">(Talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/the_ed17|<font color="800000">Contribs)]]</sup></font></font face>''' 17:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
264569 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264568 +++$+++ 264568 +++$+++ 2009-01-12 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.231821540E09 +++$+++ I saw, thanks. I warned TGF in the peer review what would happen if it was nominated now.  +++$+++ :I saw, thanks. I warned TGF in the peer review what would happen if it was nominated now. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:39, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

2426 +++$+++ 71.202.152.182 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.309824120E09 +++$+++ While you're welcome to make changes to my edit, please don't \"undo\" my work again. It's rude. And please don't accuse others of fabricating information without providing specific examples. Thank you. [[Special:Contributions\/71.202.152.182|71.202.152.182]] ( +++$+++ While you're welcome to make changes to my edit, please don't "undo" my work again. It's rude. And please don't accuse others of fabricating information without providing specific examples. Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/71.202.152.182|71.202.152.182]] ([[User talk:71.202.152.182|talk]]) 17:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
2427 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2426 +++$+++ 2426 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.309834800E09 +++$+++ I want to say this again. Many of your rewriting was excellent and I did restore them. So I wasn't removing everything you did. The undo is simply a Wikipedia process that allows me to revert the edit. I did not mean to offend you. Please discuss if you still think the current state of the article is poor and hopefully we can work together. Please do not revert if you disagree. Just tell me and I can help. It is quite easy to restore an edit or parts of an edit from the page history. Thanks.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :I want to say this again. Many of your rewriting was excellent and I did restore them. So I wasn't removing everything you did. The undo is simply a Wikipedia process that allows me to revert the edit. I did not mean to offend you. Please discuss if you still think the current state of the article is poor and hopefully we can work together. Please do not revert if you disagree. Just tell me and I can help. It is quite easy to restore an edit or parts of an edit from the page history. Thanks.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 20:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
2428 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2426 +++$+++ 2426 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.309832940E09 +++$+++ (This was my initial response and it sounded less polite. So I make any another above this one.) Well, you removed several large sections in your edit without any discussion. And that is rude. And undoing such an edit is certainly reasonable given that I spent tons of time writing this article. With that said, you did some good work rewriting it and I have restored some of that. So, I didn't remove all your change. As for introducing incorrect information. I did see incorrect information in your edit. Here is an example. you changed \"Jew said that '''he had referred the owners of a chain tapioca drink shop, Quickly''', to a man named Robert Chan from land use consulting firm, Bridge Consulting, to resolve tea shop's permit issues.\" to \"Jew '''had been contacted by the owners of a local chain tapioca drink shop, Quickly''', to resolve Quickly's business permit issues.\" You change is wrong because Jew was not contacted by the owners of Quickly. It was the other way around. Jew approached the owners of Quickly. And this is just one. As for removing irrelevant info. I disagree. Procedural matters are very relevant since it gives readers great detail about his case. Just because they were resolved doesn't mean they were irrelevant. The fact that he has a brother is relevant as this is info on his family and his personal life. So you're welcome to make changes but removing large sections without justification (my work, by the way) is not okay.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :(This was my initial response and it sounded less polite. So I make any another above this one.) Well, you removed several large sections in your edit without any discussion. And that is rude. And undoing such an edit is certainly reasonable given that I spent tons of time writing this article. With that said, you did some good work rewriting it and I have restored some of that. So, I didn't remove all your change. As for introducing incorrect information. I did see incorrect information in your edit. Here is an example. you changed "Jew said that '''he had referred the owners of a chain tapioca drink shop, Quickly''', to a man named Robert Chan from land use consulting firm, Bridge Consulting, to resolve tea shop's permit issues." to "Jew '''had been contacted by the owners of a local chain tapioca drink shop, Quickly''', to resolve Quickly's business permit issues." You change is wrong because Jew was not contacted by the owners of Quickly. It was the other way around. Jew approached the owners of Quickly. And this is just one. As for removing irrelevant info. I disagree. Procedural matters are very relevant since it gives readers great detail about his case. Just because they were resolved doesn't mean they were irrelevant. The fact that he has a brother is relevant as this is info on his family and his personal life. So you're welcome to make changes but removing large sections without justification (my work, by the way) is not okay.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 19:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

526715 +++$+++ Padraig3uk +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526715 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-29 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.177877700E09 +++$+++ You removed the speedy delete tag on [[North Killiney]], I put the tag on that article as no such area exists or known in Dublin.-- +++$+++ You removed the speedy delete tag on [[North Killiney]], I put the tag on that article as no such area exists or known in Dublin.--[[User:Padraig3uk|padraig3uk]] 13:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
526716 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526715 +++$+++ 526715 +++$+++ 2007-04-29 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.177885320E09 +++$+++ Note on responses:  Responded to both editors and on article talk page.  Does not meet G1 criteria (hoaxes are specifically excluded). &mdash;  +++$+++ : Note on responses:  Responded to both editors and on article talk page.  Does not meet G1 criteria (hoaxes are specifically excluded). &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 15:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

2429 +++$+++ PumpkinSky +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2429 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.311150660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing. I've replaced the refs you mentioned. Please see my response. Thanks.  +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing. I've replaced the refs you mentioned. Please see my response. Thanks. [[User:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">Pumpkin</font><font color="darkblue">Sky</font>]] [[User talk:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">talk</font>]] 01:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
2430 +++$+++ PumpkinSky +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2429 +++$+++ 2429 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.311529200E09 +++$+++ Can you look this over and comment again? Thanks.  +++$+++ :Can you look this over and comment again? Thanks. [[User:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">Pumpkin</font><font color="darkblue">Sky</font>]] [[User talk:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">talk</font>]] 10:40, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

264574 +++$+++ Whirl*editing +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264574 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.232926440E09 +++$+++ Are you sure the image you removed is not perfectly acceptable? It is a screen shot I took of the series so doesn't belong to any organization, and from what I\u2019ve read relevant screen shots adding to an article are acceptable. I think you should have discussed your action before carrying it out.  +++$+++ Are you sure the image you removed is not perfectly acceptable? It is a screen shot I took of the series so doesn't belong to any organization, and from what I’ve read relevant screen shots adding to an article are acceptable. I think you should have discussed your action before carrying it out. [[User:Whirl*editing|Whirl*editing]] ([[User talk:Whirl*editing|talk]]) 15:34, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
264575 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264574 +++$+++ 264574 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.232934240E09 +++$+++ Having seen sitcom articles through FAC, I'm sure. Non-free images can only be used if they convey information that words couldn't express. My action was in accordance with the knowledge I possess through extensive ediing in accordance with Wikipedia's policy and guidelines, rather than ones I make up as I go along.  +++$+++ :Having seen sitcom articles through FAC, I'm sure. Non-free images can only be used if they convey information that words couldn't express. My action was in accordance with the knowledge I possess through extensive ediing in accordance with Wikipedia's policy and guidelines, rather than ones I make up as I go along. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

526719 +++$+++ Gurch +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-03 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.178244840E09 +++$+++ Emphasis mine. Your user talk page appears to have been protected since September 2006 \u2013 that seems pretty permanent to me \u2013 and the level of vandalism prior to that was ''nowhere near'' the level usually warranted for semi-protection of a page (a single user vandalizing from a single IP range). Before that one incident I don't see ''any'' anonymous edits at all for over a month. Certainly far, far less than what some of us mere mortals without the ability to protect our own talk pages at will have to deal with. Is there a good reason to keep this page protected? \u2013  +++$+++ Emphasis mine. Your user talk page appears to have been protected since September 2006 – that seems pretty permanent to me – and the level of vandalism prior to that was ''nowhere near'' the level usually warranted for semi-protection of a page (a single user vandalizing from a single IP range). Before that one incident I don't see ''any'' anonymous edits at all for over a month. Certainly far, far less than what some of us mere mortals without the ability to protect our own talk pages at will have to deal with. Is there a good reason to keep this page protected? – [[User talk:Gurch|Gurch]] 19:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
526720 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526719 +++$+++ 526719 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.178352660E09 +++$+++ Unprotected by me per request of ERcheck. +++$+++ :Unprotected by me per request of ERcheck.[[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 01:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

2432 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ Chrishmt0423 +++$+++ 2432 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.312223100E09 +++$+++ There is little else to be said beyond the usual. Please list anything you need reviewing on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup\/Reviews]], so others following the WikiCup can help, and please do help if you can by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup- points are, of course, offered for reviews at GAC. Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~jarry\/wikicup\/ here] and [[Wikipedia:WikiCup\/History\/2011\/Running totals|here]]. As ever, questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]] and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup\/Newsletter\/Send]].<\/small> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] and  +++$+++ There is little else to be said beyond the usual. Please list anything you need reviewing on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews]], so others following the WikiCup can help, and please do help if you can by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup- points are, of course, offered for reviews at GAC. Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen [http://toolserver.org/~jarry/wikicup/ here] and [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2011/Running totals|here]]. As ever, questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]] and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] and [[User:The ed17|The ed17]] 11:25, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
2433 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2432 +++$+++ 2432 +++$+++ 2010-05-09 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.273462260E09 +++$+++ All material in Wikipedia articles must be ''attributable'' to a reliable published source to show that it is not [[WP:NOR|original research]], but in practice not everything need actually be ''attributed''. This policy requires that anything '''challenged or likely to be challenged''', including all quotations, be attributed to a reliable source in the form of an [[WP:CITE#Inline citations|inline citation]], and that the source directly support the material in question. -- +++$+++ :All material in Wikipedia articles must be ''attributable'' to a reliable published source to show that it is not [[WP:NOR|original research]], but in practice not everything need actually be ''attributed''. This policy requires that anything '''challenged or likely to be challenged''', including all quotations, be attributed to a reliable source in the form of an [[WP:CITE#Inline citations|inline citation]], and that the source directly support the material in question. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 20:31, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

2434 +++$+++ Aeusoes1 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-25 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.224997860E09 +++$+++ I realized after my last edit that it might be more appropriate to discuss this in a talk page than by revert warring.  If I haven't convinced you with my curt edit summaries then let's discuss our disagreement.  \u2014  +++$+++ I realized after my last edit that it might be more appropriate to discuss this in a talk page than by revert warring.  If I haven't convinced you with my curt edit summaries then let's discuss our disagreement.  — [[User:Aeusoes1|Æµ§œš¹]] <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">[[User talk:aeusoes1|<small><sub>[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]</sub></small>]]</span> 22:11, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
2435 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2434 +++$+++ 2434 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.225078320E09 +++$+++ Produced by directing air flow through the kind of narrow space used when saying \/{{IPA|i\u02d0}}\/ (\"EE\") and directing it over the sharp edge of the teeth, in other words by keeping the tongue in the position used to say \/{{IPA|i\u02d0}}\/ (\"EE\") and instead trying to say a long \/{{IPA|\u0283}}\/ (\"SH\"). -- +++$+++ :Produced by directing air flow through the kind of narrow space used when saying /{{IPA|iː}}/ ("EE") and directing it over the sharp edge of the teeth, in other words by keeping the tongue in the position used to say /{{IPA|iː}}/ ("EE") and instead trying to say a long /{{IPA|ʃ}}/ ("SH"). --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 20:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
2436 +++$+++ Aeusoes1 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2434 +++$+++ 2434 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.225082940E09 +++$+++ I think another problem with what you're trying to do or the wording you're providing is that it doesn't really make it any clearer.  A reader may, in following the instructions, say {{IPA|[i\u0283i]}}.  \u2014  +++$+++ :I think another problem with what you're trying to do or the wording you're providing is that it doesn't really make it any clearer.  A reader may, in following the instructions, say {{IPA|[iʃi]}}.  — [[User:Aeusoes1|Æµ§œš¹]] <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">[[User talk:aeusoes1|<small><sub>[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]</sub></small>]]</span> 21:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

577510 +++$+++ TAG.Odessa +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ 577510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.157082120E09 +++$+++ IMHO, your uploaded image Robertscoble.jpg at 19:35, 31 August 2006 Zanimum vioalate [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] rules are there is no way to validate your claim on licensing. This is clearly much worse that FairUse license used on original Robert Scoble.jpg. I feel that Robert able to upload images to his blog on his own and make it clear that thouse are public domain.  +++$+++ IMHO, your uploaded image Robertscoble.jpg at 19:35, 31 August 2006 Zanimum vioalate [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] rules are there is no way to validate your claim on licensing. This is clearly much worse that FairUse license used on original Robert Scoble.jpg. I feel that Robert able to upload images to his blog on his own and make it clear that thouse are public domain. [[User:TAG.Odessa|TAG]] 20:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
577511 +++$+++ Shimgray +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ 577510 +++$+++ 577510 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.157096460E09 +++$+++ There are, in fact, ways to verify this. Zanimum, could you forward the emails giving licensing permission to permissions@wikimedia.org? We'll file it and mark permission details as confirmed.  +++$+++ :There are, in fact, ways to verify this. Zanimum, could you forward the emails giving licensing permission to permissions@wikimedia.org? We'll file it and mark permission details as confirmed. [[User:Shimgray|Shimgray]] | [[User talk:Shimgray|talk]] | 00:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
577512 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ 577510 +++$+++ 577511 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.157145480E09 +++$+++ I've forwarded the message.  --   +++$+++ :: I've forwarded the message.  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 14:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
577513 +++$+++ TAG.Odessa +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ 577510 +++$+++ 577512 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.157155980E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Not consider this personal attack - but emails are prone to forgery. But if Wikipedia is fine with thouse emails - I'm fine too. -- +++$+++ ::: Thanks. Not consider this personal attack - but emails are prone to forgery. But if Wikipedia is fine with thouse emails - I'm fine too. --[[User:TAG.Odessa|TAG]] 17:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
577514 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ 577510 +++$+++ 577513 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.157157060E09 +++$+++ Good. Why would I want to forge permission for a low-level celebrity, though?  --   +++$+++ :::: Good. Why would I want to forge permission for a low-level celebrity, though?  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 17:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
577515 +++$+++ TAG.Odessa +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ 577510 +++$+++ 577514 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.157159340E09 +++$+++ Often people do something nobody can explain ;-)  -- +++$+++ ::::: Often people do something nobody can explain ;-)  --[[User:TAG.Odessa|TAG]] 18:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
577516 +++$+++ Shimgray +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ 577510 +++$+++ 577512 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.157157780E09 +++$+++ Processed it for you. Thanks...  +++$+++ :::Processed it for you. Thanks... [[User:Shimgray|Shimgray]] | [[User talk:Shimgray|talk]] | 17:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

264582 +++$+++ 69.106.246.15 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-29 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.233225960E09 +++$+++ There is also a discussion [[WIkipedia talk:WikiProject Categories\/uncategorized#Assertion: An incorectly categorized article is an uncategorized article]]. [[Special:Contributions\/69.106.246.15|69.106.246.15]] ( +++$+++ There is also a discussion [[WIkipedia talk:WikiProject Categories/uncategorized#Assertion: An incorectly categorized article is an uncategorized article]]. [[Special:Contributions/69.106.246.15|69.106.246.15]] ([[User talk:69.106.246.15|talk]]) 02:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
264583 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264582 +++$+++ 264582 +++$+++ 2009-01-29 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.233264840E09 +++$+++ I was on new pages patrol. I put it in the parent cat so someone more knowledgeable about the topic could put it in an appropriate home. I am well aware about subcategories.That's the way I prefer to work when I'm dealing with new pages; spending time working out a category hierarchy takes time from vandal fighting, etc.   +++$+++ :I was on new pages patrol. I put it in the parent cat so someone more knowledgeable about the topic could put it in an appropriate home. I am well aware about subcategories.That's the way I prefer to work when I'm dealing with new pages; spending time working out a category hierarchy takes time from vandal fighting, etc.  [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

2439 +++$+++ Hans Adler +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-15 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.237174260E09 +++$+++ As to \"no reliable sources\", apart from those I mentioned there is also Encyclopaedia Britannica. I haven't checked a recent edition, but see [[wikisource:1911 Encyclop\xe6dia Britannica\/Old_Maid]], for example. (The title is in all caps, but it is repeated at the end.) -- +++$+++ As to "no reliable sources", apart from those I mentioned there is also Encyclopaedia Britannica. I haven't checked a recent edition, but see [[wikisource:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Old_Maid]], for example. (The title is in all caps, but it is repeated at the end.) --[[User:Hans Adler|Hans Adler]] ([[User talk:Hans Adler|talk]]) 20:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
2440 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2439 +++$+++ 2439 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.237174860E09 +++$+++ I don't think I wrote \"no reliable sources\" - in any case, what I meant was that \"reputable sources\" i.e. \"most r.s.\" use lowercase. Modern dictionaries and encyclopedias record the current most common usage, and they are quite unanimous on the question of lowercase for games as shown [http:\/\/www.onelook.com\/?loc=bm3&w=poker here] and [http:\/\/www.onelook.com\/?loc=bm3&w=canasta here] and [http:\/\/www.bartleby.com\/65\/po\/poker.html here] and in today's [http:\/\/www.britannica.com\/EBchecked\/topic\/466636\/poker Britannica]. The 1911 Britannica is not a reliable source for current English usage. -- +++$+++ :I don't think I wrote "no reliable sources" - in any case, what I meant was that "reputable sources" i.e. "most r.s." use lowercase. Modern dictionaries and encyclopedias record the current most common usage, and they are quite unanimous on the question of lowercase for games as shown [http://www.onelook.com/?loc=bm3&w=poker here] and [http://www.onelook.com/?loc=bm3&w=canasta here] and [http://www.bartleby.com/65/po/poker.html here] and in today's [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/466636/poker Britannica]. The 1911 Britannica is not a reliable source for current English usage. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 20:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
2441 +++$+++ Hans Adler +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2439 +++$+++ 2440 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.237177500E09 +++$+++ By the way, in mathematics there is a saying that concepts named after a person are capitalised (e.g. Boolean after George Boole), with the exception of very important concepts. It would seem to me that that's just a special instance of a much more general rule. E.g. a name of a group of musicians like The Beatles would stay capitalised in ordinary text except if it's very important. This might be something to mention to the fans if it comes up again. -- +++$+++ ::By the way, in mathematics there is a saying that concepts named after a person are capitalised (e.g. Boolean after George Boole), with the exception of very important concepts. It would seem to me that that's just a special instance of a much more general rule. E.g. a name of a group of musicians like The Beatles would stay capitalised in ordinary text except if it's very important. This might be something to mention to the fans if it comes up again. --[[User:Hans Adler|Hans Adler]] ([[User talk:Hans Adler|talk]]) 21:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

2442 +++$+++ James500 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-28 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.238281860E09 +++$+++ Can I take it that you agree that I have interpreted this guideline correctly?  +++$+++ Can I take it that you agree that I have interpreted this guideline correctly? [[User:James500|James500]] ([[User talk:James500|talk]]) 16:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
2443 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2442 +++$+++ 2442 +++$+++ 2009-03-28 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.238282220E09 +++$+++ Many WP articles have notes, sometimes even an entire section on usage or etymology when this is important for the article and the user. Since many users will be quite surprised or even upset about lowercase here, (especially many lawyers - look at the baroque spelling in most EULAs) we definitely need to add some kind of explanation, but please feel free to edit the info if you feel it is too long and\/or dictionary-like. -- +++$+++ :Many WP articles have notes, sometimes even an entire section on usage or etymology when this is important for the article and the user. Since many users will be quite surprised or even upset about lowercase here, (especially many lawyers - look at the baroque spelling in most EULAs) we definitely need to add some kind of explanation, but please feel free to edit the info if you feel it is too long and/or dictionary-like. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 16:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

2444 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-02 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.238695620E09 +++$+++ Hi, don't you think you were a bit strict and harsh in deleting everything in the trivia section? Are you an expert on Tampere? I'm not saying the article necessarily needs such a section, but much of the info that was there is nontrivial cultural info about Tampere and at least as well known in that city as most other info in most other articles about major cities, most of which is just as unreferenced. [[Wikipedia:Trivia_sections]] explains how to deal with trivia sections. -- +++$+++ Hi, don't you think you were a bit strict and harsh in deleting everything in the trivia section? Are you an expert on Tampere? I'm not saying the article necessarily needs such a section, but much of the info that was there is nontrivial cultural info about Tampere and at least as well known in that city as most other info in most other articles about major cities, most of which is just as unreferenced. [[Wikipedia:Trivia_sections]] explains how to deal with trivia sections. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo|talk]]) 11:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
2445 +++$+++ Soetermans +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2444 +++$+++ 2444 +++$+++ 2009-04-02 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.238703120E09 +++$+++ No, I'm not an expert on Tampere \u2013 are you? I just am familiar with a couple of guidelines on Wikipedia, the most important here being [[WP:REF]] and [[WP:TRIVIA]]. The items weren't sourced, and highly dubious as well. If you think you can add the following back into the article with appropriate sources, go right ahead. -- +++$+++ :No, I'm not an expert on Tampere – are you? I just am familiar with a couple of guidelines on Wikipedia, the most important here being [[WP:REF]] and [[WP:TRIVIA]]. The items weren't sourced, and highly dubious as well. If you think you can add the following back into the article with appropriate sources, go right ahead. --[[User:Soetermans|<small>'''Soetermans'''</small>]] | [[User talk:Soetermans|<small>'''is listening'''</small>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Soetermans|<small>'''what he'd do now?'''</small>]] 13:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
2446 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2444 +++$+++ 2445 +++$+++ 2009-04-02 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.238704860E09 +++$+++ I'm not an expert on Tampere either, but I know enough about it to be pretty sure, as i already said, that much  of the info that was there is nontrivial cultural info about Tampere. Which items did you feel were dubious? I sent you the same link, and that specifically says ''Trivia sections should not simply be removed from articles in all cases. It may be possible to integrate some items into the article text. Some facts may belong in existing sections, while others may warrant a new section. Integrate trivia items into the body of the article if appropriate.'' -- +++$+++ ::I'm not an expert on Tampere either, but I know enough about it to be pretty sure, as i already said, that much  of the info that was there is nontrivial cultural info about Tampere. Which items did you feel were dubious? I sent you the same link, and that specifically says ''Trivia sections should not simply be removed from articles in all cases. It may be possible to integrate some items into the article text. Some facts may belong in existing sections, while others may warrant a new section. Integrate trivia items into the body of the article if appropriate.'' --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 13:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
2447 +++$+++ Soetermans +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2444 +++$+++ 2446 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.238786700E09 +++$+++ First off, except for the last bit about the asteroid, none of these are [[WP:SOURCE|sourced]]. Unsourced claims can be removed without question, the tag has been up there long enough. All other items can be considered dubious without a source. Second, [[WP:BOLD|why don't you just do it yourself?]]. -- +++$+++ :::First off, except for the last bit about the asteroid, none of these are [[WP:SOURCE|sourced]]. Unsourced claims can be removed without question, the tag has been up there long enough. All other items can be considered dubious without a source. Second, [[WP:BOLD|why don't you just do it yourself?]]. --[[User:Soetermans|<small>'''Soetermans'''</small>]] | [[User talk:Soetermans|<small>'''is listening'''</small>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Soetermans|<small>'''what he'd do now?'''</small>]] 12:25, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
2448 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2444 +++$+++ 2447 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.238811360E09 +++$+++ You deleted that info because it was in a section called Trivia, which was a bad decision because it's not trivial, and for the most part not even dubious. If you use only the criterion of a missing source for deciding when to delete something, you could delete most of Wikipedia, which would be serious vandalism. Only one item was tagged, so that's the only one that should have been removed. Better and more constructive would have been to instead move that item to the talk page and ask someone with more expertise than yourself to judge if it's nonsense or in fact correct info that simply nobody has yet had time to find a reliable source for. WP:SOURCE says ''Material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source'', but it implies that you should know at least something about the topic to have at least some reason for believing something is not correct. I understand and share your concern about preventing WP from becoming a collection of incorrect hearsay, but please concentrate your efforts on the many blatant cases and avoid situations where ''you'' are in fact speculating. -- +++$+++ ::::You deleted that info because it was in a section called Trivia, which was a bad decision because it's not trivial, and for the most part not even dubious. If you use only the criterion of a missing source for deciding when to delete something, you could delete most of Wikipedia, which would be serious vandalism. Only one item was tagged, so that's the only one that should have been removed. Better and more constructive would have been to instead move that item to the talk page and ask someone with more expertise than yourself to judge if it's nonsense or in fact correct info that simply nobody has yet had time to find a reliable source for. WP:SOURCE says ''Material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source'', but it implies that you should know at least something about the topic to have at least some reason for believing something is not correct. I understand and share your concern about preventing WP from becoming a collection of incorrect hearsay, but please concentrate your efforts on the many blatant cases and avoid situations where ''you'' are in fact speculating. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 19:16, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
2449 +++$+++ Soetermans +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2444 +++$+++ 2448 +++$+++ 2009-04-04 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.238893260E09 +++$+++ That's the ever-on going discussion on Wikipedia, isn't it? Should ''everything'' be sourced, or just the information that might seem dubious? When should something be sourced? I read in an another discussion that another Wikipedian insisted to have a scientific medical source to the claim \"the common human has five fingers\". Even though I do not agree with your point of view, in the future I first shall move all information listed under a trivia section to the corresponding talk page. -- +++$+++ :::::That's the ever-on going discussion on Wikipedia, isn't it? Should ''everything'' be sourced, or just the information that might seem dubious? When should something be sourced? I read in an another discussion that another Wikipedian insisted to have a scientific medical source to the claim "the common human has five fingers". Even though I do not agree with your point of view, in the future I first shall move all information listed under a trivia section to the corresponding talk page. --[[User:Soetermans|<small>'''Soetermans'''</small>]] | [[User talk:Soetermans|<small>'''is listening'''</small>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Soetermans|<small>'''what he'd do now?'''</small>]] 18:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
2450 +++$+++ Soetermans +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2444 +++$+++ 2449 +++$+++ 2009-04-26 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.240767000E09 +++$+++ [[Talk:Made (2001 film)|As promised]] :-). -- +++$+++ ::::::[[Talk:Made (2001 film)|As promised]] :-). --[[User:Soetermans|<small>'''Soetermans'''</small>]] | [[User talk:Soetermans|<small>'''is listening'''</small>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Soetermans|<small>'''what he'd do now?'''</small>]] 10:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

264589 +++$+++ 88.105.215.159 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-28 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.235872320E09 +++$+++ I did write to the BBC at the time (oh how I wish I still had their reply!) and was told that 1. they had had many letters on this subject, making the same point and 2. they tended to disregard December's sales when it came to compiling the list of the year due to tardy returns and the need for preparing the show in advance. However, they also (I remember) promised to make changes so that this \"anomaly\" would not occur again. And indeed, they were clearly as good as their word, as bizarre exclusions such as Bo Rap never occurred again. Sadly, my letter to them was in New Year 1976, and I didn't write again a year later when the same thing occurred vis a vis Bo Rap, so I never got to hear their reasons for the song's exclusion from the 1976 best seller lists. [[Special:Contributions\/88.105.215.159|88.105.215.159]] ( +++$+++ I did write to the BBC at the time (oh how I wish I still had their reply!) and was told that 1. they had had many letters on this subject, making the same point and 2. they tended to disregard December's sales when it came to compiling the list of the year due to tardy returns and the need for preparing the show in advance. However, they also (I remember) promised to make changes so that this "anomaly" would not occur again. And indeed, they were clearly as good as their word, as bizarre exclusions such as Bo Rap never occurred again. Sadly, my letter to them was in New Year 1976, and I didn't write again a year later when the same thing occurred vis a vis Bo Rap, so I never got to hear their reasons for the song's exclusion from the 1976 best seller lists. [[Special:Contributions/88.105.215.159|88.105.215.159]] ([[User talk:88.105.215.159|talk]]) 17:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
264590 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264589 +++$+++ 264589 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.235885580E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your detailed response. Does Tony Jasper specifically comment that \"BR\" was overlooked? We must be very careful about wording to avoid [[WP:OR|original research]]. If he doesn't, we could have pointed out that despite its chart postilion it didn't make BBC's chart. No adjectives; no editorial comment (e.g. \"bizarrely\"). We also need a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] to verify it wasn't on the BBC's chart; Geocities sites are not usually considered reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. If you have a look at [[WP:RS]]you will see that those standards are quite strict! I applaud your persistence in writing to the Beeb, though! That's the sort of anal thing I would do.  +++$+++ :Thank you for your detailed response. Does Tony Jasper specifically comment that "BR" was overlooked? We must be very careful about wording to avoid [[WP:OR|original research]]. If he doesn't, we could have pointed out that despite its chart postilion it didn't make BBC's chart. No adjectives; no editorial comment (e.g. "bizarrely"). We also need a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] to verify it wasn't on the BBC's chart; Geocities sites are not usually considered reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. If you have a look at [[WP:RS]]you will see that those standards are quite strict! I applaud your persistence in writing to the Beeb, though! That's the sort of anal thing I would do. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:33, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
264591 +++$+++ 88.105.215.159 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264589 +++$+++ 264590 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.235894760E09 +++$+++ And no, Tony Jasper, writing in 1987, did not make an assertion about Bohemian Rhapsody in the year's best sellers, though in his introduction to the year, he states : \"The last three months saw one of the biggest selling singles for years with Queen's 'Bohemian Rhapsody' ...\", which sits a little uneasily with its non-appearance in the chart - though it is also fair to say that TJ makes no comment about chart placings in his book, only giving a \"pop summary\" as an introduction to each year. [[Special:Contributions\/88.105.215.159|88.105.215.159]] ( +++$+++ ::And no, Tony Jasper, writing in 1987, did not make an assertion about Bohemian Rhapsody in the year's best sellers, though in his introduction to the year, he states : "The last three months saw one of the biggest selling singles for years with Queen's 'Bohemian Rhapsody' ...", which sits a little uneasily with its non-appearance in the chart - though it is also fair to say that TJ makes no comment about chart placings in his book, only giving a "pop summary" as an introduction to each year. [[Special:Contributions/88.105.215.159|88.105.215.159]] ([[User talk:88.105.215.159|talk]]) 00:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
264592 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264589 +++$+++ 264591 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.235934720E09 +++$+++ We've had some classic incidences of the phenomenon to which you refer. Some rogue editor had cheekily inserted the (not incredible) assertion that [[Ronnie Hazlehurst]] wrote S Club 7's hit \"Reach\". When the composer died, at least two national newspapers were caught out using Wikipedia as a source, as their obituaries both contained this incorrect fact. ''Then'', others wanted to retain the credit because they had two supporting reliable sources. I think common sense prevails in the end.<br\/>The problem with anecdotal evidence is reliability. How do we ensure independence? Ten \"independent\" users might show up offering to corroborate a story. What is to stop me contacting a handful of people on my FaceBook list, or a forum, saying \"do me a favour, and just copy and paste this backing me up, as if you'd written it.\" I think it's the same with supposedly democratic radio phone-ins, where public opinion is alleged to be gauged, but that's taking us away from \"BR\"! At the end of the day, if it's a reliable source, then someone (rather than an anonymous Wikipedia editor) is accountable along with their publishing company.  +++$+++ :::We've had some classic incidences of the phenomenon to which you refer. Some rogue editor had cheekily inserted the (not incredible) assertion that [[Ronnie Hazlehurst]] wrote S Club 7's hit "Reach". When the composer died, at least two national newspapers were caught out using Wikipedia as a source, as their obituaries both contained this incorrect fact. ''Then'', others wanted to retain the credit because they had two supporting reliable sources. I think common sense prevails in the end.<br/>The problem with anecdotal evidence is reliability. How do we ensure independence? Ten "independent" users might show up offering to corroborate a story. What is to stop me contacting a handful of people on my FaceBook list, or a forum, saying "do me a favour, and just copy and paste this backing me up, as if you'd written it." I think it's the same with supposedly democratic radio phone-ins, where public opinion is alleged to be gauged, but that's taking us away from "BR"! At the end of the day, if it's a reliable source, then someone (rather than an anonymous Wikipedia editor) is accountable along with their publishing company. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

526736 +++$+++ 86.3.80.223 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-08 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.178670720E09 +++$+++ Actually they were not test edits. Congratulations for foolishly reverting them and removing my contributions, which would have been of use to others.  +++$+++ Actually they were not test edits. Congratulations for foolishly reverting them and removing my contributions, which would have been of use to others. [[User:86.3.80.223|86.3.80.223]] 17:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
526737 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526736 +++$+++ 526736 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.178694420E09 +++$+++ <s>Ok, let's call them vandalism.<\/s> &mdash;  +++$+++ : <s>Ok, let's call them vandalism.</s> &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 00:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
526738 +++$+++ 86.3.80.223 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526736 +++$+++ 526737 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.178762160E09 +++$+++ <s>..or rather legitimate contributions, as my first message implies. I don't know how you could class them as vandalism when I did not cause any harm to the article; I added a few extra schools. If you wish to call that vandalism then I suggest you reconsider your perception of the definition of the word. Still, this was two months ago. I'll let you get back to reverting articles and removing data while incorrectly accusing its authors of vandalism. Goodbye<\/s>  +++$+++ :: <s>..or rather legitimate contributions, as my first message implies. I don't know how you could class them as vandalism when I did not cause any harm to the article; I added a few extra schools. If you wish to call that vandalism then I suggest you reconsider your perception of the definition of the word. Still, this was two months ago. I'll let you get back to reverting articles and removing data while incorrectly accusing its authors of vandalism. Goodbye</s> [[User:86.3.80.223|86.3.80.223]] 18:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
526739 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526736 +++$+++ 526738 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.178773320E09 +++$+++ Response on talk page. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::: Response on talk page. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 22:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
526740 +++$+++ 86.3.80.223 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526736 +++$+++ 526739 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.179455940E09 +++$+++ Situation resolved. Apologies for the hot headedness.  +++$+++ :::: Situation resolved. Apologies for the hot headedness. [[User:86.3.80.223|86.3.80.223]] 19:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

264593 +++$+++ Bradley0110 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-06 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.236406740E09 +++$+++ Since you're the \"primary editor\" of Moffat-related articles, I thought I'd run this by you: Would it be worth removing the [[:Category:Screenplays by Steven Moffat]] from the bottom of the TV series articles and moving it to the respective List of ... episodes instead? My reason being that entire TV series aren't really single screenplays like the category name implies, and the category currently has a mixture of entire series (''Coupling'', ''Chalk'', ''et al'') and single episodes (the ''Doctor Who'' eps). A single \"Television series by Steven Moffat\" template could then be created to unify the TV series articles.  +++$+++ Since you're the "primary editor" of Moffat-related articles, I thought I'd run this by you: Would it be worth removing the [[:Category:Screenplays by Steven Moffat]] from the bottom of the TV series articles and moving it to the respective List of ... episodes instead? My reason being that entire TV series aren't really single screenplays like the category name implies, and the category currently has a mixture of entire series (''Coupling'', ''Chalk'', ''et al'') and single episodes (the ''Doctor Who'' eps). A single "Television series by Steven Moffat" template could then be created to unify the TV series articles. [[User:Bradley0110|Bradley0110]] ([[User talk:Bradley0110|talk]]) 22:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
264594 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264593 +++$+++ 264593 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.236410280E09 +++$+++ I agree, yes. I've never been fond of that category for the very reason you mention. 'Screenplay' is quite a specific term.  +++$+++ :I agree, yes. I've never been fond of that category for the very reason you mention. 'Screenplay' is quite a specific term. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

264595 +++$+++ Sunset2007b +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264595 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-14 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.237042260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Sunset2007b|Sunset2007b]] ([[User talk:Sunset2007b|talk]]) 07:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
264596 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264595 +++$+++ 264595 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.237051620E09 +++$+++ I'll keep an eye on it. There are a couple of anonymous users with a Steinman agenda. They have the mentality of the lot on the Rockman forum (you'll see them try to delegitimate ''Bat III''', etc.).  +++$+++ :I'll keep an eye on it. There are a couple of anonymous users with a Steinman agenda. They have the mentality of the lot on the Rockman forum (you'll see them try to delegitimate ''Bat III''', etc.). [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

2452 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-08 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.239215580E09 +++$+++ Yes, it's '''a''' SWAT team, which means '''a''' special weapons and tactics team. The indefinite article shows it's a common noun, which should definitely be spelled lowercase, as shown by the sources. For example the Bigtown SWAT Team is a proper noun, so if its official name doesn't use (only) the acronym, it's the Bigtown Special Weapons and Tactics Team. -- +++$+++ Yes, it's '''a''' SWAT team, which means '''a''' special weapons and tactics team. The indefinite article shows it's a common noun, which should definitely be spelled lowercase, as shown by the sources. For example the Bigtown SWAT Team is a proper noun, so if its official name doesn't use (only) the acronym, it's the Bigtown Special Weapons and Tactics Team. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 11:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
2453 +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2452 +++$+++ 2452 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.239215940E09 +++$+++ I disagree and you've violated the 3R by reverting yet again. Apparently you aren't willing to discuss things before reverting myself and another editor. Oh well, I tried to discuss........  +++$+++ *I disagree and you've violated the 3R by reverting yet again. Apparently you aren't willing to discuss things before reverting myself and another editor. Oh well, I tried to discuss........ [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 11:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
2454 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2452 +++$+++ 2453 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.239216240E09 +++$+++ I hope you agree it was OK to add the sources, which the other editor apparently hadn't seen, so I wasn't actually reverting. You'll have to find a source for your opinion, and the two biggest US dictionaries prove you're simply wrong, although many people erroneously think all acronyms should be uppercased when written out, so you've often seen it wrong in less reliable sources. -- +++$+++ ::I hope you agree it was OK to add the sources, which the other editor apparently hadn't seen, so I wasn't actually reverting. You'll have to find a source for your opinion, and the two biggest US dictionaries prove you're simply wrong, although many people erroneously think all acronyms should be uppercased when written out, so you've often seen it wrong in less reliable sources. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 11:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
2455 +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2452 +++$+++ 2452 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.239216540E09 +++$+++ When did Bartlby become one of the 2 biggest? Random House certainly qualifies as a major one: \"a special section of some law enforcement agencies trained and equipped to deal with especially dangerous or violent situations, as when hostages are being held (often used attributively): a SWAT team.\". You know what? I'm not going to debate it with you. Obviously others are starting to take issue with it too. I'll let them argue it with you.  +++$+++ *When did Bartlby become one of the 2 biggest? Random House certainly qualifies as a major one: "a special section of some law enforcement agencies trained and equipped to deal with especially dangerous or violent situations, as when hostages are being held (often used attributively): a SWAT team.". You know what? I'm not going to debate it with you. Obviously others are starting to take issue with it too. I'll let them argue it with you. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 11:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
2456 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2452 +++$+++ 2455 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.239217620E09 +++$+++ Bartleby publishes American Heritage Dictionary, and the other source is Merriam-Webster; both are definitely among the most reputable. When they spell something that way, you can be sure that most of the huge number of citations from reputable sources they have in their databases spell it that way. Modern dictionaries describe current usage; they don't dictate it. When usage changes, they change their entries too. -- +++$+++ :: Bartleby publishes American Heritage Dictionary, and the other source is Merriam-Webster; both are definitely among the most reputable. When they spell something that way, you can be sure that most of the huge number of citations from reputable sources they have in their databases spell it that way. Modern dictionaries describe current usage; they don't dictate it. When usage changes, they change their entries too. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 12:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
2457 +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2452 +++$+++ 2452 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.239217800E09 +++$+++ I see you finally changed to reflect that you are talking about Am Heritage. Fine. But I see others are starting to disagree too. As I said, I'll let them get into it. I have nothing further to say on the matter.  +++$+++ *I see you finally changed to reflect that you are talking about Am Heritage. Fine. But I see others are starting to disagree too. As I said, I'll let them get into it. I have nothing further to say on the matter. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 12:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

264598 +++$+++ Goku1st +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264598 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-22 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.237739340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Goku1st|Goku1st]] ([[User talk:Goku1st|talk]]) 09:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
264599 +++$+++ Kittins floating in the sky yay +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264598 +++$+++ 264598 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.237832820E09 +++$+++ Ah so it's a case of conflict of interest that you're censoring AFDs and abusing admin powers to protect, it makes sense now. -- +++$+++ :Ah so it's a case of conflict of interest that you're censoring AFDs and abusing admin powers to protect, it makes sense now. --[[User:Kittins floating in the sky yay|Kittins floating in the sky yay]] ([[User talk:Kittins floating in the sky yay|talk]]) 11:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
264600 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264598 +++$+++ 264599 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.237832880E09 +++$+++ [[WP:DICK|Don't be a dick]].  +++$+++ ::[[WP:DICK|Don't be a dick]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:28, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

264601 +++$+++ A pinhead +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-24 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.237959300E09 +++$+++ Hi can you restore the edits you deleted at [[Pat Condell]] back in August 2007. Thank you.-- +++$+++ Hi can you restore the edits you deleted at [[Pat Condell]] back in August 2007. Thank you.--[[User:A pinhead|A pinhead]] ([[User talk:A pinhead|talk]]) 22:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
264602 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264601 +++$+++ 264601 +++$+++ 2009-03-24 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.237959720E09 +++$+++ The version of the article I deleted on 20 August 2007 contains nothing of any value, particularly in relation to the developed version that has taken its place, which now establishes notability.  +++$+++ :The version of the article I deleted on 20 August 2007 contains nothing of any value, particularly in relation to the developed version that has taken its place, which now establishes notability. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
264603 +++$+++ A pinhead +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264601 +++$+++ 264602 +++$+++ 2009-03-24 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.237961280E09 +++$+++ But it may be useful.-- +++$+++ ::But it may be useful.--[[User:A pinhead|A pinhead]] ([[User talk:A pinhead|talk]]) 23:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
264604 +++$+++ A pinhead +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264601 +++$+++ 264602 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.237966740E09 +++$+++ I will give you a barnstar of your choice if you get [[Pat Condell]] to good article status.-- +++$+++ ::I will give you a barnstar of your choice if you get [[Pat Condell]] to good article status.--[[User:A pinhead|A pinhead]] ([[User talk:A pinhead|talk]]) 00:39, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

526746 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-16 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.179370680E09 +++$+++ Just wanted you to know that I have started on the \"ESG\" article.  +++$+++ Just wanted you to know that I have started on the "ESG" article. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 19:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
526747 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526746 +++$+++ 526746 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.179399900E09 +++$+++ [[Expeditionary Strike Group]] - This one's for you. Hope you like it.  +++$+++ *[[Expeditionary Strike Group]] - This one's for you. Hope you like it. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

2459 +++$+++ TomHennell +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-10 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.244703120E09 +++$+++ I have reverted your link the ABS text of the KJV Bible.  There is already a link to the Wikisource text for this work; there is no point in having two, Wikipedia is not a directory of web links.  In addition, you may not have noticed that the site you linked to (not unusually for biblical sites) omits the books of the Apocrypha - and consequently does not provide the full KJV text.    +++$+++ I have reverted your link the ABS text of the KJV Bible.  There is already a link to the Wikisource text for this work; there is no point in having two, Wikipedia is not a directory of web links.  In addition, you may not have noticed that the site you linked to (not unusually for biblical sites) omits the books of the Apocrypha - and consequently does not provide the full KJV text.   [[User:TomHennell|TomHennell]] ([[User talk:TomHennell|talk]]) 23:52, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
2460 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2459 +++$+++ 2459 +++$+++ 2009-06-11 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.244733600E09 +++$+++ And since Wikisource isn't searchable, i still believe the Bartleby link provides users with a valuable service not provided by the current links. If we can find a searchable online version including the Apocrypha, that would of course be better than the Bartleby site. -- +++$+++ :And since Wikisource isn't searchable, i still believe the Bartleby link provides users with a valuable service not provided by the current links. If we can find a searchable online version including the Apocrypha, that would of course be better than the Bartleby site. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 08:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
2461 +++$+++ TomHennell +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2459 +++$+++ 2460 +++$+++ 2009-06-11 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.244737980E09 +++$+++ I take your point about labeling the Wikisource: though I am not sure how readily it can be remedied.  The Studylight.org site is for the present the best of the biblical comparitor sites - it provides a very wide variety of versions in English across a range of dates, plus a number of the key comparitor texts from versions in other languages.  For the KJV it provides both the 1611 (original spelling) edition, and the 1769 (standard spelling) edition; which is also the text on Wikisource and your ABS site.  For that reason it is understandable that it should be listed first (at least unless a better site becomes available). The ABS site that you linked to claims to be searchable, but fatally undermines this by not providing a full text.  Hence if the verse you are looking for is from the Apocrypha (e.g. \"let us now praise famous men\") the ABS site won't find it. There are indeed some Christian traditions that so reject the Apocryphal books that they prefer not to find their texts on a biblical site, but Wikipedia should be edited from the perspective of a general reader.  +++$+++ :: I take your point about labeling the Wikisource: though I am not sure how readily it can be remedied.  The Studylight.org site is for the present the best of the biblical comparitor sites - it provides a very wide variety of versions in English across a range of dates, plus a number of the key comparitor texts from versions in other languages.  For the KJV it provides both the 1611 (original spelling) edition, and the 1769 (standard spelling) edition; which is also the text on Wikisource and your ABS site.  For that reason it is understandable that it should be listed first (at least unless a better site becomes available). The ABS site that you linked to claims to be searchable, but fatally undermines this by not providing a full text.  Hence if the verse you are looking for is from the Apocrypha (e.g. "let us now praise famous men") the ABS site won't find it. There are indeed some Christian traditions that so reject the Apocryphal books that they prefer not to find their texts on a biblical site, but Wikipedia should be edited from the perspective of a general reader. [[User:TomHennell|TomHennell]] ([[User talk:TomHennell|talk]]) 09:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
2462 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2459 +++$+++ 2461 +++$+++ 2009-06-11 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.244752620E09 +++$+++ Interestingly, \"my\" site doesn't seem to say anything about what the version is and from what year. Instead, it confusingly or perhaps purposely misleadingly says \"the culmination of English translations of the Bible, the Bartleby.com publication of the American Bible Society\u2019s King James Version\", which sounded to a layperson like me as if it's some modernised version, and that misleading\/incorrect hype is only compounded by saying it's from 1999 [http:\/\/www.bartleby.com\/br\/108.html here]. -- +++$+++ :::Interestingly, "my" site doesn't seem to say anything about what the version is and from what year. Instead, it confusingly or perhaps purposely misleadingly says "the culmination of English translations of the Bible, the Bartleby.com publication of the American Bible Society’s King James Version", which sounded to a layperson like me as if it's some modernised version, and that misleading/incorrect hype is only compounded by saying it's from 1999 [http://www.bartleby.com/br/108.html here]. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 13:37, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

526748 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526748 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-17 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.179463200E09 +++$+++ At first I couldn't see it, but now that I've taken a closer look I see what you mean.  Now, I wonder, who was the first most decorated PR soldier in WW II?  +++$+++ At first I couldn't see it, but now that I've taken a closer look I see what you mean.  Now, I wonder, who was the first most decorated PR soldier in WW II? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 21:40, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
526749 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526748 +++$+++ 526748 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.179465600E09 +++$+++ Another thing, maybe he was the second in all of the US during WW II, but the person who posted the info may have expressed him\/herself incorrectly. Who knows? The thing is that what you rephrased in the article \"is\" the best way to go. I went on and fixed every link related to Calero.  +++$+++ *Another thing, maybe he was the second in all of the US during WW II, but the person who posted the info may have expressed him/herself incorrectly. Who knows? The thing is that what you rephrased in the article "is" the best way to go. I went on and fixed every link related to Calero. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 22:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

264606 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264606 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-30 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.238402400E09 +++$+++ A bit late, but I noticed your comment [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Kittins_floating_in_the_sky_yay&diff=prev&oldid=279128268 here]. I think you are referring to the first AfD there, when you say \"yesterday\", but that AfD was 22 March ''2007'', not 22 March 2009. That had me confused for a bit until I realised how confusing the dates were.  +++$+++ A bit late, but I noticed your comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kittins_floating_in_the_sky_yay&diff=prev&oldid=279128268 here]. I think you are referring to the first AfD there, when you say "yesterday", but that AfD was 22 March ''2007'', not 22 March 2009. That had me confused for a bit until I realised how confusing the dates were. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 01:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
264607 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264606 +++$+++ 264606 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.238447700E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I spotted that after-the-fact. It was the 22 March bit that confused my little brain (+ an assumption that the day she departed this mortal coil would have attracted someone to nominate it for AfD). No harm done: an AfD doesn't have a chance of succeeding. Despite a few minor clean ups to the references, I consider myself neutral enough to make that call.  +++$+++ :Yeah, I spotted that after-the-fact. It was the 22 March bit that confused my little brain (+ an assumption that the day she departed this mortal coil would have attracted someone to nominate it for AfD). No harm done: an AfD doesn't have a chance of succeeding. Despite a few minor clean ups to the references, I consider myself neutral enough to make that call. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

2463 +++$+++ Radiopathy +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-25 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.245943200E09 +++$+++ Would you kindly point out the sources which you claim I'm missing? I could very well be overlooking something and reverting by mistake.  As it stands, however, the article is a poster child for [[WP:OR]] and needs serious cleanup; more sources and inline citations, especially.  <b> +++$+++ Would you kindly point out the sources which you claim I'm missing? I could very well be overlooking something and reverting by mistake.  As it stands, however, the article is a poster child for [[WP:OR]] and needs serious cleanup; more sources and inline citations, especially.  <b>[[User:Radiopathy|<font color="#006600">R</font><font color="#0D8147">ad</font><font color="#009966">io</font><font color="#009999">pa</font><font color="#1E99CC">th</font><font color="#67B2DE ">y</font>]]</b> [[User talk:Radiopathy|•talk•]]   08:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
2464 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2463 +++$+++ 2463 +++$+++ 2009-06-25 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.245943800E09 +++$+++ Hi, as explained in the edit summary, the sources are in references 23 to 27. You removed the entire section beginning \"In conditional sentences, US spoken usage...\" even though these references are clearly included in that section. Similarly, there is no reason to remove, for example, the section ''Recently, the American use of ''just'' with simple past has made inroads into BrE, most visibly in advertising slogans and headlines such as \"Cable broadband just got faster\".'' unless you have serious reasons to doubt the existence of this ad and, in fact, the honesty of whoever added this information. In addition, at least some of your {fact|date=June 2009}} additions seem to be uncalled for and at the very least exaggerated. -- +++$+++ :Hi, as explained in the edit summary, the sources are in references 23 to 27. You removed the entire section beginning "In conditional sentences, US spoken usage..." even though these references are clearly included in that section. Similarly, there is no reason to remove, for example, the section ''Recently, the American use of ''just'' with simple past has made inroads into BrE, most visibly in advertising slogans and headlines such as "Cable broadband just got faster".'' unless you have serious reasons to doubt the existence of this ad and, in fact, the honesty of whoever added this information. In addition, at least some of your {fact|date=June 2009}} additions seem to be uncalled for and at the very least exaggerated. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 08:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
2465 +++$+++ Radiopathy +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2463 +++$+++ 2464 +++$+++ 2009-06-27 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.246102260E09 +++$+++ Second, this isn't about trusting someone's honesty, or believing that a particular advert actually exists.  Please read up on [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:V]]; if someone wants to include a mention of a particular Americanism that has crept into British English, he needs to present a verifiable, reliable source to back up his claim, otherwise his contribution ''can be removed''. <b> +++$+++ ::Second, this isn't about trusting someone's honesty, or believing that a particular advert actually exists.  Please read up on [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:V]]; if someone wants to include a mention of a particular Americanism that has crept into British English, he needs to present a verifiable, reliable source to back up his claim, otherwise his contribution ''can be removed''. <b>[[User:Radiopathy|<font color="#006600">R</font><font color="#0D8147">ad</font><font color="#009966">io</font><font color="#009999">pa</font><font color="#1E99CC">th</font><font color="#67B2DE ">y</font>]]</b> [[User talk:Radiopathy|•talk•]]   04:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

264610 +++$+++ Bradley0110 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264610 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-09 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.239321900E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Robert_Bathurst&diff=282629797&oldid=282147478 Did he find the picture unflattering?]  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Bathurst&diff=282629797&oldid=282147478 Did he find the picture unflattering?] [[User:Bradley0110|Bradley0110]] ([[User talk:Bradley0110|talk]]) 17:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
264611 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264610 +++$+++ 264610 +++$+++ 2009-04-09 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.239323040E09 +++$+++ Replied by private email.  +++$+++ :Replied by private email. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:24, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
264612 +++$+++ Bradley0110 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264610 +++$+++ 264611 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.239379020E09 +++$+++ Ah!  +++$+++ ::Ah! [[User:Bradley0110|Bradley0110]] ([[User talk:Bradley0110|talk]]) 08:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

2467 +++$+++ Karljoos +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-24 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.251106320E09 +++$+++ Next time you want to move or rename a category please discuss it first, if you don't mind. ''Hochschule'' means, literally \"high school\", so if you want to be precise, the word \"University\" wouldn't be the precise word. Also, keep in mind, that until recent times, German hochschules offered only one official academic degree (Diplom) - something between a bachelor and a master -, and that other post-diplom courses had no official value. Also, there's a german word for university ''Universit\xe4t''. I am reverting your changes. If you want to chamge the name, please [[talk:Felix Mendelssohn College of Music and Theatre|discuss]] it first. -- +++$+++ Next time you want to move or rename a category please discuss it first, if you don't mind. ''Hochschule'' means, literally "high school", so if you want to be precise, the word "University" wouldn't be the precise word. Also, keep in mind, that until recent times, German hochschules offered only one official academic degree (Diplom) - something between a bachelor and a master -, and that other post-diplom courses had no official value. Also, there's a german word for university ''Universität''. I am reverting your changes. If you want to chamge the name, please [[talk:Felix Mendelssohn College of Music and Theatre|discuss]] it first. --[[User:Karljoos|Karljoos]] ([[User talk:Karljoos|talk]]) 02:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
2468 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2467 +++$+++ 2467 +++$+++ 2009-08-24 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.251118800E09 +++$+++ This is all nonsense; please look at that discussion page. -- +++$+++ :This is all nonsense; please look at that discussion page. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 06:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

526756 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.179811380E09 +++$+++ You are right about him being the first. I think the intro was once copyedited by User:Brookie. Could you do me a favor and fix it with the citation? Thanks.  +++$+++ You are right about him being the first. I think the intro was once copyedited by User:Brookie. Could you do me a favor and fix it with the citation? Thanks. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 22:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
526757 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526756 +++$+++ 526756 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.179814980E09 +++$+++ Thanks! The image thing has kept me busy.  Waht a waste of intellectual time (smile).  +++$+++ *Thanks! The image thing has kept me busy.  Waht a waste of intellectual time (smile). [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

264614 +++$+++ Ammera +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-27 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.240871400E09 +++$+++ I am very familiar with [[WP:OWN]] and [[WP:FICT]] thank you very much. The only reason your nominating that article for delation is because your not getting your own way with the tagging of it plain and simple. Well trust me, if that article is deleted it wont last for long i can tell you that for nothing.  +++$+++ I am very familiar with [[WP:OWN]] and [[WP:FICT]] thank you very much. The only reason your nominating that article for delation is because your not getting your own way with the tagging of it plain and simple. Well trust me, if that article is deleted it wont last for long i can tell you that for nothing. [[User:Ammera|Ammera]] ([[User talk:Ammera|talk]]) 15:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
264615 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264614 +++$+++ 264614 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.240871580E09 +++$+++ Please assume good faith. I have expressed my reasons for nominating the article, in accordance with our policy and guidelines. You may be familiar with our guidelines, but your discourse suggests to me that you are choosing to ignore them.  +++$+++ :Please assume good faith. I have expressed my reasons for nominating the article, in accordance with our policy and guidelines. You may be familiar with our guidelines, but your discourse suggests to me that you are choosing to ignore them. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
264616 +++$+++ Ammera +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264614 +++$+++ 264615 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.240872300E09 +++$+++ Stop telling me to \"assume good faith\" - im furious with you, how can i assume good faith when i dont agree with you??? That article is within the same boundaries as ANY article on a fictional character of a soap or series and can only be worked on as the character progresses in time - thats how it works. And it's not me choosing to ignore the guidelines. As a mod that's your job because in my experiance of Wikipedia, its the mods who break the rules more than the average user, especially if they don't get their own way! And for the record, i will be making my feelings on this clear when i put in an officialy complaint.  +++$+++ :: Stop telling me to "assume good faith" - im furious with you, how can i assume good faith when i dont agree with you??? That article is within the same boundaries as ANY article on a fictional character of a soap or series and can only be worked on as the character progresses in time - thats how it works. And it's not me choosing to ignore the guidelines. As a mod that's your job because in my experiance of Wikipedia, its the mods who break the rules more than the average user, especially if they don't get their own way! And for the record, i will be making my feelings on this clear when i put in an officialy complaint. [[User:Ammera|Ammera]] ([[User talk:Ammera|talk]]) 15:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

526760 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526760 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-24 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.180000980E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on bringing [[3rd Battalion 3rd Marines]] to featured status! &mdash;  +++$+++ Congratulations on bringing [[3rd Battalion 3rd Marines]] to featured status! &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 03:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
526761 +++$+++ Palm dogg +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526760 +++$+++ 526760 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.180003080E09 +++$+++ Well, definite thanks to you and Looper for helping me get some direction and proofread the article.  +++$+++ :Well, definite thanks to you and Looper for helping me get some direction and proofread the article. [[User:Palm dogg|Palm_Dogg]] 03:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

264617 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-03 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.241403960E09 +++$+++ Please revert your close of [[Balanced ball]] A7 does not apply to products and never did. It appliest o only a \" real person, an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content\". The policy at [[WP:CSD]]  is absolutely clear on this.  ''' +++$+++ Please revert your close of [[Balanced ball]] A7 does not apply to products and never did. It appliest o only a " real person, an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content". The policy at [[WP:CSD]]  is absolutely clear on this.  '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 19:26, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
264618 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264617 +++$+++ 264617 +++$+++ 2009-05-03 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.241406660E09 +++$+++ It includes web pages. That game is only available via the website. The article has no independent sources establishing notability.  +++$+++ :It includes web pages. That game is only available via the website. The article has no independent sources establishing notability. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

2475 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2475 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-27 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.272412260E09 +++$+++ Hi. You tagged [[Polish nobility]] with <nowiki>{{db-move|Szlachta}}<\/nowiki>, and I made the move, thinking it was agreed and I was being helpful. I have now been asked by {{user1|Piotrus}} to undo it. Can you please discuss with him, if necessary with a wider discussion on the article talk page to reach a consensus? I have no opinion on the matter myself, and will undo my move if that is what is agreed. Regards,  +++$+++ Hi. You tagged [[Polish nobility]] with <nowiki>{{db-move|Szlachta}}</nowiki>, and I made the move, thinking it was agreed and I was being helpful. I have now been asked by {{user1|Piotrus}} to undo it. Can you please discuss with him, if necessary with a wider discussion on the article talk page to reach a consensus? I have no opinion on the matter myself, and will undo my move if that is what is agreed. Regards, [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 16:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
2476 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2475 +++$+++ 2475 +++$+++ 2010-04-27 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.272427860E09 +++$+++ And Norman Davies specifically says [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=b912JnKpYTkC&pg=PA160&lpg=PA160&dq=%22szlachta+is+habitually+translated+as&source=bl&ots=AFopF6kmXy&sig=CjPIiAzyMzfuyYNAKZr38crPgjo&hl=en&ei=YUnXS9qmGNKaOO3WyOQG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22szlachta%20is%20habitually%20translated%20as&f=false here] that \"\/szlachta\/ should be translated as 'nobility'\"  -- +++$+++ :And Norman Davies specifically says [http://books.google.com/books?id=b912JnKpYTkC&pg=PA160&lpg=PA160&dq=%22szlachta+is+habitually+translated+as&source=bl&ots=AFopF6kmXy&sig=CjPIiAzyMzfuyYNAKZr38crPgjo&hl=en&ei=YUnXS9qmGNKaOO3WyOQG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22szlachta%20is%20habitually%20translated%20as&f=false here] that "/szlachta/ should be translated as 'nobility'"  --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 21:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
2477 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2475 +++$+++ 2476 +++$+++ 2010-04-27 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.272428520E09 +++$+++ Sounds plausible; anyway, I will do nothing unless presented with consensus from a discussion. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Sounds plausible; anyway, I will do nothing unless presented with consensus from a discussion. Regards, [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 21:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

526764 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-28 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.180335960E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 00:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
526765 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526764 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-28 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.180336140E09 +++$+++ Feel free to delete unused image. &mdash;  +++$+++ :: Feel free to delete unused image. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 00:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

264622 +++$+++ CycloneGU +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-25 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.243252860E09 +++$+++ I believe this not only removes the confusion in the article, but also provides improvement in various ways as well.  I still have work to do to put references in the tables, and I am also going to redo the singles tables (those are ugly); I've fixed them already on preceding albums.  I also plan to clean up the references section once the autorefs are in.  Therefore, I've removed the confusion tag for now.  Since you were the placer of the tag, I'd like to know if you think the album requires any further clarification, or what else you think can be done to improve it aside from what I've stated here.  I also welcome any edits you wish to make that can improve the article, too.  Thanks! =)   +++$+++ I believe this not only removes the confusion in the article, but also provides improvement in various ways as well.  I still have work to do to put references in the tables, and I am also going to redo the singles tables (those are ugly); I've fixed them already on preceding albums.  I also plan to clean up the references section once the autorefs are in.  Therefore, I've removed the confusion tag for now.  Since you were the placer of the tag, I'd like to know if you think the album requires any further clarification, or what else you think can be done to improve it aside from what I've stated here.  I also welcome any edits you wish to make that can improve the article, too.  Thanks! =)  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 05:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
264623 +++$+++ CycloneGU +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264622 +++$+++ 264622 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.243325460E09 +++$+++ I saw the edit you made, and it shows me something I missed.  I didn't realize singles were in quotes and not italicized.  I'll pop through the studio albums when finished and correct any that I've italicized.  For now, time to finish my charts on the album and singles.  Thanks for that little tidbit. =)   +++$+++ :I saw the edit you made, and it shows me something I missed.  I didn't realize singles were in quotes and not italicized.  I'll pop through the studio albums when finished and correct any that I've italicized.  For now, time to finish my charts on the album and singles.  Thanks for that little tidbit. =)  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 01:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
264624 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264622 +++$+++ 264623 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.243352340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your work on the article, and for leaving me the above message. I recall what I found confusing was the dual track listings, which need the explanation you've now added. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your work on the article, and for leaving me the above message. I recall what I found confusing was the dual track listings, which need the explanation you've now added. Cheers. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

567470 +++$+++ Alansohn +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.175915940E09 +++$+++ I've worked extensively on New Jersey schools, with a focus on Bergen County, mostly because I think that it's such information that should be on Wikipedia. While I do the work for its own purpose, the recognition is greatly appreciated. let me know if I can help with anything.  +++$+++ I've worked extensively on New Jersey schools, with a focus on Bergen County, mostly because I think that it's such information that should be on Wikipedia. While I do the work for its own purpose, the recognition is greatly appreciated. let me know if I can help with anything. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] 20:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
567471 +++$+++ Alansohn +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567470 +++$+++ 567470 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.176798120E09 +++$+++ My thanks again. Thanks to you for the prodigious work you've done plugging in the holes in Bergen County and the surrounding area. It's amazing how much can be done when we're pursuing this common task.  +++$+++ *My thanks again. Thanks to you for the prodigious work you've done plugging in the holes in Bergen County and the surrounding area. It's amazing how much can be done when we're pursuing this common task. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] 01:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

264625 +++$+++ Richhoncho +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-25 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.243303080E09 +++$+++ OK, so it's not on Wikiproject songs, but it is on other projects. Save you the trouble I have looked at AMG and added the writers. If there are no writers there is no song. Pretty elemental for a song, don't you think? Now it has a an unreferenced tag instead - which I should have put on last time. -- +++$+++ OK, so it's not on Wikiproject songs, but it is on other projects. Save you the trouble I have looked at AMG and added the writers. If there are no writers there is no song. Pretty elemental for a song, don't you think? Now it has a an unreferenced tag instead - which I should have put on last time. --[[User:Richhoncho|Richhoncho]] ([[User talk:Richhoncho|talk]]) 18:58, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
264626 +++$+++ Richhoncho +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264625 +++$+++ 264625 +++$+++ 2009-05-25 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.243314540E09 +++$+++ Yes, I have added the question marks a few times, mostly somebody has come along and entered the songwriter names. Job done. As far as I am concerned the songwriter(s) are a key fact and should always be incorporated as such - even if it is the same as the performer and it becomes doubly important when there are other recordings of the same song and we have a bunch of XXX songs, but no history. Don't feel the same about a lot of the other information from the infoboxes. -- +++$+++ :Yes, I have added the question marks a few times, mostly somebody has come along and entered the songwriter names. Job done. As far as I am concerned the songwriter(s) are a key fact and should always be incorporated as such - even if it is the same as the performer and it becomes doubly important when there are other recordings of the same song and we have a bunch of XXX songs, but no history. Don't feel the same about a lot of the other information from the infoboxes. --[[User:Richhoncho|Richhoncho]] ([[User talk:Richhoncho|talk]]) 22:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

2483 +++$+++ Just plain Bill +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-29 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.291100520E09 +++$+++ In case you hadn't noticed, I'm with you about the \"hardly anyone says 'luthier' when they mean violin maker\" business. I will continue to [[W:AGF|assume good faith]] about that. __  +++$+++ In case you hadn't noticed, I'm with you about the "hardly anyone says 'luthier' when they mean violin maker" business. I will continue to [[W:AGF|assume good faith]] about that. __ [[User:Just plain Bill|Just plain Bill]] ([[User talk:Just plain Bill|talk]]) 23:02, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
2484 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2483 +++$+++ 2483 +++$+++ 2010-11-30 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.291145100E09 +++$+++ Yes, i realised that. I see on your user page that you're a violist from the States like myself, so i guess it's a question of actual knowledge, not just a question of good faith, though perhaps i misunderstood what you're saying here. -- +++$+++ :Yes, i realised that. I see on your user page that you're a violist from the States like myself, so i guess it's a question of actual knowledge, not just a question of good faith, though perhaps i misunderstood what you're saying here. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 11:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
2485 +++$+++ Just plain Bill +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2483 +++$+++ 2484 +++$+++ 2010-11-30 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.291184700E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Competence_is_required#What_.22Competence_is_required.22_does_not_mean|\"Small improvements are our bread and butter.\"]] I will be keeping an eye on that page (as if I could keep myself from watching it ;-)) and hoping that the coolest heads will prevail. Live long and prosper, __  +++$+++ ::[[Wikipedia:Competence_is_required#What_.22Competence_is_required.22_does_not_mean|"Small improvements are our bread and butter."]] I will be keeping an eye on that page (as if I could keep myself from watching it ;-)) and hoping that the coolest heads will prevail. Live long and prosper, __ [[User:Just plain Bill|Just plain Bill]] ([[User talk:Just plain Bill|talk]]) 22:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

2486 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-09 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.299713820E09 +++$+++ Hi, Please read [[WP:RS]] again and there is no need for an edit war on [[Good Friday]]. I added a fact tag to the 2nd item, it has no source at all. And Yahoo.com is not WP:RS, neither is that fellow's personal web site. No need for an edit war here.  +++$+++ Hi, Please read [[WP:RS]] again and there is no need for an edit war on [[Good Friday]]. I added a fact tag to the 2nd item, it has no source at all. And Yahoo.com is not WP:RS, neither is that fellow's personal web site. No need for an edit war here. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 15:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
2487 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2486 +++$+++ 2486 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.299715560E09 +++$+++ Hope you're happy with the explanation in the edit summary showing you had wrong ideas about both sites. One's simply hosting a very reliable source and the other is quoting from very reliable sources. -- +++$+++ :Hope you're happy with the explanation in the edit summary showing you had wrong ideas about both sites. One's simply hosting a very reliable source and the other is quoting from very reliable sources. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 16:06, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
2488 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2486 +++$+++ 2487 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.299716460E09 +++$+++ This is amazing, such a trivial issue, such a useless debate. I will seek a 3O anyway. And please consider this an \"edit war warning\", given that it should really be discussed on the talk page, not reverted.  +++$+++ ::This is amazing, such a trivial issue, such a useless debate. I will seek a 3O anyway. And please consider this an "edit war warning", given that it should really be discussed on the talk page, not reverted. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 16:21, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
2489 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2486 +++$+++ 2488 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.299716940E09 +++$+++ I don't understand. You thought the American Heritage Dictionary quote was a Yahoo creation. I pointed out it's the real thing. Do you agree American Heritage is a reliable source? -- +++$+++ :::I don't understand. You thought the American Heritage Dictionary quote was a Yahoo creation. I pointed out it's the real thing. Do you agree American Heritage is a reliable source? --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 16:29, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
2490 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2486 +++$+++ 2489 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.299718320E09 +++$+++ In printed form, absolutely. On Yahoo, who knows....  +++$+++ ::::In printed form, absolutely. On Yahoo, who knows.... [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 16:52, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
2491 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2486 +++$+++ 2490 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.299718560E09 +++$+++ You can be 100% sure it's the original text because it says \"Provided by Houghton Mifflin\" at the bottom, and the publisher of AH would not let Yahoo change even a comma... -- +++$+++ :::::You can be 100% sure it's the original text because it says "Provided by Houghton Mifflin" at the bottom, and the publisher of AH would not let Yahoo change even a comma... --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 16:56, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
2492 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2486 +++$+++ 2491 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.299719040E09 +++$+++ That is speculation and this discussion is an amazing waste of time. A trivial point now that you added OED.  +++$+++ ::::::That is speculation and this discussion is an amazing waste of time. A trivial point now that you added OED. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 17:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

437321 +++$+++ Zappaz +++$+++ Zappaz +++$+++ 437321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-23 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.111624980E09 +++$+++ ????? I did not tocuh your page, god forbid! Please be careful with your acussations. It is not pleasant...-- +++$+++ ????? I did not tocuh your page, god forbid! Please be careful with your acussations. It is not pleasant...--[[User:Zappaz|Zappaz]] 16:43, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
437322 +++$+++ Willmcw +++$+++ Zappaz +++$+++ 437321 +++$+++ 437321 +++$+++ 2005-03-23 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.111640280E09 +++$+++ I was referring to my comment on the [[Talk:List of purported cults]] page that you deleted in this edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_purported_cults&diff=11423808&oldid=11423120]. - +++$+++ : I was referring to my comment on the [[Talk:List of purported cults]] page that you deleted in this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_purported_cults&diff=11423808&oldid=11423120]. -[[User:Willmcw|Willmcw]] 20:58, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
437323 +++$+++ Zappaz +++$+++ Zappaz +++$+++ 437321 +++$+++ 437322 +++$+++ 2005-03-23 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.111640460E09 +++$+++ If that is the case, then you have to sign your messages. What you wrote there was a lie. -- +++$+++ ::If that is the case, then you have to sign your messages. What you wrote there was a lie. --[[User:Zappaz|Zappaz]] 21:01, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
437324 +++$+++ Willmcw +++$+++ Zappaz +++$+++ 437321 +++$+++ 437323 +++$+++ 2005-03-23 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.111643880E09 +++$+++ I did sign my message in the RfC summary and then you came through and stripped off the signatures. When I added a second comment I tried to follow your lead and didn't add one. Please decide whether you will allow signatures or not.  What did I write that was incorrect? - +++$+++ :::I did sign my message in the RfC summary and then you came through and stripped off the signatures. When I added a second comment I tried to follow your lead and didn't add one. Please decide whether you will allow signatures or not.  What did I write that was incorrect? -[[User:Willmcw|Willmcw]] 21:58, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)

264633 +++$+++ Geotek +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-18 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.247901600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the deletion of 'Plotter Upper Falls.jpg', I had a problem uploading hence the double image, have to leave some time and check it's there next time so it doesn't happen again.  Regards Phil aka  +++$+++ Thanks for the deletion of 'Plotter Upper Falls.jpg', I had a problem uploading hence the double image, have to leave some time and check it's there next time so it doesn't happen again.  Regards Phil aka [[User:Geotek|Geotek]] ([[User talk:Geotek|talk]]) 00:20, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
264634 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264633 +++$+++ 264633 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.247954100E09 +++$+++ Hello. Who owns the copyright to this photo? The copyright holder had to release the photo with a license that is compatible with Wikipedia' free use philosophy. You will see the difference by selecting different licenses form the box on the upload page.<br>Basically, you need to provide as much information as possible. [[:File:Nouvelle image.JPG]] doesn't say who created it, where it came from, what the license is...  +++$+++ :Hello. Who owns the copyright to this photo? The copyright holder had to release the photo with a license that is compatible with Wikipedia' free use philosophy. You will see the difference by selecting different licenses form the box on the upload page.<br>Basically, you need to provide as much information as possible. [[:File:Nouvelle image.JPG]] doesn't say who created it, where it came from, what the license is... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

264635 +++$+++ Midrashah +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-18 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.247956860E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Midrashah|Midrashah]] ([[User talk:Midrashah|talk]]) 15:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
264636 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264635 +++$+++ 264635 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.247957100E09 +++$+++ Do you have any independent third party sources to support its notability?  +++$+++ :Do you have any independent third party sources to support its notability? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

2493 +++$+++ Opus33 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-03 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.304463060E09 +++$+++ Look, book titles are normally capitalized; you'll find this in almost any style manual.  Also, if you read the published books about Sacred Harp, you'll also see that it's standard practice for scholarly work in this area.  Lastly, please discuss an edit this extreme on an appropriate Talk page, to obtain consensus, before launching in on it.  Sincerely,  +++$+++ Look, book titles are normally capitalized; you'll find this in almost any style manual.  Also, if you read the published books about Sacred Harp, you'll also see that it's standard practice for scholarly work in this area.  Lastly, please discuss an edit this extreme on an appropriate Talk page, to obtain consensus, before launching in on it.  Sincerely, [[User:Opus33|Opus33]] ([[User talk:Opus33|talk]]) 15:51, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
2494 +++$+++ Finn Froding +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2493 +++$+++ 2493 +++$+++ 2011-05-03 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.304472360E09 +++$+++ Espoo, I must agree with Opus33 and ask you to stop revising the articles on Sacred Harp singing and Sacred Harp music.  While you may have copyedited numerous articles, I ask you to defer to the consensus of literature on this subject. Sacred Harp singing is singing from the Sacred Harp songbook, a book whose title is ''The Sacred Harp''. The single source you cite for your eccentric style at http:\/\/www.tshaonline.org\/handbook\/online\/articles\/xbsdd is from the Texas State Historical Association, and can hardly stand against the great body of authoritative works on the subject.  +++$+++ :Espoo, I must agree with Opus33 and ask you to stop revising the articles on Sacred Harp singing and Sacred Harp music.  While you may have copyedited numerous articles, I ask you to defer to the consensus of literature on this subject. Sacred Harp singing is singing from the Sacred Harp songbook, a book whose title is ''The Sacred Harp''. The single source you cite for your eccentric style at http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/xbsdd is from the Texas State Historical Association, and can hardly stand against the great body of authoritative works on the subject. [[User:Finn Froding|Finn Froding]] ([[User talk:Finn Froding|talk]]) 18:26, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
2495 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2493 +++$+++ 2494 +++$+++ 2011-05-03 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.304480400E09 +++$+++ According to http:\/\/fasola.org\/ the article name should be changed to [[shape note singing]] or merged with [[shape note]]: ''Technically, our style of singing is \u201cshape note singing\u201d because the musical notation uses note heads in 4 distinct shapes to aid in sight-reading, but it is often called \u201cSacred Harp\u201d singing because the books that most singers use today are called \u201cThe Sacred Harp,\u201d with the most prominent of these being the 1991 Denson edition.''  -- +++$+++ ::According to http://fasola.org/ the article name should be changed to [[shape note singing]] or merged with [[shape note]]: ''Technically, our style of singing is “shape note singing” because the musical notation uses note heads in 4 distinct shapes to aid in sight-reading, but it is often called “Sacred Harp” singing because the books that most singers use today are called “The Sacred Harp,” with the most prominent of these being the 1991 Denson edition.''  --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 20:40, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
2496 +++$+++ Finn Froding +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2493 +++$+++ 2495 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.304495460E09 +++$+++ What fasola.org says is \"The best way to learn about Sacred Harp singing [sic] is to sing it yourself by attending annual or local singings.\"  Note the capitalisation. I understand and agree with WP:MOS on the principle of restraint in the use of the upper case.  I ask you to understand the conventions within this field and acknowledge that procrustean applications of general rules may not be appropriate in all cases, and that those who have been editing these pages have been following the best practices of scholarship in this area.  +++$+++ :::What fasola.org says is "The best way to learn about Sacred Harp singing [sic] is to sing it yourself by attending annual or local singings."  Note the capitalisation. I understand and agree with WP:MOS on the principle of restraint in the use of the upper case.  I ask you to understand the conventions within this field and acknowledge that procrustean applications of general rules may not be appropriate in all cases, and that those who have been editing these pages have been following the best practices of scholarship in this area. [[User:Finn Froding|Finn Froding]] ([[User talk:Finn Froding|talk]]) 00:51, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
2497 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2493 +++$+++ 2496 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.304508720E09 +++$+++ In addition, we should consider moving it to [[shape-note singing]] or [[fasola singing]] because these are called synonyms by the New Georgia Encyclopedia and because they are less confusing and misleading than \"Sacred Harp singing\". You have to remember that this topic is linked to from other articles, and their readers would get a wrong idea and would be confused by [[Sacred Harp singing]] unless they click on the link and read the lede, which most will not do. But \"Sacred Harp singing\" is definitely a much better title than what we have now. -- +++$+++ ::::In addition, we should consider moving it to [[shape-note singing]] or [[fasola singing]] because these are called synonyms by the New Georgia Encyclopedia and because they are less confusing and misleading than "Sacred Harp singing". You have to remember that this topic is linked to from other articles, and their readers would get a wrong idea and would be confused by [[Sacred Harp singing]] unless they click on the link and read the lede, which most will not do. But "Sacred Harp singing" is definitely a much better title than what we have now. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 04:32, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
2498 +++$+++ Opus33 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2493 +++$+++ 2497 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.304513160E09 +++$+++ Hello Espoo.  I think you are somewhat confused.  Web sites are virtually ''never'' the \"best sources\" when there exists a scholarly literature, peer reviewed and published by academic presses.  The works of Jackson, Cobb, Beale, and Steel, cited above by Finn Froding, are references of this type and should serve as the primary source for Sacred Harp editing, including the question of what to name the field and how to capitalize it.  I have read these books from cover to cover, and I would not be surprised if Finn Froding has as well.  Have you?  If not, I suggest you come back with your suggestions after you have done so.  The same goes for any topic on the Wikipedia -- editing should come ''after'' reading and study.  For more on this question, please consult [[WP:VER]].  Sincerely,  +++$+++ :::::Hello Espoo.  I think you are somewhat confused.  Web sites are virtually ''never'' the "best sources" when there exists a scholarly literature, peer reviewed and published by academic presses.  The works of Jackson, Cobb, Beale, and Steel, cited above by Finn Froding, are references of this type and should serve as the primary source for Sacred Harp editing, including the question of what to name the field and how to capitalize it.  I have read these books from cover to cover, and I would not be surprised if Finn Froding has as well.  Have you?  If not, I suggest you come back with your suggestions after you have done so.  The same goes for any topic on the Wikipedia -- editing should come ''after'' reading and study.  For more on this question, please consult [[WP:VER]].  Sincerely, [[User:Opus33|Opus33]] ([[User talk:Opus33|talk]]) 05:46, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

264639 +++$+++ Midrashah +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-18 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.247964000E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Midrashah|Midrashah]] ([[User talk:Midrashah|talk]]) 17:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
264640 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264639 +++$+++ 264639 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.247964180E09 +++$+++ You might get away with it if you used that reference. Please remember to include references to independent sources in your articles to avoid further speedy deletions.  +++$+++ :You might get away with it if you used that reference. Please remember to include references to independent sources in your articles to avoid further speedy deletions. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

264641 +++$+++ Midrashah +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264641 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-18 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.247964600E09 +++$+++ Thanx. can I put it back now? -- +++$+++ Thanx. can I put it back now? --[[User:Midrashah|Midrashah]] ([[User talk:Midrashah|talk]]) 17:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
264642 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264641 +++$+++ 264641 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.247964780E09 +++$+++ I have restored it on condition that you add third-party sources. If these are not added within 24 hours I will delete it again.  +++$+++ :I have restored it on condition that you add third-party sources. If these are not added within 24 hours I will delete it again. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

526786 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-28 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.183082400E09 +++$+++ How about a Portal dedicated to the early \"Marines\", Revolutionary War era? Do we have info on the battles that they participated? Images of uniforms used during that era? Marines who distinguished themselves? What do you think?  +++$+++ How about a Portal dedicated to the early "Marines", Revolutionary War era? Do we have info on the battles that they participated? Images of uniforms used during that era? Marines who distinguished themselves? What do you think? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 19:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
526787 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526786 +++$+++ 526786 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.183105800E09 +++$+++ You bet, after the project, we'll work on an article about the early history of the Corps.  +++$+++ *You bet, after the project, we'll work on an article about the early history of the Corps. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

2499 +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-04 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.304531040E09 +++$+++ Looks like you've caught the disease described at [[WP:OWNERSHIP]], which will also help clear up your confusion about what WP is. -- +++$+++ Looks like you've caught the disease described at [[WP:OWNERSHIP]], which will also help clear up your confusion about what WP is. --[[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo#top|talk]]) 10:44, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
2500 +++$+++ Finn Froding +++$+++ Espoo +++$+++ 2499 +++$+++ 2499 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.304547540E09 +++$+++ I don't think we need an argument about who is confused or who \"owns\" the article. I do think we need to take this discussion to [[Talk:Sacred Harp]], where the contributors can express their views. I think we've demonstrated that capitalisation is no longer the issue. I've expressed a willingness to consider renaming the article to \"Sacred Harp singing\"--this accords with the scholarly literature, and it happens to be the first three words of the existing article. There may be a downside to this that I haven't considered.  But I'd like to hear from others. I intend to raise the issue on the Talk page, with a xref to the present discussion.  +++$+++ :I don't think we need an argument about who is confused or who "owns" the article. I do think we need to take this discussion to [[Talk:Sacred Harp]], where the contributors can express their views. I think we've demonstrated that capitalisation is no longer the issue. I've expressed a willingness to consider renaming the article to "Sacred Harp singing"--this accords with the scholarly literature, and it happens to be the first three words of the existing article. There may be a downside to this that I haven't considered.  But I'd like to hear from others. I intend to raise the issue on the Talk page, with a xref to the present discussion. [[User:Finn Froding|Finn Froding]] ([[User talk:Finn Froding|talk]]) 15:19, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

264644 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264644 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-20 08:09:00 +++$+++ 1.248102540E09 +++$+++ I am considering going live with [[User:MichaelQSchmidt\/sandbox\/National Fibromyalgia Association]]. I'm feeling pretty good about 10 hours of work. Please take a look and advise of any concerns. Thank you,  +++$+++ I am considering going live with [[User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox/National Fibromyalgia Association]]. I'm feeling pretty good about 10 hours of work. Please take a look and advise of any concerns. Thank you, [[User:MichaelQSchmidt|MichaelQSchmidt]] ([[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|talk]]) 08:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
264645 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264644 +++$+++ 264644 +++$+++ 2009-07-20 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.248113280E09 +++$+++ The combining of sections gives the article a much sleeker look. Thank you very much. In the morning... after I take it live... I will look into that AfD. Much appreciated.  +++$+++ :The combining of sections gives the article a much sleeker look. Thank you very much. In the morning... after I take it live... I will look into that AfD. Much appreciated. [[User:MichaelQSchmidt|MichaelQSchmidt]] ([[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|talk]]) 11:08, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
264646 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264644 +++$+++ 264644 +++$+++ 2009-07-20 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.248122520E09 +++$+++ This gives me a lot of confidence that the ''Waterloo Road'' articles will transcend the scrapheap that they currently are festering upon.  +++$+++ :This gives me a lot of confidence that the ''Waterloo Road'' articles will transcend the scrapheap that they currently are festering upon. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:42, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

2502 +++$+++ JRawle +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-11 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.292100120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for putting all these back in their rightful place. Regards, ''' +++$+++ Thanks for putting all these back in their rightful place. Regards, '''[[User:JRawle|<font color="blue">J</font><font color="navy">Rawle</font>]]''' ([[User talk:JRawle|Talk]]) 12:42, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
2503 +++$+++ JRawle +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2502 +++$+++ 2502 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.292102100E09 +++$+++ Thanks also for reverting all the ridiculous edits by [[User:Somewhatdazed]]! ''' +++$+++ :Thanks also for reverting all the ridiculous edits by [[User:Somewhatdazed]]! '''[[User:JRawle|<font color="blue">J</font><font color="navy">Rawle</font>]]''' ([[User talk:JRawle|Talk]]) 13:15, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
2504 +++$+++ Kittybrewster +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2502 +++$+++ 2503 +++$+++ 2010-12-28 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.293604980E09 +++$+++ [[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl#Problem_with_User:Lucy-marie]].  +++$+++ ::[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl#Problem_with_User:Lucy-marie]]. [[User:Kittybrewster|Kittybrewster ]] [[User_talk:Kittybrewster|<font color="0000FF">&#9742;</font>]] 22:43, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
2505 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2502 +++$+++ 2503 +++$+++ 2010-12-29 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.293653040E09 +++$+++ Moved by Lucy-marie to [[User talk:BrownHairedGirl#Naming convention and peerages]].   +++$+++ ::Moved by Lucy-marie to [[User talk:BrownHairedGirl#Naming convention and peerages]].  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 12:04, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

264647 +++$+++ 92.21.58.113 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-21 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.248239460E09 +++$+++ I would harldy consider what i said to have been a personal attack. For one i didn't even know the person \"personally\". Do you by any chance go looking for trouble? Because it seems to me you do. [[Special:Contributions\/92.21.58.113|92.21.58.113]] ( +++$+++ I would harldy consider what i said to have been a personal attack. For one i didn't even know the person "personally". Do you by any chance go looking for trouble? Because it seems to me you do. [[Special:Contributions/92.21.58.113|92.21.58.113]] ([[User talk:92.21.58.113|talk]]) 22:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
264648 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264647 +++$+++ 264647 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.248239640E09 +++$+++ I just thought that you gently need to be encouraged to watch the way you talk about other contributors. I agree that on this occasion it was mild; on the other hand, how do you think whoever it was you were referring to might feel about it? Please stop being personal.  +++$+++ :I just thought that you gently need to be encouraged to watch the way you talk about other contributors. I agree that on this occasion it was mild; on the other hand, how do you think whoever it was you were referring to might feel about it? Please stop being personal. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
264649 +++$+++ 92.21.58.113 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264647 +++$+++ 264648 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.248239940E09 +++$+++ Its not my problem to worry how they feel. But im sure they wouldn't have overreacted like you do. So give it a rest. If your going to nit pick at a user at least make it worthy. [[Special:Contributions\/92.21.58.113|92.21.58.113]] ( +++$+++ ::Its not my problem to worry how they feel. But im sure they wouldn't have overreacted like you do. So give it a rest. If your going to nit pick at a user at least make it worthy. [[Special:Contributions/92.21.58.113|92.21.58.113]] ([[User talk:92.21.58.113|talk]]) 22:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
264650 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264647 +++$+++ 264649 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.248240120E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid that in a mature environment it is your obligation to care about how your colleagues feel.  +++$+++ :::I'm afraid that in a mature environment it is your obligation to care about how your colleagues feel. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
264651 +++$+++ 92.23.188.163 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264647 +++$+++ 264650 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.248379920E09 +++$+++ \"Colleagues\" - im not at work. Seriously, grow a pair. And lets be frank, its not as if you give a toss about your \"collegues\". All you do is deleate, deleate, deleate, deleate, deleate and yeah more deleates! Hypocrite [[Special:Contributions\/92.23.188.163|92.23.188.163]] ( +++$+++ :::: "Colleagues" - im not at work. Seriously, grow a pair. And lets be frank, its not as if you give a toss about your "collegues". All you do is deleate, deleate, deleate, deleate, deleate and yeah more deleates! Hypocrite [[Special:Contributions/92.23.188.163|92.23.188.163]] ([[User talk:92.23.188.163|talk]]) 13:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
264652 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264647 +++$+++ 264651 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.248380100E09 +++$+++ Nah, but I do sometimes ''delete''.  +++$+++ :::::Nah, but I do sometimes ''delete''. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:15, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
264653 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264647 +++$+++ 264647 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 08:44:00 +++$+++ 1.248363840E09 +++$+++ If you think the changes are positive, then just leave it. Wikipedia articles are usually assumed to be incomplete anyway -- it might encourage someone else with the information to complete the others? It's repeated quite often on Challenge TV...  +++$+++ :If you think the changes are positive, then just leave it. Wikipedia articles are usually assumed to be incomplete anyway -- it might encourage someone else with the information to complete the others? It's repeated quite often on Challenge TV... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

526792 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-08 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.183888680E09 +++$+++ Since you took care of somethings in the [[George E. Mayer]] article, could you do the same for [[Pedro N. Rivera]]?  +++$+++ Since you took care of somethings in the [[George E. Mayer]] article, could you do the same for [[Pedro N. Rivera]]? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
526793 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526792 +++$+++ 526792 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.183894200E09 +++$+++ Houston we have a problem. Unable to open uploaded file. Try something else. If not we can resort to having sections \"Servicewomen\", Discrimination\", Hero Street\", \"Homefront\" and \"Conclussion\" either within an e-mail or in workshop.  +++$+++ *Houston we have a problem. Unable to open uploaded file. Try something else. If not we can resort to having sections "Servicewomen", Discrimination", Hero Street", "Homefront" and "Conclussion" either within an e-mail or in workshop. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

568396 +++$+++ Wright123 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568396 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-04 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.149470160E09 +++$+++ Thank you for taking the time to reconsider you action.  +++$+++ Thank you for taking the time to reconsider you action. [[User:Wright123|Wright123]] 18:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
568397 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568396 +++$+++ 568396 +++$+++ 2006-06-04 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.149473340E09 +++$+++ Just because a subject fails the criteria for notability now, it doesn't mean that this subject is banned for all time.  Perhaps next month the album will go gold and the month after this chap will start a national or international tour, thus becoming notable. I don't delete out of spite, my actions as an administrator are governed by policy and guidelines-as-written. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :Just because a subject fails the criteria for notability now, it doesn't mean that this subject is banned for all time.  Perhaps next month the album will go gold and the month after this chap will start a national or international tour, thus becoming notable. I don't delete out of spite, my actions as an administrator are governed by policy and guidelines-as-written. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 19:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

2508 +++$+++ Kittybrewster +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2508 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-07 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.297116960E09 +++$+++ Please could you create this article.  +++$+++ Please could you create this article. [[User:Kittybrewster|Kittybrewster ]] [[User_talk:Kittybrewster|<font color="0000FF">&#9742;</font>]] 14:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
2509 +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2508 +++$+++ 2508 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.297138260E09 +++$+++ Done!  +++$+++ :Done! [[User:Tryde|Tryde]] ([[User talk:Tryde#top|talk]]) 20:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
2510 +++$+++ Kittybrewster +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2508 +++$+++ 2509 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.297203840E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Please could you add '''[[Des Voeux Baronets]] of Indiaville, Queen's Co.'''.  +++$+++ ::Thank you. Please could you add '''[[Des Voeux Baronets]] of Indiaville, Queen's Co.'''. [[User:Kittybrewster|Kittybrewster ]] [[User_talk:Kittybrewster|<font color="0000FF">&#9742;</font>]] 14:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
2511 +++$+++ Kittybrewster +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2508 +++$+++ 2510 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.297280880E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ :::Thank you. [[User:Kittybrewster|Kittybrewster ]] [[User_talk:Kittybrewster|<font color="0000FF">&#9742;</font>]] 11:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

526797 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-13 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.184324940E09 +++$+++ By the way, do you happen to know where I can go to to check out the wikitables?    +++$+++ By the way, do you happen to know where I can go to to check out the wikitables?   [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
526798 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526797 +++$+++ 526797 +++$+++ 2007-07-14 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.184410680E09 +++$+++ It's O.K., I took care of it. I found exactly what I was looking for in the [[Medal of Honor]] article.  +++$+++ *It's O.K., I took care of it. I found exactly what I was looking for in the [[Medal of Honor]] article. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

264654 +++$+++ Ks0stm +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264654 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-23 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.248376980E09 +++$+++ That redirect thingy you deleted...I think i messed up when trying to move it assuming it belonged as a user subpage, but I'm not exactly sure how to fix it....help, please? (I (mistakenly?) moved it to  +++$+++ That redirect thingy you deleted...I think i messed up when trying to move it assuming it belonged as a user subpage, but I'm not exactly sure how to fix it....help, please? (I (mistakenly?) moved it to [[User:Sean.p.abell/sandbox]]) [[w:User:Ks0stm|<font color="009900" ><b>Ks0stm</b></font>]]  <sup>([[User talk:Ks0stm|<font color="blue" face="Arial"><b>T</b></font>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Ks0stm|<font color="blue" face="Arial"><b>C</b></font>]])</sup> 12:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
264655 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264654 +++$+++ 264654 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.248377100E09 +++$+++ Is there any content that needs rescuing? The only edit I seem to have deleted was the redirect?  +++$+++ :Is there any content that needs rescuing? The only edit I seem to have deleted was the redirect? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
264656 +++$+++ Ks0stm +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264654 +++$+++ 264655 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.248377340E09 +++$+++ I'm honestly not sure...I can't tell if it ended up where it was supposed to be or not. Did it end up a subpage of the user page, or was it supposed to end up somewhere else? It's the first time I've moved a page, so I'm not really sure if it was right.  [[w:User:Ks0stm|<font color=\"009900\" ><b>Ks0stm<\/b><\/font>]]  <sup>( +++$+++ ::I'm honestly not sure...I can't tell if it ended up where it was supposed to be or not. Did it end up a subpage of the user page, or was it supposed to end up somewhere else? It's the first time I've moved a page, so I'm not really sure if it was right.  [[w:User:Ks0stm|<font color="009900" ><b>Ks0stm</b></font>]]  <sup>([[User talk:Ks0stm|<font color="blue" face="Arial"><b>T</b></font>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Ks0stm|<font color="blue" face="Arial"><b>C</b></font>]])</sup> 12:29, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
264657 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264654 +++$+++ 264656 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.248377460E09 +++$+++ [[User:Sean.p.abell\/sandbox]] just seems to be a series of subheadings. Is that what you mean? If you were trying to move that there, then it looks OK.  +++$+++ :::[[User:Sean.p.abell/sandbox]] just seems to be a series of subheadings. Is that what you mean? If you were trying to move that there, then it looks OK. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
264658 +++$+++ Ks0stm +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264654 +++$+++ 264657 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.248377700E09 +++$+++ Looking at it, I think it looks fine...thanks! [[w:User:Ks0stm|<font color=\"009900\" ><b>Ks0stm<\/b><\/font>]]  <sup>( +++$+++ ::::Looking at it, I think it looks fine...thanks! [[w:User:Ks0stm|<font color="009900" ><b>Ks0stm</b></font>]]  <sup>([[User talk:Ks0stm|<font color="blue" face="Arial"><b>T</b></font>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Ks0stm|<font color="blue" face="Arial"><b>C</b></font>]])</sup> 12:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

526799 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526799 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-15 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.184494800E09 +++$+++ See your email and the anon's talk page. He did it. +++$+++ See your email and the anon's talk page. He did it.[[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 03:20, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
526800 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526799 +++$+++ 526799 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.184521500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the assistance. Odd indeed. +++$+++ :Thanks for the assistance. Odd indeed.[[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 10:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

526801 +++$+++ Afcyrus +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-18 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.184761080E09 +++$+++ Did you read the part of my post that stated that according to [[WP:NPF]] (People who are relatively unknown) Wikipedia also contains biographies of people who, while notable enough for an entry, are not generally well known.  Sir, I respect your position in the community.  As such, I realize that perhaps edits (particularly of awards) should be made.  However, please feel free to browse through the bios section for Airmen in the USAF.  There are plenty.  I do, therefore, believe that my service in the world's greatest Air Force and the resulting contributions to the digital forensics community make me, while not \"generally well known\" at least \"notable enough for entry\" (referring back to [[WP:NPF]]).  Keep in mind that the target audience is the digital forensic community.  Do you think that the listed publications do not warrant notability at least in that field.  I sincerely request that you re-edit your post to state to '''keep with the action of editing awards and decorations'''.  Also, just a heads up, you forgot to do the four tilde to sign the post.  Thank you for your time and interest. +++$+++ Did you read the part of my post that stated that according to [[WP:NPF]] (People who are relatively unknown) Wikipedia also contains biographies of people who, while notable enough for an entry, are not generally well known.  Sir, I respect your position in the community.  As such, I realize that perhaps edits (particularly of awards) should be made.  However, please feel free to browse through the bios section for Airmen in the USAF.  There are plenty.  I do, therefore, believe that my service in the world's greatest Air Force and the resulting contributions to the digital forensics community make me, while not "generally well known" at least "notable enough for entry" (referring back to [[WP:NPF]]).  Keep in mind that the target audience is the digital forensic community.  Do you think that the listed publications do not warrant notability at least in that field.  I sincerely request that you re-edit your post to state to '''keep with the action of editing awards and decorations'''.  Also, just a heads up, you forgot to do the four tilde to sign the post.  Thank you for your time and interest.[[User:Afcyrus|Afcyrus]] 05:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
526802 +++$+++ Afcyrus +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526801 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.184762100E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Phyllis_McCarthy  Phyllis McCarthy is a dogbreeder] who is included. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Norm_Augustinus Norm Augustinus is a podcaster] who is included. How about this one? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Carl_Freer Carl Free is a Swedish businessman].  Have you read through the bios?  There are countless bios shorter and seemingly less significant than mine who are accepted (and rightfully so).  The purpose of wikipedia is to share information.  I want for my publications to be sought and known about by the digital forensic community for THEIR BENEFIT.  I just so happened to post an originally poorly written bio at the same time that some people were trolling recent posts with a javascript program called Twinkle.  That's the only reason my article is even questioned.  While I may not warrant notability because of my military service specifically, I feel that my contributions to digital forensics is definitely notable (as do other people). I am even willing to remove the military infobox if you think that would be a fair article, but my contribs to digital forensics are notable, and I honestly don't understand how you don't see that.  Please reconsider, sir. +++$+++ :*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phyllis_McCarthy  Phyllis McCarthy is a dogbreeder] who is included. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_Augustinus Norm Augustinus is a podcaster] who is included. How about this one? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Freer Carl Free is a Swedish businessman].  Have you read through the bios?  There are countless bios shorter and seemingly less significant than mine who are accepted (and rightfully so).  The purpose of wikipedia is to share information.  I want for my publications to be sought and known about by the digital forensic community for THEIR BENEFIT.  I just so happened to post an originally poorly written bio at the same time that some people were trolling recent posts with a javascript program called Twinkle.  That's the only reason my article is even questioned.  While I may not warrant notability because of my military service specifically, I feel that my contributions to digital forensics is definitely notable (as do other people). I am even willing to remove the military infobox if you think that would be a fair article, but my contribs to digital forensics are notable, and I honestly don't understand how you don't see that.  Please reconsider, sir.[[User:Afcyrus|Afcyrus]] 05:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
526803 +++$+++ Afcyrus +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526801 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.184882580E09 +++$+++ How is it fair that people allow Charlene to post AGAINST the policy for deletion review?!  This is not the place for debate.  The debate page was closed long before there was ample time to debate the deletion of the article.  \"Remember that Deletion Review is not an opportunity to (re-)express your opinion on the content in question. It is an opportunity to correct errors in process (in the absence of significant new information), and thus the action specified should be the editor's feeling of the correct interpretation of the debate.\" (Per [[WP:DRV]]).  +++$+++ ::*How is it fair that people allow Charlene to post AGAINST the policy for deletion review?!  This is not the place for debate.  The debate page was closed long before there was ample time to debate the deletion of the article.  "Remember that Deletion Review is not an opportunity to (re-)express your opinion on the content in question. It is an opportunity to correct errors in process (in the absence of significant new information), and thus the action specified should be the editor's feeling of the correct interpretation of the debate." (Per [[WP:DRV]]). [[User:Afcyrus|Afcyrus]] 15:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

2514 +++$+++ Opera hat +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2514 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-15 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.300175400E09 +++$+++ I notice you've added the style \"The Hon.\" to several office-holders in the UK Government articles. I think it's inconsistent to add this without adding the higher style \"The Rt Hon.\" to those who held it, and by extension \"The Most Hon.\" and \"His Grace\" to those so styled. These would be inappropriate in such a list, and so is \"The Hon.\"  +++$+++ I notice you've added the style "The Hon." to several office-holders in the UK Government articles. I think it's inconsistent to add this without adding the higher style "The Rt Hon." to those who held it, and by extension "The Most Hon." and "His Grace" to those so styled. These would be inappropriate in such a list, and so is "The Hon." [[User:Opera hat|Opera hat]] ([[User talk:Opera hat|talk]]) 00:50, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
2515 +++$+++ Kittybrewster +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2514 +++$+++ 2514 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.301852340E09 +++$+++ I can find no evidence of Scott Michael Boyle. What is your source, Generalwar?  +++$+++ :I can find no evidence of Scott Michael Boyle. What is your source, Generalwar? [[User:Kittybrewster|Kittybrewster ]] [[User_talk:Kittybrewster|<font color="0000FF">&#9742;</font>]] 10:39, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

264659 +++$+++ Smurfmeister +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-23 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.248381840E09 +++$+++ I have trimmed down on detail as requested, leaving in what I felt were essential additions (who died in the fire the section of the article describes etc.). However, I am a little disappointed that you requested my help in tweaking the page, but then, just 27 minutes later, simply reverted the edit because I hadn't replied immediately. As much as I like Wikipedia, I have a full-time job to deal with too :0)  +++$+++ I have trimmed down on detail as requested, leaving in what I felt were essential additions (who died in the fire the section of the article describes etc.). However, I am a little disappointed that you requested my help in tweaking the page, but then, just 27 minutes later, simply reverted the edit because I hadn't replied immediately. As much as I like Wikipedia, I have a full-time job to deal with too :0) [[User:Smurfmeister|Smurfmeister]] ([[User talk:Smurfmeister|talk]]) 13:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
264660 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264659 +++$+++ 264659 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.248384300E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry you were offended by my [[WP:BOLD|bold edit]]. It just so happened that everything in that particular edit seemed superfluous, and it was quicker to do it myself...   +++$+++ :I'm sorry you were offended by my [[WP:BOLD|bold edit]]. It just so happened that everything in that particular edit seemed superfluous, and it was quicker to do it myself...  [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
264661 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264659 +++$+++ 264659 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.248572640E09 +++$+++ I'm not trying to remove everything ''WR''. I just want to remove the silly ones without references, real-world context, written  by 9-year olds, etc. If there was any sign of any effort of them being brought up to standard I wouldn't have any complaints. Even the parent article is an embarrassment. Where is the development and production section, for instance?  +++$+++ :I'm not trying to remove everything ''WR''. I just want to remove the silly ones without references, real-world context, written  by 9-year olds, etc. If there was any sign of any effort of them being brought up to standard I wouldn't have any complaints. Even the parent article is an embarrassment. Where is the development and production section, for instance? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
264662 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264659 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.248587880E09 +++$+++ I have enough to do! The character articles will probably never be adequate -- there is simply not enough said about them in independent sources. [[Pauline Fowler]] is an excellent example of an article about a fictional character in a BBC soap. Notice how it's not simply a retelling of the plot -- it has some real-world context attributed to reliable sources. Do you think you can develop the character articles anywhere near that?  +++$+++ :::I have enough to do! The character articles will probably never be adequate -- there is simply not enough said about them in independent sources. [[Pauline Fowler]] is an excellent example of an article about a fictional character in a BBC soap. Notice how it's not simply a retelling of the plot -- it has some real-world context attributed to reliable sources. Do you think you can develop the character articles anywhere near that? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:58, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
264663 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264659 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-26 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.248658140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your mature response, as per usual. So where are the four years of coverage in reliable sources? Where are the four years worth of coverage? Are you saying that you cannot even ''begin'' to bring the ''WR'' character articles to standard? Have the heads in ''WR'' been discussed my educational unions, academics, etc? Has the representation of the English comprehensive system been discussed? (I'm sure it has -- why isn't it discussed in detail?)<br>Please see this discourse beyond an argument -- I have made some useful suggestions. I would have more pateince with these articles if people edited them properly.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for your mature response, as per usual. So where are the four years of coverage in reliable sources? Where are the four years worth of coverage? Are you saying that you cannot even ''begin'' to bring the ''WR'' character articles to standard? Have the heads in ''WR'' been discussed my educational unions, academics, etc? Has the representation of the English comprehensive system been discussed? (I'm sure it has -- why isn't it discussed in detail?)<br>Please see this discourse beyond an argument -- I have made some useful suggestions. I would have more pateince with these articles if people edited them properly. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
264664 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264659 +++$+++ 264659 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.248720480E09 +++$+++ Copyright violation.  +++$+++ :Copyright violation. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
264665 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264659 +++$+++ 264659 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.248722460E09 +++$+++ There was very little for me to restore. If you have completed the article feel free to post it, and I will assess its appropriateness.  +++$+++ :There was very little for me to restore. If you have completed the article feel free to post it, and I will assess its appropriateness. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:21, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

2517 +++$+++ Tenmei +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-09 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.304926140E09 +++$+++ At [[Marquess of Cholmondeley]], your edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Marquess_of_Cholmondeley&diff=428082600&oldid=416803831  here] leaves me puzzled. Perhaps your rationale is best understood in the broader context of similar articles about British [[marquess]]es? -- +++$+++ At [[Marquess of Cholmondeley]], your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marquess_of_Cholmondeley&diff=428082600&oldid=416803831  here] leaves me puzzled. Perhaps your rationale is best understood in the broader context of similar articles about British [[marquess]]es? --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 00:29, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
2518 +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2517 +++$+++ 2517 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.304968200E09 +++$+++ It has been customary to include non-succeeding heirs in lists of peers. However, I don't think there is an official policy on this. I will bring it up at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage]].  +++$+++ :It has been customary to include non-succeeding heirs in lists of peers. However, I don't think there is an official policy on this. I will bring it up at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage]]. [[User:Tryde|Tryde]] ([[User talk:Tryde#top|talk]]) 12:10, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
2519 +++$+++ Tenmei +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2517 +++$+++ 2518 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.304982060E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your follow-up.<p>In general, I have no direct interest in the array of articles about the British peerage; however, my close attention to the development of the Cholmondeley articles seems justified by the kind of nuanced perspective your edit has highlighted.<p>Please consider a hypothesis that articles about the [[Marquess of Cholmondeley|Marquesses of Cholmondeley]] and [[Baron Delamere|Barons Delamere]] may offer perspective for evaluating ways to improve articles about Japanese counterparts, e.g., the [[Meiji period]] ''[[kazoku]]'' peerage system, the pre-Maiji ''[[daimyo]]'' system, etc.<p>At first blush, I wonder if a non-succeeding Viscount Malpas would be better presented as an inline note attached to his father?  IMO, the emphasis in transition can be perhaps better handled by a note attached to his father's successor?  For example, please give some thought to the \"Notes\" columns in  the tables of the four ''sesh\u016b [[shinn\u014dke]]'' &mdash; [[Fushimi-no-miya]], [[Katsura-no-miya]], [[Arisugawa-no-miya]], [[Kan'in-no-miya]]?<p>I wonder if adding Viscount Malpas in the list might contrive a kind of misplaced emphasis within the narrowly-focused context of this specific article?  In other words, the overall objectives of the article is better served by attention to serial successors rather than non-succeeding presumptive heirs? -- +++$+++ ::Thank you for your follow-up.<p>In general, I have no direct interest in the array of articles about the British peerage; however, my close attention to the development of the Cholmondeley articles seems justified by the kind of nuanced perspective your edit has highlighted.<p>Please consider a hypothesis that articles about the [[Marquess of Cholmondeley|Marquesses of Cholmondeley]] and [[Baron Delamere|Barons Delamere]] may offer perspective for evaluating ways to improve articles about Japanese counterparts, e.g., the [[Meiji period]] ''[[kazoku]]'' peerage system, the pre-Maiji ''[[daimyo]]'' system, etc.<p>At first blush, I wonder if a non-succeeding Viscount Malpas would be better presented as an inline note attached to his father?  IMO, the emphasis in transition can be perhaps better handled by a note attached to his father's successor?  For example, please give some thought to the "Notes" columns in  the tables of the four ''seshū [[shinnōke]]'' &mdash; [[Fushimi-no-miya]], [[Katsura-no-miya]], [[Arisugawa-no-miya]], [[Kan'in-no-miya]]?<p>I wonder if adding Viscount Malpas in the list might contrive a kind of misplaced emphasis within the narrowly-focused context of this specific article?  In other words, the overall objectives of the article is better served by attention to serial successors rather than non-succeeding presumptive heirs? --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 16:01, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
2520 +++$+++ Tenmei +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2517 +++$+++ 2519 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.305068940E09 +++$+++ Please give some thought to my edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Marquess_of_Cholmondeley&diff=428436231&oldid=428435685  here]. -- +++$+++ :::Please give some thought to my edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marquess_of_Cholmondeley&diff=428436231&oldid=428435685  here]. --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 16:09, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

2521 +++$+++ Kittybrewster +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-09 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.304959020E09 +++$+++ this redirects to 9th Earl which is wrong.  +++$+++ this redirects to 9th Earl which is wrong. [[User:Kittybrewster|Kittybrewster ]] [[User_talk:Kittybrewster|<font color="0000FF">&#9742;</font>]] 09:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
2522 +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2521 +++$+++ 2521 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.305076440E09 +++$+++ It is customary to include [[territorial designation]]s in peerage articles. You removed the territorial decoration from this article without any explanation. The td in this case is \"of Templemore in the County of Donegal\". This place may now be mainly in County Londonderry, but that is neither here nor there, the territorial designation doesn't change. I also think the emphasis in an article on a peerage should be on the recipient and what he or she did to receive the title - the emphasis should not be on geographical issues relating to the title. The information on Templemore is very useful and should be included but should not be the focus of the article. It is normal for this kind on information to be located at the bottom of the article. It is also customary to include the descent of the title - you removed this material without any explanation. Please clarify what you find confusing.  +++$+++ :It is customary to include [[territorial designation]]s in peerage articles. You removed the territorial decoration from this article without any explanation. The td in this case is "of Templemore in the County of Donegal". This place may now be mainly in County Londonderry, but that is neither here nor there, the territorial designation doesn't change. I also think the emphasis in an article on a peerage should be on the recipient and what he or she did to receive the title - the emphasis should not be on geographical issues relating to the title. The information on Templemore is very useful and should be included but should not be the focus of the article. It is normal for this kind on information to be located at the bottom of the article. It is also customary to include the descent of the title - you removed this material without any explanation. Please clarify what you find confusing. [[User:Tryde|Tryde]] ([[User talk:Tryde#top|talk]]) 18:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
2523 +++$+++ Laurel Lodged +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2521 +++$+++ 2522 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.305080760E09 +++$+++ The reader will be presented with contradictory information unless the differences between the td of Donegal is explained versus the parish of Derry. A note, at least, is needed. \"The first, second and third barons served as [[Deputy Lieutenant]]s of [[County Wexford]].\" is more compact that the constant repetition in the current format. There is no loss of information in my version. Also, where does Wexford come from? There is no context for a town at the opposite end of the country.  +++$+++ ::The reader will be presented with contradictory information unless the differences between the td of Donegal is explained versus the parish of Derry. A note, at least, is needed. "The first, second and third barons served as [[Deputy Lieutenant]]s of [[County Wexford]]." is more compact that the constant repetition in the current format. There is no loss of information in my version. Also, where does Wexford come from? There is no context for a town at the opposite end of the country. [[User:Laurel Lodged|Laurel Lodged]] ([[User talk:Laurel Lodged|talk]]) 19:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
2524 +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2521 +++$+++ 2523 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.305205740E09 +++$+++ There is a loss of information. You removed the information on the descent of the title. Also, I can find no source that the first Baron was a DL for County Wexford. The difference between the td and Derry can be easily explained.  +++$+++ :::There is a loss of information. You removed the information on the descent of the title. Also, I can find no source that the first Baron was a DL for County Wexford. The difference between the td and Derry can be easily explained. [[User:Tryde|Tryde]] ([[User talk:Tryde#top|talk]]) 06:09, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
2525 +++$+++ Laurel Lodged +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2521 +++$+++ 2524 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.305342360E09 +++$+++ What was the info loss exactly? Please explain the difference between the td and Derry easily.  +++$+++ ::::What was the info loss exactly? Please explain the difference between the td and Derry easily. [[User:Laurel Lodged|Laurel Lodged]] ([[User talk:Laurel Lodged|talk]]) 20:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
2526 +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2521 +++$+++ 2525 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.305386760E09 +++$+++ You removed the territorial designation. You removed the information on the descent of the title, i. e. the first Baron was succeeded by his son who was in his turn succeeded by his son, and so on. The descent of the title is explained in peerage articles. As I said above I can find no source for the statement that the first Baron was a DL for Wexford. I have expanded a little on the difference between the territorial designation and the present location of Templemore. As far as I understand it is not uncommon for county boundaries to be moved.  +++$+++ :::::You removed the territorial designation. You removed the information on the descent of the title, i. e. the first Baron was succeeded by his son who was in his turn succeeded by his son, and so on. The descent of the title is explained in peerage articles. As I said above I can find no source for the statement that the first Baron was a DL for Wexford. I have expanded a little on the difference between the territorial designation and the present location of Templemore. As far as I understand it is not uncommon for county boundaries to be moved. [[User:Tryde|Tryde]] ([[User talk:Tryde#top|talk]]) 08:26, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
2527 +++$+++ Laurel Lodged +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2521 +++$+++ 2526 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.305415200E09 +++$+++ It's more verbose than it needs to be but I can live with it. The Templemore note is good.  +++$+++ ::::::It's more verbose than it needs to be but I can live with it. The Templemore note is good. [[User:Laurel Lodged|Laurel Lodged]] ([[User talk:Laurel Lodged|talk]]) 16:20, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

264666 +++$+++ Elad189 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-28 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.248835740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Elad189|Elad189]] ([[User talk:Elad189|talk]]) 19:49, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
264667 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264666 +++$+++ 264666 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ It's good to see it in much better shape than it was! Hope you're enjoying Wikipedia, now you know the ropes. 19:51, 28 July 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ :It's good to see it in much better shape than it was! Hope you're enjoying Wikipedia, now you know the ropes. 19:51, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
264668 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264666 +++$+++ 264666 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.248903420E09 +++$+++ You're probably right about Wikipedia. I often think of the day when it will be no more. Still, I'm having fun while it lasts. Thank you for your interest in my life, sleeping patterns and employment. Forgive me if I decline to divulge specific information to a random anonymous vandal, other than to say I'm doing alright, thank you very much.  +++$+++ :You're probably right about Wikipedia. I often think of the day when it will be no more. Still, I'm having fun while it lasts. Thank you for your interest in my life, sleeping patterns and employment. Forgive me if I decline to divulge specific information to a random anonymous vandal, other than to say I'm doing alright, thank you very much. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
264669 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264666 +++$+++ 264666 +++$+++ 2009-08-01 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.249174380E09 +++$+++ Your assumptions personal attacks against me are rather inappropriate. But, let's get to Wikipedia policy. Articles about [[WP:BLP|living people]] must be supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Period. Forums are not reliable sources (would you expect the ''Encyclopedia Brittanica'' to be informed by a bunch of anonymous people in a forum who can write anything?). Someone's blog isn't a reliable source. Can you show me an ''Independent'' or ''Guardian'' article, or a published book (encyclopedia, etc.) with that information? If you can't, then inclusion is against Wikipedia policy.  +++$+++ :Your assumptions personal attacks against me are rather inappropriate. But, let's get to Wikipedia policy. Articles about [[WP:BLP|living people]] must be supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Period. Forums are not reliable sources (would you expect the ''Encyclopedia Brittanica'' to be informed by a bunch of anonymous people in a forum who can write anything?). Someone's blog isn't a reliable source. Can you show me an ''Independent'' or ''Guardian'' article, or a published book (encyclopedia, etc.) with that information? If you can't, then inclusion is against Wikipedia policy. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
264670 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264666 +++$+++ 264666 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.249280100E09 +++$+++ Indeed. A culture when we can communicate freely with each other and write without censorship. Wonderful indeed.  +++$+++ :Indeed. A culture when we can communicate freely with each other and write without censorship. Wonderful indeed. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
264671 +++$+++ Little grape +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264666 +++$+++ 264670 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.249088640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for speedy protection on [[Jonathan King]]. And I'm not quite sure what a rich magnet is, but 24\/7 patrolling is most certainly a proper job....  +++$+++ ::Thanks for speedy protection on [[Jonathan King]]. And I'm not quite sure what a rich magnet is, but 24/7 patrolling is most certainly a proper job.... [[User:Little grape|Little grape]] ([[User talk:Little grape|talk]]) 18:04, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

526812 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526812 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-03 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.188884100E09 +++$+++ How about if I moved the page back to \"List of famous U.S. Marines\"?  I mean the title of the page sould match the subject or subjects. The title as \"is\" really makes no sense at all, to the casual reader it call be misunderstood that it can refer to almost anyone who was or is a Marine. What do think?  +++$+++ How about if I moved the page back to "List of famous U.S. Marines"?  I mean the title of the page sould match the subject or subjects. The title as "is" really makes no sense at all, to the casual reader it call be misunderstood that it can refer to almost anyone who was or is a Marine. What do think? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 22:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
526813 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526812 +++$+++ 526812 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.188885600E09 +++$+++ Done!  +++$+++ *Done! [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
526814 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526812 +++$+++ 526813 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.188958980E09 +++$+++ It was moved back because of a stupid and senseless rule: \"Per guideline, lists should not have \"famous\" in their titles\". You go figure. Hwo about \"notable\"? Should we try that?  +++$+++ **It was moved back because of a stupid and senseless rule: "Per guideline, lists should not have "famous" in their titles". You go figure. Hwo about "notable"? Should we try that? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 19:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

526815 +++$+++ OsamaKBOT +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-07 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.189215360E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=ERcheck this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags\/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 18:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. '''If you believe you received this message in error, please notify [[user_talk:OsamaK|the bot's owner]].''' <!-- Template:Di-no source-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=ERcheck this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 18:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. '''If you believe you received this message in error, please notify [[user_talk:OsamaK|the bot's owner]].''' <!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> [[User:OsamaKBOT|OsamaKBOT]] 18:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
526816 +++$+++ Pedant +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526815 +++$+++ 526815 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.190179920E09 +++$+++ Like I said, I'm not on Wikipedia all the time, so a year-old mop seems pretty new to me. Thanks for your help.  +++$+++ :Like I said, I'm not on Wikipedia all the time, so a year-old mop seems pretty new to me. Thanks for your help. [[User:Pedant|User:Pedant]] 22:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

2528 +++$+++ Laurel Lodged +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-13 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.305342540E09 +++$+++ I've noticed that a few Barons in the Peerage of Ireland have been removed from this category. Is this a systematic sweep? I've noticed that a few Barons in the Peerage of the United Kingdom have been removed from their category. Is this a systematic sweep? Do you have a broad baron issue?  +++$+++ I've noticed that a few Barons in the Peerage of Ireland have been removed from this category. Is this a systematic sweep? I've noticed that a few Barons in the Peerage of the United Kingdom have been removed from their category. Is this a systematic sweep? Do you have a broad baron issue? [[User:Laurel Lodged|Laurel Lodged]] ([[User talk:Laurel Lodged|talk]]) 20:09, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
2529 +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2528 +++$+++ 2528 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.305386760E09 +++$+++ No, this is not a systematic sweep. Peers should only be categorised under their highest title. For example, the Dukes of Abercorn are also barons in the Irish peerage and earls in the Scottish peerage but should only be categorised as Dukes in the Peerage of Ireland. Likewise, Lord Curzon was also an Irish baron but should be categorised as a Marquess of the Peerage of the United Kingdom. Otherwise we would end up with a complete muddle in the category sections. I have tried to correct this.  +++$+++ :No, this is not a systematic sweep. Peers should only be categorised under their highest title. For example, the Dukes of Abercorn are also barons in the Irish peerage and earls in the Scottish peerage but should only be categorised as Dukes in the Peerage of Ireland. Likewise, Lord Curzon was also an Irish baron but should be categorised as a Marquess of the Peerage of the United Kingdom. Otherwise we would end up with a complete muddle in the category sections. I have tried to correct this. [[User:Tryde|Tryde]] ([[User talk:Tryde#top|talk]]) 08:26, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
2530 +++$+++ Laurel Lodged +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2528 +++$+++ 2529 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.305415260E09 +++$+++ Fair enough.  +++$+++ ::Fair enough. [[User:Laurel Lodged|Laurel Lodged]] ([[User talk:Laurel Lodged|talk]]) 16:21, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

175184 +++$+++ EEng +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-25 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.277459400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 02:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
175185 +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175184 +++$+++ 175184 +++$+++ 2010-06-25 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.277472240E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but according to me, in the direction of standardization, the fact that only US (sometimes UK) states are mentioned, while for foreign countries '''no''', is a bias. I think any country should have the same dignity. Notice that I revert that just in twin towns  '''lists'''. I always leave the US city name-state format hidden in the link, while  the city name alone is mentioned. So if you click you are immediately send to the correct city. Where is the problem?<p>As for '''incivility''', I apologize, but sometimes I am really tired of the dumbness and lack of culture I notice here! What can I do? What will you do if you're working here and find 10000 times written \"Porland\" instead of \"Portland\"? Or the humiliating silliness of fans writing articles about singers and similar? I really seem 90% people has never read a '''true''' encyclopedia in their life! But you're true. I will stop and stay silent for the sake of philanthropy. Ciao, thanks and good work!! <p> +++$+++ :Sorry, but according to me, in the direction of standardization, the fact that only US (sometimes UK) states are mentioned, while for foreign countries '''no''', is a bias. I think any country should have the same dignity. Notice that I revert that just in twin towns  '''lists'''. I always leave the US city name-state format hidden in the link, while  the city name alone is mentioned. So if you click you are immediately send to the correct city. Where is the problem?<p>As for '''incivility''', I apologize, but sometimes I am really tired of the dumbness and lack of culture I notice here! What can I do? What will you do if you're working here and find 10000 times written "Porland" instead of "Portland"? Or the humiliating silliness of fans writing articles about singers and similar? I really seem 90% people has never read a '''true''' encyclopedia in their life! But you're true. I will stop and stay silent for the sake of philanthropy. Ciao, thanks and good work!! <p>[[User:Attilios|&#39;&#39;&#39;Attilios&#39;&#39;&#39;]] ([[User talk:Attilios|talk]]) 06:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

526819 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.190356800E09 +++$+++ The MoH images are being removed from the infoboxes by [[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]]. I know that you went through a lot of trouble placing these in infoboxes, so I thought that I would ask you to comment on that.  +++$+++ The MoH images are being removed from the infoboxes by [[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]]. I know that you went through a lot of trouble placing these in infoboxes, so I thought that I would ask you to comment on that. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
526820 +++$+++ Woodym555 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526819 +++$+++ 526819 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.190363400E09 +++$+++ I agree, i edit VC articles and know that it can look good and act as a guide. Yet, if the correct infobox is being used then it will also list MOH under the awards section. The infobox is primarily a summary of their life, quick access to all the information. If a picture of the recipient is available then that should always be used. The medal can go later on in the paragraph. I apologise if you feel left out of the conservation, that was not my intention. I continued the discussion on the [[WT:MILHIST]] page because that is where the discussion would get the most \"footfall\". Infoboxes would start to get congestedif you started listing awards. Some would argue, perhaps erroneously, for the inclusion of other awards. What if someone is awarded honorary distinctions of a very \"high Order\", would we then include all of them? Do we show all the ribbons in the infobox? I think the main image should be the image of the recipient. I understand that this is a highly \"emotional\" (for lack of a better synonym) topic. These people are truly remarkable people who have done remarkable things. Yet each recipient is different. For some, this will be the defining moment in their life. For others this will be the start of even greater things. That is my opinion anyway.   +++$+++ :I agree, i edit VC articles and know that it can look good and act as a guide. Yet, if the correct infobox is being used then it will also list MOH under the awards section. The infobox is primarily a summary of their life, quick access to all the information. If a picture of the recipient is available then that should always be used. The medal can go later on in the paragraph. I apologise if you feel left out of the conservation, that was not my intention. I continued the discussion on the [[WT:MILHIST]] page because that is where the discussion would get the most "footfall". Infoboxes would start to get congestedif you started listing awards. Some would argue, perhaps erroneously, for the inclusion of other awards. What if someone is awarded honorary distinctions of a very "high Order", would we then include all of them? Do we show all the ribbons in the infobox? I think the main image should be the image of the recipient. I understand that this is a highly "emotional" (for lack of a better synonym) topic. These people are truly remarkable people who have done remarkable things. Yet each recipient is different. For some, this will be the defining moment in their life. For others this will be the start of even greater things. That is my opinion anyway.  [[User:Woodym555|Woodym555]] 01:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

2532 +++$+++ Sarah777 +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2532 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-13 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.308025980E09 +++$+++ Would you please restore the proposed move request tag to the misnamed article about John Barran?  +++$+++ Would you please restore the proposed move request tag to the misnamed article about John Barran? [[User:Sarah777|Sarah777]] ([[User talk:Sarah777|talk]]) 21:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
2533 +++$+++ Mtking +++$+++ Tryde +++$+++ 2532 +++$+++ 2532 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.308027000E09 +++$+++ I have reinserted [[User:Sarah777|Sarah777]] move request - it is was not \"a nonsense tag\", please let the discussion take place and let everyone have a chance to discuss it rather than you decide on your own.  +++$+++ : I have reinserted [[User:Sarah777|Sarah777]] move request - it is was not "a nonsense tag", please let the discussion take place and let everyone have a chance to discuss it rather than you decide on your own. [[User:Mtking|Mtking]] ([[User talk:Mtking|talk]]) 21:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

526822 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-01 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.191228360E09 +++$+++ Hi buddy, of course I understand and tell you what, I agree with your action.  However, I do know for a fact that Mercer was a Marine, but what I'm going to do is let my son (who now writes for Ringside Reports), look up for any reliable source or sources. If he finds them and only if he finds them, only then will I add Mercer's name once more. Semper Fi.  +++$+++ Hi buddy, of course I understand and tell you what, I agree with your action.  However, I do know for a fact that Mercer was a Marine, but what I'm going to do is let my son (who now writes for Ringside Reports), look up for any reliable source or sources. If he finds them and only if he finds them, only then will I add Mercer's name once more. Semper Fi. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
526823 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526822 +++$+++ 526822 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.191230520E09 +++$+++ I take it back, I don't know it for a fact, (I got him confused with Leon Spinks whom I've had the pleasure of meeting). I did tell my son to look into Mercer.  +++$+++ *I take it back, I don't know it for a fact, (I got him confused with Leon Spinks whom I've had the pleasure of meeting). I did tell my son to look into Mercer. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

264679 +++$+++ Scotness +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-01 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.249154340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Scotness|Scotness]] ([[User talk:Scotness|talk]]) 12:19, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
264680 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264679 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-01 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.249154580E09 +++$+++ When you upload the images you have a choice. You can either release them as non-free images (where you retain copyright), but then the image use must be justified (not for decoration). Or, you can allow the images to be use freely by anyone.  +++$+++ ::When you upload the images you have a choice. You can either release them as non-free images (where you retain copyright), but then the image use must be justified (not for decoration). Or, you can allow the images to be use freely by anyone. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

526824 +++$+++ AntonioMartin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526824 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-01 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191232260E09 +++$+++ '' +++$+++ ''[[User:AntonioMartin|Antonio Shaggy Daddy Martin]]'' 02:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
526825 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526824 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.191236040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for looking.  Do you have a reference in a published biography or a U.S. government source?  &mdash;  +++$+++ :: Thanks for looking.  Do you have a reference in a published biography or a U.S. government source?  &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 03:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

264681 +++$+++ Scotness +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-01 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.249154940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Scotness|Scotness]] ([[User talk:Scotness|talk]]) 12:29, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
264682 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264681 +++$+++ 264681 +++$+++ 2009-08-01 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.249175100E09 +++$+++ Enjoy your block.  +++$+++ :Enjoy your block. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:05, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
264683 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264681 +++$+++ 264681 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.249260480E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but there is no assertion of notability, seeing as it is not a real place. Please read [[WP:FICT]]. I have had to review many of your articles and see that you are failing to include referenecs. It is advisable to spend more time creating well-researched and referenced articles rather than little poor stubs.  +++$+++ :Sorry, but there is no assertion of notability, seeing as it is not a real place. Please read [[WP:FICT]]. I have had to review many of your articles and see that you are failing to include referenecs. It is advisable to spend more time creating well-researched and referenced articles rather than little poor stubs. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
264684 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264681 +++$+++ 264681 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.249417860E09 +++$+++ Hi. Yes, you're right, but it was [[Titanic (1997 film)]] rather than the discussion with you. I'll keep an eye on it all.  +++$+++ :Hi. Yes, you're right, but it was [[Titanic (1997 film)]] rather than the discussion with you. I'll keep an eye on it all. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
264685 +++$+++ Crotchety Old Man +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264681 +++$+++ 264681 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.249419540E09 +++$+++ LOL.  I always love the baseless sock-puppetry accusation.  Nice and subtle.  +++$+++ :LOL.  I always love the baseless sock-puppetry accusation.  Nice and subtle. [[User:Crotchety Old Man|Crotchety Old Man]] ([[User talk:Crotchety Old Man|talk]]) 13:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

2538 +++$+++ Kevlar67 +++$+++ Jwkozak91 +++$+++ 2538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-26 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.256612580E09 +++$+++ Perhaps we need a article as well as a list.  [[Place naming in Western Canada]] or similar. -- +++$+++ Perhaps we need a article as well as a list.  [[Place naming in Western Canada]] or similar. --[[User:Kevlar67|Kevlar]] <small>([[User talk:Kevlar67|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kevlar67|contribs]])</small> 20:03, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
2539 +++$+++ Kevlar67 +++$+++ Jwkozak91 +++$+++ 2538 +++$+++ 2538 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.256893740E09 +++$+++ I've built on your changes, see if you approve. -- +++$+++ : I've built on your changes, see if you approve. --[[User:Kevlar67|Kevlar]] <small>([[User talk:Kevlar67|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kevlar67|contribs]])</small> 02:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
2540 +++$+++ Kevlar67 +++$+++ Jwkozak91 +++$+++ 2538 +++$+++ 2538 +++$+++ 2010-09-06 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.283811060E09 +++$+++ I believe that Freedom was originally a German settlement and the name was changed during the anti-German wave of WWI, but I don't have any evidence for that.  The location and spelling for Halych are taken from a map published by the County of Westlock so I think it is authoritative.  -- +++$+++ : I believe that Freedom was originally a German settlement and the name was changed during the anti-German wave of WWI, but I don't have any evidence for that.  The location and spelling for Halych are taken from a map published by the County of Westlock so I think it is authoritative.  --[[User:Kevlar67|Kevlar]] <small>([[User talk:Kevlar67|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kevlar67|contribs]])</small> 15:11, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

526827 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526827 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-06 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.191739560E09 +++$+++ I have noticed a lot of pages getting modified by the COBot bot for people with different medals.  Was that something that was consensus or a personal initiative on someones part. I know its not your bot but I figured you might now. -- +++$+++ I have noticed a lot of pages getting modified by the COBot bot for people with different medals.  Was that something that was consensus or a personal initiative on someones part. I know its not your bot but I figured you might now. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] 23:46, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
526828 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526827 +++$+++ 526827 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.191739980E09 +++$+++ There was a series of CFDs on it--part of the craze to convert to lists. To get there, call up page history on the article, click on the cat in question, and click \"this article's entry\" on the cfd notice. If there are cats you're interested in, set a watch on the cat itself and you'll see when the notice tag is put there, that's what I do.  +++$+++ :There was a series of CFDs on it--part of the craze to convert to lists. To get there, call up page history on the article, click on the cat in question, and click "this article's entry" on the cfd notice. If there are cats you're interested in, set a watch on the cat itself and you'll see when the notice tag is put there, that's what I do. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 23:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
526829 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526827 +++$+++ 526828 +++$+++ 2007-10-07 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.191741060E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I wished I would have known about those conversations because I do not agree with their decission.  I agree with the argument that some awards are relatively minor and don't rate to be a category but even in the case of the Medal of Honor with relatively few recipients the lists are extremely long and must be split up on multiple pages.  If we create lists for recipients of the Air Medal which has many more recipients the lists may be thousands of members long or span a large number of pages. Too late now though I guess, just my 2 cents.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks, I wished I would have known about those conversations because I do not agree with their decission.  I agree with the argument that some awards are relatively minor and don't rate to be a category but even in the case of the Medal of Honor with relatively few recipients the lists are extremely long and must be split up on multiple pages.  If we create lists for recipients of the Air Medal which has many more recipients the lists may be thousands of members long or span a large number of pages. Too late now though I guess, just my 2 cents.--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] 00:11, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

2541 +++$+++ 205.200.78.142 +++$+++ Jwkozak91 +++$+++ 2541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-16 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.266333780E09 +++$+++ I notice that there was a time when you did make some additions to this article. I have expanded the Ukrainian article in the Ukrainian Wikipedia. I would have done the same here, but someone erroneously labelled me as a vandalizer and I am barred from editing the English version. Could you expand this article on the basis of the UkrWiki, please.  --[[Special:Contributions\/205.200.78.142|205.200.78.142]] ( +++$+++ I notice that there was a time when you did make some additions to this article. I have expanded the Ukrainian article in the Ukrainian Wikipedia. I would have done the same here, but someone erroneously labelled me as a vandalizer and I am barred from editing the English version. Could you expand this article on the basis of the UkrWiki, please.  --[[Special:Contributions/205.200.78.142|205.200.78.142]] ([[User talk:205.200.78.142|talk]]) 07:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
2542 +++$+++ Jwkozak91 +++$+++ Jwkozak91 +++$+++ 2541 +++$+++ 2541 +++$+++ 2010-02-16 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.266334920E09 +++$+++ I'll try, but \u043c\u043e\u0454 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0446\u0456 is not very \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0435. Anyway, \u0434\u044f\u043a\u0443\u044e for asking.  +++$+++ :I'll try, but моє Українці is not very добре. Anyway, дякую for asking. [[User:Jwkozak91|Jwkozak91]] ([[User talk:Jwkozak91#top|talk]]) 07:42, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

264686 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-08 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.249797120E09 +++$+++ [[Psycho (1960 film)]] has been nominated for a [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|good article reassessment]]. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|good article quality]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are [[Talk:Psycho (1960 film){{#if:1|\/GA1}}|here]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ [[Psycho (1960 film)]] has been nominated for a [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|good article reassessment]]. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|good article quality]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are [[Talk:Psycho (1960 film){{#if:1|/GA1}}|here]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 22:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
264687 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264686 +++$+++ 264686 +++$+++ 2009-08-08 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.249797180E09 +++$+++ On to it -- cheers.  +++$+++ :On to it -- cheers. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:53, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
264688 +++$+++ Steve +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264686 +++$+++ 264687 +++$+++ 2009-08-09 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.249879200E09 +++$+++ Ha, just noticed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Psycho_%281960_film%29&diff=307043368&oldid=307039985 this]. I'm trimming the section right now and that was literally the ''first'' thing I removed. :-)  +++$+++ ::Ha, just noticed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Psycho_%281960_film%29&diff=307043368&oldid=307039985 this]. I'm trimming the section right now and that was literally the ''first'' thing I removed. :-) [[User:Steve|<span style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''Steve'''</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Steve|T]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Steve|C]]</sup> 21:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

522010 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ D-Day +++$+++ 522010 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-08 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.149758460E09 +++$+++ I finally started an article on USAR in [[User:Royalbroil\/Sandbox|my sandbox]]. I'm torn what to call the article. Should it be \"Hooters Pro Cup\", \"USAR Pro Cup\", \"USAR Hooter Pro Cup\", etc.? There will need to be quite a few redirects to this article. Please review the article and comment\/contribute. Please leave comments on my main userpage under the USAR section (#4). Thx  +++$+++ I finally started an article on USAR in [[User:Royalbroil/Sandbox|my sandbox]]. I'm torn what to call the article. Should it be "Hooters Pro Cup", "USAR Pro Cup", "USAR Hooter Pro Cup", etc.? There will need to be quite a few redirects to this article. Please review the article and comment/contribute. Please leave comments on my main userpage under the USAR section (#4). Thx [[User:Royalbroil|Royalbroil]] 02:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
522011 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ D-Day +++$+++ 522010 +++$+++ 522010 +++$+++ 2006-06-09 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.149854760E09 +++$+++ I suspect you missed my request. Please comment so I can move it to article space. You can edit it there if you'd like. I am anxious to get started on the NASCAR AutoZone Elite Division, Midwest Series article with User:Bdman.  +++$+++ :I suspect you missed my request. Please comment so I can move it to article space. You can edit it there if you'd like. I am anxious to get started on the NASCAR AutoZone Elite Division, Midwest Series article with User:Bdman. [[User:Royalbroil|Royalbroil]] 05:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

526835 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-09 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.191998520E09 +++$+++ I wanted to let you know that I created a template for publc domain info from the Marine Corps {{{{Marine Corps}}}}.-- +++$+++ I wanted to let you know that I created a template for publc domain info from the Marine Corps {{{{Marine Corps}}}}.--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] 23:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
526836 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526835 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.192086900E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I didn't think so but I wanted to ask.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks, I didn't think so but I wanted to ask.--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] 00:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

2548 +++$+++ Ryulong +++$+++ Jwkozak91 +++$+++ 2548 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.300931580E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=The_Amazing_Race_18&diff=420005259&oldid=420002648 Language icons] are only necessary when it is a link to a page that is not in English. You do not need to label different languages in text.\u2014 +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Amazing_Race_18&diff=420005259&oldid=420002648 Language icons] are only necessary when it is a link to a page that is not in English. You do not need to label different languages in text.—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>]]) 18:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
2549 +++$+++ Jwkozak91 +++$+++ Jwkozak91 +++$+++ 2548 +++$+++ 2548 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.300932240E09 +++$+++ Oh - OK, sorry! I won't make that mistake again! \u2013  +++$+++ :Oh - OK, sorry! I won't make that mistake again! – [[User:Jwkozak91|Jwkozak91]] ([[User_talk:Jwkozak91|talk]]) 19:04, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

526838 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526838 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-13 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.192326060E09 +++$+++ All the best,  +++$+++ All the best, [[User:EyeSerene|<font color="RoyalBlue">EyeSerene</font>]]''<sup><small>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<font color="OliveDrab">TALK</font>]]</small></sup>'' 18:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
526839 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526838 +++$+++ 526838 +++$+++ 2007-10-14 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.192393320E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the great work so far - in case you haven't already seen them, I have left follow-up comments on [[User talk:Kumioko]] in response to his comments on my talk page. All the best,  +++$+++ :Thank you for the great work so far - in case you haven't already seen them, I have left follow-up comments on [[User talk:Kumioko]] in response to his comments on my talk page. All the best, [[User:EyeSerene|<font color="RoyalBlue">EyeSerene</font>]]''<sup><small>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<font color="OliveDrab">TALK</font>]]</small></sup>'' 13:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

264695 +++$+++ Multixfer +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-11 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.252728780E09 +++$+++ This person is back and once again adding totally unreferenced information about nonexistent films (possible hoaxes) to Wikipedia.  +++$+++ This person is back and once again adding totally unreferenced information about nonexistent films (possible hoaxes) to Wikipedia. [[User:Multixfer|&lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt;]] ([[User talk:Multixfer|talk]]) 21:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
264696 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264695 +++$+++ 264695 +++$+++ 2009-09-11 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.252732380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. I've taken appropriate action.  +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know. I've taken appropriate action. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
264697 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264695 +++$+++ 264695 +++$+++ 2009-10-02 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.254530040E09 +++$+++ You expect me to research 50+ articles?  +++$+++ :You expect me to research 50+ articles? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
264698 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264695 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-02 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.254530700E09 +++$+++ By deleting the images I ''am'' fixing the problem. The problem is that these hundreds of images violate Wikipedia's core principle of being a free encyclopedia. The expectation is that those who want non-free images retained to do the work an justify their inclusion in a free encyclopedia.  +++$+++ :::By deleting the images I ''am'' fixing the problem. The problem is that these hundreds of images violate Wikipedia's core principle of being a free encyclopedia. The expectation is that those who want non-free images retained to do the work an justify their inclusion in a free encyclopedia. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
264699 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264695 +++$+++ 264695 +++$+++ 2009-10-02 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.254531480E09 +++$+++ Mike is probably correct in that the radio and TV stations are unlikely to object. That does not make it open-season for non-free media. I don't see a consensus in those links.  +++$+++ :Mike is probably correct in that the radio and TV stations are unlikely to object. That does not make it open-season for non-free media. I don't see a consensus in those links. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
264700 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264695 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-02 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.254536580E09 +++$+++ I myself am a geek and I do enjoy looking through old images (TV Ark, for instance, is a great website). Logos can tell a lot about the evolution of a station of changes of ownership. But, we need sufficient prose to justify their inclusion. Quality over quantity. Can you point to a concrete guideline that supports your assertion. Have the discussions to which you point led to anything that supersedes [[Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Non-free_image_use_in_galleries]]?  +++$+++ :::I myself am a geek and I do enjoy looking through old images (TV Ark, for instance, is a great website). Logos can tell a lot about the evolution of a station of changes of ownership. But, we need sufficient prose to justify their inclusion. Quality over quantity. Can you point to a concrete guideline that supports your assertion. Have the discussions to which you point led to anything that supersedes [[Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Non-free_image_use_in_galleries]]? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:23, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
264701 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264695 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-02 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.254549420E09 +++$+++ Yes, it's not only a question of the galleries, it's the critical commentary aspect; dispersing the images as thumbnails throughout the article doesn't work either, I'm afraid. I've seen a few articles through the [[WP:FAC]] process, so know what standards we are aiming for. For instance, I was forced to remove ''one'' screenshot showing two characters next to a description of those characters, because the image provided no more information.  +++$+++ ::::::Yes, it's not only a question of the galleries, it's the critical commentary aspect; dispersing the images as thumbnails throughout the article doesn't work either, I'm afraid. I've seen a few articles through the [[WP:FAC]] process, so know what standards we are aiming for. For instance, I was forced to remove ''one'' screenshot showing two characters next to a description of those characters, because the image provided no more information. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:57, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

2552 +++$+++ 66.68.99.162 +++$+++ Jwkozak91 +++$+++ 2552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.311562980E09 +++$+++ Under lists of territories on this article, Sudan was REPLACED by South Sudan. How did this happen? Sudan is still a country. Just because South Sudan broke away and got independence, doesn't mean the rest of Sudan disappeared off the face of the earth. The country of Sudan (capital Khartoum) still exists and needs to be edited BACK IN to this article. I don't know why someone just replaced it with South Sudan. Should I edit this or could you? [[Special:Contributions\/66.68.99.162|66.68.99.162]] ( +++$+++ Under lists of territories on this article, Sudan was REPLACED by South Sudan. How did this happen? Sudan is still a country. Just because South Sudan broke away and got independence, doesn't mean the rest of Sudan disappeared off the face of the earth. The country of Sudan (capital Khartoum) still exists and needs to be edited BACK IN to this article. I don't know why someone just replaced it with South Sudan. Should I edit this or could you? [[Special:Contributions/66.68.99.162|66.68.99.162]] ([[User talk:66.68.99.162|talk]]) 20:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
2553 +++$+++ Jwkozak91 +++$+++ Jwkozak91 +++$+++ 2552 +++$+++ 2552 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.311578820E09 +++$+++ \"66.68.99.162\": [[Sudan]] is under [[Northern Africa]] in the [[Africa#Territories and regions|Territories and regions table]]. [[South Sudan]] is under [[Eastern Africa]]. \u2013  +++$+++ :"66.68.99.162": [[Sudan]] is under [[Northern Africa]] in the [[Africa#Territories and regions|Territories and regions table]]. [[South Sudan]] is under [[Eastern Africa]]. – [[User:Jwkozak91|Jwkozak91]] ([[User_talk:Jwkozak91|talk]]) 00:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

437332 +++$+++ SimonP +++$+++ Zappaz +++$+++ 437332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-31 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.112315820E09 +++$+++ A vote to merge is always also a vote to redirect as we must follow the GFDL attribution rules. Merge and delete is not a valid option see [[Wikipedia:Guide to Votes for Deletion#Incompatible votes]]. -  +++$+++ A vote to merge is always also a vote to redirect as we must follow the GFDL attribution rules. Merge and delete is not a valid option see [[Wikipedia:Guide to Votes for Deletion#Incompatible votes]]. - [[User:SimonP|SimonP]] 16:37, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
437333 +++$+++ SimonP +++$+++ Zappaz +++$+++ 437332 +++$+++ 437332 +++$+++ 2005-03-31 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.112327220E09 +++$+++ I agree the current sitution isn't ideal.  Your best option might be to list it at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion]]-  +++$+++ :I agree the current sitution isn't ideal.  Your best option might be to list it at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion]]- [[User:SimonP|SimonP]] 19:47, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

2554 +++$+++ Rosetown +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-12 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.234441500E09 +++$+++ Recently you have made numerous good faith edits to the Air Canada article, some of which added unreferenced detail.  I suggest you revisit those edits and provide appropriate references or delete the added detail.  Your attention to the article is much appreciated. -- +++$+++ Recently you have made numerous good faith edits to the Air Canada article, some of which added unreferenced detail.  I suggest you revisit those edits and provide appropriate references or delete the added detail.  Your attention to the article is much appreciated. --[[User:Rosetown|Rosetown]] ([[User talk:Rosetown|talk]]) 04:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
2555 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2554 +++$+++ 2554 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.234442040E09 +++$+++ Thx for the suggestion, may I point out that the edits I made, mainly expanding the lead, are all summarizing\/rearranging existing information that is in the article body.  Those areas likely would share the same references, which I may get around to if I have the time, but I am not the originator of those references.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Thx for the suggestion, may I point out that the edits I made, mainly expanding the lead, are all summarizing/rearranging existing information that is in the article body.  Those areas likely would share the same references, which I may get around to if I have the time, but I am not the originator of those references.  Regards, [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 04:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
2556 +++$+++ Rosetown +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2554 +++$+++ 2555 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.234446900E09 +++$+++ My apologies, I was too fast off the mark, and didn't properly peruse your many edits.  Regards -- +++$+++ ::My apologies, I was too fast off the mark, and didn't properly peruse your many edits.  Regards --[[User:Rosetown|Rosetown]] ([[User talk:Rosetown|talk]]) 05:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

2558 +++$+++ 69.65.224.246 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-22 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.242989280E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/69.65.224.246|69.65.224.246]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/69.65.224.246|69.65.224.246]] ([[User talk:69.65.224.246|talk]]) 03:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
2559 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2558 +++$+++ 2558 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.242990540E09 +++$+++ Here is a list of articles which have reached good standing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Automobiles#Example_articles]] You are certainly entitled to your opinion, and certainly you have valid points, but in my experience the guidelines have the final say. Any contributions that have longevity on this site need to abide by them or they will eventually get deleted by someone, particularly certain wiki editors who focus entirely on patrolling articles and enforcing guidelines.  So in the end it's best to just work with them IMO.  It is relatively easy to find a press release, but with some time spent reading reliable third-party references one can usually find the information from a neutral source.  Otherwise one can look at for instance [[Audi]] and see that the use of press information makes the article suspect in the eyes of editors here.  Regards  +++$+++ :Here is a list of articles which have reached good standing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Automobiles#Example_articles]] You are certainly entitled to your opinion, and certainly you have valid points, but in my experience the guidelines have the final say. Any contributions that have longevity on this site need to abide by them or they will eventually get deleted by someone, particularly certain wiki editors who focus entirely on patrolling articles and enforcing guidelines.  So in the end it's best to just work with them IMO.  It is relatively easy to find a press release, but with some time spent reading reliable third-party references one can usually find the information from a neutral source.  Otherwise one can look at for instance [[Audi]] and see that the use of press information makes the article suspect in the eyes of editors here.  Regards [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 04:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
2560 +++$+++ 69.65.224.246 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2558 +++$+++ 2559 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.243116420E09 +++$+++ I see your point.  I removed the caps on all of the Toyota trademarks, there's really no point in leaving some but not others.  I'll probably add a few more details to the LS section and more or less retire from wikipedia for the most part in the next week, there really isn't that much more I can think of adding.   I have noticed some of the Audi and to a lesser extent Mercedes articles appear to be written by someone working at the company. [[Special:Contributions\/69.65.224.246|69.65.224.246]] ( +++$+++ ::I see your point.  I removed the caps on all of the Toyota trademarks, there's really no point in leaving some but not others.  I'll probably add a few more details to the LS section and more or less retire from wikipedia for the most part in the next week, there really isn't that much more I can think of adding.   I have noticed some of the Audi and to a lesser extent Mercedes articles appear to be written by someone working at the company. [[Special:Contributions/69.65.224.246|69.65.224.246]] ([[User talk:69.65.224.246|talk]]) 15:07, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
2561 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2558 +++$+++ 2560 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.243123320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help. If you later think of making more contributions, that would be appreciated; we need as many dedicated auto editors as possible. Regards,  +++$+++ :::Thanks for your help. If you later think of making more contributions, that would be appreciated; we need as many dedicated auto editors as possible. Regards, [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 17:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

427808 +++$+++  +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 427808 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I have to voice my concern that this format is hurting the article. I will post this on a few notable election pages and hope that it's noticed. I have to admire the determination of whoever came up with this idea (it's apparently on every page) but ultimately, I think it should go. I think that having \"winner\/runner-up\" displayed so prominently in the infobox overshadows the importance of the election. Some of these elections were not mere contests, but were epic events in American history where a variety of important viewpoints were symbolically represented and voted upon. Just in the last 50 years, the notable political climates of 1968 and 2004 came to a boiling point around election time. We should not be placing so much emphasis on the \"winner\" and the \"runner-up\" -- this is not a spelling bee. If we condense this into who \"won\" we are doing a disservice to the issues that drove these elections. SpiderMMB 23:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ I have to voice my concern that this format is hurting the article. I will post this on a few notable election pages and hope that it's noticed. I have to admire the determination of whoever came up with this idea (it's apparently on every page) but ultimately, I think it should go. I think that having "winner/runner-up" displayed so prominently in the infobox overshadows the importance of the election. Some of these elections were not mere contests, but were epic events in American history where a variety of important viewpoints were symbolically represented and voted upon. Just in the last 50 years, the notable political climates of 1968 and 2004 came to a boiling point around election time. We should not be placing so much emphasis on the "winner" and the "runner-up" -- this is not a spelling bee. If we condense this into who "won" we are doing a disservice to the issues that drove these elections. SpiderMMB 23:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
427809 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 427808 +++$+++ 427808 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.193319600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the update, but I am not able to devote as much time to WP as normal right now. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Thanks for the update, but I am not able to devote as much time to WP as normal right now. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

526849 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-18 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.192736640E09 +++$+++ I know that we just got this up to GA status but I think with a little work we can get it up to FA.  I have submitted the [[Smedley Butler article up for Peer Review and I would appreciate any help you can provide.  I have never gotten an article up to GA status and I learned a lot so I want to keep going on it until it gets to FA.-- +++$+++ I know that we just got this up to GA status but I think with a little work we can get it up to FA.  I have submitted the [[Smedley Butler article up for Peer Review and I would appreciate any help you can provide.  I have never gotten an article up to GA status and I learned a lot so I want to keep going on it until it gets to FA.--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] 12:44, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
526850 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526849 +++$+++ 526849 +++$+++ 2007-10-19 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.192796280E09 +++$+++ Thanks, thats all good info-- +++$+++ :Thanks, thats all good info--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] 05:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

2562 +++$+++ John Nevard +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2562 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-05 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.244197080E09 +++$+++ Hey, you wouldn't mind copying the relevant paragraph on these new unique options to the talk page or some other location where I could check it over? I've never made a purchase on Amazon, or I'd check the page preview there. Guessing search keywords to try and find a sentence from pg. 184 gets a little old.  +++$+++ Hey, you wouldn't mind copying the relevant paragraph on these new unique options to the talk page or some other location where I could check it over? I've never made a purchase on Amazon, or I'd check the page preview there. Guessing search keywords to try and find a sentence from pg. 184 gets a little old. [[User:John Nevard|Nevard]] ([[User talk:John Nevard|talk]]) 03:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
2563 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2562 +++$+++ 2562 +++$+++ 2009-06-05 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.244197500E09 +++$+++ I quoted the sentence in the reference for your convenience: \"Additional options include: climate control front seats, parking sonar, power sunroof, power seats with memory, power rear sunshade, air purifier, rear seat heat and massage, power door closers, and dual level heated seats. Lexus incorporated the new technology to make driving the LS 430 more comfortable and pleasurable. Even with the navigation system and high end audio, the controls were still easy to operate. Apart from the Mark Levinson stereo, many of these items had been options in Japan for several years (a number could be found on the Celsior).\" Thus the preceding referred to the power sunshade, adjustable seats, power door closers etc.  The sentence states just that they have been found on prior JDM cars; this likely reflects the chauffeured JDM market for cars such as the Century, President etc.  +++$+++ :I quoted the sentence in the reference for your convenience: "Additional options include: climate control front seats, parking sonar, power sunroof, power seats with memory, power rear sunshade, air purifier, rear seat heat and massage, power door closers, and dual level heated seats. Lexus incorporated the new technology to make driving the LS 430 more comfortable and pleasurable. Even with the navigation system and high end audio, the controls were still easy to operate. Apart from the Mark Levinson stereo, many of these items had been options in Japan for several years (a number could be found on the Celsior)." Thus the preceding referred to the power sunshade, adjustable seats, power door closers etc.  The sentence states just that they have been found on prior JDM cars; this likely reflects the chauffeured JDM market for cars such as the Century, President etc. [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 03:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
2564 +++$+++ John Nevard +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2562 +++$+++ 2563 +++$+++ 2009-06-05 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.244241240E09 +++$+++ Cheers- I did have concerns with the implications that these features had been provided for the first time in the world by Toyota in the Japanese market (rather than previously only been provided in the Century, Crown, Celsior but not in the LS)- but I can't find any such statement in the current text. Nice work.  +++$+++ ::Cheers- I did have concerns with the implications that these features had been provided for the first time in the world by Toyota in the Japanese market (rather than previously only been provided in the Century, Crown, Celsior but not in the LS)- but I can't find any such statement in the current text. Nice work. [[User:John Nevard|Nevard]] ([[User talk:John Nevard|talk]]) 15:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
2565 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2562 +++$+++ 2563 +++$+++ 2009-06-06 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.244297580E09 +++$+++ No problemo, glad to help.  +++$+++ ::No problemo, glad to help. [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 07:13, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

526851 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-20 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.192887420E09 +++$+++ I'm thinking about re-doing the last sections in [[2\/9]], into the table type style which is becoming more common. Check my [[User:Marine 69-71\/Workshop|Workshop]] and feel free to tell me what you think and to do your thing.  +++$+++ I'm thinking about re-doing the last sections in [[2/9]], into the table type style which is becoming more common. Check my [[User:Marine 69-71/Workshop|Workshop]] and feel free to tell me what you think and to do your thing. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 06:37, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
526852 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526851 +++$+++ 526851 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.192949700E09 +++$+++ Thanks, so what do think of the \"new\" look?  +++$+++ *Thanks, so what do think of the "new" look? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:55, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

264709 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264709 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-07 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.254972480E09 +++$+++ Hello The JPS, this is an automated message from [[User:SDPatrolBot|SDPatrolBot]] to inform you the PROD template you added to [[Eartunes]] has been removed. It was removed by [[User:92.11.136.195|92.11.136.195]] with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider [[User_talk:92.11.136.195|discussing your concerns]] with 92.11.136.195 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to [[WP:AfD|AfD]] for community discussion. Thank you,  +++$+++ Hello The JPS, this is an automated message from [[User:SDPatrolBot|SDPatrolBot]] to inform you the PROD template you added to [[Eartunes]] has been removed. It was removed by [[User:92.11.136.195|92.11.136.195]] with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider [[User_talk:92.11.136.195|discussing your concerns]] with 92.11.136.195 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to [[WP:AfD|AfD]] for community discussion. Thank you, [[User:SDPatrolBot|SDPatrolBot]] ([[User talk:SDPatrolBot|talk]]) 20:28, 7 October 2009 (UTC) <small>([[Template:Bots|Learn how to opt out of these messages]])</small> 20:28, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
264710 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264709 +++$+++ 264709 +++$+++ 2009-10-11 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.255325760E09 +++$+++ Every editor experienced in writings and researching articles to comply with Wikipedia policy has agreed that usage of these images in this way is a breach of our non-free policy. You must understand that this is not ''I'' disliking these images: I am merely carrying out my administrative, janitorial duties by removing non-free media that harms out goal of being a free encyclopedia. Policy, the pillars, and the guidelines are absolutely clear.<br\/>In the meantime, most of those articles are an embarrassment; filled with crufty lists of current and past presenters, and rarely an inline citation to support the station histories, never mind justify the use of non-free media.  +++$+++ :Every editor experienced in writings and researching articles to comply with Wikipedia policy has agreed that usage of these images in this way is a breach of our non-free policy. You must understand that this is not ''I'' disliking these images: I am merely carrying out my administrative, janitorial duties by removing non-free media that harms out goal of being a free encyclopedia. Policy, the pillars, and the guidelines are absolutely clear.<br/>In the meantime, most of those articles are an embarrassment; filled with crufty lists of current and past presenters, and rarely an inline citation to support the station histories, never mind justify the use of non-free media. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:36, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
264711 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264709 +++$+++ 264710 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.255459080E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review#Elektra_Records.23Company_logos]]  +++$+++ ::[[Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review#Elektra_Records.23Company_logos]] [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

2566 +++$+++ H1nkles +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-08 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.244506740E09 +++$+++ I have done the GA Reassessment of the[[Lexus]] article as part of the GA Sweeps project.  I have found the article to be great and meet all the [[WP:GA Criteria]] except for several dead links in the reference section.  I am notifying you as the primary editor of this.  I have placed the article on hold for a week pending fixes of these references.  If you need more time or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page.   +++$+++ I have done the GA Reassessment of the[[Lexus]] article as part of the GA Sweeps project.  I have found the article to be great and meet all the [[WP:GA Criteria]] except for several dead links in the reference section.  I am notifying you as the primary editor of this.  I have placed the article on hold for a week pending fixes of these references.  If you need more time or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page.  [[User:H1nkles|H1nkles]] ([[User talk:H1nkles|talk]]) 17:19, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
2567 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2566 +++$+++ 2566 +++$+++ 2009-06-08 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.244528580E09 +++$+++ Greetings H1nkles, thanks for conducting the GA sweeps reassessment of [[Lexus]].  In accordance with your suggestions, I've replaced the defunct links.  Thanks again for your guidance. Regards,  +++$+++ :Greetings H1nkles, thanks for conducting the GA sweeps reassessment of [[Lexus]].  In accordance with your suggestions, I've replaced the defunct links.  Thanks again for your guidance. Regards, [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 23:23, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

526855 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.193215440E09 +++$+++ Sorry to be a bother but I had a couple of recommendations that I wanted to run by you.  I saw that you made a change to the format of the findagrave template and I wanted to suggest another.  I recommend that we add the Retrieved on and date thing to the end of the template.  In regards to another template I wanted to suggest another change.  I think we should modify the Age template to wikilink the from date like it does for the to date.  Let me know what you think.  I know that I should suggest these on the discussion pages for the templates but I wanted to run them by you first since you have been doing this for a while.-- +++$+++ Sorry to be a bother but I had a couple of recommendations that I wanted to run by you.  I saw that you made a change to the format of the findagrave template and I wanted to suggest another.  I recommend that we add the Retrieved on and date thing to the end of the template.  In regards to another template I wanted to suggest another change.  I think we should modify the Age template to wikilink the from date like it does for the to date.  Let me know what you think.  I know that I should suggest these on the discussion pages for the templates but I wanted to run them by you first since you have been doing this for a while.--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] 01:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
526856 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526855 +++$+++ 526855 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.193222040E09 +++$+++ Let me get back to you tomorrow. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Let me get back to you tomorrow. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 03:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
526857 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526855 +++$+++ 526856 +++$+++ 2007-10-26 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.193388420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the info. I appreciate the help.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the info. I appreciate the help.--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] 01:47, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

264712 +++$+++ Sottolacqua +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264712 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.255569180E09 +++$+++ Why are you continually hounding me on my talk page? If you've got an issue, bring it up to an administrator.  +++$+++ Why are you continually hounding me on my talk page? If you've got an issue, bring it up to an administrator. [[User:Sottolacqua|Sottolacqua]] ([[User talk:Sottolacqua|talk]]) 18:13, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
264713 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264712 +++$+++ 264712 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.255570200E09 +++$+++ I'm not hounding you. It's called communication. I am an administrator, but could happily ask someone else to try to discuss this with you. Edit summaries are a part of Wikipedia's editing conventions, a courtesy to editors with articles on their watchlist.  +++$+++ :I'm not hounding you. It's called communication. I am an administrator, but could happily ask someone else to try to discuss this with you. Edit summaries are a part of Wikipedia's editing conventions, a courtesy to editors with articles on their watchlist. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
264714 +++$+++ Sottolacqua +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264712 +++$+++ 264713 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.255571100E09 +++$+++ The edits I made following your second message on my talk page included edit summaries, which was then followed by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASottolacqua&action=historysubmit&diff=319842894&oldid=319838067 your message] accusing me of making it \"difficult\" for editors to see what changes I make. Would you prefer me to run the summary by you next time I make an edit to ensure the content meets your personal satisfaction based on the type of edit made?  +++$+++ ::The edits I made following your second message on my talk page included edit summaries, which was then followed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASottolacqua&action=historysubmit&diff=319842894&oldid=319838067 your message] accusing me of making it "difficult" for editors to see what changes I make. Would you prefer me to run the summary by you next time I make an edit to ensure the content meets your personal satisfaction based on the type of edit made? [[User:Sottolacqua|Sottolacqua]] ([[User talk:Sottolacqua|talk]]) 18:45, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
264715 +++$+++ Sottolacqua +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264712 +++$+++ 264714 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.255571460E09 +++$+++ Additionally, being an administrator I'm sure that you're aware that providing edit summaries is not a [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|policy or guideline]], as stated in the header of the [[Help:Edit summary|Edit Summary help article]].  +++$+++ :::Additionally, being an administrator I'm sure that you're aware that providing edit summaries is not a [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|policy or guideline]], as stated in the header of the [[Help:Edit summary|Edit Summary help article]]. [[User:Sottolacqua|Sottolacqua]] ([[User talk:Sottolacqua|talk]]) 18:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
264716 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264712 +++$+++ 264715 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.255571940E09 +++$+++ Do you have some sort or political problem with the summaries? They are so much a convention that they are used to judge candidates at [[WP:RFA]]. With respect, your comment about running every summary by me is rather silly. The reason I posted a second message was because you removed my first, without comment, and then proceeded to edit further without summaries.  +++$+++ ::::Do you have some sort or political problem with the summaries? They are so much a convention that they are used to judge candidates at [[WP:RFA]]. With respect, your comment about running every summary by me is rather silly. The reason I posted a second message was because you removed my first, without comment, and then proceeded to edit further without summaries. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
264717 +++$+++ Sottolacqua +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264712 +++$+++ 264716 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.255573260E09 +++$+++ Please see the [[User page#|Removal of comments, warnings]] section of the [[WP:User Page]] article which states \"Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages...Repeatedly restoring warnings does nothing but antagonize users...\" I'm free to remove whatever messages I want from my own talk page. As previously stated, after I removed your '''second''' message and began using an edit summary (which is again ''not'' required) you posted a '''third''' message on my talk page.  +++$+++ :::::Please see the [[User page#|Removal of comments, warnings]] section of the [[WP:User Page]] article which states "Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages...Repeatedly restoring warnings does nothing but antagonize users..." I'm free to remove whatever messages I want from my own talk page. As previously stated, after I removed your '''second''' message and began using an edit summary (which is again ''not'' required) you posted a '''third''' message on my talk page. [[User:Sottolacqua|Sottolacqua]] ([[User talk:Sottolacqua|talk]]) 19:21, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
264718 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264712 +++$+++ 264717 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.255573620E09 +++$+++ I'm losing interest in this. However, I am glad to see that you are learning to communicate.  +++$+++ ::::::I'm losing interest in this. However, I am glad to see that you are learning to communicate. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

2569 +++$+++ The Man in Question +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2569 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-08 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.262952720E09 +++$+++ If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! \u2014 <font face=\"gill sans\"> +++$+++ If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — <font face="gill sans">[[User:The Man in Question|the Man in Question]]</font> [[User_talk:The Man in Question|<small>(in question)</small>]] 04:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
2570 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2569 +++$+++ 2569 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.264338720E09 +++$+++ Ah, thanks for the info. The switch to templates was merely in response to suggestions made by the GA and FA reviews.  I did some research\/testing and was able to format the templates used to allow listing of coauthors in first name, last name order, while linked, just as in the web citations.  Regards,  +++$+++ : Ah, thanks for the info. The switch to templates was merely in response to suggestions made by the GA and FA reviews.  I did some research/testing and was able to format the templates used to allow listing of coauthors in first name, last name order, while linked, just as in the web citations.  Regards, [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 05:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

526858 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526858 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-28 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.193558220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the info, thats good to know.  I fixed the dates on the articvle you mentioned and I will remember that for the future so as I am going through them I will fix them.  On a separate note I have noticed that someone is adding a lot of pictures and it doesn't seem appropriate. Am I wrong in thinking this?-- +++$+++ Thanks for the info, thats good to know.  I fixed the dates on the articvle you mentioned and I will remember that for the future so as I am going through them I will fix them.  On a separate note I have noticed that someone is adding a lot of pictures and it doesn't seem appropriate. Am I wrong in thinking this?--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] 00:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
526859 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526858 +++$+++ 526858 +++$+++ 2007-10-28 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.193558940E09 +++$+++ You bet, [[John P. Fardy]] and the editor is Pen of bushido.-- +++$+++ :You bet, [[John P. Fardy]] and the editor is Pen of bushido.--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] 01:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

2572 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2572 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-03 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.270362900E09 +++$+++ Hello, I have been working on the article Vietnam Airlines for nearly two months and so I would like comments and feedbacks about my effort, could you please give it a look? Thank you in advance  +++$+++ Hello, I have been working on the article Vietnam Airlines for nearly two months and so I would like comments and feedbacks about my effort, could you please give it a look? Thank you in advance [[User:Sp33dyphil|Sp33dyphil]]  23:35, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
2573 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2572 +++$+++ 2572 +++$+++ 2010-04-05 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.270519980E09 +++$+++ I've responded on the GA review page and article page.  Regards,  +++$+++ :I've responded on the GA review page and article page.  Regards, [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 19:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

2574 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2574 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-08 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.273364580E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto|talk]]) 17:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
2575 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2574 +++$+++ 2574 +++$+++ 2010-05-08 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.273369020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the invitation and message! Having worked on the British Airways article history section and other areas, I'm pleased to see how the History article has improved. I'll give it a closer read as soon as I can and make comments. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks for the invitation and message! Having worked on the British Airways article history section and other areas, I'm pleased to see how the History article has improved. I'll give it a closer read as soon as I can and make comments. Regards, [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 18:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

264720 +++$+++ 79.79.93.120 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-25 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.256515260E09 +++$+++ ...let's discuss this like responsible adults. [[Special:Contributions\/79.79.93.120|79.79.93.120]] ( +++$+++ ...let's discuss this like responsible adults. [[Special:Contributions/79.79.93.120|79.79.93.120]] ([[User talk:79.79.93.120|talk]]) 17:01, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
264721 +++$+++ 79.71.50.68 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264720 +++$+++ 264720 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.256720400E09 +++$+++ Unhand thy lad! I beseech ye be seated yonder thus might we discusseth thine issue... [[Special:Contributions\/79.71.50.68|79.71.50.68]] ( +++$+++ :Unhand thy lad! I beseech ye be seated yonder thus might we discusseth thine issue... [[Special:Contributions/79.71.50.68|79.71.50.68]] ([[User talk:79.71.50.68|talk]]) 02:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

568408 +++$+++ WAvegetarian +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-09 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.149908520E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'm trying to feel out and understand the non-policy based boundaries surrounding inclusion and deletion better before  becoming an admin. Since all of the inclusion guidelines are subjective guidelines, I'm trying to get a good sense of what the prevailing views on them seem to be. It's also a [[WP:AUTO]] violation, btw, and ghits aren't going to serve the guy well. On another subject, is the \"I don't like CURRENTDAY.\" userbox a reference to a certain manic-depressive robot, or am I just reading too much into your userboxes?&mdash; +++$+++ Thanks, I'm trying to feel out and understand the non-policy based boundaries surrounding inclusion and deletion better before  becoming an admin. Since all of the inclusion guidelines are subjective guidelines, I'm trying to get a good sense of what the prevailing views on them seem to be. It's also a [[WP:AUTO]] violation, btw, and ghits aren't going to serve the guy well. On another subject, is the "I don't like CURRENTDAY." userbox a reference to a certain manic-depressive robot, or am I just reading too much into your userboxes?&mdash;[[User:WAvegetarian|WAvegetarian]]•[[User talk:WAvegetarian|(talk)]] 20:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
568409 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568408 +++$+++ 568408 +++$+++ 2006-06-09 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.149909060E09 +++$+++ OK, I understand now.  To get a feel for what is and isn't acceptable, you should also look at the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Log\/{{CURRENTYEAR}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}|AfD]] pages, if you don't already, and see how other editors and administrators express their opinions.  Editors have their own standards for inclusion or deletion in addition to the policies and guidelines set out elsewhere.  I always find that justifying an action based upon a reading of such policies and guidelines is the best course of action when my decisions are questioned, as you can see from my Talk page and archives. That way, debates don't descend in to the personal realm and it is that much easier to remain [[WP:CIVIL|civil]]. In answer to your other question, I don't know if Marvin was in the mind of the creator of that particular userbox, but there is a resonance with his attitudes and that statement, I agree!  <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :OK, I understand now.  To get a feel for what is and isn't acceptable, you should also look at the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/{{CURRENTYEAR}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}|AfD]] pages, if you don't already, and see how other editors and administrators express their opinions.  Editors have their own standards for inclusion or deletion in addition to the policies and guidelines set out elsewhere.  I always find that justifying an action based upon a reading of such policies and guidelines is the best course of action when my decisions are questioned, as you can see from my Talk page and archives. That way, debates don't descend in to the personal realm and it is that much easier to remain [[WP:CIVIL|civil]]. In answer to your other question, I don't know if Marvin was in the mind of the creator of that particular userbox, but there is a resonance with his attitudes and that statement, I agree!  <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 20:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

2578 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-19 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.276994100E09 +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice -->  +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 17:35, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
2579 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2578 +++$+++ 2578 +++$+++ 2010-07-10 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.278748200E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 00:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

2580 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2580 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-14 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.279137480E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Infobox_airline&diff=373353982&oldid=366748245 this edit]: please see [[User:MiszaBot\/Archive HowTo]], which states: <blockquote>The bot expects to see only one parameter per line. The closing <code><nowiki>}}<\/nowiki><\/code> must be on its own line. There must be no leading spaces before the pipes. If you drop out the newlines used in the above example, e.g. by wrapping the template invocation onto a single line, the bot may not do what you expect.<\/blockquote> As such, I've undone this edit.  +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Infobox_airline&diff=373353982&oldid=366748245 this edit]: please see [[User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo]], which states: <blockquote>The bot expects to see only one parameter per line. The closing <code><nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> must be on its own line. There must be no leading spaces before the pipes. If you drop out the newlines used in the above example, e.g. by wrapping the template invocation onto a single line, the bot may not do what you expect.</blockquote> As such, I've undone this edit. [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 12:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
2581 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2580 +++$+++ 2580 +++$+++ 2010-07-14 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.279154100E09 +++$+++ Ah, thx for the info!  +++$+++ :Ah, thx for the info! [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 17:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
2582 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2580 +++$+++ 2580 +++$+++ 2010-11-25 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.290674340E09 +++$+++ Thx.  +++$+++ :Thx. [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 00:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

264725 +++$+++ 92.20.196.215 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264725 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-16 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.258417680E09 +++$+++ Seriously what are you on! Disrespectful??? Hard not to be when morons on this site re-edit thing to sound soooooooo shite when you try your best to imporve them - and when you do, sap someone comes along and ruins it all!!!  [[Special:Contributions\/92.20.196.215|92.20.196.215]] ( +++$+++ Seriously what are you on! Disrespectful??? Hard not to be when morons on this site re-edit thing to sound soooooooo shite when you try your best to imporve them - and when you do, sap someone comes along and ruins it all!!!  [[Special:Contributions/92.20.196.215|92.20.196.215]] ([[User talk:92.20.196.215|talk]]) 16:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
264726 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264725 +++$+++ 264725 +++$+++ 2009-11-16 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.258417740E09 +++$+++ This is exactly what I'm talking about. Please re-read my message about civility, and [[WP:MOS]].  +++$+++ :This is exactly what I'm talking about. Please re-read my message about civility, and [[WP:MOS]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:29, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

2583 +++$+++ Fnlayson +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-18 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.295337660E09 +++$+++ Hey SynergyStar!  Hope you are doing well in early 2011.  If you have time and the interest, could you help with improvements on the [[Boeing 767]] article.  The article is undergoing a [[WP:Peer review\/Boeing 767\/archive1|peer review]] now and we're trying to make changes and fix things.  If you can't help or something, that's fine too.  Take care. - +++$+++ Hey SynergyStar!  Hope you are doing well in early 2011.  If you have time and the interest, could you help with improvements on the [[Boeing 767]] article.  The article is undergoing a [[WP:Peer review/Boeing 767/archive1|peer review]] now and we're trying to make changes and fix things.  If you can't help or something, that's fine too.  Take care. -[[User:Fnlayson|fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 00:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
2584 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2583 +++$+++ 2583 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.295495820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the well wishes!!! Very kind invitation, I'll try to pitch in when I can.  Best,  +++$+++ :Thanks for the well wishes!!! Very kind invitation, I'll try to pitch in when I can.  Best, [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 19:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
2585 +++$+++ Fnlayson +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2583 +++$+++ 2584 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.295520360E09 +++$+++ Appreciate what you're doing.  Earlier today, I started editing in between your edits and saw repeated images and removed a couple.  I tried to go back and fix. I'll try to stay out of the way while you are doing edits.  I'll try to add reference to the accident entries that need it. That seems to be the last area needing references. - +++$+++ :: Appreciate what you're doing.  Earlier today, I started editing in between your edits and saw repeated images and removed a couple.  I tried to go back and fix. I'll try to stay out of the way while you are doing edits.  I'll try to add reference to the accident entries that need it. That seems to be the last area needing references. -[[User:Fnlayson|fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 02:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
2586 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2583 +++$+++ 2585 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 06:16:00 +++$+++ 1.295532960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your encouragement and support!!! I've given the article some polishing, keeping in mind the peer review's comments on photo variety, plus using the FA examples.  Looking better; after the refs are aligned for format and consistency, and the hull loss list condensed or split, the article may be ready for GAR.  +++$+++ :::Thanks for your encouragement and support!!! I've given the article some polishing, keeping in mind the peer review's comments on photo variety, plus using the FA examples.  Looking better; after the refs are aligned for format and consistency, and the hull loss list condensed or split, the article may be ready for GAR. [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 06:16, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
2587 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2583 +++$+++ 2584 +++$+++ 2011-01-21 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.295600160E09 +++$+++ Great thanks for the cleanup that you did. I've done some reference formatting myself. I hope we can give this article a GA-status in two\/three days. Any suggestions of what I should do to further improve it?  +++$+++ ::Great thanks for the cleanup that you did. I've done some reference formatting myself. I hope we can give this article a GA-status in two/three days. Any suggestions of what I should do to further improve it? [[User:Sp33dyphil|<big>'''<span style="background:SaddleBrown;color:Gold">'''Sp33dyphil</span></big>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Talk]])</sup> <sup>([[Special:contributions/Sp33dyphil|Contributions]])</sup><sup>(I love Wikipedia!)</sup> 00:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
2588 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2583 +++$+++ 2587 +++$+++ 2011-01-21 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.295605380E09 +++$+++ Thanks to you too for all your efforts to improve the article!!! I'm making suggestions on the talk page. Regards  +++$+++ :::Thanks to you too for all your efforts to improve the article!!! I'm making suggestions on the talk page. Regards [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 02:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

526873 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.194466740E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 12:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
526874 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526873 +++$+++ 526873 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.194519780E09 +++$+++ Rationale added. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Rationale added. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 03:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

264732 +++$+++ Neutralhomer +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264732 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-07 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.260228780E09 +++$+++ It would be a little easier to add that \"critical commentary\" than to just outright delete the images from the page.  Try moving them to \"thumbs\" and adding some information, it keeps the image and adds information to the page. -  +++$+++ It would be a little easier to add that "critical commentary" than to just outright delete the images from the page.  Try moving them to "thumbs" and adding some information, it keeps the image and adds information to the page. - [[User:Neutralhomer|Neutralhomer]] ([[User talk:Neutralhomer|talk]]) 15:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
264733 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264732 +++$+++ 264732 +++$+++ 2009-12-07 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.260228840E09 +++$+++ No it would not. With respect, I don't think you appreciate what 'critical commentary' is, and how long it takes to research and write properly.  +++$+++ :No it would not. With respect, I don't think you appreciate what 'critical commentary' is, and how long it takes to research and write properly. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
264734 +++$+++ Neutralhomer +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264732 +++$+++ 264733 +++$+++ 2009-12-07 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.260228960E09 +++$+++ If you would have waited for a moment, you would have seen I was reverting to add the \"critical commentary\".  Reverting makes things easier.  Also, don't threaten. -  +++$+++ ::If you would have waited for a moment, you would have seen I was reverting to add the "critical commentary".  Reverting makes things easier.  Also, don't threaten. - [[User:Neutralhomer|Neutralhomer]] ([[User talk:Neutralhomer|talk]]) 15:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
264735 +++$+++ Milonica +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264732 +++$+++ 264734 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.260268440E09 +++$+++ Sorry to bust in but a lot of articles I have edited showed up in my watchlist removing logos. Is there a reason behind deleting these or a precedent? If not, deleting them for no particular reason sounds fishy to me. -- +++$+++ :::Sorry to bust in but a lot of articles I have edited showed up in my watchlist removing logos. Is there a reason behind deleting these or a precedent? If not, deleting them for no particular reason sounds fishy to me. --[[User:Milonica|milonica]] ([[User talk:Milonica|talk]]) 02:34, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
264736 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264732 +++$+++ 264734 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.260344640E09 +++$+++ Critical commentary can be a few things. For instance, it could be a discussion of how a logo fits in with the parent company's branding; the design of the logo, etc. Vitally, there should be references to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Note, it is insufficient to merely describe the image. I suggest that you read some of the peer reviews at [[WP:GAC]] and [[WP:FAC]] to become more proficient with our standards.  +++$+++ :::Critical commentary can be a few things. For instance, it could be a discussion of how a logo fits in with the parent company's branding; the design of the logo, etc. Vitally, there should be references to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Note, it is insufficient to merely describe the image. I suggest that you read some of the peer reviews at [[WP:GAC]] and [[WP:FAC]] to become more proficient with our standards. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
264737 +++$+++ Milonica +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264732 +++$+++ 264733 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.260268860E09 +++$+++ Not to mention, I like seeing old logos and have a fond interest in radio. What is wrong with keeping them? When all of the sudden did it become bad policy to have more information\/pictures on Wikipedia? -- +++$+++ ::Not to mention, I like seeing old logos and have a fond interest in radio. What is wrong with keeping them? When all of the sudden did it become bad policy to have more information/pictures on Wikipedia? --[[User:Milonica|milonica]] ([[User talk:Milonica|talk]]) 02:41, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

2589 +++$+++ Fnlayson +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-09 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.297243920E09 +++$+++ Hey the 767 received GA yesterday. :) Thanks for the hard work referencing, adding details and so forth.  - +++$+++ Hey the 767 received GA yesterday. :) Thanks for the hard work referencing, adding details and so forth.  -[[User:Fnlayson|Fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 01:32, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
2590 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2589 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.297245900E09 +++$+++ Excellent news!  Glad to help. Thanks to you as well for helping reach GA status. It's great to see the project increase its share of higher quality articles.  +++$+++ ::Excellent news!  Glad to help. Thanks to you as well for helping reach GA status. It's great to see the project increase its share of higher quality articles. [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 02:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
2591 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2589 +++$+++ 2589 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.296015720E09 +++$+++ Wow, thank you for this wonderful honor, I am really touched.  Thank you and glad to help!!! Best regards,  +++$+++ :Wow, thank you for this wonderful honor, I am really touched.  Thank you and glad to help!!! Best regards, [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 20:22, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
2592 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2589 +++$+++ 2591 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.296020160E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. You truly deserve the honour and I'm happy to present it to you.  +++$+++ ::You're welcome. You truly deserve the honour and I'm happy to present it to you. [[User:Sp33dyphil|<big>'''<span style="background:SaddleBrown;color:Gold">'''Sp33dyphil</span></big>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Talk]])</sup> <sup>([[Special:contributions/Sp33dyphil|Contributions]])</sup><sup>(I love Wikipedia!)</sup> 21:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

526880 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526880 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-18 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.195396620E09 +++$+++ Just came across this...[[Ruth Cheney Streeter]]. Thought you might enjoy a bio project.  Hope all is well.-- +++$+++ Just came across this...[[Ruth Cheney Streeter]]. Thought you might enjoy a bio project.  Hope all is well.--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] ([[User talk:Looper5920|talk]]) 06:37, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
526881 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526880 +++$+++ 526880 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.195677240E09 +++$+++ Just came across a few more you may be interested in in taking a look at ... [[John R. Dailey]], [[Francis P. Bottorff]] and [[Douglas M. Stone (general)|Douglas M. Stone]] -- +++$+++ : Just came across a few more you may be interested in in taking a look at ... [[John R. Dailey]], [[Francis P. Bottorff]] and [[Douglas M. Stone (general)|Douglas M. Stone]] --[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] ([[User talk:Looper5920|talk]]) 12:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

2593 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-01 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.296568920E09 +++$+++ I've done a lot of expansion to [[Airbus A330]]. I now need someone to help me polish it for [[WP:FAC]], so I though you might interested.  +++$+++ I've done a lot of expansion to [[Airbus A330]]. I now need someone to help me polish it for [[WP:FAC]], so I though you might interested. [[User:Sp33dyphil|<big>'''<span style="background:SaddleBrown;color:Gold">'''Sp33dyphil</span></big>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Talk]])</sup> <sup>([[Special:contributions/Sp33dyphil|Contributions]])</sup><sup>(I love Wikipedia!)</sup> 06:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
2594 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2593 +++$+++ 2593 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.296579900E09 +++$+++ I'll try to chip in where I can.  Regards,  +++$+++ :I'll try to chip in where I can.  Regards, [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 09:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
2595 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2593 +++$+++ 2593 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.296707220E09 +++$+++ In my experience there are many article reviews where the use of templates is suggested, but it's not always agreed on, and it seems to me that the main point is consistency throughout the article, of whatever system is being used.   +++$+++ :In my experience there are many article reviews where the use of templates is suggested, but it's not always agreed on, and it seems to me that the main point is consistency throughout the article, of whatever system is being used.  [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 20:27, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
2596 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2593 +++$+++ 2593 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.299163320E09 +++$+++ Do you mind popping into the article to see anything's wrong with it; it's close to the FA-status. Also, I can't seem to figure out an alt text for the carbon brake picture. Thanks  +++$+++ :Do you mind popping into the article to see anything's wrong with it; it's close to the FA-status. Also, I can't seem to figure out an alt text for the carbon brake picture. Thanks [[User:Sp33dyphil|<big>'''<span style="background:SaddleBrown;color:Gold">'''Sp33dyphil</span></big>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Sp33dyphil|T]] • [[Special:contributions/Sp33dyphil|C]] • I love Wikipedia!)</sup>  06:42, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
2597 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2593 +++$+++ 2596 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.299560160E09 +++$+++ Please excuse the delayed reply, I have been very busy.  Checked out the alt text for the carbon brake and it seems to be added, usually it's just a description of the picture itself, no need to repeat the caption portion (reason why carbon brakes are favoured). Regards  +++$+++ ::Please excuse the delayed reply, I have been very busy.  Checked out the alt text for the carbon brake and it seems to be added, usually it's just a description of the picture itself, no need to repeat the caption portion (reason why carbon brakes are favoured). Regards [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 20:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

264738 +++$+++ Powergate92 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264738 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-08 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.260337320E09 +++$+++ Also some of the logos you and Neutralhomer are edit warring over ([[:File:Wgh-am.png]] and [[:File:WBQK-FM.png]]) are [[WP:Public domain#Fonts|Public domain]] as they are in [[typeface]], so they don't go by the [[WP:Non-free content criteria]] as they are free logos.  +++$+++ Also some of the logos you and Neutralhomer are edit warring over ([[:File:Wgh-am.png]] and [[:File:WBQK-FM.png]]) are [[WP:Public domain#Fonts|Public domain]] as they are in [[typeface]], so they don't go by the [[WP:Non-free content criteria]] as they are free logos. [[User:Powergate92|<font style="color:#fff;background:green;">Powergate92</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Powergate92|<font style="color:#fff;background:green;">Talk</font>]]</small> 21:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
264739 +++$+++ RadioFan +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264738 +++$+++ 264738 +++$+++ 2009-12-13 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.260752220E09 +++$+++ This discussion seems to be at an impasse as JPS continues to remove historic logos as they are added back. This coupled with the protection of pages involved by an administrator involved in this dispute make it necessary for a fresh point of view to assist in resolving the issue.  I've opened [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal\/Cases\/2009-12-13\/KOTK]].-- +++$+++ :This discussion seems to be at an impasse as JPS continues to remove historic logos as they are added back. This coupled with the protection of pages involved by an administrator involved in this dispute make it necessary for a fresh point of view to assist in resolving the issue.  I've opened [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-12-13/KOTK]].--[[User:RadioFan|RadioFan]] ([[User talk:RadioFan|talk]]) 16:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
264740 +++$+++ Aqwis +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264738 +++$+++ 264739 +++$+++ 2009-12-13 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.260753540E09 +++$+++ RadioFan, I don't feel I am involved in this dispute. I unprotected [[WFFT-TV]] because The JPS protected the page while being involved in a conflict on the same page, a blatant conflict of interest, and not necessarily because I disagreed that the images should be removed. -- +++$+++ ::RadioFan, I don't feel I am involved in this dispute. I unprotected [[WFFT-TV]] because The JPS protected the page while being involved in a conflict on the same page, a blatant conflict of interest, and not necessarily because I disagreed that the images should be removed. --[[User:Aqwis|Aqwis]] ([[User talk:Aqwis|talk]]) 17:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
264741 +++$+++ RadioFan +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264738 +++$+++ 264740 +++$+++ 2009-12-13 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.260755100E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, I'll remove you as an involved editor but would like to retain mention of the page protection incident if you dont have any objection.-- +++$+++ :::Fair enough, I'll remove you as an involved editor but would like to retain mention of the page protection incident if you dont have any objection.--[[User:RadioFan|RadioFan]] ([[User talk:RadioFan|talk]]) 17:45, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
264742 +++$+++ Aqwis +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264738 +++$+++ 264741 +++$+++ 2009-12-13 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.260758580E09 +++$+++ Feel free. -- +++$+++ ::::Feel free. --[[User:Aqwis|Aqwis]] ([[User talk:Aqwis|talk]]) 18:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

2598 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2598 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-02 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.296638580E09 +++$+++ |style=\"border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I feel really honoured to present you this special Barnstar for your outstanding work in automobile- and aviation-related articles. You are really an inspiration :)  +++$+++ |style="border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I feel really honoured to present you this special Barnstar for your outstanding work in automobile- and aviation-related articles. You are really an inspiration :) [[User:Sp33dyphil|<big>'''<span style="background:SaddleBrown;color:Gold">'''Sp33dyphil</span></big>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Sp33dyphil|T]] • [[Special:contributions/Sp33dyphil|C]] • I love Wikipedia!)</sup>  01:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
2599 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2598 +++$+++ 2598 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.296706740E09 +++$+++ Wow, thank you again!!!  May I give you a compliment as well, your work on aviation articles is great too and I wish you success in your nomination efforts.  +++$+++ :Wow, thank you again!!!  May I give you a compliment as well, your work on aviation articles is great too and I wish you success in your nomination efforts. [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 20:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
2600 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2598 +++$+++ 2599 +++$+++ 2011-02-03 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.296742200E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. You deserve it.  +++$+++ ::You are very welcome. You deserve it. [[User:Sp33dyphil|<big>'''<span style="background:SaddleBrown;color:Gold">'''Sp33dyphil</span></big>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Sp33dyphil|T]] • [[Special:contributions/Sp33dyphil|C]] • I love Wikipedia!)</sup>  06:10, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

499315 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-20 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.164019320E09 +++$+++ Well, I... no, I was going to defend myself there, but then I realised that it was pointless. I was just feeling mean ;) <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ Well, I... no, I was going to defend myself there, but then I realised that it was pointless. I was just feeling mean ;) <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 02:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
499316 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499315 +++$+++ 499315 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.164048060E09 +++$+++ Okie dokes, I'm just trying to fix something on the chem portal, and then I'll scoot over there. *breathless with anticipation* <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :Okie dokes, I'm just trying to fix something on the chem portal, and then I'll scoot over there. *breathless with anticipation* <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 10:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
499317 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499315 +++$+++ 499316 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.164050280E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AEditor_review%2FDaveydweeb_2&diff=88991726&oldid=88987455 Reviewed ya]. Lemme know watchufink. <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AEditor_review%2FDaveydweeb_2&diff=88991726&oldid=88987455 Reviewed ya]. Lemme know watchufink. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 11:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
499318 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499315 +++$+++ 499317 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.164052920E09 +++$+++ Well, if you need to find the deletionist cabal, they've been active around anything with the words \"miscellany for deletion\" and \"Esperanza\" in them... tsk tsk, I'm biased. But some things are for the better. <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :::Well, if you need to find the deletionist cabal, they've been active around anything with the words "miscellany for deletion" and "Esperanza" in them... tsk tsk, I'm biased. But some things are for the better. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 12:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
499319 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499315 +++$+++ 499318 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.164053220E09 +++$+++ Oh, but don't you know? They're sneaky buggers... one minute they're at MfD... the next they're at AfD... and everyone in a while, they rear their ugly heads at TfD and CfD... it gives me the heeby jeebies. Hey, when you get a spare minute, take a look at [[Portal:Chemistry]]. I've been giving it a facelift over the past week or so :) <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::::Oh, but don't you know? They're sneaky buggers... one minute they're at MfD... the next they're at AfD... and everyone in a while, they rear their ugly heads at TfD and CfD... it gives me the heeby jeebies. Hey, when you get a spare minute, take a look at [[Portal:Chemistry]]. I've been giving it a facelift over the past week or so :) <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 12:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
499320 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499315 +++$+++ 499319 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.164053760E09 +++$+++ Heh, green on grey is still better than what was there before, it was a kind of black on salmon. Rather boring. So you don't like green on grey, eh? What do you recommend? <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :::::Heh, green on grey is still better than what was there before, it was a kind of black on salmon. Rather boring. So you don't like green on grey, eh? What do you recommend? <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 12:16, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
499321 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499315 +++$+++ 499320 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.164054120E09 +++$+++ Wang, you need to hang around the Village Pump more often, if you haven't heard of [[WP:AES|automatic edit summaries]] ;) Don't worry, it's really new, they've only been using them for the past 3-4 days. <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::::::Wang, you need to hang around the Village Pump more often, if you haven't heard of [[WP:AES|automatic edit summaries]] ;) Don't worry, it's really new, they've only been using them for the past 3-4 days. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 12:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

264744 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264744 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-06 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.262821920E09 +++$+++ Hello, I see that you are the primary editor for [[Psycho (1960 film)]].  I am interested in giving it the Featured Article treatment in time for the film's 50th anniversary on June 16, 2010.  I have a sandbox here: [[User:Erik\/Psycho (1960 film)]].  It appears that you've given the article a great start.  As you can see in my sandbox, there are additional publications about ''Psycho'', and I would like to explore these.  What do you think about a referencing system like at [[American Beauty (film)#References]] (where the author\/year links to the full resource)?  Or including a video clip of the shower scene in ''Psycho'' like there is a clip at [[American Beauty (film)#Music & temporality]]?  If you are interested in this project, we should talk more on the film article's talk page.  +++$+++ Hello, I see that you are the primary editor for [[Psycho (1960 film)]].  I am interested in giving it the Featured Article treatment in time for the film's 50th anniversary on June 16, 2010.  I have a sandbox here: [[User:Erik/Psycho (1960 film)]].  It appears that you've given the article a great start.  As you can see in my sandbox, there are additional publications about ''Psycho'', and I would like to explore these.  What do you think about a referencing system like at [[American Beauty (film)#References]] (where the author/year links to the full resource)?  Or including a video clip of the shower scene in ''Psycho'' like there is a clip at [[American Beauty (film)#Music & temporality]]?  If you are interested in this project, we should talk more on the film article's talk page. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]]) 15:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
264745 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264744 +++$+++ 264744 +++$+++ 2010-01-08 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.262985360E09 +++$+++ Hi! I'm probably the primary editor statistically, but I don't consider myself to be the primary author. I've done a lot of leg work on this over the years (formatting, restoring references, reverting vandalism, etc.). I'll keep an eye on it and help out when I can, but I can't commit to anything just yet. I think I've exhausted my patience with the references on this, so if you would like to change the format, feel free... :) I've always thought that the academic side of the film of film should be considered more...  +++$+++ :Hi! I'm probably the primary editor statistically, but I don't consider myself to be the primary author. I've done a lot of leg work on this over the years (formatting, restoring references, reverting vandalism, etc.). I'll keep an eye on it and help out when I can, but I can't commit to anything just yet. I think I've exhausted my patience with the references on this, so if you would like to change the format, feel free... :) I've always thought that the academic side of the film of film should be considered more... [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

2601 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-09 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.297246380E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for the Wikiwings award you presented to me. Good luck on whatever you are working on [[File:Face-grin.svg|25px]]  +++$+++ Many thanks for the Wikiwings award you presented to me. Good luck on whatever you are working on [[File:Face-grin.svg|25px]] [[User:Sp33dyphil|<big>'''<span style="background:SaddleBrown;color:Gold">'''Sp33dyphil</span></big>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Sp33dyphil|T]] • [[Special:contributions/Sp33dyphil|C]] • I love Wikipedia!)</sup>  02:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
2602 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2601 +++$+++ 2601 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.297246500E09 +++$+++ You're truly welcome, and congrats again on the successful GA nomination.  +++$+++ :You're truly welcome, and congrats again on the successful GA nomination. [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 02:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

264746 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-29 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.264798260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Coupling_(UK_TV_series)&curid=178892&diff=340582532&oldid=338656021 edit] to Coupling. Unfortunately, the IMDb is not considered by Wikipedia to be reliable as it relies on user-submitted content. Also, YouTube cannot usually be used as a reference because of copyright issues. Can you provide a more authoritative reference?  +++$+++ Thanks for your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coupling_(UK_TV_series)&curid=178892&diff=340582532&oldid=338656021 edit] to Coupling. Unfortunately, the IMDb is not considered by Wikipedia to be reliable as it relies on user-submitted content. Also, YouTube cannot usually be used as a reference because of copyright issues. Can you provide a more authoritative reference? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
264747 +++$+++ Moyogo +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264746 +++$+++ 264746 +++$+++ 2010-01-29 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.264802640E09 +++$+++ OK. After some digging, besides finding some Greek episodes online, I found [http:\/\/www.ethnos.gr\/article.asp?catid=11416&subid=2&tag=8448&pubid=149203], [http:\/\/www.sport24.gr\/media.asp?month=11&year=2007] and [http:\/\/archive.enet.gr\/online\/online_text\/c=113,dt=09.11.2007,id=80265656]. But are those authoritative enough for you? -- +++$+++ :OK. After some digging, besides finding some Greek episodes online, I found [http://www.ethnos.gr/article.asp?catid=11416&subid=2&tag=8448&pubid=149203], [http://www.sport24.gr/media.asp?month=11&year=2007] and [http://archive.enet.gr/online/online_text/c=113,dt=09.11.2007,id=80265656]. But are those authoritative enough for you? --[[User:Moyogo|Mᴏʏᴏɢᴏ]]/ [[User talk:Moyogo|⁽ᵗᵃˡᵏ⁾]] 14:04, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
264748 +++$+++ Moyogo +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264746 +++$+++ 264746 +++$+++ 2010-01-29 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.264805280E09 +++$+++ Ethnos' article [http:\/\/www.ethnos.gr\/article.asp?catid=11416&subid=2&tag=8448&pubid=149203] seems to be a [[List of newspapers in Greece|reliable source]]. -- +++$+++ :Ethnos' article [http://www.ethnos.gr/article.asp?catid=11416&subid=2&tag=8448&pubid=149203] seems to be a [[List of newspapers in Greece|reliable source]]. --[[User:Moyogo|Mᴏʏᴏɢᴏ]]/ [[User talk:Moyogo|⁽ᵗᵃˡᵏ⁾]] 14:48, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
264749 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264746 +++$+++ 264748 +++$+++ 2010-01-29 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.264812900E09 +++$+++ Excellent, thank you.  +++$+++ ::Excellent, thank you. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:55, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

2603 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2603 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-08 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.304870700E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray; color: black\" | For your work on finding replacements for dead references on [[Boeing 777]], I hereby award you the Citation Barnstar. You thoroughly deserve it \u2013 keep up your fantastic work! --[[User:Sp33dyphil|<big>'''<span style=\"background:DeepPink;color:White\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/big>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ready]] \u2022 [[Special:contributions\/Sp33dyphil|to]] \u2022  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray; color: black" | For your work on finding replacements for dead references on [[Boeing 777]], I hereby award you the Citation Barnstar. You thoroughly deserve it – keep up your fantastic work! --[[User:Sp33dyphil|<big>'''<span style="background:DeepPink;color:White">'''Sp33dyphil</span></big>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ready]] • [[Special:contributions/Sp33dyphil|to]] • [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|Rumble]]</sup>  09:05, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
2604 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2603 +++$+++ 2603 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.305260820E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your kind acknowledgment!!  +++$+++ :Thank you for your kind acknowledgment!! [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 21:27, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

2605 +++$+++ TCO +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2605 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-27 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.309230300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 20:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
2606 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2605 +++$+++ 2605 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.309269060E09 +++$+++ Glad to help, even though I'm rather swamped at the moment I thought that the article could benefit from those suggestions.  The panorama picture is very nice, detailed and rich, I'd be tempted to keep it except maybe on a factory or city article. Other images are up to the editor(s)...thanks for all your hard work improving the article! Best regards,  +++$+++ :Glad to help, even though I'm rather swamped at the moment I thought that the article could benefit from those suggestions.  The panorama picture is very nice, detailed and rich, I'd be tempted to keep it except maybe on a factory or city article. Other images are up to the editor(s)...thanks for all your hard work improving the article! Best regards, [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 06:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

2607 +++$+++ TCO +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2607 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.309326660E09 +++$+++ Again...really starting to look sharp.  I've read the other plane FAs and think this one would be a good addition to the fleet! +++$+++ Again...really starting to look sharp.  I've read the other plane FAs and think this one would be a good addition to the fleet![[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 22:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
2608 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2607 +++$+++ 2607 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.309589880E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your diligence.  It's a a unique challenge to make an aviation article accessible to the general public. \xa0I agree that the narrative could be made clearer and a diagram sounds like a great idea. \xa0The review process for this article has now taken over one month which is rather long from past experience. \xa0Sometimes I feel that before the nomination is listed, particularly after recent failures, there can be a more thorough preparation. \xa0Otherwise it can seem somewhat rough and there isn't enough time to polish the article. \xa0However a lot of progress often occurs with these types of reviews. I still think that given that the past reviews were only a month or two ago some reviewers may be jaded by seeing the nomination be submitted again so soon. Still everyone is trying to make the best judgment. Best  +++$+++ : Thanks again for your diligence.  It's a a unique challenge to make an aviation article accessible to the general public.  I agree that the narrative could be made clearer and a diagram sounds like a great idea.  The review process for this article has now taken over one month which is rather long from past experience.  Sometimes I feel that before the nomination is listed, particularly after recent failures, there can be a more thorough preparation.  Otherwise it can seem somewhat rough and there isn't enough time to polish the article.  However a lot of progress often occurs with these types of reviews. I still think that given that the past reviews were only a month or two ago some reviewers may be jaded by seeing the nomination be submitted again so soon. Still everyone is trying to make the best judgment. Best [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 23:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
2609 +++$+++ TCO +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2607 +++$+++ 2608 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.309591680E09 +++$+++ I couldn't get Tony, Wehwalt, Malleus, or Mike (prose superstars) to proof it.  So I am going over it again.  Actually, am finding a lot of Sandy's complaints and am fixing them.  Should be a lot of rivets sanded down when I get done.  I did make the diagram as well.  (Of course now I understand the danged plane also...I am \"general public\"...but after messing with it, ya learn.)  Did not realize that the thing had been up a month ago. +++$+++ ::I couldn't get Tony, Wehwalt, Malleus, or Mike (prose superstars) to proof it.  So I am going over it again.  Actually, am finding a lot of Sandy's complaints and am fixing them.  Should be a lot of rivets sanded down when I get done.  I did make the diagram as well.  (Of course now I understand the danged plane also...I am "general public"...but after messing with it, ya learn.)  Did not realize that the thing had been up a month ago.[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 00:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

2610 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2610 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.311493200E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | That edit that you made on [[Boeing 757]] was terrific, adding so much information in one go.  I salute you, keep up your good work. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | That edit that you made on [[Boeing 757]] was terrific, adding so much information in one go.  I salute you, keep up your good work. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 00:40, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
2611 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2610 +++$+++ 2610 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311494880E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the warm message!  +++$+++ :Thank you for the warm message! [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 01:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

526899 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526899 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-03 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.196668860E09 +++$+++ I've been thinking about reorganizing the various lists of USMC units, and wanted your input on the matter (since you are heavily involved in USMC articles). I spell out my idea [[User_talk:Looper5920#List_of_United_States_Marine_Corps_battalions|here]], but here is the gist: I think it would be best to group units together by which component of the MAGTF they fulfill: Ground combat, Aviation, Combat Service Support, Other, and Inactive. This makes five very comprehensive lists, in hierarchical order, and much easier for a civillians to see and understand teh organization of the Corps, as well as make it easy for a Marine to find a specific unit. ''' +++$+++ I've been thinking about reorganizing the various lists of USMC units, and wanted your input on the matter (since you are heavily involved in USMC articles). I spell out my idea [[User_talk:Looper5920#List_of_United_States_Marine_Corps_battalions|here]], but here is the gist: I think it would be best to group units together by which component of the MAGTF they fulfill: Ground combat, Aviation, Combat Service Support, Other, and Inactive. This makes five very comprehensive lists, in hierarchical order, and much easier for a civillians to see and understand teh organization of the Corps, as well as make it easy for a Marine to find a specific unit. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]] 00:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
526900 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526899 +++$+++ 526899 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.196845860E09 +++$+++ I see that you have asked [[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] about this.  I defer to his thoughts -- as he has put a huge effort into unit articles, whereas, I've been working the biography side.  &mdash;  +++$+++ : I see that you have asked [[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] about this.  I defer to his thoughts -- as he has put a huge effort into unit articles, whereas, I've been working the biography side.  &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 01:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

2612 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2612 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312185720E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | You did it again! Thanks to your work on [[Boeing 767]]. I'm astounded by your massive additions of text, some of which you added in one go. Wow After looking at your work, I'm got quite excited about the prospects of a readable and high-quality encyclopedia. I hope you're planning to promote the article to FA status, because I think your effort is really worthy of the Star. To spread the Wikilove, like what I'm doing now, please award someone who is worthy of one a barnstar. Thanks a lot. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | You did it again! Thanks to your work on [[Boeing 767]]. I'm astounded by your massive additions of text, some of which you added in one go. Wow After looking at your work, I'm got quite excited about the prospects of a readable and high-quality encyclopedia. I hope you're planning to promote the article to FA status, because I think your effort is really worthy of the Star. To spread the Wikilove, like what I'm doing now, please award someone who is worthy of one a barnstar. Thanks a lot. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 01:02, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
2613 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ 2612 +++$+++ 2612 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312609800E09 +++$+++ Thanks again, I'm humbled by your honor.  +++$+++ :Thanks again, I'm humbled by your honor. [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar#top|talk]]) 22:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

44126 +++$+++ 1965Tim +++$+++ Twsx +++$+++ 44126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-15 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.263595200E09 +++$+++ I don't think you meant to post to my talk page and revert my sandbox. -  +++$+++ I don't think you meant to post to my talk page and revert my sandbox. - [[User:1965Tim|1965Tim]] ([[User talk:1965Tim|talk]]) 14:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
44127 +++$+++ Twsx +++$+++ Twsx +++$+++ 44126 +++$+++ 44126 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.263595380E09 +++$+++ Definitely not. Apparently I either miss-clicked or didn't pay attention. My apologies. ~&nbsp;<span style=\"color:#FF0000;font-weight:bold;\">|&nbsp;<small> +++$+++ :Definitely not. Apparently I either miss-clicked or didn't pay attention. My apologies. ~&nbsp;<span style="color:#FF0000;font-weight:bold;">|&nbsp;<small>[[User:Twsx|twsx]]</small>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Twsx|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Twsx|cont]]</sub></small>&nbsp;|</span>&nbsp;~ 14:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

2614 +++$+++ Eelamstylez77 +++$+++ Secondarywaltz +++$+++ 2614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311079560E09 +++$+++ I see you've replaced the logo at [[Toronto subway and RT]] with the regular TTC logo. The TTC logo with 'subway' written in capitals underneath in the [[Toronto Subway Font]] is now the signage at subway station entrances, replacing the previous signage which had the TTC logo with 'subway' written within it. The new one can be found on most modernized subway stations. Why did you replace it with the plain TTC logo?  +++$+++ I see you've replaced the logo at [[Toronto subway and RT]] with the regular TTC logo. The TTC logo with 'subway' written in capitals underneath in the [[Toronto Subway Font]] is now the signage at subway station entrances, replacing the previous signage which had the TTC logo with 'subway' written within it. The new one can be found on most modernized subway stations. Why did you replace it with the plain TTC logo? [[User:Eelamstylez77|EelamStyleZ]] ([[User talk:Eelamstylez77|talk]]) 05:46, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
2615 +++$+++ Secondarywaltz +++$+++ Secondarywaltz +++$+++ 2614 +++$+++ 2614 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311120000E09 +++$+++ There is only one TTC logo. Any additiional text that might be added for a particular purpose is totally irrelevant. What you are referring to is signage and the addional word \"SUBWAY\" is purely informative, just as the station name and icons like [[File:Handicapped.svg|18px]] and [[File:BSicon SUBWAY.svg|18px]] may also be displayed on those same signs to give the public information about the facility.  +++$+++ :There is only one TTC logo. Any additiional text that might be added for a particular purpose is totally irrelevant. What you are referring to is signage and the addional word "SUBWAY" is purely informative, just as the station name and icons like [[File:Handicapped.svg|18px]] and [[File:BSicon SUBWAY.svg|18px]] may also be displayed on those same signs to give the public information about the facility. [[User:Secondarywaltz|Secondarywaltz]] ([[User talk:Secondarywaltz#top|talk]]) 17:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

264762 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264762 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-17 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.271492520E09 +++$+++ Just looking over the article, it looks pretty good. I would probably just get a copy edit done from someone you know does good copy editing. A few things caught my eye. First, I would probably call ''JAWS'' a franchise. It has video games, Universal rides, multiple films, and an iconic figure (the shark). The fact that it has games and rides that are extensions of the original film, and not simply adaptations of said film, I'd say you are probably more [[Jaws (franchise)]] than [[Jaws (film series)]]. Second, I think you go into too much detail about what the first film has spawned in that first lead paragraph. I think the first paragraph should focus--although a brief mentioning of other items--what the franchise is based on. It's based on a film (yes, the film and not the book, because it if wasn't for the film no one would even know what the book was) from 1975. Give a little more detail about the film series there. For instance, the films are more than just a shark attacking a particular area, but really how one family (The Brodys) are basically haunted (my personal observation of \"haunted\", so don't quote me) by a string of shark attacks everywhere they go (Amity, SeaWorld Florida, and the Bahamas). Third, the \"overview\" is part of the films, so it probably shouldn't be separate from them. The way it is set up, it makes it seem like you're going to give an overview of the franchise, and not just a rundown of the plot of each film. Last, the Rotten Tomatoes scores are kind of deceptive. It makes it seem like these were the critic impressions when the films were released, and RT wasn't around back then and most of the reviews on RT are within the past 10 years. Also, I not sure if 19 reviews is a large enough sample size to be representative of most critics. That's just me. Overall, it's a pretty thorough article on the franchise\/film series.  +++$+++ Just looking over the article, it looks pretty good. I would probably just get a copy edit done from someone you know does good copy editing. A few things caught my eye. First, I would probably call ''JAWS'' a franchise. It has video games, Universal rides, multiple films, and an iconic figure (the shark). The fact that it has games and rides that are extensions of the original film, and not simply adaptations of said film, I'd say you are probably more [[Jaws (franchise)]] than [[Jaws (film series)]]. Second, I think you go into too much detail about what the first film has spawned in that first lead paragraph. I think the first paragraph should focus--although a brief mentioning of other items--what the franchise is based on. It's based on a film (yes, the film and not the book, because it if wasn't for the film no one would even know what the book was) from 1975. Give a little more detail about the film series there. For instance, the films are more than just a shark attacking a particular area, but really how one family (The Brodys) are basically haunted (my personal observation of "haunted", so don't quote me) by a string of shark attacks everywhere they go (Amity, SeaWorld Florida, and the Bahamas). Third, the "overview" is part of the films, so it probably shouldn't be separate from them. The way it is set up, it makes it seem like you're going to give an overview of the franchise, and not just a rundown of the plot of each film. Last, the Rotten Tomatoes scores are kind of deceptive. It makes it seem like these were the critic impressions when the films were released, and RT wasn't around back then and most of the reviews on RT are within the past 10 years. Also, I not sure if 19 reviews is a large enough sample size to be representative of most critics. That's just me. Overall, it's a pretty thorough article on the franchise/film series. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 01:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
264763 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264762 +++$+++ 264762 +++$+++ 2010-04-17 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.271492700E09 +++$+++ P.S. You could probably get away with an audio clip of the ''Jaws'' theme, since I'm sure there's enough critical commentary both in the article and still out there to be found to support a short clip of the theme.  +++$+++ :P.S. You could probably get away with an audio clip of the ''Jaws'' theme, since I'm sure there's enough critical commentary both in the article and still out there to be found to support a short clip of the theme. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 01:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

175199 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-08 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.278621360E09 +++$+++ I don't think Claire Wynn is Gladys Tuffnell. I'll keep an eye on the editor, though, because I can see why you do.&mdash; +++$+++ I don't think Claire Wynn is Gladys Tuffnell. I'll keep an eye on the editor, though, because I can see why you do.&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 13:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
175200 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175199 +++$+++ 175199 +++$+++ 2010-07-08 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.278623520E09 +++$+++ The account has only one edit in the last two years. Believe me, if I see edit warring on Ferrol again, I won't hesitate to block the account. I'm somewhere around 80% in agreement with you, I just need to see a little more activity.&mdash; +++$+++ :The account has only one edit in the last two years. Believe me, if I see edit warring on Ferrol again, I won't hesitate to block the account. I'm somewhere around 80% in agreement with you, I just need to see a little more activity.&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 14:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

264764 +++$+++ UtherSRG +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-21 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.271915220E09 +++$+++ For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|for biographies]], [[WP:WEB|for web sites]], [[WP:BAND|for bands]], or [[WP:CORP|for companies]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn -->   +++$+++ For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|for biographies]], [[WP:WEB|for web sites]], [[WP:BAND|for bands]], or [[WP:CORP|for companies]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn -->  [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 22:47, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
264765 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264764 +++$+++ 264764 +++$+++ 2010-04-21 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.271915340E09 +++$+++ ?? This article has nothing to do with me. Are you asking me to delete it?  +++$+++ :?? This article has nothing to do with me. Are you asking me to delete it? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

264766 +++$+++ Hunter Kahn +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-22 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.271931420E09 +++$+++ I've conducted a [[Talk:Jekyll (TV series)\/GA1|GAN review]] of [[Jekyll (TV series)]], and left some comments. None are insurmountable, and I'm sure you can address them and get this article to GA status in no time. Let me know once they've been addressed. Good luck, and nice work so far! \u2014 <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">Hun<\/font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">ter<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Hunter_Kahn|<font color=\"#595454\">Ka<\/font>]] +++$+++ I've conducted a [[Talk:Jekyll (TV series)/GA1|GAN review]] of [[Jekyll (TV series)]], and left some comments. None are insurmountable, and I'm sure you can address them and get this article to GA status in no time. Let me know once they've been addressed. Good luck, and nice work so far! — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 03:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
264767 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264766 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.272070200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply to my [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Gaunt&diff=prev&oldid=357849193 comment]. All information of Wikipedia should be [[WP:V|verifiable]] by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I'm sure that after reading those policies you will agree that the inclusion on that information currently breaches our standards. Additionally, your suggestion of contacting Moffat would breach [[WP:OR]].  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your reply to my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gaunt&diff=prev&oldid=357849193 comment]. All information of Wikipedia should be [[WP:V|verifiable]] by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I'm sure that after reading those policies you will agree that the inclusion on that information currently breaches our standards. Additionally, your suggestion of contacting Moffat would breach [[WP:OR]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:50, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

264768 +++$+++ Bradley0110 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264768 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-23 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.272070500E09 +++$+++ Regarding Moffat's proposed sequel, he has mentioned it in another interview besides the one with the Star-Ledger. It might have been in a magazine, which I'm sure is archived on ''that popular Moffat fansite'', which I can't link to here because of the oodles of copyright violations it makes.  +++$+++ Regarding Moffat's proposed sequel, he has mentioned it in another interview besides the one with the Star-Ledger. It might have been in a magazine, which I'm sure is archived on ''that popular Moffat fansite'', which I can't link to here because of the oodles of copyright violations it makes. [[User:Bradley0110|Bradley0110]] ([[User talk:Bradley0110|talk]]) 17:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
264769 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264768 +++$+++ 264768 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.272070800E09 +++$+++ I assume you mean the one that ends in .net? If a specific link appeared on this page, and then removed because whoever added it immediately realised it was a copyvio, I can see what we can salvage?  +++$+++ :I assume you mean the one that ends in .net? If a specific link appeared on this page, and then removed because whoever added it immediately realised it was a copyvio, I can see what we can salvage? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:00, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
264770 +++$+++ Bradley0110 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264768 +++$+++ 264769 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.272071520E09 +++$+++ No, my mistake, it's not on there. I was sure that I'd read it somewhere else reliable besides in the original article. Oh, well.  +++$+++ ::No, my mistake, it's not on there. I was sure that I'd read it somewhere else reliable besides in the original article. Oh, well. [[User:Bradley0110|Bradley0110]] ([[User talk:Bradley0110|talk]]) 18:12, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
264771 +++$+++ Bradley0110 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264768 +++$+++ 264770 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.272072360E09 +++$+++ Nevermind, found it now.  +++$+++ :::Nevermind, found it now. [[User:Bradley0110|Bradley0110]] ([[User talk:Bradley0110|talk]]) 18:26, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

2625 +++$+++ Gzkn +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-17 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166372880E09 +++$+++ Hey there Mark. I removed your addition of trivia to this article, because it was unencyclopedic and not verified. You also might want to take a look at [[Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles]]. Regards,  +++$+++ Hey there Mark. I removed your addition of trivia to this article, because it was unencyclopedic and not verified. You also might want to take a look at [[Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles]]. Regards, [[User:Gzkn|Gzkn]] 08:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
2626 +++$+++ Gzkn +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2625 +++$+++ 2625 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.166373780E09 +++$+++ Ah, I'm currently on [[WP:RCP|recent changes patrol]], which means I'm on the lookout for vandalism and the like (your edit wasn't vandalism though!). I use a nifty tool called [[User:Lupin\/Anti-vandal_tool|Lupin's anti-vandal tool]] to spot questionable changes such as  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_%28film%29&diff=94856828&oldid=94569311 this one]. The tool often spits out false positives though, so sometimes I take a look at edits which may need improvement instead. Anyway, hope you're enjoying your Reggae! :-) Good job so far with Claude Moore Colonial Farm. Happy editing!  +++$+++ :Ah, I'm currently on [[WP:RCP|recent changes patrol]], which means I'm on the lookout for vandalism and the like (your edit wasn't vandalism though!). I use a nifty tool called [[User:Lupin/Anti-vandal_tool|Lupin's anti-vandal tool]] to spot questionable changes such as  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_%28film%29&diff=94856828&oldid=94569311 this one]. The tool often spits out false positives though, so sometimes I take a look at edits which may need improvement instead. Anyway, hope you're enjoying your Reggae! :-) Good job so far with Claude Moore Colonial Farm. Happy editing! [[User:Gzkn|Gzkn]] 08:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

526915 +++$+++ The Rambling Man on tour +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526915 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-21 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.198242120E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for you note regarding the subject.  I'm afraid my mentoring role clearly hasn't been taken up too well by Ms Harrison who doesn't seem to have grasped the idea of COI or spamming.  Shame really.  So, as I said at the MfD for her sandbox, as long as someone has asked her to stop spamming and if she intends to do anything furthe with her sandbox, I'll be more than happy for someone to delete the sandbox and, if needed, block her account and her IP from adding more spam.  I won't take offence, it's too hot for me to do that!  As you're probably aware, I can't do too much, I'm in an internet cafe in [[Vang Vieng]] at the moment so not particularly secure for admin work...  Let me know what you decide to do (if anything).  All the best and thanks again for giving me a shout.   +++$+++ Hey, thanks for you note regarding the subject.  I'm afraid my mentoring role clearly hasn't been taken up too well by Ms Harrison who doesn't seem to have grasped the idea of COI or spamming.  Shame really.  So, as I said at the MfD for her sandbox, as long as someone has asked her to stop spamming and if she intends to do anything furthe with her sandbox, I'll be more than happy for someone to delete the sandbox and, if needed, block her account and her IP from adding more spam.  I won't take offence, it's too hot for me to do that!  As you're probably aware, I can't do too much, I'm in an internet cafe in [[Vang Vieng]] at the moment so not particularly secure for admin work...  Let me know what you decide to do (if anything).  All the best and thanks again for giving me a shout.  [[User:The Rambling Man on tour|The Rambling Man on tour]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man on tour|talk]]) 05:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
526916 +++$+++ The Rambling Man on tour +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526915 +++$+++ 526915 +++$+++ 2007-12-23 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.198441020E09 +++$+++ Hey again, thanks for your response.  Damn, these keyboards in Laos are sticky...!  Right, your point is a good one, I've gone back to Ms H and suggested that in two weeks from now her sandbox will be summarily removed unless she either rights it or communicates otherwise.  I'm not dictating that I should be the offending admin who destroys her work once again, in fact I'd appreciate it if someone with a decent secure login (and decent keyboard) would conclude the act should it be that I'm elsewhere engaged...  Cheers again, and happy tidings, all the best at this time of year!   +++$+++ :Hey again, thanks for your response.  Damn, these keyboards in Laos are sticky...!  Right, your point is a good one, I've gone back to Ms H and suggested that in two weeks from now her sandbox will be summarily removed unless she either rights it or communicates otherwise.  I'm not dictating that I should be the offending admin who destroys her work once again, in fact I'd appreciate it if someone with a decent secure login (and decent keyboard) would conclude the act should it be that I'm elsewhere engaged...  Cheers again, and happy tidings, all the best at this time of year!  [[User:The Rambling Man on tour|The Rambling Man on tour]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man on tour|talk]]) 12:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

264772 +++$+++ Decora +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-26 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.272307020E09 +++$+++ i will find a quote from a source... it will take some time. however this policy if applied literally to all of wikipedia as strictly as you have applied it here, would wipe out virtually ever user-created map, chart, etc in the project. if one says that 'braeburn apples closely resemble pink lady apples' and post a picture of each type of apple, it is debatable whether that is 'original research' to the extent that is intended to be banned by wikipedia.   +++$+++ i will find a quote from a source... it will take some time. however this policy if applied literally to all of wikipedia as strictly as you have applied it here, would wipe out virtually ever user-created map, chart, etc in the project. if one says that 'braeburn apples closely resemble pink lady apples' and post a picture of each type of apple, it is debatable whether that is 'original research' to the extent that is intended to be banned by wikipedia.  [[User:Decora|Decora]] ([[User talk:Decora|talk]]) 11:37, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
264773 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264772 +++$+++ 264772 +++$+++ 2010-04-27 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.272386940E09 +++$+++ Such a comparison between the two kinds of apple is indeed down to the interpretation of the editor, and, as such, would be a breach of OR.  +++$+++ :Such a comparison between the two kinds of apple is indeed down to the interpretation of the editor, and, as such, would be a breach of OR. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:49, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

393654 +++$+++ Crockspot +++$+++ Panoptical +++$+++ 393654 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-21 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.187746860E09 +++$+++ Is there a particular reason why you are reverting the courtesy blanking of my rfa? I was told this would be fine. -  +++$+++ Is there a particular reason why you are reverting the courtesy blanking of my rfa? I was told this would be fine. - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 18:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
393655 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ Panoptical +++$+++ 393654 +++$+++ 393654 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.187746980E09 +++$+++ Crockspot's RFA can be courtesy blanked - there's no need for archived discussions to be prominantly displayed like that.  Please do not restore it again.  Cheers,  +++$+++ *Crockspot's RFA can be courtesy blanked - there's no need for archived discussions to be prominantly displayed like that.  Please do not restore it again.  Cheers, [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 18:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

2631 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2631 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-16 05:50:00 +++$+++ 1.174049400E09 +++$+++ I think it is important to note that Spirit 03 was the last gunship to be brought down and that it has not been involved in a Class A mishap since that date. Should we include that?  +++$+++ I think it is important to note that Spirit 03 was the last gunship to be brought down and that it has not been involved in a Class A mishap since that date. Should we include that? [[User:BQZip01|BQZip01]] 05:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
2632 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2631 +++$+++ 2631 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.174050660E09 +++$+++ Special Ops...can't say why...lol. BTW, I madea a typo there. It should have been Spirit '''''0'''''3  +++$+++ :Special Ops...can't say why...lol. BTW, I madea a typo there. It should have been Spirit '''''0'''''3 [[User:BQZip01|BQZip01]] 06:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

104836 +++$+++  +++$+++ Samw +++$+++ 104836 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-13 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.176514380E09 +++$+++ I saw that you signed up as a participant. Would you be interested in helping to get the Chapter going? We're seeking approx. 10 members to help out get things rolling. Leave a note on the [[m:Talk:Wikimedia_Canada|WM Can page]] or on my [[v:User Talk:Historybuff|talk]] page. [[v:User:Historybuff]] 18:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ I saw that you signed up as a participant. Would you be interested in helping to get the Chapter going? We're seeking approx. 10 members to help out get things rolling. Leave a note on the [[m:Talk:Wikimedia_Canada|WM Can page]] or on my [[v:User Talk:Historybuff|talk]] page. [[v:User:Historybuff]] 18:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
104837 +++$+++  +++$+++ Samw +++$+++ 104836 +++$+++ 104836 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.176702180E09 +++$+++ Any feedback that you can give us would be great. Thanks for your support! [[v:User:Historybuff]] 22:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :Any feedback that you can give us would be great. Thanks for your support! [[v:User:Historybuff]] 22:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

526923 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-23 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.198419540E09 +++$+++ Please do not get into an edit war over this article. or risk violating 3RR. No  There is room for discussion, and as this is a BLP issue, it should be discussed before adding to the article.  Please keep [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:NPOV]] in mind.  There is room for dicussion, which is not the same as censorship.  See [[Talk:George Thomas Coker|talk page]]. &mdash;  +++$+++ Please do not get into an edit war over this article. or risk violating 3RR. No  There is room for discussion, and as this is a BLP issue, it should be discussed before adding to the article.  Please keep [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:NPOV]] in mind.  There is room for dicussion, which is not the same as censorship.  See [[Talk:George Thomas Coker|talk page]]. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 06:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
526924 +++$+++ Alansohn +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526923 +++$+++ 526923 +++$+++ 2007-12-23 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.198420320E09 +++$+++ Edit war?!?! You are creating a very poor picture of yourself by deleting content with one of the lamest excuses for removal and following that up with threats of violating 3RR. Removing sourced material because it doesn't fit with your own personal POV is patently uncivil. Any further removal of sourced content without providing evidence of specific violations of Wikipedia policy will be treated as vandalism. The burden of proof is on you to establish a justification, and so far you've offered nothing.  +++$+++ *Edit war?!?! You are creating a very poor picture of yourself by deleting content with one of the lamest excuses for removal and following that up with threats of violating 3RR. Removing sourced material because it doesn't fit with your own personal POV is patently uncivil. Any further removal of sourced content without providing evidence of specific violations of Wikipedia policy will be treated as vandalism. The burden of proof is on you to establish a justification, and so far you've offered nothing. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 06:32, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

526925 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-23 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.198479360E09 +++$+++ Again, I ask that you remain civil, try to step back from edit warring, work toward consensus, and also assume good faith on the part of your fellow editors.  We are here to improve Wikipedia, not harm it. &mdash;  +++$+++ Again, I ask that you remain civil, try to step back from edit warring, work toward consensus, and also assume good faith on the part of your fellow editors.  We are here to improve Wikipedia, not harm it. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 22:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
526926 +++$+++ Alansohn +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526925 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-23 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.198481760E09 +++$+++ Your bias astounds me. Deleting sourced material and making the patently false claim that I have started an edit war is some of the most pathetic interference I have ever seen on Wikipedia. Placing an accusation that someone is starting an edit war on the page of the person who has satisfied the burden of proof by providing sourced material, while carefully refusing to place the same statement on the individual who has made repeated false accusations of [[WP:BLP]] violations is bad faith at its most shameless. I understand you have a bias; try to find sources to support it and stop interfering with the addition of sourced material, and stop supporting unjustified removal of sourced material. I have worked towards consensus by offering the blandest, most meaningless statement that clips of Coker appeared in an award-winning documentary. That too was deleted as a [[WP:BLP]] violation. I added the quote to satisfy [[User:User:Rlevse]] demands for additional contest for the film. Your participation and claims of false threats seems intended to disrupt this article in the clearest possible [[WP:POINT]] violation and to hide material that provides a balanced perspective of the article's subject. I offered compromise, and you make threats. You desperately need to examine your actions before making further baseless accusations.  +++$+++ **Your bias astounds me. Deleting sourced material and making the patently false claim that I have started an edit war is some of the most pathetic interference I have ever seen on Wikipedia. Placing an accusation that someone is starting an edit war on the page of the person who has satisfied the burden of proof by providing sourced material, while carefully refusing to place the same statement on the individual who has made repeated false accusations of [[WP:BLP]] violations is bad faith at its most shameless. I understand you have a bias; try to find sources to support it and stop interfering with the addition of sourced material, and stop supporting unjustified removal of sourced material. I have worked towards consensus by offering the blandest, most meaningless statement that clips of Coker appeared in an award-winning documentary. That too was deleted as a [[WP:BLP]] violation. I added the quote to satisfy [[User:User:Rlevse]] demands for additional contest for the film. Your participation and claims of false threats seems intended to disrupt this article in the clearest possible [[WP:POINT]] violation and to hide material that provides a balanced perspective of the article's subject. I offered compromise, and you make threats. You desperately need to examine your actions before making further baseless accusations. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 23:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
526927 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526925 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.198673640E09 +++$+++ I did not accuse you of ''starting'' an edit war. Please re-read the note I left on your talk page.  Specifically, my words were \"Please do not get into an edit war over this article...\" It is a request that you avoid such.  No where does it say you started such.  I did not say you \"violated\" BLP, I said there was a BLP issue.  This was the case at the time I wrote the note &mdash; BLP had been raised by another editor and I requested that \"it should be discussed before adding to the article.\"  There was no accusation made or intended with this statement &mdash; simply that with BLP issues raised, that the matter needed to be discussed and a consensus reached. My note on your talk page was not meant to accuse you and I'm sorry that you took it that way.  Please continue all discussion of the article on the [[Talk:George Thomas Coker|article's talk page]].  Thank you. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 11:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC) ''Addendum'':  Lest there be any doubt, I made no threats against this editor. I choose not to further engage, but rather let Alanshon's tone and words speak for themselves.  &mdash;  +++$+++ *** I did not accuse you of ''starting'' an edit war. Please re-read the note I left on your talk page.  Specifically, my words were "Please do not get into an edit war over this article..." It is a request that you avoid such.  No where does it say you started such.  I did not say you "violated" BLP, I said there was a BLP issue.  This was the case at the time I wrote the note &mdash; BLP had been raised by another editor and I requested that "it should be discussed before adding to the article."  There was no accusation made or intended with this statement &mdash; simply that with BLP issues raised, that the matter needed to be discussed and a consensus reached. My note on your talk page was not meant to accuse you and I'm sorry that you took it that way.  Please continue all discussion of the article on the [[Talk:George Thomas Coker|article's talk page]].  Thank you. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 11:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC) ''Addendum'':  Lest there be any doubt, I made no threats against this editor. I choose not to further engage, but rather let Alanshon's tone and words speak for themselves.  &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 04:54, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
526928 +++$+++ Alansohn +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526925 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.198680720E09 +++$+++ In repsonse to your addendum, jumping in to warn regarding \"Please avoid WP:Edit warring and WP:3RR -- WP:BLP concerns & WP:NPOV concerns\" as a preemptive strike after deleting a clearly relevant addition to the article is uncivil and abusive of Wikipedia policy, and an apparent effort to intimidate and provoke. You and your article co-owner have repeatedly blocked the addition of information regarding this film to the article, in what clearly seems to be an effort to sanitize the content. As discussed with you, and in the talk page before you intruded in support of your co-owner, there are absolutely no [[WP:BLP]] issues, and the excuse [[User:Rlevse]] used to delete a mere link to the film \"upon subject request\" ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=George_Thomas_Coker&diff=177977095&oldid=177976640 see here]) betrays a clear violation of [[WP:COI]]. That you could have added a reference to the ''Faith of My Fathers'' film in which Coker is a single word mentioned in passing, while insisting that a reference to ''Hearts and Minds'' is inappropriate and lacks context betrays a disturbing inconsistency, to say the least. You demand that prior approval is required before adding material, while you have never discussed any of the changes you have made to the article. It is laughable to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:George_Thomas_Coker&diff=179736452&oldid=179370017 read your talk page comment] that justifies removing sourced material in reference to \"BLPs must be written conservatively, with regard for the subject's privacy.When writing about a person notable only for one or two events, including every detail can lead to problems, even when the material is well-sourced. In the best case, it can lead to an unencyclopedic article. In the worst case, it can be a serious violation of our policies on neutrality. When in doubt, biographies should be pared back to a version that is completely sourced, neutral, and on-topic.\" when there is no privacy issue, the material was well-sourced, and you yourself found it necessary to include a passing film mention as encyclopedic without bothering to ask anyone's permission. The NPOV concerns are nonsensical, as they exist equally with the McCain film details you've added, which also has its own NPOV issues that have been left ignored. Overall, the bottom line is that none of the issues you raised have any validity. The most disturbing aspect of your actions are the threats made on my talk page which appear intended to push me away from further editing of the article and to leave the one-sided presentation of the article undisturbed. Your threats speak for themselves.  +++$+++ ****In repsonse to your addendum, jumping in to warn regarding "Please avoid WP:Edit warring and WP:3RR -- WP:BLP concerns & WP:NPOV concerns" as a preemptive strike after deleting a clearly relevant addition to the article is uncivil and abusive of Wikipedia policy, and an apparent effort to intimidate and provoke. You and your article co-owner have repeatedly blocked the addition of information regarding this film to the article, in what clearly seems to be an effort to sanitize the content. As discussed with you, and in the talk page before you intruded in support of your co-owner, there are absolutely no [[WP:BLP]] issues, and the excuse [[User:Rlevse]] used to delete a mere link to the film "upon subject request" ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Thomas_Coker&diff=177977095&oldid=177976640 see here]) betrays a clear violation of [[WP:COI]]. That you could have added a reference to the ''Faith of My Fathers'' film in which Coker is a single word mentioned in passing, while insisting that a reference to ''Hearts and Minds'' is inappropriate and lacks context betrays a disturbing inconsistency, to say the least. You demand that prior approval is required before adding material, while you have never discussed any of the changes you have made to the article. It is laughable to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:George_Thomas_Coker&diff=179736452&oldid=179370017 read your talk page comment] that justifies removing sourced material in reference to "BLPs must be written conservatively, with regard for the subject's privacy.When writing about a person notable only for one or two events, including every detail can lead to problems, even when the material is well-sourced. In the best case, it can lead to an unencyclopedic article. In the worst case, it can be a serious violation of our policies on neutrality. When in doubt, biographies should be pared back to a version that is completely sourced, neutral, and on-topic." when there is no privacy issue, the material was well-sourced, and you yourself found it necessary to include a passing film mention as encyclopedic without bothering to ask anyone's permission. The NPOV concerns are nonsensical, as they exist equally with the McCain film details you've added, which also has its own NPOV issues that have been left ignored. Overall, the bottom line is that none of the issues you raised have any validity. The most disturbing aspect of your actions are the threats made on my talk page which appear intended to push me away from further editing of the article and to leave the one-sided presentation of the article undisturbed. Your threats speak for themselves. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 06:52, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

2638 +++$+++ Akradecki +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.176334380E09 +++$+++ I noticed your note about SAT being a CIA operation...I've heard that too, but I was wondering if they still are? They've got 3 747s sitting in storage here at Mojave, supposedly being used as a parts source for their flying aircraft. Also, FWIW, what do you know about Tepper being CIA, since they fly C-130s?  +++$+++ I noticed your note about SAT being a CIA operation...I've heard that too, but I was wondering if they still are? They've got 3 747s sitting in storage here at Mojave, supposedly being used as a parts source for their flying aircraft. Also, FWIW, what do you know about Tepper being CIA, since they fly C-130s? [[User:Akradecki|Akradecki]] 16:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
2639 +++$+++ Akradecki +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2638 +++$+++ 2638 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.176351540E09 +++$+++ BTW, I just created an article on [[Tepper Aviation]]...a copy edit and any C-130 related additions would be appreciated. I'll be adding a pic or two of Tepper -130s that have been in and out of MHV later this evening.  +++$+++ :BTW, I just created an article on [[Tepper Aviation]]...a copy edit and any C-130 related additions would be appreciated. I'll be adding a pic or two of Tepper -130s that have been in and out of MHV later this evening. [[User:Akradecki|Akradecki]] 21:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

264785 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264785 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.163716980E09 +++$+++ In that case I may start tonight. First I'll have a look at the problems you mentioned. I know that I have a tendency to over-link articles. I am trying my best to restrain myself but sometimes without success. Therefore, feel free to delete these links. Groetjes  +++$+++ In that case I may start tonight. First I'll have a look at the problems you mentioned. I know that I have a tendency to over-link articles. I am trying my best to restrain myself but sometimes without success. Therefore, feel free to delete these links. Groetjes [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] 14:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
264786 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264785 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.163729700E09 +++$+++ Merged them.  +++$+++ :: Merged them. [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] 18:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

526930 +++$+++ Archtransit +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-26 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.198724700E09 +++$+++ I see that you edited a few minutes ago.  DYK is over an hour late.  Someone filled up the next update page.  Could you move it to the main page?  Thank you.  +++$+++ I see that you edited a few minutes ago.  DYK is over an hour late.  Someone filled up the next update page.  Could you move it to the main page?  Thank you. [[User:Archtransit|Archtransit]] ([[User talk:Archtransit|talk]]) 19:05, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
526931 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526930 +++$+++ 526930 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.198725360E09 +++$+++ Nishkid64 took care of it.  Cheers. &mdash;  +++$+++ :Nishkid64 took care of it.  Cheers. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 19:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
526932 +++$+++ Archtransit +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526930 +++$+++ 526931 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.198726320E09 +++$+++ Thank you anyway.  Happy Boxing Day!  +++$+++ ::Thank you anyway.  Happy Boxing Day! [[User:Archtransit|Archtransit]] ([[User talk:Archtransit|talk]]) 19:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

2643 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-03 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.178252280E09 +++$+++ Ditto here. <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ Ditto here. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''— ''BQZip01'' —'''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 21:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2644 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2643 +++$+++ 2643 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.180564620E09 +++$+++ That's what anonymous friends whom you've never seen or actually met are for! On a completely unrelated topic, I've been working on a little something: the [[Texas A&M University]] page. It's been put up for Featured Article status and any [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Texas_A.26M_University|feedback]] you could give would be helpful. <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ :That's what anonymous friends whom you've never seen or actually met are for! On a completely unrelated topic, I've been working on a little something: the [[Texas A&M University]] page. It's been put up for Featured Article status and any [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Texas_A.26M_University|feedback]] you could give would be helpful. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''— ''BQZip01'' —'''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 15:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

526934 +++$+++ Jeffpw +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-27 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.198803420E09 +++$+++ I do believe Ben's story. I may just be a sucker, but it has a ring of truth to it. I actually knew about Alex living with Ben's family, as Ben and I have corresponded via MySpace and email since things went pearshaped. Maybe he is scamming me, but I think the threat to give all the info I have to his school has scared him into stopping any nonsense he may have been involved in. Also, his story about the others pretending to be him has been remarkably consistent for weeks now. That, coupled with the emails from Joe (the friend who was impersonating him) convince me that he is telling the truth now. I know there is a thin line between AGF and naivet\xe9, but I would hope the community can give him one last chance, and let me try to mentor him strictly. I am willing to take responsibility for how it goes, and I am also willing to do what is necessary to give him consequences if he screws up again.  +++$+++ I do believe Ben's story. I may just be a sucker, but it has a ring of truth to it. I actually knew about Alex living with Ben's family, as Ben and I have corresponded via MySpace and email since things went pearshaped. Maybe he is scamming me, but I think the threat to give all the info I have to his school has scared him into stopping any nonsense he may have been involved in. Also, his story about the others pretending to be him has been remarkably consistent for weeks now. That, coupled with the emails from Joe (the friend who was impersonating him) convince me that he is telling the truth now. I know there is a thin line between AGF and naiveté, but I would hope the community can give him one last chance, and let me try to mentor him strictly. I am willing to take responsibility for how it goes, and I am also willing to do what is necessary to give him consequences if he screws up again. [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] ([[User talk:Jeffpw|talk]]) 16:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
526935 +++$+++ Jeffpw +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.198804560E09 +++$+++ As I said on ANI, it's up to the community, whose patience has been exhausted. I won't be reporting him if he lives up to his side of the bargain, though, and I would hope others won't either, if he stops posting now. Maybe I should have been clearer in my instructions. I said \"Post an apology, promise never to post again, and stop editing\". I probably should have included \"and don't stay at ANI debating the subject to death\".  Let's hope he stops now (he reads all of my posts since the ban, so he will undoubtedly see this one, too).  +++$+++ :As I said on ANI, it's up to the community, whose patience has been exhausted. I won't be reporting him if he lives up to his side of the bargain, though, and I would hope others won't either, if he stops posting now. Maybe I should have been clearer in my instructions. I said "Post an apology, promise never to post again, and stop editing". I probably should have included "and don't stay at ANI debating the subject to death".  Let's hope he stops now (he reads all of my posts since the ban, so he will undoubtedly see this one, too). [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] ([[User talk:Jeffpw|talk]]) 17:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
526936 +++$+++ 89.241.192.147 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ 526935 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.198809060E09 +++$+++ The ones this morning were from Alex. The apology was from me. [[Special:Contributions\/89.241.192.147|89.241.192.147]] ( +++$+++ ::The ones this morning were from Alex. The apology was from me. [[Special:Contributions/89.241.192.147|89.241.192.147]] ([[User talk:89.241.192.147|talk]]) 18:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
526937 +++$+++ 89.241.248.161 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ 526936 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.198809780E09 +++$+++ Why is that important? I thought you werent going to file an abuse thing. That was part of the agreement. I promise I will (and have) told you everything, but please promise me you are not going to file an abuse report or contact the school or my parents? [[Special:Contributions\/89.241.248.161|89.241.248.161]] ( +++$+++ :::Why is that important? I thought you werent going to file an abuse thing. That was part of the agreement. I promise I will (and have) told you everything, but please promise me you are not going to file an abuse report or contact the school or my parents? [[Special:Contributions/89.241.248.161|89.241.248.161]] ([[User talk:89.241.248.161|talk]]) 18:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
526938 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ 526937 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.198810140E09 +++$+++ Switching IPs again?  I've made you no promises.  But, when I look at your willingness to accept responsibiity, that includes being fully honest, not evasive. When I ask about computers and you don't answer, you have not \"told [me] everything\". Being argumentative, and trying to debate, as pointed out on ANI, does not help you.  &mdash;  +++$+++ :::: Switching IPs again?  I've made you no promises.  But, when I look at your willingness to accept responsibiity, that includes being fully honest, not evasive. When I ask about computers and you don't answer, you have not "told [me] everything". Being argumentative, and trying to debate, as pointed out on ANI, does not help you.  &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 18:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
526939 +++$+++ 89.241.248.161 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ 526938 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.198810620E09 +++$+++ No no, i did not 'choose' to switch my IP address... it did it automatically, don't ask me why, I didn't even realise it could do that without restarting the internet. And fine, I'm editing from home if thats what you want to know... well my home for the moment anyway... [[Special:Contributions\/89.241.248.161|89.241.248.161]] ( +++$+++ ::::: No no, i did not 'choose' to switch my IP address... it did it automatically, don't ask me why, I didn't even realise it could do that without restarting the internet. And fine, I'm editing from home if thats what you want to know... well my home for the moment anyway... [[Special:Contributions/89.241.248.161|89.241.248.161]] ([[User talk:89.241.248.161|talk]]) 18:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
526940 +++$+++ Jeffpw +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ 526939 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.198810740E09 +++$+++ Are you Ben or Alex?  +++$+++ ::::::Are you Ben or Alex? [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] ([[User talk:Jeffpw|talk]]) 18:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
526941 +++$+++ Whitstable +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ 526940 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.198810920E09 +++$+++ Also now making [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=180464514 nonsense edits].  +++$+++ :::::::Also now making [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=180464514 nonsense edits]. [[User:Whitstable|Whitstable]] ([[User talk:Whitstable|talk]]) 19:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
526942 +++$+++ Jeffpw +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.198811760E09 +++$+++ Ben, please confine your remarks to this page, only answering the questions that ERcheck is asking you. Whitstable, please let ERcheck take things from here. Ganging up on Ben is not going to make a bad situation any better. I am leaving this in the hands of admin now.  +++$+++ *Ben, please confine your remarks to this page, only answering the questions that ERcheck is asking you. Whitstable, please let ERcheck take things from here. Ganging up on Ben is not going to make a bad situation any better. I am leaving this in the hands of admin now. [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] ([[User talk:Jeffpw|talk]]) 19:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
526943 +++$+++ 89.241.248.161 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ 526942 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.198812240E09 +++$+++ I'm going to bed... I am confused as to which school you think I go to though... [[Special:Contributions\/89.241.248.161|89.241.248.161]] ( +++$+++ ::I'm going to bed... I am confused as to which school you think I go to though... [[Special:Contributions/89.241.248.161|89.241.248.161]] ([[User talk:89.241.248.161|talk]]) 19:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
526944 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526934 +++$+++ 526943 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.198812840E09 +++$+++ I will be away for a few hours.  Ben has sufficiently asnwered my computer question.  I am courtesy blanking it.  &mdash;  +++$+++ ::: I will be away for a few hours.  Ben has sufficiently asnwered my computer question.  I am courtesy blanking it.  &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 19:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

262585 +++$+++ InvictaHOG +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.157075940E09 +++$+++ Congratulations and great work bringing epilepsy up to featured list!  +++$+++ Congratulations and great work bringing epilepsy up to featured list! [[User:InvictaHOG|InvictaHOG]] 18:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
262586 +++$+++ Ikkyu2 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262585 +++$+++ 262585 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.157107800E09 +++$+++ Yes, the article's really improved since the last time I looked at it.  Bravo!  I also left a brief note under section 29 of your Talk\/Archive 1. -<font color=\"#2000C0\"> +++$+++ :Yes, the article's really improved since the last time I looked at it.  Bravo!  I also left a brief note under section 29 of your Talk/Archive 1. -<font color="#2000C0">[[User:Ikkyu2|ikkyu2]]</font> (<font color="#00FF00">[[User_talk:Ikkyu2|talk]]</font>) 03:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

264792 +++$+++ Leaveon1DI +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-08 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.176068640E09 +++$+++ User '''GhostofSuperslum''' became overly active with politics and history.  User [[Leaveon1DI]] will be less active, especially politically.  [[Leaveon1DI]] intends to grow flowers and to submit images.  '''GhostofSuperslum''' is finished, forever.  Thanks for asking. +++$+++ User '''GhostofSuperslum''' became overly active with politics and history.  User [[Leaveon1DI]] will be less active, especially politically.  [[Leaveon1DI]] intends to grow flowers and to submit images.  '''GhostofSuperslum''' is finished, forever.  Thanks for asking.[[User:Leaveon1DI|Leaveon1DI]] 14:44, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
264793 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264792 +++$+++ 264792 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.176072480E09 +++$+++ Good luck with the flower growing. ;-)  +++$+++ :Good luck with the flower growing. ;-) [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] 15:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

could not match s.örvarr.s
264796 +++$+++ s.örvarr.s +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264796 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-26 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.188124860E09 +++$+++ I'd say \"is\" was the right word here since the sentence is about the band being the best band ever as a whole, a group. People have been arguing a lot about this matter. Whether to say \"is\" or \"are\" in similar cases. One user said that according to British English, \"is\" is right in this case but I doubt that it differs in UK and USA English. Good times! -- +++$+++ I'd say "is" was the right word here since the sentence is about the band being the best band ever as a whole, a group. People have been arguing a lot about this matter. Whether to say "is" or "are" in similar cases. One user said that according to British English, "is" is right in this case but I doubt that it differs in UK and USA English. Good times! --[[User:S.Örvarr.S|Stefán Örvarr Sigmundsson]] 03:41, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
264797 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264796 +++$+++ 264796 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.188144240E09 +++$+++ Good morning. You can use either. It all depends on emphasis. The singular stresses the non-personal collectivity of the group and the plural the personal individuality within the group. However, since Beatles is a plural noun, I would still go for \"are\" or, if I really wanted to use the singular, form a construction like \"the band, The Beatles, is ...\"  +++$+++ :Good morning. You can use either. It all depends on emphasis. The singular stresses the non-personal collectivity of the group and the plural the personal individuality within the group. However, since Beatles is a plural noun, I would still go for "are" or, if I really wanted to use the singular, form a construction like "the band, The Beatles, is ..." [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] 09:04, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
could not match s.örvarr.s
264798 +++$+++ s.örvarr.s +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264796 +++$+++ 264797 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.188233460E09 +++$+++ Thank you. This was just a random example. But with the band [[Muse (band)|Muse]], \"is\" would be right, if there is no special emphasis, and, since \"Muse\" is a singular noun? -- +++$+++ ::Thank you. This was just a random example. But with the band [[Muse (band)|Muse]], "is" would be right, if there is no special emphasis, and, since "Muse" is a singular noun? --[[User:S.Örvarr.S|Stefán Örvarr Sigmundsson]] 09:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
264799 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264796 +++$+++ 264798 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.189644660E09 +++$+++ My gut feeling still would say \"are.\"  +++$+++ ::: My gut feeling still would say "are." [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] 17:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
could not match s.örvarr.s
264800 +++$+++ s.örvarr.s +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264796 +++$+++ 264799 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.190111580E09 +++$+++ Do you think there's any difference between UK and USA in this matter? -- +++$+++ ::::Do you think there's any difference between UK and USA in this matter? --[[User:S.Örvarr.S|Stefán Örvarr Sigmundsson]] 03:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

44133 +++$+++ Lexein +++$+++ Twsx +++$+++ 44133 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-17 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.279379400E09 +++$+++ I'm happy to be [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Huggle\/Whitelist whitelisted].  I guess I'd like a Userbox for \"Huggler Ignored\" - \"This user is proud to be ignored by Huggler\" , since I'm not a Huggler user.  Hmmm? -- +++$+++ I'm happy to be [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Huggle/Whitelist whitelisted].  I guess I'd like a Userbox for "Huggler Ignored" - "This user is proud to be ignored by Huggler" , since I'm not a Huggler user.  Hmmm? --[[User:Lexein|Lexein]] ([[User talk:Lexein|talk]]) 08:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
44134 +++$+++ Twsx +++$+++ Twsx +++$+++ 44133 +++$+++ 44133 +++$+++ 2010-07-17 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.279431480E09 +++$+++ I don't get it. :( ~&nbsp;<span style=\"color:#FF0000;font-weight:bold;\">|&nbsp;<small> +++$+++ :I don't get it. :( ~&nbsp;<span style="color:#FF0000;font-weight:bold;">|&nbsp;<small>[[User:Twsx|twsx]]</small>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Twsx|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Twsx|cont]]</sub></small>&nbsp;|</span>&nbsp;~ 22:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
44135 +++$+++ Lexein +++$+++ Twsx +++$+++ 44133 +++$+++ 44134 +++$+++ 2010-07-18 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.279442280E09 +++$+++ I think it's something of an accomplishment to be whitelisted. And since Huggler is your creation, I thought you might prefer to control the creation of any infoboxes for Huggler.  Sorry, lame request.  -- +++$+++ ::I think it's something of an accomplishment to be whitelisted. And since Huggler is your creation, I thought you might prefer to control the creation of any infoboxes for Huggler.  Sorry, lame request.  --[[User:Lexein|Lexein]] ([[User talk:Lexein|talk]]) 01:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
44136 +++$+++ Twsx +++$+++ Twsx +++$+++ 44133 +++$+++ 44135 +++$+++ 2010-07-18 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.279489380E09 +++$+++ Oh. :) No, i give up any and all rights to the term \"Huggler\". You may use it in any way you like. :D ~&nbsp;<span style=\"color:#FF0000;font-weight:bold;\">|&nbsp;<small> +++$+++ :::Oh. :) No, i give up any and all rights to the term "Huggler". You may use it in any way you like. :D ~&nbsp;<span style="color:#FF0000;font-weight:bold;">|&nbsp;<small>[[User:Twsx|twsx]]</small>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Twsx|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Twsx|cont]]</sub></small>&nbsp;|</span>&nbsp;~ 14:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

264801 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-12 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.189616220E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] 09:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
264802 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264801 +++$+++ 264801 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.189644660E09 +++$+++ Having read some of your contributions and regarding my Hebrew skills, I am convinced that you are very well able to do it yourself. However, if you want to I am more than willing to proof-read your translations. Shanah tovah to you too.  +++$+++ :Having read some of your contributions and regarding my Hebrew skills, I am convinced that you are very well able to do it yourself. However, if you want to I am more than willing to proof-read your translations. Shanah tovah to you too. [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] 17:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

2659 +++$+++ Akradecki +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-25 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.190776020E09 +++$+++ Mark, I'm looking for a source that tells what the investigation concluded to be the cause in the Sept 6 2000 C-130A air tanker crash in France...any ideas? ''' +++$+++ Mark, I'm looking for a source that tells what the investigation concluded to be the cause in the Sept 6 2000 C-130A air tanker crash in France...any ideas? '''[[User:Akradecki|<font style="color:#62BB32;">AK<font style="color:#006400;">Radecki</font></font>]]'''<sup>[[User_talk:Akradecki|<font style="color:#62BB32;">Speaketh</font>]]</sup> 20:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
2660 +++$+++ Akradecki +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2659 +++$+++ 2659 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.190786580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the link! I find it curious that that link, as well as the NTSB summary, are still only preliminary and have no probable cause information, 7 years after the incident. I am, of course, wanting to find out if this was a wing structure incident like the three U.S. crashes, or was caused by something unrelated. Oh well. Thanks much! (And thanks for the reply on the covert use issue.) ''' +++$+++ :Thanks for the link! I find it curious that that link, as well as the NTSB summary, are still only preliminary and have no probable cause information, 7 years after the incident. I am, of course, wanting to find out if this was a wing structure incident like the three U.S. crashes, or was caused by something unrelated. Oh well. Thanks much! (And thanks for the reply on the covert use issue.) '''[[User:Akradecki|<font style="color:#62BB32;">AK<font style="color:#006400;">Radecki</font></font>]]'''<sup>[[User_talk:Akradecki|<font style="color:#62BB32;">Speaketh</font>]]</sup> 23:03, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

2662 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2662 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-02 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.191379020E09 +++$+++ [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] 19:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] 19:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] 19:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
2663 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2662 +++$+++ 2662 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Yeah, It confused me to. The details of the first incident hit the news just as  the second incident occurred. ps. any thoughts of putting lastest incidents at the top of the page? or would it take too much to change the whole page top to bottom? Talskiddy 07:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :Yeah, It confused me to. The details of the first incident hit the news just as  the second incident occurred. ps. any thoughts of putting lastest incidents at the top of the page? or would it take too much to change the whole page top to bottom? Talskiddy 07:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

2664 +++$+++ Akradecki +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2664 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.191901020E09 +++$+++ Mark, I'm finally done with the [[U.S. Forest Service airtanker scandal]] article...this is the event that I asked you for sources regarding covert use. Turns out that, although there were allegations of covert use, there was never any corroborating evidence, only testimony from one whistleblower. Anyway, if you sleeping problems tonight, reading through this new article will probably solve them! ''' +++$+++ Mark, I'm finally done with the [[U.S. Forest Service airtanker scandal]] article...this is the event that I asked you for sources regarding covert use. Turns out that, although there were allegations of covert use, there was never any corroborating evidence, only testimony from one whistleblower. Anyway, if you sleeping problems tonight, reading through this new article will probably solve them! '''[[User:Akradecki|<font style="color:#62BB32;">AK<font style="color:#006400;">Radecki</font></font>]]'''<sup>[[User_talk:Akradecki|<font style="color:#62BB32;">Speaketh</font>]]</sup> 20:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
2665 +++$+++ Akradecki +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2664 +++$+++ 2664 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.191902580E09 +++$+++ Mark, thanks for the offer on the identies...that would be a big help. I'd like to add a subpage list of those. Unfortunately, the one \"official\" list I found was redacted to remove the aircraft numbers. ''' +++$+++ :Mark, thanks for the offer on the identies...that would be a big help. I'd like to add a subpage list of those. Unfortunately, the one "official" list I found was redacted to remove the aircraft numbers. '''[[User:Akradecki|<font style="color:#62BB32;">AK<font style="color:#006400;">Radecki</font></font>]]'''<sup>[[User_talk:Akradecki|<font style="color:#62BB32;">Speaketh</font>]]</sup> 21:03, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

526953 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526953 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-31 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.199163720E09 +++$+++ ER, I don't know how to thank you for your help, you are one heck of a friend. What do you think of it so far? Ref.#74 needs proper format, I can't figure that one out.  +++$+++ ER, I don't know how to thank you for your help, you are one heck of a friend. What do you think of it so far? Ref.#74 needs proper format, I can't figure that one out. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 21:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
526954 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526953 +++$+++ 526953 +++$+++ 2007-12-31 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.199164740E09 +++$+++ No, I won't be working on the workshop. Maybe later in the day I'll add a \"table\" with all the MoH's.  +++$+++ *No, I won't be working on the workshop. Maybe later in the day I'll add a "table" with all the MoH's. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 21:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

2667 +++$+++ Maralia +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2667 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-15 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.192444380E09 +++$+++ Could you take a look at this article you created, in light of the existence also of the article [[USS Tyler (1857)]]? It seems that the info about her participation in the ''Sultana'' rescue should be merged into 'USS Tyler', leaving 'Gunboat Tyler' as a redirect. Thanks!  +++$+++ Could you take a look at this article you created, in light of the existence also of the article [[USS Tyler (1857)]]? It seems that the info about her participation in the ''Sultana'' rescue should be merged into 'USS Tyler', leaving 'Gunboat Tyler' as a redirect. Thanks! [[User:Maralia|Maralia]] 03:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
2668 +++$+++ Maralia +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2667 +++$+++ 2667 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.193346600E09 +++$+++ Thanks - you're a peach!  +++$+++ :Thanks - you're a peach! [[User:Maralia|Maralia]] 14:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

526956 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526956 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.199278080E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 04:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
526957 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526956 +++$+++ 526956 +++$+++ 2008-01-17 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.200574200E09 +++$+++ Please feel free to replace this image with the appropriate \"replaceable\" image.&mdash;  +++$+++ : Please feel free to replace this image with the appropriate "replaceable" image.&mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 04:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
526958 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526956 +++$+++ 526957 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.202629080E09 +++$+++ Fair use rationale provided by another editor. &mdash;  +++$+++ :: Fair use rationale provided by another editor. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 23:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

2669 +++$+++ Vaoverland +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.193808540E09 +++$+++ There is an item already started in the Ocean Isle Beach article. That is probably best place for it to fit into WP. I understand your feelings and need to do something. I will keep and eye there. use my talk page to communicate with me if you like. I am a WP admin. I also have been in some touch with the frat folks alumni in Columbia SC who are working hard to provide long-term and appropriate comfort and support to people closest to this very very sad thing. My email is vgn700@aol.com if you would rather communicate off-line. Please flag your email Ocean Isle Beach in subject line if you do, as I geta  lot of email and wouldnt want to miss it. Good luck on helping and in feeling more  peace. They are in God's hands now, and everyone else must go on.  +++$+++ There is an item already started in the Ocean Isle Beach article. That is probably best place for it to fit into WP. I understand your feelings and need to do something. I will keep and eye there. use my talk page to communicate with me if you like. I am a WP admin. I also have been in some touch with the frat folks alumni in Columbia SC who are working hard to provide long-term and appropriate comfort and support to people closest to this very very sad thing. My email is vgn700@aol.com if you would rather communicate off-line. Please flag your email Ocean Isle Beach in subject line if you do, as I geta  lot of email and wouldnt want to miss it. Good luck on helping and in feeling more  peace. They are in God's hands now, and everyone else must go on. [[User:Vaoverland|Mark in Historic Triangle]] 22:29, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
2670 +++$+++ Vaoverland +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2669 +++$+++ 2669 +++$+++ 2007-11-05 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.194315120E09 +++$+++ I have been working fairly steadily since our earlier communication to keep this portion of the OIB article up-to-date and on balance. Hopefully, we are achieving some of what you were feeling a need for. Reading about the waterside gathering for Travis Cale was particularly moving for me; you might benefit as well. Here is a link:   [http:\/\/www.thestate.com\/beachfire\/story\/219825.html Mourners recall young man who touched lives]. Best wishes.  +++$+++ :I have been working fairly steadily since our earlier communication to keep this portion of the OIB article up-to-date and on balance. Hopefully, we are achieving some of what you were feeling a need for. Reading about the waterside gathering for Travis Cale was particularly moving for me; you might benefit as well. Here is a link:   [http://www.thestate.com/beachfire/story/219825.html Mourners recall young man who touched lives]. Best wishes. [[User:Vaoverland|Mark in Historic Triangle]] 18:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

2671 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-18 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.197992040E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 07:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
2672 +++$+++ Snowmanradio +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2671 +++$+++ 2671 +++$+++ 2007-12-18 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.198009740E09 +++$+++ The edit history has to follow the text of the page for legal reasons of copyright.  When a cut and paste move is done the edit history is not moved.  Use the \"move\" tag at the top of the screen and the text and the edit history are moved together. If the target page is not available then it cat be deleted, if the move is appropriate.  Probably the easiest way to repair your cut-and-paste move is to delete the Edward T page and do the move again using the move tag, an administrator need to help here.  +++$+++ :The edit history has to follow the text of the page for legal reasons of copyright.  When a cut and paste move is done the edit history is not moved.  Use the "move" tag at the top of the screen and the text and the edit history are moved together. If the target page is not available then it cat be deleted, if the move is appropriate.  Probably the easiest way to repair your cut-and-paste move is to delete the Edward T page and do the move again using the move tag, an administrator need to help here. [[User:Snowmanradio|Snowman]] ([[User talk:Snowmanradio|talk]]) 12:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

526960 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-11 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.200047160E09 +++$+++ Would you say that the article in my workshop is ready for mainspace?  +++$+++ Would you say that the article in my workshop is ready for mainspace? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 02:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
526961 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526960 +++$+++ 526960 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.200050940E09 +++$+++ Yes, I have done some revisions. I'll wait for you to look it over.  +++$+++ *Yes, I have done some revisions. I'll wait for you to look it over. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 03:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
526962 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526960 +++$+++ 526960 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.200051840E09 +++$+++ The portal looks great. I recommend Sgt. [[Angel Mendez]], either for a future \"Selected Bio\" or the \"DYK\" section. I'm working on his MoH and already I have the Puerto Rican Senate's backing and Congressman J. Serrano. I'm waiting to hear from Congressman C. Rangel. One thing that I wanted to know about the portal. Why is it that the \"top\" section has links to subjects such as \"Italian Wars\" \xb7 \"Military history of Africa\" \xb7 \"Military history of France\", etc.? I'm just wondering.  +++$+++ :The portal looks great. I recommend Sgt. [[Angel Mendez]], either for a future "Selected Bio" or the "DYK" section. I'm working on his MoH and already I have the Puerto Rican Senate's backing and Congressman J. Serrano. I'm waiting to hear from Congressman C. Rangel. One thing that I wanted to know about the portal. Why is it that the "top" section has links to subjects such as "Italian Wars" · "Military history of Africa" · "Military history of France", etc.? I'm just wondering. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 03:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

264817 +++$+++ BillCJ +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264817 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-10 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.205207460E09 +++$+++ I've noticed you've been adding a rather lengthy list of world army air arms to several such articles. This got me thinking that perhaps it's time to create a dedicated article on the subject, where we can also list those article, saving space in the national articles. There is a category at [[:Category:Army aviation]], so I think [[Army aviation]] (this currently redirects to [[Military aviation]]) is a good title. Any comments or ideas? Perhaps there's a simliar article on one of the interwikis that can be translated as a starting point, or used for sources. -  +++$+++ I've noticed you've been adding a rather lengthy list of world army air arms to several such articles. This got me thinking that perhaps it's time to create a dedicated article on the subject, where we can also list those article, saving space in the national articles. There is a category at [[:Category:Army aviation]], so I think [[Army aviation]] (this currently redirects to [[Military aviation]]) is a good title. Any comments or ideas? Perhaps there's a simliar article on one of the interwikis that can be translated as a starting point, or used for sources. - [[User:BillCJ|BillCJ]] ([[User talk:BillCJ|talk]]) 20:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
264818 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264817 +++$+++ 264817 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.205280780E09 +++$+++ Sounds like a good idea to me. The one I am most familiar with is the one on Army Aviation on the German wikipedia([[de:wikipedia:Heeresflieger]]). Although it is mostly concerned with the [[German Army Aviators Corps]], it, as well as the other ones in the category you mentioned, does contain some general information which could be used to start a new article on Army Aviation. And from then on, only the sky's the limit. However, at the mo I don't have that much time to begin the work but I promise to do so at the end of March. Cheers.   +++$+++ *Sounds like a good idea to me. The one I am most familiar with is the one on Army Aviation on the German wikipedia([[de:wikipedia:Heeresflieger]]). Although it is mostly concerned with the [[German Army Aviators Corps]], it, as well as the other ones in the category you mentioned, does contain some general information which could be used to start a new article on Army Aviation. And from then on, only the sky's the limit. However, at the mo I don't have that much time to begin the work but I promise to do so at the end of March. Cheers.  [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] ([[User talk:Ekki01#top|talk]]) 17:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

2674 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-01 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.199242260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Jaws_2&curid=352795&diff=181404665&oldid=178844103 your addition] to [[Jaws 2]]. However, at the moment that information does not have a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. Could you please add a suitable source for this information, otherwise it will have to be removed. Forum posts, etc., are not acceptable. Cheers.  +++$+++ Thanks for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jaws_2&curid=352795&diff=181404665&oldid=178844103 your addition] to [[Jaws 2]]. However, at the moment that information does not have a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. Could you please add a suitable source for this information, otherwise it will have to be removed. Forum posts, etc., are not acceptable. Cheers. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
2675 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2674 +++$+++ 2674 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.199255340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply :) Since we don't have a reliable source, I've removed it. It's classed as a '[[WP:GA|good article]]' so it's important to maintain standards of verifiability. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your reply :) Since we don't have a reliable source, I've removed it. It's classed as a '[[WP:GA|good article]]' so it's important to maintain standards of verifiability. Cheers. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

526963 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526963 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-15 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.200412260E09 +++$+++ Hey ERcheck, thanks for your note.  I'm not sure this sandbox effort is going anywhere, I had one note from Melanie a couple of weeks back and she's made no edits since Dec 14.  I'm tempted to leave her one last notification of deletion, wait a few days, then blow the sucker away.  What do you reckon?  +++$+++ Hey ERcheck, thanks for your note.  I'm not sure this sandbox effort is going anywhere, I had one note from Melanie a couple of weeks back and she's made no edits since Dec 14.  I'm tempted to leave her one last notification of deletion, wait a few days, then blow the sucker away.  What do you reckon? [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 07:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
526964 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526963 +++$+++ 526963 +++$+++ 2008-01-16 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.200495660E09 +++$+++ I'll give her a deadline later on today.  Can't say we didn't try!  +++$+++ :I'll give her a deadline later on today.  Can't say we didn't try! [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 07:01, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
526965 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526963 +++$+++ 526964 +++$+++ 2008-01-23 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.201135740E09 +++$+++ Deadline passed, sandbox deleted, note left.  Good luck and good editing!   +++$+++ ::Deadline passed, sandbox deleted, note left.  Good luck and good editing!  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 16:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

264822 +++$+++ Ynhockey +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-25 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.206503220E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've reverted your edit to [[Haim Laskov]]. The article [[PPE]] is a disambiguation page and misleads the reader. Wikipedia guidelines dictate that there should be no links to disambiguation pages from articles except in hatnotes, see also, and other special cases. I have also realized that my version was broken because of a line break (accidential), which I've fixed. --  +++$+++ Hi, I've reverted your edit to [[Haim Laskov]]. The article [[PPE]] is a disambiguation page and misleads the reader. Wikipedia guidelines dictate that there should be no links to disambiguation pages from articles except in hatnotes, see also, and other special cases. I have also realized that my version was broken because of a line break (accidential), which I've fixed. -- [[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] <sup>([[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]])</sup> 20:47, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
264823 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264822 +++$+++ 264822 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.206504000E09 +++$+++ You were absolutely right in doing so. No problem, mate. Perhaps next time I ought to delve deeper. :-)   +++$+++ : You were absolutely right in doing so. No problem, mate. Perhaps next time I ought to delve deeper. :-)  [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] ([[User talk:Ekki01#top|talk]]) 21:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

2680 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.203165480E09 +++$+++ I'd recommend against it now, but please contact me if you decide to do so. <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ I'd recommend against it now, but please contact me if you decide to do so. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 04:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
2681 +++$+++ Eurocopter tigre +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2680 +++$+++ 2680 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.203386400E09 +++$+++ The February 2008 [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] election has begun.  We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates.  Please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Coordinators\/February 2008|vote here]] by February 28! -- +++$+++ :The February 2008 [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] election has begun.  We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates.  Please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/February 2008|vote here]] by February 28! --[[User:Eurocopter tigre|Eurocopter tigre]] ([[User talk:Eurocopter tigre|talk]]) 18:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

481044 +++$+++ Thegreatdr +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-08 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.149752700E09 +++$+++ Holy smokes.  The name of every named cyclone that ever existed?  Is that what you're asking?  Would this include names that were never used?  I know someone who may have the latter, actually.  Otherwise, the HURDAT for the Atlantic and Pacific east of the Dateline could probably be run through a simple Perl program to extract the names.  The WestPac would be a bit more complex since there are several warning centers that have named tropical cyclones over the past 56 or so years.  There is a HURDAT-like file from JTWC as well, and probably similar files from JMA, PAGASA, and Australia.  Sounds like a large project, actually.  I'd likely have to search the same way you would for most of that information.  Give me a couple days and I'll see if I can easily find something relevant.   +++$+++ Holy smokes.  The name of every named cyclone that ever existed?  Is that what you're asking?  Would this include names that were never used?  I know someone who may have the latter, actually.  Otherwise, the HURDAT for the Atlantic and Pacific east of the Dateline could probably be run through a simple Perl program to extract the names.  The WestPac would be a bit more complex since there are several warning centers that have named tropical cyclones over the past 56 or so years.  There is a HURDAT-like file from JTWC as well, and probably similar files from JMA, PAGASA, and Australia.  Sounds like a large project, actually.  I'd likely have to search the same way you would for most of that information.  Give me a couple days and I'll see if I can easily find something relevant.  [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] 00:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
481045 +++$+++ Thegreatdr +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481044 +++$+++ 481044 +++$+++ 2006-06-08 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.149820800E09 +++$+++ As far as I know, those amounts are correct for Reunion.  The island has a bit of elevation, and systems in the South Indian Ocean and Southwest Pacific don't move very fast.  +++$+++ :As far as I know, those amounts are correct for Reunion.  The island has a bit of elevation, and systems in the South Indian Ocean and Southwest Pacific don't move very fast. [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] 19:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
481046 +++$+++ Thegreatdr +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481044 +++$+++ 481044 +++$+++ 2006-06-09 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.149909660E09 +++$+++ Added the missing names for the 1950s and 1960s, renamed the page per the discussion page, and added additional wikilinks to in-house articles.   +++$+++ :Added the missing names for the 1950s and 1960s, renamed the page per the discussion page, and added additional wikilinks to in-house articles.  [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] 20:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

2682 +++$+++ 209.212.28.50 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-07 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.204933860E09 +++$+++ Just to drop you a quick note to inform you that a new and improved version of Boeing B-29 Survivors has been posted over the last effort - Simular in scope closer to my P-40\/B-25 Survivors series - still I have to go back and brink the version-1 of Republic P-47 Survivors to the version-4 format think you will like it.  Have you done any work on the Lockheed Constellation survivors??  If not, going to start one soon[[Special:Contributions\/209.212.28.50|209.212.28.50]] ( +++$+++ Just to drop you a quick note to inform you that a new and improved version of Boeing B-29 Survivors has been posted over the last effort - Simular in scope closer to my P-40/B-25 Survivors series - still I have to go back and brink the version-1 of Republic P-47 Survivors to the version-4 format think you will like it.  Have you done any work on the Lockheed Constellation survivors??  If not, going to start one soon[[Special:Contributions/209.212.28.50|209.212.28.50]] ([[User talk:209.212.28.50|talk]]) 15:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
2683 +++$+++ Davegnz +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2682 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-07 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.204933980E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that the above was from  +++$+++ ::Sorry about that the above was from [[User:Davegnz|Davegnz]] ([[User talk:Davegnz|talk]]) 15:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

526974 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-09 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.202629500E09 +++$+++ It seems the [[22nd MEU]] page has picked up a somewhat persistent vandal.  Hope all is well.-- +++$+++ It seems the [[22nd MEU]] page has picked up a somewhat persistent vandal.  Hope all is well.--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] ([[User talk:Looper5920|talk]]) 23:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
526975 +++$+++ 205.110.147.6 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526974 +++$+++ 526974 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.202976300E09 +++$+++ One that was just created that needs to be deleted as a promo page and non-notable  [[M. Zachary Sherman]].  --[[Special:Contributions\/205.110.147.6|205.110.147.6]] ( +++$+++ * One that was just created that needs to be deleted as a promo page and non-notable  [[M. Zachary Sherman]].  --[[Special:Contributions/205.110.147.6|205.110.147.6]] ([[User talk:205.110.147.6|talk]]) 00:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

2688 +++$+++ Ian Dunster +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-30 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.217469840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message on my talk page. I'll pop back every now and then just to fix a few links and stuff. Regards  +++$+++ Thanks for the message on my talk page. I'll pop back every now and then just to fix a few links and stuff. Regards [[User:Ian Dunster|Ian Dunster]] ([[User talk:Ian Dunster|talk]]) 19:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
2689 +++$+++ Ian Dunster +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2688 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-08-20 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.219246320E09 +++$+++ I thought the Alkemade story was an interesting 'incident'. I think the US-bias is probably inevitable as the information was much more readily available 'across the pond' until recently. The article's looking pretty good BTW.  +++$+++ ::I thought the Alkemade story was an interesting 'incident'. I think the US-bias is probably inevitable as the information was much more readily available 'across the pond' until recently. The article's looking pretty good BTW. [[User:Ian Dunster|Ian Dunster]] ([[User talk:Ian Dunster|talk]]) 08:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

2690 +++$+++ Signaleer +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-31 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.217545800E09 +++$+++ Your edit to the [[B-17 Flying Fortress]] article in reference to the '''XB-17''' was done so unknowingly.  The reference for the XB-17 is taken straight from the National Museum of the United States Air Force.  http:\/\/www.nationalmuseum.af.mil\/factsheets\/factsheet.asp?id=2488 - +++$+++ Your edit to the [[B-17 Flying Fortress]] article in reference to the '''XB-17''' was done so unknowingly.  The reference for the XB-17 is taken straight from the National Museum of the United States Air Force.  http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2488 -[[User:Signaleer|Signaleer]] ([[User talk:Signaleer|talk]]) 16:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
2691 +++$+++ Rogerd +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2690 +++$+++ 2690 +++$+++ 2008-08-01 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.217623980E09 +++$+++ Mark, I saw your response on Signaleer's talk page.  I suggest that you contact the [[NMUSAF]] and bring this to their attention.  They are very open to feedback and are interested in historical accuracy.  They have a [http:\/\/www.nationalmuseum.af.mil\/blog\/index.asp blog] where you can communicate with them.  -- +++$+++ :Mark, I saw your response on Signaleer's talk page.  I suggest that you contact the [[NMUSAF]] and bring this to their attention.  They are very open to feedback and are interested in historical accuracy.  They have a [http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/blog/index.asp blog] where you can communicate with them.  --[[User:Rogerd|rogerd]] ([[User talk:Rogerd|talk]]) 13:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
2692 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2690 +++$+++ 2691 +++$+++ 2008-08-01 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.217627160E09 +++$+++ Thanx!  I have done so! [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 14:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ :: Thanx!  I have done so! [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 14:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 14:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

526980 +++$+++ Doug +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.202903700E09 +++$+++ You referred to this edit [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion\/Eternal-Entropy\/EternalEntropyWiki\/Levels of Belief in a Statement]] as \"Speedy Delete\" which is an unusual (though probably warranted in this case) resolution for a malformed nomination.  Are you planning to actually delete the malformed nom subpage?  Or did you really mean \"Speedy Close\" (in this case I guess you can't really call it a \"Speedy Keep\" since it was never really nominated).  If you're not going to delete the nomination page we should probably close it out on the nomination subpage with a \"Speedy Close\/Malformed Nomination\" or something to that effect together with the mfd header and footer and move it to the log rather than just leave it out there hanging.  I realize you only removed it an hour ago, I just wanted to jump on it before it gets forgotten as sometimes happens.  My opinion is that we actually delete the nomination page, under G6\/common sense.  Thanks.-- +++$+++ You referred to this edit [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Eternal-Entropy/EternalEntropyWiki/Levels of Belief in a Statement]] as "Speedy Delete" which is an unusual (though probably warranted in this case) resolution for a malformed nomination.  Are you planning to actually delete the malformed nom subpage?  Or did you really mean "Speedy Close" (in this case I guess you can't really call it a "Speedy Keep" since it was never really nominated).  If you're not going to delete the nomination page we should probably close it out on the nomination subpage with a "Speedy Close/Malformed Nomination" or something to that effect together with the mfd header and footer and move it to the log rather than just leave it out there hanging.  I realize you only removed it an hour ago, I just wanted to jump on it before it gets forgotten as sometimes happens.  My opinion is that we actually delete the nomination page, under G6/common sense.  Thanks.--[[User:Doug|Doug.]]<sup>([[User talk:Doug|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Doug|contribs]])</sup> 03:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
526981 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526980 +++$+++ 526980 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.202985600E09 +++$+++ Actually, when I saw this on MFD, it had already been speedy deleted by another admin.  The addition to MFD had not been loaded properly\/not really nominated -- which was a moot point when I found it, since it had already been deleted -- which negated the need to go through MFD. So, there was no decision via the MFD for speedy delete - my edit comment was to indicate why I deleted the residual \"nomination\". From what I could find - that nomination page had also already been deleted. Hope that makes sense. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Actually, when I saw this on MFD, it had already been speedy deleted by another admin.  The addition to MFD had not been loaded properly/not really nominated -- which was a moot point when I found it, since it had already been deleted -- which negated the need to go through MFD. So, there was no decision via the MFD for speedy delete - my edit comment was to indicate why I deleted the residual "nomination". From what I could find - that nomination page had also already been deleted. Hope that makes sense. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 02:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

2693 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2693 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-01 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.217597640E09 +++$+++ So, I hold that the National Museum of the USAF's useage of the XB-17 designation is just the self-perpetuating myth mentioned above. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette|talk]]) 06:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ So, I hold that the National Museum of the USAF's useage of the XB-17 designation is just the self-perpetuating myth mentioned above. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette|talk]]) 06:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette|talk]]) 06:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
2694 +++$+++ Signaleer +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2693 +++$+++ 2693 +++$+++ 2008-08-01 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.217623440E09 +++$+++ The National Museum of the United States Air Force is a reliable source and the usage of the term '''XB-17''' will stay unless changed otherwise by the USAF. - +++$+++ :The National Museum of the United States Air Force is a reliable source and the usage of the term '''XB-17''' will stay unless changed otherwise by the USAF. -[[User:Signaleer|Signaleer]] ([[User talk:Signaleer|talk]]) 13:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
2695 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2693 +++$+++ 2694 +++$+++ 2008-08-01 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.217624460E09 +++$+++ \"They is none so blind as them that will not see.\" [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette|talk]]) 14:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ ::"They is none so blind as them that will not see." [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette|talk]]) 14:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette|talk]]) 14:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

526982 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.202968260E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 21:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
526983 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526982 +++$+++ 526982 +++$+++ 2008-02-17 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.203239100E09 +++$+++ Under new guidelines, deletion is appropriate.  Not used as critical commentary. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Under new guidelines, deletion is appropriate.  Not used as critical commentary. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 01:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

264840 +++$+++ BF +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264840 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-29 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.112090100E09 +++$+++ I accept your style Lumos now that only some great lines were left I wrote originally remain. It is *your* article now. This is only about tastes and preferences. When I began the article you weren't here. I am happy you guard [[New Age]] and I hope you read all the old talk archives, so you can understand what happened from the beginnings. As far as citing, I will ask that the citing source be able to find the exact article cited, back in time. When someone happens to check the cited source and click onto Wiki, a history link showing the article 'at the time' would be helpful someplace within the article so the curious reader will see the state in history and understand why it was worth citing.  +++$+++ I accept your style Lumos now that only some great lines were left I wrote originally remain. It is *your* article now. This is only about tastes and preferences. When I began the article you weren't here. I am happy you guard [[New Age]] and I hope you read all the old talk archives, so you can understand what happened from the beginnings. As far as citing, I will ask that the citing source be able to find the exact article cited, back in time. When someone happens to check the cited source and click onto Wiki, a history link showing the article 'at the time' would be helpful someplace within the article so the curious reader will see the state in history and understand why it was worth citing. [[User:BF|BF]] 01:55, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
264841 +++$+++ John Gohde +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264840 +++$+++ 264840 +++$+++ 2005-02-16 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.108597260E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ :-- [[User:John Gohde|John Gohde]] 15:41, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

2697 +++$+++ MilborneOne +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2697 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-20 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.219250040E09 +++$+++ Good work on the article Mark I will try and add what I can. I do notice that some entries have histories, construction numbers and previous identies of aircraft which in my opinion may be a bit to much for the general reader who may be put off by all the acronyms and fine detail. Agree that combat losses should not be included, a discussion on a notability criteria was started but I dont think a final concensus was agreed on. Bit wary of that there is a lot of fast jet crashes that could be added, just looking at a long list of F-100 losses in Europe, most of which are not really notable.  +++$+++ Good work on the article Mark I will try and add what I can. I do notice that some entries have histories, construction numbers and previous identies of aircraft which in my opinion may be a bit to much for the general reader who may be put off by all the acronyms and fine detail. Agree that combat losses should not be included, a discussion on a notability criteria was started but I dont think a final concensus was agreed on. Bit wary of that there is a lot of fast jet crashes that could be added, just looking at a long list of F-100 losses in Europe, most of which are not really notable. [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 09:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
2698 +++$+++ MilborneOne +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2697 +++$+++ 2697 +++$+++ 2008-08-20 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.219252920E09 +++$+++ Dont have a problem with the work you have done just a bit concerned that a lot of accidents could be added in the future, but if we keep an I on it I am sure it will be alright for the time being. I still have a problem with listing construction numbers or MSNs and previous identites in what is a list in a general encyclopedia but  these minor problems at the moment perhaps if this is the only mention they should be put into supplementary notes so they are not lost as reference material. Just like to say again you have done good work on the article.  +++$+++ :Dont have a problem with the work you have done just a bit concerned that a lot of accidents could be added in the future, but if we keep an I on it I am sure it will be alright for the time being. I still have a problem with listing construction numbers or MSNs and previous identites in what is a list in a general encyclopedia but  these minor problems at the moment perhaps if this is the only mention they should be put into supplementary notes so they are not lost as reference material. Just like to say again you have done good work on the article. [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 10:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
2699 +++$+++ MilborneOne +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2697 +++$+++ 2698 +++$+++ 2008-08-20 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.219254060E09 +++$+++ Just an idea Mark see what you think to the edit in 1943 - revert if you dont like it just trying to make it more readable to general readers.  +++$+++ ::Just an idea Mark see what you think to the edit in 1943 - revert if you dont like it just trying to make it more readable to general readers. [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 10:41, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
2700 +++$+++ MilborneOne +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2697 +++$+++ 2697 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.219443300E09 +++$+++ Support breaking it down into smaller articles - perhaps we could leave [[List of accidents and incidents involving military aircraft]] to cover post 2000 and then link to [[Accidents and incidents involving military aircraft 1900-1949]] and [[Accidents and incidents involving military aircraft 1950-1999]]. Suggest dropping the list part of the title because in most instances the entries do not have a linked article (unlike the commercial list) and this may allow us to include more content to be included in the future.  +++$+++ :Support breaking it down into smaller articles - perhaps we could leave [[List of accidents and incidents involving military aircraft]] to cover post 2000 and then link to [[Accidents and incidents involving military aircraft 1900-1949]] and [[Accidents and incidents involving military aircraft 1950-1999]]. Suggest dropping the list part of the title because in most instances the entries do not have a linked article (unlike the commercial list) and this may allow us to include more content to be included in the future. [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 15:15, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
2701 +++$+++ Ian Dunster +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2697 +++$+++ 2700 +++$+++ 2008-08-23 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.219529940E09 +++$+++ I don't have a problem with including serials, BuNo's etc., as although they may be irrelevant to the general reader there will be plenty of more knowledgeable ones who will find the extra information useful. They also help distinguish between a number of crashes involving the same type of aircraft. The page split seems fine BTW.  +++$+++ ::I don't have a problem with including serials, BuNo's etc., as although they may be irrelevant to the general reader there will be plenty of more knowledgeable ones who will find the extra information useful. They also help distinguish between a number of crashes involving the same type of aircraft. The page split seems fine BTW. [[User:Ian Dunster|Ian Dunster]] ([[User talk:Ian Dunster|talk]]) 15:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

264843 +++$+++ Goethean +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264843 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-14 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.121405820E09 +++$+++ Why are you removing the Integral theory template from every article?  -- +++$+++ Why are you removing the Integral theory template from every article?  --[[User:Goethean|goethean]] <big>&#2384;</big> 22:37, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
264844 +++$+++ Goethean +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264843 +++$+++ 264843 +++$+++ 2005-07-15 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.121463540E09 +++$+++ Untrue &mdash; as you undoubtedly know, the use of templates as panels of links is a common Wikipedia custom. -- +++$+++ :Untrue &mdash; as you undoubtedly know, the use of templates as panels of links is a common Wikipedia custom. --[[User:Goethean|goethean]] <big>&#2384;</big> 14:39, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
264845 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264843 +++$+++ 264844 +++$+++ 2005-07-16 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.121542680E09 +++$+++ Yes I do know this, and  its not the use of a box of related links that I object to but its position at the head of the articles. There is clear guidance on this at [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#\"See also\" and \"Related topics\" sections]]. I have placed the boxes within these sections where they are most appropriate. A quick tour of [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article\/July 2005|wikipedia featured articles]] will show that this convention is universally adhered to.  +++$+++ :: Yes I do know this, and  its not the use of a box of related links that I object to but its position at the head of the articles. There is clear guidance on this at [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#"See also" and "Related topics" sections]]. I have placed the boxes within these sections where they are most appropriate. A quick tour of [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 2005|wikipedia featured articles]] will show that this convention is universally adhered to. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 12:38, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

526988 +++$+++ Maria202 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-23 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.203829260E09 +++$+++ I was working on the album page for \"All Is Well\" and typed the title into the search box.  It redirects to the album \"The Silver Lining\". If you use a lower case 'i' in the word 'is' it works correctly.  I don't know where or how to fix it.   +++$+++ I was working on the album page for "All Is Well" and typed the title into the search box.  It redirects to the album "The Silver Lining". If you use a lower case 'i' in the word 'is' it works correctly.  I don't know where or how to fix it.  [[User:Maria202|Maria202]] ([[User talk:Maria202|talk]]) 21:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
526989 +++$+++ Maria202 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526988 +++$+++ 526988 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.203835260E09 +++$+++ Thoughts?  Aside from being lost? I guess I can figure out how to set up a dab page. \"Is\" in the album title is capitalized both on the liner notes and the CD. Will that fix the redirect? Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thoughts?  Aside from being lost? I guess I can figure out how to set up a dab page. "Is" in the album title is capitalized both on the liner notes and the CD. Will that fix the redirect? Thanks. [[User:Maria202|Maria202]] ([[User talk:Maria202|talk]]) 22:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

526991 +++$+++ Maria202 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-25 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.203986940E09 +++$+++ Me again.  I was updating the leadin paragraph for the Clay Aiken aritcle and checked the link for [[Sir Robin]]. This character article has been redirected back to the Spamalot article.  It's the only character this was done to.  See these two links [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Whatlinkshere\/Sir_Robin]] and [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sir_Robin&diff=prev&oldid=193493226]]. See also [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sir_Robin&action=history]], the Dec. 14th revision date and the Jan. 19th revision date.  Could you take a look please and see what's going on?  Thanks -  +++$+++ Me again.  I was updating the leadin paragraph for the Clay Aiken aritcle and checked the link for [[Sir Robin]]. This character article has been redirected back to the Spamalot article.  It's the only character this was done to.  See these two links [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/Sir_Robin]] and [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sir_Robin&diff=prev&oldid=193493226]]. See also [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sir_Robin&action=history]], the Dec. 14th revision date and the Jan. 19th revision date.  Could you take a look please and see what's going on?  Thanks - [[User:Maria202|Maria202]] ([[User talk:Maria202|talk]]) 16:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
526992 +++$+++ Maria202 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526991 +++$+++ 526991 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.204081680E09 +++$+++ All I knew about the fictional characters came from reading Wikipedia a few months back so I was curious why the one article with the character description was no longer there. I don't know enough about them to get involved nor did I realize there were guidelines addressing when or when not to write about them. Appreciate your help in finding the answer to my question.  +++$+++ :All I knew about the fictional characters came from reading Wikipedia a few months back so I was curious why the one article with the character description was no longer there. I don't know enough about them to get involved nor did I realize there were guidelines addressing when or when not to write about them. Appreciate your help in finding the answer to my question. [[User:Maria202|Maria202]] ([[User talk:Maria202|talk]]) 19:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

2704 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-22 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.227364620E09 +++$+++ ...amazingly I knew you all along. That's pretty funny. Do me a huge favor and don't ever mention my real name on here. Anonymity has its advantages. <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ ...amazingly I knew you all along. That's pretty funny. Do me a huge favor and don't ever mention my real name on here. Anonymity has its advantages. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 06:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
2705 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.227364620E09 +++$+++ Keep watching for those hover dogs though... <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ ::Keep watching for those hover dogs though... <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 06:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

87832 +++$+++ Decora +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-19 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.298116500E09 +++$+++ that is awesome  +++$+++ that is awesome [[User:Decora|Decora]] ([[User talk:Decora|talk]]) 03:55, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
87833 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87832 +++$+++ 87832 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.298117940E09 +++$+++ Yes!  He was quite a talent.   +++$+++ :Yes!  He was quite a talent.  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 04:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
87834 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87832 +++$+++ 87832 +++$+++ 2011-02-23 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.298500680E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I was merely following your lead.   +++$+++ :Thanks.  I was merely following your lead.  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 14:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
87835 +++$+++ Zuggernaut +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87832 +++$+++ 87834 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.298542860E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. I am glad I could help.  +++$+++ ::You are welcome. I am glad I could help. [[User:Zuggernaut|Zuggernaut]] ([[User talk:Zuggernaut|talk]]) 02:21, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

262595 +++$+++ VegaDark +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262595 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-21 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.161452880E09 +++$+++ I looked at the examples you gave and I wouldn't be opposed to putting it in chart form, but I'm not sure what the columns could be that would fit for every person currently on the list.  I also don't know how hard it would be to try and implement pictures in a list in chart form, it would look kind of akward if only a few people had pictures below their name in the chart rather than a few off to the side like it currently is.  For citations it looks like it could get interesting no matter what route I choose, I'll have to spend some time fiddling with that.  Thanks,  +++$+++ I looked at the examples you gave and I wouldn't be opposed to putting it in chart form, but I'm not sure what the columns could be that would fit for every person currently on the list.  I also don't know how hard it would be to try and implement pictures in a list in chart form, it would look kind of akward if only a few people had pictures below their name in the chart rather than a few off to the side like it currently is.  For citations it looks like it could get interesting no matter what route I choose, I'll have to spend some time fiddling with that.  Thanks, [[User:VegaDark|VegaDark]] 10:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
262596 +++$+++ VegaDark +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262595 +++$+++ 262595 +++$+++ 2006-10-22 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.161508920E09 +++$+++ I've made a start to putting the list in chart form at [[User:VegaDark\/Sandbox]].  Can you think of any other columns to add?  +++$+++ :I've made a start to putting the list in chart form at [[User:VegaDark/Sandbox]].  Can you think of any other columns to add? [[User:VegaDark|VegaDark]] 02:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
262597 +++$+++ VegaDark +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262595 +++$+++ 262596 +++$+++ 2006-10-22 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.161571200E09 +++$+++ I was considering adding a birth\/death column but I didn't consider it to be really related to the topic of the list, whereas in lists of people with medical conditions it is something a lot more likely someone would want the info on.  I was also considering adding a degree column, but I realized that I don't have the info on that for 99% of the people on the list, so I decided against it.  As for why there are so many sportspeople, I guess you could say it's because OSU has been running sports for a long time and people have a higher chance of becoming notable via that route than academically or otherwise.  +++$+++ ::I was considering adding a birth/death column but I didn't consider it to be really related to the topic of the list, whereas in lists of people with medical conditions it is something a lot more likely someone would want the info on.  I was also considering adding a degree column, but I realized that I don't have the info on that for 99% of the people on the list, so I decided against it.  As for why there are so many sportspeople, I guess you could say it's because OSU has been running sports for a long time and people have a higher chance of becoming notable via that route than academically or otherwise. [[User:VegaDark|VegaDark]] 19:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

526996 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526996 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-01 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.204420200E09 +++$+++ I'm guessing you were being sincere, and not sarcastic, in your comment on my talk page. I just figured that since it hadn't been updated in Feb, the usual suspects weren't out and about to make the change. Otherwise, I would have discussed it a bit first. Let me know if you have any thoughts on what I selected. ''' +++$+++ I'm guessing you were being sincere, and not sarcastic, in your comment on my talk page. I just figured that since it hadn't been updated in Feb, the usual suspects weren't out and about to make the change. Otherwise, I would have discussed it a bit first. Let me know if you have any thoughts on what I selected. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]] 17:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
526997 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526996 +++$+++ 526996 +++$+++ 2008-03-01 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.204421700E09 +++$+++ I'd love to say yes, but I'm sorry to say I'm not very dependable for time-specific edits. I don't always have reliable internet connection\/computer access, and when I do, my wife hogs it to mess around on Myspace. But I would love to be involved as much as possible (I figure we can post some ideas and suggestions in the portal talk a few days beforehand, and that greatly increases the chances that I will have some time to edit before the 1st of the month). What did you have in mind? We can use it for April. ''' +++$+++ :I'd love to say yes, but I'm sorry to say I'm not very dependable for time-specific edits. I don't always have reliable internet connection/computer access, and when I do, my wife hogs it to mess around on Myspace. But I would love to be involved as much as possible (I figure we can post some ideas and suggestions in the portal talk a few days beforehand, and that greatly increases the chances that I will have some time to edit before the 1st of the month). What did you have in mind? We can use it for April. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]] 17:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
526998 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526996 +++$+++ 526997 +++$+++ 2008-03-01 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.204431360E09 +++$+++ Also, I don't really know what I could do with the good [[Presley O'Bannon|Lieutenant]]'s article. I just don't know what makes him significant outside of his role at Tripoli. ''' +++$+++ ::Also, I don't really know what I could do with the good [[Presley O'Bannon|Lieutenant]]'s article. I just don't know what makes him significant outside of his role at Tripoli. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]] 20:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

568430 +++$+++ JoaoRicardo +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-17 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.150612320E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I noticed you closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/November 22, 1963|this article's AfD]] with the \"redirect\" result. However, from 6 votes, 3 asked for the redirect to be created, and 3 asked for the deletion. Sorry for asking, but did I miss something? I thought policy asked for further discussion in these cases.  +++$+++ Hi there. I noticed you closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/November 22, 1963|this article's AfD]] with the "redirect" result. However, from 6 votes, 3 asked for the redirect to be created, and 3 asked for the deletion. Sorry for asking, but did I miss something? I thought policy asked for further discussion in these cases. [[User:JoaoRicardo|JoaoRicardo]]<sup>[[User talk:JoaoRicardo|talk]] </sup> 23:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
568431 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568430 +++$+++ 568430 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.150642560E09 +++$+++ Hello! I used [[Rough consensus]] from the [[Wikipedia:Deletion_guidelines_for_administrators#Rough_consensus|Admin deletion guidelines]] as my guide.  Looking at the results, the debate was either to delete the page or to convert it in to a redirect - nobody wanted to keep the material.  As I had participated in the discussion, I looked again at the nature of the page and the debate on AfD to determine which course of action to take.  I took the view that the author was clearly looking to discuss the Kennedy assassination but had failed to do so in an adequate manner.  Whilst I agree with [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki's]] comment that other important events aren't described in articles titled according to the date of the event, I thought that this date would be significant for the most recent three-or-four generations of Wikipedia users. Because of this, a redirect appeared to be an easier option than a deletion and with my change of mind a rough consensus was achieved, hence the decision. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :Hello! I used [[Rough consensus]] from the [[Wikipedia:Deletion_guidelines_for_administrators#Rough_consensus|Admin deletion guidelines]] as my guide.  Looking at the results, the debate was either to delete the page or to convert it in to a redirect - nobody wanted to keep the material.  As I had participated in the discussion, I looked again at the nature of the page and the debate on AfD to determine which course of action to take.  I took the view that the author was clearly looking to discuss the Kennedy assassination but had failed to do so in an adequate manner.  Whilst I agree with [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki's]] comment that other important events aren't described in articles titled according to the date of the event, I thought that this date would be significant for the most recent three-or-four generations of Wikipedia users. Because of this, a redirect appeared to be an easier option than a deletion and with my change of mind a rough consensus was achieved, hence the decision. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 07:56, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
568432 +++$+++ JoaoRicardo +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568430 +++$+++ 568431 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.150679460E09 +++$+++ Ok, I understand your position now. Thank you for clarifying me. :)  +++$+++ ::Ok, I understand your position now. Thank you for clarifying me. :) [[User:JoaoRicardo|JoaoRicardo]]<sup>[[User talk:JoaoRicardo|talk]] </sup> 18:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
568433 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568430 +++$+++ 568430 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.150690980E09 +++$+++ That's fine.  Bear in mind the copyvio comments; the notable status of the institution is not in dispute. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :That's fine.  Bear in mind the copyvio comments; the notable status of the institution is not in dispute. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 21:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

2710 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-13 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.231910040E09 +++$+++ Did you see the picture of the crash? [http:\/\/img.thesun.co.uk\/multimedia\/archive\/00707\/blackhawkdown_1__68_707634a.jpg A few people got pictures as it went down]. <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ Did you see the picture of the crash? [http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00707/blackhawkdown_1__68_707634a.jpg A few people got pictures as it went down]. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 21:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
2711 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2710 +++$+++ 2710 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.231910400E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.kbtx.com\/home\/headlines\/37510709.html The young man killed was indeed the recent grad]. :-( <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ :[http://www.kbtx.com/home/headlines/37510709.html The young man killed was indeed the recent grad]. :-( <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 21:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

527001 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.204759920E09 +++$+++ Thoughts? ''' +++$+++ Thoughts? '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]] 15:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
527002 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527001 +++$+++ 527001 +++$+++ 2008-03-06 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.204794840E09 +++$+++ Jones' quote, while related to Guadalcanal, isn't specifically related to the Marine Corps.  Marine Corps related-quotes naturally are given preference. On images, if there are others that you want to be considered, just post them in the image gallery.  I've been considering the Guadalcanal image you indicated.  &mdash;  +++$+++ :Jones' quote, while related to Guadalcanal, isn't specifically related to the Marine Corps.  Marine Corps related-quotes naturally are given preference. On images, if there are others that you want to be considered, just post them in the image gallery.  I've been considering the Guadalcanal image you indicated.  &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 01:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

2714 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-01 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.238575020E09 +++$+++ Hi. You [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Hainan_Island_incident&diff=271516198&oldid=271515979 indicated] that the lead image is copyright. Where did you get this info from? -- +++$+++ Hi. You [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hainan_Island_incident&diff=271516198&oldid=271515979 indicated] that the lead image is copyright. Where did you get this info from? --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 01:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
2715 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2714 +++$+++ 2714 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.238575200E09 +++$+++ This is the way Air Forces Monthly credited the EP-3E photo when they ran it. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette|talk]]) 01:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ :This is the way Air Forces Monthly credited the EP-3E photo when they ran it. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette|talk]]) 01:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette|talk]]) 01:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
2716 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2714 +++$+++ 2715 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.238575560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the fast response. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the fast response. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 01:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
2717 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2714 +++$+++ 2716 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.238583660E09 +++$+++ It's been nominated for deletion on Commons and I have removed it from the article. It may be that we can keep it under fair use, and if a consensus develops at article talk I think we could go down this road. Thanks again. -- +++$+++ :::It's been nominated for deletion on Commons and I have removed it from the article. It may be that we can keep it under fair use, and if a consensus develops at article talk I think we could go down this road. Thanks again. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 04:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
2718 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2714 +++$+++ 2717 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.238618520E09 +++$+++ I make no claim over the pic - I just reported the sourcing after I found it in the AFM cutline. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 13:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ ::::I make no claim over the pic - I just reported the sourcing after I found it in the AFM cutline. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 13:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 13:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

527003 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527003 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-08 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.205012340E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 13:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
527004 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527003 +++$+++ 527003 +++$+++ 2008-03-08 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.205049000E09 +++$+++ Rationale provided for logo uploaded in 2005, prior to current requirements for details of fair use. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Rationale provided for logo uploaded in 2005, prior to current requirements for details of fair use. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 23:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

264860 +++$+++ Folks at 137 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-05 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.136494920E09 +++$+++ I see that 62.253.219.238 has reinstated your reversion to the Hemel Hempstead article, leaving 'nearby places' as was. Now what? I've left a msg on his\/ her talk page inviting them to discuss, but.....   +++$+++ I see that 62.253.219.238 has reinstated your reversion to the Hemel Hempstead article, leaving 'nearby places' as was. Now what? I've left a msg on his/ her talk page inviting them to discuss, but.....  [[User:Folks at 137|Folks at 137]] 13:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
264861 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264860 +++$+++ 264860 +++$+++ 2006-01-05 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.136524200E09 +++$+++ I have removed it again. Please follow the Wikipedia maxim of \" Be bold\" and make changes yourselves if you think fit.  +++$+++ :I have removed it again. Please follow the Wikipedia maxim of " Be bold" and make changes yourselves if you think fit. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 21:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

527006 +++$+++ Andyvphil +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527006 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-10 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.205180820E09 +++$+++ Was going to inquire about this myself, but I see Hux beat me to it. The deletion reason you gave, G4, doesn't apply to what was originally a speedly delete[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion\/2008_February_27#Image:25campaign-obama250.jpg]. I understand Hux fixed G12, and there is an ongoing discussion about including the image [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Barack_Obama_presidential_campaign%2C_2008#somali_pic_redux], so... maybe you were premature?  +++$+++ Was going to inquire about this myself, but I see Hux beat me to it. The deletion reason you gave, G4, doesn't apply to what was originally a speedly delete[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2008_February_27#Image:25campaign-obama250.jpg]. I understand Hux fixed G12, and there is an ongoing discussion about including the image [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama_presidential_campaign%2C_2008#somali_pic_redux], so... maybe you were premature? [[User:Andyvphil|Andyvphil]] ([[User talk:Andyvphil|talk]]) 13:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
527007 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527006 +++$+++ 527006 +++$+++ 2008-03-10 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.205217300E09 +++$+++ Based on a [[Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion\/2008_February_27#Image:25campaign-obama250.jpg|MFD posted on 27 Feb 2008]], it was deleted. While it was eventually \"speedied\" as a copyright violation, that happened after a few days on MFD.  So, my deletion was not based on recreation of a speedy deleted, but rather an MFD. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Based on a [[Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2008_February_27#Image:25campaign-obama250.jpg|MFD posted on 27 Feb 2008]], it was deleted. While it was eventually "speedied" as a copyright violation, that happened after a few days on MFD.  So, my deletion was not based on recreation of a speedy deleted, but rather an MFD. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 23:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
527008 +++$+++ Hux +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527006 +++$+++ 527007 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.205249880E09 +++$+++ Right, I see that. However, the criteria on which the MFD was decided (I5 + G12) clearly no longer apply. I5 is not relevant because there is an article ready and waiting for its inclusion and G12 isn't relevant because a Fair Use rationale was given for its inclusion on that specific article in relation to a description specifically about that photo. So in other words, the conclusion of the MFD was faulty. --  +++$+++ ::Right, I see that. However, the criteria on which the MFD was decided (I5 + G12) clearly no longer apply. I5 is not relevant because there is an article ready and waiting for its inclusion and G12 isn't relevant because a Fair Use rationale was given for its inclusion on that specific article in relation to a description specifically about that photo. So in other words, the conclusion of the MFD was faulty. -- [[User:Hux|Hux]] ([[User talk:Hux|talk]]) 08:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
527009 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527006 +++$+++ 527008 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.205261100E09 +++$+++ The closing admin noted both G12 and I5.  His emphasis was on G12. Suppying fair use rationale does ''not'' automatically overcome copyright claims.  At the time of my re-deletion there was no clear consensus that fair use was appropriate &mdash; in fact, you had it as a question.  &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 11:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)  Ongoing discussion on the article's talk page also shows no consensus. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::: The closing admin noted both G12 and I5.  His emphasis was on G12. Suppying fair use rationale does ''not'' automatically overcome copyright claims.  At the time of my re-deletion there was no clear consensus that fair use was appropriate &mdash; in fact, you had it as a question.  &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 11:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)  Ongoing discussion on the article's talk page also shows no consensus. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 11:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
527010 +++$+++ Hux +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527006 +++$+++ 527009 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.205302260E09 +++$+++ If it can be shown that the image satisfies [[WP:NFCC]], would you consider restoring it? If that isn't sufficient, could you give me an idea of what would be considered sufficient? Cheers. --  +++$+++ ::::If it can be shown that the image satisfies [[WP:NFCC]], would you consider restoring it? If that isn't sufficient, could you give me an idea of what would be considered sufficient? Cheers. -- [[User:Hux|Hux]] ([[User talk:Hux|talk]]) 23:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
527011 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527006 +++$+++ 527010 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.205347800E09 +++$+++ There does not seem to be consensus on this image. If there is clear consensus, in line with Wikipedia policy, let me know and I will take a look again.  &mdash;  +++$+++ ::::: There does not seem to be consensus on this image. If there is clear consensus, in line with Wikipedia policy, let me know and I will take a look again.  &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 11:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
527012 +++$+++ Andyvphil +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527006 +++$+++ 527009 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.205389560E09 +++$+++ Since your deletion was in error, I ask that you simply reverse it. Your opinion as to whether consensus exists on the talk page is not relevant to you obligation to do so, but should you volunteer to offer it (and I would welcome your doing so) I ask that you do what [[WP:CON]] calls forn namelty that \"...finding the actual consensus (or what it will end up as [requires] carefully consider[ing] the strength and quality of the arguments themselves (including any additional concerns that may have been raised along the way), the basis of objection of those who disagree, and in more complex situations, existing documentation in the project namespace... If you are volunteering to carry out an action on the basis of rough consensus, only this thorough approach is acceptable.\"  +++$+++ ::::Since your deletion was in error, I ask that you simply reverse it. Your opinion as to whether consensus exists on the talk page is not relevant to you obligation to do so, but should you volunteer to offer it (and I would welcome your doing so) I ask that you do what [[WP:CON]] calls forn namelty that "...finding the actual consensus (or what it will end up as [requires] carefully consider[ing] the strength and quality of the arguments themselves (including any additional concerns that may have been raised along the way), the basis of objection of those who disagree, and in more complex situations, existing documentation in the project namespace... If you are volunteering to carry out an action on the basis of rough consensus, only this thorough approach is acceptable." [[User:Andyvphil|Andyvphil]] ([[User talk:Andyvphil|talk]]) 23:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
527013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527006 +++$+++ 527006 +++$+++ 2008-03-10 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.205217660E09 +++$+++ Edit summary was provided.  I reverted an insertion of false information by a vandalism-only account. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=George_Washington&diff=prev&oldid=196938216]  I did not \"delete\" content &mdash; I reverted vandalism.  Sending me a {{tl|uw-delete2}} warning is inappropriate. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Edit summary was provided.  I reverted an insertion of false information by a vandalism-only account. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Washington&diff=prev&oldid=196938216]  I did not "delete" content &mdash; I reverted vandalism.  Sending me a {{tl|uw-delete2}} warning is inappropriate. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 23:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

264863 +++$+++ Theodore7 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-12 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.137116640E09 +++$+++ Lumos, I have asked you to please use the Astrology Talk Page before your instant reverting. Today, just several minutes after I added sources, you instantly \"reverted\" back to the non-sourced page that does not have consensus - as you claim. I ask you to stop, and to either cite sources for the page you keep reverting to, or add sources. You have not done so and you are becoming the chief \"reverter.\" Please stop, and cite sources, reference materials to back up what is written on the Wiki-Astrology page. Moreover Lumos, you show little knowledge of astrology yourself, but claim that sources are not needed. I suggest you refer to Wikipedia and cease your POV reverts on this page. If you must claim, as you do, that sources are not needed, then explain yourself then as to the reason. I would be most interested in hearing your reasoning behind this since astrology can be sourced, and sources cited. Thanks. +++$+++ Lumos, I have asked you to please use the Astrology Talk Page before your instant reverting. Today, just several minutes after I added sources, you instantly "reverted" back to the non-sourced page that does not have consensus - as you claim. I ask you to stop, and to either cite sources for the page you keep reverting to, or add sources. You have not done so and you are becoming the chief "reverter." Please stop, and cite sources, reference materials to back up what is written on the Wiki-Astrology page. Moreover Lumos, you show little knowledge of astrology yourself, but claim that sources are not needed. I suggest you refer to Wikipedia and cease your POV reverts on this page. If you must claim, as you do, that sources are not needed, then explain yourself then as to the reason. I would be most interested in hearing your reasoning behind this since astrology can be sourced, and sources cited. Thanks.[[User:Theodore7|Theo]] 17:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
264864 +++$+++ R.Koot +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264863 +++$+++ 264863 +++$+++ 2006-01-12 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.137117420E09 +++$+++ Theo, please see [[hypocrisy]]. &mdash;'' +++$+++ : Theo, please see [[hypocrisy]]. &mdash;''[[User:R.Koot|Ruud]]'' 17:57, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

2721 +++$+++ Dapi89 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2721 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-24 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.243223040E09 +++$+++ Hello. Can you please provide a page number for your citation re: He 111 U please? Cheers.  +++$+++ Hello. Can you please provide a page number for your citation re: He 111 U please? Cheers. [[User:Dapi89|Dapi89]] ([[User talk:Dapi89|talk]]) 20:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
2722 +++$+++ Dapi89 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2721 +++$+++ 2721 +++$+++ 2009-05-24 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.243227600E09 +++$+++ I see it was added by Nigel ish. Thanks anyway.  +++$+++ :I see it was added by Nigel ish. Thanks anyway. [[User:Dapi89|Dapi89]] ([[User talk:Dapi89|talk]]) 22:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

264866 +++$+++ Chris Brennan +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-13 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.137162300E09 +++$+++ I'm taking steps to lodge a formal complaint against [[User:Theodore7]] due to various reasons that I'm sure that you are aware of, or have experienced by now.  Right now I have a rough draft of the complaint that I would like to have some people look over, add to, correct, and sign if they agree with it.  I've never had to do anything like this before, so if you would please take some time to take a look at it and give me some feedback, suggestions, support, etc., then I would really appreciate it.  It can be found here: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/Theodore7]  Thank you.  -- +++$+++ I'm taking steps to lodge a formal complaint against [[User:Theodore7]] due to various reasons that I'm sure that you are aware of, or have experienced by now.  Right now I have a rough draft of the complaint that I would like to have some people look over, add to, correct, and sign if they agree with it.  I've never had to do anything like this before, so if you would please take some time to take a look at it and give me some feedback, suggestions, support, etc., then I would really appreciate it.  It can be found here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Theodore7]  Thank you.  --[[User:Chris Brennan|Chris Brennan]] 06:25, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
264867 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264866 +++$+++ 264866 +++$+++ 2006-01-13 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.137172320E09 +++$+++ I support you in this and will look at it today. +++$+++ :I support you in this and will look at it today.[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 09:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

2723 +++$+++ PeterWD +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-03 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.246681860E09 +++$+++ Seeing your involvement with Eglin and accidents pages, I'm interested in discovering the serial of the A-26 Invader that crashed in the sea near Eglin on 28 April 1945 while testing Speedee (Highball) bouncing bombs. It was the only A-26 so modified, reportedly at (Vickers) Brooklands. I don't have any expertise on researching accidents, but can you offer advice on how to proceed. I've only got the Johnsen book as just cited on WP bouncing bombs page. +++$+++ Seeing your involvement with Eglin and accidents pages, I'm interested in discovering the serial of the A-26 Invader that crashed in the sea near Eglin on 28 April 1945 while testing Speedee (Highball) bouncing bombs. It was the only A-26 so modified, reportedly at (Vickers) Brooklands. I don't have any expertise on researching accidents, but can you offer advice on how to proceed. I've only got the Johnsen book as just cited on WP bouncing bombs page.[[User:PeterWD|PeterWD]] ([[User talk:PeterWD|talk]]) 21:31, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
2724 +++$+++ PeterWD +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2723 +++$+++ 2723 +++$+++ 2009-07-19 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.248024720E09 +++$+++ Update, made contact with Barnes Wallis historian Iain Murray, who offered 41-39291, enquiries continuing. +++$+++ :Update, made contact with Barnes Wallis historian Iain Murray, who offered 41-39291, enquiries continuing.[[User:PeterWD|PeterWD]] ([[User talk:PeterWD|talk]]) 10:32, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
2725 +++$+++ PeterWD +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2723 +++$+++ 2724 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.248204900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your continuing correspondence. +++$+++ ::Thanks for your continuing correspondence.[[User:PeterWD|PeterWD]] ([[User talk:PeterWD|talk]]) 12:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
2726 +++$+++ PeterWD +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2723 +++$+++ 2725 +++$+++ 2009-08-01 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.249195080E09 +++$+++ A US historian has provided details (quote) The A-26 that crashed 28 April, 1945 was 43-22644 from Wright Field. It crashed into Choctawhatchee Bay, 3 Miles Northeast of Fort Walton, FL after being struck by the bomb. It had taken off from Eglin Field on a low level bombing exercise at AAF water range #60. Ref: Mireles, Fatal Army Air Force Accidents in the United States, 1941-1945.(unquote).Email me if you want UK background or correspondence not appropriate on WP. +++$+++ :::A US historian has provided details (quote) The A-26 that crashed 28 April, 1945 was 43-22644 from Wright Field. It crashed into Choctawhatchee Bay, 3 Miles Northeast of Fort Walton, FL after being struck by the bomb. It had taken off from Eglin Field on a low level bombing exercise at AAF water range #60. Ref: Mireles, Fatal Army Air Force Accidents in the United States, 1941-1945.(unquote).Email me if you want UK background or correspondence not appropriate on WP.[[User:PeterWD|PeterWD]] ([[User talk:PeterWD|talk]]) 23:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

264870 +++$+++ InvictaHOG +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264870 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-22 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.137979980E09 +++$+++ Hi, I see that you have stumbled into the whale.to controversy. I've replied to your concerns on Fred Klenner's page, but think it's probably best to keep the rest of the conversation on the MMR Vaccine Talk page.  +++$+++ Hi, I see that you have stumbled into the whale.to controversy. I've replied to your concerns on Fred Klenner's page, but think it's probably best to keep the rest of the conversation on the MMR Vaccine Talk page. [[User:InvictaHOG|InvictaHOG]] 17:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
264871 +++$+++ Whaleto +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264870 +++$+++ 264870 +++$+++ 2006-01-27 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.138390980E09 +++$+++ I didn't really know where to put this notice.... John (Whaleto) is now adding a \"different\" link to all of his articles (ex. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wilhelm_Reich&diff=35795663&oldid=35096713]).  The link is http:\/\/www.(nospam)vaccination.org.uk, which is quite obviously a copy of the whale.to site, or a transfer of the contents to a different location.  I seem to be on his radar now, so I'll go remove all the links I can find.    --[[User:CDN99|CDN99]] 18:11, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Clinical_medicine&diff=35838157&oldid=35817024].  You have to ask what they don't want anyone to see, must be this [http:\/\/www.(nospam)vaccination.org.uk\/vaccines\/note.html].  Cheers  +++$+++ *I didn't really know where to put this notice.... John (Whaleto) is now adding a "different" link to all of his articles (ex. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wilhelm_Reich&diff=35795663&oldid=35096713]).  The link is http://www.(nospam)vaccination.org.uk, which is quite obviously a copy of the whale.to site, or a transfer of the contents to a different location.  I seem to be on his radar now, so I'll go remove all the links I can find.    --[[User:CDN99|CDN99]] 18:11, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Clinical_medicine&diff=35838157&oldid=35817024].  You have to ask what they don't want anyone to see, must be this [http://www.(nospam)vaccination.org.uk/vaccines/note.html].  Cheers [[User:Whaleto|john]] 11:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

175217 +++$+++ Nicola Romani +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-27 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.282916580E09 +++$+++ Ciao Attilio, can you see the page [[Italian Navy]] and its talk page please? I've got some problems with my last edit. Thank you in advance. -- +++$+++ Ciao Attilio, can you see the page [[Italian Navy]] and its talk page please? I've got some problems with my last edit. Thank you in advance. --[[User:Nicola Romani|Nicola Romani]] ([[User talk:Nicola Romani|talk]]) 06:43, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
175218 +++$+++ Nicola Romani +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175217 +++$+++ 175217 +++$+++ 2010-08-28 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.283015340E09 +++$+++ Now a newly user, probably a sock puppet, reverted my edit once again. -- +++$+++ :Now a newly user, probably a sock puppet, reverted my edit once again. --[[User:Nicola Romani|Nicola Romani]] ([[User talk:Nicola Romani|talk]]) 10:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

612124 +++$+++ Gurubrahma +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612124 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-12 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.134404280E09 +++$+++ Hi Dave, thanks a ton for the heads up about the rave and rant on Slashdot. That user has e-mailed me saying that he'll complain to other ''neutral'' admins. I've pointed out to him in my reply that I blocked [[User:Astriolok]] for 24 hours and [[User:Peyna]] for 3 hours (benefit of doubt). I tried replying on slashdot but there seems to be some problem with the account creation. if you think it is necessary, you may want to reply on slashdot with the fact abt others getting blocked. Sorry if I'm causing you additional work. -- +++$+++ Hi Dave, thanks a ton for the heads up about the rave and rant on Slashdot. That user has e-mailed me saying that he'll complain to other ''neutral'' admins. I've pointed out to him in my reply that I blocked [[User:Astriolok]] for 24 hours and [[User:Peyna]] for 3 hours (benefit of doubt). I tried replying on slashdot but there seems to be some problem with the account creation. if you think it is necessary, you may want to reply on slashdot with the fact abt others getting blocked. Sorry if I'm causing you additional work. --[[User:Gurubrahma|Gurubrahma]] 08:18, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
612125 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612124 +++$+++ 612124 +++$+++ 2005-12-12 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.134425640E09 +++$+++ No bother, I'll have a go but my slashdot account hasn't been logging in properly lately. ... +++$+++ :No bother, I'll have a go but my slashdot account hasn't been logging in properly lately. ...[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]] 14:14, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
612126 +++$+++ Gurubrahma +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612124 +++$+++ 612125 +++$+++ 2005-12-12 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.134425820E09 +++$+++ Thanks again!! Though he accuses me that I've blocked others after he threatened to complain, it is further from truth as all three users were blocked within 20 minutes duration of each block - I needed to establish beyond doubt that the other users were also violators - the times can be checked from the blocklogs. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks again!! Though he accuses me that I've blocked others after he threatened to complain, it is further from truth as all three users were blocked within 20 minutes duration of each block - I needed to establish beyond doubt that the other users were also violators - the times can be checked from the blocklogs. --[[User:Gurubrahma|Gurubrahma]] 14:17, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
612127 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612124 +++$+++ 612124 +++$+++ 2005-12-12 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.134427200E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. I've not tried to get into the gory details, and think that's enough feeding the troll for now... +++$+++ :Fair enough. I've not tried to get into the gory details, and think that's enough feeding the troll for now...[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]] 14:40, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

2730 +++$+++ Debresser +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-26 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.256586120E09 +++$+++ In [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_military_aircraft_(pre-1950)&diff=next&oldid=322024167 this edit] of 26 October 2009 you added a broken reference <code><nowiki><ref name=\"JewishObserver><\/nowiki><\/code> to [[List of accidents and incidents involving military aircraft (pre-1950)]]. Could you please go back and fix it? Thank you,  +++$+++ In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_military_aircraft_(pre-1950)&diff=next&oldid=322024167 this edit] of 26 October 2009 you added a broken reference <code><nowiki><ref name="JewishObserver></nowiki></code> to [[List of accidents and incidents involving military aircraft (pre-1950)]]. Could you please go back and fix it? Thank you, [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] ([[User talk:Debresser|talk]]) 12:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
2731 +++$+++ Debresser +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2730 +++$+++ 2730 +++$+++ 2009-10-26 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.256620380E09 +++$+++ I see [[user:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]] just did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_military_aircraft_(pre-1950)&diff=322195691&oldid=322026537 that].  +++$+++ : I see [[user:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]] just did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_military_aircraft_(pre-1950)&diff=322195691&oldid=322026537 that]. [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] ([[User talk:Debresser|talk]]) 22:13, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

527020 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527020 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-05 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.207433280E09 +++$+++ In the future, could you please sort Hawaii-related deletion discussions using the instructions found at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting\/Hawaii]].  Regardless of the content of this article, which I admit not having seen or having access to, the concept is a culturally-significant aspect of [[Hawaiiana]] and would qualify for any number of redirects in lieu of content.  That the article was summarily deleted without any input from the Hawaii project is indicative of core problems related to the deletion process which are upheld by a group of people who are motivated by the idea of deletion rather than that of an informed opinion. &mdash; +++$+++ In the future, could you please sort Hawaii-related deletion discussions using the instructions found at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Hawaii]].  Regardless of the content of this article, which I admit not having seen or having access to, the concept is a culturally-significant aspect of [[Hawaiiana]] and would qualify for any number of redirects in lieu of content.  That the article was summarily deleted without any input from the Hawaii project is indicative of core problems related to the deletion process which are upheld by a group of people who are motivated by the idea of deletion rather than that of an informed opinion. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 15:08, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
527021 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527020 +++$+++ 527020 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.207463100E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your thoughts.  I am not a member of WikiProject Deletion sorting. I do not find from the deletion discussion that the editors who contributed appeared to be \"motivated by the idea of deletion rather than that of an informed opinion.\" (Please [[WP:AGF|AGF]] on the part of all involved in the discussion.) The deletion discussion speaks for itself &mdash; the article was entirely unreferenced.  As you feel that it is an important aspect of related to Hawaiian culture, you seem to be in a position to write an article on the topic based on [[WP:RS|reliable sources]].  I'd be interested in reading it. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 23:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)  Addendum: If you think the AFD discussion was flawed, you are free to take it to [[WP:Deletion review]]. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Thank you for your thoughts.  I am not a member of WikiProject Deletion sorting. I do not find from the deletion discussion that the editors who contributed appeared to be "motivated by the idea of deletion rather than that of an informed opinion." (Please [[WP:AGF|AGF]] on the part of all involved in the discussion.) The deletion discussion speaks for itself &mdash; the article was entirely unreferenced.  As you feel that it is an important aspect of related to Hawaiian culture, you seem to be in a position to write an article on the topic based on [[WP:RS|reliable sources]].  I'd be interested in reading it. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 23:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)  Addendum: If you think the AFD discussion was flawed, you are free to take it to [[WP:Deletion review]]. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 23:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
527022 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527020 +++$+++ 527021 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.207463760E09 +++$+++ I  have assumed good faith, and after participating in AfD and reviewing the deletion discussions for some time, I find the entire deletion process to be unproductive and mismanaged.  As for Aloha Friday, I have the sources in front of me and I will be adding a new section to [[Aloha shirt]].  It took me approximately one minute to find reliable sources.  Even Google Books shows that the topic is covered in Gale's Multicultural Encyclopaedia.  That this article was deleted without so much as a redirect demonstrates my point about AfD.  It is  a complete failure.  I am surprised that you think you have to be a member of deletion sorting to have the common courtesy to sort your nomination appropriately so that others may participate.  One does not have to be a member of any project to help facilitate discussion.  I also question whether the original nomination was made correctly, as I see it was fixed a few hours before the discussion was closed.  I'm not sure why you would think I would want a flawed process to be reviewed by an equally broken process of DR, but I want to thank you for brightening up my day with a good laugh. &mdash; +++$+++ ::I  have assumed good faith, and after participating in AfD and reviewing the deletion discussions for some time, I find the entire deletion process to be unproductive and mismanaged.  As for Aloha Friday, I have the sources in front of me and I will be adding a new section to [[Aloha shirt]].  It took me approximately one minute to find reliable sources.  Even Google Books shows that the topic is covered in Gale's Multicultural Encyclopaedia.  That this article was deleted without so much as a redirect demonstrates my point about AfD.  It is  a complete failure.  I am surprised that you think you have to be a member of deletion sorting to have the common courtesy to sort your nomination appropriately so that others may participate.  One does not have to be a member of any project to help facilitate discussion.  I also question whether the original nomination was made correctly, as I see it was fixed a few hours before the discussion was closed.  I'm not sure why you would think I would want a flawed process to be reviewed by an equally broken process of DR, but I want to thank you for brightening up my day with a good laugh. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 23:36, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
527023 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527020 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.207463940E09 +++$+++ I don't appreciate the accusatory nature of your comments &mdash; saying that I lack common courtesy. In fact, the article was tagged for speedy deletion, and rather than summarily deleting it, I thought it better to get community input.  I did not \"vote\" for deletion &mdash; but let the community give their intput.  I did not close the discussion.  Again, I suggest you take it to DR if you would like the process reviewed.  But, it seems the better solution is for you to write the referenced article that you have information to create.   &mdash;  +++$+++ :::: I don't appreciate the accusatory nature of your comments &mdash; saying that I lack common courtesy. In fact, the article was tagged for speedy deletion, and rather than summarily deleting it, I thought it better to get community input.  I did not "vote" for deletion &mdash; but let the community give their intput.  I did not close the discussion.  Again, I suggest you take it to DR if you would like the process reviewed.  But, it seems the better solution is for you to write the referenced article that you have information to create.   &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 23:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
527024 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527020 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.207464180E09 +++$+++ What have I accused you of?  I have condemned the entire process, not any single individual.  If you are reading yourself into my comments, there is nothing I can do about that.  And, why would I want to take this to DR when I just finished telling you that I wouldn't?  Same goes for the article.  I just told you that I'm adding it as a section, not as a new article.  Are you reading what I'm saying or are you only reading what you want to read? &mdash; +++$+++ :::::What have I accused you of?  I have condemned the entire process, not any single individual.  If you are reading yourself into my comments, there is nothing I can do about that.  And, why would I want to take this to DR when I just finished telling you that I wouldn't?  Same goes for the article.  I just told you that I'm adding it as a section, not as a new article.  Are you reading what I'm saying or are you only reading what you want to read? &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 23:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
527025 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527020 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.207465080E09 +++$+++ Reviewing the AFD - I did list it under society topics.  The article that was nominated did not mention Hawaii &mdash; rather referred to it as a colloquialism in the Pacific Northwest, especially Seattle and Portland.  It was not mentioned that this was terminology used in Hawaii.  With the context of the article that was nominated, listing it under society topics seemed appropriate.  &mdash;  +++$+++ :::::: Reviewing the AFD - I did list it under society topics.  The article that was nominated did not mention Hawaii &mdash; rather referred to it as a colloquialism in the Pacific Northwest, especially Seattle and Portland.  It was not mentioned that this was terminology used in Hawaii.  With the context of the article that was nominated, listing it under society topics seemed appropriate.  &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 23:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

264878 +++$+++ Ragesoss +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-14 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.142407740E09 +++$+++ I like your username and your explanation of it.  May the Wiki be with you-- +++$+++ I like your username and your explanation of it.  May the Wiki be with you--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] 23:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
264879 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264878 +++$+++ 264878 +++$+++ 2006-03-15 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.142443320E09 +++$+++ If you like [[Karl Popper]] then I recommend [[David Deutsch]]'s book ''[http:\/\/www.amazon.co.uk\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/0140146903\/qid=1142414372\/sr=8-2\/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i2_xgl\/202-9163159-9951842 Fabric of Reality]'' I found it really inspirational as it draws parallels between Popper's epistimology and the way knowledge is embodied in the structure of living things bythe  process of falsification we know as natural selection, and much more in mathematics and computing also.  +++$+++ :If you like [[Karl Popper]] then I recommend [[David Deutsch]]'s book ''[http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0140146903/qid=1142414372/sr=8-2/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i2_xgl/202-9163159-9951842 Fabric of Reality]'' I found it really inspirational as it draws parallels between Popper's epistimology and the way knowledge is embodied in the structure of living things bythe  process of falsification we know as natural selection, and much more in mathematics and computing also. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 09:22, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

264881 +++$+++ Serendipodous +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-20 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.142902020E09 +++$+++ Assuming you read my diatribes over at the JK Rowling discussion page, I just wanted to reassure you that I am not always so surly, but I do feel like I'm having to run circles needlessly at the moment while this... other person casually rips the article I'm maintaining apart.  +++$+++ Assuming you read my diatribes over at the JK Rowling discussion page, I just wanted to reassure you that I am not always so surly, but I do feel like I'm having to run circles needlessly at the moment while this... other person casually rips the article I'm maintaining apart. [[User:Serendipodous|Serendipodous]] 16:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
264882 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264881 +++$+++ 264881 +++$+++ 2006-03-23 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.143139860E09 +++$+++ Sorry no one has replied on this. There is a short description in the Vitamin C article  at [[Vitamin_C#Artificial_chemical_synthesis]]. Take a look at [http:\/\/www.scri.sari.ac.uk\/SCRI\/Web\/Site\/home\/ResearchAreas\/Theme2~GenestoProducts\/QHN\/External\/vitaminC.asp]. If you understand this and can add to the article please do.  +++$+++ :Sorry no one has replied on this. There is a short description in the Vitamin C article  at [[Vitamin_C#Artificial_chemical_synthesis]]. Take a look at [http://www.scri.sari.ac.uk/SCRI/Web/Site/home/ResearchAreas/Theme2~GenestoProducts/QHN/External/vitaminC.asp]. If you understand this and can add to the article please do. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 10:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

527026 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527026 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-06 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.207543500E09 +++$+++ I just happened to come across this. All I can say is I've never known ERcheck to lack common courtesy. I suggest all take a 1-2 day break from this and then revisit if needed. <span style=\"font-family: verdana;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ I just happened to come across this. All I can say is I've never known ERcheck to lack common courtesy. I suggest all take a 1-2 day break from this and then revisit if needed. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 21:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
527027 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527026 +++$+++ 527026 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.207582200E09 +++$+++ I have been upset about AfD for some time, and I believe I may have blown some steam off in ERcheck's direction when I saw that he nominated [[Aloha friday]] for deletion and it was in fact deleted.  For that, I must apologize to ERcheck and hope he accepts.  I still think that when a situation like this occurs, an article should be improved, not deleted.  There are RS regarding Aloha friday and its relationship to the Aloha shirt.  I am concerned that AfD is used to delete valid subjects as an excuse for not having to do the actual work to improve them.  When I participated in AfD, I would make every effort to improve an article, and in many cases,  I have spent money out of my own pocket to purchase archival articles from news archives in order to prevent them from being deleted.  I have done this not out of any great interest in the material, but for the sole purpose of preserving information.  Aloha friday should have been, at the very least, redirected to [[Aloha shirt]] and expanded.  That nobody was willing to rise to the occasion is troublesome.  I feel that bureaucracy and process have become more important than research and content. &mdash; +++$+++ :I have been upset about AfD for some time, and I believe I may have blown some steam off in ERcheck's direction when I saw that he nominated [[Aloha friday]] for deletion and it was in fact deleted.  For that, I must apologize to ERcheck and hope he accepts.  I still think that when a situation like this occurs, an article should be improved, not deleted.  There are RS regarding Aloha friday and its relationship to the Aloha shirt.  I am concerned that AfD is used to delete valid subjects as an excuse for not having to do the actual work to improve them.  When I participated in AfD, I would make every effort to improve an article, and in many cases,  I have spent money out of my own pocket to purchase archival articles from news archives in order to prevent them from being deleted.  I have done this not out of any great interest in the material, but for the sole purpose of preserving information.  Aloha friday should have been, at the very least, redirected to [[Aloha shirt]] and expanded.  That nobody was willing to rise to the occasion is troublesome.  I feel that bureaucracy and process have become more important than research and content. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 08:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
527028 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527026 +++$+++ 527027 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.207820340E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Apology accepted.  BTW, did you consider redirecting \"Aloha Friday\" to [[Casual Friday]]? &mdash;  +++$+++ :: Thank you. Apology accepted.  BTW, did you consider redirecting "Aloha Friday" to [[Casual Friday]]? &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 02:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
527029 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527026 +++$+++ 527028 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.207837440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for accepting my apology.  Yes, I have considered redirecting aloha friday to casual friday, however the topic actually has more to do with the aloha shirt.  You can view my preliminary content [[User:Viriditas\/Aloha shirt|here]].  I promise to help fix casual friday as well. :)  +++$+++ :::Thanks for accepting my apology.  Yes, I have considered redirecting aloha friday to casual friday, however the topic actually has more to do with the aloha shirt.  You can view my preliminary content [[User:Viriditas/Aloha shirt|here]].  I promise to help fix casual friday as well. :) [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 07:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

264884 +++$+++ JdH +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-27 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.143508560E09 +++$+++ Another issue is the environmental impact; I posted some of my concerns on the talk page. Perhaps a bit exaggerated, but I think this is a serious issue that proponents tend to overlook. That is especially true for the mega-think type of scenario: solar farms that -if they are to make a significant contribution to global energy production- will require thousands of square miles of desert to be covered with solar collectors of one kind or another. The environmental impact of that is got to be huge. I favor much more the small-scale approach: have every single roof in the country covered by solar collectors, of one kind or another. That way environmental impact is negligible, because we are only using surfaces that have already been disturbed anyway.  +++$+++ Another issue is the environmental impact; I posted some of my concerns on the talk page. Perhaps a bit exaggerated, but I think this is a serious issue that proponents tend to overlook. That is especially true for the mega-think type of scenario: solar farms that -if they are to make a significant contribution to global energy production- will require thousands of square miles of desert to be covered with solar collectors of one kind or another. The environmental impact of that is got to be huge. I favor much more the small-scale approach: have every single roof in the country covered by solar collectors, of one kind or another. That way environmental impact is negligible, because we are only using surfaces that have already been disturbed anyway. [[User:JdH|JdH]] 17:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
264885 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264884 +++$+++ 264884 +++$+++ 2006-03-28 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.143561600E09 +++$+++ The problems still remains that most poeple live where there is moderate solar power potential. Rather than build DC grids another approach is to generate hydrogen from the energy and then burn this to water where its needed. The article needs to include the technical challenges facing large scale solar power adoption.  +++$+++ : The problems still remains that most poeple live where there is moderate solar power potential. Rather than build DC grids another approach is to generate hydrogen from the energy and then burn this to water where its needed. The article needs to include the technical challenges facing large scale solar power adoption. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 08:00, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

2743 +++$+++ VernoWhitney +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-15 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.271389380E09 +++$+++ I notice that you appear to be one of the primary authors of the Clemson Wiki article, however you are not the only author and there is no indication that information there is released under a CC-BY-SA License, so there is a copyright problem with copying text from there to here.  +++$+++ I notice that you appear to be one of the primary authors of the Clemson Wiki article, however you are not the only author and there is no indication that information there is released under a CC-BY-SA License, so there is a copyright problem with copying text from there to here. [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 20:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
2744 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2743 +++$+++ 2743 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.271392920E09 +++$+++ I will undertake a rewrite... [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 21:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ : I will undertake a rewrite... [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 21:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 21:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
2745 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2743 +++$+++ 2744 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.271396040E09 +++$+++ Now rewritten and cleaned up per Wiki style. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 22:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ ::Now rewritten and cleaned up per Wiki style. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 22:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 22:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
2746 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2743 +++$+++ 2745 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.271397000E09 +++$+++ P.S. I need a bit of help with the dab for Bowman Field.  Thanks so much... [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 22:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ :::P.S. I need a bit of help with the dab for Bowman Field.  Thanks so much... [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 22:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 22:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
2747 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2743 +++$+++ 2746 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.271401020E09 +++$+++ As I said before, I am quoting my own copy. The material IS my \"own words\". [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 23:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ ::::As I said before, I am quoting my own copy. The material IS my "own words". [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 23:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 23:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

264890 +++$+++ Fyslee +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-03 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.146680460E09 +++$+++ BTW, I made a [http:\/\/www.geocities.com\/healthbase\/falsification.html Popper] page a few years ago. I'm also a fan. --  +++$+++ BTW, I made a [http://www.geocities.com/healthbase/falsification.html Popper] page a few years ago. I'm also a fan. -- [[User:Fyslee|Fyslee]] 11:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
264891 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264890 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.146681540E09 +++$+++ Thanks Fyslee,  this looks like an interesting site. Do you know of [[David Deutsch]]'s book ''Fabric of Reality'' [http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0140146903\/002-9665636-8265651?n=283155] on Popper which draws the parallel between Poppers philosophy and the natural processes which have accumulated knowledge about the universe within the bodies of living things. The [[Taking Children Seriously]] movement tries to use Popper's thought in the raising of children.  +++$+++ ::Thanks Fyslee,  this looks like an interesting site. Do you know of [[David Deutsch]]'s book ''Fabric of Reality'' [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0140146903/002-9665636-8265651?n=283155] on Popper which draws the parallel between Poppers philosophy and the natural processes which have accumulated knowledge about the universe within the bodies of living things. The [[Taking Children Seriously]] movement tries to use Popper's thought in the raising of children. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 11:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
264892 +++$+++ Fyslee +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264890 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.146705480E09 +++$+++ No, I'm not familiar with it, probably because it's not a subject that interests me all that much. --  +++$+++ :::No, I'm not familiar with it, probably because it's not a subject that interests me all that much. -- [[User:Fyslee|Fyslee]] 18:18, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

2748 +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2748 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-16 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.271411220E09 +++$+++ I have no doubt you're correct, but I don't believe that youtube clip will stand up as a RS. It requires research on your part to connect two sources and draw the conclusion.  +++$+++ I have no doubt you're correct, but I don't believe that youtube clip will stand up as a RS. It requires research on your part to connect two sources and draw the conclusion. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 02:47, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
2749 +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2748 +++$+++ 2748 +++$+++ 2010-04-16 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.271449200E09 +++$+++ I run into a similar thing with firearms. The frustrating thing with that article has been all the aircraft we KNOW were in films and shows, but finding a reliable source is a bear. But when some of us took on the task of saving that article, reliable sources was a requirement we agreed on being absolute. Every Friday, one of us removes all unsourced entries from the past week. The whole purpose of the article has been to keep all the cruft out of serious aircraft articles and so far, according to some, it's doing a decent job at it. But please, feel free to add to the article. All help is welcome.  +++$+++ *I run into a similar thing with firearms. The frustrating thing with that article has been all the aircraft we KNOW were in films and shows, but finding a reliable source is a bear. But when some of us took on the task of saving that article, reliable sources was a requirement we agreed on being absolute. Every Friday, one of us removes all unsourced entries from the past week. The whole purpose of the article has been to keep all the cruft out of serious aircraft articles and so far, according to some, it's doing a decent job at it. But please, feel free to add to the article. All help is welcome. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 13:20, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
2750 +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2748 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-16 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.271449440E09 +++$+++ BTW, it's not a preference about one aircraft over another, it's what we can find reliable sources for. There are tons of aircraft we know were in movies etc, but finding a source that says it is the tough part.  +++$+++ ::*BTW, it's not a preference about one aircraft over another, it's what we can find reliable sources for. There are tons of aircraft we know were in movies etc, but finding a source that says it is the tough part. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 13:24, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

264893 +++$+++ Viewfinder +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-08 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.147150080E09 +++$+++ Please supply his correct year of birth, not 1975.  +++$+++ Please supply his correct year of birth, not 1975. [[User:Viewfinder|Viewfinder]] 21:48, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
264894 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264893 +++$+++ 264893 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.147215780E09 +++$+++ Done.Its 1945.  +++$+++ :Done.Its 1945. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 16:03, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

96997 +++$+++ Shadowjams +++$+++ Mike Rosoft +++$+++ 96997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-06 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.302079740E09 +++$+++ You might be interested that a recent string of undos you did are linked to an IP used by a prolific sock puppet. [[User:204.2.37.158|204.2.37.158]] has been linked to date additions to music articles, a trend that's been ongoing for years now. If you caught any other similar edits from other IPs they might be useful to note in the SPI (I recently opened a new one that will probably be merged into that one soon).  +++$+++ You might be interested that a recent string of undos you did are linked to an IP used by a prolific sock puppet. [[User:204.2.37.158|204.2.37.158]] has been linked to date additions to music articles, a trend that's been ongoing for years now. If you caught any other similar edits from other IPs they might be useful to note in the SPI (I recently opened a new one that will probably be merged into that one soon). [[User:Shadowjams|Shadowjams]] ([[User talk:Shadowjams|talk]]) 01:49, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
96998 +++$+++ Mike Rosoft +++$+++ Mike Rosoft +++$+++ 96997 +++$+++ 96997 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.302657120E09 +++$+++ The page was originally marked for speedy deletion as [[WP:CSD#G12|copyright violation]]. Instead, I deleted it under a different criterion - as [[WP:CSD#G11|promotional]]. (Given that you are affiliated with the organization, you should have a look at the [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] guidelines. Generally, it is recommended for users not to create articles about themselves, their companies, etc.) In addition, the name of your account seems to imply that it is a shared corporate account; since an account is only to be used by a single person, I would recommend for you to [[WP:CHU|request its renaming]], or simply create another one. (See the [[WP:UN|user name and user account policy]].) -  +++$+++ * The page was originally marked for speedy deletion as [[WP:CSD#G12|copyright violation]]. Instead, I deleted it under a different criterion - as [[WP:CSD#G11|promotional]]. (Given that you are affiliated with the organization, you should have a look at the [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] guidelines. Generally, it is recommended for users not to create articles about themselves, their companies, etc.) In addition, the name of your account seems to imply that it is a shared corporate account; since an account is only to be used by a single person, I would recommend for you to [[WP:CHU|request its renaming]], or simply create another one. (See the [[WP:UN|user name and user account policy]].) - [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] ([[User talk:Mike Rosoft#top|talk]]) 18:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

264896 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264896 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-21 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.148275440E09 +++$+++ What did you have in mind by creating this article? Is this a definition of the verb \"to pluck\" or is there an encyclopedic topic coming? It is a very puzzling article. What uh... branch of Dewey decimal system would plucking fit into? I am very tempted to propose it for deletion, but that would be wrong on the day of the article's creation. Thanks. - <b> +++$+++ What did you have in mind by creating this article? Is this a definition of the verb "to pluck" or is there an encyclopedic topic coming? It is a very puzzling article. What uh... branch of Dewey decimal system would plucking fit into? I am very tempted to propose it for deletion, but that would be wrong on the day of the article's creation. Thanks. - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|CrazyRussian]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Crzrussian|contribs]]/[[Special:Emailuser/Crzrussian|email]]</small> 22:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
264897 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264896 +++$+++ 264896 +++$+++ 2006-05-21 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.148275980E09 +++$+++ I got there through the [[depilation]] article which linked plucking to a process in glaciation, which is a very specialised usage. The main article should be to the most common use of the term in English. There is a lot of material which could potentially link here, especially in the grooming and Roman era areas. Plucking is a major human activity and an encyclopedia should cover it. As for the Dewey system I suggest 390 \u2013 Customs, etiquette, and folklore.  +++$+++ :I got there through the [[depilation]] article which linked plucking to a process in glaciation, which is a very specialised usage. The main article should be to the most common use of the term in English. There is a lot of material which could potentially link here, especially in the grooming and Roman era areas. Plucking is a major human activity and an encyclopedia should cover it. As for the Dewey system I suggest 390 – Customs, etiquette, and folklore. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 22:33, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
264898 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264896 +++$+++ 264897 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.148292720E09 +++$+++ Do I have your permission to move these two comments to the article talk page? - <b> +++$+++ ::Do I have your permission to move these two comments to the article talk page? - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|CrazyRussian]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Crzrussian|contribs]]/[[Special:Emailuser/Crzrussian|email]]</small> 03:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

527041 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527041 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-04 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.209889800E09 +++$+++ There is an anonymous user ([[User:132.79.13.15]]), whom you have previously blocked for vandalism, that has vandalized my userpage a few times, seemingly in response for my reverting his\/her vandalism of [[Marine Corps Martial Arts Program]]. [http:\/\/www.dnsstuff.com\/tools\/ipall.ch?domain=132.79.13.15 Checking the IP], it seems to be a US Army domain (possibly [[Fort Belvoir]]), and some of the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/132.79.13.15 other contributions] are mostly related to the Army. I've added another vandalism warning template on the talk page, but I doubt it will do any good. Do you think you could do something administrator-ly to discourage this vandalism, or at least keep it on your radar? I would appreciate the help. ''' +++$+++ There is an anonymous user ([[User:132.79.13.15]]), whom you have previously blocked for vandalism, that has vandalized my userpage a few times, seemingly in response for my reverting his/her vandalism of [[Marine Corps Martial Arts Program]]. [http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ipall.ch?domain=132.79.13.15 Checking the IP], it seems to be a US Army domain (possibly [[Fort Belvoir]]), and some of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/132.79.13.15 other contributions] are mostly related to the Army. I've added another vandalism warning template on the talk page, but I doubt it will do any good. Do you think you could do something administrator-ly to discourage this vandalism, or at least keep it on your radar? I would appreciate the help. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]] 01:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
527042 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527041 +++$+++ 527041 +++$+++ 2008-05-04 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.209890460E09 +++$+++ Well, it seems that [[User:Rlevse]] threw a 24-hour block on him real fast. Still, I wonder how effective that will be. ''' +++$+++ :Well, it seems that [[User:Rlevse]] threw a 24-hour block on him real fast. Still, I wonder how effective that will be. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]] 01:41, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
527043 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527041 +++$+++ 527042 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.211828040E09 +++$+++ He's [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Bahamut0013&curid=9779673&diff=214480064&oldid=210352296 at it again]. ''' +++$+++ ::He's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bahamut0013&curid=9779673&diff=214480064&oldid=210352296 at it again]. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]] 11:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
527044 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527041 +++$+++ 527043 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.211829180E09 +++$+++ Much appreciated. Some people just don't have that much sense. ''' +++$+++ :::Much appreciated. Some people just don't have that much sense. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]] 12:13, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

2755 +++$+++ Ahunt +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2755 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-04 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.280909640E09 +++$+++ I like the addition of the Blue Oyster Cult album jacket to the article, but it is a fair-use image, which means that to keep it on the page you need to add a fair-use rationale to the image page, similar to the one that is already there for the album article. Let me know if this needs a better explanation! -  +++$+++ I like the addition of the Blue Oyster Cult album jacket to the article, but it is a fair-use image, which means that to keep it on the page you need to add a fair-use rationale to the image page, similar to the one that is already there for the album article. Let me know if this needs a better explanation! - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 01:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
2756 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2755 +++$+++ 2755 +++$+++ 2010-08-04 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.280910240E09 +++$+++ Okay - I have to admit, I  don't quite understand how the fair use template works... Do I have to add in another section for this inclusion of the image? [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 01:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ :Okay - I have to admit, I  don't quite understand how the fair use template works... Do I have to add in another section for this inclusion of the image? [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 01:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 01:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
2757 +++$+++ Ahunt +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2755 +++$+++ 2756 +++$+++ 2010-08-04 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.280946720E09 +++$+++ Yes, just copy the existing fair use template on the image page and change the details so it rationalizes using it in [[Aircraft in fiction]] instead. When you are done the image should have two fair use boxes, one above the other. Otherwise a nasty bot will remove it from the article for which the rationalization is missing! -  +++$+++ ::Yes, just copy the existing fair use template on the image page and change the details so it rationalizes using it in [[Aircraft in fiction]] instead. When you are done the image should have two fair use boxes, one above the other. Otherwise a nasty bot will remove it from the article for which the rationalization is missing! - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 11:32, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

527045 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527045 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-11 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.215802200E09 +++$+++ Sigh. [[User:68.97.66.71|another]] [[User talk:68.97.66.71|vandal]] is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Bahamut0013&curid=9779673&diff=224722645&oldid=224229378 set upon] me. I'm pretty sure this is a jarhead. It's a shame. ''' +++$+++ Sigh. [[User:68.97.66.71|another]] [[User talk:68.97.66.71|vandal]] is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bahamut0013&curid=9779673&diff=224722645&oldid=224229378 set upon] me. I'm pretty sure this is a jarhead. It's a shame. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]] 11:50, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
527046 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527045 +++$+++ 527045 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.215858900E09 +++$+++ I really appreciate your help with these harassing IPs, especially since you are supposed to be on a wikibreak. ;) Hope all is oing well with you. ''' +++$+++ :I really appreciate your help with these harassing IPs, especially since you are supposed to be on a wikibreak. ;) Hope all is oing well with you. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]] 03:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

2758 +++$+++ Ahunt +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2758 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-14 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.281813120E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For diligent and continuous contributions to improving [[Aircraft in fiction]] -  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For diligent and continuous contributions to improving [[Aircraft in fiction]] - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 12:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
2759 +++$+++ Ahunt +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2758 +++$+++ 2758 +++$+++ 2010-08-16 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.281979800E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your note! No problem, you have done great work on this article and while people are very quick to complain on Wikipedia, I think it is also a good idea to \"give credit where due\" and your work on [[Aircraft in fiction]] deserves recognition! -  +++$+++ :Thank you for your note! No problem, you have done great work on this article and while people are very quick to complain on Wikipedia, I think it is also a good idea to "give credit where due" and your work on [[Aircraft in fiction]] deserves recognition! - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 10:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

264903 +++$+++ Cesar Tort +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-31 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.149111060E09 +++$+++ Actually, the Asimov mathematical prediction stuff is stupid even for science-fiction.  I am just curious why you reverted this sentence in Psychohistory page?  I\u2019d rather prefer all reference to Asimov removed from article except the original disambiguation sentence. \u2014 +++$+++ Actually, the Asimov mathematical prediction stuff is stupid even for science-fiction.  I am just curious why you reverted this sentence in Psychohistory page?  I’d rather prefer all reference to Asimov removed from article except the original disambiguation sentence. —[[User:Cesar Tort|Cesar Tort]] 14:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
264904 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264903 +++$+++ 264903 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.149121440E09 +++$+++ I did not revert the edit but incorporated an informal comment into the article. Take a closer look.  +++$+++ :I did not revert the edit but incorporated an informal comment into the article. Take a closer look. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 17:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

488918 +++$+++  +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 488918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-01 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.183273740E09 +++$+++ You may have noticed I made several [[:Template:Chicago Landmark templates|templates]] for [[List of Chicago Landmarks ]].  I am looking for suggestions on additional templates.  One I am considering is a Transportation template with [[Chicago Harbor Lighthouse]], [[Cortland Street Drawbridge]], [[Dearborn Station (Chicago)|Dearborn Street Station]], [[Garfield (CTA Green Line)|Garfield Boulevard \"L\" Station and Overpass]], [[LaSalle Street Cable Car Powerhouse]], [[Michigan Avenue Bridge]], & [[Union Station]].  Let me know what you think of this one and how you think some of the other listings might be grouped if you have a chance.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ You may have noticed I made several [[:Template:Chicago Landmark templates|templates]] for [[List of Chicago Landmarks ]].  I am looking for suggestions on additional templates.  One I am considering is a Transportation template with [[Chicago Harbor Lighthouse]], [[Cortland Street Drawbridge]], [[Dearborn Station (Chicago)|Dearborn Street Station]], [[Garfield (CTA Green Line)|Garfield Boulevard "L" Station and Overpass]], [[LaSalle Street Cable Car Powerhouse]], [[Michigan Avenue Bridge]], & [[Union Station]].  Let me know what you think of this one and how you think some of the other listings might be grouped if you have a chance.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 00:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
488919 +++$+++  +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 488918 +++$+++ 488918 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.183410960E09 +++$+++ You responded with a lot of opinions, one of which was \"I don't think I'd group together landmarks for different modes of transportation in one template, unless only a few are historic out of each of them.\"  That is precisely the case.  There are 3 Train stations, 1 lighthouse, 2 bridges, the cable car.  Compared to the other templates there are few of each unless I group them together.  --[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :You responded with a lot of opinions, one of which was "I don't think I'd group together landmarks for different modes of transportation in one template, unless only a few are historic out of each of them."  That is precisely the case.  There are 3 Train stations, 1 lighthouse, 2 bridges, the cable car.  Compared to the other templates there are few of each unless I group them together.  --[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 14:16, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

527049 +++$+++ STBotI +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-21 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.211429580E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.  +++$+++ Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. [[User:STBotI|STBotI]] ([[User talk:STBotI|talk]]) 21:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
527050 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527049 +++$+++ 527049 +++$+++ 2008-05-22 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.211447580E09 +++$+++ Fair use rationale added. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Fair use rationale added. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 02:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

2767 +++$+++ Wgfinley +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2767 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-27 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.288221900E09 +++$+++ However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words.  While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]]. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.  Thank you. <!-- Inserted via Template:Nothanks-sd -->  +++$+++ However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words.  While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]]. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.  Thank you. <!-- Inserted via Template:Nothanks-sd --> [[User:Wgfinley|WGFinley]] ([[User talk:Wgfinley|talk]]) 16:25, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
2768 +++$+++ Ahunt +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2767 +++$+++ 2767 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.288223460E09 +++$+++ I have reviewed the article versus the source article and can find no common text. There are ideas and quotes taken from the article, but these have been properly footnoted. I believe the tag to have been unjustified and oddly it was added with no edit summary by an admin, so I have removed it. -  +++$+++ :I have reviewed the article versus the source article and can find no common text. There are ideas and quotes taken from the article, but these have been properly footnoted. I believe the tag to have been unjustified and oddly it was added with no edit summary by an admin, so I have removed it. - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 16:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
2769 +++$+++ Wgfinley +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2767 +++$+++ 2768 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.288225320E09 +++$+++ What summary is needed?  It's pretty much lifting entire sections of the article.  I agree there have been some changes just not enough, I have tagged it for cleanup instead and outlined the issues I see with the article on the talk page. -- +++$+++ ::What summary is needed?  It's pretty much lifting entire sections of the article.  I agree there have been some changes just not enough, I have tagged it for cleanup instead and outlined the issues I see with the article on the talk page. --[[User:Wgfinley|WGFinley]] ([[User talk:Wgfinley|talk]]) 17:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
2770 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2767 +++$+++ 2769 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.288248840E09 +++$+++ Easy being a critic, idnit?  Much harder to generate the material.  I cited all the references and I note four sources for the article, not just the Check Six site.  I don't appreciate being handed the \"will be banned\" line after all the solid contributions I have given over the last five years.  I stand by my efforts. I didn't just start editing on the Wiki yesterday. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 23:54, 27 October 2010 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ :::Easy being a critic, idnit?  Much harder to generate the material.  I cited all the references and I note four sources for the article, not just the Check Six site.  I don't appreciate being handed the "will be banned" line after all the solid contributions I have given over the last five years.  I stand by my efforts. I didn't just start editing on the Wiki yesterday. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 23:54, 27 October 2010 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 23:54, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

264913 +++$+++ Joriki +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264913 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-04 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.152028380E09 +++$+++ I see you created some (all?) of the separate articles on the astrological signs, as opposed to the corresponding constellations. That seems like a good idea (though I also see arguments against it), but the result is that there are now countless links that mean the sign but point to the constellation. I've started fixing these, but it's a whole lot of work and I was wondering whether you'd like to help me. If so, we could for instance divide the signs up, say, six each, and systematically go through the \"What links here\" pages of the articles on the constellations.  +++$+++ I see you created some (all?) of the separate articles on the astrological signs, as opposed to the corresponding constellations. That seems like a good idea (though I also see arguments against it), but the result is that there are now countless links that mean the sign but point to the constellation. I've started fixing these, but it's a whole lot of work and I was wondering whether you'd like to help me. If so, we could for instance divide the signs up, say, six each, and systematically go through the "What links here" pages of the articles on the constellations. [[User:Joriki|Joriki]] 08:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
264914 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264913 +++$+++ 264913 +++$+++ 2006-07-04 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.152028740E09 +++$+++ Joriki, This sounds like a very good idea. I will give it what time I can this week. I'll do Libra onwards if thats OK.  +++$+++ :Joriki, This sounds like a very good idea. I will give it what time I can this week. I'll do Libra onwards if thats OK. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 08:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
264915 +++$+++ Joriki +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264913 +++$+++ 264914 +++$+++ 2006-07-04 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.152061500E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's fine. Coincidentally, as I'm writing this, I'm listening to ''Nothing's Impossible'': \"Even the stars look brighter tonight ...\"  +++$+++ ::Yes, that's fine. Coincidentally, as I'm writing this, I'm listening to ''Nothing's Impossible'': "Even the stars look brighter tonight ..." [[User:Joriki|Joriki]] 18:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

2772 +++$+++ Nortonius +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-03 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.296731760E09 +++$+++ Hello Mark Sublette, I was wondering if you'd seen my comment [[Talk:List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_military_aircraft_(1950\u20131959)#15_October_1958|here]], and if you might be able to do something with it - no worries if not, I'm just curious! Cheers.  +++$+++ Hello Mark Sublette, I was wondering if you'd seen my comment [[Talk:List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_military_aircraft_(1950–1959)#15_October_1958|here]], and if you might be able to do something with it - no worries if not, I'm just curious! Cheers. [[User:Nortonius|Nortonius]] ([[User talk:Nortonius|talk]]) 03:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
2773 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2772 +++$+++ 2772 +++$+++ 2011-02-06 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.296981780E09 +++$+++ Found it and added it... [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 00:43, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ :Found it and added it... [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 00:43, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 00:43, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
2774 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2772 +++$+++ 2772 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.298247960E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

527061 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-18 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.213857780E09 +++$+++ Hey, hope all is well.  I was hoping you might help me with something real quick if you get the chance.  You know I stink at the administrative stuff here so I was hoping for an assisst.  I came across this article ([[Distribution Liaison Company]]) and she needs to be deleted or at leat merged into [[4th Supply Battalion]].  Not good practice for companies to be getting their own pages.  Thanks in advance, again hope everything is going good.  Cheers-- +++$+++ Hey, hope all is well.  I was hoping you might help me with something real quick if you get the chance.  You know I stink at the administrative stuff here so I was hoping for an assisst.  I came across this article ([[Distribution Liaison Company]]) and she needs to be deleted or at leat merged into [[4th Supply Battalion]].  Not good practice for companies to be getting their own pages.  Thanks in advance, again hope everything is going good.  Cheers--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] ([[User talk:Looper5920|talk]]) 23:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
527062 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527061 +++$+++ 527061 +++$+++ 2008-06-25 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.214441880E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I know you are on break but I came across one more that could use an assist.  [[Joseph R. Chenelly]]...seems this guy is a Public Affairs\/Combat Correspondent in the Marines who decided to write an article on himself.  It should really be deleted as it is blatant self-promotion.  If you could help it would be appreciated.  Thanks-- +++$+++ :Sorry, I know you are on break but I came across one more that could use an assist.  [[Joseph R. Chenelly]]...seems this guy is a Public Affairs/Combat Correspondent in the Marines who decided to write an article on himself.  It should really be deleted as it is blatant self-promotion.  If you could help it would be appreciated.  Thanks--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] ([[User talk:Looper5920|talk]]) 17:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
527063 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527061 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-27 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.214618940E09 +++$+++ Take a look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&contribs=user&target=KendallCC&year=&month= this]. User has only edited [[Joseph R. Chenelly]] or pages liked to\/from said bio, consistantly tags image captions with this Marine's name, and worst of all, I have my doubts about [[WP:BIO|notability]] (I can't bring myself to nominate it at [[WP:AFD|AfD]] because of all the work he's put into the article). I don't really have the diplomatic skills to tell him it looks kinda funny (and maybe even [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|suspicious]]) without [[WP:BITE|biting]] him. ''' +++$+++ :::Take a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&contribs=user&target=KendallCC&year=&month= this]. User has only edited [[Joseph R. Chenelly]] or pages liked to/from said bio, consistantly tags image captions with this Marine's name, and worst of all, I have my doubts about [[WP:BIO|notability]] (I can't bring myself to nominate it at [[WP:AFD|AfD]] because of all the work he's put into the article). I don't really have the diplomatic skills to tell him it looks kinda funny (and maybe even [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|suspicious]]) without [[WP:BITE|biting]] him. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]] 19:09, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

2775 +++$+++ Sturmvogel 66 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2775 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-03 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.299146040E09 +++$+++ Do you have a source that shows that the La-7 was in Chinese service? It could have easily been an La-9 that shot down that airliner.-- +++$+++ Do you have a source that shows that the La-7 was in Chinese service? It could have easily been an La-9 that shot down that airliner.--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 01:54, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
2776 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2775 +++$+++ 2775 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.299146520E09 +++$+++ I was using both the reference lower down in the existing La-7 Wiki article, as well as the account of the shoot-down that I have now added to the lede as a ref. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 02:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ : I was using both the reference lower down in the existing La-7 Wiki article, as well as the account of the shoot-down that I have now added to the lede as a ref. [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 02:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 02:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
2777 +++$+++ Sturmvogel 66 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2775 +++$+++ 2776 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.299149040E09 +++$+++ I was afraid of that. I can't find anything reliable that confirms the export of La-7s to China or even North Korea.-- +++$+++ ::I was afraid of that. I can't find anything reliable that confirms the export of La-7s to China or even North Korea.--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 02:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

593667 +++$+++ AFBorchert +++$+++ Fæ +++$+++ 593667 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-08 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.312820580E09 +++$+++ Hi F\xe6, I am writing to you as you are in contact with the British Library and you possibly know who could help me in this case. I have recently scanned an 1851 book by the Irish architect J. J. McCarthy, titled ''Suggestions on the Arrangement and Characteristics of Parish Churches'', from a microfiche created from a book of the British Library, uploaded it to Commons and prepared it for Wikisource. The remaining problem are the twelve figures of this book which include some fine drawings by the draughtsman Patrick Hanlon. Despite all my efforts the scans do not look good as the tonal range of the microfiche is unsufficient. Even worse, any attempt to make the details of the darker parts visible lets the whole drawing be overshadowed by speckles, fingerprints, and dust spots on the microfiche. Hence it would be great if the 12 figures or at least the drawings by Patrick Hanlon could be rescanned from an original source. It is a rare book and only very few libraries have it including the British Library. Do you see a way how could this be done? I cannot do it from Germany and I am at the earliest in fall 2012 in Dublin where the National Library and Trinity College have it as well. And it would be worth the effort as J. J. McCarthy is the leading Irish Gothic Revival architect and this book had a lasting effect in Ireland. As I have recently managed to get his article deleted here (see [[User:AFBorchert\/Case MacL.|here]] for details), I feel indebted to write a new article for him from scratch and am currently preparing it offline. Thanks for your help,  +++$+++ Hi Fæ, I am writing to you as you are in contact with the British Library and you possibly know who could help me in this case. I have recently scanned an 1851 book by the Irish architect J. J. McCarthy, titled ''Suggestions on the Arrangement and Characteristics of Parish Churches'', from a microfiche created from a book of the British Library, uploaded it to Commons and prepared it for Wikisource. The remaining problem are the twelve figures of this book which include some fine drawings by the draughtsman Patrick Hanlon. Despite all my efforts the scans do not look good as the tonal range of the microfiche is unsufficient. Even worse, any attempt to make the details of the darker parts visible lets the whole drawing be overshadowed by speckles, fingerprints, and dust spots on the microfiche. Hence it would be great if the 12 figures or at least the drawings by Patrick Hanlon could be rescanned from an original source. It is a rare book and only very few libraries have it including the British Library. Do you see a way how could this be done? I cannot do it from Germany and I am at the earliest in fall 2012 in Dublin where the National Library and Trinity College have it as well. And it would be worth the effort as J. J. McCarthy is the leading Irish Gothic Revival architect and this book had a lasting effect in Ireland. As I have recently managed to get his article deleted here (see [[User:AFBorchert/Case MacL.|here]] for details), I feel indebted to write a new article for him from scratch and am currently preparing it offline. Thanks for your help, [[User:AFBorchert|AFBorchert]] ([[User talk:AFBorchert|talk]]) 09:23, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
593668 +++$+++ Fæ +++$+++ Fæ +++$+++ 593667 +++$+++ 593667 +++$+++ 2011-08-08 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312822020E09 +++$+++ The book is available to reserve in reading rooms other than rare books, so scanning is less of an issue (otherwise it would be very expensive). I should be able to scan it using the good quality books scanner which is available for public use. Scans are charged for, but I'll drop a note to see if this can come out of WM-UK microgrants (12 scans would be something less than 4 quid). I am next in the British Library on 23 August and have requested the book to give this a go. Drop me a note if someone else sorts this out for you first. Cheers  +++$+++ :The book is available to reserve in reading rooms other than rare books, so scanning is less of an issue (otherwise it would be very expensive). I should be able to scan it using the good quality books scanner which is available for public use. Scans are charged for, but I'll drop a note to see if this can come out of WM-UK microgrants (12 scans would be something less than 4 quid). I am next in the British Library on 23 August and have requested the book to give this a go. Drop me a note if someone else sorts this out for you first. Cheers [[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ#top|talk]]) 09:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
593669 +++$+++ AFBorchert +++$+++ Fæ +++$+++ 593667 +++$+++ 593668 +++$+++ 2011-08-08 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312828320E09 +++$+++ Thank you, F\xe6, that sounds great and to wait until 23 August is no problem. It will take some time anyway to finish the new article. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Thank you, Fæ, that sounds great and to wait until 23 August is no problem. It will take some time anyway to finish the new article. Regards, [[User:AFBorchert|AFBorchert]] ([[User talk:AFBorchert|talk]]) 11:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

264924 +++$+++ Hgilbert +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-17 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.155801420E09 +++$+++ I wonder if you have ever visited a Waldorf school? I suggest you do so. You have strongly held views that seem as if they come from reading PLANS' site but from no actual contact with the reality of the education. Visit, ask questions, see the reality for yourself...PLEASE!  +++$+++ I wonder if you have ever visited a Waldorf school? I suggest you do so. You have strongly held views that seem as if they come from reading PLANS' site but from no actual contact with the reality of the education. Visit, ask questions, see the reality for yourself...PLEASE! [[User:Hgilbert|Hgilbert]] 00:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
264925 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264924 +++$+++ 264924 +++$+++ 2006-08-02 08:33:00 +++$+++ 1.154532780E09 +++$+++ I reverted your edit because it was from an anonymouse IP address and blanked content without giving a reason either in the edit summary or the discussion page.  +++$+++ :I reverted your edit because it was from an anonymouse IP address and blanked content without giving a reason either in the edit summary or the discussion page. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 08:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

527069 +++$+++ Choess +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-14 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.218703860E09 +++$+++ {{user|Birke23may}}. Has the same fixation on [[Herluin de Conteville]] and a supposed descent from [[Charles the Younger]] as {{user|Burkem}}. Could you block if you concur? (I usually go to BrownHairedGirl for these, but she's on summer vacation just now.)  +++$+++ {{user|Birke23may}}. Has the same fixation on [[Herluin de Conteville]] and a supposed descent from [[Charles the Younger]] as {{user|Burkem}}. Could you block if you concur? (I usually go to BrownHairedGirl for these, but she's on summer vacation just now.) [[User:Choess|Choess]] ([[User talk:Choess|talk]]) 01:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
527070 +++$+++ Choess +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527069 +++$+++ 527069 +++$+++ 2008-08-14 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.218705720E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Naming pattern is also consistent with other SSPs of Burkem. I've reverted the contributions to legitimate articles (and beefed up the citations for [[Herluin de Conteville]] establishing that he was of obscure ancestry) and proposed the others for deletion.  +++$+++ :Thanks. Naming pattern is also consistent with other SSPs of Burkem. I've reverted the contributions to legitimate articles (and beefed up the citations for [[Herluin de Conteville]] establishing that he was of obscure ancestry) and proposed the others for deletion. [[User:Choess|Choess]] ([[User talk:Choess|talk]]) 02:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

2782 +++$+++ SarahStierch +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2782 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.311636720E09 +++$+++ |'''DC MEETUP 21''' is July 29! This meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving [[GLAM (industry sector)|GLAM]] professionals. See you Friday!  +++$+++ |'''DC MEETUP 21''' is July 29! This meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving [[GLAM (industry sector)|GLAM]] professionals. See you Friday! [[User:SarahStierch|SarahStierch]] ([[User talk:SarahStierch|talk]]) 16:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
2783 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2782 +++$+++ 2782 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.311914160E09 +++$+++ I wish I could, but I'm in South Carolina right now... [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 21:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ :I wish I could, but I'm in South Carolina right now... [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 21:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 21:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

2784 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311913740E09 +++$+++ |On Saturday, August 6, the '''National Archives''' is hosting a [[Wikipedia:Meetup\/DC 20|Wikipedia meetup, backstage pass tour, and edit-a-thon]] in College Park, Maryland. Meet staff and fellow Wikipedians, go behind the scenes at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together!  +++$+++ |On Saturday, August 6, the '''National Archives''' is hosting a [[Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 20|Wikipedia meetup, backstage pass tour, and edit-a-thon]] in College Park, Maryland. Meet staff and fellow Wikipedians, go behind the scenes at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 21:29, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
2785 +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ Mark Sublette +++$+++ 2784 +++$+++ 2784 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311914040E09 +++$+++ I wish I could, but I'm in South Carolina right now... [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 21:34, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Mark Sublette +++$+++ :I wish I could, but I'm in South Carolina right now... [[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 21:34, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Mark Sublette[[User:Mark Sublette|Mark Sublette]] ([[User talk:Mark Sublette#top|talk]]) 21:34, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

264930 +++$+++ 70.232.110.230 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-07 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.155003180E09 +++$+++ The talk page shows why the POV tag is necessary.  The article needs a lot of work.  I've started that process.  --  +++$+++ The talk page shows why the POV tag is necessary.  The article needs a lot of work.  I've started that process.  -- [[User:70.232.110.230|70.232.110.230]] 19:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
264931 +++$+++ Linas +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264930 +++$+++ 264930 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.155244800E09 +++$+++ FYI, you've been listed as an involved party at [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal\/Cases\/2006-08-09 Orthomolecular medicine and related pages]]. My advice: ignore the case until it affects you personally, or you are asked for direct involvement.  +++$+++ :FYI, you've been listed as an involved party at [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-08-09 Orthomolecular medicine and related pages]]. My advice: ignore the case until it affects you personally, or you are asked for direct involvement. [[User:Linas|linas]] 14:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

568443 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568443 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-20 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.150858320E09 +++$+++ This page is now protected from editing by unregistered users, as requested on [[WP:AIV]]. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ This page is now protected from editing by unregistered users, as requested on [[WP:AIV]]. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 19:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
568444 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568443 +++$+++ 568443 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.150858800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the quick action, much appreciated! -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the quick action, much appreciated! --[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 20:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

264932 +++$+++ Chocolateboy +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-23 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.156373580E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Chocolateboy|chocolateboy]] 15:53, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
264933 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264932 +++$+++ 264932 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.156386240E09 +++$+++ I was stunned too when I found it on Google images.  +++$+++ :I was stunned too when I found it on Google images. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 19:24, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

527077 +++$+++ TestEditBot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-20 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.219229340E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test {{#if:The Getaway (novel)|on the page [[:The Getaway (novel)]]}} worked, and it has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to [[Wikipedia|this encyclopedia]]. If you would like to experiment further, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-test1 -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test {{#if:The Getaway (novel)|on the page [[:The Getaway (novel)]]}} worked, and it has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to [[Wikipedia|this encyclopedia]]. If you would like to experiment further, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-test1 --> [[User:TestEditBot|TestEditBot]] ([[User talk:TestEditBot|talk]]) 03:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
527078 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527077 +++$+++ 527077 +++$+++ 2008-08-20 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.219229820E09 +++$+++ Respectfully, the bot is wrong.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=The_Getaway_%28novel%29&diff=233042669&oldid=233042665].  An intentional addition at the beginning of expansion.  Article did not contain any information about content\/genre with the exception of the category.  Will report bot. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Respectfully, the bot is wrong.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Getaway_%28novel%29&diff=233042669&oldid=233042665].  An intentional addition at the beginning of expansion.  Article did not contain any information about content/genre with the exception of the category.  Will report bot. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 03:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

264935 +++$+++ Wobble +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-17 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.158499980E09 +++$+++ On [[English people]] you claim that a list does not conform to good practice, and yet you just reverted one style of list to another. All I had done was change the format to a vertical from a horizontal list, but both are lists. I have removed the list, it is a duplication of material from the [[List of English people]] article, but I am rather bemused as to your comment. A list is a list, and you had not removed the list at all, you had merely changes the style of the list.  +++$+++ On [[English people]] you claim that a list does not conform to good practice, and yet you just reverted one style of list to another. All I had done was change the format to a vertical from a horizontal list, but both are lists. I have removed the list, it is a duplication of material from the [[List of English people]] article, but I am rather bemused as to your comment. A list is a list, and you had not removed the list at all, you had merely changes the style of the list. [[User:Wobble|Alun]] 06:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
264936 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264935 +++$+++ 264935 +++$+++ 2006-09-17 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.158522180E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Wikipedia:Embedded list]]. I have no objection to a list of the most prominent and influential English people who by their contribution have made a world wide impact and I think this adds to the article. However [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Wikipedia Style]] is to avoid the use of bulleted lists in an article ( except those in articles which are soley lists). Articles should try to describe their subject using prose and where a list is beneficial , use the  [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Serial_commas|Serial Comma]] method.  +++$+++ :Please see [[Wikipedia:Embedded list]]. I have no objection to a list of the most prominent and influential English people who by their contribution have made a world wide impact and I think this adds to the article. However [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Wikipedia Style]] is to avoid the use of bulleted lists in an article ( except those in articles which are soley lists). Articles should try to describe their subject using prose and where a list is beneficial , use the  [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Serial_commas|Serial Comma]] method. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 12:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

2792 +++$+++ LoriLee +++$+++ Backtable +++$+++ 2792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.310755140E09 +++$+++ We hope you're able to [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/TCMI\/BackstagePass2#Sign up|attend]] the upcoming Backstage Pass! If you're not able to attend, but are interested in remaining involved and up to date on the museum's Wikipedia project, please sign up on our [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/TCMI\/Volunteer#E-Volunteer sign up|E-Volunteer page]]. There will also be an opportunity to participate in the Edit-a-Thon [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/TCMI\/Caplan Collection|online]], if you cannot attend on-site. If you'd like to make a request for images or research content from our curators, you can add to the [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/TCMI\/Requests|Requests page]]. Let me know if you have any questions and I hope to be in touch!  +++$+++ We hope you're able to [[Wikipedia:GLAM/TCMI/BackstagePass2#Sign up|attend]] the upcoming Backstage Pass! If you're not able to attend, but are interested in remaining involved and up to date on the museum's Wikipedia project, please sign up on our [[Wikipedia:GLAM/TCMI/Volunteer#E-Volunteer sign up|E-Volunteer page]]. There will also be an opportunity to participate in the Edit-a-Thon [[Wikipedia:GLAM/TCMI/Caplan Collection|online]], if you cannot attend on-site. If you'd like to make a request for images or research content from our curators, you can add to the [[Wikipedia:GLAM/TCMI/Requests|Requests page]]. Let me know if you have any questions and I hope to be in touch! [[User:LoriLee|LoriLee]] ([[User talk:LoriLee|talk]]) 11:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
2793 +++$+++ LoriLee +++$+++ Backtable +++$+++ 2792 +++$+++ 2792 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.311128160E09 +++$+++ Not a problem! Thanks for touching base and best of luck as you start school! You can stay in touch if you're interested in how things are going. But I understand how busy it is getting off to school. +++$+++ :Not a problem! Thanks for touching base and best of luck as you start school! You can stay in touch if you're interested in how things are going. But I understand how busy it is getting off to school.[[User:LoriLee|LoriLee]] ([[User talk:LoriLee|talk]]) 19:16, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

175228 +++$+++ Corneredmouse +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-13 09:24:00 +++$+++ 1.284395040E09 +++$+++ You removed the subsection [[Grog]] from this article with the argument that it was not required. I would argue that because Vernon's innovation cured scurvy in the navy and started a tradition that lasted over 230 years, it is not only appropriate but essential to the completeness of the article. I want to put it back but I don't want to get in to an editting war with you over it. Let me know your thoughts. Thanks,  +++$+++ You removed the subsection [[Grog]] from this article with the argument that it was not required. I would argue that because Vernon's innovation cured scurvy in the navy and started a tradition that lasted over 230 years, it is not only appropriate but essential to the completeness of the article. I want to put it back but I don't want to get in to an editting war with you over it. Let me know your thoughts. Thanks, [[User:Corneredmouse|Corneredmouse]] ([[User talk:Corneredmouse|talk]]) 09:24, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
175229 +++$+++ Corneredmouse +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175228 +++$+++ 175228 +++$+++ 2010-09-13 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.284396000E09 +++$+++ Looking at it again, it does look better. Thanks. I'm afraid I can't find the Albano reference in the article. If you could direct me to it I'd happily find out which one it is for you and disam it properly. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Looking at it again, it does look better. Thanks. I'm afraid I can't find the Albano reference in the article. If you could direct me to it I'd happily find out which one it is for you and disam it properly. Thanks, [[User:Corneredmouse|Corneredmouse]] ([[User talk:Corneredmouse|talk]]) 09:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

2794 +++$+++ Jsfouche +++$+++ Nsaa +++$+++ 2794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-16 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310861580E09 +++$+++ If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled \"Click here to contest this speedy deletion,\" which appears inside of the speedy deletion (<code><nowiki>{{db-...}}<\/nowiki><\/code>) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the '''[[Talk:Scrub nurse|the page's talk page directly]]''' to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these administrators]] to request that the administrator [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the [[WP:AFC|article creation process]] and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.<!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion (<code><nowiki>{{db-...}}</nowiki></code>) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the '''[[Talk:Scrub nurse|the page's talk page directly]]''' to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these administrators]] to request that the administrator [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the [[WP:AFC|article creation process]] and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.<!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Jsfouche|<span style="background:#191970;color:#FF8C00;padding:0 4px">jsfouche &#9789;&#9790;</span>]][[User talk:Jsfouche|<font color="navy"></font>Talk]]</font> 17:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
2795 +++$+++ Nsaa +++$+++ Nsaa +++$+++ 2794 +++$+++ 2794 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.310862060E09 +++$+++ It's not a duplicate, as far as I see from this source [http:\/\/www.aorn.org\/CareerCenter\/CareerDevelopment\/RoleOfThePerioperativeNurse\/] which I added at [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Perioperative_nursing&action=historysubmit&diff=439805794&oldid=422799135 Perioperative nursing] article, and contested at the talk page [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Scrub_nurse&oldid=439806161]. Have I misunderstand something here (I'm not a nurse, so I'm not into all the namings here)?  +++$+++ :It's not a duplicate, as far as I see from this source [http://www.aorn.org/CareerCenter/CareerDevelopment/RoleOfThePerioperativeNurse/] which I added at [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Perioperative_nursing&action=historysubmit&diff=439805794&oldid=422799135 Perioperative nursing] article, and contested at the talk page [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Talk:Scrub_nurse&oldid=439806161]. Have I misunderstand something here (I'm not a nurse, so I'm not into all the namings here)? [[User:Nsaa|Nsaa]] ([[User talk:Nsaa#top|talk]]) 17:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
2796 +++$+++ Jsfouche +++$+++ Nsaa +++$+++ 2794 +++$+++ 2795 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.310862780E09 +++$+++ Scrub nurse is a role that a perioperative nurse may perform.  As such, it should be a section within the main article and not a separate article. <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::Scrub nurse is a role that a perioperative nurse may perform.  As such, it should be a section within the main article and not a separate article. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Jsfouche|<span style="background:#191970;color:#FF8C00;padding:0 4px">jsfouche &#9789;&#9790;</span>]][[User talk:Jsfouche|<font color="navy"></font>Talk]]</font> 17:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

527083 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527083 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-29 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.220049480E09 +++$+++ Cheers! ''' +++$+++ Cheers! '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  15:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
527084 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527083 +++$+++ 527083 +++$+++ 2008-10-02 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.222971660E09 +++$+++ Hey, I had a thought aout the portal: perhaps we are utilizing biographies as featured articles a bit too often? Perhaps I'm counting wrong, but we are using them more often than non-bio articles. I understand that because we don't have very many B-class or better articles to choose from (due to your dilligence, the biographies tend to be in good shape), but it does seem unbalanced when you consider that we have a seperate featured bio... perhaps we could do a collaboration on a article or two and get them up to GA status. What do you think? ''' +++$+++ :Hey, I had a thought aout the portal: perhaps we are utilizing biographies as featured articles a bit too often? Perhaps I'm counting wrong, but we are using them more often than non-bio articles. I understand that because we don't have very many B-class or better articles to choose from (due to your dilligence, the biographies tend to be in good shape), but it does seem unbalanced when you consider that we have a seperate featured bio... perhaps we could do a collaboration on a article or two and get them up to GA status. What do you think? '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  11:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
527085 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527083 +++$+++ 527084 +++$+++ 2008-10-03 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.223018520E09 +++$+++ Biographies on USMC Portal: In 2008 (to-date) 3\/7; 2007 - 3\/11; 2006 (began in March) - 1\/13.  Thre have been more this year than in the previous years.  I would like to occasionally see biographies asthe Article selection.  2007 is a more typical  year - where there were ~25%.  My goal\/plan was to try to have a balance of different types of topics and from various times in USMC history.  I don't find too many bases have articles that are sufficiently strong &mdash; though I think it would be nice to feature major bases such as [[Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton|Camp Pendleton]], [[Marine Corps Base Camp Smedley D. Butler|Camp Butler]], and [[Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune|Camp Lejeune]].  Iconic battles such as [[Battle of Belleau Wood|Belleau Wood]] and [[Battle of Iwo Jima|Iwo Jima]], etc.  I'd like to have iconic USMC topics featured during Novembers.  (To Bahamut0013's talk page.) &mdash;  +++$+++ :: Biographies on USMC Portal: In 2008 (to-date) 3/7; 2007 - 3/11; 2006 (began in March) - 1/13.  Thre have been more this year than in the previous years.  I would like to occasionally see biographies asthe Article selection.  2007 is a more typical  year - where there were ~25%.  My goal/plan was to try to have a balance of different types of topics and from various times in USMC history.  I don't find too many bases have articles that are sufficiently strong &mdash; though I think it would be nice to feature major bases such as [[Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton|Camp Pendleton]], [[Marine Corps Base Camp Smedley D. Butler|Camp Butler]], and [[Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune|Camp Lejeune]].  Iconic battles such as [[Battle of Belleau Wood|Belleau Wood]] and [[Battle of Iwo Jima|Iwo Jima]], etc.  I'd like to have iconic USMC topics featured during Novembers.  (To Bahamut0013's talk page.) &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 00:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
527086 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527083 +++$+++ 527085 +++$+++ 2008-10-03 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.223023740E09 +++$+++ I agree on your suggestion of Belleau Wood. We should put them up quickly! Its already the 3rd! ''' +++$+++ :::I agree on your suggestion of Belleau Wood. We should put them up quickly! Its already the 3rd! '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  01:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
527087 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527083 +++$+++ 527086 +++$+++ 2008-10-03 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.223066700E09 +++$+++ 1\/1 sounds like a good, solid choice. I'm partial to the Okinawa photo, but I agree, a color picture would be better. I'll defer to you on the biography idea. The only quote listed sounds good. I think for a DYK, we could mention that officers carried the NCO sword briefly during the Civil War, then returned to the Mameluke after. You've already done the image. ''' +++$+++ ::::1/1 sounds like a good, solid choice. I'm partial to the Okinawa photo, but I agree, a color picture would be better. I'll defer to you on the biography idea. The only quote listed sounds good. I think for a DYK, we could mention that officers carried the NCO sword briefly during the Civil War, then returned to the Mameluke after. You've already done the image. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  13:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
527088 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527083 +++$+++ 527087 +++$+++ 2008-10-04 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.223166360E09 +++$+++ Hm. Well, October is also fire safety month. Perhaps we should feature an article about artillery :P I think your suggestion is very appropriate, and it does sound better than 1\/1. Ought to make Tony feel warm and fuzzy as well. ''' +++$+++ :::::Hm. Well, October is also fire safety month. Perhaps we should feature an article about artillery :P I think your suggestion is very appropriate, and it does sound better than 1/1. Ought to make Tony feel warm and fuzzy as well. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  17:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

2797 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Nsaa +++$+++ 2797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-17 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.310967900E09 +++$+++ Your contribution might fit better at [[Incandescent light bulb]]. At this point it doesn't seem relevant to the other article. +++$+++ Your contribution might fit better at [[Incandescent light bulb]]. At this point it doesn't seem relevant to the other article.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 22:45, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
2798 +++$+++ Nsaa +++$+++ Nsaa +++$+++ 2797 +++$+++ 2797 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310968500E09 +++$+++ Probably both places since The phenomen cover both subject?  +++$+++ : Probably both places since The phenomen cover both subject? [[User:Nsaa|Nsaa]] ([[User talk:Nsaa#top|talk]]) 22:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
2799 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Nsaa +++$+++ 2797 +++$+++ 2798 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.311048420E09 +++$+++ I'm not clear on how [[Heatball]] is relevant to the phaseout. +++$+++ ::I'm not clear on how [[Heatball]] is relevant to the phaseout.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 21:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

264942 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-08 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.163057040E09 +++$+++ Hi Lumos3 - \"and sometimes up to 600mg per 100g\" - have you got a reference for that, please? - thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Lumos3 - "and sometimes up to 600mg per 100g" - have you got a reference for that, please? - thanks, [[User:MPF|MPF]] 23:24, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
264943 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264942 +++$+++ 264942 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.163091600E09 +++$+++ also http:\/\/www.hort.purdue.edu\/newcrop\/ncnu02\/v5-393.html  +++$+++ : also http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/ncnu02/v5-393.html [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 09:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
264944 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264942 +++$+++ 264943 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.163094600E09 +++$+++ Thanks; I'll add one to the article -  +++$+++ ::Thanks; I'll add one to the article - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 09:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

527089 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527089 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-31 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.220172480E09 +++$+++ Man, it is always good to hear from you. I was about to send you an e-mail to find out how your doing. Your move of the page was perfect.  +++$+++ Man, it is always good to hear from you. I was about to send you an e-mail to find out how your doing. Your move of the page was perfect. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 01:48, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
527090 +++$+++ Richard ruffian +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527089 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-08-31 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.220250960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note on the Col Eddy page & for wiki-fying it more than I had.  He had a pretty amazing life.   +++$+++ ::Thanks for the note on the Col Eddy page & for wiki-fying it more than I had.  He had a pretty amazing life.  [[User:Richard ruffian|Richard ruffian]] ([[User talk:Richard ruffian|talk]]) 23:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

611126 +++$+++ Sadads +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-21 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.279768980E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I was going to do that at some point, but while I was shrinking [[:Category:Military units and formations of the United States Air Force]], it seemed like a little too much of a time dump. Good job,  +++$+++ Thanks, I was going to do that at some point, but while I was shrinking [[:Category:Military units and formations of the United States Air Force]], it seemed like a little too much of a time dump. Good job, [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 20:23, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
611127 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611126 +++$+++ 611126 +++$+++ 2010-07-21 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.279769220E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I plan on working there sometime in the next six months to remove redundant categories.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I plan on working there sometime in the next six months to remove redundant categories. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 20:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
611128 +++$+++ Sadads +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611126 +++$+++ 611127 +++$+++ 2010-07-21 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.279774320E09 +++$+++ Sounds good. I am also trying to make the larger [[:Category:Military units and formations of the United States]] have a better parallel structure, though the Marines have been getting a little worked up over some of that effort. So I have decided to let it sit and cool for a bit.  +++$+++ ::Sounds good. I am also trying to make the larger [[:Category:Military units and formations of the United States]] have a better parallel structure, though the Marines have been getting a little worked up over some of that effort. So I have decided to let it sit and cool for a bit. [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 21:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
611129 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611126 +++$+++ 611128 +++$+++ 2010-07-21 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.279777440E09 +++$+++ They are going bananas over this? Elaborate please.  +++$+++ :::They are going bananas over this? Elaborate please. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 22:44, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
611130 +++$+++  +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611126 +++$+++ 611129 +++$+++ 2010-07-24 07:37:00 +++$+++ 1.279982220E09 +++$+++ Barging into random 3-day-old conversation: AWB will be much, much faster than HotCat. I could do it. Anyway, what I was here to say is that I actually got [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=John_Joseph_Woods&action=historysubmit&diff=375136048&oldid=368852346 some] article work done. Woo!  +++$+++ ::::Barging into random 3-day-old conversation: AWB will be much, much faster than HotCat. I could do it. Anyway, what I was here to say is that I actually got [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Joseph_Woods&action=historysubmit&diff=375136048&oldid=368852346 some] article work done. Woo! [[User:Sonia|<font color="#FF0099">so</font>]][[User talk:Sonia|<font color="#CC0099">nia</font>]]<sup>[[:simple:WP:EnWP|<span style="font-family:Georgia; color:#000">♫♪</span>]]</sup> 07:37, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
611131 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611126 +++$+++ 611130 +++$+++ 2010-07-25 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.280122500E09 +++$+++ No, my edits! But in all seriousness, I'm rather content doing it the other way as it allows me to find other mistakes that would not be seen if I was doing AWB.  +++$+++ :::::No, my edits! But in all seriousness, I'm rather content doing it the other way as it allows me to find other mistakes that would not be seen if I was doing AWB. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 22:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
611132 +++$+++  +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611126 +++$+++ 611131 +++$+++ 2010-07-25 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.280126940E09 +++$+++ I find editing in AWB fast enough, and I always check it over as well, but hey, whatever floats your boat. (You know, I haven't seen you on IRC (or other off-wiki things) for the last week, and you flatlined in edits yesterday... I was considering prank calling you just to make sure you were alive. But I suppose I could have just AGFed that you have a life.)  +++$+++ ::::::I find editing in AWB fast enough, and I always check it over as well, but hey, whatever floats your boat. (You know, I haven't seen you on IRC (or other off-wiki things) for the last week, and you flatlined in edits yesterday... I was considering prank calling you just to make sure you were alive. But I suppose I could have just AGFed that you have a life.) [[User:Sonia|<font color="#FF0099">so</font>]][[User talk:Sonia|<font color="#CC0099">nia</font>]]<sup>[[:simple:WP:EnWP|<span style="font-family:Georgia; color:#000">♫♪</span>]]</sup> 23:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
611133 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611126 +++$+++ 611132 +++$+++ 2010-07-26 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.280127780E09 +++$+++ I see thou didn't check Skype recently where I clearly left a message concerning my whereabouts. Have fun footing a hundred dollar phone bill though if you ever decide to call me though!  +++$+++ :::::::I see thou didn't check Skype recently where I clearly left a message concerning my whereabouts. Have fun footing a hundred dollar phone bill though if you ever decide to call me though! [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 00:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
611134 +++$+++  +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611126 +++$+++ 611133 +++$+++ 2010-07-26 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.280144640E09 +++$+++ I'm sitting on Skype now and I have no new messages. You sure you left me one? All I've gotten (and ever get) is random friend requests from Pakistani guys. And I have contacts in phone companies... pranking you won't cost me anything at all. What would you do if I rang your house (not your cellphone, mind) in the middle of the night?  +++$+++ ::::::::I'm sitting on Skype now and I have no new messages. You sure you left me one? All I've gotten (and ever get) is random friend requests from Pakistani guys. And I have contacts in phone companies... pranking you won't cost me anything at all. What would you do if I rang your house (not your cellphone, mind) in the middle of the night? [[User:Sonia|<font color="#FF0099">so</font>]][[User talk:Sonia|<font color="#CC0099">nia</font>]]<sup>[[:simple:WP:EnWP|<span style="font-family:Georgia; color:#000">♫♪</span>]]</sup> 04:44, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
611135 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611126 +++$+++ 611134 +++$+++ 2010-07-26 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.280202600E09 +++$+++ I would probably stake out your house. Wow, I feel like a creep feeding the creep troll. Well considering where your last name is from, the friend requests aren't all that suprising.  +++$+++ :::::::::I would probably stake out your house. Wow, I feel like a creep feeding the creep troll. Well considering where your last name is from, the friend requests aren't all that suprising. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 20:50, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

527093 +++$+++ Rholton +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527093 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-01 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.220317620E09 +++$+++ For your work cleaning up the references on [[Wasilla, Alaska]]. &ndash; +++$+++ For your work cleaning up the references on [[Wasilla, Alaska]]. &ndash;[[User:Rholton|RHolton]][[User talk:Rholton|<b><font size="3">≡</font></b>]]&ndash; 18:07, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
527094 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527093 +++$+++ 527093 +++$+++ 2008-09-03 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.220467140E09 +++$+++ Have you considered being a coordinator? I'd like to nominate you, but I thought I'd ask you first. I think you'd do a pretty good job at it, you certainly have the people skills. ''' +++$+++ :Have you considered being a coordinator? I'd like to nominate you, but I thought I'd ask you first. I think you'd do a pretty good job at it, you certainly have the people skills. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  11:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

264950 +++$+++ Eyeball226 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264950 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.168766700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Eyeball226|Liam Markham]] 01:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
264951 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264950 +++$+++ 264950 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.168814520E09 +++$+++ Hello Liam, I did the caption by comparing with other photos of the ISB and so may have made a mistake. Please amend the caption if you know for certain, as per the Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|be bold policy]].  +++$+++ : Hello Liam, I did the caption by comparing with other photos of the ISB and so may have made a mistake. Please amend the caption if you know for certain, as per the Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|be bold policy]]. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 14:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
264952 +++$+++ Eyeball226 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264950 +++$+++ 264951 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.168903500E09 +++$+++ Many thanks.  +++$+++ :: Many thanks. [[User:Eyeball226|Liam Markham]] 15:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

87849 +++$+++ Sodabottle +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.300384620E09 +++$+++ This IP from Chennai is restoring articles, you have recently worked on, to previous versions. I have reverted his\/her edits. Probably one of the matadors you are taking on. -- +++$+++ This IP from Chennai is restoring articles, you have recently worked on, to previous versions. I have reverted his/her edits. Probably one of the matadors you are taking on. --[[User:Sodabottle|Sodabottle]] ([[User talk:Sodabottle|talk]]) 10:57, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
87850 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87849 +++$+++ 87849 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.300393320E09 +++$+++ :) Thanks, Sodabottle, for watching over the [[British Raj]] article!   +++$+++ : :) Thanks, Sodabottle, for watching over the [[British Raj]] article!  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 13:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

2808 +++$+++ CliffC +++$+++ Jun Nijo +++$+++ 2808 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-15 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.266232920E09 +++$+++ Please provide [[Help:Edit summary|edit summaries]] with your edits.  Without them, other editors have difficulty understanding what you're trying to accomplish.  Edits that have edit summaries are much less likely to be [[WP:REVERT|reverted]]. Thanks,  +++$+++ Please provide [[Help:Edit summary|edit summaries]] with your edits.  Without them, other editors have difficulty understanding what you're trying to accomplish.  Edits that have edit summaries are much less likely to be [[WP:REVERT|reverted]]. Thanks, [[User:CliffC|CliffC]] ([[User talk:CliffC|talk]]) 03:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
2809 +++$+++ MrDolomite +++$+++ Jun Nijo +++$+++ 2808 +++$+++ 2808 +++$+++ 2010-02-15 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.266240780E09 +++$+++ Yes, please do.  There were several Kennedy related articles with categorization changes which have been reverted due to lack of summaries.<small> &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ *Yes, please do.  There were several Kennedy related articles with categorization changes which have been reverted due to lack of summaries.<small> &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:MrDolomite|MrDolomite]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[User talk:MrDolomite|Talk]]</small> 05:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
2810 +++$+++ MrDolomite +++$+++ Jun Nijo +++$+++ 2808 +++$+++ 2808 +++$+++ 2010-02-15 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.266241020E09 +++$+++ Reviewing more of your edits, it appears you were changing {{ccl|American Roman Catholics}} to {{ccl|American Roman Catholic politicians}}.<small> &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ *Reviewing more of your edits, it appears you were changing {{ccl|American Roman Catholics}} to {{ccl|American Roman Catholic politicians}}.<small> &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:MrDolomite|MrDolomite]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[User talk:MrDolomite|Talk]]</small> 05:37, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

527100 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-06 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.220701980E09 +++$+++ The article is on \"hold\" for GA. There are some referencing concerns on the talk page and I wondering if you could do me a favor and look into them, because when it comes to referencing formats, I am a total idiot. Thanks.  +++$+++ The article is on "hold" for GA. There are some referencing concerns on the talk page and I wondering if you could do me a favor and look into them, because when it comes to referencing formats, I am a total idiot. Thanks. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 04:53, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
527101 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527100 +++$+++ 527100 +++$+++ 2008-09-07 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.220771280E09 +++$+++ Thank you buddy, I know that I can always count on you. Let's see what happens now.  +++$+++ *Thank you buddy, I know that I can always count on you. Let's see what happens now. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 00:08, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

264958 +++$+++ Picapica +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-13 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.171434000E09 +++$+++ Hi, Lumos3. Just a note to let you know, in case you haven't been watching it, that the former \"Hedge (gardening)\" article has now been renamed along the lines you originally suggested on 30.11.2006. See [[Talk:Hedge (barrier)]]. --  +++$+++ Hi, Lumos3. Just a note to let you know, in case you haven't been watching it, that the former "Hedge (gardening)" article has now been renamed along the lines you originally suggested on 30.11.2006. See [[Talk:Hedge (barrier)]]. -- [[User:Picapica|Picapica]] 22:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
264959 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264958 +++$+++ 264958 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.171435320E09 +++$+++ Thanks  +++$+++ :Thanks [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 22:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
264960 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264958 +++$+++ 264958 +++$+++ 2007-02-14 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.171442760E09 +++$+++ If you can give a citatation for this I would be happy to see it in the article.  +++$+++ :If you can give a citatation for this I would be happy to see it in the article. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 00:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

2817 +++$+++ Good Olfactory +++$+++ Jun Nijo +++$+++ 2817 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-22 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.279815120E09 +++$+++ Were you planning on populating all of these new cardiovascular disease deaths in XXX categories, or are you going to leave each one with just one or two articles in it?  +++$+++ Were you planning on populating all of these new cardiovascular disease deaths in XXX categories, or are you going to leave each one with just one or two articles in it? [[User:Good Olfactory|Good Ol’factory]] <sup>[[User talk:Good Olfactory|(talk)]]</sup> 09:12, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
2818 +++$+++ Good Olfactory +++$+++ Jun Nijo +++$+++ 2817 +++$+++ 2817 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.279821360E09 +++$+++ Hello? (I noticed you continued to edit after my question, and apparently have continued more under [[Special:Contributions\/43.244.217.32|an IP]]?) I just want an idea of what your idea or goal is with these.  +++$+++ :Hello? (I noticed you continued to edit after my question, and apparently have continued more under [[Special:Contributions/43.244.217.32|an IP]]?) I just want an idea of what your idea or goal is with these. [[User:Good Olfactory|Good Ol’factory]] <sup>[[User talk:Good Olfactory|(talk)]]</sup> 10:56, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
2819 +++$+++ Good Olfactory +++$+++ Jun Nijo +++$+++ 2817 +++$+++ 2817 +++$+++ 2010-08-04 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.280924040E09 +++$+++ Hi again\u2014same question as before. Are you populating these in some sort of systematic way or just creating them? It would be nice if you could respond.  +++$+++ *Hi again—same question as before. Are you populating these in some sort of systematic way or just creating them? It would be nice if you could respond. [[User:Good Olfactory|Good Ol’factory]] <sup>[[User talk:Good Olfactory|(talk)]]</sup> 05:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

264963 +++$+++ Peterlambrechts +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264963 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.172292840E09 +++$+++ I am still new in Wikipedia and wonder what your source was to add following paragraph into the Coenzyme Q10 article:\" Young people are able to make Q10 from the lower numbered ubiquinones such as Q6 or Q8. Older people, and anyone whi is ill is not able to make enough. Q10 thus becomes a vitamin later in life and when sick\"  thanks and best regards  -- +++$+++ I am still new in Wikipedia and wonder what your source was to add following paragraph into the Coenzyme Q10 article:" Young people are able to make Q10 from the lower numbered ubiquinones such as Q6 or Q8. Older people, and anyone whi is ill is not able to make enough. Q10 thus becomes a vitamin later in life and when sick"  thanks and best regards  --[[User:Peterlambrechts|Peter Lambrechts]] 20:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
264964 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264963 +++$+++ 264963 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.172299260E09 +++$+++ Its from Doctor Abram Hoffer, M.D's website at  http:\/\/www.doctoryourself.com\/cancer_hoffer.html .  +++$+++ :Its from Doctor Abram Hoffer, M.D's website at  http://www.doctoryourself.com/cancer_hoffer.html . [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 22:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

527108 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527108 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-30 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.222838640E09 +++$+++ My fellow comrades, I'm requesting your participation (opinion or suggestion) as an uninvolved party in the following consensus: [[Talk:Raymond T. Odierno#Article protected| Gen. Raymond T. Odierno]] in an effort to terminate an edit-war between the two parties involved . The issue involved has to do with the inclusion in Odierno's biogragpy his participation in the so-called \"Surge\" or to simply \"link\" said Surge to an article about said subject.   Thank you.   +++$+++ My fellow comrades, I'm requesting your participation (opinion or suggestion) as an uninvolved party in the following consensus: [[Talk:Raymond T. Odierno#Article protected| Gen. Raymond T. Odierno]] in an effort to terminate an edit-war between the two parties involved . The issue involved has to do with the inclusion in Odierno's biogragpy his participation in the so-called "Surge" or to simply "link" said Surge to an article about said subject.   Thank you.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 22:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
527109 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527108 +++$+++ 527108 +++$+++ 2008-10-01 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.222926780E09 +++$+++ Thank you all for your valued participation and suggestions on the Gen. Raymond T. Odierno biography. The edit \"protection\" of the aticle will be lifted soon. Consensus suggest that additional info should be included for his early life and career. Career history should go after the \"Early life and education\" section. It is recognized that the general's involvement in the planning and undertaking of the surge is notable and should be included in the article, however it should be limited in scope to what was verifiably done by the general and should not weigh too heavily on that particular subject in order to to have a more balanced biography. Final comments welcomed.  +++$+++ *Thank you all for your valued participation and suggestions on the Gen. Raymond T. Odierno biography. The edit "protection" of the aticle will be lifted soon. Consensus suggest that additional info should be included for his early life and career. Career history should go after the "Early life and education" section. It is recognized that the general's involvement in the planning and undertaking of the surge is notable and should be included in the article, however it should be limited in scope to what was verifiably done by the general and should not weigh too heavily on that particular subject in order to to have a more balanced biography. Final comments welcomed. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 22:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

2822 +++$+++ Herostratus +++$+++ Jun Nijo +++$+++ 2822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-28 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.288303020E09 +++$+++ Whoa. This category is going to include a large chunk of the human race. Are we also going to have a category \"Married people\"? What is your rationale for the existence of this category? Absent some convincing argument, I'm opposed to it.  +++$+++ Whoa. This category is going to include a large chunk of the human race. Are we also going to have a category "Married people"? What is your rationale for the existence of this category? Absent some convincing argument, I'm opposed to it. [[User:Herostratus|Herostratus]] ([[User talk:Herostratus|talk]]) 14:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
2823 +++$+++ Jun Nijo +++$+++ Jun Nijo +++$+++ 2822 +++$+++ 2822 +++$+++ 2010-10-28 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.288308540E09 +++$+++ At least, this category's purpose is clear and what about categorized people. Must we delete [[:Category:Billionaires]], [[:Category:Criminals]], [[:Category:Centenarians]], [[:Category:Survivors]], and [[:Category:Adoptees]]?  +++$+++ :At least, this category's purpose is clear and what about categorized people. Must we delete [[:Category:Billionaires]], [[:Category:Criminals]], [[:Category:Centenarians]], [[:Category:Survivors]], and [[:Category:Adoptees]]? [[User:Jun Nijo|Jun Nijo]] ([[User talk:Jun Nijo#top|talk]]) 16:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
2824 +++$+++ Good Olfactory +++$+++ Jun Nijo +++$+++ 2822 +++$+++ 2823 +++$+++ 2010-10-28 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.288326960E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2010_October_28#Category:Divorcees]].  +++$+++ ::See [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_October_28#Category:Divorcees]]. [[User:Good Olfactory|Good Ol’factory]] <sup>[[User talk:Good Olfactory|(talk)]]</sup> 21:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

264967 +++$+++ Neilrobertpaton +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264967 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-13 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.173799260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Neilrobertpaton|Neilrobertpaton]] 08:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
264968 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264967 +++$+++ 264967 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.173849840E09 +++$+++ It means the same in the UK. Written words have more power and I doubt wank is as widely acceptable as all that even in Australia. I attended SY in the eighties but was never a devotee.  +++$+++ :It means the same in the UK. Written words have more power and I doubt wank is as widely acceptable as all that even in Australia. I attended SY in the eighties but was never a devotee. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 22:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

264970 +++$+++ Old Moonraker +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-16 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.174053180E09 +++$+++ Your recent addition to [[Steam engine]] was clear and illuminating. Any chance that you would be polishing up [[Cutoff (steam engine)]] along the same lines?  Regards.    -- +++$+++ Your recent addition to [[Steam engine]] was clear and illuminating. Any chance that you would be polishing up [[Cutoff (steam engine)]] along the same lines?  Regards.    --[[User:Old Moonraker|Old Moonraker]] 06:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
264971 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264970 +++$+++ 264970 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 09:07:00 +++$+++ 1.174061220E09 +++$+++ Thanks  . I'll take a look.  +++$+++ :Thanks  . I'll take a look. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 09:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
264972 +++$+++ Old Moonraker +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264970 +++$+++ 264971 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.174094460E09 +++$+++ Big improvement - impressed! -- +++$+++ ::Big improvement - impressed! --[[User:Old Moonraker|Old Moonraker]] 18:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

2828 +++$+++ Cognate247 +++$+++ Jun Nijo +++$+++ 2828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.311561060E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions\/Jun Nijo|your contributions]] to [[Wikipedia:About|Wikipedia]]. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]], which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to [[Collin Peterson]]. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-editsummary -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Jun Nijo|your contributions]] to [[Wikipedia:About|Wikipedia]]. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]], which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to [[Collin Peterson]]. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> [[User:Cognate247|Cognate247]] ([[User talk:Cognate247|talk]]) 19:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
2829 +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ 2828 +++$+++ 2828 +++$+++ 2011-04-24 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.303633380E09 +++$+++ Done! I wish you the best of luck with your study,  +++$+++ :Done! I wish you the best of luck with your study, [[User:Jonkerz|jonkerz]][[User talk:Jonkerz|♠]] 01:23, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
2830 +++$+++ Cooldenny +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ 2828 +++$+++ 2829 +++$+++ 2011-04-24 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.303633620E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much.  +++$+++ ::Thanks so much. [[User:Cooldenny|cooldenny]] ([[User talk:Cooldenny|talk]]) 01:27, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

527117 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-03 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.225749960E09 +++$+++ For the biographies, I'm split. I'm reluctant to feature Gen Barrow so soon after his death; featuring a concurrently developing article seems like a bad idea to me because there exists the possibility that some changes may need to be made, depending on how things develop, besides, it's not as well developed as the others. I was leaning toward Cukela, but then I saw your point about perhaps featuring a lesser-known name, plus, the other two candidates actually were at Belleau Wood, and you know I love to connect the farious features. Cole's article is not in any shape to be featured in its current condition. Gen Shepard seems the best choice to me, and he gets my vote, unless you can improve Cole's article to B-class in a few days. <small>(sheesh, this ain't American Idol)<\/small> ''' +++$+++ For the biographies, I'm split. I'm reluctant to feature Gen Barrow so soon after his death; featuring a concurrently developing article seems like a bad idea to me because there exists the possibility that some changes may need to be made, depending on how things develop, besides, it's not as well developed as the others. I was leaning toward Cukela, but then I saw your point about perhaps featuring a lesser-known name, plus, the other two candidates actually were at Belleau Wood, and you know I love to connect the farious features. Cole's article is not in any shape to be featured in its current condition. Gen Shepard seems the best choice to me, and he gets my vote, unless you can improve Cole's article to B-class in a few days. <small>(sheesh, this ain't American Idol)</small> '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  14:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
527118 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527117 +++$+++ 527117 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.225831200E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, I think Schoonover's painting still has the copyright in effect. He died in 1972, and thus we are still before the 50-year expiration. I think we could claim that images created before 1923 are in the public domain, but I connot verify when he actually painted it, he may have very well painted it after 1923. For convenience, I'll simply use [[:Image:Scott Belleau Wood.jpg]] until we can sort this out further. ''' +++$+++ :Unfortunately, I think Schoonover's painting still has the copyright in effect. He died in 1972, and thus we are still before the 50-year expiration. I think we could claim that images created before 1923 are in the public domain, but I connot verify when he actually painted it, he may have very well painted it after 1923. For convenience, I'll simply use [[:Image:Scott Belleau Wood.jpg]] until we can sort this out further. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  12:40, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
527119 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527117 +++$+++ 527118 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.225833300E09 +++$+++ The article is updated, and I have left a message at the Historical Division about Schoonover's painting. Hopefully, they will call back with good news. Our Ball is tommorrow night, and I've made an arrangement with one of the Combat Camera Marines to get some photography first thing on Friday morning (because we are ''supposed'' to get Thursday off to recover). I'm hoping to get the general cutting the cake, but I'll settle for the oldest Marine passing a slice to the youngest Marine. ''' +++$+++ ::The article is updated, and I have left a message at the Historical Division about Schoonover's painting. Hopefully, they will call back with good news. Our Ball is tommorrow night, and I've made an arrangement with one of the Combat Camera Marines to get some photography first thing on Friday morning (because we are ''supposed'' to get Thursday off to recover). I'm hoping to get the general cutting the cake, but I'll settle for the oldest Marine passing a slice to the youngest Marine. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  13:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
527120 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527117 +++$+++ 527119 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.225842540E09 +++$+++ I've made a template to help noting a page was featured on it's talk page. Please see [[Template:USMCportal]] and offer citiques. ''' +++$+++ :::I've made a template to help noting a page was featured on it's talk page. Please see [[Template:USMCportal]] and offer citiques. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  15:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
527121 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527117 +++$+++ 527120 +++$+++ 2008-11-05 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.225880700E09 +++$+++ Sorry, forgot to mention earlier: the HD was a bust. Not only did the lady have no clue what I was asking her for, but she seemed pretty irate at the idea I, a lowly corporal, was asking her for resources. I don't forsee any useful imagery coming out of them that isn't already on thier website, at least, not by my request. As to your suggestions to the template, I have incorporated them. As you can tell by the documentation, I origionally had them as \"selected\", I must have made the switch by accident when adding the links. (note: if you view the template again soon, you will need to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AERcheck&action=purge purge your cache] to see the update) ''' +++$+++ ::::Sorry, forgot to mention earlier: the HD was a bust. Not only did the lady have no clue what I was asking her for, but she seemed pretty irate at the idea I, a lowly corporal, was asking her for resources. I don't forsee any useful imagery coming out of them that isn't already on thier website, at least, not by my request. As to your suggestions to the template, I have incorporated them. As you can tell by the documentation, I origionally had them as "selected", I must have made the switch by accident when adding the links. (note: if you view the template again soon, you will need to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AERcheck&action=purge purge your cache] to see the update) '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  02:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
527122 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527117 +++$+++ 527121 +++$+++ 2008-11-05 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.225917420E09 +++$+++ I did uncenter it, and removed the break. After some sandbox tests, however, I determined that the break was better; long or short aticle titles cause the wrapping to look ugly. I did a bit more digging about Schoonover's painting, and I got the same results as you: colloquial or deductive evidence only... But that's OK, I like the other image better! :P ''' +++$+++ :::::I did uncenter it, and removed the break. After some sandbox tests, however, I determined that the break was better; long or short aticle titles cause the wrapping to look ugly. I did a bit more digging about Schoonover's painting, and I got the same results as you: colloquial or deductive evidence only... But that's OK, I like the other image better! :P '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  12:37, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

264974 +++$+++ Penwhale +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-20 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.174441620E09 +++$+++ For the Arbitration Committee, -  +++$+++ For the Arbitration Committee, - [[User:Penwhale|Penwhale]] | <sup>[[User_talk:Penwhale|Blast him]] / [[Special:Contributions/Penwhale|Follow his steps]]</sup> 18:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
264975 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264974 +++$+++ 264974 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.174693260E09 +++$+++ I was trying to give the article more structure. Bow to your knowledge on G&S.    +++$+++ :I was trying to give the article more structure. Bow to your knowledge on G&S.   [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 16:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

2831 +++$+++ Cooldenny +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ 2831 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-05 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.304627460E09 +++$+++ Hi Jonkerz. I appreciate for completing the survey two weeks ago. I would like to return your favor with a reward of an online gift card with no condition. Please leave your email address in '''[https:\/\/spreadsheets.google.com\/viewform?authkey=CLaQ2rUL&hl=en&formkey=dDh4WWdlclhra1dFb2JES0hzMHY5d0E6MA#gid=0 the final version of survey]''' of [[:m:Research\/Projects\/Motivation_to_Contribute_to_Wikipedia,_a_Collective_Work| my project]]. In addition, you can get chance to win $50 worth of gift card. It takes only 10 minutes to complete the final version because it contains only 35 questions. If you have '''Wikipedia friends''', please introduce this survey to them. Thank you so much.  +++$+++ Hi Jonkerz. I appreciate for completing the survey two weeks ago. I would like to return your favor with a reward of an online gift card with no condition. Please leave your email address in '''[https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?authkey=CLaQ2rUL&hl=en&formkey=dDh4WWdlclhra1dFb2JES0hzMHY5d0E6MA#gid=0 the final version of survey]''' of [[:m:Research/Projects/Motivation_to_Contribute_to_Wikipedia,_a_Collective_Work| my project]]. In addition, you can get chance to win $50 worth of gift card. It takes only 10 minutes to complete the final version because it contains only 35 questions. If you have '''Wikipedia friends''', please introduce this survey to them. Thank you so much. [[User:Cooldenny|cooldenny]] ([[User talk:Cooldenny|talk]]) 13:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
2832 +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ 2831 +++$+++ 2831 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.305366000E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ :Done. [[User:Jonkerz|jonkerz]][[User talk:Jonkerz|♠]] 02:40, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

2834 +++$+++ K.Darcy +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ 2834 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-13 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.305337800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the welcome!   +++$+++ Thanks for the welcome!  [[User:K.Darcy|kld]] ([[User talk:K.Darcy|talk]]) 18:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
2835 +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ 2834 +++$+++ 2834 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.305364740E09 +++$+++ I hope this answered your question, otherwise just ask again and keep up the good work, cheers,  +++$+++ :I hope this answered your question, otherwise just ask again and keep up the good work, cheers, [[User:Jonkerz|jonkerz]][[User talk:Jonkerz|♠]] 02:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

264979 +++$+++ Djdaedalus +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-14 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.176537840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for jumping in with the contributions on Albert Kahn.  After catching the feature on Radio 4's \"Front Row\" and the comment that there was nothing on wikipedia about him, I started that article with the first para and left the rest for later, since I was at work at the time ( 2pm in the USA).   Maybe the Radio 4 people will get a pleasant surprise if they take another look.  Cheers, mate.   +++$+++ Thanks for jumping in with the contributions on Albert Kahn.  After catching the feature on Radio 4's "Front Row" and the comment that there was nothing on wikipedia about him, I started that article with the first para and left the rest for later, since I was at work at the time ( 2pm in the USA).   Maybe the Radio 4 people will get a pleasant surprise if they take another look.  Cheers, mate.  [[User:Djdaedalus|Djdaedalus]] 01:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
264980 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264979 +++$+++ 264979 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.176538080E09 +++$+++ I heard the R4 piece too and that prompted me to take a look. Thanks for poiting out the French article asa source.  +++$+++ : I heard the R4 piece too and that prompted me to take a look. Thanks for poiting out the French article asa source. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 01:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

264981 +++$+++ Hgilbert +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264981 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-19 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.176972540E09 +++$+++ In the arbitration proceedings for [[Waldorf education]] and related articles, there were extensive discussions of standards for websites; it is my understanding that the arbitrators have clearly laid down guidelines for these as well, and that the Waldorf critics website (as well as pro-Waldorf websites) were not considered appropriate links, even if articles resided there that would otherwise be acceptable. Our goal should be to find neutral sources.  +++$+++ In the arbitration proceedings for [[Waldorf education]] and related articles, there were extensive discussions of standards for websites; it is my understanding that the arbitrators have clearly laid down guidelines for these as well, and that the Waldorf critics website (as well as pro-Waldorf websites) were not considered appropriate links, even if articles resided there that would otherwise be acceptable. Our goal should be to find neutral sources. [[User:Hgilbert|Hgilbert]] 01:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
264982 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264981 +++$+++ 264981 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.176991500E09 +++$+++ I am not linking to the site only to a document hosted there and authored by a Proffesor of  Science Philosophy. This is a key document on the Scientific basis of Anthoposophy. If the document itself is relevant then it is imaterial who hosts it.   +++$+++ :I am not linking to the site only to a document hosted there and authored by a Proffesor of  Science Philosophy. This is a key document on the Scientific basis of Anthoposophy. If the document itself is relevant then it is imaterial who hosts it.  [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 07:05, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

2838 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ 2838 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-10 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.307700780E09 +++$+++ {{done}}  +++$+++ {{done}} [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 03:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
2839 +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ 2838 +++$+++ 2838 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.307744640E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Jonkerz|jonkerz]][[User talk:Jonkerz|♠]] 15:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

527127 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-10 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.226317560E09 +++$+++ Thank you and same to you. I also wish you a Happy Veterans Day. I took a brain reat after I wrote \"[[Puerto Rican scientists and inventors]]\" and slowed it down. I'm thinking about writting about the \"Jewish immigration to Puerto Rico\" to include it in my immigration series. What have you been up to?  +++$+++ Thank you and same to you. I also wish you a Happy Veterans Day. I took a brain reat after I wrote "[[Puerto Rican scientists and inventors]]" and slowed it down. I'm thinking about writting about the "Jewish immigration to Puerto Rico" to include it in my immigration series. What have you been up to? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 03:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
527128 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527127 +++$+++ 527127 +++$+++ 2008-11-10 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.226361660E09 +++$+++ Happy Birthday, and Semper Fi. I'm sorry that ball image fell through, perhaps I can update it later this week if my friend ever follow through and gets me the images. ''' +++$+++ :Happy Birthday, and Semper Fi. I'm sorry that ball image fell through, perhaps I can update it later this week if my friend ever follow through and gets me the images. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  16:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
527129 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527127 +++$+++ 527127 +++$+++ 2008-11-10 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.226373360E09 +++$+++ I would like to share with you an underserved surprise that I recieved today, the USMC birthday, in an e-mail. [http:\/\/www.nnhs65.00freehost.com\/famous-marines-S-Z.html]  +++$+++ *I would like to share with you an underserved surprise that I recieved today, the USMC birthday, in an e-mail. [http://www.nnhs65.00freehost.com/famous-marines-S-Z.html] [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 19:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
527130 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527127 +++$+++ 527127 +++$+++ 2008-11-11 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.226417220E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the congrats. I was surprised that someone would do that on thier site. However, I noticed that there are a lot of names in that list (including mine) of former Marines that are not notable, so I guess that I am in good company (smile).  +++$+++ :Thank you for the congrats. I was surprised that someone would do that on thier site. However, I noticed that there are a lot of names in that list (including mine) of former Marines that are not notable, so I guess that I am in good company (smile). [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 07:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

2840 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ 2840 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.307927280E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Jonkerz, for your helpful edit adding a useful category to the [[WP:FA]] quality article, ''[[Lord of the Universe]]''. Much appreciated. ;) Cheers, -- ''' +++$+++ Thank you, Jonkerz, for your helpful edit adding a useful category to the [[WP:FA]] quality article, ''[[Lord of the Universe]]''. Much appreciated. ;) Cheers, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 18:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
2841 +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ 2840 +++$+++ 2840 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.307943840E09 +++$+++ No problem, I've added [[:Category:Documentary films by decade]] to articles like crazy the past week ;)  +++$+++ :No problem, I've added [[:Category:Documentary films by decade]] to articles like crazy the past week ;) [[User:Jonkerz|jonkerz]][[User talk:Jonkerz|♠]] 22:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

2842 +++$+++ Vlasich +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ 2842 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310501880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Vlasich|Vlasich]] ([[User talk:Vlasich|talk]]) 13:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
2843 +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ Jonkerz +++$+++ 2842 +++$+++ 2842 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310503620E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately there is not way to sign anonymous edits, but it's possible to list all edits made by an IP with the [[Special:Contributions]] function ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/127.0.0.1 click here for an example)]. If you want to follow up on the pages you have edited you can add them to your [[Special:Watchlist]]; that way all the changes will show up automatically in list format. I hope this help, otherwise just ask again! Cheers,  +++$+++ :Unfortunately there is not way to sign anonymous edits, but it's possible to list all edits made by an IP with the [[Special:Contributions]] function ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/127.0.0.1 click here for an example)]. If you want to follow up on the pages you have edited you can add them to your [[Special:Watchlist]]; that way all the changes will show up automatically in list format. I hope this help, otherwise just ask again! Cheers, [[User:Jonkerz|jonkerz]][[User talk:Jonkerz|♠]] 13:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

527131 +++$+++ Jojhutton +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527131 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-15 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.226745180E09 +++$+++ Sadly, a recent dispute on the [[Talk:Barack Obama]] page has spilled over to other articles on the presidents. The Nixon article has gone through a few changes, but I reverted the changes with the argument that any consensus reached on the Obama talk page is not binding on other pages. An editor has asked for a discussion. If you would like to join in, please do so at [[Talk:Richard Nixon]].-- +++$+++ Sadly, a recent dispute on the [[Talk:Barack Obama]] page has spilled over to other articles on the presidents. The Nixon article has gone through a few changes, but I reverted the changes with the argument that any consensus reached on the Obama talk page is not binding on other pages. An editor has asked for a discussion. If you would like to join in, please do so at [[Talk:Richard Nixon]].--[[User:Jojhutton|Jojhutton]] ([[User talk:Jojhutton|talk]]) 02:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
527132 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527131 +++$+++ 527131 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.226916840E09 +++$+++ ER, [[User talk:98.105.224.38]] should send his request to the following e-mail: vicvil@securenet.net.  +++$+++ *ER, [[User talk:98.105.224.38]] should send his request to the following e-mail: vicvil@securenet.net. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 02:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

264989 +++$+++ Simply south +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264989 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-27 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.180311540E09 +++$+++ I was proposing a project on the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council\/Proposals]] page but it seems to have fizzled out. I've started again on it, the proposal may be readded, i do not know. Anyway, i've created a user sub-page which is a start at [[User:Simply south\/WPHerts]], if you are interested.  +++$+++ I was proposing a project on the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals]] page but it seems to have fizzled out. I've started again on it, the proposal may be readded, i do not know. Anyway, i've created a user sub-page which is a start at [[User:Simply south/WPHerts]], if you are interested. [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] 17:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
264990 +++$+++ Simply south +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264989 +++$+++ 264989 +++$+++ 2007-05-28 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.180398780E09 +++$+++ I've made it go live. Do you know how i can encourage people to help with the setting up of the project?  +++$+++ :I've made it go live. Do you know how i can encourage people to help with the setting up of the project? [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] 17:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

2846 +++$+++ Rev. Michael S. Margolin +++$+++ Ian.thomson +++$+++ 2846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.312348680E09 +++$+++ We have a small mention in Theistic Satanism thus we fall under Satanism. +++$+++ We have a small mention in Theistic Satanism thus we fall under Satanism.[[User:Rev. Michael S. Margolin|Rev. Michael S. Margolin]] ([[User talk:Rev. Michael S. Margolin|talk]]) 22:18, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
2847 +++$+++ Ian.thomson +++$+++ Ian.thomson +++$+++ 2846 +++$+++ 2846 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.312356840E09 +++$+++ My bad, I won't stop you from restoring it.  Could you please leave a comment about it? Thanks.  +++$+++ :My bad, I won't stop you from restoring it.  Could you please leave a comment about it? Thanks. [[User:Ian.thomson|Ian.thomson]] ([[User talk:Ian.thomson#top|talk]]) 00:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

527135 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527135 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-24 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.227558000E09 +++$+++ I also wanted to let you know that I'll be deploying again to Iraq soon after the new year. The majority of updates will be dependant on you, though I will contribute as able while forward. I doubt very much I'll once leave [[Al Asad Airbase]]. Cheers. ''' +++$+++ I also wanted to let you know that I'll be deploying again to Iraq soon after the new year. The majority of updates will be dependant on you, though I will contribute as able while forward. I doubt very much I'll once leave [[Al Asad Airbase]]. Cheers. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  12:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
527136 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527135 +++$+++ 527135 +++$+++ 2008-11-24 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.227591120E09 +++$+++ Your idea: certainly can't hurt, as long as we maintain flexibility and don't get married to any one thing. It would be a great idea if any newcomers want to help contribute to the portal. It also would be a great way for me to help contribute when my interent access is sporadic, as you won't be able to count on me to get something done by a certain date. ''' +++$+++ :Your idea: certainly can't hurt, as long as we maintain flexibility and don't get married to any one thing. It would be a great idea if any newcomers want to help contribute to the portal. It also would be a great way for me to help contribute when my interent access is sporadic, as you won't be able to count on me to get something done by a certain date. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  21:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
527137 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527135 +++$+++ 527136 +++$+++ 2008-11-26 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.227757860E09 +++$+++ I've done some cleanup on [[Dogs in warfare]], can you take a look and let me know if I left any big gaps? I would also appreciate if you could work you wizardry on some of those references. ''' +++$+++ ::I've done some cleanup on [[Dogs in warfare]], can you take a look and let me know if I left any big gaps? I would also appreciate if you could work you wizardry on some of those references. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  19:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

264992 +++$+++ Jamesd1 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-01 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.180739400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Jamesd1|James]] 16:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
264993 +++$+++ Jamesd1 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264992 +++$+++ 264992 +++$+++ 2007-06-03 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.180915680E09 +++$+++ I improved the criticism section.  Now he wants to delete the entire biography. +++$+++ :I improved the criticism section.  Now he wants to delete the entire biography.[[User:Jamesd1|James]] 17:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

2850 +++$+++ Jiri Dvorak +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2850 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-28 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.301301540E09 +++$+++ Hi, Erik. May I ask what kind of source would be good enough for you? Would it be sufficient to reference the http:\/\/www.klingonacademy.com\/index.php main page which talks about it as well?  +++$+++ Hi, Erik. May I ask what kind of source would be good enough for you? Would it be sufficient to reference the http://www.klingonacademy.com/index.php main page which talks about it as well? [[User:Jiri Dvorak|Jiri Dvorak]] ([[User talk:Jiri Dvorak|talk]]) 01:39, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
2851 +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2850 +++$+++ 2850 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.301309340E09 +++$+++ Fansites are generally not considered to be [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], unless they're official, or in some other way recognized as a trusted authority within the field. For something to be covered, the source should ideally be a neutral, third-party, which is to say that it's not affiliated with the subject matter, and and not biased in favor of or against it, which is why fansites are usually not sufficient. An exception can be made if a fansite reports something, and a reliable source picks up on it afterwards, then the fansite can be used as the primary source, and any neutral third-party sites as extra sources. It might seem a bit confusing, but there's a list of allowed and not allowed sources [[WP:VG\/S|here]], often with info as to why they're listed as they are, for example one not being allowed because the site has no editorial oversight.  +++$+++ :Fansites are generally not considered to be [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], unless they're official, or in some other way recognized as a trusted authority within the field. For something to be covered, the source should ideally be a neutral, third-party, which is to say that it's not affiliated with the subject matter, and and not biased in favor of or against it, which is why fansites are usually not sufficient. An exception can be made if a fansite reports something, and a reliable source picks up on it afterwards, then the fansite can be used as the primary source, and any neutral third-party sites as extra sources. It might seem a bit confusing, but there's a list of allowed and not allowed sources [[WP:VG/S|here]], often with info as to why they're listed as they are, for example one not being allowed because the site has no editorial oversight. [[User:Eik Corell|Eik Corell]] ([[User talk:Eik Corell#top|talk]]) 03:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
2852 +++$+++ Jiri Dvorak +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2850 +++$+++ 2851 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.301320920E09 +++$+++ I see. Blue's News is listed as reliable source. Would be following link sufficient: http:\/\/www.bluesnews.com\/s\/118767\/klingon-academy-modern-systems-patch ?  +++$+++ ::I see. Blue's News is listed as reliable source. Would be following link sufficient: http://www.bluesnews.com/s/118767/klingon-academy-modern-systems-patch ? [[User:Jiri Dvorak|Jiri Dvorak]] ([[User talk:Jiri Dvorak|talk]]) 07:02, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
2853 +++$+++ Jiri Dvorak +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2850 +++$+++ 2851 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.301322480E09 +++$+++ Why would be a game fan site considered as biased source for technical thing like this? Whether the patch improves the compatibility or not is imo not something you can be in favor of. Usually not many third-party sites care for news about game which is over 10 years old so having neutral information might be a problem.  +++$+++ ::Why would be a game fan site considered as biased source for technical thing like this? Whether the patch improves the compatibility or not is imo not something you can be in favor of. Usually not many third-party sites care for news about game which is over 10 years old so having neutral information might be a problem. [[User:Jiri Dvorak|Jiri Dvorak]] ([[User talk:Jiri Dvorak|talk]]) 07:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

2854 +++$+++ AndersJohan +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2854 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-28 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.301358720E09 +++$+++ But I'd like to hear your advice and opinion on the matter.  +++$+++ But I'd like to hear your advice and opinion on the matter. [[User:AndersJohan|AndersJohan]] ([[User talk:AndersJohan|talk]]) 17:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
2855 +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2854 +++$+++ 2854 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.301379360E09 +++$+++ The very first problem comes in the form of [[WP:V]] - The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. This info was added under a category titled \"controversy\", and what often happens on video game articles is that fans\/detractors of a game vent their frustration or spread rumors they've heard under just such a category, almost always without sources. Ideally, ALL information should be attributable to a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], and this is especially true if we're talking about a big claim like the developers distancing themselves from a part of their own game. If the developers themselves have made a statement on the matter in an official capacity, that would qualify as a reliable source. Bear in mind, though, that this would be a [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]]. It seems like a lot of the above info is analytical and interpretive in nature, and per the [[WP:PRIMARY]] rule, you will need a secondary source in order to include it. A good list of secondary sources can be found here: [[WP:VG\/S]].  +++$+++ :The very first problem comes in the form of [[WP:V]] - The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. This info was added under a category titled "controversy", and what often happens on video game articles is that fans/detractors of a game vent their frustration or spread rumors they've heard under just such a category, almost always without sources. Ideally, ALL information should be attributable to a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], and this is especially true if we're talking about a big claim like the developers distancing themselves from a part of their own game. If the developers themselves have made a statement on the matter in an official capacity, that would qualify as a reliable source. Bear in mind, though, that this would be a [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]]. It seems like a lot of the above info is analytical and interpretive in nature, and per the [[WP:PRIMARY]] rule, you will need a secondary source in order to include it. A good list of secondary sources can be found here: [[WP:VG/S]]. [[User:Eik Corell|Eik Corell]] ([[User talk:Eik Corell#top|talk]]) 23:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
2856 +++$+++ AndersJohan +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2854 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.301429880E09 +++$+++ I understand what you're getting at with that. The problem is that there are preciously few sources if any for that game (as prime example) and the information is just about impossible as such to give verifiable sources to, even though its a major thing in the game, the game just isn't covered enough because its over 13 years old. Even fansite information is sparse. I am really at a loss of what to do in those situations, had it been a written medium, it would be easier to rely on the editor being knowledgeable enough. This creates an incredibly poor article. Another issue with it, is that a lot of the information is either outdated or flat out wrong now, which gives an unnecessary bad view of the game for readers. Ultima Online might not be an important topic as just another MMO, but its important and notable because of its status as the very first real commercial MMO and has won many awards, including Hall of Fame awards. So its very hard to deal with and it needs to be dealt with, as Wikipedia should be an informative source whenever possible.  +++$+++ :::I understand what you're getting at with that. The problem is that there are preciously few sources if any for that game (as prime example) and the information is just about impossible as such to give verifiable sources to, even though its a major thing in the game, the game just isn't covered enough because its over 13 years old. Even fansite information is sparse. I am really at a loss of what to do in those situations, had it been a written medium, it would be easier to rely on the editor being knowledgeable enough. This creates an incredibly poor article. Another issue with it, is that a lot of the information is either outdated or flat out wrong now, which gives an unnecessary bad view of the game for readers. Ultima Online might not be an important topic as just another MMO, but its important and notable because of its status as the very first real commercial MMO and has won many awards, including Hall of Fame awards. So its very hard to deal with and it needs to be dealt with, as Wikipedia should be an informative source whenever possible. [[User:AndersJohan|AndersJohan]] ([[User talk:AndersJohan|talk]]) 13:18, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

264999 +++$+++ Meco +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264999 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-14 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.181856240E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[WP:CSD#Images\/media|Criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->  +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[WP:CSD#Images/media|Criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> [[User:Meco|meco]] 14:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
265000 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264999 +++$+++ 264999 +++$+++ 2007-06-24 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.182748620E09 +++$+++ The term [[Skepticism|skeptic]] has come to be associated with those who are skeptical of all supernatural religion. To call Christians who mistrust Cayce\u2019s claims skeptics is to mislead the reader since they are believers in one form of the supernatural. The two groups who criticise Cayce the most are the skeptics and the conventionally religious. I think both need to be mentioned.   +++$+++ :The term [[Skepticism|skeptic]] has come to be associated with those who are skeptical of all supernatural religion. To call Christians who mistrust Cayce’s claims skeptics is to mislead the reader since they are believers in one form of the supernatural. The two groups who criticise Cayce the most are the skeptics and the conventionally religious. I think both need to be mentioned.  [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 22:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

527144 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527144 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-30 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.228110900E09 +++$+++ I'm starting to pre-load some of the 2009 portal updates. One thing about Feb: we both wanted to to an Iwo Jima theme, and I'd like to use [[Holland Smith]] as the article, but it's start class. Since you are the biography expert, I thought I'd point you in that direction (let me know if you think you can't get at it soon, I'll pick someone else, probably a MOH winner). ''' +++$+++ I'm starting to pre-load some of the 2009 portal updates. One thing about Feb: we both wanted to to an Iwo Jima theme, and I'd like to use [[Holland Smith]] as the article, but it's start class. Since you are the biography expert, I thought I'd point you in that direction (let me know if you think you can't get at it soon, I'll pick someone else, probably a MOH winner). '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  21:55, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
527145 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527144 +++$+++ 527144 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.228120680E09 +++$+++ I dunno. I've never heard of him, though that isn't saying much. I don't see a huge USMC connection with him by looking at his article... I wouldn't use him as the featured bio, but that quote would work great for February: \"the end of a fortnight's bloody fighting there is no longer any doubt that Iwo is the most difficult amphibious operation in U.S. history.\" As far as images go, I've had to change January's twice now... sheesh. ''' +++$+++ :I dunno. I've never heard of him, though that isn't saying much. I don't see a huge USMC connection with him by looking at his article... I wouldn't use him as the featured bio, but that quote would work great for February: "the end of a fortnight's bloody fighting there is no longer any doubt that Iwo is the most difficult amphibious operation in U.S. history." As far as images go, I've had to change January's twice now... sheesh. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  00:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
527146 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527144 +++$+++ 527145 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.228121460E09 +++$+++ Ah, that makes more sense. I didn't get that level of import from the article... I dunno how you would convey that sense of import off the top of my head. Your logic makes sense, and I suppose you were entirely correct. As always, I trust in your judgement. ''' +++$+++ ::Ah, that makes more sense. I didn't get that level of import from the article... I dunno how you would convey that sense of import off the top of my head. Your logic makes sense, and I suppose you were entirely correct. As always, I trust in your judgement. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  00:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
527147 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527144 +++$+++ 527146 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.228125660E09 +++$+++ If I might make a suggestion: in March, I'm featuring [[Uniforms of the United States Marine Corps]] and the image is a great one of the [[:Image:USMC running suit.jpg|new PT uniform]]. Following that \"uniform\" theme, it'd be great if you could pic a bio of a Marine sporting a historic uniform. For example: [[Henry L. Hulbert]]. ''' +++$+++ :::If I might make a suggestion: in March, I'm featuring [[Uniforms of the United States Marine Corps]] and the image is a great one of the [[:Image:USMC running suit.jpg|new PT uniform]]. Following that "uniform" theme, it'd be great if you could pic a bio of a Marine sporting a historic uniform. For example: [[Henry L. Hulbert]]. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  02:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
527148 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527144 +++$+++ 527147 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.228180680E09 +++$+++ I have another suggestion: [[Douglas A. Zembiec]] is a great article, and its got ''lots'' of references. The \"Lion of Fallujah\" has gained some great fame amongst the circles I associate with, and I'd love to see him get some recognition soon. ''' +++$+++ ::::I have another suggestion: [[Douglas A. Zembiec]] is a great article, and its got ''lots'' of references. The "Lion of Fallujah" has gained some great fame amongst the circles I associate with, and I'd love to see him get some recognition soon. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  17:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

2857 +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-01 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.301719740E09 +++$+++ ~Hi there. I've responded on the article's talk page.  +++$+++ ~Hi there. I've responded on the article's talk page. [[User:Eik Corell|Eik Corell]] ([[User talk:Eik Corell#top|talk]]) 21:49, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
2858 +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2857 +++$+++ 2857 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.301971920E09 +++$+++ You're putting [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]] on details that are not about the game as much as they're about the people who made the game. That's why I removed it.  +++$+++ :You're putting [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]] on details that are not about the game as much as they're about the people who made the game. That's why I removed it. [[User:Eik Corell|Eik Corell]] ([[User talk:Eik Corell#top|talk]]) 19:52, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
2859 +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2857 +++$+++ 2857 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.301973720E09 +++$+++ The article is about the game, not the team. Putting \"undue weight\" means that one gives special attention to something that is trivial. For example, a video game article needs info about who made the game. However, if you start putting in lists of the individual people involved in the development, you have have entered [[WP:UNDUE]]'s territory.  +++$+++ :The article is about the game, not the team. Putting "undue weight" means that one gives special attention to something that is trivial. For example, a video game article needs info about who made the game. However, if you start putting in lists of the individual people involved in the development, you have have entered [[WP:UNDUE]]'s territory. [[User:Eik Corell|Eik Corell]] ([[User talk:Eik Corell#top|talk]]) 20:22, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

2860 +++$+++ Billy Bread +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-10 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.302485040E09 +++$+++ Can't have a description of the active efforts of a community which develops patches?  +++$+++ Can't have a description of the active efforts of a community which develops patches? [[User:Billy Bread|Billy Bread]] ([[User talk:Billy Bread|talk]]) 18:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
2861 +++$+++ Zakhalesh +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2860 +++$+++ 2860 +++$+++ 2011-04-10 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.302486240E09 +++$+++ {{tps}} As said by Eik Corell in their edit summary, discuss this in the article's talk page. Thank you.  +++$+++ :{{tps}} As said by Eik Corell in their edit summary, discuss this in the article's talk page. Thank you. [[User:Zakhalesh|Zakhalesh]] ([[User talk:Zakhalesh|talk]]) 18:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
2862 +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2860 +++$+++ 2860 +++$+++ 2011-04-15 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.302900000E09 +++$+++ I'm not really sure. It doesn't have enough info to qualify under the criteria that it offers more information than the article at the current time can provide, and the information it does have qualifies as [[WP:GAMEGUIDE|gamecruft]] and [[WP:GAMEGUIDE|gameguide]] material. Per [[WP:FANSITE]], the only way I can see a possibility of this being included would be if this was written by a [[WP:RS|recognized authority]], and being a fansite, that doesn't seem to be the case.  +++$+++ :I'm not really sure. It doesn't have enough info to qualify under the criteria that it offers more information than the article at the current time can provide, and the information it does have qualifies as [[WP:GAMEGUIDE|gamecruft]] and [[WP:GAMEGUIDE|gameguide]] material. Per [[WP:FANSITE]], the only way I can see a possibility of this being included would be if this was written by a [[WP:RS|recognized authority]], and being a fansite, that doesn't seem to be the case. [[User:Eik Corell|Eik Corell]] ([[User talk:Eik Corell#top|talk]]) 13:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
2863 +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2860 +++$+++ 2860 +++$+++ 2011-04-16 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.302993360E09 +++$+++ Outlasting the competition doesn't mean that one fansite is authoritative(or more authoritative) than another. And by whom is this site regarded to be such? A quick google search doesn't reveal any major publications or anything to that effect mentioning this site as such. Now, the websites on the Sauerbraten are appropriate because they're all official. The problem with linking to unofficial websites or projects that haven't received coverage in reliable, third-party sources, is two-fold: The first is [[WP:SPAM|spam]] concerns, the second is that of putting [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]] on info that only benefits players of the game, or the people who are associated with the site, which goes back to the spam thing.  +++$+++ :Outlasting the competition doesn't mean that one fansite is authoritative(or more authoritative) than another. And by whom is this site regarded to be such? A quick google search doesn't reveal any major publications or anything to that effect mentioning this site as such. Now, the websites on the Sauerbraten are appropriate because they're all official. The problem with linking to unofficial websites or projects that haven't received coverage in reliable, third-party sources, is two-fold: The first is [[WP:SPAM|spam]] concerns, the second is that of putting [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]] on info that only benefits players of the game, or the people who are associated with the site, which goes back to the spam thing. [[User:Eik Corell|Eik Corell]] ([[User talk:Eik Corell#top|talk]]) 15:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
2864 +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2860 +++$+++ 2860 +++$+++ 2011-04-24 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.303704840E09 +++$+++ So you see, in contacting them, any coverage they might give the website would be tainted. But in any case, there's a list of reliable sources typically used for video game articles [[WP:VG\/S|here]].  +++$+++ :So you see, in contacting them, any coverage they might give the website would be tainted. But in any case, there's a list of reliable sources typically used for video game articles [[WP:VG/S|here]]. [[User:Eik Corell|Eik Corell]] ([[User talk:Eik Corell#top|talk]]) 21:14, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

527150 +++$+++ BorgQueen +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-03 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.228342860E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] -->  +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> [[User:BorgQueen|BorgQueen]] ([[User talk:BorgQueen|talk]]) 14:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
527151 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527150 +++$+++ 527150 +++$+++ 2008-12-04 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.228396620E09 +++$+++ JRH95, where did you get your information from? Every elementry child in the United States knows that you can not run and much less be nominated for president of the United States unless you are born in there. That is a fact.  +++$+++ *JRH95, where did you get your information from? Every elementry child in the United States knows that you can not run and much less be nominated for president of the United States unless you are born in there. That is a fact. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 05:17, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
527152 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527150 +++$+++ 527151 +++$+++ 2008-12-05 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.228478460E09 +++$+++ In case you hadn't noticed, that guy nominated himself for admin upon his 4th edit here. He was also slapped down for trying to change the Obama article to claim there's a controversy about his birth certificate; which there isn't, except in the minds of a few conspiracy theorists.  +++$+++ **In case you hadn't noticed, that guy nominated himself for admin upon his 4th edit here. He was also slapped down for trying to change the Obama article to claim there's a controversy about his birth certificate; which there isn't, except in the minds of a few conspiracy theorists. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 04:01, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

2865 +++$+++ KL Joe +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2865 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-15 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.302870120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:KL Joe|KL Joe]] ([[User talk:KL Joe|talk]]) 05:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
2866 +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2865 +++$+++ 2865 +++$+++ 2011-04-15 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.302900720E09 +++$+++ Linking to a sandbox page in a real Wikipedia article is never acceptable because the purpose of the sandbox is for users to experiment. The article in question was deleted, and seems to have reappeared on a user's sandbox, and after that, it was added again in this form. This can constitute [[WP:GAME|gaming the system]]. Wikipedia articles are usually deleted because they lack [[WP:N|notability]](Thai version here: [http:\/\/th.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B5%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%A2:%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%B7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%84%E0%B8%82%E0%B9%83%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%A7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%B2%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9B%E0%B9%87%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B8%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%A1]).  +++$+++ :Linking to a sandbox page in a real Wikipedia article is never acceptable because the purpose of the sandbox is for users to experiment. The article in question was deleted, and seems to have reappeared on a user's sandbox, and after that, it was added again in this form. This can constitute [[WP:GAME|gaming the system]]. Wikipedia articles are usually deleted because they lack [[WP:N|notability]](Thai version here: [http://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B5%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%A2:%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%B7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%84%E0%B8%82%E0%B9%83%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%A7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%B2%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9B%E0%B9%87%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B8%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%A1]). [[User:Eik Corell|Eik Corell]] ([[User talk:Eik Corell#top|talk]]) 13:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

2867 +++$+++ KL Joe +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-22 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.303485480E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:KL Joe|KL Joe]] ([[User talk:KL Joe|talk]]) 08:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
2868 +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2867 +++$+++ 2867 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.303628040E09 +++$+++ Please assume good faith here - I'm not trying to provoke anyone. Anyway, I've posted about this issue on the [[WP:VG\/GL]], which is probably where we should have taken this to begin with. With you saying one thing, and another guy on that talk page saying something else, I'm still left unsure. I'm gonna disengage, which I should have done long before I violated the 3RR.  +++$+++ :Please assume good faith here - I'm not trying to provoke anyone. Anyway, I've posted about this issue on the [[WP:VG/GL]], which is probably where we should have taken this to begin with. With you saying one thing, and another guy on that talk page saying something else, I'm still left unsure. I'm gonna disengage, which I should have done long before I violated the 3RR. [[User:Eik Corell|Eik Corell]] ([[User talk:Eik Corell#top|talk]]) 23:54, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

527156 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527156 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-07 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.228645920E09 +++$+++ Received your e-mail and I'm O.K. with your thoughts. Good sound reasoning.  +++$+++ Received your e-mail and I'm O.K. with your thoughts. Good sound reasoning. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 02:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
527157 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527156 +++$+++ 527156 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.228657200E09 +++$+++ The article looks great now. Did you receive my e-mail? I told the PR government about him and they will honor him. Nice, right?  +++$+++ *The article looks great now. Did you receive my e-mail? I told the PR government about him and they will honor him. Nice, right? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 05:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

265013 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-30 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.188518880E09 +++$+++ I reworded or removed some of the recent additions you made to [[New Age]] ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=New_Age&diff=154629139&oldid=154615342 thus]).  Part is to avoid the use of the second person as per [[Wikipedia:Guide_to_writing_better_articles#Tone|WP:TONE]].  Also, several of the references you added to the page didn't seem to support the information they were paired with barring some deductive leaps, which put it into the territory of [[WP:OR|original research]].   +++$+++ I reworded or removed some of the recent additions you made to [[New Age]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_Age&diff=154629139&oldid=154615342 thus]).  Part is to avoid the use of the second person as per [[Wikipedia:Guide_to_writing_better_articles#Tone|WP:TONE]].  Also, several of the references you added to the page didn't seem to support the information they were paired with barring some deductive leaps, which put it into the territory of [[WP:OR|original research]].  [[User:WLU|WLU]] 17:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
265014 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265013 +++$+++ 265013 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.188532980E09 +++$+++ I will reword them to fit the guidelines.  +++$+++ :I will reword them to fit the guidelines. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 21:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

2870 +++$+++ Bill +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2870 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-08 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.304903400E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've reverted your removal of the [[Dune II]] link. I've read through it and it has a lot of useful information, and it's also a professionally published source. Ideally the information contained in the magazine will be worked into the wiki article but for now I'd say it's suitable as an external link. -- +++$+++ Hi, I've reverted your removal of the [[Dune II]] link. I've read through it and it has a lot of useful information, and it's also a professionally published source. Ideally the information contained in the magazine will be worked into the wiki article but for now I'd say it's suitable as an external link. --[[User:Bill|Bill]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User_talk:Bill|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Bill|contribs]])</sup> 18:10, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
2871 +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2870 +++$+++ 2870 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.304941980E09 +++$+++ Hey there. I made a mistake -- I assumed the guy who was adding the links was spamming since he added articles on the same website to a lot of other articles, but when I got through half of his edits, he had added articles from other sites such as eurogamer. I'm at fault here for not assuming good faith, so sorry about that.  +++$+++ :Hey there. I made a mistake -- I assumed the guy who was adding the links was spamming since he added articles on the same website to a lot of other articles, but when I got through half of his edits, he had added articles from other sites such as eurogamer. I'm at fault here for not assuming good faith, so sorry about that. [[User:Eik Corell|Eik Corell]] ([[User talk:Eik Corell#top|talk]]) 04:53, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
2872 +++$+++ Bill +++$+++ Eik Corell +++$+++ 2870 +++$+++ 2871 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.304969460E09 +++$+++ Not a problem. No worries. -- +++$+++ ::Not a problem. No worries. --[[User:Bill|Bill]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User_talk:Bill|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Bill|contribs]])</sup> 12:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

612148 +++$+++ Mikkerpikker +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612148 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-05 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.139136900E09 +++$+++ That\u2019s still not quite right but I can\u2019t think of anything better (\u201chighlighted\u201d instead of \u201cpointed out\u201d maybe). Let me know what you think,  +++$+++ That’s still not quite right but I can’t think of anything better (“highlighted” instead of “pointed out” maybe). Let me know what you think, [[User:Mikkerpikker|Mikkerpikker]] [[User talk:Mikkerpikker|...]] 02:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
612149 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612148 +++$+++ 612148 +++$+++ 2006-02-05 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.139158260E09 +++$+++ The \"particularly\" may be unnecessary, I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. .... +++$+++ :The "particularly" may be unnecessary, I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. ....[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]]: [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 08:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
612150 +++$+++ Mikkerpikker +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612148 +++$+++ 612149 +++$+++ 2006-02-06 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.139248860E09 +++$+++ I like it! In fact, I think I'm gonna go change the article to reflect your proposed change... (think \"particularly\" is not stricly speaking necessary but ok in context).  +++$+++ ::I like it! In fact, I think I'm gonna go change the article to reflect your proposed change... (think "particularly" is not stricly speaking necessary but ok in context). [[User:Mikkerpikker|Mikkerpikker]] [[User talk:Mikkerpikker|...]] 10:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

527162 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527162 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-12 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.229137920E09 +++$+++ Are you interested in coordinating? If you are not, do you have any advice for me (I'm sure there is some WPBIO guideline I'm overlooking). ''' +++$+++ Are you interested in coordinating? If you are not, do you have any advice for me (I'm sure there is some WPBIO guideline I'm overlooking). '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  19:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
527163 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527162 +++$+++ 527162 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.229233200E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry to hear that you'll have limited time. I have started with USMC commandants, and already have run into a problem: [[Alfred M. Gray, Jr.]]'s list is obviously incomplete (there arent even any campaign medals). I've done some looking, but all of his bios online only list personal awards, and I cannot find a photo of him wearing any uniform but utilities (to check his ribbons)! Do you think you might be able to help within a few days? ''' +++$+++ :I'm sorry to hear that you'll have limited time. I have started with USMC commandants, and already have run into a problem: [[Alfred M. Gray, Jr.]]'s list is obviously incomplete (there arent even any campaign medals). I've done some looking, but all of his bios online only list personal awards, and I cannot find a photo of him wearing any uniform but utilities (to check his ribbons)! Do you think you might be able to help within a few days? '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  21:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
527164 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527162 +++$+++ 527163 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.229300940E09 +++$+++ If you could figure out a way to pipe a link with an image, that would simplify everything... It would also look great. Alas, I know of no such way. Perhaps there is a template out there, waiting to be found? ''' +++$+++ ::If you could figure out a way to pipe a link with an image, that would simplify everything... It would also look great. Alas, I know of no such way. Perhaps there is a template out there, waiting to be found? '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  16:29, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
527165 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527162 +++$+++ 527164 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.229301480E09 +++$+++ That's fine with me. I'll leave the name tables uncentered... most of them stretch across the whole screen anyway. ''' +++$+++ :::That's fine with me. I'll leave the name tables uncentered... most of them stretch across the whole screen anyway. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  16:38, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

2878 +++$+++ BlisterD +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-28 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.246204440E09 +++$+++ IMDB lists Eclipse as pre-production and Breaking Dawn as in development. Official summit entertainment site has Eclipse in news section with director and release date announced. Therefore preperations are obviously already being made for it so \"crystal ball\" doesn`t work here or i missed something in that description. I don`t see any info on official site about Breaking Dawn so it could be removed. I`ll wait for you response before changing anything as to avoid pointless \"edit wars\" or whatever they are called.  -- +++$+++ IMDB lists Eclipse as pre-production and Breaking Dawn as in development. Official summit entertainment site has Eclipse in news section with director and release date announced. Therefore preperations are obviously already being made for it so "crystal ball" doesn`t work here or i missed something in that description. I don`t see any info on official site about Breaking Dawn so it could be removed. I`ll wait for you response before changing anything as to avoid pointless "edit wars" or whatever they are called.  --[[User:BlisterD|BlisterD]] ([[User talk:BlisterD|talk]]) 08:54, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
2879 +++$+++ BlisterD +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2878 +++$+++ 2878 +++$+++ 2009-06-28 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.246244040E09 +++$+++ I agree that IMDB isn`t that reliable, it can be edited by random users also, yes? As for Eclipse, i guess i`ll just wait untill it gets its own article here and then will put it back, won`t take that long imo =] -- +++$+++ : I agree that IMDB isn`t that reliable, it can be edited by random users also, yes? As for Eclipse, i guess i`ll just wait untill it gets its own article here and then will put it back, won`t take that long imo =] --[[User:BlisterD|BlisterD]] ([[User talk:BlisterD|talk]]) 19:54, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

2881 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.251454740E09 +++$+++ Per: <span class=\"plainlinks\">[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Robert_Pattinson&curid=24041298&diff=310483130&oldid=310462537 this edit]<\/span>. I couldn't figure out the precise wording. ''People'' '''named''' him \"''Sexiest Man Alive''\" and ''Glamour'' '''voted''' him that. '''<small> +++$+++ Per: <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Pattinson&curid=24041298&diff=310483130&oldid=310462537 this edit]</span>. I couldn't figure out the precise wording. ''People'' '''named''' him "''Sexiest Man Alive''" and ''Glamour'' '''voted''' him that. '''<small>[[User:Scarce|<font color="gray">• S • C</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="gray"> • A • R</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="gray"> • C • E •</font>]]</small>''' 03:19, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
2882 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2881 +++$+++ 2881 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.251455220E09 +++$+++ Perfect '''<small> +++$+++ :Perfect '''<small>[[User:Scarce|<font color="gray">• S • C</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="gray"> • A • R</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="gray"> • C • E •</font>]]</small>''' 03:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
2883 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2881 +++$+++ 2882 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.251457080E09 +++$+++ Per: <span class=\"plainlinks\">[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Twilight_(series)&diff=next&oldid=310484912 this edit]<\/span>. Saying unpublished implies the book will never be published, which Meyer has never said '''<small> +++$+++ ::Per: <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Twilight_(series)&diff=next&oldid=310484912 this edit]</span>. Saying unpublished implies the book will never be published, which Meyer has never said '''<small>[[User:Scarce|<font color="gray">• S • C</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="gray"> • A • R</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="gray"> • C • E •</font>]]</small>''' 03:58, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
2884 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2881 +++$+++ 2883 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.251460320E09 +++$+++ \"True enough\" '''<small> +++$+++ :::"True enough" '''<small>[[User:Scarce|<font color="gray">• S • C</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="gray"> • A • R</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="gray"> • C • E •</font>]]</small>''' 04:52, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

527170 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-17 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.229507460E09 +++$+++ Sounds like a fine idea. I'll get on it. ''' +++$+++ Sounds like a fine idea. I'll get on it. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  01:51, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
527171 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527170 +++$+++ 527170 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.229509320E09 +++$+++ That is a '''''great''''' image. You can actually see the insignia I left there in 2005: Lance Corporal, between the General and Chief Petty Officer on the left. I wonder if my dog tags are still there... ''' +++$+++ :That is a '''''great''''' image. You can actually see the insignia I left there in 2005: Lance Corporal, between the General and Chief Petty Officer on the left. I wonder if my dog tags are still there... '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  02:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
527172 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527170 +++$+++ 527171 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.229509500E09 +++$+++ Too late, I just finished. ''' +++$+++ ::Too late, I just finished. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  02:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
527173 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527170 +++$+++ 527172 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.229510580E09 +++$+++ And no, I'm not aware of whose stars those are... they weren't too tarnished, so I imagine they weren't more than ten or so years old perhaps. I got a juveniele thrill from overlapping them a bit with my crossed rifles... ''' +++$+++ :::And no, I'm not aware of whose stars those are... they weren't too tarnished, so I imagine they weren't more than ten or so years old perhaps. I got a juveniele thrill from overlapping them a bit with my crossed rifles... '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  02:43, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
527174 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527170 +++$+++ 527173 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.229512680E09 +++$+++ Hm. Well, I could care less about my chevron, it's certainly irrelevant to the portal and any other article. However, the black and white image is more poignient (spelling?) in my opinion. It's also a wider shot, showing more of the board. Its also a bit busier--more crowded, more interesting. It is remarkable, though... the two are almost identical in placement, but the subject is so different. It can get windy, and so many insignia have fallen off and been added... perhaps we could do both: a then and now? If not, my vote lies with [[:File:IwoJima Homage Insignia Devices.jpg]].  ''' +++$+++ ::::Hm. Well, I could care less about my chevron, it's certainly irrelevant to the portal and any other article. However, the black and white image is more poignient (spelling?) in my opinion. It's also a wider shot, showing more of the board. Its also a bit busier--more crowded, more interesting. It is remarkable, though... the two are almost identical in placement, but the subject is so different. It can get windy, and so many insignia have fallen off and been added... perhaps we could do both: a then and now? If not, my vote lies with [[:File:IwoJima Homage Insignia Devices.jpg]].  '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  03:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
527175 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527170 +++$+++ 527174 +++$+++ 2008-12-18 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.229632500E09 +++$+++ You and I, sir, think alike (like all great minds, I suppose). I used to have that Doonesbury cartoon tacked to the wall in my office. As long as we don't make it a constant thing, a [[WP:BJAODN|little humor now and then]] never hurt anyone. As far as the Iwo Jima article is concerned: it is a good idea, but I have no sources other than the images. ''' +++$+++ :::::You and I, sir, think alike (like all great minds, I suppose). I used to have that Doonesbury cartoon tacked to the wall in my office. As long as we don't make it a constant thing, a [[WP:BJAODN|little humor now and then]] never hurt anyone. As far as the Iwo Jima article is concerned: it is a good idea, but I have no sources other than the images. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  12:35, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
527176 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527170 +++$+++ 527175 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.229892840E09 +++$+++ Also, thanks for that revert on my talk page, but I'd just as soon keep it. I rarely delete user talk content, even if this anon is trying to get my goat. Not really sure why or in reference to what... ''' +++$+++ ::::::Also, thanks for that revert on my talk page, but I'd just as soon keep it. I rarely delete user talk content, even if this anon is trying to get my goat. Not really sure why or in reference to what... '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  12:54, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

2885 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-30 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.251638280E09 +++$+++ Per: <span class=\"plainlinks\">[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_Twilight_cast_members&diff=prev&oldid=310831123 your recent edits]<\/span>. I said \"'''a''' film adaption [...] is expected...\" because according to the article, Summit hasn't \"greenlit the project\"; and of course, I unwiki-linked one of the Robert Pattinson's because its linked twice before that one is '''<small> +++$+++ Per: <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Twilight_cast_members&diff=prev&oldid=310831123 your recent edits]</span>. I said "'''a''' film adaption [...] is expected..." because according to the article, Summit hasn't "greenlit the project"; and of course, I unwiki-linked one of the Robert Pattinson's because its linked twice before that one is '''<small>[[User:Scarce|<font color="gray">• S • C</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="gray"> • A • R</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="gray"> • C • E •</font>]]</small>''' 06:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
2886 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2885 +++$+++ 2885 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.251711540E09 +++$+++ Oh, I see you did that now! I thought that sounded a little odd [[File:Smiley.svg|17px|link=]]. Don't know how I missed that! '''<small> +++$+++ :Oh, I see you did that now! I thought that sounded a little odd [[File:Smiley.svg|17px|link=]]. Don't know how I missed that! '''<small>[[User:Scarce|<font color="gray">• S • C</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="gray"> • A • R</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="gray"> • C • E •</font>]]</small>''' 02:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
2887 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2885 +++$+++ 2886 +++$+++ 2009-09-05 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.252140420E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to thank you for <span class=\"plainlinks\">[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Portal:Twilight\/Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=311914668 this edit]<\/span>. I completely forgot to look for a source '''<small> +++$+++ ::I just wanted to thank you for <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Twilight/Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=311914668 this edit]</span>. I completely forgot to look for a source '''<small>[[User:Scarce|<font color="gray">• S • C</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="gray"> • A • R</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="gray"> • C • E •</font>]]</small>''' 01:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
2888 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2885 +++$+++ 2887 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.254053700E09 +++$+++ It looks like we both reverted the vandalism at [[Midnight Sun (novel)]] at the same time. I undid the edit then went to the talk page of the vandal to see you already left a message, I went back to the article to see no edits occurred after the vandalism, I checked my contributions and the edit wasn't there, I went back to my watchlist and saw you had performed the edit. The vandalism sits there and 2 hours later and we both notice it at the exact same time! :P  +++$+++ :::It looks like we both reverted the vandalism at [[Midnight Sun (novel)]] at the same time. I undid the edit then went to the talk page of the vandal to see you already left a message, I went back to the article to see no edits occurred after the vandalism, I checked my contributions and the edit wasn't there, I went back to my watchlist and saw you had performed the edit. The vandalism sits there and 2 hours later and we both notice it at the exact same time! :P [[User:Scarce|<font color="RoyalBlue">$©</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="Blue">@®</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="DarkBlue">©Ξ</font>]] 05:15, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

527177 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-21 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.229894340E09 +++$+++ Yes, I found the same thing myself with the articles as well. There are so many great topics, but they are limited by what has been done. However, Wikipedia can only improve in the interveneing months, and the articles and bios we want to feature will get better until they are of the caliber needed to be featured on the portal. If not, a little cleanup and we can easily improve it to at least B-class. ''' +++$+++ Yes, I found the same thing myself with the articles as well. There are so many great topics, but they are limited by what has been done. However, Wikipedia can only improve in the interveneing months, and the articles and bios we want to feature will get better until they are of the caliber needed to be featured on the portal. If not, a little cleanup and we can easily improve it to at least B-class. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  13:19, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
527178 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527177 +++$+++ 527177 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.229982540E09 +++$+++ Regarding [[Portal:United States Marine Corps\/picture\/2011September]]: ''huh?!'' A Marine Corps F-18 from a Navy squadron? I think the photographer screwed up the caption, and I doubt that it's a Marine aircraft... perhaps a Marine in the pilots seat. In any case, it's probably not ideal for the USMC portal, unless we can clear out who and what it actually is. ''' +++$+++ :Regarding [[Portal:United States Marine Corps/picture/2011September]]: ''huh?!'' A Marine Corps F-18 from a Navy squadron? I think the photographer screwed up the caption, and I doubt that it's a Marine aircraft... perhaps a Marine in the pilots seat. In any case, it's probably not ideal for the USMC portal, unless we can clear out who and what it actually is. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  13:49, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
527179 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527177 +++$+++ 527178 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.230064560E09 +++$+++ One thing I'd like to see is a great OIF combat photo for March 2013. I know that's looking ''WAAAYY'' ahead, but I'd like to get a photo from 2003 that has bullets flying to commemorate the 10 year anniversary. ''' +++$+++ ::One thing I'd like to see is a great OIF combat photo for March 2013. I know that's looking ''WAAAYY'' ahead, but I'd like to get a photo from 2003 that has bullets flying to commemorate the 10 year anniversary. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  12:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
527180 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527177 +++$+++ 527179 +++$+++ 2008-12-25 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.230210600E09 +++$+++ Also, nice idea with that DYK... I never would have thought to do that. I'm so tired now... G'night, merry Christmas, etc. ''' +++$+++ :::Also, nice idea with that DYK... I never would have thought to do that. I'm so tired now... G'night, merry Christmas, etc. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  05:10, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

612151 +++$+++ Cactus.man +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612151 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-12 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.139782380E09 +++$+++ Hi Dave, Kilcreggan now has a pier! Also, that's a nice range of photos you've supplied for the [[Newark Castle, Port Glasgow]] article. BTW, to save an image from Geograph to your HD, just right click on it and select \"save image as\" or whatever equivalent your browser calls the command. Cheers. --<font color=\"2B7A2B\"> +++$+++ Hi Dave, Kilcreggan now has a pier! Also, that's a nice range of photos you've supplied for the [[Newark Castle, Port Glasgow]] article. BTW, to save an image from Geograph to your HD, just right click on it and select "save image as" or whatever equivalent your browser calls the command. Cheers. --<font color="2B7A2B">[[User:Cactus.man|Cactus<b>.</b>man]]</font> <font size="4">[[User talk:Cactus.man|&#9997;]]</font> 14:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
612152 +++$+++ Cactus.man +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612151 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-12 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.139787720E09 +++$+++ Will do, thanks for the offer. And I have to say \"Good Grief !\", a one-button mouse? Surely worthy of an article due to notability as the first mouse in history to qualify for a [[bus pass]] ''':'''-) --<font color=\"2B7A2B\"> +++$+++ ::Will do, thanks for the offer. And I have to say "Good Grief !", a one-button mouse? Surely worthy of an article due to notability as the first mouse in history to qualify for a [[bus pass]] ''':'''-) --<font color="2B7A2B">[[User:Cactus.man|Cactus<b>.</b>man]]</font> <font size="4">[[User talk:Cactus.man|&#9997;]]</font> 15:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

527181 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-23 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.230065280E09 +++$+++ <nowiki>:D<\/nowiki> It's good to see initiative like that. Would you like me to help? ''' +++$+++ <nowiki>:D</nowiki> It's good to see initiative like that. Would you like me to help? '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  12:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
527182 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527181 +++$+++ 527181 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.230070800E09 +++$+++ I've left a note on a couple editor's talk pages, but I don't expect too much interest. I've also left a note at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history\/United States military history task force#USAF portal]], but I expect a lack of enthusiasm from any subject matter experts. If nobody is interested in taking stewardship of it, I would love to tackle this project as well (two back-to-back 96s for Christmas and New Years, I expect to be bored quickly). ''' +++$+++ :I've left a note on a couple editor's talk pages, but I don't expect too much interest. I've also left a note at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/United States military history task force#USAF portal]], but I expect a lack of enthusiasm from any subject matter experts. If nobody is interested in taking stewardship of it, I would love to tackle this project as well (two back-to-back 96s for Christmas and New Years, I expect to be bored quickly). '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  14:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
527183 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527181 +++$+++ 527182 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.230086280E09 +++$+++ Once again, I feel the same way: I learn so much through Wikipedia. Often when I'm browsing, I'll open a new tab from a link that looks interesting, and before I know it, there are thirty tabs open and I've spent an hour just reading articles. Also note that I was being slightly sarcastic about being bored; I chose not to put in for pre-deployment leave due to the holiday breaks, so this is my time to spend with the wife. Ironically, there is a grain of truth: we don't have much money until my next paycheck to do anything, so we'll probably stay at home and get bored quickly. I any case, I do anticipate spending at least a couple days worth of sitting on the couch in my boxers doing nothing but editing and playing video games on the laptop; but that could change depending on what gifts I open on Thursday. ''' +++$+++ ::Once again, I feel the same way: I learn so much through Wikipedia. Often when I'm browsing, I'll open a new tab from a link that looks interesting, and before I know it, there are thirty tabs open and I've spent an hour just reading articles. Also note that I was being slightly sarcastic about being bored; I chose not to put in for pre-deployment leave due to the holiday breaks, so this is my time to spend with the wife. Ironically, there is a grain of truth: we don't have much money until my next paycheck to do anything, so we'll probably stay at home and get bored quickly. I any case, I do anticipate spending at least a couple days worth of sitting on the couch in my boxers doing nothing but editing and playing video games on the laptop; but that could change depending on what gifts I open on Thursday. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  18:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

2895 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-22 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.256229420E09 +++$+++ See the ''New Moon'' [[:File:Bella Swan.jpg|Bella Swan]] and [[:File:EdwardCullen.jpg|Edward Cullen pictures]] I found? It's exactly what I've been looking for! If we can only find a similar one for Jacob. Also, there's another ''New Moon'' [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/v3jPXWkXUlU trailer] out. Like I said though, keep your eyes peeled for a good Jacob Black photo if you can. Thanks  +++$+++ See the ''New Moon'' [[:File:Bella Swan.jpg|Bella Swan]] and [[:File:EdwardCullen.jpg|Edward Cullen pictures]] I found? It's exactly what I've been looking for! If we can only find a similar one for Jacob. Also, there's another ''New Moon'' [http://www.youtube.com/v/v3jPXWkXUlU trailer] out. Like I said though, keep your eyes peeled for a good Jacob Black photo if you can. Thanks [[User:Scarce|<font color="RoyalBlue">$©</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="Blue">@®</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="DarkBlue">©Ξ</font>]] 09:37, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
2896 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2895 +++$+++ 2895 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.256271780E09 +++$+++ That one's perfect, but yeah, the source is kind of iffy.  +++$+++ :That one's perfect, but yeah, the source is kind of iffy. [[User:Scarce|<font color="RoyalBlue">$©</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="Blue">@®</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="DarkBlue">©Ξ</font>]] 21:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
2897 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2895 +++$+++ 2896 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.256295240E09 +++$+++ Another problem is [[:File:The Cullens.jpg|the characters pic]]. It just shows the Cullens. Hopefully, now that ''New Moon'' is coming out we will get a new group photo. I searched, and couldn't find one.  +++$+++ ::Another problem is [[:File:The Cullens.jpg|the characters pic]]. It just shows the Cullens. Hopefully, now that ''New Moon'' is coming out we will get a new group photo. I searched, and couldn't find one. [[User:Scarce|<font color="RoyalBlue">$©</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="Blue">@®</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="DarkBlue">©Ξ</font>]] 03:54, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
2898 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2895 +++$+++ 2897 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.256296020E09 +++$+++ The one we have now for Jacob Black is too \"screen-grabby\". I say upload it, (not override [[:File:Jacob Black.jpg|the current one]]), use it and then if [[User:Pais|the user]] who uploaded the original doesn't complain after a couple of days, we tag it for deletion.  +++$+++ :::The one we have now for Jacob Black is too "screen-grabby". I say upload it, (not override [[:File:Jacob Black.jpg|the current one]]), use it and then if [[User:Pais|the user]] who uploaded the original doesn't complain after a couple of days, we tag it for deletion. [[User:Scarce|<font color="RoyalBlue">$©</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="Blue">@®</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="DarkBlue">©Ξ</font>]] 04:07, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
2899 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2895 +++$+++ 2898 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.256296380E09 +++$+++ I'd say the second one do the first one's shaky source  +++$+++ ::::I'd say the second one do the first one's shaky source [[User:Scarce|<font color="RoyalBlue">$©</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="Blue">@®</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="DarkBlue">©Ξ</font>]] 04:13, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
2900 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2895 +++$+++ 2899 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.256297400E09 +++$+++ Now that I see it actually cropped, I like it a lot.  +++$+++ :::::Now that I see it actually cropped, I like it a lot. [[User:Scarce|<font color="RoyalBlue">$©</font>]][[User talk:Scarce|<font color="Blue">@®</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="DarkBlue">©Ξ</font>]] 04:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

527184 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-24 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.230153300E09 +++$+++ Not sure what you mean by extra white space. I see nothing in IE7 tht I didn't see before, but I suppose I can try deleting extra line breaks and let me know if that helps. ''' +++$+++ Not sure what you mean by extra white space. I see nothing in IE7 tht I didn't see before, but I suppose I can try deleting extra line breaks and let me know if that helps. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  13:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
527185 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527184 +++$+++ 527184 +++$+++ 2008-12-24 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.230154020E09 +++$+++ Oh, and old template is just what it sounds like: the old page we used to manually update each month, but is no longer transcluded on the portal. If you want, you can delete it, or keep it for the page history. I've removed extra line breaks, let me know if that helps. ''' +++$+++ :Oh, and old template is just what it sounds like: the old page we used to manually update each month, but is no longer transcluded on the portal. If you want, you can delete it, or keep it for the page history. I've removed extra line breaks, let me know if that helps. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  13:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

527186 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-24 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.230170220E09 +++$+++ Enough eggnog! God bless! ''' +++$+++ Enough eggnog! God bless! '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  17:57, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
527187 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527186 +++$+++ 527186 +++$+++ 2008-12-25 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.230198780E09 +++$+++ Uh, yeah, sorry, my eggnog was about 75% brandy. ''' +++$+++ :Uh, yeah, sorry, my eggnog was about 75% brandy. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  01:53, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
527188 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527186 +++$+++ 527186 +++$+++ 2008-12-25 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.230200460E09 +++$+++ Here's something: [http:\/\/www.templelodge14.org\/famousfreemasons.html] I dunno how relevant being a [[Freemasonry|Freemason]] is to a biography, but it is interesting how many notable Marines were Masons. ''' +++$+++ :Here's something: [http://www.templelodge14.org/famousfreemasons.html] I dunno how relevant being a [[Freemasonry|Freemason]] is to a biography, but it is interesting how many notable Marines were Masons. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  02:21, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

265045 +++$+++ Epbr123 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265045 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-05 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.196888880E09 +++$+++ Hi. I just wondered if you'd consider letting me nominate you for adminship, as I think you're experienced enough. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. I just wondered if you'd consider letting me nominate you for adminship, as I think you're experienced enough. Thanks. [[User:Epbr123|Epbr123]] ([[User talk:Epbr123|talk]]) 13:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
265046 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265045 +++$+++ 265045 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.197058320E09 +++$+++ Epbr123, Thanks for the offer. Please go ahead. I have more time available at the moment so would be able to take on some admin duties.    +++$+++ : Epbr123, Thanks for the offer. Please go ahead. I have more time available at the moment so would be able to take on some admin duties.   [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]]  12:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

527191 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527191 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-30 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.230668700E09 +++$+++ What do you want thoughts on the portal about? ''' +++$+++ What do you want thoughts on the portal about? '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  12:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
527192 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527191 +++$+++ 527191 +++$+++ 2009-01-01 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.230805800E09 +++$+++ The portal update seemed to roll in perfectly smooth (the server being on UTC, midnight passed a couple hours ago). I think we can safely assume they will work without monitoring from now on.<BR>Happy New Year! Best wishes for all to come in 2009! ''' +++$+++ :The portal update seemed to roll in perfectly smooth (the server being on UTC, midnight passed a couple hours ago). I think we can safely assume they will work without monitoring from now on.<BR>Happy New Year! Best wishes for all to come in 2009! '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  02:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

527193 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-31 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.230721080E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 02:58, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
527194 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527193 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-31 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.230721320E09 +++$+++ Sorry CorenBot - this is a public domain source - and was and is clearly noted in the article since its initial creation.  Also, now noted on the talk page. &mdash;  +++$+++ :: Sorry CorenBot - this is a public domain source - and was and is clearly noted in the article since its initial creation.  Also, now noted on the talk page. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 03:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

527197 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527197 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-03 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.231051980E09 +++$+++ What a great Marine and patriot. Is he in the L\"ist of historically famous Marines\"?  +++$+++ What a great Marine and patriot. Is he in the L"ist of historically famous Marines"? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 22:53, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
527198 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527197 +++$+++ 527197 +++$+++ 2009-01-03 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.231052460E09 +++$+++ He is now (smile).  +++$+++ *He is now (smile). [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 23:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
527199 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527197 +++$+++ 527197 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.231069200E09 +++$+++ To your first question: within a couple weeks. You'll see a header on my user and talk page before I board the plane. To your second comment: I'm not very well versed in the FA process. I've attempted to participate in a couple before, and I got lost in the nuances; debate over the capitalization of a single letter, the placements of commas, and other weighty issues that I know little about. I could attempt to assist you, but my research resources aren't going to be any better than yours, nor do I have the depth or breadth of experience you have in biographies. If you have any specific tasks you think I could handle, let me know. ''' +++$+++ :To your first question: within a couple weeks. You'll see a header on my user and talk page before I board the plane. To your second comment: I'm not very well versed in the FA process. I've attempted to participate in a couple before, and I got lost in the nuances; debate over the capitalization of a single letter, the placements of commas, and other weighty issues that I know little about. I could attempt to assist you, but my research resources aren't going to be any better than yours, nor do I have the depth or breadth of experience you have in biographies. If you have any specific tasks you think I could handle, let me know. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  03:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

265055 +++$+++ Folks at 137 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265055 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-05 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.199576460E09 +++$+++ There's been some odd edits to the [[John F Kennedy Catholic School|JFK article]], 6th form humour - I ''think'' I've cleaned them out. As a fellow editor on Hemel topics, you might like to join me in keeping it in check - or preventing me being too \"prissy\". Ta.  +++$+++ There's been some odd edits to the [[John F Kennedy Catholic School|JFK article]], 6th form humour - I ''think'' I've cleaned them out. As a fellow editor on Hemel topics, you might like to join me in keeping it in check - or preventing me being too "prissy". Ta. [[User:Folks at 137|Folks at 137]] ([[User talk:Folks at 137|talk]]) 15:41, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
265056 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265055 +++$+++ 265055 +++$+++ 2008-01-05 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.199581620E09 +++$+++ I have checked and rolled back to the SmackBot version of 5 December 2007 which seems to be the last sensible one. I'd say all your changes were fine.  +++$+++ :I have checked and rolled back to the SmackBot version of 5 December 2007 which seems to be the last sensible one. I'd say all your changes were fine. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 17:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

527200 +++$+++ Ndunruh +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527200 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-04 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.231108980E09 +++$+++ Copy all, thanks much.  And thanks for taking on the portal when it was clear no one else was doing it.  Please accept a Military Barnstar for your work on both the USAF and Marine Corps portals.  +++$+++ Copy all, thanks much.  And thanks for taking on the portal when it was clear no one else was doing it.  Please accept a Military Barnstar for your work on both the USAF and Marine Corps portals. [[User:Ndunruh|Ndunruh]] ([[User talk:Ndunruh|talk]]) 14:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
527201 +++$+++ Ndunruh +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527200 +++$+++ 527200 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.231112880E09 +++$+++ I should be albe to, at least in the near-term.  I anticipate my duties becoming a great deal more rigerious in about a year's time, so I'll have to re-assess then, but for now I should be able to take it on.  +++$+++ : I should be albe to, at least in the near-term.  I anticipate my duties becoming a great deal more rigerious in about a year's time, so I'll have to re-assess then, but for now I should be able to take it on. [[User:Ndunruh|Ndunruh]] ([[User talk:Ndunruh|talk]]) 15:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

265058 +++$+++ SuzanneKn +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265058 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-24 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.201231860E09 +++$+++ I noticed you put the historical houses box on the [[Oatlands]] page. This page has given me a problem for a while as it covers both the village \/ district and palace. So I made a new page [[Oatlands Palace]] and put your historical houses box on that. What I can't seem to do is to change the box to link to [[Oatlands Palace]] rather than [[Oatlands]]. Perhaps you know how to do it. Thanks  +++$+++ I noticed you put the historical houses box on the [[Oatlands]] page. This page has given me a problem for a while as it covers both the village / district and palace. So I made a new page [[Oatlands Palace]] and put your historical houses box on that. What I can't seem to do is to change the box to link to [[Oatlands Palace]] rather than [[Oatlands]]. Perhaps you know how to do it. Thanks [[User:SuzanneKn|SuzanneKn]] ([[User talk:SuzanneKn|talk]]) 19:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
265059 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265058 +++$+++ 265058 +++$+++ 2008-01-25 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.201301400E09 +++$+++ I have done this and a little tidying of both articles. The Palaces template is at [[Template:Royal palaces in the United Kingdom\u200e]] .  +++$+++ :I have done this and a little tidying of both articles. The Palaces template is at [[Template:Royal palaces in the United Kingdom‎]] . [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 14:50, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

265060 +++$+++ Cesar Tort +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265060 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-31 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.201769220E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ —[[User:Cesar Tort|Cesar Tort]] 00:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
265061 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265060 +++$+++ 265060 +++$+++ 2008-01-31 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.201801020E09 +++$+++ You seem to be doing a fine job of defending the articles. I will keep an eye on them and see it I can contribute. +++$+++ :You seem to be doing a fine job of defending the articles. I will keep an eye on them and see it I can contribute.[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 09:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

2917 +++$+++ Derild4921 +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2917 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-28 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.280355300E09 +++$+++ Would you be interested in getting the article up to GA class? I'm pretty sure its almost there, but as the primary contributor I thought it would be better to ask you first. [[User:Derild4921|<span style=\"color:green\">Derild<\/span>]][[User talk:Derild4921|<span style=\"color:red\">49<\/span>]][[Special:Contributions\/Derild4921|<span style=\"color:blue\">21<\/span>]] +++$+++ Would you be interested in getting the article up to GA class? I'm pretty sure its almost there, but as the primary contributor I thought it would be better to ask you first. [[User:Derild4921|<span style="color:green">Derild</span>]][[User talk:Derild4921|<span style="color:red">49</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Derild4921|<span style="color:blue">21</span>]][[User:Derild4921/Guestbook|<span style="color:orange">☼</span>]] 15:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
2918 +++$+++ Derild4921 +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2917 +++$+++ 2917 +++$+++ 2010-07-28 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.280381880E09 +++$+++ Great, so looking at it now I think that the themes section should be expanded and the reception section needs to use less quotes and needs to be paraphrased more. I tried to cut it down yesterday, but I can only use a few sites so I couldn't view what else the reviews said. Anything else you can think of? [[User:Derild4921|<span style=\"color:green\">Derild<\/span>]][[User talk:Derild4921|<span style=\"color:red\">49<\/span>]][[Special:Contributions\/Derild4921|<span style=\"color:blue\">21<\/span>]] +++$+++ :Great, so looking at it now I think that the themes section should be expanded and the reception section needs to use less quotes and needs to be paraphrased more. I tried to cut it down yesterday, but I can only use a few sites so I couldn't view what else the reviews said. Anything else you can think of? [[User:Derild4921|<span style="color:green">Derild</span>]][[User talk:Derild4921|<span style="color:red">49</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Derild4921|<span style="color:blue">21</span>]][[User:Derild4921/Guestbook|<span style="color:orange">☼</span>]] 22:38, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

527208 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527208 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-14 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.231938660E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 05:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
527209 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527208 +++$+++ 527208 +++$+++ 2009-01-15 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.232009580E09 +++$+++ Good for deletion.  Replaced by [[:File:N-YHS logo.svg]].  &mdash;  +++$+++ : Good for deletion.  Replaced by [[:File:N-YHS logo.svg]].  &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 00:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

2921 +++$+++ Guy546 +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-02 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.286082120E09 +++$+++ The article [[The Twilight Saga (film series)]] you worked on to be a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been approved! [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] The article has been chosen to meet the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]]. Congratulations!  +++$+++ The article [[The Twilight Saga (film series)]] you worked on to be a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been approved! [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] The article has been chosen to meet the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]]. Congratulations! [[User:Guy546|<span style="black">Guy546</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Guy546|<span style="color:red">'''Talk'''</span>]])</sup> 22:02, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
2922 +++$+++ Guy546 +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2921 +++$+++ 2921 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.286097660E09 +++$+++ Thanks :).  +++$+++ :Thanks :). [[User:Guy546|<span style="black">Guy546</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Guy546|<span style="color:red">'''Talk'''</span>]])</sup> 02:21, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

2924 +++$+++ James26 +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310778840E09 +++$+++ I recently made some [[Blair Waldorf#Novel series|changes]] to the Blair Waldorf article. Not certain if I should push for Good Article status. I'm not asking you to read the whole thing, but from a quick glance, does anything stand out as absent\/lacking to you? I've mainly focused on the \"Novel\" section, since I think \"TV\" is pretty complete. --  +++$+++ I recently made some [[Blair Waldorf#Novel series|changes]] to the Blair Waldorf article. Not certain if I should push for Good Article status. I'm not asking you to read the whole thing, but from a quick glance, does anything stand out as absent/lacking to you? I've mainly focused on the "Novel" section, since I think "TV" is pretty complete. -- [[User:James26|James26]] ([[User talk:James26|talk]]) 18:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
2925 +++$+++ James26 +++$+++ Sergay +++$+++ 2924 +++$+++ 2924 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.310810940E09 +++$+++ Thanks. :) --  +++$+++ :Thanks. :) -- [[User:James26|James26]] ([[User talk:James26|talk]]) 03:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

481085 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481085 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-15 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.152953580E09 +++$+++ As you might know, I plan on doing Typhoon Pongsona as my next redo article. You mentioned that I should use JMA. Do you think that, instead, I could source [http:\/\/australiasevereweather.com\/cyclones\/2003\/summ0212.txt Gary Padgett's December Tropical Summary] for the storm history, which includes JTWC and JMA data? Simply using the JMA best track would be a little annoying, but by referencing that site, it would offer both centers. Then, the centers' respective best tracks could be linked in the other links section. Does that sound alright? Hypothetically if Pongsona was FAC'd, would that be a big issue? Thanks in advance. -- +++$+++ As you might know, I plan on doing Typhoon Pongsona as my next redo article. You mentioned that I should use JMA. Do you think that, instead, I could source [http://australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/2003/summ0212.txt Gary Padgett's December Tropical Summary] for the storm history, which includes JTWC and JMA data? Simply using the JMA best track would be a little annoying, but by referencing that site, it would offer both centers. Then, the centers' respective best tracks could be linked in the other links section. Does that sound alright? Hypothetically if Pongsona was FAC'd, would that be a big issue? Thanks in advance. --[[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 01:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
481086 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481085 +++$+++ 481085 +++$+++ 2006-07-15 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.153000260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the input, and I completely forgot the possibility of Padgett using operational data. A major problem I can forsee will be the usage of maximum sustained winds. Should it be in 1 min. sustained or 10 min. sustained? JMA uses 10, which means it should be used. However, writing 105 mph (10 min. sustained, 145 mph 1 min. sustained, 190 km\/h 10 min. sustained, 250 km\/h 1 min. sustained) for example would be a big pain. I suppose it could be \"Pongsona reached peak winds of 105 mph (10 min. sustained, 190 km\/h 10 min. sustained), or 145 mph 1 min. sustained (250 km\/h 1 min. sustained)\". I think I'll explain the differences in the beginning, but every wind measurement will be long and tedious. A JMA track map would be nice (to get the official feel), but it only indicates a peak of 105 mph, as opposed to 145 mph from JTWC. I don't know. I hate when things are this complicated ;) -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the input, and I completely forgot the possibility of Padgett using operational data. A major problem I can forsee will be the usage of maximum sustained winds. Should it be in 1 min. sustained or 10 min. sustained? JMA uses 10, which means it should be used. However, writing 105 mph (10 min. sustained, 145 mph 1 min. sustained, 190 km/h 10 min. sustained, 250 km/h 1 min. sustained) for example would be a big pain. I suppose it could be "Pongsona reached peak winds of 105 mph (10 min. sustained, 190 km/h 10 min. sustained), or 145 mph 1 min. sustained (250 km/h 1 min. sustained)". I think I'll explain the differences in the beginning, but every wind measurement will be long and tedious. A JMA track map would be nice (to get the official feel), but it only indicates a peak of 105 mph, as opposed to 145 mph from JTWC. I don't know. I hate when things are this complicated ;) --[[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 14:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
481087 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481085 +++$+++ 481086 +++$+++ 2006-07-15 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.153002540E09 +++$+++ OK, I suppose using 10 min. throughout works. What about km\/h? Should that be in 10 min. as well? Glad you found the conversion factor, and given that 10 min. will be used throughout, the track map should be too. -- +++$+++ ::OK, I suppose using 10 min. throughout works. What about km/h? Should that be in 10 min. as well? Glad you found the conversion factor, and given that 10 min. will be used throughout, the track map should be too. --[[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 15:29, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

265072 +++$+++ Cesar Tort +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-06 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.204873800E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ —[[User:Cesar Tort|Cesar Tort]] 23:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
265073 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265072 +++$+++ 265072 +++$+++ 2008-03-07 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.204912440E09 +++$+++ Cesar, Sorry I dont know any admins personally. I agree there is POV pushing going on . I will keep a closer watch on the article. Suggest the article goes on the [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]] RFC page to bring in more comments. Best wishes  +++$+++ :Cesar, Sorry I dont know any admins personally. I agree there is POV pushing going on . I will keep a closer watch on the article. Suggest the article goes on the [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]] RFC page to bring in more comments. Best wishes [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 09:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
265074 +++$+++ Cesar Tort +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265072 +++$+++ 265073 +++$+++ 2008-03-07 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.204938180E09 +++$+++ The trouble here is that that article has already been in RFC just before the present crisis. I'd rather wait and see if this user finally wants to argue in talk page. Otherwise I'll ask for a [[WP:3O]]. \u2014 +++$+++ ::The trouble here is that that article has already been in RFC just before the present crisis. I'd rather wait and see if this user finally wants to argue in talk page. Otherwise I'll ask for a [[WP:3O]]. —[[User:Cesar Tort|Cesar Tort]] 17:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

2929 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ RFBailey +++$+++ 2929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-10 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.289398200E09 +++$+++ Re Oxshott railway station, I reverted to the original date format for consistency. The ISO date format no longer autoconverts according to preferences and looks ugly in my opinion. Not sure about changing the accessdate. Going by what you say, everytime someone checks the ref, then they'll need to alter the accessdate in the ref. Webpage has not substanially changed since 5 Nov.  +++$+++ Re Oxshott railway station, I reverted to the original date format for consistency. The ISO date format no longer autoconverts according to preferences and looks ugly in my opinion. Not sure about changing the accessdate. Going by what you say, everytime someone checks the ref, then they'll need to alter the accessdate in the ref. Webpage has not substanially changed since 5 Nov. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 06:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
2930 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ RFBailey +++$+++ 2929 +++$+++ 2929 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.289427600E09 +++$+++ Accessdate changed.  +++$+++ :Accessdate changed. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 14:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
2931 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ RFBailey +++$+++ 2929 +++$+++ 2929 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.296021900E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing![[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  22:05, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

527219 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-02 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.233572280E09 +++$+++ I'll check it out right after the Super Bowl.  +++$+++ I'll check it out right after the Super Bowl. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 02:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
527220 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527219 +++$+++ 527219 +++$+++ 2009-02-02 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.233574200E09 +++$+++ You did an excellent job. My team lost! oh well, there is alawys next year.  +++$+++ *You did an excellent job. My team lost! oh well, there is alawys next year. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 03:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
527221 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527219 +++$+++ 527219 +++$+++ 2009-02-02 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.233576480E09 +++$+++ Bahamut0013's chevrons are in the picture? Amazing! You know something? I don't know Bahamut0013 personaly, but he is one hell of a great guy. There are some people here that you feel honored to have befriended and he is one of them. I always pray for his safety.  +++$+++ :Bahamut0013's chevrons are in the picture? Amazing! You know something? I don't know Bahamut0013 personaly, but he is one hell of a great guy. There are some people here that you feel honored to have befriended and he is one of them. I always pray for his safety. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 04:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

265078 +++$+++ Eebahgum +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265078 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-29 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.206774600E09 +++$+++ Hi there, Lumos3! I tried to make the thing about the new recording say 'almost three decades' in that paragraph about the Edison Co. Handel chorus recording, but someone with just a red IP reverted me. I am allergic to revert wars so I left it but put the ext link to the 1888 page into the text. As you are doing things with this page maybe you'd like to make it say 'three' decades. Possibly the person won't revert BOTH of us!  Did you know this story made [[Charlotte Green]], the BBC Radio 4 newsreader, get an attack of the giggles this morning live on air? Something to do with someone whispering it sounded like a bee in a bottle. I think it sounds fabulous, and I hope they go on and find Lincoln - and others. I think it's a big shame the [[Phonograph]] article is so Edison-centred it hasn't got room for some stuff on the Preece, Henry Edmunds and Augustus Stroh work of 1878. I guess the propaganda unit won't let this one go!!!! Best wishes. +++$+++ Hi there, Lumos3! I tried to make the thing about the new recording say 'almost three decades' in that paragraph about the Edison Co. Handel chorus recording, but someone with just a red IP reverted me. I am allergic to revert wars so I left it but put the ext link to the 1888 page into the text. As you are doing things with this page maybe you'd like to make it say 'three' decades. Possibly the person won't revert BOTH of us!  Did you know this story made [[Charlotte Green]], the BBC Radio 4 newsreader, get an attack of the giggles this morning live on air? Something to do with someone whispering it sounded like a bee in a bottle. I think it sounds fabulous, and I hope they go on and find Lincoln - and others. I think it's a big shame the [[Phonograph]] article is so Edison-centred it hasn't got room for some stuff on the Preece, Henry Edmunds and Augustus Stroh work of 1878. I guess the propaganda unit won't let this one go!!!! Best wishes.[[User:Eebahgum|Eebahgum]] ([[User talk:Eebahgum|talk]]) 00:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
265079 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265078 +++$+++ 265078 +++$+++ 2008-03-29 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.206775620E09 +++$+++ I believe most of your edit remains in place. 'almost three decades' could be seen as putting a spin on it , just say what it was ie 28 years. I have been playing the Au Clair de la Lune recording in a loop and thinks its very realistic and a bit spooky.  +++$+++ :I believe most of your edit remains in place. 'almost three decades' could be seen as putting a spin on it , just say what it was ie 28 years. I have been playing the Au Clair de la Lune recording in a loop and thinks its very realistic and a bit spooky. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 00:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

2935 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-23 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.298518800E09 +++$+++ See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Pgallert#DYK_idea this].  Pgallert had previously kindly offered to nominate good DYK candidates for me.  --  +++$+++ See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pgallert#DYK_idea this].  Pgallert had previously kindly offered to nominate good DYK candidates for me.  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 19:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
2936 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2935 +++$+++ 2935 +++$+++ 2011-02-23 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.298525460E09 +++$+++ That's a pleasing surprise. Many thanks, Ss!  +++$+++ :That's a pleasing surprise. Many thanks, Ss! [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 21:31, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
2937 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2935 +++$+++ 2936 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.298592900E09 +++$+++ He's done it.  See the nominations at {{T:TDYK|Richard Watson (singer)}} and {{T:TDYK|James Walker (conductor)}}.   --  +++$+++ ::He's done it.  See the nominations at {{T:TDYK|Richard Watson (singer)}} and {{T:TDYK|James Walker (conductor)}}.   -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 16:15, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
2938 +++$+++ Yngvadottir +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2935 +++$+++ 2937 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.298602020E09 +++$+++ Letting you know that I just reviewed [[Richard Watson (singer)]] for DYK and there's a problem with the referencing of the hook fact. -- +++$+++ :::Letting you know that I just reviewed [[Richard Watson (singer)]] for DYK and there's a problem with the referencing of the hook fact. --[[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]] ([[User talk:Yngvadottir|talk]]) 18:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
2939 +++$+++ Pgallert +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2935 +++$+++ 2938 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.298610900E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, I took the freedom to create new hooks, assuming that a reference in a paragraph generally covers the entire text before it. Hope I am not mistaken that this is how you write. I do not share [[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]]'s concern and have indicated that at DYK, but maybe you are in a position to add the requested url. The other concerns really do belong in a Good Article Review rather than in a DYK assessment. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::Hi Tim, I took the freedom to create new hooks, assuming that a reference in a paragraph generally covers the entire text before it. Hope I am not mistaken that this is how you write. I do not share [[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]]'s concern and have indicated that at DYK, but maybe you are in a position to add the requested url. The other concerns really do belong in a Good Article Review rather than in a DYK assessment. Cheers, [[User:Pgallert|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert|talk]]) 21:15, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

265081 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-06 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.207518120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 14:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
265082 +++$+++ Medos2 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265081 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-06 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.207538280E09 +++$+++ Paulings book is a best seller but it is over 20 years old. I think that needs to be kept in focus.  +++$+++ :::Paulings book is a best seller but it is over 20 years old. I think that needs to be kept in focus. [[User:Medos2|'''<font color="#228B22">M<font color="#228B22">e<font color="#228B22">d</font>o</font>s</font>''']] <sup> ([[User talk:Medos2|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Medos2|contribs]])</sup> 20:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

265083 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265083 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-06 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.207546800E09 +++$+++ I agree there is evidence that ascorbic acid increases oxalate formation but there is no evidence that it increases kidney stone formation. Correspondence does not equal causality. AA may have other effects in the body which may prevent stone formation. The Food and Nutrition Board panel on dietary antioxidants and related compounds suggested in 2000 that in vivo data do not clearly show a relationship between excess vitamin C intake and kidney stone formation [http:\/\/www.nutritionj.com\/content\/pdf\/1475-2891-2-7.pdf See here page3 and ref 20]. The article already notes this in the \"Adverse effects\" section. I have never seen a reputable study on the copper claim. The diarrhoea effect is well documented in the article , is reversible and harmless. Pauling's book was a popularisation of his ideas on AA from the early 1970s. His hypotheses have never been put to the test at his dose levels since then and there has been no study which has falsified them, so their age is not relevant. Mention of the book and Paulings deliberate role in promoting high doses is essential to a balanced historical view.  +++$+++ I agree there is evidence that ascorbic acid increases oxalate formation but there is no evidence that it increases kidney stone formation. Correspondence does not equal causality. AA may have other effects in the body which may prevent stone formation. The Food and Nutrition Board panel on dietary antioxidants and related compounds suggested in 2000 that in vivo data do not clearly show a relationship between excess vitamin C intake and kidney stone formation [http://www.nutritionj.com/content/pdf/1475-2891-2-7.pdf See here page3 and ref 20]. The article already notes this in the "Adverse effects" section. I have never seen a reputable study on the copper claim. The diarrhoea effect is well documented in the article , is reversible and harmless. Pauling's book was a popularisation of his ideas on AA from the early 1970s. His hypotheses have never been put to the test at his dose levels since then and there has been no study which has falsified them, so their age is not relevant. Mention of the book and Paulings deliberate role in promoting high doses is essential to a balanced historical view. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 22:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
265084 +++$+++ Medos2 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265083 +++$+++ 265083 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 09:39:00 +++$+++ 1.207586340E09 +++$+++ The flip-side of your point if there is no study on Paulings' work then equally there is no study which validates them, but I understand that you are showing that it is not mainstream so I do understand. I think you've defended your point admirably. Thanks for addressing my concerns.  +++$+++ :The flip-side of your point if there is no study on Paulings' work then equally there is no study which validates them, but I understand that you are showing that it is not mainstream so I do understand. I think you've defended your point admirably. Thanks for addressing my concerns. [[User:Medos2|'''<font color="#228B22">M<font color="#228B22">e<font color="#228B22">d</font>o</font>s</font>''']] <sup> ([[User talk:Medos2|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Medos2|contribs]])</sup> 09:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
265085 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265083 +++$+++ 265083 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.207674540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments. Perhaps one day we will see this headline:-  [http:\/\/www.knowledgeofhealth.com\/blog\/2008\/02\/vitamin-c-prescription-drug.html Research Study Launched To Make Vitamin C A Drug] (Its a spoof).  +++$+++ :Thanks for your comments. Perhaps one day we will see this headline:-  [http://www.knowledgeofhealth.com/blog/2008/02/vitamin-c-prescription-drug.html Research Study Launched To Make Vitamin C A Drug] (Its a spoof). [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 10:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

487081 +++$+++ Todfox +++$+++ Saxifrage +++$+++ 487081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-08 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.131470100E09 +++$+++ The irony is that if he keeps up this sort of behavior he probably will have a \"cabal\" of people who oppose him.  +++$+++ The irony is that if he keeps up this sort of behavior he probably will have a "cabal" of people who oppose him. [[User:Todfox|Kit]] 09:15, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
487082 +++$+++ Todfox +++$+++ Saxifrage +++$+++ 487081 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-11-08 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.131470280E09 +++$+++ p.s. I find it especially amusing that he has not only accused me of libelling him, but libelling his user page as well. I didn't know it was possible to libel inanimate objects!  +++$+++ ::p.s. I find it especially amusing that he has not only accused me of libelling him, but libelling his user page as well. I didn't know it was possible to libel inanimate objects! [[User:Todfox|Kit]] 09:18, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

265087 +++$+++ 81.134.14.178 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-11 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.207951140E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/81.134.14.178|81.134.14.178]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/81.134.14.178|81.134.14.178]] ([[User talk:81.134.14.178|talk]]) 14:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
265088 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265087 +++$+++ 265087 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.207964940E09 +++$+++ Apologies , I bow to your greater knowkedge. I was trying to convey that the Regenerator is an essential feature of a Stirling engine, although I now read that some engines may lack it and still be called SEs so Im now bemused.  +++$+++ :Apologies , I bow to your greater knowkedge. I was trying to convey that the Regenerator is an essential feature of a Stirling engine, although I now read that some engines may lack it and still be called SEs so Im now bemused. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 18:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

2944 +++$+++ Ronz +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2944 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-03 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.299202320E09 +++$+++ Can we mark the discussion you started at [[Talk:Musical_theatre#Response_to_my_offer]] as {{tl|resolved}}? Is further review or action needed? -- +++$+++ Can we mark the discussion you started at [[Talk:Musical_theatre#Response_to_my_offer]] as {{tl|resolved}}? Is further review or action needed? --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 17:32, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
2945 +++$+++ Ronz +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2944 +++$+++ 2944 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.299285120E09 +++$+++ Since you've responded elsewhere on the article talk page, I'm going to be bold and mark it resolved. -- +++$+++ :Since you've responded elsewhere on the article talk page, I'm going to be bold and mark it resolved. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 16:32, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
2946 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2944 +++$+++ 2945 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.299288840E09 +++$+++ If that constitutes an apology, I accept it.  +++$+++ ::If that constitutes an apology, I accept it. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 17:34, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
2947 +++$+++ Ronz +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2944 +++$+++ 2946 +++$+++ 2011-03-05 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.299333060E09 +++$+++ You got caught in the crossfire when I was defending myself from abuse. I should have been more careful to make sure that it was clear that I didn't find you at fault. -- +++$+++ :::You got caught in the crossfire when I was defending myself from abuse. I should have been more careful to make sure that it was clear that I didn't find you at fault. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 05:51, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

527234 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-07 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.236431160E09 +++$+++ I used the ref: [http:\/\/www.tecom.usmc.mil\/HD\/Whos_Who\/Megee_VE.htm Who's Who in Marine Corps History]... I thought that the text did conflict with the image as well. I hadn't created [[User:bahamut0013\/ribbon workshop\/incomplete]] at the time, but he's listed there now. If we can find any more references, then we can try to sort out which ones make more sense... but I think the Good Cookie makes sense, he was enlisted for almost five years before geting a commission. As far as the order goes, I've noticed that a loto of older photos are out of order... I think the precedence rules for non-US awards have changed since WWII. I sort them by personal awards, unit awards, and then service & campaign awards last. This is the current rule, and unless I know of a specific change in the rules (such as the [[Navy Distinguished Service Medal]] being superior to the [[Navy Cross]] many years ago) that makes sense for the time period the individual served, I default to the modern regulations. ''' +++$+++ I used the ref: [http://www.tecom.usmc.mil/HD/Whos_Who/Megee_VE.htm Who's Who in Marine Corps History]... I thought that the text did conflict with the image as well. I hadn't created [[User:bahamut0013/ribbon workshop/incomplete]] at the time, but he's listed there now. If we can find any more references, then we can try to sort out which ones make more sense... but I think the Good Cookie makes sense, he was enlisted for almost five years before geting a commission. As far as the order goes, I've noticed that a loto of older photos are out of order... I think the precedence rules for non-US awards have changed since WWII. I sort them by personal awards, unit awards, and then service & campaign awards last. This is the current rule, and unless I know of a specific change in the rules (such as the [[Navy Distinguished Service Medal]] being superior to the [[Navy Cross]] many years ago) that makes sense for the time period the individual served, I default to the modern regulations. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  05:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
527235 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527234 +++$+++ 527234 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.236434640E09 +++$+++ The photos aren't always up to date, however... that's why I use them as a guide only, and I usually trust the prose over the photo if it makes more logical sense. If you look at the incomplete page, you'll see a few instances when what appears to be on thier chest doesn't make a lick of sense, but the prose does. It doesn't help that often these photos are monochromatic, small resolution, or both; it's easly to confuse one ribbon for another, especially when we start adding foreign awards to the mix! ''' +++$+++ :The photos aren't always up to date, however... that's why I use them as a guide only, and I usually trust the prose over the photo if it makes more logical sense. If you look at the incomplete page, you'll see a few instances when what appears to be on thier chest doesn't make a lick of sense, but the prose does. It doesn't help that often these photos are monochromatic, small resolution, or both; it's easly to confuse one ribbon for another, especially when we start adding foreign awards to the mix! '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  06:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
527236 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527234 +++$+++ 527235 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.236552480E09 +++$+++ See talk page response.  Guidance has been provided in each message. &mdash;  +++$+++ :: See talk page response.  Guidance has been provided in each message. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 15:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
527237 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527234 +++$+++ 527235 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.236552480E09 +++$+++ See alexa.com &mdash; though 1800 hits seems high, it is low in terms of notability for a website. &mdash;  +++$+++ :: See alexa.com &mdash; though 1800 hits seems high, it is low in terms of notability for a website. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 15:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

265091 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-11 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.207977180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3|talk]]) 22:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
265092 +++$+++ Pv=mrt +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265091 +++$+++ 265091 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.208187960E09 +++$+++ Yours dissapointed  +++$+++ : Yours dissapointed [[User:Pv=mrt|Pv=mrt]] ([[User talk:Pv=mrt|talk]]) 08:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

2948 +++$+++ Skier Dude2 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2948 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-07 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.299509100E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of \"file\" pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Skier Dude2|Skier Dude2]] ([[User talk:Skier Dude2|talk]]) 06:45, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
2949 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2948 +++$+++ 2948 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.299513540E09 +++$+++ {{done}} - and only sysops\/admins can delete pages\/images.  +++$+++ :{{done}} - and only sysops/admins can delete pages/images. [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 07:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

527238 +++$+++ PMDrive1061 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-10 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.236670440E09 +++$+++ Feel free to go ahead and revert the deletion; thank you ''very'' much for asking.  I deleted it aas a possible copyvio which didn't assert the notability.  -- +++$+++ Feel free to go ahead and revert the deletion; thank you ''very'' much for asking.  I deleted it aas a possible copyvio which didn't assert the notability.  --[[User:PMDrive1061|PMDrive1061]] ([[User talk:PMDrive1061|talk]]) 00:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
527239 +++$+++ PMDrive1061 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527238 +++$+++ 527238 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.236671400E09 +++$+++ No prob.  Someone else tagged it for notability, but it looked like a copyvio to me.  No Google hits, so it's OK.  I'll go ahead and restore it for ya.  -- +++$+++ *No prob.  Someone else tagged it for notability, but it looked like a copyvio to me.  No Google hits, so it's OK.  I'll go ahead and restore it for ya.  --[[User:PMDrive1061|PMDrive1061]] ([[User talk:PMDrive1061|talk]]) 00:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

2951 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2951 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.300354440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for asking - I will be glad to do it, but have four other requests ahead in the line (queue), so it will take me some time.  +++$+++ Thanks for asking - I will be glad to do it, but have four other requests ahead in the line (queue), so it will take me some time. [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 02:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
2952 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2951 +++$+++ 2951 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.302172320E09 +++$+++ WIll take a look at the FAC, but it will take me a day or two.  +++$+++ :WIll take a look at the FAC, but it will take me a day or two. [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 03:32, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

527240 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-11 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.236790260E09 +++$+++ Need some admin help regarding a troublesome anon IP user who keeps re-adding an external link for a non-notable parody to [[8-Bit Theater]]. See discussion at [[Talk:8-Bit Theater#Flash movies]]. I origionally assumed this was a simple good-faith error, but the anon has repeatedly ignored attempts to communicate, even undoing one of [[User:XLinkBot]]'s ''many'' warnings. We would appreciate your thoughts on doing a short block to spur the user into communicating with us. ''' +++$+++ Need some admin help regarding a troublesome anon IP user who keeps re-adding an external link for a non-notable parody to [[8-Bit Theater]]. See discussion at [[Talk:8-Bit Theater#Flash movies]]. I origionally assumed this was a simple good-faith error, but the anon has repeatedly ignored attempts to communicate, even undoing one of [[User:XLinkBot]]'s ''many'' warnings. We would appreciate your thoughts on doing a short block to spur the user into communicating with us. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  09:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
527241 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527240 +++$+++ 527240 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.236859380E09 +++$+++ Thank you sir, hopefully this will get him or her to talk to us about this issue. ''' +++$+++ :Thank you sir, hopefully this will get him or her to talk to us about this issue. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  05:03, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

527243 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527243 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-13 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.236974460E09 +++$+++ Good stuff on the DYK for Richard Mangrum.  He was a big time part of USMC Aviation history and one of the four iron horses of Guadalcanal.  I came across this article, [[Charles Tatum]],  while looking at info for the upcoming miniseries [[The Pacific (miniseries)|The Pacific]].  I was hoping you might be able to do some of that voodoo you do.  Hope all is well. -- +++$+++ Good stuff on the DYK for Richard Mangrum.  He was a big time part of USMC Aviation history and one of the four iron horses of Guadalcanal.  I came across this article, [[Charles Tatum]],  while looking at info for the upcoming miniseries [[The Pacific (miniseries)|The Pacific]].  I was hoping you might be able to do some of that voodoo you do.  Hope all is well. --[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] ([[User talk:Looper5920|talk]]) 13:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
527244 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527243 +++$+++ 527243 +++$+++ 2009-03-13 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.236976500E09 +++$+++ After a second look I am not even sure if this guys notability rates a bio.  What do you think?-- +++$+++ :After a second look I am not even sure if this guys notability rates a bio.  What do you think?--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] ([[User talk:Looper5920|talk]]) 13:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

527245 +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-13 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.236994920E09 +++$+++ Hi, i was reviewing some edits and i noticed you referenced truthout.org as t r u t h o u t, which is unusual to say the least.  What is the thinking behind this special formatting?  Thanks in advance.   +++$+++ Hi, i was reviewing some edits and i noticed you referenced truthout.org as t r u t h o u t, which is unusual to say the least.  What is the thinking behind this special formatting?  Thanks in advance.  [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah|talk]]) 18:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
527246 +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527245 +++$+++ 527245 +++$+++ 2009-03-13 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.236995520E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rahm_Emanuel&diff=252711716&oldid=252679604 here's] the diff on that edit.  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rahm_Emanuel&diff=252711716&oldid=252679604 here's] the diff on that edit. [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah|talk]]) 18:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
527247 +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527245 +++$+++ 527246 +++$+++ 2009-04-15 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.239844500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your clarification on that, makes total sense to me.   +++$+++ ::Thanks for your clarification on that, makes total sense to me.  [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah|talk]]) 18:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

265102 +++$+++ Pv=mrt +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-25 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.211768340E09 +++$+++ Yes,the Stirling engine does offer possibilities for utilising waste heat from other processes, but my intention in this instance was to highlight the ease with which heat from the 'cold end' of a SE can be recovered for, say, domestic water heating. In contrast to an internal combustion engine where the waste heat is split between the cooling system and exhaust gasses - recovery from the latter beng particularly challenging. This is one of the characteristics that makes the SE uniquely suited to domestic CHP. Perhaps my wording could have been better and I invite you to improve upon it whilst retaining the original meaning.  +++$+++ Yes,the Stirling engine does offer possibilities for utilising waste heat from other processes, but my intention in this instance was to highlight the ease with which heat from the 'cold end' of a SE can be recovered for, say, domestic water heating. In contrast to an internal combustion engine where the waste heat is split between the cooling system and exhaust gasses - recovery from the latter beng particularly challenging. This is one of the characteristics that makes the SE uniquely suited to domestic CHP. Perhaps my wording could have been better and I invite you to improve upon it whilst retaining the original meaning. [[User:Pv=mrt|Pv=mrt]] ([[User talk:Pv=mrt|talk]]) 19:19, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
265103 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265102 +++$+++ 265102 +++$+++ 2008-05-25 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.211775300E09 +++$+++ Utilisation of waste heat - I am not convinced this is real beyond marketeering. The citation does not support it. Waste heat can be utilised from any heat engine and there is nothing about a Stirling engine that seems special in this. Exhaust gases from a stirling  engine combustion chamber would be as difficult to use as exhaust gases from an Internal combustion engine. Please find a citation.  +++$+++ :Utilisation of waste heat - I am not convinced this is real beyond marketeering. The citation does not support it. Waste heat can be utilised from any heat engine and there is nothing about a Stirling engine that seems special in this. Exhaust gases from a stirling  engine combustion chamber would be as difficult to use as exhaust gases from an Internal combustion engine. Please find a citation. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 21:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

2959 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-02 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.301772780E09 +++$+++ {{Tb|Fowler&fowler|Mandell Creighton}}   +++$+++ {{Tb|Fowler&fowler|Mandell Creighton}}  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 12:33, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
2960 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2959 +++$+++ 2959 +++$+++ 2011-04-06 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.302121800E09 +++$+++ It was fun reading your peer-review comments.  I've adopted them all and replied at the peer review. Thanks for taking the time to make them.   +++$+++ :It was fun reading your peer-review comments.  I've adopted them all and replied at the peer review. Thanks for taking the time to make them.  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 13:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

265104 +++$+++ Pv=mrt +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-25 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.211777520E09 +++$+++ Point taken though and I shall seek a suitable ref.  +++$+++ Point taken though and I shall seek a suitable ref. [[User:Pv=mrt|Pv=mrt]] ([[User talk:Pv=mrt|talk]]) 21:52, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
265105 +++$+++ Pv=mrt +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265104 +++$+++ 265104 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.211836980E09 +++$+++ Well, I haven't got to the stage of trawling through back copies of 'Stirling News' yet, but so far no suitable ref has presented itself from my library (must have read it somewhere!. A quick google search produced this http:\/\/www.ingenia.org.uk\/ingenia\/articles.aspx?Index=108 which has a slightly oblique ref (see third para of \"operation of the Stirling engine\") - would that satisfy you?  +++$+++ :Well, I haven't got to the stage of trawling through back copies of 'Stirling News' yet, but so far no suitable ref has presented itself from my library (must have read it somewhere!. A quick google search produced this http://www.ingenia.org.uk/ingenia/articles.aspx?Index=108 which has a slightly oblique ref (see third para of "operation of the Stirling engine") - would that satisfy you? [[User:Pv=mrt|Pv=mrt]] ([[User talk:Pv=mrt|talk]]) 14:23, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
265106 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265104 +++$+++ 265105 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.211985540E09 +++$+++ This article does not make it clear if its talking about the heat from the cold side of the engine or the waste heat from the combustion chamber. I suspect its the combustion chamber. Its clear the SE is versatile and can utislise heat in a ways that other engines cannot but the statment that its own waste heat can be particularly easily used is not supported in theory or practise. In a combined Heat and power scheme the engine is in effect running on the waste heat of the heating boiler and using it to make electricity. Its the boiler heat that is more efficiently used.  +++$+++ :: This article does not make it clear if its talking about the heat from the cold side of the engine or the waste heat from the combustion chamber. I suspect its the combustion chamber. Its clear the SE is versatile and can utislise heat in a ways that other engines cannot but the statment that its own waste heat can be particularly easily used is not supported in theory or practise. In a combined Heat and power scheme the engine is in effect running on the waste heat of the heating boiler and using it to make electricity. Its the boiler heat that is more efficiently used. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 07:39, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

2961 +++$+++ Farine +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2961 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-07 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.302240660E09 +++$+++ Who do you think you are to come out here and make these gratuious comments? I've been at Wikipedia for 6 years and probably longer than you. If I didn't know how to edit on Wikipedia, I would be gone a long time ago. So if it's for you to make these type of ill-conceived personal comments, I would suggest that to shut your trap because I don't want to hear about them. +++$+++ Who do you think you are to come out here and make these gratuious comments? I've been at Wikipedia for 6 years and probably longer than you. If I didn't know how to edit on Wikipedia, I would be gone a long time ago. So if it's for you to make these type of ill-conceived personal comments, I would suggest that to shut your trap because I don't want to hear about them.[[User:Farine|Farine]] ([[User talk:Farine|talk]]) 22:31, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
2962 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2961 +++$+++ 2961 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.302241320E09 +++$+++ How very kind!  +++$+++ :How very kind! [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 22:42, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
2963 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2961 +++$+++ 2962 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.302305520E09 +++$+++ Yeah, riley, you shut yer trap.  +++$+++ ::Yeah, riley, you shut yer trap. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 16:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

265107 +++$+++ Pv=mrt +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265107 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-28 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.211992620E09 +++$+++ My main intention in introducing the paragraph under discussion was to provide some sort of 'why should I be interested?' content to the introduction as suggested (by yourself?) in the discussion pages a while ago and on current evidence it appears that if the SE is to achieve any significant market penetration as a prime mover (something it has signally failed to do since the late 19th century), it is likely to be as the core component of domestic scale CHP systems  +++$+++ My main intention in introducing the paragraph under discussion was to provide some sort of 'why should I be interested?' content to the introduction as suggested (by yourself?) in the discussion pages a while ago and on current evidence it appears that if the SE is to achieve any significant market penetration as a prime mover (something it has signally failed to do since the late 19th century), it is likely to be as the core component of domestic scale CHP systems [[User:Pv=mrt|Pv=mrt]] ([[User talk:Pv=mrt|talk]]) 09:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
265108 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265107 +++$+++ 265107 +++$+++ 2008-05-29 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.212083580E09 +++$+++ I believe the current phrasing of the introduction accomplishes this as it informs the reader of the versatility of the SE and its application in CHP. I dont think your quote is clear and universally stated enough for the claim to be made in the introduction where its a little confusing unless the reader knows some background.  I have no problem if you want to add it in the section on CHP in the article.  +++$+++ : I believe the current phrasing of the introduction accomplishes this as it informs the reader of the versatility of the SE and its application in CHP. I dont think your quote is clear and universally stated enough for the claim to be made in the introduction where its a little confusing unless the reader knows some background.  I have no problem if you want to add it in the section on CHP in the article. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 10:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

393710 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tkgd2007 +++$+++ 393710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-21 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.248215880E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of \"file\" pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 15:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
393711 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tkgd2007 +++$+++ 393710 +++$+++ 393710 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.248215940E09 +++$+++ Ignore that, my mistake.  +++$+++ :Ignore that, my mistake. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 15:39, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

265110 +++$+++ Tagishsimon +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265110 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-04 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.212646320E09 +++$+++ As Wikia != wikipedia, I've removed the wikia story from press coverage. -- +++$+++ As Wikia != wikipedia, I've removed the wikia story from press coverage. --[[User:Tagishsimon|Tagishsimon]] [[User_talk:Tagishsimon|(talk)]] 23:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
265111 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265110 +++$+++ 265110 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.212646800E09 +++$+++ I know Wikia is not Wikipedia but this and every other press article will explain Wikia in terms of Wikipedia so there is a going to be a lot of indirect press coverage of Wikipedia from the launch. I think we need to include at least one high profile article for the record. This is also an interview with Wales not just a news report, plus its in Forbes not just a backwater. I think it should stay. +++$+++ : I know Wikia is not Wikipedia but this and every other press article will explain Wikia in terms of Wikipedia so there is a going to be a lot of indirect press coverage of Wikipedia from the launch. I think we need to include at least one high profile article for the record. This is also an interview with Wales not just a news report, plus its in Forbes not just a backwater. I think it should stay.[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 23:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
265112 +++$+++ Tagishsimon +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265110 +++$+++ 265111 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.212647640E09 +++$+++ Nope. It's an article about Wikia. An interview about Wikia. Any Wikipedia mention is incidental. It just does not qualify; we do not record Wikia ... let them create their own press page. They are not us. -- +++$+++ ::Nope. It's an article about Wikia. An interview about Wikia. Any Wikipedia mention is incidental. It just does not qualify; we do not record Wikia ... let them create their own press page. They are not us. --[[User:Tagishsimon|Tagishsimon]] [[User_talk:Tagishsimon|(talk)]] 23:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
265113 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265110 +++$+++ 265111 +++$+++ 2008-06-05 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.212676560E09 +++$+++ OK fair enough.  +++$+++ ::OK fair enough. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 07:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

2967 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2967 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-16 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.302978900E09 +++$+++ Just saw that [[Thomas Beecham]] made FA! Nicely done,  +++$+++ Just saw that [[Thomas Beecham]] made FA! Nicely done, [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 11:35, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
2968 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2967 +++$+++ 2967 +++$+++ 2011-04-16 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.302997140E09 +++$+++ Me too; Sir Tom in his rightful place ([[Nixon in China (opera)|Nixon in China]] went up too). For the future: I am currently working on [[Percy Grainger]] \u2013 though not much visible yet \u2013 and I'm then going to do [[Kathleen Ferrier]], for whom I have acquired much source material. That probably takes me to mid\/late June, which may be an appropriate date for starting the ''Messiah'' project. Are you still up for this, and does that sound like a feasible timescale? I can always adjust as necessary.  +++$+++ :Me too; Sir Tom in his rightful place ([[Nixon in China (opera)|Nixon in China]] went up too). For the future: I am currently working on [[Percy Grainger]] – though not much visible yet – and I'm then going to do [[Kathleen Ferrier]], for whom I have acquired much source material. That probably takes me to mid/late June, which may be an appropriate date for starting the ''Messiah'' project. Are you still up for this, and does that sound like a feasible timescale? I can always adjust as necessary. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 16:39, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
2969 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2967 +++$+++ 2968 +++$+++ 2011-04-16 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.303018260E09 +++$+++ Gentlemen, I'm much touched by this reception. I can only trust that by strict attention to duty I shall ensure a continuance of those favours which it will ever be my study to deserve. Happy to serve in the infantry on Messiah, though I'm no expert.  +++$+++ ::Gentlemen, I'm much touched by this reception. I can only trust that by strict attention to duty I shall ensure a continuance of those favours which it will ever be my study to deserve. Happy to serve in the infantry on Messiah, though I'm no expert. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 22:31, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

524783 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524783 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-26 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.198713780E09 +++$+++ # Good question! :-) [[Wikipedia:Image#Obtaining_images]] is for images that already exist. Very old images (death of author + 100 years), mostly photos of paintings, are probably public domain already, under [[Template:PD-art]]. For more recent people, [[User:AnonEMouse\/Images|I personally have had some good luck]] looking in the official sites of the US Library of Congress, US Presidential libraries, the official US Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine, Coast Guard sites for a few more (all pictures taken by a member of the US Federal Government in the performance of their duties are public domain), the Creative Commons (we can use Attribution and Share-Alike) search of [[Flickr]]. When that fails, ask. [[User:Videmus Omnia\/Requesting free content]] explains how to do that better than I could - the important part is you have to ask them to make the image available for everyone to use, not just us, the Wikipedia. Tell them that we're the #8 web site in the whole world, so ''a lot'' of people could be seeing their photo, which we will attribute (give credit) for them as they like, that helps a bit. Success rate for asking Flickr users who took a picture of someone at a convention or book signing or trade show is about 60%, for asking the people themselves or their publicist is maybe 20%, so steel yourself for a fair bit of rejection ... and make up for it by sending a lot of requests. :-) You might also hit it very lucky and find a hobbyist or even professional who has a lot of photos who is willing to freely license the lot of them, [[User:Tabercil\/Luke Ford permission|Tabercil did that]], and it has been a real boon to [[WP:P*]]. -- +++$+++ # Good question! :-) [[Wikipedia:Image#Obtaining_images]] is for images that already exist. Very old images (death of author + 100 years), mostly photos of paintings, are probably public domain already, under [[Template:PD-art]]. For more recent people, [[User:AnonEMouse/Images|I personally have had some good luck]] looking in the official sites of the US Library of Congress, US Presidential libraries, the official US Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine, Coast Guard sites for a few more (all pictures taken by a member of the US Federal Government in the performance of their duties are public domain), the Creative Commons (we can use Attribution and Share-Alike) search of [[Flickr]]. When that fails, ask. [[User:Videmus Omnia/Requesting free content]] explains how to do that better than I could - the important part is you have to ask them to make the image available for everyone to use, not just us, the Wikipedia. Tell them that we're the #8 web site in the whole world, so ''a lot'' of people could be seeing their photo, which we will attribute (give credit) for them as they like, that helps a bit. Success rate for asking Flickr users who took a picture of someone at a convention or book signing or trade show is about 60%, for asking the people themselves or their publicist is maybe 20%, so steel yourself for a fair bit of rejection ... and make up for it by sending a lot of requests. :-) You might also hit it very lucky and find a hobbyist or even professional who has a lot of photos who is willing to freely license the lot of them, [[User:Tabercil/Luke Ford permission|Tabercil did that]], and it has been a real boon to [[WP:P*]]. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
524784 +++$+++ Alatari +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524783 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.199794200E09 +++$+++ So uploading this [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/scottpasfield\/2092697947\/ Rosie Perez] image to Wikipedia for use in her article won't meet with objection?   +++$+++ ::So uploading this [http://www.flickr.com/photos/scottpasfield/2092697947/ Rosie Perez] image to Wikipedia for use in her article won't meet with objection?  [[User:Alatari|Alatari]] ([[User talk:Alatari|talk]]) 04:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
524785 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524783 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.199832120E09 +++$+++ You'll need to get permission from the image owner. The Flickr user, Scott Pasfield, seems to be a professional photographer, so he probably understands about image rights. If he says he is the image owner, you will need to get his permission. The easiest way for him to give it is to change the tags on the image in Flickr to Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) or Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC-BY-SA). A more complicated way is for him to email you the image, and the statement \"I own the rights to the attached image, and release it under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license\", and you to forward that email to permissions (at) wikimedia.org. If he does that, we can use the image. We can't use it without a permission like that. -- +++$+++ ::: You'll need to get permission from the image owner. The Flickr user, Scott Pasfield, seems to be a professional photographer, so he probably understands about image rights. If he says he is the image owner, you will need to get his permission. The easiest way for him to give it is to change the tags on the image in Flickr to Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) or Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC-BY-SA). A more complicated way is for him to email you the image, and the statement "I own the rights to the attached image, and release it under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license", and you to forward that email to permissions (at) wikimedia.org. If he does that, we can use the image. We can't use it without a permission like that. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
524786 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524783 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.199832660E09 +++$+++ You'll notice that one worked. :-) -- +++$+++ ::: You'll notice that one worked. :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

2972 +++$+++ Cassianto +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2972 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-24 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.303712340E09 +++$+++ Once again, Thank you so much for making this article everything I wanted it to be.  +++$+++ Once again, Thank you so much for making this article everything I wanted it to be. [[User:Cassianto|Cassianto]] ([[User talk:Cassianto|talk]]) 23:19, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
2973 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2972 +++$+++ 2972 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.303796220E09 +++$+++ [[The Pleasure of His Company]], a 1961 film, was based on a 1958 play by [[Samuel A. Taylor]] that premiered on Broadway and was directed by and starred [[Cyril Ritchard]], with [[Charlie Ruggles]], who won a Tony for his supporting role.  See [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=9yaED729ZaEC&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22The+Pleasure+of+His+Company%22&source=bl&ots=-qbxxvG4ML&sig=cGKJIoHqM818JezN6n_LZVqv5j8&hl=en&ei=CfG1TeWxNKT40gHk6cGECQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEsQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q&f=false this].  I was confused by this too.  I'm not convinced that there really a separate entertainment about Coward by this name....  I see an Australian source that says \"Douglas Fairbanks Jnr, [[David Langton]] and Stanley Holloway in ''The Pleasure Of His Company''\" [http:\/\/johnthaw.topcities.com\/articles7.html]. [http:\/\/www.biblioz.com\/lp25764499085.html] says [[Carol Raye]] was also in the cast.  Neither mention Coward, but they also don't mention Samuel A. Taylor.  --  +++$+++ :[[The Pleasure of His Company]], a 1961 film, was based on a 1958 play by [[Samuel A. Taylor]] that premiered on Broadway and was directed by and starred [[Cyril Ritchard]], with [[Charlie Ruggles]], who won a Tony for his supporting role.  See [http://books.google.com/books?id=9yaED729ZaEC&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22The+Pleasure+of+His+Company%22&source=bl&ots=-qbxxvG4ML&sig=cGKJIoHqM818JezN6n_LZVqv5j8&hl=en&ei=CfG1TeWxNKT40gHk6cGECQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEsQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q&f=false this].  I was confused by this too.  I'm not convinced that there really a separate entertainment about Coward by this name....  I see an Australian source that says "Douglas Fairbanks Jnr, [[David Langton]] and Stanley Holloway in ''The Pleasure Of His Company''" [http://johnthaw.topcities.com/articles7.html]. [http://www.biblioz.com/lp25764499085.html] says [[Carol Raye]] was also in the cast.  Neither mention Coward, but they also don't mention Samuel A. Taylor.  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 22:37, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

568474 +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568474 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-27 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.151467440E09 +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Certainty principle|deletion review]] of [[Certainty principle]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. -- +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Certainty principle|deletion review]] of [[Certainty principle]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. --[[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]] [[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''ʕ''']] 21:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
568475 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568474 +++$+++ 568474 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.151471100E09 +++$+++ '''Comment''' The article that I speedily deleted on June 7th consisted of two sentences: ''\"Do not fight with the Truth. Do not fight with the will of God.\"'' As you can see, the content had nothing to do with a mathematical proof and was merely a religion-based point-of-view comment. You can find this comment on [[User:Weriu|Weriu's Talk page]], as well as [[User_talk:Weriu|my report]] that the page had been deleted as a {{tl|db-repost}}.  I received no reply from any party before being informed of this deletion review by [[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]].  I believe that I acted from a policy position and my audit trail is clear to see. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ *'''Comment''' The article that I speedily deleted on June 7th consisted of two sentences: ''"Do not fight with the Truth. Do not fight with the will of God."'' As you can see, the content had nothing to do with a mathematical proof and was merely a religion-based point-of-view comment. You can find this comment on [[User:Weriu|Weriu's Talk page]], as well as [[User_talk:Weriu|my report]] that the page had been deleted as a {{tl|db-repost}}.  I received no reply from any party before being informed of this deletion review by [[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]].  I believe that I acted from a policy position and my audit trail is clear to see. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 22:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

2974 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-26 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.303856100E09 +++$+++ LOL:  This says that Noel Coward said that he wished he had written ''The Pleasure of His Company'': [http:\/\/articles.latimes.com\/1992-10-08\/news\/ga-692_1_sierra-madre-playhouse].  --  +++$+++ LOL:  This says that Noel Coward said that he wished he had written ''The Pleasure of His Company'': [http://articles.latimes.com/1992-10-08/news/ga-692_1_sierra-madre-playhouse].  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 15:15, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
2975 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2974 +++$+++ 2974 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.303854540E09 +++$+++ I changed the Coward info to instead refer to the play by [[Samuel A. Taylor]] and Skinner.  --  +++$+++ :I changed the Coward info to instead refer to the play by [[Samuel A. Taylor]] and Skinner.  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 14:49, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

527263 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-28 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.238247000E09 +++$+++ I thought you might be interested in this: [[Talk:Charles Heywood|Heywood was ''not'' a Medal of Honor recipient]]. Cheers! ''' +++$+++ I thought you might be interested in this: [[Talk:Charles Heywood|Heywood was ''not'' a Medal of Honor recipient]]. Cheers! '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  06:30, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
527264 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527263 +++$+++ 527263 +++$+++ 2009-03-28 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.238282640E09 +++$+++ You know, its amazing how much I've learned in two years by editing Wikipedia. I had absolutley zero biographical experience, and knew so very little about the awards and decorations of the United States (aside from my own meager ribbon rack). ''' +++$+++ :You know, its amazing how much I've learned in two years by editing Wikipedia. I had absolutley zero biographical experience, and knew so very little about the awards and decorations of the United States (aside from my own meager ribbon rack). '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  16:24, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
527265 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527263 +++$+++ 527264 +++$+++ 2009-03-31 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.238545080E09 +++$+++ Happy [[April Fools' Day]], ER! [[Special:Contributions\/Bahamut0013|<span style=\"background:#D2B48C;color:#000;\"><sub><small>sp\u01dd\u01ddp<\/small><\/sub><\/span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style=\"background:#D2B48C;color:#000;\"><sup><small>sp\u0279o\u028d<\/small><\/sup><\/span>]]''' +++$+++ ::Happy [[April Fools' Day]], ER! [[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>spǝǝp</small></sub></span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>spɹoʍ</small></sup></span>]]'''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">3100ʇnɯɐɥɐq</span>]]''' 17:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

265122 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-14 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.218755820E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I've been trying to find a form of words that might cover the same ground as that pseudoscience box and be acceptable to everybody involved. I think most of the editors on the page would agree that OM isn't as unreal as homeopathy or therapeutic touch, but is obviously seen as not mainstream science. Could you live with ''\"This lack of serious testing of orthomolecular medicine has led to its practices being classed with other less plausible forms of alternative medicine and regarded as unscientific.\"'' [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Orthomolecular_medicine&diff=231827858&oldid=231801238 diff]?  +++$+++ Hi there. I've been trying to find a form of words that might cover the same ground as that pseudoscience box and be acceptable to everybody involved. I think most of the editors on the page would agree that OM isn't as unreal as homeopathy or therapeutic touch, but is obviously seen as not mainstream science. Could you live with ''"This lack of serious testing of orthomolecular medicine has led to its practices being classed with other less plausible forms of alternative medicine and regarded as unscientific."'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Orthomolecular_medicine&diff=231827858&oldid=231801238 diff]? [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 16:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
265123 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265122 +++$+++ 265122 +++$+++ 2008-08-14 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.218757140E09 +++$+++ In support of this we need to cite who the people are who are commenting negatively on orthomolecular medicine itself , rather than just multi\/mega vitamin taking. ie the critic should mention OM directly.  +++$+++ :In support of this we need to cite who the people are who are commenting negatively on orthomolecular medicine itself , rather than just multi/mega vitamin taking. ie the critic should mention OM directly. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 16:39, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
265124 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265122 +++$+++ 265123 +++$+++ 2008-08-14 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.218757980E09 +++$+++ Could you repost this at [[Talk:Orthomolecular_medicine#Compromise]], so that others can comment? Should have given you the link before, sorry.  +++$+++ ::Could you repost this at [[Talk:Orthomolecular_medicine#Compromise]], so that others can comment? Should have given you the link before, sorry. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 16:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

2979 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-05 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.304616660E09 +++$+++ It's a bit early, but maybe we should agree a general strategy for approaching this expansion. What parts of the article would you like to work on? I am easy about this, but once I know what I'm going to do, I can begin to collect source materials. I'm bogged down with Grainger at the moment, but will perhaps have something reviewable in about a week. Then I want to do [[Kathleen Ferrier]]; I need to do a \"nice\" person, after my recent preoccupations with Delius (syphilis), Tom Driberg (sexual predator) Nixon (all-round bad egg) and Grainger (flagellant racist with syphilitic father). Of course I'll probably find that Kathleen was a crack cocaine addict who practised baby-farming. We shall see. Anyway, hopefully ''Messiah'' can begin in earnest by mid-June. Let me know if you see any problems with that timescale.  +++$+++ It's a bit early, but maybe we should agree a general strategy for approaching this expansion. What parts of the article would you like to work on? I am easy about this, but once I know what I'm going to do, I can begin to collect source materials. I'm bogged down with Grainger at the moment, but will perhaps have something reviewable in about a week. Then I want to do [[Kathleen Ferrier]]; I need to do a "nice" person, after my recent preoccupations with Delius (syphilis), Tom Driberg (sexual predator) Nixon (all-round bad egg) and Grainger (flagellant racist with syphilitic father). Of course I'll probably find that Kathleen was a crack cocaine addict who practised baby-farming. We shall see. Anyway, hopefully ''Messiah'' can begin in earnest by mid-June. Let me know if you see any problems with that timescale. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 10:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
2980 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2979 +++$+++ 2979 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.305422220E09 +++$+++ Have you seen pp. 16-17 of today's ''Guardian'' review section? An article by [[Harry Christophers]] on tonight's \"Supersize\" ''Messiah'' at the RFH. Come to think of it, you're probably there in the audience, right now. But the article is worth hanging on to (performance history and all that).  +++$+++ :Have you seen pp. 16-17 of today's ''Guardian'' review section? An article by [[Harry Christophers]] on tonight's "Supersize" ''Messiah'' at the RFH. Come to think of it, you're probably there in the audience, right now. But the article is worth hanging on to (performance history and all that). [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 18:17, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

527268 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-10 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.239349200E09 +++$+++ I just created a page for [[John F. Bolt]].  Take a look and have a crack at any corrections you think could be made. Thanks-- +++$+++ I just created a page for [[John F. Bolt]].  Take a look and have a crack at any corrections you think could be made. Thanks--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] ([[User talk:Looper5920|talk]]) 00:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
527269 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527268 +++$+++ 527268 +++$+++ 2009-04-11 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.239436740E09 +++$+++ Do you think Bolt might be a god DYK candidate?-- +++$+++ :Do you think Bolt might be a god DYK candidate?--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] ([[User talk:Looper5920|talk]]) 00:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

2983 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-09 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.304967600E09 +++$+++ I've looked over the JSTOR and press articles; there's some pretty good stuff there, for which many thanks. You can view the full list of assembled sources [[User:Brianboulton\/Sandbox7|here]]; it looks impressive. I hope to be at work on this next wek, when Grainger is safely in peer review.  +++$+++ I've looked over the JSTOR and press articles; there's some pretty good stuff there, for which many thanks. You can view the full list of assembled sources [[User:Brianboulton/Sandbox7|here]]; it looks impressive. I hope to be at work on this next wek, when Grainger is safely in peer review. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 12:00, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
2984 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2983 +++$+++ 2983 +++$+++ 2011-05-25 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.306343100E09 +++$+++ Among the stuff you sent was a Sunday Times review by Humphrey Burton, dated 24.4.88, of Leonard's Ferrier biography. Burton's piece contains a passage I'd like to quote. Do you have a page number for the review? As there is no online link, FAC reviewers will require a page reference.  +++$+++ :Among the stuff you sent was a Sunday Times review by Humphrey Burton, dated 24.4.88, of Leonard's Ferrier biography. Burton's piece contains a passage I'd like to quote. Do you have a page number for the review? As there is no online link, FAC reviewers will require a page reference. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 10:05, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

568476 +++$+++ Helwer7 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568476 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-28 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.151488380E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Helwer7|Helwer7]] 02:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
568477 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568476 +++$+++ 568476 +++$+++ 2006-06-28 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.151498700E09 +++$+++ Hello! I am by no means an expert on copyright matters but I have done some research for you.  An American contributor looking at an American book cover could probably use {{tl|Book cover}} under the [[Wikipedia:Fair_use#Tagging_fair_use_image_files Fair Use]] convention. [[Wikipedia:Copyrights#Using_copyrighted_work_from_others]] states that you must make a note of the fact that you have obtained permission of some kind from the copyright holder, along with names and dates, where appropriate.  Please study these guidelines carefully before deciding whether to use the cover images or not.  There are many book cover images on Wikipedia. Take a look at the permissions associated with other covers in order to guide your decision, bearing in mind the above advice. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ :Hello! I am by no means an expert on copyright matters but I have done some research for you.  An American contributor looking at an American book cover could probably use {{tl|Book cover}} under the [[Wikipedia:Fair_use#Tagging_fair_use_image_files Fair Use]] convention. [[Wikipedia:Copyrights#Using_copyrighted_work_from_others]] states that you must make a note of the fact that you have obtained permission of some kind from the copyright holder, along with names and dates, where appropriate.  Please study these guidelines carefully before deciding whether to use the cover images or not.  There are many book cover images on Wikipedia. Take a look at the permissions associated with other covers in order to guide your decision, bearing in mind the above advice. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 05:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

2987 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-12 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.305249300E09 +++$+++ At last I have sent Percy to peer review, though I'm still tweaking and polishing. It really does need someone uninvolved to look it over, as I have been pretty well the only active editor in the month since I began working on it. I'd be very obliged if you could comment \u2013 don't forget to listen to the sound file, and to the couple of soundlinks in the External links section (Percy's rapid-fire performance of \"Country Gardens\" is a particular delight). I'll be happy to return the review favour whenever necessary.  +++$+++ At last I have sent Percy to peer review, though I'm still tweaking and polishing. It really does need someone uninvolved to look it over, as I have been pretty well the only active editor in the month since I began working on it. I'd be very obliged if you could comment – don't forget to listen to the sound file, and to the couple of soundlinks in the External links section (Percy's rapid-fire performance of "Country Gardens" is a particular delight). I'll be happy to return the review favour whenever necessary. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 18:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
2988 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2987 +++$+++ 2987 +++$+++ 2011-05-20 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.305960540E09 +++$+++ I've decided to send Percy to FAC, as the PR seems to be complete now. Thanks again for your comments.  +++$+++ :I've decided to send Percy to FAC, as the PR seems to be complete now. Thanks again for your comments. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 23:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

2989 +++$+++ Voceditenore +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2989 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-27 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.306527300E09 +++$+++ Just a note to say what a wonderful job you did on this article. Thanks so much! Best,  +++$+++ Just a note to say what a wonderful job you did on this article. Thanks so much! Best, [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 13:15, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
2990 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2989 +++$+++ 2989 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.306527840E09 +++$+++ Gosh! Thank ''you'' so much!  +++$+++ :Gosh! Thank ''you'' so much! [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 13:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
2991 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2989 +++$+++ 2990 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.306533420E09 +++$+++ Yes, great work. But no mention of Grainger? Dearie, dearie me!  +++$+++ ::Yes, great work. But no mention of Grainger? Dearie, dearie me! [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 14:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
2992 +++$+++ Voceditenore +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2989 +++$+++ 2991 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.306543080E09 +++$+++ Aaargh ;-) That one was off my radar completely, Brian. Just nipped 'round and had a look...brilliant! What a pity he never wrote an opera. I'd love to have him the Opera portal. I was going to suggest it to [[Portal:Australian music]], until I saw the contents, which are just a tad... er... one-sided. Anyhow, I added it to the list of FAs over at [[WP:WikiProject Composers|WikiProject Composers]] and the Delius one too. They seem to be a little dozy over there these days. Best,  +++$+++ :::Aaargh ;-) That one was off my radar completely, Brian. Just nipped 'round and had a look...brilliant! What a pity he never wrote an opera. I'd love to have him the Opera portal. I was going to suggest it to [[Portal:Australian music]], until I saw the contents, which are just a tad... er... one-sided. Anyhow, I added it to the list of FAs over at [[WP:WikiProject Composers|WikiProject Composers]] and the Delius one too. They seem to be a little dozy over there these days. Best, [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 17:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
2993 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2989 +++$+++ 2992 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.306547040E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I was not actually fishing for compliments re Percy; I was teasing Tim for not mentioning PG in his impressive expansion of the Nellie article (there is no real reason why he should, of course, but they did meet and even worked together briefly). I'm not really surprised that the Australian music portal has little on Grainger, since he hardly lived there and wrote very little characteristically Australian music. Grainger doesn't neatly fit into portals, being more or less unclassifiable.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks! I was not actually fishing for compliments re Percy; I was teasing Tim for not mentioning PG in his impressive expansion of the Nellie article (there is no real reason why he should, of course, but they did meet and even worked together briefly). I'm not really surprised that the Australian music portal has little on Grainger, since he hardly lived there and wrote very little characteristically Australian music. Grainger doesn't neatly fit into portals, being more or less unclassifiable. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 18:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
2994 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2989 +++$+++ 2993 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.306552020E09 +++$+++ Glass of white wine anyone? A plate of macaroni and a rusk? Either Grainger's dad built something for Melba or Melba's dad built something for the Graingers, but I can't now remember which.  +++$+++ :::::Glass of white wine anyone? A plate of macaroni and a rusk? Either Grainger's dad built something for Melba or Melba's dad built something for the Graingers, but I can't now remember which. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 20:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
2995 +++$+++ Voceditenore +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2989 +++$+++ 2992 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.306554660E09 +++$+++ Too bad there's not a [[Portal:Eccentrics]]. But I guess that wouldn't be very \"PC\"...  +++$+++ ::::Too bad there's not a [[Portal:Eccentrics]]. But I guess that wouldn't be very "PC"... [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 20:51, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
2996 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2989 +++$+++ 2995 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.306556640E09 +++$+++ God bless and save us! I shall have to go away and write an article about [[Edith Sitwell]]'s book, ''English Eccentrics''.  +++$+++ :::::God bless and save us! I shall have to go away and write an article about [[Edith Sitwell]]'s book, ''English Eccentrics''. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 21:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
2997 +++$+++ Voceditenore +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2989 +++$+++ 2996 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.306557540E09 +++$+++ And after that [[Portal:Dictator kitsch]]. At the OP we thought this might be suitable for Kim Jong-Il's ''[[Sea of Blood]]'',  Hitler's paintings, Saddam Hussein's romantic novels, Mussolini's poems and Colonel Gaddafi's short stories (they used to be best sellers in Egypt, apparently).  +++$+++ ::::::And after that [[Portal:Dictator kitsch]]. At the OP we thought this might be suitable for Kim Jong-Il's ''[[Sea of Blood]]'',  Hitler's paintings, Saddam Hussein's romantic novels, Mussolini's poems and Colonel Gaddafi's short stories (they used to be best sellers in Egypt, apparently). [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 21:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
2998 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 2989 +++$+++ 2997 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.306566000E09 +++$+++ NB Edith Sitwell is on my \"to do\" list, possibly early next year if I last that long.  +++$+++ :::::::NB Edith Sitwell is on my "to do" list, possibly early next year if I last that long. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 00:00, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

558758 +++$+++ Dgies +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558758 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-27 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.177681380E09 +++$+++ I was looking at that report and it doesn't look quite like vandalism, more like a clumsy attempt to introduce a new article on someone with the same name.  <font face=\"monospace\"> +++$+++ I was looking at that report and it doesn't look quite like vandalism, more like a clumsy attempt to introduce a new article on someone with the same name.  <font face="monospace">[[User:Dgies|<font color="#00F">'''&mdash;dgies'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Dgies|t]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Dgies|c]]</sub></font> 06:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
558759 +++$+++  +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558758 +++$+++ 558758 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.177681860E09 +++$+++ Looks like pure vandalism to me. Google says there is no \"Jade Goody\" who wrote a book called \"A Beautiful Pig\", nor any \"Beautiful Pig\" winning a Booker Prize, nor any Jade Goody winning a Booker Prize. They do have the unblock template if they want to use it, and they're getting the orange bars, because they've blanked the page already. \xb7\xb7[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=\" font-variant: small-caps\" >l<\/span>]][[ user talk:coelacan |acan]] 06:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :Looks like pure vandalism to me. Google says there is no "Jade Goody" who wrote a book called "A Beautiful Pig", nor any "Beautiful Pig" winning a Booker Prize, nor any Jade Goody winning a Booker Prize. They do have the unblock template if they want to use it, and they're getting the orange bars, because they've blanked the page already. ··[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=" font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>]][[ user talk:coelacan |acan]] 06:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
558760 +++$+++ Dgies +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558758 +++$+++ 558759 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.177682160E09 +++$+++ Maybe your nonsense detector is more sensitive than mine... <font face=\"monospace\"> +++$+++ :: Maybe your nonsense detector is more sensitive than mine... <font face="monospace">[[User:Dgies|<font color="#00F">'''&mdash;dgies'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Dgies|t]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Dgies|c]]</sub></font> 06:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
558761 +++$+++  +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558758 +++$+++ 558760 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.177682460E09 +++$+++ I checked one more thing too, there's no Jade Goody who writes for The Economist. So imo that seals it. \xb7\xb7[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=\" font-variant: small-caps\" >l<\/span>]][[ user talk:coelacan |acan]] 07:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :::I checked one more thing too, there's no Jade Goody who writes for The Economist. So imo that seals it. ··[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=" font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>]][[ user talk:coelacan |acan]] 07:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
558762 +++$+++ Dgies +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558758 +++$+++ 558761 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.177682580E09 +++$+++ On closer examination, it's definitely a load of horseshit. <font face=\"monospace\"> +++$+++ :::: On closer examination, it's definitely a load of horseshit. <font face="monospace">[[User:Dgies|<font color="#00F">'''&mdash;dgies'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Dgies|t]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Dgies|c]]</sub></font> 07:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
558763 +++$+++ Minestrone Soup +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558758 +++$+++ 558758 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.177682340E09 +++$+++ No thanks, i've already resized the image myself :-) [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?offset=&limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Minestrone+Soup&namespace=6] <span style=\"font-size:14px;\"> [[Image:Gaim.svg|27px]]  +++$+++ :No thanks, i've already resized the image myself :-) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?offset=&limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Minestrone+Soup&namespace=6] <span style="font-size:14px;"> [[Image:Gaim.svg|27px]] [[User:Minestrone Soup|♥♥ ΜÏΠЄSΓRΘΠ€ ♥♥]] <sup>[[User talk:Minestrone Soup|slurp me!]]</sup></span> 06:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
558764 +++$+++ Minestrone Soup +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558758 +++$+++ 558758 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.177687560E09 +++$+++ Oops! Sorry, i'll change it. I think i copied and pasted it from somewhere. <span style=\"font-size:14px;\"> [[Image:Gaim.svg|27px]]  +++$+++ :Oops! Sorry, i'll change it. I think i copied and pasted it from somewhere. <span style="font-size:14px;"> [[Image:Gaim.svg|27px]] [[User:Minestrone Soup|♥♥ ΜÏΠЄSΓRΘΠ€ ♥♥]] <sup>[[User talk:Minestrone Soup|slurp me!]]</sup></span> 08:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

527280 +++$+++ Chris G Bot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-15 09:24:00 +++$+++ 1.242404640E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> [[User:Chris G Bot|Chris G Bot]] ([[User talk:Chris G Bot|talk]]) 09:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
527281 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527280 +++$+++ 527280 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.242915960E09 +++$+++ I've taken care of this. ''' +++$+++ :I've taken care of this. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  07:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

265138 +++$+++ Chick Bowen +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265138 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-07 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.223376360E09 +++$+++ This is to let you know that I've orphaned the [[fair use]] image [[:Image:Framley Parsonage Penguin cover.jpg]], and replaced it with [[:Image:Framley Parsonage serialized.jpg]], an image in the [[public domain]].  For more information, see the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Free book covers|book cover replacement project]].  Thanks. +++$+++ This is to let you know that I've orphaned the [[fair use]] image [[:Image:Framley Parsonage Penguin cover.jpg]], and replaced it with [[:Image:Framley Parsonage serialized.jpg]], an image in the [[public domain]].  For more information, see the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Free book covers|book cover replacement project]].  Thanks.[[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 03:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
265139 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265138 +++$+++ 265138 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.223422080E09 +++$+++ Nice work. +++$+++ :Nice work.[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 16:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

527283 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-06 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.244329680E09 +++$+++ Thought I'd give you a heads up: [[Portal talk:United States Marine Corps#new section]]. ''' +++$+++ Thought I'd give you a heads up: [[Portal talk:United States Marine Corps#new section]]. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  16:08, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
527284 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527283 +++$+++ 527283 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.244915880E09 +++$+++ Take a look at all of the months if you get some time and make your usual tweaks: [[Portal:United States Marine Corps\/history]]. You're pretty good at the polishing-off of portal items. ''' +++$+++ :Take a look at all of the months if you get some time and make your usual tweaks: [[Portal:United States Marine Corps/history]]. You're pretty good at the polishing-off of portal items. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  10:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

265140 +++$+++ Blue-Haired Lawyer +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265140 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-11 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.223750100E09 +++$+++ Hey Lumos3, I noticed that you've been date linking years on articles. This form of linking is strongly discouraged, per [[WP:OVERLINK#Dates]], as is the old <nowiki>[[1 January]] [[2000]]<\/nowiki> style links, per [[MOS:UNLINKDATES]].  +++$+++ Hey Lumos3, I noticed that you've been date linking years on articles. This form of linking is strongly discouraged, per [[WP:OVERLINK#Dates]], as is the old <nowiki>[[1 January]] [[2000]]</nowiki> style links, per [[MOS:UNLINKDATES]]. [[User:Blue-Haired Lawyer|Blue-Haired Lawyer]] 11:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
265141 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265140 +++$+++ 265140 +++$+++ 2008-10-11 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.223750460E09 +++$+++ I think you have misread this . Only auto formatting of dates has been deprecated. The linking of significant ( not all) dates in an article has always been  part  of Wikipedia's style and provides a useful  chronological orientation to the reader.  It allows the cultural placement of one event with what else was happening around the same time in other fields. There is an active group on Wikipedia trying to ban date linking but not consensus has been reached.  +++$+++ :I think you have misread this . Only auto formatting of dates has been deprecated. The linking of significant ( not all) dates in an article has always been  part  of Wikipedia's style and provides a useful  chronological orientation to the reader.  It allows the cultural placement of one event with what else was happening around the same time in other fields. There is an active group on Wikipedia trying to ban date linking but not consensus has been reached. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 11:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
265142 +++$+++ Blue-Haired Lawyer +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265140 +++$+++ 265141 +++$+++ 2008-10-11 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.223751540E09 +++$+++ How exactly am I misreading this? Given that you agree autolinking dates has been depreciated, how do you explain [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Frank_Gehry&diff=prev&oldid=244346860 this edit]?  +++$+++ ::How exactly am I misreading this? Given that you agree autolinking dates has been depreciated, how do you explain [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frank_Gehry&diff=prev&oldid=244346860 this edit]? [[User:Blue-Haired Lawyer|Blue-Haired Lawyer]] 11:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
265143 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265140 +++$+++ 265142 +++$+++ 2008-10-11 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.223753280E09 +++$+++ I only link dates that \"deepen a readers understanding of a subject\". So pivotal dates in a person's life or the dates of major events in a topic's history. This has long been, and remains, standard practice thought Wikipedia. I disagree with tentative proposals to ban all date linking starting with birth and death dates in biographies. See the discussion [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#RfC:_Linking_of_dates_of_birth_and_death]]  +++$+++ :::I only link dates that "deepen a readers understanding of a subject". So pivotal dates in a person's life or the dates of major events in a topic's history. This has long been, and remains, standard practice thought Wikipedia. I disagree with tentative proposals to ban all date linking starting with birth and death dates in biographies. See the discussion [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#RfC:_Linking_of_dates_of_birth_and_death]] [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 12:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
265144 +++$+++ Blue-Haired Lawyer +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265140 +++$+++ 265143 +++$+++ 2008-10-11 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.223760480E09 +++$+++ The proposal clearly appears to be to link such dates rather than ban such links. You have written \"Support\" beside you post. The proposal to link these dates kind of under-lines the fact that linking isolated years has been depreciated for much longer that the autoformatting debate, as per the quote above. In any case \"a useful  chronological orientation to the reader\" would only be achieved if Wikipedia had pages on specific dates ([[1 January 2000]]) and not just dates of the year ([[1 January]]).  +++$+++ ::::The proposal clearly appears to be to link such dates rather than ban such links. You have written "Support" beside you post. The proposal to link these dates kind of under-lines the fact that linking isolated years has been depreciated for much longer that the autoformatting debate, as per the quote above. In any case "a useful  chronological orientation to the reader" would only be achieved if Wikipedia had pages on specific dates ([[1 January 2000]]) and not just dates of the year ([[1 January]]). [[User:Blue-Haired Lawyer|Blue-Haired Lawyer]] 14:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
265145 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265140 +++$+++ 265143 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.223961240E09 +++$+++ Historical orientation is best given by reviewing other events of that year. Events coincidental on the same day have little meaning.  +++$+++ ::::Historical orientation is best given by reviewing other events of that year. Events coincidental on the same day have little meaning. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 22:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
265146 +++$+++ Blue-Haired Lawyer +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265140 +++$+++ 265145 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.223965320E09 +++$+++ This is exactly what I was saying. This is was the current linking method on Wikipedia ([[23 May]] [[1960]]) makes no sense.  +++$+++ :::::This is exactly what I was saying. This is was the current linking method on Wikipedia ([[23 May]] [[1960]]) makes no sense. [[User:Blue-Haired Lawyer|Blue-Haired Lawyer]] 23:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
265147 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265140 +++$+++ 265146 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.225440060E09 +++$+++ Linking of years gives historical orientation. Linking of calendar dates gives human interest - Witness the widespread use of \"On this day\" columns in the media including Wikipedia main page.  +++$+++ ::::::Linking of years gives historical orientation. Linking of calendar dates gives human interest - Witness the widespread use of "On this day" columns in the media including Wikipedia main page. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 01:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
265148 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265140 +++$+++ 265147 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.225440540E09 +++$+++ Can you explain what [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Richard_Hawkins&diff=248730440&oldid=248727656 this] adds to the article please? Thanks in advance. -- +++$+++ :::::::Can you explain what [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Hawkins&diff=248730440&oldid=248727656 this] adds to the article please? Thanks in advance. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 01:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
265149 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265140 +++$+++ 265147 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.225471800E09 +++$+++ Linking of significant dates ( note I don't say all dates ) in an article allows the reader to quickly orientate to events in the world at the time giving context and deeper understanding. In a biographical article the vital dates are significant , they show the world into which the individual entered at birth  and how it was when they left in death. Linking the calender date (day + month) of significant events as well as looking better, satisfies a wider human interest demonstrated by the widespread \"On this day\" columns in the media, including Wikipedia's main page. There is no Wikipedia policy saying dates must never be linked although I see you have personally taken this to be the case. Perhaps you can explain how this benefits Wikipedia?  +++$+++ ::::::: Linking of significant dates ( note I don't say all dates ) in an article allows the reader to quickly orientate to events in the world at the time giving context and deeper understanding. In a biographical article the vital dates are significant , they show the world into which the individual entered at birth  and how it was when they left in death. Linking the calender date (day + month) of significant events as well as looking better, satisfies a wider human interest demonstrated by the widespread "On this day" columns in the media, including Wikipedia's main page. There is no Wikipedia policy saying dates must never be linked although I see you have personally taken this to be the case. Perhaps you can explain how this benefits Wikipedia? [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 09:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

527285 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-19 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.245454080E09 +++$+++ I wanted to throw this up on your admin radar: [[User:Doodoobear1856]] is a vandalism-only account, and has thrown some nasty comments on my talk page. Tony said that he would take care of him if he did it again, but I think he (Tony) is done for the night, and I was hoping you could get to it before he does. 'Twould be much appreciated if you can help in some way. ''' +++$+++ I wanted to throw this up on your admin radar: [[User:Doodoobear1856]] is a vandalism-only account, and has thrown some nasty comments on my talk page. Tony said that he would take care of him if he did it again, but I think he (Tony) is done for the night, and I was hoping you could get to it before he does. 'Twould be much appreciated if you can help in some way. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  16:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
527286 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527285 +++$+++ 527285 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.245717360E09 +++$+++ The above matter has been settled. Here's something else for you though: [[Archibald Sommers]] is in desperate need of your biography magic. ''' +++$+++ :The above matter has been settled. Here's something else for you though: [[Archibald Sommers]] is in desperate need of your biography magic. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  17:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

527287 +++$+++ Historicist +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-24 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.245904740E09 +++$+++ There is an AFD on  page you edited, [[Brian D. Beaudreault]]. +++$+++ There is an AFD on  page you edited, [[Brian D. Beaudreault]].[[User:Historicist|Historicist]] ([[User talk:Historicist|talk]]) 21:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
527288 +++$+++ Cyberherbalist +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527287 +++$+++ 527287 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.246362600E09 +++$+++ Nevermind, ERCheck!  I saw that you hadn't been around for several days, and that I needed to take matters into my own hands.  I reported the guy for edit warring (and sockpuppetry, too), and the matter is apparently resolved.  So, we're good to go.   +++$+++ :Nevermind, ERCheck!  I saw that you hadn't been around for several days, and that I needed to take matters into my own hands.  I reported the guy for edit warring (and sockpuppetry, too), and the matter is apparently resolved.  So, we're good to go.  [[User:Cyberherbalist|Mike]] ([[User talk:Cyberherbalist|talk]]) 04:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

3000 +++$+++ Tbhotch +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-30 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.306805280E09 +++$+++ Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of [[Edward Elgar|this article]] know that it will be appearing as [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article|the main page featured article]] on June 2, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article\/June 2, 2011]]. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director {{user|Raul654}} or at [[Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article\/requests]]. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it\u2014following the instructions of [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article\/requests\/instructions|the suggested formatting]]. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the [[Main Page]] so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! <small>[[User talk: Tbhotch\/Signature|<font color=\"#DAA520\">\u06de<\/font>]]<\/small> [[User:Tbhotch|<font color=\"#4B0082\">Tb<\/font><font color=\"#6082B6\">hotch<\/font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tbhotch|<font color=\"#555555\"><big>\u2122<\/big><\/font>]]<\/sup> & [[Special:Contributions\/Tbhotch|<font color=\"#006600\">(\u2184)]],  +++$+++ Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of [[Edward Elgar|this article]] know that it will be appearing as [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article|the main page featured article]] on June 2, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 2, 2011]]. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director {{user|Raul654}} or at [[Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests]]. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions|the suggested formatting]]. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the [[Main Page]] so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! <small>[[User talk: Tbhotch/Signature|<font color="#DAA520">۞</font>]]</small> [[User:Tbhotch|<font color="#4B0082">Tb</font><font color="#6082B6">hotch</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tbhotch|<font color="#555555"><big>™</big></font>]]</sup> & [[Special:Contributions/Tbhotch|<font color="#006600">(ↄ)]], [[User:Tbhotch/EN|<font color="#2C1608">Problems with my English?</font>]] 18:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
3001 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3000 +++$+++ 3000 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.307016660E09 +++$+++ '''Hearty congratulations, Tim!''' --  +++$+++ *'''Hearty congratulations, Tim!''' -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 05:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

527289 +++$+++ Cyberherbalist +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-28 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.246230420E09 +++$+++ Hi ERCheck.  Since you've been involved with the article on [[ACN Inc.|ACN]], I am turning to you in the hope that you could possibly have a look at what a brand-new user going by the moniker of TheEditor22 is doing to it?  Have a look also at what he's been saying on the Talk page (and my own [[User talk:Cyberherbalist#ACN|user Talk]] page.  He seems to be a bit ... odd. I'm not experienced in it, but it appears there needs to be some kind of dispute resolution needed, and talking with him isn't going to do it, as he seems to think he's acting according to some kind of Wikipedia consensus.  +++$+++ Hi ERCheck.  Since you've been involved with the article on [[ACN Inc.|ACN]], I am turning to you in the hope that you could possibly have a look at what a brand-new user going by the moniker of TheEditor22 is doing to it?  Have a look also at what he's been saying on the Talk page (and my own [[User talk:Cyberherbalist#ACN|user Talk]] page.  He seems to be a bit ... odd. I'm not experienced in it, but it appears there needs to be some kind of dispute resolution needed, and talking with him isn't going to do it, as he seems to think he's acting according to some kind of Wikipedia consensus. [[User:Cyberherbalist|Mike]] ([[User talk:Cyberherbalist|talk]]) 16:07, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
527290 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527289 +++$+++ 527289 +++$+++ 2009-06-27 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.246160520E09 +++$+++ An Amyway presenter says \"this is the best opportunity in the world, that exists, period\". This article just clafifies how deluded you are, or indeed, how incredibily biased you are. I am almost certain that you are in some way renumerated by presenting this MLM companies as being legitimate. Yes...I've looked through your history. You are a truly evil character, to want to deceive somewhat naive people into believing that these MLM companies are a good opportunity. In fact, you truly sicken me. --TheEditor22 (talk) 20:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ :An Amyway presenter says "this is the best opportunity in the world, that exists, period". This article just clafifies how deluded you are, or indeed, how incredibily biased you are. I am almost certain that you are in some way renumerated by presenting this MLM companies as being legitimate. Yes...I've looked through your history. You are a truly evil character, to want to deceive somewhat naive people into believing that these MLM companies are a good opportunity. In fact, you truly sicken me. --TheEditor22 (talk) 20:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

3002 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-31 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.306900500E09 +++$+++ Hi John! I noticed you mentioning that a message from you got deleted from Ssilvers' user page. That's because it was posted on his main user page, rather than his user talk \/ discussion page. Usually messages on user talk pages won't get immediately deleted, but it's considered rude to post on their main user page. If it was just an accident, then sorry for dragging it out; I just noticed that you had posted on a few people's main user pages recently. Cheers--ragesoss (talk) 20:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ Hi John! I noticed you mentioning that a message from you got deleted from Ssilvers' user page. That's because it was posted on his main user page, rather than his user talk / discussion page. Usually messages on user talk pages won't get immediately deleted, but it's considered rude to post on their main user page. If it was just an accident, then sorry for dragging it out; I just noticed that you had posted on a few people's main user pages recently. Cheers--ragesoss (talk) 20:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
3003 +++$+++ John Thaxter +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3002 +++$+++ 3002 +++$+++ 2011-06-01 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.306956480E09 +++$+++ Dear Ragesoss, Thanks for pointing out the problem, which was caused by my clicking on my intended addressees name then not recognising that I had reached a USER rather than USER TALK page, especially since the User pages in question, looked very like User Talk pages.  However, my apologies to Tim riley and Ssilvers for my error and of course, NO rudeness intended since in each case I have been massively grateful for their help.  +++$+++ :Dear Ragesoss, Thanks for pointing out the problem, which was caused by my clicking on my intended addressees name then not recognising that I had reached a USER rather than USER TALK page, especially since the User pages in question, looked very like User Talk pages.  However, my apologies to Tim riley and Ssilvers for my error and of course, NO rudeness intended since in each case I have been massively grateful for their help. [[User:John Thaxter|John Thaxter]] ([[User talk:John Thaxter|talk]]) 12:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
3004 +++$+++ John Thaxter +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3002 +++$+++ 3003 +++$+++ 2011-06-01 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.306958640E09 +++$+++ Dear Tim, Apologies for my gaffe and thanks for your help with the Everyman link! Regards,  +++$+++ ::Dear Tim, Apologies for my gaffe and thanks for your help with the Everyman link! Regards, [[User:John Thaxter|John Thaxter]] ([[User talk:John Thaxter|talk]]) 13:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

3005 +++$+++ Kenatipo +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-02 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.307063160E09 +++$+++ Hi, Tim.  Congrats on the article.  Question:  one of the main sources is Moore's 1984 book.  But, the references say Moore (1986).   +++$+++ Hi, Tim.  Congrats on the article.  Question:  one of the main sources is Moore's 1984 book.  But, the references say Moore (1986).  [[User:Kenatipo|<span style="color:#933;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''<big>Kenatipo</big>'''</span>]]  <sup>[[User talk:Kenatipo|speak!]]</sup> 18:06, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
3006 +++$+++ Kenatipo +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3005 +++$+++ 3005 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.307065080E09 +++$+++ Would have changed them all to (1984) but didn't want to guess.  Also ref #94 says plain old Moore, with no year.   +++$+++ :Would have changed them all to (1984) but didn't want to guess.  Also ref #94 says plain old Moore, with no year.  [[User:Kenatipo|<span style="color:#933;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''<big>Kenatipo</big>'''</span>]]  <sup>[[User talk:Kenatipo|speak!]]</sup> 18:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
3007 +++$+++ Kenatipo +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3005 +++$+++ 3006 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.307078100E09 +++$+++ I just read your note on my talkpage.  Thank ''you'' for all your hard work in making worthwhile articles!   +++$+++ ::I just read your note on my talkpage.  Thank ''you'' for all your hard work in making worthwhile articles!  [[User:Kenatipo|<span style="color:#933;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''<big>Kenatipo</big>'''</span>]]  <sup>[[User talk:Kenatipo|speak!]]</sup> 22:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

265150 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-31 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.225485540E09 +++$+++ Can you specifically say how the articles at [[17 April]] and at [[1622]] enhance the reader's understanding of [[Richard Hawkins]]? Can you provide evidence that this is the case, or is it just your own opinion? Failing that, per [[WP:CONTEXT]], these should not be linked. This benefits Wikipedia by focusing the reader's attention on links which actually go somewhere useful, as described in the guideline I already linked you to. If you are unable to properly answer the questions above, I think you should undo your edit, unless of course you were doing it just to make a [[WP:POINT]], which I'm sure isn't true. -- +++$+++ Can you specifically say how the articles at [[17 April]] and at [[1622]] enhance the reader's understanding of [[Richard Hawkins]]? Can you provide evidence that this is the case, or is it just your own opinion? Failing that, per [[WP:CONTEXT]], these should not be linked. This benefits Wikipedia by focusing the reader's attention on links which actually go somewhere useful, as described in the guideline I already linked you to. If you are unable to properly answer the questions above, I think you should undo your edit, unless of course you were doing it just to make a [[WP:POINT]], which I'm sure isn't true. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 13:39, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
265151 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265150 +++$+++ 265150 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.225489560E09 +++$+++ I have just stated clearly my reasons. These apply equally to the birth and death dates of Richard Hawkins as they do to any significant date in any Wikipedia article. Are you accusing me of editing in bad faith? [[WP:AGF]]. I repeat significant dates in an article enhance the reader's understanding by giving historical context. Anniversary dates are interesting , we might well see Richard Hawkins on next April 17 in the \"On this day\" feature. People are widely interested in anniversaries even if some see them as trivia.   +++$+++ :I have just stated clearly my reasons. These apply equally to the birth and death dates of Richard Hawkins as they do to any significant date in any Wikipedia article. Are you accusing me of editing in bad faith? [[WP:AGF]]. I repeat significant dates in an article enhance the reader's understanding by giving historical context. Anniversary dates are interesting , we might well see Richard Hawkins on next April 17 in the "On this day" feature. People are widely interested in anniversaries even if some see them as trivia.  [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 14:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
265152 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265150 +++$+++ 265151 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.225491420E09 +++$+++ I see this practice as needlessly duplicating the \"On this day\" feature, which I agree is a worthwhile thing, at the cost of adding many low- or zero-value links. In closing, have you even read these articles you are insisting on linking to here? -- +++$+++ ::I see this practice as needlessly duplicating the "On this day" feature, which I agree is a worthwhile thing, at the cost of adding many low- or zero-value links. In closing, have you even read these articles you are insisting on linking to here? --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 15:17, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
265153 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265150 +++$+++ 265152 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.225494660E09 +++$+++ I would hold both 1 and 2 above to be self evident to anyone.  I should not need to justify retention , it is you who are promoting change. The linking of dates argument  ([[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#RfC:_Linking_of_dates_of_birth_and_death]]) is still in progress and you have no mandate to begin wholesale de-linking. +++$+++ :::I would hold both 1 and 2 above to be self evident to anyone.  I should not need to justify retention , it is you who are promoting change. The linking of dates argument  ([[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#RfC:_Linking_of_dates_of_birth_and_death]]) is still in progress and you have no mandate to begin wholesale de-linking.[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 16:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
265154 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265150 +++$+++ 265153 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.225495080E09 +++$+++ Got you. I see now that this preference is merely your own opinion and thus has neither consensus nor any other justification behind it. Per [[WP:CONTEXT]], the onus is on you to demonstrate evidence that these links benefit our readers. As you are unable to do so I shall assume that any further edits like this are merely [[WP:POINT|point]]-making. I note also that you did not answer my question about whether you read these articles which you consider so vital to link to. -- +++$+++ ::::Got you. I see now that this preference is merely your own opinion and thus has neither consensus nor any other justification behind it. Per [[WP:CONTEXT]], the onus is on you to demonstrate evidence that these links benefit our readers. As you are unable to do so I shall assume that any further edits like this are merely [[WP:POINT|point]]-making. I note also that you did not answer my question about whether you read these articles which you consider so vital to link to. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 16:18, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
265155 +++$+++ JackofOz +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265150 +++$+++ 265153 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.226563920E09 +++$+++ I agree with John.  Lumos3, your recent edit summaries are saying ''\"Wikipedia's policy is to link significant dates. Birth and death in a biography are significant\"''.  That is '''not''' what WP's policy says <u>at all<\/u>.  It says: \"Stand-alone chronological links should '''generally not be linked, unless they are demonstrably likely to deepen readers' understanding of a topic'''\".  If knowing what other events also happened in the year or on the date the subject was born or died is necessary to deepen readers' understanding of the subject, then those events should be, and usually are, discussed in the article itself.  Those who are interested merely in \"On This Day\"-type information can get it independently.  This is the only rationale you've provided for linking vital dates, and it does not demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.  I suggest you need to refrain from re-linking dates that have been de-linked, unless, in any particular case, you can find a better reason than the \"On This Day\" argument.  Such an argument would apply ''only'' to the subject at hand, and not as a blanket argument to link all vital dates in all articles.  --   +++$+++ ::::I agree with John.  Lumos3, your recent edit summaries are saying ''"Wikipedia's policy is to link significant dates. Birth and death in a biography are significant"''.  That is '''not''' what WP's policy says <u>at all</u>.  It says: "Stand-alone chronological links should '''generally not be linked, unless they are demonstrably likely to deepen readers' understanding of a topic'''".  If knowing what other events also happened in the year or on the date the subject was born or died is necessary to deepen readers' understanding of the subject, then those events should be, and usually are, discussed in the article itself.  Those who are interested merely in "On This Day"-type information can get it independently.  This is the only rationale you've provided for linking vital dates, and it does not demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.  I suggest you need to refrain from re-linking dates that have been de-linked, unless, in any particular case, you can find a better reason than the "On This Day" argument.  Such an argument would apply ''only'' to the subject at hand, and not as a blanket argument to link all vital dates in all articles.  --  [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) 00:12, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265156 +++$+++ Hohenloh +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265150 +++$+++ 265155 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.226563680E09 +++$+++ I can only add that you are wasting your time by re-inserting the date links. Those that are not removed by editors will all be removed by bots anyway.  +++$+++ :::::I can only add that you are wasting your time by re-inserting the date links. Those that are not removed by editors will all be removed by bots anyway. [[User:Hohenloh|<font face="Old English Text MT" color="darkblue" size="2"><b>Hohenloh</b></font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Hohenloh|<font face="Old English Text MT" color="darkblue" size="2">  +  </font>]]</sup>00:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265157 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265150 +++$+++ 265150 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.226583300E09 +++$+++ Lumos3: can you provide examples of how the date links or date-fragment links provide useful information that deepens the readers' understanding of a specific topic? I'm intrigued.  +++$+++ *Lumos3: can you provide examples of how the date links or date-fragment links provide useful information that deepens the readers' understanding of a specific topic? I'm intrigued. [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 05:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

3008 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3008 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-03 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.307140920E09 +++$+++ Thanks for asking - I will be glad to look at the PR, but it will likely take me a few days (we are even more backlogged than usual at peer review).  +++$+++ Thanks for asking - I will be glad to look at the PR, but it will likely take me a few days (we are even more backlogged than usual at peer review). [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 15:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
3009 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3008 +++$+++ 3008 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.307149380E09 +++$+++ Also thanks from me, Tim.  I've had a quick look (and ended up adding succession boxes to the Robertson and Edwards articles and trying to square the box dates with the articles).  Anyway, I'll devote some time to the article this evening.  As ever, links to other articles don't always provide satisfactory results.  Best. --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ :Also thanks from me, Tim.  I've had a quick look (and ended up adding succession boxes to the Robertson and Edwards articles and trying to square the box dates with the articles).  Anyway, I'll devote some time to the article this evening.  As ever, links to other articles don't always provide satisfactory results.  Best. --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 18:03, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
3010 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3008 +++$+++ 3009 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.307776500E09 +++$+++ The picture is on Commons now at [[:File:Deborah Warner's production of Handel's Messiah for the ENO.jpg]] I can re-crop it if you prefer.  +++$+++ ::The picture is on Commons now at [[:File:Deborah Warner's production of Handel's Messiah for the ENO.jpg]] I can re-crop it if you prefer. [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 00:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

3011 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-03 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.307151180E09 +++$+++ I have opened a workpage, [[User:Brianboulton\/Sandbox3|here]], for noting down useful sources etc. Please fel free to add anything that looks useful. Do you have the JSTORs as listed?  +++$+++ I have opened a workpage, [[User:Brianboulton/Sandbox3|here]], for noting down useful sources etc. Please fel free to add anything that looks useful. Do you have the JSTORs as listed? [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 18:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
3012 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3011 +++$+++ 3011 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.307233560E09 +++$+++ I have a ton of JSTOR stuff. I'll email you separately with a link.  +++$+++ :I have a ton of JSTOR stuff. I'll email you separately with a link. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 17:26, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

265159 +++$+++ HWV258 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-13 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.226582340E09 +++$+++ Yes, I agree; and I reverted your edit to the Handel page. My problem with it is that the significance of the dates in question is to provide the reader with direct information about Handel's birth and death, but not for whatever else happened to have occurred on those dates. For example, you've linked Handel's birth date as 23 February 1685, but due to the way WP date-linking works, the 23 February part becomes separate to the link on 1685. Now I'm sure you're not suggesting that anyone could possibly be interested in finding out what happened on 23 February throughout the ages, so the only possibility left is that you are offering people the opportunity to find out what else happened in 1685. As I said in my revert comment, the (I believe tiny percentage of people) who might be interested in finding out what else happened in 1685 can easily type 1685 into the provided WP search box on each page. The disadvantages of linked dates are well documented, and I won't bore you with an already over-covered (and concluded) debate. Thanks for taking an interest in the Handel page.  +++$+++ Yes, I agree; and I reverted your edit to the Handel page. My problem with it is that the significance of the dates in question is to provide the reader with direct information about Handel's birth and death, but not for whatever else happened to have occurred on those dates. For example, you've linked Handel's birth date as 23 February 1685, but due to the way WP date-linking works, the 23 February part becomes separate to the link on 1685. Now I'm sure you're not suggesting that anyone could possibly be interested in finding out what happened on 23 February throughout the ages, so the only possibility left is that you are offering people the opportunity to find out what else happened in 1685. As I said in my revert comment, the (I believe tiny percentage of people) who might be interested in finding out what else happened in 1685 can easily type 1685 into the provided WP search box on each page. The disadvantages of linked dates are well documented, and I won't bore you with an already over-covered (and concluded) debate. Thanks for taking an interest in the Handel page. [[User:HWV258|<b><font style="color:Navy;background:LightSteelBlue;font-family:Arial" size="2">&nbsp;HWV&nbsp;258&nbsp;</font></b>]] 05:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265160 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.226598660E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 09:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265161 +++$+++ JackofOz +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.226612520E09 +++$+++ Nobody's sneering, Lumos3.  But there are a number of people (see above) who are not convinced by your argument, yet you just repeat it ad nauseam, without any attempt to address the counter arguments.  Also, nobody is denying the general interest in \"On This Day\" information.  But are you seriously suggesting that a reader might chance upon, say, [[Stanley Baldwin]]'s article, read that he was born on 3 August, and think to themselves \"I wonder who else was born on 3 August or what historical events happened on 3 August.  I know, I'll click the link and find out\" ? If anyone has an interest in such information, it won't come through reading about Baldwin or Dickens or Lincoln or Margaret Thatcher or anyone else you could name.  It will arise quite independently.  --   +++$+++ :::Nobody's sneering, Lumos3.  But there are a number of people (see above) who are not convinced by your argument, yet you just repeat it ad nauseam, without any attempt to address the counter arguments.  Also, nobody is denying the general interest in "On This Day" information.  But are you seriously suggesting that a reader might chance upon, say, [[Stanley Baldwin]]'s article, read that he was born on 3 August, and think to themselves "I wonder who else was born on 3 August or what historical events happened on 3 August.  I know, I'll click the link and find out" ? If anyone has an interest in such information, it won't come through reading about Baldwin or Dickens or Lincoln or Margaret Thatcher or anyone else you could name.  It will arise quite independently.  --  [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) 13:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265162 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.226635860E09 +++$+++ Nobody's sneering. But your arguments would be taken much more seriously if you could provide evidence that your rationale for wishing to retain these deprecated links was one with any degree of community support behind it. As it is it looks like one person's view, without any properly-thought-out reasoning behind it. I also note you have still not answered my question about the date articles you are so keen on adding links to. The question, in case you have forgotten, is \"Have you read the articles you are linking to?\" -- +++$+++ ::::Nobody's sneering. But your arguments would be taken much more seriously if you could provide evidence that your rationale for wishing to retain these deprecated links was one with any degree of community support behind it. As it is it looks like one person's view, without any properly-thought-out reasoning behind it. I also note you have still not answered my question about the date articles you are so keen on adding links to. The question, in case you have forgotten, is "Have you read the articles you are linking to?" --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 20:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265163 +++$+++ Jheald +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.226642340E09 +++$+++ Well, I fully agree with the three rationales Lumos has given above; and so evidently do about half the Wikipedians who have contributed to the RfC Lumos has cited.  If so many think that such links can be useful and appreciated, why does it matter so much to you that they should be eradicated?   +++$+++ :::::Well, I fully agree with the three rationales Lumos has given above; and so evidently do about half the Wikipedians who have contributed to the RfC Lumos has cited.  If so many think that such links can be useful and appreciated, why does it matter so much to you that they should be eradicated?  [[User:Jheald|Jheald]] ([[User talk:Jheald|talk]]) 21:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265164 +++$+++ HWV258 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.226643180E09 +++$+++ The RfC is titled \"Linking of dates of birth and death\". Could you please explain to us why finding out what else happened on 14 April (the day of Handel's death in 1759) is more significant than finding out what else happened on 13 April (the day of the first performance of Handel's Messiah in 1742)? Either all dates should be linked, or none. Until a better system is designed, I vote for none. +++$+++ ::::::The RfC is titled "Linking of dates of birth and death". Could you please explain to us why finding out what else happened on 14 April (the day of Handel's death in 1759) is more significant than finding out what else happened on 13 April (the day of the first performance of Handel's Messiah in 1742)? Either all dates should be linked, or none. Until a better system is designed, I vote for none.[[User:HWV258|<b><font style="color:Navy;background:LightSteelBlue;font-family:Arial" size="2">&nbsp;HWV&nbsp;258&nbsp;</font></b>]] 22:13, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265165 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.226645760E09 +++$+++ @Jheald; see [[WP:CONTEXT]] for an explanation of why we try to use intelligence and discretion in deciding what to link and what not to. Indiscriminately linking dates (especially when one has no idea just how poor the dates articles tend to be) is contrary to this guideline. -- +++$+++ ::::::@Jheald; see [[WP:CONTEXT]] for an explanation of why we try to use intelligence and discretion in deciding what to link and what not to. Indiscriminately linking dates (especially when one has no idea just how poor the dates articles tend to be) is contrary to this guideline. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 22:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265166 +++$+++ Jheald +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.226647740E09 +++$+++ And see [[WP:BUILD]], that articles should have some links to them; and the snowball keep at [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/March_1|WP:AfD\/March 1]] for an indication as to how much many Wikipedians do value these articles.  I'm not suggesting we link ''all'' dates, but to link ''a'' date is a useful way to let casual readers know that these date pages exist.  And I'm sorry, but some people ''do'' like to know who shared a particular birthday, or anniversary of death; and what was happening in the world at a particular epoch.  +++$+++ :::::::And see [[WP:BUILD]], that articles should have some links to them; and the snowball keep at [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/March_1|WP:AfD/March 1]] for an indication as to how much many Wikipedians do value these articles.  I'm not suggesting we link ''all'' dates, but to link ''a'' date is a useful way to let casual readers know that these date pages exist.  And I'm sorry, but some people ''do'' like to know who shared a particular birthday, or anniversary of death; and what was happening in the world at a particular epoch. [[User:Jheald|Jheald]] ([[User talk:Jheald|talk]]) 23:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265167 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.226649240E09 +++$+++ Well indeed, CONTEXT and BUILD have always existed in dynamic tension with each other. The area of date links was badly fudged because of the stupid autoformatting thing that was applied. Now that this is deprecated, we don't need to indiscriminately link dates any more. People who want to link date articles have seldom in my experience ever actually read any. Have you done so? And the AfD snowball keep is a very poor argument; we would never want to delete the wonderful article we have on the [[United States]], but this is a very far cry from saying it should be linked every single time it is mentioned. So, to clarify, my argument is not about wanting to delete anything, but rather to clearly state that the default should be not to link date articles except in certain clearly defined circumstances. I hope that makes sense. -- +++$+++ ::::::::Well indeed, CONTEXT and BUILD have always existed in dynamic tension with each other. The area of date links was badly fudged because of the stupid autoformatting thing that was applied. Now that this is deprecated, we don't need to indiscriminately link dates any more. People who want to link date articles have seldom in my experience ever actually read any. Have you done so? And the AfD snowball keep is a very poor argument; we would never want to delete the wonderful article we have on the [[United States]], but this is a very far cry from saying it should be linked every single time it is mentioned. So, to clarify, my argument is not about wanting to delete anything, but rather to clearly state that the default should be not to link date articles except in certain clearly defined circumstances. I hope that makes sense. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 23:54, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265168 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ 2008-11-14 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.226684820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 09:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
265169 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-14 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.226734680E09 +++$+++ That's fine, and you have adequately expressed your opinion. The trouble it is is just your opinion. And apparently Jheald's as well. All the two of you need is to mobilize a large group of people and you will have [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] to add links to articles. Meantime, it is just silly to add them knowing that one of the many editors who abide by consensus will remove them again. -- +++$+++ :::That's fine, and you have adequately expressed your opinion. The trouble it is is just your opinion. And apparently Jheald's as well. All the two of you need is to mobilize a large group of people and you will have [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] to add links to articles. Meantime, it is just silly to add them knowing that one of the many editors who abide by consensus will remove them again. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 23:38, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
265170 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-15 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.226782380E09 +++$+++ It is the opinion of a large number of editors and the consensus of which you speak only exits within a small pressure group. +++$+++ ::::It is the opinion of a large number of editors and the consensus of which you speak only exits within a small pressure group.[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 12:53, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
265171 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-15 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.226801220E09 +++$+++ Well, that remains to be seen, doesn't it? We shall see. Did you read any of those articles yet? -- +++$+++ :::::Well, that remains to be seen, doesn't it? We shall see. Did you read any of those articles yet? --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 18:07, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

612172 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612172 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-25 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.143321840E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for your productive \"mediation\". I am quite happy we are getting somewhere! Regards,  +++$+++ Thanks a lot for your productive "mediation". I am quite happy we are getting somewhere! Regards, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 13:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
612173 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612172 +++$+++ 612172 +++$+++ 2006-03-26 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.143408300E09 +++$+++ Nice of you to say so, though I've been rather too partisan to call it \"mediation\": constructive negotiation's probably better. As long as the article's improving, .. +++$+++ :Nice of you to say so, though I've been rather too partisan to call it "mediation": constructive negotiation's probably better. As long as the article's improving, ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 13:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

3019 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3019 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-08 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.307580960E09 +++$+++ Tim - is there some good reason why the title of the Shore article has \"(singer)\" after his name?  There is no other Andrew Shore anywhere in Wikipedia (see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&redirs=0&search=%22Andrew+Shore%22&fulltext=Search&ns0=1 here]), but perhaps you have another Andrew Shore up your sleeve?  If not, I'm rather inclined to move the article to [[Andrew Shore]].  Incidentally, if the real Andrew Shore eventually has to be disambiguated, the usual thing is to add \"(baritone)\" or \"(bass-baritone)\" rather than just \"(singer)\".  Best. --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ Tim - is there some good reason why the title of the Shore article has "(singer)" after his name?  There is no other Andrew Shore anywhere in Wikipedia (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&redirs=0&search=%22Andrew+Shore%22&fulltext=Search&ns0=1 here]), but perhaps you have another Andrew Shore up your sleeve?  If not, I'm rather inclined to move the article to [[Andrew Shore]].  Incidentally, if the real Andrew Shore eventually has to be disambiguated, the usual thing is to add "(baritone)" or "(bass-baritone)" rather than just "(singer)".  Best. --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 17:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
3020 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3019 +++$+++ 3019 +++$+++ 2011-06-08 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.307594220E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I moved him without any problems, as you can see above.  I can fill in a few more roles when I've got more time. --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ :Thanks. I moved him without any problems, as you can see above.  I can fill in a few more roles when I've got more time. --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 21:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

3021 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-09 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.307684880E09 +++$+++ Do your multifarious sources have any information on Phyllis Spurr, the pianist who accompanied Kathleen Ferrier at many of her recitals and recordings in the late 1940s and early 1950s? Unlike Gerald Moore, Phyllis seemingly shunned publicity; I can't find any references to her on the internet apart from her appearances in lists of performers. Nor can I find that she ever worked with anyone else but Ferrier; after the latter's death, Spurr seems to disappear completely from the concert and recording scene. If  any of your watchers have any useful information, perhaps they would note it on my talkpage. If enough can be gleaned I will do a short article.  +++$+++ Do your multifarious sources have any information on Phyllis Spurr, the pianist who accompanied Kathleen Ferrier at many of her recitals and recordings in the late 1940s and early 1950s? Unlike Gerald Moore, Phyllis seemingly shunned publicity; I can't find any references to her on the internet apart from her appearances in lists of performers. Nor can I find that she ever worked with anyone else but Ferrier; after the latter's death, Spurr seems to disappear completely from the concert and recording scene. If  any of your watchers have any useful information, perhaps they would note it on my talkpage. If enough can be gleaned I will do a short article. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 22:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
3022 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3021 +++$+++ 3021 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.307927040E09 +++$+++ I've checked out the Spurr material you unearthed. Probably not enough info for more than a brief stub, but I'll consider it. Thanks for your help.  +++$+++ :I've checked out the Spurr material you unearthed. Probably not enough info for more than a brief stub, but I'll consider it. Thanks for your help. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 18:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

3024 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.307927760E09 +++$+++ I have sent Ferrier to PR. It has been a surprisingly difficult article to write; I'd be grateful for any comments or suggestions for improvement. By the way, which is you in that photograph further up your talkpage?  +++$+++ I have sent Ferrier to PR. It has been a surprisingly difficult article to write; I'd be grateful for any comments or suggestions for improvement. By the way, which is you in that photograph further up your talkpage? [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 18:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
3025 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3024 +++$+++ 3024 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.307928480E09 +++$+++ Look for the smug old fart in a bow tie centre stage. Shall devote tomorrow to the Ferrier PR, though have been peeping during work-in-progress and know how good it is.  +++$+++ :Look for the smug old fart in a bow tie centre stage. Shall devote tomorrow to the Ferrier PR, though have been peeping during work-in-progress and know how good it is. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 18:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
3026 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3024 +++$+++ 3025 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.308003660E09 +++$+++ Well smug old fart or not, my wife thinks you're a bit of a dish (reminiscent of a slightly younger Colin Davis). Looking forward to your Ferrier comments; by the way, I've not been able to find a source which confirms the \"terrier\" pronunciation so I've left this alone.  +++$+++ ::Well smug old fart or not, my wife thinks you're a bit of a dish (reminiscent of a slightly younger Colin Davis). Looking forward to your Ferrier comments; by the way, I've not been able to find a source which confirms the "terrier" pronunciation so I've left this alone. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 15:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
3027 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3024 +++$+++ 3026 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.308006120E09 +++$+++ On ''Messiah'', would you look at [[User:Brianboulton\/Sandbox3|Messiah workpage]] where I have posted ideas about the article's structure and a possible division of labour.  +++$+++ :::On ''Messiah'', would you look at [[User:Brianboulton/Sandbox3|Messiah workpage]] where I have posted ideas about the article's structure and a possible division of labour. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 16:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

527314 +++$+++ Ethyr +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-05 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.267861920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ethyr|Ethyr]] ([[User talk:Ethyr|talk]]) 23:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
527315 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527314 +++$+++ 527314 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.268028240E09 +++$+++ The entry entitled \"Colonel James Sabow\" (created in February 2007); had one edit - a redirect to \"James E. Sabow\", which was deleted in February 2007 based on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/James E. Sabow (2nd nomination)|this AFD]]. The redirect page was deleted after the target article was deleted.  &mdash;  +++$+++ * The entry entitled "Colonel James Sabow" (created in February 2007); had one edit - a redirect to "James E. Sabow", which was deleted in February 2007 based on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James E. Sabow (2nd nomination)|this AFD]]. The redirect page was deleted after the target article was deleted.  &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 22:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

527316 +++$+++ Tedder +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527316 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-20 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.269074460E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}<\/code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 01:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
527317 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527316 +++$+++ 527316 +++$+++ 2005-12-05 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.133855400E09 +++$+++ Google is not God. While it can show some level of notability, I still haven't found which [[WP:MUSIC]] guidline it does meet. Show me which one, and I will accept it. - +++$+++ :Google is not God. While it can show some level of notability, I still haven't found which [[WP:MUSIC]] guidline it does meet. Show me which one, and I will accept it. -[[User:^demon|^demon]] 23:50, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
527318 +++$+++ Nagelfar +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527316 +++$+++ 527317 +++$+++ 2005-12-05 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.133855760E09 +++$+++ Look more closely next time, from [[WP:MUSIC]]; For performers outside of mass media traditions: 5. Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a particular sub-culture that is itself notable. Thats the main one, and this includes google.  +++$+++ ::Look more closely next time, from [[WP:MUSIC]]; For performers outside of mass media traditions: 5. Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a particular sub-culture that is itself notable. Thats the main one, and this includes google. [[User:Nagelfar|Nagelfar]] 23:56, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
527319 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527316 +++$+++ 527318 +++$+++ 2005-12-06 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.133905020E09 +++$+++ My mistake. AfD rescinded. - +++$+++ :::My mistake. AfD rescinded. -[[User:^demon|^demon]] 13:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
527320 +++$+++ Nagelfar +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527316 +++$+++ 527319 +++$+++ 2005-12-07 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.133956260E09 +++$+++ No problem, it ''was'' very vigilant of you. And such testing does keep me in check if I do go too far with adding other lesser known bands ;-P but I was more sure about this one; I've heard about the band for years & have never (to this day) heard any of their material. I've just been trying to fill out the 'big names' in the Japanese noise scene lately.  +++$+++ ::::No problem, it ''was'' very vigilant of you. And such testing does keep me in check if I do go too far with adding other lesser known bands ;-P but I was more sure about this one; I've heard about the band for years & have never (to this day) heard any of their material. I've just been trying to fill out the 'big names' in the Japanese noise scene lately. [[User:Nagelfar|Nagelfar]] 03:51, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

265174 +++$+++ Kusamanic +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265174 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.232881320E09 +++$+++ Hey, I could help in this article that [[English people]] want to include in brazil diapora but I did not know how to come out and get the numbers of referrals coming out next to each country, you can help me I'm new in the wiki thanks . saludos--[[User:Kusamanic|Kusamanic]] ([[User talk:Kusamanic|talk]]) 03:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)-- +++$+++ Hey, I could help in this article that [[English people]] want to include in brazil diapora but I did not know how to come out and get the numbers of referrals coming out next to each country, you can help me I'm new in the wiki thanks . saludos--[[User:Kusamanic|Kusamanic]] ([[User talk:Kusamanic|talk]]) 03:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)--[[User:Kusamanic|Kusamanic]] ([[User talk:Kusamanic|talk]]) 03:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
265175 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265174 +++$+++ 265174 +++$+++ 2009-01-27 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.233106980E09 +++$+++ You need to look for a Bazilian government cencus report that breaks down citizens by country of origin. I dont know if this data is gathered in Brazil. I suggest you use Google to look for ''Brazilian census England' .  This pointed me to the Brazilian IBGE which conducts the census for the government . You might find the information you want at their site , here  http:\/\/www.ibge.gov.br\/english\/default.php#divtema_populacao   .    +++$+++ :You need to look for a Bazilian government cencus report that breaks down citizens by country of origin. I dont know if this data is gathered in Brazil. I suggest you use Google to look for ''Brazilian census England' .  This pointed me to the Brazilian IBGE which conducts the census for the government . You might find the information you want at their site , here  http://www.ibge.gov.br/english/default.php#divtema_populacao   .   [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 17:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

3031 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-15 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.308191100E09 +++$+++ I have put a construction banner on the article and am posting stuff there.  +++$+++ I have put a construction banner on the article and am posting stuff there. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 19:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
3032 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3031 +++$+++ 3031 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.308350520E09 +++$+++ I have left some notes\/suggestions on the [[User:Brianboulton\/Sandbox3|the ''Messiah'' workpage]].  +++$+++ :I have left some notes/suggestions on the [[User:Brianboulton/Sandbox3|the ''Messiah'' workpage]]. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 15:42, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
3033 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3031 +++$+++ 3032 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.308534060E09 +++$+++ Alert! Ref 45 (gfhandel.org) - link not working at present.  +++$+++ ::Alert! Ref 45 (gfhandel.org) - link not working at present. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 18:41, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
3034 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3031 +++$+++ 3033 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.308535080E09 +++$+++ Blast! Frames, methinks. http:\/\/www.gfhandel.org\/ works to the main page but then one has to navigate to the chronology page from the left hand pane, and the URL doesn't change. I ''hate'' frames.  +++$+++ :::Blast! Frames, methinks. http://www.gfhandel.org/ works to the main page but then one has to navigate to the chronology page from the left hand pane, and the URL doesn't change. I ''hate'' frames. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 18:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
3035 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3031 +++$+++ 3034 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.308546780E09 +++$+++ ...and a couple more problems to turn the air blue: Ref 53 JSTOR link ain't working. Ref 62: I think you need to attribute your quote from \"The Harmonicon\" in the text (and say what it is - magazine, broadsheet or whatever), otherwise the reader will have no idea where it's coming from. I'll format the ref when you've done this. I must say I'm impressed with the scope and depth of your research; makes mine seem rather limited.  +++$+++ ::::...and a couple more problems to turn the air blue: Ref 53 JSTOR link ain't working. Ref 62: I think you need to attribute your quote from "The Harmonicon" in the text (and say what it is - magazine, broadsheet or whatever), otherwise the reader will have no idea where it's coming from. I'll format the ref when you've done this. I must say I'm impressed with the scope and depth of your research; makes mine seem rather limited. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 22:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
3036 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3031 +++$+++ 3035 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.308604440E09 +++$+++ Done. The first was my fault - a stray comma in the url. There was another broken link to the Handel.org site, which I've had to redirect to the site's front page, alas. Something has gone wrong with our refs 14 (no publication title shows) and 28 - unexpected screamer. But we progress!  +++$+++ :::::Done. The first was my fault - a stray comma in the url. There was another broken link to the Handel.org site, which I've had to redirect to the site's front page, alas. Something has gone wrong with our refs 14 (no publication title shows) and 28 - unexpected screamer. But we progress! [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 14:14, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
3037 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3031 +++$+++ 3036 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.308609720E09 +++$+++ 14 and 28 were my blunders, put right now. While I'm waiting for some more sources to help me with the music section (old Percy Young c. 1951 is surprisingly good, btw), I shall mainly be working in a sandbox on the subarticle list of movements (and attending to some reviewing duties ''and'' getting Ferrier ready for FAC if I can find the time). Thanks for the list of editions - looks like another subarticle in the making but we can decide later on that.  +++$+++ ::::::14 and 28 were my blunders, put right now. While I'm waiting for some more sources to help me with the music section (old Percy Young c. 1951 is surprisingly good, btw), I shall mainly be working in a sandbox on the subarticle list of movements (and attending to some reviewing duties ''and'' getting Ferrier ready for FAC if I can find the time). Thanks for the list of editions - looks like another subarticle in the making but we can decide later on that. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 15:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
3038 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3031 +++$+++ 3037 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.308954360E09 +++$+++ While working on the subarticle I have investigated the wikisource link in the \"Texts and structure\" section of the existing article. This is an Alladdin's cave of soundfiles, and includes the entire text. With this resource we don't need a subarticle for the list of movements. But I am not sure  that wikisource pages can be linked within an article in this way; I have always thought of them as external links. I am seeking advice from the ever-wise and all-knowing Ruhrfisch on this point, and also on the copyright status of the soundfiles. In the meantime I will suspend work on the subarticle. In any event I have a number of commitments this weekend which will affect the amount of work I can do on the article. Look out on my talkpage (or his) for Ruhrfisch's reply.  +++$+++ :::::::While working on the subarticle I have investigated the wikisource link in the "Texts and structure" section of the existing article. This is an Alladdin's cave of soundfiles, and includes the entire text. With this resource we don't need a subarticle for the list of movements. But I am not sure  that wikisource pages can be linked within an article in this way; I have always thought of them as external links. I am seeking advice from the ever-wise and all-knowing Ruhrfisch on this point, and also on the copyright status of the soundfiles. In the meantime I will suspend work on the subarticle. In any event I have a number of commitments this weekend which will affect the amount of work I can do on the article. Look out on my talkpage (or his) for Ruhrfisch's reply. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 15:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

265176 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265176 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-26 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.233015900E09 +++$+++ Hello. You say that locations are included in many film articles. I genuinely have not come across these, certainly not at GA or FA status. Would you mind pointing out a couple of examples where you have come across instances of these?  +++$+++ Hello. You say that locations are included in many film articles. I genuinely have not come across these, certainly not at GA or FA status. Would you mind pointing out a couple of examples where you have come across instances of these? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
265177 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265176 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-27 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.233106620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::  [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 17:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
265178 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265176 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.233179520E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Don't get me wrong, filming locations are important production details. However, they need to be written properly, in prose. [[Lost_(TV_series)#Filming_locations]] is an excellent example. Others you list are appalling and would not pass a GA or FA. We cannot justify including something in an article just because [[WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS|\"other stuff exists\"]]. As far as ''[[One Foot in the Grave]]'' is concerned, it is relevant information for a production section. You haven't given me an example of an article that uses a geolink, though.   +++$+++ :::Thanks. Don't get me wrong, filming locations are important production details. However, they need to be written properly, in prose. [[Lost_(TV_series)#Filming_locations]] is an excellent example. Others you list are appalling and would not pass a GA or FA. We cannot justify including something in an article just because [[WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS|"other stuff exists"]]. As far as ''[[One Foot in the Grave]]'' is concerned, it is relevant information for a production section. You haven't given me an example of an article that uses a geolink, though.  [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

527321 +++$+++ 23skidoo +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-06 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.133931300E09 +++$+++ I blocked Logoboy for creating hoax articles but I have not reported him as a vandal yet (though others might have). Please feel free to do so through the CVU. Looks like this guy is habitual from the number of blocks he has against him already. Cheers!   +++$+++ I blocked Logoboy for creating hoax articles but I have not reported him as a vandal yet (though others might have). Please feel free to do so through the CVU. Looks like this guy is habitual from the number of blocks he has against him already. Cheers!  [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 20:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
527322 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527321 +++$+++ 527321 +++$+++ 2005-12-07 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.134004860E09 +++$+++ I'm currently taking care of it now. - +++$+++ :I'm currently taking care of it now. -[[User:^demon|^demon]] 17:21, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

421090 +++$+++ Redvers +++$+++ Asbestos +++$+++ 421090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-29 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.151617200E09 +++$+++ This is all good. Honestly. And surprisingly well-thought-out. [[User_talk:Redvers|\u27a8 ]]<b><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ This is all good. Honestly. And surprisingly well-thought-out. [[User_talk:Redvers|➨ ]]<b><font color="red">[[User:Redvers|ЯEDVERS]]</font></b> 14:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
421091 +++$+++ Redvers +++$+++ Asbestos +++$+++ 421090 +++$+++ 421090 +++$+++ 2006-06-29 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.151621160E09 +++$+++ Fair point! I'll work on my wording a bit more. Thanks. [[User_talk:Redvers|\u27a8 ]]<b><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ :Fair point! I'll work on my wording a bit more. Thanks. [[User_talk:Redvers|➨ ]]<b><font color="red">[[User:Redvers|ЯEDVERS]]</font></b> 15:46, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

527323 +++$+++ Master of Puppets +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527323 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-07 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.134009540E09 +++$+++ Just wonderin', but is it necessary to post delete notes on articles such as [[Goth thug|this one]]? Or [[Service log|this one]]? They could be wikified, because they are not necessarily nonsense. -- +++$+++ Just wonderin', but is it necessary to post delete notes on articles such as [[Goth thug|this one]]? Or [[Service log|this one]]? They could be wikified, because they are not necessarily nonsense. --[[User:Master of Puppets| Master of Puppets]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Master of Puppets| (MASTER! MASTER!)]]</small></sup> 18:39, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
527324 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527323 +++$+++ 527323 +++$+++ 2005-12-07 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.134009660E09 +++$+++ I saw both of those as useless, non-salvagable material. I have been going on a delete frenzy today, so maybe I need to back off and take a break for a bit. - +++$+++ :I saw both of those as useless, non-salvagable material. I have been going on a delete frenzy today, so maybe I need to back off and take a break for a bit. -[[User:^demon|^demon]] 18:41, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
527325 +++$+++ Master of Puppets +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527323 +++$+++ 527324 +++$+++ 2005-12-07 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.134009720E09 +++$+++ My friend, you should see me on busy days. I'm just suggesting that you go a bit easier on some of those; for example, said [[Service record]] might be mergeable. But you're doing a fine job. -- +++$+++ ::My friend, you should see me on busy days. I'm just suggesting that you go a bit easier on some of those; for example, said [[Service record]] might be mergeable. But you're doing a fine job. --[[User:Master of Puppets| Master of Puppets]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Master of Puppets| (MASTER! MASTER!)]]</small></sup> 18:42, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

265181 +++$+++ Ikip +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-23 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.235444400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ikip|Ikip]] ([[User talk:Ikip|talk]]) 19:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
265182 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265181 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-23 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.235434920E09 +++$+++ I have joined. +++$+++ :::I have joined.[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 16:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
265183 +++$+++ Ikip +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265181 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-23 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.235444400E09 +++$+++ Great, welcome aboard! Any questions, please let me know. +++$+++ ::::Great, welcome aboard! Any questions, please let me know.[[User:Ikip|Ikip]] ([[User talk:Ikip|talk]]) 19:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

527326 +++$+++ Brendanconway +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-13 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.134540900E09 +++$+++ I don't think this article is for deletion. I've wikified it and removed the speedy delete tag.-- +++$+++ I don't think this article is for deletion. I've wikified it and removed the speedy delete tag.--[[User:Brendanconway|File Éireann]] 22:15, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
527327 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527326 +++$+++ 527326 +++$+++ 2005-12-16 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.134768300E09 +++$+++ Noted. I'm in the process of writing some proposals for overhauls on CSD, as I feel it's too restrictive. - +++$+++ :Noted. I'm in the process of writing some proposals for overhauls on CSD, as I feel it's too restrictive. -[[User:^demon|^demon]] 13:25, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

3040 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-16 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.308285660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note.  I've just been catching up on email and WP watchlist stuff after a trip to Sussex for (ahem!) ''Meistersinger''.  I realised as we passed the turn for Folkington that I'd forgotten my camera and would be unable to take a picture of ED's grave - aargh!  I'll see if a friend of mine who lives in Lewes can do the necessary.  Anyway, I'm busy tomorrow, but promise to have a look at all those articles over the weekend.  I'm rather a slow worker myself, but I do admire your industry! Best. --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ Thanks for the note.  I've just been catching up on email and WP watchlist stuff after a trip to Sussex for (ahem!) ''Meistersinger''.  I realised as we passed the turn for Folkington that I'd forgotten my camera and would be unable to take a picture of ED's grave - aargh!  I'll see if a friend of mine who lives in Lewes can do the necessary.  Anyway, I'm busy tomorrow, but promise to have a look at all those articles over the weekend.  I'm rather a slow worker myself, but I do admire your industry! Best. --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 21:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
3041 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3040 +++$+++ 3040 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.308445140E09 +++$+++ --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ *--<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 17:59, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
3042 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3040 +++$+++ 3041 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 06:38:00 +++$+++ 1.308490680E09 +++$+++ Warmest thanks for these. I've amended as suggested. The article is now at FAC, by the bye.  +++$+++ **Warmest thanks for these. I've amended as suggested. The article is now at FAC, by the bye. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 06:38, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

527329 +++$+++ Adashiel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527329 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-20 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.137796620E09 +++$+++ Since the block would have expired in a few hours anyway, I have removed the block on 208.0.239.54. As you can see from [[Special:Contributions\/208.0.239.54]], there has been quite a bit of mischief coming from this address over the last couple days, which is the reason behind the block.  Hopefully those responsible have found something else to do and won't force us to block the address again.  \u2013 +++$+++ Since the block would have expired in a few hours anyway, I have removed the block on 208.0.239.54. As you can see from [[Special:Contributions/208.0.239.54]], there has been quite a bit of mischief coming from this address over the last couple days, which is the reason behind the block.  Hopefully those responsible have found something else to do and won't force us to block the address again.  –[[User:Adashiel|Abe Dashiell]] <sup>'''([[User_talk:Adashiel|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Adashiel|c]])'''</sup> 14:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
527330 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527329 +++$+++ 527329 +++$+++ 2006-01-20 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.137796800E09 +++$+++ Ok. I'll take a look at that and forward it on to our sysadmin and see if he can do anything about it. Thanks for taking care of this for me. -- +++$+++ :Ok. I'll take a look at that and forward it on to our sysadmin and see if he can do anything about it. Thanks for taking care of this for me. --[[User:^demon|^demon]] 14:40, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

3044 +++$+++ Cassianto +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.308525120E09 +++$+++ Many thanks Tim. I have also touched upon Leslie Henson and Billy Bennett. Could you check these to see if what I have done is ok. All the best  +++$+++ Many thanks Tim. I have also touched upon Leslie Henson and Billy Bennett. Could you check these to see if what I have done is ok. All the best [[User:Cassianto|Cassianto]] ([[User talk:Cassianto|talk]]) 16:12, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
3045 +++$+++ Cassianto +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3044 +++$+++ 3044 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.308547080E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim Yes I would certainly be interested in helping out on the Billy Bennett article. I have heard of most music hall performers and find the subject fascinating. I created the Mark Sheridan article a few months back and do what I can on it with the research I have done. Who was your ancestor?  +++$+++ : Hi Tim Yes I would certainly be interested in helping out on the Billy Bennett article. I have heard of most music hall performers and find the subject fascinating. I created the Mark Sheridan article a few months back and do what I can on it with the research I have done. Who was your ancestor? [[User:Cassianto|Cassianto]] ([[User talk:Cassianto|talk]]) 22:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

3046 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-21 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.308690060E09 +++$+++ Wehwalt found a cartoon on page 387 of [http:\/\/www.archive.org\/stream\/caricaturehistor02benguoft#page\/386\/mode\/1up this source], that satirizes ''Patience''.  The ''Patience'' article, however, is pretty full of images, so I don't think we need this until, perhaps, we expand Patience and have more room for images.  There are also a couple of other images there satirizing ''Pinafore'', but they may require too much setup.  Do you think the image quality is crisp enough to use, or should we forget about this as being \"interesting, but not necessary\"?   --  +++$+++ Wehwalt found a cartoon on page 387 of [http://www.archive.org/stream/caricaturehistor02benguoft#page/386/mode/1up this source], that satirizes ''Patience''.  The ''Patience'' article, however, is pretty full of images, so I don't think we need this until, perhaps, we expand Patience and have more room for images.  There are also a couple of other images there satirizing ''Pinafore'', but they may require too much setup.  Do you think the image quality is crisp enough to use, or should we forget about this as being "interesting, but not necessary"?   -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 14:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
3047 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3046 +++$+++ 3046 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.308695520E09 +++$+++ What I like about this image (which, by the bye, I can easily clean up) is that it uses ''Patience'' to satirise local notables, and the cartoonist has felt confident in assuming that his audience would immediately get the allusion. In short, it illustrates the extent to which G&S had become common currency. Well worth salting away, I think, for use when we expand the article.  +++$+++ :What I like about this image (which, by the bye, I can easily clean up) is that it uses ''Patience'' to satirise local notables, and the cartoonist has felt confident in assuming that his audience would immediately get the allusion. In short, it illustrates the extent to which G&S had become common currency. Well worth salting away, I think, for use when we expand the article. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 15:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
3048 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3046 +++$+++ 3047 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.308698700E09 +++$+++ Excellent.  If you can think of any other G&S articles where this image (or the Pinafore ones) ought to be added sooner, then please do go ahead with the cleanup and uploading when you can.  Happy editing!  --  +++$+++ ::Excellent.  If you can think of any other G&S articles where this image (or the Pinafore ones) ought to be added sooner, then please do go ahead with the cleanup and uploading when you can.  Happy editing!  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 16:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

265192 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-05 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.244224380E09 +++$+++ The truth or otherwise of McKennas theory is not relevant to Wikipedia. It remains a significant  cultural artifact of some influence and noteworthiness. Wikipedia does not include articles based on their scientific truth but on their notability.  Many independant published authors have noted , referred to or built on this  concept. Mckenna's impact with the Novelty theory  concept is big enough and its notability is proven in the discussions. You failed to get a consensus to delete . Merger is deletion by the back door. You yourself said you would wait a few days (4th June) before progressing. You are being precipitate and stifling debate to push this through.  +++$+++ The truth or otherwise of McKennas theory is not relevant to Wikipedia. It remains a significant  cultural artifact of some influence and noteworthiness. Wikipedia does not include articles based on their scientific truth but on their notability.  Many independant published authors have noted , referred to or built on this  concept. Mckenna's impact with the Novelty theory  concept is big enough and its notability is proven in the discussions. You failed to get a consensus to delete . Merger is deletion by the back door. You yourself said you would wait a few days (4th June) before progressing. You are being precipitate and stifling debate to push this through. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 10:53, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
265193 +++$+++  Serendipodous +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265192 +++$+++ 265192 +++$+++ 2009-06-05 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.244224740E09 +++$+++ I never wanted to delete this article. '''You''' demanded an AfD. '''I''' asked for the AfD to be closed when they pointed out to me that AfDs are not forums for discussing mergers. Mergers are discussed on article talk pages. I know I said that I would leave it open for a few more days but all that happened in the following 24 hours was that someone else voted to merge. It seemed valid to conclude the merge as per [[WP:SNOWBALL]]. So far, the only person who has objected to this merge is you. Right now, the merged article contains almost all the information in the separate article. Unless you can double the article's length (with sourced, independent information that isn't just \"McKenna said this\" or \"McKenna said that\", there isn't much case for it to be kept. <b> +++$+++ :I never wanted to delete this article. '''You''' demanded an AfD. '''I''' asked for the AfD to be closed when they pointed out to me that AfDs are not forums for discussing mergers. Mergers are discussed on article talk pages. I know I said that I would leave it open for a few more days but all that happened in the following 24 hours was that someone else voted to merge. It seemed valid to conclude the merge as per [[WP:SNOWBALL]]. So far, the only person who has objected to this merge is you. Right now, the merged article contains almost all the information in the separate article. Unless you can double the article's length (with sourced, independent information that isn't just "McKenna said this" or "McKenna said that", there isn't much case for it to be kept. <b>[[User:Serendipodous|<font color="#00b">Serendi</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Serendipodous|<sup><font color="#b00">pod</font></sup>]]<font color="#00b">[[User talk: Serendipodous|ous]]</font></b> 10:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

3052 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3052 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-25 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.309051380E09 +++$+++ Great article! But America, to my understanding, means more than the United States, I wonder if that might be reflected in the title but don't know how? -- +++$+++ Great article! But America, to my understanding, means more than the United States, I wonder if that might be reflected in the title but don't know how? --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 18:23, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
3053 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3052 +++$+++ 3052 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.309051680E09 +++$+++ Thank you! It was very nearly all-US, but there was a detour to Cuba and another to Canada. \"The West Indies and North America\" is a bit of a mouthful, perhaps, and I thought just \"America\" would cover the two extraterritorial excursions without making too much of the point.  +++$+++ :Thank you! It was very nearly all-US, but there was a detour to Cuba and another to Canada. "The West Indies and North America" is a bit of a mouthful, perhaps, and I thought just "America" would cover the two extraterritorial excursions without making too much of the point. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 18:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
3054 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3052 +++$+++ 3053 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.309054740E09 +++$+++ Got it, thank you! -- +++$+++ ::Got it, thank you! --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 19:19, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

541302 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-14 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.237077180E09 +++$+++ Thanks!   +++$+++ Thanks!  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 17:33, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
541303 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541302 +++$+++ 541302 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.237341480E09 +++$+++ But none of these people met with a public figure, who issued a press statement following the meeting.   +++$+++ :But none of these people met with a public figure, who issued a press statement following the meeting.  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 18:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

527342 +++$+++ Porco-esphino +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527342 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-16 07:48:00 +++$+++ 1.145198880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Porco-esphino|Porco-esphino]] 07:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
527343 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527342 +++$+++ 527342 +++$+++ 2006-04-16 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.145228640E09 +++$+++ I'm not exactly quite sure what you mean by this. I know you can modify the monobook.css file for all users (if you are the admin for it), or for individual users (through User:User\/monobook.css). Does this help? - +++$+++ :I'm not exactly quite sure what you mean by this. I know you can modify the monobook.css file for all users (if you are the admin for it), or for individual users (through User:User/monobook.css). Does this help? -[[User:^demon|^demon]] 16:04, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

3056 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-26 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.309135560E09 +++$+++ When you have a moment, could you visit the Messiah sandbox and comment on my latest thoughts on subarticles etc?  +++$+++ When you have a moment, could you visit the Messiah sandbox and comment on my latest thoughts on subarticles etc? [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 17:46, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
3057 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3056 +++$+++ 3056 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.309622580E09 +++$+++ Time for another check! I've left a progress report in the sandbox.  +++$+++ :Time for another check! I've left a progress report in the sandbox. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 09:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
3058 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3056 +++$+++ 3057 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.309930800E09 +++$+++ Please can you check in on the work page? The article is pretty well stalled at present and urgently needs your input.  +++$+++ ::Please can you check in on the work page? The article is pretty well stalled at present and urgently needs your input. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 22:40, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

265201 +++$+++ Cailil +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-11 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.244780160E09 +++$+++ Just FYI Lumos3, something very weird happened [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Universality_of_patriarchy&diff=prev&oldid=295850202 with last comment on the above AFD].  I'm assuming this was unintentional and fixed it myself - please check other edits in case its happened again.  Do you have a new automated script running or anything else that might have caused this?-- +++$+++ Just FYI Lumos3, something very weird happened [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Universality_of_patriarchy&diff=prev&oldid=295850202 with last comment on the above AFD].  I'm assuming this was unintentional and fixed it myself - please check other edits in case its happened again.  Do you have a new automated script running or anything else that might have caused this?--[[User:Cailil|<font color="#999999" size="2">'''Cailil'''</font>]]  <sup>[[User_talk:Cailil|<font color="#999999">'''talk'''</font>]]</sup> 21:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
265202 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265201 +++$+++ 265201 +++$+++ 2009-06-11 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.244786640E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I think it was something to do with the Google tool bar spell checker. +++$+++ :Thanks, I think it was something to do with the Google tool bar spell checker.[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 23:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

527346 +++$+++ Porco-esphino +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-18 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.145388900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Porco-esphino|Porco-esphino]] 12:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
527347 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527346 +++$+++ 527346 +++$+++ 2006-04-18 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.145403600E09 +++$+++ I mean normal templates, like <nowiki>{{cite}}<\/nowiki> or <nowiki>{{db-nonsense}}<\/nowiki>. I *think* there's a way to transclude normal page (like this one). But I can't remember how. If you put the CSS classes within a template, and included it, it might work. Lemmie play with some stuff and I can tell you later. -- +++$+++ :I mean normal templates, like <nowiki>{{cite}}</nowiki> or <nowiki>{{db-nonsense}}</nowiki>. I *think* there's a way to transclude normal page (like this one). But I can't remember how. If you put the CSS classes within a template, and included it, it might work. Lemmie play with some stuff and I can tell you later. --[[User:^demon|^demon]] 16:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

3060 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3060 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-27 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.309211040E09 +++$+++ Just saw that ENO got its [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/English_National_Opera\/archive1&curid=32128392&diff=436505498&oldid=436505429 well-deserved star]. Congrats!  +++$+++ Just saw that ENO got its [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/English_National_Opera/archive1&curid=32128392&diff=436505498&oldid=436505429 well-deserved star]. Congrats! [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 14:44, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
3061 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3060 +++$+++ 3060 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.309214280E09 +++$+++ Oh, I get by with <s>a little<\/s> ''considerable'' help from my friends!  +++$+++ :Oh, I get by with <s>a little</s> ''considerable'' help from my friends! [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 15:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
3062 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3060 +++$+++ 3061 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.309714140E09 +++$+++ I should have added my congrats, too - excellent stuff.  Changing the subject very slightly, I've just been looking at [[Carl Rosa Opera]] and there seems to be a discrepancy between that article and [[English National Opera]].  The ENO article says that CRO was wound up in 1958, whereas the CRO article says 1960.  Harold Rosenthal in the Grove Opera article on CRO says that at the end of 1958 Sadler's Wells  \"took over same of the company's personnel and the short-lived \"Touring Opera 1958\" was formed. The 1960 CRO season at the Prince's Theatre was promoted by the Carl Rosa Trust but, as both Rosenthal and the CRO article say, \"the company's existence came to an end with the performance of ''Don Giovanni'' on 17 September 1960. A bit of adjustment in the ENO article seems called for, perhaps?  Also, the CRO article says that \"the general director, manager and musical director\" of SW resigned in '58.  The musical director was Gibson, but did \"Tucker [and] his deputy Stephen Arlen\" have the titles \"general director\" and \"manager\"?  Rosenthal says that Arlen was appointed general manager of SWO in 1951, and then administrative director ... in 1966 he was appointed managing director (wonder what the differences were, if any?).   Sorry if all this is a bit nit-picky.  (On the other hand, if you wish to arrange pistols at dawn with [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]], I could volunteer to be the umpire.) Best. --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ ::I should have added my congrats, too - excellent stuff.  Changing the subject very slightly, I've just been looking at [[Carl Rosa Opera]] and there seems to be a discrepancy between that article and [[English National Opera]].  The ENO article says that CRO was wound up in 1958, whereas the CRO article says 1960.  Harold Rosenthal in the Grove Opera article on CRO says that at the end of 1958 Sadler's Wells  "took over same of the company's personnel and the short-lived "Touring Opera 1958" was formed. The 1960 CRO season at the Prince's Theatre was promoted by the Carl Rosa Trust but, as both Rosenthal and the CRO article say, "the company's existence came to an end with the performance of ''Don Giovanni'' on 17 September 1960. A bit of adjustment in the ENO article seems called for, perhaps?  Also, the CRO article says that "the general director, manager and musical director" of SW resigned in '58.  The musical director was Gibson, but did "Tucker [and] his deputy Stephen Arlen" have the titles "general director" and "manager"?  Rosenthal says that Arlen was appointed general manager of SWO in 1951, and then administrative director ... in 1966 he was appointed managing director (wonder what the differences were, if any?).   Sorry if all this is a bit nit-picky.  (On the other hand, if you wish to arrange pistols at dawn with [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]], I could volunteer to be the umpire.) Best. --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 10:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
3063 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3060 +++$+++ 3062 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.309748100E09 +++$+++ Your congrats are most gratefully received. I shall check out the Carl Rosa\/Sadler's Wells points you make above (which are decidedly to the point - thank you!). If memory serves, I perpetrated most of the Carl Rosa Company article as well as of the ENO one, but in any case I am pretty confident that my Wikipedia guardian angel (a.k.a. Ssilvers) does not keep loaded firearms in the house.  +++$+++ :::Your congrats are most gratefully received. I shall check out the Carl Rosa/Sadler's Wells points you make above (which are decidedly to the point - thank you!). If memory serves, I perpetrated most of the Carl Rosa Company article as well as of the ENO one, but in any case I am pretty confident that my Wikipedia guardian angel (a.k.a. Ssilvers) does not keep loaded firearms in the house. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 19:55, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
3064 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3060 +++$+++ 3063 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.309859820E09 +++$+++ Quite right.  It's not the ball I mind; it's the bang!  And with swords, it's not the blade I mind, it's the blood.... --  +++$+++ ::::Quite right.  It's not the ball I mind; it's the bang!  And with swords, it's not the blade I mind, it's the blood.... -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 02:57, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
3065 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3060 +++$+++ 3064 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311868920E09 +++$+++ The Carl Rosa company article and the ENO one are now singing from the same vocal score.  +++$+++ :::::The Carl Rosa company article and the ENO one are now singing from the same vocal score. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 09:02, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
3066 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3060 +++$+++ 3065 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 10:33:00 +++$+++ 1.311874380E09 +++$+++ Glad to hear it.  Must get on to the Offenbach PR this p.m. --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ ::::::Glad to hear it.  Must get on to the Offenbach PR this p.m. --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 10:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

265206 +++$+++  Serendipodous +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-15 11:13:00 +++$+++ 1.245089580E09 +++$+++ You want this article, you maintain it. So far, you've not kept up your side of the bargain. If you are not willing to take the time to keep people like Systemizer at bay then you've proven that this article cannot exist on its own. <b> +++$+++ You want this article, you maintain it. So far, you've not kept up your side of the bargain. If you are not willing to take the time to keep people like Systemizer at bay then you've proven that this article cannot exist on its own. <b>[[User:Serendipodous|<font color="#00b">Serendi</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Serendipodous|<sup><font color="#b00">pod</font></sup>]]<font color="#00b">[[User talk: Serendipodous|ous]]</font></b> 11:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
265207 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265206 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-15 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.245091080E09 +++$+++ Any assistance is welcome. +++$+++ ::Any assistance is welcome.[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 11:38, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
265208 +++$+++  Serendipodous +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265206 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-15 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.245106860E09 +++$+++ Nice to see you back. :-) Like I said, I'll be keeping an eye on this but, as I know little about Timewave myself, my contributions will mostly consist of reverting the more hyperbolic additions of people like Systemizer. <b> +++$+++ :::Nice to see you back. :-) Like I said, I'll be keeping an eye on this but, as I know little about Timewave myself, my contributions will mostly consist of reverting the more hyperbolic additions of people like Systemizer. <b>[[User:Serendipodous|<font color="#00b">Serendi</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Serendipodous|<sup><font color="#b00">pod</font></sup>]]<font color="#00b">[[User talk: Serendipodous|ous]]</font></b> 16:01, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

527352 +++$+++ Stollery +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527352 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-16 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.147835160E09 +++$+++ VP runs thru IE so try logging in thru IE before you start the program (make sure you have cookies '''enabled''') - see how that goes - '''''[[User:Stollery|Gl]][[User:Stollery\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]][[User:Stollery|<font color=\"red\">n<\/font>]]''''' ''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Stollery|T]]<\/sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions\/Stollery|C]]<\/sub>  +++$+++ VP runs thru IE so try logging in thru IE before you start the program (make sure you have cookies '''enabled''') - see how that goes - '''''[[User:Stollery|Gl]][[User:Stollery/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Stollery|<font color="red">n</font>]]''''' ''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Stollery|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Stollery|C]]</sub> [[User:Stollery|(Stollery)]]</small>'' 20:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
527353 +++$+++ Stollery +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527352 +++$+++ 527352 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.147837080E09 +++$+++ Sorry I completely missed your latest message! So, when you booted it up initially it asked you for your login name? - '''''[[User:Stollery|Gl]][[User:Stollery\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]][[User:Stollery|<font color=\"red\">n<\/font>]]''''' ''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Stollery|T]]<\/sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions\/Stollery|C]]<\/sub>  +++$+++ :Sorry I completely missed your latest message! So, when you booted it up initially it asked you for your login name? - '''''[[User:Stollery|Gl]][[User:Stollery/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Stollery|<font color="red">n</font>]]''''' ''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Stollery|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Stollery|C]]</sub> [[User:Stollery|(Stollery)]]</small>'' 20:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

265210 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-19 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.250737620E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure what it means on your user page where you write \"I agree to multi-license. all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below.\". [[WP:UP]] makes it clear that your user space pages belong to the community and are covered by our licences. Have you just forgotten that was there? Thanks.  +++$+++ I'm not sure what it means on your user page where you write "I agree to multi-license. all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below.". [[WP:UP]] makes it clear that your user space pages belong to the community and are covered by our licences. Have you just forgotten that was there? Thanks. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 20:07, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
265211 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265210 +++$+++ 265210 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.250738700E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing]]. This statement is intended to add add additional freedom of use to any work I do on Wikipedia .  My userpages are only covered by the  Creative Commons Attribution\/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA). I have added a more recent banner to make this clearer. Thanks for drawing it to my attention.  +++$+++ :See [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing]]. This statement is intended to add add additional freedom of use to any work I do on Wikipedia .  My userpages are only covered by the  Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA). I have added a more recent banner to make this clearer. Thanks for drawing it to my attention. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 20:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
265212 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265210 +++$+++ 265211 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.250740560E09 +++$+++ I just stumbled across yours, but there are a shedload of people with out-of-date statements, so I'm discussing how they can be notified. No big deal hopefully for anyone, but you never know.  +++$+++ ::I just stumbled across yours, but there are a shedload of people with out-of-date statements, so I'm discussing how they can be notified. No big deal hopefully for anyone, but you never know. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 20:56, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
265213 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265210 +++$+++ 265211 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.251562500E09 +++$+++ I have seen no evidence from a reliable source that Badoo is spamming.  The individual comments at the Mcaffee site do not fall within Wikipedia's guidelines on notability. The fact that McAffeeitself gives it a clean bill is reliable. You assert there is evidence but I've yet to see any. Please add it to the article. Guidelines on what qualifies as a reliable source can be found here [[WP:RELIABLE]], basically scholarly works , or editorially published books, or reliable news source with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. .  +++$+++ ::I have seen no evidence from a reliable source that Badoo is spamming.  The individual comments at the Mcaffee site do not fall within Wikipedia's guidelines on notability. The fact that McAffeeitself gives it a clean bill is reliable. You assert there is evidence but I've yet to see any. Please add it to the article. Guidelines on what qualifies as a reliable source can be found here [[WP:RELIABLE]], basically scholarly works , or editorially published books, or reliable news source with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. . [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 09:15, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

3068 +++$+++ Jezhotwells +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3068 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.309869060E09 +++$+++ The delegate says a spotcheck for compliance with WP:V and close paraphrasing is needed for all nominators. Would appreciate it if you could take a look. Cheers.  +++$+++ The delegate says a spotcheck for compliance with WP:V and close paraphrasing is needed for all nominators. Would appreciate it if you could take a look. Cheers. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 05:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
3069 +++$+++ Jezhotwells +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3068 +++$+++ 3068 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.309944180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your offer. I hope someone responds soon.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your offer. I hope someone responds soon. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 02:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
3070 +++$+++ Jezhotwells +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3068 +++$+++ 3069 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.310084460E09 +++$+++ Sandy has said yes.  +++$+++ ::Sandy has said yes. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 17:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

44202 +++$+++ Tim PF +++$+++ Pencefn +++$+++ 44202 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-17 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.308371160E09 +++$+++ Anyway, all that is original research. I'll watch this page for a while, should you wish to reply.  +++$+++ Anyway, all that is original research. I'll watch this page for a while, should you wish to reply. [[User:Tim PF|Tim PF]] ([[User talk:Tim PF|talk]]) 21:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
44203 +++$+++ Tim PF +++$+++ Pencefn +++$+++ 44202 +++$+++ 44202 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.309450860E09 +++$+++ It looks like I may not have been wrong after all. I checked the [[:Airdrie-Bathgate Rail Link]] and its sources (such as [http:\/\/www.networkrail.co.uk\/aspx\/10735.aspx Network Rail]), and it only specifies electrification of the line between Drumgelloch and Haymarket.  I have therefore reinstated my change.  +++$+++ : It looks like I may not have been wrong after all. I checked the [[:Airdrie-Bathgate Rail Link]] and its sources (such as [http://www.networkrail.co.uk/aspx/10735.aspx Network Rail]), and it only specifies electrification of the line between Drumgelloch and Haymarket.  I have therefore reinstated my change. [[User:Tim PF|Tim PF]] ([[User talk:Tim PF|talk]]) 09:21, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
44204 +++$+++ Pencefn +++$+++ Pencefn +++$+++ 44202 +++$+++ 44203 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.309475340E09 +++$+++ Last time I went through Haymarket station the north tunnels were electrified (early Jaunary 2011). I will try to get across that way at the weekend to get some photographs. -- +++$+++ ::Last time I went through Haymarket station the north tunnels were electrified (early Jaunary 2011). I will try to get across that way at the weekend to get some photographs. --[[User:Pencefn|Stewart]]<small><font color="maroon"><sup> '''([[User talk:Pencefn#top|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Pencefn|edits]])'''</sup></font></small> 16:09, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
44205 +++$+++ Pencefn +++$+++ Pencefn +++$+++ 44202 +++$+++ 44203 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309640040E09 +++$+++ Images now uploaded and the Haymarket article amended. -- +++$+++ ::Images now uploaded and the Haymarket article amended. --[[User:Pencefn|Stewart]]<small><font color="maroon"><sup> '''([[User talk:Pencefn#top|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Pencefn|edits]])'''</sup></font></small> 13:54, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

612181 +++$+++ Mais oui! +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-07 09:56:00 +++$+++ 1.144428960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. -- +++$+++ Thanks. --[[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] 09:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
612182 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612181 +++$+++ 612181 +++$+++ 2006-04-07 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.144450140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the information, it seems to be getting sorted out ok. .. +++$+++ :Thanks for the information, it seems to be getting sorted out ok. ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:49, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

265218 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-04 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.252098000E09 +++$+++ Your reasoning is exactly along the lines I would have suggested so go ahead and do the merger. Best Wishes    +++$+++ Your reasoning is exactly along the lines I would have suggested so go ahead and do the merger. Best Wishes   [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 14:00, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
265219 +++$+++ Ikip +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265218 +++$+++ 265218 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.252979160E09 +++$+++ last I checked the redirect went through, I am sorry to see that. Please let me know if you need any help. Thanks.  +++$+++ :last I checked the redirect went through, I am sorry to see that. Please let me know if you need any help. Thanks. [[User:Ikip|Ikip]] ([[User talk:Ikip|talk]]) 18:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

87894 +++$+++ CarTick +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-23 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.303590960E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:India#India_that_is_Bharat] based on the discussion that is taking place in India page, I would like to take the opportunity to warn you not to label everyone that disagrees with you as \"Hindu nationalist\". it is apparent from your comments in various talk pages that you do not care so much about \"Hinduism\" and have some kind of <s>hatred<\/s> disdain for the religion. i understand that it is your right to like or dislike something. but, please do not use India page as a platform to <s>spew your hatred<\/s> express your condescension towards Hinduism or any other. i also warn you not to accuse every new user of a sockpuppet of someone as a strategy to weaken, discourage and discredit them. you really need to stop. -- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:India#India_that_is_Bharat] based on the discussion that is taking place in India page, I would like to take the opportunity to warn you not to label everyone that disagrees with you as "Hindu nationalist". it is apparent from your comments in various talk pages that you do not care so much about "Hinduism" and have some kind of <s>hatred</s> disdain for the religion. i understand that it is your right to like or dislike something. but, please do not use India page as a platform to <s>spew your hatred</s> express your condescension towards Hinduism or any other. i also warn you not to accuse every new user of a sockpuppet of someone as a strategy to weaken, discourage and discredit them. you really need to stop. --[[User:CarTick|CarTick]] ([[User talk:CarTick|talk]]) 13:36, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
87895 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87894 +++$+++ 87894 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.303591620E09 +++$+++ Hindu nationalism is not a curse word.  I am happy to provide perfectly reliable sources for the RSS being a Hindu nationalist organization, an extreme one at that.   I regard your unwarranted musings, \"do not care so much about \"Hinduism\" and has some kind of hatred for the religion. i understand that it is your right to like or dislike something. but, please do not use India page as a platform to spew your hatred on Hinduism or any other,\" to be much more in violation of Wikipedia policy than my characterizing someone edits as Hindu-nationalism-related.  I have not called the editor in question a Hindu nationalist.  You, on the other hand, have posited my hatred for the Hindu religion, for which you have no hard proof, not even for my Wikipedia output.   +++$+++ :Hindu nationalism is not a curse word.  I am happy to provide perfectly reliable sources for the RSS being a Hindu nationalist organization, an extreme one at that.   I regard your unwarranted musings, "do not care so much about "Hinduism" and has some kind of hatred for the religion. i understand that it is your right to like or dislike something. but, please do not use India page as a platform to spew your hatred on Hinduism or any other," to be much more in violation of Wikipedia policy than my characterizing someone edits as Hindu-nationalism-related.  I have not called the editor in question a Hindu nationalist.  You, on the other hand, have posited my hatred for the Hindu religion, for which you have no hard proof, not even for my Wikipedia output.  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 13:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
87896 +++$+++ CarTick +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87894 +++$+++ 87895 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.303592100E09 +++$+++ you have never said you dislike Hinduism, but it comes across as you do dislike their belief and practices. i have seen that in many occasions. here is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Ganges&diff=424945543&oldid=424944546 the most recent]. '''Quote from your comment:''' ''The Bangladeshis don't revere the river (being mostly Muslims), and, consequently, and paradoxically, to their credit, they don't abuse it as much.'' -- +++$+++ ::you have never said you dislike Hinduism, but it comes across as you do dislike their belief and practices. i have seen that in many occasions. here is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ganges&diff=424945543&oldid=424944546 the most recent]. '''Quote from your comment:''' ''The Bangladeshis don't revere the river (being mostly Muslims), and, consequently, and paradoxically, to their credit, they don't abuse it as much.'' --[[User:CarTick|CarTick]] ([[User talk:CarTick|talk]]) 13:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
87897 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87894 +++$+++ 87896 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.303592640E09 +++$+++ I have certainly not said that, but you ''have'', most recently, \"some kind of hatred for the religion. i understand that it is your right to like or dislike something. but, please do not use India page as a platform to spew your hatred on Hinduism.\"  What hatred?  What is wrong with that Bangladesh statement?  It's not my problem that Indian editors are getting defensive.  They need to be objective.  I believe the Bangladesh statement to be substantially true.  While people who live along the banks of the river in Bangladesh do defecate there as well, half of Bangladesh doesn't turn up annually to do the same.  The Ganges is a tired river.  No point filling the article up with nationalistic chest thumping.  How will that help anyone?   +++$+++ :::I have certainly not said that, but you ''have'', most recently, "some kind of hatred for the religion. i understand that it is your right to like or dislike something. but, please do not use India page as a platform to spew your hatred on Hinduism."  What hatred?  What is wrong with that Bangladesh statement?  It's not my problem that Indian editors are getting defensive.  They need to be objective.  I believe the Bangladesh statement to be substantially true.  While people who live along the banks of the river in Bangladesh do defecate there as well, half of Bangladesh doesn't turn up annually to do the same.  The Ganges is a tired river.  No point filling the article up with nationalistic chest thumping.  How will that help anyone?  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 14:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
87898 +++$+++ Thisthat2011 +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87894 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.303593240E09 +++$+++ The connection of how Hindus abuse rivers because of religion and not Bangladeshis do not because of religion is somehow ignoring the fact that Hindus do not abuse a river by any belief which it appears to say because of the words \"consequently, and paradoxically\" and in fact, the river is sacred to Hindus. The statement above ignores the fact that Hindus do turn up for certain Hindu rituals, and not to as mentioned defecate as an aim which is made quite apparent. To ignore Hindu understanding and practice is one thing, but after ignoring it commenting on all other aspects and passing it as a Hindu understanding and practice is quite a mischief I think. But this is my 2 cents. +++$+++ ::::: The connection of how Hindus abuse rivers because of religion and not Bangladeshis do not because of religion is somehow ignoring the fact that Hindus do not abuse a river by any belief which it appears to say because of the words "consequently, and paradoxically" and in fact, the river is sacred to Hindus. The statement above ignores the fact that Hindus do turn up for certain Hindu rituals, and not to as mentioned defecate as an aim which is made quite apparent. To ignore Hindu understanding and practice is one thing, but after ignoring it commenting on all other aspects and passing it as a Hindu understanding and practice is quite a mischief I think. But this is my 2 cents.[[User:Thisthat2011|Thisthat2011]] ([[User talk:Thisthat2011|talk]]) 14:14, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
87899 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87894 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.303593660E09 +++$+++ If Hindu practice results in the deaths of thousands of individuals, as it does in this case, through water borne diseases, why should I \"understand\" why Hindus cause these deaths.  Concern for human life is more important than cultural relativist kowtowing to a religion.   +++$+++ :::::::If Hindu practice results in the deaths of thousands of individuals, as it does in this case, through water borne diseases, why should I "understand" why Hindus cause these deaths.  Concern for human life is more important than cultural relativist kowtowing to a religion.  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 14:21, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
87900 +++$+++ Thisthat2011 +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87894 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.303596240E09 +++$+++ Please remember to apply the same yardstick to to all religions practices that do not affect believers and non believers, like why should people inflict themselves pain in the name of religion knowingly. I am sure then that you are averse to calling non believers as worshiping demons or idea of breaking others temples in the name of religion and so on and anything of that sort. I am glad that concern for peoples health is utmost in your mind. +++$+++ ::::::::: Please remember to apply the same yardstick to to all religions practices that do not affect believers and non believers, like why should people inflict themselves pain in the name of religion knowingly. I am sure then that you are averse to calling non believers as worshiping demons or idea of breaking others temples in the name of religion and so on and anything of that sort. I am glad that concern for peoples health is utmost in your mind.[[User:Thisthat2011|Thisthat2011]] ([[User talk:Thisthat2011|talk]]) 15:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

265222 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-30 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.254324240E09 +++$+++ [[:File:EuroDishSBP front.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:EuroDishSBP front.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:EuroDishSBP front.jpg]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:File:EuroDishSBP front.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:EuroDishSBP front.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:EuroDishSBP front.jpg]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 08:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
265223 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265222 +++$+++ 265222 +++$+++ 2009-10-01 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.254463980E09 +++$+++ [[:File:OTEC diagram.gif]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:OTEC diagram.gif]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:OTEC diagram.gif]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:OTEC diagram.gif]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 23:13, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
265224 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265222 +++$+++ 265222 +++$+++ 2009-11-16 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.258437480E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Alfred Jodl USA-E-Ardennes-2.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Alfred Jodl USA-E-Ardennes-2.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Alfred Jodl USA-E-Ardennes-2.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Alfred Jodl USA-E-Ardennes-2.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 21:58, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

527368 +++$+++ Eagle 101 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-17 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.147928580E09 +++$+++ Ok, in that case, why don't we wait untill the weekend, I think the next release of VP is due then... I have a second method but it is long, and a tad technical:-(. If the new version of VP does not work for you, I will take you through it. (at least for now you have a sockpuppet that has been permitted to logon to VP.) Agian, if the new version does not work for you, then by all means please get my attention and I will take you through this.  +++$+++ Ok, in that case, why don't we wait untill the weekend, I think the next release of VP is due then... I have a second method but it is long, and a tad technical:-(. If the new version of VP does not work for you, I will take you through it. (at least for now you have a sockpuppet that has been permitted to logon to VP.) Agian, if the new version does not work for you, then by all means please get my attention and I will take you through this. [[user:Eagle 101|Eagle]]  [[user_talk:Eagle 101|talk]] 22:03, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
527369 +++$+++ Eagle 101 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527368 +++$+++ 527368 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.147929120E09 +++$+++ First off, check your cookies, do you have these four??? enwikiToken, enwikiUserID, enwiki_session, enwikiUserName? If not the problem is not VP. +++$+++ :First off, check your cookies, do you have these four??? enwikiToken, enwikiUserID, enwiki_session, enwikiUserName? If not the problem is not VP.[[user:Eagle 101|Eagle]]  [[user_talk:Eagle 101|talk]] 22:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
527370 +++$+++ Eagle 101 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527368 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-18 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.147936440E09 +++$+++ lol, were you online, on wikipedia at the time you checked? Session cookies are normally destroyed at the end of your browsing session on wikipedia. Regardless this confirms that it is VP that has the problem. If, after the update you are still having problems I will assist you then. (my alternate method may work, but it does require some contrived steps. (lets avoid this if possible:-) +++$+++ :::lol, were you online, on wikipedia at the time you checked? Session cookies are normally destroyed at the end of your browsing session on wikipedia. Regardless this confirms that it is VP that has the problem. If, after the update you are still having problems I will assist you then. (my alternate method may work, but it does require some contrived steps. (lets avoid this if possible:-)[[user:Eagle 101|Eagle]]  [[user_talk:Eagle 101|talk]] 00:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

265225 +++$+++ WFCforLife +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265225 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-10 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.257916380E09 +++$+++ Personally I believe the key to successfully bringing together the efforts of editors with interest in anything remotely Herts related will be to maintain at least a semi-active talk page at [[WT:HERTS]]. Feel free to give any thoughts or suggestions there, or even to ask if you simply want a second pair of eyes on something. Regards,  +++$+++ Personally I believe the key to successfully bringing together the efforts of editors with interest in anything remotely Herts related will be to maintain at least a semi-active talk page at [[WT:HERTS]]. Feel free to give any thoughts or suggestions there, or even to ask if you simply want a second pair of eyes on something. Regards, [[User:WFCforLife|WFCforLife]] ([[User talk:WFCforLife|talk]]) 21:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
265226 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265225 +++$+++ 265225 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.257975960E09 +++$+++ I'd forgotten I was a member but continue my interest in local history. I'll look for opportunities to get involved.  +++$+++ :I'd forgotten I was a member but continue my interest in local history. I'll look for opportunities to get involved. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 13:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

3082 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.309987500E09 +++$+++ Yes that and [[Lake Untersee]] are the nearest things on earth to extraterrestrial lakes, very unusual chemical properties. \u2666  +++$+++ Yes that and [[Lake Untersee]] are the nearest things on earth to extraterrestrial lakes, very unusual chemical properties. ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 14:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
3083 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3082 +++$+++ 3082 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.309998300E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on all your excellent work on the Levin article.  I agree with Dr. Blofeld about the sourcing - it seems that GA is the right place for this article for now.  I, of course, disagree strongly with the use of cite web and similar templates that make editing so much more difficult for non-techies (although I think cite book works well in the books list).  All the best!  --  +++$+++ :Congratulations on all your excellent work on the Levin article.  I agree with Dr. Blofeld about the sourcing - it seems that GA is the right place for this article for now.  I, of course, disagree strongly with the use of cite web and similar templates that make editing so much more difficult for non-techies (although I think cite book works well in the books list).  All the best!  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 17:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

265227 +++$+++ Troed +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265227 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-31 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.262311620E09 +++$+++ Regarding the extremely lengthy topic of renaming the CRU incident article, I just saw your comment about the alleged controversy just coming from \"bloggers\". I researched this earlier but you might've missed it, the talk page is a nightmare to follow. Both [http:\/\/transcripts.cnn.com\/TRANSCRIPTS\/0912\/07\/ec.01.html CNN], on this topic, and the BBC World while hosting a panel with [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=XR-zDyvFReY this years Nobel Prize winners] refer to this as a controversy and the latter even spend a lot of time talking this through in what it means for science. That would imply that this is a lot bigger than \"some bloggers\". Of course, maybe you knew this already and if so please disregard this comment.  +++$+++ Regarding the extremely lengthy topic of renaming the CRU incident article, I just saw your comment about the alleged controversy just coming from "bloggers". I researched this earlier but you might've missed it, the talk page is a nightmare to follow. Both [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0912/07/ec.01.html CNN], on this topic, and the BBC World while hosting a panel with [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XR-zDyvFReY this years Nobel Prize winners] refer to this as a controversy and the latter even spend a lot of time talking this through in what it means for science. That would imply that this is a lot bigger than "some bloggers". Of course, maybe you knew this already and if so please disregard this comment. [[User:Troed|Troed]] ([[User talk:Troed|talk]]) 18:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
265228 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265227 +++$+++ 265227 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.262418660E09 +++$+++ Neither of these use \"Controversy\" as the title for their reports which is what is being proposed in the discussion. There may be some who see a controversy here but this is not big enough to be the title of the article. Lets put it within the article as a section.  +++$+++ : Neither of these use "Controversy" as the title for their reports which is what is being proposed in the discussion. There may be some who see a controversy here but this is not big enough to be the title of the article. Lets put it within the article as a section. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 23:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

3084 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-07 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.310094240E09 +++$+++ Thanks!\u2666  +++$+++ Thanks!♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 20:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
3085 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3084 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310153340E09 +++$+++ I would use \"His\" only in the text, which includes the titles. But there it is. -- +++$+++ ::*I would use "His" only in the text, which includes the titles. But there it is. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 12:29, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
3086 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3084 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.310166720E09 +++$+++ I agree with that.  +++$+++ :::*I agree with that. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 16:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
3087 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3084 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.310169960E09 +++$+++ I've done a ce job on the section & reduced it by 100 words. Don't think I've left out anything important; if I have, by all means put it back.  +++$+++ **I've done a ce job on the section & reduced it by 100 words. Don't think I've left out anything important; if I have, by all means put it back. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 17:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
3088 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3084 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310172900E09 +++$+++ Sold! Seamlessly done.  +++$+++ ***Sold! Seamlessly done. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 17:55, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
3089 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3084 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310153340E09 +++$+++ I am trying to be as simple and untechnical as I can in the subarticles, but it's a slow process, up to 8 so far. -- +++$+++ ::*I am trying to be as simple and untechnical as I can in the subarticles, but it's a slow process, up to 8 so far. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 12:29, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

527374 +++$+++ Avraham +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-19 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.148023440E09 +++$+++ The former webmaster of the site (for 5+ years) has commented that there have been at least two other spinoffs. As such, perhaps this one is not [[Wikipedia:Importance|noteworthy]] either, and maybe no mention of it should be made. Could I trouble you to weigh in on the talk page, please? --  +++$+++ The former webmaster of the site (for 5+ years) has commented that there have been at least two other spinoffs. As such, perhaps this one is not [[Wikipedia:Importance|noteworthy]] either, and maybe no mention of it should be made. Could I trouble you to weigh in on the talk page, please? -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] 00:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
527375 +++$+++ Petros471 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527374 +++$+++ 527374 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.149367800E09 +++$+++ Just got around to this on [[WP:RFI]]. Do you still need help or is this sorted?  +++$+++ : Just got around to this on [[WP:RFI]]. Do you still need help or is this sorted? [[User:Petros471|Petros471]] 13:50, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

265231 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265231 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-18 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.263876780E09 +++$+++ Could you please either strike or rewrite your comments in this section?  You \"opposed\" the merger at 12:02 and then six minutes later you moved the article and redirected it.  Such an oppose doesn't make much sense now.  In any case, it would have been nice if there had been a bit more discussion, first, instead of the unilateral action.  +++$+++ Could you please either strike or rewrite your comments in this section?  You "opposed" the merger at 12:02 and then six minutes later you moved the article and redirected it.  Such an oppose doesn't make much sense now.  In any case, it would have been nice if there had been a bit more discussion, first, instead of the unilateral action. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 20:53, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
265232 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265231 +++$+++ 265231 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.263884520E09 +++$+++ I opposed the merger of Analemma_calendar with Anelemma on the basis that the article was about the Anelemma sundial. I then realized that the article was in fact mis-named and tidied it up, moving material from the [[sundial]] article which is flagged as too long and in need of being split into many articles. I have now re titled and expanded  the  \"(Analemma_calendar)\" article now called [[Analemmatic sundial]]. No changes have been made to the Anelemma article itself. I am still opposed to a merger of the sundial material into Anelemma, but I will tidy my comments there for clarity. Sorry if this is confusing.  +++$+++ :I opposed the merger of Analemma_calendar with Anelemma on the basis that the article was about the Anelemma sundial. I then realized that the article was in fact mis-named and tidied it up, moving material from the [[sundial]] article which is flagged as too long and in need of being split into many articles. I have now re titled and expanded  the  "(Analemma_calendar)" article now called [[Analemmatic sundial]]. No changes have been made to the Anelemma article itself. I am still opposed to a merger of the sundial material into Anelemma, but I will tidy my comments there for clarity. Sorry if this is confusing. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 23:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
265233 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265231 +++$+++ 265232 +++$+++ 2010-01-19 09:36:00 +++$+++ 1.263922560E09 +++$+++ It's not confusing to me, but surely you can see how your oppose to the merge of a non-existent article appeared strange.  Do you also understand that a \"see also\" is an indicator that a link or section discussing the topic the link describes, should be merged into the article?  This does not necessarily mean merging the entire article but incorporating the subtopic.  I have already posted a reference to an article in ''[[Centaurus (journal)|Centaurus]]'' by Nathan Sidoli that says, \"The analemma appears to have had its origin in gnomonics, the theory of sundials.\"  That's also obvious in the etymology, as the name of the topic comes from a sundial.  Although that particular article is focused on specific methods, there are other articles that discuss the analemma in terms of sundials as well.  I don't see the need for two articles at this time, but I'm not against it.  However, there is no reason to keep the two subjects separate, and we should follow [[WP:SS]].  +++$+++ ::It's not confusing to me, but surely you can see how your oppose to the merge of a non-existent article appeared strange.  Do you also understand that a "see also" is an indicator that a link or section discussing the topic the link describes, should be merged into the article?  This does not necessarily mean merging the entire article but incorporating the subtopic.  I have already posted a reference to an article in ''[[Centaurus (journal)|Centaurus]]'' by Nathan Sidoli that says, "The analemma appears to have had its origin in gnomonics, the theory of sundials."  That's also obvious in the etymology, as the name of the topic comes from a sundial.  Although that particular article is focused on specific methods, there are other articles that discuss the analemma in terms of sundials as well.  I don't see the need for two articles at this time, but I'm not against it.  However, there is no reason to keep the two subjects separate, and we should follow [[WP:SS]]. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 09:36, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

89056 +++$+++ Kebeta +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-28 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.291002480E09 +++$+++ Hi Joy, I have reverted [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Kosovo,_%C5%A0ibenik-Knin_County&diff=next&oldid=399044341 this]. See [http:\/\/www.knauf.hr\/o-knaufu\/knauf-u-hrvatskoj.aspx here]. Regards,  +++$+++ Hi Joy, I have reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kosovo,_%C5%A0ibenik-Knin_County&diff=next&oldid=399044341 this]. See [http://www.knauf.hr/o-knaufu/knauf-u-hrvatskoj.aspx here]. Regards, [[User:Kebeta|Kebeta]] ([[User talk:Kebeta|talk]]) 19:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
89057 +++$+++ Kebeta +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89056 +++$+++ 89056 +++$+++ 2010-11-28 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.291003260E09 +++$+++ Well, the last time I was there, the board with the name of the village was standing. Maybe not any more. Regards,  +++$+++ :Well, the last time I was there, the board with the name of the village was standing. Maybe not any more. Regards, [[User:Kebeta|Kebeta]] ([[User talk:Kebeta|talk]]) 20:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

481112 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-01 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.154478900E09 +++$+++ I fixed that. I'm fairly sure the rest are good, too. If at all possible, could there be two pics in the one larger pic? One could be a zoomed out pic with all of the storms, including those that didn't come near the state, and the other would be a zoomed in pic of Delaware with all storms that crossed the state. Hopefully that works out, and thanks again. Also, I support either version of the worldwide pic. They're both so good, that I can't decide! :)  +++$+++ I fixed that. I'm fairly sure the rest are good, too. If at all possible, could there be two pics in the one larger pic? One could be a zoomed out pic with all of the storms, including those that didn't come near the state, and the other would be a zoomed in pic of Delaware with all storms that crossed the state. Hopefully that works out, and thanks again. Also, I support either version of the worldwide pic. They're both so good, that I can't decide! :) [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 17:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
481113 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481112 +++$+++ 481112 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.154747880E09 +++$+++ Thanks! However, you're right, it isn't as useful as I had hoped, but oh well. It works.  +++$+++ :Thanks! However, you're right, it isn't as useful as I had hoped, but oh well. It works. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 20:18, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
481114 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481112 +++$+++ 481113 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.154748300E09 +++$+++ If it's not too much of a trouble for you, do you want to see what that would look like? I'll put the list on your request page.  +++$+++ ::If it's not too much of a trouble for you, do you want to see what that would look like? I'll put the list on your request page. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 20:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
481115 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481112 +++$+++ 481114 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.154827440E09 +++$+++ The new one looks good. Thanks. Also, the article quality is good as of August 2, so that should be representative for the month of July. I might have missed or added something (knowing me, that's probable ;)) but I think it's good. -- +++$+++ :::The new one looks good. Thanks. Also, the article quality is good as of August 2, so that should be representative for the month of July. I might have missed or added something (knowing me, that's probable ;)) but I think it's good. --[[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 18:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
481116 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481112 +++$+++ 481115 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.154827500E09 +++$+++ Also, shouldn't the newsletter be for July, not June? There are a few references to June (DYK). -- +++$+++ ::::Also, shouldn't the newsletter be for July, not June? There are a few references to June (DYK). --[[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 18:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

3090 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.310146200E09 +++$+++ I gather from the above that Levin has become a GA, so well done on that.  +++$+++ I gather from the above that Levin has become a GA, so well done on that. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 10:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
3091 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3090 +++$+++ 3090 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.310447940E09 +++$+++ I'm back from a 48-hour break. To me, ''Messiah'' looks ready for assessment by other eyes, so if it's OK with you I'll put it up for peer review tomorrow (Tuesday). I will ask Jappalang to look at all the images and soundfiles, and I'll also ask Ruhrfisch for a review since it was his suggestion that led me to start work on the article in the first place. When it's up, perhaps you would alert some of the gang who like your articles, so as to get the widest range of comments that we can.  +++$+++ :I'm back from a 48-hour break. To me, ''Messiah'' looks ready for assessment by other eyes, so if it's OK with you I'll put it up for peer review tomorrow (Tuesday). I will ask Jappalang to look at all the images and soundfiles, and I'll also ask Ruhrfisch for a review since it was his suggestion that led me to start work on the article in the first place. When it's up, perhaps you would alert some of the gang who like your articles, so as to get the widest range of comments that we can. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 22:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
3092 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3090 +++$+++ 3091 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.310448360E09 +++$+++ Hope the break was pleasing; welcome back to the workhouse \u2013 bowl of gruel, anyone? Yes, by all means put Messiah up for PR. I shall spread the word.  +++$+++ ::Hope the break was pleasing; welcome back to the workhouse – bowl of gruel, anyone? Yes, by all means put Messiah up for PR. I shall spread the word. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 22:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

262659 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-23 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.174681920E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your excellent expansion of [[Samuel Gee]]. I put shamefully little work into that, and now it's respectably comprehensive!  +++$+++ Thanks for your excellent expansion of [[Samuel Gee]]. I put shamefully little work into that, and now it's respectably comprehensive! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 13:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
262660 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262659 +++$+++ 262659 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.174684620E09 +++$+++ Looks great to me. I was afraid someone would notice my brain-freeze\u2014I am glad you found it amusing, though :) Do you think you'd be able to find an image of Gee? The ''BMJ'' article JFW mentioned has one, but it's apparently copyrighted. I haven't had much luck, and thought you might, seeing as how you were able to get pics for [[D\xe9sir\xe9-Magloire Bourneville]] and [[\xc9douard Brissaud]]...  +++$+++ :Looks great to me. I was afraid someone would notice my brain-freeze—I am glad you found it amusing, though :) Do you think you'd be able to find an image of Gee? The ''BMJ'' article JFW mentioned has one, but it's apparently copyrighted. I haven't had much luck, and thought you might, seeing as how you were able to get pics for [[Désiré-Magloire Bourneville]] and [[Édouard Brissaud]]... [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 14:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
262661 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262659 +++$+++ 262660 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.174684680E09 +++$+++ And yes, some of his original text would be quite useful. Don't worry, you can go ahead; I'm quite busy today and will probably not beat you to it!  +++$+++ ::And yes, some of his original text would be quite useful. Don't worry, you can go ahead; I'm quite busy today and will probably not beat you to it! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 14:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
262662 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262659 +++$+++ 262661 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.174716060E09 +++$+++ Hm. I think that's a fair guess; I presumed it was copyright due to the \"reprinted\/used with kind permission from...\" or whatnot present in the caption (I have to look at the article again, I don't recall it exactly). I'm actually in Brazil, which has, I believe, slightly more draconian IP laws, although I'm minimally familiar with them. I suppose there's no problem\u2014worst case scenario, it can be tagged as fair use, however suboptimal that would be.  +++$+++ :::Hm. I think that's a fair guess; I presumed it was copyright due to the "reprinted/used with kind permission from..." or whatnot present in the caption (I have to look at the article again, I don't recall it exactly). I'm actually in Brazil, which has, I believe, slightly more draconian IP laws, although I'm minimally familiar with them. I suppose there's no problem—worst case scenario, it can be tagged as fair use, however suboptimal that would be. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 23:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
262663 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262659 +++$+++ 262661 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.174801620E09 +++$+++ Hey, I see you added the portrait already\u2014I hadn't forgotten, I was just waiting for you to show up again on my Watchlist before asking you to mail me the instructions :) Thanks again Colin, you didn't have to go to the trouble yourself. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Hey, I see you added the portrait already—I hadn't forgotten, I was just waiting for you to show up again on my Watchlist before asking you to mail me the instructions :) Thanks again Colin, you didn't have to go to the trouble yourself. Cheers, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 22:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
262664 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262659 +++$+++ 262663 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.174806480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the software tips as well. I hope you'll make good use of the page layout :)  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for the software tips as well. I hope you'll make good use of the page layout :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 00:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

568494 +++$+++ Daniel5127 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-30 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.151652420E09 +++$+++ Sorry for interrupting you, I have seen your message many times in someone's discussion's page. But You just copied whole thing. I'm so sorry to say that your message is so confusing like you copied someone's message, not only response. Next time, Please only put your response, after you reply some Wikipedian's message in this discussion page.  +++$+++ Sorry for interrupting you, I have seen your message many times in someone's discussion's page. But You just copied whole thing. I'm so sorry to say that your message is so confusing like you copied someone's message, not only response. Next time, Please only put your response, after you reply some Wikipedian's message in this discussion page. [[User:Daniel5127|*~Daniel~*]] 00:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
568495 +++$+++ ForestH2 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568494 +++$+++ 568494 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.151653500E09 +++$+++ I don't know. I thought it was good to also put the question or comment given when your reply. And I'm sure how it is confusing. It's good to put the question or comment and the answer so I can know the question and the answer and you can remember the question more easily and compare it to the comment.  +++$+++ :I don't know. I thought it was good to also put the question or comment given when your reply. And I'm sure how it is confusing. It's good to put the question or comment and the answer so I can know the question and the answer and you can remember the question more easily and compare it to the comment. [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 00:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
568496 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568494 +++$+++ 568495 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.151714040E09 +++$+++ Were either of you two talking to me? The above exchange appears to be a private conversation that has spilled out on to my Talk page by mistake.  Just in case you '''were''' talking to me and wanted my views on Talk page etiquette, you can find official guidance at [[Wikipedia:Talk_page#How_to_keep_a_two-way_conversation_readable]].  I prefer to keep contributors' exchanges in one place for ease of reference at a later date.  Please [[WP:CIVIL|be civil]] when trying to tell other editors and administrators how to conduct themselves with other users! Policy is very easy to find using [http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/advanced_search?hl=en Google's advanced search features]. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ ::Were either of you two talking to me? The above exchange appears to be a private conversation that has spilled out on to my Talk page by mistake.  Just in case you '''were''' talking to me and wanted my views on Talk page etiquette, you can find official guidance at [[Wikipedia:Talk_page#How_to_keep_a_two-way_conversation_readable]].  I prefer to keep contributors' exchanges in one place for ease of reference at a later date.  Please [[WP:CIVIL|be civil]] when trying to tell other editors and administrators how to conduct themselves with other users! Policy is very easy to find using [http://www.google.co.uk/advanced_search?hl=en Google's advanced search features]. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 17:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
568497 +++$+++ ForestH2 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568494 +++$+++ 568494 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.151714700E09 +++$+++ I was reading Daniel's message and I kind of confused why it's confusing to have the question\/comment and the answer. Yeah I was talking to you. What do you mean civil? I think my first comment was [[WP:CIVIL|civil]]. Wasn't it? Or were you talking to Daniel? [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] | [[User talk:ForestH2|+]] | [[Special:Contributions\/ForestH2|\u221a]] |  +++$+++ :I was reading Daniel's message and I kind of confused why it's confusing to have the question/comment and the answer. Yeah I was talking to you. What do you mean civil? I think my first comment was [[WP:CIVIL|civil]]. Wasn't it? Or were you talking to Daniel? [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] | [[User talk:ForestH2|+]] | [[Special:Contributions/ForestH2|√]] | [[User:ForestH2/Userpage|-]] 17:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
568498 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568494 +++$+++ 568497 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.151715120E09 +++$+++ Yes, I was referring to Daniel - I should have made that clear, apologies.  It reads as if I am being told what to do without any prior discussion, most confusing! Still, the guidelines are there for you to refer to. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ ::Yes, I was referring to Daniel - I should have made that clear, apologies.  It reads as if I am being told what to do without any prior discussion, most confusing! Still, the guidelines are there for you to refer to. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 17:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
568499 +++$+++ ForestH2 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568494 +++$+++ 568494 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.151715240E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I noticed that Daniel never communicated with and went through your contributions and just decided to give you the note. I sort of wonder why it's so confusing. And I really can't even understand his message because of his grammar [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] | [[User talk:ForestH2|+]] | [[Special:Contributions\/ForestH2|\u221a]] |  +++$+++ :Thank you. I noticed that Daniel never communicated with and went through your contributions and just decided to give you the note. I sort of wonder why it's so confusing. And I really can't even understand his message because of his grammar [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] | [[User talk:ForestH2|+]] | [[Special:Contributions/ForestH2|√]] | [[User:ForestH2/Userpage|-]] 17:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

527384 +++$+++ Ral315 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527384 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-26 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.151389080E09 +++$+++ Are you still interested in becoming a mediator?   +++$+++ Are you still interested in becoming a mediator?  [[User:Ral315|Ral315]] ([[User talk:Ral315|talk]]) 23:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
527385 +++$+++ Ral315 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527384 +++$+++ 527384 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.151395560E09 +++$+++ It is my pleasure to announce that after great consideration, you have been accepted as a member of the  [[WP:MC|Mediation Committee]]. I encourage you to place the Mediation Committee page and [[WP:RFM|Requests for Mediation]] on your watchlist, as well as [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation\/Open Tasks|the open tasks page]], which will be updated as new cases are accepted. You may also (and are encouraged to) join the Committee's [http:\/\/mail.wikipedia.org\/mailman\/listinfo\/mediation-en-l internal mailing list.] If you have any questions about how the committee functions, please feel free to ask me or one of the other mediators.  Congratulations on becoming a member!   +++$+++ : It is my pleasure to announce that after great consideration, you have been accepted as a member of the  [[WP:MC|Mediation Committee]]. I encourage you to place the Mediation Committee page and [[WP:RFM|Requests for Mediation]] on your watchlist, as well as [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Open Tasks|the open tasks page]], which will be updated as new cases are accepted. You may also (and are encouraged to) join the Committee's [http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediation-en-l internal mailing list.] If you have any questions about how the committee functions, please feel free to ask me or one of the other mediators.  Congratulations on becoming a member!  [[User:Ral315|Ral315]] ([[User talk:Ral315|talk]]) 01:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

265242 +++$+++ Luigibob +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-08 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.268107380E09 +++$+++ I noticed you added lots of info to this film.  The new \"Symbolism\" section does need references.  Thx.  +++$+++ I noticed you added lots of info to this film.  The new "Symbolism" section does need references.  Thx. [[User:Luigibob|Luigibob]] ([[User talk:Luigibob|talk]]) 20:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
265243 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265242 +++$+++ 265242 +++$+++ 2010-03-08 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.268113740E09 +++$+++ Checking for sources. +++$+++ :Checking for sources.[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 21:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

3100 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.310401560E09 +++$+++ And there's [http:\/\/www.achurchnearyou.com\/parish\/420043\/ this]. The C of E site might  be considered reliable. -- +++$+++ And there's [http://www.achurchnearyou.com/parish/420043/ this]. The C of E site might  be considered reliable. --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 09:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
3101 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3100 +++$+++ 3100 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.310402700E09 +++$+++ That'll do me. I shall, however, forbear to carry the statement across to the Elgar article until I find a second source corroborating it. O me of little faith!  +++$+++ :That'll do me. I shall, however, forbear to carry the statement across to the Elgar article until I find a second source corroborating it. O me of little faith! [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 09:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
3102 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3100 +++$+++ 3101 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310418480E09 +++$+++ I'll dig around in  Malvern next  week. I'll  go to  the church  and to  the school. The vicar is a family  friend. -- +++$+++ ::I'll dig around in  Malvern next  week. I'll  go to  the church  and to  the school. The vicar is a family  friend. --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 14:08, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
3103 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3100 +++$+++ 3102 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310419080E09 +++$+++ Bon voyage! Let me know if you want any digging done on GBS and Malvern.  +++$+++ :::Bon voyage! Let me know if you want any digging done on GBS and Malvern. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 14:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

3104 +++$+++ Jappalang +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310631480E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim.  Unfortunately, I believe that Britten photograph is still pretty much copyrighted in the UK.  I have detailed my thoughts in the speedy deletion request on the photograph, but in short, Boosey & Hawkes is a UK company and that photograph would have been very much first published in the UK, where copyright law gives 70 years of protection since publication (thus copyrighted till start of 2016).  We have not even considered the US side for this photograph as well.   +++$+++ Hi Tim.  Unfortunately, I believe that Britten photograph is still pretty much copyrighted in the UK.  I have detailed my thoughts in the speedy deletion request on the photograph, but in short, Boosey & Hawkes is a UK company and that photograph would have been very much first published in the UK, where copyright law gives 70 years of protection since publication (thus copyrighted till start of 2016).  We have not even considered the US side for this photograph as well.  [[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|talk]]) 01:18, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
3105 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3104 +++$+++ 3104 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310698020E09 +++$+++ Why not move it to En.Wiki and use it as a fair use image?  --  +++$+++ :Why not move it to En.Wiki and use it as a fair use image?  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 19:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

527393 +++$+++ WCityMike +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-25 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.153874880E09 +++$+++ I've retired from Wikipedia, and thus, my mediation with PT is moot.  Thank you for your efforts thus far in the mediation.  My talk page has been deleted at my request, so no need to reply.  Good luck in your future edits. &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ I've retired from Wikipedia, and thus, my mediation with PT is moot.  Thank you for your efforts thus far in the mediation.  My talk page has been deleted at my request, so no need to reply.  Good luck in your future edits. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:WCityMike|'''Mike''']] 17:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
527394 +++$+++ parsssseltongue +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527393 +++$+++ 527393 +++$+++ 2006-07-25 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.153875000E09 +++$+++ Totally stunned... but, I guess I'll second that close?  +++$+++ *Totally stunned... but, I guess I'll second that close? [[User:parsssseltongue|<font color="Green">PT</font>]] <sup>([[User_talk:parsssseltongue|<font color="Green">s-s-s-s</font>]])</sup> 17:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

3106 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3106 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.310670360E09 +++$+++ As we have lost the soundfile from Part III (see PR), and as it seems possible that there are no PD soundfiles for this Part, I have restored your \"Worthy is the Lamb\" manuscript illustration. Can you check out the source information on the image file? If this is incorrect, can you include full publication details of the source you scanned it from?  +++$+++ As we have lost the soundfile from Part III (see PR), and as it seems possible that there are no PD soundfiles for this Part, I have restored your "Worthy is the Lamb" manuscript illustration. Can you check out the source information on the image file? If this is incorrect, can you include full publication details of the source you scanned it from? [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 12:06, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
3107 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3106 +++$+++ 3106 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.310697900E09 +++$+++ The Edison sound files are Public Domain and can be used.  The person objecting to them has drawn an erroneous conclusion about the copyright without actually looking into it.  See the PR page.  --  +++$+++ :The Edison sound files are Public Domain and can be used.  The person objecting to them has drawn an erroneous conclusion about the copyright without actually looking into it.  See the PR page.  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 19:45, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

527395 +++$+++ Wikipedical +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-09 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.155110160E09 +++$+++ Hope you could look at our recent discussion, we seem to be stuck.  --   +++$+++ Hope you could look at our recent discussion, we seem to be stuck.  --  [[User:Wikipedical|Wikipedical]] 00:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
527396 +++$+++ Wikipedical +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527395 +++$+++ 527395 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.157512620E09 +++$+++ If you can, please contact [[User:Essjay]] for us about how to proceed.  The mediation has been idle for quite some time.  --   +++$+++ :If you can, please contact [[User:Essjay]] for us about how to proceed.  The mediation has been idle for quite some time.  --  [[User:Wikipedical|Wikipedical]] 20:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

3109 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3109 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-17 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.310926020E09 +++$+++ Presently at PR as it makes a move towards FA at last.  Your international perspective welcome.-- +++$+++ Presently at PR as it makes a move towards FA at last.  Your international perspective welcome.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 11:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
3110 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3109 +++$+++ 3109 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310929500E09 +++$+++ I share a birthday (different year, they tell me) with the great man. Shall be honoured to PR him.  +++$+++ :I share a birthday (different year, they tell me) with the great man. Shall be honoured to PR him. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 12:05, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
3111 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3109 +++$+++ 3110 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.310930760E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  I am hoping to get it main page for his 100th and your er, perhaps better not to go there in a couple of years.-- +++$+++ ::Thank you.  I am hoping to get it main page for his 100th and your er, perhaps better not to go there in a couple of years.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 12:26, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

265256 +++$+++ HaeB +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-28 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.280379120E09 +++$+++ Hi Lumos3, it seems your edit [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost\/2010-07-26\/Discussion_report&curid=28166298&diff=375980280&oldid=375850584 here] inadvertently corrupted the layout template and several comments by other users. Maybe it was caused by a malfunctioning automatic spellchecker or something similar? Apart from that, thanks for reading and commenting on the Signpost! Feedback helps us in deciding what kind of coverage we should have in future Signpost issues. Regards,  +++$+++ Hi Lumos3, it seems your edit [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-07-26/Discussion_report&curid=28166298&diff=375980280&oldid=375850584 here] inadvertently corrupted the layout template and several comments by other users. Maybe it was caused by a malfunctioning automatic spellchecker or something similar? Apart from that, thanks for reading and commenting on the Signpost! Feedback helps us in deciding what kind of coverage we should have in future Signpost issues. Regards, [[User:HaeB|HaeB]] ([[User talk:HaeB|talk]]) 21:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
265257 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265256 +++$+++ 265256 +++$+++ 2010-07-28 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.280379600E09 +++$+++ Apologies , I used the Google toolbar spell checker which has caused problems for me in the past.  +++$+++ :Apologies , I used the Google toolbar spell checker which has caused problems for me in the past. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 22:00, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

3116 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311537900E09 +++$+++ style=\"font-variant:small-caps;color:#000\">Dr. Blofeld<\/span>]] 13:05, 24 July 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 13:05, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
3117 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3116 +++$+++ 3116 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.311544980E09 +++$+++ I'm only fleetingly online this week, so please forgive me if I duck this one till Thursday.  +++$+++ :I'm only fleetingly online this week, so please forgive me if I duck this one till Thursday. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 15:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
3118 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3116 +++$+++ 3116 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311544740E09 +++$+++ Am in Cumbria with limited web access till Thursday, but will give the article the once-over tomorrow if I can.  +++$+++ :Am in Cumbria with limited web access till Thursday, but will give the article the once-over tomorrow if I can. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 14:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
3119 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3116 +++$+++ 3118 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311616260E09 +++$+++ If it's OK with you, I'll nominate on Wednesday. There probably won't be many comments to field before your return on Thursday> I'll ask Gerda if she wants to be a conom.  +++$+++ ::If it's OK with you, I'll nominate on Wednesday. There probably won't be many comments to field before your return on Thursday> I'll ask Gerda if she wants to be a conom. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 10:51, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
3120 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3116 +++$+++ 3119 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311617940E09 +++$+++ Looking here: what does that mean? (Watching here, to leave it one place), -- +++$+++ :::Looking here: what does that mean? (Watching here, to leave it one place), --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 11:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
3121 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3116 +++$+++ 3120 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.311644280E09 +++$+++ I've reread the article, and spell-checked it. All fine ''me judice'' (except for a \"greviously\", in a quote, which still troubles me. Very happy to join Gerda as co-nominator, but we sail under the flag of Captain Boulton.  +++$+++ ::::I've reread the article, and spell-checked it. All fine ''me judice'' (except for a "greviously", in a quote, which still troubles me. Very happy to join Gerda as co-nominator, but we sail under the flag of Captain Boulton. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 18:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
3122 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3116 +++$+++ 3121 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311646080E09 +++$+++ Still don't know what that means. I didn't do much more than getting Bach out of the game, even if reliable sources saw him in. For the extra articles I got DYK credit, 3 of 4 so far, I'm quite happy as is, -- +++$+++ :::::Still don't know what that means. I didn't do much more than getting Bach out of the game, even if reliable sources saw him in. For the extra articles I got DYK credit, 3 of 4 so far, I'm quite happy as is, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 19:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
3123 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3116 +++$+++ 3122 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.311831180E09 +++$+++ Gerda, you are part of the team and that is that. I  have just made the nomination; I am off-wiki until late on Thursday (in London erecting a bed for my daughter, believe it or not) so I won't be able to field the early comments, but I don't expect there'll be many. I am letting the main peer-reviewers know about the nomination, but feel free to spread the word; an active nom is always a good thing.  +++$+++ ::::::Gerda, you are part of the team and that is that. I  have just made the nomination; I am off-wiki until late on Thursday (in London erecting a bed for my daughter, believe it or not) so I won't be able to field the early comments, but I don't expect there'll be many. I am letting the main peer-reviewers know about the nomination, but feel free to spread the word; an active nom is always a good thing. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 22:33, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
3124 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3116 +++$+++ 3123 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 08:55:00 +++$+++ 1.311954900E09 +++$+++ In the event, \"I don't expect there'll be many\" was a bit off the mark, and a highly active first 24 hours has brought us six supports, some useful comments, and some minor disagreement. So all looks healthy thus far. Tim, will you be fielding Nikki's remaining source queries? We don't want to duplicate our efforts.  +++$+++ :::::::In the event, "I don't expect there'll be many" was a bit off the mark, and a highly active first 24 hours has brought us six supports, some useful comments, and some minor disagreement. So all looks healthy thus far. Tim, will you be fielding Nikki's remaining source queries? We don't want to duplicate our efforts. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 08:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
3125 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3116 +++$+++ 3124 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.311955020E09 +++$+++ Happy to do so, but didn't want to tread on your toes. I will attend to the outstanding points unless you tell me not to.  +++$+++ ::::::::Happy to do so, but didn't want to tread on your toes. I will attend to the outstanding points unless you tell me not to. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 08:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

265262 +++$+++ RockyMM +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-09 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.147162740E09 +++$+++ Also, I see that you are new here. I hope you're going to enjoy being a [[Wikipedian]]. Bye! -- +++$+++ Also, I see that you are new here. I hope you're going to enjoy being a [[Wikipedian]]. Bye! --[[User:RockyMM|RockyMM]] 01:19, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
265263 +++$+++ RockyMM +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265262 +++$+++ 265262 +++$+++ 2006-05-10 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.147289280E09 +++$+++ Hey, what's all this about serial killer? I have REMOVED that statement from Che's article. It wasn't me who wrote those words. I deleted them! Or you disagree with my deletition??? It is Wikipedia's policy that only proven and verifiable facts should be in articles, and I try to stick to those policies. Maybe you got confused when you were watching history page?-- +++$+++ : Hey, what's all this about serial killer? I have REMOVED that statement from Che's article. It wasn't me who wrote those words. I deleted them! Or you disagree with my deletition??? It is Wikipedia's policy that only proven and verifiable facts should be in articles, and I try to stick to those policies. Maybe you got confused when you were watching history page?--[[User:RockyMM|RockyMM]] 12:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
265264 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265262 +++$+++ 265262 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.147400160E09 +++$+++ I believe the method I use is still a slightly uncommon on Wikipedia, because you don't see it in all articles (even featured ones). Just have a look at the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Citation_templates citation templates] and [[Wikipedia:Footnotes|Footnotes]], if you want to know more. Oh, and by the way, I think your doing a good job rewriting and editing the Castro article. <strong> +++$+++ :I believe the method I use is still a slightly uncommon on Wikipedia, because you don't see it in all articles (even featured ones). Just have a look at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Citation_templates citation templates] and [[Wikipedia:Footnotes|Footnotes]], if you want to know more. Oh, and by the way, I think your doing a good job rewriting and editing the Castro article. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 19:16, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

265265 +++$+++ Fan-1967 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265265 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-12 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.147482180E09 +++$+++ It looks as if you created this article and then changed your mind and wanted it deleted. However, the deletion process was never completed. Generally, if someone is the only editor of an article, and wants it removed, it's easy. Just edit the article and, instead of the AfD tag you used, put '''<nowiki>{{db-author}}<\/nowiki>''' at the top of the page. This translates to, basically, \"The author would like this deleted.\" It will usually get picked up and deleted within a few hours. Hope this helps.  +++$+++ It looks as if you created this article and then changed your mind and wanted it deleted. However, the deletion process was never completed. Generally, if someone is the only editor of an article, and wants it removed, it's easy. Just edit the article and, instead of the AfD tag you used, put '''<nowiki>{{db-author}}</nowiki>''' at the top of the page. This translates to, basically, "The author would like this deleted." It will usually get picked up and deleted within a few hours. Hope this helps. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan1967]] 18:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
265266 +++$+++ Fan-1967 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265265 +++$+++ 265265 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.147482720E09 +++$+++ Some admin must have been sitting around with nothing to do. It's already gone.  +++$+++ :Some admin must have been sitting around with nothing to do. It's already gone. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan1967]] 18:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
265267 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265265 +++$+++ 265265 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.148103480E09 +++$+++ I fixed it. The reason why was because the url part missed an \"=\", it causes the citation template to break. <strong> +++$+++ :I fixed it. The reason why was because the url part missed an "=", it causes the citation template to break. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 22:38, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
265268 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265265 +++$+++ 265265 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.148343180E09 +++$+++ I can't find the Frank Pais link. Could you give me a more precise location (e.g. around which sentence). <strong> +++$+++ :I can't find the Frank Pais link. Could you give me a more precise location (e.g. around which sentence). <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 17:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
265269 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265265 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.148346540E09 +++$+++ Wow... I must say Teemu Ruskeep\xe4\xe4 was a bit overzealous in his deletion quest. A short article isn't necessarily a good article so I think the best thing to do is restore the content you added (which was lengthy and good) and ask Teemu what is reasons were for deleting all the content. If needed I can help you with restoring the content which was lost in the later editing sessions. <strong> +++$+++ :::Wow... I must say Teemu Ruskeepää was a bit overzealous in his deletion quest. A short article isn't necessarily a good article so I think the best thing to do is restore the content you added (which was lengthy and good) and ask Teemu what is reasons were for deleting all the content. If needed I can help you with restoring the content which was lost in the later editing sessions. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 18:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
265270 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265265 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.148356320E09 +++$+++ Restoring is indeed a quite hard, but the mass removals crippled the article, events like [[Bogotazo]] aren't covered at all in the article anymore. Shall I attempt to recover some of the material, most notably the things from [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fidel_Castro&oldid=54498526 this] revision? I think Teemu should've discussed such mass removals on the talk page of the Castro article, although [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|Be bold]] is a Wikipedia motto. <strong> +++$+++ ::::: Restoring is indeed a quite hard, but the mass removals crippled the article, events like [[Bogotazo]] aren't covered at all in the article anymore. Shall I attempt to recover some of the material, most notably the things from [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fidel_Castro&oldid=54498526 this] revision? I think Teemu should've discussed such mass removals on the talk page of the Castro article, although [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|Be bold]] is a Wikipedia motto. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 20:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
265271 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265265 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.148357640E09 +++$+++ Just restored some of the content (hope I did it right) and left a message on the article talk page to explain this. <strong> +++$+++ ::::: Just restored some of the content (hope I did it right) and left a message on the article talk page to explain this. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 21:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

527413 +++$+++ N2e +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.163333940E09 +++$+++ Hi ^demon, I know you accepted a mediation case on the ongoing revert war going on between Smallbones and Rgfolsom on the [[Socionomics]] article.  It quieted down for a few days, but now the article is back getting reverted back and forth with little forward progress.  I have an opinion on the matter, and if you ask (or email me if you can figure out how to do that) I will be glad to give it to you.  I'm also willing to put it in the talk page on the article. (And in fact I did put a little in once about a week or two ago.)  I don't understand how these kind of revert wars eventually get stopped...  What is the next step to ending the war?  Thanks.   +++$+++ Hi ^demon, I know you accepted a mediation case on the ongoing revert war going on between Smallbones and Rgfolsom on the [[Socionomics]] article.  It quieted down for a few days, but now the article is back getting reverted back and forth with little forward progress.  I have an opinion on the matter, and if you ask (or email me if you can figure out how to do that) I will be glad to give it to you.  I'm also willing to put it in the talk page on the article. (And in fact I did put a little in once about a week or two ago.)  I don't understand how these kind of revert wars eventually get stopped...  What is the next step to ending the war?  Thanks.  [[User:N2e|N2e]] 04:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
527414 +++$+++ N2e +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527413 +++$+++ 527413 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.163581020E09 +++$+++ ^demon, can you please point me to where I could learn about WP policy\/practice relative to how it is advised to best stop\/slowDown\/moderate a revert war, like the one I referred to above?  I don't really want to get into the middle of the fight (tar baby?), but I believe some reasonable outsider needs to review the [[Socionomics]] debate and enter in some balanced opinion.  Also, what ever happened to the mediation case?  Will a result or status get published if I just wait it out? Thanks.   +++$+++ :^demon, can you please point me to where I could learn about WP policy/practice relative to how it is advised to best stop/slowDown/moderate a revert war, like the one I referred to above?  I don't really want to get into the middle of the fight (tar baby?), but I believe some reasonable outsider needs to review the [[Socionomics]] debate and enter in some balanced opinion.  Also, what ever happened to the mediation case?  Will a result or status get published if I just wait it out? Thanks.  [[User:N2e|N2e]] 00:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
527415 +++$+++ N2e +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527413 +++$+++ 527414 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.163639220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply.  I will try to stand back and patiently wait for the standard wiki-practices to have their hoped-for effect in this great [[Emergence|emergent phenomenon]] we call Wikipedia where [[Self-organization|self-organizing behavior]] can result in a [[spontaneous order]].   +++$+++ ::Thanks for your reply.  I will try to stand back and patiently wait for the standard wiki-practices to have their hoped-for effect in this great [[Emergence|emergent phenomenon]] we call Wikipedia where [[Self-organization|self-organizing behavior]] can result in a [[spontaneous order]].  [[User:N2e|N2e]] 17:07, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

3126 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311568080E09 +++$+++ I've just glanced through Offenbach (have you heard the one about the two musical dogs and the musical cat?) and noticed that [[musette]] leads to a dab page, none of whose definitions seem to fit a work for cello and piano (?or cello and orchestra?  Or both?) unless it's the bal-musette, which it probably isn't.  Will have a longer look tomorrow with a view to contributing to the PR. Best. --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ I've just glanced through Offenbach (have you heard the one about the two musical dogs and the musical cat?) and noticed that [[musette]] leads to a dab page, none of whose definitions seem to fit a work for cello and piano (?or cello and orchestra?  Or both?) unless it's the bal-musette, which it probably isn't.  Will have a longer look tomorrow with a view to contributing to the PR. Best. --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 21:28, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
3127 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3126 +++$+++ 3126 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.311676860E09 +++$+++ I will be glad to review it though it may take me a few days.  +++$+++ :I will be glad to review it though it may take me a few days. [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 03:41, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
3128 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3126 +++$+++ 3127 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.312045020E09 +++$+++ Wondering if you missed my short list of fairly well-known numbers which I interposed after Ssilvers had asked about adding some somewhere?  Should I perhaps give this more prominence by moving it to the end and giving it a header? Then others who may have missed it might comment? --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ ::Wondering if you missed my short list of fairly well-known numbers which I interposed after Ssilvers had asked about adding some somewhere?  Should I perhaps give this more prominence by moving it to the end and giving it a header? Then others who may have missed it might comment? --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 09:57, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
3129 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3126 +++$+++ 3128 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.312045500E09 +++$+++ I had indeed missed it - very remiss of me. Yes, I'm sure giving it a new slot in the latest section would be a good idea. We might be able to assemble a very useful section for the \"Works\" part of the article. Rigorous forensic examination of my contributions would probably reveal my bias in favour of up-tempo numbers, and it will be no bad thing to have some slower numbers given a bit of spotlight.  +++$+++ :::I had indeed missed it - very remiss of me. Yes, I'm sure giving it a new slot in the latest section would be a good idea. We might be able to assemble a very useful section for the "Works" part of the article. Rigorous forensic examination of my contributions would probably reveal my bias in favour of up-tempo numbers, and it will be no bad thing to have some slower numbers given a bit of spotlight. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 10:05, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

524809 +++$+++ Raul654 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524809 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-08 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.199832900E09 +++$+++ Re:[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Contact_us\/Photo_submission&oldid=181937759 this] - while we've gotten about one response per day to the photo submission service, today was the first time someone actually followed the directions and specified a license. See [[The Essentials (band)]] for the picture.  +++$+++ Re:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Contact_us/Photo_submission&oldid=181937759 this] - while we've gotten about one response per day to the photo submission service, today was the first time someone actually followed the directions and specified a license. See [[The Essentials (band)]] for the picture. [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654|talk]]) 14:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
524810 +++$+++ Raul654 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524809 +++$+++ 524809 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.199943960E09 +++$+++ We got our second successful use of the service today - [[Eli Gold]]  +++$+++ :We got our second successful use of the service today - [[Eli Gold]] [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654|talk]]) 21:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
524811 +++$+++ Raul654 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524809 +++$+++ 524809 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.199966400E09 +++$+++ [[Steve Forbes|And now our third]]...  +++$+++ :[[Steve Forbes|And now our third]]... [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654|talk]]) 04:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
524812 +++$+++ Raul654 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524809 +++$+++ 524809 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.200022680E09 +++$+++ Here's #4 - [[Pat Condell]], and #5, [[Jacques Calonne]]. The latter was possible thanks to the efforts of [[user:Wegge]] (I needed a Danish speaker to help me with this one)  +++$+++ :Here's #4 - [[Pat Condell]], and #5, [[Jacques Calonne]]. The latter was possible thanks to the efforts of [[user:Wegge]] (I needed a Danish speaker to help me with this one) [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654|talk]]) 19:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
524813 +++$+++ Raul654 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524809 +++$+++ 524809 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.200384240E09 +++$+++ #6 - [[Tom Miller (travel writer)]], and #7 - [[Dave Mejias]]  +++$+++ : #6 - [[Tom Miller (travel writer)]], and #7 - [[Dave Mejias]] [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654|talk]]) 00:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

265273 +++$+++ Zleitzen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265273 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-23 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.148381280E09 +++$+++ Please address the major changes you are making to the Fidel Castro article on that talk page as soon as possible, thank you.-- +++$+++ Please address the major changes you are making to the Fidel Castro article on that talk page as soon as possible, thank you.--[[User:Zleitzen|Zleitzen]] 03:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
265274 +++$+++ Zleitzen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265273 +++$+++ 265273 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.148385900E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, KarenAnn. I had a look at the page and it looks like you've done some really good work on the Castro page so far. Don't let Teemu's comments discourage you, although other users are bound to tweak little things etc - I changed a couple of links etc.  I didn't understand Teemu's comments about moving stuff around myself. I'm also not sure if he's up to speed with subject matter. Would you mind if we reinstated your work soon so users can carry on improving the page? And you're more than welcome to carry on if you're willing to stick at it, it's good to see an editor who is dedicated to sources and citations.-- +++$+++ :Don't worry, KarenAnn. I had a look at the page and it looks like you've done some really good work on the Castro page so far. Don't let Teemu's comments discourage you, although other users are bound to tweak little things etc - I changed a couple of links etc.  I didn't understand Teemu's comments about moving stuff around myself. I'm also not sure if he's up to speed with subject matter. Would you mind if we reinstated your work soon so users can carry on improving the page? And you're more than welcome to carry on if you're willing to stick at it, it's good to see an editor who is dedicated to sources and citations.--[[User:Zleitzen|Zleitzen]] 05:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
265275 +++$+++ Zleitzen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265273 +++$+++ 265274 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.148390520E09 +++$+++ It'll take me about 10 minutes to reinstate all your work, so it's certainly not lost at all and it's highly valuable. It's all there in the history section. I agree it can be demoralising work though, anything to do with Cuba can be a real struggle being surrounded by ideologues with agendas - you should try writing on the main page - it's a nightmare, I was accused of bias for writing \"Cuba is prone to devastating hurricanes\"! Maybe give it a short while and come back to Castro when it's settled down because it sounds like you have a solid, neutral and interesting take on the subject matter. By the way, I've just written this article - [[Ubre Blanca]], feel free to take a look and have a tweak - it's about one of the more bizarre episodes of the Castro era.-- +++$+++ ::It'll take me about 10 minutes to reinstate all your work, so it's certainly not lost at all and it's highly valuable. It's all there in the history section. I agree it can be demoralising work though, anything to do with Cuba can be a real struggle being surrounded by ideologues with agendas - you should try writing on the main page - it's a nightmare, I was accused of bias for writing "Cuba is prone to devastating hurricanes"! Maybe give it a short while and come back to Castro when it's settled down because it sounds like you have a solid, neutral and interesting take on the subject matter. By the way, I've just written this article - [[Ubre Blanca]], feel free to take a look and have a tweak - it's about one of the more bizarre episodes of the Castro era.--[[User:Zleitzen|Zleitzen]] 06:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

515014 +++$+++ ChildofMidnight +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-18 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.240052340E09 +++$+++ GT, when you get a chance could you please userfy [[List of fruits that cannot legally be carried on certain public transport systems]] in my userspace if it isn't too much trouble? Thanks mucho.  +++$+++ GT, when you get a chance could you please userfy [[List of fruits that cannot legally be carried on certain public transport systems]] in my userspace if it isn't too much trouble? Thanks mucho. [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 03:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
515015 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515014 +++$+++ 515014 +++$+++ 2009-04-18 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.240052460E09 +++$+++ Sure. I agree that it's a awesomely hilarious article. What a long way to spell \"durian,\" right? - +++$+++ :Sure. I agree that it's a awesomely hilarious article. What a long way to spell "durian," right? -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 04:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
515016 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515014 +++$+++ 515015 +++$+++ 2009-04-18 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.240052580E09 +++$+++ Ah, it looks like Bigtimepeace beat me to it. - +++$+++ ::Ah, it looks like Bigtimepeace beat me to it. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 04:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
515017 +++$+++ Bigtimepeace +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515014 +++$+++ 515016 +++$+++ 2009-04-18 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.240052700E09 +++$+++ Indeed, sorry to steal your thunder. I deal with all things durian-related here in case you didn't know, though ironically I still have not taken the time to figure out what in the hell a durian is. I like the mystery of it. -- +++$+++ :::Indeed, sorry to steal your thunder. I deal with all things durian-related here in case you didn't know, though ironically I still have not taken the time to figure out what in the hell a durian is. I like the mystery of it. --[[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] |  [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 04:05, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
515018 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515014 +++$+++ 515017 +++$+++ 2009-04-18 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.240053240E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I get similar kicks out of stub sorting. Sometimes, I've got no idea what an article's about, but I can tell it's happening in India. Thus: {{tl|India-stub}}! - +++$+++ ::::Yeah, I get similar kicks out of stub sorting. Sometimes, I've got no idea what an article's about, but I can tell it's happening in India. Thus: {{tl|India-stub}}! -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 04:14, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
515019 +++$+++ ChildofMidnight +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515014 +++$+++ 515018 +++$+++ 2009-04-18 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.240056240E09 +++$+++ Nitey nite GT. In the a.m. can someone clue me in on where the article is?  I'm not seeing it.  Is it like a hidden userpage? Will I get a barnstar if I find it? :)  +++$+++ :::::Nitey nite GT. In the a.m. can someone clue me in on where the article is?  I'm not seeing it.  Is it like a hidden userpage? Will I get a barnstar if I find it? :) [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 05:04, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
515020 +++$+++ Bigtimepeace +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515014 +++$+++ 515019 +++$+++ 2009-04-18 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.240059480E09 +++$+++ I answered on C of M's talk page. -- +++$+++ ::::::I answered on C of M's talk page. --[[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] |  [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 05:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

265276 +++$+++ 172 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-25 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.148574120E09 +++$+++ Nice work on the Castro article. I was pleasantly surprised to see that the article is no longer a terribly disorganized and incoherent mess.  +++$+++ Nice work on the Castro article. I was pleasantly surprised to see that the article is no longer a terribly disorganized and incoherent mess. [[User:172|172]] | [[User talk:172|Talk]] 09:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
265277 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265276 +++$+++ 265276 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.148401320E09 +++$+++ It's a shame really, the Castro article was rapidly becoming a much better article until then it was like a month ago. Teemu Ruskeep\xe4\xe4 shouldn't have deleted all the content without any discussion, but I said that already. Good luck with editing other articles! <strong> +++$+++ :It's a shame really, the Castro article was rapidly becoming a much better article until then it was like a month ago. Teemu Ruskeepää shouldn't have deleted all the content without any discussion, but I said that already. Good luck with editing other articles! <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 09:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

3134 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.312187700E09 +++$+++ There may also be other mentions. I'll know when I go through all the books on Elgar in the reference section of Malvern library this week. Regards, -- +++$+++ There may also be other mentions. I'll know when I go through all the books on Elgar in the reference section of Malvern library this week. Regards, --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 01:35, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
3135 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3134 +++$+++ 3134 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312219440E09 +++$+++ Looking good! If you find a ref in one of the Elgar volumes I shall be mortified that I failed to find it myself!  +++$+++ :Looking good! If you find a ref in one of the Elgar volumes I shall be mortified that I failed to find it myself! [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 10:24, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

3136 +++$+++ Phaeton23 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3136 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.312245780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Phaeton23|Phaeton23]] ([[User talk:Phaeton23|talk]]) 17:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
3137 +++$+++ Phaeton23 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3136 +++$+++ 3136 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.312336680E09 +++$+++ Thanks a million!  +++$+++ *Thanks a million! [[User:Phaeton23|Phaeton23]] ([[User talk:Phaeton23|talk]]) 18:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
3138 +++$+++ Phaeton23 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3136 +++$+++ 3137 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.312503420E09 +++$+++ Haha nonsense, there is nothing to apologize about. I'm sure you are very busy and PR is a voluntary thing, so I can't thank you enough for putting in the time. About the picture, is there a way to upload a photo of him from when he was in his 20s? He is 80+, it seems strange that wiki cant have a photo for recognitions sake. I opened a new PR [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Stephen Sondheim\/archive2]] Many thanks,  +++$+++ **Haha nonsense, there is nothing to apologize about. I'm sure you are very busy and PR is a voluntary thing, so I can't thank you enough for putting in the time. About the picture, is there a way to upload a photo of him from when he was in his 20s? He is 80+, it seems strange that wiki cant have a photo for recognitions sake. I opened a new PR [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Stephen Sondheim/archive2]] Many thanks, [[User:Phaeton23|Phaeton23]] ([[User talk:Phaeton23|talk]]) 17:17, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

3139 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3139 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.312337220E09 +++$+++ Is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Franco_Leoni&action=historysubmit&diff=442666763&oldid=397146503 this right]]?  Best regards, --  +++$+++ Is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Franco_Leoni&action=historysubmit&diff=442666763&oldid=397146503 this right]]?  Best regards, -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 19:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
3140 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3139 +++$+++ 3139 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.312340340E09 +++$+++ Rummaged in the archives and adjusted accordingly. Well spotted!  +++$+++ :Rummaged in the archives and adjusted accordingly. Well spotted! [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 19:59, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

3141 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3141 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.312343940E09 +++$+++ Tim, do you still have JSTOR access? If so, is there any chance you could recover [http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/pss\/1343890|this] and let me have it? I would be most grateful  +++$+++ Tim, do you still have JSTOR access? If so, is there any chance you could recover [http://www.jstor.org/pss/1343890|this] and let me have it? I would be most grateful [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 20:59, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
3142 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3141 +++$+++ 3141 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.312380300E09 +++$+++ Can still get JSTOR articles, but that link won't open for me: can you give me title\/author details?  +++$+++ :Can still get JSTOR articles, but that link won't open for me: can you give me title/author details? [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 07:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
3143 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3141 +++$+++ 3142 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312408920E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I mistyped the url. [http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/pss\/1343890 This] should give you what you need. In case you're worried I am not adding to my private porn collection.  +++$+++ :* Sorry, I mistyped the url. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/1343890 This] should give you what you need. In case you're worried I am not adding to my private porn collection. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 15:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
3144 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3141 +++$+++ 3143 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312409460E09 +++$+++ email now sent to you with the desired info. Enjoy (?)  +++$+++ :**email now sent to you with the desired info. Enjoy (?) [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 15:11, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
3145 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3141 +++$+++ 3144 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.312431900E09 +++$+++ Many thanks. Not pretty stuff, but all will be clear in a week or so.  +++$+++ :***Many thanks. Not pretty stuff, but all will be clear in a week or so. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 21:25, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

3146 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312512300E09 +++$+++ Hallelujah!  Hallelujah! Hallelujah!  And ye shall reign for ever and ever!  --  +++$+++ Hallelujah!  Hallelujah! Hallelujah!  And ye shall reign for ever and ever!  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 19:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
3147 +++$+++ Finetooth +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3146 +++$+++ 3146 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.312517580E09 +++$+++ Congrats from me too. It appeared to me to be an unusually difficult subject to tackle. Very nicely done.  +++$+++ :Congrats from me too. It appeared to me to be an unusually difficult subject to tackle. Very nicely done. [[User:Finetooth|Finetooth]] ([[User talk:Finetooth|talk]]) 21:13, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
3148 +++$+++ Brianboulton +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3146 +++$+++ 3147 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312518120E09 +++$+++ One for the team. Thanks for your contribution.  +++$+++ ::One for the team. Thanks for your contribution. [[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 21:22, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
3149 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3146 +++$+++ 3147 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.312546980E09 +++$+++ The other from the team (and thanks for well worded one), I came to thank you for the great experience! I still feel I took more out of the article than put in, thanks for including me. When I wrote [[Messiah Part II#23|despised and rejected]] I thought not only of the Messiah but also some editors who [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Productive_people_leaving_the_project|left WP]]. I will sing ''Messiah'' in choir (alto) - first time - on September 18. Thanks for an excellent preparation! -- +++$+++ ::The other from the team (and thanks for well worded one), I came to thank you for the great experience! I still feel I took more out of the article than put in, thanks for including me. When I wrote [[Messiah Part II#23|despised and rejected]] I thought not only of the Messiah but also some editors who [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Productive_people_leaving_the_project|left WP]]. I will sing ''Messiah'' in choir (alto) - first time - on September 18. Thanks for an excellent preparation! --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 05:23, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
3150 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3146 +++$+++ 3149 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312587960E09 +++$+++ Let me add my congratulations and thanks here as well. I was busy and only left one note (on Brian's page) but I do appreciate the group effort.  +++$+++ :::Let me add my congratulations and thanks here as well. I was busy and only left one note (on Brian's page) but I do appreciate the group effort. [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 16:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
3151 +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3146 +++$+++ 3150 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.312600620E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your greetings! I must say that under Admiral Boulton's leadership we have made a pretty good shot at it.  +++$+++ ::::Thank you for your greetings! I must say that under Admiral Boulton's leadership we have made a pretty good shot at it. [[User:Tim riley|Tim riley]] ([[User talk:Tim riley#top|talk]]) 20:17, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

527435 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527435 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.165462140E09 +++$+++ One of the signatories to the mediation at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation\/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television)]], {{user5|Yaksha}} is continuing to act in bad faith, by continuing to unilaterally move ''hundreds'' of articles, without consensus or any attempt to proceed through [[WP:RM]]. Do you have any authority to request a block, or to put a \"freeze\" on such moves while the mediation process is on-going?  Or what other action do you recommend?  Multiple attempts to ask Yaksha to stop have not been successful, and I am concerned that unless there is immediate intervention, Yaksha is just going to continue on, moving hundreds more pages, escalating the dispute and further complicating the situation. -- +++$+++ One of the signatories to the mediation at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television)]], {{user5|Yaksha}} is continuing to act in bad faith, by continuing to unilaterally move ''hundreds'' of articles, without consensus or any attempt to proceed through [[WP:RM]]. Do you have any authority to request a block, or to put a "freeze" on such moves while the mediation process is on-going?  Or what other action do you recommend?  Multiple attempts to ask Yaksha to stop have not been successful, and I am concerned that unless there is immediate intervention, Yaksha is just going to continue on, moving hundreds more pages, escalating the dispute and further complicating the situation. --[[User:Elonka|Elonka]] 19:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
527436 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527435 +++$+++ 527435 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.165463100E09 +++$+++ FYI, I have requested a block at [[WP:ANI]], in case you would like to participate: [[WP:ANI#Requesting block for non-consensus page moves]]. -- +++$+++ : FYI, I have requested a block at [[WP:ANI]], in case you would like to participate: [[WP:ANI#Requesting block for non-consensus page moves]]. --[[User:Elonka|Elonka]] 19:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
527437 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527435 +++$+++ 527436 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.165464180E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  :) -- +++$+++ :: Thank you.  :) --[[User:Elonka|Elonka]] 20:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

265292 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265292 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-28 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.148815680E09 +++$+++ What exactly did you have in mind by removing all that info? Do you want it restored? Was it a copyvio or smth? Why did you gut the article? Thx. - <b> +++$+++ What exactly did you have in mind by removing all that info? Do you want it restored? Was it a copyvio or smth? Why did you gut the article? Thx. - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|CrazyRussian]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Crzrussian|contribs]]/[[Special:Emailuser/Crzrussian|email]]</small> 04:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
265293 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265292 +++$+++ 265292 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.149023340E09 +++$+++ Follow [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Citation_templates this] link to view the Citation templates category. When you view each of the templates, just click on the \"discussion\" tab on the top of the article and you'll be able to view the way it's used. Just using those templates will only create inline references, so you'll need to put the template between <nowiki><ref><\/ref><\/nowiki> tags. Place the <nowiki><references\/><\/nowiki> tag where the footnotes need to appear. Have a look at [[Wikipedia:Footnotes]] and other articles which use the system, those might prove useful. Hope that helps! <strong> +++$+++ :Follow [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Citation_templates this] link to view the Citation templates category. When you view each of the templates, just click on the "discussion" tab on the top of the article and you'll be able to view the way it's used. Just using those templates will only create inline references, so you'll need to put the template between <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> tags. Place the <nowiki><references/></nowiki> tag where the footnotes need to appear. Have a look at [[Wikipedia:Footnotes]] and other articles which use the system, those might prove useful. Hope that helps! <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 14:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

265294 +++$+++ Stallions2010 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-31 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.149059040E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for all your help! Much appreciated!  +++$+++ Thanks so much for all your help! Much appreciated! [[User:Stallions2010|Stallions2010]] 00:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
265295 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265294 +++$+++ 265294 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.149103560E09 +++$+++ I depends on the whether it's clear vandalism or not. The owner of the talk page has the freedom to blank his talk page, or archive it. If somebody else deliberately blanks a talkpage, or parts of it, than I think it might be better to revert it. <strong> +++$+++ :I depends on the whether it's clear vandalism or not. The owner of the talk page has the freedom to blank his talk page, or archive it. If somebody else deliberately blanks a talkpage, or parts of it, than I think it might be better to revert it. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 12:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
265296 +++$+++ KarenAnn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265294 +++$+++ 265295 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.149105720E09 +++$+++ It's not vandalism. It's someone who quoted a long message on my talk page (about 31 lines long) in his message to me. Therefore, the same long message (31 or so lines) is on my page twice. Means a lot of scrolling, but maybe that's not excuse enough.  Maybe I could edit it? Like say \"See above message from &&&&& above\" and then leave his message there intact. In other words, remove the long quote from a message that can be seen not far above his on my talk page.  +++$+++ ::It's not vandalism. It's someone who quoted a long message on my talk page (about 31 lines long) in his message to me. Therefore, the same long message (31 or so lines) is on my page twice. Means a lot of scrolling, but maybe that's not excuse enough.  Maybe I could edit it? Like say "See above message from &&&&& above" and then leave his message there intact. In other words, remove the long quote from a message that can be seen not far above his on my talk page. [[User:KarenAnn|KarenAnn]] 13:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
265297 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265294 +++$+++ 265296 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.149106680E09 +++$+++ Ah, if it's your talk page, just edit it any way you want. Just preserve the message in a way that it is still clear to you and the one who messaged you in the first place. But that's not a rule or something, just do as you see fit on your own userpages.<strong> +++$+++ :::Ah, if it's your talk page, just edit it any way you want. Just preserve the message in a way that it is still clear to you and the one who messaged you in the first place. But that's not a rule or something, just do as you see fit on your own userpages.<strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 13:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

3152 +++$+++ Fæ +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.312607760E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, you may be interested in a mass upload at [[:Commons:Category:Sheet Music Lithograph Covers at Boston Public Library]]. These all date from the 1840s to 1870s and feature some interesting popular images of composers and performers. I have around half uploaded at the moment and there should end up being around 150 in total. These would seem perfect for illustrating a few otherwise sparse articles. Cheers  +++$+++ Hi Tim, you may be interested in a mass upload at [[:Commons:Category:Sheet Music Lithograph Covers at Boston Public Library]]. These all date from the 1840s to 1870s and feature some interesting popular images of composers and performers. I have around half uploaded at the moment and there should end up being around 150 in total. These would seem perfect for illustrating a few otherwise sparse articles. Cheers [[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 22:16, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
3153 +++$+++ Fæ +++$+++ Tim riley +++$+++ 3152 +++$+++ 3152 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.312630740E09 +++$+++ The upload completed with 182 images. If you have not tried it before, I recommend switching on cat-a-lot in Commons Preferences \/ Tools for categories. It is very handy for adding extra categories. Cheers  +++$+++ :The upload completed with 182 images. If you have not tried it before, I recommend switching on cat-a-lot in Commons Preferences / Tools for categories. It is very handy for adding extra categories. Cheers [[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 04:39, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

527442 +++$+++ Cuke monster +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-09 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.165680840E09 +++$+++ That's why I blanked the page. I dont even want there to be a record of it...Any way you can remove it?-- +++$+++ That's why I blanked the page. I dont even want there to be a record of it...Any way you can remove it?--[[User:Cuke monster|Cookie]] 08:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
527443 +++$+++ Flcelloguy +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527442 +++$+++ 527442 +++$+++ 2006-12-11 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.165834260E09 +++$+++ Hello, ^demon. I would advise against blanking it and instead leave it as a normal archive, although I think that either way would be acceptable, as long as a statement is placed to look in the history. (I'm not sure if his intention is to not have the page viewable at first, or just not in the records, but if you do decide to keep it blanked, I would recommend at least having a link to the history on the page.) However, I'm inclined to keep the nomination as it is: it will always be in the history, and attempting to hide it wouldn't really achieve anything, in my opinion. We could instead explain to him that if he continues making good contributions, it's unlikely that anyone would bring up a failed nomination here. Thanks!  +++$+++ :Hello, ^demon. I would advise against blanking it and instead leave it as a normal archive, although I think that either way would be acceptable, as long as a statement is placed to look in the history. (I'm not sure if his intention is to not have the page viewable at first, or just not in the records, but if you do decide to keep it blanked, I would recommend at least having a link to the history on the page.) However, I'm inclined to keep the nomination as it is: it will always be in the history, and attempting to hide it wouldn't really achieve anything, in my opinion. We could instead explain to him that if he continues making good contributions, it's unlikely that anyone would bring up a failed nomination here. Thanks! [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] <small>([[User talk:Flcelloguy|A <font color="brown">note?</font>]])</small> 02:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

265299 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265299 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-04 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.149406500E09 +++$+++ Feel free to work on cleaning up the article without our interference, though.  We don't currently have many people within the project that would be interested in the topic, so waiting for us to do it will probably just mean that it'll sit in the cleanup queue indefinitely.  (You can always ask on the project page if there are any obscure military points that come up; but I suspect that, at the level of detail the article uses, there shouldn't be any that would come up from copyediting.)  +++$+++ Feel free to work on cleaning up the article without our interference, though.  We don't currently have many people within the project that would be interested in the topic, so waiting for us to do it will probably just mean that it'll sit in the cleanup queue indefinitely.  (You can always ask on the project page if there are any obscure military points that come up; but I suspect that, at the level of detail the article uses, there shouldn't be any that would come up from copyediting.) [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 00:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
265300 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265299 +++$+++ 265299 +++$+++ 2006-06-04 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.149480000E09 +++$+++ It had a content review fairly recently, so I would just take off the tag and leave it be for now.  Thanks for taking the time to clean it up!  +++$+++ :It had a content review fairly recently, so I would just take off the tag and leave it be for now.  Thanks for taking the time to clean it up! [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 21:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

3157 +++$+++ Add92 +++$+++ Add92 +++$+++ 3157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-05 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.288992000E09 +++$+++ Ah I made a bodge, in 1995\/6 Anglo Italian he played twice scored twice against Foggia and Salernitana.-- +++$+++ Ah I made a bodge, in 1995/6 Anglo Italian he played twice scored twice against Foggia and Salernitana.--[[User:Add92|Add92]] ([[User talk:Add92#top|talk]]) 14:20, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
3158 +++$+++ Struway2 +++$+++ Add92 +++$+++ 3157 +++$+++ 3157 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.289006460E09 +++$+++ Would this now be right? if it is, could you add a ref (book\/page or web). Then one of us can paste those rows into the article. Thanks for taking the trouble,  +++$+++ :Would this now be right? if it is, could you add a ref (book/page or web). Then one of us can paste those rows into the article. Thanks for taking the trouble, [[User:Struway2|Struway2]] ([[User talk:Struway2|talk]]) 18:21, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

527446 +++$+++ ShadowHalo +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-15 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.166253000E09 +++$+++ Ah, thanks for fixing that.  \u2014 +++$+++ Ah, thanks for fixing that.  —[[User:ShadowHalo|ShadowHalo]] 23:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
527447 +++$+++ Ludvikus +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527446 +++$+++ 527446 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.166413800E09 +++$+++ [[Yours truly,]]-- +++$+++ :[[Yours truly,]]--[[User:Ludvikus|Ludvikus]] 19:50, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

3159 +++$+++ Add92 +++$+++ Add92 +++$+++ 3159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-06 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.289068920E09 +++$+++ Lowe, Simon: \"Stoke City The Modern Era - A Complete Record\" (Desert Island Books, ISBN  1874287392).-- +++$+++ Lowe, Simon: "Stoke City The Modern Era - A Complete Record" (Desert Island Books, ISBN  1874287392).--[[User:Add92|Add92]] ([[User talk:Add92#top|talk]]) 11:42, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
3160 +++$+++ Struway2 +++$+++ Add92 +++$+++ 3159 +++$+++ 3159 +++$+++ 2010-11-11 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.289529840E09 +++$+++ Done. thanks,  +++$+++ :Done. thanks, [[User:Struway2|Struway2]] ([[User talk:Struway2|talk]]) 18:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

265306 +++$+++ KarenAnn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265306 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-07 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.149666300E09 +++$+++ So are you saying that you fixed whatever was wrong with it? (It's been a long day.) Just running through your talk page with the limited energy I have left, you seem lawyerly, so I take it the answer is YES. Very interesting case, to me anyway.   +++$+++ So are you saying that you fixed whatever was wrong with it? (It's been a long day.) Just running through your talk page with the limited energy I have left, you seem lawyerly, so I take it the answer is YES. Very interesting case, to me anyway.  [[User:KarenAnn|KarenAnn]] 00:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
265307 +++$+++ KarenAnn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265306 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-07 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.149666900E09 +++$+++ I just looked at the page and it looks very good now. Don't you think the expert tag can be removed? Do you think it needs further work or can it be released?  +++$+++ ::I just looked at the page and it looks very good now. Don't you think the expert tag can be removed? Do you think it needs further work or can it be released? [[User:KarenAnn|KarenAnn]] 00:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
265308 +++$+++ Postdlf +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265306 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-07 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.149678480E09 +++$+++ Yes, I am \"lawyerly,\" : ) but I unfortunately haven't had time to really do more than browse through the opinion.  I'll try to take another look at it tomorrow and see if the article needs any changes beyond expansion.   +++$+++ :::Yes, I am "lawyerly," : ) but I unfortunately haven't had time to really do more than browse through the opinion.  I'll try to take another look at it tomorrow and see if the article needs any changes beyond expansion.  [[User:Postdlf|Postdlf]] 04:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

3163 +++$+++ Add92 +++$+++ Add92 +++$+++ 3163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-15 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.305478440E09 +++$+++ They are included I have just forgot to include these competitions in the into. They are now though thanks-- +++$+++ They are included I have just forgot to include these competitions in the into. They are now though thanks--[[User:Add92|Add92]] ([[User talk:Add92#top|talk]]) 09:54, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
3164 +++$+++ Eldumpo +++$+++ Add92 +++$+++ 3163 +++$+++ 3163 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.305478740E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I wonder if it's worth clarifying in the text before the list which source has generally been used for the entries, as you list two books at the bottom. Do each of them include the same competitions in their statistics?  +++$+++ :Thanks. I wonder if it's worth clarifying in the text before the list which source has generally been used for the entries, as you list two books at the bottom. Do each of them include the same competitions in their statistics? [[User:Eldumpo|Eldumpo]] ([[User talk:Eldumpo|talk]]) 09:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

527452 +++$+++  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-26 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.167189840E09 +++$+++ I live nowhere near New York, only coming up there to visit my family sometimes. Thanks for the offer, though!--<span style=\"font-family:Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ I live nowhere near New York, only coming up there to visit my family sometimes. Thanks for the offer, though!--<span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:CJ_King|<span style="color:red;">C</span>]][[User talk:CJ_King|<span style="color:blue;">J</span>]] [[Wikipedia:Kindness Campaign|<span style="color:#b8860b;">King</span>]]</span> 19:24, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
527453 +++$+++  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527452 +++$+++ 527452 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.167220380E09 +++$+++ I am '''''very''''' sorry, I meant to talk to the person above me. Sorry!!--<span style=\"font-family:Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ :I am '''''very''''' sorry, I meant to talk to the person above me. Sorry!!--<span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:CJ_King|<span style="color:red;">C</span>]][[User talk:CJ_King|<span style="color:blue;">J</span>]] [[Wikipedia:Kindness Campaign|<span style="color:#b8860b;">King</span>]]</span> 03:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

265310 +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-13 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.150242720E09 +++$+++ Hi there!  Re your comment on my Talk page.  My edit to [[Darra, Queensland]] changed the original <nowiki>[[industrial]]<\/nowiki> link, which just points to the disambiguation page, to the more correct <nowiki>[[industry|industrial]]<\/nowiki> - the text of the article still reads \"industrial\", but the link now goes to the [[Industry]] article, as it should.  This, in general, is how the disambiguation process works.  I hope this answers your question!  +++$+++ Hi there!  Re your comment on my Talk page.  My edit to [[Darra, Queensland]] changed the original <nowiki>[[industrial]]</nowiki> link, which just points to the disambiguation page, to the more correct <nowiki>[[industry|industrial]]</nowiki> - the text of the article still reads "industrial", but the link now goes to the [[Industry]] article, as it should.  This, in general, is how the disambiguation process works.  I hope this answers your question! [[User:Tevildo|Tevildo]] 16:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
265311 +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265310 +++$+++ 265310 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.150243500E09 +++$+++ Oh, if your question was just in response to the \"You can help!\" of the edit summary - '''[[WP:DPWL|Click here]]''' if you want to help with the disambig project.  +++$+++ :Oh, if your question was just in response to the "You can help!" of the edit summary - '''[[WP:DPWL|Click here]]''' if you want to help with the disambig project. [[User:Tevildo|Tevildo]] 17:05, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

3169 +++$+++ Pia L +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-21 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.148276280E09 +++$+++ Good job on the Sk\xe5neland article! I noticed that you managed to get that page into the good article category. By the way, it would be great to get some pictures on that page. I am going to contact [http:\/\/www.oresundstid.dk\/dansk\/engelsk\/oresundstid\/arkiv\/arkiv.htm \xd8resundstid] to ask if Wikipedia may use a couple of illustrations from their archives. Please check the pictures out to see which one you think would be the best. I'll let you know what they say. Best,  +++$+++ Good job on the Skåneland article! I noticed that you managed to get that page into the good article category. By the way, it would be great to get some pictures on that page. I am going to contact [http://www.oresundstid.dk/dansk/engelsk/oresundstid/arkiv/arkiv.htm Øresundstid] to ask if Wikipedia may use a couple of illustrations from their archives. Please check the pictures out to see which one you think would be the best. I'll let you know what they say. Best, [[User:Pia L|Pia]] 22:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
3170 +++$+++ Pia L +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3169 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.148295120E09 +++$+++ Ha, ha. :) Yes, Johan, that's a little too much praise for someone who only added a popular culture reference. No offense intended---saw your name on the top of the history page so I figured you were the one who added and updated all that history to the page. Should have checked more carefully. I'll send this message to the person editing just before your pop culture update instead. Best wishes,  +++$+++ ::Ha, ha. :) Yes, Johan, that's a little too much praise for someone who only added a popular culture reference. No offense intended---saw your name on the top of the history page so I figured you were the one who added and updated all that history to the page. Should have checked more carefully. I'll send this message to the person editing just before your pop culture update instead. Best wishes, [[User:Pia L|Pia]] 03:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

265314 +++$+++ KarenAnn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-18 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.150682340E09 +++$+++ I don't know how to access my page to change its name, as someone as redirected it. (I saw that on my Watchlist.)   +++$+++ I don't know how to access my page to change its name, as someone as redirected it. (I saw that on my Watchlist.)  [[User:KarenAnn|KarenAnn]] 18:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
265315 +++$+++ Eugene van der Pijll +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265314 +++$+++ 265314 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.150683240E09 +++$+++ Actually, the page you wrote was [[Out Of Ths World]] (note the missing \"i\"). I've moved it to the more appropriate title [[Out of This World (Johnny Mercer song)]].  +++$+++ :Actually, the page you wrote was [[Out Of Ths World]] (note the missing "i"). I've moved it to the more appropriate title [[Out of This World (Johnny Mercer song)]]. [[User:Eugene van der Pijll|Eugène van der Pijll]] 19:14, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
265316 +++$+++ KarenAnn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265314 +++$+++ 265315 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.150683540E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much! How did you find it? What is the method in a situation like that?   +++$+++ ::Thank you so much! How did you find it? What is the method in a situation like that?  [[User:KarenAnn|KarenAnn]] 19:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
265317 +++$+++ Eugene van der Pijll +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265314 +++$+++ 265316 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.150683900E09 +++$+++ I looked at your contributions (the link to your own contributions is on the top of your screen when you're logged in), and then saw the [[Out Of Ths World]] article, which was at that time a redirect. When you're redirected, there is a notice below the title of the article, saying \"(Redirected from [[Out of this world]])\", for example; if you click that link, you arrive at the redirection page, which you can then edit.  +++$+++ :::I looked at your contributions (the link to your own contributions is on the top of your screen when you're logged in), and then saw the [[Out Of Ths World]] article, which was at that time a redirect. When you're redirected, there is a notice below the title of the article, saying "(Redirected from [[Out of this world]])", for example; if you click that link, you arrive at the redirection page, which you can then edit. [[User:Eugene van der Pijll|Eugène van der Pijll]] 19:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
265318 +++$+++ KarenAnn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265314 +++$+++ 265317 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.150685940E09 +++$+++ When you say the redirection page, do you mean the Disambiguation page? And if I edited that page, how would the Wiki know how to find the renamed page (since I wouldn't be able to get to the page to rename it)? And where is it in the meantime -- it must be on a list somewhere to delete or something? It's all very mysterious.  +++$+++ ::::When you say the redirection page, do you mean the Disambiguation page? And if I edited that page, how would the Wiki know how to find the renamed page (since I wouldn't be able to get to the page to rename it)? And where is it in the meantime -- it must be on a list somewhere to delete or something? It's all very mysterious. [[User:KarenAnn|KarenAnn]] 19:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
265319 +++$+++ Eugene van der Pijll +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265314 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.150686360E09 +++$+++ When I say \"redirection page\", I mean a page such as [[Out of this world]], which redirects to [[Out of This World]]. If you click on the first link, you end up on the second, but with a \"redirection notice\". If you then click on the link in that notice, you arrive at the real [[Out of this world]], which looks like \"#REDIRECT [[Out of This World]]\". You can edit this page to make it a real article, or to change the redirect target. You can find more explanation about redirection pages at [[Wikipedia:Redirect]].  +++$+++ ::::::When I say "redirection page", I mean a page such as [[Out of this world]], which redirects to [[Out of This World]]. If you click on the first link, you end up on the second, but with a "redirection notice". If you then click on the link in that notice, you arrive at the real [[Out of this world]], which looks like "#REDIRECT [[Out of This World]]". You can edit this page to make it a real article, or to change the redirect target. You can find more explanation about redirection pages at [[Wikipedia:Redirect]]. [[User:Eugene van der Pijll|Eugène van der Pijll]] 20:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
265320 +++$+++ KarenAnn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265314 +++$+++ 265318 +++$+++ 2006-06-19 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.150701840E09 +++$+++ Well, none of that seems to work as you say, but thanks for helping me out on this one. One other article a while ago, I really did lose -- it was never found, so I get a little uptight. But thanks! (I have read all that redirect stuff and everything else I can find about the problems, but I guess I'm missing a screw.)   +++$+++ :::::Well, none of that seems to work as you say, but thanks for helping me out on this one. One other article a while ago, I really did lose -- it was never found, so I get a little uptight. But thanks! (I have read all that redirect stuff and everything else I can find about the problems, but I guess I'm missing a screw.)  [[User:KarenAnn|KarenAnn]] 00:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
265321 +++$+++ Daduzi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265314 +++$+++ 265320 +++$+++ 2006-06-19 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.150706460E09 +++$+++ If you click on the \"my contributions\" link in the top right (when you're logged in) you'll be able to see every change you've made to an article and so see what articles you've edited. -- +++$+++ ::::::If you click on the "my contributions" link in the top right (when you're logged in) you'll be able to see every change you've made to an article and so see what articles you've edited. --[[User:Daduzi|<font color="Brown">'''Daduzi'''</font>]] [[User talk:Daduzi|<font color="Green"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 01:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

3172 +++$+++ J Di +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3172 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-30 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.156986360E09 +++$+++ <div style=\"background-color:#F9F9F9; border:1px solid #AAA; padding:5px;\"> [[Image:Information_icon.svg|20px|left]] Hello. Please don't forget to provide an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Thanks, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Editsummary --><\/div>   '''<sub>[[User talk:J Di|talk to]]<\/sub>  +++$+++ <div style="background-color:#F9F9F9; border:1px solid #AAA; padding:5px;"> [[Image:Information_icon.svg|20px|left]] Hello. Please don't forget to provide an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Thanks, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Editsummary --></div>   '''<sub>[[User talk:J Di|talk to]]</sub> [[User:J Di|JD]] <sup>[[Special:Emailuser/J Di|wants e-mail]]</sup>''' 18:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
3173 +++$+++ Wickethewok +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3172 +++$+++ 3172 +++$+++ 2006-09-15 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.158368340E09 +++$+++ Hiya, Johan.  Could you provide some claims of notability and sources for articles regarding [[Lotta & Anders Engbergs Orkester]] and related albums?  As they are presented now, the articles don't make them appear notable and the lack of sources makes the information not reliable at present.  Thanks!   +++$+++ *Hiya, Johan.  Could you provide some claims of notability and sources for articles regarding [[Lotta & Anders Engbergs Orkester]] and related albums?  As they are presented now, the articles don't make them appear notable and the lack of sources makes the information not reliable at present.  Thanks!  [[User:Wickethewok|Wickethewok]] 17:59, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

527461 +++$+++ NinaOdell +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.168849620E09 +++$+++ You're funny.:) +++$+++ You're funny.:)[[User:NinaOdell|NinaOdell]] | [[User talk:NinaOdell|Talk]] 00:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
527462 +++$+++ Can't sleep, clown will eat me +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527461 +++$+++ 527461 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.168918680E09 +++$+++ The warning ladder does not apply when you are clearly being disruptive and making personal attacks.  The edits you referred to by [[Special:Contributions\/199.111.20.34|199.111.20.34]], especially the last ones, are indefensible.  [[WP:RBI]].   +++$+++ : The warning ladder does not apply when you are clearly being disruptive and making personal attacks.  The edits you referred to by [[Special:Contributions/199.111.20.34|199.111.20.34]], especially the last ones, are indefensible.  [[WP:RBI]].  [[User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me|Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me]] 19:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

262673 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-15 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.176644460E09 +++$+++ I put the non-standard headings from your summary chart of current FAs at [[User:SandyGeorgia\/MEDMOS Sections]]; maybe we can figure out if any adjustments can be made to our headings to accomodate these?  There were other non-standard headings, but I either fixed them, or know they can't be fixed (Asperger). We can use the talk page there; should I ask Tim Vickers to help, since a couple of those are his and he may have ideas?   +++$+++ I put the non-standard headings from your summary chart of current FAs at [[User:SandyGeorgia/MEDMOS Sections]]; maybe we can figure out if any adjustments can be made to our headings to accomodate these?  There were other non-standard headings, but I either fixed them, or know they can't be fixed (Asperger). We can use the talk page there; should I ask Tim Vickers to help, since a couple of those are his and he may have ideas?  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 06:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
262674 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262673 +++$+++ 262673 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.176938160E09 +++$+++ Colin, besides being [[Nor'easter|swamped,]] I have to travel this weekend, so won't be much help until the middle of next week.  Are we ready to move to the next step?  If so, what would that next step be?  We need to generate more consensus. Did you see that list I posted (above)?  +++$+++ :Colin, besides being [[Nor'easter|swamped,]] I have to travel this weekend, so won't be much help until the middle of next week.  Are we ready to move to the next step?  If so, what would that next step be?  We need to generate more consensus. Did you see that list I posted (above)? [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
262675 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262673 +++$+++ 262674 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.176951840E09 +++$+++ Not terribly grim&mdash;it could be worse.  It's just a major irritation, and costly.  So, I guess it won't hurt to sit tight for a week, and see what happens?  I'll be home next Tuesday, and will follow what I can on my slow laptop connection.  Best,  +++$+++ ::Not terribly grim&mdash;it could be worse.  It's just a major irritation, and costly.  So, I guess it won't hurt to sit tight for a week, and see what happens?  I'll be home next Tuesday, and will follow what I can on my slow laptop connection.  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

523848 +++$+++ Racky pt +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 523848 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-23 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.179923940E09 +++$+++ optional: go through deleted talk page there in that article to see how sedan is not orrange. +++$+++ optional: go through deleted talk page there in that article to see how sedan is not orrange.[[User:Racky pt|Racky pt]] 05:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
523849 +++$+++ Racky pt +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 523848 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-04 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.180962600E09 +++$+++ i would be thankful if you could post wikitext of deleted article in my talk page(making new section). regards  +++$+++ ::i would be thankful if you could post wikitext of deleted article in my talk page(making new section). regards [[User:Racky pt|Racky pt]] 06:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

506390 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-05 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.294228200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the invite, but my plate is full.  BTW, I would not use WP:Biography as an example of a good project.  IMO, it suffers from being overly large and seems to be unable to do anything much besides tag articles with its tag.  I suggest that you focus your activities very narrowly and don't go putting a project tag on hundreds of thousands of articles that the project will not maintain.  --  +++$+++ Thanks for the invite, but my plate is full.  BTW, I would not use WP:Biography as an example of a good project.  IMO, it suffers from being overly large and seems to be unable to do anything much besides tag articles with its tag.  I suggest that you focus your activities very narrowly and don't go putting a project tag on hundreds of thousands of articles that the project will not maintain.  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 03:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
506391 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506390 +++$+++ 506390 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.294228320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the advice and I hope you find the time at some point in the future. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the advice and I hope you find the time at some point in the future. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 03:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
506392 +++$+++ EraserGirl +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506390 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.294280940E09 +++$+++ Indeed, Ssilvers is correct a more NARROW focus would be more successful, once certainly can't tag everything on WP with this project tag just because it falls within the US aegis. There is no way any one small group can do much for a project so big.  Did you have any specific thing in mind when you started the invites?  +++$+++ :::Indeed, Ssilvers is correct a more NARROW focus would be more successful, once certainly can't tag everything on WP with this project tag just because it falls within the US aegis. There is no way any one small group can do much for a project so big.  Did you have any specific thing in mind when you started the invites? [[User:EraserGirl|EraserGirl]] ([[User talk:EraserGirl|talk]]) 18:29, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

3180 +++$+++ Miller17CU94 +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-17 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.171773780E09 +++$+++ This is a reminder to use the edit summaries. I like what you did both for the [[FIS Nordic World Ski Championships]] and the [[FIS Nordic World Ski Championships 2007]], but please remember to put down what you did. Thank you.  +++$+++ This is a reminder to use the edit summaries. I like what you did both for the [[FIS Nordic World Ski Championships]] and the [[FIS Nordic World Ski Championships 2007]], but please remember to put down what you did. Thank you. [[User:Miller17CU94|Chris]] 20:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
3181 +++$+++ Miller17CU94 +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3180 +++$+++ 3180 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.172367960E09 +++$+++ Reminder #2. I like what you are doing on addin the Swedish iw to the nordic skiing article, but please remember to add edit summaries to your articles.  +++$+++ :Reminder #2. I like what you are doing on addin the Swedish iw to the nordic skiing article, but please remember to add edit summaries to your articles. [[User:Miller17CU94|Chris]] 17:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

265325 +++$+++ KarenAnn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265325 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-22 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.151040900E09 +++$+++ Is there a list of categories somewhere?     +++$+++ Is there a list of categories somewhere?    [[User:KarenAnn|KarenAnn]] 22:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
265326 +++$+++ GeorgeMoney +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265325 +++$+++ 265325 +++$+++ 2006-06-22 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.151041560E09 +++$+++ There is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3AAllpages&from=&namespace=14] if you want a list of all categories, but the best way to do it is to find a very general category and navigate your way down to more specific subcategories. For example, if you wanted to find [[:Category:Former Wikipedians]], you would go from [[:Category:Wikipedians]] &rarr; [[:Category:Wikipedians by Wikipedia status]] &rarr; [[:Category:Users not currently active]]&rarr; [[:Category:Former Wikipedians]]  --<font size=\"1\" color=\"002bb8\"> +++$+++ :There is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AAllpages&from=&namespace=14] if you want a list of all categories, but the best way to do it is to find a very general category and navigate your way down to more specific subcategories. For example, if you wanted to find [[:Category:Former Wikipedians]], you would go from [[:Category:Wikipedians]] &rarr; [[:Category:Wikipedians by Wikipedia status]] &rarr; [[:Category:Users not currently active]]&rarr; [[:Category:Former Wikipedians]]  --<font size="1" color="002bb8">[[User:GeorgeMoney|GeorgeMoney]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:GeorgeMoney|T]]&middot;[[Special:Contributions/GeorgeMoney|C]]</sup></font> 22:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

3183 +++$+++ Miller17CU94 +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-04 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.173072540E09 +++$+++ I saw you put in information that Sergej Sjirjajev had tested positive for doping in the [[FIS Nordic World Ski Championships 2007]]. Can you please verify this with information if this was done before or during the event because I will remove this information if you cannot. Thank you.  +++$+++ I saw you put in information that Sergej Sjirjajev had tested positive for doping in the [[FIS Nordic World Ski Championships 2007]]. Can you please verify this with information if this was done before or during the event because I will remove this information if you cannot. Thank you. [[User:Miller17CU94|Chris]] 21:29, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
3184 +++$+++ Miller17CU94 +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3183 +++$+++ 3183 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.173075540E09 +++$+++ I found the information. Nevermind. Sorry about that.  +++$+++ :I found the information. Nevermind. Sorry about that. [[User:Miller17CU94|Chris]] 22:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

265331 +++$+++ Zleitzen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-25 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.151270940E09 +++$+++ There is also general pattern to these pages - a relatively harmonious editing pool is disrupted by [[User:CJK|users]] more interested in asserting or retaining a political agenda within Wikipedia. These users are less interested or knowledgeable about Cuba or Castro than they are keen to assert broader individual beliefs. Thus efforts are made by others to neutralize this - and a period of chaos ensues. The last thing anyone needs is a dispute with a user over the talk page itself! Hopefully it should be over very shortly! Keep up the good work.-- +++$+++ There is also general pattern to these pages - a relatively harmonious editing pool is disrupted by [[User:CJK|users]] more interested in asserting or retaining a political agenda within Wikipedia. These users are less interested or knowledgeable about Cuba or Castro than they are keen to assert broader individual beliefs. Thus efforts are made by others to neutralize this - and a period of chaos ensues. The last thing anyone needs is a dispute with a user over the talk page itself! Hopefully it should be over very shortly! Keep up the good work.--[[User:Zleitzen|Zleitzen]] 14:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
265332 +++$+++ BruceHallman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265331 +++$+++ 265331 +++$+++ 2006-06-25 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.151302680E09 +++$+++ KarenAnn, I find it upsetting when one editor threatens another editor, and I find it even more upsetting that the Wikipedia community does not function well and tolerates threatening behaviour.  Regardless, editors have the option to vote in 'straw polls' anonymously by 'logging out' so that the only identification is their IP address.   +++$+++ :KarenAnn, I find it upsetting when one editor threatens another editor, and I find it even more upsetting that the Wikipedia community does not function well and tolerates threatening behaviour.  Regardless, editors have the option to vote in 'straw polls' anonymously by 'logging out' so that the only identification is their IP address.  [[User:BruceHallman|BruceHallman]] 23:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

265333 +++$+++ John FitzGerald +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-26 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.151357580E09 +++$+++ The problem with [[Reinforcement]] is that people keep butchering the article. I hadn't looked at it for a while until your comment turned up on my watchlist, and I was shocked at how the article has been eviscerated. In at least two versions of the page there were complete descriptions of reinforcement schedules. Unless you can suggest some way in which the article could be protected I ain't touching it any more.  +++$+++ The problem with [[Reinforcement]] is that people keep butchering the article. I hadn't looked at it for a while until your comment turned up on my watchlist, and I was shocked at how the article has been eviscerated. In at least two versions of the page there were complete descriptions of reinforcement schedules. Unless you can suggest some way in which the article could be protected I ain't touching it any more. [[User:John FitzGerald|John FitzGerald]] 14:33, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
265334 +++$+++ John FitzGerald +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265333 +++$+++ 265333 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.151392380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply. I hadn't thought the remark was directed at me. It's just that this sort of article history seems to be a serious problem here. But maybe I'll work on my patience and then try to fix it up.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the reply. I hadn't thought the remark was directed at me. It's just that this sort of article history seems to be a serious problem here. But maybe I'll work on my patience and then try to fix it up. [[User:John FitzGerald|John FitzGerald]] 00:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

265335 +++$+++ Paolo Liberatore +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265335 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-27 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.151454420E09 +++$+++ Hi. You haven't completed the AfD nomination of [[Kunio Okawara]]. If you would like to complete it, please follow the other two steps of [[Template:AfD in 3 steps]] ( +++$+++ Hi. You haven't completed the AfD nomination of [[Kunio Okawara]]. If you would like to complete it, please follow the other two steps of [[Template:AfD in 3 steps]] ([[User:Paolo Liberatore|Liberatore]], [[User talk:Paolo Liberatore|2006]]). 17:27, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
265336 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265335 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.151475960E09 +++$+++ Exactly. However, the peer review process page explains that this is only intended for good articles that are likely to become featured articles. So I'm not sure if that's the right procedure for [[Fidel Castro]]. But we could ask some of the common editors on the Castro page, see what they think about it. <strong> +++$+++ :::Exactly. However, the peer review process page explains that this is only intended for good articles that are likely to become featured articles. So I'm not sure if that's the right procedure for [[Fidel Castro]]. But we could ask some of the common editors on the Castro page, see what they think about it. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 23:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
265337 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265335 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.151476620E09 +++$+++ I believe they will yes. Let's wait a while then until things settle down. <strong> +++$+++ :::::I believe they will yes. Let's wait a while then until things settle down. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 23:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
265338 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265335 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-28 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.151560680E09 +++$+++ Apart from citing reliable sources there are some other criteria the article fails to meet. Some parts aren't very neutral, some parts have too much irrelevant information in them which could as well in other articles. And I believe some will find the article too long. I had a look at some other somewhat unlikely featured articles. If you look at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith\/archive1|The nomination]] and [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith\/archive2|peer review]] of the article about Star Wars 3 a few users did some of the cutting down and re-editting whilst the nomination was in progress. So it can be done. Shall I propose a request for peer review on the Castro talk page? I think the whole discussion tree debate with Teemu has cooled down now... <strong> +++$+++ ::::::Apart from citing reliable sources there are some other criteria the article fails to meet. Some parts aren't very neutral, some parts have too much irrelevant information in them which could as well in other articles. And I believe some will find the article too long. I had a look at some other somewhat unlikely featured articles. If you look at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith/archive1|The nomination]] and [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith/archive2|peer review]] of the article about Star Wars 3 a few users did some of the cutting down and re-editting whilst the nomination was in progress. So it can be done. Shall I propose a request for peer review on the Castro talk page? I think the whole discussion tree debate with Teemu has cooled down now... <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 22:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
265339 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265335 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-29 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.151607720E09 +++$+++ I left a reply on Zleitzen's talk page. ;) <strong> +++$+++ :::::::I left a reply on Zleitzen's talk page. ;) <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 12:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

568511 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568511 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-02 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.151907480E09 +++$+++ I see that you asked a question about deleting the AfD tag but that no answer was forthcoming in the AfD debate.  A good place to ask questions about policy and procedures is the [[Wikipedia:Village pump|village pump]], where advice will be offered at short notice.  You make a good point about the removal of tags before the five day limit not being explicit, so I will see to it that this is made clear in the process. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #800080;\"> +++$+++ I see that you asked a question about deleting the AfD tag but that no answer was forthcoming in the AfD debate.  A good place to ask questions about policy and procedures is the [[Wikipedia:Village pump|village pump]], where advice will be offered at short notice.  You make a good point about the removal of tags before the five day limit not being explicit, so I will see to it that this is made clear in the process. <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background: #800080" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Ariel" color="#800080">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 23:18, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
568512 +++$+++ Reswobslc +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568511 +++$+++ 568511 +++$+++ 2006-07-02 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.151908500E09 +++$+++ You may have touched on a good point that's highly relevant to the AfD debate you're referring to, though I am not sure if you're talking about the specific case of one removing his own AfD tag.  That is because the notice you've quoted is talking about if someone else AfD's an article you wrote, not if you're the person who AfD'd someone else's article and then said whoops and changed your mind, and appears to be of low relevance to the mistake I made.  The AfD template clearly says on it, \"please don't remove this until the discussion is over\".  But a little bit of selective interpretation applies when one considers removing the AfD tag shortly after he placed it there himself.  Just like we all know a red light means stop, but if the light is broken and never turns green, it doesn't mean sit there and run out of gas hoping it eventually does.  Certainly I will think harder and review more carefully before nominating an AfD thus eliminating the need to quickly rescind one, and this should never happen again to me now that I know, but I respond simply to draw attention to the fact that the rule is unclear or undefined in the first place and is likely to trip up other newbies as long as it stays that way.  +++$+++ :You may have touched on a good point that's highly relevant to the AfD debate you're referring to, though I am not sure if you're talking about the specific case of one removing his own AfD tag.  That is because the notice you've quoted is talking about if someone else AfD's an article you wrote, not if you're the person who AfD'd someone else's article and then said whoops and changed your mind, and appears to be of low relevance to the mistake I made.  The AfD template clearly says on it, "please don't remove this until the discussion is over".  But a little bit of selective interpretation applies when one considers removing the AfD tag shortly after he placed it there himself.  Just like we all know a red light means stop, but if the light is broken and never turns green, it doesn't mean sit there and run out of gas hoping it eventually does.  Certainly I will think harder and review more carefully before nominating an AfD thus eliminating the need to quickly rescind one, and this should never happen again to me now that I know, but I respond simply to draw attention to the fact that the rule is unclear or undefined in the first place and is likely to trip up other newbies as long as it stays that way. [[User:Reswobslc|Reswobslc]] 23:35, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

527484 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.171695420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know, Chad.  +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know, Chad. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 22:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
527485 +++$+++ MPerel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527484 +++$+++ 527484 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.171800300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know also. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know also. --[[User:MPerel|<font color="#330000">M</font><font color="#334400">P</font><font color="#338800">er</font><font color="#33cc00">el </font>]]<sup><small>( [[user_talk:MPerel|<font color="#11bb00">talk</font>]] | [[Special:contributions/MPerel|<font color="3399FF">contrib</font>]])</small></sup> 04:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

265343 +++$+++ Matticus78 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.152316740E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you were placing this article into Articles for Deletion, but you haven't completed the AfD rationale (step 2), by adding your justification to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Identify software|this page]]. Without doing this critical step, the article and your reasons for nominating it won't appear on the log page. Are you still working on it? In any case, I'd recommend you write your justification before adding the <nowiki>{{subst:afd3}}<\/nowiki> tag to the log, otherwise it just puts up a redlink and messes up the formatting. ~  +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you were placing this article into Articles for Deletion, but you haven't completed the AfD rationale (step 2), by adding your justification to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identify software|this page]]. Without doing this critical step, the article and your reasons for nominating it won't appear on the log page. Are you still working on it? In any case, I'd recommend you write your justification before adding the <nowiki>{{subst:afd3}}</nowiki> tag to the log, otherwise it just puts up a redlink and messes up the formatting. ~ [[User:Matticus78|Matticus78]] 16:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
265344 +++$+++ Matticus78 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265343 +++$+++ 265343 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.152319320E09 +++$+++ Yes, you've basically got it right. Let me just quickly sum up the process for you, so you can refer to it again later here if necessary. First you place <nowiki>{{subst:afd1}}<\/nowiki> on the page you're nominating. This puts the \"Nominated for deletion\" box on the page. Then you click the red link in that box to go to that article's nomination rationale (it won't exist yet, so you're creating it) and add the tag <nowiki>{{subst:afd2 | pg=Page Name | text=Your explanation}}<\/nowiki> to it, plus four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>) to sign the page. Then you go that day's AfD log (again, there is a link in the box on the page of the article you're nominating) and add the final <nowiki>{{subst:afd3 | pg=Page Name}}<\/nowiki> tag, which automatically lists it and any changes made to the justification page (like other people's votes and comments) get updated on the log page automatically. The steps have to be followed in that order, or you get strange things happening. It's a little convoluted, I know - probably one of the most complicated things a normal Wikipedian is likely to do - but there are always people on the lookout for anyone who slips up. I should know - I did my first AfD nomination a couple of weeks ago and made the exact same mistake you did, and someone else spotted it, checked my edit history (as I did yours) and pointed me in the right direction. I'm just paying the good deed forward. Anyway, keep up the sterling work you've been doing so far on Wikipedia! ~  +++$+++ :Yes, you've basically got it right. Let me just quickly sum up the process for you, so you can refer to it again later here if necessary. First you place <nowiki>{{subst:afd1}}</nowiki> on the page you're nominating. This puts the "Nominated for deletion" box on the page. Then you click the red link in that box to go to that article's nomination rationale (it won't exist yet, so you're creating it) and add the tag <nowiki>{{subst:afd2 | pg=Page Name | text=Your explanation}}</nowiki> to it, plus four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) to sign the page. Then you go that day's AfD log (again, there is a link in the box on the page of the article you're nominating) and add the final <nowiki>{{subst:afd3 | pg=Page Name}}</nowiki> tag, which automatically lists it and any changes made to the justification page (like other people's votes and comments) get updated on the log page automatically. The steps have to be followed in that order, or you get strange things happening. It's a little convoluted, I know - probably one of the most complicated things a normal Wikipedian is likely to do - but there are always people on the lookout for anyone who slips up. I should know - I did my first AfD nomination a couple of weeks ago and made the exact same mistake you did, and someone else spotted it, checked my edit history (as I did yours) and pointed me in the right direction. I'm just paying the good deed forward. Anyway, keep up the sterling work you've been doing so far on Wikipedia! ~ [[User:Matticus78|Matticus78]] 17:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

587566 +++$+++ Chowbok +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ 587566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-04 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.162691580E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class=\"plainlinks\">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target={{PAGENAMEE}}&namespace=6}} this link]<\/span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. --  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target={{PAGENAMEE}}&namespace=6}} this link]</span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. -- [[User:Chowbok|Chowbok]] 17:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
587567 +++$+++ Chowbok +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ 587566 +++$+++ 587566 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.163898060E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Walt Harris-Stanford.jpeg]] &mdash; +++$+++ *[[:Image:Walt Harris-Stanford.jpeg]] &mdash;[[User:Chowbok|<span style="background:black; color:white; font-weight: bold;">Chowbok</span>]] [[User talk:Chowbok|<span style="color:black;">☠</span>]] 17:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
587568 +++$+++ Chowbok +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ 587566 +++$+++ 587566 +++$+++ 2006-11-19 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.163942280E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Watson Brown.jpg]] &mdash; +++$+++ *[[:Image:Watson Brown.jpg]] &mdash;[[User:Chowbok|<span style="background:black; color:white; font-weight: bold;">Chowbok</span>]] [[User talk:Chowbok|<span style="color:black;">☠</span>]] 05:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
587569 +++$+++ Chowbok +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ 587566 +++$+++ 587566 +++$+++ 2006-11-22 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.164256260E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Westtommy-memphis.jpg]] &mdash; +++$+++ *[[:Image:Westtommy-memphis.jpg]] &mdash;[[User:Chowbok|<span style="background:black; color:white; font-weight: bold;">Chowbok</span>]] [[User talk:Chowbok|<span style="color:black;">☠</span>]] 20:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
587570 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ 587566 +++$+++ 587566 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.163661480E09 +++$+++ Thank you for consolidating these. Please sign after each image if you add any more. Thank you. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for consolidating these. Please sign after each image if you add any more. Thank you. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 23:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

265345 +++$+++ Matticus78 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265345 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.152323340E09 +++$+++ Looks like the problem was simple typo. You entered \"Artiles\" instead of \"Articles\". I've fixed it already. ~  +++$+++ Looks like the problem was simple typo. You entered "Artiles" instead of "Articles". I've fixed it already. ~ [[User:Matticus78|Matticus78]] 18:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
265346 +++$+++ Matticus78 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265345 +++$+++ 265345 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.152323520E09 +++$+++ Oh, I also noticed the Pjotro nomination page wasn't formatted correctly - without the title thing it won't show up properly on the day's AfD log, and will appear to be stuck onto the bottom of the nomination above it! I'll fix that too momentarily. Remember, using the three AfD tags is much easier than entering the data manually (although both are acceptable ways of doing it, the former is quicker and less prone to typos breaking stuff). Apparently there are some tools for making the AfD nomination process a little smoother, but I haven't looked into it yet. If I find anything useful out, I'll let you know. ~  +++$+++ :Oh, I also noticed the Pjotro nomination page wasn't formatted correctly - without the title thing it won't show up properly on the day's AfD log, and will appear to be stuck onto the bottom of the nomination above it! I'll fix that too momentarily. Remember, using the three AfD tags is much easier than entering the data manually (although both are acceptable ways of doing it, the former is quicker and less prone to typos breaking stuff). Apparently there are some tools for making the AfD nomination process a little smoother, but I haven't looked into it yet. If I find anything useful out, I'll let you know. ~ [[User:Matticus78|Matticus78]] 18:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
265347 +++$+++ Matticus78 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265345 +++$+++ 265346 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.152326340E09 +++$+++ Also, it's a good idea to familiarise yourself with the three different deletion levels: [[WP:CSD|Speedy]] for very obviously untenable articles (complete nonsense, ordinary people just writing about themselves, insulting articles, etc.); [[WP:PROD|Prodding]] (short for '''Pro'''posed '''D'''eletion]] for uncontroversial deletes (like blatant advertising, hoaxes, crystal balling, etc.); and of course [[WP:AFD|AfD]] where the article is questionable but open to debate, or where a \"Prod\" is done first but later removed by someone else. What I've learned from watching the newly-created articles list is, when confronted with a suspect article, check if it's a candidate for Speedy Deletion first, then if it fails that, consider Prodding it, and if the Prod gets removed or you think it should be discussed first, only then should it go to AfD. It takes a little time to learn how judge a good level for Speedy, Prod or AfD, but I'm sure you'll soon get a feel for it. ~  +++$+++ ::Also, it's a good idea to familiarise yourself with the three different deletion levels: [[WP:CSD|Speedy]] for very obviously untenable articles (complete nonsense, ordinary people just writing about themselves, insulting articles, etc.); [[WP:PROD|Prodding]] (short for '''Pro'''posed '''D'''eletion]] for uncontroversial deletes (like blatant advertising, hoaxes, crystal balling, etc.); and of course [[WP:AFD|AfD]] where the article is questionable but open to debate, or where a "Prod" is done first but later removed by someone else. What I've learned from watching the newly-created articles list is, when confronted with a suspect article, check if it's a candidate for Speedy Deletion first, then if it fails that, consider Prodding it, and if the Prod gets removed or you think it should be discussed first, only then should it go to AfD. It takes a little time to learn how judge a good level for Speedy, Prod or AfD, but I'm sure you'll soon get a feel for it. ~ [[User:Matticus78|Matticus78]] 19:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

527491 +++$+++ Doug Bell +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-05 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.173087000E09 +++$+++ I didn't want to reply to your comment on Essjay's talk page because I felt it deserved to stand by itself unmolested.  I just wanted to say that on more than one occassion over the last few days I've thought about that quote of Essjay's and have wished he'd simply followed his own advice.  Cheers, \u2014 +++$+++ I didn't want to reply to your comment on Essjay's talk page because I felt it deserved to stand by itself unmolested.  I just wanted to say that on more than one occassion over the last few days I've thought about that quote of Essjay's and have wished he'd simply followed his own advice.  Cheers, —[[User:Doug Bell|Doug&nbsp;Bell]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Doug Bell|talk]]</sup> 01:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
527492 +++$+++ Doug Bell +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527491 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-05 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.173094140E09 +++$+++ Probably so, although there is often a contradiction between \"better\", \"happier\" and \"more firendly\".  Sometimes, the process of making something better does not make it happier, and vice versa\u2014particularly when considered only in the short term.  While the Essjay affair has certainly done nothing to make Wikipedia happier or more friendly, at least not today, I do hope it has served to make it better, at least for tomorrow. \u2014 +++$+++ ::Probably so, although there is often a contradiction between "better", "happier" and "more firendly".  Sometimes, the process of making something better does not make it happier, and vice versa—particularly when considered only in the short term.  While the Essjay affair has certainly done nothing to make Wikipedia happier or more friendly, at least not today, I do hope it has served to make it better, at least for tomorrow. —[[User:Doug Bell|Doug&nbsp;Bell]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Doug Bell|talk]]</sup> 03:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

265348 +++$+++ Zleitzen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.152337380E09 +++$+++ Hi KarenAnn. I wrote the above article a while ago (still unfinished pending further input from other contibutors as I haven't the patience to do it all myself). I've lost track of some of the stuff I used as reference, and I'm now trying to reference the thing. But I'm not very good at that side, how to format footnotes etc. Could you have a look at it please. Your help would be much appreciated.-- +++$+++ Hi KarenAnn. I wrote the above article a while ago (still unfinished pending further input from other contibutors as I haven't the patience to do it all myself). I've lost track of some of the stuff I used as reference, and I'm now trying to reference the thing. But I'm not very good at that side, how to format footnotes etc. Could you have a look at it please. Your help would be much appreciated.--[[User:Zleitzen|Zleitzen]] 22:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
265349 +++$+++ Zleitzen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265348 +++$+++ 265348 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.152341040E09 +++$+++ I'm just asking about footnotes and referencing - technical matters, KarenAnn as I don't know how to do it and I'm usless with computers. I only know how to do external links references. I wrote the whole article as it is now some time ago, based largely on what I knew - combining a few pieces of precise info taken from internet sources - with the exeption of the recent relations area which I've left to others to compile.-- +++$+++ :I'm just asking about footnotes and referencing - technical matters, KarenAnn as I don't know how to do it and I'm usless with computers. I only know how to do external links references. I wrote the whole article as it is now some time ago, based largely on what I knew - combining a few pieces of precise info taken from internet sources - with the exeption of the recent relations area which I've left to others to compile.--[[User:Zleitzen|Zleitzen]] 23:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
265350 +++$+++ Zleitzen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265348 +++$+++ 265349 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.152341580E09 +++$+++ Thanks Karen Ann, I'll take a look at what you've done and try to replicate it for future sourcing styles on articles.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks Karen Ann, I'll take a look at what you've done and try to replicate it for future sourcing styles on articles.--[[User:Zleitzen|Zleitzen]] 23:53, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

527493 +++$+++ Xaosflux +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-06 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.173174480E09 +++$+++ I've '''temporarily''' unblocked this bot account, as your statement suggests that the project is being adversley affected by this block.  We can not have bot's running without accountable operators though.  I plan on reblocking this bot in 10 days if an owner is not established as having control of the account.  This can be done by having the bot log in and edit it's page to reflect the new operator.  (Or the old operator can return).  [[User:Essjay|Essjay]] specificaly stated that his bots \"will no longer be running.\" and  \"My tools will be taken down shortly\" so this unblocking may not start the bot back up.  We have been speedily approving activation or trials of bots to replace Essjay's bot at [[WP:RFBOT]], you may request a new bot there.  Let me know if you have any other needs.  Thank you, \u2014  +++$+++ I've '''temporarily''' unblocked this bot account, as your statement suggests that the project is being adversley affected by this block.  We can not have bot's running without accountable operators though.  I plan on reblocking this bot in 10 days if an owner is not established as having control of the account.  This can be done by having the bot log in and edit it's page to reflect the new operator.  (Or the old operator can return).  [[User:Essjay|Essjay]] specificaly stated that his bots "will no longer be running." and  "My tools will be taken down shortly" so this unblocking may not start the bot back up.  We have been speedily approving activation or trials of bots to replace Essjay's bot at [[WP:RFBOT]], you may request a new bot there.  Let me know if you have any other needs.  Thank you, — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 01:48, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
527494 +++$+++ Xaosflux +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527493 +++$+++ 527493 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.173175020E09 +++$+++ OK, then I'm reblocking the old account.  See my note at [[Wikipedia:Bots\/Requests for approval\/MediationBot1]] though, about gettnig the old name. \u2014  +++$+++ :OK, then I'm reblocking the old account.  See my note at [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MediationBot1]] though, about gettnig the old name. — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 01:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

265352 +++$+++ KarenAnn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265352 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-08 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.152343080E09 +++$+++ Could you tell me which particular article you are referring to -- has I have done hundreds of tagging in the wikify backlog in the last few days and I have already been using the source you referred me to? As far as I know, I have never substituted a tag. In fact, I don't know quite what you mean.  +++$+++ Could you tell me which particular article you are referring to -- has I have done hundreds of tagging in the wikify backlog in the last few days and I have already been using the source you referred me to? As far as I know, I have never substituted a tag. In fact, I don't know quite what you mean. [[User:KarenAnn|KarenAnn]] 00:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
265353 +++$+++ Alphachimp +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265352 +++$+++ 265352 +++$+++ 2006-07-08 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.152387060E09 +++$+++ Nah. The message is somewhat of a generic one. You didn't subst a cleanup tag, but you used a badly formed one. Check it out [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Latin_Trade&diff=62252514&oldid=52370808 here]. I have a bot that changes <nowiki>{{cleanup}}<\/nowiki> to the month-specific tags, but tags spelled wrong or subst'ed sort of screw it up. So yeah, thanks for your contributions. You got my generic message, and I hope that I didn't offend you. Hope that answers your question. Regards,  +++$+++ :Nah. The message is somewhat of a generic one. You didn't subst a cleanup tag, but you used a badly formed one. Check it out [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latin_Trade&diff=62252514&oldid=52370808 here]. I have a bot that changes <nowiki>{{cleanup}}</nowiki> to the month-specific tags, but tags spelled wrong or subst'ed sort of screw it up. So yeah, thanks for your contributions. You got my generic message, and I hope that I didn't offend you. Hope that answers your question. Regards, [[User:Alphachimp|<font color="Maroon">'''Alphachimp'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alphachimp|'''<font color="Blue">talk</font>''']]</sup> 12:31, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

3211 +++$+++ Sottolacqua +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-13 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.279086420E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, your opinion contrasts with the acceptable norm for categorizing films by decade on Wikipedia. Look at <nowiki>[[Category:Films set in 1973]]<\/nowiki> and <nowiki>[[Category:Films set in 1875]]<\/nowiki>; no articles are in these categories. Please follow the accepted norm when categorizing films by decade.  +++$+++ Unfortunately, your opinion contrasts with the acceptable norm for categorizing films by decade on Wikipedia. Look at <nowiki>[[Category:Films set in 1973]]</nowiki> and <nowiki>[[Category:Films set in 1875]]</nowiki>; no articles are in these categories. Please follow the accepted norm when categorizing films by decade. [[User:Sottolacqua|Sottolacqua]] ([[User talk:Sottolacqua|talk]]) 22:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
3212 +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-13 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.279087200E09 +++$+++ OK, but I think we should change that for films mainly set in one or maybe two single years.  +++$+++ ::OK, but I think we should change that for films mainly set in one or maybe two single years. [[User:J 1982|J 1982]] ([[User talk:J 1982#top|talk]]) 23:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

3213 +++$+++ JasonAQuest +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-12 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.284329700E09 +++$+++ Have you discussed these \"fictional characters debuts\" categories with anyone else?  I'm not sure they're really of value, but also the name seems grammatically awkward.  You really should build consensus around a better term before putting any more work into this (if at all). - +++$+++ Have you discussed these "fictional characters debuts" categories with anyone else?  I'm not sure they're really of value, but also the name seems grammatically awkward.  You really should build consensus around a better term before putting any more work into this (if at all). -[[User:JasonAQuest|Jason A. Quest]] ([[User talk:JasonAQuest|talk]]) 15:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
3214 +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3213 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.284329820E09 +++$+++ I didn't start them, we already have [[:Category:Fictional characters introduced in 1992]] (we need a standard). And yes, not all fictional characters begin as comic book characters.  +++$+++ ::I didn't start them, we already have [[:Category:Fictional characters introduced in 1992]] (we need a standard). And yes, not all fictional characters begin as comic book characters. [[User:J 1982|J 1982]] ([[User talk:J 1982#top|talk]]) 15:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

527503 +++$+++ Matthew +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.173664080E09 +++$+++ Hey. Your bot is subst'ing templates that are actually un-substitutable, e.g. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_crossovers_on_Lost&diff=prev&oldid=114350666].  +++$+++ Hey. Your bot is subst'ing templates that are actually un-substitutable, e.g. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_crossovers_on_Lost&diff=prev&oldid=114350666]. [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 18:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
527504 +++$+++ Matthew +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527503 +++$+++ 527503 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.173664320E09 +++$+++ Indeed. It certainly shouldn't have been created, I can't see any benefit from it :-\\, anyhow, cheers for fixing it :-).  +++$+++ :Indeed. It certainly shouldn't have been created, I can't see any benefit from it :-\, anyhow, cheers for fixing it :-). [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 18:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

568515 +++$+++ RadioKirk +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-03 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.151987400E09 +++$+++ LOL sorry ;) Anyway, you should know that different users have differing ideas of what constitutes \"unnecessary exposition\" and, at that length, you will find it changed on some pages, as I've noted. Thought you'd appreciate the heads-up, and happy editing! :) <tt style=\"color:#161;\">RadioKirk<small> ( +++$+++ LOL sorry ;) Anyway, you should know that different users have differing ideas of what constitutes "unnecessary exposition" and, at that length, you will find it changed on some pages, as I've noted. Thought you'd appreciate the heads-up, and happy editing! :) <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 21:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
568516 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568515 +++$+++ 568515 +++$+++ 2006-07-03 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.151990400E09 +++$+++ Changed down to 227 characters now, with your help!  Best wishes and I hope that we meet again in another nice collaboration soon :-) <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Changed down to 227 characters now, with your help!  Best wishes and I hope that we meet again in another nice collaboration soon :-) <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 22:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
568517 +++$+++ RadioKirk +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568515 +++$+++ 568516 +++$+++ 2006-07-03 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.151991840E09 +++$+++ Glad I could help (if you're wondering, someone helped me and I saw an opportunity to return the favor). Happy editing! :) <tt style=\"color:#161;\">RadioKirk<small> ( +++$+++ ::Glad I could help (if you're wondering, someone helped me and I saw an opportunity to return the favor). Happy editing! :) <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 22:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

3220 +++$+++ Deb +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-07 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.302202980E09 +++$+++ Hi.  There's a problem with your use of this category\/subcategories to create pages such as [[1976 in fiction]].  Other pages in similarly-named categories are used for listing works of fiction ''written'' in those years.  Your article is for works ''set'' in those years.  I would suggest renaming these accordingly, eg. Works of fiction set in 1976.  What do you think?  +++$+++ Hi.  There's a problem with your use of this category/subcategories to create pages such as [[1976 in fiction]].  Other pages in similarly-named categories are used for listing works of fiction ''written'' in those years.  Your article is for works ''set'' in those years.  I would suggest renaming these accordingly, eg. Works of fiction set in 1976.  What do you think? [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb|talk]]) 12:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
3221 +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ J 1982 +++$+++ 3220 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.302214140E09 +++$+++ Several pages like this were created before, but I agrre, move to \"fiction set in\".  +++$+++ ::Several pages like this were created before, but I agrre, move to "fiction set in". [[User:J 1982|J 1982]] ([[User talk:J 1982#top|talk]]) 15:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

265366 +++$+++ RJHall +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-14 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.152924480E09 +++$+++ Frankly I don't know what you're talking about. There was no sarcasm in my reply, and it sounds now like you're trying to stir up another argument. What am I supposedly joining? No I am not a High School teacher; I'm a Systems Analyst. If that matters in the least. &mdash;  +++$+++ Frankly I don't know what you're talking about. There was no sarcasm in my reply, and it sounds now like you're trying to stir up another argument. What am I supposedly joining? No I am not a High School teacher; I'm a Systems Analyst. If that matters in the least. &mdash; [[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 17:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
265367 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265366 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.150954500E09 +++$+++ Just create link to a new page ([[Talk:Fidel Castro\/Archive_11]]) and start the page. I'm afraid we'll have to remove the content manually. But let's wait a bit until there is some consensus on what stays and what's going to be archived. <strong> +++$+++ :::Just create link to a new page ([[Talk:Fidel Castro/Archive_11]]) and start the page. I'm afraid we'll have to remove the content manually. But let's wait a bit until there is some consensus on what stays and what's going to be archived. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 22:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

3223 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-03 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.262545800E09 +++$+++ First of all, a very good New Year to you and yours. Hope you have a grand twenty-ten. Secondly, you will be unsurprised to learn that I am requesting some data from your Gaelic lexicon. Many years ago I was in [[North Lochs]] during the festivities surrounding the funeral of a member of the local religious establishment. The phrase \"curamach\" was used on no few occasions to refer to the sincere intentions of those present to foreswear the use of ethyl alcohol as a recreational drug. I recently found this word on [http:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/curamach wiktionary] where it seems to have a more prosaic and literal meaning. All the ghits I looked at were either ambiguous or in one of the many languages I don't speak. I realise as a sober and respectable individual your personal experience of the concept may be limited, but I wonder if you know whether the phrase \"taking the curamach\" has currency beyond the narrow confines of the east coast of Lewis? Regards to you this Sabbath day.  +++$+++ First of all, a very good New Year to you and yours. Hope you have a grand twenty-ten. Secondly, you will be unsurprised to learn that I am requesting some data from your Gaelic lexicon. Many years ago I was in [[North Lochs]] during the festivities surrounding the funeral of a member of the local religious establishment. The phrase "curamach" was used on no few occasions to refer to the sincere intentions of those present to foreswear the use of ethyl alcohol as a recreational drug. I recently found this word on [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/curamach wiktionary] where it seems to have a more prosaic and literal meaning. All the ghits I looked at were either ambiguous or in one of the many languages I don't speak. I realise as a sober and respectable individual your personal experience of the concept may be limited, but I wonder if you know whether the phrase "taking the curamach" has currency beyond the narrow confines of the east coast of Lewis? Regards to you this Sabbath day. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 11:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
3224 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3223 +++$+++ 3223 +++$+++ 2010-01-03 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.262548140E09 +++$+++ Agus a leithid eile dhut is m\xf3ran dhiubh! (And the same to you and many of them) Now to your question, joyfully breaking the Sabbath... The core meanings of ''c\xf9ram'' (and the derived adjective ''c\xf9ramach'') are indeed fairly prosaic, along the lines of \"care, attention, charge, trust, responsibility...\" So regarding the word itself, there is no specific connection to abstemiousness. However, Gaelic makes strong use of idioms involving a preposition + another word (cf put up with, on, down etc) and some of these have more specific meanings which go in the direction of what you heard. There is the phrase ''tha c\xf9ram air'' (be care on-him) which translates as \"he is a converted man\" (in a religious sense) and, closer to what you heard, ''a' gabhail c\xf9ram'' (at taking care) \"to be concerned about, to meditate on\". Those are used widely and I can see how they would fit the situation you described. It is possible that the phrase has taken on a particular connotation in relation to drink in North Lochs but I'm fairly certain that this would extend only to the phrase, not the word ''c\xf9ram'' itself as it has a myriad of other functions in the language. It's not a plain yes or no, but I hope it helps!  +++$+++ :Agus a leithid eile dhut is móran dhiubh! (And the same to you and many of them) Now to your question, joyfully breaking the Sabbath... The core meanings of ''cùram'' (and the derived adjective ''cùramach'') are indeed fairly prosaic, along the lines of "care, attention, charge, trust, responsibility..." So regarding the word itself, there is no specific connection to abstemiousness. However, Gaelic makes strong use of idioms involving a preposition + another word (cf put up with, on, down etc) and some of these have more specific meanings which go in the direction of what you heard. There is the phrase ''tha cùram air'' (be care on-him) which translates as "he is a converted man" (in a religious sense) and, closer to what you heard, ''a' gabhail cùram'' (at taking care) "to be concerned about, to meditate on". Those are used widely and I can see how they would fit the situation you described. It is possible that the phrase has taken on a particular connotation in relation to drink in North Lochs but I'm fairly certain that this would extend only to the phrase, not the word ''cùram'' itself as it has a myriad of other functions in the language. It's not a plain yes or no, but I hope it helps! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
3225 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3223 +++$+++ 3223 +++$+++ 2010-01-03 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.262556840E09 +++$+++ LOL thank you!  +++$+++ :LOL thank you! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 14:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

602411 +++$+++ Belovedfreak +++$+++ Mark Dingemanse +++$+++ 602411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.174352820E09 +++$+++ {{tl|WP Africa Invitation}}  +++$+++ {{tl|WP Africa Invitation}} [[User:Belovedfreak|Belovedfreak]] 18:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
602412 +++$+++ Mark Dingemanse +++$+++ Mark Dingemanse +++$+++ 602411 +++$+++ 602411 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.174353120E09 +++$+++ Yep, I'm aware of the new WikiProject Africa. However, I won't join; chiefly because I simply lack the time (see above), but also a because I'm afraid Africa is too broad in scope for one overarching Wikiproject. &mdash;  +++$+++ :Yep, I'm aware of the new WikiProject Africa. However, I won't join; chiefly because I simply lack the time (see above), but also a because I'm afraid Africa is too broad in scope for one overarching Wikiproject. &mdash; [[User:Mark Dingemanse|mark]] [[User Talk:Mark Dingemanse|&#9998;]] 18:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

3226 +++$+++ Venerock +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-04 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.262602440E09 +++$+++ if you are native basque, you should have knowlegde about your region than me, cuz im venezuelan, .. i just think'd thats a pottock, but if you are sure, delete it, cheers =)-- +++$+++ if you are native basque, you should have knowlegde about your region than me, cuz im venezuelan, .. i just think'd thats a pottock, but if you are sure, delete it, cheers =)--[[User:Venerock|Venerock]] ([[User talk:Venerock|talk]]) 02:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
3227 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3226 +++$+++ 3226 +++$+++ 2010-01-04 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.262631540E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks mate!  +++$+++ :Ok, thanks mate! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 10:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

527515 +++$+++ Stevertigo +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-20 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.174384320E09 +++$+++ No I havent. Thats new technology to me. - +++$+++ No I havent. Thats new technology to me. -[[User:Stevertigo|Ste]][[User_talk:Stevertigo|vertigo]] 02:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
527516 +++$+++ Selket +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527515 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.174426200E09 +++$+++ I do think that there are many new editors who, right or wrong, view admins as moderators.  Your admining may put you in the ''other'' group, but again this can be fixed with a little awareness on your part that you are doing two jobs.  I'm sure you'll be able to balance the two roles.  Good luck.  -- ''' +++$+++ ::I do think that there are many new editors who, right or wrong, view admins as moderators.  Your admining may put you in the ''other'' group, but again this can be fixed with a little awareness on your part that you are doing two jobs.  I'm sure you'll be able to balance the two roles.  Good luck.  -- '''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 14:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

3228 +++$+++ Skinsmoke +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-07 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.262922360E09 +++$+++ I don't profess to be an expert on the [[Scottish Gaelic language|Gaelic language]], but note that the Gaelic Wikipedia has ''\xc0rcaibh'', redirected from ''Arcaibh''.  Are you certain it should be a short vowel?  +++$+++ I don't profess to be an expert on the [[Scottish Gaelic language|Gaelic language]], but note that the Gaelic Wikipedia has ''Àrcaibh'', redirected from ''Arcaibh''.  Are you certain it should be a short vowel? [[User:Skinsmoke|Skinsmoke]] ([[User talk:Skinsmoke|talk]]) 19:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
3229 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3228 +++$+++ 3228 +++$+++ 2010-01-07 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.262922900E09 +++$+++ Yes I'm sure - please check the last topic on the Orkney talk page. Sadly the Gaelic wiki is full of errors.  +++$+++ :Yes I'm sure - please check the last topic on the Orkney talk page. Sadly the Gaelic wiki is full of errors. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 19:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
3230 +++$+++ Skinsmoke +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3228 +++$+++ 3229 +++$+++ 2010-01-07 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.262923320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for that. [[User:Skinsmoke|Skinsmoke]] ([[User talk:Skinsmoke|talk]]) 20:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
3231 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3228 +++$+++ 3230 +++$+++ 2010-01-07 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.262923500E09 +++$+++ You're welcome!  +++$+++ :::You're welcome! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 20:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

524826 +++$+++ Horologium +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524826 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-14 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.200366120E09 +++$+++ I know you are active in [[WP:XXX]] (although primarily the straight variety), which I kept in mind when I framed my response to you on the AFD. Honestly, would you consider his porn career to rise to the level of notability if he had not been outed in such a spectacular fashion? About half of his filmography consists of original material over a roughly three-year period (1992-1995); everything after that point appears to be recycled material. I don't think any of his work won any awards, and as I noted, none of the films have Wikipedia articles. The reason I am asking this relates back to my proposal to create a new article based on the outing, rather than a lame, misleading \"biography\". ''' +++$+++ I know you are active in [[WP:XXX]] (although primarily the straight variety), which I kept in mind when I framed my response to you on the AFD. Honestly, would you consider his porn career to rise to the level of notability if he had not been outed in such a spectacular fashion? About half of his filmography consists of original material over a roughly three-year period (1992-1995); everything after that point appears to be recycled material. I don't think any of his work won any awards, and as I noted, none of the films have Wikipedia articles. The reason I am asking this relates back to my proposal to create a new article based on the outing, rather than a lame, misleading "biography". '''[[User:Horologium|<font color="DarkSlateGray">Horologium</font>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Horologium|(talk)]]</small> 19:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
524827 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524826 +++$+++ 524826 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.200367140E09 +++$+++ You do have a point; our criteria for porn star notability is for awards, or unique contribution, or major media notice, and I haven't seen that, independent of the outing. Want to write an article in your user space that looks like what your proposed rewrite would look like? I objected because I thought it would be hard to do justice to what the media has written about him in an article titled merely \"Sanchez incident\" but maybe you can do it. -- +++$+++ : You do have a point; our criteria for porn star notability is for awards, or unique contribution, or major media notice, and I haven't seen that, independent of the outing. Want to write an article in your user space that looks like what your proposed rewrite would look like? I objected because I thought it would be hard to do justice to what the media has written about him in an article titled merely "Sanchez incident" but maybe you can do it. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 19:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
524828 +++$+++ Horologium +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524826 +++$+++ 524827 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.200373260E09 +++$+++ Gahhh. The arbitration case has me so upset at him right now... I'll see if I can throw something together that works. I just *know* that there will be attempts to add in the escorting allegations, so I will see what I can do to add it in a way that makes it clear that he has totally disavowed them; it's hard to find reliable sources for the denial. I also strongly believe that many of the allegedly reliable sources being used in the current train wreck are inappropriate (from lefty partisan sources such as Media Matters for America, In newsweekly, and the John Edwards campaign site to righty partisans such as Michelle Malkin\/Hot Air, Right Wing News and World Net Daily, plus a fistful of YouTube videos and a couple of posts from various discussion fora). John Hoellwarth's three articles in the ''Marine Corps Times'', the factual stuff from ''The Advocate'' and ''Columbia Daily Spectator'', and one or two of Sanchez's op-eds might be usable, but the rest is going to get jettisoned. ''' +++$+++ ::Gahhh. The arbitration case has me so upset at him right now... I'll see if I can throw something together that works. I just *know* that there will be attempts to add in the escorting allegations, so I will see what I can do to add it in a way that makes it clear that he has totally disavowed them; it's hard to find reliable sources for the denial. I also strongly believe that many of the allegedly reliable sources being used in the current train wreck are inappropriate (from lefty partisan sources such as Media Matters for America, In newsweekly, and the John Edwards campaign site to righty partisans such as Michelle Malkin/Hot Air, Right Wing News and World Net Daily, plus a fistful of YouTube videos and a couple of posts from various discussion fora). John Hoellwarth's three articles in the ''Marine Corps Times'', the factual stuff from ''The Advocate'' and ''Columbia Daily Spectator'', and one or two of Sanchez's op-eds might be usable, but the rest is going to get jettisoned. '''[[User:Horologium|<font color="DarkSlateGray">Horologium</font>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Horologium|(talk)]]</small> 21:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

527518 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527518 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-22 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.174598280E09 +++$+++ QUESTION: Can your 'bot that can clean up the irrelevant links to this template, keeping the links in articles that are still included in the template?<br \/>-- +++$+++ QUESTION: Can your 'bot that can clean up the irrelevant links to this template, keeping the links in articles that are still included in the template?<br />--[[User:Orlady|orlady]] 14:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
527519 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527518 +++$+++ 527518 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.174648260E09 +++$+++ My general notion is, as you inferred, to just make sure the template is only on the pages that are listed in the template, but no others. (I don't think it belongs on a few of the pages ''-- i.e., those for broader topics --'' that are listed in the template, either, but that's a minor issue.) -- +++$+++ :My general notion is, as you inferred, to just make sure the template is only on the pages that are listed in the template, but no others. (I don't think it belongs on a few of the pages ''-- i.e., those for broader topics --'' that are listed in the template, either, but that's a minor issue.) --[[User:Orlady|orlady]] 04:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

265375 +++$+++ Clevelander +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-04 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.152069480E09 +++$+++ I know that I overreacted and I apologize.  I'm concentrating on getting my deletion entry removed now. -- +++$+++ I know that I overreacted and I apologize.  I'm concentrating on getting my deletion entry removed now. --[[User:Clevelander|Clevelander]] 20:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
265376 +++$+++ Matticus78 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265375 +++$+++ 265375 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.152319320E09 +++$+++ <nowiki>{{subst:afd3 | pg=Page Name}}<\/nowiki> tag, which automatically lists it and any changes made to the justification page (like other people's votes and comments) get updated on the log page automatically.  ~  +++$+++ *<nowiki>{{subst:afd3 | pg=Page Name}}</nowiki> tag, which automatically lists it and any changes made to the justification page (like other people's votes and comments) get updated on the log page automatically.  ~ [[User:Matticus78|Matticus78]] 17:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

3232 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-08 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.263010320E09 +++$+++ I recently came across [[Sl\xe1inte]] (or Sl\xe0inte if you prefer). The closing sentence appears to be in a language vaguely resembling English and could do with some translation if you have a mind.  +++$+++ I recently came across [[Sláinte]] (or Slàinte if you prefer). The closing sentence appears to be in a language vaguely resembling English and could do with some translation if you have a mind. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 20:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
3233 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3232 +++$+++ 3232 +++$+++ 2010-01-09 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.263030600E09 +++$+++ ROFL the whole thing is a mess. I'll sort it.  +++$+++ :ROFL the whole thing is a mess. I'll sort it. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 01:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
3234 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3232 +++$+++ 3233 +++$+++ 2010-01-09 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.263064800E09 +++$+++ Splendidly done sir. I'm afraid  I have subsequently lowered the tone by adding a note about a variant occasionally emanating from 32 University Avenue, G12.  +++$+++ ::Splendidly done sir. I'm afraid  I have subsequently lowered the tone by adding a note about a variant occasionally emanating from 32 University Avenue, G12. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 11:20, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
3235 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3232 +++$+++ 3234 +++$+++ 2010-01-09 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.263068100E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't say it lowered the tone. I've added a few more bits... seems over ref'd for such a small page now LOL  +++$+++ :::I wouldn't say it lowered the tone. I've added a few more bits... seems over ref'd for such a small page now LOL [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 12:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

481136 +++$+++ Reub2000 +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481136 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-09 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.155190920E09 +++$+++ What are you having a problem with? Are you having trouble with the ssh authentication?  +++$+++ What are you having a problem with? Are you having trouble with the ssh authentication? [[User:Reub2000|Reub2000]] 23:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
481137 +++$+++ Reub2000 +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481136 +++$+++ 481136 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.155192900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Reub2000|Reub2000]] 23:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
481138 +++$+++ Reub2000 +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481136 +++$+++ 481137 +++$+++ 2006-08-13 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.155533940E09 +++$+++ Do you have any other questions? Are you still having trouble?  +++$+++ ::Do you have any other questions? Are you still having trouble? [[User:Reub2000|Reub2000]] 22:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
481139 +++$+++ Reub2000 +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481136 +++$+++ 481138 +++$+++ 2006-08-15 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.155647880E09 +++$+++ On an unrelated note I'm going to [[Starved Rock]] from Aug 15-18, and I probably won't be able to update storm tracks duing this period. +++$+++ :::On an unrelated note I'm going to [[Starved Rock]] from Aug 15-18, and I probably won't be able to update storm tracks duing this period.[[User:Reub2000|Reub2000]] 06:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

265378 +++$+++ Zleitzen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.152337380E09 +++$+++ Hi KarenAnn. I wrote the above article a while ago (still unfinished pending further input from other contibutors as I haven't the patience to do it all myself). I've lost track of some of the stuff I used as reference, and I'm now trying to reference the thing. But I'm not very good at that side, how to format footnotes etc. Could you have a look at it please. Your help would be much appreciated.-- +++$+++ Hi KarenAnn. I wrote the above article a while ago (still unfinished pending further input from other contibutors as I haven't the patience to do it all myself). I've lost track of some of the stuff I used as reference, and I'm now trying to reference the thing. But I'm not very good at that side, how to format footnotes etc. Could you have a look at it please. Your help would be much appreciated.--[[User:Zleitzen|Zleitzen]] 22:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
265379 +++$+++ Zleitzen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265378 +++$+++ 265378 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.152341040E09 +++$+++ I'm just asking about footnotes and referencing - technical matters, KarenAnn as I don't know how to do it and I'm usless with computers. I only know how to do external links references. I wrote the whole article as it is now some time ago, based largely on what I knew - combining a few pieces of precise info taken from internet sources - with the exeption of the recent relations area which I've left to others to compile.-- +++$+++ :I'm just asking about footnotes and referencing - technical matters, KarenAnn as I don't know how to do it and I'm usless with computers. I only know how to do external links references. I wrote the whole article as it is now some time ago, based largely on what I knew - combining a few pieces of precise info taken from internet sources - with the exeption of the recent relations area which I've left to others to compile.--[[User:Zleitzen|Zleitzen]] 23:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
265380 +++$+++ Zleitzen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265378 +++$+++ 265379 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.152341580E09 +++$+++ Thanks Karen Ann, I'll take a look at what you've done and try to replicate it for future sourcing styles on articles.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks Karen Ann, I'll take a look at what you've done and try to replicate it for future sourcing styles on articles.--[[User:Zleitzen|Zleitzen]] 23:53, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

527523 +++$+++  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-25 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.174813260E09 +++$+++ ah yes, i will digg up my example. Shouldn't take too long. -- +++$+++ ah yes, i will digg up my example. Shouldn't take too long. --[[User:TheDJ|TheDJ]] ([[User talk:TheDJ|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheDJ|contribs]] • [[WP:TV|WikiProject Television]]) 02:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
527524 +++$+++  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527523 +++$+++ 527523 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.174819260E09 +++$+++ Got it. Replace TVep with this version: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:TheDJ\/SandboxTemplate&oldid=117676245 and then you can substitute all the template cases. (I have to admit, it's a pain to figure out :D ) -- +++$+++ :Got it. Replace TVep with this version: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:TheDJ/SandboxTemplate&oldid=117676245 and then you can substitute all the template cases. (I have to admit, it's a pain to figure out :D ) --[[User:TheDJ|TheDJ]] ([[User talk:TheDJ|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheDJ|contribs]] • [[WP:TV|WikiProject Television]]) 03:41, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

3237 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-19 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.263967260E09 +++$+++ Oh, quick answer (and nice article). I don't know if I get you, yes it is indeed what you are saying, and it is relevant to the article, since there's a confusion in Basque about the term. Actually, I found a discussion on the internet about the term which turned out pretty enlightening. I held Baserri as a building (Ok, and people) up to pretty recently, but not the whole community and lands around it. The distinction between Baserri-etxe and Baserri is maintained in the Bizkaian dialect curruntly. Besides, I went through the article today, and I missed some mentions to the baserris springing up after the new rich from America started to build when coming back, since before they were mainly used a cider presses, but not for dwelling in them (cf. the baserri from Ezkio-Itsaso now for exhibition). Just a suggestion, regards  +++$+++ Oh, quick answer (and nice article). I don't know if I get you, yes it is indeed what you are saying, and it is relevant to the article, since there's a confusion in Basque about the term. Actually, I found a discussion on the internet about the term which turned out pretty enlightening. I held Baserri as a building (Ok, and people) up to pretty recently, but not the whole community and lands around it. The distinction between Baserri-etxe and Baserri is maintained in the Bizkaian dialect curruntly. Besides, I went through the article today, and I missed some mentions to the baserris springing up after the new rich from America started to build when coming back, since before they were mainly used a cider presses, but not for dwelling in them (cf. the baserri from Ezkio-Itsaso now for exhibition). Just a suggestion, regards [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 22:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
3238 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3237 +++$+++ 3237 +++$+++ 2010-01-19 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.263969720E09 +++$+++ Interesting note about the baserri-etxe vs baserri, that might be worthwhile adding. I'll see if I can find a ref. Working sagardotegiak into the article is a nice idea too, feel free. I just decided to write the article because of another Basque article I was editing which really needed a good explanation of what a baserri is.  +++$+++ :Interesting note about the baserri-etxe vs baserri, that might be worthwhile adding. I'll see if I can find a ref. Working sagardotegiak into the article is a nice idea too, feel free. I just decided to write the article because of another Basque article I was editing which really needed a good explanation of what a baserri is. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 22:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
3239 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3237 +++$+++ 3238 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.264019340E09 +++$+++ Aupa, ez horregatik. Yes, please reword it, I'll have a look it and tell you sth. I may add some details too in the next days, feel free to check, mend and polish it up.  +++$+++ ::Aupa, ez horregatik. Yes, please reword it, I'll have a look it and tell you sth. I may add some details too in the next days, feel free to check, mend and polish it up. [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 12:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

3240 +++$+++ Maunus +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-22 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.264191180E09 +++$+++ Hi Akerbeltz, congratulations with getting Erromintxela to Good Article Status. Impressive work! If you accept suggestions on how to further improve it I would suggest doing something about the ratio of tables to readable prose. In my opinion it is hampered by much to great reliance on providing examples in table format rather than describing the topic inactual prose. The result is an article that is very difficult to read and seems too detailed (much too many example of differences in vocabulary in my opinion) in certain areas while lacking basic information in others. I am sure you can continue improving the article by replacing tables with sections of where the important points that the examples in the tables are supposed to illustrate is explained in prose form. IO'd suggest looking at the structure of some of the language Featured Articles such as [[Nahuatl]], [[Swedish language]], [[Turkish language]] or [[Mayan languages]] to get a feeling for how to use prose and tables together to make coherent and easily readable articles. I hope you don't mind my comments, that are certainly not intended to disparage the hard work you have put into making such an inaccesible topic a Good Article - on the contrary I wish to congratulate you again with your good work on Erromintxela and other minority languages. Your work is a boon to wikipedia!  +++$+++ Hi Akerbeltz, congratulations with getting Erromintxela to Good Article Status. Impressive work! If you accept suggestions on how to further improve it I would suggest doing something about the ratio of tables to readable prose. In my opinion it is hampered by much to great reliance on providing examples in table format rather than describing the topic inactual prose. The result is an article that is very difficult to read and seems too detailed (much too many example of differences in vocabulary in my opinion) in certain areas while lacking basic information in others. I am sure you can continue improving the article by replacing tables with sections of where the important points that the examples in the tables are supposed to illustrate is explained in prose form. IO'd suggest looking at the structure of some of the language Featured Articles such as [[Nahuatl]], [[Swedish language]], [[Turkish language]] or [[Mayan languages]] to get a feeling for how to use prose and tables together to make coherent and easily readable articles. I hope you don't mind my comments, that are certainly not intended to disparage the hard work you have put into making such an inaccesible topic a Good Article - on the contrary I wish to congratulate you again with your good work on Erromintxela and other minority languages. Your work is a boon to wikipedia! [[User:Maunus|·Maunus·<span class="Unicode">ƛ</span>·]] 12:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
3241 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3240 +++$+++ 3240 +++$+++ 2010-01-22 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.264194660E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much - the very same is true for your own contributions to wikipedia too of course! And yes, I certainly accept suggestions\/criticisms. I fully agree on your comments regarding the article. The main problem though is that there is not much more information available on it currently, I've pretty much squeezed all the lemons bone dry pending further publications, it is such an under-researched language. I did think hard about those tables when I started thinking about taking it to GA and asked around a bit. In the end, I decided to keep the tables so the page is actually a fairly good summation of ALL the published information on the language (most of it in wordlist form actually, that poem is just about the only coherent piece recorded that is longer than a single sentence...) as it stands due to the rather odd circumstances of a totally under-researched language in western europe. But I will certainly keep an eye out for possible improvements along the lines suggested and of course for any new data in the Basque press.  +++$+++ :Thank you very much - the very same is true for your own contributions to wikipedia too of course! And yes, I certainly accept suggestions/criticisms. I fully agree on your comments regarding the article. The main problem though is that there is not much more information available on it currently, I've pretty much squeezed all the lemons bone dry pending further publications, it is such an under-researched language. I did think hard about those tables when I started thinking about taking it to GA and asked around a bit. In the end, I decided to keep the tables so the page is actually a fairly good summation of ALL the published information on the language (most of it in wordlist form actually, that poem is just about the only coherent piece recorded that is longer than a single sentence...) as it stands due to the rather odd circumstances of a totally under-researched language in western europe. But I will certainly keep an eye out for possible improvements along the lines suggested and of course for any new data in the Basque press. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 13:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

3242 +++$+++ Kamitxu +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-24 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.264354800E09 +++$+++ Antoine d'Abbadie had Basque ancestry by his father, was a Basque-resident, was a Basque-speaker ( Souletin and Lapurdian ), was a self-defined Basque and a forefather of Basque national sentiment, if that's not enough for being in the List of Basques, then what is? -- +++$+++ Antoine d'Abbadie had Basque ancestry by his father, was a Basque-resident, was a Basque-speaker ( Souletin and Lapurdian ), was a self-defined Basque and a forefather of Basque national sentiment, if that's not enough for being in the List of Basques, then what is? --[[User:Kamitxu|Kamitxu]] ([[User talk:Kamitxu|talk]]) 09:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
3243 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3242 +++$+++ 3242 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.264361100E09 +++$+++ Just read the bio again, you're right, he should be on the List of Basques rather than the other page. I'll take him off the other list and move him, but only one listing is ok. I'll move him to Explorers or a related category. Sorry about that, I think when I helped tidy the list the article was still a stub and I did't look too closely the other day.  +++$+++ :Just read the bio again, you're right, he should be on the List of Basques rather than the other page. I'll take him off the other list and move him, but only one listing is ok. I'll move him to Explorers or a related category. Sorry about that, I think when I helped tidy the list the article was still a stub and I did't look too closely the other day. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:25, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

44231 +++$+++ Foofbun +++$+++ Foofbun +++$+++ 44231 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-24 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.264399260E09 +++$+++ Give it a try or as they say, 'run it up the flagstaff and see if anyone salutes it'.  Good luck!  +++$+++ Give it a try or as they say, 'run it up the flagstaff and see if anyone salutes it'.  Good luck! [[User:Foofbun|Foofbun]] ([[User talk:Foofbun#top|talk]]) 22:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
44232 +++$+++ Varlaam +++$+++ Foofbun +++$+++ 44231 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.264399860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Varlaam|Varlaam]] ([[User talk:Varlaam|talk]]) 22:11, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

3244 +++$+++ Sj +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-31 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.264939140E09 +++$+++ Hello akerbeltz -- your vote on the [[m:Proposals_for_closing_projects\/Closure of_Sango_Wikipedia_(2)|Closure of the S\xe4ng\xf6 WP]] wasn't counted b\/c you hadn't logged into meta.  (though you did sign your name, so I'm leaving you this message :)   +++$+++ Hello akerbeltz -- your vote on the [[m:Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure of_Sango_Wikipedia_(2)|Closure of the Sängö WP]] wasn't counted b/c you hadn't logged into meta.  (though you did sign your name, so I'm leaving you this message :)  [[User:Sj|+sj]][[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#f90" style="color:#f90;">'''+'''</font>]] 03:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
3245 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3244 +++$+++ 3244 +++$+++ 2010-01-31 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.264966200E09 +++$+++ Thank you! Though if you look two lines below the strikethrough, I did subsequently log in and vote.  +++$+++ :Thank you! Though if you look two lines below the strikethrough, I did subsequently log in and vote. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

265389 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-16 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.153113720E09 +++$+++ Hey, no problem...yes, I am a native Montanan, but live elsewhere now. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia.-- +++$+++ Hey, no problem...yes, I am a native Montanan, but live elsewhere now. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 22:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
265390 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265389 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.150954500E09 +++$+++ Just create link to a new page ([[Talk:Fidel Castro\/Archive_11]]) and start the page. I'm afraid we'll have to remove the content manually. But let's wait a bit until there is some consensus on what stays and what's going to be archived. <strong> +++$+++ :::Just create link to a new page ([[Talk:Fidel Castro/Archive_11]]) and start the page. I'm afraid we'll have to remove the content manually. But let's wait a bit until there is some consensus on what stays and what's going to be archived. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 22:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

3246 +++$+++ Comhreir +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3246 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-31 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.265005440E09 +++$+++ Hi Akerbeltz, is your book out yet? Feel free to email me offline if you like. (It's Andrew C)  +++$+++ Hi Akerbeltz, is your book out yet? Feel free to email me offline if you like. (It's Andrew C) [[User:Comhreir|Comhreir]] ([[User talk:Comhreir|talk]]) 22:24, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
3247 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3246 +++$+++ 3246 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.265147580E09 +++$+++ Still working on it - I estimate summer 2010. Sorry, life is being complicated and keeps getting in the way!  +++$+++ :Still working on it - I estimate summer 2010. Sorry, life is being complicated and keeps getting in the way! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 13:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

3248 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-31 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.265008560E09 +++$+++ Aupa Akerbeltz, added something and left a message for you in the discussion section of the Baserri. You wrote a book? Languages? Goraintzi!  +++$+++ Aupa Akerbeltz, added something and left a message for you in the discussion section of the Baserri. You wrote a book? Languages? Goraintzi! [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 23:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
3249 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3248 +++$+++ 3248 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.265051340E09 +++$+++ Responded there. Which book do you mean? Not ''Blas na G\xe0idhlig''?  +++$+++ :Responded there. Which book do you mean? Not ''Blas na Gàidhlig''? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:09, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
3250 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3248 +++$+++ 3249 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.265147400E09 +++$+++ Answered on the other article too. The book? I don't know, hehe, the one mentioned above;). Cheers  +++$+++ :: Answered on the other article too. The book? I don't know, hehe, the one mentioned above;). Cheers [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 13:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
3251 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3248 +++$+++ 3250 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.265147640E09 +++$+++ Ah, I missed that! He means [http:\/\/www.amazon.co.uk\/Blas-Na-Gaidhlig-Practical-Pronunciation\/dp\/1907165002\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1265118813&sr=8-1 Blas na G\xe0idhlig]. It's on Gaelic pronunciation.  +++$+++ :::Ah, I missed that! He means [http://www.amazon.co.uk/Blas-Na-Gaidhlig-Practical-Pronunciation/dp/1907165002/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1265118813&sr=8-1 Blas na Gàidhlig]. It's on Gaelic pronunciation. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 13:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
3252 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3248 +++$+++ 3251 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.265153220E09 +++$+++ Ok, quite specialized for me:) Been in Scotland playing txalaparta long time ago for 5 days or so. Bought a small guide on how to learn Scottish Gaelic, you know that one with pictures and some phrases (Ciamar a tha thu etc.). Good luck with it  +++$+++ ::::Ok, quite specialized for me:) Been in Scotland playing txalaparta long time ago for 5 days or so. Bought a small guide on how to learn Scottish Gaelic, you know that one with pictures and some phrases (Ciamar a tha thu etc.). Good luck with it [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 15:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

527540 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527540 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-25 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.174880820E09 +++$+++ No problem, man. You deserve these tools, and I'm certain that you won't let the community down. Congrats on becoming an admin, and happy editing! \/\/  +++$+++ No problem, man. You deserve these tools, and I'm certain that you won't let the community down. Congrats on becoming an admin, and happy editing! // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 20:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
527541 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527540 +++$+++ 527540 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.174881120E09 +++$+++ Cool, there aren't many AOR's. Well done.  +++$+++ :Cool, there aren't many AOR's. Well done. [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Xiner|email]]) 20:52, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
527542 +++$+++ Premeditated Chaos +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527540 +++$+++ 527540 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.174962900E09 +++$+++ Congrats on your new Big Red Buttons! I trust you won't explode the Wiki; in fact, I can only envision you making it better. Happy editing. <font color=\"#000000\">&spades; +++$+++ :Congrats on your new Big Red Buttons! I trust you won't explode the Wiki; in fact, I can only envision you making it better. Happy editing. <font color="#000000">&spades;[[User:PMC|P]]</font><font color="#FF00FF">[[User_talk:PMC|M]]</font><font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Premeditated Chaos|C]]&spades;</font> 19:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

3253 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-05 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.265361120E09 +++$+++ You're clearly not a native speaker of English - which is fine, but I would urge a little more caution when arguing about style or making (on the face of it) rather hasty changes that sound better to your ears.  +++$+++ You're clearly not a native speaker of English - which is fine, but I would urge a little more caution when arguing about style or making (on the face of it) rather hasty changes that sound better to your ears. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz|talk]]) 01:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
3254 +++$+++ 71.247.231.74 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3253 +++$+++ 3253 +++$+++ 2010-02-06 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.265511900E09 +++$+++ Hence, since Wikipedia is for everyone including non-native English speakers, the articles should be written clearly ([[WP:Manual of Style#Clarity]]) in plain English ([[WP:UPE]]) easy accessible to non-native English speakers too for Wikipedia is not a tutorial of English. Isn't it, please? --[[Special:Contributions\/71.247.231.74|71.247.231.74]] ( +++$+++ :Hence, since Wikipedia is for everyone including non-native English speakers, the articles should be written clearly ([[WP:Manual of Style#Clarity]]) in plain English ([[WP:UPE]]) easy accessible to non-native English speakers too for Wikipedia is not a tutorial of English. Isn't it, please? --[[Special:Contributions/71.247.231.74|71.247.231.74]] ([[User talk:71.247.231.74|talk]]) 19:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
3255 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3253 +++$+++ 3254 +++$+++ 2010-02-06 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.265517600E09 +++$+++ Yes, and there is no reason why non-native speakers can't contribute but your edits did not make anything clearer, they were actually distorting the meaning and the grammar. Note though that the idea of clear English does not mean that we can't use sentences of a type that are perhaps clear to a native speaker but not so clear to someone not fluent.  +++$+++ ::Yes, and there is no reason why non-native speakers can't contribute but your edits did not make anything clearer, they were actually distorting the meaning and the grammar. Note though that the idea of clear English does not mean that we can't use sentences of a type that are perhaps clear to a native speaker but not so clear to someone not fluent. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 20:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

265398 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-18 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.153263900E09 +++$+++ If you wish to start an RFC over the ridiculous accusations of bad faith against you at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Kent-Meridian High School]], do let me know. Clearly you were acting in good faith, and clearly the article as it stood at the time you nominated it was not a clear keep. I think it is now, because of the ACLU lawsuit, but how were you supposed to anticipate that? A \"rescue\" of an article in response to AFD is a common and good outcome. Abuse of the nominator is not. -  +++$+++ If you wish to start an RFC over the ridiculous accusations of bad faith against you at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent-Meridian High School]], do let me know. Clearly you were acting in good faith, and clearly the article as it stood at the time you nominated it was not a clear keep. I think it is now, because of the ACLU lawsuit, but how were you supposed to anticipate that? A "rescue" of an article in response to AFD is a common and good outcome. Abuse of the nominator is not. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 16:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
265399 +++$+++ KarenAnn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265398 +++$+++ 265398 +++$+++ 2006-07-18 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.153266060E09 +++$+++ I thought the nominations were for discussion and information-sharing. But I have been intimidated by that experience and will not BE BOLD.   +++$+++ :I thought the nominations were for discussion and information-sharing. But I have been intimidated by that experience and will not BE BOLD.  [[User:KarenAnn|KarenAnn]] 16:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
265400 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265398 +++$+++ 265399 +++$+++ 2006-07-18 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.153267800E09 +++$+++ For the most part, this is exactly why you might want to start a request for comment: to turn the community's attention to an instance of bullying, rather than be successfully intimidated. But if you are more comfortable letting the bullies win this one, I certainly won't try to bully you into facing them down! Anyway, if you do want to take some sort of action on this, I promise to back you up. -  +++$+++ :: For the most part, this is exactly why you might want to start a request for comment: to turn the community's attention to an instance of bullying, rather than be successfully intimidated. But if you are more comfortable letting the bullies win this one, I certainly won't try to bully you into facing them down! Anyway, if you do want to take some sort of action on this, I promise to back you up. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 17:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
265401 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265398 +++$+++ 265399 +++$+++ 2006-07-18 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.153278480E09 +++$+++ My own stake in this? 2 things: I don't like to see people bullied, and I think it is part of a climate in parts of Wikipedia that can be especially unwelcoming to women and to certain ethnic groups.  +++$+++ ::My own stake in this? 2 things: I don't like to see people bullied, and I think it is part of a climate in parts of Wikipedia that can be especially unwelcoming to women and to certain ethnic groups. [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 20:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

527543 +++$+++ Kntrabssi +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527543 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-25 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.174881060E09 +++$+++ Just thought I'd swing by to say congratulations on becoming a sysop!   +++$+++ Just thought I'd swing by to say congratulations on becoming a sysop!  [[User:Kntrabssi|Kntrabssi]] 20:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
527544 +++$+++ Avraham +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527543 +++$+++ 527543 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.174883640E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! --  +++$+++ :Congratulations! -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] 21:34, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
527545 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527543 +++$+++ 527544 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.174884360E09 +++$+++ No problems mate, you've worked hard and displayed all the behavior that a good admin should. Cheers!  +++$+++ ::No problems mate, you've worked hard and displayed all the behavior that a good admin should. Cheers! [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 21:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

3256 +++$+++ Largoplazo +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-07 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.265609700E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for listing articles at [[WP:Pages needing translation]]. One thing: when you do that, could you please also put the template <nowiki>{{notenglish|<\/nowiki>''language_name''<nowiki>}}<\/nowiki> at the top of each of the articles you list? Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi, thanks for listing articles at [[WP:Pages needing translation]]. One thing: when you do that, could you please also put the template <nowiki>{{notenglish|</nowiki>''language_name''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> at the top of each of the articles you list? Thanks! [[User:Largoplazo|—Largo Plazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 22:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
3257 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3256 +++$+++ 3256 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.265613600E09 +++$+++ My bad, yes, I forgot to do that sorry.   +++$+++ :My bad, yes, I forgot to do that sorry.  [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 23:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

612212 +++$+++ Pengo +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612212 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-12 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.144849140E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Ensifera ensifera.jpg|thumb|left|150px|I award you this Sword-billed Hummingbird for your great work on the Fishapods image!]] Nice work! \u2014 +++$+++ [[Image:Ensifera ensifera.jpg|thumb|left|150px|I award you this Sword-billed Hummingbird for your great work on the Fishapods image!]] Nice work! —[[User:Pengo|Pengo]] 06:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
612213 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612212 +++$+++ 612212 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.144896120E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much: images to order, but please give plenty of notice! ... +++$+++ :Thanks very much: images to order, but please give plenty of notice! ...[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

3258 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-12 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.266034920E09 +++$+++ Hi, re the edit summary [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Scottish_Gaelic&diff=next&oldid=343208553 here] - if that is the case, what ''do'' native speakers say when making a polite request &c? Or does '''gd''' have no \"natural\" equivalent of \"please\" and using sibh, leibh &c is considered enough politeness-wise? (In case this sounds ironic: it's not, it's meant in earnest.) -- +++$+++ Hi, re the edit summary [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scottish_Gaelic&diff=next&oldid=343208553 here] - if that is the case, what ''do'' native speakers say when making a polite request &c? Or does '''gd''' have no "natural" equivalent of "please" and using sibh, leibh &c is considered enough politeness-wise? (In case this sounds ironic: it's not, it's meant in earnest.) --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 20:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
3259 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3258 +++$+++ 3258 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.267923840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the FnaG explanation! I'm slowly getting used to the idea - just as I had to get used to the idea of no direct \"yes\/no\" pair of words  - or for that matter, once upon a time, to the absence of ''sibhsigeadh'' in English... :-) -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the FnaG explanation! I'm slowly getting used to the idea - just as I had to get used to the idea of no direct "yes/no" pair of words  - or for that matter, once upon a time, to the absence of ''sibhsigeadh'' in English... :-) --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 17:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
3260 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3258 +++$+++ 3259 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.267924500E09 +++$+++ 'S e do bheatha :) It's a mental leap alright - though if you really want a challenge, try an [[Ergative\u2013absolutive language]] where you have to mark your nouns for ergative at the start of a sentence, depending on whether your sentence final verb is [[transitive verb|transitive]] or not!  +++$+++ ::'S e do bheatha :) It's a mental leap alright - though if you really want a challenge, try an [[Ergative–absolutive language]] where you have to mark your nouns for ergative at the start of a sentence, depending on whether your sentence final verb is [[transitive verb|transitive]] or not! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 17:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
3261 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3258 +++$+++ 3260 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.267937940E09 +++$+++ Oh my. I guess I've got the idea (thanks to the examples), but I think I'd rather not dig any deeper and stick to the intricacies of languages I already know a bit, like 14 noun cases in Czech, 12 tenses in English, 8 definite articles in Gaelic &c, only remembering that Basque &Co have yet another feature which makes linguistics so fascinating... ;-) -- +++$+++ :::Oh my. I guess I've got the idea (thanks to the examples), but I think I'd rather not dig any deeper and stick to the intricacies of languages I already know a bit, like 14 noun cases in Czech, 12 tenses in English, 8 definite articles in Gaelic &c, only remembering that Basque &Co have yet another feature which makes linguistics so fascinating... ;-) --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 20:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

3262 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-12 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.266035940E09 +++$+++ I have moved [[P\xecobaireachd]] to [[Pibroch]] as requested on the talk page; I have also altered the two redirect pages [[Piobaireach]] and [[Piobaireachd]] to point directly to ''Pibroch'' so as to avoid double redirects. Will you do any other tidying up that is required? There are a lot of other links that come in to ''P\xecobaireachd'', but fortunately per [[WP:NOTBROKEN]] we don't need to alter them. Regards,  +++$+++ I have moved [[Pìobaireachd]] to [[Pibroch]] as requested on the talk page; I have also altered the two redirect pages [[Piobaireach]] and [[Piobaireachd]] to point directly to ''Pibroch'' so as to avoid double redirects. Will you do any other tidying up that is required? There are a lot of other links that come in to ''Pìobaireachd'', but fortunately per [[WP:NOTBROKEN]] we don't need to alter them. Regards, [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 20:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
3263 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3262 +++$+++ 3262 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.266036960E09 +++$+++ Yes, I will, thanks for moving the page!  +++$+++ :Yes, I will, thanks for moving the page! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 20:56, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

87925 +++$+++ Thisthat2011 +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-30 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.304216220E09 +++$+++ Hi, I would expect views from your side on my comments in discussion on India. Last 2 days there is not much coming from your side, and today the changes are reverted without discussing on it, saying that consensus is not made yet. Better discuss this in discussion and please avoid reverting changes without discussing why the changes are not good. +++$+++ Hi, I would expect views from your side on my comments in discussion on India. Last 2 days there is not much coming from your side, and today the changes are reverted without discussing on it, saying that consensus is not made yet. Better discuss this in discussion and please avoid reverting changes without discussing why the changes are not good.[[User:thisthat2011|<font color="#FFD700">.असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर &#124; असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म..</font>]] 19:17, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
87926 +++$+++ MikeLynch +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87925 +++$+++ 87925 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.304216820E09 +++$+++ {{tps}}It is usual practice to establish firm consensus before making changes or adding images to a Featured Article. ''' +++$+++ :{{tps}}It is usual practice to establish firm consensus before making changes or adding images to a Featured Article. '''[[User:MikeLynch|<span style="color:#000080">Yes </span><span style="color:#00BFFF">Michael?</span>]] •[[User talk:MikeLynch|<sup><span style="color:green"><small>Talk</small></span></sup>]]''' 19:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
87927 +++$+++ Thisthat2011 +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87925 +++$+++ 87926 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.304228280E09 +++$+++ I am sure it is not usual practice to just revert changes that are discussed after not participating for last 3 days and in the end claiming that there is no consensus. +++$+++ :: I am sure it is not usual practice to just revert changes that are discussed after not participating for last 3 days and in the end claiming that there is no consensus.[[User:thisthat2011|<font color="#FFD700">.असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर &#124; असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म..</font>]] 22:38, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
87928 +++$+++ Chipmunkdavis +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87925 +++$+++ 87927 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.304250120E09 +++$+++ If you make a change when there is clearly no consensus, you should not be surprised if it is reverted.  +++$+++ :::If you make a change when there is clearly no consensus, you should not be surprised if it is reverted. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|Chipmunkdavis]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 04:42, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
87929 +++$+++ Thisthat2011 +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87925 +++$+++ 87928 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.304344380E09 +++$+++ What are the reasons for no consensus? +++$+++ :::: What are the reasons for no consensus?[[User:thisthat2011|<font color="#FF9933">.असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर &#124; असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म..</font>]] 06:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

3264 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-16 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.266339060E09 +++$+++ You may be interested in a discussion at [[Talk:Crann\xf3g]], where an editor writes \"I would find it very hard to believe that the -\xf3g in crann\xf3g is the adjective \xf3g \"young\". \"  +++$+++ You may be interested in a discussion at [[Talk:Crannóg]], where an editor writes "I would find it very hard to believe that the -óg in crannóg is the adjective óg "young". " [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 08:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
3265 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3264 +++$+++ 3264 +++$+++ 2010-02-22 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.266831660E09 +++$+++ Thanks, responded there!  +++$+++ :Thanks, responded there! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 01:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

524832 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-23 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.201138260E09 +++$+++ Then, if we think we have something that can at least have some chance of withstanding challenge, put it up in main space and wait for the AfD to argue about it. Are you willing to put in the work to do that? If so, I can start by moving a deleted version to your (or my) userspace to work from. It might get deleted even so, since we wouldn't have any clear cut claim to notability such as an award, or an indepth mainstream source covering her. We would merely have a lot of borderline sources covering her. For that, having a well written article could make the difference between a Keep and a Delete. Are you willing to take the chance? -- +++$+++ Then, if we think we have something that can at least have some chance of withstanding challenge, put it up in main space and wait for the AfD to argue about it. Are you willing to put in the work to do that? If so, I can start by moving a deleted version to your (or my) userspace to work from. It might get deleted even so, since we wouldn't have any clear cut claim to notability such as an award, or an indepth mainstream source covering her. We would merely have a lot of borderline sources covering her. For that, having a well written article could make the difference between a Keep and a Delete. Are you willing to take the chance? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
524833 +++$+++ Dwanyewest +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524832 +++$+++ 524832 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.201507020E09 +++$+++ Surely the fact she featured in the 2007 AVN Award nomination for Best All-Girl Sex Scene, Video - Girlvana 2, Zero Tolerance with Sammie Rhodes and Jenaveve Jolie makes Puma noteworthy? +++$+++ *Surely the fact she featured in the 2007 AVN Award nomination for Best All-Girl Sex Scene, Video - Girlvana 2, Zero Tolerance with Sammie Rhodes and Jenaveve Jolie makes Puma noteworthy?[[User:Dwanyewest|Dwanyewest]] ([[User talk:Dwanyewest|talk]]) 23:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

3266 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-10 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.284170640E09 +++$+++ [[Scottish Gaelic orthography]] is now also on the menu.  +++$+++ [[Scottish Gaelic orthography]] is now also on the menu. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 19:04, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
3267 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3266 +++$+++ 3266 +++$+++ 2010-09-10 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.284176340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the headsup, already watching :)  +++$+++ :Thanks for the headsup, already watching :) [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 20:39, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

568523 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-04 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.152067920E09 +++$+++ This is a  +++$+++ This is a [[User:Redvers/Your band| non-notable band]] according to the criteria set out in [[WP:BAND]].  One notable indie album or two notable major label albums; a national tour; heavy rotation on a national radio station. If there is no evidence of one or more of these for the band then perhaps Myspace would be a better location for this information rather than an encylopedia, until the criteria are satisfied. <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 19:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
568524 +++$+++ Doktorbuk +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568523 +++$+++ 568523 +++$+++ 2006-07-04 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.152069240E09 +++$+++ I will scour the internet now to find sources for them, and if I cannot satisfy the necessary then obviously I will bow to your decision.  +++$+++ :I will scour the internet now to find sources for them, and if I cannot satisfy the necessary then obviously I will bow to your decision. [[User:Doktorbuk|doktorb]] <sub>[[User talk:Doktorbuk|words]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Doktorbuk|deeds]]</sup> 20:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

3268 +++$+++ Muckapedia +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-22 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.266828900E09 +++$+++ Noticed your spelling revision on [[Canadian Gaelic]] -- are we sure that [http:\/\/www2.smo.uhi.ac.uk\/gaidhlig\/faclair\/sbg\/lorg.php?faclair=sbg&seorsa=Gaidhlig&facal=fairgeach&eis_saor=on&tairg=Lorg Fhairrgeach] with the two Rs is correct? I completely defer to your expertise, although it did look odd to me. I am a huge fan of akerbeltz.org -- you\u2019ve done an amazing job with that site; it and [http:\/\/www.taic.me.uk taic] are the only remotely useful grammar sites I\u2019ve been able to find. I would welcome any other criticisms you might have for the page, it goes without saying I am not a native speaker, simply an enthusiast who wrote the page from scratch some years back. Cheers!  +++$+++ Noticed your spelling revision on [[Canadian Gaelic]] -- are we sure that [http://www2.smo.uhi.ac.uk/gaidhlig/faclair/sbg/lorg.php?faclair=sbg&seorsa=Gaidhlig&facal=fairgeach&eis_saor=on&tairg=Lorg Fhairrgeach] with the two Rs is correct? I completely defer to your expertise, although it did look odd to me. I am a huge fan of akerbeltz.org -- you’ve done an amazing job with that site; it and [http://www.taic.me.uk taic] are the only remotely useful grammar sites I’ve been able to find. I would welcome any other criticisms you might have for the page, it goes without saying I am not a native speaker, simply an enthusiast who wrote the page from scratch some years back. Cheers! [[User:Muckapedia|Muckapedia]] ([[User talk:Muckapedia|talk]]) 00:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
3269 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3268 +++$+++ 3268 +++$+++ 2010-02-22 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.266832080E09 +++$+++ Tha thu ro choibhneil a charaid! Yes, I understand your hesitation on this one. It goes like this - there are broadly speaking two spelling variants of this word, (1) ''fairge'' and (2) ''fairrge''. (1) is due to certain mainland dialects having lost the dark \/R\/, shoddy spelling and the fact that the word ''fairrge'' is highly marked, i.e. it's very rarely used in everyday speech these days. Unlike Irish of course where ''farraige'' is the standard term for the sea. I changed it to (2) for two reasons - it both represents the Hebridean and Skye pronunciations which all have \/R\/ (and represent the vast majority of speakers today) and it also is the historically more accurate spelling (cf [[Old Irish]] ''fairrgi'' etc). Make sense now?  +++$+++ :Tha thu ro choibhneil a charaid! Yes, I understand your hesitation on this one. It goes like this - there are broadly speaking two spelling variants of this word, (1) ''fairge'' and (2) ''fairrge''. (1) is due to certain mainland dialects having lost the dark /R/, shoddy spelling and the fact that the word ''fairrge'' is highly marked, i.e. it's very rarely used in everyday speech these days. Unlike Irish of course where ''farraige'' is the standard term for the sea. I changed it to (2) for two reasons - it both represents the Hebridean and Skye pronunciations which all have /R/ (and represent the vast majority of speakers today) and it also is the historically more accurate spelling (cf [[Old Irish]] ''fairrgi'' etc). Make sense now? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 01:48, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

265413 +++$+++ KarenAnn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-20 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.153423860E09 +++$+++ [[Help:Patrolled edit]] - do you know anything about this aspect of Recent Changes? I read it but don't understand it. (I'm not a computer person.)   +++$+++ [[Help:Patrolled edit]] - do you know anything about this aspect of Recent Changes? I read it but don't understand it. (I'm not a computer person.)  [[User:KarenAnn|KarenAnn]] 12:31, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
265414 +++$+++ Matticus78 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265413 +++$+++ 265413 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.153436340E09 +++$+++ Apparently it's a feature in the [[MediaWiki]] software (the [[server (computing)|server]]-side set of programs that run Wikipedia and all other wiki-based sites) that allows users to mark the latest change to a page as a good one (i.e. not vandalism), making things a little easier for fellow Recent Changes patrollers since it's been confirmed that an edit has already been reviewed and approved, so they don't need to look at it again. However, this is entirely a moot point: while the feature is available in the software, it hasn't been implemented on Wikipedia itself (I suppose because it'd be too easy to abuse if left open for any user to okay a change, and\/or there aren't enough Administrators (966 at last count) for such a busy site to make it work if it were restricted to Administrator users only). It might be something to look out for in the future, but I can't see it working well on the site as it currently stands. ~ +++$+++ :Apparently it's a feature in the [[MediaWiki]] software (the [[server (computing)|server]]-side set of programs that run Wikipedia and all other wiki-based sites) that allows users to mark the latest change to a page as a good one (i.e. not vandalism), making things a little easier for fellow Recent Changes patrollers since it's been confirmed that an edit has already been reviewed and approved, so they don't need to look at it again. However, this is entirely a moot point: while the feature is available in the software, it hasn't been implemented on Wikipedia itself (I suppose because it'd be too easy to abuse if left open for any user to okay a change, and/or there aren't enough Administrators (966 at last count) for such a busy site to make it work if it were restricted to Administrator users only). It might be something to look out for in the future, but I can't see it working well on the site as it currently stands. ~[[User:Matticus78|Matticus]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Matticus78|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Matticus78|C]]</sub> 15:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

3270 +++$+++ RashersTierney +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-05 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.267821060E09 +++$+++ Noticed your considerable efforts in this general area and thought I'd extend a hand in thanks. You would be very welcome to join our unfortunately all-too-exclusive 'club'. Best.  +++$+++ Noticed your considerable efforts in this general area and thought I'd extend a hand in thanks. You would be very welcome to join our unfortunately all-too-exclusive 'club'. Best. [[User:RashersTierney|RashersTierney]] ([[User talk:RashersTierney|talk]]) 12:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
3271 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3270 +++$+++ 3270 +++$+++ 2010-03-05 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.267822320E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much, I probably will even though I never planned on getting *this* involved LOL.  +++$+++ :Thanks very much, I probably will even though I never planned on getting *this* involved LOL. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 12:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
3272 +++$+++ RashersTierney +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3270 +++$+++ 3271 +++$+++ 2010-03-05 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.267848840E09 +++$+++ F\xe1ilte romhat!  +++$+++ ::Fáilte romhat! [[User:RashersTierney|RashersTierney]] ([[User talk:RashersTierney|talk]]) 20:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
3273 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3270 +++$+++ 3272 +++$+++ 2010-03-05 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.267850700E09 +++$+++ Of sast\xf3 ;)  +++$+++ :::Of sastó ;) [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 20:45, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

265415 +++$+++ Gay Cdn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265415 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-20 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.153463040E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know about this activity that was targeted against your \"vote\" on the [[Benefiber]] article.  I reverted and added the below to the discussion.  -- +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know about this activity that was targeted against your "vote" on the [[Benefiber]] article.  I reverted and added the below to the discussion.  --[[User:Gay Cdn|Gay Cdn]]  <small>[[User talk:Gay Cdn|(talk)]] [[Special:Emailuser/Gay Cdn|(email)]] [[Special:Contributions/Gay Cdn|(Contr.)]]</small> 23:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
265416 +++$+++ Gay Cdn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265415 +++$+++ 265415 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.153462200E09 +++$+++ '''''Changing a users \"vote\" from Speedy Delete to Keep is EXTREAMLY poor form! Especially when the change is by the article's author! [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Benefiber&diff=next&oldid=64924781]''''' Reverted the page.-- +++$+++ * '''''Changing a users "vote" from Speedy Delete to Keep is EXTREAMLY poor form! Especially when the change is by the article's author! [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Benefiber&diff=next&oldid=64924781]''''' Reverted the page.--[[User:Gay Cdn|Gay Cdn]]  <small>[[User talk:Gay Cdn|(talk)]] [[Special:Emailuser/Gay Cdn|(email)]] [[Special:Contributions/Gay Cdn|(Contr.)]]</small> 23:10, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

527561 +++$+++ Penwhale +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-30 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.175261460E09 +++$+++ Really quick Q: should anyone ever subst {{tl|RFM-Request}}? -  +++$+++ Really quick Q: should anyone ever subst {{tl|RFM-Request}}? - [[User:Penwhale|Penwhale]] &#124; <sup>[[User_talk:Penwhale|Blast him]] / [[Special:Contributions/Penwhale|Follow his steps]]</sup> 06:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
527562 +++$+++ Penwhale +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527561 +++$+++ 527561 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 09:25:00 +++$+++ 1.175271900E09 +++$+++ Quote from [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation\/Guide_to_filing_a_Request_for_Mediation]]: <blockquote>Add <nowiki>{{RFM-Request|Article that is the subject of the request|Name of the mediation case (from the RFM page)}}<\/nowiki> to the talk page of all involved parties.<br>Add <nowiki>{{RFMF|Article that is the subject of the request|Name of the mediation case (from the RFM page)}} to the top of the Article's talk page.<\/nowiki><\/blockquote> Nowhere in there says to subst. -  +++$+++ :Quote from [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Guide_to_filing_a_Request_for_Mediation]]: <blockquote>Add <nowiki>{{RFM-Request|Article that is the subject of the request|Name of the mediation case (from the RFM page)}}</nowiki> to the talk page of all involved parties.<br>Add <nowiki>{{RFMF|Article that is the subject of the request|Name of the mediation case (from the RFM page)}} to the top of the Article's talk page.</nowiki></blockquote> Nowhere in there says to subst. - [[User:Penwhale|Penwhale]] &#124; <sup>[[User_talk:Penwhale|Blast him]] / [[Special:Contributions/Penwhale|Follow his steps]]</sup> 09:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

3274 +++$+++ Maunus +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-07 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.268005260E09 +++$+++ It's probably the same person. As long as they're IP's and they make no attempt at discussion I don't think we should be too afraid of reverting them. Lets just refer to the discussion and consensus at Talk:Selkirk in the edit summary when we revert. +++$+++ It's probably the same person. As long as they're IP's and they make no attempt at discussion I don't think we should be too afraid of reverting them. Lets just refer to the discussion and consensus at Talk:Selkirk in the edit summary when we revert.[[User:Maunus|·Maunus·<span class="Unicode">ƛ</span>·]] 15:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
3275 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3274 +++$+++ 3274 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.268005440E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks for the advice!  +++$+++ :Ok, thanks for the advice! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 15:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
3276 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3274 +++$+++ 3275 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.268005920E09 +++$+++ Even beyond the 3rr? [[Eyemouth]] is just getting silly...  +++$+++ ::Even beyond the 3rr? [[Eyemouth]] is just getting silly... [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 15:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
3277 +++$+++ Maunus +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3274 +++$+++ 3276 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.268009220E09 +++$+++ No, not against 3rr. Then you just wait and let someone else revert as long as there is consensus to keep the placenames other editors will chip in. Also I advice to be more lenient with editors with accounts and IP editors who engaged in discussion.  +++$+++ :::No, not against 3rr. Then you just wait and let someone else revert as long as there is consensus to keep the placenames other editors will chip in. Also I advice to be more lenient with editors with accounts and IP editors who engaged in discussion. [[User:Maunus|·Maunus·<span class="Unicode">ƛ</span>·]] 16:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
3278 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3274 +++$+++ 3277 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.268009400E09 +++$+++ Oops. I think in that case I might just take all the articles on the Borders off my watchlist, it's a touch too depressing, all this uninformed anti-Gaelic sentiment and it's taking up too much of my time. <sigh> POV 1 : Wikipedia 0.  +++$+++ ::::Oops. I think in that case I might just take all the articles on the Borders off my watchlist, it's a touch too depressing, all this uninformed anti-Gaelic sentiment and it's taking up too much of my time. <sigh> POV 1 : Wikipedia 0. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 16:50, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
3279 +++$+++ Maunus +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3274 +++$+++ 3278 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.268009640E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately that is the case, keeping wikipedia neutral is often a really nervewrecking task. But rest assured that if you need a break another rational editor will step in in your place. +++$+++ :::::Unfortunately that is the case, keeping wikipedia neutral is often a really nervewrecking task. But rest assured that if you need a break another rational editor will step in in your place.[[User:Maunus|·Maunus·<span class="Unicode">ƛ</span>·]] 16:54, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

527563 +++$+++ Penwhale +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527563 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-04 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.175686800E09 +++$+++ Should I go ahead and change [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation\/Guide_to_filing_a_Request_for_Mediation]] section and asks people to subst it? -  +++$+++ Should I go ahead and change [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Guide_to_filing_a_Request_for_Mediation]] section and asks people to subst it? - [[User:Penwhale|Penwhale]] &#124; <sup>[[User_talk:Penwhale|Blast him]] / [[Special:Contributions/Penwhale|Follow his steps]]</sup> 04:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
527564 +++$+++ Penwhale +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527563 +++$+++ 527563 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.176420060E09 +++$+++ I'm still awaiting reply on this ;3 -  +++$+++ :I'm still awaiting reply on this ;3 - [[User:Penwhale|Penwhale]] &#124; <sup>[[User_talk:Penwhale|Blast him]] / [[Special:Contributions/Penwhale|Follow his steps]]</sup> 16:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

527565 +++$+++ Sir james paul +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527565 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-31 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.175410080E09 +++$+++ I would like to start closing uncontroversial Mfd's. Is that okay? Answer on my talk page please. Have a nice week. -- +++$+++ I would like to start closing uncontroversial Mfd's. Is that okay? Answer on my talk page please. Have a nice week. --[[User:Sir james paul|James, La gloria è a dio]] 23:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
527566 +++$+++ Sir james paul +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527565 +++$+++ 527565 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.175410800E09 +++$+++ Okay. Good. Thanks. Peace:)-- +++$+++ *Okay. Good. Thanks. Peace:)--[[User:Sir james paul|James, La gloria è a dio]] 00:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
527567 +++$+++  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527565 +++$+++ 527565 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.175413440E09 +++$+++ Special:Recentchanges is at MfD. It is hidden on March 25, but it was still nominated on April 1 <font color=\"maroon\"> +++$+++ :Special:Recentchanges is at MfD. It is hidden on March 25, but it was still nominated on April 1 <font color="maroon">[[User:Mr.Z-man|Mr.Z-man]]</font>'''<small>[[User talk:Mr.Z-man|talk]]</small>''<font color="navy" face="cursive">[[Special:Contributions/Mr.Z-man|¢]]</font>'''''<small>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Mr.Z-man|Review!]]</small> 00:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

265422 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-03 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.157347500E09 +++$+++ Note that if I totally protect your talkpage, you will not be able to ask for protection to be removed. Therefore, your page has been ''semi''-protected, meaning that only established users can edit it.  +++$+++ Note that if I totally protect your talkpage, you will not be able to ask for protection to be removed. Therefore, your page has been ''semi''-protected, meaning that only established users can edit it. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 22:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
265423 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265422 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-03 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.157348640E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much for that.     +++$+++ ::Thank you so much for that.    [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 22:44, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

44237 +++$+++ Foofbun +++$+++ Foofbun +++$+++ 44237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-25 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.264411860E09 +++$+++ I guess what I hate most about the Oz 60 Minutes is this total scumbag journo Richard Carleton was famous for setting people up and intruding big time.  During a press conference he carked it and all his maaaaates covered the area with curtains so no other journos could film the pig meeting his maker, whilst if someone else died he'd be right there mouthing indignation when people would try and stop him... +++$+++ I guess what I hate most about the Oz 60 Minutes is this total scumbag journo Richard Carleton was famous for setting people up and intruding big time.  During a press conference he carked it and all his maaaaates covered the area with curtains so no other journos could film the pig meeting his maker, whilst if someone else died he'd be right there mouthing indignation when people would try and stop him...[[User:Foofbun|Foofbun]] ([[User talk:Foofbun#top|talk]]) 01:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
44238 +++$+++ Foofbun +++$+++ Foofbun +++$+++ 44237 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-25 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.264482900E09 +++$+++ Your remarks on recalling 'Valdez is Coming' brought back memories of the film to me and though I'm a major Burt Lancaster fan I'm wondering how Susan Clark is doing and whether she's still active in Canada.  You never know.  Once in New Caledonia I was in a newsagent (Tabac) and some women's magazine had THE Francois Hardy doing their horoscopes! +++$+++ **Your remarks on recalling 'Valdez is Coming' brought back memories of the film to me and though I'm a major Burt Lancaster fan I'm wondering how Susan Clark is doing and whether she's still active in Canada.  You never know.  Once in New Caledonia I was in a newsagent (Tabac) and some women's magazine had THE Francois Hardy doing their horoscopes![[User:Foofbun|Foofbun]] ([[User talk:Foofbun#top|talk]]) 21:15, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
44239 +++$+++ Varlaam +++$+++ Foofbun +++$+++ 44237 +++$+++ 44237 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.264575960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Varlaam|Varlaam]] ([[User talk:Varlaam|talk]]) 23:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
44240 +++$+++ Foofbun +++$+++ Foofbun +++$+++ 44237 +++$+++ 44239 +++$+++ 2010-01-27 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.264583520E09 +++$+++ Never read the book of Cordura, but I liked the action scene at the beginning (and the tie in song that I had on a Robert Horton Sings! album) and great cast (I wonder why James Darren wasn't in singing the song).  Thought Dick York was injured in his jump from the walls but read it was due to something that happened on the railway car sequence when someone let go of their end of the handle.  I read the author of the book was researching Medal of Honour citations in Southern France with the 3rd Inf Div in WWII so probably based a lot of his things on that.  I interviewed an American paratrooper who was here for a V-J day or something event.  He said there was one MoH awardee in his Regiment and he never attended any reunions as most of the people reckon he got the Medal for something he didn't do. +++$+++ **Never read the book of Cordura, but I liked the action scene at the beginning (and the tie in song that I had on a Robert Horton Sings! album) and great cast (I wonder why James Darren wasn't in singing the song).  Thought Dick York was injured in his jump from the walls but read it was due to something that happened on the railway car sequence when someone let go of their end of the handle.  I read the author of the book was researching Medal of Honour citations in Southern France with the 3rd Inf Div in WWII so probably based a lot of his things on that.  I interviewed an American paratrooper who was here for a V-J day or something event.  He said there was one MoH awardee in his Regiment and he never attended any reunions as most of the people reckon he got the Medal for something he didn't do.[[User:Foofbun|Foofbun]] ([[User talk:Foofbun#top|talk]]) 01:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
44241 +++$+++ Varlaam +++$+++ Foofbun +++$+++ 44237 +++$+++ 44237 +++$+++ 2010-01-27 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.264605960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Varlaam|Varlaam]] ([[User talk:Varlaam|talk]]) 07:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

3280 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-07 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.268009880E09 +++$+++ I'd like to think so but sadly there are numerically more anti-Gaelic crusaders around than neutral ones (not that I don't appreciate your input) when it comes to the [[Scottish Borders]]. At times, they feel more like those calm articles on Basque politics, Northern Ireland and Iraq. But yes, calm down, Aker ;)  +++$+++ I'd like to think so but sadly there are numerically more anti-Gaelic crusaders around than neutral ones (not that I don't appreciate your input) when it comes to the [[Scottish Borders]]. At times, they feel more like those calm articles on Basque politics, Northern Ireland and Iraq. But yes, calm down, Aker ;) [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 16:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
3281 +++$+++ Maunus +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3280 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.268010060E09 +++$+++ As it is he broke the 3rr and not you. I have blocked him for 48 hrs to give him time to reconsider his behaviour. +++$+++ ::::::As it is he broke the 3rr and not you. I have blocked him for 48 hrs to give him time to reconsider his behaviour.[[User:Maunus|·Maunus·<span class="Unicode">ƛ</span>·]] 17:01, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

3283 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-28 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.269799020E09 +++$+++ Hi, is the info in the 2nd paragraph correct? It appeared [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Zechariah_%28given_name%29&diff=prev&oldid=249785631 here] as \"Anglicised Scotch-Gaelic Sachairi\" - added by anon so I'm suspicious. -- +++$+++ Hi, is the info in the 2nd paragraph correct? It appeared [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zechariah_%28given_name%29&diff=prev&oldid=249785631 here] as "Anglicised Scotch-Gaelic Sachairi" - added by anon so I'm suspicious. --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 10:57, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
3284 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3283 +++$+++ 3283 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.269800040E09 +++$+++ Done! You're right, it was... odd.  +++$+++ :Done! You're right, it was... odd. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
3285 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3283 +++$+++ 3284 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.269822120E09 +++$+++ Thanks! -- +++$+++ ::Thanks! --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 17:22, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

3286 +++$+++ MacRusgail +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3286 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.311877860E09 +++$+++ This form appears in the novel, ''[[And the Cock Crew]]'' by [[Fionn MacColla]], I believe.-- +++$+++ This form appears in the novel, ''[[And the Cock Crew]]'' by [[Fionn MacColla]], I believe.--[[User:MacRusgail|MacRusgail]] ([[User talk:MacRusgail|talk]]) 11:31, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
3287 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3286 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311917280E09 +++$+++ Not sure if that's a good source. Is there a Zechariah in the bible?  +++$+++ :::Not sure if that's a good source. Is there a Zechariah in the bible? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 22:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

527575 +++$+++ CaliforniaAliBaba +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-03 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.175585340E09 +++$+++ Can you explain more clearly why this was closed as \"Delete\" given that the article in question met [[WP:ATT]] and [[WP:N]] in general (citations from Taiwan, HK, and mainland newspapers), as well as [[WP:MUSIC]] criteria #1 specifically (nationally charted hit --- a song of his was ranked as the #4 duet nationally by the central television station in a country of 1.3 billion people). The Delete votes consisted of two guys who voted before the article was sourced\/improved, one guy who didn't bother to conduct a proper search and so mistakenly claimed it only had 670 GHits, and one guy with a novel theory, generally not supported by consensus, about how stuff can be notable in one language wiki and not in another. Thanks,  +++$+++ Can you explain more clearly why this was closed as "Delete" given that the article in question met [[WP:ATT]] and [[WP:N]] in general (citations from Taiwan, HK, and mainland newspapers), as well as [[WP:MUSIC]] criteria #1 specifically (nationally charted hit --- a song of his was ranked as the #4 duet nationally by the central television station in a country of 1.3 billion people). The Delete votes consisted of two guys who voted before the article was sourced/improved, one guy who didn't bother to conduct a proper search and so mistakenly claimed it only had 670 GHits, and one guy with a novel theory, generally not supported by consensus, about how stuff can be notable in one language wiki and not in another. Thanks, [[User:CaliforniaAliBaba|cab]] 00:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
527576 +++$+++ CaliforniaAliBaba +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527575 +++$+++ 527575 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.175597160E09 +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Kelvin Kwan}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Kelvin Kwan]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.  +++$+++ : An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Kelvin Kwan}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Kelvin Kwan]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:CaliforniaAliBaba|cab]] 03:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

3288 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-05 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.270498260E09 +++$+++ Sorry for bothering you again, but do you think you could have a look whether this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Goidelic_languages&diff=353721381&oldid=353473938 chain of edits] by a single editor is ''factually'' all right? If so I'll correct the typos myself, but none of it is referenced and there are a few things which make me suspicious, eg 20 as \"fiche\/fichid\" in gd, but what do I know about the rest? -- +++$+++ Sorry for bothering you again, but do you think you could have a look whether this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goidelic_languages&diff=353721381&oldid=353473938 chain of edits] by a single editor is ''factually'' all right? If so I'll correct the typos myself, but none of it is referenced and there are a few things which make me suspicious, eg 20 as "fiche/fichid" in gd, but what do I know about the rest? --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 13:11, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
3289 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3288 +++$+++ 3288 +++$+++ 2010-04-05 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.270501560E09 +++$+++ Broadly speaking he's right; the numbers are tosh as you spotted. I'll amend. Thanks for letting me know.  +++$+++ :Broadly speaking he's right; the numbers are tosh as you spotted. I'll amend. Thanks for letting me know. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 14:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
3290 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3288 +++$+++ 3289 +++$+++ 2010-04-05 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.270508280E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I've done the typos now. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks, I've done the typos now. --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 15:58, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

527578 +++$+++ NicholasTurnbull +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-03 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.175596680E09 +++$+++ It is my personal view one should not close MfD discussions by basically ignoring the discussion and carrying out what you think is best, as it would otherwise render the whole object of MfD - to gain consensus, or to indicate a lack of it if it is not gained - entirely void, and make the outcome entirely a matter of arbitrary decision on the part of the closing administrator. I hope you can, at least, see my perspective that merely a cursory inspection of the discussion shows there is not a consensus to \"Esperanzify\" nor delete the page. If this is your personal opinion, you are of course free to advance it; but you should not close an MfD on that basis. Of course, I am not going to fight whatever you wish to do instead, and I will stand clear of the MfD should you wish to carry out your own actions, as I am not in the habit of wheel-warring. Thank you very much for letting me know, and I do hope you don't consider me hopelessly obstinate for disagreeing. Cheers, -- +++$+++ It is my personal view one should not close MfD discussions by basically ignoring the discussion and carrying out what you think is best, as it would otherwise render the whole object of MfD - to gain consensus, or to indicate a lack of it if it is not gained - entirely void, and make the outcome entirely a matter of arbitrary decision on the part of the closing administrator. I hope you can, at least, see my perspective that merely a cursory inspection of the discussion shows there is not a consensus to "Esperanzify" nor delete the page. If this is your personal opinion, you are of course free to advance it; but you should not close an MfD on that basis. Of course, I am not going to fight whatever you wish to do instead, and I will stand clear of the MfD should you wish to carry out your own actions, as I am not in the habit of wheel-warring. Thank you very much for letting me know, and I do hope you don't consider me hopelessly obstinate for disagreeing. Cheers, --[[User:NicholasTurnbull|Nicholas'''Turnbull''']] | [[User_talk:NicholasTurnbull|(talk)]] 03:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
527579 +++$+++ NicholasTurnbull +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527578 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.175597820E09 +++$+++ In other words, what one is testing is whether there is consensus towards a particular point - you don't insert your own reasoning as a \"tie-breaker\", as it were. If there is no consensus towards any side of the debate (which I think is evident from the discussion) it isn't acceptable to pre-empt this with your own decision making. This is how things on Wikipedia have always been run, I believe, and it isn't something one can circumvent merely because of one's own opinion - which was, at least, how it looked, and your assessment above of your view that the deletion advocates presented a stronger case has no relation to consensus. I am not trying to be argumentative nor unpleasant here, but I do feel you may not fully understand the manner in which Wikipedia precedent considers consensus to exist. Thanks a lot for listening to my rather long diatribe on the subject! Cheers, -- +++$+++ :: In other words, what one is testing is whether there is consensus towards a particular point - you don't insert your own reasoning as a "tie-breaker", as it were. If there is no consensus towards any side of the debate (which I think is evident from the discussion) it isn't acceptable to pre-empt this with your own decision making. This is how things on Wikipedia have always been run, I believe, and it isn't something one can circumvent merely because of one's own opinion - which was, at least, how it looked, and your assessment above of your view that the deletion advocates presented a stronger case has no relation to consensus. I am not trying to be argumentative nor unpleasant here, but I do feel you may not fully understand the manner in which Wikipedia precedent considers consensus to exist. Thanks a lot for listening to my rather long diatribe on the subject! Cheers, --[[User:NicholasTurnbull|Nicholas'''Turnbull''']] | [[User_talk:NicholasTurnbull|(talk)]] 03:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

568527 +++$+++ Mcbishop +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-06 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.152220560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Mcbishop|Mcbishop]] 14:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
568528 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568527 +++$+++ 568527 +++$+++ 2006-07-06 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.152221460E09 +++$+++ If there is enough detail to differentiate each milecastle then individual articles are no problem.  I was thinking that if the articles couldn't be expanded beyond the initial stubs then fifty-plus stubs wouldn't be of the same research value as one milecastle article with the significant features of all seperate milecastles written in to it.  It's great that this is a part of an ongoing project.  I look forward to reading more details! <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :If there is enough detail to differentiate each milecastle then individual articles are no problem.  I was thinking that if the articles couldn't be expanded beyond the initial stubs then fifty-plus stubs wouldn't be of the same research value as one milecastle article with the significant features of all seperate milecastles written in to it.  It's great that this is a part of an ongoing project.  I look forward to reading more details! <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 14:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

3292 +++$+++ Jembana +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3292 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-08 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.270756440E09 +++$+++ Akerbeltz, why did you undo my restore of this link on the Modern Celts page ? Please explain why you made the statement that this was \"totally wrong\". +++$+++ Akerbeltz, why did you undo my restore of this link on the Modern Celts page ? Please explain why you made the statement that this was "totally wrong".[[User:Jembana|Jembana]] ([[User talk:Jembana|talk]]) 12:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
3293 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3292 +++$+++ 3292 +++$+++ 2010-04-08 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.270757340E09 +++$+++ It's on the talk page, check this string [[Talk:Modern_Celts#Speaker_geography]]  +++$+++ :It's on the talk page, check this string [[Talk:Modern_Celts#Speaker_geography]] [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 13:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

612218 +++$+++ Philip Baird Shearer +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-02 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.146587820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the support. -- +++$+++ Thanks for the support. --[[User:Philip Baird Shearer|Philip Baird Shearer]] 09:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
612219 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612218 +++$+++ 612218 +++$+++ 2006-05-02 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.146588180E09 +++$+++ Delighted to see the page in its right place :) .. +++$+++ :Delighted to see the page in its right place :) ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:43, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

3294 +++$+++ Angr +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-14 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.271299920E09 +++$+++ Hey there, are you in a position to add pronunciation info to [[Cladh Hallan]]? My guess is {{IPA-gd|k\u02b0l\u02e0\u032a\u0264\u0263 \u02c8hal\u02e0\u032a\u0259n\u032a\u02e0}} or {{IPA|[\u02c8hal\u02e0\u032aan\u032a\u02e0]}} but I'm not sure which (if either) of those is right. + +++$+++ Hey there, are you in a position to add pronunciation info to [[Cladh Hallan]]? My guess is {{IPA-gd|kʰlˠ̪ɤɣ ˈhalˠ̪ən̪ˠ}} or {{IPA|[ˈhalˠ̪an̪ˠ]}} but I'm not sure which (if either) of those is right. +[[User:Angr|'''An''']][[User talk:Angr|''gr'']] 19:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
3295 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3294 +++$+++ 3294 +++$+++ 2010-04-14 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.271301060E09 +++$+++ Almost. If the above is the correct Gaelic spelling, it should be {{IPA-gd|k\u02b0l\u02e0\u032a\u0264\u0263 \u02c8hal\u02e0\u032a\u0259n}} or {{IPA-gd|k\u02b0l\u02e0\u032a\u0264\u0263 \u02c8hal\u02e0\u032aan}}, it's hard to distinguish unstressed \/a\/ and \/\u0259\/. It looks Norse, so I'd put my money on \/a\/. Does that help?  +++$+++ :Almost. If the above is the correct Gaelic spelling, it should be {{IPA-gd|kʰlˠ̪ɤɣ ˈhalˠ̪ən}} or {{IPA-gd|kʰlˠ̪ɤɣ ˈhalˠ̪an}}, it's hard to distinguish unstressed /a/ and /ə/. It looks Norse, so I'd put my money on /a/. Does that help? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 20:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
3296 +++$+++ Angr +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3294 +++$+++ 3295 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.271336100E09 +++$+++ Well, I'll add {{IPA-gd|k\u02b0l\u02e0\u032a\u0264\u0263 \u02c8hal\u02e0\u032aan}} then and hope for the best. It's certainly closer than the \/klad halan\/ that Russian Wikipedia went for. + +++$+++ ::Well, I'll add {{IPA-gd|kʰlˠ̪ɤɣ ˈhalˠ̪an}} then and hope for the best. It's certainly closer than the /klad halan/ that Russian Wikipedia went for. +[[User:Angr|'''An''']][[User talk:Angr|''gr'']] 05:55, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
3297 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3294 +++$+++ 3296 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.271356860E09 +++$+++ ROFL nice try!  +++$+++ :::ROFL nice try! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:41, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

524837 +++$+++ 65.213.44.2 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-24 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.201169160E09 +++$+++ FYI, the 2 non-fair use images currently in the article are subject to deletion due to disputed fair use rationale. May be you can help? Many thanks [[Special:Contributions\/65.213.44.2|65.213.44.2]] ( +++$+++ FYI, the 2 non-fair use images currently in the article are subject to deletion due to disputed fair use rationale. May be you can help? Many thanks [[Special:Contributions/65.213.44.2|65.213.44.2]] ([[User talk:65.213.44.2|talk]]) 02:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
524838 +++$+++  +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524837 +++$+++ 524837 +++$+++ 2008-01-18 08:40:00 +++$+++ 1.200674400E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 08:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 08:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
524839 +++$+++  +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524837 +++$+++ 524837 +++$+++ 2008-01-18 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.200674580E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 08:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 08:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

265440 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265440 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-12 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.160638320E09 +++$+++ You seemed to me (in the past) a person with real possibilities. Now I wonder as I watch, now that I am no longer willing to put forth any of the hard work way I did before, how you really feel. Deep down, you must feel used by the Wikipedia crap -- (I believe this must be, because I believed in you and still do somewhat.)  +++$+++ You seemed to me (in the past) a person with real possibilities. Now I wonder as I watch, now that I am no longer willing to put forth any of the hard work way I did before, how you really feel. Deep down, you must feel used by the Wikipedia crap -- (I believe this must be, because I believed in you and still do somewhat.) [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 00:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
265441 +++$+++ Netsnipe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265440 +++$+++ 265440 +++$+++ 2006-10-12 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.160666040E09 +++$+++ Well what can you do when it's one of the world's most popular websites? Just walk away? Not me. I just do what I can to keep the other administrators honest by working [[:Category:Requests for unblock]] and giving people second chances all the time. -- <small><span style=\"border: 1px solid\"> +++$+++ :Well what can you do when it's one of the world's most popular websites? Just walk away? Not me. I just do what I can to keep the other administrators honest by working [[:Category:Requests for unblock]] and giving people second chances all the time. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[User:Netsnipe|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#003333"> &nbsp;Netsnipe&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Netsnipe|<span style="background-color:#003333; color:White">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 08:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

3298 +++$+++ 150.203.191.133 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3298 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-22 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.271972580E09 +++$+++ As far as I am aware, I am merely attempting to restore a fact that is continually deleted by another member. They even go as far as deleting my message as to why it was being deleted. I am only attempting to help add to wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions\/150.203.191.133|150.203.191.133]] ( +++$+++ As far as I am aware, I am merely attempting to restore a fact that is continually deleted by another member. They even go as far as deleting my message as to why it was being deleted. I am only attempting to help add to wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions/150.203.191.133|150.203.191.133]] ([[User talk:150.203.191.133|talk]]) 14:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
3299 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3298 +++$+++ 3298 +++$+++ 2010-04-22 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.271972880E09 +++$+++ Nice try.  +++$+++ :Nice try. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 14:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
3300 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3298 +++$+++ 3299 +++$+++ 2010-04-22 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.271973420E09 +++$+++ Sorry but that doesn't pull any weight with me. You consistenly added false information about the Orkneys and some crackpot stuff about Magnus to a large number of pages. That isn't just a case of \"being new and not knowing the ropes\".  +++$+++ ::Sorry but that doesn't pull any weight with me. You consistenly added false information about the Orkneys and some crackpot stuff about Magnus to a large number of pages. That isn't just a case of "being new and not knowing the ropes". [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 14:57, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
3301 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3298 +++$+++ 3298 +++$+++ 2010-04-22 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.271973840E09 +++$+++ Well, on the offchance you're being serious, Wikipedia does not accept blogs and similar sites as \"sources\". Think about it - you can post ANYthing in a blog.  +++$+++ :Well, on the offchance you're being serious, Wikipedia does not accept blogs and similar sites as "sources". Think about it - you can post ANYthing in a blog. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 15:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
3302 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3298 +++$+++ 3298 +++$+++ 2010-04-22 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.271974440E09 +++$+++ Hm ok. Feel free to contribute, but do look around first before you make massive changes, ok?  +++$+++ :Hm ok. Feel free to contribute, but do look around first before you make massive changes, ok? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 15:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

527587 +++$+++ BuickCenturyDriver +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527587 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-04 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.175728080E09 +++$+++ Why do you begin your name with a carat.  In [[BASIC]] it mean to raise to a power.  \u2191demon looks better.  +++$+++ Why do you begin your name with a carat.  In [[BASIC]] it mean to raise to a power.  ↑demon looks better. [[User:BuickCenturyDriver|BuickCenturyDriver]] <small>([[User_talk:BuickCenturyDriver|Honk]], [[Special:Contributions/BuickCenturyDriver|contribs]], <span class="plainlinks">[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username=BuickCenturyDriver&amp;site=en.wikipedia.org odometer]</span>)</small> 16:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
527588 +++$+++ Mousey.Mouse +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527587 +++$+++ 527587 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.175992260E09 +++$+++ Really? Well, that's quite interesting. Do you happen to know who wrote it?  +++$+++ :Really? Well, that's quite interesting. Do you happen to know who wrote it? [[User:Mousey.Mouse|<font face="Lucida Calligraphy" font color="#B57EDC">'''Squ'''</font>]][[User_talk:Mousey.Mouse|<font face="Lucida Calligraphy" font color="#FFA000">'''eak'''</font>]] 17:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

265444 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-14 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.160890080E09 +++$+++ Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:28, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
265445 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265444 +++$+++ 265444 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.160954100E09 +++$+++ There doesn't seem to be a great deal online about Wayanad.  That actually makes me a bit happy, since it is such a beautiful place and it deserves better than to become overrun with tourists ;-).  Sorry about that, we are writing an encyclopedia.  Banasura Sagar dam is located on a [[tributary]] of the [[Panamaram river]], which itself is a tributary of [[Kabini river]].  I don't know the name of the tributary which flows out of the Banasura sagar dam.  Note Kabini = Kabani.  There are two small hydel projects in Wayanad, I don't know whether either are operational.  Hope that helps.  -- +++$+++ :There doesn't seem to be a great deal online about Wayanad.  That actually makes me a bit happy, since it is such a beautiful place and it deserves better than to become overrun with tourists ;-).  Sorry about that, we are writing an encyclopedia.  Banasura Sagar dam is located on a [[tributary]] of the [[Panamaram river]], which itself is a tributary of [[Kabini river]].  I don't know the name of the tributary which flows out of the Banasura sagar dam.  Note Kabini = Kabani.  There are two small hydel projects in Wayanad, I don't know whether either are operational.  Hope that helps.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 16:15, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
265446 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265444 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.160961420E09 +++$+++ While you are \"in the area\", there are two pictures that I recommend that you click on to get the full size image.  The first is at [[Edakkal Caves]].  Click and look for the hole in the mountain!  The second is the picture of the elephant at [[Wayanad district#Geographical details]] article.  Click for full size, isn't she sweet?  :-).  -- +++$+++ :::While you are "in the area", there are two pictures that I recommend that you click on to get the full size image.  The first is at [[Edakkal Caves]].  Click and look for the hole in the mountain!  The second is the picture of the elephant at [[Wayanad district#Geographical details]] article.  Click for full size, isn't she sweet?  :-).  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

527590 +++$+++ Steel359 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-08 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.176024420E09 +++$+++ I obviously have an idea what it's getting at but, just out of interest, is there any particular significance to the quote and padlock on your userpage? &ndash;  +++$+++ I obviously have an idea what it's getting at but, just out of interest, is there any particular significance to the quote and padlock on your userpage? &ndash; [[User:Steel359|Steel]] 02:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
527591 +++$+++ Steel359 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527590 +++$+++ 527590 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.176025140E09 +++$+++ And here's me thinking it had some deep philosophical meaning. &ndash;  +++$+++ :And here's me thinking it had some deep philosophical meaning. &ndash; [[User:Steel359|Steel]] 02:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

3303 +++$+++ Garcilaso +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-23 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.272039720E09 +++$+++ Dear Akerbeltz: My fault that I don\xb4t check wikipedia as often as I should... so I couldn\xb4t point out that in your definitive list of Basque terms, you still stick to the akward \xc1lavese which you had ,agreed that made no sense. \xc1lavese isn\xb4t accurate in any language, neither orthographically nor phonetically. In Spanish it would be Alav\xe9s, stressed on the last syllable, in English the written accent doesn\xb4t exist. Why not plainly ''Alavese''? -- +++$+++ Dear Akerbeltz: My fault that I don´t check wikipedia as often as I should... so I couldn´t point out that in your definitive list of Basque terms, you still stick to the akward Álavese which you had ,agreed that made no sense. Álavese isn´t accurate in any language, neither orthographically nor phonetically. In Spanish it would be Alavés, stressed on the last syllable, in English the written accent doesn´t exist. Why not plainly ''Alavese''? --[[User:Garcilaso|Garcilaso]] ([[User talk:Garcilaso|talk]]) 09:22, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
3304 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3303 +++$+++ 3303 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.272048300E09 +++$+++ Well spotted, my mistake, I've corrected it. Thanks for letting me know!  +++$+++ :Well spotted, my mistake, I've corrected it. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:45, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
3305 +++$+++ Garcilaso +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3303 +++$+++ 3304 +++$+++ 2010-04-26 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.272347100E09 +++$+++ ;-)   +++$+++ :: ;-)  [[User:Garcilaso|Garcilaso]] ([[User talk:Garcilaso|talk]]) 22:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

265448 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265448 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-15 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.160964660E09 +++$+++ It is fine with me if you put the picture on the [[Kalpetta]] page.  I am reluctant to promote my own images.  Also, there are several drawbacks to that particular image.  First, you can't really see the elephant or how beautiful is the forest, unless you see the full size image.  Second, I don't know the official extent of Kalpetta, so it may not be ''completely'' appropriate.  But then again, most of the nearby attractions are not within Kalpetta limits either.  Maybe it should go in the nearby attractions subsection. -- +++$+++ It is fine with me if you put the picture on the [[Kalpetta]] page.  I am reluctant to promote my own images.  Also, there are several drawbacks to that particular image.  First, you can't really see the elephant or how beautiful is the forest, unless you see the full size image.  Second, I don't know the official extent of Kalpetta, so it may not be ''completely'' appropriate.  But then again, most of the nearby attractions are not within Kalpetta limits either.  Maybe it should go in the nearby attractions subsection. --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 19:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
265449 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265448 +++$+++ 265448 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.160966340E09 +++$+++ \"Countryside near Kalpetta\" would be an accurate description.  I am ''alas'' at work at the moment.  However, when I get home, if I am not too tired, and don't forget, I will look to see if I have any more images that might be worth uploading.  You can take a look.  They would mostly be of Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu.  I try to avoid putting friends and family online, and unfortunately, many pictures do have friends and family.  We will see in a few hours.  -- +++$+++ :"Countryside near Kalpetta" would be an accurate description.  I am ''alas'' at work at the moment.  However, when I get home, if I am not too tired, and don't forget, I will look to see if I have any more images that might be worth uploading.  You can take a look.  They would mostly be of Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu.  I try to avoid putting friends and family online, and unfortunately, many pictures do have friends and family.  We will see in a few hours.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 19:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

3306 +++$+++ Cube lurker +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3306 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-28 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.272439200E09 +++$+++ I replied to your attack.  I removed most of the profanity before I hit save.-- +++$+++ I replied to your attack.  I removed most of the profanity before I hit save.--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 00:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
3307 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3306 +++$+++ 3306 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.272439500E09 +++$+++ Excuse me, attack? Are we reading the same wiki?  +++$+++ :Excuse me, attack? Are we reading the same wiki? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 00:25, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
3308 +++$+++ Cube lurker +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3306 +++$+++ 3307 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.272439920E09 +++$+++ Where you called me a hypocrite.-- +++$+++ ::Where you called me a hypocrite.--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 00:32, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

3309 +++$+++ Sluzzelin +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3309 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-28 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.272478920E09 +++$+++ After having read a sensible remark of yours, I clicked on your userpage (also because I was curious about your [[Akelarre (witchcraft)|name]] :), and, as it happens, we currently have [[Wikipedia:Reference_desk\/Language#What_does_the_word_.22Macaulish.22_mean.3F74.60.75.235_.28talk.29_08:32.2C_28_April_2010_.28UTC.29|a question at the language desk]] which could use your expertise! --- +++$+++ After having read a sensible remark of yours, I clicked on your userpage (also because I was curious about your [[Akelarre (witchcraft)|name]] :), and, as it happens, we currently have [[Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Language#What_does_the_word_.22Macaulish.22_mean.3F74.60.75.235_.28talk.29_08:32.2C_28_April_2010_.28UTC.29|a question at the language desk]] which could use your expertise! ---[[User:Sluzzelin|Sluzzelin]] [[User talk:Sluzzelin|<small>talk</small>]] 11:22, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
3310 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3309 +++$+++ 3309 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.272479520E09 +++$+++ The name, well, my first name is so common I have up using it in the early days of chatting on IRC. I tried a few others and Akerbeltz stuck, that's it really. ;)  +++$+++ :The name, well, my first name is so common I have up using it in the early days of chatting on IRC. I tried a few others and Akerbeltz stuck, that's it really. ;) [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:32, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
3311 +++$+++ Sluzzelin +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3309 +++$+++ 3310 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.272489540E09 +++$+++ Thanks! (It was one or two comments suggesting that it might help our product, the encyclopedia, if we shifted our focus toward how to improve content and away from who broke which rules and how to sanction them adequately. Too lazy to find the diff ;)--- +++$+++ ::Thanks! (It was one or two comments suggesting that it might help our product, the encyclopedia, if we shifted our focus toward how to improve content and away from who broke which rules and how to sanction them adequately. Too lazy to find the diff ;)---[[User:Sluzzelin|Sluzzelin]] [[User talk:Sluzzelin|<small>talk</small>]] 14:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
3312 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3309 +++$+++ 3311 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.272489900E09 +++$+++ You're welcome on both accounts - I know what you mean now. Yes... pity that. Ah well, nothing is perfect. It might push me off the English Wiki though and over to the Gaelic one in time if it gets worse.  +++$+++ :::You're welcome on both accounts - I know what you mean now. Yes... pity that. Ah well, nothing is perfect. It might push me off the English Wiki though and over to the Gaelic one in time if it gets worse. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 14:25, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
3313 +++$+++ Cube lurker +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3309 +++$+++ 3312 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.272490020E09 +++$+++ Sadly you both miss the point.-- +++$+++ ::::Sadly you both miss the point.--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 14:27, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
3314 +++$+++ Sluzzelin +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3309 +++$+++ 3313 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.272490980E09 +++$+++ Perhaps I do, and perhaps it is sad. I can certainly agree that I often miss the whole point of WP:ANI. Anyway, this aside was parenthetical and had nothing to do with why I posted here. I meant no offense to you, Cube lurker. --- +++$+++ :::::Perhaps I do, and perhaps it is sad. I can certainly agree that I often miss the whole point of WP:ANI. Anyway, this aside was parenthetical and had nothing to do with why I posted here. I meant no offense to you, Cube lurker. ---[[User:Sluzzelin|Sluzzelin]] [[User talk:Sluzzelin|<small>talk</small>]] 14:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

527599 +++$+++ Shadowbot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.176772980E09 +++$+++ Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Signaleer! However, your edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:%5Edemon&diff=123309637&oldid=122947933 here] was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove [[WP:SPAM|spam]] from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \\bmembers\\.aol\\.com\\\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read [[WP:EL|Wikipedia's external links policy]] for more information. If the link was to an image, please read [[WP:IMAGE|Wikipedia's image tutorial]] on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see [[User:Shadowbot\/FAQ|my FAQ page]]. Thanks!  +++$+++ Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Signaleer! However, your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:%5Edemon&diff=123309637&oldid=122947933 here] was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove [[WP:SPAM|spam]] from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bmembers\.aol\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read [[WP:EL|Wikipedia's external links policy]] for more information. If the link was to an image, please read [[WP:IMAGE|Wikipedia's image tutorial]] on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see [[User:Shadowbot/FAQ|my FAQ page]]. Thanks! [[User:Shadowbot|Shadowbot]] 18:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
527600 +++$+++ Signaleer +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527599 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.176773460E09 +++$+++ In reference to your response, I've already contacted the owner of the bot.  I am aware of how to insert an image, this was not the case.  The site is not affiliated with myself, I've explained the fact that the site is featured on the official U.S. Army Fort Leavenworth Buffalo Soldier Monument external link on the webpage which apparently you did not look at, thanks but no thanks for the help. - +++$+++ ::In reference to your response, I've already contacted the owner of the bot.  I am aware of how to insert an image, this was not the case.  The site is not affiliated with myself, I've explained the fact that the site is featured on the official U.S. Army Fort Leavenworth Buffalo Soldier Monument external link on the webpage which apparently you did not look at, thanks but no thanks for the help. -[[User:Signaleer|Signaleer]] 18:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

265456 +++$+++ Ekajati +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265456 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-18 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.161237120E09 +++$+++ I did not place that tag. It was placed by an admin. You are required to leave it there. You ran those sockpuppets, removing admin placed tags and warnings is not allowed. I will continue to put it back. If you keep removing it, I will bring it to the attention of the admins that you are doing so.  +++$+++ I did not place that tag. It was placed by an admin. You are required to leave it there. You ran those sockpuppets, removing admin placed tags and warnings is not allowed. I will continue to put it back. If you keep removing it, I will bring it to the attention of the admins that you are doing so. [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] ([[User talk:Ekajati|yakity-yak]]) 22:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
265457 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265456 +++$+++ 265456 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.161239040E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser\/Case\/Listerin]] already established that you are indeed a sockpuppet. There's no point in trying to hide it when I can just go to your block log and see your history.  +++$+++ :[[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Listerin]] already established that you are indeed a sockpuppet. There's no point in trying to hide it when I can just go to your block log and see your history. [[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">'''Nish'''</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">'''kid'''</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">'''64'''</span>]] 23:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
265458 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265456 +++$+++ 265457 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.161239160E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  I'm sorry that you have a puppetmaster tag.  But please don't make trouble for yourself.  I think the proper thing is to wait a bit, let tempers cool, then go to an admin and ask the admin to remove the tag, but please don't remove it yourself, or it will motivate people against you.  Just trying to help.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Hi Mattisse.  I'm sorry that you have a puppetmaster tag.  But please don't make trouble for yourself.  I think the proper thing is to wait a bit, let tempers cool, then go to an admin and ask the admin to remove the tag, but please don't remove it yourself, or it will motivate people against you.  Just trying to help.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
265459 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265456 +++$+++ 265458 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.161239460E09 +++$+++ Seriously, please revert yourself and take a short break, catch your breath, and think things over.  Please.  -- +++$+++ :::Seriously, please revert yourself and take a short break, catch your breath, and think things over.  Please.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
265460 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265456 +++$+++ 265458 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.161240120E09 +++$+++ Please, who do you trust?  Go talk to someone you trust, and let them know what is going on.  Please don't make me sad.  -- +++$+++ :::Please, who do you trust?  Go talk to someone you trust, and let them know what is going on.  Please don't make me sad.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
265461 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265456 +++$+++ 265456 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.161240300E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Stop_hand.svg|left|30px]] This is your '''last warning'''. <br>The next time you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] a page, you ''will'' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Test4 (Fourth level warning) -->   +++$+++ :[[Image:Stop_hand.svg|left|30px]] This is your '''last warning'''. <br>The next time you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] a page, you ''will'' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Test4 (Fourth level warning) -->  [[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">'''Nish'''</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">'''kid'''</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">'''64'''</span>]] 23:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
265462 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265456 +++$+++ 265461 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.161240720E09 +++$+++ I fully protected the page so only sysops can edit or move.  +++$+++ ::I fully protected the page so only sysops can edit or move. [[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">'''Nish'''</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">'''kid'''</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">'''64'''</span>]] 23:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
265463 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265456 +++$+++ 265462 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.161241560E09 +++$+++ I've got to got to bed now. But I'll see if we can sort out the situation. Its not at all clear whether old sockpuppet notices have to remain on user pages. Which is being discussed on [[WP:ANI]].  -- +++$+++ :::I've got to got to bed now. But I'll see if we can sort out the situation. Its not at all clear whether old sockpuppet notices have to remain on user pages. Which is being discussed on [[WP:ANI]].  --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 00:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
265464 +++$+++ TenOfAllTrades +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265456 +++$+++ 265456 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.161241620E09 +++$+++ You ''can'' weigh in at that discussion, but I would strongly recommend that you simply keep an eye on its progress.  In my experience, you will harm your case if you make anything more than succinct, ''very'' polite remarks.  +++$+++ :You ''can'' weigh in at that discussion, but I would strongly recommend that you simply keep an eye on its progress.  In my experience, you will harm your case if you make anything more than succinct, ''very'' polite remarks. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 00:07, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

524840 +++$+++ 76.199.65.126 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524840 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-24 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.201171260E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/76.199.65.126|76.199.65.126]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/76.199.65.126|76.199.65.126]] ([[User talk:76.199.65.126|talk]]) 02:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
524841 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524840 +++$+++ 524840 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.201213140E09 +++$+++ Addressed, I think. If not, we'll talk it over with the nominator. On a side note, did I mention how useful a user account is? Get one, while they're going cheap! Be the first on your IP block... :-) -- +++$+++ : Addressed, I think. If not, we'll talk it over with the nominator. On a side note, did I mention how useful a user account is? Get one, while they're going cheap! Be the first on your IP block... :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
524842 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524840 +++$+++ 524841 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.201240740E09 +++$+++ Ah, I knew we had to have one of these. [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?]] -- +++$+++ :: Ah, I knew we had to have one of these. [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?]] --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 21:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
524843 +++$+++ Mineros +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524840 +++$+++ 524842 +++$+++ 2008-01-26 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.201407180E09 +++$+++ Took me a while to come with a username that I can stick to. +++$+++ :::Took me a while to come with a username that I can stick to.[[User:Mineros|Mineros]] ([[User talk:Mineros|talk]]) 20:13, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

3315 +++$+++ Cube lurker +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-28 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.272491040E09 +++$+++ It's probably a waste of time but I'll take one stab at explaining this.  The key point is this.  To be an admin it to have a set of tools, not have a superior status.  If I were to come into work, and in my cubicle there was a pneumatic jackhammer instead of my computer what would be the responsible thing for me to do.  I have no understanding of the proper use of that tool.  It would be irresponsible to use that tool when I'd only do more damage than good.  It wouldn't be a \"sanction\" to tell my boss that I should not have that tool.-- +++$+++ It's probably a waste of time but I'll take one stab at explaining this.  The key point is this.  To be an admin it to have a set of tools, not have a superior status.  If I were to come into work, and in my cubicle there was a pneumatic jackhammer instead of my computer what would be the responsible thing for me to do.  I have no understanding of the proper use of that tool.  It would be irresponsible to use that tool when I'd only do more damage than good.  It wouldn't be a "sanction" to tell my boss that I should not have that tool.--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 14:44, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
3316 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3315 +++$+++ 3315 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.272491280E09 +++$+++ I probably have to mirror that sentiment. My point - the one you're missing - is that whether one used the right tool or the wrong tool has to be seen in the light of what needs fixing in the garage. To quote an old adage, there's no point in paiting the door when the roof is on fire. Yes, kwami used the wrong tool. Get over it. There are way worse things happening on Wikipedia that deserve admin attention.  +++$+++ :I probably have to mirror that sentiment. My point - the one you're missing - is that whether one used the right tool or the wrong tool has to be seen in the light of what needs fixing in the garage. To quote an old adage, there's no point in paiting the door when the roof is on fire. Yes, kwami used the wrong tool. Get over it. There are way worse things happening on Wikipedia that deserve admin attention. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 14:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
3317 +++$+++ Cube lurker +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3315 +++$+++ 3316 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.272491640E09 +++$+++ You seem to be hung up on the protection which isn't even the concern I brought out?-- +++$+++ ::You seem to be hung up on the protection which isn't even the concern I brought out?--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 14:54, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
3318 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3315 +++$+++ 3317 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.272492000E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I really don't have time for this. You're clearly getting really worked up about something that in the big scheme of things seems to me to be mostly pointless and I have no wish to do harm to my deadlines and your blood pressure so I'm tuning out of this one. Funny thing though, human history - times, kings and queens may change but administrators somehow never do, there's always a rulebook to throw...  +++$+++ :::Sorry, I really don't have time for this. You're clearly getting really worked up about something that in the big scheme of things seems to me to be mostly pointless and I have no wish to do harm to my deadlines and your blood pressure so I'm tuning out of this one. Funny thing though, human history - times, kings and queens may change but administrators somehow never do, there's always a rulebook to throw... [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 15:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
3319 +++$+++ Cube lurker +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3315 +++$+++ 3318 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.272492360E09 +++$+++ No i'm relaxed now.  As I said it was a waste of time.  Horse, water, drinking all that.-- +++$+++ ::::No i'm relaxed now.  As I said it was a waste of time.  Horse, water, drinking all that.--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 15:06, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
3320 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3315 +++$+++ 3319 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.272492960E09 +++$+++ At least on that point we're 100% agreed ;)  +++$+++ :::::At least on that point we're 100% agreed ;) [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 15:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

527605 +++$+++ Alison +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527605 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-24 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.177481460E09 +++$+++ ... is only awesome! Excellent work :) -  +++$+++ ... is only awesome! Excellent work :) - [[User:Alison|<font face="comic sans ms" color="green">Alison</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Alison|☺]]</sup> 23:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
527606 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527605 +++$+++ 527605 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.177498560E09 +++$+++ Agreed! Great timesaver. Any way of putting it into MediaWiki, for people whose monobooks are funny? &ndash; <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ :Agreed! Great timesaver. Any way of putting it into MediaWiki, for people whose monobooks are funny? &ndash; <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:Riana|Riana]] <sup>[[User talk:Riana|<font color="seagreen">ऋ</font>]]</sup></span> 03:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
527607 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527605 +++$+++ 527606 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.177662840E09 +++$+++ I quite agree. Did you look at the extra links in the version of the list of reasons I posted to its talk page? if so, what did you think of them?  +++$+++ ::I quite agree. Did you look at the extra links in the version of the list of reasons I posted to its talk page? if so, what did you think of them? [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 01:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
527608 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527605 +++$+++ 527607 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.177663260E09 +++$+++ Fine. Glad you liked them. Didn't mean to imply a rush. Thanks again for this tool.  +++$+++ :::Fine. Glad you liked them. Didn't mean to imply a rush. Thanks again for this tool. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 01:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

3321 +++$+++ Uhanu +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-13 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.273741440E09 +++$+++ Finally I wanted to refer to article [[Basque bowls]]; although there are modalities such as Cantabrian Bolo Palma or Bolo Burgal\xe9s or Leon\xe9s wich have been imported by migrants to Euskadi, they should not go under the Basque bowling title in my opinion. Other border variants such as Pasabolo tabl\xf3n from Cantabria, Biscay and Burgos could be. And please I beg you, put the Cantabrian flag in the article Bolo Palma. This sport is not a tradicional basque bowl. In fact this is the only sport where the Cantabrian Federation, not the Spanish neither Basque, is the highest representative. And unlike other bowls or sports, the basque terms are not official neither used, the few players in biscay are Cantabrian or descendants. Greetings, I hope you understand my position and sorry for my english :). +++$+++ Finally I wanted to refer to article [[Basque bowls]]; although there are modalities such as Cantabrian Bolo Palma or Bolo Burgalés or Leonés wich have been imported by migrants to Euskadi, they should not go under the Basque bowling title in my opinion. Other border variants such as Pasabolo tablón from Cantabria, Biscay and Burgos could be. And please I beg you, put the Cantabrian flag in the article Bolo Palma. This sport is not a tradicional basque bowl. In fact this is the only sport where the Cantabrian Federation, not the Spanish neither Basque, is the highest representative. And unlike other bowls or sports, the basque terms are not official neither used, the few players in biscay are Cantabrian or descendants. Greetings, I hope you understand my position and sorry for my english :).[[User:Uhanu|Uhanu]] ([[User talk:Uhanu|talk]]) 02:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
3322 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3321 +++$+++ 3321 +++$+++ 2010-05-13 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.273773180E09 +++$+++ I look forward to improving those pages, nice for someone else to lend a hand!  +++$+++ :I look forward to improving those pages, nice for someone else to lend a hand! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 10:53, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
3323 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3321 +++$+++ 3322 +++$+++ 2010-05-13 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.273773300E09 +++$+++ PS once we've decided on an umbrella page, I'm quite agreeable to a new section on the [[Basque bowls]] page along the lines of \"other variants also played (but not Basque in origin)\".  +++$+++ ::PS once we've decided on an umbrella page, I'm quite agreeable to a new section on the [[Basque bowls]] page along the lines of "other variants also played (but not Basque in origin)". [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 10:55, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

265467 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-18 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.161240840E09 +++$+++ For you! -- +++$+++ For you! --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
265468 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265467 +++$+++ 265467 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.161241740E09 +++$+++ But on the other subject, you may be absolutely right that the sock accusation is inappropriate.  But getting into an edit war over a lousy tag on your user page, especially with an admin, isn't worth it.  You can deal with the sock accusation tomorrow if you aren't blocked, but if you get yourself blocked, things just start going down hill. :-(.  -- +++$+++ :But on the other subject, you may be absolutely right that the sock accusation is inappropriate.  But getting into an edit war over a lousy tag on your user page, especially with an admin, isn't worth it.  You can deal with the sock accusation tomorrow if you aren't blocked, but if you get yourself blocked, things just start going down hill. :-(.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 00:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

3324 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-13 08:47:00 +++$+++ 1.273765620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 08:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
3325 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3324 +++$+++ 3324 +++$+++ 2010-05-13 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.273771920E09 +++$+++ Kaixo I\xf1aki, good to see you back! When we started the debate several months back, I posted notices on various project pages and article pages (I don't recall all of them but definitely WikiProject Basque, France and Spain) to invite broad participation. You're right, it wasn't a massive debate but I feel the result is very workable and acceptable and I'm loathe to restart the debate as it would set a bad precedent. Is there any aspect of the result that you're unhappy with?  +++$+++ :Kaixo Iñaki, good to see you back! When we started the debate several months back, I posted notices on various project pages and article pages (I don't recall all of them but definitely WikiProject Basque, France and Spain) to invite broad participation. You're right, it wasn't a massive debate but I feel the result is very workable and acceptable and I'm loathe to restart the debate as it would set a bad precedent. Is there any aspect of the result that you're unhappy with? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 10:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
3326 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3324 +++$+++ 3325 +++$+++ 2010-05-15 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.273991400E09 +++$+++ Kaixo Akerbeltz, zelan??? Still feeling driven to contribute sometimes while I have to confess my enthusiasm has faded. I happened to find this note about the debate on naming in the \xc1lava discussion tab (you can check the article, some paragraphs added), but didn't know anything. I'd appreciate if you let me know directly since it's quite a major debate on a matter I deal with almost every time I contribute (and let's face it, it's almost you and me and some bits of other people). Didn't read it all but the conclusions look pretty fine with me (this \"Guip\xfazcoa\" thing for instance straight from Spanish was, let me put it this way, quite alienating, as if we had to keep calling Rhodesia and not Zimbabwe because of the tradition... Gero arte  +++$+++ ::Kaixo Akerbeltz, zelan??? Still feeling driven to contribute sometimes while I have to confess my enthusiasm has faded. I happened to find this note about the debate on naming in the Álava discussion tab (you can check the article, some paragraphs added), but didn't know anything. I'd appreciate if you let me know directly since it's quite a major debate on a matter I deal with almost every time I contribute (and let's face it, it's almost you and me and some bits of other people). Didn't read it all but the conclusions look pretty fine with me (this "Guipúzcoa" thing for instance straight from Spanish was, let me put it this way, quite alienating, as if we had to keep calling Rhodesia and not Zimbabwe because of the tradition... Gero arte [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 23:30, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

265470 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-19 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.161245220E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed that you stated that Parambakulam dam was on the Kabini.  I hope you don't mind, I know you are not from the area, but I got something of a laugh out of that.  Anyway, I found a link that you might find useful [http:\/\/www.rainwaterharvesting.org\/resources\/statistics\/stat233.htm].  Haven't checked it for complete accuracy, but I imagine it is quite accurate.  Enjoy.  -- +++$+++ Hi, I noticed that you stated that Parambakulam dam was on the Kabini.  I hope you don't mind, I know you are not from the area, but I got something of a laugh out of that.  Anyway, I found a link that you might find useful [http://www.rainwaterharvesting.org/resources/statistics/stat233.htm].  Haven't checked it for complete accuracy, but I imagine it is quite accurate.  Enjoy.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 01:07, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
265471 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265470 +++$+++ 265470 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.161248940E09 +++$+++ I understand.  Take care.  -- +++$+++ :I understand.  Take care.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 02:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

3327 +++$+++ RashersTierney +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3327 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-20 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.274405940E09 +++$+++ I applied the template at [[Talk:Scottish Travellers]] per your suggestion. However, the Talk Page does not appear to have been part of the re-direct. The proposed move is being read as already carried out I assume for that reason. Am I making this more complicated than necessary? Best.  +++$+++ I applied the template at [[Talk:Scottish Travellers]] per your suggestion. However, the Talk Page does not appear to have been part of the re-direct. The proposed move is being read as already carried out I assume for that reason. Am I making this more complicated than necessary? Best. [[User:RashersTierney|RashersTierney]] ([[User talk:RashersTierney|talk]]) 18:39, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
3328 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3327 +++$+++ 3327 +++$+++ 2010-05-20 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.274410980E09 +++$+++ Not entirely sure what happened there - I'll ask an admin to help out since it's uncontroversial I think.  +++$+++ :Not entirely sure what happened there - I'll ask an admin to help out since it's uncontroversial I think. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 20:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
3329 +++$+++ RashersTierney +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3327 +++$+++ 3328 +++$+++ 2010-05-20 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.274412000E09 +++$+++ Many thanks.  +++$+++ ::Many thanks. [[User:RashersTierney|RashersTierney]] ([[User talk:RashersTierney|talk]]) 20:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
3330 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3327 +++$+++ 3327 +++$+++ 2010-05-23 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.274665080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note. I'm not going to edit war over this, it's not such a major issue. Historically and traditionally, the spellings with two capitals are predominant, same as they are in Gaelic. The non-capitalised forms appear much later. And i'd urge caution as to whom you believe in issues of spelling - a local history society may not be the best authority, especially (and i speak from experience here) since people involved in these are often not highly computer literate and fall prey to Microsoft word which will automatically remove any word internal capital whether appropriate or not. But as I said, I'm not going to argue.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the note. I'm not going to edit war over this, it's not such a major issue. Historically and traditionally, the spellings with two capitals are predominant, same as they are in Gaelic. The non-capitalised forms appear much later. And i'd urge caution as to whom you believe in issues of spelling - a local history society may not be the best authority, especially (and i speak from experience here) since people involved in these are often not highly computer literate and fall prey to Microsoft word which will automatically remove any word internal capital whether appropriate or not. But as I said, I'm not going to argue. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 18:38, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

265473 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-19 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.161302100E09 +++$+++ Go to [www.vedamsbooks.com] and try key word [[Chalukya]]. You will find several listings of books written by good authors. +++$+++ Go to [www.vedamsbooks.com] and try key word [[Chalukya]]. You will find several listings of books written by good authors.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 16:55, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
265474 +++$+++ Septegram +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265473 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.161300300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Septegram|Septegram]] 16:25, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
265475 +++$+++ Septegram +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265473 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.161307140E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Septegram|Septegram]] 18:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

3331 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-27 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.275011820E09 +++$+++ Someone has added a reference to Scotland for Koch, John ''[http:\/\/ifc.dpz.es\/recursos\/publicaciones\/29\/54\/26koch.pdf Tartessian: Celtic from the Southwest at the Dawn of History]'' (pdf)  (2009) which has a piquancy that sir may find amusing.  +++$+++ Someone has added a reference to Scotland for Koch, John ''[http://ifc.dpz.es/recursos/publicaciones/29/54/26koch.pdf Tartessian: Celtic from the Southwest at the Dawn of History]'' (pdf)  (2009) which has a piquancy that sir may find amusing. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 18:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
3332 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3331 +++$+++ 3331 +++$+++ 2010-05-30 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.275243360E09 +++$+++ Yarg, just what the world needed x.x  +++$+++ :Yarg, just what the world needed x.x [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:16, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

3333 +++$+++ 192.87.123.13 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-01 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.275410820E09 +++$+++ I don't know what to say. You helped me more than I deserved. I am no expert with bytes and pixels. I know how to surf, mail and print, but that is all. Nevertheless I wrote many books. They are on the Royal Library in The Hague and I wrote many articles (www.google.com and fill in: zeelandnet pieter kuhn; and click, etc.). Thank you very much for your patience and support. Lex Ritman[[Special:Contributions\/192.87.123.13|192.87.123.13]] ( +++$+++ I don't know what to say. You helped me more than I deserved. I am no expert with bytes and pixels. I know how to surf, mail and print, but that is all. Nevertheless I wrote many books. They are on the Royal Library in The Hague and I wrote many articles (www.google.com and fill in: zeelandnet pieter kuhn; and click, etc.). Thank you very much for your patience and support. Lex Ritman[[Special:Contributions/192.87.123.13|192.87.123.13]] ([[User talk:192.87.123.13|talk]]) 09:47, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
3334 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3333 +++$+++ 3333 +++$+++ 2010-06-01 10:28:00 +++$+++ 1.275413280E09 +++$+++ You're welcome :)  +++$+++ :You're welcome :) [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 10:28, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

3336 +++$+++ Capsot +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3336 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-07 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.275920400E09 +++$+++ Kaixo, I hope you're doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. I've just read your profile and you seemed a very learned person and interested in (small) languages so maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... I'm part of an association \"Amical de la Viquip\xe8dia\" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this hasn't been approved up to that moment. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: [[Template:Wikimedia CAT|Wikimedia CAT]]. Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care!  +++$+++ Kaixo, I hope you're doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. I've just read your profile and you seemed a very learned person and interested in (small) languages so maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... I'm part of an association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this hasn't been approved up to that moment. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: [[Template:Wikimedia CAT|Wikimedia CAT]]. Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care! [[User:Capsot|Capsot]] ([[User talk:Capsot|talk]]) 07:20, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
3337 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3336 +++$+++ 3336 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.276014600E09 +++$+++ Com va aix\xf2? I'm not entirely sure what the purpose of being recognised as a Catalan Chapter is - could you explain or link to somewhere where I can read up on it?  +++$+++ :Com va això? I'm not entirely sure what the purpose of being recognised as a Catalan Chapter is - could you explain or link to somewhere where I can read up on it? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 09:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
3338 +++$+++ Capsot +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3336 +++$+++ 3337 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.276264560E09 +++$+++ Kaixo\/Bon dia, I see with great pleasure that you also know some Catalan! Sorry I hadn't seen your reply since it's your talk page, that's why it took me so long to tell you more about it. Here go more information about the Catalan Chapter project: [[M:Wikimedia chapters|secci\xf3 local de Wikimedia]] and [http:\/\/www.viquimedia.cat Amical Viquip\xe8dia ]. You can also see the current support which is really good in the Catalan, in the Occitan and Basque Wikipedias: [ca:Categoria:Viquipedistes que donen suport a Wikimedia CAT]. It is a really active association and many projects are interesting. In English unfortunately I lose a lot of time trying to find the more appropriate profiles of the people who might be interested in language, minorities or Catalan issues. I hope this will prove interesting to you. Take care and thanks\/eskerrik asko for your interest. Have a nice day and weekend!  +++$+++ :: Kaixo/Bon dia, I see with great pleasure that you also know some Catalan! Sorry I hadn't seen your reply since it's your talk page, that's why it took me so long to tell you more about it. Here go more information about the Catalan Chapter project: [[M:Wikimedia chapters|secció local de Wikimedia]] and [http://www.viquimedia.cat Amical Viquipèdia ]. You can also see the current support which is really good in the Catalan, in the Occitan and Basque Wikipedias: [ca:Categoria:Viquipedistes que donen suport a Wikimedia CAT]. It is a really active association and many projects are interesting. In English unfortunately I lose a lot of time trying to find the more appropriate profiles of the people who might be interested in language, minorities or Catalan issues. I hope this will prove interesting to you. Take care and thanks/eskerrik asko for your interest. Have a nice day and weekend! [[User:Capsot|Capsot]] ([[User talk:Capsot|talk]]) 06:56, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

524844 +++$+++ Zahakiel +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524844 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-25 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.201312380E09 +++$+++ Hello; I notice that you are an administrator that has had some involvement in the \"Requests for comment\" page regarding philosophy and religion.  A week or so ago I attempted to get a RfC going on the talk page for the [[Nontrinitarian]] article, as an editor keeps removing an entry to the list of non-Trinitarian Churches that I believe is a legitimate addition, and certainly meets all the policies I have yet read for such an inclusion.  The RfC was initially tied to [[Talk:Nontrinitarianism#RfC_on_inclusion_of_small_group|this section]] of the talk page.  The problem is that the RfC never showed up on the list, a bot removed the RfC tag from the talk page, and the editor once again removed the list (citing \"per talk page\" this time, though nothing changed on the talk page).  Perhaps you can let me know what error I made in attempting to get the Request for Comment listed?  I added the tag to the page as indicated in the instructions, and expected that a bot would take care of it from there.  Thanks. [[User_talk:Zahakiel|<span style=\"text-decoration:none\">\u25c4<\/span>]] +++$+++ Hello; I notice that you are an administrator that has had some involvement in the "Requests for comment" page regarding philosophy and religion.  A week or so ago I attempted to get a RfC going on the talk page for the [[Nontrinitarian]] article, as an editor keeps removing an entry to the list of non-Trinitarian Churches that I believe is a legitimate addition, and certainly meets all the policies I have yet read for such an inclusion.  The RfC was initially tied to [[Talk:Nontrinitarianism#RfC_on_inclusion_of_small_group|this section]] of the talk page.  The problem is that the RfC never showed up on the list, a bot removed the RfC tag from the talk page, and the editor once again removed the list (citing "per talk page" this time, though nothing changed on the talk page).  Perhaps you can let me know what error I made in attempting to get the Request for Comment listed?  I added the tag to the page as indicated in the instructions, and expected that a bot would take care of it from there.  Thanks. [[User_talk:Zahakiel|<span style="text-decoration:none">◄</span>]][[User:Zahakiel|<font color = "indigo"><span style="text-decoration:none">Zahakiel</span></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Zahakiel|<span style="text-decoration:none">►</span>]] 17:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
524845 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524844 +++$+++ 524844 +++$+++ 2008-01-25 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.201319820E09 +++$+++ Good question. The only thing I can think of is that you should give the section title in the section= link, not the whole page plus section. I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Nontrinitarianism&diff=prev&oldid=186872827 restored it, with today's date], let's see if it shows up the next time BetacommandBot or RFCBot run. Also let me read up on the issue and see if I can weigh in. -- +++$+++ : Good question. The only thing I can think of is that you should give the section title in the section= link, not the whole page plus section. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nontrinitarianism&diff=prev&oldid=186872827 restored it, with today's date], let's see if it shows up the next time BetacommandBot or RFCBot run. Also let me read up on the issue and see if I can weigh in. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 19:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

3339 +++$+++ Jonas Poole +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-08 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.275994080E09 +++$+++ Kurlansky's a fool. He used secondary sources and didn't bother check his facts. The Basques were not in the New World in the 14th century. No evidence. None. I didn't feel like putting up a reference. Mrs. Barkham has a paper from 1984 about Basque whaling in Terranova. Don't feel like looking for it. And, yes. I will revert it back if you edit it again. Find a primary source (which I know doesn't exist) that says the Basques were whaling in the New World in the 14th century (which I know they weren't).  +++$+++ Kurlansky's a fool. He used secondary sources and didn't bother check his facts. The Basques were not in the New World in the 14th century. No evidence. None. I didn't feel like putting up a reference. Mrs. Barkham has a paper from 1984 about Basque whaling in Terranova. Don't feel like looking for it. And, yes. I will revert it back if you edit it again. Find a primary source (which I know doesn't exist) that says the Basques were whaling in the New World in the 14th century (which I know they weren't). [[User:Jonas Poole|Jonas Poole]] ([[User talk:Jonas Poole|talk]]) 03:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
3340 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3339 +++$+++ 3339 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.276014540E09 +++$+++ Slow down, I realise that Kurlansky as a historical source is not idea and I'm quite happy to take it out if someone can make a persuasive argument but just an Edit Summary was a bit... curt. Given how many copies he's selling, I would also suggest that your point, which appears to be backed up by other research, is better served by making the point that \"although some like Kurlansky claim that they were, they weren't\" is a better way forward because someone else might put it back in (not a threat, just an observation).  +++$+++ :Slow down, I realise that Kurlansky as a historical source is not idea and I'm quite happy to take it out if someone can make a persuasive argument but just an Edit Summary was a bit... curt. Given how many copies he's selling, I would also suggest that your point, which appears to be backed up by other research, is better served by making the point that "although some like Kurlansky claim that they were, they weren't" is a better way forward because someone else might put it back in (not a threat, just an observation). [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 09:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

3342 +++$+++ Comhar +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3342 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-17 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.276801080E09 +++$+++ Hi,  I spent several hours trying to make better links for the above article. and using the 'preview' button.  However, when I finally went to save them, all my changes reverted saying that there was editorial conflict because another user had edited in the interim.  This seems to have been you, so I'm not sure what I can do apart from start again?  Any ideas?   Thanks if you can help  +++$+++ Hi,  I spent several hours trying to make better links for the above article. and using the 'preview' button.  However, when I finally went to save them, all my changes reverted saying that there was editorial conflict because another user had edited in the interim.  This seems to have been you, so I'm not sure what I can do apart from start again?  Any ideas?   Thanks if you can help [[User:Comhar|Comhar]] ([[User talk:Comhar|talk]]) 11:58, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
3343 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3342 +++$+++ 3342 +++$+++ 2010-06-17 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.276803480E09 +++$+++ If you're making such large edits, it's better to use your sandbox so you can save in betweentimes!  +++$+++ :If you're making such large edits, it's better to use your sandbox so you can save in betweentimes! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 12:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

3344 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3344 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-23 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.277344200E09 +++$+++ Hi, after your FnaG explanation it occurred to me Czech '''\u0165''' might be more closely approximant to [t\u02b2] as in -irt\/-ist than '''\u010f''', so I looked it up [[\u0164|here]] which led me [[Voiceless palatal plosive#Occurrence|here]]. The page gives ''ceann'' pronounced as [c\u02b0\u025bun\u02e0], which surprised me; I'd sooner believe Colin Mark's [k\u02b2aun\u0334\u032a]. Is [c\u02b0\u025bun\u02e0] an alternative or an error? -- +++$+++ Hi, after your FnaG explanation it occurred to me Czech '''ť''' might be more closely approximant to [tʲ] as in -irt/-ist than '''ď''', so I looked it up [[Ť|here]] which led me [[Voiceless palatal plosive#Occurrence|here]]. The page gives ''ceann'' pronounced as [cʰɛunˠ], which surprised me; I'd sooner believe Colin Mark's [kʲaun̴̪]. Is [cʰɛunˠ] an alternative or an error? --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 18:50, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
3345 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3344 +++$+++ 3344 +++$+++ 2010-06-24 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.277422380E09 +++$+++ Yurg, well spotted. Looks like a leftover from the spate of edits on scots gaelic by irish editors we had at one point. I still don't agree with their analysis of Irish stops but I'm too shaky on Irish phonology. But at least they stopped messing with the gaelic for the most part. Grma!  +++$+++ :Yurg, well spotted. Looks like a leftover from the spate of edits on scots gaelic by irish editors we had at one point. I still don't agree with their analysis of Irish stops but I'm too shaky on Irish phonology. But at least they stopped messing with the gaelic for the most part. Grma! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 16:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

527633 +++$+++ Steel359 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-04 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.178333340E09 +++$+++ Hi ^demon. Would you object if I took [[User:^demon\/csd.js|your csd.js]] and made a page protection version of it? I'll give credit where it's due, of course. &ndash;  +++$+++ Hi ^demon. Would you object if I took [[User:^demon/csd.js|your csd.js]] and made a page protection version of it? I'll give credit where it's due, of course. &ndash; [[User:Steel359|Steel]] 19:49, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
527634 +++$+++ Steel359 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527633 +++$+++ 527633 +++$+++ 2007-05-04 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.178333580E09 +++$+++ Good, because I've already made it <tt>:P<\/tt> &ndash;  +++$+++ :Good, because I've already made it <tt>:P</tt> &ndash; [[User:Steel359|Steel]] 19:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
527635 +++$+++ Steel359 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527633 +++$+++ 527633 +++$+++ 2007-05-04 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.178333820E09 +++$+++ [[User:Steel359\/^demon.js|There we go]]. &ndash;  +++$+++ :[[User:Steel359/^demon.js|There we go]]. &ndash; [[User:Steel359|Steel]] 19:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

3346 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-24 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.277423940E09 +++$+++ Do you have one of your groovy \"pronunciation\" files for ''Na h-Eileanan Siar'' for [[Outer Hebrides]] etc?  +++$+++ Do you have one of your groovy "pronunciation" files for ''Na h-Eileanan Siar'' for [[Outer Hebrides]] etc? [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 16:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
3347 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3346 +++$+++ 3346 +++$+++ 2010-06-24 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.277425500E09 +++$+++ LOL not ready made and i'm not back home till tomorrow but I'll make one over the w\/e. Remind me if I forget! Anywhere else you're likely to want one made soon? Easier doing them in batches.  +++$+++ :LOL not ready made and i'm not back home till tomorrow but I'll make one over the w/e. Remind me if I forget! Anywhere else you're likely to want one made soon? Easier doing them in batches. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 17:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
3348 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3346 +++$+++ 3347 +++$+++ 2010-06-25 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.277476920E09 +++$+++ ''Comhairle nan Eilean Siar'' might also be useful. If you can be bothered the names in the list of [[Outer Hebrides#Populated islands]] could be used there, in the [[List of Outer Hebrides]] and on the island pages themselves. ''An t-Eilean Fada'' also.  +++$+++ ::''Comhairle nan Eilean Siar'' might also be useful. If you can be bothered the names in the list of [[Outer Hebrides#Populated islands]] could be used there, in the [[List of Outer Hebrides]] and on the island pages themselves. ''An t-Eilean Fada'' also. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 07:42, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
3349 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3346 +++$+++ 3348 +++$+++ 2010-06-26 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.277601660E09 +++$+++ I've done Comhairle nan Eilean Siar, Na h-Eileanan Siar, Na h-Eileanan an Iar and An t-Eilean Fada. I'll add them to [[Outer Hebrides]].  +++$+++ :::I've done Comhairle nan Eilean Siar, Na h-Eileanan Siar, Na h-Eileanan an Iar and An t-Eilean Fada. I'll add them to [[Outer Hebrides]]. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 18:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
3350 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3346 +++$+++ 3348 +++$+++ 2010-06-26 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.277602140E09 +++$+++ PS you might want to add one of them to the header, perhaps also on the Western Isles article?  +++$+++ :::PS you might want to add one of them to the header, perhaps also on the Western Isles article? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 18:29, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
3351 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3346 +++$+++ 3350 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.277737560E09 +++$+++ Many thanks again - will get to this asap.  +++$+++ ::::Many thanks again - will get to this asap. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 08:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

576228 +++$+++ Lupo +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-20 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.198181160E09 +++$+++ Are you sure that the image used in this article, [[:Image:Wind River Peak.jpg]], shows Wind River Peak? According to the USGS main image page [http:\/\/libraryphoto.cr.usgs.gov\/cgi-bin\/show_picture.cgi?ID=ID.%20Gaskill,%20D.L.%20%20393ct for that image], it shows \"[[Fremont Peak (Wyoming)|Fremont Peak]]. View north northeast over Seneca Lake, Wind River Mountains. Sublette County, Wyoming, n.d.\" That's consistent with the geography. Seneca Lake is at [http:\/\/www.topozone.com\/map.asp?lat=43.05472&lon=-109.65722&datum=nad27&u=7&layer=DRG&size=l&s=500 N43.05472, W109.65722], NNE lies Fremont Peak, whereas Wind River Peak is [http:\/\/www.topozone.com\/map.asp?lat=42.708&lon=-109.128&datum=nad27&u=7&layer=DRG&size=l&s=1000 much farther south] and probably not even visible from Seneca Lake. (On that second map, Seneca Lake would be beyond the top left corner (NW).) BTW, the image was taken by David L. Gaskill, a USGS employee. Going by the very similar image [http:\/\/libraryphoto.cr.usgs.gov\/cgi-bin\/show_picture.cgi?ID=ID.%20Gaskill,%20D.L.%20%20415ct here], I would say it was taken in September 1966.  +++$+++ Are you sure that the image used in this article, [[:Image:Wind River Peak.jpg]], shows Wind River Peak? According to the USGS main image page [http://libraryphoto.cr.usgs.gov/cgi-bin/show_picture.cgi?ID=ID.%20Gaskill,%20D.L.%20%20393ct for that image], it shows "[[Fremont Peak (Wyoming)|Fremont Peak]]. View north northeast over Seneca Lake, Wind River Mountains. Sublette County, Wyoming, n.d." That's consistent with the geography. Seneca Lake is at [http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?lat=43.05472&lon=-109.65722&datum=nad27&u=7&layer=DRG&size=l&s=500 N43.05472, W109.65722], NNE lies Fremont Peak, whereas Wind River Peak is [http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?lat=42.708&lon=-109.128&datum=nad27&u=7&layer=DRG&size=l&s=1000 much farther south] and probably not even visible from Seneca Lake. (On that second map, Seneca Lake would be beyond the top left corner (NW).) BTW, the image was taken by David L. Gaskill, a USGS employee. Going by the very similar image [http://libraryphoto.cr.usgs.gov/cgi-bin/show_picture.cgi?ID=ID.%20Gaskill,%20D.L.%20%20415ct here], I would say it was taken in September 1966. [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] 12:06, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
576229 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576228 +++$+++ 576228 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.198201500E09 +++$+++ Weird...I must have really messed up that one...I wonder why I thought that was Wind River Peak...I orginally uploaded that image in 2005. I have asked an admin at commons to move the image to it's proper place [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Wsiegmund#Image:Wind_River_Peak.jpg].-- +++$+++ :Weird...I must have really messed up that one...I wonder why I thought that was Wind River Peak...I orginally uploaded that image in 2005. I have asked an admin at commons to move the image to it's proper place [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wsiegmund#Image:Wind_River_Peak.jpg].--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] ([[User talk:MONGO#top|talk]]) 17:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
576230 +++$+++ Lupo +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576228 +++$+++ 576229 +++$+++ 2007-12-21 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.198263540E09 +++$+++ Well, you could have told me... :-) Anyway, even admins cannot move images. The only way is to download and reupload the image (though maybe we have a bot somewhere for doing this). In this case, I've simply uploaded [[:Image:Fremont Peak (Wind River Range).jpg]] and tagged [[:Image:Wind_River_Peak.jpg]] for speedy deletion.  +++$+++ ::Well, you could have told me... :-) Anyway, even admins cannot move images. The only way is to download and reupload the image (though maybe we have a bot somewhere for doing this). In this case, I've simply uploaded [[:Image:Fremont Peak (Wind River Range).jpg]] and tagged [[:Image:Wind_River_Peak.jpg]] for speedy deletion. [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] 10:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
576231 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576228 +++$+++ 576230 +++$+++ 2007-12-22 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.198367820E09 +++$+++ Sorry Lupo, I forgot about you on that one. Thanks for straightening that image out for us.-- +++$+++ :::Sorry Lupo, I forgot about you on that one. Thanks for straightening that image out for us.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] ([[User talk:MONGO#top|talk]]) 15:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

527640 +++$+++ Picaroon9288 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-07 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.178607480E09 +++$+++ Hi ^demon. I've closed the [[Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion\/Log\/2007 April 29#Template:Appears in:DB|tfd]] you started on the Dragonball templates, so could I request that your bot orphan the the templates? There are quite a bunch, which is why I think a bot is the best solution. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi ^demon. I've closed the [[Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007 April 29#Template:Appears in:DB|tfd]] you started on the Dragonball templates, so could I request that your bot orphan the the templates? There are quite a bunch, which is why I think a bot is the best solution. Thanks, [[User:Picaroon9288|Picaroon]] [[User talk:Picaroon9288|(Talk)]] 23:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
527641 +++$+++ Picaroon9288 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527640 +++$+++ 527640 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.178680320E09 +++$+++ The four codes, DB, DBGT, DBZ, and DB Movie, correspond to three versions of the show and the show's movie. I think replacing the templates with plain text stating what movie(s) the characters appear in is the best solution (As you mentioned in your nom, these symbols mean nothing to those unfamiliar to the show; words, however, mean something to everybody who can read English.) For example, {{tl|Appears in:DB, DBZ}} would be replaced with \"<nowiki>Appears in [[Dragon Ball]] and [[Dragon Ball Z]]<\/nowiki>\", and so on. How does this sound? Can a bot do that?  +++$+++ :The four codes, DB, DBGT, DBZ, and DB Movie, correspond to three versions of the show and the show's movie. I think replacing the templates with plain text stating what movie(s) the characters appear in is the best solution (As you mentioned in your nom, these symbols mean nothing to those unfamiliar to the show; words, however, mean something to everybody who can read English.) For example, {{tl|Appears in:DB, DBZ}} would be replaced with "<nowiki>Appears in [[Dragon Ball]] and [[Dragon Ball Z]]</nowiki>", and so on. How does this sound? Can a bot do that? [[User:Picaroon9288|Picaroon]] [[User talk:Picaroon9288|(Talk)]] 20:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

3353 +++$+++ Deibid +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-09 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.278682020E09 +++$+++ Kaixo Akerbeltz! we continue the war about the map... the last vandal was specially rough, did you see the comment? \"hasta la polla de tanto nacionalismo\" This is sad, we should do something about this, the article should be protected against these kind of actions. We have to make clear that the map is not about nationalism... it is a better map and it was there before all the rest, PUNTO! Ai ama! sick of it all!  +++$+++ Kaixo Akerbeltz! we continue the war about the map... the last vandal was specially rough, did you see the comment? "hasta la polla de tanto nacionalismo" This is sad, we should do something about this, the article should be protected against these kind of actions. We have to make clear that the map is not about nationalism... it is a better map and it was there before all the rest, PUNTO! Ai ama! sick of it all! [[User:Deibid|David]] ([[User talk:Deibid|talk]]) 06:27, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
3354 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3353 +++$+++ 3353 +++$+++ 2010-07-09 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.278689640E09 +++$+++ Ados... not sure about permanent protection but I'll have a look around and see what can be done, it's getting silly.  +++$+++ :Ados... not sure about permanent protection but I'll have a look around and see what can be done, it's getting silly. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 08:34, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

527642 +++$+++ Simesa +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-08 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.178613480E09 +++$+++ You deleted this picture [[:Image:Nuclear Power Plant 2 cropped.jpg]], giving the reason in [[Nuclear Power]] as \"(Removing image using NPWatcher. Reason given was: \"Per CSD I3 - image has an invalid license\".)\"  I obtained that picture and it was released for unrestricted use - I had a fair amount of trouble getting it.  Before I go to the Deletion Review process, would you please restore it and put an appropriate license tag on it?   +++$+++ You deleted this picture [[:Image:Nuclear Power Plant 2 cropped.jpg]], giving the reason in [[Nuclear Power]] as "(Removing image using NPWatcher. Reason given was: "Per CSD I3 - image has an invalid license".)"  I obtained that picture and it was released for unrestricted use - I had a fair amount of trouble getting it.  Before I go to the Deletion Review process, would you please restore it and put an appropriate license tag on it?  [[User:Simesa|Simesa]] 01:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
527643 +++$+++ Simesa +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527642 +++$+++ 527642 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.178613840E09 +++$+++ Nevermind -- They swapped pictures on me, mine is just fine.  The one above is a cropping of a different picture.  I'll let that picture's author decide what to do himself.  Thanks, sorry for the confusion.  +++$+++ :Nevermind -- They swapped pictures on me, mine is just fine.  The one above is a cropping of a different picture.  I'll let that picture's author decide what to do himself.  Thanks, sorry for the confusion. [[User:Simesa|Simesa]] 01:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

3355 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3355 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-10 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.278821340E09 +++$+++ Could you check the draft of the deleted section? I plan on restoring it soon. \u2014  +++$+++ Could you check the draft of the deleted section? I plan on restoring it soon. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 21:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
3356 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3355 +++$+++ 3355 +++$+++ 2010-07-10 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.278824820E09 +++$+++ Will do.  +++$+++ :Will do. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 22:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

265500 +++$+++ Ekajati +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265500 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-24 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.161752460E09 +++$+++ Why the heck are you wasting your time trying to twist other people's arms rather the just continuing on working on the articles you've been working on is simply a mystery to me. Seems you enjoy telling other people what to do. Well, stop. It's not appreciated by anyone. I'd say what I think about you, but it would violate [[WP:CIVIL]]. Please go do something more productive, and quit with the socks already.  +++$+++ Why the heck are you wasting your time trying to twist other people's arms rather the just continuing on working on the articles you've been working on is simply a mystery to me. Seems you enjoy telling other people what to do. Well, stop. It's not appreciated by anyone. I'd say what I think about you, but it would violate [[WP:CIVIL]]. Please go do something more productive, and quit with the socks already. [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] ([[User talk:Ekajati|yakity-yak]]) 22:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
265501 +++$+++ TomTheHand +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265500 +++$+++ 265500 +++$+++ 2006-10-24 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.161756780E09 +++$+++ Ekajati, you need to take a step back and stop taking Mattisse's tagging as an attack on the article.  It is meant as a way of bringing the problem (lack of citations) to the attention of the article's contributors.  According to [[WP:V]] the burden of proof is on the article's contributors to provide sources.  Mattisse didn't write the article; how can you expect her to know where the information in it came from?  +++$+++ :Ekajati, you need to take a step back and stop taking Mattisse's tagging as an attack on the article.  It is meant as a way of bringing the problem (lack of citations) to the attention of the article's contributors.  According to [[WP:V]] the burden of proof is on the article's contributors to provide sources.  Mattisse didn't write the article; how can you expect her to know where the information in it came from? [[User:TomTheHand|TomTheHand]] 23:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
265502 +++$+++ William M. Connolley +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265500 +++$+++ 265501 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.161820140E09 +++$+++ If this is indeed M's motivation, then she should proceed differently, and put a note on the talk page and discuss it there. People tend to view the tags as more of an attack when placed on the article itself  +++$+++ :: If this is indeed M's motivation, then she should proceed differently, and put a note on the talk page and discuss it there. People tend to view the tags as more of an attack when placed on the article itself [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 16:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
265503 +++$+++ TomTheHand +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265500 +++$+++ 265502 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.161825660E09 +++$+++ I feel placing tags on the article itself draws extra attention to the fact that the article doesn't cite properly.  Yes, it's ugly, and it's saying something negative about the article.  The proper reaction to that is to fix the article so that there's no reason to tag it.  +++$+++ :::I feel placing tags on the article itself draws extra attention to the fact that the article doesn't cite properly.  Yes, it's ugly, and it's saying something negative about the article.  The proper reaction to that is to fix the article so that there's no reason to tag it. [[User:TomTheHand|TomTheHand]] 18:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
265504 +++$+++ Maury Markowitz +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265500 +++$+++ 265503 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.161840420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::[[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury]] 22:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
265505 +++$+++ TomTheHand +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265500 +++$+++ 265504 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.161846660E09 +++$+++ I don't think so.  Yes, there are some cases where WP:V can be satisfied without inline references. This is not one of those cases.  +++$+++ :::::I don't think so.  Yes, there are some cases where WP:V can be satisfied without inline references. This is not one of those cases. [[User:TomTheHand|TomTheHand]] 00:11, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
265506 +++$+++ Maury Markowitz +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265500 +++$+++ 265500 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.161891300E09 +++$+++ Well perhaps I should have kept my post to the real argument alone. The issue here isn't about right and wrong, it's about civility. If this behaviour leads to edit wars and blocks (and it's not just here, it's all over the wiki), is it worth it? I personally think edit wars are worse for the wiki than poor style.  +++$+++ :Well perhaps I should have kept my post to the real argument alone. The issue here isn't about right and wrong, it's about civility. If this behaviour leads to edit wars and blocks (and it's not just here, it's all over the wiki), is it worth it? I personally think edit wars are worse for the wiki than poor style. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury]] 12:35, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

3358 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-23 08:11:00 +++$+++ 1.279897860E09 +++$+++ zer moduz? I found the reference on the Roma and the Kalderash. I think a link could be set up to the Caldereros festival from Donostia, maybe from the Erromintxela article too, while the latter it's pretty linguistic. You have developed the subject, so what do you think? Jaso agur bero bat  +++$+++ zer moduz? I found the reference on the Roma and the Kalderash. I think a link could be set up to the Caldereros festival from Donostia, maybe from the Erromintxela article too, while the latter it's pretty linguistic. You have developed the subject, so what do you think? Jaso agur bero bat [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 08:11, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
3359 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3358 +++$+++ 3358 +++$+++ 2010-07-25 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.280086260E09 +++$+++ Ondo, bereziki Euskara nire blackberry berrian lorta ta gero ;) Jog my memory on which reference we were looking for? But as long as it's a good ref I'm quite happy for you to go ahead and add\/link. Izan untsa!  +++$+++ :Ondo, bereziki Euskara nire blackberry berrian lorta ta gero ;) Jog my memory on which reference we were looking for? But as long as it's a good ref I'm quite happy for you to go ahead and add/link. Izan untsa! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 12:31, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
3360 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3358 +++$+++ 3359 +++$+++ 2010-08-03 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.280883900E09 +++$+++ Hey kaixo there, Euskara mugikorrean..., well a small feat hehe. I just happened to find this Kalderash subgroup of the Roma in an article of yours (Erromintxela?) and just sprang to mind that since they specialized in hardware and were smiths (well..., an the name) they might as well be related to the Calderero festival of Donostia. But not sure about it, just wanted to confirm, you know sth about it?  +++$+++ :: Hey kaixo there, Euskara mugikorrean..., well a small feat hehe. I just happened to find this Kalderash subgroup of the Roma in an article of yours (Erromintxela?) and just sprang to mind that since they specialized in hardware and were smiths (well..., an the name) they might as well be related to the Calderero festival of Donostia. But not sure about it, just wanted to confirm, you know sth about it? [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 18:05, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
3361 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3358 +++$+++ 3358 +++$+++ 2010-07-25 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.280086320E09 +++$+++ Ah right, no worries, thanks for letting me know!  +++$+++ :Ah right, no worries, thanks for letting me know! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 12:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

527649 +++$+++ Selket +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-09 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.178695380E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you deleted [[Image:2142 hud.JPG]] as having an invalid fair use tag.  I was looking over it when it was deleted.  I was about to clear the CSD label.  I was wondering if you could say why you think it was invalid?  --''' +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you deleted [[Image:2142 hud.JPG]] as having an invalid fair use tag.  I was looking over it when it was deleted.  I was about to clear the CSD label.  I was wondering if you could say why you think it was invalid?  --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 00:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
527650 +++$+++ Selket +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527649 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.178695560E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks.  --''' +++$+++ ::Ok, thanks.  --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 00:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

3362 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3362 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-25 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.280100900E09 +++$+++ I've created [[Bearasaigh]], which I expected to be a 3-line stub - amazing what these little lumps of rock have to say for themselves. Could you provide a  translation of the name?  +++$+++ I've created [[Bearasaigh]], which I expected to be a 3-line stub - amazing what these little lumps of rock have to say for themselves. Could you provide a  translation of the name? [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 16:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
3363 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3362 +++$+++ 3362 +++$+++ 2010-07-25 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.280102520E09 +++$+++ LOL. I can do you a sound file but as for translation, tricky. It has no obvious Gaelic meaning (along the lines of \"big rock, black rock\" etc) and the -aigh ending screams Norse and it bears a passing resemblence to Bearaig ([[Berwick]]) but surface forms can be misleading - and \"barley island\" sounds a little far-fetched for this small lump of rock. I checked briefly and I don't seem to have any references to the etymology anywhere so I'm afraid I'll have to pass for now but if I do find something, I'll add it.  +++$+++ :LOL. I can do you a sound file but as for translation, tricky. It has no obvious Gaelic meaning (along the lines of "big rock, black rock" etc) and the -aigh ending screams Norse and it bears a passing resemblence to Bearaig ([[Berwick]]) but surface forms can be misleading - and "barley island" sounds a little far-fetched for this small lump of rock. I checked briefly and I don't seem to have any references to the etymology anywhere so I'm afraid I'll have to pass for now but if I do find something, I'll add it. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 17:02, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
3364 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3362 +++$+++ 3363 +++$+++ 2010-07-25 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.280102760E09 +++$+++ Your luck is in... edit forthcoming  +++$+++ ::Your luck is in... edit forthcoming [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 17:06, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
3365 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3362 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-25 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.280103240E09 +++$+++ Many thanks - makes perfect sense.  +++$+++ :::::Many thanks - makes perfect sense. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 17:14, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
3366 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3362 +++$+++ 3362 +++$+++ 2010-08-05 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.281057420E09 +++$+++ Hiya! Made up \"phonetics\" are discouraged but I agree that a sound file would help; I'll create one over the weekend, too busy right now.  +++$+++ :Hiya! Made up "phonetics" are discouraged but I agree that a sound file would help; I'll create one over the weekend, too busy right now. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 18:17, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

612230 +++$+++ Cactus.man +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-09 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.147228620E09 +++$+++ There's definitely a connection in there somewhere. Duddingston Loch is well known for skating and curling in the 19th century. The Tower is also reputed to be where the rules of curling were first written down, and Thomson was a contemporary of Raeburn, mixing in the same circles. Warrants further research. --<font color=\"2B7A2B\"> +++$+++ There's definitely a connection in there somewhere. Duddingston Loch is well known for skating and curling in the 19th century. The Tower is also reputed to be where the rules of curling were first written down, and Thomson was a contemporary of Raeburn, mixing in the same circles. Warrants further research. --<font color="2B7A2B">[[User:Cactus.man|Cactus<b>.</b>man]]</font> <font size="4">[[User talk:Cactus.man|&#9997;]]</font> 19:37, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
612231 +++$+++ Cactus.man +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612230 +++$+++ 612230 +++$+++ 2006-05-10 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.147289640E09 +++$+++ I've also sourced some Scotsman material that provides a bit of a link between Raeburn and Thomson, plus a nice quote from Turner: \"By God sir, I envy you that piece of water\". Still working out how to work it into the article properly, so the skating Rev may yet still make an appearance - watch that space ''':'''-) --<font color=\"2B7A2B\"> +++$+++ :I've also sourced some Scotsman material that provides a bit of a link between Raeburn and Thomson, plus a nice quote from Turner: "By God sir, I envy you that piece of water". Still working out how to work it into the article properly, so the skating Rev may yet still make an appearance - watch that space ''':'''-) --<font color="2B7A2B">[[User:Cactus.man|Cactus<b>.</b>man]]</font> <font size="4">[[User talk:Cactus.man|&#9997;]]</font> 12:34, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
612232 +++$+++ Cactus.man +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612230 +++$+++ 612231 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.147362840E09 +++$+++ Dave, I've expanded the [[Reverend John Thomson]] article a bit and worked in a reference to the Skating Rev. in a trivia section based on the strong connections with the Loch, studio, skating, curling etc. Would be grateful if you could give it the once over and comment on the worth of inclusion. I am worried that it's still too remote from the article topic. Comments welcome. --<font color=\"2B7A2B\"> +++$+++ ::Dave, I've expanded the [[Reverend John Thomson]] article a bit and worked in a reference to the Skating Rev. in a trivia section based on the strong connections with the Loch, studio, skating, curling etc. Would be grateful if you could give it the once over and comment on the worth of inclusion. I am worried that it's still too remote from the article topic. Comments welcome. --<font color="2B7A2B">[[User:Cactus.man|Cactus<b>.</b>man]]</font> <font size="4">[[User talk:Cactus.man|&#9997;]]</font> 08:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
612233 +++$+++ Cactus.man +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612230 +++$+++ 612232 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 10:26:00 +++$+++ 1.147368360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the comments, good advice as usual. I've tweaked the article as necessary, and you're right, Wikipedia is just electrons and magnetic storage. --<font color=\"2B7A2B\"> +++$+++ :::Thanks for the comments, good advice as usual. I've tweaked the article as necessary, and you're right, Wikipedia is just electrons and magnetic storage. --<font color="2B7A2B">[[User:Cactus.man|Cactus<b>.</b>man]]</font> <font size="4">[[User talk:Cactus.man|&#9997;]]</font> 10:26, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

265510 +++$+++ Ekajati +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-24 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.161752460E09 +++$+++ Why the heck are you wasting your time trying to twist other people's arms rather the just continuing on working on the articles you've been working on is simply a mystery to me. Seems you enjoy telling other people what to do. Well, stop. It's not appreciated by anyone. I'd say what I think about you, but it would violate [[WP:CIVIL]]. Please go do something more productive, and quit with the socks already.  +++$+++ Why the heck are you wasting your time trying to twist other people's arms rather the just continuing on working on the articles you've been working on is simply a mystery to me. Seems you enjoy telling other people what to do. Well, stop. It's not appreciated by anyone. I'd say what I think about you, but it would violate [[WP:CIVIL]]. Please go do something more productive, and quit with the socks already. [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] ([[User talk:Ekajati|yakity-yak]]) 22:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
265511 +++$+++ TomTheHand +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265510 +++$+++ 265510 +++$+++ 2006-10-24 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.161756780E09 +++$+++ Ekajati, you need to take a step back and stop taking Mattisse's tagging as an attack on the article.  It is meant as a way of bringing the problem (lack of citations) to the attention of the article's contributors.  According to [[WP:V]] the burden of proof is on the article's contributors to provide sources.  Mattisse didn't write the article; how can you expect her to know where the information in it came from?  +++$+++ :Ekajati, you need to take a step back and stop taking Mattisse's tagging as an attack on the article.  It is meant as a way of bringing the problem (lack of citations) to the attention of the article's contributors.  According to [[WP:V]] the burden of proof is on the article's contributors to provide sources.  Mattisse didn't write the article; how can you expect her to know where the information in it came from? [[User:TomTheHand|TomTheHand]] 23:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
265512 +++$+++ William M. Connolley +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265510 +++$+++ 265511 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.161820140E09 +++$+++ If this is indeed M's motivation, then she should proceed differently, and put a note on the talk page and discuss it there. People tend to view the tags as more of an attack when placed on the article itself  +++$+++ :: If this is indeed M's motivation, then she should proceed differently, and put a note on the talk page and discuss it there. People tend to view the tags as more of an attack when placed on the article itself [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 16:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
265513 +++$+++ TomTheHand +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265510 +++$+++ 265512 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.161825660E09 +++$+++ I feel placing tags on the article itself draws extra attention to the fact that the article doesn't cite properly.  Yes, it's ugly, and it's saying something negative about the article.  The proper reaction to that is to fix the article so that there's no reason to tag it.  +++$+++ :::I feel placing tags on the article itself draws extra attention to the fact that the article doesn't cite properly.  Yes, it's ugly, and it's saying something negative about the article.  The proper reaction to that is to fix the article so that there's no reason to tag it. [[User:TomTheHand|TomTheHand]] 18:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
265514 +++$+++ Maury Markowitz +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265510 +++$+++ 265513 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.161840420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::[[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury]] 22:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
265515 +++$+++ TomTheHand +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265510 +++$+++ 265514 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.161846660E09 +++$+++ I don't think so.  Yes, there are some cases where WP:V can be satisfied without inline references. This is not one of those cases.  +++$+++ :::::I don't think so.  Yes, there are some cases where WP:V can be satisfied without inline references. This is not one of those cases. [[User:TomTheHand|TomTheHand]] 00:11, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
265516 +++$+++ Maury Markowitz +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265510 +++$+++ 265510 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.161891300E09 +++$+++ Well perhaps I should have kept my post to the real argument alone. The issue here isn't about right and wrong, it's about civility. If this behaviour leads to edit wars and blocks (and it's not just here, it's all over the wiki), is it worth it? I personally think edit wars are worse for the wiki than poor style.  +++$+++ :Well perhaps I should have kept my post to the real argument alone. The issue here isn't about right and wrong, it's about civility. If this behaviour leads to edit wars and blocks (and it's not just here, it's all over the wiki), is it worth it? I personally think edit wars are worse for the wiki than poor style. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury]] 12:35, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

524849 +++$+++ Prisonnet +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-28 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.154083200E09 +++$+++ I thought we were agreed that no more changes would be made until a decision was reached -- +++$+++ I thought we were agreed that no more changes would be made until a decision was reached --[[User:Prisonnet|Prisonnet]] 03:40, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
524850 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524849 +++$+++ 524849 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.154084580E09 +++$+++ I disagree with your implication, but please clarify your claim in more detail on the mediation page, and I will be happy to address it there. -- +++$+++ :I disagree with your implication, but please clarify your claim in more detail on the mediation page, and I will be happy to address it there. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 04:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

3368 +++$+++ Northlimitation +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-05 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.281057900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Northlimitation|Northlimitation]] ([[User talk:Northlimitation#top|talk]]) 18:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
3369 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3368 +++$+++ 3368 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.282719960E09 +++$+++ Gee, thanks mate :) Too tired to say anything else that's sensible just now though, been at conference all day!  +++$+++ :Gee, thanks mate :) Too tired to say anything else that's sensible just now though, been at conference all day! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 00:06, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

3371 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-28 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.283037480E09 +++$+++ An anon IP has added \"Mh\xf3r-Roinn\" to the infobox of [[Mainland, Shetland]]. Would I be wrong in thinking that is is a literal translation of \"mainland\" rather than a Gaelic name for the island?  +++$+++ An anon IP has added "Mhór-Roinn" to the infobox of [[Mainland, Shetland]]. Would I be wrong in thinking that is is a literal translation of "mainland" rather than a Gaelic name for the island? [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 16:18, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
3372 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3371 +++$+++ 3371 +++$+++ 2010-08-28 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.283042220E09 +++$+++ Not only that, it's also bad Gaelic. I'm almost 100% convinced this is made up and not historic. I think the only time I've heard the Shetland mainland spoken about in Gaelic was on BBC Alba as ''T\xecr-m\xf2r Shealtainn'' but again that's not historic as such and just a literal translation of Shetland Mainland. I think until we can establish at least modern usage via BBC Alba, we should go without a Gaelic name.  +++$+++ :Not only that, it's also bad Gaelic. I'm almost 100% convinced this is made up and not historic. I think the only time I've heard the Shetland mainland spoken about in Gaelic was on BBC Alba as ''Tìr-mòr Shealtainn'' but again that's not historic as such and just a literal translation of Shetland Mainland. I think until we can establish at least modern usage via BBC Alba, we should go without a Gaelic name. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 17:37, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
3373 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3371 +++$+++ 3372 +++$+++ 2010-08-28 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.283045400E09 +++$+++ Done. Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::Done. Thanks again. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 18:30, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

3374 +++$+++ Finnrind +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-31 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.283293440E09 +++$+++ Any idea on how to address this? I'm getting rather fed up with those drive by mapchangers (can't imagine how bored you must be...). It's really those that would like to see a new map in the article that should take some initiative for new discussions on the talk page, but they don't really seem to be the constructive sort of editors. Best regards,  +++$+++ Any idea on how to address this? I'm getting rather fed up with those drive by mapchangers (can't imagine how bored you must be...). It's really those that would like to see a new map in the article that should take some initiative for new discussions on the talk page, but they don't really seem to be the constructive sort of editors. Best regards, [[User:Finnrind|Finn Rindahl]] ([[User talk:Finnrind|talk]]) 15:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
3375 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3374 +++$+++ 3374 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.283299380E09 +++$+++ The only partial solution I can think of is to get a sympathetic admin to put a partial protect that blocks IP edits on those pages (BC, Gip, \xc1l, Bis). That would leave us with Satesclop to deal with but he looks to be heading for a block anyway. What do you think?  +++$+++ :The only partial solution I can think of is to get a sympathetic admin to put a partial protect that blocks IP edits on those pages (BC, Gip, Ál, Bis). That would leave us with Satesclop to deal with but he looks to be heading for a block anyway. What do you think? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 17:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
3376 +++$+++ Finnrind +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3374 +++$+++ 3375 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.283304480E09 +++$+++ Well, your probably right about where [[Special:Contributions\/Satesclop]] is heading... I think a semi-protection would be in order for this article (and probably the other three you listed, but I haven't been watching those) - I'm a bit reluctant to try and get one though as getting administrative actions done here at enwiki normally require a lot of red tape :P If it goes on I might try anyway - reverting once a day from various ip-adresses is not a blocking offense per policy (and which ip should be blocked anyway), but it is certainly an disturbance.  +++$+++ ::Well, your probably right about where [[Special:Contributions/Satesclop]] is heading... I think a semi-protection would be in order for this article (and probably the other three you listed, but I haven't been watching those) - I'm a bit reluctant to try and get one though as getting administrative actions done here at enwiki normally require a lot of red tape :P If it goes on I might try anyway - reverting once a day from various ip-adresses is not a blocking offense per policy (and which ip should be blocked anyway), but it is certainly an disturbance. [[User:Finnrind|Finn Rindahl]] ([[User talk:Finnrind|talk]]) 18:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
3377 +++$+++ Finnrind +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3374 +++$+++ 3375 +++$+++ 2010-09-03 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.283557140E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Lar&diff=382700562&oldid=382140592] FYI  +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lar&diff=382700562&oldid=382140592] FYI [[User:Finnrind|Finn Rindahl]] ([[User talk:Finnrind|talk]]) 16:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
3378 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3374 +++$+++ 3377 +++$+++ 2010-09-03 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.283559720E09 +++$+++ Ah, your cry for help worked quicker than mine; thanks mate!  +++$+++ :::Ah, your cry for help worked quicker than mine; thanks mate! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 17:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
3379 +++$+++ Deibid +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3374 +++$+++ 3378 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.284483540E09 +++$+++ I was out of business, in wikivacation, for the last month... but I cried in relief when I saw this one... at last! thank you guys! I whish the same could be done with all the other horrible red maps, but I'll leave these alone for the time being.  +++$+++ :::: I was out of business, in wikivacation, for the last month... but I cried in relief when I saw this one... at last! thank you guys! I whish the same could be done with all the other horrible red maps, but I'll leave these alone for the time being. [[User:Deibid|David]] ([[User talk:Deibid|talk]]) 09:59, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
3380 +++$+++ Finnrind +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3374 +++$+++ 3379 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.288070460E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Favonian&curid=21612334&diff=392874058&oldid=392792167 FYI] (Why do I get this feeling of deja vu...?)  +++$+++ :::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Favonian&curid=21612334&diff=392874058&oldid=392792167 FYI] (Why do I get this feeling of deja vu...?) [[User:Finnrind|Finn Rindahl]] ([[User talk:Finnrind|talk]]) 22:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
3381 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3374 +++$+++ 3380 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.288070640E09 +++$+++ Oh for the love of dixie...  +++$+++ ::::::Oh for the love of dixie... [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 22:24, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
3382 +++$+++ Finnrind +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3374 +++$+++ 3381 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.288071360E09 +++$+++ Now that's an expression I'm not familiar with, and when I tried googling I came up with [[To Love and Die in Dixie|this]]. Hm...  +++$+++ :::::::Now that's an expression I'm not familiar with, and when I tried googling I came up with [[To Love and Die in Dixie|this]]. Hm... [[User:Finnrind|Finn Rindahl]] ([[User talk:Finnrind|talk]]) 22:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

527663 +++$+++ Neutralhomer +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527663 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-18 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.179477600E09 +++$+++ I like the idea of incorporating the user contribs into the userbox.  That makes it easier so you don't have to go through and count it once and awhile and find the userboxes again, get an updated one, it is automatic now.  Nicely done!  Take Care.... +++$+++ I like the idea of incorporating the user contribs into the userbox.  That makes it easier so you don't have to go through and count it once and awhile and find the userboxes again, get an updated one, it is automatic now.  Nicely done!  Take Care....[[User:Neutralhomer|<font color="#000099">NeutralHomer</font>]] <span style="font-size: 0.8em;"><sup>[[User Talk:Neutralhomer|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Neutralhomer|C]]</sup></span> 01:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
527664 +++$+++ Neutralhomer +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527663 +++$+++ 527663 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.179477840E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see.....well, a \"nicely done\" for you and for everyone involved.  It is a really cool idea:)  Take Care... +++$+++ :Ah, I see.....well, a "nicely done" for you and for everyone involved.  It is a really cool idea:)  Take Care...[[User:Neutralhomer|<font color="#000099">NeutralHomer</font>]] <span style="font-size: 0.8em;"><sup>[[User Talk:Neutralhomer|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Neutralhomer|C]]</sup></span> 01:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

527669 +++$+++ Radiant! +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.179759840E09 +++$+++ Hello! I'm afraid I disagree with your closure of [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion\/List of people by name]]. Apart from the sheer majority of delete comments, most keep comments are not particularly well-founded. \"It has been kept before\" is not grounds for a procedural keep; \"it can be maintained\" and \"it works better than the search function\" are proven wrong by precedent; \"no reason for deletion\" is simple falsehood; and \"it helps people find things if they don't know how to spell them\" simply isn't true either. We can use bots to populate categories if need be; if many people comment on such an issue I think we can do better than \"not everybody agrees so let's do nothing\". Yours,  +++$+++ Hello! I'm afraid I disagree with your closure of [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/List of people by name]]. Apart from the sheer majority of delete comments, most keep comments are not particularly well-founded. "It has been kept before" is not grounds for a procedural keep; "it can be maintained" and "it works better than the search function" are proven wrong by precedent; "no reason for deletion" is simple falsehood; and "it helps people find things if they don't know how to spell them" simply isn't true either. We can use bots to populate categories if need be; if many people comment on such an issue I think we can do better than "not everybody agrees so let's do nothing". Yours, [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#0000DD">&gt;<font color="#0066FF">R<font color="#0099FF">a<font color="#00CCFF">d<font color="#00EEFF">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 08:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
527670 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527669 +++$+++ 527669 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.179769680E09 +++$+++ Ah. I asked Radiant (on his talk page) to comment on my proposals for actually ''doing something'' about LoPbN, but there was no response. I see that he correctly points out the poor keep reasons, but doesn't mention what I said (and no, \"it can be maintained\" is not an accurate portrayal of what I was saying, but then I don't really know what Radiant's opinion is on what I said because, from my perspective it looks like he has nothing to say about my contributions to that debate). Sorry to rant like this on your (^demon's) talk page, but it is intensely frustrating when I spend time coming up with ways to move forward on these issues, proposing new things that weren't brought up in the previous debates, and going so far as to set out a bullet-pointed plan for what could be done, and then see people showing lack of imagination and saying (effectively) \"give up, it is too difficult to reform, just delete the lot\", or \"give up, it is too difficult to reform but still worth keeping\". I'm saying \"let's actually reform this, here is a plan\". I realise an MfD debate is not the best place for this, but I would like to start a discussion somewhere on how to move this forward, but ''not'' on the LoPbN talk page, as that may get deleted one day and I don't intend to write loads and then see it deleted (another reason why I started the debate on the MfD page). I'd also be happier if everyone could work together on the proposal I've put forward, but I fear Jerzy (who has also been rather unresponsive, though at least he said he was short of time) and Radiant and others in that debate, will remain entrenched in their positions. Is there any way to persuade people to work together on something like this? Or is it too much to expect people to invest time and effort to reform something, when it is much easier to vote keep or delete? <sigh>  +++$+++ :Ah. I asked Radiant (on his talk page) to comment on my proposals for actually ''doing something'' about LoPbN, but there was no response. I see that he correctly points out the poor keep reasons, but doesn't mention what I said (and no, "it can be maintained" is not an accurate portrayal of what I was saying, but then I don't really know what Radiant's opinion is on what I said because, from my perspective it looks like he has nothing to say about my contributions to that debate). Sorry to rant like this on your (^demon's) talk page, but it is intensely frustrating when I spend time coming up with ways to move forward on these issues, proposing new things that weren't brought up in the previous debates, and going so far as to set out a bullet-pointed plan for what could be done, and then see people showing lack of imagination and saying (effectively) "give up, it is too difficult to reform, just delete the lot", or "give up, it is too difficult to reform but still worth keeping". I'm saying "let's actually reform this, here is a plan". I realise an MfD debate is not the best place for this, but I would like to start a discussion somewhere on how to move this forward, but ''not'' on the LoPbN talk page, as that may get deleted one day and I don't intend to write loads and then see it deleted (another reason why I started the debate on the MfD page). I'd also be happier if everyone could work together on the proposal I've put forward, but I fear Jerzy (who has also been rather unresponsive, though at least he said he was short of time) and Radiant and others in that debate, will remain entrenched in their positions. Is there any way to persuade people to work together on something like this? Or is it too much to expect people to invest time and effort to reform something, when it is much easier to vote keep or delete? <sigh> [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 10:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
527671 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527669 +++$+++ 527670 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.179769860E09 +++$+++ And maybe some discussion will now restart at [[Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion\/List of people by name]], where I've replied to a comment Radiant made. So the above might become moot if productive discussion restarts at the MfD talk page.  +++$+++ ::And maybe some discussion will now restart at [[Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/List of people by name]], where I've replied to a comment Radiant made. So the above might become moot if productive discussion restarts at the MfD talk page. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 10:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
527672 +++$+++ Radiant! +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527669 +++$+++ 527669 +++$+++ 2007-05-23 09:56:00 +++$+++ 1.179939360E09 +++$+++ Since you didn't respond here, I've listed it on deletion review.  +++$+++ *Since you didn't respond here, I've listed it on deletion review. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#0000DD">&gt;<font color="#0066FF">R<font color="#0099FF">a<font color="#00CCFF">d<font color="#00EEFF">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 09:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

265527 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-29 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.162114260E09 +++$+++ It is very, very interesting. (Is that where I got the link to India - Constitution?) I would like to comment more on your issues as I have many feeling about what you are saying. You express  yourself very well. You are a good writer.   +++$+++ It is very, very interesting. (Is that where I got the link to India - Constitution?) I would like to comment more on your issues as I have many feeling about what you are saying. You express  yourself very well. You are a good writer.  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 01:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
265528 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265527 +++$+++ 265527 +++$+++ 2006-10-29 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.162115880E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the complement on my writing.  When I am passionate, I seem to be able to write, but when I write about dams and such, I seem to fumble :-(.  Which item on my user page do you have many feelings about?  It is funny, because I wrote the industrial sabotage piece based on what seemed to be personal observation, and then a month or so later there was a scandal because staff from the US Capitol were discovered to be manipulating biographies of politicians.  Not surprising of course.  The other big item on my user page, of course, is my unresolved conflict with DBachmann.  What can I say about that?  I'm going offline now, talk to you again.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the complement on my writing.  When I am passionate, I seem to be able to write, but when I write about dams and such, I seem to fumble :-(.  Which item on my user page do you have many feelings about?  It is funny, because I wrote the industrial sabotage piece based on what seemed to be personal observation, and then a month or so later there was a scandal because staff from the US Capitol were discovered to be manipulating biographies of politicians.  Not surprising of course.  The other big item on my user page, of course, is my unresolved conflict with DBachmann.  What can I say about that?  I'm going offline now, talk to you again.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 01:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
265529 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265527 +++$+++ 265528 +++$+++ 2006-10-29 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.162187880E09 +++$+++ With regard to the second item, the other editor involved is not ''particularly'' anti-Indian.  I think it is more the case that he does not care if he makes statements which are derogatory, insensitive or inflamatory etc.  If you look at the most recent changes to my user page, you will see that he has made remarks which negatively relate to (non-Indian) Muslims as well.  In most respects, however, he is a very good editor, insists on scholarly references, is very knowledgable etc.  However, as a respected editor and administrator, he sets an example to others.  In some cases, discussion regarding the content of articles is extremely difficult due to a high volume of racial, ethnic, religious etc. remarks that are made, as if certain people from certain groups are thought to be incapable of rational thought, following policies etc.  But like the previous issue above, I don't really know the solution.  Sometimes it saddens me.  -- +++$+++ ::With regard to the second item, the other editor involved is not ''particularly'' anti-Indian.  I think it is more the case that he does not care if he makes statements which are derogatory, insensitive or inflamatory etc.  If you look at the most recent changes to my user page, you will see that he has made remarks which negatively relate to (non-Indian) Muslims as well.  In most respects, however, he is a very good editor, insists on scholarly references, is very knowledgable etc.  However, as a respected editor and administrator, he sets an example to others.  In some cases, discussion regarding the content of articles is extremely difficult due to a high volume of racial, ethnic, religious etc. remarks that are made, as if certain people from certain groups are thought to be incapable of rational thought, following policies etc.  But like the previous issue above, I don't really know the solution.  Sometimes it saddens me.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 21:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
265530 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265527 +++$+++ 265529 +++$+++ 2006-10-30 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.162203600E09 +++$+++ With regard to [[Kaveri]], the conflict over that page was not religious, but was  somewhat political and perhaps somewhat related to ethnic\/linguistic conflicts.  However, you did not start or even aggrevate the conflict on that page.  Rather, the conflict on that page existed before you added the pic, and actually abated after you added the pic.  The picture illustrates that during part of the year, some of the riverbeds are dry.  That is a fact that is well known.  You did nothing wrong, not even unintentionally.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::With regard to [[Kaveri]], the conflict over that page was not religious, but was  somewhat political and perhaps somewhat related to ethnic/linguistic conflicts.  However, you did not start or even aggrevate the conflict on that page.  Rather, the conflict on that page existed before you added the pic, and actually abated after you added the pic.  The picture illustrates that during part of the year, some of the riverbeds are dry.  That is a fact that is well known.  You did nothing wrong, not even unintentionally.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 02:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
265531 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265527 +++$+++ 265530 +++$+++ 2006-10-30 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.162249380E09 +++$+++ Your [[Muppandal]] contribution looks nice. -- +++$+++ ::::Your [[Muppandal]] contribution looks nice. --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 15:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
265532 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265527 +++$+++ 265531 +++$+++ 2006-10-31 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.162286220E09 +++$+++ Yes, I remember Salman Rushdie.  He was actually in the news not too long ago...  The word jihad may not arouse any strong feelings in you.  However, I believe that for many  people in the West, it evokes thoughts of the NYC world trade center, or similar scenes.  Someone who has been labeled as engaging in jihad, in effect loses all credibility and becomes an object of contempt for some people.  Certainly not for all people, but for some.  Whether an editor is generally \"loose\" in his\/her comments may shed some light on the ''intent'' of a comment.  However, I think the ''effect'' is negative, regardless of intent.  What a heavy conversation this is!  -- +++$+++ :::::Yes, I remember Salman Rushdie.  He was actually in the news not too long ago...  The word jihad may not arouse any strong feelings in you.  However, I believe that for many  people in the West, it evokes thoughts of the NYC world trade center, or similar scenes.  Someone who has been labeled as engaging in jihad, in effect loses all credibility and becomes an object of contempt for some people.  Certainly not for all people, but for some.  Whether an editor is generally "loose" in his/her comments may shed some light on the ''intent'' of a comment.  However, I think the ''effect'' is negative, regardless of intent.  What a heavy conversation this is!  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 01:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

3384 +++$+++ Nergaal +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3384 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-02 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.283484720E09 +++$+++ Replied.  +++$+++ Replied. [[User:Nergaal|Nergaal]] ([[User talk:Nergaal|talk]]) 20:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
3385 +++$+++ Nergaal +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3384 +++$+++ 3384 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.285018920E09 +++$+++ No, I have decreased the confusion. This way, even if it might be suggested that they are Romani languages, at least it is cleat that they are not the languages spoken by either [[Vlachs]], [[Aromanians]], [[Morlachs]], [[Megleno-Romanians]], [[Istro-Romanians]], and neither by [[Romanians of Serbia]], or by other members of [[Romanian diaspora]]. What's next, ''Romano-Romanian''??  +++$+++ :No, I have decreased the confusion. This way, even if it might be suggested that they are Romani languages, at least it is cleat that they are not the languages spoken by either [[Vlachs]], [[Aromanians]], [[Morlachs]], [[Megleno-Romanians]], [[Istro-Romanians]], and neither by [[Romanians of Serbia]], or by other members of [[Romanian diaspora]]. What's next, ''Romano-Romanian''?? [[User:Nergaal|Nergaal]] ([[User talk:Nergaal|talk]]) 14:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
3386 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3384 +++$+++ 3385 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.285021020E09 +++$+++ To an extent, what you feel is confusing is irrelevant, you can't just make up a name because you feel it's clearer.  +++$+++ ::To an extent, what you feel is confusing is irrelevant, you can't just make up a name because you feel it's clearer. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 15:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

527675 +++$+++ FunPika +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.179805620E09 +++$+++ Can you undelete [[:Image:027_ERP_gantry.jpg]] and [[:Image:Image:Alfa_Romea_159_at_the_dealer.jpg]] (you deleted them)? They were deleted under G5 (contributions by banned user) (they were uploaded by [[User:VK35]]). After the deletions Jimbo Wales determined the uploader was not a sockpuppet of a banned user.  +++$+++ Can you undelete [[:Image:027_ERP_gantry.jpg]] and [[:Image:Image:Alfa_Romea_159_at_the_dealer.jpg]] (you deleted them)? They were deleted under G5 (contributions by banned user) (they were uploaded by [[User:VK35]]). After the deletions Jimbo Wales determined the uploader was not a sockpuppet of a banned user. [[User:Funpika|<span style="color:blue"><b>Fun</b></span>]][[User_Talk:Funpika|<span style="color:green"><b>pika</b></span>]] 20:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
527676 +++$+++ FunPika +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527675 +++$+++ 527675 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.179817080E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/delete&page=Image:Alfa_Romea_159_at_the_dealer.jpg Deletion log of second image]. I think my typo was that I accidently put Image: twice.  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Image:Alfa_Romea_159_at_the_dealer.jpg Deletion log of second image]. I think my typo was that I accidently put Image: twice. [[User:Funpika|<span style="color:blue"><b>Fun</b></span>]][[User_Talk:Funpika|<span style="color:green"><b>pika</b></span>]] 23:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

3389 +++$+++ 81.135.41.3 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-02 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.286045940E09 +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions\/81.135.41.3|81.135.41.3]] ( +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions/81.135.41.3|81.135.41.3]] ([[User talk:81.135.41.3|talk]]) 11:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
3390 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3389 +++$+++ 3389 +++$+++ 2010-10-02 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.286046420E09 +++$+++ It's a word that was borrowed from English )if that etymology is correct) to Irish and then back into English. Which makes it a re-borrowing but close enough to be pertinent to the subject. Kindly stop splitting hairs, this is not a court of law.  +++$+++ :It's a word that was borrowed from English )if that etymology is correct) to Irish and then back into English. Which makes it a re-borrowing but close enough to be pertinent to the subject. Kindly stop splitting hairs, this is not a court of law. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 12:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
3391 +++$+++ 81.135.41.3 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3389 +++$+++ 3390 +++$+++ 2010-10-07 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.286506860E09 +++$+++ The word is a Gaelic word. It is a Gaelic word of Gaelic origin. --[[Special:Contributions\/81.135.41.3|81.135.41.3]] ( +++$+++ :: The word is a Gaelic word. It is a Gaelic word of Gaelic origin. --[[Special:Contributions/81.135.41.3|81.135.41.3]] ([[User talk:81.135.41.3|talk]]) 20:01, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
3392 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3389 +++$+++ 3391 +++$+++ 2010-10-07 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.286508660E09 +++$+++ It's a [[reborrowing]] for heaven's sake. Which means that while it ultimately has its roots in language 1, went to language 2 and then back to L1, most people would still '''think''' of it as a word from L2 because these things don't happen within a week. [[Boulevard]] was borrowed from Dutch into French and then back to Dutch. Ask anyone one the street and they'll think of boulevard as French. That doesn't mean it's actually French but in a study on French loanwords, it's a pertinent point to make if only to point out it's a reborrowing and not originally French. We're trying to '''give information''' on topics people might be interested in and this fact is pertinent to questions about Irish loanwords. End of.  +++$+++ :::It's a [[reborrowing]] for heaven's sake. Which means that while it ultimately has its roots in language 1, went to language 2 and then back to L1, most people would still '''think''' of it as a word from L2 because these things don't happen within a week. [[Boulevard]] was borrowed from Dutch into French and then back to Dutch. Ask anyone one the street and they'll think of boulevard as French. That doesn't mean it's actually French but in a study on French loanwords, it's a pertinent point to make if only to point out it's a reborrowing and not originally French. We're trying to '''give information''' on topics people might be interested in and this fact is pertinent to questions about Irish loanwords. End of. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 20:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

265534 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-01 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.162376760E09 +++$+++ It looked like a spelling mistake so I fixed it.  I suppose complicated things are going on, but I hope not too complicated.  There is always drama on Wikipedia.  -- +++$+++ It looked like a spelling mistake so I fixed it.  I suppose complicated things are going on, but I hope not too complicated.  There is always drama on Wikipedia.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 02:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
265535 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265534 +++$+++ 265534 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.162378200E09 +++$+++ There is definitely a fair amount of deception.  But there are also some very good people as well.  -- +++$+++ :There is definitely a fair amount of deception.  But there are also some very good people as well.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 02:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
265536 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265534 +++$+++ 265535 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.162379400E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the compliment.  I have to go now, which is probably a good thing, since otherwise I would leave you hanging while I'm trying to choose my words.  Take care. -- +++$+++ ::Thank you for the compliment.  I have to go now, which is probably a good thing, since otherwise I would leave you hanging while I'm trying to choose my words.  Take care. --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 03:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

3393 +++$+++ RashersTierney +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-05 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.286343900E09 +++$+++ Hope the absence is short and a break at [http:\/\/ga.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pr%C3%ADomhleathanach Vicip\xe9id] will recharge your batteries. Best.  +++$+++ Hope the absence is short and a break at [http://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pr%C3%ADomhleathanach Vicipéid] will recharge your batteries. Best. [[User:RashersTierney|RashersTierney]] ([[User talk:RashersTierney|talk]]) 22:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
3394 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3393 +++$+++ 3393 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.286344200E09 +++$+++ Thanks mate, we'll see about how long I need before I'll feel up to it again. It's this one by the way [http:\/\/gd.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pr%C3%AComh-Dhuilleag]. I'll keep the Roma(ni) pages on my watchlist!  +++$+++ :Thanks mate, we'll see about how long I need before I'll feel up to it again. It's this one by the way [http://gd.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pr%C3%AComh-Dhuilleag]. I'll keep the Roma(ni) pages on my watchlist! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 22:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
3395 +++$+++ Finnrind +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3393 +++$+++ 3394 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.286345100E09 +++$+++ Hm, is that \"Bhicip\xe8idia\" or \"Wikipedia\" in Scottish Gaelic? (There's a link on the frontpage over there that goes over a redir, you may want to unpipe that :) Anyway, keep up the good work whichever project your active at, hope to see you around here again soon. Best regards,  +++$+++ ::Hm, is that "Bhicipèidia" or "Wikipedia" in Scottish Gaelic? (There's a link on the frontpage over there that goes over a redir, you may want to unpipe that :) Anyway, keep up the good work whichever project your active at, hope to see you around here again soon. Best regards, [[User:Finnrind|Finn Rindahl]] ([[User talk:Finnrind|talk]]) 23:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
3396 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3393 +++$+++ 3395 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 08:50:00 +++$+++ 1.286380200E09 +++$+++ Have a great break and haste ye back.  +++$+++ :::Have a great break and haste ye back. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 08:50, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
3397 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3393 +++$+++ 3396 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.286380320E09 +++$+++ We're better of here because of you. \u2014  +++$+++ ::::We're better of here because of you. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 08:52, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
3398 +++$+++ Xabier_Armendaritz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3393 +++$+++ 3397 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.286382000E09 +++$+++ Hope you come back soon! Basque-related articles will miss very much your sound editions. -- +++$+++ :::::Hope you come back soon! Basque-related articles will miss very much your sound editions. --[[User:Xabier_Armendaritz|Xabier Armendaritz]]<sup>[[User talk:Xabier_Armendaritz|<span style="color:#0000FF;">(talk)</span>]]</sup> 09:20, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

462752 +++$+++ SweetNightmares +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ 462752 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-22 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.308801780E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your input. It sounds like the most logical way to go. I like what you've done with the borough's article! I have one question though: do you still consider the park article to be a stub? -- +++$+++ Thank you for your input. It sounds like the most logical way to go. I like what you've done with the borough's article! I have one question though: do you still consider the park article to be a stub? --[[User:SweetNightmares|<b><font color="deeppink">Sweet</font><font color="black">Nightmares</font></b>]] [[User talk:SweetNightmares|<font color="goldenrod"><small>(awaken)</small></font>]] 21:03, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
462753 +++$+++ SweetNightmares +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ 462752 +++$+++ 462752 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.308803460E09 +++$+++ That's true; I've noticed that unfortunately the French Wikipedia tends to be a lot less developed than the English one. Thanks again for your work! -- +++$+++ :That's true; I've noticed that unfortunately the French Wikipedia tends to be a lot less developed than the English one. Thanks again for your work! --[[User:SweetNightmares|<b><font color="deeppink">Sweet</font><font color="black">Nightmares</font></b>]] [[User talk:SweetNightmares|<font color="goldenrod"><small>(awaken)</small></font>]] 21:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

527684 +++$+++ KnowBoundaries +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-22 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.179895560E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you removed the picture (Cheetah_MTI_Brochure.jpg) I placed in the Lamborghini Cheetah article. The reason given was: \"Per CSD I5 - image is unfree and is unused\". The picture came from a brochure that I own, that would make it FREE (and public domain I presume), and was used in the article there by making it USED. Can you explain why you removed it? +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you removed the picture (Cheetah_MTI_Brochure.jpg) I placed in the Lamborghini Cheetah article. The reason given was: "Per CSD I5 - image is unfree and is unused". The picture came from a brochure that I own, that would make it FREE (and public domain I presume), and was used in the article there by making it USED. Can you explain why you removed it?[[User:KnowBoundaries|KnowBoundaries]] 21:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
527685 +++$+++ Psychonaut +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527684 +++$+++ 527684 +++$+++ 2007-05-22 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.179896700E09 +++$+++ Just because you own a brochure doesn't mean you hold the copyright to its contents, or that they are in the public domain.  Did you write the text and produce the photographs or artwork on the brochure?  If so, then you hold the copyright, and can specify a license of your choice. \u2014 +++$+++ :Just because you own a brochure doesn't mean you hold the copyright to its contents, or that they are in the public domain.  Did you write the text and produce the photographs or artwork on the brochure?  If so, then you hold the copyright, and can specify a license of your choice. —[[User:Psychonaut|Psychonaut]] 22:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
527686 +++$+++ KnowBoundaries +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527684 +++$+++ 527684 +++$+++ 2007-05-23 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.179948540E09 +++$+++ BTW the company that created the image has been defunct for some time and I recieved the brochure recently from its former CEO. --  +++$+++ :BTW the company that created the image has been defunct for some time and I recieved the brochure recently from its former CEO. -- [[User:KnowBoundaries|KnowBoundaries]] 12:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

3400 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-06 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.286390160E09 +++$+++ Kaixo Akerbeltz, zelan? Sorry but as far as I see there's no update, so I don't know exactly what your note is about, but seems to me you are referring to a late edit of mine? I went through the archive and didn't find anything new. I guess you mean the agreed main term Basque Country is for the autonomous c. and Basque Country (gr) for the other, right? (Still didn't find it, sorry but I'm always a bit in hurry) Hope you're still around, I received one of these abusive notes from Guipuscoa myself, I am watchful. Regards  +++$+++ Kaixo Akerbeltz, zelan? Sorry but as far as I see there's no update, so I don't know exactly what your note is about, but seems to me you are referring to a late edit of mine? I went through the archive and didn't find anything new. I guess you mean the agreed main term Basque Country is for the autonomous c. and Basque Country (gr) for the other, right? (Still didn't find it, sorry but I'm always a bit in hurry) Hope you're still around, I received one of these abusive notes from Guipuscoa myself, I am watchful. Regards [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 11:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
3401 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3400 +++$+++ 3400 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.286390640E09 +++$+++ Ondo, ta zu? Ok, I'm with you now - yes, I was referring to the old debate which ended up with ''Basque Country (greater region)'' for the 7 provinces together.  +++$+++ :Ondo, ta zu? Ok, I'm with you now - yes, I was referring to the old debate which ended up with ''Basque Country (greater region)'' for the 7 provinces together. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:44, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

3402 +++$+++ Xabier_Armendaritz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-06 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.286401860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up! Let's see if that works and we are freed from spending so much time with this disgusting vandalism. -- +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up! Let's see if that works and we are freed from spending so much time with this disgusting vandalism. --[[User:Xabier_Armendaritz|Xabier Armendaritz]]<sup>[[User talk:Xabier_Armendaritz|<span style="color:#0000FF;">(talk)</span>]]</sup> 14:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
3403 +++$+++ Xabier_Armendaritz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3402 +++$+++ 3402 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.286403600E09 +++$+++ On the other hand, this makes me think that perhaps this vandal also used his home connection. The anonymous IP was a connection from a company located in Biscay, Babcock&Wilcox, so perhaps he\/she made some other edits from home... just a thought. -- +++$+++ :On the other hand, this makes me think that perhaps this vandal also used his home connection. The anonymous IP was a connection from a company located in Biscay, Babcock&Wilcox, so perhaps he/she made some other edits from home... just a thought. --[[User:Xabier_Armendaritz|Xabier Armendaritz]]<sup>[[User talk:Xabier_Armendaritz|<span style="color:#0000FF;">(talk)</span>]]</sup> 15:20, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
3404 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3402 +++$+++ 3403 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.286403780E09 +++$+++ I have to go out too. I've checked all edits down to Sefarroa in the list, so you could move onto Jamesdard and then down? Yes, I have no illusions about him\/her being gone for good but it's a start. Let's keep an eye on the pages they crusaded on and if we spot another pattern, we'll deal with it. <sigh> so much hatred.  +++$+++ ::I have to go out too. I've checked all edits down to Sefarroa in the list, so you could move onto Jamesdard and then down? Yes, I have no illusions about him/her being gone for good but it's a start. Let's keep an eye on the pages they crusaded on and if we spot another pattern, we'll deal with it. <sigh> so much hatred. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 15:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
3405 +++$+++ Qwrk +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3402 +++$+++ 3404 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.286407080E09 +++$+++ Two thumbs up!  And thanks for the cooperation.  Hope we can restart adding ''important'' and ''worthwhile'' contributions.  (Tiring, ain't it?)   +++$+++ :::Two thumbs up!  And thanks for the cooperation.  Hope we can restart adding ''important'' and ''worthwhile'' contributions.  (Tiring, ain't it?)  [[User:Qwrk|Qwrk]] ([[User talk:Qwrk|talk]]) 16:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
3406 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3402 +++$+++ 3405 +++$+++ 2010-10-07 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.286508900E09 +++$+++ Thank you too, and yes... things like that are what's making me... well, at least take a Wikivacation on the Gaelic Wiki. Such a waste of everyone's time.  +++$+++ ::::Thank you too, and yes... things like that are what's making me... well, at least take a Wikivacation on the Gaelic Wiki. Such a waste of everyone's time. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 20:35, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
3407 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3402 +++$+++ 3406 +++$+++ 2010-10-15 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.287166320E09 +++$+++ Kaixo! Are you in your Wikivacation in the Highlands?:) Just to tell you, I left a note on the sockpuppets investigation about this Rolobando03 in [[Gipuzkoa]], not sure if that's the right place since it's been a while, but this Guipuscoa is still around, so there it is. Enjoy the Highlander \"summer\", and come back! (By the way, you may know by now, there is a Scotland's rural sport contest\/festival in the BC, in Hondarribia if I'm not wrong. Ondo ibili  +++$+++ ::::: Kaixo! Are you in your Wikivacation in the Highlands?:) Just to tell you, I left a note on the sockpuppets investigation about this Rolobando03 in [[Gipuzkoa]], not sure if that's the right place since it's been a while, but this Guipuscoa is still around, so there it is. Enjoy the Highlander "summer", and come back! (By the way, you may know by now, there is a Scotland's rural sport contest/festival in the BC, in Hondarribia if I'm not wrong. Ondo ibili [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 11:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

527691 +++$+++ SlamDiego +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527691 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-24 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.180009680E09 +++$+++ The RfM appears to have been restored by [[User:Daniel|Daniel]], but notices and whatnot are now fouled. \u2014 +++$+++ The RfM appears to have been restored by [[User:Daniel|Daniel]], but notices and whatnot are now fouled. —[[User:SlamDiego|SlamDiego]] 05:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
527692 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527691 +++$+++ 527691 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.180100340E09 +++$+++ I've removed the notices. ''' +++$+++ :I've removed the notices. '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 06:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

265548 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265548 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-04 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.162640580E09 +++$+++ (unindent) See [[Paul McCartney]] for a good example of an article on a musician. [[User:TomTheHand]] recommends [[2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict]] as an example of a well-cited article.  Thanks!   +++$+++ (unindent) See [[Paul McCartney]] for a good example of an article on a musician. [[User:TomTheHand]] recommends [[2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict]] as an example of a well-cited article.  Thanks!  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 03:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
265549 +++$+++ Sir Isaac Lime +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265548 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-04 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.162645140E09 +++$+++ Oh, and once you define a citation as a name, you can cite that reference again by saying <nowiki><ref name=\"whatever\" \/><\/nowiki>  Saves copying and pasting the whole book citation many times, and makes it easier for others to edit the article. +++$+++ ::Oh, and once you define a citation as a name, you can cite that reference again by saying <nowiki><ref name="whatever" /></nowiki>  Saves copying and pasting the whole book citation many times, and makes it easier for others to edit the article.[[User:Sir Isaac Lime|Sir Isaac Lime]] 04:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
265550 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265548 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-04 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.162674480E09 +++$+++ Thank you Sir Isaac for your reply. My point was that the information in the introduction was somewhat incorrect, so I changed it and gave a reference to try to deflect the criticism I suspected was heading my way from people who \"own\" the article. If you look in the edit history and the actual code, I think you will find that I did use named references. As I look through the article I saw more that was incorrect as well as important elements of the history of black recording ignored. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I want to improve an article about an important black artist, an article that seems unaware of the behind-the-scenes business issues which with black artists had to deal as well as other elements of the person, John Lee Hooker's, life. Thanks again!   +++$+++ :::::Thank you Sir Isaac for your reply. My point was that the information in the introduction was somewhat incorrect, so I changed it and gave a reference to try to deflect the criticism I suspected was heading my way from people who "own" the article. If you look in the edit history and the actual code, I think you will find that I did use named references. As I look through the article I saw more that was incorrect as well as important elements of the history of black recording ignored. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I want to improve an article about an important black artist, an article that seems unaware of the behind-the-scenes business issues which with black artists had to deal as well as other elements of the person, John Lee Hooker's, life. Thanks again!  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 13:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

527693 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527693 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-24 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.180009380E09 +++$+++ Have the scripts changed or what? They have suddenly stopped showing up since yesterday! (I am using IE7) --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ Have the scripts changed or what? They have suddenly stopped showing up since yesterday! (I am using IE7) --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 05:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
527694 +++$+++ Natalie Erin +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527693 +++$+++ 527693 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.180039920E09 +++$+++ I was actually going to ask the same question. I've been off-wiki for a couple of weeks, so my bad if I missed a conversation somewhere, but I really liked the autoreason.  +++$+++ :I was actually going to ask the same question. I've been off-wiki for a couple of weeks, so my bad if I missed a conversation somewhere, but I really liked the autoreason. [[User:Natalie Erin|Natalie]] 13:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
527695 +++$+++ Natalie Erin +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527693 +++$+++ 527694 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.180042500E09 +++$+++ Hurray, it works again! And just in time for a ridiculous backlog at CSD... Thanks a mil!  +++$+++ ::Hurray, it works again! And just in time for a ridiculous backlog at CSD... Thanks a mil! [[User:Natalie Erin|Natalie]] 14:35, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
527696 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527693 +++$+++ 527695 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.180052280E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Its working like a charm. Great tool you have cooked up. Cheers. :) --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ :::Thanks. Its working like a charm. Great tool you have cooked up. Cheers. :) --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 17:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

265551 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265551 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-05 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.162724400E09 +++$+++ Shall I maintain the Chennakesava Temple page as such and expand on that or shall we merge it with Belur page and then elaborate on all shrines in the complex, emphasising on Chennakesava as its the center piece, along with the Gopura, Temple tank etc. The same issue with Hoysalesvara Temple. Halebidu has many shrines including Kedareswara temple and two Jain Basadi's as well. Focussing only on Hoysalesvara gets others lost to the reader and we should probably include all shrines into Halebidu page eventually. This strategy helps us to cover multiple temples\/monuments in one page for a \"temple town\" while giving the reader a brief idea of the locality, town , trade, agriculture etc as we keep expanding. +++$+++ Shall I maintain the Chennakesava Temple page as such and expand on that or shall we merge it with Belur page and then elaborate on all shrines in the complex, emphasising on Chennakesava as its the center piece, along with the Gopura, Temple tank etc. The same issue with Hoysalesvara Temple. Halebidu has many shrines including Kedareswara temple and two Jain Basadi's as well. Focussing only on Hoysalesvara gets others lost to the reader and we should probably include all shrines into Halebidu page eventually. This strategy helps us to cover multiple temples/monuments in one page for a "temple town" while giving the reader a brief idea of the locality, town , trade, agriculture etc as we keep expanding.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
265552 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265551 +++$+++ 265551 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.162779540E09 +++$+++ Just create a page for the most important temple and let the others out (which sometimes does not cover the whole picture). Often as in Hoysala temples, the architects were smart enough to create parallel temples, with one acting as a prototype. The Kappe Channigraya temple (commissioned by Queen Shatala devi) to the right of Chennakeshava temple is actually said to be a prototype for the main Chennakeshava temple (built by King Vishnuvardhana). Also leaving out the Tank\/Gopura which was built by Vijayanagar Kings hides the continuity of patronage to the place. This is important to detail out.Your opinions are welcome +++$+++ *Just create a page for the most important temple and let the others out (which sometimes does not cover the whole picture). Often as in Hoysala temples, the architects were smart enough to create parallel temples, with one acting as a prototype. The Kappe Channigraya temple (commissioned by Queen Shatala devi) to the right of Chennakeshava temple is actually said to be a prototype for the main Chennakeshava temple (built by King Vishnuvardhana). Also leaving out the Tank/Gopura which was built by Vijayanagar Kings hides the continuity of patronage to the place. This is important to detail out.Your opinions are welcome[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

3408 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-15 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.287168360E09 +++$+++ I've given up on the Wikivacation, so many messages on and off Wikipedia :) I'll have a look at Rolando and summer, hah, zer da gauza hori? Hemen ez dugu horrelako txorakeriak ;) Didn't know about the [[Highland Games]] in Hondarribia, but I've always thought doing an exchange would be good, herri kirolak here, highland games there.  +++$+++ I've given up on the Wikivacation, so many messages on and off Wikipedia :) I'll have a look at Rolando and summer, hah, zer da gauza hori? Hemen ez dugu horrelako txorakeriak ;) Didn't know about the [[Highland Games]] in Hondarribia, but I've always thought doing an exchange would be good, herri kirolak here, highland games there. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:46, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
3409 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3408 +++$+++ 3408 +++$+++ 2010-10-15 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.287168480E09 +++$+++ Hm, so far, he's only added a flag, which one can't argue about. Let's keep an eye, it may be harmless.  +++$+++ :Hm, so far, he's only added a flag, which one can't argue about. Let's keep an eye, it may be harmless. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
3410 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3408 +++$+++ 3409 +++$+++ 2010-10-15 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.287195180E09 +++$+++ Yes, it's basically about keeping track of the new username. Oops, the exact place of the event is Ordizia, urriak 16, with a claim for self-determination as a backdrop. Scotland vs the World in Highlands Games + other events (ref. uneairitsida.net) if you fancy take a look. Good atmosphere for sure. Goraintzi  +++$+++ :: Yes, it's basically about keeping track of the new username. Oops, the exact place of the event is Ordizia, urriak 16, with a claim for self-determination as a backdrop. Scotland vs the World in Highlands Games + other events (ref. uneairitsida.net) if you fancy take a look. Good atmosphere for sure. Goraintzi [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 19:13, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

3411 +++$+++ Unai Fdz. de Betoño +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-06 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.286411220E09 +++$+++ Kaixo, Akerbeltz! Bandalismoa dela-eta ingelesezko wikipedia erdi utzi duzula irakurri dut zure lankide-orrialdean... Animoak emateko idazten nizun, besterik gabe. Opor batzuk hartu, baina laster itzuli! Zure lan eskerga behar-beharrezkoa baita! Adiorik ez! -- +++$+++ Kaixo, Akerbeltz! Bandalismoa dela-eta ingelesezko wikipedia erdi utzi duzula irakurri dut zure lankide-orrialdean... Animoak emateko idazten nizun, besterik gabe. Opor batzuk hartu, baina laster itzuli! Zure lan eskerga behar-beharrezkoa baita! Adiorik ez! --[[User:Unai Fdz. de Betoño|Unai Fdz. de Betoño]] ([[User talk:Unai Fdz. de Betoño|talk]]) 17:27, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
3412 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3411 +++$+++ 3411 +++$+++ 2010-10-07 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.286509080E09 +++$+++ Milesker animoak emateagatik, laguna. Hainbeste mezuak :) Beno, ikusiko dugu... agian berezko opor batzuk baino ez dut beharrik!  +++$+++ :Milesker animoak emateagatik, laguna. Hainbeste mezuak :) Beno, ikusiko dugu... agian berezko opor batzuk baino ez dut beharrik! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 20:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

3413 +++$+++ An13sa +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-09 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.286679420E09 +++$+++ Kaixo Akerbeltz! Ikusi dut Eskoziako gaeleraz badakizula itzuliko zenidake hizkuntza horretara ''Ongi etorri Eskoziako atarira'' edo ''Welcome to the Scotland Portal''. Milesker eta animo!!!-- +++$+++ Kaixo Akerbeltz! Ikusi dut Eskoziako gaeleraz badakizula itzuliko zenidake hizkuntza horretara ''Ongi etorri Eskoziako atarira'' edo ''Welcome to the Scotland Portal''. Milesker eta animo!!!--[[User:An13sa|An13sa]] ([[User talk:An13sa|talk]]) 19:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
3414 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3413 +++$+++ 3413 +++$+++ 2010-10-09 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.286683380E09 +++$+++ Noski, honaxe duzu: ''F\xe0ilte gu portal na h-Alba''. Izan untsa!  +++$+++ :Noski, honaxe duzu: ''Fàilte gu portal na h-Alba''. Izan untsa! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 21:03, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
3415 +++$+++ An13sa +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3413 +++$+++ 3414 +++$+++ 2010-10-10 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.286757420E09 +++$+++ Milesker.-- +++$+++ ::Milesker.--[[User:An13sa|An13sa]] ([[User talk:An13sa|talk]]) 17:37, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

265559 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 06:08:00 +++$+++ 1.163081280E09 +++$+++ <small>Stupid and inconsiderate remark removed by original poster<\/small> &mdash; +++$+++ <small>Stupid and inconsiderate remark removed by original poster</small> &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 06:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265560 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265559 +++$+++ 265559 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.163103000E09 +++$+++ [[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] blocked for this see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Hanuman_Das]. -- +++$+++ :[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] blocked for this see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Hanuman_Das]. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 12:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265561 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265559 +++$+++ 265560 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.163106720E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I'm sorry that you received the above message.  I see that the user has been blocked.  Yes there is a procedure, which is to file a report at [[WP:AN\/I]].  However, since the user has already been blocked, you should not file a report.  The purpose of the report is to hopefully get the attention of an admin, something that has already occurred.  Again, I'm sorry for the abuse.  -- +++$+++ ::Hi Mattisse, I'm sorry that you received the above message.  I see that the user has been blocked.  Yes there is a procedure, which is to file a report at [[WP:AN/I]].  However, since the user has already been blocked, you should not file a report.  The purpose of the report is to hopefully get the attention of an admin, something that has already occurred.  Again, I'm sorry for the abuse.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 13:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265562 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265559 +++$+++ 265561 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.163107020E09 +++$+++ Hi, and I am also sorry that I failed to remove the title of this attack from my edit summary. Now it shows up in history lists.  Yuck!  -- +++$+++ :::Hi, and I am also sorry that I failed to remove the title of this attack from my edit summary. Now it shows up in history lists.  Yuck!  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 13:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

3416 +++$+++ Lexein +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3416 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-24 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.287916740E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk%3AAntonio_Arnaiz-Villena#Arnaiz-Villena_was_sacked_from_Editorial_Board. Here, ] you remark \"look who's back\" without mentioning a name.  This is, I must say, a smidge snarky, and doesn't help me quickly understand what may be a volatile situation. The claim that the person was dismissed is supported by the citation presented.  It is my belief that it can be written in a neutral way, conforming to the letter and spirit of [[WP:BLP]].   It is not my intention to debate the subject of the article, politics or anything beyond this one claim and its RS citation. Is it your position that the claim and citation SHOULD or SHOULD NOT be added to the article?  Please reply here - I watch my watchlist. Thank you. -- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AAntonio_Arnaiz-Villena#Arnaiz-Villena_was_sacked_from_Editorial_Board. Here, ] you remark "look who's back" without mentioning a name.  This is, I must say, a smidge snarky, and doesn't help me quickly understand what may be a volatile situation. The claim that the person was dismissed is supported by the citation presented.  It is my belief that it can be written in a neutral way, conforming to the letter and spirit of [[WP:BLP]].   It is not my intention to debate the subject of the article, politics or anything beyond this one claim and its RS citation. Is it your position that the claim and citation SHOULD or SHOULD NOT be added to the article?  Please reply here - I watch my watchlist. Thank you. --[[User:Lexein|Lexein]] ([[User talk:Lexein|talk]]) 03:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
3417 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3416 +++$+++ 3416 +++$+++ 2010-10-24 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.287939060E09 +++$+++ It's actually very snarky ;) You could read the entire talk page but in short: there's an editor who virtually all of us believe to be Arnaiz-Villena himself who's furious that Wikipedia calls a spade a spade and dares mention some of the professional nonsense he was produced over his career. His posts share several things in common: personal attacks on other editors, grand threats and bombastic claims without any supporting evidence. He has wasted a massive amount of our time on [[Antonio Arnaiz-Villena]], [[Iberian language]] and various deleted pages. His appearance has rarely heralded peace and harmony but he had been quiet for quite some time and I had dared hope that we'd seen the last of it. Apparently not. kwami removed a line from the text that was contradicting itself and partly unsubstantiated. Virginal then does his usual shooting himself in the foot by raising a ruckus over a claim that technically is a critical point about AV (his removal from the board), something he complains about without end. Illogical to say the least. Hence my remark.  +++$+++ :It's actually very snarky ;) You could read the entire talk page but in short: there's an editor who virtually all of us believe to be Arnaiz-Villena himself who's furious that Wikipedia calls a spade a spade and dares mention some of the professional nonsense he was produced over his career. His posts share several things in common: personal attacks on other editors, grand threats and bombastic claims without any supporting evidence. He has wasted a massive amount of our time on [[Antonio Arnaiz-Villena]], [[Iberian language]] and various deleted pages. His appearance has rarely heralded peace and harmony but he had been quiet for quite some time and I had dared hope that we'd seen the last of it. Apparently not. kwami removed a line from the text that was contradicting itself and partly unsubstantiated. Virginal then does his usual shooting himself in the foot by raising a ruckus over a claim that technically is a critical point about AV (his removal from the board), something he complains about without end. Illogical to say the least. Hence my remark. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 09:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

3418 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-04 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.288899000E09 +++$+++ How's the atmosphere in the north? Listen I opened a discussion in Basque people about the picture showing some Basque characters. I'd appreciate your contribution, since no definite decision has been made so far. Jaso agur bero bat  +++$+++ How's the atmosphere in the north? Listen I opened a discussion in Basque people about the picture showing some Basque characters. I'd appreciate your contribution, since no definite decision has been made so far. Jaso agur bero bat [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 12:30, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
3419 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3418 +++$+++ 3418 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.288906980E09 +++$+++ Eskerrik asko; egia duzu, some aren't suitable at all. Orrialde hartan erantzun dut.  +++$+++ :Eskerrik asko; egia duzu, some aren't suitable at all. Orrialde hartan erantzun dut. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 14:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

265563 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265563 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.163110200E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you liked my writing regarding the image mediation.  The reason why I became somewhat disturbed is that I am the person responsible for bringing the mediator to the issue.  It seemed like the right thing to do at the time.  I had hoped that instead of skipping over the arguments and proceeding fairly quickly to attempts at compromise, we would evaluate the arguments in as neutral a fashion as possible.  Of course my impressions are colored by my preconceptions.  However, it is my impression that many of the issues that have been raised have  not received direct responses.  So I was disappointed by the direction in which things were going, even though I was the one who set things in motion.  However, it is inevitable that we make mistakes in judging what we ought to do, and I ought not judge myself to harshly.  So, how is ''your'' day. :-)  -- +++$+++ I'm glad you liked my writing regarding the image mediation.  The reason why I became somewhat disturbed is that I am the person responsible for bringing the mediator to the issue.  It seemed like the right thing to do at the time.  I had hoped that instead of skipping over the arguments and proceeding fairly quickly to attempts at compromise, we would evaluate the arguments in as neutral a fashion as possible.  Of course my impressions are colored by my preconceptions.  However, it is my impression that many of the issues that have been raised have  not received direct responses.  So I was disappointed by the direction in which things were going, even though I was the one who set things in motion.  However, it is inevitable that we make mistakes in judging what we ought to do, and I ought not judge myself to harshly.  So, how is ''your'' day. :-)  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 14:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265564 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265563 +++$+++ 265563 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.163113260E09 +++$+++ I don't think you are being hard headed.  One has to choose where one will expend energy, and if a given effort seems to lack value, there is nothing wrong with avoiding it.  However, if you don't participate in the mediation, the other editors will be able to hold it against you should you wish to continue editting the articles related to starwood.  They will say that you did not particate in estsablishing the consensus, and therefore your edits are disruptive.  It is therefore a tough choice to make whether to participate or not.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :I don't think you are being hard headed.  One has to choose where one will expend energy, and if a given effort seems to lack value, there is nothing wrong with avoiding it.  However, if you don't participate in the mediation, the other editors will be able to hold it against you should you wish to continue editting the articles related to starwood.  They will say that you did not particate in estsablishing the consensus, and therefore your edits are disruptive.  It is therefore a tough choice to make whether to participate or not.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 15:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

3420 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-09 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.289370480E09 +++$+++ I'm going through untemplated IPA, and deleting, templating, or sub'ing as necessary. There are some places where IPA symbols are conventional for non-IPA usage, such as in pIE reconstructions in some sources, so if this is conventional for Basque, I'll leave it alone. (It's just s.t. that keeps popping up on my radar.) \u2014  +++$+++ I'm going through untemplated IPA, and deleting, templating, or sub'ing as necessary. There are some places where IPA symbols are conventional for non-IPA usage, such as in pIE reconstructions in some sources, so if this is conventional for Basque, I'll leave it alone. (It's just s.t. that keeps popping up on my radar.) — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 22:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
3421 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3420 +++$+++ 3420 +++$+++ 2010-11-09 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.289372100E09 +++$+++ I think I'd replace all those superscripts escept where he's using them in an etymology. Does that help any?  +++$+++ :I think I'd replace all those superscripts escept where he's using them in an etymology. Does that help any? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 22:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
3422 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3420 +++$+++ 3421 +++$+++ 2010-11-09 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.289375940E09 +++$+++ BTW, I've got all the Cantonese IPA in sync, at least everything that links to IPA-yue. I copied IPA tone marking from what we have for Lao, as that seemed to be legible, but can switch from [\u1e77] to [\u0215] for Tone 4 if you think that would be better. Also, I've dropped the [j] or [w] from init. ''yi, yu, wu'', and added glottal stop to other init vowels. That can also be changed. \u2014  +++$+++ ::BTW, I've got all the Cantonese IPA in sync, at least everything that links to IPA-yue. I copied IPA tone marking from what we have for Lao, as that seemed to be legible, but can switch from [ṷ] to [ȕ] for Tone 4 if you think that would be better. Also, I've dropped the [j] or [w] from init. ''yi, yu, wu'', and added glottal stop to other init vowels. That can also be changed. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 23:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
3423 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3420 +++$+++ 3422 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.289411520E09 +++$+++ I'll check Cantonese later. What's the reason fro dropping the initial [w] and [j] though? Phonemic status I guess, as you either get a glottal stop or an initial glide? Is that helpful to people though?  +++$+++ :::I'll check Cantonese later. What's the reason fro dropping the initial [w] and [j] though? Phonemic status I guess, as you either get a glottal stop or an initial glide? Is that helpful to people though? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 09:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
3424 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3420 +++$+++ 3423 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.289414040E09 +++$+++ Basque articles flagged for \u02b0: [[Kakueta]], [[Saison (river)]], [[Sardeka]], [[Uhabia]], [[Uhaitxa]], [[Ur (root)]], [[Zihiga]], [[Aphanize]], [[Aran (river)]], [[Barhoue]], [[Bidouze]]. \u2014  +++$+++ ::::Basque articles flagged for ʰ: [[Kakueta]], [[Saison (river)]], [[Sardeka]], [[Uhabia]], [[Uhaitxa]], [[Ur (root)]], [[Zihiga]], [[Aphanize]], [[Aran (river)]], [[Barhoue]], [[Bidouze]]. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 10:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
3425 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3420 +++$+++ 3424 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.289421180E09 +++$+++ No, we don't have \/\u0265\/. Orthographic w- and y- initials really are \/w-\/ and \/j-\/, I've never seem them described as anything else either, my own speech aside. There's a lot more frication that in a soft onset vowel in these words, my strong inclination would be to stick with \/ja ji jo... wa we wo...\/. If only to avoid folk slightly less familiar with the phonetic detail from adding a glottal stop because if you wrote \/jyt jy\/ as \/yt y\/, I would hazard a guess that people would actually end up saying \/\u0294yt \u0294y\/.  +++$+++ :::::No, we don't have /ɥ/. Orthographic w- and y- initials really are /w-/ and /j-/, I've never seem them described as anything else either, my own speech aside. There's a lot more frication that in a soft onset vowel in these words, my strong inclination would be to stick with /ja ji jo... wa we wo.../. If only to avoid folk slightly less familiar with the phonetic detail from adding a glottal stop because if you wrote /jyt jy/ as /yt y/, I would hazard a guess that people would actually end up saying /ʔyt ʔy/. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 12:33, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
3426 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3420 +++$+++ 3425 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.289447460E09 +++$+++ So there's an unrounded onset to \/jy\/? I'll fix [[Wikipedia:IPA for Cantonese]]. \u2014  +++$+++ ::::::So there's an unrounded onset to /jy/? I'll fix [[Wikipedia:IPA for Cantonese]]. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 19:51, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

262714 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-11 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.184218080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your support. I'll have another look for Judith E. Heumann photos, but that was the best I could find at the time, that I was reasonably sure was OK to copy. BTW: Do you know David Onley's date of birth? I hope that with all the publicity, we'll be able to improve the information in the list and also in his own article. Cheers,  +++$+++ Thanks for your support. I'll have another look for Judith E. Heumann photos, but that was the best I could find at the time, that I was reasonably sure was OK to copy. BTW: Do you know David Onley's date of birth? I hope that with all the publicity, we'll be able to improve the information in the list and also in his own article. Cheers, [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
262715 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262714 +++$+++ 262714 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.184282940E09 +++$+++ As for Heumann, that likely is the only image you'll find. Would you like me to reupload it as a JPG though, which is Wikipedia's preferred format for photos...?  --   +++$+++ : As for Heumann, that likely is the only image you'll find. Would you like me to reupload it as a JPG though, which is Wikipedia's preferred format for photos...?  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 16:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
262716 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262714 +++$+++ 262715 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.184283180E09 +++$+++ Sure, if it is no trouble. It has a transparent background that I suspect you'll need to change to white as I don't think JPG has transparencies. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Sure, if it is no trouble. It has a transparent background that I suspect you'll need to change to white as I don't think JPG has transparencies. Cheers, [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
262717 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262714 +++$+++ 262716 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.184283480E09 +++$+++ Would you like a transparency in the file? I can save it as a PNG, and retain that element. Either way's plenty fine with me.  --   +++$+++ ::: Would you like a transparency in the file? I can save it as a PNG, and retain that element. Either way's plenty fine with me.  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 16:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

3427 +++$+++ Iñaki LL +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-18 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.290137700E09 +++$+++ Kaixo Akerbeltz, Aizu, after the last fixes in [[Basque music]] I realised the article (\"the\") is missing in the \"Northern Basque Country\" but sounds strange to me. Since I'm no native don't dare change it and wanted to ask. I know there is Northern Ireland, but there is \"the Basque Country\" too. There's a repetition too that has to be deleted after the mends. Agur bero bat  +++$+++ Kaixo Akerbeltz, Aizu, after the last fixes in [[Basque music]] I realised the article ("the") is missing in the "Northern Basque Country" but sounds strange to me. Since I'm no native don't dare change it and wanted to ask. I know there is Northern Ireland, but there is "the Basque Country" too. There's a repetition too that has to be deleted after the mends. Agur bero bat [[User:Iñaki LL|Iñaki LL]] ([[User talk:Iñaki LL|talk]]) 19:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
3428 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3427 +++$+++ 3427 +++$+++ 2010-11-18 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.290138840E09 +++$+++ Done!  +++$+++ :Done! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 19:54, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

3429 +++$+++ Böri +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3429 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-19 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.292790840E09 +++$+++ I asked it before but I'm asking it again: Was it a Basque state? Can we say that?  +++$+++ I asked it before but I'm asking it again: Was it a Basque state? Can we say that? [[User:Böri|Böri]] ([[User talk:Böri|talk]]) 12:34, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
3430 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3429 +++$+++ 3429 +++$+++ 2010-12-19 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.292798160E09 +++$+++ Answering there.  +++$+++ :Answering there. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 14:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

3431 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-06 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.297015200E09 +++$+++ This has been nominated for deletion on the grounds that it is not being used..... \"You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Scottish Placenames|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]].\"  +++$+++ This has been nominated for deletion on the grounds that it is not being used..... "You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Scottish Placenames|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]." [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 10:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
3432 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3431 +++$+++ 3431 +++$+++ 2011-02-26 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.298779920E09 +++$+++ Sorry - somehow I missed the actual discussion - I honestly don't know except that I think we just started using generic boxes rather than a template. No harm done I think.  +++$+++ :Sorry - somehow I missed the actual discussion - I honestly don't know except that I think we just started using generic boxes rather than a template. No harm done I think. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 20:12, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

3433 +++$+++ Deacon of Pndapetzim +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3433 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-27 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.298860380E09 +++$+++ Akerbeltz, since you have something to do with these things, I wonder if you can tell me what the authority of ''Taigh Mh\xe0rtainn'' is? Does this have an authentic continuity with pre-modern usage? In early\/high medieval sources it is ''Futerna'' and [possibly] ''Rosnat'', but Tigh\/Tech Martain would make sense too as the house was dedicated to Martin of Tours.  +++$+++ Akerbeltz, since you have something to do with these things, I wonder if you can tell me what the authority of ''Taigh Mhàrtainn'' is? Does this have an authentic continuity with pre-modern usage? In early/high medieval sources it is ''Futerna'' and [possibly] ''Rosnat'', but Tigh/Tech Martain would make sense too as the house was dedicated to Martin of Tours. [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 18:33, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
3434 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3433 +++$+++ 3433 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.298862720E09 +++$+++ Hm all I can tell you in a hurry is that the source for all those three names is Iain Mac an T\xe0illeir (or rather ''a'' source). The ''taigh\/tigh\/tech''variation is just spelling changes over the ages. Are you wanting to know where Mac an T\xe0illeir got them from?  +++$+++ :Hm all I can tell you in a hurry is that the source for all those three names is Iain Mac an Tàilleir (or rather ''a'' source). The ''taigh/tigh/tech''variation is just spelling changes over the ages. Are you wanting to know where Mac an Tàilleir got them from? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 19:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
3435 +++$+++ Deacon of Pndapetzim +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3433 +++$+++ 3434 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.298863800E09 +++$+++ Tigh\/Tech are just Old Irish and British forms supplied by me from witnesses for other like names. ;) Yes, I'd like to know where Iain Mac an T\xe0illeir got it from ... if you are able to tell me that, that would be great. :) I am just needing to know if it is a genuine form or made up; the *Tigh names for churches are quite old in Britain, but I've no idea if this one is. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Tigh/Tech are just Old Irish and British forms supplied by me from witnesses for other like names. ;) Yes, I'd like to know where Iain Mac an Tàilleir got it from ... if you are able to tell me that, that would be great. :) I am just needing to know if it is a genuine form or made up; the *Tigh names for churches are quite old in Britain, but I've no idea if this one is. Regards, [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 19:30, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
3436 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3433 +++$+++ 3435 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.298865060E09 +++$+++ Not sure but I can ask him. He certainly doesn't make them up. As far as the taigh goes, that's down to the way the Old Irish declensions disintegrated. Tech used to be the nominative, tige the gentive and tig the dative... plus a few others. Modern Irish went with teach\/tigh, Gaelic with t(a)igh.  +++$+++ :::Not sure but I can ask him. He certainly doesn't make them up. As far as the taigh goes, that's down to the way the Old Irish declensions disintegrated. Tech used to be the nominative, tige the gentive and tig the dative... plus a few others. Modern Irish went with teach/tigh, Gaelic with t(a)igh. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 19:51, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
3437 +++$+++ Deacon of Pndapetzim +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3433 +++$+++ 3436 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.298866560E09 +++$+++ Cheers, that would be very useful! All the best,  +++$+++ ::::Cheers, that would be very useful! All the best, [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 20:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
3438 +++$+++ Deacon of Pndapetzim +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3433 +++$+++ 3436 +++$+++ 2011-03-27 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.301275140E09 +++$+++ On another point, on the article [[Islay]] the ogg file doesn't match the IPA. The article also lacks a Gaelic ogg. Since this is probably Scotland's most important island historically and since you do these things, could you remedy this? All the best,  +++$+++ :::: On another point, on the article [[Islay]] the ogg file doesn't match the IPA. The article also lacks a Gaelic ogg. Since this is probably Scotland's most important island historically and since you do these things, could you remedy this? All the best, [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 18:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
3439 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3433 +++$+++ 3438 +++$+++ 2011-03-27 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.301275380E09 +++$+++ He hasn't I'm afraid. I listened to \xccle, which sounds fine to me, what do you think is wrong? I'm happy to do more oggs but i can't spot anything on the page which would require them except perhaps the name of the magazine? Which ones were you thinking of?  +++$+++ :::::He hasn't I'm afraid. I listened to Ìle, which sounds fine to me, what do you think is wrong? I'm happy to do more oggs but i can't spot anything on the page which would require them except perhaps the name of the magazine? Which ones were you thinking of? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 18:23, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
3440 +++$+++ Deacon of Pndapetzim +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3433 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-27 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.301275920E09 +++$+++ RE the IP; sorry, my mistake. There is a Gaelic one on the side (thought there wasn't one!). The problem was with the English one. He's saying it with the vowel in Scottish English ''bite'' rather than Scottish English ''eye'' ... I had been led to believe this is \u0259i rather than a\u026a.  +++$+++ ::::::: RE the IP; sorry, my mistake. There is a Gaelic one on the side (thought there wasn't one!). The problem was with the English one. He's saying it with the vowel in Scottish English ''bite'' rather than Scottish English ''eye'' ... I had been led to believe this is əi rather than aɪ. [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 18:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

265579 +++$+++ AdelaMae +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.163136720E09 +++$+++ I noticed the reference to [[WP:EL]] in the edit summaries of your edits removing the links to their official webpages.  WP:EL states, \"An article about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to that entity's official site, if there is one.\"  I would assume that nearly all organizations and persons would publish their own official website - isn't that what makes official websites official?  So I see no justification in WP:EL for removing those links. -  +++$+++ I noticed the reference to [[WP:EL]] in the edit summaries of your edits removing the links to their official webpages.  WP:EL states, "An article about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to that entity's official site, if there is one."  I would assume that nearly all organizations and persons would publish their own official website - isn't that what makes official websites official?  So I see no justification in WP:EL for removing those links. - [[User:AdelaMae|AdelaMa]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]] <sup>([[User_talk:AdelaMae|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/AdelaMae|contribs]])</sup> 21:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265580 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265579 +++$+++ 265579 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.163138640E09 +++$+++ In the case of [[Selena Fox]] I copied that edit summary from  one of the edit summaries of [[User:Ekajati]] because she is thought to be an expert. But maybe I was wrong in doing so, as looking through [[WP:EL]] right now, I don't see it. So maybe she is wrong. In any case, the article has been reverted by [[User:Hanuman Das]] and the link is restored. I will check into it more, but I apologize if I was wrong. In the case of [[Phyllis Curott]] there are no reference citations per [[WP:V]] and [[WP:CITE]]. [[Ralph Bass]] is an example of a referenced article. There are better examples and I will find more if you want. In any case, that article also has been reverted by [[User:Hanuman Das]] and what was there before my edit is now restored. Hope this helps    +++$+++ :In the case of [[Selena Fox]] I copied that edit summary from  one of the edit summaries of [[User:Ekajati]] because she is thought to be an expert. But maybe I was wrong in doing so, as looking through [[WP:EL]] right now, I don't see it. So maybe she is wrong. In any case, the article has been reverted by [[User:Hanuman Das]] and the link is restored. I will check into it more, but I apologize if I was wrong. In the case of [[Phyllis Curott]] there are no reference citations per [[WP:V]] and [[WP:CITE]]. [[Ralph Bass]] is an example of a referenced article. There are better examples and I will find more if you want. In any case, that article also has been reverted by [[User:Hanuman Das]] and what was there before my edit is now restored. Hope this helps   [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 22:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265581 +++$+++ AdelaMae +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265579 +++$+++ 265580 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.163162460E09 +++$+++ I knew the links had been reverted, but I wanted to make sure that you got some explanation for it.  You're right that the [[Phyllis Curott]] article needs verification, and I've added it to the list on [[WP:WPN|WikiProject Neopaganism]].  -  +++$+++ ::I knew the links had been reverted, but I wanted to make sure that you got some explanation for it.  You're right that the [[Phyllis Curott]] article needs verification, and I've added it to the list on [[WP:WPN|WikiProject Neopaganism]].  - [[User:AdelaMae|AdelaMa]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]] <sup>([[User_talk:AdelaMae|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/AdelaMae|contribs]])</sup> 04:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
265582 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265579 +++$+++ 265581 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.163162760E09 +++$+++ I'm very appreciative of your reply and glad that you seek to improve the article as all work in that direction helps us all at Wikipedia. Thanks!   +++$+++ :::I'm very appreciative of your reply and glad that you seek to improve the article as all work in that direction helps us all at Wikipedia. Thanks!  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 04:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

527724 +++$+++ Paddu +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-28 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.180376280E09 +++$+++ I noticed that your bot removed the \"orphan\" tag from some images like [[:Image:Netscape47.png]], [[:Image:MainPage-Netscape3win-brion.png]], [[:Image:MainPage-Netscape4winfixed-brion.png]]. However, my image [[:Image:Main-Page-netscape4.79-redhat-linux-7.3-paddu.png]] got deleted being considered an orphan. Do you feel all these images should be treated similarly? Thanks! --  +++$+++ I noticed that your bot removed the "orphan" tag from some images like [[:Image:Netscape47.png]], [[:Image:MainPage-Netscape3win-brion.png]], [[:Image:MainPage-Netscape4winfixed-brion.png]]. However, my image [[:Image:Main-Page-netscape4.79-redhat-linux-7.3-paddu.png]] got deleted being considered an orphan. Do you feel all these images should be treated similarly? Thanks! -- [[User:Paddu|Paddu]] 11:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
527725 +++$+++ Paddu +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527724 +++$+++ 527724 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.180506420E09 +++$+++ All of these were\/are in use at only [[Wikipedia:Main Page\/Screenshots]] and nowhere else, including my screenshot. --  +++$+++ :All of these were/are in use at only [[Wikipedia:Main Page/Screenshots]] and nowhere else, including my screenshot. -- [[User:Paddu|Paddu]] 23:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

584960 +++$+++ PSUMark2006 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-22 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.203672600E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for your trust! I've been away for quite a while but would love to get involved in the community again, and this might just be the motivation I need!  +++$+++ Hey, thanks for your trust! I've been away for quite a while but would love to get involved in the community again, and this might just be the motivation I need! [[User:PSUMark2006|PSUMark2006]] ([[User talk:PSUMark2006|talk]]) 01:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
584961 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584960 +++$+++ 584960 +++$+++ 2008-02-22 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.203676680E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! Regarding becoming more active again, while I understand you've been busy in real life, it'll be great for you have the chance to edit more often. :)  +++$+++ :You're welcome! Regarding becoming more active again, while I understand you've been busy in real life, it'll be great for you have the chance to edit more often. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 02:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

265583 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.163138100E09 +++$+++ Occassionaly I have good advice for people, but in this situation I'm afraid I don't know what you should do to prepare.  I think your best bet is to ask someone else for advice, perhaps a few someone elses.  I will try to keep your question in mind, and if I have any thoughts I will relay them to you.  Sorry to be of such little help.  And please do not worry about bothering me.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Occassionaly I have good advice for people, but in this situation I'm afraid I don't know what you should do to prepare.  I think your best bet is to ask someone else for advice, perhaps a few someone elses.  I will try to keep your question in mind, and if I have any thoughts I will relay them to you.  Sorry to be of such little help.  And please do not worry about bothering me.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 21:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265584 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265583 +++$+++ 265583 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.163139840E09 +++$+++ There is an admin [[User:Glen S]] that left a friendly note on your page once.  Try him? -- +++$+++ :There is an admin [[User:Glen S]] that left a friendly note on your page once.  Try him? --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265585 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265583 +++$+++ 265583 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.163140080E09 +++$+++ Also you might try to get advice from [[User:Redvers]].  He (I assume it is a he) gave me a barnstar so he must be decent ;-D.  (Only kidding, but I do think he is decent.  -- +++$+++ :Also you might try to get advice from [[User:Redvers]].  He (I assume it is a he) gave me a barnstar so he must be decent ;-D.  (Only kidding, but I do think he is decent.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265586 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265583 +++$+++ 265585 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.163143740E09 +++$+++ It looks as though they are filing a RfC [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Mattisse | here]].  They need to notify you when it is complete, and they need to certify it.  After that, you can respond.  I think once they notify you, you should send messages to Calton, Samir, JzG, and a few others notifying them that a RfC has been  put in place against you, and could they please comment.  -- +++$+++ ::It looks as though they are filing a RfC [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mattisse | here]].  They need to notify you when it is complete, and they need to certify it.  After that, you can respond.  I think once they notify you, you should send messages to Calton, Samir, JzG, and a few others notifying them that a RfC has been  put in place against you, and could they please comment.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265587 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265583 +++$+++ 265585 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.163150340E09 +++$+++ DOn't worry about the RfC its all old news now delt with. They will shoot themselves in the foot with this. Just keep cool. -- +++$+++ ::DOn't worry about the RfC its all old news now delt with. They will shoot themselves in the foot with this. Just keep cool. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 01:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

3442 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-16 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.300336200E09 +++$+++ Hi, could you look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Keith,_Moray&curid=1460039&diff=418984420&oldid=416101657 this edit]? Seems pretty doubtful to me but what do I know? Taing, -- +++$+++ Hi, could you look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Keith,_Moray&curid=1460039&diff=418984420&oldid=416101657 this edit]? Seems pretty doubtful to me but what do I know? Taing, --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 21:30, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
3443 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3442 +++$+++ 3442 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.300340580E09 +++$+++ Had a go, what do you think?  +++$+++ :Had a go, what do you think? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 22:43, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
3444 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3442 +++$+++ 3443 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.300340640E09 +++$+++ PS might make more sense to do a page on [[Gaelic in Moray]] rather than deal with it village by village, what say you?  +++$+++ ::PS might make more sense to do a page on [[Gaelic in Moray]] rather than deal with it village by village, what say you? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 22:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
3445 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3442 +++$+++ 3444 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.300349820E09 +++$+++ Yes, that would seem better. My first idea was that it might be better still to incorporate it into a 'Moray' article, but we don't seem to have one, I mean one which would deal with Moray as a general term\/historical area with changing boundaries, just ones for particular (former or current) [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Moray_%28disambiguation%29 political units]... -- +++$+++ :::Yes, that would seem better. My first idea was that it might be better still to incorporate it into a 'Moray' article, but we don't seem to have one, I mean one which would deal with Moray as a general term/historical area with changing boundaries, just ones for particular (former or current) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moray_%28disambiguation%29 political units]... --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 01:17, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
3446 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3442 +++$+++ 3445 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.300352460E09 +++$+++ Withers IS a good read. Well, a good book for data anyway. We could stick it into the Moray council area, it's broadly the same; I've done sections like that before, ===Gaelic in Moray\/Skye\/Mull etc. in the demographics section. Please feel free to move it there, the next few days I'll be a bit busy.  +++$+++ ::::Withers IS a good read. Well, a good book for data anyway. We could stick it into the Moray council area, it's broadly the same; I've done sections like that before, ===Gaelic in Moray/Skye/Mull etc. in the demographics section. Please feel free to move it there, the next few days I'll be a bit busy. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 02:01, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
3447 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3442 +++$+++ 3446 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.300388220E09 +++$+++ Done. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Moray&diff=419282961&oldid=418354416][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Keith,_Moray&diff=419283613&oldid=419199370] -- +++$+++ :::::Done. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moray&diff=419282961&oldid=418354416][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Keith,_Moray&diff=419283613&oldid=419199370] --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 11:57, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
3448 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3442 +++$+++ 3447 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.300395120E09 +++$+++ Great, m\xf2ran taing!  +++$+++ ::::::Great, mòran taing! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 13:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
3449 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3442 +++$+++ 3448 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.300408740E09 +++$+++ 'S e do bheatha\/same to you! -- +++$+++ :::::::'S e do bheatha/same to you! --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 17:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

527733 +++$+++ Maxamegalon2000 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.180613520E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I noticed that you speedy deleted [[Blue Prism]].  I have no interest in the article, and only noticed it while skimming AfD and noticing that [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Blue Prism]] contained a red link heading despite a reasonably significant number of \"keep\" votes.  I thought perhaps you were unaware of this, and just thought I'd mention it.  Thanks.  -- +++$+++ Hi.  I noticed that you speedy deleted [[Blue Prism]].  I have no interest in the article, and only noticed it while skimming AfD and noticing that [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Prism]] contained a red link heading despite a reasonably significant number of "keep" votes.  I thought perhaps you were unaware of this, and just thought I'd mention it.  Thanks.  --[[User:Maxamegalon2000|Maxa]][[User_talk:Maxamegalon2000|megalon]][[Special:Contributions/Maxamegalon2000|2000]] 05:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
527734 +++$+++ Maxamegalon2000 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527733 +++$+++ 527733 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.180647300E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  It looks like a strange AfD; the nomination appears to have gone a month without being added to the listing.  -- +++$+++ :Thanks.  It looks like a strange AfD; the nomination appears to have gone a month without being added to the listing.  --[[User:Maxamegalon2000|Maxa]][[User_talk:Maxamegalon2000|megalon]][[Special:Contributions/Maxamegalon2000|2000]] 14:35, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

350100 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ Laurascudder +++$+++ 350100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-12 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.208067420E09 +++$+++ Could I ask a favor?  Could you please look over [[action potential]] and see if it explains everything OK?  I'm not worried yet about MoS stuff, just whether the article is ''intelligible'' to smart people like you, and has a reasonably logical order of presentation. :)  Of course, if you had any other suggestions, I'd be grateful for those as well.  Thanks muchly!  +++$+++ Could I ask a favor?  Could you please look over [[action potential]] and see if it explains everything OK?  I'm not worried yet about MoS stuff, just whether the article is ''intelligible'' to smart people like you, and has a reasonably logical order of presentation. :)  Of course, if you had any other suggestions, I'd be grateful for those as well.  Thanks muchly! [[User:WillowW|Willow]] ([[User talk:WillowW|talk]]) 23:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
350101 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ Laurascudder +++$+++ 350100 +++$+++ 350100 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.209088440E09 +++$+++ We've been working on [[action potential]] pretty diligently, and it might be at [[WP:FA|Featured Article]] quality.  Would you have time to read through the article and see if you agree?  If you do, please vote '''Keep''' at [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Action potential|its FAR]]; otherwise, if you could give us some ideas of what you'd like improved, that's be great.  Thanks and thanks,  +++$+++ :We've been working on [[action potential]] pretty diligently, and it might be at [[WP:FA|Featured Article]] quality.  Would you have time to read through the article and see if you agree?  If you do, please vote '''Keep''' at [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Action potential|its FAR]]; otherwise, if you could give us some ideas of what you'd like improved, that's be great.  Thanks and thanks, [[User:WillowW|Willow]] ([[User talk:WillowW|talk]]) 18:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

3450 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-18 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.300478100E09 +++$+++ Saw your note on Mac's talk page, so I moved it anyway. Note that you don't need to be an admin to reverse a move, ''provided'' the redirect created by the original redirect created by the move has ''not'' been edited. -- +++$+++ Saw your note on Mac's talk page, so I moved it anyway. Note that you don't need to be an admin to reverse a move, ''provided'' the redirect created by the original redirect created by the move has ''not'' been edited. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001|talk]]) 12:55, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
3451 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3450 +++$+++ 3450 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.300478280E09 +++$+++ Ah. Ok, thank you very much - both for moving and for teaching me something new!  +++$+++ :Ah. Ok, thank you very much - both for moving and for teaching me something new! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 12:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

3452 +++$+++  +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-18 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.300509600E09 +++$+++ Kaixo Akerbeltz! Zure erabiltzaile orrian euskaraz badakizula irakurri dudanez, euskaraz idatzi dizut. [http:\/\/gd.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Euskalduna#Nire_Irudiak_.2F_My_ImagesUser:Euskalduna Nire erabiltzaile orrialdeko testua] euskaratik Eskoziako gaelerara itzul al zenezaken eskatu nahiko nizuke. Eskerrik asko aldez aurretik. Ongi izan! - [[:eu:Lankide:Euskalduna|Euskalduna]] 21:40, 18 March 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ Kaixo Akerbeltz! Zure erabiltzaile orrian euskaraz badakizula irakurri dudanez, euskaraz idatzi dizut. [http://gd.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Euskalduna#Nire_Irudiak_.2F_My_ImagesUser:Euskalduna Nire erabiltzaile orrialdeko testua] euskaratik Eskoziako gaelerara itzul al zenezaken eskatu nahiko nizuke. Eskerrik asko aldez aurretik. Ongi izan! - [[:eu:Lankide:Euskalduna|Euskalduna]] 21:40, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
3453 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3452 +++$+++ 3452 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.301376660E09 +++$+++ Hiya. Well, how you pronounce it in English depends on the accent, there are some pretty radical difference between [[Scottish English]] and Southern English. In Scottish English it would be \/bon'\u0254\u02d0\/ (stress on the second syllable). The Gaelic is easier ;) That's {{IPA-gd|pun'a.\u0259|}} in close transcription. Hope that helps.  +++$+++ :Hiya. Well, how you pronounce it in English depends on the accent, there are some pretty radical difference between [[Scottish English]] and Southern English. In Scottish English it would be /bon'ɔː/ (stress on the second syllable). The Gaelic is easier ;) That's {{IPA-gd|pun'a.ə|}} in close transcription. Hope that helps. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 22:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
3454 +++$+++ Blast furnace chip worker +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3452 +++$+++ 3453 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.301438760E09 +++$+++ Is the pronunciation [bone\u026aw] acceptable (permissible) too? Is the pronounciation bahn-uh-way (I read this like [b\u028cn-\u028c-wei ]) correctly too? Are all these variants permissibles or not?  +++$+++ ::Is the pronunciation [boneɪw] acceptable (permissible) too? Is the pronounciation bahn-uh-way (I read this like [bʌn-ʌ-wei ]) correctly too? Are all these variants permissibles or not? [[User:Blast furnace chip worker|Blast furnace chip worker]] ([[User talk:Blast furnace chip worker|talk]]) 15:46, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

3457 +++$+++ Blast furnace chip worker +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-01 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.301708160E09 +++$+++ There is no Atlas on my native language which contains information about such small settlement like Taynuilt is, so I need your halp. Thank you for your attantion and I am sorry for the trouble I am giving you.  +++$+++ There is no Atlas on my native language which contains information about such small settlement like Taynuilt is, so I need your halp. Thank you for your attantion and I am sorry for the trouble I am giving you. [[User:Blast furnace chip worker|Blast furnace chip worker]] ([[User talk:Blast furnace chip worker|talk]]) 18:36, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
3458 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3457 +++$+++ 3457 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.301708460E09 +++$+++ Hehe sure. The Scottish version ''Taynuilt'' is normally pronounced \/t\u025bin\u0259lt\/, the Gaelic is \/t\u032a\u02b0\u0264j \u0259 n\u032a\u02e0\u026fi\u028et\u02b2\/ \"the house of the stream\". Best of luck with your essay!  +++$+++ :Hehe sure. The Scottish version ''Taynuilt'' is normally pronounced /tɛinəlt/, the Gaelic is /t̪ʰɤj ə n̪ˠɯiʎtʲ/ "the house of the stream". Best of luck with your essay! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 18:41, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
3459 +++$+++ Blast furnace chip worker +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3457 +++$+++ 3458 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.301710020E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your answer. Now I need to have consult about spelling of the word Taynuilt on my native language with wikipidians from my country (who speak English professionaly) and then I'll start to write the article.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for your answer. Now I need to have consult about spelling of the word Taynuilt on my native language with wikipidians from my country (who speak English professionaly) and then I'll start to write the article. [[User:Blast furnace chip worker|Blast furnace chip worker]] ([[User talk:Blast furnace chip worker|talk]]) 19:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
3460 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3457 +++$+++ 3459 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.301712420E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. By the way, what IS your native language?  +++$+++ :::You're welcome. By the way, what IS your native language? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 19:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
3461 +++$+++ Blast furnace chip worker +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3457 +++$+++ 3460 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.301716680E09 +++$+++ I'd like ask you one quation before I'll answer your question. I think You are native (Scottish) English speaker or at list about this, so you have listened  many variants and foreign accents of the English. Being taking account of my grammatical mistakes you have seen in my texts , can you conjecture where am I from? Is it posible to do that?   +++$+++ ::::I'd like ask you one quation before I'll answer your question. I think You are native (Scottish) English speaker or at list about this, so you have listened  many variants and foreign accents of the English. Being taking account of my grammatical mistakes you have seen in my texts , can you conjecture where am I from? Is it posible to do that?  [[User:Blast furnace chip worker|Blast furnace chip worker]] ([[User talk:Blast furnace chip worker|talk]]) 20:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

481174 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481174 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-18 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.155959040E09 +++$+++ Sir,can you point me out which kind of [[WP:NPOV]] I have disobeyed?In expectation of your response +++$+++ Sir,can you point me out which kind of [[WP:NPOV]] I have disobeyed?In expectation of your response[[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]] 20:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
481175 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481174 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.155960000E09 +++$+++ that is what I want to say, during the [[Tropical Storm Bilis (2006)]] which more than 600 deaths also in china, and the [[Saomai]] which more than 400 deaths, I see no help from the international society. Isn't it strange\uff1f NO, not even a simple pity. How can we react when the [[Hurricane Katrina]] which cause more than 1000 mens and womens' lives to be 'given' more care while the the two former reveived nothing\uff1f I just want to clarify one thing, they deserve more! while nothing were offered. And  [[Saomai]] is the deadliest and costliest storm in China since 1956. +++$+++ ::that is what I want to say, during the [[Tropical Storm Bilis (2006)]] which more than 600 deaths also in china, and the [[Saomai]] which more than 400 deaths, I see no help from the international society. Isn't it strange？ NO, not even a simple pity. How can we react when the [[Hurricane Katrina]] which cause more than 1000 mens and womens' lives to be 'given' more care while the the two former reveived nothing？ I just want to clarify one thing, they deserve more! while nothing were offered. And  [[Saomai]] is the deadliest and costliest storm in China since 1956.[[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]] 21:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
481176 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481174 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.155960660E09 +++$+++ So the fact which I want to state here is that ''There is no help'',isn't it one sort of fact\uff1fAnd which kind of [[WP:NPOV]] I haved disobeyed\uff1f +++$+++ :::So the fact which I want to state here is that ''There is no help'',isn't it one sort of fact？And which kind of [[WP:NPOV]] I haved disobeyed？[[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]] 21:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
481177 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481174 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.155961320E09 +++$+++ let's compare the two result of goolesearch[http:\/\/www.google.com.sg\/search?hl=en&rls=GGGL,GGGL:2006-26,GGGL:zh-CN&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=saomai+international+response&spell=1] and [http:\/\/www.google.com.sg\/search?hl=en&rls=GGGL%2CGGGL%3A2006-26%2CGGGL%3Azh-CN&q=Katrina+international+response&btnG=Search&meta=] +++$+++ ::::let's compare the two result of goolesearch[http://www.google.com.sg/search?hl=en&rls=GGGL,GGGL:2006-26,GGGL:zh-CN&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=saomai+international+response&spell=1] and [http://www.google.com.sg/search?hl=en&rls=GGGL%2CGGGL%3A2006-26%2CGGGL%3Azh-CN&q=Katrina+international+response&btnG=Search&meta=][[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]] 21:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
481178 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481174 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.155961860E09 +++$+++ to support my POV\uff0c\uff29hope you read this article[http:\/\/www.canada.com\/topics\/news\/world\/story.html?id=66aba4ad-4a6c-4f04-87ea-5d02d996fcb5&k=8308] +++$+++ :::::to support my POV，Ｉhope you read this article[http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=66aba4ad-4a6c-4f04-87ea-5d02d996fcb5&k=8308][[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]] 21:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
481179 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481174 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.155962520E09 +++$+++ It's grotesque to make separte aftermaths for this storm,let's compare [[Hurricane Katrina]] which influence both [[USA]] and [[Cuba]],can you see any seperated aftermaths\uff1f +++$+++ ::::::It's grotesque to make separte aftermaths for this storm,let's compare [[Hurricane Katrina]] which influence both [[USA]] and [[Cuba]],can you see any seperated aftermaths？[[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]] 21:42, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

3462 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-01 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.301720940E09 +++$+++ Ufff... I would have guessed a Spanish speaking background but I'm not that good at this sort of thing ;)  +++$+++ Ufff... I would have guessed a Spanish speaking background but I'm not that good at this sort of thing ;) [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 22:09, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
3463 +++$+++ Blast furnace chip worker +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3462 +++$+++ 3462 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.301761980E09 +++$+++ Well, I am not from Spain. I cann't tell you where I live at present because of there is a [[Privacy policy]] in Wikipedia but I can tell you where I come from. My motherland is [[Ukraine]] (by Scotish [[sco:Ukraine|Ukraine]], by G\xe0idhlig [[:gd:An \xd9crain|An \xd9crain]] ) and my native language is [[Ukrainian language|Ukrainian]] (by Scotish [[sco:Ukrainian leid|Ukrainian leid]], by G\xe0idhlig [[:gd:\xd9crainis|\xd9crainis]]).  +++$+++ :Well, I am not from Spain. I cann't tell you where I live at present because of there is a [[Privacy policy]] in Wikipedia but I can tell you where I come from. My motherland is [[Ukraine]] (by Scotish [[sco:Ukraine|Ukraine]], by Gàidhlig [[:gd:An Ùcrain|An Ùcrain]] ) and my native language is [[Ukrainian language|Ukrainian]] (by Scotish [[sco:Ukrainian leid|Ukrainian leid]], by Gàidhlig [[:gd:Ùcrainis|Ùcrainis]]). [[User:Blast furnace chip worker|Blast furnace chip worker]] ([[User talk:Blast furnace chip worker|talk]]) 09:33, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

3464 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-03 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.301890920E09 +++$+++ Hi, it occurred to me that it would be good if we had for the anniversary of the [[Declaration of Arbroath]] the Gaelic pronunciation [[Arbroath|here]], so I'd like to ask - shouldn't it be ''Obar'' Bhrothaig (rather than ''Obair''), and is my guess at {{IPA-gd|\u02cc\u0254p\u0259\u027e \u02c8v\u027e\u0264ik\u02b2|}} correct? -- +++$+++ Hi, it occurred to me that it would be good if we had for the anniversary of the [[Declaration of Arbroath]] the Gaelic pronunciation [[Arbroath|here]], so I'd like to ask - shouldn't it be ''Obar'' Bhrothaig (rather than ''Obair''), and is my guess at {{IPA-gd|ˌɔpəɾ ˈvɾɤikʲ|}} correct? --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 21:22, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
3465 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3464 +++$+++ 3464 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.301891160E09 +++$+++ Yes, should be Obar Bhrothaig \/op\u0259\u027e'v\u027eo.\u026ak\u02b2\/ (o before hiatus is almost invariable round o. You almost had it though!  +++$+++ :Yes, should be Obar Bhrothaig /opəɾ'vɾo.ɪkʲ/ (o before hiatus is almost invariable round o. You almost had it though! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 21:26, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
3466 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3464 +++$+++ 3465 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.301892060E09 +++$+++ Wow, that was quick! Implemented, thanks! -- +++$+++ ::Wow, that was quick! Implemented, thanks! --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 21:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

3467 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-08 09:14:00 +++$+++ 1.304871240E09 +++$+++ Hi, it's me again, this time with [[Ballachulish]] - would it be {{IPA-en|\u02ccbal\u0259\u02c8xul\u026a\u0283|}} for en and {{IPA-gd|\u02ccbal\u0259\u02c8 (\u0259) \u02c8x\u026f:l\u026a\u0283|}} for gd? (Currently we have \"pronounced Bah - lah - hoolish by incomers\"...) -- +++$+++ Hi, it's me again, this time with [[Ballachulish]] - would it be {{IPA-en|ˌbaləˈxulɪʃ|}} for en and {{IPA-gd|ˌbaləˈ (ə) ˈxɯ:lɪʃ|}} for gd? (Currently we have "pronounced Bah - lah - hoolish by incomers"...) --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 09:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
3468 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3467 +++$+++ 3467 +++$+++ 2011-05-08 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.304876040E09 +++$+++ Yuck. {{IPA-en|\u02ccbal\u0259\u02c8xul\u026a\u0283|}} or x~h seems reasonable for English, Gaelic is {{IPA-gd|bal\u0259\u02c8x\u026f:l\u02e0\u032a\u026a\u0283|}}. There's also {{IPA-gd|glan\u032a\u02e0\u0259\u02c8x\u026f:l\u02e0\u032a\u026a\u0283|}} needed a bit further down. Maybe we should use the IPA infobox (see [[Skye]]) to keep the IPA for anything but the main name out of the main text, it gets a bit intrusive and we could add the others too, like \/pe\u0272\u0259\u02c8ve.\u026a\u027e\u02b2\/ \/\u02c8ia\u0272 \u02c8k\u02b2\u02b0al\u02e0\u032a\u026a\/.  +++$+++ :Yuck. {{IPA-en|ˌbaləˈxulɪʃ|}} or x~h seems reasonable for English, Gaelic is {{IPA-gd|baləˈxɯ:lˠ̪ɪʃ|}}. There's also {{IPA-gd|glan̪ˠəˈxɯ:lˠ̪ɪʃ|}} needed a bit further down. Maybe we should use the IPA infobox (see [[Skye]]) to keep the IPA for anything but the main name out of the main text, it gets a bit intrusive and we could add the others too, like /peɲəˈve.ɪɾʲ/ /ˈiaɲ ˈkʲʰalˠ̪ɪ/. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 10:34, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
3469 +++$+++ Thrissel +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3467 +++$+++ 3468 +++$+++ 2011-05-08 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.304883240E09 +++$+++ Good idea, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ballachulish&diff=428067533&oldid=426031645 done]. Added {{IPA-gd|glan\u032aval\u0259\u02c8x\u026f:i\u028e|}} by myself, please correct it if it's wrong. Thanks! -- +++$+++ ::Good idea, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ballachulish&diff=428067533&oldid=426031645 done]. Added {{IPA-gd|glan̪valəˈxɯ:iʎ|}} by myself, please correct it if it's wrong. Thanks! --[[User:Thrissel|Thrissel]] ([[User talk:Thrissel|talk]]) 12:34, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

3470 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-10 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.302486900E09 +++$+++ I have noticed it is just the two of us at [[Talk:Scottish Highlands]] - the comparison with the 2006 discussion in the great pioneering days is interesting. I am beginning to think the 'pedia is a sort of [[Metric expansion of space|Expanding Universe]] in which the expansion is created by the endless increase in new articles but the number of established editors is fixed or diminishing, leaving them spread over a wider and wider territory. Apparently special relativity does not apply and the expansion of space is not constrained by the speed of light. There may therefore come a time when we are each lost in our own vast empires with no means of contacting one another. Serves us right for working in the ''\u0391\u1f31\u03b2\u03bf\u1fe6\u03b4\u03b1\u03b9'' on the Sabbath.  +++$+++ I have noticed it is just the two of us at [[Talk:Scottish Highlands]] - the comparison with the 2006 discussion in the great pioneering days is interesting. I am beginning to think the 'pedia is a sort of [[Metric expansion of space|Expanding Universe]] in which the expansion is created by the endless increase in new articles but the number of established editors is fixed or diminishing, leaving them spread over a wider and wider territory. Apparently special relativity does not apply and the expansion of space is not constrained by the speed of light. There may therefore come a time when we are each lost in our own vast empires with no means of contacting one another. Serves us right for working in the ''Αἱβοῦδαι'' on the Sabbath. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 18:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
3471 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3470 +++$+++ 3470 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.302739260E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome! And you've hit the nail on the head about the waving. I fear for Wikipedia if more isn't done that gives meaningful support to bona fide editors. It's so easy to break Wikipedia and takes so long to fix and that's not right. Ah well...  +++$+++ :You're very welcome! And you've hit the nail on the head about the waving. I fear for Wikipedia if more isn't done that gives meaningful support to bona fide editors. It's so easy to break Wikipedia and takes so long to fix and that's not right. Ah well... [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 17:01, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

527760 +++$+++ Aditya Kabir +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527760 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-04 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.180994760E09 +++$+++ '''Thanks'''. One more question - can someone remove that fair use disputed tag? If it keeps hanging there another bot may take it to be a very suitable candidate to delete. If my reasoning on the talk page is no good, then I'm ready to withdraw this appeal.  +++$+++ '''Thanks'''. One more question - can someone remove that fair use disputed tag? If it keeps hanging there another bot may take it to be a very suitable candidate to delete. If my reasoning on the talk page is no good, then I'm ready to withdraw this appeal. [[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya Kabir]] 15:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
527761 +++$+++ Aditya Kabir +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527760 +++$+++ 527760 +++$+++ 2007-06-04 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.180995060E09 +++$+++ '''Post Script''' Sorry to bother you again. But, could you care to take a look at this image too - [[:Image:Riya Calendar.jpg]]? Is it alright by WP criterion? I'm pretty confidant it is, and if not the articles could be enhanced to meet the need. Please, advise.  +++$+++ :'''Post Script''' Sorry to bother you again. But, could you care to take a look at this image too - [[:Image:Riya Calendar.jpg]]? Is it alright by WP criterion? I'm pretty confidant it is, and if not the articles could be enhanced to meet the need. Please, advise. [[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya Kabir]] 15:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

3473 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-17 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.303056540E09 +++$+++ I am struggling to find anything that would provide a meaningful derivation for ''[[Eileanan Chearabhaigh]]''. \"Dusky islands\", \"Cheara's bay islands\"? Any suggestions gratefully received. You might also enjoy a chuckle at the pronunciation note at [[Hugh of Sleat]].   +++$+++ I am struggling to find anything that would provide a meaningful derivation for ''[[Eileanan Chearabhaigh]]''. "Dusky islands", "Cheara's bay islands"? Any suggestions gratefully received. You might also enjoy a chuckle at the pronunciation note at [[Hugh of Sleat]].  [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 09:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
3474 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3473 +++$+++ 3473 +++$+++ 2011-04-17 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.303089180E09 +++$+++ <winces> thanks for mentioning that one. I'll think about Cearsabhaigh.  +++$+++ :<winces> thanks for mentioning that one. I'll think about Cearsabhaigh. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 18:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

265618 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-13 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.163469900E09 +++$+++ I again thank your for your comments which are more flattering than I probably deserve.  We will see how the mediation goes.  I see that a great deal of progress has been made with your communication with Hanuman Das.  That is very good, and I imagine it brings quite  a bit of relief.  Thank you again for your work on dams and rivers etc. I hope you don't mind that I made some adjustments to [[Sivasamudram Falls]] the other day.  Also, there is one other phrase in some of your articles that I'd like to correct, but I'm not sure of the proper way to rephrase it.  The Western Ghats and the Eastern Ghats are mountain ranges.  I am not sure if there is an exact definition of the Deccan plateau, but in my mind, the plateau per se does not include the Ghats.  This is not to say that there are no mountains on the plateau, there are, but these are mostly the isolated remains of extinct volcanos, and stick out very suddenly in an otherwise relatively flat landscape.  There is nothing at all flat about the Ghats, and so I would not include them in the plateau.  Of course, others might differ with me.  So,  regarding various rivers, I would say that they begin in the Eastern\/Western Ghats, and then flow across the Deccan plateau.  -- +++$+++ I again thank your for your comments which are more flattering than I probably deserve.  We will see how the mediation goes.  I see that a great deal of progress has been made with your communication with Hanuman Das.  That is very good, and I imagine it brings quite  a bit of relief.  Thank you again for your work on dams and rivers etc. I hope you don't mind that I made some adjustments to [[Sivasamudram Falls]] the other day.  Also, there is one other phrase in some of your articles that I'd like to correct, but I'm not sure of the proper way to rephrase it.  The Western Ghats and the Eastern Ghats are mountain ranges.  I am not sure if there is an exact definition of the Deccan plateau, but in my mind, the plateau per se does not include the Ghats.  This is not to say that there are no mountains on the plateau, there are, but these are mostly the isolated remains of extinct volcanos, and stick out very suddenly in an otherwise relatively flat landscape.  There is nothing at all flat about the Ghats, and so I would not include them in the plateau.  Of course, others might differ with me.  So,  regarding various rivers, I would say that they begin in the Eastern/Western Ghats, and then flow across the Deccan plateau.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
265619 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265618 +++$+++ 265618 +++$+++ 2006-11-13 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.163474340E09 +++$+++ Yes, it can be frustrating to explain something repeatedly only to have it ignored.  Hopefully, there will be better communication soon.  -- +++$+++ :Yes, it can be frustrating to explain something repeatedly only to have it ignored.  Hopefully, there will be better communication soon.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 19:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

3475 +++$+++ Justlettersandnumbers +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3475 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-25 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.303773420E09 +++$+++ Hi! I think you will like this (if you haven't already seen it). I notice that the Euskara article on the Giara Horse, of which unfortunately I cannot understand one word, is entitled Achetta zaldi; the Dutch one is also under Achetta. I had thought that this ''achetta'' as applied to the Giara Horse was simply a mistake, as Sardinian dictionaries of the 19th century give ''achetu''\/''acheta'' to mean a medium or small horse without specification of breed; but am coming to think that the distinction of breeds had just not developed at that time. Anyway, probably the article should be moved to Giara zaldi, as ''achetta'' is a near-obsolete word (not in sc.wikipedia), and the little horse is now called \"Giara\". But: imagine my pleasure at reading today that ''achetta'' derives from the old Spanish ''haca'', and thus from \"Hackney\"!<br> +++$+++ Hi! I think you will like this (if you haven't already seen it). I notice that the Euskara article on the Giara Horse, of which unfortunately I cannot understand one word, is entitled Achetta zaldi; the Dutch one is also under Achetta. I had thought that this ''achetta'' as applied to the Giara Horse was simply a mistake, as Sardinian dictionaries of the 19th century give ''achetu''/''acheta'' to mean a medium or small horse without specification of breed; but am coming to think that the distinction of breeds had just not developed at that time. Anyway, probably the article should be moved to Giara zaldi, as ''achetta'' is a near-obsolete word (not in sc.wikipedia), and the little horse is now called "Giara". But: imagine my pleasure at reading today that ''achetta'' derives from the old Spanish ''haca'', and thus from "Hackney"!<br>[[User:Justlettersandnumbers|Justlettersandnumbers]] ([[User talk:Justlettersandnumbers|talk]]) 16:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
3476 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3475 +++$+++ 3475 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.303775700E09 +++$+++ Ya the dutch page also uses this name. I looked up both on the main Sardinian dictionary, both terms I think are equally vague. Gi\xe0ra [http:\/\/www.ditzionariu.org] just means \"plateau\/tableland\" in Sardinian. Acheta\/Ach\xe9tu (\"small horse\") seems to be linked to ''\xe0ca'' (also \"small horse\") but also under the variant \"vacheta\" which looks more like the root for cow. Now there's any number of possible explanations... I'll check more sources but I'll also drop a note to the Basque teams, thanks for mentioning it!  +++$+++ :Ya the dutch page also uses this name. I looked up both on the main Sardinian dictionary, both terms I think are equally vague. Giàra [http://www.ditzionariu.org] just means "plateau/tableland" in Sardinian. Acheta/Achétu ("small horse") seems to be linked to ''àca'' (also "small horse") but also under the variant "vacheta" which looks more like the root for cow. Now there's any number of possible explanations... I'll check more sources but I'll also drop a note to the Basque teams, thanks for mentioning it! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 16:55, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
3477 +++$+++ Justlettersandnumbers +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3475 +++$+++ 3476 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.303837740E09 +++$+++ Well, I certainly don't want to attempt to comment on an article I can't read. But '''if''' the link from [[Giara horse]] to [[eu:Achetta zaldi]] is correctly made, then the name could perhaps be changed. The horse is today called ''Cavallino della Giara'', and is named after the largest of the ''giare'', the [[Giara di Gesturi]], where it now mostly lives. I have now idea how recent or ancient that name is, but suspect the former. ''Achetta'' is not in common use today; I asked a Sardinian about it last night, and got only a blank look. +++$+++ ::Well, I certainly don't want to attempt to comment on an article I can't read. But '''if''' the link from [[Giara horse]] to [[eu:Achetta zaldi]] is correctly made, then the name could perhaps be changed. The horse is today called ''Cavallino della Giara'', and is named after the largest of the ''giare'', the [[Giara di Gesturi]], where it now mostly lives. I have now idea how recent or ancient that name is, but suspect the former. ''Achetta'' is not in common use today; I asked a Sardinian about it last night, and got only a blank look.[[User:Justlettersandnumbers|Justlettersandnumbers]] ([[User talk:Justlettersandnumbers|talk]]) 10:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
3478 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3475 +++$+++ 3477 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.303843320E09 +++$+++ Looks like it is. I've added some info. Asking a Sardinian per se is tricky, Gallurese, spoken at the northern end, is technically a Corsican dialect rather than Sardinian. It's complicated ;) But by gum does \"hackney\" get around.  +++$+++ :::Looks like it is. I've added some info. Asking a Sardinian per se is tricky, Gallurese, spoken at the northern end, is technically a Corsican dialect rather than Sardinian. It's complicated ;) But by gum does "hackney" get around. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:42, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

265620 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-14 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.163502480E09 +++$+++ It's not another person. It's already a gang effort, on both sides. Has been going on for some time, check the histories. &mdash; +++$+++ It's not another person. It's already a gang effort, on both sides. Has been going on for some time, check the histories. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 03:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
265621 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265620 +++$+++ 265620 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.163505420E09 +++$+++ Clearly, he thinks [[User:Rottentomatoe]] is a sock. Could be. Looks like [[User:Pete K]] has been holding his own for quite some time against a couple of editors, but recently, two or three new single purpose accounts have appeared, all on the same side. That's rather suspicious, don't you think? &mdash; +++$+++ :Clearly, he thinks [[User:Rottentomatoe]] is a sock. Could be. Looks like [[User:Pete K]] has been holding his own for quite some time against a couple of editors, but recently, two or three new single purpose accounts have appeared, all on the same side. That's rather suspicious, don't you think? &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 03:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
265622 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265620 +++$+++ 265620 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.163505420E09 +++$+++ By the way, I posted an article RfC to get some more eyes on it. I almost always do that when 999 is trying to stop a revert warrior. If a few other people show up and try to keep order, it tends to improve everything. That and getting the revert warrrior out of the way for a day or two. Sometimes other editors mysteriously dissappear at the same time (due to autoblocking). Curious, that. &mdash; +++$+++ :By the way, I posted an article RfC to get some more eyes on it. I almost always do that when 999 is trying to stop a revert warrior. If a few other people show up and try to keep order, it tends to improve everything. That and getting the revert warrrior out of the way for a day or two. Sometimes other editors mysteriously dissappear at the same time (due to autoblocking). Curious, that. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 03:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
265623 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265620 +++$+++ 265622 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.163510220E09 +++$+++ Here's info on article RfCs: [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment#Request_comment_on_articles]]. &mdash; +++$+++ ::Here's info on article RfCs: [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment#Request_comment_on_articles]]. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 05:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

3479 +++$+++ Derekbd +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3479 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-01 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.304249280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for rewriting that bit on the place-name. It had seemed like something that had just been thrown in there without regard for the paragraph. Cheers.  +++$+++ Thanks for rewriting that bit on the place-name. It had seemed like something that had just been thrown in there without regard for the paragraph. Cheers. [[User:Derekbd|Derekbd]] ([[User talk:Derekbd|talk]]) 04:28, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
3480 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3479 +++$+++ 3479 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.304269500E09 +++$+++ No probs, glad you're happy with it now!  +++$+++ :No probs, glad you're happy with it now! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 10:05, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

527768 +++$+++ Jossi +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527768 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.181042220E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=&user=%5Edemon&page=&pattern=&limit=500&offset=0 What is going on?] Care to explain?  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=&user=%5Edemon&page=&pattern=&limit=500&offset=0 What is going on?] Care to explain? [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 04:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
527769 +++$+++ Jossi +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527768 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.181042580E09 +++$+++ I would suggest that you ''slow down'' with these deletions. You are deleting images that have proper fair use tags, and there are comments piling up on your user page about your actions. Although I appreciate the effort of clearing the backlogs, I would argue that rather than delete the images that you check for fair use and add the fair use statement on these images who's use is obvious. Please reply here and not in my talk page.  +++$+++ :: I would suggest that you ''slow down'' with these deletions. You are deleting images that have proper fair use tags, and there are comments piling up on your user page about your actions. Although I appreciate the effort of clearing the backlogs, I would argue that rather than delete the images that you check for fair use and add the fair use statement on these images who's use is obvious. Please reply here and not in my talk page. [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 04:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
527770 +++$+++ Jossi +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527768 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.181043240E09 +++$+++ \"They\" are contributors, without which we would not have this project. Just '''slow down with these mass deletions''', in particular book covers and CD covers that are used specifically to illustrate the article on the book or album in question.   +++$+++ ::::"They" are contributors, without which we would not have this project. Just '''slow down with these mass deletions''', in particular book covers and CD covers that are used specifically to illustrate the article on the book or album in question.  [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 04:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

3481 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3481 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-07 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.304836500E09 +++$+++ I just created a stub at [[Paleo-Sardinian language]]. I haven't had a chance to look at Ferrer 2010, who evidently believes there's a Basque connection, but it's been \"synthesized\" [http:\/\/www.noticiasdealava.com\/2011\/03\/01\/opinion\/tribuna-abierta\/euskera-y-paleosardo-parientes-cercanos here]. What do you think of the toponyms (end of article)? Is Paleosardo worth linking from Basque or Iberian? \u2014  +++$+++ I just created a stub at [[Paleo-Sardinian language]]. I haven't had a chance to look at Ferrer 2010, who evidently believes there's a Basque connection, but it's been "synthesized" [http://www.noticiasdealava.com/2011/03/01/opinion/tribuna-abierta/euskera-y-paleosardo-parientes-cercanos here]. What do you think of the toponyms (end of article)? Is Paleosardo worth linking from Basque or Iberian? — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 23:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
3482 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3481 +++$+++ 3481 +++$+++ 2011-05-08 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.304846460E09 +++$+++ There's a scathing evaluation of Ferrer somewhere, though I can't think of it just now. Paleo-Sardinian does look weird and non-IE but the Basque link has been tried and found to be wanting before. At a glance, it looks like the usual surface junk theory. He includes ''mando'' which is almost unversally seens as a Celtic loan these days.  +++$+++ :There's a scathing evaluation of Ferrer somewhere, though I can't think of it just now. Paleo-Sardinian does look weird and non-IE but the Basque link has been tried and found to be wanting before. At a glance, it looks like the usual surface junk theory. He includes ''mando'' which is almost unversally seens as a Celtic loan these days. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 02:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

3483 +++$+++ 4pq1injbok +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-20 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.305882600E09 +++$+++ Was the last of these the focus of your objection?  I would want to analyse the situation so that the lenited version of the slender R archiphoneme is {{IPA|\/\u027e\u02b2\/}}, but that the slender R archiphoneme doesn't occur initially at all, i.e. it's broad even where spelled with a front vowel.   +++$+++ Was the last of these the focus of your objection?  I would want to analyse the situation so that the lenited version of the slender R archiphoneme is {{IPA|/ɾʲ/}}, but that the slender R archiphoneme doesn't occur initially at all, i.e. it's broad even where spelled with a front vowel.  [[User:4pq1injbok|4pq1injbok]] ([[User talk:4pq1injbok|talk]]) 02:10, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
3484 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3483 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-20 09:56:00 +++$+++ 1.305910560E09 +++$+++ Hope that's a bit clearer :)  +++$+++ ::Hope that's a bit clearer :) [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 09:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
3485 +++$+++ 4pq1injbok +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3483 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-23 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.306142280E09 +++$+++ Is there at least a true statement to a similar effect that one might put there, without engendering more confusion than it clears?  +++$+++ :::Is there at least a true statement to a similar effect that one might put there, without engendering more confusion than it clears? [[User:4pq1injbok|4pq1injbok]] ([[User talk:4pq1injbok|talk]]) 02:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
3486 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3483 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-23 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.306173120E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! It's not the most obvious of writing systems, even if it IS very regular. I've added something. I can add another statement on their lenited values but wouldn't that get too long and overlap with the Lenition article?  +++$+++ ::::You're welcome! It's not the most obvious of writing systems, even if it IS very regular. I've added something. I can add another statement on their lenited values but wouldn't that get too long and overlap with the Lenition article? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 10:52, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

527772 +++$+++ Jaksmata +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.181090880E09 +++$+++ If your bot has a \u201cdo not edit these templates\u201d list, you might consider adding these two.  +++$+++ If your bot has a “do not edit these templates” list, you might consider adding these two. [[User:Jaksmata|Jaksmata]] 17:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
527773 +++$+++ EVula +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527772 +++$+++ 527772 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.181123760E09 +++$+++ Satanist, too! [[User:EVula|EVula]] <span style=\"color: #999;\">\/\/ [[User talk:EVula|talk]] \/\/  +++$+++ :Satanist, too! [[User:EVula|EVula]] <span style="color: #999;">// [[User talk:EVula|talk]] // [[User:EVula/admin|<span style="color: #366;">&#9775;</span>]] //</span> 02:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

527774 +++$+++ Paddu +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-06 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.181131080E09 +++$+++ All the images mentioned were in use only in the page [[Wikipedia:Main Page\/Screenshots]] and nowhere else. Are such images considered orphan or not? I believe either all of them should be considered as orphans or none of them should be considered so. --  +++$+++ All the images mentioned were in use only in the page [[Wikipedia:Main Page/Screenshots]] and nowhere else. Are such images considered orphan or not? I believe either all of them should be considered as orphans or none of them should be considered so. -- [[User:Paddu|Paddu]] 04:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
527775 +++$+++ Paddu +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527774 +++$+++ 527774 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.181131680E09 +++$+++ Are images used only in [[Wikipedia:Main Page\/Screenshots]] considered orphans? If yes, why did you untag the images I mentioned which have always been used only in that page and nowhere else? --  +++$+++ :Are images used only in [[Wikipedia:Main Page/Screenshots]] considered orphans? If yes, why did you untag the images I mentioned which have always been used only in that page and nowhere else? -- [[User:Paddu|Paddu]] 05:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
527776 +++$+++ Paddu +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527774 +++$+++ 527775 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.181132100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification! --  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the clarification! -- [[User:Paddu|Paddu]] 05:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

3487 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3487 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-21 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.306003920E09 +++$+++ I am working on a new article about [[Funzie Girt dyke]], which is apparently pronounced \"[fin-ee girt]\". In my first ever attempt to get to grips with IPA I have guessed {{IPA-en|f\u026a\u0273i \u0261\u026art|}}. Brickbats expected and corrections welcome.  +++$+++ I am working on a new article about [[Funzie Girt dyke]], which is apparently pronounced "[fin-ee girt]". In my first ever attempt to get to grips with IPA I have guessed {{IPA-en|fɪɳi ɡɪrt|}}. Brickbats expected and corrections welcome. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 11:52, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
3488 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3487 +++$+++ 3487 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.306005840E09 +++$+++ I'm assuming it's the (Scottish) English pronunciation you are wanting? I think you're close, I'd just tweak it to {{IPA-en|f\u026anji \u0261\u026art|}} because English doesn't really do true palatals, it usually just adds on a glide. I've just checked Chambers Scots dictionary and they also transcribe sequences like -lunzie as \/nj\/. Hope that helps - look forward to seeing it, it sounds bizarre :)  +++$+++ :I'm assuming it's the (Scottish) English pronunciation you are wanting? I think you're close, I'd just tweak it to {{IPA-en|fɪnji ɡɪrt|}} because English doesn't really do true palatals, it usually just adds on a glide. I've just checked Chambers Scots dictionary and they also transcribe sequences like -lunzie as /nj/. Hope that helps - look forward to seeing it, it sounds bizarre :) [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 12:24, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
3489 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3487 +++$+++ 3487 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.306006200E09 +++$+++ Nice. The other spelling rang a bell, you know of the Muckle Reel of Finnigirt?  +++$+++ :Nice. The other spelling rang a bell, you know of the Muckle Reel of Finnigirt? [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 12:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
3490 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3487 +++$+++ 3489 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.306011840E09 +++$+++ Many thanks. I'm afraid I don't know the reel - is it played in your part or the world?  +++$+++ ::Many thanks. I'm afraid I don't know the reel - is it played in your part or the world? [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 14:04, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
3491 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3487 +++$+++ 3490 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.306012080E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! I don't personally either, I just remember the name from a uni lecture cause it was so amusing.  +++$+++ :::You're welcome! I don't personally either, I just remember the name from a uni lecture cause it was so amusing. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 14:08, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

44272 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Truco +++$+++ 44272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.307948340E09 +++$+++ {{Wikipedia:WikiProject United States\/Newsletter\/Newsletter link|June 2011}}-- +++$+++ {{Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/Newsletter/Newsletter link|June 2011}}--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 23:59, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
44273 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ Truco +++$+++ 44272 +++$+++ 44272 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308781320E09 +++$+++ Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives\u2014which houses some of America's most important historical documents\u2014is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/NARA\/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]].  +++$+++ :Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]]. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

464405 +++$+++ SkierRMH +++$+++ ProveIt +++$+++ 464405 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-22 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.195793760E09 +++$+++ As per discussion there, I moved this from speedy renaming to [[Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion\/Log\/2007\/November\/22]]. Since you had input in the first, I'm notifying you of the second :)  +++$+++ As per discussion there, I moved this from speedy renaming to [[Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/November/22]]. Since you had input in the first, I'm notifying you of the second :) [[User:SkierRMH|SkierRMH]] ([[User talk:SkierRMH|talk]]) 20:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
464406 +++$+++ ProveIt +++$+++ ProveIt +++$+++ 464405 +++$+++ 464405 +++$+++ 2007-11-23 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.195808100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know... -- <i> +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know... -- <i>[[User:ProveIt|Prove It]] <sup>[[User talk:ProveIt|(talk)]]</sup></i> 00:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

265636 +++$+++ Balajiviswanathan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265636 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.163645280E09 +++$+++ The aim is to create content for every major Hindu temple. Many of them have immense historic value and considerable religious importance. So, I'm trying to build articles on them. It is not possible in a day, but over the course of next one year, it is possible to build a detailed article for around 100 major temples in Tamilnadu, with their historical and religious significance. It is as simple as that.  +++$+++ The aim is to create content for every major Hindu temple. Many of them have immense historic value and considerable religious importance. So, I'm trying to build articles on them. It is not possible in a day, but over the course of next one year, it is possible to build a detailed article for around 100 major temples in Tamilnadu, with their historical and religious significance. It is as simple as that. [[User:Balajiviswanathan|Balajiviswanathan]] 18:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
265637 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265636 +++$+++ 265636 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.163645940E09 +++$+++ Have you checked the articles that exist already? There are many people interested in temples and you don't want to exclude them from your plans. Articles are supposed to be collaborations, not single person projects. Also, you have to cite references for your material per [[WP:CITE]]. Did you look at the links I sent you?   +++$+++ :Have you checked the articles that exist already? There are many people interested in temples and you don't want to exclude them from your plans. Articles are supposed to be collaborations, not single person projects. Also, you have to cite references for your material per [[WP:CITE]]. Did you look at the links I sent you?  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 18:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
265638 +++$+++ Balajiviswanathan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265636 +++$+++ 265636 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.163646120E09 +++$+++ For the last few days I'm checking out the various categories where Hindu temples are there and doing my assessments. I've also moved a number of India-struct-stub and other categories where Hindu temples were there to Hindu-temple-stub. I've also added more categories based on deity, location etc and re-categorized a lot them from top level categories - Hindu temples and Hindu temples in India. In this process, I found dozens of duplicate articles and I've merged them with the main article. I'm also changing titles to dissambiguate better. Regarding multiple temples with same name, I'm adding the city name at the end and for temples with multiple names (Thiruvanaikaval, Tiruvanaikkavall,Jambukeswarar temple...) I've created redirections. I believe that Wikipedia should contain info on all these temples as these are all 1000 year old temples of significant value to Hinduism. And, I'm slowly trying to get these into colloboration modes, starting with the most important one, Tirupathy.  +++$+++ :For the last few days I'm checking out the various categories where Hindu temples are there and doing my assessments. I've also moved a number of India-struct-stub and other categories where Hindu temples were there to Hindu-temple-stub. I've also added more categories based on deity, location etc and re-categorized a lot them from top level categories - Hindu temples and Hindu temples in India. In this process, I found dozens of duplicate articles and I've merged them with the main article. I'm also changing titles to dissambiguate better. Regarding multiple temples with same name, I'm adding the city name at the end and for temples with multiple names (Thiruvanaikaval, Tiruvanaikkavall,Jambukeswarar temple...) I've created redirections. I believe that Wikipedia should contain info on all these temples as these are all 1000 year old temples of significant value to Hinduism. And, I'm slowly trying to get these into colloboration modes, starting with the most important one, Tirupathy. [[User:Balajiviswanathan|Balajiviswanathan]] 19:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
265639 +++$+++ Balajiviswanathan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265636 +++$+++ 265638 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163646360E09 +++$+++ Basically, I'm now getting irritated by your repeated messages. I've never said these are non-Wikipedia projects. I'm also not stopping colloboration and indeed trying to get more people involved in the process and slowly trying to get them into WP India WikiProject Hinduism projects. I've moved them appropriately, as many of them were abandoned months back. If someone had been working on them, I would surely try to revert it back. Most of these were stubs and there are no discussions on them. If you have any questions about an article, point them directly.   +++$+++ ::Basically, I'm now getting irritated by your repeated messages. I've never said these are non-Wikipedia projects. I'm also not stopping colloboration and indeed trying to get more people involved in the process and slowly trying to get them into WP India WikiProject Hinduism projects. I've moved them appropriately, as many of them were abandoned months back. If someone had been working on them, I would surely try to revert it back. Most of these were stubs and there are no discussions on them. If you have any questions about an article, point them directly.  [[User:Balajiviswanathan|Balajiviswanathan]] 19:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

3494 +++$+++ Benwing +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-20 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.308557100E09 +++$+++ It is still a redlink for you?  I see the content.  +++$+++ It is still a redlink for you?  I see the content. [[User:Benwing|Benwing]] ([[User talk:Benwing|talk]]) 01:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
3495 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3494 +++$+++ 3494 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.308558480E09 +++$+++ it's good now!  +++$+++ :it's good now! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 01:28, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

527783 +++$+++ GentlemanGhost +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527783 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-06 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.181172180E09 +++$+++ However, I am concerned about the lack of notification. As near as I can tell, there was no notification within the affected article [[Hulk (comics)]] or its talk page about the image's non-compliance. Although this is not required, it seems to be common practice. Had the watchers of this page been notified, I am sure that someone would have written a decent fair use rationale. Is there any way to find out who tagged the image with the fair use warning? I would like to ask them (politely, of course) to put a note on the article's talk page or to use {{[[Template:speedy-image-c|speedy-image-c]]}} next time. -- +++$+++ However, I am concerned about the lack of notification. As near as I can tell, there was no notification within the affected article [[Hulk (comics)]] or its talk page about the image's non-compliance. Although this is not required, it seems to be common practice. Had the watchers of this page been notified, I am sure that someone would have written a decent fair use rationale. Is there any way to find out who tagged the image with the fair use warning? I would like to ask them (politely, of course) to put a note on the article's talk page or to use {{[[Template:speedy-image-c|speedy-image-c]]}} next time. --[[User:GentlemanGhost|GentlemanGhost]] 16:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
527784 +++$+++ GentlemanGhost +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527783 +++$+++ 527783 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.181179740E09 +++$+++ OK, now that the image has been restored, I've determined that there were no notifications made at all: not to the uploader, not to the editors who uploaded new or modified versions of the image, and not to the target article. So, I have made a request (politely, I think) on pd_THOR's [[User talk:Pd THOR|talk page]] to notify people in the future. -- +++$+++ :OK, now that the image has been restored, I've determined that there were no notifications made at all: not to the uploader, not to the editors who uploaded new or modified versions of the image, and not to the target article. So, I have made a request (politely, I think) on pd_THOR's [[User talk:Pd THOR|talk page]] to notify people in the future. --[[User:GentlemanGhost|GentlemanGhost]] 18:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

3496 +++$+++ Phagopsych +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-25 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.309027620E09 +++$+++ This kind of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lovari&diff=prev&oldid=434557507 comments] are not OK. It was clearly not vandalism but a random editor not knowing how to create a new article and a disambiguation page. You have been around for a while and should know better than that. I have doubts myself that this Lovari character is notable enough to deserve its own article but this still does not make it \"vandalism\". Thanks, -- +++$+++ This kind of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lovari&diff=prev&oldid=434557507 comments] are not OK. It was clearly not vandalism but a random editor not knowing how to create a new article and a disambiguation page. You have been around for a while and should know better than that. I have doubts myself that this Lovari character is notable enough to deserve its own article but this still does not make it "vandalism". Thanks, --[[User:Phagopsych|Phagopsych]] ([[User talk:Phagopsych|talk]]) 11:47, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
3497 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3496 +++$+++ 3496 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.309028280E09 +++$+++ Perhaps it would pay to check the history a little bit more carefully before chiding a regular editor over a spat with some IP nutter, at least if we want to keep the regulars moderately happy.  +++$+++ :Perhaps it would pay to check the history a little bit more carefully before chiding a regular editor over a spat with some IP nutter, at least if we want to keep the regulars moderately happy. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 11:58, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
3498 +++$+++ Phagopsych +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3496 +++$+++ 3497 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309042440E09 +++$+++ OK, I understand. Have you considered asking for semi-protection? Thanks, -- +++$+++ ::OK, I understand. Have you considered asking for semi-protection? Thanks, --[[User:Phagopsych|Phagopsych]] ([[User talk:Phagopsych|talk]]) 15:54, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
3499 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3496 +++$+++ 3498 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.309044480E09 +++$+++ Nah, it never really works. Most semi-protects come with a time-limit. Every now and then someone semi-protects [[Ignatius of Loyola]] and we have a couple of weeks peace, then it's back to vandal central. Until Wikipedia bars IP editing, not much hope - you'd be forever pestering an admin over a semi-protect and on that page, it's annoying but relatively low-level.  +++$+++ :::Nah, it never really works. Most semi-protects come with a time-limit. Every now and then someone semi-protects [[Ignatius of Loyola]] and we have a couple of weeks peace, then it's back to vandal central. Until Wikipedia bars IP editing, not much hope - you'd be forever pestering an admin over a semi-protect and on that page, it's annoying but relatively low-level. [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 16:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

265642 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.163671620E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse,  I think the two articles really are duplicates.  There is a village by the falls, but it is small.  If it is notable enough to have its own article, there are many other villages that would also deserve there own articles.  I have refrained from adding articles about small villages because it seemed to me somewhat of \"fancruft\" or \"vanity\" and probably would not be considered notable by a large number of editors.  (On the other hand, in my mind they are more important than Pokemon characters -- but then who am I to say so?)  But getting back to Sivasamudram, I think if you want the article to have the name \"Falls\" in it, you should just merge the two into the \"Falls\" article and leave the other as a redirect (so it isn't recreated).  That is my opinion, but I am always willing to listen to alternative views.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Hi Mattisse,  I think the two articles really are duplicates.  There is a village by the falls, but it is small.  If it is notable enough to have its own article, there are many other villages that would also deserve there own articles.  I have refrained from adding articles about small villages because it seemed to me somewhat of "fancruft" or "vanity" and probably would not be considered notable by a large number of editors.  (On the other hand, in my mind they are more important than Pokemon characters -- but then who am I to say so?)  But getting back to Sivasamudram, I think if you want the article to have the name "Falls" in it, you should just merge the two into the "Falls" article and leave the other as a redirect (so it isn't recreated).  That is my opinion, but I am always willing to listen to alternative views.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 02:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265643 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265642 +++$+++ 265642 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.163678220E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I hope you are not angry with me.  I merged [[Brihadeeswarar Temple]] and [[Brihadeshvara Temple]] because they were both about the same temple.  (Both names are recognizable to Indians.)  If the article is in poor shape, that is my fault, because I'm not that great at writing articles.  Your version stated that the temple was at Talakaveri, and so I was skeptical of it's accuracy.  That is why I merged into the original article.  I didn't care about the name, but only that there not be two articles about the same subject with almost identical names.  It was only after I made the merge that I noticed comments from Hanuman Das and contacted him.  I feel the same about Sivasumadram articles.  I don't care about the name, but there shouldn't be two articles about the same thing.  One should be a redirect to the other, and no useful information should be lost.  I hope this helps to explain.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :Hi Mattisse, I hope you are not angry with me.  I merged [[Brihadeeswarar Temple]] and [[Brihadeshvara Temple]] because they were both about the same temple.  (Both names are recognizable to Indians.)  If the article is in poor shape, that is my fault, because I'm not that great at writing articles.  Your version stated that the temple was at Talakaveri, and so I was skeptical of it's accuracy.  That is why I merged into the original article.  I didn't care about the name, but only that there not be two articles about the same subject with almost identical names.  It was only after I made the merge that I noticed comments from Hanuman Das and contacted him.  I feel the same about Sivasumadram articles.  I don't care about the name, but there shouldn't be two articles about the same thing.  One should be a redirect to the other, and no useful information should be lost.  I hope this helps to explain.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 03:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265644 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265642 +++$+++ 265643 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.163708280E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I believe you have made a great many good contributions to India related articles.  I think you certainly do a better job of organizing an article and making it readable than myself.  However, if you are frustrated with working on India related articles, and wish to stop for awhile I understand.  I do believe, though, that you are misunderstanding my position.  Do you agree that it is not good to have two articles on the same subject with different article names?  What would be your solution to this problem?  You do understand that I do not mind if the name is one thing or the name is another, don't you?  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Hi Mattisse, I believe you have made a great many good contributions to India related articles.  I think you certainly do a better job of organizing an article and making it readable than myself.  However, if you are frustrated with working on India related articles, and wish to stop for awhile I understand.  I do believe, though, that you are misunderstanding my position.  Do you agree that it is not good to have two articles on the same subject with different article names?  What would be your solution to this problem?  You do understand that I do not mind if the name is one thing or the name is another, don't you?  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 12:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265645 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265642 +++$+++ 265644 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.163709000E09 +++$+++ You write \"I agree with his method of discussing it with others and not acting abitrarily and alone. \"  To what are you referring?  -- +++$+++ :::You write "I agree with his method of discussing it with others and not acting abitrarily and alone. "  To what are you referring?  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 12:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265646 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265642 +++$+++ 265645 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.163712120E09 +++$+++ To what do I refer? I refer to [[User:Dineshkannambadi]]'s using the Discussion page of   [[Sivasamudram Falls]] to communicate, and to the fact that he takes it upon himself to sent messages to someone like me out of courtesy to apprise me of proposed changes on articles I have been involved with,  soliciting feedback first, before he makes changes.  +++$+++ ::::To what do I refer? I refer to [[User:Dineshkannambadi]]'s using the Discussion page of   [[Sivasamudram Falls]] to communicate, and to the fact that he takes it upon himself to sent messages to someone like me out of courtesy to apprise me of proposed changes on articles I have been involved with,  soliciting feedback first, before he makes changes. [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 13:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

527789 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-07 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.181269380E09 +++$+++ Geeky joke, I know, but I think your username is unique. ''' +++$+++ Geeky joke, I know, but I think your username is unique. '''[[User:Sceptre|Will]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 19:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
527790 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527789 +++$+++ 527789 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.181271300E09 +++$+++ You know, it could be ''[[i (number)|i]]'' ;) ''' +++$+++ :You know, it could be ''[[i (number)|i]]'' ;) '''[[User:Sceptre|Will]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 19:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

3502 +++$+++ RashersTierney +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.311233820E09 +++$+++ Wouldn't take this editors comments too much to heart. They have a brief opportunity to learn how to conduct themselves constructively from the 'welcome links' I posted at their User Talk, but recent posts by them at [[Talk:Romani people]] appear deliberately provocative if not disingenuous. Unless they show a radical improvement in interactions with other eds. then their Wiki career will be short indeed. Best.  +++$+++ Wouldn't take this editors comments too much to heart. They have a brief opportunity to learn how to conduct themselves constructively from the 'welcome links' I posted at their User Talk, but recent posts by them at [[Talk:Romani people]] appear deliberately provocative if not disingenuous. Unless they show a radical improvement in interactions with other eds. then their Wiki career will be short indeed. Best. [[User:RashersTierney|RashersTierney]] ([[User talk:RashersTierney|talk]]) 00:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
3503 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3502 +++$+++ 3502 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.311236220E09 +++$+++ But thank you for your note, much appreciated!  +++$+++ :But thank you for your note, much appreciated! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 01:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

265647 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.163713560E09 +++$+++ Yes, that is a good way to proceed.  However, I am trying to understand what is going on.  I asked you whether you agreed that it is not good to have two articles on the same subject with different article names, what would be your solution to this problem, and whether you understood that I do not mind what name is used.  I didn't get the point of your answer.  I know it is sometimes frustrating to try to communicate, when communication does not seem to be working.  So, if you would like to take a break that is fine.  However, if you would like to continue, we could either go back to the questions I asked above (about two articles on the same topic), or perhaps you could help me to understand the point you would like to make regarding acting arbitrarily and alone.  I feel bad that this seems to be difficult.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Yes, that is a good way to proceed.  However, I am trying to understand what is going on.  I asked you whether you agreed that it is not good to have two articles on the same subject with different article names, what would be your solution to this problem, and whether you understood that I do not mind what name is used.  I didn't get the point of your answer.  I know it is sometimes frustrating to try to communicate, when communication does not seem to be working.  So, if you would like to take a break that is fine.  However, if you would like to continue, we could either go back to the questions I asked above (about two articles on the same topic), or perhaps you could help me to understand the point you would like to make regarding acting arbitrarily and alone.  I feel bad that this seems to be difficult.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 13:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265648 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.163716860E09 +++$+++ Again, I agree with Dineshkannambadi, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=87007572&oldid=86883510] This was his response (to my response) to a proposal he had made and discussed with me and others over this very issue you are asking me about now. If you want, I will try to layout what he is saying, but he says it better than I would. Maybe you would explain why, if you don't care what name is used, your choice is 999's, the name less recognized and rather incorrect according to Dineshkannambadi, who looked into the matter? 999 had already wiped out one of my just created articles maybe 10 minutes after I created it and a few minutes before the incident on the Falls merge occured, and I am guessing now that you were involved in that also. (I thought I was going crazy - at the time I couldn't figure out what was happening.) I'm not accusing you of being against me because I know that is not true. But my opinion, since you are asking for it, is that incident is an example of sloppy  behavior (not fully checking things out) and such incidents contribute greatly to the bad feeling at Wikipedia. (Plus, and this really bothers me, 999 and  Hanuman Das were able to use you to harass me - I know it was unwitting on your part. Not fully checking thing out opens you up to this. And I wonder now why you would choose Hanuman Das as the ultimate arbitrator on the temple issue. He is a neopagan from Texas and knows nothing about temples in India.   +++$+++ ::Again, I agree with Dineshkannambadi, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=87007572&oldid=86883510] This was his response (to my response) to a proposal he had made and discussed with me and others over this very issue you are asking me about now. If you want, I will try to layout what he is saying, but he says it better than I would. Maybe you would explain why, if you don't care what name is used, your choice is 999's, the name less recognized and rather incorrect according to Dineshkannambadi, who looked into the matter? 999 had already wiped out one of my just created articles maybe 10 minutes after I created it and a few minutes before the incident on the Falls merge occured, and I am guessing now that you were involved in that also. (I thought I was going crazy - at the time I couldn't figure out what was happening.) I'm not accusing you of being against me because I know that is not true. But my opinion, since you are asking for it, is that incident is an example of sloppy  behavior (not fully checking things out) and such incidents contribute greatly to the bad feeling at Wikipedia. (Plus, and this really bothers me, 999 and  Hanuman Das were able to use you to harass me - I know it was unwitting on your part. Not fully checking thing out opens you up to this. And I wonder now why you would choose Hanuman Das as the ultimate arbitrator on the temple issue. He is a neopagan from Texas and knows nothing about temples in India.  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 14:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265649 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265647 +++$+++ 265647 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.163718420E09 +++$+++ You say that Hanuman Das or 999 were able to use me to harass you, that I did not fully check things out, was sloppy etc.  What did I do that you think I ought not to have done?  That is something that I am trying to understand.  Please help me in this.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :You say that Hanuman Das or 999 were able to use me to harass you, that I did not fully check things out, was sloppy etc.  What did I do that you think I ought not to have done?  That is something that I am trying to understand.  Please help me in this.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 15:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265650 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.163730420E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265651 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Would you be adverse to taking the merge off Sivasamudram Falls? If you look at the edit history you will see the merge was slapped on there by User:999 within minutes of my creation of the article -- 6 minutes to be exact -- back in the days when he was stalking me and able to make my life miserable. Mattisse(talk) 23:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :::::Would you be adverse to taking the merge off Sivasamudram Falls? If you look at the edit history you will see the merge was slapped on there by User:999 within minutes of my creation of the article -- 6 minutes to be exact -- back in the days when he was stalking me and able to make my life miserable. Mattisse(talk) 23:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
265652 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.163737740E09 +++$+++ On the other hand, '''if''' there are plans to write an article about the village which isn't essentially about the waterfalls, for example if it were to discuss temples in the village, then I would not object to separate articles.  -- +++$+++ ::::On the other hand, '''if''' there are plans to write an article about the village which isn't essentially about the waterfalls, for example if it were to discuss temples in the village, then I would not object to separate articles.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 20:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

3504 +++$+++ RashersTierney +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3504 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312570560E09 +++$+++ Well spotted. I thought that issue was well and truly put to bed. Best.  +++$+++ Well spotted. I thought that issue was well and truly put to bed. Best. [[User:RashersTierney|RashersTierney]] ([[User talk:RashersTierney|talk]]) 11:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
3505 +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ Akerbeltz +++$+++ 3504 +++$+++ 3504 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.312573680E09 +++$+++ LOL you're welcome - I've come to realise nothing on Wikipedia is ever well and truly put to bed, there's always a new eager beaver somehwere!  +++$+++ :LOL you're welcome - I've come to realise nothing on Wikipedia is ever well and truly put to bed, there's always a new eager beaver somehwere! [[User:Akerbeltz|Akerbeltz]] ([[User talk:Akerbeltz#top|talk]]) 12:48, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

527794 +++$+++ N +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-08 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.181292180E09 +++$+++ Um, deleting the fair use tags from what had been properly tagged images and then saying they had no license seems unfair. - +++$+++ Um, deleting the fair use tags from what had been properly tagged images and then saying they had no license seems unfair. -[[User:N|N]] 01:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
527795 +++$+++ N +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527794 +++$+++ 527794 +++$+++ 2007-06-08 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.181292840E09 +++$+++ I disagree with your reasoning. I have posted at [[WP:ANI#Another_bot_mistagging_fair_use_images]]. Cheers. - +++$+++ *I disagree with your reasoning. I have posted at [[WP:ANI#Another_bot_mistagging_fair_use_images]]. Cheers. -[[User:N|N]] 01:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

527796 +++$+++ Brandon Dilbeck +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527796 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-08 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.181294100E09 +++$+++ I must say that I am disappointed with the way [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion\/Log\/2007 May 31#Pokemon copyright templates|this TfD discussion]] was run.  I'm almost certain that no attempt at notifying [[WP:PCP|the appropriate project page]] about the discussion was made.  Now, you're removing copyright tags from those images; those images are now in ''worse shape'' than they were in before you deleted all the templates.  I must say I am suprised to have seen this happen.  I think the only appropriate course to take right now is to restore those templates and have a do-over TfD, and this time to let [[WP:PCP#Participants|the relevant people]] in on the discussion (by posting on the project's talk page or noticeboard about the discussion).  -- +++$+++ I must say that I am disappointed with the way [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 May 31#Pokemon copyright templates|this TfD discussion]] was run.  I'm almost certain that no attempt at notifying [[WP:PCP|the appropriate project page]] about the discussion was made.  Now, you're removing copyright tags from those images; those images are now in ''worse shape'' than they were in before you deleted all the templates.  I must say I am suprised to have seen this happen.  I think the only appropriate course to take right now is to restore those templates and have a do-over TfD, and this time to let [[WP:PCP#Participants|the relevant people]] in on the discussion (by posting on the project's talk page or noticeboard about the discussion).  --[[User:Brandon Dilbeck|Brandon Dilbeck]] 02:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
527797 +++$+++ Jeske Couriano +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527796 +++$+++ 527796 +++$+++ 2007-06-08 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.181294400E09 +++$+++ We weren't even notified, period.  The only notice we got was not more than one hour ago, when [[User:Amarkov]] reported that all the image tags had been deleted. -'' +++$+++ :We weren't even notified, period.  The only notice we got was not more than one hour ago, when [[User:Amarkov]] reported that all the image tags had been deleted. -''[[User:Jeske Couriano|Jeske]]'' <sup><small>(<font color="0000FF">[[User talk:Jeske Couriano|v^_^v]]</font>)</small></sup> 02:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

3510 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-22 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.295703780E09 +++$+++ Any chance we'll be seeing articles from you again? Looks like you've been busy based on minimal edits the past year. [[User:Wizardman|<span style=\"color:#030\">'''''Wizardman'''''<\/span>]] <sub> +++$+++ Any chance we'll be seeing articles from you again? Looks like you've been busy based on minimal edits the past year. [[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#030">'''''Wizardman'''''</span>]] <sub>[[User:Wizardman/Operation Big Bear|<span style="color:#600">Operation Big Bear</span>]]</sub> 05:43, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
3511 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3510 +++$+++ 3510 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.296646080E09 +++$+++ Good luck with that, glad to see you're back. I actually run the topics process now so you shouldn't have any further problems with it, lol. [[User:Wizardman|<span style=\"color:#030\">'''''Wizardman'''''<\/span>]] <sub> +++$+++ :Good luck with that, glad to see you're back. I actually run the topics process now so you shouldn't have any further problems with it, lol. [[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#030">'''''Wizardman'''''</span>]] <sub>[[User:Wizardman/Operation Big Bear|<span style="color:#600">Operation Big Bear</span>]]</sub> 03:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

3512 +++$+++ SCS100 +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3512 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-01 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.296633120E09 +++$+++ For the record, I am the other main author of the article, so I hope you don't mind my input as well. Thanks for the review, your comments look extremely engaging.  +++$+++ For the record, I am the other main author of the article, so I hope you don't mind my input as well. Thanks for the review, your comments look extremely engaging. [[User:SCS100|SCS100]] ([[User talk:SCS100|talk]]) 23:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
3513 +++$+++  +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3512 +++$+++ 3512 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.296655560E09 +++$+++ I apologize for jumping in your review, but I do think the article should mention the All-star game appearances by the players.  I don't know what you think about this issue.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ :I apologize for jumping in your review, but I do think the article should mention the All-star game appearances by the players.  I don't know what you think about this issue.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 06:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
3514 +++$+++  +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3512 +++$+++ 3513 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.296655920E09 +++$+++ Basically, I added suggestions because of my knowledge of Michigan football, but I did not review it myself because of how much Michigan content I create, which makes me impartial.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ ::Basically, I added suggestions because of my knowledge of Michigan football, but I did not review it myself because of how much Michigan content I create, which makes me impartial.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 06:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
3515 +++$+++  +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3512 +++$+++ 3514 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 06:16:00 +++$+++ 1.296656160E09 +++$+++ I was also the primary GAC editor of the 2009 article.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ :::I was also the primary GAC editor of the 2009 article.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 06:16, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
3516 +++$+++ SCS100 +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3512 +++$+++ 3515 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.296659160E09 +++$+++ No problem Tony. The more input we get the better.  +++$+++ ::::No problem Tony. The more input we get the better. [[User:SCS100|SCS100]] ([[User talk:SCS100|talk]]) 07:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

481183 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-27 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.156729860E09 +++$+++ I'm just saying that 90 percent of the people who read that are not going to get the picture of how strong the storm really was, because most of them are used to 1 min mean, which makes more sense anyway. I've been to the websites of NHC, CHPC, JTWC, JMA, PASAGA and AMA (Australian Meteorological Agency) and they all use 1 min-mean. AMA uses both. I think India and RSMC Mauritius. Are the only ones I've heard of using 10 min mean exclusively and I'm not even sure about them. It's ridiculous to use one measurement when 90 percent of your audience is using something else. -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ I'm just saying that 90 percent of the people who read that are not going to get the picture of how strong the storm really was, because most of them are used to 1 min mean, which makes more sense anyway. I've been to the websites of NHC, CHPC, JTWC, JMA, PASAGA and AMA (Australian Meteorological Agency) and they all use 1 min-mean. AMA uses both. I think India and RSMC Mauritius. Are the only ones I've heard of using 10 min mean exclusively and I'm not even sure about them. It's ridiculous to use one measurement when 90 percent of your audience is using something else. -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]] <small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 18:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
481184 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481183 +++$+++ 481183 +++$+++ 2006-08-28 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.156763520E09 +++$+++ In your haste to prove me wrong, you overlook the fact that 90 percent of the people who read this, the ''English'' version of the page, are American and know nothing other than 1 min mean. You want to split hairs, fine, we can split hairs 'till the cows come home. That's not going to change the fact that the vast majority of the people getting information from these pages know, grew up with and live by 1 min mean. They would look at that 105 kt figure for Saomai and say, \"Oh, just a Cat 3.\" Ennh! Try a Cat 5. This kind of confusion is definately aggrivating and could be dangerous should anyone in the way of these things get the wrong impression, say an American tourist on vacation. He thinks it's a Cat 1 and he's safe but it's a Cat 3 and he's killed in the storm. It sounds over-fretfull but these are the things people around here have to think about. These things matter. -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ :In your haste to prove me wrong, you overlook the fact that 90 percent of the people who read this, the ''English'' version of the page, are American and know nothing other than 1 min mean. You want to split hairs, fine, we can split hairs 'till the cows come home. That's not going to change the fact that the vast majority of the people getting information from these pages know, grew up with and live by 1 min mean. They would look at that 105 kt figure for Saomai and say, "Oh, just a Cat 3." Ennh! Try a Cat 5. This kind of confusion is definately aggrivating and could be dangerous should anyone in the way of these things get the wrong impression, say an American tourist on vacation. He thinks it's a Cat 1 and he's safe but it's a Cat 3 and he's killed in the storm. It sounds over-fretfull but these are the things people around here have to think about. These things matter. -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]] <small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 04:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
481185 +++$+++ E. Brown +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481183 +++$+++ 481184 +++$+++ 2006-08-28 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.156825260E09 +++$+++ This is ridiculous. How am I being biased? I thought an encyclopedia was supposed to be informative, but apparently I'm just a stupid user who thinks Americans are better than everyone else (*gag*). You want it your way, fine have it your way. What the hell am I wasting my time for anyway? Is Wikipedia supposed to be the place where we write down info that nobody understands? This version of the encyclopedia is in English. Why would the vast majority of Asians go to the version of a website written in a language they don't undersand? If I was looking for info, I wouldn't go to the Spanish Wikipedia to look for it. We're working on the English page and the people who are reading that page are people who speak English right? So why are we putting up statistics that only Asian people are familiar with? Sounds to me like you guys are the ones being biased, not me. I don't know why you guys are getting so huffy about this, it's not like I'm saying, \"Asians are stupid, the American way is better.\" Our audience speaks English, so we should put up statistics that those people can understand. It's not a matter of bias, it's a matter of common sense: '''If I was giving a lecture to an audience of English-speakers, I wouldn't give the lecture in Chinese, would I?''' So instead of assuming that I'm out to dis non-Americans, why don't you actually read what I have to say. -- <font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"gold\">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|\xa7]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"#000000\">[[Special:Emailuser\/E._Brown|E]]<\/font><font size=\"2\" face=\"Helvetica\" color=\"FF0000\"> +++$+++ ::This is ridiculous. How am I being biased? I thought an encyclopedia was supposed to be informative, but apparently I'm just a stupid user who thinks Americans are better than everyone else (*gag*). You want it your way, fine have it your way. What the hell am I wasting my time for anyway? Is Wikipedia supposed to be the place where we write down info that nobody understands? This version of the encyclopedia is in English. Why would the vast majority of Asians go to the version of a website written in a language they don't undersand? If I was looking for info, I wouldn't go to the Spanish Wikipedia to look for it. We're working on the English page and the people who are reading that page are people who speak English right? So why are we putting up statistics that only Asian people are familiar with? Sounds to me like you guys are the ones being biased, not me. I don't know why you guys are getting so huffy about this, it's not like I'm saying, "Asians are stupid, the American way is better." Our audience speaks English, so we should put up statistics that those people can understand. It's not a matter of bias, it's a matter of common sense: '''If I was giving a lecture to an audience of English-speakers, I wouldn't give the lecture in Chinese, would I?''' So instead of assuming that I'm out to dis non-Americans, why don't you actually read what I have to say. -- <font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="gold">[[List of Atlantic hurricane seasons|§]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[User talk: E. Brown|Hurricane]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="#000000">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown|E]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica" color="FF0000">[[User:E. Brown|RIC]]</font><font size="2" face="Helvetica">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones|§]] <small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown|archive]]''</small></font> 21:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

3517 +++$+++ SCS100 +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-02 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.296700560E09 +++$+++ I believe that I have fixed everything you asked. Let me know if there is anything else that needs to be fixed. Thanks again for the review.  +++$+++ I believe that I have fixed everything you asked. Let me know if there is anything else that needs to be fixed. Thanks again for the review. [[User:SCS100|SCS100]] ([[User talk:SCS100|talk]]) 18:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
3518 +++$+++ SCS100 +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3517 +++$+++ 3517 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.296717180E09 +++$+++ Fixed everything that Tony mentioned.  +++$+++ *Fixed everything that Tony mentioned. [[User:SCS100|SCS100]] ([[User talk:SCS100|talk]]) 23:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

265664 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265664 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-05 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.162724400E09 +++$+++ Shall I maintain the Chennakesava Temple page as such and expand on that or shall we merge it with Belur page and then elaborate on all shrines in the complex, emphasising on Chennakesava as its the center piece, along with the Gopura, Temple tank etc. The same issue with Hoysalesvara Temple. Halebidu has many shrines including Kedareswara temple and two Jain Basadi's as well. Focussing only on Hoysalesvara gets others lost to the reader and we should probably include all shrines into Halebidu page eventually. This strategy helps us to cover multiple temples\/monuments in one page for a \"temple town\" while giving the reader a brief idea of the locality, town , trade, agriculture etc as we keep expanding. +++$+++ Shall I maintain the Chennakesava Temple page as such and expand on that or shall we merge it with Belur page and then elaborate on all shrines in the complex, emphasising on Chennakesava as its the center piece, along with the Gopura, Temple tank etc. The same issue with Hoysalesvara Temple. Halebidu has many shrines including Kedareswara temple and two Jain Basadi's as well. Focussing only on Hoysalesvara gets others lost to the reader and we should probably include all shrines into Halebidu page eventually. This strategy helps us to cover multiple temples/monuments in one page for a "temple town" while giving the reader a brief idea of the locality, town , trade, agriculture etc as we keep expanding.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
265665 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265664 +++$+++ 265664 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.162779540E09 +++$+++ Just create a page for the most important temple and let the others out (which sometimes does not cover the whole picture). Often as in Hoysala temples, the architects were smart enough to create parallel temples, with one acting as a prototype. The Kappe Channigraya temple (commissioned by Queen Shatala devi) to the right of Chennakeshava temple is actually said to be a prototype for the main Chennakeshava temple (built by King Vishnuvardhana). Also leaving out the Tank\/Gopura which was built by Vijayanagar Kings hides the continuity of patronage to the place. This is important to detail out.Your opinions are welcome +++$+++ *Just create a page for the most important temple and let the others out (which sometimes does not cover the whole picture). Often as in Hoysala temples, the architects were smart enough to create parallel temples, with one acting as a prototype. The Kappe Channigraya temple (commissioned by Queen Shatala devi) to the right of Chennakeshava temple is actually said to be a prototype for the main Chennakeshava temple (built by King Vishnuvardhana). Also leaving out the Tank/Gopura which was built by Vijayanagar Kings hides the continuity of patronage to the place. This is important to detail out.Your opinions are welcome[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

3521 +++$+++ Grondemar +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-20 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.298266740E09 +++$+++ Hello and welcome back!  I wanted to tell you that your Virginia Tech bowl game articles and topic were the major reason I started editing Wikipedia in the first place.  I have been working for the past year on creating a Connecticut Huskies bowl game topic similar to your Virginia Tech bowl game one; naturally this topic is far smaller in scale.  I have a bowl game article, [[2010 PapaJohns.com Bowl]], currently nominated at FAC.  This article has gone through two FACs previously but has failed to be promoted, mainly due to prose issues especially associated with the Team selection section.  If you could take a look at the article and provide your feedback, I would greatly appreciate it.  The FAC can be found [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/2010 PapaJohns.com Bowl\/archive3|here]]. <i> +++$+++ Hello and welcome back!  I wanted to tell you that your Virginia Tech bowl game articles and topic were the major reason I started editing Wikipedia in the first place.  I have been working for the past year on creating a Connecticut Huskies bowl game topic similar to your Virginia Tech bowl game one; naturally this topic is far smaller in scale.  I have a bowl game article, [[2010 PapaJohns.com Bowl]], currently nominated at FAC.  This article has gone through two FACs previously but has failed to be promoted, mainly due to prose issues especially associated with the Team selection section.  If you could take a look at the article and provide your feedback, I would greatly appreciate it.  The FAC can be found [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2010 PapaJohns.com Bowl/archive3|here]]. <i>[[User:Grondemar|&ndash;]][[User talk:Grondemar|Grondemar]]</i> 21:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
3522 +++$+++ Grondemar +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3521 +++$+++ 3521 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.298888220E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your detailed comments.  I believe I have addressed all of them; if you could come back and comment I would appreciate it. <i> +++$+++ :Thanks again for your detailed comments.  I believe I have addressed all of them; if you could come back and comment I would appreciate it. <i>[[User:Grondemar|&ndash;]][[User talk:Grondemar|Grondemar]]</i> 02:17, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
3523 +++$+++ Grondemar +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3521 +++$+++ 3522 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.299158220E09 +++$+++ I've gotten through your second round of comments; if you could re-review, I'd appreciate it. <i> +++$+++ ::I've gotten through your second round of comments; if you could re-review, I'd appreciate it. <i>[[User:Grondemar|&ndash;]][[User talk:Grondemar|Grondemar]]</i> 05:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

527811 +++$+++ Aditya Kabir +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-11 06:23:00 +++$+++ 1.181568180E09 +++$+++ Please, let me know where I went wrong. And, if I was not ''completely'' wrong, it is highly preferable to have the image along with the debate back. If I am completely wrong... well, go ahead with your good work. Thanks.  +++$+++ Please, let me know where I went wrong. And, if I was not ''completely'' wrong, it is highly preferable to have the image along with the debate back. If I am completely wrong... well, go ahead with your good work. Thanks. [[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya Kabir]] 06:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
527812 +++$+++ Aditya Kabir +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527811 +++$+++ 527811 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.181569140E09 +++$+++ I was under the impression that if there's critical description on some piece of visual art it is perfectly fair to display that piece of work to go with the description (as was on the Riya Sen article). I also was under the impression that an elaborate description of a work of art may be accompanied by a visual representation of the work in perfect fairness (as was on the Dabboo Ratnani article). And, I was under the impression that at least three editors\/admins somewhat agreed to that point of view. Besides, there are plenty fair use image we are using on WP that has an argument in that line and in perfect accordance with the policies and guidelines. In fact the only problem I detected in the use of the im,age was inadequate sourcing.  +++$+++ :I was under the impression that if there's critical description on some piece of visual art it is perfectly fair to display that piece of work to go with the description (as was on the Riya Sen article). I also was under the impression that an elaborate description of a work of art may be accompanied by a visual representation of the work in perfect fairness (as was on the Dabboo Ratnani article). And, I was under the impression that at least three editors/admins somewhat agreed to that point of view. Besides, there are plenty fair use image we are using on WP that has an argument in that line and in perfect accordance with the policies and guidelines. In fact the only problem I detected in the use of the im,age was inadequate sourcing. [[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya Kabir]] 06:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
527813 +++$+++ Aditya Kabir +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527811 +++$+++ 527812 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.181570580E09 +++$+++ Thanks. You restored not only the image, but also my faith in this tremendous project we call Wikipedia. Thanks again. You made my day (oh, I left a note on the image talk page as well).  +++$+++ ::Thanks. You restored not only the image, but also my faith in this tremendous project we call Wikipedia. Thanks again. You made my day (oh, I left a note on the image talk page as well). [[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya Kabir]] 07:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
527814 +++$+++ Xavier Martín +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527811 +++$+++ 527811 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Can you simply tell me why have you delete my tennis images? Thanks.  +++$+++ *Can you simply tell me why have you delete my tennis images? Thanks. [[User:Xavier Martín|Xavier Martín]] 19:15, June 11 2007 (UTC)

3528 +++$+++ Mobile Snail +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-06 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.302092400E09 +++$+++ Hey there. Just thought I'd let you know I have placed my GA review of the [[2011 Orange Bowl]] which you nominated on hold for the time being. Overall it is a very good article however I think it could use one or two minor additions, one being an image from the game and the other being a reference in the lead somewhere. As you can see both are fairly minor (the image may be hard to get though so I understand if this is not possible). <b><font color=\"brown\"> +++$+++ Hey there. Just thought I'd let you know I have placed my GA review of the [[2011 Orange Bowl]] which you nominated on hold for the time being. Overall it is a very good article however I think it could use one or two minor additions, one being an image from the game and the other being a reference in the lead somewhere. As you can see both are fairly minor (the image may be hard to get though so I understand if this is not possible). <b><font color="brown">[[User:Mobile Snail|Mobile]]</font></b><b><font color="blue">[[User talk:Mobile Snail|Snail]]</font></b> 05:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
3529 +++$+++ Mobile Snail +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3528 +++$+++ 3528 +++$+++ 2011-04-06 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.302146760E09 +++$+++ {{talkback|Mobile Snail}} And, uh... if you'd like to give me some advice at the [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Boone Kirkman\/archive1|Boone Kirkman peer review]], that would be much appreciated :). <b><font color=\"brown\"> +++$+++ :{{talkback|Mobile Snail}} And, uh... if you'd like to give me some advice at the [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Boone Kirkman/archive1|Boone Kirkman peer review]], that would be much appreciated :). <b><font color="brown">[[User:Mobile Snail|Mobile]]</font></b><b><font color="blue">[[User talk:Mobile Snail|Snail]]</font></b> 20:26, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
3530 +++$+++ Mobile Snail +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3528 +++$+++ 3528 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.302163380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the feedback! It is quite hard to find sources online, but I never thought about doing some offline digging. I actually have a mutual friend who personally knows this guy, so maybe I will do some inside digging :) if I can. <b><font color=\"brown\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for the feedback! It is quite hard to find sources online, but I never thought about doing some offline digging. I actually have a mutual friend who personally knows this guy, so maybe I will do some inside digging :) if I can. <b><font color="brown">[[User:Mobile Snail|Mobile]]</font></b><b><font color="blue">[[User talk:Mobile Snail|Snail]]</font></b> 01:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

527817 +++$+++ The Raven's Apprentice +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527817 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-13 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.181746200E09 +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Pok\xe9mon copyright templates}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Pok\xe9mon copyright templates]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <font color=\"#4682B4\">'''The Raven's Apprentice'''<\/font><sup>( +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Pokémon copyright templates}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Pokémon copyright templates]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <font color="#4682B4">'''The Raven's Apprentice'''</font><sup>([[User:The Raven's Apprentice|<font color="#4682B4">'''Profile'''</font>]]|[[User Talk:The Raven's Apprentice|<font color="#4682B4">'''PokéNav'''</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/The Raven's Apprentice|<font color="#4682B4">'''Trainer Card'''</font>]])</sup> 07:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
527818 +++$+++ Thebainer +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527817 +++$+++ 527817 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.181810700E09 +++$+++ Shh, they'll hear you! I am pleased that [[m:mergism|mergism]] is finally becoming popular, especially in the context of biographical articles. Of course if one were to find a source for some young person who has been hiccuping for even longer, then there would be no editorial reason to retain information about this person at all. -- +++$+++ :Shh, they'll hear you! I am pleased that [[m:mergism|mergism]] is finally becoming popular, especially in the context of biographical articles. Of course if one were to find a source for some young person who has been hiccuping for even longer, then there would be no editorial reason to retain information about this person at all. --[[User:Thebainer|bainer]]&nbsp;([[User_talk:Thebainer|talk]]) 01:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

3531 +++$+++ HstryQT +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-08 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.302330060E09 +++$+++ Thank you for adding your comments to the [[Broad Ripple Park Carousel]]. I was glad to see that you have memories of the carousel! I'm currently [[The Children's Museum of Indianapolis]]'s [[WP:GLAM\/TCMI|Wikipedian-in-Residence]] (latest news [http:\/\/blog.childrensmuseum.org\/blog\/childrens-museum-marketing\/whats-that-wikipedian-in-residence-been-up-to here]) and this is one of the projects that I'm most proud of! ... I'm really lucky to have [[User:Ealdgyth]] step up to the plate for me on-Wiki as I've coordinated the back and forth between her and the curators. I thought you'd be glad to see that through the [http:\/\/outreach.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/GLAM\/Wikimedians GLAM initiative] we recently developed a Wikipedia Widget that is now in use on the [http:\/\/www.childrensmuseum.org\/carousel museum's carousel webpage]. We're now working on a QR code to be added to the line\/exhibit so that visitors can read the Wikipedia article (hopefully FA status soon!) while waiting to ride. Thanks again for helping out and checking in!  +++$+++ Thank you for adding your comments to the [[Broad Ripple Park Carousel]]. I was glad to see that you have memories of the carousel! I'm currently [[The Children's Museum of Indianapolis]]'s [[WP:GLAM/TCMI|Wikipedian-in-Residence]] (latest news [http://blog.childrensmuseum.org/blog/childrens-museum-marketing/whats-that-wikipedian-in-residence-been-up-to here]) and this is one of the projects that I'm most proud of! ... I'm really lucky to have [[User:Ealdgyth]] step up to the plate for me on-Wiki as I've coordinated the back and forth between her and the curators. I thought you'd be glad to see that through the [http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Wikimedians GLAM initiative] we recently developed a Wikipedia Widget that is now in use on the [http://www.childrensmuseum.org/carousel museum's carousel webpage]. We're now working on a QR code to be added to the line/exhibit so that visitors can read the Wikipedia article (hopefully FA status soon!) while waiting to ride. Thanks again for helping out and checking in! [[User:HstryQT|HstryQT]] ([[User talk:HstryQT|talk]]) 23:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
3532 +++$+++ HstryQT +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ 3531 +++$+++ 3531 +++$+++ 2011-04-09 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.302378840E09 +++$+++ Wow, thank you so much! I'm just absolutely thrilled to have inspired you to contribute to the Children's Museum! It's really great to come upon Wikipedians who have a history with the museum and to see them excited about the Wikipedia collaboration. Thank you so much! We will be writing a case study specifically about the carousel article, the process of collaborating to get it to FA, and the results. Would you be OK with us including this as one of our (more surprising :) results? Thank you again for sharing your memories! I'll be sure to keep you in the loop with other announcements.  +++$+++ :Wow, thank you so much! I'm just absolutely thrilled to have inspired you to contribute to the Children's Museum! It's really great to come upon Wikipedians who have a history with the museum and to see them excited about the Wikipedia collaboration. Thank you so much! We will be writing a case study specifically about the carousel article, the process of collaborating to get it to FA, and the results. Would you be OK with us including this as one of our (more surprising :) results? Thank you again for sharing your memories! I'll be sure to keep you in the loop with other announcements. [[User:HstryQT|HstryQT]] ([[User talk:HstryQT|talk]]) 12:54, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

265676 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.163110200E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you liked my writing regarding the image mediation.  The reason why I became somewhat disturbed is that I am the person responsible for bringing the mediator to the issue.  It seemed like the right thing to do at the time.  I had hoped that instead of skipping over the arguments and proceeding fairly quickly to attempts at compromise, we would evaluate the arguments in as neutral a fashion as possible.  Of course my impressions are colored by my preconceptions.  However, it is my impression that many of the issues that have been raised have  not received direct responses.  So I was disappointed by the direction in which things were going, even though I was the one who set things in motion.  However, it is inevitable that we make mistakes in judging what we ought to do, and I ought not judge myself to harshly.  So, how is ''your'' day. :-)  -- +++$+++ I'm glad you liked my writing regarding the image mediation.  The reason why I became somewhat disturbed is that I am the person responsible for bringing the mediator to the issue.  It seemed like the right thing to do at the time.  I had hoped that instead of skipping over the arguments and proceeding fairly quickly to attempts at compromise, we would evaluate the arguments in as neutral a fashion as possible.  Of course my impressions are colored by my preconceptions.  However, it is my impression that many of the issues that have been raised have  not received direct responses.  So I was disappointed by the direction in which things were going, even though I was the one who set things in motion.  However, it is inevitable that we make mistakes in judging what we ought to do, and I ought not judge myself to harshly.  So, how is ''your'' day. :-)  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 14:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265677 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265676 +++$+++ 265676 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.163113260E09 +++$+++ I don't think you are being hard headed.  One has to choose where one will expend energy, and if a given effort seems to lack value, there is nothing wrong with avoiding it.  However, if you don't participate in the mediation, the other editors will be able to hold it against you should you wish to continue editting the articles related to starwood.  They will say that you did not particate in estsablishing the consensus, and therefore your edits are disruptive.  It is therefore a tough choice to make whether to participate or not.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :I don't think you are being hard headed.  One has to choose where one will expend energy, and if a given effort seems to lack value, there is nothing wrong with avoiding it.  However, if you don't participate in the mediation, the other editors will be able to hold it against you should you wish to continue editting the articles related to starwood.  They will say that you did not particate in estsablishing the consensus, and therefore your edits are disruptive.  It is therefore a tough choice to make whether to participate or not.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 15:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

527821 +++$+++ Tecmobowl +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527821 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-14 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.181884620E09 +++$+++ I just want this whole thing to stop.  Aside from Irishguys behavior (and thus mine per my involvment), we need to refocus on the content and get personal opinions tossed out.  I have a very clear and well supported stance on the two links being discussed.  Miss Mondegreen does as well.  I cannot say the same for the other parties involved.  Before I notify anyone of this post, I want to give you some time to let this sink in.  It's as bad as it can be.  I will watch this page and hope we can respond here.  My talk page is a haven for spam and bashing and not going to allow us to have a good discussion.  Thanks for your time and I appologize for its length. \/\/ +++$+++ I just want this whole thing to stop.  Aside from Irishguys behavior (and thus mine per my involvment), we need to refocus on the content and get personal opinions tossed out.  I have a very clear and well supported stance on the two links being discussed.  Miss Mondegreen does as well.  I cannot say the same for the other parties involved.  Before I notify anyone of this post, I want to give you some time to let this sink in.  It's as bad as it can be.  I will watch this page and hope we can respond here.  My talk page is a haven for spam and bashing and not going to allow us to have a good discussion.  Thanks for your time and I appologize for its length. //[[User:Tecmobowl|Tecmobowl]] 22:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
527822 +++$+++ Irishguy +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527821 +++$+++ 527821 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.181884860E09 +++$+++ For the record, Tecmobowl doesn't ''know'' the owner of the website. He ''is'' the owner of the website. [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Tecmobowl\u200e]]. He is spamming in violation of [[WP:COI]] and [[WP:EL]]. When he is warned of this, he simply blanks his talk page and continues. He has used numerous usernames, various IPs, and even a TOR node to avoid detection. <font color=\"Green\"> +++$+++ :For the record, Tecmobowl doesn't ''know'' the owner of the website. He ''is'' the owner of the website. [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tecmobowl‎]]. He is spamming in violation of [[WP:COI]] and [[WP:EL]]. When he is warned of this, he simply blanks his talk page and continues. He has used numerous usernames, various IPs, and even a TOR node to avoid detection. <font color="Green">[[User:Irishguy|'''IrishGuy''']]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">[[User talk:Irishguy|''talk'']]</font></sup> 22:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

527823 +++$+++ Anonymous Dissident +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527823 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-15 09:25:00 +++$+++ 1.181924700E09 +++$+++ I'm trying to get my signature just right, when I noticed that the date at the end of your signature is customised (its in italics). Now, I've been looking everywhere to find out how to customise the date which comes out automatically. Do you think you could tell me how to customise the signature date? It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, and regards,  +++$+++ I'm trying to get my signature just right, when I noticed that the date at the end of your signature is customised (its in italics). Now, I've been looking everywhere to find out how to customise the date which comes out automatically. Do you think you could tell me how to customise the signature date? It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, and regards, [[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]] [[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 09:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
527824 +++$+++ Anonymous Dissident +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527823 +++$+++ 527823 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.181926620E09 +++$+++ Thanks alot. I'll do what you said. Thanks again,  +++$+++ :Thanks alot. I'll do what you said. Thanks again, [[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]] [[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 09:57, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

3538 +++$+++ Gurubrahma +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-19 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.132409520E09 +++$+++ Welcome!! -- +++$+++ Welcome!! --[[User:Gurubrahma|Gurubrahma]] 06:12, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
3539 +++$+++ Gurubrahma +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3538 +++$+++ 3538 +++$+++ 2005-11-19 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.132410900E09 +++$+++ The way to reply is to click on my signature and then click on the discussion button - it is called the user talk page. Anyways, don't bother as I have already seen your reply. All the best for your stay on Wikipedia!! -- +++$+++ : The way to reply is to click on my signature and then click on the discussion button - it is called the user talk page. Anyways, don't bother as I have already seen your reply. All the best for your stay on Wikipedia!! --[[User:Gurubrahma|Gurubrahma]] 06:35, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

527827 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527827 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-14 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.181875380E09 +++$+++ Hey, Chad, could you restore Image:Univac-model.jpg, which you speedied?  I never got a chance to see the speedy tag and can add licensing information for this image.  Thanks.  +++$+++ Hey, Chad, could you restore Image:Univac-model.jpg, which you speedied?  I never got a chance to see the speedy tag and can add licensing information for this image.  Thanks. [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] 19:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
527828 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527827 +++$+++ 527827 +++$+++ 2007-06-19 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.182313500E09 +++$+++ I did what I could.  +++$+++ :I did what I could. [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] 21:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

265685 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.163125020E09 +++$+++ I see that this multiple name thing for a place is a big problem. I guess you should contact the guys who have edited the page Shivanasamudra and see if you can get concensus about what the merge to what. Which name is more popular? Locals call it Shivanasamudra, though we tend to call it Shivasamudra\/samudram. See what news paper articles call it (which may again lead to same confusion). I will look today in my KA map and see what the map says. By the way, what are those {{fact}} tags doing on the page you created. +++$+++ I see that this multiple name thing for a place is a big problem. I guess you should contact the guys who have edited the page Shivanasamudra and see if you can get concensus about what the merge to what. Which name is more popular? Locals call it Shivanasamudra, though we tend to call it Shivasamudra/samudram. See what news paper articles call it (which may again lead to same confusion). I will look today in my KA map and see what the map says. By the way, what are those {{fact}} tags doing on the page you created.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265686 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265685 +++$+++ 265685 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.163125560E09 +++$+++ Hi, sorry to break this to you.  See [[Shivanasamudram]].  -- +++$+++ :Hi, sorry to break this to you.  See [[Shivanasamudram]].  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265687 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265685 +++$+++ 265685 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.163125620E09 +++$+++ Oops, I see you are already aware.  Yes, the name thing is unfortunate.  -- +++$+++ :Oops, I see you are already aware.  Yes, the name thing is unfortunate.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265688 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265685 +++$+++ 265687 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.163131980E09 +++$+++ Hi again, in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Karnataka&curid=16880&diff=86781181&oldid=86775772 this page], [[Shivanasamudra]] falls, is the same as the [[Sivasamudram Falls]] that you added.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Hi again, in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karnataka&curid=16880&diff=86781181&oldid=86775772 this page], [[Shivanasamudra]] falls, is the same as the [[Sivasamudram Falls]] that you added.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 20:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265689 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265685 +++$+++ 265688 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.163133600E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm sorry the naming situation is so frustrating.  A minor point.  Dinesh is usually a male name, so I am strongly guessing that [[User:Dineshkannambadi]] is male.  Please, I am not trying to embarrass you, but I thought you should know.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::Hi, I'm sorry the naming situation is so frustrating.  A minor point.  Dinesh is usually a male name, so I am strongly guessing that [[User:Dineshkannambadi]] is male.  Please, I am not trying to embarrass you, but I thought you should know.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 20:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265690 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265685 +++$+++ 265689 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.163134560E09 +++$+++ No, I don't think he would get upset about that.  No need to worry. -- +++$+++ ::::No, I don't think he would get upset about that.  No need to worry. --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 20:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

3542 +++$+++ Frecklefoot +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.181071260E09 +++$+++ I noticed you added [[SlickEdit]] to the [[:Category:Orthodox text editors|Orthodox text editors category]].  What, precisely, is an [[Orthodox text editor]]?  I've never heard of it before.  Was it meant as a joke? &mdash;  +++$+++ I noticed you added [[SlickEdit]] to the [[:Category:Orthodox text editors|Orthodox text editors category]].  What, precisely, is an [[Orthodox text editor]]?  I've never heard of it before.  Was it meant as a joke? &mdash; [[User:Frecklefoot|Frecklefoot]] | [[User talk:Frecklefoot|Talk]] 12:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
3543 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3542 +++$+++ 3542 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.181120160E09 +++$+++ No it's not a joke, although it's kinda funny. Actually i had just created the category and started filling it up with a few members, one of which SlickEdit. But every time i create a category (and these have been very few, hence my difficulties), i read the help and do what it says, but that's not quite enough, so i now just edited it (the category page, not the SlickEdit article) and added a link that explains what this is about. -- +++$+++ :No it's not a joke, although it's kinda funny. Actually i had just created the category and started filling it up with a few members, one of which SlickEdit. But every time i create a category (and these have been very few, hence my difficulties), i read the help and do what it says, but that's not quite enough, so i now just edited it (the category page, not the SlickEdit article) and added a link that explains what this is about. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] 01:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

3544 +++$+++ RossPatterson +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-06 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.181120400E09 +++$+++ Ditto [[XEDIT]] ''et al.''  If you're going to advance this unusual \"Orthodox editor\" idea, I suggest you start by creating the article, not the category.  The category won't last long without an article to back it up.  Good luck with it &mdash; it's an interesting perspective.  +++$+++ Ditto [[XEDIT]] ''et al.''  If you're going to advance this unusual "Orthodox editor" idea, I suggest you start by creating the article, not the category.  The category won't last long without an article to back it up.  Good luck with it &mdash; it's an interesting perspective. [[User:RossPatterson|RossPatterson]] 02:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
3545 +++$+++ Frecklefoot +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3544 +++$+++ 3544 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.181155080E09 +++$+++ The description in the category is simply a link to a definition on the Internet.  I'm sorry, but the idea of \"Orthodox text editors\" seems to be an idea presented by one person, Dr. Nikolai Bezroukov.  Unless it is widely used and known (which it is not), it shouldn't be added as a category to the 'pedia.  Unless you can find further adoption of the term, I suggest you delete the category.  It looks like a [[neologism]] that hasn't caught on.  I agree with [[User:RossPatterson|RossPatterson]], you should create an article before a category. &mdash;  +++$+++ :The description in the category is simply a link to a definition on the Internet.  I'm sorry, but the idea of "Orthodox text editors" seems to be an idea presented by one person, Dr. Nikolai Bezroukov.  Unless it is widely used and known (which it is not), it shouldn't be added as a category to the 'pedia.  Unless you can find further adoption of the term, I suggest you delete the category.  It looks like a [[neologism]] that hasn't caught on.  I agree with [[User:RossPatterson|RossPatterson]], you should create an article before a category. &mdash; [[User:Frecklefoot|Frecklefoot]] | [[User talk:Frecklefoot|Talk]] 11:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
3546 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3544 +++$+++ 3545 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.181226840E09 +++$+++ i recently discovered the term in [[The Hessling Editor]], was intrigued by it, read on it, and thought it might be interesting to create the category (and see what happens: how it develops\/gets populated). i tend to agree with that it appears to be one person's idea; but i \"grew up\" on [[Xedit]] (the VM\/CMS one), and the concept \"talks to me\" (but i am not an expert on text editors). If you find the presence of the category offensive or disruptive or what else, you may want to perform the clean-up (but i thank you for having pointed it out here first). However, if you do, you may also want to clean up the THE article, as well as any other article which carries the expression, for consistency (to save the next enthusiast such as myself the trouble of making a ''faux-pas''). You may next want to \"hunt down\" mentions of \"orthodox file managers\" (same source). Who knows, the contributor ([[User:Kievite]]) who added to [[The Hessling Editor]] (on October 8, 2005) may disagree with the removal and put it back, this time a bit more complete (but i doubt it, since no edits since October 9, 2005). -- +++$+++ ::i recently discovered the term in [[The Hessling Editor]], was intrigued by it, read on it, and thought it might be interesting to create the category (and see what happens: how it develops/gets populated). i tend to agree with that it appears to be one person's idea; but i "grew up" on [[Xedit]] (the VM/CMS one), and the concept "talks to me" (but i am not an expert on text editors). If you find the presence of the category offensive or disruptive or what else, you may want to perform the clean-up (but i thank you for having pointed it out here first). However, if you do, you may also want to clean up the THE article, as well as any other article which carries the expression, for consistency (to save the next enthusiast such as myself the trouble of making a ''faux-pas''). You may next want to "hunt down" mentions of "orthodox file managers" (same source). Who knows, the contributor ([[User:Kievite]]) who added to [[The Hessling Editor]] (on October 8, 2005) may disagree with the removal and put it back, this time a bit more complete (but i doubt it, since no edits since October 9, 2005). --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] 07:34, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

265691 +++$+++ AdelaMae +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265691 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.163136720E09 +++$+++ I noticed the reference to [[WP:EL]] in the edit summaries of your edits removing the links to their official webpages.  WP:EL states, \"An article about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to that entity's official site, if there is one.\"  I would assume that nearly all organizations and persons would publish their own official website - isn't that what makes official websites official?  So I see no justification in WP:EL for removing those links. -  +++$+++ I noticed the reference to [[WP:EL]] in the edit summaries of your edits removing the links to their official webpages.  WP:EL states, "An article about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to that entity's official site, if there is one."  I would assume that nearly all organizations and persons would publish their own official website - isn't that what makes official websites official?  So I see no justification in WP:EL for removing those links. - [[User:AdelaMae|AdelaMa]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]] <sup>([[User_talk:AdelaMae|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/AdelaMae|contribs]])</sup> 21:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265692 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265691 +++$+++ 265691 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.163138640E09 +++$+++ In the case of [[Selena Fox]] I copied that edit summary from  one of the edit summaries of [[User:Ekajati]] because she is thought to be an expert. But maybe I was wrong in doing so, as looking through [[WP:EL]] right now, I don't see it. So maybe she is wrong. In any case, the article has been reverted by [[User:Hanuman Das]] and the link is restored. I will check into it more, but I apologize if I was wrong. In the case of [[Phyllis Curott]] there are no reference citations per [[WP:V]] and [[WP:CITE]]. [[Ralph Bass]] is an example of a referenced article. There are better examples and I will find more if you want. In any case, that article also has been reverted by [[User:Hanuman Das]] and what was there before my edit is now restored. Hope this helps    +++$+++ :In the case of [[Selena Fox]] I copied that edit summary from  one of the edit summaries of [[User:Ekajati]] because she is thought to be an expert. But maybe I was wrong in doing so, as looking through [[WP:EL]] right now, I don't see it. So maybe she is wrong. In any case, the article has been reverted by [[User:Hanuman Das]] and the link is restored. I will check into it more, but I apologize if I was wrong. In the case of [[Phyllis Curott]] there are no reference citations per [[WP:V]] and [[WP:CITE]]. [[Ralph Bass]] is an example of a referenced article. There are better examples and I will find more if you want. In any case, that article also has been reverted by [[User:Hanuman Das]] and what was there before my edit is now restored. Hope this helps   [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 22:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265693 +++$+++ AdelaMae +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265691 +++$+++ 265692 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.163162460E09 +++$+++ I knew the links had been reverted, but I wanted to make sure that you got some explanation for it.  You're right that the [[Phyllis Curott]] article needs verification, and I've added it to the list on [[WP:WPN|WikiProject Neopaganism]].  -  +++$+++ ::I knew the links had been reverted, but I wanted to make sure that you got some explanation for it.  You're right that the [[Phyllis Curott]] article needs verification, and I've added it to the list on [[WP:WPN|WikiProject Neopaganism]].  - [[User:AdelaMae|AdelaMa]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]] <sup>([[User_talk:AdelaMae|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/AdelaMae|contribs]])</sup> 04:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
265694 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265691 +++$+++ 265693 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.163162760E09 +++$+++ I'm very appreciative of your reply and glad that you seek to improve the article as all work in that direction helps us all at Wikipedia. Thanks!   +++$+++ :::I'm very appreciative of your reply and glad that you seek to improve the article as all work in that direction helps us all at Wikipedia. Thanks!  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 04:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

3548 +++$+++ Wanderer57 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3548 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-08 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.194523020E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ Cheers, [[User:Wanderer57|Wanderer57]] 03:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
3549 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3548 +++$+++ 3548 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.194524460E09 +++$+++ Haha. That's funny, i consider meself Mister frugal, but you beat me on this one. Thanks. -- +++$+++ :Haha. That's funny, i consider meself Mister frugal, but you beat me on this one. Thanks. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] 04:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
3550 +++$+++ Wanderer57 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3548 +++$+++ 3548 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.194590400E09 +++$+++ Does Mireille Mathieu count as one of the \"major ones\"?   +++$+++ :Does Mireille Mathieu count as one of the "major ones"?  [[User:Wanderer57|Wanderer57]] 22:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
3551 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3548 +++$+++ 3550 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.194599640E09 +++$+++ Actually, this question of \"the major ones\" opens up a can of worms (which i then didn't mean to do). Maybe what i meant was to propose that folks add whatever version they want included, without feeling obligated to be exhaustive about it by searching the world over for versions which we've never heard. -- +++$+++ ::Actually, this question of "the major ones" opens up a can of worms (which i then didn't mean to do). Maybe what i meant was to propose that folks add whatever version they want included, without feeling obligated to be exhaustive about it by searching the world over for versions which we've never heard. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] 01:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
3552 +++$+++ Wanderer57 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3548 +++$+++ 3551 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.194603360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::: [[User:Wanderer57|Wanderer57]] 02:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

527838 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527838 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-17 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.182141960E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I was browsing [[:Category:Photographs]] and I noticed that the image had been deleted from [[Child with Toy Hand Grenade in Central Park]]. The deletion log entry is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/delete&page=Image:Childwithhandgrenadedianearbus.jpg here]. I realised that the image should have had licensing information, but from the sound of it, that is an image that could easily be acceptable under fair-use if someone wrote a fair-use rationale. Would you consider undeleting the image, or should I try and find an alternative copy and upload it under fair use?  +++$+++ Hi there. I was browsing [[:Category:Photographs]] and I noticed that the image had been deleted from [[Child with Toy Hand Grenade in Central Park]]. The deletion log entry is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Image:Childwithhandgrenadedianearbus.jpg here]. I realised that the image should have had licensing information, but from the sound of it, that is an image that could easily be acceptable under fair-use if someone wrote a fair-use rationale. Would you consider undeleting the image, or should I try and find an alternative copy and upload it under fair use? [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 21:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
527839 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527838 +++$+++ 527838 +++$+++ 2007-06-17 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.182142020E09 +++$+++ Ditto for the other image from that article. Deletion log is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/delete&page=Image:ChildwithhandgrenadedianearbusCS.jpg here]. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Ditto for the other image from that article. Deletion log is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Image:ChildwithhandgrenadedianearbusCS.jpg here]. Thanks. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 21:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

265695 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.163138100E09 +++$+++ Occassionaly I have good advice for people, but in this situation I'm afraid I don't know what you should do to prepare.  I think your best bet is to ask someone else for advice, perhaps a few someone elses.  I will try to keep your question in mind, and if I have any thoughts I will relay them to you.  Sorry to be of such little help.  And please do not worry about bothering me.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Occassionaly I have good advice for people, but in this situation I'm afraid I don't know what you should do to prepare.  I think your best bet is to ask someone else for advice, perhaps a few someone elses.  I will try to keep your question in mind, and if I have any thoughts I will relay them to you.  Sorry to be of such little help.  And please do not worry about bothering me.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 21:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265696 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265695 +++$+++ 265695 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.163139840E09 +++$+++ There is an admin [[User:Glen S]] that left a friendly note on your page once.  Try him? -- +++$+++ :There is an admin [[User:Glen S]] that left a friendly note on your page once.  Try him? --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265697 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265695 +++$+++ 265695 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.163140080E09 +++$+++ Also you might try to get advice from [[User:Redvers]].  He (I assume it is a he) gave me a barnstar so he must be decent ;-D.  (Only kidding, but I do think he is decent.  -- +++$+++ :Also you might try to get advice from [[User:Redvers]].  He (I assume it is a he) gave me a barnstar so he must be decent ;-D.  (Only kidding, but I do think he is decent.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265698 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265695 +++$+++ 265697 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.163143740E09 +++$+++ It looks as though they are filing a RfC [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Mattisse | here]].  They need to notify you when it is complete, and they need to certify it.  After that, you can respond.  I think once they notify you, you should send messages to Calton, Samir, JzG, and a few others notifying them that a RfC has been  put in place against you, and could they please comment.  -- +++$+++ ::It looks as though they are filing a RfC [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mattisse | here]].  They need to notify you when it is complete, and they need to certify it.  After that, you can respond.  I think once they notify you, you should send messages to Calton, Samir, JzG, and a few others notifying them that a RfC has been  put in place against you, and could they please comment.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265699 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265695 +++$+++ 265697 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.163150340E09 +++$+++ DOn't worry about the RfC its all old news now delt with. They will shoot themselves in the foot with this. Just keep cool. -- +++$+++ ::DOn't worry about the RfC its all old news now delt with. They will shoot themselves in the foot with this. Just keep cool. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 01:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

527840 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527840 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-19 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.182275460E09 +++$+++ Sorry to nag, but I see you are around. I wonder if you have had time to look at this yet? No rush, obviously, but just checking you haven't missed this.  +++$+++ Sorry to nag, but I see you are around. I wonder if you have had time to look at this yet? No rush, obviously, but just checking you haven't missed this. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 10:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
527841 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527840 +++$+++ 527840 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.182372180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for restoring them. I've added fair-use tags and rationales. Would you have time to double-check what I've put is OK. I can't put a source, as I didn't upload the pictures, but I suspect they were taken from the Smithsonian collection (see the image histories), as the previous tag was the now deleted {{tl|Smithsonian}}.  +++$+++ :Thanks for restoring them. I've added fair-use tags and rationales. Would you have time to double-check what I've put is OK. I can't put a source, as I didn't upload the pictures, but I suspect they were taken from the Smithsonian collection (see the image histories), as the previous tag was the now deleted {{tl|Smithsonian}}. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 13:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

3553 +++$+++ 65.163.112.104 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3553 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-09 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.194628740E09 +++$+++ These two have stated that liberals such as Congressman Kucinich are mentally ill, as indicated by [[Michael Savage]]'s book ''[[Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder]]''. Check out the article, and the book.  +++$+++ These two have stated that liberals such as Congressman Kucinich are mentally ill, as indicated by [[Michael Savage]]'s book ''[[Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder]]''. Check out the article, and the book. [[User:65.163.112.104|65.163.112.104]] 09:19, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
3554 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3553 +++$+++ 3553 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.194702060E09 +++$+++ Yeah, riiight. Sounds\/looks stupid. Thankfully, i'm no customer of theirs. -- +++$+++ :Yeah, riiight. Sounds/looks stupid. Thankfully, i'm no customer of theirs. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] 05:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

3557 +++$+++ 82.149.79.21 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3557 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-14 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.208224020E09 +++$+++ I've thought someone has joked there. Which the heck seems at glance a joke, hungary programmers or hungry programmers? Well, I linked it so that nobody like me shouldn't be blocked <del>by like you<\/del>.--[[Special:Contributions\/82.149.79.21|82.149.79.21]] ( +++$+++ I've thought someone has joked there. Which the heck seems at glance a joke, hungary programmers or hungry programmers? Well, I linked it so that nobody like me shouldn't be blocked <del>by like you</del>.--[[Special:Contributions/82.149.79.21|82.149.79.21]] ([[User talk:82.149.79.21|talk]]) 18:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
3558 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3557 +++$+++ 3557 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.208224860E09 +++$+++ OK, next time, ask in the discussion page, rather than directly editing the article. Or better yet, conduct a bit of research first, like google \"lesstif\" \"hungry programmers\". -- +++$+++ :OK, next time, ask in the discussion page, rather than directly editing the article. Or better yet, conduct a bit of research first, like google "lesstif" "hungry programmers". --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 19:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
3559 +++$+++ 82.149.79.21 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3557 +++$+++ 3558 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.208225340E09 +++$+++ ya, seems far better.--[[Special:Contributions\/82.149.79.21|82.149.79.21]] ( +++$+++ ::ya, seems far better.--[[Special:Contributions/82.149.79.21|82.149.79.21]] ([[User talk:82.149.79.21|talk]]) 19:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

605815 +++$+++ Redux +++$+++ Mr. Lefty +++$+++ 605815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.159081320E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge!   +++$+++ Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge!  [[User:Redux|Redux]] 00:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
605816 +++$+++ Steel359 +++$+++ Mr. Lefty +++$+++ 605815 +++$+++ 605815 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.159081560E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure if anyone's told you this yet, but if you don't clear out at least 6 areas of backlog in your first week you get desysopped. Sorry. --  +++$+++ :I'm not sure if anyone's told you this yet, but if you don't clear out at least 6 areas of backlog in your first week you get desysopped. Sorry. -- [[User:Steel359|Steel]] 00:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
605817 +++$+++ Daniel5127 +++$+++ Mr. Lefty +++$+++ 605815 +++$+++ 605816 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.159085340E09 +++$+++ Congratulations for becoming adminship. Fortunately, your successful adminship this time. Anyways, Congratulations.  +++$+++ ::Congratulations for becoming adminship. Fortunately, your successful adminship this time. Anyways, Congratulations. [[User:Daniel5127|<font color="Red">'''Daniel's page'''</font>]]  [[User Talk:Daniel5127|<font color="Red">'''Talk to me'''</font>]] 01:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
605818 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Mr. Lefty +++$+++ 605815 +++$+++ 605817 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.159128420E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="color:red">'''Nish'''</span><span style="color:blue">'''kid'''</span><span style="color:green">'''64'''</span>]] 13:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
605819 +++$+++ Junglecat +++$+++ Mr. Lefty +++$+++ 605815 +++$+++ 605817 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.159255920E09 +++$+++ Pile on! Enjoy this and remember this!  +++$+++ :::Pile on! Enjoy this and remember this! [[User:Junglecat|<font color="green">JungleCat</font>]]  <small>[[User talk:Junglecat|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Junglecat|<font color="blue">contrib</font>]]</small> 00:32, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

265706 +++$+++ Balajiviswanathan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-11 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.163253480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Balajiviswanathan|Balajiviswanathan]] 05:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
265707 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265706 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163253960E09 +++$+++ Write the article in a text editor (or always copy it first to a text editor). I learned the hard way too.   But understand why there can be no copyvio, right?  +++$+++ :::Write the article in a text editor (or always copy it first to a text editor). I learned the hard way too.   But understand why there can be no copyvio, right? [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 06:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

550048 +++$+++ Jsmorse47 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-05 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.157450460E09 +++$+++ The list ([[List_of_cameo_appearances]]) you created is\/was up for deletion.  I want you to know there is a place for it: http:\/\/wikitistics.com .  No one will be able to nominate it for deletion because it fits one simple rule: it's a statistic, list, or figure.  Some people think these websites should encompass the same scope of a book- we don't.  Good luck with your endeavors! +++$+++ The list ([[List_of_cameo_appearances]]) you created is/was up for deletion.  I want you to know there is a place for it: http://wikitistics.com .  No one will be able to nominate it for deletion because it fits one simple rule: it's a statistic, list, or figure.  Some people think these websites should encompass the same scope of a book- we don't.  Good luck with your endeavors![[User:Jsmorse47|Joe]] 03:01, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
550049 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550048 +++$+++ 550048 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.157468160E09 +++$+++ Hm, now, see, I don't really care what happens with that list. I didn't create it, I just removed the stuff from [[Cameo appearance]] to the new page: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Cameo_appearance&diff=41173405&oldid=40934178]. I too don't think that's a usable list so I don't have anything against it being deleted... if you whish, feel free to move it to wikitistics.com. Thanks for the note, anyway. -- +++$+++ : Hm, now, see, I don't really care what happens with that list. I didn't create it, I just removed the stuff from [[Cameo appearance]] to the new page: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cameo_appearance&diff=41173405&oldid=40934178]. I too don't think that's a usable list so I don't have anything against it being deleted... if you whish, feel free to move it to wikitistics.com. Thanks for the note, anyway. --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 07:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

3564 +++$+++ Rp +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-04 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.215199980E09 +++$+++ Thank you for cleaning up my initialisms.  +++$+++ Thank you for cleaning up my initialisms. [[User:Rp|Rp]] ([[User talk:Rp|talk]]) 12:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
3565 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3564 +++$+++ 3564 +++$+++ 2008-07-04 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.215229020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comment, it informs me that apparently i did not err in my choice of wikification. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for your comment, it informs me that apparently i did not err in my choice of wikification. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 20:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

527853 +++$+++ Remember the dot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527853 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-23 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.182587580E09 +++$+++ Hi. Could you please restore [[:Image:Aintitcool.com screenshot.png]]? It wasn't actually orphaned when you deleted it, it was used in the article [[Ain't It Cool News]]. Compare [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ain%27t_It_Cool_News&action=history the history page] to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/delete&page=Image:Aintitcool.com_screenshot.png the deletion log] for proof. \u2014 +++$+++ Hi. Could you please restore [[:Image:Aintitcool.com screenshot.png]]? It wasn't actually orphaned when you deleted it, it was used in the article [[Ain't It Cool News]]. Compare [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ain%27t_It_Cool_News&action=history the history page] to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Image:Aintitcool.com_screenshot.png the deletion log] for proof. —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 01:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
527854 +++$+++ Remember the dot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527853 +++$+++ 527853 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.182587880E09 +++$+++ (replying to [[User talk:Remember the dot#Re: Image:Aintitcool.com screenshot.png|message on my talk page]]) - Thank you! \u2014 +++$+++ :(replying to [[User talk:Remember the dot#Re: Image:Aintitcool.com screenshot.png|message on my talk page]]) - Thank you! —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 01:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

3566 +++$+++ Eric +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-05 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.217990760E09 +++$+++ Salut Jerome- I saw your edit of [[escarpment]], which prompted me to take a look around fr.wp, and I couldn't find an article for the term there. The general term would be ''escarpement,'' right, or maybe ''escarpement de faille''? I wonder if I should try to translate the en one and put it on fr? - +++$+++ Salut Jerome- I saw your edit of [[escarpment]], which prompted me to take a look around fr.wp, and I couldn't find an article for the term there. The general term would be ''escarpement,'' right, or maybe ''escarpement de faille''? I wonder if I should try to translate the en one and put it on fr? -[[User:Eric|Eric]] [[User talk:Eric|<sup>talk</sup>]] 19:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
3567 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3566 +++$+++ 3566 +++$+++ 2008-08-05 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.217994660E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 20:51, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
3568 +++$+++ Eric +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3566 +++$+++ 3567 +++$+++ 2008-08-05 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.217997660E09 +++$+++ H\xe9, your Larousse is better! My p'tit has a much more condensed definition! Ok, I'll wait for a rainy day and put at least a stub over on fr. Merci! - +++$+++ ::Hé, your Larousse is better! My p'tit has a much more condensed definition! Ok, I'll wait for a rainy day and put at least a stub over on fr. Merci! -[[User:Eric|Eric]] [[User talk:Eric|<sup>talk</sup>]] 21:41, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

527855 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-23 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.182591300E09 +++$+++ Since you don't think my rationales are legitimate (subjective on your part), tell me specifically what you think is legitimate so you will stop reverting me.  +++$+++ Since you don't think my rationales are legitimate (subjective on your part), tell me specifically what you think is legitimate so you will stop reverting me. [[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris]] 02:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
527856 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527855 +++$+++ 527855 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.182591600E09 +++$+++ see <s>[[WP:NCC]]<\/s>[[WP:FUC]] and [[WP:FURG]] also note that non-free images can only be used in the mainspace. [[User:Betacommand|Betacommand]] <sup>([[User talk:Betacommand|talk]] \u2022 [[Special:Contributions\/Betacommand|contribs]] \u2022  +++$+++ :see <s>[[WP:NCC]]</s>[[WP:FUC]] and [[WP:FURG]] also note that non-free images can only be used in the mainspace. [[User:Betacommand|Betacommand]] <sup>([[User talk:Betacommand|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Betacommand|contribs]] • [[User:BetacommandBot|Bot]])</sup> 02:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

527858 +++$+++  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527858 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-23 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.182634620E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:122.162.74.22|122.162.74.22]] (Please reply on [[User talk:Shreshth91]])  14:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
527859 +++$+++ 122.162.74.22 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527858 +++$+++ 527858 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.182638040E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much. -- +++$+++ :Thank you very much. --[[User:122.162.74.22|122.162.74.22]] 15:34, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

3572 +++$+++ Kdammers +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3572 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-22 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.237721520E09 +++$+++ When You created the [[Gustaf John Ramstedt|Ramstedt]] article, You apparently used the Finnish \/ Swedish spelling of his first name (GustaF).  I wonder if that is what we should use, since all the English-language references  (e.g., the obit and Krippes - I don't have physical access to the original articles by Ramstedt, so I don't know how his name was spelled in his publications) I have seen to his work use a different spelling (GustaV).  +++$+++ When You created the [[Gustaf John Ramstedt|Ramstedt]] article, You apparently used the Finnish / Swedish spelling of his first name (GustaF).  I wonder if that is what we should use, since all the English-language references  (e.g., the obit and Krippes - I don't have physical access to the original articles by Ramstedt, so I don't know how his name was spelled in his publications) I have seen to his work use a different spelling (GustaV). [[User:Kdammers|Kdammers]] ([[User talk:Kdammers|talk]]) 04:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
3573 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3572 +++$+++ 3572 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.237722120E09 +++$+++ Hmm i don't remember pondering over it, i pbbly simply wrote it as i found it. But now that you bring it up, i can say that i am in favor of using a person's name as (s)he would write it, so i would pbbly prefer if it was left this way. A [[Gustav John Ramstedt]] redirect could be created, and so could a [[Gustav Ramstedt]]. However, i don't maintain that article, so perhaps it's \"yours\" now? -- +++$+++ :Hmm i don't remember pondering over it, i pbbly simply wrote it as i found it. But now that you bring it up, i can say that i am in favor of using a person's name as (s)he would write it, so i would pbbly prefer if it was left this way. A [[Gustav John Ramstedt]] redirect could be created, and so could a [[Gustav Ramstedt]]. However, i don't maintain that article, so perhaps it's "yours" now? --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 04:42, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
3574 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3572 +++$+++ 3572 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.237752000E09 +++$+++ See also [[Gustave Flaubert]]. (I'm French and i prefer it when he is not referred to as Gustav Flaubert). -- +++$+++ :See also [[Gustave Flaubert]]. (I'm French and i prefer it when he is not referred to as Gustav Flaubert). --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 13:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
3575 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3572 +++$+++ 3572 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.237752600E09 +++$+++ Or (and i am sorry i didn't think of it earlier), name it Gustav, with the beginning going such: '''Gustav John Ramstedt''' (in Swedish, '''Gustaf John Ramstedt'''), ... -- +++$+++ :Or (and i am sorry i didn't think of it earlier), name it Gustav, with the beginning going such: '''Gustav John Ramstedt''' (in Swedish, '''Gustaf John Ramstedt'''), ... --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 13:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

3576 +++$+++ Haberg +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-22 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.237785900E09 +++$+++ Thank you for linking [[Bulgarian dances]]. The article [[Musical ensemble]] though does not mention the Bulgarian \"wedding \" style bands, which are on [[Bulgarian music]]. And the article [[Beat (music)]] as it stands, is hard to apply to Bulgarian music, as the metric time unit is too short to be recognized as a \"beat\"; the Harvard Concise dictionary of music says it is real or imagined conductor strokes, which then can be both more (at slow tempo) or fewer (at  hight tempo) than the measurement unit of the meter.  +++$+++ Thank you for linking [[Bulgarian dances]]. The article [[Musical ensemble]] though does not mention the Bulgarian "wedding " style bands, which are on [[Bulgarian music]]. And the article [[Beat (music)]] as it stands, is hard to apply to Bulgarian music, as the metric time unit is too short to be recognized as a "beat"; the Harvard Concise dictionary of music says it is real or imagined conductor strokes, which then can be both more (at slow tempo) or fewer (at  hight tempo) than the measurement unit of the meter. [[User:Haberg|Haberg]] ([[User talk:Haberg|talk]]) 22:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
3577 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3576 +++$+++ 3576 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.237807800E09 +++$+++ You are most welcome, and thanks for the feedback. But, aha!, so now you know to go improve those deficient articles. Or find more suitable ones to link to. Or unlink, then. I just thought it would help, but if it doesn't, then let's undo. But that would be a defeat, no? -- +++$+++ :You are most welcome, and thanks for the feedback. But, aha!, so now you know to go improve those deficient articles. Or find more suitable ones to link to. Or unlink, then. I just thought it would help, but if it doesn't, then let's undo. But that would be a defeat, no? --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 04:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
3578 +++$+++ Haberg +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3576 +++$+++ 3577 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.237839060E09 +++$+++ The best way would to be add those things - I just give somebody the opportunity to do it. With hopes for the future.  +++$+++ ::The best way would to be add those things - I just give somebody the opportunity to do it. With hopes for the future. [[User:Haberg|Haberg]] ([[User talk:Haberg|talk]]) 13:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

3579 +++$+++ Mion +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-25 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.256475660E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for cleaning up, a link for the fact is provided in the history, sorry for intervening. cheers  +++$+++ Hi, thanks for cleaning up, a link for the fact is provided in the history, sorry for intervening. cheers [[User:Mion|Mion]] ([[User talk:Mion|talk]]) 06:01, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
3580 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3579 +++$+++ 3579 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.256479560E09 +++$+++ Well, you could at least have added the ISBN, now that you had found it. -- +++$+++ :Well, you could at least have added the ISBN, now that you had found it. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 07:06, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
3581 +++$+++ Mion +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3579 +++$+++ 3580 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.256481300E09 +++$+++ Sorry, i have no clue how to add the isbn in the way you did :).  +++$+++ ::Sorry, i have no clue how to add the isbn in the way you did :). [[User:Mion|Mion]] ([[User talk:Mion|talk]]) 07:35, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
3582 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3579 +++$+++ 3581 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.256482980E09 +++$+++ OK, so perhaps you're not familiar with the somewhat intricate source templates; but the ref which you put back was written in free format, the ISBN could've been added just the same. -- +++$+++ :::OK, so perhaps you're not familiar with the somewhat intricate source templates; but the ref which you put back was written in free format, the ISBN could've been added just the same. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 08:03, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
3583 +++$+++ Mion +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3579 +++$+++ 3582 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.256483640E09 +++$+++ yes, after the rev i realised that sticking it in the history wasn't the best move.  +++$+++ ::::yes, after the rev i realised that sticking it in the history wasn't the best move. [[User:Mion|Mion]] ([[User talk:Mion|talk]]) 08:14, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
3584 +++$+++ Mion +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3579 +++$+++ 3582 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.256507880E09 +++$+++ But what else could I do, adding a fix to closed sources is not my thing, similar with the branding of Elsevier and  Kluwer Academic Publisherspp in the way it is done now, Members only, Commercial creep into the project. Cheers  +++$+++ ::::But what else could I do, adding a fix to closed sources is not my thing, similar with the branding of Elsevier and  Kluwer Academic Publisherspp in the way it is done now, Members only, Commercial creep into the project. Cheers [[User:Mion|Mion]] ([[User talk:Mion|talk]]) 14:58, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
3585 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3579 +++$+++ 3584 +++$+++ 2009-10-26 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.256545860E09 +++$+++ What you could have done was to add the missing ISBN, so that whomever wishes to check on that ref, or to conduct some further reading on the topic at hand, locate a copy source text easily. Most always there is only one ISBN per published work. Elsevier and Springer Verlag are the publishers of their respective documents. If you have an open source to offer, then by all means replace the refs which i simply formatted, and the ones which i completed, with the more accessible (not-for-a-fee) versions. However, if the solution you find is limited to a paper document, then please leave the links to the abstracts, so that they be accessible at a click of the mouse. -- +++$+++ :::::What you could have done was to add the missing ISBN, so that whomever wishes to check on that ref, or to conduct some further reading on the topic at hand, locate a copy source text easily. Most always there is only one ISBN per published work. Elsevier and Springer Verlag are the publishers of their respective documents. If you have an open source to offer, then by all means replace the refs which i simply formatted, and the ones which i completed, with the more accessible (not-for-a-fee) versions. However, if the solution you find is limited to a paper document, then please leave the links to the abstracts, so that they be accessible at a click of the mouse. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 01:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
3586 +++$+++ Mion +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3579 +++$+++ 3582 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.256508420E09 +++$+++ Maybe we can ask cluebot to auto replace the links with alternative sources from [[open access journal]]s.  +++$+++ ::::Maybe we can ask cluebot to auto replace the links with alternative sources from [[open access journal]]s. [[User:Mion|Mion]] ([[User talk:Mion|talk]]) 15:07, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
3587 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3579 +++$+++ 3586 +++$+++ 2009-10-26 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.256545860E09 +++$+++ OK, i don't particularily know Cluebot. If it can do that, then that sounds rather good. -- +++$+++ :::::OK, i don't particularily know Cluebot. If it can do that, then that sounds rather good. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 01:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
3588 +++$+++ Mion +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3579 +++$+++ 3586 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.256777280E09 +++$+++ I think nobody asked [[User:ClueBot]] yet, anyway keep up the good work. Cheers  +++$+++ :::::I think nobody asked [[User:ClueBot]] yet, anyway keep up the good work. Cheers [[User:Mion|Mion]] ([[User talk:Mion|talk]]) 17:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

527868 +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527868 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-24 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.182737040E09 +++$+++ Hi. Could you please restore Image:Clouds Psyche.jpg? It wasn't actually orphaned when you deleted it. It was used in the article [[Final Fantasy VII]]. Compare [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Final_Fantasy_VII&action=history the history page] to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/delete&page=Image:Clouds_Psyche.jpg the deletion log] for proof. +++$+++ Hi. Could you please restore Image:Clouds Psyche.jpg? It wasn't actually orphaned when you deleted it. It was used in the article [[Final Fantasy VII]]. Compare [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Final_Fantasy_VII&action=history the history page] to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Image:Clouds_Psyche.jpg the deletion log] for proof.[[User:Kazu-kun|Kazu-kun]] 19:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
527869 +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527868 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-24 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.182738540E09 +++$+++ Thanks! +++$+++ ::Thanks![[User:Kazu-kun|Kazu-kun]] 19:29, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

527870 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527870 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-25 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.182803400E09 +++$+++ Hi ^demon; I recommend you don't delete images from here as NowCommons when they are not in a category or article on commons.  I could blame this on you being unaware of that rule, but when the message by my bot says it, that excuse isn't as valid anymore :-) \u2014<span style=\"color: red;\"> +++$+++ Hi ^demon; I recommend you don't delete images from here as NowCommons when they are not in a category or article on commons.  I could blame this on you being unaware of that rule, but when the message by my bot says it, that excuse isn't as valid anymore :-) —<span style="color: red;">[[User:Mets501|M<small>ETS</small>501]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 13:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
527871 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527870 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-25 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.182803700E09 +++$+++ No problem :-) \u2014<span style=\"color: red;\"> +++$+++ ::No problem :-) —<span style="color: red;">[[User:Mets501|M<small>ETS</small>501]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 13:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

265730 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-13 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.163469900E09 +++$+++ I again thank your for your comments which are more flattering than I probably deserve.  We will see how the mediation goes.  I see that a great deal of progress has been made with your communication with Hanuman Das.  That is very good, and I imagine it brings quite  a bit of relief.  Thank you again for your work on dams and rivers etc. I hope you don't mind that I made some adjustments to [[Sivasamudram Falls]] the other day.  Also, there is one other phrase in some of your articles that I'd like to correct, but I'm not sure of the proper way to rephrase it.  The Western Ghats and the Eastern Ghats are mountain ranges.  I am not sure if there is an exact definition of the Deccan plateau, but in my mind, the plateau per se does not include the Ghats.  This is not to say that there are no mountains on the plateau, there are, but these are mostly the isolated remains of extinct volcanos, and stick out very suddenly in an otherwise relatively flat landscape.  There is nothing at all flat about the Ghats, and so I would not include them in the plateau.  Of course, others might differ with me.  So,  regarding various rivers, I would say that they begin in the Eastern\/Western Ghats, and then flow across the Deccan plateau.  -- +++$+++ I again thank your for your comments which are more flattering than I probably deserve.  We will see how the mediation goes.  I see that a great deal of progress has been made with your communication with Hanuman Das.  That is very good, and I imagine it brings quite  a bit of relief.  Thank you again for your work on dams and rivers etc. I hope you don't mind that I made some adjustments to [[Sivasamudram Falls]] the other day.  Also, there is one other phrase in some of your articles that I'd like to correct, but I'm not sure of the proper way to rephrase it.  The Western Ghats and the Eastern Ghats are mountain ranges.  I am not sure if there is an exact definition of the Deccan plateau, but in my mind, the plateau per se does not include the Ghats.  This is not to say that there are no mountains on the plateau, there are, but these are mostly the isolated remains of extinct volcanos, and stick out very suddenly in an otherwise relatively flat landscape.  There is nothing at all flat about the Ghats, and so I would not include them in the plateau.  Of course, others might differ with me.  So,  regarding various rivers, I would say that they begin in the Eastern/Western Ghats, and then flow across the Deccan plateau.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
265731 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265730 +++$+++ 265730 +++$+++ 2006-11-13 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.163474340E09 +++$+++ Yes, it can be frustrating to explain something repeatedly only to have it ignored.  Hopefully, there will be better communication soon.  -- +++$+++ :Yes, it can be frustrating to explain something repeatedly only to have it ignored.  Hopefully, there will be better communication soon.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 19:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

87979 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.311615900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reminder. :) BTW see the latest UK Indian GLAM collab - [[Tipu's Tiger]]. :))  +++$+++ Thanks for the reminder. :) BTW see the latest UK Indian GLAM collab - [[Tipu's Tiger]]. :)) [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 10:45, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
87980 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87979 +++$+++ 87979 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311617640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 11:14, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

265732 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265732 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-14 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.163502480E09 +++$+++ It's not another person. It's already a gang effort, on both sides. Has been going on for some time, check the histories. &mdash; +++$+++ It's not another person. It's already a gang effort, on both sides. Has been going on for some time, check the histories. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 03:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
265733 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265732 +++$+++ 265732 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.163505420E09 +++$+++ Clearly, he thinks [[User:Rottentomatoe]] is a sock. Could be. Looks like [[User:Pete K]] has been holding his own for quite some time against a couple of editors, but recently, two or three new single purpose accounts have appeared, all on the same side. That's rather suspicious, don't you think? &mdash; +++$+++ :Clearly, he thinks [[User:Rottentomatoe]] is a sock. Could be. Looks like [[User:Pete K]] has been holding his own for quite some time against a couple of editors, but recently, two or three new single purpose accounts have appeared, all on the same side. That's rather suspicious, don't you think? &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 03:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
265734 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265732 +++$+++ 265732 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.163505420E09 +++$+++ By the way, I posted an article RfC to get some more eyes on it. I almost always do that when 999 is trying to stop a revert warrior. If a few other people show up and try to keep order, it tends to improve everything. That and getting the revert warrrior out of the way for a day or two. Sometimes other editors mysteriously dissappear at the same time (due to autoblocking). Curious, that. &mdash; +++$+++ :By the way, I posted an article RfC to get some more eyes on it. I almost always do that when 999 is trying to stop a revert warrior. If a few other people show up and try to keep order, it tends to improve everything. That and getting the revert warrrior out of the way for a day or two. Sometimes other editors mysteriously dissappear at the same time (due to autoblocking). Curious, that. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 03:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
265735 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265732 +++$+++ 265734 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.163510220E09 +++$+++ Here's info on article RfCs: [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment#Request_comment_on_articles]]. &mdash; +++$+++ ::Here's info on article RfCs: [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment#Request_comment_on_articles]]. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 05:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

3591 +++$+++ Pohta ce-am pohtit +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-03 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.267622340E09 +++$+++ This article was deleted rather recently, see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Twin+%28windowing+system%29]. You should add the two inline refs I used for it in the [[GNU Screen]] article, otherwise it's likely it will be deleted again. Also, ask an admin, e.g. [[User:DGG]] to [[WP:USERFY]] the old article to your userspace. It had some info worth restoring, I think. The German [[LinuxUser]] article is pretty good, there's also a Spanish version of it, but no English one that I could find.  +++$+++ This article was deleted rather recently, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Twin+%28windowing+system%29]. You should add the two inline refs I used for it in the [[GNU Screen]] article, otherwise it's likely it will be deleted again. Also, ask an admin, e.g. [[User:DGG]] to [[WP:USERFY]] the old article to your userspace. It had some info worth restoring, I think. The German [[LinuxUser]] article is pretty good, there's also a Spanish version of it, but no English one that I could find. [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit|<small>ping</small>]] 05:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
3592 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3591 +++$+++ 3591 +++$+++ 2010-03-03 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.267626480E09 +++$+++ I'm short on time to go add the two refs you mention: i may do it, and may not. Perhaps you would do so yourself ? And i doubt that i'd add a foreign language ref anyway, unless it is quite rich in illustrations (i.e., screenshots). -- +++$+++ :I'm short on time to go add the two refs you mention: i may do it, and may not. Perhaps you would do so yourself ? And i doubt that i'd add a foreign language ref anyway, unless it is quite rich in illustrations (i.e., screenshots). --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 06:28, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
3593 +++$+++ Pohta ce-am pohtit +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3591 +++$+++ 3592 +++$+++ 2010-03-03 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.267686120E09 +++$+++ Umm, admin [[User:L'Aquatique]] hasn't edited since May last year, so you'll have long time to wait...  +++$+++ :: Umm, admin [[User:L'Aquatique]] hasn't edited since May last year, so you'll have long time to wait... [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit|<small>ping</small>]] 23:02, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
3594 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3591 +++$+++ 3593 +++$+++ 2010-03-04 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.267709880E09 +++$+++ Ouch, good catch. Thanks, i'll try someone else then, and be more attentive this time. -- +++$+++ :::Ouch, good catch. Thanks, i'll try someone else then, and be more attentive this time. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 05:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
3595 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3591 +++$+++ 3593 +++$+++ 2010-03-08 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.268056980E09 +++$+++ OK, that's done. I'll keep the subpage for a while, for you to pick up whatever from it, then i'll scrap it. -- +++$+++ :::OK, that's done. I'll keep the subpage for a while, for you to pick up whatever from it, then i'll scrap it. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 06:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

265737 +++$+++ Avraham +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-14 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.163513460E09 +++$+++ I respectfully submit that there is a difference between a user's ''personal'' page on a university server, and an ''official'' university page on that same server. --  +++$+++ I respectfully submit that there is a difference between a user's ''personal'' page on a university server, and an ''official'' university page on that same server. -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] 06:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
265738 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265737 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.163539080E09 +++$+++ responded on user Avi's talk page.   +++$+++ :*responded on user Avi's talk page.  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 13:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

524887 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-05 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.125926760E09 +++$+++ Please do not put ICD boxes on pages just dealing with a symptom[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ataxia&diff=22595964&oldid=21576119]. This creates confusion and adds very little information.  +++$+++ Please do not put ICD boxes on pages just dealing with a symptom[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ataxia&diff=22595964&oldid=21576119]. This creates confusion and adds very little information. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 06:26, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
524888 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524887 +++$+++ 524887 +++$+++ 2005-09-05 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.125977160E09 +++$+++ Could you please respond to my message before putting the box back? [[Ataxia]] is not a diagnosis, and even the ICD itself recognises this. I think that by putting ICD boxes on symptom pages we cause confusion.  +++$+++ :Could you please respond to my message before putting the box back? [[Ataxia]] is not a diagnosis, and even the ICD itself recognises this. I think that by putting ICD boxes on symptom pages we cause confusion. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 20:26, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

3596 +++$+++ Opbeith +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-19 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.269016680E09 +++$+++ I only worked on the article because it was cited as an article that help was needed expanding.  It was interesting, of course, but as far as I'm concerned it's water under the bridge.  Just get rid of it if you think it's inappropriate.  Be sure that you are doing it for good reason rather than on the basis of automatic warning signals generated by thre use of referencesbut otherwise do whatever you like.  I find too much effort is wasted too often at Wikipedia, it's better to move on.  Enough, goodbye to Richard the Pilgrim, good luck with it.   +++$+++ I only worked on the article because it was cited as an article that help was needed expanding.  It was interesting, of course, but as far as I'm concerned it's water under the bridge.  Just get rid of it if you think it's inappropriate.  Be sure that you are doing it for good reason rather than on the basis of automatic warning signals generated by thre use of referencesbut otherwise do whatever you like.  I find too much effort is wasted too often at Wikipedia, it's better to move on.  Enough, goodbye to Richard the Pilgrim, good luck with it.  [[User:Opbeith|Opbeith]] ([[User talk:Opbeith|talk]]) 09:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
3597 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3596 +++$+++ 3596 +++$+++ 2010-03-19 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.269017940E09 +++$+++ And yes, BTW, blogs as sources are not usually accepted here, are they ? And who is this Butler ? What did he write ? -- +++$+++ :And yes, BTW, blogs as sources are not usually accepted here, are they ? And who is this Butler ? What did he write ? --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 09:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
3598 +++$+++ Opbeith +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3596 +++$+++ 3597 +++$+++ 2010-03-24 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.269463320E09 +++$+++ I don't object too much to having copyright issues pointed out to me when they're genuine, rather than spurious, it's the demolition work of finicky reference demanders who demand every blade of grass documented or they'll take a scraper to the lawn that fisnishes me off.  Anyhow, though I can see your intervention was quite reasonable here I think the episode came at the right time to teach me a lesson.  I've come to other articles as a break from the articles that I'm fundamentally interested in \/ slightly knowledgeable about, but too often the exercise ends up with too much time wasted after getting bogged down in arguments with people who aren't interested in either the subject or the amount of effort people have devoted to material that isn't up to their authoritarianly applied standards.  You've made reasonable objections clear and I don't quibble about them, but I won't do anything more with the article except apologise for you getting the full blast of my exasperation.  But anyhow the episode has been useful in helping me take the sabotage of another time-consuming article elsewhere with equanimity.  +++$+++ ::I don't object too much to having copyright issues pointed out to me when they're genuine, rather than spurious, it's the demolition work of finicky reference demanders who demand every blade of grass documented or they'll take a scraper to the lawn that fisnishes me off.  Anyhow, though I can see your intervention was quite reasonable here I think the episode came at the right time to teach me a lesson.  I've come to other articles as a break from the articles that I'm fundamentally interested in / slightly knowledgeable about, but too often the exercise ends up with too much time wasted after getting bogged down in arguments with people who aren't interested in either the subject or the amount of effort people have devoted to material that isn't up to their authoritarianly applied standards.  You've made reasonable objections clear and I don't quibble about them, but I won't do anything more with the article except apologise for you getting the full blast of my exasperation.  But anyhow the episode has been useful in helping me take the sabotage of another time-consuming article elsewhere with equanimity. [[User:Opbeith|Opbeith]] ([[User talk:Opbeith|talk]]) 13:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
3599 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3596 +++$+++ 3598 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.269503940E09 +++$+++ OK, i fixed it, removed a bunch of stuff such as from unreliable sources : blogs and web sites which don't bother to name their sources, they could just be writing anything any which way they like. And provided refs for the St Patrick's one (borderline ref, if you ask me). Removed the Copyright violation tag, now that it is perhaps acceptable. Man you'd done a sloppy job, throwing crappy URLs left and right, some not even matching the statements they were supposed to back up. No thanks. -- +++$+++ :::OK, i fixed it, removed a bunch of stuff such as from unreliable sources : blogs and web sites which don't bother to name their sources, they could just be writing anything any which way they like. And provided refs for the St Patrick's one (borderline ref, if you ask me). Removed the Copyright violation tag, now that it is perhaps acceptable. Man you'd done a sloppy job, throwing crappy URLs left and right, some not even matching the statements they were supposed to back up. No thanks. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 00:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
3600 +++$+++ Opbeith +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3596 +++$+++ 3599 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.269529800E09 +++$+++ So I'll carry on trying to fill in the gaps at Richard the Pilgrim.  Essentially you've made that worthwhile doing.  +++$+++ ::::So I'll carry on trying to fill in the gaps at Richard the Pilgrim.  Essentially you've made that worthwhile doing. [[User:Opbeith|Opbeith]] ([[User talk:Opbeith|talk]]) 08:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
3601 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3596 +++$+++ 3600 +++$+++ 2010-03-26 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.269592800E09 +++$+++ Now this brings to my memory that there is a work-in-progress template banner somewhere, to be apposed to an article in such an instance. Nag, nag, nag. Better luck next time. -- +++$+++ :::::Now this brings to my memory that there is a work-in-progress template banner somewhere, to be apposed to an article in such an instance. Nag, nag, nag. Better luck next time. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 01:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

265743 +++$+++ Rosencomet +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-14 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.163551980E09 +++$+++ You know, these external links to provide citations were begun because YOU kept demanding them. I certainly didn't need the extra work citing every appearance, and then preserving the citations against revertion so that the entire thing was not deleted due to lack of citation. I've said to Samir and to Hanuman Das that if I could be assured it would not cause the information to be deleted, I would be glad to take down many of these external links. But I have also been told that the citations were NECESSARY. How do I preserve my work and satisfy contradictory criticisms?  +++$+++ You know, these external links to provide citations were begun because YOU kept demanding them. I certainly didn't need the extra work citing every appearance, and then preserving the citations against revertion so that the entire thing was not deleted due to lack of citation. I've said to Samir and to Hanuman Das that if I could be assured it would not cause the information to be deleted, I would be glad to take down many of these external links. But I have also been told that the citations were NECESSARY. How do I preserve my work and satisfy contradictory criticisms? [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]] 16:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
265744 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265743 +++$+++ 265743 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.163554080E09 +++$+++ (answered on [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]]'s talk page)   +++$+++ *(answered on [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]]'s talk page)  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 17:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

3603 +++$+++ Syncategoremata +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3603 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-07 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.273241280E09 +++$+++ All the best. \u2013 +++$+++ All the best. –[[User:Syncategoremata|Syncategoremata]] ([[User talk:Syncategoremata|talk]]) 07:08, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
3604 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3603 +++$+++ 3603 +++$+++ 2010-05-07 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.273244400E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Yes, while cleaning up, i of course ran into those \"cf.\"s, and started examining them, which led me to suspect exactly what you put forth. I thought that i would keep this first pass of clean-up, so that it all becomes clearer, then a second pass, more thorough, can be performed. -- +++$+++ :Thank you. Yes, while cleaning up, i of course ran into those "cf."s, and started examining them, which led me to suspect exactly what you put forth. I thought that i would keep this first pass of clean-up, so that it all becomes clearer, then a second pass, more thorough, can be performed. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 08:00, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
3605 +++$+++ Syncategoremata +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3603 +++$+++ 3604 +++$+++ 2010-05-07 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.273245000E09 +++$+++ Sounds perfect to me. All the best. \u2013 +++$+++ ::Sounds perfect to me. All the best. –[[User:Syncategoremata|Syncategoremata]] ([[User talk:Syncategoremata|talk]]) 08:10, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
3606 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3603 +++$+++ 3605 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.274704860E09 +++$+++ Rats, just now read the Sources Noticeboard. How did i miss that from your first message ? -- +++$+++ :::Rats, just now read the Sources Noticeboard. How did i miss that from your first message ? --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 05:41, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
3607 +++$+++ Syncategoremata +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3603 +++$+++ 3606 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.274722020E09 +++$+++ All the best. \u2013 +++$+++ ::::All the best. –[[User:Syncategoremata|Syncategoremata]] ([[User talk:Syncategoremata|talk]]) 10:27, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
3608 +++$+++ Syncategoremata +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3603 +++$+++ 3606 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.274722800E09 +++$+++ Erm, rant over and all the best. \u2013 +++$+++ ::::Erm, rant over and all the best. –[[User:Syncategoremata|Syncategoremata]] ([[User talk:Syncategoremata|talk]]) 10:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
3609 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3603 +++$+++ 3608 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.274762820E09 +++$+++ It seems that the article which i put back has been seriously reviewed since its first version by Zaimeche, hence my thinking it of possible value. Hopefully some will examine it closely enough and help us out by rendering their verdict. You, possibly ? (as if you weren't doing enough already. Sorry to see such a load) -- +++$+++ :::::It seems that the article which i put back has been seriously reviewed since its first version by Zaimeche, hence my thinking it of possible value. Hopefully some will examine it closely enough and help us out by rendering their verdict. You, possibly ? (as if you weren't doing enough already. Sorry to see such a load) --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 21:47, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
3610 +++$+++ Syncategoremata +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3603 +++$+++ 3609 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.274768160E09 +++$+++ Ah well, all my best. \u2013 +++$+++ ::::::Ah well, all my best. –[[User:Syncategoremata|Syncategoremata]] ([[User talk:Syncategoremata|talk]]) 23:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
3611 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3603 +++$+++ 3608 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.274766780E09 +++$+++ Wow, you guys worked really well, as i see in the RFC on Jagged85. A very impressive read. Sincere congratulations, and thanks. -- +++$+++ :::::Wow, you guys worked really well, as i see in the RFC on Jagged85. A very impressive read. Sincere congratulations, and thanks. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 22:53, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
3612 +++$+++ Syncategoremata +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3603 +++$+++ 3611 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.274768160E09 +++$+++ All the best once more. \u2013 +++$+++ ::::::All the best once more. –[[User:Syncategoremata|Syncategoremata]] ([[User talk:Syncategoremata|talk]]) 23:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

265748 +++$+++ Balajiviswanathan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265748 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.163645280E09 +++$+++ The aim is to create content for every major Hindu temple. Many of them have immense historic value and considerable religious importance. So, I'm trying to build articles on them. It is not possible in a day, but over the course of next one year, it is possible to build a detailed article for around 100 major temples in Tamilnadu, with their historical and religious significance. It is as simple as that.  +++$+++ The aim is to create content for every major Hindu temple. Many of them have immense historic value and considerable religious importance. So, I'm trying to build articles on them. It is not possible in a day, but over the course of next one year, it is possible to build a detailed article for around 100 major temples in Tamilnadu, with their historical and religious significance. It is as simple as that. [[User:Balajiviswanathan|Balajiviswanathan]] 18:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
265749 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265748 +++$+++ 265748 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.163645940E09 +++$+++ Have you checked the articles that exist already? There are many people interested in temples and you don't want to exclude them from your plans. Articles are supposed to be collaborations, not single person projects. Also, you have to cite references for your material per [[WP:CITE]]. Did you look at the links I sent you?   +++$+++ :Have you checked the articles that exist already? There are many people interested in temples and you don't want to exclude them from your plans. Articles are supposed to be collaborations, not single person projects. Also, you have to cite references for your material per [[WP:CITE]]. Did you look at the links I sent you?  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 18:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
265750 +++$+++ Balajiviswanathan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265748 +++$+++ 265748 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.163646120E09 +++$+++ For the last few days I'm checking out the various categories where Hindu temples are there and doing my assessments. I've also moved a number of India-struct-stub and other categories where Hindu temples were there to Hindu-temple-stub. I've also added more categories based on deity, location etc and re-categorized a lot them from top level categories - Hindu temples and Hindu temples in India. In this process, I found dozens of duplicate articles and I've merged them with the main article. I'm also changing titles to dissambiguate better. Regarding multiple temples with same name, I'm adding the city name at the end and for temples with multiple names (Thiruvanaikaval, Tiruvanaikkavall,Jambukeswarar temple...) I've created redirections. I believe that Wikipedia should contain info on all these temples as these are all 1000 year old temples of significant value to Hinduism. And, I'm slowly trying to get these into colloboration modes, starting with the most important one, Tirupathy.  +++$+++ :For the last few days I'm checking out the various categories where Hindu temples are there and doing my assessments. I've also moved a number of India-struct-stub and other categories where Hindu temples were there to Hindu-temple-stub. I've also added more categories based on deity, location etc and re-categorized a lot them from top level categories - Hindu temples and Hindu temples in India. In this process, I found dozens of duplicate articles and I've merged them with the main article. I'm also changing titles to dissambiguate better. Regarding multiple temples with same name, I'm adding the city name at the end and for temples with multiple names (Thiruvanaikaval, Tiruvanaikkavall,Jambukeswarar temple...) I've created redirections. I believe that Wikipedia should contain info on all these temples as these are all 1000 year old temples of significant value to Hinduism. And, I'm slowly trying to get these into colloboration modes, starting with the most important one, Tirupathy. [[User:Balajiviswanathan|Balajiviswanathan]] 19:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
265751 +++$+++ Balajiviswanathan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265748 +++$+++ 265750 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163646360E09 +++$+++ Basically, I'm now getting irritated by your repeated messages. I've never said these are non-Wikipedia projects. I'm also not stopping colloboration and indeed trying to get more people involved in the process and slowly trying to get them into WP India WikiProject Hinduism projects. I've moved them appropriately, as many of them were abandoned months back. If someone had been working on them, I would surely try to revert it back. Most of these were stubs and there are no discussions on them. If you have any questions about an article, point them directly.   +++$+++ ::Basically, I'm now getting irritated by your repeated messages. I've never said these are non-Wikipedia projects. I'm also not stopping colloboration and indeed trying to get more people involved in the process and slowly trying to get them into WP India WikiProject Hinduism projects. I've moved them appropriately, as many of them were abandoned months back. If someone had been working on them, I would surely try to revert it back. Most of these were stubs and there are no discussions on them. If you have any questions about an article, point them directly.  [[User:Balajiviswanathan|Balajiviswanathan]] 19:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

527895 +++$+++ Keenan Pepper +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-02 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.183423980E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Wikipedia talk:OTRS#OTRS protection message needs link to this page]]. \u2014 +++$+++ Please see [[Wikipedia talk:OTRS#OTRS protection message needs link to this page]]. —[[User:Keenan Pepper|Keenan Pepper]] 17:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
527896 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527895 +++$+++ 527895 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.183723560E09 +++$+++ On that note, can the article be recreated as a stub and semi-protected now? ''' +++$+++ :On that note, can the article be recreated as a stub and semi-protected now? '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 05:06, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

265752 +++$+++ Balajiviswanathan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265752 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.163645460E09 +++$+++ Regarding Badrinath Temple, I just moved the contents from the existing article [[Badrinath]], as we wanted it to describe about the town. I didnt spend much time on editing that. You could comment all the contents out, and I'll work on them, when I find time.  +++$+++ Regarding Badrinath Temple, I just moved the contents from the existing article [[Badrinath]], as we wanted it to describe about the town. I didnt spend much time on editing that. You could comment all the contents out, and I'll work on them, when I find time. [[User:Balajiviswanathan|Balajiviswanathan]] 18:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
265753 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265752 +++$+++ 265752 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.163646180E09 +++$+++ You make it sound like these are your articles. They are Wikipedia's articles. It is wrong to move contents from one article to another without consulting with other people on the Discussion page and getting consensus first.   +++$+++ :You make it sound like these are your articles. They are Wikipedia's articles. It is wrong to move contents from one article to another without consulting with other people on the Discussion page and getting consensus first.  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 19:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

265754 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.163671620E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse,  I think the two articles really are duplicates.  There is a village by the falls, but it is small.  If it is notable enough to have its own article, there are many other villages that would also deserve there own articles.  I have refrained from adding articles about small villages because it seemed to me somewhat of \"fancruft\" or \"vanity\" and probably would not be considered notable by a large number of editors.  (On the other hand, in my mind they are more important than Pokemon characters -- but then who am I to say so?)  But getting back to Sivasamudram, I think if you want the article to have the name \"Falls\" in it, you should just merge the two into the \"Falls\" article and leave the other as a redirect (so it isn't recreated).  That is my opinion, but I am always willing to listen to alternative views.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Hi Mattisse,  I think the two articles really are duplicates.  There is a village by the falls, but it is small.  If it is notable enough to have its own article, there are many other villages that would also deserve there own articles.  I have refrained from adding articles about small villages because it seemed to me somewhat of "fancruft" or "vanity" and probably would not be considered notable by a large number of editors.  (On the other hand, in my mind they are more important than Pokemon characters -- but then who am I to say so?)  But getting back to Sivasamudram, I think if you want the article to have the name "Falls" in it, you should just merge the two into the "Falls" article and leave the other as a redirect (so it isn't recreated).  That is my opinion, but I am always willing to listen to alternative views.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 02:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265755 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265754 +++$+++ 265754 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.163678220E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I hope you are not angry with me.  I merged [[Brihadeeswarar Temple]] and [[Brihadeshvara Temple]] because they were both about the same temple.  (Both names are recognizable to Indians.)  If the article is in poor shape, that is my fault, because I'm not that great at writing articles.  Your version stated that the temple was at Talakaveri, and so I was skeptical of it's accuracy.  That is why I merged into the original article.  I didn't care about the name, but only that there not be two articles about the same subject with almost identical names.  It was only after I made the merge that I noticed comments from Hanuman Das and contacted him.  I feel the same about Sivasumadram articles.  I don't care about the name, but there shouldn't be two articles about the same thing.  One should be a redirect to the other, and no useful information should be lost.  I hope this helps to explain.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :Hi Mattisse, I hope you are not angry with me.  I merged [[Brihadeeswarar Temple]] and [[Brihadeshvara Temple]] because they were both about the same temple.  (Both names are recognizable to Indians.)  If the article is in poor shape, that is my fault, because I'm not that great at writing articles.  Your version stated that the temple was at Talakaveri, and so I was skeptical of it's accuracy.  That is why I merged into the original article.  I didn't care about the name, but only that there not be two articles about the same subject with almost identical names.  It was only after I made the merge that I noticed comments from Hanuman Das and contacted him.  I feel the same about Sivasumadram articles.  I don't care about the name, but there shouldn't be two articles about the same thing.  One should be a redirect to the other, and no useful information should be lost.  I hope this helps to explain.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 03:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265756 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265754 +++$+++ 265755 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.163708280E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I believe you have made a great many good contributions to India related articles.  I think you certainly do a better job of organizing an article and making it readable than myself.  However, if you are frustrated with working on India related articles, and wish to stop for awhile I understand.  I do believe, though, that you are misunderstanding my position.  Do you agree that it is not good to have two articles on the same subject with different article names?  What would be your solution to this problem?  You do understand that I do not mind if the name is one thing or the name is another, don't you?  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Hi Mattisse, I believe you have made a great many good contributions to India related articles.  I think you certainly do a better job of organizing an article and making it readable than myself.  However, if you are frustrated with working on India related articles, and wish to stop for awhile I understand.  I do believe, though, that you are misunderstanding my position.  Do you agree that it is not good to have two articles on the same subject with different article names?  What would be your solution to this problem?  You do understand that I do not mind if the name is one thing or the name is another, don't you?  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 12:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265757 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265754 +++$+++ 265756 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.163709000E09 +++$+++ You write \"I agree with his method of discussing it with others and not acting abitrarily and alone. \"  To what are you referring?  -- +++$+++ :::You write "I agree with his method of discussing it with others and not acting abitrarily and alone. "  To what are you referring?  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 12:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265758 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265754 +++$+++ 265757 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.163712120E09 +++$+++ To what do I refer? I refer to [[User:Dineshkannambadi]]'s using the Discussion page of   [[Sivasamudram Falls]] to communicate, and to the fact that he takes it upon himself to sent messages to someone like me out of courtesy to apprise me of proposed changes on articles I have been involved with,  soliciting feedback first, before he makes changes.  +++$+++ ::::To what do I refer? I refer to [[User:Dineshkannambadi]]'s using the Discussion page of   [[Sivasamudram Falls]] to communicate, and to the fact that he takes it upon himself to sent messages to someone like me out of courtesy to apprise me of proposed changes on articles I have been involved with,  soliciting feedback first, before he makes changes. [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 13:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

612271 +++$+++ FeloniousMonk +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-13 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.150241880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note and handy link. Interesting, that.  +++$+++ Thanks for the note and handy link. Interesting, that. [[User:FeloniousMonk|FeloniousMonk]] 16:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
612272 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612271 +++$+++ 612271 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.150242840E09 +++$+++ Glad you liked it. The yapping terriers of ignorance seen in a critical light. .. +++$+++ :Glad you liked it. The yapping terriers of ignorance seen in a critical light. ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 16:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

527901 +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527901 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-11 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.184140980E09 +++$+++ Hi Chad, I reverted [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:J.P.Lon\/Userboxes\/Interest-Economics&diff=prev&oldid=143704497 your removal] of the user category from [[User:J.P.Lon\/Userboxes\/Interest-Economics]]. Though I agree that this needs to be done to most userboxes (especially ones with questionable\/bogus categorisations ... e.g., one that states something like \"N'Sync rocks!\" and categorises users into [[:Category:Wikipedians interested in music]]), this is a case where the userbox itself makes an explicit claim of interest in the subject: \"This user is interested in economics.\" Cheers, ''' +++$+++ Hi Chad, I reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:J.P.Lon/Userboxes/Interest-Economics&diff=prev&oldid=143704497 your removal] of the user category from [[User:J.P.Lon/Userboxes/Interest-Economics]]. Though I agree that this needs to be done to most userboxes (especially ones with questionable/bogus categorisations ... e.g., one that states something like "N'Sync rocks!" and categorises users into [[:Category:Wikipedians interested in music]]), this is a case where the userbox itself makes an explicit claim of interest in the subject: "This user is interested in economics." Cheers, '''[[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]''' <sup>''([[User talk:Black Falcon|Talk]])''</sup> 01:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
527902 +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527901 +++$+++ 527901 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.184146140E09 +++$+++ Would you also please take a look at [[:Category:Wikipedians with IBS]]? I can't figure out why Koncorde's userpage shows up in that category, which is otherwise eligible for speedy deletion per [[WP:CSD#C1|CSD C1]] (including the 4-day requirement, see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User%3AUBX%2FIBS&diff=143215258&oldid=135174010]). -- ''' +++$+++ :Would you also please take a look at [[:Category:Wikipedians with IBS]]? I can't figure out why Koncorde's userpage shows up in that category, which is otherwise eligible for speedy deletion per [[WP:CSD#C1|CSD C1]] (including the 4-day requirement, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AUBX%2FIBS&diff=143215258&oldid=135174010]). -- '''[[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]''' <sup>''([[User talk:Black Falcon|Talk]])''</sup> 02:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
527903 +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527901 +++$+++ 527902 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.184206020E09 +++$+++ Thanks. ''' +++$+++ ::Thanks. '''[[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]''' <sup>''([[User talk:Black Falcon|Talk]])''</sup> 19:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

3615 +++$+++ Ohiostandard +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3615 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-02 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.280777940E09 +++$+++ Calling another editor \"chicken shit\", even in an edit summary, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill&action=historysubmit&diff=375608944&oldid=375603153 as you did here], is a good way to get blocked. I suggest you keep you emotions in check, or if you can't do that, walk away from your computer until you can. &nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;<font face=\"Cambria\"> +++$+++ Calling another editor "chicken shit", even in an edit summary, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill&action=historysubmit&diff=375608944&oldid=375603153 as you did here], is a good way to get blocked. I suggest you keep you emotions in check, or if you can't do that, walk away from your computer until you can. &nbsp;–&nbsp;<font face="Cambria">[[User:Ohiostandard|<font color="teal">'''OhioStandard'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Ohiostandard|talk]])</font> 12:39, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
3616 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3615 +++$+++ 3615 +++$+++ 2010-08-02 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.280796540E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that one slipped. Sorry. -- +++$+++ :Yeah, that one slipped. Sorry. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 17:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
3617 +++$+++ Ohiostandard +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3615 +++$+++ 3616 +++$+++ 2010-08-03 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.280822940E09 +++$+++ Good of you to say so. I understand: I know from experience that this can be a ''very'' frustrating place sometimes. And I don't mean to sound condescending at all, but my rule has always been that the urge to become aggressive toward other editors is a good alarm bell to tell me that I need to back away and spend more time on my real life and less time (for awhile, anyway) dealing with the silliness that often arises here. Good for one's peace of mind, and all that. Best, &nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;<font face=\"Cambria\"> +++$+++ ::Good of you to say so. I understand: I know from experience that this can be a ''very'' frustrating place sometimes. And I don't mean to sound condescending at all, but my rule has always been that the urge to become aggressive toward other editors is a good alarm bell to tell me that I need to back away and spend more time on my real life and less time (for awhile, anyway) dealing with the silliness that often arises here. Good for one's peace of mind, and all that. Best, &nbsp;–&nbsp;<font face="Cambria">[[User:Ohiostandard|<font color="teal">'''OhioStandard'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Ohiostandard|talk]])</font> 01:09, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
3618 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3615 +++$+++ 3615 +++$+++ 2010-09-13 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.284364800E09 +++$+++ Yes i am ; i haven't checked there in quite a while (the timestamps will tell you so). Back when i contributed to it, things were very protected already, because of the spam ; you had to dig deeper to find your way around. Perhaps you could tell me more about what you are tying to do, and i can take a look. -- +++$+++ :Yes i am ; i haven't checked there in quite a while (the timestamps will tell you so). Back when i contributed to it, things were very protected already, because of the spam ; you had to dig deeper to find your way around. Perhaps you could tell me more about what you are tying to do, and i can take a look. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 01:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

584966 +++$+++ Pinkadelica +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584966 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-23 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.203754380E09 +++$+++ Hi Acalamari. In response to your question, yes, I would! Thank you for the offer. Is there anything I need to do first?  +++$+++ Hi Acalamari. In response to your question, yes, I would! Thank you for the offer. Is there anything I need to do first? [[User:Pinkadelica|Pinkadelica]] ([[User talk:Pinkadelica|talk]]) 00:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
584967 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584966 +++$+++ 584966 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.203754620E09 +++$+++ Well, normally you would have to go to [[Wikipedia:Requests for rollback]] or ask an administrator for it. However, neither of those need to be done because I am an administrator and I asked ''you'' if you wanted rollback. :) Rollback granted. Good luck.  +++$+++ :Well, normally you would have to go to [[Wikipedia:Requests for rollback]] or ask an administrator for it. However, neither of those need to be done because I am an administrator and I asked ''you'' if you wanted rollback. :) Rollback granted. Good luck. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 00:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
584968 +++$+++ Pinkadelica +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584966 +++$+++ 584967 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.203768240E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much. I appreciate the privilege.  +++$+++ ::Thank you so much. I appreciate the privilege. [[User:Pinkadelica|Pinkadelica]] ([[User talk:Pinkadelica|talk]]) 04:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
584969 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584966 +++$+++ 584968 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.203818640E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :)  +++$+++ :::You're welcome. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

3619 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-10 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.299779400E09 +++$+++ Hi. I have just deleted a string of R3 redirects you tagged for this, and I am a bit worried because I can't see where the actual article has gone amid all this moving and redirecting - is it still there somewhere? If not, I'd better find where it ended up and undelete that one. If I have to do that, what ''should'' it be called? Regards,  +++$+++ Hi. I have just deleted a string of R3 redirects you tagged for this, and I am a bit worried because I can't see where the actual article has gone amid all this moving and redirecting - is it still there somewhere? If not, I'd better find where it ended up and undelete that one. If I have to do that, what ''should'' it be called? Regards, [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 09:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
3620 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3619 +++$+++ 3619 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.299806580E09 +++$+++ [[Samsung SGH-T459]]. Notice how the 4 and the 5 were inverted in the redirects i asked to remove. Thanks for helping me complete the clean-up. -- +++$+++ :[[Samsung SGH-T459]]. Notice how the 4 and the 5 were inverted in the redirects i asked to remove. Thanks for helping me complete the clean-up. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 17:23, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

527908 +++$+++ Magnus animum +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-15 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.184498460E09 +++$+++ Of course, it is entirely your decision if you want to make the change. :-) <small>\u2014<\/small>'''[[User:Animum Delivery Bot|<font color=\"Green\">\xab<\/font>]]&nbsp; +++$+++ Of course, it is entirely your decision if you want to make the change. :-) <small>—</small>'''[[User:Animum Delivery Bot|<font color="Green">«</font>]]&nbsp;[[User:Magnus animum|<font color="green">A<small>NIMUM</small></font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Magnus animum|<font color="Green">»</font>]]''' 04:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
527909 +++$+++ Magnus animum +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527908 +++$+++ 527908 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.184499480E09 +++$+++ It saves character usage. :-) <small>\u2014<\/small>'''[[User:Animum Delivery Bot|<font color=\"Green\">\xab<\/font>]]&nbsp; +++$+++ :It saves character usage. :-) <small>—</small>'''[[User:Animum Delivery Bot|<font color="Green">«</font>]]&nbsp;[[User:Magnus animum|<font color="green">A<small>NIMUM</small></font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Magnus animum|<font color="Green">»</font>]]''' 04:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

3622 +++$+++ UncleBubba +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-30 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.301520540E09 +++$+++ The \"gossip\" link, while it might be interesting, isn't discussion of changes to the article, as required by the guidelines, and doesn't belong here. &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ The "gossip" link, while it might be interesting, isn't discussion of changes to the article, as required by the guidelines, and doesn't belong here. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:UncleBubba|<b style="color:black">Uncl</b><b style="color:darkred">eBubba</b>]]&nbsp;<b><sup>(&nbsp;[[User talk:UncleBubba|T]]&nbsp;[[Special:Emailuser/UncleBubba|@]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/UncleBubba|C]]&nbsp;)</sup></b> 14:29, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
3623 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3622 +++$+++ 3622 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.301620620E09 +++$+++ I fail to see what the problem is, i am indicating that article from a reputable press entity to the contributors of the WP article, as a possibly interesting source, should they want to use it to further the WP article. I am certainly not using the talk page \"as a platform for my personal views on a subject\". Ms Nicks reveals quite a bit of interesting information in that article, possibly for the first time. It seems to me that your problem arises from my choice of the word \"gossip\". -- +++$+++ :I fail to see what the problem is, i am indicating that article from a reputable press entity to the contributors of the WP article, as a possibly interesting source, should they want to use it to further the WP article. I am certainly not using the talk page "as a platform for my personal views on a subject". Ms Nicks reveals quite a bit of interesting information in that article, possibly for the first time. It seems to me that your problem arises from my choice of the word "gossip". --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 18:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
3624 +++$+++ UncleBubba +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3622 +++$+++ 3623 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.301625060E09 +++$+++ Did you '''read''' [[WP:TALK]]? Please look there at #1.2, item 2. If there is something on the page in question that you wish to add to the WP article (in keeping with [[WP:BLP]]), say so. Otherwise, just parking a link isn't good. (BTW, does the site meet [[WP:RS]] guidelines?) What's to stop someone from Googling  \"Stevie Nicks\" and posting all the results here? It's just not necessary. And with any '''living person''' we must be extra-careful what we publish. &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Did you '''read''' [[WP:TALK]]? Please look there at #1.2, item 2. If there is something on the page in question that you wish to add to the WP article (in keeping with [[WP:BLP]]), say so. Otherwise, just parking a link isn't good. (BTW, does the site meet [[WP:RS]] guidelines?) What's to stop someone from Googling  "Stevie Nicks" and posting all the results here? It's just not necessary. And with any '''living person''' we must be extra-careful what we publish. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:UncleBubba|<b style="color:black">Uncl</b><b style="color:darkred">eBubba</b>]]&nbsp;<b><sup>(&nbsp;[[User talk:UncleBubba|T]]&nbsp;[[Special:Emailuser/UncleBubba|@]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/UncleBubba|C]]&nbsp;)</sup></b> 19:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
3625 +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ Jerome Charles Potts +++$+++ 3622 +++$+++ 3624 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.301635800E09 +++$+++ Anyway, it seems you know something i don't, so i'll drop it. Other than that, thanks for your RC patrolling. -- +++$+++ :::Anyway, it seems you know something i don't, so i'll drop it. Other than that, thanks for your RC patrolling. --[[User:Jerome Charles Potts|Jerome Potts]] ([[User talk:Jerome Charles Potts#top|talk]]) 22:30, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

550050 +++$+++ Bobby Hurley III +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-06 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.157560260E09 +++$+++ -- -- +++$+++ -- --[[User:Bobby Hurley III|Bobby Hurley III]] 09:31, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
550051 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550050 +++$+++ 550050 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.157585100E09 +++$+++ Because Adam doesn't seem to be notable. If you wish, I can undelete the article and send it to [[WP:AFD|afd]]... -- +++$+++ : Because Adam doesn't seem to be notable. If you wish, I can undelete the article and send it to [[WP:AFD|afd]]... --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 16:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
550052 +++$+++ Bobby Hurley III +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550050 +++$+++ 550051 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.157542680E09 +++$+++ Hi Dijxtra, That would be great. Please undelete and send the Adam Ireton article to AFD. -- +++$+++ :: Hi Dijxtra, That would be great. Please undelete and send the Adam Ireton article to AFD. --[[User:Bobby Hurley III|Bobby Hurley III]] 04:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
550053 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550050 +++$+++ 550052 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.157600820E09 +++$+++ Done. -- +++$+++ ::: Done. --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 20:47, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

265768 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265768 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.163741880E09 +++$+++ Hi, I found [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sivasamudram&oldid=86754383 this article] but I didn't see another.  Is there another article  on the town with more details?  -- +++$+++ Hi, I found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sivasamudram&oldid=86754383 this article] but I didn't see another.  Is there another article  on the town with more details?  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 21:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265769 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265768 +++$+++ 265768 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.163744280E09 +++$+++ As soon as I saw this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sivasamudram&direction=next&oldid=86754383] with the gratuitous \"citation needed\" tags I new something was going on. I stopped writing the article and didn't keep the information because there was no point. That was the last straw. I am not going through that again because 999 can get away with it. (That's what I mean when I say by only look superficially, harm is done.) All you are doing right now is bring back into my memory how awful things were that day.  So I am not open-minded to your defending 999 and in no way am I going to be involved in these articles again. Sorry! But this is quickly becoming a bad day just reliving this.   +++$+++ :As soon as I saw this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sivasamudram&direction=next&oldid=86754383] with the gratuitous "citation needed" tags I new something was going on. I stopped writing the article and didn't keep the information because there was no point. That was the last straw. I am not going through that again because 999 can get away with it. (That's what I mean when I say by only look superficially, harm is done.) All you are doing right now is bring back into my memory how awful things were that day.  So I am not open-minded to your defending 999 and in no way am I going to be involved in these articles again. Sorry! But this is quickly becoming a bad day just reliving this.  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 22:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265770 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265768 +++$+++ 265769 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.163745600E09 +++$+++ Do you see that [[Sivasamudram]] and [[Somanathapura]] are not the same place? And that the Falls are a third place? There is lots of interesting possibilities there, a power plant, dams... If a person is interested in water and energy and such as I am, then it is a joy to explore and dig up information -- to round out and figure it out and connect it all up. That is what this \"merge instantly\" method snuffs out completely. It takes away all joy. If there were a point I would merge articles if you wanted me to, but everything interesting, all possibilities of learning something new and fascinating, of a world opening up are now removed. (This is aside from 999 using you again.)  +++$+++ ::Do you see that [[Sivasamudram]] and [[Somanathapura]] are not the same place? And that the Falls are a third place? There is lots of interesting possibilities there, a power plant, dams... If a person is interested in water and energy and such as I am, then it is a joy to explore and dig up information -- to round out and figure it out and connect it all up. That is what this "merge instantly" method snuffs out completely. It takes away all joy. If there were a point I would merge articles if you wanted me to, but everything interesting, all possibilities of learning something new and fascinating, of a world opening up are now removed. (This is aside from 999 using you again.) [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 22:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265771 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265768 +++$+++ 265770 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.163745000E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry that the discussion has stirred painful feelings.  I will try to avoid mentioning it in the future.  I hope your evening goes better.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::I'm sorry that the discussion has stirred painful feelings.  I will try to avoid mentioning it in the future.  I hope your evening goes better.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265772 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265768 +++$+++ 265771 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.163746080E09 +++$+++ Please, let's drop it for now.  I need to go eat anyway.  Please take care.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::::Please, let's drop it for now.  I need to go eat anyway.  Please take care.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265773 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265768 +++$+++ 265772 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.163810940E09 +++$+++ No need to apologize.  No harm was done.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::::No need to apologize.  No harm was done.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 16:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
265774 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265768 +++$+++ 265772 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.163811240E09 +++$+++ By the way, in my \"youth\" as a Wikipedia editor, I used to involve myself in naming disputes, but came to feel involvement in such disputes was not something that I wanted to continue.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::::By the way, in my "youth" as a Wikipedia editor, I used to involve myself in naming disputes, but came to feel involvement in such disputes was not something that I wanted to continue.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 16:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
265775 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265768 +++$+++ 265774 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.163844900E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I hope your day has gone well.  The issues in the message you left me are related to things that you said made your day yesterday unpleasant.  If I handle those matters, they may not come out the way you desire.  If that is OK with you, then I will handle them, but if you care about the outcome, you should be involved yourself.  Please let me know whether you desire to be involved.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::::::Hi Mattisse, I hope your day has gone well.  The issues in the message you left me are related to things that you said made your day yesterday unpleasant.  If I handle those matters, they may not come out the way you desire.  If that is OK with you, then I will handle them, but if you care about the outcome, you should be involved yourself.  Please let me know whether you desire to be involved.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 02:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

3626 +++$+++ DJ Silverfish +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-03 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.283551620E09 +++$+++ Thanks.   +++$+++ Thanks.  [[User:DJ Silverfish|DJ Silverfish]] ([[User talk:DJ Silverfish|talk]]) 15:07, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
3627 +++$+++ Namiba +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3626 +++$+++ 3626 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.284278760E09 +++$+++ \"What is your problem? Why did you revert my edits?\" is not exactly a pleasant way to initiate a talk page communication. I think you need to keep your attitude in check per the recent blocking.-- +++$+++ :"What is your problem? Why did you revert my edits?" is not exactly a pleasant way to initiate a talk page communication. I think you need to keep your attitude in check per the recent blocking.--[[User:Namiba|TM]] 01:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

3628 +++$+++ Cardinal91 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-16 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.284632040E09 +++$+++ In response to [[:User_talk:Cardinal91#Labno|your query]]: I added [[Michael Labno]] because the Libertarian Party was recently granted ballot access through citizen petition to the U.S. Senator election in Illinois by the State Board of Elections (see [http:\/\/newsblogs.chicagotribune.com\/clout_st\/2010\/08\/its-official-four-us-senate-candidates-five-for-governor.html Chicago Tribune]). Labno was the only one of the four candidates for U.S. Senate from Illinois who did not have an article. To put it in perspective, the 2008 Libertarian candidate for U.S. Senate from Illinois ([[Larry Stafford]]) also has an article. (I am still a newbie so please let me know if I've done something wrong.) Thanks!  +++$+++ In response to [[:User_talk:Cardinal91#Labno|your query]]: I added [[Michael Labno]] because the Libertarian Party was recently granted ballot access through citizen petition to the U.S. Senator election in Illinois by the State Board of Elections (see [http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/clout_st/2010/08/its-official-four-us-senate-candidates-five-for-governor.html Chicago Tribune]). Labno was the only one of the four candidates for U.S. Senate from Illinois who did not have an article. To put it in perspective, the 2008 Libertarian candidate for U.S. Senate from Illinois ([[Larry Stafford]]) also has an article. (I am still a newbie so please let me know if I've done something wrong.) Thanks! [[User:Cardinal91|Cardinal91]] ([[User talk:Cardinal91|talk]]) 03:14, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
3629 +++$+++ Cardinal91 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3628 +++$+++ 3628 +++$+++ 2010-09-16 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.284632640E09 +++$+++ Or do you mean why did I add him to the [[United States Senate elections in Illinois, 2010]] Infobox? I apologize in that I missed the 5% consensus. Labno is currently polling at 3% according to a recent [[United_States_Senate_elections_in_Illinois,_2010#Polling_3|Tribune survey]]. I will remove his name from the Infobox momentarily along with another update to that article for [[WP:NPOV]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Or do you mean why did I add him to the [[United States Senate elections in Illinois, 2010]] Infobox? I apologize in that I missed the 5% consensus. Labno is currently polling at 3% according to a recent [[United_States_Senate_elections_in_Illinois,_2010#Polling_3|Tribune survey]]. I will remove his name from the Infobox momentarily along with another update to that article for [[WP:NPOV]]. Thanks. [[User:Cardinal91|Cardinal91]] ([[User talk:Cardinal91|talk]]) 03:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

3630 +++$+++ Kiefer.Wolfowitz +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3630 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-19 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.284886800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your response! Best regards,  +++$+++ Thanks for your response! Best regards, [[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|Kiefer.Wolfowitz]] ([[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|talk]]) 02:00, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
3631 +++$+++ Kiefer.Wolfowitz +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3630 +++$+++ 3630 +++$+++ 2010-09-19 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.284887700E09 +++$+++ However, it does seem misleading to list an independent under the heading of \"minor\", and this is the reason I didn't wait for your reply here, or ask for a 3rd opinion immediately on the TALK page before restoring \"parties or independent\". Thank you again! Sincerely,  +++$+++ :However, it does seem misleading to list an independent under the heading of "minor", and this is the reason I didn't wait for your reply here, or ask for a 3rd opinion immediately on the TALK page before restoring "parties or independent". Thank you again! Sincerely, [[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|Kiefer.Wolfowitz]] ([[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|talk]]) 02:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
3632 +++$+++ Kiefer.Wolfowitz +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3630 +++$+++ 3631 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.285005300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for clarifying that \"minor\" and \"major\" refer to candidates, not parties, in your summary of your edit.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for clarifying that "minor" and "major" refer to candidates, not parties, in your summary of your edit. [[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|Kiefer.Wolfowitz]] ([[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|talk]]) 10:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

524893 +++$+++ Markles +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-07 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.128746400E09 +++$+++ You've made a great template, [[Template:UnitedStatesCode]].  It uses FindLaw.  I'm an attorney and I use and like Findlaw.  On the other hand, [http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode Cornell's site] is a lot cleaner, slicker, and more attractive to the common user & Wikipedian.  So I'm looking into trying a Template that uses Cornell's site:  [[Template:USCode]].  However, I'm not having much luck because I'm not good at this stuff.  Can you give me some advice?  You can answer here instead of my [[User talk:markles|user page]]. -- +++$+++ You've made a great template, [[Template:UnitedStatesCode]].  It uses FindLaw.  I'm an attorney and I use and like Findlaw.  On the other hand, [http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode Cornell's site] is a lot cleaner, slicker, and more attractive to the common user & Wikipedian.  So I'm looking into trying a Template that uses Cornell's site:  [[Template:USCode]].  However, I'm not having much luck because I'm not good at this stuff.  Can you give me some advice?  You can answer here instead of my [[User talk:markles|user page]]. --[[User:Markles|Mark Adler]] 21:40, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
524894 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524893 +++$+++ 524893 +++$+++ 2005-10-10 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.129000500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the kind words. I'll respond at [[Template talk:UnitedStatesCode]] instead of here, to make it easier for people to follow the discussion in the future. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the kind words. I'll respond at [[Template talk:UnitedStatesCode]] instead of here, to make it easier for people to follow the discussion in the future. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 20:15, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

527921 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-18 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.184803800E09 +++$+++ Hi. Could you please comment on the unblock request posted by [[User:Aim Here]], whom you blocked last night, for the benefit of whatever admin reviews the request. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi. Could you please comment on the unblock request posted by [[User:Aim Here]], whom you blocked last night, for the benefit of whatever admin reviews the request. Thanks, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 17:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
527922 +++$+++ Ugen64 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527921 +++$+++ 527921 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.184846580E09 +++$+++ If you do not comment in the next day or so, I am unblocking the user. I cannot find a single example of him \"trolling\" on WP:ANI, so maybe if you comment and provide a few diffs and explain where the trolling occurred (or even a brief summary of the conflict's history that I am unfortunately unaware of) that would be very helpful. Thanks,  +++$+++ *If you do not comment in the next day or so, I am unblocking the user. I cannot find a single example of him "trolling" on WP:ANI, so maybe if you comment and provide a few diffs and explain where the trolling occurred (or even a brief summary of the conflict's history that I am unfortunately unaware of) that would be very helpful. Thanks, [[User:Ugen64|ugen64]] 05:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

265778 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265778 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.163886120E09 +++$+++ I think that having redirect pages solves the problem of users ''finding'' the right page.  For example, [[Queen Elizabeth II]] is really a redirect page to [[Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom]].  Redirect pages actually ''save'' server effort.  If someone types in an alternate spelling, and no page is found, the server does a database search and returns a search page.  The user then clicks again to go to the page the user wants.  If there is a redirect page for the alternate spelling, the whole search page effort is avoided.  It is a great savings.  So, in my mind, the question about a page name is only a question about what name should appear on that page, and isn't a question about making the page accessible to users who might look for that page under a different name.  I hope that helps to clarify my position.  I hope today is a good one.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ I think that having redirect pages solves the problem of users ''finding'' the right page.  For example, [[Queen Elizabeth II]] is really a redirect page to [[Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom]].  Redirect pages actually ''save'' server effort.  If someone types in an alternate spelling, and no page is found, the server does a database search and returns a search page.  The user then clicks again to go to the page the user wants.  If there is a redirect page for the alternate spelling, the whole search page effort is avoided.  It is a great savings.  So, in my mind, the question about a page name is only a question about what name should appear on that page, and isn't a question about making the page accessible to users who might look for that page under a different name.  I hope that helps to clarify my position.  I hope today is a good one.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 13:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
265779 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265778 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.163886480E09 +++$+++ I am more interested in research and finding information. The redirects are good if you want to find an article on Wikipedia. But even in those cases, the redirects for a district send you to a town, etc. I have to go now but will be back later - I'm already late.   +++$+++ ::I am more interested in research and finding information. The redirects are good if you want to find an article on Wikipedia. But even in those cases, the redirects for a district send you to a town, etc. I have to go now but will be back later - I'm already late.  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 13:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

527923 +++$+++  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-18 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.184822820E09 +++$+++ Hi, you deleted this image as being unused and non free...well, it's being used [[My Kind of Scene|here]], and there was no notice (as far as I know) that it was going to be deleted posted anywhere.  If you could consider un-deleting (and tagging with a no-fair-use-rationale tag if you wish), it would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you, [[User_talk:Giggy|<font color=\"green\">'''Giggy'''<\/font>]] <sub>[[User:Giggy|<font color=\"red\">U<\/font>]]<\/sub><sup> +++$+++ Hi, you deleted this image as being unused and non free...well, it's being used [[My Kind of Scene|here]], and there was no notice (as far as I know) that it was going to be deleted posted anywhere.  If you could consider un-deleting (and tagging with a no-fair-use-rationale tag if you wish), it would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you, [[User_talk:Giggy|<font color="green">'''Giggy'''</font>]] <sub>[[User:Giggy|<font color="red">U</font>]]</sub><sup>[[User:Giggy/Contribs|<font color="orange">C</font>]]</sup>[[WP:FING|P]] 22:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
527924 +++$+++  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527923 +++$+++ 527923 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.184908440E09 +++$+++ Never mind, it's been uploaded again (under a different name). [[User_talk:Giggy|<font color=\"green\">'''Giggy'''<\/font>]] <sub>[[User:Giggy|<font color=\"red\">U<\/font>]]<\/sub><sup> +++$+++ :Never mind, it's been uploaded again (under a different name). [[User_talk:Giggy|<font color="green">'''Giggy'''</font>]] <sub>[[User:Giggy|<font color="red">U</font>]]</sub><sup>[[User:Giggy/Contribs|<font color="orange">C</font>]]</sup>[[WP:FING|P]] 22:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

3638 +++$+++ Flatterworld +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-26 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.285557480E09 +++$+++ No, it is '''NOT''' my job to have to do all the time-consuming research to fix up the five-second fluff articles you're busy creating from a bunch of cut-and-paste stuff. You can't even be bothered to check the grammar or make it sound the least bit encyclopedic! You have no idea how much I resent your offloading the 'donkey work' to the rest of us while you swan in and create bits of fluff intended '''only''' to get your favorite candidates elected. You've been around here far too long to be doing that by mistake or through ignorance, and your partisanship is ridiculous. Go work for a campaign office instead of Wikipedia if that's all you're interested in. Consider this an official 'cease and desist' warning.  +++$+++ No, it is '''NOT''' my job to have to do all the time-consuming research to fix up the five-second fluff articles you're busy creating from a bunch of cut-and-paste stuff. You can't even be bothered to check the grammar or make it sound the least bit encyclopedic! You have no idea how much I resent your offloading the 'donkey work' to the rest of us while you swan in and create bits of fluff intended '''only''' to get your favorite candidates elected. You've been around here far too long to be doing that by mistake or through ignorance, and your partisanship is ridiculous. Go work for a campaign office instead of Wikipedia if that's all you're interested in. Consider this an official 'cease and desist' warning. [[User:Flatterworld|Flatterworld]] ([[User talk:Flatterworld|talk]]) 20:18, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
3639 +++$+++ Flatterworld +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3638 +++$+++ 3638 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.285623900E09 +++$+++ Every article I've come across of these is of a Republican, and they're 'flattering' as opposed to being encyclopedic. With material copied from the campaign websites, that's to be expected. Whatever your intentions may or may not be, that's the result and it's not a good one.  +++$+++ :Every article I've come across of these is of a Republican, and they're 'flattering' as opposed to being encyclopedic. With material copied from the campaign websites, that's to be expected. Whatever your intentions may or may not be, that's the result and it's not a good one. [[User:Flatterworld|Flatterworld]] ([[User talk:Flatterworld|talk]]) 14:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

265783 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265783 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-19 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.164007620E09 +++$+++ At the end of the day, one has to be happy with what one is doing, so eventually its up to you. Since you started doing articles on India, I believe you have open interests about the world and should not be discouraged.( Its easy for me to write about Belur\/Halebidu and Somanathapura, only a stone throw from my paternal and maternal ancestral hometown ). Have you thought about a trip to India? You will find the people very friendly and welcoming. You will also learn about the country and be able to write bigger articles. Thanks for your contributions +++$+++ At the end of the day, one has to be happy with what one is doing, so eventually its up to you. Since you started doing articles on India, I believe you have open interests about the world and should not be discouraged.( Its easy for me to write about Belur/Halebidu and Somanathapura, only a stone throw from my paternal and maternal ancestral hometown ). Have you thought about a trip to India? You will find the people very friendly and welcoming. You will also learn about the country and be able to write bigger articles. Thanks for your contributions[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
265784 +++$+++ Michael David +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265783 +++$+++ 265783 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.164009840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Michael David|Michael David]] 00:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
265785 +++$+++ Michael David +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265783 +++$+++ 265784 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.164011940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your response. I'll do some more snooping around on him and see what I can find. --  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your response. I'll do some more snooping around on him and see what I can find. -- [[User:Michael David|Michael David]] 00:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
265786 +++$+++ Michael David +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265783 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.164061740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::[[User:Michael David|Michael David]] 14:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

3641 +++$+++ Arbor832466 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3641 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-05 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.286318220E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}<\/code> to '''the top of [[:Stephen Fincher|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or \"db\" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Stephen Fincher|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these administrators]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-bio-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom -->  +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Stephen Fincher|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Stephen Fincher|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these administrators]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-bio-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Arbor832466|Arbor832466]] ([[User talk:Arbor832466|talk]]) 15:37, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
3642 +++$+++ Arbor832466 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3641 +++$+++ 3641 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.286318520E09 +++$+++ Didn't mean to do speedy deletion. Sorry! Fixing now.  +++$+++ :Didn't mean to do speedy deletion. Sorry! Fixing now. [[User:Arbor832466|Arbor832466]] ([[User talk:Arbor832466|talk]]) 15:42, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

175370 +++$+++ Skier Dude2 +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-26 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.306406520E09 +++$+++ Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Skier Dude2|Skier Dude2]] ([[User talk:Skier Dude2|talk]]) 03:42, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
175371 +++$+++ Zundark +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175370 +++$+++ 175370 +++$+++ 2011-06-01 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.306958580E09 +++$+++ The image was in fact in use, but for some reason the link wasn't recorded in the database (e.g., it didn't show up in \"What links here\"). I fixed the problem by making a null edit on the article (null edit = edit page and save without any changes - doesn't show up in the edit history, but causes the link data to be recomputed). -- +++$+++ :The image was in fact in use, but for some reason the link wasn't recorded in the database (e.g., it didn't show up in "What links here"). I fixed the problem by making a null edit on the article (null edit = edit page and save without any changes - doesn't show up in the edit history, but causes the link data to be recomputed). --[[User:Zundark|Zundark]] ([[User talk:Zundark|talk]]) 13:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

3648 +++$+++ Arbor832466 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3648 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-05 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.286333460E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}<\/code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Arbor832466|Arbor832466]] ([[User talk:Arbor832466|talk]]) 19:51, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
3649 +++$+++ Arbor832466 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3648 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-10-07 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.286497800E09 +++$+++ I'm here (I'm a she, not a he). FYI, I've gone back and changed all of the delete templates to merges. Didn't mean to get rid of them entirely, just to put the info on the election pages, where I believe it belongs.  +++$+++ :::I'm here (I'm a she, not a he). FYI, I've gone back and changed all of the delete templates to merges. Didn't mean to get rid of them entirely, just to put the info on the election pages, where I believe it belongs. [[User:Arbor832466|Arbor832466]] ([[User talk:Arbor832466|talk]]) 17:30, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

3650 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-07 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.286497620E09 +++$+++ This is the only way I can respond and discuss all these articles that I worked so hard on to create. I can make legit arguments that all these candidates have significant media coverage. But before I talk any longer I need to know [[User talk:Arbor832466]] is listening. If you get this message please sign your name below so I know you got the message.-- +++$+++ This is the only way I can respond and discuss all these articles that I worked so hard on to create. I can make legit arguments that all these candidates have significant media coverage. But before I talk any longer I need to know [[User talk:Arbor832466]] is listening. If you get this message please sign your name below so I know you got the message.--[[User:Jerzeykydd|Jerzeykydd]] ([[User talk:Jerzeykydd#top|talk]]) 17:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
3651 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3650 +++$+++ 3650 +++$+++ 2010-10-07 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.286497980E09 +++$+++ Ok so you're telling me none of these articles have significant media coverage. Explain that to me.-- +++$+++ *Ok so you're telling me none of these articles have significant media coverage. Explain that to me.--[[User:Jerzeykydd|Jerzeykydd]] ([[User talk:Jerzeykydd#top|talk]]) 17:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
3652 +++$+++ InaMaka +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3650 +++$+++ 3651 +++$+++ 2010-10-07 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.286500920E09 +++$+++ Dear Jerzeykydd:  You ask a very good question.  Editor Arbor832466 has been attempting to have ALL of these articles either deleted, or otherwise eliminated.-- +++$+++ ::Dear Jerzeykydd:  You ask a very good question.  Editor Arbor832466 has been attempting to have ALL of these articles either deleted, or otherwise eliminated.--[[User:InaMaka|InaMaka]] ([[User talk:InaMaka|talk]]) 18:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

265796 +++$+++ Ekajati +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265796 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-21 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.164177840E09 +++$+++ Yeah, it can be pretty hard. I specialize in the Buddhist categories, and I had to think a bit to figure out what the best category would be. It might end up being moved up to [[:Category:History of Buddhism]], since it isn't a specific site. Not sure how detail oriented the person who created the Ancient sites category is (or if they are even still around...)  +++$+++ Yeah, it can be pretty hard. I specialize in the Buddhist categories, and I had to think a bit to figure out what the best category would be. It might end up being moved up to [[:Category:History of Buddhism]], since it isn't a specific site. Not sure how detail oriented the person who created the Ancient sites category is (or if they are even still around...) [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] ([[User talk:Ekajati|yakity-yak]]) 22:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
265797 +++$+++ Ekajati +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265796 +++$+++ 265796 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.164178740E09 +++$+++ The general vertical rule is to traverse the tree downward to find the most specific subcategory appropriate to the article, put it  there, and in general, it is not put in any of the supercategories as well, unless it is a very important central concept of some sort, I guess.  +++$+++ :The general vertical rule is to traverse the tree downward to find the most specific subcategory appropriate to the article, put it  there, and in general, it is not put in any of the supercategories as well, unless it is a very important central concept of some sort, I guess. [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] ([[User talk:Ekajati|yakity-yak]]) 22:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
265798 +++$+++ Ekajati +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265796 +++$+++ 265797 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.164180360E09 +++$+++ Yes, putting into multiple subcategories like that is actually ok, as long as they are not ''also'' dumped in [[:Category:Song]] (if there were one). ''too''.  +++$+++ ::Yes, putting into multiple subcategories like that is actually ok, as long as they are not ''also'' dumped in [[:Category:Song]] (if there were one). ''too''. [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] ([[User talk:Ekajati|yakity-yak]]) 23:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

527941 +++$+++ CoolMike +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527941 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-17 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.184732400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for any reply.   +++$+++ Thanks for any reply.  [[User:CoolMike|CoolMike]] 21:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
527942 +++$+++ CoolMike +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527941 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.184743020E09 +++$+++ Sorry about my somewhat angry tone earlyer... I have since discovered that the issue is a little thornier than I had thought.  The image was from the smithsonian institution, which is funded by the US federal government.  They have a long copywrite notice here: [http:\/\/smithsonianimages.si.edu\/siphoto\/siphoto.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=content&contentpath=copyright.html|SI copywright notice]  The image that I want to re-upload is here: [http:\/\/americanhistory.si.edu\/collections\/toolbox\/toolpicsb\/masonic.jpg|picture].  Maybee you can help me make sence of this.  According to the SI web site I should be able to use it as wikipedia is a non-profit, educational web site.  I gather that there is some conflicting policies from the [[Smithsonian Institution]] about this sort of thing. Check out that wikilink for info.  It seems to me like the image is good to be used in wikipedia, but I figured I'd ask your opinion and read up on the wikipedia policies a little more before uploading any more images from the smithsonian.   +++$+++ ::Sorry about my somewhat angry tone earlyer... I have since discovered that the issue is a little thornier than I had thought.  The image was from the smithsonian institution, which is funded by the US federal government.  They have a long copywrite notice here: [http://smithsonianimages.si.edu/siphoto/siphoto.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=content&contentpath=copyright.html|SI copywright notice]  The image that I want to re-upload is here: [http://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/toolbox/toolpicsb/masonic.jpg|picture].  Maybee you can help me make sence of this.  According to the SI web site I should be able to use it as wikipedia is a non-profit, educational web site.  I gather that there is some conflicting policies from the [[Smithsonian Institution]] about this sort of thing. Check out that wikilink for info.  It seems to me like the image is good to be used in wikipedia, but I figured I'd ask your opinion and read up on the wikipedia policies a little more before uploading any more images from the smithsonian.  [[User:CoolMike|CoolMike]] 00:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
527943 +++$+++ CoolMike +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527941 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.184746920E09 +++$+++ There seems to be some contradictions on the wikipedia policy regarding the use of \"Fair Use\" images.  See [[wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content]] (towards the end of the page) and [[wikipedia:non-free content]] (the section entitled \"Down stream content\".  In my opinion the article in question warrents the use of a fair-use image becuase there is no other easily available public domain image.  I have looked around pretty extensively for a picture of Henry O. Studley, or his tool chest that is public domain, and I was unable to find any.  The tool chest is currently in the possession of a private and annonymous collector, and so it is unlikely that a free use image is going to turn up any time soon.  Henry O. Studley him is deceased.  This leads to a quandry, as there are only fair use images for the article.  These images would add a great deal to the article.  Also they are not expressely forbidden by the wikipedia policies.  Is there any due process for appealing a speedy deletion?  The more I read about wikipedia policy the more dissatisfied I become with the contradictory and ambiguous nature of the policies.  A simple vote or something would be much more satisfying to me than trolling through some of these really porely worded guideline pages.  Thanks for your feedback by the way  +++$+++ :::: There seems to be some contradictions on the wikipedia policy regarding the use of "Fair Use" images.  See [[wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content]] (towards the end of the page) and [[wikipedia:non-free content]] (the section entitled "Down stream content".  In my opinion the article in question warrents the use of a fair-use image becuase there is no other easily available public domain image.  I have looked around pretty extensively for a picture of Henry O. Studley, or his tool chest that is public domain, and I was unable to find any.  The tool chest is currently in the possession of a private and annonymous collector, and so it is unlikely that a free use image is going to turn up any time soon.  Henry O. Studley him is deceased.  This leads to a quandry, as there are only fair use images for the article.  These images would add a great deal to the article.  Also they are not expressely forbidden by the wikipedia policies.  Is there any due process for appealing a speedy deletion?  The more I read about wikipedia policy the more dissatisfied I become with the contradictory and ambiguous nature of the policies.  A simple vote or something would be much more satisfying to me than trolling through some of these really porely worded guideline pages.  Thanks for your feedback by the way [[User:CoolMike|CoolMike]] 01:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
527944 +++$+++ CoolMike +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527941 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.184907060E09 +++$+++ '''Please respond'''  +++$+++ ::::'''Please respond''' [[User:CoolMike|CoolMike]] 21:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

3656 +++$+++ Bobrayner +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-12 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.286878560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Bobrayner|bobrayner]] ([[User talk:Bobrayner|talk]]) 03:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
3657 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3656 +++$+++ 3656 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.286884800E09 +++$+++ I can't find the \"''email this user''\" button. I'm concerned. Do you have any idea why?-- +++$+++ *I can't find the "''email this user''" button. I'm concerned. Do you have any idea why?--[[User:Jerzeykydd|Jerzeykydd]] ([[User talk:Jerzeykydd#top|talk]]) 05:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
3658 +++$+++ Bobrayner +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3656 +++$+++ 3657 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.286900880E09 +++$+++ It should be in a toolbox on the left hand side of the screen. That's odd. I just sent you an email with my address in anyway.  +++$+++ :*It should be in a toolbox on the left hand side of the screen. That's odd. I just sent you an email with my address in anyway. [[User:Bobrayner|bobrayner]] ([[User talk:Bobrayner|talk]]) 09:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
3659 +++$+++ Namiba +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3656 +++$+++ 3657 +++$+++ 2010-11-08 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.289255880E09 +++$+++ Before you go and get yourself banned again, why don't you discuss the issue further on the talk page? Please do not be a disruptive editor on this issue any longer.-- +++$+++ ::Before you go and get yourself banned again, why don't you discuss the issue further on the talk page? Please do not be a disruptive editor on this issue any longer.--[[User:Namiba|TM]] 14:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

265801 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-22 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.164261600E09 +++$+++ Your father would bring home liquid nitrogen in a thermos?  Heavens.  I don't think I've actually seen liquid nitrogen except in science films.  I remember the instructor on the film dipped a peeled banana in liquid nitrogen, then hammered a nail into a piece of wood with the banana!  Have a good thanksgiving!  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Your father would bring home liquid nitrogen in a thermos?  Heavens.  I don't think I've actually seen liquid nitrogen except in science films.  I remember the instructor on the film dipped a peeled banana in liquid nitrogen, then hammered a nail into a piece of wood with the banana!  Have a good thanksgiving!  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
265802 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265801 +++$+++ 265801 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.164680760E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  Please do not imagine that I am put off.  You are certainly my dear friend, and I am honored if you count me among your friends.  I understand why you have chosen to stop editting India related articles.  Although I value the contributions you have made to India related articles, I am sure that contributions to other areas of the encyclopedia can be equally fulfilling if not more so.  Please keep in touch.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :Hi Mattisse.  Please do not imagine that I am put off.  You are certainly my dear friend, and I am honored if you count me among your friends.  I understand why you have chosen to stop editting India related articles.  Although I value the contributions you have made to India related articles, I am sure that contributions to other areas of the encyclopedia can be equally fulfilling if not more so.  Please keep in touch.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
265803 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265801 +++$+++ 265802 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.164748020E09 +++$+++ No problem on [[Andrew Cohen]].  I am glad that you didn't mind that I gave an opinion that may not be yours.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::No problem on [[Andrew Cohen]].  I am glad that you didn't mind that I gave an opinion that may not be yours.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 13:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
265804 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265801 +++$+++ 265803 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.164786300E09 +++$+++ Hi, I didn't see your summary message until just now.  I've been away from the internet all day, and only have a minute right now.  I hope to have some time in an hour or two.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::Hi, I didn't see your summary message until just now.  I've been away from the internet all day, and only have a minute right now.  I hope to have some time in an hour or two.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

3662 +++$+++ Hunter Kahn +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3662 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-07 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.289197080E09 +++$+++ Hey Jerzeykydd. Thanks for weighing in on my question about splitting the Sestak\/Specter PA primary into a separate article. I agree with you, and the more I work on it the more I'm convinced it's the best choice. I wanted to let you know that, in case you were interested, I've started work on it [[User:Hunter Kahn\/United States Senate Democratic primary in Pennsylvania, 2010|in my userspace]]. I know it looks long, but that's because I want to ensure it's comprehensive as I don't plan to move it to the mainspace until it's GA-ready. I think it will be a tremendous informational resource once it's done. If you have any thoughts, please feel free to share them. Thanks again! \u2014 <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">Hun<\/font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">ter<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Hunter_Kahn|<font color=\"#595454\">Ka<\/font>]] +++$+++ Hey Jerzeykydd. Thanks for weighing in on my question about splitting the Sestak/Specter PA primary into a separate article. I agree with you, and the more I work on it the more I'm convinced it's the best choice. I wanted to let you know that, in case you were interested, I've started work on it [[User:Hunter Kahn/United States Senate Democratic primary in Pennsylvania, 2010|in my userspace]]. I know it looks long, but that's because I want to ensure it's comprehensive as I don't plan to move it to the mainspace until it's GA-ready. I think it will be a tremendous informational resource once it's done. If you have any thoughts, please feel free to share them. Thanks again! — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 22:18, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
3663 +++$+++ Hunter Kahn +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3662 +++$+++ 3662 +++$+++ 2010-11-07 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.289200500E09 +++$+++ Thanks much. I'll give you an update when I'm finished and move it out into the mainspace. \u2014 <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">Hun<\/font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">ter<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Hunter_Kahn|<font color=\"#595454\">Ka<\/font>]] +++$+++ *Thanks much. I'll give you an update when I'm finished and move it out into the mainspace. — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 23:15, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

527951 +++$+++ AuburnPilot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527951 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-25 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.185431280E09 +++$+++ Is anything progressing with this mediation? A user has placed a request on [[WP:RPP]] to have the protection removed from [[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]], but as it was protected with the statement \"until med case is solved\" I am hesitant to remove protection. If, however, nothing is to come from the mediation, I would like to remove protection from this article (it has been two months). Since you're listed as the one heading this case, I figured you'd know. -  +++$+++ Is anything progressing with this mediation? A user has placed a request on [[WP:RPP]] to have the protection removed from [[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]], but as it was protected with the statement "until med case is solved" I am hesitant to remove protection. If, however, nothing is to come from the mediation, I would like to remove protection from this article (it has been two months). Since you're listed as the one heading this case, I figured you'd know. - [[User:AuburnPilot|<font color="#0000cd">auburn</font><font color="#EF6521">pilot</font>]] [[User_talk:AuburnPilot|<small>talk</small>]] 23:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
527952 +++$+++ AuburnPilot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527951 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.185433800E09 +++$+++ Thanks, ^demon. I left Daniel a note.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Daniel&diff=147113044&oldid=147060788] -  +++$+++ ::Thanks, ^demon. I left Daniel a note.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Daniel&diff=147113044&oldid=147060788] - [[User:AuburnPilot|<font color="#0000cd">auburn</font><font color="#EF6521">pilot</font>]] [[User_talk:AuburnPilot|<small>talk</small>]] 00:10, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

3666 +++$+++ Hunter Kahn +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-15 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.289812860E09 +++$+++ Respectfully, I wish you had not gone ahead and created the article, or at least had asked me first. Partially because I am nearly finished, but wanted to wait until I was entirely finished before I moved it into the mainspace. But mainly, I've done a lot of edits (78, to be exact) on the [[User:Hunter Kahn\/United States Senate Democratic primary in Pennsylvania, 2010|article currently in my sandbox]], which I planned to ''move'' to the main article when I was finished, that way the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Hunter_Kahn\/United_States_Senate_Democratic_primary_in_Pennsylvania,_2010&action=history article history] would be preserved. I've made various cuts and changes along the way, and if the history had been preserved, those edits would be documented in the history so anybody could check back on the old content if need be. As it stands now, I'll probably just end up having to delete my sandbox page, which will destroy the article history and destroy those edits from my own edit count. Not a big deal, but still... \u2014 <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">Hun<\/font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">ter<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Hunter_Kahn|<font color=\"#595454\">Ka<\/font>]] +++$+++ Respectfully, I wish you had not gone ahead and created the article, or at least had asked me first. Partially because I am nearly finished, but wanted to wait until I was entirely finished before I moved it into the mainspace. But mainly, I've done a lot of edits (78, to be exact) on the [[User:Hunter Kahn/United States Senate Democratic primary in Pennsylvania, 2010|article currently in my sandbox]], which I planned to ''move'' to the main article when I was finished, that way the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Hunter_Kahn/United_States_Senate_Democratic_primary_in_Pennsylvania,_2010&action=history article history] would be preserved. I've made various cuts and changes along the way, and if the history had been preserved, those edits would be documented in the history so anybody could check back on the old content if need be. As it stands now, I'll probably just end up having to delete my sandbox page, which will destroy the article history and destroy those edits from my own edit count. Not a big deal, but still... — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 01:21, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
3667 +++$+++ Hunter Kahn +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3666 +++$+++ 3666 +++$+++ 2010-11-15 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.289812980E09 +++$+++ Actually, would you mind if I asked an administrator to delete the current mainstream page, then allow move my sandbox page into it? In other words, delete [[United States Senate Democratic primary in Pennsylvania, 2010|this]] and replace it with [[User:Hunter Kahn\/United States Senate Democratic primary in Pennsylvania, 2010|this]]? The content would be the same, but this way the article history would be preserved. Let me know if you're cool with it. \u2014 <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">Hun<\/font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">ter<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Hunter_Kahn|<font color=\"#595454\">Ka<\/font>]] +++$+++ *Actually, would you mind if I asked an administrator to delete the current mainstream page, then allow move my sandbox page into it? In other words, delete [[United States Senate Democratic primary in Pennsylvania, 2010|this]] and replace it with [[User:Hunter Kahn/United States Senate Democratic primary in Pennsylvania, 2010|this]]? The content would be the same, but this way the article history would be preserved. Let me know if you're cool with it. — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 01:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
3668 +++$+++ Hunter Kahn +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3666 +++$+++ 3667 +++$+++ 2010-11-15 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.289814000E09 +++$+++ Perfect. I much appreciate it, Jerzeykydd! I was probably overly worried about it in the first place, but I feel a lot more comfortable having that article history preserved. Thanks again for setting it all up! By the way, do you review GAN articles? Because I plan on nominating this bad boy for GA when I'm finished (which should be within the week) and given your interest in this and in election articles, you'd be the perfect reviewer if you're interested... \u2014 <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">Hun<\/font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">ter<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Hunter_Kahn|<font color=\"#595454\">Ka<\/font>]] +++$+++ **Perfect. I much appreciate it, Jerzeykydd! I was probably overly worried about it in the first place, but I feel a lot more comfortable having that article history preserved. Thanks again for setting it all up! By the way, do you review GAN articles? Because I plan on nominating this bad boy for GA when I'm finished (which should be within the week) and given your interest in this and in election articles, you'd be the perfect reviewer if you're interested... — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 01:40, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
3669 +++$+++ Hunter Kahn +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3666 +++$+++ 3668 +++$+++ 2010-11-15 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.289814180E09 +++$+++ You certainly don't have to do it, it'll get reviewed by somebody else at some point, and I'm not ready to nominate it yet anyway. I just didn't know if you were a regular GAN reviewer or not. :) \u2014 <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">Hun<\/font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">ter<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Hunter_Kahn|<font color=\"#595454\">Ka<\/font>]] +++$+++ ***You certainly don't have to do it, it'll get reviewed by somebody else at some point, and I'm not ready to nominate it yet anyway. I just didn't know if you were a regular GAN reviewer or not. :) — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 01:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

393827 +++$+++ IGeMiNix +++$+++ AMLNet49 +++$+++ 393827 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-23 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.287817200E09 +++$+++ Hi, I understand your [[WP:AF|good faith edits]], however, even during the use of <A>, the A trains that were signed up to Rockaway Park never used the diamond rollsigns, they all used the regular circle (A) ones. Also, you cited that MTA.info is a source, however, the current revision no longer uses the <A> therefore, we can say that it is no longer used. The only diamond rollsigns that are used in service currently is the <6> and <7>.--<font face=\"Bradley Hand ITC\"> +++$+++ Hi, I understand your [[WP:AF|good faith edits]], however, even during the use of <A>, the A trains that were signed up to Rockaway Park never used the diamond rollsigns, they all used the regular circle (A) ones. Also, you cited that MTA.info is a source, however, the current revision no longer uses the <A> therefore, we can say that it is no longer used. The only diamond rollsigns that are used in service currently is the <6> and <7>.--<font face="Bradley Hand ITC">[[User:IGeMiNix|<font color="#2A7ECF">iGeM</font>]][[User talk:IGeMiNix|<font color="33FF00">iN</font>]][[Special:Contributions/IGeMiNix|<font color="#CC14CC">ix</font>]]</font> 00:00, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
393828 +++$+++ IGeMiNix +++$+++ AMLNet49 +++$+++ 393827 +++$+++ 393827 +++$+++ 2010-10-23 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.287873000E09 +++$+++ Sure, hopefully we can have a consensus soon.--<font face=\"Bradley Hand ITC\"> +++$+++ :Sure, hopefully we can have a consensus soon.--<font face="Bradley Hand ITC">[[User:IGeMiNix|<font color="#2A7ECF">iGeM</font>]][[User talk:IGeMiNix|<font color="33FF00">iN</font>]][[Special:Contributions/IGeMiNix|<font color="#CC14CC">ix</font>]]</font> 15:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

3670 +++$+++ Hekerui +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.289897520E09 +++$+++ Hi, I nominated the image for deletion because it is not a work of the federal government but Coons' campaign and there is no other evidence it is available under a free license. Please make sure to always check image copyright and don't assume every portrait of a federal government employee (Coons wasn't when this was shot) is free.  +++$+++ Hi, I nominated the image for deletion because it is not a work of the federal government but Coons' campaign and there is no other evidence it is available under a free license. Please make sure to always check image copyright and don't assume every portrait of a federal government employee (Coons wasn't when this was shot) is free. [[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 00:52, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
3671 +++$+++ Hekerui +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3670 +++$+++ 3670 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.289899020E09 +++$+++ The same is true for [[:File:Tom Graves.jpg]].  +++$+++ :The same is true for [[:File:Tom Graves.jpg]]. [[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 01:17, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

3672 +++$+++ Hekerui +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.289899740E09 +++$+++ Hi Jerzeykydd, you need to provide evidence that something was released in the public domain. I couldn't find any in the source links. The Tom Graves page clearly states \"Copyright \xa92009-2010 Graves for Congress\". Simply linking the template is not good enough. You seem to assume that a portrait used by a Congressperson on his\/her website is \"official\" and therefore released in the public domain - this is false. And please don't warning-template my talk page, the Tom Clements source image lacks evidence of permission and the derivative work does too - the remedy is providing evidence these images are free. Regards  +++$+++ Hi Jerzeykydd, you need to provide evidence that something was released in the public domain. I couldn't find any in the source links. The Tom Graves page clearly states "Copyright ©2009-2010 Graves for Congress". Simply linking the template is not good enough. You seem to assume that a portrait used by a Congressperson on his/her website is "official" and therefore released in the public domain - this is false. And please don't warning-template my talk page, the Tom Clements source image lacks evidence of permission and the derivative work does too - the remedy is providing evidence these images are free. Regards [[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 01:29, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
3673 +++$+++ Hekerui +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3672 +++$+++ 3672 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.289900640E09 +++$+++ No, they are not automatically free. To be in the public domain as federal government work they must be taken by a federal government employee during the course of the person's official duties. For example [[:File:Neil Abercrombie, 109th Pictorial photo.jpg]] is a work of the federal government and listed in the Congressional Pictorial Directory. The two images of Coons and Graves are campaign images and cannot be assumend to be free. Both will surely get official Congress images soon because they will start working soon (well, Coons already is). To get copyrighted images released we have to ask the copyright holder. For example, I asked a candidate for New York State Senate named Andrew Russo to release an image for his Wiki page under a specific free license, he agreed, I uploaded the image to [[:File:Andrew Russo portrait.jpg]], and he sent a \"[[:commons:Commons:OTRS#Declaration of consent for all enquiries|Declaration of consent for all enquiries]]\" to state that he understood the terms of the license and to prove he had given permission. It's work but often successful. Best wishes  +++$+++ :No, they are not automatically free. To be in the public domain as federal government work they must be taken by a federal government employee during the course of the person's official duties. For example [[:File:Neil Abercrombie, 109th Pictorial photo.jpg]] is a work of the federal government and listed in the Congressional Pictorial Directory. The two images of Coons and Graves are campaign images and cannot be assumend to be free. Both will surely get official Congress images soon because they will start working soon (well, Coons already is). To get copyrighted images released we have to ask the copyright holder. For example, I asked a candidate for New York State Senate named Andrew Russo to release an image for his Wiki page under a specific free license, he agreed, I uploaded the image to [[:File:Andrew Russo portrait.jpg]], and he sent a "[[:commons:Commons:OTRS#Declaration of consent for all enquiries|Declaration of consent for all enquiries]]" to state that he understood the terms of the license and to prove he had given permission. It's work but often successful. Best wishes [[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 01:44, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

3675 +++$+++ Namiba +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.289948700E09 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd, I might take your \"ownership\" warning if you hadn't been blocked for edit-warring and issuing personal attacks against me. I'd appreciate if you left the serious issues to uninvolved editors.-- +++$+++ Jerzeykydd, I might take your "ownership" warning if you hadn't been blocked for edit-warring and issuing personal attacks against me. I'd appreciate if you left the serious issues to uninvolved editors.--[[User:Namiba|TM]] 15:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
3676 +++$+++ Namiba +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3675 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.289949060E09 +++$+++ It is very inappropriate to revert an editor on their own talk page. I have reported this disruptive behavior back to the admin who blocked you before. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Toddst1#Jerzeykydd_again]-- +++$+++ ::It is very inappropriate to revert an editor on their own talk page. I have reported this disruptive behavior back to the admin who blocked you before. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Toddst1#Jerzeykydd_again]--[[User:Namiba|TM]] 15:11, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

265820 +++$+++ Kathryn_NicDhàna +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265820 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.164807900E09 +++$+++ I am sorry you are feeling so beaten down.  I still have some hope for the mediation process now that the absent mediator will be replaced.  But I understand if you need a break.  It has been tiring and ugly, and you worked very hard for no immediate result.  At this point, whatever happens with the mediation, I think people are just going ahead and getting Rosencomet's spam and non-notable articles deleted.  We don't need to wait on mediation to do that.  I would have helped with this sooner, but only came across it fairly recently.  Again, all sympathies for the struggle you have been through. -- +++$+++ I am sorry you are feeling so beaten down.  I still have some hope for the mediation process now that the absent mediator will be replaced.  But I understand if you need a break.  It has been tiring and ugly, and you worked very hard for no immediate result.  At this point, whatever happens with the mediation, I think people are just going ahead and getting Rosencomet's spam and non-notable articles deleted.  We don't need to wait on mediation to do that.  I would have helped with this sooner, but only came across it fairly recently.  Again, all sympathies for the struggle you have been through. --[[User:Kathryn NicDhàna|Kathryn NicDhàna]] [[User_talk:Kathryn NicDhàna|♫]]<font color="navy">♦</font>[[Special:Contributions/Kathryn_NicDhàna|♫]] 05:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265821 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265820 +++$+++ 265820 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.164809340E09 +++$+++ I wish I could have your hope and I appreciate your kind words. However, this has been going on since August, administratior have burned out, I have been subjected to vicious attacks, people I respected have backed   out. I no longer have any hope. It's not going to stop. There is some underlying adjenda   that condones Rosencomet and there is nothing to be done about it. It was a mistake on my part to get involved. But I  thank you. Maybe you are stronger than I am and more politically knowledable. I  am not and I fail. This is it for me. I will just concentrate on writing which is really  what I enjoy and ignore the rest. I'm learning to just leave when other take over and [[WP:OWN]] whatever. I'm learning to never look back or care what happens -- just move on to an unpopular article like [[Haitian Revolution]] and work in peace. If hat gets hot, move on and have no investments in accuracy or anything else. It is not worth the battles and there is no support despite the polocies and guidlines. Thank you so much for your message. I have only one friend here, so it's nice  to get a kind message.  I hope I am not letting you down. Sinceely,  +++$+++ :I wish I could have your hope and I appreciate your kind words. However, this has been going on since August, administratior have burned out, I have been subjected to vicious attacks, people I respected have backed   out. I no longer have any hope. It's not going to stop. There is some underlying adjenda   that condones Rosencomet and there is nothing to be done about it. It was a mistake on my part to get involved. But I  thank you. Maybe you are stronger than I am and more politically knowledable. I  am not and I fail. This is it for me. I will just concentrate on writing which is really  what I enjoy and ignore the rest. I'm learning to just leave when other take over and [[WP:OWN]] whatever. I'm learning to never look back or care what happens -- just move on to an unpopular article like [[Haitian Revolution]] and work in peace. If hat gets hot, move on and have no investments in accuracy or anything else. It is not worth the battles and there is no support despite the polocies and guidlines. Thank you so much for your message. I have only one friend here, so it's nice  to get a kind message.  I hope I am not letting you down. Sinceely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 06:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

3677 +++$+++ Hunter Kahn +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3677 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.289966640E09 +++$+++ Hey Jerzeykydd! Just so you know, I've finished the work I'd hoped to do on [[United States Senate Democratic primary election in Pennsylvania, 2010]], and I've nominated it for GAN. Although I know you don't review good article nominations, I'd definitely encourage you to take a gander at the article if you don't mind and make sure there aren't any major items that need to be fixed or changed. Also, I'd encourage you to take a look at a [[Talk:United States Senate Democratic primary election in Pennsylvania, 2010#Purpose|discussion]] that has been stated on the talk page and weigh in there, if you don't mind. And, last but not least, I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=United_States_Senate_election_in_Pennsylvania,_2010&diff=397161886&oldid=397113726 made some changes] to the main election article that I felt better embodied the ''entire'' primary, so if you wanted to take a look at that, feel free. Thanks much, Jerzeykydd, and thanks again for all your help along the way! \u2014 <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">Hun<\/font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">ter<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Hunter_Kahn|<font color=\"#595454\">Ka<\/font>]] +++$+++ Hey Jerzeykydd! Just so you know, I've finished the work I'd hoped to do on [[United States Senate Democratic primary election in Pennsylvania, 2010]], and I've nominated it for GAN. Although I know you don't review good article nominations, I'd definitely encourage you to take a gander at the article if you don't mind and make sure there aren't any major items that need to be fixed or changed. Also, I'd encourage you to take a look at a [[Talk:United States Senate Democratic primary election in Pennsylvania, 2010#Purpose|discussion]] that has been stated on the talk page and weigh in there, if you don't mind. And, last but not least, I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_Senate_election_in_Pennsylvania,_2010&diff=397161886&oldid=397113726 made some changes] to the main election article that I felt better embodied the ''entire'' primary, so if you wanted to take a look at that, feel free. Thanks much, Jerzeykydd, and thanks again for all your help along the way! — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 20:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
3678 +++$+++ Hunter Kahn +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3677 +++$+++ 3677 +++$+++ 2010-11-18 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.290072420E09 +++$+++ Done. Thanks! \u2014 <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">Hun<\/font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color=\"#C0C0C0\">ter<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Hunter_Kahn|<font color=\"#595454\">Ka<\/font>]] +++$+++ *Done. Thanks! — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 01:27, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

3679 +++$+++ Cadwallader +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-17 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.290035280E09 +++$+++ You've been doing this for a long time. What is the procedure to follow when the politician's staff keep sanitizing the page to remove voting history they dislike?  +++$+++ You've been doing this for a long time. What is the procedure to follow when the politician's staff keep sanitizing the page to remove voting history they dislike? [[User:Cadwallader|Cadwallader]] ([[User talk:Cadwallader|talk]]) 15:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
3680 +++$+++ Rms125a@hotmail.com +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3679 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-18 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.290071580E09 +++$+++ Hi. Why did you remove the following text, as per this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Morgan_Griffith&diff=cur&oldid=397349009 '''diff''']?  +++$+++ :: Hi. Why did you remove the following text, as per this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morgan_Griffith&diff=cur&oldid=397349009 '''diff''']? [[User:Rms125a@hotmail.com|Rms125a@hotmail.com]] ([[User talk:Rms125a@hotmail.com|talk]]) 01:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

265825 +++$+++ Kathryn_NicDhàna +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.164807900E09 +++$+++ I am sorry you are feeling so beaten down.  I still have some hope for the mediation process now that the absent mediator will be replaced.  But I understand if you need a break.  It has been tiring and ugly, and you worked very hard for no immediate result.  At this point, whatever happens with the mediation, I think people are just going ahead and getting Rosencomet's spam and non-notable articles deleted.  We don't need to wait on mediation to do that.  I would have helped with this sooner, but only came across it fairly recently.  Again, all sympathies for the struggle you have been through. -- +++$+++ I am sorry you are feeling so beaten down.  I still have some hope for the mediation process now that the absent mediator will be replaced.  But I understand if you need a break.  It has been tiring and ugly, and you worked very hard for no immediate result.  At this point, whatever happens with the mediation, I think people are just going ahead and getting Rosencomet's spam and non-notable articles deleted.  We don't need to wait on mediation to do that.  I would have helped with this sooner, but only came across it fairly recently.  Again, all sympathies for the struggle you have been through. --[[User:Kathryn NicDhàna|Kathryn NicDhàna]] [[User_talk:Kathryn NicDhàna|♫]]<font color="navy">♦</font>[[Special:Contributions/Kathryn_NicDhàna|♫]] 05:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265826 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265825 +++$+++ 265825 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.164809340E09 +++$+++ I wish I could have your hope and I appreciate your kind words. However, this has been going on since August, administratior have burned out, I have been subjected to vicious attacks, people I respected have backed   out. I no longer have any hope. It's not going to stop. There is some underlying adjenda   that condones Rosencomet and there is nothing to be done about it. It was a mistake on my part to get involved. But I  thank you. Maybe you are stronger than I am and more politically knowledable. I  am not and I fail. This is it for me. I will just concentrate on writing which is really  what I enjoy and ignore the rest. I'm learning to just leave when other take over and [[WP:OWN]] whatever. I'm learning to never look back or care what happens -- just move on to an unpopular article like [[Haitian Revolution]] and work in peace. If hat gets hot, move on and have no investments in accuracy or anything else. It is not worth the battles and there is no support despite the polocies and guidlines. Thank you so much for your message. I have only one friend here, so it's nice  to get a kind message.  I hope I am not letting you down. Sinceely,  +++$+++ :I wish I could have your hope and I appreciate your kind words. However, this has been going on since August, administratior have burned out, I have been subjected to vicious attacks, people I respected have backed   out. I no longer have any hope. It's not going to stop. There is some underlying adjenda   that condones Rosencomet and there is nothing to be done about it. It was a mistake on my part to get involved. But I  thank you. Maybe you are stronger than I am and more politically knowledable. I  am not and I fail. This is it for me. I will just concentrate on writing which is really  what I enjoy and ignore the rest. I'm learning to just leave when other take over and [[WP:OWN]] whatever. I'm learning to never look back or care what happens -- just move on to an unpopular article like [[Haitian Revolution]] and work in peace. If hat gets hot, move on and have no investments in accuracy or anything else. It is not worth the battles and there is no support despite the polocies and guidlines. Thank you so much for your message. I have only one friend here, so it's nice  to get a kind message.  I hope I am not letting you down. Sinceely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 06:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

527970 +++$+++ ElectricTurahk +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-29 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.185774060E09 +++$+++ I'd just like to know why you're deleting a shit load of the BIONICLE-related images when they -all- have fair use rationale.  An example being [[:Image:Avak.jpg]].  We went through a lot of trouble fighting to keep them up in the first place, and then creating fair use rationale - and I didn't even do much of that, because I was fed up with trying to keep them up.  I don't want [[User:Drakhan|Drakhan's]] work to have been for nothing. -- +++$+++ I'd just like to know why you're deleting a shit load of the BIONICLE-related images when they -all- have fair use rationale.  An example being [[:Image:Avak.jpg]].  We went through a lot of trouble fighting to keep them up in the first place, and then creating fair use rationale - and I didn't even do much of that, because I was fed up with trying to keep them up.  I don't want [[User:Drakhan|Drakhan's]] work to have been for nothing. --[[User:ElectricTurahk|<font color="#D9C830">~|ET|~</font>]](<sup>[[User talk:ElectricTurahk|<font color="#EFDC35">'''Talk'''</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/ElectricTurahk|<font color="#EFDC35">'''Contribs'''</font>]]</sup>) 22:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
527971 +++$+++ DeadBot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527970 +++$+++ 527970 +++$+++ 2007-07-30 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.185790680E09 +++$+++ They need several things - A fair use rational, a source, and to be used. That image was used, and had a fair use rational, but was deleted under I4: It did not have a source. It was tagged for more than 7 days, in which time someone could have fixed it. It's not hard to say where it came from. [[User:TheFearow|Matt\/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions\/TheFearow|(Contribs)]]  +++$+++ :They need several things - A fair use rational, a source, and to be used. That image was used, and had a fair use rational, but was deleted under I4: It did not have a source. It was tagged for more than 7 days, in which time someone could have fixed it. It's not hard to say where it came from. [[User:TheFearow|Matt/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/TheFearow|(Contribs)]] [[User:DeadBot|(Bot)]]</small> 03:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

3684 +++$+++ Bwilkins +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-26 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.290762120E09 +++$+++ In [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AToddst1&action=historysubmit&diff=397184676&oldid=397175232 this thread] you were warned to leave Namiba alone, permanently. You were advised - and SAW - ''\"if you need to message each other re:rules, ask an admin to do it directly\"''. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANamiba&action=historysubmit&diff=398879739&oldid=398874039 This was a clear breach] of that. As such, the harassment is now stopped for at least a month. ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">talk\u2192<\/font>]]<span style=\"border:1px solid black;\">'''&nbsp; +++$+++ In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AToddst1&action=historysubmit&diff=397184676&oldid=397175232 this thread] you were warned to leave Namiba alone, permanently. You were advised - and SAW - ''"if you need to message each other re:rules, ask an admin to do it directly"''. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANamiba&action=historysubmit&diff=398879739&oldid=398874039 This was a clear breach] of that. As such, the harassment is now stopped for at least a month. ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">'''&nbsp;[[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]]&nbsp;'''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</font>]]) 01:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
3685 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3684 +++$+++ 3684 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.290762300E09 +++$+++ When did you say \"if you need to message each other re:rules, ask an admin to do it directly\"?-- +++$+++ :When did you say "if you need to message each other re:rules, ask an admin to do it directly"?--[[User:Jerzeykydd|Jerzeykydd]] ([[User talk:Jerzeykydd#top|talk]]) 01:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
3686 +++$+++ Bwilkins +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3684 +++$+++ 3685 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.290762480E09 +++$+++ Um, in that thread.  Read the ''whole'' thread again.  You replied to it the first time, so you read it at least once. ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">talk\u2192<\/font>]]<span style=\"border:1px solid black;\">'''&nbsp; +++$+++ :: Um, in that thread.  Read the ''whole'' thread again.  You replied to it the first time, so you read it at least once. ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">'''&nbsp;[[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]]&nbsp;'''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</font>]]) 01:08, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
3687 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3684 +++$+++ 3686 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.290762840E09 +++$+++ Ok, I missed the part about \"if you need to message each other re:rules, ask an admin to do it directly.\" In addition, I didn't know you wanted me to stay off permanently. After a week or two, I thought it would be ok to warn Namiba of how he was breaking wikipedia rules. I'm sorry. The one month ban is very harsh. I love editing wikipedia and I make contributive edits everyday.-- +++$+++ :::Ok, I missed the part about "if you need to message each other re:rules, ask an admin to do it directly." In addition, I didn't know you wanted me to stay off permanently. After a week or two, I thought it would be ok to warn Namiba of how he was breaking wikipedia rules. I'm sorry. The one month ban is very harsh. I love editing wikipedia and I make contributive edits everyday.--[[User:Jerzeykydd|Jerzeykydd]] ([[User talk:Jerzeykydd#top|talk]]) 01:14, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
3688 +++$+++ Bwilkins +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3684 +++$+++ 3687 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.290802260E09 +++$+++ Which part of \"''You have both been advised now, and any future interactions on each other's talkpage will lead to escalation to me''\" was the most challenging?  The words \"any future interactions\" appears pretty straightforward and clearly non-optional.  The 1 month block (not ban) is due to the similar instances on your block log, the last month-long one reduced due to your promise to behave in the future ... how's that working out for you? ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">talk\u2192<\/font>]]<span style=\"border:1px solid black;\">'''&nbsp; +++$+++ :::: Which part of "''You have both been advised now, and any future interactions on each other's talkpage will lead to escalation to me''" was the most challenging?  The words "any future interactions" appears pretty straightforward and clearly non-optional.  The 1 month block (not ban) is due to the similar instances on your block log, the last month-long one reduced due to your promise to behave in the future ... how's that working out for you? ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">'''&nbsp;[[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]]&nbsp;'''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</font>]]) 12:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
3689 +++$+++  Toddst1 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3684 +++$+++ 3688 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.290807420E09 +++$+++ I think Jerzeykydd is pretty lucky that it's only a month. You also violated your 1RR restriction, editing on [[Massachusetts gubernatorial election, 2010]].   +++$+++ :::::I think Jerzeykydd is pretty lucky that it's only a month. You also violated your 1RR restriction, editing on [[Massachusetts gubernatorial election, 2010]].  [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 13:37, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
3690 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3684 +++$+++ 3689 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.290816120E09 +++$+++ No, I edited that page twice in 24 hours, and only one of them was a revert.-- +++$+++ ::::::No, I edited that page twice in 24 hours, and only one of them was a revert.--[[User:Jerzeykydd|Jerzeykydd]] ([[User talk:Jerzeykydd#top|talk]]) 16:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
3691 +++$+++ Ronhjones +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3684 +++$+++ 3690 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.290927960E09 +++$+++ No. That was TWO reverts - see definition at [[WP:3RR] - ''A \"revert\" means any edit (or administrative action) that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part'' - you removed data placed by someone else - that is a revert, then you did it again 21 minutes later. Had you placed '''fresh''' content - then that would just be an edit, but you did not. ''' +++$+++ :::::::No. That was TWO reverts - see definition at [[WP:3RR] - ''A "revert" means any edit (or administrative action) that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part'' - you removed data placed by someone else - that is a revert, then you did it again 21 minutes later. Had you placed '''fresh''' content - then that would just be an edit, but you did not. '''[[User:Ronhjones|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:black; padding:1px;background:yellow"><font color="green">&nbsp;Ron<font color="red">h</font>jones&nbsp;</font></span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Ronhjones|&nbsp;(Talk)]]</sup> 23:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

265830 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265830 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.164856620E09 +++$+++ How do you figure I was stalking.  Doesn't make any sense.  I've posted on the page  of the person you say I am stalking about that page. Also I advised him to utilize the Discussion page, which he did. I realise you think this page is yours but it is not. Others may work on it too.  +++$+++ How do you figure I was stalking.  Doesn't make any sense.  I've posted on the page  of the person you say I am stalking about that page. Also I advised him to utilize the Discussion page, which he did. I realise you think this page is yours but it is not. Others may work on it too. [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 19:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265831 +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265830 +++$+++ 265830 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.164857160E09 +++$+++ Stalking is intentionally following another editor with whom you have had a conflict to an article with which you have never been involved and then to start making controversial edits with the intent to harass the other editor. That's what you are doing. It's quite clear and may finally get you blocked. - +++$+++ :Stalking is intentionally following another editor with whom you have had a conflict to an article with which you have never been involved and then to start making controversial edits with the intent to harass the other editor. That's what you are doing. It's quite clear and may finally get you blocked. -[[User:999|999]] ([[User_talk:999|Talk]]) 19:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

265832 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.164857520E09 +++$+++ How am I stalking?  You are not being specific enough. Sincerely,   +++$+++ How am I stalking?  You are not being specific enough. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 19:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265833 +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265832 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.164869460E09 +++$+++ Further clarification. Checking the article history, I see that [[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] has been an editor of the article since at least [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Andrew_Cohen&diff=76019484&oldid=75806233 16 September 2006] and [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] since [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Andrew_Cohen&diff=78315785&oldid=78309095 28 September 2006]. Suddenly, on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Andrew_Cohen&diff=78315785&oldid=78309095 November 27], right after an edit by [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]], you make an edit which undoes her edit. You continue to do so when [[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] agrees with [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] and restores her version. Hanuman Das responds to your comment on the talk page [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AAndrew_Cohen&diff=90670644&oldid=90669866], but you never respond to his response or discuss the issue any further. However, every edit he subsequently does, you revert or change. That's stalking and harassment, in my opinion. You certainly squeal like a stuck pig when you think someone else is stalking you! So, here's the question you need to answer: ''Why did you started editing [[Andrew Cohen]] at all?'' No need to tell me, if you lie to yourself, you'll lie to anyone. - +++$+++ ::Further clarification. Checking the article history, I see that [[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] has been an editor of the article since at least [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrew_Cohen&diff=76019484&oldid=75806233 16 September 2006] and [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] since [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrew_Cohen&diff=78315785&oldid=78309095 28 September 2006]. Suddenly, on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrew_Cohen&diff=78315785&oldid=78309095 November 27], right after an edit by [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]], you make an edit which undoes her edit. You continue to do so when [[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] agrees with [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] and restores her version. Hanuman Das responds to your comment on the talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAndrew_Cohen&diff=90670644&oldid=90669866], but you never respond to his response or discuss the issue any further. However, every edit he subsequently does, you revert or change. That's stalking and harassment, in my opinion. You certainly squeal like a stuck pig when you think someone else is stalking you! So, here's the question you need to answer: ''Why did you started editing [[Andrew Cohen]] at all?'' No need to tell me, if you lie to yourself, you'll lie to anyone. -[[User:999|999]] ([[User_talk:999|Talk]]) 22:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265834 +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265832 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.164869700E09 +++$+++ P.S. I didn't follow you to the article. I was checking [[User:Hanuman Das]]'s contributions to see what he's been up to, as my watch list had nothing worth doing... - +++$+++ ::P.S. I didn't follow you to the article. I was checking [[User:Hanuman Das]]'s contributions to see what he's been up to, as my watch list had nothing worth doing... -[[User:999|999]] ([[User_talk:999|Talk]]) 22:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265835 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265832 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.164882960E09 +++$+++ You talk as if you and [[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] and [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] are all the same person. [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] and I had some civil dialog over the [[Andrew Cohen]] and another article of mine which I really enjoyed. Is that stalking [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]]? I don't understand. Both of those people I engaged in dialogue with over the [[Andrew Cohen]] article. Please explain further.  Thank you. Sincerely,   +++$+++ :::You talk as if you and [[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] and [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] are all the same person. [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] and I had some civil dialog over the [[Andrew Cohen]] and another article of mine which I really enjoyed. Is that stalking [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]]? I don't understand. Both of those people I engaged in dialogue with over the [[Andrew Cohen]] article. Please explain further.  Thank you. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 02:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
265836 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265832 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.164883260E09 +++$+++ Further, I find it offensive to use language like '''You certainly squeal like a stuck pig when you think someone else is stalking you!''' I do not think that is  civil. I am asking you not to use language like that on my talk page. Thank you. Sincerely,   +++$+++ ::::Further, I find it offensive to use language like '''You certainly squeal like a stuck pig when you think someone else is stalking you!''' I do not think that is  civil. I am asking you not to use language like that on my talk page. Thank you. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 02:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
265837 +++$+++ Septegram +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265832 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.165026480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::[[User:Septegram|Septegram]] 18:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

265838 +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265838 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.164860640E09 +++$+++ It is not correct to remove red links from articles. They are there as a request or to encourage the creation of the article. Please see [[WP:RED]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Link Recovery]]. The correct method for getting rid of a red link is to write the article. If you are not interested in doing so, please simply leave the red link alone. - +++$+++ It is not correct to remove red links from articles. They are there as a request or to encourage the creation of the article. Please see [[WP:RED]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Link Recovery]]. The correct method for getting rid of a red link is to write the article. If you are not interested in doing so, please simply leave the red link alone. -[[User:999|999]] ([[User_talk:999|Talk]]) 20:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265839 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265838 +++$+++ 265838 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.164885660E09 +++$+++ In answer to your comment above, I refer you to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AAndrew_Cohen&diff=91071369&oldid=91053672] on  the [[Andrew Cohen]] discussion page who explains much more elequently than I can. Thank you. Sincerely  +++$+++ :In answer to your comment above, I refer you to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAndrew_Cohen&diff=91071369&oldid=91053672] on  the [[Andrew Cohen]] discussion page who explains much more elequently than I can. Thank you. Sincerely [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 03:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

265840 +++$+++ Addhoc +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265840 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.164861300E09 +++$+++ Hi, could I recommend that you contact the AMA to request assistance?  +++$+++ Hi, could I recommend that you contact the AMA to request assistance? [[User:Addhoc|Addhoc]] 20:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265841 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265840 +++$+++ 265840 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.164869460E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  My advice is to complete the process of requesting an advocate.  I think it is important that the advocate system be neutral.  If you end up getting Geo, it obviously would not be neutral.  I would tend to believe that s\/he would not be so bold.  However, in the unfortunate event that you did not get a neutral advocate, at least your efforts could be put to the good use of fixing a problem with the advocate system.  In any event, I don't think any harm could come from completing the application.  My friendly opinion.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :Hi Mattisse.  My advice is to complete the process of requesting an advocate.  I think it is important that the advocate system be neutral.  If you end up getting Geo, it obviously would not be neutral.  I would tend to believe that s/he would not be so bold.  However, in the unfortunate event that you did not get a neutral advocate, at least your efforts could be put to the good use of fixing a problem with the advocate system.  In any event, I don't think any harm could come from completing the application.  My friendly opinion.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265842 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265840 +++$+++ 265841 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.164870120E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  yes, I think you should complete the application.  Then if you are assigned Geo as an advocate, we can go to the advocate people and say, \"look, you've got a problem\".  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Hi Mattisse.  yes, I think you should complete the application.  Then if you are assigned Geo as an advocate, we can go to the advocate people and say, "look, you've got a problem".  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265843 +++$+++ Kathryn_NicDhàna +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265840 +++$+++ 265842 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.164870540E09 +++$+++ I agree.  Even if an oversight led to an initial assignment of Geo, no one who has observed his recent behaviour in this matter would keep him on the case.  Can you specifically request Addhoc be assigned?  Or someone Addhoc recommends? -- +++$+++ :::I agree.  Even if an oversight led to an initial assignment of Geo, no one who has observed his recent behaviour in this matter would keep him on the case.  Can you specifically request Addhoc be assigned?  Or someone Addhoc recommends? --[[User:Kathryn NicDhàna|Kathryn NicDhàna]][[User_talk:Kathryn NicDhàna|♫]]<font color="navy">♦</font>[[Special:Contributions/Kathryn_NicDhàna|♫]] 23:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265844 +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265840 +++$+++ 265840 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.164861600E09 +++$+++ My personal advice to Mattisse is to drop the bone. If there is something wrong with the citations she disagrees with, let others fix it. Her methods and ways of communicating are extremely contentious and do more harm than good. - +++$+++ :My personal advice to Mattisse is to drop the bone. If there is something wrong with the citations she disagrees with, let others fix it. Her methods and ways of communicating are extremely contentious and do more harm than good. -[[User:999|999]] ([[User_talk:999|Talk]]) 20:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265845 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265840 +++$+++ 265844 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.164883500E09 +++$+++ Please do not use my talk page to communicate with others. If you have something to say to [[User_talk:Kathryn NicDh\xe0na]] then please put it on that user's talk page. Thank you.  Sincerely,   +++$+++ ::Please do not use my talk page to communicate with others. If you have something to say to [[User_talk:Kathryn NicDhàna]] then please put it on that user's talk page. Thank you.  Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 02:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

3697 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3697 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-07 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.294393740E09 +++$+++ I noticed you have been uploading free images of American politicians - if you wouldn't mind, would you consider uploading them directly to [[Wikimedia Commons]]? They have to be moved there eventually, it saves everyone a lot of work if they're just uploaded there straightaway. I just moved over the photo of [[Kristi Noem]].  +++$+++ I noticed you have been uploading free images of American politicians - if you wouldn't mind, would you consider uploading them directly to [[Wikimedia Commons]]? They have to be moved there eventually, it saves everyone a lot of work if they're just uploaded there straightaway. I just moved over the photo of [[Kristi Noem]]. [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 01:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
3698 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3697 +++$+++ 3697 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.294394460E09 +++$+++ It's one of the speedy deletion criteria - Commons is the free media repository for all the various projects, so I guess there's no sense in maintaining multiple copies of the same media on multiple projects. See [[Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons]]. Don't know how familiar you are with Commons, let me know if you have any questions. The upload process there is pretty much exactly the same as it is here, and images are used in articles in the exact same way. Your single-user-login should work there no problem.  +++$+++ :It's one of the speedy deletion criteria - Commons is the free media repository for all the various projects, so I guess there's no sense in maintaining multiple copies of the same media on multiple projects. See [[Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons]]. Don't know how familiar you are with Commons, let me know if you have any questions. The upload process there is pretty much exactly the same as it is here, and images are used in articles in the exact same way. Your single-user-login should work there no problem. [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 02:01, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
3699 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3697 +++$+++ 3698 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.294395120E09 +++$+++ Oh, absolutely not! Thanks for finding and uploading the images! They'll eventually be moved over to the Commons and will continue to be used here and other projects. I was just asking if you would mind uploading them straight to Commons in the future to save some work for other folks.  +++$+++ ::Oh, absolutely not! Thanks for finding and uploading the images! They'll eventually be moved over to the Commons and will continue to be used here and other projects. I was just asking if you would mind uploading them straight to Commons in the future to save some work for other folks. [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 02:12, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
3700 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3697 +++$+++ 3698 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.294395240E09 +++$+++ I should have been more clear - they only get deleted locally when a good copy exists on the Commons. So they're not really \"deleted\", they're just moved to make them more widely available.  +++$+++ ::I should have been more clear - they only get deleted locally when a good copy exists on the Commons. So they're not really "deleted", they're just moved to make them more widely available. [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 02:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

527988 +++$+++ Walkee +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-31 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.185914040E09 +++$+++ Hello, ^demon, could you please delete an edit of mine? I want to move [[Paul Ernst (disambiguation)]] back to [[Paul Ernst]], because it was a mistake to move it.  But I cannot do that, because I edited the redirect [[Image:Face-surprise.svg|20px]]. I thank you!--''''' +++$+++ Hello, ^demon, could you please delete an edit of mine? I want to move [[Paul Ernst (disambiguation)]] back to [[Paul Ernst]], because it was a mistake to move it.  But I cannot do that, because I edited the redirect [[Image:Face-surprise.svg|20px]]. I thank you!--'''''[[User:Walkee|walkee]]'''''<sup><font color="#009900">[[User_talk:Walkee|talkee]]</font></sup> 13:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
527989 +++$+++ Walkee +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527988 +++$+++ 527988 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.185914580E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot! [[Image:Face-grin.svg|20px]]--''''' +++$+++ :Thanks a lot! [[Image:Face-grin.svg|20px]]--'''''[[User:Walkee|walkee]]'''''<sup><font color="#009900">[[User_talk:Walkee|talkee]]</font></sup> 13:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

3701 +++$+++ Hekerui +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-07 09:27:00 +++$+++ 1.294421220E09 +++$+++ You should take care not to upload copyright violations - not every image on a Congress website is free. Take [[:File:David Cicilline.jpg]], which you uploaded as free federal government work - it's actually an old photo and not federal government work. Those images with a blue background look fine, as they were taken in this Congress. Again, please be careful, copyright is a serious issue.  +++$+++ You should take care not to upload copyright violations - not every image on a Congress website is free. Take [[:File:David Cicilline.jpg]], which you uploaded as free federal government work - it's actually an old photo and not federal government work. Those images with a blue background look fine, as they were taken in this Congress. Again, please be careful, copyright is a serious issue. [[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 09:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
3702 +++$+++ Hekerui +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3701 +++$+++ 3701 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.294449120E09 +++$+++ The Wikipedia image use policy states: \"Always specify on the description page where the image came from (the source) and information on how this could be verified.\" Images used on federal government websites are not automatically free, and your speculation is not evidence - the blue background images were taken after the people were sworn in, so at least one can make a case - this image has been used at least since February last year. You can write the copyright holder, asking him\/her to release an image, but please do not upload images claiming images hosted on federal government servers are automatically free. There is a discussion on this [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion\/2011 January 7#File:David Cicilline.jpg|here]].  +++$+++ :The Wikipedia image use policy states: "Always specify on the description page where the image came from (the source) and information on how this could be verified." Images used on federal government websites are not automatically free, and your speculation is not evidence - the blue background images were taken after the people were sworn in, so at least one can make a case - this image has been used at least since February last year. You can write the copyright holder, asking him/her to release an image, but please do not upload images claiming images hosted on federal government servers are automatically free. There is a discussion on this [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 January 7#File:David Cicilline.jpg|here]]. [[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 17:12, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

265846 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-30 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.164888720E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, I have withdrawn from the RfC. I must say I think 999 gives good advice. Why do you continue to worry at the whole thing when it bothers you so? Doesn't it give you ulcers or anything? It's gotta be better to just let WP take care of itself. It will, you know :-) I echo the same to 999.Why don't you drop it too. Let BostonMA and Rosencomet do the mediation thing, as they at least seem to be communicating. Get a few fresh editors in on it, and all go do something more productive. ??? &mdash; +++$+++ Just to let you know, I have withdrawn from the RfC. I must say I think 999 gives good advice. Why do you continue to worry at the whole thing when it bothers you so? Doesn't it give you ulcers or anything? It's gotta be better to just let WP take care of itself. It will, you know :-) I echo the same to 999.Why don't you drop it too. Let BostonMA and Rosencomet do the mediation thing, as they at least seem to be communicating. Get a few fresh editors in on it, and all go do something more productive. ??? &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 04:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
265847 +++$+++ Addhoc +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265846 +++$+++ 265846 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 11:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164915240E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for filling out the AMA form and I've accepted the case.  +++$+++ :Hi, thanks for filling out the AMA form and I've accepted the case. [[User:Addhoc|Addhoc]] 11:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

527991 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-01 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.185966120E09 +++$+++ I'm a new admin and still learning the ropes.... I saw yesterday a page somewhere that explained how to add tags to archive the talk page for an image when you delete it.  Can you point me to that page or just explain what the tags are, so I can delete that memorial image? Thanks,  +++$+++ I'm a new admin and still learning the ropes.... I saw yesterday a page somewhere that explained how to add tags to archive the talk page for an image when you delete it.  Can you point me to that page or just explain what the tags are, so I can delete that memorial image? Thanks, [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 04:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
527992 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527991 +++$+++ 527991 +++$+++ 2007-08-01 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.185966540E09 +++$+++ Oops, I also just realized that I probably shouldn't delete this image because I added a comment on the talk page.  Is this correct?  +++$+++ :Oops, I also just realized that I probably shouldn't delete this image because I added a comment on the talk page.  Is this correct? [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 04:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

3704 +++$+++ Flatterworld +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-07 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.302169800E09 +++$+++ I thought you might cool off after the election, but apparently you haven't. I'm sorry you detest the Untied States so much you are determined to trivialize everyone in Congress, pretending the only thing they do is run for office and get involved in 'controversies'. Obviously we don't take articles about people in business and fill them up with coverage of their job interviews, or go on endlessly about what they do or say, as opposed to what they do in their job - because '''their job''' is what makes them notable which is why that is, and should be, the focus. We are an encyclopedia, not a tabloid, as I've reminded you many times. I don't know what country you're from, or why exactly you are so determined to do sabotage articles about U.S. government figures, but I don't really care. I've tried to help you in the past, but obviously you've made your choice to be destructive on purpose and it isn't from a lack of knowledge or understanding. Actions speak louder than words.  +++$+++ I thought you might cool off after the election, but apparently you haven't. I'm sorry you detest the Untied States so much you are determined to trivialize everyone in Congress, pretending the only thing they do is run for office and get involved in 'controversies'. Obviously we don't take articles about people in business and fill them up with coverage of their job interviews, or go on endlessly about what they do or say, as opposed to what they do in their job - because '''their job''' is what makes them notable which is why that is, and should be, the focus. We are an encyclopedia, not a tabloid, as I've reminded you many times. I don't know what country you're from, or why exactly you are so determined to do sabotage articles about U.S. government figures, but I don't really care. I've tried to help you in the past, but obviously you've made your choice to be destructive on purpose and it isn't from a lack of knowledge or understanding. Actions speak louder than words. [[User:Flatterworld|Flatterworld]] ([[User talk:Flatterworld|talk]]) 02:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
3705 +++$+++  Toddst1 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3704 +++$+++ 3704 +++$+++ 2011-04-10 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.302422340E09 +++$+++ As you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AToddst1&action=historysubmit&diff=423255815&oldid=423255479 pointed out], you are edit warring, not harassing.   +++$+++ :As you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AToddst1&action=historysubmit&diff=423255815&oldid=423255479 pointed out], you are edit warring, not harassing.  [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 00:59, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
3706 +++$+++ Flatterworld +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3704 +++$+++ 3705 +++$+++ 2011-05-16 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.305548880E09 +++$+++ Which he's still doing, as he refuses to abide by any consensus he doesn't happen to personally agree with. His latest 'bit' is to claim the Cato Institute is part of the Missouri Legislature! But hey Todsdst1 - you just keep encouraging him to keep on 'improving' these articles.  +++$+++ ::Which he's still doing, as he refuses to abide by any consensus he doesn't happen to personally agree with. His latest 'bit' is to claim the Cato Institute is part of the Missouri Legislature! But hey Todsdst1 - you just keep encouraging him to keep on 'improving' these articles. [[User:Flatterworld|Flatterworld]] ([[User talk:Flatterworld|talk]]) 05:28, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
3707 +++$+++  Toddst1 +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3704 +++$+++ 3706 +++$+++ 2011-05-16 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.305553140E09 +++$+++ Diffs?   +++$+++ :::Diffs?  [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 06:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

175380 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175380 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.307896440E09 +++$+++ I reverted all your NPOV edits of the article about Borgo, which I wrote about two years ago. A couple were - according to me - ok, many others unfortunately not, while others are pure vandalism. At the moment I am abroad, so i have no time to discuss them. When I come back, we can discuss them. In the meantime, please don`t touch the article. Cheers,  +++$+++ I reverted all your NPOV edits of the article about Borgo, which I wrote about two years ago. A couple were - according to me - ok, many others unfortunately not, while others are pure vandalism. At the moment I am abroad, so i have no time to discuss them. When I come back, we can discuss them. In the meantime, please don`t touch the article. Cheers, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 09:34, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
175381 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175380 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 09:44:00 +++$+++ 1.307897040E09 +++$+++ These belong to the edits that were ok. Others were not. So, please leave my version and we will discuss it when I come back, ok? thanks,  +++$+++ ::::These belong to the edits that were ok. Others were not. So, please leave my version and we will discuss it when I come back, ok? thanks, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 09:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
175382 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ 175380 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 09:48:00 +++$+++ 1.307897280E09 +++$+++ We will discuss it when I go back home. The article has been reviewed by a fellow englishman, but de gustibus non disputandum est :-) . Thanks for your patience, cheers  +++$+++ ::::::We will discuss it when I go back home. The article has been reviewed by a fellow englishman, but de gustibus non disputandum est :-) . Thanks for your patience, cheers [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 09:48, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

527994 +++$+++ Maikel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-31 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.185901620E09 +++$+++ I wonder why you deleted Image:Gilbert_Shelton.GIF without bothering to reply to my arguments.  Now the article on Gilbert Shelton has to go without a portrait of Gilbert Shelton.  +++$+++ I wonder why you deleted Image:Gilbert_Shelton.GIF without bothering to reply to my arguments.  Now the article on Gilbert Shelton has to go without a portrait of Gilbert Shelton. [[User:Maikel|Maikel]] 10:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
527995 +++$+++ Maikel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527994 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-01 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.185984780E09 +++$+++ Being an admin is no license for arrogance.   +++$+++ ::Being an admin is no license for arrogance.  [[User:Maikel|Maikel]] 09:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
527996 +++$+++ DeadBot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527994 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-01 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.185985320E09 +++$+++ That's not arrogance, that's an admins job. There are so many images etc being nominated for deletion, the admins can't respond to every one. And also, the responses often end up getting deleted anyway, so there isn't much point. [[User:TheFearow|Matt\/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions\/TheFearow|(Contribs)]]  +++$+++ :::That's not arrogance, that's an admins job. There are so many images etc being nominated for deletion, the admins can't respond to every one. And also, the responses often end up getting deleted anyway, so there isn't much point. [[User:TheFearow|Matt/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/TheFearow|(Contribs)]] [[User:DeadBot|(Bot)]]</small> 09:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
527997 +++$+++ Maikel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527994 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.186083540E09 +++$+++ When I delete something from an article I always make the effort to leave a short note on the disscussion page.  That's just due process.   +++$+++ ::::When I delete something from an article I always make the effort to leave a short note on the disscussion page.  That's just due process.  [[User:Maikel|Maikel]] 12:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

3709 +++$+++ Victor Victoria +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3709 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-11 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.305162000E09 +++$+++ Why did you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Aaron_Schock&diff=428317923&oldid=428277439 revert me]? Unless it's vandalism, you're supposed to give a reason in the edit summary for reverting.  +++$+++ Why did you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aaron_Schock&diff=428317923&oldid=428277439 revert me]? Unless it's vandalism, you're supposed to give a reason in the edit summary for reverting. [[User:Victor Victoria|Victor Victoria]] ([[User talk:Victor Victoria|talk]]) 18:00, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
3710 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ Jerzeykydd +++$+++ 3709 +++$+++ 3709 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308781320E09 +++$+++ Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives\u2014which houses some of America's most important historical documents\u2014is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/NARA\/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]].  +++$+++ :Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]]. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

139788 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ SlackerMom +++$+++ 139788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-29 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.222733700E09 +++$+++ I pretty much agree with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Seru_(name)&curid=17920894&diff=241807293&oldid=241801704 these changes], except I would like to know why you modified the see also section to be a hatnote. Doesn't [[WP:NAMB]] have specific requirements for this?  +++$+++ I pretty much agree with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Seru_(name)&curid=17920894&diff=241807293&oldid=241801704 these changes], except I would like to know why you modified the see also section to be a hatnote. Doesn't [[WP:NAMB]] have specific requirements for this? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 17:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
139789 +++$+++ SlackerMom +++$+++ SlackerMom +++$+++ 139788 +++$+++ 139788 +++$+++ 2008-09-29 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.222733880E09 +++$+++ Right you are, Sesshomaru.  I was trying to make it look less like a dab page, but it would be more correct to leave that link in a see also section.  +++$+++ :Right you are, Sesshomaru.  I was trying to make it look less like a dab page, but it would be more correct to leave that link in a see also section. [[User:SlackerMom|SlackerMom]] ([[User talk:SlackerMom#top|talk]]) 17:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

528000 +++$+++ Todesfee +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-02 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.186055040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Todesfee|Todesfee]] 04:44, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
528001 +++$+++ DeadBot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528000 +++$+++ 528000 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.186060740E09 +++$+++ It was deleted as having an invalid fair use rational - this most likely means you uploaded it as fair use, when it was in fact public domain. You are free to re-upload with the correct licensing template, as long as you link to somewhere on the bands site where it explains that it is in the public domain. [[User:TheFearow|Matt\/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions\/TheFearow|(Contribs)]]  +++$+++ :It was deleted as having an invalid fair use rational - this most likely means you uploaded it as fair use, when it was in fact public domain. You are free to re-upload with the correct licensing template, as long as you link to somewhere on the bands site where it explains that it is in the public domain. [[User:TheFearow|Matt/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/TheFearow|(Contribs)]] [[User:DeadBot|(Bot)]]</small> 06:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

3713 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-11 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.239507300E09 +++$+++ Hey Tevildo, read the guy's article and you'll see why I put those butts up there (that and the fact that I had nothing better to do than to browse around looking for guys' butts on Commons). ;)  +++$+++ Hey Tevildo, read the guy's article and you'll see why I put those butts up there (that and the fact that I had nothing better to do than to browse around looking for guys' butts on Commons). ;) [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
3714 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3713 +++$+++ 3713 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.239532740E09 +++$+++ Feel free to remove in case your boyfriend\/girlfriend\/parents\/professors\/children are in the habit of checking your talk page... ;)  +++$+++ :Feel free to remove in case your boyfriend/girlfriend/parents/professors/children are in the habit of checking your talk page... ;) [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 03:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

265858 +++$+++ LovePatsyCline +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265858 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.165393140E09 +++$+++ Go right ahead. I have no problem with that. What you can do to that paragraph is simply cut an paste and add it to the bottom like you had said instead of tacking it on to another paragraph. if you tacked it on to another paragraph, the paragraph would be woo big. So, go right ahead and add the note to the article. I have no problem with that. Just make sure you keep that old information that was there and move it to where I had suggested. With all you references and notes, this article will sure to be the best article out there on Wikipedia! Have good day!  +++$+++ Go right ahead. I have no problem with that. What you can do to that paragraph is simply cut an paste and add it to the bottom like you had said instead of tacking it on to another paragraph. if you tacked it on to another paragraph, the paragraph would be woo big. So, go right ahead and add the note to the article. I have no problem with that. Just make sure you keep that old information that was there and move it to where I had suggested. With all you references and notes, this article will sure to be the best article out there on Wikipedia! Have good day! [[User:LovePatsyCline|LovePatsyCline]] 00:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
265859 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265858 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.164153720E09 +++$+++ Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 16:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
265860 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265858 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.164171420E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm glad you found the verse useful.  We all encounter people who do not care about us, who demean us or who ruin the fruits of our labors.  I hope this verse will give you some comfort when such situations arise.  It is a pleasure to be able to give such a gift to my dear friend.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::::Hi, I'm glad you found the verse useful.  We all encounter people who do not care about us, who demean us or who ruin the fruits of our labors.  I hope this verse will give you some comfort when such situations arise.  It is a pleasure to be able to give such a gift to my dear friend.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 20:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

3716 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3716 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-04 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.241471520E09 +++$+++ With due respect to the deletion decision of the article '''Death and Adjustment Hypotheses''', I want to request you to help me create an article on the book '''Quest for a New Death''', the first book containing the hypotheses. Practically, I am the author of the book and it is really odd and tough for me to create a neutral article on it. But if it is worth it, I want that article to be created. Even I can supply you with the report from the '''Death Studies''' journal. Please try to help me. I will be glad if you reply me on my e-mail mohammadsamirhossain@yahoo.com . +++$+++ With due respect to the deletion decision of the article '''Death and Adjustment Hypotheses''', I want to request you to help me create an article on the book '''Quest for a New Death''', the first book containing the hypotheses. Practically, I am the author of the book and it is really odd and tough for me to create a neutral article on it. But if it is worth it, I want that article to be created. Even I can supply you with the report from the '''Death Studies''' journal. Please try to help me. I will be glad if you reply me on my e-mail mohammadsamirhossain@yahoo.com .[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 14:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
3717 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3716 +++$+++ 3716 +++$+++ 2009-05-04 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.241485500E09 +++$+++ Thanks. If you see the following web page you will find some statement from Robert A Neimeyer of the University of Memphis, who is also the editor in chief of the Journal \"Death Studies\" -  http:\/\/www.bircham.us\/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=88&Itemid=109 Also the reference from McGraw-Hill is from a website that contains educational material for higher education courses from the part of McGraw-Hill itself. Could you pls help me write the primary structure of the article, so that I can add to it? Please try to help me at the primary stage, cause it is not pleasant to see the afd tag with any article. If you give me your e-mail address to mine mentioned above, I can mail you the full documents to write down the primary version. Please try to help me. +++$+++ : Thanks. If you see the following web page you will find some statement from Robert A Neimeyer of the University of Memphis, who is also the editor in chief of the Journal "Death Studies" -  http://www.bircham.us/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=88&Itemid=109 Also the reference from McGraw-Hill is from a website that contains educational material for higher education courses from the part of McGraw-Hill itself. Could you pls help me write the primary structure of the article, so that I can add to it? Please try to help me at the primary stage, cause it is not pleasant to see the afd tag with any article. If you give me your e-mail address to mine mentioned above, I can mail you the full documents to write down the primary version. Please try to help me.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 18:05, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
3718 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3716 +++$+++ 3717 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.241514120E09 +++$+++ Thanks Tevildo. I like the way you are proceeding. I should let you know that the first day when I found the MCGraw-Hill article was a bit confusing for me. I searched for the author of it by clicking its back links but they were all forbidden for the browsers. All I could find that it is purely a McGraw-Hill property. It seemed a bit funny to me finding myself so significant in McGraw-Hill educational material. Even I tried to verify the authenticity of the web page. But all I found was McGraw-Hill and the courses that it offers for higher education. Finally I accepted the truth and decided to use it as it is practically! Also I have another 3rd party reference to my book. It is the highest daily news paper in our country that reviewed my book. You can see it at http:\/\/www.thedailystar.net\/story.php?nid=56607 . Here you will find the cover page photo of the book too. I am afraid there is no more first class 3rd party reference to the book as far as I can think. Let me know what further can be done. Oh! another thing. My second book, Human Immortality, containing the elaboration of the theory was published in 2008 and also got reviewed by the same journal (waiting for print) and that one is also under a review by the special interest group for spirituality at Royal College of Psychiatrists at London, but all theses are awaited for print. +++$+++ ::Thanks Tevildo. I like the way you are proceeding. I should let you know that the first day when I found the MCGraw-Hill article was a bit confusing for me. I searched for the author of it by clicking its back links but they were all forbidden for the browsers. All I could find that it is purely a McGraw-Hill property. It seemed a bit funny to me finding myself so significant in McGraw-Hill educational material. Even I tried to verify the authenticity of the web page. But all I found was McGraw-Hill and the courses that it offers for higher education. Finally I accepted the truth and decided to use it as it is practically! Also I have another 3rd party reference to my book. It is the highest daily news paper in our country that reviewed my book. You can see it at http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=56607 . Here you will find the cover page photo of the book too. I am afraid there is no more first class 3rd party reference to the book as far as I can think. Let me know what further can be done. Oh! another thing. My second book, Human Immortality, containing the elaboration of the theory was published in 2008 and also got reviewed by the same journal (waiting for print) and that one is also under a review by the special interest group for spirituality at Royal College of Psychiatrists at London, but all theses are awaited for print.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 02:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

265861 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265861 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-22 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.164261600E09 +++$+++ Your father would bring home liquid nitrogen in a thermos?  Heavens.  I don't think I've actually seen liquid nitrogen except in science films.  I remember the instructor on the film dipped a peeled banana in liquid nitrogen, then hammered a nail into a piece of wood with the banana!  Have a good thanksgiving!  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Your father would bring home liquid nitrogen in a thermos?  Heavens.  I don't think I've actually seen liquid nitrogen except in science films.  I remember the instructor on the film dipped a peeled banana in liquid nitrogen, then hammered a nail into a piece of wood with the banana!  Have a good thanksgiving!  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
265862 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265861 +++$+++ 265861 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.164680760E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  Please do not imagine that I am put off.  You are certainly my dear friend, and I am honored if you count me among your friends.  I understand why you have chosen to stop editting India related articles.  Although I value the contributions you have made to India related articles, I am sure that contributions to other areas of the encyclopedia can be equally fulfilling if not more so.  Please keep in touch.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :Hi Mattisse.  Please do not imagine that I am put off.  You are certainly my dear friend, and I am honored if you count me among your friends.  I understand why you have chosen to stop editting India related articles.  Although I value the contributions you have made to India related articles, I am sure that contributions to other areas of the encyclopedia can be equally fulfilling if not more so.  Please keep in touch.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

3719 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-08 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.241816640E09 +++$+++ I am waiting for your further response. +++$+++ I am waiting for your further response.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 14:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
3720 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3719 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-13 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.242248160E09 +++$+++ Thanks my friend. I understand and I hope to come back later in future when things will get stronger. Thank you again. +++$+++ :: Thanks my friend. I understand and I hope to come back later in future when things will get stronger. Thank you again.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 13:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

528008 +++$+++ The Evil Spartan +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528008 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-02 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.186103160E09 +++$+++ I'm not quite sure why you thought this was unused. It was in use at [[Delirious?]]. Please undelete.  +++$+++ I'm not quite sure why you thought this was unused. It was in use at [[Delirious?]]. Please undelete. [[User:The Evil Spartan|The Evil Spartan]] 18:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
528009 +++$+++ The Evil Spartan +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528008 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.186104000E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ ::Thank you. [[User:The Evil Spartan|The Evil Spartan]] 18:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

3725 +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3725 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-28 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.259459820E09 +++$+++ Hi.  [[User:Steguru]]?  Remember to log in so that you can pick up your talk page messages. :)  +++$+++ Hi.  [[User:Steguru]]?  Remember to log in so that you can pick up your talk page messages. :) [[User:Tevildo|Tevildo]] ([[User talk:Tevildo|talk]]) 17:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
3726 +++$+++ 199.125.109.102 +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3725 +++$+++ 3725 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.259460420E09 +++$+++ Nope, I do not resemble that remark. Wrong user. [[Special:Contributions\/199.125.109.102|199.125.109.102]] ( +++$+++ :Nope, I do not resemble that remark. Wrong user. [[Special:Contributions/199.125.109.102|199.125.109.102]] ([[User talk:199.125.109.102|talk]]) 18:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

445305 +++$+++ D.M.N. +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-16 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.213657620E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:D.M.N.&diff=prev&oldid=219721130#On_approaching_other_editors] I've had enough. Contact me via e-mail if necessary.  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:D.M.N.&diff=prev&oldid=219721130#On_approaching_other_editors] I've had enough. Contact me via e-mail if necessary. [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 16:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
445306 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445305 +++$+++ 445305 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.213657920E09 +++$+++ I'll think about this more, but my advice to you is to avoid the situation now for at least a short while. ANI, the demon that it is, tends to do this. This was not a ''major'' issue, just something you wanted assistance with... and if anything, things have been made worse. I also think there is a good deal of misunderstanding going on now, I myself being somewhat guilty.  +++$+++ :I'll think about this more, but my advice to you is to avoid the situation now for at least a short while. ANI, the demon that it is, tends to do this. This was not a ''major'' issue, just something you wanted assistance with... and if anything, things have been made worse. I also think there is a good deal of misunderstanding going on now, I myself being somewhat guilty. [[User:Gwynand|Gwynand]] | [[User_talk:Gwynand|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Gwynand|Contribs]] 16:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
445307 +++$+++ D.M.N. +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445305 +++$+++ 445306 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.213659900E09 +++$+++ Done. I've apologised to Tony for any wrongdoing on my behalf. My hope is that it'll be left at that.  +++$+++ ::Done. I've apologised to Tony for any wrongdoing on my behalf. My hope is that it'll be left at that. [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 16:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
445308 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445305 +++$+++ 445307 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.213659960E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I'll do my best to help keep it at that.  +++$+++ :::Thank you. I'll do my best to help keep it at that. [[User:Gwynand|Gwynand]] | [[User_talk:Gwynand|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Gwynand|Contribs]] 16:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

568600 +++$+++ Nae'blis +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-24 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.153772520E09 +++$+++ Did you by chance vote support [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Eluchil404|here]] without being logged in? There's been some problems with imposters, but sometimes users get logged out accidentally, etc... just checking. --  +++$+++ Did you by chance vote support [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Eluchil404|here]] without being logged in? There's been some problems with imposters, but sometimes users get logged out accidentally, etc... just checking. -- [[User:Nae'blis|nae'blis]] <i><sub>[[User_talk:Nae'blis|(talk)]]</sub></i> 13:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
568601 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568600 +++$+++ 568600 +++$+++ 2006-07-24 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.153779000E09 +++$+++ I didn't vote in this RfA.  It looks like an AOL vandal took a liking to my sig and copied it in order to abuse the process.  Now that you mention it, I am having problems staying logged in to the servers and my Talk page keeps losing conversations. They exist in the history but not on-screen. A problem with the Wiki LDAP server, perhaps? <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :I didn't vote in this RfA.  It looks like an AOL vandal took a liking to my sig and copied it in order to abuse the process.  Now that you mention it, I am having problems staying logged in to the servers and my Talk page keeps losing conversations. They exist in the history but not on-screen. A problem with the Wiki LDAP server, perhaps? <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 15:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

528018 +++$+++ ElinorD +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-06 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.186432140E09 +++$+++ Hi, I was deleting images from the same category at the same time as you, and found that you had just beaten me to it when I was about to remove an image from a page before deleting it. I then looked at your contributions, and found that you manage to remove several images from articles every minute. Are you using some special tool? If so, can I use it too? I find that removing images from articles really slows me down when I'm working my way through a category of images ready for deletion. By the way, I use [[User:Howcheng\/quickimgdelete.js]] for tagging images, but although I'm not fully familiar with it yet, I don't think there's anything in it that helps to orphan an image that you're about to delete. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, I was deleting images from the same category at the same time as you, and found that you had just beaten me to it when I was about to remove an image from a page before deleting it. I then looked at your contributions, and found that you manage to remove several images from articles every minute. Are you using some special tool? If so, can I use it too? I find that removing images from articles really slows me down when I'm working my way through a category of images ready for deletion. By the way, I use [[User:Howcheng/quickimgdelete.js]] for tagging images, but although I'm not fully familiar with it yet, I don't think there's anything in it that helps to orphan an image that you're about to delete. Thanks. [[User:ElinorD|ElinorD]] [[User talk:ElinorD|(talk)]] 13:29, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
528019 +++$+++ ElinorD +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528018 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.186432260E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'll take a look.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. I'll take a look. [[User:ElinorD|ElinorD]] [[User talk:ElinorD|(talk)]] 13:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

612291 +++$+++ Rcpaterson +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-25 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.151287200E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Rcpaterson|Rcpaterson]] 19:00, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
612292 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612291 +++$+++ 612291 +++$+++ 2006-06-25 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.151298600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that help, and apologies for distracting you from the Wars of Independence. I'm now happy that there's enough ammunition to deal with such unsubstantiated complaints. A thorough overhaul will be welcome, my contribution is really just a sticking plaster to try to bring some slight improvement in the meantime. It's certainly a complex subject, riddled with myth. ..  +++$+++ :Thanks for that help, and apologies for distracting you from the Wars of Independence. I'm now happy that there's enough ammunition to deal with such unsubstantiated complaints. A thorough overhaul will be welcome, my contribution is really just a sticking plaster to try to bring some slight improvement in the meantime. It's certainly a complex subject, riddled with myth. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:10, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

528021 +++$+++ Fall Of Darkness +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-06 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.186448400E09 +++$+++ Hello, I found your page while viewing the Mediation page. I had a few questions before putting in a request for mediation. I wanted to make sure I would be able to, as I am not either party of the dispute. Also, the dispute has run on not only 1 article's talk page, but 2- as well as spilling over onto several members' talk pages. I know I am only giving you general information, but does this seem to be grounds for a mediation?  - +++$+++ Hello, I found your page while viewing the Mediation page. I had a few questions before putting in a request for mediation. I wanted to make sure I would be able to, as I am not either party of the dispute. Also, the dispute has run on not only 1 article's talk page, but 2- as well as spilling over onto several members' talk pages. I know I am only giving you general information, but does this seem to be grounds for a mediation?  -[[User:Fall Of Darkness|Fall Of Darkness]] 18:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
528022 +++$+++ Fall Of Darkness +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528021 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.186518780E09 +++$+++ Well, it started as content dispute, and then turned into behavioral.  Thank you for your help though! I did not realize that you were not active at this time- the link on the bottom of the page brought me to your talk page, so you might want to look into that :-). Thanks again! - +++$+++ ::Well, it started as content dispute, and then turned into behavioral.  Thank you for your help though! I did not realize that you were not active at this time- the link on the bottom of the page brought me to your talk page, so you might want to look into that :-). Thanks again! -[[User:Fall Of Darkness|Fall Of Darkness]] 13:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

3734 +++$+++ EdJogg +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3734 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-28 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.301342400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:EdJogg|EdJogg]] ([[User talk:EdJogg|talk]]) 13:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
3735 +++$+++ EdJogg +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3734 +++$+++ 3734 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.301812200E09 +++$+++ I see you're not currently active, so I've been [[WP:BOLD]] and removed the hatnote. We can replace it later if appropriate. --  +++$+++ :I see you're not currently active, so I've been [[WP:BOLD]] and removed the hatnote. We can replace it later if appropriate. -- [[User:EdJogg|EdJogg]] ([[User talk:EdJogg|talk]]) 23:30, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
3736 +++$+++ 80.254.147.84 +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3734 +++$+++ 3735 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.301963220E09 +++$+++ Hi there - sorry for not getting back to you earlier.  I added the hatnote because I was reading an accident report from the sixties in which the loco in question was referred to as a \"Class 4 CoCo\".  I suppose anyone who is in the habit of reading accident reports from the sixties would know that it should have been \"[Brush] Type 4\" instead, but I thought it was possible that someone would want to look up \"Class 4\" based on such a source; at the moment, they'll only get to the shunter page rather than the Class 47 page.  Perhaps <nowiki>{{distinguish}}<\/nowiki> rather than <nowiki>{{See also}}<\/nowiki> might have been a better hatnote, but I agree it's not essential. (Tevildo not-logged-in) [[Special:Contributions\/80.254.147.84|80.254.147.84]] ( +++$+++ ::Hi there - sorry for not getting back to you earlier.  I added the hatnote because I was reading an accident report from the sixties in which the loco in question was referred to as a "Class 4 CoCo".  I suppose anyone who is in the habit of reading accident reports from the sixties would know that it should have been "[Brush] Type 4" instead, but I thought it was possible that someone would want to look up "Class 4" based on such a source; at the moment, they'll only get to the shunter page rather than the Class 47 page.  Perhaps <nowiki>{{distinguish}}</nowiki> rather than <nowiki>{{See also}}</nowiki> might have been a better hatnote, but I agree it's not essential. (Tevildo not-logged-in) [[Special:Contributions/80.254.147.84|80.254.147.84]] ([[User talk:80.254.147.84|talk]]) 17:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
3737 +++$+++ EdJogg +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3734 +++$+++ 3736 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.301985840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:EdJogg|EdJogg]] ([[User talk:EdJogg|talk]]) 23:44, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

528024 +++$+++ Leifern +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-06 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.186453920E09 +++$+++ I can see no basis for a consensus on this issue. I count 59 who wanted it deleted, and 45 who wanted it kept. Please elaborate how you arrived at the conclusion that a deletion was determined, aside from your own judgment on the issue. -- +++$+++ I can see no basis for a consensus on this issue. I count 59 who wanted it deleted, and 45 who wanted it kept. Please elaborate how you arrived at the conclusion that a deletion was determined, aside from your own judgment on the issue. --[[User:Leifern|Leifern]] 19:32, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
528025 +++$+++ XDanielx +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528024 +++$+++ 528024 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.186461000E09 +++$+++ --<span style=\"font:bold 11px Arial;display:inline;border:#000066 1px solid;background-color:#ECF1F7;padding:0 4px 0 4px;\"> +++$+++ :--<span style="font:bold 11px Arial;display:inline;border:#000066 1px solid;background-color:#ECF1F7;padding:0 4px 0 4px;">[[User:XDanielx|xDanielx]]</span><sup>[[User_talk:XDanielx|Talk]]</sup> 21:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
528026 +++$+++ Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528024 +++$+++ 528024 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.186467540E09 +++$+++ Except you didn't just \"close\" the debate, you also deleted the article despite the votes being roughly equal to one another. I fail to see how that makes sense.-  +++$+++ :Except you didn't just "close" the debate, you also deleted the article despite the votes being roughly equal to one another. I fail to see how that makes sense.- [[User:Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg|Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg]] | [[User talk:Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg|Talk]] 23:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
528027 +++$+++ IronDuke +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528024 +++$+++ 528026 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.186472580E09 +++$+++ Myself, I was hoping for an admin who would actually try to read consensus, since this was a wiki last time I checked. \"This debate has raised some very interesting points, all of which are valid\" = \"Therefore I deleted it\"? Makes no sense at all. <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ ::Myself, I was hoping for an admin who would actually try to read consensus, since this was a wiki last time I checked. "This debate has raised some very interesting points, all of which are valid" = "Therefore I deleted it"? Makes no sense at all. <font color="green">[[User:IronDuke|IronDuke]]</font> 00:43, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
528028 +++$+++ Leifern +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528024 +++$+++ 528027 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.186476360E09 +++$+++ Demon, neither the closing argument nor the rantings here make any sense. -- +++$+++ :::Demon, neither the closing argument nor the rantings here make any sense. --[[User:Leifern|Leifern]] 01:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

3738 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3738 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-04 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.301986200E09 +++$+++ I note that this draft page has been dormant for over a year. Please blank or delete it until you are ready to post the RFCU. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ I note that this draft page has been dormant for over a year. Please blank or delete it until you are ready to post the RFCU. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 23:50, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
3739 +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ Tevildo +++$+++ 3738 +++$+++ 3738 +++$+++ 2011-04-05 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.302046080E09 +++$+++ [[WP:MFD]] is that way if you feel so strongly about it.  I'm no longer an active contributor to this site, as this sort of message exemplifies its current ethos perfectly.  Do not expect any further input from me on this issue.  +++$+++ :[[WP:MFD]] is that way if you feel so strongly about it.  I'm no longer an active contributor to this site, as this sort of message exemplifies its current ethos perfectly.  Do not expect any further input from me on this issue. [[User:Tevildo|Tevildo]] ([[User talk:Tevildo#top|talk]]) 16:28, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

528030 +++$+++ Jossi +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-07 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.186472820E09 +++$+++ I have already merged the content of the deleted article into [[Human rights in China]], where the research can copyediting can continue. Now that this is hopefully behind us, I would encourage editors to give a helping hand to merge all other \"Allegations of XXXX apartheid\"  into other more relevant articles based on the same arguments presented at the close. Proposals have been posted in each one of these articles. I intend to effectuate these merges, in the coming days pending discussion at these talk pages.  +++$+++ I have already merged the content of the deleted article into [[Human rights in China]], where the research can copyediting can continue. Now that this is hopefully behind us, I would encourage editors to give a helping hand to merge all other "Allegations of XXXX apartheid"  into other more relevant articles based on the same arguments presented at the close. Proposals have been posted in each one of these articles. I intend to effectuate these merges, in the coming days pending discussion at these talk pages. [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 00:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
528031 +++$+++ Jossi +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528030 +++$+++ 528030 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.186473300E09 +++$+++ I am inviting you and others to help with other similar disputes.  +++$+++ : I am inviting you and others to help with other similar disputes. [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 00:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
528032 +++$+++ Ohconfucius +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528030 +++$+++ 528030 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 09:56:00 +++$+++ 1.186505760E09 +++$+++ I would like to praise your courageous attempt to summarise the debate for the above. I think it was a messy and acrimonious debate, and it was a refreshing surprise to find an admin who actually believes in policy as a matter of conviction, rather than one who limply attempts to find a lame consensus at the expense of policies and guidelines.  +++$+++ *I would like to praise your courageous attempt to summarise the debate for the above. I think it was a messy and acrimonious debate, and it was a refreshing surprise to find an admin who actually believes in policy as a matter of conviction, rather than one who limply attempts to find a lame consensus at the expense of policies and guidelines. [[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] 09:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

3743 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-04 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.294202460E09 +++$+++ |}-- +++$+++ |}--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 20:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
3744 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3743 +++$+++ 3743 +++$+++ 2011-01-06 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.294317720E09 +++$+++ Welcome to the project. -- +++$+++ :Welcome to the project. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 04:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

3745 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-09 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.294571820E09 +++$+++ It's time for other editors to get their hands on [[Natural dye]], so I moved it up from my sandbox.  Have at it. -  +++$+++ It's time for other editors to get their hands on [[Natural dye]], so I moved it up from my sandbox.  Have at it. - [[User:PKM|PKM]] ([[User talk:PKM#top|talk]]) 03:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
3746 +++$+++ Bluerasberry +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3745 +++$+++ 3745 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.294618440E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your effort.  I cannot say when I will be able to contribute to this but I certainly will when I can and I will be watching this article.  +++$+++ :Thank you for your effort.  I cannot say when I will be able to contribute to this but I certainly will when I can and I will be watching this article. [[User talk:Bluerasberry|<b><font color="#0000CC">Blue</font> <font color="#0033FF">Rasberry</font></b>]] 16:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

528035 +++$+++ Ryecatcher773 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-07 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.186477980E09 +++$+++ Motion seconded. And to add, pretty much every professional Football club article, from every league, has the crest. Why single out 1 or 2 from the hundreds? Please restore.   +++$+++ Motion seconded. And to add, pretty much every professional Football club article, from every league, has the crest. Why single out 1 or 2 from the hundreds? Please restore.  [[User:Ryecatcher773|Ryecatcher773]] 02:13, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
528036 +++$+++ Dave101 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528035 +++$+++ 528035 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 09:14:00 +++$+++ 1.186503240E09 +++$+++ Third the above. Why was it deleted? The image was in use on the Arsenal F.C. article. Yes, it is unfree, but all other football logos are allowed with fair use rationales. Please see [[WP:LOGO]]. <u><font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ :Third the above. Why was it deleted? The image was in use on the Arsenal F.C. article. Yes, it is unfree, but all other football logos are allowed with fair use rationales. Please see [[WP:LOGO]]. <u><font color="black">[[User:Dave101|Dave101]]</font></u><small>→<font color="AE1C28">[[User talk:Dave101|''talk'']]</font></small>&nbsp; 09:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
528037 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528035 +++$+++ 528035 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.186499220E09 +++$+++ I think you should take a look at this - Leifern is using it as a platform to take shots at you. --  +++$+++ :I think you should take a look at this - Leifern is using it as a platform to take shots at you. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] 08:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

528039 +++$+++ Dbiel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528039 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-06 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.186438440E09 +++$+++ The preceeding post was archived without a reply. It is being reposted prior to filing a formal complaint about a Rogue Admin abusing his power.  +++$+++ The preceeding post was archived without a reply. It is being reposted prior to filing a formal complaint about a Rogue Admin abusing his power. [[User:Dbiel|Dbiel]] <sup>([[User talk:Dbiel|Talk]])</sup> 15:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
528040 +++$+++ Dbiel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528039 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.186456920E09 +++$+++ My intent is to replace the poor quality image with the image you deleted.  Your deletion makes that impossible.  The point remains that the image file was referenced as to the deletion of its usage and the intent to reuse it. Your action is no different than the specificly prohibited action of deleting an image listed on [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]] prior to reaching a final decision. Additionally you have continued to ignore the request to undelete the image. Why?  +++$+++ ::My intent is to replace the poor quality image with the image you deleted.  Your deletion makes that impossible.  The point remains that the image file was referenced as to the deletion of its usage and the intent to reuse it. Your action is no different than the specificly prohibited action of deleting an image listed on [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]] prior to reaching a final decision. Additionally you have continued to ignore the request to undelete the image. Why? [[User:Dbiel|Dbiel]] <sup>([[User talk:Dbiel|Talk]])</sup> 20:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
528041 +++$+++ Dbiel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528039 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.186457220E09 +++$+++ Also quoting from the article you referenced: ''\"Reasonable exceptions may be made for images uploaded for an upcoming article\"'' This exception would likewise apply when there is a discussion in place regarding the usage of an image.  +++$+++ ::Also quoting from the article you referenced: ''"Reasonable exceptions may be made for images uploaded for an upcoming article"'' This exception would likewise apply when there is a discussion in place regarding the usage of an image. [[User:Dbiel|Dbiel]] <sup>([[User talk:Dbiel|Talk]])</sup> 20:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
528042 +++$+++ Dbiel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528039 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.186539660E09 +++$+++ I would still link to replace the above image with the only you deleted.  +++$+++ ::::I would still link to replace the above image with the only you deleted. [[User:Dbiel|Dbiel]] <sup>([[User talk:Dbiel|Talk]])</sup> 19:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

265896 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265896 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-02 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.165117800E09 +++$+++ You'll see that on the face of it, both are the same, but the wikitext is very different.  If {{tl|done}} were to be edited, the top one would refelct these changes, and the bottom one would stay this same.  Hence substitution reduces load on the servers (they don't have to replace the text on every page) and prevent vandalism (one bad edit to a high-use translcuded template could have major implaications).  There are many cases where substitiuation is not deisrable, but for a general rule, messages to user talk pages are subst'd.  I hope I've been able to help.  [[WP:SUBST|This]] page may explain more\/better :) <strong>[[User:Martinp23|M]] +++$+++ You'll see that on the face of it, both are the same, but the wikitext is very different.  If {{tl|done}} were to be edited, the top one would refelct these changes, and the bottom one would stay this same.  Hence substitution reduces load on the servers (they don't have to replace the text on every page) and prevent vandalism (one bad edit to a high-use translcuded template could have major implaications).  There are many cases where substitiuation is not deisrable, but for a general rule, messages to user talk pages are subst'd.  I hope I've been able to help.  [[WP:SUBST|This]] page may explain more/better :) <strong>[[User:Martinp23|M]][[User:Martinp23/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User_talk:Martinp23|rtinp23]]</strong> 19:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
265897 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265896 +++$+++ 265896 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.165120920E09 +++$+++ You're welcome - glad to have been able to help.  If you have any more questions, please don't hesitate to ask.  Thanks <strong>[[User:Martinp23|M]] +++$+++ :You're welcome - glad to have been able to help.  If you have any more questions, please don't hesitate to ask.  Thanks <strong>[[User:Martinp23|M]][[User:Martinp23/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User_talk:Martinp23|rtinp23]]</strong> 20:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

3753 +++$+++ Jeanne boleyn +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-22 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.295751060E09 +++$+++ With the images you've been adding to the 1945-1960 in fashion article! They look great.-- +++$+++ With the images you've been adding to the 1945-1960 in fashion article! They look great.--[[User:Jeanne boleyn|Jeanne Boleyn]] ([[User talk:Jeanne boleyn|talk]]) 18:51, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
3754 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3753 +++$+++ 3753 +++$+++ 2011-01-22 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.295753220E09 +++$+++ Thanks! -  +++$+++ :Thanks! - [[User:PKM|PKM]] ([[User talk:PKM#top|talk]]) 19:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

528043 +++$+++ Nick Dowling +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-07 08:37:00 +++$+++ 1.186501020E09 +++$+++ I had disputed the claim that [[Image:HMAS Armidale.jpg]] was replacable on the image's talk page and there was no response. On what grounds did you delete this image? -- +++$+++ I had disputed the claim that [[Image:HMAS Armidale.jpg]] was replacable on the image's talk page and there was no response. On what grounds did you delete this image? --[[User:Nick Dowling|Nick Dowling]] 08:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
528044 +++$+++ Nick Dowling +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528043 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-08 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.186596180E09 +++$+++ That is not mentioned in the warning message placed on my talk page (the instruction being \"On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all\" - which I did). Moreover, simply deleting the image without first discussing how the fair use rationale and use of the photo needed to be amended seems to be anything but an assumption of good faith. The only other time an image I uploaded has been tagged as potentially being replaceable it was saved from the chopping block after the relevant admin took the time to discuss the image's use with me. -- +++$+++ ::That is not mentioned in the warning message placed on my talk page (the instruction being "On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all" - which I did). Moreover, simply deleting the image without first discussing how the fair use rationale and use of the photo needed to be amended seems to be anything but an assumption of good faith. The only other time an image I uploaded has been tagged as potentially being replaceable it was saved from the chopping block after the relevant admin took the time to discuss the image's use with me. --[[User:Nick Dowling|Nick Dowling]] 11:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

528045 +++$+++ Masamage +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528045 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-07 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.186548360E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Masamage|Masamage]] [[User talk:Masamage|♫]] 21:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
528046 +++$+++ Masamage +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528045 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-08 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.186622640E09 +++$+++ No problem. ^_^ Thank you! -- +++$+++ ::No problem. ^_^ Thank you! --[[User:Masamage|Masamage]] [[User talk:Masamage|♫]] 18:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

3759 +++$+++ Dsp13 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3759 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-20 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.298190420E09 +++$+++ Hi, noticed you added this to the Women's History requested translation page - not sure how the German article would help expand the stub though, as it's no bigger! +++$+++ Hi, noticed you added this to the Women's History requested translation page - not sure how the German article would help expand the stub though, as it's no bigger![[User:Dsp13|Dsp13]] ([[User talk:Dsp13|talk]]) 00:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
3760 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3759 +++$+++ 3759 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.298190720E09 +++$+++ Ha, I added that since there's a tag to that effect on the article.  I'll remove it. -  +++$+++ :Ha, I added that since there's a tag to that effect on the article.  I'll remove it. - [[User:PKM|PKM]] ([[User talk:PKM#top|talk]]) 00:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
3761 +++$+++ Dsp13 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3759 +++$+++ 3760 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.298256840E09 +++$+++ and I've removed the tag on the article! it is nice having so many people getting involved with women's history atm. +++$+++ ::and I've removed the tag on the article! it is nice having so many people getting involved with women's history atm.[[User:Dsp13|Dsp13]] ([[User talk:Dsp13|talk]]) 18:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

528048 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-08 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.186622400E09 +++$+++ You speedy deleted this under [[WP:CSD#G4]], recreation of previously deleted content. The previous deletion discussion ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Christianity Explored]]) in 2005, focused on the advertising nature of the article, and when asked to indicate what about the very short article made it an ad, one editor said: \"''The only information to speak of is \"It is similar to the Alpha Course\" and a link, that is what makes it an ad (Link to a site advertising a product, without substantial content): the page lacks sufficient context to be a stub: other courses similar to Alpha can of course be discussed in Alpha Course. It may be true that Christianity Explored is significant, but the reader would not know and be able to verify that from reading the article and its links.''\" That comment seems to sum up the views of those who favored deletion in 2005 pretty well. I don't think that the version just deleted fits that description. The more recent version contains several sentences of description of the course, and gives a significantly better explanation of what it is and why it might be notable. i don't think it is \"''substantially identical to the deleted version and that any changes to it do not address the reasons for which it was deleted.''\" as [[WP:CSD]] has it. Please consider undelting this, or do you think the matter ought to be reviewed on DRV? I know it has been discussed on ANI in the context of MattCrypto's undeletion.  +++$+++ You speedy deleted this under [[WP:CSD#G4]], recreation of previously deleted content. The previous deletion discussion ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christianity Explored]]) in 2005, focused on the advertising nature of the article, and when asked to indicate what about the very short article made it an ad, one editor said: "''The only information to speak of is "It is similar to the Alpha Course" and a link, that is what makes it an ad (Link to a site advertising a product, without substantial content): the page lacks sufficient context to be a stub: other courses similar to Alpha can of course be discussed in Alpha Course. It may be true that Christianity Explored is significant, but the reader would not know and be able to verify that from reading the article and its links.''" That comment seems to sum up the views of those who favored deletion in 2005 pretty well. I don't think that the version just deleted fits that description. The more recent version contains several sentences of description of the course, and gives a significantly better explanation of what it is and why it might be notable. i don't think it is "''substantially identical to the deleted version and that any changes to it do not address the reasons for which it was deleted.''" as [[WP:CSD]] has it. Please consider undelting this, or do you think the matter ought to be reviewed on DRV? I know it has been discussed on ANI in the context of MattCrypto's undeletion. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 18:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
528049 +++$+++ Nondistinguished +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528048 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.186662720E09 +++$+++ I suggested the articles associated with the now deleted [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/The Good Book Company|The Good Book Company]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Tim Thornborough|Tim Thornborough]] articles be deleted as they were being posted at Wikipedia to advertise for the company. This was one of those articles and it was speedy deleted by an admin when I posted the dab-4 notice upon learning that this was a recreation of deleted content when beginning the process of proposing an AfD. I think at this point since the article has been deleted three times that the proper way to deal with this is to post it at DRV if someone really thinks that there is notable\/verifiable content worth saving: and since the other two articles associated with this one were also deleted, note of those two articles deletion debates should be made. -- +++$+++ ::I suggested the articles associated with the now deleted [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Good Book Company|The Good Book Company]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Thornborough|Tim Thornborough]] articles be deleted as they were being posted at Wikipedia to advertise for the company. This was one of those articles and it was speedy deleted by an admin when I posted the dab-4 notice upon learning that this was a recreation of deleted content when beginning the process of proposing an AfD. I think at this point since the article has been deleted three times that the proper way to deal with this is to post it at DRV if someone really thinks that there is notable/verifiable content worth saving: and since the other two articles associated with this one were also deleted, note of those two articles deletion debates should be made. --[[User:Nondistinguished|Nondistinguished]] 05:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

594274 +++$+++ 63.209.14.211 +++$+++ Daniel Quinlan +++$+++ 594274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-27 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.111963080E09 +++$+++ Please stop the stupid \"retaliatory reverts\" of unrelated articles because of your disagreement on [[Ronald Reagan]]. You restored a plain falsehood on [[Congo]] (it wasn't the former French Equatorial Africa, it was just a part of it) plus an unimportant and possibly misleading mention of Mobutu (who was in power years before he named the country Zaire). Pointlessly raising doubts about edits such as on [[Christmas Island]] is not constructive either (you can easily verify it yourself if you cared to do some research, or else don't raise doubts where you don't have the slightest reason).  +++$+++ Please stop the stupid "retaliatory reverts" of unrelated articles because of your disagreement on [[Ronald Reagan]]. You restored a plain falsehood on [[Congo]] (it wasn't the former French Equatorial Africa, it was just a part of it) plus an unimportant and possibly misleading mention of Mobutu (who was in power years before he named the country Zaire). Pointlessly raising doubts about edits such as on [[Christmas Island]] is not constructive either (you can easily verify it yourself if you cared to do some research, or else don't raise doubts where you don't have the slightest reason). [[User:63.209.14.211|63.209.14.211]] 14:38, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
594275 +++$+++ Viajero +++$+++ Daniel Quinlan +++$+++ 594274 +++$+++ 594274 +++$+++ 2005-03-27 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.111995720E09 +++$+++ Daniel, 63.209.14.211 listed you on [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/3RR]] and a brief summary of the Reagan page history indicates he\/she has a point. Take it easy, will ya? --  +++$+++ :Daniel, 63.209.14.211 listed you on [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR]] and a brief summary of the Reagan page history indicates he/she has a point. Take it easy, will ya? -- [[User:Viajero|Viajero]] 23:42, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
594276 +++$+++ Viajero +++$+++ Daniel Quinlan +++$+++ 594274 +++$+++ 594275 +++$+++ 2005-03-28 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.111996800E09 +++$+++ Ok, I didn't see the comment on the talk page. In any case, everyone has different things they find satisfying to do on Wikipedia; why don't you spend time on things that give you pleasure? Getting involved in draw-out POV battles over articles like Pinochet and the like is a sure-fire recipe for burnout. --  +++$+++ ::Ok, I didn't see the comment on the talk page. In any case, everyone has different things they find satisfying to do on Wikipedia; why don't you spend time on things that give you pleasure? Getting involved in draw-out POV battles over articles like Pinochet and the like is a sure-fire recipe for burnout. -- [[User:Viajero|Viajero]] 00:00, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

3763 +++$+++ Dereckson +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-26 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.298760720E09 +++$+++ I'm waiting for your instructions about what I should do with this picture. Thank you. -- +++$+++ I'm waiting for your instructions about what I should do with this picture. Thank you. --[[User:Dereckson|Dereckson]] ([[User talk:Dereckson|talk]]) 14:52, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
3764 +++$+++ Dereckson +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3763 +++$+++ 3763 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.298866500E09 +++$+++ Once reimported here, the commons. version will be deleted with the summary ''Derivative work of a copyrighted object.'' -- +++$+++ :Once reimported here, the commons. version will be deleted with the summary ''Derivative work of a copyrighted object.'' --[[User:Dereckson|Dereckson]] ([[User talk:Dereckson|talk]]) 20:15, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

3765 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3765 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-27 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.298815320E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 06:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
3766 +++$+++ Voceditenore +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3765 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 06:38:00 +++$+++ 1.298817480E09 +++$+++ Hi PKM, When I saw this was already in the prep area, I reminded the DYK people yesterday that you had asked for this to be held over until March 8th.  It may be too late to change it, but perhaps you could check with them [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#DYK_The_Monument_of_Matrones_-_can_this_be_held_over_please here]. Best,  +++$+++ :*Hi PKM, When I saw this was already in the prep area, I reminded the DYK people yesterday that you had asked for this to be held over until March 8th.  It may be too late to change it, but perhaps you could check with them [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#DYK_The_Monument_of_Matrones_-_can_this_be_held_over_please here]. Best, [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 06:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

3767 +++$+++ Skier Dude2 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3767 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-02 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.299072120E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of \"file\" pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Skier Dude2|Skier Dude2]] ([[User talk:Skier Dude2|talk]]) 05:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
3768 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3767 +++$+++ 3767 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.299502800E09 +++$+++ It looks like sooner-or-later it will get replaced with the one on commons - thanks.  +++$+++ :It looks like sooner-or-later it will get replaced with the one on commons - thanks. [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 05:00, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
3769 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3767 +++$+++ 3768 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.299573960E09 +++$+++ But the one on Commons is going to be deleted...that's what started this whole thing. <confused> -  +++$+++ ::But the one on Commons is going to be deleted...that's what started this whole thing. <confused> - [[User:PKM|PKM]] ([[User talk:PKM#top|talk]]) 00:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
3770 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3767 +++$+++ 3767 +++$+++ 2011-03-12 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.299929340E09 +++$+++ Update- it appears that it's back on the article - if this starts up again let me know & I'll see if we can get some resolution between here & commons... let the 'sleeping dog' alone at this point :)  +++$+++ :Update- it appears that it's back on the article - if this starts up again let me know & I'll see if we can get some resolution between here & commons... let the 'sleeping dog' alone at this point :) [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 03:29, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
3771 +++$+++ Voceditenore +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3767 +++$+++ 3767 +++$+++ 2011-03-05 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.299351600E09 +++$+++ WikiProject Women's History needs members' input on implementing auto-assessment. You'll find the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History#Auto-assessment]]. Best wishes,  +++$+++ :WikiProject Women's History needs members' input on implementing auto-assessment. You'll find the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History#Auto-assessment]]. Best wishes, [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 11:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

576242 +++$+++ RyanFreisling +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-26 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.198708260E09 +++$+++ And I'd be remiss if I didn't offer a (somewhat belated) Merry Happy Holiday Season to the MONGO! Hope this year brings you fulfillment, challenges, happiness and peace. --  +++$+++ And I'd be remiss if I didn't offer a (somewhat belated) Merry Happy Holiday Season to the MONGO! Hope this year brings you fulfillment, challenges, happiness and peace. -- [[User:RyanFreisling]] [[User_talk:RyanFreisling|@]] 14:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
576243 +++$+++ Junglecat +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576242 +++$+++ 576242 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.198742580E09 +++$+++ Seasons Greetings - I hope your Christmas was very good and upcoming New Year is very enjoyable.  +++$+++ :Seasons Greetings - I hope your Christmas was very good and upcoming New Year is very enjoyable. [[User:Junglecat|<font color="green">JungleCat</font>]]  <small>[[User talk:Junglecat|<font color="blue">Shiny!</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Junglecat|<font color="blue">Oohhh!</font>]]</small> 00:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
576244 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576242 +++$+++ 576243 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.198753080E09 +++$+++ Thank you.-- +++$+++ ::Thank you.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 02:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

265917 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265917 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-04 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.165219440E09 +++$+++ It is not sad when you are hopeful, but sad when you are discouraged.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ It is not sad when you are hopeful, but sad when you are discouraged.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 00:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
265918 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265917 +++$+++ 265917 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.165221960E09 +++$+++ Thank you for letting me know how you are feeling.  Sadly, I sometimes have difficulty understanding what might upset you.  Please accept my apologies if I have offended, and my regrets that I may repeat my offense until I have better understanding.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :Thank you for letting me know how you are feeling.  Sadly, I sometimes have difficulty understanding what might upset you.  Please accept my apologies if I have offended, and my regrets that I may repeat my offense until I have better understanding.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 00:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
265919 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265917 +++$+++ 265918 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.165224420E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your analogy.  I don't think the case about not negotiating with murderers is all that clear cut.  Suppose a group of unarmed people are confronted by a group of armed murderers.  Would it not be appropriate to try to reason with them, to attempt to persuade them '''voluntarily''' not to slaughter the group?  Of course the situation is different if you have the power to stop the murderers and voluntarily '''allow''' them to murder.  Moving from the analogy back to Wikipedia, I think it would have been very risky for a small number of editors to battle with the 4 pro-link editors until it drew attention.  Without the express backing of the community, such a course risks blocking and banning.  Does that make sense?  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Thank you for your analogy.  I don't think the case about not negotiating with murderers is all that clear cut.  Suppose a group of unarmed people are confronted by a group of armed murderers.  Would it not be appropriate to try to reason with them, to attempt to persuade them '''voluntarily''' not to slaughter the group?  Of course the situation is different if you have the power to stop the murderers and voluntarily '''allow''' them to murder.  Moving from the analogy back to Wikipedia, I think it would have been very risky for a small number of editors to battle with the 4 pro-link editors until it drew attention.  Without the express backing of the community, such a course risks blocking and banning.  Does that make sense?  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 01:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
265920 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265917 +++$+++ 265919 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.165271280E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  I think I have some understanding of your position, although I am certainly not confident that I understand it fully.  As inaccurately as I do understand, however, I have been unable to reconcile my wish not to offend you, with my wish to do my duty.  As I see it, it is my duty to attempt to use discussion to resolve disputes, even if the attempt is likely to fail.  If I have not misunderstood your position too greatly, then I must ask for your forgiveness for how I will behave.    Please do not feel obligated to grant such forgiveness.  I will not think of you less one way or the other.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::Hi Mattisse.  I think I have some understanding of your position, although I am certainly not confident that I understand it fully.  As inaccurately as I do understand, however, I have been unable to reconcile my wish not to offend you, with my wish to do my duty.  As I see it, it is my duty to attempt to use discussion to resolve disputes, even if the attempt is likely to fail.  If I have not misunderstood your position too greatly, then I must ask for your forgiveness for how I will behave.    Please do not feel obligated to grant such forgiveness.  I will not think of you less one way or the other.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 14:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

3777 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-27 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.301221440E09 +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes-->  +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 03:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
3778 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3777 +++$+++ 3777 +++$+++ 2011-03-27 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.301221620E09 +++$+++ sigh. -  +++$+++ :sigh. - [[User:PKM|PKM]] ([[User talk:PKM#top|talk]]) 03:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

265923 +++$+++ Ekajati +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-04 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.165274040E09 +++$+++ I'm curious why you have never admitted to wrongdoing with respect to your use of sockpuppets or apologized to [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]] and others for manipulating them using sockpuppets. Do you not think it was wrong? Do you not think that the people you used them on don't deserve an apology? Personally, I think you are completely unrepentitent about your past actions, and don't even see or want to admit that much of the current situation was manipulated into existence by your actions (i.e. demanding citations in a threatening manner). [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]] was a newbie and you [[WP:BITE|bit]] him in a quite nasty manner. Can't you see yourself from the outside view?  +++$+++ I'm curious why you have never admitted to wrongdoing with respect to your use of sockpuppets or apologized to [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]] and others for manipulating them using sockpuppets. Do you not think it was wrong? Do you not think that the people you used them on don't deserve an apology? Personally, I think you are completely unrepentitent about your past actions, and don't even see or want to admit that much of the current situation was manipulated into existence by your actions (i.e. demanding citations in a threatening manner). [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]] was a newbie and you [[WP:BITE|bit]] him in a quite nasty manner. Can't you see yourself from the outside view? [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] ([[User talk:Ekajati|yakity-yak]]) 15:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
265924 +++$+++ Addhoc +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265923 +++$+++ 265923 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.165275420E09 +++$+++ Hi Ekajati, the RfC clearly supported Mattisse - I suggest you get over this. In future, could you avoid posting on this talk page. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Hi Ekajati, the RfC clearly supported Mattisse - I suggest you get over this. In future, could you avoid posting on this talk page. Thanks, [[User:Addhoc|Addhoc]] 15:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

265926 +++$+++ Ars Scriptor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265926 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-05 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.165363380E09 +++$+++ Just letting you know that [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Hanuman Das]] has been opened by {{user|BostonMA}} to document the fact that {{user|Hanuman Das}} has stated that he intends to create disruptive sockpuppet accounts, and has indeed done so already.  This disruption was petty and silly, but it should be noted that he believes you got away with similar behavior and therefore he is justified in doing the same.  Regardless of what happened with your checkuser and RfC, I intend to put a stop to any harassment you are experiencing, especially while dispute resolution is ongoing.  Please do not hesitate to inform me of any harassment you experience, or other disruption you witness that violates policies. --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ Just letting you know that [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Hanuman Das]] has been opened by {{user|BostonMA}} to document the fact that {{user|Hanuman Das}} has stated that he intends to create disruptive sockpuppet accounts, and has indeed done so already.  This disruption was petty and silly, but it should be noted that he believes you got away with similar behavior and therefore he is justified in doing the same.  Regardless of what happened with your checkuser and RfC, I intend to put a stop to any harassment you are experiencing, especially while dispute resolution is ongoing.  Please do not hesitate to inform me of any harassment you experience, or other disruption you witness that violates policies. --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Ars Scriptor|Ars Scriptor]] </font> 16:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
265927 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265926 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.165397640E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that, multiple people posted on my talk page overnight and I simply didn't notice your comment. In case you haven't seen elsewhere, I'm done with the whole thing. Let the others thrash it out. No need to reply. I won't post on your talk page again (at least on ''this'' topic). My apologies for missing your comment. &mdash; +++$+++ ::Sorry about that, multiple people posted on my talk page overnight and I simply didn't notice your comment. In case you haven't seen elsewhere, I'm done with the whole thing. Let the others thrash it out. No need to reply. I won't post on your talk page again (at least on ''this'' topic). My apologies for missing your comment. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 01:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
265928 +++$+++ Ars Scriptor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265926 +++$+++ 265926 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.165368300E09 +++$+++ I advised Pigman to open the RfC on the Starwood page to accomplish one thing: get the view of outside editors about all the Starwood linking.  And I mean the internal links too, not just the spam links to the rosencomet site.  If the community supports it, most of the links can be removed. --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ :I advised Pigman to open the RfC on the Starwood page to accomplish one thing: get the view of outside editors about all the Starwood linking.  And I mean the internal links too, not just the spam links to the rosencomet site.  If the community supports it, most of the links can be removed. --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Ars Scriptor|Ars Scriptor]] </font> 17:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

3784 +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-14 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.302829080E09 +++$+++ With pleasure. The last article I worked on which related to that was [[Teotitl\xe1n del Valle]] a town in the state of [[Oaxaca]] known for the weaving of rugs colored with natural dyes.(got one in my living room)  Right now Im working on getting the [[Museo de Arte Popular, Mexico City]] on board with GLAM. There might be an opportunity for collaboration there. +++$+++ With pleasure. The last article I worked on which related to that was [[Teotitlán del Valle]] a town in the state of [[Oaxaca]] known for the weaving of rugs colored with natural dyes.(got one in my living room)  Right now Im working on getting the [[Museo de Arte Popular, Mexico City]] on board with GLAM. There might be an opportunity for collaboration there.[[User:Thelmadatter|Thelmadatter]] ([[User talk:Thelmadatter|talk]]) 17:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
3785 +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3784 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-14 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.302829440E09 +++$+++ Gosh I forgot a more important article I wrote [[Textiles of Mexico]] +++$+++ ::Gosh I forgot a more important article I wrote [[Textiles of Mexico]][[User:Thelmadatter|Thelmadatter]] ([[User talk:Thelmadatter|talk]]) 18:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

612300 +++$+++ Lord Loxley +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612300 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-02 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.151849640E09 +++$+++ I don't know, Paterson...perhaps you've got this idea that only your favoured perception of history is right or even important enough to discuss.  The ability to write a book and have it published in the annals of history, doesn't make you invincible with all that you attempted to cover in the subject-matter.  Other people are going to come at things from other perspectives.  It's life.   +++$+++ I don't know, Paterson...perhaps you've got this idea that only your favoured perception of history is right or even important enough to discuss.  The ability to write a book and have it published in the annals of history, doesn't make you invincible with all that you attempted to cover in the subject-matter.  Other people are going to come at things from other perspectives.  It's life.  [[User:Lord Loxley|Lord Loxley]] 07:14, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
612301 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612300 +++$+++ 612300 +++$+++ 2006-07-02 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.151852460E09 +++$+++ Both of you, please remember that the following policies are mandatory: [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]] and [[Wikipedia:No original research]]. The balance between perspectives must accord with [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]], which is certainly not a licence for confusing asides. [[WP:V|The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth]], and where I've disagreed with Rcpaterson my further research has backed his version: that won't stop me trying to find alternative current [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|Reliable sources]], remembering of course that they must be \"directly related to the topic of the article\". Now I'd better read these again myself! .. +++$+++ :Both of you, please remember that the following policies are mandatory: [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]] and [[Wikipedia:No original research]]. The balance between perspectives must accord with [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]], which is certainly not a licence for confusing asides. [[WP:V|The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth]], and where I've disagreed with Rcpaterson my further research has backed his version: that won't stop me trying to find alternative current [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|Reliable sources]], remembering of course that they must be "directly related to the topic of the article". Now I'd better read these again myself! ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 08:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

3789 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-03 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.304407140E09 +++$+++ It is indeed very useful, but has its quirks. You often need to add the destination category as a parent to the one you are working on so that it appears, & then remove it later. Also if the one you are working on his lots of sub-\/parent cats, only some will appear. I have a dummy category beginning aaa (it keeps getting deleted) & I move them there first, then to the final destination. Also you can't look at the image pages while selecting, so a form of [[Kim's Game]] applies.  +++$+++ It is indeed very useful, but has its quirks. You often need to add the destination category as a parent to the one you are working on so that it appears, & then remove it later. Also if the one you are working on his lots of sub-/parent cats, only some will appear. I have a dummy category beginning aaa (it keeps getting deleted) & I move them there first, then to the final destination. Also you can't look at the image pages while selecting, so a form of [[Kim's Game]] applies. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 00:19, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
3790 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3789 +++$+++ 3789 +++$+++ 2011-05-03 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.304414280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that heads-up. -  +++$+++ :Thanks for that heads-up. - [[User:PKM|PKM]] ([[User talk:PKM#top|talk]]) 02:18, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
3791 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3789 +++$+++ 3789 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.304501700E09 +++$+++ Thank you!  Yum! -  +++$+++ :Thank you!  Yum! - [[User:PKM|PKM]] ([[User talk:PKM#top|talk]]) 02:35, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

265934 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.165397400E09 +++$+++ P.S. Okay, this is really the last word, but I figured I should tell you that I closed the RfC on you. &mdash; +++$+++ P.S. Okay, this is really the last word, but I figured I should tell you that I closed the RfC on you. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 01:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
265935 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265934 +++$+++ 265934 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.165397880E09 +++$+++ Lster in the movie. The house looks like a [[Frank Lloyd Wright]] house and is improbably set on top of [[Mount Rushmore]]. Ring any bells? &mdash; +++$+++ :Lster in the movie. The house looks like a [[Frank Lloyd Wright]] house and is improbably set on top of [[Mount Rushmore]]. Ring any bells? &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 01:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
265936 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265934 +++$+++ 265935 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.165399560E09 +++$+++ Rent it some time. It's a really excellent one. :-) &mdash; +++$+++ ::Rent it some time. It's a really excellent one. :-) &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 02:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

265938 +++$+++ Paul_Pigman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-07 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.165486380E09 +++$+++ Hmm... The link seems to work for me. I don't know what to tell you. -- +++$+++ Hmm... The link seems to work for me. I don't know what to tell you. --[[User:Paul_Pigman|'''Pigman''']] ([[User talk:Paul_Pigman|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Paul_Pigman|contribs]]) 02:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
265939 +++$+++ Paul_Pigman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265938 +++$+++ 265938 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.165487040E09 +++$+++ I use Firefox too so that shouldn't be the problem. Usually I \"right-click\" on the link and then open it in a new tab but just clicking on it works for me. I'll make it an external link, that should work more consistently. Obviously your browser is handling the link differently than mine. -- +++$+++ :I use Firefox too so that shouldn't be the problem. Usually I "right-click" on the link and then open it in a new tab but just clicking on it works for me. I'll make it an external link, that should work more consistently. Obviously your browser is handling the link differently than mine. --[[User:Paul_Pigman|'''Pigman''']] ([[User talk:Paul_Pigman|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Paul_Pigman|contribs]]) 02:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
265940 +++$+++ Paul_Pigman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265938 +++$+++ 265938 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.165487700E09 +++$+++ Try the one on the starwood mediation page now. It should have a lock next to it. Tell me if it now works for you. -- +++$+++ :Try the one on the starwood mediation page now. It should have a lock next to it. Tell me if it now works for you. --[[User:Paul_Pigman|'''Pigman''']] ([[User talk:Paul_Pigman|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Paul_Pigman|contribs]]) 02:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

528084 +++$+++ Dalillama +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-26 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.188118260E09 +++$+++ Could please explain to me the rationale for deleting that image. I'm assuming it failed some fair use criteria, but the rationale was there, so I don't know why it was CSD'ed. Thanks!-- +++$+++ Could please explain to me the rationale for deleting that image. I'm assuming it failed some fair use criteria, but the rationale was there, so I don't know why it was CSD'ed. Thanks!--[[User:Dalillama|Dali-Llama]] 01:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
528085 +++$+++ Dalillama +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528084 +++$+++ 528084 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.188196560E09 +++$+++ Demon, I would appreciate a reply. Mentioning an \"invalid fair use rationale\" as a CSD means that part of my argument is wrong. If it percolates to other images I've uploaded, I'd like to know.-- +++$+++ :Demon, I would appreciate a reply. Mentioning an "invalid fair use rationale" as a CSD means that part of my argument is wrong. If it percolates to other images I've uploaded, I'd like to know.--[[User:Dalillama|Dali-Llama]] 23:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
528086 +++$+++ Dalillama +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528084 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.188386100E09 +++$+++ So, I gave a rationale for the use in an article ([[TAM Linhas A\xe9reas]]), for which I gave a rationale. Then someone else came in and used it in a different article (I think it was \"List of Flag Carriers\" or something), but didn't provide a rationale. So you deleted a picture which had a perfectly good fair use rationale, although someone else improperly used it later. That doesn't seem wrong to you? How about removing the image from the article it didn't have a rationale for? I'm sorry, but this a bad, bad deletion. And if it was according to policy, it's a asinine policy.-- +++$+++ :::So, I gave a rationale for the use in an article ([[TAM Linhas Aéreas]]), for which I gave a rationale. Then someone else came in and used it in a different article (I think it was "List of Flag Carriers" or something), but didn't provide a rationale. So you deleted a picture which had a perfectly good fair use rationale, although someone else improperly used it later. That doesn't seem wrong to you? How about removing the image from the article it didn't have a rationale for? I'm sorry, but this a bad, bad deletion. And if it was according to policy, it's a asinine policy.--[[User:Dalillama|Dali-Llama]] 04:15, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

3797 +++$+++ Modernist +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-27 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.306519080E09 +++$+++ Hi Johnbod I thought you would find this interesting [http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/05\/27\/arts\/design\/illuminating-fashion-at-morgan-library-museum-review.html?src=un&feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fjson8.nytimes.com%2Fpages%2Farts%2Fdesign%2Findex.jsonp]... +++$+++ Hi Johnbod I thought you would find this interesting [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/27/arts/design/illuminating-fashion-at-morgan-library-museum-review.html?src=un&feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fjson8.nytimes.com%2Fpages%2Farts%2Fdesign%2Findex.jsonp]...[[User:Modernist|Modernist]] ([[User talk:Modernist|talk]]) 10:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
3798 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3797 +++$+++ 3797 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.306519260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that - sounds great. Sadly I don't think I'll be seeing it. I'll tell [[User:PKM]] too.  +++$+++ :Thanks for that - sounds great. Sadly I don't think I'll be seeing it. I'll tell [[User:PKM]] too. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod#top|talk]]) 11:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
3799 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3797 +++$+++ 3798 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.306537260E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I actually know about this one - trying to get there in June (I have to be in NY on business). -  +++$+++ ::Thanks.  I actually know about this one - trying to get there in June (I have to be in NY on business). - [[User:PKM|PKM]] ([[User talk:PKM#top|talk]]) 16:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

265942 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-07 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.165537560E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I just saw [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Ars_Scriptor&curid=4222187&diff=92718540&oldid=92713234 this explanation].  Please let me know if you do not appreciate some unsolicited advice.  You refer to the Flinders account as an account identified as a sock puppet of yours.  Although this is ambiguous, someone might interpret that as a hint that the account may have been misidentified as yours.  I think you should clearly state whether it was or was not your account, just to keep the atmosphere clear.  Just my opinion, and please feel free to disgree.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I just saw [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ars_Scriptor&curid=4222187&diff=92718540&oldid=92713234 this explanation].  Please let me know if you do not appreciate some unsolicited advice.  You refer to the Flinders account as an account identified as a sock puppet of yours.  Although this is ambiguous, someone might interpret that as a hint that the account may have been misidentified as yours.  I think you should clearly state whether it was or was not your account, just to keep the atmosphere clear.  Just my opinion, and please feel free to disgree.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 16:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
265943 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265942 +++$+++ 265942 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.165539000E09 +++$+++ I would understand the term \"my sockpuppets\" to mean \"me, using an   account under an alias\".  It is not clear whether you are using the term the same way that I would understand it.  I know that you explained yourself to an admin back in August.  I don't mean to pry.  I am just a bit confused.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :I would understand the term "my sockpuppets" to mean "me, using an   account under an alias".  It is not clear whether you are using the term the same way that I would understand it.  I know that you explained yourself to an admin back in August.  I don't mean to pry.  I am just a bit confused.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 16:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
265944 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265942 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.165545420E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your explanation.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::Thank you for your explanation.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
265945 +++$+++ Ars Scriptor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265942 +++$+++ 265943 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.165540020E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I appreciate your explanation but with all due respect, what do you expect me to do in this situation?  What would you do in my shoes?  You haven't outright denied that Flinders is you, nor have you admitted it, but surely you can't claim that it's just a coincidence that a confirmed sockpuppet of yours happened to create an article that discredits people you are having a dispute with?  I will take whatever action is necessary, as I did with Hanuman Das, to prevent this from wasting anyone else's time.  I have posted to [[WP:AN\/I]] asking for advice as well. --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ ::Mattisse, I appreciate your explanation but with all due respect, what do you expect me to do in this situation?  What would you do in my shoes?  You haven't outright denied that Flinders is you, nor have you admitted it, but surely you can't claim that it's just a coincidence that a confirmed sockpuppet of yours happened to create an article that discredits people you are having a dispute with?  I will take whatever action is necessary, as I did with Hanuman Das, to prevent this from wasting anyone else's time.  I have posted to [[WP:AN/I]] asking for advice as well. --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Ars Scriptor|Ars Scriptor]] </font> 17:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
265946 +++$+++ Addhoc +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265942 +++$+++ 265945 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.165544460E09 +++$+++ Hello everyone. I'm not sure what is expected of me either. As it happens I've prodded the article. If anyone wants to salvage it, that's fine - I won't take it to AfD. Hope that's ok.  +++$+++ :::Hello everyone. I'm not sure what is expected of me either. As it happens I've prodded the article. If anyone wants to salvage it, that's fine - I won't take it to AfD. Hope that's ok. [[User:Addhoc|Addhoc]] 18:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

3800 +++$+++ Tbennert +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3800 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-01 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.306925340E09 +++$+++ Hello! A long time ago you had offered assistance if I needed, so I'm taking you up on your offer :)  I roughly know that government publications are public domain, and that we can use public domain pictures.  I've created several articles using http:\/\/www.nzhistory.net.nz\/biographies\/all and http:\/\/leg.mt.gov\/css\/find%20a%20legislator.asp.  Are the pictures on these okay to add to Commons?  And help on telling what is public domain and not so I can not ask everytime would be great. Thanks for the help! -- +++$+++ Hello! A long time ago you had offered assistance if I needed, so I'm taking you up on your offer :)  I roughly know that government publications are public domain, and that we can use public domain pictures.  I've created several articles using http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/biographies/all and http://leg.mt.gov/css/find%20a%20legislator.asp.  Are the pictures on these okay to add to Commons?  And help on telling what is public domain and not so I can not ask everytime would be great. Thanks for the help! --[[User:Tbennert|Tbennert]] ([[User talk:Tbennert|talk]]) 03:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
3801 +++$+++ Tbennert +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3800 +++$+++ 3800 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.307008200E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the in-depth answer!  It was just what I was looking for.  -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the in-depth answer!  It was just what I was looking for.  --[[User:Tbennert|Tbennert]] ([[User talk:Tbennert|talk]]) 02:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

265947 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-07 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.165560000E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I thought I should let you know that you are being discussed at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&oldid=92820569#Mattisse_redux Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#Mattisse redux].  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I thought I should let you know that you are being discussed at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=92820569#Mattisse_redux Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Mattisse redux].  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
265948 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265947 +++$+++ 265947 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.165562580E09 +++$+++ I am in the same boat as [[User:Addhoc]], trying to make sense of the situation.  -- +++$+++ :I am in the same boat as [[User:Addhoc]], trying to make sense of the situation.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

3805 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3805 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.307942820E09 +++$+++ {{Wikipedia:WikiProject United States\/Newsletter\/Newsletter link|June 2011}}-- +++$+++ {{Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/Newsletter/Newsletter link|June 2011}}--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 22:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
3806 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ 3805 +++$+++ 3805 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308781320E09 +++$+++ Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives\u2014which houses some of America's most important historical documents\u2014is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/NARA\/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]].  +++$+++ :Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]]. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

528095 +++$+++ Vassyana +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528095 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-30 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.188534120E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | You tirelessly work towards the improvement of Wikipedia and ensuring that Wikipedia's policies and guidelines are enforced. In particular, your closure of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of Akatsuki members]] was brave and intelligent. You applied the rules of Wikipedia and treated the discussion as such, instead of a vote. Good work!!! We need more people like you around.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You tirelessly work towards the improvement of Wikipedia and ensuring that Wikipedia's policies and guidelines are enforced. In particular, your closure of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Akatsuki members]] was brave and intelligent. You applied the rules of Wikipedia and treated the discussion as such, instead of a vote. Good work!!! We need more people like you around. [[User:Vassyana|Vassyana]] 21:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
528096 +++$+++ Durin +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528095 +++$+++ 528095 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.188534300E09 +++$+++ What the heck are you talking about? Don't you know he's a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Akatsuki_%28Naruto%29&diff=154659187&oldid=154656017 third rate admin]? :) -- +++$+++ *What the heck are you talking about? Don't you know he's a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Akatsuki_%28Naruto%29&diff=154659187&oldid=154656017 third rate admin]? :) --[[User:Durin|Durin]] 21:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
528097 +++$+++ Vassyana +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528095 +++$+++ 528096 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.188534420E09 +++$+++ If defending basic quality control is third-rate, downgrade me too. :D  +++$+++ **If defending basic quality control is third-rate, downgrade me too. :D [[User:Vassyana|Vassyana]] 21:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
528098 +++$+++ Durin +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528095 +++$+++ 528097 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.188534480E09 +++$+++ Me too. Except, I'm not an admin. They stuck me down in [[Steerage]]. -- +++$+++ ***Me too. Except, I'm not an admin. They stuck me down in [[Steerage]]. --[[User:Durin|Durin]] 21:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

265952 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-08 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.165608060E09 +++$+++ Yesterday was a very sad day.  I am certainly to blame for contributing to your woes.   My vanity and pride told me, \"I am smart\", \"I know what to do\", \"I am good at conflict resolution\".  I listened to my pride and so I gave you advice and asked you a question that I thought would help resolve the situation.  I was a fool and the situation became worse.  I am deeply sorry.  If our paths do not cross again, I will miss you as well.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Yesterday was a very sad day.  I am certainly to blame for contributing to your woes.   My vanity and pride told me, "I am smart", "I know what to do", "I am good at conflict resolution".  I listened to my pride and so I gave you advice and asked you a question that I thought would help resolve the situation.  I was a fool and the situation became worse.  I am deeply sorry.  If our paths do not cross again, I will miss you as well.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 12:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
265953 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265952 +++$+++ 265952 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.165633800E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your kind words.  Yesterday weighs heavily in me, but I think I ought to function again rather than withdraw.  -- +++$+++ :Thank you for your kind words.  Yesterday weighs heavily in me, but I think I ought to function again rather than withdraw.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 19:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
265954 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265952 +++$+++ 265953 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.165634460E09 +++$+++ Yes, I am back, and I hope you are feeling OK today. -- +++$+++ ::Yes, I am back, and I hope you are feeling OK today. --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 19:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

265955 +++$+++ Ars Scriptor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-08 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.165631820E09 +++$+++ You asked me not to post on your Talk page, but you keep leaving me notes.  Are you inviting me to talk again?  --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ You asked me not to post on your Talk page, but you keep leaving me notes.  Are you inviting me to talk again?  --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Ars Scriptor|Ars Scriptor]] </font> 18:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
265956 +++$+++ Ars Scriptor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265955 +++$+++ 265955 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.165635660E09 +++$+++ I'm honestly sorry that you were offended by my \"Mattisse redux\" post.  I was only asking for advice, and I didn't mean to embarrass or ridicule you.  I offer you an [[olive branch]], which I will understand if you do not accept, but I'm here to help you if you need it. --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ :I'm honestly sorry that you were offended by my "Mattisse redux" post.  I was only asking for advice, and I didn't mean to embarrass or ridicule you.  I offer you an [[olive branch]], which I will understand if you do not accept, but I'm here to help you if you need it. --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Ars Scriptor|Ars Scriptor]] </font> 19:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
265957 +++$+++ Ars Scriptor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265955 +++$+++ 265956 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.165639080E09 +++$+++ From what you posted about {{user|999}}, it looks like he was using your Contributions page to see what you were editing. Whenever you are looking at someone's user page or Talk page, you can click '''User contributions''' in the '''toolbox''' and see what edits they have made.  This is part of the transparency of Wikipedia - anyone can see what anyone else is doing.  Everything is public.  Since you felt that he was purposely following you around and reverting your edits (sometimes referred to as [[WP:STALK|wikistalking]], that would be a time when you would want to contact an admin and let them know what's going on. --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ ::From what you posted about {{user|999}}, it looks like he was using your Contributions page to see what you were editing. Whenever you are looking at someone's user page or Talk page, you can click '''User contributions''' in the '''toolbox''' and see what edits they have made.  This is part of the transparency of Wikipedia - anyone can see what anyone else is doing.  Everything is public.  Since you felt that he was purposely following you around and reverting your edits (sometimes referred to as [[WP:STALK|wikistalking]], that would be a time when you would want to contact an admin and let them know what's going on. --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Ars Scriptor|Ars Scriptor]] </font> 20:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
265958 +++$+++ Ars Scriptor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265955 +++$+++ 265957 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.165640280E09 +++$+++ I would like to spend some time thinking about your message about [[Peggy Sue]] before I respond with the best way to deal with situations like that.  I am taking a brief Wikibreak so I will message you when I get back.  --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ :::I would like to spend some time thinking about your message about [[Peggy Sue]] before I respond with the best way to deal with situations like that.  I am taking a brief Wikibreak so I will message you when I get back.  --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Ars Scriptor|Ars Scriptor]] </font> 20:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

542968 +++$+++ JonBroxton +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542968 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-29 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.304130480E09 +++$+++ I believe the photographer is [[User:Tedzsee]]. I simply took his photo and cropped it a little so it was a better headshot of the player. All the right and ownership of the photo belongs to him.  +++$+++ I believe the photographer is [[User:Tedzsee]]. I simply took his photo and cropped it a little so it was a better headshot of the player. All the right and ownership of the photo belongs to him. [[User:JonBroxton|JonBroxton]] ([[User talk:JonBroxton|talk]]) 19:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
542969 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542968 +++$+++ 542968 +++$+++ 2011-04-29 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.304131560E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Replied on [[User_talk:JonBroxton#File:Goldbergcropped.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :Thank you. Replied on [[User_talk:JonBroxton#File:Goldbergcropped.jpg]]. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 19:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

528101 +++$+++ Chubbles +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528101 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-31 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.188544500E09 +++$+++ Also, the uploader does not appear to have been notified: the uploader was [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]], and I do not see a warning in the last month of that user's talk page history.  +++$+++ Also, the uploader does not appear to have been notified: the uploader was [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]], and I do not see a warning in the last month of that user's talk page history. [[User:Chubbles|Chubbles]] 00:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
528102 +++$+++ KrytenKoro +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528101 +++$+++ 528101 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.188548580E09 +++$+++ I gave a ''link'' to a third-party source that covered Naruto. It specifically portrays it in out-of-universe form, and is both highly visible and easily verifiable. Aren't you supposed to listen to everyone's arguments in such a controversial AfD, and not just stereotype the side you disagree with? +++$+++ :I gave a ''link'' to a third-party source that covered Naruto. It specifically portrays it in out-of-universe form, and is both highly visible and easily verifiable. Aren't you supposed to listen to everyone's arguments in such a controversial AfD, and not just stereotype the side you disagree with?[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] 01:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

3815 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-02 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.246545240E09 +++$+++ I'll try it, BRB ---'''<font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ I'll try it, BRB ---'''<font color="black">[[User:Scarce|Scarce]]</font>''' <font color="silver">||||</font> ''<font color="green">[[User talk:Scarce|Talk]]</font>'' -''<font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Scarce|Contrib.]]</font>''--- 07:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
3816 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3815 +++$+++ 3815 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.246545360E09 +++$+++ What's the difference? ---'''<font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ :What's the difference? ---'''<font color="black">[[User:Scarce|Scarce]]</font>''' <font color="silver">||||</font> ''<font color="green">[[User talk:Scarce|Talk]]</font>'' -''<font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Scarce|Contrib.]]</font>''--- 07:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
3817 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3815 +++$+++ 3816 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.246545900E09 +++$+++ What is it that you don't understand? The changes I made or why they were necessary? \u2014 +++$+++ ::What is it that you don't understand? The changes I made or why they were necessary? —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 07:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
3818 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3815 +++$+++ 3817 +++$+++ 2009-07-03 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.246625460E09 +++$+++ Hm, those didn't work either, I don't know what's going wrong? ---'''<font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ :::Hm, those didn't work either, I don't know what's going wrong? ---'''<font color="black">[[User:Scarce|Scarce]]</font>''' <font color="silver">||||</font> ''<font color="green">[[User talk:Scarce|Talk]]</font>'' -''<font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Scarce|Contrib.]]</font>''--- 05:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
3819 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3815 +++$+++ 3818 +++$+++ 2009-07-03 06:23:00 +++$+++ 1.246627380E09 +++$+++ Try again with my new versions. (It needed quotes around \"gray\"). \u2014 +++$+++ ::::Try again with my new versions. (It needed quotes around "gray"). —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 06:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

265960 +++$+++ NinaEliza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-08 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.165649280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:NinaEliza|NinaEliza]] 23:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
265961 +++$+++ NinaEliza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265960 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.165650660E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::[[User:NinaEliza|NinaEliza]] 23:51, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

528105 +++$+++  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-31 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.188594480E09 +++$+++ ''\"When to use categories : Categories help users find information, even if they don't know that it exists or what it's called.\"'' this also applies, a newcomer willing to get some sympathetic ear after been bitten, will go to the category to find a Wikipedian who knows what a newcomer may suffer through misunderstanding and who can explain them what is going on. You very well know that not all Wikipedians are equal. The category stays. [[WP:VANISH|Vanished user]] 14:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ ''"When to use categories : Categories help users find information, even if they don't know that it exists or what it's called."'' this also applies, a newcomer willing to get some sympathetic ear after been bitten, will go to the category to find a Wikipedian who knows what a newcomer may suffer through misunderstanding and who can explain them what is going on. You very well know that not all Wikipedians are equal. The category stays. [[WP:VANISH|Vanished user]] 14:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
528106 +++$+++ Durin +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528105 +++$+++ 528105 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.188594660E09 +++$+++ No, all wikipedia editors in good standing ARE equal. That's the essential philosophy behind Wikipedia. Nobody, not Jimbo, bureaucrats, arbcom members, administrators or checkusers are any higher on the hierarchy than the first time editor making their first good faith edit.  -- +++$+++ *No, all wikipedia editors in good standing ARE equal. That's the essential philosophy behind Wikipedia. Nobody, not Jimbo, bureaucrats, arbcom members, administrators or checkusers are any higher on the hierarchy than the first time editor making their first good faith edit.  --[[User:Durin|Durin]] 14:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
528107 +++$+++ The Norse +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528105 +++$+++ 528105 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.188604740E09 +++$+++ How about responding to the topics above then as long as you're not caring about this one? -  +++$+++ :How about responding to the topics above then as long as you're not caring about this one? - [[User:The Norse|The Norse]] 16:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

265962 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-09 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.165734660E09 +++$+++ Please stop telling other people that I am stalking you. I am not. If you post a comment on a user page that I am watching, I will see it and may respond to it. I don't even have you on my watch list. &mdash; +++$+++ Please stop telling other people that I am stalking you. I am not. If you post a comment on a user page that I am watching, I will see it and may respond to it. I don't even have you on my watch list. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 23:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
265963 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265962 +++$+++ 265962 +++$+++ 2006-12-09 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.165734720E09 +++$+++ Stop stalking me and I will. Thanks. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Stop stalking me and I will. Thanks. Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 23:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
265964 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265962 +++$+++ 265963 +++$+++ 2006-12-09 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.165735140E09 +++$+++ I'm not stalking you Mattisse. I have [[User:Ars Scriptor|Ars Scriptor]], [[User:Addhoc|Addhoc]], [[User:CheNuevara|CheNuevara]] and [[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] on my watchlist. I will see whatever you post on those pages. That is '''NOT STALKING!''' &mdash; +++$+++ ::I'm not stalking you Mattisse. I have [[User:Ars Scriptor|Ars Scriptor]], [[User:Addhoc|Addhoc]], [[User:CheNuevara|CheNuevara]] and [[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] on my watchlist. I will see whatever you post on those pages. That is '''NOT STALKING!''' &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 23:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

3821 +++$+++ CornfieldMannequin +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3821 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-09 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.247132520E09 +++$+++ In reference to [[User_talk:CornfieldMannequin#File_permission_problem_with_File:Dilbert_PHB.JPG| your message]], no, I am not [[Scott_Adams| Scott Adams]]. At the time, the licensing said something about \"''I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the '''public domain'''. This applies worldwide.''\" The licensing goes on to say, \"''In case this is not legally possible, I grant anyone the right to use this work '''for any purpose''', without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.''\" That, '''TEB728''', means that particular image falls under being ''not'' legally possible and ''with'' conditions. While I realize that I am not the \"copyright holder\" of the image, I did make sure to mention that Scott Adams was the author of the work, and that the image was cropped, and therefore edited, from the original work. I would still like that image to be on the article, though: it is very descriptive of the character it portrays.-- +++$+++ In reference to [[User_talk:CornfieldMannequin#File_permission_problem_with_File:Dilbert_PHB.JPG| your message]], no, I am not [[Scott_Adams| Scott Adams]]. At the time, the licensing said something about "''I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the '''public domain'''. This applies worldwide.''" The licensing goes on to say, "''In case this is not legally possible, I grant anyone the right to use this work '''for any purpose''', without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.''" That, '''TEB728''', means that particular image falls under being ''not'' legally possible and ''with'' conditions. While I realize that I am not the "copyright holder" of the image, I did make sure to mention that Scott Adams was the author of the work, and that the image was cropped, and therefore edited, from the original work. I would still like that image to be on the article, though: it is very descriptive of the character it portrays.--[[User:CornfieldMannequin|CornfieldMannequin]] ([[User talk:CornfieldMannequin|talk]]) 02:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
3822 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3821 +++$+++ 3821 +++$+++ 2009-07-09 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.247134980E09 +++$+++ Scott Adams is the copyright owner of that image. Only he can release the into the image into the public domain or grant anyone the right to use it or to modify it. Cropping the image was itself a copyright violation and does not give you a copyright on the cropped image. Since you are not Scott Adams, your claim of being the copyright owner was '''false'''. \u2014 +++$+++ :Scott Adams is the copyright owner of that image. Only he can release the into the image into the public domain or grant anyone the right to use it or to modify it. Cropping the image was itself a copyright violation and does not give you a copyright on the cropped image. Since you are not Scott Adams, your claim of being the copyright owner was '''false'''. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 03:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

265966 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265966 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-10 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.165747860E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I was able to find pictures of [[Canyon Sainte-Anne]] with Creative Commons licensing.  Hope your day went well.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I was able to find pictures of [[Canyon Sainte-Anne]] with Creative Commons licensing.  Hope your day went well.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 02:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
265967 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265966 +++$+++ 265966 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.165749000E09 +++$+++ Just a few days ago I saw on someone's page a specialized watch page.  I set one up for myself at [[User:BostonMA\/India Watchlist]].  Just click on the link in the instructions, and it shows you the recent history of all the articles mentioned on the page.  It is much more detailed than the \"my watchlist\" at the top of your page, (I assume at the top of your page), but that also makes it longer for the number of articles you are watching.  Anyway, I can show you how to set one up if you are interested.  Goodnight my friend, -- +++$+++ :Just a few days ago I saw on someone's page a specialized watch page.  I set one up for myself at [[User:BostonMA/India Watchlist]].  Just click on the link in the instructions, and it shows you the recent history of all the articles mentioned on the page.  It is much more detailed than the "my watchlist" at the top of your page, (I assume at the top of your page), but that also makes it longer for the number of articles you are watching.  Anyway, I can show you how to set one up if you are interested.  Goodnight my friend, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 03:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
265968 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265966 +++$+++ 265967 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.165749780E09 +++$+++ Yes they are fun pictures.  One thing that I often find disappointing about pictures, however, is that the sense of proportion one has in real life is often lost in pictures.  In the picture looking down from upstream of the waterfall, you might not think there was a 84 meter drop between the two levels of water.  You might get the impression that this is picture of a small stream.  The log in the picture helps to make the proportions clear, but still, there is something of the grandeur lost.  I'm sure you know what I mean.  Goodnight.  -- +++$+++ ::Yes they are fun pictures.  One thing that I often find disappointing about pictures, however, is that the sense of proportion one has in real life is often lost in pictures.  In the picture looking down from upstream of the waterfall, you might not think there was a 84 meter drop between the two levels of water.  You might get the impression that this is picture of a small stream.  The log in the picture helps to make the proportions clear, but still, there is something of the grandeur lost.  I'm sure you know what I mean.  Goodnight.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 03:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

3823 +++$+++ Michiluzzu Scalisi +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3823 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-21 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.248181440E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Michiluzzu Scalisi|Michiluzzu Scalisi]] ([[User talk:Michiluzzu Scalisi|talk]]) 06:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
3824 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3823 +++$+++ 3823 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.248413520E09 +++$+++ I am sorry for not replying sooner. One reason I put off replying is that you may know more than I do about js and css. But one thing I know that might help is that you can create a private override for monobook at [[User:Michiluzzu Scalisi\/monobook.js]] and [[User:Michiluzzu Scalisi\/monobook.css]]; I believe it also overrides common.css, etc. In case you are not aware, the jpg refers to [[:Commons:File:BGblue1.jpg]]. \u2014 +++$+++ :I am sorry for not replying sooner. One reason I put off replying is that you may know more than I do about js and css. But one thing I know that might help is that you can create a private override for monobook at [[User:Michiluzzu Scalisi/monobook.js]] and [[User:Michiluzzu Scalisi/monobook.css]]; I believe it also overrides common.css, etc. In case you are not aware, the jpg refers to [[:Commons:File:BGblue1.jpg]]. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 22:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
3825 +++$+++ Michiluzzu Scalisi +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3823 +++$+++ 3824 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.248530160E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:Michiluzzu Scalisi|Michiluzzu Scalisi]] ([[User talk:Michiluzzu Scalisi|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
3826 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3823 +++$+++ 3825 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.248530640E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)]] might be a good place. \u2014 +++$+++ :::[[Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)]] might be a good place. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 07:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

528112 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-08 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.189298160E09 +++$+++ Please explain your reason for speedily deletion. All three are discussed extensively in [[Symphony No. 3 (G\xf3recki)]]. Are FU files now explicitly disallowed. This is the second [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:%5Edemon&diff=154707885&oldid=154707479 request].  +++$+++ Please explain your reason for speedily deletion. All three are discussed extensively in [[Symphony No. 3 (Górecki)]]. Are FU files now explicitly disallowed. This is the second [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:%5Edemon&diff=154707885&oldid=154707479 request]. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] 17:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
528113 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528112 +++$+++ 528112 +++$+++ 2007-09-08 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.189298640E09 +++$+++ To explain: I want to try for the main page with this article, and I think it would be incomplete with out samples.  +++$+++ :To explain: I want to try for the main page with this article, and I think it would be incomplete with out samples. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] 17:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

474882 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 474882 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-25 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.303785360E09 +++$+++ I was going by [[WP:ELNEVER]]: \"editors are restricted from linking to the following, '''without exception''': Material that violates the copyrights of others... ''This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates copyright''\". Then there's [[WP:YOUTUBE]]: \"There is no blanket ban on linking to YouTube or other user-submitted video sites, as long as the links abide by the guidelines on this page.\" What do you think? -  +++$+++ I was going by [[WP:ELNEVER]]: "editors are restricted from linking to the following, '''without exception''': Material that violates the copyrights of others... ''This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates copyright''". Then there's [[WP:YOUTUBE]]: "There is no blanket ban on linking to YouTube or other user-submitted video sites, as long as the links abide by the guidelines on this page." What do you think? - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 19:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
474883 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 474882 +++$+++ 474882 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.303787460E09 +++$+++ I think the distinction there is between users uploading videos made by others (whose copyright they are violating - this is typically people uploading sporting and music video clips from TV recordings) and people uploading videos they made themselves (e.g. while on holiday or with their own camcorder). You have to judge the specific cases depending on the information available. What did you find when looking at the links in question?  +++$+++ :I think the distinction there is between users uploading videos made by others (whose copyright they are violating - this is typically people uploading sporting and music video clips from TV recordings) and people uploading videos they made themselves (e.g. while on holiday or with their own camcorder). You have to judge the specific cases depending on the information available. What did you find when looking at the links in question? [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth#top|talk]]) 20:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
474884 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 474882 +++$+++ 474883 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.303802040E09 +++$+++ Was [http:\/\/www.dailymotion.com\/robert-houdin#videoId=x1pxxy this guy] violating copyright when he created [http:\/\/www.dailymotion.com\/video\/x1pl7d_dragons-maison-de-la-magie-blois_creation this]? Was [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/hasheemweb this guy] violating copyright when he created [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=VUk6M0bozy8&feature=player_embedded this]? I don't know, but we should be sure the answer is \"no\" before restoring them. If you think not, then by all means, go ahead and reinsert the links. -  +++$+++ ::Was [http://www.dailymotion.com/robert-houdin#videoId=x1pxxy this guy] violating copyright when he created [http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1pl7d_dragons-maison-de-la-magie-blois_creation this]? Was [http://www.youtube.com/user/hasheemweb this guy] violating copyright when he created [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUk6M0bozy8&feature=player_embedded this]? I don't know, but we should be sure the answer is "no" before restoring them. If you think not, then by all means, go ahead and reinsert the links. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 00:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

3827 +++$+++ Phantomsteve +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3827 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-23 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.248410700E09 +++$+++ Regards, ''' +++$+++ Regards, '''[[User:Phantomsteve|<font color="#307D7E">Phantom</font><font color="#55CAFA">Steve</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Phantomsteve|<font color="#307D7E">Contact Me</font>]], [[Special:Contributions/Phantomsteve|<font color="#5599FA">My Contribs</font>]]) 21:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
3828 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3827 +++$+++ 3827 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.248414660E09 +++$+++ Yes, I was basically aware of your answers: I posted my questions more to hook Palengkero's interest than for information. I think you are right that he is male: A couple of reasons for thinking so is that he is stubborn (like you and me) and that \"Palengekero\" is probably a Spanish derivative meaning person from the palengke with a masculine ending. \u2014 +++$+++ :Yes, I was basically aware of your answers: I posted my questions more to hook Palengkero's interest than for information. I think you are right that he is male: A couple of reasons for thinking so is that he is stubborn (like you and me) and that "Palengekero" is probably a Spanish derivative meaning person from the palengke with a masculine ending. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 22:51, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
3829 +++$+++ Phantomsteve +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3827 +++$+++ 3828 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.248533040E09 +++$+++ Next week, I'll probably do some work on the article - especially the history. I'll read the info from the source, and then summarise\/rewrite it. I'll also try to find sources for the information away from the Tripod pages. ''' +++$+++ :: Next week, I'll probably do some work on the article - especially the history. I'll read the info from the source, and then summarise/rewrite it. I'll also try to find sources for the information away from the Tripod pages. '''[[User:Phantomsteve|<font color="#307D7E">Phantom</font><font color="#55CAFA">Steve</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Phantomsteve|<font color="#307D7E">Contact Me</font>]], [[Special:Contributions/Phantomsteve|<font color="#5599FA">My Contribs</font>]]) 07:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

3830 +++$+++ Zul32 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3830 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-25 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.248588000E09 +++$+++ TEB728 - I disagree with your decision to mark my license plate image File:Mississippi08plate.jpg for deletion because of \"copyright\" violation. I owned that license plate, and I scanned and uploaded the picture of that plate myself on my own PC. I have contributed several images of license plates in the past, and don't understand why you are singling out this one for deletion? Your reason for this deletion warrants further justification. +++$+++ TEB728 - I disagree with your decision to mark my license plate image File:Mississippi08plate.jpg for deletion because of "copyright" violation. I owned that license plate, and I scanned and uploaded the picture of that plate myself on my own PC. I have contributed several images of license plates in the past, and don't understand why you are singling out this one for deletion? Your reason for this deletion warrants further justification.[[User:Zul32|Zul32]] ([[User talk:Zul32|talk]]) 23:00, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
3831 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3830 +++$+++ 3830 +++$+++ 2009-07-26 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.248593400E09 +++$+++ By the way, since you have uploaded several other plates: Those which are just text should be tagged with [[Commons:Template:PD-text]]. Those which (like the Mississippi plate) include creative graphics should be moved to Wikipedia with a non-free tag. \u2014 +++$+++ :By the way, since you have uploaded several other plates: Those which are just text should be tagged with [[Commons:Template:PD-text]]. Those which (like the Mississippi plate) include creative graphics should be moved to Wikipedia with a non-free tag. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 00:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

528119 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528119 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-11 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.189548720E09 +++$+++ \"Phedon Papamichael is set to direct \"From Within,\" an independently financed thriller that will star Thomas Dekker (\"Heroes\"), Elizabeth Rice, Adam Goldberg and Jake Weber.\"  Please do not remove verifiable information.  IMDb is user-submitted and fails to be a reliable source -- it has even listed Aunt May as Carnage for Spider-Man 3 at one point.  Unfortunately, a complaint from someone is not a verifiable source.  If you have a verifiable citation that says he is not involved with the film, feel free to provide it. \u2014 +++$+++ "Phedon Papamichael is set to direct "From Within," an independently financed thriller that will star Thomas Dekker ("Heroes"), Elizabeth Rice, Adam Goldberg and Jake Weber."  Please do not remove verifiable information.  IMDb is user-submitted and fails to be a reliable source -- it has even listed Aunt May as Carnage for Spider-Man 3 at one point.  Unfortunately, a complaint from someone is not a verifiable source.  If you have a verifiable citation that says he is not involved with the film, feel free to provide it. —[[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 15:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
528120 +++$+++ Persian Poet Gal +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528119 +++$+++ 528119 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.189577280E09 +++$+++ I have blocked the user reposting the copyright violation for 24 hours and deleted the page. +++$+++ :I have blocked the user reposting the copyright violation for 24 hours and deleted the page.[[User:Persian Poet Gal|<font face="comic sans ms"><font color="purple"><i><b>¤~Persian Poet Gal</b></i></font></font>]] <font color="purple">[[User talk:Persian Poet Gal|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]</font> 23:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

3832 +++$+++ Hstisgod +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-28 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.248793920E09 +++$+++ I wasn't able to find it again, but thank you for answering my question so quickly.  What did I remove?  I still have to locate the issue, though I see your answer.  Thanks for your assistance either way.   +++$+++ I wasn't able to find it again, but thank you for answering my question so quickly.  What did I remove?  I still have to locate the issue, though I see your answer.  Thanks for your assistance either way.  [[User:Hstisgod|Hstisgod]] ([[User talk:Hstisgod|talk]]) 08:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
3833 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3832 +++$+++ 3832 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 08:37:00 +++$+++ 1.248795420E09 +++$+++ On [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Small_Steps,_Heavy_Hooves&diff=next&oldid=304636399 this edit] you removed the }} which closes the infobox template. \u2014 +++$+++ :On [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Small_Steps,_Heavy_Hooves&diff=next&oldid=304636399 this edit] you removed the }} which closes the infobox template. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 08:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

541328 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-23 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.237856040E09 +++$+++ Thanks! &ndash; +++$+++ Thanks! &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 17:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
541329 +++$+++ GlassCobra +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541328 +++$+++ 541328 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.237866480E09 +++$+++ I wonder if you were going to reply to me as well? If not, no biggie, was just curious.  +++$+++ :I wonder if you were going to reply to me as well? If not, no biggie, was just curious. [[User:GlassCobra|<font color="002bb8">Glass</font>]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|<font color="002bb8">Cobra</font>]]''' 20:48, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

528123 +++$+++ Tkynerd +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528123 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.189731900E09 +++$+++ Also, I don't really understand the last part of your comment. If there is a consensus for a move, no mediation is needed, right? :-) -- +++$+++ Also, I don't really understand the last part of your comment. If there is a consensus for a move, no mediation is needed, right? :-) --[[User:Tkynerd|Tkynerd]] 18:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
528124 +++$+++ Tkynerd +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528123 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.189834740E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for clarifying that. Best, -- +++$+++ ::OK, thanks for clarifying that. Best, --[[User:Tkynerd|Tkynerd]] 22:39, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

3837 +++$+++ Sarah.gkhia +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-03 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.249343100E09 +++$+++ thanks you soo much once again, really appreciate ur nice reply-- +++$+++ thanks you soo much once again, really appreciate ur nice reply--[[User:Sarah.gkhia|Sarah.gkhia]] ([[User talk:Sarah.gkhia|talk]]) 16:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
3838 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3837 +++$+++ 3837 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.249439880E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]]. Any picture of him would have to be licensed under a [[free license]] like {{tl|cc-by}} or {{tl|cc-by-sa}}, and that license should be indicated on the upload along with information on the source. If the uploader is not the photographer, or if the photo looks like it might have been taken by a professional photographer, or if it is something that is posted on his web site, they should send an email as described at [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]]. \u2014 +++$+++ :See [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]]. Any picture of him would have to be licensed under a [[free license]] like {{tl|cc-by}} or {{tl|cc-by-sa}}, and that license should be indicated on the upload along with information on the source. If the uploader is not the photographer, or if the photo looks like it might have been taken by a professional photographer, or if it is something that is posted on his web site, they should send an email as described at [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]]. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 19:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

3839 +++$+++ WatchingWhales +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-12 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.250124660E09 +++$+++ I'm confused about how you are guiding this user's uploads.  First, rationales like those found in [[:File:Salk Institute opens.jpg]] hardly pass muster, particularly since that photo isn't even used on the [[Salk Institute]] article.  The rationales this editor is using would make almost ''every'' photo ever taken eligible for use on this site.  Second, no sources are given for any of Wikiwatcher's uploads of work that they clearly did not take themselves.  For instance, [[:File:Schulberg-portrait.jpg]] is now being claimed in the public domain because it's copyright has supposedly expired.  How do we know this, or is this just an assumption that is being made on the part of the editor since the photo is pre-1977?  Where did they find the photo and how do we know it was published without a copyright notice?  When artists create work, it is our responsibility to ensure that we don't simply decide they no longer own it so that we can have their photos on our articles, without some indication that we may do so.  Without verifiability that the copyright on these images is not enforceable, we are essentially just taking the work of others and deciding to re-license it.  No only could this cause legal issues, it is also an ethical problem.  If I'm wrong, I'd appreciate you pointing out how that is so.  -- +++$+++ I'm confused about how you are guiding this user's uploads.  First, rationales like those found in [[:File:Salk Institute opens.jpg]] hardly pass muster, particularly since that photo isn't even used on the [[Salk Institute]] article.  The rationales this editor is using would make almost ''every'' photo ever taken eligible for use on this site.  Second, no sources are given for any of Wikiwatcher's uploads of work that they clearly did not take themselves.  For instance, [[:File:Schulberg-portrait.jpg]] is now being claimed in the public domain because it's copyright has supposedly expired.  How do we know this, or is this just an assumption that is being made on the part of the editor since the photo is pre-1977?  Where did they find the photo and how do we know it was published without a copyright notice?  When artists create work, it is our responsibility to ensure that we don't simply decide they no longer own it so that we can have their photos on our articles, without some indication that we may do so.  Without verifiability that the copyright on these images is not enforceable, we are essentially just taking the work of others and deciding to re-license it.  No only could this cause legal issues, it is also an ethical problem.  If I'm wrong, I'd appreciate you pointing out how that is so.  --[[User:WatchingWhales|WatchingWhales]] ([[User talk:WatchingWhales|talk]]) 17:51, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
3840 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3839 +++$+++ 3839 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.250145540E09 +++$+++ I hope this helps. \u2014 +++$+++ :I hope this helps. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 23:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
3841 +++$+++ WatchingWhales +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3839 +++$+++ 3840 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.250199000E09 +++$+++ Yes, but the burden of proof that the images are ineligible for copyright falls on the uploader, not the person questioning its eligibility.  Otherwise, we could have thousand of images uploaded while someone sits back and says, \"Figure out which ones are PD\".  That it's \"plausible\" an image has lost its copyright isn't the standard we use - as long as the image fails to show the veracity of its claim that it's Public Domain, it should be deleted.  -- +++$+++ ::Yes, but the burden of proof that the images are ineligible for copyright falls on the uploader, not the person questioning its eligibility.  Otherwise, we could have thousand of images uploaded while someone sits back and says, "Figure out which ones are PD".  That it's "plausible" an image has lost its copyright isn't the standard we use - as long as the image fails to show the veracity of its claim that it's Public Domain, it should be deleted.  --[[User:WatchingWhales|WatchingWhales]] ([[User talk:WatchingWhales|talk]]) 14:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
3842 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3839 +++$+++ 3841 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.250216820E09 +++$+++ Maybe you should take the issue back to [[WP:MCQ]]. PD issues are too complicated for me. \u2014 +++$+++ :::Maybe you should take the issue back to [[WP:MCQ]]. PD issues are too complicated for me. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 19:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

524928 +++$+++ Meegs +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-31 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.136089440E09 +++$+++ About captions: [[User_talk:Meegs#Infobox]] '''''\xd7''''' +++$+++ About captions: [[User_talk:Meegs#Infobox]] '''''×'''''[[User:Meegs|Meegs]] 20:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
524929 +++$+++ Meegs +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524928 +++$+++ 524928 +++$+++ 2005-12-31 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.136091180E09 +++$+++ Also check out [[User_talk:Zzyzx11#NFL_logo]] and [[User_talk:Meegs#NFL_logo]] for a reason not to include your tiny logo in the box. '''''\xd7''''' +++$+++ :Also check out [[User_talk:Zzyzx11#NFL_logo]] and [[User_talk:Meegs#NFL_logo]] for a reason not to include your tiny logo in the box. '''''×'''''[[User:Meegs|Meegs]] 20:53, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

265986 +++$+++ NinaEliza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265986 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.165920000E09 +++$+++ That's good to hear. Ride this \"peaceful day\" like a carousel pony - it might just get you to the next and the next and the next. :)  +++$+++ That's good to hear. Ride this "peaceful day" like a carousel pony - it might just get you to the next and the next and the next. :) [[User:NinaEliza|NinaEliza]] 02:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
265987 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265986 +++$+++ 265986 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.165921680E09 +++$+++ A contribution to your peace. [[Image:Lac st jean.JPG|thumb]] -- +++$+++ :A contribution to your peace. [[Image:Lac st jean.JPG|thumb]] --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 03:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

3843 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3843 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-14 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.250278740E09 +++$+++ It was based on the comments [[User_talk:Wikiwatcher1\/Archive1#File:Berlin-Jolson27.JPG|here]]. Do you have reason to believe otherwise?  +++$+++ It was based on the comments [[User_talk:Wikiwatcher1/Archive1#File:Berlin-Jolson27.JPG|here]]. Do you have reason to believe otherwise? [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 12:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
3844 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3843 +++$+++ 3843 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.250312460E09 +++$+++ I'm not an expert on the issue, but I am happy to trust him. I consulted another editor I trust to know about the issue ({{ul|MBisanz}}), and he seemed to agree with trusting Wikiwatcher1.  +++$+++ :I'm not an expert on the issue, but I am happy to trust him. I consulted another editor I trust to know about the issue ({{ul|MBisanz}}), and he seemed to agree with trusting Wikiwatcher1. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 22:01, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
3845 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3843 +++$+++ 3844 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.250313540E09 +++$+++ I agree. He strikes me as honest, and in your linked discussion above he seems to understand PD. \u2014 +++$+++ ::I agree. He strikes me as honest, and in your linked discussion above he seems to understand PD. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 22:19, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

3846 +++$+++ Verbal +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-18 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.250633700E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from abusing [[Wikipedia:Template messages\/User talk namespace|warning or blocking templates]]{{#if:User talk:Skeptical Dude|, as you did to [[:User talk:Skeptical Dude]]}}. Doing so is a violation of [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. Please use the [[User talk:Sandbox for user warnings|user warnings sandbox]] for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction page]] to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:Uw-tempabuse2 --> ''Please see [[WP:NOTVAND]]. Whatever the merits of your argument otherwise, incorrectly accusing others of vandalism, and missing out several levels of warning, severly weakens your credibility. Please strike your accusation and engage in discussion on the article talk page.'' <span style=\"font-family:Papyrus\"> +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from abusing [[Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace|warning or blocking templates]]{{#if:User talk:Skeptical Dude|, as you did to [[:User talk:Skeptical Dude]]}}. Doing so is a violation of [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. Please use the [[User talk:Sandbox for user warnings|user warnings sandbox]] for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction page]] to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:Uw-tempabuse2 --> ''Please see [[WP:NOTVAND]]. Whatever the merits of your argument otherwise, incorrectly accusing others of vandalism, and missing out several levels of warning, severly weakens your credibility. Please strike your accusation and engage in discussion on the article talk page.'' <span style="font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Verbal|<b style="color:#C72">Verbal</b>]] <small>[[User talk:Verbal#top|<span style="color:Gray;">chat</span>]]</small></span> 15:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
3847 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3846 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.250659560E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you misunderstood my post beginning, \u201cJust in case you actually are as ignorant as you portray yourself here, let me explain.\u201d I admit that was very badly expressed. Although it seems to imply that I thought there was an outside chance the troll was merely ignorant, what I meant was, \u201cYou should realize that your vandalism makes you seem so stupid that you don\u2019t understand\u2026\u201d I was trying to shame him into stopping the vandalism. If you like I will make that change. \u2014 +++$+++ :*Perhaps you misunderstood my post beginning, “Just in case you actually are as ignorant as you portray yourself here, let me explain.” I admit that was very badly expressed. Although it seems to imply that I thought there was an outside chance the troll was merely ignorant, what I meant was, “You should realize that your vandalism makes you seem so stupid that you don’t understand…” I was trying to shame him into stopping the vandalism. If you like I will make that change. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 22:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
3848 +++$+++ Verbal +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3846 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.250693400E09 +++$+++ I understand perfectly, and here is my advice to you: Stop making incorrect accusations of vandalism. You also need to have a look at [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:AGF]] regarding your \"troll\" accusations. <span style=\"font-family:Papyrus\"> +++$+++ :: I understand perfectly, and here is my advice to you: Stop making incorrect accusations of vandalism. You also need to have a look at [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:AGF]] regarding your "troll" accusations. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Verbal|<b style="color:#C72">Verbal</b>]] <small>[[User talk:Verbal#top|<span style="color:Gray;">chat</span>]]</small></span> 07:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

265992 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.165978380E09 +++$+++ I am ashamed to say this but in my large collecton of Hoysala architectural photographs (over 200), I dont have a single coin. But I will look for other unique images. Also, look out for American-->English spelling issues. thanks. +++$+++ I am ashamed to say this but in my large collecton of Hoysala architectural photographs (over 200), I dont have a single coin. But I will look for other unique images. Also, look out for American-->English spelling issues. thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
265993 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265992 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.165979220E09 +++$+++ First Family inscription means first family writing on Stone describing their lineage, family details, kinship, grants of land , victory\/defeat at war etc which are generally considered official \"records\" (''Shila Shasana'').Stone inscriptions (found in most ancient temples in India built before 1600 CE). They were also written commonly on copper plates (''tamara shasana'') but more likely private records like loans. Copper plates are almost like note books except they are a bunch of copper plates tied together with a string. See [[Tamil Literature]]. The top right image is what copper plates look like. +++$+++ ::First Family inscription means first family writing on Stone describing their lineage, family details, kinship, grants of land , victory/defeat at war etc which are generally considered official "records" (''Shila Shasana'').Stone inscriptions (found in most ancient temples in India built before 1600 CE). They were also written commonly on copper plates (''tamara shasana'') but more likely private records like loans. Copper plates are almost like note books except they are a bunch of copper plates tied together with a string. See [[Tamil Literature]]. The top right image is what copper plates look like.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

3849 +++$+++ Shanilea +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-01 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.251854040E09 +++$+++ You have marked the PNNL article as sounding like an advertisement.  However, the article is a factual statement of the Laboratory's capabilities, mission, purpose, and charter from the U.S. Department of Energy. Your edits to the article have significantly and negatively impacted this article.  We are not advertising for business.  We are, as stated in the article, part of the U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory system.  It is our mission and capabilities that set us apart from the other laboratories, thus this information is crucial to the article.  +++$+++ You have marked the PNNL article as sounding like an advertisement.  However, the article is a factual statement of the Laboratory's capabilities, mission, purpose, and charter from the U.S. Department of Energy. Your edits to the article have significantly and negatively impacted this article.  We are not advertising for business.  We are, as stated in the article, part of the U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory system.  It is our mission and capabilities that set us apart from the other laboratories, thus this information is crucial to the article. [[User:Shanilea|Shanilea]] ([[User talk:Shanilea|talk]]) 18:14, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
3850 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3849 +++$+++ 3849 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.251863820E09 +++$+++ I notice that you speak of PNNL as \u201cwe,\u201d and you speak of \u201cour mission.\u201d This suggests to me that you work for PNNL or Battelle (perhaps in the public relations department?). If so, you need to read Wikipedia\u2019s guideline on [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. Many people think that people should not edit article where they have conflict of interest at all. I would not go that far: surely you are welcome to correct factual errors (like budget and staff). But you need to be very careful of editing to make PNNL look good (or avoid making it look bad). \u2014 +++$+++ :I notice that you speak of PNNL as “we,” and you speak of “our mission.” This suggests to me that you work for PNNL or Battelle (perhaps in the public relations department?). If so, you need to read Wikipedia’s guideline on [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. Many people think that people should not edit article where they have conflict of interest at all. I would not go that far: surely you are welcome to correct factual errors (like budget and staff). But you need to be very careful of editing to make PNNL look good (or avoid making it look bad). —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 20:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

528138 +++$+++ Sox23 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528138 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-21 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.190444340E09 +++$+++ Hi demon. Can you please delete [Image:Midway Airport Runway 4R (Brett B. Despain).jpg]. The author had requested it be deleted as he is going to sell it. I saw you deleted it yesterday, but I re-uploaded it because I thought it was deleted for a different reason. I checked my email today and saw he wrote me telling me he wanted it off so when you have a chance can you delete the image for me. Thanks alot! <strong> +++$+++ Hi demon. Can you please delete [Image:Midway Airport Runway 4R (Brett B. Despain).jpg]. The author had requested it be deleted as he is going to sell it. I saw you deleted it yesterday, but I re-uploaded it because I thought it was deleted for a different reason. I checked my email today and saw he wrote me telling me he wanted it off so when you have a chance can you delete the image for me. Thanks alot! <strong>[[User:Sox23|Sox]]<font color="blue">[[User_talk:Sox23|23]]</font></strong> 23:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
528139 +++$+++ FCYTravis +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528138 +++$+++ 528138 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.190446260E09 +++$+++ If the image is GFDLed, then we have no reason to delete it. Did the user tell you when you uploaded it that he was releasing it under the GFDL or CC-by-SA? If so, then he can't take that back.  +++$+++ :If the image is GFDLed, then we have no reason to delete it. Did the user tell you when you uploaded it that he was releasing it under the GFDL or CC-by-SA? If so, then he can't take that back. [[User:FCYTravis|FCYTravis]] 00:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
528140 +++$+++ Sox23 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528138 +++$+++ 528139 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.190446800E09 +++$+++ It's the GNU liscense and has already been deleted by Demon before. <strong> +++$+++ ::It's the GNU liscense and has already been deleted by Demon before. <strong>[[User:Sox23|Sox]]<font color="blue">[[User_talk:Sox23|23]]</font></strong> 00:40, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
528141 +++$+++ FCYTravis +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528138 +++$+++ 528140 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.190447280E09 +++$+++ That license is, as far as I understand, not revocable. He can sell it, but he also cannot prevent free copying and redistribution of the existing, low-res photo, if he did release the photo under the GFDL already.  +++$+++ :::That license is, as far as I understand, not revocable. He can sell it, but he also cannot prevent free copying and redistribution of the existing, low-res photo, if he did release the photo under the GFDL already. [[User:FCYTravis|FCYTravis]] 00:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
528142 +++$+++ Sox23 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528138 +++$+++ 528141 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.190495340E09 +++$+++ Just so you guys know, I have already found a replacement picture for the article, so it really doesn't matter if this one gets deleted...<strong> +++$+++ ::::Just so you guys know, I have already found a replacement picture for the article, so it really doesn't matter if this one gets deleted...<strong>[[User:Sox23|Sox]]<font color="blue">[[User_talk:Sox23|23]]</font></strong> 14:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

265995 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.165993740E09 +++$+++ But I have been reducing my talk page.  See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABostonMA&diff=93917190&oldid=93825574].  I guess that when you are as far behind as I am, it isn't that noticable :-(.  I think the word \"opine\" is a bit unusual, but would certainly be understood.  -- +++$+++ But I have been reducing my talk page.  See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABostonMA&diff=93917190&oldid=93825574].  I guess that when you are as far behind as I am, it isn't that noticable :-(.  I think the word "opine" is a bit unusual, but would certainly be understood.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
265996 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265995 +++$+++ 265995 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.165994880E09 +++$+++ OK, sorting my messages probably has no significant value, and is probably just a waste of my time, so I did a mass archive.  :-) -- +++$+++ :OK, sorting my messages probably has no significant value, and is probably just a waste of my time, so I did a mass archive.  :-) --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

265997 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.165983420E09 +++$+++ If there is something remarkable about it -- something that stands out. If there were a place where you dicuss scientifc, agricultural, engineering advances and such it would fit in. Is is mentioned in the literature article? The problem is, for a person like me, there are so many names. That would be my reservation over adding another. On the other hand, it seems there is so much concentration on the arts in this survey article, and I secretly believe the Hoysalas had to be more accomplised in other areas than they are given credit. Else, how did these \"hill peoples\" pull this whole thing off, conquer lands etc. They could not have had the luxury of building fabulous temples if they did not have a strong grip on other areas. So, bottom line is, I don't know. You could try it and see if you can work it in someplace meaningful. (Experimentation is O.K.!)  Sincerely,   +++$+++ If there is something remarkable about it -- something that stands out. If there were a place where you dicuss scientifc, agricultural, engineering advances and such it would fit in. Is is mentioned in the literature article? The problem is, for a person like me, there are so many names. That would be my reservation over adding another. On the other hand, it seems there is so much concentration on the arts in this survey article, and I secretly believe the Hoysalas had to be more accomplised in other areas than they are given credit. Else, how did these "hill peoples" pull this whole thing off, conquer lands etc. They could not have had the luxury of building fabulous temples if they did not have a strong grip on other areas. So, bottom line is, I don't know. You could try it and see if you can work it in someplace meaningful. (Experimentation is O.K.!)  Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 20:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
265998 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265997 +++$+++ 265997 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.165983420E09 +++$+++ P.S. Did the Hoysalas originate or promote the Kannanda language or was it coincidental that it flourished during their time? Was it related in some way to social factors, like the empowerment of the  \"locals\"? (But as the FA editors stuck in, the caste systme remained firmly in place.) Sincerely,  +++$+++ :P.S. Did the Hoysalas originate or promote the Kannanda language or was it coincidental that it flourished during their time? Was it related in some way to social factors, like the empowerment of the  "locals"? (But as the FA editors stuck in, the caste systme remained firmly in place.) Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 20:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

3855 +++$+++ BillTunell +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-28 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.254201060E09 +++$+++ TEB: I've noticed you've reverted use of the UCLA logo in {{tl|User ucla}}.  I'm not sure how much you're aware of the ongoing wiki adminsitrator review of the userbox topic, but {{tl|PD-textlogo}} images have been approved for use in userboxes as a result of discussions [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Zscout370#University_Logos.2Fuserboxes here] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/IncidentArchive564#BillTunell_and_userboxes here].  The basic rationale is that trademarked by uncopyrightable logos (text\/font combinations without pictoral elements) are public domain and need no rights rationale for multiple-page use.  I can explain more if you're interested.  I've reverted back the UCLA userbox based on this.  Let me know if you have a more specific objection.  +++$+++ TEB: I've noticed you've reverted use of the UCLA logo in {{tl|User ucla}}.  I'm not sure how much you're aware of the ongoing wiki adminsitrator review of the userbox topic, but {{tl|PD-textlogo}} images have been approved for use in userboxes as a result of discussions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Zscout370#University_Logos.2Fuserboxes here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive564#BillTunell_and_userboxes here].  The basic rationale is that trademarked by uncopyrightable logos (text/font combinations without pictoral elements) are public domain and need no rights rationale for multiple-page use.  I can explain more if you're interested.  I've reverted back the UCLA userbox based on this.  Let me know if you have a more specific objection. [[User:BillTunell|BillTunell]] ([[User talk:BillTunell|talk]]) 22:11, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
3856 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3855 +++$+++ 3855 +++$+++ 2009-09-29 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.254214560E09 +++$+++ The UCLA logo for general purposes is [[:File:UCLA Logo.svg]]. I will replace the Bruins logo with that in the userbox; not only is that clearly a textlogo; the use would not be a trademark violation. \u2014 +++$+++ :The UCLA logo for general purposes is [[:File:UCLA Logo.svg]]. I will replace the Bruins logo with that in the userbox; not only is that clearly a textlogo; the use would not be a trademark violation. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 01:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
3857 +++$+++ BillTunell +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3855 +++$+++ 3856 +++$+++ 2009-09-29 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.254257760E09 +++$+++ I won't change the userbox, since there is a lack of consensus about whether the UCLA-script logo is copyrightable.  But I would dispute that assumption, and I would also point out that a trademark claim does not create a limitation on public-domain use.  People are allowed to directly use (even sell) others' marks as long as they are not copyrights (and they do not misattribute a source of goods or services).  This occurs all the time with things such as college\/university marks, the Coca-Cola logo, etc..  So the fact that a univserity logo is trademarked does not limit its dissemination in the public domain.  Anyway, I'll leave the UCLA userbox alone.   +++$+++ ::I won't change the userbox, since there is a lack of consensus about whether the UCLA-script logo is copyrightable.  But I would dispute that assumption, and I would also point out that a trademark claim does not create a limitation on public-domain use.  People are allowed to directly use (even sell) others' marks as long as they are not copyrights (and they do not misattribute a source of goods or services).  This occurs all the time with things such as college/university marks, the Coca-Cola logo, etc..  So the fact that a univserity logo is trademarked does not limit its dissemination in the public domain.  Anyway, I'll leave the UCLA userbox alone.  [[User:BillTunell|BillTunell]] ([[User talk:BillTunell|talk]]) 13:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
3858 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3855 +++$+++ 3857 +++$+++ 2009-09-30 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.254366120E09 +++$+++ Bill, this isn't a slam on you, but you have a few facts wrong here. The fact that the image is trademarked ''does'' put limits on its use. It cannot be used in such a manner that would imply sponsorship or endorsement. It cannot be used for initial profit (i.e. commercial sale, but selling your old \"UCLA\" sweatshirt at a garage sale is appropriate). The same kind of restrictions apply to patents, which are, by definition, PD; you cannot make that patented item and sell it, but you can create it and use it for yourself. Even the Coca-Cola image, which is PD, is still indefinitely protected by trademark. <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ :::Bill, this isn't a slam on you, but you have a few facts wrong here. The fact that the image is trademarked ''does'' put limits on its use. It cannot be used in such a manner that would imply sponsorship or endorsement. It cannot be used for initial profit (i.e. commercial sale, but selling your old "UCLA" sweatshirt at a garage sale is appropriate). The same kind of restrictions apply to patents, which are, by definition, PD; you cannot make that patented item and sell it, but you can create it and use it for yourself. Even the Coca-Cola image, which is PD, is still indefinitely protected by trademark. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 20:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
3859 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3855 +++$+++ 3858 +++$+++ 2009-10-01 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.254389400E09 +++$+++ Similarly, if Wikipedia allowed group accounts, and if a userbox said, \u201cThis group of users is a UCLA athletic team,\u201d the userbox might use the Bruins logo (if hypothetically the logo were PD). But in a userbox that says, \u201cThis user attends or attended UCLA\u201d it would be a trademark dilution, for UCLA reserves the Bruins logo for \u201cathletics, recreation, spirit groups, support groups and student groups.\u201d (See p 14 of [http:\/\/www.identity.ucla.edu\/graphicstandards\/UCLAStandardsManual0904.pdf this manual].) \u2014 +++$+++ ::::Similarly, if Wikipedia allowed group accounts, and if a userbox said, “This group of users is a UCLA athletic team,” the userbox might use the Bruins logo (if hypothetically the logo were PD). But in a userbox that says, “This user attends or attended UCLA” it would be a trademark dilution, for UCLA reserves the Bruins logo for “athletics, recreation, spirit groups, support groups and student groups.” (See p 14 of [http://www.identity.ucla.edu/graphicstandards/UCLAStandardsManual0904.pdf this manual].) —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 02:30, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
3860 +++$+++ BillTunell +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3855 +++$+++ 3859 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.255668720E09 +++$+++ I agree with most of the above except some of the commercial-related comments.  It is legal to direclty sell a non-copyrightable mark, provided that you do not misattribute the source.  People do this all the time in the context of college and univesity marks (''i.e.,'' print \"OU\" or \"ND\" hats and sell them without university permission).  Colleges don't like it, and have responded via the CLC to limit market power of such knock-off artists.  But it happens and is legal -- again, provided wee're talking about a non-copyrightable mark.   +++$+++ :::::I agree with most of the above except some of the commercial-related comments.  It is legal to direclty sell a non-copyrightable mark, provided that you do not misattribute the source.  People do this all the time in the context of college and univesity marks (''i.e.,'' print "OU" or "ND" hats and sell them without university permission).  Colleges don't like it, and have responded via the CLC to limit market power of such knock-off artists.  But it happens and is legal -- again, provided wee're talking about a non-copyrightable mark.  [[User:BillTunell|BillTunell]] ([[User talk:BillTunell|talk]]) 21:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

481240 +++$+++ Deiz +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-25 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.161834780E09 +++$+++ You left me a note about the fair-use eligibility of Image:Michaelcatonjonespromo.jpg. I'm not sure how easily this could be replaced, or how \"a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created\". I'm not an FU expert, but I was under the impression that promotional \/ publicity shots of people could be used under exactly these circumstances. He's not all that well known and probably doesn't live next door to a shutterbug wikipedian, so I think the image should be OK. No? If this is the bar for image deletion then 90% of the images on WP are going to have to go which kinda goes against the point of having FU in the first place. <b> +++$+++ You left me a note about the fair-use eligibility of Image:Michaelcatonjonespromo.jpg. I'm not sure how easily this could be replaced, or how "a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created". I'm not an FU expert, but I was under the impression that promotional / publicity shots of people could be used under exactly these circumstances. He's not all that well known and probably doesn't live next door to a shutterbug wikipedian, so I think the image should be OK. No? If this is the bar for image deletion then 90% of the images on WP are going to have to go which kinda goes against the point of having FU in the first place. <b>[[User:Deiz|<FONT STYLE="verdana" COLOR="#000000">Dei</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF3300">zio</FONT>]]</b> <small>[[User talk:Deiz|talk]]</small> 20:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
481241 +++$+++ Deiz +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481240 +++$+++ 481240 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.161837780E09 +++$+++ It's such a subjective rule to have to interpret, and no doubt leads to well intentioned image patrollers like yourself getting plenty of grief from well intentioned image uploaders. If the office commanded all <nowiki>{{promotional}}<\/nowiki> images were wikiana non grata, fair enough, if it's left to us 'pedians to decide than I'd be a lot happier if there was a clear, joined up policy rather than disagreement and the talk pages of good souls like yourself turning into the image complaints department. \"An image of a living person that merely shows what they look like\" sounds to me like the definition of \"photograph\", and speaking from the perspective of a [[WP:WPBIO]] member it's generally held to be desirable to have one in an article. I don't see \"An image of a city \/ flower \/ monkey that merely shows what it looks like\" in the guideline. You obviously know more about this than me, but like I say I'd be more comfortable if FU eligibility was crystallized in clear policy rather than slightly confused guidelines. Good luck with the patrolling, <b> +++$+++ :It's such a subjective rule to have to interpret, and no doubt leads to well intentioned image patrollers like yourself getting plenty of grief from well intentioned image uploaders. If the office commanded all <nowiki>{{promotional}}</nowiki> images were wikiana non grata, fair enough, if it's left to us 'pedians to decide than I'd be a lot happier if there was a clear, joined up policy rather than disagreement and the talk pages of good souls like yourself turning into the image complaints department. "An image of a living person that merely shows what they look like" sounds to me like the definition of "photograph", and speaking from the perspective of a [[WP:WPBIO]] member it's generally held to be desirable to have one in an article. I don't see "An image of a city / flower / monkey that merely shows what it looks like" in the guideline. You obviously know more about this than me, but like I say I'd be more comfortable if FU eligibility was crystallized in clear policy rather than slightly confused guidelines. Good luck with the patrolling, <b>[[User:Deiz|<FONT STYLE="verdana" COLOR="#000000">Dei</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF3300">zio</FONT>]]</b> <small>[[User talk:Deiz|talk]]</small> 21:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

528148 +++$+++ WikiDon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528148 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-25 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.190711160E09 +++$+++ You deleted my sandbox, [[User:WikiDon-Sandbox]], I might have named it wrong. Maybe it should have been [[User:WikiDon\/Sandbox]], please recover my text, and put it in a sandbox for me.  +++$+++ You deleted my sandbox, [[User:WikiDon-Sandbox]], I might have named it wrong. Maybe it should have been [[User:WikiDon/Sandbox]], please recover my text, and put it in a sandbox for me. [[User:WikiDon|WikiDon]] 02:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
528149 +++$+++ WikiDon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528148 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.190778900E09 +++$+++ Listen, that was a SANDBOX, lots of users have sandbox's. I did NOT, repeat NOT create the article, [[Kimberly Hunt]], someone else did. I was trying to make it a worth while article in MY SANDBOX. 1) You just come along and delete things without asking. 2) You delete things in a sandbox where a credible user is trying to CLEAN UP and FIX it. 3) You don't even look at the article itself. 4) You are RUDE, very rude in your deletions and answers to questions. 5) There was information in there, about her grandfather who is DEAD that I would like back. 6) Try asking sometimes. 7) Try being nice and comprehensive in answering questions. Why are you so rude? Can I have that info back please?  +++$+++ ::::::Listen, that was a SANDBOX, lots of users have sandbox's. I did NOT, repeat NOT create the article, [[Kimberly Hunt]], someone else did. I was trying to make it a worth while article in MY SANDBOX. 1) You just come along and delete things without asking. 2) You delete things in a sandbox where a credible user is trying to CLEAN UP and FIX it. 3) You don't even look at the article itself. 4) You are RUDE, very rude in your deletions and answers to questions. 5) There was information in there, about her grandfather who is DEAD that I would like back. 6) Try asking sometimes. 7) Try being nice and comprehensive in answering questions. Why are you so rude? Can I have that info back please? [[User:WikiDon|WikiDon]] 20:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
528150 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528148 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.190792520E09 +++$+++ ^demon, I understand that there are issues with [[WP:BLP]], and that there are cases for OTRS to handle, but [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:AGF]] still apply, and override any content issues. While the section on her grandfather is painfully off topic, I can't see any malicious intent with it, and I don't see why not to give him his own words back, assuming they never show up here again.  +++$+++ :::::^demon, I understand that there are issues with [[WP:BLP]], and that there are cases for OTRS to handle, but [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:AGF]] still apply, and override any content issues. While the section on her grandfather is painfully off topic, I can't see any malicious intent with it, and I don't see why not to give him his own words back, assuming they never show up here again. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 00:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
528151 +++$+++ WikiDon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528148 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.190856840E09 +++$+++ You are just messing with me. Please put the text in here: [[User talk:WikiDon\/sandbox]] Please?  +++$+++ ::You are just messing with me. Please put the text in here: [[User talk:WikiDon/sandbox]] Please? [[User:WikiDon|WikiDon]] 18:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

3862 +++$+++ Epeefleche +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3862 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-17 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.255847820E09 +++$+++ Thanks.-- +++$+++ Thanks.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 23:37, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
3863 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3862 +++$+++ 3862 +++$+++ 2009-10-18 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.255852800E09 +++$+++ 1. By \u201cnormal\u201d I meant only to contrast the local awards with other VMAs that I am aware of. I did not mean to suggest that the local awards were \u201cabnormal.\u201d Would you like to propose a substitute? \u201cOrdinary\u201d maybe? 2. You do acknowledge that most if not all other VMA winners get Moonmen, don\u2019t you? In our discussion on the article talk page Andresg770 emphasized they did, and you didn\u2019t object. Would you like to propose a substitute?\u2014something that says ordinary VMA winners receive Moonmen, but the local award winners did not. 3. I ''did'' provide links to mtv.com searches which show no 2009 hits for \"Best Breakout\" and no hits for \"MeTalkPretty\". Unfortunately the MediaWiki software garbled them. Thank you for pointing this out; I will get them to work. 4. According to OurStage, the co-sponsor was not MTV but rather their parent [[MTV Networks]]. I am not aware of any videos supplied by MTV. (Indeed another thing that distinguishes the local awards from ordinary VMAs is that they are not based on videos.) I am not aware of any coverage on MTV as opposed to MTV2 and MTV Tr3s. What I am aware of is that neither the MTV winners page nor any place else on mtv.com mentions the local awards. \u2014 +++$+++ :1. By “normal” I meant only to contrast the local awards with other VMAs that I am aware of. I did not mean to suggest that the local awards were “abnormal.” Would you like to propose a substitute? “Ordinary” maybe? 2. You do acknowledge that most if not all other VMA winners get Moonmen, don’t you? In our discussion on the article talk page Andresg770 emphasized they did, and you didn’t object. Would you like to propose a substitute?—something that says ordinary VMA winners receive Moonmen, but the local award winners did not. 3. I ''did'' provide links to mtv.com searches which show no 2009 hits for "Best Breakout" and no hits for "MeTalkPretty". Unfortunately the MediaWiki software garbled them. Thank you for pointing this out; I will get them to work. 4. According to OurStage, the co-sponsor was not MTV but rather their parent [[MTV Networks]]. I am not aware of any videos supplied by MTV. (Indeed another thing that distinguishes the local awards from ordinary VMAs is that they are not based on videos.) I am not aware of any coverage on MTV as opposed to MTV2 and MTV Tr3s. What I am aware of is that neither the MTV winners page nor any place else on mtv.com mentions the local awards. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 01:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

3864 +++$+++ Steve Smith +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3864 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-22 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.258909320E09 +++$+++ I've seen you around a lot at [[WP:MCQ]] and some at [[WP:HELP]].  You clearly know what you're doing, and a glance through your talk page archive shows that you have a record being calm, rational, and friendly to new users.  As far as I can tell, you've never either stood for adminship or declined to do so after being asked, so I'll become the first: any interest in being nominated?  +++$+++ I've seen you around a lot at [[WP:MCQ]] and some at [[WP:HELP]].  You clearly know what you're doing, and a glance through your talk page archive shows that you have a record being calm, rational, and friendly to new users.  As far as I can tell, you've never either stood for adminship or declined to do so after being asked, so I'll become the first: any interest in being nominated? [[User:Steve Smith|Steve Smith]] ([[User talk:Steve Smith|talk]]) 09:02, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
3865 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3864 +++$+++ 3864 +++$+++ 2009-11-25 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.259166600E09 +++$+++ I'm not ignoring you, but I have been unusually busy last few days. I am drafting a reply on my PC and hope to post it soon. \u2014 +++$+++ :I'm not ignoring you, but I have been unusually busy last few days. I am drafting a reply on my PC and hope to post it soon. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 08:30, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
3866 +++$+++ Steve Smith +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3864 +++$+++ 3865 +++$+++ 2009-12-16 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.260970140E09 +++$+++ Hate to be a pest, but how's that reply coming along?  No hurry from my end, just wanted to remind you that the offer stands, if you're interested.  +++$+++ ::Hate to be a pest, but how's that reply coming along?  No hurry from my end, just wanted to remind you that the offer stands, if you're interested. [[User:Steve Smith|Steve Smith]] ([[User talk:Steve Smith|talk]]) 05:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
3867 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3864 +++$+++ 3866 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.293781200E09 +++$+++ I'm still planning to reply. I've been on a l o n g wikibreak for the past year+ -- partly due to a flakey computer and partly due to other projects. \u2014 +++$+++ :::I'm still planning to reply. I've been on a l o n g wikibreak for the past year+ -- partly due to a flakey computer and partly due to other projects. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 23:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

266011 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-14 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.166138940E09 +++$+++ Thank you. +++$+++ Thank you.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
266012 +++$+++ CheNuevara +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266011 +++$+++ 266011 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.166175600E09 +++$+++ This comment confuses me a little bit. I have not accused you of anything, and I don't understand why I should be \"satisfied with myself at your expense\". Was this comment directed at someone else? If it was directed at me, please explain what it means. I am simply trying to gather all the facts relevant to the case I am mediating, and making no judgments about you or anyone else involved. I'm sorry if it ''seemed'' that I was passing judgment on you, but I can't imagine what I said that might have given you that impression. -  +++$+++ :This comment confuses me a little bit. I have not accused you of anything, and I don't understand why I should be "satisfied with myself at your expense". Was this comment directed at someone else? If it was directed at me, please explain what it means. I am simply trying to gather all the facts relevant to the case I am mediating, and making no judgments about you or anyone else involved. I'm sorry if it ''seemed'' that I was passing judgment on you, but I can't imagine what I said that might have given you that impression. - [[User:CheNuevara|<font color="f0b400">Che</font> <font color="004411">Nuevara</font>]] 01:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
266013 +++$+++ CheNuevara +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266011 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.166179980E09 +++$+++ Please accept my sincerest apologies for any apparent incivility or the like. I assure you that nothing in that vein was my intention. -  +++$+++ :::Please accept my sincerest apologies for any apparent incivility or the like. I assure you that nothing in that vein was my intention. - [[User:CheNuevara|<font color="f0b400">Che</font> <font color="004411">Nuevara</font>]] 02:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

3869 +++$+++ Foobarnix +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3869 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-09 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.294569120E09 +++$+++ I understand the legal strategy of what you advised; I just do not know how to do it. You can answer me here or on my user page as you prefer.  I hope I am not imposing on your time.  Respond only if you think it is possible to help this poor technically clueless editor.-- +++$+++ I understand the legal strategy of what you advised; I just do not know how to do it. You can answer me here or on my user page as you prefer.  I hope I am not imposing on your time.  Respond only if you think it is possible to help this poor technically clueless editor.--[[User:Foobarnix|Foobarnix]] ([[User talk:Foobarnix|talk]]) 02:32, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
3870 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3869 +++$+++ 3869 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.294583100E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Uploading images]] for more info. \u2014 +++$+++ :See [[Wikipedia:Uploading images]] for more info. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 06:25, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

266014 +++$+++ CheNuevara +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-15 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.166240520E09 +++$+++ I've offered you both good faith and sincere apologies. If you choose to accept neither, what can I do? -  +++$+++ I've offered you both good faith and sincere apologies. If you choose to accept neither, what can I do? - [[User:CheNuevara|<font color="f0b400">Che</font> <font color="004411">Nuevara</font>]] 19:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
266015 +++$+++ CheNuevara +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266014 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-16 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.166261220E09 +++$+++ Peace. -  +++$+++ ::Peace. - [[User:CheNuevara|<font color="f0b400">Che</font> <font color="004411">Nuevara</font>]] 01:27, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

3871 +++$+++ Foobarnix +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3871 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-10 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.294655040E09 +++$+++ I am determined to get to the bottom of this damned image uploading labyrinth.  I hope I have not taken up too much of your valuable time.  You have been so kind to help me along this far.  Sorry that I am somewhat technically dense.-- +++$+++ I am determined to get to the bottom of this damned image uploading labyrinth.  I hope I have not taken up too much of your valuable time.  You have been so kind to help me along this far.  Sorry that I am somewhat technically dense.--[[User:Foobarnix|Foobarnix]] ([[User talk:Foobarnix|talk]]) 02:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
3872 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3871 +++$+++ 3871 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.294678740E09 +++$+++ I don\u2019t mind spending time with you because you are earnestly learning how things work, which will make you an excellent contributor.  \u2014 +++$+++ :I don’t mind spending time with you because you are earnestly learning how things work, which will make you an excellent contributor.  —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 08:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

528160 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528160 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-25 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.190756580E09 +++$+++ Hi. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think links should not be removed from articles that have been speedied for copyvio. If anything, the copyvio may actually validate the link (it usually means that the subject is notable), and a redlink is not a real problem for this project.  +++$+++ Hi. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think links should not be removed from articles that have been speedied for copyvio. If anything, the copyvio may actually validate the link (it usually means that the subject is notable), and a redlink is not a real problem for this project. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] 14:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
528161 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528160 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.190758320E09 +++$+++ No problem. Thank you.  +++$+++ ::No problem. Thank you. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] 15:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

3873 +++$+++ Foobarnix +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-10 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.294674300E09 +++$+++ {Non-free use rationale | Description = | Source = | Article = For the Love of Movies | Portion = | Low resolution = | Purpose = to identify the subject of the article | Replaceability = | Other information = }}-- +++$+++ {Non-free use rationale | Description = | Source = | Article = For the Love of Movies | Portion = | Low resolution = | Purpose = to identify the subject of the article | Replaceability = | Other information = }}--[[User:Foobarnix|Foobarnix]] ([[User talk:Foobarnix|talk]]) 07:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
3874 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3873 +++$+++ 3873 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.294681380E09 +++$+++ {{tl|Film poster fur}} does all that better and much easier. Look how nicely it worked with the Avitar poster! \u2014 +++$+++ :{{tl|Film poster fur}} does all that better and much easier. Look how nicely it worked with the Avitar poster! —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 09:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

3875 +++$+++ Foobarnix +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-11 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.294750500E09 +++$+++ As always, thank you so much for your help-- +++$+++ As always, thank you so much for your help--[[User:Foobarnix|Foobarnix]] ([[User talk:Foobarnix|talk]]) 04:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
3876 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3875 +++$+++ 3875 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.294775520E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ :—[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 11:52, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

266021 +++$+++ NinaEliza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-16 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.166322000E09 +++$+++ I love this star so much. It's actually cribbed from a [[Bollywood]] award. I thought you would like it, so here it is. How are you doing? <span class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ I love this star so much. It's actually cribbed from a [[Bollywood]] award. I thought you would like it, so here it is. How are you doing? <span class="plainlinks">[[User:NinaEliza|NinaEliza]]&nbsp;([[User talk:NinaEliza|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/NinaEliza|contribs]] <small>•</small> [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username={{urlencode:NinaEliza}}&site=en.wikipedia.org <span style="color:#002bb8">count</span>] <small>•</small> [{{SERVER}}/wiki/Special:Log?user={{urlencode:NinaEliza}} <span style="color:#002bb8">logs</span>] <small>•</small> [[Special:Emailuser/NinaEliza|email]]</span>) 18:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
266022 +++$+++ NinaEliza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266021 +++$+++ 266021 +++$+++ 2006-12-16 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.166323140E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry to hear that. You might consider doing something else on Wikipedia to take your mind off the crap-storm. There's a great discussion going on at the [[WT:CCD|talk page]] of [[W:CCD|the newly-resurrected Concordia]]. Consider reading the discussion, and making suggestions. I've got to go right now (yet another work-related holiday party - work and play at the same time), see you later! <span class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :I'm sorry to hear that. You might consider doing something else on Wikipedia to take your mind off the crap-storm. There's a great discussion going on at the [[WT:CCD|talk page]] of [[W:CCD|the newly-resurrected Concordia]]. Consider reading the discussion, and making suggestions. I've got to go right now (yet another work-related holiday party - work and play at the same time), see you later! <span class="plainlinks">[[User:NinaEliza|NinaEliza]]&nbsp;([[User talk:NinaEliza|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/NinaEliza|contribs]] <small>•</small> [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username={{urlencode:NinaEliza}}&site=en.wikipedia.org <span style="color:#002bb8">count</span>] <small>•</small> [{{SERVER}}/wiki/Special:Log?user={{urlencode:NinaEliza}} <span style="color:#002bb8">logs</span>] <small>•</small> [[Special:Emailuser/NinaEliza|email]]</span>) 18:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

3878 +++$+++ Gimme danger +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-23 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.295809440E09 +++$+++ Nice catch on that help desk question\/statement\/thing. I would never have thought of that in a million years. :-) -- +++$+++ Nice catch on that help desk question/statement/thing. I would never have thought of that in a million years. :-) --[[User:Gimme danger|Danger]] ([[User talk:Gimme danger|talk]]) 11:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
3879 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3878 +++$+++ 3878 +++$+++ 2011-01-23 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.295814840E09 +++$+++ It occurred to me when I was looking at my watchlist and noticed that the top line of the Toolbox in the sidebar on that page said \u201cRSS\u201d and \u201cAtom\u201d. \u2014 +++$+++ :It occurred to me when I was looking at my watchlist and noticed that the top line of the Toolbox in the sidebar on that page said “RSS” and “Atom”. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 12:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
3880 +++$+++ Gimme danger +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3878 +++$+++ 3879 +++$+++ 2011-01-23 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.295847480E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. Still impressive to a person who can spend a solid hour looking for wallet and keys. -- +++$+++ ::Fair enough. Still impressive to a person who can spend a solid hour looking for wallet and keys. --[[User:Gimme danger|Danger]] ([[User talk:Gimme danger|talk]]) 21:38, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

266023 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-16 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.166331900E09 +++$+++ Wow.  I go away for a few hours, and miss all the excitement!  -- +++$+++ Wow.  I go away for a few hours, and miss all the excitement!  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 21:05, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
266024 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266023 +++$+++ 266023 +++$+++ 2006-12-16 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.166334540E09 +++$+++ Thank you again.  It is nice that you all took care of me. :-D  Thanks also for the star.  Sorry I am so brief.  Nothing personal.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :Thank you again.  It is nice that you all took care of me. :-D  Thanks also for the star.  Sorry I am so brief.  Nothing personal.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 21:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

3881 +++$+++ 24.177.120.74 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-01 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.296554940E09 +++$+++ Even handedness sorta dictates that you drop the same template on  +++$+++ Even handedness sorta dictates that you drop the same template on [[User:Wtshymanski]]. It takes two to edit-war. [[Special:Contributions/24.177.120.74|24.177.120.74]] ([[User talk:24.177.120.74|talk]]) 02:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
3882 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3881 +++$+++ 3881 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.296578460E09 +++$+++ Since your contributions log indicates you are new here, I believed you might not know about Wikipedia\u2019s policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Edit warring]]; so I thought it would be worthwhile to notify you about it. Since Wtshymanski\u2019s contributions log shows he has been editing here since November 2004, I assume that he has become aware of the policy since then; so I believe it would be a waste of effort to notify him. (It\u2019s not a matter of IP bias: I would consider it equally a waste of effort to notify an anon like say [[User:220.101.28.25]], who has over 8000 edits.) But if you seriously believe Wtshymanski needs to be notified of the policy, you are could do it as I easily as I. \u2014 +++$+++ :Since your contributions log indicates you are new here, I believed you might not know about Wikipedia’s policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Edit warring]]; so I thought it would be worthwhile to notify you about it. Since Wtshymanski’s contributions log shows he has been editing here since November 2004, I assume that he has become aware of the policy since then; so I believe it would be a waste of effort to notify him. (It’s not a matter of IP bias: I would consider it equally a waste of effort to notify an anon like say [[User:220.101.28.25]], who has over 8000 edits.) But if you seriously believe Wtshymanski needs to be notified of the policy, you are could do it as I easily as I. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 08:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
3883 +++$+++ 24.177.120.74 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3881 +++$+++ 3882 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.296604620E09 +++$+++ I did. It strikes me as bias-y that you threatened me with a block, and didn't even contact him\/her\/shim, but I'm willing to let it go. Have a pleasant day. [[Special:Contributions\/24.177.120.74|24.177.120.74]] ( +++$+++ ::I did. It strikes me as bias-y that you threatened me with a block, and didn't even contact him/her/shim, but I'm willing to let it go. Have a pleasant day. [[Special:Contributions/24.177.120.74|24.177.120.74]] ([[User talk:24.177.120.74|talk]]) 15:57, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
3884 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3881 +++$+++ 3883 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.296637140E09 +++$+++ Perhaps it is unfortunate that the standard template that I used contained a block threat. I posted it to inform you of the policy, assuming that being aware of it, you would comply (and would not need a block). \u2014 +++$+++ :::Perhaps it is unfortunate that the standard template that I used contained a block threat. I posted it to inform you of the policy, assuming that being aware of it, you would comply (and would not need a block). —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 00:59, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

469645 +++$+++ JoJo +++$+++ JGHowes +++$+++ 469645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-06 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.275859140E09 +++$+++ Hi Jim. R, him say he start article about you.<span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ Hi Jim. R, him say he start article about you.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:JoJo|<b style="color:#00F;"><i>J</i>oJo</b>]] • [[User_talk:JoJo|<span style="color:#C00;">Talk</span>]] • </span>  14:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
469646 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ JGHowes +++$+++ 469645 +++$+++ 469645 +++$+++ 2010-06-09 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.276073820E09 +++$+++ Check your mail. ;0-)<span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Check your mail. ;0-)<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 01:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

611162 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611162 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-25 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.282764060E09 +++$+++ Looking good, but I'd suggest a run through portal peer review first. There are various nitpicking points that occur to me on a lookthrough which, although largely cosmetic rather than structural, would slow down FPoC. If you get some good feedback at PoPR it \"clears the decks\" for FPoC.  Ideally, you want a couple of \"Support, all my issues were addressed at peer review\" comments to encourage others... Up to you, though.  If you go to peer review, let me know in case I overlook it, and I'd suggest asking {{user|Espresso Addict}} for his comments too: he's largely responsible for [[Portal:Cheshire]], which might give you some ideas (it did to me for [[P:OXFORD]], anyway). Regards,  +++$+++ Looking good, but I'd suggest a run through portal peer review first. There are various nitpicking points that occur to me on a lookthrough which, although largely cosmetic rather than structural, would slow down FPoC. If you get some good feedback at PoPR it "clears the decks" for FPoC.  Ideally, you want a couple of "Support, all my issues were addressed at peer review" comments to encourage others... Up to you, though.  If you go to peer review, let me know in case I overlook it, and I'd suggest asking {{user|Espresso Addict}} for his comments too: he's largely responsible for [[Portal:Cheshire]], which might give you some ideas (it did to me for [[P:OXFORD]], anyway). Regards, [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 12:21, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
611163 +++$+++ Espresso Addict +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611162 +++$+++ 611162 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.282977960E09 +++$+++ Hi there -- Bencherlite dropped me a note about the portal -- let me know (preferably via my talk page, as I don't always check my watchlist regularly) if you'd like me to review it, either as part of a formal portal peer review or informally.  +++$+++ :Hi there -- Bencherlite dropped me a note about the portal -- let me know (preferably via my talk page, as I don't always check my watchlist regularly) if you'd like me to review it, either as part of a formal portal peer review or informally. [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] <small>([[User talk:Espresso Addict|talk]])</small> 23:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
611164 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611162 +++$+++ 611163 +++$+++ 2010-08-28 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.282980420E09 +++$+++ I'm about to start the official process now. Stay tuned.  +++$+++ ::I'm about to start the official process now. Stay tuned. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 00:27, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
611165 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611162 +++$+++ 611164 +++$+++ 2010-08-28 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.283006940E09 +++$+++ Excellent.  I see EA has made some good suggestions already; I'll try and take a look in the next few days.  +++$+++ :::Excellent.  I see EA has made some good suggestions already; I'll try and take a look in the next few days. [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 07:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

3885 +++$+++ SteveoJ +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-01 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.296633540E09 +++$+++ I thought it was awkward you would erase that comment, when the user \"bsuorangecrush\" is the one who added fuel to the flame. Instead of taking sides you might want to review the whole converstation, I really don't care if people don't like me on here or not.  +++$+++ I thought it was awkward you would erase that comment, when the user "bsuorangecrush" is the one who added fuel to the flame. Instead of taking sides you might want to review the whole converstation, I really don't care if people don't like me on here or not. [[User:SteveoJ|SteveoJ]] ([[User talk:SteveoJ|talk]]) 23:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
3886 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3885 +++$+++ 3885 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.296634440E09 +++$+++ Although I disagree with his opinion that the logos should be delete and believe his comments would have been better if he had not mentioned you, his post basically stated his opinion and presented rational (if mistaken) arguments why he disagreed with you. In contrast your post was a pure attack and had no redeeming quality. The fact that you felt attacked is no excuse for your attack. \u2014 +++$+++ :Although I disagree with his opinion that the logos should be delete and believe his comments would have been better if he had not mentioned you, his post basically stated his opinion and presented rational (if mistaken) arguments why he disagreed with you. In contrast your post was a pure attack and had no redeeming quality. The fact that you felt attacked is no excuse for your attack. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 00:14, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

3887 +++$+++ Foobarnix +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-20 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.298227380E09 +++$+++ Greetings TEB728:  You were a tremendous help educating me on uploading images.  I have now both uploaded a ''Non-free poster'' at [[For the Love of Movies]] and a Wikimedia photograph with permission at [[Marc Culler]].  I must have done it right because neither image has been taken down yet.  Thank you so much-- +++$+++ Greetings TEB728:  You were a tremendous help educating me on uploading images.  I have now both uploaded a ''Non-free poster'' at [[For the Love of Movies]] and a Wikimedia photograph with permission at [[Marc Culler]].  I must have done it right because neither image has been taken down yet.  Thank you so much--[[User:Foobarnix|Foobarnix]] ([[User talk:Foobarnix|talk]]) 10:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
3888 +++$+++ Foobarnix +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3887 +++$+++ 3887 +++$+++ 2011-02-26 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.298778960E09 +++$+++ I spoke too soon.  Another editor has caused my image [[:File:For the Love of Movies.jpg]] to be seriously reduced in quality.  (He has evidently done this to a lot of people's work.)  It is unclear to me why he did this to my poster.  I thought the template '''Film poster fur''' had taken care of everything.  Do you have any thoughts about this?  Do not waste a lot of time thinking about it if you do not know.  Thanks again as always for your time.-- +++$+++ :I spoke too soon.  Another editor has caused my image [[:File:For the Love of Movies.jpg]] to be seriously reduced in quality.  (He has evidently done this to a lot of people's work.)  It is unclear to me why he did this to my poster.  I thought the template '''Film poster fur''' had taken care of everything.  Do you have any thoughts about this?  Do not waste a lot of time thinking about it if you do not know.  Thanks again as always for your time.--[[User:Foobarnix|Foobarnix]] ([[User talk:Foobarnix|talk]]) 19:56, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
3889 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3887 +++$+++ 3888 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.298823960E09 +++$+++ I agree with the reduction: The (boilerplate) text from the template says, \u201cThe copy is of sufficient resolution for commentary and identification\u2026.\u201d The reduced image is still sufficient for that purpose. The original upload was 17.185x26.559\u201d (at 96 px\/in). That is certainly more resolution than is needed for the purpose. <small>BTW, If you look at the edit history or the file, you will see that it was actually [[User:Sfan00 IMG]] who requested the reduction. [[User:Xnn]] is a user responds to such requests, which is why he does it a lot.<\/small> \u2014 +++$+++ ::I agree with the reduction: The (boilerplate) text from the template says, “The copy is of sufficient resolution for commentary and identification….” The reduced image is still sufficient for that purpose. The original upload was 17.185x26.559” (at 96 px/in). That is certainly more resolution than is needed for the purpose. <small>BTW, If you look at the edit history or the file, you will see that it was actually [[User:Sfan00 IMG]] who requested the reduction. [[User:Xnn]] is a user responds to such requests, which is why he does it a lot.</small> —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 08:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
3890 +++$+++ Foobarnix +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3887 +++$+++ 3887 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.298868480E09 +++$+++ If  I have more or less summed up the situation, could you please just answer \"yes\" here.  Thank you for your time.-- +++$+++ :If  I have more or less summed up the situation, could you please just answer "yes" here.  Thank you for your time.--[[User:Foobarnix|Foobarnix]] ([[User talk:Foobarnix|talk]]) 20:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
3891 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3887 +++$+++ 3890 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.298923020E09 +++$+++ Basically yes: I wouldn't call fair use a loophole; rather it is a feature of copyright law. Wikipedia's non-free content policy is more restrictive than fair use law (For that reason I tend to talk about non-free content rather than fair-use content.) I would say: If you upload a non-free image, make the resolution as low as will fulfil the encyclopedic purpose. \u2014 +++$+++ ::Basically yes: I wouldn't call fair use a loophole; rather it is a feature of copyright law. Wikipedia's non-free content policy is more restrictive than fair use law (For that reason I tend to talk about non-free content rather than fair-use content.) I would say: If you upload a non-free image, make the resolution as low as will fulfil the encyclopedic purpose. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 11:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

524936 +++$+++ DocJohnny +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524936 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-31 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.136095920E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I learn something everyday. Well, on the good days. :) -- +++$+++ Thank you. I learn something everyday. Well, on the good days. :) --[[User:DocJohnny|DocJohnny]] 22:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
524937 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524936 +++$+++ 524936 +++$+++ 2006-01-05 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.136454540E09 +++$+++ I agree. Response is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ANewborn_screening&diff=33916779&oldid=16576462 here.]  But if you want to discuss it further, you may want to consider getting an account (see [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?]] for details). -- +++$+++ : I agree. Response is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ANewborn_screening&diff=33916779&oldid=16576462 here.]  But if you want to discuss it further, you may want to consider getting an account (see [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?]] for details). --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

266034 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-17 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.166343360E09 +++$+++ There are many theories about the origin of the founders of Vijayanagar empire, but all of them concur that the Hoysala empire was never crushed by the Muslim invasion, nor is there any inscriptional proof that the Hoysalas fought wars with founders of Vij. empire. On the contrary, irrespective of where the founders of Vijayanagar empire came from (Karnataka or Andhra Pradesh), by 1336, they were in association with Hoysala Veera Ballala II. When Ballala II was busy fighting the sultan of Madurai in the south, Harihara I, founder of Vij. empire had a free hand at dealing with muslim invasion from the north. In fact inscriptions prove Harihara I was married to a daughter of Hoysala commander. The citation given is an important proof.thanks +++$+++ There are many theories about the origin of the founders of Vijayanagar empire, but all of them concur that the Hoysala empire was never crushed by the Muslim invasion, nor is there any inscriptional proof that the Hoysalas fought wars with founders of Vij. empire. On the contrary, irrespective of where the founders of Vijayanagar empire came from (Karnataka or Andhra Pradesh), by 1336, they were in association with Hoysala Veera Ballala II. When Ballala II was busy fighting the sultan of Madurai in the south, Harihara I, founder of Vij. empire had a free hand at dealing with muslim invasion from the north. In fact inscriptions prove Harihara I was married to a daughter of Hoysala commander. The citation given is an important proof.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
266035 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266034 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.166344140E09 +++$+++ I do not want to go deep into Vijayanagar empire as this may confuse the reader. So we should keep away from it. Also, the Vishnuvardhana in para 3 and 4 look ok i think.thanks +++$+++ ::I do not want to go deep into Vijayanagar empire as this may confuse the reader. So we should keep away from it. Also, the Vishnuvardhana in para 3 and 4 look ok i think.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

528179 +++$+++ EmperorBrandon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-03 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.191450060E09 +++$+++ Why was this article deleted? The deletion log says \"blatant advertising\", but there was no advertising on the page, at very least not \"blatant\" and worthy for speedy deletion. Karen Strassman is notable for many roles in anime and video games. -- +++$+++ Why was this article deleted? The deletion log says "blatant advertising", but there was no advertising on the page, at very least not "blatant" and worthy for speedy deletion. Karen Strassman is notable for many roles in anime and video games. --[[User:EmperorBrandon|EmperorBrandon]] 15:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
528180 +++$+++ Until(1 == 2) +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528179 +++$+++ 528179 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.191450240E09 +++$+++ I have to say that does not look like a G11 to me either. ( +++$+++ :I have to say that does not look like a G11 to me either. ([[User:Until(1 == 2)|(<font color="blue">1 <font color="maroon">==</font> 2</font>)]] ? ([[User talk:Until(1 == 2)|('<font color="maroon">Stop</font>') : ('<font color="Green">Go</font>')]]) 15:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
528181 +++$+++ EmperorBrandon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528179 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191462660E09 +++$+++ I won't dispute that the trivia is unnecessary, but a list of roles is pretty common for actor entries. I always thought it was pretty important, too. Why were all the links to the article removed? -- +++$+++ :::I won't dispute that the trivia is unnecessary, but a list of roles is pretty common for actor entries. I always thought it was pretty important, too. Why were all the links to the article removed? --[[User:EmperorBrandon|EmperorBrandon]] 18:51, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
528182 +++$+++ EmperorBrandon +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528179 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.191464340E09 +++$+++ Well, it's pretty common for voice actor entries. Not saying that's a good thing, but it tends to be hard to find verifiable biographical information on some, since some of them prefer voice acting because of the anonymity it provides. Since the deleting links was a mistake, it's not problem if I restore them, right? -- +++$+++ :::::Well, it's pretty common for voice actor entries. Not saying that's a good thing, but it tends to be hard to find verifiable biographical information on some, since some of them prefer voice acting because of the anonymity it provides. Since the deleting links was a mistake, it's not problem if I restore them, right? --[[User:EmperorBrandon|EmperorBrandon]] 19:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
528183 +++$+++ Until(1 == 2) +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528179 +++$+++ 528179 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.191450480E09 +++$+++ Hmm. I can understand that interpretation, though not an interpretation I would make. Fair enough for me. ( +++$+++ :Hmm. I can understand that interpretation, though not an interpretation I would make. Fair enough for me. ([[User:Until(1 == 2)|(<font color="blue">1 <font color="maroon">==</font> 2</font>)]] ? ([[User talk:Until(1 == 2)|('<font color="maroon">Stop</font>') : ('<font color="Green">Go</font>')]]) 15:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

3892 +++$+++ Sardaka +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-28 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.298918040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your answer on my shots not showing up in the category at commons, but the problem is still there. The file is at commons, but if you look at the category itself, the pix aren't there, but they were a couple of weeks ago. They should still be there, as that category is listed on their edit pages.  +++$+++ Thanks for your answer on my shots not showing up in the category at commons, but the problem is still there. The file is at commons, but if you look at the category itself, the pix aren't there, but they were a couple of weeks ago. They should still be there, as that category is listed on their edit pages. [[User:Sardaka|Sardaka]] ([[User talk:Sardaka|talk]]) 10:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
3893 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3892 +++$+++ 3892 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.298922360E09 +++$+++ I see it at [[Commons:Category:Buildings and structures at night]]. It is the 4th file in the top row. \u2014 +++$+++ :I see it at [[Commons:Category:Buildings and structures at night]]. It is the 4th file in the top row. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 11:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

88030 +++$+++ Mesoderm +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ 88030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.310198580E09 +++$+++ ~  +++$+++ ~ [[User:Mesoderm|Mesoderm]] ([[User talk:Mesoderm|talk]]) 01:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
88031 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ 88030 +++$+++ 88030 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.310199120E09 +++$+++ Okay.  I may not have time for a full look but I'll change my note to make clear that I'm not opposing a distinction between indiscriminate lists and real evaluation of popular culture.  -  +++$+++ :Okay.  I may not have time for a full look but I'll change my note to make clear that I'm not opposing a distinction between indiscriminate lists and real evaluation of popular culture.  - [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon#top|talk]]) 01:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
88032 +++$+++ Mesoderm +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ 88030 +++$+++ 88031 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.310199780E09 +++$+++ Thank you. And I'd welcome any suggestions on how to improve my proposal (or a better way altogether to deal with the situation) before I take it to an RFC (all I'm trying to do at [[WP:VPP]] is fix any obvious problems with the proposal before offering it up for an RFC discussion). Cheers. ~  +++$+++ ::Thank you. And I'd welcome any suggestions on how to improve my proposal (or a better way altogether to deal with the situation) before I take it to an RFC (all I'm trying to do at [[WP:VPP]] is fix any obvious problems with the proposal before offering it up for an RFC discussion). Cheers. ~ [[User:Mesoderm|Mesoderm]] ([[User talk:Mesoderm|talk]]) 01:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

3894 +++$+++ Pfa +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-05 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.299321780E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your help regarding Eleonora and Ethel Olson.  I also added a 1905 public domain photo of William F. Kirk to Wikimedia Commons.  I must have done something wrong because the file history of this jpg. file shows four separate images even though they're all identical.  Is there any way to clean this up?  Thanks for any advice in this matter.  +++$+++ Thanks again for your help regarding Eleonora and Ethel Olson.  I also added a 1905 public domain photo of William F. Kirk to Wikimedia Commons.  I must have done something wrong because the file history of this jpg. file shows four separate images even though they're all identical.  Is there any way to clean this up?  Thanks for any advice in this matter. [[User:Pfa|Pfa]] ([[User talk:Pfa|talk]]) 02:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
3895 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3894 +++$+++ 3894 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.299507120E09 +++$+++ I suspect that there is no way to delete the old versions of [[:File:William F. Kirk 1905.jpg]]. I know there is no way to delete old version of text pages. \u2014 +++$+++ :I suspect that there is no way to delete the old versions of [[:File:William F. Kirk 1905.jpg]]. I know there is no way to delete old version of text pages. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 06:12, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

266040 +++$+++ Ekajati +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-17 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.166358360E09 +++$+++ Only if you can stick to the facts and not put your own spin on them. Otherwise, I'll happily wait for someone else to fill me in. I'm about to log off anyway...  +++$+++ Only if you can stick to the facts and not put your own spin on them. Otherwise, I'll happily wait for someone else to fill me in. I'm about to log off anyway... [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] ([[User talk:Ekajati|yakity-yak]]) 04:26, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
266041 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266040 +++$+++ 266040 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.166397480E09 +++$+++ I do not know what you are referring to above. Please do not post on my talk page again. Sincerely,   +++$+++ :I do not know what you are referring to above. Please do not post on my talk page again. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 15:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
266042 +++$+++ Ekajati +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266040 +++$+++ 266041 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.166403120E09 +++$+++ I was ''replying'' to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEkajati&diff=94829637&oldid=94523571 this comment] that you posted on my talk page only hours ago. Don't tell me you've forgotten it. If you have, please see a doctor. I am coming to believe that you have a serious memory problem. First, you can't remember what your sockpuppets have done; now, you can't remember posting a comment on my talk page long enough for my immediate reply to make sense to you. Either somebody else was logged in as you, or you may be developing a case of senile dementia. This is not meant as either a diagnosis or a personal attack, but as a sincere wish that if you are indeed experiencing memory problems, that you immediately seek professional assistance for them.  +++$+++ ::I was ''replying'' to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEkajati&diff=94829637&oldid=94523571 this comment] that you posted on my talk page only hours ago. Don't tell me you've forgotten it. If you have, please see a doctor. I am coming to believe that you have a serious memory problem. First, you can't remember what your sockpuppets have done; now, you can't remember posting a comment on my talk page long enough for my immediate reply to make sense to you. Either somebody else was logged in as you, or you may be developing a case of senile dementia. This is not meant as either a diagnosis or a personal attack, but as a sincere wish that if you are indeed experiencing memory problems, that you immediately seek professional assistance for them. [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]] ([[User talk:Ekajati|yakity-yak]]) 16:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

528185 +++$+++ Jeffq +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528185 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-03 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.191461880E09 +++$+++ I would appreciate an explanation of why you failed even to acknowledge this dispute or my explanation. I am concerned that this evidence that the {{tl|di-replaceable fair use disputed}} template is meaningless, used only to mislead editors into believing falsely that they may dispute the formally unremovable {{tl|di-replaceable fair use}} placed not by lawyers but just by other editors. I have raised this possibility at [[Template talk:Di-replaceable fair use disputed#Dispute rejected]], where you might want to comment as well. ~  +++$+++ I would appreciate an explanation of why you failed even to acknowledge this dispute or my explanation. I am concerned that this evidence that the {{tl|di-replaceable fair use disputed}} template is meaningless, used only to mislead editors into believing falsely that they may dispute the formally unremovable {{tl|di-replaceable fair use}} placed not by lawyers but just by other editors. I have raised this possibility at [[Template talk:Di-replaceable fair use disputed#Dispute rejected]], where you might want to comment as well. ~ [[User:Jeffq|Jeff Q]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Jeffq|(talk)]] 18:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
528186 +++$+++ Jeffq +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528185 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-04 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.191481500E09 +++$+++ Your summary for the deletion suggests that you did not even read the don't-delete rationale. I do not assume that the presence of a {{tl|di-replaceable fair use disputed}} necessarily means to keep an image, but there should be some accounting for whether disputes are even considered when executing a deletion request. Since the dispute rationale is deleted along with the image, this information is known only to administrators and cannot be reviewed by the community for appropriateness, which conflicts with the Wikipedia idea of resolving disputes publically. Should I interpret your argument above to mean that administrators deleting images are not expected to show they even considered counterarguments, and may delete tagged images with impunity, regardless of any dispute? This is certainly what the result feels like. In fact, the whole system seems to be, as I suggested above, primarily designed to expediently rid the community of images that any editor can tag, without regard to counterarguments. I'd like to see evidence to the contrary. ~  +++$+++ :: Your summary for the deletion suggests that you did not even read the don't-delete rationale. I do not assume that the presence of a {{tl|di-replaceable fair use disputed}} necessarily means to keep an image, but there should be some accounting for whether disputes are even considered when executing a deletion request. Since the dispute rationale is deleted along with the image, this information is known only to administrators and cannot be reviewed by the community for appropriateness, which conflicts with the Wikipedia idea of resolving disputes publically. Should I interpret your argument above to mean that administrators deleting images are not expected to show they even considered counterarguments, and may delete tagged images with impunity, regardless of any dispute? This is certainly what the result feels like. In fact, the whole system seems to be, as I suggested above, primarily designed to expediently rid the community of images that any editor can tag, without regard to counterarguments. I'd like to see evidence to the contrary. ~ [[User:Jeffq|Jeff Q]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Jeffq|(talk)]] 00:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

3898 +++$+++ The Founders Intent +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.300867320E09 +++$+++ I corrected your edit because I corrected the spelling of the entire article title. GROW THE HECK UP!!!!! -- +++$+++ I corrected your edit because I corrected the spelling of the entire article title. GROW THE HECK UP!!!!! --[[User:The Founders Intent|<font color="green">'''''T<small>HE</small> F<small>OUNDERS</small> I<small>NTENT </small>'''''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The Founders Intent|''PRAISE'']]</sup>  01:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
3899 +++$+++ The Founders Intent +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3898 +++$+++ 3898 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.300872840E09 +++$+++ Please stay off my talk page. I'll ask you once. -- +++$+++ :Please stay off my talk page. I'll ask you once. --[[User:The Founders Intent|<font color="green">'''''T<small>HE</small> F<small>OUNDERS</small> I<small>NTENT </small>'''''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The Founders Intent|''PRAISE'']]</sup>  02:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
3900 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3898 +++$+++ 3898 +++$+++ 2011-04-05 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.302013380E09 +++$+++ \"Free\" means \"free of restriction\" not \"free of cost.\" Specifically, a free image is one the may be reused by anyone for anything, including commercial use and modification. See [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria]] for the policy. Specifically see [[WP:NFCC#9]] for why a non-free image may be used only in an article. \u2014 +++$+++ :"Free" means "free of restriction" not "free of cost." Specifically, a free image is one the may be reused by anyone for anything, including commercial use and modification. See [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria]] for the policy. Specifically see [[WP:NFCC#9]] for why a non-free image may be used only in an article. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 07:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
3901 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3898 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-05 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.302015240E09 +++$+++ Thank you for clarifying the status. \u2014 +++$+++ ***Thank you for clarifying the status. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 07:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

506414 +++$+++ Funandtrvl +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506414 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-10 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.294718520E09 +++$+++ Hi- it's not the category that's causing the problem, this is the problematic revision: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_United_States\/Quality_content&diff=next&oldid=388726934]. I've seen this happen before, but I haven't figured it out either, yet! -- +++$+++ Hi- it's not the category that's causing the problem, this is the problematic revision: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_United_States/Quality_content&diff=next&oldid=388726934]. I've seen this happen before, but I haven't figured it out either, yet! --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 20:02, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
506415 +++$+++ Funandtrvl +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506414 +++$+++ 506414 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.294733880E09 +++$+++ It's fixed, needed to remove this code: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_United_States%2FQuality_content&action=historysubmit&diff=407171758&oldid=406328221]. -- +++$+++ :It's fixed, needed to remove this code: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_United_States%2FQuality_content&action=historysubmit&diff=407171758&oldid=406328221]. --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 00:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
506416 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506414 +++$+++ 506415 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.294733940E09 +++$+++ Thanks I fiddled with it for about an hour and couldn't figure it out. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks I fiddled with it for about an hour and couldn't figure it out. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 00:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

528188 +++$+++ THE IMPERIOUS DORK +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528188 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-06 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.191669840E09 +++$+++ Hi, good day! Please undelete the \"Image:Ls_coverspecial.jpg\", as it is uploaded by a member of the student newspaper concerned ([[Heraldo Filipino]]), and thus has been legitimately uploaded. Thank you.  +++$+++ Hi, good day! Please undelete the "Image:Ls_coverspecial.jpg", as it is uploaded by a member of the student newspaper concerned ([[Heraldo Filipino]]), and thus has been legitimately uploaded. Thank you. [[User:THE IMPERIOUS DORK|THE IMPERIOUS DORK]] 04:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
528189 +++$+++ Jéské Couriano +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528188 +++$+++ 528188 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.191670260E09 +++$+++ That doesn't necessarily legitimize it. -<font color=\"008000\">'' +++$+++ :That doesn't necessarily legitimize it. -<font color="008000">''[[User:Jéské Couriano|Jéské]]''</font> <small><sup>(<font color="0000FF">[[User talk:Jéské Couriano|v^_^v]]</font> <font color="FF7F50">[[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|Kacheek!]]</font>)</sup></small> 04:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
528190 +++$+++ AGK +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528188 +++$+++ 528188 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.192068420E09 +++$+++ Please [[Wikipedia:Civility|remain civil]] at all times on Wikipedia, and refrain from [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|making personal attacks]]. Doing so, especially in an extreme or abusive manner, can result in your editing privileges being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|revoked]], which will mean you cannot edit Wikipedia. If you require any assistance on Wikipedia matters, please feel free to contact myself or another user - but please do so in a civil and friendly manner. Kind regards, <span style=\"font-family:Verdana;font-size:9pt;\">[[User:AGK|<font color=\"green\">'''Anth\xf8ny'''<\/font>]]  +++$+++ :Please [[Wikipedia:Civility|remain civil]] at all times on Wikipedia, and refrain from [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|making personal attacks]]. Doing so, especially in an extreme or abusive manner, can result in your editing privileges being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|revoked]], which will mean you cannot edit Wikipedia. If you require any assistance on Wikipedia matters, please feel free to contact myself or another user - but please do so in a civil and friendly manner. Kind regards, <span style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:9pt;">[[User:AGK|<font color="green">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] [[User:AGK/Contact|<font color="green">'''ん'''</font>]]</span> 19:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

524938 +++$+++ Mike Selinker +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-06 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.136550060E09 +++$+++ If you like what I've been doing, you should also give props to [[User:Meegs]] and the rest of the gang over at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League]].-- +++$+++ If you like what I've been doing, you should also give props to [[User:Meegs]] and the rest of the gang over at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League]].--[[User:Mike Selinker|Mike Selinker]] 04:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
524939 +++$+++ Meegs +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524938 +++$+++ 524938 +++$+++ 2006-01-07 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.136686140E09 +++$+++ Props not necessary ;)  My thoughts on the infobox are at [[User_talk:Meegs#databasefootball]]. '''''\xd7''''' +++$+++ *Props not necessary ;)  My thoughts on the infobox are at [[User_talk:Meegs#databasefootball]]. '''''×'''''[[User:Meegs|Meegs]] 18:09, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
524940 +++$+++ Meegs +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524938 +++$+++ 524938 +++$+++ 2006-01-07 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.136689440E09 +++$+++ and [[User_talk:Meegs#databasefootball|more]] '''''\xd7''''' +++$+++ *and [[User_talk:Meegs#databasefootball|more]] '''''×'''''[[User:Meegs|Meegs]] 19:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
524941 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524938 +++$+++ 524938 +++$+++ 2006-01-09 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.136879220E09 +++$+++ If you'd like, I'd be happy to talk about your concerns, but it's hard for me to do so while you're still an anon. -- +++$+++ :If you'd like, I'd be happy to talk about your concerns, but it's hard for me to do so while you're still an anon. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

3903 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-13 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.302763260E09 +++$+++ Not that I want to discourage you from looking more, but I'm a woman of my word. :) I really am grateful. I hate that this has come up at such a bad time for Tony, especially. :\/ -- +++$+++ Not that I want to discourage you from looking more, but I'm a woman of my word. :) I really am grateful. I hate that this has come up at such a bad time for Tony, especially. :/ --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 23:41, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
3904 +++$+++ VernoWhitney +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3903 +++$+++ 3903 +++$+++ 2011-04-19 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.303239780E09 +++$+++ @TEB728: FYI, I commented more at that discussion regarding which images can be relabeled. Since it's moved up on the page I didn't want it to be overlooked.  +++$+++ :@TEB728: FYI, I commented more at that discussion regarding which images can be relabeled. Since it's moved up on the page I didn't want it to be overlooked. [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 12:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
3905 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3903 +++$+++ 3904 +++$+++ 2011-04-19 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.303278840E09 +++$+++ I just now replied there. \u2014 +++$+++ ::I just now replied there. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 22:54, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

528193 +++$+++ Flyguy649 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-15 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.192449660E09 +++$+++ Pascal.Tesson suggested your script, and I have to say it rocks! It almost makes me want to delete more! Cheers! --  +++$+++ Pascal.Tesson suggested your script, and I have to say it rocks! It almost makes me want to delete more! Cheers! -- [[User:Flyguy649|Flyguy649]] [[User talk:Flyguy649|<sup>talk]]</sup> 05:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
528194 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528193 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-16 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.192525800E09 +++$+++ Ditto. Total bow-downness. :) -- +++$+++ ::Ditto. Total bow-downness. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 02:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

3909 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3909 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-30 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.304172360E09 +++$+++ Hi TEB, thanks for helping me keep the Varian images.  However,  I noticed you tossed the Ansel Adams credit on the [[Russell and Sigurd Varian]] photos.  Now I did look at the WP guidelines that normally discourage such things, and here I think there is a place to make an exception:  [[Ansel Adams]] was, of course, a very famous photographer, and he also happened to be a good personal friend of both men, but Russell in particular.  For that reason, I think the credit is relevant here and within the scope of the WP guidelines.  But I'd be curious to see if you concur or not.   +++$+++ Hi TEB, thanks for helping me keep the Varian images.  However,  I noticed you tossed the Ansel Adams credit on the [[Russell and Sigurd Varian]] photos.  Now I did look at the WP guidelines that normally discourage such things, and here I think there is a place to make an exception:  [[Ansel Adams]] was, of course, a very famous photographer, and he also happened to be a good personal friend of both men, but Russell in particular.  For that reason, I think the credit is relevant here and within the scope of the WP guidelines.  But I'd be curious to see if you concur or not.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 07:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
3910 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3909 +++$+++ 3909 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.304178720E09 +++$+++ I was about to reply that Adams wasn't mention in the article, but on checking he is. So OK. (Interesting guys!) \u2014 +++$+++ :I was about to reply that Adams wasn't mention in the article, but on checking he is. So OK. (Interesting guys!) —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 08:52, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
3911 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3909 +++$+++ 3910 +++$+++ 2011-05-03 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.304472420E09 +++$+++ Interesting family.  I got to this via writing the [[Sheila Varian]] article.   +++$+++ ::Interesting family.  I got to this via writing the [[Sheila Varian]] article.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 18:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

612321 +++$+++ Jtdirl +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-15 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.153032540E09 +++$+++ BTW, I know I have been a bit sharp with you. For the last few weeks I have been suffering from crippling [[sciatica]] and it is extremely painful. (I am popping [[codeine]], [[valium]] and [[diffene]] and other tablets like smarties.) The pain hasn't helped my mood and if I offended I apologise. I want the article to be NPOV. I don't want an Irish Nationalist article (given the criticism republicans give me here, being called an Irish Nationalist was a bit of a change. Usually they call me a Unionist or a [[West Brit]]!!!) But neither to I want it ''merely'' to convey a British viewpoint that is not shared by millions of Irish people in Ireland and tens of millions internationally. It can all be done in a way that gives the reader a clear undertanding of what is generally meant by ''British Isles'', what some mean by ''British Isles'', why there is a discrepancy in meanings, and all other facts on the topic.  +++$+++ BTW, I know I have been a bit sharp with you. For the last few weeks I have been suffering from crippling [[sciatica]] and it is extremely painful. (I am popping [[codeine]], [[valium]] and [[diffene]] and other tablets like smarties.) The pain hasn't helped my mood and if I offended I apologise. I want the article to be NPOV. I don't want an Irish Nationalist article (given the criticism republicans give me here, being called an Irish Nationalist was a bit of a change. Usually they call me a Unionist or a [[West Brit]]!!!) But neither to I want it ''merely'' to convey a British viewpoint that is not shared by millions of Irish people in Ireland and tens of millions internationally. It can all be done in a way that gives the reader a clear undertanding of what is generally meant by ''British Isles'', what some mean by ''British Isles'', why there is a discrepancy in meanings, and all other facts on the topic. [[User:Jtdirl|<span style="color:green; background-color:pink">'''Fear''ÉIREANN'''''</span>]][[Image:Ireland-Capitals.PNG|15px]]\<sup><font color="blue">[[User talk:Jtdirl|(caint)]]</font></sup> 23:49, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
612322 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612321 +++$+++ 612321 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.153051980E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'll try to come back to this, but firstly I do appreciate the offence that can be given by an outmoded name with overtones, and have wanted from the outset to get this point over without overwhelming the matter that there's a geographical entity with a usual name that is thought of as valid by many people who know and accept that there are two sovereign states. With tact and diplomacy on both sides I think we can get there, and we'll have to present it solidly so that hotheads promoting either extreme viewpoint can be properly convinced. The subject is important and complex enough that there's a case for in independent page giving full backing detail to a clear and concise statement covering all the main points in a section on this page: the point you make about placing that section is certainly worth considering. By the way, Charles is styled \"Ra Chooky Rossi\" here. And last but not least,  sorry to hear about the sciatica which sounds really awful: hope that improves soon. ... +++$+++ :Thanks. I'll try to come back to this, but firstly I do appreciate the offence that can be given by an outmoded name with overtones, and have wanted from the outset to get this point over without overwhelming the matter that there's a geographical entity with a usual name that is thought of as valid by many people who know and accept that there are two sovereign states. With tact and diplomacy on both sides I think we can get there, and we'll have to present it solidly so that hotheads promoting either extreme viewpoint can be properly convinced. The subject is important and complex enough that there's a case for in independent page giving full backing detail to a clear and concise statement covering all the main points in a section on this page: the point you make about placing that section is certainly worth considering. By the way, Charles is styled "Ra Chooky Rossi" here. And last but not least,  sorry to hear about the sciatica which sounds really awful: hope that improves soon. ...[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 05:13, 16 July 2006 (UTC) modified 05:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
612323 +++$+++ Mais oui! +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612321 +++$+++ 612322 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.153079460E09 +++$+++ And there was me thinking that he was the [[Duke of Rothesay]]. Good luck with the British Isles page. -- +++$+++ ::And there was me thinking that he was the [[Duke of Rothesay]]. Good luck with the British Isles page. --[[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] 12:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
612324 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612321 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.153093920E09 +++$+++ Source: [[Malky McCormick]] \"the Big Yin\" cartoons, [[Sunday Mail (Scotland)|Sunday Mail]] in the 70s. Scottish humour can be harsh and not cross boundaries well: one 'toon has Charles in naval uniform singing ''\"Ra girl that I marry, will huv tae be.. As soft an' as sweet, an' a Proddy, like me.\"'' .. +++$+++ ::::Source: [[Malky McCormick]] "the Big Yin" cartoons, [[Sunday Mail (Scotland)|Sunday Mail]] in the 70s. Scottish humour can be harsh and not cross boundaries well: one 'toon has Charles in naval uniform singing ''"Ra girl that I marry, will huv tae be.. As soft an' as sweet, an' a Proddy, like me."'' ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 16:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
612325 +++$+++ MelForbes +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612321 +++$+++ 612323 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.153084080E09 +++$+++ Dave, just came across an edit of yours on [[The Patriot Game]]. Interesting,  I drank [[Guinness]] with [[Dominic Behan]], and on more than a couple of occasions. He lived in Scotland for about the last ten years of his life.  +++$+++ :::Dave, just came across an edit of yours on [[The Patriot Game]]. Interesting,  I drank [[Guinness]] with [[Dominic Behan]], and on more than a couple of occasions. He lived in Scotland for about the last ten years of his life. [[User:MelForbes|MelForbes]] 14:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
612326 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612321 +++$+++ 612325 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.153093920E09 +++$+++ Most impressive! Milne's or Sandy Bell's by any chance? Heard the song in '60s folk clubs where the folly of nationalism angle came out more, so slightly surprised when I bought the Dubliners' version more recently. .. +++$+++ ::::Most impressive! Milne's or Sandy Bell's by any chance? Heard the song in '60s folk clubs where the folly of nationalism angle came out more, so slightly surprised when I bought the Dubliners' version more recently. ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 16:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

3912 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-30 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.306746900E09 +++$+++ As I say - a tiny, tiny quibble. Please keep up the good work; your answers are generally excellent. Cheers, <small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ As I say - a tiny, tiny quibble. Please keep up the good work; your answers are generally excellent. Cheers, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 02:15, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
3913 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3912 +++$+++ 3912 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.306747560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the feedback. \u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks for the feedback. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 02:26, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

528203 +++$+++ T3Smile +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-17 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.192676280E09 +++$+++ how do you fix that?  And, what is the proces to get document protection, even for a short time? (For My Reference).  Do I ask an admin for such or is there a quick and easy process?  ta. -- +++$+++ how do you fix that?  And, what is the proces to get document protection, even for a short time? (For My Reference).  Do I ask an admin for such or is there a quick and easy process?  ta. --[[User:T3Smile|T3Smile]] 19:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
528204 +++$+++ Cowman109 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528203 +++$+++ 528203 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.192696740E09 +++$+++ Don't be silly. The page says on the top that people should respect others' privacy wishes. Plus blocking yourself theoretically could have caused collateral damage I think unless the wiki software changed again since I last checked, but that's just a mere technicality.  So, I've unblocked you. <font color=\"DarkGreen\"> +++$+++ :Don't be silly. The page says on the top that people should respect others' privacy wishes. Plus blocking yourself theoretically could have caused collateral damage I think unless the wiki software changed again since I last checked, but that's just a mere technicality.  So, I've unblocked you. <font color="DarkGreen">[[User:Cowman109|Cowman109]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Cowman109|Talk]]</sup> 01:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
528205 +++$+++ Until(1 == 2) +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528203 +++$+++ 528204 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.192696860E09 +++$+++ Blocking yourself is childish man. I like you and all, but it had to be said.  +++$+++ ::Blocking yourself is childish man. I like you and all, but it had to be said. [[User talk:Until(1 == 2)|<font color="blue">1 <font color="maroon">!=</font> 2</font>]] 01:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
528206 +++$+++ InkSplotch +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528203 +++$+++ 528205 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.192703460E09 +++$+++ Besides, you forgot to warn yourself first.  I think there's a template for that...  -- +++$+++ :::Besides, you forgot to warn yourself first.  I think there's a template for that...  --[[User:InkSplotch|InkSplotch]] 03:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

3916 +++$+++ FightingMac +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.309784940E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your attention. Obliged.  +++$+++ Thank you for your attention. Obliged. [[User:FightingMac|FightingMac]] ([[User talk:FightingMac|talk]]) 06:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
3917 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3916 +++$+++ 3916 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.309793220E09 +++$+++ <small>I have changed the section title to the real topic of this discussion (as is my right on my talk page).<\/small> \u2014 +++$+++ :<small>I have changed the section title to the real topic of this discussion (as is my right on my talk page).</small> —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 08:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
3918 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3916 +++$+++ 3917 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.309838340E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ ::—[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 20:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
3919 +++$+++ FightingMac +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3916 +++$+++ 3917 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.309843440E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your time and attention. Appreciated. I will let you know if I do elevate and cite you.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for your time and attention. Appreciated. I will let you know if I do elevate and cite you. [[User:FightingMac|FightingMac]] ([[User talk:FightingMac|talk]]) 22:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
3920 +++$+++ FightingMac +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3916 +++$+++ 3919 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.309855560E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for providing the translation of Mich\xe8le Sabban. I've added the standard Translation template (which gets it categorised as a translated page, put the Brit flag on it (assuming you're Brit, change it to American otherwise) and added Wikiproject France. Thanks again. Appreciated.  +++$+++ :::Thank you very much for providing the translation of Michèle Sabban. I've added the standard Translation template (which gets it categorised as a translated page, put the Brit flag on it (assuming you're Brit, change it to American otherwise) and added Wikiproject France. Thanks again. Appreciated. [[User:FightingMac|FightingMac]] ([[User talk:FightingMac|talk]]) 01:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

266061 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-17 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.166428200E09 +++$+++ In the temple building para, I wanted to make a mention of competition in temple building and this sentence got lost along the way. The Hoysaleswara temple was actually built in competition (i will provide citation) to Chennakesava temple while both are considered secular. Try to squeeze in the word competition or something equivalent, while the Somanathapura temple was a strict Vaishnava temple (you removed the sentence earlier). Maybe we need to put it back here and mention it was a strictly Vaisnhava temple. In fact the image if Kesava temple at Somanathapura has been included because the sentence existed. thanks. +++$+++ In the temple building para, I wanted to make a mention of competition in temple building and this sentence got lost along the way. The Hoysaleswara temple was actually built in competition (i will provide citation) to Chennakesava temple while both are considered secular. Try to squeeze in the word competition or something equivalent, while the Somanathapura temple was a strict Vaishnava temple (you removed the sentence earlier). Maybe we need to put it back here and mention it was a strictly Vaisnhava temple. In fact the image if Kesava temple at Somanathapura has been included because the sentence existed. thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:50, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
266062 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266061 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.166429400E09 +++$+++ Please take a look now at SOCIETY last para.thanks. +++$+++ ::Please take a look now at SOCIETY last para.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
266063 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266061 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.166431980E09 +++$+++ User Nichalp (main reviewer) wanted me to inform him when the edits were done. Do you think its time.Thanks. +++$+++ ::User Nichalp (main reviewer) wanted me to inform him when the edits were done. Do you think its time.Thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
266064 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266061 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.166434560E09 +++$+++ I see that this article is almost finished.  Great job!  It must be satisfying.  -- +++$+++ :::I see that this article is almost finished.  Great job!  It must be satisfying.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 01:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

528208 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528208 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.193276100E09 +++$+++ Just making sure. You deleted [[:Image:L&H Our Relations 1936.jpg]] way back in June with the comment ''CSD I5: Is unused and not free''. However, the [[Special:Whatlinkshere\/Image:L%26H_Our_Relations_1936.jpg |What links here page for that image]] doesn't work. There is something that used it, namely the page about movie in question [[Our Relations]], but it's not listed in what links here. Any objection if I restore the poster? -- +++$+++ Just making sure. You deleted [[:Image:L&H Our Relations 1936.jpg]] way back in June with the comment ''CSD I5: Is unused and not free''. However, the [[Special:Whatlinkshere/Image:L%26H_Our_Relations_1936.jpg |What links here page for that image]] doesn't work. There is something that used it, namely the page about movie in question [[Our Relations]], but it's not listed in what links here. Any objection if I restore the poster? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
528209 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528208 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.193276400E09 +++$+++ That was fast, thanks! -- +++$+++ :: That was fast, thanks! --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

3921 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.309894380E09 +++$+++ I'm not ignoring you. My slowness in replying is because you give a lot to reply to, and I have other things to do. \u2014 +++$+++ I'm not ignoring you. My slowness in replying is because you give a lot to reply to, and I have other things to do. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 12:33, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
3922 +++$+++ FightingMac +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3921 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.309911780E09 +++$+++ No need to respond TEB. Just thanks from me. And absolutely creating the stub must have taken you some time. It is appreciated but perhaps you better understand the point about it not always being practicable to do. There's also [[:fr:Ir\xe8ne Th\xe9ry | Ir\xe8ne Th\xe9ry]] to be getting on with. :-)  +++$+++ :::: No need to respond TEB. Just thanks from me. And absolutely creating the stub must have taken you some time. It is appreciated but perhaps you better understand the point about it not always being practicable to do. There's also [[:fr:Irène Théry | Irène Théry]] to be getting on with. :-) [[User:FightingMac|FightingMac]] ([[User talk:FightingMac|talk]]) 17:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

528211 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-25 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.193342520E09 +++$+++ I agree that you seem to have been a little hasty in presuming that a Bot was used - the deletion summary is actually totally compatible with human review. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ I agree that you seem to have been a little hasty in presuming that a Bot was used - the deletion summary is actually totally compatible with human review. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 13:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
528212 +++$+++ Jerry +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.193472540E09 +++$+++ It was not a cropped screenshot of a movie still.  As I had stated in the upload summary, I created it myself using mspaint, and it represented what I saw in the movie.  It was used to illustrate the scene in the movie, as discussed in an article, without the image, the discussion is potentially difficult for readers to understand if they have not seen the movie.  The person who reverted my license change should have left me a note on my talk page.   Based on the information available to me, as a non-admin, (eg. not able to review edit summaries for deleted content), it looked like the image was deleted with my license still there, and therefore like the deleter did not read the edit summaries but rather reacted to a category list from the concern tag, hence my question (not accusation) about bot-like edits.  Bringing up [[WP:AGF]] seems without merit. <i> +++$+++ ::It was not a cropped screenshot of a movie still.  As I had stated in the upload summary, I created it myself using mspaint, and it represented what I saw in the movie.  It was used to illustrate the scene in the movie, as discussed in an article, without the image, the discussion is potentially difficult for readers to understand if they have not seen the movie.  The person who reverted my license change should have left me a note on my talk page.   Based on the information available to me, as a non-admin, (eg. not able to review edit summaries for deleted content), it looked like the image was deleted with my license still there, and therefore like the deleter did not read the edit summaries but rather reacted to a category list from the concern tag, hence my question (not accusation) about bot-like edits.  Bringing up [[WP:AGF]] seems without merit. <i>[[User:Jerry|JERRY]]</i> <sup>[[User Talk:Jerry|talk]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jerry|contribs]]</sub> 01:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

266068 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266068 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-18 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.166481840E09 +++$+++ Look at the archives just below.thanks. +++$+++ Look at the archives just below.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 14:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
266069 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266068 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.166485980E09 +++$+++ It was pretty much on top since it was displayed yesterday as DYK. I need to address the inote put out by user:blacksun, then we are done. I cant attend to it now.thanks. +++$+++ ::It was pretty much on top since it was displayed yesterday as DYK. I need to address the inote put out by user:blacksun, then we are done. I cant attend to it now.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
266070 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266068 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.166486220E09 +++$+++ Its the 6th from top on the archive list. not the FA archive list but \"Did you know\" archive list. +++$+++ ::Its the 6th from top on the archive list. not the FA archive list but "Did you know" archive list.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

3925 +++$+++ Elen of the Roads +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.312304340E09 +++$+++ Please see [http:\/\/www.sacred-texts.com\/cnote.htm sacred texts copyright disclaimer], virtually all of sacred texts is PD, and this source was last published in 1910. It is not considered good form to reproduce pd text wholesale, but that's not the same as it being a copyvio (and of course Wikipedia got started by importing the text of the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica). -- +++$+++ Please see [http://www.sacred-texts.com/cnote.htm sacred texts copyright disclaimer], virtually all of sacred texts is PD, and this source was last published in 1910. It is not considered good form to reproduce pd text wholesale, but that's not the same as it being a copyvio (and of course Wikipedia got started by importing the text of the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica). --[[User:Elen of the Roads|Elen of the Roads]] ([[User talk:Elen of the Roads|talk]]) 09:59, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
3926 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3925 +++$+++ 3925 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312314840E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your comments. Looking for the copyright status of the source, I got as far as the footer text at the [http:\/\/www.sacred-texts.com\/ Sacred Texts home page], which says that some of the text is PD and some all rights reserved. I regret I didn\u2019t go one step further to the \u201cSite copyrights\u201d link there, which is the page you link to. Avicennasis pointed out at HD that that particular source was PD, and when I saw that, I withdrew the copyvio nomination. (I\u2019m allowed to do that, right?) Is there anything else I should do to right things? \u2014 +++$+++ :Thank you for your comments. Looking for the copyright status of the source, I got as far as the footer text at the [http://www.sacred-texts.com/ Sacred Texts home page], which says that some of the text is PD and some all rights reserved. I regret I didn’t go one step further to the “Site copyrights” link there, which is the page you link to. Avicennasis pointed out at HD that that particular source was PD, and when I saw that, I withdrew the copyvio nomination. (I’m allowed to do that, right?) Is there anything else I should do to right things? —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 12:54, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
3927 +++$+++ Elen of the Roads +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3925 +++$+++ 3926 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.312320900E09 +++$+++ No, you're fine, thanks for withdrawing.  I happen to use sacred texts, so I know its copyright policies. The proposed article was a bit problematic anyway. -- +++$+++ ::No, you're fine, thanks for withdrawing.  I happen to use sacred texts, so I know its copyright policies. The proposed article was a bit problematic anyway. --[[User:Elen of the Roads|Elen of the Roads]] ([[User talk:Elen of the Roads|talk]]) 14:35, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

568633 +++$+++ Zhanster +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-04 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.154721480E09 +++$+++ Hi, can you please do me a favour and delete my account?  +++$+++ Hi, can you please do me a favour and delete my account? [[User:Zhanster|Zhanster]] 12:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
568634 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568633 +++$+++ 568633 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.154721660E09 +++$+++ Please read [[WP:USERNAME#Deleting_your_user_account]] for details of this process.  It isn't as easy as getting an admin to delete your pages. Regards, <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Please read [[WP:USERNAME#Deleting_your_user_account]] for details of this process.  It isn't as easy as getting an admin to delete your pages. Regards, <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 13:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

3928 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.312359240E09 +++$+++ You asked recently at MCQ for a \u201cfoundation statement \u2026 to justify that fair use images can't be used in news stories\u201d; since you may still be hibernating when my reply is there is archived, let me reply also here: Although it is not exactly true that fair use images may ''never'' be used in news stories, undoubtedly what you are looking for is [[wmf:Resolution:Licensing policy]], which says that if a Wikimedia project allows any non-free content at all, it may be used only in accord with an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) and that an \u201cEDP may not allow material where we can reasonably expect someone to upload a freely licensed file for the same purpose, such as is the case for almost all portraits of living notable individuals\u201d. The EDP for English Wikipedia is [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria]]. \u2014 +++$+++ You asked recently at MCQ for a “foundation statement … to justify that fair use images can't be used in news stories”; since you may still be hibernating when my reply is there is archived, let me reply also here: Although it is not exactly true that fair use images may ''never'' be used in news stories, undoubtedly what you are looking for is [[wmf:Resolution:Licensing policy]], which says that if a Wikimedia project allows any non-free content at all, it may be used only in accord with an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) and that an “EDP may not allow material where we can reasonably expect someone to upload a freely licensed file for the same purpose, such as is the case for almost all portraits of living notable individuals”. The EDP for English Wikipedia is [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria]]. —[[User:TEB728|teb728]] [[User talk:TEB728|t]] [[Special:Contributions/TEB728|c]] 01:14, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
3929 +++$+++ Alecmconroy +++$+++ TEB728 +++$+++ 3928 +++$+++ 3928 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.312396680E09 +++$+++ IF this is the only wiki you edit, then I probably sound crazy.  But I edit lots, and none are as hostile as EnWP.   -- +++$+++ :IF this is the only wiki you edit, then I probably sound crazy.  But I edit lots, and none are as hostile as EnWP.   --[[User:Alecmconroy|Alecmconroy]] ([[User talk:Alecmconroy|talk]]) 11:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

266073 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266073 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-18 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.166508480E09 +++$+++ point about some pictures being dark. There is a history behind it. These pictures of mine that look dark are all from inside the temple. The dancer and dozens of other ''madanikas'' are placed at the pillar bracket to the ceiling. The darkness of sculptures \"inside\" a temple is a part of Hindu iconography itself adding mysticism and a unique experience one can feel only when you visit these temples. I have visited over 15 of the best Hoysala temples in South Karnataka and this is common. Whenever the sculptor wanted to be discreet about a sculpture, eg: erotics, he would place it in niche where there is not much light entry and one needs to focus and move closer if possible to see it. Hoysala sculptors were masters in the knowledge of effect of light and shade and even darkness on sculptural works. When the inside of the temple is lit (preferably with old fashioned lighting like oil lamps etc) one really experiences the beauty of these sculptures. I also have such ''madanikas'' from outside the temple and I can replace the existing one.thanks. +++$+++ point about some pictures being dark. There is a history behind it. These pictures of mine that look dark are all from inside the temple. The dancer and dozens of other ''madanikas'' are placed at the pillar bracket to the ceiling. The darkness of sculptures "inside" a temple is a part of Hindu iconography itself adding mysticism and a unique experience one can feel only when you visit these temples. I have visited over 15 of the best Hoysala temples in South Karnataka and this is common. Whenever the sculptor wanted to be discreet about a sculpture, eg: erotics, he would place it in niche where there is not much light entry and one needs to focus and move closer if possible to see it. Hoysala sculptors were masters in the knowledge of effect of light and shade and even darkness on sculptural works. When the inside of the temple is lit (preferably with old fashioned lighting like oil lamps etc) one really experiences the beauty of these sculptures. I also have such ''madanikas'' from outside the temple and I can replace the existing one.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
266074 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266073 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.166508660E09 +++$+++ BTW, each one of these madanikas is about 3-4 feet tall. +++$+++ ::BTW, each one of these madanikas is about 3-4 feet tall.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
266075 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266073 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.166509440E09 +++$+++ I see you created a page for Dambal. This was on my list for mid next year. Dambal is famous for the Dodda Basappa temple with star shaped shrine built by western Chalukyas. I plan to visit this place and Lakkundi, Lakmeshwar etc next year.thanks. +++$+++ ::I see you created a page for Dambal. This was on my list for mid next year. Dambal is famous for the Dodda Basappa temple with star shaped shrine built by western Chalukyas. I plan to visit this place and Lakkundi, Lakmeshwar etc next year.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
266076 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266073 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.166517660E09 +++$+++ The dancer picture actually is the natural colour of the stone and conveys the \"female beauty part\" that's explained in the section , I think. I looked at some other pictures I have and they are more or less equally illuminated. Also, does the current vimana picture in architecture section look better or the one at bottom of  [[Chennakesava Temple at Somanathapura]] where the entire vimana is shown.thanks. +++$+++ ::The dancer picture actually is the natural colour of the stone and conveys the "female beauty part" that's explained in the section , I think. I looked at some other pictures I have and they are more or less equally illuminated. Also, does the current vimana picture in architecture section look better or the one at bottom of  [[Chennakesava Temple at Somanathapura]] where the entire vimana is shown.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

528220 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-27 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.193528760E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure exactly why you were deleting so many of these images, but I just had to go back and restore about 20 (?) of them.  One such image is [[:Image:Safavid Dynasty, Horse and Groom, by Haydar Ali, early 16th century.jpg]]; many more can be seen in the painting gallery at the [[Islamic art]] article.  None of them had tags for deletion, as far as I can see in the history, and all of them were marked with a source (maybe not the best one, but with a quick search of the museum's collections I could locate the piece).  You never notified the uploader (nor did anyone else), and a ton of fantastic images, all dated about 1400-1600 AD (so obviously public domain) were deleted.  Please be more careful next time before deleting images where the uploader (or any other user) could so easily fix the problem, and the image has never been tagged, and the uploader has never been notified.  +++$+++ I'm not sure exactly why you were deleting so many of these images, but I just had to go back and restore about 20 (?) of them.  One such image is [[:Image:Safavid Dynasty, Horse and Groom, by Haydar Ali, early 16th century.jpg]]; many more can be seen in the painting gallery at the [[Islamic art]] article.  None of them had tags for deletion, as far as I can see in the history, and all of them were marked with a source (maybe not the best one, but with a quick search of the museum's collections I could locate the piece).  You never notified the uploader (nor did anyone else), and a ton of fantastic images, all dated about 1400-1600 AD (so obviously public domain) were deleted.  Please be more careful next time before deleting images where the uploader (or any other user) could so easily fix the problem, and the image has never been tagged, and the uploader has never been notified. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 16:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
528221 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528220 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-28 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.193622240E09 +++$+++ Unless I'm missing something in the restored history, there were no tags.  I agree that it is not your job to notify, but when there were no tags as far as I can see, I'm not sure why they were deleted.  +++$+++ ::Unless I'm missing something in the restored history, there were no tags.  I agree that it is not your job to notify, but when there were no tags as far as I can see, I'm not sure why they were deleted. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 18:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

266077 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-19 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.166533680E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've finished grading for the semester, so perhaps I will have a bit of time.  Good night.  -- +++$+++ Hi, I've finished grading for the semester, so perhaps I will have a bit of time.  Good night.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 05:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
266078 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266077 +++$+++ 266077 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.166534400E09 +++$+++ I'm not aware of my world view shifting.  Did you have something in particular in mind?  -- +++$+++ :I'm not aware of my world view shifting.  Did you have something in particular in mind?  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 05:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
266079 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266077 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.166537880E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I am just musing, and will soon take some rest.  your friend -- +++$+++ :::Anyway, I am just musing, and will soon take some rest.  your friend --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 06:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
266080 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266077 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.166571060E09 +++$+++ You wrote: \"::::I am troubled by this new turn of events. You are not?\"  Are you referring to the ArbCom case? or did something happen more recently?  I must confess that I am somewhat fatalistic about Wikipedia.  What happens here is largely beyond my control.  I can do what I think is right, but if the fruit of my work is washed away by the tide, that is not so different from real life.  Is there something about which you are concerned more specically?  -- +++$+++ ::::You wrote: "::::I am troubled by this new turn of events. You are not?"  Are you referring to the ArbCom case? or did something happen more recently?  I must confess that I am somewhat fatalistic about Wikipedia.  What happens here is largely beyond my control.  I can do what I think is right, but if the fruit of my work is washed away by the tide, that is not so different from real life.  Is there something about which you are concerned more specically?  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 15:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
266081 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266077 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.166572140E09 +++$+++ Ah, COI.  I was surprised to learn that of that as well.  Yes, I suppose it contributes to muddying the waters.  But as I said, I can do my part, but I don't have control over how events play out here.  In defenses of the two editors that Ekajati has accused, the number of links is very small, and the commercial aspect of their site hardly compares with that of rosencomet's site.    Of course it is possible that these editors are intending to use the site as a springboard to their own advancement.  But it is equally possible that the idea of selling a paper version of the faq (and donating the procedes) was entirely unmotived by the thought of self-promotion.  -- +++$+++ :::::Ah, COI.  I was surprised to learn that of that as well.  Yes, I suppose it contributes to muddying the waters.  But as I said, I can do my part, but I don't have control over how events play out here.  In defenses of the two editors that Ekajati has accused, the number of links is very small, and the commercial aspect of their site hardly compares with that of rosencomet's site.    Of course it is possible that these editors are intending to use the site as a springboard to their own advancement.  But it is equally possible that the idea of selling a paper version of the faq (and donating the procedes) was entirely unmotived by the thought of self-promotion.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 15:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

3934 +++$+++ Rosiestep +++$+++ Verne Equinox +++$+++ 3934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-22 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.295706600E09 +++$+++ Hello.  Thank you for reviewing this article at DYK.  As you didn't put a green checkmark next to your comment, I'm not sure if it is good to go, or if there's something else it needs?  Cheers, -- +++$+++ Hello.  Thank you for reviewing this article at DYK.  As you didn't put a green checkmark next to your comment, I'm not sure if it is good to go, or if there's something else it needs?  Cheers, --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 06:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
3935 +++$+++ Rosiestep +++$+++ Verne Equinox +++$+++ 3934 +++$+++ 3934 +++$+++ 2011-01-23 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.295834700E09 +++$+++ Thanks again; and no worries. -- +++$+++ *Thanks again; and no worries. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 18:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

528223 +++$+++ DoubleBlue +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-26 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.193461560E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:DoubleBlue|<font color="darkblue">'''Double'''</font><font color="blue">Blue</font>]] ([[User talk:DoubleBlue|Talk)]] 22:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
528224 +++$+++ DoubleBlue +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528223 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-28 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.193613720E09 +++$+++ Prove it. I believe you seriously overstepped the bounds of CSD. These articles could have even passed AfD.  +++$+++ ::Prove it. I believe you seriously overstepped the bounds of CSD. These articles could have even passed AfD. [[User:DoubleBlue|<font color="darkblue">'''Double'''</font><font color="blue">Blue</font>]] ([[User talk:DoubleBlue|Talk)]] 16:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
528225 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528223 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-28 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.193622540E09 +++$+++ I just restored this article--I don't see this as blatant advertising in the least.  This is a matter for AfD, not speedy deletion.  +++$+++ :::I just restored this article--I don't see this as blatant advertising in the least.  This is a matter for AfD, not speedy deletion. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 18:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
528226 +++$+++ DoubleBlue +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528223 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-28 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.193625000E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I would also like [[Kin Canada]], [[Kin Canada Bursaries]], and [[Telemiracle]] restored. It would be a trivial matter for me to re-write them from a google cache but prefer that the author-credit histories were intact.  +++$+++ ::::Thank you. I would also like [[Kin Canada]], [[Kin Canada Bursaries]], and [[Telemiracle]] restored. It would be a trivial matter for me to re-write them from a google cache but prefer that the author-credit histories were intact. [[User:DoubleBlue|<font color="darkblue">'''Double'''</font><font color="blue">Blue</font>]] ([[User talk:DoubleBlue|Talk)]] 19:30, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

3936 +++$+++ PM800 +++$+++ Verne Equinox +++$+++ 3936 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-24 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.295865720E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Penny & The Quarters (Band)]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Penny & The Quarters (Band)|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Penny & The Quarters (Band)]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Penny & The Quarters (Band)|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:PM800|PM800]] ([[User talk:PM800|talk]]) 02:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
3937 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Verne Equinox +++$+++ 3936 +++$+++ 3936 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.296079680E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing![[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  14:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

266082 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-20 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.166615940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your message.  Let me think about the issues you raise.  I will look for more sources.  Thanks!   +++$+++ Thanks for your message.  Let me think about the issues you raise.  I will look for more sources.  Thanks!  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 03:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
266083 +++$+++ Nemonoman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266082 +++$+++ 266082 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.166616180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for all your good work on rock-cut architecture. Us non-architects really appreciate the effort!! -- +++$+++ :Thanks for all your good work on rock-cut architecture. Us non-architects really appreciate the effort!! --[[User:Nemonoman|Nemonoman]] 04:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
266084 +++$+++ Nemonoman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266082 +++$+++ 266082 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.166626560E09 +++$+++ If you haven't seen Ellora, by all means buy a ticket to India TODAY. You will not be disappointed. -- +++$+++ :If you haven't seen Ellora, by all means buy a ticket to India TODAY. You will not be disappointed. --[[User:Nemonoman|Nemonoman]] 06:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

3939 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ Verne Equinox +++$+++ 3939 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-11 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.299869580E09 +++$+++ I just created a stub about English novelist and explorer [[Rosita Forbes]], and watching the links to the stub I noticed that you write that you create this article. Where is it? Was it deleted? Thanks,  +++$+++ I just created a stub about English novelist and explorer [[Rosita Forbes]], and watching the links to the stub I noticed that you write that you create this article. Where is it? Was it deleted? Thanks, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 10:53, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
3940 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ Verne Equinox +++$+++ 3939 +++$+++ 3939 +++$+++ 2011-03-12 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.299966060E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Actually I did not know anything about her, but I am working on [[Kufra]], and I discovered that she has been the first European woman to visit the oasis, in 1920...I was curious, so I searched on Wikipedia and, incredibly, there was nothing about her... :-) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks! Actually I did not know anything about her, but I am working on [[Kufra]], and I discovered that she has been the first European woman to visit the oasis, in 1920...I was curious, so I searched on Wikipedia and, incredibly, there was nothing about her... :-) Cheers, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 13:41, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

3941 +++$+++ Yoninah +++$+++ Verne Equinox +++$+++ 3941 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-15 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.300249440E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Leslie R. Fairn]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Leslie R. Fairn|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Leslie R. Fairn]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Leslie R. Fairn|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:24, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
3942 +++$+++ Yoninah +++$+++ Verne Equinox +++$+++ 3941 +++$+++ 3941 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.300292880E09 +++$+++ Please see new note on DYK talk page.  +++$+++ :Please see new note on DYK talk page. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 09:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

524945 +++$+++ Kd4ttc +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524945 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-11 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.137047640E09 +++$+++ Please consider putting the notification on your user page that you are a phycian.  If uncomfortable with that, qualify that you are a student.  As another physician you should expect to get feedback appropriate to a higher level of sophistication you deserve in comments from other medical professionals.  Definately get yourself signed up in the doctor's mess through JFW's user pages.  Steve  +++$+++ Please consider putting the notification on your user page that you are a phycian.  If uncomfortable with that, qualify that you are a student.  As another physician you should expect to get feedback appropriate to a higher level of sophistication you deserve in comments from other medical professionals.  Definately get yourself signed up in the doctor's mess through JFW's user pages.  Steve [[User:Kd4ttc|Kd4ttc]] 22:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
524946 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524945 +++$+++ 524945 +++$+++ 2006-01-13 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.137221100E09 +++$+++ [[IANAD]] -- +++$+++ : [[IANAD]] --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

3945 +++$+++ Letterofmarque +++$+++ Verne Equinox +++$+++ 3945 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-02 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.301799900E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for adding the image to the [[Digby Gut]] article. It works perfectly to illustrate the channel from the Basin side and as a photograph I love the rich greens in the foreground.  +++$+++ Thank you very much for adding the image to the [[Digby Gut]] article. It works perfectly to illustrate the channel from the Basin side and as a photograph I love the rich greens in the foreground. [[User:Letterofmarque|Letterofmarque]] ([[User talk:Letterofmarque|talk]]) 20:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
3946 +++$+++ Verne Equinox +++$+++ Verne Equinox +++$+++ 3945 +++$+++ 3945 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.301806800E09 +++$+++ No problem. I took the picture while I was preparing an article on [[Bear River (Nova Scotia)|Bear River]]. You will notice the overly bright pictures in that article, taken the same day as the one of Digby Gut. It was all a function on the camera setting, I'm afraid.  +++$+++ : No problem. I took the picture while I was preparing an article on [[Bear River (Nova Scotia)|Bear River]]. You will notice the overly bright pictures in that article, taken the same day as the one of Digby Gut. It was all a function on the camera setting, I'm afraid. [[User:Verne Equinox|Verne Equinox]] ([[User talk:Verne Equinox#top|talk]]) 22:00, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

528234 +++$+++ Crockspot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.193801880E09 +++$+++ What was the problem with this image? I am the one who wrote the fair use rationale recently, but was not notified. This image copyright is owned by a Canadian municipality, which ultimately is owned by the Canadian Crown, and the fair use was valid. Please restore it, and let me know what the problem is so I can fix it. There should not be any problem with this image being fair use, as there are no free images of this Canadian politician available. -  +++$+++ What was the problem with this image? I am the one who wrote the fair use rationale recently, but was not notified. This image copyright is owned by a Canadian municipality, which ultimately is owned by the Canadian Crown, and the fair use was valid. Please restore it, and let me know what the problem is so I can fix it. There should not be any problem with this image being fair use, as there are no free images of this Canadian politician available. - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 20:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
528235 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528234 +++$+++ 528234 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.193802480E09 +++$+++ This image cannot be fixed with a better fair use rationale.  Crown copyright images are considered nonfree, and as a matter of policy all photos of living people are considered to be replaceable.  You can try requesting a free image from the mayor's office - see [[WP:COPYREQ]].  +++$+++ : This image cannot be fixed with a better fair use rationale.  Crown copyright images are considered nonfree, and as a matter of policy all photos of living people are considered to be replaceable.  You can try requesting a free image from the mayor's office - see [[WP:COPYREQ]]. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 20:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
528236 +++$+++ Crockspot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528234 +++$+++ 528235 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.193803620E09 +++$+++ I was using the \"Canadian politician\" template (can't tell you which one exactly, because the edit history is gone) which seemed to spell out exactly the situation this image was being used for. Is that template no longer stating a valid fair use rationale? If not, the template should be deleted as well. - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 20:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC) PS, it was just weeks ago that another admin tagged this image for deletion. I worked with them extensively, and satisfied them that there was a proper fair use rationale. I also had to track down the original uploader on another website, since he has not been active on Wikipedia for some time. Please point out the specific policy page where it is spelled out that this image has an improper fair use rationale. All I can find on deleting non-free images of living people are several essays, which do not hold any weight in policy. Also, since the uploader of the image is no longer active, and I was obviously actively editing the image page, it would have been nice to have been notified of the tagging of the image for deletion. -  +++$+++ :: I was using the "Canadian politician" template (can't tell you which one exactly, because the edit history is gone) which seemed to spell out exactly the situation this image was being used for. Is that template no longer stating a valid fair use rationale? If not, the template should be deleted as well. - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 20:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC) PS, it was just weeks ago that another admin tagged this image for deletion. I worked with them extensively, and satisfied them that there was a proper fair use rationale. I also had to track down the original uploader on another website, since he has not been active on Wikipedia for some time. Please point out the specific policy page where it is spelled out that this image has an improper fair use rationale. All I can find on deleting non-free images of living people are several essays, which do not hold any weight in policy. Also, since the uploader of the image is no longer active, and I was obviously actively editing the image page, it would have been nice to have been notified of the tagging of the image for deletion. - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 21:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
528237 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528234 +++$+++ 528236 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.193807880E09 +++$+++ [[WP:NONFREE]], under \"Unacceptable images\", says, \"Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image.\"  {{tl|Canada-politician-photo}} explicitly says it needs to be used alongside a non-free use rationale, because it is a non-free image tag.  The template is kept because the image is not ENTIRELY nonfree--noncommercial reuse is permitted, and it is helpful to specify this for downstream users--but it is a non-free image nonetheless by Wikipedia standards because it cannot be modified\/used for commercial purposes.   +++$+++ :::[[WP:NONFREE]], under "Unacceptable images", says, "Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image."  {{tl|Canada-politician-photo}} explicitly says it needs to be used alongside a non-free use rationale, because it is a non-free image tag.  The template is kept because the image is not ENTIRELY nonfree--noncommercial reuse is permitted, and it is helpful to specify this for downstream users--but it is a non-free image nonetheless by Wikipedia standards because it cannot be modified/used for commercial purposes.  [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 22:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
528238 +++$+++ Crockspot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528234 +++$+++ 528237 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.193816820E09 +++$+++ As best as I remember, it met all ten criteria in [[WP:NONFREE]]. I may not have spelled it out on each of the ten points, but I can certainly do so. -  +++$+++ ::::As best as I remember, it met all ten criteria in [[WP:NONFREE]]. I may not have spelled it out on each of the ten points, but I can certainly do so. - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 00:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
528239 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528234 +++$+++ 528238 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.193818080E09 +++$+++ One of the criteria is that it not be replaceable.  Because he is a living person, this is a replaceable photo.  +++$+++ :::::One of the criteria is that it not be replaceable.  Because he is a living person, this is a replaceable photo. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 01:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
528240 +++$+++ Crockspot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528234 +++$+++ 528239 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.193823060E09 +++$+++ So what you are saying is that it is not possible to have a fair use rationale on a photograph of a living person, period, right? Is this a firm and widely accepted interpretation of the policy, and do we expect to be able to enforce this policy wikipedia-wide? Why do we even bother tagging them for 48 hours? What could possibly happen in that 48 hours, short of the person no longer continuing to live, that would abort the deletion? Why have an unnecessary step in the process? - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 02:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC) PS. What makes the photograph of three living persons in the section above this one restorable? I'm sorry if I'm being a pain, but the fair use rules have always been somewhat confusing to me, and what you are telling me is only confusing me more. -  +++$+++ ::::::So what you are saying is that it is not possible to have a fair use rationale on a photograph of a living person, period, right? Is this a firm and widely accepted interpretation of the policy, and do we expect to be able to enforce this policy wikipedia-wide? Why do we even bother tagging them for 48 hours? What could possibly happen in that 48 hours, short of the person no longer continuing to live, that would abort the deletion? Why have an unnecessary step in the process? - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 02:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC) PS. What makes the photograph of three living persons in the section above this one restorable? I'm sorry if I'm being a pain, but the fair use rules have always been somewhat confusing to me, and what you are telling me is only confusing me more. - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 02:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
528241 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528234 +++$+++ 528240 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.193824260E09 +++$+++ Yes, essentially.  This is a firmly and widely accepted interpretation-- it appears as a specific example on [[WP:NONFREE]]. I would eliminate the 48-hour period myself, and have actually proposed doing so--I guess maybe the theory is that within that period you can advance evidence that the person is a recluse, or that particular photo is necessary to show a career-defining moment, etc. The three people above are a borderline case, because there they are in character for a TV show, which appears on the page about the TV show.  They wouldn't appear in public all together, and certainly not dressed as their characters.  So I think that that one is not replaceable, to show what the TV show characters look like.  +++$+++ :::::::Yes, essentially.  This is a firmly and widely accepted interpretation-- it appears as a specific example on [[WP:NONFREE]]. I would eliminate the 48-hour period myself, and have actually proposed doing so--I guess maybe the theory is that within that period you can advance evidence that the person is a recluse, or that particular photo is necessary to show a career-defining moment, etc. The three people above are a borderline case, because there they are in character for a TV show, which appears on the page about the TV show.  They wouldn't appear in public all together, and certainly not dressed as their characters.  So I think that that one is not replaceable, to show what the TV show characters look like. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 02:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
528242 +++$+++ Crockspot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528234 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.193865660E09 +++$+++ OK, eventually I'll get the hang of all these image intricacies. Image policy is about the most convoluted and complicated of any topic I've run across on Wikipedia. -  +++$+++ :::::::::OK, eventually I'll get the hang of all these image intricacies. Image policy is about the most convoluted and complicated of any topic I've run across on Wikipedia. - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 14:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

266091 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-27 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.167210420E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  I moved the discussion of evidence to [[User talk:BostonMA\/Mattisse\/Evidence]].  One of your comments sounded to me as though you were not going to present evidence.  But then you added more diffs to my talk page -- so I assume you would like me to continue to review these.  Let me know if that's not the case.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  I moved the discussion of evidence to [[User talk:BostonMA/Mattisse/Evidence]].  One of your comments sounded to me as though you were not going to present evidence.  But then you added more diffs to my talk page -- so I assume you would like me to continue to review these.  Let me know if that's not the case.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 01:07, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
266092 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266091 +++$+++ 266091 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.167215040E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  Yes, I moved your comment to the evidence discussion page.  Originally 999 tagged [[User:Dattat]] as being a sock of [[User:Shravak]][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User%3ADattat&diff=73082153&oldid=73081855] Later [[User:Netsnipe]] tagged the account as being a sock of [[User:Mattisse]] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User%3ADattat&diff=73363685&oldid=73093135].  [[User:Shravak]] was only blocked for 12 hours and denied being a sockpuppet.  He\/she is still editting.  -- +++$+++ :Hi Mattisse.  Yes, I moved your comment to the evidence discussion page.  Originally 999 tagged [[User:Dattat]] as being a sock of [[User:Shravak]][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ADattat&diff=73082153&oldid=73081855] Later [[User:Netsnipe]] tagged the account as being a sock of [[User:Mattisse]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ADattat&diff=73363685&oldid=73093135].  [[User:Shravak]] was only blocked for 12 hours and denied being a sockpuppet.  He/she is still editting.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 02:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
266093 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266091 +++$+++ 266092 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.167216360E09 +++$+++ Responded on my talk page.  -- +++$+++ ::Responded on my talk page.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 02:46, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
266094 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266091 +++$+++ 266093 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.167217020E09 +++$+++ I will email you.  That is not a discussion that really belongs here.  It was probably inappropriate for me to share my opinion of James Brown as well.  Expect an email soon.  -- +++$+++ :::I will email you.  That is not a discussion that really belongs here.  It was probably inappropriate for me to share my opinion of James Brown as well.  Expect an email soon.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 02:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

266097 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-27 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.167217320E09 +++$+++ Answer:[[User:Dattat]]'s user page.  -- +++$+++ Answer:[[User:Dattat]]'s user page.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 03:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
266098 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266097 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.167219480E09 +++$+++ Look at your email.  It is not an improper question to ask, but it is perhaps not appropriate for Wikipedia.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Look at your email.  It is not an improper question to ask, but it is perhaps not appropriate for Wikipedia.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 03:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
266099 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266097 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.167282300E09 +++$+++ Yes, I've often noticed that behavior.  It's the sort of thing [[WP:POINT]] says not to do.  -- +++$+++ ::Yes, I've often noticed that behavior.  It's the sort of thing [[WP:POINT]] says not to do.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 21:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

266100 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-28 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.167362280E09 +++$+++ Sincerely,   +++$+++ Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 19:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
266101 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266100 +++$+++ 266100 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.167363120E09 +++$+++ I think Rosencomet received some bad advice and some bad examples, but  now seems to be trying to work with the community.  I don't see any benefit in keeping that fire going.  I am actually somewhat disappointed that focus contiues to revolve around rosencomet.  If there is a potential for continuing conflict, I think it comes more from the parties to the arbitration who previously advised Rosencomet.  As always, take my opinions with whatever salt required.  -- +++$+++ :I think Rosencomet received some bad advice and some bad examples, but  now seems to be trying to work with the community.  I don't see any benefit in keeping that fire going.  I am actually somewhat disappointed that focus contiues to revolve around rosencomet.  If there is a potential for continuing conflict, I think it comes more from the parties to the arbitration who previously advised Rosencomet.  As always, take my opinions with whatever salt required.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 19:32, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

3957 +++$+++ LBM +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3957 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-01 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.149148260E09 +++$+++ Hi there - please '''stop''' adding incorrect information to the Leo the Lion article please. It is considered vandalism. Please test using the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thanks -  +++$+++ Hi there - please '''stop''' adding incorrect information to the Leo the Lion article please. It is considered vandalism. Please test using the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thanks - [[User:LBM|LBM]] 00:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
3958 +++$+++ LBM +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3957 +++$+++ 3957 +++$+++ 2006-06-01 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.149149040E09 +++$+++ I have added the change to the article as per your comment on my talk page. However - I am pretty sure ''Raintree County'' used the current lion. It can't have used ''Tanner'', but more likely the fourth lion (the current lion is the fifth lion in use). Please see the images on the Leo the Lion page for details. -  +++$+++ : I have added the change to the article as per your comment on my talk page. However - I am pretty sure ''Raintree County'' used the current lion. It can't have used ''Tanner'', but more likely the fourth lion (the current lion is the fifth lion in use). Please see the images on the Leo the Lion page for details. - [[User:LBM|LBM]] 01:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

3962 +++$+++ Adambiswanger1 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.155258960E09 +++$+++ Hi--I noticed you added quite a bit of information to [[The Nutcracker]] article, so I figure you would be the most logical person to ask a question to.  I have a classical music CD collection on my computer, and I'm very anal about the titling of each track.  So, I was wondering how the play is broken down in terms of scenes?  The article itself says that there are about 15, but I'm not sure where the Apotheosis fits into the mix, and how I should organize scene 14, which is the Prince and the Sugar Plum Fairy, and consists of multiple sections.  Also, even though it is the beginning of the second act, is it still refered to as scene 10, and not Act 2 scene 1?  Is it even intended to be divided into scenes at all?  Thanks for your help,  +++$+++ Hi--I noticed you added quite a bit of information to [[The Nutcracker]] article, so I figure you would be the most logical person to ask a question to.  I have a classical music CD collection on my computer, and I'm very anal about the titling of each track.  So, I was wondering how the play is broken down in terms of scenes?  The article itself says that there are about 15, but I'm not sure where the Apotheosis fits into the mix, and how I should organize scene 14, which is the Prince and the Sugar Plum Fairy, and consists of multiple sections.  Also, even though it is the beginning of the second act, is it still refered to as scene 10, and not Act 2 scene 1?  Is it even intended to be divided into scenes at all?  Thanks for your help, [[User:Adambiswanger1|AdamBiswanger1]] 18:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
3963 +++$+++ Adambiswanger1 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3962 +++$+++ 3962 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.155352740E09 +++$+++ Thanks alot, and that does help.  The track listings on my CD are fairly arbitrary, but I think I'll be able to organize them properly now.  Thanks again,  +++$+++ :Thanks alot, and that does help.  The track listings on my CD are fairly arbitrary, but I think I'll be able to organize them properly now.  Thanks again, [[User:Adambiswanger1|AdamBiswanger1]] 20:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

266108 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266108 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-01 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.167650700E09 +++$+++ I wish you the same. Myself and a couple of guys will start the final push for peer review of [[Vijayanagar Empire]] in a couple of days. Feel free to jump in. Currently, I am cleaning up citations per wiki format etc and the copy edits have not started. Should be ready in a couple of days.thanks. +++$+++ I wish you the same. Myself and a couple of guys will start the final push for peer review of [[Vijayanagar Empire]] in a couple of days. Feel free to jump in. Currently, I am cleaning up citations per wiki format etc and the copy edits have not started. Should be ready in a couple of days.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
266109 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266108 +++$+++ 266108 +++$+++ 2007-01-01 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.167651840E09 +++$+++ Happy new year to you as well! :-D.  -- +++$+++ :Happy new year to you as well! :-D.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 03:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

266110 +++$+++ Ammar shaker +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266110 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.167726540E09 +++$+++ hello sir , thanks so much for having care upon the article [[AL-Balad, Jeddah]] :) , i never expected that someone from Cuba would be interested in such places someday :) thanks again and have a new new year :)  +++$+++ hello sir , thanks so much for having care upon the article [[AL-Balad, Jeddah]] :) , i never expected that someone from Cuba would be interested in such places someday :) thanks again and have a new new year :) [[User:Ammar shaker|Ammar]] 00:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
266111 +++$+++ Ammar shaker +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266110 +++$+++ 266110 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.167728280E09 +++$+++ more sources? i think the main article [[Jeddah]] contains enough information about that subject , i joint [[AL-Balad, Jeddah]] with the category \"Jeddah\" Only considering AL-Balad as the old part of the city , not a city it self :)  +++$+++ : more sources? i think the main article [[Jeddah]] contains enough information about that subject , i joint [[AL-Balad, Jeddah]] with the category "Jeddah" Only considering AL-Balad as the old part of the city , not a city it self :) [[User:Ammar shaker|Ammar]] 00:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

524949 +++$+++  +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ This should really be addressed to Arcadian (talk \u2022 contribs), who has modified the template to allow these functionalities. He may have more information on why the ECB-ESIS databank was chosed over Pubchem. JFW | T@lk 20:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ This should really be addressed to Arcadian (talk • contribs), who has modified the template to allow these functionalities. He may have more information on why the ECB-ESIS databank was chosed over Pubchem. JFW | T@lk 20:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
524950 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524949 +++$+++ 524949 +++$+++ 2006-01-13 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.137156120E09 +++$+++ Answered at [[Template_talk:Drugbox#Issue_with_link]]. -- +++$+++ :Answered at [[Template_talk:Drugbox#Issue_with_link]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 04:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

528256 +++$+++ Ssbohio +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.194431820E09 +++$+++ Initially surprised that no article on him existed, I was going to create a [[WP:STUB|stub]] article on Professor Akbar S. Ahmed.  However, I noticed that an article on this topic had been [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Akbar+S.+Ahmed previously deleted] per your handling of [[WP:OTRS|OTRS]] request [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/otrs\/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=1069924 1069924].  The article I envisioned creating would have been a straightforward biography.  His name, position, published works, notable events & achievements.  I was prompted to create an article after noticing that Ahmed has been mentioned by name in several articles.  Please feel free to respond to me either on- or off-Wiki as to anything I should avoid in the article, or whether I should avoid its creation altogether. -- +++$+++ Initially surprised that no article on him existed, I was going to create a [[WP:STUB|stub]] article on Professor Akbar S. Ahmed.  However, I noticed that an article on this topic had been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Akbar+S.+Ahmed previously deleted] per your handling of [[WP:OTRS|OTRS]] request [https://secure.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=1069924 1069924].  The article I envisioned creating would have been a straightforward biography.  His name, position, published works, notable events & achievements.  I was prompted to create an article after noticing that Ahmed has been mentioned by name in several articles.  Please feel free to respond to me either on- or off-Wiki as to anything I should avoid in the article, or whether I should avoid its creation altogether. --[[User:Ssbohio|Ssbohio]] 02:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
528257 +++$+++ XDanielx +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528256 +++$+++ 528256 +++$+++ 2007-11-07 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.194438720E09 +++$+++ It's almost like I don't need to say things any more... AuburnPilot says them for me. \u2014 <span style=\"font:bold 11px Arial;display:inline;border:#000066 1px solid;background-color:#E6E6FA;padding:0 4px 0 4px;\"> +++$+++ :It's almost like I don't need to say things any more... AuburnPilot says them for me. — <span style="font:bold 11px Arial;display:inline;border:#000066 1px solid;background-color:#E6E6FA;padding:0 4px 0 4px;">[[User:XDanielx|xDanielx]]</span> <sup>[[User_talk:XDanielx|T]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/XDanielx|C]]</sub> 04:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
528258 +++$+++ AuburnPilot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528256 +++$+++ 528257 +++$+++ 2007-11-07 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.194440400E09 +++$+++ Further, this may not be a vote, but when only 4 out of 29 contributors support deletion (one of which supported deletion in order to peeve the \"frat boys and sorority sisters\"), there is no rationale for deletion. -  +++$+++ ::Further, this may not be a vote, but when only 4 out of 29 contributors support deletion (one of which supported deletion in order to peeve the "frat boys and sorority sisters"), there is no rationale for deletion. - [[User:AuburnPilot|<font color="#0000cd">auburn</font><font color="#EF6521">pilot</font>]] [[User_talk:AuburnPilot|<small>talk</small>]] 05:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

266113 +++$+++ Gay Cdn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.167808140E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. [[User:Gay Cdn|Gay Cdn]]  <small>[[User talk:Gay Cdn|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Gay Cdn|(Contr.)]]</small> 23:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
266114 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266113 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.167875760E09 +++$+++ Vijayanagara Empire: Dont mind others working on the article, I have full faith in you. The guys who have shown interest are also good at this stuff. Feel free.thanks. +++$+++ ::Vijayanagara Empire: Dont mind others working on the article, I have full faith in you. The guys who have shown interest are also good at this stuff. Feel free.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

88043 +++$+++ JakeInJoisey +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ 88043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.311732180E09 +++$+++ Wikidemon, I've instituted a process to, hopefully and credibly, NPOV resolve remnant [[Talk:Campaign for \"santorum\" neologism#Does the sourcing for \"vulgar\" rise to satisfy consideration under WP:V, WP:RS and WP:UNDUE as a legitimately supported \"fact about opinion\" for article inclusion?|hotbutton]] issues and would appreciate any consideration you might care to offer as a prior contributor to that discussion. Any credible resolution will require significant editor input and your observations would be appreciated.  Thanks for your consideration.  +++$+++ Wikidemon, I've instituted a process to, hopefully and credibly, NPOV resolve remnant [[Talk:Campaign for "santorum" neologism#Does the sourcing for "vulgar" rise to satisfy consideration under WP:V, WP:RS and WP:UNDUE as a legitimately supported "fact about opinion" for article inclusion?|hotbutton]] issues and would appreciate any consideration you might care to offer as a prior contributor to that discussion. Any credible resolution will require significant editor input and your observations would be appreciated.  Thanks for your consideration. [[User:JakeInJoisey|JakeInJoisey]] ([[User talk:JakeInJoisey|talk]]) 19:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
88044 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ 88043 +++$+++ 88043 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.311741360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the notice.  I'll take a look. -  +++$+++ :Thanks for the notice.  I'll take a look. - [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon#top|talk]]) 21:36, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

3973 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-19 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.177030380E09 +++$+++ How do you start a completely new article? (I am trying to figure out how to divide one article into two separate ones.)  +++$+++ How do you start a completely new article? (I am trying to figure out how to divide one article into two separate ones.) [[User:AlbertSM|AlbertSM]] 17:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
3974 +++$+++ DrGaellon +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3973 +++$+++ 3973 +++$+++ 2007-04-22 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.177238940E09 +++$+++ You can \"search\" for the new article; when WP tells you it doesn't exist, it will give you a link to create it. -- <span style=\"background-color: #bbbbff;\"> +++$+++ :You can "search" for the new article; when WP tells you it doesn't exist, it will give you a link to create it. -- <span style="background-color: #bbbbff;">[[User:DrGaellon|DrGaellon]] <span style="font-size: smaller;">([[User talk:DrGaellon|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/DrGaellon|contribs]])</span></span> 03:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

3975 +++$+++ DrGaellon +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3975 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-22 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.177238940E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your contributions to this article. Unfortunately, your edits made the synopsis far too long and unwieldy. I have reverted these edits as unnecessary and exceeding the depth of the article. [[WP:PLOT|Wikipedia is not a repository of extensive plot summaries.]] Additionally, while I have left your changes in the show history section alone, some of them should be sourced, as they are not readily verifiable (i.e., the comment about why the original production closed - I cannot locate a single source supporting your assertion that the show closed to allow the television production). Please provide references. -- <span style=\"background-color: #bbbbff;\"> +++$+++ Thank you for your contributions to this article. Unfortunately, your edits made the synopsis far too long and unwieldy. I have reverted these edits as unnecessary and exceeding the depth of the article. [[WP:PLOT|Wikipedia is not a repository of extensive plot summaries.]] Additionally, while I have left your changes in the show history section alone, some of them should be sourced, as they are not readily verifiable (i.e., the comment about why the original production closed - I cannot locate a single source supporting your assertion that the show closed to allow the television production). Please provide references. -- <span style="background-color: #bbbbff;">[[User:DrGaellon|DrGaellon]] <span style="font-size: smaller;">([[User talk:DrGaellon|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/DrGaellon|contribs]])</span></span> 03:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
3976 +++$+++ DrGaellon +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3975 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-23 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.177313160E09 +++$+++ -- <span style=\"background-color: #bbbbff;\"> +++$+++ :::-- <span style="background-color: #bbbbff;">[[User:DrGaellon|DrGaellon]] <span style="font-size: smaller;">([[User talk:DrGaellon|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/DrGaellon|contribs]])</span></span> 00:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

266121 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266121 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-05 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.167985740E09 +++$+++ \"Life in Vijayanagara\", \"Ancient city of Vijayanagara\" as is? May be you could just put together what you think is a good subheading list (and a good subarticle under subheading) like you did in your one of your previous messages. work has been rough today. thanks. +++$+++ "Life in Vijayanagara", "Ancient city of Vijayanagara" as is? May be you could just put together what you think is a good subheading list (and a good subarticle under subheading) like you did in your one of your previous messages. work has been rough today. thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:29, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
266122 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266121 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.167986700E09 +++$+++ I have removed the phrase \"classical and local\" for languages in LEAD section. Tamil and Sanskrit are today recognised as classical. Kannada and Telugu, although ancient are yet to receive this tag. May become controversial. Not your mistake.thanks. +++$+++ :: I have removed the phrase "classical and local" for languages in LEAD section. Tamil and Sanskrit are today recognised as classical. Kannada and Telugu, although ancient are yet to receive this tag. May become controversial. Not your mistake.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

528266 +++$+++ Derumi +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-12 07:17:00 +++$+++ 1.194880620E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the AfD notification. Is there a way for me to view the subject's request for deletion, or at least have a summary of why the subject wanted the article deleted? I'm curious because previous versions of the article was originally created by the subject himself before they were speedily deleted; I authored the current article as a first stab at creating a new article and because I deemed the subject notable (I like Count Duckula cartoons :). --<font color=\"#3333FF\">\u5065\u6b21<\/font>( +++$+++ Thank you for the AfD notification. Is there a way for me to view the subject's request for deletion, or at least have a summary of why the subject wanted the article deleted? I'm curious because previous versions of the article was originally created by the subject himself before they were speedily deleted; I authored the current article as a first stab at creating a new article and because I deemed the subject notable (I like Count Duckula cartoons :). --<font color="#3333FF">健次</font>([[User:Derumi|derumi]])<sup>[[User_talk:Derumi|talk]]</sup> 07:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
528267 +++$+++ Derumi +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528266 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.194881100E09 +++$+++ Interesting. I was under the impression that he was fine with my re-creating the article. Should I nominate it for speedy as the primary author? --<font color=\"#3333FF\">\u5065\u6b21<\/font>( +++$+++ ::Interesting. I was under the impression that he was fine with my re-creating the article. Should I nominate it for speedy as the primary author? --<font color="#3333FF">健次</font>([[User:Derumi|derumi]])<sup>[[User_talk:Derumi|talk]]</sup> 07:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

266125 +++$+++ Tunnels of Set +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266125 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-05 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.167994860E09 +++$+++ I noticed when looking at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Whatlinkshere\/User:Tunnels_of_Set pages that link to my user page] that you have me listed on two of your user subpages, [[User:Mattisse\/me6]] and [[User:Mattisse\/Working on\/See]]. Might I ask why? I would like to let you know that I find this creepy and it feels like you are [[WP:STALK|stalking]] me. Please desist.  +++$+++ I noticed when looking at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/User:Tunnels_of_Set pages that link to my user page] that you have me listed on two of your user subpages, [[User:Mattisse/me6]] and [[User:Mattisse/Working on/See]]. Might I ask why? I would like to let you know that I find this creepy and it feels like you are [[WP:STALK|stalking]] me. Please desist. [[User:Tunnels of Set|Tunnels of Set]] 03:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
266126 +++$+++ Tunnels of Set +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266125 +++$+++ 266125 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.168095720E09 +++$+++ Since you have been so rude as to ignore this query, I have removed myself from your \"shitlists\". Please do not attempt to stalk me again. If you do, I will have to bring your behavior to the attention of whatever powers-that-be here. I don't know who you are, Sir, but I dislike your behavior. As far as I know, I've not even edited any of the same articles that you do. What, precisely, is your problem?  +++$+++ :Since you have been so rude as to ignore this query, I have removed myself from your "shitlists". Please do not attempt to stalk me again. If you do, I will have to bring your behavior to the attention of whatever powers-that-be here. I don't know who you are, Sir, but I dislike your behavior. As far as I know, I've not even edited any of the same articles that you do. What, precisely, is your problem? [[User:Tunnels of Set|Tunnels of Set]] 07:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

608939 +++$+++ Jerem43 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 608939 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-05 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.233891900E09 +++$+++ Thanks -- +++$+++ Thanks --[[User:Jerem43|Jeremy]] (<small> [[User Talk:Jerem43|Blah blah...]]</small>) 19:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
608940 +++$+++ Jerem43 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 608939 +++$+++ 608939 +++$+++ 2009-02-05 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.233892920E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I missed that. It is back up but it should get some extra time for debate, even though it looks to be a delete. -- +++$+++ : Yeah, I missed that. It is back up but it should get some extra time for debate, even though it looks to be a delete. --[[User:Jerem43|Jeremy]] (<small> [[User Talk:Jerem43|Blah blah...]]</small>) 20:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

266129 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266129 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.168076460E09 +++$+++ tag while you are copyediting in large chunks. If a reader comes across the current partitioning, he may mistake it for vandalism and do something.thanks. +++$+++ tag while you are copyediting in large chunks. If a reader comes across the current partitioning, he may mistake it for vandalism and do something.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
266130 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266129 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.168081380E09 +++$+++ Hi. I dont understand the term \"[[survey article]]\". Unfortunately, India history related articles can be quite confusing, what with various terminologies etc. But there is only a limit to what one can clarify it before it becomes too basic. thanks. +++$+++ ::Hi. I dont understand the term "[[survey article]]". Unfortunately, India history related articles can be quite confusing, what with various terminologies etc. But there is only a limit to what one can clarify it before it becomes too basic. thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

528275 +++$+++ Ral315 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-29 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.196378820E09 +++$+++ Please respond on my talk page.  We've already gone to press for this week's issue, but responses will be added as they're submitted.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Please respond on my talk page.  We've already gone to press for this week's issue, but responses will be added as they're submitted.  Thanks, [[User:Ral315|Ral315]] [[User talk:Ral315|»]] 15:27, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
528276 +++$+++ Ral315 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528275 +++$+++ 528275 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.196435520E09 +++$+++ I forgot to note that I did see your note on your candidate statement -- if you'd rather not answer these questions, can you confirm that for me?   +++$+++ : I forgot to note that I did see your note on your candidate statement -- if you'd rather not answer these questions, can you confirm that for me?  [[User:Ral315|Ral315]] [[User talk:Ral315|»]] 07:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

3988 +++$+++ Eebahgum +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-13 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.197587340E09 +++$+++ I'm wondering if the Toscanini\/Horowitz Tchaikowsky Pno Conc 1 should be in the 'favourite recordings' list. Not, I presume, the studio version (78rpm) which was 'detestably recorded' according to Sackville-West and Shawe-Taylor, but the 'live' recording with NBCSO from the War Bonds Carnegie Hall concert of April 25 1943, which was (first, so far as I know) issued by RCA on LP in 1959 and is hot and favourite stuff. (Red Seal RB-16190). As this article is much-visited and edited I presume many decisions have already been taken about its content and just thought I'd ask you first before tweaking it. Best wishes,  +++$+++ I'm wondering if the Toscanini/Horowitz Tchaikowsky Pno Conc 1 should be in the 'favourite recordings' list. Not, I presume, the studio version (78rpm) which was 'detestably recorded' according to Sackville-West and Shawe-Taylor, but the 'live' recording with NBCSO from the War Bonds Carnegie Hall concert of April 25 1943, which was (first, so far as I know) issued by RCA on LP in 1959 and is hot and favourite stuff. (Red Seal RB-16190). As this article is much-visited and edited I presume many decisions have already been taken about its content and just thought I'd ask you first before tweaking it. Best wishes, [[User:Eebahgum|Eebahgum]] ([[User talk:Eebahgum|talk]]) 15:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
3989 +++$+++ Eebahgum +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3988 +++$+++ 3988 +++$+++ 2007-12-13 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.197616140E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I have amended accordingly. NB the WP article on Horowitz agrees with me that there was a studio recording in 1941 as well. Have you alternative info? Cheers,  +++$+++ : Thanks, I have amended accordingly. NB the WP article on Horowitz agrees with me that there was a studio recording in 1941 as well. Have you alternative info? Cheers, [[User:Eebahgum|Eebahgum]] ([[User talk:Eebahgum|talk]]) 23:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
3990 +++$+++ Eebahgum +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3988 +++$+++ 3988 +++$+++ 2007-12-14 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.197672720E09 +++$+++ Nor do I know, but according to the LP sleevenote it was an 'all Tchaikovsky' programme, and on the same occasion they auctioned Toscanini's manuscript of his orchestration of the Star Spangled Banner, and the whole event made 11 million dollars. Admission to the concert was by purchase of War Bonds only. The artists performed free. That's what the old sleevenote says.  +++$+++ :Nor do I know, but according to the LP sleevenote it was an 'all Tchaikovsky' programme, and on the same occasion they auctioned Toscanini's manuscript of his orchestration of the Star Spangled Banner, and the whole event made 11 million dollars. Admission to the concert was by purchase of War Bonds only. The artists performed free. That's what the old sleevenote says. [[User:Eebahgum|Eebahgum]] ([[User talk:Eebahgum|talk]]) 14:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

266134 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.168138620E09 +++$+++ But the other dashed portions can go I think. Also we can heavily condence what was the DECLINE portion. If you like to work on a subarticle, then what is now \"BACKGROUND\" can go into a new article called \"Capital of Vijayanagara Empire\". Some sections of \"life in Vijayanagara Empire\" and \"Ancient city of Vijayanagara Empire\" can also be fitted there to give a overall description of the capital city, its geography, legends and choice.thanks. +++$+++ But the other dashed portions can go I think. Also we can heavily condence what was the DECLINE portion. If you like to work on a subarticle, then what is now "BACKGROUND" can go into a new article called "Capital of Vijayanagara Empire". Some sections of "life in Vijayanagara Empire" and "Ancient city of Vijayanagara Empire" can also be fitted there to give a overall description of the capital city, its geography, legends and choice.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
266135 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266134 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.168142160E09 +++$+++ I am done with the literature section if you feel like copyediting it.thanks. +++$+++ :: I am done with the literature section if you feel like copyediting it.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
266136 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266134 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.168143360E09 +++$+++ I have done a first round of summarization of the lines you had dashed out, with the exception of the origin theories, which I shall look at tonight. Your skepticism often helps me understand a better world view, only I am also torn apart by the need to provide as much info as possible.thanks. +++$+++ :: I have done a first round of summarization of the lines you had dashed out, with the exception of the origin theories, which I shall look at tonight. Your skepticism often helps me understand a better world view, only I am also torn apart by the need to provide as much info as possible.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

266137 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.168145640E09 +++$+++ I meant it to mean that the most important contribution from Kannada poets and scholars was towards the Vaishnava Bhakti movement (the Haridasas being the poets) and the Brahminical literature and Virashiva literature. There are three topics here.thanks. +++$+++ I meant it to mean that the most important contribution from Kannada poets and scholars was towards the Vaishnava Bhakti movement (the Haridasas being the poets) and the Brahminical literature and Virashiva literature. There are three topics here.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
266138 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.168150320E09 +++$+++ Dasas are Devotees who wrote the poems. I will define Ragale for you. They are poems in blank verse. I shall add a citation for it.thanks. +++$+++ ::Dasas are Devotees who wrote the poems. I will define Ragale for you. They are poems in blank verse. I shall add a citation for it.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
266139 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.168150560E09 +++$+++ The portion you have striken out explains the most famous poets of the other two categories, Brahmin poets and Virashaiva poets. We need that, though it could be condensed.thanks +++$+++ ::The portion you have striken out explains the most famous poets of the other two categories, Brahmin poets and Virashaiva poets. We need that, though it could be condensed.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
266140 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.168151820E09 +++$+++ Its debated. You can re-word it.thanks. +++$+++ ::Its debated. You can re-word it.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
266141 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.168154040E09 +++$+++ I will be writing three sections \"social life\", \"Economy\" and \"Administration\" over the next couple of days. Once we are done with the copy edits or during final copy edits before FA review, I shall add definitions for all complicated words (like dasa (devotee)). Dont worry about this now. Also, the HISTORY section can be crunched down quite a bit to make it 70% of what it is right now. You can start on it. I shall follow your changes to make sure the meaning remains the same.thanks. +++$+++ :: I will be writing three sections "social life", "Economy" and "Administration" over the next couple of days. Once we are done with the copy edits or during final copy edits before FA review, I shall add definitions for all complicated words (like dasa (devotee)). Dont worry about this now. Also, the HISTORY section can be crunched down quite a bit to make it 70% of what it is right now. You can start on it. I shall follow your changes to make sure the meaning remains the same.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
266142 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.168154700E09 +++$+++ I will be out from 7PM (New York time) to 10PM and wont be able to answer your Questions.thanks. +++$+++ ::I will be out from 7PM (New York time) to 10PM and wont be able to answer your Questions.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
266143 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.168155000E09 +++$+++ I have full faith in you.thanks. +++$+++ ::I have full faith in you.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
266144 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.168168320E09 +++$+++ I have summarized HISTORY. I have tried to reduce usage of detailed names of feudatores like \"Reddys of Kondavidu\", \"Velamas of Rachakonda\", \"Chiefdom of Ummatur\" names that will only confuse a reader who is not aware of the south Indian territory. Instead I have tried to use terms like \"defeated feudatories in the eastern Deccan, Western Deccan etc which can be hyperlinked making it easy for the reader to grasp the content.The detailed pages of each king describes all this in detail anyway.thanks. +++$+++ ::I have summarized HISTORY. I have tried to reduce usage of detailed names of feudatores like "Reddys of Kondavidu", "Velamas of Rachakonda", "Chiefdom of Ummatur" names that will only confuse a reader who is not aware of the south Indian territory. Instead I have tried to use terms like "defeated feudatories in the eastern Deccan, Western Deccan etc which can be hyperlinked making it easy for the reader to grasp the content.The detailed pages of each king describes all this in detail anyway.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:12, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
266145 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.168221960E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I have deleted the sentences you felt were redundant. However I have reverted one edit you made where you linked Reddys of Kondavidu to [[Reddy dynasty]]. There is no such evidence the Sangama brothers were Reddys. The Sangama dynasty is the first Vijayanagar dynasty whose origins are debated. We have to be careful what we link to. There are lots of bogus articles running around without correct references and a lot of POV.thanks. +++$+++ ::Mattisse, I have deleted the sentences you felt were redundant. However I have reverted one edit you made where you linked Reddys of Kondavidu to [[Reddy dynasty]]. There is no such evidence the Sangama brothers were Reddys. The Sangama dynasty is the first Vijayanagar dynasty whose origins are debated. We have to be careful what we link to. There are lots of bogus articles running around without correct references and a lot of POV.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
266146 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.167184440E09 +++$+++ I wish you would find this out for me. I have tried everything. Further, there is a [[User:LiftWaffen]] that is called my sockpuppet but the template was applied by Hanuman Das. Recently an article called [[What Witches Do]] turned up that was created by LiftWaffen. [[User:Rosencomet]] and [[User:Ekajati]] discussed it but since they liked the article, they even created a Category for it (Wicca Books, I think). I need to know who exactly was an actual sockpuppet of mine. I am so surprised no one is concerned about real users who could be hurt by this, like Timmy12 and perhaps LiftWaffen. Sincerely,   +++$+++ :I wish you would find this out for me. I have tried everything. Further, there is a [[User:LiftWaffen]] that is called my sockpuppet but the template was applied by Hanuman Das. Recently an article called [[What Witches Do]] turned up that was created by LiftWaffen. [[User:Rosencomet]] and [[User:Ekajati]] discussed it but since they liked the article, they even created a Category for it (Wicca Books, I think). I need to know who exactly was an actual sockpuppet of mine. I am so surprised no one is concerned about real users who could be hurt by this, like Timmy12 and perhaps LiftWaffen. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 17:54, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
266147 +++$+++ Rosencomet +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ 266146 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.168221180E09 +++$+++ I just came across this. I don't know where you got the idea that I \"liked\" the article, or that I had anything to do with the creation of a category (something I have no idea how to do, and never discussed with Ekajati or anyone else). And what in the world does this sentence mean?: \"I need to know who exactly was an actual sockpuppet of mine.\"  +++$+++ :: I just came across this. I don't know where you got the idea that I "liked" the article, or that I had anything to do with the creation of a category (something I have no idea how to do, and never discussed with Ekajati or anyone else). And what in the world does this sentence mean?: "I need to know who exactly was an actual sockpuppet of mine." [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]] 17:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
266148 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ 266147 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.168234560E09 +++$+++ I do not like the demanding and  demeaning tone  of your message to me on my talk page above nor do I like your  chararcterization of [[User:Paul Pigman]] as making \"snippy accusations\". I have always been friendly and civil to you.  Please do not post on my talk page again. Thanks! Sincerely,   +++$+++ :::I do not like the demanding and  demeaning tone  of your message to me on my talk page above nor do I like your  chararcterization of [[User:Paul Pigman]] as making "snippy accusations". I have always been friendly and civil to you.  Please do not post on my talk page again. Thanks! Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 21:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
266149 +++$+++ Rosencomet +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ 266148 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.168306740E09 +++$+++ Fourth, as long as I see mischaracterizations of my actions like the one above, or the one when you accused me of creating and\/or linking the Musart article, I will comment. I have never done anything to you except react to your treatment of me; never harrassed you, never messed with articles you are a primary contributer to, never started a mediation or arbitration about you, never did anything but try to stop you from tag-bombing and chopping away at whatever I did, and rallying others to help you, and accusing me of things I didn't do, which you started doing within a week of my first edit.  +++$+++ ::::Fourth, as long as I see mischaracterizations of my actions like the one above, or the one when you accused me of creating and/or linking the Musart article, I will comment. I have never done anything to you except react to your treatment of me; never harrassed you, never messed with articles you are a primary contributer to, never started a mediation or arbitration about you, never did anything but try to stop you from tag-bombing and chopping away at whatever I did, and rallying others to help you, and accusing me of things I didn't do, which you started doing within a week of my first edit. [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]] 17:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
266150 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ 266149 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.168307100E09 +++$+++ I am asking you for the second time please to refrain from posting on my talk page, Rosencoment.  Sincerely,   +++$+++ :::::I am asking you for the second time please to refrain from posting on my talk page, Rosencoment.  Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 17:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
266151 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.168315860E09 +++$+++ I've mentioned something about LiftWaffen on the arbitration case. -- +++$+++ :I've mentioned something about LiftWaffen on the arbitration case. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 20:11, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
266152 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ 266151 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.168238700E09 +++$+++ Try focussing on \"Architecture\" section for now. This way we make progress on all sections instead of just the HISTORY section. I am now starting work on \"social life\". So you can copyedit this section next.thanks. +++$+++ ::Try focussing on "Architecture" section for now. This way we make progress on all sections instead of just the HISTORY section. I am now starting work on "social life". So you can copyedit this section next.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
266153 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ 266151 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.168239000E09 +++$+++ Architecture for now. Social life after a few hours.thanks. +++$+++ ::Architecture for now. Social life after a few hours.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
266154 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266137 +++$+++ 266151 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.168247760E09 +++$+++ I have put together the SOCIETY section. Large as it may seem, this gives us the opportunity to remove what is trivial and keep the rest. This is a vast topic and I have as such left out some other topics such as schools\/education etc.thanks. +++$+++ :: I have put together the SOCIETY section. Large as it may seem, this gives us the opportunity to remove what is trivial and keep the rest. This is a vast topic and I have as such left out some other topics such as schools/education etc.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

544715 +++$+++ Enz1 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544715 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-04 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.196758800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Enz1|Enz1]] 01:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
544716 +++$+++ Enz1 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544715 +++$+++ 544715 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.196759940E09 +++$+++ Ok, leave it as it is then. The problem is that the majority of people reading this define \"evidence\" as either experimental data or statistically significant relationships. This particular factoid is a supposition that remains irrelevant to proving the theory. I don't see how my initial argument is wrong, either.  +++$+++ :Ok, leave it as it is then. The problem is that the majority of people reading this define "evidence" as either experimental data or statistically significant relationships. This particular factoid is a supposition that remains irrelevant to proving the theory. I don't see how my initial argument is wrong, either. [[User:Enz1|Enz1]] 01:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

528283 +++$+++ The Fat Man Who Never Came Back +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-30 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.196465580E09 +++$+++ Would you object to my listing [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007\/Candidate statements\/^demon\/Questions for the candidate|this page]] on MfD, since you have clearly stated that you will not be taking questions?-- +++$+++ Would you object to my listing [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Candidate statements/^demon/Questions for the candidate|this page]] on MfD, since you have clearly stated that you will not be taking questions?--[[User:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back|The Fat Man Who Never Came Back]] 15:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
528284 +++$+++ The Fat Man Who Never Came Back +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528283 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-01 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.196503380E09 +++$+++ Not really, apparently. What is meant by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2007\/Candidate_statements\/%5Edemon\/Questions_for_the_candidate&action=edit this deletion summary]?.  Are you running or not?  You're still listed as an active candidate.-- +++$+++ ::Not really, apparently. What is meant by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2007/Candidate_statements/%5Edemon/Questions_for_the_candidate&action=edit this deletion summary]?.  Are you running or not?  You're still listed as an active candidate.--[[User:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back|The Fat Man Who Never Came Back]] 02:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

3997 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-12 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.210641240E09 +++$+++ Perhaps it wasn't, then. In any case, I do know that \"Amahl\" was broadcast in color on December 29, 1953 by NBC. +++$+++ Perhaps it wasn't, then. In any case, I do know that "Amahl" was broadcast in color on December 29, 1953 by NBC.[[User:AlbertSM|AlbertSM]] ([[User talk:AlbertSM#top|talk]]) 18:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
3998 +++$+++ Walloon +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 3997 +++$+++ 3997 +++$+++ 2008-05-12 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.210643820E09 +++$+++ No, it was broadcast by NBC on December 20, 1953. \u2014  +++$+++ :No, it was broadcast by NBC on December 20, 1953. — [[User:Walloon|Walloon]] ([[User talk:Walloon|talk]]) 18:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

4000 +++$+++ WikiDon +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-29 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.212044880E09 +++$+++ Hola! A reference or two would be super nice. ~  +++$+++ Hola! A reference or two would be super nice. ~ [[User:WikiDon|WikiDon]] ([[User talk:WikiDon|talk]]) 00:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
4001 +++$+++ WikiDon +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4000 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-29 06:17:00 +++$+++ 1.212067020E09 +++$+++ It is just a little more work upfront, but gives your work and Wikipedia a lot more credibility, and once you make it a habit, you'll get good at it.  +++$+++ ::It is just a little more work upfront, but gives your work and Wikipedia a lot more credibility, and once you make it a habit, you'll get good at it. [[User:WikiDon|WikiDon]] ([[User talk:WikiDon|talk]]) 06:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

4008 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4008 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-08 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.223511660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your edit to ''Carousel''.  Can you please add a citation to show where that information can be [[WP:V|verified]]?  Thanks!  --  +++$+++ Thanks for your edit to ''Carousel''.  Can you please add a citation to show where that information can be [[WP:V|verified]]?  Thanks!  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 17:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
4009 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4008 +++$+++ 4008 +++$+++ 2008-10-08 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.223527920E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  --  +++$+++ :Thanks!  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 21:52, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

524956 +++$+++ Ekko +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524956 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-22 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.137989340E09 +++$+++ You put in the wrong illustration at [[pulmonary vein]], it shows the aorta. I guess it will be better if you corrected your typo than me removing the box. -- +++$+++ You put in the wrong illustration at [[pulmonary vein]], it shows the aorta. I guess it will be better if you corrected your typo than me removing the box. --[[User:Ekko|Ekko]] 20:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
524957 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524956 +++$+++ 524956 +++$+++ 2006-01-23 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.138063980E09 +++$+++ Thank you for catching my error. I have identified and uploaded a more appropriate illustration from [[Gray's Anatomy]] (specifically, Gray504.png) and used it as a replacement. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for catching my error. I have identified and uploaded a more appropriate illustration from [[Gray's Anatomy]] (specifically, Gray504.png) and used it as a replacement. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 16:53, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

4010 +++$+++ Michael Bednarek +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4010 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-24 05:53:00 +++$+++ 1.227534780E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia{{#if:Christmas Oratorio|. Regarding your edit(s) to [[:Christmas Oratorio]]|. In the future}}, it is recommended that you use the [[Help:Show preview|preview]] button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up [[Special:Recentchanges|recent changes]] and the [[Wikipedia:page history|page history]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-preview -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia{{#if:Christmas Oratorio|. Regarding your edit(s) to [[:Christmas Oratorio]]|. In the future}}, it is recommended that you use the [[Help:Show preview|preview]] button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up [[Special:Recentchanges|recent changes]] and the [[Wikipedia:page history|page history]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-preview --> [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 05:53, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
4011 +++$+++ Melodia +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4010 +++$+++ 4010 +++$+++ 2008-12-11 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.229047500E09 +++$+++ Let me pipe in here to say, I agree. It's annoying to see six small edits on the same paragraph in a row.  +++$+++ :Let me pipe in here to say, I agree. It's annoying to see six small edits on the same paragraph in a row. [[User:Melodia|♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫]] ([[User talk:Melodia|talk]]) 18:05, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

266155 +++$+++ Paul_Pigman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266155 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-08 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.168313160E09 +++$+++ I think those are your options as I see them. There might be others I'm not aware of since I'm not thoroughly familiar with every option. (although I seem to be getting reluctantly more familiar as time passes. *sigh*) An informal option might also be to call an Admin you know personally in, just to look at the situation and give advice. I don't think an Admin brought in under these circumstances would take any \"official\" action but a warning from an Admin, if they think it's warranted, could be useful. -- +++$+++ I think those are your options as I see them. There might be others I'm not aware of since I'm not thoroughly familiar with every option. (although I seem to be getting reluctantly more familiar as time passes. *sigh*) An informal option might also be to call an Admin you know personally in, just to look at the situation and give advice. I don't think an Admin brought in under these circumstances would take any "official" action but a warning from an Admin, if they think it's warranted, could be useful. --[[User:Paul_Pigman|'''Pigman''']]<sup>[[User talk:Paul_Pigman|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Paul_Pigman|contribs]]</sup> 19:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
266156 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266155 +++$+++ 266155 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.168314840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for answering. I think just ignoring them is probably my best option, as I don't have the patience to read through the overly elaberate and labyrinthian arguments in them anyway. Thank you for your (now familiar to you) analysis of the options. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Thanks for answering. I think just ignoring them is probably my best option, as I don't have the patience to read through the overly elaberate and labyrinthian arguments in them anyway. Thank you for your (now familiar to you) analysis of the options. Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 19:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

4013 +++$+++ Thomprod +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-04 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.231107780E09 +++$+++ Can you please provide references for the changes you made to the cast members table?  I added the table but couldn't find references for all of the names, so your changes (if verifiable) help to improve the table.  Thanks. -- +++$+++ Can you please provide references for the changes you made to the cast members table?  I added the table but couldn't find references for all of the names, so your changes (if verifiable) help to improve the table.  Thanks. --[[User:Thomprod|Thomprod]] ([[User talk:Thomprod|talk]]) 14:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
4014 +++$+++ Thomprod +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4013 +++$+++ 4013 +++$+++ 2009-01-12 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.231819680E09 +++$+++ Thanks. -- +++$+++ :Thanks. --[[User:Thomprod|Thomprod]] ([[User talk:Thomprod|talk]]) 20:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

266158 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266158 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-09 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.168333140E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class=\"plainlinks\">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target={{PAGENAMEE}}&namespace=6}} this link]<\/span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]].  If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target={{PAGENAMEE}}&namespace=6}} this link]</span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]].  If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. [[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 00:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
266159 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.168337940E09 +++$+++ Ok you can take it out. I was a bit busy with kids etc. I shall spend tommorow and day after writing up on AMINISTRATION and then a couple of days for ECONOMY. In the mean time we can keep busy with subarticles which we can copy edit to first order. No need for detailed copy edit there I think. If you think we need citations anywhere, just tag it and let me know. I cut and paste the Background section into [[Ancient City of Vijayanagara]] and did a little copyedit there but the page needs citations which I did not put when I created the page. This page can be a DYK. I need to complete the ARCHITECTURE sub article with \"secular structures\" which can happen in the background even during FA review. Then we can do a quick look into [[Vijayanagara]], [[Hampi]] for general syntax\/construct.thanks. +++$+++ :: Ok you can take it out. I was a bit busy with kids etc. I shall spend tommorow and day after writing up on AMINISTRATION and then a couple of days for ECONOMY. In the mean time we can keep busy with subarticles which we can copy edit to first order. No need for detailed copy edit there I think. If you think we need citations anywhere, just tag it and let me know. I cut and paste the Background section into [[Ancient City of Vijayanagara]] and did a little copyedit there but the page needs citations which I did not put when I created the page. This page can be a DYK. I need to complete the ARCHITECTURE sub article with "secular structures" which can happen in the background even during FA review. Then we can do a quick look into [[Vijayanagara]], [[Hampi]] for general syntax/construct.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
266160 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.168382700E09 +++$+++ I have removed the [[Vijayanagara Metropolitan City]] as it is the same as [[Ancient City of Vijayanagara]]. When i created the former article, someone complained that the word \"Metropolitan\" is not correct. So instead of getting into arguements, I created a new page called by the later name. I believe the article [[ Vijayanagara Metropolitan City]] was to be deleted but is still hanging around. Do you know how to submit a page for deletion?thanks. +++$+++ ::I have removed the [[Vijayanagara Metropolitan City]] as it is the same as [[Ancient City of Vijayanagara]]. When i created the former article, someone complained that the word "Metropolitan" is not correct. So instead of getting into arguements, I created a new page called by the later name. I believe the article [[ Vijayanagara Metropolitan City]] was to be deleted but is still hanging around. Do you know how to submit a page for deletion?thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 14:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
266161 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.168384320E09 +++$+++ I will be writing up on administration today and partially tommorow and complete typing it in tommorow. So untill then, we should focus on the subarticles. Please go thru [[Ancient City of Vijayanagara]], [[Vijayanagara Architecture]] and do copy edits, tag for citations, make general suggestions to what you think I may have missed out generally speaking. The Economy section which will come later this week will be more exiting I believe from a copy edit point of view. There is so much to write there.thanks. +++$+++ ::I will be writing up on administration today and partially tommorow and complete typing it in tommorow. So untill then, we should focus on the subarticles. Please go thru [[Ancient City of Vijayanagara]], [[Vijayanagara Architecture]] and do copy edits, tag for citations, make general suggestions to what you think I may have missed out generally speaking. The Economy section which will come later this week will be more exiting I believe from a copy edit point of view. There is so much to write there.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
266162 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.168426500E09 +++$+++ I have aded some info on Governance. Whenever you have time for copyedit, feel free. I shall scratch around for more info tommorow.thanks. +++$+++ ::I have aded some info on Governance. Whenever you have time for copyedit, feel free. I shall scratch around for more info tommorow.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
266163 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.168467780E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I will take a look. sub articles like these are less prone to cpedit mistakes anyway. +++$+++ ::Thanks. I will take a look. sub articles like these are less prone to cpedit mistakes anyway.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 14:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
266164 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.168505820E09 +++$+++ Hi. sorry to say that your last three edits were lost during a revert. Someone was trying to remove cited information anon. Please watch out for these spurious edits while making yours. I am going to ask for an anon lock on this page. I shall try to reinstate your last three edits.thanks. +++$+++ ::Hi. sorry to say that your last three edits were lost during a revert. Someone was trying to remove cited information anon. Please watch out for these spurious edits while making yours. I am going to ask for an anon lock on this page. I shall try to reinstate your last three edits.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
266165 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.168507200E09 +++$+++ Oh! sorry, the main article, Vijayanagara Empire. I have added another paragraph for \"Governance\".thanks. +++$+++ ::Oh! sorry, the main article, Vijayanagara Empire. I have added another paragraph for "Governance".thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

4015 +++$+++ Thomprod +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-09 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.231558860E09 +++$+++ You recently edited [[Cinderella (musical)]] [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Cinderella_(musical)&curid=1303197&diff=262997572&oldid=262587298|here]] without an edit summary again.  Providing an edit summary helps others to track the changes to an article more efficiently.  Also, while I personally agree with the opinion you added, it is probably not consistant with [[WP:NPOV]]. -- +++$+++ You recently edited [[Cinderella (musical)]] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cinderella_(musical)&curid=1303197&diff=262997572&oldid=262587298|here]] without an edit summary again.  Providing an edit summary helps others to track the changes to an article more efficiently.  Also, while I personally agree with the opinion you added, it is probably not consistant with [[WP:NPOV]]. --[[User:Thomprod|Thomprod]] ([[User talk:Thomprod|talk]]) 19:41, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
4016 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4015 +++$+++ 4015 +++$+++ 2009-01-09 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.231561800E09 +++$+++ The problem is that there is no reference to a source that characterizes the changes.  Are the changes more significant that the changes in the other versions?  In the part of the article that discusses the Brandy version, we say: \"The hit song \"Falling in Love With Love\", from the Rodgers and Hart musical ''The Boys from Syracuse'', was sung by Bernadette Peters as the Stepmother. \"The Sweetest Sounds\" from Rodgers' ''No Strings'', was also used, sung by Cinderella and the Prince. \"There's Music in You,\" written by Rodgers and Hammerstein for the 1953 film ''Main Street to Broadway'', was sung as the finale by Fairy Godmother Whitney Houston\".  Are these the changes that you refer to, or are there others?  Is there a review that characterizes the changes as major?  If so, we could cite it, and then the statement would be supported.  [[WP:V]] requires that we have cite to a published source that everone can see verifies the assertions made in our articles.  Thanks.  --  +++$+++ :The problem is that there is no reference to a source that characterizes the changes.  Are the changes more significant that the changes in the other versions?  In the part of the article that discusses the Brandy version, we say: "The hit song "Falling in Love With Love", from the Rodgers and Hart musical ''The Boys from Syracuse'', was sung by Bernadette Peters as the Stepmother. "The Sweetest Sounds" from Rodgers' ''No Strings'', was also used, sung by Cinderella and the Prince. "There's Music in You," written by Rodgers and Hammerstein for the 1953 film ''Main Street to Broadway'', was sung as the finale by Fairy Godmother Whitney Houston".  Are these the changes that you refer to, or are there others?  Is there a review that characterizes the changes as major?  If so, we could cite it, and then the statement would be supported.  [[WP:V]] requires that we have cite to a published source that everone can see verifies the assertions made in our articles.  Thanks.  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 20:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
4017 +++$+++ Thomprod +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4015 +++$+++ 4016 +++$+++ 2009-01-10 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.231632600E09 +++$+++ AlbertSM, you continue to make edits to the article without leaving an edit summary or references for your assertions.  I urge you to please read [[Help:Edit summary]] and [[WP:V]] and make future edits using these guidelines. If you need help, please contact [[User talk:Thomprod]].  Thanks. -- +++$+++ ::AlbertSM, you continue to make edits to the article without leaving an edit summary or references for your assertions.  I urge you to please read [[Help:Edit summary]] and [[WP:V]] and make future edits using these guidelines. If you need help, please contact [[User talk:Thomprod]].  Thanks. --[[User:Thomprod|Thomprod]] ([[User talk:Thomprod|talk]]) 16:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

528307 +++$+++ NoSeptember +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528307 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-10 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.200025440E09 +++$+++ This is one admin feature (now live for non-admins [[WP:ROLL]]) that should help you in your new goal of focusing on editing, so I restored it to your account. Cheers,  +++$+++ This is one admin feature (now live for non-admins [[WP:ROLL]]) that should help you in your new goal of focusing on editing, so I restored it to your account. Cheers, [[User:NoSeptember/Signature14|<font color = "green">'''NoSeptember'''</font>]] 20:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
528308 +++$+++ NoSeptember +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528307 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.200035940E09 +++$+++ Done. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Done. Cheers, [[User:NoSeptember/Signature14|<font color = "green">'''NoSeptember'''</font>]] 23:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

262814 +++$+++ 131.191.92.252 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262814 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-08 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.197174120E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/131.191.92.252|131.191.92.252]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/131.191.92.252|131.191.92.252]] ([[User talk:131.191.92.252|talk]]) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
262815 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262814 +++$+++ 262814 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.197272820E09 +++$+++ There was no [[Help:Edit summary|Edit summary]] for your edit, and I incorrectly assumed it was nonsense. I see now that this is an abbreviation for the Butalbital-Aspirin-Caffeine formulation, not the Butalbital-Acetaminophen-Caffeine formulation you had appended it to. As you say, this is a generic term, so it doesn't fit with a list of \"trade names\". I'm not inclined to pollute articles with all the permutations of abbreviations that may be in use. If you disagree, post a request at [[WT:PHARM]].  +++$+++ :There was no [[Help:Edit summary|Edit summary]] for your edit, and I incorrectly assumed it was nonsense. I see now that this is an abbreviation for the Butalbital-Aspirin-Caffeine formulation, not the Butalbital-Acetaminophen-Caffeine formulation you had appended it to. As you say, this is a generic term, so it doesn't fit with a list of "trade names". I'm not inclined to pollute articles with all the permutations of abbreviations that may be in use. If you disagree, post a request at [[WT:PHARM]]. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 23:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

266166 +++$+++ Vintermann +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266166 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.168537080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Vintermann|Vintermann]] 09:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
266167 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266166 +++$+++ 266166 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.168549500E09 +++$+++ My page being semi-protected just means that non-registered users cannot edit it, so that does not apply to you! Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :My page being semi-protected just means that non-registered users cannot edit it, so that does not apply to you! Sincerely, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 13:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
266168 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266166 +++$+++ 266167 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.168549860E09 +++$+++ Looking back in the article's history, I guess I was the one who put the tag on in August, 2006. Anyway, what I wrote above still applies. Wikipedia's policy is that \"verifiablity\" not \"truth\" is the criteria for referencing. This is because Wikipedia is an encyclodia. Read [[WP:NOT]] - what Wikipedia is not. Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Looking back in the article's history, I guess I was the one who put the tag on in August, 2006. Anyway, what I wrote above still applies. Wikipedia's policy is that "verifiablity" not "truth" is the criteria for referencing. This is because Wikipedia is an encyclodia. Read [[WP:NOT]] - what Wikipedia is not. Sincerely, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 13:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

266169 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.168569600E09 +++$+++ I will be starting work on \"ECONOMY\" section of Vijayanagara Empire today and completing it tommorow.thanks. +++$+++ I will be starting work on "ECONOMY" section of Vijayanagara Empire today and completing it tommorow.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
266170 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266169 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.168570320E09 +++$+++ I am planning to bring the [[Hoysala architecture]] page to peer review next. You may want to keep busy with that article for a while. As it is not about Kingdom stuff you have worked with me on so far, you may have more questions, though I have tried to explain all terminology as best as I can. There may be cases where I may not have, so you can point it out, apart from correcting the prose.thanks. +++$+++ ::I am planning to bring the [[Hoysala architecture]] page to peer review next. You may want to keep busy with that article for a while. As it is not about Kingdom stuff you have worked with me on so far, you may have more questions, though I have tried to explain all terminology as best as I can. There may be cases where I may not have, so you can point it out, apart from correcting the prose.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
266171 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266169 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.168575300E09 +++$+++ We will have to decide to use \"mandapa\" or \"mantapa\" consistently. Not sure which is acceptable from larger view point. Mantapa is a Kannada word, Mandapa is more north Indian. Or we could simply use Mantapa and dab link to Mandapa.thanks. +++$+++ ::We will have to decide to use "mandapa" or "mantapa" consistently. Not sure which is acceptable from larger view point. Mantapa is a Kannada word, Mandapa is more north Indian. Or we could simply use Mantapa and dab link to Mandapa.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

4026 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4026 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-05 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.238988900E09 +++$+++ My question is \"Why?\" I am doing all the citations correctly and this still appears often. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? +++$+++ My question is "Why?" I am doing all the citations correctly and this still appears often. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong?[[User:AlbertSM|AlbertSM]] ([[User talk:AlbertSM#top|talk]]) 20:35, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
4027 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4026 +++$+++ 4026 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.239237600E09 +++$+++ Hello, I may be able to help you.  For which article are you seeing this problem? \u2014<font face=\"Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ :Hello, I may be able to help you.  For which article are you seeing this problem? —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) 17:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

528315 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-23 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.203762480E09 +++$+++ I have closed your RfA as successful, as I believe that is the correct interpretation of the consensus given all relevant circumstances. I hope you will take on board the concerns raised by opposers and will factor them in when discharging your administrative duties in future. Best wishes, <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ I have closed your RfA as successful, as I believe that is the correct interpretation of the consensus given all relevant circumstances. I hope you will take on board the concerns raised by opposers and will factor them in when discharging your administrative duties in future. Best wishes, <font face="Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</font> 02:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
528316 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528315 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.203764820E09 +++$+++ Congratulations, ^demon, on the outcome of your RfA. I do kindly suggest taking things easy, though.  +++$+++ ::Congratulations, ^demon, on the outcome of your RfA. I do kindly suggest taking things easy, though. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 03:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
528317 +++$+++ JayHenry +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528315 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.203766740E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to drop a note to say that despite my comments to WJBscribe, I don't hold a grudge against you, and I'm certainly not seeking to have the decision overturned.  At this point I just want some clarity from him for the future.  From the tone of my earlier comments, you probably don't think too much of me right now, or even believe that I'm being sincere, and I understand that.  I also want to apologize for the comment I made regarding Veropedia, as I do think that's a really valuable project that has done much to help at Wikipedia.  I'm not anti-Veropedia, and I think you guys get much unfair criticism; I'm sorry to have added to that.  I wish you the best of luck, and hope in time we have the chance to work together on something and bury any remnants of what probably feels like a hatchet.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::: I just wanted to drop a note to say that despite my comments to WJBscribe, I don't hold a grudge against you, and I'm certainly not seeking to have the decision overturned.  At this point I just want some clarity from him for the future.  From the tone of my earlier comments, you probably don't think too much of me right now, or even believe that I'm being sincere, and I understand that.  I also want to apologize for the comment I made regarding Veropedia, as I do think that's a really valuable project that has done much to help at Wikipedia.  I'm not anti-Veropedia, and I think you guys get much unfair criticism; I'm sorry to have added to that.  I wish you the best of luck, and hope in time we have the chance to work together on something and bury any remnants of what probably feels like a hatchet.  Sincerely, --[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] ([[User talk:JayHenry|talk]]) 03:39, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
528318 +++$+++ Alison +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528315 +++$+++ 528315 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.203771180E09 +++$+++ Wow! Congratulations, indeed, and welcome back to the mayhem that's adminship :) Good to have you back -  +++$+++ : Wow! Congratulations, indeed, and welcome back to the mayhem that's adminship :) Good to have you back - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 04:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

4028 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4028 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-08 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.239237840E09 +++$+++ Lately it happens every time I do a citation, on any article, but it used to happen only occasionally.  +++$+++ Lately it happens every time I do a citation, on any article, but it used to happen only occasionally. [[User:AlbertSM|AlbertSM]] ([[User talk:AlbertSM#top|talk]]) 17:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
4029 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4028 +++$+++ 4028 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.239239640E09 +++$+++ It may be the syntax.  All citations should started with <code><nowiki><ref><\/nowiki><\/code> and end with <code><nowiki><\/ref><\/nowiki><\/code>.  The article should also have a \"References\" section or something similar where <code><nowiki><references \/><\/nowiki><\/code> exists so the references can be displayed.  If you see the issue pop up again, let me know! \u2014<font face=\"Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ :It may be the syntax.  All citations should started with <code><nowiki><ref></nowiki></code> and end with <code><nowiki></ref></nowiki></code>.  The article should also have a "References" section or something similar where <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code> exists so the references can be displayed.  If you see the issue pop up again, let me know! —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) 18:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

266175 +++$+++ A Ramachandran +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266175 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.168602000E09 +++$+++ Though I was afraid we might hit an edit conflict (the technical kind, not the edit warring kind). Thanks for removing the duplicate see also, I didn't notice that [[Chorten]] redirected to [[Stupa]]. Kinda stupa of me. :-)  +++$+++ Though I was afraid we might hit an edit conflict (the technical kind, not the edit warring kind). Thanks for removing the duplicate see also, I didn't notice that [[Chorten]] redirected to [[Stupa]]. Kinda stupa of me. :-) [[User:A Ramachandran|A Ramachandran]] 03:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
266176 +++$+++ A Ramachandran +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266175 +++$+++ 266175 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.168639200E09 +++$+++ I first met him back in the late 80s\/early 90s. He used to come to [[Taos, New Mexico|Taos]] for events at the [[Neem Karoli Baba]] ashram there.  +++$+++ :I first met him back in the late 80s/early 90s. He used to come to [[Taos, New Mexico|Taos]] for events at the [[Neem Karoli Baba]] ashram there. [[User:A Ramachandran|A Ramachandran]] 14:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

266180 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.168658460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your message. Unfortuately, that much I knew as I did spend quite a bit of time trying to get answers and trying to figure things out. But without a formal report, I can never be sure. Plus the sockpuppet labelling is inconsistent on the accounts, and one, Dattat, was labelled because of one edit connected to Shrank and at least one other, Liftwaffen, did not make any edits that violated policy.  But, to tell you the truth I don't care anymore. I see the whole sockpuppet business as highly corrupt and misused, a game some people like to play, and I don't see that changing. I've lost interest in my own sockpuppet issues as it is all tied up in mystery. But the more power to users like you who have faith in a better Wikipedia and are willing to work toward it. Thanks for your good efforts. Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Thanks for your message. Unfortuately, that much I knew as I did spend quite a bit of time trying to get answers and trying to figure things out. But without a formal report, I can never be sure. Plus the sockpuppet labelling is inconsistent on the accounts, and one, Dattat, was labelled because of one edit connected to Shrank and at least one other, Liftwaffen, did not make any edits that violated policy.  But, to tell you the truth I don't care anymore. I see the whole sockpuppet business as highly corrupt and misused, a game some people like to play, and I don't see that changing. I've lost interest in my own sockpuppet issues as it is all tied up in mystery. But the more power to users like you who have faith in a better Wikipedia and are willing to work toward it. Thanks for your good efforts. Sincerely, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 19:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
266181 +++$+++ Jefferson Anderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266180 +++$+++ 266180 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.168659000E09 +++$+++ Also, if you had found all that out, you are not quite the amateur you say you are. Modesty, I guess, eh? I don't know how to find out anything more about it myself...  +++$+++ :Also, if you had found all that out, you are not quite the amateur you say you are. Modesty, I guess, eh? I don't know how to find out anything more about it myself... [[User:Jefferson Anderson|Jefferson Anderson]] 19:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
266182 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266180 +++$+++ 266181 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.168660200E09 +++$+++ I apologise if I said something to offend you. I don't think I said I was an amateur. I have spent many months trying to figure this out. But in any event, I don't want to argue about this with you. As I said, I don't care anymore and I applaud you for for you efforts to improve. Again, I apologise for offending you. Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::I apologise if I said something to offend you. I don't think I said I was an amateur. I have spent many months trying to figure this out. But in any event, I don't want to argue about this with you. As I said, I don't care anymore and I applaud you for for you efforts to improve. Again, I apologise for offending you. Sincerely, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 19:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

4039 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4039 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-13 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.247538000E09 +++$+++ I will, but it's easy to forget when you're in the middle of editing an article. :) +++$+++ I will, but it's easy to forget when you're in the middle of editing an article. :)[[User:AlbertSM|AlbertSM]] ([[User talk:AlbertSM#top|talk]]) 19:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
4040 +++$+++ Zephyrad +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4039 +++$+++ 4039 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.247668320E09 +++$+++ The summary window is right above the \"Save Changes\" button. Can't miss it.  +++$+++ :The summary window is right above the "Save Changes" button. Can't miss it. [[User:Zephyrad|Zephyrad]] ([[User talk:Zephyrad|talk]]) 07:32, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

528328 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-25 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.203968220E09 +++$+++ You said. ''\"To anyone who says this close will bring problems in the future, could you please discuss said problems with me?\"'' I too think the issue with the close is mainly the precedent it sets for reconfirmation RfAs being different from normal RFAs, but I do have a specific question for you. Could I ask you to clarify what you meant by ''\"If re-approved, I wish to continue my work largely where I left off, in the realm of non-free content.\"''. To that end, you might want to read the thread at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Archive127#How to handle the WMF non-free image deadline]] and the (rather obscure) follow-up by Betacommand at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Betacommand#Random Proposal]]. Essentially, I am concerned about the timing of someone asking for their bit back to deal with non-free content as this deadline approaches, and I am concerned that some admins who are, shall we say, less enamoured of non-free content, might use the arrival of this deadline as a way to implement new speedy deletion criteria for images (or change existing speedy deletion criteria) without proper discussion. I have been trying for a week to start discussion on this issue, but few people seem to care. If you care, as I presume you do, I would be grateful if you could contribute to, or help start, the discussion, as well as clarifying your position on non-free content and when you would discuss and\/or fix a non-free image and its rationale\/source\/other problem rather than deleting. Thanks.  +++$+++ You said. ''"To anyone who says this close will bring problems in the future, could you please discuss said problems with me?"'' I too think the issue with the close is mainly the precedent it sets for reconfirmation RfAs being different from normal RFAs, but I do have a specific question for you. Could I ask you to clarify what you meant by ''"If re-approved, I wish to continue my work largely where I left off, in the realm of non-free content."''. To that end, you might want to read the thread at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive127#How to handle the WMF non-free image deadline]] and the (rather obscure) follow-up by Betacommand at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Betacommand#Random Proposal]]. Essentially, I am concerned about the timing of someone asking for their bit back to deal with non-free content as this deadline approaches, and I am concerned that some admins who are, shall we say, less enamoured of non-free content, might use the arrival of this deadline as a way to implement new speedy deletion criteria for images (or change existing speedy deletion criteria) without proper discussion. I have been trying for a week to start discussion on this issue, but few people seem to care. If you care, as I presume you do, I would be grateful if you could contribute to, or help start, the discussion, as well as clarifying your position on non-free content and when you would discuss and/or fix a non-free image and its rationale/source/other problem rather than deleting. Thanks. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 11:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
528329 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528328 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.203975900E09 +++$+++ Yeah. And getting people to avoid imploding over the issues. See [[WP:AN\/B]]. I still can't believe someone created a shortcut for that page. Can I also ask you, as someone who as far as I know hasn't got involved so far, and whose opinion I respect, whether [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bots\/BetaCommandBot_and_NFCC_10_c&oldid=193525379 this] is useful discussion or an attack page? The MFD was [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion\/Wikipedia:Bots\/BetaCommandBot and NFCC 10 c|here]] and I'm still in a fair amount of shock that redirection and protection was considered suitable. Oh and thanks for the reasoned reply. It is now at DRV, but I don't think many people who participated in the debate are aware of it. Is it acceptable to inform those who took part in the debate?  +++$+++ ::Yeah. And getting people to avoid imploding over the issues. See [[WP:AN/B]]. I still can't believe someone created a shortcut for that page. Can I also ask you, as someone who as far as I know hasn't got involved so far, and whose opinion I respect, whether [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bots/BetaCommandBot_and_NFCC_10_c&oldid=193525379 this] is useful discussion or an attack page? The MFD was [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Bots/BetaCommandBot and NFCC 10 c|here]] and I'm still in a fair amount of shock that redirection and protection was considered suitable. Oh and thanks for the reasoned reply. It is now at DRV, but I don't think many people who participated in the debate are aware of it. Is it acceptable to inform those who took part in the debate? [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 13:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
528330 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528328 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.203978360E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. Since you seem more responsive than some of those at the MfD, can I ask you what ''specific'' points are attacks? Following discussion with the closing admin, I am considering ressurecting the useful bits, but I can't do that if no-one wants to discuss which bits are useful and which bits are not. I archived the useful bits of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Bots\/BetaCommandBot_and_NFCC_10_c&oldid=192642999 here] to [[Wikipedia_talk:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Betacommand#Some_content_merged_from_Wikipedia_talk:Bots.2FBetaCommandBot_and_NFCC_10_c|here]], and no-one seems to have objected to that. Doing the same with the main page [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bots\/BetaCommandBot_and_NFCC_10_c&oldid=193525379 here] will be a real hassle, and I do need some outside opinion first. Would you be prepared to help point out the really bad bits that can be quietly dropped? The whole process of trying to extract the good bits from the bad is incredibly clunky. It would have been better if the whole thing had had an \"archive\" box slapped on it and it had been left to gather dust, but still visible.  +++$+++ ::::Fair enough. Since you seem more responsive than some of those at the MfD, can I ask you what ''specific'' points are attacks? Following discussion with the closing admin, I am considering ressurecting the useful bits, but I can't do that if no-one wants to discuss which bits are useful and which bits are not. I archived the useful bits of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Bots/BetaCommandBot_and_NFCC_10_c&oldid=192642999 here] to [[Wikipedia_talk:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Betacommand#Some_content_merged_from_Wikipedia_talk:Bots.2FBetaCommandBot_and_NFCC_10_c|here]], and no-one seems to have objected to that. Doing the same with the main page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bots/BetaCommandBot_and_NFCC_10_c&oldid=193525379 here] will be a real hassle, and I do need some outside opinion first. Would you be prepared to help point out the really bad bits that can be quietly dropped? The whole process of trying to extract the good bits from the bad is incredibly clunky. It would have been better if the whole thing had had an "archive" box slapped on it and it had been left to gather dust, but still visible. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 14:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

568652 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-08 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.155051660E09 +++$+++ Hi Aeropagitica. Could you point me to the info for this vandalism and civility block on Bakasuprman please? Bakasuprman and BhaiSaab have been sparring for a while now, the subcontinental religious stuff has flared up lately and you can see that I have a lot of notices on my talk page, and the first topic in the latest archive (from around 10 different people) to intervene in a range of disputes and it gets hectic trawling through the edits of a dozen editors every day for possible misdemaenours. Its good to be careful since in this region of editing, there have been a lot of bogus reports like \"vandalism\" against \"opposition\" editors in an attempt to discredit them (one person even asked me to do a checkuser to see if another had been using socks to award themselves barnstars !?!?!). I'm just wondering because the two guys were arguing about their blocks for each other and they didn't seem to show that either of them were correct. I looked at the edits to the article and I didn't see any vandalism at all - just the addition of a section of text, which was sourced (so that block for repeatedly inserting opinions, extreme POV doesn't apply - unlike people who repeated insert \"Arabs are backward\" or \"Israel is a part of Palestine\" into the [[Israel]] article, whom I blocked) and as for the stuff on the talk page (civility), these guys do this stuff all the time, making dubious allegations of \"vandalism\", so nothing usually happens there, as they all do it, unless they use \"rv vandalism\" as an edit summary for a week..or more. Thanks, ''' +++$+++ Hi Aeropagitica. Could you point me to the info for this vandalism and civility block on Bakasuprman please? Bakasuprman and BhaiSaab have been sparring for a while now, the subcontinental religious stuff has flared up lately and you can see that I have a lot of notices on my talk page, and the first topic in the latest archive (from around 10 different people) to intervene in a range of disputes and it gets hectic trawling through the edits of a dozen editors every day for possible misdemaenours. Its good to be careful since in this region of editing, there have been a lot of bogus reports like "vandalism" against "opposition" editors in an attempt to discredit them (one person even asked me to do a checkuser to see if another had been using socks to award themselves barnstars !?!?!). I'm just wondering because the two guys were arguing about their blocks for each other and they didn't seem to show that either of them were correct. I looked at the edits to the article and I didn't see any vandalism at all - just the addition of a section of text, which was sourced (so that block for repeatedly inserting opinions, extreme POV doesn't apply - unlike people who repeated insert "Arabs are backward" or "Israel is a part of Palestine" into the [[Israel]] article, whom I blocked) and as for the stuff on the talk page (civility), these guys do this stuff all the time, making dubious allegations of "vandalism", so nothing usually happens there, as they all do it, unless they use "rv vandalism" as an edit summary for a week..or more. Thanks, '''[[User:Blnguyen|Blnguyen]]''' <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[User talk:Blnguyen|rant-line]] 08:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
568653 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568652 +++$+++ 568652 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.155051720E09 +++$+++ My userpage would be a convenient site as there is a lot of action on this and related matters there. Thanks, ''' +++$+++ :My userpage would be a convenient site as there is a lot of action on this and related matters there. Thanks, '''[[User:Blnguyen|Blnguyen]]''' <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[User talk:Blnguyen|rant-line]] 08:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

266187 +++$+++ Jefferson Anderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266187 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.168659960E09 +++$+++ And since you don't wish to discuss it further, ciao for now...  +++$+++ And since you don't wish to discuss it further, ciao for now... [[User:Jefferson Anderson|Jefferson Anderson]] 19:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
266188 +++$+++ Jefferson Anderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266187 +++$+++ 266187 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.168660500E09 +++$+++ NOW you've offended me with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&curid=6094823&diff=100284042&oldid=100283318 your last edit comment]. Paranoid much?  +++$+++ :NOW you've offended me with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&curid=6094823&diff=100284042&oldid=100283318 your last edit comment]. Paranoid much? [[User:Jefferson Anderson|Jefferson Anderson]] 19:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
266189 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266187 +++$+++ 266188 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.168661220E09 +++$+++ Then I apologise once again for having offended you. I admit I am paranoid. In my experience at Wikipedia there are only three people who amass material about the subject as you did  in one of your last messages.  I admit that because the wording was so familiar, it triggered fear reaction  in me. I am sorry and apologise for any faulty response that hurt you. Sincerely,  -- +++$+++ ::Then I apologise once again for having offended you. I admit I am paranoid. In my experience at Wikipedia there are only three people who amass material about the subject as you did  in one of your last messages.  I admit that because the wording was so familiar, it triggered fear reaction  in me. I am sorry and apologise for any faulty response that hurt you. Sincerely,  --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 20:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
266190 +++$+++ Jefferson Anderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266187 +++$+++ 266187 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.168661580E09 +++$+++ Really, I took some time to track that down at your request! I hardly had it at my fingertips. I spend at least half-an-hour following those links to help you out and then you accuse me of being angry. I don't see in my messages to you how you possible could have come to that conclusion. I'll remember not to try to help anybody out here again, especially not someone who has used 15 confirmed sockpuppets!  +++$+++ :Really, I took some time to track that down at your request! I hardly had it at my fingertips. I spend at least half-an-hour following those links to help you out and then you accuse me of being angry. I don't see in my messages to you how you possible could have come to that conclusion. I'll remember not to try to help anybody out here again, especially not someone who has used 15 confirmed sockpuppets! [[User:Jefferson Anderson|Jefferson Anderson]] 20:13, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
266191 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266187 +++$+++ 266190 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.168669620E09 +++$+++ I corrected a mistake in the deity section. With regards to the Hindu Pantheon, we need to be careful as small changes to wording could result in large changes to the context, not your fault though. But the other sections are not so sensitive to wording.thanks. +++$+++ ::I corrected a mistake in the deity section. With regards to the Hindu Pantheon, we need to be careful as small changes to wording could result in large changes to the context, not your fault though. But the other sections are not so sensitive to wording.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

393890 +++$+++ Huang Sir +++$+++ Nat +++$+++ 393890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-23 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.240516920E09 +++$+++ Firstly,my English is poor.As a consequence,I can't translate something professional written in Chinese to English.Secondly,how can I use an E-mail from the government regarded as the attitude of the government as the reference. +++$+++ Firstly,my English is poor.As a consequence,I can't translate something professional written in Chinese to English.Secondly,how can I use an E-mail from the government regarded as the attitude of the government as the reference.[[User:Huang Sir|Huang Sir]] ([[User talk:Huang Sir|talk]]) 13:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
393891 +++$+++ Zscout370 +++$+++ Nat +++$+++ 393890 +++$+++ 393890 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.255655940E09 +++$+++ I noticed a slight difference with the 1957 shield to the current one, however, I decided to redraw the shield to address the concerns at [[:Commons:Deletion requests\/File:Canadian Coat of Arms Shield.svg]]. Now, I want to hear your thoughts.  +++$+++ :I noticed a slight difference with the 1957 shield to the current one, however, I decided to redraw the shield to address the concerns at [[:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canadian Coat of Arms Shield.svg]]. Now, I want to hear your thoughts. [[User:Zscout370]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Zscout370|(Return Fire)]]</sup></small> 18:19, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

266192 +++$+++ Jefferson Anderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.168670640E09 +++$+++ I wish you good luck with the arbitration and all. I don't really understand it or how I came to be mentioned in it. People involved in it seem to be suspicious of everybody, I guess. :-(  +++$+++ I wish you good luck with the arbitration and all. I don't really understand it or how I came to be mentioned in it. People involved in it seem to be suspicious of everybody, I guess. :-( [[User:Jefferson Anderson|Jefferson Anderson]] 22:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
266193 +++$+++ Jefferson Anderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266192 +++$+++ 266192 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.168671060E09 +++$+++ Oh, and please accept my apology in return, including apologizing for posting on your talk page one more time to do so. My response was not as gracious as it could have been, and that is my fault, not yours. I will not post on your talk page again after this unless you invite me to...  +++$+++ :Oh, and please accept my apology in return, including apologizing for posting on your talk page one more time to do so. My response was not as gracious as it could have been, and that is my fault, not yours. I will not post on your talk page again after this unless you invite me to... [[User:Jefferson Anderson|Jefferson Anderson]] 22:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
266194 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266192 +++$+++ 266193 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.168680960E09 +++$+++ Hi. Vijayanagara Empire-->I have completde the ECONOMY section.thanks. +++$+++ ::Hi. Vijayanagara Empire-->I have completde the ECONOMY section.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
266195 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266192 +++$+++ 266193 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.168684140E09 +++$+++ I am old fashioned. I mostly write it on a sheets of paper first reading from different sources, convince myself it is fairly close to what I read and then type in into wikiedia. Maybe a text editor is better.thanks. +++$+++ ::I am old fashioned. I mostly write it on a sheets of paper first reading from different sources, convince myself it is fairly close to what I read and then type in into wikiedia. Maybe a text editor is better.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:29, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
266196 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266192 +++$+++ 266193 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.168684920E09 +++$+++ If we can finish copy edit by early\/mid next week, by which time we can finalise on images to add\/remove, then we could move this for FA review.thanks. +++$+++ ::If we can finish copy edit by early/mid next week, by which time we can finalise on images to add/remove, then we could move this for FA review.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

528337 +++$+++ Rasamassen +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-04 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.204675860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for considering opening this debate back up.  +++$+++ Thanks for considering opening this debate back up. [[User:Rasamassen|Rasamassen]] ([[User talk:Rasamassen|talk]]) 16:11, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
528338 +++$+++ Rasamassen +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528337 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-04 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.204681020E09 +++$+++ I am asking to reopen the by-Fraternity ones for discussion.  +++$+++ ::I am asking to reopen the by-Fraternity ones for discussion. [[User:Rasamassen|Rasamassen]] ([[User talk:Rasamassen|talk]]) 17:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

266197 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266197 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-13 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.168685040E09 +++$+++ In the background I will work on the secular structures in the architecture page. I have some nice closeup images.thanks. +++$+++ In the background I will work on the secular structures in the architecture page. I have some nice closeup images.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
266198 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266197 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.168685580E09 +++$+++ Seems like the first four sections still need condensation. I shall go through it this weekend. I will also take a look at my albums to find appropriate images.thanks. +++$+++ ::Seems like the first four sections still need condensation. I shall go through it this weekend. I will also take a look at my albums to find appropriate images.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:53, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
266199 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266197 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.168741320E09 +++$+++ Sorry to hear you lost your edits. My fault. I shall make one or two minor edits and layoff so you can continue. give me 2 minutes.thanks. +++$+++ ::Sorry to hear you lost your edits. My fault. I shall make one or two minor edits and layoff so you can continue. give me 2 minutes.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
266200 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266197 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.168765380E09 +++$+++ Yes we need to summarize and reduce History, Economy, Administration and Social life by 10-20%. This should not be too difficult. I will take a closer look tommorow.thanks. +++$+++ :: Yes we need to summarize and reduce History, Economy, Administration and Social life by 10-20%. This should not be too difficult. I will take a closer look tommorow.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

528342 +++$+++ Matt Fitzpatrick +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528342 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-11 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.205261580E09 +++$+++ Speedy deletion of [[Wakfu]] was not appropriate under [[WP:CSD#G4|CSD G4]] for the following three reasons.  First, I wrote it entirely from scratch, thus it was not a copy of previously deleted material.  Second, the new version addressed every single concern underlying previous deletions.  Third, CSD G4 applies only to articles deleted by discussion, not to speedy deletions.  Kindly restore the article at your earliest convenience.  +++$+++ Speedy deletion of [[Wakfu]] was not appropriate under [[WP:CSD#G4|CSD G4]] for the following three reasons.  First, I wrote it entirely from scratch, thus it was not a copy of previously deleted material.  Second, the new version addressed every single concern underlying previous deletions.  Third, CSD G4 applies only to articles deleted by discussion, not to speedy deletions.  Kindly restore the article at your earliest convenience. [[User:Matt Fitzpatrick|Matt Fitzpatrick]] ([[User talk:Matt Fitzpatrick|talk]]) 11:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
528343 +++$+++ Matt Fitzpatrick +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528342 +++$+++ 528342 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.205270820E09 +++$+++ Much thanks!  +++$+++ :Much thanks! [[User:Matt Fitzpatrick|Matt Fitzpatrick]] ([[User talk:Matt Fitzpatrick|talk]]) 14:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

4057 +++$+++ HarringtonSmith +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-08 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.275991380E09 +++$+++ You tagged a line about NBC \"usurping\" ''Wizard of Oz'' from CBS for several years as being POV. I'm not sure I understand what makes it POV. Could you help? Thanks. \u2014  +++$+++ You tagged a line about NBC "usurping" ''Wizard of Oz'' from CBS for several years as being POV. I'm not sure I understand what makes it POV. Could you help? Thanks. — [[User:HarringtonSmith|HarringtonSmith]] ([[User talk:HarringtonSmith|talk]]) 03:03, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
4058 +++$+++ HarringtonSmith +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4057 +++$+++ 4057 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.275991740E09 +++$+++ I see you also added a \"weasel words\" tag. In order to make a ''constructive'' contribution, you must make your accusations more specific. Please cite some examples of what ''you'' consider weasel words \u2014 or, heaven forbid, ''fix'' some of them rather than just flagging 'em. \u2014  +++$+++ :I see you also added a "weasel words" tag. In order to make a ''constructive'' contribution, you must make your accusations more specific. Please cite some examples of what ''you'' consider weasel words — or, heaven forbid, ''fix'' some of them rather than just flagging 'em. — [[User:HarringtonSmith|HarringtonSmith]] ([[User talk:HarringtonSmith|talk]]) 03:09, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

4059 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-08 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.276038420E09 +++$+++ I thought the words \"usurping\" and shanghaied\" were more than a little exaggerated. They make it sound as if NBC stole \"The Wizard of Oz\" from CBS and that CBS stole it back.  +++$+++ I thought the words "usurping" and shanghaied" were more than a little exaggerated. They make it sound as if NBC stole "The Wizard of Oz" from CBS and that CBS stole it back. [[User:AlbertSM|AlbertSM]] ([[User talk:AlbertSM#top|talk]]) 16:07, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
4060 +++$+++ HarringtonSmith +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4059 +++$+++ 4059 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.276040400E09 +++$+++ Why not ''fix'' them then? And they were ''intended'' to imply stealing; that's the ''point'' of the paragraph, isn't it? \u2014 to illustrate the competitive relationship the two networks had in the 1960s? Without that, the whole item is just a bullet point and should not even be ''in'' the article... what on earth ''difference'' does it make who aired the movie over that eight-year stretch? \u2014  +++$+++ :Why not ''fix'' them then? And they were ''intended'' to imply stealing; that's the ''point'' of the paragraph, isn't it? — to illustrate the competitive relationship the two networks had in the 1960s? Without that, the whole item is just a bullet point and should not even be ''in'' the article... what on earth ''difference'' does it make who aired the movie over that eight-year stretch? — [[User:HarringtonSmith|HarringtonSmith]] ([[User talk:HarringtonSmith|talk]]) 16:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

266204 +++$+++ Mlpkr +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266204 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.168824300E09 +++$+++ No, please continue improving the Indian articles. That helps a lot. Those are exceptional cases.  +++$+++ No, please continue improving the Indian articles. That helps a lot. Those are exceptional cases. [[User:Mlpkr|Mlpkr]] 17:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
266205 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266204 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.168825440E09 +++$+++ Hi. I took a look at Vijayanagara empire article. Its no going to be easy to eliminate too much stuff as they all seem important, unless we decide to simply remove chunks of ECONOMY, ADMIN and SOCIAL life. Maybe I should simply move to FA review and see what they say. We can start deciding on images in the mean time.thanks. +++$+++ ::Hi. I took a look at Vijayanagara empire article. Its no going to be easy to eliminate too much stuff as they all seem important, unless we decide to simply remove chunks of ECONOMY, ADMIN and SOCIAL life. Maybe I should simply move to FA review and see what they say. We can start deciding on images in the mean time.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

528349 +++$+++ Black Mesa +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528349 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-11 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.205283960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Black Mesa|Black Mesa]] ([[User talk:Black Mesa|talk]]) 18:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
528350 +++$+++ Kim Bruning +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528349 +++$+++ 528349 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.205376120E09 +++$+++ Thank you! :-) -- +++$+++ : Thank you! :-) --[[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]] ([[User talk:Kim Bruning|talk]]) 19:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

266206 +++$+++ Kathryn_NicDhàna +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.168835940E09 +++$+++ Your comment at the proposed CR Mediation was insightful, well-written, and very helpful.  I greatly appreciate your taking the time to help clarify the situation.  Thanks again, <font face=\"Georgia\"> +++$+++ Your comment at the proposed CR Mediation was insightful, well-written, and very helpful.  I greatly appreciate your taking the time to help clarify the situation.  Thanks again, <font face="Georgia">[[User:Kathryn NicDhàna|<span style="color:navy"> ~ Kathryn NicDhàna</span>]] [[User_talk:Kathryn NicDhàna|♫]]<font color="navy">♦</font>[[Special:Contributions/Kathryn_NicDhàna|♫]]</font> 20:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
266207 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266206 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.168837380E09 +++$+++ Lets leave the LEAD alone for now untill the FA review. I have taken care of your dashed lines in GOVERNANCE though.thanks. +++$+++ ::Lets leave the LEAD alone for now untill the FA review. I have taken care of your dashed lines in GOVERNANCE though.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

528351 +++$+++ Shshshsh +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-11 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.205285700E09 +++$+++ Please restore the article. Why have you deleted it? The film was already released. I will clean it up.  +++$+++ Please restore the article. Why have you deleted it? The film was already released. I will clean it up. [[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 18:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
528352 +++$+++ Shshshsh +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528351 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.205366340E09 +++$+++ No problem friend. Just restore it. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::No problem friend. Just restore it. Thanks, [[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 16:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

266208 +++$+++ Venu62 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266208 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.168855860E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. Please see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Carnatic_music&curid=164188&diff=100781759&oldid=100781245 this]. [[User:Ncmvocalist]] is repetedly reverting\/removing citation needed templates from the article. I think it was you who first inserted these (correctly IMO) in the article. The article desparately needs some reliable references. Your attention will be much appreciated. Thanks  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. Please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carnatic_music&curid=164188&diff=100781759&oldid=100781245 this]. [[User:Ncmvocalist]] is repetedly reverting/removing citation needed templates from the article. I think it was you who first inserted these (correctly IMO) in the article. The article desparately needs some reliable references. Your attention will be much appreciated. Thanks [[User:Venu62|Parthi]] <sup><em>[[User_talk:Venu62|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Venu62|contribs]]</em></sup> 02:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
266209 +++$+++ Venu62 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266208 +++$+++ 266208 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.168856940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply. This article has a long history of conflicts. There are a couple of active editors who have strong opinions of how the article should be and have effectively sidelined most other editors from it, by IMO unfriendly behaviour. This particluar user simply will not listen to a second POV. I don't think I can communicate with him. However the article does need citations, and this user seems to have some knowledge on the subject. I was wondering whether you could persuade him to include some reliable references in the article. Thanks  +++$+++ :Thanks for your reply. This article has a long history of conflicts. There are a couple of active editors who have strong opinions of how the article should be and have effectively sidelined most other editors from it, by IMO unfriendly behaviour. This particluar user simply will not listen to a second POV. I don't think I can communicate with him. However the article does need citations, and this user seems to have some knowledge on the subject. I was wondering whether you could persuade him to include some reliable references in the article. Thanks [[User:Venu62|Parthi]] <sup><em>[[User_talk:Venu62|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Venu62|contribs]]</em></sup> 02:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
266210 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266208 +++$+++ 266209 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.168912620E09 +++$+++ The empire declined due to weak rulers. That sentence was there but I may have removed it as the details exists in the Kings infobox. I though it may be unnecessary.What do you think? +++$+++ ::The empire declined due to weak rulers. That sentence was there but I may have removed it as the details exists in the Kings infobox. I though it may be unnecessary.What do you think?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
266211 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266208 +++$+++ 266209 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.168912920E09 +++$+++ Please look at the FAC discussion page. user Nichalp has come up with a list of suggestions that needs to be taken care of. While I shall attend to this tonight, If you have time, take care of some and let me know which have been resolved.thanks +++$+++ ::Please look at the FAC discussion page. user Nichalp has come up with a list of suggestions that needs to be taken care of. While I shall attend to this tonight, If you have time, take care of some and let me know which have been resolved.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
266212 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266208 +++$+++ 266209 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.168913460E09 +++$+++ I can find a few sentences to put in the Nuniz page.Also try to find American English spellings that may have crept in. I believe they prefer English English spellings. thanks. +++$+++ ::I can find a few sentences to put in the Nuniz page.Also try to find American English spellings that may have crept in. I believe they prefer English English spellings. thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
266213 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266208 +++$+++ 266209 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.168916520E09 +++$+++ Why did you put so many red links in the Vijayanagara article. The more links we put the more stub pages we are expected to create.Many of them may not have been required.thanks. +++$+++ ::Why did you put so many red links in the Vijayanagara article. The more links we put the more stub pages we are expected to create.Many of them may not have been required.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
266214 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266208 +++$+++ 266209 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.168921440E09 +++$+++ Yes, we will have to create some stubs, no choice there.thanks. +++$+++ ::Yes, we will have to create some stubs, no choice there.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
266215 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266208 +++$+++ 266209 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.168924980E09 +++$+++ Goudas = bureaucrats? No. they are rich feudal landlords who had many powers granted at the lower levels by kings and chieftains.thanks +++$+++ ::Goudas = bureaucrats? No. they are rich feudal landlords who had many powers granted at the lower levels by kings and chieftains.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
266216 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266208 +++$+++ 266209 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.168925940E09 +++$+++ Main action items. a)get the SVG kind of infobox with correct map of territories.b)create stubs for redlinks c)clean up on stubby sentences d)make sure all wikilinks go to the correct intended articles.thanks. +++$+++ ::Main action items. a)get the SVG kind of infobox with correct map of territories.b)create stubs for redlinks c)clean up on stubby sentences d)make sure all wikilinks go to the correct intended articles.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

4065 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4065 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-17 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.284716100E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article [[:Liliom (1934 film)]], ''please cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]]'' for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]]. Take a look at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] for information about how to cite sources and the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article [[:Liliom (1934 film)]], ''please cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]]'' for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]]. Take a look at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] for information about how to cite sources and the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> [[User:Andrzejbanas|Andrzejbanas]] ([[User talk:Andrzejbanas|talk]]) 02:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
4066 +++$+++ Foobarnix +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4065 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-17 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.284718860E09 +++$+++ [[User:Foobarnix\/Project on 20th century French drama|Project on 20th century French drama]] -- +++$+++ :::: [[User:Foobarnix/Project on 20th century French drama|Project on 20th century French drama]] --[[User:Foobarnix|Foobarnix]] ([[User talk:Foobarnix|talk]]) 03:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

551677 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 551677 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-01 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.138783080E09 +++$+++ Hi there. Someone (maybe not you) has added subst: to the PAGENAME variable, and this breaks non-subst: usages. A removal of that would unbreak that problem, and there'd be no need for that message of yours. The tag has always worked fine in the past. Note that PAGENAME is not a template, it's a variable so there's no transclusion load. In fact, someone has made [[Template:PAGENAME]]. It should be unnecessary. - +++$+++ Hi there. Someone (maybe not you) has added subst: to the PAGENAME variable, and this breaks non-subst: usages. A removal of that would unbreak that problem, and there'd be no need for that message of yours. The tag has always worked fine in the past. Note that PAGENAME is not a template, it's a variable so there's no transclusion load. In fact, someone has made [[Template:PAGENAME]]. It should be unnecessary. -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Splash|talk]]</sup></small> 00:38, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
551678 +++$+++ Dbenbenn +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 551677 +++$+++ 551677 +++$+++ 2006-02-01 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.138783980E09 +++$+++ I added it.  See [[Template talk:Afd#template broken]].  There are two benefits to having the PAGENAME be substed.  1) If the article gets moved, the deletion discussion link doesn't break, and 2) Admins looking at the deleted article will still see the right link.   +++$+++ : I added it.  See [[Template talk:Afd#template broken]].  There are two benefits to having the PAGENAME be substed.  1) If the article gets moved, the deletion discussion link doesn't break, and 2) Admins looking at the deleted article will still see the right link.  [[User:Dbenbenn|dbenbenn]] | [[User talk:Dbenbenn|talk]] 00:53, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

524966 +++$+++ Meegs +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524966 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-29 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.138540620E09 +++$+++ By the way, I haven't had any new ideas about the external links.  I made three prototypes at [[User:Meegs\/NFL Player Sandbox]], but other than the lower left one (which I think is impossible if all of the links are optional parameters), I'm not crazy about any of them. Any thoughts? '''''\xd7''''' +++$+++ By the way, I haven't had any new ideas about the external links.  I made three prototypes at [[User:Meegs/NFL Player Sandbox]], but other than the lower left one (which I think is impossible if all of the links are optional parameters), I'm not crazy about any of them. Any thoughts? '''''×'''''[[User:Meegs|Meegs]] 05:17, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
524967 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524966 +++$+++ 524966 +++$+++ 2006-01-31 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.138750260E09 +++$+++ They exploit isn't too bad, but it limits the deep linking to the specific round, which isn't a huge problem, but I'd rather see a field like \"DraftNotes\" or something like that, which could handle odd cases like the supplemental drafts for the [[USFL]] and [[Bernie Kosar]], etc. And I agree with your judgement on the infoboxes - I like the one in the lower left the best. -- +++$+++ :They exploit isn't too bad, but it limits the deep linking to the specific round, which isn't a huge problem, but I'd rather see a field like "DraftNotes" or something like that, which could handle odd cases like the supplemental drafts for the [[USFL]] and [[Bernie Kosar]], etc. And I agree with your judgement on the infoboxes - I like the one in the lower left the best. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 15:31, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
524968 +++$+++ Meegs +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524966 +++$+++ 524967 +++$+++ 2006-02-07 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.139328840E09 +++$+++ '''''\xd7''''' +++$+++ ::'''''×'''''[[User:Meegs|Meegs]] 08:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

4073 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4073 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-09 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.299662040E09 +++$+++ How do you correct the title of a Wikipedia article if it isn't spelled correctly? I notice you can edit practically anything in the article ''but'' the title.  +++$+++ How do you correct the title of a Wikipedia article if it isn't spelled correctly? I notice you can edit practically anything in the article ''but'' the title. [[User:AlbertSM|AlbertSM]] ([[User talk:AlbertSM#top|talk]]) 01:14, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
4074 +++$+++ Ponyo +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4073 +++$+++ 4073 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.299714060E09 +++$+++ You need to use the \"move\" tab to move it to the correct spelling. Which article is it? I can help if you'd like. -- +++$+++ :You need to use the "move" tab to move it to the correct spelling. Which article is it? I can help if you'd like. --[[User:Ponyo|<b><font color="Navy">''Jezebel's''</font></b><font color="Navy">Ponyo</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 15:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

4075 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4075 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-09 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.299727680E09 +++$+++ His name should be spelled Vasili Vainonen, not Vanionen. But I don't know where the Move tab is.  +++$+++ His name should be spelled Vasili Vainonen, not Vanionen. But I don't know where the Move tab is. [[User:AlbertSM|AlbertSM]] ([[User talk:AlbertSM#top|talk]]) 19:28, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
4076 +++$+++ Ponyo +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4075 +++$+++ 4075 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.299728220E09 +++$+++ Ok, I've moved it for you. -- +++$+++ :Ok, I've moved it for you. --[[User:Ponyo|<b><font color="Navy">''Jezebel's''</font></b><font color="Navy">Ponyo</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 19:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

528366 +++$+++ OranL +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-20 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.208678640E09 +++$+++ Thank you! --  +++$+++ Thank you! -- [[User:OranL|OranL]] ([[User talk:OranL|talk]]) 01:04, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
528367 +++$+++ OranL +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528366 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-20 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.208749380E09 +++$+++ Thanks again! --  +++$+++ ::Thanks again! -- [[User:OranL|OranL]] ([[User talk:OranL|talk]]) 20:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

4079 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4079 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-17 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.308371280E09 +++$+++ I just don't understand how everybody could call this the eighteenth season of the show when it premiered in 2001. To be the twentieth season, the show would have to have premiered in 1993 - eighteen years ago. +++$+++ I just don't understand how everybody could call this the eighteenth season of the show when it premiered in 2001. To be the twentieth season, the show would have to have premiered in 1993 - eighteen years ago.[[User:AlbertSM|AlbertSM]] ([[User talk:AlbertSM#top|talk]]) 21:28, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
4080 +++$+++ Intoronto1125 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4079 +++$+++ 4079 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.308373140E09 +++$+++ Season as in how many cycles of the show there have been. <font face=\"Comic Sans MS\"> +++$+++ :Season as in how many cycles of the show there have been. <font face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Intoronto1125|Intoronto1125]]</font><b><font color="red"><big>[[User talk:Intoronto1125|Talk]]</big></font></b><font color="orange">[[Special:Contributions/Intoronto1125|Contributions]]</font>  21:59, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

4082 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-17 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.308371520E09 +++$+++ I don't think it's vandalism. The article should be objective and I thought that sentence presented a point of view, a blatantly biased one, at that.  +++$+++ I don't think it's vandalism. The article should be objective and I thought that sentence presented a point of view, a blatantly biased one, at that. [[User:AlbertSM|AlbertSM]] ([[User talk:AlbertSM#top|talk]]) 21:32, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
4083 +++$+++ Intoronto1125 +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4082 +++$+++ 4082 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.308373140E09 +++$+++ I suggest you read [[Wikipedia:NEU]] before writing a statement like that. <font face=\"Comic Sans MS\"> +++$+++ :I suggest you read [[Wikipedia:NEU]] before writing a statement like that. <font face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Intoronto1125|Intoronto1125]]</font><b><font color="red"><big>[[User talk:Intoronto1125|Talk]]</big></font></b><font color="orange">[[Special:Contributions/Intoronto1125|Contributions]]</font>  21:59, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

44371 +++$+++ Zanze123 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-31 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.257021360E09 +++$+++ What is it about steaks that you believe counters scientific consensus?  +++$+++ What is it about steaks that you believe counters scientific consensus? [[User:Zanze123|Zanze123]] ([[User talk:Zanze123|talk]]) 13:36, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
44372 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44371 +++$+++ 44371 +++$+++ 2009-11-01 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.257061920E09 +++$+++ What makes you think I believe that? -  +++$+++ :What makes you think I believe that? - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 00:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
44373 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44371 +++$+++ 44371 +++$+++ 2009-11-01 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.257067620E09 +++$+++ Your ''opinion'' of \"many commercially published books\" is moot. Referenced content in the book is moot. You claiming academic support is moot. Scientific consensus from relevent academic communities is key. Please see [[WP:FRINGE]]. -  +++$+++ :Your ''opinion'' of "many commercially published books" is moot. Referenced content in the book is moot. You claiming academic support is moot. Scientific consensus from relevent academic communities is key. Please see [[WP:FRINGE]]. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 01:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

4084 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310709360E09 +++$+++ Please add references to [[WP:Reliable sources]] that support any changes you make to Wikipedia articles.  See also [[WP:V]] and [[WP:OR]].  Thanks.  --  +++$+++ Please add references to [[WP:Reliable sources]] that support any changes you make to Wikipedia articles.  See also [[WP:V]] and [[WP:OR]].  Thanks.  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 22:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
4085 +++$+++ Kleinzach +++$+++ AlbertSM +++$+++ 4084 +++$+++ 4084 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310731200E09 +++$+++ Reliable sources are always welcome however I don't agree with [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]]'s blanket reversal of your edits, so I have reinstated them. [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] can tag any particular facts he thinks are dubious. It's important to remember [[WP:AGF]]. --'' +++$+++ :Reliable sources are always welcome however I don't agree with [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]]'s blanket reversal of your edits, so I have reinstated them. [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] can tag any particular facts he thinks are dubious. It's important to remember [[WP:AGF]]. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 05:00, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

528374 +++$+++ CSDWarnBot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-07 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.210190400E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information_icon.svg|left]]Hello, this is a message from [[User:CSDWarnBot|an automated bot]]. A tag has been placed on [[:Category:Military Insignia images needing copyright status check]], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|[[User:{{{nominator}}}|{{{nominator}}}]]&nbsp;([[User talk:{{{nominator}}}|talk]]&nbsp;'''\xb7''' [[Special:Contributions\/{{{nominator}}}|contribs]]),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:Category:Military Insignia images needing copyright status check]] is used solely by a template that has been deleted ([[WP:CSD#C3|CSD C3]]). <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting [[:Category:Military Insignia images needing copyright status check]], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}<\/nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. Feel free to contact the [[User:CSDWarnBot|bot operator]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&page={{urlencode:Category:Military Insignia images needing copyright status check}} here]'''  +++$+++ [[Image:Information_icon.svg|left]]Hello, this is a message from [[User:CSDWarnBot|an automated bot]]. A tag has been placed on [[:Category:Military Insignia images needing copyright status check]], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|[[User:{{{nominator}}}|{{{nominator}}}]]&nbsp;([[User talk:{{{nominator}}}|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{{nominator}}}|contribs]]),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:Category:Military Insignia images needing copyright status check]] is used solely by a template that has been deleted ([[WP:CSD#C3|CSD C3]]). <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting [[:Category:Military Insignia images needing copyright status check]], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. Feel free to contact the [[User:CSDWarnBot|bot operator]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page={{urlencode:Category:Military Insignia images needing copyright status check}} here]''' [[User:CSDWarnBot|CSDWarnBot]] ([[User talk:CSDWarnBot|talk]]) 13:00, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
528375 +++$+++ 71.193.2.115 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528374 +++$+++ 528374 +++$+++ 2008-05-09 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.210357620E09 +++$+++ Dont worry, the Hang on template does not work, and as I can see from the link, it didnt work in your case either. Great Buracracy your a part of here. [[Special:Contributions\/71.193.2.115|71.193.2.115]] ( +++$+++ : Dont worry, the Hang on template does not work, and as I can see from the link, it didnt work in your case either. Great Buracracy your a part of here. [[Special:Contributions/71.193.2.115|71.193.2.115]] ([[User talk:71.193.2.115|talk]]) 11:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

4088 +++$+++ Periptero +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4088 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-06 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.294341240E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I would appreciate your help very much so as to give and end to this subject, at least for the moment. Regards.- +++$+++ Thank you, I would appreciate your help very much so as to give and end to this subject, at least for the moment. Regards.-[[User:Periptero|Periptero]] ([[User talk:Periptero|talk]]) 11:14, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
4089 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4088 +++$+++ 4088 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.294412100E09 +++$+++ I'll do my best, though I have never done this before, so it may take me some time. I too want it to end, but it seems there are some people ''determined'' to prevent it from happening. I mean look at this: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files\/2011_January_6&diff=prev&oldid=406319023]. I want to wait and see what will happen with the Leonidas image, but even if it is deleted, it's not like there is a shortage of notable Greeks. But rest assured, that collage ''will'' go up, with or without Leonidas, and whether some people like or not.  +++$+++ :I'll do my best, though I have never done this before, so it may take me some time. I too want it to end, but it seems there are some people ''determined'' to prevent it from happening. I mean look at this: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2011_January_6&diff=prev&oldid=406319023]. I want to wait and see what will happen with the Leonidas image, but even if it is deleted, it's not like there is a shortage of notable Greeks. But rest assured, that collage ''will'' go up, with or without Leonidas, and whether some people like or not. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 06:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
4090 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4088 +++$+++ 4088 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.294412160E09 +++$+++ P.S. Been to [[Buenos Aires|B.A.]], and it's one of my favorite cities in the world. Narrowly missed a chance to go there again recently.  +++$+++ :P.S. Been to [[Buenos Aires|B.A.]], and it's one of my favorite cities in the world. Narrowly missed a chance to go there again recently. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 06:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

266234 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.169119320E09 +++$+++ The kingdom does not even have an article of its own. There may be a couple more really minor Nayakas around (Nayaka literally means ''leader''). +++$+++ The kingdom does not even have an article of its own. There may be a couple more really minor Nayakas around (Nayaka literally means ''leader'').[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:22, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
266235 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266234 +++$+++ 266234 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.169159520E09 +++$+++ Hi Southernstar! As you can see from the template at the top of the page, this article is being reviewed for Featured Article status. See [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates]] and [[Wikipedia:Featured article criteria]]. To qualify as a Feature Article a strict format must be followed. Your entry violates the FA format rules. Specifically, see [[Wikipedia:Guide to layout#Standard appendices]]. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Hi Southernstar! As you can see from the template at the top of the page, this article is being reviewed for Featured Article status. See [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates]] and [[Wikipedia:Featured article criteria]]. To qualify as a Feature Article a strict format must be followed. Your entry violates the FA format rules. Specifically, see [[Wikipedia:Guide to layout#Standard appendices]]. Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 14:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

4091 +++$+++ Lysus.K +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-07 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.294465080E09 +++$+++ \u03a4\u03b5\u03bb\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1,\u03bc\u03b1\u03bb\u03bb\u03bf\u03bd \u03b1\u03c0\u03b1\u03be\u03b9\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03b1\u03c0\u03b1\u03bd\u03c4\u03b7\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03bf\u03b9 \u03b5\u03b9\u03bd\u03b1\u03b9 \u03b5\u03ba\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9  \u03bf\u03b9 \"\u0391\u03bb\u03b2\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9\" \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf\u03c5\u03bd \u03c3\u03c4\u03b7 \u03b2\u03bf\u03c1\u03b5\u03b9\u03bf\u03b4\u03c5\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03b7 \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03b1\u03b4\u03b1 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03b1\u03c0\u03bf\u03c4\u03b5\u03bb\u03bf\u03c5\u03bd  \u03c0\u03bf\u03c3\u03bf\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf \u03bc\u03b9\u03ba\u03c1\u03bf\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03bf \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 10% \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03b8\u03c5\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 \u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b9\u03bf\u03c7\u03b7\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03b5\u03c0\u03b9\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2  \u03bc\u03b1\u03bb\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1 \u03bf\u03c4\u03b9 \u03bf \u03b5\u03bd \u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03c9 \u03c7\u03b1\u03c1\u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 \u03c3\u03c4\u03bf \u03b1\u03c1\u03b8\u03c1\u03bf \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03b1\u03bb\u03b2\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03b1\u03c0\u03b5\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf\u03bd\u03b9\u03b6\u03b5\u03b9. +++$+++ Τελικα,μαλλον απαξιεις να απαντησεις ποιοι ειναι εκεινοι  οι "Αλβανοι" που κατοικουν στη βορειοδυτικη Ελλαδα και αποτελουν  ποσοστο μικροτερο του 10% του πληθυσμου της περιοχης και επιμενεις  μαλιστα οτι ο εν λογω χαρτης στο αρθρο για τους αλβανους τους απεικονιζει.[[User:Lysus.K|Lysus.K]] ([[User talk:Lysus.K|talk]]) 21:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
4092 +++$+++ CoolMartini +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4091 +++$+++ 4091 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.294471980E09 +++$+++ Hi. Thank you for your understanding about proving that I'm not an elephant. Can you help with getting Himara revolt in the dyk nominations page? +++$+++ :Hi. Thank you for your understanding about proving that I'm not an elephant. Can you help with getting Himara revolt in the dyk nominations page?[[User:CoolMartini|CoolMartini]] ([[User talk:CoolMartini|talk]]) 23:33, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

266236 +++$+++ Jefferson Anderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.169176500E09 +++$+++ I hate to post here after our recent dispute, but it appears to be the best way to communicate. The translation was done by C.P. Brown and published in 1829! In the US, anything published before 1923 is in the [[public domain]]. Elsewhere, things go into the public domain 70 years after the death of the author (or translator in this case). Brown died in 1884. His translations passed into the public domain in 1954. There is even a page on sacred-texts.org that states that the work is in the public domain, [http:\/\/www.sacred-texts.com\/hin\/vov\/vov00.htm here]. Hope this helps your understanding of the situation.  +++$+++ I hate to post here after our recent dispute, but it appears to be the best way to communicate. The translation was done by C.P. Brown and published in 1829! In the US, anything published before 1923 is in the [[public domain]]. Elsewhere, things go into the public domain 70 years after the death of the author (or translator in this case). Brown died in 1884. His translations passed into the public domain in 1954. There is even a page on sacred-texts.org that states that the work is in the public domain, [http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/vov/vov00.htm here]. Hope this helps your understanding of the situation. [[User:Jefferson Anderson|Jefferson Anderson]] 19:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
266237 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266236 +++$+++ 266236 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.169177040E09 +++$+++ It's fine that you fixed it up. Thanks. My only interest in it is for Dinesh and the FA review. Please do not post on my page again. Thank you. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :It's fine that you fixed it up. Thanks. My only interest in it is for Dinesh and the FA review. Please do not post on my page again. Thank you. Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 19:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

4093 +++$+++ Greco22 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4093 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-09 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.294633020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Greco22|Greco22]] ([[User talk:Greco22|talk]]) 20:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
4094 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4093 +++$+++ 4093 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.294638300E09 +++$+++ I prefer the one from the \u03c0\u03b5\u03bd\u03c4\u03bf\u03c7\u03af\u03bb\u03b9\u03b1\u03c1\u03bf aesthetically, an it's also the most well-known.  +++$+++ :I prefer the one from the πεντοχίλιαρο aesthetically, an it's also the most well-known. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 21:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

266238 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.169176920E09 +++$+++ copyedit [[Hoysala literature]] and [[Western Chalukya literature]] since they are small sections. For Vijayanagara, I just need to add the ref info for the Astadiggaja page you pointed out. looks like all is smooth on the FAC so far. +++$+++ copyedit [[Hoysala literature]] and [[Western Chalukya literature]] since they are small sections. For Vijayanagara, I just need to add the ref info for the Astadiggaja page you pointed out. looks like all is smooth on the FAC so far.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:22, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
266239 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266238 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.169177520E09 +++$+++ You could use the strike out method. Also dont bother to wikilink any of the poets as we are not ready right now to create stubs for them with the FA going on and all. Just trim up the pages for English prose. Many of the words are Indian words (names of writings) so not much you can do there. thanks. +++$+++ ::You could use the strike out method. Also dont bother to wikilink any of the poets as we are not ready right now to create stubs for them with the FA going on and all. Just trim up the pages for English prose. Many of the words are Indian words (names of writings) so not much you can do there. thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
266240 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266238 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.169183220E09 +++$+++ I understand. You may start working on [[Western Chalukyas]]. +++$+++ ::I understand. You may start working on [[Western Chalukyas]].[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

528384 +++$+++ Friday +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528384 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-20 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.211321160E09 +++$+++ Am I reading [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=213685104 this] correctly?  If I am.. this is one of the most worrying things I've ever seen any admin say.  I've concluded lately that those supporting Betacommand regardless of circumstances are actually a ''bigger'' part of the problem than BC himself.  Beta is (I assume) a kid who doesn't know any better.  His behavior continues to be so unreasonable that I can only assume he keeps it up because he has some crowd of supporters somewhere, cheering him on.  I blame this crowd of supporters for the huge role they play in this problem.  They need to stop.  You are declaring yourself one of them, even to the point of intending to unblock him regardless of circumstances?!?  Beta has been a continuous problem for way too long, and if it weren't for people unblocking him, this problem could, just maybe, have been solved long ago.  This declaration of intent to interfere with anyone attempting to solve this problem just baffles me.  Am I missing something?   +++$+++ Am I reading [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=213685104 this] correctly?  If I am.. this is one of the most worrying things I've ever seen any admin say.  I've concluded lately that those supporting Betacommand regardless of circumstances are actually a ''bigger'' part of the problem than BC himself.  Beta is (I assume) a kid who doesn't know any better.  His behavior continues to be so unreasonable that I can only assume he keeps it up because he has some crowd of supporters somewhere, cheering him on.  I blame this crowd of supporters for the huge role they play in this problem.  They need to stop.  You are declaring yourself one of them, even to the point of intending to unblock him regardless of circumstances?!?  Beta has been a continuous problem for way too long, and if it weren't for people unblocking him, this problem could, just maybe, have been solved long ago.  This declaration of intent to interfere with anyone attempting to solve this problem just baffles me.  Am I missing something?  [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 15:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
528385 +++$+++ Betacommand2 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528384 +++$+++ 528384 +++$+++ 2008-05-20 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.211322180E09 +++$+++ Friday please remember what happens when you AssUMe. Im probably older than you. I have found the best method for working is to make myself perfectly clear. Hand holding and codling are very ineffective in most cases. Being frank and making my point clearly is more effective than not. people clearly stating the facts and calling spades spades results 98% of the time in clearer communication.  +++$+++ :Friday please remember what happens when you AssUMe. Im probably older than you. I have found the best method for working is to make myself perfectly clear. Hand holding and codling are very ineffective in most cases. Being frank and making my point clearly is more effective than not. people clearly stating the facts and calling spades spades results 98% of the time in clearer communication. [[User talk:Betacommand2|β<sup><sub>command <small>2</small></sub></sup>]] 15:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
528386 +++$+++ Friday +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528384 +++$+++ 528385 +++$+++ 2008-05-20 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.211322420E09 +++$+++ I've never known you to make yourself clear.  Indeed, some of the findings in one of your arbcom cases involved your repeatedly poor communication.  Do you really not see that this is a problem?   +++$+++ ::I've never known you to make yourself clear.  Indeed, some of the findings in one of your arbcom cases involved your repeatedly poor communication.  Do you really not see that this is a problem?  [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 15:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
528387 +++$+++ Friday +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528384 +++$+++ 528385 +++$+++ 2008-05-20 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.211321760E09 +++$+++ You really do?  Man, I just don't see it.  Of course, I know Beta only from what he does on the Wiki. Do you know him from somewhere else?  I'm no fan of simpering insincerity masquerading as civility either, but being \"nice\" is not my problem with Beta.  You simply cannot collaborate with him- his communication skills are terrible. This is a collaborative project, and he's fundamentally incapable of collaborating.  He does unreasonable things way too frequently and no amount of people saying \"please cut that out\" has had any effect.  Editors are like bees- a single one is (usually) fairly insignificant.  Where you see good work, I see him poisoning the hive.   What is it that he does that you consider so useful?  What would it take to get you to step back from the situation and stop promising to interfere?   +++$+++ ::You really do?  Man, I just don't see it.  Of course, I know Beta only from what he does on the Wiki. Do you know him from somewhere else?  I'm no fan of simpering insincerity masquerading as civility either, but being "nice" is not my problem with Beta.  You simply cannot collaborate with him- his communication skills are terrible. This is a collaborative project, and he's fundamentally incapable of collaborating.  He does unreasonable things way too frequently and no amount of people saying "please cut that out" has had any effect.  Editors are like bees- a single one is (usually) fairly insignificant.  Where you see good work, I see him poisoning the hive.   What is it that he does that you consider so useful?  What would it take to get you to step back from the situation and stop promising to interfere?  [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 15:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
528388 +++$+++ Betacommand2 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528384 +++$+++ 528387 +++$+++ 2008-05-20 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.211322420E09 +++$+++ Friday have you ever nicely approached me with a request for assistance? a always seem to see hostility from you.  +++$+++ :::Friday have you ever nicely approached me with a request for assistance? a always seem to see hostility from you. [[User talk:Betacommand2|β<sup><sub>command <small>2</small></sub></sup>]] 15:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
528389 +++$+++ Friday +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528384 +++$+++ 528388 +++$+++ 2008-05-20 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.211322660E09 +++$+++ I presented evidence on this long ago- see [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Betacommand\/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Friday]].  Since then, I've mostly given up trying to talk to you.  I see that others have sometimes tried, and I don't see that they get any different results than I got.  I don't have specific earlier examples handy, but the reason I gave the evidence I did was that by that time, I recognized this as a recurring problem, rather than just an isolated incident.   +++$+++ ::::I presented evidence on this long ago- see [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Betacommand/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Friday]].  Since then, I've mostly given up trying to talk to you.  I see that others have sometimes tried, and I don't see that they get any different results than I got.  I don't have specific earlier examples handy, but the reason I gave the evidence I did was that by that time, I recognized this as a recurring problem, rather than just an isolated incident.  [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 15:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
528390 +++$+++ Betacommand2 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528384 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-20 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.211323200E09 +++$+++ I regularly help a large number of users, [[User talk:Betacommand\/20080501#POV search]] is one example.  +++$+++ ::::::I regularly help a large number of users, [[User talk:Betacommand/20080501#POV search]] is one example. [[User talk:Betacommand2|β<sup><sub>command <small>2</small></sub></sup>]] 15:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
528391 +++$+++ Betacommand2 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528384 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-20 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.211323380E09 +++$+++ or ask for clarifacion.  +++$+++ ::::::or ask for clarifacion. [[User talk:Betacommand2|β<sup><sub>command <small>2</small></sub></sup>]] 15:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

266241 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.169183820E09 +++$+++ that I will be invloved in (regarding [[Chalukya dynasty]], [[Rashtrakuta]]). A very disruptive user and frequent sock puppetear has been fighting hard to make his own rules and this has resulted in discord in the two above mentioned articles (one of which I was a major contributor towards to bring to FA). So if I am not so responsive to your messages, dont be disheartened. Right now ofcourse, the main goal is to bring Vijayanagara to FA. thanks. +++$+++ that I will be invloved in (regarding [[Chalukya dynasty]], [[Rashtrakuta]]). A very disruptive user and frequent sock puppetear has been fighting hard to make his own rules and this has resulted in discord in the two above mentioned articles (one of which I was a major contributor towards to bring to FA). So if I am not so responsive to your messages, dont be disheartened. Right now ofcourse, the main goal is to bring Vijayanagara to FA. thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:17, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
266242 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.169185320E09 +++$+++ well, when I said arb, I meant it will go thru all the stages invloved before arb. This person who has been troubling Karnataka related articles has a history of disruptive edits and has been involved in hundreds of edit battles in articles related to Karnataka (he is from outside the state).Now he has started to use his native language citations to contradict English language citations I have provided from English sources. wiki rules clearly states that English language books should be given preference in English wiki. He refuses to accept this.hence... +++$+++ ::well, when I said arb, I meant it will go thru all the stages invloved before arb. This person who has been troubling Karnataka related articles has a history of disruptive edits and has been involved in hundreds of edit battles in articles related to Karnataka (he is from outside the state).Now he has started to use his native language citations to contradict English language citations I have provided from English sources. wiki rules clearly states that English language books should be given preference in English wiki. He refuses to accept this.hence...[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
266243 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.169186580E09 +++$+++ I corrected the redirect for [[Kalyani Chalukyas]]. Yes I am aware this could be time consuming process. The person who has been trying to harrass me intends to slow me down. He is not happy with too many FA from Karnataka. Welcome to India +++$+++ ::I corrected the redirect for [[Kalyani Chalukyas]]. Yes I am aware this could be time consuming process. The person who has been trying to harrass me intends to slow me down. He is not happy with too many FA from Karnataka. Welcome to India[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
266244 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.169187600E09 +++$+++ He is the same person who tried to discredit me on the Hoysala Empire FA discussion page (unsuccessfully) and then again on Vijayanagara empire peer review discussion page. Interesting!!!!. +++$+++ ::He is the same person who tried to discredit me on the Hoysala Empire FA discussion page (unsuccessfully) and then again on Vijayanagara empire peer review discussion page. Interesting!!!!.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
266245 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.169238960E09 +++$+++ Some reviewers did not like \"ancient and indegenous Hindu Dharma\" and wanted Hinduism in general.thats all. Dont worry about what wiki definition for Hinduism. It can change tommorow and again the day after. +++$+++ ::Some reviewers did not like "ancient and indegenous Hindu Dharma" and wanted Hinduism in general.thats all. Dont worry about what wiki definition for Hinduism. It can change tommorow and again the day after.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 12:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
266246 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.169244360E09 +++$+++ Whcih FA. Vijayanagara is still not a FA?thanks. +++$+++ ::Whcih FA. Vijayanagara is still not a FA?thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 14:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
266247 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.169250420E09 +++$+++ The person who nominates is Raul, the director. I dont see his edits on the discussion page. Where do you see it. The discussion page still says FA candidate thats all.thanks. +++$+++ ::The person who nominates is Raul, the director. I dont see his edits on the discussion page. Where do you see it. The discussion page still says FA candidate thats all.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
266248 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.169251500E09 +++$+++ No hesitancy. Just an occupational disease. Its not done untill its done. +++$+++ ::No hesitancy. Just an occupational disease. Its not done untill its done.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 16:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
266249 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.169267820E09 +++$+++ I looked at the web sites you sent me. The problem with Amazon.com is thay deal mostly in general books (while some books are specific and good) compared to more specific books available thru other sources in India. +++$+++ ::I looked at the web sites you sent me. The problem with Amazon.com is thay deal mostly in general books (while some books are specific and good) compared to more specific books available thru other sources in India.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:37, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
266250 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.169272920E09 +++$+++ I just sent you my first email.thanks +++$+++ ::I just sent you my first email.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
266251 +++$+++ Sarvabhaum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.169345520E09 +++$+++ It seems u were discussing about me. The reality is that Mr.Kannambadi is full of hatred against other languages that he wants every great empire (even if it is non-Kannadiga) to be labelled as kannadiga. he is removing Marathi citations when wikipedia rules clearly say it can be used. If u see chalukya and rashtrakuta he's deleting the info because it doesnt suite his 'stories'. Welcome to India!  +++$+++ :It seems u were discussing about me. The reality is that Mr.Kannambadi is full of hatred against other languages that he wants every great empire (even if it is non-Kannadiga) to be labelled as kannadiga. he is removing Marathi citations when wikipedia rules clearly say it can be used. If u see chalukya and rashtrakuta he's deleting the info because it doesnt suite his 'stories'. Welcome to India! [[User:Sarvabhaum|Sarvabhaum]] 18:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
266252 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266241 +++$+++ 266251 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.169346540E09 +++$+++ Savabhaum, my interest in  Dineshkannambadi's articles is that I copy edit them for Feature Article  candidacy. I am not an expert on India and cannot evaluate the article's content.  I am looking for grammatical errors, poor writing style etc. Have you read the [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Vijayanagara Empire]]? Many of those editors who make the decision are from India. They are in the position to make decisions of bias. (I know so little about India's history that I have difficulty understanding the articles.) I have not discussed you with anyone. I apologise to you if it seemed that I did.  Sincerely,  +++$+++ ::Savabhaum, my interest in  Dineshkannambadi's articles is that I copy edit them for Feature Article  candidacy. I am not an expert on India and cannot evaluate the article's content.  I am looking for grammatical errors, poor writing style etc. Have you read the [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Vijayanagara Empire]]? Many of those editors who make the decision are from India. They are in the position to make decisions of bias. (I know so little about India's history that I have difficulty understanding the articles.) I have not discussed you with anyone. I apologise to you if it seemed that I did.  Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 18:29, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

584982 +++$+++ Dihydrogen Monoxide +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-26 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.204041000E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For all the advice, support, and friendship you've given me over the <s>years<\/s> months. And for your attitude in general. Cheers, '' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For all the advice, support, and friendship you've given me over the <s>years</s> months. And for your attitude in general. Cheers, ''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|dihydrogen monoxide]]'' <small>([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|H<sub>2</sub>0]])</small> 07:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
584983 +++$+++ Dihydrogen Monoxide +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584982 +++$+++ 584982 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.204041000E09 +++$+++ On another note...there was a post on Pedro's talk page recently with someone suggesting he go RfB. He said he hasn't been an admin long enough, and it's true; he'd be shot down pretty quick IMO. You've been an admin for longer, and I really think that, if you've ever thought about it,  now might be a good time to think about it seriously... '' +++$+++ :On another note...there was a post on Pedro's talk page recently with someone suggesting he go RfB. He said he hasn't been an admin long enough, and it's true; he'd be shot down pretty quick IMO. You've been an admin for longer, and I really think that, if you've ever thought about it,  now might be a good time to think about it seriously... ''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|dihydrogen monoxide]]'' <small>([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|H<sub>2</sub>0]])</small> 07:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
584984 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584982 +++$+++ 584983 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.204077960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the Barnstar, and you're welcome for the Barnstar I gave you. :) I've sent an E-mail, too.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the Barnstar, and you're welcome for the Barnstar I gave you. :) I've sent an E-mail, too. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
584985 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584982 +++$+++ 584982 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.204074540E09 +++$+++ Fansites are generally considered inappropriate external links, which is the only reason I removed them.  +++$+++ :Fansites are generally considered inappropriate external links, which is the only reason I removed them. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
584986 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584982 +++$+++ 584982 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.204085760E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :)  +++$+++ :You're welcome. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

4099 +++$+++ Dr. Persi +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-30 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.296459120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dr. Persi|Dr. Persi]] ([[User talk:Dr. Persi|talk]]) 23:32, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
4100 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.296460620E09 +++$+++ Thank you for responding. This is not a question of making Alexander look good or bad, it is a question of relevance. The point is, the destruction of Persepolis has nothing to do with Alexander's ''personality''.  The section to which you made the additions strictly discusses Alexander's personality and I don't see how the destruction of Persepolis relates to that. Neither does the source you use tie the destruction of Persepolis to Alexander's personality. Whether he ordered the destruction deliberately, whether it was a lapse of judgment, or whether it was an accident (it happened several ''months'' after the taking of Persepolis), we'll never really know, but whatever happened, I just don't see a connection to his personality. Btw, I have nothing against Persia and the Persian people, I have been to Persepolis and visited Cyrus' Tomb (and was quite impressed), but I really feel your additions, while sourced, stray from the subject of the personality section too much. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thank you for responding. This is not a question of making Alexander look good or bad, it is a question of relevance. The point is, the destruction of Persepolis has nothing to do with Alexander's ''personality''.  The section to which you made the additions strictly discusses Alexander's personality and I don't see how the destruction of Persepolis relates to that. Neither does the source you use tie the destruction of Persepolis to Alexander's personality. Whether he ordered the destruction deliberately, whether it was a lapse of judgment, or whether it was an accident (it happened several ''months'' after the taking of Persepolis), we'll never really know, but whatever happened, I just don't see a connection to his personality. Btw, I have nothing against Persia and the Persian people, I have been to Persepolis and visited Cyrus' Tomb (and was quite impressed), but I really feel your additions, while sourced, stray from the subject of the personality section too much. Regards, [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 23:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
4101 +++$+++ Dr. Persi +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ 4100 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.296485700E09 +++$+++ How about a move of the content to the appropriate section then? I agree but where in the article do you think this data fits?  +++$+++ ::How about a move of the content to the appropriate section then? I agree but where in the article do you think this data fits? [[User:Dr. Persi|Dr. Persi]] ([[User talk:Dr. Persi|talk]]) 06:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
4102 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ 4101 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.296488400E09 +++$+++ Frankly, per [[WP:LABEL]], considering the tone (e.g. \"savage orgy\"), I don't think it fits anywhere in an encyclopedia. A brief mention of the Persepolis incident is already included in the article, I think that's sufficient.  +++$+++ :::Frankly, per [[WP:LABEL]], considering the tone (e.g. "savage orgy"), I don't think it fits anywhere in an encyclopedia. A brief mention of the Persepolis incident is already included in the article, I think that's sufficient. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 07:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
4103 +++$+++ Dr. Persi +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ 4102 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.296518280E09 +++$+++ Tone is as per article, and it is as per that author who is very reliable a historical fact. We should not choose to censor certain data on the basis of its tone. I can cut out the \"savage\" from the text if you want. That still should be included becuase if we are to give a full picture of Alexander the Great, it shouldnt be just that he is \"amply intelligent\" or that he has \"great self control\" or that he is \"erudite\" but also that he sometimes is ok with orgies and such as well. I am going to add that to Persepolis section then. Are we in agreement?  +++$+++ ::::Tone is as per article, and it is as per that author who is very reliable a historical fact. We should not choose to censor certain data on the basis of its tone. I can cut out the "savage" from the text if you want. That still should be included becuase if we are to give a full picture of Alexander the Great, it shouldnt be just that he is "amply intelligent" or that he has "great self control" or that he is "erudite" but also that he sometimes is ok with orgies and such as well. I am going to add that to Persepolis section then. Are we in agreement? [[User:Dr. Persi|Dr. Persi]] ([[User talk:Dr. Persi|talk]]) 15:58, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
4104 +++$+++ Dr. Persi +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ 4102 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.296518760E09 +++$+++ OK, I moved the word \"savage\" and removed the section as per your discussio from \"personality\" to Persia. How do you do now? Is this acceptable? I even added \"according to a scholar...\" so as not to give the perception that this statement is widespread. cheers.  +++$+++ ::::OK, I moved the word "savage" and removed the section as per your discussio from "personality" to Persia. How do you do now? Is this acceptable? I even added "according to a scholar..." so as not to give the perception that this statement is widespread. cheers. [[User:Dr. Persi|Dr. Persi]] ([[User talk:Dr. Persi|talk]]) 16:06, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
4105 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ 4104 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.296532920E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid not. \"Violent orgy\" instead of \"Savage orgy\"? That is ''hardly'' a change. Look, the thing is, here in wikipedia, we have to use neutral wording and avoid such language. I'm sure I could find sources that use similar language for the deeds of the Persians during Xerxes' invasion of Greece, for the [[Fall of Constantinople]], for the capture of Jerusalem by the [[First Crusade]] (talk about savage), but as you can see, we don't use such language in those articles. We ''have'' to stick by [[WP:NPOV]] and avoid such colorful language. While authors such as the one you cite are not constrained to do so and can use whatever they see fit, in wikipedia it's different. I've been editing here since 2007, and I know what I'm talking about. Even about the [[Holocaust]] we do not use such language.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm getting the impression that you think the coverage of Alexander in the article is too \"positive\" and that's why you want to use such language, but that goes completely against the spirit of NPOV. [[WP:NPOV]] is one of the pillars of wikipedia, and we have to abide by it, like it or not. +++$+++ :::::I'm afraid not. "Violent orgy" instead of "Savage orgy"? That is ''hardly'' a change. Look, the thing is, here in wikipedia, we have to use neutral wording and avoid such language. I'm sure I could find sources that use similar language for the deeds of the Persians during Xerxes' invasion of Greece, for the [[Fall of Constantinople]], for the capture of Jerusalem by the [[First Crusade]] (talk about savage), but as you can see, we don't use such language in those articles. We ''have'' to stick by [[WP:NPOV]] and avoid such colorful language. While authors such as the one you cite are not constrained to do so and can use whatever they see fit, in wikipedia it's different. I've been editing here since 2007, and I know what I'm talking about. Even about the [[Holocaust]] we do not use such language.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm getting the impression that you think the coverage of Alexander in the article is too "positive" and that's why you want to use such language, but that goes completely against the spirit of NPOV. [[WP:NPOV]] is one of the pillars of wikipedia, and we have to abide by it, like it or not.[[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 20:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
4106 +++$+++ Dr. Persi +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ 4104 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.296562020E09 +++$+++ Well it goes both ways, NPOV also entails coverage of both data and I am sure there are a lot of articles or sub articles that such \"language\" on Xerxes with such ease. I get the feeling that we are trying to white wash everything here on Wiki. Let me work on it. I will get back to you.  +++$+++ ::::: Well it goes both ways, NPOV also entails coverage of both data and I am sure there are a lot of articles or sub articles that such "language" on Xerxes with such ease. I get the feeling that we are trying to white wash everything here on Wiki. Let me work on it. I will get back to you. [[User:Dr. Persi|Dr. Persi]] ([[User talk:Dr. Persi|talk]]) 04:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
4107 +++$+++ Dr. Persi +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ 4104 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.296562260E09 +++$+++ Here, look at the page now. Also show me the \"source\" where it shows that Xerxes the Great allowed Persian troops to kill and rape Athenians, then started to kill each other over the spoils ;P (although I am sure you can find a similar source for some other atrocity, as I am sure these old monarchs were all in it). So tell me what you think of this change I made?.  +++$+++ :::::Here, look at the page now. Also show me the "source" where it shows that Xerxes the Great allowed Persian troops to kill and rape Athenians, then started to kill each other over the spoils ;P (although I am sure you can find a similar source for some other atrocity, as I am sure these old monarchs were all in it). So tell me what you think of this change I made?. [[User:Dr. Persi|Dr. Persi]] ([[User talk:Dr. Persi|talk]]) 04:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
4108 +++$+++ Dr. Persi +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ 4104 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.296654960E09 +++$+++ Again, as I said before you have complete authority as I am not well read in Alexander the Great so feel free to go as you wish. I simply hoped to follow in a path that is approved by you. To me it looks fair now but again up to you. Peace.  +++$+++ :::::Again, as I said before you have complete authority as I am not well read in Alexander the Great so feel free to go as you wish. I simply hoped to follow in a path that is approved by you. To me it looks fair now but again up to you. Peace. [[User:Dr. Persi|Dr. Persi]] ([[User talk:Dr. Persi|talk]]) 05:56, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
4109 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.296657420E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I am awfully busy right now, though I did look at your recent changes and they seemed in the right direction. I will think about it a little bit more.  +++$+++ :::::::Thanks. I am awfully busy right now, though I did look at your recent changes and they seemed in the right direction. I will think about it a little bit more. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 06:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
4110 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.297154040E09 +++$+++ After some thought, I removed the whole \"murder and rape\" thing as excessively graphic verbiage that serves no particular purpose other than shock value. Other than that, I think we're ok. Though the article suffers from an overuse of primary sources, the quote from Arrian has merit and I will leave it there.  +++$+++ :::::::After some thought, I removed the whole "murder and rape" thing as excessively graphic verbiage that serves no particular purpose other than shock value. Other than that, I think we're ok. Though the article suffers from an overuse of primary sources, the quote from Arrian has merit and I will leave it there. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 00:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
4111 +++$+++ Dr. Persi +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4099 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.297166220E09 +++$+++ I think this is a mistake on your part, as you will devalue the article, in what I personally believe to be a white washed account. But as you wish. No worries !  +++$+++ ::::::::I think this is a mistake on your part, as you will devalue the article, in what I personally believe to be a white washed account. But as you wish. No worries ! [[User:Dr. Persi|Dr. Persi]] ([[User talk:Dr. Persi|talk]]) 03:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

523879 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 523879 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-04 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.181023140E09 +++$+++ Hi, AnonEMouse. Since I've successfully nominated an article for deletion, I think my next Wiki-step is to try to get a Good Article. I've been improving as many of these Japanese erotic cinema articles as I can for a while now, and still have a lot of work to do on most of them. Several are shaping up fairly well, but it looks to me like [[Hitomi Kobayashi\u200e]] is the one closest to potentially achieving Good Article status. I still need to flesh out information on her earlier career before nominating the article. In the meantime, when you get the chance, could you take a look at the article and give any pointers? (I've been looking for a check-list sort of guideline, but haven't had much luck.) Thanks again.  +++$+++ Hi, AnonEMouse. Since I've successfully nominated an article for deletion, I think my next Wiki-step is to try to get a Good Article. I've been improving as many of these Japanese erotic cinema articles as I can for a while now, and still have a lot of work to do on most of them. Several are shaping up fairly well, but it looks to me like [[Hitomi Kobayashi‎]] is the one closest to potentially achieving Good Article status. I still need to flesh out information on her earlier career before nominating the article. In the meantime, when you get the chance, could you take a look at the article and give any pointers? (I've been looking for a check-list sort of guideline, but haven't had much luck.) Thanks again. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
523880 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 523879 +++$+++ 523879 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.181087820E09 +++$+++ Put it on [[Wikipedia:Peer review]], that's what that's for. (See below note, conveniently enough.) That way you will (possibly) get comments from more than just me. -- +++$+++ : Put it on [[Wikipedia:Peer review]], that's what that's for. (See below note, conveniently enough.) That way you will (possibly) get comments from more than just me. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
523881 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 523879 +++$+++ 523880 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.181090340E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Anon. \"Scanned by the editor from promotional materials\"-- Right. I did that a while ago, and keep meaning to fix it. It's from a catalog put out by the company advertising their videos and novels. I'll get the title and publication info when I can. Kosher, I assume? I'll get to work on the rest later.  +++$+++ :: Thanks, Anon. "Scanned by the editor from promotional materials"-- Right. I did that a while ago, and keep meaning to fix it. It's from a catalog put out by the company advertising their videos and novels. I'll get the title and publication info when I can. Kosher, I assume? I'll get to work on the rest later. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 17:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

266253 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-19 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.169273520E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  The starwood festival article has a mention of Sufis which I had tagged with a citations needed tag.  Rosencomet has suggested that I remove the mention of Sufis together with the tag.  I wish to avoid any friction by editting the article, so please let me know if you have any concerns about me making such a change.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  The starwood festival article has a mention of Sufis which I had tagged with a citations needed tag.  Rosencomet has suggested that I remove the mention of Sufis together with the tag.  I wish to avoid any friction by editting the article, so please let me know if you have any concerns about me making such a change.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
266254 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266253 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.169328060E09 +++$+++ I believe citation #86, the last citation in the Literature section is the concerned citation.The cite was brought in by user:Mlpkr. thanks. +++$+++ ::I believe citation #86, the last citation in the Literature section is the concerned citation.The cite was brought in by user:Mlpkr. thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 13:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
266255 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266253 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.169345640E09 +++$+++ The redlink is put by the Infobox automatically. I made the same mistake before.thanks. +++$+++ ::The redlink is put by the Infobox automatically. I made the same mistake before.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
266256 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266253 +++$+++ 266253 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.169354280E09 +++$+++ ;yes we should focus on odd wordings. Also on the excess linking which has been pointed out.Thanks. +++$+++ :;yes we should focus on odd wordings. Also on the excess linking which has been pointed out.Thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
266257 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266253 +++$+++ 266256 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.169355000E09 +++$+++ I just removed some more. go ahead. If you feel something needs to be added, add it. The place where normally repitions are likely and need removal are names of kings, languages, poets and saints. +++$+++ ::I just removed some more. go ahead. If you feel something needs to be added, add it. The place where normally repitions are likely and need removal are names of kings, languages, poets and saints.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
266258 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266253 +++$+++ 266256 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.169355600E09 +++$+++ ok. +++$+++ ::ok.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
266259 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266253 +++$+++ 266256 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.169362680E09 +++$+++ Inline notes: Can you give an example.thanks. +++$+++ ::Inline notes: Can you give an example.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

528398 +++$+++ GRBerry +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-03 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.215119400E09 +++$+++ You semi-protected [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Ctrl%2BAlt%2BDel] this article on 22 August 2007, citing IP vandalism, BLP problems, and OTRS ticket [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/otrs\/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=1053945 1053945].  An IP editor, who to my eyes looks to be on a stable IP, has [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:John_Carter&curid=9188704&diff=223301065&oldid=223221453 asked] John Carter to unprotect.  It has been almost a year, but given the OTRS ticket, I don't know if there might be greater concerns than those merely visible in the article history.  The page logs show a move vandalism since your semi-protection, and significant edit warring and disputes.  So I don't know if the semi-protection is accomplishing anything either.   +++$+++ You semi-protected [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Ctrl%2BAlt%2BDel] this article on 22 August 2007, citing IP vandalism, BLP problems, and OTRS ticket [https://secure.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=1053945 1053945].  An IP editor, who to my eyes looks to be on a stable IP, has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:John_Carter&curid=9188704&diff=223301065&oldid=223221453 asked] John Carter to unprotect.  It has been almost a year, but given the OTRS ticket, I don't know if there might be greater concerns than those merely visible in the article history.  The page logs show a move vandalism since your semi-protection, and significant edit warring and disputes.  So I don't know if the semi-protection is accomplishing anything either.  [[User:GRBerry|GRBerry]] 14:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
528399 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528398 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-10 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.215726120E09 +++$+++ I've looked at the ticket and decided to unprotect the article. The vandalism complained to at OTRS seems to have come from an individual or small group of individuals, they may have lost interest and moved on in nearly a year. I've watchlisted it and will protect again if heavy vandalism resumes or there are further BLP violations inserted. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::I've looked at the ticket and decided to unprotect the article. The vandalism complained to at OTRS seems to have come from an individual or small group of individuals, they may have lost interest and moved on in nearly a year. I've watchlisted it and will protect again if heavy vandalism resumes or there are further BLP violations inserted. <font face="Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</font> 14:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

524973 +++$+++ Nephron +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-08 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.139460720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Nephron|Nephron]] 20:52, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
524974 +++$+++ Nephron +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-08 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.139461380E09 +++$+++ Is there a way to make the captions '''bolded''' in the infoboxes?  I find bolding makes the text a bit easier to read-- such as in the [[CABG]] article, which has long descriptive captions.  +++$+++ ::Is there a way to make the captions '''bolded''' in the infoboxes?  I find bolding makes the text a bit easier to read-- such as in the [[CABG]] article, which has long descriptive captions. [[User:Nephron|Nephron]] 21:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
524975 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-08 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.139464260E09 +++$+++ Per the footnote issue: I have removed the template for now. I have no objection to alterations to the template. I have left a more detailed response at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy]]. -- +++$+++ :::Per the footnote issue: I have removed the template for now. I have no objection to alterations to the template. I have left a more detailed response at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 21:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
524976 +++$+++ Nephron +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-04 07:53:00 +++$+++ 1.141487580E09 +++$+++ I found a solution to the problem.  There is a more intelligent way to do references.  I fixed the GSV article.  The only question now is-- how do you adjust the size of figure?  I think the figure is way too big.   +++$+++ ::::I found a solution to the problem.  There is a more intelligent way to do references.  I fixed the GSV article.  The only question now is-- how do you adjust the size of figure?  I think the figure is way too big.  [[User:Nephron|Nephron]] 07:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
524977 +++$+++ Nephron +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-04 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.141488360E09 +++$+++ Addendum: I don't understand why the same problem didn't appear in the article on the [[femoral vein]].  This [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Femoral_vein&oldid=38715783 version of the femoral vein article] was basically the same as the GSV article-- yet didn't have the same problem.  Strange.   +++$+++ :::::Addendum: I don't understand why the same problem didn't appear in the article on the [[femoral vein]].  This [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Femoral_vein&oldid=38715783 version of the femoral vein article] was basically the same as the GSV article-- yet didn't have the same problem.  Strange.  [[User:Nephron|Nephron]] 08:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
524978 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-04 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.141508280E09 +++$+++ Thank you for doing the research. There is an optional \"Width\" parameter that can be used to override the default. I have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Great_saphenous_vein&diff=42193446&oldid=42171536 applied it] to [[Great saphenous vein]], choosing '80' for now, but feel free to adjust it as you desire. -- +++$+++ ::::::Thank you for doing the research. There is an optional "Width" parameter that can be used to override the default. I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Great_saphenous_vein&diff=42193446&oldid=42171536 applied it] to [[Great saphenous vein]], choosing '80' for now, but feel free to adjust it as you desire. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 13:38, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

528400 +++$+++ James086 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-10 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.215721260E09 +++$+++ My user ID is 1482496 but surely your number (326) is related to the unified log in. How would I go about finding ID relevant to my account? Cheers, <font face=\"comic sans ms\" color=\"#454545\"> +++$+++ My user ID is 1482496 but surely your number (326) is related to the unified log in. How would I go about finding ID relevant to my account? Cheers, <font face="comic sans ms" color="#454545">[[User:James086|James086]]</font><sup>[[User talk:James086|<font color="#006400">Talk</font>]] &#124; [[Special:Emailuser/James086|<font color="#700000">Email</font>]]</sup> 13:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
528401 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528400 +++$+++ 528400 +++$+++ 2008-07-10 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.215725760E09 +++$+++ Just passing by, hope ^demon won't mind my answering this one... It's 139 according to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/ca.php the list of unified accounts]. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Just passing by, hope ^demon won't mind my answering this one... It's 139 according to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/ca.php the list of unified accounts]. <font face="Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</font> 14:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
528402 +++$+++ James086 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528400 +++$+++ 528401 +++$+++ 2008-07-10 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.215726300E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Wow I must have seen the notice that it was live really early. <font face=\"comic sans ms\" color=\"#454545\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks. Wow I must have seen the notice that it was live really early. <font face="comic sans ms" color="#454545">[[User:James086|James086]]</font><sup>[[User talk:James086|<font color="#006400">Talk</font>]] &#124; [[Special:Emailuser/James086|<font color="#700000">Email</font>]]</sup> 14:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
528403 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528400 +++$+++ 528402 +++$+++ 2008-07-10 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.215727200E09 +++$+++ Probably. The alternative way to end up with a low number is if someone with that ID had their global account deleted - i.e. so they could be renamed locally before bug 13507 was fixed. When that happens, I believe the ID number the now deleted account had is allocated to the next user who unifies their login. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::Probably. The alternative way to end up with a low number is if someone with that ID had their global account deleted - i.e. so they could be renamed locally before bug 13507 was fixed. When that happens, I believe the ID number the now deleted account had is allocated to the next user who unifies their login. <font face="Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</font> 15:00, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
528404 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528400 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.215765120E09 +++$+++ Actually on reflection I may be mistaken - there seem to be missing numbers on the list, which suggests that the IDs of deleted accounts are not reassigned. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::::Actually on reflection I may be mistaken - there seem to be missing numbers on the list, which suggests that the IDs of deleted accounts are not reassigned. <font face="Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</font> 01:32, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

266260 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-20 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.169364660E09 +++$+++ ex: Suryanath U. Kamath, p162. But this I know was not acceptable in a previous review (Hoysala) when they wanted full citation. thanks. +++$+++ ex: Suryanath U. Kamath, p162. But this I know was not acceptable in a previous review (Hoysala) when they wanted full citation. thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
266261 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266260 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.169365440E09 +++$+++ Yes, I have seen theose articles before. Either way, the details have to be given and the size of the article may not change much. Let us wait for what the reviewers have to say so we dont put in lot of work for nothing. I know you mean well, but let us see what the reviewrs say. user:Nichalp is one of the reviewers and highly respected. If he has not commented about the size of the notes, then it may be ok. If he\/they does(do) comment, we can club together several notes where possible and then fine tune the notes.Untill then, lets wait.thanks. +++$+++ ::Yes, I have seen theose articles before. Either way, the details have to be given and the size of the article may not change much. Let us wait for what the reviewers have to say so we dont put in lot of work for nothing. I know you mean well, but let us see what the reviewrs say. user:Nichalp is one of the reviewers and highly respected. If he has not commented about the size of the notes, then it may be ok. If he/they does(do) comment, we can club together several notes where possible and then fine tune the notes.Untill then, lets wait.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
266262 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266260 +++$+++ 266260 +++$+++ 2007-01-21 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.169375040E09 +++$+++ I removed a few more repeat links. +++$+++ :I removed a few more repeat links.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
266263 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266260 +++$+++ 266262 +++$+++ 2007-01-21 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.169413920E09 +++$+++ Every reviewer has his own view. see the FAC discussion. I guess its hard to satisfy everyone 100%.thanks +++$+++ ::Every reviewer has his own view. see the FAC discussion. I guess its hard to satisfy everyone 100%.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 13:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
266264 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266260 +++$+++ 266262 +++$+++ 2007-01-21 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.169433300E09 +++$+++ Yes, Lanka is Sri Lanka. +++$+++ ::Yes, Lanka is Sri Lanka.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
266265 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266260 +++$+++ 266262 +++$+++ 2007-01-21 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.169433720E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you could call it \"present day Sri Lanka\" or put (Sri Lanka) in brackets. +++$+++ ::Perhaps you could call it "present day Sri Lanka" or put (Sri Lanka) in brackets.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

4118 +++$+++ Hxseek +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-04 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.296834300E09 +++$+++ I will take back direct accusations against u if u take back u'r accusation that I need to be blanket banned coz I'm some kind of malicious editor. If I'm fiery, I'll watch this. However, I have a lot to contribute, and am certainly not some kind of phobe-Hellene. Quite the opposite  +++$+++ I will take back direct accusations against u if u take back u'r accusation that I need to be blanket banned coz I'm some kind of malicious editor. If I'm fiery, I'll watch this. However, I have a lot to contribute, and am certainly not some kind of phobe-Hellene. Quite the opposite [[User:Hxseek|Hxseek]] ([[User talk:Hxseek|talk]]) 07:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
4119 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4118 +++$+++ 4118 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.296834720E09 +++$+++ Deal. I had already struck my request that you be topic banned as a gesture of good will, but I now removed it altogether. I understand that you are genuinely interested in the subject and have a lot to contribute, and I also understand you are no \u03b1\u03bd\u03b8\u03ad\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd, and never claimed that you were one, no worries. Peace.  +++$+++ :Deal. I had already struck my request that you be topic banned as a gesture of good will, but I now removed it altogether. I understand that you are genuinely interested in the subject and have a lot to contribute, and I also understand you are no ανθέλλην, and never claimed that you were one, no worries. Peace. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 07:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

88068 +++$+++ Saibo +++$+++ Luk +++$+++ 88068 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-07 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.299498180E09 +++$+++ Hallo Luk,  could you please see at the deleted file and transfer missing info to Commons? The transfer seems to be incomplete. No author, no original source. And please check the license - it was missing too. [[:File:Clark's Sector Model.png]] Cheers -- +++$+++ Hallo Luk,  could you please see at the deleted file and transfer missing info to Commons? The transfer seems to be incomplete. No author, no original source. And please check the license - it was missing too. [[:File:Clark's Sector Model.png]] Cheers --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 03:43, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
88069 +++$+++ Luk +++$+++ Luk +++$+++ 88068 +++$+++ 88068 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.299511740E09 +++$+++ There's not much more there, I've updated the original author, but since it was released under PD, this was not really needed. --  +++$+++ :There's not much more there, I've updated the original author, but since it was released under PD, this was not really needed. -- [[User:Luk|<span style="color:#002BB8;">Luk</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Luk|<span style="color:#FF3300;">talk</span>]]</sup> 07:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
88070 +++$+++ Saibo +++$+++ Luk +++$+++ 88068 +++$+++ 88069 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.299537900E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I have completed the page now. Cheers -- +++$+++ ::Thank you! I have completed the page now. Cheers --[[User:Saibo|Saibo]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Saibo|<small>Δ</small>]]) 14:45, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

4122 +++$+++ Shadowmorph +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-04 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.296835140E09 +++$+++ Greetings! Could you please check the above and possibly write up some better content for that page. Do you think it should stand as an article or is the material (if anything significant is there at all) is already covered in other articles? Thanks.  +++$+++ Greetings! Could you please check the above and possibly write up some better content for that page. Do you think it should stand as an article or is the material (if anything significant is there at all) is already covered in other articles? Thanks. [[User:Shadowmorph|<span style="color:#224222;font-weight:bold">Shadow</span><span style="color:#335533">mor</span><span style="color:#668866">ph</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Shadowmorph|<span style="color:#131313;font-weight:bold">^"^</span>]]</sup> 07:59, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
4123 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4122 +++$+++ 4122 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.296835920E09 +++$+++ Hi, good to see you're still around. I think there is enough material for an article, and I agree the article is in terrible shape at the moment. However, I am currently busy with [[Ancient Macedonians]], which is taking up all my energy. Actually, I was wondering if you would be willing to participate there, there is quite a debate going on. Maybe we can work on Ottoman Macedonia afterwards.  +++$+++ :Hi, good to see you're still around. I think there is enough material for an article, and I agree the article is in terrible shape at the moment. However, I am currently busy with [[Ancient Macedonians]], which is taking up all my energy. Actually, I was wondering if you would be willing to participate there, there is quite a debate going on. Maybe we can work on Ottoman Macedonia afterwards. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 08:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

262831 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262831 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-28 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.198830000E09 +++$+++ Clearly, controversial moves should be undone, and on reviewing the evidence (incl Google search) I completely agree with you on the naming issue. Sorry for the trouble.  +++$+++ Clearly, controversial moves should be undone, and on reviewing the evidence (incl Google search) I completely agree with you on the naming issue. Sorry for the trouble. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 00:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
262832 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262831 +++$+++ 262831 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.198837260E09 +++$+++ I've had a go at sorting out markup for footnotes. Also many (most) of the external links were either direct-links or indirect-mentions of single research papers; I've worked these up where possible, but should they be moved from \"External links\" to \"References\" or better still to relevent place in the artice as footnotes?  +++$+++ :I've had a go at sorting out markup for footnotes. Also many (most) of the external links were either direct-links or indirect-mentions of single research papers; I've worked these up where possible, but should they be moved from "External links" to "References" or better still to relevent place in the artice as footnotes? [[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 02:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

4124 +++$+++ A Macedonian +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4124 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-07 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.297141440E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your brilliant argumentative skills.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your brilliant argumentative skills. [[User:A Macedonian|A Macedonian]] ([[User talk:A Macedonian|talk]]) 21:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
4125 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4124 +++$+++ 4124 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.297145880E09 +++$+++ Thank you, thank you.  +++$+++ :Thank you, thank you. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 22:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
4126 +++$+++ Nipsonanomhmata +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4124 +++$+++ 4125 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.297190340E09 +++$+++ Congrats! Could use them at [[Michael Kefalianos]]. <small> +++$+++ ::Congrats! Could use them at [[Michael Kefalianos]]. <small>[[User:Nipsonanomhmata|<span style="color:white;background:#007">&nbsp;<span style="background:#00c">Nipson</span><span style="background:#00e">anomhmata</span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Nipsonanomhmata|(Talk)]]</sup></small> 10:39, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

266270 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.169606100E09 +++$+++ One thing you could do is to start creating stubs for individual poets, like you did for [[Chamarasa]]. You could pick up names of famous poets from the literature section of [[Hoysala]], [[Western Chalukya]], [[Rashtrakuta]], [[Western Ganga Dynasty]]. Whether you choose to write about Kannada or Sanskrit poets is up to you. When you have made a choise, just let me know and I will tell you if articles for them already exist or not so your effort wont be wasted. This will give me the impetus to expand on your stubs too. How's that sound? thanks. +++$+++ One thing you could do is to start creating stubs for individual poets, like you did for [[Chamarasa]]. You could pick up names of famous poets from the literature section of [[Hoysala]], [[Western Chalukya]], [[Rashtrakuta]], [[Western Ganga Dynasty]]. Whether you choose to write about Kannada or Sanskrit poets is up to you. When you have made a choise, just let me know and I will tell you if articles for them already exist or not so your effort wont be wasted. This will give me the impetus to expand on your stubs too. How's that sound? thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
266271 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266270 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.169614500E09 +++$+++ Try to focus on Kannada poets for now.thanks. +++$+++ ::Try to focus on Kannada poets for now.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:55, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
266272 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266270 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.169615460E09 +++$+++ I assumed you would go into the sub article like [[Hoysala literature]] where it is clearly marked '''Kannada''' or '''Sanskrit'''. +++$+++ ::I assumed you would go into the sub article like [[Hoysala literature]] where it is clearly marked '''Kannada''' or '''Sanskrit'''.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

4127 +++$+++ Alexikoua +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-09 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.297292820E09 +++$+++ Guess who is socking? I had from the very start suspicion that he might be but now it's more than obvious that he wants to finish his unfinished job as Sulmues (for example nominating for ga article the previous account had a great desire make, and delisting ga articles his previous account didn't like) +++$+++ Guess who is socking? I had from the very start suspicion that he might be but now it's more than obvious that he wants to finish his unfinished job as Sulmues (for example nominating for ga article the previous account had a great desire make, and delisting ga articles his previous account didn't like)[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 15:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
4128 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4127 +++$+++ 4127 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.297310220E09 +++$+++ Indeed. But his confidence leads me to suspect that he has done some gimmick with the IPs and thinks he is safe from CU (I'm guessing he changed geolocation, that's why he's doing this). Gather as much evidence as you can, but be careful not to post it on-wiki until the right time, per [[WP:BEANS]].  +++$+++ :Indeed. But his confidence leads me to suspect that he has done some gimmick with the IPs and thinks he is safe from CU (I'm guessing he changed geolocation, that's why he's doing this). Gather as much evidence as you can, but be careful not to post it on-wiki until the right time, per [[WP:BEANS]]. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 19:57, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
4129 +++$+++ Alexikoua +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4127 +++$+++ 4128 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.297379040E09 +++$+++ Take also into account that the 'retired' tag was Sulmue's favorite strategy when he witness a  'defeat in his national povs'. +++$+++ ::Take also into account that the 'retired' tag was Sulmue's favorite strategy when he witness a  'defeat in his national povs'.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 15:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

266273 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.169615520E09 +++$+++ Also, names in Italics are the names of literary writings.thanks. +++$+++ Also, names in Italics are the names of literary writings.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
266274 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.169621100E09 +++$+++ Why dont you just throw at me what you think are names of scholars and I shall validate or invalidate.thanks +++$+++ ::Why dont you just throw at me what you think are names of scholars and I shall validate or invalidate.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
266275 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.169628420E09 +++$+++ Can you work on Nagavarma I and Nagavarma II. I am especially interested in the later, a great poet. You will find him mentionde in [[Western Chalukya literature]].thanks +++$+++ ::Can you work on Nagavarma I and Nagavarma II. I am especially interested in the later, a great poet. You will find him mentionde in [[Western Chalukya literature]].thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
266276 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.169632800E09 +++$+++ Nothing in particular. The more info you can add, like the job you did on [[Banavasi]], always helps. +++$+++ ::Nothing in particular. The more info you can add, like the job you did on [[Banavasi]], always helps.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
266277 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.169638020E09 +++$+++ Just explain each temple in the town article itself with as much info as possible. We can later add images for each if available. This place as a \"whole\" is interesting, but each temple indivudually is not that famous. I dont think I will be able to write as much about these temples as I did for [[Chennakesava Temple]] & [[Hoysaleaswara temple]] etc. Try to write up on the sand dunes also. I may have some images in my albums. +++$+++ ::Just explain each temple in the town article itself with as much info as possible. We can later add images for each if available. This place as a "whole" is interesting, but each temple indivudually is not that famous. I dont think I will be able to write as much about these temples as I did for [[Chennakesava Temple]] & [[Hoysaleaswara temple]] etc. Try to write up on the sand dunes also. I may have some images in my albums.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:27, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
266278 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.169685240E09 +++$+++ Thanks.I will think of something by afternoon.thanks +++$+++ ::Thanks.I will think of something by afternoon.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 16:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
266279 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.169698920E09 +++$+++ Hi. Do you want to work on Kannada Mathematician Rajaditya  (citation #7 on [[Hoysala literature]] page). The reason I am emphasising on building Kannada poets database is because sometime in the future I want to work on Kannada literature page. There I want to touch upon all these topics and scholars.thanks. +++$+++ ::Hi. Do you want to work on Kannada Mathematician Rajaditya  (citation #7 on [[Hoysala literature]] page). The reason I am emphasising on building Kannada poets database is because sometime in the future I want to work on Kannada literature page. There I want to touch upon all these topics and scholars.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
266280 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.169699520E09 +++$+++ look at [http:\/\/www.ourkarnataka.com\/history.htm] at do a search there. +++$+++ ::look at [http://www.ourkarnataka.com/history.htm] at do a search there.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
266281 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.169709300E09 +++$+++ Do you want to start a page for Chitradurga Fort. If you do rad up on [[Chitradurga district]] [[Nayakas of Chitradurga]] to get a background. I plan to visit the fort this year and expand on the article. +++$+++ ::Do you want to start a page for Chitradurga Fort. If you do rad up on [[Chitradurga district]] [[Nayakas of Chitradurga]] to get a background. I plan to visit the fort this year and expand on the article.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
266282 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.169722140E09 +++$+++ is you email ok now.? +++$+++ ::is you email ok now.?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
266283 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.169724720E09 +++$+++ looks like it. +++$+++ ::looks like it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:32, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
266284 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.169792700E09 +++$+++ I saw it. still ways to go.thanks. +++$+++ ::I saw it. still ways to go.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
266285 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.169796240E09 +++$+++ . No, I meant untill Raul signs it of as FA, its not a FA. Though I dont see a reason for it not to be. +++$+++ ::. No, I meant untill Raul signs it of as FA, its not a FA. Though I dont see a reason for it not to be.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
266286 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.169844600E09 +++$+++ We can address some of the issues in the FAC discussion by latest reviewer. One thing that will be difficult to address is the creation of new subheadings he mentioned. +++$+++ ::We can address some of the issues in the FAC discussion by latest reviewer. One thing that will be difficult to address is the creation of new subheadings he mentioned.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 12:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
266287 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.169845620E09 +++$+++ I have replied on the FAC discussion. Please take a look. Yes we should not change the subheadings now unless absolutely necessary.thanks. +++$+++ ::I have replied on the FAC discussion. Please take a look. Yes we should not change the subheadings now unless absolutely necessary.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 13:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
266288 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.169852040E09 +++$+++ Yes, fits in well in the [[Ancient City of Vijayanagara]] article along with the \"naga worship\" image at the bottom or some where on that page. What do you think. Generally, these reliefs are very commonly found in many Hindu temples (not trying to discourage you). +++$+++ ::Yes, fits in well in the [[Ancient City of Vijayanagara]] article along with the "naga worship" image at the bottom or some where on that page. What do you think. Generally, these reliefs are very commonly found in many Hindu temples (not trying to discourage you).[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 14:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
266289 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.169856180E09 +++$+++ Take a look at [[Keladi Nayaka]]. These are also Vijayanagara era reliefs and the image is clearer (apart from the fact that I took the photograph:)).thanks. +++$+++ ::Take a look at [[Keladi Nayaka]]. These are also Vijayanagara era reliefs and the image is clearer (apart from the fact that I took the photograph:)).thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 16:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
266290 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.169857620E09 +++$+++ I can look in my albums. Anyway, the parrot image should give them the idea, I think. +++$+++ ::I can look in my albums. Anyway, the parrot image should give them the idea, I think.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 16:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
266291 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.169869620E09 +++$+++ In the Talakad page, the location of Talakad on the map is approximately 1500Kms off from excat location!!!. It should be in southern Karnataka, more specifically in [[Mysore district]].thanks. +++$+++ ::In the Talakad page, the location of Talakad on the map is approximately 1500Kms off from excat location!!!. It should be in southern Karnataka, more specifically in [[Mysore district]].thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
266292 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.169869920E09 +++$+++ I have corrected the location more or less. +++$+++ ::I have corrected the location more or less.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
266293 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.169876400E09 +++$+++ sorry for what? Not an issue at all.thanks. +++$+++ ::sorry for what? Not an issue at all.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
266294 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-27 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.169896440E09 +++$+++ Have you seen the Vijayanagara FAC discussion. We got an \"oppose\". One reviewer does not like the citation format, just like you had talked about. But then, this was the format adviced in other FA's. +++$+++ ::Have you seen the Vijayanagara FAC discussion. We got an "oppose". One reviewer does not like the citation format, just like you had talked about. But then, this was the format adviced in other FA's.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
266295 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-27 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.169907480E09 +++$+++ This reviewer's concern has been with the format of the citations only (other than the image issue). But  many of the reviewers are not Indians and this format has been accepted by some tough reviewrs like Tony1 who prescribed it. Please read the discussion page for my explanation.So now what. How will Raul react to this is the issue. +++$+++ ::This reviewer's concern has been with the format of the citations only (other than the image issue). But  many of the reviewers are not Indians and this format has been accepted by some tough reviewrs like Tony1 who prescribed it. Please read the discussion page for my explanation.So now what. How will Raul react to this is the issue.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 06:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
266296 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266273 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-27 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.169908020E09 +++$+++ See the latest remarks he has posted on the FAC discussion. Clearly his own views on citations.We need to treat carefully now. I will contact some of the reviewers. +++$+++ ::See the latest remarks he has posted on the FAC discussion. Clearly his own views on citations.We need to treat carefully now. I will contact some of the reviewers.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 06:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

4131 +++$+++ Alexikoua +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4131 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-06 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.299483900E09 +++$+++ Since you have participated in this discussion there is a new debate there. It appears that user Zjarri. doesn't consider you an 'experienced editor' since he collectivelly called a number of editors to participate. +++$+++ Since you have participated in this discussion there is a new debate there. It appears that user Zjarri. doesn't consider you an 'experienced editor' since he collectivelly called a number of editors to participate.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 23:45, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
4132 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4131 +++$+++ 4131 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.299655860E09 +++$+++ It is a partial revert, and as such it is a clear cut violation of your revert parole. That much is beyond doubt. I also also don't agree with the removal of the content itself, as the PCT isn't the only inscription in Macedonian. As the Companion makes clear, there are several other fragmentary inscriptions, though the PCT is so far the only substantial inscription.  +++$+++ :It is a partial revert, and as such it is a clear cut violation of your revert parole. That much is beyond doubt. I also also don't agree with the removal of the content itself, as the PCT isn't the only inscription in Macedonian. As the Companion makes clear, there are several other fragmentary inscriptions, though the PCT is so far the only substantial inscription. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 23:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
4133 +++$+++ Slovenski Volk +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4131 +++$+++ 4132 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.299669960E09 +++$+++ That's fine, I can put it back in; athough the content is already covered.   +++$+++ ::That's fine, I can put it back in; athough the content is already covered.  [[User:Slovenski Volk|Slovenski Volk]] ([[User talk:Slovenski Volk|talk]]) 03:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
4134 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4131 +++$+++ 4133 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.299682140E09 +++$+++ Well, are you going to, or not?  +++$+++ :::Well, are you going to, or not? [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 06:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
4135 +++$+++ Slovenski Volk +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4131 +++$+++ 4134 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.299689160E09 +++$+++ settle down, its done (I am a surgeon, you know, outside Wikiworld). Yep, it's put back in. I just split Borza's part in two. The part on inscriptions follows were it was originally, the part on \"the majority f words are Greek\" occurs couple lines later, in the lexical discussion.  +++$+++ ::::settle down, its done (I am a surgeon, you know, outside Wikiworld). Yep, it's put back in. I just split Borza's part in two. The part on inscriptions follows were it was originally, the part on "the majority f words are Greek" occurs couple lines later, in the lexical discussion. [[User:Slovenski Volk|Slovenski Volk]] ([[User talk:Slovenski Volk|talk]]) 08:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
4136 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4131 +++$+++ 4135 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.299764460E09 +++$+++ Then maybe you should focus more on your surgeries than on wikipedia stuff. God knows your patients would appreciate it :)  +++$+++ :::::Then maybe you should focus more on your surgeries than on wikipedia stuff. God knows your patients would appreciate it :) [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 05:41, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
4137 +++$+++ Slovenski Volk +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4131 +++$+++ 4136 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.299780300E09 +++$+++ I have't killed anyone, yet. I think the language paragraph has shaped up OK. Next i hope to add the stuff on lifestyle, which I earlier presented on the talk page, and will edit in the few points you brought up on it.  +++$+++ ::::::I have't killed anyone, yet. I think the language paragraph has shaped up OK. Next i hope to add the stuff on lifestyle, which I earlier presented on the talk page, and will edit in the few points you brought up on it. [[User:Slovenski Volk|Slovenski Volk]] ([[User talk:Slovenski Volk|talk]]) 10:05, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

528420 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-28 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.225218060E09 +++$+++ Could you help point me in the correct direction. As, '''Joewurzelbacher2010''' has been deleted (while I was in the process of writing the article), do you know where I may get a copy of the article that was partly constructed (the copy that was deleted) so that I may work on it to complete it and then resubmit it in the future when it is ready? Thanks.  +++$+++ Could you help point me in the correct direction. As, '''Joewurzelbacher2010''' has been deleted (while I was in the process of writing the article), do you know where I may get a copy of the article that was partly constructed (the copy that was deleted) so that I may work on it to complete it and then resubmit it in the future when it is ready? Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism|talk]]) 11:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
528421 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528420 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.225274940E09 +++$+++ Demon, Ism asked my help on this. Under what provision of WP:CSD did you delete it? Not t hat I think it would make a good article by itself, but I can see no relevant possible provision of speedy. A7-web was the latest tag placed on it--but it is not web content, in any sense I understand the term. It's a political campaign. I really think you should simply restore it, and then either propose a merge or send it to AfD, or persuade the ed. to withdraw it.  Iwill of course userify it for him if you do not, but I hink this was a misuse of speedy.  ''' +++$+++ ::Demon, Ism asked my help on this. Under what provision of WP:CSD did you delete it? Not t hat I think it would make a good article by itself, but I can see no relevant possible provision of speedy. A7-web was the latest tag placed on it--but it is not web content, in any sense I understand the term. It's a political campaign. I really think you should simply restore it, and then either propose a merge or send it to AfD, or persuade the ed. to withdraw it.  Iwill of course userify it for him if you do not, but I hink this was a misuse of speedy.  '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 03:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

555867 +++$+++ Skipsievert +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ 555867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-30 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.238459400E09 +++$+++ Was that really the best way to comment or communicate with a fellow editor, on the talk page of an article? If you look at the article history you will see that I have made some good edits and multiple edits of reffing and citing information. I brought up an aspect of the editing on the talk page of a team member having linked his own book in the article. I felt this should have been brought up. Please calm down.  +++$+++ Was that really the best way to comment or communicate with a fellow editor, on the talk page of an article? If you look at the article history you will see that I have made some good edits and multiple edits of reffing and citing information. I brought up an aspect of the editing on the talk page of a team member having linked his own book in the article. I felt this should have been brought up. Please calm down. [[User:Skipsievert|skip sievert]] ([[User talk:Skipsievert|talk]]) 17:30, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
555868 +++$+++ Skipsievert +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ 555867 +++$+++ 555867 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.238472540E09 +++$+++ I think you are way to personally involved in the ''team'' on the page... and also as a personal editing partner with members of the team (Sunray in particular) to make the statement you made, which I found personally insulting, demeaning and not appropriate. I have done a lot of grunt work on that article. My talk page also requests that conversations started elsewhere be done where started. I feel that you are baiting me with the last communication. Please stop. Please take such disputes if you feel they are disputes to requests for comment, requests for mediation, or requests for arbitration.   +++$+++ :I think you are way to personally involved in the ''team'' on the page... and also as a personal editing partner with members of the team (Sunray in particular) to make the statement you made, which I found personally insulting, demeaning and not appropriate. I have done a lot of grunt work on that article. My talk page also requests that conversations started elsewhere be done where started. I feel that you are baiting me with the last communication. Please stop. Please take such disputes if you feel they are disputes to requests for comment, requests for mediation, or requests for arbitration.  [[User:Skipsievert|skip sievert]] ([[User talk:Skipsievert|talk]]) 21:09, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

4138 +++$+++ Slovenski Volk +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4138 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-12 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.299962340E09 +++$+++ Hold on a sec, Athenean. I think you are out of line by calling my addition that \"Masson and Dubois interpreted\" the PCT as NW Greek as \"hedging\". Firstly, check your definition of what hedging is. There is no subvertive undertone in my addition, it is merely representing fact. ''Masson'' and ''Dubois'' interpreted the PCT as NW Greek. As you know, the PCT does not possess anything about it which makes it's categorization as NW Greek unequivocal. In fact, it has all the somewhat discordant features that certain of the glosses and names do. That is why that even after its dicovery, a concensus is lacking. Thus to insist that on leaving the sentence as it stands is a misrepresentation of the situation and what the sources say about it. I think you have been rather fair and reasonable so far, and I don't want to halt the progress we are slowly making, however, we need to represent the sources truthfully, and as an educated editor, you should agree with. I ''do'' accept edits of yours which are fair enough {eg I agree that my addition of Hall's reflection on the matter is perhaps unneccessary}  +++$+++ Hold on a sec, Athenean. I think you are out of line by calling my addition that "Masson and Dubois interpreted" the PCT as NW Greek as "hedging". Firstly, check your definition of what hedging is. There is no subvertive undertone in my addition, it is merely representing fact. ''Masson'' and ''Dubois'' interpreted the PCT as NW Greek. As you know, the PCT does not possess anything about it which makes it's categorization as NW Greek unequivocal. In fact, it has all the somewhat discordant features that certain of the glosses and names do. That is why that even after its dicovery, a concensus is lacking. Thus to insist that on leaving the sentence as it stands is a misrepresentation of the situation and what the sources say about it. I think you have been rather fair and reasonable so far, and I don't want to halt the progress we are slowly making, however, we need to represent the sources truthfully, and as an educated editor, you should agree with. I ''do'' accept edits of yours which are fair enough {eg I agree that my addition of Hall's reflection on the matter is perhaps unneccessary} [[User:Slovenski Volk|Slovenski Volk]] ([[User talk:Slovenski Volk|talk]]) 12:39, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
4139 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4138 +++$+++ 4138 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.300006260E09 +++$+++ On second thought, none of the other claims in the article are similarly hedged. Nor are they attributed to specific authors (\"X says\", \"According to Y and Z\"), so I don't see why that should be the case for the PCT. In general, I am against dropping names of authors in the main text, as it assumes our readers know who they are and is somewhat esoteric. Now, that the language of the tablet is a form of Greek is beyond doubt. I can practically understand all of it (as could any reasonably educated fluent Greek speaker), and I don't speak a word of Illyrian, Thracian, or Brygian. What needs to be hedged, and is suitably hedged is that ''because'' the language of the tablet is NW, that XMK is NW Greek. Now ''that'' should be hedged, and it is (\"the tablet has been '''used to support the argument''' that XMK was NW Greek\"). However, that the language of the tablet is a form of Greek is beyond dispute. I have yet to see a source that says otherwise.  +++$+++ :On second thought, none of the other claims in the article are similarly hedged. Nor are they attributed to specific authors ("X says", "According to Y and Z"), so I don't see why that should be the case for the PCT. In general, I am against dropping names of authors in the main text, as it assumes our readers know who they are and is somewhat esoteric. Now, that the language of the tablet is a form of Greek is beyond doubt. I can practically understand all of it (as could any reasonably educated fluent Greek speaker), and I don't speak a word of Illyrian, Thracian, or Brygian. What needs to be hedged, and is suitably hedged is that ''because'' the language of the tablet is NW, that XMK is NW Greek. Now ''that'' should be hedged, and it is ("the tablet has been '''used to support the argument''' that XMK was NW Greek"). However, that the language of the tablet is a form of Greek is beyond dispute. I have yet to see a source that says otherwise. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 00:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
4140 +++$+++ Slovenski Volk +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4138 +++$+++ 4139 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.300084440E09 +++$+++ No, that's fine. I accept that. It's quite interesting you can basically understand all of it  +++$+++ ::No, that's fine. I accept that. It's quite interesting you can basically understand all of it [[User:Slovenski Volk|Slovenski Volk]] ([[User talk:Slovenski Volk|talk]]) 23:34, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

506422 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-15 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.295146920E09 +++$+++ The next item I intend to start updating is [[Portal:United States]] if anyone is interested in helping. Again this is not specific to WPUS and any help would be greatly appreciated to maximize visibility of US topics. The foundation has already been established its just a matter of updating the content with some new images, biographies and articles. Please let leave a comment on the Portals talk page or let me know if you have any questions or ideas. -- +++$+++ The next item I intend to start updating is [[Portal:United States]] if anyone is interested in helping. Again this is not specific to WPUS and any help would be greatly appreciated to maximize visibility of US topics. The foundation has already been established its just a matter of updating the content with some new images, biographies and articles. Please let leave a comment on the Portals talk page or let me know if you have any questions or ideas. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 19:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
506423 +++$+++ Funandtrvl +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506422 +++$+++ 506422 +++$+++ 2011-01-17 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.295273100E09 +++$+++ Hi-Thank you for the barnstar!! I've created a new category just for the USA portal's pages, see: [[:Category:United States portal]]. I tried to tag as many pages as possible within the category (they need to be within noinclude tags on a portal subpage). However, there are a lot of subpages out there, see: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixIndex&prefix=United+States%2F&namespace=100]. I'm not sure at this point whether they work with the portal box skeleton template and the random subpages template or not, so will continue to sort it out! -- +++$+++ :Hi-Thank you for the barnstar!! I've created a new category just for the USA portal's pages, see: [[:Category:United States portal]]. I tried to tag as many pages as possible within the category (they need to be within noinclude tags on a portal subpage). However, there are a lot of subpages out there, see: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixIndex&prefix=United+States%2F&namespace=100]. I'm not sure at this point whether they work with the portal box skeleton template and the random subpages template or not, so will continue to sort it out! --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 06:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
506424 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506422 +++$+++ 506423 +++$+++ 2011-01-17 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.295337000E09 +++$+++ Your welcome, Ok sounds good thanks for letting me know. -- +++$+++ ::Your welcome, Ok sounds good thanks for letting me know. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 23:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

528428 +++$+++ D-Kuru +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-20 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.227231540E09 +++$+++ You have deleted [[:Image:M109BREECH.JPG]], because it was available on Commons. Please [[Commons:User talk:D-Kuru|tell me]] if the licence was GFDL with or without disclaimers. <br>Thanks -- +++$+++ You have deleted [[:Image:M109BREECH.JPG]], because it was available on Commons. Please [[Commons:User talk:D-Kuru|tell me]] if the licence was GFDL with or without disclaimers. <br>Thanks --[[User:D-Kuru|D-Kuru]] ([[User talk:D-Kuru|talk]]) 17:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
528429 +++$+++ D-Kuru +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528428 +++$+++ 528428 +++$+++ 2008-11-20 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.227234180E09 +++$+++ Thanks -- +++$+++ : Thanks --[[User:D-Kuru|D-Kuru]] ([[User talk:D-Kuru|talk]]) 18:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

4142 +++$+++ Seb_az86556 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-09 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.299709380E09 +++$+++ The section you started is now apparently treated as a majority-wins vote...  +++$+++ The section you started is now apparently treated as a majority-wins vote... [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] <sup>[[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]]</sup> 14:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
4143 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4142 +++$+++ 4142 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.299727140E09 +++$+++ Diren Yardimli will be reported for edit-warring. It is the only way to deal with the situation.  +++$+++ :Diren Yardimli will be reported for edit-warring. It is the only way to deal with the situation. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 19:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
4144 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4142 +++$+++ 4142 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.299728880E09 +++$+++ Done [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Edit_warring#User:Diren_Yardimli_reported_by_User:Athenean_.28Result:_.29]. Feel free to pitch in.  +++$+++ :Done [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Diren_Yardimli_reported_by_User:Athenean_.28Result:_.29]. Feel free to pitch in. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 19:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
4145 +++$+++ Seb_az86556 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4142 +++$+++ 4144 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.299731400E09 +++$+++ Thanks; I'd rather not since I am obviously Armenian... the only Navajo-speaking one to boot. Talk about seeing ghosts.  +++$+++ ::Thanks; I'd rather not since I am obviously Armenian... the only Navajo-speaking one to boot. Talk about seeing ghosts. [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] <sup>[[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]]</sup> 20:30, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
4146 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4142 +++$+++ 4145 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.299736140E09 +++$+++ He got blocked, so be on the lookout for socks. And thanks for all the help.  +++$+++ :::He got blocked, so be on the lookout for socks. And thanks for all the help. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 21:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

4149 +++$+++ Kavas +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.300410960E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Cupcaker is http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Confederatre.  +++$+++ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cupcaker is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Confederatre. [[User:Kavas|Kavas]] ([[User talk:Kavas|talk]]) 18:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
4150 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4149 +++$+++ 4149 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.300411020E09 +++$+++ Indeed. You should file a [[WP:SPI]], or else post on [[WP:AN\/I]] since this case is quite obvious. I can't take any action myself, I am not an administrator.  +++$+++ :Indeed. You should file a [[WP:SPI]], or else post on [[WP:AN/I]] since this case is quite obvious. I can't take any action myself, I am not an administrator. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 18:17, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

4154 +++$+++ Dr. Persi +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-22 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.300787520E09 +++$+++ Happy Nowruz man! I am sure you do not celebrate but accept this as a celebatory gesture nontheless. Hope you and your loved ones have a great and fruitful year!  +++$+++ Happy Nowruz man! I am sure you do not celebrate but accept this as a celebatory gesture nontheless. Hope you and your loved ones have a great and fruitful year! [[User:Dr. Persi|Dr. Persi]] ([[User talk:Dr. Persi|talk]]) 02:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
4155 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4154 +++$+++ 4154 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.300870500E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much my friend, all the best to you too.  +++$+++ :Thank you very much my friend, all the best to you too. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 01:55, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

266299 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266299 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-02 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.170476100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJkelly&diff=105167636&oldid=105150365 the note].  If you haven't yet, it is definitely worthwhile to read [http:\/\/ragesossscholar.blogspot.com\/2006\/08\/on-wikipedia-burnout-and-hostility.html ragesoss]' reponse to, and elabouration upon, my thinking.  +++$+++ Thanks for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJkelly&diff=105167636&oldid=105150365 the note].  If you haven't yet, it is definitely worthwhile to read [http://ragesossscholar.blogspot.com/2006/08/on-wikipedia-burnout-and-hostility.html ragesoss]' reponse to, and elabouration upon, my thinking. [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 20:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
266300 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266299 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.170570600E09 +++$+++ You reorg is fine. sorry I was out for a while. The only reason I mentioned that names of individual artists were not mentoined was to stress on the existance of corporate business and not individual enterprise.thanks. +++$+++ ::You reorg is fine. sorry I was out for a while. The only reason I mentioned that names of individual artists were not mentoined was to stress on the existance of corporate business and not individual enterprise.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
266301 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266299 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.170571500E09 +++$+++ Banditry? We all know about \"Bandit Queen\" of central India!! (she is no more ofcourse) +++$+++ ::Banditry? We all know about "Bandit Queen" of central India!! (she is no more ofcourse)[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:45, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
266302 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266299 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.170571800E09 +++$+++ outlaw is good enough I think? +++$+++ ::outlaw is good enough I think?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

4157 +++$+++ Ncmvocalist +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-31 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.301580300E09 +++$+++ This is to notify you (as you are a participant in the above ANI) that I've made several restriction proposals at this discussion which you may wish to comment on.  +++$+++ This is to notify you (as you are a participant in the above ANI) that I've made several restriction proposals at this discussion which you may wish to comment on. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 07:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
4158 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4157 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-05 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.302041880E09 +++$+++ Please participate in the discussion on [[Talk: List of South Asian inventions and discoveries]].   +++$+++ :::Please participate in the discussion on [[Talk: List of South Asian inventions and discoveries]].  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 15:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

266304 +++$+++ Zuejay +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-04 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.170576540E09 +++$+++ [[Embankment dam]]s are all ready discussed in the article on [[dam]]s. With your consent, I'd like to create a redirect for this topic to that section of the Dam article. Let me know. Thanks, -- +++$+++ [[Embankment dam]]s are all ready discussed in the article on [[dam]]s. With your consent, I'd like to create a redirect for this topic to that section of the Dam article. Let me know. Thanks, --[[User:Zuejay|Zuejay]] 00:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
266305 +++$+++ Zuejay +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266304 +++$+++ 266304 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.170580200E09 +++$+++ Indeed, folks' lack of knowledge of certain topics can be very frustrating - I get particularly frustrated with the disambiguous description of [[embankment]] that's wants me to look at the article on [[slope]] which is really mostly just math, not engineering; however, since I don't have time to fix it right now, I just deal with it. <br> Perhaps, since you have extensive knowledge of dams, you can work to refine the dam article? If the embankment dam article is expanded beyond stub status, it can certainly remain. How about...hmmm... I'll add a note in the embankment dam section of the dam article that directs the user to the 'Main' embankment dam article? That should work for now, but the embankment dam article really will need to be expanded beyond stub status. <br> -- +++$+++ :Indeed, folks' lack of knowledge of certain topics can be very frustrating - I get particularly frustrated with the disambiguous description of [[embankment]] that's wants me to look at the article on [[slope]] which is really mostly just math, not engineering; however, since I don't have time to fix it right now, I just deal with it. <br> Perhaps, since you have extensive knowledge of dams, you can work to refine the dam article? If the embankment dam article is expanded beyond stub status, it can certainly remain. How about...hmmm... I'll add a note in the embankment dam section of the dam article that directs the user to the 'Main' embankment dam article? That should work for now, but the embankment dam article really will need to be expanded beyond stub status. <br> --[[User:Zuejay|Zuejay]] 01:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

4162 +++$+++ Antidiskriminator +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4162 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-07 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.304783340E09 +++$+++ Hi. I am curious if you know what happened to Sulmues. He was very active in editing certain articles and then suddenly disappeared. What do you think about it?-- +++$+++ Hi. I am curious if you know what happened to Sulmues. He was very active in editing certain articles and then suddenly disappeared. What do you think about it?--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 08:49, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
4163 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4162 +++$+++ 4162 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.306587060E09 +++$+++ Yes. Fairly obvious who this \"Doktor Plumbi\" is. Have a look here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/Sulmuesi#28_May_2011].  +++$+++ :Yes. Fairly obvious who this "Doktor Plumbi" is. Have a look here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sulmuesi#28_May_2011]. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 05:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
4164 +++$+++ Antidiskriminator +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4162 +++$+++ 4163 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.306630500E09 +++$+++ I looked at that SPI and decided to save a link to it on my userpage because I realised I might find it useful. Keep up a good work!-- +++$+++ :: I looked at that SPI and decided to save a link to it on my userpage because I realised I might find it useful. Keep up a good work!--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 17:55, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
4165 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4162 +++$+++ 4164 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.306632840E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Yes, you should study the SPI to see how it is done, because it is likely to be necessary again in the future (although it will get easier and easier with each instance of socking). You study the contribs of both accounts, and present the evidence succinctly (say, less than 50 diffs) and professionally (no name calling or anything like that), in a clear and organized manner, then sit back and let the admins do their job.  +++$+++ :::Thank you. Yes, you should study the SPI to see how it is done, because it is likely to be necessary again in the future (although it will get easier and easier with each instance of socking). You study the contribs of both accounts, and present the evidence succinctly (say, less than 50 diffs) and professionally (no name calling or anything like that), in a clear and organized manner, then sit back and let the admins do their job. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 18:34, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

266307 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266307 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-04 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.170578640E09 +++$+++ Western Chalukya \"economy\" looks good now. I need to add a couple of images. I have one for wall relief with women in dancing poses that looks good. +++$+++ Western Chalukya "economy" looks good now. I need to add a couple of images. I have one for wall relief with women in dancing poses that looks good.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
266308 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266307 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.170582180E09 +++$+++ All the reference you have used also points to Tamil websites or books about Tamils. This may have pointed the person to call them Tamil, while it may generally mean South Indian merchants. Neither of my two sources (Sastri or Thapar, p384) specifically give a language designation, but simply South Indian merchants. +++$+++ ::All the reference you have used also points to Tamil websites or books about Tamils. This may have pointed the person to call them Tamil, while it may generally mean South Indian merchants. Neither of my two sources (Sastri or Thapar, p384) specifically give a language designation, but simply South Indian merchants.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
266309 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266307 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.170643860E09 +++$+++ The article says they are now Tamil speaking. It does not mean they spoke Tamil in 9th century. People have moved around a lot in the last 1000 years, so I think we should keep language out of the article. My books clearly says they were from [[Aihole]] during the Chalukya times. Aihole is very much in north Karnataka. +++$+++ ::The article says they are now Tamil speaking. It does not mean they spoke Tamil in 9th century. People have moved around a lot in the last 1000 years, so I think we should keep language out of the article. My books clearly says they were from [[Aihole]] during the Chalukya times. Aihole is very much in north Karnataka.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
266310 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266307 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.170644520E09 +++$+++ I have removed the [[Dhangar]] link you added to Heggadde in Economy. My book says \"inscriptions from karnataka\" while mentioning Heggadde. Also Heggadde's are generally in coastal Karnataka even today while Dhangar's seemed to be located  mostly in Maharashtra. Just to avoid confusion over castes etc.Not your fault. +++$+++ ::I have removed the [[Dhangar]] link you added to Heggadde in Economy. My book says "inscriptions from karnataka" while mentioning Heggadde. Also Heggadde's are generally in coastal Karnataka even today while Dhangar's seemed to be located  mostly in Maharashtra. Just to avoid confusion over castes etc.Not your fault.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
266311 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266307 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.170644700E09 +++$+++ I just completed a page on [[Rashtrakuta literature]]. Whatever little copyedit will do fine, given the nature of the contents.thanks +++$+++ ::I just completed a page on [[Rashtrakuta literature]]. Whatever little copyedit will do fine, given the nature of the contents.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
266312 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266307 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.170646080E09 +++$+++ I replied by email.thanks. +++$+++ ::I replied by email.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
266313 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266307 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.170719340E09 +++$+++ I have made a few changes to some of those merchant guild links. The more general we keep it, the better. The one that points to Kerela Jews is interesting. +++$+++ ::I have made a few changes to some of those merchant guild links. The more general we keep it, the better. The one that points to Kerela Jews is interesting.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
266314 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266307 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.170723720E09 +++$+++ I remember reading that oxen were used for land trade. Whole sale or hawked meant both locally and overseas, through contacts I suppose. I have not read of elephants being used to carry trade goods, though it is well known they were used for pulling lumber to rivers edge (I come from the state that has the highest elephant population-Karnataka). +++$+++ ::I remember reading that oxen were used for land trade. Whole sale or hawked meant both locally and overseas, through contacts I suppose. I have not read of elephants being used to carry trade goods, though it is well known they were used for pulling lumber to rivers edge (I come from the state that has the highest elephant population-Karnataka).[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

528457 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-11 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.142144340E09 +++$+++ Hi Schzmo - depends a bit on the degree of dispute; there's no real such thing as a single most accurate source for species; different researchers will always have different, so it is best to check what several sources say. Species that are fairly widely accepted with only a few dissenting voices, give them a page, while those where there are fewer who accept, discuss them as a paragraph under the page of the species in which they tend to get synonymised with (see e.g. ''Juniperus deltoides'' under ''[[Juniperus oxycedrus]]''). Check up on what trends there are in recent literature (if you have access to it!) to see which way opinions are going (e.g. ''Pinus washoensis'', widely regarded a valid species until about 10 years ago, is now largely dismissed as an inconsequential variant of ''P. ponderosa''; conversely, recent authors are increasingly accepting a larger number of pinyon species). Or try to judge for yourself which opinion appears the more realistic. I guess the other option is to leave them until later and hope subsequent research gives a better idea; there's plenty of non-contentious species with no pages yet! Did you have any particular names in mind? -  +++$+++ Hi Schzmo - depends a bit on the degree of dispute; there's no real such thing as a single most accurate source for species; different researchers will always have different, so it is best to check what several sources say. Species that are fairly widely accepted with only a few dissenting voices, give them a page, while those where there are fewer who accept, discuss them as a paragraph under the page of the species in which they tend to get synonymised with (see e.g. ''Juniperus deltoides'' under ''[[Juniperus oxycedrus]]''). Check up on what trends there are in recent literature (if you have access to it!) to see which way opinions are going (e.g. ''Pinus washoensis'', widely regarded a valid species until about 10 years ago, is now largely dismissed as an inconsequential variant of ''P. ponderosa''; conversely, recent authors are increasingly accepting a larger number of pinyon species). Or try to judge for yourself which opinion appears the more realistic. I guess the other option is to leave them until later and hope subsequent research gives a better idea; there's plenty of non-contentious species with no pages yet! Did you have any particular names in mind? - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 22:19, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
528458 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528457 +++$+++ 528457 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.142206500E09 +++$+++ ''Pinus reflexa'' is a bit of a tricky one! Personally, I think it is a distinct species, possibly (tho' not proven) a natural hybrid between ''P. flexilis'' and ''P. strobiformis'', but it isn't widely treated as such, generally lumped with either one or the other of those (horticulturalists tend to include it in ''P. flexilis'', foresters in ''P. strobiformis''; botanists are split with ''Flora Neotropica'' treating it under ''P. flexilis'' and ''Flora N. America'' in ''P. strobiformis''). I've actually got a paper in prep on the subject which I'm planning to get published some time not too far into the future if all goes well, but on the wiki 'no original research' rule, I'd rather let it remain as a side note under ''P. flexilis'' (I have a higher regard for the authors of ''Pinus'' in ''Flora Neotropica'' than I do for the ''Pinus'' author in ''FNA'') until my paper is out -  +++$+++ :''Pinus reflexa'' is a bit of a tricky one! Personally, I think it is a distinct species, possibly (tho' not proven) a natural hybrid between ''P. flexilis'' and ''P. strobiformis'', but it isn't widely treated as such, generally lumped with either one or the other of those (horticulturalists tend to include it in ''P. flexilis'', foresters in ''P. strobiformis''; botanists are split with ''Flora Neotropica'' treating it under ''P. flexilis'' and ''Flora N. America'' in ''P. strobiformis''). I've actually got a paper in prep on the subject which I'm planning to get published some time not too far into the future if all goes well, but on the wiki 'no original research' rule, I'd rather let it remain as a side note under ''P. flexilis'' (I have a higher regard for the authors of ''Pinus'' in ''Flora Neotropica'' than I do for the ''Pinus'' author in ''FNA'') until my paper is out - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 15:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

4170 +++$+++ Slovenski Volk +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-23 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.306216680E09 +++$+++ Hi. Might you be so kind as to explain the exact transliteration of the above ? (I gather it relates to burial description). Regards   +++$+++ Hi. Might you be so kind as to explain the exact transliteration of the above ? (I gather it relates to burial description). Regards  [[User:Slovenski Volk|Slovenski Volk]] ([[User talk:Slovenski Volk|talk]]) 22:58, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
4171 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4170 +++$+++ 4170 +++$+++ 2011-05-23 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.306216980E09 +++$+++ The closest I can think of is \"tumuli (\u03a4\u03cd\u03bc\u03b2\u03bf\u03b9 is plural).  +++$+++ :The closest I can think of is "tumuli (Τύμβοι is plural). [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 23:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
4172 +++$+++ Slovenski Volk +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4170 +++$+++ 4171 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.306685700E09 +++$+++ Thanks  +++$+++ ::Thanks [[User:Slovenski Volk|Slovenski Volk]] ([[User talk:Slovenski Volk|talk]]) 09:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

266315 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-02 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.170468960E09 +++$+++ You filed a case at the AMA. Do you still want an Advocate, or another Advocate? [[User:Geo.plrd|<font color= \"blue\">G<\/font>]] +++$+++ You filed a case at the AMA. Do you still want an Advocate, or another Advocate? [[User:Geo.plrd|<font color= "blue">G</font>]][[User:Geo.plrd/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User_talk:Geo.plrd|<font color= "grey">o</font>]]. 18:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
266316 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266315 +++$+++ 266315 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.170483120E09 +++$+++ I don't know. I would have to discuss it with a potential Advocate first so I would have a \"heads up\" on what to expect. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :I don't know. I would have to discuss it with a potential Advocate first so I would have a "heads up" on what to expect. Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 22:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
266317 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266315 +++$+++ 266315 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.170671820E09 +++$+++ if you want I can give you a list of names of potential advocates. To learn what to expect you can read the Guide to Advocacy on the AMA page. Hope this helps, [[User:Geo.plrd|<font color= \"blue\">G<\/font>]] +++$+++ :if you want I can give you a list of names of potential advocates. To learn what to expect you can read the Guide to Advocacy on the AMA page. Hope this helps, [[User:Geo.plrd|<font color= "blue">G</font>]][[User:Geo.plrd/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User_talk:Geo.plrd|<font color= "grey">o</font>]]. 02:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
266318 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266315 +++$+++ 266315 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.170763440E09 +++$+++ Would you like a list of names? [[User:Geo.plrd|<font color= \"blue\">G<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Would you like a list of names? [[User:Geo.plrd|<font color= "blue">G</font>]][[User:Geo.plrd/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User_talk:Geo.plrd|<font color= "grey">o</font>]]. 04:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
266319 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266315 +++$+++ 266318 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.170764940E09 +++$+++ I don't think that would help me much. I have not had good luck with AMA Advocates. You as  the mediator of Starwood asked the now indefinitely banned  [[User:999]] to provide evidence to  block me.  The second Advocate refused to answer any of my emails. The third Advocate spread my name all over  Wikipedia by publically asking now blocked sockpuppets their opinion of me before consulting with me about this strategy -- and continued in this behavior after being repeatedly warned by another AMA Advocate that this was an unwise strategy. Plus he did not heed my wishes to stop. He then withdrew without providing me with any feedback except to have a cup of tea.  The Advocate that warned him to stop spreading my name around did  \"save\" his Advocatee from a negative  Arbitration ruling, but now his client is  up on more sockpuppetry accusations --- so I'm not seeing what good AMA Advocacy does, except save bad people. Perhaps you can persuade me otherwise. However, your signature is still very confusing so I cannot post to you. And, allthough I have read the Guide to Advocacy in the past, I can't find it at the moment. And as I remember, it did not help me before. In fact, I was quite misled by it. So, what do you think? Is there hope that anything helpful would result? I think if a user has done something bad a good Advocate can get you out of trouble, but if you want to learn and receive feedback it is not helpful for that. Sincerely,  +++$+++ ::I don't think that would help me much. I have not had good luck with AMA Advocates. You as  the mediator of Starwood asked the now indefinitely banned  [[User:999]] to provide evidence to  block me.  The second Advocate refused to answer any of my emails. The third Advocate spread my name all over  Wikipedia by publically asking now blocked sockpuppets their opinion of me before consulting with me about this strategy -- and continued in this behavior after being repeatedly warned by another AMA Advocate that this was an unwise strategy. Plus he did not heed my wishes to stop. He then withdrew without providing me with any feedback except to have a cup of tea.  The Advocate that warned him to stop spreading my name around did  "save" his Advocatee from a negative  Arbitration ruling, but now his client is  up on more sockpuppetry accusations --- so I'm not seeing what good AMA Advocacy does, except save bad people. Perhaps you can persuade me otherwise. However, your signature is still very confusing so I cannot post to you. And, allthough I have read the Guide to Advocacy in the past, I can't find it at the moment. And as I remember, it did not help me before. In fact, I was quite misled by it. So, what do you think? Is there hope that anything helpful would result? I think if a user has done something bad a good Advocate can get you out of trouble, but if you want to learn and receive feedback it is not helpful for that. Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 04:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

4173 +++$+++ Nipsonanomhmata +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-02 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.307041380E09 +++$+++ The edit warring continues. <small> +++$+++ The edit warring continues. <small>[[User:Nipsonanomhmata|<span style="color:white;background:#007">&nbsp;<span style="background:#00c">Nipson</span><span style="background:#00e">anomhmata</span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Nipsonanomhmata|(Talk)]]</sup></small> 12:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
4174 +++$+++ Nipsonanomhmata +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4173 +++$+++ 4173 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.307051040E09 +++$+++ ok. The IP address has been blocked. Sockpuppet investigation upgraded the rating on the block. <small> +++$+++ :ok. The IP address has been blocked. Sockpuppet investigation upgraded the rating on the block. <small>[[User:Nipsonanomhmata|<span style="color:white;background:#007">&nbsp;<span style="background:#00c">Nipson</span><span style="background:#00e">anomhmata</span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Nipsonanomhmata|(Talk)]]</sup></small> 14:44, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
4175 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4173 +++$+++ 4174 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.307065980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking care of that. I can't be online all the time.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for taking care of that. I can't be online all the time. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 18:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

266320 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-06 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.170801900E09 +++$+++ columns in Karnataka but I can assure you there are several styles in Karnataka alone not to mention India and defnitely needs much more knowledge than I have about it now. But this is a topic I have considered studying. The topic is highly specialised. So what I plan to do is approach it more generally first by creating \"architecture\" pages for each kingdom I have worked\/will work on. This way pillars will be mentioned in a section, as in Hoysala architecture. When I have satisfied myself that I have done basic justice to architecture, then I wil start getting more detailed, but all this takes time. +++$+++ columns in Karnataka but I can assure you there are several styles in Karnataka alone not to mention India and defnitely needs much more knowledge than I have about it now. But this is a topic I have considered studying. The topic is highly specialised. So what I plan to do is approach it more generally first by creating "architecture" pages for each kingdom I have worked/will work on. This way pillars will be mentioned in a section, as in Hoysala architecture. When I have satisfied myself that I have done basic justice to architecture, then I wil start getting more detailed, but all this takes time.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 14:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
266321 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266320 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.170808560E09 +++$+++ Please take a look at Hoysala architecture--LEAD. I added some info there based on automated peer review. +++$+++ ::Please take a look at Hoysala architecture--LEAD. I added some info there based on automated peer review.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 16:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
266322 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266320 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.170808800E09 +++$+++ Also, please look at the Peer review \"automated\" response on Peer review discussion page. We need to find a  box if there is one for architecture related pages. +++$+++ ::Also, please look at the Peer review "automated" response on Peer review discussion page. We need to find a  box if there is one for architecture related pages.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 16:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

266323 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-06 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.170814860E09 +++$+++ stepped well as an example. +++$+++ stepped well as an example.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
266324 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.170815580E09 +++$+++ Actually the article was reorganised about a month back based on your recommendation. Never-the-less if you have any further ideas, this is as good a time as any. I dont think we should worry about time line because this reorg could be a part of peer review. +++$+++ ::Actually the article was reorganised about a month back based on your recommendation. Never-the-less if you have any further ideas, this is as good a time as any. I dont think we should worry about time line because this reorg could be a part of peer review.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:33, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
266325 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.170817560E09 +++$+++ I feel basic elements has more to do with structural elements rather than religious iconification. However, it is indirectly a part of sculpture. +++$+++ ::I feel basic elements has more to do with structural elements rather than religious iconification. However, it is indirectly a part of sculpture.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
266326 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.170823500E09 +++$+++ I believe diety dedication was under basic elements earlier. But you had recommended that it be brought out. So thats what we did.thanks +++$+++ ::I believe diety dedication was under basic elements earlier. But you had recommended that it be brought out. So thats what we did.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
266327 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.170823680E09 +++$+++ I looked back to an older version, and \"Dedication\" was outside basic elements and \"deities\" was inside. We brough out deities and combined with dedication with some rewording.thanks. +++$+++ ::I looked back to an older version, and "Dedication" was outside basic elements and "deities" was inside. We brough out deities and combined with dedication with some rewording.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
266328 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.170832260E09 +++$+++ Its nobody's fault. Just suggestions and changing impressions. Feel free to move the deity dedication paragraph into where you feel appropriate. We can always change anything as we go along. Nothing is hard and fast.thanks. +++$+++ ::Its nobody's fault. Just suggestions and changing impressions. Feel free to move the deity dedication paragraph into where you feel appropriate. We can always change anything as we go along. Nothing is hard and fast.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
266329 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-07 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.170844260E09 +++$+++ India was entirely Hindu (with various versions and excepting the forest dwellers who held their own animistic beliefs) upto about 500 BCE (Hindisum itself finds its roots in the Indus Vally civilization of 3000-2000 BCE). Buddhism and Jainsim were born in India around 500BCE and by 500AD, some historians predict that nearly half of polulation had taken up Buddhism and Jainism. Later due to new emerging flexible Hindu philosophies (that we went thru in the FA's), Buddhism and Jainsim lost its appeal. But Hinduism itself had been influenced by Buddhism and Jainism to a significant extent. So by 13th century, vast majority were back to Hinduism. Then came Islam and later Christianity into India.Just a real brief. I may be off a bit in numbers. +++$+++ :: India was entirely Hindu (with various versions and excepting the forest dwellers who held their own animistic beliefs) upto about 500 BCE (Hindisum itself finds its roots in the Indus Vally civilization of 3000-2000 BCE). Buddhism and Jainsim were born in India around 500BCE and by 500AD, some historians predict that nearly half of polulation had taken up Buddhism and Jainism. Later due to new emerging flexible Hindu philosophies (that we went thru in the FA's), Buddhism and Jainsim lost its appeal. But Hinduism itself had been influenced by Buddhism and Jainism to a significant extent. So by 13th century, vast majority were back to Hinduism. Then came Islam and later Christianity into India.Just a real brief. I may be off a bit in numbers.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
266330 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-07 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.170844860E09 +++$+++ I think it has to satisfy both the India specialist with basic info on architecture (which we have given) and hopefully convey some useful info to an non-Indian who is interested in learning. +++$+++ ::I think it has to satisfy both the India specialist with basic info on architecture (which we have given) and hopefully convey some useful info to an non-Indian who is interested in learning.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
266331 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-07 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.170844980E09 +++$+++ The bottom of the article seems to be crumpled up. How do we set that right? +++$+++ ::The bottom of the article seems to be crumpled up. How do we set that right?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
266332 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-07 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.170888840E09 +++$+++ I have added a few lines about Jain temples built by Hoysalas and about their stepped wells. I need to add a citation for stepped wells which I will. My book by Foekema gives a beautiful picture of the well, but unfortunately I cant use it here. I will add an image of a Jain temple or something to that effect today. Yesterday you asked me about secular structures, well at that time, the word secular meant Vaishnava-Shaiva secularism. I explained why in one of my earlier messages. The article as of yesterday has been given a B grade on the discussion page. Can you look out for redundant words and British-American spellings. I have identified a few and changed.thanks. +++$+++ ::I have added a few lines about Jain temples built by Hoysalas and about their stepped wells. I need to add a citation for stepped wells which I will. My book by Foekema gives a beautiful picture of the well, but unfortunately I cant use it here. I will add an image of a Jain temple or something to that effect today. Yesterday you asked me about secular structures, well at that time, the word secular meant Vaishnava-Shaiva secularism. I explained why in one of my earlier messages. The article as of yesterday has been given a B grade on the discussion page. Can you look out for redundant words and British-American spellings. I have identified a few and changed.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 14:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
266333 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-07 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.170892020E09 +++$+++ Yes Buddhism virtually made an exit into China\/ SE Asia by end of first mille. I am aware of some of the minor cults like Saktaism etc but not much is written about them as they were not really popular. Vaishnava and Shaiva sects of Hindusim and Jaina religion are the 3 main topics from the 10-12th century time. +++$+++ ::Yes Buddhism virtually made an exit into China/ SE Asia by end of first mille. I am aware of some of the minor cults like Saktaism etc but not much is written about them as they were not really popular. Vaishnava and Shaiva sects of Hindusim and Jaina religion are the 3 main topics from the 10-12th century time.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
266334 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-07 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.170894480E09 +++$+++ Just occured to me. I bet we will be expected to provide a neat sketch indicating the various parts of the temple structure. Just providing relevant pictures will not cut it. +++$+++ ::Just occured to me. I bet we will be expected to provide a neat sketch indicating the various parts of the temple structure. Just providing relevant pictures will not cut it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 16:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
266335 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-07 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.170919020E09 +++$+++ ''Makara'' means beast (imaginery) and ''Torana'' is roughly equivalent to a mistletoe, except religious in nature and comprises of sacred leaves tied into a garland. This ''torana'' is hung on the wall just above the door in the entrance of most Hindu homes. ''Makaratorana'' similarly is an ornamentation on stone that decorates the doorway . A devotee entering into a Hoysala temple walks under the ''Makaratorana'' while entering the mantapa.(hall) +++$+++ ::''Makara'' means beast (imaginery) and ''Torana'' is roughly equivalent to a mistletoe, except religious in nature and comprises of sacred leaves tied into a garland. This ''torana'' is hung on the wall just above the door in the entrance of most Hindu homes. ''Makaratorana'' similarly is an ornamentation on stone that decorates the doorway . A devotee entering into a Hoysala temple walks under the ''Makaratorana'' while entering the mantapa.(hall)[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

481294 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.169605920E09 +++$+++ Can you make that sometime while the article is still on FLC, or should I ask someone else?  +++$+++ Can you make that sometime while the article is still on FLC, or should I ask someone else? [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 18:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
481295 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481294 +++$+++ 481294 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.169612460E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 20:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
481296 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481294 +++$+++ 481295 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.169624640E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, and I'll keep to my end of the deal by assuring Ignacio gets to GA ;) I think all of the tracks are good. Some had far reaching effects, like rough surf or its outer bands producing rainfall in the state.  +++$+++ ::Thank you very much, and I'll keep to my end of the deal by assuring Ignacio gets to GA ;) I think all of the tracks are good. Some had far reaching effects, like rough surf or its outer bands producing rainfall in the state. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 23:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

4182 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4182 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-23 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.308885960E09 +++$+++ So... Do you have a point to make? If so why haven't you made it before? --  +++$+++ So... Do you have a point to make? If so why haven't you made it before? -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 20:26, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
4183 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4182 +++$+++ 4182 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.308886380E09 +++$+++ The point is, GPM didn't remove anything, only moved one sentence out of the lede and into the body text [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_oldest_universities_in_continuous_operation&action=historysubmit&diff=435851689&oldid=435671124]. By re-adding this sentence [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_oldest_universities_in_continuous_operation&action=historysubmit&diff=435854525&oldid=435851689] to the lede without removing the one in the body text, ''you'' are the one introducing duplicate material. Also, the argument that mentioning the Arab world in the lede will lead to less POV-pushing falls completely with this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_oldest_universities_in_continuous_operation&action=historysubmit&diff=434027191&oldid=433746018]. Rather it seems to be having the opposite effect.  +++$+++ :The point is, GPM didn't remove anything, only moved one sentence out of the lede and into the body text [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_oldest_universities_in_continuous_operation&action=historysubmit&diff=435851689&oldid=435671124]. By re-adding this sentence [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_oldest_universities_in_continuous_operation&action=historysubmit&diff=435854525&oldid=435851689] to the lede without removing the one in the body text, ''you'' are the one introducing duplicate material. Also, the argument that mentioning the Arab world in the lede will lead to less POV-pushing falls completely with this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_oldest_universities_in_continuous_operation&action=historysubmit&diff=434027191&oldid=433746018]. Rather it seems to be having the opposite effect. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 20:33, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
4184 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4182 +++$+++ 4183 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.308887400E09 +++$+++ With regards to the duplicate content I missed that he'd added it further down.--  +++$+++ ::With regards to the duplicate content I missed that he'd added it further down.-- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 20:50, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
4185 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4182 +++$+++ 4184 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.308888600E09 +++$+++ I'm continuing the discussion on the [[Talk:List_of_oldest_universities_in_continuous_operation#Latest_changes|talk page]]. --  +++$+++ :::I'm continuing the discussion on the [[Talk:List_of_oldest_universities_in_continuous_operation#Latest_changes|talk page]]. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 21:10, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

528471 +++$+++ Maior1 +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-21 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.148258580E09 +++$+++ You have reverted an edit at http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style to correct the spelling of \"meter.\"  Please do not revert other users' edits in the future.   +++$+++ You have reverted an edit at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style to correct the spelling of "meter."  Please do not revert other users' edits in the future.  [[User:Maior1|Maior1]] 17:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
528472 +++$+++ Feydey +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528471 +++$+++ 528471 +++$+++ 2006-05-21 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.148267340E09 +++$+++ LOL, maybe [[WP:BJAODN]], hehe? \"Please do not revert other users' edits in the future\" lol.  +++$+++ :LOL, maybe [[WP:BJAODN]], hehe? "Please do not revert other users' edits in the future" lol. [[User:Feydey|feydey]] 20:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

528474 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528474 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-21 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.148269140E09 +++$+++ You beat me to it... I was just reading through the instructions for that template. Regards, -- +++$+++ You beat me to it... I was just reading through the instructions for that template. Regards, --[[User:BillC|BillC]] 20:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
528475 +++$+++ Maior1 +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528474 +++$+++ 528474 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.148284260E09 +++$+++ No, I am not a \"sockpuppet of Maior\".   +++$+++ :No, I am not a "sockpuppet of Maior".  [[User:Maior1|Maior1]] 00:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

4187 +++$+++ Slovenski Volk +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4187 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-10 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.307708640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Slovenski Volk|Slovenski Volk]] ([[User talk:Slovenski Volk|talk]]) 05:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
4188 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4187 +++$+++ 4187 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.307713500E09 +++$+++ Don't evade. I asked you a simple question, yes or no. Final chance.  +++$+++ :Don't evade. I asked you a simple question, yes or no. Final chance. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 06:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
4189 +++$+++ Slovenski Volk +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4187 +++$+++ 4188 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.307717340E09 +++$+++ No.  +++$+++ ::No. [[User:Slovenski Volk|Slovenski Volk]] ([[User talk:Slovenski Volk|talk]]) 07:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
4190 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4187 +++$+++ 4189 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.307753220E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, I don't think I can believe you.  +++$+++ :::Unfortunately, I don't think I can believe you. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 17:47, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

524986 +++$+++ James084 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524986 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-20 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.140501600E09 +++$+++ Hello.  I noticed that you are a participant in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Preclinical Medicine|WikiProject Preclinical Medicine]].  The article [[Connecting tubule]] has been nominated for [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Connecting tubule|deletion]].  As this is an anatomical subject I was hoping to get somebody within the project to adopt the article for expansion.  I could find no way to add the article to this project.  I hope you or your fellow particpants would consider adopting this article to love.   +++$+++ Hello.  I noticed that you are a participant in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Preclinical Medicine|WikiProject Preclinical Medicine]].  The article [[Connecting tubule]] has been nominated for [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connecting tubule|deletion]].  As this is an anatomical subject I was hoping to get somebody within the project to adopt the article for expansion.  I could find no way to add the article to this project.  I hope you or your fellow particpants would consider adopting this article to love.  [[User:James084|James084]] 22:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
524987 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 524986 +++$+++ 524986 +++$+++ 2006-02-23 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.140756240E09 +++$+++ It's looking pretty good now, thanks to [[User:Diberri]]'s excellent contributions.. -- +++$+++ :It's looking pretty good now, thanks to [[User:Diberri]]'s excellent contributions.. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 20:44, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

4191 +++$+++ Slovenski Volk +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4191 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-23 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.308846600E09 +++$+++ I'm coming to Hellas to party and resuscitate ur economy :)  +++$+++ I'm coming to Hellas to party and resuscitate ur economy :) [[User:Slovenski Volk|Slovenski Volk]] ([[User talk:Slovenski Volk|talk]]) 09:30, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
4192 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4191 +++$+++ 4191 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.308925560E09 +++$+++ I didn't know you partied ''that'' hard. Don't miss [[Vergina]] and [[Dion]] while you're there :)  +++$+++ :I didn't know you partied ''that'' hard. Don't miss [[Vergina]] and [[Dion]] while you're there :) [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 07:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

266336 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266336 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.170923340E09 +++$+++ In short, I am not sure which is ok and which is not, to be honest. +++$+++ In short, I am not sure which is ok and which is not, to be honest.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
266337 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266336 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.170923940E09 +++$+++ You a right. The four line paragraph on ''Jagati'' looks awful.I will try to dog up some info on this one. The problem is architecture is a very specific topic and hence tough to handle.  +++$+++ ::You a right. The four line paragraph on ''Jagati'' looks awful.I will try to dog up some info on this one. The problem is architecture is a very specific topic and hence tough to handle. [[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
266338 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266336 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.170924120E09 +++$+++ Let me post a note to user:Nichalp first and see what he says. +++$+++ ::Let me post a note to user:Nichalp first and see what he says.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:42, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
266339 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266336 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.170924180E09 +++$+++ How about '''Jagati and mantapa''' and '''Pillars and sculptures''' as combined sections. +++$+++ ::How about '''Jagati and mantapa''' and '''Pillars and sculptures''' as combined sections.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
266340 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266336 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.170924660E09 +++$+++ Yes we are in uncharted territory alright. But this is a good start. Not too many have tried this. +++$+++ ::Yes we are in uncharted territory alright. But this is a good start. Not too many have tried this.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

550069 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-09 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.157835360E09 +++$+++ Would you consider \"'''fucking Croats'''\" written by [[User:Luka_Jacov]] at [[User_talk:PANONIAN]] highly offensive? -- +++$+++ Would you consider "'''fucking Croats'''" written by [[User:Luka_Jacov]] at [[User_talk:PANONIAN]] highly offensive? --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 13:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
550070 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550069 +++$+++ 550069 +++$+++ 2006-09-09 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.157836080E09 +++$+++ Hm. Let me put it this way. I consider \"'''fucking Croats'''\" written at [[User_talk:PANONIAN]] highly offensive, and I have already warned one user for this: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:193.95.236.119]. But, I don't see firm proof that Luka wrote that. -- +++$+++ : Hm. Let me put it this way. I consider "'''fucking Croats'''" written at [[User_talk:PANONIAN]] highly offensive, and I have already warned one user for this: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:193.95.236.119]. But, I don't see firm proof that Luka wrote that. --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 14:08, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
550071 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550069 +++$+++ 550070 +++$+++ 2006-09-09 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.157843580E09 +++$+++ It was not written by Luka, but by an anonymous user: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3APANONIAN&diff=74296090&oldid=74025392 Luka just wrote his answer to me below this comment.  +++$+++ :: It was not written by Luka, but by an anonymous user: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APANONIAN&diff=74296090&oldid=74025392 Luka just wrote his answer to me below this comment. [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 16:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

4194 +++$+++ Vinie007 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4194 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-21 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.308677640E09 +++$+++ Do you really think the fustanella comes from the chiton? Please check [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=DKSS4-sQAkM&t=3m56s this greek documentary] because this give me some little questions -- +++$+++ Do you really think the fustanella comes from the chiton? Please check [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKSS4-sQAkM&t=3m56s this greek documentary] because this give me some little questions --[[User:Vinie007|Vinie007]] 10:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
4195 +++$+++ Vinie007 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4194 +++$+++ 4194 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.308677760E09 +++$+++ By the way, i never heard macedonia uses the fustanella, only Greeks and Albanians so far i know -- +++$+++ :By the way, i never heard macedonia uses the fustanella, only Greeks and Albanians so far i know --[[User:Vinie007|Vinie007]] 10:36, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

4196 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-24 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.308920520E09 +++$+++ I can agree to the Turkish name being given in the history section because the island was once part of the Ottoman Empire, but not in the lead. None of the reasons given in [[WP:NCGN]] for including the name in Turkish in the lede apply. Imbros is a very different case: The island was always inhabited by Greeks and even now there are Greeks. By contrast, there aren't any Turks on Lesbos and never many in the past.  +++$+++ I can agree to the Turkish name being given in the history section because the island was once part of the Ottoman Empire, but not in the lead. None of the reasons given in [[WP:NCGN]] for including the name in Turkish in the lede apply. Imbros is a very different case: The island was always inhabited by Greeks and even now there are Greeks. By contrast, there aren't any Turks on Lesbos and never many in the past. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean|talk]]) 06:02, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
4197 +++$+++ Takabeg +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4196 +++$+++ 4196 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.308921060E09 +++$+++ In fact I like alternative names. Constantinople-Konstantinopolis-Poli-Istanbul etc, [[Edirne]]-Odrin-Adrianopole-Adrianoupolis etc. However, if there were such rule you mentioned, we have to remove all of them. At first please remove \u0391\u03bd\u03b4\u03c1\u03b9\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03cd\u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03b9\u03c2 from [[Edirne]] and transfer to appropreate section (if any)\u3000of the article. Thank you.  +++$+++ : In fact I like alternative names. Constantinople-Konstantinopolis-Poli-Istanbul etc, [[Edirne]]-Odrin-Adrianopole-Adrianoupolis etc. However, if there were such rule you mentioned, we have to remove all of them. At first please remove Ανδριανούπολις from [[Edirne]] and transfer to appropreate section (if any)　of the article. Thank you. [[User:Takabeg|Takabeg]] ([[User talk:Takabeg|talk]]) 06:11, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
4198 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4196 +++$+++ 4197 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.308923460E09 +++$+++ Yes, I like alternative names too, but there are limits. These limits are given in [[WP:NCGN]]. Otherwise, anyone could include any alternative name wherever they like, resulting in some pretty weird situations.  +++$+++ ::Yes, I like alternative names too, but there are limits. These limits are given in [[WP:NCGN]]. Otherwise, anyone could include any alternative name wherever they like, resulting in some pretty weird situations. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 06:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

266341 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.170925260E09 +++$+++ No need to save a copy. We can try your idea and see how it looks. BTW i have left a message for Nichalp. Maybe we should wait? +++$+++ No need to save a copy. We can try your idea and see how it looks. BTW i have left a message for Nichalp. Maybe we should wait?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
266342 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266341 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.170925920E09 +++$+++ We could selectively include \"inline citation\" information into the main article to increase content if required. As far as providing basic information to the reader, I really doubt we can get more basic and convey the meaning. +++$+++ ::We could selectively include "inline citation" information into the main article to increase content if required. As far as providing basic information to the reader, I really doubt we can get more basic and convey the meaning.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
266343 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266341 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.170927660E09 +++$+++ Make it understandable to the world, yes. But within reason. An eclectic culture with an ancient history - If we get too basic, the article is just another blog site.thanks. +++$+++ ::Make it understandable to the world, yes. But within reason. An eclectic culture with an ancient history - If we get too basic, the article is just another blog site.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
266344 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266341 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.170929400E09 +++$+++ Sure. Lets see what reviews we get and we can go from there. Generally people who want to read on architecture\/History are not the unspohisticated types (though I have suffered greatly at the hands of those few exceptions who see it with political motive-disruptive users). In the FA's I think we have provided significant links, bracketed meanings etc to give the reader an opportunity to make an effort to read in detail.I know it has been an uphill task for you to help with edits, create stubs, clarify meanings, create links and learn about in India in the midst of all this  while its easy for me to write without blinking an eyelid. A few years from now when you have become more familiar with India\/India topics, you will be thinking more like me - meaning \"lets provide the details\".!!thanks. +++$+++ ::Sure. Lets see what reviews we get and we can go from there. Generally people who want to read on architecture/History are not the unspohisticated types (though I have suffered greatly at the hands of those few exceptions who see it with political motive-disruptive users). In the FA's I think we have provided significant links, bracketed meanings etc to give the reader an opportunity to make an effort to read in detail.I know it has been an uphill task for you to help with edits, create stubs, clarify meanings, create links and learn about in India in the midst of all this  while its easy for me to write without blinking an eyelid. A few years from now when you have become more familiar with India/India topics, you will be thinking more like me - meaning "lets provide the details".!!thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
266345 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266341 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-09 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.171057920E09 +++$+++ The Temple deities section in Hoysala architecture needs more citations. I will add it tonight.thanks. +++$+++ ::The Temple deities section in Hoysala architecture needs more citations. I will add it tonight.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 13:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
266346 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266341 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-09 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.171062960E09 +++$+++ We can continue to copyedit Western Chalukyas for now and cleanup ni the background.I have been working no its citations. Normally the peer review (Hoysala arch) goes on for a couple of weeks after which it gets archived. At that point we can move or not move Hoysala architecture to FA review depending on how we feel. I dont think we should bump the article simply because of slow\/low feedback. No, I have not received any feed back from Nichalp. Perhaps I can ping someone else. maybe user:deeptrivia. Tony1 I felt was a bit rough on Hoysala empire (I know he is good though). The option of moving Western Chalukyas to Peer review after Hoysala arch peer review gets archived is also open. At the end of the day, even if Hoysala arch does not become FA, we should work for a GA tag atleast. That will be a good start. Can you look for American-British spellings and make them all British on Hoysala arch? Feel free to add {{fact}} tags where you deem necessary. Thanks +++$+++ ::We can continue to copyedit Western Chalukyas for now and cleanup ni the background.I have been working no its citations. Normally the peer review (Hoysala arch) goes on for a couple of weeks after which it gets archived. At that point we can move or not move Hoysala architecture to FA review depending on how we feel. I dont think we should bump the article simply because of slow/low feedback. No, I have not received any feed back from Nichalp. Perhaps I can ping someone else. maybe user:deeptrivia. Tony1 I felt was a bit rough on Hoysala empire (I know he is good though). The option of moving Western Chalukyas to Peer review after Hoysala arch peer review gets archived is also open. At the end of the day, even if Hoysala arch does not become FA, we should work for a GA tag atleast. That will be a good start. Can you look for American-British spellings and make them all British on Hoysala arch? Feel free to add {{fact}} tags where you deem necessary. Thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
266347 +++$+++ The_Thadman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266341 +++$+++ 266341 +++$+++ 2007-02-11 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.171187820E09 +++$+++ I've changed the status of your case from \"Open\" to \"Under Investigation\" as I familiarize myself with the case... and as you probably know, this is a -very- involved case. I'm almost finished reading through all of the material and consulting with the other Advocates who were involved. Once that is finished, I'll be able to go over with you the pertinent points that I feel need to be addressed for my better understanding, and then go over what you wish to get out of Advocacy. I'll be in contact soon. <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|\u05d0\u05de\u05e8]]<\/small> <tt><b><font color=\"#0033CC\">[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso]]<\/font><\/b><\/tt> <sub><B><font color=\"#000000\">([[User:The_Thadman\/Desk|desk]]\/[[WP:AMA|AMA]])<\/font><\/B><\/sub> \u2022 '''<font color=\"#CC0000\"> +++$+++ :I've changed the status of your case from "Open" to "Under Investigation" as I familiarize myself with the case... and as you probably know, this is a -very- involved case. I'm almost finished reading through all of the material and consulting with the other Advocates who were involved. Once that is finished, I'll be able to go over with you the pertinent points that I feel need to be addressed for my better understanding, and then go over what you wish to get out of Advocacy. I'll be in contact soon. <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|אמר]]</small> <tt><b><font color="#0033CC">[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso]]</font></b></tt> <sub><B><font color="#000000">([[User:The_Thadman/Desk|desk]]/[[WP:AMA|AMA]])</font></B></sub> • '''<font color="#CC0000">[[User:The_Thadman/Give_Back_Our_Membership|Give Back Our Membership!]]</font>''' 01:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
266348 +++$+++ The_Thadman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266341 +++$+++ 266341 +++$+++ 2007-02-11 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.171192800E09 +++$+++ As I stated before, I will be in touch as soon as I can. There is a lot that I must do to understand exactly what's going on and I, like every other editor on Wikipedia, am also a volunteer trying my best to help. <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|\u05d0\u05de\u05e8]]<\/small> <tt><b><font color=\"#0033CC\">[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso]]<\/font><\/b><\/tt> <sub><B><font color=\"#000000\">([[User:The_Thadman\/Desk|desk]]\/[[WP:AMA|AMA]])<\/font><\/B><\/sub> \u2022 '''<font color=\"#CC0000\"> +++$+++ :As I stated before, I will be in touch as soon as I can. There is a lot that I must do to understand exactly what's going on and I, like every other editor on Wikipedia, am also a volunteer trying my best to help. <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|אמר]]</small> <tt><b><font color="#0033CC">[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso]]</font></b></tt> <sub><B><font color="#000000">([[User:The_Thadman/Desk|desk]]/[[WP:AMA|AMA]])</font></B></sub> • '''<font color="#CC0000">[[User:The_Thadman/Give_Back_Our_Membership|Give Back Our Membership!]]</font>''' 03:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
266349 +++$+++ The_Thadman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266341 +++$+++ 266341 +++$+++ 2007-02-11 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.171236780E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I've told you that when I am ready to continue ''I will contact you.'' If Wikipedia is \"true agony,\" the best solution in the meantime, in my experience is to take a short [[Wikipedia:Wikibreak|Wikibreak]] and I can contact you via email when things can proceed. I, personally, have a -lot- on my plate Coordinating the AMA, Administrating the [[:arc:|Aramaic Wikipedia]], being the President of a Web Design firm, a translator, a graduate student in an MLIS program, a father of a 4 month old daughter, and in the middle of trying to start a home business with my wife. I can only give so much time and effort to each endeavor. <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|\u05d0\u05de\u05e8]]<\/small> <tt><b><font color=\"#0033CC\">[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso]]<\/font><\/b><\/tt> <sub><B><font color=\"#000000\">([[User:The_Thadman\/Desk|desk]]\/[[WP:AMA|AMA]])<\/font><\/B><\/sub> \u2022 '''<font color=\"#CC0000\"> +++$+++ :Mattisse, I've told you that when I am ready to continue ''I will contact you.'' If Wikipedia is "true agony," the best solution in the meantime, in my experience is to take a short [[Wikipedia:Wikibreak|Wikibreak]] and I can contact you via email when things can proceed. I, personally, have a -lot- on my plate Coordinating the AMA, Administrating the [[:arc:|Aramaic Wikipedia]], being the President of a Web Design firm, a translator, a graduate student in an MLIS program, a father of a 4 month old daughter, and in the middle of trying to start a home business with my wife. I can only give so much time and effort to each endeavor. <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|אמר]]</small> <tt><b><font color="#0033CC">[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso]]</font></b></tt> <sub><B><font color="#000000">([[User:The_Thadman/Desk|desk]]/[[WP:AMA|AMA]])</font></B></sub> • '''<font color="#CC0000">[[User:The_Thadman/Give_Back_Our_Membership|Give Back Our Membership!]]</font>''' 15:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

528486 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-08 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.149835140E09 +++$+++ Hi Schzmo - nice addition on the taxonomy. Can you get the [[List of Arecaceae genera]] page to match? It uses the rank of tribe (not subfamily) and has eight of them, not six -  +++$+++ Hi Schzmo - nice addition on the taxonomy. Can you get the [[List of Arecaceae genera]] page to match? It uses the rank of tribe (not subfamily) and has eight of them, not six - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 23:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
528487 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528486 +++$+++ 528486 +++$+++ 2006-06-10 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.149968520E09 +++$+++ Thanks; yes, good idea to include the tribes (mebbe formatted <nowiki>;Subfamily *Tribe **''[[Genus]]'', or ===Subfamily=== ;Tribe *''[[Genus]]'')<\/nowiki>; fine using one reference, just say something like \"classification follows Uhl and Dransfield (1987)\". If a new classification comes along, it can always be changed. -  +++$+++ :Thanks; yes, good idea to include the tribes (mebbe formatted <nowiki>;Subfamily *Tribe **''[[Genus]]'', or ===Subfamily=== ;Tribe *''[[Genus]]'')</nowiki>; fine using one reference, just say something like "classification follows Uhl and Dransfield (1987)". If a new classification comes along, it can always be changed. - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 12:42, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
528488 +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528486 +++$+++ 528487 +++$+++ 2006-06-10 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.149977400E09 +++$+++ OK, I've reorganized the list - but it may require some trimming. Some genera are in the list that are not in my source and I don't know if I should leave them there. There may be dispute about distinctions and synonymous names in the list. ''''' +++$+++ ::OK, I've reorganized the list - but it may require some trimming. Some genera are in the list that are not in my source and I don't know if I should leave them there. There may be dispute about distinctions and synonymous names in the list. '''''[[User:Schzmo#|<font color="#6495ed">SCH</font><font color="#3cb371">ZMO</font>]]''''' [[User talk:Schzmo|✍]] 15:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
528489 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528486 +++$+++ 528488 +++$+++ 2006-06-12 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.150136820E09 +++$+++ Nice! Options on the ones not in the source, (1) move them to the talk page, or (2) an appendix at the bottom of the page, so that others have an opportunity to sort them. I'd suspect they'll turn out to be treated as synonyms of other genera by Uhl & Dransfield. Are any of the unlisted genera blue links? - they'll be the most difficult ones to deal with. -  +++$+++ :::Nice! Options on the ones not in the source, (1) move them to the talk page, or (2) an appendix at the bottom of the page, so that others have an opportunity to sort them. I'd suspect they'll turn out to be treated as synonyms of other genera by Uhl & Dransfield. Are any of the unlisted genera blue links? - they'll be the most difficult ones to deal with. - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 11:27, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

4199 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.309927620E09 +++$+++ If you wish to make reasonable improvements, beyond throwing all the new text out go ahead. --  +++$+++ If you wish to make reasonable improvements, beyond throwing all the new text out go ahead. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 21:47, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4200 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4199 +++$+++ 4199 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309928040E09 +++$+++ For example this ''\"When they spread they eventually replaced all other higher-learning institutions and became the preeminent institution for higher education everywhere.\"'' is completely OR. It implies there were higher learning institutions everywhere in places where there are universities now. But the ancient higher learning institutions of India for example were long gone by the time the first universities opened there. So to claim that the older institutions were \"replaced\" by unversities is nonsense, and OR. I don't see anything at the DRN in favor of including something like this. I also wouldn't edit war if I were you, and definitely not call others' edits vandalism. See [[WP:NOTVAND]] and [[WP:TE]].  +++$+++ :For example this ''"When they spread they eventually replaced all other higher-learning institutions and became the preeminent institution for higher education everywhere."'' is completely OR. It implies there were higher learning institutions everywhere in places where there are universities now. But the ancient higher learning institutions of India for example were long gone by the time the first universities opened there. So to claim that the older institutions were "replaced" by unversities is nonsense, and OR. I don't see anything at the DRN in favor of including something like this. I also wouldn't edit war if I were you, and definitely not call others' edits vandalism. See [[WP:NOTVAND]] and [[WP:TE]]. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 21:54, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4201 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4199 +++$+++ 4200 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.309928400E09 +++$+++ To quote the article as it currently stands \"From the early modern period onwards, the university gradually spread from the medieval Latin west across the globe, eventually replacing all other higher-learning institutions and becoming the preeminent institution for higher education everywhere.\" - so all I did was change the words slightly so it fit the new text. --  +++$+++ ::To quote the article as it currently stands "From the early modern period onwards, the university gradually spread from the medieval Latin west across the globe, eventually replacing all other higher-learning institutions and becoming the preeminent institution for higher education everywhere." - so all I did was change the words slightly so it fit the new text. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 22:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4202 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4199 +++$+++ 4201 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.309928520E09 +++$+++ And lets not forget you are currently editing against policy as Occasi showed to you both in dispute resolution. --  +++$+++ :::And lets not forget you are currently editing against policy as Occasi showed to you both in dispute resolution. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 22:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4203 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4199 +++$+++ 4202 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.309929060E09 +++$+++ What policy? There is no consensus for your edits, and you are alone in pushing them. This is not how we do things here, rather, it is [[WP:TE]]. You are going to have to get consensus, it's that simple. so far I see no evidence of that.  +++$+++ ::::What policy? There is no consensus for your edits, and you are alone in pushing them. This is not how we do things here, rather, it is [[WP:TE]]. You are going to have to get consensus, it's that simple. so far I see no evidence of that. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 22:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4204 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4199 +++$+++ 4203 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309929480E09 +++$+++ I suggest you take another read through the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard&oldid=437914914#List_of_oldest_universities_in_continuous_operation|dispute resolution noticeboard thread] - specifically the last comment from [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#ocaasi_last_post_uni Ocaasi] which points out the policies that you are breaking. --  +++$+++ :::::I suggest you take another read through the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard&oldid=437914914#List_of_oldest_universities_in_continuous_operation|dispute resolution noticeboard thread] - specifically the last comment from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#ocaasi_last_post_uni Ocaasi] which points out the policies that you are breaking. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 22:18, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4205 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4199 +++$+++ 4203 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.309930020E09 +++$+++ I think you would do well to read through [[WP:GUIDES]]. --  +++$+++ :::::I think you would do well to read through [[WP:GUIDES]]. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 22:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4206 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4199 +++$+++ 4205 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.309930680E09 +++$+++ And I suggest you go through [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. Insistently trying to insert your changes against consensus is [[WP:TE]].  +++$+++ ::::::And I suggest you go through [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. Insistently trying to insert your changes against consensus is [[WP:TE]]. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 22:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4207 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4199 +++$+++ 4206 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.309930860E09 +++$+++ Consensus is not a vote. I have guidelines (as well as the comments by [[User:Ocaasi]]) to backup my line of thinking, so I have a pretty strong consensus actually. You appear to have nothing beyond one sentence which you've pointed out is OR which I am more than happy to remove. --  +++$+++ :::::::Consensus is not a vote. I have guidelines (as well as the comments by [[User:Ocaasi]]) to backup my line of thinking, so I have a pretty strong consensus actually. You appear to have nothing beyond one sentence which you've pointed out is OR which I am more than happy to remove. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 22:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4208 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4199 +++$+++ 4207 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.309931040E09 +++$+++ You are completely alone, so no you definitely do not have any kind of consensus. Did you read through [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. By the way please don't hope that you can keep posting here until you have the last word and then claim I \"stopped talking\". You don't have any kind of consensus, period. The sooner you accept that, the better for everyone involved. I'm not going to repeat myself.  +++$+++ ::::::::You are completely alone, so no you definitely do not have any kind of consensus. Did you read through [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. By the way please don't hope that you can keep posting here until you have the last word and then claim I "stopped talking". You don't have any kind of consensus, period. The sooner you accept that, the better for everyone involved. I'm not going to repeat myself. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 22:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

528490 +++$+++ GHe +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-14 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.150353540E09 +++$+++ <strong>&nbsp;[[User:GHe|<font color=\"blue\">G<\/font>]].[[User talk:GHe|<font color=\"#666666\">H<\/font>]] +++$+++ <strong>&nbsp;[[User:GHe|<font color="blue">G</font>]].[[User talk:GHe|<font color="#666666">H</font>]][[User:GHe/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]</strong> 23:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
528491 +++$+++ GHe +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528490 +++$+++ 528490 +++$+++ 2006-06-16 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.150443600E09 +++$+++ No problem at all! I'm sure you already know the link, but in case you don't, there are two: [[User:GHe\/E1]] and [[User:GHe\/E2]]. E1 is for names '''not''' ending in ''s'' while E2 is for names that do. Also, for names with multiple words, make a second parameter like this: <code><nowiki>{{subst:User:GHe\/E1|User Name|User+Name}}<\/nowiki><\/code>. ('''Note to self:''' ''If this gets really useful in the future, GHe may move the pages to a true template page... :)'')<strong>&nbsp;[[User:GHe|<font color=\"blue\">G<\/font>]].[[User talk:GHe|<font color=\"#666666\">H<\/font>]] +++$+++ :No problem at all! I'm sure you already know the link, but in case you don't, there are two: [[User:GHe/E1]] and [[User:GHe/E2]]. E1 is for names '''not''' ending in ''s'' while E2 is for names that do. Also, for names with multiple words, make a second parameter like this: <code><nowiki>{{subst:User:GHe/E1|User Name|User+Name}}</nowiki></code>. ('''Note to self:''' ''If this gets really useful in the future, GHe may move the pages to a true template page... :)'')<strong>&nbsp;[[User:GHe|<font color="blue">G</font>]].[[User talk:GHe|<font color="#666666">H</font>]][[User:GHe/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]</strong> 00:40, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

266351 +++$+++ Rdsmith4 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-11 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.171251420E09 +++$+++ I accused you of having operated sockpuppets for the simple reason that checkuser evidence indicated that you have. This having been a long time ago, I do not recall the specifics; I do, however, recall that the evidence was strong. Moreover, you sent me a number of e-mails in which you admitted to sockpuppetry and promised to discontinue the practice if I unblocked you. This sounded fair, so unblock you I did. I am utterly mystified at your sudden pretence of innocence. &mdash;  +++$+++ I accused you of having operated sockpuppets for the simple reason that checkuser evidence indicated that you have. This having been a long time ago, I do not recall the specifics; I do, however, recall that the evidence was strong. Moreover, you sent me a number of e-mails in which you admitted to sockpuppetry and promised to discontinue the practice if I unblocked you. This sounded fair, so unblock you I did. I am utterly mystified at your sudden pretence of innocence. &mdash; [[User:Rdsmith4|Dan]] | [[User talk:Rdsmith4|talk]] 19:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
266352 +++$+++ Rdsmith4 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266351 +++$+++ 266351 +++$+++ 2007-02-11 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.171260240E09 +++$+++ I neither know nor care whether you have been sockpuppeting since the occasion in which I was previously involved. Perhaps you are now wrongfully accused; I don't know. I cannot quite see your point in asking me these questions; all I can say is that you did previously operate a number of sockpuppets, you admitted the fact to me, and you promised not to do it again. &mdash;  +++$+++ :I neither know nor care whether you have been sockpuppeting since the occasion in which I was previously involved. Perhaps you are now wrongfully accused; I don't know. I cannot quite see your point in asking me these questions; all I can say is that you did previously operate a number of sockpuppets, you admitted the fact to me, and you promised not to do it again. &mdash; [[User:Rdsmith4|Dan]] | [[User talk:Rdsmith4|talk]] 22:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
266353 +++$+++ Rdsmith4 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266351 +++$+++ 266352 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.171270380E09 +++$+++ You're welcome? I really don't know how you expect me to respond. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::You're welcome? I really don't know how you expect me to respond. &mdash; [[User:Rdsmith4|Dan]] | [[User talk:Rdsmith4|talk]] 00:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
266354 +++$+++ Rdsmith4 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266351 +++$+++ 266351 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.171272060E09 +++$+++ This is absurd. You got caught sockpuppeting (entirely by chance). If my having caught you has caused \"horrible damage\" then the fault is yours for having broken the rules to begin with. Please do not leave me further messages unless you have something meaningful to say. &mdash;  +++$+++ :This is absurd. You got caught sockpuppeting (entirely by chance). If my having caught you has caused "horrible damage" then the fault is yours for having broken the rules to begin with. Please do not leave me further messages unless you have something meaningful to say. &mdash; [[User:Rdsmith4|Dan]] | [[User talk:Rdsmith4|talk]] 01:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
266355 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266351 +++$+++ 266354 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 08:37:00 +++$+++ 1.171298220E09 +++$+++ I think there is a need for a little calmness here, yesterday we had an anon IP add a sockpuppet tag which was quickly removed. Annoying, yes, but its something you need to take in your stride. And the action seems to have been in reltaliation to your own adding of a sock tag[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Hanuman_Das&diff=prev&oldid=107257612]. I'm increasingly thinking there is little to be gained by digging up old stuff. The technical data has for the most part expired as IP records are only kept for a short time. Other evidence is inconclusive and hard to draw any conclusions. -- +++$+++ ::I think there is a need for a little calmness here, yesterday we had an anon IP add a sockpuppet tag which was quickly removed. Annoying, yes, but its something you need to take in your stride. And the action seems to have been in reltaliation to your own adding of a sock tag[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Hanuman_Das&diff=prev&oldid=107257612]. I'm increasingly thinking there is little to be gained by digging up old stuff. The technical data has for the most part expired as IP records are only kept for a short time. Other evidence is inconclusive and hard to draw any conclusions. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 08:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

4209 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.309931400E09 +++$+++ We can escalate it again, and discuss it at the mediation cabal if its really needed. --  +++$+++ We can escalate it again, and discuss it at the mediation cabal if its really needed. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 22:50, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4210 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4209 +++$+++ 4209 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309931640E09 +++$+++ You do realise that Wikipedia is not a democracy, and that its the strength of the arguments that count. If I have a guideline backing up my position and you have nothing then I clearly have consensus with the sorts of numbers we are talking about here. --  +++$+++ :You do realise that Wikipedia is not a democracy, and that its the strength of the arguments that count. If I have a guideline backing up my position and you have nothing then I clearly have consensus with the sorts of numbers we are talking about here. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 22:54, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

528498 +++$+++ Sergeant Snopake +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-25 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.151260140E09 +++$+++ Happy Birthday! <tt><font color=\"#FF00FF\"> +++$+++ Happy Birthday! <tt><font color="#FF00FF">[[User:Sergeant Snopake|Sergeant]]</font> <font color="#3366FF">[[User_talk:Sergeant Snopake|Snopake]]</font></tt> 11:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
528499 +++$+++ Deepujoseph +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528498 +++$+++ 528498 +++$+++ 2006-06-25 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.151275380E09 +++$+++ Happy Birthday! --[[User:Deepujoseph| thunderboltz]]<sup>a.k.a.D<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :Happy Birthday! --[[User:Deepujoseph| thunderboltz]]<sup>a.k.a.D<font color="green">[[User:Deepujoseph/Esperanza|e]]</font>epu<font color="white">&nbsp;</font>Joseph&nbsp;|<font color="green">[[user_talk:Deepujoseph|TALK]]</font></sup>15:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
528500 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Schzmo +++$+++ 528498 +++$+++ 528498 +++$+++ 2006-07-01 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.151739780E09 +++$+++ Done it now - let me know what you think -  +++$+++ :Done it now - let me know what you think - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 00:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

4211 +++$+++ BouzoukiGr +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310147340E09 +++$+++ - +++$+++ -[[User:BouzoukiGr|BouzoukiGr]] ([[User talk:BouzoukiGr|talk]]) 10:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
4212 +++$+++ Cplakidas +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4211 +++$+++ 4211 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.310168340E09 +++$+++ \u03a4\u03c1\u03bf\u03bc\u03ac\u03c1\u03b1 \u03bc\u03bf\u03c5 \u03bf\u03b9 \u03b1\u03bb\u03b7\u03b8\u03b9\u03bd\u03bf\u03af \u0388\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b5\u03c2\u2122 \u03bc\u03b5 \u03c0\u03ae\u03c1\u03b1\u03bd \u03c7\u03b1\u03bc\u03c0\u03ac\u03c1\u03b9! \u0395\u03c5\u03c4\u03c5\u03c7\u03ce\u03c2 \u03b4\u03b5\u03bd \u03b1\u03bd\u03b1\u03ba\u03ac\u03bb\u03c5\u03c8\u03b1\u03bd \u03b1\u03ba\u03cc\u03bc\u03b1 \u03cc\u03c4\u03b9 \u03c0\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1 \u03b1\u03c0\u03cc \u03c3\u03bb\u03b1\u03b2\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae-\u03bf\u03b8\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03b3\u03c9\u03b3\u03ae \u03ad\u03c7\u03c9 \u03b5\u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03b7\u03c2 \u03b1\u03bb\u03b2\u03b1\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae, \u03b3\u03b5\u03c1\u03bc\u03b1\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae, \u03b1\u03b6\u03c4\u03b5\u03ba\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae, \u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03c3\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03ba\u03b9\u03bd\u03ad\u03b6\u03b9\u03ba\u03b7, \u03ae \u03cc\u03c4\u03b9 \u03bc\u03b5 \u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c1\u03ce\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03bd \u03bf\u03b9 \u0395\u03bb\u03bf\u03c7\u03af\u03bc \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03b7 \u039c\u039f\u03a3\u0391\u039d\u03a4 \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03c1\u03ad\u03c8\u03c9 \u03c4\u03bf\u03bd \u03b5\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b9\u03c3\u03bc\u03cc \u03bc\u03b1\u03b6\u03af \u03bc\u03b5 \u03c4\u03bf \u0393\u03b9\u03c9\u03c1\u03b3\u03ac\u03ba\u03b7. \u0395 \u03c1\u03b5 \u03c0\u03b1\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b9\u03ad\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03ad\u03c7\u03bf\u03c5\u03bc\u03b5 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03b4\u03bf\u03cd\u03bc\u03b5 \u03b1\u03ba\u03cc\u03bc\u03b1 \u03b5\u03b4\u03ce \u03c0\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1...  +++$+++ :Τρομάρα μου οι αληθινοί Έλληνες™ με πήραν χαμπάρι! Ευτυχώς δεν ανακάλυψαν ακόμα ότι πέρα από σλαβική-οθωμανική καταγωγή έχω επίσης αλβανική, γερμανική, αζτεκική, περσική και κινέζικη, ή ότι με πληρώνουν οι Ελοχίμ και η ΜΟΣΑΝΤ για να καταστρέψω τον ελληνισμό μαζί με το Γιωργάκη. Ε ρε παπαριές που έχουμε να δούμε ακόμα εδώ πέρα... [[User:Cplakidas|Constantine]]  [[User talk:Cplakidas| ✍ ]] 16:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

4213 +++$+++ BouzoukiGr +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.310171880E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:BouzoukiGr|BouzoukiGr]] ([[User talk:BouzoukiGr|talk]]) 17:38, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
4214 +++$+++ Cplakidas +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4213 +++$+++ 4213 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310172960E09 +++$+++ \u039a\u03b1\u03bb\u03ac \u03ba\u03c1\u03b1\u03c3\u03b9\u03ac... \u039c\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03be\u03cd \u03bc\u03b1\u03c2, \u03c3\u03c4\u03b7 \u03b8\u03ad\u03c3\u03b7 \u03c3\u03bf\u03c5 \u03b4\u03b5\u03bd \u03b8\u03b1 \u03c3\u03c7\u03bf\u03bb\u03af\u03b1\u03b6\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03b5\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03b1 \u03b7 \u03bc\u03ae \u03ac\u03bb\u03bb\u03c9\u03bd \u03b1\u03bd \u03ad\u03b3\u03c1\u03b1\u03c6\u03b1 \u03c4\u03cc\u03c3\u03bf \u03b1\u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03ac\u03c1\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03b1 \u03b5\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03ac \u03cc\u03c3\u03bf \u03b5\u03c3\u03cd. \u0391\u03bd \u03b8\u03b5\u03c2 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03bb\u03ad\u03b3\u03b5\u03c3\u03b1\u03b9 \u0388\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b1\u03c2, \u03bc\u03ac\u03b8\u03b5 \u03c0\u03c1\u03ce\u03c4\u03b1 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03c7\u03b5\u03b9\u03c1\u03af\u03b6\u03b5\u03c3\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c3\u03c9\u03c3\u03c4\u03ac \u03c4\u03b7 \u03b3\u03bb\u03ce\u03c3\u03c3\u03b1 \u03bc\u03b1\u03c2. \u038c\u03c3\u03bf \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u03bc\u03c0\u03bf\u03cd\u03c1\u03b4\u03b5\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03b3\u03c1\u03ac\u03c6\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c0\u03b9\u03bf \u03c0\u03ac\u03bd\u03c9, \u03bc\u03b5\u03c4\u03ac \u03c7\u03b1\u03c1\u03ac\u03c2 \u03c0\u03ae\u03b3\u03b1\u03b9\u03bd\u03ad \u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c3\u03c4\u03b1 \"\u03b1\u03bd\u03ce\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03b1 \u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03bb\u03ad\u03c7\u03b7\" \u03bc\u03b1\u03b6\u03af \u03bc\u03b5 \u03c4\u03b1 \"\u03b1\u03c4\u03c1\u03ac\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1\u03c7\u03c4\u03b1 \u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9\u03c7\u03b5\u03af\u03b1\" \u03c3\u03bf\u03c5. \u0399\u03b4\u03bf\u03cd \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c4\u03bf \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03ac\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bb\u03bf \u03bb\u03b9\u03bd\u03ba: [[WP:ANI]]. \u0398\u03b1 \u03b3\u03b5\u03bb\u03ac\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c4\u03bf \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b4\u03b1\u03bb\u03cc \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03c3\u03af\u03ba\u03b9.  +++$+++ :Καλά κρασιά... Μεταξύ μας, στη θέση σου δεν θα σχολίαζα την ελληνικότητα η μή άλλων αν έγραφα τόσο ασυνάρτητα ελληνικά όσο εσύ. Αν θες να λέγεσαι Έλληνας, μάθε πρώτα να χειρίζεσαι σωστά τη γλώσσα μας. Όσο για τις μπούρδες που γράφεις πιο πάνω, μετά χαράς πήγαινέ τις στα "ανώτερα στελέχη" μαζί με τα "ατράνταχτα στοιχεία" σου. Ιδού και το κατάλληλο λινκ: [[WP:ANI]]. Θα γελάσει και το παρδαλό κατσίκι. [[User:Cplakidas|Constantine]]  [[User talk:Cplakidas| ✍ ]] 17:56, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

266358 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-13 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.171403940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the tweaks on [[De Leon Springs State Park|De Leon Springs]] and [[Torreya State Park|Torreya]]; muchly improved. :) -- +++$+++ Thanks for the tweaks on [[De Leon Springs State Park|De Leon Springs]] and [[Torreya State Park|Torreya]]; muchly improved. :) --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 13:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
266359 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266358 +++$+++ 266358 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.171411380E09 +++$+++ As far as gov't sources \"copyvio\", I think since it's usually public domain, it's not really copyvio. Though I like to at least rearrange things a bit anyway, just in case and for aesthetics. Of course, I mostly do stubs so I don't have to worry about that sort of thing. In the time it would take me to do a decent article, I can create dozens of stubs. I believe in quantity over quality. Though even my quantities need to have a minumum level of quality, doncha know.  :) -- +++$+++ :As far as gov't sources "copyvio", I think since it's usually public domain, it's not really copyvio. Though I like to at least rearrange things a bit anyway, just in case and for aesthetics. Of course, I mostly do stubs so I don't have to worry about that sort of thing. In the time it would take me to do a decent article, I can create dozens of stubs. I believe in quantity over quality. Though even my quantities need to have a minumum level of quality, doncha know.  :) --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 16:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

4215 +++$+++ BouzoukiGr +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310174160E09 +++$+++ ''\u0395\u03b9\u03bd\u03b1\u03b9 \u03bf\u03b9 \u03b3\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2 \u03bc\u03b5\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd\u03bf\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c4\u03bf \u03b5\u03bd\u03b4\u03b9\u03b1\u03c6\u03b5\u03c1\u03bf\u03bd \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03c4\u03bf \u03b5\u03c0\u03b9\u03ba\u03b5\u03bd\u03c4\u03c1\u03c9\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03bd \u03c3\u03c4\u03b1 \u03b5\u03bb\u03b1\u03c7\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1 \u03b1\u03c1\u03b8\u03c1\u03b1 \u03c4\u03c9\u03bd \u03c3\u03bb\u03b1\u03b2\u03c9\u03bd, \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03c0\u03b1\u03b8\u03c9\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1\u03c2 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03ba\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03bd \u03c3\u03c5\u03bb\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03b5\u03c2 \u03c0\u03b7\u03b3\u03c9\u03bd \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03c4\u03b5\u03ba\u03bc\u03b7\u03c1\u03b9\u03c9\u03c3\u03b7 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2! \u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c3\u03bf\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03b5\u03c2 \u03c6\u03bf\u03c1\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b1\u03c4\u03b5\u03ba\u03bc\u03b7\u03c1\u03b9\u03c9\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b1\u03c0\u03bf \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03b2\u03b9\u03ba\u03b9\u03c0\u03b1\u03b9\u03b4\u03b5\u03b9\u03b1 \u03bf\u03bc\u03c9\u03c2'' \u03c4\u03bf \u03b5\u03c0\u03b1\u03bd\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1\u03bc\u03b2\u03b1\u03bd\u03c9 . \u0395\u03ba\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2 \u03b1\u03c0\u03bf \u03c4\u03bf \u03bd\u03b1 \u03ba\u03b1\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03bc\u03bf\u03bd\u03bf \u03bb\u03b1\u03b8\u03b7 \u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1\u03ba\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1, \u03b1\u03bd \u03bc\u03c0\u03bf\u03c1\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03b1\u03c2 \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03c0\u03b1\u03b8\u03b7\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03bc\u03b9\u03bb\u03b7\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1 \u03c3\u03c4\u03bf \u03b5\u03bb\u03b1\u03c7\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf \u03bf\u03c0\u03c9\u03c2 \u03b5\u03b3\u03c9! \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b1 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03bc\u03b9\u03bb\u03b1\u03c2 \u03c3\u03b1\u03bd \u03c0\u03b1\u03ba\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2 \u03bc\u03c0\u03bf\u03c5\u03b6\u03bf\u03c5\u03be\u03b7\u03c2 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 \u03b4\u03c1\u03bf\u03bc\u03bf\u03c5, \u039f\u03c3\u03bf \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b1 \u03b1\u03b3\u03b3\u03bb\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1 \u03b1\u03c2 \u03c4\u03b1\u03c6\u03b7\u03c3\u03c9 \u03ba\u03b1\u03bb\u03c5\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03b1, \u03b1\u03bb\u03bb\u03b1 \u03b1\u03c6\u03bf\u03c5 \u03bc\u03b5\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd\u03bf\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b5\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5, \u03b4\u03b5\u03bd \u03c5\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03c7\u03bf\u03c5\u03bd \u03be\u03b5\u03c1\u03b5\u03c4\u03b5 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03bb\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b1\u03c0\u03b1\u03b9\u03c4\u03b7\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c3\u03c4\u03bf \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03c9\u03c0\u03bf \u03c3\u03b1\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03b4\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03b9\u03bf\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03b7\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03b1, \u03b2\u03c1\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1\u03b5\u03b9 \u03bc\u03b5\u03c7\u03c1\u03b9 \u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b1 \u03c4\u03bf \u03b8\u03b5\u03bc\u03b1 \u03c3\u03b1\u03c2... -- +++$+++ ''Ειναι οι γνωστες μειονοτητες που το ενδιαφερον τους το επικεντρωνουν στα ελαχιστα αρθρα των σλαβων, προσπαθωντας να κανουν συλλογες πηγων για την τεκμηριωση τους! τις περισσοτερες φορες ατεκμηριωτες απο την βικιπαιδεια ομως'' το επαναλαμβανω . Εκτος απο το να κανεις μονο λαθη συντακτικα, αν μπορεις ας προσπαθησεις να μιλησεις καλα στο ελαχιστο οπως εγω! παρα να μιλας σαν πακιστανος μπουζουξης του δρομου, Οσο για τα αγγλικα ας ταφησω καλυτερα, αλλα αφου μειονοτητες ειστε, δεν υπαρχουν ξερετε και πολλες απαιτησεις στο προσωπο σας και δικαιολογημενα, βρωμαει μεχρι περα το θεμα σας... --[[User:BouzoukiGr|BouzoukiGr]] ([[User talk:BouzoukiGr|talk]]) 18:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
4216 +++$+++ Cplakidas +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4215 +++$+++ 4215 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310176020E09 +++$+++ \u039d\u03b1 \u03bc\u03b9\u03bb\u03ae\u03c3\u03c9 \u03ba\u03b1\u03bb\u03ac? \u039c\u03b5 \u03ba\u03ac\u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c7\u03c9\u03c1\u03af\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03bd\u03ad\u03bd\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b5\u03ba\u03bc\u03ae\u03c1\u03b9\u03bf \u03b1\u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03cd\u03c4\u03c9\u03c2 \u03bb\u03ad\u03b5\u03b9 \u03cc\u03c4\u03b9 \u03b5\u03af\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c3\u03bb\u03b1\u03b2\u03bf-\u03bf\u03b8\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1\u03bd\u03cc\u03c2 \u03c0\u03c1\u03ac\u03ba\u03c4\u03bf\u03c1\u03b1\u03c2? \u039c\u03b5 \u03ba\u03ac\u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c4\u03bf\u03bd \u03cc\u03c1\u03bf \"\u03bc\u03b5\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03b1\" \u03c4\u03bf\u03bd \u03c7\u03b5\u03b9\u03c1\u03af\u03b6\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c3\u03b1\u03bd \u03b2\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03b9\u03ac \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c3\u03b1\u03bd \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b7\u03b3\u03bf\u03c1\u03af\u03b1 \u03b5\u03b8\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae\u03c2 \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03b4\u03bf\u03c3\u03af\u03b1\u03c2? \u039c\u03b5 \u03ba\u03ac\u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c3\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03ba\u03bf\u03c3\u03bc\u03ac\u03c1\u03b1 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 \u03cc\u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03bf\u03c2 \u03b4\u03b9\u03b1\u03c6\u03c9\u03bd\u03b5\u03af \u03bc\u03b1\u03b6\u03af \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 \u03ae \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03c0\u03b1\u03b8\u03b5\u03af \u03bd\u03b1 \u03b5\u03c6\u03b1\u03c1\u03bc\u03cc\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9 \u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03b9\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03ad\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03bd\u03b9\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03cd\u03c2 \u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 WP \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03bf copyright \u03b5\u03af\u03bd\u03b1\u03b9 \u03b1\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03b8\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9\u03c7\u03b5\u03af\u03bf? \u03a4\u03af \u03c0\u03af\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c1\u03b5 \u03c6\u03af\u03bb\u03b5? \u03a0\u03bf\u03b9\u03cc\u03c2 \u03bd\u03bf\u03bc\u03af\u03b6\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03cc\u03c4\u03b9 \u03b5\u03af\u03c3\u03b1\u03b9 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03ad\u03c7\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c4\u03bf \u03b4\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03af\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03b1\u03bc\u03c6\u03b9\u03c3\u03b2\u03b7\u03c4\u03b5\u03af\u03c2 \u03c4\u03bf \u03b1\u03bd \u03b5\u03af\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 \u0388\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b1\u03c2 \u03ae \u03cc\u03c7\u03b9? \u039c\u03b5 \u03be\u03ad\u03c1\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b9 \u03b1\u03c0\u03cc \u03c7\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2? \u0388\u03c7\u03c9 \u03b1\u03bd\u03c4\u03b9\u03bc\u03b5\u03c4\u03c9\u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9 \u03b1\u03c1\u03ba\u03b5\u03c4\u03ad\u03c2 \u03bc\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1\u03ba\u03af\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b1\u03c0\u03cc \u03be\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03c3\u03c4\u03b7 \u03b6\u03c9\u03ae \u03bc\u03bf\u03c5 \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c7\u03ac\u03c1\u03b7 \u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03ac\u03b4\u03b1\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c6\u03ac\u03b5\u03b9 \u03b1\u03c1\u03ba\u03b5\u03c4\u03ad\u03c2 \u03b5\u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03b7\u03c2 \u03bc\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1\u03ba\u03af\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b1\u03c0\u03cc \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03ac\u03c1\u03b5\u03c2 \u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 \u03b4\u03b5\u03ba\u03ac\u03c1\u03b1\u03c2 \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03b1\u03bd\u03ad\u03c7\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 \u03bc\u03c0\u03bf\u03cd\u03c1\u03b4\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b1\u03c0\u03cc \u03ac\u03b3\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03c4\u03cd\u03c0\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03c3\u03c4\u03bf \u03af\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03bd\u03b5\u03c4 \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03b4\u03b5\u03bd \u03bc\u03c0\u03bf\u03c1\u03bf\u03cd\u03bd \u03bd\u03b1 \u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03c4\u03ac\u03be\u03bf\u03c5\u03bd \u03bc\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c0\u03c1\u03cc\u03c4\u03b1\u03c3\u03b7 \u03c3\u03c9\u03c3\u03c4\u03ac. [[WP:DNFTT]] \u03b1\u03c0\u03cc \u03b4\u03c9 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c0\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1. \u03a0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b5\u03bc\u03c0\u03b9\u03c0\u03c4\u03cc\u03bd\u03c4\u03c9\u03c2, \u03b4\u03b5\u03bd \u03be\u03ad\u03c1\u03c9 \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03b6\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2, \u03b1\u03bb\u03bb\u03ac \u03c0\u03b1\u03ba\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03bd\u03cc \u03bc\u03c0\u03bf\u03c5\u03b6\u03bf\u03c5\u03be\u03ae \u03c3\u03c4\u03bf \u03b4\u03c1\u03cc\u03bc\u03bf \u03b4\u03b5\u03bd \u03ad\u03c7\u03c9 \u03b4\u03b5\u03b9 \u03b1\u03ba\u03cc\u03bc\u03b1 \u03c3\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03ac\u03b4\u03b1. \u0395\u03bd\u03b4\u03b9\u03b1\u03c6\u03ad\u03c1\u03c9\u03bd \u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b4\u03c5\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03cc\u03c2 \u03b1\u03ba\u03bf\u03cd\u03b3\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9.  +++$+++ :Να μιλήσω καλά? Με κάποιον που χωρίς κανένα τεκμήριο απολύτως λέει ότι είμαι σλαβο-οθωμανός πράκτορας? Με κάποιον που τον όρο "μειονότητα" τον χειρίζεται σαν βρισιά και σαν κατηγορία εθνικής προδοσίας? Με κάποιον που στην κοσμάρα του όποιος διαφωνεί μαζί του ή προσπαθεί να εφαρμόσει τις πολιτικές και τους κανονισμούς της WP για το copyright είναι αντεθνικό στοιχείο? Τί πίνεις ρε φίλε? Ποιός νομίζεις ότι είσαι και έχεις το δικαίωμα να αμφισβητείς το αν είμαι Έλληνας ή όχι? Με ξέρεις κι από χτες? Έχω αντιμετωπίσει αρκετές μαλακίες από ξένους στη ζωή μου για χάρη της Ελλάδας και φάει αρκετές επίσης μαλακίες από Ελληνάρες της δεκάρας για να ανέχομαι μπούρδες από άγνωστους τύπους στο ίντερνετ που δεν μπορούν να συντάξουν μια πρόταση σωστά. [[WP:DNFTT]] από δω και πέρα. Παρεμπιπτόντως, δεν ξέρω που ζεις, αλλά πακιστανό μπουζουξή στο δρόμο δεν έχω δει ακόμα στην Ελλάδα. Ενδιαφέρων συνδυασμός ακούγεται. [[User:Cplakidas|Constantine]]  [[User talk:Cplakidas| ✍ ]] 18:47, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

4217 +++$+++ BouzoukiGr +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.310176440E09 +++$+++ \u03a4\u03bf \u03b2\u03bb\u03b5\u03c0\u03c9\xa8\u03c0\u03c9\u03c2.. \u03c4\u03bf \u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1\u03ba\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf \u03c3\u03bf\u03c5 \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03bd\u03bf\u03bc\u03c0\u03b5\u03bb, \u03bf\u03bb\u03bf \u03bb\u03b1\u03b8\u03b7   [[WP:DNFTT]] \u03c0\u03b7\u03b3\u03b1\u03b9\u03bd\u03b5, \u03bf\u03c3\u03bf \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03bf \u03bd\u03b5\u03bf \u03b5\u03b9\u03b4\u03bf\u03c2 \"\u03c0\u03b1\u03ba\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2 \u03bc\u03c0\u03bf\u03c5\u03b6\u03bf\u03c5\u03be\u03ae\u03c2\" \u03bc\u03b7\u03bd \u03c4\u03bf \u03b3\u03b5\u03bb\u03b1\u03c2, \u03bc\u03c0\u03bf\u03c1\u03b5\u03b9 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03b5\u03b9\u03c3\u03b1\u03b9 \u03ba \u03bf \u03c0\u03c1\u03c9\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03b8\u03b1 \u03c4\u03bf \u03c5\u03b9\u03bf\u03b8\u03b5\u03c4\u03b7\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9! (\u03b5\u03bd\u03b1 \u03c7\u03c1\u03b7\u03c3\u03b9\u03bc\u03bf \u03b2\u03b9\u03b2\u03bb\u03b9\u03bf,\u03b5\u03b9\u03b4\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03bc\u03b5\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd\u03bf\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2) http:\/\/www.greek-language.gr\/greekLang\/modern_greek\/tools\/lexica\/triantafyllides\/index.html  -- +++$+++ Το βλεπω¨πως.. το συντακτικο σου για νομπελ, ολο λαθη   [[WP:DNFTT]] πηγαινε, οσο για το νεο ειδος "πακιστανος μπουζουξής" μην το γελας, μπορει να εισαι κ ο πρωτος που θα το υιοθετησει! (ενα χρησιμο βιβλιο,ειδικο για μειονοτητες) http://www.greek-language.gr/greekLang/modern_greek/tools/lexica/triantafyllides/index.html  --[[User:BouzoukiGr|BouzoukiGr]] ([[User talk:BouzoukiGr|talk]]) 18:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
4218 +++$+++ Nipsonanomhmata +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4217 +++$+++ 4217 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310189220E09 +++$+++ Sigoura eiste oloi Ellhnes. Mono oi Ellhnes vriskountai shnexeia se efileo polemo. Thelo thn voitheia sas. Kai ton [[Manolis Chiotis|Manoli Chioti]] prospathisan na svisoun shmera. Mou exoun ponesi to stomaxh mou. Pane oloi oi mbouzouksides mazomenoi. <small> +++$+++ :Sigoura eiste oloi Ellhnes. Mono oi Ellhnes vriskountai shnexeia se efileo polemo. Thelo thn voitheia sas. Kai ton [[Manolis Chiotis|Manoli Chioti]] prospathisan na svisoun shmera. Mou exoun ponesi to stomaxh mou. Pane oloi oi mbouzouksides mazomenoi. <small>[[User:Nipsonanomhmata|<span style="color:white;background:#007">&nbsp;<span style="background:#00c">Nipson</span><span style="background:#00e">anomhmata</span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Nipsonanomhmata|(Talk)]]</sup></small> 22:27, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
4219 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4217 +++$+++ 4218 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.310192220E09 +++$+++ \u03a0\u03ac\u03b5\u03b9 \u03bf \u03ba\u03b1\u03c6\u03b5\u03bd\u03ad\u03c2, \u266a \/ \u03c0\u03ac\u03b5\u03b9 \u03bf \u03bc\u03c0\u03b1\u03b3\u03bb\u03b1\u03bc\u03ac\u03c2 \u266b \u2669 \/ \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 '\u03c0\u03b1\u03b9\u03b6\u03b5 \u03bf \u03b3\u03b5\u03c1\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03cc\u03bc\u03b1\u03b3\u03ba\u03b1\u03c2 \u266a\u2669 ... \u2013 didn't you see that problem was solved? I told you the copyvio thing was a mistake. <small>(In other news, \u03bf \u03c0\u03b1\u03bb\u03b9\u03cc\u03c2 \u03bf \u03bc\u03ac\u03b3\u03ba\u03b1\u03c2 \u03b4\u03b5 \u03b2\u03b3\u03ac\u03b6\u03b5\u03b9 \u03c0\u03b9\u03b1 \u03bc\u03b9\u03bb\u03b9\u03ac [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ABouzoukiGr]).<\/small>  +++$+++ :: Πάει ο καφενές, ♪ / πάει ο μπαγλαμάς ♫ ♩ / που 'παιζε ο γεροντόμαγκας ♪♩ ... – didn't you see that problem was solved? I told you the copyvio thing was a mistake. <small>(In other news, ο παλιός ο μάγκας δε βγάζει πια μιλιά [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ABouzoukiGr]).</small> [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 23:17, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
4220 +++$+++ PartaMou +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4217 +++$+++ 4218 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.310194260E09 +++$+++ Sorry \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03b5\u03c0\u03b5\u03bc\u03b2\u03b1\u03b9\u03bd\u03c9,\u03b1\u03bb\u03bb\u03b1 \u03b1\u03c5\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2 \u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c4\u03b1\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 ''' \u03ad\u03c7\u03c9 \u03b5\u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03b7\u03c2 \u03b1\u03bb\u03b2\u03b1\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae, \u03b3\u03b5\u03c1\u03bc\u03b1\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae, \u03b1\u03b6\u03c4\u03b5\u03ba\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae, \u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03c3\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03ba\u03b9\u03bd\u03ad\u03b6\u03b9\u03ba\u03b7, \u03ae \u03cc\u03c4\u03b9 \u03bc\u03b5 \u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c1\u03ce\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03bd \u03bf\u03b9 \u0395\u03bb\u03bf\u03c7\u03af\u03bc \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03b7 \u039c\u039f\u03a3\u0391\u039d\u03a4''' \u03b7 '''\u03a0\u03bf\u03b9\u03cc\u03c2 \u03bd\u03bf\u03bc\u03af\u03b6\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03cc\u03c4\u03b9 \u03b5\u03af\u03c3\u03b1\u03b9 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03ad\u03c7\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c4\u03bf \u03b4\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03af\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1 \u03bd\u03b1 \u03b1\u03bc\u03c6\u03b9\u03c3\u03b2\u03b7\u03c4\u03b5\u03af\u03c2 \u03c4\u03bf \u03b1\u03bd \u03b5\u03af\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 \u0388\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b1\u03c2 \u03ae \u03cc\u03c7\u03b9? \u039c\u03b5 \u03be\u03ad\u03c1\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b9 \u03b1\u03c0\u03cc \u03c7\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2? \u0388\u03c7\u03c9 \u03b1\u03bd\u03c4\u03b9\u03bc\u03b5\u03c4\u03c9\u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9 \u03b1\u03c1\u03ba\u03b5\u03c4\u03ad\u03c2 \u03bc\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1\u03ba\u03af\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b1\u03c0\u03cc \u03be\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03c3\u03c4\u03b7 \u03b6\u03c9\u03ae \u03bc\u03bf\u03c5 \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c7\u03ac\u03c1\u03b7 \u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03ac\u03b4\u03b1\u03c2''' \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 ''' \u039c\u03b5 \u03ba\u03ac\u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd \u03c0\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c3\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03ba\u03bf\u03c3\u03bc\u03ac\u03c1\u03b1 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 \u03cc\u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03bf\u03c2 \u03b4\u03b9\u03b1\u03c6\u03c9\u03bd\u03b5\u03af \u03bc\u03b1\u03b6\u03af \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 \u03ae \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03c0\u03b1\u03b8\u03b5\u03af \u03bd\u03b1 \u03b5\u03c6\u03b1\u03c1\u03bc\u03cc\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9 \u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03b9\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03ad\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03bd\u03b9\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03cd\u03c2'''   !  \u039c\u039f\u039d\u039f \u0395\u039d\u0391\u03a3 \u039c\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u0396\u039f\u03a5\u039e\u0397\u03a3 \u03a0\u0391\u039a\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039d\u039f\u03a3 \u0398\u0391 \u03a4\u0399\u03a3 \u0395\u0393\u03a1\u0391\u03a6\u0395 !\u03c7\u03b1\u03b1\u03c7\u03b1\u03c7\u03b1!!   -- +++$+++ ::Sorry που επεμβαινω,αλλα αυτες τις προτασεις ''' έχω επίσης αλβανική, γερμανική, αζτεκική, περσική και κινέζικη, ή ότι με πληρώνουν οι Ελοχίμ και η ΜΟΣΑΝΤ''' η '''Ποιός νομίζεις ότι είσαι και έχεις το δικαίωμα να αμφισβητείς το αν είμαι Έλληνας ή όχι? Με ξέρεις κι από χτες? Έχω αντιμετωπίσει αρκετές μαλακίες από ξένους στη ζωή μου για χάρη της Ελλάδας''' και ''' Με κάποιον που στην κοσμάρα του όποιος διαφωνεί μαζί του ή προσπαθεί να εφαρμόσει τις πολιτικές και τους κανονισμούς'''   !  ΜΟΝΟ ΕΝΑΣ ΜΠΟΥΖΟΥΞΗΣ ΠΑΚΙΣΤΑΝΟΣ ΘΑ ΤΙΣ ΕΓΡΑΦΕ !χααχαχα!!   --[[User:PartaMou|PartaMou]] ([[User talk:PartaMou|talk]]) 23:51, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
4221 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4217 +++$+++ 4220 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310194800E09 +++$+++ This one's been blocked too.  +++$+++ ::: This one's been blocked too. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 00:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

266364 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-17 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.171714500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your detailed explanation on my Talk Page. It is good to make your acquaintance! Yes, I think we do have some things in common. If you ever need any help with ancient Indian historical matters please do not hesitate to contact me - I may be able to help - especially if it involves the Kushan Empire in any way. I may get back to you for time to time on advice on how to make a page ready for an FA application! All best wishes.  +++$+++ Thanks for your detailed explanation on my Talk Page. It is good to make your acquaintance! Yes, I think we do have some things in common. If you ever need any help with ancient Indian historical matters please do not hesitate to contact me - I may be able to help - especially if it involves the Kushan Empire in any way. I may get back to you for time to time on advice on how to make a page ready for an FA application! All best wishes. [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 04:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
266365 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266364 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.171717020E09 +++$+++ Nice to see you chipping away. +++$+++ ::Nice to see you chipping away.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 04:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
266366 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266364 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.171795620E09 +++$+++ Sea routes-->This map refers to the early centuries of the first Millennium as it shows \"Andhras\" (Satavahanas).thanks. +++$+++ ::Sea routes-->This map refers to the early centuries of the first Millennium as it shows "Andhras" (Satavahanas).thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

4222 +++$+++ Xythianos +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.311579420E09 +++$+++ Again, why must you revert the whole page for a couple of words? Did you not see I had made other contributions to other sections? I find it as also being both unfair and biased, how you would like this article to refer to Xerxes the Great's conquering of Greece as an \"invasion\", but Alexander's subsequent invasion of Persia as \"conquering\". Remember you have to keep a NPOV. And your argument in the edit summary holds no value, because Xerxes DID conquer Greece. Yes, Alexander also did conquered Persia, but only years later. So please don't revert an edit without READING ALL THE CHANGED MADE first, and please try to keep a neutral point of view at all times. Thanks a lot. -- +++$+++ Again, why must you revert the whole page for a couple of words? Did you not see I had made other contributions to other sections? I find it as also being both unfair and biased, how you would like this article to refer to Xerxes the Great's conquering of Greece as an "invasion", but Alexander's subsequent invasion of Persia as "conquering". Remember you have to keep a NPOV. And your argument in the edit summary holds no value, because Xerxes DID conquer Greece. Yes, Alexander also did conquered Persia, but only years later. So please don't revert an edit without READING ALL THE CHANGED MADE first, and please try to keep a neutral point of view at all times. Thanks a lot. --[[User:Xythianos|Xythianos]] ([[User talk:Xythianos|talk]]) 00:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
4223 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4222 +++$+++ 4222 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.311580080E09 +++$+++ Newsflash: Persia lost the [[Greco-Persian Wars]], so no, it didn't \"conquer\" Greece. Deal with it. As for NPOV, you call this ''[[Persia]] was a cradle of science in earlier times. [[Persian science|Ancient Persians]] contributed to the current understanding of [[nature]], [[medicine]], [[mathematics]], and [[philosophy]]...'' NPOV? I suggest you read [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:PEACOCK]]. Also, your addition is completely unsourced, and therefore [[WP:OR]]. As for the contributions to algebra and chemistry, yes, those are notable, but they occurred in the '''medieval''' period (2nd millennium AD), while this article is about ancient history (i.e. nothing past the Islamic conquest.  +++$+++ :Newsflash: Persia lost the [[Greco-Persian Wars]], so no, it didn't "conquer" Greece. Deal with it. As for NPOV, you call this ''[[Persia]] was a cradle of science in earlier times. [[Persian science|Ancient Persians]] contributed to the current understanding of [[nature]], [[medicine]], [[mathematics]], and [[philosophy]]...'' NPOV? I suggest you read [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:PEACOCK]]. Also, your addition is completely unsourced, and therefore [[WP:OR]]. As for the contributions to algebra and chemistry, yes, those are notable, but they occurred in the '''medieval''' period (2nd millennium AD), while this article is about ancient history (i.e. nothing past the Islamic conquest. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 00:48, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

266367 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.171793580E09 +++$+++ We don't claim [[Wikipedia:Fair use]] on maps, since we can always draw our own.  Ask [[User:ChrisO]] nicely; he's quite good at them.  Or try it yourself.  Unless you're already proficient with image software, the first one will take a very long time.  But they're much easier after that first one.  You should be able to find a map on Commons that has the section outlined in order to start you off.   +++$+++ We don't claim [[Wikipedia:Fair use]] on maps, since we can always draw our own.  Ask [[User:ChrisO]] nicely; he's quite good at them.  Or try it yourself.  Unless you're already proficient with image software, the first one will take a very long time.  But they're much easier after that first one.  You should be able to find a map on Commons that has the section outlined in order to start you off.  [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 02:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
266368 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266367 +++$+++ 266367 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.171795560E09 +++$+++ I use [[GIMP]] for image editing.  I'd be willing to bet that someone at the [[Wikipedia:Reference desk]] would be able to tell you exactly what the best image editing software for drawing maps for your particular OS is.  Seriously.   +++$+++ :I use [[GIMP]] for image editing.  I'd be willing to bet that someone at the [[Wikipedia:Reference desk]] would be able to tell you exactly what the best image editing software for drawing maps for your particular OS is.  Seriously.  [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 02:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

4224 +++$+++ Xythianos +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.311581460E09 +++$+++ Hello? Have you heard of the [[Battle of Thermopylae]] and others wars that the Persians decisively won against the Greeks? Also, there is a reason why they're called Greco-Persian War\"S\", emphasis on the \"s\" at the end. You cannot decide an overall victor for a series of something. And how did Greece \"free itself from Persian rule\" if it wasn't CONQUERED by Persia in the first place? I don't get your logic, and by the way, the difference between the words \"invasion\" and \"conquering\" is ethnic bias. In order to separate facts from one's CULTURAL perception, you have to see things objectively. That's how you remove your own individual bias(es). You know, we Persians call Alexander's \"conquering\" an invasion, and you Greeks call Xerxes' conquering an invasion... do you get it?-- +++$+++ Hello? Have you heard of the [[Battle of Thermopylae]] and others wars that the Persians decisively won against the Greeks? Also, there is a reason why they're called Greco-Persian War"S", emphasis on the "s" at the end. You cannot decide an overall victor for a series of something. And how did Greece "free itself from Persian rule" if it wasn't CONQUERED by Persia in the first place? I don't get your logic, and by the way, the difference between the words "invasion" and "conquering" is ethnic bias. In order to separate facts from one's CULTURAL perception, you have to see things objectively. That's how you remove your own individual bias(es). You know, we Persians call Alexander's "conquering" an invasion, and you Greeks call Xerxes' conquering an invasion... do you get it?--[[User:Xythianos|Xythianos]] ([[User talk:Xythianos|talk]]) 01:11, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
4225 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4224 +++$+++ 4224 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.311592680E09 +++$+++ Mmmmm yes, you sound like a paragon of objectivity. Have you heard of the [[Battle of Salamis]] and the [[Battle of Plataea]] or just Thermopylae? In case you haven't heard of them, we have two excellent articles about them right here on wikipedia. Now, if you are going try to claim that the Greco-Persian Wars ended in a Persian victory and the conquest of Greece, let me know so I can stop wasting my time with this discussion. I never claimed that Greece freed itself from Persian rule, just that after Salamis and Plataea, the threat to Greece of a Persian invasion ended once and for all. Yes, Persia ''invaded'' Greece, but it never conquered it. It did conquer [[Ionia]], which was however freed at the conclusion of the Wars. That, however is another story.  +++$+++ :Mmmmm yes, you sound like a paragon of objectivity. Have you heard of the [[Battle of Salamis]] and the [[Battle of Plataea]] or just Thermopylae? In case you haven't heard of them, we have two excellent articles about them right here on wikipedia. Now, if you are going try to claim that the Greco-Persian Wars ended in a Persian victory and the conquest of Greece, let me know so I can stop wasting my time with this discussion. I never claimed that Greece freed itself from Persian rule, just that after Salamis and Plataea, the threat to Greece of a Persian invasion ended once and for all. Yes, Persia ''invaded'' Greece, but it never conquered it. It did conquer [[Ionia]], which was however freed at the conclusion of the Wars. That, however is another story. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 04:18, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

266370 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.171817520E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 08:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
266371 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266370 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.171848060E09 +++$+++ I think those who are interested in Kannada poetry will eventually get down to it. Does her place of residence matter? +++$+++ ::I think those who are interested in Kannada poetry will eventually get down to it. Does her place of residence matter?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
266372 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266370 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.171849260E09 +++$+++ Do you think it may have been removed for privacy reasons? If so then it is probably ok. +++$+++ ::Do you think it may have been removed for privacy reasons? If so then it is probably ok.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
266373 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266370 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.171850280E09 +++$+++ I have not heard of her, but that does not mean she is not good. Probably because Kannada language is such a giant in literature in India it takes one to be really famous to beheard. Also it could be that she is still young, has not won any big awards (Sahitya academy)? However it looked good in the Kannada poets section. I believe [[User:Sarvagnya]] was handling the Kannada poets template. Maybe he can make sure it stays in that cateogry. +++$+++ ::I have not heard of her, but that does not mean she is not good. Probably because Kannada language is such a giant in literature in India it takes one to be really famous to beheard. Also it could be that she is still young, has not won any big awards (Sahitya academy)? However it looked good in the Kannada poets section. I believe [[User:Sarvagnya]] was handling the Kannada poets template. Maybe he can make sure it stays in that cateogry.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
266374 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266370 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.171850340E09 +++$+++ We should create a category called \"contemporary or modern Kannada poets\" +++$+++ ::We should create a category called "contemporary or modern Kannada poets"[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

4227 +++$+++ Alexikoua +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4227 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311686760E09 +++$+++ After Pakashem's new block a new meat\/sock has taken action, by removing terms like N. Epirus etc in all articles. Although it might be a sign that this is another off wiki mobilized user, this seems to me more like an old blocked user on a revenge mision. +++$+++ After Pakashem's new block a new meat/sock has taken action, by removing terms like N. Epirus etc in all articles. Although it might be a sign that this is another off wiki mobilized user, this seems to me more like an old blocked user on a revenge mision.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 06:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
4228 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4227 +++$+++ 4227 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311686940E09 +++$+++ Not yet convinced this is a Pakapsock.  +++$+++ :Not yet convinced this is a Pakapsock. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 06:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
4229 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ 4227 +++$+++ 4227 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.311687180E09 +++$+++ By the way, I'm having some trouble over at [[Ancient history]] with a Persian nationalist [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAthenean&action=historysubmit&diff=441447967&oldid=441289189] who insists on replacing Salamis and Plataea with Thermopylae [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ancient_history&action=historysubmit&diff=441455964&oldid=441425746], for no other reason than Thermopylae is a Persian victory, even though the other two are far more significant.  +++$+++ :By the way, I'm having some trouble over at [[Ancient history]] with a Persian nationalist [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAthenean&action=historysubmit&diff=441447967&oldid=441289189] who insists on replacing Salamis and Plataea with Thermopylae [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ancient_history&action=historysubmit&diff=441455964&oldid=441425746], for no other reason than Thermopylae is a Persian victory, even though the other two are far more significant. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean#top|talk]]) 06:33, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

266375 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.171857720E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 20:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
266376 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266375 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.171860240E09 +++$+++ You are right. It all comes under literature but for convinience, may be poets and literature could be seperated, medieval and modern should be seperated. I am having a comm with [[user:Gnanapiti]] on that now. He i believe handles this. +++$+++ ::You are right. It all comes under literature but for convinience, may be poets and literature could be seperated, medieval and modern should be seperated. I am having a comm with [[user:Gnanapiti]] on that now. He i believe handles this.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

4232 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ Russavia +++$+++ 4232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.311895980E09 +++$+++ Why did you do [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Aviaci%C3%B3n_Del_Noroeste&diff=prev&oldid=441892816 this]? The content removed was a very poor machine translation, and tidying it without the original source would be very difficult, surely its better off stubbed and built up from that? Or are you planning on tidying it yourself?-- +++$+++ Why did you do [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aviaci%C3%B3n_Del_Noroeste&diff=prev&oldid=441892816 this]? The content removed was a very poor machine translation, and tidying it without the original source would be very difficult, surely its better off stubbed and built up from that? Or are you planning on tidying it yourself?--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 16:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
4233 +++$+++ Russavia +++$+++ Russavia +++$+++ 4232 +++$+++ 4232 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311897480E09 +++$+++ I did this because the reference is clearly given, but the text is in need of accurate translation. This is noted by the template at the top of the page which makes that notice known. I don't agree with your machine translation, as there are also spelling errors in the English output. Either way, we don't work on a schedule, and the information can be fixed in due course by ANYONE. But as there is clearly a reference given in the article, the rest is merely marked for cleanup. And it should be treated as such. And no, I am not planning on tidying it up myself, but neither do I plan on simply gutting the article. -- +++$+++ :I did this because the reference is clearly given, but the text is in need of accurate translation. This is noted by the template at the top of the page which makes that notice known. I don't agree with your machine translation, as there are also spelling errors in the English output. Either way, we don't work on a schedule, and the information can be fixed in due course by ANYONE. But as there is clearly a reference given in the article, the rest is merely marked for cleanup. And it should be treated as such. And no, I am not planning on tidying it up myself, but neither do I plan on simply gutting the article. --[[User:Russavia|Russavia]] <sup>[[User talk:Russavia|Let's dialogue]]</sup> 16:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
4234 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ Russavia +++$+++ 4232 +++$+++ 4233 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.311898020E09 +++$+++ I didn't remove any reference, and I don't know what you mean when you say you disagree with my machine translation. Tidying a bad translation is very difficult, even more so when we don't have the original untranslated content. By removing the block of unintelligible content, it leaves a clear and understandable stub, which can be expanded upon much more easily. The removal of bad translations is a common occurrence, and one which is better for the project than leaving a block of what is basically gibberish-- +++$+++ ::I didn't remove any reference, and I don't know what you mean when you say you disagree with my machine translation. Tidying a bad translation is very difficult, even more so when we don't have the original untranslated content. By removing the block of unintelligible content, it leaves a clear and understandable stub, which can be expanded upon much more easily. The removal of bad translations is a common occurrence, and one which is better for the project than leaving a block of what is basically gibberish--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 17:07, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

266377 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.171860240E09 +++$+++ thanks. +++$+++ thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
266378 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266377 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-19 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.171877400E09 +++$+++ The lure of wealth and housing was more at a middle class or upper middle class level. They were typically given a few acres of land (I guess, though no specific acreage has been mentioned). If a Brahmin priest of high knowledge performed an important ritual or an important and accurate astrological prediction to rise the status\/power\/fortune of nobility or Kings, they were given much more land\/endowements. But they rarely reached the level of wealth of wealthy landlords, Feudal Barnos (arasa) etc. I am sure from what I read that there were wealthy Brahmins who were into Horse trading on the western sea board, wetland farming and in powerful administrative positions etc, but generally their wealth came from royal endowments. The exact nature of the endowments are not mentioned in my books though and one can only guess. As my citation says, they were mostly into literary\/intellectual persuits. +++$+++ ::The lure of wealth and housing was more at a middle class or upper middle class level. They were typically given a few acres of land (I guess, though no specific acreage has been mentioned). If a Brahmin priest of high knowledge performed an important ritual or an important and accurate astrological prediction to rise the status/power/fortune of nobility or Kings, they were given much more land/endowements. But they rarely reached the level of wealth of wealthy landlords, Feudal Barnos (arasa) etc. I am sure from what I read that there were wealthy Brahmins who were into Horse trading on the western sea board, wetland farming and in powerful administrative positions etc, but generally their wealth came from royal endowments. The exact nature of the endowments are not mentioned in my books though and one can only guess. As my citation says, they were mostly into literary/intellectual persuits.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
266379 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266377 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-19 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.171878060E09 +++$+++ AMD\/INTEL all meet similar requirements and compete. The price diff will by ~$50. BTW, something went wrong in Society section of Western Chalukyas. (my fault). The three works of music related literature were not written by women. I had it in the wrong place.I will correct it. +++$+++ ::AMD/INTEL all meet similar requirements and compete. The price diff will by ~$50. BTW, something went wrong in Society section of Western Chalukyas. (my fault). The three works of music related literature were not written by women. I had it in the wrong place.I will correct it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
266380 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266377 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-19 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.171879260E09 +++$+++ I took care of the problem. I added some more new info to the literature section as well. Do you think it fits there? +++$+++ ::I took care of the problem. I added some more new info to the literature section as well. Do you think it fits there?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

4238 +++$+++ Snowmanradio +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310443680E09 +++$+++ Re: [[:File:Ardea sumatrana - Daintree River.jpg]]. This image is a juvenile, so I have removed it from the infobox. See discussion at Bird 1243.  +++$+++ Re: [[:File:Ardea sumatrana - Daintree River.jpg]]. This image is a juvenile, so I have removed it from the infobox. See discussion at Bird 1243. [[User:Snowmanradio|Snowman]] ([[User talk:Snowmanradio|talk]]) 21:08, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
4239 +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4238 +++$+++ 4238 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.310449020E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ *Thanks. [[User:JJ Harrison|JJ Harrison]] ([[User talk:JJ Harrison#top|talk]]) 22:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
4240 +++$+++ Snowmanradio +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4238 +++$+++ 4239 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.310484840E09 +++$+++ Commons only has two images of this large species including your new photograph, which is a welcome addition. If the article was a bit longer, your image should be shown in the article as well, but the article is only a Stub and it does not have much room for extra images. I have added a signpost template at the bottom of the Stub to commons, so that both images can be easily assessed.  I have searched Flickr and Picasa Web Albums using several different search terms without finding any more Commons friendly photographs of this species so far. +++$+++ :*Commons only has two images of this large species including your new photograph, which is a welcome addition. If the article was a bit longer, your image should be shown in the article as well, but the article is only a Stub and it does not have much room for extra images. I have added a signpost template at the bottom of the Stub to commons, so that both images can be easily assessed.  I have searched Flickr and Picasa Web Albums using several different search terms without finding any more Commons friendly photographs of this species so far.[[User:Snowmanradio|Snowman]] ([[User talk:Snowmanradio|talk]]) 08:34, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

266383 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-19 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.171915260E09 +++$+++ The bot didn't archive my page though. Is it set up so it will the next time around? Thanks!  -- +++$+++ The bot didn't archive my page though. Is it set up so it will the next time around? Thanks!  --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 12:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
266384 +++$+++ Essjay +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266383 +++$+++ 266383 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.171967280E09 +++$+++ It did, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=109246994&oldid=109246918 here] though it was only one post; I wanted to make sure that it was working. <tt>:)<\/tt> The next time the page needs archiving, the bot should catch it in it's automatic runs. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ :It did, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=109246994&oldid=109246918 here] though it was only one post; I wanted to make sure that it was working. <tt>:)</tt> The next time the page needs archiving, the bot should catch it in it's automatic runs. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Essjay|<font color="#7b68ee">'''Essjay'''</font>]] [[User talk:Essjay|<font color="#7b68ee">(<small>Talk</small>)</font>]]</span> 02:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

4241 +++$+++ Dvincleo +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4241 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311215400E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Appreciate  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Appreciate [[User:Dvincleo|Dvincleo]] ([[User talk:Dvincleo|talk]]) 19:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
4242 +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4241 +++$+++ 4241 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311312300E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ *Thanks. [[User:JJ Harrison|JJ Harrison]] ([[User talk:JJ Harrison#top|talk]]) 22:25, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
4243 +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4241 +++$+++ 4241 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311312300E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ *Thanks. [[User:JJ Harrison|JJ Harrison]] ([[User talk:JJ Harrison#top|talk]]) 22:25, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

528530 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528530 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-09 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.141966500E09 +++$+++ I'll keep an eye out for anything too.  +++$+++ I'll keep an eye out for anything too. [[User:Royalbroil|Royalbroil]] 20:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
528531 +++$+++ Barno +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528530 +++$+++ 528530 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.143025380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for posting that 1972 program cover.  That was his first Pinto-bodied car, I believe, after years of coupes.   +++$+++ *Thanks for posting that 1972 program cover.  That was his first Pinto-bodied car, I believe, after years of coupes.  [[User:Barno|Barno]] 03:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
528532 +++$+++ Barno +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528530 +++$+++ 528531 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.143070620E09 +++$+++ Re: your note on my user page, I've never been to Eastern Wisconsin's dirt tracks (just Capital Super Speedway in Madison, then known as Impact Speedway), but I agree there's a strong racing heritage there.  I grew up at both the dirt and paved tracks in upstate New York, another longtime hotbed of the sport.  Like you, I appreciate the sport's heritage enough that I intend to keep improving our articles in those areas.   +++$+++ **Re: your note on my user page, I've never been to Eastern Wisconsin's dirt tracks (just Capital Super Speedway in Madison, then known as Impact Speedway), but I agree there's a strong racing heritage there.  I grew up at both the dirt and paved tracks in upstate New York, another longtime hotbed of the sport.  Like you, I appreciate the sport's heritage enough that I intend to keep improving our articles in those areas.  [[User:Barno|Barno]] 15:37, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

266388 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.172019300E09 +++$+++ I got a positive note from [[user:Nichalp]] (who was away from a while I guess) about how he feels about the article. He says go for FA review. I am moving it today. I need you to partner me as always. +++$+++ I got a positive note from [[user:Nichalp]] (who was away from a while I guess) about how he feels about the article. He says go for FA review. I am moving it today. I need you to partner me as always.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 16:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
266389 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266388 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.172099640E09 +++$+++ I have emailed you a reply. +++$+++ ::I have emailed you a reply.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
266390 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266388 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.172101500E09 +++$+++ Hi. If you know how to draw maps, I have a few that need to be drawn. The Rashtrakuta territories at their peak (the current one is the core area), Gangas and Kadambas territories. I can scan and email the maps to you when you are ready. +++$+++ ::Hi. If you know how to draw maps, I have a few that need to be drawn. The Rashtrakuta territories at their peak (the current one is the core area), Gangas and Kadambas territories. I can scan and email the maps to you when you are ready.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

4247 +++$+++ 58.175.33.226 +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311533880E09 +++$+++ Just wondering where you purchased this from: http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File:Pop_Up_Blind_with_Camera.jpg Cheers, --[[Special:Contributions\/58.175.33.226|58.175.33.226]] ( +++$+++ Just wondering where you purchased this from: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Pop_Up_Blind_with_Camera.jpg Cheers, --[[Special:Contributions/58.175.33.226|58.175.33.226]] ([[User talk:58.175.33.226|talk]]) 11:58, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
4248 +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4247 +++$+++ 4247 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311570480E09 +++$+++ From [http:\/\/www.ebay.com.au\/itm\/Hunting-Blind-Bird-Watching-Hide-Full-Camouflage-\/320730498313?pt=AU_Hunting&hash=item4aad070509#ht_1255wt_1139 this guy]. The design isn't perfect (I wish the window would open a little lower and it was lighter), but it is fairly well constructed etc.   +++$+++ *From [http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Hunting-Blind-Bird-Watching-Hide-Full-Camouflage-/320730498313?pt=AU_Hunting&hash=item4aad070509#ht_1255wt_1139 this guy]. The design isn't perfect (I wish the window would open a little lower and it was lighter), but it is fairly well constructed etc.  [[User:JJ Harrison|JJ Harrison]] ([[User talk:JJ Harrison#top|talk]]) 22:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
4249 +++$+++ 58.175.33.226 +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4247 +++$+++ 4248 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.311579720E09 +++$+++ Cool thanks; and how effective do you find the blind is? Do you combine it with recorded bird calls? --[[Special:Contributions\/58.175.33.226|58.175.33.226]] ( +++$+++ **Cool thanks; and how effective do you find the blind is? Do you combine it with recorded bird calls? --[[Special:Contributions/58.175.33.226|58.175.33.226]] ([[User talk:58.175.33.226|talk]]) 00:42, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
4250 +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4247 +++$+++ 4249 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.311613020E09 +++$+++ Very effective. Provided you set it up when the subjects don't see you, then they will come very close. Recorded bird calls are only really going to work for territorial species (some honeyeaters for example), I rarely make use of them. Some observation can often suggest good spots. Geolocating your IP address suggests you are in Canberra or Queanbeyan, if this is true, then given how dry much of the bush is, setting up near a waterhole or other source of fresh water might be your best bet for bush birds.  +++$+++ ***Very effective. Provided you set it up when the subjects don't see you, then they will come very close. Recorded bird calls are only really going to work for territorial species (some honeyeaters for example), I rarely make use of them. Some observation can often suggest good spots. Geolocating your IP address suggests you are in Canberra or Queanbeyan, if this is true, then given how dry much of the bush is, setting up near a waterhole or other source of fresh water might be your best bet for bush birds. [[User:JJ Harrison|JJ Harrison]] ([[User talk:JJ Harrison#top|talk]]) 09:57, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
4251 +++$+++ 58.175.33.226 +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4247 +++$+++ 4250 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311752040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the advice! Few more questions: I know this will depend on many factors, but how long do you need to sit and wait in the hide before anything interesting comes along? Are we talking 30 mins, 2 hrs, 1\/2 day? In terms of choosing a spot, what other things do you look for? You mention it's important for the bird not to see you set it up, so I'm guessing it would be futile to spot the bird go to where it was (before it flew off upon seeing you) and then set up there and wait? Also is it necessary to have the hide semi-\"submerged\" in surrounding bush or can you just have it more or less in the open? --[[Special:Contributions\/58.175.33.226|58.175.33.226]] ( +++$+++ ****Thanks for the advice! Few more questions: I know this will depend on many factors, but how long do you need to sit and wait in the hide before anything interesting comes along? Are we talking 30 mins, 2 hrs, 1/2 day? In terms of choosing a spot, what other things do you look for? You mention it's important for the bird not to see you set it up, so I'm guessing it would be futile to spot the bird go to where it was (before it flew off upon seeing you) and then set up there and wait? Also is it necessary to have the hide semi-"submerged" in surrounding bush or can you just have it more or less in the open? --[[Special:Contributions/58.175.33.226|58.175.33.226]] ([[User talk:58.175.33.226|talk]]) 00:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
4252 +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4247 +++$+++ 4251 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 06:54:00 +++$+++ 1.311774840E09 +++$+++ I meant that if you set it up whilst the birds are close, then the noise and so on will probably flush them. It probably doesn't matter for many birds if they see you put it up from some distance away. The kingfisher above would have seen me put it up from about 25 meters away. Scaring the birds off to plonk down a hide is unlikely to be a successful strategy (you'd probably have to wait longer if they come back at all), you are better off making observations, then putting it down strategically when there is a gap in the action. Some birds, like robins or kingfishers often have favorite perches, setting up at one of those when they go elsewhere is probably a reasonable bet. Flowering plants, such as Grevillias, Banksias or Hakeas are often a good bet for Honeyeaters and lorikeets. The waiting time varies hugely, the kingfisher was maybe 1.5 hours to get that shot, but I spent about 2.5 in the hide. I had to wait about an hour for [[:File:Rhyacornis fuliginosus - Doi Inthanon.jpg]], whilst other times action can occur within minutes. If you pick good spots you shouldn't have to wait too long.  +++$+++ *****I meant that if you set it up whilst the birds are close, then the noise and so on will probably flush them. It probably doesn't matter for many birds if they see you put it up from some distance away. The kingfisher above would have seen me put it up from about 25 meters away. Scaring the birds off to plonk down a hide is unlikely to be a successful strategy (you'd probably have to wait longer if they come back at all), you are better off making observations, then putting it down strategically when there is a gap in the action. Some birds, like robins or kingfishers often have favorite perches, setting up at one of those when they go elsewhere is probably a reasonable bet. Flowering plants, such as Grevillias, Banksias or Hakeas are often a good bet for Honeyeaters and lorikeets. The waiting time varies hugely, the kingfisher was maybe 1.5 hours to get that shot, but I spent about 2.5 in the hide. I had to wait about an hour for [[:File:Rhyacornis fuliginosus - Doi Inthanon.jpg]], whilst other times action can occur within minutes. If you pick good spots you shouldn't have to wait too long. [[User:JJ Harrison|JJ Harrison]] ([[User talk:JJ Harrison#top|talk]]) 06:54, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

584987 +++$+++ Dust Filter +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-26 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.204079640E09 +++$+++ Cheers  +++$+++ Cheers [[User:Dust Filter|Dust Filter]] ([[User talk:Dust Filter|talk]]) 18:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
584988 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584987 +++$+++ 584987 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.204079700E09 +++$+++ You're welcome!  +++$+++ :You're welcome! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

266393 +++$+++ AzaBot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-22 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.172214360E09 +++$+++ |}  +++$+++ |} [[User:AzaBot|AzaBot]] 23:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
266394 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266393 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.172228160E09 +++$+++ In Hoysala architecture, The word \"clockwise circumabulation\" may be confusing. The book mentions right to left. So we should probably stick to the term. +++$+++ ::In Hoysala architecture, The word "clockwise circumabulation" may be confusing. The book mentions right to left. So we should probably stick to the term.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
266395 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266393 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.172228940E09 +++$+++ No, I did not change anything pertaining to \"clockwise\". Infact I have explained in the review that the term clockwise has been used for clarification purpose, to make it easier to understand. The reviewer had some doubts thats all. I am sure if he has more doubts, we can request him to look at the wikilinked page you created for circumabulation.Hope you are not upset by this query. No need to go to another topic as of yet, unless you want to. This will take another 3 weeks I think. +++$+++ ::No, I did not change anything pertaining to "clockwise". Infact I have explained in the review that the term clockwise has been used for clarification purpose, to make it easier to understand. The reviewer had some doubts thats all. I am sure if he has more doubts, we can request him to look at the wikilinked page you created for circumabulation.Hope you are not upset by this query. No need to go to another topic as of yet, unless you want to. This will take another 3 weeks I think.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

528538 +++$+++ Nv8200p +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-01 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.143896760E09 +++$+++ I have added my experience with why I have to delete images. Hope it helps. I may add more as I come across new cases. -Regards  +++$+++ I have added my experience with why I have to delete images. Hope it helps. I may add more as I come across new cases. -Regards [[User:Nv8200p|Nv8200p]] [[User_talk:Nv8200p|talk]] 05:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
528539 +++$+++ Nv8200p +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528538 +++$+++ 528538 +++$+++ 2006-04-01 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.143961500E09 +++$+++ Added photo hosting sites like flickr as Item 5. - +++$+++ :Added photo hosting sites like flickr as Item 5. -[[User:Nv8200p|Nv8200p]] [[User_talk:Nv8200p|talk]] 23:05, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

266397 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.172218560E09 +++$+++ '''Reply'''-> I have tried to clarify this after reading the line in my book. The term clockwise (which has been used for clarity and does not apear in my book) must be seen as a top view. When a devotee gets on to the jagati, the devotee starts walking towards his\/her left to see the sequence of scenes (my book calls it \"right to left sequence of epic scenes in the direction of circumabulation\". +++$+++ '''Reply'''-> I have tried to clarify this after reading the line in my book. The term clockwise (which has been used for clarity and does not apear in my book) must be seen as a top view. When a devotee gets on to the jagati, the devotee starts walking towards his/her left to see the sequence of scenes (my book calls it "right to left sequence of epic scenes in the direction of circumabulation".[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
266398 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266397 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.172231460E09 +++$+++ Sorry, the word '''clockwise''' does appear on page 25 in my book. I will make this correction on the review page.I should not have been so hasty in answering the reviewers question. +++$+++ ::Sorry, the word '''clockwise''' does appear on page 25 in my book. I will make this correction on the review page.I should not have been so hasty in answering the reviewers question.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
266399 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266397 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.172289780E09 +++$+++ Do you recall I had once mentioned that we should provide a temple sketch with labeled parts. The revewier has requested for one (on my talk page). We need to figure out how to do this if possible. My book may have a sketch in the back which I can scan. But to hand re-draw with a computer tool, we need to find someone who has the software. But since this request is not on the FAC page, it may not be absolutely necessary right now. +++$+++ ::Do you recall I had once mentioned that we should provide a temple sketch with labeled parts. The revewier has requested for one (on my talk page). We need to figure out how to do this if possible. My book may have a sketch in the back which I can scan. But to hand re-draw with a computer tool, we need to find someone who has the software. But since this request is not on the FAC page, it may not be absolutely necessary right now.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
266400 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266397 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.172290020E09 +++$+++ Makes sense. Go ahead and add it. It gives a basic description of what a Hindu temple is about. I will answer the reviewrs other questions tonight in the FAC page. You may proceed with simplyfying the complicated words with (bracketed) meanings though. +++$+++ ::Makes sense. Go ahead and add it. It gives a basic description of what a Hindu temple is about. I will answer the reviewrs other questions tonight in the FAC page. You may proceed with simplyfying the complicated words with (bracketed) meanings though.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
266401 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266397 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.172302140E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I made several seperate edits to answer the reviewers questions. I tried to save it at the same time you saved your latest edit. So we got a conflict. Since your latest edit was a move, it would be easier for you to redo it, then for me to retype all my edits. Do you mind if I save my edits which means you will have to redo your paragraph move edit. +++$+++ ::Mattisse, I made several seperate edits to answer the reviewers questions. I tried to save it at the same time you saved your latest edit. So we got a conflict. Since your latest edit was a move, it would be easier for you to redo it, then for me to retype all my edits. Do you mind if I save my edits which means you will have to redo your paragraph move edit.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
266402 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266397 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.172302560E09 +++$+++ Actually why dont you leave your edits alone. I will just revert my edits and start over.? +++$+++ ::Actually why dont you leave your edits alone. I will just revert my edits and start over.?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
266403 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266397 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.172302740E09 +++$+++ I have added wordings and clarifications to Temple deities, Temple complex, pillars and Mantapa paragraphs, plus a citation. +++$+++ ::I have added wordings and clarifications to Temple deities, Temple complex, pillars and Mantapa paragraphs, plus a citation.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
266404 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266397 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.172302860E09 +++$+++ The conflict basically occured because we both tried to save at the same time. So the browser shows two versions of the article, the one I had before I started to work and the one I edited. I will check if I caught your edits first. +++$+++ ::The conflict basically occured because we both tried to save at the same time. So the browser shows two versions of the article, the one I had before I started to work and the one I edited. I will check if I caught your edits first.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
266405 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266397 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.172302920E09 +++$+++ I do not get your paragraph move. +++$+++ ::I do not get your paragraph move.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

4254 +++$+++ Snowmanradio +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.311816900E09 +++$+++ Re: [[:File:Calyptorhynchus funereus Bruny.jpg]] {{!}} See Bird 1258. This has been identified as an immature male cockatoo.  +++$+++ Re: [[:File:Calyptorhynchus funereus Bruny.jpg]] {{!}} See Bird 1258. This has been identified as an immature male cockatoo. [[User:Snowmanradio|Snowman]] ([[User talk:Snowmanradio|talk]]) 18:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
4255 +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4254 +++$+++ 4254 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311829680E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ *Thanks. [[User:JJ Harrison|JJ Harrison]] ([[User talk:JJ Harrison#top|talk]]) 22:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

4256 +++$+++ Sherif9282 +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.311836040E09 +++$+++ Hi there JJ Harrison! My friend came through and confirmed there were never any color versions of the photograph. Let me know your final opinion on the matter! -- +++$+++ Hi there JJ Harrison! My friend came through and confirmed there were never any color versions of the photograph. Let me know your final opinion on the matter! --[[User:Sherif9282|Sherif9282]] ([[User talk:Sherif9282|talk]]) 23:54, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
4257 +++$+++ The Egyptian Liberal +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4256 +++$+++ 4256 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.311914220E09 +++$+++ I replied to your comment --  +++$+++ :I replied to your comment -- [[User:The Egyptian Liberal|The Egyptian Liberal]] ([[User talk:The Egyptian Liberal|talk]]) 21:37, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
4258 +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ JJ Harrison +++$+++ 4256 +++$+++ 4257 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311965160E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'll probably reply tomorrow.  +++$+++ ::Thanks, I'll probably reply tomorrow. [[User:JJ Harrison|JJ Harrison]] ([[User talk:JJ Harrison#top|talk]]) 11:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

44400 +++$+++  +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-26 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.274866260E09 +++$+++ Hello, you noticed that I mentioned your name at a different user's (ASniper's) talk page, and kudos for noticing so quickly. Sorry if you saw it as a personal attack but I see it as a description of your very obvious philosophy at various controversial AfD's. So be it. I'll edit the post in question. I was trying to advise a volunteer editor (like you and me) on how to handle a difficult task. But do your research on other users. I've been a constantly active editor here for three years and don't need to be introduced to the Welcome page or rules on so-called personal attacks. Pointing me to those pages could very well be an example of the attitude I was talking about in that post with ASniper, but I'll assume you weren't trying to be condescending.  --<font face=\"Calibri\"> +++$+++ Hello, you noticed that I mentioned your name at a different user's (ASniper's) talk page, and kudos for noticing so quickly. Sorry if you saw it as a personal attack but I see it as a description of your very obvious philosophy at various controversial AfD's. So be it. I'll edit the post in question. I was trying to advise a volunteer editor (like you and me) on how to handle a difficult task. But do your research on other users. I've been a constantly active editor here for three years and don't need to be introduced to the Welcome page or rules on so-called personal attacks. Pointing me to those pages could very well be an example of the attitude I was talking about in that post with ASniper, but I'll assume you weren't trying to be condescending.  --<font face="Calibri">[[User:Doomsdayer520|<font color="MediumSeaGreen">'''D<small>OOMSDAYER</small>520'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Doomsdayer520|Talk]]|[[ Special:Contributions/Doomsdayer520|Contribs]])</font> 02:31, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
44401 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44400 +++$+++ 44400 +++$+++ 2010-05-26 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.274867340E09 +++$+++ Yes, I'm just crazy enough to see being called \"''inflexible, humorless, and condescending''\" as an attack. '''Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors.''' Thanks! -  +++$+++ :Yes, I'm just crazy enough to see being called "''inflexible, humorless, and condescending''" as an attack. '''Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors.''' Thanks! - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 02:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
44402 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44400 +++$+++ 44400 +++$+++ 2010-05-30 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.275213660E09 +++$+++ I \"insist on publishing\" encyclopedic information about Sanger, including the \"four counts of indecent assault and four of gross indecency, all against a boy under the age of 16\" and his sudden death immediately after facing court on those charges. This is an encyclopedia. We report significant verifiable information -- the good, the bad and the ugly. You'll also want to review my last edit to the article, adding to the list of Sanger's accomplishments. I am here neither to bury Sanger nor to praise him. I'm merely here to report on him. -  +++$+++ :I "insist on publishing" encyclopedic information about Sanger, including the "four counts of indecent assault and four of gross indecency, all against a boy under the age of 16" and his sudden death immediately after facing court on those charges. This is an encyclopedia. We report significant verifiable information -- the good, the bad and the ugly. You'll also want to review my last edit to the article, adding to the list of Sanger's accomplishments. I am here neither to bury Sanger nor to praise him. I'm merely here to report on him. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 03:01, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

528550 +++$+++ D-Day +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-09 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.147239120E09 +++$+++ And oh yes, about the barnstar. Simply brilliant. I think we should convert that into a template so it can be a standard barnstar for NASCAR-related edits. Maybe that can be the new image in the {{tl|WikiProject NASCAR}} template if it is legal. --[[User:D-Day|D-Day]]<sup>([[User talk:D-Day|Wouldn't]] [[User:D-Day\/Templates I'd like to see on Wikipedia|you]] [[Special:Contributions\/User:D-Day|like]] [[User:D-Day\/sandbox|to]] [[User:D-Day\/Userboxen|be]] [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">a pepper<\/font>]]  +++$+++ And oh yes, about the barnstar. Simply brilliant. I think we should convert that into a template so it can be a standard barnstar for NASCAR-related edits. Maybe that can be the new image in the {{tl|WikiProject NASCAR}} template if it is legal. --[[User:D-Day|D-Day]]<sup>([[User talk:D-Day|Wouldn't]] [[User:D-Day/Templates I'd like to see on Wikipedia|you]] [[Special:Contributions/User:D-Day|like]] [[User:D-Day/sandbox|to]] [[User:D-Day/Userboxen|be]] [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">a pepper</font>]] [[User:D-Day/You know you've been editing for too long on Wikipedia if...|too?]]</sup>) 22:32, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
528551 +++$+++ Barno +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528550 +++$+++ 528550 +++$+++ 2006-05-10 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.147247760E09 +++$+++ I've started an article in my userspace as User:Barno\/NASCAR Whelen Modified Tour.  Please look it over, add anything you can at the moment, and let me know whether I should release it into article space.  When I move it there, I'll add redirects from the Winston and Featherlite old names for the series.  Thanks for the All-Time Top 10 link; I used that for the \"Honors\" section.  NASCAR's site doesn't have the past champs in the regionalracingseries section of the website.  Can you help complete the history?  Thanks for your encouragement.   +++$+++ *I've started an article in my userspace as User:Barno/NASCAR Whelen Modified Tour.  Please look it over, add anything you can at the moment, and let me know whether I should release it into article space.  When I move it there, I'll add redirects from the Winston and Featherlite old names for the series.  Thanks for the All-Time Top 10 link; I used that for the "Honors" section.  NASCAR's site doesn't have the past champs in the regionalracingseries section of the website.  Can you help complete the history?  Thanks for your encouragement.  [[User:Barno|Barno]] 00:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
528552 +++$+++ Barno +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528550 +++$+++ 528551 +++$+++ 2006-05-15 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.147757880E09 +++$+++ It's been promoted to article space today.  I was able to get a friendly admin (JzG) to override the problem stemming from my mis-posting, without having it sit in Requested Moves for two or three more days.   +++$+++ **It's been promoted to article space today.  I was able to get a friendly admin (JzG) to override the problem stemming from my mis-posting, without having it sit in Requested Moves for two or three more days.  [[User:Barno|Barno]] 22:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
528553 +++$+++ Barno +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528550 +++$+++ 528552 +++$+++ 2006-05-18 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.147939020E09 +++$+++ I've gotten a thread started at www.modseriesscene.com where a number of historians of the Modifieds hang out.  Hopefully a couple of knowledgable people with good sources will join us, and maybe go on to help [[Wikipedia:WikiProject NASCAR]].   +++$+++ ***I've gotten a thread started at www.modseriesscene.com where a number of historians of the Modifieds hang out.  Hopefully a couple of knowledgable people with good sources will join us, and maybe go on to help [[Wikipedia:WikiProject NASCAR]].  [[User:Barno|Barno]] 00:57, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

266407 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.172303400E09 +++$+++ ;;Yes. I think so. +++$+++ ;;Yes. I think so.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
266408 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266407 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.172303820E09 +++$+++ Temple complex, Pillars, Mantapa +++$+++ ::Temple complex, Pillars, Mantapa[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
266409 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266407 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.172304000E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, never mind. When I see the diff I see too many changes in the \"your text version\". I shall redo all my work just to make sure I did not do something wrong. +++$+++ ::Mattisse, never mind. When I see the diff I see too many changes in the "your text version". I shall redo all my work just to make sure I did not do something wrong.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
266410 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266407 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.172304060E09 +++$+++ I did not save my edits. I will restart my edits now. I will let you know when I am done.. +++$+++ :: I did not save my edits. I will restart my edits now. I will let you know when I am done..[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
266411 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266407 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.172307360E09 +++$+++ I Put it back. +++$+++ ::I Put it back.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
266412 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266407 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.172311080E09 +++$+++ are the edits ok now. Sometimes I make mistakes in editing while attening to my kids at the same time. +++$+++ ::are the edits ok now. Sometimes I make mistakes in editing while attening to my kids at the same time.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
266413 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266407 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.172359140E09 +++$+++ No problem. We all have bad days. +++$+++ ::No problem. We all have bad days.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
266414 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266407 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.172371440E09 +++$+++ Your edits look fine. +++$+++ ::Your edits look fine.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

4264 +++$+++ K.O.K Kev +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-06 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.294317240E09 +++$+++ You know that we can't call it Season 4 seeing as there are NO given references, and 'Undubbed' is to wired so what should they be called  +++$+++ You know that we can't call it Season 4 seeing as there are NO given references, and 'Undubbed' is to wired so what should they be called [[User:K.O.K Kev|K.O.K Kev]] ([[User talk:K.O.K Kev|talk]]) 04:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
4265 +++$+++ K.O.K Kev +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4264 +++$+++ 4264 +++$+++ 2011-01-06 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.294317600E09 +++$+++ I Understand But, That Page Has to have a name change. This is not a forum, so we can't dub those episodes that season without reliable refereances, so what other title(s) do yo propose  +++$+++ : I Understand But, That Page Has to have a name change. This is not a forum, so we can't dub those episodes that season without reliable refereances, so what other title(s) do yo propose [[User:K.O.K Kev|K.O.K Kev]] ([[User talk:K.O.K Kev|talk]]) 04:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
4266 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4264 +++$+++ 4265 +++$+++ 2011-01-06 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.294317840E09 +++$+++ It does not \"have to\" have a name change now. Wait until more is known. Seriously - your personal opinions don't enter into it right now.  +++$+++ ::It does not "have to" have a name change now. Wait until more is known. Seriously - your personal opinions don't enter into it right now. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 04:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
4267 +++$+++ 72.197.237.120 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4264 +++$+++ 4266 +++$+++ 2011-02-03 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.296804360E09 +++$+++ Why do you keep adding episodes 93 through 149 back to the Road to Destiny page? If there really is a Season 4, your edits aren't showing that. Please be consistant with your edits, in order not to confuse people. By the way, If there will be no Season 4, then why don't you just delete the page already? Anyways, if there won't be a Season 4, please present your source, so that I may also agree with you. With thanks, [[Special:Contributions\/72.197.237.120|72.197.237.120]] ( +++$+++ :::Why do you keep adding episodes 93 through 149 back to the Road to Destiny page? If there really is a Season 4, your edits aren't showing that. Please be consistant with your edits, in order not to confuse people. By the way, If there will be no Season 4, then why don't you just delete the page already? Anyways, if there won't be a Season 4, please present your source, so that I may also agree with you. With thanks, [[Special:Contributions/72.197.237.120|72.197.237.120]] ([[User talk:72.197.237.120|talk]]) 23:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

266415 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266415 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-24 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.172385960E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, the '[[Devotional cult]]' article you recently created looks to me to be very similar in scope to [[Bhakti movement]] (whose title I have to admit I much prefer). What would you think of merging the two into a [[History of Bhakti]] or similar? Best Wishes,  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, the '[[Devotional cult]]' article you recently created looks to me to be very similar in scope to [[Bhakti movement]] (whose title I have to admit I much prefer). What would you think of merging the two into a [[History of Bhakti]] or similar? Best Wishes, [[User:GourangaUK|Gouranga(UK)]] 22:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
266416 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266415 +++$+++ 266415 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.172388300E09 +++$+++ I've got not plans on merging them, especially if you're in the process of building the cult article up. Would [[Devotional traditions]] be no good either? Is it just within Hinduism or will it be looking at the early years of Christian, Islamic and Jewish devotional as well? I'm just thinking of what would designate the article as within Hindusim specifically from the title? Will leave you alone now ;-) All the best,  +++$+++ :I've got not plans on merging them, especially if you're in the process of building the cult article up. Would [[Devotional traditions]] be no good either? Is it just within Hinduism or will it be looking at the early years of Christian, Islamic and Jewish devotional as well? I'm just thinking of what would designate the article as within Hindusim specifically from the title? Will leave you alone now ;-) All the best, [[User:GourangaUK|Gouranga(UK)]] 23:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
266417 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266415 +++$+++ 266416 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.172454240E09 +++$+++ Hello Mattisse - I'm a bit lost now - in the above quotations are you referring to 'Bhakti movements' as in Shaivism and Vaishnavism? I always assumed Bhakti was broadly used as a universal term meaning 'devotion' - who  appropriated it? [[Hindu devotional sects]] or [[Hindu devotional cults]] sound more specific - I was more worried initially incase you hadn't spotted the [[Bhakti movements]] article and might of duplicated some of the content (even if that article is in need of a clean-up). Good luck with the new article :-) Best Wishes,  +++$+++ ::Hello Mattisse - I'm a bit lost now - in the above quotations are you referring to 'Bhakti movements' as in Shaivism and Vaishnavism? I always assumed Bhakti was broadly used as a universal term meaning 'devotion' - who  appropriated it? [[Hindu devotional sects]] or [[Hindu devotional cults]] sound more specific - I was more worried initially incase you hadn't spotted the [[Bhakti movements]] article and might of duplicated some of the content (even if that article is in need of a clean-up). Good luck with the new article :-) Best Wishes, [[User:GourangaUK|Gouranga(UK)]] 17:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
266418 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266415 +++$+++ 266417 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.172458440E09 +++$+++ Bhakti meaning 'Bhakti only in the monotheistic sense', now I can see where this could cause upset if used in another way. [http:\/\/www.vedabase.net\/b\/bhakti Bhakti] as a word, is at least as old as the Bhagavad Gita, but I'm assuming it's usage will have been more popular in some areas than in others. Ys,  +++$+++ ::: Bhakti meaning 'Bhakti only in the monotheistic sense', now I can see where this could cause upset if used in another way. [http://www.vedabase.net/b/bhakti Bhakti] as a word, is at least as old as the Bhagavad Gita, but I'm assuming it's usage will have been more popular in some areas than in others. Ys, [[User:GourangaUK|Gouranga(UK)]] 18:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
266419 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266415 +++$+++ 266416 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.172387160E09 +++$+++ [[Yaksha]]. I have not read about this in Hoysala architecture anywhere. Its better not to use this. We dont want to add stuff that could later be questioned. Yaksha's and Yakshi's are more in Buddhist and Jain sculptures. Also, the statement \"so temple architecture is designed to move the devotee from outside to the ([[garbhagriha]]) through ambulatory passageways for [[circumambulation]]\" is probably not correct w.r.t Hoysala architecture. The circumabulation is generally around the shrine (in non-Hoysala temples) and on the Jagati going around the temple complex in Hoysala temples. +++$+++ ::[[Yaksha]]. I have not read about this in Hoysala architecture anywhere. Its better not to use this. We dont want to add stuff that could later be questioned. Yaksha's and Yakshi's are more in Buddhist and Jain sculptures. Also, the statement "so temple architecture is designed to move the devotee from outside to the ([[garbhagriha]]) through ambulatory passageways for [[circumambulation]]" is probably not correct w.r.t Hoysala architecture. The circumabulation is generally around the shrine (in non-Hoysala temples) and on the Jagati going around the temple complex in Hoysala temples.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

393928 +++$+++ Goran.S2 +++$+++ RyanCross +++$+++ 393928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-25 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.235548800E09 +++$+++ I saw you in peer review\/volunteers, so I don't know if you can help me to review at a tennis biography? It's '''[[Mario An\u010di\u0107]]'''. I just need some input from somebody, or, as I see, you're very busy. Do you know someone else then who can help?. Thanks! -- +++$+++ I saw you in peer review/volunteers, so I don't know if you can help me to review at a tennis biography? It's '''[[Mario Ančić]]'''. I just need some input from somebody, or, as I see, you're very busy. Do you know someone else then who can help?. Thanks! --[[User:Goran.S2|Göran S]] ([[User talk:Goran.S2|talk]]) 00:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
393929 +++$+++ RyanCross +++$+++ RyanCross +++$+++ 393928 +++$+++ 393928 +++$+++ 2009-02-25 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.235585340E09 +++$+++ My adoptee, {{user|Pax85}}, is quite a good copyeditor. Ask him, and I'm sure he may be able to take a look at your request. Thanks. &mdash;  +++$+++ :My adoptee, {{user|Pax85}}, is quite a good copyeditor. Ask him, and I'm sure he may be able to take a look at your request. Thanks. &mdash; [[User:RyanCross|<font color="#03C" face="cursive">'''Ryan'''Cross</font>]] ([[User talk:RyanCross|<font color="#03C" face="cursive">''talk''</font>]]) 10:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

528563 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528563 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-10 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.149978600E09 +++$+++ Hi! I left some comments about the [[Necedah Shrine]] on the discussion. Please let me know what you think. Thank you- +++$+++ Hi! I left some comments about the [[Necedah Shrine]] on the discussion. Please let me know what you think. Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] 15:30, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
528564 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528563 +++$+++ 528563 +++$+++ 2006-06-11 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.150068540E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your rewrite of the [[Necedah Shrine]] article.  +++$+++ : Many thanks for your rewrite of the [[Necedah Shrine]] article. [[User:RFD|RFD]] 16:29, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

266420 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-24 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.172389260E09 +++$+++ I changed Yaksha's to Kirthimukhas (roughly equivalent- meaning demon faces which is common in Hoysala temples). So you gave me an idea there. I retained the abmulatory passage ways statement as it is a general statement for Hindu temples. After a few lines we have explained that the Hoysala architecture does not provide that feature and hence the presence of ''jagati''. +++$+++ I changed Yaksha's to Kirthimukhas (roughly equivalent- meaning demon faces which is common in Hoysala temples). So you gave me an idea there. I retained the abmulatory passage ways statement as it is a general statement for Hindu temples. After a few lines we have explained that the Hoysala architecture does not provide that feature and hence the presence of ''jagati''.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
266421 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266420 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.172391840E09 +++$+++ I am gald you are enjoying it. yes religion has often been politicised and propagated to every possible media. +++$+++ ::I am gald you are enjoying it. yes religion has often been politicised and propagated to every possible media.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
266422 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266420 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.172457480E09 +++$+++ we got a big support for Hoysala architecture. You have made many many many contributions here.thanks +++$+++ ::we got a big support for Hoysala architecture. You have made many many many contributions here.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
266423 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266420 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.172458320E09 +++$+++ The support came from [[user:Nichalp]]. He did not give reasons, but he is well known for many FA himself. +++$+++ ::The support came from [[user:Nichalp]]. He did not give reasons, but he is well known for many FA himself.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
266424 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266420 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.172458680E09 +++$+++ [[Western Chalukya]] at full spead. I have been working on [[Rashtrakuta]] in the background. +++$+++ ::[[Western Chalukya]] at full spead. I have been working on [[Rashtrakuta]] in the background.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
266425 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266420 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.172458980E09 +++$+++ Though we dont have images from the four most important temples mentioned in the lead section of Western Chalukya, we have enough images to make the article look good and most importantly, the existing images are from well known Western Chalukya temples. I will visit these 4 temples (along with a dozen more) this summer and create pages for them also and follow it up with Western Chalukya architecture. +++$+++ ::Though we dont have images from the four most important temples mentioned in the lead section of Western Chalukya, we have enough images to make the article look good and most importantly, the existing images are from well known Western Chalukya temples. I will visit these 4 temples (along with a dozen more) this summer and create pages for them also and follow it up with Western Chalukya architecture.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
266426 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266420 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.172462160E09 +++$+++ Its not done untill it gets the FA status.Other reviewers may have other requirements. +++$+++ ::Its not done untill it gets the FA status.Other reviewers may have other requirements.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
266427 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266420 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.172462400E09 +++$+++ we should create stubs for ''Yali'', ''Makaratorana'', and ''Kirthimukha''. I have images for all three. This can happen in the background. +++$+++ ::we should create stubs for ''Yali'', ''Makaratorana'', and ''Kirthimukha''. I have images for all three. This can happen in the background.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

528566 +++$+++ Recury +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-16 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.150513260E09 +++$+++ Oops, sorry about that. I just saw him pop up in the main NASCAR category and skimmed the article and put him there, should have read more closely. I did create a [[:Category:NASCAR people]] category like an hour ago that he would fit nicely in.  +++$+++ Oops, sorry about that. I just saw him pop up in the main NASCAR category and skimmed the article and put him there, should have read more closely. I did create a [[:Category:NASCAR people]] category like an hour ago that he would fit nicely in. [[User:Recury|Recury]] 20:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
528567 +++$+++ Recury +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528566 +++$+++ 528566 +++$+++ 2006-06-16 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.150513620E09 +++$+++ Sure thing!  +++$+++ :Sure thing! [[User:Recury|Recury]] 20:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
528568 +++$+++ Recury +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528566 +++$+++ 528566 +++$+++ 2006-06-16 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.150514760E09 +++$+++ You know I was thinking, if you want more input on the standards I could spam the people listed in the project as participants with a message asking them to comment on it. I just figured out that AWB tool so it wouldn't be a big deal.  +++$+++ :You know I was thinking, if you want more input on the standards I could spam the people listed in the project as participants with a message asking them to comment on it. I just figured out that AWB tool so it wouldn't be a big deal. [[User:Recury|Recury]] 20:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
528569 +++$+++ Recury +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528566 +++$+++ 528568 +++$+++ 2006-06-16 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.150516320E09 +++$+++ I think consensus is just among Wikipedians in general, not admins or project members. After we are done with it, we just put in a category where people can comment on it and once no one has any major issues with it (and I don't think there's anything that's really, really controversial in it, probably just some minor stuff and clarifications) then it becomes a guideline or whatever.  +++$+++ ::I think consensus is just among Wikipedians in general, not admins or project members. After we are done with it, we just put in a category where people can comment on it and once no one has any major issues with it (and I don't think there's anything that's really, really controversial in it, probably just some minor stuff and clarifications) then it becomes a guideline or whatever. [[User:Recury|Recury]] 20:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

4279 +++$+++ Blue Square Thing +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4279 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-17 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.303090800E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to pop by and say thanks for helping out on these just now.  +++$+++ Just wanted to pop by and say thanks for helping out on these just now. [[User:Blue Square Thing|Blue Square Thing]] ([[User talk:Blue Square Thing|talk]]) 18:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
4280 +++$+++ Blue Square Thing +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4279 +++$+++ 4279 +++$+++ 2011-04-19 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.303280880E09 +++$+++ Don't drag me into it - Mike has every right to edit them as he sees fit. I'm looking to work on other articles just now. And do some real work.-- +++$+++ :Don't drag me into it - Mike has every right to edit them as he sees fit. I'm looking to work on other articles just now. And do some real work.--[[User:Blue Square Thing|Blue Square Thing]] ([[User talk:Blue Square Thing|talk]]) 23:28, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
4281 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4279 +++$+++ 4280 +++$+++ 2011-04-20 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.303295880E09 +++$+++ Darkcover21, until I see some basic understanding of spelling, grammar, and punctuation from you (and I've seen little from you thus far), I will continue to edit \"articals\" you contribute to as I see fit. Also, please read [[WP:OWN]], as you do not have the right to tell anyone not to edit any article.  +++$+++ ::Darkcover21, until I see some basic understanding of spelling, grammar, and punctuation from you (and I've seen little from you thus far), I will continue to edit "articals" you contribute to as I see fit. Also, please read [[WP:OWN]], as you do not have the right to tell anyone not to edit any article. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 03:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
4282 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4279 +++$+++ 4279 +++$+++ 2011-04-20 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.303368000E09 +++$+++ Good lord, man - LOOK at what you just posted! Your writing style is hideous...  +++$+++ :Good lord, man - LOOK at what you just posted! Your writing style is hideous... [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 23:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

481311 +++$+++ Storm05 +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481311 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-22 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.172176140E09 +++$+++ No free image of this person exists on the internet and the person in question has since been deasced and thus the counterexample is invalid. And as for the Micheal Addison it doesnt matter if the person is alive and all the images on the internet of him are from press or the police department and i dont think that ordanary people are allowed to take pictures of him during the trial and altering police or press photographs are not allowed.  +++$+++ No free image of this person exists on the internet and the person in question has since been deasced and thus the counterexample is invalid. And as for the Micheal Addison it doesnt matter if the person is alive and all the images on the internet of him are from press or the police department and i dont think that ordanary people are allowed to take pictures of him during the trial and altering police or press photographs are not allowed. [[User:Storm05|Storm05]] 12:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
481312 +++$+++ Storm05 +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481311 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.172185800E09 +++$+++ Uh im waiting for a response.  +++$+++ :::Uh im waiting for a response. [[User:Storm05|Storm05]] 15:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

4285 +++$+++ ISD +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-08 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.304909880E09 +++$+++ I've just noticed that same user is reverting the articles for [[Mongrels (TV series)]] and [[List of Mongrels episodes]] again. Annoyingly I edited the Mongrels (TV series) article before I spotted the vandalism.  +++$+++ I've just noticed that same user is reverting the articles for [[Mongrels (TV series)]] and [[List of Mongrels episodes]] again. Annoyingly I edited the Mongrels (TV series) article before I spotted the vandalism. [[User:ISD|ISD]] ([[User talk:ISD|talk]]) 19:58, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
4286 +++$+++ ISD +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4285 +++$+++ 4285 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.304952180E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for clearing the mess up.  +++$+++ :Thanks very much for clearing the mess up. [[User:ISD|ISD]] ([[User talk:ISD|talk]]) 07:43, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
4287 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4285 +++$+++ 4286 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.304979480E09 +++$+++ Not a problem...  +++$+++ ::Not a problem... [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 15:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

528574 +++$+++ Recury +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528574 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-27 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.151443260E09 +++$+++ Interesting article on board track racing (I had never heard of it!) but I need your input on something. I am working on categorization and am trying to figure out whether that article should go in [[:Category:Auto racing by type]] or if we should move it to [[Board track]] and put it into [[:Category:Auto racing terms]]. You know more about this subject than I do, so I would appreciate your opinion.  +++$+++ Interesting article on board track racing (I had never heard of it!) but I need your input on something. I am working on categorization and am trying to figure out whether that article should go in [[:Category:Auto racing by type]] or if we should move it to [[Board track]] and put it into [[:Category:Auto racing terms]]. You know more about this subject than I do, so I would appreciate your opinion. [[User:Recury|Recury]] 14:21, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
528575 +++$+++ Recury +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528574 +++$+++ 528574 +++$+++ 2006-06-28 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.151543520E09 +++$+++ OK, that way makes sense. As long as the articles we are writing for terms are expandable into full-fledged articles, then we don't have to worry about them being too dictionary-like. Like [[Drafting (racing)]] has a good article on it, but we probably couldn't make one that in-depth for like [[200-mile per hour tape]] or something. I'm not sure there are enough articles on NASCAR-specific terms at this point to make a [[:Category:NASCAR terms]] subcategory of [[:Category:Auto racing terms]], but there might be eventually. I just don't want to overcategorize.  +++$+++ :OK, that way makes sense. As long as the articles we are writing for terms are expandable into full-fledged articles, then we don't have to worry about them being too dictionary-like. Like [[Drafting (racing)]] has a good article on it, but we probably couldn't make one that in-depth for like [[200-mile per hour tape]] or something. I'm not sure there are enough articles on NASCAR-specific terms at this point to make a [[:Category:NASCAR terms]] subcategory of [[:Category:Auto racing terms]], but there might be eventually. I just don't want to overcategorize. [[User:Recury|Recury]] 18:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

266431 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-25 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.172464560E09 +++$+++ Also, Kirthimukha is not exactly a deity but more like a Gothic Gargoyle (hope I spelt it right). I have shown the Kirthimukha at the bottom of the \"Hoy.. arch..\" page. +++$+++ Also, Kirthimukha is not exactly a deity but more like a Gothic Gargoyle (hope I spelt it right). I have shown the Kirthimukha at the bottom of the "Hoy.. arch.." page.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:36, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
266432 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.172467980E09 +++$+++ I will look for it. +++$+++ ::I will look for it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
266433 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.172478300E09 +++$+++ It already existed at the bottom of the Hoy arch page. (the one before the last). In fact I may have a real close up also. +++$+++ ::It already existed at the bottom of the Hoy arch page. (the one before the last). In fact I may have a real close up also.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
266434 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.172478540E09 +++$+++ I have added the Yali image to the page. Take a look. Even the image in the [[Vijayanagara Empire]] page in the architecture section would do actually. +++$+++ ::I have added the Yali image to the page. Take a look. Even the image in the [[Vijayanagara Empire]] page in the architecture section would do actually.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
266435 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.172478660E09 +++$+++ In fact the kings who really popularised and used extensively the Kirthimukha were the [[Western Chalukyas]]. They will get a visit from me soon. +++$+++ ::In fact the kings who really popularised and used extensively the Kirthimukha were the [[Western Chalukyas]]. They will get a visit from me soon.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
266436 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.172479380E09 +++$+++ Take a look at the [[Western Chalukyas]] page under \"society\". I have added a Kirtimukha image. +++$+++ ::Take a look at the [[Western Chalukyas]] page under "society". I have added a Kirtimukha image.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
266437 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.172481120E09 +++$+++ I have many images showing the lions\/horses\/elephants etc but this one at the bottom of the hoy..arch.. page shows all the 6 mouldings we have described in the article and the wall images of the deities. The image you put in my talk page is good but does not show all these details. So for lack of space I did not use it. Also there seems to be some sculptural damage in the image you showed me. +++$+++ ::I have many images showing the lions/horses/elephants etc but this one at the bottom of the hoy..arch.. page shows all the 6 mouldings we have described in the article and the wall images of the deities. The image you put in my talk page is good but does not show all these details. So for lack of space I did not use it. Also there seems to be some sculptural damage in the image you showed me.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
266438 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.172483340E09 +++$+++ I have added your favourite image. How can it hurt to have one more?. If you feel it is not in the correct place, feel free to place it elsewhere. +++$+++ ::I have added your favourite image. How can it hurt to have one more?. If you feel it is not in the correct place, feel free to place it elsewhere.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
266439 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.172566260E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your intellectual curiocity. However, you may want to call it devotional sects because \"cult\" in todays atmosphere could be construed as something \"primitive\" or even worse. It does not bother me, I am just worried about the response you may get from others. +++$+++ ::I appreciate your intellectual curiocity. However, you may want to call it devotional sects because "cult" in todays atmosphere could be construed as something "primitive" or even worse. It does not bother me, I am just worried about the response you may get from others.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

4288 +++$+++ ISD +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-23 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.306205520E09 +++$+++ Hi again - it looks like the same user is editing out all the information about Destiny being self-centred again. Is there some way we can stop this user from making these edits?  +++$+++ Hi again - it looks like the same user is editing out all the information about Destiny being self-centred again. Is there some way we can stop this user from making these edits? [[User:ISD|ISD]] ([[User talk:ISD|talk]]) 19:52, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
4289 +++$+++ ISD +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4288 +++$+++ 4288 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.306254780E09 +++$+++ Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Thanks again. [[User:ISD|ISD]] ([[User talk:ISD|talk]]) 09:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

528577 +++$+++ Recury +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-03 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.151920140E09 +++$+++ Would you be OK with me moving [[Sprint car]] to [[Sprint car racing]]? Normally, I would just go ahead and do it because it's pretty much the same thing we were talking about before, but since you had it up on requested moves not even a month ago I just figured I would get your input. Also, I agree about merging [[Sprintcars]] into that since it's obviously the same topic; I'll probably go ahead and do it when I get a chance.  +++$+++ Would you be OK with me moving [[Sprint car]] to [[Sprint car racing]]? Normally, I would just go ahead and do it because it's pretty much the same thing we were talking about before, but since you had it up on requested moves not even a month ago I just figured I would get your input. Also, I agree about merging [[Sprintcars]] into that since it's obviously the same topic; I'll probably go ahead and do it when I get a chance. [[User:Recury|Recury]] 02:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
528578 +++$+++ Recury +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528577 +++$+++ 528577 +++$+++ 2006-07-03 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.151960760E09 +++$+++ That was just me and a friend of mine messing around by vandalizing each other's pages. It's was just easier to wait out the block then explain the whole thing.  +++$+++ :That was just me and a friend of mine messing around by vandalizing each other's pages. It's was just easier to wait out the block then explain the whole thing. [[User:Recury|Recury]] 14:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

262859 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262859 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-18 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.203386640E09 +++$+++ Hi Colin.  I you're not doing much (tongue planted firmly in cheek), so I was wondering if you could take a look at the article.  It's really come along.   +++$+++ Hi Colin.  I you're not doing much (tongue planted firmly in cheek), so I was wondering if you could take a look at the article.  It's really come along.  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 18:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
262860 +++$+++ LeadSongDog +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262859 +++$+++ 262859 +++$+++ 2008-06-03 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.212543420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the fixes.  I got interrupted and had to leave it unchecked...  +++$+++ :Thanks for the fixes.  I got interrupted and had to leave it unchecked... [[User:LeadSongDog|LeadSongDog]] ([[User talk:LeadSongDog|talk]]) 18:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

4293 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-28 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.306650600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for cleaning up all of that spam. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ Thanks for cleaning up all of that spam. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 23:30, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
4294 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4293 +++$+++ 4293 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.306676160E09 +++$+++ It was a way to pass the time... :)   +++$+++ :It was a way to pass the time... :)  [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 06:36, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

4295 +++$+++ Salvio giuliano +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-29 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.306734780E09 +++$+++ <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml\">  ''' +++$+++ <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">  '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> [[User talk:Salvio giuliano| <sup>Let's talk about it!</sup>]] 22:53, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
4296 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4295 +++$+++ 4295 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.306735020E09 +++$+++ Thanks - so what did 81.151.238.212 post that was so bad to get it perma-removed?  +++$+++ :Thanks - so what did 81.151.238.212 post that was so bad to get it perma-removed? [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 22:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
4297 +++$+++ Salvio giuliano +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4295 +++$+++ 4296 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.306735380E09 +++$+++ Nothing particularly witty, really; it was just a brief rant regarding your... Shall we say smartness? <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml\">  ''' +++$+++ ::Nothing particularly witty, really; it was just a brief rant regarding your... Shall we say smartness? <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">  '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> [[User talk:Salvio giuliano| <sup>Let's talk about it!</sup>]] 23:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
4298 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4295 +++$+++ 4297 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.306736400E09 +++$+++ Doesn't surprise me - this guy's been IP hopping and\/or insulting me when he gets caught for months now...  +++$+++ :::Doesn't surprise me - this guy's been IP hopping and/or insulting me when he gets caught for months now... [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 23:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
4299 +++$+++ Protonk +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4295 +++$+++ 4295 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.306736820E09 +++$+++ Remember, now that you have rollback you'll see links to it when you visit a contributions, history or watchlist page.  If you have a touchsceen device you may accidentally fat finger it and revert some random good edits!  Just go back and revert yourself and everything will be cool.  Good luck using the tool.  +++$+++ *Remember, now that you have rollback you'll see links to it when you visit a contributions, history or watchlist page.  If you have a touchsceen device you may accidentally fat finger it and revert some random good edits!  Just go back and revert yourself and everything will be cool.  Good luck using the tool. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 23:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

266440 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-27 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.172566980E09 +++$+++ He has given conditional support and is not satisfied by the header called \"addendum\". Perhaps we should call both the subsections as \"Research\" since modern research  has thrown light on the architectural styles inherited from previous kingdoms, Hoysala artists who worked on the temples etc. He has not indicated what it should be called though. +++$+++ He has given conditional support and is not satisfied by the header called "addendum". Perhaps we should call both the subsections as "Research" since modern research  has thrown light on the architectural styles inherited from previous kingdoms, Hoysala artists who worked on the temples etc. He has not indicated what it should be called though.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
266441 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.172618580E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I want to nominate [[Amoghavarsha]] for DYK (did you know). Please find time to do a copy edit on this article (not necessarily today). It is a new topic and has been edited significantly by me in the last 5 days (important requirements for DYK). +++$+++ ::Mattisse, I want to nominate [[Amoghavarsha]] for DYK (did you know). Please find time to do a copy edit on this article (not necessarily today). It is a new topic and has been edited significantly by me in the last 5 days (important requirements for DYK).[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
266442 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.172639340E09 +++$+++ The fact he abdicated the throne.I will provide citation. +++$+++ ::The fact he abdicated the throne.I will provide citation.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
266443 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.172640120E09 +++$+++ I see a lot of moving around of blocks in Hoy.. arc... was this just movement of blocks to correct locations? +++$+++ ::I see a lot of moving around of blocks in Hoy.. arc... was this just movement of blocks to correct locations?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
266444 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.172640900E09 +++$+++ I will go thru it once more tonight just to make sure. This time like a reviewer. +++$+++ ::I will go thru it once more tonight just to make sure. This time like a reviewer.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
266445 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.172644680E09 +++$+++ I will look into that. I will work on the Mantapa section first tonight. +++$+++ ::I will look into that. I will work on the Mantapa section first tonight.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
266446 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.172647920E09 +++$+++ Go ahead and put the image you mentioned where you think it should be. I have cleaned up the different sections. Take a look. The temple complex section unfortunately does not mention Vimana or pillars anywhere, may be a onle line mention should be made. But this may be ok. Also something needs to be done to the images at the very bottom. They seem to be scattered everywhere, or is just my browser resolution? +++$+++ ::Go ahead and put the image you mentioned where you think it should be. I have cleaned up the different sections. Take a look. The temple complex section unfortunately does not mention Vimana or pillars anywhere, may be a onle line mention should be made. But this may be ok. Also something needs to be done to the images at the very bottom. They seem to be scattered everywhere, or is just my browser resolution?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
266447 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.172650140E09 +++$+++ why are the two bottom images in \"centre\" location?does it help variety of browswr resolutions? +++$+++ ::why are the two bottom images in "centre" location?does it help variety of browswr resolutions?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
266448 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.172656380E09 +++$+++ good you moved the image up. The emblem was not meant to be there. I will replace the emblem with an image of a temple without jagati showing the elephant balustrades. (the very temple I have described above) +++$+++ ::good you moved the image up. The emblem was not meant to be there. I will replace the emblem with an image of a temple without jagati showing the elephant balustrades. (the very temple I have described above)[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
266449 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.172656500E09 +++$+++ actually, we are not supposed to change image size in FA as it may appear distorted on different screens. +++$+++ ::actually, we are not supposed to change image size in FA as it may appear distorted on different screens.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
266450 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.172656800E09 +++$+++ The size should not be specified. meaning natural size. The image you moved to the top essentially shows the Vimana (minus the partially visible jagati) +++$+++ ::The size should not be specified. meaning natural size. The image you moved to the top essentially shows the Vimana (minus the partially visible jagati)[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
266451 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.172658060E09 +++$+++ when this article becomes FA, could you please remove the paragraphs of text that currently reside in the article in \"commented out\" state. Just making sure that someone does not come along in the futuer and unknowingly or knowingly removes the comments.Vandalism comes in different shapes and forms, right? +++$+++ ::when this article becomes FA, could you please remove the paragraphs of text that currently reside in the article in "commented out" state. Just making sure that someone does not come along in the futuer and unknowingly or knowingly removes the comments.Vandalism comes in different shapes and forms, right?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
266452 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.172660040E09 +++$+++ I will keep that in mind. I did not realise I had put my last message on my own talk page. +++$+++ ::I will keep that in mind. I did not realise I had put my last message on my own talk page.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
266453 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266440 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.172709960E09 +++$+++ Yes, there is Amgohavarsha II and III from the same dynasty. +++$+++ ::Yes, there is Amgohavarsha II and III from the same dynasty.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 16:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

528585 +++$+++ Freekee +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-05 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.152094860E09 +++$+++ Did you see they deleted that article, along with [[List of Wisconsin musicians]]? And also the similar lists for every other state? I believe this was done improperly - without tagging the pages. Do you recall seeing a tag go up, mentioning an AfD? - +++$+++ Did you see they deleted that article, along with [[List of Wisconsin musicians]]? And also the similar lists for every other state? I believe this was done improperly - without tagging the pages. Do you recall seeing a tag go up, mentioning an AfD? -[[User:Freekee|Freekee]] 03:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
528586 +++$+++ Freekee +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528585 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.152100020E09 +++$+++ Glad you're still enjoying The Gufs. They were at Summerfest last week, but I wasn't able to go. - +++$+++ ::Glad you're still enjoying The Gufs. They were at Summerfest last week, but I wasn't able to go. -[[User:Freekee|Freekee]] 04:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
528587 +++$+++ Sango123 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528585 +++$+++ 528585 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.152137460E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, and thanks for the notification. After closing this [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of United States musicians|AfD discussion]], the only article I deleted was [[List of United States musicians]], while [[User:Kimchi.sg|another admin]] deleted [[List of bands from Wisconsin]] and other such articles. I apologize for any confusion this may have caused. If needed, I can restore the list(s) into your userspace until the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#List of United States musicians|deletion review]] is settled. Thanks, <span style=\"font-size:99%\">''' +++$+++ *Hi Royalbroil, and thanks for the notification. After closing this [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States musicians|AfD discussion]], the only article I deleted was [[List of United States musicians]], while [[User:Kimchi.sg|another admin]] deleted [[List of bands from Wisconsin]] and other such articles. I apologize for any confusion this may have caused. If needed, I can restore the list(s) into your userspace until the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#List of United States musicians|deletion review]] is settled. Thanks, <span style="font-size:99%">'''[[User:Sango123|<font color="darkblue">Sango</font>]][[User talk:Sango123|<font color="gray"><span style="cursor:help">123</span></font>]]'''</span> 15:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

4301 +++$+++ Jake Fuersturm +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-31 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.306898160E09 +++$+++ Are you aware that this is the first time it's aired in Canada? It's most certainly not, as you say, a \"secondary\" airing as far as Canada is concerned. --  +++$+++ Are you aware that this is the first time it's aired in Canada? It's most certainly not, as you say, a "secondary" airing as far as Canada is concerned. -- [[User:Jake Fuersturm|Jake Fuersturm]] ([[User talk:Jake Fuersturm|talk]]) 20:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
4302 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4301 +++$+++ 4301 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.306898640E09 +++$+++ So? Are you going to start adding in every single airing in every single country? How is this even remotely notable or have any impact on the actual production itself? It's a minor inconsequential detail.  +++$+++ :So? Are you going to start adding in every single airing in every single country? How is this even remotely notable or have any impact on the actual production itself? It's a minor inconsequential detail. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 20:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
4303 +++$+++ Jake Fuersturm +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4301 +++$+++ 4302 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.306899600E09 +++$+++ Not the first TV article to bring up the subject of airings.  It's ''notable to Canadians''. Or are you saying that Canada is inconsequential? --  +++$+++ ::Not the first TV article to bring up the subject of airings.  It's ''notable to Canadians''. Or are you saying that Canada is inconsequential? -- [[User:Jake Fuersturm|Jake Fuersturm]] ([[User talk:Jake Fuersturm|talk]]) 20:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
4304 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4301 +++$+++ 4303 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.306899780E09 +++$+++ Don't try to put words into my mouth - the subject of the article is about a TV series. That's it. A rebroadcast, even in another country, is not inherently notable, unless there was something newsworthy about it, like incredible ratings or some newsworthy controversy\/public interest. All you're adding is that it aired. Big whoop - it has no significant bearing on the program itself, and unless you can find some valid justification for it's notability, it doesn't belong.  +++$+++ :::Don't try to put words into my mouth - the subject of the article is about a TV series. That's it. A rebroadcast, even in another country, is not inherently notable, unless there was something newsworthy about it, like incredible ratings or some newsworthy controversy/public interest. All you're adding is that it aired. Big whoop - it has no significant bearing on the program itself, and unless you can find some valid justification for it's notability, it doesn't belong. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 20:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
4305 +++$+++ Jake Fuersturm +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4301 +++$+++ 4304 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.306900200E09 +++$+++ And as I said before, it's not a \"rebroadcast.  It would only be a rebroadcast if Canada is considered part of the U.S., which it's not. --  +++$+++ ::::And as I said before, it's not a "rebroadcast.  It would only be a rebroadcast if Canada is considered part of the U.S., which it's not. -- [[User:Jake Fuersturm|Jake Fuersturm]] ([[User talk:Jake Fuersturm|talk]]) 20:50, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
4306 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4301 +++$+++ 4305 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.306900620E09 +++$+++ It's a rebroadcast, in that the original airings, around which all the press and awards are related, was a year ago. These new airings are not inherently notable - they just exist. They're essentially syndication. Unless there is some special notability granted just for some network, Canadian or otherwise, deciding to air the thing, that mention doesn't belong.  +++$+++ :::::It's a rebroadcast, in that the original airings, around which all the press and awards are related, was a year ago. These new airings are not inherently notable - they just exist. They're essentially syndication. Unless there is some special notability granted just for some network, Canadian or otherwise, deciding to air the thing, that mention doesn't belong. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 20:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
4307 +++$+++ Jake Fuersturm +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4301 +++$+++ 4306 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.306900740E09 +++$+++ And for the record, would you take this position for Canadian shows that subsequently aired in the U.S. a year later? --  +++$+++ ::::::And for the record, would you take this position for Canadian shows that subsequently aired in the U.S. a year later? -- [[User:Jake Fuersturm|Jake Fuersturm]] ([[User talk:Jake Fuersturm|talk]]) 20:59, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
4308 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4301 +++$+++ 4307 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.306900980E09 +++$+++ It would depend on the circumstances. This is not a black\/white, right\/wrong, Jake vs. Wikipedia thing here - I treat things on a case by case basis, looking at notability, press coverage\/citations. I will not give you a definite answer on this question, because it cannot be answered definitely without looking at the specifics of a given situation.  +++$+++ :::::::It would depend on the circumstances. This is not a black/white, right/wrong, Jake vs. Wikipedia thing here - I treat things on a case by case basis, looking at notability, press coverage/citations. I will not give you a definite answer on this question, because it cannot be answered definitely without looking at the specifics of a given situation. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 21:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
4309 +++$+++ Jake Fuersturm +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4301 +++$+++ 4308 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.306901100E09 +++$+++ Spoken like a true politician.  Thanks, that tells me everything I need to know.  Cheers. --  +++$+++ ::::::::Spoken like a true politician.  Thanks, that tells me everything I need to know.  Cheers. -- [[User:Jake Fuersturm|Jake Fuersturm]] ([[User talk:Jake Fuersturm|talk]]) 21:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
4310 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4301 +++$+++ 4309 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.306901460E09 +++$+++ Ah, the passive\/agressive snark\/insult... nice to see that you're consistent, anyway...  +++$+++ :::::::::Ah, the passive/agressive snark/insult... nice to see that you're consistent, anyway... [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 21:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
4311 +++$+++ Protonk +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4301 +++$+++ 4309 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.306901520E09 +++$+++ {{ec}} No need to be snarky.  +++$+++ :::::::::{{ec}} No need to be snarky. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 21:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

612387 +++$+++ Aeon1006 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-07 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.157683560E09 +++$+++ That case was closed a while ago due to inactivity.  <font color=\"SteelBlue\">[[User:Aeon1006|\xc6on]]<\/font> <font color=\"red\"><sup>[[User talk:Aeon1006|Insanity Now!]]<\/sup><\/font><sub><font color=\"Green\"> +++$+++ That case was closed a while ago due to inactivity.  <font color="SteelBlue">[[User:Aeon1006|Æon]]</font> <font color="red"><sup>[[User talk:Aeon1006|Insanity Now!]]</sup></font><sub><font color="Green">[[User:Aeon1006/Esperanza|EA!]]</font></sub> 19:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
612388 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612387 +++$+++ 612387 +++$+++ 2006-09-07 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.157683920E09 +++$+++ Ta. .. +++$+++ :Ta. ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

528596 +++$+++ Circeus +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-28 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.154146740E09 +++$+++ Do you think you could separate your [[WP:EL|external links]] from your [[WP:CITE|references]] in [[Steve Millen]]?  +++$+++ Do you think you could separate your [[WP:EL|external links]] from your [[WP:CITE|references]] in [[Steve Millen]]? [[User:Circeus|Circeus]] 21:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
528597 +++$+++ Circeus +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528596 +++$+++ 528596 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.154148120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Circeus|Circeus]] 21:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

266455 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266455 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-28 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.172710680E09 +++$+++ It was not uncommon for queens to accompany the King on expeditions. +++$+++ It was not uncommon for queens to accompany the King on expeditions.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 16:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
266456 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266455 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.172710980E09 +++$+++ I have left a message for [[user:KNM]] about the name thing. This article has been accepted for DYK, so we dont want to do something in haste that can hold it up. May be inside the article we can say \"Amoghavarsha, also known as Amoghavarsha I...\" +++$+++ ::I have left a message for [[user:KNM]] about the name thing. This article has been accepted for DYK, so we dont want to do something in haste that can hold it up. May be inside the article we can say "Amoghavarsha, also known as Amoghavarsha I..."[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
266457 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266455 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.172711160E09 +++$+++ He was not crowned as Amoghavarsha I, this is a modern designation I believe. I will look more carefully into the article later tonight. +++$+++ ::He was not crowned as Amoghavarsha I, this is a modern designation I believe. I will look more carefully into the article later tonight.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
266458 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266455 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.172731800E09 +++$+++ Ok. Amoghavarsha I is fine. +++$+++ :: Ok. Amoghavarsha I is fine.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
266459 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266455 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.172738160E09 +++$+++ Its two words (Sthamba means pillar, Buttalika probably maiden) +++$+++ ::Its two words (Sthamba means pillar, Buttalika probably maiden)[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:36, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
266460 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266455 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.172739000E09 +++$+++ [[Amoghavarsha]]-->please take one last look when you have time. I added some citations and words.I am glad you did not take the vandalism by the anon to heart. +++$+++ ::[[Amoghavarsha]]-->please take one last look when you have time. I added some citations and words.I am glad you did not take the vandalism by the anon to heart.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
266461 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266455 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.172741100E09 +++$+++ Please Check your email. +++$+++ ::Please Check your email.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
266462 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266455 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.172745840E09 +++$+++ what I meant is, generally clarifications of a religious nature are contentious. So I was trying to avoid edit wars with contentious editors later on. I have faith in your edits. +++$+++ ::what I meant is, generally clarifications of a religious nature are contentious. So I was trying to avoid edit wars with contentious editors later on. I have faith in your edits.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
266463 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266455 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.172747340E09 +++$+++ good thing about architecture articles is it is less likely to be vandalised. Vandals vandalise what they understand and this topic may go right over their heads. +++$+++ :: good thing about architecture articles is it is less likely to be vandalised. Vandals vandalise what they understand and this topic may go right over their heads.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

4313 +++$+++ Ereep +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4313 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-01 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.306970820E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry if I was removing your deletion code. I panicked because I was writing the article for work. If there's anything I can do to make it up, please say. About the article itself, I understand your concern, and I want to see if we can make it work to restore the article to Wikipedia. I feel that the version that only included the history of the product and excluded any of the in-depth technical information from the website is valid. The reason I say this is because a product that does exactly the same thing as ReduceMail Pro, [[Symantec_Enterprise_Vault|Enterprise Vault]], is on Wikipedia. We got off on the wrong foot, and it was my fault. If there's anything we can do to make this work, please say.  +++$+++ I'm sorry if I was removing your deletion code. I panicked because I was writing the article for work. If there's anything I can do to make it up, please say. About the article itself, I understand your concern, and I want to see if we can make it work to restore the article to Wikipedia. I feel that the version that only included the history of the product and excluded any of the in-depth technical information from the website is valid. The reason I say this is because a product that does exactly the same thing as ReduceMail Pro, [[Symantec_Enterprise_Vault|Enterprise Vault]], is on Wikipedia. We got off on the wrong foot, and it was my fault. If there's anything we can do to make this work, please say. [[User:Ereep|Ereep]] ([[User talk:Ereep|talk]]) 16:27, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
4314 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4313 +++$+++ 4313 +++$+++ 2011-06-01 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.306971420E09 +++$+++ One thing you need to understand is that if you are being paid to write an article, or are connected to the company that developed the software, you have a clear [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] and have no business creating or substantially editing such an article. If this software is notable, let someone unconnected write about it independently. Also, in regards to Enterprise Vault, you'd be wise to look at [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]] - it's a poor argument for inclusion.  +++$+++ :One thing you need to understand is that if you are being paid to write an article, or are connected to the company that developed the software, you have a clear [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] and have no business creating or substantially editing such an article. If this software is notable, let someone unconnected write about it independently. Also, in regards to Enterprise Vault, you'd be wise to look at [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]] - it's a poor argument for inclusion. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 16:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
4315 +++$+++ Ereep +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4313 +++$+++ 4314 +++$+++ 2011-06-01 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.306995660E09 +++$+++ I disagree with the assertion that I definitely have a conflict of interest. My goal is ultimately for the article to remain itself on Wikipedia, so in order to do that, I will attempt to be as neutral as possible. Granted, I won't go out of the way to include a \"criticisms\" section, but if it did appear, I wouldn't excise it. If it seems that what I am saying appears biased, then others should criticize the article on that basis, including one of those bias tags, and we should see if we can make it better. I feel that on-the-market software of any sort is notable. To only include the history and describe what the software does is in no way problematic. The language simply needs to remain without value judgments. To prove that I am of good faith, what if I write a Wikipedia article about another piece of software of which I have no relation? Perhaps even a similar competing software to ReduceMail Pro? I truly feel that any type of on-the-market software deserves Wikipedia mention. I am writing the artice for work, but only in so much as I am supposed to be serving the general public knowledge. I'll do anything reasonable I need to do to get this properly back on Wikipedia in a way that only is of benefit. Just say the word and tell me what to do, Mr. Wazowski.  +++$+++ ::I disagree with the assertion that I definitely have a conflict of interest. My goal is ultimately for the article to remain itself on Wikipedia, so in order to do that, I will attempt to be as neutral as possible. Granted, I won't go out of the way to include a "criticisms" section, but if it did appear, I wouldn't excise it. If it seems that what I am saying appears biased, then others should criticize the article on that basis, including one of those bias tags, and we should see if we can make it better. I feel that on-the-market software of any sort is notable. To only include the history and describe what the software does is in no way problematic. The language simply needs to remain without value judgments. To prove that I am of good faith, what if I write a Wikipedia article about another piece of software of which I have no relation? Perhaps even a similar competing software to ReduceMail Pro? I truly feel that any type of on-the-market software deserves Wikipedia mention. I am writing the artice for work, but only in so much as I am supposed to be serving the general public knowledge. I'll do anything reasonable I need to do to get this properly back on Wikipedia in a way that only is of benefit. Just say the word and tell me what to do, Mr. Wazowski. [[User:Ereep|Ereep]] ([[User talk:Ereep|talk]]) 23:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
4316 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4313 +++$+++ 4315 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.306998000E09 +++$+++ You keep saying you're doing this article for work - are you employed by or for the company that makes this software? Because if you are, then you do have a clear conflict of interest, as far as Wikipedia is concerned - I'd advise you t take a look at the [[WP:COI|specific guidelines]] and familiarize yourself with them before continuing.  +++$+++ :::You keep saying you're doing this article for work - are you employed by or for the company that makes this software? Because if you are, then you do have a clear conflict of interest, as far as Wikipedia is concerned - I'd advise you t take a look at the [[WP:COI|specific guidelines]] and familiarize yourself with them before continuing. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 00:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

523886 +++$+++ Alientraveller +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 523886 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-08 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.181350740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for all the notes. Please note urls are not always necessary for an old news article, nor does my source ([[Joseph McBride]]'s Spielberg bio) does not always go into full detail.  +++$+++ Thanks for all the notes. Please note urls are not always necessary for an old news article, nor does my source ([[Joseph McBride]]'s Spielberg bio) does not always go into full detail. [[User:Alientraveller|Alientraveller]] 17:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
523887 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 523886 +++$+++ 523886 +++$+++ 2007-06-08 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.181354220E09 +++$+++ Did you catch the \"work with me\" part? You seem to be arguing, rather than genuinely trying to address my concerns. For example \"if he is cited, he is reliable\" - huh? I can cite my uncle Al,<ref name=uncleAl>Alphonse J. \"The Cheezinator\" Mouse. Personal statement, [[June 8]], [[2007]]. Retrieved June 8, 2007.<\/ref> does that make him a [[Wikipedia:reliable source]]? Enough of one for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article]], which are supposed to be the best we can offer? In this case Chris Hewitt seems to be a reviewer for EmpireOnline.com - what the heck is that? -- +++$+++ : Did you catch the "work with me" part? You seem to be arguing, rather than genuinely trying to address my concerns. For example "if he is cited, he is reliable" - huh? I can cite my uncle Al,<ref name=uncleAl>Alphonse J. "The Cheezinator" Mouse. Personal statement, [[June 8]], [[2007]]. Retrieved June 8, 2007.</ref> does that make him a [[Wikipedia:reliable source]]? Enough of one for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article]], which are supposed to be the best we can offer? In this case Chris Hewitt seems to be a reviewer for EmpireOnline.com - what the heck is that? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

4318 +++$+++ Erikeltic +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-02 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.307078160E09 +++$+++ Once again you are being accused of being a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJake_Fuersturm&action=historysubmit&diff=432250590&oldid=432250057 proxy] of mine.  I guess we've come a long way since you reported me for the 3RR I was guilty of a couple of years a back.  I only mention that 3RR because it demonstrates that A) we are not in \"cahoots\", B) we have grown as editors, and C) despite any past issues we can work together at this point.  I have come to respect and value your opinion as an editor, but I would recommend just ignoring drama and drop the stick.  It's not worth it.  Nothing good will come from continued discussion over ''nonsense''.  That's my peace and those will be my only comments on the matter.  Thanks.   +++$+++ Once again you are being accused of being a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJake_Fuersturm&action=historysubmit&diff=432250590&oldid=432250057 proxy] of mine.  I guess we've come a long way since you reported me for the 3RR I was guilty of a couple of years a back.  I only mention that 3RR because it demonstrates that A) we are not in "cahoots", B) we have grown as editors, and C) despite any past issues we can work together at this point.  I have come to respect and value your opinion as an editor, but I would recommend just ignoring drama and drop the stick.  It's not worth it.  Nothing good will come from continued discussion over ''nonsense''.  That's my peace and those will be my only comments on the matter.  Thanks.  [[User:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#337533"><B>Erikeltic</B>]]</span> <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#337533">Talk]]</span>)</span></sup> 22:16, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
4319 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4318 +++$+++ 4318 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.307084400E09 +++$+++ Whatever - the guy obviously can't accept that he's at fault in any of the disagreements he's had. I doubt this block will change things.  +++$+++ :Whatever - the guy obviously can't accept that he's at fault in any of the disagreements he's had. I doubt this block will change things. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 00:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

612389 +++$+++ MAG1 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-07 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.157693460E09 +++$+++ Hi,  I have revised the British Isles history, which I think you have had a large hand in.  It's not because I thought the original version was terrible, but I have tried to focus in on some things, as described on the talk page (which is currently blissfully quiet).  Any road, I'd be very interested in any comments you might have, and obviously steam in and make whatever improvements you think necessary. I hope I have not made a sow's ear out of a silk purse  +++$+++ Hi,  I have revised the British Isles history, which I think you have had a large hand in.  It's not because I thought the original version was terrible, but I have tried to focus in on some things, as described on the talk page (which is currently blissfully quiet).  Any road, I'd be very interested in any comments you might have, and obviously steam in and make whatever improvements you think necessary. I hope I have not made a sow's ear out of a silk purse [[User:MAG1|MAG1]] 22:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
612390 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612389 +++$+++ 612389 +++$+++ 2006-09-07 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.157697840E09 +++$+++ Not quite so quiet now! At first glance there's a lot I like, though some omissions which I'll try to fix such as HenryVIII's role in Ireland and the reformations in England and Scotland. My intention was as brief as possible an overview of multt-national devlopments: there's a case for expanding sections into separate main articles with just a summary at BI. Your news about Microcosmus is very interesting: I've gone over development of terms at [[British Isles (terminology)]] and that's an area that needs expanding. Am a bit busy just now, but will try to get back onto the BI, and revise the history of the terminology there too: at present it sets out to show how British means UK so BI is wrong, the history section should be a neutral statement. By the way, the association of Brit with the main island seems to have started with the Romans using the term for their province: an early case of a term being used to claim territory not actually under their control! So it continues...  +++$+++ :Not quite so quiet now! At first glance there's a lot I like, though some omissions which I'll try to fix such as HenryVIII's role in Ireland and the reformations in England and Scotland. My intention was as brief as possible an overview of multt-national devlopments: there's a case for expanding sections into separate main articles with just a summary at BI. Your news about Microcosmus is very interesting: I've gone over development of terms at [[British Isles (terminology)]] and that's an area that needs expanding. Am a bit busy just now, but will try to get back onto the BI, and revise the history of the terminology there too: at present it sets out to show how British means UK so BI is wrong, the history section should be a neutral statement. By the way, the association of Brit with the main island seems to have started with the Romans using the term for their province: an early case of a term being used to claim territory not actually under their control! So it continues... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 23:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

4320 +++$+++ Gerardw +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-03 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.307155800E09 +++$+++ I'd appreciate it if you could stay off Jake's talk page for the duration of his block. It's not helpful. I'm not asserting you've done anything wrong with your edits, that your a puppet of E, or anything like that. He just needs time to cool down. Thanks.  +++$+++ I'd appreciate it if you could stay off Jake's talk page for the duration of his block. It's not helpful. I'm not asserting you've done anything wrong with your edits, that your a puppet of E, or anything like that. He just needs time to cool down. Thanks. [[User:Gerardw|Gerardw]] ([[User talk:Gerardw|talk]]) 19:50, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
4321 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4320 +++$+++ 4320 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.307156160E09 +++$+++ I gave him one last chance today to discuss this like an adult - however, his little [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Jake_Fuersturm&diff=prev&oldid=432405130 \"warning\"] just shows me that he still doesn't see that he bears any responsibility for his actions. His loss. I've got better things to do than worry about him from here on - however, he '''really''' needs to lay off the wild accusations, or I will bring him up at the Wikiquette boards and let them deal with it, should he continue.  +++$+++ :I gave him one last chance today to discuss this like an adult - however, his little [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jake_Fuersturm&diff=prev&oldid=432405130 "warning"] just shows me that he still doesn't see that he bears any responsibility for his actions. His loss. I've got better things to do than worry about him from here on - however, he '''really''' needs to lay off the wild accusations, or I will bring him up at the Wikiquette boards and let them deal with it, should he continue. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 19:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
4322 +++$+++ Gerardw +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4320 +++$+++ 4321 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.307156580E09 +++$+++ I don't disagree he needs to refocus his concerns. It's just human nature to lash out if you feel cornered, and I don't think it really hurts anything to let him vent a little bit on his talk page.  +++$+++ ::I don't disagree he needs to refocus his concerns. It's just human nature to lash out if you feel cornered, and I don't think it really hurts anything to let him vent a little bit on his talk page. [[User:Gerardw|Gerardw]] ([[User talk:Gerardw|talk]]) 20:03, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
4323 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4320 +++$+++ 4322 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.307399880E09 +++$+++ It's almost funny watching him rant about how unfair this has all been. Almost. And since I know he's reading and looking for something to add to his list of injustices - regarding his [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Jake_Fuersturm&curid=18907378&diff=432863075&oldid=432453080 potential SPI witch hunt]? Bring it on, kid - I can't wait to see your next conspiracy theory after that idea gets shot down.  +++$+++ :::It's almost funny watching him rant about how unfair this has all been. Almost. And since I know he's reading and looking for something to add to his list of injustices - regarding his [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jake_Fuersturm&curid=18907378&diff=432863075&oldid=432453080 potential SPI witch hunt]? Bring it on, kid - I can't wait to see your next conspiracy theory after that idea gets shot down. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 15:38, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
4324 +++$+++ Erikeltic +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4320 +++$+++ 4323 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 11:34:00 +++$+++ 1.307471640E09 +++$+++ Fyi... [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Jake_Fuersturm&curid=18907378&diff=432980713&oldid=432863603] So unless ''Wombat Fuerstrum'' creates yet another sock and\/or lives up to his threat of harassing me via anonymous IP, he's going to have some time to think about what he's done.   +++$+++ ::::Fyi... [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jake_Fuersturm&curid=18907378&diff=432980713&oldid=432863603] So unless ''Wombat Fuerstrum'' creates yet another sock and/or lives up to his threat of harassing me via anonymous IP, he's going to have some time to think about what he's done.  [[User:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#337533"><B>Erikeltic</B>]]</span> <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#337533">Talk]]</span>)</span></sup> 11:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

266468 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-03 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.172985720E09 +++$+++ It is featured now. Again, thanks for your many many unique contributions. +++$+++ It is featured now. Again, thanks for your many many unique contributions.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
266469 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266468 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.172986260E09 +++$+++ Its been a pleasure to work with you also. I have been at the office the entire day and was just wrapping up when I switched to wiki and saw. This success should give us confidence that other architecture articles can happen. Western Chalukya and Vijayanagara architecture to follow this year. +++$+++ :: Its been a pleasure to work with you also. I have been at the office the entire day and was just wrapping up when I switched to wiki and saw. This success should give us confidence that other architecture articles can happen. Western Chalukya and Vijayanagara architecture to follow this year.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
266470 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266468 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.172987460E09 +++$+++ I have emailed you. Also western chalukyas next. +++$+++ ::I have emailed you. Also western chalukyas next.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

4325 +++$+++ Erikeltic +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4325 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-09 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.307643600E09 +++$+++ Jake's created yet another sock and filed an SPI against us.  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/Erikeltic]   +++$+++ Jake's created yet another sock and filed an SPI against us.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Erikeltic]  [[User:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#337533"><B>Erikeltic</B>]]</span> <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#337533">Talk]]</span>)</span></sup> 11:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
4326 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4325 +++$+++ 4325 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.307649960E09 +++$+++ Well, darn, it's already been closed and removed... oh well. I'm sure he'll just add this to his conspiracy theory.  +++$+++ :Well, darn, it's already been closed and removed... oh well. I'm sure he'll just add this to his conspiracy theory. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 13:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
4327 +++$+++ Erikeltic +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4325 +++$+++ 4326 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.307660100E09 +++$+++ No doubt.   +++$+++ ::No doubt.  [[User:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#337533"><B>Erikeltic</B>]]</span> <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#337533">Talk]]</span>)</span></sup> 15:55, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

4328 +++$+++ Nidocamen +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-07 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.307430060E09 +++$+++ I am new here and am just trying to play by the rules, but it's difficult to sift thru everything.  thanks very much.  user:Nidocamen   +++$+++ I am new here and am just trying to play by the rules, but it's difficult to sift thru everything.  thanks very much.  user:Nidocamen  [[User:Nidocamen|Nidocamen]] ([[User talk:Nidocamen|talk]]) 00:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
4329 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4328 +++$+++ 4328 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.307430420E09 +++$+++ I nominated it because you shouldn't write about your own projects, and also because I don't believe it to be notable - one local article is not the significant coverage from reliable sources an article like this needs.  +++$+++ :I nominated it because you shouldn't write about your own projects, and also because I don't believe it to be notable - one local article is not the significant coverage from reliable sources an article like this needs. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 00:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

4331 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-07 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.307484060E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but I recommend not getting sucked in. His behavior is clear, and hopefully the ANI report will pan out.  +++$+++ Thanks, but I recommend not getting sucked in. His behavior is clear, and hopefully the ANI report will pan out. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 15:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
4332 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4331 +++$+++ 4331 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.307487240E09 +++$+++ Appreciate your help with the article and the edit warring report. If you have any thoughts on improving the article, please share them on the talk page.  +++$+++ :Appreciate your help with the article and the edit warring report. If you have any thoughts on improving the article, please share them on the talk page. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 15:54, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

4335 +++$+++ TEHodson +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4335 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-10 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.307699160E09 +++$+++ It's well-known that the film was shot at the real-life locations. What sort of online source would be considered acceptable? The only other reference is another site, which also discusses this, as do others. I don't know what a \"Tripod\" site is, so don't understand why it's not okay. Ideas on how to deal with it?-- +++$+++ It's well-known that the film was shot at the real-life locations. What sort of online source would be considered acceptable? The only other reference is another site, which also discusses this, as do others. I don't know what a "Tripod" site is, so don't understand why it's not okay. Ideas on how to deal with it?--[[User talk:TEHodson|TEHodson]] 02:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
4336 +++$+++ TEHodson +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4335 +++$+++ 4335 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.307700120E09 +++$+++ There are mentions of the real-life locations buried in reviews, but that doesn't seem a good source to me. It was an important decision the filmmakers made to shoot everything exactly where it really took place, so this should be in the article, but as the film was made so long ago I'm having trouble finding a source.-- +++$+++ :There are mentions of the real-life locations buried in reviews, but that doesn't seem a good source to me. It was an important decision the filmmakers made to shoot everything exactly where it really took place, so this should be in the article, but as the film was made so long ago I'm having trouble finding a source.--[[User talk:TEHodson|TEHodson]] 03:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

266480 +++$+++ Jwillbur +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266480 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-09 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.173505920E09 +++$+++ What is this article you created, [[Haiti-me]], about? It seems to be a random collection of Haiti-related links.  +++$+++ What is this article you created, [[Haiti-me]], about? It seems to be a random collection of Haiti-related links. [[User:Jwillbur|Jwillbur]] 21:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
266481 +++$+++ Jwillbur +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266480 +++$+++ 266480 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.173506940E09 +++$+++ Doh, I just moved the page to your user space at [[User:Mattisse\/Haiti-me]] before I saw your message that said \"you can delete it\". Any ways, now that it is in your user space, you can just put <nowiki>{{Db-author}}<\/nowiki> at the top and it will be speedily deleted.  +++$+++ :Doh, I just moved the page to your user space at [[User:Mattisse/Haiti-me]] before I saw your message that said "you can delete it". Any ways, now that it is in your user space, you can just put <nowiki>{{Db-author}}</nowiki> at the top and it will be speedily deleted. [[User:Jwillbur|Jwillbur]] 22:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

4337 +++$+++ Fly by Night +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-16 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.308280020E09 +++$+++ Hello there Mike. Just a little request. It seems that Twinkle, quite annoyingly, doesn't mark pages as patrolled even when you tag them for [[WP:CSD]], [[WP:PROD]] or [[WP:AFD]]. I've just come across an article, that you'd tagged for [[WP:CSD]] on the unpatrolled list. I'm sure you already know, but if you scroll down to the bottom of the article, there will be a little link in square brackets that says ''mark this page as patrolled''. If you click that the it'll get taken off the unpatrolled list and no-one else will come across it. It's not your fault, I know; it's Twinkle's. But until they fix it, it'd be great if you clicked that link just before you tagged an article. I've marked that one as patrolled. Sorry to be a pain. Keep up the good work. <span style=\"white-space:nowrap;\">\u2014  +++$+++ Hello there Mike. Just a little request. It seems that Twinkle, quite annoyingly, doesn't mark pages as patrolled even when you tag them for [[WP:CSD]], [[WP:PROD]] or [[WP:AFD]]. I've just come across an article, that you'd tagged for [[WP:CSD]] on the unpatrolled list. I'm sure you already know, but if you scroll down to the bottom of the article, there will be a little link in square brackets that says ''mark this page as patrolled''. If you click that the it'll get taken off the unpatrolled list and no-one else will come across it. It's not your fault, I know; it's Twinkle's. But until they fix it, it'd be great if you clicked that link just before you tagged an article. I've marked that one as patrolled. Sorry to be a pain. Keep up the good work. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">— [[User:Fly by Night|<span style="font-family:Segoe print">'''''Fly by Night'''''</span>]] <font color="#000000">([[User talk:Fly by Night|<span style="font-family:Segoe print">talk</span>]])</font></span> 20:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
4338 +++$+++ Fly by Night +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4337 +++$+++ 4337 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.308297960E09 +++$+++ Hello Mike, I've just come across another article that was marked for CSD, but not marked as patrolled. <span style=\"white-space:nowrap;\">\u2014  +++$+++ :Hello Mike, I've just come across another article that was marked for CSD, but not marked as patrolled. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">— [[User:Fly by Night|<span style="font-family:Segoe print">'''''Fly by Night'''''</span>]] <font color="#000000">([[User talk:Fly by Night|<span style="font-family:Segoe print">talk</span>]])</font></span> 01:06, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

266482 +++$+++ FreplySpang +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.173514440E09 +++$+++ The following message was posted to the page [[Your comments on Palakkad Fort]]. It seems to be for you. Cheers,  +++$+++ The following message was posted to the page [[Your comments on Palakkad Fort]]. It seems to be for you. Cheers, [[User_talk:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] 00:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
266483 +++$+++ FreplySpang +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266482 +++$+++ 266482 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.173514920E09 +++$+++ Oh yeah, a link might have been useful. Sorry! It's [[User talk:Ramananrv123]].  +++$+++ : Oh yeah, a link might have been useful. Sorry! It's [[User talk:Ramananrv123]]. [[User_talk:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] 00:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

4339 +++$+++ 76.90.111.117 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-17 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.308296640E09 +++$+++ Hi Mike, [[Billy Moses]] clearly passes A7 by being both a notable radio and television personality. Can you please explain why you marked the article for deletion? Thanks. [[Special:Contributions\/76.90.111.117|76.90.111.117]] ( +++$+++ Hi Mike, [[Billy Moses]] clearly passes A7 by being both a notable radio and television personality. Can you please explain why you marked the article for deletion? Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/76.90.111.117|76.90.111.117]] ([[User talk:76.90.111.117|talk]]) 00:44, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
4340 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4339 +++$+++ 4339 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.308296940E09 +++$+++ I don't see how a local person who (as mentioned in the article) failed on public access cable and only lasted three months on an AM radio station. He clearly does not meet the notability requirements.  +++$+++ :I don't see how a local person who (as mentioned in the article) failed on public access cable and only lasted three months on an AM radio station. He clearly does not meet the notability requirements. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 00:49, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

266484 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.173521040E09 +++$+++ Their \"terms of use\" are clearly not compatible with [[Wikipedia:Licensing]].  That said, some of their material would fall under ''[[Bridgeman v Corel]]'' (our {{tl|PD-art}}), and some of it appears to have been created by a United States soldier while in the course of their duties, and may not be eligible for copyright protection, but that would be difficult to establish without their assistance.  There's no harm in [[Wikipedia:Boilerplate requests for permission|writing them a polite note]] asking them to consider licensing some material under a free license.  The Hensley collection is [http:\/\/dsal.uchicago.edu\/images\/hensley\/ apparantly licensed] CC-BY-NC-ND, so it is unlikely that they will agree, given that they have already considered their options and chose something as restrictive as possible.    +++$+++ Their "terms of use" are clearly not compatible with [[Wikipedia:Licensing]].  That said, some of their material would fall under ''[[Bridgeman v Corel]]'' (our {{tl|PD-art}}), and some of it appears to have been created by a United States soldier while in the course of their duties, and may not be eligible for copyright protection, but that would be difficult to establish without their assistance.  There's no harm in [[Wikipedia:Boilerplate requests for permission|writing them a polite note]] asking them to consider licensing some material under a free license.  The Hensley collection is [http://dsal.uchicago.edu/images/hensley/ apparantly licensed] CC-BY-NC-ND, so it is unlikely that they will agree, given that they have already considered their options and chose something as restrictive as possible.   [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 02:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
266485 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266484 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.173524520E09 +++$+++ Western Chalukyas--> I have kept the dashed lines for these reasons. The Kannada and Sanskrit works about Wes..Cha.. history is very important from the view point of study of their geneology and chronology and is consistant with [[Hoysala Empire]], [[Rashtrakuta]]. In Vijayanagara Empire it was pushed into the citation because of the number of writings were too many. Regarding the dashed line in the lead, you are right, we dont have links to those temples (right now) unlike Hoysala Empire page where the three most famous temples were linked and explained in detail. I hate to take it out because we loose LEAD content. Let it be there for now untill I can think of more LEAD info. I corrected a factual error. The Eastern Chalukyas were cousins of Western Chalukyas. +++$+++ ::Western Chalukyas--> I have kept the dashed lines for these reasons. The Kannada and Sanskrit works about Wes..Cha.. history is very important from the view point of study of their geneology and chronology and is consistant with [[Hoysala Empire]], [[Rashtrakuta]]. In Vijayanagara Empire it was pushed into the citation because of the number of writings were too many. Regarding the dashed line in the lead, you are right, we dont have links to those temples (right now) unlike Hoysala Empire page where the three most famous temples were linked and explained in detail. I hate to take it out because we loose LEAD content. Let it be there for now untill I can think of more LEAD info. I corrected a factual error. The Eastern Chalukyas were cousins of Western Chalukyas.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

4341 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.308528180E09 +++$+++ I've declined the speedies for them because as far as I know human settlements are considered notable. Cheers.  +++$+++ I've declined the speedies for them because as far as I know human settlements are considered notable. Cheers. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] ([[User talk:CambridgeBayWeather|talk]]) 17:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
4342 +++$+++ Blue Square Thing +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4341 +++$+++ 4341 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.308532260E09 +++$+++ I can confirm that [[Henstead]], [[South Cove, Suffolk]] and [[North Cove]] are reasonable articles based on them being reasonable sized settlements (South Cove's a bit small perhaps, but it's probably just about OK unless I can find somewhere to merge it with), although Henstead might want to move to Henstead and Hulver Street eventually. They were on my list for creation at some point as it happens - hmmm... I'll keep an eye on the user though - might be an old friend back for some more.  +++$+++ :I can confirm that [[Henstead]], [[South Cove, Suffolk]] and [[North Cove]] are reasonable articles based on them being reasonable sized settlements (South Cove's a bit small perhaps, but it's probably just about OK unless I can find somewhere to merge it with), although Henstead might want to move to Henstead and Hulver Street eventually. They were on my list for creation at some point as it happens - hmmm... I'll keep an eye on the user though - might be an old friend back for some more. [[User:Blue Square Thing|Blue Square Thing]] ([[User talk:Blue Square Thing|talk]]) 18:11, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
4343 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4341 +++$+++ 4341 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.308635880E09 +++$+++ I can find no reliable sources that mention Warburton's connection to this film, except for articles where he brings it up himself. The promotional material released for the film at the American Film Market and Cannes do not mention him at all. Until you can provide reliable sources (and the [[Wikipedia:Citing IMDb|IMDB is not one]], in this case), please stop adding his name to the page.  +++$+++ :I can find no reliable sources that mention Warburton's connection to this film, except for articles where he brings it up himself. The promotional material released for the film at the American Film Market and Cannes do not mention him at all. Until you can provide reliable sources (and the [[Wikipedia:Citing IMDb|IMDB is not one]], in this case), please stop adding his name to the page. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 22:58, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
4344 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4341 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.308713940E09 +++$+++ Actually, anyone can add (or remove) credits from the IMDB at any time, unless an article is locked as \"listings complete\" by a production company. And even then, there's still some leeway given on the part of the editors so far. But what it all comes down to is that no official material released by NuImage or the filmmakers thus far mentions Warburton. Posting a contract on his website would still not be a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], and it would be completely unverifiable. Once the movie comes out with his name on it, or the production company officially releases something with his name on it, DO NOT add it back into the article. Further attempts to do so without reliable sourcing will be removed.  +++$+++ :::Actually, anyone can add (or remove) credits from the IMDB at any time, unless an article is locked as "listings complete" by a production company. And even then, there's still some leeway given on the part of the editors so far. But what it all comes down to is that no official material released by NuImage or the filmmakers thus far mentions Warburton. Posting a contract on his website would still not be a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], and it would be completely unverifiable. Once the movie comes out with his name on it, or the production company officially releases something with his name on it, DO NOT add it back into the article. Further attempts to do so without reliable sourcing will be removed. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 20:39, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

528631 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528631 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.164808560E09 +++$+++ I also am not sure that applying the formal sockpuppet tags is appropriate in this instance. According to his userpage, and corroborated frankly by his behavior, this user is a junior-high-school student. He is overly full of enthusiasm but apparently is not ready to participate in Wikipedia, and unfortunately is probably headed for a Wiki-vacation of non-trivial length if he doesn't start accepting advice, but I think we need to be humane about how we handle the process. There is general agreement that the younger users are full-fledged Wikipedians and join the project and take their lumps with the rest of us, and most of them wouldn't have it any other way, but sometimes one needs to keep things like that in perspective. Especially when the user is ill-advisedly using his full name as his username and whatever is written on his pages may follow him around for awhile. Just some thoughts for what, if anything, they might be worth. Regards,  +++$+++ I also am not sure that applying the formal sockpuppet tags is appropriate in this instance. According to his userpage, and corroborated frankly by his behavior, this user is a junior-high-school student. He is overly full of enthusiasm but apparently is not ready to participate in Wikipedia, and unfortunately is probably headed for a Wiki-vacation of non-trivial length if he doesn't start accepting advice, but I think we need to be humane about how we handle the process. There is general agreement that the younger users are full-fledged Wikipedians and join the project and take their lumps with the rest of us, and most of them wouldn't have it any other way, but sometimes one needs to keep things like that in perspective. Especially when the user is ill-advisedly using his full name as his username and whatever is written on his pages may follow him around for awhile. Just some thoughts for what, if anything, they might be worth. Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 05:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
528632 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528631 +++$+++ 528631 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.164809340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your note. I don't think the tags on the other pages matter too much one way or another. If this situation doesn't improve in the next day or two either some admin is going to block him or at least it'll wind up posted on ANI for discussion. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks for your note. I don't think the tags on the other pages matter too much one way or another. If this situation doesn't improve in the next day or two either some admin is going to block him or at least it'll wind up posted on ANI for discussion. Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 06:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

266488 +++$+++ WeniWidiWiki +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.173569280E09 +++$+++ Hi. When looking at the contributions of {{ipuser|70.109.90.252}} I didn't notice any stalking going on, just some subtle vandalism and miscategorizing of articles, most of which were reverted by other editors. However none of these editors gave him any warnings, so I reverted the rest of his vandalism and warned him. When you notice a [[WP:SPA|single purpose IP]] engaging in untoward editing, it is helpful to look at their contributions and then warn them right away to document their negative edits in case their behaviour escalates. Use one of these [[Wikipedia:Template_messages\/User_talk_namespace\/Multi_level_details|templates]]. Thanks! -  +++$+++ Hi. When looking at the contributions of {{ipuser|70.109.90.252}} I didn't notice any stalking going on, just some subtle vandalism and miscategorizing of articles, most of which were reverted by other editors. However none of these editors gave him any warnings, so I reverted the rest of his vandalism and warned him. When you notice a [[WP:SPA|single purpose IP]] engaging in untoward editing, it is helpful to look at their contributions and then warn them right away to document their negative edits in case their behaviour escalates. Use one of these [[Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace/Multi_level_details|templates]]. Thanks! - [[User:WeniWidiWiki|WeniWidiWiki]] 15:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
266489 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266488 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.173589140E09 +++$+++ Hoysala architecture-->I believe that citation already exists in the Research section, but adding one more citation does not hurt. +++$+++ ::Hoysala architecture-->I believe that citation already exists in the Research section, but adding one more citation does not hurt.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
266490 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266488 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.173593940E09 +++$+++ Oh! I forgot to cite that. Its the first few lines of the paragraphs \"Notable craftsman\". The citation should have come from the web page by S.Settar or Githa U.B. +++$+++ :: Oh! I forgot to cite that. Its the first few lines of the paragraphs "Notable craftsman". The citation should have come from the web page by S.Settar or Githa U.B.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
266491 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266488 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.173596400E09 +++$+++ No. got busy with [[Chavundaraya]] Why dont you add your citation? +++$+++ ::No. got busy with [[Chavundaraya]] Why dont you add your citation?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

4345 +++$+++ Gherman317 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4345 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-25 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.309045800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Gherman317|Gherman317]] ([[User talk:Gherman317|talk]]) 16:50, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
4346 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4345 +++$+++ 4345 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.309046580E09 +++$+++ I tagged it as Unambiguous advertising or promotion because that's what it appeared to be. Large parts of it were cut and pasted directly from (ar barely rewritten from) a number of pages on the organization's website - it might as well have been an extension of the website. Much of what was there was designed to promote the company, did not appear to be encyclopedic, and it appears that an administrator (who actually deleted it) agreed with that assessment. As to your comments about other pages, I would advise you to look at [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]]. Also, are you connected to the organization? If so, you have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] and should not be creating articles about them.  +++$+++ :I tagged it as Unambiguous advertising or promotion because that's what it appeared to be. Large parts of it were cut and pasted directly from (ar barely rewritten from) a number of pages on the organization's website - it might as well have been an extension of the website. Much of what was there was designed to promote the company, did not appear to be encyclopedic, and it appears that an administrator (who actually deleted it) agreed with that assessment. As to your comments about other pages, I would advise you to look at [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]]. Also, are you connected to the organization? If so, you have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] and should not be creating articles about them. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 17:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

4349 +++$+++ Monty845 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4349 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-26 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.309144920E09 +++$+++ Just letting you know I have removed your CSD A10 from [[Ultimate muscle]]. At the time you tagged the page, it had been already been converted to a redirect. I presume you intended to tag the pre-redirect version, as an A10 on a redirect doesn't make much sense.  +++$+++ Just letting you know I have removed your CSD A10 from [[Ultimate muscle]]. At the time you tagged the page, it had been already been converted to a redirect. I presume you intended to tag the pre-redirect version, as an A10 on a redirect doesn't make much sense. [[User:Monty845|<font color="Green">Monty</font>]][[User talk:Monty845|<small><sub><font color="#A3BFBF">845</font></sub></small>]] 20:22, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
4350 +++$+++ Monty845 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4349 +++$+++ 4349 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.309145040E09 +++$+++ Oh and I have no objection to another A10 if the redirect gets overwritten.  +++$+++ :Oh and I have no objection to another A10 if the redirect gets overwritten. [[User:Monty845|<font color="Green">Monty</font>]][[User talk:Monty845|<small><sub><font color="#A3BFBF">845</font></sub></small>]] 20:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
4351 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4349 +++$+++ 4350 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.309145160E09 +++$+++ Must have been a cross-post - when I tagged it it was a massive cut-n-paste job from another page...  +++$+++ ::Must have been a cross-post - when I tagged it it was a massive cut-n-paste job from another page... [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 20:26, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

266494 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.173604800E09 +++$+++ Is ready for copy edits before DYK.thanks. +++$+++ Is ready for copy edits before DYK.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266495 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266494 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.173610560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for coming in. +++$+++ ::Thanks for coming in.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266496 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266494 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.173610860E09 +++$+++ I will let you drive now. +++$+++ ::I will let you drive now.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 04:01, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

4352 +++$+++  +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4352 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309256280E09 +++$+++ I didn't use G4 because the previous version was not deleted as a result of a discussion; it was a CSD... or is that me interpreting G4 too much \"to the letter\"?  +++$+++ I didn't use G4 because the previous version was not deleted as a result of a discussion; it was a CSD... or is that me interpreting G4 too much "to the letter"? [[User:Strikerforce|<font color="3333cc">'''Striker'''</font><font color="330099">'''force'''</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Strikerforce|<font color="3333cc">Talk</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Editor_review/Strikerforce|<font color="3333cc">Review me!</font>]]</sup> 03:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
4353 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4352 +++$+++ 4352 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.309256520E09 +++$+++ Actually, it was... [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Her Name Is Murder Productions]] was in March. It was also deleted yesterday, too. This will be the fourth time, according to the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Her+Name+Is+Murder+Productions deletion logs].  +++$+++ :Actually, it was... [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Her Name Is Murder Productions]] was in March. It was also deleted yesterday, too. This will be the fourth time, according to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Her+Name+Is+Murder+Productions deletion logs]. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 03:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
4354 +++$+++  +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4352 +++$+++ 4353 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.309257480E09 +++$+++ Ahhh, gotcha. I was only aware of the deletion from yesterday. Carry on. LOL  +++$+++ ::Ahhh, gotcha. I was only aware of the deletion from yesterday. Carry on. LOL [[User:Strikerforce|<font color="3333cc">'''Striker'''</font><font color="330099">'''force'''</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Strikerforce|<font color="3333cc">Talk</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Editor_review/Strikerforce|<font color="3333cc">Review me!</font>]]</sup> 03:38, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

266497 +++$+++ Vimalkalyan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 10:15:00 +++$+++ 1.173633300E09 +++$+++ Hi, i noticed that you started the article on Ikshvaku dynasty. I have copies of Ramayan (Valmiki, Sri Sathya Sai Baba) and incorporated the lineage of the Ikshvaku dynasty as present in these books. Pls provide feedback  +++$+++ Hi, i noticed that you started the article on Ikshvaku dynasty. I have copies of Ramayan (Valmiki, Sri Sathya Sai Baba) and incorporated the lineage of the Ikshvaku dynasty as present in these books. Pls provide feedback [[User:Vimalkalyan|Kalyan]] 10:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266498 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.173652980E09 +++$+++ In you article [[Indian inscriptions]], the Ashokan inscriptions are in Prakrit language and script. Pali was also used frequently, not Tamil-Brahmi. Tamil-Brahmi inscriptions indicate Brahmi script modified to write Tamil Language and are from the early Cholas and Pandyas. You may want to refer back to this info in your book. This link may help.[http:\/\/www.hinduonnet.com\/lr\/2003\/08\/03\/stories\/2003080300280400.htm] +++$+++ ::In you article [[Indian inscriptions]], the Ashokan inscriptions are in Prakrit language and script. Pali was also used frequently, not Tamil-Brahmi. Tamil-Brahmi inscriptions indicate Brahmi script modified to write Tamil Language and are from the early Cholas and Pandyas. You may want to refer back to this info in your book. This link may help.[http://www.hinduonnet.com/lr/2003/08/03/stories/2003080300280400.htm][[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266499 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.173653820E09 +++$+++ ;The link goes to an article in the Hindu news paper. Also by rosewood cieling image is in [[Keladi Nayaka]] page. How does [[Chavundaraya]] look for DYK? (it is already nominated) +++$+++ :;The link goes to an article in the Hindu news paper. Also by rosewood cieling image is in [[Keladi Nayaka]] page. How does [[Chavundaraya]] look for DYK? (it is already nominated)[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266500 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ 266499 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.173659160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the copy edit. Somehow articles always look better after they get your blessings.!! +++$+++ ::Thanks for the copy edit. Somehow articles always look better after they get your blessings.!![[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266501 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ 266499 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.173664740E09 +++$+++ In what context is this? +++$+++ ::In what context is this?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266502 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ 266499 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.173669240E09 +++$+++ I saw that page but was not sure if it had anything to do with any of the articles we are working on? or was this a general issue? +++$+++ :: I saw that page but was not sure if it had anything to do with any of the articles we are working on? or was this a general issue?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:14, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266503 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ 266502 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.173669540E09 +++$+++ It means that if his name is linked on another page, the reader will be sent to the disambiguation page. Usually, editors want to avoid that. -- +++$+++ :::It means that if his name is linked on another page, the reader will be sent to the disambiguation page. Usually, editors want to avoid that. --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 20:19, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266504 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ 266499 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.173670260E09 +++$+++ Well I would worry about it if it had something to dowith our current topics. Oh! Isee he is probably referenced on Shravanabelagola page.That would be the earliest Chandragupta. +++$+++ ::Well I would worry about it if it had something to dowith our current topics. Oh! Isee he is probably referenced on Shravanabelagola page.That would be the earliest Chandragupta.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266505 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ 266499 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.173675120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for copy edits on Rashtrakuta. Just make sure everytime you restart a copyedit process after a break to look at the History. The Vandals have not come back for some time but one never knows and you dont want to loose your edits. This is going to be a big one. +++$+++ ::Thanks for copy edits on Rashtrakuta. Just make sure everytime you restart a copyedit process after a break to look at the History. The Vandals have not come back for some time but one never knows and you dont want to loose your edits. This is going to be a big one.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266506 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ 266499 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.173675420E09 +++$+++ Hope not. Two ran away. One was banned. Also the items you have marked unclear are pretty clear. The earliest extant literature in Kannada is from their court poets and the royalty themselves. All their inscriptions are in Kannada and Sanskrit. +++$+++ ::Hope not. Two ran away. One was banned. Also the items you have marked unclear are pretty clear. The earliest extant literature in Kannada is from their court poets and the royalty themselves. All their inscriptions are in Kannada and Sanskrit.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266507 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ 266499 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.173675720E09 +++$+++ I though it was!! Anyway, I have changed it now:) +++$+++ ::I though it was!! Anyway, I have changed it now:)[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266508 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ 266499 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.173675720E09 +++$+++ Both. I have rectified it. +++$+++ ::Both. I have rectified it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
266509 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266497 +++$+++ 266499 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.173684180E09 +++$+++ Its there in my book. I guess its Englich. +++$+++ ::Its there in my book. I guess its Englich.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

471513 +++$+++ Pascal.Tesson +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471513 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-30 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.185862500E09 +++$+++ Feel free to undelete if you think this is the best course of action. I must say I did not give it too much thought and you seem to be much more aware of the whole situation. Cheers,  +++$+++ Feel free to undelete if you think this is the best course of action. I must say I did not give it too much thought and you seem to be much more aware of the whole situation. Cheers, [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] 23:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
471514 +++$+++ Pascal.Tesson +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471513 +++$+++ 471513 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.185876960E09 +++$+++ Ah yes of course, you're not an admin... I don't claim to know you that well as an editor but my first reaction is that this '''does not make any sense'''. You've been here since basically forever and as far as I know you're not prone to getting into nasty conflicts. If you're interested, I'm very much ready to look into nominating you for adminship (I'd just have to take a bit of time to spot check your contributions to make sure I'm completely comfortable). In any case, unless you expect a particular issue to really blow up in your face, going through RfA is [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Mattbr|really]], [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Mike Peel|really]], [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Pascal.Tesson 2|easy]] ([[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Pascal.Tesson|though not always]]). And being an admin does not mean you have to give up editing and trust me, blocking vandals is so boring I guarantee you won't want to spend that much time doing it. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Ah yes of course, you're not an admin... I don't claim to know you that well as an editor but my first reaction is that this '''does not make any sense'''. You've been here since basically forever and as far as I know you're not prone to getting into nasty conflicts. If you're interested, I'm very much ready to look into nominating you for adminship (I'd just have to take a bit of time to spot check your contributions to make sure I'm completely comfortable). In any case, unless you expect a particular issue to really blow up in your face, going through RfA is [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mattbr|really]], [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mike Peel|really]], [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pascal.Tesson 2|easy]] ([[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pascal.Tesson|though not always]]). And being an admin does not mean you have to give up editing and trust me, blocking vandals is so boring I guarantee you won't want to spend that much time doing it. Cheers, [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] 03:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
471515 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471513 +++$+++ 471514 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.185903300E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I think the tipping point will come when (a) I really need the tools (I've managed well without them, so far) and (b) if I ever feel that things change so much around here that the time has come to stand up and be counted. I do have a couple of other people hanging on a nomination, so I'll have to think about that as well. I do intend to rummage through my archives and let everyone who brought this topic up know if and when I do intend put my name forward.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. I think the tipping point will come when (a) I really need the tools (I've managed well without them, so far) and (b) if I ever feel that things change so much around here that the time has come to stand up and be counted. I do have a couple of other people hanging on a nomination, so I'll have to think about that as well. I do intend to rummage through my archives and let everyone who brought this topic up know if and when I do intend put my name forward. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 10:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

4356 +++$+++ Spicejohnson +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Spicejohnson|Spicejohnson]] ([[User talk:Spicejohnson|talk]]) 28 June 2011 15:01 (UTC)
4357 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4356 +++$+++ 4356 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.309298760E09 +++$+++ Those articles are generally properly referenced, where the characters have some notoriety outside of the franchise. These do not. Taking away the massive amount of [[WP:OR|original research]] you add to these articles, there is nothing on that page that really can't be found at [[Open Season (film series)]]. Also, given your history of adding rumors and outright false information (I've corrected the inaccuracies in the release chart, BTW), I think any potential article about those characters would be better written by someone less involved than you.  +++$+++ :Those articles are generally properly referenced, where the characters have some notoriety outside of the franchise. These do not. Taking away the massive amount of [[WP:OR|original research]] you add to these articles, there is nothing on that page that really can't be found at [[Open Season (film series)]]. Also, given your history of adding rumors and outright false information (I've corrected the inaccuracies in the release chart, BTW), I think any potential article about those characters would be better written by someone less involved than you. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 15:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

525014 +++$+++ AED +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-30 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.143728760E09 +++$+++ I was wondering if you might take a look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Whatlinkshere\/Topical_anesthetic this link]. Is it possible for an adminstrator to single-handedly remove the 38 redirect pages that are in place only to cover spelling errors or must it go to a vote? Thanks! - +++$+++ I was wondering if you might take a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/Topical_anesthetic this link]. Is it possible for an adminstrator to single-handedly remove the 38 redirect pages that are in place only to cover spelling errors or must it go to a vote? Thanks! -[[User:AED|AED]] 06:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
525015 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525014 +++$+++ 525014 +++$+++ 2006-03-30 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.143746760E09 +++$+++ I don't know what the policy is for extraneous redirects, so I'd rather it went to a vote, so there was a paper trail. (But if you can point me to a relevant policy, then I'd be happy to perform the necessary deletions. I'm not always up-to-date on policy, so I tend to be conservative about things like that.) -- +++$+++ :I don't know what the policy is for extraneous redirects, so I'd rather it went to a vote, so there was a paper trail. (But if you can point me to a relevant policy, then I'd be happy to perform the necessary deletions. I'm not always up-to-date on policy, so I tend to be conservative about things like that.) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 11:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
525016 +++$+++ AED +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525014 +++$+++ 525015 +++$+++ 2006-03-30 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.143766080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply. I understand your concerns. I don't forsee any huge problem with letting them stay, but I may take them to [[Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion]] eventually. - +++$+++ ::Thanks for the reply. I understand your concerns. I don't forsee any huge problem with letting them stay, but I may take them to [[Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion]] eventually. -[[User:AED|AED]] 16:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

4358 +++$+++ Spicejohnson +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309299480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Spicejohnson|Spicejohnson]] ([[User talk:Spicejohnson|talk]]) 15:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
4359 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4358 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.309299660E09 +++$+++ If you repeatedly recreate something that multiple administrators have deleted as unnecessary, you could be blocked.  +++$+++ ::If you repeatedly recreate something that multiple administrators have deleted as unnecessary, you could be blocked. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 15:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

4360 +++$+++ Toyzndahood +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.309312260E09 +++$+++ I didn't had no idea the ''Open Season'' template was already created by someone else, this was all of a sudden and a coincidence.-- +++$+++ I didn't had no idea the ''Open Season'' template was already created by someone else, this was all of a sudden and a coincidence.--[[User:Toyzndahood|Toyzndahood]] ([[User talk:Toyzndahood|talk]]) 18:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
4361 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4360 +++$+++ 4360 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.309312560E09 +++$+++ I'm sure. How about we let the sockpuppet investigation let us know for certain, m'kay?  +++$+++ :I'm sure. How about we let the sockpuppet investigation let us know for certain, m'kay? [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 18:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

88108 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Moonraker +++$+++ 88108 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.311821700E09 +++$+++ Hi.  You added info to this article today.  Would you kindly add a citation to your source?  Thanks!  --  +++$+++ Hi.  You added info to this article today.  Would you kindly add a citation to your source?  Thanks!  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 19:55, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
88109 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Moonraker +++$+++ 88108 +++$+++ 88108 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.311829920E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  --  +++$+++ :Thanks!  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 22:12, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
88110 +++$+++ Moonraker +++$+++ Moonraker +++$+++ 88108 +++$+++ 88109 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311829980E09 +++$+++ No trouble.  +++$+++ ::No trouble. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker#top|talk]]) 22:13, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

4363 +++$+++ EncyMind +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4363 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-29 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.309396740E09 +++$+++ For your own good, cease and desist from vandalizing my work and stalking me.  You are not qualified on matters literary or cultural.   I am awaiting a call back from Wikimedia Foundation's legal counsel.  Any further trashing of my work, without knowledge or basis for doing so, will be provided as proof of gender bias in the treatment of female editors and content.  Remember, I am a lawyer.   +++$+++ For your own good, cease and desist from vandalizing my work and stalking me.  You are not qualified on matters literary or cultural.   I am awaiting a call back from Wikimedia Foundation's legal counsel.  Any further trashing of my work, without knowledge or basis for doing so, will be provided as proof of gender bias in the treatment of female editors and content.  Remember, I am a lawyer.  [[User:EncyMind|EncyMind]] ([[User talk:EncyMind|talk]]) 18:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
4364 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4363 +++$+++ 4363 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309408440E09 +++$+++ And with that, you got blocked. Bye!  +++$+++ :And with that, you got blocked. Bye! [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 21:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

4365 +++$+++ Jamesallen2 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4365 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-02 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.309595460E09 +++$+++ I will do the best I can to fix\/clean the article I created in editing and etc. Thank you for clearing some things up, I am just trying to understand!  +++$+++ I will do the best I can to fix/clean the article I created in editing and etc. Thank you for clearing some things up, I am just trying to understand! [[User:Jamesallen2|Jamesallen2]] ([[User talk:Jamesallen2|talk]]) 01:31, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
4366 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4365 +++$+++ 4365 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309599240E09 +++$+++ We already have [[Monsters University]].  +++$+++ :We already have [[Monsters University]]. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 02:34, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

266510 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-12 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.173697800E09 +++$+++ Thanks, -  +++$+++ Thanks, - [[User:KNM|KNM]] <sup> '''[[:User_talk:KNM|Talk]]'''</sup> 04:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
266511 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266510 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.173738540E09 +++$+++ Good job. You should have included info on copper plate inscriptions which are almost as common as stone inscriptions. +++$+++ ::Good job. You should have included info on copper plate inscriptions which are almost as common as stone inscriptions.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
266512 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266510 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.173739200E09 +++$+++ I have added a 745 CE Kannada inscription image I have from Badami to your DYK (in fact my friend took this photograph) and I believe you have put it in your user page too. We should be able to get an image of a copper plate inscription from somewhere (Tamil Language page). Maybe you want to add, \"inscriptions are generally of two kinds Stone (called ''Shilashasana'') and copper plate (''Tamarashasana'')\". In fact we can get more detailed and specify what purposes required copper plates and what admin purposes need stone inscription. We can further get sohpisticated and add slab\/pillar types etc. +++$+++ ::I have added a 745 CE Kannada inscription image I have from Badami to your DYK (in fact my friend took this photograph) and I believe you have put it in your user page too. We should be able to get an image of a copper plate inscription from somewhere (Tamil Language page). Maybe you want to add, "inscriptions are generally of two kinds Stone (called ''Shilashasana'') and copper plate (''Tamarashasana'')". In fact we can get more detailed and specify what purposes required copper plates and what admin purposes need stone inscription. We can further get sohpisticated and add slab/pillar types etc.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
266513 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266510 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.173742200E09 +++$+++ Nothing in particular, that you need to do regarding the DYK nom. If there are any concerns raised by anyone, I'll let you know. Thanks. -  +++$+++ ::Nothing in particular, that you need to do regarding the DYK nom. If there are any concerns raised by anyone, I'll let you know. Thanks. - [[User:KNM|KNM]] <sup> '''[[:User_talk:KNM|Talk]]'''</sup> 16:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
266514 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266510 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.173753840E09 +++$+++ Yes, why not?. Rashtrakuta will come after western chalukya anyway. My [[Kambadahalli]] images from 8th century will suffice for now. +++$+++ ::Yes, why not?. Rashtrakuta will come after western chalukya anyway. My [[Kambadahalli]] images from 8th century will suffice for now.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

4367 +++$+++ Robsinden +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 08:58:00 +++$+++ 1.309795080E09 +++$+++ I'd like to bring your attention to [[Talk:Monsters_University#Changed_to_redirect_as_fails_WP:NFF|this discussion]] where consensus was to redirect.  However, I see that the page has been created again, despite little further development.  Would appreciate your input on the talk page.  -- +++$+++ I'd like to bring your attention to [[Talk:Monsters_University#Changed_to_redirect_as_fails_WP:NFF|this discussion]] where consensus was to redirect.  However, I see that the page has been created again, despite little further development.  Would appreciate your input on the talk page.  --[[User:Robsinden|Rob Sinden]] ([[User talk:Robsinden|talk]]) 08:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
4368 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4367 +++$+++ 4367 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.309910640E09 +++$+++ No, as a matter of fact, it's not. A Google search on [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=%22Sloan+Crandell%22+%2Bdiamond \"Sloan Crandell\" diamond] shows no results outside of the Wikipedia page you created. The search link you posted is useless, as it's too broad to give accurate results. A more accurate one would be a search on [http:\/\/www.google.com\/#q=%22Diamond+programming+language%22&hl=en&prmd=ivns&ei=rkMTTquZGcLq0gGr05y7Dg&start=10&fp=1ec92a21f3882047 \"Diamond programming language\"], which only comes up with 12 unique returns. I stand by my original reasoning - I see nothing about your \"Diamond programming language\" that's notable enough for an article at this time.  +++$+++ :No, as a matter of fact, it's not. A Google search on [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Sloan+Crandell%22+%2Bdiamond "Sloan Crandell" diamond] shows no results outside of the Wikipedia page you created. The search link you posted is useless, as it's too broad to give accurate results. A more accurate one would be a search on [http://www.google.com/#q=%22Diamond+programming+language%22&hl=en&prmd=ivns&ei=rkMTTquZGcLq0gGr05y7Dg&start=10&fp=1ec92a21f3882047 "Diamond programming language"], which only comes up with 12 unique returns. I stand by my original reasoning - I see nothing about your "Diamond programming language" that's notable enough for an article at this time. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 17:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

584991 +++$+++ Geologyguy +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-27 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.204108080E09 +++$+++ Hello - I've begun using Rollback and wanted to let you know I really appreciate it!  Thanks much! Cheers  +++$+++ Hello - I've begun using Rollback and wanted to let you know I really appreciate it!  Thanks much! Cheers [[User:Geologyguy|Geologyguy]] ([[User talk:Geologyguy|talk]]) 02:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
584992 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584991 +++$+++ 584991 +++$+++ 2008-02-27 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.204108500E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! Glad it's been useful!  +++$+++ :You're welcome! Glad it's been useful! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 02:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

4370 +++$+++ Notshane +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.309917600E09 +++$+++ How is that a test edit? Mel Blanc died in 1989, and your saying its possible that he somehow came back to life in 2011 to voice daffy again? That is not a test edit, that's the truth.  +++$+++ How is that a test edit? Mel Blanc died in 1989, and your saying its possible that he somehow came back to life in 2011 to voice daffy again? That is not a test edit, that's the truth. [[User:Notshane|<font color="black">'''Notshane'''</font>]] ([[User_talk:Notshane|<font color="black">'''Talk'''</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Notshane|<font color="black">'''Contributions'''</font>]]) 19:00, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
4371 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4370 +++$+++ 4370 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.309935660E09 +++$+++ Read the page, and my edit summary. Blanc will be voicing Daffy in a new cartoon this year. Do not remove the mention again.  +++$+++ :Read the page, and my edit summary. Blanc will be voicing Daffy in a new cartoon this year. Do not remove the mention again. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 00:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

266515 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-12 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.173753840E09 +++$+++ Also, we should work on making Indian inscriptions in FA in the future. +++$+++ Also, we should work on making Indian inscriptions in FA in the future.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
266516 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266515 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.173767880E09 +++$+++ You are right. There are several monuments in Ellora but it is unviersally known that the grand piece of Ellora \"Kailasanatha\" temple was built by the Rashtrakutas. What does your book say about that.Yes there are several theories on the Rashtrakutas and much of it has been documented in the \"origin\" section with citations from over 10 scholars. +++$+++ ::You are right. There are several monuments in Ellora but it is unviersally known that the grand piece of Ellora "Kailasanatha" temple was built by the Rashtrakutas. What does your book say about that.Yes there are several theories on the Rashtrakutas and much of it has been documented in the "origin" section with citations from over 10 scholars.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
266517 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266515 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.173768120E09 +++$+++ My book agrees that the grandest was built by them. Yes. But also, the artisan situation was very complex and maybe this would be an opportunity to get into more of that. Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::My book agrees that the grandest was built by them. Yes. But also, the artisan situation was very complex and maybe this would be an opportunity to get into more of that. Sincerely, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 23:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
266518 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266515 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.173768960E09 +++$+++ Artisan's meaning Architects right? Maybe in the Architecture location.If there is anything really opposite to the stuff in the article, I would like see it. Can you scan it over to me? Or just type it. +++$+++ ::Artisan's meaning Architects right? Maybe in the Architecture location.If there is anything really opposite to the stuff in the article, I would like see it. Can you scan it over to me? Or just type it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
266519 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266515 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.173769860E09 +++$+++ How does this contradict anything in the article? If anything, it adds info that was previously not there. This is good stuff but perhaps in the subarticle \"Rashtrakuta Architecture\" which does not still exist. What do you think? However, If you can make it simple for the reader (which I know you can), there is no reason it should no be included here on the main page also. A book I have been planning to order \"Chalukyan architecture of [[Kanarese]] districts\" by Henry Cousens goes really into detail on sculptures etc just like the Hoysala book. But I though it would be better to do that after my India visit. +++$+++ ::How does this contradict anything in the article? If anything, it adds info that was previously not there. This is good stuff but perhaps in the subarticle "Rashtrakuta Architecture" which does not still exist. What do you think? However, If you can make it simple for the reader (which I know you can), there is no reason it should no be included here on the main page also. A book I have been planning to order "Chalukyan architecture of [[Kanarese]] districts" by Henry Cousens goes really into detail on sculptures etc just like the Hoysala book. But I though it would be better to do that after my India visit.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
266520 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266515 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.173769920E09 +++$+++ Modes of inscriptions? Do you mean languages? +++$+++ ::Modes of inscriptions? Do you mean languages?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
266521 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266515 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.173770280E09 +++$+++ I mean coins, carving in rock, carving on the wall of temples, writing on palm leaves and probably many other ways I don't know about. When you say, \"inscriptions show\", I wonder what kind of inscription -- besides the languages. Inscriptional evidence is found all over India, from what I can gather.  -- +++$+++ :::I mean coins, carving in rock, carving on the wall of temples, writing on palm leaves and probably many other ways I don't know about. When you say, "inscriptions show", I wonder what kind of inscription -- besides the languages. Inscriptional evidence is found all over India, from what I can gather.  --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 00:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
266522 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266515 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.173771300E09 +++$+++ Generally inscriptions mean Stone or copper plate, the most common types. Sometimes I do specify if the author specifies. If you read the page [[Origin of Rashtrakutas]] all the info on Emblems, Epithets, some info on coins is mentioned. By the 1st mellinium inner bark of leaves, conch shells etc had gone out of fashion for writing inscriptions. Good idea. Give me a list before I go and I will add to that my own list. But I must remember that my family will be with me partially atleast and I cant push the kids beyond a limit. Indian country side is still very rural. (But since I like to travel alone too which I normally do to do Wildlife Photography, I can stop off and be more rugged. Every 10 kms in Karnataka you will find an architectural GEM. Hoysala in the south, Western Chalukya and Vijayanagara in the centre, Badami Chalukya and Rashtrakuta in the north. not to forget Nayaka kingdoms, Mysore Kingdom). Looks like you are getting into the mood and talking complicated terms, just as I had figured you would once you get to have an affair with INDIA. +++$+++ ::Generally inscriptions mean Stone or copper plate, the most common types. Sometimes I do specify if the author specifies. If you read the page [[Origin of Rashtrakutas]] all the info on Emblems, Epithets, some info on coins is mentioned. By the 1st mellinium inner bark of leaves, conch shells etc had gone out of fashion for writing inscriptions. Good idea. Give me a list before I go and I will add to that my own list. But I must remember that my family will be with me partially atleast and I cant push the kids beyond a limit. Indian country side is still very rural. (But since I like to travel alone too which I normally do to do Wildlife Photography, I can stop off and be more rugged. Every 10 kms in Karnataka you will find an architectural GEM. Hoysala in the south, Western Chalukya and Vijayanagara in the centre, Badami Chalukya and Rashtrakuta in the north. not to forget Nayaka kingdoms, Mysore Kingdom). Looks like you are getting into the mood and talking complicated terms, just as I had figured you would once you get to have an affair with INDIA.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

4372 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4372 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.309990320E09 +++$+++ I declined the CSD on [[Confederate States Special Operations Command (CSSOCOM)]]. While I did not look closely, I see a substantial section [[Confederate_States_Special_Operations_Command_(CSSOCOM)#Confederate_States_Signal_Corps]] which does not appear to have a counterpart in [[Confederate Secret Service]]. Perhaps a merger, or merger discussion is appropriate. Do you think I've missed something?--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ I declined the CSD on [[Confederate States Special Operations Command (CSSOCOM)]]. While I did not look closely, I see a substantial section [[Confederate_States_Special_Operations_Command_(CSSOCOM)#Confederate_States_Signal_Corps]] which does not appear to have a counterpart in [[Confederate Secret Service]]. Perhaps a merger, or merger discussion is appropriate. Do you think I've missed something?--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 15:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
4373 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4372 +++$+++ 4372 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.309991340E09 +++$+++ That looks to have been copied directly from [[Signal Corps in the American Civil War#Confederate Signal Corps]] - I'm betting we'll find the entire article is cut'n'pasted from other existing articles...  +++$+++ :That looks to have been copied directly from [[Signal Corps in the American Civil War#Confederate Signal Corps]] - I'm betting we'll find the entire article is cut'n'pasted from other existing articles... [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 15:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
4374 +++$+++ Berean Hunter +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4372 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.309991580E09 +++$+++ The name of the article is most certainly an anachronism and no such organization existed. That said, I would recommend [[WP:AFD|AFD]] for the article. As yet, this user has not been adding citations on any of their contributions and it is time they start. A few of the articles they have created remain unreferenced.<br\/><span style=\"text-shadow:#294 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ :::The name of the article is most certainly an anachronism and no such organization existed. That said, I would recommend [[WP:AFD|AFD]] for the article. As yet, this user has not been adding citations on any of their contributions and it is time they start. A few of the articles they have created remain unreferenced.<br/><span style="text-shadow:#294 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; class=texhtml">[[User:Berean Hunter|<font face="High Tower Text" size="1px"><b style="color:#00C">⋙–Ber</b><b style="color:#66f">ean–Hun</b><b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b></font>]]</span> 15:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

528661 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528661 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-16 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.168980840E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for the Barnstar! I enjoy being part of WikiProject Wisconsin. Again, my thanks and appreciation. +++$+++ Many thanks for the Barnstar! I enjoy being part of WikiProject Wisconsin. Again, my thanks and appreciation.[[User:RFD|RFD]] 12:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
528662 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528661 +++$+++ 528661 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.169067420E09 +++$+++ The image was there when I sented the thank you note. I just left it there. I assumed the image was there for a purpose, so I left it alone. My apologies for any problems.  +++$+++ : The image was there when I sented the thank you note. I just left it there. I assumed the image was there for a purpose, so I left it alone. My apologies for any problems. [[User:RFD|RFD]] 12:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
528663 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528661 +++$+++ 528662 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.169067900E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your response.  +++$+++ :: Many thanks for your response. [[User:RFD|RFD]] 13:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

528665 +++$+++ Asher Heimermann +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528665 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-19 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.169208600E09 +++$+++ WHBL-AM has a new show... Information can be found on SheboyganTalk.com and Sheboygan-Press.com. I am not sure if those links are helpful, be I hope they are.  +++$+++ WHBL-AM has a new show... Information can be found on SheboyganTalk.com and Sheboygan-Press.com. I am not sure if those links are helpful, be I hope they are. [[User:Asher Heimermann|Asher Heimermann]] 04:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
528666 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528665 +++$+++ 528665 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.169208660E09 +++$+++ Thanks! What's up with Spaceport Sheboygan? I left a question on your talk page?  +++$+++ :Thanks! What's up with Spaceport Sheboygan? I left a question on your talk page? [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 04:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
528667 +++$+++ Asher Heimermann +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528665 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.169209260E09 +++$+++ I am not sure. I have not heard much. I been too much into my website (AsherHeimermann.com) and other sites. Sorry...  +++$+++ ::: I am not sure. I have not heard much. I been too much into my website (AsherHeimermann.com) and other sites. Sorry... [[User:Asher Heimermann|Asher Heimermann]] 04:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
528668 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528665 +++$+++ 528665 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.169209500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the response. I get into other things too. I'm going to be getting into the [[Great Midwest Trivia Contest]] next weekend!  +++$+++ :Thanks for the response. I get into other things too. I'm going to be getting into the [[Great Midwest Trivia Contest]] next weekend! [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 04:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

4378 +++$+++ Richardcavell +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.310241720E09 +++$+++ Hi. You recently [[WP:PROD|prodded]] two of my articles, [[In Pit Lane]] and [[No Limits (Australian TV series)]]. The first one I don't object to. The second article has been written up quite a lot in the mainstream press. However I no longer live in Victoria so I'm not in a position to find them right now. -  +++$+++ Hi. You recently [[WP:PROD|prodded]] two of my articles, [[In Pit Lane]] and [[No Limits (Australian TV series)]]. The first one I don't object to. The second article has been written up quite a lot in the mainstream press. However I no longer live in Victoria so I'm not in a position to find them right now. - [[User:Richardcavell|Richard Cavell]] ([[User talk:Richardcavell|talk]]) 13:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
4379 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4378 +++$+++ 4378 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.310269260E09 +++$+++ Have you bothered to read [[WP:FAKEARTICLE]], which I have linked to both times I removed the content from your userpage? Your userpage ''should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content.'' Your article has been userfied for you twice now ([[User:Jkinzler777\/John J. Powers (actor, comedian)|here]] and [[User:Jkinzler777\/John J. Powers (comedian)|here]]) - you should be editing on one of those, '''not''' your userpage.  +++$+++ :Have you bothered to read [[WP:FAKEARTICLE]], which I have linked to both times I removed the content from your userpage? Your userpage ''should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content.'' Your article has been userfied for you twice now ([[User:Jkinzler777/John J. Powers (actor, comedian)|here]] and [[User:Jkinzler777/John J. Powers (comedian)|here]]) - you should be editing on one of those, '''not''' your userpage. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 20:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

266523 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-13 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.173774000E09 +++$+++ I will be using this also and should be complete with the \"social life\" and \"Economy\", \"Language\" sections in a few weeks time.Then for peer review. +++$+++ I will be using this also and should be complete with the "social life" and "Economy", "Language" sections in a few weeks time.Then for peer review.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
266524 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.173775140E09 +++$+++ Do you like the roof sculptures on the [[Gangas]] page. I have added one of them to the Rashtrakuta page. Perhaps one more instead of the Mantapa? +++$+++ ::Do you like the roof sculptures on the [[Gangas]] page. I have added one of them to the Rashtrakuta page. Perhaps one more instead of the Mantapa?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
266525 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.173775920E09 +++$+++ I have corrected two issues, one in architecture and other about Imperial Kannauj to bring out the meaning of the citation. How can the Buddhist caves be built by Pandyan kings when they were nowhere in the picture. The Chalukyas ruled the whole os Maharashtra in the 7th century from Badami, karnataka. This is a mistake. The buddhist caves perhaps go back from 1st century-7th century, during the rule of Satavahanas, Vakatakas and Chalukyas of Badami.Please verify this. The Pandyas never even captured Karnataka, let alone Maharashtra. +++$+++ ::I have corrected two issues, one in architecture and other about Imperial Kannauj to bring out the meaning of the citation. How can the Buddhist caves be built by Pandyan kings when they were nowhere in the picture. The Chalukyas ruled the whole os Maharashtra in the 7th century from Badami, karnataka. This is a mistake. The buddhist caves perhaps go back from 1st century-7th century, during the rule of Satavahanas, Vakatakas and Chalukyas of Badami.Please verify this. The Pandyas never even captured Karnataka, let alone Maharashtra.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
266526 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.173824700E09 +++$+++ Just as I had figured. Its a Pandyan influence, not built by the Pandyan's themselves. I believe the wording was confusing. I shall re-add the phrase. please see if thats ok. Sounder Rajan is a well known art critic. +++$+++ ::Just as I had figured. Its a Pandyan influence, not built by the Pandyan's themselves. I believe the wording was confusing. I shall re-add the phrase. please see if thats ok. Sounder Rajan is a well known art critic.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
266527 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.173825840E09 +++$+++ I have rectified it. we need to be careful in judging what scholars say. Not your fault. The topic you have choosen, \"Indian Rock Cut architecture\" is a vast topic covering about 800 years of Buddhist\/Jain architecture and finally Hindu elements. Without a trip to Ellora, Ajanta and other places (Mahabalipuram) it would be tough to accomplish because you wont have the feel for it. You need to feel the sculpture (with your eyes) to understand what you read. Not trying to discourge you. Which is why I made it a point to visit Hoysala temples repeatedly (15 temples, some multiple times on consecutive years, and I am not done yet). Try to focus on DYK's untill you gain more confidence. This is a vast ocean you are in. +++$+++ ::I have rectified it. we need to be careful in judging what scholars say. Not your fault. The topic you have choosen, "Indian Rock Cut architecture" is a vast topic covering about 800 years of Buddhist/Jain architecture and finally Hindu elements. Without a trip to Ellora, Ajanta and other places (Mahabalipuram) it would be tough to accomplish because you wont have the feel for it. You need to feel the sculpture (with your eyes) to understand what you read. Not trying to discourge you. Which is why I made it a point to visit Hoysala temples repeatedly (15 temples, some multiple times on consecutive years, and I am not done yet). Try to focus on DYK's untill you gain more confidence. This is a vast ocean you are in.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
266528 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.173826260E09 +++$+++ The wording should not imply it was built by the Pandyans. Influence is something,occupation and construction is something else. artists from Pandya region (Tamil) may have been employed as artisans. +++$+++ ::The wording should not imply it was built by the Pandyans. Influence is something,occupation and construction is something else. artists from Pandya region (Tamil) may have been employed as artisans.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
266529 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.173826440E09 +++$+++ please see [[Kalugumalai]] in Tamil Nadu. +++$+++ ::please see [[Kalugumalai]] in Tamil Nadu.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:54, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

262874 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262874 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-19 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.205987880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:GrahamColm|Graham<font color="red">Colm</font>]][[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:38, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
262875 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262874 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.206579480E09 +++$+++ Glad you're back !  You missed the [[Genetics]] FAC, which got the usually amount of thunderous review from the medicine project.   +++$+++ ::Glad you're back !  You missed the [[Genetics]] FAC, which got the usually amount of thunderous review from the medicine project.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
262876 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262874 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.206580260E09 +++$+++ The [[AIDS]] FAR :-)   +++$+++ :::The [[AIDS]] FAR :-)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

528670 +++$+++ Asher Heimermann +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-22 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.169523360E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks so much for fixing the table on [[Sheboygan, Wisconsin]]. I got the idea from [[Sheboygan County]].  +++$+++ Hey, thanks so much for fixing the table on [[Sheboygan, Wisconsin]]. I got the idea from [[Sheboygan County]]. [[User:Asher Heimermann|Asher Heimermann]] 19:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
528671 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528670 +++$+++ 528670 +++$+++ 2007-01-22 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.169533140E09 +++$+++ You had the great idea of adding the infobox. I just fixed it for the city. You deserve kudos too!  +++$+++ :You had the great idea of adding the infobox. I just fixed it for the city. You deserve kudos too! [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 22:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
528672 +++$+++ Asher Heimermann +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528670 +++$+++ 528671 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.169619660E09 +++$+++ Please take a look at [[Spaceport Sheboygan]].  +++$+++ :: Please take a look at [[Spaceport Sheboygan]]. [[User:Asher Heimermann|Asher Heimermann]] 22:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

4383 +++$+++ DoctorHver +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.310350740E09 +++$+++ If your admin I think its better that you get yourself proper Icons to show it. If your not admin contact on and make him handle warnings on my page. +++$+++ If your admin I think its better that you get yourself proper Icons to show it. If your not admin contact on and make him handle warnings on my page.[[User:DoctorHver|DoctorHver]] ([[User talk:DoctorHver|talk]]) 19:19, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
4384 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4383 +++$+++ 4383 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310351220E09 +++$+++ I love your reasoning - it's not original research because I don't want it to be. Nice threats, by the way - you do know that admins take a very dim view of editors who exhibit [[WP:OWN|ownership]] issues and tell others to not edit articles? You'll notice I never told you that, just to find better sources.  +++$+++ :I love your reasoning - it's not original research because I don't want it to be. Nice threats, by the way - you do know that admins take a very dim view of editors who exhibit [[WP:OWN|ownership]] issues and tell others to not edit articles? You'll notice I never told you that, just to find better sources. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 19:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

528673 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-24 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.169636760E09 +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for the revert -- I couldn't tell what exactly was changed in the previous edits, but thankfully you were there. One question, was it tough for you to find the faulty edit? I'm wondering if my slight colorblindness has something to do with my difficulty in finding the changes.  +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for the revert -- I couldn't tell what exactly was changed in the previous edits, but thankfully you were there. One question, was it tough for you to find the faulty edit? I'm wondering if my slight colorblindness has something to do with my difficulty in finding the changes. [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Xiner|email]]) 03:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
528674 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528673 +++$+++ 528673 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.169637060E09 +++$+++ Morbid curiosity had me reading the DYK article. I noticed a wierd question mark that appeared to be out of place. I checked the history, and I determined that a warned vandal had made it, so I removed it.  +++$+++ :Morbid curiosity had me reading the DYK article. I noticed a wierd question mark that appeared to be out of place. I checked the history, and I determined that a warned vandal had made it, so I removed it. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 03:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

4386 +++$+++ Nongplubplub +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310423340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Nongplubplub|Nongplubplub]] ([[User talk:Nongplubplub|talk]]) 15:29, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
4387 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.310423820E09 +++$+++ Well, first off you should '''not''' be doing this on your userpage - that's a clear violation of policy, and you could get blocked if you continue to recreate it there. A better plan would be to work on it in your userspace, such as [[User:Nongplubplub\/Propplan]] before moving that back to an article when you think it's ready. However, I noticed that [[Propplan]] has already been speedy deleted once, so you need to be sure that you have valid references indicating notability and significant coverage - not just existence - otherwise you'll find it probably going down the same path again. Good luck.  +++$+++ :Well, first off you should '''not''' be doing this on your userpage - that's a clear violation of policy, and you could get blocked if you continue to recreate it there. A better plan would be to work on it in your userspace, such as [[User:Nongplubplub/Propplan]] before moving that back to an article when you think it's ready. However, I noticed that [[Propplan]] has already been speedy deleted once, so you need to be sure that you have valid references indicating notability and significant coverage - not just existence - otherwise you'll find it probably going down the same path again. Good luck. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 15:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
4388 +++$+++ Nongplubplub +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ 4387 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.310424360E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the clarity. Umm... I know this is going to be tough to answer, but how do they measure notability and coverage? Any ideas?  +++$+++ ::Thank you for the clarity. Umm... I know this is going to be tough to answer, but how do they measure notability and coverage? Any ideas? [[User:Nongplubplub|Nongplubplub]] ([[User talk:Nongplubplub|talk]]) 15:46, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
4389 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ 4388 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.310424660E09 +++$+++ Try reading [[WP:V|verifiability]] and [[WP:N|notability guidelines]] for starters. You're looking for significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  +++$+++ :::Try reading [[WP:V|verifiability]] and [[WP:N|notability guidelines]] for starters. You're looking for significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 15:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
4390 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310424960E09 +++$+++ Nah, just been around a while...  +++$+++ :::::Nah, just been around a while... [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 15:56, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
4391 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.310597400E09 +++$+++ Had you actually read the messages I left, you would realize that you have a clear conflict of interest in promoting your site, which you sgould not be doing. Any such continued attempts to promote your site by adding links will be removed, as per policy.  +++$+++ :Had you actually read the messages I left, you would realize that you have a clear conflict of interest in promoting your site, which you sgould not be doing. Any such continued attempts to promote your site by adding links will be removed, as per policy. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 15:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
4392 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310444940E09 +++$+++ Um, no, I got caught up in someone else's auto-block - please fix this...  +++$+++ :Um, no, I got caught up in someone else's auto-block - please fix this... [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 21:29, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
4393 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ 4392 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.310446680E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Thanks! [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 21:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
4394 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ 4386 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310507340E09 +++$+++ Because A) you followed improper procedure in creating a new page as opposed to moving the old one, and B) all the references I found from reliable sources call them \"The\" Shrinking Violets.  +++$+++ :Because A) you followed improper procedure in creating a new page as opposed to moving the old one, and B) all the references I found from reliable sources call them "The" Shrinking Violets. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 14:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

528675 +++$+++ Tjrudebeck +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-26 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.169824080E09 +++$+++ So, this week, the satircal newspaper [[The Onion]] did a story on [[Appleton, Wisconsin|Appleton]].  It's a cute little piece about how supposedly we have a thriving [[sex tourism]] industry.  Anyway, people keep adding the article as a reference link.  I wouldn't delete it using [[WP:SPAM]], because it's not an advertisement.  But it is completely unencyclopedic.  If it happens again, I'm going to request semiprotection.  +++$+++ So, this week, the satircal newspaper [[The Onion]] did a story on [[Appleton, Wisconsin|Appleton]].  It's a cute little piece about how supposedly we have a thriving [[sex tourism]] industry.  Anyway, people keep adding the article as a reference link.  I wouldn't delete it using [[WP:SPAM]], because it's not an advertisement.  But it is completely unencyclopedic.  If it happens again, I'm going to request semiprotection. [[User:Tjrudebeck|Thor Rudebeck]] 07:08, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
528676 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528675 +++$+++ 528675 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.169787240E09 +++$+++ I support keeping the link off the page, and I will help you watch the page. Thanks for the heads up!  +++$+++ :I support keeping the link off the page, and I will help you watch the page. Thanks for the heads up! [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 20:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

528679 +++$+++ Phil Boswell +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-30 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.170180840E09 +++$+++ HTH HAND \u2014 +++$+++ HTH HAND —[[User:Phil Boswell|Phil]] | [[User talk:Phil Boswell|Talk]] 10:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
528680 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528679 +++$+++ 528679 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.170190980E09 +++$+++ I'm hardly worried into the ground or uncalm. I don't understand how you made that assessment. I just wanted to make sure that he didn't do anything to get himself in trouble. He did something that I wouldn't do, so I asked for a second opinion to make sure that my reversion didn't go too far. Apparently I did. No harm, no foul.  +++$+++ :I'm hardly worried into the ground or uncalm. I don't understand how you made that assessment. I just wanted to make sure that he didn't do anything to get himself in trouble. He did something that I wouldn't do, so I asked for a second opinion to make sure that my reversion didn't go too far. Apparently I did. No harm, no foul. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 13:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

266537 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-13 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.173830580E09 +++$+++ Leave out the Satavahanas and Vakatakas. They contributed in Ajanta. +++$+++ Leave out the Satavahanas and Vakatakas. They contributed in Ajanta.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
266538 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266537 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.173831120E09 +++$+++ I saw the link you sent me. please be careful while referening to these blog sites. There coud be altered information there. They are not written by scholars. +++$+++ ::I saw the link you sent me. please be careful while referening to these blog sites. There coud be altered information there. They are not written by scholars.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

4395 +++$+++ Turn685 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310507760E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you put the copyright text tags on the Memphis page. I checked the source that the user in 2009 claimed was copied and the article has a few similarities but is not an exact duplicate (In fact the wiki article is greatly different). I was wondering if you checked out the claim like I did. -- +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you put the copyright text tags on the Memphis page. I checked the source that the user in 2009 claimed was copied and the article has a few similarities but is not an exact duplicate (In fact the wiki article is greatly different). I was wondering if you checked out the claim like I did. --[[User:Turn685|Turn685]] ([[User talk:Turn685|talk]]) 14:56, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
4396 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4395 +++$+++ 4395 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.310531640E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I'm not seeing anything more than blog entries and sites that I would consider questionable [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] - that, in addition to the prior AfD I found, led me to go ahead and put it up for AfD again.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I'm not seeing anything more than blog entries and sites that I would consider questionable [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] - that, in addition to the prior AfD I found, led me to go ahead and put it up for AfD again. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 21:34, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

266541 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-13 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.173839160E09 +++$+++ Scholars tend to identfy people\/artisans from the region they come from calling them a name based the Kingdom that ruled those people where they came from. A temple becomes Cholan if it is financed by the Cholas. If it is built by Chola artists but commissioned by Hoysalas, it becomes Cholan influence\/art\/touches in Hoysala architecture. +++$+++ Scholars tend to identfy people/artisans from the region they come from calling them a name based the Kingdom that ruled those people where they came from. A temple becomes Cholan if it is financed by the Cholas. If it is built by Chola artists but commissioned by Hoysalas, it becomes Cholan influence/art/touches in Hoysala architecture.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
266542 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266541 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.173839400E09 +++$+++ Vijayanagara architecture (cited in its page) is a combination of Hoysala, Chalukya, Pandya and Chola styles. Whom do we give the credit to? To the people who commissioned it!!. Kings\/Nobility\/rich landlords who funded projects just dont hand over money and walk away. They are involved in the planningg, rejecting some micro styles, accepting others based on their tastes\/likes\/dislikes. The architects and sculptors are free to make their decisions based on guidelines set to them by their paymasters.The credit goes to the commissioners. [[Chavundaraya]] is a good example.  +++$+++ ::Vijayanagara architecture (cited in its page) is a combination of Hoysala, Chalukya, Pandya and Chola styles. Whom do we give the credit to? To the people who commissioned it!!. Kings/Nobility/rich landlords who funded projects just dont hand over money and walk away. They are involved in the planningg, rejecting some micro styles, accepting others based on their tastes/likes/dislikes. The architects and sculptors are free to make their decisions based on guidelines set to them by their paymasters.The credit goes to the commissioners. [[Chavundaraya]] is a good example. [[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

4398 +++$+++ Jyenor86 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310602080E09 +++$+++ For example The Great Heep was not a spin-off film but a tv special based on the Droids cartoon. The Padawan Menace is virtually the same thing but a spin-off television special of The Clone Wars. It is not a small little short like the previous LEGO Star Wars specials but a full television length tv special. Only the third in the Star Wars franchsie and unlike those small shorts this is made by a major animation house. It is very much warranted inclusion on the template.  +++$+++ For example The Great Heep was not a spin-off film but a tv special based on the Droids cartoon. The Padawan Menace is virtually the same thing but a spin-off television special of The Clone Wars. It is not a small little short like the previous LEGO Star Wars specials but a full television length tv special. Only the third in the Star Wars franchsie and unlike those small shorts this is made by a major animation house. It is very much warranted inclusion on the template. [[User:Jyenor86|Jyenor86]] ([[User talk:Jyenor86|talk]]) 17:08, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
4399 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4398 +++$+++ 4398 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.310605020E09 +++$+++ No, it's not. That template is for in-universe content, which this \"special\" is not. It does not belong there.  +++$+++ :No, it's not. That template is for in-universe content, which this "special" is not. It does not belong there. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 17:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
4400 +++$+++ Jyenor86 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4398 +++$+++ 4399 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.310605560E09 +++$+++ This one is in-universe based on the reported plot. It takes place within the continuity of The Clone Wars 2008 animated series, just in lego form. There is nothing about what is reported that would make it out of universe like the web shorts. And it should not be confused with the webshorts, these are produced by a entirely different animation house. One that does feature files like Happy Feet.   +++$+++ ::This one is in-universe based on the reported plot. It takes place within the continuity of The Clone Wars 2008 animated series, just in lego form. There is nothing about what is reported that would make it out of universe like the web shorts. And it should not be confused with the webshorts, these are produced by a entirely different animation house. One that does feature files like Happy Feet.  [[User:Jyenor86|Jyenor86]] ([[User talk:Jyenor86|talk]]) 18:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
4401 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4398 +++$+++ 4400 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310605980E09 +++$+++ There is no way a Lego film can be in-universe. And the animation house has nothing to do with it. Furthermore, when they call something a \"standalone\" that features \"situations, characters and locations from throughout the entire Star Wars saga\", that's telling you it's out of continuity. Do not add it back into the template.  +++$+++ :::There is no way a Lego film can be in-universe. And the animation house has nothing to do with it. Furthermore, when they call something a "standalone" that features "situations, characters and locations from throughout the entire Star Wars saga", that's telling you it's out of continuity. Do not add it back into the template. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 18:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

393949 +++$+++ Thehelpfulbot +++$+++ RyanCross +++$+++ 393949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-27 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.243410780E09 +++$+++ <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #999933;padding:1px;\">[[User talk:Garden|<font style=\"color:#999933;\">&nbsp;'''GARDEN'''&nbsp;<\/font>]]<\/span><\/small>, <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #4B0082;padding:1px;\">&nbsp;[[User:iMatthew|<b>iMatthew<\/b>]] : [[User_talk:iMatthew|<font style=\"color:#ffffff;background:#4B0082;\">&nbsp;Chat&nbsp;<\/font>]] <\/span><\/small>, and [[User:Thehelpfulone|<font color=\"red\">'''The'''<\/font>]][[User_talk:Thehelpfulone|<font color=\"black\"> '''Helpful'''<\/font>]][[Special:Contributions\/Thehelpfulone|<font color=\"red\"> '''One'''<\/font>]] <\/span><\/font>  +++$+++ <small><span style="border:1px solid #999933;padding:1px;">[[User talk:Garden|<font style="color:#999933;">&nbsp;'''GARDEN'''&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small>, <small><span style="border:1px solid #4B0082;padding:1px;">&nbsp;[[User:iMatthew|<b>iMatthew</b>]] : [[User_talk:iMatthew|<font style="color:#ffffff;background:#4B0082;">&nbsp;Chat&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small>, and [[User:Thehelpfulone|<font color="red">'''The'''</font>]][[User_talk:Thehelpfulone|<font color="black"> '''Helpful'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Thehelpfulone|<font color="red"> '''One'''</font>]] </span></font> [[User:Thehelpfulbot|<font color="red">'''The'''</font>]][[User_talk:Thehelpfulone|<font color="black"> '''Helpful'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Thehelpfulbot|<font color="red"> '''Bot'''</font>]] 00:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
393950 +++$+++  +++$+++ RyanCross +++$+++ 393949 +++$+++ 393949 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ All scores are accurate as of 12:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ *All scores are accurate as of 12:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
393951 +++$+++  +++$+++ RyanCross +++$+++ 393949 +++$+++ 393949 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ All scores are accurate as of 17:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ *All scores are accurate as of 17:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

266544 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-13 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.173842280E09 +++$+++ The same goes for our lives. Arent we effected directly by decisions made in the White House? +++$+++ The same goes for our lives. Arent we effected directly by decisions made in the White House?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
266545 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266544 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-14 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.173855840E09 +++$+++ I fully appreciate your arguements. I have replied by email. also see[http:\/\/www.indoarch.org\/place.php?placelink=R%3D5%2BS%3D17%2BP%3D215%2BM%3D1018] in Andhr Pradesh. We have touched upon a topic that I dont have the knowledge or courage to argue with anyone. It takes a lifetime for historians to even scratch the surface and I dont think we should hastily pass opinions on it.Lets just get on with the FA. +++$+++ ::I fully appreciate your arguements. I have replied by email. also see[http://www.indoarch.org/place.php?placelink=R%3D5%2BS%3D17%2BP%3D215%2BM%3D1018] in Andhr Pradesh. We have touched upon a topic that I dont have the knowledge or courage to argue with anyone. It takes a lifetime for historians to even scratch the surface and I dont think we should hastily pass opinions on it.Lets just get on with the FA.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

528689 +++$+++  +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.171007820E09 +++$+++ Regards --  +++$+++ Regards -- [[User:Gearloose|G. Gearloose]] [[User Talk:Gearloose|''(?!)'']] aka [[:de:Benutzer:Duesentrieb]] 23:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
528690 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528689 +++$+++ 528689 +++$+++ 2007-02-09 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.171008300E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that. I'm giggling!  +++$+++ :Sorry about that. I'm giggling! [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 00:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

4402 +++$+++ GreenGuy2013 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310684880E09 +++$+++ Why are you removing that, Stop removing Ed, Edd n Eddy: EDventures. There is a source saying that it's actually happening.  +++$+++ Why are you removing that, Stop removing Ed, Edd n Eddy: EDventures. There is a source saying that it's actually happening. [[User:GreenGuy2013|GreenGuy2013]] ([[User talk:GreenGuy2013|talk]]) 16:08, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
4403 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4402 +++$+++ 4402 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.310689020E09 +++$+++ It's a completely unreliable source. There's no real news mentions of this actually happening.  +++$+++ :It's a completely unreliable source. There's no real news mentions of this actually happening. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 17:17, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

266547 +++$+++ Paul_Pigman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-16 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.174097040E09 +++$+++ However, I agree that finding a Wikiproject to work with would be good for me to help me focus. I'll think about where I'm drawn to for the next few days. Thanks for the suggestion. Best,  +++$+++ However, I agree that finding a Wikiproject to work with would be good for me to help me focus. I'll think about where I'm drawn to for the next few days. Thanks for the suggestion. Best, [[User:Paul_Pigman|'''<font color="green">Pig</font>'''<sup><font color="red">man</font></sup>]]<sub>[[User talk:Paul_Pigman|dialogue]]</sub> 19:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
266548 +++$+++ Paul_Pigman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266547 +++$+++ 266547 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.174101600E09 +++$+++ Oh, well, sure. I'll pop over to [[User:Salix alba]]'s talk page and see what's up. Although math is not my strong point, I'd be willing to give it a shot. As long as I don't have to verify the accuracy of equations above a simple algebraic level I think I could handle something like that. Thanks for the tip. -- +++$+++ :Oh, well, sure. I'll pop over to [[User:Salix alba]]'s talk page and see what's up. Although math is not my strong point, I'd be willing to give it a shot. As long as I don't have to verify the accuracy of equations above a simple algebraic level I think I could handle something like that. Thanks for the tip. --[[User:Paul_Pigman|'''<font color="green">Pig</font>'''<sup><font color="red">man</font></sup>]]<sub>[[User talk:Paul_Pigman|dialogue]]</sub> 20:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
266549 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266547 +++$+++ 266548 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.174107960E09 +++$+++ No it is not. A simple stone inscription from early 12th century. +++$+++ ::No it is not. A simple stone inscription from early 12th century.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
266550 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266547 +++$+++ 266548 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.174110360E09 +++$+++ No Idont unfortunately +++$+++ ::No Idont unfortunately[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
266551 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266547 +++$+++ 266548 +++$+++ 2007-03-17 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.174120980E09 +++$+++ User Sarvagnya has provided a link at the bottom of my user talk page which has the image of a virgal (herostone). So the one that I took (Doddagaddavalli inscription) which you enquired if it was a copper plate has stark similarity with the one sarvangya provided. So they are both Hero stones. +++$+++ ::User Sarvagnya has provided a link at the bottom of my user talk page which has the image of a virgal (herostone). So the one that I took (Doddagaddavalli inscription) which you enquired if it was a copper plate has stark similarity with the one sarvangya provided. So they are both Hero stones.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

4404 +++$+++ MultiCinemaxPak +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.310731380E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:MultiCinemaxPak|MultiCinemaxPak]] ([[User talk:MultiCinemaxPak|talk]]) 05:03, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
4405 +++$+++ Barek +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4404 +++$+++ 4404 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.310731560E09 +++$+++ {{tps}} Username changes can be requested following the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Changing username\/Simple]]. ---  +++$+++ :{{tps}} Username changes can be requested following the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple]]. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 05:06, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

525022 +++$+++ Laurap414 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-07 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.144476660E09 +++$+++ What do you think of [[Soiling]]?  You did some work on [[Encopresis]] so maybe you could weigh in?  I am relatively new and was trying to monitor new pages & found this one.  Also if you have any advice for how you would have approached the same article that would be appreciated!  Thanks,  +++$+++ What do you think of [[Soiling]]?  You did some work on [[Encopresis]] so maybe you could weigh in?  I am relatively new and was trying to monitor new pages & found this one.  Also if you have any advice for how you would have approached the same article that would be appreciated!  Thanks, [[User:Laurap414|laurap414]] 23:11, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
525023 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525022 +++$+++ 525022 +++$+++ 2006-04-13 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.144953840E09 +++$+++ It's not really a quality article, but there are some good diagrams there that could be recycled into [[Encopresis]] or [[Fecal incontinence]]. -- +++$+++ :It's not really a quality article, but there are some good diagrams there that could be recycled into [[Encopresis]] or [[Fecal incontinence]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 11:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

516785 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Oldelpaso +++$+++ 516785 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-26 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.201397340E09 +++$+++ Hey Oldelpaso, saw your PR request, I've added some comments.  Perhaps you'd return the favour should you see fit and have the time and check out [[Portman Road]].  It's currently at FAC looking all lonely and unloved for the past day or so.  Anything you see that's missing or whatever, let me know.  All the best...  +++$+++ Hey Oldelpaso, saw your PR request, I've added some comments.  Perhaps you'd return the favour should you see fit and have the time and check out [[Portman Road]].  It's currently at FAC looking all lonely and unloved for the past day or so.  Anything you see that's missing or whatever, let me know.  All the best... [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 17:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
516786 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Oldelpaso +++$+++ 516785 +++$+++ 516785 +++$+++ 2008-01-31 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.201797720E09 +++$+++ Hey, found your email languishing in my junk (thanks hotmail!) today, I'll respond later.  In the meantime, fancy getting your hands dirty at [[List of Ipswich Town F.C. statistics and records\u200e]]?  I'd really really like to get it into a state where it could be considered for featured status.  It's a tough one because it'd be a precedent for this type of thing (as far as I know) but I'm prepared to do the work...  +++$+++ :Hey, found your email languishing in my junk (thanks hotmail!) today, I'll respond later.  In the meantime, fancy getting your hands dirty at [[List of Ipswich Town F.C. statistics and records‎]]?  I'd really really like to get it into a state where it could be considered for featured status.  It's a tough one because it'd be a precedent for this type of thing (as far as I know) but I'm prepared to do the work... [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 08:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

4407 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-16 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.310871720E09 +++$+++ Here's something that may lend notability: it's a full member of the [[Arizona Interscholastic Association]] beginning this year (check: [http:\/\/www.aiaonline.org\/story\/uploads\/2011_2013_Conference_Placement_1307676189.pdf]). I've reverted the redirect and the COI revisions. The same user put in the same content as an IP. I'd suggest blocking the COI user instead of reverting. I've been working very hard in the last 8 months to bring AZ schools to a really high completion level, and AIA full members for a variety of reasons are high on the list.  +++$+++ Here's something that may lend notability: it's a full member of the [[Arizona Interscholastic Association]] beginning this year (check: [http://www.aiaonline.org/story/uploads/2011_2013_Conference_Placement_1307676189.pdf]). I've reverted the redirect and the COI revisions. The same user put in the same content as an IP. I'd suggest blocking the COI user instead of reverting. I've been working very hard in the last 8 months to bring AZ schools to a really high completion level, and AIA full members for a variety of reasons are high on the list. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 20:02, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
4408 +++$+++  +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4407 +++$+++ 4407 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310871900E09 +++$+++ P.S. I'm not affiliated with Imagine Schools \u2014 or, for that matter, any AZ school except [[Seton Catholic Preparatory High School|this one]]. 20:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ *P.S. I'm not affiliated with Imagine Schools — or, for that matter, any AZ school except [[Seton Catholic Preparatory High School|this one]]. 20:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

266552 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-17 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.174121520E09 +++$+++ Lookslike we have two images for Virgals. Ask sarvagnya where he got his image and which era\/kingdom it beloned to. If you plan to extend the [[Hero stone]] article, you need that info. All I know is mine came from the Hoysala era from Doddagaddavalli +++$+++ Lookslike we have two images for Virgals. Ask sarvagnya where he got his image and which era/kingdom it beloned to. If you plan to extend the [[Hero stone]] article, you need that info. All I know is mine came from the Hoysala era from Doddagaddavalli[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
266553 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266552 +++$+++ 266552 +++$+++ 2007-03-17 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.174130340E09 +++$+++ Hi Matisse, [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Sarvagnya '''here's'''] my wikicommons account.. and if you go there.. you should see a [http:\/\/tools.wikimedia.de\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/Gallery.php?wikifam=commons.wikimedia.org&img_user_text=Sarvagnya '''gallery tab'''] on that page.  There you'll find all my pics.  Watch that space.. I have some more coming up.  Cheers :)  [[:User_talk:Sarvagnya|Sarvagnya]] 04:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :Hi Matisse, [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Sarvagnya '''here's'''] my wikicommons account.. and if you go there.. you should see a [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~daniel/WikiSense/Gallery.php?wikifam=commons.wikimedia.org&img_user_text=Sarvagnya '''gallery tab'''] on that page.  There you'll find all my pics.  Watch that space.. I have some more coming up.  Cheers :)  [[:User_talk:Sarvagnya|Sarvagnya]] 04:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

4409 +++$+++ Danger +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-17 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.310967960E09 +++$+++ Hello MikeWazowski. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of [[:Moe Aung Yin]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax.'''  Thank you.   +++$+++ Hello MikeWazowski. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of [[:Moe Aung Yin]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax.'''  Thank you.  [[User:Danger|Danger]] ([[User talk:Danger|talk]]) 22:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
4410 +++$+++ Danger +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4409 +++$+++ 4409 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310969100E09 +++$+++ By the way, is your name a reference to [[Monsters, Inc.]]? Every time I see your username, a scene from that movie plays in my head and I laugh.  +++$+++ :By the way, is your name a reference to [[Monsters, Inc.]]? Every time I see your username, a scene from that movie plays in my head and I laugh. [[User:Danger|Danger]] ([[User talk:Danger|talk]]) 23:05, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
4411 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4409 +++$+++ 4410 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310969880E09 +++$+++ Yep - lost an eye when I was a kid, so ol' one-eyed Mike seemed appropriate.  +++$+++ ::Yep - lost an eye when I was a kid, so ol' one-eyed Mike seemed appropriate. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 23:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

266554 +++$+++ Tillman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-17 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.174187280E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Tillman|Pete Tillman]] 20:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
266555 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266554 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.174201560E09 +++$+++ Today was rough. work and 14\" of snow to deal with. Altekar covers administration, Government, Economy, Army and Revenue in 200 pages. This book is a real authority. Not funny!! I have condenced 30 pages of socal life into what you see taking only very important points. Tommorow Western Chalukyas will go for FAC. +++$+++ ::Today was rough. work and 14" of snow to deal with. Altekar covers administration, Government, Economy, Army and Revenue in 200 pages. This book is a real authority. Not funny!! I have condenced 30 pages of socal life into what you see taking only very important points. Tommorow Western Chalukyas will go for FAC.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

528699 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-15 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.174028160E09 +++$+++ Had a look at your fix to footnotes. I'm not used to that format, but it looks like all the cites are still in place, so I'm cool with it. BTW, have you seen the conflict on speed & date over the last steam record on the [[land speed record|LSR]] page? Got a source that might resolve it? (I don't...) ''Ciao''.   +++$+++ Had a look at your fix to footnotes. I'm not used to that format, but it looks like all the cites are still in place, so I'm cool with it. BTW, have you seen the conflict on speed & date over the last steam record on the [[land speed record|LSR]] page? Got a source that might resolve it? (I don't...) ''Ciao''.  [[User:Trekphiler|Trekphiler]] 23:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
528700 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528699 +++$+++ 528699 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.174032840E09 +++$+++ I have replied on the talk page for the Land Speed Record with three reliable sources.  +++$+++ :I have replied on the talk page for the Land Speed Record with three reliable sources. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 01:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

266556 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-18 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.174203300E09 +++$+++ Have to be careful. Historians have their prejudices too. Rahtrakutas of Manyakheta were Kannadigas. Soundara Rajan is  probably not. Ask him about the Cholas (whom the Rashtrakutas pulvarised) and he may go ga-ga. +++$+++ Have to be careful. Historians have their prejudices too. Rahtrakutas of Manyakheta were Kannadigas. Soundara Rajan is  probably not. Ask him about the Cholas (whom the Rashtrakutas pulvarised) and he may go ga-ga.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
266557 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266556 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.174204020E09 +++$+++ You have email. +++$+++ ::You have email.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
266558 +++$+++ Naveenbm +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266556 +++$+++ 266556 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.174271340E09 +++$+++ Hi, This history section of the bull gorowing is a popular legend and may be we should have it as such listing it under Trivia or popular legend sections of the article. Let me know your thoughts. --  +++$+++ : Hi, This history section of the bull gorowing is a popular legend and may be we should have it as such listing it under Trivia or popular legend sections of the article. Let me know your thoughts. -- [[User:Naveenbm|<font color="Blue"><b>Naveen</b></font>]] <sup><i>([[User_talk:Naveenbm|talk]])</i></sup> 19:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
266559 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266556 +++$+++ 266558 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.174277160E09 +++$+++ Your wish, my command +++$+++ ::Your wish, my command[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

528701 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-22 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.174595160E09 +++$+++ Re:[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FWJBscribe&diff=117020290&oldid=117017861]. You're quite right- that comment is thoughtlessly phrased. I'm sorry that it upset you- it wasn't my intention to do so, which is why my comment is made on the talkpage of another editor who expressed a delete opinion and not in the discussion. I would certainly not have expressed myself that way in discussion with you or in the AfD discussion itself. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ Re:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FWJBscribe&diff=117020290&oldid=117017861]. You're quite right- that comment is thoughtlessly phrased. I'm sorry that it upset you- it wasn't my intention to do so, which is why my comment is made on the talkpage of another editor who expressed a delete opinion and not in the discussion. I would certainly not have expressed myself that way in discussion with you or in the AfD discussion itself. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 13:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
528702 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528701 +++$+++ 528701 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.174596300E09 +++$+++ We're cool. Things happen in discussion. I appreciate the apology.  +++$+++ :We're cool. Things happen in discussion. I appreciate the apology. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 13:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

4414 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4414 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-18 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311034860E09 +++$+++ [[Conor Matthew Mccreedy]] is identified as a possible copyvio, but the \"source\" is a document uploaded to Commons. I'm not quite sure what's going on, but this isn't the usual copyvio situation. While I haven't used the print to pdf option, it looks like someone might have printed the WP page as a pdf, then uploaded it to Commons.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ [[Conor Matthew Mccreedy]] is identified as a possible copyvio, but the "source" is a document uploaded to Commons. I'm not quite sure what's going on, but this isn't the usual copyvio situation. While I haven't used the print to pdf option, it looks like someone might have printed the WP page as a pdf, then uploaded it to Commons.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 17:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
4415 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4414 +++$+++ 4414 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311042480E09 +++$+++ I think it's the other way around - the page creator has already identified himself on the article talk page as a COI editor acting on behalf of the subject of the article.  +++$+++ :I think it's the other way around - the page creator has already identified himself on the article talk page as a COI editor acting on behalf of the subject of the article. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 19:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
4416 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4414 +++$+++ 4415 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311209940E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks. I don't remember seeing that, but maybe I forgot to check. --<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::OK, thanks. I don't remember seeing that, but maybe I forgot to check. --<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 17:59, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

481333 +++$+++ Cyclone1 +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-01 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.175469240E09 +++$+++ Worst newsletter ever! I can't believe you would make a mockery of Coredesat like that by comparing him to a hurricane! Hurricanes kill people! I think I hate you... (April fools, that was the best newsletter I've ever read! ;) Keep it up!)  <span style=\"font-size:100%;\"><font color=\"darkblue\"> +++$+++ Worst newsletter ever! I can't believe you would make a mockery of Coredesat like that by comparing him to a hurricane! Hurricanes kill people! I think I hate you... (April fools, that was the best newsletter I've ever read! ;) Keep it up!)  <span style="font-size:100%;"><font color="darkblue">[[User:Cyclone1|'''''→Cycl''''']]</font></span><span style="font-size:110%;"><font color="steelblue">[[User talk:Cyclone1|'''''one1''''']]</font>'''''→'''''</span> 16:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
481334 +++$+++ AstroHurricane001 +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481333 +++$+++ 481333 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.175473620E09 +++$+++ Lol, what that a joke? I immediately figured there can't be a hurricane will because there never was one and the season hans't even started. Besides, all the cyclone links to wikipedia pages and all the user links to cyclone pages. Was the whole thing a joke, or is there a bit of true info in it? Also, you rarely ever give a letter on the firstday of month, is there another letter this month? Thanks. [[User:AstroHurricane001\/ASTRO|<font color=\"blue\">A<\/font>]][[User:AstroHurricane001|<font color=\"Purple\">stroHur<\/font>]][[WP:WPTC|<font color=\"Gray\">ricane<\/font>]][[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Dinosaurs|<font color=\"green\">00<\/font>]][[Comet McNaught|<font color=\"Red\">1<\/font>]]<sup>([[User_talk:AstroHurricane001|Talk]]+[[Special:Contributions\/AstroHurricane001|Contribs]]+ +++$+++ :Lol, what that a joke? I immediately figured there can't be a hurricane will because there never was one and the season hans't even started. Besides, all the cyclone links to wikipedia pages and all the user links to cyclone pages. Was the whole thing a joke, or is there a bit of true info in it? Also, you rarely ever give a letter on the firstday of month, is there another letter this month? Thanks. [[User:AstroHurricane001/ASTRO|<font color="blue">A</font>]][[User:AstroHurricane001|<font color="Purple">stroHur</font>]][[WP:WPTC|<font color="Gray">ricane</font>]][[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Dinosaurs|<font color="green">00</font>]][[Comet McNaught|<font color="Red">1</font>]]<sup>([[User_talk:AstroHurricane001|Talk]]+[[Special:Contributions/AstroHurricane001|Contribs]]+[[User:AstroHurricane001/Userboxes|Ubx]])</sup> 17:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
481335 +++$+++ AstroHurricane001 +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481333 +++$+++ 481333 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.175473800E09 +++$+++ BTW plz archive your page! It's long! Thanks! [[User:AstroHurricane001\/ASTRO|<font color=\"blue\">A<\/font>]][[User:AstroHurricane001|<font color=\"Purple\">stroHur<\/font>]][[WP:WPTC|<font color=\"Gray\">ricane<\/font>]][[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Dinosaurs|<font color=\"green\">00<\/font>]][[Comet McNaught|<font color=\"Red\">1<\/font>]]<sup>([[User_talk:AstroHurricane001|Talk]]+[[Special:Contributions\/AstroHurricane001|Contribs]]+ +++$+++ :BTW plz archive your page! It's long! Thanks! [[User:AstroHurricane001/ASTRO|<font color="blue">A</font>]][[User:AstroHurricane001|<font color="Purple">stroHur</font>]][[WP:WPTC|<font color="Gray">ricane</font>]][[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Dinosaurs|<font color="green">00</font>]][[Comet McNaught|<font color="Red">1</font>]]<sup>([[User_talk:AstroHurricane001|Talk]]+[[Special:Contributions/AstroHurricane001|Contribs]]+[[User:AstroHurricane001/Userboxes|Ubx]])</sup> 17:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

393952 +++$+++ Amorymeltzer +++$+++ RyanCross +++$+++ 393952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-16 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.245151800E09 +++$+++ Following a discussion on [[WT:POKE#Active_members|the Project's talk page]], we will be updating [[WP:POKE|WikiProject Pok\xe9mon's]] list of participants. To do this, all users previously listed as \"Active\" have been moved to the \"Inactive\" list; after this change anyone may add\/re-add their name to the \"Active\" participants list. As your name was one of those on the [[Wikipedia:POKE#Active|Active members]] list, I am notifying you in case your active interest remains. Thank you for your cooperation in our efforts to keep our list of active participants as accurate and up-to-date as possible. ~ <font color=\"#FF0099\">Amory<\/font><font color=\"#555555\"><small> ''( +++$+++ Following a discussion on [[WT:POKE#Active_members|the Project's talk page]], we will be updating [[WP:POKE|WikiProject Pokémon's]] list of participants. To do this, all users previously listed as "Active" have been moved to the "Inactive" list; after this change anyone may add/re-add their name to the "Active" participants list. As your name was one of those on the [[Wikipedia:POKE#Active|Active members]] list, I am notifying you in case your active interest remains. Thank you for your cooperation in our efforts to keep our list of active participants as accurate and up-to-date as possible. ~ <font color="#FF0099">Amory</font><font color="#555555"><small> ''([[User:Amorymeltzer|user]] • [[User talk:Amorymeltzer|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Amorymeltzer|contribs]])''</small></font> 04:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
393953 +++$+++  +++$+++ RyanCross +++$+++ 393952 +++$+++ 393952 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ All scores are accurate as of 22:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ *All scores are accurate as of 22:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
393954 +++$+++  +++$+++ RyanCross +++$+++ 393952 +++$+++ 393952 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ All scores are accurate as of 21:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ *All scores are accurate as of 21:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
393955 +++$+++  +++$+++ RyanCross +++$+++ 393952 +++$+++ 393952 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ All scores are accurate as of 16:17, 5 July 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ *All scores are accurate as of 16:17, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

4418 +++$+++ Ryan Vesey +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-18 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311052440E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Hi MikeWazowski. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]]. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for [[:Conor Matthew Mccreedy]], a page that you tagged for speedy deletion,  because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page.  Please take a moment to look at the [[WP:NPP|suggested tasks for patrollers]] and review the [[WP:CSD#Criteria|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Particularly, the section covering [[WP:CSD#Non-criteria|non-criteria]]. Such pages are best tagged with [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion]], [[WP:PRODBLP|proposed deletion for biographies of living persons]], or sent to the appropriate [[WP:Deletion discussions|deletion discussion]]. ''The article is not solely promotional and would not require a fundamental rewrite to become encyclopedic.  If notability is in question, take it to AFD.''  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Hi MikeWazowski. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]]. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for [[:Conor Matthew Mccreedy]], a page that you tagged for speedy deletion,  because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page.  Please take a moment to look at the [[WP:NPP|suggested tasks for patrollers]] and review the [[WP:CSD#Criteria|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Particularly, the section covering [[WP:CSD#Non-criteria|non-criteria]]. Such pages are best tagged with [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion]], [[WP:PRODBLP|proposed deletion for biographies of living persons]], or sent to the appropriate [[WP:Deletion discussions|deletion discussion]]. ''The article is not solely promotional and would not require a fundamental rewrite to become encyclopedic.  If notability is in question, take it to AFD.'' [[User:Ryan Vesey|'''''Ryan''''']] [[User talk:Ryan Vesey|'''''Vesey''''']] [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Vesey|<small>contribs</small>]] 22:14, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
4419 +++$+++ Ryan Vesey +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4418 +++$+++ 4418 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.311052560E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the template which appeared in this way.  I assumed it would have been similar to other Speedy deletion declined templates.  +++$+++ :Sorry for the template which appeared in this way.  I assumed it would have been similar to other Speedy deletion declined templates. [[User:Ryan Vesey|'''''Ryan''''']] [[User talk:Ryan Vesey|'''''Vesey''''']] [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Vesey|<small>contribs</small>]] 22:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
4420 +++$+++ Ryan Vesey +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4418 +++$+++ 4419 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311072720E09 +++$+++ In regards to the article, your tagging is a little excessive.  First, consider using {{t|Multiple issues}}.  Second, many of the issues you have tagged it with require discussion on the talk page yet you brought nothing up.  Finally, consider bringing the article to AFD if you think it is not notable instead of discouraging the editor by slamming the article with tags.  +++$+++ ::In regards to the article, your tagging is a little excessive.  First, consider using {{t|Multiple issues}}.  Second, many of the issues you have tagged it with require discussion on the talk page yet you brought nothing up.  Finally, consider bringing the article to AFD if you think it is not notable instead of discouraging the editor by slamming the article with tags. [[User:Ryan Vesey|'''''Ryan''''']] [[User talk:Ryan Vesey|'''''Vesey''''']] [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Vesey|<small>contribs</small>]] 03:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
4421 +++$+++ Ryan Vesey +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4418 +++$+++ 4420 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.311122220E09 +++$+++ You also added a copyright issue template on the page but did not follow any of the instructions for filing.  I went ahead and did it for you but in the future please follow all instructions.  +++$+++ :::You also added a copyright issue template on the page but did not follow any of the instructions for filing.  I went ahead and did it for you but in the future please follow all instructions. [[User:Ryan Vesey|'''''Ryan''''']] [[User talk:Ryan Vesey|'''''Vesey''''']] [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Vesey|<small>contribs</small>]] 17:37, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
4422 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4418 +++$+++ 4421 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311126720E09 +++$+++ In regards to your comment that I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Rusty69t&curid=32453481&diff=440350092&oldid=440345532 \"have it out for that article\"], it's not personal - however, I've noticed a pattern of promotion, copyright infringements, claims made that the citations do not back up, and dubious references from unreliable sources. Something seems *very* suspicious about that article.  +++$+++ ::::In regards to your comment that I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rusty69t&curid=32453481&diff=440350092&oldid=440345532 "have it out for that article"], it's not personal - however, I've noticed a pattern of promotion, copyright infringements, claims made that the citations do not back up, and dubious references from unreliable sources. Something seems *very* suspicious about that article. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 18:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
4423 +++$+++ Ryan Vesey +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4418 +++$+++ 4422 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311129540E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, the user brought the issue to [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard]].  Sorry for accusing you of \"having it out for the article\" but I found your repeated tagging with no attempt to improve the article or give information to the author counter productive.  +++$+++ :::::Just to let you know, the user brought the issue to [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard]].  Sorry for accusing you of "having it out for the article" but I found your repeated tagging with no attempt to improve the article or give information to the author counter productive. [[User:Ryan Vesey|'''''Ryan''''']] [[User talk:Ryan Vesey|'''''Vesey''''']] [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Vesey|<small>contribs</small>]] 19:39, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

528707 +++$+++ Retiono Virginian +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-22 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.174624320E09 +++$+++ A certain sock though. The first account was vandalising wincosin and other related articles. Please get someone to block the account immediatly.  +++$+++ A certain sock though. The first account was vandalising wincosin and other related articles. Please get someone to block the account immediatly. [[User:Retiono Virginian|Retiono Virginian]] 21:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
528708 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528707 +++$+++ 528707 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.174625760E09 +++$+++ Sorry. Will do immediately.  +++$+++ :Sorry. Will do immediately. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 21:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

266566 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-18 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.174285080E09 +++$+++ All the authors mentioned categorically called them \"RASHTRAKUTAS of MANYAKHETA\". modern name for MANYAKHETA is MALKHED. +++$+++ All the authors mentioned categorically called them "RASHTRAKUTAS of MANYAKHETA". modern name for MANYAKHETA is MALKHED.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
266567 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266566 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.174285320E09 +++$+++ After reading all these books it seems their capital may have been fluid from 753-814 when they may have had several moving capitals. This is what Dr. Jyotsna Kamat mentions too.But I dont think we need to make an issue of it. +++$+++ ::After reading all these books it seems their capital may have been fluid from 753-814 when they may have had several moving capitals. This is what Dr. Jyotsna Kamat mentions too.But I dont think we need to make an issue of it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

528712 +++$+++ Kncyu38 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528712 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-23 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.174704060E09 +++$+++ I posted a comment regarding your vote on WJBscribe's RfA. This is just a friendly suggestion for your consideration, but you may want to change to abstention. Your vote doesn't really change a thing and will only reflect badly on you. \u2014 +++$+++ I posted a comment regarding your vote on WJBscribe's RfA. This is just a friendly suggestion for your consideration, but you may want to change to abstention. Your vote doesn't really change a thing and will only reflect badly on you. —[[user:Kncyu38|KNcyu38]] ([[user talk:Kncyu38|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kncyu38|contribs]]) 19:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
528713 +++$+++ Luna Santin +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528712 +++$+++ 528712 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.174711980E09 +++$+++ For what it's worth, though, I admire the courage it takes to stand up and voice your opinion in the face of what looks to have been 80-something supports at the time. Wikipedia may not quite be a democracy, but the input of the community is truly important, and that's something I do respect. &ndash; <span style=\"font-family: Garamond\"> +++$+++ :For what it's worth, though, I admire the courage it takes to stand up and voice your opinion in the face of what looks to have been 80-something supports at the time. Wikipedia may not quite be a democracy, but the input of the community is truly important, and that's something I do respect. &ndash; <span style="font-family: Garamond">[[User:Luna Santin|<font color="#1E90FF">'''Luna Santin'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Luna Santin|talk]])</span> 21:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

266569 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266569 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.174289040E09 +++$+++ was \"dravidian\" (combination of various south Indian styles). It came as a shock to them that \"their\" architecture at Ellora was dravidian, as they went around flaunting themselves as \"Aryan\". I have seen real specimens on this article which has seen a fair share of vandalism as I mentioned earlier. None of them were really concerned with architecture, only the origin and to prove the Rashtrakutas did not patronise Kannada. Thank you for taking so much interest in these things. +++$+++ was "dravidian" (combination of various south Indian styles). It came as a shock to them that "their" architecture at Ellora was dravidian, as they went around flaunting themselves as "Aryan". I have seen real specimens on this article which has seen a fair share of vandalism as I mentioned earlier. None of them were really concerned with architecture, only the origin and to prove the Rashtrakutas did not patronise Kannada. Thank you for taking so much interest in these things.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
266570 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266569 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.174293300E09 +++$+++ Bharoch was their main shipping capital, Ellora their main architectural focus, Manyakheta the regal capital which Amoghavarsha tried to make as beautiful as the capital of Lord [[Indra]] in the heavens (Sastri) and so on. It is not very different from todays India. When people talk of Manufacturing they are invariably speaking of Gujarat, Bombay or Chennai. When they refer to High Technology, Bangalore leads the way and Delhi ofcourse is the Administrative capital.We just need to keep that in perspective. +++$+++ ::Bharoch was their main shipping capital, Ellora their main architectural focus, Manyakheta the regal capital which Amoghavarsha tried to make as beautiful as the capital of Lord [[Indra]] in the heavens (Sastri) and so on. It is not very different from todays India. When people talk of Manufacturing they are invariably speaking of Gujarat, Bombay or Chennai. When they refer to High Technology, Bangalore leads the way and Delhi ofcourse is the Administrative capital.We just need to keep that in perspective.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
266571 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266569 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.174293420E09 +++$+++ it will take me a copule of more days to complete the sections on Economy and Taxation. +++$+++ ::it will take me a copule of more days to complete the sections on Economy and Taxation.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

528714 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-23 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.174709400E09 +++$+++ You asked me for advice as to what I would do were I in your shoes. As far as the AfD noms are concerned- a large number of uninvolved editors will read the AfDs and concensus can change. Make sure the articles are sourced as well as possible with especial regard to the notability of the subject. As to your oppose comment in my RfA, I would certainly not wish you to withdraw it due to any pressure you have received- that is a matter totally individual to you. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ You asked me for advice as to what I would do were I in your shoes. As far as the AfD noms are concerned- a large number of uninvolved editors will read the AfDs and concensus can change. Make sure the articles are sourced as well as possible with especial regard to the notability of the subject. As to your oppose comment in my RfA, I would certainly not wish you to withdraw it due to any pressure you have received- that is a matter totally individual to you. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 21:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
528715 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528714 +++$+++ 528714 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.174811040E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Given the comments that were made, that can't have been easy. And that you decided not just to not oppose but to support as well means a lot. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Thank you. Given the comments that were made, that can't have been easy. And that you decided not just to not oppose but to support as well means a lot. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 01:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

4427 +++$+++  Lil-unique1 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311464040E09 +++$+++ I have undone your edit to [[Killer Love]] as it appears that you misunderstood the purpose of the credits section. In no way does it promote anyone or anything, rather it is to give credit to all those working on album bar the songwriters and producers. Hundreds of thousands of Single and Album pages including [[WP:Featured articles]] and [[WP:Good articles]] include them because the credits are an important part of the article. On of the criteria for quality status B and above is a conclusive overview of all aspects of an album including those who've worked with the singer. Albums cannot recieve this without including a credits section. In future do not remove such information (which is sourced) without prior discussion. Also if you are going to make such a drastic change I suggest you also discuss it first. &mdash;  +++$+++ I have undone your edit to [[Killer Love]] as it appears that you misunderstood the purpose of the credits section. In no way does it promote anyone or anything, rather it is to give credit to all those working on album bar the songwriters and producers. Hundreds of thousands of Single and Album pages including [[WP:Featured articles]] and [[WP:Good articles]] include them because the credits are an important part of the article. On of the criteria for quality status B and above is a conclusive overview of all aspects of an album including those who've worked with the singer. Albums cannot recieve this without including a credits section. In future do not remove such information (which is sourced) without prior discussion. Also if you are going to make such a drastic change I suggest you also discuss it first. &mdash; [[User:Lil-unique1|<font color="DarkRed">'''Lil_<font color="red">℧</font>niquℇ <font color="red">№</font>1</font>]] [[User talk: Lil-unique1|'''<font color="Black"><sup>[talk]</sup></font>''']] 16:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
4428 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4427 +++$+++ 4427 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.311466920E09 +++$+++ Actually, it does appear to do nothing more than promote individuals, and also be a direct copyvio from the album liner notes. It is not Wikipedia's place to \"give credit to all those working on album\" - they've already received their credit, on the album. Perhaps this needs to be looked at on the other albums, as it seems unnecessarily promotional to me - I've removed content like this many times in the past with nary a peep.  +++$+++ :Actually, it does appear to do nothing more than promote individuals, and also be a direct copyvio from the album liner notes. It is not Wikipedia's place to "give credit to all those working on album" - they've already received their credit, on the album. Perhaps this needs to be looked at on the other albums, as it seems unnecessarily promotional to me - I've removed content like this many times in the past with nary a peep. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 17:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

528716 +++$+++ Retiono Virginian +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528716 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-24 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.174789860E09 +++$+++ Why did you remove the sockpuppeteer tag on [[User:Fatwhales|Fatwhale's]] userpage?  +++$+++ Why did you remove the sockpuppeteer tag on [[User:Fatwhales|Fatwhale's]] userpage? [[User:Retiono Virginian|Retiono Virginian]] 19:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
528717 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528716 +++$+++ 528716 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.174804260E09 +++$+++ I was attempting to follow the suspected sockpuppet procedure. Please revert me if I was in error.  +++$+++ :I was attempting to follow the suspected sockpuppet procedure. Please revert me if I was in error. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 23:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
528718 +++$+++ TwinsMetsFan +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528716 +++$+++ 528716 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.174799640E09 +++$+++ <small>Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? &ndash; [[Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads\/Newsletter|It's all here.]] \u2014 +++$+++ :<small>Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? &ndash; [[Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter|It's all here.]] —[[User:TwinsMetsFan|'''<font color="#CC0018">T</font><font color="#0000C0">M</font>F''']] <sup>[[User talk:TwinsMetsFan|Let's Go Mets]] - [[Special:Contributions/TwinsMetsFan|Stats]]</sup> 22:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

266573 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.174364700E09 +++$+++ I intend to bring this to wikipedia. The Kuknur temples (9 temples in a cluster) are going to get my visit this year. I will look up more. Perhaps an FA article called \"Rashtrakuta art in Karnataka\" will be worth it. +++$+++ I intend to bring this to wikipedia. The Kuknur temples (9 temples in a cluster) are going to get my visit this year. I will look up more. Perhaps an FA article called "Rashtrakuta art in Karnataka" will be worth it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
266574 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266573 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.174376760E09 +++$+++ Western Chalukyas is in FAC, I have added fresh info to the last two paragraphs (per reviewer requirement)of the History section. A copy edit from you would be good.thanks +++$+++ ::Western Chalukyas is in FAC, I have added fresh info to the last two paragraphs (per reviewer requirement)of the History section. A copy edit from you would be good.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
266575 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266573 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.174377360E09 +++$+++ Yes, I am not good at general articles. Perhaps lack the motivation there. I dont understand \"probably because your attitudes are whatever that other guy called me\" +++$+++ ::Yes, I am not good at general articles. Perhaps lack the motivation there. I dont understand "probably because your attitudes are whatever that other guy called me"[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
266576 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266573 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.174379880E09 +++$+++ sorry. I thought you had given up for the day and was working on the LEAD. If you want to spend a few minutes on the history section, I will let you drive. +++$+++ ::sorry. I thought you had given up for the day and was working on the LEAD. If you want to spend a few minutes on the history section, I will let you drive.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
266577 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266573 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.174382940E09 +++$+++ I have expanded the lead for flow per reviewer. I had expanded the last 3 paras in History section. Please copy edit both changes. +++$+++ ::I have expanded the lead for flow per reviewer. I had expanded the last 3 paras in History section. Please copy edit both changes.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

4430 +++$+++ Bowser423 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311637980E09 +++$+++ I am genuinely trying to do something useful and helpful. Why are you attacking it?  +++$+++ I am genuinely trying to do something useful and helpful. Why are you attacking it? [[User:Bowser423|<font color="red" style="background:black">&nbsp;--Bowser the Storm Tracker&nbsp;</font>]] [[WP:LUZA|<font color="black" style="background:cyan;">Keeping the skies bright</font>]] <sup>[[User Talk:Bowser423|Chat Me Up]]</sup> 16:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
4431 +++$+++ Bowser423 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4430 +++$+++ 4430 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311638400E09 +++$+++ Are you genuinely so cold as to immediately try to delete a group for helping people?  +++$+++ :Are you genuinely so cold as to immediately try to delete a group for helping people? [[User:Bowser423|<font color="red" style="background:black">&nbsp;--Bowser the Storm Tracker&nbsp;</font>]] [[WP:LUZA|<font color="black" style="background:cyan;">Keeping the skies bright</font>]] <sup>[[User Talk:Bowser423|Chat Me Up]]</sup> 17:00, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
4432 +++$+++ Bowser423 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4430 +++$+++ 4431 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.311639060E09 +++$+++ PLEASE ANSWER ME! I want no trouble. Do I have to get on my knees and beg? please stop targeting Cieluza for deletion! please!  +++$+++ ::PLEASE ANSWER ME! I want no trouble. Do I have to get on my knees and beg? please stop targeting Cieluza for deletion! please! [[User:Bowser423|<font color="red" style="background:black">&nbsp;--Bowser the Storm Tracker&nbsp;</font>]] [[WP:LUZA|<font color="black" style="background:cyan;">Keeping the skies bright</font>]] <sup>[[User Talk:Bowser423|Chat Me Up]]</sup> 17:11, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
4433 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4430 +++$+++ 4432 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311639240E09 +++$+++ I only see you creating useless categories and pages. If you disagree, please make your case in the appropriate forums. I won;t be doing any actual deletions - that will be up to administrators to decide after the discussion ends. Also, please try to be [[WP:CIVIL|civil]] when communicating with others - calling people \"genuinely so cold\" ain't helping.  +++$+++ :::I only see you creating useless categories and pages. If you disagree, please make your case in the appropriate forums. I won;t be doing any actual deletions - that will be up to administrators to decide after the discussion ends. Also, please try to be [[WP:CIVIL|civil]] when communicating with others - calling people "genuinely so cold" ain't helping. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 17:14, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
4434 +++$+++ Bowser423 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4430 +++$+++ 4433 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311639660E09 +++$+++ You have not answered my question. WHY????? Why won't you give my group a chance?  +++$+++ ::::You have not answered my question. WHY????? Why won't you give my group a chance? [[User:Bowser423|<font color="red" style="background:black">&nbsp;--Bowser the Storm Tracker&nbsp;</font>]] [[WP:LUZA|<font color="black" style="background:cyan;">Keeping the skies bright</font>]] <sup>[[User Talk:Bowser423|Chat Me Up]]</sup> 17:21, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
4435 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4430 +++$+++ 4434 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311639840E09 +++$+++ What part of me answering your question did you not read? Please stop posting these pleas on my talk page, and make your case for inclusion, if you have one, on the appropriate discussion pages.  +++$+++ :::::What part of me answering your question did you not read? Please stop posting these pleas on my talk page, and make your case for inclusion, if you have one, on the appropriate discussion pages. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 17:24, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

528720 +++$+++ Master_son +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-30 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.175316960E09 +++$+++ I was confronted by another user (see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Master_son#Highway photos my talk page]) about \"poor quality photos\" being on Wikipedia articles - and also there seems to be a consensus against photo galleries in [[WP:USRD]].  Just to let you know about it.  An optimal solution to this would be to move the images to Wikimedia Commons, then apply {{tl|Commons}} or {{tl|Commonscat}}.  The CC sharealike license is allowed in Commons so I don't see any problem - but they will have to be transwikied over.  If any questions, let me know thanks --  +++$+++ I was confronted by another user (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Master_son#Highway photos my talk page]) about "poor quality photos" being on Wikipedia articles - and also there seems to be a consensus against photo galleries in [[WP:USRD]].  Just to let you know about it.  An optimal solution to this would be to move the images to Wikimedia Commons, then apply {{tl|Commons}} or {{tl|Commonscat}}.  The CC sharealike license is allowed in Commons so I don't see any problem - but they will have to be transwikied over.  If any questions, let me know thanks -- [[User:Master_son|<span style="font-variant: small-caps; color:#006600!important"><strong>master_son</strong></span>]][[User_talk:Master_son|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps; color: #aca607!important;"><em>Talk</em></sup>]]<sup style="font-variant: small-caps; color: #aca607!important;"> - </sup> [[Special:Contributions/Master_son|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps; color: #aca607!important;"><em>Edits</em></sup>]] 21:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
528721 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528720 +++$+++ 528720 +++$+++ 2007-03-31 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.175369820E09 +++$+++ Ouch! I found their discussion, and the discussion appears to be over. There are close to 100 images that would need to be reuploaded, which would take many DAYS. I wish that I could get help from someone with a super lightning fast internet connection.  +++$+++ :Ouch! I found their discussion, and the discussion appears to be over. There are close to 100 images that would need to be reuploaded, which would take many DAYS. I wish that I could get help from someone with a super lightning fast internet connection. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 12:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
528722 +++$+++ Master_son +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528720 +++$+++ 528721 +++$+++ 2007-04-02 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.175512560E09 +++$+++ I'll help out where I can over the next few days - I have a copy of the Commonist app.  I'll make sure to maintain the same license and credit you as the source. --  +++$+++ ::I'll help out where I can over the next few days - I have a copy of the Commonist app.  I'll make sure to maintain the same license and credit you as the source. -- [[User:Master_son|<span style="font-variant: small-caps; color:#006600!important"><strong>master_son</strong></span>]][[User_talk:Master_son|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps; color: #aca607!important;"><em>Talk</em></sup>]]<sup style="font-variant: small-caps; color: #aca607!important;"> - </sup> [[Special:Contributions/Master_son|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps; color: #aca607!important;"><em>Edits</em></sup>]] 04:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
528723 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528720 +++$+++ 528722 +++$+++ 2007-04-02 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.175545260E09 +++$+++ Please add any images that I took to the Commons category [[Commons:Category:Files by User:Royalbroil from en.wikipedia]]. Also add them to [[:Category:Cities in Wisconsin]] if appropriate. My class schedule prevents me from doing much Wikipedia in the first half of the week.  +++$+++ :::Please add any images that I took to the Commons category [[Commons:Category:Files by User:Royalbroil from en.wikipedia]]. Also add them to [[:Category:Cities in Wisconsin]] if appropriate. My class schedule prevents me from doing much Wikipedia in the first half of the week. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;<font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:Royalbroil|T]]</font>&nbsp;:&nbsp;<font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Royalbroil|C]]</font></sup> 13:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

266579 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-20 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.174426620E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> -- +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --[[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 14:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
266580 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266579 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.174450860E09 +++$+++ The western chalukyas were cousins of the eastern ones. Not too many writers write on eastern chalukyas because they first of all started out as a Badami chalukya republic (feudatory if you would like) and remained so for for some time, then becase a Pallava feudatory and then again a Badami chalukya feudatory. Then came under the Rashtrakutas, gaining independence briefly from 850-950. Then again they were constantly siding with the western chalukyas and cholas finally getting absorbed into the chola domains by marraige in 1000 time whence historians call them [[Chalukya Cholas]]. So their 600 year rule , like the Western Ganga Dynasty of Southern Karnataka was patchy, except the Gangas build world famous monuments at Shravanabelagola. +++$+++ ::The western chalukyas were cousins of the eastern ones. Not too many writers write on eastern chalukyas because they first of all started out as a Badami chalukya republic (feudatory if you would like) and remained so for for some time, then becase a Pallava feudatory and then again a Badami chalukya feudatory. Then came under the Rashtrakutas, gaining independence briefly from 850-950. Then again they were constantly siding with the western chalukyas and cholas finally getting absorbed into the chola domains by marraige in 1000 time whence historians call them [[Chalukya Cholas]]. So their 600 year rule , like the Western Ganga Dynasty of Southern Karnataka was patchy, except the Gangas build world famous monuments at Shravanabelagola.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
266581 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266579 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.174463280E09 +++$+++ Did you have an opportunity to copy edit the Lead and History (bottom 3 paras) in western chalukyas? +++$+++ ::Did you have an opportunity to copy edit the Lead and History (bottom 3 paras) in western chalukyas?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

4436 +++$+++ Frankgorshin +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311663900E09 +++$+++ I've noticed that you've been deleting many of my edits.  My recent contributions to articles have been part of an effort to improve coverage of regional theatre, particularly in the region of Pittsburgh, and I don't understand why you've removed most of my contributions.  Although the original productions of plays are the most important information to be included in articles, I believe that because regional theatre is an important cultural force in keeping theatre alive, subsequent regional productions should be listed as much as possible.  Please consult with me before you undo more of my edits.  I would be happy to discuss with you what should be considered notable in the world of regional theatre, but I would prefer if we could come to an agreement about this before you undo all of my work.  I don't mean to sound combative at all, but since I have invested considerable time and energy into contributing a great deal of information on theatre to Wikipedia, I would like to have a discussion before more of my contributions are removed.  Thank you!  +++$+++ I've noticed that you've been deleting many of my edits.  My recent contributions to articles have been part of an effort to improve coverage of regional theatre, particularly in the region of Pittsburgh, and I don't understand why you've removed most of my contributions.  Although the original productions of plays are the most important information to be included in articles, I believe that because regional theatre is an important cultural force in keeping theatre alive, subsequent regional productions should be listed as much as possible.  Please consult with me before you undo more of my edits.  I would be happy to discuss with you what should be considered notable in the world of regional theatre, but I would prefer if we could come to an agreement about this before you undo all of my work.  I don't mean to sound combative at all, but since I have invested considerable time and energy into contributing a great deal of information on theatre to Wikipedia, I would like to have a discussion before more of my contributions are removed.  Thank you! [[User:Frankgorshin|Frankgorshin]] ([[User talk:Frankgorshin|talk]]) 00:05, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
4437 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4436 +++$+++ 4436 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311664740E09 +++$+++ I think you may need to take a look at the fact that other editors (I'm not the only one) have removed your additions of regional Pittsburgh productions because they simply aren't notable - TheaterXYZ put on a version of a famous play? Not notable. TheaterXYZ put on a show that got significant coverage for something specific? Maybe. Your mass additions of nothing but local productions from a few minor theaters looked like spam, and not only to me.  +++$+++ :I think you may need to take a look at the fact that other editors (I'm not the only one) have removed your additions of regional Pittsburgh productions because they simply aren't notable - TheaterXYZ put on a version of a famous play? Not notable. TheaterXYZ put on a show that got significant coverage for something specific? Maybe. Your mass additions of nothing but local productions from a few minor theaters looked like spam, and not only to me. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 00:19, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

266583 +++$+++ Refsworldlee +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.174515840E09 +++$+++ Hi. Could you please explain your interpretation of the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] as regards the above article, as I always use [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Dates_containing_a_month_and_a_day|'''this''']] guideline, and it appears to say that month and day should ''almost always'' be linked to allow user preferred format to appear? The provisos say nothing about birthdates or dates of death in a biography not being linked, and if you could point me to where it does, I will not revert your recent changes. If you cannot convince me of your correctness in this, I feel bound to return the article to its former state. You might also pop into the article [[Talk:Hoagy Carmichael|'''talk page''']] to clarify things for others. Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. Could you please explain your interpretation of the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] as regards the above article, as I always use [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Dates_containing_a_month_and_a_day|'''this''']] guideline, and it appears to say that month and day should ''almost always'' be linked to allow user preferred format to appear? The provisos say nothing about birthdates or dates of death in a biography not being linked, and if you could point me to where it does, I will not revert your recent changes. If you cannot convince me of your correctness in this, I feel bound to return the article to its former state. You might also pop into the article [[Talk:Hoagy Carmichael|'''talk page''']] to clarify things for others. Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks. [[User:Refsworldlee|Refsworldlee]]<sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew-fat)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(eds)</small>]] 15:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
266584 +++$+++ Refsworldlee +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266583 +++$+++ 266583 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.174523040E09 +++$+++ I really do think I must revert [[Hoagy Carmichael]] unless you reply with a hard, set guideline for me to read. I have tried to find what you are referring to, albeit rather vaguely, but cannot. If you would do this, I would obviously apply the rule in the future myself. Thanks.  +++$+++ :I really do think I must revert [[Hoagy Carmichael]] unless you reply with a hard, set guideline for me to read. I have tried to find what you are referring to, albeit rather vaguely, but cannot. If you would do this, I would obviously apply the rule in the future myself. Thanks. [[User:Refsworldlee|Refsworldlee]]<sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew-fat)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(eds)</small>]] 17:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
266585 +++$+++ Refsworldlee +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266583 +++$+++ 266584 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.174523340E09 +++$+++ So it appears to approve of date preferences - and you are removing that wholesale. Can you now see my point? I would ask you to hold fire with any further de-linking in articles until we\/you get total clarification from someone. I will contact an admin I know to get an opinion. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::So it appears to approve of date preferences - and you are removing that wholesale. Can you now see my point? I would ask you to hold fire with any further de-linking in articles until we/you get total clarification from someone. I will contact an admin I know to get an opinion. Thanks. [[User:Refsworldlee|Refsworldlee]]<sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew-fat)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(eds)</small>]] 17:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
266586 +++$+++ Refsworldlee +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266583 +++$+++ 266585 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.174524480E09 +++$+++ But the day-month-year combination is not a single-value reference - the multi-facet is what makes the preference work, and you are removing the preference! I prefer to ask [[User:Chrislk02|Chris Kreider]] if that's okay. I would ask that you wait, but please go ahead with your third opinion, as I would be interested to hear why genuine user preferences formatting should ever be torpedoed in Wikipedia. Cheers.  +++$+++ :::But the day-month-year combination is not a single-value reference - the multi-facet is what makes the preference work, and you are removing the preference! I prefer to ask [[User:Chrislk02|Chris Kreider]] if that's okay. I would ask that you wait, but please go ahead with your third opinion, as I would be interested to hear why genuine user preferences formatting should ever be torpedoed in Wikipedia. Cheers. [[User:Refsworldlee|Refsworldlee]]<sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew-fat)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(eds)</small>]] 17:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
266587 +++$+++ Refsworldlee +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266583 +++$+++ 266586 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.174525320E09 +++$+++ Why have you now reverted [[Hoagy Carmichael|Hoagy]], without waiting for a second, third, fourth opinion or whatever? Can I just make sure I am not being taken for a ride here? I would appreciate your response.  +++$+++ ::::Why have you now reverted [[Hoagy Carmichael|Hoagy]], without waiting for a second, third, fourth opinion or whatever? Can I just make sure I am not being taken for a ride here? I would appreciate your response. [[User:Refsworldlee|Refsworldlee]]<sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew-fat)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(eds)</small>]] 18:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
266588 +++$+++ Refsworldlee +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.174525560E09 +++$+++ Ouch! Why the sour response? Play the game, please. An article's an article. We can all improve them by investing time, whether it's our 'bag' or not.  +++$+++ ::::::Ouch! Why the sour response? Play the game, please. An article's an article. We can all improve them by investing time, whether it's our 'bag' or not. [[User:Refsworldlee|Refsworldlee]]<sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew-fat)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(eds)</small>]] 18:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

525028 +++$+++ The Man13 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525028 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-18 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.145349600E09 +++$+++ Keep it up on the cavities work! :)  +++$+++ Keep it up on the cavities work! :) [[User:The Man13|Vint]] 01:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
525029 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525028 +++$+++ 525028 +++$+++ 2006-04-18 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.145349660E09 +++$+++ Thank you! -- +++$+++ :Thank you! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:41, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

568719 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-26 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.156602600E09 +++$+++ Would you like the contents of the above article moved to a user sub-page in order for the categorisation project to go ahead? <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Would you like the contents of the above article moved to a user sub-page in order for the categorisation project to go ahead? <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''&nbsp;&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]] </span> 07:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
568720 +++$+++ Green451 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568719 +++$+++ 568719 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.156633800E09 +++$+++ Thank you for asking me.  Yes, that would be great if you could move the page to my userspace so I can create a category.  Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thank you for asking me.  Yes, that would be great if you could move the page to my userspace so I can create a category.  Thanks. [[User:Green451|Green451]] 16:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

4444 +++$+++ Favonian +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-30 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.312087140E09 +++$+++ Hi Mike.  Regarding {{diff2|442259227|this revert}}, you might want to re-read [[WP:REMOVE]].  It is only while the block is active that the user is barred from removing declined unblock requests.  +++$+++ Hi Mike.  Regarding {{diff2|442259227|this revert}}, you might want to re-read [[WP:REMOVE]].  It is only while the block is active that the user is barred from removing declined unblock requests. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 21:39, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
4445 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4444 +++$+++ 4444 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312087500E09 +++$+++ My bad, then - although it's amazing how two restorations became [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:AKnight2B&diff=442260426&oldid=442259227 six] in his mind.  +++$+++ :My bad, then - although it's amazing how two restorations became [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AKnight2B&diff=442260426&oldid=442259227 six] in his mind. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 21:45, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
4446 +++$+++ Favonian +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4444 +++$+++ 4445 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.312087680E09 +++$+++ Just one of several problems with that editor.  Right now he is engaged in \"admin shopping\".  +++$+++ ::Just one of several problems with that editor.  Right now he is engaged in "admin shopping". [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 21:48, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

266590 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.174526880E09 +++$+++ Sincerely,   +++$+++ Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 18:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
266591 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266590 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.174534560E09 +++$+++ I need to make a small correction. Dont want you to lose your edits. +++$+++ ::I need to make a small correction. Dont want you to lose your edits.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
266592 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266590 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.174534800E09 +++$+++ Just answered it on the article. +++$+++ ::Just answered it on the article.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
266593 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266590 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.174541400E09 +++$+++ Yes, for sometime now I have been thinking of giving a brief account of the various styles of Kannada literature such as Champu, Ragale, sangatya, Tripadi, Shatpadi etc (With the exception of Champu all others are unique to Kannada). To create a stub page with even 8 lines of info I need a better reference book than the ones I have now which usually just write a line or two about it. +++$+++ ::Yes, for sometime now I have been thinking of giving a brief account of the various styles of Kannada literature such as Champu, Ragale, sangatya, Tripadi, Shatpadi etc (With the exception of Champu all others are unique to Kannada). To create a stub page with even 8 lines of info I need a better reference book than the ones I have now which usually just write a line or two about it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

4448 +++$+++ Michig +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4448 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.312156380E09 +++$+++ I've declined speedy deletion here. Firstly, the band released four albums on [[Dischord Records]], one of the most important US hadrcore\/post-hardcore labels. Secondly, the band evolved into [[Girls Against Boys]]. These within the article make this totally unsuitable for speedy deletion via A7. If you search for sources on the band, there's plenty out there, including several Google Books results.-- +++$+++ I've declined speedy deletion here. Firstly, the band released four albums on [[Dischord Records]], one of the most important US hadrcore/post-hardcore labels. Secondly, the band evolved into [[Girls Against Boys]]. These within the article make this totally unsuitable for speedy deletion via A7. If you search for sources on the band, there's plenty out there, including several Google Books results.--[[User:Michig|Michig]] ([[User talk:Michig|talk]]) 16:53, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
4449 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4448 +++$+++ 4448 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312176960E09 +++$+++ The entire article reads like someone trying to make the case that the person is notable. It reads like a press release, which is advertising, in my opionion.  +++$+++ :The entire article reads like someone trying to make the case that the person is notable. It reads like a press release, which is advertising, in my opionion. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 22:36, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
4450 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4448 +++$+++ 4448 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312176960E09 +++$+++ It has been addressed by you, but not been discussed - it is just you stating your opinion as if it were Holy Writ. You do not get to decide the notability of the person you created the article about - that is for the community to decide.  +++$+++ :It has been addressed by you, but not been discussed - it is just you stating your opinion as if it were Holy Writ. You do not get to decide the notability of the person you created the article about - that is for the community to decide. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 22:36, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
4451 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4448 +++$+++ 4448 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312176960E09 +++$+++ This is not what the template is about - every reference is to something written by Sacks, which is a primary reference as far as Wikipedia is concerned. This tag is accurate.  +++$+++ :This is not what the template is about - every reference is to something written by Sacks, which is a primary reference as far as Wikipedia is concerned. This tag is accurate. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 22:36, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
4452 +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ MikeWazowski +++$+++ 4448 +++$+++ 4448 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.312177080E09 +++$+++ Again, not a one of the references are from independent publications discussing Sacks, but to articles written by Sacks - therefor this tag was also accurate and placed correctly. +++$+++ :Again, not a one of the references are from independent publications discussing Sacks, but to articles written by Sacks - therefor this tag was also accurate and placed correctly.[[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski#top|talk]]) 22:38, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

528737 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-24 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.177429920E09 +++$+++ When you're prodding an article can you put the reason right in the prod. It saves time. Thanks.  +++$+++ When you're prodding an article can you put the reason right in the prod. It saves time. Thanks. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 08:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
528738 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528737 +++$+++ 528737 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.177439700E09 +++$+++ Sorry. It was discussed at WikiProject Contemporary Christian Music.  +++$+++ :Sorry. It was discussed at WikiProject Contemporary Christian Music. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 11:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

266594 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266594 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.174541760E09 +++$+++ the major trends in Kannada literature (champu, ragale ...), major and landmark writings, most famous epic poets etc. +++$+++ the major trends in Kannada literature (champu, ragale ...), major and landmark writings, most famous epic poets etc.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
266595 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266594 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.174544460E09 +++$+++ I have started the Economy section. If you need to do copy edits, let me know and I will log off. +++$+++ ::I have started the Economy section. If you need to do copy edits, let me know and I will log off.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:21, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
266596 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266594 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.174545780E09 +++$+++ yes. you have mail. +++$+++ ::yes. you have mail.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

528739 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-27 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.177702680E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, I can't seem to find [[:Image:I43atU.S.151Sign.jpg|this image]] on Commons - is there a typo in the title? Cheers, &ndash;  +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, I can't seem to find [[:Image:I43atU.S.151Sign.jpg|this image]] on Commons - is there a typo in the title? Cheers, &ndash; [[User:Riana|Riana]] <sub>[[User talk:Riana|<font color="seagreen">''ऋ''</font>]]</sub> 12:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
528740 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528739 +++$+++ 528739 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.177708860E09 +++$+++ Same goes for [[:Image:WisconsinHighway57atWisconsinHighway96.jpg|this one]]. &ndash;  +++$+++ :Same goes for [[:Image:WisconsinHighway57atWisconsinHighway96.jpg|this one]]. &ndash; [[User:Riana|Riana]] <sub>[[User talk:Riana|<font color="seagreen">''ऋ''</font>]]</sub> 14:21, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
528741 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528739 +++$+++ 528740 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.177712640E09 +++$+++ Somehow the upload process removed the periods in the first image. I linked the first file to the correct Wikimedia Commons file. It looks like you got the second one.  +++$+++ ::Somehow the upload process removed the periods in the first image. I linked the first file to the correct Wikimedia Commons file. It looks like you got the second one. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 15:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
528742 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528739 +++$+++ 528741 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.177712820E09 +++$+++ Hey, I didn't get the second one - JPD did - and I still can't find it on Commons. [[commons:Image:WisconsinHighway57atWisconsinHighway96.jpg]] &ndash;  +++$+++ :::Hey, I didn't get the second one - JPD did - and I still can't find it on Commons. [[commons:Image:WisconsinHighway57atWisconsinHighway96.jpg]] &ndash; [[User:Riana|Riana]] <sub>[[User talk:Riana|<font color="seagreen">''ऋ''</font>]]</sub> 15:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
528743 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528739 +++$+++ 528742 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.177712880E09 +++$+++ [[commons:Image:WisconsinHighway57atWisconsinHighway96a.jpg]] I don't remember why the name got changed. Sorry.  +++$+++ ::::[[commons:Image:WisconsinHighway57atWisconsinHighway96a.jpg]] I don't remember why the name got changed. Sorry. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 15:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
528744 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528739 +++$+++ 528743 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.177712940E09 +++$+++ That's fine! Thanks for the update :) &ndash;  +++$+++ :::::That's fine! Thanks for the update :) &ndash; [[User:Riana|Riana]] <sub>[[User talk:Riana|<font color="seagreen">''ऋ''</font>]]</sub> 15:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

262886 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262886 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-04 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.207340580E09 +++$+++ I presume you're aiming at FA level for [[Ketogenic diet]]. The graphs already in the article are prime candidates for SVG magic, especially since you had the sense to provide the data values! (thank you :) As for your image ideas, they seem excellent candidates\u2014I'd particularly like to see a ketogenic meal as the lead image (I'm thinking something along the lines of [[:Image:Salad platter.jpg]]).  +++$+++ I presume you're aiming at FA level for [[Ketogenic diet]]. The graphs already in the article are prime candidates for SVG magic, especially since you had the sense to provide the data values! (thank you :) As for your image ideas, they seem excellent candidates—I'd particularly like to see a ketogenic meal as the lead image (I'm thinking something along the lines of [[:Image:Salad platter.jpg]]). [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 13:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
262887 +++$+++ Ragesoss +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262886 +++$+++ 262886 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.207366620E09 +++$+++ Probably the best place to go for help with retouching and editing images is the [[Wikipedia:Graphic Lab\/Images to improve|Graphics Lab]], where skilled people are usually pretty quick with things like converting graphics into SVG format and retouching pictures.  As for advice for taking better\/more lively pictures, maybe try taking shots that include both the container and the contents for the products, laid on in a context in which they would be used (for example, preparing a meal with KetCal, or performing a test with Ketostix).  I'll try to take a look at the history section in the next couple days.-- +++$+++ :Probably the best place to go for help with retouching and editing images is the [[Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Images to improve|Graphics Lab]], where skilled people are usually pretty quick with things like converting graphics into SVG format and retouching pictures.  As for advice for taking better/more lively pictures, maybe try taking shots that include both the container and the contents for the products, laid on in a context in which they would be used (for example, preparing a meal with KetCal, or performing a test with Ketostix).  I'll try to take a look at the history section in the next couple days.--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 20:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

266599 +++$+++ Camptown +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-22 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.174596180E09 +++$+++ The article '''''[[Indian copper plate inscriptions]]''''' was indeed featured on the Main page on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3ADid_you_know&diff=116986356&oldid=116936838 March 22 01.58 - 08.15] (Wikipedia Time). -- +++$+++ The article '''''[[Indian copper plate inscriptions]]''''' was indeed featured on the Main page on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3ADid_you_know&diff=116986356&oldid=116936838 March 22 01.58 - 08.15] (Wikipedia Time). --[[User:Camptown|Camptown]] 13:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
266600 +++$+++ Camptown +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266599 +++$+++ 266599 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.174603620E09 +++$+++ Trust me, it appeared on the Front page for 6 hours and 17 minutes - It's the last entry on the 01.58 revision, so when you were notified, the article had already been on the front page for more than 4 hours. -- +++$+++ :Trust me, it appeared on the Front page for 6 hours and 17 minutes - It's the last entry on the 01.58 revision, so when you were notified, the article had already been on the front page for more than 4 hours. --[[User:Camptown|Camptown]] 15:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

266601 +++$+++ Howcheng +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-22 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.174608480E09 +++$+++ I'm leaving the notice right after having updated the Main Page this time. :) --<span style=\"font-family:Verdana; \">''' +++$+++ I'm leaving the notice right after having updated the Main Page this time. :) --<span style="font-family:Verdana; ">'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C;">howcheng</span>]]'''  <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 17:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
266602 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266601 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.174618440E09 +++$+++ I just saw the title edit in Rashtrakuta page. The first two words in LEAD should be Rashtrakuta dynasty (many offshoots of this family ruled between 6-13th century) not Rashtrakutas of Manyakheta who ruled from 8-10 century. In the second paragraph I slide into Rashtrakutas of Manyakheta, the topic of interest. This is similar to Chalukya dynasty +++$+++ ::I just saw the title edit in Rashtrakuta page. The first two words in LEAD should be Rashtrakuta dynasty (many offshoots of this family ruled between 6-13th century) not Rashtrakutas of Manyakheta who ruled from 8-10 century. In the second paragraph I slide into Rashtrakutas of Manyakheta, the topic of interest. This is similar to Chalukya dynasty[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
266603 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266601 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.174619040E09 +++$+++ Yes. This needs correction. The article needs to be called \"Rashtrakuta dynasty\". The title will carry the same highlighted name in the first line. The template and map box will relate to Rashtrakutas of Manyakheta as they are the subject under study. This is exactly how the [[Chalukya dynasty]] page was made FA. Once I complete the sections on Economy, touch upon administration, Army etc, I will create subarticle stubs for lesser known \"later\" Rashtrakuta families and link it. Not much is known about the 6-7th centuries Rashtrakutas as explained in the article History section. Go ahead and request for an article name change keeping a redirect from Rashtrakuta to Rashtrakuta dynasty.thanks +++$+++ ::Yes. This needs correction. The article needs to be called "Rashtrakuta dynasty". The title will carry the same highlighted name in the first line. The template and map box will relate to Rashtrakutas of Manyakheta as they are the subject under study. This is exactly how the [[Chalukya dynasty]] page was made FA. Once I complete the sections on Economy, touch upon administration, Army etc, I will create subarticle stubs for lesser known "later" Rashtrakuta families and link it. Not much is known about the 6-7th centuries Rashtrakutas as explained in the article History section. Go ahead and request for an article name change keeping a redirect from Rashtrakuta to Rashtrakuta dynasty.thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
266604 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266601 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.174622820E09 +++$+++ I am going to rename the article now. Dont loose your edits.let me know when you are ready +++$+++ ::I am going to rename the article now. Dont loose your edits.let me know when you are ready[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

528747 +++$+++ Radon360 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-01 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.178070300E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Radon360|Radon360]] 18:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
528748 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528747 +++$+++ 528747 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.178092140E09 +++$+++ You're probably right, so I changed the caption on the image. Thanks for bringing it to my attention!  +++$+++ :You're probably right, so I changed the caption on the image. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 00:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

4461 +++$+++ The-Pope +++$+++ LunarLander +++$+++ 4461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-25 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.306359540E09 +++$+++ Hi there, over in the AFL world we've started [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3AFremantle_Dockers_current_squad&action=historysubmit&diff=430844258&oldid=428091803 switching over] from a fairly basic and boring NFL team squad based table to the much prettier Rls template.  The one thing that I would like to add, but aren't sure how, is the view\/discuss\/edit links to enable quick editing of the template.  It used to be done by the <nowiki>{{navbar|PAGENAME|plain=1|nodiv=1}}<\/nowiki> template.   Any idea how to add it, maybe only if navbar=yes is set or similar.  I don't know enough about template syntax to do it myself. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi there, over in the AFL world we've started [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AFremantle_Dockers_current_squad&action=historysubmit&diff=430844258&oldid=428091803 switching over] from a fairly basic and boring NFL team squad based table to the much prettier Rls template.  The one thing that I would like to add, but aren't sure how, is the view/discuss/edit links to enable quick editing of the template.  It used to be done by the <nowiki>{{navbar|PAGENAME|plain=1|nodiv=1}}</nowiki> template.   Any idea how to add it, maybe only if navbar=yes is set or similar.  I don't know enough about template syntax to do it myself. Thanks, [[User:The-Pope|The-Pope]] ([[User talk:The-Pope|talk]]) 14:39, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
4462 +++$+++ LunarLander +++$+++ LunarLander +++$+++ 4461 +++$+++ 4461 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.306393800E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've updated the template. There is now a ''templatename'' field that can link ''view talk edit'' to the template you're using. If the template has been added straight to a page the ''templatename'' field can be left unused and only ''edit'' will show. Clicking it will open that page for editing. ''''' +++$+++ :Hi, I've updated the template. There is now a ''templatename'' field that can link ''view talk edit'' to the template you're using. If the template has been added straight to a page the ''templatename'' field can be left unused and only ''edit'' will show. Clicking it will open that page for editing. '''''[[User:LunarLander|<font style="color:#999;background:#FFFFFF">LunarLander</font>]]''''' <font color="#CC6600">//</font> ''[[User talk:LunarLander|<font style="color:#999;background:#FFFFFF">talk</font>]]'' <font color="#CC6600">//</font> 00:10, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
4463 +++$+++ The-Pope +++$+++ LunarLander +++$+++ 4461 +++$+++ 4462 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.306427280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that - I've removed the \"edit\" from appearing by default, mainly because if it's transcluded, then the wrong page is editted, and if it isn't transcluded, then the normal edit tag at the top of the page or at each section break will work as per normal.  The only time you need a quicklink is if it is a template being transcluded.  Thanks again for doing it so quickly.  Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Thanks for that - I've removed the "edit" from appearing by default, mainly because if it's transcluded, then the wrong page is editted, and if it isn't transcluded, then the normal edit tag at the top of the page or at each section break will work as per normal.  The only time you need a quicklink is if it is a template being transcluded.  Thanks again for doing it so quickly.  Cheers, [[User:The-Pope|The-Pope]] ([[User talk:The-Pope|talk]]) 09:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

4464 +++$+++ Ginger Warrior +++$+++ LunarLander +++$+++ 4464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.310451900E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | [[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]]'s Chrome browser would forever be spitting out [[Template:Infobox rugby league biography|double-lined infoboxes]], had you not come up with [[Template:nowrap|the solution]] in the nick of time. Less than 24 hours after you made it, the protected edit request was passed. Well played! <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #74068f; font-family=fantasy\"> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | [[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]]'s Chrome browser would forever be spitting out [[Template:Infobox rugby league biography|double-lined infoboxes]], had you not come up with [[Template:nowrap|the solution]] in the nick of time. Less than 24 hours after you made it, the protected edit request was passed. Well played! <small><span style="border:1px solid #74068f; font-family=fantasy">[[User:Ginger Warrior|<font style="color:#74068f; background:black">GW</font>]][[User talk:Ginger Warrior|<font style="color:white; background:#74068f">(talk)</font>]]</span></small> 23:25, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
4465 +++$+++ LunarLander +++$+++ LunarLander +++$+++ 4464 +++$+++ 4464 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.310453640E09 +++$+++ Cheers mate! ''''' +++$+++ :Cheers mate! '''''[[User:LunarLander|<font style="color:#999;background:#FFFFFF">LunarLander</font>]]''''' <font color="#CC6600">//</font> ''[[User talk:LunarLander|<font style="color:#999;background:#FFFFFF">talk</font>]]'' <font color="#CC6600">//</font> 23:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

266611 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-23 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.174635300E09 +++$+++ You could copy edit the Lead and History (last 3 paras) of western chalukyas which I made additions to if you are not too fried. +++$+++ You could copy edit the Lead and History (last 3 paras) of western chalukyas which I made additions to if you are not too fried.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
266612 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266611 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.174635420E09 +++$+++ Either +++$+++ ::Either[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

4468 +++$+++ Omnireso +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-06 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.296984180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Omnireso|Omnireso]] ([[User talk:Omnireso|talk]]) 01:23, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
4469 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4468 +++$+++ 4468 +++$+++ 2011-02-06 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.296986280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 01:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

266613 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266613 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-23 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.174638000E09 +++$+++ ...that under the [[Western Chalukyas]] dynasty ruling [[South India]] between the 10th and 12th centuries, arts and crafts were organised into powerful, independent guilds, and work was done on a corporate basis. (nom)  +++$+++ ...that under the [[Western Chalukyas]] dynasty ruling [[South India]] between the 10th and 12th centuries, arts and crafts were organised into powerful, independent guilds, and work was done on a corporate basis. (nom) [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 01:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
266614 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266613 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.174638660E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid, this is not eligible for [[WP:DYK|DYK]], because neither of these articles are created or significantly expanded in last 5 days. It is one of the most important DYK requirements, to be get featured. - 01:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ ::I'm afraid, this is not eligible for [[WP:DYK|DYK]], because neither of these articles are created or significantly expanded in last 5 days. It is one of the most important DYK requirements, to be get featured. - 01:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
266615 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266613 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.174638960E09 +++$+++ Normally topics that are FA material like Western Chalukyas would not be accepted for DYK as their edits are made over several weeks. +++$+++ ::Normally topics that are FA material like Western Chalukyas would not be accepted for DYK as their edits are made over several weeks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
266616 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266613 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.174640160E09 +++$+++ I was generally asking since you got 4 out this week. +++$+++ ::I was generally asking since you got 4 out this week.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

4470 +++$+++ Omnireso +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-10 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.297396440E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Omnireso|Omnireso]] ([[User talk:Omnireso|talk]]) 19:54, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
4471 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4470 +++$+++ 4470 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.297400880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 21:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

262889 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-10 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.207893480E09 +++$+++ Hello again, I was wondering if you would mind monitoring the discussion for the FLRC for [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates\/List of Arsenal F.C. players|List of Arsenal F.C. players]] and closing it in about a week. The discussion has been very heated and the result will likely be controversial, so I wanted someone who has been neutral and has a lot of knowledge of the FLC process to close it. Most of the other FLC regulars have been involved in it, so would you be willing to do it? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hello again, I was wondering if you would mind monitoring the discussion for the FLRC for [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Arsenal F.C. players|List of Arsenal F.C. players]] and closing it in about a week. The discussion has been very heated and the result will likely be controversial, so I wanted someone who has been neutral and has a lot of knowledge of the FLC process to close it. Most of the other FLC regulars have been involved in it, so would you be willing to do it? Thanks, [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 22:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
262890 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262889 +++$+++ 262889 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.208203080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for commenting, but I had wanted you to close it, and I don't think you can do that now. As for the List of the 100 wealthiest people, as much as I hate ignoring your comments, I think I am going to pass it (in a few hours) because although I agree that the extra references are unnecessary, it still passes the FLC criteria on referencing. If you still believe that they should be removed, then you should bring it up on the article talk page. --  +++$+++ :Thanks for commenting, but I had wanted you to close it, and I don't think you can do that now. As for the List of the 100 wealthiest people, as much as I hate ignoring your comments, I think I am going to pass it (in a few hours) because although I agree that the extra references are unnecessary, it still passes the FLC criteria on referencing. If you still believe that they should be removed, then you should bring it up on the article talk page. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 12:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
262891 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262889 +++$+++ 262890 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.208239740E09 +++$+++ Somebody has gone ahead and nominated the 2007 for [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates\/List of billionaires (2007)|removal]]. --  +++$+++ ::Somebody has gone ahead and nominated the 2007 for [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of billionaires (2007)|removal]]. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 23:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

4472 +++$+++ Omnireso +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4472 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-15 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.297828680E09 +++$+++ Back on the topic, for a last go as it seems to me that this could last ages. How could I have proof ? What kind of proof is requested ? This is simply my opinion, as a past musician in that band. Regards.  +++$+++ Back on the topic, for a last go as it seems to me that this could last ages. How could I have proof ? What kind of proof is requested ? This is simply my opinion, as a past musician in that band. Regards. [[User:Omnireso|Omnireso]] ([[User talk:Omnireso|talk]]) 19:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
4473 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4472 +++$+++ 4472 +++$+++ 2011-02-16 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.297844760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 00:26, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

266617 +++$+++ Refsworldlee +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-23 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.174640940E09 +++$+++ And I'm ''always'' interested in quality article editing, though I have no sense of elitism where that's concerned.  +++$+++ And I'm ''always'' interested in quality article editing, though I have no sense of elitism where that's concerned. [[User:Refsworldlee|Refsworldlee]]<sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew-fat)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(eds)</small>]] 02:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
266618 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266617 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.174641120E09 +++$+++ We have both had a long day. +++$+++ ::We have both had a long day.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

4474 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4474 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-08 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.297208040E09 +++$+++ ...look [http:\/\/sciencefocus.com\/blog\/who-edits-wikipedia-articles here].....    +++$+++ ...look [http://sciencefocus.com/blog/who-edits-wikipedia-articles here].....   [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 15:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
4475 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4474 +++$+++ 4474 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.297209480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 15:58, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

266619 +++$+++ Wafulz +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-23 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.174643100E09 +++$+++ What's [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=117197255&oldid=117196737 this] about? -- +++$+++ What's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=117197255&oldid=117196737 this] about? --[[User:Wafulz|Wafulz]] 02:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
266620 +++$+++ Wafulz +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266619 +++$+++ 266619 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.174643760E09 +++$+++ Just so you know, reports are automatically removed once a user is blocked. If the user was not blocked, then it might have been removed accidentally. -- +++$+++ :Just so you know, reports are automatically removed once a user is blocked. If the user was not blocked, then it might have been removed accidentally. --[[User:Wafulz|Wafulz]] 02:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

4476 +++$+++ Victuallers +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4476 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-08 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.297233480E09 +++$+++ Pleased to. Poke me if I havnt done it in 24 hours  +++$+++ Pleased to. Poke me if I havnt done it in 24 hours [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 22:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
4477 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4476 +++$+++ 4476 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.297234980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 23:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
4478 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4476 +++$+++ 4477 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.297243560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 01:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
4479 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4476 +++$+++ 4478 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.297321620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for executing the DYK nomination.  Much appreciated. -  +++$+++ :::Thanks for executing the DYK nomination.  Much appreciated. - [[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 23:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
4480 +++$+++ Victuallers +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4476 +++$+++ 4479 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.297735020E09 +++$+++ Your welcome, the name Victuallers is intended to suggest bon -homie - please send beer in post. Note you will still need to review someone olses hook on the page to make your DYK acceptable. See nearby hooks to yours.   +++$+++ ::::Your welcome, the name Victuallers is intended to suggest bon -homie - please send beer in post. Note you will still need to review someone olses hook on the page to make your DYK acceptable. See nearby hooks to yours.  [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 17:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

266621 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-23 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.174713720E09 +++$+++ Perhaps he can help.Let me make some edits tonight and see what happens. +++$+++ Perhaps he can help.Let me make some edits tonight and see what happens.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
266622 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266621 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.174714260E09 +++$+++ Western chalukyas is proposed to rename to Western Chalukya Empire. All is quite so far. only two reviewers. +++$+++ ::Western chalukyas is proposed to rename to Western Chalukya Empire. All is quite so far. only two reviewers.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
266623 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266621 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.174719660E09 +++$+++ Rashtrakuta-->I will start some edits to Economy section now. Is that ok. +++$+++ ::Rashtrakuta-->I will start some edits to Economy section now. Is that ok.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
266624 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266621 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.174729800E09 +++$+++ Rashtrakuta-->I have completed the ECONOMY section. By mistake I did a copy edit of the sections you had already copy edited, but later reverted, so your copy edits are preserved. Only the last three paras are new and need copy editing now. +++$+++ ::Rashtrakuta-->I have completed the ECONOMY section. By mistake I did a copy edit of the sections you had already copy edited, but later reverted, so your copy edits are preserved. Only the last three paras are new and need copy editing now.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
266625 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266621 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.174774260E09 +++$+++ How do you access the pump? +++$+++ ::How do you access the pump?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
266626 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266621 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.174775760E09 +++$+++ KNM took care of the problem. These guys are good.!! +++$+++ ::KNM took care of the problem. These guys are good.!![[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

528768 +++$+++ Jusjih +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528768 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-19 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.179561480E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user={{PAGENAMEE}}}} this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags\/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 00:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Image source -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user={{PAGENAMEE}}}} this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 00:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Image source --> [[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 00:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
528769 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528768 +++$+++ 528768 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.179580140E09 +++$+++ I specifically asked to not be contact me for every flphoto as I indicated on the discussion for deletion of the license. There are people working on either clearing this up or deleting the photos.  +++$+++ :I specifically asked to not be contact me for every flphoto as I indicated on the discussion for deletion of the license. There are people working on either clearing this up or deleting the photos. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 06:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

4482 +++$+++ Jeepday +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-10 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.297389180E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{tlc|proposed deletion\/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:JeepdaySock|JeepdaySock]] <small>(AKA, [[User talk:Jeepday|Jeepday]])</small> 17:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
4483 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4482 +++$+++ 4482 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.297391820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 18:37, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

528771 +++$+++ Noles1984 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528771 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-20 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.179694920E09 +++$+++ Do you know what license is used for the Florida Photographic Collection? [[User:Jusjih]] seems bent on eraticating images and I've put a lot of time and effort into getting images appropiate for articles I create and edit. I maintain that those who run across photos, remove the image info and replace it with a deletion notice should replace it with the so-called correct license tag. I don't feel like spending hours retagging photos that are completely legal.  +++$+++ Do you know what license is used for the Florida Photographic Collection? [[User:Jusjih]] seems bent on eraticating images and I've put a lot of time and effort into getting images appropiate for articles I create and edit. I maintain that those who run across photos, remove the image info and replace it with a deletion notice should replace it with the so-called correct license tag. I don't feel like spending hours retagging photos that are completely legal. [[User:Noles1984|Noles1984]] 14:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
528772 +++$+++ Noles1984 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528771 +++$+++ 528771 +++$+++ 2007-05-20 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.179696000E09 +++$+++ I'm inserting (fairuse) tags hoping and I think is the correct tag. +++$+++ :I'm inserting (fairuse) tags hoping and I think is the correct tag.[[User:Noles1984|Noles1984]] 14:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

4484 +++$+++ Robman94 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-17 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.298008680E09 +++$+++ Hi Derek, do you any info on Iain's birthdate in your files?  Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Derek, do you any info on Iain's birthdate in your files?  Thanks. [[User:Robman94|Robman94]] ([[User talk:Robman94|talk]]) 21:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
4485 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4484 +++$+++ 4484 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.298019000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 00:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

4486 +++$+++ AllyD +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-21 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.298341260E09 +++$+++ I noticed you added this to some biographies (Lyttleton etc). As they don't feature in the Navbox (nor do any other musicians), I don't see it as adding anything to assist the page user? I tend to remove this Navbox from biographical articles when I see it. Happy to discuss this approach at [[:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jazz]] though, if you feel strongly about it.  +++$+++ I noticed you added this to some biographies (Lyttleton etc). As they don't feature in the Navbox (nor do any other musicians), I don't see it as adding anything to assist the page user? I tend to remove this Navbox from biographical articles when I see it. Happy to discuss this approach at [[:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jazz]] though, if you feel strongly about it. [[User:AllyD|AllyD]] ([[User talk:AllyD|talk]]) 18:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
4487 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4486 +++$+++ 4486 +++$+++ 2011-02-21 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.298352900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 21:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

4488 +++$+++ Memphisto +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-22 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.298407620E09 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2011 (UTC)\"  +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2011 (UTC)" [[User talk:Memphisto|memphisto]] 12:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
4489 +++$+++ Robman94 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4488 +++$+++ 4488 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.298592840E09 +++$+++ I'm guessing that somebody had hacked the template that Derek used, though I can't find evidence of that.  I doubt that this was Derek's actual comment.  +++$+++ :I'm guessing that somebody had hacked the template that Derek used, though I can't find evidence of that.  I doubt that this was Derek's actual comment. [[User:Robman94|Robman94]] ([[User talk:Robman94|talk]]) 16:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

266633 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-26 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.174895700E09 +++$+++ Then we can evaluate. +++$+++ Then we can evaluate.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
266634 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266633 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.174896060E09 +++$+++ If I did not trust you, I may not have asked you:) +++$+++ ::If I did not trust you, I may not have asked you:)[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
266635 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266633 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.174901100E09 +++$+++ Thats a start. we need to reduce Economy such that its total length is only upto what is currently citation#75 or worst case #79. (in total length I mean). Society can be as long as what is citation#119 currently, whcih means just compression wont do. +++$+++ ::Thats a start. we need to reduce Economy such that its total length is only upto what is currently citation#75 or worst case #79. (in total length I mean). Society can be as long as what is citation#119 currently, whcih means just compression wont do.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

4490 +++$+++ Acabashi +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-24 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.298552400E09 +++$+++ \u2013 we are both quizzical about this. I thought I would ask you, as music expert, if you could add an opinion, or perhaps information, about this exotic genre. Hope you are well.  +++$+++ – we are both quizzical about this. I thought I would ask you, as music expert, if you could add an opinion, or perhaps information, about this exotic genre. Hope you are well. [[User:Acabashi|Acabashi]] ([[User talk:Acabashi|talk]]) 05:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
4491 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4490 +++$+++ 4490 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.298584620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 13:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

528779 +++$+++ Purgatorio +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528779 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.180659660E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thanks again for your cooperation.  +++$+++ If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thanks again for your cooperation. [[User:Purgatorio|Purgatorio]] 18:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
528780 +++$+++ Purgatorio +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528779 +++$+++ 528779 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.180669080E09 +++$+++ Apologies - the image simply showed up when I ran through some random images and unfortunately it isn't one of the ones that is clearly public domain. Most of the images do seem to have been better catered for now in terms of replacement tags. Would it be wise to remove the defunct <nowiki>{{Template:Flphoto}}<\/nowiki> from those which have a replacement tag, so that the small number of dregs can be more readily identified using Whatlinkshere? There are only around 200 images to work through so I am quite happy to do that.  +++$+++ :Apologies - the image simply showed up when I ran through some random images and unfortunately it isn't one of the ones that is clearly public domain. Most of the images do seem to have been better catered for now in terms of replacement tags. Would it be wise to remove the defunct <nowiki>{{Template:Flphoto}}</nowiki> from those which have a replacement tag, so that the small number of dregs can be more readily identified using Whatlinkshere? There are only around 200 images to work through so I am quite happy to do that. [[User:Purgatorio|Purgatorio]] 20:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

4492 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-24 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.298575860E09 +++$+++ Anything you can add [[The Flee-Rekkers|here]]?  I've given up nominating my own articles for DYK, but would be happy to nominate any of yours if you like.  <small>(Hint, hint...)<\/small>  :-)   +++$+++ Anything you can add [[The Flee-Rekkers|here]]?  I've given up nominating my own articles for DYK, but would be happy to nominate any of yours if you like.  <small>(Hint, hint...)</small>  :-)  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 11:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
4493 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4492 +++$+++ 4492 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.298587320E09 +++$+++ Hiya. I added a reference and minor tweaks, but am struggling for a 'hook' - any thoughts ? -  +++$+++ :Hiya. I added a reference and minor tweaks, but am struggling for a 'hook' - any thoughts ? - [[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 14:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
4494 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4492 +++$+++ 4493 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.298593380E09 +++$+++ I'll get back to it in a day or so, and put a discography in as well.  Regards,  +++$+++ ::I'll get back to it in a day or so, and put a discography in as well.  Regards, [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 16:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
4495 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4492 +++$+++ 4494 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.298918100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 10:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
4496 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4492 +++$+++ 4495 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.298918640E09 +++$+++ No, don't bother, thanks - I've given up caring about DYK now.   +++$+++ ::::No, don't bother, thanks - I've given up caring about DYK now.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 10:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

528782 +++$+++ MER-C +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528782 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-04 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.180979160E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale --> [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 10:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
528783 +++$+++ Barno +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528782 +++$+++ 528782 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.181028300E09 +++$+++ I have added new sources directly covering this topic at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Andretti Curse]].  I invite you to review them and consider whether they might change your opinion on deleting the article.  (Sorry for not doing more on Mario's article; I was out of town for a week, then spent under an hour on Wikipedia for a week.)  +++$+++ *I have added new sources directly covering this topic at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andretti Curse]].  I invite you to review them and consider whether they might change your opinion on deleting the article.  (Sorry for not doing more on Mario's article; I was out of town for a week, then spent under an hour on Wikipedia for a week.) [[User:Barno|Barno]] 00:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

266639 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-27 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.174988880E09 +++$+++ in remote places in Karnataka(and really ancient towns known more locally than nationaly like [[Banavasi]], Talagunda) it unlikely we will find any in wiki. For Gangas there should be a few images from Shravanabelagola, I saw a few on your user page. I received a complimentary email from one Nikhil Verma (not from Karnataka) who is currently working in Banglaore. He said he loves architecture and travels for it. He was impressed with the [[Balligavi]] and [[Kambadahalli]] pages. I will ask him for images. +++$+++ in remote places in Karnataka(and really ancient towns known more locally than nationaly like [[Banavasi]], Talagunda) it unlikely we will find any in wiki. For Gangas there should be a few images from Shravanabelagola, I saw a few on your user page. I received a complimentary email from one Nikhil Verma (not from Karnataka) who is currently working in Banglaore. He said he loves architecture and travels for it. He was impressed with the [[Balligavi]] and [[Kambadahalli]] pages. I will ask him for images.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
266640 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266639 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.174989060E09 +++$+++ BTW, Rashtrakuta society and Economy looks good now. I will complete Language and expand on Administration tommorow and day after. +++$+++ ::BTW, Rashtrakuta society and Economy looks good now. I will complete Language and expand on Administration tommorow and day after.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

266641 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266641 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-27 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.175048040E09 +++$+++ To [[White Springs, Florida|White Springs]] and [[Welaka, Florida|Welaka]], that is. I was doing them for the [[WP:NRHP|NRHP]] Wikiproject, but I guess they could be used as well for the cities. I didn't add any to Fort Cooper 'cause... I think I forgot. Thanks again! :) -- +++$+++ To [[White Springs, Florida|White Springs]] and [[Welaka, Florida|Welaka]], that is. I was doing them for the [[WP:NRHP|NRHP]] Wikiproject, but I guess they could be used as well for the cities. I didn't add any to Fort Cooper 'cause... I think I forgot. Thanks again! :) --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 19:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
266642 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266641 +++$+++ 266641 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.175048820E09 +++$+++ Hey, there's bucketloads more where that came from. See [[Commons:Category:Registered Historic Places in Florida]]. I'm trying to get pics of every site in Florida, and there's folks in other parts of the state helping, so it ain't just me. I keep track of what's left to do [[User:Ebyabe\/NRHPs in FL pix needed|here]]. Have fun! -- +++$+++ :Hey, there's bucketloads more where that came from. See [[Commons:Category:Registered Historic Places in Florida]]. I'm trying to get pics of every site in Florida, and there's folks in other parts of the state helping, so it ain't just me. I keep track of what's left to do [[User:Ebyabe/NRHPs in FL pix needed|here]]. Have fun! --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 19:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
266643 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266641 +++$+++ 266642 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.175049540E09 +++$+++ The search function isn't always that great on the commons. That's why I categorize the hell out of any pics I add. You'll see what I mean if you go to the category I mentioned above. I even subsectioned it by county, and in some cases city. Thanks for reminding me of something, btw. I did a major reorg of my galleries, and I don't think I put the userpage category at the bottom of all the new pages. Oh well, something else to do. If you need any advice on using the commons though, drop me a line, and I can share what meager bits I've managed to gather. Cheerio! -- +++$+++ ::The search function isn't always that great on the commons. That's why I categorize the hell out of any pics I add. You'll see what I mean if you go to the category I mentioned above. I even subsectioned it by county, and in some cases city. Thanks for reminding me of something, btw. I did a major reorg of my galleries, and I don't think I put the userpage category at the bottom of all the new pages. Oh well, something else to do. If you need any advice on using the commons though, drop me a line, and I can share what meager bits I've managed to gather. Cheerio! --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 19:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
266644 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266641 +++$+++ 266643 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.175050740E09 +++$+++ Click on the \"Commons\" link above; it should take you right there. -- +++$+++ :::Click on the "Commons" link above; it should take you right there. --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 19:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
266645 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266641 +++$+++ 266642 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.175074740E09 +++$+++ Rashtrakuta-->I have added a section for Language. please take a look. As and when I find new info, I will add it. +++$+++ ::Rashtrakuta-->I have added a section for Language. please take a look. As and when I find new info, I will add it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

4499 +++$+++ Tomaca +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-03 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.299190560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Tomaca|Tomaca]] ([[User talk:Tomaca|talk]]) 14:16, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
4500 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4499 +++$+++ 4499 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.299194280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 15:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

4501 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4501 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-05 10:42:00 +++$+++ 1.299350520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments.  If you want an example of how one interested (some would say obsessed) editor can \"improve\" an article (or at least massively expand it), compare [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Solomon_Burke&oldid=393081402 this] with [[Solomon Burke|this]].  I've no idea what the content of the article is like now, as it's far too long for any sane person to read, but at least it shows an effort to improve WP.  Don't know about you, but I've noticed a big, big reduction in the numbers of editors who make solid improvements to music articles over the past couple of years - most of the music projects of which I'm a nominal member seem to be almost moribund, and I can count the number of regular reliable music editors on one or two hands.  One of the reasons I've \"come off\" DYK is actually that it prioritises new articles which often aren't needed, at the expense of measures to improve existing articles - not necessarily through the GA\/FA processes with which I've not been involved, but just generally.  By the by, I've noticed (but haven't said anything before) that you do a lot of \"tagging\" of articles.  That's fine, but it does often occur to me that, often, you and I are among the best placed people to actually improve those articles, with sources and considered edits.  I don't really want to give myself, or you, more work, but have you noticed any ''particular'' articles - of important musicians - who we (or I) should target for improvements in the way of biography, discography, etc.?  For instance, I had a go at [[Duane Eddy]] a while ago (and got a helpful email from his wife in return!!), and it didn't take very long to add big chunks of his biography and a discography into the article.  Thoughts welcome.  Anyway, good to hear from you.  Regards,  +++$+++ Thanks for your comments.  If you want an example of how one interested (some would say obsessed) editor can "improve" an article (or at least massively expand it), compare [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solomon_Burke&oldid=393081402 this] with [[Solomon Burke|this]].  I've no idea what the content of the article is like now, as it's far too long for any sane person to read, but at least it shows an effort to improve WP.  Don't know about you, but I've noticed a big, big reduction in the numbers of editors who make solid improvements to music articles over the past couple of years - most of the music projects of which I'm a nominal member seem to be almost moribund, and I can count the number of regular reliable music editors on one or two hands.  One of the reasons I've "come off" DYK is actually that it prioritises new articles which often aren't needed, at the expense of measures to improve existing articles - not necessarily through the GA/FA processes with which I've not been involved, but just generally.  By the by, I've noticed (but haven't said anything before) that you do a lot of "tagging" of articles.  That's fine, but it does often occur to me that, often, you and I are among the best placed people to actually improve those articles, with sources and considered edits.  I don't really want to give myself, or you, more work, but have you noticed any ''particular'' articles - of important musicians - who we (or I) should target for improvements in the way of biography, discography, etc.?  For instance, I had a go at [[Duane Eddy]] a while ago (and got a helpful email from his wife in return!!), and it didn't take very long to add big chunks of his biography and a discography into the article.  Thoughts welcome.  Anyway, good to hear from you.  Regards, [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 10:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
4502 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4501 +++$+++ 4501 +++$+++ 2011-03-05 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.299362160E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 13:56, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
4503 +++$+++ Arjayay +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4501 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-05 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.299368580E09 +++$+++ Sorry Derek, I couldn't resist.  +++$+++ :::Sorry Derek, I couldn't resist. [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 15:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

266647 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-28 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.175131320E09 +++$+++ Many kingdoms were created by Kannada dynasties in various parts of India. This is why Kamath calls it age of \"imperial Karnataka\". In addition devotional movements such as Virashaivaism later came from here. +++$+++ Many kingdoms were created by Kannada dynasties in various parts of India. This is why Kamath calls it age of "imperial Karnataka". In addition devotional movements such as Virashaivaism later came from here.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
266648 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.175161980E09 +++$+++ Haven't done much today actually. +++$+++ ::Haven't done much today actually.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
266649 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.175163120E09 +++$+++ I actually started off on a new article that we discussed earlier this day. Than stopped half way. And was just surfing around. Now time to hit the hay.Bye +++$+++ ::I actually started off on a new article that we discussed earlier this day. Than stopped half way. And was just surfing around. Now time to hit the hay.Bye[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

4504 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4504 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-05 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.299385620E09 +++$+++ Tee hee. Actually, do you think I should not place a tag (or two) on [[Solarstone|this]] ? -  +++$+++ Tee hee. Actually, do you think I should not place a tag (or two) on [[Solarstone|this]] ? - [[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 20:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
4505 +++$+++ Arjayay +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4504 +++$+++ 4504 +++$+++ 2011-03-06 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.299455220E09 +++$+++ I can't see anything wrong with that article ;-)  +++$+++ :I can't see anything wrong with that article ;-) [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 15:47, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
4506 +++$+++ Arjayay +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4504 +++$+++ 4505 +++$+++ 2011-03-06 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.299455220E09 +++$+++ Well nothing requiring removal:- other than '''some bold text''', SOME CAPITALS, and some wonderful, beautiful, fantastic, self promoting, peacock phrases.  +++$+++ ::Well nothing requiring removal:- other than '''some bold text''', SOME CAPITALS, and some wonderful, beautiful, fantastic, self promoting, peacock phrases. [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 15:47, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
4507 +++$+++ Arjayay +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4504 +++$+++ 4506 +++$+++ 2011-03-06 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.299455220E09 +++$+++ Despite the sarcasm, [[Solarstone]] makes my point actually. You have explained on the edit page what the problem is.  Far too many tags are added that automatically refer to the talk page, but the editor adding the tag has not said anything on the talk page, leaving later editors to guess what was causing particular offence. IMHO tags that refer to the talk page should automatically open the talk page when they are saved, to remind {force?) the tagger to explain what they mean.  +++$+++ :::Despite the sarcasm, [[Solarstone]] makes my point actually. You have explained on the edit page what the problem is.  Far too many tags are added that automatically refer to the talk page, but the editor adding the tag has not said anything on the talk page, leaving later editors to guess what was causing particular offence. IMHO tags that refer to the talk page should automatically open the talk page when they are saved, to remind {force?) the tagger to explain what they mean. [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 15:47, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
4508 +++$+++ Acabashi +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4504 +++$+++ 4507 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.300409700E09 +++$+++ Has nobody else spotted this, or am I just barking up the right tree ? It's wonderfully helpful sometimes when an editor leaves a useful link to a probable copy vio - saves us a lot of work: [http:\/\/www.solarstone.co.uk\/about solarstone]. The [http:\/\/whois.domaintools.com\/solarstone.co.uk dom name] was taken out in 2004; the article started in 2005. It could be that the article and the web site bumph was \"developed\" side by side, but even this has to be some kind infringement doesn't it ? As the site doesn't say thats it's a mirror, I think we have to assume it's copyright - I shall tag as such and see what happens - wish me luck.  +++$+++ ::::Has nobody else spotted this, or am I just barking up the right tree ? It's wonderfully helpful sometimes when an editor leaves a useful link to a probable copy vio - saves us a lot of work: [http://www.solarstone.co.uk/about solarstone]. The [http://whois.domaintools.com/solarstone.co.uk dom name] was taken out in 2004; the article started in 2005. It could be that the article and the web site bumph was "developed" side by side, but even this has to be some kind infringement doesn't it ? As the site doesn't say thats it's a mirror, I think we have to assume it's copyright - I shall tag as such and see what happens - wish me luck. [[User:Acabashi|Acabashi]] ([[User talk:Acabashi|talk]]) 17:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
4509 +++$+++ Acabashi +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4504 +++$+++ 4508 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.300411500E09 +++$+++ Jumped a bit too soon - the copy vio began May\/June 2009. So there is an earlier version to revert to - but even that's flawed. I'll see what happens - ho hum.  +++$+++ :::::Jumped a bit too soon - the copy vio began May/June 2009. So there is an earlier version to revert to - but even that's flawed. I'll see what happens - ho hum. [[User:Acabashi|Acabashi]] ([[User talk:Acabashi|talk]]) 18:25, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

266650 +++$+++ Buddhipriya +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-29 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.175227980E09 +++$+++ Greetings.  I notice that you have helped with vandal cleanups and editing on the [[Kama Sutra]] article. I recently proposed removal of the detailed chapter titles, which are not reliably sourced, as a step to reduce the juvenile interest in this article (See: [[Talk:Kama_Sutra#Chapter_titles_can_be_removed]]).  I am wondering if you would support such a step? My suggestion has gotten no feedback and I hesitate to just edit the titles out without having at least one supporter for the idea.  +++$+++ Greetings.  I notice that you have helped with vandal cleanups and editing on the [[Kama Sutra]] article. I recently proposed removal of the detailed chapter titles, which are not reliably sourced, as a step to reduce the juvenile interest in this article (See: [[Talk:Kama_Sutra#Chapter_titles_can_be_removed]]).  I am wondering if you would support such a step? My suggestion has gotten no feedback and I hesitate to just edit the titles out without having at least one supporter for the idea. [[User:Buddhipriya|Buddhipriya]] 21:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
266651 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266650 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.175239620E09 +++$+++ You have mail. +++$+++ ::You have mail.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
266652 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266650 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.175239920E09 +++$+++ Or wait till tommorow and see the whole file to copy edit. Thats better I think. +++$+++ ::Or wait till tommorow and see the whole file to copy edit. Thats better I think.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
266653 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266650 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.175241900E09 +++$+++ Just a trial. I dont understand \"your box\" method. +++$+++ ::Just a trial. I dont understand "your box" method.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
266654 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266650 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.175294040E09 +++$+++ How does a \"Age of Imperial Karnataka\" FA sound to you. Throwing in a few good maps, a few neat inscriptions images, a few friezes and sculptures. What do you think? +++$+++ ::How does a "Age of Imperial Karnataka" FA sound to you. Throwing in a few good maps, a few neat inscriptions images, a few friezes and sculptures. What do you think?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 15:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

528798 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-13 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.181743260E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] -->Hi there Royalbroil and thanks for all the US motorsport. Hmmm I am looking forward to this week's US GP....intersting season so far....In general, I don't think that the 1500 thing is a hard and fast limit...and people generally reward longer articles...anyway....It's mainly RS and NPOV which are the non negotiables...did I miss any? ''' +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] -->Hi there Royalbroil and thanks for all the US motorsport. Hmmm I am looking forward to this week's US GP....intersting season so far....In general, I don't think that the 1500 thing is a hard and fast limit...and people generally reward longer articles...anyway....It's mainly RS and NPOV which are the non negotiables...did I miss any? '''[[User:Blnguyen|Blnguyen]]'''  ([[User talk:Blnguyen|bananabucket]]) 07:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
528799 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528798 +++$+++ 528798 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.181954640E09 +++$+++ It sounds reasonable for the limit of a maximum of 1500 characters to be a soft limit. I'm not a Formula 1 fan. Believe it or not there aren't very many F1 fans in the U.S. I didn't become a fan even when Michael Andretti went to F1, and I was a big fan of his. F1 results don't get much TV time on local Sunday night news. NASCAR is top sports news and the two IndyCar series get lesser coverage. F1 often gets skipped.  +++$+++ :It sounds reasonable for the limit of a maximum of 1500 characters to be a soft limit. I'm not a Formula 1 fan. Believe it or not there aren't very many F1 fans in the U.S. I didn't become a fan even when Michael Andretti went to F1, and I was a big fan of his. F1 results don't get much TV time on local Sunday night news. NASCAR is top sports news and the two IndyCar series get lesser coverage. F1 often gets skipped. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 17:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

4511 +++$+++ Tinton5 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4511 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-09 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.299733260E09 +++$+++ Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but, I really could not find anywhere on that [http:\/\/thedeadrockstarsclub.com\/newentrees.html source] that Antonio Martinez has died.  I also could not find other reliable sources indicating this. If you can, or somebody else can, then that would be great. I will continue to search. Take care.  +++$+++ Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but, I really could not find anywhere on that [http://thedeadrockstarsclub.com/newentrees.html source] that Antonio Martinez has died.  I also could not find other reliable sources indicating this. If you can, or somebody else can, then that would be great. I will continue to search. Take care. [[User:Tinton5|Tinton5]] ([[User talk:Tinton5|talk]]) 21:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
4512 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4511 +++$+++ 4511 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.299733920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 21:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
4513 +++$+++ Tinton5 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4511 +++$+++ 4512 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.299734280E09 +++$+++ Oh man, you know, I thought about that, but I was not sure. Thanks so much for pointing this out ! I feel stupid.   +++$+++ ::Oh man, you know, I thought about that, but I was not sure. Thanks so much for pointing this out ! I feel stupid.  [[User:Tinton5|Tinton5]] ([[User talk:Tinton5|talk]]) 21:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

4514 +++$+++ markdask +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4514 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.300379460E09 +++$+++ Hi - I'm working on reducing the backlog of category:BLP unreferenced  articles and I chanced upon your name. Wow man you reference your articles soo well - its refreshing to see someone who makes my life easier.  +++$+++ Hi - I'm working on reducing the backlog of category:BLP unreferenced  articles and I chanced upon your name. Wow man you reference your articles soo well - its refreshing to see someone who makes my life easier. [[User:markdask|<font face="verdana" color="#00AA11">'''Mark'''</font>]]<small>[[User talk:markdask|<sup>'''Dask'''</sup>]]</small> 09:31, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
4515 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4514 +++$+++ 4514 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.300384440E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 10:54, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

4516 +++$+++ Acabashi +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4516 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.300407300E09 +++$+++ Hi Derek. You added to the article ([[Selfish Cunt]]) some time ago, so I'd appreciate a quick look to see if you, from your extensive knowledge, have anything further to add to the thing... revert anything you think fit. I saw this one in my random patrol and just couldn't resist it. Many thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Derek. You added to the article ([[Selfish Cunt]]) some time ago, so I'd appreciate a quick look to see if you, from your extensive knowledge, have anything further to add to the thing... revert anything you think fit. I saw this one in my random patrol and just couldn't resist it. Many thanks. [[User:Acabashi|Acabashi]] ([[User talk:Acabashi|talk]]) 17:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
4517 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4516 +++$+++ 4516 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.300509000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 21:30, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
4518 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4516 +++$+++ 4517 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.300511940E09 +++$+++ Sorry to hear that Derek - take as long a time out as you need.  Some things are more important than others.  Look after yourself and your family.   +++$+++ ::Sorry to hear that Derek - take as long a time out as you need.  Some things are more important than others.  Look after yourself and your family.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 22:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
4519 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4516 +++$+++ 4518 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.300515420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 23:17, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
4520 +++$+++ Acabashi +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4516 +++$+++ 4519 +++$+++ 2011-03-19 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.300531800E09 +++$+++ An inspiring life Derek. Sorry for you and your's loss.  +++$+++ ::::An inspiring life Derek. Sorry for you and your's loss. [[User:Acabashi|Acabashi]] ([[User talk:Acabashi|talk]]) 03:50, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

528806 +++$+++ 76.174.187.63 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528806 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-17 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.182104340E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:76.174.187.63|76.174.187.63]] 11:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
528807 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528806 +++$+++ 528806 +++$+++ 2007-06-17 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.182108480E09 +++$+++ Someone else believed you, so they changed the article to your version. I have left it alone. I consider the topic referenced and the discussion over. If you are interested in making positive contributions to Wikipedia, you can create a username (it's FREE AND EASY) and join me at WikiProject NASCAR. We would love to have you.  +++$+++ :Someone else believed you, so they changed the article to your version. I have left it alone. I consider the topic referenced and the discussion over. If you are interested in making positive contributions to Wikipedia, you can create a username (it's FREE AND EASY) and join me at WikiProject NASCAR. We would love to have you. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 12:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

568732 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568732 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-27 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.156735020E09 +++$+++ If others are involved in this [[WP:3RR|revert war]] then they should also receive the appropriate discipline. <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ If others are involved in this [[WP:3RR|revert war]] then they should also receive the appropriate discipline. <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''&nbsp;&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]] </span> 20:17, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
568733 +++$+++ Pgk +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568732 +++$+++ 568732 +++$+++ 2006-08-27 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.156735980E09 +++$+++ No need to link the diffs, I'm sure that [[WP:3RR]] was exceeded and then some. My point is that blocking is supposted to be preventative and in this case the war was stopped by protection. If the editor then engages in constructive dialogue the bad feeling which can arise from a block can be avoided. However like any admin it's down to your own judgement in the end as to if you think that the block is still required as a deterrant to future warring. I'm certainly not intending to unblock or make any further comments than the above. -- +++$+++ : No need to link the diffs, I'm sure that [[WP:3RR]] was exceeded and then some. My point is that blocking is supposted to be preventative and in this case the war was stopped by protection. If the editor then engages in constructive dialogue the bad feeling which can arise from a block can be avoided. However like any admin it's down to your own judgement in the end as to if you think that the block is still required as a deterrant to future warring. I'm certainly not intending to unblock or make any further comments than the above. --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">[[User_talk:Pgk|talk]]</font>)</sup> 20:33, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

4522 +++$+++ 203.39.34.76 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4522 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.300873260E09 +++$+++ Johnny Pearson appears to of died last Sunday. My respect for Mr Pearson is huge and want only for now his memory to have a good article. Can you list some suggestions on better wiki for this. There is much more to tell in the future. Regards [[Special:Contributions\/203.39.34.76|203.39.34.76]] ( +++$+++ Johnny Pearson appears to of died last Sunday. My respect for Mr Pearson is huge and want only for now his memory to have a good article. Can you list some suggestions on better wiki for this. There is much more to tell in the future. Regards [[Special:Contributions/203.39.34.76|203.39.34.76]] ([[User talk:203.39.34.76|talk]]) 02:41, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
4523 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4522 +++$+++ 4522 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.300917480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 14:58, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

528811 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-27 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.182938220E09 +++$+++ The criteria state that Good Article candidates should be marked as long if the ''main text'' is greater than around 32k. Note that the Mario Andretti article has approximately 20k of main text (according to Microsoft Word), and ''extensive'' table markup (especially from WikiProject Formula One's lengthy table). I think your attributing the long tag to the article is misleading.  +++$+++ The criteria state that Good Article candidates should be marked as long if the ''main text'' is greater than around 32k. Note that the Mario Andretti article has approximately 20k of main text (according to Microsoft Word), and ''extensive'' table markup (especially from WikiProject Formula One's lengthy table). I think your attributing the long tag to the article is misleading. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 02:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
528812 +++$+++ Horologium +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528811 +++$+++ 528811 +++$+++ 2007-06-27 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.182938940E09 +++$+++ OK, I'll buy that, after taking a closer look at it. There ''is'' a lot of coding on that page. I admit that I went through the list (after encountering a 66k article that was not tagged) and just added tags to everything over 40k. That is the first piece that is significantly over 32K that can be primarily attributed to table construction. I went ahead and removed the long tag, and left a decent edit summary for any who might question it. Sorry about that.  +++$+++ :OK, I'll buy that, after taking a closer look at it. There ''is'' a lot of coding on that page. I admit that I went through the list (after encountering a 66k article that was not tagged) and just added tags to everything over 40k. That is the first piece that is significantly over 32K that can be primarily attributed to table construction. I went ahead and removed the long tag, and left a decent edit summary for any who might question it. Sorry about that. [[User:Horologium|Horologium]] <small>[[User talk:Horologium|t]]-[[Special:contributions/Horologium|c]]</small> 03:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
528813 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528811 +++$+++ 528812 +++$+++ 2007-06-27 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.182939660E09 +++$+++ No problem - and I understand why you made the assumption. This is my first attempt at a Good Article, so I've been real careful dotting the i's and crossing the t's. I asked for help with learning the process, which I got from fellow WikiProject Motorsport member 4u1e.  +++$+++ ::No problem - and I understand why you made the assumption. This is my first attempt at a Good Article, so I've been real careful dotting the i's and crossing the t's. I asked for help with learning the process, which I got from fellow WikiProject Motorsport member 4u1e. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 03:21, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
528814 +++$+++ Horologium +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528811 +++$+++ 528813 +++$+++ 2007-06-27 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.182940440E09 +++$+++ I can relate to that. My first nomination just got approved yesterday-[[Coral Springs, Florida]]. We had to make a few changes at the suggestion of the reviewer, but it ''was'' successful. Don't freak out if the first review has a whole laundry list of things to fix; most of them will be easy fixes, and the ones that are a little bit harder will make the article better once they're done.  +++$+++ :::I can relate to that. My first nomination just got approved yesterday-[[Coral Springs, Florida]]. We had to make a few changes at the suggestion of the reviewer, but it ''was'' successful. Don't freak out if the first review has a whole laundry list of things to fix; most of them will be easy fixes, and the ones that are a little bit harder will make the article better once they're done. [[User:Horologium|Horologium]] <small>[[User talk:Horologium|t]]-[[Special:contributions/Horologium|c]]</small> 03:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
528815 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528811 +++$+++ 528811 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.183288260E09 +++$+++ I'm sure what we've done a lot more than that together. I'll help. I want to get the notability on the Nate Sallie article asserted first.  +++$+++ :I'm sure what we've done a lot more than that together. I'll help. I want to get the notability on the Nate Sallie article asserted first. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 04:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

4524 +++$+++ WestwoodMatt +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4524 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-19 09:17:00 +++$+++ 1.300551420E09 +++$+++ Many thanks if you can clear this one up. -- +++$+++ Many thanks if you can clear this one up. --[[User talk:WestwoodMatt|Matt Westwood]] 09:17, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
4525 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4524 +++$+++ 4524 +++$+++ 2011-03-19 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.300565700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 13:15, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
4526 +++$+++ WestwoodMatt +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4524 +++$+++ 4525 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.300636560E09 +++$+++ Good call - many thanks. I can't track down the original poster of this change but from the nature of other changes made from the same anonymous portal gives me to understand that there's some local knowledge there, so I'm trusting it. Thx for yr help. -- +++$+++ ::Good call - many thanks. I can't track down the original poster of this change but from the nature of other changes made from the same anonymous portal gives me to understand that there's some local knowledge there, so I'm trusting it. Thx for yr help. --[[User talk:WestwoodMatt|Matt Westwood]] 08:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

4528 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.300908360E09 +++$+++ See [[Deaths in 2011]].   :(    +++$+++ See [[Deaths in 2011]].   :(   [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 12:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
4529 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4528 +++$+++ 4528 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.300917180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 14:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

4530 +++$+++ Marshall46 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4530 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.300911300E09 +++$+++ I've replaced the source.  It's a fan site - is that reliable?   If anyone has a print source, great.  +++$+++ I've replaced the source.  It's a fan site - is that reliable?   If anyone has a print source, great. [[User:Marshall46|Marshall46]] ([[User talk:Marshall46|talk]]) 13:15, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
4531 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4530 +++$+++ 4530 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.300916880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 14:48, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
4532 +++$+++ Marshall46 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4530 +++$+++ 4531 +++$+++ 2011-03-24 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.300989060E09 +++$+++ Accepted. It's the only information I have been able to find.  The article on Italian Wikipedia has no sources at all. There seems to be nothing in print readily available. I suggest the article is left with the tag until it can be improved.  +++$+++ ::Accepted. It's the only information I have been able to find.  The article on Italian Wikipedia has no sources at all. There seems to be nothing in print readily available. I suggest the article is left with the tag until it can be improved. [[User:Marshall46|Marshall46]] ([[User talk:Marshall46|talk]]) 10:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

528820 +++$+++ DrKiernan +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528820 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-05 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.183675740E09 +++$+++ May I also say that there is nothing notable in the Optimus award, it is only like being accredited by the Tourist Board, much like any other hotel.  +++$+++ May I also say that there is nothing notable in the Optimus award, it is only like being accredited by the Tourist Board, much like any other hotel. [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] 15:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
528821 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528820 +++$+++ 528820 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.183679220E09 +++$+++ Sorry. You are right. A contributor had placed several other prod tags that I wanted to at least be discussed in a full AfD. I missed this one AfD.  +++$+++ :Sorry. You are right. A contributor had placed several other prod tags that I wanted to at least be discussed in a full AfD. I missed this one AfD. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 16:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

4533 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4533 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-25 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.301072700E09 +++$+++ Can you track down any birth and death dates?  I can't find anything at all.   +++$+++ Can you track down any birth and death dates?  I can't find anything at all.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 10:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
4534 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4533 +++$+++ 4533 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.301084640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 13:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
4535 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4533 +++$+++ 4534 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.301085900E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I could add a discography, but how many obscure B-sides by failed British 60s bands do people really need to know about?!   +++$+++ ::Thanks.  I could add a discography, but how many obscure B-sides by failed British 60s bands do people really need to know about?!  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 13:45, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
4536 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4533 +++$+++ 4535 +++$+++ 2011-03-26 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.301129040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 01:44, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
4537 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4533 +++$+++ 4536 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.301519760E09 +++$+++ [[The Moontrekkers|Don't look at those sources too closely!]]  Best I could do though....   +++$+++ ::::[[The Moontrekkers|Don't look at those sources too closely!]]  Best I could do though....  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 14:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
4538 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4533 +++$+++ 4537 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.301521020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 14:37, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
4539 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4533 +++$+++ 4538 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.301521260E09 +++$+++ And I'd forgotten that someone needs to go back to [[The Rockin' Berries]].  Are there any more like that, which need \"resuscitating\" after the copyvio fracas (which all seems to have gone very quiet now).   +++$+++ ::::::And I'd forgotten that someone needs to go back to [[The Rockin' Berries]].  Are there any more like that, which need "resuscitating" after the copyvio fracas (which all seems to have gone very quiet now).  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 14:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
4540 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4533 +++$+++ 4539 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.301634360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 22:06, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
4541 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4533 +++$+++ 4540 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.301635800E09 +++$+++ Well, I'll bear them in mind - though my first reaction, apart from the Joy Strings who I ''do'' remember, unfortunately, is - who the ''hell'' were Nelson Keene and Dick Jordan??  Bugger, I'll have to go and find out now.  But, if you want a real magnum opus, cast your eyes over [[John Walker (musician)]].  Drop me an email (via my user page) and I'll tell you a story!   +++$+++ ::::::::Well, I'll bear them in mind - though my first reaction, apart from the Joy Strings who I ''do'' remember, unfortunately, is - who the ''hell'' were Nelson Keene and Dick Jordan??  Bugger, I'll have to go and find out now.  But, if you want a real magnum opus, cast your eyes over [[John Walker (musician)]].  Drop me an email (via my user page) and I'll tell you a story!  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 22:30, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

266680 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-02 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.175569080E09 +++$+++ You say you don't want to get any more involved in this dispute, which is fair enough; I'm certainly not trying to browbeat you into agreeing with me. I'm just disappointed that the AMA, an organisation which I belong to and believe in, has let you down and alienated you in such a big way, and I really want to make amends and resolve the situation. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ You say you don't want to get any more involved in this dispute, which is fair enough; I'm certainly not trying to browbeat you into agreeing with me. I'm just disappointed that the AMA, an organisation which I belong to and believe in, has let you down and alienated you in such a big way, and I really want to make amends and resolve the situation. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 19:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
266681 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266680 +++$+++ 266680 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.175642280E09 +++$+++ On [[WP:ADOPT]], I don't think you really need that service - you're well-established here, while adoption is really for newbies who need some help getting to know how Wikipedia works.  But in terms of the AMA (and in general), I don't think it's fair to judge users on editcount alone; some users might have a high editcount due to lots of minor edits and vandalism reverts, while others might have fewer edits but more awareness of policy and dispute resolution. (By the way, I'm quite impressed that you've got 20,000 edits in eleven months. Do you use VandalProof?) As to your second point, I agree that there don't seem to be any serious reform proposals going forward for the AMA. The MfD closed today with no consensus; the only solid outcome seems to have been that MfD was an inappropriate forum for discussing the AMA's need for reform. However, the proposal at [[Wikipedia:Editor assistance]] still seems to be active; if it becomes a significant project, I may move there from the AMA. Its mission statement seems to clear up some of the problems with the AMA ethos (e.g. fighting your advocee's corner). Would you consider it an acceptable alternative to the AMA? <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :On [[WP:ADOPT]], I don't think you really need that service - you're well-established here, while adoption is really for newbies who need some help getting to know how Wikipedia works.  But in terms of the AMA (and in general), I don't think it's fair to judge users on editcount alone; some users might have a high editcount due to lots of minor edits and vandalism reverts, while others might have fewer edits but more awareness of policy and dispute resolution. (By the way, I'm quite impressed that you've got 20,000 edits in eleven months. Do you use VandalProof?) As to your second point, I agree that there don't seem to be any serious reform proposals going forward for the AMA. The MfD closed today with no consensus; the only solid outcome seems to have been that MfD was an inappropriate forum for discussing the AMA's need for reform. However, the proposal at [[Wikipedia:Editor assistance]] still seems to be active; if it becomes a significant project, I may move there from the AMA. Its mission statement seems to clear up some of the problems with the AMA ethos (e.g. fighting your advocee's corner). Would you consider it an acceptable alternative to the AMA? <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 16:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
266682 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266680 +++$+++ 266681 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.175645400E09 +++$+++ Of course I'd be willing to discuss things with you, if it would be helpful. Although I have far fewer edits than you (I'm hoping to chalk up my 4,000th today), I do have quite a lot of experience with Wikipolicy and the complicated (and ever-growing) community side of Wikipedia. In terms of wikijargon, you seem to be more \"[[:m:exopedian|exopedian]]\", while I'm more \"[[:m:metapedian|metapedian]]\". So I'd be happy to give you any advice I can. As to the past situation you mentioned, if it was the one involving [[User:SDas]] and [[Jagannath Temple (Puri)]], then that was me. In response to your assertion that you haven't seen any instances of AMA being useful, I would have to disagree based on my own experience. Thinking back over my past cases, the users in question most often just need a reminder to read [[WP:ATT]] and source all of their controversial edits. Only one case (my first one) turned out to be impossible to resolve amicably, and in that one the involved parties voluntarily disengaged. As to the Arbitrators, I'd agree with you that they tend to be fair and reasonable, and less combative than advocates. I think that the source of that is in the selection process; bear in mind that anyone who even stands for election to the Arbcom must be an admin in good standing with long experience in civil dispute-resolution. Advocates, on the other hand, aren't necessarily more experienced or mature than any of us; we even had a case of one advocate (who I won't name) who was actually asked to leave the AMA because he himself had been blocked repeatedly for getting into disputes! The trouble is that the AMA is a voluntary organisation, and its members don't receive any extra power or status, unlike Arbitrators. So we can't really expect the same standards. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Of course I'd be willing to discuss things with you, if it would be helpful. Although I have far fewer edits than you (I'm hoping to chalk up my 4,000th today), I do have quite a lot of experience with Wikipolicy and the complicated (and ever-growing) community side of Wikipedia. In terms of wikijargon, you seem to be more "[[:m:exopedian|exopedian]]", while I'm more "[[:m:metapedian|metapedian]]". So I'd be happy to give you any advice I can. As to the past situation you mentioned, if it was the one involving [[User:SDas]] and [[Jagannath Temple (Puri)]], then that was me. In response to your assertion that you haven't seen any instances of AMA being useful, I would have to disagree based on my own experience. Thinking back over my past cases, the users in question most often just need a reminder to read [[WP:ATT]] and source all of their controversial edits. Only one case (my first one) turned out to be impossible to resolve amicably, and in that one the involved parties voluntarily disengaged. As to the Arbitrators, I'd agree with you that they tend to be fair and reasonable, and less combative than advocates. I think that the source of that is in the selection process; bear in mind that anyone who even stands for election to the Arbcom must be an admin in good standing with long experience in civil dispute-resolution. Advocates, on the other hand, aren't necessarily more experienced or mature than any of us; we even had a case of one advocate (who I won't name) who was actually asked to leave the AMA because he himself had been blocked repeatedly for getting into disputes! The trouble is that the AMA is a voluntary organisation, and its members don't receive any extra power or status, unlike Arbitrators. So we can't really expect the same standards. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 17:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
266683 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266680 +++$+++ 266682 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.175651100E09 +++$+++ I've looked at the case file and some of the posts you and Steve Caruso left at [[WT:AMA]], and I have to say that this looks like a very unusual and complex case - I've never before seen a case file where the advocee's request to close the case was actually rejected, and I can't see any good reason why Steve should have done that; nor do I understand exactly why he's kept the case open when it's already been addressed by ArbCom. It also looks (to me as an outside observer) like the Co-ordinator was being mildly uncivil to you, although he did allude to having had e-mail correspondence with you, which obviously I don't know about. Basically I don't know the background to this case, and I wouldn't want to get involved, so I can't really give you any better advice on how to discuss this with him. The best advice I can give you is to disengage from the whole thing for the time being; don't contact anyone connected with the case, and just see what happens. What I wouldn't want is for you to become alienated from Wikipedia because of this; based on your record and your awards, you're one of the most prolific and hardworking article-writers, and lots of users appreciate the work you do here. It isn't worth letting your wiki-life get ruined over one single dispute. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::I've looked at the case file and some of the posts you and Steve Caruso left at [[WT:AMA]], and I have to say that this looks like a very unusual and complex case - I've never before seen a case file where the advocee's request to close the case was actually rejected, and I can't see any good reason why Steve should have done that; nor do I understand exactly why he's kept the case open when it's already been addressed by ArbCom. It also looks (to me as an outside observer) like the Co-ordinator was being mildly uncivil to you, although he did allude to having had e-mail correspondence with you, which obviously I don't know about. Basically I don't know the background to this case, and I wouldn't want to get involved, so I can't really give you any better advice on how to discuss this with him. The best advice I can give you is to disengage from the whole thing for the time being; don't contact anyone connected with the case, and just see what happens. What I wouldn't want is for you to become alienated from Wikipedia because of this; based on your record and your awards, you're one of the most prolific and hardworking article-writers, and lots of users appreciate the work you do here. It isn't worth letting your wiki-life get ruined over one single dispute. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 18:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
266684 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266680 +++$+++ 266681 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.175672460E09 +++$+++ Are you there? +++$+++ ::Are you there?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
266685 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266680 +++$+++ 266681 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.175673120E09 +++$+++ sorry about all the confusion. The stuff in boxD is the latest and greatest. I cut and paste this before I left on the holiday and sent you email about that\/or mentionde on this user page. +++$+++ ::sorry about all the confusion. The stuff in boxD is the latest and greatest. I cut and paste this before I left on the holiday and sent you email about that/or mentionde on this user page.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
266686 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266680 +++$+++ 266681 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.175673720E09 +++$+++ Which article, sandbox2 or BoxD? +++$+++ ::Which article, sandbox2 or BoxD?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

528825 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-11 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.184168940E09 +++$+++ Will do. Cheers.  +++$+++ Will do. Cheers. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] 08:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
528826 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528825 +++$+++ 528825 +++$+++ 2007-07-14 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.184441520E09 +++$+++ Think I've addressed satisfactorily, but there's one Indycar thing I can find a ref for. See the talk page.  +++$+++ :Think I've addressed satisfactorily, but there's one Indycar thing I can find a ref for. See the talk page. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] 12:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

528828 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-16 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.184645700E09 +++$+++ Ta for the booze. Chin, Chin! Well done with all your hard work - a well deserved GA, I feel. You may want to take a break from the topic for a bit, but when you feel up to it I agree with LordHarris that a Peer Review would be the best next step. Recently I've had most benefit from [[WP:BIO]] reviews, but if you do one it would be useful to ask the relevant wikiprojects to comment as well. I'm going to be pretty much out of contact for a week or two - we've finally completed on the purchase of our flat, so the next few days will be spent packing, unpacking, and (I suspect) trying to get the broadband reconnected.... Cheers.  +++$+++ Ta for the booze. Chin, Chin! Well done with all your hard work - a well deserved GA, I feel. You may want to take a break from the topic for a bit, but when you feel up to it I agree with LordHarris that a Peer Review would be the best next step. Recently I've had most benefit from [[WP:BIO]] reviews, but if you do one it would be useful to ask the relevant wikiprojects to comment as well. I'm going to be pretty much out of contact for a week or two - we've finally completed on the purchase of our flat, so the next few days will be spent packing, unpacking, and (I suspect) trying to get the broadband reconnected.... Cheers. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] 21:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
528829 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528828 +++$+++ 528828 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.184653740E09 +++$+++ I found 2 or 3 reliable sources while sourcing it to the GA level, so I'll be using those to expand the article a bit. One is a new bio from the National Sprint Car Hall of Fame, which I'll use to expand his early career. I was then planning on doing a solo GA attempt with my idol [[Alan Kulwicki]], who was a NASCAR champion from my state. Another article that is part of multiple WikiProjects. I might do a few articles at the GA level, until I feel like I understand it better, and then go for Featured Article. Good luck with the house, and have a pleasant well-earned wikibreak!  +++$+++ :I found 2 or 3 reliable sources while sourcing it to the GA level, so I'll be using those to expand the article a bit. One is a new bio from the National Sprint Car Hall of Fame, which I'll use to expand his early career. I was then planning on doing a solo GA attempt with my idol [[Alan Kulwicki]], who was a NASCAR champion from my state. Another article that is part of multiple WikiProjects. I might do a few articles at the GA level, until I feel like I understand it better, and then go for Featured Article. Good luck with the house, and have a pleasant well-earned wikibreak! [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 23:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
528830 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528828 +++$+++ 528829 +++$+++ 2007-07-20 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.184956560E09 +++$+++ Good stuff. I will have a look at the new material, but not yet. I'm on dial up at the moment and there are other things I should be doing (a ''lot'' of other things....) so I won't be editing for a while. Kulwicki was an interesting guy - his article should make a good story, I look forward to seeing the result! Cheers.  +++$+++ ::Good stuff. I will have a look at the new material, but not yet. I'm on dial up at the moment and there are other things I should be doing (a ''lot'' of other things....) so I won't be editing for a while. Kulwicki was an interesting guy - his article should make a good story, I look forward to seeing the result! Cheers. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] 11:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

4542 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-13 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.302679980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 00:33, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
4543 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4542 +++$+++ 4542 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.304494920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 00:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
4544 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4542 +++$+++ 4543 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.304541360E09 +++$+++ Sorry, missed your earlier post - I'll see what I can do (if they meet my personal \"notability\" \/ \"do I care?\" criteria, that is!)   +++$+++ ::Sorry, missed your earlier post - I'll see what I can do (if they meet my personal "notability" / "do I care?" criteria, that is!)  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 13:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
4545 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4542 +++$+++ 4544 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.305785580E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 23:13, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

266687 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266687 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-04 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.175674740E09 +++$+++ a faithful dog. +++$+++ a faithful dog.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
266688 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266687 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.175674800E09 +++$+++ Not a problem. Forget about Playbox2. BoxD is in. +++$+++ ::Not a problem. Forget about Playbox2. BoxD is in.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
266689 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266687 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.175675880E09 +++$+++ Empty Playbox2. +++$+++ ::Empty Playbox2.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
266690 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266687 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.175677260E09 +++$+++ I have been in comm with a guy in Bangalore (my home town) who is really serious about medieval architecture. he is going to send over lots of images of [[Gangas]] from [[Shravanabelagola]] and Manne including inscriptions, sculptures, friezes etc. He saw my article on [[Balligavi]] and [[Kambadahalli]] and wrote to me. +++$+++ ::I have been in comm with a guy in Bangalore (my home town) who is really serious about medieval architecture. he is going to send over lots of images of [[Gangas]] from [[Shravanabelagola]] and Manne including inscriptions, sculptures, friezes etc. He saw my article on [[Balligavi]] and [[Kambadahalli]] and wrote to me.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
266691 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266687 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.175678400E09 +++$+++ You forget, I can walk on hot coals too and sleep on a bed of nails. +++$+++ ::You forget, I can walk on hot coals too and sleep on a bed of nails.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
266692 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266687 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.175679060E09 +++$+++ Once you leave the visitor centre, it becomes ok. Lots of school kids who dont care about history. I loved history as a school kid. In fact I topped the class in history, not Math. Math and science came later, out of peer pressure. +++$+++ ::Once you leave the visitor centre, it becomes ok. Lots of school kids who dont care about history. I loved history as a school kid. In fact I topped the class in history, not Math. Math and science came later, out of peer pressure.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
266693 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266687 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.175679840E09 +++$+++ I have mentioned about the Virgal for the Hound of a Ganga king in the \"Rashtrakuta Society\" towards the end. +++$+++ ::I have mentioned about the Virgal for the Hound of a Ganga king in the "Rashtrakuta Society" towards the end.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

568736 +++$+++ Pascal.Tesson +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-28 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.156806360E09 +++$+++ Hi. I see you closed the AfD for [[San Francisco Bay Psychotherapy Center]]. Thanks but I want to remind you that the debate also concerned the related [[Sequoia Psychotherapy Center]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. I see you closed the AfD for [[San Francisco Bay Psychotherapy Center]]. Thanks but I want to remind you that the debate also concerned the related [[Sequoia Psychotherapy Center]]. Thanks. [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] 16:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
568737 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568736 +++$+++ 568736 +++$+++ 2006-08-28 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.156806780E09 +++$+++ Thanks, now deleted too! <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Thanks, now deleted too! <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''&nbsp;&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]] </span> 16:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

4546 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4546 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-01 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.301681820E09 +++$+++ Do you know any more about [http:\/\/www.allmusic.com\/artist\/jimmy-powell-p392930\/biography this guy]?  Judging by the birth and death dates given there, he must have been quite a prodigy!  But, seriously, if you have any info about him pre-1961 or post-1973 it would be useful - I feel a short article coming on!  Notability should be established through the Rod Stewart connection, I think, and there are various other online sources, but he seems to have disappeared after the early 70s.   +++$+++ Do you know any more about [http://www.allmusic.com/artist/jimmy-powell-p392930/biography this guy]?  Judging by the birth and death dates given there, he must have been quite a prodigy!  But, seriously, if you have any info about him pre-1961 or post-1973 it would be useful - I feel a short article coming on!  Notability should be established through the Rod Stewart connection, I think, and there are various other online sources, but he seems to have disappeared after the early 70s.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 11:17, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
4547 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4546 +++$+++ 4546 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.301690460E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 13:41, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
4548 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4546 +++$+++ 4546 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.301691720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 14:02, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
4549 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4546 +++$+++ 4548 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.301692680E09 +++$+++ How is it that, of all the sources I'd found (and there's quite a few) I'd managed to miss that one?!  Very grateful to you.  Off into the garden now, to get a break from all this!   +++$+++ ::How is it that, of all the sources I'd found (and there's quite a few) I'd managed to miss that one?!  Very grateful to you.  Off into the garden now, to get a break from all this!  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 14:18, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
4550 +++$+++ Arjayay +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4546 +++$+++ 4549 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.301697180E09 +++$+++ {{talk page stalker}} Allmusic claiming he was born in 1963, died in 1965 but was still recording in 1969 is [[Very interesting ...]]<br \/> Don't know if this [http:\/\/alextsu.narod.ru\/borderlinebooks\/uk6070s\/tapestry.html?http:\/\/alextsu.narod.ru\/borderlinebooks\/uk6070s\/b14z.html] adds anything?  +++$+++ :::{{talk page stalker}} Allmusic claiming he was born in 1963, died in 1965 but was still recording in 1969 is [[Very interesting ...]]<br /> Don't know if this [http://alextsu.narod.ru/borderlinebooks/uk6070s/tapestry.html?http://alextsu.narod.ru/borderlinebooks/uk6070s/b14z.html] adds anything? [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 15:33, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
4551 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4546 +++$+++ 4550 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.301756400E09 +++$+++ Thanks Arjayay - I'd got a very old version of the book that site's derived from, but never realised there was an online version before.  Excellent!   +++$+++ :::: Thanks Arjayay - I'd got a very old version of the book that site's derived from, but never realised there was an online version before.  Excellent!  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 08:00, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

528835 +++$+++ MatheMezzaMorphis163 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-23 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.185236100E09 +++$+++ Due to an exceedingly strange order of events, I find that I have never thanked you for the award of a glass of wine, regarding the [[Mezzamorphis]] Good Article promotion. So: thank you very, very much, and here's to many more GAs from [[WP:CCM]]! :-) --''' +++$+++ Due to an exceedingly strange order of events, I find that I have never thanked you for the award of a glass of wine, regarding the [[Mezzamorphis]] Good Article promotion. So: thank you very, very much, and here's to many more GAs from [[WP:CCM]]! :-) --'''[[User:MatheMezzaMorphis163|3M163]]'''//'''''[[User talk:MatheMezzaMorphis163|Complete Geek]]''''' 17:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
528836 +++$+++ MatheMezzaMorphis163 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528835 +++$+++ 528835 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.185305940E09 +++$+++ I'm all for it! I don't know too much about [[BarlowGirl]], but I'll most certainly do my best to copyedit\/research information\/add citations. --''' +++$+++ : I'm all for it! I don't know too much about [[BarlowGirl]], but I'll most certainly do my best to copyedit/research information/add citations. --'''[[User:MatheMezzaMorphis163|3M163]]'''//'''''[[User talk:MatheMezzaMorphis163|Complete Geek]]''''' 12:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

525046 +++$+++ Jon513 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-04 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.149487020E09 +++$+++ [[Template:Bible]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:bible|the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page]]. Thank you.<!-- Tfdnotice -->  +++$+++ [[Template:Bible]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:bible|the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page]]. Thank you.<!-- Tfdnotice --> [[User:Jon513|Jon513]] 22:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
525047 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525046 +++$+++ 525046 +++$+++ 2006-06-09 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.149846900E09 +++$+++ I have no objection to the deletion -- it looks like it has been effectively superseded. -- +++$+++ :I have no objection to the deletion -- it looks like it has been effectively superseded. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 02:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

266694 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266694 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-04 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.175723940E09 +++$+++ While you were gone I got exposed to the Wikipedia community again. You are back but the bad feeling lingers. I wonder if it is good that you are putting such effort here -- that Wikipedia is taking advantage of people like you who work hard and honestly on articles.  I realised from AMA that so many of the people here care nothing about the articles at all but only with their own power plays. Is is very discouraging. I will try to work on Box in afternoon. Sincerely,   +++$+++ While you were gone I got exposed to the Wikipedia community again. You are back but the bad feeling lingers. I wonder if it is good that you are putting such effort here -- that Wikipedia is taking advantage of people like you who work hard and honestly on articles.  I realised from AMA that so many of the people here care nothing about the articles at all but only with their own power plays. Is is very discouraging. I will try to work on Box in afternoon. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 14:59, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
266695 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266694 +++$+++ 266694 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.175724360E09 +++$+++ P.S. I keep getting email messages from you but there is nothing in them. Maybe I can't figure out my own email anymore. One of my messages to you was returned as undeliverable. Maybe a vandal has changed my email address again. Discouraged, -- +++$+++ :P.S. I keep getting email messages from you but there is nothing in them. Maybe I can't figure out my own email anymore. One of my messages to you was returned as undeliverable. Maybe a vandal has changed my email address again. Discouraged, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 15:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

4553 +++$+++ Acabashi +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4553 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-02 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.301730840E09 +++$+++ Picking you and your reader\u2019s brains yet again. I have been contributing to this: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Gemma Mewse]]. I am wondering if you have anything in your vast array of information (perhaps too recent?), and knowledge of what is acceptable in band articles, to give your help to, or opinion on, this article. I have been supporting deletion but I\u2019m not dogmatic enough not to change my mind if I\u2019m off-kilter, especially as [[Gemma Mewse]] has a real profile out there among her loyal fans, and could well be notable in the non-virtual world, but perhaps difficult to prove in Wikipedia terms. I\u2019m loath to add more to the discussion as it\u2019s all getting a tad over-fruity. A level-headed overview would be appreciated. As always, I am inclined to defer to your better judgment.  Best wishes,  +++$+++ Picking you and your reader’s brains yet again. I have been contributing to this: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemma Mewse]]. I am wondering if you have anything in your vast array of information (perhaps too recent?), and knowledge of what is acceptable in band articles, to give your help to, or opinion on, this article. I have been supporting deletion but I’m not dogmatic enough not to change my mind if I’m off-kilter, especially as [[Gemma Mewse]] has a real profile out there among her loyal fans, and could well be notable in the non-virtual world, but perhaps difficult to prove in Wikipedia terms. I’m loath to add more to the discussion as it’s all getting a tad over-fruity. A level-headed overview would be appreciated. As always, I am inclined to defer to your better judgment.  Best wishes, [[User:Acabashi|Acabashi]] ([[User talk:Acabashi|talk]]) 00:54, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
4554 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4553 +++$+++ 4553 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.301936820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 10:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
4555 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4553 +++$+++ 4553 +++$+++ 2011-04-14 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.302843300E09 +++$+++ In Derek's absence - the lazy sod hasn't been here for 24 hours!! - I've moved it for you.  All you needed to do is click the \"Move\" tab at the top of the page and fill out the details.  Cheers,  +++$+++ :In Derek's absence - the lazy sod hasn't been here for 24 hours!! - I've moved it for you.  All you needed to do is click the "Move" tab at the top of the page and fill out the details.  Cheers, [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 21:55, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

528843 +++$+++ Adrian M. H. +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528843 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-16 10:18:00 +++$+++ 1.187284680E09 +++$+++ Hello there, RoyalBroil. I want to seek your input initially into a major reworking that currently resides in my [[User:Adrian_M._H.\/Sandbox#New_driver_infobox|sandbox]]. I would like to provide some of the rationalisation that Andy Mabbett was so keen for, but without going that far, so I thought about an infobox that might work well for anyone outside &ndash; for example &ndash; F1, rallying, and NASCAR or dirt racing. By the same token, the existing infoboxes could use some improvement. It is still work in progress, but your opinion would be valued. One of the biggest issues is how to make the changeover if we decide to make major revisions; I opted not to change the existing infobox, as that would require immediate editing of around 50 articles, so maybe a different name is the only way? I'll keep an eye on this page if you'd prefer to reply here, but I thought I should keep it off the project talk page for now in case that guy sticks his oar in prematurely. ''''' +++$+++ Hello there, RoyalBroil. I want to seek your input initially into a major reworking that currently resides in my [[User:Adrian_M._H./Sandbox#New_driver_infobox|sandbox]]. I would like to provide some of the rationalisation that Andy Mabbett was so keen for, but without going that far, so I thought about an infobox that might work well for anyone outside &ndash; for example &ndash; F1, rallying, and NASCAR or dirt racing. By the same token, the existing infoboxes could use some improvement. It is still work in progress, but your opinion would be valued. One of the biggest issues is how to make the changeover if we decide to make major revisions; I opted not to change the existing infobox, as that would require immediate editing of around 50 articles, so maybe a different name is the only way? I'll keep an eye on this page if you'd prefer to reply here, but I thought I should keep it off the project talk page for now in case that guy sticks his oar in prematurely. '''''[[User:Adrian M. H.|<font color="Gray">Adrian</font>]] [[User talk:Adrian M. H.|<font color="Gray">M. H.</font>]]''''' 10:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
528844 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528843 +++$+++ 528843 +++$+++ 2007-08-16 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.187298960E09 +++$+++ I've been having ISP problems for the last 6 days, so that's why I haven't been here. The radio on my [[Wi Fi]] connnect hasn't been working. I just figured out that it works for about 10 minutes if cold. Hopefully it will be solved very soon.  +++$+++ :I've been having ISP problems for the last 6 days, so that's why I haven't been here. The radio on my [[Wi Fi]] connnect hasn't been working. I just figured out that it works for about 10 minutes if cold. Hopefully it will be solved very soon. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 14:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
528845 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528843 +++$+++ 528844 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.187417100E09 +++$+++ I finally got a new radio for my WiFi after 7 very long days, and it is working properly. Off to some motorcycle and 4-wheeler races now though.  +++$+++ ::I finally got a new radio for my WiFi after 7 very long days, and it is working properly. Off to some motorcycle and 4-wheeler races now though. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 23:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
528846 +++$+++ Adrian M. H. +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528843 +++$+++ 528845 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.187417220E09 +++$+++ No worries. Have a nice time! I have opened a discussion at [[WT:MOTOR]]; early days, but looks like we might just get something sorted out. Regards, ''''' +++$+++ :::No worries. Have a nice time! I have opened a discussion at [[WT:MOTOR]]; early days, but looks like we might just get something sorted out. Regards, '''''[[User:Adrian M. H.|<font color="Gray">Adrian</font>]] [[User talk:Adrian M. H.|<font color="Gray">M. H.</font>]]''''' 23:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

4556 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-17 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.303056480E09 +++$+++ I only ask because you often put up a banner when you're away.  Hope you're out enjoying the sunshine!  Feel free to check out [[Bobby Jameson|my latest \"masterpiece\"]] when you get back - interesting story!  Regards,  +++$+++ I only ask because you often put up a banner when you're away.  Hope you're out enjoying the sunshine!  Feel free to check out [[Bobby Jameson|my latest "masterpiece"]] when you get back - interesting story!  Regards, [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 09:08, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
4557 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4556 +++$+++ 4556 +++$+++ 2011-04-17 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.303094100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 19:35, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
4558 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4556 +++$+++ 4557 +++$+++ 2011-04-17 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.303101960E09 +++$+++ Good to hear it.  The Jameson story is fascinating, although his blog doesn't half go on a bit!   +++$+++ ::Good to hear it.  The Jameson story is fascinating, although his blog doesn't half go on a bit!  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 21:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
4559 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4556 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.309445400E09 +++$+++ ... now linked to by [http:\/\/www.bobbyjameson.blogspot.com\/ the man himself].  Always a cause for mild celebration when that happens!   +++$+++ ::::... now linked to by [http://www.bobbyjameson.blogspot.com/ the man himself].  Always a cause for mild celebration when that happens!  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 07:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
4560 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4556 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.309462860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 12:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

528847 +++$+++ SineBot +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528847 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-21 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.187738820E09 +++$+++ Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the [[Shift key]], and pressing the key with the tilde pictured.  You may also click on the signature button [[Image:Button sig2.png]] located above the edit window.  This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> -- +++$+++ Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the [[Shift key]], and pressing the key with the tilde pictured.  You may also click on the signature button [[Image:Button sig2.png]] located above the edit window.  This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] 16:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
528848 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528847 +++$+++ 528847 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.187741340E09 +++$+++ I have been purposely omitting the signature while compiling a list for [[Portal:Wisconsin]]. I have reverted your edits. I ALWAYS sign otherwise. I noticed the !nosign! too late. I was using !NOSIGN, which is the code for a different bot.  +++$+++ :I have been purposely omitting the signature while compiling a list for [[Portal:Wisconsin]]. I have reverted your edits. I ALWAYS sign otherwise. I noticed the !nosign! too late. I was using !NOSIGN, which is the code for a different bot. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 17:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

4561 +++$+++ Elitropia +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-23 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.303572420E09 +++$+++ Hi Derek! Recently I cleaned up and fully referenced the Small Faces article. Here is the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Small_Faces&diff=410149124&oldid=410026773 previous article] before I started cleaning and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Small_Faces after]. Do you mind reading? Thanks in advance. ~  +++$+++ Hi Derek! Recently I cleaned up and fully referenced the Small Faces article. Here is the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Small_Faces&diff=410149124&oldid=410026773 previous article] before I started cleaning and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Faces after]. Do you mind reading? Thanks in advance. ~ [[User:Elitropia|Elitropia]] ([[User talk:Elitropia|talk]]) 08:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
4562 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4561 +++$+++ 4561 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.303579860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 10:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
4563 +++$+++ Elitropia +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4561 +++$+++ 4562 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.303743660E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the positive comment, Derek : ) ~  +++$+++ ::Thank you for the positive comment, Derek : ) ~ [[User:Elitropia|Elitropia]] ([[User talk:Elitropia|talk]]) 08:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

528850 +++$+++ Onorem +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528850 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-24 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.187985060E09 +++$+++ I won't replace the tag, but I disagree that \"notability as a fully professional national series appears obvious.\"  It's a 3 year old league that now has \"a few professional drivers.\" That doesn't seem obviously notable to me. -- +++$+++ I won't replace the tag, but I disagree that "notability as a fully professional national series appears obvious."  It's a 3 year old league that now has "a few professional drivers." That doesn't seem obviously notable to me. --[[User:Onorem|Onorem]]♠[[User talk:Onorem|Dil]] 12:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
528851 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528850 +++$+++ 528850 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.188001980E09 +++$+++ Ok, fully professional is too strong. I highly doubt it would be deleted in an AFD discussion. I would strongly advocate for its inclusion. Sorry that my edit summary was worded too strong, especially the word \"obvious\".  +++$+++ :Ok, fully professional is too strong. I highly doubt it would be deleted in an AFD discussion. I would strongly advocate for its inclusion. Sorry that my edit summary was worded too strong, especially the word "obvious". [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 17:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

4564 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-06 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.304698980E09 +++$+++ ...have a look at [http:\/\/www.bradfordtimeline.co.uk\/music.htm this site].  I hadn't seen it before - hours of fun!   +++$+++ ...have a look at [http://www.bradfordtimeline.co.uk/music.htm this site].  I hadn't seen it before - hours of fun!  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 09:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
4565 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4564 +++$+++ 4564 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.305004680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 22:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
4566 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4564 +++$+++ 4565 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.305005040E09 +++$+++ Where do people dig up all this info from?  Which reminds me, I must clear out all those 70s magazines from the garage sometime!  Yes, I've had a couple of messages from John Walker's people - glad we could do our bit by getting some reliable info up in time.  Don't fall off the aqueduct - are you going along it, or just underneath?   +++$+++ ::Where do people dig up all this info from?  Which reminds me, I must clear out all those 70s magazines from the garage sometime!  Yes, I've had a couple of messages from John Walker's people - glad we could do our bit by getting some reliable info up in time.  Don't fall off the aqueduct - are you going along it, or just underneath?  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 22:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
4567 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4564 +++$+++ 4566 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.305006420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 22:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
4568 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4564 +++$+++ 4567 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.305053760E09 +++$+++ Right - after this little lot - [[Kingsize Taylor and the Dominoes]], [[Derry and the Seniors]], [[Howie Casey]] - I think I need a break!    +++$+++ ::::Right - after this little lot - [[Kingsize Taylor and the Dominoes]], [[Derry and the Seniors]], [[Howie Casey]] - I think I need a break!   [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 11:56, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
4569 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4564 +++$+++ 4568 +++$+++ 2011-05-16 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.305586500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 15:55, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

528853 +++$+++ Guroadrunner +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528853 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-26 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.188112800E09 +++$+++ Thank you again and here's hoping Thunder Valley gives us a good race tonight!  +++$+++ Thank you again and here's hoping Thunder Valley gives us a good race tonight! [[User:Guroadrunner|Guroadrunner]] 00:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
528854 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528853 +++$+++ 528853 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.188352200E09 +++$+++ I'd like to thank my [[parent]]s, my family, [[God]], and most of all, all of my fans up in the balcony! Did I hit all of the cliches? Seriously, thanks for the recognition! DYK has been a very positive, exciting, and rewarding experience.  +++$+++ :I'd like to thank my [[parent]]s, my family, [[God]], and most of all, all of my fans up in the balcony! Did I hit all of the cliches? Seriously, thanks for the recognition! DYK has been a very positive, exciting, and rewarding experience. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 18:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

439971 +++$+++ LoriLee +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.310755200E09 +++$+++ We hope you're able to [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/TCMI\/BackstagePass2#Sign up|attend]] the upcoming Backstage Pass! If you're not able to attend, but are interested in remaining involved and up to date on the museum's Wikipedia project, please sign up on our [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/TCMI\/Volunteer#E-Volunteer sign up|E-Volunteer page]]. There will also be an opportunity to participate in the Edit-a-Thon [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/TCMI\/Caplan Collection|online]], if you cannot attend on-site. If you'd like to make a request for images or research content from our curators, you can add to the [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/TCMI\/Requests|Requests page]]. Let me know if you have any questions and I hope to be in touch!  +++$+++ We hope you're able to [[Wikipedia:GLAM/TCMI/BackstagePass2#Sign up|attend]] the upcoming Backstage Pass! If you're not able to attend, but are interested in remaining involved and up to date on the museum's Wikipedia project, please sign up on our [[Wikipedia:GLAM/TCMI/Volunteer#E-Volunteer sign up|E-Volunteer page]]. There will also be an opportunity to participate in the Edit-a-Thon [[Wikipedia:GLAM/TCMI/Caplan Collection|online]], if you cannot attend on-site. If you'd like to make a request for images or research content from our curators, you can add to the [[Wikipedia:GLAM/TCMI/Requests|Requests page]]. Let me know if you have any questions and I hope to be in touch! [[User:LoriLee|LoriLee]] ([[User talk:LoriLee|talk]]) 11:40, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
439972 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Removed all comments prior to Jan 2003. -- +++$+++ * Removed all comments prior to Jan 2003. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 04:42 Jan 1, 2003 (UTC)
439973 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Removed all comments prior to Feb 2003. -- +++$+++ * Removed all comments prior to Feb 2003. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 10:19 Feb 3, 2003 (UTC)
439974 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Removed all comments prior to March 2003. -- +++$+++ * Removed all comments prior to March 2003. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 21:19 Mar 3, 2003 (UTC)
439975 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Removed all comments prior to April 2003. -- +++$+++ * Removed all comments prior to April 2003. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 08:14 25 May 2003 (UTC)
439976 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to May 31 2003. - +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to May 31 2003. -[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 19:14 31 May 2003 (UTC)
439977 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to June 21, 2003. -- +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to June 21, 2003. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 18:58 21 Jun 2003 (UTC)
439978 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to July 3, 2003. -- +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to July 3, 2003. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 21:51 3 Jul 2003 (UTC)
439979 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to July 22, 2003. -- +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to July 22, 2003. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 09:07 24 Jul 2003 (UTC)
439980 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 2003-08-28 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.062061860E09 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to August 28, 2003. +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to August 28, 2003.[[User:Eloquence|&mdash;Eloquence]] 02:11, Aug 28, 2003 (UTC)
439981 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 2003-10-15 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.066282740E09 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to October 15, 2003. +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to October 15, 2003.[[User:Eloquence|&mdash;Eloquence]] 22:39, Oct 15, 2003 (UTC)
439982 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 2003-12-05 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.070666220E09 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to December 5, 2003. +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to December 5, 2003.[[User:Eloquence|&mdash;Eloquence]] 15:17, Dec 5, 2003 (UTC)
439983 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 2003-12-20 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.071952920E09 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to December 20, 2003. +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to December 20, 2003.[[User:Eloquence|&mdash;Eloquence]] 12:42, Dec 20, 2003 (UTC)
439984 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 2004-02-22 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.077523020E09 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to February 23, 2004. +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to February 23, 2004.[[User:Eloquence|&mdash;Eloquence]] 23:57, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC)
439985 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 2004-04-03 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.081012320E09 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to April 2, 2004.[[User:Eloquence|--Eloquence]] +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to April 2, 2004.[[User:Eloquence|--Eloquence]][[User:Eloquence/Comment policy|*]] 09:12, Apr 3, 2004 (UTC)
439986 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 2004-06-04 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.086376020E09 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to June 3, 2004.--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to June 3, 2004.--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]][[User:Eloquence/CP|*]] 12:07, Jun 4, 2004 (UTC)
439987 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 2004-12-25 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.104002700E09 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to December 24, 2004.--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to December 24, 2004.--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]][[User:Eloquence/CP|*]] 11:25, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
439988 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 2005-06-21 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.119357540E09 +++$+++ Removed all comments up to June 15, 2005.--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] +++$+++ * Removed all comments up to June 15, 2005.--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]][[User:Eloquence/CP|*]] 05:39, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
439989 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 2005-12-08 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.134109800E09 +++$+++ Removed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Eloquence&oldid=28656502 all comments up to December 8, 2005].--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] +++$+++ * Removed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eloquence&oldid=28656502 all comments up to December 8, 2005].--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]][[User:Eloquence/CP|*]] 22:30, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
439990 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.152166980E09 +++$+++ Removed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Eloquence&oldid=62190213 all comments up to July 5, 2006.]--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] +++$+++ * Removed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eloquence&oldid=62190213 all comments up to July 5, 2006.]--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]][[User:Eloquence/CP|*]] 23:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
439991 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 439971 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 07:22:00 +++$+++ 1.246890120E09 +++$+++ Removed all coments up to July 5, 2009.--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] +++$+++ * Removed all coments up to July 5, 2009.--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]][[User:Eloquence/CP|*]] 07:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

4570 +++$+++ Arjayay +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4570 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-17 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.305678720E09 +++$+++ I've reverted an IPs change to 9 March 1945 as it contradicted the reference cited in the article - the Dead Rock Stars Club.<br \/>However, I suspect the introduction to his poems (issued 11 years before he died) probably got the year right - albeit it doesn't give a date.<br \/>Thanks -  +++$+++ I've reverted an IPs change to 9 March 1945 as it contradicted the reference cited in the article - the Dead Rock Stars Club.<br />However, I suspect the introduction to his poems (issued 11 years before he died) probably got the year right - albeit it doesn't give a date.<br />Thanks - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 17:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
4571 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4570 +++$+++ 4570 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.305683940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 18:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

4572 +++$+++ Mblackuk +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4572 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-05 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.307261100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Mblackuk|Mblackuk]] ([[User talk:Mblackuk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mblackuk|contribs]]) 01:05, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
4573 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4572 +++$+++ 4572 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.307306100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 13:35, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

525050 +++$+++ Richardcavell +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-11 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.150094340E09 +++$+++ I would use the paper-based versions of the NA, which are in my university's library. I don't know of any online version that is reliable enough to be used as a source for wikipedia. -  +++$+++ I would use the paper-based versions of the NA, which are in my university's library. I don't know of any online version that is reliable enough to be used as a source for wikipedia. - [[User:Richardcavell|Richardcavell]] 23:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
525051 +++$+++ Mauvila +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525050 +++$+++ 525050 +++$+++ 2006-07-17 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.153139880E09 +++$+++ [[Terminologia Anatomica]] (TA) has replaced the NA, and preference (via committee vote) is the first word listed (in Latin).  I got a hard copy of TA (and English translations) off Amazon, but the online medical dictionary at Mercksource (Dorland's I think) has them for free.  -- +++$+++ :[[Terminologia Anatomica]] (TA) has replaced the NA, and preference (via committee vote) is the first word listed (in Latin).  I got a hard copy of TA (and English translations) off Amazon, but the online medical dictionary at Mercksource (Dorland's I think) has them for free.  --[[User:Mauvila|Mauvila]] 05:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
525052 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525050 +++$+++ 525050 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.150246560E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I don't think I can help with the SNOMED, but I did add the ICD10 link to [[Gilbert's disease]]. -- +++$+++ :Sorry, I don't think I can help with the SNOMED, but I did add the ICD10 link to [[Gilbert's disease]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 17:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
525053 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525050 +++$+++ 525050 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.150248960E09 +++$+++ We're glad to have you here! Thanks for the URL -- I was not familiar with that website. Currently, SNOMED is not one of the parameters available for the disease infobox. If you believe it should be added, leave a comment at [[Template talk:Infobox Disease]], and we can discuss it in a forum with greater public visibility. -- +++$+++ :We're glad to have you here! Thanks for the URL -- I was not familiar with that website. Currently, SNOMED is not one of the parameters available for the disease infobox. If you believe it should be added, leave a comment at [[Template talk:Infobox Disease]], and we can discuss it in a forum with greater public visibility. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 18:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

4574 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4574 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-08 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.307594460E09 +++$+++ What do you think?  Worthwhile or not?   +++$+++ What do you think?  Worthwhile or not?  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 21:41, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
4575 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4574 +++$+++ 4574 +++$+++ 2011-06-08 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.307595660E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 22:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

4576 +++$+++ Johnanth +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-29 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.309384620E09 +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of [[Special:Contributions\/Derek R Bullamore|your recent edits]], such as the one you made to [[:Mick Ronson]], did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee\/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you!<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> --  +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of [[Special:Contributions/Derek R Bullamore|your recent edits]], such as the one you made to [[:Mick Ronson]], did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you!<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> -- [[User:Johnanth|''Yannis A.'']] <sup>[[User talk:Johnanth|✆]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Johnanth|☑]]</sup> 14:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
4577 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4576 +++$+++ 4576 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.309385640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 15:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

266721 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266721 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.175764200E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Now I will watch TV with the family for a while +++$+++ Thanks. Now I will watch TV with the family for a while[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
266722 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266721 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.175764620E09 +++$+++ You will be surprised. I have been watching western's since I was a kid on TV . I mean John Wayne, Clint Eastwood etc. I have read more Louis L'mour than most. I always admired the horses, the outdoors etc.So I did learn something about how America was won or lost (depending..) +++$+++ ::You will be surprised. I have been watching western's since I was a kid on TV . I mean John Wayne, Clint Eastwood etc. I have read more Louis L'mour than most. I always admired the horses, the outdoors etc.So I did learn something about how America was won or lost (depending..)[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

4578 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-30 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.309445160E09 +++$+++ Greetings!  Do you happen to have any information on the birth details of the members of The Big Three?  Details were added in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=The_Big_Three_%28musical_group%29&diff=117941685&oldid=117939021 this edit] by an IP, long since disappeared, back in 2007, and I haven't been able to track down any sources.  I'm thinking of putting together a stub on Brian Casser, of Cass & the Casanovas etc., and there seems to be some confusion as to whether he was born in Liverpool, or in Newcastle as the article says.  Doesn't life lead us down some overgrown and narrow byways??!!  Any info welcome as usual!  Regards,  +++$+++ Greetings!  Do you happen to have any information on the birth details of the members of The Big Three?  Details were added in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Big_Three_%28musical_group%29&diff=117941685&oldid=117939021 this edit] by an IP, long since disappeared, back in 2007, and I haven't been able to track down any sources.  I'm thinking of putting together a stub on Brian Casser, of Cass & the Casanovas etc., and there seems to be some confusion as to whether he was born in Liverpool, or in Newcastle as the article says.  Doesn't life lead us down some overgrown and narrow byways??!!  Any info welcome as usual!  Regards, [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 07:46, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
4579 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4578 +++$+++ 4578 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.309462860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 12:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

266723 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.175766060E09 +++$+++ P.S. My wife swears I am two faced and her dad too:) +++$+++ P.S. My wife swears I am two faced and her dad too:)[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
266724 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266723 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.175766060E09 +++$+++ I mean he is a Gemini too. +++$+++ ::I mean he is a Gemini too.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

4580 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4580 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.309877820E09 +++$+++ Ooh!  Thank you!! A spinning one!!! - never had one of those before!!!!  What have I done to deserve this?  Seriously, I'm very grateful that the little that I do here does get noticed - although part of me sometimes wishes that someone would do something here that annoys me sufficiently to compel me to get more of a life elsewhere....  (Not tempting fate, of course!)  Anyway, muchas gracias again.  :-)   +++$+++ Ooh!  Thank you!! A spinning one!!! - never had one of those before!!!!  What have I done to deserve this?  Seriously, I'm very grateful that the little that I do here does get noticed - although part of me sometimes wishes that someone would do something here that annoys me sufficiently to compel me to get more of a life elsewhere....  (Not tempting fate, of course!)  Anyway, muchas gracias again.  :-)  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 07:57, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4581 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4580 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.310365020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 23:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

4582 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-30 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309498440E09 +++$+++ The Allmusic source is a good one, and the fact the band contains members who are clearly notable themselves tips the balance. The article I deleted was very minimal; I would have no objection to you creating a new article.  +++$+++ The Allmusic source is a good one, and the fact the band contains members who are clearly notable themselves tips the balance. The article I deleted was very minimal; I would have no objection to you creating a new article. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 22:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
4583 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4582 +++$+++ 4582 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.309554240E09 +++$+++ Et voil\xe0 - [[Judas Jump]].  Thanks -  +++$+++ :Et voilà - [[Judas Jump]].  Thanks - [[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 14:04, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
4584 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4582 +++$+++ 4582 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311141720E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Don't feed the trolls|DFTT]] -  +++$+++ :[[Wikipedia:Don't feed the trolls|DFTT]] - [[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 23:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

528871 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528871 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-24 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.190693520E09 +++$+++ I fiddled with your DYK hook and added a photo of the Underbird car. You should check it out and make sure it is O.K.  -- +++$+++ I fiddled with your DYK hook and added a photo of the Underbird car. You should check it out and make sure it is O.K.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="0E77DC">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 21:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
528872 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528871 +++$+++ 528871 +++$+++ 2007-09-24 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.190694480E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the great alt hook, and for bringing it to my attention. I have suggested using your hook.  +++$+++ :Thank you for the great alt hook, and for bringing it to my attention. I have suggested using your hook. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 21:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
528873 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528871 +++$+++ 528872 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.190704320E09 +++$+++ Ha! Just in time.  -- +++$+++ ::Ha! Just in time.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 00:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

266728 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.175820300E09 +++$+++ Regarding the minor feudatories, From what I have read, seems often famous poets and scholars received early patronage from these fuedatories and eventually ended up writing great classic in the courts of their overlords. The feudatories may have acted as a sieve, weeding out mediocre talent and letting the top guys pass thru. This is why I want to write a detailed artcle on \"Minor Kingdoms of Karnataka\". For this I will have to travel to the state monuments, small villages etc. Not much literature about them is available. I had one book by that same name by Dr. Venkatesh but returned it back to Barnes and Nobles. At some point I will reorder it from Vedams Books. +++$+++ Regarding the minor feudatories, From what I have read, seems often famous poets and scholars received early patronage from these fuedatories and eventually ended up writing great classic in the courts of their overlords. The feudatories may have acted as a sieve, weeding out mediocre talent and letting the top guys pass thru. This is why I want to write a detailed artcle on "Minor Kingdoms of Karnataka". For this I will have to travel to the state monuments, small villages etc. Not much literature about them is available. I had one book by that same name by Dr. Venkatesh but returned it back to Barnes and Nobles. At some point I will reorder it from Vedams Books.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
266729 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266728 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.175826720E09 +++$+++ Good question. I will get back to you a little later. +++$+++ ::Good question. I will get back to you a little later.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

4585 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.312560240E09 +++$+++ Don't know if this has been raised with you before, but do you have anything definitive on [[Freda Payne]]'s year of birth?  Most sources that I can find seem to say 1945, but there's a long-running, slow-moving (usually), edit war on her article that seems to fluctuate between 1945 and 1942.  Can you shed any light on it?  She may well have cut three years off her age at some point, but on the other hand she is a [[WP:BLP|living person]], so we tread with caution!  Regards,  +++$+++ Don't know if this has been raised with you before, but do you have anything definitive on [[Freda Payne]]'s year of birth?  Most sources that I can find seem to say 1945, but there's a long-running, slow-moving (usually), edit war on her article that seems to fluctuate between 1945 and 1942.  Can you shed any light on it?  She may well have cut three years off her age at some point, but on the other hand she is a [[WP:BLP|living person]], so we tread with caution!  Regards, [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 09:04, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
4586 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4585 +++$+++ 4585 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.312603680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 21:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
4587 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4585 +++$+++ 4586 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.312603980E09 +++$+++ Welcome back!  Yup, I'm sure you're right.  Following discussion at [[WP:BLPN]] I've taken the radical step of adding a [[WP:FN|footnote]].   +++$+++ ::Welcome back!  Yup, I'm sure you're right.  Following discussion at [[WP:BLPN]] I've taken the radical step of adding a [[WP:FN|footnote]].  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 21:13, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
4588 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ 4585 +++$+++ 4587 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.312604760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore#top|talk]]) 21:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

266730 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.175833380E09 +++$+++ [[Kadamba Dynasty]], [[Western Ganga Dynasty]] (I will get good images from an Indian guy), [[Seuna Yadavas of Devagiri]] (this was an article I created and was later expanded by others, but became a hornets nest and caused much of the animosity in some users against me), [[Kalachuri]] (Southern). All this plus architecture articles on all the Kingdoms I have worked on. Overall it looks we are booked for the next 2 years. +++$+++ [[Kadamba Dynasty]], [[Western Ganga Dynasty]] (I will get good images from an Indian guy), [[Seuna Yadavas of Devagiri]] (this was an article I created and was later expanded by others, but became a hornets nest and caused much of the animosity in some users against me), [[Kalachuri]] (Southern). All this plus architecture articles on all the Kingdoms I have worked on. Overall it looks we are booked for the next 2 years.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
266731 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.175833500E09 +++$+++ yes, Kailasanatha and Kailas temple are the same. But yesterday we were discussing about Kasiviswanatha (or Kasivisveshwara) temple and the Kailasanatha (or Kailasa) temple which are different. +++$+++ ::yes, Kailasanatha and Kailas temple are the same. But yesterday we were discussing about Kasiviswanatha (or Kasivisveshwara) temple and the Kailasanatha (or Kailasa) temple which are different.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
266732 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.175833680E09 +++$+++ Dont let the names confuse you. They sound similar to the western reader. +++$+++ ::Dont let the names confuse you. They sound similar to the western reader.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

528876 +++$+++ Barno +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528876 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-26 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.190844060E09 +++$+++ The photo of the Geoff Bodine Gremlin-bodied #99 probably should be removed from the WMT article.  While almost everything Bodine raced has been for pavement racing, that car was a dirt modified that he ran at the Syracuse fairgrounds (and perhaps a special at Orange County, if the pic is from that flickr user's collection).  It's not representative of past or current Tour modifieds.  It would be appropriate if we get a dirt modified article together, though.   +++$+++ The photo of the Geoff Bodine Gremlin-bodied #99 probably should be removed from the WMT article.  While almost everything Bodine raced has been for pavement racing, that car was a dirt modified that he ran at the Syracuse fairgrounds (and perhaps a special at Orange County, if the pic is from that flickr user's collection).  It's not representative of past or current Tour modifieds.  It would be appropriate if we get a dirt modified article together, though.  [[User:Barno|Barno]] 15:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
528877 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528876 +++$+++ 528876 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.190844300E09 +++$+++ Point well taken. The article does talk about how the dirt and pavement car have diverged. I have uploaded the dirt modified cars of several drivers who later became notable.  +++$+++ :Point well taken. The article does talk about how the dirt and pavement car have diverged. I have uploaded the dirt modified cars of several drivers who later became notable. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 15:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
528878 +++$+++ Barno +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528876 +++$+++ 528877 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.190873700E09 +++$+++ Strong thanks.  While those don't fit the WMT article, they would be interesting additions to the early-career sections of the drivers' bio articles.  Some (especially the Kenny Weld\/Gary Balough 112 \"Batmobile\") would be helpful in illustrating a dirt modified article.  Growing up in Wisconsin, did you have only IMCA-type dirt modifieds?  Stock frames, claimer engines, ten-inch tires, $300 to win in the 1980s?  I grew up on real northeastern dirt modifieds: Chevy big-block, a huge carb with no restrictor plate, and a ton of tire stagger, $1200 to win in the 1980s.  Much more weight transfer entering a corner than an asphalt mod.  There are still 25 or 30 dirt tracks in NY and a similar number in PA.  There were a lot more in 1967 when I was age 3 in the Glen Aubrey Speedway and Ithaca-Dryden Speedway stands while my father did handicapping or scoring.   +++$+++ ::Strong thanks.  While those don't fit the WMT article, they would be interesting additions to the early-career sections of the drivers' bio articles.  Some (especially the Kenny Weld/Gary Balough 112 "Batmobile") would be helpful in illustrating a dirt modified article.  Growing up in Wisconsin, did you have only IMCA-type dirt modifieds?  Stock frames, claimer engines, ten-inch tires, $300 to win in the 1980s?  I grew up on real northeastern dirt modifieds: Chevy big-block, a huge carb with no restrictor plate, and a ton of tire stagger, $1200 to win in the 1980s.  Much more weight transfer entering a corner than an asphalt mod.  There are still 25 or 30 dirt tracks in NY and a similar number in PA.  There were a lot more in 1967 when I was age 3 in the Glen Aubrey Speedway and Ithaca-Dryden Speedway stands while my father did handicapping or scoring.  [[User:Barno|Barno]] 23:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
528879 +++$+++ Barno +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528876 +++$+++ 528878 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.190875200E09 +++$+++ I see the Batmobile isn't one of those uploaded by your bot.  I must have seen it when I followed your link to the flickr page.  (Could you check whether that image is CC-by-SA licensed?  If so, it would help the project.)  I saw a couple of the nine cars in the Wikicommons category in person, and the rest in weekly tradepapers.  I also saw some of those drivers in other cars.  Should we add a separate section to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject NASCAR\/Organization]] for wikicommons' NASCAR category?  It would need text making clear that it's '''not''' part of Wikipedia but '''is''' part of the Wikimedia galactic empire.  +++$+++ :::I see the Batmobile isn't one of those uploaded by your bot.  I must have seen it when I followed your link to the flickr page.  (Could you check whether that image is CC-by-SA licensed?  If so, it would help the project.)  I saw a couple of the nine cars in the Wikicommons category in person, and the rest in weekly tradepapers.  I also saw some of those drivers in other cars.  Should we add a separate section to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject NASCAR/Organization]] for wikicommons' NASCAR category?  It would need text making clear that it's '''not''' part of Wikipedia but '''is''' part of the Wikimedia galactic empire. [[User:Barno|Barno]] 23:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
528880 +++$+++ Barno +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528876 +++$+++ 528879 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.190875740E09 +++$+++ Maybe the \/Organization subpage isn't the right place for that, since the Wikicommons category isn't in WPN's scope.  But it would be nice to have it somewhere in the project's listed resources.  A similar thing for WikiProject Motorsport's listings to connect to the \"racing cars\" category or whatever wikicommons has for that.  +++$+++ ::::Maybe the /Organization subpage isn't the right place for that, since the Wikicommons category isn't in WPN's scope.  But it would be nice to have it somewhere in the project's listed resources.  A similar thing for WikiProject Motorsport's listings to connect to the "racing cars" category or whatever wikicommons has for that. [[User:Barno|Barno]] 23:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
528881 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528876 +++$+++ 528880 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.190884860E09 +++$+++ I like the idea about linking WikiProject NASCAR to the Commons categories. I'll bring up managing all racecar categories on Commons at WP:MOTOR - it's another great idea. Also, I tell the bot what images to upload through a web interface.  +++$+++ :::::I like the idea about linking WikiProject NASCAR to the Commons categories. I'll bring up managing all racecar categories on Commons at WP:MOTOR - it's another great idea. Also, I tell the bot what images to upload through a web interface. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 02:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
528882 +++$+++ Barno +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528876 +++$+++ 528876 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.191035880E09 +++$+++ I looked through us44mt's photo archive on flickr that you mentioned, and identified a couple that would be valuable to us.  [[Mike McLaughlin]]'s modified (1979 or 1980) is at[http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/55173627@N00\/838291026\/in\/set-72157600871492951\/].  The \"Batmobile\" that Gary Balough drove at Syracuse, the first dirt modified with ground effects more sophisticated than a roof wing, is at [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/55173627@N00\/837906384\/in\/set-72157600871492951\/].  Eventually we might consider photos for Kenny Brightbill, Jimmy Horton (you already got the red 3 onto Wikicommons), and maybe Jack Johnson, as they're notable enough for WP bio articles.  +++$+++ *I looked through us44mt's photo archive on flickr that you mentioned, and identified a couple that would be valuable to us.  [[Mike McLaughlin]]'s modified (1979 or 1980) is at[http://www.flickr.com/photos/55173627@N00/838291026/in/set-72157600871492951/].  The "Batmobile" that Gary Balough drove at Syracuse, the first dirt modified with ground effects more sophisticated than a roof wing, is at [http://www.flickr.com/photos/55173627@N00/837906384/in/set-72157600871492951/].  Eventually we might consider photos for Kenny Brightbill, Jimmy Horton (you already got the red 3 onto Wikicommons), and maybe Jack Johnson, as they're notable enough for WP bio articles. [[User:Barno|Barno]] 20:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
528883 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528876 +++$+++ 528876 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.191068880E09 +++$+++ I started the [[Jimmy Horton]] article since I had 2 images. I easily remember him from his Cup and ARCA days, and I felt he needed an article despite no Top 10 NASCAR finishes. He was around long enough, plus he did a lot with his modified. I requested that the author change the licensing on the Magic Shoes and Batmobile photos.  +++$+++ :I started the [[Jimmy Horton]] article since I had 2 images. I easily remember him from his Cup and ARCA days, and I felt he needed an article despite no Top 10 NASCAR finishes. He was around long enough, plus he did a lot with his modified. I requested that the author change the licensing on the Magic Shoes and Batmobile photos. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 05:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
528884 +++$+++ Barno +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528876 +++$+++ 528883 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.191364380E09 +++$+++ Thanks; good start on Horton.  I'll try to find ''Stock Car Racing'' feature articles; I believe there are at least a couple.  If so I'll add citations and details.  +++$+++ ::Thanks; good start on Horton.  I'll try to find ''Stock Car Racing'' feature articles; I believe there are at least a couple.  If so I'll add citations and details. [[User:Barno|Barno]] 15:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

266733 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.175834580E09 +++$+++ Hows that for a plan? +++$+++ Hows that for a plan?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
266734 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266733 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.175835180E09 +++$+++ You have mail. +++$+++ ::You have mail.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

266735 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.175843760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
266736 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266735 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.175845560E09 +++$+++ Was this a DYK at one point? +++$+++ ::Was this a DYK at one point?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
266737 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266735 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.175847540E09 +++$+++ If it was not, may be you should nominate it. (if you have significantly expanded it or altered it in the last 5 days). One way to do that is to add info on some of the topics there lie Badami caves, or Mahaballipuram temples etc. +++$+++ ::If it was not, may be you should nominate it. (if you have significantly expanded it or altered it in the last 5 days). One way to do that is to add info on some of the topics there lie Badami caves, or Mahaballipuram temples etc.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
266738 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266735 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.175849160E09 +++$+++ I am confident you are going to find plenty (to put it lightly) of opportunity to explore and widen your wisdom by the time we are done with all the FA's. These FA's usually crop up topics that '''will''' interest you from your own angle too. +++$+++ ::I am confident you are going to find plenty (to put it lightly) of opportunity to explore and widen your wisdom by the time we are done with all the FA's. These FA's usually crop up topics that '''will''' interest you from your own angle too.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

4593 +++$+++ D.M.N. +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-21 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.232583660E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:D.M.N.\/Sandbox&curid=12260363&diff=265454899&oldid=265329951] I knew it started somewhere around the 50's\/60's but didn't know the exact year! Hopefully I'll be able to set up the transformation in the Wiki-space within the next few days. ;-)  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:D.M.N./Sandbox&curid=12260363&diff=265454899&oldid=265329951] I knew it started somewhere around the 50's/60's but didn't know the exact year! Hopefully I'll be able to set up the transformation in the Wiki-space within the next few days. ;-) [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 16:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
4594 +++$+++ D.M.N. +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4593 +++$+++ 4593 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.232663520E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that sounds better. Thanks. =)  +++$+++ :Yeah, that sounds better. Thanks. =) [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 14:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
4595 +++$+++ D.M.N. +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4593 +++$+++ 4594 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.232663940E09 +++$+++ Just thinking... for books like Forza Minardi, would they go under Biography, as its like a biography of the Minardi team.  +++$+++ ::Just thinking... for books like Forza Minardi, would they go under Biography, as its like a biography of the Minardi team. [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 14:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
4596 +++$+++ D.M.N. +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4593 +++$+++ 4594 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.232664600E09 +++$+++ Good point. I'll probably make a General F1 section then for books of that type then.  +++$+++ ::Good point. I'll probably make a General F1 section then for books of that type then. [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 14:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

266739 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.175907360E09 +++$+++ to understand and tempting to write about (once I receive images from Nikhil Varma - Temple in Bagali). +++$+++ to understand and tempting to write about (once I receive images from Nikhil Varma - Temple in Bagali).[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
266740 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266739 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.175920920E09 +++$+++ When is your trip. By the time you get back I can have significant work done and ready for close examination. +++$+++ ::When is your trip. By the time you get back I can have significant work done and ready for close examination.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
266741 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266739 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.175925840E09 +++$+++ You are not planning on leaving wiki , are you? +++$+++ ::You are not planning on leaving wiki , are you?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
266742 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266739 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.175926140E09 +++$+++ I am glad. +++$+++ ::I am glad.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
266743 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266739 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.175926620E09 +++$+++ Outside wiki, they are in my CD's and albums. Inside wiki they are in GDFL self made images section. Look at the Keladi Nayaka page or Shimoga district page. Is that is what you mean by horse shoe arch window? +++$+++ ::Outside wiki, they are in my CD's and albums. Inside wiki they are in GDFL self made images section. Look at the Keladi Nayaka page or Shimoga district page. Is that is what you mean by horse shoe arch window?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
266744 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266739 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.175927100E09 +++$+++ Created [[Political history of medieval Karnataka]]. Dont delete BoxD yet. +++$+++ ::Created [[Political history of medieval Karnataka]]. Dont delete BoxD yet.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
266745 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266739 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.175935320E09 +++$+++ Drive with regards to? +++$+++ ::Drive with regards to?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
266746 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266739 +++$+++ 266739 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.175975040E09 +++$+++ ;You have email, unless you already read it. +++$+++ :;You have email, unless you already read it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 12:44, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

4597 +++$+++ D.M.N. +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-22 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.232676840E09 +++$+++ I've adjusted the table for the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport\/Library\/Autosport\/1963|1963]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport\/Library\/Autosport\/1964|'64]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport\/Library\/Autosport\/1965|'65]] Autosport years so that match the changes you made to '61 and '62. Could you fill out the Date and Details section when you have a spare minute? Thanks.  +++$+++ I've adjusted the table for the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport/Library/Autosport/1963|1963]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport/Library/Autosport/1964|'64]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport/Library/Autosport/1965|'65]] Autosport years so that match the changes you made to '61 and '62. Could you fill out the Date and Details section when you have a spare minute? Thanks. [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 18:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
4598 +++$+++ D.M.N. +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4597 +++$+++ 4597 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.232677020E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 18:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

528886 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528886 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-30 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.191216780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments at the BT19 FAC - I'm not really all that fussed one way or the other, but I thought it striking that three editors independently felt that the term was unusual, and that they were all from the States. I will try and provide some useful comment in answer to your thoughts on Alan Kulwicki as well, but it might take me a little while (sorry!).  +++$+++ Thanks for your comments at the BT19 FAC - I'm not really all that fussed one way or the other, but I thought it striking that three editors independently felt that the term was unusual, and that they were all from the States. I will try and provide some useful comment in answer to your thoughts on Alan Kulwicki as well, but it might take me a little while (sorry!). [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] 22:33, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
528887 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528886 +++$+++ 528886 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.191233460E09 +++$+++ I appreciate whatever you are willing and\/or able to contribute. You have bigger things going on right now, and I'm not done anyhow. I'll ask for a peer review, and note the peer review request at WP:MOTOR.  +++$+++ :I appreciate whatever you are willing and/or able to contribute. You have bigger things going on right now, and I'm not done anyhow. I'll ask for a peer review, and note the peer review request at WP:MOTOR. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 03:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

4599 +++$+++ D.M.N. +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-26 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.233025380E09 +++$+++ If it's a page which normally gets moderate\/high traffic, then I normally would (say for instance if I wanted to reference a current F1 article, I'd probably edit it in my sandbox, then paste it into the mainspace), but with the 1995 ones, I don't really see much point of it as I'm unlikely to be edit conflicted, plus others can actively add info to it when its in the mainspace.  +++$+++ If it's a page which normally gets moderate/high traffic, then I normally would (say for instance if I wanted to reference a current F1 article, I'd probably edit it in my sandbox, then paste it into the mainspace), but with the 1995 ones, I don't really see much point of it as I'm unlikely to be edit conflicted, plus others can actively add info to it when its in the mainspace. [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 19:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
4600 +++$+++ D.M.N. +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4599 +++$+++ 4599 +++$+++ 2009-01-30 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.233360240E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that would be fitting. I think at the moment the aim with an article like that when he was in him prime 80 years ago, a GA would be quite possible. Not sure whether FA would be possible though... depends what sources are out there on him.  +++$+++ :Yeah, that would be fitting. I think at the moment the aim with an article like that when he was in him prime 80 years ago, a GA would be quite possible. Not sure whether FA would be possible though... depends what sources are out there on him. [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 16:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

528893 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-16 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.192564800E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> self awarded because the entire group was missed, so I awarded everyone including myself -- +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> self awarded because the entire group was missed, so I awarded everyone including myself --[[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 13:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
528894 +++$+++ Tmaull +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528893 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-16 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.192574220E09 +++$+++ Sweet -  +++$+++ ::Sweet - [[User:Tmaull|Tmaull]] 15:37, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

266750 +++$+++ The Thadman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266750 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-08 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.176076320E09 +++$+++ Mattise, I don't think An\/I is a way to go I recomend MEDCAB or simply asking Steve to close your case.  Sometimes it is better to walk away from it. <font color=\"SteelBlue\">[[User:Aeon1006|\xc6on]]<\/font> <font color=\"red\"><sup>[[User talk:Aeon1006|Insanity Now!]]<\/sup><\/font> <font color=\"green\"><sub> +++$+++ Mattise, I don't think An/I is a way to go I recomend MEDCAB or simply asking Steve to close your case.  Sometimes it is better to walk away from it. <font color="SteelBlue">[[User:Aeon1006|Æon]]</font> <font color="red"><sup>[[User talk:Aeon1006|Insanity Now!]]</sup></font> <font color="green"><sub>[[User:The Thadman/Give Back Our Membership|Give Back Our Membership!]]</sub></font> 16:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
266751 +++$+++ The_Thadman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266750 +++$+++ 266750 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.176067620E09 +++$+++ Matisse, it is considered '''[[WP:HARASS|harassment]]''' to post a warning template in response to a request to stop certain behaviors. Please produce these personal attacks or remove this template.  <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|\u05d0\u05de\u05e8]]<\/small> <tt><b><font color=\"#0033CC\">[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso]]<\/font><\/b><\/tt> <sub><B><font color=\"#000000\">([[User:The_Thadman\/Desk|desk]]\/[[WP:AMA|AMA]])<\/font><\/B><\/sub> \u2022 '''<font color=\"#CC0000\"> +++$+++ :Matisse, it is considered '''[[WP:HARASS|harassment]]''' to post a warning template in response to a request to stop certain behaviors. Please produce these personal attacks or remove this template.  <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|אמר]]</small> <tt><b><font color="#0033CC">[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso]]</font></b></tt> <sub><B><font color="#000000">([[User:The_Thadman/Desk|desk]]/[[WP:AMA|AMA]])</font></B></sub> • '''<font color="#CC0000">[[User:The_Thadman/Give_Back_Our_Membership|Give Back Our Membership!]]</font>''' 14:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
266752 +++$+++ The_Thadman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266750 +++$+++ 266750 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.176069840E09 +++$+++ I will assume that any such communication is a violation of this request and will constitute harassment. Thank you. <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|\u05d0\u05de\u05e8]]<\/small> <tt><b><font color=\"#0033CC\">[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso]]<\/font><\/b><\/tt> <sub><B><font color=\"#000000\">([[User:The_Thadman\/Desk|desk]]\/[[WP:AMA|AMA]])<\/font><\/B><\/sub> \u2022 '''<font color=\"#CC0000\"> +++$+++ :I will assume that any such communication is a violation of this request and will constitute harassment. Thank you. <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|אמר]]</small> <tt><b><font color="#0033CC">[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso]]</font></b></tt> <sub><B><font color="#000000">([[User:The_Thadman/Desk|desk]]/[[WP:AMA|AMA]])</font></B></sub> • '''<font color="#CC0000">[[User:The_Thadman/Give_Back_Our_Membership|Give Back Our Membership!]]</font>''' 15:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

528895 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-19 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.192786080E09 +++$+++ I expanded the article. I saw no evidence of him racing, so I move him from [[:Category:NASCAR drivers]] to [[:Category:NASCAR people]]. If this is incorrect, then please cite that he has raced in NASCAR at any level and revert my change. Otherwise, you could leave a message on the article's talk page - it's on my watchlist. Cheers!  +++$+++ I expanded the article. I saw no evidence of him racing, so I move him from [[:Category:NASCAR drivers]] to [[:Category:NASCAR people]]. If this is incorrect, then please cite that he has raced in NASCAR at any level and revert my change. Otherwise, you could leave a message on the article's talk page - it's on my watchlist. Cheers! [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 02:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
528896 +++$+++ Alansohn +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528895 +++$+++ 528895 +++$+++ 2007-10-19 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.192792740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the catch and for all of teh additions you made to the article!  +++$+++ *Thanks for the catch and for all of teh additions you made to the article! [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] 04:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
528897 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528895 +++$+++ 528896 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.193197980E09 +++$+++ Thank for for listing the article in the DYK section! I had no idea that it was suggested. I would have added a wikilink to the hook, but it's a minor matter.  +++$+++ **Thank for for listing the article in the DYK section! I had no idea that it was suggested. I would have added a wikilink to the hook, but it's a minor matter. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 20:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
528898 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528895 +++$+++ 528895 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.193198160E09 +++$+++ Thank for for listing the article in the DYK section! I had no idea that it was suggested. I would have added a wikilink to the hook, but it's a minor matter. I feel like I made major contributions to the article, so I'm adding it to my DYK infobox total as a \"major contribution\". It turned out well! I'm curious why you decided to start the article.  +++$+++ *Thank for for listing the article in the DYK section! I had no idea that it was suggested. I would have added a wikilink to the hook, but it's a minor matter. I feel like I made major contributions to the article, so I'm adding it to my DYK infobox total as a "major contribution". It turned out well! I'm curious why you decided to start the article. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 20:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

4611 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-30 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.246387740E09 +++$+++ Hi. I've been looking at doing an expansion on Rudi's page for a bit, to see if we could get it on the main page for the 50th anniversary of his death (the 28th of September this year). I've been doing a fair amount of research - I've read his autobiography (very interesting), and have been looking through some of my other books, and have collected what appear to be useful and [[WP:RS|reliable]] (most of them) websites [[User:Apterygial\/Sandbox 5|here]]. Looking through the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport\/Library|motorsports library]], it looks like you have some books which might be useful. Once I saw that you started Rudi's page (and might have some interest in the subject) I wondered whether you would like to have a collaboration on the article, or if not, tell me if you have anything interesting on him. :) Thanks, <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ Hi. I've been looking at doing an expansion on Rudi's page for a bit, to see if we could get it on the main page for the 50th anniversary of his death (the 28th of September this year). I've been doing a fair amount of research - I've read his autobiography (very interesting), and have been looking through some of my other books, and have collected what appear to be useful and [[WP:RS|reliable]] (most of them) websites [[User:Apterygial/Sandbox 5|here]]. Looking through the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport/Library|motorsports library]], it looks like you have some books which might be useful. Once I saw that you started Rudi's page (and might have some interest in the subject) I wondered whether you would like to have a collaboration on the article, or if not, tell me if you have anything interesting on him. :) Thanks, <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 11:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
4612 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4611 +++$+++ 4611 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.246468380E09 +++$+++ Great! I didn't check the whole history of the page, which explains why I didn't catch all those other editors. The research I've been doing hasn't been able to turn up much of his career from 1926 to 1930, so that DVD could certainly be very useful (as well as the rest of his career). I'm off to my [[State Library of South Australia|state library]] on Friday to look through their books, and I'll probably start on the article this weekend. <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ :Great! I didn't check the whole history of the page, which explains why I didn't catch all those other editors. The research I've been doing hasn't been able to turn up much of his career from 1926 to 1930, so that DVD could certainly be very useful (as well as the rest of his career). I'm off to my [[State Library of South Australia|state library]] on Friday to look through their books, and I'll probably start on the article this weekend. <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 10:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
4613 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4611 +++$+++ 4612 +++$+++ 2009-07-03 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.246628520E09 +++$+++ I've started working on the article in [[User:Apterygial\/Sandbox 2|my sandbox]], if you wanted to add some stuff. <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ ::I've started working on the article in [[User:Apterygial/Sandbox 2|my sandbox]], if you wanted to add some stuff. <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 06:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
4614 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4611 +++$+++ 4613 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.248516360E09 +++$+++ Sure. If you get a mo, could you add a bit about RC's donation of trophies to the Indy 500 museum to the ''Legacy'' section? Thanks. <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ :::Sure. If you get a mo, could you add a bit about RC's donation of trophies to the Indy 500 museum to the ''Legacy'' section? Thanks. <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 03:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

266756 +++$+++ The_Thadman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-08 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.176093540E09 +++$+++ Will you accept this small token as a gesture of peace? <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|\u05d0\u05de\u05e8]]<\/small> <tt><b><font color=\"#0033CC\">[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso]]<\/font><\/b><\/tt> <sub><B><font color=\"#000000\">([[User:The_Thadman\/Desk|desk]]\/[[WP:AMA|AMA]])<\/font><\/B><\/sub> \u2022 '''<font color=\"#CC0000\"> +++$+++ Will you accept this small token as a gesture of peace? <small>[[User_talk:The_Thadman|אמר]]</small> <tt><b><font color="#0033CC">[[User:The_Thadman|Steve Caruso]]</font></b></tt> <sub><B><font color="#000000">([[User:The_Thadman/Desk|desk]]/[[WP:AMA|AMA]])</font></B></sub> • '''<font color="#CC0000">[[User:The_Thadman/Give_Back_Our_Membership|Give Back Our Membership!]]</font>''' 21:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
266757 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266756 +++$+++ 266756 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.176093720E09 +++$+++ Oh Mattise, please don't make a battle out of this. Please, please just drop the whole thing. Things will spiral out of control like they did last time. Only this time you'll end up the worse for it. People make mistakes, it happens. Read [[WP:POINT]] which you are falling foul of. Set your reputation by the good work on articles and not by the arguments you get involved with. -- +++$+++ :Oh Mattise, please don't make a battle out of this. Please, please just drop the whole thing. Things will spiral out of control like they did last time. Only this time you'll end up the worse for it. People make mistakes, it happens. Read [[WP:POINT]] which you are falling foul of. Set your reputation by the good work on articles and not by the arguments you get involved with. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 21:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

266758 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266758 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-09 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.176151920E09 +++$+++ you made w.r.t. alphebetical reordering and the current version, you will see what happened. I added three more references (Majumdar, Jain and De Bryne) to the list. In doing so, I forgot that you had rearranged the references per alpha order and I realised I had spoilt the order by mistake. So I rearranged again the way you had done it, only this time I added the three new refernces for citations #54,56,57 ( i think) in alpha order. I know you are going thru a stressful time for reasons I dont fully underatand, but I dont hold your last message against you. Please calm down!!:) +++$+++ you made w.r.t. alphebetical reordering and the current version, you will see what happened. I added three more references (Majumdar, Jain and De Bryne) to the list. In doing so, I forgot that you had rearranged the references per alpha order and I realised I had spoilt the order by mistake. So I rearranged again the way you had done it, only this time I added the three new refernces for citations #54,56,57 ( i think) in alpha order. I know you are going thru a stressful time for reasons I dont fully underatand, but I dont hold your last message against you. Please calm down!!:)[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 13:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
266759 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266758 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.176163980E09 +++$+++ Dont worry!! no apologies needed. I have explained that earlier. +++$+++ ::Dont worry!! no apologies needed. I have explained that earlier.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 17:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

266760 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266760 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-09 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.176164880E09 +++$+++ Yes, I would be happy to be your advocate. In fact, since Steve posted recently that he was looking for someone to take on the case, I've already contacted him and asked his permission to take the case. So I'm just waiting for him to receive my posting and formally hand the case over to me. In the meantime, I'll read through the pages and archives associated with the dispute. Since this is a unique situation, as the original dispute has already been the subject of an ArbCom verdict (which supersedes any AMA actions), I'm not sure how much I can do in terms of dispute resolution, but I'll do everything I can. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Yes, I would be happy to be your advocate. In fact, since Steve posted recently that he was looking for someone to take on the case, I've already contacted him and asked his permission to take the case. So I'm just waiting for him to receive my posting and formally hand the case over to me. In the meantime, I'll read through the pages and archives associated with the dispute. Since this is a unique situation, as the original dispute has already been the subject of an ArbCom verdict (which supersedes any AMA actions), I'm not sure how much I can do in terms of dispute resolution, but I'll do everything I can. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 17:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
266761 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266760 +++$+++ 266760 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.176251880E09 +++$+++ Steve doesn't seem to have replied to my posting yet. However, I can certainly give you informal advice about how to deal with the matter, and answer any questions you may have. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Steve doesn't seem to have replied to my posting yet. However, I can certainly give you informal advice about how to deal with the matter, and answer any questions you may have. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 17:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
266762 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266760 +++$+++ 266761 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.176259380E09 +++$+++ Update - Steve has now officially passed your case over to me. So I'm here to help with anything you need. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Update - Steve has now officially passed your case over to me. So I'm here to help with anything you need. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 19:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
266763 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266760 +++$+++ 266762 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.176339900E09 +++$+++ OK, who is the sockpuppet in question? <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::OK, who is the sockpuppet in question? <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 18:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

528906 +++$+++ Falconus +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-26 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.193453280E09 +++$+++ Thanks much, <font color=\"009900\"><b>Falconus<\/b><\/font><sup> +++$+++ Thanks much, <font color="009900"><b>Falconus</b></font><sup>[[User:Falconus|<font color="000000"><b>p</b></font>]] [[User talk:Falconus|<font color="000000"><b>t</b></font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Falconus|<font color="000000"><b>c</b></font>]]</sup> 19:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
528907 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528906 +++$+++ 528906 +++$+++ 2007-10-26 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.193468100E09 +++$+++ The problem is that you are using both user and template namespace. I meant that you should use the user namespace, meaning it starts with User:.  So I meant you should call it [[User:Falconus\/Sandbox]].  +++$+++ :The problem is that you are using both user and template namespace. I meant that you should use the user namespace, meaning it starts with User:.  So I meant you should call it [[User:Falconus/Sandbox]]. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 23:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
528908 +++$+++ Falconus +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528906 +++$+++ 528907 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.193471400E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks.  I didn't realize that you could call that as a template.--<font color=\"009900\"><b>Falconus<\/b><\/font><sup> +++$+++ ::Okay, thanks.  I didn't realize that you could call that as a template.--<font color="009900"><b>Falconus</b></font><sup>[[User:Falconus|<font color="000000"><b>p</b></font>]] [[User talk:Falconus|<font color="000000"><b>t</b></font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Falconus|<font color="000000"><b>c</b></font>]]</sup> 00:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
528909 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528906 +++$+++ 528908 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.193476020E09 +++$+++ You can use a sandbox to create a template, I've seen others do it this way before. Let me know if you need more help, I'll do my best to help you.  +++$+++ :::You can use a sandbox to create a template, I've seen others do it this way before. Let me know if you need more help, I'll do my best to help you. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 02:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
528910 +++$+++ Falconus +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528906 +++$+++ 528909 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.193479440E09 +++$+++ Awesome!  Thanks; I'll have to give that a try when I get a chance. --<font color=\"009900\"><b>Falconus<\/b><\/font><sup> +++$+++ ::::Awesome!  Thanks; I'll have to give that a try when I get a chance. --<font color="009900"><b>Falconus</b></font><sup>[[User:Falconus|<font color="000000"><b>p</b></font>]] [[User talk:Falconus|<font color="000000"><b>t</b></font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Falconus|<font color="000000"><b>c</b></font>]]</sup> 03:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
528911 +++$+++ Falconus +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528906 +++$+++ 528910 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.193536980E09 +++$+++ That seems to work.  Thank you! --<font color=\"009900\"><b>Falconus<\/b><\/font><sup> +++$+++ :::::That seems to work.  Thank you! --<font color="009900"><b>Falconus</b></font><sup>[[User:Falconus|<font color="000000"><b>p</b></font>]] [[User talk:Falconus|<font color="000000"><b>t</b></font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Falconus|<font color="000000"><b>c</b></font>]]</sup> 19:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

266764 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.176343800E09 +++$+++ I'm not completely sure of the situation here, but it looks like Aeon has contacted you below on behalf of his advocee, [[User:Jefferson Anderson|Jefferson Anderson]], concerning the conflict between you and this user. I don't know the background, but judging from his talkpage this user has a history of getting into conflict. If you have any further problems with this user, I'll contact Aeon and ask him to have a word with his advocee. My advice to you is to disengage from the whole thing, and try not to worry about this user; as I say, just contact me if there are any further problems with him. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ I'm not completely sure of the situation here, but it looks like Aeon has contacted you below on behalf of his advocee, [[User:Jefferson Anderson|Jefferson Anderson]], concerning the conflict between you and this user. I don't know the background, but judging from his talkpage this user has a history of getting into conflict. If you have any further problems with this user, I'll contact Aeon and ask him to have a word with his advocee. My advice to you is to disengage from the whole thing, and try not to worry about this user; as I say, just contact me if there are any further problems with him. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 19:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
266765 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266764 +++$+++ 266764 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.176344880E09 +++$+++ That's OK, no problem. Glad to be helpful. :) <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :That's OK, no problem. Glad to be helpful. :) <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 19:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

4621 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-20 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.258789560E09 +++$+++ It's a tricky one. Lang was declared Champion, but whether he deserved to be is a different matter. We could include his name in the template and add a ''(disputed)'' after his name. (I choked a little when I saw Rosemeyer's name there...) <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ It's a tricky one. Lang was declared Champion, but whether he deserved to be is a different matter. We could include his name in the template and add a ''(disputed)'' after his name. (I choked a little when I saw Rosemeyer's name there...) <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 23:46, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
4622 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Readro +++$+++ 4621 +++$+++ 4621 +++$+++ 2009-11-20 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.258790280E09 +++$+++ That's probably the best way of going about it (we'd probably have to remove both names from [[Template:European Grand Prix Drivers' Champions]]). Damn those meddling Nazis... <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ :That's probably the best way of going about it (we'd probably have to remove both names from [[Template:European Grand Prix Drivers' Champions]]). Damn those meddling Nazis... <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 23:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

266766 +++$+++ The Thadman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.176343140E09 +++$+++ Also Jefferson is requesting that you cease attacks on him I will be reviewing his last edits and yours to ensure that this is a valid complaint.  If it is you need to cease, if he is at fault I will inform him and direct him to the polices in question. <font color=\"SteelBlue\">[[User:Aeon1006|\xc6on]]<\/font> <font color=\"red\"><sup>[[User talk:Aeon1006|Insanity Now!]]<\/sup><\/font> <font color=\"green\"><sub> +++$+++ Also Jefferson is requesting that you cease attacks on him I will be reviewing his last edits and yours to ensure that this is a valid complaint.  If it is you need to cease, if he is at fault I will inform him and direct him to the polices in question. <font color="SteelBlue">[[User:Aeon1006|Æon]]</font> <font color="red"><sup>[[User talk:Aeon1006|Insanity Now!]]</sup></font> <font color="green"><sub>[[User:The Thadman/Give Back Our Membership|Give Back Our Membership!]]</sub></font> 18:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
266767 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266766 +++$+++ 266766 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.176345600E09 +++$+++ I agree that disengaging seems to be the best cause of action. Things are like a tinder box which only the slightest spark can set off. Best not make any more sparks, and keeping quite on the issue in public is the best option. -- +++$+++ :I agree that disengaging seems to be the best cause of action. Things are like a tinder box which only the slightest spark can set off. Best not make any more sparks, and keeping quite on the issue in public is the best option. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 19:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
266768 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266766 +++$+++ 266767 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.176355020E09 +++$+++ Like an entrance porch with steps leading up and parapets on either side? Yes, I may have several tyles actually. I can upload it later tonight. Any particular article? +++$+++ ::Like an entrance porch with steps leading up and parapets on either side? Yes, I may have several tyles actually. I can upload it later tonight. Any particular article?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
266769 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266766 +++$+++ 266767 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.176365640E09 +++$+++ The main difference is Kailasanatha at Ellora was done top down and I think working the normal way, from the ground level up. Artisans may have worked from all anglaes simulteneously. The Pancha Ratha seems to be the usual way, from the outside, carving their way in.I visited Mahaballipuram as a child, I have old black and white pictures (in bad condition) from 1970. +++$+++ ::The main difference is Kailasanatha at Ellora was done top down and I think working the normal way, from the ground level up. Artisans may have worked from all anglaes simulteneously. The Pancha Ratha seems to be the usual way, from the outside, carving their way in.I visited Mahaballipuram as a child, I have old black and white pictures (in bad condition) from 1970.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

480251 +++$+++ Sligocki +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480251 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-04 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.252054920E09 +++$+++ Hi JaGa! I recently asked for help at the Village Pump for getting the number of pages that link to a given page ([[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Counting_the_number_of_articles_that_\"link_here\"]]). Folks there suggested that your [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~jason\/disambig_links.php Toolserver program] as a good starting point. I've looked at your utility and it seems quite appropriate, do you think that you could help me adapt it for my needs? Specifically, I would like an online utility that would count the number of links to any specified page. I am a programmer and have some experience with the API, but your help would be '''extremely''' valuable. Thanks, - +++$+++ Hi JaGa! I recently asked for help at the Village Pump for getting the number of pages that link to a given page ([[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Counting_the_number_of_articles_that_"link_here"]]). Folks there suggested that your [http://toolserver.org/~jason/disambig_links.php Toolserver program] as a good starting point. I've looked at your utility and it seems quite appropriate, do you think that you could help me adapt it for my needs? Specifically, I would like an online utility that would count the number of links to any specified page. I am a programmer and have some experience with the API, but your help would be '''extremely''' valuable. Thanks, -[[User:Sligocki|Sligocki]] ([[User talk:Sligocki|talk]]) 02:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
480252 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480251 +++$+++ 480251 +++$+++ 2009-09-06 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.252286520E09 +++$+++ Well, as I mentioned above, I haven't released my code yet.  Do you have a Toolserver account?  All my stuff is PHP that runs against the toolserver's replicated Wikipedia database; you have to get access to that for my stuff to be of any value. [https:\/\/wiki.toolserver.org\/view\/Account_request This link] should get you started if that's the path you want to take. -- +++$+++ :Well, as I mentioned above, I haven't released my code yet.  Do you have a Toolserver account?  All my stuff is PHP that runs against the toolserver's replicated Wikipedia database; you have to get access to that for my stuff to be of any value. [https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Account_request This link] should get you started if that's the path you want to take. --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 18:22, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

528912 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-27 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.193515860E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil. I was hoping you might be interested in becoming an administrator - I think you have a good range of experience across Wikipedia and would do a great job. If you are, I'd be more than willing to nominate you at [[WP:RFA]]. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil. I was hoping you might be interested in becoming an administrator - I think you have a good range of experience across Wikipedia and would do a great job. If you are, I'd be more than willing to nominate you at [[WP:RFA]]. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 13:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
528913 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528912 +++$+++ 528912 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.193517840E09 +++$+++ Wow, I am shocked. I appreciate the kind gesture, especially in light of my criticism of you on your nomination. Your nomination turned me off to the process, so I'll think about it and let you know if I want to run.  +++$+++ :Wow, I am shocked. I appreciate the kind gesture, especially in light of my criticism of you on your nomination. Your nomination turned me off to the process, so I'll think about it and let you know if I want to run. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 13:44, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
528914 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528912 +++$+++ 528913 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.193518260E09 +++$+++ Well do give it a bit of thought. The process is just one week but you get to use the tools afterwards at any time. You seem to be active in plenty of place where they'd be handy - especially now I see you're getting involved in DYK updates. It always good to have more people who can actually update that. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Well do give it a bit of thought. The process is just one week but you get to use the tools afterwards at any time. You seem to be active in plenty of place where they'd be handy - especially now I see you're getting involved in DYK updates. It always good to have more people who can actually update that. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 13:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
528915 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528912 +++$+++ 528912 +++$+++ 2007-11-01 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.193902380E09 +++$+++ It's one of the best viewpoints in the entire state of Wisconsin. I was happy to help!  +++$+++ :It's one of the best viewpoints in the entire state of Wisconsin. I was happy to help! [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 00:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

266770 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266770 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-12 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.176366960E09 +++$+++ I have put an image of a simple porch in my user page. you may use that if you find it interesting. Else, I will look for something else. +++$+++ I have put an image of a simple porch in my user page. you may use that if you find it interesting. Else, I will look for something else.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
266771 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266770 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.176369300E09 +++$+++ I dont understand \"I am under a uder a warning. Perhaps curtains!\" +++$+++ ::I dont understand "I am under a uder a warning. Perhaps curtains!"[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
266772 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266770 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.176369900E09 +++$+++ Oh, I am talking about the weather,  for once not Wikiedia. Our weatherman committed suicide a week ago for so seemingly no reason, He was a wonderful guy and I was very fond of him and wil miss him greatly.  Another loss. -- +++$+++ :::Oh, I am talking about the weather,  for once not Wikiedia. Our weatherman committed suicide a week ago for so seemingly no reason, He was a wonderful guy and I was very fond of him and wil miss him greatly.  Another loss. --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 02:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
266773 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266770 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.176427380E09 +++$+++ yes, porch to a Mantapa. At some ponit, a DYK, \"porches in South Indian temples\" will be nice. I have one from Kalyani Chalukya, Ganga, Hoysala. +++$+++ ::yes, porch to a Mantapa. At some ponit, a DYK, "porches in South Indian temples" will be nice. I have one from Kalyani Chalukya, Ganga, Hoysala.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

528916 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-04 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.194180120E09 +++$+++ I've restored [[Buffy Waltrip]] - its not a great article but I think it just about asserted notability. It could definitely use expansion\/sourcing though - I leave it in your care. Have you thought some more about my offer? Particularly if there are any questions I can answer or anything else I can say that might help you decide... To be honest, I guess I don't want to think I've played a part in you being unwilling to give it a go. I think you'd be a good choice and I'm hoping you'll say \"yes\" in the end. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ I've restored [[Buffy Waltrip]] - its not a great article but I think it just about asserted notability. It could definitely use expansion/sourcing though - I leave it in your care. Have you thought some more about my offer? Particularly if there are any questions I can answer or anything else I can say that might help you decide... To be honest, I guess I don't want to think I've played a part in you being unwilling to give it a go. I think you'd be a good choice and I'm hoping you'll say "yes" in the end. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 04:42, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
528917 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528916 +++$+++ 528916 +++$+++ 2007-11-04 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.194181680E09 +++$+++ I don't feel that you personally have discouraged me in any way against attempting to become an administrator, but the comments\/threats by some of your zealous advocates in your RFA caused me major wikistress. The incident caused me to stop considering any possibility of an administrator role for myself. I went the route of attempting to improve the quality of articles instead. I have no problems with you in any way, and I appreciate that you find my contributions positive. I have no questions about administrators or their role in Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :I don't feel that you personally have discouraged me in any way against attempting to become an administrator, but the comments/threats by some of your zealous advocates in your RFA caused me major wikistress. The incident caused me to stop considering any possibility of an administrator role for myself. I went the route of attempting to improve the quality of articles instead. I have no problems with you in any way, and I appreciate that you find my contributions positive. I have no questions about administrators or their role in Wikipedia. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 05:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
528918 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528916 +++$+++ 528917 +++$+++ 2007-11-04 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.194182520E09 +++$+++ When I said ''\"The incident caused me to stop considering any possibility of an administrator role for myself.\"'' I meant that I thought that I would have extremely low probability of success - that I would be snowballed. The nomination process is ''extremely'' critical, or at least it was at the time of your successful adminship.  +++$+++ ::When I said ''"The incident caused me to stop considering any possibility of an administrator role for myself."'' I meant that I thought that I would have extremely low probability of success - that I would be snowballed. The nomination process is ''extremely'' critical, or at least it was at the time of your successful adminship. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 05:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
528919 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528916 +++$+++ 528918 +++$+++ 2007-11-04 05:34:00 +++$+++ 1.194183240E09 +++$+++ On the subject of RfA. I don't think you'd snowball at all, far from it - I think you have plenty to offer and are a stronger candidate than many who pass RfA every week. It has been felt lately that there is a lack of admin candidates who have good experience of content writing rather than just vandal reverting and automated processes. As someone who has ongoing experience of the RfA process, I think you'd do well - I won't make any promises I can't keep but I wouldn't have offered to nom you if I didn't think you were highly likely to pass. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::On the subject of RfA. I don't think you'd snowball at all, far from it - I think you have plenty to offer and are a stronger candidate than many who pass RfA every week. It has been felt lately that there is a lack of admin candidates who have good experience of content writing rather than just vandal reverting and automated processes. As someone who has ongoing experience of the RfA process, I think you'd do well - I won't make any promises I can't keep but I wouldn't have offered to nom you if I didn't think you were highly likely to pass. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 05:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

266774 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-12 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.176428400E09 +++$+++ Whenever you have time, please do a thorough copy edit. I have to create a template for \"timeline\". Do you think its ok to  mention literature\/architecture in a few sentences or is that redundant in this topic. We need to chop down some 20% if necessary. +++$+++ Whenever you have time, please do a thorough copy edit. I have to create a template for "timeline". Do you think its ok to  mention literature/architecture in a few sentences or is that redundant in this topic. We need to chop down some 20% if necessary.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
266775 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266774 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.176428820E09 +++$+++ All the topics you have listed (as created by you) add flavor, color and depth to the articles we call FA's. They are important in their own way, but have limitation on depth unless one is an expert in that field. Each and every one of those topics you have created are potential FA's, but we dont have the knowledge to make them. For instance, to create an FA on Kirtimukha, one would have to study them from various building idioms point of view (I only know of Western Chalukya\/Hoysala kirtimukhas) which may require travel across the subcontinent and reading several related books.You will have plenty of opportunity for more such topics. In fact some of those can be combined to for a DYK such as \"decorative practices in India temple architecture\" (just a name I pulled from my ear) +++$+++ ::All the topics you have listed (as created by you) add flavor, color and depth to the articles we call FA's. They are important in their own way, but have limitation on depth unless one is an expert in that field. Each and every one of those topics you have created are potential FA's, but we dont have the knowledge to make them. For instance, to create an FA on Kirtimukha, one would have to study them from various building idioms point of view (I only know of Western Chalukya/Hoysala kirtimukhas) which may require travel across the subcontinent and reading several related books.You will have plenty of opportunity for more such topics. In fact some of those can be combined to for a DYK such as "decorative practices in India temple architecture" (just a name I pulled from my ear)[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
266776 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266774 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.176428940E09 +++$+++ Another DYK would be \"Temple tanks of South India\" (extended to Temple tanks of India if we have images). +++$+++ ::Another DYK would be "Temple tanks of South India" (extended to Temple tanks of India if we have images).[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

612441 +++$+++ Cognita +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.163841780E09 +++$+++ Among the measures you described, it sounds as if the next thing to try is option-command-start and rebuild the desktop. Does rebuilding the desktop mean I'd get a blank and have to restore all the icons?  +++$+++ Among the measures you described, it sounds as if the next thing to try is option-command-start and rebuild the desktop. Does rebuilding the desktop mean I'd get a blank and have to restore all the icons? [[User:Cognita|Cognita]] 01:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
612442 +++$+++ Cognita +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612441 +++$+++ 612441 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.163860080E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your help.  +++$+++ :Thanks again for your help. [[User:Cognita|Cognita]] 06:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

262916 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-03 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.209876720E09 +++$+++ Dear Colin, as I'm sure you know, KD has been in the news (Radio 4) today. Have you seen the ? Lancet paper yet? Graham.  +++$+++ Dear Colin, as I'm sure you know, KD has been in the news (Radio 4) today. Have you seen the ? Lancet paper yet? Graham. [[User:GrahamColm|Graham<font color="red">Colm</font>]][[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
262917 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262916 +++$+++ 262916 +++$+++ 2008-05-05 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.210025400E09 +++$+++ Graham got there before me. {{DOI|10.1016\/S1474-4422(08)70092-9}} - it's going to ''Lancet Neurology''.  +++$+++ :Graham got there before me. {{DOI|10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70092-9}} - it's going to ''Lancet Neurology''. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 15:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
262918 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262916 +++$+++ 262916 +++$+++ 2008-05-05 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.210025820E09 +++$+++ I give up. {{User|Snipergirl}} already added it to the article!  +++$+++ :I give up. {{User|Snipergirl}} already added it to the article! [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 15:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

528922 +++$+++ Coren +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528922 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-10 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.194703200E09 +++$+++ Most excellent job salvaging that copyvio into a good article!  Kudos!  &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ Most excellent job salvaging that copyvio into a good article!  Kudos!  &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 06:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
528923 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528922 +++$+++ 528922 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.194703560E09 +++$+++ Thanks! It was an article waiting to be written. I was checked the [[User:AlexNewArtBot\/NASCARSearchResult|AlexNewArtBot NASCAR list]] when I noticed that the article was up for speedy deletion as copyvio, so I rewrote.  +++$+++ :Thanks! It was an article waiting to be written. I was checked the [[User:AlexNewArtBot/NASCARSearchResult|AlexNewArtBot NASCAR list]] when I noticed that the article was up for speedy deletion as copyvio, so I rewrote. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 06:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

568751 +++$+++ Grgcox +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.156913520E09 +++$+++ Thank you for deleting that page. I thought that deleting all the contents of a page would do the same as deleting it... my misunderstanding.  +++$+++ Thank you for deleting that page. I thought that deleting all the contents of a page would do the same as deleting it... my misunderstanding. [[User:Grgcox|Grgcox]] 21:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
568752 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568751 +++$+++ 568751 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.156913700E09 +++$+++ No, only admins and bureaucrats can delete pages.  You can tag a page that you have created as {{tl|db-author}} in order to delete it if you want to. <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :No, only admins and bureaucrats can delete pages.  You can tag a page that you have created as {{tl|db-author}} in order to delete it if you want to. <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''&nbsp;&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]] </span> 21:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
568753 +++$+++ Grgcox +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568751 +++$+++ 568752 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.156914060E09 +++$+++ Thank you again for the information. I imagine I should be careful about what I create.  +++$+++ ::Thank you again for the information. I imagine I should be careful about what I create. [[User:Grgcox|Grgcox]] 22:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

528926 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528926 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-14 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.195047360E09 +++$+++ Have you ever thought of becoming an admin? ''' +++$+++ Have you ever thought of becoming an admin? '''[[User:Blnguyen|<font color="GoldenRod">Blnguyen</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:Blnguyen|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 05:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
528927 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528926 +++$+++ 528926 +++$+++ 2007-11-14 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.195084140E09 +++$+++ Wow, 2 offers in 10 days from prominent Wikipedians! (see 8 threads up) I'm currently studying the process\/outcomes to see if I have an incorrect impression because my dated experiences with RfA have been negative.  +++$+++ :Wow, 2 offers in 10 days from prominent Wikipedians! (see 8 threads up) I'm currently studying the process/outcomes to see if I have an incorrect impression because my dated experiences with RfA have been negative. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 15:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

266784 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-13 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.176454740E09 +++$+++ Also, If we replace the maps with an image of a monument, then we could eliminate the architecture part. It would also make the article look colourful.Opinions? +++$+++ Also, If we replace the maps with an image of a monument, then we could eliminate the architecture part. It would also make the article look colourful.Opinions?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
266785 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266784 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.176455340E09 +++$+++ How do I connect the dots? I wanted this article to mainly reflect Polity(history of rise\/fall) and a few lines on Administration(language) and architecture (just the style). Language is an important part of government (this is perhaps the most focussed issue in India due to regional linguistic pride).Help me tie up the dots. +++$+++ ::How do I connect the dots? I wanted this article to mainly reflect Polity(history of rise/fall) and a few lines on Administration(language) and architecture (just the style). Language is an important part of government (this is perhaps the most focussed issue in India due to regional linguistic pride).Help me tie up the dots.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
266786 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266784 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.176455400E09 +++$+++ Ok, then we can put images (one per empire), eliminate the architecture part and reduce content.Sound ok? +++$+++ ::Ok, then we can put images (one per empire), eliminate the architecture part and reduce content.Sound ok?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
266787 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266784 +++$+++ 266784 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.176455940E09 +++$+++ Talking about linguistic pride, this citation I brought in today into the Kannada page helped clinch a major issue (an ongoing edit war with some guys who doubted the antiquity of Kannada)[http:\/\/www.hup.harvard.edu\/catalog\/MAHEAR.html] +++$+++ :Talking about linguistic pride, this citation I brought in today into the Kannada page helped clinch a major issue (an ongoing edit war with some guys who doubted the antiquity of Kannada)[http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/MAHEAR.html][[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
266788 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266784 +++$+++ 266787 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.176456240E09 +++$+++ I and some others have worked very hard on the Kannada Language page to bring in all the citations. Unfortunately, what you see (mingling of different cultures and languages in India) others dont see. Their ego blinds them. Each one thinks his language and culture has evolved in isolation. A pity!! +++$+++ ::I and some others have worked very hard on the Kannada Language page to bring in all the citations. Unfortunately, what you see (mingling of different cultures and languages in India) others dont see. Their ego blinds them. Each one thinks his language and culture has evolved in isolation. A pity!![[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

528929 +++$+++  +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-16 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.195250340E09 +++$+++ I've restored this article to [[User:Royalbroil\/V%2AEnna]].  If you have any pages in your userspace that you want deleted, just place {{tl|db-userreq}} on them and somebody can take care of them.  I hope you can expand the article a bit; it needs a lot of improvement compared to the other band articles linked from [[Essential Records (Christian)]].  If there's anything I can do to help out, let me know!   +++$+++ I've restored this article to [[User:Royalbroil/V%2AEnna]].  If you have any pages in your userspace that you want deleted, just place {{tl|db-userreq}} on them and somebody can take care of them.  I hope you can expand the article a bit; it needs a lot of improvement compared to the other band articles linked from [[Essential Records (Christian)]].  If there's anything I can do to help out, let me know!  [[User:Ioeth|Ioeth]] <sub>([[User_talk:Ioeth|talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Ioeth|contribs]] [[WP:FRIENDLY|friendly]])</sub> 13:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
528930 +++$+++  +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528929 +++$+++ 528929 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.195252020E09 +++$+++ Heh, I saw that you removed the V*Enna entry from [[Essential Records (Christian)]].  Did you want me to go ahead and delete [[User:Royalbroil\/V%2AEnna]], or are you still planning to work on it?  You can reply here, I'll have it watched.  Cheers!   +++$+++ :Heh, I saw that you removed the V*Enna entry from [[Essential Records (Christian)]].  Did you want me to go ahead and delete [[User:Royalbroil/V%2AEnna]], or are you still planning to work on it?  You can reply here, I'll have it watched.  Cheers!  [[User:Ioeth|Ioeth]] <sub>([[User_talk:Ioeth|talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Ioeth|contribs]] [[WP:FRIENDLY|friendly]])</sub> 14:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
528931 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528929 +++$+++ 528930 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.195252740E09 +++$+++ I'm formulating a longer response that I'm ready to post on your talk page.  +++$+++ ::I'm formulating a longer response that I'm ready to post on your talk page. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 14:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
528932 +++$+++  +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528929 +++$+++ 528931 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.195254960E09 +++$+++ I went ahead and removed the article from your userspace.  Thank you for the heads up about [[User talk:Rachael Lampa Fan|User:Rachael Lampa Fan]].  Based on the user's deleted contributions and the messages left on their talk page, it was obvious to me at the time that the user was disruptive.  However, after looking into their contributions more in depth today, I realized this was in error.  I went ahead and removed the warning from the user's talk page and left a message about the article.  You seem to have a good bit of experience under your belt, so would you be willing to offer Rachael Lampa Fan some advice about writing POV-correct articles?  I'm going to leave them another message with some advice specifically about V*Enna, and I think it would be excellent it if you could follow up as well.  Also, I'd like to extend a truly sincere thanks not just for pointing out my mistakes, but for opening up and engaging in a dialog that encouraged productivity and collaboration.  On a sidenote, based on the interaction we've had today, I would be happy to support you should you decide to RFA.  +++$+++ :::I went ahead and removed the article from your userspace.  Thank you for the heads up about [[User talk:Rachael Lampa Fan|User:Rachael Lampa Fan]].  Based on the user's deleted contributions and the messages left on their talk page, it was obvious to me at the time that the user was disruptive.  However, after looking into their contributions more in depth today, I realized this was in error.  I went ahead and removed the warning from the user's talk page and left a message about the article.  You seem to have a good bit of experience under your belt, so would you be willing to offer Rachael Lampa Fan some advice about writing POV-correct articles?  I'm going to leave them another message with some advice specifically about V*Enna, and I think it would be excellent it if you could follow up as well.  Also, I'd like to extend a truly sincere thanks not just for pointing out my mistakes, but for opening up and engaging in a dialog that encouraged productivity and collaboration.  On a sidenote, based on the interaction we've had today, I would be happy to support you should you decide to RFA. [[User:Ioeth|Ioeth]] <sub>([[User_talk:Ioeth|talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Ioeth|contribs]] [[WP:FRIENDLY|friendly]])</sub> 15:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

266789 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-13 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.176456480E09 +++$+++ trust me, there is no shortage of great images for this one. +++$+++ trust me, there is no shortage of great images for this one.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
266790 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266789 +++$+++ 266789 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.176459300E09 +++$+++ Not exactly. There is no timeline, everything is on going. One topic starts before the previous one ends. If this topic is ready for peer reivew with all copy edits, modifications done by the end of this month, then we can focus on the FAC of Rashtrakuta. If I get Nikhil's Ganga images from India by then, I will start on [[Western Ganga Dynasty]] in the background in earnest mid-May. Do you think a map of Karnataka showing ancient capitals will help the Political History.. article? +++$+++ :Not exactly. There is no timeline, everything is on going. One topic starts before the previous one ends. If this topic is ready for peer reivew with all copy edits, modifications done by the end of this month, then we can focus on the FAC of Rashtrakuta. If I get Nikhil's Ganga images from India by then, I will start on [[Western Ganga Dynasty]] in the background in earnest mid-May. Do you think a map of Karnataka showing ancient capitals will help the Political History.. article?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 03:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

44465 +++$+++ Jonnydrussell +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44465 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-25 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.282797960E09 +++$+++ Ah - so it is. Odd reference to have on there. I believe it would be more useful to people to have access to an area on that site where they can learn about ETFs, rather than reading an article that is out of date. Would you concur? [[User:Jonnydrussell|Jonnydrussell]] ([[User talk:Jonnydrussell|talk]]) 21:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)jonnydrussell +++$+++ Ah - so it is. Odd reference to have on there. I believe it would be more useful to people to have access to an area on that site where they can learn about ETFs, rather than reading an article that is out of date. Would you concur? [[User:Jonnydrussell|Jonnydrussell]] ([[User talk:Jonnydrussell|talk]]) 21:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)jonnydrussell[[User:Jonnydrussell|Jonnydrussell]] ([[User talk:Jonnydrussell|talk]]) 21:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
44466 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44465 +++$+++ 44465 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.283306160E09 +++$+++ Gee thanks, you old dog. -  +++$+++ :Gee thanks, you old dog. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 18:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

266794 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-13 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.176498180E09 +++$+++ competition, but whether you want it to or not, it will become one. So may as well elaborate on it, provide the citations and hope the readers are mature enough to see the citations and not vandalise or POV. +++$+++ competition, but whether you want it to or not, it will become one. So may as well elaborate on it, provide the citations and hope the readers are mature enough to see the citations and not vandalise or POV.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 14:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
266795 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266794 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.176498960E09 +++$+++ In fact I need to add one sentence to the empires at the bottom, the Sultanates. They actually gave patronage to Persian, with Kannada and Marathi used only for local matters. Can you imagine, Persian in South India? This is a fact. Many persian words have come into even south Indian languages because of this, especially in north Karnataka, north Andhra Pradesh. This is important from the readers point of view to mention this with a citation. Sure, there may be a fanatic somewhere who cant accept that Persian came into use in Karnataka, but history has to be brought out, patriotism or not. This is why I assert I am not trying to focus on one language, though undoubtedly Kannada is the main language of the region. +++$+++ ::In fact I need to add one sentence to the empires at the bottom, the Sultanates. They actually gave patronage to Persian, with Kannada and Marathi used only for local matters. Can you imagine, Persian in South India? This is a fact. Many persian words have come into even south Indian languages because of this, especially in north Karnataka, north Andhra Pradesh. This is important from the readers point of view to mention this with a citation. Sure, there may be a fanatic somewhere who cant accept that Persian came into use in Karnataka, but history has to be brought out, patriotism or not. This is why I assert I am not trying to focus on one language, though undoubtedly Kannada is the main language of the region.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 14:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
266796 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266794 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.176500040E09 +++$+++ I am not offended by your critisism, in fact it helps. If I cant write detailed\/unbiased (to a human extent) articles, then I am wasting my time on wikipedia. It just so happens I am writing all my articles on Karnataka, so Kannada naturally appears dominant. You will change any views you may have that I am partial to Karnataka quickly if I ever write about any other state. +++$+++ ::I am not offended by your critisism, in fact it helps. If I cant write detailed/unbiased (to a human extent) articles, then I am wasting my time on wikipedia. It just so happens I am writing all my articles on Karnataka, so Kannada naturally appears dominant. You will change any views you may have that I am partial to Karnataka quickly if I ever write about any other state.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 14:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
266797 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266794 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.176500880E09 +++$+++ This is where my fellow Indian reviewers come in. If there is any bias, they will catch on easily and immedietly. This is why its important to have as many  Indian reviewrs as western ones. The western reviewers go for format, presentations etc(things they relate to) and the Indians go for the content. +++$+++ ::This is where my fellow Indian reviewers come in. If there is any bias, they will catch on easily and immedietly. This is why its important to have as many  Indian reviewrs as western ones. The western reviewers go for format, presentations etc(things they relate to) and the Indians go for the content.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 14:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
266798 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266794 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.176530280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for Kakusthavarma. +++$+++ ::Thanks for Kakusthavarma.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
266799 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266794 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.176534240E09 +++$+++ Can I make edits to History of Med... +++$+++ ::Can I make edits to History of Med...[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
266800 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266794 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.176534420E09 +++$+++ Take a break.That will help +++$+++ ::Take a break.That will help[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

4652 +++$+++ JeffBillman +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ 4652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-01 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.251874320E09 +++$+++ Greetings, Niteshift!  I've asked an admin whom I respect greatly to weigh in on the whole Sean Hannity\/waterboarding\/sock puppet issue.  Though he and I have collaborated on several articles in the past, we come from very distinct worldviews.  As a self-described conservative Christian, he's actually probably more inclined to side with you, although I trust him completely to strive for a neutral point of view.  (Not saying you don't... but again, I've worked with him many times.)  Mainly, I'm hoping he can get to the bottom of the issue of sockpuppets and SPA's thwarting our efforts at consensus building.  Looking forward to working with him, and you! --  +++$+++ Greetings, Niteshift!  I've asked an admin whom I respect greatly to weigh in on the whole Sean Hannity/waterboarding/sock puppet issue.  Though he and I have collaborated on several articles in the past, we come from very distinct worldviews.  As a self-described conservative Christian, he's actually probably more inclined to side with you, although I trust him completely to strive for a neutral point of view.  (Not saying you don't... but again, I've worked with him many times.)  Mainly, I'm hoping he can get to the bottom of the issue of sockpuppets and SPA's thwarting our efforts at consensus building.  Looking forward to working with him, and you! -- [[User:JeffBillman|JeffBillman]] ([[User talk:JeffBillman|talk]]) 23:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
4653 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ 4652 +++$+++ 4652 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.251922740E09 +++$+++ Please don't think that I've supported the inclusion of the waterboarding statement because I want to see criticism of him for the sake of criticism \u2014 I believe that it's better included as an example of his political views on a touchy subject.  And your userboxes \u2014 see mine if you've not already looked.  I'm not suspecting you of being a staffer working with a hidden POV :-)   +++$+++ :Please don't think that I've supported the inclusion of the waterboarding statement because I want to see criticism of him for the sake of criticism — I believe that it's better included as an example of his political views on a touchy subject.  And your userboxes — see mine if you've not already looked.  I'm not suspecting you of being a staffer working with a hidden POV :-)  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 13:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
4654 +++$+++ JeffBillman +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ 4652 +++$+++ 4652 +++$+++ 2009-09-04 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.252050540E09 +++$+++ After giving the matter quite a bit of thought, I decided I agree with you on the Hal Turner issue.  It's just not notable to an article on Sean Hannity.  Indeed, about all that is notable about Hannity's days at WABC is that which already appears in the article-- and I say that as a fan of Hannity since shortly before his leaving WGST.  (Yes, really!  A non-traditional Libertarian who is a fan of a faithful Catholic conservative.  Whodda thunk it? ;-) )  What worries me, though, is how the article has been redacted to the point that it does now seem to be askew of NPOV.  And although the POV I think it now represents is not my own, that does not make it any more worrisome to me than if it had taken a POV that more closely matches my own.  Cheers! --  +++$+++ *After giving the matter quite a bit of thought, I decided I agree with you on the Hal Turner issue.  It's just not notable to an article on Sean Hannity.  Indeed, about all that is notable about Hannity's days at WABC is that which already appears in the article-- and I say that as a fan of Hannity since shortly before his leaving WGST.  (Yes, really!  A non-traditional Libertarian who is a fan of a faithful Catholic conservative.  Whodda thunk it? ;-) )  What worries me, though, is how the article has been redacted to the point that it does now seem to be askew of NPOV.  And although the POV I think it now represents is not my own, that does not make it any more worrisome to me than if it had taken a POV that more closely matches my own.  Cheers! -- [[User:JeffBillman|JeffBillman]] ([[User talk:JeffBillman|talk]]) 00:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

528944 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-26 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.196071260E09 +++$+++ Thank you for supporting my successful adminship. I appreciate the unanimous confidence that you gave me and promise not to abuse the extra buttons. I [[Polish Victory Lap|salute you]] the way that one of my idols [[Alan Kulwicki]] did to his fans after winning his only NASCAR championship: by turning around to face them and saying THANK YOU!  +++$+++ Thank you for supporting my successful adminship. I appreciate the unanimous confidence that you gave me and promise not to abuse the extra buttons. I [[Polish Victory Lap|salute you]] the way that one of my idols [[Alan Kulwicki]] did to his fans after winning his only NASCAR championship: by turning around to face them and saying THANK YOU! [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 02:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
528945 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.196072760E09 +++$+++ Congrats or commiserations, from a fellow cheesehead and newly-minted Wielder of the Mop'n'Bucket! -- +++$+++ :Congrats or commiserations, from a fellow cheesehead and newly-minted Wielder of the Mop'n'Bucket! --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  | [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 02:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
528946 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ 528945 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.196073000E09 +++$+++ Well done, well done, ''' +++$+++ ::Well done, well done, '''[[User:Blnguyen|<font color="GoldenRod">Blnguyen</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:Blnguyen|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 02:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
528947 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.196094960E09 +++$+++ Congratulations. Well that passed rather smoothly :-). If you ever have any questions about using your new buttons, feel free to get in touch. Best wishes, <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Congratulations. Well that passed rather smoothly :-). If you ever have any questions about using your new buttons, feel free to get in touch. Best wishes, <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 08:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
528948 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ 528947 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.196116860E09 +++$+++ Best wishes and Congratulations! I hope you will still be in WikiProject Wisconsin-Thank you- +++$+++ ::Best wishes and Congratulations! I hope you will still be in WikiProject Wisconsin-Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
528949 +++$+++ Jreferee +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.196305200E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on becoming a new admin! To learn a little about how to work your new tools, check out the [[Wikipedia:New admin school|New admin school]]. To display on your user page how long you have been an admin, just post the userbox string: '''<nowiki>{{User:EVula\/Userboxes\/admin since|year=2007|month=11|day=26}}<\/nowiki>''' Also, please consider adding your username to [[User:Radiant!\/Classification of admins|Classification of admins]]. Best! --  +++$+++ *Congratulations on becoming a new admin! To learn a little about how to work your new tools, check out the [[Wikipedia:New admin school|New admin school]]. To display on your user page how long you have been an admin, just post the userbox string: '''<nowiki>{{User:EVula/Userboxes/admin since|year=2007|month=11|day=26}}</nowiki>''' Also, please consider adding your username to [[User:Radiant!/Classification of admins|Classification of admins]]. Best! -- [[User:Jreferee|<font face="Kristen ITC" color="2A52BE">'''Jreferee '''</font>]][[User_talk:Jreferee|<font color="007BA7">  t</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Jreferee|<font color="007FFF">c</font>]] 19:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
528950 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.196307600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the tips! I found out about the New Admin School from [[User:Orangemike]]'s talk page and I passed. It helps that it was a pass\/fail class, lol. I'll look into the other tips.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the tips! I found out about the New Admin School from [[User:Orangemike]]'s talk page and I passed. It helps that it was a pass/fail class, lol. I'll look into the other tips. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 19:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
528951 +++$+++ Guroadrunner +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ 528944 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.196411940E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on the successful RFA!  +++$+++ : Congratulations on the successful RFA! [[User:Guroadrunner|Guroadrunner]] ([[User talk:Guroadrunner|talk]]) 00:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

266801 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-14 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.176544380E09 +++$+++ 9. Bijapur Sultanate-->[[Gol Gumbaz]] from [[Bijapur]] page. +++$+++ 9. Bijapur Sultanate-->[[Gol Gumbaz]] from [[Bijapur]] page.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 02:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
266802 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266801 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.176619500E09 +++$+++ are you there? +++$+++ ::are you there?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
266803 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266801 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.176620580E09 +++$+++ See todays main article. If this can be a main FA for the world and common man to read, I dont see why not an article on Political history of Karnataka emphasising a bit on Kannada. Just a thought +++$+++ ::See todays main article. If this can be a main FA for the world and common man to read, I dont see why not an article on Political history of Karnataka emphasising a bit on Kannada. Just a thought[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

266807 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-15 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.176680700E09 +++$+++ I'll talk to SilkTork some more about this issue. I understand that you're quite upset by his comments, and I'll do my best to try and resolve the dispute between you. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ I'll talk to SilkTork some more about this issue. I understand that you're quite upset by his comments, and I'll do my best to try and resolve the dispute between you. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 16:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
266808 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266807 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.176689760E09 +++$+++ Template was created by [[User:KNM]] +++$+++ ::Template was created by [[User:KNM]][[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
266809 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266807 +++$+++ 266807 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.176691260E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't advise posting a response under SilkTork's accusations, as this could blow up into another argument. I've communicated with SilkTork and explained that the issue with ignoring emails is probably a misunderstanding. As to the sockpuppetry accusations, I don't know what the situation was with that, but SilkTork probably came across the category [[:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Mattisse]] and jumped to the wrong conclusion. Not his fault. So my advice would be to disengage from this debate and cool off for a while. I will talk to SilkTork and try to sort this out for you. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :I wouldn't advise posting a response under SilkTork's accusations, as this could blow up into another argument. I've communicated with SilkTork and explained that the issue with ignoring emails is probably a misunderstanding. As to the sockpuppetry accusations, I don't know what the situation was with that, but SilkTork probably came across the category [[:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Mattisse]] and jumped to the wrong conclusion. Not his fault. So my advice would be to disengage from this debate and cool off for a while. I will talk to SilkTork and try to sort this out for you. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 19:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
266810 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266807 +++$+++ 266809 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.176691320E09 +++$+++ Ok. Take another look at copyediting Political History... We need an image for the Bahamani Sultanate.We need to tie it up. I need to add a few more lines in all. +++$+++ ::Ok. Take another look at copyediting Political History... We need an image for the Bahamani Sultanate.We need to tie it up. I need to add a few more lines in all.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
266811 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266807 +++$+++ 266809 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.176694500E09 +++$+++ I dont have anything for Kakusthavarma. Nothing would be more befitting than the [[Halmidi]] inscription as it is ascribed to him. I am planning on visiting Halmidi village for a photograph of the fibre glass replica of the inscription as well as Hulikere Pushkarni (Hoysala stepped tank with zodiac shrines) this year on my way back from Bhadra wildlife Sanctuary. +++$+++ ::I dont have anything for Kakusthavarma. Nothing would be more befitting than the [[Halmidi]] inscription as it is ascribed to him. I am planning on visiting Halmidi village for a photograph of the fibre glass replica of the inscription as well as Hulikere Pushkarni (Hoysala stepped tank with zodiac shrines) this year on my way back from Bhadra wildlife Sanctuary.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

4665 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Mdumas43073 +++$+++ 4665 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-14 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.197691320E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 20:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
4666 +++$+++ JLaTondre +++$+++ Mdumas43073 +++$+++ 4665 +++$+++ 4665 +++$+++ 2007-12-14 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.197699660E09 +++$+++ I have fixed your copy-n-paste move of [[Up on the House Top]]. I can see above that you have previously been told about using the move button instead of copy-n-pasting articles. Please do this correctly in the future. If you need help, see [[WP:MOVE]] or feel free to ask me or any other editor. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks. -- +++$+++ :I have fixed your copy-n-paste move of [[Up on the House Top]]. I can see above that you have previously been told about using the move button instead of copy-n-pasting articles. Please do this correctly in the future. If you need help, see [[WP:MOVE]] or feel free to ask me or any other editor. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] 22:21, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

528955 +++$+++ Graeme Bartlett +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-27 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.196168700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your feed back on [[Marchbanks Speedway]].  I nearly did not include it as there was not much web support for it, but when I realised it was a historical speedway, I decided it was worth having in Wikipedia.  I am surprised that you found it, as I had not categorised it!  +++$+++ Thanks for your feed back on [[Marchbanks Speedway]].  I nearly did not include it as there was not much web support for it, but when I realised it was a historical speedway, I decided it was worth having in Wikipedia.  I am surprised that you found it, as I had not categorised it! [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 05:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
528956 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528955 +++$+++ 528955 +++$+++ 2007-11-27 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.196172540E09 +++$+++ I found it at [[User:AlexNewArtBot\/NASCARSearchResult]] which I watch. The bot lists any new article with the string \"NASCAR\" in it. For future reference, you can bring up any United States race track (aka circuit) to me - I'm willing to assess if it belongs or not. I know plenty of websites for references.  +++$+++ :I found it at [[User:AlexNewArtBot/NASCARSearchResult]] which I watch. The bot lists any new article with the string "NASCAR" in it. For future reference, you can bring up any United States race track (aka circuit) to me - I'm willing to assess if it belongs or not. I know plenty of websites for references. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 06:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

266812 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266812 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-15 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.176694680E09 +++$+++ Look at this link for an idea about Bahamani monuments.[http:\/\/www.ioc.u-tokyo.ac.jp\/~islamarc\/WebPage1\/htm_eng\/gulbarga-eng.htm#jama%20m] +++$+++ Look at this link for an idea about Bahamani monuments.[http://www.ioc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~islamarc/WebPage1/htm_eng/gulbarga-eng.htm#jama%20m][[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
266813 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266812 +++$+++ 266812 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 09:24:00 +++$+++ 1.176740640E09 +++$+++ Update on the SilkTork question: SilkTork says that he will be satisfied if you retract the statements he regards as unfair, that is, ''I went to my AMA page and saw that he had withdrawn from the case. He did not inform me of this, he never asked my opinion about anything nor given my any feedback. He still has not answered my emails. He did not even notify me he had withdrawn.'' As we've established, that was neither your fault or his; it was a misunderstanding because your email wasn't working. So it might be best if you go to your previous posting [[WT:AMA#Suggest_AMA__policy_that__Advocates_answer_Advocee.27s_emails_.26_posts|here]] and retract those statements by striking them out. I think if you do that, then this dispute can stop right here. It isn't your fault, nor is it SilkTork's; it's just that this misunderstanding came at a difficult time, and blew up into a dispute. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Update on the SilkTork question: SilkTork says that he will be satisfied if you retract the statements he regards as unfair, that is, ''I went to my AMA page and saw that he had withdrawn from the case. He did not inform me of this, he never asked my opinion about anything nor given my any feedback. He still has not answered my emails. He did not even notify me he had withdrawn.'' As we've established, that was neither your fault or his; it was a misunderstanding because your email wasn't working. So it might be best if you go to your previous posting [[WT:AMA#Suggest_AMA__policy_that__Advocates_answer_Advocee.27s_emails_.26_posts|here]] and retract those statements by striking them out. I think if you do that, then this dispute can stop right here. It isn't your fault, nor is it SilkTork's; it's just that this misunderstanding came at a difficult time, and blew up into a dispute. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 09:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266814 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266812 +++$+++ 266813 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.176764040E09 +++$+++ Yes, I have seen some of those derogatory statements made by SilkTork towards you. I will talk to SilkTork and ask him to retract them; it wasn't acceptable for him to describe you as \"manipulative and exploitative\" and \"self-obsessed\" on a public talkpage. Hopefully SilkTork will be reasonable about this. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Yes, I have seen some of those derogatory statements made by SilkTork towards you. I will talk to SilkTork and ask him to retract them; it wasn't acceptable for him to describe you as "manipulative and exploitative" and "self-obsessed" on a public talkpage. Hopefully SilkTork will be reasonable about this. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 15:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266815 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266812 +++$+++ 266814 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.176766980E09 +++$+++ I really wouldn't advise going to ANI at this stage. I have asked SilkTork to retract the statements; I totally agree with you that he was wrong to describe you as \"manipulative and exploitative\", etc. I don't think he's online at the moment, so wait till tomorrow and see if he retracts the statements, as I requested. ANI should only be a last resort. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::I really wouldn't advise going to ANI at this stage. I have asked SilkTork to retract the statements; I totally agree with you that he was wrong to describe you as "manipulative and exploitative", etc. I don't think he's online at the moment, so wait till tomorrow and see if he retracts the statements, as I requested. ANI should only be a last resort. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 16:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266816 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266812 +++$+++ 266815 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.176767940E09 +++$+++ No, tomorrow won't be too late, as his comment was recent. Mattisse, I totally understand how you feel, and I realise that the way SilkTork described you was very upsetting. I'm really sorry that things got to this stage, and I don't know why SilkTork felt the need to attack you. However, I just think it would be best to give him a chance to explain himself, and to retract the statements. If he stands by his statements and refuses to give any explanation, then I will fully support you in going to ANI against him. But give him a chance to reply first. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::No, tomorrow won't be too late, as his comment was recent. Mattisse, I totally understand how you feel, and I realise that the way SilkTork described you was very upsetting. I'm really sorry that things got to this stage, and I don't know why SilkTork felt the need to attack you. However, I just think it would be best to give him a chance to explain himself, and to retract the statements. If he stands by his statements and refuses to give any explanation, then I will fully support you in going to ANI against him. But give him a chance to reply first. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 16:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

528957 +++$+++ Mailer diablo +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528957 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-27 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.196188800E09 +++$+++ Hi! Congrats on your new shiny mop and I'm very glad that you actually asked; it doesn't hurt to be conservative when one starts out initially (I knew how it was like when I first got mine). :) I've no objections to the undeletion of the article (as per your suggestion) if you are able to fix it up to exceed existing notability guidelines, which essentially is the concern resulting in its deletion. And of course, [[WP:V|sources]] are a must, and should be added shortly after restoration. Alternatively if you are writing from scratch and leaving the deleted edits as it is, that is also fine and I would suggest drafting on a userpage sandbox first. - ''Cheers'',  +++$+++ Hi! Congrats on your new shiny mop and I'm very glad that you actually asked; it doesn't hurt to be conservative when one starts out initially (I knew how it was like when I first got mine). :) I've no objections to the undeletion of the article (as per your suggestion) if you are able to fix it up to exceed existing notability guidelines, which essentially is the concern resulting in its deletion. And of course, [[WP:V|sources]] are a must, and should be added shortly after restoration. Alternatively if you are writing from scratch and leaving the deleted edits as it is, that is also fine and I would suggest drafting on a userpage sandbox first. - ''Cheers'', [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] ([[User talk:Mailer diablo|talk]]) 10:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
528958 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528957 +++$+++ 528957 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.196291160E09 +++$+++ Much as it pains me to say it (hey, my lady and I were '''at''' that 1984 concert), I fear the venue simply lacks notability; it's just a local rock club named as a cultural reference to a rock movie. The coverage is all local, and trivial; there are no significant events linked to it. An impartial judge would say it's a speedy delete: no meaningful assertion of notability. -- +++$+++ :Much as it pains me to say it (hey, my lady and I were '''at''' that 1984 concert), I fear the venue simply lacks notability; it's just a local rock club named as a cultural reference to a rock movie. The coverage is all local, and trivial; there are no significant events linked to it. An impartial judge would say it's a speedy delete: no meaningful assertion of notability. --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  | [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 15:06, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
528959 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528957 +++$+++ 528957 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.196292240E09 +++$+++ Mind if I make a few additional edits first? -- +++$+++ :Mind if I make a few additional edits first? --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  | [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 15:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

266817 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266817 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.176768840E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I really do understand how you feel, and I totally understand why SilkTork's and Steve's remarks hurt you. Also, in response to \"AMA thinks that is fine\", I am a member of AMA, and I don't think it's fine; I think SilkTork's remarks towards you were out of order. However, as I don't know all of the background to the case (I've gone through all the records, but obviously I don't have access to your emails), I just want to give SilkTork a chance to retract his statements. I am sure that when he reflects on the situation, he will apologise for his unfair remarks. But the best advice I can give you right now is to disengage, concentrate on other things, and I'll get back to you about this tomorrow. Cheer up! <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Mattisse, I really do understand how you feel, and I totally understand why SilkTork's and Steve's remarks hurt you. Also, in response to "AMA thinks that is fine", I am a member of AMA, and I don't think it's fine; I think SilkTork's remarks towards you were out of order. However, as I don't know all of the background to the case (I've gone through all the records, but obviously I don't have access to your emails), I just want to give SilkTork a chance to retract his statements. I am sure that when he reflects on the situation, he will apologise for his unfair remarks. But the best advice I can give you right now is to disengage, concentrate on other things, and I'll get back to you about this tomorrow. Cheer up! <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 17:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266818 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266817 +++$+++ 266817 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.176770340E09 +++$+++ It was SilkTork, not Steve, who wanted you to take back your remarks. Sorry if I confused the issue by mentioning both of them. And yes, you're right that SilkTork did violate [[WP:NPA]] and [[WP:CIVIL]] by his comments on you, and no, I don't think that emails or other evidence justify personal attacks. However, I would just advise waiting for a while and letting this dispute cool down. I will talk to SilkTork some more on your behalf, when he comes online. Hopefully SilkTork will apologise to you. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :It was SilkTork, not Steve, who wanted you to take back your remarks. Sorry if I confused the issue by mentioning both of them. And yes, you're right that SilkTork did violate [[WP:NPA]] and [[WP:CIVIL]] by his comments on you, and no, I don't think that emails or other evidence justify personal attacks. However, I would just advise waiting for a while and letting this dispute cool down. I will talk to SilkTork some more on your behalf, when he comes online. Hopefully SilkTork will apologise to you. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 17:39, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266819 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266817 +++$+++ 266818 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.176781560E09 +++$+++ Which are the dates that dont match with which other articles? Are the other articles mine too? If not, you should not worry about it. My information comes from books. Other people may take it from blog sites. +++$+++ ::Which are the dates that dont match with which other articles? Are the other articles mine too? If not, you should not worry about it. My information comes from books. Other people may take it from blog sites.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266820 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266817 +++$+++ 266818 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.176782040E09 +++$+++ If there is a slight mismatch , its ok. We cant correct linked pages here. If its off by decades, then we need to either not link or set aside \"linked topics for correction\" and see if we should correct them. +++$+++ ::If there is a slight mismatch , its ok. We cant correct linked pages here. If its off by decades, then we need to either not link or set aside "linked topics for correction" and see if we should correct them.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 20:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266821 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266817 +++$+++ 266818 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.176785820E09 +++$+++ The Tuglauq (or however its written) are entirely different. They ruled from Delhi or near abouts in North India.Ignore them. +++$+++ ::The Tuglauq (or however its written) are entirely different. They ruled from Delhi or near abouts in North India.Ignore them.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 21:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266822 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266817 +++$+++ 266818 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.176786300E09 +++$+++ I have replied on my talk page. +++$+++ ::I have replied on my talk page.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266823 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266817 +++$+++ 266818 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.176786660E09 +++$+++ yes. I crossed out those guys who are not in the Bijapur\/Bahamani picture. +++$+++ ::yes. I crossed out those guys who are not in the Bijapur/Bahamani picture.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266824 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266817 +++$+++ 266818 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.176786720E09 +++$+++ Ok. +++$+++ ::Ok.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266825 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266817 +++$+++ 266818 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.176788760E09 +++$+++ I know. Just delink Firuz Zhah and leave it. +++$+++ ::I know. Just delink Firuz Zhah and leave it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 22:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266826 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266817 +++$+++ 266818 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.176790020E09 +++$+++ Yah! ok. +++$+++ ::Yah! ok.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

528965 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-30 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.196488680E09 +++$+++ You may wish to retract your award of \"well-oiled machine\" to [[User:BetacommandBot]] because it had to be blocked yet again, due to this series of incidents ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Betacommand&diff=174905473&oldid=174862403 message and many following]).  You may also wish to consider the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=174907238 behavior] of the bot operator too.  +++$+++ You may wish to retract your award of "well-oiled machine" to [[User:BetacommandBot]] because it had to be blocked yet again, due to this series of incidents ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Betacommand&diff=174905473&oldid=174862403 message and many following]).  You may also wish to consider the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=174907238 behavior] of the bot operator too. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 21:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
528966 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528965 +++$+++ 528965 +++$+++ 2007-12-01 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.196511780E09 +++$+++ I'm under the impression that stars are more or less non-revocable except if the user is completely bad or banned. The bot has made hundreds of thousands of edits, so it can't be that bad on the whole. I checked out the diff on the person behind the bot. I'm [[WP:AGF|assuming good faith]]. Maybe the person was frantically trying to revert the edits, and they were tired of getting their talk page loaded with message. I'm an IT person with networking experience. I know that when things get out of hand, you repeatedly get messages that don't allow you to fix the real problem. You just want everyone to stop messaging you.  +++$+++ :I'm under the impression that stars are more or less non-revocable except if the user is completely bad or banned. The bot has made hundreds of thousands of edits, so it can't be that bad on the whole. I checked out the diff on the person behind the bot. I'm [[WP:AGF|assuming good faith]]. Maybe the person was frantically trying to revert the edits, and they were tired of getting their talk page loaded with message. I'm an IT person with networking experience. I know that when things get out of hand, you repeatedly get messages that don't allow you to fix the real problem. You just want everyone to stop messaging you. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 04:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

69988 +++$+++ Djwilms +++$+++ Djwilms +++$+++ 69988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-16 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.221565620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Djwilms|Djwilms]] ([[User talk:Djwilms#top|talk]]) 04:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
69989 +++$+++ PHG +++$+++ Djwilms +++$+++ 69988 +++$+++ 69988 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.221621180E09 +++$+++ Hi Djwilms! Thank you for your comments. Just one point about the start of the Sino-French war, but my main source on the subject (Jean Randier, ''La Royale'') states that there was indeed a declaration of war on 22 August 1884, which I guess would clarify where exactly the war starts: p.384 ''\"Un dernier ultimatum avait \xe9t\xe9 adress\xe9 \xe0 P\xe9kin le 19 Aout. Il resta bien entendu sans r\xe9ponse et le 22, Courbet apprenait que la guerre avait \xe9t\xe9 declar\xe9e.\"'' also ''\"Inform\xe9 de la d\xe9claration de guerre, le 22 Aout 1884, Courbet fait pr\xe9venir le Vice-Roi du Fou-Kien de son intention de combattre, par notre Vice-Consul, de Bezaure\"''. Would you have any other information on the subject? In any case, I guess we could have \"[[Tonkin campaign]]\" from 1883 until 22 August 1884 (the beginning of the war), then the [[Sino-French war]] (22 August 1884-April 1885) which of course includes the Tonkin war theater during that period, and, to your point, [[Tonkin pacification]] after April 1885. What do you think? Cheers  +++$+++ :Hi Djwilms! Thank you for your comments. Just one point about the start of the Sino-French war, but my main source on the subject (Jean Randier, ''La Royale'') states that there was indeed a declaration of war on 22 August 1884, which I guess would clarify where exactly the war starts: p.384 ''"Un dernier ultimatum avait été adressé à Pékin le 19 Aout. Il resta bien entendu sans réponse et le 22, Courbet apprenait que la guerre avait été declarée."'' also ''"Informé de la déclaration de guerre, le 22 Aout 1884, Courbet fait prévenir le Vice-Roi du Fou-Kien de son intention de combattre, par notre Vice-Consul, de Bezaure"''. Would you have any other information on the subject? In any case, I guess we could have "[[Tonkin campaign]]" from 1883 until 22 August 1884 (the beginning of the war), then the [[Sino-French war]] (22 August 1884-April 1885) which of course includes the Tonkin war theater during that period, and, to your point, [[Tonkin pacification]] after April 1885. What do you think? Cheers [[User:PHG|PHG]] ([[User talk:PHG|talk]]) 20:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

4682 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-15 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.242435600E09 +++$+++ Hey Baz, I'm afraid I don't have that much experience in those kinds of matters. I have ''felt'' that there was a whole drawer of socks (esp. Black Pauk) involved in the editing of that article (and your talk page), but I don't know how to go about proving that. BTW, I totally forgot about that AfD after my initial comment, sorry about that. BTW, that's a nice article, on [[Diaboli]]. I just rolled back the edit made by that probable sock in the [[black metal]] article, and I think that at the very least a 3RR block is called for. I don't know--perhaps we should wait and see, for right now, to find out how disruptive they are before we start a full-scale investigation. But I'll find a friendly admin to look into the triple revert here, and I'll do that right now. Oh, I need to get back to you on [[pagan metal]], the AfD for which left a bad taste in my mouth, and I would have but I've been busy with bacon, recent change patrol, and [[Kronos Quartet]] (and check out [[Kronos Quartet discography]], now a Featured List). Hey, it's Friday night where you're at--don't you need to run out and get a beer before the pubs close? Take care,  +++$+++ Hey Baz, I'm afraid I don't have that much experience in those kinds of matters. I have ''felt'' that there was a whole drawer of socks (esp. Black Pauk) involved in the editing of that article (and your talk page), but I don't know how to go about proving that. BTW, I totally forgot about that AfD after my initial comment, sorry about that. BTW, that's a nice article, on [[Diaboli]]. I just rolled back the edit made by that probable sock in the [[black metal]] article, and I think that at the very least a 3RR block is called for. I don't know--perhaps we should wait and see, for right now, to find out how disruptive they are before we start a full-scale investigation. But I'll find a friendly admin to look into the triple revert here, and I'll do that right now. Oh, I need to get back to you on [[pagan metal]], the AfD for which left a bad taste in my mouth, and I would have but I've been busy with bacon, recent change patrol, and [[Kronos Quartet]] (and check out [[Kronos Quartet discography]], now a Featured List). Hey, it's Friday night where you're at--don't you need to run out and get a beer before the pubs close? Take care, [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
4683 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4682 +++$+++ 4682 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.242435660E09 +++$+++ Wait, they're not at 3 yet. I'll add it to my watchlist. Who knows, maybe there's a sock to do it, in which case I'll have to change tack.  +++$+++ *Wait, they're not at 3 yet. I'll add it to my watchlist. Who knows, maybe there's a sock to do it, in which case I'll have to change tack. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
4684 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4682 +++$+++ 4683 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.242438360E09 +++$+++ Alright, they're reported. Sheesh what a hassle! Esp. if one's internet connection keeps going in and out. BTW, on pagan metal, I am leaning towards a merge now, but, like I said at the AfD, as long as (some of) those sources remain. I'll get back to you and the other AfD contributors on that. BTW, I've been listening to ''[[Grand Declaration of War]]'' and find it a little dull. Hey, have fun tonight!  +++$+++ **Alright, they're reported. Sheesh what a hassle! Esp. if one's internet connection keeps going in and out. BTW, on pagan metal, I am leaning towards a merge now, but, like I said at the AfD, as long as (some of) those sources remain. I'll get back to you and the other AfD contributors on that. BTW, I've been listening to ''[[Grand Declaration of War]]'' and find it a little dull. Hey, have fun tonight! [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
4685 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4682 +++$+++ 4682 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.243029120E09 +++$+++ I've dropped the admin a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Fabrictramp&diff=291623302&oldid=291613398 line].  +++$+++ *I've dropped the admin a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fabrictramp&diff=291623302&oldid=291613398 line]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 14:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
4686 +++$+++ Kelapstick +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4682 +++$+++ 4682 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.243051620E09 +++$+++ FYI I had [[User talk:Black pauk1488#Something that you should note|left a note]] on Black pauk1488's talk page regarding restoring deleted material and ownership of articles before you responded on the [[Lucifugum]] talk page.  -- +++$+++ :FYI I had [[User talk:Black pauk1488#Something that you should note|left a note]] on Black pauk1488's talk page regarding restoring deleted material and ownership of articles before you responded on the [[Lucifugum]] talk page.  --[[User:Kelapstick|kelapstick]] ([[User talk:Kelapstick|talk]]) 21:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

266827 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266827 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.176791100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:SilkTork|SilkTork]] 23:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266828 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266827 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.176791700E09 +++$+++ If they are in Delhi, I am afraid we cant use them. The image would have to be one built by the Bahamani's itself, possibly Bidar or Gulbarga. You are doing an amazing amount of research here. +++$+++ ::If they are in Delhi, I am afraid we cant use them. The image would have to be one built by the Bahamani's itself, possibly Bidar or Gulbarga. You are doing an amazing amount of research here.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266829 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266827 +++$+++ 266827 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.176791760E09 +++$+++ While having one image per paragraph is good, not having one cant disqualify it. +++$+++ :While having one image per paragraph is good, not having one cant disqualify it.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266830 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266827 +++$+++ 266829 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.176793140E09 +++$+++ [[Tughlaq dynasty]] are different, though perhaps the Bahamani's may have been their feudatory. +++$+++ ::[[Tughlaq dynasty]] are different, though perhaps the Bahamani's may have been their feudatory.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 23:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
266831 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266827 +++$+++ 266829 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.176795300E09 +++$+++ I am pretty new to Islamic dynasties myself. But being Indian, I can make an educated guess. we may have studied briefly about the Tughlaq's in school. +++$+++ ::I am pretty new to Islamic dynasties myself. But being Indian, I can make an educated guess. we may have studied briefly about the Tughlaq's in school.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 00:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

528973 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-02 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.196642640E09 +++$+++ Hi! There was an interesting article in the [[La Crosse Tribune]] this morning about the [[Trane]] Company. The Trib also had an very interesting timeline in the paper which unfortunately was not on line. I get the Trib everyday. I was able to cite the article in the Trane artcle this morning. One thing about the Farm tractor article Appleton, Wisconsin- do you think you think the title should be change to that of the company? Thanks- +++$+++ Hi! There was an interesting article in the [[La Crosse Tribune]] this morning about the [[Trane]] Company. The Trib also had an very interesting timeline in the paper which unfortunately was not on line. I get the Trib everyday. I was able to cite the article in the Trane artcle this morning. One thing about the Farm tractor article Appleton, Wisconsin- do you think you think the title should be change to that of the company? Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] 16:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
528974 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-02 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.196646480E09 +++$+++ I meant Eagle tractor not Farm tractor.My apologies. Thanks- +++$+++ :: I meant Eagle tractor not Farm tractor.My apologies. Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] 17:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
528975 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-02 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.196652120E09 +++$+++ I found another citation about the Dr. Charles G. Crosse in Sun Prairie. But, I had to put it as an external link because the present citation were more complex in their makeup. I hope it helps. Thanks again-  +++$+++ :::I found another citation about the Dr. Charles G. Crosse in Sun Prairie. But, I had to put it as an external link because the present citation were more complex in their makeup. I hope it helps. Thanks again- [[User:RFD|RFD]] 19:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
528976 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-02 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.196659740E09 +++$+++ Some people argue that print media is better than online, so you are wrong to assume that something needs to be online to use. I can't tell if I'm misunderstanding your comment or not. About the [[Eagle tractors]] article: I was planning to approach you on its name. It should either be called the same name as the company with redirects into it, or it should be [[Eagle tractor]] (singular). The plural is definitely wrong. My dad has heard of Eagle tractor. Do you want help with formatting the citations in the Grosse article?  +++$+++ ::::Some people argue that print media is better than online, so you are wrong to assume that something needs to be online to use. I can't tell if I'm misunderstanding your comment or not. About the [[Eagle tractors]] article: I was planning to approach you on its name. It should either be called the same name as the company with redirects into it, or it should be [[Eagle tractor]] (singular). The plural is definitely wrong. My dad has heard of Eagle tractor. Do you want help with formatting the citations in the Grosse article? [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 21:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
528977 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-02 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.196666760E09 +++$+++ Hi! 1- On the Tribune citation for Trane it is better then nothing since the article mention about American Standard taking back the Trane Company name. I do wish the Tribune had the Trane Company history dateline in it. I therefore used the Trib article as a citation. 2- With the citations in Dr. Crosse House article, I do not know if the citations were put in in there correctly or not. I did not want to wrack the article by putting an extra citation in. 3- As for the farmer tractor article I think the article should be redirected to the name of the company. I leave that one to your judgment. Thanks-  +++$+++ ::: Hi! 1- On the Tribune citation for Trane it is better then nothing since the article mention about American Standard taking back the Trane Company name. I do wish the Tribune had the Trane Company history dateline in it. I therefore used the Trib article as a citation. 2- With the citations in Dr. Crosse House article, I do not know if the citations were put in in there correctly or not. I did not want to wrack the article by putting an extra citation in. 3- As for the farmer tractor article I think the article should be redirected to the name of the company. I leave that one to your judgment. Thanks- [[User:RFD|RFD]] 23:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
528978 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528973 +++$+++ 528973 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.196711100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the changes- +++$+++ :Thanks for the changes-[[User:RFD|RFD]] 11:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

4687 +++$+++ Black pauk1488 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4687 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-22 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.243058700E09 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz! Please help me with saving Lucifugum article. I\u2019m sure you know this band is not less notable than [[:Clandestine Blaze]], [[:Deathspell Omega]] and [[:Xasthur]]. You\u2019re the user with a big experience and if you help me I\u2019ll be grateful. I\u2019ve made some mistakes, I know, but all this is just because of my wish to save the page of band which deserves it.-- +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz! Please help me with saving Lucifugum article. I’m sure you know this band is not less notable than [[:Clandestine Blaze]], [[:Deathspell Omega]] and [[:Xasthur]]. You’re the user with a big experience and if you help me I’ll be grateful. I’ve made some mistakes, I know, but all this is just because of my wish to save the page of band which deserves it.--[[User:Black pauk1488|Black pauk1488]] ([[User talk:Black pauk1488|talk]]) 23:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
4688 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4687 +++$+++ 4687 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.243639200E09 +++$+++ Indeed, Google translate is a great thing, I guess. And not all foreign wikis have very rigorous standards. The German WP claims they do, but I don't buy it. As for pornogrind, I'll have a look--but it seems a bit distasteful to me. Oh, ''Grand Declaration of War''? To each his own, I imagine...sorry, that's not mine. I've been listening to [[Kronos Quartet]] in the car, mixed in with a bit of [[M\xfctiilation]]. A student of mine burned me some [[Muse (band)|Muse]] and [[In Flames]]--and they're channeling [[Radiohead]] and [[Iron Maiden]], respectively. I'd rather listen to the original. OK, now on to porncore, or whatever it was called. Have a nice weekend! I'll be home, reading ''[[A Room of One's Own]]'' and ''[[The Hobbit]]''. ;)  +++$+++ *Indeed, Google translate is a great thing, I guess. And not all foreign wikis have very rigorous standards. The German WP claims they do, but I don't buy it. As for pornogrind, I'll have a look--but it seems a bit distasteful to me. Oh, ''Grand Declaration of War''? To each his own, I imagine...sorry, that's not mine. I've been listening to [[Kronos Quartet]] in the car, mixed in with a bit of [[Mütiilation]]. A student of mine burned me some [[Muse (band)|Muse]] and [[In Flames]]--and they're channeling [[Radiohead]] and [[Iron Maiden]], respectively. I'd rather listen to the original. OK, now on to porncore, or whatever it was called. Have a nice weekend! I'll be home, reading ''[[A Room of One's Own]]'' and ''[[The Hobbit]]''. ;) [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

266832 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-17 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.176828060E09 +++$+++ I've read your emails and will reply to them ASAP - sorry I forgot to check my email last night. My email address is walton_m@hotmail.co.uk. I'll give you some further advice on the SilkTork issue by email. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ I've read your emails and will reply to them ASAP - sorry I forgot to check my email last night. My email address is walton_m@hotmail.co.uk. I'll give you some further advice on the SilkTork issue by email. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 09:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
266833 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266832 +++$+++ 266832 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.176836580E09 +++$+++ I've sent you an email. I've also sent one to SilkTork asking him to apologise for his remarks about you. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :I've sent you an email. I've also sent one to SilkTork asking him to apologise for his remarks about you. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 12:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
266834 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266832 +++$+++ 266832 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.176840780E09 +++$+++ Since you've opened the ANI file, I've added some comments attempting to explain (in a neutral way) the history of the dispute. Otherwise other users won't know the background to what's going on. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Since you've opened the ANI file, I've added some comments attempting to explain (in a neutral way) the history of the dispute. Otherwise other users won't know the background to what's going on. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 13:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
266835 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266832 +++$+++ 266834 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.176855240E09 +++$+++ I've sent you another email in response to your posts. Please check your inbox. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::I've sent you another email in response to your posts. Please check your inbox. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 17:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
266836 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266832 +++$+++ 266835 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.176860820E09 +++$+++ I've replied to your email. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::I've replied to your email. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 18:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
266837 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266832 +++$+++ 266836 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.176863400E09 +++$+++ Replied. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::Replied. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 19:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
266838 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266832 +++$+++ 266832 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.176886140E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I have [[Rashtrakuta Dynasty]] in FAC review. We need to go the last mile now to finish the job and as always, I need your support. Thanks +++$+++ :Mattisse, I have [[Rashtrakuta Dynasty]] in FAC review. We need to go the last mile now to finish the job and as always, I need your support. Thanks[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
266839 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266832 +++$+++ 266832 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.176886680E09 +++$+++ I know. Felt so too. Lets wait and see what happens. removing material is always easier than adding. +++$+++ :I know. Felt so too. Lets wait and see what happens. removing material is always easier than adding.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 01:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

4689 +++$+++ Kelapstick +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-22 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.243055400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Kelapstick|kelapstick]] ([[User talk:Kelapstick|talk]]) 22:10, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
4690 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4689 +++$+++ 4689 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.243063740E09 +++$+++ Hi, I wonder if you'd take a look at [http:\/\/cdbaby.com\/cd\/lucifugum2] [http:\/\/www.discogs.com\/artist\/Lucifugum] [http:\/\/www.librariusmetallicus.com\/Band\/view\/2019] With regards to [[Lucifugum]]. It's not much, but I'm just curious.  +++$+++ :Hi, I wonder if you'd take a look at [http://cdbaby.com/cd/lucifugum2] [http://www.discogs.com/artist/Lucifugum] [http://www.librariusmetallicus.com/Band/view/2019] With regards to [[Lucifugum]]. It's not much, but I'm just curious. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJMitchell'''</font>]]  [[User_Talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">You rang? </font>]] 00:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
4691 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4689 +++$+++ 4690 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.243065720E09 +++$+++ Sorry- more musings on my talk page  +++$+++ ::Sorry- more musings on my talk page [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJMitchell'''</font>]]  [[User_Talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">You rang? </font>]] 01:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
4692 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4689 +++$+++ 4691 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.243071360E09 +++$+++ Hey HJ, the second and third link lead to article that have material from earlier versions of the Wikipedia article--not independent sources.  +++$+++ :::Hey HJ, the second and third link lead to article that have material from earlier versions of the Wikipedia article--not independent sources. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 02:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

4694 +++$+++ Graeme Bartlett +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4694 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-25 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.243278780E09 +++$+++ I think that 1488 is too obscure to be a username problem.  There will be heaps of usernames with POV embedded.  It gives you a clue as to the user.  We look at the actions and use the [[WP:AGF]]  +++$+++ I think that 1488 is too obscure to be a username problem.  There will be heaps of usernames with POV embedded.  It gives you a clue as to the user.  We look at the actions and use the [[WP:AGF]] [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 12:13, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
4695 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4694 +++$+++ 4694 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.243638840E09 +++$+++ Hey Baz, sorry, I didn't see that message on my talk until just now. I do think you're right--and I do think it will be very hard to make the case.  +++$+++ *Hey Baz, sorry, I didn't see that message on my talk until just now. I do think you're right--and I do think it will be very hard to make the case. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

612452 +++$+++ Samsara +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-30 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.164942060E09 +++$+++ Hi Dave, just saw your change [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&curid=5234&diff=91197284&oldid=91186402 here] and wasn't sure whether you meant to edit the copy of the article that's going to get overwritten when we move the temporary copy back. Btw, have we been able to remove enough of the tags to move it back? We probably don't want to keep it branched forever... Let me know when you feel comfortable moving it back (I know how to do this, it's not difficult, but probably not entirely obvious either).  +++$+++ Hi Dave, just saw your change [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&curid=5234&diff=91197284&oldid=91186402 here] and wasn't sure whether you meant to edit the copy of the article that's going to get overwritten when we move the temporary copy back. Btw, have we been able to remove enough of the tags to move it back? We probably don't want to keep it branched forever... Let me know when you feel comfortable moving it back (I know how to do this, it's not difficult, but probably not entirely obvious either). [[User:Samsara|Samsara]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Samsara|talk]]&nbsp;<small>•</small>&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Samsara|contribs]]) 19:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
612453 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612452 +++$+++ 612452 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.164943200E09 +++$+++ Since there's a conflict between sources and it's not a major point it's probably best left out of the final version \u2013 which is looking rather large already \u2013 but didn't want to leave my error in place. Am currently rethinking the inception of the theory and engagement period, rather slow reading. ..  +++$+++ :Since there's a conflict between sources and it's not a major point it's probably best left out of the final version – which is looking rather large already – but didn't want to leave my error in place. Am currently rethinking the inception of the theory and engagement period, rather slow reading. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

528986 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528986 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.196933100E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for putting the info from my article on Gungsrong Gungtsen on the Did You Know list. It is a real honour and much appreciated! Apologies for taking so long to write - but we are having the worst heatwave ever here in Cooktown, Australia and I haven't been able to stay on the computer for long as I start dripping all over it (I don't have an air conditioner - just fans - as all our electricity is produced by solar panels and air conditioners just use too much power for our system. Anyway, thanks again. I hope I will have more info of interest again soon! Best wishes for the Christmas season and throughout the New Year! Cheers!  +++$+++ Thanks so much for putting the info from my article on Gungsrong Gungtsen on the Did You Know list. It is a real honour and much appreciated! Apologies for taking so long to write - but we are having the worst heatwave ever here in Cooktown, Australia and I haven't been able to stay on the computer for long as I start dripping all over it (I don't have an air conditioner - just fans - as all our electricity is produced by solar panels and air conditioners just use too much power for our system. Anyway, thanks again. I hope I will have more info of interest again soon! Best wishes for the Christmas season and throughout the New Year! Cheers! [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill|talk]]) 01:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
528987 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528986 +++$+++ 528986 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.196949720E09 +++$+++ We have the opposite temperature here right now. The bank said -12 degrees Celcius. It's no wonder that a few top American [[midget car racing]] drivers go there for the winter to race.  +++$+++ :We have the opposite temperature here right now. The bank said -12 degrees Celcius. It's no wonder that a few top American [[midget car racing]] drivers go there for the winter to race. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 06:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

4699 +++$+++ Landon1980 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-12 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.244797500E09 +++$+++ You should not template established editors like you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Ibaranoff24&diff=295879143&oldid=295074520 here] during a content dispute. This is merely a content dispute, and the edit was not vandalism as you described in the edit summary. The only thing you will accomplish by misusing templates, and calling good-faith edits vandalism is to further inflame the situation. Calling someone editing in good-faith a vandal is very rude.  +++$+++ You should not template established editors like you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ibaranoff24&diff=295879143&oldid=295074520 here] during a content dispute. This is merely a content dispute, and the edit was not vandalism as you described in the edit summary. The only thing you will accomplish by misusing templates, and calling good-faith edits vandalism is to further inflame the situation. Calling someone editing in good-faith a vandal is very rude. [[User:Landon1980|Landon1980]] ([[User talk:Landon1980|talk]]) 02:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
4700 +++$+++ Landon1980 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4699 +++$+++ 4699 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.244927820E09 +++$+++ I figured you were aware of it, hence the word \"remind.\" You are edit warring, all there is to it. I never said you violated 3RR, and why you are taking offense to this is beyond me. I ran across your contribs and noticed you were calling several non-vandalism edits vandalism, and even templating other established users, so I left you a note, then I realized you were continuing to edit war.  +++$+++ :I figured you were aware of it, hence the word "remind." You are edit warring, all there is to it. I never said you violated 3RR, and why you are taking offense to this is beyond me. I ran across your contribs and noticed you were calling several non-vandalism edits vandalism, and even templating other established users, so I left you a note, then I realized you were continuing to edit war. [[User:Landon1980|Landon1980]] ([[User talk:Landon1980|talk]]) 14:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
4701 +++$+++ Landon1980 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4699 +++$+++ 4700 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.244932320E09 +++$+++ Three reverts in the span of 24 hours is considered edit warring by most.  +++$+++ ::Three reverts in the span of 24 hours is considered edit warring by most. [[User:Landon1980|Landon1980]] ([[User talk:Landon1980|talk]]) 15:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
4702 +++$+++ Landon1980 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4699 +++$+++ 4701 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.244932440E09 +++$+++ Let me take a look at what exactly is going one over there. I just read your last post on my talk.  +++$+++ :::Let me take a look at what exactly is going one over there. I just read your last post on my talk. [[User:Landon1980|Landon1980]] ([[User talk:Landon1980|talk]]) 15:34, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

528988 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.196952960E09 +++$+++ Fired you one. ''' +++$+++ Fired you one. '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 06:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
528989 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528988 +++$+++ 528988 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.196953320E09 +++$+++ Thanks. ''' +++$+++ :Thanks. '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 07:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

528990 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528990 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-07 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.197091320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the words of encouragement. I was initially reluctant to participate too heavily in DYK maintenance but it seems the admins are happy to have a helping hand, and I kind of enjoy preparing the page now and then :)  +++$+++ Thanks for the words of encouragement. I was initially reluctant to participate too heavily in DYK maintenance but it seems the admins are happy to have a helping hand, and I kind of enjoy preparing the page now and then :) [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 21:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
528991 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528990 +++$+++ 528990 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.197093240E09 +++$+++ I probably initially started fooling with it because I wanted to give my own entries more chance of success, but then I found it's kind of fun picking an appropriately varied bunch of hooks, tweaking them a tad if necessary, and re-arranging them in what is hopefully an interesting sequence. There's a degree of creativity in it.  +++$+++ :I probably initially started fooling with it because I wanted to give my own entries more chance of success, but then I found it's kind of fun picking an appropriately varied bunch of hooks, tweaking them a tad if necessary, and re-arranging them in what is hopefully an interesting sequence. There's a degree of creativity in it. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 21:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

4703 +++$+++ Landon1980 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4703 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-13 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.244932860E09 +++$+++ For now I have reverted, as they appear to be well-sourced, also I see no consensus to keep these bands out like he is claiming. Ibaranoff has quite a history, if he continues I will deal with it by reporting to the appropriate venue. He is on a very short leash regarding these types of edits, or well editing in general.  +++$+++ For now I have reverted, as they appear to be well-sourced, also I see no consensus to keep these bands out like he is claiming. Ibaranoff has quite a history, if he continues I will deal with it by reporting to the appropriate venue. He is on a very short leash regarding these types of edits, or well editing in general. [[User:Landon1980|Landon1980]] ([[User talk:Landon1980|talk]]) 15:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
4704 +++$+++ Landon1980 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4703 +++$+++ 4703 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.244934240E09 +++$+++ I also want to apologize if I rubbed you the wrong way, as that was not my intention. I should have looked into the situation better, and upon further review I see you have done a lot of work here recently with adding sources and rescuing it from a possible deletion. Let me know if I can help out with anything. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I also want to apologize if I rubbed you the wrong way, as that was not my intention. I should have looked into the situation better, and upon further review I see you have done a lot of work here recently with adding sources and rescuing it from a possible deletion. Let me know if I can help out with anything. Cheers, [[User:Landon1980|Landon1980]] ([[User talk:Landon1980|talk]]) 16:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
4705 +++$+++ Landon1980 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4703 +++$+++ 4704 +++$+++ 2009-06-15 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.245118440E09 +++$+++ I'm working on getting this straightened out. I'll comment further on the article's talk page later this evening. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::I'm working on getting this straightened out. I'll comment further on the article's talk page later this evening. Cheers, [[User:Landon1980|Landon1980]] ([[User talk:Landon1980|talk]]) 19:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
4706 +++$+++ Landon1980 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4703 +++$+++ 4705 +++$+++ 2009-06-15 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.245134520E09 +++$+++ I have a question though, why do you want Ibaranoff's user-page to be a non-working, red link on my talk page? It is Ibaranoff24, not Ibanaroff24.  +++$+++ :::I have a question though, why do you want Ibaranoff's user-page to be a non-working, red link on my talk page? It is Ibaranoff24, not Ibanaroff24. [[User:Landon1980|Landon1980]] ([[User talk:Landon1980|talk]]) 23:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

528992 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-09 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.197203700E09 +++$+++ Heh. that Inuse on DYK would have worked great... if I hadn't been editing it. Oh, well. Think I sorted it - checked the diff, added one you had selected that I hadn't.  +++$+++ Heh. that Inuse on DYK would have worked great... if I hadn't been editing it. Oh, well. Think I sorted it - checked the diff, added one you had selected that I hadn't. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 04:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
528993 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528992 +++$+++ 528992 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.197204060E09 +++$+++ I would have observed it, but realise it doesn't actually show until you hit save, and I had been editing for several minutes. But I checked the diffs and copied over one of your selections that I hadn't picked.  +++$+++ :I would have observed it, but realise it doesn't actually show until you hit save, and I had been editing for several minutes. But I checked the diffs and copied over one of your selections that I hadn't picked. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 04:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
528994 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528992 +++$+++ 528993 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.197204300E09 +++$+++ I think I moved all of yours to the next update. I'll double check.  +++$+++ ::I think I moved all of yours to the next update. I'll double check. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 04:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
528995 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528992 +++$+++ 528994 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.197204600E09 +++$+++ Oops, no, I had missed one. Though can you check that I put the right Eric Kattus tag up? I know  nothing about American football, and it's all gibberish to me =)  +++$+++ :::Oops, no, I had missed one. Though can you check that I put the right Eric Kattus tag up? I know  nothing about American football, and it's all gibberish to me =) [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 04:50, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
528996 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528992 +++$+++ 528995 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.197205560E09 +++$+++ Well, you'll have to get cracking on your home team then =) And sorry about all the trouble: Just I don't like people to miss out without good reason, so figured I'd have a rifle through December 4th, since there were a lot of noms. Going to be a little hard to get all the nice pictures in - I do like the Creme brulee one - but, well, as has been pointed out to me after some worry last night, we can fudge the rules a little bit to balance the updates. (the pictured fact in the update we were working on is actually from December 3, held back to balance out updates. =)  +++$+++ ::::Well, you'll have to get cracking on your home team then =) And sorry about all the trouble: Just I don't like people to miss out without good reason, so figured I'd have a rifle through December 4th, since there were a lot of noms. Going to be a little hard to get all the nice pictures in - I do like the Creme brulee one - but, well, as has been pointed out to me after some worry last night, we can fudge the rules a little bit to balance the updates. (the pictured fact in the update we were working on is actually from December 3, held back to balance out updates. =) [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 05:06, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
528997 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528992 +++$+++ 528996 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.197206340E09 +++$+++ No apologies needed. It happens. I wish I could feel comfortable with going through the articles listed for the next update faster. Too bad there are so many United States articles nominated for December 4th. I was hoping to use about 1\/3 U.S. in this next update. About 8 hours from now is a time during most weeks where the update doesn't get done on time. I looked through the whole list of articles so that I can quickly update the main page at that time (if needed), since it is time to get to sleep here. I understand and agree with small bends in the rules needed to keep the DYK list balanced. My favorite picture is the snocross one, but I'm a ''little'' biased! I should get cracking on my home team! American football is not my strongest area, so maybe later.  +++$+++ :::::No apologies needed. It happens. I wish I could feel comfortable with going through the articles listed for the next update faster. Too bad there are so many United States articles nominated for December 4th. I was hoping to use about 1/3 U.S. in this next update. About 8 hours from now is a time during most weeks where the update doesn't get done on time. I looked through the whole list of articles so that I can quickly update the main page at that time (if needed), since it is time to get to sleep here. I understand and agree with small bends in the rules needed to keep the DYK list balanced. My favorite picture is the snocross one, but I'm a ''little'' biased! I should get cracking on my home team! American football is not my strongest area, so maybe later. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 05:19, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
528998 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 528992 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.197206880E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, I'm in Britain, and I'm up. I'll get the next update, and try to catch the one after that.  +++$+++ :::::::Don't worry, I'm in Britain, and I'm up. I'll get the next update, and try to catch the one after that. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 05:28, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

266849 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.176946440E09 +++$+++ However, the practice of striking out as the matter of copyediting in your own sandbox is accepted, so that other people can quickly understand what are the lines you preferred to remove. But it is certainly not acceptable in mainspace articles. Hope it makes sense. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks -  +++$+++ However, the practice of striking out as the matter of copyediting in your own sandbox is accepted, so that other people can quickly understand what are the lines you preferred to remove. But it is certainly not acceptable in mainspace articles. Hope it makes sense. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks - [[User:KNM|KNM]] <sup> '''[[:User_talk:KNM|Talk]]'''</sup> 18:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
266850 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266849 +++$+++ 266849 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.176947760E09 +++$+++ While the above method is apparently the best approach, I understand it is time and effort consuming. If you think, you will have to spend too much of ''unnecessary'' time in that process, please go ahead and make the changes directly in the main article, without striking out. Then Dinesh can go over all the diffs of yours edits, and see what are the changes you have made. Let me know if there is any help, I can do. Thanks, -  +++$+++ :While the above method is apparently the best approach, I understand it is time and effort consuming. If you think, you will have to spend too much of ''unnecessary'' time in that process, please go ahead and make the changes directly in the main article, without striking out. Then Dinesh can go over all the diffs of yours edits, and see what are the changes you have made. Let me know if there is any help, I can do. Thanks, - [[User:KNM|KNM]] <sup> '''[[:User_talk:KNM|Talk]]'''</sup> 18:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
266851 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266849 +++$+++ 266850 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.176948060E09 +++$+++ Yes, it is exhausting copy editing his work because of all the footnotes etc.  -- it is very hard to find my place. I'm just going to take  a chance and remove what I have struck out. Then I just won't do any more until he decides.  I'm pretty tired anyway. Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Yes, it is exhausting copy editing his work because of all the footnotes etc.  -- it is very hard to find my place. I'm just going to take  a chance and remove what I have struck out. Then I just won't do any more until he decides.  I'm pretty tired anyway. Sincerely, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 19:01, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

4707 +++$+++ 86.46.221.21 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-18 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.245384000E09 +++$+++ I was wondering if Nocte Obducta are notable enough to have an article, also, what's the deal with dark metal?  I see it pop up in genre boxes every now and then, but it just redirects to black metal.  Is it a genre (I 've never heard of it outside of wikipedia) ?  I noticed that the German wiki has an article on both, but I can't read a word of German.  [[Special:Contributions\/86.46.221.21|86.46.221.21]] ( +++$+++ I was wondering if Nocte Obducta are notable enough to have an article, also, what's the deal with dark metal?  I see it pop up in genre boxes every now and then, but it just redirects to black metal.  Is it a genre (I 've never heard of it outside of wikipedia) ?  I noticed that the German wiki has an article on both, but I can't read a word of German.  [[Special:Contributions/86.46.221.21|86.46.221.21]] ([[User talk:86.46.221.21|talk]]) 21:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
4708 +++$+++ 86.46.221.21 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4707 +++$+++ 4707 +++$+++ 2009-06-18 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.245384060E09 +++$+++ Nevermind, there is a dark metal article (must be new).  [[Special:Contributions\/86.46.221.21|86.46.221.21]] ( +++$+++ :Nevermind, there is a dark metal article (must be new).  [[Special:Contributions/86.46.221.21|86.46.221.21]] ([[User talk:86.46.221.21|talk]]) 21:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

612454 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-01 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.165005000E09 +++$+++ Just thought you should know that I think I've put in cite needed tags everywhere they need to be now, so that's that done. I'm really sorry I haven't been able to help more with the actual citations - I've been ill, and so haven't been able to get to books. But I hope I've still helped. By my calculations, we're about 2\/5ths done, given we started with 29 cites, now have 70, and have 59 left to add. Of course, some of those cluster, so it'll probably be less in practice. +++$+++ Just thought you should know that I think I've put in cite needed tags everywhere they need to be now, so that's that done. I'm really sorry I haven't been able to help more with the actual citations - I've been ill, and so haven't been able to get to books. But I hope I've still helped. By my calculations, we're about 2/5ths done, given we started with 29 cites, now have 70, and have 59 left to add. Of course, some of those cluster, so it'll probably be less in practice.[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 12:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
612455 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612454 +++$+++ 612454 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.165007640E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for the help, getting cites from D&M can be done fairly quickly, but I'm trying to check against Browne and other sources which takes a while. Very useful reexamining the evidence. ..  +++$+++ :Thanks a lot for the help, getting cites from D&M can be done fairly quickly, but I'm trying to check against Browne and other sources which takes a while. Very useful reexamining the evidence. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 13:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
612456 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612454 +++$+++ 612455 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.165014900E09 +++$+++ No bother! Glad to help. And I finally did a bit by citing up the Eugenics section - the Eugenics article is very well-done, so I was able to borrow from it for the summary =)  +++$+++ ::No bother! Glad to help. And I finally did a bit by citing up the Eugenics section - the Eugenics article is very well-done, so I was able to borrow from it for the summary =) [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 15:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

4711 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4711 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-11 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.250031840E09 +++$+++ ...at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Latin Metal (3rd nomination)]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ ...at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latin Metal (3rd nomination)]]. Thanks. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
4712 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4711 +++$+++ 4711 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.250674080E09 +++$+++ And have a look at this: [[User:Drmies\/Sandbox]]. What a fun job. I can't believe you came up with sources for all of them.  +++$+++ *And have a look at this: [[User:Drmies/Sandbox]]. What a fun job. I can't believe you came up with sources for all of them. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 02:28, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

529001 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-10 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.197288300E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> Great job, hooks on back to back DYKs for the first time ever. You're AWESOME! -- +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> Great job, hooks on back to back DYKs for the first time ever. You're AWESOME! --[[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 04:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
529002 +++$+++ The359 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529001 +++$+++ 529001 +++$+++ 2007-12-10 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.197290700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the medal, and congrats from me as well to you for another fine DYK, also helping to expand motorsports of all kinds here on Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the medal, and congrats from me as well to you for another fine DYK, also helping to expand motorsports of all kinds here on Wikipedia. [[User:The359|The359]] ([[User talk:The359|talk]]) 04:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

4716 +++$+++ Gunmetal Angel +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4716 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-09 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.252549860E09 +++$+++ What's with your edit where you're actually lowercasing the \"F\" on DragonForce? I didn't mean to revert it in [[WP:BF|bad faith]] or anything but that seriously made no sense. For a long time I always noticed how people would miss captalizing the letter in the middle of a word, it's proper grammar, some words (for example DragonForce, PlayStation and YouTube... ect.) have a letter capatalized in the middle of the word, because that's just how it's written. Your edit was reverted a second time, but not by me. \u2014  +++$+++ What's with your edit where you're actually lowercasing the "F" on DragonForce? I didn't mean to revert it in [[WP:BF|bad faith]] or anything but that seriously made no sense. For a long time I always noticed how people would miss captalizing the letter in the middle of a word, it's proper grammar, some words (for example DragonForce, PlayStation and YouTube... ect.) have a letter capatalized in the middle of the word, because that's just how it's written. Your edit was reverted a second time, but not by me. — [[User:Gunmetal Angel|<font face="papyrus"><font color="#green">GunMetal Angel</font></font>]] 19:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
4717 +++$+++ Gunmetal Angel +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4716 +++$+++ 4716 +++$+++ 2009-09-10 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.252639440E09 +++$+++ Yeah. I understand why, but DragonForce has their name wirtten like that because that's just the plain why it is written, Korn, Slipknot or Mudvayne being typset as KoRn SlipKnoT or MuDvAyNe is ridiculous at that, it's mostly kids attempting to mimic the band's logo. DragonForce on the other hand is typed with a capital \"F\" not to mimic a type of logo or show fanning, it's the correct way to have their name stated in text just as to the same reason why PlayStation has a capital \"S\" in the middle of it.  \u2022  +++$+++ :Yeah. I understand why, but DragonForce has their name wirtten like that because that's just the plain why it is written, Korn, Slipknot or Mudvayne being typset as KoRn SlipKnoT or MuDvAyNe is ridiculous at that, it's mostly kids attempting to mimic the band's logo. DragonForce on the other hand is typed with a capital "F" not to mimic a type of logo or show fanning, it's the correct way to have their name stated in text just as to the same reason why PlayStation has a capital "S" in the middle of it.  • [[User:Gunmetal Angel|<font face="papyrus"><font color="#green">GunMetal Angel</font></font>]] 20:24, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

4718 +++$+++ Michig +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-11 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.252689060E09 +++$+++ I was tempted to restore the real name and MusicMight reference here, but I'm not sure that we can treat MM as a reliable source any more since it has become editable in much the same way as EM. It's a shame as it has been a decent source for a lot of articles.-- +++$+++ I was tempted to restore the real name and MusicMight reference here, but I'm not sure that we can treat MM as a reliable source any more since it has become editable in much the same way as EM. It's a shame as it has been a decent source for a lot of articles.--[[User:Michig|Michig]] ([[User talk:Michig|talk]]) 10:11, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
4719 +++$+++ Michig +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4718 +++$+++ 4718 +++$+++ 2009-09-12 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.252794660E09 +++$+++ I agree entirely that the real name should be included. Having created an account at MusicMight it seems that the actual biographies can't be edited, so they should still be ok as reliable sources. Other sections such as members and releases can be edited but are moderated so we'll have to see how that goes. I have no objection to MM being used as a reliable source at present.-- +++$+++ :I agree entirely that the real name should be included. Having created an account at MusicMight it seems that the actual biographies can't be edited, so they should still be ok as reliable sources. Other sections such as members and releases can be edited but are moderated so we'll have to see how that goes. I have no objection to MM being used as a reliable source at present.--[[User:Michig|Michig]] ([[User talk:Michig|talk]]) 15:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

4722 +++$+++ Gunmetal Angel +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-02 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.254468420E09 +++$+++ Remember [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Blackmetalbaz&diff=297272518&oldid=292462869 this edit]? It's a serious question I'd like to ask that person if I could, but seriously, how can you hate something that isn't even real? \u2022  +++$+++ Remember [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Blackmetalbaz&diff=297272518&oldid=292462869 this edit]? It's a serious question I'd like to ask that person if I could, but seriously, how can you hate something that isn't even real? • [[User:Gunmetal Angel|<font face="papyrus"><font color="#green">GunMetal Angel</font></font>]] 00:27, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
4723 +++$+++ Gunmetal Angel +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4722 +++$+++ 4722 +++$+++ 2009-10-02 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.254530220E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I know what you mean, it's all about sources, that's what people don't understand. I use Wikipedia because it's the only endless base of infinite information ever established. People don't rely on it because basic people (mostly ignorant ones at that) would be like \"I don't use that website, people can change or write whatever they want\" when this is completely false. Wikipedia in short are articles composed of all the true, reliable information found possible all put together onto one article about that subject, at least college professors understand that, because I actually found some of them using Wikipedia at their desk or have articles printed out now and then. And plus anything that IP addresses write, are reverted almost 70% of the time, anyway. --  +++$+++ :Yeah, I know what you mean, it's all about sources, that's what people don't understand. I use Wikipedia because it's the only endless base of infinite information ever established. People don't rely on it because basic people (mostly ignorant ones at that) would be like "I don't use that website, people can change or write whatever they want" when this is completely false. Wikipedia in short are articles composed of all the true, reliable information found possible all put together onto one article about that subject, at least college professors understand that, because I actually found some of them using Wikipedia at their desk or have articles printed out now and then. And plus anything that IP addresses write, are reverted almost 70% of the time, anyway. -- [[User:Gunmetal Angel|<font face="papyrus"><font color="#green">GunMetal Angel</font></font>]] 17:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

262931 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262931 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-06 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.212800940E09 +++$+++ I see where you've made a whole bunch of great comments about [[Alzheimer's disease]] article.  Is there any way I can beg you to implement some of your comments in the section?  I'm trying to do a broad copyedit, and I'm hoping you can fix the epidemiology section.  Thanks.   +++$+++ I see where you've made a whole bunch of great comments about [[Alzheimer's disease]] article.  Is there any way I can beg you to implement some of your comments in the section?  I'm trying to do a broad copyedit, and I'm hoping you can fix the epidemiology section.  Thanks.  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 18:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
262932 +++$+++ Garrondo +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262931 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.213021080E09 +++$+++ I have seen your comments on orangemarlin page. I promise all to the article sections were fully revised (I did most of it) and rewritten whit the exceptions of \"causes\" and \"epidemiology\" so don't worry about references in those other sections. I agree that the epidemiology section is years far from the quality of the other sections. -- +++$+++ ::I have seen your comments on orangemarlin page. I promise all to the article sections were fully revised (I did most of it) and rewritten whit the exceptions of "causes" and "epidemiology" so don't worry about references in those other sections. I agree that the epidemiology section is years far from the quality of the other sections. --[[User:Garrondo|Garrondo]] ([[User talk:Garrondo|talk]]) 07:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
262933 +++$+++ Garrondo +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262931 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-14 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.213479180E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I have fully rewritten the epidemiology section. I'm no expert but I think I have used reliable references and I am quite happy with the outcome. Would you take a look at it? Best regards. -- +++$+++ :::Hi there. I have fully rewritten the epidemiology section. I'm no expert but I think I have used reliable references and I am quite happy with the outcome. Would you take a look at it? Best regards. --[[User:Garrondo|Garrondo]] ([[User talk:Garrondo|talk]]) 14:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

4724 +++$+++ Danteferno +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-08 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.255043160E09 +++$+++ I find it a little odd that you accuse a source of being unreliable, yet some of the links already on the above page consist of '''album reviews''' ([[Allmusic]] reviews called [[Static X]] thrash metal and [[Tool (band)|Tool]] death metal) or '''dead links''', which don't have any reliability AT ALL. In addition, plenty of Google search strings point to [[Necrophobic]] as being melodic death or melodic black\/death, so there's not much of a debate here - we might as well remove [[At The Gates]] and [[Dissection (band)|Dissection]], too - same exact style. -- +++$+++ I find it a little odd that you accuse a source of being unreliable, yet some of the links already on the above page consist of '''album reviews''' ([[Allmusic]] reviews called [[Static X]] thrash metal and [[Tool (band)|Tool]] death metal) or '''dead links''', which don't have any reliability AT ALL. In addition, plenty of Google search strings point to [[Necrophobic]] as being melodic death or melodic black/death, so there's not much of a debate here - we might as well remove [[At The Gates]] and [[Dissection (band)|Dissection]], too - same exact style. --[[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] ([[User talk:Danteferno|talk]]) 16:06, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
4725 +++$+++ Danteferno +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4724 +++$+++ 4724 +++$+++ 2009-10-08 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.255052520E09 +++$+++ Very interesting\/ironic how you answered to very few of the above points - instead, you dictated Wikipedia policy in a matter where it really doesn't apply, and actually appears a little hypocritical. So, I'll elaborate: [[Allmusic]] reviews are used in the above page as genre sources. Allmusic reviews ARE NOT a reliable source of genre information. For example, the website reviews called [[Static X]] thrash metal and [[Tool (band)|Tool]] death metal. I don't think any of us are going to rush to put those genres in those band pages, because it's not true. Perhaps it is you who should read up on Wikipedia policy, particularly on the Wikipedia policy of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ownership_of_articles|No page ownership]? Judging by the page history, it appears you've been treating the above article as personal fiefdom.-- +++$+++ :Very interesting/ironic how you answered to very few of the above points - instead, you dictated Wikipedia policy in a matter where it really doesn't apply, and actually appears a little hypocritical. So, I'll elaborate: [[Allmusic]] reviews are used in the above page as genre sources. Allmusic reviews ARE NOT a reliable source of genre information. For example, the website reviews called [[Static X]] thrash metal and [[Tool (band)|Tool]] death metal. I don't think any of us are going to rush to put those genres in those band pages, because it's not true. Perhaps it is you who should read up on Wikipedia policy, particularly on the Wikipedia policy of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ownership_of_articles|No page ownership]? Judging by the page history, it appears you've been treating the above article as personal fiefdom.--[[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] ([[User talk:Danteferno|talk]]) 18:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
4726 +++$+++ Danteferno +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4724 +++$+++ 4725 +++$+++ 2009-10-08 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.255053960E09 +++$+++ Using an edit summary to state another user needs to \"read up\" on rules also falls under [[WP:CIVIL]]. Back to the topic: Do you really think [[Allmusic]] is a reliable 3rd Party source with the above facts presented to you? Also, please see the talk page for the above article.-- +++$+++ ::Using an edit summary to state another user needs to "read up" on rules also falls under [[WP:CIVIL]]. Back to the topic: Do you really think [[Allmusic]] is a reliable 3rd Party source with the above facts presented to you? Also, please see the talk page for the above article.--[[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] ([[User talk:Danteferno|talk]]) 19:06, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
4727 +++$+++ Danteferno +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4724 +++$+++ 4725 +++$+++ 2009-10-08 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.255054260E09 +++$+++ Also, this isn't very [[WP:CIVIL]] civil (or true) either: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Necrophobic&diff=318705588&oldid=318581139]-- +++$+++ ::Also, this isn't very [[WP:CIVIL]] civil (or true) either: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Necrophobic&diff=318705588&oldid=318581139]--[[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] ([[User talk:Danteferno|talk]]) 19:11, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

529014 +++$+++ 86.42.83.73 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-17 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.197919800E09 +++$+++ Hope that one goes up so everyone can go, \"THAT'S NOT A WORD! Wait, is that a word? Damn, that's a word!\" <small><small>like i just did<\/small><\/small> [[Special:Contributions\/86.42.83.73|86.42.83.73]] ( +++$+++ Hope that one goes up so everyone can go, "THAT'S NOT A WORD! Wait, is that a word? Damn, that's a word!" <small><small>like i just did</small></small> [[Special:Contributions/86.42.83.73|86.42.83.73]] ([[User talk:86.42.83.73|talk]]) 11:30, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
529015 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529014 +++$+++ 529014 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.197929700E09 +++$+++ I hope that the main suggestion runs. It's unbelievable that he qualified first for every event in a season.  +++$+++ :I hope that the main suggestion runs. It's unbelievable that he qualified first for every event in a season. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 14:15, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

612457 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-01 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.165038480E09 +++$+++ ...We MUST rewrite the whole section on the logic behind the development of Darwin's theory. It's AWFUL, and doesn't explain it at all. Gould did an excellent article on it, but I can't remember in which book (curse it!).  +++$+++ ...We MUST rewrite the whole section on the logic behind the development of Darwin's theory. It's AWFUL, and doesn't explain it at all. Gould did an excellent article on it, but I can't remember in which book (curse it!). [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 21:48, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
612458 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612457 +++$+++ 612457 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.165041660E09 +++$+++ Hope that's a start on rewriting the inception: will review the development, but the article's a bit long to go over previous sections, and some stripping down needs to be considered. The children bit may fit better at the foot, with a brief mention of the marriage in what becomes \"illness, natural selection and marriage\" or something. ...  +++$+++ :Hope that's a start on rewriting the inception: will review the development, but the article's a bit long to go over previous sections, and some stripping down needs to be considered. The children bit may fit better at the foot, with a brief mention of the marriage in what becomes "illness, natural selection and marriage" or something. ... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
612459 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612457 +++$+++ 612458 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.165042200E09 +++$+++ Weel, I'm going to hand over to you for a while. I've done a fair bit of work already. Do promise me we won't lose the Marry\/Not marry lists, though.  +++$+++ ::Weel, I'm going to hand over to you for a while. I've done a fair bit of work already. Do promise me we won't lose the Marry/Not marry lists, though. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 22:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

529017 +++$+++ Graeme Bartlett +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-18 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.197986280E09 +++$+++ There is some more contribution on [[Marchbanks Speedway]] at [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation\/2006-08-04#Marchbanks Speedway, Hanford, CA]].  You may wish to check out if any text is worthwhile preserving.  I will decline the article as it exists (I created it before remember!).  +++$+++ There is some more contribution on [[Marchbanks Speedway]] at [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/2006-08-04#Marchbanks Speedway, Hanford, CA]].  You may wish to check out if any text is worthwhile preserving.  I will decline the article as it exists (I created it before remember!). [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 05:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
529018 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529017 +++$+++ 529017 +++$+++ 2007-12-18 06:38:00 +++$+++ 1.197988680E09 +++$+++ {{done}} I used it to expand the shape of one of the tracks. Thanks for the tip.  +++$+++ :{{done}} I used it to expand the shape of one of the tracks. Thanks for the tip. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 06:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

4731 +++$+++ Gunmetal Angel +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4731 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-03 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.257248820E09 +++$+++ I made a decision to remove the genres from their first two albums, in the consideration of me being an Underoath fan I've seen numerous soucres stating they had a completely different musical style than their current metalcore style back then, until a solid source is found for the genres of these albums, no genre will be stated. This will also slim down the vandalism that is occuring on there. Is this okay with you? \u2022  +++$+++ I made a decision to remove the genres from their first two albums, in the consideration of me being an Underoath fan I've seen numerous soucres stating they had a completely different musical style than their current metalcore style back then, until a solid source is found for the genres of these albums, no genre will be stated. This will also slim down the vandalism that is occuring on there. Is this okay with you? • [[User:Gunmetal Angel|<font face="papyrus"><font color="#green">GunMetal Angel</font></font>]] 03:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
4732 +++$+++ Gunmetal Angel +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4731 +++$+++ 4731 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.257506220E09 +++$+++ ...Err, response? \u2022  +++$+++ :...Err, response? • [[User:Gunmetal Angel|<font face="papyrus"><font color="#green">GunMetal Angel</font></font>]] 03:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
4733 +++$+++ Gunmetal Angel +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4731 +++$+++ 4732 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.257553080E09 +++$+++ Okay, just wanted to make sure if you were. --  +++$+++ ::Okay, just wanted to make sure if you were. -- [[User:Gunmetal Angel|<font face="papyrus"><font color="#green">GunMetal Angel</font></font>]] 16:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

529022 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-18 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.198044060E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> Cheers, ''' +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> Cheers, '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 22:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
529023 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529022 +++$+++ 529022 +++$+++ 2007-12-19 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.198052700E09 +++$+++ Is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know&diff=next&oldid=178837724 this] wording better? I know winningest is a word, but it seems a little ungainly. Feel free to revert if you prefer the other one. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know&diff=next&oldid=178837724 this] wording better? I know winningest is a word, but it seems a little ungainly. Feel free to revert if you prefer the other one. Cheers, '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 00:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
529024 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529022 +++$+++ 529023 +++$+++ 2007-12-19 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.198053060E09 +++$+++ That's fine. Someone above was hoping that the word \"winningest\" would appear on the main page so people would look up the word and learn something. I was hoping that the main hook would be used instead of the alternative. Qualifying first for 23 straight events is absolutely AWESOME! Every event for the whole 1987 plus some into the next season. WOW! I wish I hadn't provided an alternative.  +++$+++ ::That's fine. Someone above was hoping that the word "winningest" would appear on the main page so people would look up the word and learn something. I was hoping that the main hook would be used instead of the alternative. Qualifying first for 23 straight events is absolutely AWESOME! Every event for the whole 1987 plus some into the next season. WOW! I wish I hadn't provided an alternative. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 00:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
529025 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529022 +++$+++ 529024 +++$+++ 2007-12-19 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.198053240E09 +++$+++ I never saw the alternate, unfortunately. If you provide me it I'll replace it, or you're probably free to do so yourself. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :::I never saw the alternate, unfortunately. If you provide me it I'll replace it, or you're probably free to do so yourself. Cheers, '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 00:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
529026 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529022 +++$+++ 529025 +++$+++ 2007-12-19 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.198053360E09 +++$+++ Ok, I'll change it.  +++$+++ ::::Ok, I'll change it. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 00:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

4736 +++$+++ Uscalldaway +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-12 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.263288660E09 +++$+++ Hi, you say that according to the WP:MOS the second D in DevilDriver is not capitalized? Can you show me where it says this?  Because everywhere (on their WP page, on their logo, on their site, etc.) it has the second D capitalized.  That is how the name is spelled.  +++$+++ Hi, you say that according to the WP:MOS the second D in DevilDriver is not capitalized? Can you show me where it says this?  Because everywhere (on their WP page, on their logo, on their site, etc.) it has the second D capitalized.  That is how the name is spelled. [[User:Uscalldaway|yes]] ([[User talk:Uscalldaway|talk]]) 01:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
4737 +++$+++ Uscalldaway +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4736 +++$+++ 4736 +++$+++ 2010-01-13 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.263373560E09 +++$+++ I see this, but it is not just their logo, or album artwork, but themselves that call them that too.  See on [http:\/\/www.devildriver.com\/ their official site] how the article headlines have it spelled that way.  +++$+++ :I see this, but it is not just their logo, or album artwork, but themselves that call them that too.  See on [http://www.devildriver.com/ their official site] how the article headlines have it spelled that way. [[User:Uscalldaway|yes]] ([[User talk:Uscalldaway|talk]]) 01:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

4738 +++$+++ Rockgenre +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4738 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-13 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.263447900E09 +++$+++ Hello, I believe you and I haven't really talked together all that much on this site, but you seem to be a very good editor in your field. I have noticed that we both have been attacked several times personally by Ibarnoff24. I believe this has been going on for too long. He is also constantly removing source info.  +++$+++ Hello, I believe you and I haven't really talked together all that much on this site, but you seem to be a very good editor in your field. I have noticed that we both have been attacked several times personally by Ibarnoff24. I believe this has been going on for too long. He is also constantly removing source info. [[User:Rockgenre|RG]] ([[User talk:Rockgenre|talk]]) 21:45, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
4739 +++$+++ Rockgenre +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4738 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.263554640E09 +++$+++ See what [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_nu_metal_bands&diff=337670027&oldid=337112211 stunning terms of endearment] Mr. Ibaranoff has for us today?  +++$+++ :::See what [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_nu_metal_bands&diff=337670027&oldid=337112211 stunning terms of endearment] Mr. Ibaranoff has for us today? [[User:Rockgenre|RG]] ([[User talk:Rockgenre|talk]])03:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

4740 +++$+++ Danteferno +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4740 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-17 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.263793800E09 +++$+++ [[Melodic black metal]] is \"not a real\" genre, huh? Then why does the MusicMight page\/link mention it, and why is it a genre MusicMight page uses to categorize bands, including [[Agathodaimon (band)]]? And please tell me how [[Agathodaimon (band)]] is straight \"[[black metal]]\", compared to bands that play the genre in its purist form. Are [[Dimmu Borgir]] and [[Old Man's Child]] just plain black metal, too? -- +++$+++ [[Melodic black metal]] is "not a real" genre, huh? Then why does the MusicMight page/link mention it, and why is it a genre MusicMight page uses to categorize bands, including [[Agathodaimon (band)]]? And please tell me how [[Agathodaimon (band)]] is straight "[[black metal]]", compared to bands that play the genre in its purist form. Are [[Dimmu Borgir]] and [[Old Man's Child]] just plain black metal, too? --[[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] ([[User talk:Danteferno|talk]]) 21:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
4741 +++$+++ Danteferno +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4740 +++$+++ 4740 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.263794040E09 +++$+++ Where is this \"consensus\"? Please tell me! There's nothing in the above band's talk page, it's really just you pushing your POV, and looking at your own talk page, it seems you do this on other articles with other editors! -- +++$+++ :Where is this "consensus"? Please tell me! There's nothing in the above band's talk page, it's really just you pushing your POV, and looking at your own talk page, it seems you do this on other articles with other editors! --[[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] ([[User talk:Danteferno|talk]]) 21:54, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
4742 +++$+++ Danteferno +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4740 +++$+++ 4741 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.263794640E09 +++$+++ The \"melodic black metal\" page wasn't deleted, it was redirected to the black metal article, and that was the consensus. You still haven't answered my question: Please explain how Agathodaimon are pure \"black metal\". They've been tagged as melodic black metal AND symphonic black metal (which has its own article) by reliable sources and you seem to be the only person who thinks otherwise. -- +++$+++ ::The "melodic black metal" page wasn't deleted, it was redirected to the black metal article, and that was the consensus. You still haven't answered my question: Please explain how Agathodaimon are pure "black metal". They've been tagged as melodic black metal AND symphonic black metal (which has its own article) by reliable sources and you seem to be the only person who thinks otherwise. --[[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] ([[User talk:Danteferno|talk]]) 22:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
4743 +++$+++ Danteferno +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4740 +++$+++ 4742 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.263795180E09 +++$+++ There's nary any more debate at this point. To prevent 3RR, I'll be putting melodic black and gothic metal back in the article in a few days; if you revert, then it's not only POV pushing but also blanking of sourced information. -- +++$+++ :::There's nary any more debate at this point. To prevent 3RR, I'll be putting melodic black and gothic metal back in the article in a few days; if you revert, then it's not only POV pushing but also blanking of sourced information. --[[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] ([[User talk:Danteferno|talk]]) 22:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
4744 +++$+++ Danteferno +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4740 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.263796800E09 +++$+++ And wait, it just gets better: there are more off-site references that prove the above band isn't plain \"black metal\" They're also listed as black metal AND [[gothic metal]] [http:\/\/www.roadrunnerrecords.com\/blabbermouth.Net\/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=114116 here], a site which (coincidentally) is also used as references on the [[List of melodic death metal bands]] page, an article you also seem keen on \"enforcing\" with references. If the above site link (or [[Allmusic]]) isn't \"good enough\" to you and you revert, I'm gonna start to wonder why those same sites are used repeatedly on the latter band list article.-- +++$+++ :::::And wait, it just gets better: there are more off-site references that prove the above band isn't plain "black metal" They're also listed as black metal AND [[gothic metal]] [http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.Net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=114116 here], a site which (coincidentally) is also used as references on the [[List of melodic death metal bands]] page, an article you also seem keen on "enforcing" with references. If the above site link (or [[Allmusic]]) isn't "good enough" to you and you revert, I'm gonna start to wonder why those same sites are used repeatedly on the latter band list article.--[[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] ([[User talk:Danteferno|talk]]) 22:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
4745 +++$+++ Danteferno +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4740 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.263797460E09 +++$+++ No objections? -- +++$+++ :::::: No objections? --[[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] ([[User talk:Danteferno|talk]]) 22:51, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
4746 +++$+++ Danteferno +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4740 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.263800040E09 +++$+++ Based on your last edit to the article, I guess there's no more objections then. Look, as far as these back-and-forth missives and reverts go between you and I, let's make this incident the last, OK? Wikipedia gives editors the option to include \"{{Fact|reason=dateDecember 2010}}\" or templates seeking more info. Outright removal of content should only be relegated to stop obvious vandal edits or edits with obviously INCORRECT information (i.e., if someone added [[Avenged Sevenfold]] to the melodic death metal bands list), you know, stuff that doesn't require any debate. Or if something might be in dispute as truthful, sure. But in this case you apparently agreed with all the points I mentioned, it was just an issue regarding the source - so rather than revert, why not pursue independent research OR add a temporary \"{{Fact|reason=dateDecember 2010}}\" tag? There are certainly topics that require prolonged debates; band genres, however, shouldn't be one of them. Ciao, -- +++$+++ :::::::Based on your last edit to the article, I guess there's no more objections then. Look, as far as these back-and-forth missives and reverts go between you and I, let's make this incident the last, OK? Wikipedia gives editors the option to include "{{Fact|reason=dateDecember 2010}}" or templates seeking more info. Outright removal of content should only be relegated to stop obvious vandal edits or edits with obviously INCORRECT information (i.e., if someone added [[Avenged Sevenfold]] to the melodic death metal bands list), you know, stuff that doesn't require any debate. Or if something might be in dispute as truthful, sure. But in this case you apparently agreed with all the points I mentioned, it was just an issue regarding the source - so rather than revert, why not pursue independent research OR add a temporary "{{Fact|reason=dateDecember 2010}}" tag? There are certainly topics that require prolonged debates; band genres, however, shouldn't be one of them. Ciao, --[[User:Danteferno|Danteferno]] ([[User talk:Danteferno|talk]]) 23:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

525078 +++$+++ Aguerriero +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525078 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-18 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.153267500E09 +++$+++ I am mediating another case right now, on the article [[Rainbow Gathering]].  Another mediator recommended that I ask for help from an admin on something, so I am asking you.  The mediation has been rough, mostly due to anon edit wars on both the article and talk page, which include accusations of vandalism and other nastiness.  Would you be willing to semi-protect the page during the mediation, so I can sort out and track who is doing what?  If not, I understand - can't hurt to ask, right?  Thanks --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ I am mediating another case right now, on the article [[Rainbow Gathering]].  Another mediator recommended that I ask for help from an admin on something, so I am asking you.  The mediation has been rough, mostly due to anon edit wars on both the article and talk page, which include accusations of vandalism and other nastiness.  Would you be willing to semi-protect the page during the mediation, so I can sort out and track who is doing what?  If not, I understand - can't hurt to ask, right?  Thanks --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Aguerriero|Aguerriero]] ([[User_talk:Aguerriero|talk]])</font> 17:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
525079 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525078 +++$+++ 525078 +++$+++ 2006-07-18 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.153268040E09 +++$+++ Done. -- +++$+++ :Done. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 17:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

306625 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ -5- +++$+++ 306625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-10 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.292035980E09 +++$+++ Ok then you don't have to tell me. I know you know what's your doing and trust your judgement. \u2212  +++$+++ Ok then you don't have to tell me. I know you know what's your doing and trust your judgement. − [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 18:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
306626 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ -5- +++$+++ 306625 +++$+++ 306625 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.292123880E09 +++$+++ It's rare for [[Superhero Hype!]] to be the original source of reporting. They a lot of times get information they already heard. \u2212  +++$+++ :It's rare for [[Superhero Hype!]] to be the original source of reporting. They a lot of times get information they already heard. − [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 19:18, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

612460 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-02 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.165094760E09 +++$+++ I've combined the two descriptions of his thoughts after reading Malthus, to try and give full detail of his insight (one of the things in the peer review was \"not enough on the development of his theory\"). God that article was full of a lot of repetition, though: I'd already removed a bunch.  +++$+++ I've combined the two descriptions of his thoughts after reading Malthus, to try and give full detail of his insight (one of the things in the peer review was "not enough on the development of his theory"). God that article was full of a lot of repetition, though: I'd already removed a bunch. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 13:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
612461 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612460 +++$+++ 612460 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.165095000E09 +++$+++ I've just noticed I wrote \"It's possibly the most ''possible'' incident in his life\" for \"possibly the most ''important''\", so I may be more caught in the toils of flu than I thought. Check I haven't done anything stupid, and smooth out the text?  +++$+++ :I've just noticed I wrote "It's possibly the most ''possible'' incident in his life" for "possibly the most ''important''", so I may be more caught in the toils of flu than I thought. Check I haven't done anything stupid, and smooth out the text? [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 13:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
612462 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612460 +++$+++ 612461 +++$+++ 2006-12-03 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.165195380E09 +++$+++ Good point: have found [http:\/\/darwin-online.org.uk\/darwin.html John van Wyhe] as source and rephrased a bit to get closer to originals: Darwin's explanation is more concise, but yours explains better. ..  +++$+++ ::Good point: have found [http://darwin-online.org.uk/darwin.html John van Wyhe] as source and rephrased a bit to get closer to originals: Darwin's explanation is more concise, but yours explains better. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

266890 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-20 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.177096320E09 +++$+++ Please don't leave Wikipedia! Of course I won't close the case if you don't want me to. And I'll talk to Fred Bauder for you. I've replied to your email. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Please don't leave Wikipedia! Of course I won't close the case if you don't want me to. And I'll talk to Fred Bauder for you. I've replied to your email. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 12:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
266891 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266890 +++$+++ 266890 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.177112820E09 +++$+++ Replied to your email. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Replied to your email. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 16:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

4747 +++$+++ Creation7689 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-26 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.267225680E09 +++$+++ Why did you remove my comment from your page? What was the reason for that?  +++$+++ Why did you remove my comment from your page? What was the reason for that? [[User:Creation7689|Creation7689]] ([[User talk:Creation7689|talk]]) 15:08, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
4748 +++$+++ Creation7689 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4747 +++$+++ 4747 +++$+++ 2010-02-26 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.267234440E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that speedy deletion thing. My brother was messing with my wikipedia.   +++$+++ :Sorry about that speedy deletion thing. My brother was messing with my wikipedia.  [[User:Creation7689|Creation7689]] ([[User talk:Creation7689|talk]]) 17:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

4750 +++$+++ SatyrTN +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4750 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-16 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.268724660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help! -- <span style=\"background: #EECCFF;\"> +++$+++ Thanks for your help! -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">[[User:SatyrTN|SatyrTN]] <small>([[User talk:SatyrTN|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/SatyrTN|contribs]])</small></span> 00:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
4751 +++$+++ SatyrTN +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4750 +++$+++ 4750 +++$+++ 2010-03-26 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.269603600E09 +++$+++ Ping? -- <span style=\"background: #EECCFF;\"> +++$+++ :Ping? -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">[[User:SatyrTN|SatyrTN]] <small>([[User talk:SatyrTN|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/SatyrTN|contribs]])</small></span> 04:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

266895 +++$+++ 23skidoo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-22 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.177294380E09 +++$+++ Please explain your edit summary statement regarding material I added being placed over top of something else? I wasn't adding any information under the book citation reference, but simply adding material to the paragraph.  +++$+++ Please explain your edit summary statement regarding material I added being placed over top of something else? I wasn't adding any information under the book citation reference, but simply adding material to the paragraph. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 19:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
266896 +++$+++ 23skidoo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266895 +++$+++ 266895 +++$+++ 2007-04-22 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.177294860E09 +++$+++ You certainly shouldn't have removed the reference in [[Rock the Joint]] - you rendered the article completely unreferenced by doing so. I have put it back. And I am also adding the reference desired to the [[Essex Records]] article, however I ran into a cut-and-paste problem so I need to redo it.  +++$+++ * You certainly shouldn't have removed the reference in [[Rock the Joint]] - you rendered the article completely unreferenced by doing so. I have put it back. And I am also adding the reference desired to the [[Essex Records]] article, however I ran into a cut-and-paste problem so I need to redo it. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 19:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

4754 +++$+++ J04n +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-05 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.270519320E09 +++$+++ Tarring and feathering may be appropriate...but tough to do via a computer.  Is the comment in reference to the Kid Rock or Nu metal discussion (or both).  <font face=\"Century Gothic\"> +++$+++ Tarring and feathering may be appropriate...but tough to do via a computer.  Is the comment in reference to the Kid Rock or Nu metal discussion (or both).  <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</font> 19:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
4755 +++$+++ J04n +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4754 +++$+++ 4754 +++$+++ 2010-04-05 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.270520520E09 +++$+++ Perhaps all mention of genre should be removed from Wikipedia :) <font face=\"Century Gothic\"> +++$+++ :Perhaps all mention of genre should be removed from Wikipedia :) <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</font> 19:22, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

44483 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-23 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.285297620E09 +++$+++ You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  +++$+++ You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:07, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
44484 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44483 +++$+++ 44483 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.285297740E09 +++$+++ Whoa, I says, while I'm pondering the contribution above this notice. Happy days to you!  +++$+++ *Whoa, I says, while I'm pondering the contribution above this notice. Happy days to you! [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
44485 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44483 +++$+++ 44484 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.285298580E09 +++$+++ You'll never know. With any luck, I'll never know again. -  +++$+++ **You'll never know. With any luck, I'll never know again. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 20:23, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

266903 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-23 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.177380120E09 +++$+++ You've done everything you can. I've left a message on his talk page asking him to accept your apology. But like Aeon said above, it's really better if we all move on and leave this dispute behind. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ You've done everything you can. I've left a message on his talk page asking him to accept your apology. But like Aeon said above, it's really better if we all move on and leave this dispute behind. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 19:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
266904 +++$+++ Thatcher131 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266903 +++$+++ 266903 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.177543860E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, it is rude and deceptive to edit someone else's talk page comments.  Please undo your recent edits to Fred's talk page.  +++$+++ :Mattisse, it is rude and deceptive to edit someone else's talk page comments.  Please undo your recent edits to Fred's talk page. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 16:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

529048 +++$+++  +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-24 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.198505220E09 +++$+++ I have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=179914763&oldid=179909141 undone your edit].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=179914763&oldid=179909141 undone your edit].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTD]]) </small> 06:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
529049 +++$+++  +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529048 +++$+++ 529048 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.198665180E09 +++$+++ No problem.  However, if you have a chance take a look at the article.  It is currently at [[WP:FLC]] and needs some support ad [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/List of United States business school rankings]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :No problem.  However, if you have a chance take a look at the article.  It is currently at [[WP:FLC]] and needs some support ad [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of United States business school rankings]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTD]]) </small> 02:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
529050 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529048 +++$+++ 529048 +++$+++ 2007-12-25 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.198590000E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I wish a Merry Christmas to everyone that celebrates this holiday, and a good day to those that do not!  +++$+++ :Thank you! I wish a Merry Christmas to everyone that celebrates this holiday, and a good day to those that do not! [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 05:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

4763 +++$+++ Rzrscm +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-15 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.276668600E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Rzrscm|rzrscm]] ([[User talk:Rzrscm|talk]]) 23:10, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
4764 +++$+++ Rzrscm +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4763 +++$+++ 4763 +++$+++ 2010-06-17 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.276778580E09 +++$+++ Ah...Thanks for telling me...I'll be removing it from other band's articles if I see it.  +++$+++ :Ah...Thanks for telling me...I'll be removing it from other band's articles if I see it. [[User:Rzrscm|rzrscm]] ([[User talk:Rzrscm|talk]]) 05:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

529053 +++$+++ Masterpiece2000 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-25 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.198620420E09 +++$+++ Hello Royalbroil. Merry Christmas! The article Max-Planck-Institute of Quantum Optics, which I substantially expanded appeared in the DYK section. [[User:Stone]] also deserves credit for it. He created the article. Please inform about it in his talk page. Regards,  +++$+++ Hello Royalbroil. Merry Christmas! The article Max-Planck-Institute of Quantum Optics, which I substantially expanded appeared in the DYK section. [[User:Stone]] also deserves credit for it. He created the article. Please inform about it in his talk page. Regards, [[User:Masterpiece2000|Masterpiece2000]] ([[User talk:Masterpiece2000|talk]]) 14:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
529054 +++$+++ Masterpiece2000 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529053 +++$+++ 529053 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.198673400E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ :Thank you. [[User:Masterpiece2000|Masterpiece2000]] ([[User talk:Masterpiece2000|talk]]) 04:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

266910 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266910 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-25 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.177556460E09 +++$+++ P.S. I  can no longer locate my case any more. I believe you or someone gave me a link  to it not long ago, but it is lost in so many emails. I should just dump my emails out as I have too many and can't find anything.   +++$+++ P.S. I  can no longer locate my case any more. I believe you or someone gave me a link  to it not long ago, but it is lost in so many emails. I should just dump my emails out as I have too many and can't find anything.  [[User:Mattisse|HeadlessJeff]] 20:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
266911 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266910 +++$+++ 266910 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.177556580E09 +++$+++ I provided the link above. It's at [[Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance\/Requests\/November 2006\/Mattisse]]. The situation isn't hopeless, and I apologise if I implied that in my emails. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :I provided the link above. It's at [[Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/November 2006/Mattisse]]. The situation isn't hopeless, and I apologise if I implied that in my emails. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:ASSIST|Need some help?]]</font></sup></small></font> 20:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
266912 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266910 +++$+++ 266911 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.177556700E09 +++$+++ I'm happy to continue the conversation here. I did see your reply, and answered it above. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::I'm happy to continue the conversation here. I did see your reply, and answered it above. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:ASSIST|Need some help?]]</font></sup></small></font> 20:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

4767 +++$+++ Ostalocutanje +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4767 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-03 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.278179520E09 +++$+++ I noticed you removed Pero Defformero from the list of folk metal bands and artists. What is the problem with this band?  +++$+++ I noticed you removed Pero Defformero from the list of folk metal bands and artists. What is the problem with this band? [[User:Ostalocutanje|Ostalocutanje]] ([[User talk:Ostalocutanje|talk]]) 10:52, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
4768 +++$+++ Ostalocutanje +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4767 +++$+++ 4767 +++$+++ 2010-07-03 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.278184200E09 +++$+++ Yes, I know that. My question actually is: what's the problem with the source?  +++$+++ :Yes, I know that. My question actually is: what's the problem with the source? [[User:Ostalocutanje|Ostalocutanje]] ([[User talk:Ostalocutanje|talk]]) 12:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

4771 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4771 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-02 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.283427240E09 +++$+++ Why is it that every time I get a note from you, someone ends up getting an indefinite block? BTW, I met your cousin, [[User:Blackmetlabaz]], and he's nothing like you. But I guess he won't be around for long. Toodles,  +++$+++ Why is it that every time I get a note from you, someone ends up getting an indefinite block? BTW, I met your cousin, [[User:Blackmetlabaz]], and he's nothing like you. But I guess he won't be around for long. Toodles, [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 04:34, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
4772 +++$+++ Regancy42 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4771 +++$+++ 4771 +++$+++ 2010-09-02 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.283450400E09 +++$+++ You have another fan [[User:Blackmetallbaz]]- +++$+++ :You have another fan [[User:Blackmetallbaz]]-[[User:Regancy42|Regancy42]] ([[User talk:Regancy42|talk]]) 11:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

266916 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-26 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.177580880E09 +++$+++ The best advice I can think of is: Please avoid all the articles, discussions where you feel other users are involved who you think you have issues or who you think are stalking you. Concentrate only on totally different areas such as History of India related articles, like assisting Dinesh on writing FAs. That assisting will also provide a way to write your own articles which could act as sub-articles for the FA main article, and there by contributing to DYKs. I see that you have quite a few interesting DYKs, and all of them are through your non-controversial side of contributions. [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not a battleground]], and we all are here to write an encyclopedia. I am sure those who you think are stalking, will not trouble if you start avoiding them. Honestly, I am totally unaware of what are the articles and discussions that resulted in your frustration to leave. But instead of leaving completely the project, you can leave whichever you feel bad, and work on those things whichever you feel good and safe and secure to contribute. I hope, this helps. Thanks! -  +++$+++ The best advice I can think of is: Please avoid all the articles, discussions where you feel other users are involved who you think you have issues or who you think are stalking you. Concentrate only on totally different areas such as History of India related articles, like assisting Dinesh on writing FAs. That assisting will also provide a way to write your own articles which could act as sub-articles for the FA main article, and there by contributing to DYKs. I see that you have quite a few interesting DYKs, and all of them are through your non-controversial side of contributions. [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not a battleground]], and we all are here to write an encyclopedia. I am sure those who you think are stalking, will not trouble if you start avoiding them. Honestly, I am totally unaware of what are the articles and discussions that resulted in your frustration to leave. But instead of leaving completely the project, you can leave whichever you feel bad, and work on those things whichever you feel good and safe and secure to contribute. I hope, this helps. Thanks! - [[User:KNM|KNM]] <sup> '''[[:User_talk:KNM|Talk]]'''</sup> 02:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
266917 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266916 +++$+++ 266916 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.177582800E09 +++$+++ As a second step, take a topic, preferably something similar to your previous DYKs, which are completely non-controversial. You can take some work load from Dinesh. He can tell you what is in his plate for next few days or few weeks. Start writing articles on those areas, and produce some good DYKs like you have done in the past. OK? Thanks for coming back, and I wish you all the best. -  +++$+++ :As a second step, take a topic, preferably something similar to your previous DYKs, which are completely non-controversial. You can take some work load from Dinesh. He can tell you what is in his plate for next few days or few weeks. Start writing articles on those areas, and produce some good DYKs like you have done in the past. OK? Thanks for coming back, and I wish you all the best. - [[User:KNM|KNM]] <sup> '''[[:User_talk:KNM|Talk]]'''</sup> 03:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
266918 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266916 +++$+++ 266917 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.177585080E09 +++$+++ If you do not have any plans of starting a new article, then I suggest, and request, to you to copyedit and cleanup articles such as [[History of Karnataka]], [[Rajkumar]], [[Geography of Karnataka]]. By the way, I have my eyes on your contrib log! :-)  -  +++$+++ ::If you do not have any plans of starting a new article, then I suggest, and request, to you to copyedit and cleanup articles such as [[History of Karnataka]], [[Rajkumar]], [[Geography of Karnataka]]. By the way, I have my eyes on your contrib log! :-)  - [[User:KNM|KNM]] <sup> '''[[:User_talk:KNM|Talk]]'''</sup> 03:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

4773 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-17 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.287341640E09 +++$+++ Hi, could you please explain what is [[WP:VANDALISM]] about this edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Beno%C3%AEt_Mandelbrot&diff=391221851&oldid=391218804 http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Beno%C3%AEt_Mandelbrot&diff=391221851&oldid=391218804] , thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, could you please explain what is [[WP:VANDALISM]] about this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beno%C3%AEt_Mandelbrot&diff=391221851&oldid=391218804 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beno%C3%AEt_Mandelbrot&diff=391221851&oldid=391218804] , thanks. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 11:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
4774 +++$+++  +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4773 +++$+++ 4773 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Sorry, there appears to have been an edit conflict... the vandalism I was trying to remove was the \"he secretly liked Nazis\" bit; the recent death tag removal is not vandalism, although inappropriate, particularly given the above Nazi addition from an IP. 12:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ :Sorry, there appears to have been an edit conflict... the vandalism I was trying to remove was the "he secretly liked Nazis" bit; the recent death tag removal is not vandalism, although inappropriate, particularly given the above Nazi addition from an IP. 12:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
4775 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4773 +++$+++ 4774 +++$+++ 2010-10-17 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.287342240E09 +++$+++ Ah, Ok thanks. I think the IP edit is reflective of the removal of all protection from the article and if it is repeated I suggest semi protection. As for the death, it is a simple issue and the template has little value imo but it is easy to leave it there for another day or two, thanks.  +++$+++ ::Ah, Ok thanks. I think the IP edit is reflective of the removal of all protection from the article and if it is repeated I suggest semi protection. As for the death, it is a simple issue and the template has little value imo but it is easy to leave it there for another day or two, thanks. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 12:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

529062 +++$+++ Dark Gravity +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-30 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.199024280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dark Gravity|Dark Gravity]] ([[User talk:Dark Gravity|talk]]) 06:18, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
529063 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529062 +++$+++ 529062 +++$+++ 2007-12-30 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.199050920E09 +++$+++ Replied with userspace sandbox suggestion and an apology at Dark Gravity's talk page.  +++$+++ :Replied with userspace sandbox suggestion and an apology at Dark Gravity's talk page. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 13:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

471527 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-02 10:16:00 +++$+++ 1.186074960E09 +++$+++ I've responded to your blanket statement regarding G12 on the Non-free content talk page. I really would appreciate a specific response to the question about [[:Image:WW2 Iwo Jima flag raising.jpg]], which most definitely ''is'' on the Corbis website. This demonstrates that mere presence on a image library's website is not enough for G12. You have to know who owns the picture.  +++$+++ I've responded to your blanket statement regarding G12 on the Non-free content talk page. I really would appreciate a specific response to the question about [[:Image:WW2 Iwo Jima flag raising.jpg]], which most definitely ''is'' on the Corbis website. This demonstrates that mere presence on a image library's website is not enough for G12. You have to know who owns the picture. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 10:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
471528 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471527 +++$+++ 471527 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.186096740E09 +++$+++ Has there been any serious question that a photograph that we have an entire article devoted to does not meet our [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]] criteria for that article?  If there is, I'd be happy to have a conversation about that with whoever is concerned.   +++$+++ :Has there been any serious question that a photograph that we have an entire article devoted to does not meet our [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]] criteria for that article?  If there is, I'd be happy to have a conversation about that with whoever is concerned.  [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 16:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
471529 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471527 +++$+++ 471528 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.186097760E09 +++$+++ I don't have a problem with this image, but people are inconsistently applying the standards. Please review and contribute to the continuing discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Non-free content#The Corbis\/Getty argument]]. In that thread, you said \"images owned by companies\" - it is the definition of \"owned\" here that is disputed.  +++$+++ ::I don't have a problem with this image, but people are inconsistently applying the standards. Please review and contribute to the continuing discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Non-free content#The Corbis/Getty argument]]. In that thread, you said "images owned by companies" - it is the definition of "owned" here that is disputed. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 16:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
471530 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471527 +++$+++ 471529 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.186101240E09 +++$+++ Oftentimes, as useful as blanket rules are, there are going to be exceptions to them, which is why we have a tradition of using discussion as a means towards informed consensus.  While it is true that Wikimedians are not necessarily going to always arrive at the right conclusion, and we're not really set up to evaluate claims of copyright ownership with perfect confidence, a conservative stance coupled with taking the time to discuss things remains the best approach we have to working things out on the project level.  I'll note that [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] appears to be a terrible forum for working this sort of thing out, however, due to the tradition of mindless vote-counting there.   +++$+++ :::Oftentimes, as useful as blanket rules are, there are going to be exceptions to them, which is why we have a tradition of using discussion as a means towards informed consensus.  While it is true that Wikimedians are not necessarily going to always arrive at the right conclusion, and we're not really set up to evaluate claims of copyright ownership with perfect confidence, a conservative stance coupled with taking the time to discuss things remains the best approach we have to working things out on the project level.  I'll note that [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] appears to be a terrible forum for working this sort of thing out, however, due to the tradition of mindless vote-counting there.  [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 17:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

529065 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529065 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-31 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.199131860E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I'm not real clear on the protocol at [[T:DYK]] but does [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=181142177 your removal] of one of my hooks mean there was something wrong with it?  If so, may I ask what so I don't repeat it?  Thanks.  \u2014 +++$+++ Hi.  I'm not real clear on the protocol at [[T:DYK]] but does [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=181142177 your removal] of one of my hooks mean there was something wrong with it?  If so, may I ask what so I don't repeat it?  Thanks.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 12:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
529066 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529065 +++$+++ 529065 +++$+++ 2007-12-31 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.199138100E09 +++$+++ Ah, no apology necessary!  I was just wondering if I'd done something wrong.  Thanks for clearing that up.  :)  \u2014 +++$+++ :Ah, no apology necessary!  I was just wondering if I'd done something wrong.  Thanks for clearing that up.  :)  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 13:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

266922 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266922 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-26 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.177603380E09 +++$+++ Looking at your contribs log, as I had mentioned to you earlier, you certainly need to stop talking to few people, if you want to divert your mind peacefully to somewhere else, on your contributions. So, my request to you now specifically, is to stop posting messages to [[User:Jefferson Anderson]] and [[User:Fred Bauder]]. Also, your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:KNM&diff=126050427&oldid=126041808 this particular message] on my talk page was, for most part of it, unnecessary. I am emphasizing again that, unless you completely ignore whatever that happened in the past with '''them''', it would be extremely difficult for you to continue peacefully. There is no point continuing the same stuff forever. So, please listen to my words, as you had agreed upon. Stopping the communication with Jefferson and Fred, would be a significant first step. I am confident and have faith that, they wont communicate with you unless you goto their talk pages. Have a good day, and I would like to see some new article or some good copyedit on the articles I mentioned above. Thanks -  +++$+++ Looking at your contribs log, as I had mentioned to you earlier, you certainly need to stop talking to few people, if you want to divert your mind peacefully to somewhere else, on your contributions. So, my request to you now specifically, is to stop posting messages to [[User:Jefferson Anderson]] and [[User:Fred Bauder]]. Also, your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KNM&diff=126050427&oldid=126041808 this particular message] on my talk page was, for most part of it, unnecessary. I am emphasizing again that, unless you completely ignore whatever that happened in the past with '''them''', it would be extremely difficult for you to continue peacefully. There is no point continuing the same stuff forever. So, please listen to my words, as you had agreed upon. Stopping the communication with Jefferson and Fred, would be a significant first step. I am confident and have faith that, they wont communicate with you unless you goto their talk pages. Have a good day, and I would like to see some new article or some good copyedit on the articles I mentioned above. Thanks - [[User:KNM|KNM]] <sup> '''[[:User_talk:KNM|Talk]]'''</sup> 09:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
266923 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266922 +++$+++ 266922 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.177615260E09 +++$+++ Sorry. I was just trying to explain as you did not seem to understand from your last post. I cannot edit again until this problem is fixed. Editing, like Dinesh's last article, is what got me into trouble this time. I apologise for my post to you. Sincerely,   +++$+++ :Sorry. I was just trying to explain as you did not seem to understand from your last post. I cannot edit again until this problem is fixed. Editing, like Dinesh's last article, is what got me into trouble this time. I apologise for my post to you. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 12:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

529067 +++$+++ Benjiboi +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-31 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.199139360E09 +++$+++ Hi, I know that DYK is often thankless backroom stuff so here is an official thank you!!!  +++$+++ Hi, I know that DYK is often thankless backroom stuff so here is an official thank you!!! [[User talk:Benjiboi|Benjiboi]] 14:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
529068 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529067 +++$+++ 529067 +++$+++ 2007-12-31 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.199139540E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the thoughts. I benefited from DYK for a long time before I became an admin, so I understand how important it is to some contributors.  +++$+++ :I appreciate the thoughts. I benefited from DYK for a long time before I became an admin, so I understand how important it is to some contributors. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 14:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

88178 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Redtigerxyz +++$+++ 88178 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-19 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.305848280E09 +++$+++ Great work. Thanks!  +++$+++ Great work. Thanks! [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:38, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
88179 +++$+++ Nmisra +++$+++ Redtigerxyz +++$+++ 88178 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.306024740E09 +++$+++ Reply on [[Talk:Ahalya]].  +++$+++ ::Reply on [[Talk:Ahalya]]. [[User:Nmisra|Nmisra]] ([[User talk:Nmisra|talk]]) 17:39, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

4782 +++$+++ 3family6 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4782 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-08 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.294526040E09 +++$+++ I have a reply with my findings on use of flagicons in lists posted on [[Talk:List of Christian metal bands#Flagicons]]. Please take a look.-- +++$+++ I have a reply with my findings on use of flagicons in lists posted on [[Talk:List of Christian metal bands#Flagicons]]. Please take a look.--[[User:3family6|3family6]] ([[User talk:3family6|talk]]) 14:34, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
4783 +++$+++ 3family6 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4782 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.296022080E09 +++$+++ Not only does your argument violate policy, it doesn't even hold water. One of the sources for Dying Fetus as hardcore is by [[MusicMight|Gary Sharpe-Young]], a ''heavy metal'' writer and journalist.-- +++$+++ :::Not only does your argument violate policy, it doesn't even hold water. One of the sources for Dying Fetus as hardcore is by [[MusicMight|Gary Sharpe-Young]], a ''heavy metal'' writer and journalist.--[[User:3family6|3family6]] ([[User talk:3family6|talk]]) 22:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

572653 +++$+++ Fixbeforeigo +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 572653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-16 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.134743700E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't remove anything unilaterally; to clarify what I was referring to (which, if anything, would be 'adding' to what is displayed), is to change anything like <nowiki>[[Medford, Oregon|Medford, OR]]<\/nowiki> to just <nowiki>[[Medford, Oregon]]<\/nowiki>--it's simpler, there are no space constraints in that infobox area necessitating abbreviating information, and mostly, I strongly feel that expecting people in Timbuktu to know that \"OR\" equals \"Oregon\" (same with any of the other two-letter state abbrevs) is fairly US-centric.  +++$+++ I wouldn't remove anything unilaterally; to clarify what I was referring to (which, if anything, would be 'adding' to what is displayed), is to change anything like <nowiki>[[Medford, Oregon|Medford, OR]]</nowiki> to just <nowiki>[[Medford, Oregon]]</nowiki>--it's simpler, there are no space constraints in that infobox area necessitating abbreviating information, and mostly, I strongly feel that expecting people in Timbuktu to know that "OR" equals "Oregon" (same with any of the other two-letter state abbrevs) is fairly US-centric. [[User:Fixbeforeigo|Fixbeforeigo]] 06:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
572654 +++$+++ Fixbeforeigo +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 572653 +++$+++ 572653 +++$+++ 2005-12-16 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.134743700E09 +++$+++ As for the PS, of the many of articles I've editted (mostly as anons) I've seen states spelled out FAR more often than abbreviated.  +++$+++ :As for the PS, of the many of articles I've editted (mostly as anons) I've seen states spelled out FAR more often than abbreviated. [[User:Fixbeforeigo|Fixbeforeigo]] 06:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

4785 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4785 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-07 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.302217260E09 +++$+++ Hey Baz, if you're still around, can you have a look at [[Reborn (band)]] and see if there's something else you can dig up? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hey Baz, if you're still around, can you have a look at [[Reborn (band)]] and see if there's something else you can dig up? Thanks, [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
4786 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4785 +++$+++ 4785 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.302265500E09 +++$+++ I meant dig \"up\", not dig \"out\"! Get me some facts, record deals, shows, reviews--or I'm stripping the \"metal\" out of your name and you'll be [[User:Black-----baz]].  +++$+++ *I meant dig "up", not dig "out"! Get me some facts, record deals, shows, reviews--or I'm stripping the "metal" out of your name and you'll be [[User:Black-----baz]]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 05:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

529075 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529075 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.199285940E09 +++$+++ <font color=\"darkgray\">Hello Royalbroil, I hope you had a pleasant New Year's Day, and that 2008 brings further success, health and happiness! ... Keep on rolling!.... ~ ''' +++$+++ <font color="darkgray">Hello Royalbroil, I hope you had a pleasant New Year's Day, and that 2008 brings further success, health and happiness! ... Keep on rolling!.... ~ '''[[User:Blnguyen|<font color="GoldenRod">Blnguyen</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:Blnguyen|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 06:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
529076 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529075 +++$+++ 529075 +++$+++ 2008-01-02 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.199311140E09 +++$+++ Happy New Year to you and everyone else!  +++$+++ :Happy New Year to you and everyone else! [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 13:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

4788 +++$+++ Magog the Ogre +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-18 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.303130220E09 +++$+++ Please stop edit warring at [[Nokturnal Mortum]], or I will block both you and the person you are edit warring with. For the full text of a proper warning, please see {{tl|uw-3rr}}. Thanks.  +++$+++ Please stop edit warring at [[Nokturnal Mortum]], or I will block both you and the person you are edit warring with. For the full text of a proper warning, please see {{tl|uw-3rr}}. Thanks. [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 05:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
4789 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4788 +++$+++ 4788 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.303184700E09 +++$+++ Regarding your messge, I have not contravened 3RR at any point, and would like to point out that labelling individuals as National Socialists on the basis of extremely dubious sources such as webzines is a major contravention of [[WP:BLP]] as I'm sure you are aware.  +++$+++ :Regarding your messge, I have not contravened 3RR at any point, and would like to point out that labelling individuals as National Socialists on the basis of extremely dubious sources such as webzines is a major contravention of [[WP:BLP]] as I'm sure you are aware. [[User:Blackmetalbaz|Blackmetalbaz]] ([[User talk:Blackmetalbaz|talk]]) 20:45, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

529079 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529079 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.199320500E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 16:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
529080 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529079 +++$+++ 529079 +++$+++ 2008-01-02 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.199321460E09 +++$+++ Delete it at any time. I haven't messed around with fair use images for a long time.  +++$+++ :Delete it at any time. I haven't messed around with fair use images for a long time. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 16:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

266936 +++$+++ Quiddity +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266936 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-27 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.177722780E09 +++$+++ The [[Wikipedia:Village pump]] can most easily be found from the Community portal or Help:Contents page (both linked in the sidebar). -- +++$+++ The [[Wikipedia:Village pump]] can most easily be found from the Community portal or Help:Contents page (both linked in the sidebar). --[[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] 18:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
266937 +++$+++ Quiddity +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266936 +++$+++ 266936 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.177727280E09 +++$+++ No prob. Another tip is to use your browser's \"find\" function in one of those huge list pages (eg [[Help:Contents\/Site map]]). That's the fastest\/only way I can find most things ;) -- +++$+++ :No prob. Another tip is to use your browser's "find" function in one of those huge list pages (eg [[Help:Contents/Site map]]). That's the fastest/only way I can find most things ;) --[[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] 19:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

529081 +++$+++ Scottandrewhutchins +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-03 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.199404980E09 +++$+++ The fact that I even mentioned [[Mishepishu]] may constitute original research.  I was unfamiliar with Mishepishu until I saw the Mythic Creatures exhibit at the [[American Museum of Natural History]], but I found its resemblance to the Hodag remarkable, though it wasn't noted in the display. -- +++$+++ The fact that I even mentioned [[Mishepishu]] may constitute original research.  I was unfamiliar with Mishepishu until I saw the Mythic Creatures exhibit at the [[American Museum of Natural History]], but I found its resemblance to the Hodag remarkable, though it wasn't noted in the display. --[[User:Scottandrewhutchins|Scottandrewhutchins]] ([[User talk:Scottandrewhutchins|talk]]) 16:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
529082 +++$+++ Scottandrewhutchins +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529081 +++$+++ 529081 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.199405100E09 +++$+++ I just did a Google search, and AMNH's website is the first to come up:  http:\/\/www.amnh.org\/exhibitions\/mythiccreatures\/water\/myths.php .  Apparently, \"Mishupishu\" is the more common spelling. -- +++$+++ :I just did a Google search, and AMNH's website is the first to come up:  http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/mythiccreatures/water/myths.php .  Apparently, "Mishupishu" is the more common spelling. --[[User:Scottandrewhutchins|Scottandrewhutchins]] ([[User talk:Scottandrewhutchins|talk]]) 16:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

525087 +++$+++ EyeMD +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-07 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.154970660E09 +++$+++ Could you please add ICD-10 codes for [[Hypertropia]] & hypotropia, along with some other related diagnoses on the page. Thanks a bunch!, in advance :-)  +++$+++ Could you please add ICD-10 codes for [[Hypertropia]] & hypotropia, along with some other related diagnoses on the page. Thanks a bunch!, in advance :-) [[User:EyeMD|EyeMD]] 10:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
525088 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525087 +++$+++ 525087 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.155099000E09 +++$+++ No problem - done. -- +++$+++ :No problem - done. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 21:50, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
525089 +++$+++ EyeMD +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525087 +++$+++ 525088 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.155205320E09 +++$+++ Thanks a ton :-) BTW, Your talk page is frankly, quite huge and needs archival.   +++$+++ :: Thanks a ton :-) BTW, Your talk page is frankly, quite huge and needs archival.  [[User:EyeMD|EyeMD]] 03:22, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

4796 +++$+++ Penyulap +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4796 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.312175160E09 +++$+++ Hi Blackmetalbaz, I saw a note on the ANI and looked at Gothic Forest's talkpage, and it made me wonder if anyone had thought to team up this editor with another editor. There are copyeditors for people who make spelling mistakes, actually there is a whole flipping guide of them on here. Not my thing I can tell you that, my spelling is no good at all. But some people like it. They made a whole guild. I'm wondering if there is a simply way to team up someone else with Gothic Forest, someone who likes looking for references, some people like that too you see. Maybe they'd love to find a list of 'things to do' everytime they sit down at the computer, Gothic Forest would make a perfect assistant for someone I'm sure. Well, I'm sure there is at least a possibility. So is there a project board Gothic Forest can be mentioned on ? Please put any response on my talkpage. Thanks. <span style=\"text-shadow:#c5C3e3  0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ Hi Blackmetalbaz, I saw a note on the ANI and looked at Gothic Forest's talkpage, and it made me wonder if anyone had thought to team up this editor with another editor. There are copyeditors for people who make spelling mistakes, actually there is a whole flipping guide of them on here. Not my thing I can tell you that, my spelling is no good at all. But some people like it. They made a whole guild. I'm wondering if there is a simply way to team up someone else with Gothic Forest, someone who likes looking for references, some people like that too you see. Maybe they'd love to find a list of 'things to do' everytime they sit down at the computer, Gothic Forest would make a perfect assistant for someone I'm sure. Well, I'm sure there is at least a possibility. So is there a project board Gothic Forest can be mentioned on ? Please put any response on my talkpage. Thanks. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3  0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User:Penyulap|<span style="color:#002100">'''Penyulap'''</span>]]</span><sub>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:07AA07">''' talk'''</span>]]</sub> 22:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
4797 +++$+++ Backtable +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4796 +++$+++ 4796 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312196520E09 +++$+++ The ANI that Penyulap is referring to is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#Gothic Forest|here]]. Feel free to post any commentary in mind over there. Also, check out [[User talk:Gothic Forest#Welcome to Wiki|this message]] on Gothic Forest's user talk page posted by Penyulap, if that is important. In my opinion, the message is kind of strange.  +++$+++ :The ANI that Penyulap is referring to is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Gothic Forest|here]]. Feel free to post any commentary in mind over there. Also, check out [[User talk:Gothic Forest#Welcome to Wiki|this message]] on Gothic Forest's user talk page posted by Penyulap, if that is important. In my opinion, the message is kind of strange. [[User:Backtable|<font color = "green">Backtable </font>]]<sub>[[User talk:Backtable|<font color = "brown">Speak to me</font>]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Backtable|<font color = "gray">concerning my deeds.</font>]]</sup> 04:02, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

568778 +++$+++ Jawed3 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568778 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-01 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.157170560E09 +++$+++ Would you please also remove the remaining notices on the Eric M. Jackson article?  I think the AfD vote pretty clearly resolved those issues too.   +++$+++ Would you please also remove the remaining notices on the Eric M. Jackson article?  I think the AfD vote pretty clearly resolved those issues too.  [[User:Jawed3|Jawed3]] 21:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
568779 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568778 +++$+++ 568778 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.157171280E09 +++$+++ Notability and importance tags have been removed from the [[Eric M. Jackson]] article as they were possibly added in bad faith by the proposing editor. <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Notability and importance tags have been removed from the [[Eric M. Jackson]] article as they were possibly added in bad faith by the proposing editor. <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''(aeropa'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''gitica)'''</font>]]</span> 21:28, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

4798 +++$+++ Torchiest +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.312427280E09 +++$+++ Hey, I saw you just undid that IP edit adding [[crust punk]] as a stylistic origin genre from [[grindcore]], but the crust punk article lists grindcore as a derivative genre. <B>\u2014 +++$+++ Hey, I saw you just undid that IP edit adding [[crust punk]] as a stylistic origin genre from [[grindcore]], but the crust punk article lists grindcore as a derivative genre. <B>—[[User:Torchiest|Torchiest]]</B> <sup>[[User talk:Torchiest|talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-3.5ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Torchiest|edits]]</sub> 20:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
4799 +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4798 +++$+++ 4798 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.312475280E09 +++$+++ There has long been consensus regarding the grindcore infobox; we simply don't need any further additions, as the far more general term \"hardcore punk\" is already there. Editors adding to the box without sources and against consensus are simply unhelpful. I'm unaware the same amount of effort has been put into establishing such a consensus on the crust punk page; I mostly monitor that page to make sure no unsourced additions are made to the list of bands.  +++$+++ :There has long been consensus regarding the grindcore infobox; we simply don't need any further additions, as the far more general term "hardcore punk" is already there. Editors adding to the box without sources and against consensus are simply unhelpful. I'm unaware the same amount of effort has been put into establishing such a consensus on the crust punk page; I mostly monitor that page to make sure no unsourced additions are made to the list of bands. [[User:Blackmetalbaz|Blackmetalbaz]] ([[User talk:Blackmetalbaz#top|talk]]) 09:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
4800 +++$+++ Torchiest +++$+++ Blackmetalbaz +++$+++ 4798 +++$+++ 4799 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.312497060E09 +++$+++ Sounds good.  I'm not as knowledgeable about that area of genres so I thought I'd check with you. <B>\u2014 +++$+++ ::Sounds good.  I'm not as knowledgeable about that area of genres so I thought I'd check with you. <B>—[[User:Torchiest|Torchiest]]</B> <sup>[[User talk:Torchiest|talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-3.5ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Torchiest|edits]]</sub> 15:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

266944 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266944 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-20 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.184918940E09 +++$+++ I hope all is well with you Mattisse. ''' +++$+++ I hope all is well with you Mattisse. '''[[User:Blnguyen|<font color="GoldenRod">Blnguyen</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:Blnguyen|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 01:09, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
266945 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266944 +++$+++ 266944 +++$+++ 2007-07-20 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.185000720E09 +++$+++ All is well due to your wonderful roundup of the sockpuppet ring that had been harassing me for so many months. I cannot thank you enough but just wonder how you saw what was happening when no one else seemed to see it. Sincerely,   +++$+++ :All is well due to your wonderful roundup of the sockpuppet ring that had been harassing me for so many months. I cannot thank you enough but just wonder how you saw what was happening when no one else seemed to see it. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 23:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

529090 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-07 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.199777820E09 +++$+++ I started an article about [[Preble, Wisconsin]]; it was badly needed. Is there any noticeable landmarks, etc., in the Preble section of Green Bay??? Thank you- +++$+++ I started an article about [[Preble, Wisconsin]]; it was badly needed. Is there any noticeable landmarks, etc., in the Preble section of Green Bay??? Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 23:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
529091 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529090 +++$+++ 529090 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.199782020E09 +++$+++ The fog in my area has killed my [[WiFi]] internet connection for the last 2 days, and more fog is expected for the next day. Don't expect to see me much for the next day or so.  +++$+++ :The fog in my area has killed my [[WiFi]] internet connection for the last 2 days, and more fog is expected for the next day. Don't expect to see me much for the next day or so. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 00:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
529092 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529090 +++$+++ 529091 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.199784360E09 +++$+++ Many thanks. I did not know there was a [[Preble, Wisconsin]] until a few days ago. +++$+++ ::Many thanks. I did not know there was a [[Preble, Wisconsin]] until a few days ago.[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 01:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

4803 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ J Bar +++$+++ 4803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-08 09:16:00 +++$+++ 1.257700560E09 +++$+++ There are two replies at my talk page.  +++$+++ There are two replies at my talk page. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 09:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
4804 +++$+++ J Bar +++$+++ J Bar +++$+++ 4803 +++$+++ 4803 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.257766500E09 +++$+++ It's not worth getting into yet another edit war, with another editor who prefers things their way. It's almost impossible to get people to agree to a standard and get others to follow it. Enough is enough. I give up.  +++$+++ :It's not worth getting into yet another edit war, with another editor who prefers things their way. It's almost impossible to get people to agree to a standard and get others to follow it. Enough is enough. I give up. [[User:J Bar|J Bar]] ([[User talk:J Bar|talk]]) 03:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

529093 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529093 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-08 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.199849940E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 19:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
529094 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529093 +++$+++ 529093 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.199881680E09 +++$+++ Check out a few posts back. I removed the image from the article so that your metallic computer \"friend\" could delete it easier. I bet you're not going to read my reply either :))   +++$+++ :Check out a few posts back. I removed the image from the article so that your metallic computer "friend" could delete it easier. I bet you're not going to read my reply either :))  [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 04:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

266950 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266950 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-12 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.184285040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] 17:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
266951 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266950 +++$+++ 266950 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.184285460E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 17:11, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

394017 +++$+++ TerryHeaton +++$+++ Kimchi.sg +++$+++ 394017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-19 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.287554460E09 +++$+++ --[[User:TerryHeaton|TerryHeaton]] ([[User talk:TerryHeaton|talk]]) 23:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)-- +++$+++ --[[User:TerryHeaton|TerryHeaton]] ([[User talk:TerryHeaton|talk]]) 23:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)--[[User:TerryHeaton|TerryHeaton]] ([[User talk:TerryHeaton|talk]]) 23:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
394018 +++$+++ Kimchi.sg +++$+++ Kimchi.sg +++$+++ 394017 +++$+++ 394017 +++$+++ 2010-10-22 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.287750180E09 +++$+++ I notice you've asked also on [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion]] so I don't want to disrupt the conversation there. I'm not intent to restore the article myself because it seems sufficiently non-neutral to qualify as [[WP:ADS|advertising]].  +++$+++ :I notice you've asked also on [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion]] so I don't want to disrupt the conversation there. I'm not intent to restore the article myself because it seems sufficiently non-neutral to qualify as [[WP:ADS|advertising]]. [[User:Kimchi.sg|Kimchi.sg]] ([[User talk:Kimchi.sg#top|talk]]) 05:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
394019 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Kimchi.sg +++$+++ 394017 +++$+++ 394017 +++$+++ 2010-10-22 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.287807540E09 +++$+++ I was coming here on a similar errand. TH has asked at REFUND what is the avenue of appeal and been directed to DRV. It will be better if he can show a de-peacocked version there: do you have any objection if I undelete the page and userfy it for him? I have neither time nor inclination to do much in the way of rewriting it, but we might be able to find someone who would help him improve the draft before going to DRV. Regards,  +++$+++ :I was coming here on a similar errand. TH has asked at REFUND what is the avenue of appeal and been directed to DRV. It will be better if he can show a de-peacocked version there: do you have any objection if I undelete the page and userfy it for him? I have neither time nor inclination to do much in the way of rewriting it, but we might be able to find someone who would help him improve the draft before going to DRV. Regards, [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 21:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
394020 +++$+++ Kimchi.sg +++$+++ Kimchi.sg +++$+++ 394017 +++$+++ 394019 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.288038660E09 +++$+++ Userfied to [[User:TerryHeaton\/Terry Heaton]].  +++$+++ ::Userfied to [[User:TerryHeaton/Terry Heaton]]. [[User:Kimchi.sg|Kimchi.sg]] ([[User talk:Kimchi.sg#top|talk]]) 13:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
394021 +++$+++ Kimchi.sg +++$+++ Kimchi.sg +++$+++ 394017 +++$+++ 394017 +++$+++ 2010-10-22 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.287750300E09 +++$+++ The reason is given in the deletion log, i.e. [[WP:CSD#A7|non-notable company]].  +++$+++ :The reason is given in the deletion log, i.e. [[WP:CSD#A7|non-notable company]]. [[User:Kimchi.sg|Kimchi.sg]] ([[User talk:Kimchi.sg#top|talk]]) 05:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

4808 +++$+++ J Bar +++$+++ J Bar +++$+++ 4808 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-14 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.292333100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:J Bar|J Bar]] ([[User talk:J Bar#top|talk]]) 05:25, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
4809 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ J Bar +++$+++ 4808 +++$+++ 4808 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.295355540E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  04:59, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

612471 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-04 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.165262880E09 +++$+++ Oh, yes. The article starts to tail off away from Darwin a bit in the end, with the Eugenics and Social Darwinism sections. Do you think it might be worthwhile adding a concluding paragraph after them, about his effect on biology or something, to return the focus to his intellectual achievements?  +++$+++ Oh, yes. The article starts to tail off away from Darwin a bit in the end, with the Eugenics and Social Darwinism sections. Do you think it might be worthwhile adding a concluding paragraph after them, about his effect on biology or something, to return the focus to his intellectual achievements? [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 12:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
612472 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612471 +++$+++ 612471 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.165272600E09 +++$+++ Still trying to keep things concise, but will try checking and clarifying who knew or agreed with what, as your first paragraph. I'd little to do with the ''Legacy'' section and would like to see it shortened, but it's a good idea to add a last section: perhaps make it ''Legacy to science'' or ''Impact on science'', and if possible find another title for the present ''Legacy'' section, as it mostly involves other ideas drawing on the prestige of Darwin's name for things he often didn't agree with. ..  +++$+++ :Still trying to keep things concise, but will try checking and clarifying who knew or agreed with what, as your first paragraph. I'd little to do with the ''Legacy'' section and would like to see it shortened, but it's a good idea to add a last section: perhaps make it ''Legacy to science'' or ''Impact on science'', and if possible find another title for the present ''Legacy'' section, as it mostly involves other ideas drawing on the prestige of Darwin's name for things he often didn't agree with. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 14:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

266956 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266956 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-20 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.184973360E09 +++$+++ It's very strange that you had so much trouble with people considering all the good work you've done on all the various articles. Indeed, it's a shame it didn't work out for the Castro article. I hope the Guevara will not end in the same chaos. I'm glad the accusations of people being horribly biased have ceased though. <strong> +++$+++ It's very strange that you had so much trouble with people considering all the good work you've done on all the various articles. Indeed, it's a shame it didn't work out for the Castro article. I hope the Guevara will not end in the same chaos. I'm glad the accusations of people being horribly biased have ceased though. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 16:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
266957 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266956 +++$+++ 266956 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.185055140E09 +++$+++ Now that I know that these sockpuppet rings are common on Wikipedia and some are even  comprised of admins, I am extremely careful what I edit. I mostly don't stick with any one article.I have learned  that the Arbitrators are no better and openly show their biases. As I cannot withstand such months of persecution again, I mostly write my own articles to avoid this problem. I have come to believe that \"good work\" is not the aim of Wikipedia but rather the pure exercise of power and  control of articles and subject matter by those editor sockpuppets and editor tag teams with investments in article outcome. I just play around now for my own joy and try to stay away from articles of serious content and from other editors, excepting you, of course! I don't take Wikipedia seriously anymore but rather accept that it is corrupt. (I was naive before.) I think Jimbo's behavior says it all and I am deeply disturbed by the way [[User:Zleitzen| <font color=\"Firebrick\">Z<\/font><font color=\"darkgreen\">leitzen<\/font>]]<sup><small><font color=\"Orange\">[[User_talk:Zleitzen|(talk)]]<\/font><\/small><\/sup> is being treated after all the excellent work he has contributed to Wikipedia. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Now that I know that these sockpuppet rings are common on Wikipedia and some are even  comprised of admins, I am extremely careful what I edit. I mostly don't stick with any one article.I have learned  that the Arbitrators are no better and openly show their biases. As I cannot withstand such months of persecution again, I mostly write my own articles to avoid this problem. I have come to believe that "good work" is not the aim of Wikipedia but rather the pure exercise of power and  control of articles and subject matter by those editor sockpuppets and editor tag teams with investments in article outcome. I just play around now for my own joy and try to stay away from articles of serious content and from other editors, excepting you, of course! I don't take Wikipedia seriously anymore but rather accept that it is corrupt. (I was naive before.) I think Jimbo's behavior says it all and I am deeply disturbed by the way [[User:Zleitzen| <font color="Firebrick">Z</font><font color="darkgreen">leitzen</font>]]<sup><small><font color="Orange">[[User_talk:Zleitzen|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> is being treated after all the excellent work he has contributed to Wikipedia. Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 14:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
266958 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266956 +++$+++ 266957 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.185055140E09 +++$+++ p.s. I think [[Che Guevara]] is ruined now and I am so sad for [[User:Zleitzen| <font color=\"Firebrick\">Z<\/font><font color=\"darkgreen\">leitzen<\/font>]]<sup><small><font color=\"Orange\">[[User_talk:Zleitzen|(talk)]]<\/font><\/small><\/sup>. But anyone who tries to stand up on principle here is headed for despair.  Sincerely,   +++$+++ ::p.s. I think [[Che Guevara]] is ruined now and I am so sad for [[User:Zleitzen| <font color="Firebrick">Z</font><font color="darkgreen">leitzen</font>]]<sup><small><font color="Orange">[[User_talk:Zleitzen|(talk)]]</font></small></sup>. But anyone who tries to stand up on principle here is headed for despair.  Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 14:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

4814 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4814 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-11 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.207970160E09 +++$+++ P.S.  I notice NDGP, who changed \"Acadiana\" to \"Cajun Country,\" has been a Wikipedian for less than a year, and, if I read his page correctly, he has spent little more than a week in Louisiana.  I find it rather presumptious of him to swoop in and make such a drastic change -- a change the site warns against when one is about to rename a page.  I resent the fact the we must now \"discuss\" something that, to me, is self-evident (that \"Acadiana\" should be the true title of the page) and something that should not have been tinkered with in the first place.  -- +++$+++ P.S.  I notice NDGP, who changed "Acadiana" to "Cajun Country," has been a Wikipedian for less than a year, and, if I read his page correctly, he has spent little more than a week in Louisiana.  I find it rather presumptious of him to swoop in and make such a drastic change -- a change the site warns against when one is about to rename a page.  I resent the fact the we must now "discuss" something that, to me, is self-evident (that "Acadiana" should be the true title of the page) and something that should not have been tinkered with in the first place.  --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] ([[User talk:Skb8721|talk]]) 20:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
4815 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.208136960E09 +++$+++ Yes, I've seen that error elsewhere; I think they mean the \"Cajun Heartland\" region, which is different than \"Acadiana.\"  -- +++$+++ **Yes, I've seen that error elsewhere; I think they mean the "Cajun Heartland" region, which is different than "Acadiana."  --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] ([[User talk:Skb8721|talk]]) 18:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
4816 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.208137140E09 +++$+++ P.S.  So what's next?  I tried to fix the matter on my own, but I'm unable to do so.  -- +++$+++ ***P.S.  So what's next?  I tried to fix the matter on my own, but I'm unable to do so.  --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] ([[User talk:Skb8721|talk]]) 18:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

266959 +++$+++ The Random Editor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-20 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.184998500E09 +++$+++ Hello there Mattisse. I'm The Random Editor. I can see we are both interested in helping to build the above article. I noticed when running over the sources. They all refer to the barrier being 4000km and the article mentions it being 3200km something. I was just wondering if you know which one is correct. I suspect the article is probably wrong but I wanted to check with you first. Thanks, --'''<font face=\"Perpetua\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ Hello there Mattisse. I'm The Random Editor. I can see we are both interested in helping to build the above article. I noticed when running over the sources. They all refer to the barrier being 4000km and the article mentions it being 3200km something. I was just wondering if you know which one is correct. I suspect the article is probably wrong but I wanted to check with you first. Thanks, --'''<font face="Perpetua" size="3">[[User:The Random Editor|<font color="Blue">Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor</font>]] ([[User talk:The Random Editor|<font color="Black">ταlκ</font>]])</font>''' 23:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
266960 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266959 +++$+++ 266959 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.185056220E09 +++$+++ I agree with your evaluation of the numbers. We should use the figures referenced in the sources.  We need more information. I am interested in helping to build [[Indo-Bangladeshi barrier]] but I am afraid I know little about the subject and will have to learn! My original involvement was purely a rescue job but now I find the content extremely interesting.  Sincerely,   +++$+++ :I agree with your evaluation of the numbers. We should use the figures referenced in the sources.  We need more information. I am interested in helping to build [[Indo-Bangladeshi barrier]] but I am afraid I know little about the subject and will have to learn! My original involvement was purely a rescue job but now I find the content extremely interesting.  Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 15:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

529104 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-09 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.199926920E09 +++$+++ Just finished transferring a bunch to Wikimedia commons - there were a lot there of subjects for which we previously had no images. Many thanks for the heads up. Cheers.  +++$+++ Just finished transferring a bunch to Wikimedia commons - there were a lot there of subjects for which we previously had no images. Many thanks for the heads up. Cheers. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] ([[User talk:4u1e|talk]]) 17:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
529105 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529104 +++$+++ 529104 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.199927460E09 +++$+++ I'm glad to see that it worked out so well. He sure is a nice person to work with! I told him that I would leave a testimonial on flickr about his drag racing pictures in the set of pictures. Would you do the same for him about his F1 pics? Let me know if you need a better explanation.  +++$+++ :I'm glad to see that it worked out so well. He sure is a nice person to work with! I told him that I would leave a testimonial on flickr about his drag racing pictures in the set of pictures. Would you do the same for him about his F1 pics? Let me know if you need a better explanation. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 17:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
529106 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529104 +++$+++ 529105 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.200355440E09 +++$+++ Yeah, no problem.  +++$+++ ::Yeah, no problem. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] ([[User talk:4u1e|talk]]) 16:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
529107 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529104 +++$+++ 529106 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.200359820E09 +++$+++ Now that ''is'' extremely cool! I'm pretty excited that we got to ''use'' his photos in 20 or so articles. Win win I guess. Cheers.  +++$+++ :::Now that ''is'' extremely cool! I'm pretty excited that we got to ''use'' his photos in 20 or so articles. Win win I guess. Cheers. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] ([[User talk:4u1e|talk]]) 17:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

266962 +++$+++ EncMstr +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-23 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.185233160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the fixups.  Nice work!  \u2014 +++$+++ Thanks for the fixups.  Nice work!  —[[user:EncMstr|EncMstr]] 16:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
266963 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266962 +++$+++ 266962 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.185239400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for noticing! I appreciate your taking the time to do so.  -- +++$+++ :Thanks for noticing! I appreciate your taking the time to do so.  --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 18:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

4819 +++$+++ Issuecheck +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-19 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.211186700E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Southwest Louisiana|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Southwest Louisiana]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Southwest Louisiana|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Southwest Louisiana]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Issuecheck|Issuecheck]] ([[User talk:Issuecheck|talk]]) 01:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
4820 +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4819 +++$+++ 4819 +++$+++ 2008-05-19 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.211191380E09 +++$+++ POV question now added to the article. Thanks.  +++$+++ : POV question now added to the article. Thanks. [[User:Aaron charles|Aaron charles]] ([[User talk:Aaron charles#top|talk]]) 03:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

576277 +++$+++ Jtrainor +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576277 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-23 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.201134720E09 +++$+++ The largest problem with the article (well, other than the fact that it's inherently POV) is biased sources.  +++$+++ The largest problem with the article (well, other than the fact that it's inherently POV) is biased sources. [[User:Jtrainor|Jtrainor]] ([[User talk:Jtrainor|talk]]) 16:32, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
576278 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576277 +++$+++ 576277 +++$+++ 2008-01-23 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.201140960E09 +++$+++ I do what I can to help where I can, but I don't think I can be much help on that article. I did try long ago to get it more NPOV but was not successful. I think if you start from the title...which has the word \"Allegations\" and recognize that mostly, that is all you're dealing with, that keeping the allegations and then tryiing to put them into contect without going off on long tangents about who made the allegations and what their rationale was for doing so, you might have better luck. The effort to get it NPOV would be centered on trying to find resources that put the evidence in context, or evidence where particular bodies (like the UN, etc.) have stated that the U.S. is not a sponsor of terrorism...that is a bit of a strawman argument to do so, since it's not the kind of thing neutral representative bodies traditionally do.-- +++$+++ :I do what I can to help where I can, but I don't think I can be much help on that article. I did try long ago to get it more NPOV but was not successful. I think if you start from the title...which has the word "Allegations" and recognize that mostly, that is all you're dealing with, that keeping the allegations and then tryiing to put them into contect without going off on long tangents about who made the allegations and what their rationale was for doing so, you might have better luck. The effort to get it NPOV would be centered on trying to find resources that put the evidence in context, or evidence where particular bodies (like the UN, etc.) have stated that the U.S. is not a sponsor of terrorism...that is a bit of a strawman argument to do so, since it's not the kind of thing neutral representative bodies traditionally do.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 18:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
576279 +++$+++ 75.175.22.16 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576277 +++$+++ 576277 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.201165140E09 +++$+++ Another good start would be just trying to clean up the execrable writing in the article. :( [[Special:Contributions\/75.175.22.16|75.175.22.16]] ( +++$+++ :Another good start would be just trying to clean up the execrable writing in the article. :( [[Special:Contributions/75.175.22.16|75.175.22.16]] ([[User talk:75.175.22.16|talk]]) 00:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

4821 +++$+++ Jh12 +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4821 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-22 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.216785180E09 +++$+++ You removed the [[Louisiana State University Agricultural Center]] from [[Template:Public universities and colleges in Louisiana]] and rightfully so. However, we just found this uncategorized, unlinked article and it is very difficult to even know it exists.  Can you place it in a proper LSU template or create one for the LSU System? -- +++$+++ You removed the [[Louisiana State University Agricultural Center]] from [[Template:Public universities and colleges in Louisiana]] and rightfully so. However, we just found this uncategorized, unlinked article and it is very difficult to even know it exists.  Can you place it in a proper LSU template or create one for the LSU System? --[[User:Jh12|Jh12]] ([[User talk:Jh12|talk]]) 20:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
4822 +++$+++ Jh12 +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4821 +++$+++ 4821 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.217193060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for checking, although I guess there really isn't a lot to link to it in the first place. Best, -- +++$+++ :Thanks for checking, although I guess there really isn't a lot to link to it in the first place. Best, --[[User:Jh12|Jh12]] ([[User talk:Jh12|talk]]) 14:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

529110 +++$+++ Alexlaw65 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529110 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-12 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.200136980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Alexlaw65|Alexlaw65]] ([[User talk:Alexlaw65|talk]]) 03:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
529111 +++$+++ Deb +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529110 +++$+++ 529110 +++$+++ 2008-01-13 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.200250980E09 +++$+++ Sorry, you must think I'm very rude for not replying.  Someone else had added another message underneath, which of course disguised yours, and I only just noticed it.  +++$+++ :Sorry, you must think I'm very rude for not replying.  Someone else had added another message underneath, which of course disguised yours, and I only just noticed it. [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb|talk]]) 11:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
529112 +++$+++ Deb +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529110 +++$+++ 529110 +++$+++ 2008-01-13 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.200261120E09 +++$+++ It shouldn't be up to ''me''.  I thought it was a clear-cut case of \"notability not proven\" the way it stood, but if he can improve it, it's no problem as far as I'm concerned.  I thought you had dealt with it particularly well, and thanks for that.  +++$+++ :It shouldn't be up to ''me''.  I thought it was a clear-cut case of "notability not proven" the way it stood, but if he can improve it, it's no problem as far as I'm concerned.  I thought you had dealt with it particularly well, and thanks for that. [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb|talk]]) 13:52, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
529113 +++$+++ Deb +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529110 +++$+++ 529112 +++$+++ 2008-01-13 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.200264360E09 +++$+++ Hmm, that would certainly be true if I was going to ''restore'' it.  I suppose it's a reasonable way of going about it even if he's recreating.  To be honest, I haven't thought about it much before, because usually the things I delete are straightforward speedies and they rarely get re-created in any useful form.  +++$+++ ::Hmm, that would certainly be true if I was going to ''restore'' it.  I suppose it's a reasonable way of going about it even if he's recreating.  To be honest, I haven't thought about it much before, because usually the things I delete are straightforward speedies and they rarely get re-created in any useful form. [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb|talk]]) 14:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

266967 +++$+++ IPSOS +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266967 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-30 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.185842280E09 +++$+++ Google does show that the reference without stupa is by far the most common. See [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=%22Boudhanath+stupa%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a] (17,800) vs. [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=Boudhanath&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a] (52,900). Even subtracting them still leaves 35,100 vs. 17,800.  +++$+++ Google does show that the reference without stupa is by far the most common. See [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Boudhanath+stupa%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a] (17,800) vs. [http://www.google.com/search?q=Boudhanath&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a] (52,900). Even subtracting them still leaves 35,100 vs. 17,800. [[User:IPSOS|IPSOS]] ([[User talk:IPSOS|talk]]) 17:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
266968 +++$+++ IPSOS +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266967 +++$+++ 266967 +++$+++ 2007-07-30 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.185842340E09 +++$+++ Well, you are probably right in the general case for stupas, but there are several well-known exceptions which are simply referred to by the site name.  +++$+++ :Well, you are probably right in the general case for stupas, but there are several well-known exceptions which are simply referred to by the site name. [[User:IPSOS|IPSOS]] ([[User talk:IPSOS|talk]]) 17:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

4825 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-23 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.222211580E09 +++$+++ I see that a user named Nintala has gone through and rendered many Louisiana place names in French.  For example, Avery Island is now parenthetically referred to as \xcele d'Avery.  There is no harm in this, except it seems to me that someone is using Wikipedia to advance their own linguistic activism.  I mean, why not render Louisiana place names in Spanish, too?  Where does one stop?  Furthermore, I don't know any local French speakers who call Avery Island \"\xcele d'Avery\" -- rather, they call it in French \"La Saline\" or they just interject the usual English expression into their French.  What to do?  -- +++$+++ I see that a user named Nintala has gone through and rendered many Louisiana place names in French.  For example, Avery Island is now parenthetically referred to as Île d'Avery.  There is no harm in this, except it seems to me that someone is using Wikipedia to advance their own linguistic activism.  I mean, why not render Louisiana place names in Spanish, too?  Where does one stop?  Furthermore, I don't know any local French speakers who call Avery Island "Île d'Avery" -- rather, they call it in French "La Saline" or they just interject the usual English expression into their French.  What to do?  --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] ([[User talk:Skb8721|talk]]) 16:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
4826 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4825 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.222305180E09 +++$+++ This reminds me of a trilingual street sign in New Iberia, where downtown street names are rendered in English, French, and Spanish.  The sign for \"French Street\" is translated as \"Rue Francaise\" and \"Calle Francesa\" -- but French Street in New Iberia was named for the French family, so the correct translation should have been \"Rue French\" and \"Calle French\".  The intention was good, but the results were misleading.  -- +++$+++ ::This reminds me of a trilingual street sign in New Iberia, where downtown street names are rendered in English, French, and Spanish.  The sign for "French Street" is translated as "Rue Francaise" and "Calle Francesa" -- but French Street in New Iberia was named for the French family, so the correct translation should have been "Rue French" and "Calle French".  The intention was good, but the results were misleading.  --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] ([[User talk:Skb8721|talk]]) 18:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
4827 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4825 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.222305960E09 +++$+++ Aaron Charles, I see you added a note to Nintala's page; I have now done likewise, noting that literal translation of placenames can merely lead to trouble, and using Avery Island as an example of how the matter is more complicated than it may seem.  But, now, do we undo what Nintala has done?  -- +++$+++ :::Aaron Charles, I see you added a note to Nintala's page; I have now done likewise, noting that literal translation of placenames can merely lead to trouble, and using Avery Island as an example of how the matter is more complicated than it may seem.  But, now, do we undo what Nintala has done?  --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] ([[User talk:Skb8721|talk]]) 18:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

529114 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529114 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-13 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.200234360E09 +++$+++ I didn't create or expand [[guest appearance]]. All I did was rewrite the hook so it didn't read as if Clapton's guitar was playing the solo all by itself (I know people thought he was God at the time, but he wasn't ... :-)).  +++$+++ I didn't create or expand [[guest appearance]]. All I did was rewrite the hook so it didn't read as if Clapton's guitar was playing the solo all by itself (I know people thought he was God at the time, but he wasn't ... :-)). [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 06:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
529115 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529114 +++$+++ 529114 +++$+++ 2008-01-13 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.200234660E09 +++$+++ Give credit to [[User:Mikkalai]] ... he seems to have done all the hard work, and didn't get it. Then you can just revert your edit to my page.  +++$+++ :Give credit to [[User:Mikkalai]] ... he seems to have done all the hard work, and didn't get it. Then you can just revert your edit to my page. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 06:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
529116 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529114 +++$+++ 529115 +++$+++ 2008-01-13 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.200234840E09 +++$+++ {{done}} Sorry for the mixup. [[User:Mikkalai]] has been credited properly.  +++$+++ ::{{done}} Sorry for the mixup. [[User:Mikkalai]] has been credited properly. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 06:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

266971 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-07 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.186500720E09 +++$+++ It looks like the reappearance of 999 was a result of a accidental cut and paste, so no need to worry. -- +++$+++ It looks like the reappearance of 999 was a result of a accidental cut and paste, so no need to worry. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 08:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
266972 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266971 +++$+++ 266971 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.186514580E09 +++$+++ Well, perhaps you could talk me into the copy edit. Right now the article does not seem innately interesting. It seems poorly organised and poorly written. Also, there are so many copy editing problems that I am surprised it has not gotten harsher treatment from FAR. There seems to be an \"owner\" of the article so I would hesitate to wade into possible hostility by making many changes. (Remember, Pigman almost had a nervous breakdown.) Could you explain more clearly what it is you are asking me to do?  Sincerely,   +++$+++ :Well, perhaps you could talk me into the copy edit. Right now the article does not seem innately interesting. It seems poorly organised and poorly written. Also, there are so many copy editing problems that I am surprised it has not gotten harsher treatment from FAR. There seems to be an "owner" of the article so I would hesitate to wade into possible hostility by making many changes. (Remember, Pigman almost had a nervous breakdown.) Could you explain more clearly what it is you are asking me to do?  Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 12:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
266973 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266971 +++$+++ 266972 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.186704960E09 +++$+++ I am in fact much obliged to you, and hope you will continue; I may, like Pharos, disagree in detail. In fact, citing Liberalis by chapter is the standard method; but it does no harm to clarify the reference, as I have now done.  +++$+++ ::I am in fact much obliged to you, and hope you will continue; I may, like Pharos, disagree in detail. In fact, citing Liberalis by chapter is the standard method; but it does no harm to clarify the reference, as I have now done. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 17:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
266974 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266971 +++$+++ 266972 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.186724460E09 +++$+++ I don't see how to avoid the list. To attempt to synthesize the moderns would be OR, in the absence of a survey article ''on this subject''. Even if there were one, experience suggests that it would be special pleading, and that would be worse.  +++$+++ ::I don't see how to avoid the list. To attempt to synthesize the moderns would be OR, in the absence of a survey article ''on this subject''. Even if there were one, experience suggests that it would be special pleading, and that would be worse. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 22:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
266975 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266971 +++$+++ 266974 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.186724820E09 +++$+++ Well, I thank you for what you have done; and if you see more, feel free.  +++$+++ :::Well, I thank you for what you have done; and if you see more, feel free. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 22:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

4828 +++$+++ Nintala +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-29 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.222672620E09 +++$+++ I see that I have caused much more trouble than I had intended.  I am in full support for CODOFIL and any aims to increase the visual presence, auditory presence, and de facto and de jure presence of the French language as it pertains to Louisiana and the descendants of the French and French Creoles in Louisiana.  I'm not offended by the changes back as I realise that it was in bad judgement and not based on practice as in Louisiana.  Vivre la langue fran\xe7aise dans la Louisiane! +++$+++ I see that I have caused much more trouble than I had intended.  I am in full support for CODOFIL and any aims to increase the visual presence, auditory presence, and de facto and de jure presence of the French language as it pertains to Louisiana and the descendants of the French and French Creoles in Louisiana.  I'm not offended by the changes back as I realise that it was in bad judgement and not based on practice as in Louisiana.  Vivre la langue française dans la Louisiane![[User:Nintala|Nintala]] ([[User talk:Nintala|talk]]) 00:17, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
4829 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4828 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-30 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.222817640E09 +++$+++ Good, thanks!  -- +++$+++ ::::Good, thanks!  --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] ([[User talk:Skb8721|talk]]) 16:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

525093 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525093 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-17 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.155846480E09 +++$+++ Arcadian, I've taken the liberty of italicizing ''[[Pygeum africanum]]'' and ''[[Serenoa repens]]'' on the template. Hope you don't mind. Thanks,  +++$+++ Arcadian, I've taken the liberty of italicizing ''[[Pygeum africanum]]'' and ''[[Serenoa repens]]'' on the template. Hope you don't mind. Thanks, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 13:28, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
525094 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525093 +++$+++ 525093 +++$+++ 2006-08-17 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.155861180E09 +++$+++ Looks good - thanks. -- +++$+++ :Looks good - thanks. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 17:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

266976 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-10 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.186744620E09 +++$+++ I said I didn't understand one set of paragraph breaks. I also corrected one astronomical error, which probably demonstrates that the text you copyedited was ambiguous. Why do you suppose I want your copyedit thrown out the window?  +++$+++ I said I didn't understand one set of paragraph breaks. I also corrected one astronomical error, which probably demonstrates that the text you copyedited was ambiguous. Why do you suppose I want your copyedit thrown out the window? [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 04:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
266977 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266976 +++$+++ 266976 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.186770600E09 +++$+++ Because you have been singularly critical and unappreciative of the massive amount of work I put into your article. The only feedback I have received from you and your other editor who apparently [[WP:OWN]] the article has been unpleasant and snide. You have given me no indication that you approved of anything I did. I have every reason to believe you do not value my contributions and want the article reverted. Regards,   +++$+++ :Because you have been singularly critical and unappreciative of the massive amount of work I put into your article. The only feedback I have received from you and your other editor who apparently [[WP:OWN]] the article has been unpleasant and snide. You have given me no indication that you approved of anything I did. I have every reason to believe you do not value my contributions and want the article reverted. Regards,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 11:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
266978 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266976 +++$+++ 266977 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.186800600E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the copyedit; I am grateful for it. I have said so repeatedly, including immediately above. Does this mean that Pharos and I cannot emend the 5% where the copy-edit has slipped into  error of fact, and question another 5% where we do not immediately comprehend your choices? Whatever I have said about it that appears brusque or personal, it was not so intended; and I regret whatever it was. Now, can we have a nice cup of tea, and start over?  +++$+++ ::I appreciate the copyedit; I am grateful for it. I have said so repeatedly, including immediately above. Does this mean that Pharos and I cannot emend the 5% where the copy-edit has slipped into  error of fact, and question another 5% where we do not immediately comprehend your choices? Whatever I have said about it that appears brusque or personal, it was not so intended; and I regret whatever it was. Now, can we have a nice cup of tea, and start over? [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 19:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
266979 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266976 +++$+++ 266978 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.186801200E09 +++$+++ I would like to start over and am unhappy over what this situation has become. And I fully expected you to emend my copy edit as I clearly knew nothing about the subject matter so of course I would make outlandish mistakes. I'm just not used to the rather blaming sounding edit summaries. Maybe I have been overprotected so far. Add something to the poor [[Scholartis Press]] I started solely for your article as a peace offering! Sincerely,   +++$+++ :::I would like to start over and am unhappy over what this situation has become. And I fully expected you to emend my copy edit as I clearly knew nothing about the subject matter so of course I would make outlandish mistakes. I'm just not used to the rather blaming sounding edit summaries. Maybe I have been overprotected so far. Add something to the poor [[Scholartis Press]] I started solely for your article as a peace offering! Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 20:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

4833 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-13 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.234538940E09 +++$+++ {{User Good Article|Inauguration of Barack Obama}} Thank you for the editorial assistance that you gave to help improve this article. You may want to post the attached contribution notice on your user page. Keep up the good work as we try to take this article to [[WP:FA]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ {{User Good Article|Inauguration of Barack Obama}} Thank you for the editorial assistance that you gave to help improve this article. You may want to post the attached contribution notice on your user page. Keep up the good work as we try to take this article to [[WP:FA]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 07:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
4834 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 2009-02-21 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.235227440E09 +++$+++ I am intending nominate this at [[WP:FAC]] in the very near future.  How do you feel about this article as a FA?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :I am intending nominate this at [[WP:FAC]] in the very near future.  How do you feel about this article as a FA?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 06:44, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
4835 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4834 +++$+++ 2009-02-23 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.235392140E09 +++$+++ I had intended to nominate it as my next nominee when my current nominee's judgment has been completed.  Do you feel there are problems with the article right now?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::I had intended to nominate it as my next nominee when my current nominee's judgment has been completed.  Do you feel there are problems with the article right now?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 04:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
4836 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4834 +++$+++ 2009-02-23 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.235431500E09 +++$+++ Will you be interested in a co-nom at FAC?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::Will you be interested in a co-nom at FAC?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 15:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
4837 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4836 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.235979000E09 +++$+++ Please come visit [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Inauguration of Barack Obama]] and help me address concerns as they arise.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::Please come visit [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Inauguration of Barack Obama]] and help me address concerns as they arise.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 23:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
4838 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4837 +++$+++ 2009-03-02 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.236053760E09 +++$+++ O.K. you can remove the image.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::O.K. you can remove the image.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 20:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
4839 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4838 +++$+++ 2009-03-02 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.236057660E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Still looking for a map of the parade route.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::::Thanks. Still looking for a map of the parade route.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 21:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
4840 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4839 +++$+++ 2009-03-04 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.236168420E09 +++$+++ Are you guys giving up on this one?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::::Are you guys giving up on this one?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 04:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
4841 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4840 +++$+++ 2009-03-05 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.236244860E09 +++$+++ I notice you are editing, but you are not making any notes on the FAC discussion to show what you have done.  Please do so, so that we can monitor progress.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::::::I notice you are editing, but you are not making any notes on the FAC discussion to show what you have done.  Please do so, so that we can monitor progress.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 01:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
4842 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.236500700E09 +++$+++ I have started [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Inauguration of Barack Obama\/archive1\u200e]]. I will be continuing to work on the article.  Hopefully, over the course of the month while this is at PR we can get it cleaned up enough for FAC.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :I have started [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Inauguration of Barack Obama/archive1‎]]. I will be continuing to work on the article.  Hopefully, over the course of the month while this is at PR we can get it cleaned up enough for FAC.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 00:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
4843 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4842 +++$+++ 2009-03-20 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.237558020E09 +++$+++ The PR finally got some feedback.  Come take a look if you get a chance.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::The PR finally got some feedback.  Come take a look if you get a chance.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 07:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
4844 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4843 +++$+++ 2009-04-11 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.239515700E09 +++$+++ I have renominated at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Inauguration of Barack Obama\/archive2\u200e]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::I have renominated at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Inauguration of Barack Obama/archive2‎]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 22:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
4845 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4844 +++$+++ 2009-12-22 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.261472580E09 +++$+++ My next nomination will be [[Jay Pritzker Pavilion]].  After that, we can give FAC a shot.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::My next nomination will be [[Jay Pritzker Pavilion]].  After that, we can give FAC a shot.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 01:03, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
4846 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4833 +++$+++ 4845 +++$+++ 2010-01-27 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.264662780E09 +++$+++ You can comment at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Inauguration of Barack Obama\/archive4]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::::You can comment at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Inauguration of Barack Obama/archive4]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 23:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

529122 +++$+++ Alansohn +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-14 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.200358860E09 +++$+++ Most of the fee-based links to the NYTimes are for articles from 1981 and beyond, which the Times has committed to make available for free. Some of the post-1981 haven't been converted, and I'll often include the link in anticipation of the changeover, even if the article requires a fee at the point in time that it was added. As a subscriber, I can look at a .pdf copy of the article, and I will never add a reference (with or without a link) without having read the actual article. For older articles, I am sometimes stuck in the habit of including a link to the preview, which often includes enough of the article to support the claim and to make the link useful even to non-subscribers. The source included here for Doris Day's rejection of the film role was a poor choice for inclusion with the link, as the mention was not in the preview, but deep in the article. As both you and I have indicated, there is no need to include a link, I just try do so wherever the article is available. Thanks again for your suggestion.  +++$+++ Most of the fee-based links to the NYTimes are for articles from 1981 and beyond, which the Times has committed to make available for free. Some of the post-1981 haven't been converted, and I'll often include the link in anticipation of the changeover, even if the article requires a fee at the point in time that it was added. As a subscriber, I can look at a .pdf copy of the article, and I will never add a reference (with or without a link) without having read the actual article. For older articles, I am sometimes stuck in the habit of including a link to the preview, which often includes enough of the article to support the claim and to make the link useful even to non-subscribers. The source included here for Doris Day's rejection of the film role was a poor choice for inclusion with the link, as the mention was not in the preview, but deep in the article. As both you and I have indicated, there is no need to include a link, I just try do so wherever the article is available. Thanks again for your suggestion. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 17:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
529123 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529122 +++$+++ 529122 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.200359160E09 +++$+++ Well put. Thanks for responding.  +++$+++ :Well put. Thanks for responding. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 17:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

266981 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266981 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-10 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.186788000E09 +++$+++ site. I think that everything will work out in time. I think that Gatadoc may be feeling the stress as well. I think things will work out as long as everyone involved remains calm and committed. I am a bit of a newbie and a 2 finger typer. I would offer to help out but my knowledge  of Che is comparatively marginal. Anyway that is what happened and I hope my explanation helps.  +++$+++ site. I think that everything will work out in time. I think that Gatadoc may be feeling the stress as well. I think things will work out as long as everyone involved remains calm and committed. I am a bit of a newbie and a 2 finger typer. I would offer to help out but my knowledge  of Che is comparatively marginal. Anyway that is what happened and I hope my explanation helps. [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 16:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
266982 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266981 +++$+++ 266981 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.186788600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your answer. I appreciate it. It is true that I am totally stressed out. (By the way, my knowledge of Che is comparatively marginal also, so don't let that stop you. I'm just pretty good at finding sources!) Thanks,   +++$+++ :Thanks for your answer. I appreciate it. It is true that I am totally stressed out. (By the way, my knowledge of Che is comparatively marginal also, so don't let that stop you. I'm just pretty good at finding sources!) Thanks,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 16:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

529126 +++$+++ Mrs.EasterBunny +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-16 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.200549360E09 +++$+++ Can you update the main page? (asked of 3 people, who will be first?)  +++$+++ Can you update the main page? (asked of 3 people, who will be first?) [[User:Mrs.EasterBunny|Mrs.EasterBunny]] ([[User talk:Mrs.EasterBunny|talk]]) 21:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
529127 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529126 +++$+++ 529126 +++$+++ 2008-01-17 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.200591060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for including [[St Barnabas' Church, Bromborough]] in DYK today.  I didn't know it had been nominated.  Do you know who make the hook and nominated it?  +++$+++ :Thanks for including [[St Barnabas' Church, Bromborough]] in DYK today.  I didn't know it had been nominated.  Do you know who make the hook and nominated it? [[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy|talk]]) 09:31, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

529128 +++$+++ Islescape +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529128 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-17 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.200598200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your appreciation on [[Lyari River]], but I cannot recall any wrongmarking, unless any specific edit is indicated. I only tagged article(s) after seeing the DYK's on Mainpage on [[16 January]]. In fact there are still some anomalies at [[Wikipedia:Recent additions|Recent Additions]] which I [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Duplication|pointed out]] yesterday, and no one seems to have noticed as yet. Cheers --<i><font color=\"green\">[[User:Islescape|Isles]]<\/font><b><font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ Thanks for your appreciation on [[Lyari River]], but I cannot recall any wrongmarking, unless any specific edit is indicated. I only tagged article(s) after seeing the DYK's on Mainpage on [[16 January]]. In fact there are still some anomalies at [[Wikipedia:Recent additions|Recent Additions]] which I [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Duplication|pointed out]] yesterday, and no one seems to have noticed as yet. Cheers --<i><font color="green">[[User:Islescape|Isles]]</font><b><font color="blue">[[User:Islescape|Cape]]</font></b><sup>[[User_talk:Islescape|Talk]]</sup></i> 11:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
529129 +++$+++ Islescape +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529128 +++$+++ 529128 +++$+++ 2008-01-17 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.200617760E09 +++$+++ No problem. I did credit three articles. All the rest were already done. Cheers --<i><font color=\"green\">[[User:Islescape|Isles]]<\/font><b><font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :No problem. I did credit three articles. All the rest were already done. Cheers --<i><font color="green">[[User:Islescape|Isles]]</font><b><font color="blue">[[User:Islescape|Cape]]</font></b><sup>[[User_talk:Islescape|Talk]]</sup></i> 16:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
529130 +++$+++ Islescape +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529128 +++$+++ 529129 +++$+++ 2008-01-18 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.200686940E09 +++$+++ No. I'm afraid I didn't. --<i><font color=\"green\">[[User:Islescape|Isles]]<\/font><b><font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ ::No. I'm afraid I didn't. --<i><font color="green">[[User:Islescape|Isles]]</font><b><font color="blue">[[User:Islescape|Cape]]</font></b><sup>[[User_talk:Islescape|Talk]]</sup></i> 12:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

266987 +++$+++ IPSOS +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-13 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.186992960E09 +++$+++ So you think that [[User:Kephera975|Kephera975]] may have included [[User:999|999]] in the [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/JMax555|sockpuppet accusation]] against [[User:JMax555|JMax555]] simply to throw us off the scent, and that that comment which turned out to be cut and pasted from something on Kephera975's talk page is actually significant? I take it you have experience with the previous case? I've been recommending that people add their observations directly to the cases rather than my talk page. So if you think this is pertinent to the Kephera975 case, could you add it to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Kephera975]], please? I can't really be adding stuff secondhand.  +++$+++ So you think that [[User:Kephera975|Kephera975]] may have included [[User:999|999]] in the [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/JMax555|sockpuppet accusation]] against [[User:JMax555|JMax555]] simply to throw us off the scent, and that that comment which turned out to be cut and pasted from something on Kephera975's talk page is actually significant? I take it you have experience with the previous case? I've been recommending that people add their observations directly to the cases rather than my talk page. So if you think this is pertinent to the Kephera975 case, could you add it to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kephera975]], please? I can't really be adding stuff secondhand. [[User:IPSOS|IPSOS]] ([[User talk:IPSOS|talk]]) 01:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
266988 +++$+++ IPSOS +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266987 +++$+++ 266987 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.187041440E09 +++$+++ Well, I don't care much about all those old socks. Since they were all blocked months ago, there is no chance that there would be any data on them. However, I found the info about matching hiatuses very interesting and added it to the report. I went a bit further because while looking at it I discovered that they both made exactly 14 edits in May 2007. And guess what, more than a third of those edits for each was to the dab at the top of [[Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn]]. How likely is that?  +++$+++ :Well, I don't care much about all those old socks. Since they were all blocked months ago, there is no chance that there would be any data on them. However, I found the info about matching hiatuses very interesting and added it to the report. I went a bit further because while looking at it I discovered that they both made exactly 14 edits in May 2007. And guess what, more than a third of those edits for each was to the dab at the top of [[Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn]]. How likely is that? [[User:IPSOS|IPSOS]] ([[User talk:IPSOS|talk]]) 14:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
266989 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266987 +++$+++ 266987 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.187042460E09 +++$+++ Hi, where is your web page? I don't have the address. It is very good to hear from you! Sincerely,   +++$+++ :Hi, where is your web page? I don't have the address. It is very good to hear from you! Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 15:01, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
266990 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266987 +++$+++ 266987 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.187145960E09 +++$+++ Thanks! It looks good. I have it bookmarked now.  Sincerely,   +++$+++ :Thanks! It looks good. I have it bookmarked now.  Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 19:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

266991 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-13 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.187048040E09 +++$+++ I see you've tagged this article, which I've been working on intermittently.  I fully accept the points that there is a need for restructuring the article, and for references throughout - but, before I launch into doing that (which I may not be able to start for a couple of weeks), is there any other advice you'd like to offer ?  As it's a particular area of interest of mine, I'd be more than happy to work collaboratively on this to get it to a higher standard.  +++$+++ I see you've tagged this article, which I've been working on intermittently.  I fully accept the points that there is a need for restructuring the article, and for references throughout - but, before I launch into doing that (which I may not be able to start for a couple of weeks), is there any other advice you'd like to offer ?  As it's a particular area of interest of mine, I'd be more than happy to work collaboratively on this to get it to a higher standard. [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] 16:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
266992 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266991 +++$+++ 266991 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.187048880E09 +++$+++ It is an interest of mine also. I have lots of books that may provide good references. Thinking about the structure of the article, you have it arranged chronologically and that is probably the way to go (since there is no clear cut beginning). The organization looks basically good. It just needs to be in a narrative style with reference citations. Sincerely,   +++$+++ :It is an interest of mine also. I have lots of books that may provide good references. Thinking about the structure of the article, you have it arranged chronologically and that is probably the way to go (since there is no clear cut beginning). The organization looks basically good. It just needs to be in a narrative style with reference citations. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 16:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
266993 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266991 +++$+++ 266992 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.187049960E09 +++$+++ I wasn't involved with the original article structure, and I'll give it some more thought now.  I'd be slightly concerned if, in trying to get away from the list format, we lose useful information, but if the chronological aspect is maintained in some form it should be OK.  For instance, I wouldn't want to categorize the article into \"blues\" and \"swing\" sections, when much of the interest in the article is in permitting the reader to infer how they may have influenced each other through the passage of time.   +++$+++ ::I wasn't involved with the original article structure, and I'll give it some more thought now.  I'd be slightly concerned if, in trying to get away from the list format, we lose useful information, but if the chronological aspect is maintained in some form it should be OK.  For instance, I wouldn't want to categorize the article into "blues" and "swing" sections, when much of the interest in the article is in permitting the reader to infer how they may have influenced each other through the passage of time.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] 17:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
266994 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266991 +++$+++ 266993 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.187050500E09 +++$+++ I don't know too much about the types of lists Wikipedia tolerates. Perhaps it could be organized as a \"timeline\" or some thing along those lines. Maybe there is a list format that would accommodate it. All I know is that Wikipedia considers articles with too many lists as \"unencyclopedic\" unless it is an outright list. Sincerely,   +++$+++ :::I don't know too much about the types of lists Wikipedia tolerates. Perhaps it could be organized as a "timeline" or some thing along those lines. Maybe there is a list format that would accommodate it. All I know is that Wikipedia considers articles with too many lists as "unencyclopedic" unless it is an outright list. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 17:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
266995 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266991 +++$+++ 266994 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.187050680E09 +++$+++ Check this out:  [[Wikipedia:Lists]]. Maybe it will help.  +++$+++ ::::Check this out:  [[Wikipedia:Lists]]. Maybe it will help. [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 17:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
266996 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266991 +++$+++ 266995 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.187050920E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  A timeline is an excellent idea if I can track down the format.  Must log off now.  +++$+++ :::::Thanks.  A timeline is an excellent idea if I can track down the format.  Must log off now. [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] 17:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
266997 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266991 +++$+++ 266996 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.187051040E09 +++$+++ And check this: [[Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)]].   +++$+++ ::::::And check this: [[Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)]].  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 17:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
266998 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266991 +++$+++ 266991 +++$+++ 2007-08-16 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.187283900E09 +++$+++ Well...I've been busy. [[First rock and roll record|See what you think (so far...!)]]  +++$+++ :Well...I've been busy. [[First rock and roll record|See what you think (so far...!)]] [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] 10:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
266999 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 266991 +++$+++ 266998 +++$+++ 2007-08-16 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.187329440E09 +++$+++ Just be sure you follow [[Wikipedia:Lists]] and [[Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)]] and, of course, the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]]. Just so you know, there is a discussion going on over whether a quoted passage should be allowed at the start of an article. Some think it is tacky. For a list, the criteria is stricter. Also, the word \"arguably\" is to be avoided for stylistic reasons, if you should ever go for [[Wikipedia:Featured lists|Featured List]] status. Sincerely,  +++$+++ ::Just be sure you follow [[Wikipedia:Lists]] and [[Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)]] and, of course, the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]]. Just so you know, there is a discussion going on over whether a quoted passage should be allowed at the start of an article. Some think it is tacky. For a list, the criteria is stricter. Also, the word "arguably" is to be avoided for stylistic reasons, if you should ever go for [[Wikipedia:Featured lists|Featured List]] status. Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 22:44, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

4848 +++$+++ Lwalt +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4848 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-23 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.240523580E09 +++$+++ During the course of editing the article, I noticed what looks like a tic-for-tac disagreement going on regarding wikilinks for captions with you another editor. Although wikilinks in captions are framed as as a guideline and not a hard and fast rule, take a look at \"[[Wikipedia:CAPTION#Tips_for_describing_pictures|Tips for describing pictures]]\" under [[WP:Captions]] and work with out a consensus with the other person so that we don't get into [[WP:OWN]], [[WP:DISRUPT]] and [[WP:POINT]]. '''<font color=\"red\"><strong>\u2192<\/strong><\/font> +++$+++ During the course of editing the article, I noticed what looks like a tic-for-tac disagreement going on regarding wikilinks for captions with you another editor. Although wikilinks in captions are framed as as a guideline and not a hard and fast rule, take a look at "[[Wikipedia:CAPTION#Tips_for_describing_pictures|Tips for describing pictures]]" under [[WP:Captions]] and work with out a consensus with the other person so that we don't get into [[WP:OWN]], [[WP:DISRUPT]] and [[WP:POINT]]. '''<font color="red"><strong>→</strong></font>[[User:Lwalt|<font color="blue">Lwalt</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;♦&nbsp;[[User talk:Lwalt|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]</sup>''' 14:53, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
4849 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4848 +++$+++ 4848 +++$+++ 2009-04-23 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.240524660E09 +++$+++ I am going to explain myself on the talk page momentarily.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :I am going to explain myself on the talk page momentarily.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 15:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
4850 +++$+++ Lwalt +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4848 +++$+++ 4849 +++$+++ 2009-04-23 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.240524900E09 +++$+++ Thanks. '''<font color=\"red\"><strong>\u2192<\/strong><\/font> +++$+++ ::Thanks. '''<font color="red"><strong>→</strong></font>[[User:Lwalt|<font color="blue">Lwalt</font>]]<sup>&nbsp;♦&nbsp;[[User talk:Lwalt|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]</sup>''' 15:15, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

4854 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4854 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-14 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.247640540E09 +++$+++ Follow along at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Inauguration of Barack Obama\/archive3]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ Follow along at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Inauguration of Barack Obama/archive3]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 23:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
4855 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4854 +++$+++ 4854 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.247951520E09 +++$+++ Do you understand the finepoints of [[WP:ALT]] as mentioned in the current discussion because I need some help?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :Do you understand the finepoints of [[WP:ALT]] as mentioned in the current discussion because I need some help?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 14:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

541362 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541362 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-16 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.239905400E09 +++$+++ To my knowledge, we've never before placed flooded townsites on these templates: Ohio sites were never added, while Indiana ones that I mistakenly added to the template were removed later.   +++$+++ To my knowledge, we've never before placed flooded townsites on these templates: Ohio sites were never added, while Indiana ones that I mistakenly added to the template were removed later.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 11:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
541363 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541362 +++$+++ 541362 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.239905460E09 +++$+++ And by the way, since you knew that they were flooded townsites, why didn't you place a note to that effect on these articles?  Frankly, they're so short that they're not really very informative; it would be better if you would give these articles more data than just county and altitude.   +++$+++ :And by the way, since you knew that they were flooded townsites, why didn't you place a note to that effect on these articles?  Frankly, they're so short that they're not really very informative; it would be better if you would give these articles more data than just county and altitude.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 11:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
541364 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541362 +++$+++ 541363 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.239925260E09 +++$+++ What I mean is, couldn't you add something about its coords in the actual text, and check to see whether your communities have post offices?  I maintain a [[User:Nyttend\/ZIP|group of statewide lists of redlinked communities with post offices]], so it shouldn't be that hard to add the post offices at least.   +++$+++ ::What I mean is, couldn't you add something about its coords in the actual text, and check to see whether your communities have post offices?  I maintain a [[User:Nyttend/ZIP|group of statewide lists of redlinked communities with post offices]], so it shouldn't be that hard to add the post offices at least.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 16:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

267000 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.187569980E09 +++$+++ Sure, information about the [[Wujing Zongyao]] should be incorporated into the [[Song Dynasty]] article. I think a couple sentences would do it justice.--<strong> +++$+++ Sure, information about the [[Wujing Zongyao]] should be incorporated into the [[Song Dynasty]] article. I think a couple sentences would do it justice.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 17:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
267001 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267000 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.187571120E09 +++$+++ Architectural writings??? I'm not sure what you're talking about, enlighten me.--<strong> +++$+++ ::Architectural writings??? I'm not sure what you're talking about, enlighten me.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 17:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
267002 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267000 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.187575920E09 +++$+++ Oh those! Yes, I placed those pictures in the [[Architecture of the Song Dynasty]] article. And although I snapped the pictures with my camera from Needham's book, you do realize those drawings are not by Needham? They are actually 900 year old, drawn during the Song Dynasty in the published book by Li Jie.--<strong> +++$+++ ::::Oh those! Yes, I placed those pictures in the [[Architecture of the Song Dynasty]] article. And although I snapped the pictures with my camera from Needham's book, you do realize those drawings are not by Needham? They are actually 900 year old, drawn during the Song Dynasty in the published book by Li Jie.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 19:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
267003 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267000 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.187576520E09 +++$+++ Good question. With all the material I've written for the Architecture of the Song Dynasty article, I got sort of lazy and realized what I'd have to write if I made an entirely new article on the ''Yingzao Fashi''. Plus, I'm working on [[Augustus]] right now and getting it up to FA status eventually.--<strong> +++$+++ ::Good question. With all the material I've written for the Architecture of the Song Dynasty article, I got sort of lazy and realized what I'd have to write if I made an entirely new article on the ''Yingzao Fashi''. Plus, I'm working on [[Augustus]] right now and getting it up to FA status eventually.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 19:22, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
267004 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267000 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.187580540E09 +++$+++ Sure, you could start the article if you want to. It is a free encyclopedia afterall. Lol. I'll look over it once you've created it. Use the existing information in the Architecture of the Song Dynasty article, only reword it so it is not the exact same entry.--<strong> +++$+++ ::::Sure, you could start the article if you want to. It is a free encyclopedia afterall. Lol. I'll look over it once you've created it. Use the existing information in the Architecture of the Song Dynasty article, only reword it so it is not the exact same entry.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 20:29, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

529146 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-25 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.201297920E09 +++$+++ Hi- I will be taking a short break. I feel a litte discourage with some recent edits. One of them was with Bishop [[Fabian Bruskewitz]] of the Lincoln, Nebraska diocese. Someone put in what I thought was vandalism a paragraph about the sexual abuse scandal & with no citation added at all. Also I reverted changes in the [[Medford, Wisconsin]] article about notable people and got reverted. I just found out I was personally attack back in May of 2007 regarding the Medford, WI article. Consequently, I will be taking a short break. Besides, I have some things pertaing to my alma mater my high school this winter.I probably will come back after Monday January 28, 2008. Please send my greetings to the crew at WikiProject Wisconsin especially Users:OrangeMike and Merenta who edits the Waukesha related articles. Most likely I may will return sooner then Monday. Many thanks for your kindness and understanding. +++$+++ Hi- I will be taking a short break. I feel a litte discourage with some recent edits. One of them was with Bishop [[Fabian Bruskewitz]] of the Lincoln, Nebraska diocese. Someone put in what I thought was vandalism a paragraph about the sexual abuse scandal & with no citation added at all. Also I reverted changes in the [[Medford, Wisconsin]] article about notable people and got reverted. I just found out I was personally attack back in May of 2007 regarding the Medford, WI article. Consequently, I will be taking a short break. Besides, I have some things pertaing to my alma mater my high school this winter.I probably will come back after Monday January 28, 2008. Please send my greetings to the crew at WikiProject Wisconsin especially Users:OrangeMike and Merenta who edits the Waukesha related articles. Most likely I may will return sooner then Monday. Many thanks for your kindness and understanding.[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:52, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
529147 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529146 +++$+++ 529146 +++$+++ 2008-01-25 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.201303380E09 +++$+++ I have reverted both and given warnings to each of the other parties. The other editor on the [[Medford, Wisconsin]] article appears to be doing vanity edits. I didn't see any good edits from the account, and I saw several uncivil comments, so I gave a final warning. The edits to the Bruskewitz clearly violate [[WP:BLP]] since they are unsourced and very controversial, so I reverted them.  +++$+++ :I have reverted both and given warnings to each of the other parties. The other editor on the [[Medford, Wisconsin]] article appears to be doing vanity edits. I didn't see any good edits from the account, and I saw several uncivil comments, so I gave a final warning. The edits to the Bruskewitz clearly violate [[WP:BLP]] since they are unsourced and very controversial, so I reverted them. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 15:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
529148 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529146 +++$+++ 529147 +++$+++ 2008-01-25 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.201308180E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your help and kindness.  +++$+++ ::Many thanks for your help and kindness. [[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 16:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
529149 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529146 +++$+++ 529147 +++$+++ 2008-01-26 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.201384140E09 +++$+++ I did not stay away from Wikipedia too long as you can tell. Enjoy the trivia contest in Appleton. I still have Founders Day involving my alma mater Aquinas HS in La Crosse this weekend. I will not be doing too much with Wikipedia during that time.Thanks- +++$+++ :: I did not stay away from Wikipedia too long as you can tell. Enjoy the trivia contest in Appleton. I still have Founders Day involving my alma mater Aquinas HS in La Crosse this weekend. I will not be doing too much with Wikipedia during that time.Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
529150 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529146 +++$+++ 529149 +++$+++ 2008-01-26 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.201384440E09 +++$+++ Thanks! We were in 34th place at the first checkin at 3:00am, 5 hours into it. I got 4.5 hours of sleep last night.  +++$+++ :::Thanks! We were in 34th place at the first checkin at 3:00am, 5 hours into it. I got 4.5 hours of sleep last night. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 13:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
529151 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529146 +++$+++ 529147 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.201757100E09 +++$+++ Founders Day at Aquinas HS went well. I started an article about [[John Catlin]]. He was acting governor of the [[Wisconsin territory]] that was not part of Wisconsin when it was admitted to the union on [[May 29]], [[1848]]. I can not stay away from Wikipedia too long. Thanks- +++$+++ ::Founders Day at Aquinas HS went well. I started an article about [[John Catlin]]. He was acting governor of the [[Wisconsin territory]] that was not part of Wisconsin when it was admitted to the union on [[May 29]], [[1848]]. I can not stay away from Wikipedia too long. Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 21:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

267005 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-21 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.187762280E09 +++$+++ I blocked you? I thought I only had protected your userpage. There's no indication in your block log that I blocked you. <span style=\"background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;\"> +++$+++ I blocked you? I thought I only had protected your userpage. There's no indication in your block log that I blocked you. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span> 22:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
267006 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267005 +++$+++ 267005 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.187915580E09 +++$+++ I did not know that I was dealing with sockpuppets at the time. Thanks for informing me. <span style=\"background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;\"> +++$+++ :I did not know that I was dealing with sockpuppets at the time. Thanks for informing me. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span> 17:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

267007 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267007 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-22 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.187836740E09 +++$+++ May be I'm a nut case, but who knows what impact if any the article will have. By the way, thanks a lot for all of your suggestions and help.  +++$+++ May be I'm a nut case, but who knows what impact if any the article will have. By the way, thanks a lot for all of your suggestions and help. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 19:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
267008 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267007 +++$+++ 267007 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.187850300E09 +++$+++ Hey thanks, I could use the help, I have already taken care of a lot.  He must understand that Brazillians are not considered \"Hispanics\" in accordance to the U.S. definition (They speak Portuguise), they are however considered \"Latinos\" or \"Latin\" because they come from \"Latin-America\". You go figure.  +++$+++ *Hey thanks, I could use the help, I have already taken care of a lot.  He must understand that Brazillians are not considered "Hispanics" in accordance to the U.S. definition (They speak Portuguise), they are however considered "Latinos" or "Latin" because they come from "Latin-America". You go figure. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
267009 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267007 +++$+++ 267007 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.187852160E09 +++$+++ I have already \"marked\" the issues that I have taken care of. I have to take my wife to the supermarket for a couple of minutes. There isn't much left, but I would really appreciate your help.  +++$+++ :I have already "marked" the issues that I have taken care of. I have to take my wife to the supermarket for a couple of minutes. There isn't much left, but I would really appreciate your help. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
267010 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267007 +++$+++ 267007 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.187863980E09 +++$+++ Well, I have made a lot of changes and I realized that it was worth it. I hope that you will reconsider your vote, but if you don't it'll be O.K. with me. After all your suggestions did help make the article a better one then it was. Cheers!  +++$+++ *Well, I have made a lot of changes and I realized that it was worth it. I hope that you will reconsider your vote, but if you don't it'll be O.K. with me. After all your suggestions did help make the article a better one then it was. Cheers! [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

529152 +++$+++ Project FMF +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-26 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.201386840E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> [[User:Project FMF|Project FMF]] ([[User talk:Project FMF|talk]]) 14:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
529153 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529152 +++$+++ 529152 +++$+++ 2008-01-26 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.201387800E09 +++$+++ I don't mess with fair use anymore, so I removed it from the article so it can be deleted easier.  +++$+++ :I don't mess with fair use anymore, so I removed it from the article so it can be deleted easier. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 14:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

4866 +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-18 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.279437900E09 +++$+++ Yes, that is better. Thanks. I swapped the ref to http:\/\/www.ratemyprofessors.com\/top10Profs.jsp?tab=schools_top10 for you. Understand I am truly committed to making all universities in La. (public and private) look as best while keeping neutral POV as possible.  +++$+++ Yes, that is better. Thanks. I swapped the ref to http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/top10Profs.jsp?tab=schools_top10 for you. Understand I am truly committed to making all universities in La. (public and private) look as best while keeping neutral POV as possible. [[User:Aaron charles|Aaron charles]] ([[User talk:Aaron charles|talk]]) 00:25, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
4867 +++$+++ AllisonFoley +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4866 +++$+++ 4866 +++$+++ 2010-07-18 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.279440360E09 +++$+++ So does that mean that you are also going to delete all of the degrees listed on the ULL page for this reason like you did on the LA Tech page: ''removed lists of degrees. Wikipedia is not a directory, do not attempt to list every major, degree, or program offered per Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines''?  Are you going to delete ''The university is ... the only UL system campus to receive the latter doctoral distinction and among the top 5% of all U.S. colleges.'' from the ULL article like you deleted ''Designated as a Tier 3 National University, Louisiana Tech is the highest ranking academic institution in the [[University of Louisiana System]] as per the 2010 [[U.S. News & World Report]] [[College and university rankings#U.S. News & World Report College and University rankings|college rankings]].'' from the LA Tech article because ''refactoring rankings is prohibited as academic boosterism per Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines''?  +++$+++ :So does that mean that you are also going to delete all of the degrees listed on the ULL page for this reason like you did on the LA Tech page: ''removed lists of degrees. Wikipedia is not a directory, do not attempt to list every major, degree, or program offered per Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines''?  Are you going to delete ''The university is ... the only UL system campus to receive the latter doctoral distinction and among the top 5% of all U.S. colleges.'' from the ULL article like you deleted ''Designated as a Tier 3 National University, Louisiana Tech is the highest ranking academic institution in the [[University of Louisiana System]] as per the 2010 [[U.S. News & World Report]] [[College and university rankings#U.S. News & World Report College and University rankings|college rankings]].'' from the LA Tech article because ''refactoring rankings is prohibited as academic boosterism per Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines''? [[User:AllisonFoley|AllisonFoley]] ([[User talk:AllisonFoley|talk]]) 01:06, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
4868 +++$+++ AllisonFoley +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4866 +++$+++ 4867 +++$+++ 2010-07-18 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.279454160E09 +++$+++ You are telling me that ULL can say that they are the only UL System school classified as a Carnegie RU\/H, but LA Tech can't say that they are the only UL System school classified as a Tier 3 National Research University by USNWR? There is no difference between the two. The USNWR Tier classification system is much more common and has much greater widespread usage. The average Joe has never heard of the Carnegie system, but everybody knows what a USNWR Tier is. Also, since Tech is known as an \"engineering school,\" I find it ridiculous that you think Tech's various engineering disciplines can't be posted on Wikipedia. I also find it notable that LA Tech has the only nanosystems engineering program in the world, and that can't be posted. But you have no problem with posting stuff like \"UL Lafayette is recognized for numerous fields of study such as Environmental Science, Computer Science, Industrial Design, Francophone Studies, Engineering, Visual Arts, Music, Biological Science and Nursing. It offers Louisiana's only PhD in Francophone Studies, Cognitive Science and the only Industrial Design degree in the state of Louisiana.\" in the ULL intro. Are you going to delete this from the LSU page too? \"Additionally, U.S. News & World Report ranked LSU as the 16th most popular university in the nation, placing it ahead of other regional universities such as The University of Texas, The University of Georgia, and The University of Alabama.\" It looks like you need to bold all of the former names on the ULM page, too. The McNeese page needs policing too: \"McNeese is recognized for its excellent engineering program as well as its nursing program. Its creative writing program in English is nationally known for nurturing quality poets and fiction writers.[citation needed] It is the first university in the state of Louisiana to offer a concentration in Forensic Chemistry, and was one of the first schools in the nation to offer a concentration in Terrorism, Preparedness and Security.\" OMG! Emergency on the Nicholls (I mean, Berekeley on the Bayou) page! \"The school is sometimes referred to as \"Our Harvard on the Bayou;\" the university bookstore even sells shirts sporting this light-hearted nickname. More recently, however, students and faculty have been referring to Nicholls as \"Berkeley on the Bayou,\" because of the university's encouraging atmosphere towards creativity and innovation that goes hand-in-hand with faculty and student engagement.\" You need to go delete all the degrees on the LSUS and LSUA pages too.  +++$+++ ::You are telling me that ULL can say that they are the only UL System school classified as a Carnegie RU/H, but LA Tech can't say that they are the only UL System school classified as a Tier 3 National Research University by USNWR? There is no difference between the two. The USNWR Tier classification system is much more common and has much greater widespread usage. The average Joe has never heard of the Carnegie system, but everybody knows what a USNWR Tier is. Also, since Tech is known as an "engineering school," I find it ridiculous that you think Tech's various engineering disciplines can't be posted on Wikipedia. I also find it notable that LA Tech has the only nanosystems engineering program in the world, and that can't be posted. But you have no problem with posting stuff like "UL Lafayette is recognized for numerous fields of study such as Environmental Science, Computer Science, Industrial Design, Francophone Studies, Engineering, Visual Arts, Music, Biological Science and Nursing. It offers Louisiana's only PhD in Francophone Studies, Cognitive Science and the only Industrial Design degree in the state of Louisiana." in the ULL intro. Are you going to delete this from the LSU page too? "Additionally, U.S. News & World Report ranked LSU as the 16th most popular university in the nation, placing it ahead of other regional universities such as The University of Texas, The University of Georgia, and The University of Alabama." It looks like you need to bold all of the former names on the ULM page, too. The McNeese page needs policing too: "McNeese is recognized for its excellent engineering program as well as its nursing program. Its creative writing program in English is nationally known for nurturing quality poets and fiction writers.[citation needed] It is the first university in the state of Louisiana to offer a concentration in Forensic Chemistry, and was one of the first schools in the nation to offer a concentration in Terrorism, Preparedness and Security." OMG! Emergency on the Nicholls (I mean, Berekeley on the Bayou) page! "The school is sometimes referred to as "Our Harvard on the Bayou;" the university bookstore even sells shirts sporting this light-hearted nickname. More recently, however, students and faculty have been referring to Nicholls as "Berkeley on the Bayou," because of the university's encouraging atmosphere towards creativity and innovation that goes hand-in-hand with faculty and student engagement." You need to go delete all the degrees on the LSUS and LSUA pages too. [[User:AllisonFoley|AllisonFoley]] ([[User talk:AllisonFoley|talk]]) 04:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
4869 +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4866 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-18 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.279456260E09 +++$+++ As for the other all the other university articles that you mention, yes, I agree that they, too, can use some clean up.  +++$+++ ::::*As for the other all the other university articles that you mention, yes, I agree that they, too, can use some clean up. [[User:Aaron charles|Aaron charles]] ([[User talk:Aaron charles#top|talk]]) 05:31, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
4870 +++$+++ AllisonFoley +++$+++ Aaron charles +++$+++ 4866 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-18 06:17:00 +++$+++ 1.279459020E09 +++$+++ If you are \"improving\" the LA Tech article and believe that a simple rewording would make it compliant, why completely delete an important LA Tech classification instead of just editing it? You find it ok to have this: \"Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical & Computer Engineering, Engineering & Technology, Industrial Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Petroleum Engineering ,Telecommunications Engineering\" listed on ULL's page, but you completed deleted every discipline on the LA Tech page. You did not make a rebuttal to the academic boosterism I pointed out in the ULL article, so I deleted it. And I'm not giving you wiki assignments, just making a point. I couldn't care less what those pages say.  +++$+++ ::::If you are "improving" the LA Tech article and believe that a simple rewording would make it compliant, why completely delete an important LA Tech classification instead of just editing it? You find it ok to have this: "Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical & Computer Engineering, Engineering & Technology, Industrial Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Petroleum Engineering ,Telecommunications Engineering" listed on ULL's page, but you completed deleted every discipline on the LA Tech page. You did not make a rebuttal to the academic boosterism I pointed out in the ULL article, so I deleted it. And I'm not giving you wiki assignments, just making a point. I couldn't care less what those pages say. [[User:AllisonFoley|AllisonFoley]] ([[User talk:AllisonFoley|talk]]) 06:17, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

267011 +++$+++ IPSOS +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-22 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.187851380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the compliment. But I couldn't have done it without you. It was your noticing and informing me of the matching active\/inactive patterns that cinched the case, I believe.  +++$+++ Thanks for the compliment. But I couldn't have done it without you. It was your noticing and informing me of the matching active/inactive patterns that cinched the case, I believe. [[User:IPSOS|IPSOS]] ([[User talk:IPSOS|talk]]) 23:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
267012 +++$+++ IPSOS +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267011 +++$+++ 267011 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.187856780E09 +++$+++ You know, this user is way too obvious to be the same individual. Already back as [[User:Kremm|Kremm]]. From what I discovered when looking into [[User:999|999]] was that s\/he was much more devious than that. Care to help with reverting {{user5|Kremm}} attempts to disrupt an AfD? It can be incredibly theraputic. :-D  +++$+++ :You know, this user is way too obvious to be the same individual. Already back as [[User:Kremm|Kremm]]. From what I discovered when looking into [[User:999|999]] was that s/he was much more devious than that. Care to help with reverting {{user5|Kremm}} attempts to disrupt an AfD? It can be incredibly theraputic. :-D [[User:IPSOS|IPSOS]] ([[User talk:IPSOS|talk]]) 01:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
267013 +++$+++ IPSOS +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267011 +++$+++ 267012 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.187919060E09 +++$+++ Well, once there is actually a decision on the reports, it's a lot easier to show that an obvious sock is, well obvious, by pointing to the report. Until there has been a conclusion, it's unfortunately hard to get anybody to take a sock infestation seriously, no matter how bloody obvious they are.  +++$+++ ::Well, once there is actually a decision on the reports, it's a lot easier to show that an obvious sock is, well obvious, by pointing to the report. Until there has been a conclusion, it's unfortunately hard to get anybody to take a sock infestation seriously, no matter how bloody obvious they are. [[User:IPSOS|IPSOS]] ([[User talk:IPSOS|talk]]) 18:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
267014 +++$+++ IPSOS +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267011 +++$+++ 267013 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.187922000E09 +++$+++ Replied on my talk page, as another interested party had replied there.  +++$+++ :::Replied on my talk page, as another interested party had replied there. [[User:IPSOS|IPSOS]] ([[User talk:IPSOS|talk]]) 19:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

568790 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-02 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.157240280E09 +++$+++ Well done on passing your RfA and becoming an admin. Does this mean that you are admin#1001? I hope that you enjoy wielding the mop and bucket! Please ask if you have any questions about the role. Regards, <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Well done on passing your RfA and becoming an admin. Does this mean that you are admin#1001? I hope that you enjoy wielding the mop and bucket! Please ask if you have any questions about the role. Regards, <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''(aeropa'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''gitica)'''</font>]]</span> 16:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
568791 +++$+++ Netsnipe +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568790 +++$+++ 568790 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.157258460E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I would be #1000 if it wasn't for [[User:Dannyisme|Dannyisme's]] duplicate admin account! Actually, I do have one question for you, what tools and skins do you recommend for admin tasks? Cheers, <small><span style=\"border: 1px solid\"> +++$+++ :Thanks. I would be #1000 if it wasn't for [[User:Dannyisme|Dannyisme's]] duplicate admin account! Actually, I do have one question for you, what tools and skins do you recommend for admin tasks? Cheers, <small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[User:Netsnipe|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#003333"> &nbsp;Netsnipe&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Netsnipe|<span style="background-color:#003333; color:White">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 21:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

267015 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-23 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.187922720E09 +++$+++ I want to try to avoid a debate, it would only open the doors to others who may not understand and it would not be in the best interest of the FAC. I know that you have a better way with words and I was wondering if you would be kind enough to try to explain to him what the term reffers to. Maybe in his talk page. I would really appreciate it.  +++$+++ I want to try to avoid a debate, it would only open the doors to others who may not understand and it would not be in the best interest of the FAC. I know that you have a better way with words and I was wondering if you would be kind enough to try to explain to him what the term reffers to. Maybe in his talk page. I would really appreciate it. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 19:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
267016 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267015 +++$+++ 267015 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.187924940E09 +++$+++ I agree, you do make sense. Even the government is confused as to what they mean by the term that they have created. When I joined the Marines, you were either White, Black or Asian. It was kind of confussing because when I returned to the states 20 years later, I was suddenly told that I was a \"Hispanic\" and somehow I was no longer white, dispite the fact that my family are blond blue eyed and that the term is supposed to refer to an ethnicity which includes all races. That is why when I fill out a form which asks \"Race?\", I write \"Human\".  +++$+++ *I agree, you do make sense. Even the government is confused as to what they mean by the term that they have created. When I joined the Marines, you were either White, Black or Asian. It was kind of confussing because when I returned to the states 20 years later, I was suddenly told that I was a "Hispanic" and somehow I was no longer white, dispite the fact that my family are blond blue eyed and that the term is supposed to refer to an ethnicity which includes all races. That is why when I fill out a form which asks "Race?", I write "Human". [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 20:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
267017 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267015 +++$+++ 267015 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.187933640E09 +++$+++ Man, what an overhaul. I think that I am done and that all concerns have now been covered.  +++$+++ :Man, what an overhaul. I think that I am done and that all concerns have now been covered. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 22:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
267018 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267015 +++$+++ 267015 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.187937000E09 +++$+++ Hum, images are supposed to be set at default? You got me there. That is one thing I know nothing about (really). Cheers!  +++$+++ *Hum, images are supposed to be set at default? You got me there. That is one thing I know nothing about (really). Cheers! [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
267019 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267015 +++$+++ 267015 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.187938020E09 +++$+++ Please, be my guest and do it.  +++$+++ :Please, be my guest and do it. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

525100 +++$+++ Nephron +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-30 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.156932240E09 +++$+++ [[International Federation of Associations of Anatomists]] looked promising-- but it doesn't seem they have their catalogue online.  I ask 'cause someone renamed '[[peroneal artery]]' to '[[fibular artery]]' --something I disagree with for a number of reasons (see [[Talk:Fibular_artery]]).  AFAIK, ''fibular'' is not the prefered name-- but I wondered if there was some sort of \"official\" guide that this anonymous person knows about and I am unaware of.  Any thoughts?   +++$+++ [[International Federation of Associations of Anatomists]] looked promising-- but it doesn't seem they have their catalogue online.  I ask 'cause someone renamed '[[peroneal artery]]' to '[[fibular artery]]' --something I disagree with for a number of reasons (see [[Talk:Fibular_artery]]).  AFAIK, ''fibular'' is not the prefered name-- but I wondered if there was some sort of "official" guide that this anonymous person knows about and I am unaware of.  Any thoughts?  [[User:Nephron|Nephron]] <small>[[User_talk:Nephron|&nbsp;T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Nephron|C]]</small> 03:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
525101 +++$+++ Mauvila +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525100 +++$+++ 525100 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.157004840E09 +++$+++ I renamed it in accordance with the preferred name of the [[Terminologia Anatomica]] (TA), which is the joint IFAA\/FCAT (1998) standard for naming.  And according to IFAA, ''fibular'' IS the preferred name and for good reason.  While they say that peroneal is acceptable, it is not the preferred term.  ''Peroneal'' is the Greek derived version of ''fibular'' (a Latin term).  They used to call the ''fibula'' by its Greek version ''perone''. But eventually, the Latin term ''fibula'' became the standard (''tibia'' is also Latin).  So ''fibularis'', ''fibular artery'' are consistent with the bone, and thus the terms won the committee vote.  But there is also a very practical reason for ''fibular artery'', and that is because ''peroneal artery'' sounds very much like ''perineal artery'', and this can lead to confusion in a clinical setting.  So most modern textbooks eschew the ''peroneus'' designation all together.  The English version of the TA publication can be purchased from Amazon, but I think Mercksource-Dorland's has the Latin TA versions.  +++$+++ :I renamed it in accordance with the preferred name of the [[Terminologia Anatomica]] (TA), which is the joint IFAA/FCAT (1998) standard for naming.  And according to IFAA, ''fibular'' IS the preferred name and for good reason.  While they say that peroneal is acceptable, it is not the preferred term.  ''Peroneal'' is the Greek derived version of ''fibular'' (a Latin term).  They used to call the ''fibula'' by its Greek version ''perone''. But eventually, the Latin term ''fibula'' became the standard (''tibia'' is also Latin).  So ''fibularis'', ''fibular artery'' are consistent with the bone, and thus the terms won the committee vote.  But there is also a very practical reason for ''fibular artery'', and that is because ''peroneal artery'' sounds very much like ''perineal artery'', and this can lead to confusion in a clinical setting.  So most modern textbooks eschew the ''peroneus'' designation all together.  The English version of the TA publication can be purchased from Amazon, but I think Mercksource-Dorland's has the Latin TA versions. [[User:Mauvila|Mauvila]] 23:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
525102 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525100 +++$+++ 525101 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.157067900E09 +++$+++ <del>Response at [[Talk:Fibular artery]]<\/del> I need to do a little more research before responding, but I wanted to let you know I got your message. -- +++$+++ ::<del>Response at [[Talk:Fibular artery]]</del> I need to do a little more research before responding, but I wanted to let you know I got your message. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 16:45, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

538410 +++$+++ Dale Arnett +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538410 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-28 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.196305800E09 +++$+++ I was looking at your test template, and I noticed a remark on \"international broadcast information\". There's actually one bowl game that is regularly broadcast outside the USA \u2014 the [[International Bowl]], which is held in [[Toronto]] and broadcast in [[Canada]]. There's also an article on the [[2007 International Bowl|inaugural game in 2007]], which would be a good place for that idea. \u2014  +++$+++ I was looking at your test template, and I noticed a remark on "international broadcast information". There's actually one bowl game that is regularly broadcast outside the USA — the [[International Bowl]], which is held in [[Toronto]] and broadcast in [[Canada]]. There's also an article on the [[2007 International Bowl|inaugural game in 2007]], which would be a good place for that idea. — [[User:Dale Arnett|Dale Arnett]] ([[User talk:Dale Arnett|talk]]) 19:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
538411 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538410 +++$+++ 538410 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.196305920E09 +++$+++ You're right, that would be a good use for it. Guess I'll have to get around to adding that quicker than I expected.\u2194 +++$+++ :You're right, that would be a good use for it. Guess I'll have to get around to adding that quicker than I expected.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 19:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
538412 +++$+++ Group29 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538410 +++$+++ 538410 +++$+++ 2007-11-29 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.196390040E09 +++$+++ What you have so far is great IMHO and could be implemented as the replacement for the NCAAFootballSingleGameHeader. Thanks!  +++$+++ :What you have so far is great IMHO and could be implemented as the replacement for the NCAAFootballSingleGameHeader. Thanks! [[User:Group29|Group29]] ([[User talk:Group29|talk]]) 18:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
538413 +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538410 +++$+++ 538412 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.196488440E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to say thanks for the fantastic job you did on this infobox. It's really nice looking, and worked out pretty darn well. I've thrown it up on the [[2006 Chick-fil-A bowl]] article that spawned this whole process, and it looks awesome. If you've got the time, I'd appreciate it if you could swing by [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/2006 Chick-fil-A Bowl|the FAC page]] and leave some comments or support. I'd really appreciate it, since you (indirectly) contributed to its success.  +++$+++ ::Just wanted to say thanks for the fantastic job you did on this infobox. It's really nice looking, and worked out pretty darn well. I've thrown it up on the [[2006 Chick-fil-A bowl]] article that spawned this whole process, and it looks awesome. If you've got the time, I'd appreciate it if you could swing by [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2006 Chick-fil-A Bowl|the FAC page]] and leave some comments or support. I'd really appreciate it, since you (indirectly) contributed to its success. [[User:JKBrooks85|JKBrooks85]] 21:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

4875 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Jwad +++$+++ 4875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-29 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.246275240E09 +++$+++ Hey Jwad, since you are a stupendous Madonna fan, can you find me some info regarding the background story behind the song \"[[Sorry (Madonna song)|Sorry]]\"? And cheers, look at \"[[Hung Up]]\" being nominated for GA. Thats the tenth Madonna article up for GA. Yayyy !!!<font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ Hey Jwad, since you are a stupendous Madonna fan, can you find me some info regarding the background story behind the song "[[Sorry (Madonna song)|Sorry]]"? And cheers, look at "[[Hung Up]]" being nominated for GA. Thats the tenth Madonna article up for GA. Yayyy !!!<font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 04:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
4876 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Jwad +++$+++ 4875 +++$+++ 4875 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.246464660E09 +++$+++ I invite you to join [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council\/Proposals\/Madonna|the Madonna Wikiproject]]. <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :I invite you to join [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Madonna|the Madonna Wikiproject]]. <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 09:11, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

529164 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-29 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.201671120E09 +++$+++ Several times I have found my watchlist glowing with your edits related to combining the various Christian music WikiProjects into one. You should consider getting an [[WP:AWB|Auto Wiki Browser]] to automate this process. You should easily be here long enough to meet the requirements. You shouldn't need to have anyone vouch for you, but I would if you need it.  +++$+++ Several times I have found my watchlist glowing with your edits related to combining the various Christian music WikiProjects into one. You should consider getting an [[WP:AWB|Auto Wiki Browser]] to automate this process. You should easily be here long enough to meet the requirements. You shouldn't need to have anyone vouch for you, but I would if you need it. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 21:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
529165 +++$+++ Absolon +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529164 +++$+++ 529164 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.201719420E09 +++$+++ Thanks I haven't had a chance to really research AWB yet. Since most of the major project edits are done I probably won't be doing a lot of heavy lifting like that for a while. If something else comes up I'll look deeper into it. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Thanks I haven't had a chance to really research AWB yet. Since most of the major project edits are done I probably won't be doing a lot of heavy lifting like that for a while. If something else comes up I'll look deeper into it. Thanks again. [[User:Absolon|Absolon S. Kent]] ([[User talk:Absolon|talk]]) 10:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

267021 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-24 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.187940540E09 +++$+++ Take care.--<strong> +++$+++ Take care.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 00:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
267022 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267021 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.187940720E09 +++$+++ P.S. - Check out what I've done to [[Augustus]], it is also now an FAC.--<strong> +++$+++ ::P.S. - Check out what I've done to [[Augustus]], it is also now an FAC.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 00:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

529166 +++$+++ Pepsi2786 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529166 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-30 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.201693320E09 +++$+++ My only concern is that your rating system is a bit too bottom heavy. Perhaps combine the top two categories into Top Importance, move Mid up to High, and add in a Mid category for extremely important aspects within one of our areas, such as famous bands, or whatever, and let the low importance stuff include the less important bands. I don't think it's right for a band like [[dc talk]] or [[Jars of Clay]] to be rated as low importance, when it's going to be getting a lot more traffic than a band like [[Blaster the Rocket Man]], and therefore needs to be of a higher quality. --  +++$+++ My only concern is that your rating system is a bit too bottom heavy. Perhaps combine the top two categories into Top Importance, move Mid up to High, and add in a Mid category for extremely important aspects within one of our areas, such as famous bands, or whatever, and let the low importance stuff include the less important bands. I don't think it's right for a band like [[dc talk]] or [[Jars of Clay]] to be rated as low importance, when it's going to be getting a lot more traffic than a band like [[Blaster the Rocket Man]], and therefore needs to be of a higher quality. -- [[User:Pepsi2786|<font color="blue"><b>PEPSI2786</b></font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Pepsi2786|<font color="000000"><b>talk</b></font>]]</sup> 03:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
529167 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529166 +++$+++ 529166 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.201694340E09 +++$+++ I would put dc talk and Jars of Clay both at \"High\" importance because they are well known even to mainstream audiences (especially Jars of Clay).  +++$+++ :I would put dc talk and Jars of Clay both at "High" importance because they are well known even to mainstream audiences (especially Jars of Clay). [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 03:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
529168 +++$+++ Absolon +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529166 +++$+++ 529167 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.201719420E09 +++$+++ I moved the discussion to the Project's discussion page.  +++$+++ ::I moved the discussion to the Project's discussion page. [[User:Absolon|Absolon S. Kent]] ([[User talk:Absolon|talk]]) 10:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

529169 +++$+++ Tagishsimon +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-01 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.201865880E09 +++$+++ FYI: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Tarck bike]]. You seemed to think it had promise & might want to fight its corner. -- +++$+++ FYI: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarck bike]]. You seemed to think it had promise & might want to fight its corner. --[[User:Tagishsimon|Tagishsimon]] [[User_talk:Tagishsimon|(talk)]] 03:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
529170 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529169 +++$+++ 529169 +++$+++ 2008-02-01 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.201865940E09 +++$+++ Thank you for notifying me, but I'll pass at this time. I do think that it deserves its time at AFD.  +++$+++ :Thank you for notifying me, but I'll pass at this time. I do think that it deserves its time at AFD. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 03:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

267026 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267026 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-24 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.187992200E09 +++$+++ I would also like to thank you for all of your help. The complete overhaul of the FAC is complete and I hope that I now merit your '''\"support\"''' on the FAC. Believe me that I am sincere when I tell you that one of the pleasures that I have received in this whole thing has been interacting with you. Even though my time for major contributions are now limited, I hope that you won't mind if once in a while I drop in on you when I need a second opinion. Cheers!  +++$+++ I would also like to thank you for all of your help. The complete overhaul of the FAC is complete and I hope that I now merit your '''"support"''' on the FAC. Believe me that I am sincere when I tell you that one of the pleasures that I have received in this whole thing has been interacting with you. Even though my time for major contributions are now limited, I hope that you won't mind if once in a while I drop in on you when I need a second opinion. Cheers! [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 14:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
267027 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267026 +++$+++ 267026 +++$+++ 2007-08-25 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.188095160E09 +++$+++ Re:Comment, thank you once more. I took your advice, as always. You have a great way of communicating things (smile).  +++$+++ *Re:Comment, thank you once more. I took your advice, as always. You have a great way of communicating things (smile). [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 19:26, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

529171 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529171 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-01 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.201906920E09 +++$+++ Thanks for doing the DYK update - I saw it was overdue, but had no time to do the notifications (though I would have had time just to copy to the main template and purge the cache). Has there ever been discussion of having a bot do the notices (perhaps with the name of the admin who did the Update given, in case there were questions)?  +++$+++ Thanks for doing the DYK update - I saw it was overdue, but had no time to do the notifications (though I would have had time just to copy to the main template and purge the cache). Has there ever been discussion of having a bot do the notices (perhaps with the name of the admin who did the Update given, in case there were questions)? [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 15:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
529172 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529171 +++$+++ 529171 +++$+++ 2008-02-01 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.201907640E09 +++$+++ Having bots to update the template were proposed several times, with the last time [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know\/Archive_24#Bot here]. I don't remember reading a proposal that a bot would do the notifications. It sounds like a good concept.  +++$+++ :Having bots to update the template were proposed several times, with the last time [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know/Archive_24#Bot here]. I don't remember reading a proposal that a bot would do the notifications. It sounds like a good concept. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 15:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
529173 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529171 +++$+++ 529172 +++$+++ 2008-02-01 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.201912920E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the link. I will try and bring it up on the DYK talk in a day or two, along with the idea to have a \"DYK update how to guide\" for inexperienced admins - perhaps if there was a clear guide, more admins would help. I also think it would be a place to put information like the script from Lar, and whatever other time saving ideas\/tricks people have. Thanks again,  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the link. I will try and bring it up on the DYK talk in a day or two, along with the idea to have a "DYK update how to guide" for inexperienced admins - perhaps if there was a clear guide, more admins would help. I also think it would be a place to put information like the script from Lar, and whatever other time saving ideas/tricks people have. Thanks again, [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 16:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
529174 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529171 +++$+++ 529173 +++$+++ 2008-02-01 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.201913040E09 +++$+++ Excellent. Please paste in a link for me so I can help contribute to the discussion. I do find the scripts difficult to run on my relatively slow broadband and on my slower PC.  +++$+++ :::Excellent. Please paste in a link for me so I can help contribute to the discussion. I do find the scripts difficult to run on my relatively slow broadband and on my slower PC. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 16:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
529175 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529171 +++$+++ 529174 +++$+++ 2008-02-02 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.201958760E09 +++$+++ Thanks, it is here: [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Suggestions]]  +++$+++ ::::Thanks, it is here: [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Suggestions]] [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 05:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

4884 +++$+++ Metropolitan90 +++$+++ Jwad +++$+++ 4884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-27 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.256676120E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you tagged this article for the [[WP:AFD|Articles for deletion]] process, but your edit summary indicated that you were submitting it for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]]. Which one did you mean? -- +++$+++ I noticed that you tagged this article for the [[WP:AFD|Articles for deletion]] process, but your edit summary indicated that you were submitting it for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]]. Which one did you mean? --[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] [[User talk:Metropolitan90|(talk)]] 13:42, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
4885 +++$+++ Tedder +++$+++ Jwad +++$+++ 4884 +++$+++ 4884 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.256693520E09 +++$+++ Indeed, the AFD you submitted was entirely incorrect, as was modifying an archived AFD page. Let us know if we can help; for now, I reverted [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FWorld_sales_and_certifications_for_Madonna&action=historysubmit&diff=322298073&oldid=227810011 your changes to the AFD page] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=World_sales_and_certifications_for_Madonna&diff=prev&oldid=321820530 to the article page].  +++$+++ :Indeed, the AFD you submitted was entirely incorrect, as was modifying an archived AFD page. Let us know if we can help; for now, I reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FWorld_sales_and_certifications_for_Madonna&action=historysubmit&diff=322298073&oldid=227810011 your changes to the AFD page] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_sales_and_certifications_for_Madonna&diff=prev&oldid=321820530 to the article page]. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 18:32, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

529176 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529176 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-02 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.202014320E09 +++$+++ Could you please look at the article [[Brandyn Tracy]]? I think it should be speedily deleted. It is either a hoax or vanity page. Thank you- +++$+++ Could you please look at the article [[Brandyn Tracy]]? I think it should be speedily deleted. It is either a hoax or vanity page. Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 20:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
529177 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529176 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-03 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.202081280E09 +++$+++ Thank you- +++$+++ ::Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 15:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

267034 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-26 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.188176280E09 +++$+++ I though they made a mistake to take the disputed area as the whole name of South Tibet.In fact,the whole Tibet or Tibetan Plateau is divided into 4 parts North Tibet,South Tibet,East Tibet and West Tibet.South Tibet also includes some large city such as [[Shigatse]].The Asia Time journalist may mistranlate the chinese diplomatic words.-- +++$+++ I though they made a mistake to take the disputed area as the whole name of South Tibet.In fact,the whole Tibet or Tibetan Plateau is divided into 4 parts North Tibet,South Tibet,East Tibet and West Tibet.South Tibet also includes some large city such as [[Shigatse]].The Asia Time journalist may mistranlate the chinese diplomatic words.--[[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]]([[User_talk:Ksyrie|Talkie talkie]]) 17:58, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
267035 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267034 +++$+++ 267034 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.188176400E09 +++$+++ Just check the [[Shannan Prefecture]] which is part of South Tibet and it covers the disputed land,but much larger.-- +++$+++ :Just check the [[Shannan Prefecture]] which is part of South Tibet and it covers the disputed land,but much larger.--[[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]]([[User_talk:Ksyrie|Talkie talkie]]) 18:00, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
267036 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267034 +++$+++ 267035 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.188176760E09 +++$+++ The fact is that the sources themselves dont agree.Following what I had read such,I mean South Tibet as a larger region as well as North Tibet is the best interpretation.Meanwhile,the disputed land also falls into the coverage of South Tibet.-- +++$+++ ::The fact is that the sources themselves dont agree.Following what I had read such,I mean South Tibet as a larger region as well as North Tibet is the best interpretation.Meanwhile,the disputed land also falls into the coverage of South Tibet.--[[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]]([[User_talk:Ksyrie|Talkie talkie]]) 18:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
267037 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267034 +++$+++ 267036 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.188176880E09 +++$+++ Check these link [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?q=Shigatse+South+Tibet&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B3GGGL_frFR177FR215&um=1&sa=N&tab=wp][[Shigatse]],a town far from the disputed land is also within the South Tibet.-- +++$+++ :::Check these link [http://books.google.com/books?q=Shigatse+South+Tibet&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B3GGGL_frFR177FR215&um=1&sa=N&tab=wp][[Shigatse]],a town far from the disputed land is also within the South Tibet.--[[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]]([[User_talk:Ksyrie|Talkie talkie]]) 18:08, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

262959 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-03 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.215144600E09 +++$+++ Hi, Colin, wrt the GA nomination, would you like me to take it on, or should I wait for its FAC, or should I do nothing for the time being? What do you think? (worried about collusion),  Graham.  +++$+++ Hi, Colin, wrt the GA nomination, would you like me to take it on, or should I wait for its FAC, or should I do nothing for the time being? What do you think? (worried about collusion),  Graham. [[User:GrahamColm|Graham<font color="red">Colm</font>]][[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
262960 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262959 +++$+++ 262959 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.215147120E09 +++$+++ Since the GA nom is still recent, let's see if I can get some fresh eyes and a hard time from someone new. I can ask you any time (and will do) and your opinion is more valuable to me than a little green badge. If nobody reviews it, then I'd be delighted if you cast a critical eye over it. Similarly, if you want to help edit (e.g., on the Mechanism section for which I have plenty sources but are mostly a bit beyond my understanding) then that shouldn't preclude you participating at FAC provide we're open about any contribution. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Since the GA nom is still recent, let's see if I can get some fresh eyes and a hard time from someone new. I can ask you any time (and will do) and your opinion is more valuable to me than a little green badge. If nobody reviews it, then I'd be delighted if you cast a critical eye over it. Similarly, if you want to help edit (e.g., on the Mechanism section for which I have plenty sources but are mostly a bit beyond my understanding) then that shouldn't preclude you participating at FAC provide we're open about any contribution. Cheers, [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
262961 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262959 +++$+++ 262960 +++$+++ 2008-07-04 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.215174540E09 +++$+++ Okay Colin. I'll keep watching for now.  +++$+++ ::Okay Colin. I'll keep watching for now. [[User:GrahamColm|Graham<font color="red">Colm</font>]][[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 05:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
262962 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262959 +++$+++ 262961 +++$+++ 2008-07-06 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.215391800E09 +++$+++ Hard time duly provided! This is a pretty good article, but I've found some things that might be improved.  +++$+++ :::Hard time duly provided! This is a pretty good article, but I've found some things that might be improved. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 17:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
262963 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262959 +++$+++ 262960 +++$+++ 2008-07-07 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.215497460E09 +++$+++ I'm just off to the pub, but I'll try to take a look at this tomorrow.  +++$+++ ::I'm just off to the pub, but I'll try to take a look at this tomorrow. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 23:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

4892 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Jwad +++$+++ 4892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-14 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.263496800E09 +++$+++ I have seen from your contributions that you add content a number of times without sourcing it and hence my statement in the edit summary. If it made you feel bad, I can't help it. I have told you before also that such additions will be removed but you don't seem to heed them. Take your call. <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ I have seen from your contributions that you add content a number of times without sourcing it and hence my statement in the edit summary. If it made you feel bad, I can't help it. I have told you before also that such additions will be removed but you don't seem to heed them. Take your call. <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 11:20, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
4893 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Jwad +++$+++ 4892 +++$+++ 4892 +++$+++ 2010-01-14 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.263498960E09 +++$+++ I am sorry if my tone hurt you in any way. I apologize profusely. I really want you to contribute more and more so that the Madonna articles become the best of the bunch in wikipedia. I'm doing as much as I can and sometimes it becomes a little stressful if somebody adds something unsourced and then I have to revert it. - the reason for the edit summary being snarky. :( <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :I am sorry if my tone hurt you in any way. I apologize profusely. I really want you to contribute more and more so that the Madonna articles become the best of the bunch in wikipedia. I'm doing as much as I can and sometimes it becomes a little stressful if somebody adds something unsourced and then I have to revert it. - the reason for the edit summary being snarky. :( <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 11:56, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
4894 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Jwad +++$+++ 4892 +++$+++ 4893 +++$+++ 2010-01-14 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.263499860E09 +++$+++ Okie dokie. :) So I read that you are an artist and live in England? What kind of art medium do you specialise in? By the way, did you went to see any of Madonna's tours? <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ ::Okie dokie. :) So I read that you are an artist and live in England? What kind of art medium do you specialise in? By the way, did you went to see any of Madonna's tours? <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 12:11, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
4895 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Jwad +++$+++ 4892 +++$+++ 4894 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.263557040E09 +++$+++ OMG really? August 16, 2006 Wembley arena? Even I was there for the Confessions Tour! And near the main platform! I went to all the Madonna tours except the first three. Was too small at that time. <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :::OMG really? August 16, 2006 Wembley arena? Even I was there for the Confessions Tour! And near the main platform! I went to all the Madonna tours except the first three. Was too small at that time. <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 04:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
4896 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Jwad +++$+++ 4892 +++$+++ 4895 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.263816900E09 +++$+++ It indeed is a small world. :) Maybe I might have been beside you and we never knew! By the way, do you have friends who went to the Re-Invention and Drowned World Tours? Actually we need free images for those tours as we hardly have any. Can you ask them if they wanna contribute to the project? <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ ::::It indeed is a small world. :) Maybe I might have been beside you and we never knew! By the way, do you have friends who went to the Re-Invention and Drowned World Tours? Actually we need free images for those tours as we hardly have any. Can you ask them if they wanna contribute to the project? <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 04:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
4897 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Jwad +++$+++ 4892 +++$+++ 4896 +++$+++ 2010-01-19 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.263901500E09 +++$+++ Sigh. I know, even my pictures from Confessions were terrible wih red-eyes and stuff. For the other tours I took an analog camera and those pics are left at my hometown. However, I guess for the first three tours, it is impossible to find images. The Madonna wikiproject has really set the bar high for the songs, albums, and tour articles. Every song and album articles at GA is adopting and developing their articles based on the Madonna article formats. I'm so proud of it. <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :::::Sigh. I know, even my pictures from Confessions were terrible wih red-eyes and stuff. For the other tours I took an analog camera and those pics are left at my hometown. However, I guess for the first three tours, it is impossible to find images. The Madonna wikiproject has really set the bar high for the songs, albums, and tour articles. Every song and album articles at GA is adopting and developing their articles based on the Madonna article formats. I'm so proud of it. <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 03:45, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

267039 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267039 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-26 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.188178500E09 +++$+++ Comments on the talk page are not a substitute for reading the article. Regards,-- +++$+++ Comments on the talk page are not a substitute for reading the article. Regards,--[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 18:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
267040 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267039 +++$+++ 267039 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.188178620E09 +++$+++ You seem rather wound up. Please calm down. Regards, -- +++$+++ :You seem rather wound up. Please calm down. Regards, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 18:37, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
267041 +++$+++ Nat Krause +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267039 +++$+++ 267040 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.188185040E09 +++$+++ It's difficult to tell, but I imagine this section is supposed to be in response to me. It's true that I am feeling a bit wound up, and the reason for this is simply that having content disputes with people who are either unwilling or unable to discuss them in a cogent fashion and who are ''at the same time'' arrogant and insulting about it is extremely frustrating, and the fact that this is necessary is highly detrimental to Wikipedia. However, in addition to recommending for me to calm down, you may wish to examine your own behaviour in this situation.&mdash; +++$+++ ::It's difficult to tell, but I imagine this section is supposed to be in response to me. It's true that I am feeling a bit wound up, and the reason for this is simply that having content disputes with people who are either unwilling or unable to discuss them in a cogent fashion and who are ''at the same time'' arrogant and insulting about it is extremely frustrating, and the fact that this is necessary is highly detrimental to Wikipedia. However, in addition to recommending for me to calm down, you may wish to examine your own behaviour in this situation.&mdash;[[User:Nat Krause|Nat Krause]]<sup>([[User talk:Nat Krause|Talk!]]·[[Special:Contributions/Nat Krause|What have I done?]])</sup> 20:24, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
267042 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267039 +++$+++ 267041 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.188185220E09 +++$+++ Actually, all I have done is take the article [[South Tibet]] off my watchlist as I do not waste my time with such situations. Perhaps you should do the same. Regards, -- +++$+++ :::Actually, all I have done is take the article [[South Tibet]] off my watchlist as I do not waste my time with such situations. Perhaps you should do the same. Regards, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 20:27, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
267043 +++$+++ Nat Krause +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267039 +++$+++ 267042 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.188185460E09 +++$+++ Indeed, that is a very reasonable response. Doing so would resolve my sense of personal frustration. However, the overall result of resolving content disputes this way would be even more detrimental to the functioning of Wikipedia.&mdash; +++$+++ ::::Indeed, that is a very reasonable response. Doing so would resolve my sense of personal frustration. However, the overall result of resolving content disputes this way would be even more detrimental to the functioning of Wikipedia.&mdash;[[User:Nat Krause|Nat Krause]]<sup>([[User talk:Nat Krause|Talk!]]·[[Special:Contributions/Nat Krause|What have I done?]])</sup> 20:31, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

529184 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-11 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.202749920E09 +++$+++ Will do. Could I also ask a favour - could you have a look at [[Max Mosley]] - I'd like to know if it's comprehensible to someone who doesn't have a Euro racing background. And indeed any other comments you may have. Cheers.  +++$+++ Will do. Could I also ask a favour - could you have a look at [[Max Mosley]] - I'd like to know if it's comprehensible to someone who doesn't have a Euro racing background. And indeed any other comments you may have. Cheers. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] ([[User talk:4u1e|talk]]) 09:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
529185 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529184 +++$+++ 529184 +++$+++ 2008-02-11 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.202760720E09 +++$+++ Sure, but it probably will take me a several days to get to it.  +++$+++ :Sure, but it probably will take me a several days to get to it. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 12:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
529186 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529184 +++$+++ 529185 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 08:40:00 +++$+++ 1.202834400E09 +++$+++ Well, you were quicker off the mark than I was! It may take me a little time as I'm reconstructing the floor in our spare bedroom (having made a mental note to get the surveyor to do a proper job before I next buy a house!). Cheers.  +++$+++ ::Well, you were quicker off the mark than I was! It may take me a little time as I'm reconstructing the floor in our spare bedroom (having made a mental note to get the surveyor to do a proper job before I next buy a house!). Cheers. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] ([[User talk:4u1e|talk]]) 08:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
529187 +++$+++ Tommy turrell +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529184 +++$+++ 529186 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.202942880E09 +++$+++ Extending my thanks to you for your peer review the comments are really useful, it\u2019s always useful to get a fresh pair of eyes!  +++$+++ :::Extending my thanks to you for your peer review the comments are really useful, it’s always useful to get a fresh pair of eyes! [[User:Tommy turrell|Tommy turrell]] ([[User talk:Tommy turrell|talk]]) 14:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

267044 +++$+++ Cuchullain +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-26 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.188196680E09 +++$+++ Are you upset with me over the Missing Wikipedians page? If so, I'm sorry. The reason that \"rule\" (and it isn't even a hard and fast rule, because this isn't on the mainspace) exists is so there will be some standard ensuring the page won't get unmanageably long or too full of users who made only a few edits. I personally think 1000 edits is a fair standard, I'm sorry you disagree.-- +++$+++ Are you upset with me over the Missing Wikipedians page? If so, I'm sorry. The reason that "rule" (and it isn't even a hard and fast rule, because this isn't on the mainspace) exists is so there will be some standard ensuring the page won't get unmanageably long or too full of users who made only a few edits. I personally think 1000 edits is a fair standard, I'm sorry you disagree.--[[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 23:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
267045 +++$+++ Cuchullain +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267044 +++$+++ 267044 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.188198120E09 +++$+++ I do think it's unfair to blame me for that rule. I didn't come up with it.-- +++$+++ :I do think it's unfair to blame me for that rule. I didn't come up with it.--[[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 00:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
267046 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267044 +++$+++ 267045 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.188198840E09 +++$+++ In reality there is not a  \"rule\". You have taken it upon yourself to enforce something according to your whim. The page is not \"too long\" and the emotional effect of an editor on the community may not be synonymous will number of edits. [[User:Timmy12]]'s leaving certainly  had an effect not related to number of edits. Ask [[User:Salix alba]] who was upset and  [[User:BostonMA]] who left partially as a result. And I would guess the other editors with too few edits had an effect also. For the length of time Wikipedia has been going on, the page is amazingly short.   -- +++$+++ ::In reality there is not a  "rule". You have taken it upon yourself to enforce something according to your whim. The page is not "too long" and the emotional effect of an editor on the community may not be synonymous will number of edits. [[User:Timmy12]]'s leaving certainly  had an effect not related to number of edits. Ask [[User:Salix alba]] who was upset and  [[User:BostonMA]] who left partially as a result. And I would guess the other editors with too few edits had an effect also. For the length of time Wikipedia has been going on, the page is amazingly short.   --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 00:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

267047 +++$+++ IPSOS +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267047 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-27 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.188201660E09 +++$+++ Both [[User:JMax555|JMax555]] and [[User:SynergeticMaggot|SynergeticMaggot]] are, to my knowledge, unique individuals. I have no suspicion that they might be sockpuppets. Really, I don't want to get involved in your hunt to right past wrongs or whatever. That seems pointless. If there is a problem in an article and it looks like sockpuppetry, then I do something about it. I'm sorry, but hunting for puppets when there is no particular problem to be addressed seems disruptive to me.  +++$+++ Both [[User:JMax555|JMax555]] and [[User:SynergeticMaggot|SynergeticMaggot]] are, to my knowledge, unique individuals. I have no suspicion that they might be sockpuppets. Really, I don't want to get involved in your hunt to right past wrongs or whatever. That seems pointless. If there is a problem in an article and it looks like sockpuppetry, then I do something about it. I'm sorry, but hunting for puppets when there is no particular problem to be addressed seems disruptive to me. [[User:IPSOS|IPSOS]] ([[User talk:IPSOS|talk]]) 01:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
267048 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267047 +++$+++ 267047 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.188201960E09 +++$+++ It is idle speculation like before when I posted on your page regarding this. I have no problems of my own. I will refrain from keeping an eye out and spare you my musings and not post on your page in the future.  Regards, -- +++$+++ :It is idle speculation like before when I posted on your page regarding this. I have no problems of my own. I will refrain from keeping an eye out and spare you my musings and not post on your page in the future.  Regards, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 01:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
267049 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267047 +++$+++ 267048 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.188202200E09 +++$+++ There! You are off my watchlist. So, goodbye! Regards, -- +++$+++ ::There! You are off my watchlist. So, goodbye! Regards, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 01:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

529193 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.203221460E09 +++$+++ I came across an interesting article about [[Capital punishment in Wisconsin]]. I added the Wisconsin Historical Society dictionary term and made the article part of WikiProject Wisconsin.Ypu may want to see it-I thought it was a good article, Thank you- +++$+++ I came across an interesting article about [[Capital punishment in Wisconsin]]. I added the Wisconsin Historical Society dictionary term and made the article part of WikiProject Wisconsin.Ypu may want to see it-I thought it was a good article, Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 20:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
529194 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529193 +++$+++ 529193 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.203325320E09 +++$+++ Anons don't get lifetime bans, even when they're bad like this one. There has to be recent vandalism to give a block, for blocks are only given to protect the encyclopedia.  +++$+++ :Anons don't get lifetime bans, even when they're bad like this one. There has to be recent vandalism to give a block, for blocks are only given to protect the encyclopedia. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 01:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

267050 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-27 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.188204600E09 +++$+++ How is it that individual people are allowed to unilaterally remove names from the list when there are no firm inclusion criteria other than that the person has actually left? I really do not understand. The people I added were involved in a traumatic siltation that involved many editors. I believe these persons should be remembered as my heart is still heavy over their loss.  Regards,  -- +++$+++ How is it that individual people are allowed to unilaterally remove names from the list when there are no firm inclusion criteria other than that the person has actually left? I really do not understand. The people I added were involved in a traumatic siltation that involved many editors. I believe these persons should be remembered as my heart is still heavy over their loss.  Regards,  --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 01:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
267051 +++$+++ Cuchullain +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267050 +++$+++ 267050 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.188221580E09 +++$+++ If you had a question for me, you should have inquired at my talk page. The 1000 edits thing is not something I just made up, it reflects a very long standing consensus on maintaining the page, and was being used as a standard criteria before I even discovered MW. At any rate, it's certainly not worth edit warring over.-- +++$+++ :If you had a question for me, you should have inquired at my talk page. The 1000 edits thing is not something I just made up, it reflects a very long standing consensus on maintaining the page, and was being used as a standard criteria before I even discovered MW. At any rate, it's certainly not worth edit warring over.--[[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 06:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

529195 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529195 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-19 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.203457620E09 +++$+++ I think you should add the ice skating photo at [[Tilleda, Wisconsin]]. Many thanks- +++$+++ I think you should add the ice skating photo at [[Tilleda, Wisconsin]]. Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
529196 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529195 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-19 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.203469260E09 +++$+++ My apologies-I am getting over from a nasty bout of the flu and probably misread the messege. I like the photos. The store at [[Waukau, Wisconsin]] was one of the ones I like. I don't know too muck about car racing- but I am glad the ice is thick enough to hold the weight of the cars. Thanks- +++$+++ ::My apologies-I am getting over from a nasty bout of the flu and probably misread the messege. I like the photos. The store at [[Waukau, Wisconsin]] was one of the ones I like. I don't know too muck about car racing- but I am glad the ice is thick enough to hold the weight of the cars. Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 17:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

267052 +++$+++ IPSOS +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267052 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-27 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.188205860E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians]]. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. <!-- {{3RR|Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians}} -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians]]. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. <!-- {{3RR|Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians}} --> [[User:IPSOS|IPSOS]] ([[User talk:IPSOS|talk]]) 02:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
267053 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267052 +++$+++ 267052 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.188206220E09 +++$+++ I have no intention of edit warring. I do not engage in those. That is the first revert I have ever reverted. I don't intend to do it again. -- +++$+++ :I have no intention of edit warring. I do not engage in those. That is the first revert I have ever reverted. I don't intend to do it again. --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 02:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
267054 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267052 +++$+++ 267053 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.188206460E09 +++$+++ I will also add that I was just followng [[User:Cuchullain]]'s rules in removing names. Your actions are at odds with his. I will seek clarification from others. -- +++$+++ ::I will also add that I was just followng [[User:Cuchullain]]'s rules in removing names. Your actions are at odds with his. I will seek clarification from others. --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 02:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

588689 +++$+++ Chrissy385 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ 588689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-03 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.207278660E09 +++$+++ MECU, you tagged an image I uploaded for NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.) The file is from a U.S. government website, and as far as I know, it is therefore in the public domain as long as indicated, which it currently is. If further action needs to be taken, I'm not sure what it is. Sorry, I'm not really familiar with these procedures. If you have further questions, let me know on my talk page.  +++$+++ MECU, you tagged an image I uploaded for NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.) The file is from a U.S. government website, and as far as I know, it is therefore in the public domain as long as indicated, which it currently is. If further action needs to be taken, I'm not sure what it is. Sorry, I'm not really familiar with these procedures. If you have further questions, let me know on my talk page. [[User:Chrissy385|Chrissy385]] ([[User talk:Chrissy385|talk]]) 20:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
588690 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ 588689 +++$+++ 588689 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.207286220E09 +++$+++ The problem is that the current source information isn't very specific on where you got the image. Yes that agency is probably a federal government agency, so the image is likely free, but you still (and always) need to provide enough sourcing information so that the license information can be verified. Would you please add the HTML website page that you found the image on? Thanks. If you need more help or have more questions, please ask.  +++$+++ :The problem is that the current source information isn't very specific on where you got the image. Yes that agency is probably a federal government agency, so the image is likely free, but you still (and always) need to provide enough sourcing information so that the license information can be verified. Would you please add the HTML website page that you found the image on? Thanks. If you need more help or have more questions, please ask. [[User:MECU|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:MECU|talk]]</small> 22:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

529198 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-20 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.203547200E09 +++$+++ The sentence should be sourced or else be removed. I don't watch that much television and with most of the movies, television shows, sports, etc. I am not familiar with most of them. Semi-protection of the [[Fond du Lac, Wisconsin]] is in order-this is an edit war going on. Many thanks- +++$+++ The sentence should be sourced or else be removed. I don't watch that much television and with most of the movies, television shows, sports, etc. I am not familiar with most of them. Semi-protection of the [[Fond du Lac, Wisconsin]] is in order-this is an edit war going on. Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
529199 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529198 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.203547620E09 +++$+++ I look at the [[Point Place]] article that this is based upon. The article also claims [[Kenosha, Wisconsin]] as well. There was a tag that the [[Point Place]] article is from mainly one source and needs to be rewritten with more then one source. Therefore, to resolve the Fond du Lac article edit problems, attention has to be given to the Point Place article as well. Incidentally, I never heard of Point Place until now. Thank you- +++$+++ ::I look at the [[Point Place]] article that this is based upon. The article also claims [[Kenosha, Wisconsin]] as well. There was a tag that the [[Point Place]] article is from mainly one source and needs to be rewritten with more then one source. Therefore, to resolve the Fond du Lac article edit problems, attention has to be given to the Point Place article as well. Incidentally, I never heard of Point Place until now. Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
529200 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529198 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.203548580E09 +++$+++ I was glad to help out. The Point Place website mentions the program is based upon [[Green Bay, Wisconsin]] but it could anywhere in Wisconsin. Whoever, put that in in the Fond du Lac article thought it was that city. Many thanks- +++$+++ ::I was glad to help out. The Point Place website mentions the program is based upon [[Green Bay, Wisconsin]] but it could anywhere in Wisconsin. Whoever, put that in in the Fond du Lac article thought it was that city. Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 15:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
529201 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529198 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.203550020E09 +++$+++ I hope my edits to the three articles involved are appropriate. We're in Hollywood's \"Wisconsin\" now; remember the [[Rome, Wisconsin]] of ''[[Picket Fences]]'': the small town with only a couple of lawyers (but its own TV station and big hospital), with the snow-capped mountains visible in the distance? -- +++$+++ :::I hope my edits to the three articles involved are appropriate. We're in Hollywood's "Wisconsin" now; remember the [[Rome, Wisconsin]] of ''[[Picket Fences]]'': the small town with only a couple of lawyers (but its own TV station and big hospital), with the snow-capped mountains visible in the distance? --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  | [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 15:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
529202 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529198 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.203551580E09 +++$+++ One nice thing about Wikipedia is the WikiProject Wisconsin! We help each other out and providing information about Wisconsin. Thank you- +++$+++ :::One nice thing about Wikipedia is the WikiProject Wisconsin! We help each other out and providing information about Wisconsin. Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 15:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

267055 +++$+++ Lotlil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267055 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-27 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.188246360E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I've been working on the article [[Economy of ancient Tamil country]] for a while now. The article recently had a peer-review, where one of the comments was to make the prose flow tighter and fix possible copyedit problems. I tried to fix some of it myself, but an expert hand is really needed now. I request you to help with the prose and other issues in the article, when you get a chance. It would also be great if you could leave your comments about what else is needed to make it an FA. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I've been working on the article [[Economy of ancient Tamil country]] for a while now. The article recently had a peer-review, where one of the comments was to make the prose flow tighter and fix possible copyedit problems. I tried to fix some of it myself, but an expert hand is really needed now. I request you to help with the prose and other issues in the article, when you get a chance. It would also be great if you could leave your comments about what else is needed to make it an FA. Thanks. [[User:Lotlil|Lotlil]] 13:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
267056 +++$+++ Lotlil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267055 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.188267120E09 +++$+++ Matisse, thanks a lot for offering to help. I would like to take this to FAC, so yes please scrutinize it appropriately. I think your time will be best utilised if you could fix any prose and flow issues with the article. I will address any content issues. The peer-review (esp. from User:Taxman) has a few prose suggestions, that would be a good start. Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::Matisse, thanks a lot for offering to help. I would like to take this to FAC, so yes please scrutinize it appropriately. I think your time will be best utilised if you could fix any prose and flow issues with the article. I will address any content issues. The peer-review (esp. from User:Taxman) has a few prose suggestions, that would be a good start. Thanks again. [[User:Lotlil|Lotlil]] 19:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
267057 +++$+++ Lotlil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267055 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.188271320E09 +++$+++ Hi, about the sources section: the intention was to indicate what the ''primary'' sources are. The article itself is sourced from history books and papers written by modern-day scholars, which per [[WP:PSTS]] are reliable secondary sources. These authors, in turn, have used archaeological and epigraphic sources, in addition to the ancient literature to make their claims. I was asked to write a section on such primary sources, in the peer review. Would it help to rename the section as ''Primary sources''?  +++$+++ :::Hi, about the sources section: the intention was to indicate what the ''primary'' sources are. The article itself is sourced from history books and papers written by modern-day scholars, which per [[WP:PSTS]] are reliable secondary sources. These authors, in turn, have used archaeological and epigraphic sources, in addition to the ancient literature to make their claims. I was asked to write a section on such primary sources, in the peer review. Would it help to rename the section as ''Primary sources''? [[User:Lotlil|Lotlil]] 20:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
267058 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267055 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.188272220E09 +++$+++ Don't get distressed at my comments, because if you do go for FAC, it is a grueling and humbling process! (They will be very critical.)  I am not sure what you mean by \"Tamil country\". Is there not a more specific name? Do you mean country as in \"city vs. country\", or do you mean country as in \"nation\". I have not heard that term before. Is that a commonly used term? The link to [[Tamil people]] is not very helpful because it makes Tamil seem multinational, not necessarily related to a specific area of India. Maybe you can straighten me out here. Regards, -- +++$+++ ::::Don't get distressed at my comments, because if you do go for FAC, it is a grueling and humbling process! (They will be very critical.)  I am not sure what you mean by "Tamil country". Is there not a more specific name? Do you mean country as in "city vs. country", or do you mean country as in "nation". I have not heard that term before. Is that a commonly used term? The link to [[Tamil people]] is not very helpful because it makes Tamil seem multinational, not necessarily related to a specific area of India. Maybe you can straighten me out here. Regards, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 20:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

612488 +++$+++ Samsara +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-09 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.165707660E09 +++$+++ Honestly, if you're going to start reverting my changes without comment, you can just do it all yourself. I wasn't happy that the reference conversion was left to me.  +++$+++ Honestly, if you're going to start reverting my changes without comment, you can just do it all yourself. I wasn't happy that the reference conversion was left to me. [[User:Samsara|Samsara]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Samsara|talk]]&nbsp;<small>•</small>&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Samsara|contribs]]) 15:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
612489 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612488 +++$+++ 612488 +++$+++ 2006-12-09 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.165708020E09 +++$+++ Sorry, that seems to have been an edit conflict and I'll try to fix it ASAP. ..  +++$+++ :Sorry, that seems to have been an edit conflict and I'll try to fix it ASAP. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:47, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

267060 +++$+++ Cuchullain +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267060 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-27 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.188275820E09 +++$+++ You obviously don't agree with the rule, per your original additions and your edit summaries. Why don't we discuss on the talk page over there what to do now and in the future?-- +++$+++ You obviously don't agree with the rule, per your original additions and your edit summaries. Why don't we discuss on the talk page over there what to do now and in the future?--[[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 21:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
267061 +++$+++ Cuchullain +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267060 +++$+++ 267060 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.188278520E09 +++$+++ Look, Mattisse, there's nothing \"selective\" about my enforcement on this, and I am not the lone enforcer. It has nothing to do with you, I just happened to notice after you added them that they had less than 1000, I just missed the others (and haven't had time to check on all the ones you pointed out). I'll get to the others when I have time, but right now I'm going to get back to editing articles. But come on, if you have a real problem with the rule, why don't you bring it up over there? If not, I assure you I'll deal with it when I can, but it won't be right now.-- +++$+++ :Look, Mattisse, there's nothing "selective" about my enforcement on this, and I am not the lone enforcer. It has nothing to do with you, I just happened to notice after you added them that they had less than 1000, I just missed the others (and haven't had time to check on all the ones you pointed out). I'll get to the others when I have time, but right now I'm going to get back to editing articles. But come on, if you have a real problem with the rule, why don't you bring it up over there? If not, I assure you I'll deal with it when I can, but it won't be right now.--[[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 22:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
267062 +++$+++ Cuchullain +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267060 +++$+++ 267061 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.188279840E09 +++$+++ Fine. Like I said, I'll get to it when I get to it, but I'm not taking any more time away from editing articles right now. I really am sorry you've been so upset by this, the only reason I edit the page is as a memorial to those who were once an important part of the community but are not any longer. I edit it the way I do because of consensus gathered from the talk page, the AfD, from the others who have maintained the page (some of whom sadly are no longer editing themselves). I didn't have anything to do with giving you the warning, but you were apparently editing out of resentment, and for my part I did try to apologize and explain myself to you. I wish you would reconsider unwatching the page, there is much work to be done, and fewer and fewer people interested in doing it.-- +++$+++ ::Fine. Like I said, I'll get to it when I get to it, but I'm not taking any more time away from editing articles right now. I really am sorry you've been so upset by this, the only reason I edit the page is as a memorial to those who were once an important part of the community but are not any longer. I edit it the way I do because of consensus gathered from the talk page, the AfD, from the others who have maintained the page (some of whom sadly are no longer editing themselves). I didn't have anything to do with giving you the warning, but you were apparently editing out of resentment, and for my part I did try to apologize and explain myself to you. I wish you would reconsider unwatching the page, there is much work to be done, and fewer and fewer people interested in doing it.--[[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 22:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
267063 +++$+++ Cuchullain +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267060 +++$+++ 267062 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.188296340E09 +++$+++ I didn't treat you any way at all, except to revert your first addition, and then attempt to explain why. Nor did I \"support bullying\" by not jumping up and editing as fast as you would have liked, I have other things to do, on and off Wikipedia. I suggest you not take things quite so personally, particularly if you're not going to discuss it on the dedicated talk page But your right, this conversation is over.-- +++$+++ :::I didn't treat you any way at all, except to revert your first addition, and then attempt to explain why. Nor did I "support bullying" by not jumping up and editing as fast as you would have liked, I have other things to do, on and off Wikipedia. I suggest you not take things quite so personally, particularly if you're not going to discuss it on the dedicated talk page But your right, this conversation is over.--[[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 03:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
267064 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267060 +++$+++ 267063 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.188296640E09 +++$+++ They call the guy Last Word [[User:Cuchullain|C\xfachullain]] I've heard.  -- +++$+++ ::::They call the guy Last Word [[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] I've heard.  --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 03:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
267065 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267060 +++$+++ 267060 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.188293820E09 +++$+++ Well, [[User:Allgoodnamesalreadytaken|Allgoodnamesalreadytaken]], put a case together if you think so. -- +++$+++ :Well, [[User:Allgoodnamesalreadytaken|Allgoodnamesalreadytaken]], put a case together if you think so. --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 02:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

529206 +++$+++ Twelsht +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-22 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.203732840E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, That sounds great! I'm stepping out right now, but I'll get to it when I return in a few hours. Cheers, --  +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, That sounds great! I'm stepping out right now, but I'll get to it when I return in a few hours. Cheers, -- [[User:Twelsht|twelsht]] ([[User talk:Twelsht|talk]]) 18:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
529207 +++$+++ Twelsht +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529206 +++$+++ 529206 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.203768900E09 +++$+++ For now, I made a few minor edits, some of which (as it turned out) echoed comments in the archived PR. The piece seems quite comprehensive, but it could benefit from the introduction of a \"Personal life\" section. It sounds as though Kulwicki was absorbed by his work and had few close friends. Still, information about his relationship with family members, etc., would help to humanize him. Given that Kulwicki was widely identified as Polish American, I was surprised that there were few references to his ethnic background in the article.  Perhaps you should at least mention that his parents (or one of them) were of Polish origin. I will be away from the computer for a couple days because of an unforeseen development. But I'll be more than happy to write a review on Monday. Cheers, --  +++$+++ :For now, I made a few minor edits, some of which (as it turned out) echoed comments in the archived PR. The piece seems quite comprehensive, but it could benefit from the introduction of a "Personal life" section. It sounds as though Kulwicki was absorbed by his work and had few close friends. Still, information about his relationship with family members, etc., would help to humanize him. Given that Kulwicki was widely identified as Polish American, I was surprised that there were few references to his ethnic background in the article.  Perhaps you should at least mention that his parents (or one of them) were of Polish origin. I will be away from the computer for a couple days because of an unforeseen development. But I'll be more than happy to write a review on Monday. Cheers, -- [[User:Twelsht|twelsht]] ([[User talk:Twelsht|talk]]) 04:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
529208 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529206 +++$+++ 529207 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.203842700E09 +++$+++ Kulwicki greatly changed NASCAR - it used to be a family sport and now it extremely businesslike with long days and living to work (vs. working to live). I wouldn't say that he was widely known as a Polish American, but it only came up at times during life, like the article conveys. I added that his city was known as a Polish American city. I don't know about Kulwicki's father heritage and stated that we was buried in his mother's family plot like other Polish Americans.  +++$+++ ::Kulwicki greatly changed NASCAR - it used to be a family sport and now it extremely businesslike with long days and living to work (vs. working to live). I wouldn't say that he was widely known as a Polish American, but it only came up at times during life, like the article conveys. I added that his city was known as a Polish American city. I don't know about Kulwicki's father heritage and stated that we was buried in his mother's family plot like other Polish Americans. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 00:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
529209 +++$+++ Twelsht +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529206 +++$+++ 529208 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.204244940E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, Thanks for your comments on [[Jack Warner]]!  I haven't had a chance to look at them closely, but all of them appeared to be constructive and actionable. As you suggested, it may be possible to locate a free use image of Warner as a studio exec, given that his career traces back to 1918. I'll act on your recommendations this evening. For now, I printed up a copy of [[Alan Kulwicki]] (it's easier for me to review the hard copy of an article). I'll be ready with some comments later today. Cheers, --  +++$+++ :::Hi Royalbroil, Thanks for your comments on [[Jack Warner]]!  I haven't had a chance to look at them closely, but all of them appeared to be constructive and actionable. As you suggested, it may be possible to locate a free use image of Warner as a studio exec, given that his career traces back to 1918. I'll act on your recommendations this evening. For now, I printed up a copy of [[Alan Kulwicki]] (it's easier for me to review the hard copy of an article). I'll be ready with some comments later today. Cheers, -- [[User:Twelsht|twelsht]] ([[User talk:Twelsht|talk]]) 16:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

529211 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-24 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.203874440E09 +++$+++ Yep - but it'll probably be Monday as I'm busy today. Will leave my comments here. Cheers.  +++$+++ Yep - but it'll probably be Monday as I'm busy today. Will leave my comments here. Cheers. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] ([[User talk:4u1e|talk]]) 09:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
529212 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529211 +++$+++ 529211 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.203989340E09 +++$+++ Is there a designated 'Polish-American' section of the cemetary? If so, how about:\"Kulwicki was buried in the family plot in the Polish-American area of the Saint Adalbert Cemetery in Milwaukee.\" If there is not a designated area, how about: \"Kulwicki was buried in the family plot at the Saint Adalbert Cemetery in Milwaukee, in an area where there are many Polish-American graves.\" The latter is a bit clumsy, and also requires you have a source for the fact that the other graves are Polish-American. How does one identify a Polish-American grave? I'll come back to this later, but let me know what you think of those two.  +++$+++ :Is there a designated 'Polish-American' section of the cemetary? If so, how about:"Kulwicki was buried in the family plot in the Polish-American area of the Saint Adalbert Cemetery in Milwaukee." If there is not a designated area, how about: "Kulwicki was buried in the family plot at the Saint Adalbert Cemetery in Milwaukee, in an area where there are many Polish-American graves." The latter is a bit clumsy, and also requires you have a source for the fact that the other graves are Polish-American. How does one identify a Polish-American grave? I'll come back to this later, but let me know what you think of those two. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] ([[User talk:4u1e|talk]]) 17:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
529213 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529211 +++$+++ 529211 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.204017120E09 +++$+++ I like the second option better. It didn't appear to be an official Polish-American section, but the section was different. The rest of the cemetery has one stone to mark the person that's buried there. Several stones in that Polish American section had the name of the family written in large letters on a large stone, with the family member's names written in small letters along the base of the stone. [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/royal_broil\/2157750157\/ Here's] the full picture of the family gravestone. Do you think that this topic is important enough to spend time on? I don't think it's worth much time.  +++$+++ :I like the second option better. It didn't appear to be an official Polish-American section, but the section was different. The rest of the cemetery has one stone to mark the person that's buried there. Several stones in that Polish American section had the name of the family written in large letters on a large stone, with the family member's names written in small letters along the base of the stone. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/royal_broil/2157750157/ Here's] the full picture of the family gravestone. Do you think that this topic is important enough to spend time on? I don't think it's worth much time. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 01:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

612490 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-10 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.165756680E09 +++$+++ Dear Dave\u2014you may be interested in putting your name to, or at least commenting on [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#A_new_parallel_syntax_for_autoformatting_dates|this new push]] to get the developers to create a parallel syntax that separates autoformatting and linking functions. IMV, it would go a long way towards fixing the untidy blueing of trivial chronological items, and would probably calm the nastiness between the anti- and pro-linking factions in the project. The proposal is to retain the existing function, to reduce the risk of objection from pro-linkers.  +++$+++ Dear Dave—you may be interested in putting your name to, or at least commenting on [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#A_new_parallel_syntax_for_autoformatting_dates|this new push]] to get the developers to create a parallel syntax that separates autoformatting and linking functions. IMV, it would go a long way towards fixing the untidy blueing of trivial chronological items, and would probably calm the nastiness between the anti- and pro-linking factions in the project. The proposal is to retain the existing function, to reduce the risk of objection from pro-linkers. [[User:Tony1|Tony]] 05:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
612491 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612490 +++$+++ 612490 +++$+++ 2006-12-11 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.165859400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up, that was easier than expected. Sorry so slow, things have been hectic of late. So \"at the coo's tail\" as usual, ..  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up, that was easier than expected. Sorry so slow, things have been hectic of late. So "at the coo's tail" as usual, .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

267070 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-28 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.188342180E09 +++$+++ Greetings,<br>I'm writing this post to you to request your feedback and suggestions for improvement\/expansion of the [[Trade route]] article.<br>I edited [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Trade_route&oldid=148107910 this version of the article] to the present state and am currently exhausted and out of ideas to edit the article any further. Any help would be greatly appreciated.  +++$+++ Greetings,<br>I'm writing this post to you to request your feedback and suggestions for improvement/expansion of the [[Trade route]] article.<br>I edited [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trade_route&oldid=148107910 this version of the article] to the present state and am currently exhausted and out of ideas to edit the article any further. Any help would be greatly appreciated. [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelock the Dane</font>]] 16:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
267071 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267070 +++$+++ 267070 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.188343920E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the reply. As for the first sentence, I just improvised on the already existing intro [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Trade_route&oldid=148107910 \"A trade route is the sequence of pathways and stopping places used for the commercial transport of cargo. Trade routes can be land or water-based.\"] As for specific goals, Right now I have none. I'm out of ideas and would appreciate newer suggestions and your vision of how the article should be expanded. Is the inclusion of air routes and cargo flights possible? With Regards,  +++$+++ :Thank you for the reply. As for the first sentence, I just improvised on the already existing intro [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trade_route&oldid=148107910 "A trade route is the sequence of pathways and stopping places used for the commercial transport of cargo. Trade routes can be land or water-based."] As for specific goals, Right now I have none. I'm out of ideas and would appreciate newer suggestions and your vision of how the article should be expanded. Is the inclusion of air routes and cargo flights possible? With Regards, [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelock the Dane</font>]] 16:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
267072 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267070 +++$+++ 267071 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.188350040E09 +++$+++ Restored old intro,  +++$+++ ::Restored old intro, [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelock the Dane</font>]] 18:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
267073 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267070 +++$+++ 267072 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.188358200E09 +++$+++ With regards,  +++$+++ :::With regards, [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelock the Dane</font>]] 20:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
267074 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267070 +++$+++ 267073 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.188358920E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I'll try to work on the template ASAP.  +++$+++ ::::Thank you, I'll try to work on the template ASAP. [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelock the Dane</font>]] 20:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
267075 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267070 +++$+++ 267071 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.188360960E09 +++$+++ Both the articles look great and I have found my points regarding Chinese economy [[Economy of the Song Dynasty|here]]. Thanks for pointing the articles out,  +++$+++ ::Both the articles look great and I have found my points regarding Chinese economy [[Economy of the Song Dynasty|here]]. Thanks for pointing the articles out, [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelock the Dane</font>]] 21:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
267076 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267070 +++$+++ 267070 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.188362460E09 +++$+++ User:PericlesofAthens has some great stuff, I even looked up his account of Wikimedia commons and he has done well there. The China related articles are both well written and informative. I am in the process of collecting some info for writing about the economy of China right now. I did'nt know they used paper money before most countries!  +++$+++ :User:PericlesofAthens has some great stuff, I even looked up his account of Wikimedia commons and he has done well there. The China related articles are both well written and informative. I am in the process of collecting some info for writing about the economy of China right now. I did'nt know they used paper money before most countries! [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelock the Dane</font>]] 21:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
267077 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267070 +++$+++ 267076 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.188367380E09 +++$+++ [[Template:Trade_route|Made the template]] and [[History of international trade|updated the article]]. I found an excellent image of one of the first banknotes in history in the articles that you suggested and found three points regarding the [[Song Dynasty]] which I incorporated in the expansion. Thanks and Regards,  +++$+++ ::[[Template:Trade_route|Made the template]] and [[History of international trade|updated the article]]. I found an excellent image of one of the first banknotes in history in the articles that you suggested and found three points regarding the [[Song Dynasty]] which I incorporated in the expansion. Thanks and Regards, [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelock the Dane</font>]] 23:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

529216 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529216 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-25 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.203992640E09 +++$+++ I've finished commenting on [[Jack Warner]], if you want to get stuck in. Alternatively you might want to wait until Twelsht has addressed or rejected my comments! Cheers.  +++$+++ I've finished commenting on [[Jack Warner]], if you want to get stuck in. Alternatively you might want to wait until Twelsht has addressed or rejected my comments! Cheers. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] ([[User talk:4u1e|talk]]) 18:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
529217 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529216 +++$+++ 529216 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.204016700E09 +++$+++ I'll wait until your comments are addressed before I review, so hopefully I will be notified.  +++$+++ :I'll wait until your comments are addressed before I review, so hopefully I will be notified. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 01:05, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
529218 +++$+++ Twelsht +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529216 +++$+++ 529217 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.204030260E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, I just returned to my computer (a bit later than anticipated) and began to address 4ule's comments. When I'm finished, I'll let you know, and I'll move right on to the Kulwicki article. Cheers, --  +++$+++ ::Hi Royalbroil, I just returned to my computer (a bit later than anticipated) and began to address 4ule's comments. When I'm finished, I'll let you know, and I'll move right on to the Kulwicki article. Cheers, -- [[User:Twelsht|twelsht]] ([[User talk:Twelsht|talk]]) 04:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
529219 +++$+++ Twelsht +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529216 +++$+++ 529218 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.204196940E09 +++$+++ I just finished addressing 4ule's comments on [[Jack Warner]] and will move on [[Alan Kulwicki]] tommorrow. Cheers, --  +++$+++ :::I just finished addressing 4ule's comments on [[Jack Warner]] and will move on [[Alan Kulwicki]] tommorrow. Cheers, -- [[User:Twelsht|twelsht]] ([[User talk:Twelsht|talk]]) 03:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
529220 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529216 +++$+++ 529219 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.204197240E09 +++$+++ I've finished most of the peer review comments to the Kulwicki article. I'll probably be done by the time you read this. I'll review Jack Wagner's article when I get done with implementing these peer review comments on Kulwicki's article.  +++$+++ ::::I've finished most of the peer review comments to the Kulwicki article. I'll probably be done by the time you read this. I'll review Jack Wagner's article when I get done with implementing these peer review comments on Kulwicki's article. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 03:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

525110 +++$+++ Mauvila +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525110 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-10 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.157878440E09 +++$+++ Are you one of the Wikigods who can move articles to those that have more than a redirect?  If so, could you move [[portal vein]] to [[hepatic portal vein]] so the concept of a portal vein can be addressed separately from its main instance?  If you aren't one of these Wikigods, do you know any?  +++$+++ Are you one of the Wikigods who can move articles to those that have more than a redirect?  If so, could you move [[portal vein]] to [[hepatic portal vein]] so the concept of a portal vein can be addressed separately from its main instance?  If you aren't one of these Wikigods, do you know any? [[User:Mauvila|Mauvila]] 01:54, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
525111 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525110 +++$+++ 525110 +++$+++ 2006-09-10 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.157890680E09 +++$+++ Moved. -- +++$+++ :Moved. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 05:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

267078 +++$+++ Lotlil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267078 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-28 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.188360780E09 +++$+++ I don't know how my comment came across, but I wasn't trying to be protective of my edits or something like that. If anything I can see the article starting to take a reasonable shape after you started working on it. Anyways, you've pointed out enough holes that I think will keep be busy for the next few days :-) Much appreciate your time.  +++$+++ I don't know how my comment came across, but I wasn't trying to be protective of my edits or something like that. If anything I can see the article starting to take a reasonable shape after you started working on it. Anyways, you've pointed out enough holes that I think will keep be busy for the next few days :-) Much appreciate your time. [[User:Lotlil|Lotlil]] 21:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
267079 +++$+++ Lotlil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267078 +++$+++ 267078 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.188362280E09 +++$+++ Oh, I didn't realize there was a requirement about using ndashes in footnotes. I remember reading that section in WP:MoS, but I missed this point. Will fix it, thanks.  +++$+++ :Oh, I didn't realize there was a requirement about using ndashes in footnotes. I remember reading that section in WP:MoS, but I missed this point. Will fix it, thanks. [[User:Lotlil|Lotlil]] 21:38, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

267081 +++$+++ Anetode +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-28 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.188369840E09 +++$+++ While I disagree with the assertion that it was an indiscriminate blanking, your point is taken. Next time I will add a note on the article talk page explaining any removal (outside of routine CSD deletions). Cheers, \u02c9\u02c9<sup> +++$+++ While I disagree with the assertion that it was an indiscriminate blanking, your point is taken. Next time I will add a note on the article talk page explaining any removal (outside of routine CSD deletions). Cheers, ˉˉ<sup>[[User:Anetode|'''anetode''']]</sup>[[User_talk:Anetode|╦╩]] 23:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
267082 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267081 +++$+++ 267081 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.188373320E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  -- +++$+++ :Thank you.  --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 00:42, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

267083 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267083 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-29 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.188377820E09 +++$+++ Please go right ahead. If there is ''any'' way in which I can be of help let me know. I'll expand the template mentioning the cities etc. along the trade routes in the near future  and do a better job at aligning it in articles. I'll also add more trade route sections to the main [[trade route]] article ASAP.<br>With regards,  +++$+++ Please go right ahead. If there is ''any'' way in which I can be of help let me know. I'll expand the template mentioning the cities etc. along the trade routes in the near future  and do a better job at aligning it in articles. I'll also add more trade route sections to the main [[trade route]] article ASAP.<br>With regards, [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelock the Dane</font>]] 01:57, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
267084 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267083 +++$+++ 267083 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.188448200E09 +++$+++ Done, and made [[Template:Trade route 2|another template]],  +++$+++ :Done, and made [[Template:Trade route 2|another template]], [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelock the Dane</font>]] 21:30, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

529230 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-27 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.204164360E09 +++$+++ You did an excellent job with the Alan Kulwicki article. It was well written and very interesting. Thanks- +++$+++ You did an excellent job with the Alan Kulwicki article. It was well written and very interesting. Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 18:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
529231 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529230 +++$+++ 529230 +++$+++ 2008-02-27 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.204164780E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict)Thanks! I thank the main eyes that have peer reviewed the article, whether or not their review resulted in many changes. It's close to a GA nomination and hopefully FA shortly down the road.  +++$+++ :(edit conflict)Thanks! I thank the main eyes that have peer reviewed the article, whether or not their review resulted in many changes. It's close to a GA nomination and hopefully FA shortly down the road. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 18:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
529232 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529230 +++$+++ 529231 +++$+++ 2008-02-27 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.204164480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking User:Garystaff23 under your wing.- +++$+++ ::Thanks for taking User:Garystaff23 under your wing.-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 18:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
529233 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529230 +++$+++ 529232 +++$+++ 2008-02-27 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.204164780E09 +++$+++ I hope that he reads my comments and takes them to heart.  +++$+++ :::I hope that he reads my comments and takes them to heart. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 18:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

267087 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-30 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.188526620E09 +++$+++ I came up with [[User:Havelock the Dane\/Sandbox|these two]] in a hurry. I had to spend most of today preparing for a short trip that I have to take tomorrow so it was'nt much. I found that inserting an image in a footer infobox is a lot harder than manipulating it in an ordinary one, especially when the image in question deals with a trade route (mostly maps or photos of routes). Take a look, I can edit for better colors etc. when I return. I checked the image (in the second template) on Firefox and IE and found out that it fits nicely given the default IE config.<br>With Regards,<br> +++$+++ I came up with [[User:Havelock the Dane/Sandbox|these two]] in a hurry. I had to spend most of today preparing for a short trip that I have to take tomorrow so it was'nt much. I found that inserting an image in a footer infobox is a lot harder than manipulating it in an ordinary one, especially when the image in question deals with a trade route (mostly maps or photos of routes). Take a look, I can edit for better colors etc. when I return. I checked the image (in the second template) on Firefox and IE and found out that it fits nicely given the default IE config.<br>With Regards,<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelock the Dane</font>]] 19:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
267088 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267087 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.188527640E09 +++$+++ Thankfully, abundant material is available for referencing and the article has a good enough structure but needs lots of cited info and verifiable facts.<br>Regards,  +++$+++ ::Thankfully, abundant material is available for referencing and the article has a good enough structure but needs lots of cited info and verifiable facts.<br>Regards, [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelock the Dane</font>]] 19:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

4944 +++$+++ Ukexpat +++$+++ A. Carty +++$+++ 4944 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-01 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.291243740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your edits, but please remember to use [[WP:ES|edit summaries]]. Thank you.&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp; +++$+++ Thanks for your edits, but please remember to use [[WP:ES|edit summaries]]. Thank you.&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 14:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
4945 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ A. Carty +++$+++ 4944 +++$+++ 4944 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.296215520E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing![[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  03:52, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

267090 +++$+++ Wwoods +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-31 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.188555120E09 +++$+++ <br\/> +++$+++ <br/>[[User:Wwoods|—wwoods]] 03:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
267091 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267090 +++$+++ 267090 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.188587100E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I found the article  [[Hibakusha]] in the need to be  Wikify bin and just fixed up the article enough to get it out of there and removed the tag. Any information I added I got from the referenced citations with I see I added (from your diff).  Other than that, I am no expert on the subject and I don't know the Japanese language so I am not much good at helping you out with your question. You are probably right, as I just don't know. Regards,  +++$+++ :Sorry, I found the article  [[Hibakusha]] in the need to be  Wikify bin and just fixed up the article enough to get it out of there and removed the tag. Any information I added I got from the referenced citations with I see I added (from your diff).  Other than that, I am no expert on the subject and I don't know the Japanese language so I am not much good at helping you out with your question. You are probably right, as I just don't know. Regards, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 12:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

568803 +++$+++ DelosHarriman +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-04 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.157414220E09 +++$+++ Please help.  Anon user 68.51.8.88 has just violated 3rr on the article entitled TheVanguard.Org.  In the process, he has also removed a valid citation to an outside source regarding the erroneous point he's pushing and ignored repeated attempts by numerous users to point that out.  He's the same anonymous user who was also the main antagonist against the Rod D. Martin article (Martin being the group's chairman), which situation you resolved.  Your help would be most appreciated:  I cannot revert again without violating 3rr myself.   +++$+++ Please help.  Anon user 68.51.8.88 has just violated 3rr on the article entitled TheVanguard.Org.  In the process, he has also removed a valid citation to an outside source regarding the erroneous point he's pushing and ignored repeated attempts by numerous users to point that out.  He's the same anonymous user who was also the main antagonist against the Rod D. Martin article (Martin being the group's chairman), which situation you resolved.  Your help would be most appreciated:  I cannot revert again without violating 3rr myself.  [[User:DelosHarriman|DelosHarriman]] 16:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
568804 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568803 +++$+++ 568803 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.157430240E09 +++$+++ Hello! Were you aware that you can report [[WP:3RR]] violations at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/3RR]], rather than posting to an individual admin's Talk page? It is better to post there rather than anywhere else in case I or another admin miss the posting or are away from our computers for the evening. <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Hello! Were you aware that you can report [[WP:3RR]] violations at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR]], rather than posting to an individual admin's Talk page? It is better to post there rather than anywhere else in case I or another admin miss the posting or are away from our computers for the evening. <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''(aeropa'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''gitica)'''</font>]]</span> 21:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

4949 +++$+++ Vanadus +++$+++ Struway2 +++$+++ 4949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312004160E09 +++$+++ Hello, I think the [[MOS:NDASH]] refers to the grammatically correct use of it in a sentence or phrase rather than in strictly a display format such as in [[template:footballbox]] and [[template:footballbox collapsible]]. Major football articles that use those templates, like [[2010_FIFA_World_Cup_Final#Details|2010 FIFA World Cup Final]], [[2010\u201311_UEFA_Champions_League_knockout_phase#First_leg|2010\u201311 UEFA Champions League knockout phase]], and [[2010\u201311 FC Barcelona season#Knockout phase|2010\u201311 FC Barcelona season]], all use the spaces around the endash so I think it would only make sense to follow this implied convention. What do you think?  +++$+++ Hello, I think the [[MOS:NDASH]] refers to the grammatically correct use of it in a sentence or phrase rather than in strictly a display format such as in [[template:footballbox]] and [[template:footballbox collapsible]]. Major football articles that use those templates, like [[2010_FIFA_World_Cup_Final#Details|2010 FIFA World Cup Final]], [[2010–11_UEFA_Champions_League_knockout_phase#First_leg|2010–11 UEFA Champions League knockout phase]], and [[2010–11 FC Barcelona season#Knockout phase|2010–11 FC Barcelona season]], all use the spaces around the endash so I think it would only make sense to follow this implied convention. What do you think? [[User:Vanadus|Vanadus]] ([[User talk:Vanadus|talk]]) 22:36, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
4950 +++$+++ Vanadus +++$+++ Struway2 +++$+++ 4949 +++$+++ 4949 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312259040E09 +++$+++ That's a very interesting discussion you bring up. It makes me wonder why [[WP:FOOTY]] proceeded to ignore the possible MoS violation after it was identified.  +++$+++ :That's a very interesting discussion you bring up. It makes me wonder why [[WP:FOOTY]] proceeded to ignore the possible MoS violation after it was identified. [[User:Vanadus|Vanadus]] ([[User talk:Vanadus|talk]]) 21:24, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

267095 +++$+++ PalaceGuard008 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267095 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-02 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.188741780E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to thank you for creating that article! Been waiting for a while for it -- and now there's something to link to from [[Caisson (Asian architecture)]] and [[Forbidden City]] and all the rest. -- +++$+++ Just wanted to thank you for creating that article! Been waiting for a while for it -- and now there's something to link to from [[Caisson (Asian architecture)]] and [[Forbidden City]] and all the rest. --[[User:PalaceGuard008|PalaceGuard008]] ([[User_Talk:PalaceGuard008|Talk]]) 07:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
267096 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267095 +++$+++ 267095 +++$+++ 2007-09-02 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.188770160E09 +++$+++ I found your article [[Caisson (Asian architecture)]] interesting also. I like to try to understand the details of architecture. It's hard to find information on Chinese architecture -- at least for me.  -- +++$+++ :I found your article [[Caisson (Asian architecture)]] interesting also. I like to try to understand the details of architecture. It's hard to find information on Chinese architecture -- at least for me.  --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 14:56, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

529240 +++$+++ UWMSports +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-28 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.204198020E09 +++$+++ Well, lets see what happens over the next week or so. If I'm proven wrong then I will tip my hat to you guys. Both pages have been around way over a year though, but hopefully something can be done with them. - +++$+++ Well, lets see what happens over the next week or so. If I'm proven wrong then I will tip my hat to you guys. Both pages have been around way over a year though, but hopefully something can be done with them. -[[User:UWMSports|UWMSports]] ([[User talk:UWMSports|talk]]) 03:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
529241 +++$+++ UWMSports +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529240 +++$+++ 529240 +++$+++ 2008-03-04 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.204679580E09 +++$+++ I apologize if it wasn't written clearly. But to say it doesn't look any less than an advertisement than something else falls under [[WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS]]. However, no decision was reached on its suggested deletion. I say we merge the article without getting everyone involved again if no one upgrades the article from its current state the next few days. - +++$+++ :I apologize if it wasn't written clearly. But to say it doesn't look any less than an advertisement than something else falls under [[WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS]]. However, no decision was reached on its suggested deletion. I say we merge the article without getting everyone involved again if no one upgrades the article from its current state the next few days. -[[User:UWMSports|UWMSports]] ([[User talk:UWMSports|talk]]) 17:13, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

267097 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-02 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.188792300E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. I like the Bao'en Temple article you've created. However, I don't understand why you put [[:Image:Freer 024.jpg]] in the article; it's a beautiful painting, a picture I took from the [[Freer Gallery of Art]], but it isn't related to the temple at all.--<strong> +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. I like the Bao'en Temple article you've created. However, I don't understand why you put [[:Image:Freer 024.jpg]] in the article; it's a beautiful painting, a picture I took from the [[Freer Gallery of Art]], but it isn't related to the temple at all.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 21:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
267098 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267097 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-02 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.188793020E09 +++$+++ Well, unfortunately the only \"Bao'en Temple\" picture I know of on wikipedia or commons is the [[Beisi Pagoda]] picture, but that belongs to the Bao'en Temple of Jiangsu province, not Sichuan province. I've seen the pagoda at the Sichuan Bao'en Temple, it's nice, but there is no free picture of it on the web, not even fair use.--<strong> +++$+++ ::Well, unfortunately the only "Bao'en Temple" picture I know of on wikipedia or commons is the [[Beisi Pagoda]] picture, but that belongs to the Bao'en Temple of Jiangsu province, not Sichuan province. I've seen the pagoda at the Sichuan Bao'en Temple, it's nice, but there is no free picture of it on the web, not even fair use.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 21:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
267099 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267097 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.188805860E09 +++$+++ No, no, no! I've never been to China, I've only seen a picture of it. The only places I've traveled abroad to are Germany, Romania, Mexico, and the Caymen Islands.--<strong> +++$+++ :::No, no, no! I've never been to China, I've only seen a picture of it. The only places I've traveled abroad to are Germany, Romania, Mexico, and the Caymen Islands.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 00:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
267100 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267097 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.188877680E09 +++$+++ Great job on [[Youguo Temple]]! Please, by all means, feel free to incorporate much of the new info into the [[Iron Pagoda]] article, since it is rather short.--<strong> +++$+++ ::::Great job on [[Youguo Temple]]! Please, by all means, feel free to incorporate much of the new info into the [[Iron Pagoda]] article, since it is rather short.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 20:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

529242 +++$+++ SportsMasterESPN +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-28 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.204185600E09 +++$+++ Royalbroil, I did not intend to remove your additional commentary. That was a misake on my part. My appologies. -- +++$+++ Royalbroil, I did not intend to remove your additional commentary. That was a misake on my part. My appologies. --[[User:SportsMasterESPN|Josh]] ([[User talk:SportsMasterESPN|talk]]) 00:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
529243 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529242 +++$+++ 529242 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.204189680E09 +++$+++ Apology accepted. Accidents happen - we're cool.  +++$+++ :Apology accepted. Accidents happen - we're cool. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 01:08, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

529244 +++$+++ Julia Rossi +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-28 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.204264380E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, I can't seem to find a hook I entered in DYK Feb 24, it's about the novel [[The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo]], along with suggestions from other eds. Can you find what happened to it, please?  +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, I can't seem to find a hook I entered in DYK Feb 24, it's about the novel [[The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo]], along with suggestions from other eds. Can you find what happened to it, please? [[User:Julia Rossi|Julia Rossi]] ([[User talk:Julia Rossi|talk]]) 21:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
529245 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529244 +++$+++ 529244 +++$+++ 2008-02-29 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.204281420E09 +++$+++ It got loaded into the [[T:DYK\/N|Next update]], where articles are staged before hitting the main page. It just got loaded on the main page and you should be notified shortly.  +++$+++ :It got loaded into the [[T:DYK/N|Next update]], where articles are staged before hitting the main page. It just got loaded on the main page and you should be notified shortly. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 02:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
529246 +++$+++ Julia Rossi +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529244 +++$+++ 529245 +++$+++ 2008-02-29 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.204282920E09 +++$+++ Thanks, didn't realise they vanished into recycling. Nice to have it accepted too. Also thanks for the tip about Frank's pic \u2013 some anon was being silly and I was being silly back. Took it out anyway, cheers  +++$+++ ::Thanks, didn't realise they vanished into recycling. Nice to have it accepted too. Also thanks for the tip about Frank's pic – some anon was being silly and I was being silly back. Took it out anyway, cheers [[User:Julia Rossi|Julia Rossi]] ([[User talk:Julia Rossi|talk]]) 03:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

267102 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-06 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.189062300E09 +++$+++ Personally, I would go with \"category:History of Chinese architecture\", but that's just me.--<strong> +++$+++ Personally, I would go with "category:History of Chinese architecture", but that's just me.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 00:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
267103 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267102 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-06 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.189064340E09 +++$+++ You're right, there probably are too many categories that start with \"History of...\"--<strong> +++$+++ ::You're right, there probably are too many categories that start with "History of..."--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 00:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
267104 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267102 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-06 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.189064700E09 +++$+++ I don't have the slightest clue.--<strong> +++$+++ :::I don't have the slightest clue.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 00:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

529247 +++$+++ Julia Rossi +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-29 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.204283640E09 +++$+++ There's a person I want to write a biography about but she refuses to disclose her age in interviews. Though she's notable in Australia at least, she's still living. Is not having a birthdate a problem, or is there an acceptable way around it?  +++$+++ There's a person I want to write a biography about but she refuses to disclose her age in interviews. Though she's notable in Australia at least, she's still living. Is not having a birthdate a problem, or is there an acceptable way around it? [[User:Julia Rossi|Julia Rossi]] ([[User talk:Julia Rossi|talk]]) 03:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
529248 +++$+++ Julia Rossi +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529247 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-29 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.204297380E09 +++$+++ Aha, thanks RB : ) no barrier then, away we go...  +++$+++ ::Aha, thanks RB : ) no barrier then, away we go... [[User:Julia Rossi|Julia Rossi]] ([[User talk:Julia Rossi|talk]]) 07:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

4961 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4961 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-17 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.150611660E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I was recently following up some wikilinks I made between Tolkien and Andrew Lang's Blue Fairy Book, and I came across [[Andrew Lang's Fairy Books]] and all the redirects you'd made and material you had added. I'm very impressed by this, and I know a lot more now than I did previously about Andrew Lang's work with fairy stories. Tolkien was a friend of [[Roger Lancelyn Green]], who dedicated one of his books ('The Tale of Troy') to his \"favorite authors\": [[Andrew Lang]] and [[H. Rider Haggard]] who co-wrote [[The World's Desire]] (a retelling of the Troy story I thought, though the article suggests I am wrong on this). Tolkien also wrote a letter asking for Green's expert opinion on early collections of fairy-stories, and I presume Tolkien must have been much aware of Lang's work and books, as well as delivering the 1939 [[Andrew Lang lecture]]. I also followed up the \"See also\" links at the bottom of [[East of the Sun and West of the Moon]], and was very gratified to see Tolkien mentioned at [[Black Bull of Norroway]], which, as the article said, he mentioned in his essay [[On Fairy-Stories]]. Do you think it is worth adding more links in the right places between the Andrew Lang material and Tolkien's essay?  +++$+++ Hi there. I was recently following up some wikilinks I made between Tolkien and Andrew Lang's Blue Fairy Book, and I came across [[Andrew Lang's Fairy Books]] and all the redirects you'd made and material you had added. I'm very impressed by this, and I know a lot more now than I did previously about Andrew Lang's work with fairy stories. Tolkien was a friend of [[Roger Lancelyn Green]], who dedicated one of his books ('The Tale of Troy') to his "favorite authors": [[Andrew Lang]] and [[H. Rider Haggard]] who co-wrote [[The World's Desire]] (a retelling of the Troy story I thought, though the article suggests I am wrong on this). Tolkien also wrote a letter asking for Green's expert opinion on early collections of fairy-stories, and I presume Tolkien must have been much aware of Lang's work and books, as well as delivering the 1939 [[Andrew Lang lecture]]. I also followed up the "See also" links at the bottom of [[East of the Sun and West of the Moon]], and was very gratified to see Tolkien mentioned at [[Black Bull of Norroway]], which, as the article said, he mentioned in his essay [[On Fairy-Stories]]. Do you think it is worth adding more links in the right places between the Andrew Lang material and Tolkien's essay? [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 23:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
4962 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4961 +++$+++ 4961 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.150615260E09 +++$+++ Tolkien certainly knew about Lang's books; in \"On Fairy Tales\" he describes them in several places.  I think it would be quite interesting to add more links -- though I myself am still working on the fairy stories.   +++$+++ :Tolkien certainly knew about Lang's books; in "On Fairy Tales" he describes them in several places.  I think it would be quite interesting to add more links -- though I myself am still working on the fairy stories.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 00:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
4963 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4961 +++$+++ 4962 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.150620840E09 +++$+++ Though I will note that the Andrew Lang books ''were'' indeed children's books.  That's part of Tolkien's complaints about them.   +++$+++ ::Though I will note that the Andrew Lang books ''were'' indeed children's books.  That's part of Tolkien's complaints about them.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 01:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
4964 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4961 +++$+++ 4963 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.150685940E09 +++$+++ Oh. Sorry about that. Do you agree that the article is no longer a stub, though? Maybe the \"children's books\" aspect can be covered by placing the article in an appropriate category? (As I've now done).  +++$+++ :::Oh. Sorry about that. Do you agree that the article is no longer a stub, though? Maybe the "children's books" aspect can be covered by placing the article in an appropriate category? (As I've now done). [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 19:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
4965 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4961 +++$+++ 4964 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.150693680E09 +++$+++ Sure.  (Me, I'm still trying to master the arcane differences between stubs and non-stubs.  Or perhaps, the arcane differences between what gets tagged as stubs, and what doesn't. 0:)  +++$+++ ::::Sure.  (Me, I'm still trying to master the arcane differences between stubs and non-stubs.  Or perhaps, the arcane differences between what gets tagged as stubs, and what doesn't. 0:) [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 22:08, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

529250 +++$+++ D-Day +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-03 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.204603320E09 +++$+++ Go right ahead and send it in! Thanks so much! -- +++$+++ Go right ahead and send it in! Thanks so much! --[[User:D-Day|D-Day]] ([[User talk:D-Day|talk]]) 20:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
529251 +++$+++ D-Day +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529250 +++$+++ 529250 +++$+++ 2008-03-04 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.204687920E09 +++$+++ OK, I just accepted. (Didn't see it the first time). Go ahead and start her up! -- +++$+++ :OK, I just accepted. (Didn't see it the first time). Go ahead and start her up! --[[User:D-Day|D-Day]] ([[User talk:D-Day|talk]]) 19:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

529253 +++$+++ evrik +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-04 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.204676880E09 +++$+++ Check out my comments at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#UCLA digital library program]]. -- +++$+++ Check out my comments at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#UCLA digital library program]]. --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 16:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
529254 +++$+++ evrik +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529253 +++$+++ 529253 +++$+++ 2008-03-04 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.204680000E09 +++$+++ Before we go any further, do you know how to contact the uploader? They haven't answered my email. -- +++$+++ *Before we go any further, do you know how to contact the uploader? They haven't answered my email. --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 17:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
529255 +++$+++ evrik +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529253 +++$+++ 529253 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.205280240E09 +++$+++ okay. -- +++$+++ *okay. --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 17:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

267110 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267110 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-11 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.189496400E09 +++$+++ OK, not quite sure what the issue is, but remove the straight \"Psychology\" category if you wish, as long as the NOS stays. The phenomenon is far more than just neuropsychology.  +++$+++ OK, not quite sure what the issue is, but remove the straight "Psychology" category if you wish, as long as the NOS stays. The phenomenon is far more than just neuropsychology. [[User:Tony1|Tony]] 00:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
267111 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267110 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.189504860E09 +++$+++ Uh-oh. I don't think some people will be comfortable with all of that coming under an umbrella of Neuropsychology. I'm wondering why there's a problem if a large number of articles are categorised under a single one. Problem is that a lot of psychology-related stuff is going to lie in more than one of these large-scale categories, don't you think?  +++$+++ :::Uh-oh. I don't think some people will be comfortable with all of that coming under an umbrella of Neuropsychology. I'm wondering why there's a problem if a large number of articles are categorised under a single one. Problem is that a lot of psychology-related stuff is going to lie in more than one of these large-scale categories, don't you think? [[User:Tony1|Tony]] 03:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
267112 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267110 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.189548600E09 +++$+++ Your attention to this issue is important to the project. Please don't be discouraged. I don't have time right now, but I ''will'' deal with the issue in the next month, for the ?three articles I've started in the area. Thanks for pointing out this stuff to me.  +++$+++ ::::Your attention to this issue is important to the project. Please don't be discouraged. I don't have time right now, but I ''will'' deal with the issue in the next month, for the ?three articles I've started in the area. Thanks for pointing out this stuff to me. [[User:Tony1|Tony]] 15:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

267113 +++$+++ Basar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-11 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.189578240E09 +++$+++ Why are you removing all of these categories from categories? I've looked over your edits, and none of them make any sense to me. For example, removing structural analysis from structural engineering. \u2013 ''' +++$+++ Why are you removing all of these categories from categories? I've looked over your edits, and none of them make any sense to me. For example, removing structural analysis from structural engineering. – '''[[User:Basar|Basar]]''' ([[User talk:Basar|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Basar|contribs]]) 23:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
267114 +++$+++ Basar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267113 +++$+++ 267113 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.189578780E09 +++$+++ Cleaning up engineering would be great, but that doesn't explain why removing subcats from the structural engineering or mechanical engineering cat helps. \u2013 ''' +++$+++ :Cleaning up engineering would be great, but that doesn't explain why removing subcats from the structural engineering or mechanical engineering cat helps. – '''[[User:Basar|Basar]]''' ([[User talk:Basar|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Basar|contribs]]) 23:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
267115 +++$+++ Basar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267113 +++$+++ 267114 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.189579080E09 +++$+++ You respond incredibly quickly. I'm not encouraging you to stop, I hope you continue to help clean up the cat, I know that they need it, I've been cleaning up a lot of the cats myself, but I don't at all understand how your particular moves were helping, that's all. When I clean up cats, I move individual articles from overly broad cats to more specific sub cats of the larger cat. Doesn't that make sense? \u2013 ''' +++$+++ ::You respond incredibly quickly. I'm not encouraging you to stop, I hope you continue to help clean up the cat, I know that they need it, I've been cleaning up a lot of the cats myself, but I don't at all understand how your particular moves were helping, that's all. When I clean up cats, I move individual articles from overly broad cats to more specific sub cats of the larger cat. Doesn't that make sense? – '''[[User:Basar|Basar]]''' ([[User talk:Basar|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Basar|contribs]]) 23:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
267116 +++$+++ Basar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267113 +++$+++ 267115 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.189581660E09 +++$+++ I agree with everything that you have said on my talk page, and I have been doing the ''exact'' same thing to help cleanup categories [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Matrix_stiffness_method&diff=155339711&oldid=135259488]. However, I was asking about particular moves to the structural engineering cat which were entirely different [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Category:Structural_analysis&diff=prev&oldid=157254214]. In fact, just a few days ago, I moved all of the structural analysis articles from the structural engineering cat into the structural analysis cat. That is exactly what you are encouraging me to do on my talk page, but your moves have been undoing it. If you don't want to work on the engineering cats anymore, that's OK, I'll clean up the things you did. I am guessing that your moves just stem from not understanding how particular parts of engineering are related (if anything, you should have removed numerical analysis from structural analysis, not leave it as the only parent cat), and by coming here, I just wanted to let you know of a few of those mistakes. I'm sorry that you are feeling \"bitten\" for your contributions, but I welcome you to make more of the contributions you have discussed on my page. \u2013 ''' +++$+++ :::I agree with everything that you have said on my talk page, and I have been doing the ''exact'' same thing to help cleanup categories [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Matrix_stiffness_method&diff=155339711&oldid=135259488]. However, I was asking about particular moves to the structural engineering cat which were entirely different [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Structural_analysis&diff=prev&oldid=157254214]. In fact, just a few days ago, I moved all of the structural analysis articles from the structural engineering cat into the structural analysis cat. That is exactly what you are encouraging me to do on my talk page, but your moves have been undoing it. If you don't want to work on the engineering cats anymore, that's OK, I'll clean up the things you did. I am guessing that your moves just stem from not understanding how particular parts of engineering are related (if anything, you should have removed numerical analysis from structural analysis, not leave it as the only parent cat), and by coming here, I just wanted to let you know of a few of those mistakes. I'm sorry that you are feeling "bitten" for your contributions, but I welcome you to make more of the contributions you have discussed on my page. – '''[[User:Basar|Basar]]''' ([[User talk:Basar|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Basar|contribs]]) 00:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
267117 +++$+++ Basar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267113 +++$+++ 267116 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.189582800E09 +++$+++ It wasn't the wrong diff, I was showing you my edit. I was showing you that I do the same type of editing. Are you feeling OK right now? You seem like a really wonderful editor, but to be honest, you seem to be \"off the mark\" right now. \u2013 ''' +++$+++ ::::It wasn't the wrong diff, I was showing you my edit. I was showing you that I do the same type of editing. Are you feeling OK right now? You seem like a really wonderful editor, but to be honest, you seem to be "off the mark" right now. – '''[[User:Basar|Basar]]''' ([[User talk:Basar|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Basar|contribs]]) 00:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

4971 +++$+++ Underneath-it-All +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-02 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.157181660E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For contributing so much to the [[Child Ballads]] articles, which I have recently discovered. You truly deserve the original barnstar. Keep up the wonderful work! --  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For contributing so much to the [[Child Ballads]] articles, which I have recently discovered. You truly deserve the original barnstar. Keep up the wonderful work! -- [[User:Underneath-it-All|Underneath-it-All]] 00:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
4972 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4971 +++$+++ 4971 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.157419800E09 +++$+++ Thank you!  :D  +++$+++ :Thank you!  :D [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 18:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

4973 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-27 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.159425420E09 +++$+++ Hi Goldfritha, I noticed you when you found an old and lost pic of [[Ragnar Lodbrok]] and reinserted it. Checking your edits I have seen that you are one of those hard-working, vandalism-reverting, and polite users who should be admins but have not yet been asked and may be too modest to nominate themselves. Are you interested in becoming an admin? I could nominate you if you'd like to.-- +++$+++ Hi Goldfritha, I noticed you when you found an old and lost pic of [[Ragnar Lodbrok]] and reinserted it. Checking your edits I have seen that you are one of those hard-working, vandalism-reverting, and polite users who should be admins but have not yet been asked and may be too modest to nominate themselves. Are you interested in becoming an admin? I could nominate you if you'd like to.--[[User:Berig|Berig]] 23:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
4974 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4973 +++$+++ 4973 +++$+++ 2006-09-29 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.159519140E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your kind words and for thinking I would be good -- I've looked over the page about admins and am not sure -- I will certainly decide over the weekend.   +++$+++ :Thank you for your kind words and for thinking I would be good -- I've looked over the page about admins and am not sure -- I will certainly decide over the weekend.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 01:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
4975 +++$+++ Ghirlandajo +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4973 +++$+++ 4974 +++$+++ 2006-09-29 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.159560420E09 +++$+++ Dear Goldfritha, I believe you should use [[edit summaries]] more often. In my experience, those who use edit summaries in 95% edits or even less often are unlikely to succeed on RfA. --<font color=\"FC4339\"> +++$+++ ::Dear Goldfritha, I believe you should use [[edit summaries]] more often. In my experience, those who use edit summaries in 95% edits or even less often are unlikely to succeed on RfA. --<font color="FC4339">[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</font></sup> 13:07, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
4976 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4973 +++$+++ 4975 +++$+++ 2006-10-02 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.159783380E09 +++$+++ Humm.  Well, I think I would like to be a Wikipedian a little longer before I try for admin, not having being editting for a year now -- Still, thanks for the offer, Berig.   +++$+++ :::Humm.  Well, I think I would like to be a Wikipedian a little longer before I try for admin, not having being editting for a year now -- Still, thanks for the offer, Berig.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 03:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

267118 +++$+++ Schwnj +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-12 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.189581000E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, Although I understand the need to put articles into subcategories, some of your recent recategorizations are off the mark. I reverted them with an explanation in the edit summary, only to have you make the changes again. For example, on the [[Legal psychology]] article, you removed the \"law\" and \"psychology\" categories and replaced them with \"forensic psychology.\" I explained in my edit summary that legal psychology is specifically NOT forensic psychology; a point that is also made in the introduction of both articles. In another example, you removed the \"psychology\" category from the article on [[Social psychology (psychology)|social psychology]]. Again, I understand that there is a social psychology subcategory, but I would have to imagine that, more than anything else, articles on the major subfields of psychology (social, clinical, developmental) deserve to remain in the top-level psychology category. - +++$+++ Mattisse, Although I understand the need to put articles into subcategories, some of your recent recategorizations are off the mark. I reverted them with an explanation in the edit summary, only to have you make the changes again. For example, on the [[Legal psychology]] article, you removed the "law" and "psychology" categories and replaced them with "forensic psychology." I explained in my edit summary that legal psychology is specifically NOT forensic psychology; a point that is also made in the introduction of both articles. In another example, you removed the "psychology" category from the article on [[Social psychology (psychology)|social psychology]]. Again, I understand that there is a social psychology subcategory, but I would have to imagine that, more than anything else, articles on the major subfields of psychology (social, clinical, developmental) deserve to remain in the top-level psychology category. -[[User:Schwnj|'''Nick''']]<font color="#FF9900">[[User talk:Schwnj|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">talk</sup>]]</font> 00:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
267119 +++$+++ Basar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267118 +++$+++ 267118 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.189583460E09 +++$+++ Well, just to help out Mattisse in a time that he\/she is being critized a lot, I personally like to remove articles like social psychology from a cat like psychology if social psychology is a subcat because a browser is going to see the social psychology subcat first and will just click on it. I imagine Wikipedia guidelines support both and leave it up to the user to make a judgment call. \u2013 ''' +++$+++ :Well, just to help out Mattisse in a time that he/she is being critized a lot, I personally like to remove articles like social psychology from a cat like psychology if social psychology is a subcat because a browser is going to see the social psychology subcat first and will just click on it. I imagine Wikipedia guidelines support both and leave it up to the user to make a judgment call. – '''[[User:Basar|Basar]]''' ([[User talk:Basar|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Basar|contribs]]) 00:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

529265 +++$+++ Twelsht +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529265 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-10 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.205167320E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, This message is to inform you that I recently nominated Jack Warner as a featured article candidate. Your comments would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, again, for your detailed feedback and recommendations! Cheers, --  +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, This message is to inform you that I recently nominated Jack Warner as a featured article candidate. Your comments would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, again, for your detailed feedback and recommendations! Cheers, -- [[User:Twelsht|twelsht]] ([[User talk:Twelsht|talk]]) 09:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
529266 +++$+++ Twelsht +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529265 +++$+++ 529265 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.205457600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your feedback and support! Best, --  +++$+++ :Thanks for your feedback and support! Best, -- [[User:Twelsht|twelsht]] ([[User talk:Twelsht|talk]]) 18:20, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
529267 +++$+++ Twelsht +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529265 +++$+++ 529266 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.205664600E09 +++$+++ Good to hear! Thanks, once again, for all your feedback! Be sure to let me know when [[Alan Kulwicki]] is nominated as an FA. With appreciation, --  +++$+++ ::Good to hear! Thanks, once again, for all your feedback! Be sure to let me know when [[Alan Kulwicki]] is nominated as an FA. With appreciation, -- [[User:Twelsht|twelsht]] ([[User talk:Twelsht|talk]]) 03:50, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

4978 +++$+++ Pictureuploader +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4978 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-22 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.161574080E09 +++$+++ Could you cite your sources? Not only this is the WP rule, I also wonder what works feature the Golden Age  +++$+++ Could you cite your sources? Not only this is the WP rule, I also wonder what works feature the Golden Age [[User:Pictureuploader|Pictureuploader]] 20:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
4979 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4978 +++$+++ 4978 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.161670320E09 +++$+++ Drat.  I should have kept them handy and done it up front.  I will have to look them up and it will take some time.  Sorry.   +++$+++ :Drat.  I should have kept them handy and done it up front.  I will have to look them up and it will take some time.  Sorry.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 23:12, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
4980 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4978 +++$+++ 4978 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.162086660E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia is not a theological encyclopedia, let alone a standard one.  You should revise your standards for inclusion accordingly.   +++$+++ :Wikipedia is not a theological encyclopedia, let alone a standard one.  You should revise your standards for inclusion accordingly.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 18:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

529268 +++$+++ Michael Greiner +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-10 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.205213100E09 +++$+++ I'll unprotect the article for now, but I don't think it will last long based off of previous experience with the article. -- +++$+++ I'll unprotect the article for now, but I don't think it will last long based off of previous experience with the article. --[[User:Michael Greiner|Michael]] [[User talk:Michael Greiner|Greiner]] 22:25, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
529269 +++$+++ Michael Greiner +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529268 +++$+++ 529268 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.205470140E09 +++$+++ Unprotection lasted about 30 hours before a request at [[WP:RFPP]] and then an indefinite semi-protect being reapplied by [[User:EncMstr|EncMstr]], with 10 vandal edits in that time. -- +++$+++ :Unprotection lasted about 30 hours before a request at [[WP:RFPP]] and then an indefinite semi-protect being reapplied by [[User:EncMstr|EncMstr]], with 10 vandal edits in that time. --[[User:Michael Greiner|Michael]] [[User talk:Michael Greiner|Greiner]] 21:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

4981 +++$+++ Otto1970 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4981 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.161951600E09 +++$+++ Not sure if you have an interest in getting involved, but [[A Book of Mermaids]] is having its notability challenged. I guess, hypothetically, this could eventually lead to the article being deleted, which would open the door for all of the articles on the [[Ruth Manning-Sanders]] books being deleted. So, just wanted to give you a heads up in case you wanted to join the fledgling discussion.  +++$+++ Not sure if you have an interest in getting involved, but [[A Book of Mermaids]] is having its notability challenged. I guess, hypothetically, this could eventually lead to the article being deleted, which would open the door for all of the articles on the [[Ruth Manning-Sanders]] books being deleted. So, just wanted to give you a heads up in case you wanted to join the fledgling discussion. [[User:Otto1970|Otto1970]] 05:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
4982 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4981 +++$+++ 4981 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.162017840E09 +++$+++ Thank you.   +++$+++ :Thank you.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 23:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

4983 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-10 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.163163360E09 +++$+++ Well, dang, I didn't mean to write that much.  Guess I have a lot more thoughts on the subject than I thought!  I have to agree with you and Snowfire over there.  Let me see how I can assist.  Thanks for the invite, and sorry to bend your ear like this!  +++$+++ Well, dang, I didn't mean to write that much.  Guess I have a lot more thoughts on the subject than I thought!  I have to agree with you and Snowfire over there.  Let me see how I can assist.  Thanks for the invite, and sorry to bend your ear like this! [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 04:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
4984 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4983 +++$+++ 4983 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.164109800E09 +++$+++ Can't an administrator move the history?  If not, I don't really see how it's important anyway, to tell the truth...the important stuff can be saved on the current article's talk page or in an archive.   +++$+++ :Can't an administrator move the history?  If not, I don't really see how it's important anyway, to tell the truth...the important stuff can be saved on the current article's talk page or in an archive.  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 03:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
4985 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4983 +++$+++ 4983 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.164269340E09 +++$+++ Well, if he ever ignores a consensus on a RFC, there are higher authorities that can be invoked.   +++$+++ :Well, if he ever ignores a consensus on a RFC, there are higher authorities that can be invoked.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 00:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
4986 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4983 +++$+++ 4985 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.164269880E09 +++$+++ Good point.  And thus far, consensus doth not goeth his way... :)  +++$+++ ::Good point.  And thus far, consensus doth not goeth his way... :) [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 00:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
4987 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4983 +++$+++ 4986 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.164271140E09 +++$+++ Do you think a RFC on him, as a user, is suitable?   +++$+++ :::Do you think a RFC on him, as a user, is suitable?  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 00:39, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
4988 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4983 +++$+++ 4987 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.164336600E09 +++$+++ Unless he's done something more egregious than in the current discussion, I don't think it's  time for a user RfC on him.  We'll see how it goes after the redirect\/delete RfC is over.  +++$+++ ::::Unless he's done something more egregious than in the current discussion, I don't think it's  time for a user RfC on him.  We'll see how it goes after the redirect/delete RfC is over. [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 18:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

529272 +++$+++ Kakofonous +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.205355720E09 +++$+++ Since [[:Image:Mamadou Diabate.jpg|this image]] is not, and probably will not, be on the main page again, can you delete it from Wikipedia and just let it link from Commons? -- +++$+++ Since [[:Image:Mamadou Diabate.jpg|this image]] is not, and probably will not, be on the main page again, can you delete it from Wikipedia and just let it link from Commons? --[[User:Kakofonous|Kakofonous]] ([[User talk:Kakofonous|talk]]) 14:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
529273 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529272 +++$+++ 529272 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.205394600E09 +++$+++ Admins like myself periodically delete these images every few days. I deleted it.  +++$+++ :Admins like myself periodically delete these images every few days. I deleted it. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 00:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

529274 +++$+++ CatonB +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.205383980E09 +++$+++ Hi - Done - can you please review if I've done it correctly (I'm really sick and tired of this vogon red tape - there is a clear case for vandalism on that article and it has to stop and no one is doing anything about it) Thanks -- +++$+++ Hi - Done - can you please review if I've done it correctly (I'm really sick and tired of this vogon red tape - there is a clear case for vandalism on that article and it has to stop and no one is doing anything about it) Thanks --[[User:CatonB|CatonB]] ([[User talk:CatonB|talk]]) 21:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
529275 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529274 +++$+++ 529274 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.205395200E09 +++$+++ I don't really care if [[Councillors of City of Glen Eira]] stays or gets deleted, but I felt that it didn't meet speedy deletion criteria. Thanks for letting me know.  +++$+++ :I don't really care if [[Councillors of City of Glen Eira]] stays or gets deleted, but I felt that it didn't meet speedy deletion criteria. Thanks for letting me know. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 01:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
529276 +++$+++ CatonB +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529274 +++$+++ 529275 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.205399940E09 +++$+++ Cool :) Thanks though -- +++$+++ :: Cool :) Thanks though --[[User:CatonB|CatonB]] ([[User talk:CatonB|talk]]) 02:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

4989 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4989 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-23 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.164336600E09 +++$+++ What do you think about this: since [[Magicians in fantasy]] was apparently created from information culled from [[Magician]] and [[Wizard (fantasy)]], and according to jc37 who created the article, there is little to no content from [[Wizard (fantasy)]], then why do we even ''need'' an article that is mostly a copy of [[Magician]]?  I think we need to move all the content from [[Magicians in fantasy]] to [[Magician]], delete the first and redirect [[Wizard (fantasy)]] to [[Magician]].  +++$+++ What do you think about this: since [[Magicians in fantasy]] was apparently created from information culled from [[Magician]] and [[Wizard (fantasy)]], and according to jc37 who created the article, there is little to no content from [[Wizard (fantasy)]], then why do we even ''need'' an article that is mostly a copy of [[Magician]]?  I think we need to move all the content from [[Magicians in fantasy]] to [[Magician]], delete the first and redirect [[Wizard (fantasy)]] to [[Magician]]. [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 18:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
4990 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4989 +++$+++ 4989 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.164350460E09 +++$+++ The second one is, of course, not a reason against a merge but a reason why it might not clear up the dispute.  0:)   +++$+++ :The second one is, of course, not a reason against a merge but a reason why it might not clear up the dispute.  0:)  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 22:41, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

4991 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-13 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.166000520E09 +++$+++ Thank you for changing the redirect to the proper location!  I believe we have consensus as well as Wikipedia policy and guideline on our side.   +++$+++ Thank you for changing the redirect to the proper location!  I believe we have consensus as well as Wikipedia policy and guideline on our side.  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 01:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
4992 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4991 +++$+++ 4991 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.166087760E09 +++$+++ I don't think we should continue arguing with him over the redirect issue, unless he tries to change it back.  I disagree with every single one of the points in his last edit, including the part about [[WP:AGF]].  Let me know if you think differently.   +++$+++ :I don't think we should continue arguing with him over the redirect issue, unless he tries to change it back.  I disagree with every single one of the points in his last edit, including the part about [[WP:AGF]].  Let me know if you think differently.  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 01:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
4993 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4991 +++$+++ 4992 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.166174100E09 +++$+++ Not feeling the least urge to argue myself, unless he takes silence for consent and changes it.  (Man, what [[WP:OWN]] issues!)   +++$+++ ::Not feeling the least urge to argue myself, unless he takes silence for consent and changes it.  (Man, what [[WP:OWN]] issues!)  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 01:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
4994 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4991 +++$+++ 4993 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.166233260E09 +++$+++ He started again.  This time he's un-archived (or is it de-archived? :) the entire talk page.  Yep, definite [[WP:OWN|ownership]] issues.   +++$+++ :::He started again.  This time he's un-archived (or is it de-archived? :) the entire talk page.  Yep, definite [[WP:OWN|ownership]] issues.  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 17:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
4995 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4991 +++$+++ 4994 +++$+++ 2006-12-16 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.166271960E09 +++$+++ And there's RFC on him, rather than the article, too.   +++$+++ ::::And there's RFC on him, rather than the article, too.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 04:26, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
4996 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4991 +++$+++ 4995 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.166540400E09 +++$+++ Well, I tried the very long-winded, somewhat repetitive approach to see if I can get my (our) points across.  I'm sure he'll just \"cherry-pick\" my comments and try to respond to individual sentences rather than the over-all message I was trying to present.  If this one fails...well, he just has to go to mediation!  I read your RfC messages, Centrix is a very helpful and knowlegable admin - he can be a big help!  A good question to ask is \"what is consensus?\"  Is it all editors finally agreeing, or is it majority\/supermajority?  And what about just a small group - say a group of only three or four editors where only a single one is the hold-out.  What would be the next step?  Mediation or Admin intervention?  I hope it's the latter...  <sigh>   +++$+++ :::::Well, I tried the very long-winded, somewhat repetitive approach to see if I can get my (our) points across.  I'm sure he'll just "cherry-pick" my comments and try to respond to individual sentences rather than the over-all message I was trying to present.  If this one fails...well, he just has to go to mediation!  I read your RfC messages, Centrix is a very helpful and knowlegable admin - he can be a big help!  A good question to ask is "what is consensus?"  Is it all editors finally agreeing, or is it majority/supermajority?  And what about just a small group - say a group of only three or four editors where only a single one is the hold-out.  What would be the next step?  Mediation or Admin intervention?  I hope it's the latter...  <sigh>  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 07:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

267136 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267136 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.189732440E09 +++$+++ Sorry about the edit conflict, which I was unaware of. I find one way to deal with them is to copy my paragraph from the edit conflict page, back all the way  out to the page text, and re-edit the section in question with a simple paste; that usually works.  +++$+++ Sorry about the edit conflict, which I was unaware of. I find one way to deal with them is to copy my paragraph from the edit conflict page, back all the way  out to the page text, and re-edit the section in question with a simple paste; that usually works. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 18:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
267137 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267136 +++$+++ 267136 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.189732740E09 +++$+++ I did do that as that is my normal way to cope. But somehow, since there were five or six edit conflicts, and the page is so long that it is difficult to find the correct place, I accidently lost my copy.  -- +++$+++ :I did do that as that is my normal way to cope. But somehow, since there were five or six edit conflicts, and the page is so long that it is difficult to find the correct place, I accidently lost my copy.  --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 18:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

267139 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267139 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.189739280E09 +++$+++ It goes on.  What do you think?  -- +++$+++ It goes on.  What do you think?  --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 20:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
267140 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267139 +++$+++ 267139 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.189739280E09 +++$+++ That is what I have found so far in terms of definitions. -- +++$+++ :That is what I have found so far in terms of definitions. --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 20:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

529284 +++$+++ Jgrace1294 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529284 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-13 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.205465340E09 +++$+++ If you do the [[Racing in Wisconsin]] article, remember that [[CORR]] and [[SODA]] both started there, and that the [[WSORR]] is now the prevalant off road racing sanctioning body in the area.   +++$+++ If you do the [[Racing in Wisconsin]] article, remember that [[CORR]] and [[SODA]] both started there, and that the [[WSORR]] is now the prevalant off road racing sanctioning body in the area.  [[User:Jgrace1294|Jgrace1294]] ([[User talk:Jgrace1294|talk]]) 20:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
529285 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529284 +++$+++ 529284 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.205470800E09 +++$+++ Yea, I went to one or two SODA race at Road America. I love off-road racing. One of my short to medium-term goals is create article about the big CORR and SODA racers. I even have a source for some current images from a flickr friend. I'm working on the big drag racers right now.  +++$+++ :Yea, I went to one or two SODA race at Road America. I love off-road racing. One of my short to medium-term goals is create article about the big CORR and SODA racers. I even have a source for some current images from a flickr friend. I'm working on the big drag racers right now. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 22:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

4997 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-21 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.166700420E09 +++$+++ I don't know if we have consensus nailed down hard enough to make it \"Admin intervention.\"  (Sometime about unwillingness on editors to deal with this, I suspect.) Mediation, certainly -- if he tries something besides quarreling on the talk page.   +++$+++ I don't know if we have consensus nailed down hard enough to make it "Admin intervention."  (Sometime about unwillingness on editors to deal with this, I suspect.) Mediation, certainly -- if he tries something besides quarreling on the talk page.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 03:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
4998 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4997 +++$+++ 4997 +++$+++ 2006-12-31 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.167617880E09 +++$+++ OTOH, the consensus was nailed down hard on the \"delete\" issue, and it was agreed that the history should be preserved.  The latest act dissolves the connection between the redirect and its history.   +++$+++ :OTOH, the consensus was nailed down hard on the "delete" issue, and it was agreed that the history should be preserved.  The latest act dissolves the connection between the redirect and its history.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 18:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
4999 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 4997 +++$+++ 4998 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.167826620E09 +++$+++ Well, I made a request.  You may look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&oldid=98356460#Wizard_.28fantasy.29 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#Wizard (fantasy)].   +++$+++ ::Well, I made a request.  You may look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=98356460#Wizard_.28fantasy.29 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Wizard (fantasy)].  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 04:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

529287 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-15 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.205567400E09 +++$+++ Okay, fixed. I only use {{user|Nishkid}} for DYK crediting, so I made a mention of that on its userpage. <span style=\"background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;\"> +++$+++ Okay, fixed. I only use {{user|Nishkid}} for DYK crediting, so I made a mention of that on its userpage. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not love]])</sub> 00:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
529288 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529287 +++$+++ 529287 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.205714160E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Seraphim Whipp|<font color="FF69B4">Seraphim&hearts;</font>]]  [[User_talk:Seraphim Whipp|<sup><font color="black">Whipp</font></sup>]] 17:36, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

5000 +++$+++ Wetman +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-14 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.163519100E09 +++$+++ Not every prophecy is a self-fulfilling prophecy. In a self-fulfilling prophecy, the very actions that are taken in order to avoid the perceived prophecy are what set in motion the chain of events by which the prophecy is fulfilled. I think rather than using silent piped links, it would be best to briefly describe why a certain prophecy is self-fulfilling in each case, with a direct link. -- +++$+++ Not every prophecy is a self-fulfilling prophecy. In a self-fulfilling prophecy, the very actions that are taken in order to avoid the perceived prophecy are what set in motion the chain of events by which the prophecy is fulfilled. I think rather than using silent piped links, it would be best to briefly describe why a certain prophecy is self-fulfilling in each case, with a direct link. --[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] 07:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
5001 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5000 +++$+++ 5000 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.163578320E09 +++$+++ It would help if you have a problem with an article, that you then mention '''that''' article.  And since, yes, the very actions undertaken to prevent Telephus from fulfilling the oracle caused him to, it's a classic example of a self-fulfilling prophecy.   +++$+++ :It would help if you have a problem with an article, that you then mention '''that''' article.  And since, yes, the very actions undertaken to prevent Telephus from fulfilling the oracle caused him to, it's a classic example of a self-fulfilling prophecy.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 00:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

611062 +++$+++ Tonalone +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-06 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.275863700E09 +++$+++ Yes, it is a featured article, but that doesn't mean it is impervious to error. If you have an understanding of the topic, in this case English literary history, specifically Byron, and also have come across the banned editor's work, primarily Haiduc, you will understand that this is another case of his damage gone awry and undetected. Please discuss with me before undoing it again. I am trying to comb through the work to see what is legit and what is not. This has been done with several of his other articles. The difference here is this is a featured article.-- +++$+++ Yes, it is a featured article, but that doesn't mean it is impervious to error. If you have an understanding of the topic, in this case English literary history, specifically Byron, and also have come across the banned editor's work, primarily Haiduc, you will understand that this is another case of his damage gone awry and undetected. Please discuss with me before undoing it again. I am trying to comb through the work to see what is legit and what is not. This has been done with several of his other articles. The difference here is this is a featured article.--[[User:Tonalone|Tonalone]] ([[User talk:Tonalone|talk]]) 15:35, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
611063 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611062 +++$+++ 611062 +++$+++ 2010-06-06 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.275863820E09 +++$+++ Again, stop destroying the article. Bring it up with others before you halve a page that is featured. We will keep reverting you until you discuss this because it is clearly being disruptive.  +++$+++ :Again, stop destroying the article. Bring it up with others before you halve a page that is featured. We will keep reverting you until you discuss this because it is clearly being disruptive. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 15:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

529291 +++$+++ Miller17CU94 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-19 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.205913180E09 +++$+++ FYI. DYK needs updating ASAP. Four hours overdue.  +++$+++ FYI. DYK needs updating ASAP. Four hours overdue. [[User:Miller17CU94|Chris]] ([[User talk:Miller17CU94|talk]]) 00:53, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
529292 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529291 +++$+++ 529291 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.205913240E09 +++$+++ Will do.  +++$+++ :Will do. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 00:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
529293 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529291 +++$+++ 529292 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.205915160E09 +++$+++ I just checked all the author and nominator pages and I think between us we notified everyone. Sorry for the ec and thanks for the help,  +++$+++ ::I just checked all the author and nominator pages and I think between us we notified everyone. Sorry for the ec and thanks for the help, [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 01:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

5005 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-04 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.167897960E09 +++$+++ Wow, don't that beat all!  This definitely violates the spirit of the discussion, and is just a cheap trick.  Let's see if we can't get it put back.  I'm tempted to put in a user conduct RfC on this guy - this just goes beyond the bounds of how Wikipedia operates - by consensus and discussion, and following the Dispute Resolution steps.   +++$+++ Wow, don't that beat all!  This definitely violates the spirit of the discussion, and is just a cheap trick.  Let's see if we can't get it put back.  I'm tempted to put in a user conduct RfC on this guy - this just goes beyond the bounds of how Wikipedia operates - by consensus and discussion, and following the Dispute Resolution steps.  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 00:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
5006 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5005 +++$+++ 5005 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.167900360E09 +++$+++ Well, if you do, you can be sure that I will be there to confirm -- with details -- that he's been a problem.  (They need two editors to complain to validate a request, so we have to coordinate it and make sure we can both post in the time frame).   +++$+++ :Well, if you do, you can be sure that I will be there to confirm -- with details -- that he's been a problem.  (They need two editors to complain to validate a request, so we have to coordinate it and make sure we can both post in the time frame).  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 00:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
5007 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5005 +++$+++ 5006 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.168050900E09 +++$+++ Whatever happened with the Admin notice board entry on this?  +++$+++ ::Whatever happened with the Admin notice board entry on this? [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 18:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
5008 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5005 +++$+++ 5007 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.168069140E09 +++$+++ Otherwise, I think our options are the Request for Comment on the user.   +++$+++ :::Otherwise, I think our options are the Request for Comment on the user.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 23:39, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
5009 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5005 +++$+++ 5008 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.168486260E09 +++$+++ Nothing from the admin yet.  Not sure what's up, he's usually good at responding.  Perhaps if you weighed in too:  [[User_talk:InShaneee#User_ignoring_policy|complaint]].   +++$+++ ::::Nothing from the admin yet.  Not sure what's up, he's usually good at responding.  Perhaps if you weighed in too:  [[User_talk:InShaneee#User_ignoring_policy|complaint]].  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 19:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
5010 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5005 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.168569480E09 +++$+++ I put a [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#User_ignoring_policy|new request]] on the ANI board and got an unsatisfactory response.  I'm not certain they understand or want to deal with the issue.  We can't go to mediation as the one admin suggests if jc37 doesn't respect us or the process, he's already bypassed the dispute resolution process, which includes mediation!  They may not want to deal with it because there is so much to it.  I certainly hope I never have to deal with jc37 again after this.   +++$+++ ::::::I put a [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User_ignoring_policy|new request]] on the ANI board and got an unsatisfactory response.  I'm not certain they understand or want to deal with the issue.  We can't go to mediation as the one admin suggests if jc37 doesn't respect us or the process, he's already bypassed the dispute resolution process, which includes mediation!  They may not want to deal with it because there is so much to it.  I certainly hope I never have to deal with jc37 again after this.  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 18:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
5011 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5005 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.168598460E09 +++$+++ Actually, I think if we could move back the history and point it to \"Magicians in fantasy\" we could go on from there.  But then, I proposed moving \"Wizard (fantasy)\" to \"Magicians in fantasy\" as a compromise. +++$+++ :::::::Actually, I think if we could move back the history and point it to "Magicians in fantasy" we could go on from there.  But then, I proposed moving "Wizard (fantasy)" to "Magicians in fantasy" as a compromise.[[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 02:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

529295 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-19 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.205988060E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil. Can I ask you a favour? Would you be able to move [[Nelson Piquet Sr. (racing driver)]] back to [[Nelson Piquet]], per [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Formula_One#Nelson_Piquet|this discussion at WP:F1]]. Because the redirect has been edited since the original move, it needs admin assistance to move it back. I've listed it at [[WP:Requested Moves]], but there seems to be a bit of a backlog there at the moment. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil. Can I ask you a favour? Would you be able to move [[Nelson Piquet Sr. (racing driver)]] back to [[Nelson Piquet]], per [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Formula_One#Nelson_Piquet|this discussion at WP:F1]]. Because the redirect has been edited since the original move, it needs admin assistance to move it back. I've listed it at [[WP:Requested Moves]], but there seems to be a bit of a backlog there at the moment. Thanks. [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] ([[User talk:DH85868993|talk]]) 21:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
529296 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529295 +++$+++ 529295 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.206003720E09 +++$+++ Done - it was non-controversial and it made no sense to me the Nelson Piquet would be disambiguous.   +++$+++ :Done - it was non-controversial and it made no sense to me the Nelson Piquet would be disambiguous.  [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 02:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
529297 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529295 +++$+++ 529296 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.206004560E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] ([[User talk:DH85868993|talk]]) 02:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

267155 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267155 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-18 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.190101800E09 +++$+++ Hey there Mattisse. I hope you don't think I am singling you out or anything, I comment on lots of nominations if I happen to have stuff nominated at DYK myself, btw enjoyed the article that was previously featured on DYK. Thanks and keep up the good work.  +++$+++ Hey there Mattisse. I hope you don't think I am singling you out or anything, I comment on lots of nominations if I happen to have stuff nominated at DYK myself, btw enjoyed the article that was previously featured on DYK. Thanks and keep up the good work. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] 00:50, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
267156 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267155 +++$+++ 267155 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.190103120E09 +++$+++ Oh, good, glad to hear it. :) I am around if you need any assistance trying to make your way around here.  +++$+++ :Oh, good, glad to hear it. :) I am around if you need any assistance trying to make your way around here. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] 01:12, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
267157 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267155 +++$+++ 267156 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.190103240E09 +++$+++ Yeah, there isn't a tool on wiki that I know of. I use an external word processor, just MS Word but any program should work, as long as its word count feature has a character count too.  +++$+++ ::Yeah, there isn't a tool on wiki that I know of. I use an external word processor, just MS Word but any program should work, as long as its word count feature has a character count too. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] 01:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

5013 +++$+++ Paul foord +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.168117140E09 +++$+++ The article on [[Islamic marital jurisprudence]] talks of [[dowry]]. You hold this is incorrect. Whilst that page labels it dowry I expect editors to try to fix the entry at dowry by readding it.  +++$+++ The article on [[Islamic marital jurisprudence]] talks of [[dowry]]. You hold this is incorrect. Whilst that page labels it dowry I expect editors to try to fix the entry at dowry by readding it. [[User:Paul foord|Paul foord]] 12:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
5014 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5013 +++$+++ 5013 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.168148100E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  Plopped a comment on the discussion page.   +++$+++ :Thanks.  Plopped a comment on the discussion page.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 21:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

5015 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.168516380E09 +++$+++ Have you looked at [[List of fairy tales]] for French ones?   +++$+++ Have you looked at [[List of fairy tales]] for French ones?  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 03:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
5016 +++$+++ Goldenrowley +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5015 +++$+++ 5015 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.168516620E09 +++$+++ No I did not know about that really nice resource, thank you Goldfritha! +++$+++ :No I did not know about that really nice resource, thank you Goldfritha![[User:Goldenrowley|Goldenrowley]] 03:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
5017 +++$+++ Steve block +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5015 +++$+++ 5015 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.168641840E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I've had to withdraw from this, I apologise for messing you about.  I simply don't feel like I have the time and energy to devote to mediation.  As I indicated above, I'm not a mediator.  I feel you may be best served requesting a move through [[WP:RM|requested move]] and seeking mediation, if you can get all parties to agree.  Good luck, and once again I apologise.  +++$+++ *Sorry, I've had to withdraw from this, I apologise for messing you about.  I simply don't feel like I have the time and energy to devote to mediation.  As I indicated above, I'm not a mediator.  I feel you may be best served requesting a move through [[WP:RM|requested move]] and seeking mediation, if you can get all parties to agree.  Good luck, and once again I apologise. [[User:Steve block|Steve block]] <small>[[User talk:Steve block|Talk]]</small> 14:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

525124 +++$+++ Nrets +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525124 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-25 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.159172340E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, I noticed some of the recent expansions on [[Template:Nervous tissue]]. There are a lot of other things that could be inlcuded like [[Purkinje cell]]s, [[Renshaw cell]]s, etc. However I was wondering, how big can these templates get? Should they be as all-inclusive as possible or include only some key articles? Is there some guideline for this? My view is the bigger the better, but wanted to check before continuing to expand its scope.   +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, I noticed some of the recent expansions on [[Template:Nervous tissue]]. There are a lot of other things that could be inlcuded like [[Purkinje cell]]s, [[Renshaw cell]]s, etc. However I was wondering, how big can these templates get? Should they be as all-inclusive as possible or include only some key articles? Is there some guideline for this? My view is the bigger the better, but wanted to check before continuing to expand its scope.  [[User:Nrets|<font color="gray"><u>Nrets</u></font>]] 01:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
525125 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525124 +++$+++ 525124 +++$+++ 2006-09-25 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.159229700E09 +++$+++ I liked your additions. I don't believe there currently are specific guidelines. I tend to error in the side of inclusion, but then split up templates when they grow too big (as happened with the arteries template.) -- +++$+++ :I liked your additions. I don't believe there currently are specific guidelines. I tend to error in the side of inclusion, but then split up templates when they grow too big (as happened with the arteries template.) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 17:15, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

5018 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.169117880E09 +++$+++ Nice RM! Hopefully it will go through without issue.  +++$+++ Nice RM! Hopefully it will go through without issue. [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 02:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
5019 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5018 +++$+++ 5018 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.169118720E09 +++$+++ Hope so, but we had best watch it.  (Then, you noticed it even before I alerted you to it.)   +++$+++ :Hope so, but we had best watch it.  (Then, you noticed it even before I alerted you to it.)  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 03:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
5020 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5018 +++$+++ 5019 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.169189760E09 +++$+++ What's to be done with the contents of \"lists of magicians in fantasy\"? Will it be moved back to \"Wizard (fantasy) as well?   +++$+++ ::What's to be done with the contents of "lists of magicians in fantasy"? Will it be moved back to "Wizard (fantasy) as well?  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 22:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
5021 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5018 +++$+++ 5020 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.169196300E09 +++$+++ splitting out such a list from such an article would be fine, so I think letting it stand would be best -- unless it would convince jc37, in which case, merge.   +++$+++ :::splitting out such a list from such an article would be fine, so I think letting it stand would be best -- unless it would convince jc37, in which case, merge.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 00:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

267165 +++$+++ Craigtalbert +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267165 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-18 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.190166540E09 +++$+++ What exactly do you mean by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AEmotions_Anonymous&diff=158772969&oldid=154966249 this]? --  +++$+++ What exactly do you mean by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AEmotions_Anonymous&diff=158772969&oldid=154966249 this]? -- [[User:Craigtalbert|Craigtalbert]] 18:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
267166 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267165 +++$+++ 267165 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.190167380E09 +++$+++ The link is to the recent Arbitration Committee ruling. The Arbitration Committee has ruled that these are the standard for reference citations, especially for science-based articles, to prevent pseudo scientific information appearing in legitimately scientific categories. Actually, [[WP:V]] specifies that standard for all Wikipedia articles. The Arbitration Committee states specific reference citations must be from reliable third-party, unbiased sources. In the case of scientific references, the citations must be from peer-reviewed literature. Unpublished, self-published, and draft versions are specifically ruled out.   Since the Emotions Anonymous article is placed in scientific categories, it must follow these standards. Regards, -- +++$+++ :The link is to the recent Arbitration Committee ruling. The Arbitration Committee has ruled that these are the standard for reference citations, especially for science-based articles, to prevent pseudo scientific information appearing in legitimately scientific categories. Actually, [[WP:V]] specifies that standard for all Wikipedia articles. The Arbitration Committee states specific reference citations must be from reliable third-party, unbiased sources. In the case of scientific references, the citations must be from peer-reviewed literature. Unpublished, self-published, and draft versions are specifically ruled out.   Since the Emotions Anonymous article is placed in scientific categories, it must follow these standards. Regards, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 19:03, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
267167 +++$+++ Craigtalbert +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267165 +++$+++ 267166 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.190461800E09 +++$+++ Ohh, okay. If I didn't know better I'd think it was a passive aggressive way of saying the article was poorly researched or something like that. I'm sure if that was the case you would have cited specific examples rather than posting an ambiguous message in the talk page for the article. Thank you for the clarification. --  +++$+++ :: Ohh, okay. If I didn't know better I'd think it was a passive aggressive way of saying the article was poorly researched or something like that. I'm sure if that was the case you would have cited specific examples rather than posting an ambiguous message in the talk page for the article. Thank you for the clarification. -- [[User:Craigtalbert|Craigtalbert]] 04:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

5022 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-31 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.170236520E09 +++$+++ No action on the move yet, eh? Also, my thought is that the RfD tag isn't for the \"list\" article, but for the [[Wizard (fantasy)]] redirect.  Perhaps you're right, it should be left but we have to make it clear that the \"keep\" was referring to the redirect and not the article it's currently on - a very important distinction, I would think.  Then again, I'm recovering from the flu, and my brain is not what it should be yet... :)  +++$+++ No action on the move yet, eh? Also, my thought is that the RfD tag isn't for the "list" article, but for the [[Wizard (fantasy)]] redirect.  Perhaps you're right, it should be left but we have to make it clear that the "keep" was referring to the redirect and not the article it's currently on - a very important distinction, I would think.  Then again, I'm recovering from the flu, and my brain is not what it should be yet... :) [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 01:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
5023 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5022 +++$+++ 5022 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.170237000E09 +++$+++ Did you see the latest comments?  jc37 seems to think his parading of his history of edits means something.   +++$+++ :Did you see the latest comments?  jc37 seems to think his parading of his history of edits means something.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 01:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
5024 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5022 +++$+++ 5023 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.170243840E09 +++$+++ I know, it's weird.  I have no idea what his diffs are supposed to prove.  Sounds like Steve Block has a solid grip on what's happening.  I just don't understand how jc37 can't see it...or maybe he just won't admit it.  I like the way he's opposing the move (back) of the original move we opposed, an opposition which he ignored. :)   +++$+++ ::I know, it's weird.  I have no idea what his diffs are supposed to prove.  Sounds like Steve Block has a solid grip on what's happening.  I just don't understand how jc37 can't see it...or maybe he just won't admit it.  I like the way he's opposing the move (back) of the original move we opposed, an opposition which he ignored. :)  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 03:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
5025 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5022 +++$+++ 5024 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.170420120E09 +++$+++ Gee, no action on the RM yet.  Wonder what the problem is?  Has anyone communicated anything to you? (besides the usual suspects, that is?...heh)  +++$+++ :::Gee, no action on the RM yet.  Wonder what the problem is?  Has anyone communicated anything to you? (besides the usual suspects, that is?...heh) [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 04:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
5026 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5022 +++$+++ 5025 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.170421140E09 +++$+++ With Jc37 chiming in, they may have decided that the move is controversial.   +++$+++ ::::With Jc37 chiming in, they may have decided that the move is controversial.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 04:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
5027 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5022 +++$+++ 5026 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.170430140E09 +++$+++ It would be nice if they let us know.  If that fails, then what? Can we have the current [[Wizard (fantasy)]] article deleted (it has no history and no function, really).  Then move the lists page back and clean up the content from there?  This is really ridiculous that he just ''does'' with impunity, and we have to beg for scraps.   +++$+++ :::::It would be nice if they let us know.  If that fails, then what? Can we have the current [[Wizard (fantasy)]] article deleted (it has no history and no function, really).  Then move the lists page back and clean up the content from there?  This is really ridiculous that he just ''does'' with impunity, and we have to beg for scraps.  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 07:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
5028 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5022 +++$+++ 5027 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.170656460E09 +++$+++ We could do it too.  It just wouldn't be right.   +++$+++ ::::::We could do it too.  It just wouldn't be right.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 22:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
5029 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5022 +++$+++ 5028 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.171294080E09 +++$+++ What other way is there besides convincing Mr. Unconvincible?  I think what he did was wrong and we're just putting the pieces back to where they belong.  I think it's wrong of us to just let him get away with such an abuse.  Hmph.  :D   +++$+++ :::::::What other way is there besides convincing Mr. Unconvincible?  I think what he did was wrong and we're just putting the pieces back to where they belong.  I think it's wrong of us to just let him get away with such an abuse.  Hmph.  :D  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 07:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
5030 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5022 +++$+++ 5028 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.171295520E09 +++$+++ Actually, they did find it controversial, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves&diff=106555611&oldid=106531498], so that's not gonna work.  I propose we move \"Wizard (fantasy)\" to \"Fantasy wizards\" as a redirect as is, then move \"list of magicians\" to \"Wizard (fantasy)\", create another \"list of magicians\", copy paste the contents there, then put the redirect back to what it was originally.  THEN we're back to where we were before the violation by jc, and we can discuss from that point.  What do you think?   +++$+++ :::::::Actually, they did find it controversial, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves&diff=106555611&oldid=106531498], so that's not gonna work.  I propose we move "Wizard (fantasy)" to "Fantasy wizards" as a redirect as is, then move "list of magicians" to "Wizard (fantasy)", create another "list of magicians", copy paste the contents there, then put the redirect back to what it was originally.  THEN we're back to where we were before the violation by jc, and we can discuss from that point.  What do you think?  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 07:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
5031 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5022 +++$+++ 5030 +++$+++ 2007-02-14 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.171447920E09 +++$+++ Moving creates a redirect.  If we can move over it, we can just move \"List\" back to \"Wizard (fantasy)\".   +++$+++ ::::::::Moving creates a redirect.  If we can move over it, we can just move "List" back to "Wizard (fantasy)".  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 02:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
5032 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5022 +++$+++ 5031 +++$+++ 2007-02-14 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.171456440E09 +++$+++ So, we should move \"list\" on top of Wizard (fantasy), then create a new \"list\" to cut\/paste the content to?  Or visa-versa?  I'm not real clear on what you mean...heck, I'm not real clear on what I said either... :)  +++$+++ :::::::::So, we should move "list" on top of Wizard (fantasy), then create a new "list" to cut/paste the content to?  Or visa-versa?  I'm not real clear on what you mean...heck, I'm not real clear on what I said either... :) [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 04:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

267168 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-22 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.190480940E09 +++$+++ With Regards,<br> +++$+++ With Regards,<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelok</font>]] 10:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
267169 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267168 +++$+++ 267168 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.190485320E09 +++$+++ I found a copy of [http:\/\/dsr.nii.ac.jp\/toyobunko\/XI-3-A-b-124\/V-123\/ Records of the grand historian of China] in [http:\/\/dsr.nii.ac.jp\/toyobunko\/ here]. I'm beginning to envy the multilingual people who can read these beautiful books written in other languages.<br> +++$+++ :I found a copy of [http://dsr.nii.ac.jp/toyobunko/XI-3-A-b-124/V-123/ Records of the grand historian of China] in [http://dsr.nii.ac.jp/toyobunko/ here]. I'm beginning to envy the multilingual people who can read these beautiful books written in other languages.<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelok</font>]] 11:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

44528 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.289950200E09 +++$+++ <--You are sinful, and a bad, bad calvinist. That place you go, I can only dream of it.  +++$+++ <--You are sinful, and a bad, bad calvinist. That place you go, I can only dream of it. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 15:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
44529 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44528 +++$+++ 44528 +++$+++ 2010-11-17 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.289984760E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm going to Hell for sure. Bummer. Then again, I hear it's one big [[Ball culture|house party]]. Not exactly my cup of tea, but I guess it's better than eternity with a [[God_hates_fags|God who hates me]]. -  +++$+++ :Yeah, I'm going to Hell for sure. Bummer. Then again, I hear it's one big [[Ball culture|house party]]. Not exactly my cup of tea, but I guess it's better than eternity with a [[God_hates_fags|God who hates me]]. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 01:06, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
44530 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44528 +++$+++ 44529 +++$+++ 2010-11-17 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.290000120E09 +++$+++ Did you see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:God_Condemns_Homosexuality&action=history this]? \"You aren't helping things here.\" Indeed, because I reported him. You don't like ballroom dancing? I loved ''[[Strictly Ballroom]]''.  +++$+++ ::Did you see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:God_Condemns_Homosexuality&action=history this]? "You aren't helping things here." Indeed, because I reported him. You don't like ballroom dancing? I loved ''[[Strictly Ballroom]]''. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 05:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
44531 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44528 +++$+++ 44530 +++$+++ 2010-11-18 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.290081420E09 +++$+++ Well, ze did ask you to ''please'' go away. Ballroom isn't my thing. But, whatever floats you boat, ya know? -  +++$+++ :::Well, ze did ask you to ''please'' go away. Ballroom isn't my thing. But, whatever floats you boat, ya know? - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 03:57, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

481435 +++$+++ Redrose64 +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481435 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-15 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.284603360E09 +++$+++ Hi, are there any more Scotland local maps left to create? See [[Template talk:Infobox UK place#Maps for places in Scotland]]. -- +++$+++ Hi, are there any more Scotland local maps left to create? See [[Template talk:Infobox UK place#Maps for places in Scotland]]. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#d30000; background:#ffeeee">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 19:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
481436 +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ 481435 +++$+++ 481435 +++$+++ 2010-09-15 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.284610740E09 +++$+++ All the council areas are up now, so the Infobox should be able to call a localised map for anywhere (if desired) it does not ever ''need'' to fall back to the country-level mapping. On the other hand, larger scale maps, such as for individual islands (eg {{tl|Location map Scotland Isle of Skye}}) do not yet exist.-- +++$+++ :All the council areas are up now, so the Infobox should be able to call a localised map for anywhere (if desired) it does not ever ''need'' to fall back to the country-level mapping. On the other hand, larger scale maps, such as for individual islands (eg {{tl|Location map Scotland Isle of Skye}}) do not yet exist.--[[User:Nilfanion|Nilf]][[commons:User:Nilfanion|anion]] ([[User talk:Nilfanion|talk]]) 21:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

267174 +++$+++ Hila2410 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267174 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-23 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.190586540E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Hila2410|Hila2410]] 15:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
267175 +++$+++ Srl +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267174 +++$+++ 267174 +++$+++ 2007-09-23 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.190593500E09 +++$+++ No, they weren't my edits, they were by {{User|212.56.129.46}}. I've posted something to them saying thanks, but be constructive.   As for me, I should try to use better summaries. \u300c +++$+++ : No, they weren't my edits, they were by {{User|212.56.129.46}}. I've posted something to them saying thanks, but be constructive.   As for me, I should try to use better summaries. 「[[User:Srl|ѕʀʟ]]·[[User talk:Srl|✎]]」 17:25, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

5034 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-22 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.172132220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pointing out that \"undiscussed moves\" discussion, I hope something comes out of that - but it doesn't really look like it will.  I'm not sure what I'm looking for on the discussion page for [[Magician (fantasy)]] about this, what am I missing?  +++$+++ Thanks for pointing out that "undiscussed moves" discussion, I hope something comes out of that - but it doesn't really look like it will.  I'm not sure what I'm looking for on the discussion page for [[Magician (fantasy)]] about this, what am I missing? [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 00:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
5035 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5034 +++$+++ 5034 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.172132340E09 +++$+++ Oh, and there are still redirects on the talk pages too - (on the [[Wizard (fantasy)]] discussion page...redirected to [[Talk:Magician (fantasy)]].   +++$+++ :Oh, and there are still redirects on the talk pages too - (on the [[Wizard (fantasy)]] discussion page...redirected to [[Talk:Magician (fantasy)]].  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 00:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

529323 +++$+++ RyRy5 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529323 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-28 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.206712560E09 +++$+++ I have been seeing people talk behind my back about me. Mostly about my adoption program. I would like you to check [[User talk:Toddst1]]. You'll notice it around the bottom. I would like your opinion.--<font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ I have been seeing people talk behind my back about me. Mostly about my adoption program. I would like you to check [[User talk:Toddst1]]. You'll notice it around the bottom. I would like your opinion.--<font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="3">[[User:RyRy5|<font color="blue">RyRy5</font>]]</font> <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="3">[[User talk:RyRy5|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</font> 06:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
529324 +++$+++ RyRy5 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529323 +++$+++ 529323 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.206749160E09 +++$+++ I have 5 adoptees. One has been inactive for a long time ([[User:Tubesurfer]]). The adoption program is when I give my adoptees tests, and if possible, I also let an admin grade them. This helps my adoptees study more while taking tests. I would like your opinion on the [[User:RyRy5\/Adoption Program|Adoption Program]]. Thanks.--<font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :I have 5 adoptees. One has been inactive for a long time ([[User:Tubesurfer]]). The adoption program is when I give my adoptees tests, and if possible, I also let an admin grade them. This helps my adoptees study more while taking tests. I would like your opinion on the [[User:RyRy5/Adoption Program|Adoption Program]]. Thanks.--<font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="3">[[User:RyRy5|<font color="blue">RyRy5</font>]]</font> <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="3">[[User talk:RyRy5|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</font> 17:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

5036 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5036 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-22 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.172137680E09 +++$+++ So, it look like we actually got the move we asked for!  Or am I missing something?  Now we need to create a new \"List of fantasy wizards\", right?  +++$+++ So, it look like we actually got the move we asked for!  Or am I missing something?  Now we need to create a new "List of fantasy wizards", right? [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 01:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
5037 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5036 +++$+++ 5036 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.172138220E09 +++$+++ Och!  We did get our move!  I didn't see the final decision, even though it was outlined in a big green block!  Hurrah!!  Huzzah!  Now, what next?  :-D   +++$+++ :Och!  We did get our move!  I didn't see the final decision, even though it was outlined in a big green block!  Hurrah!!  Huzzah!  Now, what next?  :-D  [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 01:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
5038 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5036 +++$+++ 5037 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.172139060E09 +++$+++ Our move?  The history of \"Wizard (fantasy)\" is still at \"List of wizards in fantasy\".  That was the only move I was interested in.   +++$+++ ::Our move?  The history of "Wizard (fantasy)" is still at "List of wizards in fantasy".  That was the only move I was interested in.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 02:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
5039 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5036 +++$+++ 5038 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.172140140E09 +++$+++ Hmmm, guess I'm totally confused now.  Who requested that move?  Or was it just a mistake?  +++$+++ :::Hmmm, guess I'm totally confused now.  Who requested that move?  Or was it just a mistake? [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 02:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
5040 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5036 +++$+++ 5039 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.172143560E09 +++$+++ I made a comment on his talk page.   +++$+++ ::::I made a comment on his talk page.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 03:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
5041 +++$+++ Dreadlocke +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5036 +++$+++ 5040 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.172146020E09 +++$+++ Me too, I actually left instructions.  Please check them out and make sure they're right... +++$+++ :::::Me too, I actually left instructions.  Please check them out and make sure they're right...[[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] <small> [[User talk:Dreadlocke|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]] </small> 04:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

267181 +++$+++ Srl +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-24 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.190674080E09 +++$+++ BTW, shouldn't it say ''archived by {{User|MiszaBot III}}''? \u300c +++$+++ BTW, shouldn't it say ''archived by {{User|MiszaBot III}}''? 「[[User:Srl|ѕʀʟ]]·[[User talk:Srl|✎]]」 15:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
267182 +++$+++ Srl +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267181 +++$+++ 267181 +++$+++ 2007-09-24 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.190677740E09 +++$+++ it seems like a good service.. but the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse&diff=160006035&oldid=159832485 edit history] says that it is MiszaBot III which archives your page.. and [[User:Werdnabot]] says that Werdnabot is not functioning and that Werdna is not on wikipedia. \u300c +++$+++ : it seems like a good service.. but the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse&diff=160006035&oldid=159832485 edit history] says that it is MiszaBot III which archives your page.. and [[User:Werdnabot]] says that Werdnabot is not functioning and that Werdna is not on wikipedia. 「[[User:Srl|ѕʀʟ]]·[[User talk:Srl|✎]]」 16:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
267183 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267181 +++$+++ 267182 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.190852340E09 +++$+++ Is there a reason why this bothers you? When Werdnabot announced leaving, I was worried, but MiszaBot III took right up without skipping a beat. Is MiszaBot upset about the Werdnabot name remaining on pages? I have never heard that MiszaBot is, if that is the case. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Is there a reason why this bothers you? When Werdnabot announced leaving, I was worried, but MiszaBot III took right up without skipping a beat. Is MiszaBot upset about the Werdnabot name remaining on pages? I have never heard that MiszaBot is, if that is the case. Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
267184 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267181 +++$+++ 267181 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.190863440E09 +++$+++ I have never removed one. When I put the template on I added to the Wikipedia list (as directed on the template) and whoever handles that makes the decision to remove it or not. Once it is reported, I have never been involved in the outcome. If you want to edit, you can use the link suggested on the template.  You could ask a question on the copyright questions page (Sorry, I don't have the link right now but there is one somewhere.) -- +++$+++ :I have never removed one. When I put the template on I added to the Wikipedia list (as directed on the template) and whoever handles that makes the decision to remove it or not. Once it is reported, I have never been involved in the outcome. If you want to edit, you can use the link suggested on the template.  You could ask a question on the copyright questions page (Sorry, I don't have the link right now but there is one somewhere.) --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 20:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

529326 +++$+++ Dual Freq +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-29 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.206835800E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align:top; border-top:1px solid gray; color:black\" | For your work on Wisconsin related articles, I hereby award you a Wisconsin Barnstar. Keep up the good work! -- +++$+++ |style="vertical-align:top; border-top:1px solid gray; color:black" | For your work on Wisconsin related articles, I hereby award you a Wisconsin Barnstar. Keep up the good work! --[[User:Dual Freq|Dual Freq]] ([[User talk:Dual Freq|talk]]) 17:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
529327 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529326 +++$+++ 529326 +++$+++ 2008-03-29 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.206845640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for awarding me the above :-)   +++$+++ :Thanks for awarding me the above :-)  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 19:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

529328 +++$+++ VerruckteDan +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-29 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.206851760E09 +++$+++ I second that, thanks for the Barnstar, glad you find the templates helpful.   +++$+++ I second that, thanks for the Barnstar, glad you find the templates helpful.  [[User:VerruckteDan|VerruckteDan]] ([[User talk:VerruckteDan|talk]]) 21:36, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
529329 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529328 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-30 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.206939540E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for the Wisconsin Barnstar. +++$+++ ::Many thanks for the Wisconsin Barnstar.[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 21:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
529330 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529328 +++$+++ 529328 +++$+++ 2008-03-31 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.206987300E09 +++$+++ Go ahead and give User:Dual Freq the Wisconsin Barnstar. User:Dual Freq did lots of articles on Wisconsin as well as Iowa&Illinois. Thanks- +++$+++ :Go ahead and give User:Dual Freq the Wisconsin Barnstar. User:Dual Freq did lots of articles on Wisconsin as well as Iowa&Illinois. Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 11:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

5043 +++$+++ JoergenB +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-13 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.168755180E09 +++$+++ Yours,  +++$+++ Yours, [[User:JoergenB|JoergenB]] 22:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
5044 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5043 +++$+++ 5043 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.168849320E09 +++$+++ No, except that because it is in quotes, the actual title of the work is probably ''Danish Ballads''.   +++$+++ :No, except that because it is in quotes, the actual title of the work is probably ''Danish Ballads''.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 00:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
5045 +++$+++ JoergenB +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5043 +++$+++ 5044 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.168899960E09 +++$+++ OK, I separated a [[List of the Child Ballads]], and added || (i.e., 'parallel') information for [[The Twa Sisters]]. What do you think?-- +++$+++ ::OK, I separated a [[List of the Child Ballads]], and added || (i.e., 'parallel') information for [[The Twa Sisters]]. What do you think?--[[User:JoergenB|JoergenB]] 14:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
5046 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5043 +++$+++ 5045 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.168942620E09 +++$+++ Looks good!   +++$+++ :::Looks good!  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 02:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
5047 +++$+++ JoergenB +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5043 +++$+++ 5043 +++$+++ 2007-02-15 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.171597860E09 +++$+++ I got a letter from {{user|Utgard Loki}}; see [[User talk:JoergenB#The Types of the Scandinavian Medieval Ballad]]; who seems to be rather interested in the old ballads, and in some ballad collections; referring to the [[Bagford Ballads]], which I never have heard of. Perhaps we should make some un-tabelled, rather raw list of '''all''' old collections we know of or have seen references to, with or without wiki articles?  To begin with, just for 'our own use', on a discussion page ([[Talk:List of folk song collections]]?) or on a Wikipedia: page somewhere?-- +++$+++ * I got a letter from {{user|Utgard Loki}}; see [[User talk:JoergenB#The Types of the Scandinavian Medieval Ballad]]; who seems to be rather interested in the old ballads, and in some ballad collections; referring to the [[Bagford Ballads]], which I never have heard of. Perhaps we should make some un-tabelled, rather raw list of '''all''' old collections we know of or have seen references to, with or without wiki articles?  To begin with, just for 'our own use', on a discussion page ([[Talk:List of folk song collections]]?) or on a Wikipedia: page somewhere?--[[User:JoergenB|JoergenB]] 19:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

267188 +++$+++ Admiral Norton +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267188 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-28 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.191009480E09 +++$+++ Why did you list Ar\u017eano as a village close to Zagreb? It's in Dalmatia.  +++$+++ Why did you list Aržano as a village close to Zagreb? It's in Dalmatia. [[User:Admiral Norton|Admiral Norton]] 12:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
267189 +++$+++ Timotab +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267188 +++$+++ 267188 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.191010440E09 +++$+++ Please note that comments to a user should go on their talk page, not their userpage, like [[User talk:Admiral Norton]].  Regards.&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ :Please note that comments to a user should go on their talk page, not their userpage, like [[User talk:Admiral Norton]].  Regards.&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Timotab|Timotab]] [[User_talk:Timotab|<sup>Timothy (not Tim </sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Timotab|<sup>dagnabbit!)</sup>]] 13:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
267190 +++$+++ Timotab +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267188 +++$+++ 267189 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.191010980E09 +++$+++ Ack.  I apologise.  That did come across a little rude.  I should have double checked, but I wanted to make sure you knew of your mistake.  Are we all good?  &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Ack.  I apologise.  That did come across a little rude.  I should have double checked, but I wanted to make sure you knew of your mistake.  Are we all good?  &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Timotab|Timotab]] [[User_talk:Timotab|<sup>Timothy (not Tim </sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Timotab|<sup>dagnabbit!)</sup>]] 13:23, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

612510 +++$+++ Samsara +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-14 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.166124240E09 +++$+++ I'm concerned that if we try to satisfy all of Mikker's demands before the FAC, someone at the FAC will come up with the exact opposite demands. It can be much better to allow people to butt heads with each other at the FAC.  +++$+++ I'm concerned that if we try to satisfy all of Mikker's demands before the FAC, someone at the FAC will come up with the exact opposite demands. It can be much better to allow people to butt heads with each other at the FAC. [[User:Samsara|Samsara]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Samsara|talk]]&nbsp;<small>•</small>&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Samsara|contribs]]) 11:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
612511 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612510 +++$+++ 612510 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.166124600E09 +++$+++ It's taking me longer than hoped to deal with the points, but they're worth going through. Your tactical point is appreciated \u2013 but it's perhaps worth at least considering the suggestions as quickly as possible. Are you happy with the answer above? I was thinking of changing it to read \"Owen's verdict was unknown until his April review condemned the book.\" ..  +++$+++ :It's taking me longer than hoped to deal with the points, but they're worth going through. Your tactical point is appreciated – but it's perhaps worth at least considering the suggestions as quickly as possible. Are you happy with the answer above? I was thinking of changing it to read "Owen's verdict was unknown until his April review condemned the book." .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 11:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
612512 +++$+++ Samsara +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612510 +++$+++ 612511 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.166127180E09 +++$+++ Yes, that seems a better solution.  +++$+++ ::Yes, that seems a better solution. [[User:Samsara|Samsara]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Samsara|talk]]&nbsp;<small>•</small>&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Samsara|contribs]]) 12:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

267191 +++$+++ Admiral Norton +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267191 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-28 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.191015360E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, if you don't want to make Ar\u017eano an orphan, put it in the article about Split, I suppose it's fairly close.  +++$+++ Mattisse, if you don't want to make Aržano an orphan, put it in the article about Split, I suppose it's fairly close. [[User:Admiral Norton|Admiral Norton]] 14:36, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
267192 +++$+++ Admiral Norton +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267191 +++$+++ 267191 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.191015780E09 +++$+++ Put a link in the Splitsko-dalmatinska \u017eupanija article.  +++$+++ :Put a link in the Splitsko-dalmatinska županija article. [[User:Admiral Norton|Admiral Norton]] 14:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

445349 +++$+++ Naerii +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445349 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-03 09:06:00 +++$+++ 1.215101160E09 +++$+++ Dude. The suspense is killing me. Girl, boy, alien? Inquiring minds want to know.  +++$+++ Dude. The suspense is killing me. Girl, boy, alien? Inquiring minds want to know. [[User:Naerii|Naerii]] 09:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
445350 +++$+++ giggy +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445349 +++$+++ 445349 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.215112680E09 +++$+++ I get the feeling the kid will run for RfA before you do... :-( \u2014''' +++$+++ :I get the feeling the kid will run for RfA before you do... :-( —'''[[user talk:giggy|Giggy]]''' 12:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

5051 +++$+++ Benedict the Moor +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5051 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.171802220E09 +++$+++ Goldfritha, thanks for restoring the mention of those templates to [[WP:RFC]]. Not wanting to edit-war, I had put [[User_talk:Centrx#Your_reversion_on_WP:RFC|a note on Centrx's talk page]] asking for reconsideration, but, since Centrx had apparently logged off for the night, I might have sat the long hours chewing my fingernails to the elbows, making my typing skills even more abysmal, impossible as that may sound. Thus my fingers, hands, wrists, and forearms owe you a great debt of gratitude. Thanks again! --  +++$+++ Goldfritha, thanks for restoring the mention of those templates to [[WP:RFC]]. Not wanting to edit-war, I had put [[User_talk:Centrx#Your_reversion_on_WP:RFC|a note on Centrx's talk page]] asking for reconsideration, but, since Centrx had apparently logged off for the night, I might have sat the long hours chewing my fingernails to the elbows, making my typing skills even more abysmal, impossible as that may sound. Thus my fingers, hands, wrists, and forearms owe you a great debt of gratitude. Thanks again! -- [[User:Benedict the Moor|Ben]] 04:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
5052 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5051 +++$+++ 5051 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.171841220E09 +++$+++ You're welcome -- I just happened to notice the problem in my watchlist.   +++$+++ :You're welcome -- I just happened to notice the problem in my watchlist.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 15:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

267196 +++$+++ DCDuring +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-29 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.191057720E09 +++$+++ So. We meet again. What have you decided to do on the emotion question? The articles ARE a jumble and in my more aggressive and energetic states I am inclined to try to straighten them out a bit, mostly at the article level, not at category level. There are religious types everywhere grabbing psychology topics that are partially religious (mindfulness and ecstasy are examples that come to mind). Armed with my Webster's 3rd, my OED, and my APA dictionary, I can do battle on definitional matters, but I haven't got much depth. I look forward to your thoughts.  +++$+++ So. We meet again. What have you decided to do on the emotion question? The articles ARE a jumble and in my more aggressive and energetic states I am inclined to try to straighten them out a bit, mostly at the article level, not at category level. There are religious types everywhere grabbing psychology topics that are partially religious (mindfulness and ecstasy are examples that come to mind). Armed with my Webster's 3rd, my OED, and my APA dictionary, I can do battle on definitional matters, but I haven't got much depth. I look forward to your thoughts. [[User:DCDuring|DCDuring]] 02:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
267197 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267196 +++$+++ 267196 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.191057840E09 +++$+++ I have decided to do nothing as all I got before was beat up. -- +++$+++ :I have decided to do nothing as all I got before was beat up. --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 02:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

267198 +++$+++ DCDuring +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-29 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.191057720E09 +++$+++ BTW, [[Emotional labor]] didn't turn out too bad as a a piece of social psychology. Shouldn't it also be in the Sociology and maybe even Business areas? The author has asked to get it rated as a good article. Isn't it a good idea to get it B-rated first by Psych or Soc first? Or doesn't that matter?  +++$+++ BTW, [[Emotional labor]] didn't turn out too bad as a a piece of social psychology. Shouldn't it also be in the Sociology and maybe even Business areas? The author has asked to get it rated as a good article. Isn't it a good idea to get it B-rated first by Psych or Soc first? Or doesn't that matter? [[User:DCDuring|DCDuring]] 02:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
267199 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267198 +++$+++ 267198 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.191058200E09 +++$+++ Yes, the article looks very  good. It is a step up, in my opinion, to get it out of psychology and into some legitimate categories. My impression is that Social Psychology is better. It does not attract so many wackos. -- +++$+++ :Yes, the article looks very  good. It is a step up, in my opinion, to get it out of psychology and into some legitimate categories. My impression is that Social Psychology is better. It does not attract so many wackos. --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 02:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
267200 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267198 +++$+++ 267199 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.191058920E09 +++$+++ Getting rated for a Good Article does not involve a discipline. You just nominate it to be rated for Good Article status and the editors there give you feedback on MoS issues and such. I don't think the rating matters for GA. In any event, you can change the ratings yourself e.g. rate it as Start, say.  The categories you have it in are good.   And you should sort through the business categories and see if some are appropriate. I'm sure some are. Is there no Organizational Psychology? The article looks very professional. And it is interesting. Good work! -- +++$+++ ::Getting rated for a Good Article does not involve a discipline. You just nominate it to be rated for Good Article status and the editors there give you feedback on MoS issues and such. I don't think the rating matters for GA. In any event, you can change the ratings yourself e.g. rate it as Start, say.  The categories you have it in are good.   And you should sort through the business categories and see if some are appropriate. I'm sure some are. Is there no Organizational Psychology? The article looks very professional. And it is interesting. Good work! --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 02:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
267201 +++$+++ DCDuring +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267198 +++$+++ 267200 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.191061080E09 +++$+++ BTW, it *really* isn't my article. I wish I could take credit for it, other than encouraging the person who did the work. An Israeli academic, I believe.  +++$+++ :::BTW, it *really* isn't my article. I wish I could take credit for it, other than encouraging the person who did the work. An Israeli academic, I believe. [[User:DCDuring|DCDuring]] 03:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

5056 +++$+++ SusanLesch +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-04 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.173067320E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | To Goldfritha, for answering all comers during FAC review and making [[Fairy tale]] a featured article. Well done! - +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | To Goldfritha, for answering all comers during FAC review and making [[Fairy tale]] a featured article. Well done! -[[User:Susanlesch|Susanlesch]] 20:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
5057 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5056 +++$+++ 5056 +++$+++ 2007-03-05 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.173105960E09 +++$+++ Ya beat me to it...;) cheers,   +++$+++ :Ya beat me to it...;) cheers,  [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] | [[User talk:Casliber|talk]]  |  [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]] 06:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
5058 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5056 +++$+++ 5057 +++$+++ 2007-03-07 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.173267480E09 +++$+++ Thank you both. :D   +++$+++ ::Thank you both. :D  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 03:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

267202 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267202 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-29 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.191060540E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for your feedback. I saw that nobody was really keen to grasp the nettle of sorting this out once and for all, so I just went ahead and started. I'd be grateful if you will keep an eye on this and related pages to make sure I'm neither treading on toes nor losing relevant information. From my limited experience of Project:Law so far, my impression is that it's a bit of a mess, and this is largely due to (i) although this is en:Wiki, the laws are difficult to make cohabit and (ii) nobody else seems to be very active at present in working up the articles. If you don't have time, that's OK, I'll just get on with it. Regards, -- +++$+++ Thanks very much for your feedback. I saw that nobody was really keen to grasp the nettle of sorting this out once and for all, so I just went ahead and started. I'd be grateful if you will keep an eye on this and related pages to make sure I'm neither treading on toes nor losing relevant information. From my limited experience of Project:Law so far, my impression is that it's a bit of a mess, and this is largely due to (i) although this is en:Wiki, the laws are difficult to make cohabit and (ii) nobody else seems to be very active at present in working up the articles. If you don't have time, that's OK, I'll just get on with it. Regards, --[[User:Rodhullandemu|Rodhullandemu]] 03:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
267203 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267202 +++$+++ 267202 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.191061380E09 +++$+++ I do keep my eye on it and will continue. Actually, it is an advantage if nobody else is active, because those are the times you can actually get something done. When a few others see that you are serious, hopefully they will help. I have waded into a few of the sanity\/competency articles and just straightened out hopelessly inaccurate information without bothering with references. But I do have them. People are muddled in their thinking about those issues. I rewrote the Forensic psychology article in a day because I was so fed up. And to my surprise, everyone else just backed off. So I would urge you to go ahead and do what you think is needed. -- +++$+++ :I do keep my eye on it and will continue. Actually, it is an advantage if nobody else is active, because those are the times you can actually get something done. When a few others see that you are serious, hopefully they will help. I have waded into a few of the sanity/competency articles and just straightened out hopelessly inaccurate information without bothering with references. But I do have them. People are muddled in their thinking about those issues. I rewrote the Forensic psychology article in a day because I was so fed up. And to my surprise, everyone else just backed off. So I would urge you to go ahead and do what you think is needed. --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 03:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

5059 +++$+++ Deor +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-14 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.173859920E09 +++$+++ I've never nominated an AfD before, and the procedure looks rather daunting. Would you be willing to do it? If not, I guess I'll take a stab at it. Let me know on my Talk page, please.  +++$+++ I've never nominated an AfD before, and the procedure looks rather daunting. Would you be willing to do it? If not, I guess I'll take a stab at it. Let me know on my Talk page, please. [[User:Deor|Deor]] 01:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
5060 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5059 +++$+++ 5059 +++$+++ 2007-03-14 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.173862500E09 +++$+++ It's up.  You can go comment. 0:)   +++$+++ :It's up.  You can go comment. 0:)  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 01:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
5061 +++$+++ Deor +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5059 +++$+++ 5060 +++$+++ 2007-03-14 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.173864540E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ ::Thank you. [[User:Deor|Deor]] 02:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

529348 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-02 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.207187940E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you are archiving some of this year's discussion. Thanks for that! Do you think you might be able to also create archived versions of the AFMP? I think someone did so for last year but this years is now gone, near as I can tell. Unless I was looking in the wrong place. I'm thinking that since this is now a 3 year old tradition, an archive structure that didn't just use the standard archive box might be better ... some sort of embedded template that all the talk pages carry that shows, by year, the main page, the main page talk, the DYK talk pate, the FA talk page, etc. It might be a bit much to do but might also avoid some rediscovery\/reinvention each year. I noticed this because my blog link to yesterday's main page is already stale and I was trying to find what to link to... what do you think? ++ +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you are archiving some of this year's discussion. Thanks for that! Do you think you might be able to also create archived versions of the AFMP? I think someone did so for last year but this years is now gone, near as I can tell. Unless I was looking in the wrong place. I'm thinking that since this is now a 3 year old tradition, an archive structure that didn't just use the standard archive box might be better ... some sort of embedded template that all the talk pages carry that shows, by year, the main page, the main page talk, the DYK talk pate, the FA talk page, etc. It might be a bit much to do but might also avoid some rediscovery/reinvention each year. I noticed this because my blog link to yesterday's main page is already stale and I was trying to find what to link to... what do you think? ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 18:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
529349 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529348 +++$+++ 529348 +++$+++ 2008-04-02 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.207191060E09 +++$+++ Good idea. I'll look into it. I did some archiving last year, so I did the same thing this year. So 2008 was the third year (2006, 2007, 2008). I didn't know that. I made a checklist for myself below, feel free to expand.  +++$+++ :Good idea. I'll look into it. I did some archiving last year, so I did the same thing this year. So 2008 was the third year (2006, 2007, 2008). I didn't know that. I made a checklist for myself below, feel free to expand. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 19:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
529350 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529348 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-02 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.207198500E09 +++$+++ K! Did. Thx. ++ +++$+++ :::K! Did. Thx. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 21:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

5063 +++$+++ Remiguisburg +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5063 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-24 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.174797540E09 +++$+++ I'm very sorry for the protocol violation.  I was trying to get to this page and didn't find it.  Your user page said that you are not very communicative, so I thought you might not have a user talk page and did not keep looking long enough (obviously).  I'm still trying to get used to the navigation here.  Please don't hold it against me as rudeness or sabotage, just ignorance (or hopeless stupidity, if you prefer).  I am trying to avoid making mistakes and only wanted more clarification of why we should not capitalize \"Gods\".  Anyway, the Faroe stamps at Ragnarok were very cool.  Again, my heartfelt apologies.  +++$+++ I'm very sorry for the protocol violation.  I was trying to get to this page and didn't find it.  Your user page said that you are not very communicative, so I thought you might not have a user talk page and did not keep looking long enough (obviously).  I'm still trying to get used to the navigation here.  Please don't hold it against me as rudeness or sabotage, just ignorance (or hopeless stupidity, if you prefer).  I am trying to avoid making mistakes and only wanted more clarification of why we should not capitalize "Gods".  Anyway, the Faroe stamps at Ragnarok were very cool.  Again, my heartfelt apologies. [[User:Remiguisburg|Remiguisburg]] 21:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
5064 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5063 +++$+++ 5063 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.174976400E09 +++$+++ I put the explanation in my edit summary:  common noun.   +++$+++ :I put the explanation in my edit summary:  common noun.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 23:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

5065 +++$+++ Harry Stoteles +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5065 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-26 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.174957980E09 +++$+++ Could you give me more specification or where to find the text by '''Schwartz''' on the direct link with Asia Minor?  +++$+++ Could you give me more specification or where to find the text by '''Schwartz''' on the direct link with Asia Minor? [[User:Harry Stoteles|Harry Stoteles]] 18:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
5066 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5065 +++$+++ 5065 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.174976160E09 +++$+++ The wonders of cut-and-paste.  That comes directly from the Catholic Encyclopedia.  You can find the link at the bottom of the article, and it has more info.   +++$+++ :The wonders of cut-and-paste.  That comes directly from the Catholic Encyclopedia.  You can find the link at the bottom of the article, and it has more info.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 23:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

267210 +++$+++ GregorB +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-30 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.191219420E09 +++$+++ I don't have anything to do with this \"Abundance theory\" article; I may have edited it, but I certainly didn't create it, so your warning went to the wrong person...  +++$+++ I don't have anything to do with this "Abundance theory" article; I may have edited it, but I certainly didn't create it, so your warning went to the wrong person... [[User:GregorB|GregorB]] 23:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
267211 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267210 +++$+++ 267210 +++$+++ 2007-09-30 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.191219600E09 +++$+++ Doesn't matter. It's been deleted.  -- +++$+++ :Doesn't matter. It's been deleted.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 23:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

5067 +++$+++ Harmil +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-31 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.175329260E09 +++$+++ Your reversion to [[Magic item]][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Magic_item&curid=2201217&diff=119165616&oldid=119051710] didn't quite make sense to me. These are very specific examples such as the flying carpet and seven-league boots. Clearly these aren't general categories. So, why the attachment to the word \"types\"? Also, what was wrong with the rest of the text? - +++$+++ Your reversion to [[Magic item]][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Magic_item&curid=2201217&diff=119165616&oldid=119051710] didn't quite make sense to me. These are very specific examples such as the flying carpet and seven-league boots. Clearly these aren't general categories. So, why the attachment to the word "types"? Also, what was wrong with the rest of the text? -[[User:Harmil|Harmil]] 01:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
5068 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5067 +++$+++ 5067 +++$+++ 2007-03-31 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.175329920E09 +++$+++ Those types are very general, encompassing a great many magical items, with a great deal of variety, under their rubrics.   +++$+++ :Those types are very general, encompassing a great many magical items, with a great deal of variety, under their rubrics.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 01:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

267212 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267212 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-01 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.191228060E09 +++$+++ You are not an admin yet are you?  Do you want it?  I think even if I were worthy, it would be too likely to lead to me sitting here when I should be doing something more active for me to take it lol. +++$+++ You are not an admin yet are you?  Do you want it?  I think even if I were worthy, it would be too likely to lead to me sitting here when I should be doing something more active for me to take it lol.[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 01:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
267213 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267212 +++$+++ 267212 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.191228360E09 +++$+++ No thanks. As a group, I do not like or respect them. They spend most of their time arguing among themselves. I have a low tolerance for that sort of bickering and nitpicking. I'd rather just edit. But thanks for the thought. (And I am glad that I have met you!) -- +++$+++ :No thanks. As a group, I do not like or respect them. They spend most of their time arguing among themselves. I have a low tolerance for that sort of bickering and nitpicking. I'd rather just edit. But thanks for the thought. (And I am glad that I have met you!) --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 01:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
267214 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267212 +++$+++ 267213 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.191234960E09 +++$+++ lol do you think they mostly spend time bickering amongst themselves?  I thought it was spending their time abusing their power over the rest of us they enjoyed.:) +++$+++ ::lol do you think they mostly spend time bickering amongst themselves?  I thought it was spending their time abusing their power over the rest of us they enjoyed.:)[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 03:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

5069 +++$+++ Arcayne +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-17 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.176849720E09 +++$+++ I've been noticing some good material being added by yourself (I aprticularly like the bit about RH being an amalgam of whatever the storyteller at the time deems important), but we cannot keep anything that is not cited material. We cannot offer primary references - ie, our own thoughts on the subject, but instead must offere secondary sources: other people's words as they relate to Robin Hood. I think that what you said must have been said by someone else. Until then, however, we cannot keep it, and it has to go. I won't delete the text until this afternoon, giving you a chance to source the material.  +++$+++ I've been noticing some good material being added by yourself (I aprticularly like the bit about RH being an amalgam of whatever the storyteller at the time deems important), but we cannot keep anything that is not cited material. We cannot offer primary references - ie, our own thoughts on the subject, but instead must offere secondary sources: other people's words as they relate to Robin Hood. I think that what you said must have been said by someone else. Until then, however, we cannot keep it, and it has to go. I won't delete the text until this afternoon, giving you a chance to source the material. [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 15:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
5070 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5069 +++$+++ 5069 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.176880260E09 +++$+++ Excuse me?  What are you talking about?  I have been ''editting'' the Robin Hood article for prose flow.  I have not being adding anything -- referenced or not.   +++$+++ :Excuse me?  What are you talking about?  I have been ''editting'' the Robin Hood article for prose flow.  I have not being adding anything -- referenced or not.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 00:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
5071 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5069 +++$+++ 5070 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.176880320E09 +++$+++ And while you're at it -- what is wrong with a \"citation needed\" tag?  No, there is no need to slice out information without references.  Ask for references instead.   +++$+++ ::And while you're at it -- what is wrong with a "citation needed" tag?  No, there is no need to slice out information without references.  Ask for references instead.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 00:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

267215 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-30 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.191202920E09 +++$+++ Oh the article, I hate it so, rant rant, ignore me, I'm having a funny turn and should be prescribed valium lol.  It's just wikistress, I've never really had it before.:)  Sorry, had to let off steam, it's therapeutic lol:) +++$+++ Oh the article, I hate it so, rant rant, ignore me, I'm having a funny turn and should be prescribed valium lol.  It's just wikistress, I've never really had it before.:)  Sorry, had to let off steam, it's therapeutic lol:)[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 18:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
267216 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267215 +++$+++ 267215 +++$+++ 2007-09-30 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.191205260E09 +++$+++ Maybe a harvesting of  S. M. Sullivan's organs is in order?  -- +++$+++ :Maybe a harvesting of  S. M. Sullivan's organs is in order?  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
267217 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267215 +++$+++ 267216 +++$+++ 2007-09-30 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.191205560E09 +++$+++ Lol he shouldn't have come off his medication against medical advice.:) +++$+++ ::Lol he shouldn't have come off his medication against medical advice.:)[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 19:26, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

529360 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-07 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.207618320E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Royal; I added that over on [[WP:FCDW]] so we can schedule it in, still unsure what we're doing on the 14th.   +++$+++ Thanks, Royal; I added that over on [[WP:FCDW]] so we can schedule it in, still unsure what we're doing on the 14th.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
529361 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529360 +++$+++ 529360 +++$+++ 2008-04-21 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.208845320E09 +++$+++ Aiming for May 5 for the Dispatch, unless something comes up (like the 2000th promotion :-)  Please tune in to the talk page at [[WP:FCDW]] for discussion about whether the 5th will work out for you.   +++$+++ :Aiming for May 5 for the Dispatch, unless something comes up (like the 2000th promotion :-)  Please tune in to the talk page at [[WP:FCDW]] for discussion about whether the 5th will work out for you.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

5074 +++$+++ KNHaw +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-04 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.178323260E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:KNHaw|<font face="comic sans ms"><font color="SeaGreen"><i><b>KNHaw</b></i></font></font>]] <font color="SeaGreen">[[User talk:KNHaw|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]</font> 17:01, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
5075 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5074 +++$+++ 5074 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.178414640E09 +++$+++ It can be hard, finding references.  The only thing I can recommend is hunting through books on comics; the oddest one might have a reference.  Find out what Dewey Decimal numbers are for comics, and check the index for the books there.   +++$+++ :It can be hard, finding references.  The only thing I can recommend is hunting through books on comics; the oddest one might have a reference.  Find out what Dewey Decimal numbers are for comics, and check the index for the books there.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 18:24, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
5076 +++$+++ KNHaw +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5074 +++$+++ 5075 +++$+++ 2007-05-06 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.178439180E09 +++$+++ Thanks -- +++$+++ ::Thanks --[[User:KNHaw|<font face="comic sans ms"><font color="SeaGreen"><i><b>KNHaw</b></i></font></font>]] <font color="SeaGreen">[[User talk:KNHaw|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]</font> 01:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

5077 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-05 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.178417460E09 +++$+++ Dear Goldfritha, I may have misunderstood the concept of [[Fairy godmother]] and I have nothing about being [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fairy_godmother&diff=prev&oldid=128472656 reverted] if I make a mistake. However, in your summary you wrote ''rv insertion of wildly unsuitable information'', and since you make such strong an exclamation, I have to ask you about it. The article itself says: ''The fairy godmother has her roots in the figures of the Fates'', and the inserted examples dealt with supernatural ladies who arrive at the birth of the protagonist and keep influencing his or her life. Could you please inform me as to why you consider the connection ''widely unsuitable''?-- +++$+++ Dear Goldfritha, I may have misunderstood the concept of [[Fairy godmother]] and I have nothing about being [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fairy_godmother&diff=prev&oldid=128472656 reverted] if I make a mistake. However, in your summary you wrote ''rv insertion of wildly unsuitable information'', and since you make such strong an exclamation, I have to ask you about it. The article itself says: ''The fairy godmother has her roots in the figures of the Fates'', and the inserted examples dealt with supernatural ladies who arrive at the birth of the protagonist and keep influencing his or her life. Could you please inform me as to why you consider the connection ''widely unsuitable''?--[[User:Berig|Berig]] 19:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
5078 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5077 +++$+++ 5077 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.178422320E09 +++$+++ As for the \"roots\" comment you cited -- birds evolved from dinosaurs.  It would not be suitable to dump a large section on dinosaurs in general into the birds article.   +++$+++ :As for the "roots" comment you cited -- birds evolved from dinosaurs.  It would not be suitable to dump a large section on dinosaurs in general into the birds article.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 20:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
5079 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5077 +++$+++ 5078 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.178424540E09 +++$+++ In order to explain my addition of the text. I thought and think that the examples are good cases of the transition of pagan Fates into the tradition of fairy godmothers, or to use your metaphor: examples of archaeopteryx and feathered dinosaurs in a bird article. Anyway, it does not matter much. If the contribution was not appreciated, I regret having done it.-- +++$+++ ::In order to explain my addition of the text. I thought and think that the examples are good cases of the transition of pagan Fates into the tradition of fairy godmothers, or to use your metaphor: examples of archaeopteryx and feathered dinosaurs in a bird article. Anyway, it does not matter much. If the contribution was not appreciated, I regret having done it.--[[User:Berig|Berig]] 21:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

267223 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-30 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.191220800E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, in regard to [[Hispanic Admirals in the United States Navy]], I fixed the sources and the good news is that it passed GA. The bad news, however is that the same day that it passed User: T Rex went and listed for demotion at [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment]], insisting on the \"original research\" thing. I can't understand him, I believe that he doesn't fully understand the concept. I was wondering if you could help him understand that the article is not \"original research\" and that it is within policy (I don't want you to feel that you must express an opinion, if you don't it'll be O.K. with me). Thank you.  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, in regard to [[Hispanic Admirals in the United States Navy]], I fixed the sources and the good news is that it passed GA. The bad news, however is that the same day that it passed User: T Rex went and listed for demotion at [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment]], insisting on the "original research" thing. I can't understand him, I believe that he doesn't fully understand the concept. I was wondering if you could help him understand that the article is not "original research" and that it is within policy (I don't want you to feel that you must express an opinion, if you don't it'll be O.K. with me). Thank you. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:40, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
267224 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267223 +++$+++ 267223 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.191228780E09 +++$+++ Thank you you for sharing your wisdom.  +++$+++ *Thank you you for sharing your wisdom. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:53, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
267225 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267223 +++$+++ 267223 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.191278220E09 +++$+++ Yes, I agree. I'm going to let it run its course. Besides, it is stressing me out.  +++$+++ :Yes, I agree. I'm going to let it run its course. Besides, it is stressing me out. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 15:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

5081 +++$+++ Stbalbach +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-13 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.179125400E09 +++$+++ Goldfritha, just a suggestion. When adding images, also include information about who created the artwork, where the artwork is from (English, French, etc..), what period (''ca. 14th C''), what medium it was from (tapestry, oil or panel painting etc..), where the artwork is kept (Museum of xyz) along with some text that ties it into the article or section where it is being placed, in such a way that says something new and adds to the article - space is limited and image captions are some of the most powerful mediums for conveying important information about the topic of the article. All of these things also help ensure your image will \"last for the ages\" and not be replaced by other editors some time in the future. --  +++$+++ Goldfritha, just a suggestion. When adding images, also include information about who created the artwork, where the artwork is from (English, French, etc..), what period (''ca. 14th C''), what medium it was from (tapestry, oil or panel painting etc..), where the artwork is kept (Museum of xyz) along with some text that ties it into the article or section where it is being placed, in such a way that says something new and adds to the article - space is limited and image captions are some of the most powerful mediums for conveying important information about the topic of the article. All of these things also help ensure your image will "last for the ages" and not be replaced by other editors some time in the future. -- [[User:Stbalbach|Stbalbach]] 23:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
5082 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5081 +++$+++ 5081 +++$+++ 2007-05-13 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.179125760E09 +++$+++ I do add captions to tie it to the rest of the article.  As for the rest, any user who is interested can look it up in commons -- if the uploader provided it.  If not, well, I don't have it any more than anyone else.   +++$+++ :I do add captions to tie it to the rest of the article.  As for the rest, any user who is interested can look it up in commons -- if the uploader provided it.  If not, well, I don't have it any more than anyone else.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] 23:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

529370 +++$+++ Gonzo_fan2007 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-15 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.208251560E09 +++$+++ Hey Royalbroil, I'm slowly working on the above linked article, and I was wondering if you minded if I uploaded a cropped version of [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/royal_broil\/2179096423\/ this photo] to Commons.  I would of course link to the Flickr page and give credit where it is deserved ;-)  Just wanted to ask before I went ahead and uploaded it, cheers!<span style=\"white-space:nowrap\"><font face=\"Harlow Solid Italic\"> +++$+++ Hey Royalbroil, I'm slowly working on the above linked article, and I was wondering if you minded if I uploaded a cropped version of [http://www.flickr.com/photos/royal_broil/2179096423/ this photo] to Commons.  I would of course link to the Flickr page and give credit where it is deserved ;-)  Just wanted to ask before I went ahead and uploaded it, cheers!<span style="white-space:nowrap"><font face="Harlow Solid Italic">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<font size="2px" color="teal"> « Gonzo fan2007</font>]] ''([[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|talk]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Gonzo_fan2007|contribs]])''</font></span> 02:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
529371 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529370 +++$+++ 529370 +++$+++ 2008-04-15 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.208254980E09 +++$+++ Go for it, of course. Make sure that you grab the original size image of the image from flickr by clicking on the \"All Sizes\" button and then select \"original\". Please add it to Commons category [[:Category:Files by User:Royalbroil from en.wikipedia]].  +++$+++ :Go for it, of course. Make sure that you grab the original size image of the image from flickr by clicking on the "All Sizes" button and then select "original". Please add it to Commons category [[:Category:Files by User:Royalbroil from en.wikipedia]]. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 03:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
529372 +++$+++ Gonzo_fan2007 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529370 +++$+++ 529371 +++$+++ 2008-04-15 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.208261280E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot!  For your reference: [[commons:Image:PackersHoF-edit.jpg]].  I tried to model the page after your other pictures, of course feel free to make any changes you see fit.  Thanks again for the pic!<span style=\"white-space:nowrap\"><font face=\"Harlow Solid Italic\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks a lot!  For your reference: [[commons:Image:PackersHoF-edit.jpg]].  I tried to model the page after your other pictures, of course feel free to make any changes you see fit.  Thanks again for the pic!<span style="white-space:nowrap"><font face="Harlow Solid Italic">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<font size="2px" color="teal"> « Gonzo fan2007</font>]] ''([[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|talk]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Gonzo_fan2007|contribs]])''</font></span> 05:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

267231 +++$+++ DCDuring +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267231 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-03 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.191458700E09 +++$+++ Who is willing to tackle this article? I am very interested in it, but lack depth. I can, at best, provide some time, breadth, enthusiasm, and recourse to my personal library of 10 psych titles on emotion. Do you have any leads on which wikipedians would be willing to focus on this?  +++$+++ Who is willing to tackle this article? I am very interested in it, but lack depth. I can, at best, provide some time, breadth, enthusiasm, and recourse to my personal library of 10 psych titles on emotion. Do you have any leads on which wikipedians would be willing to focus on this? [[User:DCDuring|DCDuring]] 17:45, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
267232 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267231 +++$+++ 267231 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191459060E09 +++$+++ The trouble is, for me, I do not know how to define emotion. I would help you if I could. Besides a dictionary, where is there agreement as to what the word means? Is seems like it is loosely used by various groups meaning feelings, I am guessing, versus cognitions or reasoning.  -- +++$+++ :The trouble is, for me, I do not know how to define emotion. I would help you if I could. Besides a dictionary, where is there agreement as to what the word means? Is seems like it is loosely used by various groups meaning feelings, I am guessing, versus cognitions or reasoning.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:51, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
267233 +++$+++ DCDuring +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267231 +++$+++ 267232 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.191463200E09 +++$+++ There isn't much agreement. It is just way too important an arena to ignore. We really need an overall framework for fitting in divergent perspectives and theories. Emotion should be a main article that encompasses subjective states, behavior, physiology, and neurophysiology. The words \"feeling\" (subjective state), \"mood\", \"affect\" (a near synonym for feeling according to APA), \"affect display\", and even emotional predispositions (personality theory) need to be put in perspective in the emotions article. Self-regulation has a place. The philosophical and literary perspectives need a home to prevent destruction of the main structure of the article. The APA has done us the service of having made some executive decisions about where there is consensus. If the definitions in the APA dictionary are vague, it's because there is no consensus on theory. WP can't have one if the APA doesn't (let alone differences in perspective among groups internationally or among psychologists, cognitive scientists, neuropsyhologists, and psychotherapists).  +++$+++ ::There isn't much agreement. It is just way too important an arena to ignore. We really need an overall framework for fitting in divergent perspectives and theories. Emotion should be a main article that encompasses subjective states, behavior, physiology, and neurophysiology. The words "feeling" (subjective state), "mood", "affect" (a near synonym for feeling according to APA), "affect display", and even emotional predispositions (personality theory) need to be put in perspective in the emotions article. Self-regulation has a place. The philosophical and literary perspectives need a home to prevent destruction of the main structure of the article. The APA has done us the service of having made some executive decisions about where there is consensus. If the definitions in the APA dictionary are vague, it's because there is no consensus on theory. WP can't have one if the APA doesn't (let alone differences in perspective among groups internationally or among psychologists, cognitive scientists, neuropsyhologists, and psychotherapists). [[User:DCDuring|DCDuring]] 19:00, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
267234 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267231 +++$+++ 267233 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.191463500E09 +++$+++ Yes. And the trouble is that pulling all that together involves reading '''philosophy''' articles which I am constitutionally unable to do. My brain starts to spin.  -- +++$+++ :::Yes. And the trouble is that pulling all that together involves reading '''philosophy''' articles which I am constitutionally unable to do. My brain starts to spin.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
267235 +++$+++ DCDuring +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267231 +++$+++ 267234 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.191468900E09 +++$+++ I've been trying to send you something thoughtful, but I keep on losing what I type. Maybe later.  +++$+++ ::::I've been trying to send you something thoughtful, but I keep on losing what I type. Maybe later. [[User:DCDuring|DCDuring]] 20:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
267236 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267231 +++$+++ 267235 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.191469020E09 +++$+++ Well, that's a strange message!  -- +++$+++ :::::Well, that's a strange message!  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 20:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
267237 +++$+++ DCDuring +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267231 +++$+++ 267236 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.191474780E09 +++$+++ WP occasionally loses what I type. If I am interrupted before what I type is complete, I can't save because thought is not complete, but when I later finish my thought I occasionally find that WP gives me an error message, telling me my work is lost. Anyway, I should put it in the Emotion talk page so I can perhaps catch the attention of others as well.  +++$+++ ::::::WP occasionally loses what I type. If I am interrupted before what I type is complete, I can't save because thought is not complete, but when I later finish my thought I occasionally find that WP gives me an error message, telling me my work is lost. Anyway, I should put it in the Emotion talk page so I can perhaps catch the attention of others as well. [[User:DCDuring|DCDuring]] 22:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

5088 +++$+++ Goldfritter +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5088 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-28 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.180393800E09 +++$+++ Ugh. More and more... I thought I was original when I came up with \"Goldfritter,\" but I keep on encountering individuals with similar nicks. Not that you care. Um. Sorry.  +++$+++ Ugh. More and more... I thought I was original when I came up with "Goldfritter," but I keep on encountering individuals with similar nicks. Not that you care. Um. Sorry. [[User:Goldfritter|<font color="gold">Gold</font>]][[User_Talk:Goldfritter|<font color="blue">fritter</font>]] 16:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
5089 +++$+++ Goldfritter +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5088 +++$+++ 5088 +++$+++ 2007-05-28 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.180393860E09 +++$+++ Damn. That was random.  +++$+++ :Damn. That was random. [[User:Goldfritter|<font color="gold">Gold</font>]][[User_Talk:Goldfritter|<font color="blue">fritter</font>]] 16:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

5091 +++$+++ TimNelson +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-04 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.186237500E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ -- [[User:TimNelson|TimNelson]] 07:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
5092 +++$+++  +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5091 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.178754600E09 +++$+++ ''Hi I am leaving you with this barnstar for you to reflect carefully on. I will provide the citation in a few days once you have had the opportunity to consider why I might think that you deserve it. Peace  +++$+++ :*''Hi I am leaving you with this barnstar for you to reflect carefully on. I will provide the citation in a few days once you have had the opportunity to consider why I might think that you deserve it. Peace [[User:Dr Spam (MD)]] 16:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
5093 +++$+++  +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5091 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.178650860E09 +++$+++ ''awesome contribution to this web site! have a lovely barnstar thing  +++$+++ :*''awesome contribution to this web site! have a lovely barnstar thing [[User:Dr Spam (MD)]] 12:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

612518 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612518 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-17 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.166384460E09 +++$+++ Say, lad, would you like a scan (in two parts: A3 sheets are hard to scan) of an 1871 Illustrated London News article on Darwin and the Descent of man?  +++$+++ Say, lad, would you like a scan (in two parts: A3 sheets are hard to scan) of an 1871 Illustrated London News article on Darwin and the Descent of man? [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 11:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
612519 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612518 +++$+++ 612518 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.166407320E09 +++$+++ Sounds good! ..  +++$+++ :Sounds good! .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

529383 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-20 08:45:00 +++$+++ 1.208706300E09 +++$+++ Is ready, if you're active.  +++$+++ Is ready, if you're active. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 08:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
529384 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529383 +++$+++ 529383 +++$+++ 2008-04-20 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.208719080E09 +++$+++ That was the middle of the night here in the U.S., and I was sleeping soundly.  +++$+++ :That was the middle of the night here in the U.S., and I was sleeping soundly. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 12:18, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
529385 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529383 +++$+++ 529384 +++$+++ 2008-04-21 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.208781540E09 +++$+++ Oh sorry, I usually just notify admins who have recently posted. I must have misread the timestamp :)  +++$+++ ::Oh sorry, I usually just notify admins who have recently posted. I must have misread the timestamp :) [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 05:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

267240 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-05 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.191579300E09 +++$+++ Had you acted civilly and explained your objections on the Talk page, you could have saved yourself considerable embarrassment at the AfD discussion. In any event, I'm glad you got the come-uppance you deserved. Maybe next time you'll act in good faith. \u2014  +++$+++ Had you acted civilly and explained your objections on the Talk page, you could have saved yourself considerable embarrassment at the AfD discussion. In any event, I'm glad you got the come-uppance you deserved. Maybe next time you'll act in good faith. — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]]) 03:15, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
267241 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267240 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.191580200E09 +++$+++ I am sorry that you consider slaves in the 1850's equivalent to problem children of today. [[Oppositional defiant disorder]] (a diagnosis for '''children''' only) is demeaning to African American slaves, just as mental health professions consider that diagnosis demeaning to children today. Further, you are saying African American slaves are equivalent to children. If you had shown any interest in improving the article except replacing a demeaning link about African Americans my attitude toward the article would have been completely different. The article has existed since April 2005 and is basically a quote farm and copy\/paste.  You are not helping to improve the article.  Further, you are unwilling to learn enough about the mental health system to make accurate rather than demeaning statements. -- +++$+++ ::I am sorry that you consider slaves in the 1850's equivalent to problem children of today. [[Oppositional defiant disorder]] (a diagnosis for '''children''' only) is demeaning to African American slaves, just as mental health professions consider that diagnosis demeaning to children today. Further, you are saying African American slaves are equivalent to children. If you had shown any interest in improving the article except replacing a demeaning link about African Americans my attitude toward the article would have been completely different. The article has existed since April 2005 and is basically a quote farm and copy/paste.  You are not helping to improve the article.  Further, you are unwilling to learn enough about the mental health system to make accurate rather than demeaning statements. --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 03:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
267242 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267240 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.191580440E09 +++$+++ I was not embarrassed by the AFD. I acknowledged at the beginning that I wanted feedback. Please read the AFD to remember what I wrote. And please do no project your own feelings on me. Perhaps you would have been embarrassed but that is you, not me.  -- +++$+++ :::I was not embarrassed by the AFD. I acknowledged at the beginning that I wanted feedback. Please read the AFD to remember what I wrote. And please do no project your own feelings on me. Perhaps you would have been embarrassed but that is you, not me.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 03:34, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

267243 +++$+++ Cyborg Ninja +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267243 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-05 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.191581100E09 +++$+++ I completely agree with [[User:Malik Shabazz]]. You were not interested in improving the article and several users showed you why your nomination was faulty. In no way did you act like you were interested in feedback, especially when you ignored that feedback and continued to use the same ridiculous arguments over again. First off, you continually act like [[User:Malik Shabazz]] was the main and only author of the article, when he himself has told you he only edited it once. Second, you tagged the article multiple times rather than contribute to it, and then gave editors 3 hours around midnight ET before nominating it for deletion, and thirdly you are assuming bad faith again as I pointed out by claiming that [[User:Malik Shabazz]] thinks African-Americans are the equivalent of children. Like Malik said, you were merely angry at him for reverting your edit and took a personal vendetta against the article because of it, thereby violating [[WP:POINT]] which you denied on my Talk page. There is other evidence, but that should make it obvious. You have indeed embarrassed yourself. -  +++$+++ I completely agree with [[User:Malik Shabazz]]. You were not interested in improving the article and several users showed you why your nomination was faulty. In no way did you act like you were interested in feedback, especially when you ignored that feedback and continued to use the same ridiculous arguments over again. First off, you continually act like [[User:Malik Shabazz]] was the main and only author of the article, when he himself has told you he only edited it once. Second, you tagged the article multiple times rather than contribute to it, and then gave editors 3 hours around midnight ET before nominating it for deletion, and thirdly you are assuming bad faith again as I pointed out by claiming that [[User:Malik Shabazz]] thinks African-Americans are the equivalent of children. Like Malik said, you were merely angry at him for reverting your edit and took a personal vendetta against the article because of it, thereby violating [[WP:POINT]] which you denied on my Talk page. There is other evidence, but that should make it obvious. You have indeed embarrassed yourself. - [[User:Cyborg Ninja|Cyborg Ninja]] 03:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
267244 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267243 +++$+++ 267243 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.191582000E09 +++$+++ Do you really want to go over and over all this again? Does it make you feel better to rant? I would have been grateful if the article had been improved. But as soon as I saw that all the article's owner was willing to do was revert the removal of a demeaning link about African Americans, I realized no one was interested in improving the article. I would have hoped some Wikipedia pride would have kicked in and people would have responded positively  -- that frequently does happen in an AFD like this one -- and as you apparently do not know, is one of the primary reasons for bringing an AFD rather than deletion. But I did succeed in getting the objectionable link removed, something the editor arbitrarily reverted me on  before. Sometimes on Wikipedia, improvements come one baby step at a time as in [[Drapetomania]]. Maybe in a couple of years more, someone will get up the energy to clean it up, cite references, remove the POV, and remove the quote farm. At least it got some attention so hopefully people like you, since you are so vehement and insistent in you point, will help clean it.  Good for you if you do.  -- +++$+++ : Do you really want to go over and over all this again? Does it make you feel better to rant? I would have been grateful if the article had been improved. But as soon as I saw that all the article's owner was willing to do was revert the removal of a demeaning link about African Americans, I realized no one was interested in improving the article. I would have hoped some Wikipedia pride would have kicked in and people would have responded positively  -- that frequently does happen in an AFD like this one -- and as you apparently do not know, is one of the primary reasons for bringing an AFD rather than deletion. But I did succeed in getting the objectionable link removed, something the editor arbitrarily reverted me on  before. Sometimes on Wikipedia, improvements come one baby step at a time as in [[Drapetomania]]. Maybe in a couple of years more, someone will get up the energy to clean it up, cite references, remove the POV, and remove the quote farm. At least it got some attention so hopefully people like you, since you are so vehement and insistent in you point, will help clean it.  Good for you if you do.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 04:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
267245 +++$+++ Cyborg Ninja +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267243 +++$+++ 267244 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.191582720E09 +++$+++ No one is going to clean up the article for your own good. We do it because that is part of Wikipedia's philosophy and we wish to see the site improved. You clearly are a regular contributor to this site, and yet I see childish behavior on your part here. You have repeatedly ignored other users' arguments even if they are made to be as clear as day. AfD is not used to get an article to be improved. You can use the cleanup tag for that. Because you have admitted a clear policy violation by nominating articles for deletion that you yourself know don't qualify to be deleted, I will likely contact any administrator to review your conduct. -  +++$+++ ::No one is going to clean up the article for your own good. We do it because that is part of Wikipedia's philosophy and we wish to see the site improved. You clearly are a regular contributor to this site, and yet I see childish behavior on your part here. You have repeatedly ignored other users' arguments even if they are made to be as clear as day. AfD is not used to get an article to be improved. You can use the cleanup tag for that. Because you have admitted a clear policy violation by nominating articles for deletion that you yourself know don't qualify to be deleted, I will likely contact any administrator to review your conduct. - [[User:Cyborg Ninja|Cyborg Ninja]] 04:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

5101 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5101 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-18 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.282177920E09 +++$+++ Are you by any chance the Fritha I know from [[:science fiction conventions|fantasy\/SF conventions]]? If so, you'll know who this is (to put it mildly), and \"Hi!\"; if not, no harm (but I do hope you get to them, wherever you live). -- +++$+++ Are you by any chance the Fritha I know from [[:science fiction conventions|fantasy/SF conventions]]? If so, you'll know who this is (to put it mildly), and "Hi!"; if not, no harm (but I do hope you get to them, wherever you live). --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  &#x007C;  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 17:32, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
5102 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5101 +++$+++ 5101 +++$+++ 2010-08-21 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.282450200E09 +++$+++ 'fraid not.   +++$+++ :'fraid not.  [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] ([[User talk:Goldfritha#top|talk]]) 21:10, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
5103 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5101 +++$+++ 5101 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.288509180E09 +++$+++ I've also given you reviewer rights; see [[WP:REVIEWER]] and [[Help:Pending changes]] for more information. Regards,  +++$+++ :I've also given you reviewer rights; see [[WP:REVIEWER]] and [[Help:Pending changes]] for more information. Regards, [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 00:13, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

267247 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-05 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.191617400E09 +++$+++ Maybe we need a 'made-up psychiatric shock horror b*llox' arbcom.  And\/or maybe we'll tackle some of them in a bit.:) +++$+++ Maybe we need a 'made-up psychiatric shock horror b*llox' arbcom.  And/or maybe we'll tackle some of them in a bit.:)[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 13:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
267248 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267247 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.191618060E09 +++$+++ You said on my talk page there are more articles nested, also you said about Sully of 'psychiatric abuse' fame that he has a few.  Please could you email me and list the dodgy articles for me, cos I'm thick lol, maybe then I can help out with them a bit or keep an eye on them. +++$+++ ::You said on my talk page there are more articles nested, also you said about Sully of 'psychiatric abuse' fame that he has a few.  Please could you email me and list the dodgy articles for me, cos I'm thick lol, maybe then I can help out with them a bit or keep an eye on them.[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 14:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
267249 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267247 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.191618180E09 +++$+++ Psychiatric shock horror b*llox' category might be a good ideal too!  -- +++$+++ :::Psychiatric shock horror b*llox' category might be a good ideal too!  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

5105 +++$+++ Trafford09 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-30 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.293770580E09 +++$+++ PS Talking of which - minor aside - wonder if you'd been considering {{Archiveme}}?  +++$+++ PS Talking of which - minor aside - wonder if you'd been considering {{Archiveme}}? [[User:Trafford09|Trafford09]] ([[User talk:Trafford09|talk]]) 20:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
5106 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5105 +++$+++ 5105 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.294040400E09 +++$+++ Hmm, no, because I've not been doing much there -- and I'd have to look up how to do it. +++$+++ :Hmm, no, because I've not been doing much there -- and I'd have to look up how to do it.[[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] ([[User talk:Goldfritha#top|talk]]) 23:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
5107 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5105 +++$+++ 5106 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.306704360E09 +++$+++ Hiya, popping in because I saw the request.  If you'd like I could setup an archivebot for the page, and then you won't have to worry about it anymore? -- +++$+++ :: Hiya, popping in because I saw the request.  If you'd like I could setup an archivebot for the page, and then you won't have to worry about it anymore? --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 14:26, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

267250 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-05 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.191620100E09 +++$+++ oooh I just saw the 'psych abuse' article was deleted. I'm surprised to be honest, thought it would be end up being a 'no consensus.'  There is hope after all for wikip lol. +++$+++ oooh I just saw the 'psych abuse' article was deleted. I'm surprised to be honest, thought it would be end up being a 'no consensus.'  There is hope after all for wikip lol.[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 14:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
267251 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267250 +++$+++ 267250 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.191620460E09 +++$+++ Yes, I was surprised too. I withdrew my AFD for [[Drapetomania]] yesterday after I was immediately attacked and harassed. However, I will continue to monitor the article as it pretends to be a psychiatric diagnosis.  -- +++$+++ :Yes, I was surprised too. I withdrew my AFD for [[Drapetomania]] yesterday after I was immediately attacked and harassed. However, I will continue to monitor the article as it pretends to be a psychiatric diagnosis.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

5108 +++$+++ Bytwerk +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5108 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-02 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.294040040E09 +++$+++ But as I said, you've done great things to improve the article, which I was reluctant to do, given the obvious difficulty of citing my own work.  +++$+++ But as I said, you've done great things to improve the article, which I was reluctant to do, given the obvious difficulty of citing my own work. [[User:Bytwerk|Bytwerk]] ([[User talk:Bytwerk|talk]]) 23:34, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
5109 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5108 +++$+++ 5108 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.294040340E09 +++$+++ Hmm. I doublechecked that -- and I think someone else added it.  (Which can be hard to tell looking at the history!)  +++$+++ :Hmm. I doublechecked that -- and I think someone else added it.  (Which can be hard to tell looking at the history!) [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] ([[User talk:Goldfritha#top|talk]]) 23:39, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
5110 +++$+++ Bytwerk +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5108 +++$+++ 5109 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.294040520E09 +++$+++ Makes sense \u2014 those edit histories can get confusing. I'll fix it eventually if you don't get around to it.  +++$+++ ::Makes sense — those edit histories can get confusing. I'll fix it eventually if you don't get around to it. [[User:Bytwerk|Bytwerk]] ([[User talk:Bytwerk|talk]]) 23:42, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

267253 +++$+++ John254 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-06 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.191675720E09 +++$+++ [[User:Cyborg Ninja|Cyborg Ninja]] and [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] have filed an unwarranted request for comment against you, and contend that you need not be notified of the discussion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Cyborg_Ninja&diff=prev&oldid=162612130].  +++$+++ [[User:Cyborg Ninja|Cyborg Ninja]] and [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] have filed an unwarranted request for comment against you, and contend that you need not be notified of the discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cyborg_Ninja&diff=prev&oldid=162612130]. [[User:John254|John254]] 06:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
267254 +++$+++ Cyborg Ninja +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267253 +++$+++ 267253 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.191678000E09 +++$+++ I hadn't noticed that the template had a \"Response\" section at the time. Just an \"Outside views.\" It would have been wiser for you to have used that as an example since the RfC guidelines page is ambiguous. Also, bear in mind the previous version of the RfC that I made said that I was planning on notifying the user. -  +++$+++ :I hadn't noticed that the template had a "Response" section at the time. Just an "Outside views." It would have been wiser for you to have used that as an example since the RfC guidelines page is ambiguous. Also, bear in mind the previous version of the RfC that I made said that I was planning on notifying the user. - [[User:Cyborg Ninja|Cyborg Ninja]] 06:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
267255 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267253 +++$+++ 267253 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.191733680E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Drapetomania&diff=prev&oldid=162739865] -- +++$+++ *[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Drapetomania&diff=prev&oldid=162739865] --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 22:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

529398 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-21 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.208831760E09 +++$+++ I started articles on the remaining [[Apostle Islands]] and I used the Wisconsin-geo-stubs for the articles. It had to be done.Thanks- +++$+++ I started articles on the remaining [[Apostle Islands]] and I used the Wisconsin-geo-stubs for the articles. It had to be done.Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 19:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
529399 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529398 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.209070920E09 +++$+++ I completed the articles about the [[Apostle Islands]]-they are geo-stubs.Initially I was just going to do just [[Stockton Island]] but decided to do all the Apostle Islands. In addition I started article on 3 islands off Door County that had lighthouses on them.Thanks- +++$+++ ::I completed the articles about the [[Apostle Islands]]-they are geo-stubs.Initially I was just going to do just [[Stockton Island]] but decided to do all the Apostle Islands. In addition I started article on 3 islands off Door County that had lighthouses on them.Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
529400 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529398 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.209515520E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your comments. I too agree that the Galena, Illinois area is beautiful. I am very interested in the Washburn family-Elihu Washburn who lived in Galena abd of course Governor Cadwallader Washburn who lived in La Crosse, Wisconsin and who helped founded my home away from home-the La Crosse Public Library! Many thanks- +++$+++ ::Many thanks for your comments. I too agree that the Galena, Illinois area is beautiful. I am very interested in the Washburn family-Elihu Washburn who lived in Galena abd of course Governor Cadwallader Washburn who lived in La Crosse, Wisconsin and who helped founded my home away from home-the La Crosse Public Library! Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 17:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

5111 +++$+++ Cygnis insignis +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5111 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-24 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.298576280E09 +++$+++ I have been populating [[:Category:Collectors of fairy tales]], which I see you created, and every time I do I think [[:Category:Collectors of folklore]] might be a better name. 'Fairy tales' excludes collectors of material that might not be described that way, as a stem of children's literature, but I think that is more to do with how it might be presented when published. This sort of field research is interesting, probably deserving of an article, including that would remove the need to have a definition of the cat's members. What do you think?  +++$+++ I have been populating [[:Category:Collectors of fairy tales]], which I see you created, and every time I do I think [[:Category:Collectors of folklore]] might be a better name. 'Fairy tales' excludes collectors of material that might not be described that way, as a stem of children's literature, but I think that is more to do with how it might be presented when published. This sort of field research is interesting, probably deserving of an article, including that would remove the need to have a definition of the cat's members. What do you think? [[User talk:Cygnis insignis|cygnis insignis]] 11:38, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
5112 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5111 +++$+++ 5111 +++$+++ 2011-02-26 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.298720820E09 +++$+++ Yes, exactly it excludes those whose material is not fairy tales -- that was the intention.  What about your proposed \"collectors of folklore\" diffentiates it from \"folklorists\"?  And if there is such a difference, why not just create a different, additional category?  +++$+++ :Yes, exactly it excludes those whose material is not fairy tales -- that was the intention.  What about your proposed "collectors of folklore" diffentiates it from "folklorists"?  And if there is such a difference, why not just create a different, additional category? [[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] ([[User talk:Goldfritha#top|talk]]) 03:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

5113 +++$+++ Nick-D +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-13 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.300016940E09 +++$+++ I've had this article watchlisted for a while, and have been really impressed with your recent expansion of it. Keep up the good work!  +++$+++ I've had this article watchlisted for a while, and have been really impressed with your recent expansion of it. Keep up the good work! [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 04:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
5114 +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ Goldfritha +++$+++ 5113 +++$+++ 5113 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.300018680E09 +++$+++ Glad you like it! +++$+++ :Glad you like it![[User:Goldfritha|Goldfritha]] ([[User talk:Goldfritha#top|talk]]) 05:18, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

267259 +++$+++ DCDuring +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267259 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-06 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.191737640E09 +++$+++ I'm becoming more \"live and let live\", but a little policing helps. I'd be perfectly content if \"compersion\" became a good article. There are a some things that I have started that I am having trouble making progress on. I'd be hurt a bit if they got the deletions that they *may* deserve. The most productive things to do are to make good articles, whatever the starting point. I just find that in my roamings I find apparent outrages often. Sometimes they turn out to be not as bad as I thought (e.g., polyamory). Sometimes they are (e.g., compersion and polyamory terminology article. It really has terminology in the title!!! How much more blatant a violation of WP:not a dictionary can there be?  +++$+++ I'm becoming more "live and let live", but a little policing helps. I'd be perfectly content if "compersion" became a good article. There are a some things that I have started that I am having trouble making progress on. I'd be hurt a bit if they got the deletions that they *may* deserve. The most productive things to do are to make good articles, whatever the starting point. I just find that in my roamings I find apparent outrages often. Sometimes they turn out to be not as bad as I thought (e.g., polyamory). Sometimes they are (e.g., compersion and polyamory terminology article. It really has terminology in the title!!! How much more blatant a violation of WP:not a dictionary can there be? [[User:DCDuring|DCDuring]] 23:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
267260 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267259 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-07 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.191769500E09 +++$+++ I hope you dont mind my comment because i am that inclusionist mentioned--I saw this by accident. it seem the detagging was because a prod tag had been put on, it seems by mistake, instead of the afd--Im glad to see everyone agrees it needed an afd if it were to be deleted. the current state, by the way, is to try to let it get expanded--Im glad DCD decided to go for that. In my opinion most  dictionary definition articles can be expanded into articles on the concept--the problem is knowing when there is enough to make it feasible, or when it should be held in wikitionary until someone has a chance to start over.  (By the way, usually when I see one at Prod, I dont try to stop it going). I at least ''try'' to distinguish in some rational way. I'd be very grateful, by the way, for some explanation of the etymology of that term--from the sources, it seemed rather arbitrary. ''' +++$+++ ::I hope you dont mind my comment because i am that inclusionist mentioned--I saw this by accident. it seem the detagging was because a prod tag had been put on, it seems by mistake, instead of the afd--Im glad to see everyone agrees it needed an afd if it were to be deleted. the current state, by the way, is to try to let it get expanded--Im glad DCD decided to go for that. In my opinion most  dictionary definition articles can be expanded into articles on the concept--the problem is knowing when there is enough to make it feasible, or when it should be held in wikitionary until someone has a chance to start over.  (By the way, usually when I see one at Prod, I dont try to stop it going). I at least ''try'' to distinguish in some rational way. I'd be very grateful, by the way, for some explanation of the etymology of that term--from the sources, it seemed rather arbitrary. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 08:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

529406 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529406 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-22 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.208893980E09 +++$+++ RB, do we have a page for holding over links for Easter? It's just that someone submitted an article called [[Easter Parade]] a few days ago, I'm happy to run it now but if there's a precedent for holding topical DYKs over for a more appropriate time, we could run it next Easter instead.  +++$+++ RB, do we have a page for holding over links for Easter? It's just that someone submitted an article called [[Easter Parade]] a few days ago, I'm happy to run it now but if there's a precedent for holding topical DYKs over for a more appropriate time, we could run it next Easter instead. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 12:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
529407 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529406 +++$+++ 529406 +++$+++ 2008-04-22 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.208894340E09 +++$+++ Maybe holding articles for a year is a little over the top anyhow. What the heck, I'll run the article now, last Easter wasn't long ago anyway.  +++$+++ :Maybe holding articles for a year is a little over the top anyhow. What the heck, I'll run the article now, last Easter wasn't long ago anyway. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 12:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
529408 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529406 +++$+++ 529407 +++$+++ 2008-04-22 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.208895000E09 +++$+++ I think Lou probably planned to feature it at Easter, but it took him longer to write than he thought. Anyhow, it's a good article and I found it pretty interesting, so it certainly deserves the DYK. Thanks for your input.  +++$+++ ::I think Lou probably planned to feature it at Easter, but it took him longer to write than he thought. Anyhow, it's a good article and I found it pretty interesting, so it certainly deserves the DYK. Thanks for your input. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 13:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

525141 +++$+++ Andrewr47 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525141 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-29 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.162191660E09 +++$+++ hello, i would like to suggest that [[miller fisher syndrome]] redirect to [[guillain-barre syndrome]] as this is a clinical variant and there's not much to write about to deserve a separate page. In addition, both conditions are of the same ICD-9 code and thus should be grouped together. thanks -- +++$+++ hello, i would like to suggest that [[miller fisher syndrome]] redirect to [[guillain-barre syndrome]] as this is a clinical variant and there's not much to write about to deserve a separate page. In addition, both conditions are of the same ICD-9 code and thus should be grouped together. thanks --[[User:Andrewr47|Andrewr47]] 23:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
525142 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525141 +++$+++ 525141 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.162413300E09 +++$+++ OK. -- +++$+++ :OK. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 12:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

5120 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5120 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-11 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.294799280E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page or the project at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants]]. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!  +++$+++ If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page or the project at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants]]. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! [[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 18:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
5121 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5120 +++$+++ 5120 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.294799460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the welcome. :) --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for the welcome. :) --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>'''  18:31, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
5122 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5120 +++$+++ 5121 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.294800120E09 +++$+++ My pleasure. And thank you for working on the neglected ''Musa'' articles! It's great to have so many people who inhabit the various corners of botany on Wikipedia. Keep up the great work.  +++$+++ ::My pleasure. And thank you for working on the neglected ''Musa'' articles! It's great to have so many people who inhabit the various corners of botany on Wikipedia. Keep up the great work. [[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 18:42, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

529409 +++$+++ Vishnava +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-22 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.208899920E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil - I request you to have a look at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Mecca Time]] - I had created this article early today thinking it was significant, but later I found that only a BBC report and a Gulf Times article are the sources of this information - all other sources have picked the BBC article, nothing else. The participants in this conference in question are virtually unknown, and I couldn't find any background information on this idea or controversy. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Vishnava#Mecca_Time I had a discussion with Erechtheus, who had first raised the point, and Johnbod, whose feedback I had requested]. Yet, I feel the best thing to do is to get wider community opinion, and your input will be appreciated. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil - I request you to have a look at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mecca Time]] - I had created this article early today thinking it was significant, but later I found that only a BBC report and a Gulf Times article are the sources of this information - all other sources have picked the BBC article, nothing else. The participants in this conference in question are virtually unknown, and I couldn't find any background information on this idea or controversy. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Vishnava#Mecca_Time I had a discussion with Erechtheus, who had first raised the point, and Johnbod, whose feedback I had requested]. Yet, I feel the best thing to do is to get wider community opinion, and your input will be appreciated. Thanks, [[User:Vishnava|Vishnava]] ([[User talk:Vishnava|talk]]) 14:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
529410 +++$+++ Vishnava +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529409 +++$+++ 529409 +++$+++ 2008-04-22 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.208901420E09 +++$+++ I felt it was the thing to do. Given the opinions of Erechtheus and Johnbod, its possible that I made a mistake, in which case the article has no business being here. Nobody knows who these people are and they can propose just about anything, as I realize in retrospect. Its just that the news was carried by the BBC and was interesting, in context of the current [[Islam]]-related happenings, even though the idea was ridiculous.  +++$+++ :I felt it was the thing to do. Given the opinions of Erechtheus and Johnbod, its possible that I made a mistake, in which case the article has no business being here. Nobody knows who these people are and they can propose just about anything, as I realize in retrospect. Its just that the news was carried by the BBC and was interesting, in context of the current [[Islam]]-related happenings, even though the idea was ridiculous. [[User:Vishnava|Vishnava]] ([[User talk:Vishnava|talk]]) 14:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

267266 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.191834420E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 02:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
267267 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267266 +++$+++ 267266 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.191835140E09 +++$+++ This 'complaint' is not suitable for the bureaucrats' noticeboard, as there is nothing the bureaucrats can do. You would be better served to post at [[WT:RFAR]], or, even better, at the talk page of the specific case. ''' +++$+++ :This 'complaint' is not suitable for the bureaucrats' noticeboard, as there is nothing the bureaucrats can do. You would be better served to post at [[WT:RFAR]], or, even better, at the talk page of the specific case. '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 02:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
267268 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267266 +++$+++ 267267 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.191841380E09 +++$+++ Or Fred's talk page.  +++$+++ ::Or Fred's talk page. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 04:03, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
267269 +++$+++ Chaser +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267266 +++$+++ 267266 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.191845460E09 +++$+++ [[WP:BN]] wasn't really the appropriate venue because bureaucrats don't actually have any power or say in arbitration. If you want to make a generalized complaint about an arbitrator, I would follow Daniel's advice above, although I recommend [[WT:RFAR]] as more appropriate than the case's talk page, since the case has been closed for months.-- +++$+++ :[[WP:BN]] wasn't really the appropriate venue because bureaucrats don't actually have any power or say in arbitration. If you want to make a generalized complaint about an arbitrator, I would follow Daniel's advice above, although I recommend [[WT:RFAR]] as more appropriate than the case's talk page, since the case has been closed for months.--[[User:Chaser|chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|t]] 05:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

122377 +++$+++ stickguy +++$+++ Musimax +++$+++ 122377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-27 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.288225380E09 +++$+++ Any thoughts on the matter? &mdash; <span style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid #0000aa;\"><font face=\"Arial\" style=\"background: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ Any thoughts on the matter? &mdash; <span style="border-bottom: 1px solid #0000aa;"><font face="Arial" style="background: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" color="#000000">[[user:stickguy|stickguy (:^›)&mdash;]]</font></span> || [[user talk:stickguy|talk]] || 17:23, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
122378 +++$+++ stickguy +++$+++ Musimax +++$+++ 122377 +++$+++ 122377 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.288227060E09 +++$+++ Cool, thanks. &mdash; <span style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid #0000aa;\"><font face=\"Arial\" style=\"background: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Cool, thanks. &mdash; <span style="border-bottom: 1px solid #0000aa;"><font face="Arial" style="background: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" color="#000000">[[user:stickguy|stickguy (:^›)&mdash;]]</font></span> || [[user talk:stickguy|talk]] || 17:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
122379 +++$+++ stickguy +++$+++ Musimax +++$+++ 122377 +++$+++ 122378 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.288228140E09 +++$+++ Fair enough - I wasn't entirely sure about it myself at the time; it probably makes more [[WP:NPOV]] sense to keep them separate (but note the links). In process. &mdash; <span style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid #0000aa;\"><font face=\"Arial\" style=\"background: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Fair enough - I wasn't entirely sure about it myself at the time; it probably makes more [[WP:NPOV]] sense to keep them separate (but note the links). In process. &mdash; <span style="border-bottom: 1px solid #0000aa;"><font face="Arial" style="background: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" color="#000000">[[user:stickguy|stickguy (:^›)&mdash;]]</font></span> || [[user talk:stickguy|talk]] || 18:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

5125 +++$+++  +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5125 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-24 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.295864400E09 +++$+++ Have you read the books? What do you think is the best hook for [[Everwild]]? --<font face=\"Kristen ITC\" color=\"Green\"> +++$+++ Have you read the books? What do you think is the best hook for [[Everwild]]? --<font face="Kristen ITC" color="Green">[[User:Tyw7|''Tyw7'']]</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;([[User_talk:Tyw7#skip_here|☎ Contact me!]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Tyw7|Contributions]]) &nbsp;&nbsp;''Changing the world one [[WP:edit|edit]] at a time!'' 02:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
5126 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5125 +++$+++ 5125 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.295864520E09 +++$+++ Not really, sorry. --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Not really, sorry. --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 02:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

267270 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.191887880E09 +++$+++ Sorry to see memory's of starwood are still bothering you. Best forgotton, indeed best not to mix this with the latest RFC. Which is unrelated. Not getting too emotionally involved in the latest seems like a good strategy as it looks like it will blow over quite soon (all the outside views are against further action). -- +++$+++ Sorry to see memory's of starwood are still bothering you. Best forgotton, indeed best not to mix this with the latest RFC. Which is unrelated. Not getting too emotionally involved in the latest seems like a good strategy as it looks like it will blow over quite soon (all the outside views are against further action). --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 16:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
267271 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267270 +++$+++ 267270 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.191888480E09 +++$+++ It would not have bothered me at all except that the newest RFC is based on [[User:Rdsmith4]]'s September 2, 2006 post to me. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&oldid=73361519#Sockpuppetry] which evokes an extremely painful period for me personally. It is clear that this incident in my personal life will forever be connected to my experience on Wikipedia. It is  a nightmare replay of [[:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ekajati |User:Ekajati]]. Now I am over the line and must fight off tremendous gloom.  -- +++$+++ :It would not have bothered me at all except that the newest RFC is based on [[User:Rdsmith4]]'s September 2, 2006 post to me. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&oldid=73361519#Sockpuppetry] which evokes an extremely painful period for me personally. It is clear that this incident in my personal life will forever be connected to my experience on Wikipedia. It is  a nightmare replay of [[:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ekajati |User:Ekajati]]. Now I am over the line and must fight off tremendous gloom.  --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 17:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

5127 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-25 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.296028200E09 +++$+++ Hi Obsidian Soul, I nominated ''[[Glischrochilus]]'' to be included in \"did you know?\" but then noticed that the sources about the attraction to beer aren't really [[WP:RS|reliable]], being a pest controllor's website and a blog. I tried to look for different sources but didn't have any luck. Can you find anything better or should I withdraw the nomination?  +++$+++ Hi Obsidian Soul, I nominated ''[[Glischrochilus]]'' to be included in "did you know?" but then noticed that the sources about the attraction to beer aren't really [[WP:RS|reliable]], being a pest controllor's website and a blog. I tried to look for different sources but didn't have any luck. Can you find anything better or should I withdraw the nomination? [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 23:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
5128 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5127 +++$+++ 5127 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.296037560E09 +++$+++ Hey, SmartSE. Some of the other more academic references in the article also mentions its common name as 'beer bugs' I think, but I didn't re-use them for those sentences. I'll go over them again and see if I can find one. I'll try searching online as well and in books we have here. If I still can't find any good sources for them, then feel free to withdraw the nomination, heh. Thanks for the heads up.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Hey, SmartSE. Some of the other more academic references in the article also mentions its common name as 'beer bugs' I think, but I didn't re-use them for those sentences. I'll go over them again and see if I can find one. I'll try searching online as well and in books we have here. If I still can't find any good sources for them, then feel free to withdraw the nomination, heh. Thanks for the heads up.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 02:26, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
5129 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5127 +++$+++ 5128 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.296101400E09 +++$+++ Cool, I couldn't check the journals unfortunately so was a bit stuck. I'll keep an eye on the article. Good luck with finding something, I really like the hook (hopefully, not blowing my own trumpet)!  +++$+++ ::Cool, I couldn't check the journals unfortunately so was a bit stuck. I'll keep an eye on the article. Good luck with finding something, I really like the hook (hopefully, not blowing my own trumpet)! [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 20:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

5130 +++$+++ WHZhang +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-31 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.296463020E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2009.jpg|The Bintang 2009] and its brethren ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2008.jpg 2008], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2007.jpg 2007], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2006.jpg 2006], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2005.jpg 2005], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2004.jpg 2004], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2003.jpg 2003], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2002.jpg 2002], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2001.jpg 2001], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2000.jpg 2000], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1999.jpg 1999], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1998.jpg 1998], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1997.jpg 1997], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1996.jpg 1996], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1995.jpg 1995], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1992.jpg 1992], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1991.jpg 1991], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1990.jpg 1990], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1989.jpg 1989]) seems to not have enough information for the Fair Use Rationale, and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:WHZhang my talk page] have been crammed again for that. I am hoping for some clarifications and pointers on how to have a concrete rationale. Thank you, from  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2009.jpg|The Bintang 2009] and its brethren ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2008.jpg 2008], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2007.jpg 2007], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2006.jpg 2006], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2005.jpg 2005], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2004.jpg 2004], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2003.jpg 2003], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2002.jpg 2002], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2001.jpg 2001], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_2000.jpg 2000], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1999.jpg 1999], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1998.jpg 1998], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1997.jpg 1997], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1996.jpg 1996], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1995.jpg 1995], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1992.jpg 1992], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1991.jpg 1991], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1990.jpg 1990], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WHZhang%27s_The_Bintang_1989.jpg 1989]) seems to not have enough information for the Fair Use Rationale, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:WHZhang my talk page] have been crammed again for that. I am hoping for some clarifications and pointers on how to have a concrete rationale. Thank you, from [[User:WHZhang|WHZhang]] ([[User talk:WHZhang|talk]]) 00:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
5131 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5130 +++$+++ 5130 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.296468840E09 +++$+++ As mentioned earlier, you really can't just use FUR on anything. The picture has to be important to the article and must increase the reader's understanding of the topic (e.g. if it illustrates something that could not be explained through text). I really recommend getting the pictures appropriately licensed instead by getting an OTRS ticket like I recommended earlier. FUR is usually only used for historically significant or non-replaceable pictures that illustrates the subject matter and adds educational value to the article on which it is used. Also, as the editor who placed the templates recommended, please try asking questions first in [[Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions]] --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :As mentioned earlier, you really can't just use FUR on anything. The picture has to be important to the article and must increase the reader's understanding of the topic (e.g. if it illustrates something that could not be explained through text). I really recommend getting the pictures appropriately licensed instead by getting an OTRS ticket like I recommended earlier. FUR is usually only used for historically significant or non-replaceable pictures that illustrates the subject matter and adds educational value to the article on which it is used. Also, as the editor who placed the templates recommended, please try asking questions first in [[Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions]] --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 02:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

5132 +++$+++ Pattieadams +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-31 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.296546180E09 +++$+++ I have provided a list of new reference links to articles published by media\/editors serving the waste management and recycling industries. All company press releases have been deleted from reference list. Also, other generic-type edits were made in text per your comments.  Please approve this new version of the GaiaRecycle information as this company is making a significant contribution to the waste management and ecological recycling industries. Thank you. Pattie Adams +++$+++ I have provided a list of new reference links to articles published by media/editors serving the waste management and recycling industries. All company press releases have been deleted from reference list. Also, other generic-type edits were made in text per your comments.  Please approve this new version of the GaiaRecycle information as this company is making a significant contribution to the waste management and ecological recycling industries. Thank you. Pattie Adams[[User:Pattieadams|Pattieadams]] ([[User talk:Pattieadams|talk]]) 23:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
5133 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5132 +++$+++ 5132 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.296563880E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but you should contact the reviewer in question. In this case, it's [[User_talk:CharlieEchoTango]]. I am not a reviewer and only helped submit the article per irc convo. Please also listen to what reviewers tell you. It will help you write an article that abides by major policies and help it getting accepted. No single editor controls wikipedia, thus you must try to follow the policies as best as you can or your article will be declined\/deleted again and again (even if you convince one editor to approve it). Thank you.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Sorry, but you should contact the reviewer in question. In this case, it's [[User_talk:CharlieEchoTango]]. I am not a reviewer and only helped submit the article per irc convo. Please also listen to what reviewers tell you. It will help you write an article that abides by major policies and help it getting accepted. No single editor controls wikipedia, thus you must try to follow the policies as best as you can or your article will be declined/deleted again and again (even if you convince one editor to approve it). Thank you.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 04:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

529421 +++$+++ Art LaPella +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-28 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.209376980E09 +++$+++ If the hooks attributed to BInguyen, Piotrus and Cirt appeared today, I would remove the space after each ellipsis, end each hook with a question mark, and correct <nowiki>[[rowing|single sculls]]<\/nowiki>, which links to a disambiguation page. Since they didn't appear today, perhaps you printed them that way in the interest of an exact quote. But I have given almost every hook in the last 20 months or so a spaceless ellipsis and a question mark.  +++$+++ If the hooks attributed to BInguyen, Piotrus and Cirt appeared today, I would remove the space after each ellipsis, end each hook with a question mark, and correct <nowiki>[[rowing|single sculls]]</nowiki>, which links to a disambiguation page. Since they didn't appear today, perhaps you printed them that way in the interest of an exact quote. But I have given almost every hook in the last 20 months or so a spaceless ellipsis and a question mark. [[User:Art LaPella|Art LaPella]] ([[User talk:Art LaPella|talk]]) 03:03, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
529422 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529421 +++$+++ 529421 +++$+++ 2008-04-28 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.209377520E09 +++$+++ {{tick|18}} '''Done''' Those are all good points. Those quotes were all added by my co-author. Thanks for the review! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :{{tick|18}} '''Done''' Those are all good points. Those quotes were all added by my co-author. Thanks for the review! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:12, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

5134 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-02 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.296655320E09 +++$+++ }}  \u2014 +++$+++ }}  —[[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  06:02, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
5135 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5134 +++$+++ 5134 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 10:28:00 +++$+++ 1.296671280E09 +++$+++ Congrats. I hope it is the first of many.  +++$+++ :Congrats. I hope it is the first of many. [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 10:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

5136 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-06 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.297053300E09 +++$+++ Nice work with the article. I'll fire off an email to Dr. Wilby at the British Geological Survey to see if he might release the picture he drew with the ink under a creative commons licence.  +++$+++ Nice work with the article. I'll fire off an email to Dr. Wilby at the British Geological Survey to see if he might release the picture he drew with the ink under a creative commons licence. [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 20:35, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
5137 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 2011-02-06 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.297053480E09 +++$+++ That would be awesome! :D Thanks. At the moment I'm reduced to scavenging 19th century illustrations LOL. The article is still not finished though, still have to add stuff on its history between Mantell, Pearce, and Owen. Need to research some more stuff too, some info are a bit contradictory.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :That would be awesome! :D Thanks. At the moment I'm reduced to scavenging 19th century illustrations LOL. The article is still not finished though, still have to add stuff on its history between Mantell, Pearce, and Owen. Need to research some more stuff too, some info are a bit contradictory.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 20:38, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
5138 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 5137 +++$+++ 2011-02-06 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.297054380E09 +++$+++ No probs, keep your fingers crossed. The article is certainly good enough for DYK - don't forget to nominate it within 5 days of starting to expand it, even if there are a few things you need to tweak still.  +++$+++ ::No probs, keep your fingers crossed. The article is certainly good enough for DYK - don't forget to nominate it within 5 days of starting to expand it, even if there are a few things you need to tweak still. [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 20:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
5139 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 5138 +++$+++ 2011-02-06 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.297054800E09 +++$+++ Speaking of which, you might be interested in the last article I expanded\/created, cleaned up by [[User talk:Mgiganteus1|Mgiganteus1]]: [[Neon flying squid]]--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::Speaking of which, you might be interested in the last article I expanded/created, cleaned up by [[User talk:Mgiganteus1|Mgiganteus1]]: [[Neon flying squid]]--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 21:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
5140 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 5139 +++$+++ 2011-02-06 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.297057740E09 +++$+++ It's too late for that unfortunately - I should have stalked you more closely! One thing though - have you sent an email to ask whether we can use [[:File:Ommastrephes_bartramii_(Neon_flying_squid),_Northern_Hawaiian_waters.jpg|this file]]? I noticed it is licenced under a non-commercial licence on tolweb which annoyinglu would mean that we can't use it :(  +++$+++ ::::It's too late for that unfortunately - I should have stalked you more closely! One thing though - have you sent an email to ask whether we can use [[:File:Ommastrephes_bartramii_(Neon_flying_squid),_Northern_Hawaiian_waters.jpg|this file]]? I noticed it is licenced under a non-commercial licence on tolweb which annoyinglu would mean that we can't use it :( [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 21:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
5141 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 5137 +++$+++ 2011-02-06 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.297058100E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately still don't know the mechanics of DYK heh. No worries though. And yes on that picture, I got permission from the author and sent an OTRS along with his email of permission. OTRS haven't replied yet, so I don't know if there's any problem on their end. --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::Unfortunately still don't know the mechanics of DYK heh. No worries though. And yes on that picture, I got permission from the author and sent an OTRS along with his email of permission. OTRS haven't replied yet, so I don't know if there's any problem on their end. --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 21:55, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
5142 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 5141 +++$+++ 2011-02-06 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.297058280E09 +++$+++ It's pretty simple, new or 5x expanded can be nominated within 5 days of the expansion\/creation date. Cool - just wanted to check, seem to recall getting caught out by non-commercial licences before, that's all. OTRS should deal with it soon.  +++$+++ :::It's pretty simple, new or 5x expanded can be nominated within 5 days of the expansion/creation date. Cool - just wanted to check, seem to recall getting caught out by non-commercial licences before, that's all. OTRS should deal with it soon. [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 21:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
5143 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 5137 +++$+++ 2011-02-06 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.297058820E09 +++$+++ Gotcha, thanks. :) DYK is really just a bonus though, heh. It's enough that the article has been expanded. I'll try to nominate ''[[Belemnotheutis]]'' later today after I finish the last section and start cleaning up.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::Gotcha, thanks. :) DYK is really just a bonus though, heh. It's enough that the article has been expanded. I'll try to nominate ''[[Belemnotheutis]]'' later today after I finish the last section and start cleaning up.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 22:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
5144 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 5143 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.297146180E09 +++$+++ If you can't get copies, I'm sure someone here can, or Dr. Wilby might if I ask.  +++$+++ :::If you can't get copies, I'm sure someone here can, or Dr. Wilby might if I ask. [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 22:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
5145 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 5137 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.297182480E09 +++$+++ Can't find anything available freely. Do you know any wikipedian editor with society access to the Wiley Online Library?--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::Can't find anything available freely. Do you know any wikipedian editor with society access to the Wiley Online Library?--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 08:28, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
5146 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 5145 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.297192800E09 +++$+++ I'll see what I can do. I'll send you an email, can reply so I can forward them to you if someone has access? I'm making you sound like a naughty child... but you haven't nominated it for DYK yet. Do you need a hand with the template?  +++$+++ :::I'll see what I can do. I'll send you an email, can reply so I can forward them to you if someone has access? I'm making you sound like a naughty child... but you haven't nominated it for DYK yet. Do you need a hand with the template? [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 11:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
5147 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 5137 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.297193100E09 +++$+++ Heh, cool thanks. :) As for the nomination. I should probably do that now. Was putting it off until I can write the History subsection but I guess I can do that while it's being considered.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::Heh, cool thanks. :) As for the nomination. I should probably do that now. Was putting it off until I can write the History subsection but I guess I can do that while it's being considered.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 11:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
5148 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5136 +++$+++ 5147 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.297197420E09 +++$+++ I've got 'em so reply to my email and I'll forward them your way.  +++$+++ :::I've got 'em so reply to my email and I'll forward them your way. [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 12:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

267281 +++$+++ Lquilter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267281 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-09 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.191928620E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse -- you know there is already a [[:Category:Science and engineering awards]]?  I'm going to do a CFD; the [[:Category:Science awards]] and [[:Category:Science and engineering awards]] should be combined. -- +++$+++ Hi Mattisse -- you know there is already a [[:Category:Science and engineering awards]]?  I'm going to do a CFD; the [[:Category:Science awards]] and [[:Category:Science and engineering awards]] should be combined. --[[User:Lquilter|lquilter]] 04:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
267282 +++$+++ Lquilter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267281 +++$+++ 267281 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.191962580E09 +++$+++ Mattisee - I responded briefly on my talk page, but I think it would be even better to have discussions at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2007_October_9#Category:Science_awards CFD], where other people can follow the conversation and chime in. -- +++$+++ : Mattisee - I responded briefly on my talk page, but I think it would be even better to have discussions at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_October_9#Category:Science_awards CFD], where other people can follow the conversation and chime in. --[[User:Lquilter|lquilter]] 13:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

267283 +++$+++ jennylen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-09 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.191952620E09 +++$+++ Your legal use definition is the best I have seen so far in that article, would you care to source it before someone deletes it as unsourced or so? <font color=\"00A813\"> +++$+++ Your legal use definition is the best I have seen so far in that article, would you care to source it before someone deletes it as unsourced or so? <font color="00A813">[[User:jennylen|Jenny]]</font><sup><font color="00551BB3">[[User_talk:Jennylen|Len]]</font></sup>☤ 10:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
267284 +++$+++ jennylen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267283 +++$+++ 267283 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.192035420E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your response and your kind explanation. I think you are doing a nice work on that <font color=\"00A813\"> +++$+++ :Thank you for your response and your kind explanation. I think you are doing a nice work on that <font color="00A813">[[User:jennylen|Jenny]]</font><sup><font color="00551BB3">[[User_talk:Jennylen|Len]]</font></sup>☤ 09:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

267286 +++$+++ PalaceGuard008 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267286 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-10 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.192007280E09 +++$+++ As to Dougong, I reiterate that the bits in Caisson (Asian architecture) on Dougongs were added some time before you created the [[Dougong]] article. You are not the only person who has an interest in Chinese architecture. -- +++$+++ As to Dougong, I reiterate that the bits in Caisson (Asian architecture) on Dougongs were added some time before you created the [[Dougong]] article. You are not the only person who has an interest in Chinese architecture. --[[User:PalaceGuard008|PalaceGuard008]] ([[User_Talk:PalaceGuard008|Talk]]) 02:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
267287 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267286 +++$+++ 267286 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.192008420E09 +++$+++ I am not saying I am the only one. But you are not the only one either, and your approach is not the only one. I object to being shoehorned into your mentality.  I do not like articles that combine everything into one article that I am unwilling to read to find out about the one word I want to know about. I am interested in Chinese architecture centuries older than you are. I know that when I click a link in an article and get a large article containing a bunch of combined  information I don't want, I am annoyed and generally don't read the article. In the India architecture series we had great success with short, succinct articles explaining Indian words used in the Feature Articles we were working on. I am totally uninterested in the Forbidden  City.  I saw your Caisson article and did not like it for my purposes. I do not want to use Western terms for Chinese building that have Chinese terms. -- +++$+++ :I am not saying I am the only one. But you are not the only one either, and your approach is not the only one. I object to being shoehorned into your mentality.  I do not like articles that combine everything into one article that I am unwilling to read to find out about the one word I want to know about. I am interested in Chinese architecture centuries older than you are. I know that when I click a link in an article and get a large article containing a bunch of combined  information I don't want, I am annoyed and generally don't read the article. In the India architecture series we had great success with short, succinct articles explaining Indian words used in the Feature Articles we were working on. I am totally uninterested in the Forbidden  City.  I saw your Caisson article and did not like it for my purposes. I do not want to use Western terms for Chinese building that have Chinese terms. --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 02:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
267288 +++$+++ PalaceGuard008 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267286 +++$+++ 267287 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.192087260E09 +++$+++ If you don't like an article \"for your own purposes\", you can't just go and start up a new article on the same subject under a different name. It would be like if I said \"I don't like the structure of [[Buckingham Palace]] for my own purposes, so I'll go start a new article called [[The Building Formerly Known as Buckingham House]].\" -- +++$+++ :: If you don't like an article "for your own purposes", you can't just go and start up a new article on the same subject under a different name. It would be like if I said "I don't like the structure of [[Buckingham Palace]] for my own purposes, so I'll go start a new article called [[The Building Formerly Known as Buckingham House]]." --[[User:PalaceGuard008|PalaceGuard008]] ([[User_Talk:PalaceGuard008|Talk]]) 00:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

529431 +++$+++ GaryColemanFan +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-29 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.209469380E09 +++$+++ Hi, you reviewed the article on [[Jos LeDuc]] a while back. I found the review very helpful, and your feedback is greatly appreciated. If you have time, I was wondering if you would be able to review the article on [[Money Inc.]] It was nominated for GA one month ago and is still awaiting a reviewer. If you're really busy, though, please don't feel obligated. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi, you reviewed the article on [[Jos LeDuc]] a while back. I found the review very helpful, and your feedback is greatly appreciated. If you have time, I was wondering if you would be able to review the article on [[Money Inc.]] It was nominated for GA one month ago and is still awaiting a reviewer. If you're really busy, though, please don't feel obligated. Thanks, [[User:GaryColemanFan|GaryColemanFan]] ([[User talk:GaryColemanFan|talk]]) 04:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
529432 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529431 +++$+++ 529431 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.209471180E09 +++$+++ Sure, I can do the GA review. I actually remember them. I was mildly interested in wrestling for a short while, right when they were a team. I have just the right amount of familiarity with them - detached familiarity but not a fan. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Sure, I can do the GA review. I actually remember them. I was mildly interested in wrestling for a short while, right when they were a team. I have just the right amount of familiarity with them - detached familiarity but not a fan. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

267290 +++$+++ Freechild  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267290 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-10 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.192080060E09 +++$+++ Hope you've been watching the [[Clarence W. Wigington]] article, because I've added a lot more info relevant to the man's accomplishments in SP. Also, I proposed a sort of compromise to your rewording of the DYK on that talk page. \u2022 <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"><font color=\"#C00000\">[[User :Freechild|Freechild]]''<small> +++$+++ Hope you've been watching the [[Clarence W. Wigington]] article, because I've added a lot more info relevant to the man's accomplishments in SP. Also, I proposed a sort of compromise to your rewording of the DYK on that talk page. • <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#C00000">[[User :Freechild|Freechild]]''<small>[[User talk:Freechild |'sup?]]''</small></font></span> 22:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
267291 +++$+++ Freechild  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267290 +++$+++ 267290 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.192086780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for calling my attention to that discrepancy. Its fixed. I'm glad we both appreciate Wigington's work. \u2022 <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"><font color=\"#C00000\">[[User :Freechild|Freechild]]''<small> +++$+++ :Thanks for calling my attention to that discrepancy. Its fixed. I'm glad we both appreciate Wigington's work. • <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#C00000">[[User :Freechild|Freechild]]''<small>[[User talk:Freechild |'sup?]]''</small></font></span> 00:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
267292 +++$+++ Freechild  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267290 +++$+++ 267291 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.192089420E09 +++$+++ The closest I can find by way of a definition is a [http:\/\/query.nytimes.com\/gst\/abstract.html?res=9403EEDF1E3EE233A25751C0A9639C946096D6CF 1911 NYTimes article] that sounds almost flippant about the job. Wigington was a municipal architect because he worked for a [[municipality]]. His early work in Omaha included a few houses, but it seems that his later design - which he is highly regarded for - was solely focused on [[public works]]. \u2022 <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"><font color=\"#C00000\">[[User :Freechild|Freechild]]''<small> +++$+++ ::The closest I can find by way of a definition is a [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9403EEDF1E3EE233A25751C0A9639C946096D6CF 1911 NYTimes article] that sounds almost flippant about the job. Wigington was a municipal architect because he worked for a [[municipality]]. His early work in Omaha included a few houses, but it seems that his later design - which he is highly regarded for - was solely focused on [[public works]]. • <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#C00000">[[User :Freechild|Freechild]]''<small>[[User talk:Freechild |'sup?]]''</small></font></span> 00:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
267293 +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267290 +++$+++ 267291 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.192091400E09 +++$+++ I saw your message on Freechild's talk page.  The reference I have, ''AIA Guide to the Twin Cities'' by [[Larry Millett]], says: \"Its designer and namesake ([of the Clarence W. Wigington Pavilion on Harriet Island]), Clarence Wigington, was the nation's first black municipal architect; he worked as a draftsman and later as chief designer for the St. Paul City Architect's office from 1915 until 1949.\"  I guess that's the best definition of \"municipal architect\" that we can provide.  -- +++$+++ ::I saw your message on Freechild's talk page.  The reference I have, ''AIA Guide to the Twin Cities'' by [[Larry Millett]], says: "Its designer and namesake ([of the Clarence W. Wigington Pavilion on Harriet Island]), Clarence Wigington, was the nation's first black municipal architect; he worked as a draftsman and later as chief designer for the St. Paul City Architect's office from 1915 until 1949."  I guess that's the best definition of "municipal architect" that we can provide.  --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 01:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

525146 +++$+++ Robotsintrouble +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-06 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.162809480E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ Thanks! [[User:Robotsintrouble|Robotsintrouble]] 02:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
525147 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525146 +++$+++ 525146 +++$+++ 2006-11-06 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.162823400E09 +++$+++ 3. Unfortunately, we have a real shortage of anatomical diagrams available to us at the moment, so I'd recommend against deleting the images. Instead, I'd recommend that you add a description to the captions indicating inaccuracies in the diagrams. (If you're not sure how to do this, let me know and I'll be happy to assist.) I've added some additional links and images (including your suggestion) to [[Brachioradialis]], which may be of some assistance for your exam on Friday. Good luck. -- +++$+++ :3. Unfortunately, we have a real shortage of anatomical diagrams available to us at the moment, so I'd recommend against deleting the images. Instead, I'd recommend that you add a description to the captions indicating inaccuracies in the diagrams. (If you're not sure how to do this, let me know and I'll be happy to assist.) I've added some additional links and images (including your suggestion) to [[Brachioradialis]], which may be of some assistance for your exam on Friday. Good luck. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 06:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
525148 +++$+++ Robotsintrouble +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525146 +++$+++ 525147 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.162892760E09 +++$+++ Check the image on [[omohyoid]] again. The muscle is labeled on both sides, although on the anatomical right it's omo -  -  hyoidus. I don't want to revert your edits since you did other things.  +++$+++ ::Check the image on [[omohyoid]] again. The muscle is labeled on both sides, although on the anatomical right it's omo -  -  hyoidus. I don't want to revert your edits since you did other things. [[User:Robotsintrouble|Robotsintrouble]] 01:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
525149 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525146 +++$+++ 525148 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.162893300E09 +++$+++ You are correct. I have fixed the caption. -- +++$+++ :::You are correct. I have fixed the caption. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
525150 +++$+++ Robotsintrouble +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525146 +++$+++ 525147 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.162903680E09 +++$+++ I really like the image gallery you put into [[brachioradialis]]. Is there any way to write a wikitool that lists anatomy stubs lacking images? I've been trying to figure out ways to integrate more of the grey's plates into articles. Maybe a list of all the labels in each image would help? If I were to start typing those out, where should they go? The wikicommons page of each image perhaps?  +++$+++ ::I really like the image gallery you put into [[brachioradialis]]. Is there any way to write a wikitool that lists anatomy stubs lacking images? I've been trying to figure out ways to integrate more of the grey's plates into articles. Maybe a list of all the labels in each image would help? If I were to start typing those out, where should they go? The wikicommons page of each image perhaps? [[User:Robotsintrouble|Robotsintrouble]] 04:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
525151 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525146 +++$+++ 525150 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.162906680E09 +++$+++ I don't know of any totally automated tool that would do what you want, but if you're handy with [[regular expressions]], you might want to take a look at [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser]]. By the way, have you seen [[List of images and subjects in Gray's Anatomy]]? It could be useful if you're trying to put that list together. -- +++$+++ :::I don't know of any totally automated tool that would do what you want, but if you're handy with [[regular expressions]], you might want to take a look at [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser]]. By the way, have you seen [[List of images and subjects in Gray's Anatomy]]? It could be useful if you're trying to put that list together. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 05:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
525152 +++$+++ Robotsintrouble +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525146 +++$+++ 525151 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.162907100E09 +++$+++ In other news (is this annoying yet?) I found another seer image that's wrong, this time at [[Pharynx]]. From the article text: ''Oropharynx, which lies behind the oral cavity. The anterior wall consists of the base of the tongue and the vallecula;''  ...does that arrow look like it's behind the base of the tongue to you?  +++$+++ ::::In other news (is this annoying yet?) I found another seer image that's wrong, this time at [[Pharynx]]. From the article text: ''Oropharynx, which lies behind the oral cavity. The anterior wall consists of the base of the tongue and the vallecula;''  ...does that arrow look like it's behind the base of the tongue to you? [[User:Robotsintrouble|Robotsintrouble]] 05:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
525153 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525146 +++$+++ 525152 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.163074620E09 +++$+++ As with the Brachioradialis image, I'd recommend not deleting the image, but adding a caption annotation addressing inaccuracies in the image. Or, if you're feeling ambitious, you might be able to fix the picture. Since it sounds like your main objection is the position of the arrow, you could just adjust a few dots on the picture (even [[Microsoft Paint]] should be sufficent) and adjust it to address your concerns. -- +++$+++ :::::As with the Brachioradialis image, I'd recommend not deleting the image, but adding a caption annotation addressing inaccuracies in the image. Or, if you're feeling ambitious, you might be able to fix the picture. Since it sounds like your main objection is the position of the arrow, you could just adjust a few dots on the picture (even [[Microsoft Paint]] should be sufficent) and adjust it to address your concerns. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 04:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
525154 +++$+++ Diberri +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525146 +++$+++ 525153 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.163078640E09 +++$+++ (Hope you don't mind me joining the conversation.) Do you mean \"delete\" as in deleting the image from WP entirely, or as in simply removing it from the article? I agree these images shouldn't be outright deleted, but I think removing them from the article is a step in the right direction. IMO it's better than annotating the error. I tend to agree with [[Frank Netter|Netter]] that if the image isn't conveying a useful idea (and an erroneous image most certainly isn't), then it's not worth sharing. -- +++$+++ ::::::(Hope you don't mind me joining the conversation.) Do you mean "delete" as in deleting the image from WP entirely, or as in simply removing it from the article? I agree these images shouldn't be outright deleted, but I think removing them from the article is a step in the right direction. IMO it's better than annotating the error. I tend to agree with [[Frank Netter|Netter]] that if the image isn't conveying a useful idea (and an erroneous image most certainly isn't), then it's not worth sharing. --[[User:Diberri|David Iberri]] ([[User talk:Diberri|talk]]) 05:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
525155 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525146 +++$+++ 525154 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.163082240E09 +++$+++ Response at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anatomy#Images]]. -- +++$+++ :::::::Response at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anatomy#Images]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 06:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

529439 +++$+++ Deelzbub +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-02 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.209714240E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I was so impressed with the track details you added.  I will be following up with the citations!  +++$+++ Thank you! I was so impressed with the track details you added.  I will be following up with the citations! [[User:Deelzbub|Deelzbub]] ([[User talk:Deelzbub|talk]]) 00:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
529440 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529439 +++$+++ 529439 +++$+++ 2008-05-03 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.209852120E09 +++$+++ Speaking of which, did you really mean to refer to \"score cars\" in that article, or did you mean \"score cards\"? I've never heard of \"score cars\" but then I don't know much about car racing :)  +++$+++ :Speaking of which, did you really mean to refer to "score cars" in that article, or did you mean "score cards"? I've never heard of "score cars" but then I don't know much about car racing :) [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 15:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
529441 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529439 +++$+++ 529440 +++$+++ 2008-05-03 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.209854400E09 +++$+++ Yes, I know what a score ''card'' is, but you wrote \"score '''car'''\" in the article. Was that a typo, or is there really such a thing as a score \"car\"?  +++$+++ ::Yes, I know what a score ''card'' is, but you wrote "score '''car'''" in the article. Was that a typo, or is there really such a thing as a score "car"? [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 15:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
529442 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529439 +++$+++ 529441 +++$+++ 2008-05-03 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.209854820E09 +++$+++ No problemo. I know how easy it is to make these little typos, I've done it a few times myself. It always seems to be easier to see the other guy's typo somehow :)  +++$+++ :::No problemo. I know how easy it is to make these little typos, I've done it a few times myself. It always seems to be easier to see the other guy's typo somehow :) [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 15:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

5154 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-17 09:17:00 +++$+++ 1.297963020E09 +++$+++ Though I appreciate your intent in good faith, I am at a complete loss to understand your input. Sincerely,  +++$+++ Though I appreciate your intent in good faith, I am at a complete loss to understand your input. Sincerely, [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 09:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
5155 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5154 +++$+++ 5154 +++$+++ 2011-02-17 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.297964580E09 +++$+++ Again let me emphasize that helpers from IRC can not help with content disputes (we have no more authority to do so than everyone else). We can only help with editing problems. Your use of the template was inappropriate in the given context so I removed it, though I did try to give you the relevant policies involved in such disputes to help settle it. Again please try seeking comments from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Saints]] instead or do a simple [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]].--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ *Again let me emphasize that helpers from IRC can not help with content disputes (we have no more authority to do so than everyone else). We can only help with editing problems. Your use of the template was inappropriate in the given context so I removed it, though I did try to give you the relevant policies involved in such disputes to help settle it. Again please try seeking comments from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Saints]] instead or do a simple [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]].--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 09:43, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

5156 +++$+++ NearTheZoo +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5156 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-19 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.298170140E09 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul:  *Thanks!!!* for fixing the problem with the double-column listing of the cast members for the film. I couldn't figure it out, but now I've learned from your fix. Many thanks!  +++$+++ Obsidian Soul:  *Thanks!!!* for fixing the problem with the double-column listing of the cast members for the film. I couldn't figure it out, but now I've learned from your fix. Many thanks! [[User:NearTheZoo|NearTheZoo]] ([[User talk:NearTheZoo|talk]]) 18:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
5157 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5156 +++$+++ 5156 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.298170320E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. :) --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 18:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

532643 +++$+++ HighInBC +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-28 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.164781080E09 +++$+++ It seems to have turned out well, thanks alot for the nomination. I expected alot more opposition, not sure why.  +++$+++ It seems to have turned out well, thanks alot for the nomination. I expected alot more opposition, not sure why. [[User:HighInBC|HighInBC]]<small> <sup>(Need help? [[User_talk:HighInBC|Ask me]])</sup></small> 22:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
532644 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532643 +++$+++ 532643 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.164932760E09 +++$+++ The best suggestion would be to have a look at some other articles about FC and try to make it in the same way. --''' +++$+++ : The best suggestion would be to have a look at some other articles about FC and try to make it in the same way. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 16:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

5158 +++$+++ KFP +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5158 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-22 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.298424660E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For helping out newbies in the Wikipedia IRC help channel!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For helping out newbies in the Wikipedia IRC help channel! [[User:KFP|KFP]] <small>([[User talk:KFP|contact]] | [[Special:Contributions/KFP|edits]])</small> 17:31, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
5159 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5158 +++$+++ 5158 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.298424900E09 +++$+++ <3 *eats it*--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :<3 *eats it*--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 17:35, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

5160 +++$+++ Comedybiographer +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5160 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-25 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.298647500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Comedybiographer|Comedybiographer]] ([[User talk:Comedybiographer|talk]]) 07:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
5161 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5160 +++$+++ 5160 +++$+++ 2011-02-25 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.298657640E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) Feel free to ask if you need help with editing again. Hope that experience hasn't soured you from Wikipedia, heh. They're quite common mistakes for newbies to make and our handling of them can be somewhat harsher than necessary.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. :) Feel free to ask if you need help with editing again. Hope that experience hasn't soured you from Wikipedia, heh. They're quite common mistakes for newbies to make and our handling of them can be somewhat harsher than necessary.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 10:14, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

267305 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-12 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.192241280E09 +++$+++ Just caught your updates. You have been working hard! Just that I thought it was only considered necessary to Wikilink the first occurrence of a phrase in an article? Cheers. --''' +++$+++ Just caught your updates. You have been working hard! Just that I thought it was only considered necessary to Wikilink the first occurrence of a phrase in an article? Cheers. --'''[[User:Rodhullandemu|Rodhullandemu]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rodhullandemu|contribs]]) 19:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
267306 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267305 +++$+++ 267305 +++$+++ 2007-10-12 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.192241520E09 +++$+++ That is generally the case, or the next occurrence in a new section, or after a chunk of text has gone by etc. I know in Feature Articles, more than on link is allowed under the above circumstances, especially if it is an unfamiliar word or term. But feel free to remove any you deem excessive. I am not doing an extensive evaluation of where they should go, I admit.  -- +++$+++ :That is generally the case, or the next occurrence in a new section, or after a chunk of text has gone by etc. I know in Feature Articles, more than on link is allowed under the above circumstances, especially if it is an unfamiliar word or term. But feel free to remove any you deem excessive. I am not doing an extensive evaluation of where they should go, I admit.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:12, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
267307 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267305 +++$+++ 267306 +++$+++ 2007-10-12 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.192241820E09 +++$+++ That's OK, I can't get too bothered about it. Keep on keeping on. --''' +++$+++ ::That's OK, I can't get too bothered about it. Keep on keeping on. --'''[[User:Rodhullandemu|Rodhullandemu]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rodhullandemu|contribs]]) 19:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

534248 +++$+++ AntiVandalBot +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-07 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.157692380E09 +++$+++ Your recent edit to [[:Calnar]] ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Calnar&diff=74413307&oldid=73824565 diff]) was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair [[Wikipedia:vandalism|vandalism]] to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies \u2013 if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. '''[[User:AntiVandalBot\/FAQ|Click here]]''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. \/\/  +++$+++ Your recent edit to [[:Calnar]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calnar&diff=74413307&oldid=73824565 diff]) was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair [[Wikipedia:vandalism|vandalism]] to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. '''[[User:AntiVandalBot/FAQ|Click here]]''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. // [[User:AntiVandalBot|AntiVandalBot]] 22:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
534249 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534248 +++$+++ 534248 +++$+++ 2006-09-30 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.159621380E09 +++$+++ Just putting this down for the record, the edit to Calnar was '''not''' vandalism, it was an honest mistake.  I meant to put a redirect there, but accidently just blanked the page.  <font color=\"orange\">[[User:DoomsDay349|Dooms]]<\/font><font color=\"purple\">[[User talk:DoomsDay349|Day34]]<\/font><font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :Just putting this down for the record, the edit to Calnar was '''not''' vandalism, it was an honest mistake.  I meant to put a redirect there, but accidently just blanked the page.  <font color="orange">[[User:DoomsDay349|Dooms]]</font><font color="purple">[[User talk:DoomsDay349|Day34]]</font><font color="green">[[User:DoomsDay349/Esperanza|9]]</font> 06:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

5164 +++$+++ Deflective +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-22 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.300848540E09 +++$+++ Also, if we completely remove the old IPA templates we can start standardizing the template people use. -- +++$+++ Also, if we completely remove the old IPA templates we can start standardizing the template people use. --[[User:Deflective|deflective]] ([[User talk:Deflective|talk]]) 19:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
5165 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5164 +++$+++ 5164 +++$+++ 2011-03-22 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.300848840E09 +++$+++ Sorry, you should put that in your edit summary to make it clearer. It was already reverted before and I couldn't quite understand why you were changing a comment on the talk page of all places. I think we both assumed you were refactoring the comments of another user. Anyway, my apologies. I won't revert it again. --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Sorry, you should put that in your edit summary to make it clearer. It was already reverted before and I couldn't quite understand why you were changing a comment on the talk page of all places. I think we both assumed you were refactoring the comments of another user. Anyway, my apologies. I won't revert it again. --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 19:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
5166 +++$+++ Deflective +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5164 +++$+++ 5165 +++$+++ 2011-03-22 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.300849620E09 +++$+++ No worries, it's been pointed out to me that I should have explanation of the bot on my user page to help clarify things.  I gotta get around to that.  +++$+++ ::No worries, it's been pointed out to me that I should have explanation of the bot on my user page to help clarify things.  I gotta get around to that. [[User:Deflective|— deflective]] ([[User talk:Deflective|talk]]) 20:07, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

5167 +++$+++ 173.246.35.178 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-25 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.301060100E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/173.246.35.178|173.246.35.178]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/173.246.35.178|173.246.35.178]] ([[User talk:173.246.35.178|talk]]) 06:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
5168 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5167 +++$+++ 5167 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.301060640E09 +++$+++ If nothing else, you can try emailing the copyright holders of the photos and ask them to release an image for free (usually under the [[CC-BY-SA]] license). The process of doing that is outlined here: [[Commons:OTRS]]. I suggest you create a user account in Wikipedia and Commons as you can't upload any free images you find yourself unless you are registered.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :If nothing else, you can try emailing the copyright holders of the photos and ask them to release an image for free (usually under the [[CC-BY-SA]] license). The process of doing that is outlined here: [[Commons:OTRS]]. I suggest you create a user account in Wikipedia and Commons as you can't upload any free images you find yourself unless you are registered.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 06:44, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

267312 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267312 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-14 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.192353420E09 +++$+++ Hi,<br>Following a taxing rewrite of [[trade routes]] I have been busy writing relaxing articles under [[Wikipedia: WikiProject Protected Areas|WikiProject Protected Areas]]. I have rewritten the [[Jim Corbett National Park]] article and am planning to nominate it for GA after some checking and re-checking (for which I'm currently too tired\/blind). It would be of help to me if you could read the article and tell me what more needs to be done to push it to to GA. Personally, I think this fascinating article has solid FA potential.<br>With Regards,<br> +++$+++ Hi,<br>Following a taxing rewrite of [[trade routes]] I have been busy writing relaxing articles under [[Wikipedia: WikiProject Protected Areas|WikiProject Protected Areas]]. I have rewritten the [[Jim Corbett National Park]] article and am planning to nominate it for GA after some checking and re-checking (for which I'm currently too tired/blind). It would be of help to me if you could read the article and tell me what more needs to be done to push it to to GA. Personally, I think this fascinating article has solid FA potential.<br>With Regards,<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelok</font>]] 02:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
267313 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267312 +++$+++ 267312 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.192506900E09 +++$+++ No problem, I figured that you were busy and would reply when you had time. Since the GA review for [[Trade Routes]] is still pending and I may have to wait before [[Jim Corbett National Park]] gets reviewed I'll just bring [[Spice trade]] up to par in the meantime. That way I can get some work done and hopefully promote Spice trade to GA as well.<br>I'll keep you posted and will keep seeking suggestions from you,<br>With Regards,<br> +++$+++ :No problem, I figured that you were busy and would reply when you had time. Since the GA review for [[Trade Routes]] is still pending and I may have to wait before [[Jim Corbett National Park]] gets reviewed I'll just bring [[Spice trade]] up to par in the meantime. That way I can get some work done and hopefully promote Spice trade to GA as well.<br>I'll keep you posted and will keep seeking suggestions from you,<br>With Regards,<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelok</font>]] 20:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
267314 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267312 +++$+++ 267313 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.192507200E09 +++$+++ Yes, one Major Ramsay actually. He was the one who evicted the tribals.  +++$+++ ::Yes, one Major Ramsay actually. He was the one who evicted the tribals. [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelok</font>]] 21:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
267315 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267312 +++$+++ 267312 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.192511220E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the copyedit; In its new avatar the article will certainly do a better job in engaging a reader. +++$+++ :Thank you for the copyedit; In its new avatar the article will certainly do a better job in engaging a reader.[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelok</font>]] 22:07, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
267316 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267312 +++$+++ 267315 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.192513380E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Jim_Corbett_National_Park&diff=164826025&oldid=164824659 Yes sir]. My fault sir,  :-)  +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jim_Corbett_National_Park&diff=164826025&oldid=164824659 Yes sir]. My fault sir,  :-) [[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="#708090">Havelok</font>]] 22:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

5169 +++$+++ 173.246.35.179 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-25 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.301101860E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/173.246.35.179|173.246.35.179]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/173.246.35.179|173.246.35.179]] ([[User talk:173.246.35.179|talk]]) 18:11, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
5170 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5169 +++$+++ 5169 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.301103660E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) Feel free to drop by our [irc:\/\/irc.freenode.net\/wikipedia-en-help live help chat] if you have more questions. And yep, [[Wikipedia:Tutorial\/Registration|getting an account]] makes it easier to keep track of your activities among other benefits. --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. :) Feel free to drop by our [irc://irc.freenode.net/wikipedia-en-help live help chat] if you have more questions. And yep, [[Wikipedia:Tutorial/Registration|getting an account]] makes it easier to keep track of your activities among other benefits. --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#f50">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#f50">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 18:41, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

88243 +++$+++ G-Man +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88243 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2003-10-19 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.066590480E09 +++$+++ And that's only some of them.  +++$+++ And that's only some of them. [[User:G-Man|G-Man]] 12:08, 19 Oct 2003 (UTC)
88244 +++$+++ Shallot +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88243 +++$+++ 88243 +++$+++ 2003-10-19 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.066611600E09 +++$+++ There's plenty of other examples; sadly, the better part of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=Shallot my contributions] is about this! :( -- +++$+++ : There's plenty of other examples; sadly, the better part of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=Shallot my contributions] is about this! :( --[[User:Shallot|Shallot]] 18:00, 19 Oct 2003 (UTC)

5172 +++$+++ Anna Frodesiak +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5172 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-26 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.301202540E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your tireless efforts in [[honeycomb|combing]] through the ''[[Anthidium]]'' stubs, [[pollen]] up to your keyboard, and creating the bizzzzzzzzzzillion redirect pages. [[beehive|Hive]] been thinking that you are sweeter than [[honey]], and...er...okay. I'm fresh out. :)  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your tireless efforts in [[honeycomb|combing]] through the ''[[Anthidium]]'' stubs, [[pollen]] up to your keyboard, and creating the bizzzzzzzzzzillion redirect pages. [[beehive|Hive]] been thinking that you are sweeter than [[honey]], and...er...okay. I'm fresh out. :) [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak|talk]]) 22:09, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
5173 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5172 +++$+++ 5172 +++$+++ 2011-03-27 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.301258160E09 +++$+++ Thanks :) and no problem on that. --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Thanks :) and no problem on that. --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 13:36, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

267317 +++$+++ Espresso Addict +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267317 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-15 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.192494000E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse! The page is at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting\/Medicine]], but it looks like [[psychiatric abuse]] is already listed there. To list an article you just follow the instructions at the top of the page. In case you need them, the other deletion sort pages are listed at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting]]. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse! The page is at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Medicine]], but it looks like [[psychiatric abuse]] is already listed there. To list an article you just follow the instructions at the top of the page. In case you need them, the other deletion sort pages are listed at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting]]. Cheers, [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] 17:20, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
267318 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267317 +++$+++ 267317 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.192494240E09 +++$+++ I will bookmark that page. Don't know why I was so lost. Thanks! -- +++$+++ :I will bookmark that page. Don't know why I was so lost. Thanks! --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

5174 +++$+++ Tomwsulcer +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5174 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-28 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.301376240E09 +++$+++ Wondering if you might advise about captions for other Philippine desserts [[Philippine_cuisine#Desserts|here]]. I took pictures of them but I dont' know much about them other than I ''wanted'' to eat them but didn't have the money at the time. Thanks for your help on bibingka.-- +++$+++ Wondering if you might advise about captions for other Philippine desserts [[Philippine_cuisine#Desserts|here]]. I took pictures of them but I dont' know much about them other than I ''wanted'' to eat them but didn't have the money at the time. Thanks for your help on bibingka.--[[User:Tomwsulcer|Tomwsulcer]] ([[User talk:Tomwsulcer|talk]]) 22:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
5175 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5174 +++$+++ 5174 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.301376300E09 +++$+++ Will do. :) Though some of them may be unfamiliar to me (different names in different languages\/islands\/regions here), but I'll try.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Will do. :) Though some of them may be unfamiliar to me (different names in different languages/islands/regions here), but I'll try.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 22:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
5176 +++$+++ Tomwsulcer +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5174 +++$+++ 5175 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.301377620E09 +++$+++ Thanks!-- +++$+++ ::Thanks!--[[User:Tomwsulcer|Tomwsulcer]] ([[User talk:Tomwsulcer|talk]]) 22:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
5177 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5174 +++$+++ 5176 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.301378460E09 +++$+++ Done. Might be a bit too long for the thumbs, feel free to reword. I'm also really not sure if \"Maja ube\" is the same as the dessert we call \"Ube jam\" here. I didn't mention it to be safe. And you're welcome re: bibingka. I really should write articles on all of them... but meh, a bit hard finding reliable sources on them. :) Anyway, cheers. --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::Done. Might be a bit too long for the thumbs, feel free to reword. I'm also really not sure if "Maja ube" is the same as the dessert we call "Ube jam" here. I didn't mention it to be safe. And you're welcome re: bibingka. I really should write articles on all of them... but meh, a bit hard finding reliable sources on them. :) Anyway, cheers. --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 23:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
5178 +++$+++ Tomwsulcer +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5174 +++$+++ 5177 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.301382300E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Your expertise is appreciated!-- +++$+++ ::::Thanks! Your expertise is appreciated!--[[User:Tomwsulcer|Tomwsulcer]] ([[User talk:Tomwsulcer|talk]]) 00:05, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

529464 +++$+++ Gonzo_fan2007 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-07 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.210156740E09 +++$+++ So I see you found my new article :) I was thinking of putting it up for [[WP:DYK]].  What do you think?  And if you think its good enough, would you care to help with the hook?<span style=\"white-space:nowrap\"><font face=\"Harlow Solid Italic\"> +++$+++ So I see you found my new article :) I was thinking of putting it up for [[WP:DYK]].  What do you think?  And if you think its good enough, would you care to help with the hook?<span style="white-space:nowrap"><font face="Harlow Solid Italic">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<font size="2px" color="teal"> « Gonzo fan2007</font>]] ''([[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|talk]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Gonzo_fan2007|contribs]]) @ ''</font></span>'' 03:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
529465 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529464 +++$+++ 529464 +++$+++ 2008-05-07 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.210157160E09 +++$+++ I find all (in theory) new Wisconsin articles at [[User:AlexNewArtBot\/WisconsinSearchResult]]. I was definitely thinking about DYK if enough information can be found. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I find all (in theory) new Wisconsin articles at [[User:AlexNewArtBot/WisconsinSearchResult]]. I was definitely thinking about DYK if enough information can be found. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
529466 +++$+++ Gonzo_fan2007 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529464 +++$+++ 529465 +++$+++ 2008-05-07 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.210164960E09 +++$+++ I really like your additions, I will try and find some more to expand about him (cant find his dang birth date).<span style=\"white-space:nowrap\"><font face=\"Harlow Solid Italic\"> +++$+++ ::I really like your additions, I will try and find some more to expand about him (cant find his dang birth date).<span style="white-space:nowrap"><font face="Harlow Solid Italic">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<font size="2px" color="teal"> « Gonzo fan2007</font>]] ''([[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|talk]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Gonzo_fan2007|contribs]]) @ ''</font></span>'' 05:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
529467 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529464 +++$+++ 529466 +++$+++ 2008-05-07 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.210165140E09 +++$+++ Thanks. No DYK fact jumps out at me, except I found an unusable blog that calls him the only historian in the NFL. It's probably right. Please look out for a RS. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Thanks. No DYK fact jumps out at me, except I found an unusable blog that calls him the only historian in the NFL. It's probably right. Please look out for a RS. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
529468 +++$+++ Gonzo_fan2007 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529464 +++$+++ 529467 +++$+++ 2008-05-07 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.210165380E09 +++$+++ I'll be on the lookout, if you can also try and find his birthdate, that would be great.<span style=\"white-space:nowrap\"><font face=\"Harlow Solid Italic\"> +++$+++ ::::I'll be on the lookout, if you can also try and find his birthdate, that would be great.<span style="white-space:nowrap"><font face="Harlow Solid Italic">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<font size="2px" color="teal"> « Gonzo fan2007</font>]] ''([[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|talk]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Gonzo_fan2007|contribs]]) @ ''</font></span>'' 06:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
529469 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529464 +++$+++ 529468 +++$+++ 2008-05-07 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.210165860E09 +++$+++ {{tick|18}} '''Done''' I got lucky and found his birth date quickly - on the first page of google results. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::{{tick|18}} '''Done''' I got lucky and found his birth date quickly - on the first page of google results. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 06:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
529470 +++$+++ Gonzo_fan2007 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529464 +++$+++ 529464 +++$+++ 2008-05-07 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.210165860E09 +++$+++ Ha, thanks a lot!<span style=\"white-space:nowrap\"><font face=\"Harlow Solid Italic\"> +++$+++ :Ha, thanks a lot!<span style="white-space:nowrap"><font face="Harlow Solid Italic">[[User:Gonzo_fan2007|<font size="2px" color="teal"> « Gonzo fan2007</font>]] ''([[User talk:Gonzo_fan2007|talk]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Gonzo_fan2007|contribs]]) @ ''</font></span>'' 06:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

5179 +++$+++ 71.121.31.183 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-30 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.301513100E09 +++$+++ There is information for you at [[User talk:Moray An Par]]. Please do not do anything to WP:out me again, like unnecessarily attacking me in the context of my having written an article thinking a person was put in prison in August 2010, and finding out a successful prosecution occured with a federal judgment, but that person was not yet captured, and only their husband was put in federal prison in August 2010. After discovering this, I began to edit with an IP, so as not to endanger myself. I am sure it was not your intent, but pointing out that an IP makes similar edits to an editor is not helpful. I already discussed the situation with other editors a few days ago, and began editing with an IP. My edits that you are deleting as \"cut and paste\" started off as cut and paste, and I am gradually modifying them to uniquely fit each article's topic. I do not understand your blanket deletions, when the content, even as a partial cuta and paste, is better than the content of the rest of the article. For example, in one article the content was deleted by another editor as \"individual info does not belong here\", leaving unsourced individual's info for ''others'', but not the RS info on this particular individual, who is much more famous, appearing in CBS News 60 Minutes, Washington Post, and international press. Please discuss at talk pages of those articles, and if you would, discuss the content, not me, as this may WP:Out me, and endanger me. Thanks :) [[Special:Contributions\/71.121.31.183|71.121.31.183]] ( +++$+++ There is information for you at [[User talk:Moray An Par]]. Please do not do anything to WP:out me again, like unnecessarily attacking me in the context of my having written an article thinking a person was put in prison in August 2010, and finding out a successful prosecution occured with a federal judgment, but that person was not yet captured, and only their husband was put in federal prison in August 2010. After discovering this, I began to edit with an IP, so as not to endanger myself. I am sure it was not your intent, but pointing out that an IP makes similar edits to an editor is not helpful. I already discussed the situation with other editors a few days ago, and began editing with an IP. My edits that you are deleting as "cut and paste" started off as cut and paste, and I am gradually modifying them to uniquely fit each article's topic. I do not understand your blanket deletions, when the content, even as a partial cuta and paste, is better than the content of the rest of the article. For example, in one article the content was deleted by another editor as "individual info does not belong here", leaving unsourced individual's info for ''others'', but not the RS info on this particular individual, who is much more famous, appearing in CBS News 60 Minutes, Washington Post, and international press. Please discuss at talk pages of those articles, and if you would, discuss the content, not me, as this may WP:Out me, and endanger me. Thanks :) [[Special:Contributions/71.121.31.183|71.121.31.183]] ([[User talk:71.121.31.183|talk]]) 12:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
5180 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5179 +++$+++ 5179 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.301514360E09 +++$+++ I have no interest in the subject, and I'd rather not get drawn into this. So if you can fix the problems you've caused, I will be grateful. Otherwise, I really have no choice but to ask for admin help.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :I have no interest in the subject, and I'd rather not get drawn into this. So if you can fix the problems you've caused, I will be grateful. Otherwise, I really have no choice but to ask for admin help.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 12:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
5181 +++$+++ 71.121.31.183 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5179 +++$+++ 5180 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.301521320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the thoughtful response. Regarding scandal mongering, I, and others, removed the circular linking and overlinking. I am trying to consider your \"obsession over it\" comment in a ''more general context'' regarding edits I made in other unrelated articles I have worked on, such as the articles on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Traditional_Chinese_medicine&offset=20110305163515&limit=500&action=history Traditional Chinese medicine], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Louis_Lesser&offset=20091123171032&limit=500&action=history Louis Lesser]], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Acupuncture&offset=20110204024155&limit=500&action=history Acupuncture], and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Acupuncture&limit=500&action=history Acupunture]. It is hard to be self-critical and to notice one's own obsessions gradually developed by step by step edits in an [[WP:FROG]] kind of manner, but I am trying follwing yours and others' comments. One may lose neutrality when one reads about conning the hardest hit of the impoverished in Bangladesh and Philippines (those facing bankrupcy) in order to buy the largest home in Beverly Hills, using a method of operation of pretense to Catholicism and a complete and utter reversal of \"Mother Theresa in Bangladesh\" and \"Nobel prize for assisting Bangladeshis with microfinancing in Bangladesh\" with the abuses of these peoples by this woman, then getting actually personally frightened after discovering that the recent prison conviction was only for the husband, with her and her underlings still on the loose. But I am trying as best to maintatin NPOV, and will try to keep in mind all comments by editors. [[Special:Contributions\/71.121.31.183|71.121.31.183]] ( +++$+++ ::Thanks for the thoughtful response. Regarding scandal mongering, I, and others, removed the circular linking and overlinking. I am trying to consider your "obsession over it" comment in a ''more general context'' regarding edits I made in other unrelated articles I have worked on, such as the articles on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Traditional_Chinese_medicine&offset=20110305163515&limit=500&action=history Traditional Chinese medicine], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Louis_Lesser&offset=20091123171032&limit=500&action=history Louis Lesser]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acupuncture&offset=20110204024155&limit=500&action=history Acupuncture], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acupuncture&limit=500&action=history Acupunture]. It is hard to be self-critical and to notice one's own obsessions gradually developed by step by step edits in an [[WP:FROG]] kind of manner, but I am trying follwing yours and others' comments. One may lose neutrality when one reads about conning the hardest hit of the impoverished in Bangladesh and Philippines (those facing bankrupcy) in order to buy the largest home in Beverly Hills, using a method of operation of pretense to Catholicism and a complete and utter reversal of "Mother Theresa in Bangladesh" and "Nobel prize for assisting Bangladeshis with microfinancing in Bangladesh" with the abuses of these peoples by this woman, then getting actually personally frightened after discovering that the recent prison conviction was only for the husband, with her and her underlings still on the loose. But I am trying as best to maintatin NPOV, and will try to keep in mind all comments by editors. [[Special:Contributions/71.121.31.183|71.121.31.183]] ([[User talk:71.121.31.183|talk]]) 14:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
5182 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5179 +++$+++ 5181 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.301522640E09 +++$+++ Have you removed your additions to other articles yet? That's all I really need to know right now. The article itself can be fixed, but if they're scattered all over wikipedia in extremely unlikely places, the problem becomes much more than simple NPOV. --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::Have you removed your additions to other articles yet? That's all I really need to know right now. The article itself can be fixed, but if they're scattered all over wikipedia in extremely unlikely places, the problem becomes much more than simple NPOV. --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 15:04, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

267325 +++$+++ PalaceGuard008 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267325 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-17 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.192655340E09 +++$+++ I have quoted tonnes of sources - and you have too -- that show that \"Caisson\" is the English word for \"zaojing\". You have not quoted a single source that ''says it is not''. If you have a bunch of reliable sources on the one hand supporting a proposition, and ''no reliable sources'' on the other hand denying it, then the proposition must stand, as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Cheers,  +++$+++ I have quoted tonnes of sources - and you have too -- that show that "Caisson" is the English word for "zaojing". You have not quoted a single source that ''says it is not''. If you have a bunch of reliable sources on the one hand supporting a proposition, and ''no reliable sources'' on the other hand denying it, then the proposition must stand, as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Cheers, [[User:PalaceGuard008|PalaceGuard008]] ([[User_Talk:PalaceGuard008|Talk]]) 14:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
267326 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267325 +++$+++ 267325 +++$+++ 2007-10-17 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.192659660E09 +++$+++ Checked the link you gave above and it does not mention anything relevant to this discussion that I can see. Cheers. -- +++$+++ :Checked the link you gave above and it does not mention anything relevant to this discussion that I can see. Cheers. --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 15:21, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

529471 +++$+++ GaryColemanFan +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-07 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.210194720E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just wanted to thank you for your review of this article. Your comments were helpful, and the article is definitely improved because of them. I've never asked someone directly to review an article before, but it's really hard to find anyone willing to review wrestling article, so I really appreciate your willingness to take the review. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi, I just wanted to thank you for your review of this article. Your comments were helpful, and the article is definitely improved because of them. I've never asked someone directly to review an article before, but it's really hard to find anyone willing to review wrestling article, so I really appreciate your willingness to take the review. Thanks, [[User:GaryColemanFan|GaryColemanFan]] ([[User talk:GaryColemanFan|talk]]) 14:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
529472 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529471 +++$+++ 529471 +++$+++ 2008-05-07 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.210195260E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Your WikiProject is being very productive writing GA articles right now! It's hard to find someone who would review racing articles too. I'm sure that I'll be asking you to peer review an article that I've been working on. In fact, I think that I should ask you for a FA PR on [[Alan Kulwicki]] as soon as I get done improving the quality of the sources. I know just enough about wrestling to be able to understand most terms, but I can see what a non-fan might not understand. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. Your WikiProject is being very productive writing GA articles right now! It's hard to find someone who would review racing articles too. I'm sure that I'll be asking you to peer review an article that I've been working on. In fact, I think that I should ask you for a FA PR on [[Alan Kulwicki]] as soon as I get done improving the quality of the sources. I know just enough about wrestling to be able to understand most terms, but I can see what a non-fan might not understand. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 14:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

529473 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-08 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.210282380E09 +++$+++ Thanks! To be absolutely fair his earlier edits to Rumble Fighter seemed serious; maybe he left the pc untended?    +++$+++ Thanks! To be absolutely fair his earlier edits to Rumble Fighter seemed serious; maybe he left the pc untended?   [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 14:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
529474 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529473 +++$+++ 529473 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.210283340E09 +++$+++ Thanks again.  +++$+++ *Thanks again. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 14:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

267330 +++$+++ PalaceGuard008 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-18 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.192694400E09 +++$+++ Please answer that question. This discussion cannot progress until it is clearly answered. -- +++$+++ Please answer that question. This discussion cannot progress until it is clearly answered. --[[User:PalaceGuard008|PalaceGuard008]] ([[User_Talk:PalaceGuard008|Talk]]) 01:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
267331 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267330 +++$+++ 267330 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.192737720E09 +++$+++ I think they both should be merged into [[coffer]], as that is what [[Caisson (Asian architecture)]] clearly describes. On the Wiki Commons, the word \"caisson\" and \"coffer\" is used interchangeably for the ceiling type described in [[Caisson (Asian architecture)]]. Used in this sense, [[zaojing]] is just another word for [[coffer]].  -- +++$+++ :I think they both should be merged into [[coffer]], as that is what [[Caisson (Asian architecture)]] clearly describes. On the Wiki Commons, the word "caisson" and "coffer" is used interchangeably for the ceiling type described in [[Caisson (Asian architecture)]]. Used in this sense, [[zaojing]] is just another word for [[coffer]].  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

5187 +++$+++ Djmaschek +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5187 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-08 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.302257400E09 +++$+++ I guess I am dyslexic when it comes to Polish rivers. Thanks for pointing out that the spelling is [[Wkra]] not Wrka.  +++$+++ I guess I am dyslexic when it comes to Polish rivers. Thanks for pointing out that the spelling is [[Wkra]] not Wrka. [[User:Djmaschek|Djmaschek]] ([[User talk:Djmaschek|talk]]) 03:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
5188 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5187 +++$+++ 5187 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.302260940E09 +++$+++ Heh, you're welcome. :) I'm betting it's because the letter order 'w-r-k' is more familiar to English speakers in the word 'Work'. Brain sees the letters, automatically orders them in the most familiar sequence. --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Heh, you're welcome. :) I'm betting it's because the letter order 'w-r-k' is more familiar to English speakers in the word 'Work'. Brain sees the letters, automatically orders them in the most familiar sequence. --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 04:09, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

5189 +++$+++ SunCreator +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5189 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-09 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.302380820E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For the great work you've done improving [[Black marsh turtle]], [[Cyclemys]] and other [[Special:RecentChangesLinked\/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Turtles\/Articles|turtle articles]]. Regards,  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For the great work you've done improving [[Black marsh turtle]], [[Cyclemys]] and other [[Special:RecentChangesLinked/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Turtles/Articles|turtle articles]]. Regards, [[User:SunCreator|SunCreator]] <sup>([[User talk:SunCreator|talk]])</sup> 13:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
5190 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5189 +++$+++ 5189 +++$+++ 2011-04-09 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.302381480E09 +++$+++ Thank you. :) Just taking a breather, heh. Will add a proper lead to ''[[Cyclemys]]'' when I can. Plus continue expanding the ''[[Siebenrockiella]]'' articles.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Thank you. :) Just taking a breather, heh. Will add a proper lead to ''[[Cyclemys]]'' when I can. Plus continue expanding the ''[[Siebenrockiella]]'' articles.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 13:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

5192 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-17 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.303064460E09 +++$+++ Hey, I'd like to put forward a proposal for a middle ground proposal for pending changes, one of the things I haven't figured out in my head is some reviewing criteria. As you've pointed out your dis-satisfaction with the reviewing criteria for pending changes, would you be happy to come up with some? Cheers. --  +++$+++ Hey, I'd like to put forward a proposal for a middle ground proposal for pending changes, one of the things I haven't figured out in my head is some reviewing criteria. As you've pointed out your dis-satisfaction with the reviewing criteria for pending changes, would you be happy to come up with some? Cheers. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 11:21, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
5193 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5192 +++$+++ 5192 +++$+++ 2011-04-22 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.303479900E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) Also please sign your messages by clicking the signature and timestamp button on the edit bar at the end of your messages (it will show up as <code><nowiki>--~~~~<\/nowiki><\/code>). Location of the button shown on picture at the right.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. :) Also please sign your messages by clicking the signature and timestamp button on the edit bar at the end of your messages (it will show up as <code><nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki></code>). Location of the button shown on picture at the right.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#788">Obsidi<span style="color:#000">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 06:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

5194 +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5194 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-22 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.303479000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for removing the watermark on this image. Part of the \"H\" in the right hand identification mark is still there though. Any way to zap it? thanks! \u2013&nbsp;<i><font color=\"#06266f\">Ker\u03b1u<\/font><font color=\"#1240AB\">no\u03c2co<\/font><font color=\"#4671DS\">pia<\/font><font color=\"#A60000\"><sup>\u25c1<\/sup><\/font><sub><font color=\"#5E1FFF\"> +++$+++ Thanks for removing the watermark on this image. Part of the "H" in the right hand identification mark is still there though. Any way to zap it? thanks! –&nbsp;<i><font color="#06266f">Kerαu</font><font color="#1240AB">noςco</font><font color="#4671DS">pia</font><font color="#A60000"><sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User:Keraunoscopia|gala]][[User talk:Keraunoscopia|xies]]</font></sub></i> 06:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
5195 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5194 +++$+++ 5194 +++$+++ 2011-04-22 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.303479240E09 +++$+++ Oop, sorry, missed that. Do you have any of these in higher resolutions? It's a bit harder to clean them up as tiny images, heh. But yeah, uploaded a new version.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Oop, sorry, missed that. Do you have any of these in higher resolutions? It's a bit harder to clean them up as tiny images, heh. But yeah, uploaded a new version.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#788">Obsidi<span style="color:#000">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 06:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
5196 +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5194 +++$+++ 5195 +++$+++ 2011-04-22 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.303481580E09 +++$+++ Isn't that annoying? They're ridiculously small, even for fair-use. For a couple of the Australian War Memorial images, I have gone back to the originating website and found higher quality images and even larger images (though only slightly), but the watermarking is usually different and slightly less work to remove. For other war images, I've begun to find online PDF files of these images that are much larger, but I haven't put those in the Top 4. I may just throw them in a regular request since the instructions to get the PDF is a little lengthy. So, the answer is yes and no? Some of them, I can find larger images, some of them, I can't. \u2013&nbsp;<i><font color=\"#06266f\">Ker\u03b1u<\/font><font color=\"#1240AB\">no\u03c2co<\/font><font color=\"#4671DS\">pia<\/font><font color=\"#A60000\"><sup>\u25c1<\/sup><\/font><sub><font color=\"#5E1FFF\"> +++$+++ ::Isn't that annoying? They're ridiculously small, even for fair-use. For a couple of the Australian War Memorial images, I have gone back to the originating website and found higher quality images and even larger images (though only slightly), but the watermarking is usually different and slightly less work to remove. For other war images, I've begun to find online PDF files of these images that are much larger, but I haven't put those in the Top 4. I may just throw them in a regular request since the instructions to get the PDF is a little lengthy. So, the answer is yes and no? Some of them, I can find larger images, some of them, I can't. –&nbsp;<i><font color="#06266f">Kerαu</font><font color="#1240AB">noςco</font><font color="#4671DS">pia</font><font color="#A60000"><sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User:Keraunoscopia|gala]][[User talk:Keraunoscopia|xies]]</font></sub></i> 07:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
5197 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5194 +++$+++ 5196 +++$+++ 2011-04-22 09:06:00 +++$+++ 1.303488360E09 +++$+++ Aye, I've uploaded my share of PD-old war images captured from digitized 19th to early 20th century books myself. I use [[Foxit Reader]], it has a tool for quickly snapshotting images in a given page in a PDF file. I can then paste it into an image editing program like GIMP or Photoshop. It's alright I guess, if there are really no other versions available.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::Aye, I've uploaded my share of PD-old war images captured from digitized 19th to early 20th century books myself. I use [[Foxit Reader]], it has a tool for quickly snapshotting images in a given page in a PDF file. I can then paste it into an image editing program like GIMP or Photoshop. It's alright I guess, if there are really no other versions available.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#788">Obsidi<span style="color:#000">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 09:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

529484 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-09 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.210363560E09 +++$+++ Hi- About your suggestion about User:Dual Freq and the WikiProject Wisconsin Bardstar I am all in favor of awarding Dual Freq this. However, I don't have the computer know how to this. I tried awarding User:OrangeMike WikiLove to cheer him up because of the vandalism on his user page but this turn out to be a disaster. Therefore, I proposed you make the presentation on behalf of both of us-You have my OK to do this.Thanks- +++$+++ Hi- About your suggestion about User:Dual Freq and the WikiProject Wisconsin Bardstar I am all in favor of awarding Dual Freq this. However, I don't have the computer know how to this. I tried awarding User:OrangeMike WikiLove to cheer him up because of the vandalism on his user page but this turn out to be a disaster. Therefore, I proposed you make the presentation on behalf of both of us-You have my OK to do this.Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
529485 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529484 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-10 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.210442400E09 +++$+++ I took care of it and the Wisconsin Barnstar took hold!Many thanks for your patient and kindness. +++$+++ ::I took care of it and the Wisconsin Barnstar took hold!Many thanks for your patient and kindness.[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 11:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

267341 +++$+++ NRPanikker +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-20 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.192869900E09 +++$+++ I don't think it matters very much, but all ten Rorschach cards are already available on-line on a Spanish website linked to the Wikipedia Rorschach article. I have seen them on the web before, many times. Clinical secrets like these have brief lives.  +++$+++ I don't think it matters very much, but all ten Rorschach cards are already available on-line on a Spanish website linked to the Wikipedia Rorschach article. I have seen them on the web before, many times. Clinical secrets like these have brief lives. [[User:NRPanikker|NRPanikker]] 01:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
267342 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267341 +++$+++ 267341 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.192870380E09 +++$+++ No, I don't expect you to understand. It has to do with the ethically standards of a professional, licensed psychologist. Perhaps you belong to a profession that has ethical standards, that although violating them is not against the law, you as a professional could not ethically condone. It is an ethical question for psychologists so it will make any psychologist queasy to see that done. I know what you are saying is true. It is easily available in unauthorized places, so is pornography and I guess wikipedia has no standards about that either. People differ.  -- +++$+++ :No, I don't expect you to understand. It has to do with the ethically standards of a professional, licensed psychologist. Perhaps you belong to a profession that has ethical standards, that although violating them is not against the law, you as a professional could not ethically condone. It is an ethical question for psychologists so it will make any psychologist queasy to see that done. I know what you are saying is true. It is easily available in unauthorized places, so is pornography and I guess wikipedia has no standards about that either. People differ.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 01:53, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

5198 +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-22 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.303481880E09 +++$+++ This is just extra info on the non-free images thing: If you look at the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab\/Photography_workshop\/Top_4&curid=25822762&action=history history] of the Top 4, you'll see {{User|\u0394}} removed two images because they violated NFCC guidelines. My bad, since I'd forgotten. I replaced them with two free images, but I really wanted to figure out how to get non-free images into the Top 4. The image to be worked on is listed in the <code>|unfree=<\/code> parameter of the PENDING and DONE templates. But without an image of some sort, the templates don't even show up in the gallery! Thus: the \xa9 that you recommended. It's perfect. I just hope the other regulars don't get confused about it. This may be a new situation? \u2013&nbsp;<i><font color=\"#06266f\">Ker\u03b1u<\/font><font color=\"#1240AB\">no\u03c2co<\/font><font color=\"#4671DS\">pia<\/font><font color=\"#A60000\"><sup>\u25c1<\/sup><\/font><sub><font color=\"#5E1FFF\"> +++$+++ This is just extra info on the non-free images thing: If you look at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab/Photography_workshop/Top_4&curid=25822762&action=history history] of the Top 4, you'll see {{User|Δ}} removed two images because they violated NFCC guidelines. My bad, since I'd forgotten. I replaced them with two free images, but I really wanted to figure out how to get non-free images into the Top 4. The image to be worked on is listed in the <code>|unfree=</code> parameter of the PENDING and DONE templates. But without an image of some sort, the templates don't even show up in the gallery! Thus: the © that you recommended. It's perfect. I just hope the other regulars don't get confused about it. This may be a new situation? –&nbsp;<i><font color="#06266f">Kerαu</font><font color="#1240AB">noςco</font><font color="#4671DS">pia</font><font color="#A60000"><sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User:Keraunoscopia|gala]][[User talk:Keraunoscopia|xies]]</font></sub></i> 07:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
5199 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5198 +++$+++ 5198 +++$+++ 2011-04-22 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.303488180E09 +++$+++ Ah, I misunderstood. You'd probably have to link it without having it show up, I guess, by using <code><nowiki>[[:File:Filename.fileextension]]<\/nowiki><\/code>. Otherwise, no idea. The graphic labs use templates for the jobs.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Ah, I misunderstood. You'd probably have to link it without having it show up, I guess, by using <code><nowiki>[[:File:Filename.fileextension]]</nowiki></code>. Otherwise, no idea. The graphic labs use templates for the jobs.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#788">Obsidi<span style="color:#000">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 09:03, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

267343 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-20 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.192909860E09 +++$+++ Hurrah! Gone at last. +++$+++ Hurrah! Gone at last.[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 12:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
267344 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267343 +++$+++ 267343 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.192910520E09 +++$+++ Yes! A miracle. But do not cease vigilance as the POV psychiatry people are not going to stop that easily.  -- +++$+++ :Yes! A miracle. But do not cease vigilance as the POV psychiatry people are not going to stop that easily.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

5200 +++$+++  +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5200 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-23 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.303542120E09 +++$+++ }}  [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 00:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ }}  [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 00:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
5201 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5200 +++$+++ 5200 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.303623840E09 +++$+++ You may be interested to know though, that the [[Genus|generic name]] for banana - ''[[Musa]]'' - probably came from Sanskrit, through Arabic ''muuz'' or ''muez''.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :You may be interested to know though, that the [[Genus|generic name]] for banana - ''[[Musa]]'' - probably came from Sanskrit, through Arabic ''muuz'' or ''muez''.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#788">Obsidi<span style="color:#000">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 22:44, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

267345 +++$+++ Butseriouslyfolks +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267345 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-20 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.192878240E09 +++$+++ Please continue to contribute here, even if an article is tagged, and please do not throw the baby that is this helpful bot out with the bathwater of the occasional unwarranted tags.  Thank you!!! --'''<span style=\"background:Black;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ Please continue to contribute here, even if an article is tagged, and please do not throw the baby that is this helpful bot out with the bathwater of the occasional unwarranted tags.  Thank you!!! --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Bsf|<font color="White">But</font>]]|[[User talk:Bsf|<font color="White">seriously</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Butseriouslyfolks|<font color="White">folks</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 04:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
267346 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267345 +++$+++ 267345 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.192913220E09 +++$+++ I am not complaining about the general concept of the bot. I am complaining about the consistent tagging within one minute of the creating of an article. I am also complaining that it accused me of copyvio of a page that was itself a copyvio. That page was a copvio page of U.S. Supreme Court decisions on a student page in the U.K. I gave a footnote reference to the Supreme Court wording. What is the reasoning of the bot to do that? Why can't the bot wait more than one minute of article creating?   I thought there were rules against instantly tagging a possibly good faith article  on wikipedia within the same minute it is created. I will have to figure out a way to trick the bot if I am going to create any more U.S. Supreme Court decision articles.  -- +++$+++ :I am not complaining about the general concept of the bot. I am complaining about the consistent tagging within one minute of the creating of an article. I am also complaining that it accused me of copyvio of a page that was itself a copyvio. That page was a copvio page of U.S. Supreme Court decisions on a student page in the U.K. I gave a footnote reference to the Supreme Court wording. What is the reasoning of the bot to do that? Why can't the bot wait more than one minute of article creating?   I thought there were rules against instantly tagging a possibly good faith article  on wikipedia within the same minute it is created. I will have to figure out a way to trick the bot if I am going to create any more U.S. Supreme Court decision articles.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
267347 +++$+++ Iamunknown +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267345 +++$+++ 267346 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.192914840E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I'm sorry to hear that you are frustrated with the bot.  Several other established editors have complained about it.  I recommended at WP:AN\/I that the bot not tag the article and not notify the article creator, but instead list the page at [[WP:SCV]] and let the editors their make an informed (human) judgment.  If that were the case, then making Supreme Court decision articles might be less stressful.  :)  This is the second time that I have recommended, so we'll see what happens.  :)  -- +++$+++ :: Mattisse, I'm sorry to hear that you are frustrated with the bot.  Several other established editors have complained about it.  I recommended at WP:AN/I that the bot not tag the article and not notify the article creator, but instead list the page at [[WP:SCV]] and let the editors their make an informed (human) judgment.  If that were the case, then making Supreme Court decision articles might be less stressful.  :)  This is the second time that I have recommended, so we'll see what happens.  :)  --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 14:14, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
267348 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267345 +++$+++ 267347 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.192915080E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I'm glad to hear there are others and it is not just me. And I do not understanding the reasoning behind tagging a footnote referenced  article within one minute of it's creation. -- +++$+++ :::Thanks! I'm glad to hear there are others and it is not just me. And I do not understanding the reasoning behind tagging a footnote referenced  article within one minute of it's creation. --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

5202 +++$+++ Naraht +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5202 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-24 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.303713480E09 +++$+++ I'm just glad that Wikipedia tends to stick to US & UK versions on English only. In dealing with Filipinos, their English tends to slide in some interesting ways and it seems like most people speak in a mix of Tagalog and English... +++$+++ I'm just glad that Wikipedia tends to stick to US & UK versions on English only. In dealing with Filipinos, their English tends to slide in some interesting ways and it seems like most people speak in a mix of Tagalog and English...[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 23:38, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
5203 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5202 +++$+++ 5202 +++$+++ 2011-04-24 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.303714380E09 +++$+++ LOL watch it, mister. :P I'm Filipino actually, but yep, very true. Rarely used English words in the Philippines with homophones tend to result in rather hilarious malapropisms. I'm actually thinking 'Full-pledged' is a valid word in the [[Philippine English]] dialect. And yes, it's far more common for people to combine two or more languages in everyday speech (partly because the native versions of the words are extremely clunky or archaic and very rare). Started with Spanish when a lot of the Spanish vocabulary got integrated into Filipino languages (not just Tagalog)--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :LOL watch it, mister. :P I'm Filipino actually, but yep, very true. Rarely used English words in the Philippines with homophones tend to result in rather hilarious malapropisms. I'm actually thinking 'Full-pledged' is a valid word in the [[Philippine English]] dialect. And yes, it's far more common for people to combine two or more languages in everyday speech (partly because the native versions of the words are extremely clunky or archaic and very rare). Started with Spanish when a lot of the Spanish vocabulary got integrated into Filipino languages (not just Tagalog)--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#788">Obsidi<span style="color:#000">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 23:53, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
5204 +++$+++ Naraht +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5202 +++$+++ 5203 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.303721280E09 +++$+++ That's what we need, a wikipedia in [[Philippine English]]. :) I've learned at least one word in Spanish which seems to have made it into the Philippine Dialects that has come from dealing with the page on Fraternities and Sororities in the Philippines: Basura (which seems to show up about once a month in the vandalism). I also read a Filipino Fraternity bulletin board www.pinoyfraternity.com . I'm an Alpha Phi Omega brother in the USA. (So yeah, COI) +++$+++ ::That's what we need, a wikipedia in [[Philippine English]]. :) I've learned at least one word in Spanish which seems to have made it into the Philippine Dialects that has come from dealing with the page on Fraternities and Sororities in the Philippines: Basura (which seems to show up about once a month in the vandalism). I also read a Filipino Fraternity bulletin board www.pinoyfraternity.com . I'm an Alpha Phi Omega brother in the USA. (So yeah, COI)[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 01:48, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
5205 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5202 +++$+++ 5204 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 08:15:00 +++$+++ 1.303744500E09 +++$+++ And yeah, COI, but who cares as long as you know the policies concerning NPOV. :) --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::And yeah, COI, but who cares as long as you know the policies concerning NPOV. :) --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#788">Obsidi<span style="color:#000">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 08:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
5206 +++$+++ Naraht +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5202 +++$+++ 5205 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.303758600E09 +++$+++ Yup. I figure if I go just as nuts on Fraternities that I'm not a member of, I'm OK. And I really think I could make a complete article for the Oblation Run out of the Manila Bulletin and local news sources. +++$+++ ::::Yup. I figure if I go just as nuts on Fraternities that I'm not a member of, I'm OK. And I really think I could make a complete article for the Oblation Run out of the Manila Bulletin and local news sources.[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 12:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
5207 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5202 +++$+++ 5206 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.303764720E09 +++$+++ Yep. It's notable enough to merit one really. And yeah... Marcos' \"Bagong Lipunan\" (New Society) movement was a bit too successful. Serious revisionism right there. I don't even trust our history books anymore, much less our school textbooks. All glowing praises for national heroes and whatnot, with the exploits of, say, [[Lapu-Lapu]] being narrated down to exactly how he killed Magellan LOL. Impossible, to say the least. And IMO, the move to 'simplify' the Filipino alphabet by removing all traces of 'foreign' consonants (f, v, z, c, etc.) just resulted in a very ugly language (and schoolchildren used to spelling things exactly as they hear them). If they could have resurrected the long dead [[Baybayin]] system of writing (which only had 3 vowels and 15 consonants), they would have. And the worst thing was, it was done mostly by Tagalogs with little to no input from the (then) majority Visayan language speakers. Meh.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::::Yep. It's notable enough to merit one really. And yeah... Marcos' "Bagong Lipunan" (New Society) movement was a bit too successful. Serious revisionism right there. I don't even trust our history books anymore, much less our school textbooks. All glowing praises for national heroes and whatnot, with the exploits of, say, [[Lapu-Lapu]] being narrated down to exactly how he killed Magellan LOL. Impossible, to say the least. And IMO, the move to 'simplify' the Filipino alphabet by removing all traces of 'foreign' consonants (f, v, z, c, etc.) just resulted in a very ugly language (and schoolchildren used to spelling things exactly as they hear them). If they could have resurrected the long dead [[Baybayin]] system of writing (which only had 3 vowels and 15 consonants), they would have. And the worst thing was, it was done mostly by Tagalogs with little to no input from the (then) majority Visayan language speakers. Meh.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#788">Obsidi<span style="color:#000">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 13:52, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
5208 +++$+++ Naraht +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5202 +++$+++ 5207 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.303766220E09 +++$+++ Glad you think so. :) Surprised that the revisionism wasn't reverse under Corazon Aquino. I wouldn't mind if they had gotten rid of the \"Ph\" entirely in favor of an F.  Not familiar with Baybayin. I think the Philippines would have done better if they'd gone with India's idea, take English as the official language and leave all of the other languages alone. BTW, I'd love to see an alternate history where the Philippines get the same treatment as Cuba. One naval base in perpetuity and otherwise immediate independence in the early 1900s. +++$+++ ::::::Glad you think so. :) Surprised that the revisionism wasn't reverse under Corazon Aquino. I wouldn't mind if they had gotten rid of the "Ph" entirely in favor of an F.  Not familiar with Baybayin. I think the Philippines would have done better if they'd gone with India's idea, take English as the official language and leave all of the other languages alone. BTW, I'd love to see an alternate history where the Philippines get the same treatment as Cuba. One naval base in perpetuity and otherwise immediate independence in the early 1900s.[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 14:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

529492 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-16 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.210966020E09 +++$+++ I don't think I'll load an update for a day or two though. I'll probably play around in the admin sandbox for a while, until I start feeling more comfortable with the tools :)  +++$+++ I don't think I'll load an update for a day or two though. I'll probably play around in the admin sandbox for a while, until I start feeling more comfortable with the tools :) [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 12:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
529493 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529492 +++$+++ 529492 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.210966500E09 +++$+++ That's a great idea. I was careful when I started. There's no rush. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :That's a great idea. I was careful when I started. There's no rush. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:35, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

267349 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267349 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-20 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.192909860E09 +++$+++ Hurrah! Gone at last. +++$+++ Hurrah! Gone at last.[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 12:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
267350 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267349 +++$+++ 267349 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.192910520E09 +++$+++ Yes! A miracle. But do not cease vigilance as the POV psychiatry people are not going to stop that easily.  -- +++$+++ :Yes! A miracle. But do not cease vigilance as the POV psychiatry people are not going to stop that easily.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

529494 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-17 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.211043060E09 +++$+++ I was planning to hand you a six-pack but since I couldn't find one, I'm just shouting you to a beer instead. Enjoy!  +++$+++ I was planning to hand you a six-pack but since I couldn't find one, I'm just shouting you to a beer instead. Enjoy! [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 09:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
529495 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529494 +++$+++ 529494 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.211050740E09 +++$+++ Wow, I didn't know that you found me so helpful. You're welcome! :)))  '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Wow, I didn't know that you found me so helpful. You're welcome! :)))  '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 11:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

481465 +++$+++ Alai +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ 481465 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-10 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.142036580E09 +++$+++ I'm somewhat relieved to see that I really ''had'' proposed US-skatingbio-;  thought for a moment I was losing it even more than usual!   +++$+++ I'm somewhat relieved to see that I really ''had'' proposed US-skatingbio-;  thought for a moment I was losing it even more than usual!  [[User:Alai|Alai]] 16:23, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
481466 +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ 481465 +++$+++ 481465 +++$+++ 2006-03-10 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.142054400E09 +++$+++ Manual counting - I just finished the category last night. I had spot-checked a few common names before, and during the actual count, chose about ten-twelve categories that seemed to have a lot of stubs. Of them, the only ones that came close to reaching something near threshold were figure skaters and architects (which I listed), photographers, and tennis players. (I still need to go through the parent categories for the last two.) There are probably more ways to sort that I didn't note.  +++$+++ :Manual counting - I just finished the category last night. I had spot-checked a few common names before, and during the actual count, chose about ten-twelve categories that seemed to have a lot of stubs. Of them, the only ones that came close to reaching something near threshold were figure skaters and architects (which I listed), photographers, and tennis players. (I still need to go through the parent categories for the last two.) There are probably more ways to sort that I didn't note. [[User:Crystallina|Crystallina]] 21:20, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
481467 +++$+++ Alai +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ 481465 +++$+++ 481466 +++$+++ 2006-03-10 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.142061960E09 +++$+++ I'd noticed that the \"tennisbios\" were creeping up, too.  I have a list, which if it'd be of any interest I could readily upload, of double-stubbings in oversized categories that are close to the threshold.  (This gets very long depending on how far one is prepared to consider \"close\", naturally enough.)  Or if you find such articles, and double-stub them, that'll be useful in helping these get picked up as splittable in a count from a future db dump.   +++$+++ ::I'd noticed that the "tennisbios" were creeping up, too.  I have a list, which if it'd be of any interest I could readily upload, of double-stubbings in oversized categories that are close to the threshold.  (This gets very long depending on how far one is prepared to consider "close", naturally enough.)  Or if you find such articles, and double-stub them, that'll be useful in helping these get picked up as splittable in a count from a future db dump.  [[User:Alai|Alai]] 23:26, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

5209 +++$+++ Feezo +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-25 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.303732620E09 +++$+++ Hi Obsidian Soul, just wanted to let you know that I have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A{{PAGENAMEU}} added] the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles.  This feature should have little to no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on [[WP:NPP|new page patrollers]].  For more information on the patroller right, see [[Wikipedia:Autopatrolled]].  Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions.  Happy editing! <font style=\"font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;\"><font color=\"#BBAED0\"> +++$+++ Hi Obsidian Soul, just wanted to let you know that I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A{{PAGENAMEU}} added] the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles.  This feature should have little to no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on [[WP:NPP|new page patrollers]].  For more information on the patroller right, see [[Wikipedia:Autopatrolled]].  Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions.  Happy editing! <font style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;"><font color="#BBAED0">[[User:Feezo|Feezo]] <font size="-2">[[User_talk:Feezo|(send a signal]] | [[Special:Contributions/Feezo|watch the sky]])</font></font></font> 04:57, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
5210 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5209 +++$+++ 5209 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 08:15:00 +++$+++ 1.303744500E09 +++$+++ Er... thanks... I guess. LOL. Since it benefits other users (NPP) more, I guess it doesn't violate my self-imposed rule to actively avoid getting any special user rights.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Er... thanks... I guess. LOL. Since it benefits other users (NPP) more, I guess it doesn't violate my self-imposed rule to actively avoid getting any special user rights.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#788">Obsidi<span style="color:#000">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 08:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
5211 +++$+++ Feezo +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5209 +++$+++ 5210 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.303752540E09 +++$+++ Don't make me give you reviewer and rollbacker too! :P <font style=\"font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;\"><font color=\"#BBAED0\"> +++$+++ ::Don't make me give you reviewer and rollbacker too! :P <font style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;"><font color="#BBAED0">[[User:Feezo|Feezo]] <font size="-2">[[User_talk:Feezo|(send a signal]] | [[Special:Contributions/Feezo|watch the sky]])</font></font></font> 10:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
5212 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5209 +++$+++ 5211 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.303758240E09 +++$+++ D: You're scaring me. *runs away*-'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::D: You're scaring me. *runs away*-'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#788">Obsidi<span style="color:#000">♠</span>n</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 12:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

267354 +++$+++ JLaTondre +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-20 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.192930500E09 +++$+++ is a word for word duplicate of the source you provided (even the quotes are in the source) and it is not indicated in anyway as being a quote of the source. You appear to have reused text without marking it as a quotation. If the source is public domain, then reusing it was fine. However, you have left me confused as you have stated that the other site is violating the copyright of your source, but if it's public domain, then it's not a copyright violation. Thanks. -- +++$+++ is a word for word duplicate of the source you provided (even the quotes are in the source) and it is not indicated in anyway as being a quote of the source. You appear to have reused text without marking it as a quotation. If the source is public domain, then reusing it was fine. However, you have left me confused as you have stated that the other site is violating the copyright of your source, but if it's public domain, then it's not a copyright violation. Thanks. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] 18:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
267355 +++$+++ JLaTondre +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267354 +++$+++ 267354 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.192930800E09 +++$+++ There was no need for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Kansas_v._Hendricks&diff=165889588&oldid=165888592 this]. I suggest you read [[WP:POINT]]. bbatsell did not say it was a copyvio. He said it wasn't obvious it wasn't. And he's correct. If text matches between two sites, then investigation needs to be done to determine if there is an issue. In this case, there wasn't, but there is no way to tell without checking the status of the other site. -- +++$+++ :There was no need for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kansas_v._Hendricks&diff=165889588&oldid=165888592 this]. I suggest you read [[WP:POINT]]. bbatsell did not say it was a copyvio. He said it wasn't obvious it wasn't. And he's correct. If text matches between two sites, then investigation needs to be done to determine if there is an issue. In this case, there wasn't, but there is no way to tell without checking the status of the other site. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] 18:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
267356 +++$+++ JLaTondre +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267354 +++$+++ 267355 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.192931040E09 +++$+++ You are allowed to tag your articles as {{tl|db-author}}. However, remember that applies to only articles that you are the only contributor. If you apply it to other articles, it could be considered [[Wikipedia:Disruption|disruption]]. I think you are taking this way to seriously as no editor has accused you of copyvios and a bot is not a person. I'd suggest you take a short break and decide if this is really what you want instead of acting when you are upset. -- +++$+++ ::You are allowed to tag your articles as {{tl|db-author}}. However, remember that applies to only articles that you are the only contributor. If you apply it to other articles, it could be considered [[Wikipedia:Disruption|disruption]]. I think you are taking this way to seriously as no editor has accused you of copyvios and a bot is not a person. I'd suggest you take a short break and decide if this is really what you want instead of acting when you are upset. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] 18:44, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

267358 +++$+++ Cyborg Ninja +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-21 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.193011860E09 +++$+++ I wish to comment here, and I hope that other Wikipedians will read this. A couple of days ago I went through more of Mattisse's Supreme Court articles and noticed that many of them included parts that were copied directly from their sources, thereby committing copyvio. Mattisse has a history of disruptive use as you can see in his\/her Talk archives. Most of this is due to tagging hundreds of articles a day and trying to make a [[WP:POINT|point]]. When someone disagrees with him\/her, Mattisse resorts to claiming harassment and saying he\/she will quit Wikipedia. I believe Mattisse's history should be known when more claims of difficulty with the user come up. -  +++$+++ I wish to comment here, and I hope that other Wikipedians will read this. A couple of days ago I went through more of Mattisse's Supreme Court articles and noticed that many of them included parts that were copied directly from their sources, thereby committing copyvio. Mattisse has a history of disruptive use as you can see in his/her Talk archives. Most of this is due to tagging hundreds of articles a day and trying to make a [[WP:POINT|point]]. When someone disagrees with him/her, Mattisse resorts to claiming harassment and saying he/she will quit Wikipedia. I believe Mattisse's history should be known when more claims of difficulty with the user come up. - [[User:Cyborg Ninja|Cyborg Ninja]] 17:11, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
267359 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267358 +++$+++ 267358 +++$+++ 2007-10-21 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.193012700E09 +++$+++ Cyborg Ninja,  this is not a bulletin board for you to post messages to other editors. Please respond to comments by other editors on their talk page. Your behavior is totally inappropriate. This time I will forward your message to the other editor. Please do not post on my talk page again. -- +++$+++ :Cyborg Ninja,  this is not a bulletin board for you to post messages to other editors. Please respond to comments by other editors on their talk page. Your behavior is totally inappropriate. This time I will forward your message to the other editor. Please do not post on my talk page again. --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
267360 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267358 +++$+++ 267359 +++$+++ 2007-10-21 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.193013120E09 +++$+++ Cyborg Ninja's message has been forwarded to W.marsh. -- +++$+++ ::Cyborg Ninja's message has been forwarded to W.marsh. --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
267361 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267358 +++$+++ 267360 +++$+++ 2007-10-21 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.193031480E09 +++$+++ I don't know. For some reason I am of deep, deep interest to Cyborg Ninja. Cyborg Ninja is fascinated with everything I do!-- +++$+++ :::I don't know. For some reason I am of deep, deep interest to Cyborg Ninja. Cyborg Ninja is fascinated with everything I do!--[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 22:38, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

5215 +++$+++ Rodw +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-29 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.304123940E09 +++$+++ I just think the hook needs the word '''some''' added to explain it is not all species.&mdash;  +++$+++ I just think the hook needs the word '''some''' added to explain it is not all species.&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 17:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
5216 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5215 +++$+++ 5215 +++$+++ 2011-04-29 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.304127960E09 +++$+++ Yep, unfortunately it's a choice between making it clear that not all jewel bugs are iridescent or making it seem like not all iridescence in jewel bugs are caused by structural colors. I blame the English language. ;D hehe. Cheers and thanks for reviewing.--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Yep, unfortunately it's a choice between making it clear that not all jewel bugs are iridescent or making it seem like not all iridescence in jewel bugs are caused by structural colors. I blame the English language. ;D hehe. Cheers and thanks for reviewing.--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 18:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

529505 +++$+++ The359 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529505 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-21 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.211379480E09 +++$+++ I recall a little while back that you had posted at [[WP:SCR]] regarding photos from Grand-Am at VIR, and I had forgotten about it until recently.  I can say that there might be a few useful pictures that could be requested.  Basically, it'd be nice if we had some clear shots of a new Dallara, a new Proto-Auto Lola, and maybe even a new Coyote CC\/08 since I don't have any clear picturse of them from Daytona.  They'd be nice to add to the [[Daytona Prototype]] article.  I'll leave it to you to make the arrangements with the photographer for permission.  +++$+++ I recall a little while back that you had posted at [[WP:SCR]] regarding photos from Grand-Am at VIR, and I had forgotten about it until recently.  I can say that there might be a few useful pictures that could be requested.  Basically, it'd be nice if we had some clear shots of a new Dallara, a new Proto-Auto Lola, and maybe even a new Coyote CC/08 since I don't have any clear picturse of them from Daytona.  They'd be nice to add to the [[Daytona Prototype]] article.  I'll leave it to you to make the arrangements with the photographer for permission. [[User:The359|The359]] ([[User talk:The359|talk]]) 07:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
529506 +++$+++ The359 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529505 +++$+++ 529505 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.211411100E09 +++$+++ Here's the [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/daredevil26\/2452970503\/in\/set-72157604801284668\/ Dallara], [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/daredevil26\/2453021111\/in\/set-72157604801284668\/ Coyote], and [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/daredevil26\/2453095953\/in\/set-72157604801284668\/ Proto-Auto Lola].  +++$+++ :Here's the [http://www.flickr.com/photos/daredevil26/2452970503/in/set-72157604801284668/ Dallara], [http://www.flickr.com/photos/daredevil26/2453021111/in/set-72157604801284668/ Coyote], and [http://www.flickr.com/photos/daredevil26/2453095953/in/set-72157604801284668/ Proto-Auto Lola]. [[User:The359|The359]] ([[User talk:The359|talk]]) 16:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
529507 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529505 +++$+++ 529506 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.211417880E09 +++$+++ I asked. I never would have figured them out. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I asked. I never would have figured them out. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 17:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

5218 +++$+++ Kevmin +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-09 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.304950200E09 +++$+++ Hi Obsidian Soul, I want to apologize for the sharp nature of my comments at ToL, I didnt mean for the comment to be aimed at anyone at all and was going for helpful, but failed really badly it seems!-- +++$+++ Hi Obsidian Soul, I want to apologize for the sharp nature of my comments at ToL, I didnt mean for the comment to be aimed at anyone at all and was going for helpful, but failed really badly it seems!--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 07:10, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
5219 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5218 +++$+++ 5218 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.304950500E09 +++$+++ Nah, I apologize too. Having a bad day at the moment and I do tend to misread stuff online for the worse when I do, heh. Text doesn't convey emotion that well. And yes it did help. It's something to learn from as well now that you pointed it out. Anyway cheers. :) --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Nah, I apologize too. Having a bad day at the moment and I do tend to misread stuff online for the worse when I do, heh. Text doesn't convey emotion that well. And yes it did help. It's something to learn from as well now that you pointed it out. Anyway cheers. :) --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 07:15, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
5220 +++$+++ Kevmin +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5218 +++$+++ 5219 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.304989440E09 +++$+++ It was mostly my fault for responding in such a pointed manner, I could have worded it a lot better!- +++$+++ ::It was mostly my fault for responding in such a pointed manner, I could have worded it a lot better!-[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 18:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

5221 +++$+++ Lordarchitect +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-11 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.305121380E09 +++$+++ Please restore the article and integrate yours if you may. I will surely report you to Wikipedia and other Filipino organizations if you don't!  +++$+++ Please restore the article and integrate yours if you may. I will surely report you to Wikipedia and other Filipino organizations if you don't! [[User:Lordarchitect|Lordarchitect]] ([[User talk:Lordarchitect|talk]]) 06:43, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
5222 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5221 +++$+++ 5221 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.305124740E09 +++$+++ ''Salamat.''--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :''Salamat.''--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 07:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
5223 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5221 +++$+++ 5222 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.305124740E09 +++$+++ P.S. As for 'plagiarized', please see [[WP:OWN]]. No one owns anything on Wikipedia. The moment you wrote it on the page, you've given it away to the public. Read the disclaimers at the bottom of the edit boxes. I salvaged what I could from the previous edits though I can not, in good conscience, restore the parts about Lorenziana. Wasn't that what you wanted? <small>Also I apologize for my Tagalog. It kinda sucks. I'm Bisaya<\/small>--'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::P.S. As for 'plagiarized', please see [[WP:OWN]]. No one owns anything on Wikipedia. The moment you wrote it on the page, you've given it away to the public. Read the disclaimers at the bottom of the edit boxes. I salvaged what I could from the previous edits though I can not, in good conscience, restore the parts about Lorenziana. Wasn't that what you wanted? <small>Also I apologize for my Tagalog. It kinda sucks. I'm Bisaya</small>--'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 07:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

5224 +++$+++ Sonia +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-12 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.305203040E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Sonia&diff=428234840&oldid=428227525 Thanks] :P (I'm allergic to cats, so just as well!)  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sonia&diff=428234840&oldid=428227525 Thanks] :P (I'm allergic to cats, so just as well!) [[User talk:Sonia|<font color="#CC0099">sonia</font><font color="black">♫</font>]] 05:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
5225 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5224 +++$+++ 5224 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.305204360E09 +++$+++ Just don't poke it unless you've grown tired of a finger. ;) They eat puppies too! --'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Just don't poke it unless you've grown tired of a finger. ;) They eat puppies too! --'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 05:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

481468 +++$+++ No Guru +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ 481468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-29 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.143680220E09 +++$+++ Hello. I noticed the stub sorting you did in regards to pitchers. Excellent idea as the baseball-bio category is vary large. I put a suggestion in at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting\/Proposals#.7B.7Bbaseball-pitcher-stub.7D.7D]] to create one for catchers as well. Do you think I can consider the discussion there as sufficent to support stubs for all the other positons as well ?  +++$+++ Hello. I noticed the stub sorting you did in regards to pitchers. Excellent idea as the baseball-bio category is vary large. I put a suggestion in at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals#.7B.7Bbaseball-pitcher-stub.7D.7D]] to create one for catchers as well. Do you think I can consider the discussion there as sufficent to support stubs for all the other positons as well ? [[User:No Guru|No Guru]] 16:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
481469 +++$+++ No Guru +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ 481468 +++$+++ 481468 +++$+++ 2006-03-29 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.143687960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the feedback. I made a new request for this stub.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the feedback. I made a new request for this stub. [[User:No Guru|No Guru]] 19:06, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

5227 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5227 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-12 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.305268440E09 +++$+++ Thx; that helped bring me back to reality. Or, as close as we get. SNAFU, it's all good. And so forth. Cheers, <small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ Thx; that helped bring me back to reality. Or, as close as we get. SNAFU, it's all good. And so forth. Cheers, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 23:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
5228 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5227 +++$+++ 5227 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.305273480E09 +++$+++ Glad that was short-lived, heh. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Glad that was short-lived, heh. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 00:58, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

454084 +++$+++ CliffC +++$+++ PrimeHunter +++$+++ 454084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-25 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.301043960E09 +++$+++ Mea culpa; I misread his obit at http:\/\/query.nytimes.com\/mem\/archive\/pdf?res=FB0F13FC3E5E1A7493CAAB178ED85F408785F9 and added him to the wrong cemetery back in December.  Cheers,  +++$+++ Mea culpa; I misread his obit at http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=FB0F13FC3E5E1A7493CAAB178ED85F408785F9 and added him to the wrong cemetery back in December.  Cheers, [[User:CliffC|CliffC]] ([[User talk:CliffC|talk]]) 02:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
454085 +++$+++ PrimeHunter +++$+++ PrimeHunter +++$+++ 454084 +++$+++ 454084 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.301045280E09 +++$+++ That's OK. I'm not interested in him but responded to [[Wikipedia:New contributors' help page\/questions#DUKE ELLINGTON...MUSCIAN]].  +++$+++ :That's OK. I'm not interested in him but responded to [[Wikipedia:New contributors' help page/questions#DUKE ELLINGTON...MUSCIAN]]. [[User:PrimeHunter|PrimeHunter]] ([[User talk:PrimeHunter#top|talk]]) 02:28, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

5229 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5229 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-15 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.305461280E09 +++$+++ Thank you, for your helpful edits to the template {{tl|Sexual slang}}. Much appreciated. ;) Cheers, -- ''' +++$+++ Thank you, for your helpful edits to the template {{tl|Sexual slang}}. Much appreciated. ;) Cheers, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 05:08, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
5230 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5229 +++$+++ 5229 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.305461520E09 +++$+++ You're welcome of course but it's now working though. :\/ The white space is still there. -&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome of course but it's now working though. :/ The white space is still there. -&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 05:12, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
5231 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5229 +++$+++ 5230 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 05:50:00 +++$+++ 1.305463800E09 +++$+++ I don't see it, oh well. :P -- ''' +++$+++ ::I don't see it, oh well. :P -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 05:50, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
5232 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5229 +++$+++ 5231 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.305479340E09 +++$+++ Weird... I see [http:\/\/imgur.com\/OVzMl this]. Doesn't seem to be caused by the top templates, as it always occurs on top of {{tlx|Sexual slang}} even when I move it. Meh, nvm, it's not really that format breaking. heh --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::Weird... I see [http://imgur.com/OVzMl this]. Doesn't seem to be caused by the top templates, as it always occurs on top of {{tlx|Sexual slang}} even when I move it. Meh, nvm, it's not really that format breaking. heh --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 10:09, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

267376 +++$+++ Butseriouslyfolks +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267376 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-23 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.193190840E09 +++$+++ For other types of articles, I try to tag (or delete) them when I see them.  Yes, there is often a backlash, but I take solace in the fact that I am staying true to Wikipedia's ideals.  I think . . .  --'''<span style=\"background:Black;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ For other types of articles, I try to tag (or delete) them when I see them.  Yes, there is often a backlash, but I take solace in the fact that I am staying true to Wikipedia's ideals.  I think . . .  --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Bsf|<font color="White">But</font>]]|[[User talk:Bsf|<font color="White">seriously</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Butseriouslyfolks|<font color="White">folks</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 18:54, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
267377 +++$+++ Butseriouslyfolks +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267376 +++$+++ 267376 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.193193360E09 +++$+++ What a horrifying story!  I will try to be careful, but without being cowed by the spammers. --'''<span style=\"background:Black;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ :What a horrifying story!  I will try to be careful, but without being cowed by the spammers. --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Bsf|<font color="White">But</font>]]|[[User talk:Bsf|<font color="White">seriously</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Butseriouslyfolks|<font color="White">folks</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 19:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
267378 +++$+++ Butseriouslyfolks +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267376 +++$+++ 267377 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.193196060E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, there are some people who will take offense at the most innocuous comment.  Perhaps they have a driving need to feel relevant, and their perception that someone has taken the time and effort to slight them satisfies this need.  But you are correct -- it's generally better to remain \"professional\" with strangers online, until you get to know that they can take a joke. --'''<span style=\"background:Black;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Mattisse, there are some people who will take offense at the most innocuous comment.  Perhaps they have a driving need to feel relevant, and their perception that someone has taken the time and effort to slight them satisfies this need.  But you are correct -- it's generally better to remain "professional" with strangers online, until you get to know that they can take a joke. --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Bsf|<font color="White">But</font>]]|[[User talk:Bsf|<font color="White">seriously</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Butseriouslyfolks|<font color="White">folks</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 20:21, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
267379 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267376 +++$+++ 267378 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.193196300E09 +++$+++ Agreed! -- +++$+++ :::Agreed! --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 20:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

5233 +++$+++ MauchoEagle +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-16 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.305614580E09 +++$+++ Hey, about the article you nominated for DYK, where can ALT1 be found (I like ALT1 the best)?''<font face=\"times new roman\"> +++$+++ Hey, about the article you nominated for DYK, where can ALT1 be found (I like ALT1 the best)?''<font face="times new roman">[[User:MauchoEagle|<span style="background:#91A3B0;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">maucho</span>]][[User talk:MauchoEagle|<span style="background:#666;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">eagle</span>]]</font>'' <sub><font color="blue">([[Special:Contributions/MauchoEagle|c]])</font></sub> 23:43, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
5234 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5233 +++$+++ 5233 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.305615780E09 +++$+++ Heya, which one? Heh. I currently have 3 DYK's in the queue. ''[[Cyrtophora exanthematica]]'', ''[[Crossopriza lyoni]]'', and [[Tessaratomidae]], none of them say \"I like ALT1 the best\". Maybe you were referring to something I reviewed?--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Heya, which one? Heh. I currently have 3 DYK's in the queue. ''[[Cyrtophora exanthematica]]'', ''[[Crossopriza lyoni]]'', and [[Tessaratomidae]], none of them say "I like ALT1 the best". Maybe you were referring to something I reviewed?--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 00:03, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
5235 +++$+++ MauchoEagle +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5233 +++$+++ 5234 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.305616080E09 +++$+++ ''[[Crossopriza lyoni]]'' and I was saying that I like ALT1 the best.''<font face=\"times new roman\"> +++$+++ ::''[[Crossopriza lyoni]]'' and I was saying that I like ALT1 the best.''<font face="times new roman">[[User:MauchoEagle|<span style="background:#91A3B0;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">maucho</span>]][[User talk:MauchoEagle|<span style="background:#666;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">eagle</span>]]</font>'' <sub><font color="blue">([[Special:Contributions/MauchoEagle|c]])</font></sub> 00:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
5236 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5233 +++$+++ 5235 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.305616740E09 +++$+++ Taken from page 198 of [http:\/\/www.americanarachnology.org\/JoA_free\/JoA_v25_n2\/JoA_v25_p194.pdf this reference], second paragraph.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::Taken from page 198 of [http://www.americanarachnology.org/JoA_free/JoA_v25_n2/JoA_v25_p194.pdf this reference], second paragraph.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 00:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
5237 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5233 +++$+++ 5236 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.305616920E09 +++$+++ P.S. I like that one best as well.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::::P.S. I like that one best as well.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 00:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
5238 +++$+++ MauchoEagle +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5233 +++$+++ 5237 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.305618480E09 +++$+++ I have reviewed and accepted your DYK. ''<font face=\"times new roman\"> +++$+++ :::::I have reviewed and accepted your DYK. ''<font face="times new roman">[[User:MauchoEagle|<span style="background:#91A3B0;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">maucho</span>]][[User talk:MauchoEagle|<span style="background:#666;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">eagle</span>]]</font>'' <sub><font color="blue">([[Special:Contributions/MauchoEagle|c]])</font></sub> 00:48, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
5239 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5233 +++$+++ 5236 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.305622560E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks. :) BTW, it's not an offline source. The tick should have been green ([[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]), not [[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] which is only used if the source can not be accessed easily (e.g. paper publications or foreign language works).--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::::Ok, thanks. :) BTW, it's not an offline source. The tick should have been green ([[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]), not [[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] which is only used if the source can not be accessed easily (e.g. paper publications or foreign language works).--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 01:56, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
5240 +++$+++ MauchoEagle +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5233 +++$+++ 5239 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.305623040E09 +++$+++ I have corrected this, please excuse me I have done this a lot of times before but my head is not in the right place due to personal matters. ''<font face=\"times new roman\"> +++$+++ :::::I have corrected this, please excuse me I have done this a lot of times before but my head is not in the right place due to personal matters. ''<font face="times new roman">[[User:MauchoEagle|<span style="background:#91A3B0;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">maucho</span>]][[User talk:MauchoEagle|<span style="background:#666;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">eagle</span>]]</font>'' <sub><font color="blue">([[Special:Contributions/MauchoEagle|c]])</font></sub> 02:04, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
5241 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5233 +++$+++ 5236 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.305623160E09 +++$+++ Oh ok, heh. I assumed you were new to this, my bad. Anyway doesn't really matter as both ticks are for acceptance. Cheers and thanks.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::::Oh ok, heh. I assumed you were new to this, my bad. Anyway doesn't really matter as both ticks are for acceptance. Cheers and thanks.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 02:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

568851 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-20 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.158791640E09 +++$+++ Deleted! <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Deleted! <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''(aeropa'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''gitica)'''</font>]]</span> 15:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
568852 +++$+++ Cobaltbluetony +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568851 +++$+++ 568851 +++$+++ 2006-09-20 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.158796500E09 +++$+++ Sweet!  Thanks. -  +++$+++ :Sweet!  Thanks. - [[User:Cobaltbluetony|CobaltBlueTony]] 16:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

267381 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-01 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.193909280E09 +++$+++ I will recommend to you to get a life but I do not think you are capable of doing so.   -- +++$+++ I will recommend to you to get a life but I do not think you are capable of doing so.   --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 02:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
267382 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267381 +++$+++ 267381 +++$+++ 2007-11-01 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.193909940E09 +++$+++ I was going to add esamples from your posting on your page but they are so idiodic I will not bother. Othrs are free to look.   +++$+++ :I was going to add esamples from your posting on your page but they are so idiodic I will not bother. Othrs are free to look.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 02:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

529528 +++$+++ Buster7 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-05 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.212653400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help, Royal. I will not let him dampen my WikiExperience. I have contacted Dispute resolution.-- +++$+++ Thanks for the help, Royal. I will not let him dampen my WikiExperience. I have contacted Dispute resolution.--[[User:Buster7|Buster7]] ([[User talk:Buster7|talk]]) 01:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
529529 +++$+++ Iblardi +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529528 +++$+++ 529528 +++$+++ 2008-06-05 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.212655440E09 +++$+++ Well, Royalbroil, regarding this specific article, would you consider this ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fremont%2C_Wisconsin&diff=prev&oldid=217054089], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fremont%2C_Wisconsin&diff=217202855&oldid=217192203]) normal editorial behaviour? I have become more and more convinced that [[User:Buster7]] just isn't that serious a contributor. You might also want to read back our respective editing histories of the last week or so. I have to go and catch some sleep now.  +++$+++ :Well, Royalbroil, regarding this specific article, would you consider this ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fremont%2C_Wisconsin&diff=prev&oldid=217054089], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fremont%2C_Wisconsin&diff=217202855&oldid=217192203]) normal editorial behaviour? I have become more and more convinced that [[User:Buster7]] just isn't that serious a contributor. You might also want to read back our respective editing histories of the last week or so. I have to go and catch some sleep now. [[User:Iblardi|Iblardi]] ([[User talk:Iblardi|talk]]) 01:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

529530 +++$+++ Buster7 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529530 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-05 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.212657360E09 +++$+++ I certainly didn't mean to drag you into this silly war, Royal, but as long as your in the room. Your right, it probably was amatueristic to do________-- and continue on. I had to get to work and wanted my brother to log on, take a look, and let me know what he thought. Its a personal editing manuvuer I've used for years. It allows me to move on and then come back and fill in the blank with just the \"right' verb, etc.  BTW...I've fished the Wolf at Fremont for 40 years. This is just Iblardi's sour grapes. Being a \"rookie\" here, I'm not quiet sure what to do. I have contacted dispute resolution and I am waiting for their reply. Initially, I feared Iblardi's retaliation. He seems to be a seasoned veteran editor. I seriously question his motives, however. Our initial conflict didn't seem like much to me. What it revolved around, in between the lines was, \"Old World Stuff\"...an unfavorable joke toward my ancestry that I would not tolerate, and I told him in many \"talks\"....anyway...thanks for listening...\"see ya on 'da Wolf!\":-- +++$+++ I certainly didn't mean to drag you into this silly war, Royal, but as long as your in the room. Your right, it probably was amatueristic to do________-- and continue on. I had to get to work and wanted my brother to log on, take a look, and let me know what he thought. Its a personal editing manuvuer I've used for years. It allows me to move on and then come back and fill in the blank with just the "right' verb, etc.  BTW...I've fished the Wolf at Fremont for 40 years. This is just Iblardi's sour grapes. Being a "rookie" here, I'm not quiet sure what to do. I have contacted dispute resolution and I am waiting for their reply. Initially, I feared Iblardi's retaliation. He seems to be a seasoned veteran editor. I seriously question his motives, however. Our initial conflict didn't seem like much to me. What it revolved around, in between the lines was, "Old World Stuff"...an unfavorable joke toward my ancestry that I would not tolerate, and I told him in many "talks"....anyway...thanks for listening..."see ya on 'da Wolf!":--[[User:Buster7|Buster7]] ([[User talk:Buster7|talk]]) 02:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
529531 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529530 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-05 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.212687960E09 +++$+++ Royalbroil Thanks for replying about the 2 Fremont articles.Hopefully-I will try to end the Fremont town article to the Waupaca County template. Also my apologies to Iblardi and Buster7 if I did anything a or got caught into something. Also my apologies to you Royalbroil. Thanks- +++$+++ ::Royalbroil Thanks for replying about the 2 Fremont articles.Hopefully-I will try to end the Fremont town article to the Waupaca County template. Also my apologies to Iblardi and Buster7 if I did anything a or got caught into something. Also my apologies to you Royalbroil. Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 10:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
529532 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529530 +++$+++ 529530 +++$+++ 2008-06-05 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.212688560E09 +++$+++ RoyalBroil- I added the Town of Fremont to the Waupaca County template and added the template and reflist to the Town of Fremont article. User Nyttend or one of the bots will need to make any appropriate changes to the article to update any information. Thank you for your help and patient.  +++$+++ :RoyalBroil- I added the Town of Fremont to the Waupaca County template and added the template and reflist to the Town of Fremont article. User Nyttend or one of the bots will need to make any appropriate changes to the article to update any information. Thank you for your help and patient. [[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 10:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

267387 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-01 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.193965080E09 +++$+++ Further, I would appreciate an explanation of  how this whole issue was drawn to you attention so that you felt a block with NO WARNING AFTER I HAD DISENGAGED FROM THE ISSUE was justified?   +++$+++ Further, I would appreciate an explanation of  how this whole issue was drawn to you attention so that you felt a block with NO WARNING AFTER I HAD DISENGAGED FROM THE ISSUE was justified?  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
267388 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267387 +++$+++ 267387 +++$+++ 2007-11-01 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.193976660E09 +++$+++ Nothing in Wikipedia allows another editor to behave as you did toward Blueboar. Warnings are a means to prevent disruption, but are not mandatory (and are not a license to act contrary to the rules until you receive a full set), and any admin can impose a short block if they feel that it is appropriate. Whatever difficulties you have had with other editors actions with you does not excuse poor behaviour on your behalf, and if you are unable to recognise that you were extremely incivil toward Blueboar, questioning both his good faith efforts on your behalf, the language used and the accusations made, and that they did not constitute personal attacks then I fear that you are unlikely to learn anything from this incident. As mentioned, I was made aware of the matter when I read a post to ANI by Ninja Cyborg - whom I immediately blocked (again for 24 hours) for violating the warning I gave them, plus the subsequent discussions, for stalking you and advocating various actions - and I decided to review the situation.  +++$+++ :Nothing in Wikipedia allows another editor to behave as you did toward Blueboar. Warnings are a means to prevent disruption, but are not mandatory (and are not a license to act contrary to the rules until you receive a full set), and any admin can impose a short block if they feel that it is appropriate. Whatever difficulties you have had with other editors actions with you does not excuse poor behaviour on your behalf, and if you are unable to recognise that you were extremely incivil toward Blueboar, questioning both his good faith efforts on your behalf, the language used and the accusations made, and that they did not constitute personal attacks then I fear that you are unlikely to learn anything from this incident. As mentioned, I was made aware of the matter when I read a post to ANI by Ninja Cyborg - whom I immediately blocked (again for 24 hours) for violating the warning I gave them, plus the subsequent discussions, for stalking you and advocating various actions - and I decided to review the situation. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 21:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

529534 +++$+++ Buster7 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-05 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.212696240E09 +++$+++ I've looked high and low, but I can't find any article about an on-going Wisconsin event. If not in the town of Fremont article, where would I put information about a bi-annual event that draws thousands of fishermen into Wisconsin. (A human spawning run?) There must be someplace where the entries I made yesterday about white bass would seem less \"advertising\".-- +++$+++ I've looked high and low, but I can't find any article about an on-going Wisconsin event. If not in the town of Fremont article, where would I put information about a bi-annual event that draws thousands of fishermen into Wisconsin. (A human spawning run?) There must be someplace where the entries I made yesterday about white bass would seem less "advertising".--[[User:Buster7|Buster7]] ([[User talk:Buster7|talk]]) 13:04, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
529535 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529534 +++$+++ 529534 +++$+++ 2008-06-05 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.212699720E09 +++$+++ Check out the [[Iola, Wisconsin]] article to see how the well-known Iola Car Show is done in that article. Note that it is written in a neutral tone, short, and that it is backed up with a citation. It doesn't brag about the show or get into great detail. Content like \"It has been documented that there are times that 'a person could walk across the fast flowing river, stepping from boat to boat'\" and \"A favorite method among local fisherman is The Wolf River Rig\" make me cringe when they are placed in a city article. The first sentence is too far off-topic and the second sounds like an advertisement for the \"Wolf River Rig\" available at stores for just $10.99. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Check out the [[Iola, Wisconsin]] article to see how the well-known Iola Car Show is done in that article. Note that it is written in a neutral tone, short, and that it is backed up with a citation. It doesn't brag about the show or get into great detail. Content like "It has been documented that there are times that 'a person could walk across the fast flowing river, stepping from boat to boat'" and "A favorite method among local fisherman is The Wolf River Rig" make me cringe when they are placed in a city article. The first sentence is too far off-topic and the second sounds like an advertisement for the "Wolf River Rig" available at stores for just $10.99. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 14:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
529536 +++$+++ Buster7 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529534 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-06 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.212808560E09 +++$+++ I can tell your not a fisherman, Royal. \"Wolf River Rig\" is almost a generic term among fisherman in the Midwest to describe the manner in which the bait is presented to the fish. I'm sure if you ask around amongst your fellow Wisconsin editors, there will be some that remember how unbeleivably crowded many lakes and rivers become when the bass are running. To me its a slice of Wisconsin. Also, thanks for creating positive movement in that other situation. Its moving toward a win\/win solution.-- +++$+++ :::I can tell your not a fisherman, Royal. "Wolf River Rig" is almost a generic term among fisherman in the Midwest to describe the manner in which the bait is presented to the fish. I'm sure if you ask around amongst your fellow Wisconsin editors, there will be some that remember how unbeleivably crowded many lakes and rivers become when the bass are running. To me its a slice of Wisconsin. Also, thanks for creating positive movement in that other situation. Its moving toward a win/win solution.--[[User:Buster7|Buster7]] ([[User talk:Buster7|talk]]) 20:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
529537 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529534 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-06 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.212809640E09 +++$+++ Since \"Wolf River Rig\" is a general term and not a specific product, why don't you write a section in the Wolf River article about it? It's directly related to the river (since it's named after river, right?). That's the perfect place for the topic, except if it's big enough to carry its own article. You might want to redirect Wolf River Rig to the Wolf River article if not, since it sounds like a widespread term in the Midwest. Let me know if you need help. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::Since "Wolf River Rig" is a general term and not a specific product, why don't you write a section in the Wolf River article about it? It's directly related to the river (since it's named after river, right?). That's the perfect place for the topic, except if it's big enough to carry its own article. You might want to redirect Wolf River Rig to the Wolf River article if not, since it sounds like a widespread term in the Midwest. Let me know if you need help. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 20:34, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

5247 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-27 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.306501260E09 +++$+++ My internet connection is currently down due to storms. I will not be able to reply within the next few days at least until they can fix the %$@$# connection. *sigh*.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ My internet connection is currently down due to storms. I will not be able to reply within the next few days at least until they can fix the %$@$# connection. *sigh*.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 06:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
5248 +++$+++ SudoGhost +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5247 +++$+++ 5247 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.306501320E09 +++$+++ Then where did this post come from? ;)  Stay safe, these storms are pretty bad. -  +++$+++ :Then where did this post come from? ;)  Stay safe, these storms are pretty bad. - [[User:SudoGhost|<b style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#9932CD 0em 0em 0.4em,#800080 -0.2em -0.2em 0.4em,#000000 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;color:#e0e0e0">SudoGhost</b>]][[User_talk:SudoGhost|&trade;]] 06:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
5249 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5247 +++$+++ 5248 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.306501740E09 +++$+++ Internet cafe. :( I hate our ISP, but it's the only one servicing the area.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::Internet cafe. :( I hate our ISP, but it's the only one servicing the area.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 06:09, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

267393 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-02 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.193993340E09 +++$+++ You have mail babs :) +++$+++ You have mail babs :)[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 01:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
267394 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267393 +++$+++ 267393 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.193993400E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Very much appreciated as is your support in these unhappy times.   +++$+++ :Thanks! Very much appreciated as is your support in these unhappy times.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 01:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

529538 +++$+++ Vishnava +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-05 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.212733740E09 +++$+++ Hi RB - I have a question I was hoping you'd help me with. I've noticed cases of anonymous ips vandalizing a page then removing it themselves in the next edit. Should the article be reverted to before the ip edited, or its ok to just leave it alone and warn the ip? '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Hi RB - I have a question I was hoping you'd help me with. I've noticed cases of anonymous ips vandalizing a page then removing it themselves in the next edit. Should the article be reverted to before the ip edited, or its ok to just leave it alone and warn the ip? '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Vishnava|<font color="Red">Vishnava</font>]]<sub><small>[[User talk:Vishnava|<font color="Blue"> talk </font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 23:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
529539 +++$+++ Vishnava +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ 2008-06-06 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.212787800E09 +++$+++ Thanks - it does seem weird, like they're trying to get away with something or pull wool over our eyes. I worry sometimes of embedded vandalism that may escape the eye when they do this. '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Thanks - it does seem weird, like they're trying to get away with something or pull wool over our eyes. I worry sometimes of embedded vandalism that may escape the eye when they do this. '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Vishnava|<font color="Red">Vishnava</font>]]<sub><small>[[User talk:Vishnava|<font color="Blue"> talk </font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 14:30, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
529540 +++$+++ Vishnava +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ 529539 +++$+++ 2008-06-06 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.212790140E09 +++$+++ Hi again - (you're prolly getting a bit tired of my bugging you :) I request you to take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Kazi Nazrul Islam]]. A few editors have raised the view that Banglapedia is an inherently biased source; they also object to books published by the Nazrul Institute. Its a complicated argument that [[User:Armanaziz|Armanaziz]] and I have sought to counter, but its time to have more views or we'll keep going round in circles. '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Hi again - (you're prolly getting a bit tired of my bugging you :) I request you to take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Kazi Nazrul Islam]]. A few editors have raised the view that Banglapedia is an inherently biased source; they also object to books published by the Nazrul Institute. Its a complicated argument that [[User:Armanaziz|Armanaziz]] and I have sought to counter, but its time to have more views or we'll keep going round in circles. '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Vishnava|<font color="Red">Vishnava</font>]]<sub><small>[[User talk:Vishnava|<font color="Blue"> talk </font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 15:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
529541 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ 529540 +++$+++ 2008-06-06 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.212793800E09 +++$+++ I am not able to offer and opinion on Banglapedia, since I am not familiar with it. It's too bad, because I know most of the contributors involved in the discussion pretty well. I see there is a criticism section about it in Banglapedia's article. I haven't read Kazi Nazrul Islam's article, but I hope that you are concerned about the prose and POV issues that have been brought up by all of the reviewers. I don't have time to review the article at this time. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::I am not able to offer and opinion on Banglapedia, since I am not familiar with it. It's too bad, because I know most of the contributors involved in the discussion pretty well. I see there is a criticism section about it in Banglapedia's article. I haven't read Kazi Nazrul Islam's article, but I hope that you are concerned about the prose and POV issues that have been brought up by all of the reviewers. I don't have time to review the article at this time. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 16:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
529542 +++$+++ Vishnava +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ 529539 +++$+++ 2008-06-06 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.212800520E09 +++$+++ No problem - Yes actually we've addressed most, if not all of the prose and POV issues. The only bug is with these 2 subjects. Thanks anyway, '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::No problem - Yes actually we've addressed most, if not all of the prose and POV issues. The only bug is with these 2 subjects. Thanks anyway, '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Vishnava|<font color="Red">Vishnava</font>]]<sub><small>[[User talk:Vishnava|<font color="Blue"> talk </font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 18:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
529543 +++$+++ Vishnava +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ 2008-06-07 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.212827160E09 +++$+++ You've got mail. '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :You've got mail. '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Vishnava|<font color="Red">Vishnava</font>]]<sub><small>[[User talk:Vishnava|<font color="Blue"> talk </font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 01:26, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
529544 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ 529543 +++$+++ 2008-06-07 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.212839400E09 +++$+++ Where is this mail? I think I answered everything here that I could. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Where is this mail? I think I answered everything here that I could. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
529545 +++$+++ Vishnava +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ 529543 +++$+++ 2008-06-07 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.212880860E09 +++$+++ Well I've re-sent the email to the address you've provided here. '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Well I've re-sent the email to the address you've provided here. '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Vishnava|<font color="Red">Vishnava</font>]]<sub><small>[[User talk:Vishnava|<font color="Blue"> talk </font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 16:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
529546 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ 529545 +++$+++ 2008-06-07 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.212895680E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I didn't know that you meant email. It's good that you left a message because I don't check that account daily. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Sorry, I didn't know that you meant email. It's good that you left a message because I don't check that account daily. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 20:28, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
529547 +++$+++ Vishnava +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ 529543 +++$+++ 2008-06-07 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.212902580E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for your reply. One final thing - could you please semi-protect [[User:Vishnava]], [[User:Vishnava\/SpaceBar]] and [[User:Vishnava\/huggle.css]]. I want to take precautions against retaliation from ip vandals. '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks so much for your reply. One final thing - could you please semi-protect [[User:Vishnava]], [[User:Vishnava/SpaceBar]] and [[User:Vishnava/huggle.css]]. I want to take precautions against retaliation from ip vandals. '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Vishnava|<font color="Red">Vishnava</font>]]<sub><small>[[User talk:Vishnava|<font color="Blue"> talk </font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 22:23, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
529548 +++$+++ Vishnava +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529538 +++$+++ 529543 +++$+++ 2008-06-08 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.212982980E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Vishnava&curid=16844428&diff=217996406&oldid=217996039 My rite of passage :)]. I am officially one of the gang. '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Vishnava&curid=16844428&diff=217996406&oldid=217996039 My rite of passage :)]. I am officially one of the gang. '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Vishnava|<font color="Red">Vishnava</font>]]<sub><small>[[User talk:Vishnava|<font color="Blue"> talk </font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 20:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

5251 +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5251 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-04 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.307247780E09 +++$+++ Great work on all the images, thanks! Just wanted to remind you to tag the above image with {{tld|nolink=yes|unfree frame delete}}. This will ask the admins to remove the previous unfree image, without destroying the upload history. : ) \u2013&nbsp;<font color=\"#06266f\">Ker\u03b1u<\/font><font color=\"#1240AB\">no\u03c2co<\/font><font color=\"#4671DS\">pia<\/font><font color=\"#A60000\"><sup>\u25c1<\/sup><\/font><i><sub><font color=\"#5E1FFF\"> +++$+++ Great work on all the images, thanks! Just wanted to remind you to tag the above image with {{tld|nolink=yes|unfree frame delete}}. This will ask the admins to remove the previous unfree image, without destroying the upload history. : ) –&nbsp;<font color="#06266f">Kerαu</font><font color="#1240AB">noςco</font><font color="#4671DS">pia</font><font color="#A60000"><sup>◁</sup></font><i><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User:Keraunoscopia|gala]][[User talk:Keraunoscopia|xies]]</font></sub></i> 21:23, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
5252 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5251 +++$+++ 5251 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.307248080E09 +++$+++ Will do. Dunno much about commons templates so I usually just leave them to regulars there, heh. Will remember that for the future.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Will do. Dunno much about commons templates so I usually just leave them to regulars there, heh. Will remember that for the future.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 21:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
5253 +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5251 +++$+++ 5252 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.307249160E09 +++$+++ No worries, that's why I made it part of the instructions in the original request, since it's not expected that people would know about tagging the image. Anyways, it would probably never be done (I've only recently started tagging unfree frame images myself since no one else seemed to be doing it). Thanks for your help! \u2013&nbsp;<font color=\"#06266f\">Ker\u03b1u<\/font><font color=\"#1240AB\">no\u03c2co<\/font><font color=\"#4671DS\">pia<\/font><font color=\"#A60000\"><sup>\u25c1<\/sup><\/font><i><sub><font color=\"#5E1FFF\"> +++$+++ ::No worries, that's why I made it part of the instructions in the original request, since it's not expected that people would know about tagging the image. Anyways, it would probably never be done (I've only recently started tagging unfree frame images myself since no one else seemed to be doing it). Thanks for your help! –&nbsp;<font color="#06266f">Kerαu</font><font color="#1240AB">noςco</font><font color="#4671DS">pia</font><font color="#A60000"><sup>◁</sup></font><i><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User:Keraunoscopia|gala]][[User talk:Keraunoscopia|xies]]</font></sub></i> 21:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
5254 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5251 +++$+++ 5251 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.307345100E09 +++$+++ While speculations on his motivations are fine, they should be clearly labelled as such. The other ''factual'' information can be restored, but please try to use reliable sources and use more than one. The subject is deceased and a criminal, but the article is still a biography and great care should be taken on the statements made in them.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :While speculations on his motivations are fine, they should be clearly labelled as such. The other ''factual'' information can be restored, but please try to use reliable sources and use more than one. The subject is deceased and a criminal, but the article is still a biography and great care should be taken on the statements made in them.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 00:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

306710 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 306710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-17 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.150589400E09 +++$+++ I hope you'll be okay being labelled anti-trek, puppy-eater extraordinairre and all that comes with for agreeing with me ;) -- +++$+++ I hope you'll be okay being labelled anti-trek, puppy-eater extraordinairre and all that comes with for agreeing with me ;) --[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 17:10, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
306711 +++$+++ M1ss1ontomars2k4 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 306710 +++$+++ 306710 +++$+++ 2006-06-17 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.150611780E09 +++$+++ Oh, I'm not usually Anti-Trek--I usually end up taking care of Star Trek-related stuff for my school's quizbowl team. It's just that the list was just a bit too detailed to stay here. --[[User:M1ss1ontomars2k4|M1ss1ontom]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:M1ss1ontomars2k4\/Esperanza|a]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Oh, I'm not usually Anti-Trek--I usually end up taking care of Star Trek-related stuff for my school's quizbowl team. It's just that the list was just a bit too detailed to stay here. --[[User:M1ss1ontomars2k4|M1ss1ontom]]<font color="green">[[User:M1ss1ontomars2k4/Esperanza|a]]</font>[[User:M1ss1ontomars2k4|rs2k4]] <sup>([[User talk:M1ss1ontomars2k4|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/M1ss1ontomars2k4|C]] | [[Special:Emailuser/M1ss1ontomars2k4|@]])</sup> 23:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
306712 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 306710 +++$+++ 306711 +++$+++ 2006-06-17 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.150611900E09 +++$+++ I don't think you're anti-trek, but I've gotten nothing but flack for not agreeing that everything that bears or is related to trek is 100% gold ;) -- +++$+++ ::I don't think you're anti-trek, but I've gotten nothing but flack for not agreeing that everything that bears or is related to trek is 100% gold ;) --[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 23:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

5255 +++$+++ Jo3sampl +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5255 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-11 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.307854860E09 +++$+++ . . . for your recent answer referencing NPOV!  +++$+++ . . . for your recent answer referencing NPOV! [[User:Jo3sampl|Jo3sampl]] ([[User talk:Jo3sampl|talk]]) 22:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
5256 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5255 +++$+++ 5255 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.307903520E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) Hope that helped.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. :) Hope that helped.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 11:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

5257 +++$+++ John of Reading +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5257 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-17 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.308327180E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, now ''I've'' made a mess of ''your'' answer! I'll stay away from the page for a few minutes so you can clean up in peace. --  +++$+++ I'm sorry, now ''I've'' made a mess of ''your'' answer! I'll stay away from the page for a few minutes so you can clean up in peace. -- [[User:John of Reading|John of Reading]] ([[User talk:John of Reading|talk]]) 09:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
5258 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5257 +++$+++ 5257 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.308327600E09 +++$+++ LOL, no worries, I'm lagging big-time and when that happens, subsection edit buttons often get displaced. Appreciate the attempt at fixing though. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :LOL, no worries, I'm lagging big-time and when that happens, subsection edit buttons often get displaced. Appreciate the attempt at fixing though. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 09:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

5259 +++$+++ Mgiganteus1 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5259 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.308516840E09 +++$+++ Just a minor thing I've noticed, but shouldn't the arrows for [[lift (force)|lift]] in [[:File:Subaqueous flight.png|this image]] be pointing the opposite way?  +++$+++ Just a minor thing I've noticed, but shouldn't the arrows for [[lift (force)|lift]] in [[:File:Subaqueous flight.png|this image]] be pointing the opposite way? [[User:Mgiganteus1|mgiganteus1]] ([[User talk:Mgiganteus1|talk]]) 13:54, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
5260 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5259 +++$+++ 5259 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.308517260E09 +++$+++ Oop. Yep, I think so. Thanks for pointing it out. Will fix. I misinterpreted the source: http:\/\/www.geol.umd.edu\/~jmerck\/bsci392\/lecture10\/lecture10.html --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Oop. Yep, I think so. Thanks for pointing it out. Will fix. I misinterpreted the source: http://www.geol.umd.edu/~jmerck/bsci392/lecture10/lecture10.html --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 14:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
5261 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5259 +++$+++ 5260 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.308517860E09 +++$+++ Weird though, the source inverts the [[aerofoil]] on the upstroke, which would be impossible unless the animal's appendages somehow rotates 360 degrees. I'm going to interpret that as either a mistake on the author's part or a second example.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::Weird though, the source inverts the [[aerofoil]] on the upstroke, which would be impossible unless the animal's appendages somehow rotates 360 degrees. I'm going to interpret that as either a mistake on the author's part or a second example.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 14:11, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

267405 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267405 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-03 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.194082740E09 +++$+++ Glad you like them- you'll have to mail when you've looked a bit and let me know which sites\/parts you particularly enjoy.:) +++$+++ Glad you like them- you'll have to mail when you've looked a bit and let me know which sites/parts you particularly enjoy.:)[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 02:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
267406 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267405 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-03 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.194082980E09 +++$+++ Sorry I hadn't read your refraction policy you posted further up before I wrote that- v sensible and something quite a few people do:) +++$+++ ::Sorry I hadn't read your refraction policy you posted further up before I wrote that- v sensible and something quite a few people do:)[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 02:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

5263 +++$+++ Peter coxhead +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-24 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.308927660E09 +++$+++ Re your edit to [[Amoebozoa]]: I would be wary of using too much from Cavalier-Smith on classification. Note that he is in a very small minority (perhaps only of himself!) in rejecting the major division between Eubacteria and Archaea and in accepting openly paraphyletic taxa. At the least anything from him needs full referencing because it cannot be assumed to be a consensus of any kind. The introduction to [[Thomas Cavalier-Smith]] seems accurate in this respect. Of course, this doesn't mean that he's wrong.  +++$+++ Re your edit to [[Amoebozoa]]: I would be wary of using too much from Cavalier-Smith on classification. Note that he is in a very small minority (perhaps only of himself!) in rejecting the major division between Eubacteria and Archaea and in accepting openly paraphyletic taxa. At the least anything from him needs full referencing because it cannot be assumed to be a consensus of any kind. The introduction to [[Thomas Cavalier-Smith]] seems accurate in this respect. Of course, this doesn't mean that he's wrong. [[User:Peter coxhead|Peter coxhead]] ([[User talk:Peter coxhead|talk]]) 08:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
5264 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5263 +++$+++ 5263 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.308970200E09 +++$+++ Yep. Figured as much. The existence of taxa he created (they were listed in [[:Category:Missing taxobox]]), gave me the wrong impression that it was widely used in Amoebozoa articles. Only when I started digging deeper did I realize it was pretty much a big contradictory mess, heh. So I'm leaving it all up to people more involved in it, I guess. I was only cleaning up stubs and adding taxoboxes and whatnot per Stemonitis' suggestion in [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Palaeontology#Merging genus stubs into family articles]]. Feel free to revert. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Yep. Figured as much. The existence of taxa he created (they were listed in [[:Category:Missing taxobox]]), gave me the wrong impression that it was widely used in Amoebozoa articles. Only when I started digging deeper did I realize it was pretty much a big contradictory mess, heh. So I'm leaving it all up to people more involved in it, I guess. I was only cleaning up stubs and adding taxoboxes and whatnot per Stemonitis' suggestion in [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Palaeontology#Merging genus stubs into family articles]]. Feel free to revert. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 19:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
5265 +++$+++ Peter coxhead +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5263 +++$+++ 5264 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.308980640E09 +++$+++ I'm not touching it! Your description \"a big contradictory mess\" is absolutely right. There are more than enough muddles elsewhere (e.g. biological nomenclature articles) to keep me (un)happy.  +++$+++ ::I'm not touching it! Your description "a big contradictory mess" is absolutely right. There are more than enough muddles elsewhere (e.g. biological nomenclature articles) to keep me (un)happy. [[User:Peter coxhead|Peter coxhead]] ([[User talk:Peter coxhead|talk]]) 22:44, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
5266 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5263 +++$+++ 5265 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.308986340E09 +++$+++ Haha, well I guess we'll just wait until someone whacks us over the mess and imposes a system then. :P Seeing that I know next to nothing on amoebae, I'll be more liable to botch it up even further (already did, probably). Besides, I'm always leery of touching anything past the phylum rank. My offer of helping fix taxoboxes once people agree on a system to use still stands though. Though given that WikiProject Microbio is far too small a project for too vast a subject area, that might take a while. :(--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::Haha, well I guess we'll just wait until someone whacks us over the mess and imposes a system then. :P Seeing that I know next to nothing on amoebae, I'll be more liable to botch it up even further (already did, probably). Besides, I'm always leery of touching anything past the phylum rank. My offer of helping fix taxoboxes once people agree on a system to use still stands though. Though given that WikiProject Microbio is far too small a project for too vast a subject area, that might take a while. :(--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 00:19, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

267408 +++$+++ Iamunknown +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-04 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.194176460E09 +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, not sure why you haven't been notified yet, but there is a thread at AN\/I regarding you.  See [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#Review of Mattisse's Talk page]].  -- +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, not sure why you haven't been notified yet, but there is a thread at AN/I regarding you.  See [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Review of Mattisse's Talk page]].  --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 03:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
267409 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267408 +++$+++ 267408 +++$+++ 2007-11-04 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.194210360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know about AN\/I. In reading through it, the issues seem to be either non issues or  mostly old stuff already dealt with, some of it over and over (and some of it settled 1 1\/2 years ago), so there is no more for me to add. This Cyborg Ninja stuff has been going on for some weeks now, and responding in any way or asking for help with it just gets me into trouble. [[User:Lar]] very kindly helped me clean up my talk page after my recent block and so  I have moved on. Unless you think I should do something, I would rather just ignore it and get back to editing. Thanks for keeping me in touch with  what's going on.  -- +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know about AN/I. In reading through it, the issues seem to be either non issues or  mostly old stuff already dealt with, some of it over and over (and some of it settled 1 1/2 years ago), so there is no more for me to add. This Cyborg Ninja stuff has been going on for some weeks now, and responding in any way or asking for help with it just gets me into trouble. [[User:Lar]] very kindly helped me clean up my talk page after my recent block and so  I have moved on. Unless you think I should do something, I would rather just ignore it and get back to editing. Thanks for keeping me in touch with  what's going on.  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
267410 +++$+++ Iamunknown +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267408 +++$+++ 267409 +++$+++ 2007-11-05 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.194266460E09 +++$+++ By the way, seeing as how you edit quite a few case law articles, could you check out [[Wallace v. International Business Machines Corp. et al.]]?  I was working on it, and have reached an impasse -- I am not sure where relevant sources might be.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.  :)  Cheers,  +++$+++ ::By the way, seeing as how you edit quite a few case law articles, could you check out [[Wallace v. International Business Machines Corp. et al.]]?  I was working on it, and have reached an impasse -- I am not sure where relevant sources might be.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.  :)  Cheers, [[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 04:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
267411 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267408 +++$+++ 267410 +++$+++ 2007-11-05 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.194299520E09 +++$+++ Sure, I will try. I find these law cases extremely hard to figure out though, so I may have no more success than you!  +++$+++ :::Sure, I will try. I find these law cases extremely hard to figure out though, so I may have no more success than you! [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

175640 +++$+++ Drewcifer3000 +++$+++ Brandt Luke Zorn +++$+++ 175640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-07 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.252330860E09 +++$+++ I think I've addressed or commented on your notes for the GA review of The Slip.  So take a look!  +++$+++ I think I've addressed or commented on your notes for the GA review of The Slip.  So take a look! [[User:Drewcifer3000|Drewcifer]] ([[User talk:Drewcifer3000|talk]]) 06:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
175641 +++$+++ Drewcifer3000 +++$+++ Brandt Luke Zorn +++$+++ 175640 +++$+++ 175640 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.252377900E09 +++$+++ Take another look dude!  +++$+++ :Take another look dude! [[User:Drewcifer3000|Drewcifer]] ([[User talk:Drewcifer3000|talk]]) 19:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
175642 +++$+++ Drewcifer3000 +++$+++ Brandt Luke Zorn +++$+++ 175640 +++$+++ 175641 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.252381740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the GA review!  My eventual goal with the article is to bring it to FAC, so I've nominated it at peer review to get a few more opinions.  If there's anything else you had to say\/complain about the article, I'd appreciate it if you'd let me know [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/The Slip (album)\/archive1|here]].  Thanks again!  And next time you've got something up at GAN, feel free to ping me and hopefully I can save you the month-long wait for a review.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the GA review!  My eventual goal with the article is to bring it to FAC, so I've nominated it at peer review to get a few more opinions.  If there's anything else you had to say/complain about the article, I'd appreciate it if you'd let me know [[Wikipedia:Peer review/The Slip (album)/archive1|here]].  Thanks again!  And next time you've got something up at GAN, feel free to ping me and hopefully I can save you the month-long wait for a review. [[User:Drewcifer3000|Drewcifer]] ([[User talk:Drewcifer3000|talk]]) 20:49, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

5267 +++$+++ KFP +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-25 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.309055460E09 +++$+++ Hi there OS. If you have the time\/interest, any help in the help channel is appreciated. Every single helped newbie counts! -- +++$+++ Hi there OS. If you have the time/interest, any help in the help channel is appreciated. Every single helped newbie counts! --[[User:KFP|KFP]] <small>([[User talk:KFP|contact]] | [[Special:Contributions/KFP|edits]])</small> 19:31, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
5268 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5267 +++$+++ 5267 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.309058700E09 +++$+++ Heh, I know. I miss IRC desperately really but I'm avoiding it in the meantime (and any kind of stress really) due to very serious health problems. :( Once I can ascertain that it's not [[Cushing's syndrome|what I'm afraid of]], I'll be back assuredly. --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Heh, I know. I miss IRC desperately really but I'm avoiding it in the meantime (and any kind of stress really) due to very serious health problems. :( Once I can ascertain that it's not [[Cushing's syndrome|what I'm afraid of]], I'll be back assuredly. --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 20:25, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
5269 +++$+++ KFP +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5267 +++$+++ 5268 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.309059600E09 +++$+++ Oh, I didn't know. Take it easy and get well soon! -- +++$+++ ::Oh, I didn't know. Take it easy and get well soon! --[[User:KFP|KFP]] <small>([[User talk:KFP|contact]] | [[Special:Contributions/KFP|edits]])</small> 20:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
5270 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5267 +++$+++ 5269 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.309072260E09 +++$+++ Been nearly a year now, hence why I'm becoming desperate for a correct diagnosis and treatment. :[ Anyway, thanks.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::Been nearly a year now, hence why I'm becoming desperate for a correct diagnosis and treatment. :[ Anyway, thanks.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 00:11, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

267413 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.194423660E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. I have been requested ([[User_talk:Lar#Mattisse_and_mediation|at my talk page]]) to bring [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation\/Caisson (Asian architecture)]] to your attention, since you have been named as a party. I was told that you were told about it already but may have overlooked it or inavertantly deleted it en masse. Typically it is considered polite to respond to such requests, even if your response is that you do not wish to participate. Would you be so kind as to take the time to respond at the page? You can respond in the section [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation\/Caisson_%28Asian_architecture%29#Parties.27_agreement_to_mediate]]. I hope this has been helpful to you, happy editing.  (feel free to respond here if you want to discuss this with me, or at my talk page, as you like, but I may refactor to keep threads together)... ++ +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. I have been requested ([[User_talk:Lar#Mattisse_and_mediation|at my talk page]]) to bring [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Caisson (Asian architecture)]] to your attention, since you have been named as a party. I was told that you were told about it already but may have overlooked it or inavertantly deleted it en masse. Typically it is considered polite to respond to such requests, even if your response is that you do not wish to participate. Would you be so kind as to take the time to respond at the page? You can respond in the section [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Caisson_%28Asian_architecture%29#Parties.27_agreement_to_mediate]]. I hope this has been helpful to you, happy editing.  (feel free to respond here if you want to discuss this with me, or at my talk page, as you like, but I may refactor to keep threads together)... ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 00:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
267414 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267413 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-07 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.194437940E09 +++$+++ ''For the Mediation Committee,'' ''' +++$+++ ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 04:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

529558 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-09 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.213071120E09 +++$+++ Just trying to figure it out. Can't read Japanese. Question marks?  +++$+++ Just trying to figure it out. Can't read Japanese. Question marks? [[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#009500">  Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 21:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
529559 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529558 +++$+++ 529558 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.213071660E09 +++$+++ I don't have Japanese or Chinese language packs installed, so my computer rendered almost every letter as a question mark. You can use the mop to look at the old article. I saw thousands of question marks and a speedy deletion template, so I deleted it. As far as English goes, it's nonsense. Do whatever you think is right with the article. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I don't have Japanese or Chinese language packs installed, so my computer rendered almost every letter as a question mark. You can use the mop to look at the old article. I saw thousands of question marks and a speedy deletion template, so I deleted it. As far as English goes, it's nonsense. Do whatever you think is right with the article. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 21:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
529560 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529558 +++$+++ 529559 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.213071780E09 +++$+++ I think it's Chinese. Tagged for translation. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::I think it's Chinese. Tagged for translation. Cheers, [[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#009500">  Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 21:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
529561 +++$+++ Vishnava +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529558 +++$+++ 529559 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.213160820E09 +++$+++ No worries now - got it protected. '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::No worries now - got it protected. '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Vishnava|<font color="Blue">Vishnava</font>]]<sub><small>[[User talk:Vishnava|<font color="Red"> talk </font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 22:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

5271 +++$+++ Gildir +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-27 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.309230780E09 +++$+++ OS -- Thank you for your nomination of [[Maurice Fargues]] for [[Wikipedia:Did you know]].  I really appreciate it.  +++$+++ OS -- Thank you for your nomination of [[Maurice Fargues]] for [[Wikipedia:Did you know]].  I really appreciate it. [[User:Gildir|Gildir]] ([[User talk:Gildir|talk]]) 20:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
5272 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5271 +++$+++ 5271 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.309230960E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 20:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
5273 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5271 +++$+++ 5271 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.309315920E09 +++$+++ Apologies for that. You might want to clarify that it is not the same as the movie though. If it has another name in Urdu or something you can include that in parenthesis.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Apologies for that. You might want to clarify that it is not the same as the movie though. If it has another name in Urdu or something you can include that in parenthesis.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 19:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

267417 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-10 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.194748380E09 +++$+++ I have explained my changes on the talk page, so hope you won't hate me for them   lol.:)  Please don't give up on the article or your other articles if you encounter stuff like this, it's all a learning curve and don't be put off if there've been hasty tags etc as that's been decided in your favour by other eds very quickly really. +++$+++ I have explained my changes on the talk page, so hope you won't hate me for them   lol.:)  Please don't give up on the article or your other articles if you encounter stuff like this, it's all a learning curve and don't be put off if there've been hasty tags etc as that's been decided in your favour by other eds very quickly really.[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 18:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
267418 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267417 +++$+++ 267417 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.194748920E09 +++$+++ Not at all. I just did an article on the [[Hyde Amendment (1997)]] which got some of my need to write about Barry Cohen out of my system.   +++$+++ :Not at all. I just did an article on the [[Hyde Amendment (1997)]] which got some of my need to write about Barry Cohen out of my system.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
267419 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267417 +++$+++ 267418 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.194757920E09 +++$+++ Glad you like the BC article.  I imagine he's quite hard to make encyclopedic, because he\/his cases are often written about in a shock\/scandalous tone.:) P.S.  Have you looked at one or two of the links I sent you?  I don't think you have to sign in or owt just to read most of them. +++$+++ ::Glad you like the BC article.  I imagine he's quite hard to make encyclopedic, because he/his cases are often written about in a shock/scandalous tone.:) P.S.  Have you looked at one or two of the links I sent you?  I don't think you have to sign in or owt just to read most of them.[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 21:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
267420 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267417 +++$+++ 267419 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.194758940E09 +++$+++ I looked at them but they are confusing. I'm not an internet culture person so I will have to learn how by grazing around them a bit. In fact, I'm not sure what many of them are talking about. I know there are other wiki's also. I am getting very tired of this one and need to look around more. I just installed some sort of Wikipedia addon to my browser. Not quite sure what the advantages of it  are. Now my name button doesn't work. After a year of not knowing about it to begin with, now I've grown to depend on it!  +++$+++ :::I looked at them but they are confusing. I'm not an internet culture person so I will have to learn how by grazing around them a bit. In fact, I'm not sure what many of them are talking about. I know there are other wiki's also. I am getting very tired of this one and need to look around more. I just installed some sort of Wikipedia addon to my browser. Not quite sure what the advantages of it  are. Now my name button doesn't work. After a year of not knowing about it to begin with, now I've grown to depend on it! [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 21:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

5274 +++$+++ Lapatronne +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309307640E09 +++$+++ thank you for the advice  +++$+++ thank you for the advice [[User:Lapatronne|Lapatronne]] ([[User talk:Lapatronne|talk]]) 17:34, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
5275 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5274 +++$+++ 5274 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.309315920E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) Remember to fix it as soon as possible before it gets deleted. [[WP:BLP|Biographical articles]] have rather strict policies that have to be followed. If needed you can remove the information you can not reference for now, and leave only those that you can.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. :) Remember to fix it as soon as possible before it gets deleted. [[WP:BLP|Biographical articles]] have rather strict policies that have to be followed. If needed you can remove the information you can not reference for now, and leave only those that you can.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 19:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

5277 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5277 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-30 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309422840E09 +++$+++ Asian or not? See [[Talk:Elmelindo Rodrigues Smith#Asian American|talk page discussion]]. Since it has been shown that DEOMI isn't always reliable. -- +++$+++ Asian or not? See [[Talk:Elmelindo Rodrigues Smith#Asian American|talk page discussion]]. Since it has been shown that DEOMI isn't always reliable. --[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast|talk]]) 01:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
5278 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5277 +++$+++ 5277 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 09:25:00 +++$+++ 1.309451100E09 +++$+++ So yeah, unless someone lodges another complaint against DoD, we have no reason to change it. :P  --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :So yeah, unless someone lodges another complaint against DoD, we have no reason to change it. :P  --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 09:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

267422 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-11 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.194774120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 01:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
267423 +++$+++ Ac44ck +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267422 +++$+++ 267422 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.194775440E09 +++$+++ Thanks. -- +++$+++ :Thanks. --[[User:Ac44ck|Ac44ck]] 02:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

88261 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88261 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-01-16 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.074278400E09 +++$+++ Hi Shallot, thanks for your comments on my [[User talk:ChrisO|talk]] page on the [[Kosovo War]] article. I've posted some questions to [[Talk:Kosovo War]] about what the scope of the article should be, now that it's been written - it may be appropriate to present the political background on a separate page and confine the Kosovo War article to covering just the military conflict. I'd be grateful for your views. --  +++$+++ Hi Shallot, thanks for your comments on my [[User talk:ChrisO|talk]] page on the [[Kosovo War]] article. I've posted some questions to [[Talk:Kosovo War]] about what the scope of the article should be, now that it's been written - it may be appropriate to present the political background on a separate page and confine the Kosovo War article to covering just the military conflict. I'd be grateful for your views. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] 10:40, 16 Jan 2004 (UTC)
88262 +++$+++ Shallot +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88261 +++$+++ 88261 +++$+++ 2004-01-19 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.074549660E09 +++$+++ Use the search-in-page function of your browser :) It's under the letter O, as the original name is ''Oluja''. I put it there because all other operations are sorted that way. -- +++$+++ : Use the search-in-page function of your browser :) It's under the letter O, as the original name is ''Oluja''. I put it there because all other operations are sorted that way. --[[User:Shallot|Shallot]] 14:01, 19 Jan 2004 (UTC)

5280 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.309731300E09 +++$+++ Why is the help desk search able on google? Can you link me to some guideline please.  +++$+++ Why is the help desk search able on google? Can you link me to some guideline please. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 15:15, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
5281 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5280 +++$+++ 5280 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309731480E09 +++$+++ Because it's a Help Desk. It's supposed to be searchable by people looking for help.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Because it's a Help Desk. It's supposed to be searchable by people looking for help.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 15:18, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
5282 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5280 +++$+++ 5281 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.309731600E09 +++$+++ People don't need to be able to google the discussions, wikipedia help gives returns that are much more correct for such a limited purpose when the discussions are noindexed, please point me the the guideline - noticeboards in general are supposed to be noindexed. Are there some previous discussion you have been involved in regarding this where a precedent was set that you can link me to?   +++$+++ ::People don't need to be able to google the discussions, wikipedia help gives returns that are much more correct for such a limited purpose when the discussions are noindexed, please point me the the guideline - noticeboards in general are supposed to be noindexed. Are there some previous discussion you have been involved in regarding this where a precedent was set that you can link me to?  [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 15:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
5283 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5280 +++$+++ 5281 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.309732080E09 +++$+++ I will take that as a no then, it it just your personal opinion?  +++$+++ ::I will take that as a no then, it it just your personal opinion? [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 15:28, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
5284 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5280 +++$+++ 5283 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.309732500E09 +++$+++ Oh, and a tip: if you really want to hear somebody's reply, ''stop edit-conflicting them.''--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::Oh, and a tip: if you really want to hear somebody's reply, ''stop edit-conflicting them.''--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 15:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
5285 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5280 +++$+++ 5284 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.309732920E09 +++$+++ It is not a personal issue - all noticeboards are better noindexed - all sorts of stuff returns in search results that has no place in returning there. I care less about the comments about me from today but that is the trigger that brought me to check on the situation - I will continue with discussion on the talkpage, thanks for the link.  +++$+++ ::::It is not a personal issue - all noticeboards are better noindexed - all sorts of stuff returns in search results that has no place in returning there. I care less about the comments about me from today but that is the trigger that brought me to check on the situation - I will continue with discussion on the talkpage, thanks for the link. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 15:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
5286 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5280 +++$+++ 5285 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.309733460E09 +++$+++ I can't help but grit my teeth at that response. Haha. Get off that pedestal, mate. You != Consensus. Other than that, no comment.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::::I can't help but grit my teeth at that response. Haha. Get off that pedestal, mate. You != Consensus. Other than that, no comment.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 15:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
5287 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5280 +++$+++ 5286 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.309733880E09 +++$+++ Grit your teeth as much as you like - I am not your mate and I am not consensus and I am far from considering myself on any pedestal.  +++$+++ ::::::Grit your teeth as much as you like - I am not your mate and I am not consensus and I am far from considering myself on any pedestal. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 15:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
5288 +++$+++ FightingMac +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5280 +++$+++ 5280 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.309732620E09 +++$+++ Thanks Obsidian. I've looked at [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution]] and left a note on my Talk page agreeing to a RFC. But I see this not so much as content dispute as a user problem, as I suggest above. The essential element of the user concerned's quibble is that interlanguage links are uncommon. I've already given examples of where I use them and if anyone looking in can give other example that would be useful. Bear in mind the user is attacking a Wikipedia facility (interlanguage links) with an agreed policy about their use. It's not just about content. He saying they shouldn't be used. That, for example, I should crreate stubs in the English wikipedia. But the subjects involved aren't notable in English letters and their stubs would be deleted on those grounds.  +++$+++ *Thanks Obsidian. I've looked at [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution]] and left a note on my Talk page agreeing to a RFC. But I see this not so much as content dispute as a user problem, as I suggest above. The essential element of the user concerned's quibble is that interlanguage links are uncommon. I've already given examples of where I use them and if anyone looking in can give other example that would be useful. Bear in mind the user is attacking a Wikipedia facility (interlanguage links) with an agreed policy about their use. It's not just about content. He saying they shouldn't be used. That, for example, I should crreate stubs in the English wikipedia. But the subjects involved aren't notable in English letters and their stubs would be deleted on those grounds. [[User:FightingMac|FightingMac]] ([[User talk:FightingMac|talk]]) 15:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

568859 +++$+++ Hyde v +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568859 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.159159500E09 +++$+++ I am now considering this harrassment.   +++$+++ I am now considering this harrassment.  [[User:Hyde v|Hyde v]] 21:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
568860 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568859 +++$+++ 568859 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.159161420E09 +++$+++ To sum up; 1) debate the inclusion of information on the article's Talk page.  Quote relevent policy to justify its inclusion. 2) clarify your feelings of harrassment with Havok on his\/her Talk page.  Offer them an opportunity to explain in their own words. 3) If you still feel that you are being treated unreasonably, take your complaint to [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]], offering difs as evidence. Difs are to be found in the edit history of articles.  They will appear as the links to [[Classes in World of Warcraft]] do in the first paragraph of my response.  I am off to bed now, as it is close to midnight here in the UK, so I wish you best endevours for the remainder of today. Regards, <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :To sum up; 1) debate the inclusion of information on the article's Talk page.  Quote relevent policy to justify its inclusion. 2) clarify your feelings of harrassment with Havok on his/her Talk page.  Offer them an opportunity to explain in their own words. 3) If you still feel that you are being treated unreasonably, take your complaint to [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]], offering difs as evidence. Difs are to be found in the edit history of articles.  They will appear as the links to [[Classes in World of Warcraft]] do in the first paragraph of my response.  I am off to bed now, as it is close to midnight here in the UK, so I wish you best endevours for the remainder of today. Regards, <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''(aeropa'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''gitica)'''</font>]]</span> 22:17, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

267430 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-11 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.194817800E09 +++$+++ I have commented on [[Talk:Barry Cohen (attorney)]].  Sorry I didn't earlier, I just got up a couple of hours ago, I'm in the UK but tend not to do mornings.(unless you mean 4am lol):) +++$+++ I have commented on [[Talk:Barry Cohen (attorney)]].  Sorry I didn't earlier, I just got up a couple of hours ago, I'm in the UK but tend not to do mornings.(unless you mean 4am lol):)[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] 13:50, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
267431 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267430 +++$+++ 267430 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.194818040E09 +++$+++ I had to rewrite the article anyway, so as it turns out, there is nothing to fix. Someone else removed the tag, I believe. Thanks anyway!  -- +++$+++ :I had to rewrite the article anyway, so as it turns out, there is nothing to fix. Someone else removed the tag, I believe. Thanks anyway!  --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

263025 +++$+++ Una Smith +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263025 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-15 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.221477420E09 +++$+++ I will just say, again, that I thought the article had great DYK potential but we did not find a satisfactory hook.  I saw that Colin did not understand my objection to the one hook I objected to (out of four proposed), but rather than explore why he jumped on me.  When I proposed a hook, he jumped on me again.  I don't blame him, though;  as I said on the DYK page, I think the fundamental problem lies in the DYK process.  (I am sorry Colin took my saying so as a personal remark.)  I think Colin felt the clock was running and time was too short for discussion.  That's how I felt, and indeed time was too short.  I had to make an unpleasant choice between solidarity and quality.  I chose quality. -- +++$+++ I will just say, again, that I thought the article had great DYK potential but we did not find a satisfactory hook.  I saw that Colin did not understand my objection to the one hook I objected to (out of four proposed), but rather than explore why he jumped on me.  When I proposed a hook, he jumped on me again.  I don't blame him, though;  as I said on the DYK page, I think the fundamental problem lies in the DYK process.  (I am sorry Colin took my saying so as a personal remark.)  I think Colin felt the clock was running and time was too short for discussion.  That's how I felt, and indeed time was too short.  I had to make an unpleasant choice between solidarity and quality.  I chose quality. --[[User:Una Smith|Una Smith]] ([[User talk:Una Smith|talk]]) 04:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
263026 +++$+++ GDallimore +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263025 +++$+++ 263025 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 08:02:00 +++$+++ 1.222268520E09 +++$+++ In view of the above, I offer you this: [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Possible_new_nomination_process]].  +++$+++ :In view of the above, I offer you this: [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Possible_new_nomination_process]]. [[User:GDallimore|GDallimore]] ([[User talk:GDallimore|Talk]]) 08:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

267432 +++$+++ Fuhghettaboutit +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267432 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-11 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.194831000E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure why the template is not working but one thing that is incorrect is that you are using four tildes instead of five, and thus the template is getting your signature, rather than just the time stamp.-- +++$+++ I'm not sure why the template is not working but one thing that is incorrect is that you are using four tildes instead of five, and thus the template is getting your signature, rather than just the time stamp.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] 17:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
267433 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267432 +++$+++ 267432 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.194831180E09 +++$+++ I just noticed you fixed it and it seems to be working now. So THANKS! I have been on wikipedia over a year and one half and still cannot figure out instructions! Very frustrated with myself. Thank you so much. -- +++$+++ :I just noticed you fixed it and it seems to be working now. So THANKS! I have been on wikipedia over a year and one half and still cannot figure out instructions! Very frustrated with myself. Thank you so much. --[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
267434 +++$+++ Fuhghettaboutit +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267432 +++$+++ 267433 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.194831300E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. By the way, did you notice the extensive section I posted this morning on the talk page? I was hoping the user would read that, would understand the policies involved better, and that that would help defuse the situation.-- +++$+++ ::You're welcome. By the way, did you notice the extensive section I posted this morning on the talk page? I was hoping the user would read that, would understand the policies involved better, and that that would help defuse the situation.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] 17:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
267435 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267432 +++$+++ 267434 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.194831960E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much for explaining so clearly to the editor on his user page. I don't know if you noticed but I did explain also (not as well as you did) and gave examples of articles and policies but he put comments throughout my post, saying I was basically wrong.  Hopefully, he will see you as more credible than he does me.  Thanks!   +++$+++ :::Thank you so much for explaining so clearly to the editor on his user page. I don't know if you noticed but I did explain also (not as well as you did) and gave examples of articles and policies but he put comments throughout my post, saying I was basically wrong.  Hopefully, he will see you as more credible than he does me.  Thanks!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

5289 +++$+++ FightingMac +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.309744200E09 +++$+++ Thank you  +++$+++ Thank you [[User:FightingMac|FightingMac]] ([[User talk:FightingMac|talk]]) 18:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
5290 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5289 +++$+++ 5289 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.309745100E09 +++$+++ I do not want to be involved in this any longer. I regret even attempting to mediate. I have an appointment with a neurologist tomorrow for something rather serious and I'd rather forget about this and him. Apologies.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :I do not want to be involved in this any longer. I regret even attempting to mediate. I have an appointment with a neurologist tomorrow for something rather serious and I'd rather forget about this and him. Apologies.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 19:05, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
5291 +++$+++ FightingMac +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5289 +++$+++ 5290 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.309751760E09 +++$+++ I hope all goes well with you tomorrow. Thanks for your time.  +++$+++ ::I hope all goes well with you tomorrow. Thanks for your time. [[User:FightingMac|FightingMac]] ([[User talk:FightingMac|talk]]) 20:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
5292 +++$+++ FightingMac +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5289 +++$+++ 5291 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.309843380E09 +++$+++ You might like to know I applied for a [[Wikipedia:Third opinion | Third opinion]] and got one favourable to me. I really hope all went well with you yesterday. I had a crisis myself involving a urologist a couple of years ago which I got through (minus a bladder well past its sell by date as it happened but the new arrangements are a decided improvement on the sorry sate of affairs the old arrangements had come to) and one does somehow struggle through. I hope and trust it shall be the same with you. Thank you again for your efforts. I'm sorry that my adversary proved to be quite so singularly unpleasant. I should perhaps not have been quite so confrontational with him and I do aplogise it rubbed off on you.   +++$+++ :::You might like to know I applied for a [[Wikipedia:Third opinion | Third opinion]] and got one favourable to me. I really hope all went well with you yesterday. I had a crisis myself involving a urologist a couple of years ago which I got through (minus a bladder well past its sell by date as it happened but the new arrangements are a decided improvement on the sorry sate of affairs the old arrangements had come to) and one does somehow struggle through. I hope and trust it shall be the same with you. Thank you again for your efforts. I'm sorry that my adversary proved to be quite so singularly unpleasant. I should perhaps not have been quite so confrontational with him and I do aplogise it rubbed off on you.  [[User:FightingMac|FightingMac]] ([[User talk:FightingMac|talk]]) 22:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
5293 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5289 +++$+++ 5292 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.309843920E09 +++$+++ As for the help desk issue, no worries and no comment, LOL. I really want to stay out of that one, if only because I'm certainly ''not'' an uninvolved editor by now, heh. Anyway cheers :) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::::As for the help desk issue, no worries and no comment, LOL. I really want to stay out of that one, if only because I'm certainly ''not'' an uninvolved editor by now, heh. Anyway cheers :) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 22:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
5294 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5289 +++$+++ 5289 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.309927200E09 +++$+++ You're welcome, though to be fair, all I did was remove an already complied with maintenance tag. :) Cheers, and don't be afraid to ask for help when you run into problems.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome, though to be fair, all I did was remove an already complied with maintenance tag. :) Cheers, and don't be afraid to ask for help when you run into problems.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 21:40, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
5295 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5289 +++$+++ 5289 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.309927620E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi<span style="color:#ffc046">♠</span>n]]<sup>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#ffc046">Soul</span>]]</sup></span>''' 21:47, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

88263 +++$+++ Morwen +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-02-07 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.076190780E09 +++$+++ That's interesting - that means my souce map is flat out wrong.  It does show the western part, but not the southern part - Zagreb county being shown as two detatched areas.  I will rectify all my maps.   +++$+++ That's interesting - that means my souce map is flat out wrong.  It does show the western part, but not the southern part - Zagreb county being shown as two detatched areas.  I will rectify all my maps.  [[User:Morwen|Morwen]] 13:53, Feb 7, 2004 (UTC)
88264 +++$+++ Shallot +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88263 +++$+++ 88263 +++$+++ 2004-02-07 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.076190960E09 +++$+++ I was quite pleasantly surprised that you had the maps at all -- this was a just a minor glitch for me to fix :) I believe that your map may be reflecting an outdated situation, because I seem to remember some border changes as well. I fixed the two pertinent maps myself, thanks for doing it on the others and thanks for doing that at all, it's just what the county pages needed! -- +++$+++ : I was quite pleasantly surprised that you had the maps at all -- this was a just a minor glitch for me to fix :) I believe that your map may be reflecting an outdated situation, because I seem to remember some border changes as well. I fixed the two pertinent maps myself, thanks for doing it on the others and thanks for doing that at all, it's just what the county pages needed! --[[User:Shallot|Shallot]] 13:56, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)
88265 +++$+++ Morwen +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88263 +++$+++ 88264 +++$+++ 2004-02-07 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.076191380E09 +++$+++ Happy to help.  My next concern is going to be patching all the other 19 maps ;) Will do this an re-upload.  I'll put them all somewhere so you can upload them at your leisure for new counties articles.    +++$+++ ::Happy to help.  My next concern is going to be patching all the other 19 maps ;) Will do this an re-upload.  I'll put them all somewhere so you can upload them at your leisure for new counties articles.   [[User:Morwen|Morwen]] 14:03, Feb 7, 2004 (UTC)

267438 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-15 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.195162860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] 13:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
267439 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267438 +++$+++ 267438 +++$+++ 2007-11-15 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.195163580E09 +++$+++ I have just looked at my email and your email is there. Some of it is formated using characters that gmail does not recognize. I will do cut\/paste and  see if Wikipedia does. I can probably do as you request when I am able to read it -- although, as I have said, I do not quite understand some of what you are writing about, but I certainly recognize and admire your efforts.  Sincerely,   +++$+++ :I have just looked at my email and your email is there. Some of it is formated using characters that gmail does not recognize. I will do cut/paste and  see if Wikipedia does. I can probably do as you request when I am able to read it -- although, as I have said, I do not quite understand some of what you are writing about, but I certainly recognize and admire your efforts.  Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

568861 +++$+++ Hyde v +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568861 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.159162440E09 +++$+++ If posting to a talk page is not the proper thing to do, then please delete these comments.  However, as I stated previously, I am not discussing content or edits.  I'm annoyed at the fact that a poster with no moderator or administrator status can admonish me for what they believe is invalid content.  If an user wants to make edits, fine, let them.  But they should not be allowed to inform other users that what they wrote is not allowed.  It is not another user's position to admonish those who came before him.  At my job, I do not answer or justify my actions to another employee.  I answer to my boss.  In this situation, Havoc and I are on equal standings.  I do not feel it is my place to police him and then slap him down if he does wrong.  Nor do I believe that is his place either.  If it is Wikipedia policy that someone who is not an admin or moderator can act like a parent to me, then perhaps I need to leave Wikipedia.  Delete these comments if you want.  You are, after all, an admin that I will submit authority to.   +++$+++ If posting to a talk page is not the proper thing to do, then please delete these comments.  However, as I stated previously, I am not discussing content or edits.  I'm annoyed at the fact that a poster with no moderator or administrator status can admonish me for what they believe is invalid content.  If an user wants to make edits, fine, let them.  But they should not be allowed to inform other users that what they wrote is not allowed.  It is not another user's position to admonish those who came before him.  At my job, I do not answer or justify my actions to another employee.  I answer to my boss.  In this situation, Havoc and I are on equal standings.  I do not feel it is my place to police him and then slap him down if he does wrong.  Nor do I believe that is his place either.  If it is Wikipedia policy that someone who is not an admin or moderator can act like a parent to me, then perhaps I need to leave Wikipedia.  Delete these comments if you want.  You are, after all, an admin that I will submit authority to.  [[User:Hyde v|Hyde v]] 22:34, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
568862 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568861 +++$+++ 568861 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.159164060E09 +++$+++ I see a difference of interpretation here.  Use of phrases such as ''\"...they should not be...I do not feel...Nor do I believe...\"'' demonstrate an emotional response.  This is quite understandable, as no one likes to be warned about editing in good faith.  The quotation below demonstrates that all users are effectively equal.  We all edit in order to improve Wikipedia.  Some edit to harm the encyclopedia and others watch for this and prevent their efforts from succeeding.  This is one method of growing admins, reverting vandal edits and warning the vandals.  Honest editors can sometimes be caught in the crossfire as a false-positive.  This is unfortunate.  Wikipedia doesn't operate under a Manager-employee heirarchical system.  Admins have reserved powers of deletion because it would be terribly destructive to give these to vandals. They are given these powers when they have demonstrated that they edit and cleanup vandalism according to policy, as it is policy that takes the role of the Manager, rather than one or a collective of individuals. If you feel that you are being parented then we all are from time-to-time, as those that understand a policy inform us of our actions in order to make us better editors.  As you continue to contribute in the future, you will find that you will be able to inform other people of places where they can improve their contributions.  I would request that you don't leave the project because of this exchange as your contributions really can help the encyclopedia to grow. I really must go now, goodnight! <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :I see a difference of interpretation here.  Use of phrases such as ''"...they should not be...I do not feel...Nor do I believe..."'' demonstrate an emotional response.  This is quite understandable, as no one likes to be warned about editing in good faith.  The quotation below demonstrates that all users are effectively equal.  We all edit in order to improve Wikipedia.  Some edit to harm the encyclopedia and others watch for this and prevent their efforts from succeeding.  This is one method of growing admins, reverting vandal edits and warning the vandals.  Honest editors can sometimes be caught in the crossfire as a false-positive.  This is unfortunate.  Wikipedia doesn't operate under a Manager-employee heirarchical system.  Admins have reserved powers of deletion because it would be terribly destructive to give these to vandals. They are given these powers when they have demonstrated that they edit and cleanup vandalism according to policy, as it is policy that takes the role of the Manager, rather than one or a collective of individuals. If you feel that you are being parented then we all are from time-to-time, as those that understand a policy inform us of our actions in order to make us better editors.  As you continue to contribute in the future, you will find that you will be able to inform other people of places where they can improve their contributions.  I would request that you don't leave the project because of this exchange as your contributions really can help the encyclopedia to grow. I really must go now, goodnight! <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''(aeropa'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''gitica)'''</font>]]</span> 23:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

267440 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267440 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-15 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.195164120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] 14:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
267441 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267440 +++$+++ 267440 +++$+++ 2007-11-15 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.195164240E09 +++$+++ O.K. Do that. I will try to do it quickly.   +++$+++ :O.K. Do that. I will try to do it quickly.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

5297 +++$+++ Lukep913 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310005740E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Thank you for helping me for my signature.  ''' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for helping me for my signature.  '''[[User:Lukep913|<ins><span style="color:blue">Lukep913</span></ins>]]''' 19:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
5298 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5297 +++$+++ 5297 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.310005920E09 +++$+++ Haha... I feel special. XD You're welcome.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Haha... I feel special. XD You're welcome.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi♠n</span>]] [[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 19:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

529586 +++$+++ Accounting4Taste +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529586 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-17 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.213689180E09 +++$+++ I was actually about to delete this article when you removed the speedy tag.  I did read one of the VH1 articles that were referenced at the end of the article, and found this direct quote: \"While he hadn't yet attained widespread popularity...\" -- which seemed to me to be a classic definition of someone who didn't meet the notability guidelines.  However, I thought I'd offer you the opportunity to perhaps fill in this article further, or give me the benefit of your thinking, if you cared to do that.  I'll hold off until you reply, and thanks for your time in considering this.   +++$+++ I was actually about to delete this article when you removed the speedy tag.  I did read one of the VH1 articles that were referenced at the end of the article, and found this direct quote: "While he hadn't yet attained widespread popularity..." -- which seemed to me to be a classic definition of someone who didn't meet the notability guidelines.  However, I thought I'd offer you the opportunity to perhaps fill in this article further, or give me the benefit of your thinking, if you cared to do that.  I'll hold off until you reply, and thanks for your time in considering this.  [[User:Accounting4Taste|Accounting4Taste]]:<small>[[User talk:Accounting4Taste|talk]]</small> 00:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
529587 +++$+++ Accounting4Taste +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529586 +++$+++ 529586 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.213689660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comment; I'm going to consider this further before\/if I proceed.  In the meantime, I certainly won't speedy it under any circumstances, given your objection.  I may (very possibly, in fact) do nothing further; I have to go offline now.  If there's anything further you wish to add, I'm at your service.   +++$+++ :Thanks for your comment; I'm going to consider this further before/if I proceed.  In the meantime, I certainly won't speedy it under any circumstances, given your objection.  I may (very possibly, in fact) do nothing further; I have to go offline now.  If there's anything further you wish to add, I'm at your service.  [[User:Accounting4Taste|Accounting4Taste]]:<small>[[User talk:Accounting4Taste|talk]]</small> 01:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

5300 +++$+++  Sharktopus +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5300 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-07 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310102160E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Thanks for lending your mighty powers to helping make this new article as good as it could be.  <font style=\"font-family:sans-serif;color:black;\"> <span style=\"text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml\">  ''''' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for lending your mighty powers to helping make this new article as good as it could be.  <font style="font-family:sans-serif;color:black;"> <span style="text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml">  '''''[[User:Sharktopus|Sharktopus]]'''''</span> [[user talk: Sharktopus|<sup>talk</sup></font>]] 22:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
5301 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5300 +++$+++ 5300 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310433480E09 +++$+++ Thanks. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Thanks. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi♠n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 18:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

529590 +++$+++ Gail +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-18 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.213829520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the helpful suggestions :) In fact I was thinking of setting up my user page with some userboxes soon, and the {{tl|Rollback}} template would be a nice addition. I'm surprised that my page still appears as a red link though, because I had set it to redirect to my talk page earlier today. Maybe it's because of some caches.  +++$+++ Thanks for the helpful suggestions :) In fact I was thinking of setting up my user page with some userboxes soon, and the {{tl|Rollback}} template would be a nice addition. I'm surprised that my page still appears as a red link though, because I had set it to redirect to my talk page earlier today. Maybe it's because of some caches. [[User:Gail|Gail]] ([[User talk:Gail|talk]]) 15:52, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
529591 +++$+++ Gail +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529590 +++$+++ 529590 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.213832580E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks again for the advice!  +++$+++ :Ok, thanks again for the advice! [[User:Gail|Gail]] ([[User talk:Gail|talk]]) 16:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

5303 +++$+++ Volunteer Marek +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310563080E09 +++$+++ Maybe it's better to move some of the discussion off the RSN board. Anyway, I don't think your analogy with not having read a book is an appropriate one. The situation would be more similar to someone just reading a chapter's heading within the book rather than the chapter itself. Books are written differently than papers. A book can contain self-contained chapters. I would certainly expect someone to read the relevant chapter that they're citing from, though not necessarily the whole book. Though again, in the interest of accessibility I'd say it's fine to cite non-controversial, non-contentious claims after only having read a portion of a chapter. But as soon as someone asks about it, folks need to go out and do the actual reading. +++$+++ Maybe it's better to move some of the discussion off the RSN board. Anyway, I don't think your analogy with not having read a book is an appropriate one. The situation would be more similar to someone just reading a chapter's heading within the book rather than the chapter itself. Books are written differently than papers. A book can contain self-contained chapters. I would certainly expect someone to read the relevant chapter that they're citing from, though not necessarily the whole book. Though again, in the interest of accessibility I'd say it's fine to cite non-controversial, non-contentious claims after only having read a portion of a chapter. But as soon as someone asks about it, folks need to go out and do the actual reading.[[User:Volunteer Marek|Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 06:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
5304 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5303 +++$+++ 5303 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.310565060E09 +++$+++ And yeah, discussion's getting a bit heated. I think it's time to stay off it.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :And yeah, discussion's getting a bit heated. I think it's time to stay off it.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi♠n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 06:51, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
5305 +++$+++ Volunteer Marek +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5303 +++$+++ 5304 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310658960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. It seems to me that we don't actually disagree all that much. +++$+++ ::Thanks. It seems to me that we don't actually disagree all that much.[[User:Volunteer Marek|Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 08:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

267449 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267449 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-11 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.194796440E09 +++$+++ This FA thing is really frustrating a strange way. Earlier on WP I had to source text and keep WP policies in mind and that was it! I guess I'm still getting used to threadbare discussions like this one. I guess I have been looking rather uncompromising out there so thanks for the pointers. <br> +++$+++ This FA thing is really frustrating a strange way. Earlier on WP I had to source text and keep WP policies in mind and that was it! I guess I'm still getting used to threadbare discussions like this one. I guess I have been looking rather uncompromising out there so thanks for the pointers. <br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">Havelock the Dane</font>]]<sup> [[User talk:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">Talk</font>]]</sup> 07:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
267450 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267449 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.194842940E09 +++$+++ Everyone has something to add to the article ! This looks more and more like those Zen puzzles which frustrate people (Thanks for showing me the path btw, zen master !). I remember my oath to walk the [[Silk Route]] (edit it\/fully source it in Wiki terms) as well.<br>Seriously, [[Jim Corbett National Park]], after a WP:GA stamp, would have been a better first FA nom choice for me.<br> +++$+++ ::Everyone has something to add to the article ! This looks more and more like those Zen puzzles which frustrate people (Thanks for showing me the path btw, zen master !). I remember my oath to walk the [[Silk Route]] (edit it/fully source it in Wiki terms) as well.<br>Seriously, [[Jim Corbett National Park]], after a WP:GA stamp, would have been a better first FA nom choice for me.<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">Havelock the Dane</font>]]<sup> [[User talk:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">Talk</font>]]</sup> 20:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
267451 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267449 +++$+++ 267449 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.194884640E09 +++$+++ The MoS looks \"very\" complicated on reading [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/Bob_Meusel this], with things like \"''Very'' is usually ''very'' redundant !\" <br>I realize that as long as people ask productive expansions (or simply expansions) to be made to the article the situation is way better than no one responding at all. Even the wait for Jim Corbett national Park GA review has been driving me crazy for a while now. A wait here would have to be bigger and more frustrating.<br> +++$+++ :The MoS looks "very" complicated on reading [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Bob_Meusel this], with things like "''Very'' is usually ''very'' redundant !" <br>I realize that as long as people ask productive expansions (or simply expansions) to be made to the article the situation is way better than no one responding at all. Even the wait for Jim Corbett national Park GA review has been driving me crazy for a while now. A wait here would have to be bigger and more frustrating.<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">Havelock the Dane</font>]]<sup> [[User talk:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">Talk</font>]]</sup> 08:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
267452 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267449 +++$+++ 267451 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.195308300E09 +++$+++ Thankfully, I remember reading about the environmental_issues\/trade_routes subject, especially the oil slicks in maritime routes and such, and should hopefully be able to integrate it as soon as my PC stops acting up.<br>Thank you for staying with the FA nom, I would have probably given up if you were not here to guide me through this.<br> +++$+++ ::Thankfully, I remember reading about the environmental_issues/trade_routes subject, especially the oil slicks in maritime routes and such, and should hopefully be able to integrate it as soon as my PC stops acting up.<br>Thank you for staying with the FA nom, I would have probably given up if you were not here to guide me through this.<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">Havelock the Dane</font>]]<sup> [[User talk:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">Talk</font>]]</sup> 06:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

5306 +++$+++ Adamdaley +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5306 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.310565960E09 +++$+++ Thanks [[User:Obsidian Soul]], I went through Manila to Cebu with no problems, but on the way back I caused problems but got the special treatment and pushed upto the front of the line at the Airport. Told a security to go shove it! Other than that, I enjoyed my time and want to go back but not through Manila!  +++$+++ Thanks [[User:Obsidian Soul]], I went through Manila to Cebu with no problems, but on the way back I caused problems but got the special treatment and pushed upto the front of the line at the Airport. Told a security to go shove it! Other than that, I enjoyed my time and want to go back but not through Manila! [[User:Adamdaley|Adamdaley]] ([[User talk:Adamdaley|talk]]) 07:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
5307 +++$+++ Adamdaley +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5306 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.310586600E09 +++$+++ [[User:Obsidian Soul]], no not that. I had a suitcase, a backpack, sportsbag and another bag and there was no way for my girl to get inside without a ticket. So she was allowed as far as \"Information Desk\" inside the main entrance.  +++$+++ ::[[User:Obsidian Soul]], no not that. I had a suitcase, a backpack, sportsbag and another bag and there was no way for my girl to get inside without a ticket. So she was allowed as far as "Information Desk" inside the main entrance. [[User:Adamdaley|Adamdaley]] ([[User talk:Adamdaley|talk]]) 12:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

568863 +++$+++ Saadsaleem +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-25 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.159192560E09 +++$+++ Can you please delete my account [[User:Saadsaleem]] and purge the talk and main page. I'll be grateful. Cheers!  +++$+++ Can you please delete my account [[User:Saadsaleem]] and purge the talk and main page. I'll be grateful. Cheers! [[User:Saadsaleem|SaadSaleem]] 06:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
568864 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568863 +++$+++ 568863 +++$+++ 2006-09-25 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.159220820E09 +++$+++ I cannot delete your user account.  Please see [[Wikipedia:Account_deletion#Deleting_your_user_account|Deleting your user account]] for details of how to go about this process. <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :I cannot delete your user account.  Please see [[Wikipedia:Account_deletion#Deleting_your_user_account|Deleting your user account]] for details of how to go about this process. <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''(aeropa'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''gitica)'''</font>]]</span> 14:47, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

5308 +++$+++ Since 10.28.2010 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.310729580E09 +++$+++ Your comment [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AHelp_desk&action=historysubmit&diff=439543109&oldid=439541542 here] ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AHelp_desk&action=historysubmit&diff=439543109&oldid=439541542#I_would_like_to_.22like.22_comments_:-.29 shortcut]): Just a question, exactly what does \u201cspoil the kitten-eating monsters\u201d mean? Thanks,  +++$+++ Your comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AHelp_desk&action=historysubmit&diff=439543109&oldid=439541542 here] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AHelp_desk&action=historysubmit&diff=439543109&oldid=439541542#I_would_like_to_.22like.22_comments_:-.29 shortcut]): Just a question, exactly what does “spoil the kitten-eating monsters” mean? Thanks, [[User:Since 10.28.2010| A person who has been editing Wikipedia since October 28, 2010.]] ([[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|talk]]) 04:33, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
5309 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5308 +++$+++ 5308 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.310753460E09 +++$+++ It means spoiling the monster who eats them kittunz. :3 --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :It means spoiling the monster who eats them kittunz. :3 --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi♠n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 11:11, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
5310 +++$+++ Since 10.28.2010 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5308 +++$+++ 5309 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.310795580E09 +++$+++ What monster? As far as I'm concerned, they don't exist. Is the phrase like, a metaphor for something, or what? And what the *** is \u201c:3\u201d?  +++$+++ ::What monster? As far as I'm concerned, they don't exist. Is the phrase like, a metaphor for something, or what? And what the *** is “:3”? [[User:Since 10.28.2010| A person who has been editing Wikipedia since October 28, 2010.]] ([[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|talk]]) 22:53, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
5311 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5308 +++$+++ 5310 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310804820E09 +++$+++ They don't exist? No, really? {{=)|surprise}} --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::They don't exist? No, really? {{=)|surprise}} --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi♠n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 01:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
5312 +++$+++  +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5308 +++$+++ 5311 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.310804880E09 +++$+++ <del>Excuse me?<\/del> Holy ***? Are you trying to tell me that I'm stupid? You need to stop your crude humor, and please tell me what it is. <big>'''''[[A]] [[person]] [[Who (pronoun)|who]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|has been]] [[Help:Editing|editing]] [[Wikipedia]]  +++$+++ ::::<del>Excuse me?</del> Holy ***? Are you trying to tell me that I'm stupid? You need to stop your crude humor, and please tell me what it is. <big>'''''[[A]] [[person]] [[Who (pronoun)|who]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|has been]] [[Help:Editing|editing]] [[Wikipedia]] [[User:Since 10.28.2010|since]] [[Thursday]][[Comma|,]] [[October]] [[October 28|28]], [[2010]][[Full stop|.]]'''''</big> 01:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
5313 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5308 +++$+++ 5312 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.310805000E09 +++$+++ You're excused. --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::::You're excused. --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi♠n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 01:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
5314 +++$+++  +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5308 +++$+++ 5313 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.310805060E09 +++$+++ '''Please tell me what it is.''' <big>'''''[[A]] [[person]] [[Who (pronoun)|who]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|has been]] [[Help:Editing|editing]] [[Wikipedia]]  +++$+++ ::::::'''Please tell me what it is.''' <big>'''''[[A]] [[person]] [[Who (pronoun)|who]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|has been]] [[Help:Editing|editing]] [[Wikipedia]] [[User:Since 10.28.2010|since]] [[Thursday]][[Comma|,]] [[October]] [[October 28|28]], [[2010]][[Full stop|.]]'''''</big> 01:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
5315 +++$+++  +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5308 +++$+++ 5313 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310812020E09 +++$+++ Please tell me what it is. '''''[[A]] [[person]] [[Who (pronoun)|who]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|has been]] [[Help:Editing|editing]] [[Wikipedia]]  +++$+++ ::::::Please tell me what it is. '''''[[A]] [[person]] [[Who (pronoun)|who]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|has been]] [[Help:Editing|editing]] [[Wikipedia]] [[User:Since 10.28.2010|since]] [[Thursday]][[Comma|,]] [[October]] [[October 28|28]], [[2010]][[Full stop|.]]''''' 03:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
5316 +++$+++  +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5308 +++$+++ 5313 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.310812680E09 +++$+++ Can you be so kind to just read [[Wikipedia:Etiquette#Principles of Wikipedia etiquette|this]]: \u201cDo not ignore questions.\u201d '''''[[A]] [[person]] [[Who (pronoun)|who]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|has been]] [[Help:Editing|editing]] [[Wikipedia]]  +++$+++ ::::::Can you be so kind to just read [[Wikipedia:Etiquette#Principles of Wikipedia etiquette|this]]: “Do not ignore questions.” '''''[[A]] [[person]] [[Who (pronoun)|who]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|has been]] [[Help:Editing|editing]] [[Wikipedia]] [[User:Since 10.28.2010|since]] [[Thursday]][[Comma|,]] [[October]] [[October 28|28]], [[2010]][[Full stop|.]]''''' 03:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
5317 +++$+++  +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5308 +++$+++ 5313 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 05:50:00 +++$+++ 1.310820600E09 +++$+++ Can you be so kind as to provide a reason that you are not responding to my comments? I asked you kindly what \u201cspoil the kitten-eating monsters\u201d means or refers to, and so far I haven't a clue what it is. If you're purposely ignoring me and amusingly looking at my comments to see my funny responses just to piss me off, then I will depart from your talk page. Just please provide a reason why. And why are you trying to be sarcastic and piss me off: \u201cYou're excused.\u201d \u201cThey don't exist? No, really? <del>{{=)|surprise}}<\/del>\u201d I really don't want to piss anyone off, and I really don't want to start a fight, but what the hell is your problem? I mean, why are you teasing me saying \u201cThey don't exist? No, really? <del>{{=)|surprise}}<\/del>\u201d? I mean, what the hell are you trying to accomplish? I am trying to find out what \u201cspoil the kitten-eating monsters\u201d means. Why? Just for the fun of it. I mean, why not? Am I restricted to a certin number of metaphors in the original mediokre vocabulary that I was born with (nothing)? I really don't want to piss anyone off, but you, sir (or madam), are pushing the line here, and just to let you know, I'm getting very angry. The purpose of me being here is to see if you would be so kind as to provide me with the definition of \u201cspoil the kitten-eating monsters\u201d. Look, some people say that I usually take things very offensively, and yes, that is true. So am I missing what you're saying, or what? If you are indeed trying to piss me off, then please read [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]], one of the basic pillars of Wikipedia. Also, please [http:\/\/meta.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Don%27t_be_a_dick don't be a dick]. I really don't see why you are trying to play this strange \u201cgame\u201d. I would like to request your point of view: when you were typing the comment, how did you think I would react? Were you suprised when I reacted? Or is this a joke? Or do you just personally hate me? If your anger is on my user signature, then please [[Wikipedia:Forgive and forget|forgive and forget]], as I have shrinked my username to normal size. It is still a work-in-progress. Honestly, if you're still mad, just [[Wikipedia:Get over it|get over it]]. Look, I'm sorry if I pissed you off in any way at any point it time, but you're just going to have to [[Wikipedia:Accepting other users|accept it]]. Anyway: please be so kind as to bring me an explanation as to why you won't tell me what \u201cspoil the kitten-eating monsters\u201d is? I apperciate all the trouble you have been through, and I thank you for any and all help. Thanks again, '''''[[A]] [[person]] [[Who (pronoun)|who]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|has been]] [[Help:Editing|editing]] [[Wikipedia]]  +++$+++ ::::::Can you be so kind as to provide a reason that you are not responding to my comments? I asked you kindly what “spoil the kitten-eating monsters” means or refers to, and so far I haven't a clue what it is. If you're purposely ignoring me and amusingly looking at my comments to see my funny responses just to piss me off, then I will depart from your talk page. Just please provide a reason why. And why are you trying to be sarcastic and piss me off: “You're excused.” “They don't exist? No, really? <del>{{=)|surprise}}</del>” I really don't want to piss anyone off, and I really don't want to start a fight, but what the hell is your problem? I mean, why are you teasing me saying “They don't exist? No, really? <del>{{=)|surprise}}</del>”? I mean, what the hell are you trying to accomplish? I am trying to find out what “spoil the kitten-eating monsters” means. Why? Just for the fun of it. I mean, why not? Am I restricted to a certin number of metaphors in the original mediokre vocabulary that I was born with (nothing)? I really don't want to piss anyone off, but you, sir (or madam), are pushing the line here, and just to let you know, I'm getting very angry. The purpose of me being here is to see if you would be so kind as to provide me with the definition of “spoil the kitten-eating monsters”. Look, some people say that I usually take things very offensively, and yes, that is true. So am I missing what you're saying, or what? If you are indeed trying to piss me off, then please read [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]], one of the basic pillars of Wikipedia. Also, please [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_be_a_dick don't be a dick]. I really don't see why you are trying to play this strange “game”. I would like to request your point of view: when you were typing the comment, how did you think I would react? Were you suprised when I reacted? Or is this a joke? Or do you just personally hate me? If your anger is on my user signature, then please [[Wikipedia:Forgive and forget|forgive and forget]], as I have shrinked my username to normal size. It is still a work-in-progress. Honestly, if you're still mad, just [[Wikipedia:Get over it|get over it]]. Look, I'm sorry if I pissed you off in any way at any point it time, but you're just going to have to [[Wikipedia:Accepting other users|accept it]]. Anyway: please be so kind as to bring me an explanation as to why you won't tell me what “spoil the kitten-eating monsters” is? I apperciate all the trouble you have been through, and I thank you for any and all help. Thanks again, '''''[[A]] [[person]] [[Who (pronoun)|who]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|has been]] [[Help:Editing|editing]] [[Wikipedia]] [[User:Since 10.28.2010|since]] [[Thursday]][[Comma|,]] [[October]] [[October 28|28]], [[2010]][[Full stop|.]]''''' 05:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
5318 +++$+++ Since 10.28.2010 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5308 +++$+++ 5313 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310861580E09 +++$+++ Do you, like only answer the first question that precedes a question mark in a person's comment? Oh, I guess my previous question is the only one out of many being answered, right? Are you a Bot? Why do you hate me so much? Why are you not responding? Are you like, taking a Wiki'''Since10.28.2010'''Break? What's your problem? Why are you unresponsive? Why can't you respond to a simple question? Are you a [http:\/\/meta.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Don%27t_be_a_dick dick]? Why are you trying to piss me off? Please see this whole section, where in the eight comments I have written, and the thirty-two questions I have asked, only two of them have been answered, both with very sarcastic and crude humor. I really don't want to piss you off, but (quoting from above) \u201cwhat the hell is your problem?\u201d Please tell me what \u201cspoil the kitten-eating monsters\u201d means. ''''' +++$+++ ::::::Do you, like only answer the first question that precedes a question mark in a person's comment? Oh, I guess my previous question is the only one out of many being answered, right? Are you a Bot? Why do you hate me so much? Why are you not responding? Are you like, taking a Wiki'''Since10.28.2010'''Break? What's your problem? Why are you unresponsive? Why can't you respond to a simple question? Are you a [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_be_a_dick dick]? Why are you trying to piss me off? Please see this whole section, where in the eight comments I have written, and the thirty-two questions I have asked, only two of them have been answered, both with very sarcastic and crude humor. I really don't want to piss you off, but (quoting from above) “what the hell is your problem?” Please tell me what “spoil the kitten-eating monsters” means. '''''[[User:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="gold">A</font>]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="gold">person who has been editing Wikipedia since Thursday, October 28, 2010.</font>]]''''' 17:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

267453 +++$+++ Rjgibb +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267453 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-16 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.195219800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the comments. I figure if you can't write a decent article about the place where you grew up then you'll never be able to write a good article! I thoroughly enjoyed doing it and glad another editor appreciates the work. Many thanks  +++$+++ Thanks for the comments. I figure if you can't write a decent article about the place where you grew up then you'll never be able to write a good article! I thoroughly enjoyed doing it and glad another editor appreciates the work. Many thanks [[User:Rjgibb|Dick G]] 05:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
267454 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267453 +++$+++ 267453 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.195256880E09 +++$+++ It is not only a \"decent\" article but well done. No rambling overkill as is frequently the case, plus visually is is lovely with good placement of photos.   +++$+++ :It is not only a "decent" article but well done. No rambling overkill as is frequently the case, plus visually is is lovely with good placement of photos.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 15:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

267455 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267455 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-16 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.195257120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] 15:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
267456 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267455 +++$+++ 267455 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.195258320E09 +++$+++ Done!   +++$+++ :Done!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 16:12, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

529600 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-24 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.214298360E09 +++$+++ Whoops...forgot to sign.....  +++$+++ Whoops...forgot to sign..... [[User:JLG 2701|JLG]] [[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]] 02:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
529601 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529600 +++$+++ 529600 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.214344740E09 +++$+++ Thank-you.  I didn't realize it was a hybridization of simple html and wiki code.  +++$+++ :Thank-you.  I didn't realize it was a hybridization of simple html and wiki code. [[User:JLG 2701|JLG]] [[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]] 14:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

267458 +++$+++ 121.209.160.15 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267458 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-17 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.195334520E09 +++$+++ On October 21st, you added a the advert and fiction tags to the [[Rappelz]] article. I am currently working on a [[Talk:Rappelz#Complete_rewrite|rewrite of this article]] (which has become quite an exquisite example of what poor maintenance can do to a page) and I would like your input into what can be done to address your concerns. Thanks. --Anon [[Special:Contributions\/121.209.160.15|121.209.160.15]] ( +++$+++ On October 21st, you added a the advert and fiction tags to the [[Rappelz]] article. I am currently working on a [[Talk:Rappelz#Complete_rewrite|rewrite of this article]] (which has become quite an exquisite example of what poor maintenance can do to a page) and I would like your input into what can be done to address your concerns. Thanks. --Anon [[Special:Contributions/121.209.160.15|121.209.160.15]] ([[User talk:121.209.160.15|talk]]) 13:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
267459 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267458 +++$+++ 267458 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.195337040E09 +++$+++ Answered on article [[Rappelz]] talk page.  +++$+++ :Answered on article [[Rappelz]] talk page. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

88267 +++$+++ mikkalai +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-02-23 09:16:00 +++$+++ 1.077556560E09 +++$+++ I see, you started a number of new pages for peoples. Please see [[The Red Book of the Peoples of the Russian Empire]] and its talk page. It seems that the whole Red Book may be put into wikipedia.  +++$+++ I see, you started a number of new pages for peoples. Please see [[The Red Book of the Peoples of the Russian Empire]] and its talk page. It seems that the whole Red Book may be put into wikipedia. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 09:16, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
88268 +++$+++ Shallot +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88267 +++$+++ 88267 +++$+++ 2004-02-23 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.077573240E09 +++$+++ Cool. I was editing [[Turkic people]] and noticed how many don't have pages (I wonder if even half of the Dagestani nations have an article), and went ahead to correlate most of them to the parts of the Russian Federation where they live in because that's at least something. -- +++$+++ : Cool. I was editing [[Turkic people]] and noticed how many don't have pages (I wonder if even half of the Dagestani nations have an article), and went ahead to correlate most of them to the parts of the Russian Federation where they live in because that's at least something. --[[User:Shallot|Shallot]] 13:54, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
88269 +++$+++ Shallot +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88267 +++$+++ 88267 +++$+++ 2004-02-26 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.077845220E09 +++$+++ So kindly explain that in the submission or on the talk page, don't litter pages with endless copy&pastes. -- +++$+++ : So kindly explain that in the submission or on the talk page, don't litter pages with endless copy&pastes. --[[User:Shallot|Shallot]] 17:27, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)

267460 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-17 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.195336740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 13:59, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
267461 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267460 +++$+++ 267460 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.195337160E09 +++$+++ It just needs a few grammatical changes. I will work on it now.   +++$+++ :It just needs a few grammatical changes. I will work on it now.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

568865 +++$+++ Wareh +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568865 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-26 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.159305360E09 +++$+++ At [[User talk:168.10.112.2]], you apparently blocked the user for vandalism on 4 August 2006.  The user [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Protagoras&diff=77895340&oldid=77664854 blatantly vandalized] [[Protagoras]] today, and I'm wondering if the IP address oughtn't to be reblocked.  (It serves multiple users through the Georgia Dept. of Ed., but the contribution history seems mostly vandalism.)   +++$+++ At [[User talk:168.10.112.2]], you apparently blocked the user for vandalism on 4 August 2006.  The user [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Protagoras&diff=77895340&oldid=77664854 blatantly vandalized] [[Protagoras]] today, and I'm wondering if the IP address oughtn't to be reblocked.  (It serves multiple users through the Georgia Dept. of Ed., but the contribution history seems mostly vandalism.)  [[User:Wareh|Wareh]] 14:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
568866 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568865 +++$+++ 568865 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.159307580E09 +++$+++ As the last warning was a blatant vandal tag, I have reblocked the IP vandal for one week.  Thanks for letting me know! You can report these vandal attacks at [[WP:AIV]], which may get a quicker response than leaving a message on an individual's Talk page. Regards, <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :As the last warning was a blatant vandal tag, I have reblocked the IP vandal for one week.  Thanks for letting me know! You can report these vandal attacks at [[WP:AIV]], which may get a quicker response than leaving a message on an individual's Talk page. Regards, <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''(aeropa'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''gitica)'''</font>]]</span> 14:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

5320 +++$+++ Shakesomeaction +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-16 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310880000E09 +++$+++ I have read your comments [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons\/Noticeboard#Our_category_system:_Minority-tagging here] and I absolutely agree with everything you are saying. It is so good to find someone else on Wiki who understands this stuff. -- +++$+++ I have read your comments [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Our_category_system:_Minority-tagging here] and I absolutely agree with everything you are saying. It is so good to find someone else on Wiki who understands this stuff. --[[User:Shakesomeaction|Shakesomeaction]] ([[User talk:Shakesomeaction|talk]]) 22:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
5321 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5320 +++$+++ 5320 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.310880660E09 +++$+++ Sadly, I mirror the real world. I am the minority, LOL. --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Sadly, I mirror the real world. I am the minority, LOL. --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 22:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

267465 +++$+++ Dorftrottel +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267465 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-19 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.195508520E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/MONGO_3&diff=prev&oldid=172391885 this] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/MONGO_3&diff=prev&oldid=172392144 this]: Um, I'm not sure what you mean with \"admin in-group\". There are several non-admins who signed\/commented there, and it's fully appropriate for us to do so. | +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/MONGO_3&diff=prev&oldid=172391885 this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/MONGO_3&diff=prev&oldid=172392144 this]: Um, I'm not sure what you mean with "admin in-group". There are several non-admins who signed/commented there, and it's fully appropriate for us to do so. |[[User:Dorftrottel|dorf]]trottel |[[User talk:Dorftrottel|humor me]] 13:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
267466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267465 +++$+++ 267465 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.195510500E09 +++$+++ The very fact that you actually noticed anything I did relevant to the RFC and bothered to ask me what I mean indicates to me that you are not one of the \"admin in-group\". I did not mean to imply that all editors involved are part of the \"admin in-group\" and I am sorry that it sounded like I did so. I certainly was not including you in that statement, and there are others that I do not include. Please accept my apologies.  +++$+++ :The very fact that you actually noticed anything I did relevant to the RFC and bothered to ask me what I mean indicates to me that you are not one of the "admin in-group". I did not mean to imply that all editors involved are part of the "admin in-group" and I am sorry that it sounded like I did so. I certainly was not including you in that statement, and there are others that I do not include. Please accept my apologies. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
267467 +++$+++ Dorftrottel +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267465 +++$+++ 267466 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.195516620E09 +++$+++ No apology necessary whatsoever. I was just wondering if you somehow thought only admins may comment there. I'm certainly not a \"member\", mainly because I'm not an admin :D | +++$+++ ::No apology necessary whatsoever. I was just wondering if you somehow thought only admins may comment there. I'm certainly not a "member", mainly because I'm not an admin :D |[[User:Dorftrottel|dorf]]trottel |[[User talk:Dorftrottel|humor me]] 15:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

5322 +++$+++ Since 10.28.2010 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5322 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-17 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.310904540E09 +++$+++ Please tell me why you are ignoring me. It is <del>almost close to<\/del> clear to <del>you<\/del> all that you are, seeing that you replied to the above comment. ''''' +++$+++ Please tell me why you are ignoring me. It is <del>almost close to</del> clear to <del>you</del> all that you are, seeing that you replied to the above comment. '''''[[User:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="gold">A</font>]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="gold">user who has been editing Wikipedia since Thursday, October 28, 2010.</font>]]''''' 05:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
5323 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5322 +++$+++ 5322 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.310933160E09 +++$+++ Please read what Calmer Waters has posted in your talk page. Everything, not just the reason why I am not replying. Thank you.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Please read what Calmer Waters has posted in your talk page. Everything, not just the reason why I am not replying. Thank you.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 13:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

267468 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-19 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.195521960E09 +++$+++ A requested article I just started.  Thought you might like to take a quick look as it is probably related to your area of expertise. Don't know if the treatment section has a global perspective at the mo, or just reflects how it's dealt with in the UK. +++$+++ A requested article I just started.  Thought you might like to take a quick look as it is probably related to your area of expertise. Don't know if the treatment section has a global perspective at the mo, or just reflects how it's dealt with in the UK.[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] ([[User talk:Merkinsmum|talk]]) 17:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
267469 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267468 +++$+++ 267468 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.195533840E09 +++$+++ It is an interesting topic, much more complicated than I would have originally thought. The [[competence (law)]] article is geared to criminal competence\/incompetence. I know there are various competencies related to civil competence, e.g. competence to handle one's own finances etc. It is really not strictly a psychological issues, as I read these articles. If you could nail it down in a few days, it could be a [[Wikipedia:Did you know|DYK]], as I bet it is not something many people have thought about.   +++$+++ :It is an interesting topic, much more complicated than I would have originally thought. The [[competence (law)]] article is geared to criminal competence/incompetence. I know there are various competencies related to civil competence, e.g. competence to handle one's own finances etc. It is really not strictly a psychological issues, as I read these articles. If you could nail it down in a few days, it could be a [[Wikipedia:Did you know|DYK]], as I bet it is not something many people have thought about.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 20:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
267470 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267468 +++$+++ 267469 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.195534440E09 +++$+++ The summary of this book [http:\/\/haworthpress.com\/store\/product.asp?sku=2016] sums up the complexity well.  +++$+++ ::The summary of this book [http://haworthpress.com/store/product.asp?sku=2016] sums up the complexity well. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 20:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
267471 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267468 +++$+++ 267470 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.195535760E09 +++$+++ I put [[mental competence]] at first but there was no such article lol.  I'm sure there's an article about that part of it, there's probably a proper name for it.  In the UK if a person lacks mental competence or whatever the proper word is, it can lead in some cases to [[power of attorney]] over their finances etc. being given to their next of kin or maybe even a social worker (?) +++$+++ :::I put [[mental competence]] at first but there was no such article lol.  I'm sure there's an article about that part of it, there's probably a proper name for it.  In the UK if a person lacks mental competence or whatever the proper word is, it can lead in some cases to [[power of attorney]] over their finances etc. being given to their next of kin or maybe even a social worker (?)[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] ([[User talk:Merkinsmum|talk]]) 21:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
267472 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267468 +++$+++ 267471 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.195536240E09 +++$+++ I don't think there is, as I wrote the one for Competence (law) and deliberately made it criminal because it fit my needs (selfish) and I didn't feel like looking up all the civil stuff.   +++$+++ ::::I don't think there is, as I wrote the one for Competence (law) and deliberately made it criminal because it fit my needs (selfish) and I didn't feel like looking up all the civil stuff.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 21:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
267473 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267468 +++$+++ 267472 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.195537500E09 +++$+++ How about... [[capacity (law)]]?  Not far off.:) +++$+++ :::::How about... [[capacity (law)]]?  Not far off.:)[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] ([[User talk:Merkinsmum|talk]]) 21:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
267474 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267468 +++$+++ 267473 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.195537620E09 +++$+++ Yes, that seems to be it!   +++$+++ ::::::Yes, that seems to be it!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 21:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

529613 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529613 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-28 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.214697420E09 +++$+++ I'm writing a new article, and a few photos I would like to use to illustrate the article, are yours.  I noticed that you stated that they could be used on wiki, provided they were attributed to you.  What would you suggest I put as an attribute to credit you with the photos.  If you would like to see the project before it hits wiki, the page is sitting in my [[User:JLG 2701\/Sandbox|Sandbox]] <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ I'm writing a new article, and a few photos I would like to use to illustrate the article, are yours.  I noticed that you stated that they could be used on wiki, provided they were attributed to you.  What would you suggest I put as an attribute to credit you with the photos.  If you would like to see the project before it hits wiki, the page is sitting in my [[User:JLG 2701/Sandbox|Sandbox]] <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 16:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
529614 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529613 +++$+++ 529613 +++$+++ 2008-06-28 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.214705040E09 +++$+++ BTW...can you refresh my memory of what DIRT stands for.....I can't find them online anymore.  All I can find is their new UMP pages. As far as references, I have a few copies of Circle Track here (for the ASA Mods section), and some online articles and\/or websites to go off of for the rest.  I like the paragraph you have on your mods pix page.  <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ :BTW...can you refresh my memory of what DIRT stands for.....I can't find them online anymore.  All I can find is their new UMP pages. As far as references, I have a few copies of Circle Track here (for the ASA Mods section), and some online articles and/or websites to go off of for the rest.  I like the paragraph you have on your mods pix page.  <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 19:04, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
529615 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529613 +++$+++ 529614 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.214739360E09 +++$+++ When I get a chance, I'll do some other research online to see if I can find the facts I'm needing in regards to the Whelen series. <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ ::When I get a chance, I'll do some other research online to see if I can find the facts I'm needing in regards to the Whelen series. <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 04:36, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
529616 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529613 +++$+++ 529615 +++$+++ 2008-06-30 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.214871660E09 +++$+++ '''<font color=\"#000000\">R<\/font><font color=\"#FFCC00\">b<\/font>''', How are you at asking permission to use photos?  I've found a few that I'd like to use on the Mods project, but I have no idea on how to go about it (nor will I have the luck to secure fair-use of said pix either...LOL).  Give me a shout, and let me know what you can\/are willing to do.  I will leave a link to the pix on my mods project page.  <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ :::'''<font color="#000000">R</font><font color="#FFCC00">b</font>''', How are you at asking permission to use photos?  I've found a few that I'd like to use on the Mods project, but I have no idea on how to go about it (nor will I have the luck to secure fair-use of said pix either...LOL).  Give me a shout, and let me know what you can/are willing to do.  I will leave a link to the pix on my mods project page.  <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 17:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
529617 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529613 +++$+++ 529616 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.214905740E09 +++$+++ BTW, thanks for the clean-ups on the article!!!  <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ ::::BTW, thanks for the clean-ups on the article!!!  <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 02:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
529618 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529613 +++$+++ 529617 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.214974140E09 +++$+++ '''<font color=\"#000000\">R<\/font><font color=\"#FFCC00\">b<\/font>''', I'm not really sure what to call our article.  \"Modified racing in the US\" has a nice ring to it.  <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ :::::'''<font color="#000000">R</font><font color="#FFCC00">b</font>''', I'm not really sure what to call our article.  "Modified racing in the US" has a nice ring to it.  <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 21:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

5328 +++$+++ TParis +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311066060E09 +++$+++ Uhh what?  The only thing the user can't delete off their talk page are sanctions, MfD tags, and speedy deletion tags.  If the user deletes a discussion already in effect, consider taking it to [[WP:WQA]] or [[WP:DR]] or your own talk page.--v\/r -  +++$+++ Uhh what?  The only thing the user can't delete off their talk page are sanctions, MfD tags, and speedy deletion tags.  If the user deletes a discussion already in effect, consider taking it to [[WP:WQA]] or [[WP:DR]] or your own talk page.--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 02:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
5329 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5328 +++$+++ 5328 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.311066540E09 +++$+++ Yes it's a case of etiquette, and no thanks, taking them to Yet Another Noticeboard does not fix the problem. I dislike bureaucratic approaches to simple problems. Do ''you'' remove long discussions in your talk page a few hours (or even minutes) after replying to them and leaving the posters flailing around for diffs just so they know what you wrote? Since 10.28.2010 leaves talkback templates which is nice, but on clicking them, I often don't see where the discussion went at all. This is considering the importance of the things being discussed in Since 10.28.2010's talk page. I wonder how much you know of the issues in question.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Yes it's a case of etiquette, and no thanks, taking them to Yet Another Noticeboard does not fix the problem. I dislike bureaucratic approaches to simple problems. Do ''you'' remove long discussions in your talk page a few hours (or even minutes) after replying to them and leaving the posters flailing around for diffs just so they know what you wrote? Since 10.28.2010 leaves talkback templates which is nice, but on clicking them, I often don't see where the discussion went at all. This is considering the importance of the things being discussed in Since 10.28.2010's talk page. I wonder how much you know of the issues in question.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 02:09, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
5330 +++$+++ TParis +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5328 +++$+++ 5329 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311066840E09 +++$+++ I've been paying attention.  The point is you can't enforce a considerate etiquette if it's not supported by policy.  It's the difference between asking a favor and enforcing a policy.  There is no policy to enforce.  At this point, you can ask nicely that they quit interfering with the flow of the discussion or take it somewhere where they cant interfere with the flow of the discussion.--v\/r -  +++$+++ ::I've been paying attention.  The point is you can't enforce a considerate etiquette if it's not supported by policy.  It's the difference between asking a favor and enforcing a policy.  There is no policy to enforce.  At this point, you can ask nicely that they quit interfering with the flow of the discussion or take it somewhere where they cant interfere with the flow of the discussion.--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 02:14, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
5331 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5328 +++$+++ 5330 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.311067200E09 +++$+++ You mean lump more problems for the user already straining under the number of things being piled up against him including a (very unwarranted, imo) indefinite block? No thanks. If it can be solved by simply telling him, then I tell him. At no point did I say that he is ''required'' to do this.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::You mean lump more problems for the user already straining under the number of things being piled up against him including a (very unwarranted, imo) indefinite block? No thanks. If it can be solved by simply telling him, then I tell him. At no point did I say that he is ''required'' to do this.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 02:20, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
5332 +++$+++ Calmer Waters +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5328 +++$+++ 5331 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.311070560E09 +++$+++ Oh my [http:\/\/stats.grok.se\/en\/latest\/User_talk:Since_10.28.2010]. Related to those having to dig through removed diffs perhaps.  +++$+++ ::::Oh my [http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/User_talk:Since_10.28.2010]. Related to those having to dig through removed diffs perhaps. [[User:Calmer Waters|<span style="color:black">'''''Calmer'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Calmer Waters|<span style="color:Blue">'''''Waters'''''</span>]] 03:16, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
5333 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5328 +++$+++ 5332 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.311080940E09 +++$+++ Yep, exactly that.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::::Yep, exactly that.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 06:09, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

568867 +++$+++ Georgewilliamherbert +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-26 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.159328340E09 +++$+++ Hi.  The owner of the Evil Ted (tm) account complained to unblock-en-l about the username block on their account.  I would like to initiate a query as to why you felt the username was inappropriate or inflammatory; it doesn't seem obviously either to me on first inspection. Thank you.   +++$+++ Hi.  The owner of the Evil Ted (tm) account complained to unblock-en-l about the username block on their account.  I would like to initiate a query as to why you felt the username was inappropriate or inflammatory; it doesn't seem obviously either to me on first inspection. Thank you.  [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] 20:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
568868 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568867 +++$+++ 568867 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.159329540E09 +++$+++ The username [[User:Evil-ted\u2122|Evil-ted\u2122]] contains a special character, the trademark symbol, which has to be entered as '''ALT+0153''', making the username difficult to enter correctly. [[WP:USERNAME]] recommends using Latin-based alphanumeric characters in order to render correctly in browsers.  It can be changed to  +++$+++ :The username [[User:Evil-ted™|Evil-ted™]] contains a special character, the trademark symbol, which has to be entered as '''ALT+0153''', making the username difficult to enter correctly. [[WP:USERNAME]] recommends using Latin-based alphanumeric characters in order to render correctly in browsers.  It can be changed to [[User:Evil-ted_(tm)|Evil-ted (tm)]] easily enough, as in your example above.  This will render correctly in all browsers that are loaded with Latin-based character sets and requires no additional keystrokes in order to be typed out, as opposed to the existing name. <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''(aeropa'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''gitica)'''</font>]]</span> 20:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

267476 +++$+++ AO +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267476 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-20 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.195625700E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know I left a comment for you. \xb7 <font face=\"Times New Roman\"> +++$+++ Just to let you know I left a comment for you. · <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:AndonicO|'''A'''''ndonic'''''O''']] <sup>[[User talk:AO|''Talk'']]</sup></font> 22:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
267477 +++$+++ AO +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267476 +++$+++ 267476 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.195632000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the quick reply; that clears a few things up. \xb7 <font face=\"Times New Roman\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for the quick reply; that clears a few things up. · <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:AndonicO|'''A'''''ndonic'''''O''']] <sup>[[User talk:AO|''Talk'']]</sup></font> 00:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

529621 +++$+++ Truthanado +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-29 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.214730360E09 +++$+++ I don't understand why you reverted the edit that removed Sprint Cup Series from the article and wikilinked Winston Cup Series directly to it. Could you explain please. Why does the \"reader have to know\" when Alan Kulwiki never had anything to do with the Sprint Cup Series; he competed in Winston Cup. To include Sprint Cup in this article causes more confusion, not less, especially among those who do not follow NASCAR as I have for the past 20 years.  +++$+++ I don't understand why you reverted the edit that removed Sprint Cup Series from the article and wikilinked Winston Cup Series directly to it. Could you explain please. Why does the "reader have to know" when Alan Kulwiki never had anything to do with the Sprint Cup Series; he competed in Winston Cup. To include Sprint Cup in this article causes more confusion, not less, especially among those who do not follow NASCAR as I have for the past 20 years. [[User:Truthanado|Truthanado]] ([[User talk:Truthanado|talk]]) 02:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
529622 +++$+++ Truthanado +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529621 +++$+++ 529621 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.214771880E09 +++$+++ It would be interesting to see what comments the Wikimunnity would have if someone were to change the [[Manchester United]] article (and those of other English football teams) to change all occurrences of \"Premier League\" to \"Premier League (now the Barclay's Premier League)\". Just because the sponsor changes does not mean all of the pre-sponsor references to it have to change; that's one of the main purposes of wikilinks and redirects. I guess we will just have to agree that we disagree on this and leave it at that. Cheers.  +++$+++ :It would be interesting to see what comments the Wikimunnity would have if someone were to change the [[Manchester United]] article (and those of other English football teams) to change all occurrences of "Premier League" to "Premier League (now the Barclay's Premier League)". Just because the sponsor changes does not mean all of the pre-sponsor references to it have to change; that's one of the main purposes of wikilinks and redirects. I guess we will just have to agree that we disagree on this and leave it at that. Cheers. [[User:Truthanado|Truthanado]] ([[User talk:Truthanado|talk]]) 13:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

5335 +++$+++  Sharktopus +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5335 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311123180E09 +++$+++ ... and, as dear old BBC puts it so elegantly, \"[http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/nature\/14122050 Stick insects survive one million years without sex].\" Sadly, our Wikipedia article for the genus ''[[Timema]]'' has been just a stub; they weren't getting any action in here either.  But now I'm working to get them into DYK, where perhaps some cute guy stick insects will catch sight of them and natural history will be made. It was fun working with you on [[Snowmastodon site]], where you did magnificent stuff, so if you'd like to join me, come on and pitch in. I wish we had a photo. <font style=\"font-family:sans-serif;color:black;\"> <span style=\"text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml\">  ''''' +++$+++ ... and, as dear old BBC puts it so elegantly, "[http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/14122050 Stick insects survive one million years without sex]." Sadly, our Wikipedia article for the genus ''[[Timema]]'' has been just a stub; they weren't getting any action in here either.  But now I'm working to get them into DYK, where perhaps some cute guy stick insects will catch sight of them and natural history will be made. It was fun working with you on [[Snowmastodon site]], where you did magnificent stuff, so if you'd like to join me, come on and pitch in. I wish we had a photo. <font style="font-family:sans-serif;color:black;"> <span style="text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml">  '''''[[User:Sharktopus|Sharktopus]]'''''</span> [[user talk: Sharktopus|<sup>talk</sup></font>]] 17:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
5336 +++$+++  Sharktopus +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5335 +++$+++ 5335 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311585000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pitching in \u2013 I think it turned out pretty well. I nominated ''[[Timema]]'' today at DYK in both our names. <font style=\"font-family:sans-serif;color:black;\"> <span style=\"text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml\">  ''''' +++$+++ :Thanks for pitching in – I think it turned out pretty well. I nominated ''[[Timema]]'' today at DYK in both our names. <font style="font-family:sans-serif;color:black;"> <span style="text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml">  '''''[[User:Sharktopus|Sharktopus]]'''''</span> [[user talk: Sharktopus|<sup>talk</sup></font>]] 02:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
5337 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5335 +++$+++ 5336 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.311612000E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Though I hope you included the others who contributed as well to the article, heh. There were at least two others IIRC. Anyway, still needs reworking of the order of subsections and the wording, but I've been very busy IRL lately. I'm just glad I managed to convince someone to donate a pic of them. :) Will see if I can improve it further while still pending for review in DYK. --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::You're welcome. Though I hope you included the others who contributed as well to the article, heh. There were at least two others IIRC. Anyway, still needs reworking of the order of subsections and the wording, but I've been very busy IRL lately. I'm just glad I managed to convince someone to donate a pic of them. :) Will see if I can improve it further while still pending for review in DYK. --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 09:40, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

267480 +++$+++ Kablammo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267480 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-20 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.195605240E09 +++$+++ Hello.  While I have added a <nowiki>{{Citation needed}}<\/nowiki> to your interesting article, I don't think the proposition is needed at all.  From your article and sources is seems clear that the colony took its guidance from the bible.  It goes too far, I think, to say that the basis of English common law is biblical (although no doubt it was an influence).  Regards,   +++$+++ Hello.  While I have added a <nowiki>{{Citation needed}}</nowiki> to your interesting article, I don't think the proposition is needed at all.  From your article and sources is seems clear that the colony took its guidance from the bible.  It goes too far, I think, to say that the basis of English common law is biblical (although no doubt it was an influence).  Regards,  [[User:Kablammo|Kablammo]] ([[User talk:Kablammo|talk]]) 16:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
267481 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267480 +++$+++ 267480 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.195608360E09 +++$+++ Citation added. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Citation added. Thanks. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
267482 +++$+++ Kablammo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267480 +++$+++ 267481 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.195635360E09 +++$+++ I raised the question presented above at [[WP:LAW]].  They have some suggestions at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Law#Common_law_historian_needed]].  Regards,  +++$+++ ::I raised the question presented above at [[WP:LAW]].  They have some suggestions at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Law#Common_law_historian_needed]].  Regards, [[User:Kablammo|Kablammo]] ([[User talk:Kablammo|talk]]) 00:56, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

529625 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-01 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.214912340E09 +++$+++ Usually bots are employed to empty categories, but I don't know which are used. Try contacting [[User:VegaDark]]; he's far more involved in UCfDs that I am. Cheers. -- +++$+++ Usually bots are employed to empty categories, but I don't know which are used. Try contacting [[User:VegaDark]]; he's far more involved in UCfDs that I am. Cheers. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride|talk]]) 04:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
529626 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529625 +++$+++ 529625 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.214914380E09 +++$+++ Thanks! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thanks! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
529627 +++$+++ VegaDark +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529625 +++$+++ 529626 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.214914680E09 +++$+++ The users that had (and still have) the userbox can be found [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:WhatLinksHere\/User:Miller17CU94\/Userboxes\/User_NHRA here].  Hope that helps!  +++$+++ ::The users that had (and still have) the userbox can be found [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Miller17CU94/Userboxes/User_NHRA here].  Hope that helps! [[User:VegaDark|VegaDark]] ([[User talk:VegaDark|talk]]) 05:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
529628 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529625 +++$+++ 529627 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.214914800E09 +++$+++ Your ears must have been ringing! Thanks for answering. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Your ears must have been ringing! Thanks for answering. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

5338 +++$+++ Since 10.28.2010 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5338 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.311154920E09 +++$+++ I would just like to drop a friendly line that I have changed my username. I believe that you were requesting that I change my username at the Help Desk. Thank you. PS: I would like to sincerely, officially, and formally apologize, on any past disagreements and\/or misunderstandings that we have had in the past. I've placed a request for mentorship for [[User talk:Worm That Turned|User:Worm That Turned]] (for myself). I hope we can have a new and refreshed relationship here at Wikipedia. Hmm, what say you? Thanks again, ''''' +++$+++ I would just like to drop a friendly line that I have changed my username. I believe that you were requesting that I change my username at the Help Desk. Thank you. PS: I would like to sincerely, officially, and formally apologize, on any past disagreements and/or misunderstandings that we have had in the past. I've placed a request for mentorship for [[User talk:Worm That Turned|User:Worm That Turned]] (for myself). I hope we can have a new and refreshed relationship here at Wikipedia. Hmm, what say you? Thanks again, '''''[[User:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="#DAA520">An</font>]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="#DAA520">editor since 10.28.2010.</font>]]''''' 02:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
5339 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5338 +++$+++ 5338 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 10:17:00 +++$+++ 1.311182220E09 +++$+++ Apologies accepted and I apologize as well for any manifestations of my notoriously short temper, heh. :) Good luck with your mentorship. --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Apologies accepted and I apologize as well for any manifestations of my notoriously short temper, heh. :) Good luck with your mentorship. --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 10:17, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
5340 +++$+++ Since 10.28.2010 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5338 +++$+++ 5339 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311199140E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Apologizing for my short temper as well (see notice <del>#4<\/del> <del>number four<\/del> #3 on my user talk page). Mentorship is going...well, it's the first day, so I can't really tell. Thank you again, ''''' +++$+++ ::Thank you. Apologizing for my short temper as well (see notice <del>#4</del> <del>number four</del> #3 on my user talk page). Mentorship is going...well, it's the first day, so I can't really tell. Thank you again, '''''[[User:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="#DAA520">An</font>]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="#DAA520">editor since 10.28.2010.</font>]]''''' 14:59, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

267483 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-20 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.195607940E09 +++$+++ Hello.  Just thought I'd let you know that the [[veropedia]] collaboration has copied your article [[Dorothy Talbye Trial]] to http:\/\/en.veropedia.com\/a\/Dorothy%20Talbye%20trial to be preserved as a high quality article.  Good work on the article.  If you're interested in learning more about veropedia, try us at www.veropedia.com or on IRC #veropedia.    Cheers,  +++$+++ Hello.  Just thought I'd let you know that the [[veropedia]] collaboration has copied your article [[Dorothy Talbye Trial]] to http://en.veropedia.com/a/Dorothy%20Talbye%20trial to be preserved as a high quality article.  Good work on the article.  If you're interested in learning more about veropedia, try us at www.veropedia.com or on IRC #veropedia.    Cheers, [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 17:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
267484 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267483 +++$+++ 267483 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.195608300E09 +++$+++ Hey, WilyD, thanks for letting me know. I will check out that site. However, I am not sure how IRC #veropedia works although I will give it a try.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Hey, WilyD, thanks for letting me know. I will check out that site. However, I am not sure how IRC #veropedia works although I will give it a try.  Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
267485 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267483 +++$+++ 267484 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.195609500E09 +++$+++ If you're unfamiliar with [[IRC]] you can get free web access through http:\/\/ircatwork.com\/ (for instance) without any downloads.  Just enter a random nickname and #veropedia as the Channel.  +++$+++ ::If you're unfamiliar with [[IRC]] you can get free web access through http://ircatwork.com/ (for instance) without any downloads.  Just enter a random nickname and #veropedia as the Channel. [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 17:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
267486 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267483 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.195614000E09 +++$+++ It's essentially a chatroom - there are a bunch of Veropedians there who could answer any questions you might have.  But it doesn't seem to me that you're there, unless you've a substantially different nickname.   +++$+++ ::::It's essentially a chatroom - there are a bunch of Veropedians there who could answer any questions you might have.  But it doesn't seem to me that you're there, unless you've a substantially different nickname.  [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 19:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

5341 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.311261780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your article donation to [[WP:Wikiproject Abandoned Drafts|Wikiproject Abandoned Drafts]], we really appreciate it! Hopefully someone will adopt your draft and make something really nice out of it. Feel free to advertise the Wikiproject elsewhere. The more people that know about us, the more drafts that will be donated and the more users there will be to adopt the drafts in the Wikiproject. Again, thank you! <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ Thanks for your article donation to [[WP:Wikiproject Abandoned Drafts|Wikiproject Abandoned Drafts]], we really appreciate it! Hopefully someone will adopt your draft and make something really nice out of it. Feel free to advertise the Wikiproject elsewhere. The more people that know about us, the more drafts that will be donated and the more users there will be to adopt the drafts in the Wikiproject. Again, thank you! <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 08:23, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
5342 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5341 +++$+++ 5341 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.311261780E09 +++$+++ Geez, that sounds like some sort of templated response. It's not, really. I promise. <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ :Geez, that sounds like some sort of templated response. It's not, really. I promise. <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 08:23, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
5343 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5341 +++$+++ 5342 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311263580E09 +++$+++ Haha, it does. But you're very welcome. :) I have a lot on my plate at the moment, and it would simply have languished in my sandbox for a few more months. Had a hard time finding the WikiProject though, I suggest you guys also put links in the usual policy and help pages (like [[Wikipedia:Userspace draft]]) and as an alternative to deletion of stale drafts. It's a very good idea, I must say.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ ::Haha, it does. But you're very welcome. :) I have a lot on my plate at the moment, and it would simply have languished in my sandbox for a few more months. Had a hard time finding the WikiProject though, I suggest you guys also put links in the usual policy and help pages (like [[Wikipedia:Userspace draft]]) and as an alternative to deletion of stale drafts. It's a very good idea, I must say.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 08:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
5344 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5341 +++$+++ 5343 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 09:07:00 +++$+++ 1.311264420E09 +++$+++ Okay, plugged in there and i've also made a talk page section over at [[WP:STALEDRAFT]] to ask how it can be included in there. I guess i'll just have to look around otherwise and see where else it would be appropriate to add a link to the project. And thanks. :3 <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ :::Okay, plugged in there and i've also made a talk page section over at [[WP:STALEDRAFT]] to ask how it can be included in there. I guess i'll just have to look around otherwise and see where else it would be appropriate to add a link to the project. And thanks. :3 <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 09:07, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

267487 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267487 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-21 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.195700580E09 +++$+++ Err, well we're not always busy.  There's typically a bunch of people about.  If you've any questions about the project, ask and I'm sure someone will answer.  If you're interested in becoming involved, we can set you up for that too.  Cheers,  +++$+++ Err, well we're not always busy.  There's typically a bunch of people about.  If you've any questions about the project, ask and I'm sure someone will answer.  If you're interested in becoming involved, we can set you up for that too.  Cheers, [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 19:03, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
267488 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267487 +++$+++ 267487 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.195709280E09 +++$+++ Well, no problem.  Veropedia is a very \"anti-drama\" initiative, and I'd encourage you to come by if you're looking for support with respect to good article writing and no bullshit.  If you're anonymous, you can still ask and we can show you about.  There may be other ways you could contribute if you were interested.  You can email me if you'd prefer a more private discussion, I've my \"email this user\" button enabled. Cheers,  +++$+++ *Well, no problem.  Veropedia is a very "anti-drama" initiative, and I'd encourage you to come by if you're looking for support with respect to good article writing and no bullshit.  If you're anonymous, you can still ask and we can show you about.  There may be other ways you could contribute if you were interested.  You can email me if you'd prefer a more private discussion, I've my "email this user" button enabled. Cheers, [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 21:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

529632 +++$+++ Braandpantiesmatch +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-03 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.215087480E09 +++$+++ Ok i noticed their is no picture of Bobby Hamilton Jr. or Mike Potter, so when i have time i will ad theirs, and i will when have time create page for NASCAR driver J C Stout, as he runs Nationwide & Craftsman Trucks -- +++$+++ Ok i noticed their is no picture of Bobby Hamilton Jr. or Mike Potter, so when i have time i will ad theirs, and i will when have time create page for NASCAR driver J C Stout, as he runs Nationwide & Craftsman Trucks --[[User:Braandpantiesmatch|Braandpantiesmatch]] ([[User talk:Braandpantiesmatch|talk]]) 05:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
529633 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529632 +++$+++ 529632 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.215087780E09 +++$+++ Sounds good! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Sounds good! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

267489 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267489 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-20 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.195617300E09 +++$+++ lol what do you think?:) +++$+++ lol what do you think?:)[[User:Merkinsmum|Merkinsmum]] ([[User talk:Merkinsmum|talk]]) 19:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
267490 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267489 +++$+++ 267489 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.195694220E09 +++$+++ I would help you more but today I am in such a depressed mood regarding Wikipedia that if I write at all, it will have to be about murder and mayhem. Sorry,   +++$+++ :I would help you more but today I am in such a depressed mood regarding Wikipedia that if I write at all, it will have to be about murder and mayhem. Sorry,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

5346 +++$+++ Butcherscross +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311351000E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your feedback on my [[George Mogridge (Old Humphrey)]] article! I'm away for the weekend but I'll move the external links, as you suggest, when I get back. Thanks again.  +++$+++ Many thanks for your feedback on my [[George Mogridge (Old Humphrey)]] article! I'm away for the weekend but I'll move the external links, as you suggest, when I get back. Thanks again. [[User:Butcherscross|Butcherscross]] ([[User talk:Butcherscross|talk]]) 09:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
5347 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5346 +++$+++ 5346 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.311373080E09 +++$+++ No problem. Unlike other issues, inline external links are not that serious. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :No problem. Unlike other issues, inline external links are not that serious. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 15:18, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
5348 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5346 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311999000E09 +++$+++ Hey, sorry, didn't notice your reply until now. Any uninvolved editor (which means you're excluded, heh) can remove it once they can ascertain that no major issues exist with it. I have removed it. Cheers. :) Feel free to ask me if you need help with anything else. --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::Hey, sorry, didn't notice your reply until now. Any uninvolved editor (which means you're excluded, heh) can remove it once they can ascertain that no major issues exist with it. I have removed it. Cheers. :) Feel free to ask me if you need help with anything else. --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 21:10, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
5349 +++$+++ Butcherscross +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5346 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.312008000E09 +++$+++ That's great! Many thanks, Obsidian! It feels like a 'proper' article now that the hatnote has been removed! Thanks yet again for your friendly advice & feedback. +++$+++ :::: That's great! Many thanks, Obsidian! It feels like a 'proper' article now that the hatnote has been removed! Thanks yet again for your friendly advice & feedback.[[User:Butcherscross|Butcherscross]] ([[User talk:Butcherscross|talk]]) 23:40, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
5350 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5346 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312016040E09 +++$+++ Heh, it does. You're very welcome, keep writing more. ;) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::::Heh, it does. You're very welcome, keep writing more. ;) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 01:54, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

267491 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-20 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.195623600E09 +++$+++ Thanks to our collective efforts the article made it to WP:GA.<br> I thought that I should inform you that our efforts have been successful and we promoted the article to a higher level on the quality scale !<br> +++$+++ Thanks to our collective efforts the article made it to WP:GA.<br> I thought that I should inform you that our efforts have been successful and we promoted the article to a higher level on the quality scale !<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">'''Havelock'''</font>]] [[User talk:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">'''датчанин'''</font>]] 21:40, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
267492 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267491 +++$+++ 267491 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.195624620E09 +++$+++ Anyway, there is a vast amount of info. You could have one very global article and then break it down to hemispheres, historical eras, geographic locations, historical importance, political importance -- in other words, any number of ways. More and more as I read, I see that human history is based on trade. I'm overwhelmed!   +++$+++ :Anyway, there is a vast amount of info. You could have one very global article and then break it down to hemispheres, historical eras, geographic locations, historical importance, political importance -- in other words, any number of ways. More and more as I read, I see that human history is based on trade. I'm overwhelmed!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 21:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
267493 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267491 +++$+++ 267492 +++$+++ 2007-11-22 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.195727160E09 +++$+++ The amount of input certainly is gratifying, and I'm beginning to see how an FA nom may make one a better editor. <br>I may not be from as far away as you might think but admittedly I was ignorant about canals, [[Trans-Saharan trade]], [[Inca road system]] etc. and only thought of caravans and stuff.<br> I stumbled upon the article with little experience and little knowledge; section after section was added to it as a result of advice from you and other editors and now the article looks like a mainstream article should !<br> +++$+++ ::The amount of input certainly is gratifying, and I'm beginning to see how an FA nom may make one a better editor. <br>I may not be from as far away as you might think but admittedly I was ignorant about canals, [[Trans-Saharan trade]], [[Inca road system]] etc. and only thought of caravans and stuff.<br> I stumbled upon the article with little experience and little knowledge; section after section was added to it as a result of advice from you and other editors and now the article looks like a mainstream article should !<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">'''Havelock'''</font>]] [[User talk:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">'''датчанин'''</font>]] 02:26, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

529637 +++$+++ Doncram +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529637 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-07 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.215471660E09 +++$+++ Also, about the [[List of RHPs in WI]], i would be glad to help convert county sections into table format, as has been done for Barron, Burnett, Polk counties so far.  That format is nice because it allows for, and effectively calls for, photos of each RHP.  Also it provides latitude and longitude coordinates.  I just added a Google map link to the top, so you can click on that and see the locations of all those having coordinates added already.   There's a tool available which generates the table from NRIS data, with coordinates, for any specific county.  +++$+++ Also, about the [[List of RHPs in WI]], i would be glad to help convert county sections into table format, as has been done for Barron, Burnett, Polk counties so far.  That format is nice because it allows for, and effectively calls for, photos of each RHP.  Also it provides latitude and longitude coordinates.  I just added a Google map link to the top, so you can click on that and see the locations of all those having coordinates added already.   There's a tool available which generates the table from NRIS data, with coordinates, for any specific county. [[User:Doncram|doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 16:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
529638 +++$+++ Doncram +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529637 +++$+++ 529637 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.215520800E09 +++$+++ Anyhow, great that creating tables in the [[List of RHPs in WI]] would solve the problem and be an improvement that works for you.  By the way, I personally really like the Google map link usage of site coordinates, i think it adds tremendously to list-articles of RHPs.  For two rather well-elaborated examples to which i contributed, see new articles [[List of RHPs in Chicago]] and [[List of octagon houses]].  I'll do some more table-adding to [[List of RHPs in WI]], then.  Let's both \"watch\" that page and discuss on its Talk page.  Cheers,  +++$+++ :Anyhow, great that creating tables in the [[List of RHPs in WI]] would solve the problem and be an improvement that works for you.  By the way, I personally really like the Google map link usage of site coordinates, i think it adds tremendously to list-articles of RHPs.  For two rather well-elaborated examples to which i contributed, see new articles [[List of RHPs in Chicago]] and [[List of octagon houses]].  I'll do some more table-adding to [[List of RHPs in WI]], then.  Let's both "watch" that page and discuss on its Talk page.  Cheers, [[User:Doncram|doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 05:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
529639 +++$+++ Doncram +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529637 +++$+++ 529638 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.215521160E09 +++$+++ By the way, would you like to join [[wp:NRHP]]?  It's been a very productive and friendly wikiproject, and it would be great if you would choose to sign up.  Many members do very much specialize in one state area, although some later find it interesting to branch out, too.  I think even those that specialize do get useful tips from monitoring or participating in the general discussion there.  Also, whether you are a member or not, you are welcome and invited to announce your new articles about NRHPs, or your additions of new photos, in the corresponding boxes at the [[wp:NRHP]] main page.  Also feel free to post questions or comments in the talk page [[wt:NRHP]].  +++$+++ ::By the way, would you like to join [[wp:NRHP]]?  It's been a very productive and friendly wikiproject, and it would be great if you would choose to sign up.  Many members do very much specialize in one state area, although some later find it interesting to branch out, too.  I think even those that specialize do get useful tips from monitoring or participating in the general discussion there.  Also, whether you are a member or not, you are welcome and invited to announce your new articles about NRHPs, or your additions of new photos, in the corresponding boxes at the [[wp:NRHP]] main page.  Also feel free to post questions or comments in the talk page [[wt:NRHP]]. [[User:Doncram|doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 05:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
529640 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529637 +++$+++ 529637 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.215514200E09 +++$+++ Forgot to sign...... <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ :Forgot to sign...... <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|27]][[User talk:JLG 2701/Sandbox|01]]</font></i></b> 03:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
529641 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529637 +++$+++ 529640 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.215518580E09 +++$+++ Vandalism is a strong word. I'd call all of their edits on the article \"non-constructive\" whether or not they are the same person. They might be new and don't know what goes on here. They don't have a good grasp on what belongs in an encyclopedia. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Vandalism is a strong word. I'd call all of their edits on the article "non-constructive" whether or not they are the same person. They might be new and don't know what goes on here. They don't have a good grasp on what belongs in an encyclopedia. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:03, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

267494 +++$+++ Pedro +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-20 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.195629660E09 +++$+++ Mattisse. Your input is valuable and I'm not asking you to change position. But I am a bit curious. I note your user boxes regarding your (impressive!) qualifications. As an admin of this project in RL I am also a director of two companies, one owned by myself and another owned by others. I have had an enormous amount of experience in the training (teaching) process in these capacities. I'd like to see some diffs on the \"Admins are notoriously unskilled in teaching\" bit if you have a moment. Ta! <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Mattisse. Your input is valuable and I'm not asking you to change position. But I am a bit curious. I note your user boxes regarding your (impressive!) qualifications. As an admin of this project in RL I am also a director of two companies, one owned by myself and another owned by others. I have had an enormous amount of experience in the training (teaching) process in these capacities. I'd like to see some diffs on the "Admins are notoriously unskilled in teaching" bit if you have a moment. Ta! <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Pedro|<b>Pedro</b>]] : [[User_talk:Pedro|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;Chat&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 23:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
267495 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267494 +++$+++ 267494 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.195632540E09 +++$+++ Look at my edit record if you want to know anything about me. Oh, you could look up [[Cyborg Ninja]] who stalked me recently, and managed to cause a lot of trouble for me on pages she had never even edited on at all, by running to admins, (like [[User:Mmarsh]] who made disparaging remarks about me  on his\/her user page based on what Cyborg Ninja said. Cyborg Ninja starting an RFC on me -- and once she was forced to remove the personal attacks about me being a mentally ill and unstable from her user page, she managed to get me blocked by starting trouble on another page she had nothing to do with, [[Caisson (Asian architecture)]], The mediator , Blueboar allowed PalaceGuard008 to  attack me endlessly in a so-called Mediation.  I will never enter a mediation again, ever. And this was after I had asked for help. Well, I got blocked by [[User:LessHeard vanU]]  suddenly, many hours after with no warning for something in a middle of a long article (which I totally lost because I was given no warning and could not save). And I had asked over and over for help. And look up [[User:IvoShandor]] (who now has exercised his right to vanish, I guess)  who drove me off DYK:Discussion with lots of support from others for giving him a compliment: See [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know\/Archive 23]]. There is no protection for me except to stay out of things and not make comments anywhere. And write my own articles.  I'm sticking to this. There are no helpful admins.    +++$+++ :Look at my edit record if you want to know anything about me. Oh, you could look up [[Cyborg Ninja]] who stalked me recently, and managed to cause a lot of trouble for me on pages she had never even edited on at all, by running to admins, (like [[User:Mmarsh]] who made disparaging remarks about me  on his/her user page based on what Cyborg Ninja said. Cyborg Ninja starting an RFC on me -- and once she was forced to remove the personal attacks about me being a mentally ill and unstable from her user page, she managed to get me blocked by starting trouble on another page she had nothing to do with, [[Caisson (Asian architecture)]], The mediator , Blueboar allowed PalaceGuard008 to  attack me endlessly in a so-called Mediation.  I will never enter a mediation again, ever. And this was after I had asked for help. Well, I got blocked by [[User:LessHeard vanU]]  suddenly, many hours after with no warning for something in a middle of a long article (which I totally lost because I was given no warning and could not save). And I had asked over and over for help. And look up [[User:IvoShandor]] (who now has exercised his right to vanish, I guess)  who drove me off DYK:Discussion with lots of support from others for giving him a compliment: See [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 23]]. There is no protection for me except to stay out of things and not make comments anywhere. And write my own articles.  I'm sticking to this. There are no helpful admins.   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 00:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
267496 +++$+++ Pedro +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267494 +++$+++ 267495 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.195632840E09 +++$+++ Oh man. That pains me. I only asked for a bit of info. If I can be of any help I'll be glad to try. I'm sorry you WP experience has been so crap. Honestly, it was just a question and I popped it here rather than at RfA to ensure no possible confrontation on the RfA itself. I'm really gutted, and please, let me prove that the admin team can help and are interested. You're a valuable thoughtful editor and we need more like you. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::Oh man. That pains me. I only asked for a bit of info. If I can be of any help I'll be glad to try. I'm sorry you WP experience has been so crap. Honestly, it was just a question and I popped it here rather than at RfA to ensure no possible confrontation on the RfA itself. I'm really gutted, and please, let me prove that the admin team can help and are interested. You're a valuable thoughtful editor and we need more like you. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Pedro|<b>Pedro</b>]] : [[User_talk:Pedro|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;Chat&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 00:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
267497 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267494 +++$+++ 267496 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.195633620E09 +++$+++ Why did [[User:LessHeard vanU]] block me? I blamed Blueboar because I did not know? That was a learning experience! LessHeard vanU will not tell me although I have asked. Is that enough of an example? Sorry, I don't feel like diffs. Just look on his user page. Doe you thing Panda 2 would be an improvement?   +++$+++ :::Why did [[User:LessHeard vanU]] block me? I blamed Blueboar because I did not know? That was a learning experience! LessHeard vanU will not tell me although I have asked. Is that enough of an example? Sorry, I don't feel like diffs. Just look on his user page. Doe you thing Panda 2 would be an improvement?  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 00:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

5352 +++$+++ Rxlxm +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5352 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.311497280E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | For the many time you have reverted vandalism on the [[MouseHunt (web game)]] article. =D  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For the many time you have reverted vandalism on the [[MouseHunt (web game)]] article. =D [[User:Rxlxm|Rxlxm]] ([[User talk:Rxlxm|talk]]) 01:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
5353 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5352 +++$+++ 5352 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311563940E09 +++$+++ Er... I only did it once. :S And I found it by checking a particular vandal's edit history after he vandalized several other more prominent pages. But thanks, heh.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Er... I only did it once. :S And I found it by checking a particular vandal's edit history after he vandalized several other more prominent pages. But thanks, heh.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 20:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

5354 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 07:37:00 +++$+++ 1.311604620E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" |For all the time you spent on improving [[Prehistoric Lepidoptera]], I present you this barnstar.  Keep up your great work!   +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" |For all the time you spent on improving [[Prehistoric Lepidoptera]], I present you this barnstar.  Keep up your great work!  [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 07:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
5355 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5354 +++$+++ 5354 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311611640E09 +++$+++ Thanks. :) Though Ruigeroeland and Kevmin and did the bulk of the work, heh. And hey, ever got the hang of IRC yet? Haven't been back there for a while. Hope KFP and the others aren't getting swamped or something.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Thanks. :) Though Ruigeroeland and Kevmin and did the bulk of the work, heh. And hey, ever got the hang of IRC yet? Haven't been back there for a while. Hope KFP and the others aren't getting swamped or something.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 09:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
5356 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5354 +++$+++ 5355 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311613440E09 +++$+++ The syntax of irc was all a bit too much for me, it seems I' m a slave of windowed systems. But outreach and community activities continue as does some GLAM work.  +++$+++ ::The syntax of irc was all a bit too much for me, it seems I' m a slave of windowed systems. But outreach and community activities continue as does some GLAM work. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 10:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

5357 +++$+++  Sharktopus +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.312008900E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | You are a teamwork titan! A collaboration conquering hero! It has been a pleasure and an honor to work with you on articles such as [[Snowmastodon site]] and [[Timema]]. Not just hard work but creative insight. Not just creative insight but hard work. You go, Obsidian! Oh yeah, come take a look at [[Paederus]] too. They are mighty cool. <font style=\"font-family:sans-serif;color:black;\"> <span style=\"text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml\">  ''''' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | You are a teamwork titan! A collaboration conquering hero! It has been a pleasure and an honor to work with you on articles such as [[Snowmastodon site]] and [[Timema]]. Not just hard work but creative insight. Not just creative insight but hard work. You go, Obsidian! Oh yeah, come take a look at [[Paederus]] too. They are mighty cool. <font style="font-family:sans-serif;color:black;"> <span style="text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml">  '''''[[User:Sharktopus|Sharktopus]]'''''</span> [[user talk: Sharktopus|<sup>talk</sup></font>]] 23:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
5358 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5357 +++$+++ 5357 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.312015860E09 +++$+++ LOL, I currently have turtles, ferns, and wildflowers on my plate (<small>edit: no, not turtle soup.<\/small>). ;D But we'll see, looks v. interesting. Thanks--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :LOL, I currently have turtles, ferns, and wildflowers on my plate (<small>edit: no, not turtle soup.</small>). ;D But we'll see, looks v. interesting. Thanks--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 01:51, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

5360 +++$+++ SunCreator +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312164120E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | A thank you for great additions to turtle articles [[Cyclemys]] and [[Philippine forest turtle]]. Regards,  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | A thank you for great additions to turtle articles [[Cyclemys]] and [[Philippine forest turtle]]. Regards, [[User:SunCreator|SunCreator]] <sup>([[User talk:SunCreator|talk]])</sup> 19:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
5361 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5360 +++$+++ 5360 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.312164420E09 +++$+++ Duuuude, you already gave me a barnstar for ''Cyclemys'' before, haha. But thanks. :) Still currently expanding ''S. leytensis''. Will eventually completely replace the problematic text currently on it.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Duuuude, you already gave me a barnstar for ''Cyclemys'' before, haha. But thanks. :) Still currently expanding ''S. leytensis''. Will eventually completely replace the problematic text currently on it.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 19:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
5362 +++$+++ SunCreator +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5360 +++$+++ 5361 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.312164840E09 +++$+++ Opps! Better twice then not at all. :) Besides the [[Philippine forest turtle]] has recently been improved. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Opps! Better twice then not at all. :) Besides the [[Philippine forest turtle]] has recently been improved. Regards, [[User:SunCreator|SunCreator]] <sup>([[User talk:SunCreator|talk]])</sup> 19:14, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

568872 +++$+++ Tvccs +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568872 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-27 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.159360800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Tvccs|Tvccs]] 05:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
568873 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568872 +++$+++ 568872 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.159395360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:YJ2kool|YJ2kool]] has now been unblocked. <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''(aeropa'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''gitica)'''</font>]]</span> 15:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

529650 +++$+++ JamieS93 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-13 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.216009260E09 +++$+++ Oh goodness, I'm so sorry about that. I must have been too hasty or not thinking straight because I actually forgot about the issue of the articles' edit histories. It might have been because the situation around me was distracting as I was editing. I'll be getting around to addressing all of the little issues with the article a bit later, by the way. I appreciate your fixing up my mistake, and thanks so much for the comments and peer review!  +++$+++ Oh goodness, I'm so sorry about that. I must have been too hasty or not thinking straight because I actually forgot about the issue of the articles' edit histories. It might have been because the situation around me was distracting as I was editing. I'll be getting around to addressing all of the little issues with the article a bit later, by the way. I appreciate your fixing up my mistake, and thanks so much for the comments and peer review! [[User:JamieS93|'''<font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size="2px" color="green">Jamie</font>''']]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/JamieS93|☆]]</sup>[[User talk:JamieS93|'''<font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size="2px" color="blue">S93</font>''']] 21:21, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
529651 +++$+++ JamieS93 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529650 +++$+++ 529650 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.216010280E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I couldn't have done it anyway, but I guess that's why I casually did a cut-and-paste. :S Anyways, I honestly welcome the nitpicking. :) The article certainly needs some help (since I don't have experience with GAs), and I appreciate critiquing. There might be some outright typos that I've missed in the midst of tweaking the article, although I hope not. Thanks again,  +++$+++ :Yeah, I couldn't have done it anyway, but I guess that's why I casually did a cut-and-paste. :S Anyways, I honestly welcome the nitpicking. :) The article certainly needs some help (since I don't have experience with GAs), and I appreciate critiquing. There might be some outright typos that I've missed in the midst of tweaking the article, although I hope not. Thanks again, [[User:JamieS93|'''<font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size="2px" color="green">Jamie</font>''']]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/JamieS93|☆]]</sup>[[User talk:JamieS93|'''<font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size="2px" color="blue">S93</font>''']] 21:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
529652 +++$+++ JamieS93 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529650 +++$+++ 529651 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.216165860E09 +++$+++ By the way, [[User:Giggy|Giggy]] left a comment about this on my talkpage. Thanks for the heads-up, though! :-)  +++$+++ ::By the way, [[User:Giggy|Giggy]] left a comment about this on my talkpage. Thanks for the heads-up, though! :-) [[User:JamieS93|'''<font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size="2px" color="green">Jamie</font>''']]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/JamieS93|☆]]</sup>[[User talk:JamieS93|'''<font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size="2px" color="blue">S93</font>''']] 16:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
529653 +++$+++ JamieS93 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529650 +++$+++ 529652 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.216174260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help with this. :D I think the review\/comments were also a good way of reminding me and getting used to what issues to look for in a potential GA. Cheers!  +++$+++ :::Thanks for your help with this. :D I think the review/comments were also a good way of reminding me and getting used to what issues to look for in a potential GA. Cheers! [[User:JamieS93|'''<font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size="2px" color="green">Jamie</font>''']]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/JamieS93|☆]]</sup>[[User talk:JamieS93|'''<font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size="2px" color="blue">S93</font>''']] 19:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

5363 +++$+++ Ushakaron +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5363 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.312169400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ushakaron|Ushakaron]] ([[User talk:Ushakaron|talk]]) 20:30, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
5364 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5363 +++$+++ 5363 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.312169580E09 +++$+++ Yeah, heh. Common mistakes for new editors really. Don't worry. You can reply in your own talk page. I watchlist every page I edit. --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Yeah, heh. Common mistakes for new editors really. Don't worry. You can reply in your own talk page. I watchlist every page I edit. --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 20:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

5366 +++$+++ Panyd +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.312269480E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 00:18, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
5367 +++$+++  Sharktopus +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5366 +++$+++ 5366 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.312270380E09 +++$+++ Hurray! Thanks for your help on this article. It looks so good, I was thinking of trying to get this one or [[Snowmastodon site]] accepted as a good article. Have you ever done that process? I have not. <font style=\"font-family:sans-serif;color:black;\"> <span style=\"text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml\">  ''''' +++$+++ * Hurray! Thanks for your help on this article. It looks so good, I was thinking of trying to get this one or [[Snowmastodon site]] accepted as a good article. Have you ever done that process? I have not. <font style="font-family:sans-serif;color:black;"> <span style="text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml">  '''''[[User:Sharktopus|Sharktopus]]'''''</span> [[user talk: Sharktopus|<sup>talk</sup></font>]] 00:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
5368 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5366 +++$+++ 5367 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.312271580E09 +++$+++ \\o\/ And thanks for inviting me to help, lol. And no, haven't ever done a GA, and honestly don't want to. It's a massive time sink, imo. It's enough that I bring articles as close as I can, then move on to another, heh.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :*\o/ And thanks for inviting me to help, lol. And no, haven't ever done a GA, and honestly don't want to. It's a massive time sink, imo. It's enough that I bring articles as close as I can, then move on to another, heh.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 00:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
5369 +++$+++  Sharktopus +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5366 +++$+++ 5367 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.312437180E09 +++$+++ I submitted it to GAN,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations#Biology_and_medicine] so let's see what happens. I didn't see a place on the nomination form to specify who worked on it, so let's keep track to make sure that you get credit too, IFF it goes anywhere at all. <font style=\"font-family:sans-serif;color:black;\"> <span style=\"text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml\">  ''''' +++$+++ ::I submitted it to GAN,[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations#Biology_and_medicine] so let's see what happens. I didn't see a place on the nomination form to specify who worked on it, so let's keep track to make sure that you get credit too, IFF it goes anywhere at all. <font style="font-family:sans-serif;color:black;"> <span style="text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml">  '''''[[User:Sharktopus|Sharktopus]]'''''</span> [[user talk: Sharktopus|<sup>talk</sup></font>]] 22:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
5370 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5366 +++$+++ 5369 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.312456560E09 +++$+++ Heh, gotcha. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :::Heh, gotcha. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 04:16, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

175657 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Brandt Luke Zorn +++$+++ 175657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.311069000E09 +++$+++ Hey, I was curious as to why you changed the plain book refs to reference templates. Given there's a consistent citation style long-established for the article, there's no need to change it per the reference guidelines, and I for one find the templates cumbersome to use.  +++$+++ Hey, I was curious as to why you changed the plain book refs to reference templates. Given there's a consistent citation style long-established for the article, there's no need to change it per the reference guidelines, and I for one find the templates cumbersome to use. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 02:50, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
175658 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Brandt Luke Zorn +++$+++ 175657 +++$+++ 175657 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311074040E09 +++$+++ I had the same thoughts on the ''Kid A'' book, which I found very chin-stroking and pretentious. Still, are you sure there is nothing of value in the book, including in regards to musical\/lyrical themes? It might be good to go over it again just to definitively rule it out as a useful source. As for the cites, the style shouldn't be changed suddenly, per [[Wikipedia:CITEVAR#Style_variation]]. Obviously you are the primary contributor to the page, but I know I definitely and Indopug most likely found the old style easier to work with whenever we needed to cite something.  +++$+++ :I had the same thoughts on the ''Kid A'' book, which I found very chin-stroking and pretentious. Still, are you sure there is nothing of value in the book, including in regards to musical/lyrical themes? It might be good to go over it again just to definitively rule it out as a useful source. As for the cites, the style shouldn't be changed suddenly, per [[Wikipedia:CITEVAR#Style_variation]]. Obviously you are the primary contributor to the page, but I know I definitely and Indopug most likely found the old style easier to work with whenever we needed to cite something. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 04:14, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
175659 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Brandt Luke Zorn +++$+++ 175657 +++$+++ 175658 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.311089760E09 +++$+++ Eh, as a reader I feel the benefits of the templates are marginal when you can just move the scrollbar slightly to see the books. As an editor I find them quite cumbersome and overly fussy to use when writing everything out is so much easier.  +++$+++ ::Eh, as a reader I feel the benefits of the templates are marginal when you can just move the scrollbar slightly to see the books. As an editor I find them quite cumbersome and overly fussy to use when writing everything out is so much easier. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 08:36, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
175660 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Brandt Luke Zorn +++$+++ 175657 +++$+++ 175658 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.311100680E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~dispenser\/cgi-bin\/webchecklinks.py?page=OK_Computer Looks like some of the links] need to be updated. Look for anything in the HTTP column that's listed as 0. The chart positions can most likely just be taken from Allmusic, although if I recall, ''Exit Music'' might have them, which would avoid the linkrot issue altogether.  +++$+++ ::[http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=OK_Computer Looks like some of the links] need to be updated. Look for anything in the HTTP column that's listed as 0. The chart positions can most likely just be taken from Allmusic, although if I recall, ''Exit Music'' might have them, which would avoid the linkrot issue altogether. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 11:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
175661 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Brandt Luke Zorn +++$+++ 175657 +++$+++ 175660 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.312048380E09 +++$+++ I suppose if you can't find a web archive version of a dead link or if said link wasn't originally a print article, it not longer exists and thus the information it's citing should be removed. If the German chart looks sketchy, go ahead and remove it. You can always ask people at the discography WikiProject for help with sources.  +++$+++ :::I suppose if you can't find a web archive version of a dead link or if said link wasn't originally a print article, it not longer exists and thus the information it's citing should be removed. If the German chart looks sketchy, go ahead and remove it. You can always ask people at the discography WikiProject for help with sources. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 10:53, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

529657 +++$+++ Carbonrodney +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-14 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.216070400E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Carbonrodney|Carbonrodney]] ([[User talk:Carbonrodney|talk]]) 14:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
529658 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529657 +++$+++ 529657 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.216119900E09 +++$+++ I don't know what you are talking about. Please give me a clue. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I don't know what you are talking about. Please give me a clue. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

5371 +++$+++ Jayron32 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.312398240E09 +++$+++ Hey, just dropping you a note that you were taken in by a troll on the help desk.  Per [[WP:DENY]], I removed the troll's question, however I also had to remove your good faith response to it.  I hope you don't mind.  It was [[User:Light current|This guy]].  -- +++$+++ Hey, just dropping you a note that you were taken in by a troll on the help desk.  Per [[WP:DENY]], I removed the troll's question, however I also had to remove your good faith response to it.  I hope you don't mind.  It was [[User:Light current|This guy]].  --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 12:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
5372 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5371 +++$+++ 5371 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.312398540E09 +++$+++ Ach! No problem though. Thanks for the note. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Ach! No problem though. Thanks for the note. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 12:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

529661 +++$+++ Meisfunny +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529661 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-16 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.216250460E09 +++$+++ I am going aroung taking a survey to see if users I know would support me in a campaign for adminship. If you could post your answer [[User:Meisfunny\/Admin#WDYT|here]] that would be great. Looking around my userpage could also help make a decision if your having trouble. Thanks! ''''' +++$+++ I am going aroung taking a survey to see if users I know would support me in a campaign for adminship. If you could post your answer [[User:Meisfunny/Admin#WDYT|here]] that would be great. Looking around my userpage could also help make a decision if your having trouble. Thanks! '''''[[User:Meisfunny|<span style="font family:Arial;color:gold">Meis</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Meisfunny|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:red">funny</span>]] [[User talk:Meisfunny|Gab]]''''' 16:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
529662 +++$+++ Meisfunny +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529661 +++$+++ 529661 +++$+++ 2008-07-20 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.216598700E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks for your reply. I have decided not to run til January or March 09 if I get a nomination, but could you maybe post helpfuil links on becoming an admin on my talk page? Thanks! ''''' +++$+++ :Okay, thanks for your reply. I have decided not to run til January or March 09 if I get a nomination, but could you maybe post helpfuil links on becoming an admin on my talk page? Thanks! '''''[[User:Meisfunny|<span style="font family:Arial;color:gold">Meis</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Meisfunny|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:red">funny</span>]] [[User talk:Meisfunny|Gab]]''''' 17:05, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
529663 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529661 +++$+++ 529662 +++$+++ 2008-07-20 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.216613220E09 +++$+++ That's a sensible plan and even that might be too early. I don't have any links on becoming an admin. You need to make yourself so valuable and well-rounded that people will ask you to become an admin. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::That's a sensible plan and even that might be too early. I don't have any links on becoming an admin. You need to make yourself so valuable and well-rounded that people will ask you to become an admin. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 21:07, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
529664 +++$+++ Meisfunny +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529661 +++$+++ 529663 +++$+++ 2008-07-23 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.216878600E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I found a few anyway. Maybe I'll wait 'til next summer then. However I did get a compromise of that in getting rollback rights. ''''' +++$+++ :::Thanks, I found a few anyway. Maybe I'll wait 'til next summer then. However I did get a compromise of that in getting rollback rights. '''''[[User:Meisfunny|<span style="font family:Arial;color:gold">Meis</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Meisfunny|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:red">funny</span>]] [[User talk:Meisfunny|Gab]]''''' 22:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

5375 +++$+++ Kevmin +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.312433040E09 +++$+++ Great to see your wonderful expansion of the giant cicada's article up on the dyk.. section!-- +++$+++ Great to see your wonderful expansion of the giant cicada's article up on the dyk.. section!--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 21:44, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
5376 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5375 +++$+++ 5375 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.312457160E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :) And thanks for the [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File%3A%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B0%2C_120_%D0%BC%D0%BB%D0%BD._%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82.jpeg&action=historysubmit&diff=56315669&oldid=38685893 correct ID] on its main pic, heh. Honestly it was the one thing that made me actually want to create an article on it.--&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Thanks! :) And thanks for the [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3A%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B0%2C_120_%D0%BC%D0%BB%D0%BD._%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82.jpeg&action=historysubmit&diff=56315669&oldid=38685893 correct ID] on its main pic, heh. Honestly it was the one thing that made me actually want to create an article on it.--&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 04:26, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

5377 +++$+++ Reaper Eternal +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.312509120E09 +++$+++ I emailed [[WP:OS|oversight]] to have those edits suppressed, and in the meantime, I revdel'ed them to prevent them from being seen by anybody other than admins. I actually edit-conflicted with you in removing the information. No wonder his account got hijacked....  +++$+++ I emailed [[WP:OS|oversight]] to have those edits suppressed, and in the meantime, I revdel'ed them to prevent them from being seen by anybody other than admins. I actually edit-conflicted with you in removing the information. No wonder his account got hijacked.... [[User:Reaper Eternal|Reaper Eternal]] ([[User talk:Reaper Eternal|talk]]) 18:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
5378 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5377 +++$+++ 5377 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.312509420E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Her*, but yeah. Sheesh. Still it should've been easy to get it back if she still has her email. I think she's just a wee bit too technologically challenged, imo. :\/ --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Thanks. Her*, but yeah. Sheesh. Still it should've been easy to get it back if she still has her email. I think she's just a wee bit too technologically challenged, imo. :/ --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 18:57, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

529666 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-20 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.216611540E09 +++$+++ Hi! lately I had been changing some terminology concerning the towns of Wisconsin. Some users had been saying that a village cannot be located within a town- that they are surrounded by a town. I am trying to keep this terminology uniformed for the political subdivisions of Wisconsin.Otherwise, we would have to make a massive change with all the articles about Wisconsin towns, etc. Also I questioned the accuracy of saying an village is surrounded by a town instead of saying an village is located within a town or is partially located in 2 different towns.Thanks- +++$+++ Hi! lately I had been changing some terminology concerning the towns of Wisconsin. Some users had been saying that a village cannot be located within a town- that they are surrounded by a town. I am trying to keep this terminology uniformed for the political subdivisions of Wisconsin.Otherwise, we would have to make a massive change with all the articles about Wisconsin towns, etc. Also I questioned the accuracy of saying an village is surrounded by a town instead of saying an village is located within a town or is partially located in 2 different towns.Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 20:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
529667 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529666 +++$+++ 529666 +++$+++ 2008-07-20 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.216613580E09 +++$+++ That's a silly reason for an argument\/discussion: it's just looking at the same thing 2 different ways. It's hard to come up with a uniform way to say it because sometimes a village\/city is located completely within a town, sometimes it is on the border of two towns, and other times it is between 2+ villages\/cities, etc. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :That's a silly reason for an argument/discussion: it's just looking at the same thing 2 different ways. It's hard to come up with a uniform way to say it because sometimes a village/city is located completely within a town, sometimes it is on the border of two towns, and other times it is between 2+ villages/cities, etc. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 21:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
529668 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529666 +++$+++ 529667 +++$+++ 2008-07-20 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.216615140E09 +++$+++ Thanks- I will just dropped it> You are right it was silly.I will not revert any changes. Thanks- +++$+++ ::Thanks- I will just dropped it> You are right it was silly.I will not revert any changes. Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 21:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
529669 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529666 +++$+++ 529668 +++$+++ 2008-07-20 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.216615620E09 +++$+++ They also are silly for wanting to change it for no reason. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::They also are silly for wanting to change it for no reason. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 21:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

5379 +++$+++ Nameisnotimportant +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5379 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.312537020E09 +++$+++ Your thoughtful response is highly appreciated. Thanks. Hope I bump into more editors\/admins like you.  +++$+++ Your thoughtful response is highly appreciated. Thanks. Hope I bump into more editors/admins like you. [[User:Nameisnotimportant|Nameisnotimportant]] ([[User talk:Nameisnotimportant|talk]]) 02:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
5380 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5379 +++$+++ 5379 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.312567260E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 11:01, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

267524 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267524 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-28 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.196252820E09 +++$+++ I've done some work on the [[RockAmerica]] article. I hope you'll see your way to removing the notability template. +++$+++ I've done some work on the [[RockAmerica]] article. I hope you'll see your way to removing the notability template.[[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup|talk]]) 04:27, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
267525 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267524 +++$+++ 267524 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.196292960E09 +++$+++ O.K. I did remove it. The article is much improved.   +++$+++ :O.K. I did remove it. The article is much improved.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 15:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
267526 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267524 +++$+++ 267525 +++$+++ 2007-11-29 09:01:00 +++$+++ 1.196355660E09 +++$+++ Very good. Thanks.  +++$+++ :: Very good. Thanks. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup|talk]]) 09:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

5381 +++$+++ Someone35 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.312579620E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | thanks for helping me with customizing my signature!!! <span style=\"background-color: #75ab00; border:1.5px solid #872900; font-family:Segoe Print; font-size:80%;\">  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | thanks for helping me with customizing my signature!!! <span style="background-color: #75ab00; border:1.5px solid #872900; font-family:Segoe Print; font-size:80%;"> [[User:Someone35|<font color="#f2ffd5">Someone35</font>]] [[User talk:Someone35|<font color="#f2ffd5">(talk)</font>]] </span> 14:27, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
5382 +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ Obsidian Soul +++$+++ 5381 +++$+++ 5381 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312579920E09 +++$+++ Nice sig! :D Thanks and you're welcome. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style=\"font-family:century gothic\"> +++$+++ :Nice sig! :D Thanks and you're welcome. :) --&nbsp;'''<span style="font-family:century gothic">[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#000">Obsidi<span style="color:#c5c9d2">♠</span>n</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:#c5c9d2">Soul</span>]]</span>''' 14:32, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

529671 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-20 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.216619280E09 +++$+++ Also Butte des Morts, Wisconsin is anoother article I started. My apologies I forgot my name +++$+++ Also Butte des Morts, Wisconsin is anoother article I started. My apologies I forgot my name[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 22:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
529672 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529671 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.216750140E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for adding the photos to the Waukau, Wisconsin article. I also started articles on Paoli & Basco, Wisconsin. One quick note: would you please look at the [[Wonewoc, Wisconsin]] article? One of the editors took out the demographic\/geographic sections- and they needed to be put back in without reversing the later revisions. Also I came acrosse an article about [[Glidden, Wisconsin]]- an editor made Glidden a city but it is an unincorpotaed community in Ashland County, Wisconsin. I check the Ashland County government and Glidden was not listed as a municipality of the county.Thanks- +++$+++ ::Many thanks for adding the photos to the Waukau, Wisconsin article. I also started articles on Paoli & Basco, Wisconsin. One quick note: would you please look at the [[Wonewoc, Wisconsin]] article? One of the editors took out the demographic/geographic sections- and they needed to be put back in without reversing the later revisions. Also I came acrosse an article about [[Glidden, Wisconsin]]- an editor made Glidden a city but it is an unincorpotaed community in Ashland County, Wisconsin. I check the Ashland County government and Glidden was not listed as a municipality of the county.Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 11:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
529673 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529671 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-24 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.216924380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for fixing the Wonewoc, Wisconsin article. I also started an article about the [[Mindoro Cut]] in [[La Crosse County, Wisconsin]]. The Mindoro Cut is one of the main landmarks in western Wisconsin. Thanks-  +++$+++ :: Thanks for fixing the Wonewoc, Wisconsin article. I also started an article about the [[Mindoro Cut]] in [[La Crosse County, Wisconsin]]. The Mindoro Cut is one of the main landmarks in western Wisconsin. Thanks- [[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 11:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

5384 +++$+++ Oxymoron83 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5384 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-12 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.200209400E09 +++$+++ Hello Bookworm, probably you wanted to create your archive at [[User_talk:Bookworm857158367\/Archive 1]]. Regards -- +++$+++ Hello Bookworm, probably you wanted to create your archive at [[User_talk:Bookworm857158367/Archive 1]]. Regards --[[User:Oxymoron83|Oxymoron]]<sup>[[User_talk:Oxymoron83|83]]</sup> 23:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
5385 +++$+++ Oxymoron83 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5384 +++$+++ 5384 +++$+++ 2008-01-12 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.200210120E09 +++$+++ Do you want me to delete your now created archive, so that you are able to move [[Talk:Bookworm857158367\/Archive 1]] there, this will preserves the page history at the proper place? Regards -- +++$+++ :Do you want me to delete your now created archive, so that you are able to move [[Talk:Bookworm857158367/Archive 1]] there, this will preserves the page history at the proper place? Regards --[[User:Oxymoron83|Oxymoron]]<sup>[[User_talk:Oxymoron83|83]]</sup> 23:42, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
5386 +++$+++ Oxymoron83 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5384 +++$+++ 5385 +++$+++ 2008-01-13 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.200215340E09 +++$+++ Done, I think it's now how you wanted it in the first place :) -- +++$+++ ::Done, I think it's now how you wanted it in the first place :) --[[User:Oxymoron83|Oxymoron]]<sup>[[User_talk:Oxymoron83|83]]</sup> 01:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

568876 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568876 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-27 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.159411860E09 +++$+++ Thanks! -- +++$+++ Thanks! --[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="color:red">'''Nish'''</span><span style="color:blue">'''kid'''</span><span style="color:green">'''64'''</span>]] 19:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
568877 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568876 +++$+++ 568876 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.159412040E09 +++$+++ Now is the time to take a break from admin duties! Regards, <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Now is the time to take a break from admin duties! Regards, <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''(aeropa'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''gitica)'''</font>]]</span> 19:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
568878 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568876 +++$+++ 568877 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.159412640E09 +++$+++ No break! CSD G7, blanked by creator, so tagged. Nishkid is still green - and you're doing fine. Cheers. - <b> +++$+++ ::No break! CSD G7, blanked by creator, so tagged. Nishkid is still green - and you're doing fine. Cheers. - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|CrazyRussian]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|talk]]/[[Special:Emailuser/Crzrussian|email]]</small> 20:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
568879 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568876 +++$+++ 568876 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.159416120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the vote of confidence! We're all still learning, doing this job. <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for the vote of confidence! We're all still learning, doing this job. <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''(aeropa'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''gitica)'''</font>]]</span> 21:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

529674 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-21 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.216626060E09 +++$+++ Also....I asked for a pic of Justin Allgaier on Flikr, let's see how my luck holds. <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ Also....I asked for a pic of Justin Allgaier on Flikr, let's see how my luck holds. <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|27]][[User talk:JLG 2701/Sandbox|01]]</font></i></b> 00:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
529675 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529674 +++$+++ 529674 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.216681560E09 +++$+++ I guess I had it right before I changed it.  The history that didn't get moved was [[Modified racing]], originally found at [[User:JLG 2701\/Sandbox]].  If you can't move it, could you ask another admin to move it?  You don't have to delete my sandbox though.  Thanks!!! <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ :I guess I had it right before I changed it.  The history that didn't get moved was [[Modified racing]], originally found at [[User:JLG 2701/Sandbox]].  If you can't move it, could you ask another admin to move it?  You don't have to delete my sandbox though.  Thanks!!! <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|27]][[User talk:JLG 2701/Sandbox|01]]</font></i></b> 16:06, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
529676 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529674 +++$+++ 529675 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.216703580E09 +++$+++ I got it done. It went better than I expected. I moved your sandbox because I needed its edit history. I replaced what was there with a generic blank sandbox. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I got it done. It went better than I expected. I moved your sandbox because I needed its edit history. I replaced what was there with a generic blank sandbox. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 22:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

5388 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-29 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.201648500E09 +++$+++ It made it in. See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know&diff=187637069&oldid=187562593 this edit]. I suppose you're on one of the US time zones, so it probably was added and replaced while you were asleep (it has happened to me, too).  +++$+++ It made it in. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know&diff=187637069&oldid=187562593 this edit]. I suppose you're on one of the US time zones, so it probably was added and replaced while you were asleep (it has happened to me, too). [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 15:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
5389 +++$+++ J. Van Meter +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5388 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-29 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.201653060E09 +++$+++ actually, i don't think that's the case - if it were, those articles would all be appearing in the DYK archive by now, and they're not.  +++$+++ :*actually, i don't think that's the case - if it were, those articles would all be appearing in the DYK archive by now, and they're not. [[User:J. Van Meter|J. Van Meter]] ([[User talk:J. Van Meter|talk]]) 16:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
5390 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5388 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-29 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.201659000E09 +++$+++ I might have forgotten to add them to the archive, then. Will do.  +++$+++ ::*I might have forgotten to add them to the archive, then. Will do. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 18:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
5391 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5388 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-29 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.201659660E09 +++$+++ Done. The update after me was done by another admin who probably didn't realize the hooks hadn't been archived (this is done manually, not automatically). So, believe me, they were on the main page all right (you can review the history at [[T:DYK]]), just during the early morning hours US time.  +++$+++ :::*Done. The update after me was done by another admin who probably didn't realize the hooks hadn't been archived (this is done manually, not automatically). So, believe me, they were on the main page all right (you can review the history at [[T:DYK]]), just during the early morning hours US time. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 18:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

529677 +++$+++ Bedford +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529677 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-22 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.216743480E09 +++$+++ On the July 15th submissions for DYK, [[James Cameron (activist)]] seemed to me like an idea for next year's April Fools Day hooks.  Someone said to contact you about it, so that's what I'm doing.  If you don't want to save it, I think I might go ahead and use it.-- +++$+++ On the July 15th submissions for DYK, [[James Cameron (activist)]] seemed to me like an idea for next year's April Fools Day hooks.  Someone said to contact you about it, so that's what I'm doing.  If you don't want to save it, I think I might go ahead and use it.--[[User:Bedford|<font color="black">'''Bedford'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Bedford|<font color="pink">Pray</font>]]</sup> 09:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
529678 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529677 +++$+++ 529677 +++$+++ 2008-07-24 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.216893540E09 +++$+++ I forgot to mark that I was on a 2 day vacation on my user page. It's a day late and a dollar short! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I forgot to mark that I was on a 2 day vacation on my user page. It's a day late and a dollar short! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

529679 +++$+++ WisconsinCheeze +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-22 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.216772580E09 +++$+++ Do you think this important road in the Dells should have its own page. Right now it redirects to U.S. Route 12 in Wisconsin.  +++$+++ Do you think this important road in the Dells should have its own page. Right now it redirects to U.S. Route 12 in Wisconsin. [[User:WisconsinCheeze|WisconsinCheeze]] ([[User talk:WisconsinCheeze|talk]]) 17:23, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
529680 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529679 +++$+++ 529679 +++$+++ 2008-07-24 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.216894620E09 +++$+++ I'd say yes. You should be able to find multiple independent resources that talk specifically about this major hub. U.S. Route 12 is a very poor redirect as it is one of the many state and U.S. highways that make up the parkway. I did take pictures of it, and there's at least one in the Wisconsin Dells article. Let me know if you have more needs, and I'll see what I have. What is the exact route of the Parkway? '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I'd say yes. You should be able to find multiple independent resources that talk specifically about this major hub. U.S. Route 12 is a very poor redirect as it is one of the many state and U.S. highways that make up the parkway. I did take pictures of it, and there's at least one in the Wisconsin Dells article. Let me know if you have more needs, and I'll see what I have. What is the exact route of the Parkway? '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

529681 +++$+++ J.delanoy +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-27 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.217215500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="green">J'''.'''delanoy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<font color="blue"><sub>adds</sub></font>]] 20:25, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
529682 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529681 +++$+++ 529681 +++$+++ 2008-07-30 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.217469960E09 +++$+++ I'll respond on your talk page and let's hold the rest of the discussion there. I rarely get responses back in situations like this. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I'll respond on your talk page and let's hold the rest of the discussion there. I rarely get responses back in situations like this. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 19:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

5394 +++$+++ Finneganw +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5394 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-23 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.201129320E09 +++$+++ It would appear that the preliminary report of 22 January 2008 is based on credible scientific analysis of the remains of Alexis and Anastasia\/Marie. I would suggest that this information remain undisturbed until the release of the final details later this year. I hope you will respect this. Already there has been an attempt by some person to remove such details. They need to realise removing verified information is not acceptable. I hope you will support this whatever your feelings may be on Anna Anderson.  +++$+++ It would appear that the preliminary report of 22 January 2008 is based on credible scientific analysis of the remains of Alexis and Anastasia/Marie. I would suggest that this information remain undisturbed until the release of the final details later this year. I hope you will respect this. Already there has been an attempt by some person to remove such details. They need to realise removing verified information is not acceptable. I hope you will support this whatever your feelings may be on Anna Anderson. [[User:Finneganw|Finneganw]] 15:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
5395 +++$+++ Veritas +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5394 +++$+++ 5394 +++$+++ 2008-01-23 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.201129740E09 +++$+++ I came here to thank you, Bookworm, for your revised edits to the preliminary report which are actually verifiable.  Just to address the point made above, the portion I was attempting to delete was a violation of [[WP:NOT#CRYSTALBALL]] section 3, dealing with future history, because the section included speculation as to the meaning of the results. -- +++$+++ :I came here to thank you, Bookworm, for your revised edits to the preliminary report which are actually verifiable.  Just to address the point made above, the portion I was attempting to delete was a violation of [[WP:NOT#CRYSTALBALL]] section 3, dealing with future history, because the section included speculation as to the meaning of the results. --[[User:Veritas|Veritas]] ([[User talk:Veritas|talk]]) 15:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

529684 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-02 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.217718960E09 +++$+++ Hi! I hope your summer is going well. Is it possible to bring the town of Hartford, Washington County, Wisconsin back? I assumed it go redirected to the Hartford, Wisconsin article in 2005 or so. The town of Hartford has its own website: [http:\/\/www.townofhartford.com]. The Hartford, Wisconsin article may have to be redone as a result. This is getting discouraging. People like to edit the various Wisconsin towns article because they are there and that most people would not pay too much attention. My apologies to you and anyone else for any problems concerning the Wisconsin towns merger issues. Please let me know so I can put a Washington County template on the article. Thank you- +++$+++ Hi! I hope your summer is going well. Is it possible to bring the town of Hartford, Washington County, Wisconsin back? I assumed it go redirected to the Hartford, Wisconsin article in 2005 or so. The town of Hartford has its own website: [http://www.townofhartford.com]. The Hartford, Wisconsin article may have to be redone as a result. This is getting discouraging. People like to edit the various Wisconsin towns article because they are there and that most people would not pay too much attention. My apologies to you and anyone else for any problems concerning the Wisconsin towns merger issues. Please let me know so I can put a Washington County template on the article. Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 16:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
529685 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529684 +++$+++ 529684 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.217763000E09 +++$+++ My summer is going well, except I still can't find a job after looking hard for the past year. That's been real frustrating, especially considering I did so well at [[Fox Valley Technical College|FVTC]] and I have on-the-job experience in IT from most of the 1990s. I had a lot of fun going to the various racetracks in the eastern half of Wisconsin! I grabbed some pictures of Registered Historic Places en route. I undid the \"merge\" (which actually never happened) by reverting the article before the redirect and text changes which confused others. You definitely do not owe my an apology about the town mergers issues. Discussing things is part of being a Wikipedian! I added the town to the county template, added its official website and moved it to the current naming system([[Hartford (town), Wisconsin]]), so hopefully everything should be done. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :My summer is going well, except I still can't find a job after looking hard for the past year. That's been real frustrating, especially considering I did so well at [[Fox Valley Technical College|FVTC]] and I have on-the-job experience in IT from most of the 1990s. I had a lot of fun going to the various racetracks in the eastern half of Wisconsin! I grabbed some pictures of Registered Historic Places en route. I undid the "merge" (which actually never happened) by reverting the article before the redirect and text changes which confused others. You definitely do not owe my an apology about the town mergers issues. Discussing things is part of being a Wikipedian! I added the town to the county template, added its official website and moved it to the current naming system([[Hartford (town), Wisconsin]]), so hopefully everything should be done. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

5397 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-28 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.201557240E09 +++$+++ Hey. If I go and update the main page, would you be able to handle the credits? I don't have time to do both today. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hey. If I go and update the main page, would you be able to handle the credits? I don't have time to do both today. Thanks, [[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#060">'''''Wizardman'''''</span>]] 13:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
5398 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5397 +++$+++ 5397 +++$+++ 2008-01-28 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.201561200E09 +++$+++ Alright, update's been done. Thanks for helping out.  +++$+++ :Alright, update's been done. Thanks for helping out. [[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#060">'''''Wizardman'''''</span>]] 15:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
5399 +++$+++ Victuallers +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5397 +++$+++ 5397 +++$+++ 2008-01-28 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.201588920E09 +++$+++ Wow you were quick ... I was trying to help but you got there first  +++$+++ :Wow you were quick ... I was trying to help but you got there first [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 22:42, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

267544 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-12 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.197509100E09 +++$+++ Hi FayssaIff. Please look at the question I asked you on your ArbCom nomination page.  I was very hurt and troubled by you cavalier treatment of me, almost as a joke, on the AN\/I page. I believe I have contributed enormously to wikipedia and do not deserved to be dismissed as a joke. I am an all too easy target because I am vulnerable. It is greatly disturbing to think that a person with your attitude toward someone like me would be on the ARBCom. You do seem  not look into things before you rush to hurtful judgments. It is immensely discouraging to good editors as I am. Please look at my edit numbers, my FA article copyedits, the numbers of articles I have written and\/or significantly contributed to. My DYK's are to numerous to count, although I have lost heart now to do serious work on Wikipedia.  Sincerely,   +++$+++ Hi FayssaIff. Please look at the question I asked you on your ArbCom nomination page.  I was very hurt and troubled by you cavalier treatment of me, almost as a joke, on the AN/I page. I believe I have contributed enormously to wikipedia and do not deserved to be dismissed as a joke. I am an all too easy target because I am vulnerable. It is greatly disturbing to think that a person with your attitude toward someone like me would be on the ARBCom. You do seem  not look into things before you rush to hurtful judgments. It is immensely discouraging to good editors as I am. Please look at my edit numbers, my FA article copyedits, the numbers of articles I have written and/or significantly contributed to. My DYK's are to numerous to count, although I have lost heart now to do serious work on Wikipedia.  Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267545 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267544 +++$+++ 267544 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.197513420E09 +++$+++ P.S. \"Restricted to People w\/ Civil Tantrum only\" is more a joke than anything. Even if it would be something serious i, of course, don't consider you part of that :) --  +++$+++ :P.S. "Restricted to People w/ Civil Tantrum only" is more a joke than anything. Even if it would be something serious i, of course, don't consider you part of that :) -- [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up''® </sup></font>]]</small> 18:37, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267546 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267544 +++$+++ 267545 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.197514140E09 +++$+++ I never posted or even knew about AN\/I for the first six months I was here. Yes, I am an old lady that does not catch on quickly but that is no reason to ridicule me. My contributions have been excellent until now. I now refuse most work asked and no longer copy edit for people -- I only did that so I would be protected from the sock puppets. I copy edited the India FA and it was for that reason I was protected much of the time. You do a lot of damage by your cavalier attitude. Maybe Jimbo does not value the contributions of us older members -- I believe that is clearly the message. I voted against you for this reason. I no longer care if I am blocked. I have freaked out and put a month's worth of my articles up for deletion (and other shoot-self-in-foot tactics) but I have never edit warred knowingly, I have never been uncivil. I have never vandalized but only put my very best into wikipedia. Unfortunately all the good editors I knew have gone. It's you wikipedia. Go at it.   +++$+++ ::I never posted or even knew about AN/I for the first six months I was here. Yes, I am an old lady that does not catch on quickly but that is no reason to ridicule me. My contributions have been excellent until now. I now refuse most work asked and no longer copy edit for people -- I only did that so I would be protected from the sock puppets. I copy edited the India FA and it was for that reason I was protected much of the time. You do a lot of damage by your cavalier attitude. Maybe Jimbo does not value the contributions of us older members -- I believe that is clearly the message. I voted against you for this reason. I no longer care if I am blocked. I have freaked out and put a month's worth of my articles up for deletion (and other shoot-self-in-foot tactics) but I have never edit warred knowingly, I have never been uncivil. I have never vandalized but only put my very best into wikipedia. Unfortunately all the good editors I knew have gone. It's you wikipedia. Go at it.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267547 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267544 +++$+++ 267546 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.197514860E09 +++$+++ Mattisse. I again feel sorry about the way you feel. But can you understand my position? Yes, you have been uncivil toward Blueboar. The thing is again about emotions since i know about your invaluable contributions. Now that i understand your feeling, can you please have a look at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2007\/Candidate_statements\/FayssalF\/Questions_for_the_candidate#Questions_from_Heimsternmy |my stance]] toward incivility? Make sure you read my answer to Heimstern #2 and to avoid thinking it is directed to you. --  +++$+++ :::Mattisse. I again feel sorry about the way you feel. But can you understand my position? Yes, you have been uncivil toward Blueboar. The thing is again about emotions since i know about your invaluable contributions. Now that i understand your feeling, can you please have a look at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2007/Candidate_statements/FayssalF/Questions_for_the_candidate#Questions_from_Heimsternmy |my stance]] toward incivility? Make sure you read my answer to Heimstern #2 and to avoid thinking it is directed to you. -- [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up''® </sup></font>]]</small> 19:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267548 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267544 +++$+++ 267544 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.197515640E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict)  ::I might have been with BlueBoar. I had misgivings in accepting him as a mediator because of past experience. I actually saved him from a sockpuppet. However, he let an incredibly agressive person run all over me in a mediation -- a person who had taken material out of an article I wrote, redirected the article to his and then cut\/paste the material I wrote into his. That person never contributed any material to the mediation. All he did was attack me constantly and at length and they were personal attacks. Blueboar said not a word to him until the very end when I blew up. Then he made a mild comment to the other party.  I came up with outlines, list of materials, a schedule of how to procede - in other word I did all the work. Until I could not take both doing the work and the constant abuse anymore. There is no one for a person like me to turn to -- no one helps or protects me. Only one person is left from the excellent group of editors I used to work with on wikipedia and he will only communicate on IRC now. Why do you hang on Blueboar and don't look at the months of abuse I took with no help. I get your drift and will not bother you any more. You are for the BlueBoars and Zerapera (or whatever her name is) of the world. This is why I, like many others, no longer give of myself to wikipedia. Wikipedia does not value me and has made that very clear.    +++$+++ *(edit conflict)  ::I might have been with BlueBoar. I had misgivings in accepting him as a mediator because of past experience. I actually saved him from a sockpuppet. However, he let an incredibly agressive person run all over me in a mediation -- a person who had taken material out of an article I wrote, redirected the article to his and then cut/paste the material I wrote into his. That person never contributed any material to the mediation. All he did was attack me constantly and at length and they were personal attacks. Blueboar said not a word to him until the very end when I blew up. Then he made a mild comment to the other party.  I came up with outlines, list of materials, a schedule of how to procede - in other word I did all the work. Until I could not take both doing the work and the constant abuse anymore. There is no one for a person like me to turn to -- no one helps or protects me. Only one person is left from the excellent group of editors I used to work with on wikipedia and he will only communicate on IRC now. Why do you hang on Blueboar and don't look at the months of abuse I took with no help. I get your drift and will not bother you any more. You are for the BlueBoars and Zerapera (or whatever her name is) of the world. This is why I, like many others, no longer give of myself to wikipedia. Wikipedia does not value me and has made that very clear.   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267549 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267544 +++$+++ 267548 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.197516060E09 +++$+++ P.S. Do you think I would have put up with that situation with Blueboar if I had any other choice? I did ask on AN\/I if an article could be eviscerated and #REDIRECT with no consultation with article editors. Answer:no. The redirecting editor must discuss. But there was '''no way for me to enforce that''', no one would help me,  so I had to go along with Blueboar's directions of  accepting the #REDIRECT and then fixing up the other editor's article to be as good as the one he had #REDIRECT and merged into his. How would you feel in a situation like that?  I am helpless here at wikipedia and I cannot take it any longer.    +++$+++ ::P.S. Do you think I would have put up with that situation with Blueboar if I had any other choice? I did ask on AN/I if an article could be eviscerated and #REDIRECT with no consultation with article editors. Answer:no. The redirecting editor must discuss. But there was '''no way for me to enforce that''', no one would help me,  so I had to go along with Blueboar's directions of  accepting the #REDIRECT and then fixing up the other editor's article to be as good as the one he had #REDIRECT and merged into his. How would you feel in a situation like that?  I am helpless here at wikipedia and I cannot take it any longer.   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267550 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267544 +++$+++ 267549 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.197516600E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Poinsettia pant 784.jpg|thumb|100px]]Mattisse, please take heart and don't be discouraged. I am really swamped today, fell behind yesterday on Wiki editing I must tend to, and have appt's all afternoon today, but I promise to catch up later in the day.  I understand your frustration, as it mirrors much of my Wiki experience as well. Something must change if productive editors are to stay on Wiki.   +++$+++ :::[[Image:Poinsettia pant 784.jpg|thumb|100px]]Mattisse, please take heart and don't be discouraged. I am really swamped today, fell behind yesterday on Wiki editing I must tend to, and have appt's all afternoon today, but I promise to catch up later in the day.  I understand your frustration, as it mirrors much of my Wiki experience as well. Something must change if productive editors are to stay on Wiki.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267551 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267544 +++$+++ 267550 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.197516780E09 +++$+++ Oh Sandy, I don't blame you for anything. You are the only person I respect besides [[User:Salix alba]]. This is just a sick place.  +++$+++ ::::Oh Sandy, I don't blame you for anything. You are the only person I respect besides [[User:Salix alba]]. This is just a sick place. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

506464 +++$+++ Dthomsen8 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.296124080E09 +++$+++ \"| assessment =\" mean, as I have not found them in use. I am also puzzled that Maine does not seem to be a project with a category for assessment tables. Maybe the tools people will tell me. -- +++$+++ "| assessment =" mean, as I have not found them in use. I am also puzzled that Maine does not seem to be a project with a category for assessment tables. Maybe the tools people will tell me. --[[User:Dthomsen8|DThomsen8]] ([[User talk:Dthomsen8|talk]]) 02:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
506465 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506464 +++$+++ 506464 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.296124920E09 +++$+++ Im sorry I don't know what the goals is either other than as a yes or no to say the project has them and maybe for the assessments = would mean they have the quality assessment categories and functionality on their banners. Thats just a guess though. As far as the Maine question some of the state projects and several of the other US related projects do not have assessment carteories but I thought maine did. If you look at the Embassy page @ [[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States]] all the US related projects are listed (that doesn't mean that they fall under WPUS just a list of whats out there), their status and a link to the Assessment tables. Not sure if that will help but maybe it will. -- +++$+++ :Im sorry I don't know what the goals is either other than as a yes or no to say the project has them and maybe for the assessments = would mean they have the quality assessment categories and functionality on their banners. Thats just a guess though. As far as the Maine question some of the state projects and several of the other US related projects do not have assessment carteories but I thought maine did. If you look at the Embassy page @ [[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States]] all the US related projects are listed (that doesn't mean that they fall under WPUS just a list of whats out there), their status and a link to the Assessment tables. Not sure if that will help but maybe it will. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 02:42, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
506466 +++$+++ Dthomsen8 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506464 +++$+++ 506465 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.296270660E09 +++$+++ Out of an abundance of caution, I did not add an infobox to Wikiproject Kansas, but instead [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kansas]] provides the infobox on their talk page for their consideration. They have a very \"busy\" project page, and I am unsure how an infobox could fit in. Nebraska is a different story. See [[WP:NEB].-- +++$+++ ::Out of an abundance of caution, I did not add an infobox to Wikiproject Kansas, but instead [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kansas]] provides the infobox on their talk page for their consideration. They have a very "busy" project page, and I am unsure how an infobox could fit in. Nebraska is a different story. See [[WP:NEB].--[[User:Dthomsen8|DThomsen8]] ([[User talk:Dthomsen8|talk]]) 19:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
506467 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506464 +++$+++ 506466 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.296271140E09 +++$+++ Yeah there are a few active ones out there. WPUS is another one thats pretty busy but I was trying to see a way to work it in. New York, Wisonsin and Oregon are pretty active as well so you might want to drop it on their talk pages first as well if you haven't implemented them yet. -- +++$+++ :::Yeah there are a few active ones out there. WPUS is another one thats pretty busy but I was trying to see a way to work it in. New York, Wisonsin and Oregon are pretty active as well so you might want to drop it on their talk pages first as well if you haven't implemented them yet. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 19:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

5407 +++$+++  +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-23 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.203767520E09 +++$+++ are you deleting some dyk candidates from the list? [[Special:Contributions\/Editorofthewiki|Editor]] +++$+++ are you deleting some dyk candidates from the list? [[Special:Contributions/Editorofthewiki|Editor]][[User:Editorofthewiki|of]][[User talk:Editorofthewiki|the]][[Special:Random|wiki]] 03:52, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
5408 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5407 +++$+++ 5407 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.203768180E09 +++$+++ Edit summaries would probably clear up this confusion.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Edit summaries would probably clear up this confusion.  —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:Wknight94|talk]]) 04:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

267553 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267553 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-12 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.197525780E09 +++$+++ I'm still working on it.  I'm not particularly invested in it, but to me the word 'psychopathy' is also very outmoded, stigmatizing even more than is necessary, and politically incorrect.  I can't be the only one to think these people using the word 'psychopath' in a clinical context is not quite right.  If we can find a source that says so (shouldn't be too hard) that'd be great.  +++$+++ I'm still working on it.  I'm not particularly invested in it, but to me the word 'psychopathy' is also very outmoded, stigmatizing even more than is necessary, and politically incorrect.  I can't be the only one to think these people using the word 'psychopath' in a clinical context is not quite right.  If we can find a source that says so (shouldn't be too hard) that'd be great. [[User:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="red">Me</font><font color="orange">rk</font><font color="yellow">i</font><font color="green">n</font><font color="blue">s</font><font color="indigo">m</font><font color="violet">um</font></b>]] 22:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267554 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267553 +++$+++ 267553 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.197527520E09 +++$+++ What are you thinking?    +++$+++ :What are you thinking?   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 22:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267555 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267553 +++$+++ 267554 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.197527040E09 +++$+++ If its of any help I came across [http:\/\/www.hull.ac.uk\/php\/pislm\/ppp05.pdf Psychopathy in Psychiatry and Philosophy: An Annotated Bibliography]. From that it seems there are quite a few current publications which still use the term, although I don't know how many of these are clinical. -- +++$+++ ::If its of any help I came across [http://www.hull.ac.uk/php/pislm/ppp05.pdf Psychopathy in Psychiatry and Philosophy: An Annotated Bibliography]. From that it seems there are quite a few current publications which still use the term, although I don't know how many of these are clinical. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 22:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267556 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267553 +++$+++ 267555 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.197527520E09 +++$+++ Thanks! It is used frequently in research because of Hare, a research psychologist - he must be in his 80's by now! He is the one using cluster\/factor analyses on sample of 16 subjects. There is quite a bit of research going on in that vein. But he is off on a completely different angle and his findings are irrelevant to clinical psychology. Don't you have that 16-PF over where you are?  He wants to come up with something like that.  Thanks for the conversation yesterday!    +++$+++ :::Thanks! It is used frequently in research because of Hare, a research psychologist - he must be in his 80's by now! He is the one using cluster/factor analyses on sample of 16 subjects. There is quite a bit of research going on in that vein. But he is off on a completely different angle and his findings are irrelevant to clinical psychology. Don't you have that 16-PF over where you are?  He wants to come up with something like that.  Thanks for the conversation yesterday!   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 22:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267557 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267553 +++$+++ 267556 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.197527940E09 +++$+++ By the way, that person got blocked for a month, so thanks for straightening out my pathetic attempt to report!!  +++$+++ ::::By the way, that person got blocked for a month, so thanks for straightening out my pathetic attempt to report!! [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 22:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

5411 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-25 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.203982140E09 +++$+++ What exactly made you think that an article about an Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic saint, with a reference provided, is not notable? -- +++$+++ What exactly made you think that an article about an Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic saint, with a reference provided, is not notable? --[[User:Bookworm857158367|Bookworm857158367]] ([[User talk:Bookworm857158367|talk]]) 15:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
5412 +++$+++ Excirial +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5411 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.203983280E09 +++$+++ This is what i would like to call a border borderline case. Personally i doubt that the [[WP:BIO]] criteria are met, since the references provided for this article are not exactly [[WP:NPOV|Neutral]]. Then again, i merely tagging pages for CSD, by which rationale its better to tag one page extra, then one page to little. In fact, i got to admit that i was interested in what the action of the reviewing administrator would be, as i know of no specific ruling for these cases(If a tag is rejected, the history always sites what rules apply).    +++$+++ :* This is what i would like to call a border borderline case. Personally i doubt that the [[WP:BIO]] criteria are met, since the references provided for this article are not exactly [[WP:NPOV|Neutral]]. Then again, i merely tagging pages for CSD, by which rationale its better to tag one page extra, then one page to little. In fact, i got to admit that i was interested in what the action of the reviewing administrator would be, as i know of no specific ruling for these cases(If a tag is rejected, the history always sites what rules apply).   [[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Talk</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup> 15:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
5413 +++$+++ Excirial +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5411 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.203983580E09 +++$+++ After Re-Reading the article, i removed the speedy tag. There is simply no way this is warranted in its current form. Sorry for the trouble!  +++$+++ ::* After Re-Reading the article, i removed the speedy tag. There is simply no way this is warranted in its current form. Sorry for the trouble! [[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Talk</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup> 15:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

525190 +++$+++ Miller17CU94 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525190 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-07 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.168232460E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the edit on the {{tl|Food chemistry}}. As the creator of this template, it looks good! Much appreciated.  +++$+++ Thank you for the edit on the {{tl|Food chemistry}}. As the creator of this template, it looks good! Much appreciated. [[User:Miller17CU94|Chris]] 21:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
525191 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525190 +++$+++ 525190 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.168240440E09 +++$+++ Happy to help. -- +++$+++ :Happy to help. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

267558 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-12 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.197528840E09 +++$+++ [[User:Merkinsmum|<b><font color=\"red\">Me<\/font><font color=\"orange\">rk<\/font><font color=\"yellow\">i<\/font><font color=\"green\">n<\/font><font color=\"blue\">s<\/font><font color=\"indigo\">m<\/font><font color=\"violet\">um<\/font><\/b>]], in looking at the ICD-10 online:  http:\/\/counsellingresource.com\/distress\/personality-disorders\/antisocial.html - the Dissocial is vaguer and does not have the criminal element. Also, look at the reference Salix just sent me -- you can tell by the dates what is happening. Cleckley was writing in the 1940's.   +++$+++ [[User:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="red">Me</font><font color="orange">rk</font><font color="yellow">i</font><font color="green">n</font><font color="blue">s</font><font color="indigo">m</font><font color="violet">um</font></b>]], in looking at the ICD-10 online:  http://counsellingresource.com/distress/personality-disorders/antisocial.html - the Dissocial is vaguer and does not have the criminal element. Also, look at the reference Salix just sent me -- you can tell by the dates what is happening. Cleckley was writing in the 1940's.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 22:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267559 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267558 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.197530760E09 +++$+++ Hi I like to think I've NPOV'ed the article a bit more just now, so do take a look.  Yes we can call people a 'psycho' etc in everyday life if we think they're a bit wrong, but that's not really the same as institutionalised use of the term.  Use of the term feels a bit like if the psychiatric establishment still believed in [[drapetomania]] lol, although APD and psychopathy are not so different, indeed many believe are synonymous.  The charming\/manipulative\/lying elements don't seem to be in the APD article much at the mo, with which I was surprised.  Hare and his followers can't have been the only ones to talk about the possible advantages in business etc of being a psycho, too.  Tomorrow I'll look at the dissocial link (tonight I've had a glass or two of wine lol).  Yes the bits I've read about APD before (being from the UK, I think were different.   But maybe I'm just getting it mixed up with [[NPD]] a bit at that point. +++$+++ ::Hi I like to think I've NPOV'ed the article a bit more just now, so do take a look.  Yes we can call people a 'psycho' etc in everyday life if we think they're a bit wrong, but that's not really the same as institutionalised use of the term.  Use of the term feels a bit like if the psychiatric establishment still believed in [[drapetomania]] lol, although APD and psychopathy are not so different, indeed many believe are synonymous.  The charming/manipulative/lying elements don't seem to be in the APD article much at the mo, with which I was surprised.  Hare and his followers can't have been the only ones to talk about the possible advantages in business etc of being a psycho, too.  Tomorrow I'll look at the dissocial link (tonight I've had a glass or two of wine lol).  Yes the bits I've read about APD before (being from the UK, I think were different.   But maybe I'm just getting it mixed up with [[NPD]] a bit at that point.[[User:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="red">Me</font><font color="orange">rk</font><font color="yellow">i</font><font color="green">n</font><font color="blue">s</font><font color="indigo">m</font><font color="violet">um</font></b>]] 23:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267560 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267558 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.197531000E09 +++$+++ P.S. Glad you like the sig lol- I was inspired a bit by yours because you have colour and bold- plus I saw some code on another site for the rainbowness so I could copy it.  At first it was flashing and larger, but I got told off:)  Spoilsports lol.:)  +++$+++ ::P.S. Glad you like the sig lol- I was inspired a bit by yours because you have colour and bold- plus I saw some code on another site for the rainbowness so I could copy it.  At first it was flashing and larger, but I got told off:)  Spoilsports lol.:) [[User:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="red">Me</font><font color="orange">rk</font><font color="yellow">i</font><font color="green">n</font><font color="blue">s</font><font color="indigo">m</font><font color="violet">um</font></b>]] 23:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
267561 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267558 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.197531300E09 +++$+++ I would say you went a few steps further than I did! Does make it easier to find yourself on the page, doesn't it?   +++$+++ :::I would say you went a few steps further than I did! Does make it easier to find yourself on the page, doesn't it?  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 23:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

437809 +++$+++ STBotI +++$+++ Evadb +++$+++ 437809 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-08 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.199832420E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. [[User:STBotI|STBotI]] ([[User talk:STBotI|talk]]) 14:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
437810 +++$+++ Cahk +++$+++ Evadb +++$+++ 437809 +++$+++ 437809 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.200417480E09 +++$+++ If you take a look at [[Venerable_Order_of_Saint_John#The_Order_in_the_United_Kingdom]], you will see the order have 6 grades. With the exception of Esq that is not used in Canada, [[Queen Elizabeth II]] can appoint anyone(citizen or PR of Canada) to any grade of the order.<Ref>[http:\/\/www.sja.ca\/?cid=7c14cf5e657246c9a2d5b58d15b097ccContentCategory&order=1&mainContent=31e2d0c401fc4687b214d5cff364214dContentCategory Membership]<\/ref> The reason that we don't have Bailiff or Dame Grand Cross is because the Governor General and [[Lieutenant-Governor (Canada)|Lieutenant-governors]] are only appointed to Knights or Dames of Justice and as the Chancellor of the order, thus no one can be appointed a level beyond what the GG\/LGs have even though theoretically it can be done on the advice of the GG. <ref>[http:\/\/www.orderofstjohn.org\/appointments\/priories\/can_ap.htm Priory of Canada]<\/ref>-- +++$+++ :If you take a look at [[Venerable_Order_of_Saint_John#The_Order_in_the_United_Kingdom]], you will see the order have 6 grades. With the exception of Esq that is not used in Canada, [[Queen Elizabeth II]] can appoint anyone(citizen or PR of Canada) to any grade of the order.<Ref>[http://www.sja.ca/?cid=7c14cf5e657246c9a2d5b58d15b097ccContentCategory&order=1&mainContent=31e2d0c401fc4687b214d5cff364214dContentCategory Membership]</ref> The reason that we don't have Bailiff or Dame Grand Cross is because the Governor General and [[Lieutenant-Governor (Canada)|Lieutenant-governors]] are only appointed to Knights or Dames of Justice and as the Chancellor of the order, thus no one can be appointed a level beyond what the GG/LGs have even though theoretically it can be done on the advice of the GG. <ref>[http://www.orderofstjohn.org/appointments/priories/can_ap.htm Priory of Canada]</ref>--[[User:Cahk|Cahk]] ([[User talk:Cahk|talk]]) 09:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

5418 +++$+++ Midnightdreary +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-02 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.207170120E09 +++$+++ Could you explain why \"The Children's Hour\" is so important that you deem it necessary to include it in the lede? As the lede is supposed to sum up the article, the article should mention this poem to merit inclusion in the lede. It does not... I'd also suggest that three works cover enough ground in that opening paragraph and, it seems to me, the ''most'' well-known works are the best option. I'm having a hard time seeing why you want to push for it so much and I don't want to be involved with an edit war, so I figured I'd ask. Thanks! -- +++$+++ Could you explain why "The Children's Hour" is so important that you deem it necessary to include it in the lede? As the lede is supposed to sum up the article, the article should mention this poem to merit inclusion in the lede. It does not... I'd also suggest that three works cover enough ground in that opening paragraph and, it seems to me, the ''most'' well-known works are the best option. I'm having a hard time seeing why you want to push for it so much and I don't want to be involved with an edit war, so I figured I'd ask. Thanks! --[[User:Midnightdreary|Midnightdreary]] ([[User talk:Midnightdreary|talk]]) 14:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
5419 +++$+++ Midnightdreary +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5418 +++$+++ 5418 +++$+++ 2008-04-02 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.207179060E09 +++$+++ You'll excuse my bias as I'm not familiar with the poem (and I'm sorta protective of the article because it took substantial work to get it to GA status). Might I recommend we find a way to mention it specifically in the body of the article? Even if not in the lede, it does seem to merit some kind of mention in the article. -- +++$+++ :You'll excuse my bias as I'm not familiar with the poem (and I'm sorta protective of the article because it took substantial work to get it to GA status). Might I recommend we find a way to mention it specifically in the body of the article? Even if not in the lede, it does seem to merit some kind of mention in the article. --[[User:Midnightdreary|Midnightdreary]] ([[User talk:Midnightdreary|talk]]) 16:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
5420 +++$+++ Midnightdreary +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5418 +++$+++ 5419 +++$+++ 2008-04-02 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.207189980E09 +++$+++ I for one tend to think of \"[[The Skeleton in Armor]]\" pretty quickly when I think of Longfellow. But, maybe our exposure to him has changed over generations? To answer your question, I currently wear neither of those hats! -- +++$+++ ::I for one tend to think of "[[The Skeleton in Armor]]" pretty quickly when I think of Longfellow. But, maybe our exposure to him has changed over generations? To answer your question, I currently wear neither of those hats! --[[User:Midnightdreary|Midnightdreary]] ([[User talk:Midnightdreary|talk]]) 19:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

267564 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-13 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.197536520E09 +++$+++ I wanted to merge ''sections'' of it, such as get the history bit and other bits because it's a more fleshed out article.  See the sections I've highlighted for merging on [[Hare's theory of psychopathy]].  I have to mention it, at least in the edit if it's done, so the history is intact for it to comply with the GFDL.  What do you think?  That article is in less of a note form than the APD one.  I mean the criteria bit needs to be a list but the rest of APD could look more like an article.  +++$+++ I wanted to merge ''sections'' of it, such as get the history bit and other bits because it's a more fleshed out article.  See the sections I've highlighted for merging on [[Hare's theory of psychopathy]].  I have to mention it, at least in the edit if it's done, so the history is intact for it to comply with the GFDL.  What do you think?  That article is in less of a note form than the APD one.  I mean the criteria bit needs to be a list but the rest of APD could look more like an article. [[User:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="red">Me</font><font color="orange">rk</font><font color="yellow">i</font><font color="green">n</font><font color="blue">s</font><font color="indigo">m</font><font color="violet">um</font></b>]] 01:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
267565 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267564 +++$+++ 267564 +++$+++ 2007-12-13 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.197537000E09 +++$+++ I am not understanding what you mean \"comply with the GFDL\". What does that entail? (I am working on the Antisocial Personality Disorder using DSM-IV. I discovered the other DSM diagnosis articles do not have that ICD-10 or 9  on them, so I don't have to mix apples and oranges.)    +++$+++ :I am not understanding what you mean "comply with the GFDL". What does that entail? (I am working on the Antisocial Personality Disorder using DSM-IV. I discovered the other DSM diagnosis articles do not have that ICD-10 or 9  on them, so I don't have to mix apples and oranges.)   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 01:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

267566 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ December 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ December 2007 (UTC)
267567 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267566 +++$+++ 267566 +++$+++ 2007-12-13 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.197541260E09 +++$+++ Actually, if you want to do a merge, you can. But from my point of view the info could be left where it is. It is just general information. I have all the books and references and could write a section like that for the Antisocial Personality Disorder article, although I don't think it is needed there.   Sleep well!   +++$+++ :Actually, if you want to do a merge, you can. But from my point of view the info could be left where it is. It is just general information. I have all the books and references and could write a section like that for the Antisocial Personality Disorder article, although I don't think it is needed there.   Sleep well!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 02:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

5423 +++$+++ SusanLesch +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5423 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-05 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.207441740E09 +++$+++ Hi, Bookworm857158367, you know I love this article, always have. Sadly I don't think [[Allegra Byron]] was eligible for DYK because it would have had to be a five-fold expansion. I'll leave a note at DYK or main page. - +++$+++ Hi, Bookworm857158367, you know I love this article, always have. Sadly I don't think [[Allegra Byron]] was eligible for DYK because it would have had to be a five-fold expansion. I'll leave a note at DYK or main page. -[[User:Susanlesch|Susanlesch]] ([[User talk:Susanlesch|talk]]) 17:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
5424 +++$+++ SusanLesch +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5423 +++$+++ 5423 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.207449420E09 +++$+++ We're okay! Somebody at DYK goofed; only one other person noticed afterwards. Good luck to you on your articles. I still remember from WikiProject Biography. - +++$+++ :We're okay! Somebody at DYK goofed; only one other person noticed afterwards. Good luck to you on your articles. I still remember from WikiProject Biography. -[[User:Susanlesch|Susanlesch]] ([[User talk:Susanlesch|talk]]) 19:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

267568 +++$+++ NeantHumain +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-13 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.197542160E09 +++$+++ I strongly encourage both you and Zeraeph to take a cooling-off period before making further edits to these articles.-- +++$+++ I strongly encourage both you and Zeraeph to take a cooling-off period before making further edits to these articles.--[[User:NeantHumain|NeantHumain]] ([[User talk:NeantHumain|talk]]) 02:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
267569 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267568 +++$+++ 267568 +++$+++ 2007-12-13 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.197542700E09 +++$+++ I agree with most of what you say, as I have written in the talk sections of the articles. I suggested perhaps three articles and clearly define the terms. Please read what I wrote, as you are repeating much of what I said. I am not editing the Psychopathy article. However, I think it is in very bad shape. I am trying to clean up the Antisocial Personality Disorder article. As someone said, recently, there is a very good reason why hardly any Psychology articles can even reach GA status. I have resisted editing this articles as this is my profession. I mainly write forensic articles, as I am a forensic psychologist. But this confusion over terms and the mess these articles are in is a travesty. I would like to work with you to fix them up. It is an embarrassment the way they are now. The other person, the one fixated on sex offenders being Antisocial Personality Disorders, has been blocked for 28 days. But the article is such a mess, it ruins the concept for me -- and psychopathy was my Life Work! I hope you will help. Regards,  +++$+++ :I agree with most of what you say, as I have written in the talk sections of the articles. I suggested perhaps three articles and clearly define the terms. Please read what I wrote, as you are repeating much of what I said. I am not editing the Psychopathy article. However, I think it is in very bad shape. I am trying to clean up the Antisocial Personality Disorder article. As someone said, recently, there is a very good reason why hardly any Psychology articles can even reach GA status. I have resisted editing this articles as this is my profession. I mainly write forensic articles, as I am a forensic psychologist. But this confusion over terms and the mess these articles are in is a travesty. I would like to work with you to fix them up. It is an embarrassment the way they are now. The other person, the one fixated on sex offenders being Antisocial Personality Disorders, has been blocked for 28 days. But the article is such a mess, it ruins the concept for me -- and psychopathy was my Life Work! I hope you will help. Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 02:45, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

394120 +++$+++ John254 +++$+++ Daven200520 +++$+++ 394120 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.187574600E09 +++$+++ Please note that the placement of a block notice does not cause a user to be blocked; blocks must be effectuated by [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]]. Non-administrators may request that users engaging in vandalism be blocked at [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism]].  +++$+++ Please note that the placement of a block notice does not cause a user to be blocked; blocks must be effectuated by [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]]. Non-administrators may request that users engaging in vandalism be blocked at [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism]]. [[User:John254|John254]] 18:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
394121 +++$+++ John254 +++$+++ Daven200520 +++$+++ 394120 +++$+++ 394120 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.187576460E09 +++$+++ At the moment, I am not a sysop.  +++$+++ :At the moment, I am not a sysop. [[User:John254|John254]] 19:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
394122 +++$+++ Radiant! +++$+++ Daven200520 +++$+++ 394120 +++$+++ 394120 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.187882940E09 +++$+++ Whoa! You should definitely not take John's word for it, Daven, because he's massively ''over''stating what it takes to become a sysop (admin is the common term, actually). Basically all it takes is that you show some dedication to the project, and show that we can trust your judgment. For dedication, pick your own area, it really doesn't matter. For judgment, it may actually ''help'' if you were engaged in a dispute, because this tells us how you deal with disputes. One that starts screaming and insulting people in a dispute is not a good admin; one who deals with it level-headedly and resolves it somehow likely is. It really isn't such a big deal.  +++$+++ *Whoa! You should definitely not take John's word for it, Daven, because he's massively ''over''stating what it takes to become a sysop (admin is the common term, actually). Basically all it takes is that you show some dedication to the project, and show that we can trust your judgment. For dedication, pick your own area, it really doesn't matter. For judgment, it may actually ''help'' if you were engaged in a dispute, because this tells us how you deal with disputes. One that starts screaming and insulting people in a dispute is not a good admin; one who deals with it level-headedly and resolves it somehow likely is. It really isn't such a big deal. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#0000DD">&gt;<font color="#0066FF">R<font color="#0099FF">a<font color="#00CCFF">d<font color="#00EEFF">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 08:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

5426 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-15 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.208244480E09 +++$+++ \"Acknowledged\" by who? Certainly not by him, nor by most historians, i would have thought. Like the early medieval Scottish King nicknamed the Black, a great pile of speculation has been loaded onto a nickname.  +++$+++ "Acknowledged" by who? Certainly not by him, nor by most historians, i would have thought. Like the early medieval Scottish King nicknamed the Black, a great pile of speculation has been loaded onto a nickname. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 00:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
5427 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5426 +++$+++ 5426 +++$+++ 2008-04-15 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.208247120E09 +++$+++ No doubt i will some time - there is one, maybe more, modern historian who has taken the nickname\/gossip seiously, and a whole pile of black studies and other writers who have followed up on him, but I don't think most specialist Renaissance historians are very convinced. The portraits are supposed to be prime evidence, and they aren't terribly convincing, are they?  +++$+++ :No doubt i will some time - there is one, maybe more, modern historian who has taken the nickname/gossip seiously, and a whole pile of black studies and other writers who have followed up on him, but I don't think most specialist Renaissance historians are very convinced. The portraits are supposed to be prime evidence, and they aren't terribly convincing, are they? [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 01:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
5428 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5426 +++$+++ 5427 +++$+++ 2008-04-15 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.208248440E09 +++$+++ Well, this guy (quoted by an opponent on one of your refs) certainly is an art historian:\"In the only reference to the Duke's color in the entire 173-page catalogue of the Philadelphia exhibit, Karl Strehlke, the curator and organizer writes, \"Some scholars have claimed that Alessandro's mother was a North African slave. This cannot be confirmed, however, and the text of a letter that she wrote to her son in 1529 suggests that she was an Italian peasant from Lazio.\" \" It is misleading to treat the matter as generally accepted.  +++$+++ ::Well, this guy (quoted by an opponent on one of your refs) certainly is an art historian:"In the only reference to the Duke's color in the entire 173-page catalogue of the Philadelphia exhibit, Karl Strehlke, the curator and organizer writes, "Some scholars have claimed that Alessandro's mother was a North African slave. This cannot be confirmed, however, and the text of a letter that she wrote to her son in 1529 suggests that she was an Italian peasant from Lazio." " It is misleading to treat the matter as generally accepted. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 01:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
5429 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5426 +++$+++ 5428 +++$+++ 2008-04-15 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.208248860E09 +++$+++ I've copied it all to the article talk page.  +++$+++ :::I've copied it all to the article talk page. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 01:41, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
5430 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5426 +++$+++ 5429 +++$+++ 2008-04-15 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.208249340E09 +++$+++ I'm happy as it is for now, & may research it more some time later. Thanks for the change! Of course [[Moors|Moorish]] opens a whole new load of issues itself.... [[Ludovico Sforza]] \"il Moro\" is another of these.  +++$+++ ::::I'm happy as it is for now, & may research it more some time later. Thanks for the change! Of course [[Moors|Moorish]] opens a whole new load of issues itself.... [[Ludovico Sforza]] "il Moro" is another of these. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 01:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

529715 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529715 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-16 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.218911340E09 +++$+++ One of the editors who is new started an article about [[School Hill, Wisconsin]]. The title in the article was originally Schoolhill but accordingly to the DeLorme Wisconsin Gazetter&Atlas, the correct spelling is:School Hill, Wisconsin, so I changed it. The editor tried to add a photo but had some problems. I wanted to alert you since this from Manitowoc County.Thanks- +++$+++ One of the editors who is new started an article about [[School Hill, Wisconsin]]. The title in the article was originally Schoolhill but accordingly to the DeLorme Wisconsin Gazetter&Atlas, the correct spelling is:School Hill, Wisconsin, so I changed it. The editor tried to add a photo but had some problems. I wanted to alert you since this from Manitowoc County.Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 11:29, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
529716 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529715 +++$+++ 529715 +++$+++ 2008-08-16 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.218919920E09 +++$+++ I am quite familiar with School Hill. I probably have pictures or can get some. I drove through the School Hill to get pictures of town hall (offhand I think it's located in Eaton, Manitowoc County, Wisconsin) at the east end of the community. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I am quite familiar with School Hill. I probably have pictures or can get some. I drove through the School Hill to get pictures of town hall (offhand I think it's located in Eaton, Manitowoc County, Wisconsin) at the east end of the community. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
529717 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529715 +++$+++ 529716 +++$+++ 2008-08-16 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.218921720E09 +++$+++ Many thanks-for your comment- According to my helpful DeLorme Wisconsin atlas-School Hill is in the town of Meeme. The town of Eaton is just north in and around St. Nazianz according to the atlas.Many thanks as always- +++$+++ ::Many thanks-for your comment- According to my helpful DeLorme Wisconsin atlas-School Hill is in the town of Meeme. The town of Eaton is just north in and around St. Nazianz according to the atlas.Many thanks as always-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

87471 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-29 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.288414620E09 +++$+++ I can't believe he deserves the category \"statistician\" at that level of employment. \"Data analyst\" might be closer, but I still think it requires a source to raise him to such an academic level. I did 1\/3 stats for my Masters, but I wouldn't call myself a statistician.  +++$+++ I can't believe he deserves the category "statistician" at that level of employment. "Data analyst" might be closer, but I still think it requires a source to raise him to such an academic level. I did 1/3 stats for my Masters, but I wouldn't call myself a statistician. [[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 21:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
87472 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87471 +++$+++ 87471 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.288459620E09 +++$+++ In the cold light of morning I think you were correct not to take that categorisation seriously; I thought i heard Sugar himself describe his job as 'statistician' on last night's [[The Graham Norton Show]] (from 10:00) but listening to it again he in fact said \"I was in the statistics department there, I ''thought I'd be'' a statistician\". Which sounds like he changed careers before he reached the point a point at which he would in fact have called himself one. I may have failed to respect [[WP:MASTODON#Drink minimal amounts of alcohol|one point in my favourite Wikipedia essay]].  +++$+++ :In the cold light of morning I think you were correct not to take that categorisation seriously; I thought i heard Sugar himself describe his job as 'statistician' on last night's [[The Graham Norton Show]] (from 10:00) but listening to it again he in fact said "I was in the statistics department there, I ''thought I'd be'' a statistician". Which sounds like he changed careers before he reached the point a point at which he would in fact have called himself one. I may have failed to respect [[WP:MASTODON#Drink minimal amounts of alcohol|one point in my favourite Wikipedia essay]]. [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 10:27, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
87473 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87471 +++$+++ 87471 +++$+++ 2010-11-07 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.289191620E09 +++$+++ Dear Lseidlein, I did not propose or nominate this article for deletion, nor did I participate in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/N = 1 fallacy|the deletion debate]]. If you wish to challenge the decision to delete it, the appropriate procedure is explained at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]]. Personally I would call the issue a [[unit of analysis]] error. A [http:\/\/scholar.google.co.uk\/scholar?q=%22unit+of+analysis+error%22 Google Scholar search] appears to indicate that this is a more commonly used term in medicine than 'pseudoreplication'. It appears the term 'unit of analysis error' was coined in [http:\/\/journals.lww.com\/lww-medicalcare\/Fulltext\/1984\/12000\/Choosing_the_Correct_Unit_of_Analysis_in_Medical.5.aspx this 1984 paper], the same year as 'pseudoreplication'.  I would suggest it may be more useful to Wikipedia's readers to add material on this term, either to the article on [[pseudoreplication]] on in its own article, rather than under the term 'N=1 fallacy' which appears to be a much more recent coinage that is far less commonly used. Regards,  +++$+++ :Dear Lseidlein, I did not propose or nominate this article for deletion, nor did I participate in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N = 1 fallacy|the deletion debate]]. If you wish to challenge the decision to delete it, the appropriate procedure is explained at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]]. Personally I would call the issue a [[unit of analysis]] error. A [http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22unit+of+analysis+error%22 Google Scholar search] appears to indicate that this is a more commonly used term in medicine than 'pseudoreplication'. It appears the term 'unit of analysis error' was coined in [http://journals.lww.com/lww-medicalcare/Fulltext/1984/12000/Choosing_the_Correct_Unit_of_Analysis_in_Medical.5.aspx this 1984 paper], the same year as 'pseudoreplication'.  I would suggest it may be more useful to Wikipedia's readers to add material on this term, either to the article on [[pseudoreplication]] on in its own article, rather than under the term 'N=1 fallacy' which appears to be a much more recent coinage that is far less commonly used. Regards, [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 20:47, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

267575 +++$+++ Archtransit +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-18 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.197969120E09 +++$+++ I saw your nice article about the Supreme Court case.  I often pick out DYK hooks.  Consider a supreme court infobox in the article.  +++$+++ I saw your nice article about the Supreme Court case.  I often pick out DYK hooks.  Consider a supreme court infobox in the article. [[User:Archtransit|Archtransit]] ([[User talk:Archtransit|talk]]) 01:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
267576 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267575 +++$+++ 267575 +++$+++ 2007-12-18 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.197969300E09 +++$+++ O.K. I don't know how to do it but probably I can figure it out. Thanks!   +++$+++ :O.K. I don't know how to do it but probably I can figure it out. Thanks!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 01:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

267578 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-18 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.198044480E09 +++$+++ OMFG!  If that's really true then that may explain why he ended up on the 'psychopathy' page, may have been looking at my contribs, as I undid an edit of IPSOS's just before he was blocked, the edit I undid was on [[Jaq D. Hawkins]]]. +++$+++ OMFG!  If that's really true then that may explain why he ended up on the 'psychopathy' page, may have been looking at my contribs, as I undid an edit of IPSOS's just before he was blocked, the edit I undid was on [[Jaq D. Hawkins]]].[[User:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="orange">Merkinsmum</font></b>]] 22:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
267579 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267578 +++$+++ 267578 +++$+++ 2007-12-18 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.198045140E09 +++$+++ Yes. It's really a messed up nest. [[User:Blnguyen]] was the one who tracked down the original bunch. Ekajaki had claimed at one point she was a bar maid in Dublin, and at another point she and two other socks claimed they were driving to Austin, TX in the same car, sharing a laptop and editing the same articles. Blnguyen said, \"Oh, on your way to your bar maid job?\" All this came out of the Starwood Arbitration. Blnguyen is very smart. I'm glad he is keeping his eye on this as apparently it is starting up again.   +++$+++ :Yes. It's really a messed up nest. [[User:Blnguyen]] was the one who tracked down the original bunch. Ekajaki had claimed at one point she was a bar maid in Dublin, and at another point she and two other socks claimed they were driving to Austin, TX in the same car, sharing a laptop and editing the same articles. Blnguyen said, "Oh, on your way to your bar maid job?" All this came out of the Starwood Arbitration. Blnguyen is very smart. I'm glad he is keeping his eye on this as apparently it is starting up again.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 22:19, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

88287 +++$+++ Bob Palin +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-04-25 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.082878860E09 +++$+++ Just for my information - do people in metric countries really refer to the \"16 metre box\"?  +++$+++ Just for my information - do people in metric countries really refer to the "16 metre box"? [[User:Bob Palin|Bob Palin]] 00:41, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
88288 +++$+++ Shallot +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88287 +++$+++ 88287 +++$+++ 2004-04-25 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.082918880E09 +++$+++ Well, yeah, though I'm not sure about English per se. I inserted it there mainly to make sure we're not preferring imperial units, but I'm sure people are generally aware that it's a sixteen meter box even if they don't use a compound term. -- +++$+++ : Well, yeah, though I'm not sure about English per se. I inserted it there mainly to make sure we're not preferring imperial units, but I'm sure people are generally aware that it's a sixteen meter box even if they don't use a compound term. --[[User:Shallot|Shallot]] 11:48, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)

267581 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-17 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.197948060E09 +++$+++ Hmm? I'll keep it short. I've seen you round alot recently, and I've come to admire your straight-talking, very helpful edits around en.wiki. Would you be willing to accept a nomination from a user who you've probably never contacted before? I'd love to, and I'd be really grateful for the opportunity. You'll most probably not accept this, but I'd like to think it represents anonymous confidence. :) Regards,  +++$+++ Hmm? I'll keep it short. I've seen you round alot recently, and I've come to admire your straight-talking, very helpful edits around en.wiki. Would you be willing to accept a nomination from a user who you've probably never contacted before? I'd love to, and I'd be really grateful for the opportunity. You'll most probably not accept this, but I'd like to think it represents anonymous confidence. :) Regards, [[User:Rudget|<span style="color:#171788;font-weight:bold">Rt</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Rudget|.]] 19:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
267582 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267581 +++$+++ 267581 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.197959580E09 +++$+++ I am truly appreciative of your kind words and thank you for taking the time to contact me. Perhaps you do not know that I am a controversial person here on wikipedia. In fact, I believe it is only because of [[User:Salix alba]]'s kindness to me that I am even able to continue here. He is currently running for admin [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Salix alba]] and it is part of his kindness that he mentions me and my various situations in a positive sense in his statement, which is a new feeling for me and it feels good! Perhaps between you and him I will one day have the confidence to do what you are suggesting. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :I am truly appreciative of your kind words and thank you for taking the time to contact me. Perhaps you do not know that I am a controversial person here on wikipedia. In fact, I believe it is only because of [[User:Salix alba]]'s kindness to me that I am even able to continue here. He is currently running for admin [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Salix alba]] and it is part of his kindness that he mentions me and my various situations in a positive sense in his statement, which is a new feeling for me and it feels good! Perhaps between you and him I will one day have the confidence to do what you are suggesting. Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 22:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
267583 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267581 +++$+++ 267582 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.198207800E09 +++$+++ I do hope so. Regards,  +++$+++ ::I do hope so. Regards, [[User:Rudget|<span style="color:#171788;font-weight:bold">Rt</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Rudget|.]] 19:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
267584 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267581 +++$+++ 267583 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.198208940E09 +++$+++ Again, I thank you as it does wonders for my morale! Thanks!   +++$+++ :::Again, I thank you as it does wonders for my morale! Thanks!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
267585 +++$+++ JzG +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267581 +++$+++ 267584 +++$+++ 2007-12-18 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.198011720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for mentioning this, I have supported Salix Alba's RfA.  As you say, one of the good people. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]<\/b> <small>( +++$+++ :::: Thanks for mentioning this, I have supported Salix Alba's RfA.  As you say, one of the good people. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 13:02, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

5439 +++$+++ Hammer Raccoon +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-05 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.210011840E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.  <small>Do you want to [[Template:Bots#Message notification opt out|opt out]] of receiving this notice?<\/small><!-- Template:PRODWarning -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.  <small>Do you want to [[Template:Bots#Message notification opt out|opt out]] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Hammer Raccoon|Hammer Raccoon]] ([[User talk:Hammer Raccoon|talk]]) 11:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
5440 +++$+++ Hammer Raccoon +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5439 +++$+++ 5439 +++$+++ 2008-05-05 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.210017540E09 +++$+++ There is one reference, which does not imply notability. In my view, the fact that more people are calling their children Aidan, or something that sounds like Aidan, is not deserving of an encyclopaedia article. As you objected to the prod, I shall take this to AFD.  +++$+++ :There is one reference, which does not imply notability. In my view, the fact that more people are calling their children Aidan, or something that sounds like Aidan, is not deserving of an encyclopaedia article. As you objected to the prod, I shall take this to AFD. [[User:Hammer Raccoon|Hammer Raccoon]] ([[User talk:Hammer Raccoon|talk]]) 12:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
5441 +++$+++ Hammer Raccoon +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5439 +++$+++ 5440 +++$+++ 2008-05-05 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.210024740E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry you object to the AFD, but I'm not the only who has seen fit to delete this before, and I think a community discussion is the best way to settle this.  +++$+++ ::I'm sorry you object to the AFD, but I'm not the only who has seen fit to delete this before, and I think a community discussion is the best way to settle this. [[User:Hammer Raccoon|Hammer Raccoon]] ([[User talk:Hammer Raccoon|talk]]) 14:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
5442 +++$+++ Hammer Raccoon +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5439 +++$+++ 5441 +++$+++ 2008-05-05 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.210036020E09 +++$+++ All further discussion would probably best be carried out  over at the AFD.  +++$+++ :::All further discussion would probably best be carried out  over at the AFD. [[User:Hammer Raccoon|Hammer Raccoon]] ([[User talk:Hammer Raccoon|talk]]) 18:07, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

481504 +++$+++ I'll bring the food +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ 481504 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-08 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.155082740E09 +++$+++ This article uses original research in the reference to Brightman hitting a note with a link to youtube. Does Brightman have to hit an E6 ''by role''? If the role calls for the note, please find the sheet music, and verify the text by sourcing the ref with the page with the note showing her hitting it. And the ISBN etc of the sheet book.-- +++$+++ This article uses original research in the reference to Brightman hitting a note with a link to youtube. Does Brightman have to hit an E6 ''by role''? If the role calls for the note, please find the sheet music, and verify the text by sourcing the ref with the page with the note showing her hitting it. And the ISBN etc of the sheet book.--[[User:I'll bring the food|I&#39;ll bring the food]] 17:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
481505 +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ 481504 +++$+++ 481504 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.155083100E09 +++$+++ But anyway, the role was written for her, she was the original performer, and it specifically calls for an E6. (I think this is actually specified in audition information for Phantom, but I'd have to find old issues of Backstage magazine to make sure.) I do have a copy of the official Phantom of the Opera songbook with sheet music, and that note is specified. The book wouldn't have pictures of her singing the note since that song is always pre-recorded and not sung live, but it does have pictures of her in the original production. Finally, I have the original cast recording if that helps.  +++$+++ :But anyway, the role was written for her, she was the original performer, and it specifically calls for an E6. (I think this is actually specified in audition information for Phantom, but I'd have to find old issues of Backstage magazine to make sure.) I do have a copy of the official Phantom of the Opera songbook with sheet music, and that note is specified. The book wouldn't have pictures of her singing the note since that song is always pre-recorded and not sung live, but it does have pictures of her in the original production. Finally, I have the original cast recording if that helps. [[User:Crystallina|Crystallina]] 17:25, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
481506 +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ 481504 +++$+++ 481505 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.155087840E09 +++$+++ Okay, songbook added.  +++$+++ ::Okay, songbook added. [[User:Crystallina|Crystallina]] 18:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

267586 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267586 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-20 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.198182900E09 +++$+++ Rosencomet knows the rules.  If he breaks them, report him.  There's no need to confront him directly and I suggest you try to ignore him. &mdash; +++$+++ Rosencomet knows the rules.  If he breaks them, report him.  There's no need to confront him directly and I suggest you try to ignore him. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 12:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
267587 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267586 +++$+++ 267586 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.198183140E09 +++$+++ And just so you understand, I can fully see your side, even if I'm not taking a position on who is right or wrong.  I know what it is like when someone is personally attacking me or making false comments about my character or my ideas. &mdash; +++$+++ :And just so you understand, I can fully see your side, even if I'm not taking a position on who is right or wrong.  I know what it is like when someone is personally attacking me or making false comments about my character or my ideas. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 12:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

263051 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263051 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-02 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.230887340E09 +++$+++ I have started a discussion of categorizing pharmacology articles at [[WT:PHARM:CAT]] and would really appreciate your input.  Also, could you please pass word of this discussion to any other editors you think might consider contribution to the conversation?  +++$+++ I have started a discussion of categorizing pharmacology articles at [[WT:PHARM:CAT]] and would really appreciate your input.  Also, could you please pass word of this discussion to any other editors you think might consider contribution to the conversation? [[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 01:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
263052 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263051 +++$+++ 263051 +++$+++ 2009-02-17 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.234915740E09 +++$+++ I have added an updated draft at [[WT:PHARM:CAT]], and, if avaliable, would appreciate your feedback.  +++$+++ :I have added an updated draft at [[WT:PHARM:CAT]], and, if avaliable, would appreciate your feedback. [[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 16:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

5444 +++$+++ Preacherdoc +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-09 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.210375620E09 +++$+++ Just a quick note of support about the [[Aidan rhyming trend]] article. I am disappointed that so many people seem to think it deserves immediate deletion. They seem to have a very different view of what \"encyclopaedic\" means. When people delete my content and tell me it is un-encyclopaedic, I find it maddening. Don't let them get you down. You've got a wheen of Barnstars to prove what great work you do.  +++$+++ Just a quick note of support about the [[Aidan rhyming trend]] article. I am disappointed that so many people seem to think it deserves immediate deletion. They seem to have a very different view of what "encyclopaedic" means. When people delete my content and tell me it is un-encyclopaedic, I find it maddening. Don't let them get you down. You've got a wheen of Barnstars to prove what great work you do. [[User:Preacherdoc|Preacherdoc]] ([[User talk:Preacherdoc|talk]]) 16:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
5445 +++$+++ Preacherdoc +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5444 +++$+++ 5444 +++$+++ 2008-05-12 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.210628220E09 +++$+++ Well, it's gone. Them's the breaks, I guess. Virtual backslaps to you in abundance.  +++$+++ :Well, it's gone. Them's the breaks, I guess. Virtual backslaps to you in abundance. [[User:Preacherdoc|Preacherdoc]] ([[User talk:Preacherdoc|talk]]) 14:37, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

5446 +++$+++ Charles +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-10 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.210410300E09 +++$+++ Please read that. You don't need to post on my talk page so often.  +++$+++ Please read that. You don't need to post on my talk page so often. [[User talk:Charles|Charles]] 02:05, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
5447 +++$+++ Charles +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5446 +++$+++ 5446 +++$+++ 2008-05-10 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.210410720E09 +++$+++ Your way is NOT how it is done on Wikipedia. Read [[WP:OWN]] as suggested before trying to assert ownership over article content with what you think is \"right\". The fact of the matter is Nicholas II is not first referred to as Nikolai II, regardless of what you think. I dare you to go change that article lest you automatically abandon that argument.  +++$+++ :Your way is NOT how it is done on Wikipedia. Read [[WP:OWN]] as suggested before trying to assert ownership over article content with what you think is "right". The fact of the matter is Nicholas II is not first referred to as Nikolai II, regardless of what you think. I dare you to go change that article lest you automatically abandon that argument. [[User talk:Charles|Charles]] 02:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

267592 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-20 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.198186020E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict) ::::I have no idea who is behind the sock puppets. All I know is that they persecuted me until they were shut down in January\/February of 2007 and several have sprung up since. I am not sophisticated about that sort of thing. Ask [[User:Blnguyen]] or someone else who knows.  +++$+++ (edit conflict) ::::I have no idea who is behind the sock puppets. All I know is that they persecuted me until they were shut down in January/February of 2007 and several have sprung up since. I am not sophisticated about that sort of thing. Ask [[User:Blnguyen]] or someone else who knows. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
267593 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267592 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.198186140E09 +++$+++ Well, ''get sophisticated'' -- quickly.  Why wasn't a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|request for checkuser]] filed? &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Well, ''get sophisticated'' -- quickly.  Why wasn't a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|request for checkuser]] filed? &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 13:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

5450 +++$+++ Law Lord +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-14 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.210793400E09 +++$+++ Please see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Charles&diff=prev&oldid=212224794] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALaw_Lord&diff=212227179&oldid=206089698]. -- +++$+++ Please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Charles&diff=prev&oldid=212224794] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALaw_Lord&diff=212227179&oldid=206089698]. --[[User:Law Lord|Law Lord]] ([[User talk:Law Lord|talk]]) 12:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
5451 +++$+++ Charles +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5450 +++$+++ 5450 +++$+++ 2008-05-14 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.210809840E09 +++$+++ Oh, get over it. Don't come to people's pages being nasty, Law Lord, and expect to be received warmly. Good day, Bookworm.  +++$+++ :Oh, get over it. Don't come to people's pages being nasty, Law Lord, and expect to be received warmly. Good day, Bookworm. [[User talk:Charles|Charles]] 17:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

267596 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-20 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.198187040E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict) : Numerous checkusers were filed. The answer from the sock puppets were that checkusers were \"pixie dust\". How can I get more sophisticated? What should I do, as I have no clue. It is only through the kindness of a few people (all but one driven off by Starwood Arbitration) that I have managed to survive here.   +++$+++ (edit conflict) : Numerous checkusers were filed. The answer from the sock puppets were that checkusers were "pixie dust". How can I get more sophisticated? What should I do, as I have no clue. It is only through the kindness of a few people (all but one driven off by Starwood Arbitration) that I have managed to survive here.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
267597 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267596 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.198187220E09 +++$+++ That's not your fault.  There are several limitations with the checkuser system.  Anyhoo, do me a favor and put all of your energy into working on some more articles and let this go for 24 hours.  My offer to remove any attacks still stands. &mdash; +++$+++ ::That's not your fault.  There are several limitations with the checkuser system.  Anyhoo, do me a favor and put all of your energy into working on some more articles and let this go for 24 hours.  My offer to remove any attacks still stands. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 13:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
267598 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267596 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.198187400E09 +++$+++ Have you bothered to look at my edit history? Please do so with Kate's tool before you advise me on how I should edit articles.   +++$+++ :::Have you bothered to look at my edit history? Please do so with Kate's tool before you advise me on how I should edit articles.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
267599 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267596 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.198187520E09 +++$+++ May I ask you, with all respect, what is your native language? &mdash; +++$+++ ::::May I ask you, with all respect, what is your native language? &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 13:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
267600 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267596 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.198188060E09 +++$+++ English is my native language. If you want to be a rescuer you can start by remove this: \": After being dragged through hell by you and your many sock-puppets,...\" directed at me from just above your comment on the Starwood talk page. This whole conversation with you is ugly. I am not going to spend my time now hunting down all the personal attacks on me by Rosencomet. Why should I have to relive this awfulness again? I merely want to be able to edit the articles I want without personal attacks from Rosencomet. I would prefer not to continue this conversation with you. I will seek help elsewhere.  +++$+++ :::::English is my native language. If you want to be a rescuer you can start by remove this: ": After being dragged through hell by you and your many sock-puppets,..." directed at me from just above your comment on the Starwood talk page. This whole conversation with you is ugly. I am not going to spend my time now hunting down all the personal attacks on me by Rosencomet. Why should I have to relive this awfulness again? I merely want to be able to edit the articles I want without personal attacks from Rosencomet. I would prefer not to continue this conversation with you. I will seek help elsewhere. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:01, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
267601 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267596 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.198188420E09 +++$+++ I apologize for offending you, and no, I don't take offense at your insulting comments about me, but thank you for expressing your concern for my welfare.  Clearly this dispute is all about you, and I wouldn't want to get in the way of your crusade.  Good luck. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::I apologize for offending you, and no, I don't take offense at your insulting comments about me, but thank you for expressing your concern for my welfare.  Clearly this dispute is all about you, and I wouldn't want to get in the way of your crusade.  Good luck. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 14:07, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
267602 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267596 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.198188600E09 +++$+++ And I do not take offense at your insulting comments about me. However I am tired of this conversation as you are one of many who has stepped in to try to help Rosencomet. I do not care to go through the experience again.   +++$+++ :::::::And I do not take offense at your insulting comments about me. However I am tired of this conversation as you are one of many who has stepped in to try to help Rosencomet. I do not care to go through the experience again.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

529745 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-10 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.221094980E09 +++$+++ Royalbroil-I went through each of the Wisconsin counties and change the heading from Cities and towns to Cities, villages, and towns where applicable. I did the same for [[Marathon County, Wisconsin]] but ran into problems with the format:the unincorporated communities are within the Cities, viilages, and towns section and they should be in their own section like the other Wisconsin counties.I try putting them within their own section and it did not work out well. Please take a look at the Marathon County, Wisconsin article and see what you can do. Many thanks- +++$+++ Royalbroil-I went through each of the Wisconsin counties and change the heading from Cities and towns to Cities, villages, and towns where applicable. I did the same for [[Marathon County, Wisconsin]] but ran into problems with the format:the unincorporated communities are within the Cities, viilages, and towns section and they should be in their own section like the other Wisconsin counties.I try putting them within their own section and it did not work out well. Please take a look at the Marathon County, Wisconsin article and see what you can do. Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 18:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
529746 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.221422820E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your comments. I enjoy editing pages especially with those concerning WikiProject Wisconsin. Also I like starting articles about the various Roman Catholic Bishops who had some connections with Wisconsin either by birth or residency. I am familiar with the history of the Roman Catholic Church in Wisconsin. Again, many thanks- +++$+++ ::Many thanks for your comments. I enjoy editing pages especially with those concerning WikiProject Wisconsin. Also I like starting articles about the various Roman Catholic Bishops who had some connections with Wisconsin either by birth or residency. I am familiar with the history of the Roman Catholic Church in Wisconsin. Again, many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
529747 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.221502680E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for starting the article about the Holyland region in Wisconsin. It was well research and written.- +++$+++ ::: Many thanks for starting the article about the Holyland region in Wisconsin. It was well research and written.-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 11:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
529748 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.221513180E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you enjoyed reading it. I was surprised to find a research paper about it. I would have developed the article a long time ago had I known a solid reference existed. I'd like to find some more content and an unusual fact for getting the article included on the [[WP:AFMP|April Fool's Day Main Page]] Did You Know coverage. Something like Did You Know ... that the first settlers of The Holyland were German-speaking Prussian Roman Catholics? '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::I'm glad you enjoyed reading it. I was surprised to find a research paper about it. I would have developed the article a long time ago had I known a solid reference existed. I'd like to find some more content and an unusual fact for getting the article included on the [[WP:AFMP|April Fool's Day Main Page]] Did You Know coverage. Something like Did You Know ... that the first settlers of The Holyland were German-speaking Prussian Roman Catholics? '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 14:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
529749 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.221518700E09 +++$+++ The Wisconsin Historical Society might have something. I am a little amuse about \"German-speaking Prussian Roman Catholics.\" I always associated Prussia with Martin Luther and the Lutheran Church. Although I am Roman Catholic, my ancestors came from Prussia and they were German Lutheran.Many thanks- +++$+++ ::The Wisconsin Historical Society might have something. I am a little amuse about "German-speaking Prussian Roman Catholics." I always associated Prussia with Martin Luther and the Lutheran Church. Although I am Roman Catholic, my ancestors came from Prussia and they were German Lutheran.Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 15:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
529750 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.221522900E09 +++$+++ The Holyland area is renowned even today for having extremely high percentage of German-descent Roman Catholics. I grew up on the edge and most people in that area are distant relatives of mine. There are almost no Lutherans except for people that came to the area from different locations. Most people spoke German, and any people didn't even learn English until around the 1930s. Thanks for the tip about the Wisconsin Historical Society - I didn't think to look there. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::The Holyland area is renowned even today for having extremely high percentage of German-descent Roman Catholics. I grew up on the edge and most people in that area are distant relatives of mine. There are almost no Lutherans except for people that came to the area from different locations. Most people spoke German, and any people didn't even learn English until around the 1930s. Thanks for the tip about the Wisconsin Historical Society - I didn't think to look there. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 16:55, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
529751 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.221592080E09 +++$+++ I repair a reference in the Marytown, Wisconsin article-it was aa article written by Kathryn Bartel about the history of Marytown. Kathryn Bartel mentioned Holyland. Maybe, you can use that article for the Holyland article. Thanks- +++$+++ ::I repair a reference in the Marytown, Wisconsin article-it was aa article written by Kathryn Bartel about the history of Marytown. Kathryn Bartel mentioned Holyland. Maybe, you can use that article for the Holyland article. Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 12:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

5459 +++$+++ Stubbleboy +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-02 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.217681760E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Or how could you forget!!? I haven't been around too much lately, but wow you have.  You progressed so fast and you were so proficient.  Go write a book already!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Or how could you forget!!? I haven't been around too much lately, but wow you have.  You progressed so fast and you were so proficient.  Go write a book already! [[User:Stubbleboy|Stubbleboy]] ([[User talk:Stubbleboy|talk]]) 05:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
5460 +++$+++ Stubbleboy +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5459 +++$+++ 5459 +++$+++ 2008-08-09 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.218337680E09 +++$+++ Bookworm - May I nominate you as an admin??  +++$+++ *Bookworm - May I nominate you as an admin?? [[User:Stubbleboy|Stubbleboy]] ([[User talk:Stubbleboy|talk]]) 20:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

5463 +++$+++ Surtsicna +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-31 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.220226180E09 +++$+++ According to Wikipedia, Tsarevich is a title used for ''any'' son of the Tsar, while Tsesarevich is a substantive title used only for the ''eldest'' son of the Tsar, and that's what Alexei was. Alexei, Tsarevich of Russia is as wrong as Charles, Prince of the United Kingdom. It should be either Tsarevich Alexei Nikolaevich of Russia or Alexei Nikolaevich, Tsesarevich of Russia (the other option follows Wikipedia's naming conventions).  +++$+++ According to Wikipedia, Tsarevich is a title used for ''any'' son of the Tsar, while Tsesarevich is a substantive title used only for the ''eldest'' son of the Tsar, and that's what Alexei was. Alexei, Tsarevich of Russia is as wrong as Charles, Prince of the United Kingdom. It should be either Tsarevich Alexei Nikolaevich of Russia or Alexei Nikolaevich, Tsesarevich of Russia (the other option follows Wikipedia's naming conventions). [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 16:43, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
5464 +++$+++ Surtsicna +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5463 +++$+++ 5463 +++$+++ 2008-08-31 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.220230560E09 +++$+++ I am sorry for moving the page with discussion. I thought that users intended to distinguish his status as heir by moving the article to X, Title of Y. If you disagree with using Tsesarevich, then I propose Grand Duke Alexei Nikolaevich of Russia since his sisters are Grand Duchess X of Y.  +++$+++ :I am sorry for moving the page with discussion. I thought that users intended to distinguish his status as heir by moving the article to X, Title of Y. If you disagree with using Tsesarevich, then I propose Grand Duke Alexei Nikolaevich of Russia since his sisters are Grand Duchess X of Y. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 17:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
5465 +++$+++ Surtsicna +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5463 +++$+++ 5464 +++$+++ 2008-08-31 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.220232900E09 +++$+++ Then move him to Tsarevich Alexei Nikolaevich of Russia! Just get rid of the current title, which is the most inappropriate.  +++$+++ ::Then move him to Tsarevich Alexei Nikolaevich of Russia! Just get rid of the current title, which is the most inappropriate. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 18:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
5466 +++$+++ Surtsicna +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5463 +++$+++ 5465 +++$+++ 2008-09-01 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.220289600E09 +++$+++ You cannot go by the most familiar name if that name is factually inaccurate. [[Princess Diana]] is the most familiar name for Lady Diana Spencer, yet we cannot call her Princess Diana because she was princess by marriage - thus Princess Charles. 'Name, Title of Place' is format used for '''[[substantive title]]s''' and tsarevich is not a substantive title (another example is [[Prince William of Wales]], who cannot be called William, Prince of Wales). That article needs to be moved immediately either to Tsarevich Alexei Nikolaevich of Russia or Alexei Nikolaevich, Tsesarevich of Russia.  +++$+++ :::You cannot go by the most familiar name if that name is factually inaccurate. [[Princess Diana]] is the most familiar name for Lady Diana Spencer, yet we cannot call her Princess Diana because she was princess by marriage - thus Princess Charles. 'Name, Title of Place' is format used for '''[[substantive title]]s''' and tsarevich is not a substantive title (another example is [[Prince William of Wales]], who cannot be called William, Prince of Wales). That article needs to be moved immediately either to Tsarevich Alexei Nikolaevich of Russia or Alexei Nikolaevich, Tsesarevich of Russia. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 10:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

267609 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267609 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-24 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.198536840E09 +++$+++ Death and Adjustment Hypotheses is now available as a wiki article with the same name. Pls help me wikify it with any other corrections that might hamper it as a wiki article. Its very important for me. +++$+++ Death and Adjustment Hypotheses is now available as a wiki article with the same name. Pls help me wikify it with any other corrections that might hamper it as a wiki article. Its very important for me.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 14:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
267610 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267609 +++$+++ 267609 +++$+++ 2007-12-24 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.198537500E09 +++$+++ Certainly I will, as much as I am able.   +++$+++ :Certainly I will, as much as I am able.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 15:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

267611 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-24 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.198566060E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> -- +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --[[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 23:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
267612 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267611 +++$+++ 267611 +++$+++ 2007-12-22 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.198361340E09 +++$+++ You can create a link [[Iyengar Bakery]] on the page. Then write an article for the link if you can  [[WP:V|verify sources]] of information in your new article. As far as the eight villages, I do not know their names. Perhaps when you are looking up information on Iyengar Bakery, you can find out the names. Happy editing! Regards,   +++$+++ :You can create a link [[Iyengar Bakery]] on the page. Then write an article for the link if you can  [[WP:V|verify sources]] of information in your new article. As far as the eight villages, I do not know their names. Perhaps when you are looking up information on Iyengar Bakery, you can find out the names. Happy editing! Regards,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
267613 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267611 +++$+++ 267611 +++$+++ 2007-12-22 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.198368780E09 +++$+++ I dabbed the link for you on the Hassan district page. <nowiki>[[Iyengar Bakery|Isyengar bakaries]]<\/nowiki> so that it looks like this: [[Iyengar Bakery|Isyengar bakaries]] but actually links to [[Iyengar Bakery]]. You can change it if that is not the way you want it.    +++$+++ :I dabbed the link for you on the Hassan district page. <nowiki>[[Iyengar Bakery|Isyengar bakaries]]</nowiki> so that it looks like this: [[Iyengar Bakery|Isyengar bakaries]] but actually links to [[Iyengar Bakery]]. You can change it if that is not the way you want it.   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 16:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
267614 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267611 +++$+++ 267611 +++$+++ 2007-12-25 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.198629720E09 +++$+++ According to the message on [[Iyengar Bakery]] page, the article was deleted because it was considered \"blatant advertising\". Are you familiar with the policies of wikipedia, especially the  [[WP:V|verifiability]] rules, the  [[WP:NOR|no original research]] rule and the need for a  [[WP:NPOV|neutral point]] of view? You have to give reliable, unbiased third-party references for your article: like [[Articulation (architecture)|Articulation]]. (Notice the footnote references.) I can't thing of a restaurant article for an example  -- here is one: [[Subway (restaurant)]]. Regards,   +++$+++ :According to the message on [[Iyengar Bakery]] page, the article was deleted because it was considered "blatant advertising". Are you familiar with the policies of wikipedia, especially the  [[WP:V|verifiability]] rules, the  [[WP:NOR|no original research]] rule and the need for a  [[WP:NPOV|neutral point]] of view? You have to give reliable, unbiased third-party references for your article: like [[Articulation (architecture)|Articulation]]. (Notice the footnote references.) I can't thing of a restaurant article for an example  -- here is one: [[Subway (restaurant)]]. Regards,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 16:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

44602 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.300922700E09 +++$+++ How does turning an attack back on the attacker constitute an attack in itself? I thought I was very restrained in the face of considerable provocation.  +++$+++ How does turning an attack back on the attacker constitute an attack in itself? I thought I was very restrained in the face of considerable provocation. [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper|talk]]) 16:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
44603 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44602 +++$+++ 44602 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.300927800E09 +++$+++ Please comment on content, not on the contributor. \"He hit me first\" is not an excuse. Ignoring the attack (for which the user had already been warned) or placing the <nowiki>{{uw-npa1}}<\/nowiki> template on the other user's talk page would have been constructive. \"Hitting\" back was not. -  +++$+++ :Please comment on content, not on the contributor. "He hit me first" is not an excuse. Ignoring the attack (for which the user had already been warned) or placing the <nowiki>{{uw-npa1}}</nowiki> template on the other user's talk page would have been constructive. "Hitting" back was not. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 17:50, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
44604 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44602 +++$+++ 44603 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.300941540E09 +++$+++ Right, so I was supposed to just let slide his lies and insults where he actually voiced them? Me pointing out the self-evident falsity of his suggestion that I had \"followed\" him to that particular page was a entirely factual.  +++$+++ ::Right, so I was supposed to just let slide his lies and insults where he actually voiced them? Me pointing out the self-evident falsity of his suggestion that I had "followed" him to that particular page was a entirely factual. [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper|talk]]) 21:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
44605 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44602 +++$+++ 44604 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.300947660E09 +++$+++ You certainly could have addressed the insults and purported lies without calling anyone a \"moron\" or \"conceited\". Their personal attacks were wrong. So were yours. -  +++$+++ :::You certainly could have addressed the insults and purported lies without calling anyone a "moron" or "conceited". Their personal attacks were wrong. So were yours. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 23:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
44606 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44602 +++$+++ 44605 +++$+++ 2011-03-24 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.300987920E09 +++$+++ I used \"moron\" speculatively in inverted commas to mark it out as the word he had already freely and unequivocably aimed at me. I also said I myself was not conceited. Am I allowed to '''not''' insult myself?  +++$+++ ::::I used "moron" speculatively in inverted commas to mark it out as the word he had already freely and unequivocably aimed at me. I also said I myself was not conceited. Am I allowed to '''not''' insult myself? [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper|talk]]) 10:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
44607 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44602 +++$+++ 44606 +++$+++ 2011-03-24 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.300996200E09 +++$+++ The intent and implications of several of your edits are clear. -  +++$+++ :::::The intent and implications of several of your edits are clear. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 12:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

5470 +++$+++ 66.152.166.101 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-06 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.228552080E09 +++$+++ I redirected these because they're only notable as the parents of Virginia Dare, and all the content in both articles which isn't already duplicated in other articles amounts to about three sentences - see [[Virginia Dare#Parents]]. [[Special:Contributions\/66.152.166.101|66.152.166.101]] ( +++$+++ I redirected these because they're only notable as the parents of Virginia Dare, and all the content in both articles which isn't already duplicated in other articles amounts to about three sentences - see [[Virginia Dare#Parents]]. [[Special:Contributions/66.152.166.101|66.152.166.101]] ([[User talk:66.152.166.101|talk]]) 00:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
5471 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5470 +++$+++ 5470 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.228555860E09 +++$+++ I don't agree with your redirection of these articles, which should have been discussed on the talk page first. Eleanor Dare was the subject of the Eleanor Dare Stones back in the 1940s; there's an ongoing discussion about the ancestry and genealogy of Ananias Dare. Do not redirect them again without consensus, please. -- +++$+++ :I don't agree with your redirection of these articles, which should have been discussed on the talk page first. Eleanor Dare was the subject of the Eleanor Dare Stones back in the 1940s; there's an ongoing discussion about the ancestry and genealogy of Ananias Dare. Do not redirect them again without consensus, please. --[[User:Bookworm857158367|Bookworm857158367]] ([[User talk:Bookworm857158367|talk]]) 01:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
5472 +++$+++ 66.152.166.101 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5470 +++$+++ 5471 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.228556400E09 +++$+++ Where can I find the discussion about the ancestry and genealogy of Ananias Dare? [[Special:Contributions\/66.152.166.101|66.152.166.101]] ( +++$+++ ::Where can I find the discussion about the ancestry and genealogy of Ananias Dare? [[Special:Contributions/66.152.166.101|66.152.166.101]] ([[User talk:66.152.166.101|talk]]) 01:40, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

267615 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267615 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-25 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.198595580E09 +++$+++ May this season bring you success, good times and happiness. Looking forward to working with you in the future.<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color=\"red\">H\u03b1v\u03b5lok<\/font>]] [[User talk:Havelock the Dane|<font color=\"red\">\u0431\u0435\u0441\u0435\u0434\u0430<\/font>]]  +++$+++ May this season bring you success, good times and happiness. Looking forward to working with you in the future.<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">Hαvεlok</font>]] [[User talk:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">беседа</font>]] [[User:Havelock the Dane/Garret|<font color="red">мансарда</font>]] 07:13, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
267616 +++$+++ Havelock the Dane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267615 +++$+++ 267615 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.198656600E09 +++$+++ I have the \"Silk Road\" Encyclopedia Britannica article at hand, and the subject is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Havelock_the_Dane\/Garret#Future_plans on my list]. I wonder if it would be possible to use the wonderful image that they have under some license. It beats the one I found [http:\/\/www.orexca.com\/img\/silk_road.jpg here] though the owners have promised a better one soon.<br>I recall reading about the recent coining of the term as well.<br> Warm regards,<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color=\"red\">H\u03b1v\u03b5lok<\/font>]] [[User talk:Havelock the Dane|<font color=\"red\">\u0431\u0435\u0441\u0435\u0434\u0430<\/font>]]  +++$+++ :I have the "Silk Road" Encyclopedia Britannica article at hand, and the subject is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Havelock_the_Dane/Garret#Future_plans on my list]. I wonder if it would be possible to use the wonderful image that they have under some license. It beats the one I found [http://www.orexca.com/img/silk_road.jpg here] though the owners have promised a better one soon.<br>I recall reading about the recent coining of the term as well.<br> Warm regards,<br>[[User:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">Hαvεlok</font>]] [[User talk:Havelock the Dane|<font color="red">беседа</font>]] [[User:Havelock the Dane/Garret|<font color="red">мансарда</font>]] 00:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

5473 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-19 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.229745540E09 +++$+++ Please explain your reasons for reverting my image change on [[Mary (given name)]] with a clear rationale. I had discussed that on the talk page. Else I will have to revert your change. Thanks  +++$+++ Please explain your reasons for reverting my image change on [[Mary (given name)]] with a clear rationale. I had discussed that on the talk page. Else I will have to revert your change. Thanks [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 19:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
5474 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5473 +++$+++ 5473 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.229790480E09 +++$+++ And your statement that \"I prefer it\" seems to imply that others need to follow your personal tastes - not a Wikipedia policy really. But it is not really a question of taste but logic here. I am not attached to the Boticelli, but think the image and the caption should match. My suggestion: Please find another image yourself on commons that matches the caption by implying reverence and use that. Then the inconsistency will vanish. Else I can try several images. I have seen that you like to do reverts elsewhere, but let us not make this world war 4, and arrive at a peaceful resolution by your selecting another image that you feel works, but also matches the caption. Thanks.  +++$+++ :And your statement that "I prefer it" seems to imply that others need to follow your personal tastes - not a Wikipedia policy really. But it is not really a question of taste but logic here. I am not attached to the Boticelli, but think the image and the caption should match. My suggestion: Please find another image yourself on commons that matches the caption by implying reverence and use that. Then the inconsistency will vanish. Else I can try several images. I have seen that you like to do reverts elsewhere, but let us not make this world war 4, and arrive at a peaceful resolution by your selecting another image that you feel works, but also matches the caption. Thanks. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 08:28, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
5475 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5473 +++$+++ 5474 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.229818080E09 +++$+++ OK, I will follow the suggestion you made on my talk page. Keep the Rosetti image on the page, but attach the Boticelli to the infobox text that says reverence. Thank you for being cooperative on this issue.  +++$+++ ::OK, I will follow the suggestion you made on my talk page. Keep the Rosetti image on the page, but attach the Boticelli to the infobox text that says reverence. Thank you for being cooperative on this issue. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 16:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

5476 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5476 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-24 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.230156660E09 +++$+++ [[File:Arbol Navidad 03.gif|thumb|left|Merry Christmas]]  +++$+++ [[File:Arbol Navidad 03.gif|thumb|left|Merry Christmas]] [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 14:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
5477 +++$+++ Jeanne boleyn +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5476 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-24 08:47:00 +++$+++ 1.232815620E09 +++$+++ I see that you created an article on Maria Rasputin. Was Maria's birthdate of 27 March in the Old Style or New Style? Thank you.-- +++$+++ ::I see that you created an article on Maria Rasputin. Was Maria's birthdate of 27 March in the Old Style or New Style? Thank you.--[[User:Jeanne boleyn|jeanne]] ([[User talk:Jeanne boleyn|talk]]) 08:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

267623 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267623 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-29 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.198978980E09 +++$+++ I have filed a request for arbitration where you are an involved party.  Please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration]] and add a statement if you wish.  +++$+++ I have filed a request for arbitration where you are an involved party.  Please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration]] and add a statement if you wish. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]]  <sup>[[User_talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 17:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
267624 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267623 +++$+++ 267623 +++$+++ 2007-12-29 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.198999860E09 +++$+++ I am not really a factor in this case, just the latest excuse for people to treat each other badly:[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=next&oldid=180875070#Unblock_of_Zeraeph] +++$+++ *I am not really a factor in this case, just the latest excuse for people to treat each other badly:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=next&oldid=180875070#Unblock_of_Zeraeph][[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 23:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
267625 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267623 +++$+++ 267624 +++$+++ 2007-12-30 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.199002080E09 +++$+++ I would advise you that I will be referring to the editing of the [[Psychopathy]] article by both Zeraeph and yourself on the 28th December, requests for assistance that followed by both parties, actions taken and the subsequent escalation of the situation - '''should the case be accepted'''. If you do not wish to participate as a party, I will gladly inform you when I have made any submission that references you - so you may be able to respond if desired. I would also advise you that it may be prudent to keep an eye on the case should it go forward, since being an involved party <u>may<\/u> (but not necessarily) mean that any resolution or decision may involve and effect you.  +++$+++ ::I would advise you that I will be referring to the editing of the [[Psychopathy]] article by both Zeraeph and yourself on the 28th December, requests for assistance that followed by both parties, actions taken and the subsequent escalation of the situation - '''should the case be accepted'''. If you do not wish to participate as a party, I will gladly inform you when I have made any submission that references you - so you may be able to respond if desired. I would also advise you that it may be prudent to keep an eye on the case should it go forward, since being an involved party <u>may</u> (but not necessarily) mean that any resolution or decision may involve and effect you. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 00:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
267626 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267623 +++$+++ 267625 +++$+++ 2007-12-30 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.199003040E09 +++$+++ I have seen the way you have operated toward me in the past. I have no faith that anything worthwhile will come out of me being involved in any dialog with you. After all, you are the one the left me hanging out to dry with [[User:Blueboar]]. That you refused to help me and then blamed me for the result is undoubtedly the way you will proceed now.  I have no confidence in your judgment  or anything you say. Sorry, I don't want to play those games with you and your friends. Regards,  +++$+++ :::I have seen the way you have operated toward me in the past. I have no faith that anything worthwhile will come out of me being involved in any dialog with you. After all, you are the one the left me hanging out to dry with [[User:Blueboar]]. That you refused to help me and then blamed me for the result is undoubtedly the way you will proceed now.  I have no confidence in your judgment  or anything you say. Sorry, I don't want to play those games with you and your friends. Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 00:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
267627 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267623 +++$+++ 267626 +++$+++ 2007-12-31 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.199149380E09 +++$+++ No, you don't have to do the whole thing again. You can say at the ArbCom (in the Evidence section once it is accepted) that you have attempted to resolve the dispute between you and Zeraeph, and link to the comments you made at the article talk page. The arbs can then follow the links. Remember, they are not going to decide who has proven that their version is most correct - they are looking to see that all efforts were made to resolve the dispute by all, some or any of the concerned parties. From what I see the dispute at [[psychopathy]] is not the major part, there seems to be some history between Z and SandyGeorgia that is dominating the proceedings.  +++$+++ ::::No, you don't have to do the whole thing again. You can say at the ArbCom (in the Evidence section once it is accepted) that you have attempted to resolve the dispute between you and Zeraeph, and link to the comments you made at the article talk page. The arbs can then follow the links. Remember, they are not going to decide who has proven that their version is most correct - they are looking to see that all efforts were made to resolve the dispute by all, some or any of the concerned parties. From what I see the dispute at [[psychopathy]] is not the major part, there seems to be some history between Z and SandyGeorgia that is dominating the proceedings. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 17:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
267628 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267623 +++$+++ 267627 +++$+++ 2007-12-31 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.199153760E09 +++$+++ I do not see that I am involved at all. I do not know any of the parties involved. My only misfortune was contacting you regarding Z. That hardly qualifies as an arbitration issue. I do not want to become a member of the caste of continuing characters of Z's ongoing drama.   +++$+++ :::::I do not see that I am involved at all. I do not know any of the parties involved. My only misfortune was contacting you regarding Z. That hardly qualifies as an arbitration issue. I do not want to become a member of the caste of continuing characters of Z's ongoing drama.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
267629 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267623 +++$+++ 267628 +++$+++ 2007-12-31 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.199172540E09 +++$+++ As I will make clear in my evidence - should the case be accepted - that the current situation was created as a result of Z editing the psychopathy article, the attempts by me and SlimVirgin to resolve the matter, which lead to input by various parties decrying Z's unblock in the first instance, and thereon. The edits to psychopathy is not the prime consideration - and may be no consideration at all. As I said, if and when I produce my evidence I will let you know in case there is anything that you disagree with or wish to add.  +++$+++ ::::::As I will make clear in my evidence - should the case be accepted - that the current situation was created as a result of Z editing the psychopathy article, the attempts by me and SlimVirgin to resolve the matter, which lead to input by various parties decrying Z's unblock in the first instance, and thereon. The edits to psychopathy is not the prime consideration - and may be no consideration at all. As I said, if and when I produce my evidence I will let you know in case there is anything that you disagree with or wish to add. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 23:29, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

175676 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Kevmin +++$+++ 175676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.312416060E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of ''[[Tortrix? destructus]]'', ''[[Tortrix? florissantana]]'' at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Tortrix destructus, Tortrix florissantana|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of ''[[Tortrix? destructus]]'', ''[[Tortrix? florissantana]]'' at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Tortrix destructus, Tortrix florissantana|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 17:01, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
175677 +++$+++ Kevmin +++$+++ Kevmin +++$+++ 175676 +++$+++ 175676 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.312434000E09 +++$+++ I've clarified the reqested points in the articles as much as I can and responded at Dyk... -- +++$+++ :I've clarified the reqested points in the articles as much as I can and responded at Dyk... --[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 22:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

612811 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-28 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.185677940E09 +++$+++ As a Canadian who grew up with a mix of American and British spellings who now lives in the US and constantly makes mistakes about which spelling to choose when, I apologize. In particular, I thought \"center\" was the British spelling and \"centre\" was the American spelling, a relic of the US Revolutionary war when many British spellings were rejected in favor of French spellings (possibly for pretentious reasons as well). For example, the British leftenant is a lieutenant in the US. I am constantly confused and getting it wrong because I have had to spell just about everything at least two different ways. I also speak French, so that makes things even worse, and the Canadian French of course is distorted by the presence of so much English around it, particularly American English.-- +++$+++ As a Canadian who grew up with a mix of American and British spellings who now lives in the US and constantly makes mistakes about which spelling to choose when, I apologize. In particular, I thought "center" was the British spelling and "centre" was the American spelling, a relic of the US Revolutionary war when many British spellings were rejected in favor of French spellings (possibly for pretentious reasons as well). For example, the British leftenant is a lieutenant in the US. I am constantly confused and getting it wrong because I have had to spell just about everything at least two different ways. I also speak French, so that makes things even worse, and the Canadian French of course is distorted by the presence of so much English around it, particularly American English.--[[User:Filll|Filll]] 19:59, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
612812 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612811 +++$+++ 612811 +++$+++ 2007-07-28 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.185681120E09 +++$+++ Sorry Filll, just my way of kidding. Stiff upper lip old chap. Of course Herr Leutnant (iirc) is spelt lieutenant and pronounced leftenant in the UK, or lootenant in the US. Hope you didn't mind me having some fun while moving your article, it was a valuable excursion since it brought me [http:\/\/www.bcseweb.org.uk\/index.php\/Main\/McIntoshsLaw McIntosh's Law of Thermodynamics], a splendid article on a subject where I've long been looking for good answers. Much ta, ...  +++$+++ :Sorry Filll, just my way of kidding. Stiff upper lip old chap. Of course Herr Leutnant (iirc) is spelt lieutenant and pronounced leftenant in the UK, or lootenant in the US. Hope you didn't mind me having some fun while moving your article, it was a valuable excursion since it brought me [http://www.bcseweb.org.uk/index.php/Main/McIntoshsLaw McIntosh's Law of Thermodynamics], a splendid article on a subject where I've long been looking for good answers. Much ta, ... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

529774 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-01 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.222904100E09 +++$+++ Hi! Do you have any photos about Busseyville, Wisconsin in the town of Sumner in [[Jefferson County, Wisconsin]]?The town of Sumner article makes reference to Busseyville and a notable Swedish-American ornithologist [[Thure Kumlien]] did some research in Busseyville. An article should be started about Busseyville. Thanks- +++$+++ Hi! Do you have any photos about Busseyville, Wisconsin in the town of Sumner in [[Jefferson County, Wisconsin]]?The town of Sumner article makes reference to Busseyville and a notable Swedish-American ornithologist [[Thure Kumlien]] did some research in Busseyville. An article should be started about Busseyville. Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 16:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
529775 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529774 +++$+++ 529774 +++$+++ 2008-10-01 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.222904340E09 +++$+++ Nope, never heard of it. Looking at my map of the roads that I have traveled through Wisconsin, I've never been through it. I could start and article if you don't beat me to it. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Nope, never heard of it. Looking at my map of the roads that I have traveled through Wisconsin, I've never been through it. I could start and article if you don't beat me to it. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 16:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
529776 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529774 +++$+++ 529775 +++$+++ 2008-10-02 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.222989960E09 +++$+++ Many thanks-for the [[Busseyville, Wisconsin]] article. I added some information about Thure Kumlien. I had been spending lots at the clinic with some ongoing health problems otherwise I would had started the article myself.Thanks- +++$+++ ::Many thanks-for the [[Busseyville, Wisconsin]] article. I added some information about Thure Kumlien. I had been spending lots at the clinic with some ongoing health problems otherwise I would had started the article myself.Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 16:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
529777 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529774 +++$+++ 529776 +++$+++ 2008-10-03 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.223017800E09 +++$+++ No problem - it was easy. I split almost all of the content from the town's article. For future reference, I'll create an article for any pictures that I'll take, so you don't need to ask if I took pictures. I'll pray for your health and well-being. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::No problem - it was easy. I split almost all of the content from the town's article. For future reference, I'll create an article for any pictures that I'll take, so you don't need to ask if I took pictures. I'll pray for your health and well-being. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

267632 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-04 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.199488920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 15:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
267633 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267632 +++$+++ 267632 +++$+++ 2008-01-04 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.199509440E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry about not answering sooner. I'm involved in an ugly Wikipedia arbitration. I am no sure what you mean about the book. Is it the article? I tried to work on it, but much of it I don't understand, I'm afraid. I have gotten mixed up. Sincerely,   +++$+++ :I'm sorry about not answering sooner. I'm involved in an ugly Wikipedia arbitration. I am no sure what you mean about the book. Is it the article? I tried to work on it, but much of it I don't understand, I'm afraid. I have gotten mixed up. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 21:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

5489 +++$+++ 76.195.94.220 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5489 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-06 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.244348160E09 +++$+++ www.cryptojews.com\/Antonio_Hernandez.htm[[Special:Contributions\/76.195.94.220|76.195.94.220]] ( +++$+++ www.cryptojews.com/Antonio_Hernandez.htm[[Special:Contributions/76.195.94.220|76.195.94.220]] ([[User talk:76.195.94.220|talk]]) 21:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
5490 +++$+++ 75.21.124.148 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5489 +++$+++ 5489 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.244959560E09 +++$+++ Bookie, you have clear-headed, excellent points, just as the ''undeservedly loved'' Trusivler said of you. It was one of the few rational things he ever said. DON'T QUIT! Don't let those damned bullies hurt your feelings; you have excellent ideas for that page! I am a little more in support of you than I am with the general feel at the [[Talk:Anna Anderson]]page, because you say, \"Treat KURTH'S BOOK fairly,\" and I like that. That is proper scholarship. What you said is what I've been telling them since early April--Kurth cannot be erased just because they don't like his '''probable but not conclusively proved lies\/frauds'''. He did write a book that was \"THE\" source for Anna, everyone's source from 1983 until the late 1990s. And I resent finneganw making the silly claim that \"many libraries have moved\" Kurth to fiction. That's horsefeathers and he knows it. They are just trying to goad you... then you stick up for yourself, then they run to the new admin we have over there and get you banned unjustly. Look at the admin's talk page; they're at it already because they are not scholars or journalists or anything. Don't let them get to you, please![[Special:Contributions\/75.21.124.148|75.21.124.148]] ( +++$+++ :Bookie, you have clear-headed, excellent points, just as the ''undeservedly loved'' Trusivler said of you. It was one of the few rational things he ever said. DON'T QUIT! Don't let those damned bullies hurt your feelings; you have excellent ideas for that page! I am a little more in support of you than I am with the general feel at the [[Talk:Anna Anderson]]page, because you say, "Treat KURTH'S BOOK fairly," and I like that. That is proper scholarship. What you said is what I've been telling them since early April--Kurth cannot be erased just because they don't like his '''probable but not conclusively proved lies/frauds'''. He did write a book that was "THE" source for Anna, everyone's source from 1983 until the late 1990s. And I resent finneganw making the silly claim that "many libraries have moved" Kurth to fiction. That's horsefeathers and he knows it. They are just trying to goad you... then you stick up for yourself, then they run to the new admin we have over there and get you banned unjustly. Look at the admin's talk page; they're at it already because they are not scholars or journalists or anything. Don't let them get to you, please![[Special:Contributions/75.21.124.148|75.21.124.148]] ([[User talk:75.21.124.148|talk]]) 23:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

529778 +++$+++ Piledhigheranddeeper +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529778 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-03 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.223069340E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Piledhigheranddeeper|Piledhigheranddeeper]] ([[User talk:Piledhigheranddeeper|talk]]) 14:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
529779 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529778 +++$+++ 529778 +++$+++ 2008-10-03 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.223069820E09 +++$+++ Well you have it nominated for DYK, so it's expected to be in pretty good form by the time it runs. The references can be out of order, that's not too big of a deal in my opinion. I always consolidate the references as I'm writing, I find it easier that way. There still are some basic topics that are missing, but I keep finding it harder and harder to find them. Offhand, I can think of few uncovered topics. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Well you have it nominated for DYK, so it's expected to be in pretty good form by the time it runs. The references can be out of order, that's not too big of a deal in my opinion. I always consolidate the references as I'm writing, I find it easier that way. There still are some basic topics that are missing, but I keep finding it harder and harder to find them. Offhand, I can think of few uncovered topics. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 14:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

5491 +++$+++ Aggiebean +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-14 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.244967120E09 +++$+++ No, I personally know librarians who have told me the book was removed once the final DNA results were published in March. Bookworm, I want you to know that I do not consider you among the 'delusional fanatics' who cannot behave properly and live in another realm. However I do think it's unfortunate that you seem to put the feelings of Kurth and Schweitzer above reality and accuracy in the article. +++$+++ No, I personally know librarians who have told me the book was removed once the final DNA results were published in March. Bookworm, I want you to know that I do not consider you among the 'delusional fanatics' who cannot behave properly and live in another realm. However I do think it's unfortunate that you seem to put the feelings of Kurth and Schweitzer above reality and accuracy in the article.[[User:Aggiebean|Aggiebean]] ([[User talk:Aggiebean|talk]]) 01:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
5492 +++$+++ ChatNoir24 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5491 +++$+++ 5491 +++$+++ 2009-06-14 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.245019380E09 +++$+++ Sorry, Aggiebean, we are not talkin feelings here. We are talking about the facts of Anna Anderson's life that led up to her lawsuit and formed her life. Facts that you want to be silenced, probably because they pose a challenge to the DNA. But that's how history works, you cannot just present one side and sweep the rest under the carpet. And no matter what the DNA outcome was, it does not change one line of Peter Kurth's book. What happened, happened.  +++$+++ :Sorry, Aggiebean, we are not talkin feelings here. We are talking about the facts of Anna Anderson's life that led up to her lawsuit and formed her life. Facts that you want to be silenced, probably because they pose a challenge to the DNA. But that's how history works, you cannot just present one side and sweep the rest under the carpet. And no matter what the DNA outcome was, it does not change one line of Peter Kurth's book. What happened, happened. [[User:ChatNoir24|ChatNoir24]] ([[User talk:ChatNoir24|talk]]) 15:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
5493 +++$+++ 75.21.124.148 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5491 +++$+++ 5491 +++$+++ 2009-06-15 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.245067020E09 +++$+++ And a last gasp for you Bookworm: do you see that up there, in aggie-girl's post? She knows librarians who moved the book... what CRAP. If that is not \"original research\" with NO place in Wikipedia, then what ''is''?? And she sneaks this in as if it were gospel and irrefutable. We wanted facts, reliable sources, but we get the above instead. Godspeed, Bookworm, I'm GONE. It is what the hell I should have done in the 1st place when I vanished. Tell aggiebean next time you respond that she should watch my case and see where stupid arrogance gets you. And for heaven's sake, I am not ChatNoir24, I think you know that![[Special:Contributions\/75.21.124.148|75.21.124.148]] ( +++$+++ :And a last gasp for you Bookworm: do you see that up there, in aggie-girl's post? She knows librarians who moved the book... what CRAP. If that is not "original research" with NO place in Wikipedia, then what ''is''?? And she sneaks this in as if it were gospel and irrefutable. We wanted facts, reliable sources, but we get the above instead. Godspeed, Bookworm, I'm GONE. It is what the hell I should have done in the 1st place when I vanished. Tell aggiebean next time you respond that she should watch my case and see where stupid arrogance gets you. And for heaven's sake, I am not ChatNoir24, I think you know that![[Special:Contributions/75.21.124.148|75.21.124.148]] ([[User talk:75.21.124.148|talk]]) 04:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

5496 +++$+++  +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-15 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.245049320E09 +++$+++ Yes it would appear that there is no substantial reason to delete the article. [[Finneganw|Finneganw]], 00:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ Yes it would appear that there is no substantial reason to delete the article. [[Finneganw|Finneganw]], 00:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
5497 +++$+++ 75.21.124.148 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5496 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-15 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.245067200E09 +++$+++ Ha, sockpuppetry at its finest. If not, well-done replica of sockpuppetry. And watch out for the usersnakes. The above is a bid to trick you, curry your favor. Fair warning. That is all I have to say, except one more \"Godspeed\" for you, Bookworm.[[Special:Contributions\/75.21.124.148|75.21.124.148]] ( +++$+++ ::Ha, sockpuppetry at its finest. If not, well-done replica of sockpuppetry. And watch out for the usersnakes. The above is a bid to trick you, curry your favor. Fair warning. That is all I have to say, except one more "Godspeed" for you, Bookworm.[[Special:Contributions/75.21.124.148|75.21.124.148]] ([[User talk:75.21.124.148|talk]]) 05:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

529785 +++$+++ AdjustShift +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529785 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-07 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.223424300E09 +++$+++ Dear Royalbroil, I've nominated [[Rockford Speedway]], an article you started, for the \"Did you know\". I know you have lots of DYKs. Please see the hook at [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_October_7]]. Have a nice day!  +++$+++ Dear Royalbroil, I've nominated [[Rockford Speedway]], an article you started, for the "Did you know". I know you have lots of DYKs. Please see the hook at [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_October_7]]. Have a nice day! [[User:AdjustShift|AdjustShift]] ([[User talk:AdjustShift|talk]]) 17:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
529786 +++$+++ AdjustShift +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529785 +++$+++ 529785 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.223424420E09 +++$+++ Sorry! You already nominated the article for the DYK. :-) Have a nice day!  +++$+++ :Sorry! You already nominated the article for the DYK. :-) Have a nice day! [[User:AdjustShift|AdjustShift]] ([[User talk:AdjustShift|talk]]) 17:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
529787 +++$+++ AdjustShift +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529785 +++$+++ 529786 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.223424600E09 +++$+++ I've suggested another hook. You might like that! :-)  +++$+++ ::I've suggested another hook. You might like that! :-) [[User:AdjustShift|AdjustShift]] ([[User talk:AdjustShift|talk]]) 17:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
529788 +++$+++ AdjustShift +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529785 +++$+++ 529787 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.223430600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply. Have a nice day! :-)  +++$+++ :::Thanks for your reply. Have a nice day! :-) [[User:AdjustShift|AdjustShift]] ([[User talk:AdjustShift|talk]]) 18:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

5498 +++$+++ Aggiebean +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-15 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.245087660E09 +++$+++ Bookworm may not agree with Finneganw and I but he\/she knows we are two very different people. He was here a year or 2 before I ever came to wikipedia. Your 'arguments' do not belong on a personal talk page have nothing to do with Susy Clemens. +++$+++ Bookworm may not agree with Finneganw and I but he/she knows we are two very different people. He was here a year or 2 before I ever came to wikipedia. Your 'arguments' do not belong on a personal talk page have nothing to do with Susy Clemens.[[User:Aggiebean|Aggiebean]] ([[User talk:Aggiebean|talk]]) 10:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
5499 +++$+++ 75.21.124.148 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5498 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-16 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.245215220E09 +++$+++ I think your skulduggery and deceptions have A LOT to do with Susy Clemens. Just as you thought I had a lot to do with [[Noahidism]]. No, aggiebean, you're not doing this to me again, or to anyone else.[[Special:Contributions\/75.21.124.148|75.21.124.148]] ( +++$+++ ::I think your skulduggery and deceptions have A LOT to do with Susy Clemens. Just as you thought I had a lot to do with [[Noahidism]]. No, aggiebean, you're not doing this to me again, or to anyone else.[[Special:Contributions/75.21.124.148|75.21.124.148]] ([[User talk:75.21.124.148|talk]]) 22:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

267644 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267644 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-08 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.199844000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 18:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
267645 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267644 +++$+++ 267644 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.199844900E09 +++$+++ Sorry! I have been wrapped up in Christmas holidays here. Also there is an Arbitration on wiki that involves me so I have not been feeling very good (because of the Arbitration). One of my problems with the article  that I do not understand it beyond a certain point. I will order the book from Amazon as soon as I can.  And I will look at the article again today.  Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Sorry! I have been wrapped up in Christmas holidays here. Also there is an Arbitration on wiki that involves me so I have not been feeling very good (because of the Arbitration). One of my problems with the article  that I do not understand it beyond a certain point. I will order the book from Amazon as soon as I can.  And I will look at the article again today.  Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
267646 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267644 +++$+++ 267645 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.199870520E09 +++$+++ Thanks! But please do not take anything as a load on your shoulder. Let me know if the book is better than the article for you. +++$+++ :: Thanks! But please do not take anything as a load on your shoulder. Let me know if the book is better than the article for you.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 01:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
267647 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267644 +++$+++ 267646 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.199870820E09 +++$+++ O.K. Thanks! I will do my best. Sincerely,   +++$+++ :::O.K. Thanks! I will do my best. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 01:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
267648 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267644 +++$+++ 267647 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.199938440E09 +++$+++ I have ordered the book.   +++$+++ ::::I have ordered the book.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 20:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
267649 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267644 +++$+++ 267648 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.200005220E09 +++$+++ It is really friendly and nice of you! +++$+++ :::::It is really friendly and nice of you![[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 14:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

529789 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-07 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.223429040E09 +++$+++ You wanna take a look at this guy's contributions ([[Special:Contributions\/Eastonguy|Eastonguy]])?  He uploaded a pic of [[Tony Stewart]] that was more than likely meant to be mean, as well as the mugshot from [[Aaron Fike]]'s arrest, both of which are displayed on their respective pages.  The Stewart photo has no author information, and is already nominated for speedy deletion.  The Fike pic is not nominated, and was more than likely stolen from photobucket (as it is named as the source).  Thanks in advance!!  <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ You wanna take a look at this guy's contributions ([[Special:Contributions/Eastonguy|Eastonguy]])?  He uploaded a pic of [[Tony Stewart]] that was more than likely meant to be mean, as well as the mugshot from [[Aaron Fike]]'s arrest, both of which are displayed on their respective pages.  The Stewart photo has no author information, and is already nominated for speedy deletion.  The Fike pic is not nominated, and was more than likely stolen from photobucket (as it is named as the source).  Thanks in advance!!  <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 18:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
529790 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529789 +++$+++ 529789 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.223436660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the quick action.  I wasn't really sure on Wiki's policies concerning what that guy did, so i left it up to the Pro's.  <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ : Thanks for the quick action.  I wasn't really sure on Wiki's policies concerning what that guy did, so i left it up to the Pro's.  <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 20:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
529791 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529789 +++$+++ 529789 +++$+++ 2008-10-09 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.223596140E09 +++$+++ I'd be willing to help you out, provided all of the pics DO actually belong to you, and won't be used in malicious ways.  I finally got the hang of properly copyrighting photos for use on here.  Give me a shout on my talk page, and I can walk you through the process.  <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ :I'd be willing to help you out, provided all of the pics DO actually belong to you, and won't be used in malicious ways.  I finally got the hang of properly copyrighting photos for use on here.  Give me a shout on my talk page, and I can walk you through the process.  <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 16:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

5503 +++$+++ Aggiebean +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-18 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.245389400E09 +++$+++ About the new AA book, it was posted by FA on the AP forum, but since all the suvivor threads have been merged into each other in ways I don't understand I can no longer find anything. The post said that someone who was in correspondence with the site was doing research and had found \"MUCH MUCH MUCH\" new previously unknown info that would completely prove AA was FS and answer all the questions about her case. It is supposed to go to the printers next year. I can't wait either. I'm only sorry I wasn't the one to find out all that stuff, but being that I have no money to travel the world and get into archives and stuff and track down the FS family I have no chance of that. If they have letters, pics and stories proving AA was FS then will you believe it? I know Chat never will. +++$+++ About the new AA book, it was posted by FA on the AP forum, but since all the suvivor threads have been merged into each other in ways I don't understand I can no longer find anything. The post said that someone who was in correspondence with the site was doing research and had found "MUCH MUCH MUCH" new previously unknown info that would completely prove AA was FS and answer all the questions about her case. It is supposed to go to the printers next year. I can't wait either. I'm only sorry I wasn't the one to find out all that stuff, but being that I have no money to travel the world and get into archives and stuff and track down the FS family I have no chance of that. If they have letters, pics and stories proving AA was FS then will you believe it? I know Chat never will.[[User:Aggiebean|Aggiebean]] ([[User talk:Aggiebean|talk]]) 22:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
5504 +++$+++ 75.21.155.47 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5503 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.245405720E09 +++$+++ Well I know one thing, I KNOW on the basis of proof and the sources that she WAS Franziska Schanskowska. I'm not denying that should be in the entry. See what I just commented on the talk page. Whereas, a problem I see as a big one is the shoveling of POVs instead of sticking to fact. ChatNoir has done enough... but we have this new problem regarding Kurth. Aggie, you already know from me what that problem is. Let's work on it together![[Special:Contributions\/75.21.155.47|75.21.155.47]] ( +++$+++ ::Well I know one thing, I KNOW on the basis of proof and the sources that she WAS Franziska Schanskowska. I'm not denying that should be in the entry. See what I just commented on the talk page. Whereas, a problem I see as a big one is the shoveling of POVs instead of sticking to fact. ChatNoir has done enough... but we have this new problem regarding Kurth. Aggie, you already know from me what that problem is. Let's work on it together![[Special:Contributions/75.21.155.47|75.21.155.47]] ([[User talk:75.21.155.47|talk]]) 03:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

529793 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529793 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-09 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.223587020E09 +++$+++ Hey, how's it goin'? Cool. Nice photos, I always love a well illustrated article. How was your trip to Rockford? :-) I'm pretty close to Rockford, DeKalb is about 30 or so odd miles away. I have made one photography excursion there, in better days. ;-) I have the article open in a new tab right now. I will read over it, confer with Kranar about it off-wiki too, he's sure to know tons more than I do, as he is quite the racing fan. -- +++$+++ Hey, how's it goin'? Cool. Nice photos, I always love a well illustrated article. How was your trip to Rockford? :-) I'm pretty close to Rockford, DeKalb is about 30 or so odd miles away. I have made one photography excursion there, in better days. ;-) I have the article open in a new tab right now. I will read over it, confer with Kranar about it off-wiki too, he's sure to know tons more than I do, as he is quite the racing fan. --[[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 14:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
529794 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529793 +++$+++ 529793 +++$+++ 2008-10-09 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.223587620E09 +++$+++ Yea, I've driven though beautiful DeKalb on IL 23 to bypass Chicago - 20 states total. This was a special trip just to see the races and I've never driven 2.5 hours just to see races before. As race fans say, \"A bad day at the track beats a good day doing anything else\", not that it was a bad day! I wish the frontstretch didn't have so much fencing because I couldn't get nice pictures of the cars racing. Otherwise the pictures turned out well. I didn't know that Kranar was a racing fan. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Yea, I've driven though beautiful DeKalb on IL 23 to bypass Chicago - 20 states total. This was a special trip just to see the races and I've never driven 2.5 hours just to see races before. As race fans say, "A bad day at the track beats a good day doing anything else", not that it was a bad day! I wish the frontstretch didn't have so much fencing because I couldn't get nice pictures of the cars racing. Otherwise the pictures turned out well. I didn't know that Kranar was a racing fan. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 14:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
529795 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529793 +++$+++ 529794 +++$+++ 2008-10-09 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.223588940E09 +++$+++ Yep, he sure is. Honestly, I like DeKalb, though I think Sycamore is more picturesque. There's some great architecture around here. I gave your article a copy edit, hopefully I didn't introduce any inaccuracies with my edits, give it a look. -- +++$+++ ::Yep, he sure is. Honestly, I like DeKalb, though I think Sycamore is more picturesque. There's some great architecture around here. I gave your article a copy edit, hopefully I didn't introduce any inaccuracies with my edits, give it a look. --[[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 14:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
529796 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529793 +++$+++ 529795 +++$+++ 2008-10-09 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.223589360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the copyedit - it's always a good thing! Your changes are improvements. While I did drive through Sycamore, I don't remember it. It was around 10 or 15 years ago. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Thanks for the copyedit - it's always a good thing! Your changes are improvements. While I did drive through Sycamore, I don't remember it. It was around 10 or 15 years ago. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 14:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

267651 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267651 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-12 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.200129840E09 +++$+++ -Is a requested article.  Do you think it's notable enough independent of [[hallucination]] for me to make it and it not be deleted as non-notable?  It's an interesting topic.  +++$+++ -Is a requested article.  Do you think it's notable enough independent of [[hallucination]] for me to make it and it not be deleted as non-notable?  It's an interesting topic. [[User:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="orange">Merkinsmum</font></b>]] 01:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
267652 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267651 +++$+++ 267651 +++$+++ 2008-01-12 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.200176760E09 +++$+++ It is certainly notable enough to be written about and explained. But looking at the [[Hallucination]] article, it seems like their way of handling various types of hallucinations is to describe them under a heading in the parent article. I looked under See also. Those articles to be larger topics. However, maybe there are all sorts of facts that you might dig up to justify an independent article.  If you want to write the article, write it. (Maybe it will grow.) Link it under See also. It seem to me the worse that could happen is a merge.   +++$+++ :It is certainly notable enough to be written about and explained. But looking at the [[Hallucination]] article, it seems like their way of handling various types of hallucinations is to describe them under a heading in the parent article. I looked under See also. Those articles to be larger topics. However, maybe there are all sorts of facts that you might dig up to justify an independent article.  If you want to write the article, write it. (Maybe it will grow.) Link it under See also. It seem to me the worse that could happen is a merge.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

5509 +++$+++ Aggiebean +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5509 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-24 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.245903420E09 +++$+++ I still agree with Finneganw on this, I don't think we can get into details w\/o fighting. How about you write a sandbox version of what you're talking about and submit it for our approval? Maybe we're not as far apart as we think? +++$+++ I still agree with Finneganw on this, I don't think we can get into details w/o fighting. How about you write a sandbox version of what you're talking about and submit it for our approval? Maybe we're not as far apart as we think?[[User:Aggiebean|Aggiebean]] ([[User talk:Aggiebean|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
5510 +++$+++ 76.195.93.15 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5509 +++$+++ 5509 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.246575300E09 +++$+++ Yes, Bookworm, did you do your homework for the SS to approve yet? I cannot believe aggiebean, but just remember Bookworm, she does not own that page. Either we edit or we don't...but please don't let her bullying chase you away![[Special:Contributions\/76.195.93.15|76.195.93.15]] ( +++$+++ :Yes, Bookworm, did you do your homework for the SS to approve yet? I cannot believe aggiebean, but just remember Bookworm, she does not own that page. Either we edit or we don't...but please don't let her bullying chase you away![[Special:Contributions/76.195.93.15|76.195.93.15]] ([[User talk:76.195.93.15|talk]]) 15:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
5511 +++$+++ 76.195.83.199 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5509 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-09 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.247185800E09 +++$+++ OK, hopefully this is rescue time. Please bookie, go contact [[User Talk:Gwen Gale]]. There's someone with a half a brain or better! Working to make the page what it should be, and GG thinks like you and I do![[Special:Contributions\/76.195.83.199|76.195.83.199]] ( +++$+++ ***OK, hopefully this is rescue time. Please bookie, go contact [[User Talk:Gwen Gale]]. There's someone with a half a brain or better! Working to make the page what it should be, and GG thinks like you and I do![[Special:Contributions/76.195.83.199|76.195.83.199]] ([[User talk:76.195.83.199|talk]]) 17:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

267655 +++$+++ Jeffpw +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-12 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.200182160E09 +++$+++ I am a bit confused at your diffs. You wrote \"Here are diffs showing contact between SlimVirgin and Zeraeph before the block\",  but the diffs you provided were from December 29th, after SV had unblocked her. Am I missing something?  +++$+++ I am a bit confused at your diffs. You wrote "Here are diffs showing contact between SlimVirgin and Zeraeph before the block",  but the diffs you provided were from December 29th, after SV had unblocked her. Am I missing something? [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] ([[User talk:Jeffpw|talk]]) 15:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
267656 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267655 +++$+++ 267655 +++$+++ 2008-01-12 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.200182880E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry. I was not thinking, I guess. You are undoubtedly right. I wasn't paying all that much attention at the time this was happening so I don't have the time line nailed down. Should I remove that post? Or do you want to make a statement under it? Or should I? Sorry,   +++$+++ :I'm sorry. I was not thinking, I guess. You are undoubtedly right. I wasn't paying all that much attention at the time this was happening so I don't have the time line nailed down. Should I remove that post? Or do you want to make a statement under it? Or should I? Sorry,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 16:08, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
267657 +++$+++ Jeffpw +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267655 +++$+++ 267656 +++$+++ 2008-01-12 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.200184260E09 +++$+++ LOL. No problem. Being human gives you the right to make an occasional error. :-P If I were you, I would just remove it, and give your reason in the edit summary. I guarantee you Wikipedia will keep on humming in spite of the occasional misbegotten post.  +++$+++ ::LOL. No problem. Being human gives you the right to make an occasional error. :-P If I were you, I would just remove it, and give your reason in the edit summary. I guarantee you Wikipedia will keep on humming in spite of the occasional misbegotten post. [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] ([[User talk:Jeffpw|talk]]) 16:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

5512 +++$+++ Pokerdance +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5512 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-13 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.247544000E09 +++$+++ Hi, may I ask why you re-added the picture of Miley Cyrus on [[Miley (given name)]]? I provided a good reason for removing it, and if you didn't see it, it was because the article is about the name and not her. ''' +++$+++ Hi, may I ask why you re-added the picture of Miley Cyrus on [[Miley (given name)]]? I provided a good reason for removing it, and if you didn't see it, it was because the article is about the name and not her. '''[[User:Pokerdance|Pokerdance]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:Pokerdance|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Pokerdance|contribs]])</sup> 21:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
5513 +++$+++ Pokerdance +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5512 +++$+++ 5512 +++$+++ 2009-07-14 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.247559360E09 +++$+++ With that logic, I guess it's safe to say that we can put a picture of Emma Watson on the page for the name Emma. Or a picture of Anne Hathaway on the page for the name Anne. You make no sense. It does not matter that Miley popularized the name, she does not represent girls who are given that name, and the picture does not need to be there. ''' +++$+++ :With that logic, I guess it's safe to say that we can put a picture of Emma Watson on the page for the name Emma. Or a picture of Anne Hathaway on the page for the name Anne. You make no sense. It does not matter that Miley popularized the name, she does not represent girls who are given that name, and the picture does not need to be there. '''[[User:Pokerdance|Pokerdance]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:Pokerdance|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Pokerdance|contribs]])</sup> 01:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

612588 +++$+++ Mais oui! +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612588 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-17 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.171731240E09 +++$+++ Please contribute you thoughts at the relevant Talk item I started. -- +++$+++ Please contribute you thoughts at the relevant Talk item I started. --[[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] 08:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
612589 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612588 +++$+++ 612588 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.171732260E09 +++$+++ Was just thinking of doing so, will do..  +++$+++ :Was just thinking of doing so, will do.. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

267658 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.199274240E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I want to apologize for our interaction in December.  I can see now that I was impatient with you and spent too much time talking rather than listening to what you had to say.  I've been going over your past discussions with other editors, and even though we are a product of different generations separated by time, I hope we can bridge that gap and learn from each other in the new year. &mdash; +++$+++ Hi.  I want to apologize for our interaction in December.  I can see now that I was impatient with you and spent too much time talking rather than listening to what you had to say.  I've been going over your past discussions with other editors, and even though we are a product of different generations separated by time, I hope we can bridge that gap and learn from each other in the new year. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 03:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
267659 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 2008-01-04 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.199510400E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the apology. I appreciate that you took time to look into my history. Currently I am embroiled in another issue that is another outcome of the [[Scarlet Letter]] I talked to you about before. So again I thank you. Regards,   +++$+++ :Thank you for the apology. I appreciate that you took time to look into my history. Currently I am embroiled in another issue that is another outcome of the [[Scarlet Letter]] I talked to you about before. So again I thank you. Regards,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 21:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
267660 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 267659 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.199984220E09 +++$+++ I would like to help you get the sock puppet category removed.  From what I understand, it is possible to request it.  Would you be interested in helping me do that?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::I would like to help you get the sock puppet category removed.  From what I understand, it is possible to request it.  Would you be interested in helping me do that?  &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 08:57, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
267661 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 267660 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.200001980E09 +++$+++ Yes. Thank you! If that is possible, it would be wonderful and save me infinite future grief. I would be very grateful to you if that could be accomplished.  +++$+++ :::Yes. Thank you! If that is possible, it would be wonderful and save me infinite future grief. I would be very grateful to you if that could be accomplished. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
267662 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 267661 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.200039720E09 +++$+++ The first thing I will need is all the relevant documentation.  Please send me the links by e-mail (click e-mail this user) or if you prefer, leave them on my talk page.  This would include links to arbcom cases, checkuser requests, etc.  This is simply so that I have all the necessary information to make the request. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::The first thing I will need is all the relevant documentation.  Please send me the links by e-mail (click e-mail this user) or if you prefer, leave them on my talk page.  This would include links to arbcom cases, checkuser requests, etc.  This is simply so that I have all the necessary information to make the request. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 00:22, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
267663 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.200049560E09 +++$+++ If I wanted to find the \"granny defense\" where would I look? &mdash; +++$+++ :If I wanted to find the "granny defense" where would I look? &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 03:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
267664 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 267663 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.200048900E09 +++$+++ P.S. The grany defense:[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABostonMA&diff=92729409&oldid=92723030] from link found on [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Mattisse (4th)]].  +++$+++ ::P.S. The grany defense:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABostonMA&diff=92729409&oldid=92723030] from link found on [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mattisse (4th)]]. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 02:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
267665 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 267664 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.200049980E09 +++$+++ I need to ask you some questions.  Is it ok to send you e-mail, or should I ask them here? &mdash; +++$+++ :::I need to ask you some questions.  Is it ok to send you e-mail, or should I ask them here? &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 03:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
267666 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 267665 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.200085560E09 +++$+++ O.K. to send email.   +++$+++ ::::O.K. to send email.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
267667 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.200103800E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Louis_Martinie%27] is example sock puppet tags put on many talk page articles that are still there.   +++$+++ *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Louis_Martinie%27] is example sock puppet tags put on many talk page articles that are still there.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
267668 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267658 +++$+++ 267667 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.200436080E09 +++$+++ Message received.  I look forward to working with you too.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Message received.  I look forward to working with you too.  &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 14:28, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

5515 +++$+++ Certes +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-01 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.249175760E09 +++$+++ Whilst [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_most_popular_given_names&diff=305492512&oldid=305483310 reverting] an unwelcome new addition, I noticed that the [http:\/\/www.islamonline.net\/English\/News\/2006-01\/29\/article04.shtml quoted source] does not mention the names you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_most_popular_given_names&diff=prev&oldid=190885728 added] either, implying only that [[Muhammad]] was the most popular male name in Tunisia.  As a major contributor you obviously know what you're doing, so I haven't changed your contributions.  Could the source have changed?  +++$+++ Whilst [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_most_popular_given_names&diff=305492512&oldid=305483310 reverting] an unwelcome new addition, I noticed that the [http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2006-01/29/article04.shtml quoted source] does not mention the names you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_most_popular_given_names&diff=prev&oldid=190885728 added] either, implying only that [[Muhammad]] was the most popular male name in Tunisia.  As a major contributor you obviously know what you're doing, so I haven't changed your contributions.  Could the source have changed? [[User:Certes|Certes]] ([[User talk:Certes|talk]]) 18:16, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
5516 +++$+++ Certes +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5515 +++$+++ 5515 +++$+++ 2009-08-01 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.249180500E09 +++$+++ As you [[User_talk:Certes#Tunisian_names|suggested]], I have tagged the list as ''source needed''.  Thank you.  +++$+++ :As you [[User_talk:Certes#Tunisian_names|suggested]], I have tagged the list as ''source needed''.  Thank you. [[User:Certes|Certes]] ([[User talk:Certes|talk]]) 19:35, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

529804 +++$+++ Capitalismojo +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529804 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-13 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.223949120E09 +++$+++ I don't understand your splitting of the 'town of Laona' from the 'unincorporated community of Laona'.  The town is unincorporated, true, but there is not a town that has a separate existence from the community. They are one and the same. Perhaps I am missing something.  +++$+++ I don't understand your splitting of the 'town of Laona' from the 'unincorporated community of Laona'.  The town is unincorporated, true, but there is not a town that has a separate existence from the community. They are one and the same. Perhaps I am missing something. [[User:Capitalismojo|Capitalismojo]] ([[User talk:Capitalismojo|talk]]) 18:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
529805 +++$+++ Capitalismojo +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529804 +++$+++ 529804 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.223949840E09 +++$+++ The upshot is I think it is confusing and innaccurate to keep this split.  +++$+++ :The upshot is I think it is confusing and innaccurate to keep this split. [[User:Capitalismojo|Capitalismojo]] ([[User talk:Capitalismojo|talk]]) 19:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
529806 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529804 +++$+++ 529805 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.223950380E09 +++$+++ Since the content was specific to the collection of houses and not the entire town, I decided to split it into the new article. I used my best judgment for which place(s) to put all of the content. Some of it would might to the whole town if you want to put ''some'' of it back. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Since the content was specific to the collection of houses and not the entire town, I decided to split it into the new article. I used my best judgment for which place(s) to put all of the content. Some of it would might to the whole town if you want to put ''some'' of it back. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 19:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
529807 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529804 +++$+++ 529806 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.223951040E09 +++$+++ Check out [[Template:Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin]]. See how there are both town and unincorporated community articles for Taycheedah. Also see that the unincorporated community of [[Peebles, Wisconsin]] is located within the town of [[Taycheedah, Wisconsin]], and that it is a nearby community to [[Taycheedah (community), Wisconsin]]. There are many other examples of this happening in various situations throughout the state. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Check out [[Template:Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin]]. See how there are both town and unincorporated community articles for Taycheedah. Also see that the unincorporated community of [[Peebles, Wisconsin]] is located within the town of [[Taycheedah, Wisconsin]], and that it is a nearby community to [[Taycheedah (community), Wisconsin]]. There are many other examples of this happening in various situations throughout the state. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 19:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
529808 +++$+++ Capitalismojo +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529804 +++$+++ 529807 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.223952540E09 +++$+++ Excellent! Thank you for your thoughtful response. As I am new to the Wisconsin project, I will go and study the discussions.  Two things occur to me after viewing the Fond du Lac County template. The first is that all or virtually all of the 'towns' listed in Forest County should be instead listed (or also listed) as unincorporated communities. The second is that unless a township has more than one unincorporated community, it probably doesn't make too much sense to double list once as township and once as an unincorporated community.  I won't make any changes untill I have studied the matter further and discussed it further. Thank you again.   +++$+++ ::::Excellent! Thank you for your thoughtful response. As I am new to the Wisconsin project, I will go and study the discussions.  Two things occur to me after viewing the Fond du Lac County template. The first is that all or virtually all of the 'towns' listed in Forest County should be instead listed (or also listed) as unincorporated communities. The second is that unless a township has more than one unincorporated community, it probably doesn't make too much sense to double list once as township and once as an unincorporated community.  I won't make any changes untill I have studied the matter further and discussed it further. Thank you again.  [[User:Capitalismojo|Capitalismojo]] ([[User talk:Capitalismojo|talk]]) 19:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
529809 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529804 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.223958300E09 +++$+++ Actually, what exists now are articles on the towns and no other articles on the unincorporated communities. Look at what's there right now, it's a bunch of automated census and geography information. So it would be the \"also listed\" option. Just don't create one sentence articles on these communities - there should be some substance to the article like location in the highway or river systems, etc. Lots of towns in Wisconsin took their names from small communities in their borders. As I said, we discussed towns vs. communities at WikiProject Wisconsin, and consensus determined that it is preferred to have separate articles on both rather than a merged article. That is, if someone wants to spend the time to develop an article about the community. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::Actually, what exists now are articles on the towns and no other articles on the unincorporated communities. Look at what's there right now, it's a bunch of automated census and geography information. So it would be the "also listed" option. Just don't create one sentence articles on these communities - there should be some substance to the article like location in the highway or river systems, etc. Lots of towns in Wisconsin took their names from small communities in their borders. As I said, we discussed towns vs. communities at WikiProject Wisconsin, and consensus determined that it is preferred to have separate articles on both rather than a merged article. That is, if someone wants to spend the time to develop an article about the community. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 21:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
529810 +++$+++ Capitalismojo +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529804 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.224733080E09 +++$+++ I have put some additional thought into this and posted it at WikiProject Wisconsin  in the Unincorporated Communities discussion. My comments have focussed on verifiability of the unincorporated communities.   +++$+++ :::::::I have put some additional thought into this and posted it at WikiProject Wisconsin  in the Unincorporated Communities discussion. My comments have focussed on verifiability of the unincorporated communities.  [[User:Capitalismojo|Capitalismojo]] ([[User talk:Capitalismojo|talk]]) 20:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

529811 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-13 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.223959500E09 +++$+++ Can you take a look at the [[Justin Allgaier]] article, and let me know if it is up to the requirements for a nomination of a DYK article?  I'd like to nominate it for that, with the hook \"DYK...that [[Justin Allgaier]] is the only [[ARCA RE\/MAX Series]] Champion since 2000 other than [[Frank Kimmel]].\"...or something along those lines.  Thanks, <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ Can you take a look at the [[Justin Allgaier]] article, and let me know if it is up to the requirements for a nomination of a DYK article?  I'd like to nominate it for that, with the hook "DYK...that [[Justin Allgaier]] is the only [[ARCA RE/MAX Series]] Champion since 2000 other than [[Frank Kimmel]]."...or something along those lines.  Thanks, <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 21:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
529812 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529811 +++$+++ 529811 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.223960160E09 +++$+++ Never mind.  About the only criterion that is applicable is that I expanded the article almost 10-fold, but not in the last 5 days. Sorry to bother you.  <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ : Never mind.  About the only criterion that is applicable is that I expanded the article almost 10-fold, but not in the last 5 days. Sorry to bother you.  <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 21:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

5525 +++$+++ RussianSpy +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5525 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-07 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.265575560E09 +++$+++ PS if you dont understand Russian language - i'll translate my message -- +++$+++ PS if you dont understand Russian language - i'll translate my message --[[User:RussianSpy|RussianSpy]] ([[User talk:RussianSpy|talk]]) 12:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
5526 +++$+++ RussianSpy +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5525 +++$+++ 5525 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.265606400E09 +++$+++ Why dont you want to hear me. I said that Marina is not a form of name Anna. And also i said that Marianna IS NOT Russian name. I live in Russia 27 years, I've read hundreds of books of Russian classics literature and and Russian history. And I've never heard any Russians named Marianna. What i have to do to prove my words??? -- +++$+++ : Why dont you want to hear me. I said that Marina is not a form of name Anna. And also i said that Marianna IS NOT Russian name. I live in Russia 27 years, I've read hundreds of books of Russian classics literature and and Russian history. And I've never heard any Russians named Marianna. What i have to do to prove my words??? --[[User:RussianSpy|RussianSpy]] ([[User talk:RussianSpy|talk]]) 21:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
5527 +++$+++ 75.21.144.84 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5525 +++$+++ 5525 +++$+++ 2010-02-15 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.266269700E09 +++$+++ Say, why did you leap in and try to make me look dopey re: the female form of surnames at Anna Anderson? You really think everyone in America knows this? You think the Olympics have to do with Anna Anderson?[[Special:Contributions\/75.21.144.84|75.21.144.84]] ( +++$+++ *Say, why did you leap in and try to make me look dopey re: the female form of surnames at Anna Anderson? You really think everyone in America knows this? You think the Olympics have to do with Anna Anderson?[[Special:Contributions/75.21.144.84|75.21.144.84]] ([[User talk:75.21.144.84|talk]]) 13:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

525209 +++$+++  +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Hello! Its me Engusz! All of the anatomy articles of the huwiki are from the enwiki which turn into hungarian. After this i put it to the right category. I see in lot of articales in the enwiki that it hasnt got right category. It has got only anatomy stubs. Why? And the enwiki's anatomy navigation temples havent got all the articles which are rate there. [http:\/\/hu.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sablon:A_fej_izmai| muscles of the head in huwiki] huwiki 75 > enwiki 63 (I calculated fast so maybe the numbers incorrects)[http:\/\/hu.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Engusz| Engusz] Thursday 01.02.2006. 23:07 (UTC) +++$+++ Hello! Its me Engusz! All of the anatomy articles of the huwiki are from the enwiki which turn into hungarian. After this i put it to the right category. I see in lot of articales in the enwiki that it hasnt got right category. It has got only anatomy stubs. Why? And the enwiki's anatomy navigation temples havent got all the articles which are rate there. [http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sablon:A_fej_izmai| muscles of the head in huwiki] huwiki 75 > enwiki 63 (I calculated fast so maybe the numbers incorrects)[http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Engusz| Engusz] Thursday 01.02.2006. 23:07 (UTC)
525210 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525209 +++$+++ 525209 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.170514860E09 +++$+++ Thank you for all your work. I've updated the English pages with your images from Commons. I agree that the categorization of enwiki's anatomy articles isn't where it should be; hopefully that will improve in the coming year. Thanks again! -- +++$+++ :Thank you for all your work. I've updated the English pages with your images from Commons. I agree that the categorization of enwiki's anatomy articles isn't where it should be; hopefully that will improve in the coming year. Thanks again! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 07:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

5528 +++$+++ 76.195.83.61 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-19 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.266617160E09 +++$+++ I have to agree with the owner of this page here, Bookworm. I know you've had your fights and you're a tough scrapper--I admire. Here, however, I think you ought not throw into people's faces that you are allegedly some kind of expert in Russian language and history. You have an abrasive way of stating things that you think may be correct. This Mariana issue is one of them. I'd say YOU'D best leave this issue alone--you are beginning to remind me of Aggiebean!76.195.83.61 (talk) 14:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)\"[[Special:Contributions\/76.195.83.61|76.195.83.61]] ( +++$+++ I have to agree with the owner of this page here, Bookworm. I know you've had your fights and you're a tough scrapper--I admire. Here, however, I think you ought not throw into people's faces that you are allegedly some kind of expert in Russian language and history. You have an abrasive way of stating things that you think may be correct. This Mariana issue is one of them. I'd say YOU'D best leave this issue alone--you are beginning to remind me of Aggiebean!76.195.83.61 (talk) 14:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)"[[Special:Contributions/76.195.83.61|76.195.83.61]] ([[User talk:76.195.83.61|talk]]) 14:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
5529 +++$+++ 76.195.83.61 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5528 +++$+++ 5528 +++$+++ 2010-02-19 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.266620700E09 +++$+++ OK, so I'm hopping back in here to give YOU a linguistic lesson. We know MARIA was used by Palestinian Jews for centuries. The name is found on ossuaries and in tombs, we presume it is a Hellenic import. In its most popular form among Jews it was MARIANTHE or MARIAMNE. ANNA is a Hebrew name (Hannah)--yet we never see nor do we know at all of a Hebrew combination like MARI-HANNAH; the closest we have is MARIAMNE, which is a name found on an ossuary dating to the A.D. 1st century. You see, this tells us nothing of the Russian tradition centuries later, only that Russians may or may not have adopted the name...clearly they have no problem with the name MARIA (''as a Christian rather than Russian name'') or ANNA, though they cannot rightly be called Russian names. Yet you seem to be telling this poor slob that Mariana (Marianna) ''is'' Russian. That is sloppy work, Bookie![[Special:Contributions\/76.195.83.61|76.195.83.61]] ( +++$+++ *OK, so I'm hopping back in here to give YOU a linguistic lesson. We know MARIA was used by Palestinian Jews for centuries. The name is found on ossuaries and in tombs, we presume it is a Hellenic import. In its most popular form among Jews it was MARIANTHE or MARIAMNE. ANNA is a Hebrew name (Hannah)--yet we never see nor do we know at all of a Hebrew combination like MARI-HANNAH; the closest we have is MARIAMNE, which is a name found on an ossuary dating to the A.D. 1st century. You see, this tells us nothing of the Russian tradition centuries later, only that Russians may or may not have adopted the name...clearly they have no problem with the name MARIA (''as a Christian rather than Russian name'') or ANNA, though they cannot rightly be called Russian names. Yet you seem to be telling this poor slob that Mariana (Marianna) ''is'' Russian. That is sloppy work, Bookie![[Special:Contributions/76.195.83.61|76.195.83.61]] ([[User talk:76.195.83.61|talk]]) 15:05, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
5530 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5528 +++$+++ 5529 +++$+++ 2010-02-19 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.266626040E09 +++$+++ I'm not interested in getting into a debate with you, but for the record Marianna is in use as a rare name in Russia and other Slavic countries, as I explained to this fellow. The language of origin is Hebrew via Latin and Greek. There are variants of Miriam and Anna in nearly every language because Christianity is so widespread. Calling it Russian isn't saying that's the language of origin but one of the countries it is used in. -- +++$+++ ::I'm not interested in getting into a debate with you, but for the record Marianna is in use as a rare name in Russia and other Slavic countries, as I explained to this fellow. The language of origin is Hebrew via Latin and Greek. There are variants of Miriam and Anna in nearly every language because Christianity is so widespread. Calling it Russian isn't saying that's the language of origin but one of the countries it is used in. --[[User:Bookworm857158367|Bookworm857158367]] ([[User talk:Bookworm857158367#top|talk]]) 16:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
5531 +++$+++ 76.195.83.61 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5528 +++$+++ 5528 +++$+++ 2010-02-23 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.266979560E09 +++$+++ OK, I'm also not interested in debates because I deal in facts, which I outlined to you very clearly. Therefore I hardly need you to repeat back to me the facts I initially raised here. Secondly, I agree with your wording above, so why did you give that Russian spy person such a hard time? You could have said the same words to him. But you held his feet to the fire. I mean, are you Russian? Are you a linguist as I am? Have you dwelt in Russia? You should go easy on the arrogance, this place is getting to you as it does to all of us![[Special:Contributions\/76.195.83.61|76.195.83.61]] ( +++$+++ *OK, I'm also not interested in debates because I deal in facts, which I outlined to you very clearly. Therefore I hardly need you to repeat back to me the facts I initially raised here. Secondly, I agree with your wording above, so why did you give that Russian spy person such a hard time? You could have said the same words to him. But you held his feet to the fire. I mean, are you Russian? Are you a linguist as I am? Have you dwelt in Russia? You should go easy on the arrogance, this place is getting to you as it does to all of us![[Special:Contributions/76.195.83.61|76.195.83.61]] ([[User talk:76.195.83.61|talk]]) 18:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
5532 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5528 +++$+++ 5531 +++$+++ 2010-02-24 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.267001580E09 +++$+++ Not interested in continuing this. I provided a reference and explained why I refused to remove that variant of Mary from the list. If you have other resources that would add to the Mary article, by all means do so. -- +++$+++ **Not interested in continuing this. I provided a reference and explained why I refused to remove that variant of Mary from the list. If you have other resources that would add to the Mary article, by all means do so. --[[User:Bookworm857158367|Bookworm857158367]] ([[User talk:Bookworm857158367#top|talk]]) 00:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

267674 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-18 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.200650520E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 02:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
267675 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267674 +++$+++ 267674 +++$+++ 2008-01-18 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.200689400E09 +++$+++ That the article has a tag on it is meant to inspire those who go to the page to start building up the citation base. Any Wikipedia article should not depend on one person for its development. Others can supply citations you can not. Wikipedia is a community project. Remember though, information that is not cited is vulnerable to removal or alteration by any editor, per Wikipedia policy.  Regards,  +++$+++ :That the article has a tag on it is meant to inspire those who go to the page to start building up the citation base. Any Wikipedia article should not depend on one person for its development. Others can supply citations you can not. Wikipedia is a community project. Remember though, information that is not cited is vulnerable to removal or alteration by any editor, per Wikipedia policy.  Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 12:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
267676 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267674 +++$+++ 267675 +++$+++ 2008-01-19 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.200759420E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I must really do some tracking down of sources. Sometimes it's more easy than others.  +++$+++ ::Thanks! I must really do some tracking down of sources. Sometimes it's more easy than others. [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 08:17, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

267677 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267677 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-18 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.200704580E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 17:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
267678 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267677 +++$+++ 267677 +++$+++ 2008-01-18 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.200704820E09 +++$+++ I should get it soon.  +++$+++ :I should get it soon. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
267679 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267677 +++$+++ 267678 +++$+++ 2008-01-18 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.200715020E09 +++$+++ I am taking my CEU courses for my license renewal. I am reading that delirium is associated with the dying phases of cancer and other illnesses. Do you know the percentage of patients experiencing delirium in the hours to days before their death?   +++$+++ ::I am taking my CEU courses for my license renewal. I am reading that delirium is associated with the dying phases of cancer and other illnesses. Do you know the percentage of patients experiencing delirium in the hours to days before their death?  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:57, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
267680 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267677 +++$+++ 267679 +++$+++ 2008-01-19 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.200782460E09 +++$+++ I am not sure at this moment. +++$+++ ::: I am not sure at this moment.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 14:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
267681 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267677 +++$+++ 267677 +++$+++ 2008-01-22 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.200989520E09 +++$+++ What is my connection to ACE? I have less connection than you. I do not know anything about the subject matter as you do and do not edit related articles. My original involvement was putting <nowiki>{{Fact}}<\/nowiki> tages on Starwood articles, hence the sockpuppets who pursued me for six months. I was caught up in the Starwood arbitration because of the sock puppets, but the ArbCon found no problem  with my behavior. I do not edit articles that are even peripherally connected with the subject matter of Starwood unlike you,  at least not knowingly as it is not a subject matter that interests me at all.  I do not get where you are coming from.  I voted for you for admin happily, so I am totally  surprised at this reaction from you now. Rather, you should stay away from Starwood, it seems to me as there is overlap in your interest areas and Rosencomet's .  Regards,  +++$+++ :What is my connection to ACE? I have less connection than you. I do not know anything about the subject matter as you do and do not edit related articles. My original involvement was putting <nowiki>{{Fact}}</nowiki> tages on Starwood articles, hence the sockpuppets who pursued me for six months. I was caught up in the Starwood arbitration because of the sock puppets, but the ArbCon found no problem  with my behavior. I do not edit articles that are even peripherally connected with the subject matter of Starwood unlike you,  at least not knowingly as it is not a subject matter that interests me at all.  I do not get where you are coming from.  I voted for you for admin happily, so I am totally  surprised at this reaction from you now. Rather, you should stay away from Starwood, it seems to me as there is overlap in your interest areas and Rosencomet's .  Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 00:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

44613 +++$+++ Salvio giuliano +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44613 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-05 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.302041700E09 +++$+++ Hello SummerPhD. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of [[:Lyxor Asset Management]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7.'''  Thank you.  <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml\">  ''' +++$+++ Hello SummerPhD. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of [[:Lyxor Asset Management]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7.'''  Thank you.  <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">  '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> [[User talk:Salvio giuliano| <sup>Let's talk about it!</sup>]] 15:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
44614 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44613 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-29 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.304070480E09 +++$+++ Oh... oh my god no... anything but that... I feel so... so positively ''wounded'' by the lonely guy making tit jokes on Wikipedia. Now I must cry. -  +++$+++ ::Oh... oh my god no... anything but that... I feel so... so positively ''wounded'' by the lonely guy making tit jokes on Wikipedia. Now I must cry. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 02:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

529824 +++$+++ Mailer diablo +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529824 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-17 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.224287760E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> Thank you for your contributions! - ''Cheers'',  +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> Thank you for your contributions! - ''Cheers'', [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 16:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
529825 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529824 +++$+++ 529824 +++$+++ 2008-10-17 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.224287940E09 +++$+++ He he! I was just asking for someone else to credit me for this one after I flipped the group, and I see that you took care of ''all'' of the crediting. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :He he! I was just asking for someone else to credit me for this one after I flipped the group, and I see that you took care of ''all'' of the crediting. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 16:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
529826 +++$+++ Mailer diablo +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529824 +++$+++ 529824 +++$+++ 2008-10-17 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.224288060E09 +++$+++ ;) - ''Cheers'',  +++$+++ : ;) - ''Cheers'', [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 17:01, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

267682 +++$+++ Kathryn_NicDhàna +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-22 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.200990540E09 +++$+++ Oh dear, no, Mattisse, you misunderstood. I am sorry if it wasn't clear. I meant it would be best if you made the changes to the article, ''because'' you have no connection to ACE. I meant that any of us who have no connection to ACE should do the changes, instead of Rosenbaum. I am sorry for the misunderstanding. Is that clear? I'm sorry to have unintentionally caused you distress. - <font face=\"comic sans ms\"><b> +++$+++ Oh dear, no, Mattisse, you misunderstood. I am sorry if it wasn't clear. I meant it would be best if you made the changes to the article, ''because'' you have no connection to ACE. I meant that any of us who have no connection to ACE should do the changes, instead of Rosenbaum. I am sorry for the misunderstanding. Is that clear? I'm sorry to have unintentionally caused you distress. - <font face="comic sans ms"><b>[[User:Kathryn NicDhàna|<span style="color:#009">Kathryn NicDhàna</span>]]</b> [[User_talk:Kathryn NicDhàna|♫]]<font color="navy">♦</font>[[Special:Contributions/Kathryn_NicDhàna|♫]]</font> 00:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
267683 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267682 +++$+++ 267682 +++$+++ 2008-01-22 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.200991020E09 +++$+++ I am not interested in the articles or the subject matter. Rosencomet still holds me responsible for everything (as evinced by a recent dialog in which you entered involving Vitiras over Rosencommet -- and I truly thank you for that). I would be a fool to do the type of editing you are suggesting. I am not in the mood to ask for trouble. Sincerely,   +++$+++ :I am not interested in the articles or the subject matter. Rosencomet still holds me responsible for everything (as evinced by a recent dialog in which you entered involving Vitiras over Rosencommet -- and I truly thank you for that). I would be a fool to do the type of editing you are suggesting. I am not in the mood to ask for trouble. Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 00:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

529827 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529827 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-17 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.224296520E09 +++$+++ All I have is a single sentence....just about him being born in 1960, and being from Springfield.  The rest is just links to info on him (I think one of them is one of the ones you gave me). I've been wanting to do it for a while, but I just didn't have the motivation, nor the early history on him.  I can upload the pic, no problem, if you want to go ahead and write the article.  <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ All I have is a single sentence....just about him being born in 1960, and being from Springfield.  The rest is just links to info on him (I think one of them is one of the ones you gave me). I've been wanting to do it for a while, but I just didn't have the motivation, nor the early history on him.  I can upload the pic, no problem, if you want to go ahead and write the article.  <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 19:22, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
529828 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529827 +++$+++ 529827 +++$+++ 2008-10-17 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.224307080E09 +++$+++ Whoops...forgot to sign a bit ago... but, anyway, I was messing with my [[User:JLG 2701\/tw|Tim Wilkerson]] page, intending to do just a little (add an infobox, tidbits here and there, etc), and before I knew it, I had almost a full-blown page....mostly just stats.  Check it out, and put your spin on it. <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ :Whoops...forgot to sign a bit ago... but, anyway, I was messing with my [[User:JLG 2701/tw|Tim Wilkerson]] page, intending to do just a little (add an infobox, tidbits here and there, etc), and before I knew it, I had almost a full-blown page....mostly just stats.  Check it out, and put your spin on it. <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 22:18, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
529829 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529827 +++$+++ 529828 +++$+++ 2008-11-09 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.226233020E09 +++$+++ I wikified that article, but I will need some time to source it.  I also added the infobox I had on my page, so it looks a little more presentable.  I'm also going to add an external links section.  If it's ok, I will take down the deadend tag that's on the page since it now has links to other pages. <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ ::I wikified that article, but I will need some time to source it.  I also added the infobox I had on my page, so it looks a little more presentable.  I'm also going to add an external links section.  If it's ok, I will take down the deadend tag that's on the page since it now has links to other pages. <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 04:17, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

267684 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-23 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.201075560E09 +++$+++ I was flicking through random articles and thought this could be sooo much better and more in-depth.  And I thought of you lol, don't know if it's one you fancy doing something with.  +++$+++ I was flicking through random articles and thought this could be sooo much better and more in-depth.  And I thought of you lol, don't know if it's one you fancy doing something with. [[User:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="orange">Merkinsmum</font></b>]] 00:06, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
267685 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267684 +++$+++ 267684 +++$+++ 2008-01-23 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.201158240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the suggestion but  I'm rather burned out on Psychology articles. They so easily become controversial!  +++$+++ :Thanks for the suggestion but  I'm rather burned out on Psychology articles. They so easily become controversial! [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 23:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

267686 +++$+++ Grunty Thraveswain +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-23 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.201154220E09 +++$+++ Would you mind at all if I moved the title of the piece to just \"Beifudi site\"? I think that just using the site name might be better and fit with the precedence for most archaeological site articles. Alternatively, check out [[Toro (archaeological site)]]. What do you think about the name of the Beifudi article?  +++$+++ Would you mind at all if I moved the title of the piece to just "Beifudi site"? I think that just using the site name might be better and fit with the precedence for most archaeological site articles. Alternatively, check out [[Toro (archaeological site)]]. What do you think about the name of the Beifudi article? [[User:Grunty Thraveswain|Grunty Thraveswain]] ([[User talk:Grunty Thraveswain|talk]]) 21:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
267687 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267686 +++$+++ 267686 +++$+++ 2008-01-23 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.201154700E09 +++$+++ If that would be a better name for it, feel free, especially if a renaming would allow it to fit in with other such sites about China. Regards,  +++$+++ :If that would be a better name for it, feel free, especially if a renaming would allow it to fit in with other such sites about China. Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 22:05, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

267688 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-25 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.201297320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 13:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
267689 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267688 +++$+++ 267688 +++$+++ 2008-01-25 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.201298280E09 +++$+++ Do you have an email address that always works?   +++$+++ :Do you have an email address that always works?  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

267690 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-25 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.201298460E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 14:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
267691 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267690 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-25 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.201298580E09 +++$+++ O.K. I will try to explain.   +++$+++ :::O.K. I will try to explain.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
267692 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267690 +++$+++ 267690 +++$+++ 2008-01-25 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.201314540E09 +++$+++ Sorry! I looked at the external link and could not make much sense out of it.   +++$+++ :Sorry! I looked at the external link and could not make much sense out of it.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

568903 +++$+++ Khukri +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-05 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.160110440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that permanent block, much appreciated.  +++$+++ Thanks for that permanent block, much appreciated. [[User:Khukri|'''Khukri''']]  <sup>([[User_talk:Khukri|'''<font face="verdana">talk</font>''']] . [[Special:Contributions/Khukri|'''<font face="verdana">contribs</font>''']])</sup> 21:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
568904 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568903 +++$+++ 568903 +++$+++ 2006-10-06 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.160146200E09 +++$+++ First, sign your Talk comments with four tildes, <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>.  Second, you have to provide a link to the article in question or at least give me the name in order to understand what the request for comment is about.  +++$+++ :First, sign your Talk comments with four tildes, <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.  Second, you have to provide a link to the article in question or at least give me the name in order to understand what the request for comment is about. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 07:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
568905 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568903 +++$+++ 568903 +++$+++ 2006-10-06 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.160146560E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Imransiddiqui]] - this is the article in question, yes?  I have taken a look at the deleted content and I don't think that there is any way that it can be saved.  Please read [[Wikipedia:Your first article]] and [[Help:Starting a new page]].  Be aware that articles should be sourced and referenced and not contain any [[WP:NOR|original research]] on your part. The speedily deleted article above fell foul in all of these areas.  +++$+++ :[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imransiddiqui]] - this is the article in question, yes?  I have taken a look at the deleted content and I don't think that there is any way that it can be saved.  Please read [[Wikipedia:Your first article]] and [[Help:Starting a new page]].  Be aware that articles should be sourced and referenced and not contain any [[WP:NOR|original research]] on your part. The speedily deleted article above fell foul in all of these areas. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 07:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

5549 +++$+++ Languagehat +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-18 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.287458040E09 +++$+++ What the hell? I put a lot of work into that article. If you have a problem with some particular change, let me know by all means, but reverting the whole thing as if it were vandalism is crappy behavior. I'd revert it back, but I don't want to get into an edit war, so I'm giving you a chance to explain what you had in mind in the hopes that we can come to a mutually acceptable compromise.  What could you possibly have against my adding the Arabic original?  Also, the article is about the ''name'', and all that stuff about meditation and amulets is completely irrelevant and should go.  +++$+++ What the hell? I put a lot of work into that article. If you have a problem with some particular change, let me know by all means, but reverting the whole thing as if it were vandalism is crappy behavior. I'd revert it back, but I don't want to get into an edit war, so I'm giving you a chance to explain what you had in mind in the hopes that we can come to a mutually acceptable compromise.  What could you possibly have against my adding the Arabic original?  Also, the article is about the ''name'', and all that stuff about meditation and amulets is completely irrelevant and should go. [[User:Languagehat|Languagehat]] ([[User talk:Languagehat|talk]]) 20:14, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
5550 +++$+++ Languagehat +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5549 +++$+++ 5549 +++$+++ 2010-10-21 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.287729060E09 +++$+++ I just saw you reverted your reversion.  Thanks, I appreciate that. Sorry I was so snippy in my previous message, but I hope you can understand my annoyance.  +++$+++ :I just saw you reverted your reversion.  Thanks, I appreciate that. Sorry I was so snippy in my previous message, but I hope you can understand my annoyance. [[User:Languagehat|Languagehat]] ([[User talk:Languagehat|talk]]) 23:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

529839 +++$+++ Calindreams +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-23 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.224774480E09 +++$+++ I've looked at various sites and the best thing I can find is that Crossrhythms says he is a pioneer in contemporary worship music, but like you have said, it is just asserted rather than proven. Apologies for the slander comment -it was my awful attempt at a joke. +++$+++ I've looked at various sites and the best thing I can find is that Crossrhythms says he is a pioneer in contemporary worship music, but like you have said, it is just asserted rather than proven. Apologies for the slander comment -it was my awful attempt at a joke.[[User:Calindreams|Calindreams]] ([[User talk:Calindreams|talk]]) 08:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
529840 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529839 +++$+++ 529839 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.224790860E09 +++$+++ You got me to chuckle about it now! If someone says that he's a pioneer, then there's probably enough reliably sourced content to prove notability. There was already one! I added All Music which is widely considered reliable on Wikipedia. Most other websites at google look like they're trying to see his CDs, so they're not reliable. [http:\/\/www.jesusfreakhideout.com\/Interviews\/HawkNelson2005.asp This] might be enough to prove that Hawk Nelson was inspired by him. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :You got me to chuckle about it now! If someone says that he's a pioneer, then there's probably enough reliably sourced content to prove notability. There was already one! I added All Music which is widely considered reliable on Wikipedia. Most other websites at google look like they're trying to see his CDs, so they're not reliable. [http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/Interviews/HawkNelson2005.asp This] might be enough to prove that Hawk Nelson was inspired by him. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

5553 +++$+++ 90.215.164.30 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5553 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.289969040E09 +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of [[Special:Contributions\/90.215.164.30|your recent edits]], such as the one you made to [[:Giulia de' Medici]], did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee\/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [[Special:Contributions\/90.215.164.30|90.215.164.30]] ( +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of [[Special:Contributions/90.215.164.30|your recent edits]], such as the one you made to [[:Giulia de' Medici]], did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/90.215.164.30|90.215.164.30]] ([[User talk:90.215.164.30|talk]]) 20:44, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
5554 +++$+++ 90.215.164.30 +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5553 +++$+++ 5553 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.289969040E09 +++$+++ Don't know if you have a dog in this fight, or whether you're just one of those lily-livered liberal revisionists who like to tinker with history to try and fit it to your whims. However, the mother of [[Alessandro de' Medici, Duke of Florence]] was a Moorish servant girl in Rome (ie - Berber or Arab from North Africa, not a \"Black African\"). Aside from that category being incorrect, it is highly unencyclopedic to begin an articl, such as [[Giulia de' Medici]], with \"possibily biracial\" (that her grandmother was Moorish is trivia). Even people who are actually bi-racial such as [[Barack Obama]] do not have \"Barack Obama is the, biracial, President of the United States\". - [[Special:Contributions\/90.215.164.30|90.215.164.30]] ( +++$+++ :Don't know if you have a dog in this fight, or whether you're just one of those lily-livered liberal revisionists who like to tinker with history to try and fit it to your whims. However, the mother of [[Alessandro de' Medici, Duke of Florence]] was a Moorish servant girl in Rome (ie - Berber or Arab from North Africa, not a "Black African"). Aside from that category being incorrect, it is highly unencyclopedic to begin an articl, such as [[Giulia de' Medici]], with "possibily biracial" (that her grandmother was Moorish is trivia). Even people who are actually bi-racial such as [[Barack Obama]] do not have "Barack Obama is the, biracial, President of the United States". - [[Special:Contributions/90.215.164.30|90.215.164.30]] ([[User talk:90.215.164.30|talk]]) 20:44, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
5555 +++$+++ Kenilworth Terrace +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5553 +++$+++ 5554 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.289970780E09 +++$+++ There also seems to be a problem with the assertion that she is an ancestor of many of the royal houses of Europe.   +++$+++ ::There also seems to be a problem with the assertion that she is an ancestor of many of the royal houses of Europe.  [[User:Kenilworth Terrace|Kenilworth Terrace]] ([[User talk:Kenilworth Terrace|talk]]) 21:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
5556 +++$+++ Kenilworth Terrace +++$+++ Bookworm857158367 +++$+++ 5553 +++$+++ 5555 +++$+++ 2010-11-17 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.290043740E09 +++$+++ You removed the \"failed verification\" tag without edit summary, without changing the citation and without addressing the issue on the talk page.  Please explain why.   +++$+++ :::You removed the "failed verification" tag without edit summary, without changing the citation and without addressing the issue on the talk page.  Please explain why.  [[User:Kenilworth Terrace|Kenilworth Terrace]] ([[User talk:Kenilworth Terrace|talk]]) 17:29, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

267698 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267698 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-27 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.201476420E09 +++$+++ Ok, I was unaware that you were still working on the article or that you were still in an edit conflict with PalaceGuard. Since you deleted all of the material I just added from the Steinhardt article (2004), I take it then that you believe describing the oldest existent wooden architecture ''in an article'' about ancient wooden architecture is unneccessary? I thought the info was rather relevant to the topic.--<strong> +++$+++ Ok, I was unaware that you were still working on the article or that you were still in an edit conflict with PalaceGuard. Since you deleted all of the material I just added from the Steinhardt article (2004), I take it then that you believe describing the oldest existent wooden architecture ''in an article'' about ancient wooden architecture is unneccessary? I thought the info was rather relevant to the topic.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 15:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
267699 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267698 +++$+++ 267698 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.201476840E09 +++$+++ I object to once again being kicked aside and the article I created being taken over and [[WP:OWN]] by another editor, first [[User:PalaceGuard008]], now you on the very same article. If you want to work collaboratively on the article, that would be welcome. Wholesale take over (on the grounds, I guess, that you are a superior editor because of the editing errors of mine you pointed out) is not. Lol!   +++$+++ :I object to once again being kicked aside and the article I created being taken over and [[WP:OWN]] by another editor, first [[User:PalaceGuard008]], now you on the very same article. If you want to work collaboratively on the article, that would be welcome. Wholesale take over (on the grounds, I guess, that you are a superior editor because of the editing errors of mine you pointed out) is not. Lol!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 15:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

612595 +++$+++ Kenosis +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612595 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.172014020E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the improvements you're making to this article. ...  +++$+++ I appreciate the improvements you're making to this article. ... [[User:Kenosis|Kenosis]] 15:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
612596 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612595 +++$+++ 612595 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.172014380E09 +++$+++ Thanks, this was a bit of tidying up and it's hard to find reliable sources, will comment on the article talk page. ..  +++$+++ :Thanks, this was a bit of tidying up and it's hard to find reliable sources, will comment on the article talk page. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

529844 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529844 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-23 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.224791460E09 +++$+++ I responded in the WP-Wisconsin talk page.The Wisconsin Historical Society has a Dictionary of Wisconsin History with 3 browse links-people, places, things.The historical society is an agency of the Wisconsin state government and therefore is a reliable source for verifiable information.I am not worry or concern that the 160 Wisconsin unicorporated communities articles will be deleted anytime soon.You have to look and dig for the information.The Wisconsin government keeps track of its unincorporated communities via the Dictionary of Wisconsin History.Many thanks- +++$+++ I responded in the WP-Wisconsin talk page.The Wisconsin Historical Society has a Dictionary of Wisconsin History with 3 browse links-people, places, things.The historical society is an agency of the Wisconsin state government and therefore is a reliable source for verifiable information.I am not worry or concern that the 160 Wisconsin unicorporated communities articles will be deleted anytime soon.You have to look and dig for the information.The Wisconsin government keeps track of its unincorporated communities via the Dictionary of Wisconsin History.Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 12:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
529845 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529844 +++$+++ 529844 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.224791640E09 +++$+++ I'm surprised that I didn't think about that website. I've used it many time before to add things like old names for towns. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I'm surprised that I didn't think about that website. I've used it many time before to add things like old names for towns. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:54, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
529846 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529844 +++$+++ 529845 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.224793560E09 +++$+++ There was something else that came to mind on Wisconsin local government.In the 1978 election-I am not sure if it was April or November, there was a proposed constitutional amendment that would had permitted the towns to have more then \"one system\" of government.Article IV, section 23 that is. That got voted down by a lopsided majority.The people in the Wisconsin towns are conservative and not open to change. Several of the towns like Richfield, Washington County, Wisconsin, Sumaico, Wisconsin, etc. voted for the option of becoming villages in order to provide for services not possible for them if they had remain towns and the one system constitutional requirement for the town government.Many thanks- +++$+++ ::There was something else that came to mind on Wisconsin local government.In the 1978 election-I am not sure if it was April or November, there was a proposed constitutional amendment that would had permitted the towns to have more then "one system" of government.Article IV, section 23 that is. That got voted down by a lopsided majority.The people in the Wisconsin towns are conservative and not open to change. Several of the towns like Richfield, Washington County, Wisconsin, Sumaico, Wisconsin, etc. voted for the option of becoming villages in order to provide for services not possible for them if they had remain towns and the one system constitutional requirement for the town government.Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:26, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
529847 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529844 +++$+++ 529846 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.224797460E09 +++$+++ Very interesting - I didn't know that. Thanks for the comment. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Very interesting - I didn't know that. Thanks for the comment. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 14:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

267701 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-27 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.201479540E09 +++$+++ I left another message on the article talk page...--<strong> +++$+++ I left another message on the article talk page...--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 16:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
267702 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267701 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.201482180E09 +++$+++ Yet again, another message on the article talk page.--<strong> +++$+++ ::Yet again, another message on the article talk page.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 17:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

267703 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267703 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-27 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.201489260E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, I re-added my material on the earliest extant Chinese wooden architecture (the only thing I plan on adding to the article) while keeping with your style of inline citations. I dislike this style of citations, but since you seem so dead-set in keeping it I don't mind following what you've already done. If there's anything you object to, make it known on the talk page there.--<strong> +++$+++ Just to let you know, I re-added my material on the earliest extant Chinese wooden architecture (the only thing I plan on adding to the article) while keeping with your style of inline citations. I dislike this style of citations, but since you seem so dead-set in keeping it I don't mind following what you've already done. If there's anything you object to, make it known on the talk page there.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 19:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
267704 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267703 +++$+++ 267703 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.201490580E09 +++$+++ Thank you for informing me. I dislike vehemently your style of citations also but I would never think to unilaterally change them in an article. I know that I was sloppy in that article, and I explained why (lack of time, under stress, arbitration etc.). Again, citation style is a matter of personal preference. Your style is hard for me to follow because it is not intuitive, meaning I guess, my training is in a science and the professional citation system I was trained in is very different. Please be tolerant of this.   +++$+++ :Thank you for informing me. I dislike vehemently your style of citations also but I would never think to unilaterally change them in an article. I know that I was sloppy in that article, and I explained why (lack of time, under stress, arbitration etc.). Again, citation style is a matter of personal preference. Your style is hard for me to follow because it is not intuitive, meaning I guess, my training is in a science and the professional citation system I was trained in is very different. Please be tolerant of this.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
267705 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267703 +++$+++ 267704 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.201492140E09 +++$+++ No problem; I will keep this in mind for the future, although I am much more concerned with editing general Chinese history articles than specifically Chinese architectural articles (that field is all yours, take it). I slightly doubt that I will be editing any of the architectural articles you will be working on in the future. You've already expressed concern on my talk page back in October that I could possibly \"undermine\" all of your efforts to use what you believe to be the most accurate and scholarly terminology for global architectural terms (such as zaojing instead of caisson). Personally I didn't want to be dragged into that fruitless argument between you and PalaceGuard008, and I'm sorry that my simple opinion that either zaojing or caisson could be used in the same article has led you to believe I'm some sort of enemy of yours. I miss the nice Mattisse who left me friendly messages on my talk page back in August and September; what happened to that Mattisse?--<strong> +++$+++ ::No problem; I will keep this in mind for the future, although I am much more concerned with editing general Chinese history articles than specifically Chinese architectural articles (that field is all yours, take it). I slightly doubt that I will be editing any of the architectural articles you will be working on in the future. You've already expressed concern on my talk page back in October that I could possibly "undermine" all of your efforts to use what you believe to be the most accurate and scholarly terminology for global architectural terms (such as zaojing instead of caisson). Personally I didn't want to be dragged into that fruitless argument between you and PalaceGuard008, and I'm sorry that my simple opinion that either zaojing or caisson could be used in the same article has led you to believe I'm some sort of enemy of yours. I miss the nice Mattisse who left me friendly messages on my talk page back in August and September; what happened to that Mattisse?--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 19:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
267706 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267703 +++$+++ 267705 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.201493580E09 +++$+++ Actually, at first you said either name would do. Then you posted to [[User:PalaceGuard008]]'s [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:PalaceGuard008&diff=164995391&oldid=164948484] page, behind my back so to speak,  that Caisson was the better name, that you were only going on what I wrote before and you inferred that I misled you.  That started his #REDIRECT and copy\/paste of the zaojing article into Caisson and ultimately, to an Arbitration.  Your going behind my back on that  was what prompted me to comment to you that I would not work with you any more.  +++$+++ :::Actually, at first you said either name would do. Then you posted to [[User:PalaceGuard008]]'s [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PalaceGuard008&diff=164995391&oldid=164948484] page, behind my back so to speak,  that Caisson was the better name, that you were only going on what I wrote before and you inferred that I misled you.  That started his #REDIRECT and copy/paste of the zaojing article into Caisson and ultimately, to an Arbitration.  Your going behind my back on that  was what prompted me to comment to you that I would not work with you any more. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 20:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
267707 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267703 +++$+++ 267706 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.201494660E09 +++$+++ What are you talking about? Now you're simply putting words in my mouth by saying I said \"Caisson was the better name\". No, '''that's not what I said at all'''. After I said there's no difference in the concept between a Caisson and zaojing and that you guys should \"''draw straws or play rock paper scissors''\" to settle the matter on your own, here's what I said in addition: \"''because there are articles on East Asian topics that have English originated titles or '''exact renditions of East Asian terms'''''.\" You can't get more neutral than that; that's the very definition of taking a neutral stance, by saying you could do something one way or the other. Now you are blaming me for something PalaceGuard008 did? I'm sorry, I fail to see how my tiny input had anything to do with his own actions. I think you are stretching my role in this about as far as possible.--<strong> +++$+++ ::::What are you talking about? Now you're simply putting words in my mouth by saying I said "Caisson was the better name". No, '''that's not what I said at all'''. After I said there's no difference in the concept between a Caisson and zaojing and that you guys should "''draw straws or play rock paper scissors''" to settle the matter on your own, here's what I said in addition: "''because there are articles on East Asian topics that have English originated titles or '''exact renditions of East Asian terms'''''." You can't get more neutral than that; that's the very definition of taking a neutral stance, by saying you could do something one way or the other. Now you are blaming me for something PalaceGuard008 did? I'm sorry, I fail to see how my tiny input had anything to do with his own actions. I think you are stretching my role in this about as far as possible.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 20:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

529849 +++$+++ Longhairandabeard +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-24 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.224851160E09 +++$+++ Yes, I love my name too.. Good to meet a fellow [[Trichophilia|trichophilic]].. Thanks for the DYK update; when no one commented on my hook on the talk page, I was feeling a little left out.. --  +++$+++ Yes, I love my name too.. Good to meet a fellow [[Trichophilia|trichophilic]].. Thanks for the DYK update; when no one commented on my hook on the talk page, I was feeling a little left out.. -- [[User:Longhairandabeard|Longhairandabeard]] ([[User talk:Longhairandabeard|talk]]) 05:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
529850 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529849 +++$+++ 529849 +++$+++ 2008-10-24 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.224851820E09 +++$+++ I thought your name was cool, not a fetish of mine. I always think that no news is good news! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I thought your name was cool, not a fetish of mine. I always think that no news is good news! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

529851 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-25 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.224931800E09 +++$+++ Not sure if I will be around, but you are perfectly welcome to flip it anytime after I have taken the \"inuse\" tag off.  +++$+++ Not sure if I will be around, but you are perfectly welcome to flip it anytime after I have taken the "inuse" tag off. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 03:50, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
529852 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529851 +++$+++ 529851 +++$+++ 2008-10-25 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.224935100E09 +++$+++ Since it was due by the time I finished, I flipped it myself. You are welcome to do the credits if you want tho :)  +++$+++ :Since it was due by the time I finished, I flipped it myself. You are welcome to do the credits if you want tho :) [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 04:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
529853 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529851 +++$+++ 529852 +++$+++ 2008-10-25 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.224935400E09 +++$+++ Thanks :) It took me a while longer than I anticipated because I took time out to verify some hooks on the fly myself, and then there was lots of room on the mainpage so I added some extra ones, since we have a growing backlog.  +++$+++ ::Thanks :) It took me a while longer than I anticipated because I took time out to verify some hooks on the fly myself, and then there was lots of room on the mainpage so I added some extra ones, since we have a growing backlog. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 04:50, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

612597 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.172537160E09 +++$+++ The Baraminology reports are  [http:\/\/rocr.xepher.net\/weblog\/archives\/001937.html here] and [http:\/\/rocr.xepher.net\/weblog\/archives\/001945.html here]. I used the research - though in a  more encyclopedic tone and stripping the OR - to revise the [[Baraminology]] article. Next, I think I'll work on a few things germaine to [[created kinds]] (or just poke fun of their so-called research. Either way.) It's actually a shared blog, run by a cartoonist friend, and several other Dutch cartoonists. As for the flood geology site - seems perfectly sane, reliable, and accurate. Go for it!  +++$+++ The Baraminology reports are  [http://rocr.xepher.net/weblog/archives/001937.html here] and [http://rocr.xepher.net/weblog/archives/001945.html here]. I used the research - though in a  more encyclopedic tone and stripping the OR - to revise the [[Baraminology]] article. Next, I think I'll work on a few things germaine to [[created kinds]] (or just poke fun of their so-called research. Either way.) It's actually a shared blog, run by a cartoonist friend, and several other Dutch cartoonists. As for the flood geology site - seems perfectly sane, reliable, and accurate. Go for it! [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 16:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
612598 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612597 +++$+++ 612597 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.172550900E09 +++$+++ Just updated part I, by the way. Damn parody sites being entirely accurate to the claims, but being slightly more mockable. Ah, well. Luckily the real creationists are just as stupid.  +++$+++ :Just updated part I, by the way. Damn parody sites being entirely accurate to the claims, but being slightly more mockable. Ah, well. Luckily the real creationists are just as stupid. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 20:35, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
612599 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612597 +++$+++ 612598 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.172673060E09 +++$+++ ...Jesus. Riding a dinosaur. Used unironicly.  My mind is broken.  +++$+++ ::...Jesus. Riding a dinosaur. Used unironicly.  My mind is broken. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 06:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

5569 +++$+++ Chrislk02 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5569 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-24 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.180048380E09 +++$+++ There is currently an problem with edits at [[Boeing B-29 Superfortress Survivors]].  A discussion has been started at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft#Input_requested_for_Boeing_B-29_Superfortress_Survivors|Wiki Project Aircraft's talk page]].  Your input, as a contributor to either an old or new version of the article would be much appreciated on the projects talk page.  Thanks!  +++$+++ There is currently an problem with edits at [[Boeing B-29 Superfortress Survivors]].  A discussion has been started at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft#Input_requested_for_Boeing_B-29_Superfortress_Survivors|Wiki Project Aircraft's talk page]].  Your input, as a contributor to either an old or new version of the article would be much appreciated on the projects talk page.  Thanks! [[User:Chrislk02|-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)]] 16:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
5570 +++$+++ Chrislk02 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5569 +++$+++ 5569 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.180122540E09 +++$+++ You are welcome to enhance the sections if you feel information was lost.  However, I do believe the table version is the most intutive to the casual reader.  As I have stated, wikipedia is not supposed to be a repository of all information for niche groups.  No list should have to have a \"how to use the list\" section as the top.  I belive putting in table format fixes that issue and may make it of some interest to the casual reader.  If you feel that information was lost though you are more than welcome to add it in!  Thanks for your feedback.  +++$+++ :You are welcome to enhance the sections if you feel information was lost.  However, I do believe the table version is the most intutive to the casual reader.  As I have stated, wikipedia is not supposed to be a repository of all information for niche groups.  No list should have to have a "how to use the list" section as the top.  I belive putting in table format fixes that issue and may make it of some interest to the casual reader.  If you feel that information was lost though you are more than welcome to add it in!  Thanks for your feedback. [[User:Chrislk02|-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)]] 12:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

529858 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-27 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.225108860E09 +++$+++ Hello, I just saw your message on Gwen's talk page, and I would just like to offer my input, please read that [[WP:NOTINHERITED|notability is not inherited]].\u2014 '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">D\xe6<\/font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|d\u03b1lus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions\/Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">Contribs<\/font>]]<\/sup> \/<sub> +++$+++ Hello, I just saw your message on Gwen's talk page, and I would just like to offer my input, please read that [[WP:NOTINHERITED|notability is not inherited]].— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup> /<sub>[[User:Daedalus969/RR|Improve]]</sub>''' 05:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
529859 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.225110000E09 +++$+++ Did the article assert why he was notable, besides the fact that he was apart of a notable group?\u2014 '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">D\xe6<\/font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|d\u03b1lus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions\/Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">Contribs<\/font>]]<\/sup> \/<sub> +++$+++ :Did the article assert why he was notable, besides the fact that he was apart of a notable group?— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup> /<sub>[[User:Daedalus969/RR|Improve]]</sub>''' 05:20, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
529860 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 529859 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 05:34:00 +++$+++ 1.225110840E09 +++$+++ The [[Tighe Scott]] article was lacking reliable sources, but that's not grounds for a speedy deletion when someone is part of a notable group. We don't delete (much less speedy delete) professional sports players articles just because they don't have reliable sources. We understand that they can be provided, so we apply maintenance tags like {{tl|notability}}, {{tl|unreferenced}}, {{tl|wikify}}, etc. Reliable sources would have been provided had I been given a chance. There's lots of consensus on keeping NASCAR driver's articles - I've never seen a professional race car driver article at his level fail any type of deletion. I created a stub article back in 2007 <s>because I had a great picture on him<\/s>. Looks like I should have spent more time creating an awesome DYK article on him! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::The [[Tighe Scott]] article was lacking reliable sources, but that's not grounds for a speedy deletion when someone is part of a notable group. We don't delete (much less speedy delete) professional sports players articles just because they don't have reliable sources. We understand that they can be provided, so we apply maintenance tags like {{tl|notability}}, {{tl|unreferenced}}, {{tl|wikify}}, etc. Reliable sources would have been provided had I been given a chance. There's lots of consensus on keeping NASCAR driver's articles - I've never seen a professional race car driver article at his level fail any type of deletion. I created a stub article back in 2007 <s>because I had a great picture on him</s>. Looks like I should have spent more time creating an awesome DYK article on him! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
529861 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 529860 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.225111380E09 +++$+++ Note to myself - some reliable sources that I found in 5 minutes: [http:\/\/www.nascar.com\/drivers\/dps\/tscott00\/cup\/index.html], [http:\/\/www.thetimes-tribune.com\/articles\/2008\/02\/17\/local_sports\/19304418.txt], [http:\/\/sports.espn.go.com\/rpm\/images?driverId=2661&seriesId=2], [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&q=%22tighe+scott%22+site%3Anascar.com&btnG=Search] . '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Note to myself - some reliable sources that I found in 5 minutes: [http://www.nascar.com/drivers/dps/tscott00/cup/index.html], [http://www.thetimes-tribune.com/articles/2008/02/17/local_sports/19304418.txt], [http://sports.espn.go.com/rpm/images?driverId=2661&seriesId=2], [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22tighe+scott%22+site%3Anascar.com&btnG=Search] . '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
529862 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 529860 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.225111620E09 +++$+++ You still haven't answered my question.\u2014 '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">D\xe6<\/font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|d\u03b1lus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions\/Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">Contribs<\/font>]]<\/sup> \/<sub> +++$+++ :::You still haven't answered my question.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup> /<sub>[[User:Daedalus969/RR|Improve]]</sub>''' 05:47, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
529863 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 529862 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.225112160E09 +++$+++ I know you can't see the article like I can. There was one reliable source so it had \"[[WP:NOTE|objective evidence]]\". Even if it was felt that the article wasn't notable, per [[Wikipedia:NOTE#Articles_not_satisfying_the_notability_guidelines]] reviewers should \"consider whether notability is established by the article, but whether it readily could be\". I am contending that it readily could be. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::I know you can't see the article like I can. There was one reliable source so it had "[[WP:NOTE|objective evidence]]". Even if it was felt that the article wasn't notable, per [[Wikipedia:NOTE#Articles_not_satisfying_the_notability_guidelines]] reviewers should "consider whether notability is established by the article, but whether it readily could be". I am contending that it readily could be. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
529864 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 529863 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.225116420E09 +++$+++ Can you please stop evading and answer my question?\u2014 '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">D\xe6<\/font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|d\u03b1lus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions\/Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">Contribs<\/font>]]<\/sup> \/<sub> +++$+++ :::::Can you please stop evading and answer my question?— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup> /<sub>[[User:Daedalus969/RR|Improve]]</sub>''' 07:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
529865 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 529864 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.225137780E09 +++$+++ [[WP:NOTE|Notability standards]] say that \"A topic is presumed to be sufficiently notable to merit an article if it meets the general notability guidelines below, or if it meets an accepted subject-specific standard listed in the table at the right.\" So meeting [[WP:ATHLETE]] means that it meets the notability standards. That's why your question keeps getting indirect answers. Are you asking if it meets the general notability standards? That's at least debatable. It only had one significant coverage in a reliable source independent of the source and more than one is preferred. Usually that second source is requested instead of nominating something for deletion. Speedy deleting is definitely wrong in this case. I spend time some time speedy deleting nominated articles. I took notes above so that I can add additional reliable sources after the article is returned, or so that I have a solid case at deletion review. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::[[WP:NOTE|Notability standards]] say that "A topic is presumed to be sufficiently notable to merit an article if it meets the general notability guidelines below, or if it meets an accepted subject-specific standard listed in the table at the right." So meeting [[WP:ATHLETE]] means that it meets the notability standards. That's why your question keeps getting indirect answers. Are you asking if it meets the general notability standards? That's at least debatable. It only had one significant coverage in a reliable source independent of the source and more than one is preferred. Usually that second source is requested instead of nominating something for deletion. Speedy deleting is definitely wrong in this case. I spend time some time speedy deleting nominated articles. I took notes above so that I can add additional reliable sources after the article is returned, or so that I have a solid case at deletion review. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
529866 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 529865 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.225171020E09 +++$+++ My question was clear and concise.  Did the article state why the subject was notable, or did it not?\u2014 '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">D\xe6<\/font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|d\u03b1lus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions\/Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">Contribs<\/font>]]<\/sup> \/<sub> +++$+++ :::::::My question was clear and concise.  Did the article state why the subject was notable, or did it not?— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup> /<sub>[[User:Daedalus969/RR|Improve]]</sub>''' 22:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
529867 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 529865 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.225171080E09 +++$+++ A simple ''yes'' or ''no'' will suffice, it shouldn't be that difficult a question; did the article state, ''the subject is notable because of reason A'' or not?\u2014 '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">D\xe6<\/font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|d\u03b1lus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions\/Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">Contribs<\/font>]]<\/sup> \/<sub> +++$+++ :::::::A simple ''yes'' or ''no'' will suffice, it shouldn't be that difficult a question; did the article state, ''the subject is notable because of reason A'' or not?— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup> /<sub>[[User:Daedalus969/RR|Improve]]</sub>''' 22:18, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
529868 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 529867 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.225179660E09 +++$+++ Make your own judgment. The article is back and you'll have to look in its history because I have significantly modified it (last [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tighe_Scott&oldid=247775923 diff] before deletion). No article uses the exact wording \"the subject is notable because ...\". Notability is the sum of the content of the article not a specific statement. Be aware that I am currently doing a significant expansion of the article. Be also aware that all recent AFD deletion discussion about NASCAR drivers and teams have led to speedy keep, mostly for drivers that were far less notable that Mr. Scott. None of them had Top 5 or even Top 10 finishes, which are the strong indicators of a successful driver in NASCAR-land. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::::Make your own judgment. The article is back and you'll have to look in its history because I have significantly modified it (last [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tighe_Scott&oldid=247775923 diff] before deletion). No article uses the exact wording "the subject is notable because ...". Notability is the sum of the content of the article not a specific statement. Be aware that I am currently doing a significant expansion of the article. Be also aware that all recent AFD deletion discussion about NASCAR drivers and teams have led to speedy keep, mostly for drivers that were far less notable that Mr. Scott. None of them had Top 5 or even Top 10 finishes, which are the strong indicators of a successful driver in NASCAR-land. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
529869 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 529868 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.225197360E09 +++$+++ It isn't my own judgment, it's consensus that for speedy deletions, if an article does not assert notability(and this is judged by a sentence, or paragraph, not content, in reference to A7s of Criterion for Speedy deletion), then it can be speedily deleted.  This article, the revision you noted, did not say why he was notable, it did not say why he deserved an article, and was thus deleted by policy.\u2014 '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">D\xe6<\/font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|d\u03b1lus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions\/Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">Contribs<\/font>]]<\/sup> \/<sub> +++$+++ :::::::::It isn't my own judgment, it's consensus that for speedy deletions, if an article does not assert notability(and this is judged by a sentence, or paragraph, not content, in reference to A7s of Criterion for Speedy deletion), then it can be speedily deleted.  This article, the revision you noted, did not say why he was notable, it did not say why he deserved an article, and was thus deleted by policy.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup> /<sub>[[User:Daedalus969/RR|Improve]]</sub>''' 05:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
529870 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529858 +++$+++ 529868 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.225197420E09 +++$+++ I could in fact note several articles which directly state\/assert the notability of whatever they're on, if you need examples.  Either way, that doesn't change the fact that that is why it was speedied.\u2014 '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">D\xe6<\/font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|d\u03b1lus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions\/Daedalus969|<font color=\"Green\">Contribs<\/font>]]<\/sup> \/<sub> +++$+++ :::::::::I could in fact note several articles which directly state/assert the notability of whatever they're on, if you need examples.  Either way, that doesn't change the fact that that is why it was speedied.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup> /<sub>[[User:Daedalus969/RR|Improve]]</sub>''' 05:37, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

5571 +++$+++ Maury Markowitz +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-12 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.181642640E09 +++$+++ Wow, that's a great image and it really improves the article. Nice stuff.  +++$+++ Wow, that's a great image and it really improves the article. Nice stuff. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury]] 03:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
5572 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5571 +++$+++ 5571 +++$+++ 2007-06-12 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.181648880E09 +++$+++ thank you, one of rare times when one has a camera for the perfect lighting.  +++$+++ * thank you, one of rare times when one has a camera for the perfect lighting. [[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] 04:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

267716 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267716 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-31 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.201850700E09 +++$+++ I'm not interested in furthering any investigation into Fred's conduct, but I'd like to help you to resolve your qualms about him if possible. -- +++$+++ I'm not interested in furthering any investigation into Fred's conduct, but I'd like to help you to resolve your qualms about him if possible. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 23:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
267717 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267716 +++$+++ 267716 +++$+++ 2008-01-31 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.201852080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your interest. However, to find the block would require that I make the effort to go find it for, as you point out, no outcome. The unblocking is only a tiny issue relative to the whole of what has transpired. And, of course, any unblocking can be justified even in very equivocal cases, as I have observed. So, what would be the point? I have my opinion of Fred, based on the Arbitration experience plus one year of observing his continued interaction with the person who brought (or rather  in whose behalf the sock puppets brought) the Arbitration case to begin with. And, by the way, sock puppets have continued to turn up, a couple just recently. Fred has an ongoing interaction with this person  and choses to be oblivious of this. As you say, Fred can do what he wants. Thanks anyway.   +++$+++ :Thanks for your interest. However, to find the block would require that I make the effort to go find it for, as you point out, no outcome. The unblocking is only a tiny issue relative to the whole of what has transpired. And, of course, any unblocking can be justified even in very equivocal cases, as I have observed. So, what would be the point? I have my opinion of Fred, based on the Arbitration experience plus one year of observing his continued interaction with the person who brought (or rather  in whose behalf the sock puppets brought) the Arbitration case to begin with. And, by the way, sock puppets have continued to turn up, a couple just recently. Fred has an ongoing interaction with this person  and choses to be oblivious of this. As you say, Fred can do what he wants. Thanks anyway.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 23:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

5573 +++$+++ Fnlayson +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-02 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.183408500E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.wingweb.co.uk\/aircraft\/The_Rockwell_B-1_Lancer.html B-1 Lancer page on wingweb.co.uk] from [[B-1 Lancer]] saying there were \"errors in 7 photos on this webpage\".  I'm just wondering what the errors with the images are.  I'm not seeing anything obvious.  Thanks. - +++$+++ [http://www.wingweb.co.uk/aircraft/The_Rockwell_B-1_Lancer.html B-1 Lancer page on wingweb.co.uk] from [[B-1 Lancer]] saying there were "errors in 7 photos on this webpage".  I'm just wondering what the errors with the images are.  I'm not seeing anything obvious.  Thanks. -[[User:Fnlayson|Fnlayson]] 13:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
5574 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5573 +++$+++ 5573 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.183409400E09 +++$+++ The pics were labeled as B-1B, incorrect, the photos were of the B-1'''A'''.  I notified the webmaster of the incorrect captions.  The photos were taken at the [[Wings Over the Rockies Air and Space Museum]] of the A model. I work and volunteer at this Museum.  I also added a \"welcome\" and note to the editor(IP address) who added the link.   I will be more than happy to take a series of walk around photos of the A model and label them according for our [[B-1 Lancer]] article.  I recently added the nose-shot.  +++$+++ : The pics were labeled as B-1B, incorrect, the photos were of the B-1'''A'''.  I notified the webmaster of the incorrect captions.  The photos were taken at the [[Wings Over the Rockies Air and Space Museum]] of the A model. I work and volunteer at this Museum.  I also added a "welcome" and note to the editor(IP address) who added the link.   I will be more than happy to take a series of walk around photos of the A model and label them according for our [[B-1 Lancer]] article.  I recently added the nose-shot. [[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] 13:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
5575 +++$+++ Fnlayson +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5573 +++$+++ 5574 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.183414740E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  That was simpler than I expected. ;)  I think the last B-1A originally had a B-1B type blunt tail randome, but they switched it with an A style pointed one after it was sent to a museum.  If you can take some detailed pictures to add to what's in the B-1 article, that'd be great.  I'm not sure what to add though.  Take it easy. - +++$+++ :* Thanks!  That was simpler than I expected. ;)  I think the last B-1A originally had a B-1B type blunt tail randome, but they switched it with an A style pointed one after it was sent to a museum.  If you can take some detailed pictures to add to what's in the B-1 article, that'd be great.  I'm not sure what to add though.  Take it easy. -[[User:Fnlayson|Fnlayson]] 15:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
5576 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5573 +++$+++ 5573 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.183594260E09 +++$+++ Jeff, The UK site fixed the captions, and I have added the link back into the [[B-1 Lancer|B-1]] article, with some extra cleanup. Have a great 4th!  +++$+++ * Jeff, The UK site fixed the captions, and I have added the link back into the [[B-1 Lancer|B-1]] article, with some extra cleanup. Have a great 4th! [[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] 17:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

267718 +++$+++ Risker +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-02 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.201942020E09 +++$+++ I'm reaching out to you and asking that you reconsider striking your comments on this page. I too am just an ordinary editor who's been here for a couple of years; I know how disappointing it is to discover that the 'real' Wikipedia is not the Utopian one of legend. It's my belief, however, that if not for folks like us speaking out on issues we believe in, logically and sensibly, the Wikipedia experience here will continue to degenerate for us and for others.  It was very reassuring to see your words on that page, to know that another editor had an opinion similar to mine.  Believe it or not, there are a few Wikipedians who listen, and some of them are even administrators.  Please reconsider your strikethroughs.  Your voice is respected.   +++$+++ I'm reaching out to you and asking that you reconsider striking your comments on this page. I too am just an ordinary editor who's been here for a couple of years; I know how disappointing it is to discover that the 'real' Wikipedia is not the Utopian one of legend. It's my belief, however, that if not for folks like us speaking out on issues we believe in, logically and sensibly, the Wikipedia experience here will continue to degenerate for us and for others.  It was very reassuring to see your words on that page, to know that another editor had an opinion similar to mine.  Believe it or not, there are a few Wikipedians who listen, and some of them are even administrators.  Please reconsider your strikethroughs.  Your voice is respected.  [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 00:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
267719 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267718 +++$+++ 267718 +++$+++ 2008-02-02 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.201971780E09 +++$+++ I agree. I've probably been 'involved' with Wikipedia for too long now to fully understand what it feels like to feel like you are on the outside looking in, but I do remember for the first few years struggling to come to terms with the way things ''really'' worked. Voices like yours are a breath of fresh air and are sorely needed. Please don't retreat from that discussion. Your voice is as valuable as anyone else's, possibly more so. And for the record, I've only been here a year or so longer than you, and for much of the first year I did little editing.  +++$+++ :I agree. I've probably been 'involved' with Wikipedia for too long now to fully understand what it feels like to feel like you are on the outside looking in, but I do remember for the first few years struggling to come to terms with the way things ''really'' worked. Voices like yours are a breath of fresh air and are sorely needed. Please don't retreat from that discussion. Your voice is as valuable as anyone else's, possibly more so. And for the record, I've only been here a year or so longer than you, and for much of the first year I did little editing. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 09:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
267720 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267718 +++$+++ 267719 +++$+++ 2008-02-02 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.202024820E09 +++$+++ I have thought very hard about this but I cannot reconsider, as much as I would like to support a fellow editor. The whole thing is too ugly and depressing. It is not as if anything good will come of the Arbitration or that I can contribute anything of value. Yesterday made that clear, if there was any doubt,  as well as the \"value\" held of my opinion.  The Arbitration has revealed much about why my two years here have been so unpleasant and I will take it all  as a huge lesson learned for me. Regards,  +++$+++ ::I have thought very hard about this but I cannot reconsider, as much as I would like to support a fellow editor. The whole thing is too ugly and depressing. It is not as if anything good will come of the Arbitration or that I can contribute anything of value. Yesterday made that clear, if there was any doubt,  as well as the "value" held of my opinion.  The Arbitration has revealed much about why my two years here have been so unpleasant and I will take it all  as a huge lesson learned for me. Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 23:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

267721 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267721 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-02 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.201950900E09 +++$+++ Hi, there, I hope you're well. There is an editor to the above article who has removed sourced material. I'm not an expert so I'm bringing this to your attention in case you want to express an opinion. Regards --''' +++$+++ Hi, there, I hope you're well. There is an editor to the above article who has removed sourced material. I'm not an expert so I'm bringing this to your attention in case you want to express an opinion. Regards --'''[[User:Rodhullandemu|<font color="7F007F">'''Rodhullandemu'''</font>]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|Talk]]) 03:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
267722 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267721 +++$+++ 267721 +++$+++ 2008-02-02 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.202005560E09 +++$+++ I made a few changes to the page, specifically removing the section on Mitigating factors. Insanity is never a mitigating factor. I also put some requests for citations for the last section which, at least to me, is confusing.   I am not sure of the specific issue you are referring to. Could you point it out? Regards,  +++$+++ :I made a few changes to the page, specifically removing the section on Mitigating factors. Insanity is never a mitigating factor. I also put some requests for citations for the last section which, at least to me, is confusing.   I am not sure of the specific issue you are referring to. Could you point it out? Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
267723 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267721 +++$+++ 267722 +++$+++ 2008-02-02 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.202005860E09 +++$+++ It was this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Insanity&diff=188520386&oldid=188069248 diff], but I see it's since been reverted. There was a comment on the talk page explaining why it had been removed which, frankly I didn't understand; up to you if you wish to keep an eye on it. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ ::It was this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Insanity&diff=188520386&oldid=188069248 diff], but I see it's since been reverted. There was a comment on the talk page explaining why it had been removed which, frankly I didn't understand; up to you if you wish to keep an eye on it. Cheers. --'''[[User:Rodhullandemu|<font color="7F007F">'''Rodhullandemu'''</font>]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|Talk]]) 18:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

5578 +++$+++ BillCJ +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-25 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.185372660E09 +++$+++ Lance, regarding the cat change on the [[Boeing E-767]], I sincerely dout that was vandalism. At mt request, [[User:Yasobara]] translated the Japanese E-767 page for us, providing most of the content currently in the this article. Most likely, he just got mixed up between the E-767 and 737 AEW&C, which is the Wedgetail. -  +++$+++ Lance, regarding the cat change on the [[Boeing E-767]], I sincerely dout that was vandalism. At mt request, [[User:Yasobara]] translated the Japanese E-767 page for us, providing most of the content currently in the this article. Most likely, he just got mixed up between the E-767 and 737 AEW&C, which is the Wedgetail. - [[User:BillCJ|BillCJ]] 07:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
5579 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5578 +++$+++ 5578 +++$+++ 2007-07-25 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.185372900E09 +++$+++ Good point. Thank you for the explaination. It looked strange at first, as I was cleaning up all the boeing cat. nomenclatures.  Thanks.  +++$+++ : Good point. Thank you for the explaination. It looked strange at first, as I was cleaning up all the boeing cat. nomenclatures.  Thanks. [[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] 07:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

267724 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-02 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.202020800E09 +++$+++ Hi, an article you've edited, [[Guilty pleasure]], has been nominated for deletion.  It's AfD nomination is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Guilty_pleasure here].  -- +++$+++ Hi, an article you've edited, [[Guilty pleasure]], has been nominated for deletion.  It's AfD nomination is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Guilty_pleasure here].  --[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog|talk]]) 22:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
267725 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267724 +++$+++ 267724 +++$+++ 2008-02-02 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.202022780E09 +++$+++ Fine with me if it is deleted. I agree it is an unsourced definition.  +++$+++ :Fine with me if it is deleted. I agree it is an unsourced definition. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 23:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

267727 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-04 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.202159940E09 +++$+++ Cheers!   +++$+++ Cheers!  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 13:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
267728 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267727 +++$+++ 267727 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.202162820E09 +++$+++ Sorry. What I meant was that the section is filled with statements that take a particular point of view but are not footnoted so the reader does not know where to look to verify whether these statements are true or not, per [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]]. Regards,  +++$+++ :Sorry. What I meant was that the section is filled with statements that take a particular point of view but are not footnoted so the reader does not know where to look to verify whether these statements are true or not, per [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]]. Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

267729 +++$+++ Latebird +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267729 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-06 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.202308800E09 +++$+++ Hi, I hope you're not trying to [[WP:POINT|make a point]] by removing all information about the basin from the [[Uvs Nuur]] article? It is entirely reasonable to include information on both the lake and the basin there, but I don't think your original edit made sense in context. Or are you planning to create a seperate article about the basin? -- +++$+++ Hi, I hope you're not trying to [[WP:POINT|make a point]] by removing all information about the basin from the [[Uvs Nuur]] article? It is entirely reasonable to include information on both the lake and the basin there, but I don't think your original edit made sense in context. Or are you planning to create a seperate article about the basin? --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|talk]]) 06:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
267730 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267729 +++$+++ 267729 +++$+++ 2008-02-06 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.202342100E09 +++$+++ We have been through this discussion before. I believe you were the one that suggested renaming the article to basin on the talk page, as the general name of '''Uvs Nuur''' is vague and covers differing area, depending on the sources you consult. However, if you do not want to change the name to basin, then I feel very strongly in the interests of clarity (since the subject to many readers is confusing,including to me when I first started looking into it), the references to \"basin\" should be removed. The basin deserves it's own article.  I have worked, in general, to match World Heritage Sites with the names of the articles corresponding to them, as there are vast mismatching common here.  It does not make sense otherwise, and diminishes the encyclopedia. If you want, we can have an RFC over it, as I feel strongly enough about these disparities between World Heritage Site names and Wikipedia article names to settle this once and for all. I will abide by any RFC outcome and desist my efforts to match World Heritage Site names with articles if that is required. Regards,   +++$+++ :We have been through this discussion before. I believe you were the one that suggested renaming the article to basin on the talk page, as the general name of '''Uvs Nuur''' is vague and covers differing area, depending on the sources you consult. However, if you do not want to change the name to basin, then I feel very strongly in the interests of clarity (since the subject to many readers is confusing,including to me when I first started looking into it), the references to "basin" should be removed. The basin deserves it's own article.  I have worked, in general, to match World Heritage Sites with the names of the articles corresponding to them, as there are vast mismatching common here.  It does not make sense otherwise, and diminishes the encyclopedia. If you want, we can have an RFC over it, as I feel strongly enough about these disparities between World Heritage Site names and Wikipedia article names to settle this once and for all. I will abide by any RFC outcome and desist my efforts to match World Heritage Site names with articles if that is required. Regards,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 15:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
267731 +++$+++ Latebird +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267729 +++$+++ 267730 +++$+++ 2008-02-06 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.202343600E09 +++$+++ If you check the talk page, you'll find that I didn't suggest renaming the lake article to basin. I suggested merging the two articles that previously existed, because they essentially contained the same information. The result is, that the article now contains information on both topics. My editor note on my first revert was thus technically somewhat inaccurate, sorry for that. As long as there is not enough specific information to justify a seperate article, including information about the basin in the article about the lake is the natural thing to do. If you find a good way to split the topics again without creating too much redundancy, then you'll have my full support. But removing valid information just so that a heritage sites list doesn't need to link to a slightly different title sounds like cutting off your nose to spite your face. Such formalisms should not override common sense. -- +++$+++ ::If you check the talk page, you'll find that I didn't suggest renaming the lake article to basin. I suggested merging the two articles that previously existed, because they essentially contained the same information. The result is, that the article now contains information on both topics. My editor note on my first revert was thus technically somewhat inaccurate, sorry for that. As long as there is not enough specific information to justify a seperate article, including information about the basin in the article about the lake is the natural thing to do. If you find a good way to split the topics again without creating too much redundancy, then you'll have my full support. But removing valid information just so that a heritage sites list doesn't need to link to a slightly different title sounds like cutting off your nose to spite your face. Such formalisms should not override common sense. --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|talk]]) 16:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

5588 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5588 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-18 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.190171640E09 +++$+++ [[User talk:67.84.116.10]] has vandalized [[Apollo 11]] 3 times is sequence, please block indefinitely. Thank you.  +++$+++ [[User talk:67.84.116.10]] has vandalized [[Apollo 11]] 3 times is sequence, please block indefinitely. Thank you. [[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] 20:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
5589 +++$+++ 86.140.177.115 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5588 +++$+++ 5588 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.190399820E09 +++$+++ Four things wrong with your request. Gurch is not an administrator, so cannot block users. Gurch has not edited for over two months. We don't block IP addresses indefinitely. We don't block users for vandalism without warning them first. \u2013  +++$+++ : Four things wrong with your request. Gurch is not an administrator, so cannot block users. Gurch has not edited for over two months. We don't block IP addresses indefinitely. We don't block users for vandalism without warning them first. – [[User:86.140.177.115|86.140.177.115]] 11:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

5591 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-10 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.192075620E09 +++$+++ My goodness, what did you do?  I redirected [[ACM]] to [[Association for Computing Machinery]] and ''fixed'' the improper \"for other uses\" banner at that top of that article because I thought that your intention was to have ACM redirected to Association for Computing Machinery.  What you actually did, in putting \"for other uses\" banners at the tops of ''all'' those articles, has no precedent in guidelines and is not useful in the slightest.  The purpose of \"redirects here\" and \"other uses\" banners is to assist in disambiguation, but since no user will ever arrive at any of those other articles by searching on \"ACM\", all those banners you put up are specious.  I hope you won't leave it to me to go and revert them.  This issue is wholly independent of whether or not \"ACM\" should redirect to \"Association for Computing Machinery\", a debate I have no strong feelings for one way or another, although I do believe that the Association for Computing Machinery was probably the ''first'' and ''best known'' ACM and the one with the ''most members'', giving it at least some priority for the acronym.  +++$+++ My goodness, what did you do?  I redirected [[ACM]] to [[Association for Computing Machinery]] and ''fixed'' the improper "for other uses" banner at that top of that article because I thought that your intention was to have ACM redirected to Association for Computing Machinery.  What you actually did, in putting "for other uses" banners at the tops of ''all'' those articles, has no precedent in guidelines and is not useful in the slightest.  The purpose of "redirects here" and "other uses" banners is to assist in disambiguation, but since no user will ever arrive at any of those other articles by searching on "ACM", all those banners you put up are specious.  I hope you won't leave it to me to go and revert them.  This issue is wholly independent of whether or not "ACM" should redirect to "Association for Computing Machinery", a debate I have no strong feelings for one way or another, although I do believe that the Association for Computing Machinery was probably the ''first'' and ''best known'' ACM and the one with the ''most members'', giving it at least some priority for the acronym. [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] 21:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
5592 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5591 +++$+++ 5591 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 08:31:00 +++$+++ 1.192116660E09 +++$+++ Okay, but you seem to be missing the point.  Whether or not [[ACM]] redirects to [[ACM (disambiguation)]]--and I don't have a problem with that--all of the other ACM-like articles should not say \"For other uses, see [[ACM (disambiguation)]].\"  Do you understand why?  +++$+++ :Okay, but you seem to be missing the point.  Whether or not [[ACM]] redirects to [[ACM (disambiguation)]]--and I don't have a problem with that--all of the other ACM-like articles should not say "For other uses, see [[ACM (disambiguation)]]."  Do you understand why? [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] 08:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
5593 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5591 +++$+++ 5592 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.192118580E09 +++$+++ No template should be used.  This is a case of the [[Wikipedia:Hatnotes#Disambiguating_article_names_that_are_not_ambiguous|improper user of hatnotes]].  +++$+++ ::No template should be used.  This is a case of the [[Wikipedia:Hatnotes#Disambiguating_article_names_that_are_not_ambiguous|improper user of hatnotes]]. [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] 09:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
5594 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5591 +++$+++ 5593 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.192122300E09 +++$+++ I understand the need for wanting to be link-rich and giving users the privilege of exploring the encyclopedia and learning.  But, unfortunately, doing so in arbitrary ways (such as with hatnotes) becomes unweildy and unmaintainable.  Best just to write good articles with lots of wikilinks, and reserve hatnoting to its important function of disambiguation.  Thanks for understanding and cheers,  +++$+++ :::I understand the need for wanting to be link-rich and giving users the privilege of exploring the encyclopedia and learning.  But, unfortunately, doing so in arbitrary ways (such as with hatnotes) becomes unweildy and unmaintainable.  Best just to write good articles with lots of wikilinks, and reserve hatnoting to its important function of disambiguation.  Thanks for understanding and cheers, [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] 10:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

267736 +++$+++ Latebird +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-06 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.202348940E09 +++$+++ I merged many articles you wrote? Which ones? Actually, I didn't even merge this one myself. And if I happen to merge articles, I don't normally mind who created them, I just try to follow what I consider common sense. If you think you know better, why don't you present your arguments instead of just brushing my questions and suggestions aside, and acting generally hostile? Do you expect anyone to just share your opinions right from the start? I was already surprised when you talked about a possible RFC in your first response, before even trying to establish a meaningful conversation. I really hope this is not your general style of discussion. -- +++$+++ I merged many articles you wrote? Which ones? Actually, I didn't even merge this one myself. And if I happen to merge articles, I don't normally mind who created them, I just try to follow what I consider common sense. If you think you know better, why don't you present your arguments instead of just brushing my questions and suggestions aside, and acting generally hostile? Do you expect anyone to just share your opinions right from the start? I was already surprised when you talked about a possible RFC in your first response, before even trying to establish a meaningful conversation. I really hope this is not your general style of discussion. --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|talk]]) 17:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
267737 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267736 +++$+++ 267736 +++$+++ 2008-02-06 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.202349480E09 +++$+++ I certainly hope revert is not your general style of conducing edit discussions. Read [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/IRC\/Proposed decision]]. The arbs all agree that to use Revert as you did for a content disagreement is '''Reversion not a substitute for discussion''' - two different finding of this - reversion is basically for obviously vandalism only plus a finding of '''Pages are not owned''' which is obviously not your view. I certainly will not name any articles to you as I do not want them disrupted further.  +++$+++ :I certainly hope revert is not your general style of conducing edit discussions. Read [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/IRC/Proposed decision]]. The arbs all agree that to use Revert as you did for a content disagreement is '''Reversion not a substitute for discussion''' - two different finding of this - reversion is basically for obviously vandalism only plus a finding of '''Pages are not owned''' which is obviously not your view. I certainly will not name any articles to you as I do not want them disrupted further. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
267738 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267736 +++$+++ 267737 +++$+++ 2008-02-06 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.202349720E09 +++$+++ And please read above for my opinion.   +++$+++ ::And please read above for my opinion.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
267739 +++$+++ Latebird +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267736 +++$+++ 267738 +++$+++ 2008-02-06 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.202352300E09 +++$+++ I'm not up to [[WP:WL|wikilawyering]] today. Will check back later. -- +++$+++ :::I'm not up to [[WP:WL|wikilawyering]] today. Will check back later. --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|talk]]) 18:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
267740 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267736 +++$+++ 267739 +++$+++ 2008-02-06 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.202352540E09 +++$+++ O.K. It would be nice if we could work this out.   +++$+++ ::::O.K. It would be nice if we could work this out.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

529884 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-31 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.225454580E09 +++$+++ Left a note for you at [[Template talk:Did you know]].  +++$+++ Left a note for you at [[Template talk:Did you know]]. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 05:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
529885 +++$+++ Chantessy +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529884 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.225488420E09 +++$+++ In Miley Cyrus' Breakout album's liner notes, she refers to her older half brother as Tracey Dempsey Cyrus...?  +++$+++ ::In Miley Cyrus' Breakout album's liner notes, she refers to her older half brother as Tracey Dempsey Cyrus...? [[User:Chantessy|<font style="color:royalblue">chant</font>]][[user talk:Chantessy|<font style="color:navy">essy</font>]] 14:27, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

5597 +++$+++  +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.193241900E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]]. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 09:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
5598 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5597 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.193243400E09 +++$+++ Added PD-self.  fixed.  +++$+++ :: Added PD-self.  fixed. [[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] 09:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

263077 +++$+++ PaulWicks +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-05 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.238987760E09 +++$+++ Hello, I've taken another pass at this article and if you are still interested I'd invite you to come take a look, rip it all apart, and put it back together again better than it was! Cheers, -- +++$+++ Hello, I've taken another pass at this article and if you are still interested I'd invite you to come take a look, rip it all apart, and put it back together again better than it was! Cheers, --[[User:PaulWicks|PaulWicks]] ([[User talk:PaulWicks|talk]]) 20:16, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
263078 +++$+++ PaulWicks +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263077 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.238991960E09 +++$+++ Hmm, if I were being bold I'd suggest merging NES and PNES, although which way round I don't know. I also have proposed merging in [[Hystero-epilepsy]] which doesn't appear to be adding much... WRT neurons n' stuff I probably know more than a highschool student but substantially less than a neuroscientist. I will focus my efforts on the clinical\/medical level and hope someone more competent than me will tackle the wet lab stuff =) -- +++$+++ ::Hmm, if I were being bold I'd suggest merging NES and PNES, although which way round I don't know. I also have proposed merging in [[Hystero-epilepsy]] which doesn't appear to be adding much... WRT neurons n' stuff I probably know more than a highschool student but substantially less than a neuroscientist. I will focus my efforts on the clinical/medical level and hope someone more competent than me will tackle the wet lab stuff =) --[[User:PaulWicks|PaulWicks]] ([[User talk:PaulWicks|talk]]) 21:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
263079 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263077 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.238993580E09 +++$+++ Oh don't be so bold. PNES is a diagnosis. It typically affects a certain patient group and is treated psychologically. NES is a classification and although a doctor may (finally) say \"they were non-epileptic seizures\" the actual diagnosis would be something else. If you feel there isn't enough material, or it would help to merge the two, then I'd reluctantly vote for a merging into NES with the P bit as a section. But I think one can expand PNES sufficiently that it warrants its own article. Have a look at [http:\/\/adc.bmj.com\/cgi\/content\/full\/91\/3\/214 this article]. The psychological cause comes a distant second to syncope, in children.  When the general reader comes to WP to learn about what their doctor is considering as an alternative to epilepsy for these \"seizures\" their child is having, I don't think it helps to have it conflated with a psychosocial condition mainly affecting young women.  +++$+++ :::Oh don't be so bold. PNES is a diagnosis. It typically affects a certain patient group and is treated psychologically. NES is a classification and although a doctor may (finally) say "they were non-epileptic seizures" the actual diagnosis would be something else. If you feel there isn't enough material, or it would help to merge the two, then I'd reluctantly vote for a merging into NES with the P bit as a section. But I think one can expand PNES sufficiently that it warrants its own article. Have a look at [http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/91/3/214 this article]. The psychological cause comes a distant second to syncope, in children.  When the general reader comes to WP to learn about what their doctor is considering as an alternative to epilepsy for these "seizures" their child is having, I don't think it helps to have it conflated with a psychosocial condition mainly affecting young women. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
263080 +++$+++ PaulWicks +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263077 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.239029520E09 +++$+++ Good find, I particularly like the acronym: \"fits, faints, and funny turns\" (FFAFT). So some NES are PNES, PNES consist of NES, but not all NES are PNES. Gotcha. I'll beef up the PNES article with some more references than that one review and then we'll reassess. Right now the intro to NES seems to divert you off to PNES right from the get-go so I think a lot of folk will end of reading both and getting confused. -- +++$+++ ::::Good find, I particularly like the acronym: "fits, faints, and funny turns" (FFAFT). So some NES are PNES, PNES consist of NES, but not all NES are PNES. Gotcha. I'll beef up the PNES article with some more references than that one review and then we'll reassess. Right now the intro to NES seems to divert you off to PNES right from the get-go so I think a lot of folk will end of reading both and getting confused. --[[User:PaulWicks|PaulWicks]] ([[User talk:PaulWicks|talk]]) 07:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

5600 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-20 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.195622700E09 +++$+++ What's your basis for saying that \"consistancy has been established long ago for Related content\", relative to such headers on place articles?  [[Erie, Pennsylvania]], [[Cleveland, Ohio]], and [[Providence, Rhode Island]] are all FAs, with eleven navboxes at their bottoms but no such header; Erie and Cleveland both have county templates, and Providence would have one if the state weren't small enough that it didn't need them.  Moreover, [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities\/Guideline]] says nothing about such headers, and the external links header is specifically given as the final header in the outline.   +++$+++ What's your basis for saying that "consistancy has been established long ago for Related content", relative to such headers on place articles?  [[Erie, Pennsylvania]], [[Cleveland, Ohio]], and [[Providence, Rhode Island]] are all FAs, with eleven navboxes at their bottoms but no such header; Erie and Cleveland both have county templates, and Providence would have one if the state weren't small enough that it didn't need them.  Moreover, [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/Guideline]] says nothing about such headers, and the external links header is specifically given as the final header in the outline.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 21:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
5601 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5600 +++$+++ 5600 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.195627620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note!  The big thing, in my mind, is that the AFB is a place, not an airplane, and I don't see anything on the page to which you link (or the main page of the WProject) saying that it covers air force bases.  The reason that we have the second and third boxes on that page, as you likely noticed, is that it's a [[census-designated place]] and therefore obviously covered by the guidelines that I mentioned above.  Please pardon if I came across as angry or something; I didn't mean to.  I'm going to be gone for some days without Internet access, so if you'd like to see a third party in the discussion, you'll have to ask for it, and definitely don't expect me to be able to say anything at all :-)  As you said to me: have a happy Thanksgiving!   +++$+++ :Thanks for the note!  The big thing, in my mind, is that the AFB is a place, not an airplane, and I don't see anything on the page to which you link (or the main page of the WProject) saying that it covers air force bases.  The reason that we have the second and third boxes on that page, as you likely noticed, is that it's a [[census-designated place]] and therefore obviously covered by the guidelines that I mentioned above.  Please pardon if I came across as angry or something; I didn't mean to.  I'm going to be gone for some days without Internet access, so if you'd like to see a third party in the discussion, you'll have to ask for it, and definitely don't expect me to be able to say anything at all :-)  As you said to me: have a happy Thanksgiving!  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 22:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
5602 +++$+++ Student7 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5600 +++$+++ 5601 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.195636260E09 +++$+++ Not seeing the other side of this, don't know what the answer to Nyttend was, but will check his page. My problem '''may''' be slightly different - are you thinking that the navigational templates (such as the one in PAFB) need a different header or an additional one? This may need to be discussed or maybe just change them and see what happens. They are nearly all in the same boat. Every...single...navigational template.  +++$+++ ::Not seeing the other side of this, don't know what the answer to Nyttend was, but will check his page. My problem '''may''' be slightly different - are you thinking that the navigational templates (such as the one in PAFB) need a different header or an additional one? This may need to be discussed or maybe just change them and see what happens. They are nearly all in the same boat. Every...single...navigational template. [[User:Student7|Student7]] ([[User talk:Student7|talk]]) 01:11, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
5603 +++$+++ Student7 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5600 +++$+++ 5602 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.195642380E09 +++$+++ Well, I see your point. I have noticed some nav boxes being placed higher in the article under the \"appropriate\" subsection. As you probably have seen, most editors have automatically placed them at the bottom of the article to avoid detracting from the article. Probably ought to be discussed at a higher Wikipedia forum. There are thousands of nav boxes in (perhaps) tens of thousands of articles! (Something to keep a bot busy for several happy nanoseconds!   :)  Except I'm not sure a bot could do it!  +++$+++ :::Well, I see your point. I have noticed some nav boxes being placed higher in the article under the "appropriate" subsection. As you probably have seen, most editors have automatically placed them at the bottom of the article to avoid detracting from the article. Probably ought to be discussed at a higher Wikipedia forum. There are thousands of nav boxes in (perhaps) tens of thousands of articles! (Something to keep a bot busy for several happy nanoseconds!   :)  Except I'm not sure a bot could do it! [[User:Student7|Student7]] ([[User talk:Student7|talk]]) 02:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
5604 +++$+++ Student7 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5600 +++$+++ 5603 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.195643400E09 +++$+++ How about here - [[Wikipedia talk:Navigational templates]] for a Wikipedia-wide discussion? Just a thought. +++$+++ ::::How about here - [[Wikipedia talk:Navigational templates]] for a Wikipedia-wide discussion? Just a thought.[[User:Student7|Student7]] ([[User talk:Student7|talk]]) 03:10, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
5605 +++$+++ Binksternet +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5600 +++$+++ 5601 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.197261540E09 +++$+++ Decreasing white space is a noble concept but is nearly impossible to achieve when the readers are using a wide assortment of operating systems, screen sizes and browser applications. The best one can do is shoot for the median... which is what, exactly? Current internet screen resolutions: 1024x768 54%, 1280 and up 26%, 800x600 14%. Current internet browsers: Firefox 36%, IE6 35%, IE7 21%. Current internet operating systems: WinXP 74%, Win2xxx 6.8% and falling, Vista 5% and climbing, Mac 4%, Linux 3.3%. All of these numbers depend on whose data is being examined. I got this lot from www.w3schools.com who compile and publish their access logs. At any rate, it appears that one can't really win the white space fight as there's no settled viewing standard.  +++$+++ ::Decreasing white space is a noble concept but is nearly impossible to achieve when the readers are using a wide assortment of operating systems, screen sizes and browser applications. The best one can do is shoot for the median... which is what, exactly? Current internet screen resolutions: 1024x768 54%, 1280 and up 26%, 800x600 14%. Current internet browsers: Firefox 36%, IE6 35%, IE7 21%. Current internet operating systems: WinXP 74%, Win2xxx 6.8% and falling, Vista 5% and climbing, Mac 4%, Linux 3.3%. All of these numbers depend on whose data is being examined. I got this lot from www.w3schools.com who compile and publish their access logs. At any rate, it appears that one can't really win the white space fight as there's no settled viewing standard. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 20:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
5606 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5600 +++$+++ 5603 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.197261900E09 +++$+++ Bink, I also use the 1024x768 but with Explorer 7, not sure why we don't see the same thing. Maybe Firefox is differential. I left another message for Bill under his talk, with an idea for a joint project to expand the operators section with more data, with a single column list and pic along the right side. THis should be okay with all browsers. I hope... Thanks, Lance....  +++$+++ ::::Bink, I also use the 1024x768 but with Explorer 7, not sure why we don't see the same thing. Maybe Firefox is differential. I left another message for Bill under his talk, with an idea for a joint project to expand the operators section with more data, with a single column list and pic along the right side. THis should be okay with all browsers. I hope... Thanks, Lance.... [[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] ([[User talk:LanceBarber|talk]]) 20:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
5607 +++$+++ Binksternet +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5600 +++$+++ 5606 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.197262380E09 +++$+++ I concur that the single column can still be a good solution. I see it as an opportunity to display right-hand side images.  +++$+++ :::::I concur that the single column can still be a good solution. I see it as an opportunity to display right-hand side images. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 20:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

529892 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-06 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.226011020E09 +++$+++ Can you flip it in an hour or so? We're trying to flip it every four hours to get rid of the backlog. I'd do it myself but I'm not sure if I'll be up that late.  +++$+++ Can you flip it in an hour or so? We're trying to flip it every four hours to get rid of the backlog. I'd do it myself but I'm not sure if I'll be up that late. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 14:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
529893 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529892 +++$+++ 529892 +++$+++ 2008-11-06 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.226012520E09 +++$+++ Sure. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Sure. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 15:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
529894 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529892 +++$+++ 529893 +++$+++ 2008-11-06 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.226013120E09 +++$+++ Cool, thanks :)  +++$+++ ::Cool, thanks :) [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 15:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

5608 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5608 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-12 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.197522240E09 +++$+++ Hi again. I guess you missed my [[Talk:Air Force Materiel Command#MIMIC development|question]]. Would appreciate a clarification. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi again. I guess you missed my [[Talk:Air Force Materiel Command#MIMIC development|question]]. Would appreciate a clarification. Thanks. [[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee|talk]]) 21:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
5609 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5608 +++$+++ 5608 +++$+++ 2007-12-15 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.197735480E09 +++$+++ Thanks to you, LanceBarber. Happy wikiediting.  +++$+++ :Thanks to you, LanceBarber. Happy wikiediting. [[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee|talk]]) 08:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
5610 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5608 +++$+++ 5609 +++$+++ 2007-12-30 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.199067360E09 +++$+++ Fixed +++$+++ ::Fixed[[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] ([[User talk:LanceBarber#top|talk]]) 18:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

267753 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-08 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.202534280E09 +++$+++ I think you should take a look at [[User:P199]].  +++$+++ I think you should take a look at [[User:P199]]. [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 21:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
267754 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267753 +++$+++ 267753 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.202534400E09 +++$+++ I did. That is why I wrote you the above comment.   +++$+++ :I did. That is why I wrote you the above comment.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 21:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
267755 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267753 +++$+++ 267754 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.202535900E09 +++$+++ [[Uvs Nuur (disambiguation)]] was created by Mikkalai, and appears as (currently) the fifth entry in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/P199 P199's edit history]. It is linked to at the top of the [[Uvs Nuur]] page. It's late now, so don't expect any further replies today. Regards,  +++$+++ ::[[Uvs Nuur (disambiguation)]] was created by Mikkalai, and appears as (currently) the fifth entry in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/P199 P199's edit history]. It is linked to at the top of the [[Uvs Nuur]] page. It's late now, so don't expect any further replies today. Regards, [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 21:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
267756 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267753 +++$+++ 267755 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.202541060E09 +++$+++ Many thanks. [[User:Mikkalai]] appears to agree with me so there is hope after all.  +++$+++ :::Many thanks. [[User:Mikkalai]] appears to agree with me so there is hope after all. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 23:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

5613 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5613 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-14 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.200330480E09 +++$+++ I've copied your comments to the talk page, and made a start on what was suggested. All of the place names have links somewhere in the article. Is a redlink to Boreas Corporation needed?  +++$+++ I've copied your comments to the talk page, and made a start on what was suggested. All of the place names have links somewhere in the article. Is a redlink to Boreas Corporation needed? [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 09:08, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
5614 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5613 +++$+++ 5613 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.200449940E09 +++$+++ Redlinks aren't necessarily a bad thing, look what happened to [[Alaska Coastal Airlines]]! I'll add a redlink, but I'm not writing the article! At least there is a [http:\/\/www.sun-n-fun.org\/content\/interior.asp?section=museum&body=displays\/fahs05 start point].  +++$+++ : Redlinks aren't necessarily a bad thing, look what happened to [[Alaska Coastal Airlines]]! I'll add a redlink, but I'm not writing the article! At least there is a [http://www.sun-n-fun.org/content/interior.asp?section=museum&body=displays/fahs05 start point]. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 18:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
5615 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5613 +++$+++ 5614 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.200450240E09 +++$+++ PS - Thanks for barnstar!  +++$+++ ::PS - Thanks for barnstar! [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 18:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

5616 +++$+++ DagosNavy +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5616 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-17 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.200597120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:DagosNavy|DagosNavy]] 11:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
5617 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5616 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-17 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.200622020E09 +++$+++ Job well done. Upgraded to B-class. +++$+++ :: Job well done. Upgraded to B-class.[[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] ([[User talk:LanceBarber#top|talk]]) 18:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
5618 +++$+++ DagosNavy +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5616 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-18 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.200643200E09 +++$+++ THANKS A LOT, Lance!!!. I have no words for the Barnstar...here in Argentina is summer right now, so I will get a pint of chilled dark beer ;)...Thank you again! +++$+++ ::::THANKS A LOT, Lance!!!. I have no words for the Barnstar...here in Argentina is summer right now, so I will get a pint of chilled dark beer ;)...Thank you again![[User:DagosNavy|DagosNavy]] 00:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

529905 +++$+++ Petersent +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529905 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-10 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.226311440E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I was just about to create a new article for Riley Armstrong (the CCM musician, not the hockey player) when I noticed that a previous Riley Armstrong page had been deleted some months back (ref: [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Contemporary_Christian_music]]).  Could you put a copy of the deleted article in my [[User:Petersent\/Sandbox|sandbox]] to give me an idea of what the article looked like (i.e. what may have led to the deletion) and also in case there was anything worth scavenging?  Preferably the Wikitext language version if possible.  Thanks<\/br> +++$+++ Hi.  I was just about to create a new article for Riley Armstrong (the CCM musician, not the hockey player) when I noticed that a previous Riley Armstrong page had been deleted some months back (ref: [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Contemporary_Christian_music]]).  Could you put a copy of the deleted article in my [[User:Petersent/Sandbox|sandbox]] to give me an idea of what the article looked like (i.e. what may have led to the deletion) and also in case there was anything worth scavenging?  Preferably the Wikitext language version if possible.  Thanks</br>[[User:Petersent|Petersent]] ([[User talk:Petersent|talk]]) 02:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
529906 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529905 +++$+++ 529905 +++$+++ 2008-11-10 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.226325960E09 +++$+++ Restored, replied on your talk page. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Restored, replied on your talk page. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 06:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
529907 +++$+++ Petersent +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529905 +++$+++ 529906 +++$+++ 2008-11-11 06:38:00 +++$+++ 1.226414280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Petersent|Petersent]] ([[User talk:Petersent|talk]]) 06:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
529908 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529905 +++$+++ 529907 +++$+++ 2008-11-11 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.226415960E09 +++$+++ It is critical that we add awards, review and interviews - so it is critical that you keep doing them. They substantiate that the subject of the article is notable as you have indicated. I'm sure that there are MANY notable CCM articles that should be written although none are in my mind right now. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::It is critical that we add awards, review and interviews - so it is critical that you keep doing them. They substantiate that the subject of the article is notable as you have indicated. I'm sure that there are MANY notable CCM articles that should be written although none are in my mind right now. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 07:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
529909 +++$+++ Petersent +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529905 +++$+++ 529906 +++$+++ 2008-11-20 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.227181800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the pointers.  I expect to get a copy of Powell's Encyclopedia of CCM fairly soon.  Would be nice if he was to publish a revised and expanded edition.  There are a couple of artists I am doing research on, but don't expect another article this year.  At least not before Christmas.  Blessings,<\/br> +++$+++ ::Thanks for the pointers.  I expect to get a copy of Powell's Encyclopedia of CCM fairly soon.  Would be nice if he was to publish a revised and expanded edition.  There are a couple of artists I am doing research on, but don't expect another article this year.  At least not before Christmas.  Blessings,</br>[[User:Petersent|Petersent]] ([[User talk:Petersent|talk]]) 03:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

5620 +++$+++ Mr Thant +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-19 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.200801960E09 +++$+++ Since when have we needed permission from the local protection racket to make edits? -- +++$+++ Since when have we needed permission from the local protection racket to make edits? --[[User:Mr Thant|Mr Thant]] ([[User talk:Mr Thant|talk]]) 20:06, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
5621 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5620 +++$+++ 5620 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.200936660E09 +++$+++ Since when do people get to choose to ignore proper merge procedures?  +++$+++ : Since when do people get to choose to ignore proper merge procedures? [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper|talk]]) 09:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

267765 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267765 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-12 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.202866200E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 17:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
267766 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267765 +++$+++ 267765 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.202870640E09 +++$+++ I will write you. I just have been so very very tired. I have not forgotten and think about doing it every day. Just that it is so hard to explain.  +++$+++ :I will write you. I just have been so very very tired. I have not forgotten and think about doing it every day. Just that it is so hard to explain. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

5622 +++$+++ Simply south +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-21 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.200915240E09 +++$+++ I didn't notice your request to Slambo. Anyway, i have done a separate request at [[WP:RFP]].  +++$+++ I didn't notice your request to Slambo. Anyway, i have done a separate request at [[WP:RFP]]. [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] ([[User talk:Simply south|talk]]) 03:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
5623 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5622 +++$+++ 5622 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.200937020E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately this was actioned after [[User:Mr Thant]] remerged the pages, effectively \"hiding\" the relevent discussions on [[Talk:Balham tube station]] and [[Talk:Balham railway station]]. This is all becoming a bit of a joke.  +++$+++ :Unfortunately this was actioned after [[User:Mr Thant]] remerged the pages, effectively "hiding" the relevent discussions on [[Talk:Balham tube station]] and [[Talk:Balham railway station]]. This is all becoming a bit of a joke. [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper|talk]]) 09:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
5624 +++$+++ Simply south +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5622 +++$+++ 5623 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.200941100E09 +++$+++ I have reverted the original pages and added merge tags. The protection expires on Wednesday.  +++$+++ ::I have reverted the original pages and added merge tags. The protection expires on Wednesday. [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] ([[User talk:Simply south|talk]]) 10:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

267767 +++$+++ JIP +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267767 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-12 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.202870100E09 +++$+++ You claimed [[waterwings]] was a neologism. Waterwings are pretty notable, as you can hardly go to a public beach or swimming pool without seeing someone wearing them. But as English is not my first language, I don't know if \"waterwings\" is the most correct term for them, or is there one that is in wider use.  +++$+++ You claimed [[waterwings]] was a neologism. Waterwings are pretty notable, as you can hardly go to a public beach or swimming pool without seeing someone wearing them. But as English is not my first language, I don't know if "waterwings" is the most correct term for them, or is there one that is in wider use. [[User:JIP|<font color="#CC0000">J</font><font color="#00CC00">I</font><font color="#0000CC">P</font>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]] 18:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
267768 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267767 +++$+++ 267767 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.202870520E09 +++$+++ All you have to do is show the term \"waterwings\"  is a word in common use per [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] by providing some footnote citations to that effect. Regards,  +++$+++ :All you have to do is show the term "waterwings"  is a word in common use per [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] by providing some footnote citations to that effect. Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

267770 +++$+++ Latebird +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267770 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-14 07:41:00 +++$+++ 1.203003660E09 +++$+++ Since you have in the mean time added the misnamed image to several articles without a good reason, please change all those instances to the correct image name [[:Image:Uureg Nuur.jpg]] now, so that the old file can be deleted as it should. -- +++$+++ Since you have in the mean time added the misnamed image to several articles without a good reason, please change all those instances to the correct image name [[:Image:Uureg Nuur.jpg]] now, so that the old file can be deleted as it should. --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|talk]]) 07:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267771 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267770 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.203030300E09 +++$+++ Please stop ordering me around and making decisions about articles in the last few days that have existed for a long time (and in which you played no role previously). You come in like the boss and make decisions and take actions without consultation or consensus. This is hardly the atmosphere if you desire cooperation from me. As far as I know, you are not the king and should obtain consensus before you make major changes.  +++$+++ ::Please stop ordering me around and making decisions about articles in the last few days that have existed for a long time (and in which you played no role previously). You come in like the boss and make decisions and take actions without consultation or consensus. This is hardly the atmosphere if you desire cooperation from me. As far as I know, you are not the king and should obtain consensus before you make major changes. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 15:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267772 +++$+++ Latebird +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267770 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.203035880E09 +++$+++ If you add images to articles that are clearly and demonstrably incorrect like in this case, then you'll have to expect that other editors ''politely ask you to correct your mistake''. Or do you expect other people to clean up after you? Since the Google Maps link above proves beyond any reasonble doubt that your opinion is mistaken, no further consensus is needed here. Reality as documented by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] always takes precedence. -- +++$+++ :::If you add images to articles that are clearly and demonstrably incorrect like in this case, then you'll have to expect that other editors ''politely ask you to correct your mistake''. Or do you expect other people to clean up after you? Since the Google Maps link above proves beyond any reasonble doubt that your opinion is mistaken, no further consensus is needed here. Reality as documented by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] always takes precedence. --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|talk]]) 16:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267773 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267770 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.203036420E09 +++$+++ You did not ask me, politely or otherwise, to \"correct\" my mistake. You merely removed the image from the article and put it up for deletion without consulting me. Or is that your way to \"politely ask you to correct your mistake\"?    +++$+++ ::::You did not ask me, politely or otherwise, to "correct" my mistake. You merely removed the image from the article and put it up for deletion without consulting me. Or is that your way to "politely ask you to correct your mistake"?   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 16:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

5627 +++$+++ ArielGold +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5627 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-11 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.202784540E09 +++$+++ Also so you're familiar with it, in every mission article, the project standardizes the opening sentence to clearly state if the mission is an ISS mission or not, so the very first sentence will say \"is a Space Shuttle mission to the International Space Station\", which, for a reader unfamiliar with the subject, is more helpful than to immediately use the acronym \"ISS\", which not every reader will understand. Please, please do not take this as criticism, as you've made many excellent and helpful additions to a huge variety of pages, but the lead sentence for shuttle missions is something that was decided on by a number of project members, and standardization is used for mission articles. I have corrected most of them, but if you notice any I may have missed and would fix them, that would be great! Thank you so much, <small> +++$+++ Also so you're familiar with it, in every mission article, the project standardizes the opening sentence to clearly state if the mission is an ISS mission or not, so the very first sentence will say "is a Space Shuttle mission to the International Space Station", which, for a reader unfamiliar with the subject, is more helpful than to immediately use the acronym "ISS", which not every reader will understand. Please, please do not take this as criticism, as you've made many excellent and helpful additions to a huge variety of pages, but the lead sentence for shuttle missions is something that was decided on by a number of project members, and standardization is used for mission articles. I have corrected most of them, but if you notice any I may have missed and would fix them, that would be great! Thank you so much, <small>[[user:ArielGold|<font color="8B00FF">'''Ariel'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/ArielGold|<font color="F64A8A">♥</font>]][[User_talk:ArielGold|<font color="007FFF">'''Gold'''</font>]]</small> 18:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
5628 +++$+++ ArielGold +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5627 +++$+++ 5627 +++$+++ 2008-02-11 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.202791140E09 +++$+++ Hi Lance! Thanks so much for your reply. Yes, I too noticed that some of the older articles (that haven't been reviewed by project folks) were done rather haphazardly, without the proper leads. I also understand the reasons that an aircraft's name is bolded along with its \"common name\", so I had no doubts that you were working towards standardization. However, a few things are different when it comes to shuttle missions, first, NASA does not call them \"STS-XXX Shuttle-ISS Mission\", they call them by their official designation, (simply the STS-###) as does Wikipedia when naming the articles. Second, especially with the ISS missions, the information is given immediately in the opening sentence (\"was a space shuttle mission to the International Space Station\"), which lets the reader know right away what the mission's purpose\/objective was, so to say \"shuttle mission\" in bold, and then repeating the same information in the sentence, is not really necessary. Understandably, the Mir missions were done differently, and actually this was because there used to be a template used that standardized the opening of all shuttle missions, but it was deleted in TFD many months ago, so the administrator who updated the files linking to that template, not being part of the WikiProject, did not know that the template provided a measure of standardization, and simply filled in what they thought was appropriate. For many of these, When going through them all, I went ahead and added to the lead sentence the main objective of the mission, to make it clear in the lead what the purpose was, which improves them for a general reader. I really personally appreciate all the time you went to, especially with the talk page work! I have done that as I've come across them, but did not ever take the time to work through each mission one by one, and your work there was simply excellent! Keep up the excellent flight article work! <small> +++$+++ :Hi Lance! Thanks so much for your reply. Yes, I too noticed that some of the older articles (that haven't been reviewed by project folks) were done rather haphazardly, without the proper leads. I also understand the reasons that an aircraft's name is bolded along with its "common name", so I had no doubts that you were working towards standardization. However, a few things are different when it comes to shuttle missions, first, NASA does not call them "STS-XXX Shuttle-ISS Mission", they call them by their official designation, (simply the STS-###) as does Wikipedia when naming the articles. Second, especially with the ISS missions, the information is given immediately in the opening sentence ("was a space shuttle mission to the International Space Station"), which lets the reader know right away what the mission's purpose/objective was, so to say "shuttle mission" in bold, and then repeating the same information in the sentence, is not really necessary. Understandably, the Mir missions were done differently, and actually this was because there used to be a template used that standardized the opening of all shuttle missions, but it was deleted in TFD many months ago, so the administrator who updated the files linking to that template, not being part of the WikiProject, did not know that the template provided a measure of standardization, and simply filled in what they thought was appropriate. For many of these, When going through them all, I went ahead and added to the lead sentence the main objective of the mission, to make it clear in the lead what the purpose was, which improves them for a general reader. I really personally appreciate all the time you went to, especially with the talk page work! I have done that as I've come across them, but did not ever take the time to work through each mission one by one, and your work there was simply excellent! Keep up the excellent flight article work! <small>[[user:ArielGold|<font color="8B00FF">'''Ariel'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/ArielGold|<font color="F64A8A">♥</font>]][[User_talk:ArielGold|<font color="007FFF">'''Gold'''</font>]]</small> 20:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

5629 +++$+++ FieldMarine +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5629 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 05:34:00 +++$+++ 1.203168840E09 +++$+++ Greetings.  Why are the following external links at [[Florida Historical Society]]?  Thanks.  +++$+++ Greetings.  Why are the following external links at [[Florida Historical Society]]?  Thanks. [[User:FieldMarine|FieldMarine]] ([[User talk:FieldMarine|talk]]) 05:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
5630 +++$+++ FieldMarine +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5629 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.203169920E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your prompt response...Nice overall work on aviation history.   +++$+++ ::Thanks for your prompt response...Nice overall work on aviation history.  [[User:FieldMarine|FieldMarine]] ([[User talk:FieldMarine|talk]]) 05:52, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

267774 +++$+++ Aelfthrytha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-14 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.203057720E09 +++$+++ Hi -- I'm trying to get a handle on what's happening over there. Would you be willing to not edit that article for an hour and a half to an hour while I try to read and wrap my mind around what's happened and what the essence of the dispute is? I'll let you know when I've at least read up to what's there now. Let me know if you have concerns.  +++$+++ Hi -- I'm trying to get a handle on what's happening over there. Would you be willing to not edit that article for an hour and a half to an hour while I try to read and wrap my mind around what's happened and what the essence of the dispute is? I'll let you know when I've at least read up to what's there now. Let me know if you have concerns. [[User:Aelfthrytha|Aelfthrytha]] ([[User talk:Aelfthrytha|talk]]) 22:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267775 +++$+++ Aelfthrytha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267774 +++$+++ 267774 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.203058140E09 +++$+++ Nevermind. I tried and I already have a headache. Will ask for Russian speaking admins to check it out.  +++$+++ :Nevermind. I tried and I already have a headache. Will ask for Russian speaking admins to check it out. [[User:Aelfthrytha|Aelfthrytha]] ([[User talk:Aelfthrytha|talk]]) 22:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267776 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267774 +++$+++ 267774 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.203058560E09 +++$+++ I last edited the article 01:17, 14 February 2008 and do not intend to edit it or any others in that area again. I have been effectively driven off. I had a pleasant time learning about the area while I was writing the articles. But I am not prepared to deal with the level of aggression and ownership that has suddenly erupted after many  months of peaceful editing. I am willing to move on to sweeter pastures with a more open mentality, like science and legal articles where the editors are kinder and do not redirect etc. without discussion and consensus.      +++$+++ :I last edited the article 01:17, 14 February 2008 and do not intend to edit it or any others in that area again. I have been effectively driven off. I had a pleasant time learning about the area while I was writing the articles. But I am not prepared to deal with the level of aggression and ownership that has suddenly erupted after many  months of peaceful editing. I am willing to move on to sweeter pastures with a more open mentality, like science and legal articles where the editors are kinder and do not redirect etc. without discussion and consensus.     [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 22:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

567575 +++$+++ Cielomobile +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-12 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.181709840E09 +++$+++ Considering your edit count (over 4500, larger than mine), I figure that you don't actually want to be adopted anymore, but if you're still interested, I'd be happy to help you out. If not, you should probably remove the infobox from your user page, as it puts you in the category of users wanting to be adopted. If you want some help from an admin in regards to getting adminship someday, you should probably head over to [[Wikipedia:Admin coaching]]. --  +++$+++ Considering your edit count (over 4500, larger than mine), I figure that you don't actually want to be adopted anymore, but if you're still interested, I'd be happy to help you out. If not, you should probably remove the infobox from your user page, as it puts you in the category of users wanting to be adopted. If you want some help from an admin in regards to getting adminship someday, you should probably head over to [[Wikipedia:Admin coaching]]. -- [[User: Cielomobile|Cielomobile]] <sup>[[User talk:Cielomobile|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cielomobile|contribs]]</sup> 21:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
567576 +++$+++ Cielomobile +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567575 +++$+++ 567575 +++$+++ 2007-06-12 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.181710980E09 +++$+++ Alright, then you should probably head over to admin coaching; that'd be the right place for you. I removed the infbox, if that's alright. Best of luck! --  +++$+++ :Alright, then you should probably head over to admin coaching; that'd be the right place for you. I removed the infbox, if that's alright. Best of luck! -- [[User: Cielomobile|Cielomobile]] <sup>[[User talk:Cielomobile|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cielomobile|contribs]]</sup> 22:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

88320 +++$+++ 213.243.157.114 +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-07-20 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.090363620E09 +++$+++ There are several other Wikipedias for other languages, and you are very welcome to use Serbocroat name forms in the Serbocroat-language Wikipedia(s).  +++$+++ There are several other Wikipedias for other languages, and you are very welcome to use Serbocroat name forms in the Serbocroat-language Wikipedia(s). [[User:213.243.157.114|213.243.157.114]] 15:47, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
88321 +++$+++ Shallot +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88320 +++$+++ 88320 +++$+++ 2004-07-20 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.090363680E09 +++$+++ I've no idea why you're telling me this. -- +++$+++ : I've no idea why you're telling me this. --[[User:Shallot|Shallot]] 15:48, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)

267778 +++$+++ mikkalai +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267778 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.203165120E09 +++$+++ I stopped doing anything significant there because I am sick and tired of ignorant people trying to suit facts to their level of understanding. After long and painful experience I have found it more productive to go away until they become tired with toying in one place and go away elsewhere. Wikipedia articles are not matter of life and death and may wait.  `' +++$+++ I stopped doing anything significant there because I am sick and tired of ignorant people trying to suit facts to their level of understanding. After long and painful experience I have found it more productive to go away until they become tired with toying in one place and go away elsewhere. Wikipedia articles are not matter of life and death and may wait.  `'[[user:mikkalai|Míkka]][[user talk:mikkalai|>t]] 04:32, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
267779 +++$+++ mikkalai +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267778 +++$+++ 267778 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.203165180E09 +++$+++ P.S. After saving my text here I have noticed your remark just above mine. So we are in agreement in this respect as well :-). Good better luck! `' +++$+++ :P.S. After saving my text here I have noticed your remark just above mine. So we are in agreement in this respect as well :-). Good better luck! `'[[user:mikkalai|Míkka]][[user talk:mikkalai|>t]] 04:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

394155 +++$+++ 86.57.254.215 +++$+++ Daven200520 +++$+++ 394155 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-16 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.208357940E09 +++$+++ You better watch your templates. -- [[Special:Contributions\/86.57.254.215|86.57.254.215]] ( +++$+++ You better watch your templates. -- [[Special:Contributions/86.57.254.215|86.57.254.215]] ([[User talk:86.57.254.215|talk]]) 07:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
394156 +++$+++ 86.57.254.215 +++$+++ Daven200520 +++$+++ 394155 +++$+++ 394155 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.208358180E09 +++$+++ That wasn't you sorry -- [[Special:Contributions\/86.57.254.215|86.57.254.215]] ( +++$+++ :That wasn't you sorry -- [[Special:Contributions/86.57.254.215|86.57.254.215]] ([[User talk:86.57.254.215|talk]]) 08:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
394157 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ Daven200520 +++$+++ 394155 +++$+++ 394155 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.208358240E09 +++$+++ (ec) Explanation - Jayson, you've attracted a fan who decided to issue spurious vandalism warnings in your name - [[Special:Contributions\/90.151.83.105]] - earning himself a holiday from editing as a result.  Let me know if you see this happening again, and I'll extend the holiday.  Regards,  +++$+++ :(ec) Explanation - Jayson, you've attracted a fan who decided to issue spurious vandalism warnings in your name - [[Special:Contributions/90.151.83.105]] - earning himself a holiday from editing as a result.  Let me know if you see this happening again, and I'll extend the holiday.  Regards, [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 08:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

5636 +++$+++ PeterWD +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5636 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-01 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.204398000E09 +++$+++ each, but which are the preferred ?  +++$+++ each, but which are the preferred ? [[User:PeterWD|PeterWD]] ([[User talk:PeterWD|talk]]) 11:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
5637 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5636 +++$+++ 5636 +++$+++ 2008-03-02 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.204463880E09 +++$+++ Do not know which is preferred. See your Talk page under \"Spec\" subsection for details. Lance... +++$+++ : Do not know which is preferred. See your Talk page under "Spec" subsection for details. Lance...[[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] ([[User talk:LanceBarber#top|talk]]) 05:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

267781 +++$+++ Latebird +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267781 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-14 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.203036300E09 +++$+++ Dear Mattisse, I'm not willing to tolerate your entirely baseless accusations any longer. The next time you make clearly incorrect claims (like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Ubsunur_Hollow_Biosphere_Reserve&curid=15655963&diff=191426662&oldid=191385585 the last time here]), attributing statements and opinions to me that I never made or held, you will be reported for [[WP:NPA|person attacks]], [[WP:CIVIL|uncivility]], and violation of any other Wikipedia policy that happens to match the specific situation. What you're doing is systematically coming ''closer and closer to libel'', which is no trivial matter. Please be aware that other editors and especially admins have no problem in checking the relevant edit histories and diffs, and I have no problem in providing them, so that any unsubstianted claims by you are trivial to document. My very long patience with your unjustified but exceedingly hostile behaviour is now over. Please get a grip on reality, '''provide diffs for ''anything'' negative you claim about me, or face the consequences'''. Thanks for your understanding. -- +++$+++ Dear Mattisse, I'm not willing to tolerate your entirely baseless accusations any longer. The next time you make clearly incorrect claims (like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ubsunur_Hollow_Biosphere_Reserve&curid=15655963&diff=191426662&oldid=191385585 the last time here]), attributing statements and opinions to me that I never made or held, you will be reported for [[WP:NPA|person attacks]], [[WP:CIVIL|uncivility]], and violation of any other Wikipedia policy that happens to match the specific situation. What you're doing is systematically coming ''closer and closer to libel'', which is no trivial matter. Please be aware that other editors and especially admins have no problem in checking the relevant edit histories and diffs, and I have no problem in providing them, so that any unsubstianted claims by you are trivial to document. My very long patience with your unjustified but exceedingly hostile behaviour is now over. Please get a grip on reality, '''provide diffs for ''anything'' negative you claim about me, or face the consequences'''. Thanks for your understanding. --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|talk]]) 16:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267782 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267781 +++$+++ 267781 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.203036780E09 +++$+++ Do what you want. Until you stop your unilateral changing of articles and requesting deletion of images without consulting me, I cannot consider you other that violating wiki policy on consensus. I feel like I have been putting up with your arbitrary behavior on articles I have worked on for a while and on which you suddenly turn up on and disrupt without consensus.  +++$+++ :Do what you want. Until you stop your unilateral changing of articles and requesting deletion of images without consulting me, I cannot consider you other that violating wiki policy on consensus. I feel like I have been putting up with your arbitrary behavior on articles I have worked on for a while and on which you suddenly turn up on and disrupt without consensus. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 16:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267783 +++$+++ Latebird +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267781 +++$+++ 267782 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.203042420E09 +++$+++ Btw: \"Without consulting you\"? Do you happen to [[WP:OWN]] an image that [[:commons:User:High Contrast|someone else]] [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image:Uvs_nuur.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=8844773 uploaded to the Commons]? And in case you really don't understand that: A request for deletion is a formal way to ask other editors what they think about it, hence the exact opposite of acting unilaterally. Not to mention that I reported about that request [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Ubsunur_Hollow_Biosphere_Reserve&diff=191163614&oldid=191162904 here] for you and other interested editors to see and possibly step in if I should have happened to be mistaken (which, despite your claims to the opposite, wasn't the case). And the image will not be gone, it has already been replaced by [[:commons:Image:Uureg Nuur.jpg|a copy with the correct name]]. -- +++$+++ ::Btw: "Without consulting you"? Do you happen to [[WP:OWN]] an image that [[:commons:User:High Contrast|someone else]] [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Uvs_nuur.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=8844773 uploaded to the Commons]? And in case you really don't understand that: A request for deletion is a formal way to ask other editors what they think about it, hence the exact opposite of acting unilaterally. Not to mention that I reported about that request [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ubsunur_Hollow_Biosphere_Reserve&diff=191163614&oldid=191162904 here] for you and other interested editors to see and possibly step in if I should have happened to be mistaken (which, despite your claims to the opposite, wasn't the case). And the image will not be gone, it has already been replaced by [[:commons:Image:Uureg Nuur.jpg|a copy with the correct name]]. --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|talk]]) 18:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267784 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267781 +++$+++ 267783 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.203042960E09 +++$+++ I don't care enough to wade into the history of this unsavory experience. I know that the joy of creating the articles last year and learning about that area of the world is lost for me. As for the image, I did not know it was in the commons. I uploaded it myself from NASA. I had not seen the image before.   +++$+++ :::I don't care enough to wade into the history of this unsavory experience. I know that the joy of creating the articles last year and learning about that area of the world is lost for me. As for the image, I did not know it was in the commons. I uploaded it myself from NASA. I had not seen the image before.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267785 +++$+++ Latebird +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267781 +++$+++ 267784 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.203046140E09 +++$+++ The experience only became unsavoury because you chose to ignore the history right from the start. That seems to be a sad pattern here: Don't look at what really happened, but instead just scream murder. And whoever you first noticed around will then forever be the scapegoat in your eyes. Time to get back to reality! -- +++$+++ ::::The experience only became unsavoury because you chose to ignore the history right from the start. That seems to be a sad pattern here: Don't look at what really happened, but instead just scream murder. And whoever you first noticed around will then forever be the scapegoat in your eyes. Time to get back to reality! --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|talk]]) 19:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267786 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267781 +++$+++ 267785 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.203046500E09 +++$+++ Hum. That sounds like a personal attack.   +++$+++ :::::Hum. That sounds like a personal attack.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

529926 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529926 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-20 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.227230040E09 +++$+++ The new lead pic isn't showing up.  I'll do a little research to find out why.  <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ The new lead pic isn't showing up.  I'll do a little research to find out why.  <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 17:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
529927 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529926 +++$+++ 529926 +++$+++ 2008-11-20 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.227232320E09 +++$+++ I was hoping it was something simple, like a typo or something, but it is more involved than that.  <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ :I was hoping it was something simple, like a typo or something, but it is more involved than that.  <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 17:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
529928 +++$+++ JLG 2701 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529926 +++$+++ 529927 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.227323220E09 +++$+++ I, too, have somewhat of a friend in publishing.  We used to race with Rick Standridge, husband to Stock Car Racing Magazine contributer, Joyce Strandridge.  A picture of our car at Springfield Speedway was used in one of her articles in the April 1985 or 86 issue.  It was an article on caution flags.  The picture was of a car sitting sideways in the middle of the track, with my dad about to nail him.  I, myself, have had a ''Letter to the editor'' published in Circle Track.  It appeared in an issue in 1988.  I can't remember which issue though.  I also wrote the [[Mid America Off Road Association|MAORA]] Newsletter when I was Secretary and Vice President in 2001. <b><i><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ ::I, too, have somewhat of a friend in publishing.  We used to race with Rick Standridge, husband to Stock Car Racing Magazine contributer, Joyce Strandridge.  A picture of our car at Springfield Speedway was used in one of her articles in the April 1985 or 86 issue.  It was an article on caution flags.  The picture was of a car sitting sideways in the middle of the track, with my dad about to nail him.  I, myself, have had a ''Letter to the editor'' published in Circle Track.  It appeared in an issue in 1988.  I can't remember which issue though.  I also wrote the [[Mid America Off Road Association|MAORA]] Newsletter when I was Secretary and Vice President in 2001. <b><i><font color="red">[[User:JLG 2701|JLG]]</font> <font color="blue">[[User talk:JLG 2701|2701]]</font></i></b> 19:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

5639 +++$+++ DonFB +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-20 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.206055200E09 +++$+++ The Wings over the Rockies Museum article is under challenge by another editor for copyright violation. Hopefully, you can help resolve the issue.  +++$+++ The Wings over the Rockies Museum article is under challenge by another editor for copyright violation. Hopefully, you can help resolve the issue. [[User:DonFB|DonFB]] ([[User talk:DonFB|talk]]) 16:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
5640 +++$+++ Chrislk02 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5639 +++$+++ 5639 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.206097320E09 +++$+++ IF you own that website, just as a formality, can you confirm by creating a page or somehow adding text that shows us you are the creator and owner of the page?  Not that I dont trust you, just for formality purposes.  IF you can, can you give me the link?  +++$+++ :IF you own that website, just as a formality, can you confirm by creating a page or somehow adding text that shows us you are the creator and owner of the page?  Not that I dont trust you, just for formality purposes.  IF you can, can you give me the link? [[User:Chrislk02|<font color="1E90FF">'''Chris'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Chrislk02|<font color="4169E1">'''lk02'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Chrislk02|<font color="2A52BE">Chris Kreider</font>]]</sup> 04:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
5641 +++$+++ Chrislk02 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5639 +++$+++ 5640 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.206097560E09 +++$+++ an you also mail the link to permissions-en@wikimedia.org with your statement that you are releasing the content for use?   Please make it out to my attention if possible.  +++$+++ ::an you also mail the link to permissions-en@wikimedia.org with your statement that you are releasing the content for use?   Please make it out to my attention if possible. [[User:Chrislk02|<font color="1E90FF">'''Chris'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Chrislk02|<font color="4169E1">'''lk02'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Chrislk02|<font color="2A52BE">Chris Kreider</font>]]</sup> 04:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
5642 +++$+++ Chrislk02 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5639 +++$+++ 5641 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.206098700E09 +++$+++ You dont even need to edit the page, just send the email to the address above from the email address listed as pagemaster on the page cited.  +++$+++ :::You dont even need to edit the page, just send the email to the address above from the email address listed as pagemaster on the page cited. [[User:Chrislk02|<font color="1E90FF">'''Chris'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Chrislk02|<font color="4169E1">'''lk02'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Chrislk02|<font color="2A52BE">Chris Kreider</font>]]</sup> 04:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
5643 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5639 +++$+++ 5640 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.206101160E09 +++$+++ Aol web page updated and email sent to above address.  +++$+++ :: Aol web page updated and email sent to above address. [[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] ([[User talk:LanceBarber#top|talk]]) 05:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
5644 +++$+++ Chrislk02 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5639 +++$+++ 5643 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.206101340E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Ill update the page now. +++$+++ :::Thanks! Ill update the page now.[[User:Chrislk02|<font color="1E90FF">'''Chris'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Chrislk02|<font color="4169E1">'''lk02'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Chrislk02|<font color="2A52BE">Chris Kreider</font>]]</sup> 05:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
5645 +++$+++ Chrislk02 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5639 +++$+++ 5643 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.206101640E09 +++$+++ Page has been updated.  Thanks again! IF there is anything else I can do for you, please let me know.  +++$+++ :::Page has been updated.  Thanks again! IF there is anything else I can do for you, please let me know. [[User:Chrislk02|<font color="1E90FF">'''Chris'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Chrislk02|<font color="4169E1">'''lk02'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Chrislk02|<font color="2A52BE">Chris Kreider</font>]]</sup> 05:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

515201 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-02 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.243940880E09 +++$+++ The trouble is, when I argue to do something, people think that I am arguing we should do it because someone \"deserves\" it. That's never what I mean, just as nobody ever means that someone really jjjjhed anything. - +++$+++ The trouble is, when I argue to do something, people think that I am arguing we should do it because someone "deserves" it. That's never what I mean, just as nobody ever means that someone really jjjjhed anything. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 04:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
515202 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515201 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-04 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.244183340E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I don't necessarily mean to deny the reality of moral valuations. I just deny that I'm in any position to make them, so I try to define them out of the picture, and then make decisions on practical grounds, proceeding from one or two moral axioms. In particular, I tend to ''define'' each human life as an infinitely valuable expression of the divine, and I define Good Action as that motivated by love of the whole (God) and the parts (one's neighbors). I deny \"free will\" except as a subjective feeling of uncertainty (thus jettisoning moral credit and blame), and identify the Good with the Actual. <p> These are, of course, mutually self-contradictory religious claims that are not subject to testing or proof. Thus, I don't expect anyone in particular to agree with me, and I'm pretty happy when someone does. Also, because they're non-trivial religious claims, I constantly fall short of really living according to them. But, you know, that's why there's always a tomorrow. - +++$+++ ::Yeah, I don't necessarily mean to deny the reality of moral valuations. I just deny that I'm in any position to make them, so I try to define them out of the picture, and then make decisions on practical grounds, proceeding from one or two moral axioms. In particular, I tend to ''define'' each human life as an infinitely valuable expression of the divine, and I define Good Action as that motivated by love of the whole (God) and the parts (one's neighbors). I deny "free will" except as a subjective feeling of uncertainty (thus jettisoning moral credit and blame), and identify the Good with the Actual. <p> These are, of course, mutually self-contradictory religious claims that are not subject to testing or proof. Thus, I don't expect anyone in particular to agree with me, and I'm pretty happy when someone does. Also, because they're non-trivial religious claims, I constantly fall short of really living according to them. But, you know, that's why there's always a tomorrow. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 23:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

529929 +++$+++ DuncanHill +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-21 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.227267180E09 +++$+++ Hi, I have undone your change to the hatnote on [[Plymouth]] - in the past there have been some unfortunate disputes about what should be at Plymouth, how to disambiguate the various Plymouths in the world, etc. There is a recent thread on the talk page about the cars and the hatnote, I do feel it would be best to seek consensus there before making such a change. Best wishes,  +++$+++ Hi, I have undone your change to the hatnote on [[Plymouth]] - in the past there have been some unfortunate disputes about what should be at Plymouth, how to disambiguate the various Plymouths in the world, etc. There is a recent thread on the talk page about the cars and the hatnote, I do feel it would be best to seek consensus there before making such a change. Best wishes, [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 03:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
529930 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529929 +++$+++ 529929 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.227267660E09 +++$+++ I figured it would immediately be undone. I didn't look at the talk page, just did what I think makes sense in the worldview per [[WP:BOLD]]. I don't want to talk about it any more, so don't reply back. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I figured it would immediately be undone. I didn't look at the talk page, just did what I think makes sense in the worldview per [[WP:BOLD]]. I don't want to talk about it any more, so don't reply back. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

267787 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-15 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.203100620E09 +++$+++ Your opinion, Mattisse, is: even if information\/image is wrong, it is evidence in reliable source, but nobody can correct this mistake without your agreement (you call this consensus). You are acting like article owner. But you are it's editor not less not more. Nobody has no private articles in Wiki, you see. In this question we have a consensus, I hope.  +++$+++ Your opinion, Mattisse, is: even if information/image is wrong, it is evidence in reliable source, but nobody can correct this mistake without your agreement (you call this consensus). You are acting like article owner. But you are it's editor not less not more. Nobody has no private articles in Wiki, you see. In this question we have a consensus, I hope. [[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 10:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267788 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.203113460E09 +++$+++ I was informed yesterday by a couple of editors that \"my mistakes\" have been changed and fixed. So I do not know what you are asking me now. You are the first editor to ask my opinion on the matter and I am confused by this. I do not know how to answer your question. What are you asking my opinion on? You have to be more specific, as there could be up to five articles involved. (Don't know the current state now.) Further, it has been made clear to me that my contributions are not wanted by that group of editors.   +++$+++ : I was informed yesterday by a couple of editors that "my mistakes" have been changed and fixed. So I do not know what you are asking me now. You are the first editor to ask my opinion on the matter and I am confused by this. I do not know how to answer your question. What are you asking my opinion on? You have to be more specific, as there could be up to five articles involved. (Don't know the current state now.) Further, it has been made clear to me that my contributions are not wanted by that group of editors.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267789 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ 267788 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.203116340E09 +++$+++ Also, I think you are mistaken about any consensus being required from me. The other changes were make without my consensus, indeed most of the time without any discussion or warning. I would go to an article and find it did not exist anymore because it had been redirected.  I cannot see that my consensus is suddenly required now. I believe your perception is mistaken.   +++$+++ ::Also, I think you are mistaken about any consensus being required from me. The other changes were make without my consensus, indeed most of the time without any discussion or warning. I would go to an article and find it did not exist anymore because it had been redirected.  I cannot see that my consensus is suddenly required now. I believe your perception is mistaken.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267790 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.203116520E09 +++$+++ Citation:\"You did not ask me, politely or otherwise, to \"correct\" my mistake. You merely removed the image from the article and put it up for deletion without consulting me.\" How we can understand this? You could make routine your watchlist checking and notice what happened, isn't it? Your (NASA) image as such is not wrong, but wrong is its tytle, isn't it? You really beleave this is Uvs Nuur?  Even if so  this  image  is not  Uvs Nuur.  Everybody,  you, me, even Latebird can  post it for deletion. But you want be asked for your agreement?  +++$+++ :::::Citation:"You did not ask me, politely or otherwise, to "correct" my mistake. You merely removed the image from the article and put it up for deletion without consulting me." How we can understand this? You could make routine your watchlist checking and notice what happened, isn't it? Your (NASA) image as such is not wrong, but wrong is its tytle, isn't it? You really beleave this is Uvs Nuur?  Even if so  this  image  is not  Uvs Nuur.  Everybody,  you, me, even Latebird can  post it for deletion. But you want be asked for your agreement? [[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 15:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267791 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.203117120E09 +++$+++ I have 1,500 pages on my watchlist. I remove as much as I can everyday. Further, I spend most of my time writing and researching articles when I am on Wikipedia. So, no. I do not see everything on the watchlist. And especially images. I never watch for images, as a problem with an image I have uploaded has never come up before in this manner. I have received four or five bot notes over the years regarding copyright status on my talkpage, but that's it. I have never had an image changed without a note to me on my talkpage.  I had not a clue about Latebird's underground workings and I am still not clear about it. I am glad the image was not speedy deleted as Latebird requested. I will leave it at that.   +++$+++ ::::::I have 1,500 pages on my watchlist. I remove as much as I can everyday. Further, I spend most of my time writing and researching articles when I am on Wikipedia. So, no. I do not see everything on the watchlist. And especially images. I never watch for images, as a problem with an image I have uploaded has never come up before in this manner. I have received four or five bot notes over the years regarding copyright status on my talkpage, but that's it. I have never had an image changed without a note to me on my talkpage.  I had not a clue about Latebird's underground workings and I am still not clear about it. I am glad the image was not speedy deleted as Latebird requested. I will leave it at that.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 15:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267792 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.203120000E09 +++$+++ You have an answer: when it is copyright problem you can resolve it, but you can not make the image of \xdc\xfcreg Nuur the image of Uvs Nuur. The first one has to be deleted. +++$+++ :::::::You have an answer: when it is copyright problem you can resolve it, but you can not make the image of Üüreg Nuur the image of Uvs Nuur. The first one has to be deleted.[[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 16:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267793 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.203120780E09 +++$+++ Yes, all that was explained to me later, after deletions, after the speedy delete  put on the image before any explanation to me, etc. etc. I was operating in a vacuum of information. In any case, those editors have clearly taken over those articles now so the only way I will ever edit one of them again is if I notice that they have incorrectly used a reference I provided.    +++$+++ ::::::::Yes, all that was explained to me later, after deletions, after the speedy delete  put on the image before any explanation to me, etc. etc. I was operating in a vacuum of information. In any case, those editors have clearly taken over those articles now so the only way I will ever edit one of them again is if I notice that they have incorrectly used a reference I provided.   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 16:13, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267794 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.203122820E09 +++$+++ An other one time: you don't have any special rights to decide the future of this image. It is not your image, but NASA. Your is image uploading and naming. You made a mistake. Everybody - you, me, even Latebird can correct this mistake. You are interested in this image fortune? If so - check your watchlist. You don't have a time? Nobody but you can help yourself.  +++$+++ :::::::::An other one time: you don't have any special rights to decide the future of this image. It is not your image, but NASA. Your is image uploading and naming. You made a mistake. Everybody - you, me, even Latebird can correct this mistake. You are interested in this image fortune? If so - check your watchlist. You don't have a time? Nobody but you can help yourself. [[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 16:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267795 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.203123780E09 +++$+++ O.K. Now I know that kind of behavior is possible. I doubt I will be uploading any more for the subject area concerning the group of editors under discussion. However, thank you for your advice if I should find myself involved with these sort of editors again. Actually, my preference is to just move on. I did not realize the viciousness of these editors or I would have done so before. No content on Wikipedia is important enough to undergo this type of treatment. They obviously do not want \"outsiders\" concerned in their area and do not respect an \"outsiders\" opinion. I know that now and will stay away.    +++$+++ ::::::::::O.K. Now I know that kind of behavior is possible. I doubt I will be uploading any more for the subject area concerning the group of editors under discussion. However, thank you for your advice if I should find myself involved with these sort of editors again. Actually, my preference is to just move on. I did not realize the viciousness of these editors or I would have done so before. No content on Wikipedia is important enough to undergo this type of treatment. They obviously do not want "outsiders" concerned in their area and do not respect an "outsiders" opinion. I know that now and will stay away.   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267796 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.203126060E09 +++$+++ I am an outsider in many many fields. I'm sure a lot of Wiki editors make edits in very different spheres. An what? If your behavior is constructive, you want help to improve the WP - you are welcome. For you may be your position in WP is very important. You can defend your opinion with your arguments - but I see your emotions, not arguments...  +++$+++ :::::::::::I am an outsider in many many fields. I'm sure a lot of Wiki editors make edits in very different spheres. An what? If your behavior is constructive, you want help to improve the WP - you are welcome. For you may be your position in WP is very important. You can defend your opinion with your arguments - but I see your emotions, not arguments... [[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 17:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267797 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.203127800E09 +++$+++ I edit in a vast number of fields and only rarely in my own. I admit my reaction to this incident was emotional. I did not have a clue what was happening when suddenly a multitude of editors began Redirecting, Moving, setting up disambig pages (some of these editors appeared to be warring with each other) and I reacted poorly. I should have just bowed out in the face of such behavior. There are so many areas of the world that I have edited peacefully in for a long time.  In the scheme of things this area is not important. I was happy to edit there because the articles are in poor shape and I like cleaning articles up, providing references etc because it is a form of learning about the area. However I am even happier to edit where the atmosphere is calmer and where editors do not require that you speak the native language. In India there were many conflicts over names because of the many languages, religions and ethnic groups there, but somehow the only real trouble was caused by sock puppets and not by editors. I need not trouble you any more. I will stay away from your area.   +++$+++ ::::::::::::I edit in a vast number of fields and only rarely in my own. I admit my reaction to this incident was emotional. I did not have a clue what was happening when suddenly a multitude of editors began Redirecting, Moving, setting up disambig pages (some of these editors appeared to be warring with each other) and I reacted poorly. I should have just bowed out in the face of such behavior. There are so many areas of the world that I have edited peacefully in for a long time.  In the scheme of things this area is not important. I was happy to edit there because the articles are in poor shape and I like cleaning articles up, providing references etc because it is a form of learning about the area. However I am even happier to edit where the atmosphere is calmer and where editors do not require that you speak the native language. In India there were many conflicts over names because of the many languages, religions and ethnic groups there, but somehow the only real trouble was caused by sock puppets and not by editors. I need not trouble you any more. I will stay away from your area.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267798 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.203128820E09 +++$+++ \"where editors do not require that you speak the native language\" - I'm not native English speaker, you see. And Mongolian, and Tuvan. I'm not native speaker in Polish, but I'm editing in Polish WP, German WP, English WP, German WP. Less contributions I've made in my native language - but a lot of wikipedians are translating my edits in their languages... Your edits were translated too, I hope.  +++$+++ :::::::::::::"where editors do not require that you speak the native language" - I'm not native English speaker, you see. And Mongolian, and Tuvan. I'm not native speaker in Polish, but I'm editing in Polish WP, German WP, English WP, German WP. Less contributions I've made in my native language - but a lot of wikipedians are translating my edits in their languages... Your edits were translated too, I hope. [[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 18:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

5647 +++$+++ Plazak +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-28 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.206739740E09 +++$+++ I notice that you created the article [[Manitou Cliff Dwellings Museum]].  However, I notice that there is another article, [[Manitou Cliff Dwellings]].  Shouldn't the two be merged, and a redirect page set up?  Thanks.   +++$+++ I notice that you created the article [[Manitou Cliff Dwellings Museum]].  However, I notice that there is another article, [[Manitou Cliff Dwellings]].  Shouldn't the two be merged, and a redirect page set up?  Thanks.  [[User:Plazak|Plazak]] ([[User talk:Plazak|talk]]) 14:29, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
5648 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5647 +++$+++ 5647 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.206756540E09 +++$+++ Yep, should be merged. Comments MCD Talk page. +++$+++ :Yep, should be merged. Comments MCD Talk page.[[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] ([[User talk:LanceBarber#top|talk]]) 19:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

529937 +++$+++ TheCatalyst31 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529937 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-27 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.227837480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the barnstar, and also thanks for taking all the pictures of the various small communities I created articles for. Those have really been helpful. -- +++$+++ Thanks for the barnstar, and also thanks for taking all the pictures of the various small communities I created articles for. Those have really been helpful. --[[User:TheCatalyst31|TheCatalyst31]] <sup>[[User talk:TheCatalyst31|Reaction]]•[[Special:Contributions/TheCatalyst31|Creation]]</sup> 17:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
529938 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529937 +++$+++ 529937 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.227839400E09 +++$+++ Your welcome. I took the pictures completely independent of what you were doing! I usually noticed that you started an article and then I looked to see if I happened to have taken a picture before. I often had taken one while passing through. I still have to take a pictures of [[Millhome, Wisconsin]] which I pass through several times each year and I frequently visit family in nearby [[Kiel, Wisconsin]]. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Your welcome. I took the pictures completely independent of what you were doing! I usually noticed that you started an article and then I looked to see if I happened to have taken a picture before. I often had taken one while passing through. I still have to take a pictures of [[Millhome, Wisconsin]] which I pass through several times each year and I frequently visit family in nearby [[Kiel, Wisconsin]]. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 18:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

529940 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529940 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-01 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.228177020E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, Sandy asked me to check on whether there will still be a December dispatch for DYK.  I'm not sure what the consensus is on the DYK talk page now - whether for a more inclusive DYK push, Christmas only, or perhaps just encourage people to write holiday-themed articles that would fall into the normal rules.  What do you think is likely going to be done?  +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil, Sandy asked me to check on whether there will still be a December dispatch for DYK.  I'm not sure what the consensus is on the DYK talk page now - whether for a more inclusive DYK push, Christmas only, or perhaps just encourage people to write holiday-themed articles that would fall into the normal rules.  What do you think is likely going to be done? [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 16:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
529941 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529940 +++$+++ 529940 +++$+++ 2008-12-04 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.228392960E09 +++$+++ I'd call it no consensus, so I'd say don't run the article. There was plenty of strong opposition plus plenty of strong support. I don't plan on working on it except if things change. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I'd call it no consensus, so I'd say don't run the article. There was plenty of strong opposition plus plenty of strong support. I don't plan on working on it except if things change. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:16, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
529942 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529940 +++$+++ 529941 +++$+++ 2008-12-05 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.228478580E09 +++$+++ So, we'll keep [[WP:FCDW\/December]] on hold in case it gets a second life?   +++$+++ :: So, we'll keep [[WP:FCDW/December]] on hold in case it gets a second life?  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 04:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
529943 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529940 +++$+++ 529942 +++$+++ 2008-12-05 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.228482840E09 +++$+++ Yes, exactly. I brought it up on the DYK talk page and said that someone else could pick it up if they want to. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Yes, exactly. I brought it up on the DYK talk page and said that someone else could pick it up if they want to. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

5655 +++$+++ ArielGold +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-24 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.243204320E09 +++$+++ Thanks! <small> +++$+++ Thanks! <small>[[user:ArielGold|<font color="8B00FF">'''Ariel'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/ArielGold|<font color="F64A8A">♥</font>]][[User_talk:ArielGold|<font color="007FFF">'''Gold'''</font>]]</small> 15:32, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
5656 +++$+++ ArielGold +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5655 +++$+++ 5655 +++$+++ 2009-05-24 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.243204920E09 +++$+++ Hee hee, no biggie, I just didn't want them tagged! <small> +++$+++ :Hee hee, no biggie, I just didn't want them tagged! <small>[[user:ArielGold|<font color="8B00FF">'''Ariel'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/ArielGold|<font color="F64A8A">♥</font>]][[User_talk:ArielGold|<font color="007FFF">'''Gold'''</font>]]</small> 15:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

267801 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-14 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.203040320E09 +++$+++ I really think it is you who is at fault here, not him. Maybe you need to try to get a bit calm first before striking back, and try to find out who actually did what. Most changes (except article deletions, I think) can be undone rather easily, so maybe if you find out how to do this it might also help in a number of cases. I do not think latebird is against outside editors, in fact he was the one who made me register at WP. There is a problem with inaccuracies and mistakes in Mongolia-related articles (although the situation has improved), and many of these are difficult to sort out, so when we find one that is clear we usually just change it. This is also what is endorsed by [[WP:BOLD]].   +++$+++ I really think it is you who is at fault here, not him. Maybe you need to try to get a bit calm first before striking back, and try to find out who actually did what. Most changes (except article deletions, I think) can be undone rather easily, so maybe if you find out how to do this it might also help in a number of cases. I do not think latebird is against outside editors, in fact he was the one who made me register at WP. There is a problem with inaccuracies and mistakes in Mongolia-related articles (although the situation has improved), and many of these are difficult to sort out, so when we find one that is clear we usually just change it. This is also what is endorsed by [[WP:BOLD]].  [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 17:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267802 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267801 +++$+++ 267801 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.203041700E09 +++$+++ I did undo them.  But a variety of editors, friends of Latebird? jumped in again and made all sorts of changes and redirects again with no explanation, or else very cursory ones. (Luckily I had save a copy of the one I cared about in a sandbox). Not one of them was concerned about content -- just the translation of the Russian name. I guess that is the sole concern here. As I said, I will not be contributing any more content, so I guess Latebird and friends will have to do something besides redirecting and renaming if they want content in their articles. You do not think that I, as the creator and sole editor of these articles since last year, did not deserve some consultation before all this was done? None of these other editors have touched these articles until last week or so, although I created them last year. I have had to recreate [[Ubsunur Hollow]] twice in the last few days. It was originally created last year sometime, but it's history is lost to me through all the redirects and recreations.  [[Ubsunur Hollow Biosphere Reserve]] is one of its incarnations but it, as was the original article was redirected out of existence until I restored it, really for no reason now, as so many other changes have been made. It is impossible to recreate what happened. And  I don't know what happened to the disambig page which someone else made without consultation or consensus giving new names to the articles -- actually that is where [[Ubsunur Hollow Biosphere Reserve]] cam from, so that article is probably linked to it . I am not revealing the other articles as I'd rather they not be messed with by Latebird and friends. Their lack of geological knowledge has promoted their misuse of terms. I have never had this experience before (aside from some sock puppet experiences).   +++$+++ :I did undo them.  But a variety of editors, friends of Latebird? jumped in again and made all sorts of changes and redirects again with no explanation, or else very cursory ones. (Luckily I had save a copy of the one I cared about in a sandbox). Not one of them was concerned about content -- just the translation of the Russian name. I guess that is the sole concern here. As I said, I will not be contributing any more content, so I guess Latebird and friends will have to do something besides redirecting and renaming if they want content in their articles. You do not think that I, as the creator and sole editor of these articles since last year, did not deserve some consultation before all this was done? None of these other editors have touched these articles until last week or so, although I created them last year. I have had to recreate [[Ubsunur Hollow]] twice in the last few days. It was originally created last year sometime, but it's history is lost to me through all the redirects and recreations.  [[Ubsunur Hollow Biosphere Reserve]] is one of its incarnations but it, as was the original article was redirected out of existence until I restored it, really for no reason now, as so many other changes have been made. It is impossible to recreate what happened. And  I don't know what happened to the disambig page which someone else made without consultation or consensus giving new names to the articles -- actually that is where [[Ubsunur Hollow Biosphere Reserve]] cam from, so that article is probably linked to it . I am not revealing the other articles as I'd rather they not be messed with by Latebird and friends. Their lack of geological knowledge has promoted their misuse of terms. I have never had this experience before (aside from some sock puppet experiences).  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267803 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267801 +++$+++ 267802 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.203042660E09 +++$+++ The consultation stuff is usually done on the talk pages, and you seemed aware enough of the recent changes. Of course it does not help when erroneous accusations are thrown around instead of explaining what exactly is wrong with an edit. I think it would really be a good idea to find out how this edit history stuff works, it helps a lot in keeping an article straight. If nothing helps, you can still go to an old version and c&p it. And you can always find an old version (except, as said, when an article is deleted) by looking through the edits you yourself have made in the past. In any case, do not always assume bad faith when someone might just be bold, or when you even may have misunderstood something.  +++$+++ ::The consultation stuff is usually done on the talk pages, and you seemed aware enough of the recent changes. Of course it does not help when erroneous accusations are thrown around instead of explaining what exactly is wrong with an edit. I think it would really be a good idea to find out how this edit history stuff works, it helps a lot in keeping an article straight. If nothing helps, you can still go to an old version and c&p it. And you can always find an old version (except, as said, when an article is deleted) by looking through the edits you yourself have made in the past. In any case, do not always assume bad faith when someone might just be bold, or when you even may have misunderstood something. [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 18:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267804 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267801 +++$+++ 267803 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.203046620E09 +++$+++ Did you read  my many  posts on the several talk pages involved?  +++$+++ :::Did you read  my many  posts on the several talk pages involved? [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267805 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267801 +++$+++ 267804 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.203359520E09 +++$+++ I read your posts, and my impression was that the edits, mergers and moves that pissed you off were usually not done by latebird. Latebird ''did'' rename the Uureg nuur image, but this was entirely justified and actually very necessary (and you even thanked me, though not him, for it).  +++$+++ ::::I read your posts, and my impression was that the edits, mergers and moves that pissed you off were usually not done by latebird. Latebird ''did'' rename the Uureg nuur image, but this was entirely justified and actually very necessary (and you even thanked me, though not him, for it). [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 10:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

529948 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529948 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-06 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.228606020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my talk page. +++$+++ Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my talk page.[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 15:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
529949 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529948 +++$+++ 529948 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.228606200E09 +++$+++ This wasn't the first such message: I got a similar message yesterday from a different IP who is clearly the same person: see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Nyttend&diff=256077709&oldid=256076348 here] before I cleaned it up somewhat.   +++$+++ :This wasn't the first such message: I got a similar message yesterday from a different IP who is clearly the same person: see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nyttend&diff=256077709&oldid=256076348 here] before I cleaned it up somewhat.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 15:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
529950 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529948 +++$+++ 529948 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.228607820E09 +++$+++ Sigh. We appreciate cleanup of sloppy writing. We don't appreciate people who won't work with others. We need people who are willing to discuss things. They are right, we did discuss CDPs vs unincorporated communities vs villages vs cities in Wisconsin. Municipalities in Wisconsin are unusual, so applying national consensus to Wisconsin doesn't work. I respect Nyttend and RFD '''A LOT'''. They were enforcing the consensus that we came up with! If you have a problem with previous consensus, discuss it first and don't revert. The appropriate thing for you to do with wait out the block even though it's on a different IP address. A range block can be arranged if you don't stop logging in an our of your ISP. Then create an account. You'll find that we ALL '''WILL''' be reasonable if you give us a chance! We've all seen lots of people that come here trying to rip apart what we did without understanding what we've discussed. You are showing that same pattern. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Sigh. We appreciate cleanup of sloppy writing. We don't appreciate people who won't work with others. We need people who are willing to discuss things. They are right, we did discuss CDPs vs unincorporated communities vs villages vs cities in Wisconsin. Municipalities in Wisconsin are unusual, so applying national consensus to Wisconsin doesn't work. I respect Nyttend and RFD '''A LOT'''. They were enforcing the consensus that we came up with! If you have a problem with previous consensus, discuss it first and don't revert. The appropriate thing for you to do with wait out the block even though it's on a different IP address. A range block can be arranged if you don't stop logging in an our of your ISP. Then create an account. You'll find that we ALL '''WILL''' be reasonable if you give us a chance! We've all seen lots of people that come here trying to rip apart what we did without understanding what we've discussed. You are showing that same pattern. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 15:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
529951 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529948 +++$+++ 529950 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.228608540E09 +++$+++ FYI, the CDP format that brought up this whole business is not national consensus; Michigan CDPs are this way, largely due to Bkonrad's beliefs, and there are some scattered ones nationwide, but they're very few.  Even in New England, where CDPs are seen least favorably by geography editors, few fit the CDP format that brought this up.   +++$+++ ::FYI, the CDP format that brought up this whole business is not national consensus; Michigan CDPs are this way, largely due to Bkonrad's beliefs, and there are some scattered ones nationwide, but they're very few.  Even in New England, where CDPs are seen least favorably by geography editors, few fit the CDP format that brought this up.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 16:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
529952 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529948 +++$+++ 529951 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.228610460E09 +++$+++ Not exactly clear what you mean: Wisconsin CDPs are just like CDPs in the rest of the country, and they already have [[:Category:Census-designated places in Wisconsin|their own category]].  Or do you mean something that I'm missing?   +++$+++ :::Not exactly clear what you mean: Wisconsin CDPs are just like CDPs in the rest of the country, and they already have [[:Category:Census-designated places in Wisconsin|their own category]].  Or do you mean something that I'm missing?  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 16:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

5661 +++$+++ Davegnz +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5661 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-02 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.251926040E09 +++$+++ What do youhave regarding c\/n on hawker Hurricanes as well as DH Mosquitos  +++$+++ What do youhave regarding c/n on hawker Hurricanes as well as DH Mosquitos [[User:Davegnz|Davegnz]] ([[User talk:Davegnz|talk]]) 14:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
5662 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5661 +++$+++ 5661 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.251990000E09 +++$+++ Check your email for 2 documents, cheers.  +++$+++ :Check your email for 2 documents, cheers. [[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] ([[User talk:LanceBarber#top|talk]]) 08:00, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
5663 +++$+++ Davegnz +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5661 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.252021560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Davegnz|Davegnz]] ([[User talk:Davegnz|talk]]) 16:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

612613 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612613 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.173659940E09 +++$+++ As I hope you may have seen I am attempting to tidy up [[WP:SCOWNB]] by removing old notices and the duplication that has emerged since the creation of  [[WP:SCO]]. One of the latter issues is that there are lists of active Wikipedians on both locations which overlap to a significant degree. As [[WP:SCOWNB]] is ideally a place for announcements I am in process of merging the lists at [[WP:SCO]] and intend to remove the one at [[WP:SCOWNB]] when this is complete. However there are a fair number of Users not on both lists. If you do not wish to have you current [[WP:SCOWNB]] entry re-appear at [[WP:SCO]] please either let me know or edit the latter as appropriate. Thanks for your patience, and continuing support of matters relating to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Scotland|WikiProject Scotland]].  +++$+++ As I hope you may have seen I am attempting to tidy up [[WP:SCOWNB]] by removing old notices and the duplication that has emerged since the creation of  [[WP:SCO]]. One of the latter issues is that there are lists of active Wikipedians on both locations which overlap to a significant degree. As [[WP:SCOWNB]] is ideally a place for announcements I am in process of merging the lists at [[WP:SCO]] and intend to remove the one at [[WP:SCOWNB]] when this is complete. However there are a fair number of Users not on both lists. If you do not wish to have you current [[WP:SCOWNB]] entry re-appear at [[WP:SCO]] please either let me know or edit the latter as appropriate. Thanks for your patience, and continuing support of matters relating to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Scotland|WikiProject Scotland]]. [[User:Ben MacDui|Ben MacDui]] <small>[[User talk:Ben MacDui|(Talk)]]</small> 17:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
612614 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612613 +++$+++ 612613 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.173737760E09 +++$+++ Sounds ok, happy to continue to be listed and gather this will happen without me doing anything, I hope! ...  +++$+++ :Sounds ok, happy to continue to be listed and gather this will happen without me doing anything, I hope! ... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

267808 +++$+++ Latebird +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267808 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-14 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.203036300E09 +++$+++ Dear Mattisse, I'm not willing to tolerate your entirely baseless accusations any longer. The next time you make clearly incorrect claims (like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Ubsunur_Hollow_Biosphere_Reserve&curid=15655963&diff=191426662&oldid=191385585 the last time here]), attributing statements and opinions to me that I never made or held, you will be reported for [[WP:NPA|person attacks]], [[WP:CIVIL|uncivility]], and violation of any other Wikipedia policy that happens to match the specific situation. What you're doing is systematically coming ''closer and closer to libel'', which is no trivial matter. Please be aware that other editors and especially admins have no problem in checking the relevant edit histories and diffs, and I have no problem in providing them, so that any unsubstianted claims by you are trivial to document. My very long patience with your unjustified but exceedingly hostile behaviour is now over. Please get a grip on reality, '''provide diffs for ''anything'' negative you claim about me, or face the consequences'''. Thanks for your understanding. -- +++$+++ Dear Mattisse, I'm not willing to tolerate your entirely baseless accusations any longer. The next time you make clearly incorrect claims (like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ubsunur_Hollow_Biosphere_Reserve&curid=15655963&diff=191426662&oldid=191385585 the last time here]), attributing statements and opinions to me that I never made or held, you will be reported for [[WP:NPA|person attacks]], [[WP:CIVIL|uncivility]], and violation of any other Wikipedia policy that happens to match the specific situation. What you're doing is systematically coming ''closer and closer to libel'', which is no trivial matter. Please be aware that other editors and especially admins have no problem in checking the relevant edit histories and diffs, and I have no problem in providing them, so that any unsubstianted claims by you are trivial to document. My very long patience with your unjustified but exceedingly hostile behaviour is now over. Please get a grip on reality, '''provide diffs for ''anything'' negative you claim about me, or face the consequences'''. Thanks for your understanding. --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|talk]]) 16:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267809 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267808 +++$+++ 267808 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.203036780E09 +++$+++ Do what you want. Until you stop your unilateral changing of articles and requesting deletion of images without consulting me, I cannot consider you other that violating wiki policy on consensus. I feel like I have been putting up with your arbitrary behavior on articles I have worked on for a while and on which you suddenly turn up on and disrupt without consensus.  +++$+++ :Do what you want. Until you stop your unilateral changing of articles and requesting deletion of images without consulting me, I cannot consider you other that violating wiki policy on consensus. I feel like I have been putting up with your arbitrary behavior on articles I have worked on for a while and on which you suddenly turn up on and disrupt without consensus. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 16:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267810 +++$+++ Latebird +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267808 +++$+++ 267809 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.203042420E09 +++$+++ Btw: \"Without consulting you\"? Do you happen to [[WP:OWN]] an image that [[:commons:User:High Contrast|someone else]] [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image:Uvs_nuur.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=8844773 uploaded to the Commons]? And in case you really don't understand that: A request for deletion is a formal way to ask other editors what they think about it, hence the exact opposite of acting unilaterally. Not to mention that I reported about that request [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Ubsunur_Hollow_Biosphere_Reserve&diff=191163614&oldid=191162904 here] for you and other interested editors to see and possibly step in if I should have happened to be mistaken (which, despite your claims to the opposite, wasn't the case). And the image will not be gone, it has already been replaced by [[:commons:Image:Uureg Nuur.jpg|a copy with the correct name]]. -- +++$+++ ::Btw: "Without consulting you"? Do you happen to [[WP:OWN]] an image that [[:commons:User:High Contrast|someone else]] [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Uvs_nuur.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=8844773 uploaded to the Commons]? And in case you really don't understand that: A request for deletion is a formal way to ask other editors what they think about it, hence the exact opposite of acting unilaterally. Not to mention that I reported about that request [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ubsunur_Hollow_Biosphere_Reserve&diff=191163614&oldid=191162904 here] for you and other interested editors to see and possibly step in if I should have happened to be mistaken (which, despite your claims to the opposite, wasn't the case). And the image will not be gone, it has already been replaced by [[:commons:Image:Uureg Nuur.jpg|a copy with the correct name]]. --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|talk]]) 18:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267811 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267808 +++$+++ 267810 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.203042960E09 +++$+++ I don't care enough to wade into the history of this unsavory experience. I know that the joy of creating the articles last year and learning about that area of the world is lost for me. As for the image, I did not know it was in the commons. I uploaded it myself from NASA. I had not seen the image before.   +++$+++ :::I don't care enough to wade into the history of this unsavory experience. I know that the joy of creating the articles last year and learning about that area of the world is lost for me. As for the image, I did not know it was in the commons. I uploaded it myself from NASA. I had not seen the image before.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267812 +++$+++ Latebird +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267808 +++$+++ 267811 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.203046140E09 +++$+++ The experience only became unsavoury because you chose to ignore the history right from the start. That seems to be a sad pattern here: Don't look at what really happened, but instead just scream murder. And whoever you first noticed around will then forever be the scapegoat in your eyes. Time to get back to reality! -- +++$+++ ::::The experience only became unsavoury because you chose to ignore the history right from the start. That seems to be a sad pattern here: Don't look at what really happened, but instead just scream murder. And whoever you first noticed around will then forever be the scapegoat in your eyes. Time to get back to reality! --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|talk]]) 19:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
267813 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267808 +++$+++ 267812 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.203046500E09 +++$+++ Hum. That sounds like a personal attack.   +++$+++ :::::Hum. That sounds like a personal attack.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

5665 +++$+++ PeterWD +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5665 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-18 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.255899480E09 +++$+++ Hi, targeted you 'cos you're the Wikiproject Aviation guy with a declared interest in aircraft museums - not a popular interest?. Today I planned to start from scratch an article for the TAM museum, using recent experience on Havana and Rio museums. Found an article on TAM museum on Portuguese Wikipedia, grabbed a copy of source, translated via Google, then pasted into my sandbox. A few basic tweaks, bit more aircraft data, and it's approaching a reasonable state. I'd appreciate your comments on the method I've used, and any advice, general or specific. +++$+++ Hi, targeted you 'cos you're the Wikiproject Aviation guy with a declared interest in aircraft museums - not a popular interest?. Today I planned to start from scratch an article for the TAM museum, using recent experience on Havana and Rio museums. Found an article on TAM museum on Portuguese Wikipedia, grabbed a copy of source, translated via Google, then pasted into my sandbox. A few basic tweaks, bit more aircraft data, and it's approaching a reasonable state. I'd appreciate your comments on the method I've used, and any advice, general or specific.[[User:PeterWD|PeterWD]] ([[User talk:PeterWD|talk]]) 13:58, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
5666 +++$+++ PeterWD +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5665 +++$+++ 5665 +++$+++ 2009-10-19 08:35:00 +++$+++ 1.255966500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for response. The wide pic was the result of searching Commons, and I just slapped it in at the top temporarily. I plan to use a museum infobox - shouldn't that be a 'standard' practice? The dodgy text is almost unchanged from the crude translation, aircraft data was priority, and I'll be re-writing it all, especially the restaurant work mention.  +++$+++ :Thanks for response. The wide pic was the result of searching Commons, and I just slapped it in at the top temporarily. I plan to use a museum infobox - shouldn't that be a 'standard' practice? The dodgy text is almost unchanged from the crude translation, aircraft data was priority, and I'll be re-writing it all, especially the restaurant work mention. [[User:PeterWD|PeterWD]] ([[User talk:PeterWD|talk]]) 08:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
5667 +++$+++ PeterWD +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5665 +++$+++ 5666 +++$+++ 2009-10-19 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.255992240E09 +++$+++ Update - knocked it into shape, unsure of citing Portuguese Wikipedia, other Portuguese external links, also co-ordinates, but hopefully other editors will deal with that stuff? (No-one has yet edited anything on the Havana article I did on 11 October). +++$+++ ::Update - knocked it into shape, unsure of citing Portuguese Wikipedia, other Portuguese external links, also co-ordinates, but hopefully other editors will deal with that stuff? (No-one has yet edited anything on the Havana article I did on 11 October).[[User:PeterWD|PeterWD]] ([[User talk:PeterWD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
5668 +++$+++ PeterWD +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5665 +++$+++ 5667 +++$+++ 2009-10-20 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.256089020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your tweaks and advice. As a 'green' Wikipedian, I didn't realise until yesterday that any foreign language articles identified as equivalent are listed below the toolbox in the left column. Thanks also for tweaking the Havana article. (Sits back, awaiting other editors' actions). +++$+++ :::Thanks for your tweaks and advice. As a 'green' Wikipedian, I didn't realise until yesterday that any foreign language articles identified as equivalent are listed below the toolbox in the left column. Thanks also for tweaking the Havana article. (Sits back, awaiting other editors' actions).[[User:PeterWD|PeterWD]] ([[User talk:PeterWD|talk]]) 18:37, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

529954 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529954 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-07 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.228716420E09 +++$+++ Hi RoyalBroil-Because of this anon editor-I will be taking a short leave of absence.This individual questione some of the articles I wrote-I mentioned 2 Roman catholic bishops- [[Alessandro Maggiolini]]&[[Ernest Kombo]] and now this individual changing those articles.Ernest Kombo was ordained a Roman catholic priest for the Jesuits this editor changed it to Kombo being ordained a Jesuit priest implying the jesuits are a separate religious group.With some ongoing health problems I do not need the added stress.Would you and Nyttend place watch my user page, etc. I will return-Thanks- +++$+++ Hi RoyalBroil-Because of this anon editor-I will be taking a short leave of absence.This individual questione some of the articles I wrote-I mentioned 2 Roman catholic bishops- [[Alessandro Maggiolini]]&[[Ernest Kombo]] and now this individual changing those articles.Ernest Kombo was ordained a Roman catholic priest for the Jesuits this editor changed it to Kombo being ordained a Jesuit priest implying the jesuits are a separate religious group.With some ongoing health problems I do not need the added stress.Would you and Nyttend place watch my user page, etc. I will return-Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 22:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
529955 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529954 +++$+++ 529954 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.228716660E09 +++$+++ See my note on RFD's talk.   +++$+++ :See my note on RFD's talk.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 22:11, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
529956 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529954 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.228739580E09 +++$+++ I was using an absurd example which had no relation to what you said. I didn't review any of these edits in question. As to which is better, I'd have to see them in context. If there's enough context, the second version is more concise in both cases. RFD does a fine job of writing. There are Wikipedians that do copyediting for [[WP:FA|featured articles]] and even these people find their work being improved occasionally. '''Everyone's''' wording could be improved, including my own, so you shouldn't be complaining that someone is a bad writer. RFD has done a lot of work developing articles on Wisconsin topics. I've never heard him complain about others like you do. By the way, you're the one leaving messages on my talk page - I've only left one message on your talk page. I'm far from harassing you. How about we try to forget about each other? If you would be willing to stick to copyediting and stop complaining about everyone who volunteers their time here, I'll stick to working on an article for 2008 CORR Pro-2 champion Rob MacCachren. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::I was using an absurd example which had no relation to what you said. I didn't review any of these edits in question. As to which is better, I'd have to see them in context. If there's enough context, the second version is more concise in both cases. RFD does a fine job of writing. There are Wikipedians that do copyediting for [[WP:FA|featured articles]] and even these people find their work being improved occasionally. '''Everyone's''' wording could be improved, including my own, so you shouldn't be complaining that someone is a bad writer. RFD has done a lot of work developing articles on Wisconsin topics. I've never heard him complain about others like you do. By the way, you're the one leaving messages on my talk page - I've only left one message on your talk page. I'm far from harassing you. How about we try to forget about each other? If you would be willing to stick to copyediting and stop complaining about everyone who volunteers their time here, I'll stick to working on an article for 2008 CORR Pro-2 champion Rob MacCachren. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:33, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

529957 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529957 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-07 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.228717740E09 +++$+++ Semi protection would be fine! Keep an eye out for the Kombo\\Maggiolini articles.I am a little bemused that this anon editor said the 2 articles were creative then took after myself with bad grammar-spelling-Many thanks- +++$+++ Semi protection would be fine! Keep an eye out for the Kombo\Maggiolini articles.I am a little bemused that this anon editor said the 2 articles were creative then took after myself with bad grammar-spelling-Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 22:29, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
529958 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529957 +++$+++ 529957 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.228739580E09 +++$+++ RFD, remember that everyone's work can be improved, and I think this IP does have good intentions on this topic. Remember the whole \"edit relentlessly\" thing. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :RFD, remember that everyone's work can be improved, and I think this IP does have good intentions on this topic. Remember the whole "edit relentlessly" thing. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:33, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
529959 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529957 +++$+++ 529957 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.228821840E09 +++$+++ I have the perfect example of why you need to register for an account. I have a problem with one of your reversion of my reversion. You don't understand exactly how categories work, and I need to explain it to you, 12. The article is the [[Peshtigo Fire]]. You added the article to [[:Category:Disasters in Wisconsin]] which is not how we do it. The article is already in the [[:Category:Natural disasters in Wisconsin]], which is a subcategory of Disasters in Wisconsin. So if an article is in ANY subcategory is it automatically in every parent category of that subcategory. You can find the guideline at [[Wikipedia:Categorization and subcategories]]. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I have the perfect example of why you need to register for an account. I have a problem with one of your reversion of my reversion. You don't understand exactly how categories work, and I need to explain it to you, 12. The article is the [[Peshtigo Fire]]. You added the article to [[:Category:Disasters in Wisconsin]] which is not how we do it. The article is already in the [[:Category:Natural disasters in Wisconsin]], which is a subcategory of Disasters in Wisconsin. So if an article is in ANY subcategory is it automatically in every parent category of that subcategory. You can find the guideline at [[Wikipedia:Categorization and subcategories]]. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
529960 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529957 +++$+++ 529957 +++$+++ 2008-12-10 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.228906860E09 +++$+++ About your wikistalking comment, I'll give you a '''Strong Support'''. I wish this incident was over. When someone new (especially an IP) draws attention to themself, like you apparently did to yourself, their edits are watched carefully by established editors. I do that too. People want things to be done right and new people have a tendency to things without completely understanding how things work. Things like the subcategorization issue. Time and time again, I've seen people behind IP addresses to cause major problems. Only a small percentage of IP edits are productive anymore. I know you don't want to register for a name (and you don't need to), but it shows a level of dedication that slows down questions about your intentions and it helps smooth out problems like this. A peak behind the scenes. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :About your wikistalking comment, I'll give you a '''Strong Support'''. I wish this incident was over. When someone new (especially an IP) draws attention to themself, like you apparently did to yourself, their edits are watched carefully by established editors. I do that too. People want things to be done right and new people have a tendency to things without completely understanding how things work. Things like the subcategorization issue. Time and time again, I've seen people behind IP addresses to cause major problems. Only a small percentage of IP edits are productive anymore. I know you don't want to register for a name (and you don't need to), but it shows a level of dedication that slows down questions about your intentions and it helps smooth out problems like this. A peak behind the scenes. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

267814 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-15 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.203100620E09 +++$+++ Your opinion, Mattisse, is: even if information\/image is wrong, it is evidence in reliable source, but nobody can correct this mistake without your agreement (you call this consensus). You are acting like article owner. But you are it's editor not less not more. Nobody has no private articles in Wiki, you see. In this question we have a consensus, I hope.  +++$+++ Your opinion, Mattisse, is: even if information/image is wrong, it is evidence in reliable source, but nobody can correct this mistake without your agreement (you call this consensus). You are acting like article owner. But you are it's editor not less not more. Nobody has no private articles in Wiki, you see. In this question we have a consensus, I hope. [[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 10:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267815 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.203113460E09 +++$+++ I was informed yesterday by a couple of editors that \"my mistakes\" have been changed and fixed. So I do not know what you are asking me now. You are the first editor to ask my opinion on the matter and I am confused by this. I do not know how to answer your question. What are you asking my opinion on? You have to be more specific, as there could be up to five articles involved. (Don't know the current state now.) Further, it has been made clear to me that my contributions are not wanted by that group of editors.   +++$+++ : I was informed yesterday by a couple of editors that "my mistakes" have been changed and fixed. So I do not know what you are asking me now. You are the first editor to ask my opinion on the matter and I am confused by this. I do not know how to answer your question. What are you asking my opinion on? You have to be more specific, as there could be up to five articles involved. (Don't know the current state now.) Further, it has been made clear to me that my contributions are not wanted by that group of editors.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267816 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ 267815 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.203116340E09 +++$+++ Also, I think you are mistaken about any consensus being required from me. The other changes were make without my consensus, indeed most of the time without any discussion or warning. I would go to an article and find it did not exist anymore because it had been redirected.  I cannot see that my consensus is suddenly required now. I believe your perception is mistaken.   +++$+++ ::Also, I think you are mistaken about any consensus being required from me. The other changes were make without my consensus, indeed most of the time without any discussion or warning. I would go to an article and find it did not exist anymore because it had been redirected.  I cannot see that my consensus is suddenly required now. I believe your perception is mistaken.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267817 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.203116520E09 +++$+++ Citation:\"You did not ask me, politely or otherwise, to \"correct\" my mistake. You merely removed the image from the article and put it up for deletion without consulting me.\" How we can understand this? You could make routine your watchlist checking and notice what happened, isn't it? Your (NASA) image as such is not wrong, but wrong is its tytle, isn't it? You really beleave this is Uvs Nuur?  Even if so  this  image  is not  Uvs Nuur.  Everybody,  you, me, even Latebird can  post it for deletion. But you want be asked for your agreement?  +++$+++ :::::Citation:"You did not ask me, politely or otherwise, to "correct" my mistake. You merely removed the image from the article and put it up for deletion without consulting me." How we can understand this? You could make routine your watchlist checking and notice what happened, isn't it? Your (NASA) image as such is not wrong, but wrong is its tytle, isn't it? You really beleave this is Uvs Nuur?  Even if so  this  image  is not  Uvs Nuur.  Everybody,  you, me, even Latebird can  post it for deletion. But you want be asked for your agreement? [[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 15:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267818 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.203117120E09 +++$+++ I have 1,500 pages on my watchlist. I remove as much as I can everyday. Further, I spend most of my time writing and researching articles when I am on Wikipedia. So, no. I do not see everything on the watchlist. And especially images. I never watch for images, as a problem with an image I have uploaded has never come up before in this manner. I have received four or five bot notes over the years regarding copyright status on my talkpage, but that's it. I have never had an image changed without a note to me on my talkpage.  I had not a clue about Latebird's underground workings and I am still not clear about it. I am glad the image was not speedy deleted as Latebird requested. I will leave it at that.   +++$+++ ::::::I have 1,500 pages on my watchlist. I remove as much as I can everyday. Further, I spend most of my time writing and researching articles when I am on Wikipedia. So, no. I do not see everything on the watchlist. And especially images. I never watch for images, as a problem with an image I have uploaded has never come up before in this manner. I have received four or five bot notes over the years regarding copyright status on my talkpage, but that's it. I have never had an image changed without a note to me on my talkpage.  I had not a clue about Latebird's underground workings and I am still not clear about it. I am glad the image was not speedy deleted as Latebird requested. I will leave it at that.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 15:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267819 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.203120000E09 +++$+++ You have an answer: when it is copyright problem you can resolve it, but you can not make the image of \xdc\xfcreg Nuur the image of Uvs Nuur. The first one has to be deleted. +++$+++ :::::::You have an answer: when it is copyright problem you can resolve it, but you can not make the image of Üüreg Nuur the image of Uvs Nuur. The first one has to be deleted.[[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 16:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267820 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.203120780E09 +++$+++ Yes, all that was explained to me later, after deletions, after the speedy delete  put on the image before any explanation to me, etc. etc. I was operating in a vacuum of information. In any case, those editors have clearly taken over those articles now so the only way I will ever edit one of them again is if I notice that they have incorrectly used a reference I provided.    +++$+++ ::::::::Yes, all that was explained to me later, after deletions, after the speedy delete  put on the image before any explanation to me, etc. etc. I was operating in a vacuum of information. In any case, those editors have clearly taken over those articles now so the only way I will ever edit one of them again is if I notice that they have incorrectly used a reference I provided.   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 16:13, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267821 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.203122820E09 +++$+++ An other one time: you don't have any special rights to decide the future of this image. It is not your image, but NASA. Your is image uploading and naming. You made a mistake. Everybody - you, me, even Latebird can correct this mistake. You are interested in this image fortune? If so - check your watchlist. You don't have a time? Nobody but you can help yourself.  +++$+++ :::::::::An other one time: you don't have any special rights to decide the future of this image. It is not your image, but NASA. Your is image uploading and naming. You made a mistake. Everybody - you, me, even Latebird can correct this mistake. You are interested in this image fortune? If so - check your watchlist. You don't have a time? Nobody but you can help yourself. [[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 16:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267822 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.203123780E09 +++$+++ O.K. Now I know that kind of behavior is possible. I doubt I will be uploading any more for the subject area concerning the group of editors under discussion. However, thank you for your advice if I should find myself involved with these sort of editors again. Actually, my preference is to just move on. I did not realize the viciousness of these editors or I would have done so before. No content on Wikipedia is important enough to undergo this type of treatment. They obviously do not want \"outsiders\" concerned in their area and do not respect an \"outsiders\" opinion. I know that now and will stay away.    +++$+++ ::::::::::O.K. Now I know that kind of behavior is possible. I doubt I will be uploading any more for the subject area concerning the group of editors under discussion. However, thank you for your advice if I should find myself involved with these sort of editors again. Actually, my preference is to just move on. I did not realize the viciousness of these editors or I would have done so before. No content on Wikipedia is important enough to undergo this type of treatment. They obviously do not want "outsiders" concerned in their area and do not respect an "outsiders" opinion. I know that now and will stay away.   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267823 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.203126060E09 +++$+++ I am an outsider in many many fields. I'm sure a lot of Wiki editors make edits in very different spheres. An what? If your behavior is constructive, you want help to improve the WP - you are welcome. For you may be your position in WP is very important. You can defend your opinion with your arguments - but I see your emotions, not arguments...  +++$+++ :::::::::::I am an outsider in many many fields. I'm sure a lot of Wiki editors make edits in very different spheres. An what? If your behavior is constructive, you want help to improve the WP - you are welcome. For you may be your position in WP is very important. You can defend your opinion with your arguments - but I see your emotions, not arguments... [[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 17:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267824 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.203127800E09 +++$+++ I edit in a vast number of fields and only rarely in my own. I admit my reaction to this incident was emotional. I did not have a clue what was happening when suddenly a multitude of editors began Redirecting, Moving, setting up disambig pages (some of these editors appeared to be warring with each other) and I reacted poorly. I should have just bowed out in the face of such behavior. There are so many areas of the world that I have edited peacefully in for a long time.  In the scheme of things this area is not important. I was happy to edit there because the articles are in poor shape and I like cleaning articles up, providing references etc because it is a form of learning about the area. However I am even happier to edit where the atmosphere is calmer and where editors do not require that you speak the native language. In India there were many conflicts over names because of the many languages, religions and ethnic groups there, but somehow the only real trouble was caused by sock puppets and not by editors. I need not trouble you any more. I will stay away from your area.   +++$+++ ::::::::::::I edit in a vast number of fields and only rarely in my own. I admit my reaction to this incident was emotional. I did not have a clue what was happening when suddenly a multitude of editors began Redirecting, Moving, setting up disambig pages (some of these editors appeared to be warring with each other) and I reacted poorly. I should have just bowed out in the face of such behavior. There are so many areas of the world that I have edited peacefully in for a long time.  In the scheme of things this area is not important. I was happy to edit there because the articles are in poor shape and I like cleaning articles up, providing references etc because it is a form of learning about the area. However I am even happier to edit where the atmosphere is calmer and where editors do not require that you speak the native language. In India there were many conflicts over names because of the many languages, religions and ethnic groups there, but somehow the only real trouble was caused by sock puppets and not by editors. I need not trouble you any more. I will stay away from your area.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267825 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.203128820E09 +++$+++ \"where editors do not require that you speak the native language\" - I'm not native English speaker, you see. And Mongolian, and Tuvan. I'm not native speaker in Polish, but I'm editing in Polish WP, German WP, English WP, German WP. Less contributions I've made in my native language - but a lot of wikipedians are translating my edits in their languages... Your edits were translated too, I hope.  +++$+++ :::::::::::::"where editors do not require that you speak the native language" - I'm not native English speaker, you see. And Mongolian, and Tuvan. I'm not native speaker in Polish, but I'm editing in Polish WP, German WP, English WP, German WP. Less contributions I've made in my native language - but a lot of wikipedians are translating my edits in their languages... Your edits were translated too, I hope. [[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 18:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

529961 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529961 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-09 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.228821840E09 +++$+++ 12, would you be willing to give a high level peer review on an article that I tried for featured article. I would greatly appreciate it. I request this format in the peer review: you to do the review and have me to do the edits (except real basic prose issues). You just leave the comments on the article's talk page. This way forces me as the \"expert\" on the topic to ensure that what you change makes sense. If I undo or decide not to do a change then you leave it alone because there's a reason why I did it. Then we'll negotiate any problems that you find until we are both satisfied. The article is a biography of a dead Wisconsinite who is not well known anymore except in certain circles. There's a good chance that you never heard of this person. The perfect situation for a prose review! I'm looking to have the prose reviewed, not the technical aspects of this person's occupation which was already reviewed by other \"experts\". That being said, I'd like to know what areas are difficult for a non-expert to understand so that they will get improved. Leave me your thoughts and we'll go from here. This request is another perfect example of why you should register for an account. It's very difficult for me to keep leaving messages on my own talk page hoping that you'll find them. You IP changes so I can't leave you a message. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ 12, would you be willing to give a high level peer review on an article that I tried for featured article. I would greatly appreciate it. I request this format in the peer review: you to do the review and have me to do the edits (except real basic prose issues). You just leave the comments on the article's talk page. This way forces me as the "expert" on the topic to ensure that what you change makes sense. If I undo or decide not to do a change then you leave it alone because there's a reason why I did it. Then we'll negotiate any problems that you find until we are both satisfied. The article is a biography of a dead Wisconsinite who is not well known anymore except in certain circles. There's a good chance that you never heard of this person. The perfect situation for a prose review! I'm looking to have the prose reviewed, not the technical aspects of this person's occupation which was already reviewed by other "experts". That being said, I'd like to know what areas are difficult for a non-expert to understand so that they will get improved. Leave me your thoughts and we'll go from here. This request is another perfect example of why you should register for an account. It's very difficult for me to keep leaving messages on my own talk page hoping that you'll find them. You IP changes so I can't leave you a message. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
529962 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529961 +++$+++ 529961 +++$+++ 2008-12-10 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.228906860E09 +++$+++ I wish we had redline capabilities in Wikipedia. I've copied the [[Alan Kulwicki]] article to [[User:Royalbroil\/Sandbox]] for you to edit there (minus the categories). I'll change the real article with cut and paste if I'm satisfied. You can start a section on my talk page with comments and questions. Section headings start with 2 equal signs, then the heading (how about calling it \"Alan Kulwicki article peer review\"), then 2 equal signs. If the article is written right, you should be able to figure out who he was by the lead paragraphs. The rest of the article should explain relevant details about his life without being bogged down. I left a message on my sandbox giving you permission to edit it. It's not always okay to edit someone else's sandbox. This article should be written by the book in the [[WP:MOS|Manual of Style]], so there's probably a reason that every Wiki-format item is done this way. It's been reviewed by many well-established Wiki editors when I nominated it for [[WP:FA|featured article]], but there's always room for improvement (especially since it failed)! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I wish we had redline capabilities in Wikipedia. I've copied the [[Alan Kulwicki]] article to [[User:Royalbroil/Sandbox]] for you to edit there (minus the categories). I'll change the real article with cut and paste if I'm satisfied. You can start a section on my talk page with comments and questions. Section headings start with 2 equal signs, then the heading (how about calling it "Alan Kulwicki article peer review"), then 2 equal signs. If the article is written right, you should be able to figure out who he was by the lead paragraphs. The rest of the article should explain relevant details about his life without being bogged down. I left a message on my sandbox giving you permission to edit it. It's not always okay to edit someone else's sandbox. This article should be written by the book in the [[WP:MOS|Manual of Style]], so there's probably a reason that every Wiki-format item is done this way. It's been reviewed by many well-established Wiki editors when I nominated it for [[WP:FA|featured article]], but there's always room for improvement (especially since it failed)! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
529963 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529961 +++$+++ 529962 +++$+++ 2008-12-11 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.228992660E09 +++$+++ AWESOME changes! These are significant improvements to what I had written. I wish I had asked you to edit the real article or edited the copy. I was anticipating that you would edit the copy in the sandbox, not create a copy below it. I didn't have to read through your footnotes to understand the reason for most changes. Your wording is MUCH cleaner and you did a much better job with varying the sentence structure. My immediately laughed and said \"duh!\" with the \"He turned around the car\" phrase. I saw the problem without reading your comment. He didn't stand outside the car and spin around the car or anything like that (LOL!). I'll leave comments below your markup. Thank you so much! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::AWESOME changes! These are significant improvements to what I had written. I wish I had asked you to edit the real article or edited the copy. I was anticipating that you would edit the copy in the sandbox, not create a copy below it. I didn't have to read through your footnotes to understand the reason for most changes. Your wording is MUCH cleaner and you did a much better job with varying the sentence structure. My immediately laughed and said "duh!" with the "He turned around the car" phrase. I saw the problem without reading your comment. He didn't stand outside the car and spin around the car or anything like that (LOL!). I'll leave comments below your markup. Thank you so much! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:51, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
529964 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529961 +++$+++ 529963 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.230064740E09 +++$+++ Done. I left messages on the version in my sandbox. Please review and change the original as needed. Thanks! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Done. I left messages on the version in my sandbox. Please review and change the original as needed. Thanks! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:39, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

481543 +++$+++ 194.82.45.23 +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ 481543 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-26 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.164552060E09 +++$+++ That wasn't a test, actually, but an addition of information. -- +++$+++ That wasn't a test, actually, but an addition of information. --[[User:194.82.45.23|194.82.45.23]] 06:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
481544 +++$+++ 194.82.45.23 +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ 481543 +++$+++ 481543 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.164552180E09 +++$+++ Okay, I see what you mean. -- +++$+++ : Okay, I see what you mean. --[[User:194.82.45.23|194.82.45.23]] 06:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

5677 +++$+++ Maury Markowitz +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5677 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-12 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.294865880E09 +++$+++ Check out the [[Talk:Allison_J35]] page. Something odd, or very interesting, is going on...  +++$+++ Check out the [[Talk:Allison_J35]] page. Something odd, or very interesting, is going on... [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 12:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
5678 +++$+++ Maury Markowitz +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5677 +++$+++ 5677 +++$+++ 2011-01-17 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.295294100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for getting to this one Lance!  +++$+++ :Thanks for getting to this one Lance! [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 11:55, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

5680 +++$+++ Bwmoll3 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-21 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.298334300E09 +++$+++ Hi.   I have a lot more information on that squadron which I was about to add.  Don't want to overwrite what you just included.    +++$+++ Hi.   I have a lot more information on that squadron which I was about to add.  Don't want to overwrite what you just included.   [[User:Bwmoll3|Bwmoll3]] ([[User talk:Bwmoll3|talk]]) 16:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
5681 +++$+++ Bwmoll3 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5680 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-21 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.298335440E09 +++$+++ All finished.   I included what you just added as well  Take care ...   +++$+++ :: All finished.   I included what you just added as well  Take care ...  [[User:Bwmoll3|Bwmoll3]] ([[User talk:Bwmoll3|talk]]) 16:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
5682 +++$+++ Bwmoll3 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5680 +++$+++ 5680 +++$+++ 2011-02-21 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.298336280E09 +++$+++ No problem.  have been working on ADC stuff for about 2 months now.  Just happened to be working on these types of units this morning.   Also updated the list you created as well [[List of United States Air Force defense systems evaluation squadrons]].   Take care...  +++$+++ : No problem.  have been working on ADC stuff for about 2 months now.  Just happened to be working on these types of units this morning.   Also updated the list you created as well [[List of United States Air Force defense systems evaluation squadrons]].   Take care... [[User:Bwmoll3|Bwmoll3]] ([[User talk:Bwmoll3|talk]]) 16:58, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
5683 +++$+++ Bwmoll3 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5680 +++$+++ 5680 +++$+++ 2011-02-21 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.298338980E09 +++$+++ Yup.   Noticed you have an interest in [[NORAD]].   Did some work on that page the other day, and have tied in the history to how the Air Defense Command eventually became today's NORAD, writing pages about the various units and organizations of ADTAC as well.   Also wrote up a few things about the [[Joint Surveillance System]] and the old ADC radar stations of the Cold War.   Enjoy...   +++$+++ : Yup.   Noticed you have an interest in [[NORAD]].   Did some work on that page the other day, and have tied in the history to how the Air Defense Command eventually became today's NORAD, writing pages about the various units and organizations of ADTAC as well.   Also wrote up a few things about the [[Joint Surveillance System]] and the old ADC radar stations of the Cold War.   Enjoy...  [[User:Bwmoll3|Bwmoll3]] ([[User talk:Bwmoll3|talk]]) 17:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

267826 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267826 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-15 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.203130560E09 +++$+++ Truthfully, the issue has never come up. As I mentioned, India had a lot of naming disagreements. Eventually these were worked out, in most cases, with the decision to use the English version of names since this is an English Wikipedia and because these names were popular in search engines. They also made the decision to use World Heritage Site names for World Heritage Sites. I think the openness of India has resulted in the greater number and sophistication of their articles compared to many countries. I have edited articles about countries on almost every continent in the world, South America, Africa, Asia, United States, Caribbean ... and on many subjects and created many articles. In cases where someone disagreed with what I wrote, they did not change it without discussion first. Even many Russian articles, [[Lake Baikal]] for example, I worked on with no problems and created many articles related to that article, other lakes, rivers, mountains etc. without this sort of conflict. Perhaps I have just been lucky. Regards,  +++$+++ Truthfully, the issue has never come up. As I mentioned, India had a lot of naming disagreements. Eventually these were worked out, in most cases, with the decision to use the English version of names since this is an English Wikipedia and because these names were popular in search engines. They also made the decision to use World Heritage Site names for World Heritage Sites. I think the openness of India has resulted in the greater number and sophistication of their articles compared to many countries. I have edited articles about countries on almost every continent in the world, South America, Africa, Asia, United States, Caribbean ... and on many subjects and created many articles. In cases where someone disagreed with what I wrote, they did not change it without discussion first. Even many Russian articles, [[Lake Baikal]] for example, I worked on with no problems and created many articles related to that article, other lakes, rivers, mountains etc. without this sort of conflict. Perhaps I have just been lucky. Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 18:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
267827 +++$+++ Bogomolov.PL +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267826 +++$+++ 267826 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.203360960E09 +++$+++ Uvs Nuur case indicates a problem presence:  Mongolian and Russian term for the number of orographic\/geomorphologic objects are the same, but English translations in WP are basin, depression, hollow and valley. And we need respect official names for the nonorographic objects (natural reserves) even their names differ to orographic\/geomorphologic name. This is English language\/En:Wiki problem: Mongols and Russians have no problem in this case.  +++$+++ :Uvs Nuur case indicates a problem presence:  Mongolian and Russian term for the number of orographic/geomorphologic objects are the same, but English translations in WP are basin, depression, hollow and valley. And we need respect official names for the nonorographic objects (natural reserves) even their names differ to orographic/geomorphologic name. This is English language/En:Wiki problem: Mongols and Russians have no problem in this case. [[User:Bogomolov.PL|Bogomolov.PL]] ([[User talk:Bogomolov.PL|talk]]) 10:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

5684 +++$+++ Bwmoll3 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-03 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.299183060E09 +++$+++ I like it :)  Edited the emblem to give it a transparent background.. looks good otherwise..  Brent +++$+++ I like it :)  Edited the emblem to give it a transparent background.. looks good otherwise..  Brent[[User:Bwmoll3|Bwmoll3]] ([[User talk:Bwmoll3|talk]]) 12:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
5685 +++$+++ Bwmoll3 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5684 +++$+++ 5684 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.299198480E09 +++$+++ Very Welcome.  I just ran the emblem though photoshop and took out the background, made it transparent.  good show :)  +++$+++ : Very Welcome.  I just ran the emblem though photoshop and took out the background, made it transparent.  good show :) [[User:Bwmoll3|Bwmoll3]] ([[User talk:Bwmoll3|talk]]) 16:28, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

5686 +++$+++ Peterstrempel +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-30 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.301497140E09 +++$+++ Regards <span style=\"color: #366; font-family: serif; font-weight: bold;\"> +++$+++ Regards <span style="color: #366; font-family: serif; font-weight: bold;">[[user:Peterstrempel|<font color="#366" >Peter S Strempel</font>]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[user_talk:Peterstrempel|<font color="#366">Talk</font>]]</span>  07:59, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
5687 +++$+++  +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5686 +++$+++ 5686 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.301498280E09 +++$+++ I'm reverting your talk page additions because the discussion was closed... no need to reinvent the wheel. :-)  +++$+++ :I'm reverting your talk page additions because the discussion was closed... no need to reinvent the wheel. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 08:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

5688 +++$+++ Blueboar +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-01 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.301689800E09 +++$+++ Regarding your closure at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Grand Lodge of Iowa building]]... I agree with the closure and the keep determination... but would you be willing to amend your closure comments to note that the consensus to Keep was based on the move to [[Iowa Masonic Library and Museum\u200e]].  Thanks.  +++$+++ Regarding your closure at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Lodge of Iowa building]]... I agree with the closure and the keep determination... but would you be willing to amend your closure comments to note that the consensus to Keep was based on the move to [[Iowa Masonic Library and Museum‎]].  Thanks. [[User:Blueboar|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar|talk]]) 13:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
5689 +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5688 +++$+++ 5688 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.301700060E09 +++$+++ Yes, I agree, I will ammend. +++$+++ :Yes, I agree, I will ammend.[[User:LanceBarber|LanceBarber]] ([[User talk:LanceBarber#top|talk]]) 16:21, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
5690 +++$+++ Blueboar +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5688 +++$+++ 5689 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.301733000E09 +++$+++ Obviously, this is now a moot point.  But thanks.  +++$+++ ::Obviously, this is now a moot point.  But thanks. [[User:Blueboar|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar|talk]]) 01:30, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

529977 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-24 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.230158640E09 +++$+++ |align=\"center\"|<big>'''W'''<\/big>herever you are, and whether you're celebrating something or not, there is always a reason to spread the holiday spirit! So, may you have a great day, and may all your wishes be fulfilled in 2009!  +++$+++ |align="center"|<big>'''W'''</big>herever you are, and whether you're celebrating something or not, there is always a reason to spread the holiday spirit! So, may you have a great day, and may all your wishes be fulfilled in 2009! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 14:44, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
529978 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529977 +++$+++ 529977 +++$+++ 2008-12-24 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.230169260E09 +++$+++ Thank you, and I wish all who read this a Merry Christmas! For those who do not have Christian culture\/beliefs, I wish a Happy New Year! May 2009 be a great year for all. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thank you, and I wish all who read this a Merry Christmas! For those who do not have Christian culture/beliefs, I wish a Happy New Year! May 2009 be a great year for all. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 17:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

267835 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-18 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.203332580E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" |  I award Mattisse the Law Barnstar for her incredible work on [[Rogers v. Okin]] and the numerous law-related articles that have been created and improved through her dedication to Wikipedia. &mdash; +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" |  I award Mattisse the Law Barnstar for her incredible work on [[Rogers v. Okin]] and the numerous law-related articles that have been created and improved through her dedication to Wikipedia. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 03:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
267836 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267835 +++$+++ 267835 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.203385620E09 +++$+++ Thank for the barnstar!  +++$+++ :Thank for the barnstar! [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:47, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

5692 +++$+++ Khakiandmauve +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-16 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.305589920E09 +++$+++ I don't see a connection between the [[ideal gas law]] and the [[Max Q]] articles that would warrant See Also links between the two.  Could you explain that to me?   +++$+++ I don't see a connection between the [[ideal gas law]] and the [[Max Q]] articles that would warrant See Also links between the two.  Could you explain that to me?  [[User:Khakiandmauve|Khakiandmauve]] ([[User talk:Khakiandmauve|talk]]) 16:52, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
5693 +++$+++ Khakiandmauve +++$+++ LanceBarber +++$+++ 5692 +++$+++ 5692 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.305662520E09 +++$+++ I think the more natural place to link to is [[dynamic pressure]], rather than [[Max Q]], but I'm not sure that's a good fit, either.  Note that the dynamic pressure article already includes a link in the text back to the ideal gas law article. +++$+++ :I think the more natural place to link to is [[dynamic pressure]], rather than [[Max Q]], but I'm not sure that's a good fit, either.  Note that the dynamic pressure article already includes a link in the text back to the ideal gas law article.[[User:Khakiandmauve|Khakiandmauve]] ([[User talk:Khakiandmauve|talk]]) 13:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

267837 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-19 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.203414720E09 +++$+++ Cheers.--<strong> +++$+++ Cheers.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 01:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
267838 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267837 +++$+++ 267837 +++$+++ 2008-02-19 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.203415800E09 +++$+++ I don't absolutely hate your guts. I admire you very much. If it were not for your [[Song Dynasty]] article, a whole world would not have been opened to me. I'm sorry that our entanglement ended up the way it did. I am just slower than you. I have to put the pieces together as I am learning.  We both went over the edge, I think. (Maybe we are each a little temperamental.) My true apologies to you.  +++$+++ :I don't absolutely hate your guts. I admire you very much. If it were not for your [[Song Dynasty]] article, a whole world would not have been opened to me. I'm sorry that our entanglement ended up the way it did. I am just slower than you. I have to put the pieces together as I am learning.  We both went over the edge, I think. (Maybe we are each a little temperamental.) My true apologies to you. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 02:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

529982 +++$+++ davidwr +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-31 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.230731520E09 +++$+++ Re: Suntag's RFA.  Each question gives supporters a reason to oppose, and opposers a reason to support.  Sure, there are people who will see a show-stopper and oppose and that's final, but in general, if I'm neutral, the more questions asked, the more likely I am to get off the fence.  As it happened, I stayed on the fence throughout Suntag's RFA, but I did follow all the questions and they were helpful.   +++$+++ Re: Suntag's RFA.  Each question gives supporters a reason to oppose, and opposers a reason to support.  Sure, there are people who will see a show-stopper and oppose and that's final, but in general, if I'm neutral, the more questions asked, the more likely I am to get off the fence.  As it happened, I stayed on the fence throughout Suntag's RFA, but I did follow all the questions and they were helpful.  [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])/([[Special:Emailuser/davidwr|e-mail]])</small></small> 05:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
529983 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529982 +++$+++ 529982 +++$+++ 2008-12-31 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.230735120E09 +++$+++ A few months ago there was discussion about the RFA process and why people don't want to run. One of the major reasons was because so many questions get asked. This RFA is a great example of too many questions being asked. Back and forth, lots of followups, etc. I usually only comment on RFAs when I know the contributor's work. Otherwise I sit on the fence. Anyone can be made to look good or bad by the tone and number of questions, so I respectfully disagree with you. I think that questions should not be the primary basis used by commenters. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :A few months ago there was discussion about the RFA process and why people don't want to run. One of the major reasons was because so many questions get asked. This RFA is a great example of too many questions being asked. Back and forth, lots of followups, etc. I usually only comment on RFAs when I know the contributor's work. Otherwise I sit on the fence. Anyone can be made to look good or bad by the tone and number of questions, so I respectfully disagree with you. I think that questions should not be the primary basis used by commenters. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 06:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
529984 +++$+++ Balloonman +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529982 +++$+++ 529983 +++$+++ 2008-12-31 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.230786180E09 +++$+++ Questions very rarely impact the way I vote.  I make my decisions based upon the edits that the user has made in the past.  Only when those edits don't satisfy me, will I look at the questions... and that is generally to get a specific answer to a specific question I observed during my review.---'''[[User:Balloonman|<font color=\"purple\">Balloonman<\/font>]]''' ''[[User talk:Balloonman|<b><sup><small>PoppaBalloon<\/small><\/sup><\/b>]]''<small> +++$+++ ::Questions very rarely impact the way I vote.  I make my decisions based upon the edits that the user has made in the past.  Only when those edits don't satisfy me, will I look at the questions... and that is generally to get a specific answer to a specific question I observed during my review.---'''[[User:Balloonman|<font color="purple">Balloonman</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:Balloonman|<b><sup><small>PoppaBalloon</small></sup></b>]]''<small>[[User:Balloonman/CSD Survey|Take the CSD Survey]]</small> 21:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
529985 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529982 +++$+++ 529984 +++$+++ 2009-01-02 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.230932880E09 +++$+++ I was going to oppose, but changed my mind. I feel it is unfair to put people up for adminship who have been on the project such a short time. Six months is not in my opinion long enough and nominating such people is practically setting them up for disappointment. I don't think I could support any candidate who has not been on the project at least nine months, and preferably twelve.  +++$+++ :::I was going to oppose, but changed my mind. I feel it is unfair to put people up for adminship who have been on the project such a short time. Six months is not in my opinion long enough and nominating such people is practically setting them up for disappointment. I don't think I could support any candidate who has not been on the project at least nine months, and preferably twelve. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 13:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
529986 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529982 +++$+++ 529985 +++$+++ 2009-01-03 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.230970320E09 +++$+++ Gato, that's a very sensible reason to oppose. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::Gato, that's a very sensible reason to oppose. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

267841 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-21 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.203609420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 07:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
267842 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267841 +++$+++ 267841 +++$+++ 2008-02-21 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.203628380E09 +++$+++ Probably I would have to do quite a bit of alteration in wording. Is that O.K?   +++$+++ :Probably I would have to do quite a bit of alteration in wording. Is that O.K?  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
267843 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267841 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-21 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.203636900E09 +++$+++ Of course you can. However, the editor's comment on the talkpage is a valid one, from Wikipedia's point of view. So it would help the article to eliminate some of what that editor is objecting to. Can you save a copy for yourself?  +++$+++ :::Of course you can. However, the editor's comment on the talkpage is a valid one, from Wikipedia's point of view. So it would help the article to eliminate some of what that editor is objecting to. Can you save a copy for yourself? [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 15:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
267844 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267841 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-21 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.203637380E09 +++$+++ Yes my friend. I agree with you. If you are talking about the article, I have the whole thing too much copied in my heart and on my mind. Now a days I have turned to a thanatologist! I cant think f any other research than this. Even, now a days I smell, from the comments of other thanatologist or psychologist, I might have turned to the father of this very small portion of this science. I wish I knew English better!! If you are ever interested in writing, let me know. We might just be a good team for a good scientific book in English. +++$+++ :::: Yes my friend. I agree with you. If you are talking about the article, I have the whole thing too much copied in my heart and on my mind. Now a days I have turned to a thanatologist! I cant think f any other research than this. Even, now a days I smell, from the comments of other thanatologist or psychologist, I might have turned to the father of this very small portion of this science. I wish I knew English better!! If you are ever interested in writing, let me know. We might just be a good team for a good scientific book in English.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 15:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

529988 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-02 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.230901380E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your hard work on DYK! ''' +++$+++ Thanks again for your hard work on DYK! '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 05:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
529989 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 529988 +++$+++ 529988 +++$+++ 2009-01-02 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.230902100E09 +++$+++ I thank you back, YellowMonkey, for all your help at DYK and your helpful advice for FA. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I thank you back, YellowMonkey, for all your help at DYK and your helpful advice for FA. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

267846 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-22 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.203703800E09 +++$+++ Nice editing Mattisse! I like it! Carry on!! +++$+++ Nice editing Mattisse! I like it! Carry on!![[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 10:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
267847 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267846 +++$+++ 267846 +++$+++ 2008-02-22 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.203706620E09 +++$+++ Also I want to invite you to take part in my new book by submitting an essay (300 to 3000 words) with your views on the subject that you are editing now, or my hypotheses or on human mortality or immortality or death. Even the subject can be one that is different from mine but related to it. I will include that essay in my book and publish it. You'll have at least one month to write such. In fact I'm trying to build a community on this subject consisting of mental health personals. You can also write to me by e-mails at hmanjur@bttb.net.bd   +++$+++ : Also I want to invite you to take part in my new book by submitting an essay (300 to 3000 words) with your views on the subject that you are editing now, or my hypotheses or on human mortality or immortality or death. Even the subject can be one that is different from mine but related to it. I will include that essay in my book and publish it. You'll have at least one month to write such. In fact I'm trying to build a community on this subject consisting of mental health personals. You can also write to me by e-mails at hmanjur@bttb.net.bd  [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 10:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
267848 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267846 +++$+++ 267846 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.203817740E09 +++$+++ Also there is no way that the article has doubled in length .... you have to be calculating the size taking into account the pictures, post prose - which should not be considered when weighing the articles size.  Where is a link to the supposed size of the article? For my part I feel there is an irrational panic taking place with reference to the article's size that I feel is unnecessary. If anything the total time it takes to scroll down through the article has been DECREASED not increased (try it for yourself).  +++$+++ *Also there is no way that the article has doubled in length .... you have to be calculating the size taking into account the pictures, post prose - which should not be considered when weighing the articles size.  Where is a link to the supposed size of the article? For my part I feel there is an irrational panic taking place with reference to the article's size that I feel is unnecessary. If anything the total time it takes to scroll down through the article has been DECREASED not increased (try it for yourself). [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 17:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
267849 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267846 +++$+++ 267846 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.203818160E09 +++$+++ O.K. Lets get some consensus on it. The article is listed as #24 on Wikipedia's list of the 500 longest articles. We need to get more people involved and see how they feel.   +++$+++ :O.K. Lets get some consensus on it. The article is listed as #24 on Wikipedia's list of the 500 longest articles. We need to get more people involved and see how they feel.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 17:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
267850 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267846 +++$+++ 267849 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.203821460E09 +++$+++ The prose of the article is only 69 KB or so (now probably smaller) - size is not the issue. Those lists are deceptive because they take into account all material post-prose - much of which I have edited out now.  Also I trust you to make revisions on prose content so feel free.   +++$+++ :: The prose of the article is only 69 KB or so (now probably smaller) - size is not the issue. Those lists are deceptive because they take into account all material post-prose - much of which I have edited out now.  Also I trust you to make revisions on prose content so feel free.  [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 18:51, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

5704 +++$+++ Jennavecia +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-27 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.225161180E09 +++$+++ <s>Please do not list addresses, phone numbers, or other such information in articles. [[User:Jennavecia|<span style=\"font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#9400D3\">'''\u0644'''enna<\/span>]][[User talk:Jennavecia|<span style=\"font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#00BFFF\">vecia<\/span>]] 19:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC)  +++$+++ <s>Please do not list addresses, phone numbers, or other such information in articles. [[User:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#9400D3">'''ل'''enna</span>]][[User talk:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#00BFFF">vecia</span>]] 19:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC) [[User:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#9400D3">'''ل'''enna</span>]][[User talk:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#00BFFF">vecia</span>]] 19:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
5705 +++$+++ Jennavecia +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5704 +++$+++ 5704 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.225161600E09 +++$+++ Just kidding! :D As you were! Carry on!! >_>  +++$+++ :Just kidding! :D As you were! Carry on!! >_> [[User:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#9400D3">'''ل'''enna</span>]][[User talk:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#00BFFF">vecia</span>]] 19:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

5706 +++$+++ THEN WHO WAS PHONE? +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-31 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.225436580E09 +++$+++ Hi! Could you comment on the talk page as to why you feel the material that the IP was removing should be allowed to stay. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi! Could you comment on the talk page as to why you feel the material that the IP was removing should be allowed to stay. Thanks, [[User:THEN WHO WAS PHONE?|THEN WHO WAS PHONE?]] ([[User talk:THEN WHO WAS PHONE?|talk]]) 00:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
5707 +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5706 +++$+++ 5706 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.225436700E09 +++$+++ Just did. I'd agree that it is unreliable after looking closer at it.  +++$+++ :Just did. I'd agree that it is unreliable after looking closer at it. [[User:sionus|<font color="black">S</font><font color="gray">i</font><font color="darkgray">on</font><font color="gray">u</font><font color="black">s</font>]] [[User Talk:Sionus|[<font color="steelblue">talk</font>]]] 00:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

5708 +++$+++ Jeff99999 +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-31 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.225437240E09 +++$+++ One question - how come the page is marked as \"in dispute\"?  The data that is currently posted isn't in dispute, correct?   +++$+++ One question - how come the page is marked as "in dispute"?  The data that is currently posted isn't in dispute, correct?  [[User:Jeff99999|Jeff99999]] ([[User talk:Jeff99999|talk]]) 00:14, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
5709 +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5708 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.225456740E09 +++$+++ The page still is under dispute as to whether or not the additional information is valid. I agree and others agree that it needs citations and reliability before being added but the contributor of that content clearly doesn't. If the conversation about that content dies off just remove the mark.  +++$+++ ::The page still is under dispute as to whether or not the additional information is valid. I agree and others agree that it needs citations and reliability before being added but the contributor of that content clearly doesn't. If the conversation about that content dies off just remove the mark. [[User:sionus|<font color="black">S</font><font color="gray">i</font><font color="darkgray">on</font><font color="gray">u</font><font color="black">s</font>]] [[User Talk:Sionus|[<font color="steelblue">talk</font>]]] 05:39, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
5710 +++$+++ PeeJay2K3 +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5708 +++$+++ 5708 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.225515480E09 +++$+++ The first decent person he's met on here? Yeah, he told me that once too. Look how that turned out ;) \u2013  +++$+++ :The first decent person he's met on here? Yeah, he told me that once too. Look how that turned out ;) – [[User:PeeJay2K3|Pee]][[User talk:PeeJay2K3|Jay]] 21:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

44642 +++$+++ Jabrona +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-20 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.303358460E09 +++$+++ Hey SummerPhD it's me Jabrona. I got her date of birth off of IMDB and I assumed it wasn't false since the date of birth of actors from that site are usually accurate. Sorry for the mishap. There's a similar issue regarding Michelle Thomas' date of birth being September 23, 1969 when there's a needed source for that even though it's been confirmed by people who know her personally. -  +++$+++ Hey SummerPhD it's me Jabrona. I got her date of birth off of IMDB and I assumed it wasn't false since the date of birth of actors from that site are usually accurate. Sorry for the mishap. There's a similar issue regarding Michelle Thomas' date of birth being September 23, 1969 when there's a needed source for that even though it's been confirmed by people who know her personally. - [[User talk:Jabrona|Jabrona]] 021:01, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
44643 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44642 +++$+++ 44642 +++$+++ 2011-04-20 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.303360440E09 +++$+++ IMDb is not a reliable source for biographical information. We do not take information from a user edited site (like IMDb) assuming it is \"usually accurate\". Please see [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]]. Thanks. -  +++$+++ :IMDb is not a reliable source for biographical information. We do not take information from a user edited site (like IMDb) assuming it is "usually accurate". Please see [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]]. Thanks. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 21:34, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
44644 +++$+++ Jabrona +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44642 +++$+++ 44643 +++$+++ 2011-04-20 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.303366440E09 +++$+++ I understand. I didn't really see IMDB as a user-edited site considering it's not like you can make a simple edit like on here since there are steps that must be confirmed before actual changing can take place, so yeah. But again, sorry for the mishap. -  +++$+++ ::I understand. I didn't really see IMDB as a user-edited site considering it's not like you can make a simple edit like on here since there are steps that must be confirmed before actual changing can take place, so yeah. But again, sorry for the mishap. - [[User talk:Jabrona|Jabrona]] 023:14, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
44645 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44642 +++$+++ 44644 +++$+++ 2011-04-21 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.303370520E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard\/Archive_17#Is_IMDb_a_reliable_source.3F|Just]]  [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard\/Archive_17#The_Internet_Movie_Database_Bio_Pages|for]]  [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard\/Archive_17#IMDb_-_is_there_any_common_result_if_IMDb_is_reliable_or_not.3F|the]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard\/Archive_16#IMDB|record]], [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Films\/Archive_14#IMDb_as_Valid_Reference_Material|we]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard\/Archive_18#SABRE|have]] [[Wikipedia:Citing_IMDb|discussed]] [[Talk:Films_considered_the_greatest_ever#IMDB_user_ratings| imdb]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard\/Archive_12#Is_ign.com_a_RS_.3F|before]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard\/Archive_11#IMDB_Pro|and]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard\/Archive_10#Film_Credit_Guidelines|decided]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard\/Archive_9#y.21m|it]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard\/Archive_5#IMDB|isn't]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard\/Archive_2#Reporting_a_birthday_with_conflicting_sources|a]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard\/Archive_1|reliable]] [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Zachary_Jaydon_(3rd_nomination)|source.]]  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Philip_Ridley&action=historysubmit&diff=357207167&oldid=357206587 For example...] -  +++$+++ :::[[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_17#Is_IMDb_a_reliable_source.3F|Just]]  [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_17#The_Internet_Movie_Database_Bio_Pages|for]]  [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_17#IMDb_-_is_there_any_common_result_if_IMDb_is_reliable_or_not.3F|the]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_16#IMDB|record]], [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Films/Archive_14#IMDb_as_Valid_Reference_Material|we]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_18#SABRE|have]] [[Wikipedia:Citing_IMDb|discussed]] [[Talk:Films_considered_the_greatest_ever#IMDB_user_ratings| imdb]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_12#Is_ign.com_a_RS_.3F|before]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_11#IMDB_Pro|and]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_10#Film_Credit_Guidelines|decided]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_9#y.21m|it]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_5#IMDB|isn't]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_2#Reporting_a_birthday_with_conflicting_sources|a]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_1|reliable]] [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zachary_Jaydon_(3rd_nomination)|source.]]  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philip_Ridley&action=historysubmit&diff=357207167&oldid=357206587 For example...] - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 00:22, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

267854 +++$+++ 66.71.100.4 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267854 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-26 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.204030920E09 +++$+++ Nice job on the NPD page.  I'd like to point out, however, that I (66.71.100.4) didn't make the recent edits that you identified as vandalism and reverted.  In fact, 75.209.45.45 made those changes, and you actually reverted to the version that contains my edits (22:12, 23 February 2008 66.71.100.4).  Just a small error, but I wanted to point it out to clarify my purpose.  Thanks, and keep up the good work.   [[Special:Contributions\/66.71.100.4|66.71.100.4]] ( +++$+++ Nice job on the NPD page.  I'd like to point out, however, that I (66.71.100.4) didn't make the recent edits that you identified as vandalism and reverted.  In fact, 75.209.45.45 made those changes, and you actually reverted to the version that contains my edits (22:12, 23 February 2008 66.71.100.4).  Just a small error, but I wanted to point it out to clarify my purpose.  Thanks, and keep up the good work.   [[Special:Contributions/66.71.100.4|66.71.100.4]] ([[User talk:66.71.100.4|talk]]) 05:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
267855 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267854 +++$+++ 267854 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.204060620E09 +++$+++ Sorry, you are right. [[User:75.209.45.45]] made the edits.  My apologies to you. I removed the warming template.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Sorry, you are right. [[User:75.209.45.45]] made the edits.  My apologies to you. I removed the warming template.  Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

612621 +++$+++ Calgacus +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-16 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.174107960E09 +++$+++ The Welsh call the Picts \"Britons\", but curiously they use an archaic form of the word; this is more curious because the Irish call them ''Cruithne'', likewise an archaic form of the word \"Britons\". Both languages replace their words for Britain by the Dark Ages. I've heard it suggested that they got this distinction because they were the \"Free Britons\", and that the Welsh to the south ceased to think of themselves really as Britons, but as Romans or Romano-Britons. What's even funnier is that when one Welshman translated the ''Vita Griffini Fillii Conani'' (\"Life of Gruffudd ap Cynan\") into Welsh, he translated ''Scotia'' as \"Prydein\", possibly meaning Prydyn (Pictland). This is interesting because it was the 12TH CENTURY! I don't have many of my early medieval books with me, but Angus would likely have all the references you need if you want to talk about the Priteni in the Picts article ... though it seems to be covered in that article's second paragraph. ''' +++$+++ The Welsh call the Picts "Britons", but curiously they use an archaic form of the word; this is more curious because the Irish call them ''Cruithne'', likewise an archaic form of the word "Britons". Both languages replace their words for Britain by the Dark Ages. I've heard it suggested that they got this distinction because they were the "Free Britons", and that the Welsh to the south ceased to think of themselves really as Britons, but as Romans or Romano-Britons. What's even funnier is that when one Welshman translated the ''Vita Griffini Fillii Conani'' ("Life of Gruffudd ap Cynan") into Welsh, he translated ''Scotia'' as "Prydein", possibly meaning Prydyn (Pictland). This is interesting because it was the 12TH CENTURY! I don't have many of my early medieval books with me, but Angus would likely have all the references you need if you want to talk about the Priteni in the Picts article ... though it seems to be covered in that article's second paragraph. '''[[User:Calgacus|Calgacus]] (''[[User talk:Calgacus|ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ]]'')''' 22:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
612622 +++$+++ Calgacus +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612621 +++$+++ 612621 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.174109700E09 +++$+++ The Romans tended to switch Ps to Bs, which is how Pritannia became Britannia. You are right about the old British identity; that's what the men of the North are, the Old British, as Tacitus called them, \"the last men on earth, the last of the free\". Ironically, the Picts we know, those of the Pictish Kingdom (as the predecessors of the \"Scots\") are probably more descended from the [[Verturiones]] than the Caledones; and there is some evidences that the Caledones (south of the Mounth) were actually more British than \"Pictish\", whatever that means of course. ''' +++$+++ : The Romans tended to switch Ps to Bs, which is how Pritannia became Britannia. You are right about the old British identity; that's what the men of the North are, the Old British, as Tacitus called them, "the last men on earth, the last of the free". Ironically, the Picts we know, those of the Pictish Kingdom (as the predecessors of the "Scots") are probably more descended from the [[Verturiones]] than the Caledones; and there is some evidences that the Caledones (south of the Mounth) were actually more British than "Pictish", whatever that means of course. '''[[User:Calgacus|Calgacus]] (''[[User talk:Calgacus|ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ]]'')''' 22:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

267856 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267856 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.203169620E09 +++$+++ Please see my comments at [[Talk:Cognitive_liberty#Rogers_v._Okin]].  I know you have an interest in this topic, so any knowledge you can share would be appreciated. &mdash; +++$+++ Please see my comments at [[Talk:Cognitive_liberty#Rogers_v._Okin]].  I know you have an interest in this topic, so any knowledge you can share would be appreciated. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 05:47, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
267857 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267856 +++$+++ 267856 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.203202740E09 +++$+++ I started the article and will at least do a brief version, depending on what info I can come up with. There are several other legal cases revolving around the same issue that may be appropriate to your [[Cognitive liberty]] article.   +++$+++ :I started the article and will at least do a brief version, depending on what info I can come up with. There are several other legal cases revolving around the same issue that may be appropriate to your [[Cognitive liberty]] article.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 14:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
267858 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267856 +++$+++ 267857 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.203220380E09 +++$+++ [[Rogers v. Okin]] - is there a particular issue you want included in the article?   +++$+++ ::[[Rogers v. Okin]] - is there a particular issue you want included in the article?  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 19:53, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
267859 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267856 +++$+++ 267858 +++$+++ 2008-02-17 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.203274140E09 +++$+++ Wow, great work Mattisse!  I'm stunned.  Yes, there is an issue, but I'm not able to address it until tomorrow or Monday.  Thank you for helping me!  I'll get back to you in a day or so.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Wow, great work Mattisse!  I'm stunned.  Yes, there is an issue, but I'm not able to address it until tomorrow or Monday.  Thank you for helping me!  I'll get back to you in a day or so.  &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 10:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

525240 +++$+++ JP06035 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.172283660E09 +++$+++ I thank you for taking your time to express your opinion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at any time. <sub>\u2514<\/sub><sup>''' +++$+++ I thank you for taking your time to express your opinion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at any time. <sub>└</sub><sup>'''[[User:JP06035|<font color="#0084C9">Jared</font>]]'''</sup><sub>┘</sub><sup>┌</sup><sub>''[[User Talk:JP06035|<font color="#009E49">talk</font>]]''</sub><sup>┐</sup>&ensp;18:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
525241 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525240 +++$+++ 525240 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.172446500E09 +++$+++ Response at [[User talk:Thierry Soussi]]. -- +++$+++ :Response at [[User talk:Thierry Soussi]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 15:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

5714 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Hey Sionus, I edited the [[Argumentum ad populum|Argumentum ad populum]] page where you advance that Islam is believed by the most people. In fact, Christianity is the most 'popular' religion. I cited a source this time, directly pulled from [[Christianity#Demographics|Christianity\/Demographics]]. Peace! 7:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ Hey Sionus, I edited the [[Argumentum ad populum|Argumentum ad populum]] page where you advance that Islam is believed by the most people. In fact, Christianity is the most 'popular' religion. I cited a source this time, directly pulled from [[Christianity#Demographics|Christianity/Demographics]]. Peace! 7:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
5715 +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5714 +++$+++ 5714 +++$+++ 2008-11-19 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.227141060E09 +++$+++ Ok. My edits were reverts due to vandalism.  +++$+++ :Ok. My edits were reverts due to vandalism. [[User:sionus|<font color="black">S</font><font color="gray">i</font><font color="darkgray">on</font><font color="gray">u</font><font color="black">s</font>]] [[User Talk:Sionus|[<font color="steelblue">talk</font>]]] 16:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

267860 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-26 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.204025940E09 +++$+++ Ok, sorry for the delay.  Basically, when we are talking about cognitive liberty, we are talking about the right to [[freedom of thought]] which is applied to many different topics, from [[women's rights]] (Fish & Popal 2003) to drugs (Richard Boire and the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics).  Since we are discussing a drug-related case, I'll stick to that topic.  Groups like the [[Drug Policy Alliance]] have raised the issue of \"coercive pharmacotherapy\"  in relation to prisoners and people in U.S. psychiatric institutions.  These cognitive liberty concerns are similar to those discussed in the emerging field of [[neuroethics]];  Walter Glannon in ''Bioethics and the Brain'' describes coercive pharmacotherapy as \"forced behavior control\". According to Glannon, \"In ''Rogers v. Okin'' (1979) a Massachusetts district court found that patients had the right to refuse psychotropic drugs if they interfered with their ability to think.  The court argued that the Constitution recognizes a liberty interest in avoiding the unwanted administration of antipsychotic drugs.\"  This particular \"[[liberty interest]]\" in the legal and mental health literature refers to the due process clause of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendment]] which protects the [[Privacy laws in the United States|right to privacy]].  Another related case is [[Rennie v. Klein]].  So, the issue is one of liberty interest in Rogers v. Okin.  This is also discussed by cognitive liberty proponents in relation to [[Bee v. Greaves]], where the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]], \"protects the communication of ideas, which itself implies protection of the capacity to produce ideas\".  So I would like to introduce discussion of the liberty interest in Rogers v. Okin.  Bore and others tie this to cognitive liberty in various publications, so I can provide additional secondary sources linking the two topics. &mdash; +++$+++ Ok, sorry for the delay.  Basically, when we are talking about cognitive liberty, we are talking about the right to [[freedom of thought]] which is applied to many different topics, from [[women's rights]] (Fish & Popal 2003) to drugs (Richard Boire and the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics).  Since we are discussing a drug-related case, I'll stick to that topic.  Groups like the [[Drug Policy Alliance]] have raised the issue of "coercive pharmacotherapy"  in relation to prisoners and people in U.S. psychiatric institutions.  These cognitive liberty concerns are similar to those discussed in the emerging field of [[neuroethics]];  Walter Glannon in ''Bioethics and the Brain'' describes coercive pharmacotherapy as "forced behavior control". According to Glannon, "In ''Rogers v. Okin'' (1979) a Massachusetts district court found that patients had the right to refuse psychotropic drugs if they interfered with their ability to think.  The court argued that the Constitution recognizes a liberty interest in avoiding the unwanted administration of antipsychotic drugs."  This particular "[[liberty interest]]" in the legal and mental health literature refers to the due process clause of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendment]] which protects the [[Privacy laws in the United States|right to privacy]].  Another related case is [[Rennie v. Klein]].  So, the issue is one of liberty interest in Rogers v. Okin.  This is also discussed by cognitive liberty proponents in relation to [[Bee v. Greaves]], where the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]], "protects the communication of ideas, which itself implies protection of the capacity to produce ideas".  So I would like to introduce discussion of the liberty interest in Rogers v. Okin.  Bore and others tie this to cognitive liberty in various publications, so I can provide additional secondary sources linking the two topics. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 03:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
267861 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267860 +++$+++ 267860 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.204062600E09 +++$+++ [[Riggins v. Nevada]], [[Perry v. Louisiana]], [[Washington v. Harper]], [[Sell v. United States]], plus [[Kansas v. Hendricks]] (involuntary civil commitment), [[Jackson v. Indiana]], [[Frendak v. United States]] (involuntary imposition of the insanity defense). Also, involuntary examination, [[Estelle v. Smith]]. Regards,  +++$+++ *[[Riggins v. Nevada]], [[Perry v. Louisiana]], [[Washington v. Harper]], [[Sell v. United States]], plus [[Kansas v. Hendricks]] (involuntary civil commitment), [[Jackson v. Indiana]], [[Frendak v. United States]] (involuntary imposition of the insanity defense). Also, involuntary examination, [[Estelle v. Smith]]. Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 13:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

530005 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-18 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.232286240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help with the list. I'm really getting the impression that it's going to be a ''huge'' article, probably added to incrementally as needs be for years to come. <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ Thanks for your help with the list. I'm really getting the impression that it's going to be a ''huge'' article, probably added to incrementally as needs be for years to come. <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 05:44, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
530006 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530005 +++$+++ 530005 +++$+++ 2009-01-19 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.232365020E09 +++$+++ I'm going to guess it's not eligible for DYK, if not, \"tank-slapper\" could get us a good entry... <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ :I'm going to guess it's not eligible for DYK, if not, "tank-slapper" could get us a good entry... <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 03:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
530007 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530005 +++$+++ 530006 +++$+++ 2009-01-19 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.232367960E09 +++$+++ I had thought about it! Lists need to have a 2000 character introduction, so it won't be eligible for DYK. I was looking at sandbagging for the DYK fact. I had to Google \"tank slapper\" because I never heard of it before. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I had thought about it! Lists need to have a 2000 character introduction, so it won't be eligible for DYK. I was looking at sandbagging for the DYK fact. I had to Google "tank slapper" because I never heard of it before. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
530008 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530005 +++$+++ 530007 +++$+++ 2009-01-19 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.232369580E09 +++$+++ 2000 characters? Give me a couple of hours, and I'll use my mad prose skills to come up with it. We'd have to split credit about five ways at the moment! <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ :::2000 characters? Give me a couple of hours, and I'll use my mad prose skills to come up with it. We'd have to split credit about five ways at the moment! <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 04:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

5718 +++$+++ SchfiftyThree +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-22 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.227410760E09 +++$+++ Keep up with those reverts! :-)  +++$+++ Keep up with those reverts! :-) [[User:SchfiftyThree|<font color="4169E1">'''SchfiftyThree'''</font>]] [[User talk:SchfiftyThree|<sup><font color="green">'''(talk!)'''</font></sup>]] 19:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
5719 +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5718 +++$+++ 5718 +++$+++ 2008-11-24 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.227578160E09 +++$+++ It wasn't fact, it was personal opinion and vandalism. Of which I see you've made again recently.  +++$+++ :It wasn't fact, it was personal opinion and vandalism. Of which I see you've made again recently. [[User:sionus|<font color="black">S</font><font color="gray">i</font><font color="darkgray">on</font><font color="gray">u</font><font color="black">s</font>]] [[User Talk:Sionus|[<font color="steelblue">talk</font>]]] 17:56, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

5720 +++$+++ Inferno, Lord of Penguins +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-03 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.228374780E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I mistook that as him changing \"do\" to \"don't\". Thanks for letting me know though, so I can take the warning off his page. Much obliged  +++$+++ Sorry, I mistook that as him changing "do" to "don't". Thanks for letting me know though, so I can take the warning off his page. Much obliged [[User:Inferno, Lord of Penguins|<span style="color:#FF0000">Inferno, </span>]] [[User talk:Inferno, Lord of Penguins|<span style="color:#FFA500">Lord of </span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Inferno, Lord of Penguins|<span style="color:#FFFF00">Penguins</span>]] 23:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
5721 +++$+++ Inferno, Lord of Penguins +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5720 +++$+++ 5720 +++$+++ 2008-12-03 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.228374960E09 +++$+++ Looks like the user was indef blocked for vandalism anyways, however.  +++$+++ :Looks like the user was indef blocked for vandalism anyways, however. [[User:Inferno, Lord of Penguins|<span style="color:#FF0000">Inferno, </span>]] [[User talk:Inferno, Lord of Penguins|<span style="color:#FFA500">Lord of </span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Inferno, Lord of Penguins|<span style="color:#FFFF00">Penguins</span>]] 23:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
5722 +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ Sionus +++$+++ 5720 +++$+++ 5721 +++$+++ 2008-12-03 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.228375260E09 +++$+++ I figured he would be  +++$+++ ::I figured he would be [[User:sionus|<font color="black">S</font><font color="gray">i</font><font color="darkgray">on</font><font color="gray">u</font><font color="black">s</font>]] [[User Talk:Sionus|[<font color="steelblue">talk</font>]]] 23:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

530009 +++$+++ Exxolon +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530009 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.232935860E09 +++$+++ You do realise this is complete rubbish - it's already been speedily deleted once if you check the logs. I can't see any advantage to having this crap floating around for 5 days - can you?  +++$+++ You do realise this is complete rubbish - it's already been speedily deleted once if you check the logs. I can't see any advantage to having this crap floating around for 5 days - can you? [[User:Exxolon|Exxolon]] ([[User talk:Exxolon|talk]]) 18:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
530010 +++$+++ Exxolon +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530009 +++$+++ 530009 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.232936400E09 +++$+++ \"I've heard of it\" violates so many policies it's not even funny. [[WP:RS]], [[WP:VERIFY]], [[WP:OR]] - if admins think \"someone's heard of it\" is reason to keep something we are in deep shit.  +++$+++ :"I've heard of it" violates so many policies it's not even funny. [[WP:RS]], [[WP:VERIFY]], [[WP:OR]] - if admins think "someone's heard of it" is reason to keep something we are in deep shit. [[User:Exxolon|Exxolon]] ([[User talk:Exxolon|talk]]) 18:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

530013 +++$+++ Proofreader77 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.232950680E09 +++$+++ P.P.S. ''If I could have a cup of adrenaline instead of coffee, I'd chose that.'' :)  +++$+++ P.P.S. ''If I could have a cup of adrenaline instead of coffee, I'd chose that.'' :) [[User:Proofreader77|Proofreader77]] ([[User talk:Proofreader77|talk]]) 22:18, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
530014 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530013 +++$+++ 530013 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.232954640E09 +++$+++ I've never heard of this idea before. It sounds interesting. I think you should propose it, but I don't know where. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I've never heard of this idea before. It sounds interesting. I think you should propose it, but I don't know where. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
530015 +++$+++ Proofreader77 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530013 +++$+++ 530014 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.232961480E09 +++$+++ I'll make that a back-burner project ... which if it ever comes to fruition ... will come to be known as the Wikipedia technological advance .. inspired by the Great Midwest Trivia Contest cheating scandal of '09. Cheers!  +++$+++ :: I'll make that a back-burner project ... which if it ever comes to fruition ... will come to be known as the Wikipedia technological advance .. inspired by the Great Midwest Trivia Contest cheating scandal of '09. Cheers! [[User:Proofreader77|Proofreader77]] ([[User talk:Proofreader77|talk]]) 01:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

5726 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5726 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-24 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.287989220E09 +++$+++ Why should these aquariums point to each other in the See also section? One closed in 1962 and the other did not open until 1992. One is in PA and one is on NJ (granted, \"just across the river\" from each other) But they are about 3 miles and 30 years apart if my measurements and math are correct. If they have something in common warranting an entry in the See Also section, SHouldn't this be reflected in the text somehow (and cited)?  +++$+++ Why should these aquariums point to each other in the See also section? One closed in 1962 and the other did not open until 1992. One is in PA and one is on NJ (granted, "just across the river" from each other) But they are about 3 miles and 30 years apart if my measurements and math are correct. If they have something in common warranting an entry in the See Also section, SHouldn't this be reflected in the text somehow (and cited)? [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers|talk]]) 23:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
5727 +++$+++ RevelationDirect +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5726 +++$+++ 5726 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.287990840E09 +++$+++ These are the two aquariums (I don't like \"aquaria\") that both serve greater Philly so I thought readers of one would be likely to be interested in the other.  I suppose I could create a city-based category like was done with [[:Category:Aquaria in Paris]] but I didn't want to create a two-article cat with no room for growth, like was done with [[:Category:Aquaria in Paris]].  If you feel strongly about it--I don't--feel free to remove the links.  +++$+++ :These are the two aquariums (I don't like "aquaria") that both serve greater Philly so I thought readers of one would be likely to be interested in the other.  I suppose I could create a city-based category like was done with [[:Category:Aquaria in Paris]] but I didn't want to create a two-article cat with no room for growth, like was done with [[:Category:Aquaria in Paris]].  If you feel strongly about it--I don't--feel free to remove the links. [[User:RevelationDirect|RevelationDirect]] ([[User talk:RevelationDirect#top|talk]]) 00:14, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
5728 +++$+++ RevelationDirect +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5726 +++$+++ 5727 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.287991320E09 +++$+++ I guess the [[Brandywine Zoo]] could technically bring a city metro cat to 3 articles based on location but it's not drawing people from King of Prussia and Cherry hill. They're lucky if people drive across Wilmington and I say that as a member. +++$+++ ::I guess the [[Brandywine Zoo]] could technically bring a city metro cat to 3 articles based on location but it's not drawing people from King of Prussia and Cherry hill. They're lucky if people drive across Wilmington and I say that as a member.[[User:RevelationDirect|RevelationDirect]] ([[User talk:RevelationDirect|talk]]) 00:22, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
5729 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5726 +++$+++ 5728 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.287997020E09 +++$+++ Well, 30 years is a bit of a gap, but I won't argue the point. I've never been to the area, but on the map it DOES seem to be one big city, and the navboxes don't cover the overlap. We might want to think about a \"Greater philly zoos and Aquariums\" navbox (please don't hold me to the name -- someone local to the area would probably do a lot better).  +++$+++ :::Well, 30 years is a bit of a gap, but I won't argue the point. I've never been to the area, but on the map it DOES seem to be one big city, and the navboxes don't cover the overlap. We might want to think about a "Greater philly zoos and Aquariums" navbox (please don't hold me to the name -- someone local to the area would probably do a lot better). [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers#top|talk]]) 01:57, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

530016 +++$+++ Johnfos +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-26 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.232959200E09 +++$+++ Hi! I started this article some time ago and noticed that you have made some significant contributions.  I'd like to invite your further input please, as I plan to submit it at [[WP:GAN]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi! I started this article some time ago and noticed that you have made some significant contributions.  I'd like to invite your further input please, as I plan to submit it at [[WP:GAN]]. Thanks. [[User:Johnfos|Johnfos]] ([[User talk:Johnfos|talk]]) 00:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
530017 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530016 +++$+++ 530016 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.232960640E09 +++$+++ Sure I'd love to help. Right now it's VERY FAR from Good Article status. I'll add it to my watchlist. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Sure I'd love to help. Right now it's VERY FAR from Good Article status. I'll add it to my watchlist. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

87481 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87481 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-25 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.296006660E09 +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincluded-->  +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincluded--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 17:51, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
87482 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87481 +++$+++ 87481 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.296006900E09 +++$+++ Sorry CorenSearchBot, you're confused.  +++$+++ :Sorry CorenSearchBot, you're confused. [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 17:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

267874 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267874 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-28 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.204199100E09 +++$+++ I do not want to participate in this kind of atmosphere. You demand a certain type of citation. You demand other things.  This is getting unpleasant. Although I know you like to joke at our expense on your talk page, I cannot wait for the day that I can take it off my watchlist.    Sorry to let the others down, but I regret I ever started the [[Che Guevara]] thing. I will stay away from any further articles you are involved in.   +++$+++ I do not want to participate in this kind of atmosphere. You demand a certain type of citation. You demand other things.  This is getting unpleasant. Although I know you like to joke at our expense on your talk page, I cannot wait for the day that I can take it off my watchlist.    Sorry to let the others down, but I regret I ever started the [[Che Guevara]] thing. I will stay away from any further articles you are involved in.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 03:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
267875 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267874 +++$+++ 267874 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.204199340E09 +++$+++ Demand?  Joke at your expense?  Where? Mattisse, are you being oversensitive because you misread a response I made to VT as if it was directed at you, and misinterpreted?  Since I am about to embark on a lot of work on CG tomorrow, please let me know if we should call it off.  I'll respect whatever you decide; CG was your nomination, and I've no vested interest other than my offer to help.   +++$+++ :Demand?  Joke at your expense?  Where? Mattisse, are you being oversensitive because you misread a response I made to VT as if it was directed at you, and misinterpreted?  Since I am about to embark on a lot of work on CG tomorrow, please let me know if we should call it off.  I'll respect whatever you decide; CG was your nomination, and I've no vested interest other than my offer to help.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
267876 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267874 +++$+++ 267875 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.204200960E09 +++$+++ It was my nomination but it is not my article. You should not make a decision based on my behavior. My favorite editors, Polaris999 and Jmabel, are involved even though they said they would never be and I would never let them down. It is getting unpleasant though.  You and I have such different values that it makes working with you difficult for me.  The CITE issue was a shocking insight. Today has been a bad day. I feel I will longer get any pleasure from working on the article. The idea is becoming  aversive.  I will be glad when I don't  have to glance through your talk any more as I do not like what I see. Sorry! We are opposites.  +++$+++ ::It was my nomination but it is not my article. You should not make a decision based on my behavior. My favorite editors, Polaris999 and Jmabel, are involved even though they said they would never be and I would never let them down. It is getting unpleasant though.  You and I have such different values that it makes working with you difficult for me.  The CITE issue was a shocking insight. Today has been a bad day. I feel I will longer get any pleasure from working on the article. The idea is becoming  aversive.  I will be glad when I don't  have to glance through your talk any more as I do not like what I see. Sorry! We are opposites. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 04:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
267877 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267874 +++$+++ 267876 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.204201140E09 +++$+++ Since you're uncomfortable working with me, obviously I must bow out, and I have.  Good luck,  +++$+++ :::Since you're uncomfortable working with me, obviously I must bow out, and I have.  Good luck, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 04:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
267878 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267874 +++$+++ 267877 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.204201560E09 +++$+++ I feel it would be unfair to the others if you did that. This article is not about me. All I did was nominate for FAR. The rest was the work of others. You should not penalize those good editors, as much as they have been through,  because of me.  +++$+++ ::::I feel it would be unfair to the others if you did that. This article is not about me. All I did was nominate for FAR. The rest was the work of others. You should not penalize those good editors, as much as they have been through,  because of me. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] 04:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

5731 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5731 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-01 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.291238460E09 +++$+++ And from where did you get this information? I'm sure it was probably a Web site somewhere and you could have just included the URL with yhour post. If I don't see this information in a day or two I am going to remove the information. You don't needs to know how to do proper citations. Just put a URL (or probably two), and I will turn it into a proper citation. Information like this should be from the site of the awarding institution, not the zoo site. Thank you.  +++$+++ And from where did you get this information? I'm sure it was probably a Web site somewhere and you could have just included the URL with yhour post. If I don't see this information in a day or two I am going to remove the information. You don't needs to know how to do proper citations. Just put a URL (or probably two), and I will turn it into a proper citation. Information like this should be from the site of the awarding institution, not the zoo site. Thank you. [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers|talk]]) 13:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
5732 +++$+++ 121.216.63.116 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5731 +++$+++ 5731 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.291272960E09 +++$+++ You are a proper little wikilawyer aren't you. The reason I stopped editing this site after many thousands of edits. Just can't be bothered with this type of aggressive attitude and arrogant nonsense. The organisations web site is quite adequate as a source for this type of information, as it is reasonable to presume that a responsible organisation would not lie about this type of thing. If you want to verify the ecotourism award go to http:\/\/www.victoriantourismawards.com.au\/2010-award-winners\/2010-award-winners.html#cat5. The Keep Australia Beautiful site no longer lists winners pre 2010 but as you can see a picture of the award being held by the zoos director on their website I think we can take that as reasonable verification. And while I am not a newcomer, you had no way of knowing that, so you should review [[Wikipedia:DBTN]]. And while we are at it the proper course for information you want sourced is not to threaten the anon who put it up with removing it within 24 hours, but rather to tag it and leave it for the community to find appropriate sources. --[[Special:Contributions\/121.216.63.116|121.216.63.116]] ( +++$+++ :You are a proper little wikilawyer aren't you. The reason I stopped editing this site after many thousands of edits. Just can't be bothered with this type of aggressive attitude and arrogant nonsense. The organisations web site is quite adequate as a source for this type of information, as it is reasonable to presume that a responsible organisation would not lie about this type of thing. If you want to verify the ecotourism award go to http://www.victoriantourismawards.com.au/2010-award-winners/2010-award-winners.html#cat5. The Keep Australia Beautiful site no longer lists winners pre 2010 but as you can see a picture of the award being held by the zoos director on their website I think we can take that as reasonable verification. And while I am not a newcomer, you had no way of knowing that, so you should review [[Wikipedia:DBTN]]. And while we are at it the proper course for information you want sourced is not to threaten the anon who put it up with removing it within 24 hours, but rather to tag it and leave it for the community to find appropriate sources. --[[Special:Contributions/121.216.63.116|121.216.63.116]] ([[User talk:121.216.63.116|talk]]) 22:56, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
5733 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5731 +++$+++ 5732 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.291276260E09 +++$+++ Well, speaking of wikilawyers... I will try to be less forceful in the future and just ask for the information, which presumably the poster (whether a newbie or not) has at their disposal. I apologize for my tone.  +++$+++ ::Well, speaking of wikilawyers... I will try to be less forceful in the future and just ask for the information, which presumably the poster (whether a newbie or not) has at their disposal. I apologize for my tone. [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers#top|talk]]) 23:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
5734 +++$+++ 121.216.63.116 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5731 +++$+++ 5733 +++$+++ 2010-12-02 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.291316760E09 +++$+++ Probably a good idea, and thank you for the apology. --[[Special:Contributions\/121.216.63.116|121.216.63.116]] ( +++$+++ :::Probably a good idea, and thank you for the apology. --[[Special:Contributions/121.216.63.116|121.216.63.116]] ([[User talk:121.216.63.116|talk]]) 11:06, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

471559 +++$+++ JdH +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-08 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.186607400E09 +++$+++ You may want to review the discussion we had a while back on Commons Re:[[:Image:Max-Planck-und-Albert-Einstein.jpg]]. btw: I did get an e-mail back from the President of the DPG, many months later, saying that the DPG didn't own the copyright of this picture either. He did express his concerns about using this picture. If you think it may still be relevant I could try to find it and post it on [[Image talk:Max-Planck-und-Albert-Einstein.jpg]]. The folks of the Landesmuseum f\xfcr Technik und Arbeit in Mannheim never responded to my email though.<br>I took the liberty to re-upload it on en:wiki, because the rules for fair use are more liberal than the PD rules that apply in Commons.  +++$+++ You may want to review the discussion we had a while back on Commons Re:[[:Image:Max-Planck-und-Albert-Einstein.jpg]]. btw: I did get an e-mail back from the President of the DPG, many months later, saying that the DPG didn't own the copyright of this picture either. He did express his concerns about using this picture. If you think it may still be relevant I could try to find it and post it on [[Image talk:Max-Planck-und-Albert-Einstein.jpg]]. The folks of the Landesmuseum für Technik und Arbeit in Mannheim never responded to my email though.<br>I took the liberty to re-upload it on en:wiki, because the rules for fair use are more liberal than the PD rules that apply in Commons. [[User:JdH|JdH]] 14:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
471560 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471559 +++$+++ 471559 +++$+++ 2007-08-08 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.186608180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for this. Please do copy your links and information to [[Image talk:Max-Planck-und-Albert-Einstein.jpg]]. I think we are OK under fair-use, but someone else changed the tag to Public Domain. My view about unknown (not anonymous, but not known) authorship from that long ago, is that we should use under fair-use as it is not likely to be a problem.  +++$+++ :Thanks for this. Please do copy your links and information to [[Image talk:Max-Planck-und-Albert-Einstein.jpg]]. I think we are OK under fair-use, but someone else changed the tag to Public Domain. My view about unknown (not anonymous, but not known) authorship from that long ago, is that we should use under fair-use as it is not likely to be a problem. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 14:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

5737 +++$+++ ZooPro +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-29 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.293661740E09 +++$+++ My apologies, I forget that no one outside Australia knows what a Billabong is :) one of those moments I am afraid. Cheers for fixing that one up  +++$+++ My apologies, I forget that no one outside Australia knows what a Billabong is :) one of those moments I am afraid. Cheers for fixing that one up [[User:ZooPro|<font color="#004730" face="Papyrus">'''Zoo'''</font>]][[User talk:ZooPro|<font color="#FFD200" face="Papyrus">'''Pro'''</font>]] 14:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
5738 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5737 +++$+++ 5737 +++$+++ 2010-12-29 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.293662760E09 +++$+++ We are learning. Yesterday I was at the zoo with my almost 9 son, and said \"there's the serval's mate.\" He corrected me, saying that we didn't know it was a \"mate\" because we don't know if they are male and female (still true, as we didn't find anyone to ask yesterday). I got out of it by saying \"I meant in the Australian sense,\" at which point he said \"Oh yeah, that's...\" and proceeded with a much better Australian version of \"mate\" than I can manage.  +++$+++ :We are learning. Yesterday I was at the zoo with my almost 9 son, and said "there's the serval's mate." He corrected me, saying that we didn't know it was a "mate" because we don't know if they are male and female (still true, as we didn't find anyone to ask yesterday). I got out of it by saying "I meant in the Australian sense," at which point he said "Oh yeah, that's..." and proceeded with a much better Australian version of "mate" than I can manage. [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers#top|talk]]) 14:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

5739 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-31 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.293866520E09 +++$+++ Haven't said hello in a long time so I just wanted to send you and yours best wishes for the New Year. Can you believe that we waited until yesterday for it to finally look like the holiday season? Hope you are staying warm. Have fun editing in 2011 and cheers.  +++$+++ Haven't said hello in a long time so I just wanted to send you and yours best wishes for the New Year. Can you believe that we waited until yesterday for it to finally look like the holiday season? Hope you are staying warm. Have fun editing in 2011 and cheers. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 23:22, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
5740 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5739 +++$+++ 5739 +++$+++ 2010-12-31 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.293868260E09 +++$+++ Even so, we barely got the 6\" needed for the snowplow guy to show up -- first time this year. Happy new year and good editing to you as well.  +++$+++ :Even so, we barely got the 6" needed for the snowplow guy to show up -- first time this year. Happy new year and good editing to you as well. [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers#top|talk]]) 23:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

267884 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-03 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.204592340E09 +++$+++ Its good to see you back on your talk page. I hope I'll see the editing proceed after the one you did on 25th February. I was afraid that you have quit editing my article! +++$+++ Its good to see you back on your talk page. I hope I'll see the editing proceed after the one you did on 25th February. I was afraid that you have quit editing my article![[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 16:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
267885 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267884 +++$+++ 267884 +++$+++ 2008-03-03 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.204592520E09 +++$+++ Thanks! It is nice to get a note of good cheer. Right now I have practically destroyed my house looking for a particular book, which I cannot find!   +++$+++ :Thanks! It is nice to get a note of good cheer. Right now I have practically destroyed my house looking for a particular book, which I cannot find!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]]([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
267886 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267884 +++$+++ 267885 +++$+++ 2008-03-03 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.204593660E09 +++$+++ Don't worry you will find it when its best for you. But for that you gotta have faith and just search relaxedly. +++$+++ :: Don't worry you will find it when its best for you. But for that you gotta have faith and just search relaxedly.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 17:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
267887 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267884 +++$+++ 267886 +++$+++ 2008-03-03 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.204593840E09 +++$+++ It is the relaxing part that is hard. That is why it is hard to concentrate.  Thanks for your words.  +++$+++ :::It is the relaxing part that is hard. That is why it is hard to concentrate.  Thanks for your words. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]]([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

5741 +++$+++ Anna Frodesiak +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-05 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.294235640E09 +++$+++ Many thanks.  +++$+++ Many thanks. [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak|talk]]) 05:54, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
5742 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5741 +++$+++ 5741 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.296444540E09 +++$+++ One approach I've used to condense the animal lists rather than deleting them is to make them expandable. They don't dominate the article then, and anyone who wants to see them can do so.  +++$+++ :One approach I've used to condense the animal lists rather than deleting them is to make them expandable. They don't dominate the article then, and anyone who wants to see them can do so. [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers#top|talk]]) 19:29, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
5743 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5741 +++$+++ 5742 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.296444780E09 +++$+++ Just took a very quick look at your edits, and you seem to be doing just fine (Rainforest, Children's Zoo) before reading my advice ;-)  +++$+++ ::Just took a very quick look at your edits, and you seem to be doing just fine (Rainforest, Children's Zoo) before reading my advice ;-) [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers#top|talk]]) 19:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
5744 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5741 +++$+++ 5741 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.296456060E09 +++$+++ Finally, I think the History section fundamentally OK, but still sounds a bit ad-like -- lots of superlatives. So it needs a copy edit. I can help with this too if you want, though probably not until later this week.  +++$+++ :Finally, I think the History section fundamentally OK, but still sounds a bit ad-like -- lots of superlatives. So it needs a copy edit. I can help with this too if you want, though probably not until later this week. [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers#top|talk]]) 22:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

530030 +++$+++ ChildofMidnight +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-08 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.234092480E09 +++$+++ What was your verdict? Will you be bringing one this year's 4th of July BBQ's? Next year's Super Bowl parties?  Are you ready to try [[glorified rice]]?  I think you might have to be Lutheran to make it properly, so make sure to check first. You could also try the [[bacon explosion]], but it doesn't seem like a good idea...  +++$+++ What was your verdict? Will you be bringing one this year's 4th of July BBQ's? Next year's Super Bowl parties?  Are you ready to try [[glorified rice]]?  I think you might have to be Lutheran to make it properly, so make sure to check first. You could also try the [[bacon explosion]], but it doesn't seem like a good idea... [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 03:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
530031 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530030 +++$+++ 530030 +++$+++ 2009-02-08 05:16:00 +++$+++ 1.234098960E09 +++$+++ You got me snickering! The snickers salad was, of course, AWESOME! As usual. It was part of our Superbowl party. I noticed the new article at [[User:AlexNewArtBot\/WisconsinSearchResult]] (it's now archived}, and it inspired me to make the salad. I had made it many times before. My opinion on glorified rice: \"YUCK\". I never heard of bacon explosion before. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :You got me snickering! The snickers salad was, of course, AWESOME! As usual. It was part of our Superbowl party. I noticed the new article at [[User:AlexNewArtBot/WisconsinSearchResult]] (it's now archived}, and it inspired me to make the salad. I had made it many times before. My opinion on glorified rice: "YUCK". I never heard of bacon explosion before. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
530032 +++$+++ ChildofMidnight +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530030 +++$+++ 530031 +++$+++ 2009-02-08 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.234162980E09 +++$+++ Do you add anything besides cool whip, granny smith apples, and snickers bars to your Snickers salad? Have you had glorified rice? And what about [[dessert bars|bars]]? I'm hoping to have a photo of every type, so get to work. I like the ones with raspberry jam in them. Have a [[Leinenkugel|Leini's]] for me, cheers.  +++$+++ ::Do you add anything besides cool whip, granny smith apples, and snickers bars to your Snickers salad? Have you had glorified rice? And what about [[dessert bars|bars]]? I'm hoping to have a photo of every type, so get to work. I like the ones with raspberry jam in them. Have a [[Leinenkugel|Leini's]] for me, cheers. [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 23:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
530033 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530030 +++$+++ 530032 +++$+++ 2009-02-09 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.234167840E09 +++$+++ What you call snickers salad, we call Granny Smith Apple Salad. We use cool whip, granny smith apples, and snickers. That's all, nothing else! I tried glorified rice and didn't like it very much because I dislike cold rice or cold noodles. My aunt makes her husband's family recipe from I think [[Delta County, Michigan]] in the [[Upper Peninsula of Michigan]]. [[Dessert bars|Bars]]! Yummy bars! Everyone around here in East Central Wisconsin has them year round. We have many family recipes. I had no idea that they were a Midwestern staple - I assumed that they were worldwide! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::What you call snickers salad, we call Granny Smith Apple Salad. We use cool whip, granny smith apples, and snickers. That's all, nothing else! I tried glorified rice and didn't like it very much because I dislike cold rice or cold noodles. My aunt makes her husband's family recipe from I think [[Delta County, Michigan]] in the [[Upper Peninsula of Michigan]]. [[Dessert bars|Bars]]! Yummy bars! Everyone around here in East Central Wisconsin has them year round. We have many family recipes. I had no idea that they were a Midwestern staple - I assumed that they were worldwide! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

267888 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267888 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.204705380E09 +++$+++ I saw that you have accused me of being a '''\"spa\"''' ? or a '''\"sock puppet.\"''' I am unaware of what these names refer to, thus I can not respond in my own defense. In the future I would appreciate if you brought future allegations to me personally and allow me to respond, and not resort to libel gossip, on others talk pages.  +++$+++ I saw that you have accused me of being a '''"spa"''' ? or a '''"sock puppet."''' I am unaware of what these names refer to, thus I can not respond in my own defense. In the future I would appreciate if you brought future allegations to me personally and allow me to respond, and not resort to libel gossip, on others talk pages. [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 00:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
267889 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267888 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.204705560E09 +++$+++ I was just repeating word for word what an admin told me. No big deal. I wasn't sure what it meant at first either.   +++$+++ ::I was just repeating word for word what an admin told me. No big deal. I wasn't sure what it meant at first either.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]]([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
267890 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267888 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.204765680E09 +++$+++ What does it mean? And you said you agreed with him, that I was one ... thus how could you do so, if you didn't know what it meant ?  +++$+++ :::What does it mean? And you said you agreed with him, that I was one ... thus how could you do so, if you didn't know what it meant ? [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 17:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

5746 +++$+++ Visik +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-04 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.296809640E09 +++$+++ Tags using {{tl|WPCHINA}} or <nowiki>{{WikiProject China}}<\/nowiki> are acceptable if you read the project website [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_China]]. The reason I'm using it WPCHINA is it saves time because it is shorter. <s>Have you talked to anyone in WPCHINA or you just implemented a bot that goes round doing WPCHINA tags just for the sake of it?<\/s> -- +++$+++ Tags using {{tl|WPCHINA}} or <nowiki>{{WikiProject China}}</nowiki> are acceptable if you read the project website [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_China]]. The reason I'm using it WPCHINA is it saves time because it is shorter. <s>Have you talked to anyone in WPCHINA or you just implemented a bot that goes round doing WPCHINA tags just for the sake of it?</s> --[[User:Visik|Visik]] ([[User talk:Visik|talk]]) 00:54, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
5747 +++$+++ Visik +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5746 +++$+++ 5746 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.296809880E09 +++$+++ I do notice a bot going rounds tagging. I'm happy for the bot to re-tag but quite often they do not complete the assessment as its still a human job to assess the quality of the article. If the bot is more sophisticated, I would not need to re-tag alot of the articles. -- +++$+++ :I do notice a bot going rounds tagging. I'm happy for the bot to re-tag but quite often they do not complete the assessment as its still a human job to assess the quality of the article. If the bot is more sophisticated, I would not need to re-tag alot of the articles. --[[User:Visik|Visik]] ([[User talk:Visik|talk]]) 00:58, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
5748 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5746 +++$+++ 5747 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.296847860E09 +++$+++ I did not create the bot -- only observed what it was doing (but you may  have already figured that out). I think the template project folks are doing it so that the template doesn't need to redirect (the page probably loads fractionally faster), so I've been expanding it whenever I see the short form. There is a bot going around and assessing by amount of text or something to stub or start (I guess just to have more articles at least assessed at some level), and another one that goes around and updates all entries to the highest assessment, but they don't seem to be catching anywhere near all the articles I work on, so I've been \"helping\" them along.  +++$+++ ::I did not create the bot -- only observed what it was doing (but you may  have already figured that out). I think the template project folks are doing it so that the template doesn't need to redirect (the page probably loads fractionally faster), so I've been expanding it whenever I see the short form. There is a bot going around and assessing by amount of text or something to stub or start (I guess just to have more articles at least assessed at some level), and another one that goes around and updates all entries to the highest assessment, but they don't seem to be catching anywhere near all the articles I work on, so I've been "helping" them along. [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers#top|talk]]) 11:31, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
5749 +++$+++ WhatamIdoing +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5746 +++$+++ 5746 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.297389960E09 +++$+++ Don, what is the name of the bot?   +++$+++ :Don, what is the name of the bot?  [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 18:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
5750 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5746 +++$+++ 5749 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.297400040E09 +++$+++ I haven't seen it for a while, so I don't really remember. It may have been a semi-automated edit and not a bot. A bunch of WPZOO were changed to WikiProject Zoo. After looking at what was being done, I concluded that the edit eliminated template redirect, which made sense to me, so I've been sort of following that lead.  +++$+++ ::I haven't seen it for a while, so I don't really remember. It may have been a semi-automated edit and not a bot. A bunch of WPZOO were changed to WikiProject Zoo. After looking at what was being done, I concluded that the edit eliminated template redirect, which made sense to me, so I've been sort of following that lead. [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers#top|talk]]) 20:54, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

267892 +++$+++ Kohlasz +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.204784340E09 +++$+++ Best regards from  +++$+++ Best regards from [[User:Kohlasz|Kohlasz]] ([[User talk:Kohlasz|talk]]) 22:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
267893 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267892 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.204785720E09 +++$+++ O.K. I skimmed the article on behavior. I think  it needs to be broken down (it is a mess and I can't even read it.) My problem was that every article that had the category '''Behavior''' in it, ended up under Psychology > Behavior. Psychology is a social science, and the kind of behavior studied there has nothing to do with the behavior of chemotaxis.  In Psychology it shows up as Behavior > Taxes > Is there another way of arranging it? The average reader, I think, seeing Taxes under Behavior would be thinking \"Income taxes\". Look at [[:Category:Behavior]]. (And this is after I have cleaned it up some.) The whole category is a mess. Could there not be [[:Category:Behavior (psychology)]], [[:Category:Cell taxes]] or something similar. People were sticking things in '''Behavior''' like Etiquette, plays with animals etc., eating problems.  We need to break it down into more specific categories. What do you think? Each category is supposed to have a brief, concise description of what goes into it, like [[:Category:Psychology]]. Maybe we could come up with something.  Regards,  +++$+++ ::O.K. I skimmed the article on behavior. I think  it needs to be broken down (it is a mess and I can't even read it.) My problem was that every article that had the category '''Behavior''' in it, ended up under Psychology > Behavior. Psychology is a social science, and the kind of behavior studied there has nothing to do with the behavior of chemotaxis.  In Psychology it shows up as Behavior > Taxes > Is there another way of arranging it? The average reader, I think, seeing Taxes under Behavior would be thinking "Income taxes". Look at [[:Category:Behavior]]. (And this is after I have cleaned it up some.) The whole category is a mess. Could there not be [[:Category:Behavior (psychology)]], [[:Category:Cell taxes]] or something similar. People were sticking things in '''Behavior''' like Etiquette, plays with animals etc., eating problems.  We need to break it down into more specific categories. What do you think? Each category is supposed to have a brief, concise description of what goes into it, like [[:Category:Psychology]]. Maybe we could come up with something.  Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]]([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:42, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

5751 +++$+++ Marcus334 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-05 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.296957540E09 +++$+++ Hi Don, I pleased to encounter someone with an interest similar to mine ([[Protected areas of Tamil Nadu]]) who consistently maintains focus on his special interest rather than bouncing around Wikipedia editing various subjects of interest only at the moment. This approach generally upgrades the whole category and improves the world's perception of the broad subject. Keep up the good work.- +++$+++ Hi Don, I pleased to encounter someone with an interest similar to mine ([[Protected areas of Tamil Nadu]]) who consistently maintains focus on his special interest rather than bouncing around Wikipedia editing various subjects of interest only at the moment. This approach generally upgrades the whole category and improves the world's perception of the broad subject. Keep up the good work.-[[User:Marcus334|<font color = "#006400" >Marcus334</font>]] [[User talk:Marcus334|<font color="#8B4513">(Talk)</font>]] 17:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
5752 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5751 +++$+++ 5751 +++$+++ 2011-02-05 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.296960480E09 +++$+++ In my case, Zoos (which frequently overlap with protected areas), and lately I've mostly been trying to improve stubs and keep assessments up to date. I have other specific article interests, but I generally find I prefer sticking to a subject. Sorry I seem to have stomped on your editing at one point this morning. You hadn't saved in a while and I thought you were done for now. Thanks for the good work on Arignar Anna ZP.  +++$+++ :In my case, Zoos (which frequently overlap with protected areas), and lately I've mostly been trying to improve stubs and keep assessments up to date. I have other specific article interests, but I generally find I prefer sticking to a subject. Sorry I seem to have stomped on your editing at one point this morning. You hadn't saved in a while and I thought you were done for now. Thanks for the good work on Arignar Anna ZP. [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers#top|talk]]) 18:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

611067 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-11 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.276250820E09 +++$+++ Why did you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:HipHopStan&action=historysubmit&diff=367346613&oldid=364807867 change] this tag to \"blocked indef\", when I had only blocked it for one week? Will an admin come by to block all the accounts at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations\/HipHopfan4life]]? -- ''' +++$+++ Why did you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:HipHopStan&action=historysubmit&diff=367346613&oldid=364807867 change] this tag to "blocked indef", when I had only blocked it for one week? Will an admin come by to block all the accounts at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HipHopfan4life]]? -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 03:07, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
611068 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611067 +++$+++ 611067 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.276251180E09 +++$+++ Minor oversight, I'll get right to fixing it.  +++$+++ :Minor oversight, I'll get right to fixing it. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 03:13, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
611069 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611067 +++$+++ 611068 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.276251360E09 +++$+++ I think the last account named on the case page could use some looking into with technical CU investigation. The others are all duck, but that one with the evidence, could use CU. Thoughts? -- ''' +++$+++ ::I think the last account named on the case page could use some looking into with technical CU investigation. The others are all duck, but that one with the evidence, could use CU. Thoughts? -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 03:16, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
611070 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611067 +++$+++ 611069 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.276251960E09 +++$+++ I guess it could be checked but they look similar. Since no checkuser was run, they could be related and they could also be separate. It's your call here since you know more about them. I'm off to get some sleep so I'll undo it and see what others think.  +++$+++ :::I guess it could be checked but they look similar. Since no checkuser was run, they could be related and they could also be separate. It's your call here since you know more about them. I'm off to get some sleep so I'll undo it and see what others think. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 03:26, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
611071 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611067 +++$+++ 611070 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.276252080E09 +++$+++ Okay, thank you. The other three could all be blocked per DUCK. :) -- ''' +++$+++ ::::Okay, thank you. The other three could all be blocked per DUCK. :) -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 03:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

5754 +++$+++ Snowmanradio +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-23 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.306160940E09 +++$+++ A tag has been placed on [[:Flying High Bird Sanctuary]] by [[User:OlYeller21]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A7|section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]]. If you think the article should be kept, you are welcome to contest the deletion.  +++$+++ A tag has been placed on [[:Flying High Bird Sanctuary]] by [[User:OlYeller21]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A7|section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]]. If you think the article should be kept, you are welcome to contest the deletion. [[User:Snowmanradio|Snowman]] ([[User talk:Snowmanradio|talk]]) 07:29, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
5755 +++$+++ Snowmanradio +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5754 +++$+++ 5754 +++$+++ 2011-05-23 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.306163640E09 +++$+++ It looks like it has been saved for the moment; nevertheless, referenced additions to the article will be welcome.  +++$+++ :It looks like it has been saved for the moment; nevertheless, referenced additions to the article will be welcome. [[User:Snowmanradio|Snowman]] ([[User talk:Snowmanradio|talk]]) 08:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

263103 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263103 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-03 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.249341360E09 +++$+++ Hello Colin.  I noticed you've referred out to archive.org in one of your recent replacements.  Just thought (in case you weren't aware), the {{tl|cite web}} template has specific parameters for the use of archive URLs, which could be used instead of the <code>url<\/code> field.   +++$+++ Hello Colin.  I noticed you've referred out to archive.org in one of your recent replacements.  Just thought (in case you weren't aware), the {{tl|cite web}} template has specific parameters for the use of archive URLs, which could be used instead of the <code>url</code> field.  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 16:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
263104 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263103 +++$+++ 263103 +++$+++ 2009-08-03 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.249358460E09 +++$+++ Thanks. This is going to take me a while. Protracted. Like anything I do on WP these days.  +++$+++ :Thanks. This is going to take me a while. Protracted. Like anything I do on WP these days. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
263105 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263103 +++$+++ 263104 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.249394100E09 +++$+++ No problem, there was no way this would be fixed overnight.  I'm pleased you're happy to help.  As long as improvement continues, the FLRC will remain open so there's no chance of a premature delisting.  I did add a couple more comments at the FLRC about the arbitrary sectioning and the presence of the stats table in the list and not the main [[brain tumor]] article.  When you get a moment, I'd appreciate your thoughts on those too.  Keep up the good work, all the best.  +++$+++ ::No problem, there was no way this would be fixed overnight.  I'm pleased you're happy to help.  As long as improvement continues, the FLRC will remain open so there's no chance of a premature delisting.  I did add a couple more comments at the FLRC about the arbitrary sectioning and the presence of the stats table in the list and not the main [[brain tumor]] article.  When you get a moment, I'd appreciate your thoughts on those too.  Keep up the good work, all the best. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 06:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

267900 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267900 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-06 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.204872780E09 +++$+++ For info - I made an edit to the article yesterday (as I thought, uncontroversial if not perfectly referenced) with the intention of giving a more balanced picture.  Mattisse took a different view on my edit.  We disagreed - see debate above and elsewhere.  I backed down.  End of story. For what it's worth, I hope the article does get DYK status (he is an important figure) but I await an apology for some of the wholly unjustified and ill-tempered comments made towards me.   +++$+++ For info - I made an edit to the article yesterday (as I thought, uncontroversial if not perfectly referenced) with the intention of giving a more balanced picture.  Mattisse took a different view on my edit.  We disagreed - see debate above and elsewhere.  I backed down.  End of story. For what it's worth, I hope the article does get DYK status (he is an important figure) but I await an apology for some of the wholly unjustified and ill-tempered comments made towards me.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 22:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
267901 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267900 +++$+++ 267900 +++$+++ 2008-03-06 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.204873260E09 +++$+++ To quote from a message to me on my talk page above regarding this situation: {{quotation|As long as it's not a dispute about neutrality or something, I guess you could ask one of the regular DYK admins to protect the page for you until it's been featured. It's a bit unfair for you to miss out on a DYK just because someone can't hold off editing for a few days.}} I will ask to have the article protected so you cannot edit it temporarily if you insist on this nonsense.   +++$+++ :To quote from a message to me on my talk page above regarding this situation: {{quotation|As long as it's not a dispute about neutrality or something, I guess you could ask one of the regular DYK admins to protect the page for you until it's been featured. It's a bit unfair for you to miss out on a DYK just because someone can't hold off editing for a few days.}} I will ask to have the article protected so you cannot edit it temporarily if you insist on this nonsense.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
267902 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267900 +++$+++ 267901 +++$+++ 2008-03-06 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.204873620E09 +++$+++ Huh?  I have no intention of editing the article, but please refrain from further personal attacks.  +++$+++ ::Huh?  I have no intention of editing the article, but please refrain from further personal attacks. [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 23:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
267903 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267900 +++$+++ 267902 +++$+++ 2008-03-07 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.204961040E09 +++$+++ Oops - just edited the article. Only one letter though, so please forgive me.  +++$+++ :::Oops - just edited the article. Only one letter though, so please forgive me. [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 23:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

5759 +++$+++ Farjad0322 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5759 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.311365820E09 +++$+++ Please perform assessment of this new article. [[User:Farjad0322|<font face=\"Papyrus\">Farjad<\/font><font color=\"Purple\">'''0322''']]<\/font><font color=\"Cerise\"><sup>([[User talk:Farjad0322|talk]]&#124; +++$+++ Please perform assessment of this new article. [[User:Farjad0322|<font face="Papyrus">Farjad</font><font color="Purple">'''0322''']]</font><font color="Cerise"><sup>([[User talk:Farjad0322|talk]]&#124;[[User:Farjad0322/Guest_book|sign]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Farjad0322|contribs]])</sup></font> 13:17, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
5760 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5759 +++$+++ 5759 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.311381180E09 +++$+++ Done. I also made a few edits. This is a good solid start class article, but doesn't quite have the contents or citations to be a C. A couple additional photos wouldn't hurt either.  +++$+++ :Done. I also made a few edits. This is a good solid start class article, but doesn't quite have the contents or citations to be a C. A couple additional photos wouldn't hurt either. [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers#top|talk]]) 17:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
5761 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5759 +++$+++ 5759 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.311385200E09 +++$+++ I created a Commons category for this topic, as well as Islamabad Zoo, in the hopes that you will contribute additional photos ;-) I also added WikiProject Zoo to [[The Inevitable Flight]] and re-rated it as start. I removed the incorrect km2 conversion from the pheasantry article: 168+ [[kanal (unit)|kanal]] = 21 acres = 8.5 ha = 0.085 (not 0.85) km2.  +++$+++ :I created a Commons category for this topic, as well as Islamabad Zoo, in the hopes that you will contribute additional photos ;-) I also added WikiProject Zoo to [[The Inevitable Flight]] and re-rated it as start. I removed the incorrect km2 conversion from the pheasantry article: 168+ [[kanal (unit)|kanal]] = 21 acres = 8.5 ha = 0.085 (not 0.85) km2. [[User:Donlammers|Donlammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers#top|talk]]) 18:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

530048 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-17 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.234906560E09 +++$+++ I check my DeLorme Wisconsin Gazetteer&Atlas and there is no [[Hamerstown]] listed.I agree the article is a hoax and needs to be deleted.Thanks- +++$+++ I check my DeLorme Wisconsin Gazetteer&Atlas and there is no [[Hamerstown]] listed.I agree the article is a hoax and needs to be deleted.Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
530049 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530048 +++$+++ 530048 +++$+++ 2009-02-17 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.234910940E09 +++$+++ Please my comments in the Hamerstown article.I did some checking.Thanks- +++$+++ :Please my comments in the Hamerstown article.I did some checking.Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
530050 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530048 +++$+++ 530049 +++$+++ 2009-02-18 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.234947840E09 +++$+++ Based on both your and my assessments, I deleted it under [[WP:CSD#G3]] (pure vandalism). '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Based on both your and my assessments, I deleted it under [[WP:CSD#G3]] (pure vandalism). '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

267905 +++$+++ HelloAnnyong +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267905 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-07 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.204927860E09 +++$+++ A [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] template has been added to the article [[Excuse (nonlegal)]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion|criteria for inclusion]], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also \"[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]\" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]).  You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}<\/code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Excuse (nonlegal)|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add <code>{{tl|db-author}}<\/code> to the top of [[Excuse (nonlegal)]]. <!-- Template:PRODWarning --> &mdash;  +++$+++ A [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] template has been added to the article [[Excuse (nonlegal)]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion|criteria for inclusion]], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]).  You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Excuse (nonlegal)|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add <code>{{tl|db-author}}</code> to the top of [[Excuse (nonlegal)]]. <!-- Template:PRODWarning --> &mdash; [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User_talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 14:11, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
267906 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267905 +++$+++ 267905 +++$+++ 2008-03-07 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.204929000E09 +++$+++ O.K. I just spun the article off from [[Excuse]] which pertained to legal issues only. I do not know who wrote the original of the spin off.  +++$+++ :O.K. I just spun the article off from [[Excuse]] which pertained to legal issues only. I do not know who wrote the original of the spin off. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

5762 +++$+++ Nehrams2020 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5762 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.311580440E09 +++$+++ I assumed the listed references were sources that were being used in the article, but now, looking through the article it looks like none of those works are being cited (since I was citing the Christman book for the citations I added, I changed it to bibliography). When a list of books are provided as \"references\", I guess that is for general topic sourcing, but we're ideally supposed to be shooting for specific page number details. If they're just listed, it could also be named as \"further reading\" as no citations currently pull from them. To me, it doesn't really matter what the titling is, so if there is a preferred medthod that guidelines suggest, feel free to use that. Hopefully at some point, editors will add specific citations to the books currently listed. --Happy editing!  +++$+++ I assumed the listed references were sources that were being used in the article, but now, looking through the article it looks like none of those works are being cited (since I was citing the Christman book for the citations I added, I changed it to bibliography). When a list of books are provided as "references", I guess that is for general topic sourcing, but we're ideally supposed to be shooting for specific page number details. If they're just listed, it could also be named as "further reading" as no citations currently pull from them. To me, it doesn't really matter what the titling is, so if there is a preferred medthod that guidelines suggest, feel free to use that. Hopefully at some point, editors will add specific citations to the books currently listed. --Happy editing! [[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nehrams2020|contrib]]) 00:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
5763 +++$+++ Nehrams2020 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5762 +++$+++ 5762 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.311581220E09 +++$+++ I'm currently working on San Diego articles related to Balboa Park, so I have been going through and citing these from books I've checked out from the library. I'll probably add more citations to the zoo article in the coming weeks\/months. --Happy editing!  +++$+++ :I'm currently working on San Diego articles related to Balboa Park, so I have been going through and citing these from books I've checked out from the library. I'll probably add more citations to the zoo article in the coming weeks/months. --Happy editing! [[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nehrams2020|contrib]]) 01:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

530051 +++$+++ Erwin Springer +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530051 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-19 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.235033640E09 +++$+++ Hi I'm [[User:Erwin Springer|Erwin Springer]]. Thanks for welcoming me. I'm not on Wikipedia very often, but I know a lot about wikitext and stuff as I edit [http:\/\/www.aiowiki.com\/wiki\/Main_Page the Adventures in Odyssey wiki] and I have made a lot of [http:\/\/www.aiowiki.com\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Erwin_Springer contributions] there. What do you mean about about photos? Do I need a licence to upload pictures of certain places?  +++$+++ Hi I'm [[User:Erwin Springer|Erwin Springer]]. Thanks for welcoming me. I'm not on Wikipedia very often, but I know a lot about wikitext and stuff as I edit [http://www.aiowiki.com/wiki/Main_Page the Adventures in Odyssey wiki] and I have made a lot of [http://www.aiowiki.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Erwin_Springer contributions] there. What do you mean about about photos? Do I need a licence to upload pictures of certain places? [[User:Erwin Springer|<font color="#003399">''Erwin Springer''</font>]] <font color="#4682B4"> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:Erwin Springer|<font color="#87CEEB">'''talk'''</font>]]<nowiki>]</nowiki> </font> 00:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
530052 +++$+++ Erwin Springer +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530051 +++$+++ 530051 +++$+++ 2009-02-19 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.235110740E09 +++$+++ There is a picture of the sign [http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/_o8JOTuoU4-c\/R9fnrefTmGI\/AAAAAAAAB38\/r7_6jRSxR8Y\/s400\/NewDublin-leprechauns.jpg here], if you're intrested, I'm kind of busy, but I'll help if needed.  +++$+++ :There is a picture of the sign [http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_o8JOTuoU4-c/R9fnrefTmGI/AAAAAAAAB38/r7_6jRSxR8Y/s400/NewDublin-leprechauns.jpg here], if you're intrested, I'm kind of busy, but I'll help if needed. [[User:Erwin Springer|<font color="#003399">''Erwin Springer''</font>]] <font color="#4682B4"> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:Erwin Springer|<font color="#87CEEB">'''talk'''</font>]]<nowiki>]</nowiki> </font> 22:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
530053 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530051 +++$+++ 530051 +++$+++ 2009-02-20 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.235128440E09 +++$+++ I disagree - it existed to show that there was a sign marking the tribe in their former reservation. Whatever. I deleted it as the sole author. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I disagree - it existed to show that there was a sign marking the tribe in their former reservation. Whatever. I deleted it as the sole author. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

5764 +++$+++ MelanieN +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311800280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up. These are apparently bad-faith nominations by [[User:FireTool87]], also known as [[User:184.164.148.90]]. This user is a special purpose account dedicated to the recently deleted article [[Wilma Pang]]. The user is openly retaliating against me for my [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\/Log\/2011 July 25|Deletion review\/Log\/2011 July 25]] comments in support of deletion of that article. They did the same to another person who supported deletion. -- +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up. These are apparently bad-faith nominations by [[User:FireTool87]], also known as [[User:184.164.148.90]]. This user is a special purpose account dedicated to the recently deleted article [[Wilma Pang]]. The user is openly retaliating against me for my [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 July 25|Deletion review/Log/2011 July 25]] comments in support of deletion of that article. They did the same to another person who supported deletion. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 13:58, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
5765 +++$+++ MelanieN +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ 5764 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311836160E09 +++$+++ All fixed! Another editor reported the bad-faith nominations to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#Disruptive AFD nominations by SPA|ANI]] and the articles were all speedy-kept. It's good to know that somebody's got my back! Thanks again. -- +++$+++ ::All fixed! Another editor reported the bad-faith nominations to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive AFD nominations by SPA|ANI]] and the articles were all speedy-kept. It's good to know that somebody's got my back! Thanks again. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 23:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

88342 +++$+++ RedWolf +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88342 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-09-06 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.094470320E09 +++$+++ Hi. I noticed that you have a duplicate <nowiki><small><\/nowiki> in your signature. I noticed it when you posted to my talk page.  +++$+++ Hi. I noticed that you have a duplicate <nowiki><small></nowiki> in your signature. I noticed it when you posted to my talk page. [[User:RedWolf|RedWolf]] 04:32, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
88343 +++$+++ TheParanoidOne +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88342 +++$+++ 88342 +++$+++ 2005-06-24 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.119668760E09 +++$+++ <s>I just noticed this too. Is it intentional?<\/s> Never mind. I read the answer in RedWolf's talk pages. -- +++$+++ :<s>I just noticed this too. Is it intentional?</s> Never mind. I read the answer in RedWolf's talk pages. --[[User:TheParanoidOne|TheParanoidOne]] 20:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

5767 +++$+++ AzureCitizen +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5767 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-09 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.286685840E09 +++$+++ Don't know if you noticed, but '''WGFinley''' offered to mediate our case and so far, 7 out of 12 editors have [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation\/Restoring_Honor_rally|signified agreement here]].  If you have any reservations about him, I understand - I believe the decision needs to be unanimous - but if you're willing, assigning a mediator this way will considerably faster as '''AGK''' indicated [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:AGK&action=historysubmit&diff=389770602&oldid=389770407 here] it may take two to three weeks otherwise. Thanks for checking it out.  +++$+++ Don't know if you noticed, but '''WGFinley''' offered to mediate our case and so far, 7 out of 12 editors have [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/Restoring_Honor_rally|signified agreement here]].  If you have any reservations about him, I understand - I believe the decision needs to be unanimous - but if you're willing, assigning a mediator this way will considerably faster as '''AGK''' indicated [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AGK&action=historysubmit&diff=389770602&oldid=389770407 here] it may take two to three weeks otherwise. Thanks for checking it out. [[User:AzureCitizen|AzureCitizen]] ([[User talk:AzureCitizen|talk]]) 21:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
5768 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5767 +++$+++ 5767 +++$+++ 2010-10-09 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.286686260E09 +++$+++ I don't have a problem with WGFinley, he seems to be a reasonable choice.   +++$+++ :I don't have a problem with WGFinley, he seems to be a reasonable choice.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 21:51, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
5769 +++$+++ AzureCitizen +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5767 +++$+++ 5768 +++$+++ 2010-10-09 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.286686440E09 +++$+++ Cool.  Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Cool.  Thanks! [[User:AzureCitizen|AzureCitizen]] ([[User talk:AzureCitizen|talk]]) 21:54, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

530056 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-23 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.235380680E09 +++$+++ DYK is due for an update. Can you do it? Should be from [[T:DYK\/Q3|queue 3]].  +++$+++ DYK is due for an update. Can you do it? Should be from [[T:DYK/Q3|queue 3]]. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 01:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
530057 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530056 +++$+++ 530056 +++$+++ 2009-02-23 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.235380800E09 +++$+++ I was just looking at it! Thanks for the bump. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I was just looking at it! Thanks for the bump. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:20, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
530058 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530056 +++$+++ 530057 +++$+++ 2009-02-23 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.235380860E09 +++$+++ Sure. I can do credits if you want.  +++$+++ ::Sure. I can do credits if you want. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 01:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
530059 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530056 +++$+++ 530058 +++$+++ 2009-02-23 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.235380920E09 +++$+++ Sure, you can do the credits. I'll take care of the admin part and dealing with the recent changes. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Sure, you can do the credits. I'll take care of the admin part and dealing with the recent changes. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
530060 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530056 +++$+++ 530059 +++$+++ 2009-02-23 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.235381940E09 +++$+++ Excellent, thank you! Can you also delete the [[:File:Korean_royal_costume-Dangui_and_Seuranchima-01.jpg|previous picture]] from en and move hooks from the [[T:DYK\/N|next update queue]] to [[T:DYK\/Q1|queue 1]]?  +++$+++ ::::Excellent, thank you! Can you also delete the [[:File:Korean_royal_costume-Dangui_and_Seuranchima-01.jpg|previous picture]] from en and move hooks from the [[T:DYK/N|next update queue]] to [[T:DYK/Q1|queue 1]]? [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 01:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

267914 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.204786560E09 +++$+++ Please calm down. I do not \"vandalise\".  Ever.   +++$+++ Please calm down. I do not "vandalise".  Ever.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 22:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
267915 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267914 +++$+++ 267914 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.204787040E09 +++$+++ The only time that is ever happened to me before, (someone making over an article I started when it was one day old) was when vandals and sockpuppets were after me. I do not find well-meaning editors ever acting with such arrogance and lack of consense. You made so many errors that the article would never get through DYK. Besides, the purpose of DYK is to encourage a single editor to submit a new article. You are ruining the article. If you want to ruin it with bad sources and incorrect information, then can you please wait a few days until after the DKY? Or are you driven to ruin it now? I do not understand your rudness and dictatorial behavior.   +++$+++ :The only time that is ever happened to me before, (someone making over an article I started when it was one day old) was when vandals and sockpuppets were after me. I do not find well-meaning editors ever acting with such arrogance and lack of consense. You made so many errors that the article would never get through DYK. Besides, the purpose of DYK is to encourage a single editor to submit a new article. You are ruining the article. If you want to ruin it with bad sources and incorrect information, then can you please wait a few days until after the DKY? Or are you driven to ruin it now? I do not understand your rudness and dictatorial behavior.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]]([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
267916 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267914 +++$+++ 267915 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.204787640E09 +++$+++ You are obviously very upset, which was not my intention at all.  You state that ''\"This is the second time you have messed up an article I just started and submitted to DYK.\"'' - what?, when? - sorry, but I have no idea what you mean.  You state that ''\"This is a first warning for totally taking over another editor's contribution and without consensus did it the way you want.\"'' Quite the reverse, I am eager to find consensus, but you aggressively reverted what to my mind were wholly uncontentious changes which gave a better balance to what should be a biographical article. I have no appetite for continuing this discussion today and will take a day or two off - we'll see where we are when I return.  I am not a vandal, I am not used to being called \"rude\", I do not \"take over\" articles, and I am motivated solely by the need to improve them when necessary.   +++$+++ ::You are obviously very upset, which was not my intention at all.  You state that ''"This is the second time you have messed up an article I just started and submitted to DYK."'' - what?, when? - sorry, but I have no idea what you mean.  You state that ''"This is a first warning for totally taking over another editor's contribution and without consensus did it the way you want."'' Quite the reverse, I am eager to find consensus, but you aggressively reverted what to my mind were wholly uncontentious changes which gave a better balance to what should be a biographical article. I have no appetite for continuing this discussion today and will take a day or two off - we'll see where we are when I return.  I am not a vandal, I am not used to being called "rude", I do not "take over" articles, and I am motivated solely by the need to improve them when necessary.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 23:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
267917 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267914 +++$+++ 267916 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.204788540E09 +++$+++ I have no problem with retitling the article as you have done, nor with the emphasis of the text being placed on his work as a producer, but the fact remains that his other work as an organiser of, ''and singer with'', other groups including The Larks - who were important in their own way in the secular music field - should be ''mentioned''.  Personally, I really don't care ''that'' much if you want to mention it later in the article rather than as a lead item, but to my mind a chronological approach is almost always preferable in a biographical article.   +++$+++ :::I have no problem with retitling the article as you have done, nor with the emphasis of the text being placed on his work as a producer, but the fact remains that his other work as an organiser of, ''and singer with'', other groups including The Larks - who were important in their own way in the secular music field - should be ''mentioned''.  Personally, I really don't care ''that'' much if you want to mention it later in the article rather than as a lead item, but to my mind a chronological approach is almost always preferable in a biographical article.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 23:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
267918 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267914 +++$+++ 267917 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.204788960E09 +++$+++ The article was one day old. I wrote it for DYK - that exists so an editor like me can write a little article and get a DYK, before people like you mess it up.  Why you can't wait to screw the article up until after the DYK, I do not understand. I have over 50 DYK's so I know what works for a DKY and a messed up format with a bad hook and references that do not follow [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] is not the way to go. As I said, screw the article up as much as you want after. I don't care if it is a bad article or not later.  +++$+++ ::::The article was one day old. I wrote it for DYK - that exists so an editor like me can write a little article and get a DYK, before people like you mess it up.  Why you can't wait to screw the article up until after the DYK, I do not understand. I have over 50 DYK's so I know what works for a DKY and a messed up format with a bad hook and references that do not follow [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] is not the way to go. As I said, screw the article up as much as you want after. I don't care if it is a bad article or not later. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]]([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
267919 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267914 +++$+++ 267918 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.204789260E09 +++$+++ I find the obsession with \"getting DYKs\" utterly bizarre.  '''''\"Screw the article up as much as you want after. I don't care if it is a bad article or not later.\"''''' - if that is the view of an experienced editor, then heaven help us all.   +++$+++ :::::I find the obsession with "getting DYKs" utterly bizarre.  '''''"Screw the article up as much as you want after. I don't care if it is a bad article or not later."''''' - if that is the view of an experienced editor, then heaven help us all.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 23:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
267920 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267914 +++$+++ 267919 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.204789560E09 +++$+++ Well, it is editors like you that made the DYK a pleasure as a well written article can be left alone there. What is your problem that you can not wait a few days until the DYK is over before you make a mess of it? In fact, maybe you did ruin the DYK if the DYK editors evaluated it while it was in the mess you put it in. Organization, emphasis, etc. is not for you to decide unilaterally on a one-day-old article that you have not edited at all, not consulted on at all,  but merely grabbed it for yourself as if you were the boss. What is the matter with you?   +++$+++ ::::::Well, it is editors like you that made the DYK a pleasure as a well written article can be left alone there. What is your problem that you can not wait a few days until the DYK is over before you make a mess of it? In fact, maybe you did ruin the DYK if the DYK editors evaluated it while it was in the mess you put it in. Organization, emphasis, etc. is not for you to decide unilaterally on a one-day-old article that you have not edited at all, not consulted on at all,  but merely grabbed it for yourself as if you were the boss. What is the matter with you?  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]]([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

5771 +++$+++ Amadscientist +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5771 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-16 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.287241560E09 +++$+++ My edits were in good faith. No POV was added. Tightened lede and copy edited over weighted section as discussed on talk page. Consensus was followed. As a major contributer to the article and member of project Biography of a Living Person don't understand your summary. I only ask to assume good faith.-- +++$+++ My edits were in good faith. No POV was added. Tightened lede and copy edited over weighted section as discussed on talk page. Consensus was followed. As a major contributer to the article and member of project Biography of a Living Person don't understand your summary. I only ask to assume good faith.--[[User:Amadscientist|Amadscientist]] ([[User talk:Amadscientist|talk]]) 08:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
5772 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5771 +++$+++ 5771 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.287265080E09 +++$+++ I was mostly focused on the undocumented alien maid.  This section has been the focus of poltical posturing, and when I saw you add some words like \"however\" and \"claims\" to link sections together it reads like NPOV.  I should have been more specific.   +++$+++ :I was mostly focused on the undocumented alien maid.  This section has been the focus of poltical posturing, and when I saw you add some words like "however" and "claims" to link sections together it reads like NPOV.  I should have been more specific.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 14:38, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

5773 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-16 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.287272220E09 +++$+++ {{hat|Vindictive editor's comments closed}}Could you have a look here? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&target=The+Artist+AKA+Mr+Anonymous]. If you could also make a correction on the SPI page, that would be appreciated.  +++$+++ {{hat|Vindictive editor's comments closed}}Could you have a look here? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&target=The+Artist+AKA+Mr+Anonymous]. If you could also make a correction on the SPI page, that would be appreciated. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 16:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
5774 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5773 +++$+++ 5773 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.287276360E09 +++$+++ If you were to correct the noted error and not leave knowingly false information in place as strikethrough text that would be appreciated.  +++$+++ : If you were to correct the noted error and not leave knowingly false information in place as strikethrough text that would be appreciated. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 17:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
5775 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5773 +++$+++ 5774 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.287277800E09 +++$+++ Your correction is noticeably less prominent than you error. The issue is not me, but BS24, and if you could focus on the substantial and relevant evidence for BS24's alleged and well-noted disruptiveness, that might be of help to his case. I would suggest that posts about me will have no bearing on how an Admin will conduct the investigation. As to my sockpuppet investigation, which was concluded in my favor, you can find out more about it here.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/The_Artist_AKA_Mr_Anonymous\/Archive]  +++$+++ :: Your correction is noticeably less prominent than you error. The issue is not me, but BS24, and if you could focus on the substantial and relevant evidence for BS24's alleged and well-noted disruptiveness, that might be of help to his case. I would suggest that posts about me will have no bearing on how an Admin will conduct the investigation. As to my sockpuppet investigation, which was concluded in my favor, you can find out more about it here.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/The_Artist_AKA_Mr_Anonymous/Archive] [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 18:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
5776 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5773 +++$+++ 5775 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.287278820E09 +++$+++ I would also would like you to correct your false assertion that I am opposed to the mediation process.  +++$+++ ::: I would also would like you to correct your false assertion that I am opposed to the mediation process. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 18:27, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
5777 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5773 +++$+++ 5776 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.287281340E09 +++$+++ If you had not made statements that would make people think that you and IP82 were the same person and had just used your account instead of IP67 and IP69 then you would never had a checkuser against you.  As for the mediation process, I cannot correct which is not false.  You have been the most vocal against the mediation process.   +++$+++ :::: If you had not made statements that would make people think that you and IP82 were the same person and had just used your account instead of IP67 and IP69 then you would never had a checkuser against you.  As for the mediation process, I cannot correct which is not false.  You have been the most vocal against the mediation process.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 19:09, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
5778 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5773 +++$+++ 5777 +++$+++ 2010-10-17 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.287299640E09 +++$+++ I'm unaware statements of mine to that effect, and have always wondered what is being referred to. (BTW, no one could figure out what was meant by IP82) It's impossible to declare someone who agrees to mediation, and has not since agreement voiced any opposition, as an active opponent of mediation. It could do the right thing and correct your posts maintaining that error.  +++$+++ ::::: I'm unaware statements of mine to that effect, and have always wondered what is being referred to. (BTW, no one could figure out what was meant by IP82) It's impossible to declare someone who agrees to mediation, and has not since agreement voiced any opposition, as an active opponent of mediation. It could do the right thing and correct your posts maintaining that error. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 00:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

530062 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-01 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.235910600E09 +++$+++ Are you up for another update in a few minutes?  +++$+++ Are you up for another update in a few minutes? [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 04:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
530063 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530062 +++$+++ 530062 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.235910960E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I know what you mean. I did some vandal stuff early on, and DYK definitely has a different feel. Right now especially...we have less than 150 unverified hooks on the nominations page...could reach 100 soon. Definitely an improvement, with everyone (Awadewit, Mattisse especially) pitching in. The queues are all full too...it's very nice. Well, if you ignore the WT side.  +++$+++ :Yeah, I know what you mean. I did some vandal stuff early on, and DYK definitely has a different feel. Right now especially...we have less than 150 unverified hooks on the nominations page...could reach 100 soon. Definitely an improvement, with everyone (Awadewit, Mattisse especially) pitching in. The queues are all full too...it's very nice. Well, if you ignore the WT side. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 04:36, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
530064 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530062 +++$+++ 530063 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.235910960E09 +++$+++ Oh, want me to do credits again?  +++$+++ ::Oh, want me to do credits again? [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 04:36, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
530065 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530062 +++$+++ 530064 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.235911740E09 +++$+++ Haha, yeah. It was weird the first time I went to a page to give credits and saw a previous posting of mine. That reminds me, the first part of your answer to the first question in your RfA is eerily similar to one I would give. I could copy it verbatim. Another interesting tidbit: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Shubinator&diff=prev&oldid=272630027 this] response to you a week ago was apparently my 1000th edit. I couldn't have picked a more fitting one if I'd chosen it.  +++$+++ :::Haha, yeah. It was weird the first time I went to a page to give credits and saw a previous posting of mine. That reminds me, the first part of your answer to the first question in your RfA is eerily similar to one I would give. I could copy it verbatim. Another interesting tidbit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shubinator&diff=prev&oldid=272630027 this] response to you a week ago was apparently my 1000th edit. I couldn't have picked a more fitting one if I'd chosen it. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 04:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
530066 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530062 +++$+++ 530065 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.235912880E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I dig around RfA's once in a while. It's especially interesting to look at the ones for DYK editors because I might be in that boat some day. Yours and Suntag's are two different sides of the coin.  +++$+++ ::::Yeah, I dig around RfA's once in a while. It's especially interesting to look at the ones for DYK editors because I might be in that boat some day. Yours and Suntag's are two different sides of the coin. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 05:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
530067 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530062 +++$+++ 530066 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.235914260E09 +++$+++ It seems like RfA's are either unanimous (or close to it), or it's a borderline case or below. Doesn't seem to be a middle ground, like 85% approval. There always does seem to be some heckler-type in the oppose section. I've already had my share of RfA drama too...my 6th edit. I didn't get badgered, but I'm sure some were thinking it, and that's the first impression people got of me.  +++$+++ :::::It seems like RfA's are either unanimous (or close to it), or it's a borderline case or below. Doesn't seem to be a middle ground, like 85% approval. There always does seem to be some heckler-type in the oppose section. I've already had my share of RfA drama too...my 6th edit. I didn't get badgered, but I'm sure some were thinking it, and that's the first impression people got of me. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 05:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

568941 +++$+++ Jrmccall +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568941 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-13 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.160803260E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'm right in the middle of transferring the material on \"Hamlet the Character\" from the \"Hamlet\" page to this new [[Prince Hamlet]] page. The reason for this is consistency: characters in Shakespeare's plays (some quite minor!) typically have their own page. Shouldn't Prince Hamlet, the most well-known of them? \u2014  +++$+++ Hi. I'm right in the middle of transferring the material on "Hamlet the Character" from the "Hamlet" page to this new [[Prince Hamlet]] page. The reason for this is consistency: characters in Shakespeare's plays (some quite minor!) typically have their own page. Shouldn't Prince Hamlet, the most well-known of them? — [[User:Jrmccall|Jrmccall]] 22:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
568942 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568941 +++$+++ 568941 +++$+++ 2006-10-13 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.160803620E09 +++$+++ Is that a Wikiproject or a personal project; is there a Talk page discussion about giving characters their own articles?  You can use the <nowiki>{{ inuse }}<\/nowiki> tag to show that it is a work-in-progress and avoid accidental redirects\/deletions, etc. Regards,  +++$+++ :Is that a Wikiproject or a personal project; is there a Talk page discussion about giving characters their own articles?  You can use the <nowiki>{{ inuse }}</nowiki> tag to show that it is a work-in-progress and avoid accidental redirects/deletions, etc. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

267922 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267922 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-08 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.205039820E09 +++$+++ Moving on (as I hope we now can) .... Two points : (1) does it need to say <del>(producer)<\/del> (promoter) after his name in the title - I thought that was only advisable where there is more than one individual with the same name, which doesn't apply here; and (2) do you have verification of the spelling of his name? I have seen various alternatives in different sources, none of which seem indisputable. Until it's resolved I've set up redirects from alternative spellings anyway.   +++$+++ Moving on (as I hope we now can) .... Two points : (1) does it need to say <del>(producer)</del> (promoter) after his name in the title - I thought that was only advisable where there is more than one individual with the same name, which doesn't apply here; and (2) do you have verification of the spelling of his name? I have seen various alternatives in different sources, none of which seem indisputable. Until it's resolved I've set up redirects from alternative spellings anyway.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 21:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
267923 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267922 +++$+++ 267922 +++$+++ 2008-03-08 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.205041800E09 +++$+++ I received the DYK, probably earlier than normally due to the attention you brought it&mdash;the DYK people felt sorry for me! As far as the spelling of Ruth's name goes, I just used the name that is used in the most reliable, credible sources I have, but certainly redirects are fine. I identified him as \"promoter\" because that was his primary  career, (along with being a deejay and an [[MC]]) and his contribution to the history of American music  was his promotion of black gospel into the mainstream. I had to comment out a footnote you put in. I could not figure out why it wasn't working as it works under External links. Anyway, that type of reference in the body of the article does not met the requirements of [[WP:V|verifiable sources]] etc. but is O.K. under External links.   +++$+++ :I received the DYK, probably earlier than normally due to the attention you brought it&mdash;the DYK people felt sorry for me! As far as the spelling of Ruth's name goes, I just used the name that is used in the most reliable, credible sources I have, but certainly redirects are fine. I identified him as "promoter" because that was his primary  career, (along with being a deejay and an [[MC]]) and his contribution to the history of American music  was his promotion of black gospel into the mainstream. I had to comment out a footnote you put in. I could not figure out why it wasn't working as it works under External links. Anyway, that type of reference in the body of the article does not met the requirements of [[WP:V|verifiable sources]] etc. but is O.K. under External links.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

5779 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5779 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-17 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.287308340E09 +++$+++ I suggest you go back and read some of your own comments [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Restoring_Honor_rally#Request_for_mediation here].  If that is not opposition then please tell me where that line is.   +++$+++ I suggest you go back and read some of your own comments [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Restoring_Honor_rally#Request_for_mediation here].  If that is not opposition then please tell me where that line is.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 02:39, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
5780 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5779 +++$+++ 5779 +++$+++ 2010-10-17 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.287312660E09 +++$+++ The line is chronological, and all my above comments have addressed that aspect. If you would take back your statements that make it seem that I'm presently opposed, I would be grateful.  +++$+++ : The line is chronological, and all my above comments have addressed that aspect. If you would take back your statements that make it seem that I'm presently opposed, I would be grateful. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 03:51, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
5781 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5779 +++$+++ 5780 +++$+++ 2010-10-18 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.287400860E09 +++$+++ Hear that? Crickets.  +++$+++ :: Hear that? Crickets. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 04:21, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
5782 +++$+++ BS24 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5779 +++$+++ 5781 +++$+++ 2010-10-23 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.287822780E09 +++$+++ Your hostile and confrontational tone in any and all disputes is very unbecoming and doesn't help your vendetta against me and others.  +++$+++ :::Your hostile and confrontational tone in any and all disputes is very unbecoming and doesn't help your vendetta against me and others. [[User:BS24|BS24]] ([[User talk:BS24|talk]]) 01:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

530068 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530068 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-03 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.236086940E09 +++$+++ Another update needed, from [[T:DYK\/Q4|queue 4]]. I'll take credits :)  +++$+++ Another update needed, from [[T:DYK/Q4|queue 4]]. I'll take credits :) [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 05:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
530069 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530068 +++$+++ 530068 +++$+++ 2009-03-03 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.236087540E09 +++$+++ Credits done. I like your edit summary for the archive :P  +++$+++ :Credits done. I like your edit summary for the archive :P [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 05:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
530070 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530068 +++$+++ 530069 +++$+++ 2009-03-03 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.236088020E09 +++$+++ Haha, my backup was Ruhrfisch. I've got this down to an art now. There are actually a decent amount of \"Willing to help\" DYK admins editing right now, but you're my top choice. Just last update I had to fetch Kanonkas though. You should see PeterSymond's edits in the DYK archives...cracked me up. Yeah, I like programming. The updating bot is up to Ameliorate! for now, but I'll gladly help. In a week I'll probably start on a tagging bot that tags every article that's ever appeared in DYK.  +++$+++ ::Haha, my backup was Ruhrfisch. I've got this down to an art now. There are actually a decent amount of "Willing to help" DYK admins editing right now, but you're my top choice. Just last update I had to fetch Kanonkas though. You should see PeterSymond's edits in the DYK archives...cracked me up. Yeah, I like programming. The updating bot is up to Ameliorate! for now, but I'll gladly help. In a week I'll probably start on a tagging bot that tags every article that's ever appeared in DYK. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 05:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

267925 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-11 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.205225280E09 +++$+++ You have the audacity to warn me of \"insults\". You labeled (by agreeing) me a \"Sock Puppet\" and ''\"Spa\"'' basically spreading the libel that I was a phony user of someone else. Now when I bring up the REALITY, that you told me you were \"finished\" with the article, you label that a personal attack? This would be funny, if it wasn't so disingenuous.  +++$+++ You have the audacity to warn me of "insults". You labeled (by agreeing) me a "Sock Puppet" and ''"Spa"'' basically spreading the libel that I was a phony user of someone else. Now when I bring up the REALITY, that you told me you were "finished" with the article, you label that a personal attack? This would be funny, if it wasn't so disingenuous. [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 01:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
267926 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267925 +++$+++ 267925 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.205225520E09 +++$+++ You are not welcome to comment on my talk page again. If you have anything to say about the article, say it on the article talk page.   +++$+++ :You are not welcome to comment on my talk page again. If you have anything to say about the article, say it on the article talk page.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
267927 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267925 +++$+++ 267926 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.205225880E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Then in the same spirit, Please Stop Vandalizing my Talk Page. Do not post on my talk page again, as you have made the same request of me.  +++$+++ ::[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Then in the same spirit, Please Stop Vandalizing my Talk Page. Do not post on my talk page again, as you have made the same request of me. [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 01:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
267928 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267925 +++$+++ 267927 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.205226360E09 +++$+++ Templating your talk page because you are making personal attacks is not vandalizm. I am asking you again not to post on my talk page.   +++$+++ :::Templating your talk page because you are making personal attacks is not vandalizm. I am asking you again not to post on my talk page.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
267929 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267925 +++$+++ 267928 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.205226660E09 +++$+++ '''I have not made any personal attacks against you!''' You believe that the rules only apply to others and not yourself, and also wish to have the last word on your talk page and expect me '''not''' to answer your accusations. '''Name me the specific insults I have lobbed against you, or refrain from the false accusation.''' I can document 2 insults you made against me, and all I have done is pose the question of whether I should believe your own words, when you declare to everyone you are ''\"finished\"'' with a particular article or not? That is not an INSULT. And if you would like me to stop commenting on your page, then stop casting accusations against me on it.  +++$+++ ::::'''I have not made any personal attacks against you!''' You believe that the rules only apply to others and not yourself, and also wish to have the last word on your talk page and expect me '''not''' to answer your accusations. '''Name me the specific insults I have lobbed against you, or refrain from the false accusation.''' I can document 2 insults you made against me, and all I have done is pose the question of whether I should believe your own words, when you declare to everyone you are ''"finished"'' with a particular article or not? That is not an INSULT. And if you would like me to stop commenting on your page, then stop casting accusations against me on it. [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 02:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

5783 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5783 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-29 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.288398300E09 +++$+++ BS24 used so many socks that it was near impossible to detect which tags he didn't add. An editor restored those for which there was consensus and non-disruptive. And in case you're concerned that you've unintentionally may have suggested that I was being disruptive, this may help you. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Alexandria_Aces_(Cal_Ripken_Collegiate_Baseball)#BS24.2C_et_al]. As for Wikistalking? Hmmm.  +++$+++ BS24 used so many socks that it was near impossible to detect which tags he didn't add. An editor restored those for which there was consensus and non-disruptive. And in case you're concerned that you've unintentionally may have suggested that I was being disruptive, this may help you. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alexandria_Aces_(Cal_Ripken_Collegiate_Baseball)#BS24.2C_et_al]. As for Wikistalking? Hmmm. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 17:25, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
5784 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5783 +++$+++ 5783 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.288422600E09 +++$+++ I never said you were disruptive, even though you are disruptive.  I said you were vindictive.  Probably the most vindictive editor I have ever seen on WP.  Normally I would simply remove your trollish comments, but I have decided that others should also be able to see a history of your vindictiveness.  Happy Halloween.   +++$+++ :I never said you were disruptive, even though you are disruptive.  I said you were vindictive.  Probably the most vindictive editor I have ever seen on WP.  Normally I would simply remove your trollish comments, but I have decided that others should also be able to see a history of your vindictiveness.  Happy Halloween.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 00:10, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
5785 +++$+++ 82.135.29.209 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5783 +++$+++ 5784 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.288427940E09 +++$+++ [[WP:NPA]]. Watch the fishes of your aquarium and relax! [[Special:Contributions\/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ( +++$+++ ::[[WP:NPA]]. Watch the fishes of your aquarium and relax! [[Special:Contributions/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ([[User talk:82.135.29.209|talk]]) 01:39, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
5786 +++$+++ Akerans +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5783 +++$+++ 5783 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.288477380E09 +++$+++ Considering that 47 of your last 50 edits (as I write this) are centered around an editor, rather than content, you do appear to be bordering on, if not already, [[Wikipedia:Harassment]] and\/or [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]]. Administration has responded to the SPI, and since you have nothing new to add regarding recent activity of sockpuppetry, this is the point where editors [[WP:STICK|drop the stick and walk away]]. \/\/  +++$+++ :Considering that 47 of your last 50 edits (as I write this) are centered around an editor, rather than content, you do appear to be bordering on, if not already, [[Wikipedia:Harassment]] and/or [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]]. Administration has responded to the SPI, and since you have nothing new to add regarding recent activity of sockpuppetry, this is the point where editors [[WP:STICK|drop the stick and walk away]]. // [[User:Akerans|Akerans]] ([[User talk:Akerans|talk]]) 15:23, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
5787 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5783 +++$+++ 5786 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.288501260E09 +++$+++ Nah. Good try though. Admins who seem to have fashioned a double secret stature of limitations need help, especially when the SPI subject has trucked in so many blatant empirical falsehoods that they can not go unadressed. Now, if you would like to substantially counter the charges, and without resorting any of the  multi-faceted ad hominem attacks adopted by BS24 and Arzel, hop to it. BS24 and Arzel seem to be without that capacity.  +++$+++ :: Nah. Good try though. Admins who seem to have fashioned a double secret stature of limitations need help, especially when the SPI subject has trucked in so many blatant empirical falsehoods that they can not go unadressed. Now, if you would like to substantially counter the charges, and without resorting any of the  multi-faceted ad hominem attacks adopted by BS24 and Arzel, hop to it. BS24 and Arzel seem to be without that capacity. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 22:01, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
5788 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5783 +++$+++ 5787 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.288501560E09 +++$+++ I really like how you manage multiple personal attacks on both BS24 and myself in so few words.   +++$+++ :::I really like how you manage multiple personal attacks on both BS24 and myself in so few words.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 22:06, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
5789 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5783 +++$+++ 5788 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.288502220E09 +++$+++ Somehow I don't think that was flattery. Prove my charges wrong, and I'll gift wrap a mea culpa.  +++$+++ :::: Somehow I don't think that was flattery. Prove my charges wrong, and I'll gift wrap a mea culpa. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 22:17, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
5790 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5783 +++$+++ 5789 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.288502880E09 +++$+++ It is not possible to prove the negative.   +++$+++ ::::: It is not possible to prove the negative.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 22:28, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
5791 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5783 +++$+++ 5790 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.288503900E09 +++$+++ You just lost me. All the documentation positively proves that BS24 (who may have had enough socks to go into the double digits) actively evaded scrutiny, and falsely claimed to have been on indefinite ban for one act of vandalism. So what would be the negatives you can't prove?  +++$+++ :::::: You just lost me. All the documentation positively proves that BS24 (who may have had enough socks to go into the double digits) actively evaded scrutiny, and falsely claimed to have been on indefinite ban for one act of vandalism. So what would be the negatives you can't prove? [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 22:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
5792 +++$+++ Akerans +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5783 +++$+++ 5791 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.288515960E09 +++$+++ The recent sockpuppets that you didn't list. Can't disprove those. That is not to say I would try to disprove them, however.  +++$+++ :::::::The recent sockpuppets that you didn't list. Can't disprove those. That is not to say I would try to disprove them, however. [[User:Akerans|Akerans]] ([[User talk:Akerans|talk]]) 02:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

267930 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-11 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.205244720E09 +++$+++ I think everyone has gotten the message by now that perhaps by trying to have the last word over and over, then we'll be stuck. ''' +++$+++ I think everyone has gotten the message by now that perhaps by trying to have the last word over and over, then we'll be stuck. '''[[User:Blnguyen|<font color="GoldenRod">Blnguyen</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:Blnguyen#Straw_poll_for_selecting_photos_of_the_Indian_cricket_team_for_use_in_articles|<font color="#FA8605">vote in the photo straw poll</font>]]'') 07:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
267931 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267930 +++$+++ 267930 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.205266260E09 +++$+++ Hopefully you are right. I have not responded except to put personal attack warnings on his page yesterday for the first time. I have ignored the personal attacks for some weeks now and it did drive me away from editing the article. However, I want to edit the article again, and  I will template him or seek further help if he continues. I have asked him several times to only respond on the article talk page and to comment on content and not on editors. He has virtually \"owned\" the [[Che Guevara]] article since December 2007.  Thanks! I will hope for the best!  +++$+++ :Hopefully you are right. I have not responded except to put personal attack warnings on his page yesterday for the first time. I have ignored the personal attacks for some weeks now and it did drive me away from editing the article. However, I want to edit the article again, and  I will template him or seek further help if he continues. I have asked him several times to only respond on the article talk page and to comment on content and not on editors. He has virtually "owned" the [[Che Guevara]] article since December 2007.  Thanks! I will hope for the best! [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

568943 +++$+++ Stevewk +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568943 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-16 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.160983920E09 +++$+++ -re your message on my talk page, sorry, that \"Freddiex\" thing is a pure mistake, and should be deleted.  i just dont know how.   +++$+++ -re your message on my talk page, sorry, that "Freddiex" thing is a pure mistake, and should be deleted.  i just dont know how.  [[User:Stevewk|Stevewk]] 00:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
568944 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568943 +++$+++ 568943 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.160998980E09 +++$+++ Non-admins can't delete pages, so I have done it for you.  +++$+++ :Non-admins can't delete pages, so I have done it for you. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 04:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

267932 +++$+++ Michael Hardy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.205309040E09 +++$+++ Why do you say this name is \"wrong\"?  Certainly it is a widespread and standard name of the topic, ever since [[Ronald Fisher]]'s famous book introduced the subject in 1935.  +++$+++ Why do you say this name is "wrong"?  Certainly it is a widespread and standard name of the topic, ever since [[Ronald Fisher]]'s famous book introduced the subject in 1935. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 01:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
267933 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267932 +++$+++ 267932 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.205309520E09 +++$+++ It's not a big deal. All my books  and the courses I took  called it '''Experimental Design'''. I'm just in a bad mood from trying to untangle the '''Psychology''' category. I don't know of a way, right now, to get the relevant statistical and experimental design articles into psychology. It quickly gets out of hand. Sorry. It is not important what the article is called.  Regards,  +++$+++ :It's not a big deal. All my books  and the courses I took  called it '''Experimental Design'''. I'm just in a bad mood from trying to untangle the '''Psychology''' category. I don't know of a way, right now, to get the relevant statistical and experimental design articles into psychology. It quickly gets out of hand. Sorry. It is not important what the article is called.  Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

612634 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612634 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.174532700E09 +++$+++ Ach, you're right. Getting a little too free with the \"goddamnit\"s and variations of late. Just getting a bit frustrated with everything. Ah, well. I've put in a request to have my deletion checked. Maybe that'll put an end to it.  +++$+++ Ach, you're right. Getting a little too free with the "goddamnit"s and variations of late. Just getting a bit frustrated with everything. Ah, well. I've put in a request to have my deletion checked. Maybe that'll put an end to it. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 20:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
612635 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612634 +++$+++ 612634 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.174532880E09 +++$+++ Eh? I was just objecting to the loose language used by Homeopathic on your talk page, didn't notice your frustration...  +++$+++ :Eh? I was just objecting to the loose language used by Homeopathic on your talk page, didn't notice your frustration... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
612636 +++$+++ Adam Cuerden +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612634 +++$+++ 612635 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.174534500E09 +++$+++ Oh, I made a couple \"Goddammit\" edit summaries on the Vithoulkas deletion page when Lee was repeatedly attakcing me over the copyvio deletion. Never mind, then.  +++$+++ ::Oh, I made a couple "Goddammit" edit summaries on the Vithoulkas deletion page when Lee was repeatedly attakcing me over the copyvio deletion. Never mind, then. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>[[User_talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]</sup> 20:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

267935 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.205353800E09 +++$+++ I have no doubt about your will to help me. Also its very clear that you are too busy. But I am worried about the complete primary reconstruction of my article by you that you assured me of. Will you please tell me your future plan about its further proceeding? You have to tackle a lot of projects for many. But I have to tackle this single project for the rest of the world. That keeps me sweating all the time with different apprehensions.  +++$+++ I have no doubt about your will to help me. Also its very clear that you are too busy. But I am worried about the complete primary reconstruction of my article by you that you assured me of. Will you please tell me your future plan about its further proceeding? You have to tackle a lot of projects for many. But I have to tackle this single project for the rest of the world. That keeps me sweating all the time with different apprehensions. [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 13:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
267936 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267935 +++$+++ 267935 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.205353920E09 +++$+++ Yes I will within the week.  +++$+++ :Yes I will within the week. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
267937 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267935 +++$+++ 267936 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.205354520E09 +++$+++ Thanks its assuring! +++$+++ :: Thanks its assuring![[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 13:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

530080 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530080 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-12 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.236853980E09 +++$+++ Want me to do credits?  +++$+++ Want me to do credits? [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 03:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
530081 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530080 +++$+++ 530080 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.236854040E09 +++$+++ Sure, works for me.  +++$+++ :Sure, works for me. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 03:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
530082 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530080 +++$+++ 530081 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.236854880E09 +++$+++ Done. Thanks for your help! Maybe you can help Ruhrfisch with the deleting...it's quite a pile.  +++$+++ ::Done. Thanks for your help! Maybe you can help Ruhrfisch with the deleting...it's quite a pile. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 03:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
530083 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530080 +++$+++ 530082 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.236857460E09 +++$+++ A [[:File:Klaus_Fuchs_ID_badge.png|couple]] [[:File:Queen_Anne.jpg|images]] (from OTD) got left behind. Also, [[:File:Barack_Obama_-_ITN.jpg|this image]] looks old indeed, judging by [[User:TonyTheTiger\/ITN|this user archive]]. Thank you for your help!  +++$+++ :::A [[:File:Klaus_Fuchs_ID_badge.png|couple]] [[:File:Queen_Anne.jpg|images]] (from OTD) got left behind. Also, [[:File:Barack_Obama_-_ITN.jpg|this image]] looks old indeed, judging by [[User:TonyTheTiger/ITN|this user archive]]. Thank you for your help! [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 04:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
530084 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530080 +++$+++ 530083 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.236858180E09 +++$+++ The last one is also temporarily uploaded from Commons, even if it isn't tagged as such; the Commons version is [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Barack_Obama_-_ITN.jpg here]. So pages that show the En version will still show the Commons version after deletion.  +++$+++ ::::The last one is also temporarily uploaded from Commons, even if it isn't tagged as such; the Commons version is [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Barack_Obama_-_ITN.jpg here]. So pages that show the En version will still show the Commons version after deletion. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 04:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

5794 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-30 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.288500180E09 +++$+++ {{hat|Pointless discussion done}}\"Liar\" is your word which you put in my mouth. BS24's \"mendacity\" (my word) damningly documented by me and Xenophrenic; so well that I suppose that is why there has been no substantial response, but only the assumption of the pitiful victim role. I stand by the charge.  +++$+++ {{hat|Pointless discussion done}}"Liar" is your word which you put in my mouth. BS24's "mendacity" (my word) damningly documented by me and Xenophrenic; so well that I suppose that is why there has been no substantial response, but only the assumption of the pitiful victim role. I stand by the charge. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 21:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
5795 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5794 +++$+++ 5794 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.288500960E09 +++$+++ You typed it, not me, so unless you have a different meaning for it, you have stated that BS24 has a tendency to not tell the truth.  Perhaps I should have said you basically called him a habitual liar.   +++$+++ :You typed it, not me, so unless you have a different meaning for it, you have stated that BS24 has a tendency to not tell the truth.  Perhaps I should have said you basically called him a habitual liar.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 21:56, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
5796 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5794 +++$+++ 5795 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.288501620E09 +++$+++ My mouth's full of words you keep jamming in there. Maybe you could substantially defend BS24 against the  charges. He hasn't, but you could should there be such a defense.  +++$+++ :: My mouth's full of words you keep jamming in there. Maybe you could substantially defend BS24 against the  charges. He hasn't, but you could should there be such a defense. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 22:07, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
5797 +++$+++ 82.135.29.209 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5794 +++$+++ 5796 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.288550820E09 +++$+++ Arzel, AKA has a really good point here: Both in the [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/NYyankees51|SPI]] and in the [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#The_Artist_AKA_Mr_Anonymous|WQA]] you are not arguing the matter, but [[Ad_hominem#Ad_hominem_abuse|\"but insulting or belittling one's opponent in order to invalidate his or her argument [...]. This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.\"]] [[Special:Contributions\/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ( +++$+++ ::: Arzel, AKA has a really good point here: Both in the [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/NYyankees51|SPI]] and in the [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#The_Artist_AKA_Mr_Anonymous|WQA]] you are not arguing the matter, but [[Ad_hominem#Ad_hominem_abuse|"but insulting or belittling one's opponent in order to invalidate his or her argument [...]. This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions."]] [[Special:Contributions/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ([[User talk:82.135.29.209|talk]]) 11:47, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
5798 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5794 +++$+++ 5797 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.288568340E09 +++$+++ Not sure how you can make such a statement when AKA is the one insulting and belittling others.  Note, this section is closed.   +++$+++ :::: Not sure how you can make such a statement when AKA is the one insulting and belittling others.  Note, this section is closed.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 16:39, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
5799 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5794 +++$+++ 5798 +++$+++ 2010-11-02 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.288752120E09 +++$+++ Last word's mine!  +++$+++ ::::: Last word's mine! [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 19:42, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

267941 +++$+++ Singularity42 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267941 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.205359260E09 +++$+++ You recently added the [[dangerous offender]] article to the sex offender registration category. I posted on the article's talk page, questioning the edit, as it didn't seem to be that the article belonged in that category (since 'dangerous offender' is just a sentencing tool, and has no affect on any type of registration). Anyway, since it was your edit, I didn't want to revert it until you had an opportunity to tell me I'm mistaken :P  +++$+++ You recently added the [[dangerous offender]] article to the sex offender registration category. I posted on the article's talk page, questioning the edit, as it didn't seem to be that the article belonged in that category (since 'dangerous offender' is just a sentencing tool, and has no affect on any type of registration). Anyway, since it was your edit, I didn't want to revert it until you had an opportunity to tell me I'm mistaken :P [[User:Singularity42|Singularity42]] ([[User talk:Singularity42|talk]]) 15:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
267942 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267941 +++$+++ 267941 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.205360040E09 +++$+++ Well, it is interesting since in some states \"dangerousness\", or rather the prediction of future dangerousness, is used to justify the indefinite civil commitment of [[sex offenders]] after EOS. That is the only way I have seen it used. (This continues even though there is no measure for future dangerousness.) The Supreme Court has upheld this only in  cases when the offender was a sex offender, as far as I know.  But I am not very good at categories. Maybe you know more about this. I would like to know your ideas.   +++$+++ :Well, it is interesting since in some states "dangerousness", or rather the prediction of future dangerousness, is used to justify the indefinite civil commitment of [[sex offenders]] after EOS. That is the only way I have seen it used. (This continues even though there is no measure for future dangerousness.) The Supreme Court has upheld this only in  cases when the offender was a sex offender, as far as I know.  But I am not very good at categories. Maybe you know more about this. I would like to know your ideas.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

267943 +++$+++ Singularity42 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267943 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.205362920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Singularity42|Singularity42]] ([[User talk:Singularity42|talk]]) 16:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
267944 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267943 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.205364000E09 +++$+++ This is why the Law articles are so confusing! Different countries do things different ways.  Very few offenders besides sex offenders are formally classified as dangerous, really no offender is outside the prison classification system.  Sex offenders are the only persons who have to register in the United States. They are monitored with ankle cuffs, only allowed to live in special zones,  must report any changes, are visited constantly by parole officers, etc. However, a murderer can walk right out at EOS and owes nothing to the state. And all this sex offender stuff is growing in the U.S. There are increasing rules about where sex offenders can live and they have increased reporting duties. We have more and more rules because of all the high-profile sex offender cases. I get an automated telephone call from the Sheriff telling me any time a sex offender moves within three miles of my home!   +++$+++ :::This is why the Law articles are so confusing! Different countries do things different ways.  Very few offenders besides sex offenders are formally classified as dangerous, really no offender is outside the prison classification system.  Sex offenders are the only persons who have to register in the United States. They are monitored with ankle cuffs, only allowed to live in special zones,  must report any changes, are visited constantly by parole officers, etc. However, a murderer can walk right out at EOS and owes nothing to the state. And all this sex offender stuff is growing in the U.S. There are increasing rules about where sex offenders can live and they have increased reporting duties. We have more and more rules because of all the high-profile sex offender cases. I get an automated telephone call from the Sheriff telling me any time a sex offender moves within three miles of my home!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
267945 +++$+++ Singularity42 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267943 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.205365020E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I agree that can be a problem generally for the Law articles. But the [[dangerous offender]] article seems to be 99% focused on the Canadian law, with one sentence on the England & Wales provision. Considering that, at least in Canada, there's no direct connection between Canada's sex offender registry and Canada's dangerous offender designation (the indirect connection being that due to the nature of these type of offences, many dangerous offenders are also on the sex offender registry), should the category at least be changed to something a little more general than registration?  +++$+++ ::::Yeah, I agree that can be a problem generally for the Law articles. But the [[dangerous offender]] article seems to be 99% focused on the Canadian law, with one sentence on the England & Wales provision. Considering that, at least in Canada, there's no direct connection between Canada's sex offender registry and Canada's dangerous offender designation (the indirect connection being that due to the nature of these type of offences, many dangerous offenders are also on the sex offender registry), should the category at least be changed to something a little more general than registration? [[User:Singularity42|Singularity42]] ([[User talk:Singularity42|talk]]) 16:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
267946 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267943 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.205368020E09 +++$+++ Yes, in reading it I find it has nothing at all to do with the U.S. processes. Maybe because Canada is a commonwealth and arranges it's laws differently? I think we need totally different articles. There is no such designation as a \"dangerous offender\". I know from reading court cases that judges do not think there is a way to predict dangerous and they will not do it. The Supreme Court would overturn it anyway, except for sex offenders.   Almost all  well know American offenders  are sex offenders. Check out [[:Category:American rapists]], [[:Category:American serial killers]] (usually sexual), [[:Category:American sex offenders]]. As for  the [[:Category:Murderers of children]] note that there is not even an American list. There is a list for [[:Category:Canadian serial killers]], [[:Category:Canadians convicted of murder]], [[:Category:Canadian mass murderers]], [[:Category:Quebec murderers]]. Are these the \"dangerous offenders? Probably not those covered by [[:Category:Canadian criminals]]? Same category for American is [[:Category:American criminals]]. Look at the difference!   +++$+++ ::::::Yes, in reading it I find it has nothing at all to do with the U.S. processes. Maybe because Canada is a commonwealth and arranges it's laws differently? I think we need totally different articles. There is no such designation as a "dangerous offender". I know from reading court cases that judges do not think there is a way to predict dangerous and they will not do it. The Supreme Court would overturn it anyway, except for sex offenders.   Almost all  well know American offenders  are sex offenders. Check out [[:Category:American rapists]], [[:Category:American serial killers]] (usually sexual), [[:Category:American sex offenders]]. As for  the [[:Category:Murderers of children]] note that there is not even an American list. There is a list for [[:Category:Canadian serial killers]], [[:Category:Canadians convicted of murder]], [[:Category:Canadian mass murderers]], [[:Category:Quebec murderers]]. Are these the "dangerous offenders? Probably not those covered by [[:Category:Canadian criminals]]? Same category for American is [[:Category:American criminals]]. Look at the difference!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
267947 +++$+++ Singularity42 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267943 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.205372880E09 +++$+++ It's also important to realize that the designation cannot apply to first- or second-degree murder. So a list of Canadian serial killers wouldn't necessarily be a list of those designated as a dangerous offender. (This was why Robert Pickton, the recently convicted Canadian serial killer, was not designated a dangerous offender.) Anyway, perhaps it might be better for the article to come under the Sex Offender category rather then the registration one? +++$+++ :::::::It's also important to realize that the designation cannot apply to first- or second-degree murder. So a list of Canadian serial killers wouldn't necessarily be a list of those designated as a dangerous offender. (This was why Robert Pickton, the recently convicted Canadian serial killer, was not designated a dangerous offender.) Anyway, perhaps it might be better for the article to come under the Sex Offender category rather then the registration one?[[User:Singularity42|Singularity42]] ([[User talk:Singularity42|talk]]) 18:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

5800 +++$+++ Soxwon +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5800 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-03 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.288770600E09 +++$+++ But honestly, if they manage to get me blocked, I shan't have any faith in wikipedia anyways. Whatever that tool may say I'm no man's sockpuppet and have plenty of personality to prove it.  +++$+++ But honestly, if they manage to get me blocked, I shan't have any faith in wikipedia anyways. Whatever that tool may say I'm no man's sockpuppet and have plenty of personality to prove it. [[User:Soxwon|Soxwon]] ([[User talk:Soxwon|talk]]) 00:50, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
5801 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5800 +++$+++ 5800 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.288771500E09 +++$+++ I hear you there.   +++$+++ :I hear you there.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 01:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
5802 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5800 +++$+++ 5800 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.288788000E09 +++$+++ You aren't a sock? Dude, you have SOX right in your name; that is such in-your-face-guilt that you should just admit it right now.  Case closed.  +++$+++ :You aren't a sock? Dude, you have SOX right in your name; that is such in-your-face-guilt that you should just admit it right now.  Case closed. [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 05:40, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

88348 +++$+++ Mir Harven +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-09-13 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.095141840E09 +++$+++ I see baby \"Croatian writers\" galore- and this is nothing but rather unethical promo campaign (whoever started it). I guess this \"stubakers\" should be removed into some harmless niche-say, new wave of Cro. sci-fi, but NOT Croatian writers category they dont belong to.  +++$+++ I see baby "Croatian writers" galore- and this is nothing but rather unethical promo campaign (whoever started it). I guess this "stubakers" should be removed into some harmless niche-say, new wave of Cro. sci-fi, but NOT Croatian writers category they dont belong to. [[User:Mir Harven|Mir Harven]] 23:04, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
88349 +++$+++ Mir Harven +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88348 +++$+++ 88348 +++$+++ 2004-09-14 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.095190980E09 +++$+++ OK, napravi novu cat. To je najbolje, da ih se ne bri&#353;e.  +++$+++ : OK, napravi novu cat. To je najbolje, da ih se ne bri&#353;e. [[User:Mir Harven|Mir Harven]] 12:43, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

5803 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-03 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.288788000E09 +++$+++ Arzel, I have a question about your comment about BS24 where you say, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Ronhjones&diff=prev&oldid=394500343 He then starts over without causing any problems, and by all accounts has been a reasonable editor during the past 10 months]. I know that's the narrative he has been pushing, but I think that may be the source of his difficulties right now.  A quick examination of his first 13 edits as BS24 (and the images he uploaded to commons at that time) shows he was still in vandalism mode.  Can you please take a look at those 13 edits & images, and give me an explanation for them that doesn't include vandalism? I'm predicting you can not. He didn't create the BS24 account as a clean start; it was his 7th attempt at evading his block (his prior 6 sock accounts were caught and blocked), and luckily for him no one discovered it was a sock until recently.  Yes, he admitted it, but only <u>after<\/u> an SPI report was filed with evidence making it impossible to deny. Still, I think he has a chance to recover his editing privileges if he drops the little lies he's been telling while trying to save face, and focuses instead on the greater truth that he's been trying to be a productive editor for many months now.  Plenty of admins are willing to go with the redemption route, as long as they don't perceive BS24 is lying to them about certain details.  I notice you offered to help him get his block lifted.  If you feel there is any merit to what I've said, perhaps you can convey it to him (he's not likely to listen to me); or if you disagree with me, just disregard this. Thanks,  +++$+++ Arzel, I have a question about your comment about BS24 where you say, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ronhjones&diff=prev&oldid=394500343 He then starts over without causing any problems, and by all accounts has been a reasonable editor during the past 10 months]. I know that's the narrative he has been pushing, but I think that may be the source of his difficulties right now.  A quick examination of his first 13 edits as BS24 (and the images he uploaded to commons at that time) shows he was still in vandalism mode.  Can you please take a look at those 13 edits & images, and give me an explanation for them that doesn't include vandalism? I'm predicting you can not. He didn't create the BS24 account as a clean start; it was his 7th attempt at evading his block (his prior 6 sock accounts were caught and blocked), and luckily for him no one discovered it was a sock until recently.  Yes, he admitted it, but only <u>after</u> an SPI report was filed with evidence making it impossible to deny. Still, I think he has a chance to recover his editing privileges if he drops the little lies he's been telling while trying to save face, and focuses instead on the greater truth that he's been trying to be a productive editor for many months now.  Plenty of admins are willing to go with the redemption route, as long as they don't perceive BS24 is lying to them about certain details.  I notice you offered to help him get his block lifted.  If you feel there is any merit to what I've said, perhaps you can convey it to him (he's not likely to listen to me); or if you disagree with me, just disregard this. Thanks, [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 05:40, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
5804 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5803 +++$+++ 5803 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.288819620E09 +++$+++ I guess it depends upon your personal definition of reasonable.  Was he perfect, probably not, but then who is.  He obviously felt like no admins were listening to his side of the NYyankees51 story, and by all accounts they were not.  Should he have gone the preferred route regarding NYyankees51, yeah, I would say he should have.  However, if you look at his history as BS24 for the past months he has been a reasonable editor.  At least as reasonable as most people.  You say his first 13 edits are not reasonable, and maybe they were not but what matters is what he is doing in recent history.  Blocks are supposed to be corrective, and the actions regarding NYyankees51 seem to have resulted in that corrective behaviour.  What is the point of redemtion if there is a vindictive attitude that says, \"Yeah I know you have been pretty good the past few months, but it doesn't matter because you did something wrong 10 months ago.\"   +++$+++ :I guess it depends upon your personal definition of reasonable.  Was he perfect, probably not, but then who is.  He obviously felt like no admins were listening to his side of the NYyankees51 story, and by all accounts they were not.  Should he have gone the preferred route regarding NYyankees51, yeah, I would say he should have.  However, if you look at his history as BS24 for the past months he has been a reasonable editor.  At least as reasonable as most people.  You say his first 13 edits are not reasonable, and maybe they were not but what matters is what he is doing in recent history.  Blocks are supposed to be corrective, and the actions regarding NYyankees51 seem to have resulted in that corrective behaviour.  What is the point of redemtion if there is a vindictive attitude that says, "Yeah I know you have been pretty good the past few months, but it doesn't matter because you did something wrong 10 months ago."  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 14:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
5805 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5803 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.289033580E09 +++$+++ I think you missed the point of my comment.  I personally have no doubt he was involved in some juvenile antics with one or more friends\/family, and it included article vandalism.  I also agree that he has maintained a marginally productive edit history in recent months (he still needs work on edit warring, civility, combative attitude ... but there are certainly worse editors that are not blocked).  The point I was making is if he wants to salvage his BS24 account (or his NYyankees51 account, if admins so insist), he needs to quit morphing his story and excuses at every turn. Admins don't want to be spending time on this crap, so if he just admits his wrongs, apologizes and promises it won't happen again, the admins will eagerly jump on it and give him a pass. (Much to Mr. Anon's chagrin, I'm sure...) But the longer he plays the defense & excuse game of trying to justify BS24 as a \"clean start\" and insisting he did nothing wrong when creating it, or claiming he didn't know what \"avoiding scrutiny\" was ... he's just begging to have admins (or worse, his fan club of Wikipedia editors that don't like him) pick apart his every word.  As his self-appointed defense attorney, you should have advised him to roll over and play dead, so that the admins would give him \"one more chance\" just to close the books on this issue.  Just my opinion, of course.  +++$+++ :::I think you missed the point of my comment.  I personally have no doubt he was involved in some juvenile antics with one or more friends/family, and it included article vandalism.  I also agree that he has maintained a marginally productive edit history in recent months (he still needs work on edit warring, civility, combative attitude ... but there are certainly worse editors that are not blocked).  The point I was making is if he wants to salvage his BS24 account (or his NYyankees51 account, if admins so insist), he needs to quit morphing his story and excuses at every turn. Admins don't want to be spending time on this crap, so if he just admits his wrongs, apologizes and promises it won't happen again, the admins will eagerly jump on it and give him a pass. (Much to Mr. Anon's chagrin, I'm sure...) But the longer he plays the defense & excuse game of trying to justify BS24 as a "clean start" and insisting he did nothing wrong when creating it, or claiming he didn't know what "avoiding scrutiny" was ... he's just begging to have admins (or worse, his fan club of Wikipedia editors that don't like him) pick apart his every word.  As his self-appointed defense attorney, you should have advised him to roll over and play dead, so that the admins would give him "one more chance" just to close the books on this issue.  Just my opinion, of course. [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 01:53, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5806 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5803 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.289035860E09 +++$+++ It is my assumption that he is telling the truth, so telling him to roll over just didn't factor into my logic.  I believe in playing it straight, also, I don't think AKA or 82 would allow him to play dead.  They seem pretty insistant of trying to shoot holes in his history (you are not helping matters either).  Certainly, he has made a couple of contridictory statements, but given that this happened almost a year ago I am not surprised that he might get a couple of facts wrong.  However, if you look at his actions during this time it is easy to see how it was something juvenile.  The history of the edits between IP68 and NYyankees clearly support his general story.  Also, if he was a habitual sock user, then why has there been no suspected socks in relation to the RTH mediation.  If ever there was a time for a sock user to employ socks it would have been then to strengthen his argument.  His actions do not conform to disruptive sock abuse outside of the incident almost one year ago.   +++$+++ ::::It is my assumption that he is telling the truth, so telling him to roll over just didn't factor into my logic.  I believe in playing it straight, also, I don't think AKA or 82 would allow him to play dead.  They seem pretty insistant of trying to shoot holes in his history (you are not helping matters either).  Certainly, he has made a couple of contridictory statements, but given that this happened almost a year ago I am not surprised that he might get a couple of facts wrong.  However, if you look at his actions during this time it is easy to see how it was something juvenile.  The history of the edits between IP68 and NYyankees clearly support his general story.  Also, if he was a habitual sock user, then why has there been no suspected socks in relation to the RTH mediation.  If ever there was a time for a sock user to employ socks it would have been then to strengthen his argument.  His actions do not conform to disruptive sock abuse outside of the incident almost one year ago.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 02:31, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5807 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5803 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.289037000E09 +++$+++ Well, there are suspected socks since the Restore Honor mediation, although I'm not sure how strong the suspicion is.  And yeah, I know I appear to be part of the \"pile-on\" in the BS24 situation, but I just interject to correct errors -- sometimes even those made by admins.  I'm ambivalent as to whether BS24 is blocked or not (as I'm certain he will be editing Wikipedia for a long time to come, one way or another), but I will speak up when I see blatant falsifications.  You never did give me your opinion about his first 13 edits as BS24 -- and the images he uploaded.  He has told some truths, and he has lied a bit -- and unfortunately, he lied when he said BS24 was created as a clean start effort.  He may have slowly developed it into an account he decided to keep, and is now fighting to keep, but it most certainly didn't start that way.  I could easily have been convinced that he is not \"a habitual sock user\", if it weren't for all the other deception involved in this mess right now.  +++$+++ :::::Well, there are suspected socks since the Restore Honor mediation, although I'm not sure how strong the suspicion is.  And yeah, I know I appear to be part of the "pile-on" in the BS24 situation, but I just interject to correct errors -- sometimes even those made by admins.  I'm ambivalent as to whether BS24 is blocked or not (as I'm certain he will be editing Wikipedia for a long time to come, one way or another), but I will speak up when I see blatant falsifications.  You never did give me your opinion about his first 13 edits as BS24 -- and the images he uploaded.  He has told some truths, and he has lied a bit -- and unfortunately, he lied when he said BS24 was created as a clean start effort.  He may have slowly developed it into an account he decided to keep, and is now fighting to keep, but it most certainly didn't start that way.  I could easily have been convinced that he is not "a habitual sock user", if it weren't for all the other deception involved in this mess right now. [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 02:50, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5808 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5803 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.289038500E09 +++$+++ I don't know the specifics of the situations he was referring to, so it is hard to judge.  The one image is gone, I don't understand the other image.  It doesn't appear on the surface to be anything that egregious, at least not compared to most of the crap that people put on WP.  So I don't quite know where you are going with this.   +++$+++ :::::::I don't know the specifics of the situations he was referring to, so it is hard to judge.  The one image is gone, I don't understand the other image.  It doesn't appear on the surface to be anything that egregious, at least not compared to most of the crap that people put on WP.  So I don't quite know where you are going with this.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 03:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5809 +++$+++ 82.135.29.209 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5803 +++$+++ 5804 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.288891260E09 +++$+++ Arzel, it wasn't just 10 month ago... As one of many samples: Less than one month ago an IP made a valid change which was well substantiated by a new source[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Washington,_D.C._mayoral_election,_2010&diff=prev&oldid=390542895]. But then BS24 reverted that change and gave the user a dressing-down \"Please [...] read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.\"[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:150.148.0.65#October_2010]. Treating new editors in such a way makes it harder to gain and retain motivated and constructive Wikipedia contributors, hurting Wikipedia. Do you think this such contributions of BS24 are \"reasonable\"? Over the time, BS24 made many good edits, but also various bad edits. I'm absolutely in favor of giving everyone new chances. I just think for using a second change it is a better idea to signal understanding of wrong behavior in the past and indicate  changed behavior for the future (which really does not hurt, which I know from [[User_talk:82.135.29.209#Restoring_Honor_rally|own experience]]). He should be careful which path to take. [[Special:Contributions\/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ( +++$+++ ::Arzel, it wasn't just 10 month ago... As one of many samples: Less than one month ago an IP made a valid change which was well substantiated by a new source[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Washington,_D.C._mayoral_election,_2010&diff=prev&oldid=390542895]. But then BS24 reverted that change and gave the user a dressing-down "Please [...] read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia."[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:150.148.0.65#October_2010]. Treating new editors in such a way makes it harder to gain and retain motivated and constructive Wikipedia contributors, hurting Wikipedia. Do you think this such contributions of BS24 are "reasonable"? Over the time, BS24 made many good edits, but also various bad edits. I'm absolutely in favor of giving everyone new chances. I just think for using a second change it is a better idea to signal understanding of wrong behavior in the past and indicate  changed behavior for the future (which really does not hurt, which I know from [[User_talk:82.135.29.209#Restoring_Honor_rally|own experience]]). He should be careful which path to take. [[Special:Contributions/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ([[User talk:82.135.29.209|talk]]) 10:21, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
5810 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5803 +++$+++ 5809 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.288903740E09 +++$+++ Give me a break.  You stalk BS24 to other articles and revert him out of spite and claim he is the one that needs to work on his editing?  That IP editor that you ran to defend has a history of making edits that don't match sources.   +++$+++ :::Give me a break.  You stalk BS24 to other articles and revert him out of spite and claim he is the one that needs to work on his editing?  That IP editor that you ran to defend has a history of making edits that don't match sources.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 13:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
5811 +++$+++ 82.135.29.209 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5803 +++$+++ 5810 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.288928280E09 +++$+++ It's simple: BS24 reverted an substantiated edit from me by ridiculously claiming that it was vandalism. And then, after the \"fresh start\" discussion started in the SPI, I was interested into finding out if he did this to others, too. And therefore I was looking into the history of BS24. Note that this IP edit was perfectly reasonable and matching the sources - please verify it! Look at the SPI page, it's all documented, readable for everyone, including admins. Ok, you tell me again [[Ad_hominem#Ad_hominem_abuse|how @&$\xa7?*# I am because of all this]]. But I notic that you don't try to defend these recent BS24 edits as \"reasonable\". [[Special:Contributions\/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ( +++$+++ ::::It's simple: BS24 reverted an substantiated edit from me by ridiculously claiming that it was vandalism. And then, after the "fresh start" discussion started in the SPI, I was interested into finding out if he did this to others, too. And therefore I was looking into the history of BS24. Note that this IP edit was perfectly reasonable and matching the sources - please verify it! Look at the SPI page, it's all documented, readable for everyone, including admins. Ok, you tell me again [[Ad_hominem#Ad_hominem_abuse|how @&$§?*# I am because of all this]]. But I notic that you don't try to defend these recent BS24 edits as "reasonable". [[Special:Contributions/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ([[User talk:82.135.29.209|talk]]) 20:38, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
5812 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5803 +++$+++ 5811 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.289036820E09 +++$+++ I don't see any edit from BS24 where he called your edit vandalism.  The IP150 edit that he reverted was not with malice, so I don't know what your problem is.  +++$+++ :::::I don't see any edit from BS24 where he called your edit vandalism.  The IP150 edit that he reverted was not with malice, so I don't know what your problem is. [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 02:47, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5813 +++$+++ 82.135.29.209 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5803 +++$+++ 5812 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.289065500E09 +++$+++ Regarding vandalism: Again, look at the SPI page, it's all documented. Or you also can just look at the first entry of my talk page. Regarding IP150: The problem is not the edit of that IP, but BS24's reaction to it. Also here, please look at the SPI page. I have the impression that you are not very familiar with the facts of the SPI. [[Special:Contributions\/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ( +++$+++ ::::::Regarding vandalism: Again, look at the SPI page, it's all documented. Or you also can just look at the first entry of my talk page. Regarding IP150: The problem is not the edit of that IP, but BS24's reaction to it. Also here, please look at the SPI page. I have the impression that you are not very familiar with the facts of the SPI. [[Special:Contributions/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ([[User talk:82.135.29.209|talk]]) 10:45, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

267948 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267948 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.205368800E09 +++$+++ Read this [http:\/\/books.apa.org\/books.cfm?id=431694A Protecting Society from Sexually Dangerous Offenders: Law, Justice, and Therap ]   +++$+++ Read this [http://books.apa.org/books.cfm?id=431694A Protecting Society from Sexually Dangerous Offenders: Law, Justice, and Therap ]  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
267949 +++$+++ Singularity42 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267948 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.205372880E09 +++$+++ It looks like an interesting book. But I think it's important to keep in mind the difference between calling someone a dangerous offender or sexually dangerous offender because of public notions of what 'dangerousness' means, and someone being designated as a \"Dangerous Offender\" under [http:\/\/www.canlii.org\/eliisa\/highlight.do?language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=\/ca\/sta\/c-46\/sec753.html s. 753 of the Criminal Code of Canada]  +++$+++ ::It looks like an interesting book. But I think it's important to keep in mind the difference between calling someone a dangerous offender or sexually dangerous offender because of public notions of what 'dangerousness' means, and someone being designated as a "Dangerous Offender" under [http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=/ca/sta/c-46/sec753.html s. 753 of the Criminal Code of Canada] [[User:Singularity42|Singularity42]] ([[User talk:Singularity42|talk]]) 18:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
267950 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267948 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.205373600E09 +++$+++ Such a designation as \"dangerousness\" would be made by the court. But because there is no reliable scientific evidence that future dangerous can be predicted, even by expert witnesses  -- in fact quite the opposite -- courts cannot  designate a person as dangerous as it would violate [[Due process]]  and be overturned by the Supreme Court. The is the U.S. Constitution. That is why we have no such designation.   +++$+++ :::Such a designation as "dangerousness" would be made by the court. But because there is no reliable scientific evidence that future dangerous can be predicted, even by expert witnesses  -- in fact quite the opposite -- courts cannot  designate a person as dangerous as it would violate [[Due process]]  and be overturned by the Supreme Court. The is the U.S. Constitution. That is why we have no such designation.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
267951 +++$+++ Singularity42 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267948 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.205377680E09 +++$+++ Absolutely true, and the same right is protected under the Canadian Constitution. I think the difficulty here is to forget that the title \"Dangerous Offender\" is just a title for a type of sentence. Imagine two titles: \"Special Sentence A\" and \"Special Sentence B\". If a person has been convicted of certain offences, meets certain criteria in relation to those offences, and there is an expert opinion regarding their ability to be rehabilitiated, and a court decides that the person is a serious threat to the community and it is not reasonable to believe they can be rehabilitated, then [[Canadian criminal law]] states that they recieve \"Special Sentence A\", and are given an indefinite prison term, reviewable after seven years, and then every three. If they are a serious threat, but there is a chance of rehabilitation, then they recieve \"Special Sentence B\", and are given a definite prison term, with a long-term rehabiliation program. If they are not a serious threat and\/or don't meet the criteria, then the normal sentencing provisions apply. The court's not deciding future dangerousness. Now just change the wording of \"Special Sentence A\" to \"Dangerous Offender\" and \"Special Sentence B\" to \"Long-Term Offender\". In [http:\/\/www.canlii.org\/eliisa\/highlight.do?language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=\/en\/ca\/scc\/doc\/1987\/1987canlii25\/1987canlii25.html this case], the Supreme Court of Canada found that these provisions of the Criminal Code don't violate the [[Canadian Constitution]] (specifically the [[Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]). The Court has stated: \"The individual, on a finding of guilty, is being sentenced for the 'serious personal injury offence' for which he was convicted, albeit in a different way than would ordinarily be done. He is not being punished for what he might do. The punishment flows from the actual commission of a specific offence.\"  +++$+++ ::::Absolutely true, and the same right is protected under the Canadian Constitution. I think the difficulty here is to forget that the title "Dangerous Offender" is just a title for a type of sentence. Imagine two titles: "Special Sentence A" and "Special Sentence B". If a person has been convicted of certain offences, meets certain criteria in relation to those offences, and there is an expert opinion regarding their ability to be rehabilitiated, and a court decides that the person is a serious threat to the community and it is not reasonable to believe they can be rehabilitated, then [[Canadian criminal law]] states that they recieve "Special Sentence A", and are given an indefinite prison term, reviewable after seven years, and then every three. If they are a serious threat, but there is a chance of rehabilitation, then they recieve "Special Sentence B", and are given a definite prison term, with a long-term rehabiliation program. If they are not a serious threat and/or don't meet the criteria, then the normal sentencing provisions apply. The court's not deciding future dangerousness. Now just change the wording of "Special Sentence A" to "Dangerous Offender" and "Special Sentence B" to "Long-Term Offender". In [http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=/en/ca/scc/doc/1987/1987canlii25/1987canlii25.html this case], the Supreme Court of Canada found that these provisions of the Criminal Code don't violate the [[Canadian Constitution]] (specifically the [[Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]). The Court has stated: "The individual, on a finding of guilty, is being sentenced for the 'serious personal injury offence' for which he was convicted, albeit in a different way than would ordinarily be done. He is not being punished for what he might do. The punishment flows from the actual commission of a specific offence." [[User:Singularity42|Singularity42]] ([[User talk:Singularity42|talk]]) 20:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

530095 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530095 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-01 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.235910900E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the speedy tag on Norton AV article.  TechOutsider has been looking for directions to go, and is doing a tremendous job on the Norton articles.  When he suggested that it was too difficult to maintain so many different articles, and said that they all really belong to NIS - I suggested that he go ahead, copy everything over to NIS he wanted to and then PROD the ones he was done with.  I should have been more specific - but ''damn'' that kid is fast! LOL .. mention an idea, and he's off and running.  Sometimes I think he's got too many irons in the fire ;) ... ahhhh would that I was that young and full of gusto again.  I'm trying to just do a merge from a recent close, answer his questions, and feel like I'm behind on two other articles I'm trying to work on.  How one gets behind on work in a volunteer site I haven't figured out yet - but I seem to have unique ability in that area.  I also do work with our local Emergency Response Team, VFD, PD ... sorry - I start typing and don't know when to shutup.  I'll try to keep things sorted out the best I can, he wants me to do a RfC on a name change \/ move too ... but, I'd rather wait until he gets a little further along.  Thanks for fixin the speedy to a merge.  Have a good one. ;) \u2014  +++$+++ Sorry for the speedy tag on Norton AV article.  TechOutsider has been looking for directions to go, and is doing a tremendous job on the Norton articles.  When he suggested that it was too difficult to maintain so many different articles, and said that they all really belong to NIS - I suggested that he go ahead, copy everything over to NIS he wanted to and then PROD the ones he was done with.  I should have been more specific - but ''damn'' that kid is fast! LOL .. mention an idea, and he's off and running.  Sometimes I think he's got too many irons in the fire ;) ... ahhhh would that I was that young and full of gusto again.  I'm trying to just do a merge from a recent close, answer his questions, and feel like I'm behind on two other articles I'm trying to work on.  How one gets behind on work in a volunteer site I haven't figured out yet - but I seem to have unique ability in that area.  I also do work with our local Emergency Response Team, VFD, PD ... sorry - I start typing and don't know when to shutup.  I'll try to keep things sorted out the best I can, he wants me to do a RfC on a name change / move too ... but, I'd rather wait until he gets a little further along.  Thanks for fixin the speedy to a merge.  Have a good one. ;) — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 04:35, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
530096 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530095 +++$+++ 530095 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.235912700E09 +++$+++ In that case, I would expect Norton Antivirus to be a redirect and not a prod. It used to be a famous product - I had bought copies! It's extremely EASY to get behind on what you'd like to accomplish here! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :In that case, I would expect Norton Antivirus to be a redirect and not a prod. It used to be a famous product - I had bought copies! It's extremely EASY to get behind on what you'd like to accomplish here! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
530097 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530095 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.235913960E09 +++$+++ LOL at getting behind, and yep - you're right on redirect - I should have been thinking further ahead.  re: Heidelberg Raceway YES! YES! YES!  I had let that one go for a bit, I found what I could on the web, then asked the toughest \"delete\" admin. I could find (Orangemike) - and he said it wouldn't automatically transfer notability (Lee Petty winning first race).  I was at the Carnegie library last week, and they are having the local historical society transfer stuff to them - so I'll finally be able to get some good refs.  ANYTHING you have would be '''greatly''' appreciated!  Wherever you want to work on it, just let me know, and I'll be there! Come to think of it - that's where I've seen your name before - the Tim Richmond article I have watchlisted ... wow, small wiki - LOL \u2014  +++$+++ :::LOL at getting behind, and yep - you're right on redirect - I should have been thinking further ahead.  re: Heidelberg Raceway YES! YES! YES!  I had let that one go for a bit, I found what I could on the web, then asked the toughest "delete" admin. I could find (Orangemike) - and he said it wouldn't automatically transfer notability (Lee Petty winning first race).  I was at the Carnegie library last week, and they are having the local historical society transfer stuff to them - so I'll finally be able to get some good refs.  ANYTHING you have would be '''greatly''' appreciated!  Wherever you want to work on it, just let me know, and I'll be there! Come to think of it - that's where I've seen your name before - the Tim Richmond article I have watchlisted ... wow, small wiki - LOL — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 05:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
530098 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530095 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.235914140E09 +++$+++ I also have the programs from last years that they existed (I used to sell them there).  So I've got stats on who won championships and stuff.  I'm still in touch with a couple drivers too - but most of that would be OR, but might have some clippings. \u2014  +++$+++ :::I also have the programs from last years that they existed (I used to sell them there).  So I've got stats on who won championships and stuff.  I'm still in touch with a couple drivers too - but most of that would be OR, but might have some clippings. — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 05:29, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
530099 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530095 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.235914740E09 +++$+++ Sure that would be great - I'd be honored!  The Richmond article has come a ''long'' way in a short time - great work! (I noticed you didn't comment on delete admin - current Arbcom or anything ;)) \u2014  +++$+++ ::::Sure that would be great - I'd be honored!  The Richmond article has come a ''long'' way in a short time - great work! (I noticed you didn't comment on delete admin - current Arbcom or anything ;)) — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 05:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
530100 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530095 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.235916120E09 +++$+++ Great!  Yep, I agree, Mike seems like a nice guy, but I haven't really worked with him on anything.  I was surprised when he told me he didn't follow NASCAR, I thought everyone in TN. did ... lulz.  That wasn't really what I was (ok I admit it ..) ''trolling'' for.  I was curious about how you felt about the user pages that were deleted because they had secret pages or hidden pages or guestbook pages on them.  Personally I think it's too much fuss over too minor an issue, but that's just me.  I always figured, as long as they're contributing to the project, they're not attacking anyone, and they're not violating any copyvio policy - what they do on their user-space shouldn't be a big deal.  But that's just me, maybe I haven't been here long enough to to form an ''informed'' opinion.  I was just curious, none of my business though really. I'm looking forward to working with you, I hope to get some of the older drivers worked on too ... Rex White, etc. \u2014  +++$+++ :::::Great!  Yep, I agree, Mike seems like a nice guy, but I haven't really worked with him on anything.  I was surprised when he told me he didn't follow NASCAR, I thought everyone in TN. did ... lulz.  That wasn't really what I was (ok I admit it ..) ''trolling'' for.  I was curious about how you felt about the user pages that were deleted because they had secret pages or hidden pages or guestbook pages on them.  Personally I think it's too much fuss over too minor an issue, but that's just me.  I always figured, as long as they're contributing to the project, they're not attacking anyone, and they're not violating any copyvio policy - what they do on their user-space shouldn't be a big deal.  But that's just me, maybe I haven't been here long enough to to form an ''informed'' opinion.  I was just curious, none of my business though really. I'm looking forward to working with you, I hope to get some of the older drivers worked on too ... Rex White, etc. — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 06:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

267953 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267953 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.205379660E09 +++$+++ (outdent) The problem is that the Supreme Court has made it quite clear that \"dangerousness\" is not a sufficient reason for civil commitment for the reasons outlined above. If a person is considered \"dangerous\" by some, but there is no other reason for his commitment (like an active mental disorder predisposing him to violence, a record of recent violent behavior while incarcerated - stabbing people and the like)  then \"dangerous\" alone is not sufficient. (We are excluding here a person being held for up to 72 hours in the community  for psychiatric evaluation as a danger to self or others.)  However, if experts in court are willing to state that  a sex offender at EOS,  is likely to continue to be dangerous (and there is consensus in the field that sex offenders cannot be cured - even John Money gave in after all these years), then the combination allows some jurisdictions to civilly commit such a person. Not all states have accepted this stance, but the number is growing. It is still rather \"iffy\" because the judgment is based on prediction and mental health experts concede they are generally not able to do that. So far, cases going to the Supreme Court have supported it, but we will have a new court soon and it may be overturned and no longer allowed.   +++$+++ (outdent) The problem is that the Supreme Court has made it quite clear that "dangerousness" is not a sufficient reason for civil commitment for the reasons outlined above. If a person is considered "dangerous" by some, but there is no other reason for his commitment (like an active mental disorder predisposing him to violence, a record of recent violent behavior while incarcerated - stabbing people and the like)  then "dangerous" alone is not sufficient. (We are excluding here a person being held for up to 72 hours in the community  for psychiatric evaluation as a danger to self or others.)  However, if experts in court are willing to state that  a sex offender at EOS,  is likely to continue to be dangerous (and there is consensus in the field that sex offenders cannot be cured - even John Money gave in after all these years), then the combination allows some jurisdictions to civilly commit such a person. Not all states have accepted this stance, but the number is growing. It is still rather "iffy" because the judgment is based on prediction and mental health experts concede they are generally not able to do that. So far, cases going to the Supreme Court have supported it, but we will have a new court soon and it may be overturned and no longer allowed.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
267954 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267953 +++$+++ 267953 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.205380080E09 +++$+++ I think we need separate articles. Only sex offenders have to register in the US. No one else does, so \"Offender registration\" is misleading.  The rest of the article has to do with Canadian law and is not relevant to American law anyway. In fact, so many of the law articles are such a mess because they try to cover too much. I don't know how to deal with this but maybe we can think of a way. I can't read those law article; that is why I usually write my own. Can you think of any ideas?  +++$+++ :I think we need separate articles. Only sex offenders have to register in the US. No one else does, so "Offender registration" is misleading.  The rest of the article has to do with Canadian law and is not relevant to American law anyway. In fact, so many of the law articles are such a mess because they try to cover too much. I don't know how to deal with this but maybe we can think of a way. I can't read those law article; that is why I usually write my own. Can you think of any ideas? [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

267955 +++$+++ Benjiboi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-16 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.205655060E09 +++$+++ Please do not add controversial and inappropriate categories to biographies of living people. This violates Wikipedias policies on [[WP:BLP|biographies]] and doesn't help the project. Specifically the article spells out that the person was convicted of being in possession of child pornography, we have to stick to the facts only, especially with controversial material. Likewise, this \"blurring\" of a category diminishes the real harm of child sexual offenders and I imagine that would run counter to those who want to ensure wikipedia accurately presents such content. If the subject becomes eligible for one of the categories    then I fully support their inclusion. For example, I have removed some mainstream films from the Anti-Catholic category as they really didn't fit that definition and inclusion there diminished the real impact from those subjects who were correctly a part of that category. Once we have sourced documentation that supports inclusion then the category is warranted.  +++$+++ Please do not add controversial and inappropriate categories to biographies of living people. This violates Wikipedias policies on [[WP:BLP|biographies]] and doesn't help the project. Specifically the article spells out that the person was convicted of being in possession of child pornography, we have to stick to the facts only, especially with controversial material. Likewise, this "blurring" of a category diminishes the real harm of child sexual offenders and I imagine that would run counter to those who want to ensure wikipedia accurately presents such content. If the subject becomes eligible for one of the categories    then I fully support their inclusion. For example, I have removed some mainstream films from the Anti-Catholic category as they really didn't fit that definition and inclusion there diminished the real impact from those subjects who were correctly a part of that category. Once we have sourced documentation that supports inclusion then the category is warranted. [[User:Benjiboi|<u style="text-decoration:none;font-family: papyrus;color:#CC00CC">Benji</u>]][[User_talk:Benjiboi|<u style="text-decoration:none;font:98% cursive;color:#8000FF">boi</u>]] 01:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
267956 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267955 +++$+++ 267955 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.205655660E09 +++$+++ I did not add anything to the articles themselves. In fact, I questioned their suitability myself. I tried to put them in categories based on what was in the articles already. Sorry if I offended you. I just could not believe the mess it was all in. I probably got carried away, as this is my profession and I was startled to see how inaccurate it all was. I did have to correct some articles on U.S. law regarding the commitment of sex offenders, as what was written was quite off-base. I wrote  [[U.S. Supreme Court]] decision articles to back myself up. Again, I apologize if I startled you. I did attempt to have a dialog with someone working on categories and sex offenders, but he refused to consider anything but Canadian law. Then he put a category up for deletion that we had been discussing without telling me! Selfishly, since I use Wikipedia to keep track of case law for myself, I want things to be accurate for me! Regards,  +++$+++ :I did not add anything to the articles themselves. In fact, I questioned their suitability myself. I tried to put them in categories based on what was in the articles already. Sorry if I offended you. I just could not believe the mess it was all in. I probably got carried away, as this is my profession and I was startled to see how inaccurate it all was. I did have to correct some articles on U.S. law regarding the commitment of sex offenders, as what was written was quite off-base. I wrote  [[U.S. Supreme Court]] decision articles to back myself up. Again, I apologize if I startled you. I did attempt to have a dialog with someone working on categories and sex offenders, but he refused to consider anything but Canadian law. Then he put a category up for deletion that we had been discussing without telling me! Selfishly, since I use Wikipedia to keep track of case law for myself, I want things to be accurate for me! Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
267957 +++$+++ Benjiboi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267955 +++$+++ 267956 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.205659560E09 +++$+++ I wasn't offended but, it seems, we both want a better encyclopedia. Sometimes categories themselves are a bit messy. If the defining text of what the category is for or even the title is wrong consider fixing it and discussing improvements on the talk page. If someone is semantically caught up on variations from country to country then maybe clarify, In the United States blah, in Canada it's actually blah-de-blah, see ____ for more information. We should present multiple viewpoints accurately.  +++$+++ ::I wasn't offended but, it seems, we both want a better encyclopedia. Sometimes categories themselves are a bit messy. If the defining text of what the category is for or even the title is wrong consider fixing it and discussing improvements on the talk page. If someone is semantically caught up on variations from country to country then maybe clarify, In the United States blah, in Canada it's actually blah-de-blah, see ____ for more information. We should present multiple viewpoints accurately. [[User:Benjiboi|<u style="text-decoration:none;font-family: papyrus;color:#CC00CC">Benji</u>]][[User_talk:Benjiboi|<u style="text-decoration:none;font:98% cursive;color:#8000FF">boi</u>]] 02:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
267958 +++$+++ Benjiboi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267955 +++$+++ 267956 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.205659680E09 +++$+++ Also the categories are a part of the article and the talk page is also covered under [[WP:BLP]].  +++$+++ ::Also the categories are a part of the article and the talk page is also covered under [[WP:BLP]]. [[User:Benjiboi|<u style="text-decoration:none;font-family: papyrus;color:#CC00CC">Benji</u>]][[User_talk:Benjiboi|<u style="text-decoration:none;font:98% cursive;color:#8000FF">boi</u>]] 02:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
267959 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267955 +++$+++ 267958 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.205660760E09 +++$+++ Very very few of the articles, if any,  I categorized today were BLP. I am always aware and conservative about BLP. That is one of the reasons why I was so surprised by what I saw going on in  [[:Category:Sex crimes]]. I work on categories a lot.  Categories can be improved, usually dramatically.  I just head for the category of \"[[:Category:Wikipedia categories in need of attention|Bad categories]]\", then [[:Category:Very large categories|Very large categories]] at the the Wikipedia portal. Only the hopeless categories are  there, those that have been a problem for a long time.  That is where [[:Category:Sex crimes]] is. I guess the Sex Offender category is a bit touchy as I have never had anyone object before to my categorizing.  Sorry! Regards,  +++$+++ :::Very very few of the articles, if any,  I categorized today were BLP. I am always aware and conservative about BLP. That is one of the reasons why I was so surprised by what I saw going on in  [[:Category:Sex crimes]]. I work on categories a lot.  Categories can be improved, usually dramatically.  I just head for the category of "[[:Category:Wikipedia categories in need of attention|Bad categories]]", then [[:Category:Very large categories|Very large categories]] at the the Wikipedia portal. Only the hopeless categories are  there, those that have been a problem for a long time.  That is where [[:Category:Sex crimes]] is. I guess the Sex Offender category is a bit touchy as I have never had anyone object before to my categorizing.  Sorry! Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
267960 +++$+++ Benjiboi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267955 +++$+++ 267959 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.205666460E09 +++$+++ No worries!  +++$+++ ::::No worries! [[User:Benjiboi|<u style="text-decoration:none;font-family: papyrus;color:#CC00CC">Benji</u>]][[User_talk:Benjiboi|<u style="text-decoration:none;font:98% cursive;color:#8000FF">boi</u>]] 04:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

530101 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530101 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-01 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.235956680E09 +++$+++ I also spent some time at GA talk this morning, getting an understanding of how that all works - let me know when you post the Richmond article, so I can follow along and soak in some education.  Not sure where I'm taking my mom for vacation this fall yet, but do you have any idea what kind of field Slinger Speedway is going to have this year?  Well, also, also, also - doesn't exactly qualify as quality standards for articles - lol, but this is only a talk page, so hopefully my actual edits will be better ;) \u2014  +++$+++ I also spent some time at GA talk this morning, getting an understanding of how that all works - let me know when you post the Richmond article, so I can follow along and soak in some education.  Not sure where I'm taking my mom for vacation this fall yet, but do you have any idea what kind of field Slinger Speedway is going to have this year?  Well, also, also, also - doesn't exactly qualify as quality standards for articles - lol, but this is only a talk page, so hopefully my actual edits will be better ;) — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 17:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
530102 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530101 +++$+++ 530101 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.235970300E09 +++$+++ Speaking of Alan Kulwicki - I improved that article to [[WP:FAC|Featured Article candidate]]. It didn't pass but it's not far away. So there might be some more content to add to it - just make sure that you cite to make sure that it remains a [[WP:GA]]. I'll let you know when I nom Richmond for GA. I think it's already good enough to pass GA, but I want to flesh out some of the NASCAR information on each season. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Speaking of Alan Kulwicki - I improved that article to [[WP:FAC|Featured Article candidate]]. It didn't pass but it's not far away. So there might be some more content to add to it - just make sure that you cite to make sure that it remains a [[WP:GA]]. I'll let you know when I nom Richmond for GA. I think it's already good enough to pass GA, but I want to flesh out some of the NASCAR information on each season. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 21:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
530103 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530101 +++$+++ 530102 +++$+++ 2009-03-02 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.235996040E09 +++$+++ How'd ya like that drifting move by Jamie Mac today? ... lol - great!  Well, I'll try to keep it short this time ;) \u2014  +++$+++ ::How'd ya like that drifting move by Jamie Mac today? ... lol - great!  Well, I'll try to keep it short this time ;) — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 04:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
530104 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530101 +++$+++ 530103 +++$+++ 2009-03-02 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.235996160E09 +++$+++ Would love to meet-up.  Have done that many times over the years, meeting folks from www-world. Texas, Arizona, Alabama, and of course here at home in PA.  Always a great time! \u2014  +++$+++ :::Would love to meet-up.  Have done that many times over the years, meeting folks from www-world. Texas, Arizona, Alabama, and of course here at home in PA.  Always a great time! — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 04:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
530105 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530101 +++$+++ 530104 +++$+++ 2009-03-03 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.236078780E09 +++$+++ Hey Royal, sure, I'll take a look at it.  I'll let you know further along in the summer what travel plans are too.  I look forward to the GA process, I've never watched one in action, but I've been reading through some in the last couple days.  May be a little while before I dig out the AK article, but I will see what I've got (if anything) that's not already in the article.  Not sure if I have any decent pics of him back in his ASA days or not, saw plenty of his races, but there was a while when I had gotten away from the camera, so I'm not sure.  I'll read through the Richmond article within the next day or so. ;) \u2014  +++$+++ ::::Hey Royal, sure, I'll take a look at it.  I'll let you know further along in the summer what travel plans are too.  I look forward to the GA process, I've never watched one in action, but I've been reading through some in the last couple days.  May be a little while before I dig out the AK article, but I will see what I've got (if anything) that's not already in the article.  Not sure if I have any decent pics of him back in his ASA days or not, saw plenty of his races, but there was a while when I had gotten away from the camera, so I'm not sure.  I'll read through the Richmond article within the next day or so. ;) — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 03:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

394185 +++$+++ Tedickey +++$+++ Daven200520 +++$+++ 394185 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-02 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.280761200E09 +++$+++ [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATedickey&action=historysubmit&diff=376719206&oldid=374886920 here] - I removed a see-also to a link placed by a COI-editor pointing to a topic about himself, which duplicated an existing link on the same topic.  Exactly what is <em>your<\/em> reason for the template on my user page?  +++$+++ [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATedickey&action=historysubmit&diff=376719206&oldid=374886920 here] - I removed a see-also to a link placed by a COI-editor pointing to a topic about himself, which duplicated an existing link on the same topic.  Exactly what is <em>your</em> reason for the template on my user page? [[User:Tedickey|TEDickey]] ([[User talk:Tedickey|talk]]) 08:00, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
394186 +++$+++ Daven200520 +++$+++ Daven200520 +++$+++ 394185 +++$+++ 394185 +++$+++ 2010-08-02 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.280761800E09 +++$+++ Hello Tedickey! Welcome to Wikipedia! I apologize for overlooking that, however, next time be sure to clarify the '''exact''' reasoning behind your removal of content otherwise it can be seen as vandalism. Which is not tolerated. Thanks! -- +++$+++ :Hello Tedickey! Welcome to Wikipedia! I apologize for overlooking that, however, next time be sure to clarify the '''exact''' reasoning behind your removal of content otherwise it can be seen as vandalism. Which is not tolerated. Thanks! --[[User:Daven200520|Phoon]] ([[User talk:Daven200520#top|talk]]) 08:10, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
394187 +++$+++ Tedickey +++$+++ Daven200520 +++$+++ 394185 +++$+++ 394185 +++$+++ 2010-08-02 08:13:00 +++$+++ 1.280761980E09 +++$+++ my comment was \"remove redundant see-also\", which I thought was enough explanation, particularly with the frequency that I do that particular type of maintenance.  +++$+++ :my comment was "remove redundant see-also", which I thought was enough explanation, particularly with the frequency that I do that particular type of maintenance. [[User:Tedickey|TEDickey]] ([[User talk:Tedickey|talk]]) 08:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
394188 +++$+++ Daven200520 +++$+++ Daven200520 +++$+++ 394185 +++$+++ 394187 +++$+++ 2010-08-02 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.280762040E09 +++$+++ Well now you know otherwise! Have a good day! and again, welcome to Wikipedia. -- +++$+++ ::Well now you know otherwise! Have a good day! and again, welcome to Wikipedia. --[[User:Daven200520|Phoon]] ([[User talk:Daven200520#top|talk]]) 08:14, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

5816 +++$+++ 82.135.29.209 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5816 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-03 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.288792140E09 +++$+++ All in all, I suggest for the future that everyone leaves all this personal animosities behind and focus on improving Wikipedia articles and on a subject oriented discussion at the mediation. And note that a mediation is not about majority and voting; changing the list of participants of a mediation does not change the facts. Peace? [[Special:Contributions\/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ( +++$+++ All in all, I suggest for the future that everyone leaves all this personal animosities behind and focus on improving Wikipedia articles and on a subject oriented discussion at the mediation. And note that a mediation is not about majority and voting; changing the list of participants of a mediation does not change the facts. Peace? [[Special:Contributions/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ([[User talk:82.135.29.209|talk]]) 06:49, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
5817 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5816 +++$+++ 5816 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.288819680E09 +++$+++ Peace can only be given to those that extend their hand.  Stop extending your fist and you will recieve peace.   +++$+++ :Peace can only be given to those that extend their hand.  Stop extending your fist and you will recieve peace.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 14:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
5818 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5816 +++$+++ 5816 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.288827120E09 +++$+++ I see you are still [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABS24&action=historysubmit&diff=394547933&oldid=394523591 punching] BS24 in the face.  I bet you are a [[griefer]] as well.   +++$+++ :I see you are still [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABS24&action=historysubmit&diff=394547933&oldid=394523591 punching] BS24 in the face.  I bet you are a [[griefer]] as well.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 16:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
5819 +++$+++ AzureCitizen +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5816 +++$+++ 5818 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.288851420E09 +++$+++ Arzel, just a quick observation, did you see this edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation\/Restoring_Honor_rally&diff=prev&oldid=394550888 here]?  He removed the strike-out of BS24's opening statement on the grounds that it would be ad hominem to discount what he had to say just because he's blocked. [[WP:AGF|AGF]], or another punch in the face?  The edit was around 4:39 AM this morning.  Respect,  +++$+++ ::Arzel, just a quick observation, did you see this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/Restoring_Honor_rally&diff=prev&oldid=394550888 here]?  He removed the strike-out of BS24's opening statement on the grounds that it would be ad hominem to discount what he had to say just because he's blocked. [[WP:AGF|AGF]], or another punch in the face?  The edit was around 4:39 AM this morning.  Respect, [[User:AzureCitizen|AzureCitizen]] ([[User talk:AzureCitizen|talk]]) 23:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
5820 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5816 +++$+++ 5819 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.288852560E09 +++$+++ IP82 needs to build some more relationship [[chits]].  He is running a pretty high negative balance right now.   +++$+++ :::IP82 needs to build some more relationship [[chits]].  He is running a pretty high negative balance right now.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 23:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

530106 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530106 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-03 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.236079380E09 +++$+++ \u2190I'll do my best ;).  On the Richmond article, should I copy suggested changes to talk page, or just edit the article? \u2014  +++$+++ ←I'll do my best ;).  On the Richmond article, should I copy suggested changes to talk page, or just edit the article? — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 03:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
530107 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530106 +++$+++ 530106 +++$+++ 2009-03-03 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.236082620E09 +++$+++ Take a look, I did a couple edits, but I want to make sure that I'm headed in a direction you want to go before I go too much further. ;) \u2014  +++$+++ :Take a look, I did a couple edits, but I want to make sure that I'm headed in a direction you want to go before I go too much further. ;) — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 04:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

267964 +++$+++ Gawaxay +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267964 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-16 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.205708760E09 +++$+++ Your use of parentheses put the page in the article namespace. It needs to be in the User talk namespace. Thanks, <span id=\"Gawaxay\" class=\"plainlinks\" > +++$+++ Your use of parentheses put the page in the article namespace. It needs to be in the User talk namespace. Thanks, <span id="Gawaxay" class="plainlinks" >[[User:Gawaxay|Gawaxay]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gawaxay|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Gawaxay|contribs]] <small>•</small> [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username={{urlencode:Gawaxay}}&site={{SERVERNAME}} <span style="color:#002bb8">count</span>]</span>) 16:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
267965 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267964 +++$+++ 267964 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.205709420E09 +++$+++ That particular archive page has no parentheses in it. (At least, I cannot see them.) Now some other empty archive pages do, but they have never been tagged. Please point out the parentheses to me on the page you tagged, as I must be blind.  Regards,    +++$+++ :That particular archive page has no parentheses in it. (At least, I cannot see them.) Now some other empty archive pages do, but they have never been tagged. Please point out the parentheses to me on the page you tagged, as I must be blind.  Regards,   [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
267966 +++$+++ Gawaxay +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267964 +++$+++ 267965 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.205709540E09 +++$+++ I prodded [[(User talk:Mattisse\/Archive 16)]]. That's <u>'''('''<\/u>User talk:Mattisse\/Archive 16<u>''')'''<\/u>. --<span id=\"Gawaxay\" class=\"plainlinks\" > +++$+++ ::I prodded [[(User talk:Mattisse/Archive 16)]]. That's <u>'''('''</u>User talk:Mattisse/Archive 16<u>''')'''</u>. --<span id="Gawaxay" class="plainlinks" >[[User:Gawaxay|Gawaxay]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gawaxay|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Gawaxay|contribs]] <small>•</small> [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username={{urlencode:Gawaxay}}&site={{SERVERNAME}} <span style="color:#002bb8">count</span>]</span>) 16:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
267967 +++$+++ Gawaxay +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267964 +++$+++ 267966 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.205709720E09 +++$+++ [[Bracket#Parentheses ( )]]. ''Those'' parentheses. --<span id=\"Gawaxay\" class=\"plainlinks\" > +++$+++ :::[[Bracket#Parentheses ( )]]. ''Those'' parentheses. --<span id="Gawaxay" class="plainlinks" >[[User:Gawaxay|Gawaxay]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gawaxay|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Gawaxay|contribs]] <small>•</small> [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username={{urlencode:Gawaxay}}&site={{SERVERNAME}} <span style="color:#002bb8">count</span>]</span>) 16:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
267968 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267964 +++$+++ 267967 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.205709840E09 +++$+++ Do what you want.  +++$+++ ::::Do what you want. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

5821 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-04 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.288922820E09 +++$+++ You are very mistaken. SpecialK is the ONLY one I've accused of being a sock since the BS24 SPI.  +++$+++ You are very mistaken. SpecialK is the ONLY one I've accused of being a sock since the BS24 SPI. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 19:07, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
5822 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.288923300E09 +++$+++ I said you ''think'' everyone is a sock.  I didn't say that you have accused everyone, but it is really just semantics.  You might as well make your SPI case against SK, Xeno is probabably not going to take this action since it will look like a retribution attack against SK for the 3RR fracus between them.  Let me know when you are done being a complete JA regarding the whole BS24 situation.   +++$+++ :I said you ''think'' everyone is a sock.  I didn't say that you have accused everyone, but it is really just semantics.  You might as well make your SPI case against SK, Xeno is probabably not going to take this action since it will look like a retribution attack against SK for the 3RR fracus between them.  Let me know when you are done being a complete JA regarding the whole BS24 situation.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 19:15, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
5823 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ 5822 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.288925460E09 +++$+++ To paraphrase you: I didn't say it, but it's just semantics, so I did say it. What makes you think BS24, completely reversing compulsive tendencies, won't use socks again, if not already?  +++$+++ :: To paraphrase you: I didn't say it, but it's just semantics, so I did say it. What makes you think BS24, completely reversing compulsive tendencies, won't use socks again, if not already? [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 19:51, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
5824 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ 5823 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.288929720E09 +++$+++ Arzel, regarding the \"fracus between SpecialK and myself\", you should recall that during that short edit war, SpecialK exceeded 3RR while I did not, and then he made the mistake of reporting it, and he was blocked for it. No skin off my nose; there is nothing for which I should exact \"retribution\". You are correct, however, that I won't be participating in an SPI linking BS24 to SpecialK, but that's simply because I don't see any connection. Being a conservative, POV pusher in American politics, edit warrior and obnoxious, can describe many thousands of Wikipedia editors, and is not enough in common to warrant the accusation. I'm fairly certain SpecialK has other prior and present identities, and I've a good idea who two of them are -- but BS24 isn't one of them. I'm with Arzel in cautioning against a sock-hunt feeding frenzy, but much of what BS24 is dealing with now he brought upon himself.  +++$+++ :::Arzel, regarding the "fracus between SpecialK and myself", you should recall that during that short edit war, SpecialK exceeded 3RR while I did not, and then he made the mistake of reporting it, and he was blocked for it. No skin off my nose; there is nothing for which I should exact "retribution". You are correct, however, that I won't be participating in an SPI linking BS24 to SpecialK, but that's simply because I don't see any connection. Being a conservative, POV pusher in American politics, edit warrior and obnoxious, can describe many thousands of Wikipedia editors, and is not enough in common to warrant the accusation. I'm fairly certain SpecialK has other prior and present identities, and I've a good idea who two of them are -- but BS24 isn't one of them. I'm with Arzel in cautioning against a sock-hunt feeding frenzy, but much of what BS24 is dealing with now he brought upon himself. [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 21:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
5825 +++$+++ Akerans +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ 5824 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.288929000E09 +++$+++ Let's see. A 3 year editing history of not socking, followed by a month (give or take) of socking, followed by 9 months of not socking. Plus, the fact no one has been able to demonstrate s\/he's socked in that 9 months. Somewhere someone has mentioned some IP address, but I chalk that up to forgetting to log-in. Something of which you're guilty (you've edited from a number of IPs yourself), so you can't fault him\/her for that.<p>Speaking of which, how about the fact you included one of your IP edits in your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/NYyankees51&diff=prev&oldid=391011343 initial SPI report] against BS24, and then claimed it was made by BS24! If anyone is guilty of recent socking, it's you. And, you didn't even own up to that fact. All you did was say [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/NYyankees51&diff=prev&oldid=391081459 you shouldn't address comments to other editors]. So, I have a lot more faith in BS24's desire to be a positive contributor to the project than than stuff you've shown in the past few weeks. Giving your lack of civility to a number of administrators of late, I'm surprised you haven't been blocked yet for your disruptive attitude. You've clearly demonstrated to me that you're no longer here to contribute positive to the project, and are only seeking to stir up trouble where ever you go.  +++$+++ ::::Let's see. A 3 year editing history of not socking, followed by a month (give or take) of socking, followed by 9 months of not socking. Plus, the fact no one has been able to demonstrate s/he's socked in that 9 months. Somewhere someone has mentioned some IP address, but I chalk that up to forgetting to log-in. Something of which you're guilty (you've edited from a number of IPs yourself), so you can't fault him/her for that.<p>Speaking of which, how about the fact you included one of your IP edits in your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/NYyankees51&diff=prev&oldid=391011343 initial SPI report] against BS24, and then claimed it was made by BS24! If anyone is guilty of recent socking, it's you. And, you didn't even own up to that fact. All you did was say [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/NYyankees51&diff=prev&oldid=391081459 you shouldn't address comments to other editors]. So, I have a lot more faith in BS24's desire to be a positive contributor to the project than than stuff you've shown in the past few weeks. Giving your lack of civility to a number of administrators of late, I'm surprised you haven't been blocked yet for your disruptive attitude. You've clearly demonstrated to me that you're no longer here to contribute positive to the project, and are only seeking to stir up trouble where ever you go. [[User:Akerans|Akerans]] ([[User talk:Akerans|talk]]) 20:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
5826 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.288937700E09 +++$+++ Akerans' definition of a sock and [[WP:SOC| Wikipedia's]], which requires deception, are in conflict. I signed a lot of my post Mr Anon, so they would be traced back to me, not to maliciously evade scrutiny. (Could you think of a worse way to go on the Wiki lam?[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Alcoholics_Anonymous&diff=prev&oldid=352852704]) I now log on because the opposite suspicion happened, obvioulsy.  Opening new accounts while on indefinite block, as NYyankees51 did again and again and again, may win your admiration, but if that's what it takes to get it, I'll pass. Only in your mind am I \"guilty of recent socking,\" and you and others can stay so convinced without my taking offense. This posting is more for others to see and to clear the record. Finally, it's false to say that I have not been mute on the matter.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/The_Artist_AKA_Mr_Anonymous\/Archive]. I hope you simply misspoke because you did not check my SPI, and are not revealing a sense of entitlement larger than the that which SPI admins can rightfully enjoy.   +++$+++ :::::: Akerans' definition of a sock and [[WP:SOC| Wikipedia's]], which requires deception, are in conflict. I signed a lot of my post Mr Anon, so they would be traced back to me, not to maliciously evade scrutiny. (Could you think of a worse way to go on the Wiki lam?[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alcoholics_Anonymous&diff=prev&oldid=352852704]) I now log on because the opposite suspicion happened, obvioulsy.  Opening new accounts while on indefinite block, as NYyankees51 did again and again and again, may win your admiration, but if that's what it takes to get it, I'll pass. Only in your mind am I "guilty of recent socking," and you and others can stay so convinced without my taking offense. This posting is more for others to see and to clear the record. Finally, it's false to say that I have not been mute on the matter.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/The_Artist_AKA_Mr_Anonymous/Archive]. I hope you simply misspoke because you did not check my SPI, and are not revealing a sense of entitlement larger than the that which SPI admins can rightfully enjoy.  [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 23:15, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
5827 +++$+++ Akerans +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.288944660E09 +++$+++ If you knew you signed your IP edits as Mr Anon, then why did you claim that was BS24's edit in the first place? That's a clear case of an attempt on your part to [[WP:ILLEGIT|mislead, deceive, and\/or disrupt]]. And a previous SPI against you doesn't excuse you for making such deceptive claims against other users.  +++$+++ :::::::: If you knew you signed your IP edits as Mr Anon, then why did you claim that was BS24's edit in the first place? That's a clear case of an attempt on your part to [[WP:ILLEGIT|mislead, deceive, and/or disrupt]]. And a previous SPI against you doesn't excuse you for making such deceptive claims against other users. [[User:Akerans|Akerans]] ([[User talk:Akerans|talk]]) 01:11, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
5828 +++$+++ Akerans +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.288993980E09 +++$+++ No, that wasn't you owning up to the fact that you tried to pass off one of your edit summaries as someone else. That was you admitting to the edit summary. Do you not understand the difference? Based on your recent post, appears as though you're chalking it up as a mistake. However, as an editor who tends accuse others of \"reading less\", I have to wonder how you missed \"Mr Anon\" in the edit summary, twice no less. Perhaps you can start holding yourself to the same kind of standard you expect of everyone else?  +++$+++ ::::::::::No, that wasn't you owning up to the fact that you tried to pass off one of your edit summaries as someone else. That was you admitting to the edit summary. Do you not understand the difference? Based on your recent post, appears as though you're chalking it up as a mistake. However, as an editor who tends accuse others of "reading less", I have to wonder how you missed "Mr Anon" in the edit summary, twice no less. Perhaps you can start holding yourself to the same kind of standard you expect of everyone else? [[User:Akerans|Akerans]] ([[User talk:Akerans|talk]]) 14:53, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
5829 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.288996200E09 +++$+++ You really don't have to think it was just an accidental mistake.   +++$+++ :::::::::::: You really don't have to think it was just an accidental mistake.  [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 15:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
5830 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.288938360E09 +++$+++ BTW, you did not quote my initial report, you quoted a follow up, though it was easy to see as such since I headed it \"''(Additional evidence in response to BS24's statement.)''\". I'm seeing a pattern of sloppiness, which though undoubtly based on good faith, makes me need to check your citations in order to consider them carefully. A little onerous, but, oh well. +++$+++ ::::::: BTW, you did not quote my initial report, you quoted a follow up, though it was easy to see as such since I headed it "''(Additional evidence in response to BS24's statement.)''". I'm seeing a pattern of sloppiness, which though undoubtly based on good faith, makes me need to check your citations in order to consider them carefully. A little onerous, but, oh well.[[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 23:26, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
5831 +++$+++ Akerans +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.288944660E09 +++$+++ Regardless of my label, that's the correct diff of you making the deceptive claim. So, knowing that was your edit, why did you say the edit belonged to someone else? Two of them no less! You included two edits signed with Mr Anon and claimed they were BS24?! You tell us that you knew they were yours, and you did it anyway? And you don't see the deception on your part?  +++$+++ ::::::::Regardless of my label, that's the correct diff of you making the deceptive claim. So, knowing that was your edit, why did you say the edit belonged to someone else? Two of them no less! You included two edits signed with Mr Anon and claimed they were BS24?! You tell us that you knew they were yours, and you did it anyway? And you don't see the deception on your part? [[User:Akerans|Akerans]] ([[User talk:Akerans|talk]]) 01:11, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
5832 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ 5822 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.288951320E09 +++$+++ Hello, lo, lo, lo. AK in the echo chamber, y'all. Easy now.  +++$+++ :: Hello, lo, lo, lo. AK in the echo chamber, y'all. Easy now. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 03:02, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
5833 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5821 +++$+++ 5832 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.289096580E09 +++$+++ Ahhh, hear that? Crickets.  +++$+++ ::: Ahhh, hear that? Crickets. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 19:23, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

568949 +++$+++ Ju66l3r +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-16 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.161051420E09 +++$+++ Hello, I mean no ill will to you.  I appreciate the times that I've worked with you in the past.  I do however disagree with a recent AfD decision you made in regards to an article that I submitted for review.  The AfD is located at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Alix Rosenthal]].  The deletion review is located at [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FAlix_Rosenthal_Review]] and your reasons on why you chose '''no consensus''' will be greatly appreciated in the review.  Thanks.  +++$+++ Hello, I mean no ill will to you.  I appreciate the times that I've worked with you in the past.  I do however disagree with a recent AfD decision you made in regards to an article that I submitted for review.  The AfD is located at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alix Rosenthal]].  The deletion review is located at [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FAlix_Rosenthal_Review]] and your reasons on why you chose '''no consensus''' will be greatly appreciated in the review.  Thanks. [[User:Ju66l3r|ju66l3r]] 19:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
568950 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568949 +++$+++ 568949 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.161060600E09 +++$+++ Hello and good evening! I don't take your request for review as a negative thing at all, don't worry! [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review\/Log\/2006_October_16&oldid=81867994 I have contributed] to the review, as you have requested. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello and good evening! I don't take your request for review as a negative thing at all, don't worry! [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_October_16&oldid=81867994 I have contributed] to the review, as you have requested. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:50, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
568951 +++$+++ Ju66l3r +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568949 +++$+++ 568950 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.161062520E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I appreciate the comments.  I can see how you came to your decision.  I'll wait to see what an outside voice might have to say upon review just for completeness.  If there are no timely comments then I'll just repeal the review and resubmit the AfD per your suggestion.  One result of the original AfD was a creation of the relevant election's article (which should encompass the purposes of the Rosenthal article without needing the candidate article, thus avoiding any WP:BIO concerns) and so that could be taken into consideration on a new AfD.   +++$+++ ::Thanks.  I appreciate the comments.  I can see how you came to your decision.  I'll wait to see what an outside voice might have to say upon review just for completeness.  If there are no timely comments then I'll just repeal the review and resubmit the AfD per your suggestion.  One result of the original AfD was a creation of the relevant election's article (which should encompass the purposes of the Rosenthal article without needing the candidate article, thus avoiding any WP:BIO concerns) and so that could be taken into consideration on a new AfD.  [[User:Ju66l3r|ju66l3r]] 22:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

267969 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-19 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.205910660E09 +++$+++ I realize we had a \"trist\" but am glad to see us working well together at present. It's my hope the harmonious partnership will continue. I do have a request - which you can feel free to deny if you desire. I was wondering if you could create an additional blank spin off list entitled \"Additional materials on Che Guevara\" for me, so that I can place the materials formerly listed in the article there? Thanks. +++$+++ I realize we had a "trist" but am glad to see us working well together at present. It's my hope the harmonious partnership will continue. I do have a request - which you can feel free to deny if you desire. I was wondering if you could create an additional blank spin off list entitled "Additional materials on Che Guevara" for me, so that I can place the materials formerly listed in the article there? Thanks.[[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 00:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
267970 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267969 +++$+++ 267969 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.205912040E09 +++$+++ Did you read the last comment on [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Che Guevara]]? I intent to follow his recommendations. He know what he is talking about. We are lucky that someone even bothered to comment at this point. Also, I would like to remove the cnotes, although I know [[User:Polaris999]] will not like that. Maybe there is another way of writing an article on Che where they can be used. But I would like to see this article remain a Feature Article and it will not with those notes. Everyone (the Feature Article editors) have run out of patience with this article.   +++$+++ :Did you read the last comment on [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Che Guevara]]? I intent to follow his recommendations. He know what he is talking about. We are lucky that someone even bothered to comment at this point. Also, I would like to remove the cnotes, although I know [[User:Polaris999]] will not like that. Maybe there is another way of writing an article on Che where they can be used. But I would like to see this article remain a Feature Article and it will not with those notes. Everyone (the Feature Article editors) have run out of patience with this article.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
267971 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267969 +++$+++ 267970 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.205953440E09 +++$+++ I agree with most of the changes you have made thus far. and have a few requests. Can you change the name of the list article of CG's works to \"Books by Che Guevara\" - I feel that would be more precise and accurate. On that article itself I can then specify that these are (English translations only). Also I have restored the external links for the time being until some more people give their input. I am not against moving them to a list (Especially the archival footage to it's own seperate list) but I do think that the other media links are worthy of staying (but am open to your reasoning why they would not be). In addition I put the wording in the first few sentences back to the earlier wording as the changes I felt were poorly constructed. Overall however I appreciate your efforts thus far and wish to remain collaborative on the changes.  +++$+++ ::I agree with most of the changes you have made thus far. and have a few requests. Can you change the name of the list article of CG's works to "Books by Che Guevara" - I feel that would be more precise and accurate. On that article itself I can then specify that these are (English translations only). Also I have restored the external links for the time being until some more people give their input. I am not against moving them to a list (Especially the archival footage to it's own seperate list) but I do think that the other media links are worthy of staying (but am open to your reasoning why they would not be). In addition I put the wording in the first few sentences back to the earlier wording as the changes I felt were poorly constructed. Overall however I appreciate your efforts thus far and wish to remain collaborative on the changes. [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 12:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
267972 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267969 +++$+++ 267971 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.205962680E09 +++$+++ Matisse, what is with the aggressive response? I am confused. Whan I change something you refer to it as \"reverting\" you, but when you change something I previously wrote it is seen as legitimate. I mentioned on the talk page my changes and am open for discussion on them. Please point out to me what you believe is POV as I am open to changing it. It is not a 3 RR violation to continue to improve the article as we both have been doing. My piece was written last night and this morning before your recent edits and thus were not an attempt to alter your recent edits. Let's please discuss this on the CG Talk Page. ;o)  +++$+++ :::Matisse, what is with the aggressive response? I am confused. Whan I change something you refer to it as "reverting" you, but when you change something I previously wrote it is seen as legitimate. I mentioned on the talk page my changes and am open for discussion on them. Please point out to me what you believe is POV as I am open to changing it. It is not a 3 RR violation to continue to improve the article as we both have been doing. My piece was written last night and this morning before your recent edits and thus were not an attempt to alter your recent edits. Let's please discuss this on the CG Talk Page. ;o) [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 14:38, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
267973 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267969 +++$+++ 267972 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.205963520E09 +++$+++ I had noticed than no one was working on the article. You have not been working on improving it. You made one edit on March 7 and one on March 6 with none since then. A respected editor left suggestions on the article FAR suggestion page. Since no one appeared to be addressing those issues I decided to work on the article on March 18. Then, without warning, you started to revert my edits without any discussion. Further, you are adding POV and over linking. You are not addressing the fundamental issues of the article that need work. Again I recommend you read 3RR rules. Any edit you make if another editors work, is a revert.  +++$+++ ::::I had noticed than no one was working on the article. You have not been working on improving it. You made one edit on March 7 and one on March 6 with none since then. A respected editor left suggestions on the article FAR suggestion page. Since no one appeared to be addressing those issues I decided to work on the article on March 18. Then, without warning, you started to revert my edits without any discussion. Further, you are adding POV and over linking. You are not addressing the fundamental issues of the article that need work. Again I recommend you read 3RR rules. Any edit you make if another editors work, is a revert. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
267974 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267969 +++$+++ 267973 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.205963880E09 +++$+++ I had stopped editing it because I thought that in its current state it was going to be judged for FA status. I believed that everyone was sort of letting it remain as is. As I noticed that someone else was interested in continuing improvements, I then rejoined back in, under the hopes of working with you. A few issues: how are 2 links substantially more than 1 in the lead ? Most leads have 5+ from what I have seen. Also wouldn't any edit you do also be a revert, as you are altering changes I have personally made many times. The 3 RR rules refers to just hitting UNDO on your work and erasing it all. That is not what I have done. I am continuing to better the wording just as you are. You have removed countless sentences that were at one time added by another editor ... however this is not reverting ? But when I change a few sentences for wording - all of the sudden I have committed a cardinal sin ? I don't get it. Also what is POV in the lead ? I am open to correcting it, but you have given me 0 specifics. +++$+++ :::::I had stopped editing it because I thought that in its current state it was going to be judged for FA status. I believed that everyone was sort of letting it remain as is. As I noticed that someone else was interested in continuing improvements, I then rejoined back in, under the hopes of working with you. A few issues: how are 2 links substantially more than 1 in the lead ? Most leads have 5+ from what I have seen. Also wouldn't any edit you do also be a revert, as you are altering changes I have personally made many times. The 3 RR rules refers to just hitting UNDO on your work and erasing it all. That is not what I have done. I am continuing to better the wording just as you are. You have removed countless sentences that were at one time added by another editor ... however this is not reverting ? But when I change a few sentences for wording - all of the sudden I have committed a cardinal sin ? I don't get it. Also what is POV in the lead ? I am open to correcting it, but you have given me 0 specifics.[[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 14:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

530115 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530115 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-04 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.236207120E09 +++$+++ \u2190Thank you very much Royal - I was trying to read through the userpage stuff re\/vandalism - didn't want to bump up against a COI issue - I was checking to see if I could find a procedure to run the 2-4 warning templates on him for article-space, and such.  I've dumped vandals at AIV before, but only in the strict format that's there: violate after 4th warning, vandal after return from block, violate NPA stuff.  I even (lulz) looked to see if you were editing at the moment, to contact you personally - and then fired up my mIRC looking for admin\/experienced user advice.  I didn't want to just hit the sack, and turn him lose in mainspace - was feeling too old, too slow, and not up to speed on proper procedure LOL.  Not the first time I got hit with vandal crap, but first time I ran across anything more than a hit and run, drive-by.  Next time I'll know that I can just leave a line at AIV, and it'll be taken care of.  Thanks again =D .. \u2014  +++$+++ ←Thank you very much Royal - I was trying to read through the userpage stuff re/vandalism - didn't want to bump up against a COI issue - I was checking to see if I could find a procedure to run the 2-4 warning templates on him for article-space, and such.  I've dumped vandals at AIV before, but only in the strict format that's there: violate after 4th warning, vandal after return from block, violate NPA stuff.  I even (lulz) looked to see if you were editing at the moment, to contact you personally - and then fired up my mIRC looking for admin/experienced user advice.  I didn't want to just hit the sack, and turn him lose in mainspace - was feeling too old, too slow, and not up to speed on proper procedure LOL.  Not the first time I got hit with vandal crap, but first time I ran across anything more than a hit and run, drive-by.  Next time I'll know that I can just leave a line at AIV, and it'll be taken care of.  Thanks again =D .. — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 14:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
530116 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530115 +++$+++ 530115 +++$+++ 2009-03-04 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.236212760E09 +++$+++ I expanded a little on the 1986 season. \u2014  +++$+++ :I expanded a little on the 1986 season. — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 16:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

445375 +++$+++ Fritzpoll +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-16 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.216262940E09 +++$+++ What perfect timing for my return to find that you've finally taken the plunge.  Whilst I was away, I did use my mobile to leave a message sending my congratulations on the new addition - got lost on my talk page!  Anyway, best of luck in both endeavours - let me know which you find more stressful ;)   +++$+++ What perfect timing for my return to find that you've finally taken the plunge.  Whilst I was away, I did use my mobile to leave a message sending my congratulations on the new addition - got lost on my talk page!  Anyway, best of luck in both endeavours - let me know which you find more stressful ;)  [[User:Fritzpoll|Fritzpoll]] ([[User talk:Fritzpoll|talk]]) 19:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
445376 +++$+++ Fritzpoll +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445375 +++$+++ 445375 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.216282260E09 +++$+++ Added the banner for you  +++$+++ :Added the banner for you [[User:Fritzpoll|Fritzpoll]] ([[User talk:Fritzpoll|talk]]) 01:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
445377 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445375 +++$+++ 445376 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.216282740E09 +++$+++ Thanks Fritz, and for the kindly worded support on the RfA. Baby Gwynand is doing well!  +++$+++ ::Thanks Fritz, and for the kindly worded support on the RfA. Baby Gwynand is doing well! [[User:Gwynand|Gwynand]] | [[User_talk:Gwynand|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Gwynand|Contribs]] 01:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

530118 +++$+++ Sift&Winnow +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-05 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.236322680E09 +++$+++ Or what?  --'''<font color=\"#DAA520\"> +++$+++ Or what?  --'''<font color="#DAA520">[[User:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Sift]]</font><small>&amp;</small><font color="#A0522D">[[User talk:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Winnow]]</font>''' 22:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
530119 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530118 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.236329820E09 +++$+++ Everyone needs to understand, so I'll explain in long form for you to help me clean up the working. He raced in 5 races that season. Of those 5 races, his car was functioning correctly at the end of 3 of these 5 races. The other 2 were DNFs (Did Not Finishes), which is a bad result. These 3 races all ended with his car finishing in 12th place. His best finish that season was those 3 12th place finishes. This is what I'm trying to say in one sentence. It's not very important and could be deleted if it's too hard to find wording that is not awkward. Thank you so much for your review! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Everyone needs to understand, so I'll explain in long form for you to help me clean up the working. He raced in 5 races that season. Of those 5 races, his car was functioning correctly at the end of 3 of these 5 races. The other 2 were DNFs (Did Not Finishes), which is a bad result. These 3 races all ended with his car finishing in 12th place. His best finish that season was those 3 12th place finishes. This is what I'm trying to say in one sentence. It's not very important and could be deleted if it's too hard to find wording that is not awkward. Thank you so much for your review! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
530120 +++$+++ Sift&Winnow +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530118 +++$+++ 530118 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.236339840E09 +++$+++ That season he competed in five events, with two DNFs (did not finish) and three 12th place finishes. Overall he ended up 41st in season points.  --'''<font color=\"#DAA520\"> +++$+++ :That season he competed in five events, with two DNFs (did not finish) and three 12th place finishes. Overall he ended up 41st in season points.  --'''<font color="#DAA520">[[User:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Sift]]</font><small>&amp;</small><font color="#A0522D">[[User talk:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Winnow]]</font>''' 03:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
530121 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530118 +++$+++ 530120 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.236340260E09 +++$+++ (ec) It was definitely too much, I gave the long explanation so that you'd understand. I see you now understand. I used your wording, changing it to reflect that he finished 41st in season points. One more editor who understands NASCAR is peer reviewing it and then I plan to propose it for Good Article. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::(ec) It was definitely too much, I gave the long explanation so that you'd understand. I see you now understand. I used your wording, changing it to reflect that he finished 41st in season points. One more editor who understands NASCAR is peer reviewing it and then I plan to propose it for Good Article. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:51, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
530122 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530118 +++$+++ 530121 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.236384780E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil.  Sorry I've been scarce the last day or so - health issues flared up again.  For the most part it looks good, I think.  The only 2 things I see that I might change are: 1.) In the illness section, the second half of the first paragraph probably belongs up in the NASCAR section (it covers more of the race information that his actual illness.)  2.) And this one I'm not sure about - Richmond acquired a lot of awards throughout his life, and they are mentioned through the course of the article. I don't know if a list of those awards by year in the \"Legacy\" section would be considered redundant, or good summation.  For the most part though, I think the article is good - and I don't know as maybe anything else I might try to change would do more harm than good.  If I'm feeling better shortly, I'll double-check again though. \u2014  +++$+++ :::Hi Royalbroil.  Sorry I've been scarce the last day or so - health issues flared up again.  For the most part it looks good, I think.  The only 2 things I see that I might change are: 1.) In the illness section, the second half of the first paragraph probably belongs up in the NASCAR section (it covers more of the race information that his actual illness.)  2.) And this one I'm not sure about - Richmond acquired a lot of awards throughout his life, and they are mentioned through the course of the article. I don't know if a list of those awards by year in the "Legacy" section would be considered redundant, or good summation.  For the most part though, I think the article is good - and I don't know as maybe anything else I might try to change would do more harm than good.  If I'm feeling better shortly, I'll double-check again though. — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup> 16:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
530123 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530118 +++$+++ 530122 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.236432000E09 +++$+++ 1) I did more rearranging. I like chronological order because things get disjointed, so I reverted the integrated text and changed the headings\/rearranged. 2) Sounds redundant and unneeded. The very best items go in the NASCAR infobox, which has already happened. I'm going to nominate the article for [[WP:GA]]. You can edit it after it's nominated. I expect it to take about 2 weeks before it gets reviewed. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::1) I did more rearranging. I like chronological order because things get disjointed, so I reverted the integrated text and changed the headings/rearranged. 2) Sounds redundant and unneeded. The very best items go in the NASCAR infobox, which has already happened. I'm going to nominate the article for [[WP:GA]]. You can edit it after it's nominated. I expect it to take about 2 weeks before it gets reviewed. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

267975 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267975 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-19 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.205965200E09 +++$+++ Polaris999 and I were unwilling to edit the page as long as the quality of the  editing was continuing in the same vein as it was when we both dropped out. After we dropped out the article continued to go downhill. Yesterday I noticed that no one had made more that a few edits since March 5.  When no one is editing the article and there are no comments on the FAR comment page, that means the article will fail. Since the article was obviously going to fail, and since you have not contributed anything geared to prevent its failing, I decided to heed [[User:Marskell]] suggestions and fix his complaints. (As noted elsewhere you have not been editing, except for two or three, since March 5 anyway. I had no idea you would suddenly step in and revert me, nor that you would start working on the article when I was -- not wise as it causes edit conflicts and loss of material unless coordinated, besides being rude and risking breaking the 3RR.  We are lucky enough that anyone is bothering to review the article at this point. Everyone is sick of it.  To continue to screw it up now will be fatal. We may not be able to fix it anyway, but if we edit constructively, at least we can try. If you want to edit, please focus on the problems as delineated by FAR responses.  +++$+++ Polaris999 and I were unwilling to edit the page as long as the quality of the  editing was continuing in the same vein as it was when we both dropped out. After we dropped out the article continued to go downhill. Yesterday I noticed that no one had made more that a few edits since March 5.  When no one is editing the article and there are no comments on the FAR comment page, that means the article will fail. Since the article was obviously going to fail, and since you have not contributed anything geared to prevent its failing, I decided to heed [[User:Marskell]] suggestions and fix his complaints. (As noted elsewhere you have not been editing, except for two or three, since March 5 anyway. I had no idea you would suddenly step in and revert me, nor that you would start working on the article when I was -- not wise as it causes edit conflicts and loss of material unless coordinated, besides being rude and risking breaking the 3RR.  We are lucky enough that anyone is bothering to review the article at this point. Everyone is sick of it.  To continue to screw it up now will be fatal. We may not be able to fix it anyway, but if we edit constructively, at least we can try. If you want to edit, please focus on the problems as delineated by FAR responses. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
267976 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267975 +++$+++ 267975 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.205965380E09 +++$+++ Linking two words in a row is to be avoided if possible. A \"sea of blue\" is to be avoided. Common English words such as \"author\" should not be linked.   +++$+++ :Linking two words in a row is to be avoided if possible. A "sea of blue" is to be avoided. Common English words such as "author" should not be linked.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
267977 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267975 +++$+++ 267976 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.205976720E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the specific suggestions and believe I corrected the author issue by linking to the list of his books. As for the two words in a row, that is common throughout the article, which specific links (for example) do you believe should not be linked in sequence?  +++$+++ ::I appreciate the specific suggestions and believe I corrected the author issue by linking to the list of his books. As for the two words in a row, that is common throughout the article, which specific links (for example) do you believe should not be linked in sequence? [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 18:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

263116 +++$+++ Argos42 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-25 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.253916060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Argos42|Argos42]] ([[User talk:Argos42|talk]]) 15:01, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
263117 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263116 +++$+++ 263116 +++$+++ 2009-09-25 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.253921940E09 +++$+++ The word you are looking for is \"duplicate\", not \"double\". If you had used the correct word, or a sentence, in your edit summary, I might have understood.  +++$+++ :The word you are looking for is "duplicate", not "double". If you had used the correct word, or a sentence, in your edit summary, I might have understood. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
263118 +++$+++ Argos42 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263116 +++$+++ 263117 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.254005160E09 +++$+++ In typography, \"a double\" (or \"a doublet\", I think, in the US) means that a sentence or a word has been printed twice. Nevermind, reverting discourage users from participating, maybe you should read [[WP:RV]].  +++$+++ ::In typography, "a double" (or "a doublet", I think, in the US) means that a sentence or a word has been printed twice. Nevermind, reverting discourage users from participating, maybe you should read [[WP:RV]]. [[User:Argos42|Argos42]] ([[User talk:Argos42|talk]]) 15:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
263119 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263116 +++$+++ 263118 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.254024420E09 +++$+++ [[WP:RV]] says \"Revert vandalism on sight\". I thought (wrongly, I accept) your edit was vandalism. Your username was a redlink. The edit summary said only \"double\". I am unable to find your interpretation of that word in any dictionary (I do find \"doublet\" has that meaning). Even if \"double\" is used for that meaning in some parts of the world, I'm puzzled why you are hassling me for not understanding a term that isn't in my dictionary. This was just an honest mistake; no lecture required.  +++$+++ :::[[WP:RV]] says "Revert vandalism on sight". I thought (wrongly, I accept) your edit was vandalism. Your username was a redlink. The edit summary said only "double". I am unable to find your interpretation of that word in any dictionary (I do find "doublet" has that meaning). Even if "double" is used for that meaning in some parts of the world, I'm puzzled why you are hassling me for not understanding a term that isn't in my dictionary. This was just an honest mistake; no lecture required. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:07, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
263120 +++$+++ Argos42 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263116 +++$+++ 263119 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.254066540E09 +++$+++ I was just asking you to \"pay attention\", nothing else. Nevermind, ...  +++$+++ ::::I was just asking you to "pay attention", nothing else. Nevermind, ... [[User:Argos42|Argos42]] ([[User talk:Argos42|talk]]) 08:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

5834 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5834 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-04 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.288929720E09 +++$+++ 3 year editing history of not being caught socking, followed by two months of socking and vandalism, followed by 9 months of editing on a sock. Plus, he has edited from IPs extensively, claiming, for instance, that 50+ edits across several articles over  just a couple days was simply \"forgetting to log in\". Since being recently confronted, his biggest problem has been his lying -- not a good trait for someone wanting to turn over a new leaf.   +++$+++ 3 year editing history of not being caught socking, followed by two months of socking and vandalism, followed by 9 months of editing on a sock. Plus, he has edited from IPs extensively, claiming, for instance, that 50+ edits across several articles over  just a couple days was simply "forgetting to log in". Since being recently confronted, his biggest problem has been his lying -- not a good trait for someone wanting to turn over a new leaf.  [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 21:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
5835 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5834 +++$+++ 5834 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.288937700E09 +++$+++ Point of fact: NYyankees51 admittedly spent 11 (2+9) months as a sock of NYyankees51, as best we know. A sum likely to swell, no doubt, and unfortunately. As for SpecialK, Xeno probably has a better read on that editor, and unless I find more to pursue it, I'm letting it slide for now, even though I still strongly suspect him as a sock of NYyankees51.  +++$+++ : Point of fact: NYyankees51 admittedly spent 11 (2+9) months as a sock of NYyankees51, as best we know. A sum likely to swell, no doubt, and unfortunately. As for SpecialK, Xeno probably has a better read on that editor, and unless I find more to pursue it, I'm letting it slide for now, even though I still strongly suspect him as a sock of NYyankees51. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 23:15, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

267979 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-19 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.205958780E09 +++$+++ I notice some POV has crept in overnight. Please go in the direction of removing POV. Also, do nothing that will make the article longer. Remove rather than add. Also, much of the article does not make sense. I am tempted to retrieve an earlier version for some sections.  +++$+++ I notice some POV has crept in overnight. Please go in the direction of removing POV. Also, do nothing that will make the article longer. Remove rather than add. Also, much of the article does not make sense. I am tempted to retrieve an earlier version for some sections. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
267980 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267979 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.205990160E09 +++$+++ I do not want an edit-war with you. Why won't you bring up your concerns in the lead to me so I can address your concerns and fix them, or give me a chance to explain my rationale for their inclusion. Actually you editing the lead would be the 3rd revert by you as well ... as it would be if I edited it, so that is an irrelevant point. Hell we have each edited wiring by each other countless times and that is not my concern. I want to be collaborative with you on this, but you are making things difficult with an overly aggressive tone and threats which are unnecessary. Wikipedia belongs to all of us, let's figure out a way to ensure everyone is able to use it how it was intended.  +++$+++ :::I do not want an edit-war with you. Why won't you bring up your concerns in the lead to me so I can address your concerns and fix them, or give me a chance to explain my rationale for their inclusion. Actually you editing the lead would be the 3rd revert by you as well ... as it would be if I edited it, so that is an irrelevant point. Hell we have each edited wiring by each other countless times and that is not my concern. I want to be collaborative with you on this, but you are making things difficult with an overly aggressive tone and threats which are unnecessary. Wikipedia belongs to all of us, let's figure out a way to ensure everyone is able to use it how it was intended. [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 22:16, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

5836 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5836 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-06 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.289033520E09 +++$+++ Not only was your statement [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_NYyankees51 incorrect] and a distinction without a difference, NYyankees51 could not stop lying. The admin who rejected his third all but proved this. BTW, scolding that admin won't help BS24, quiet the opposite.  +++$+++ Not only was your statement [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_NYyankees51 incorrect] and a distinction without a difference, NYyankees51 could not stop lying. The admin who rejected his third all but proved this. BTW, scolding that admin won't help BS24, quiet the opposite. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 01:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5837 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5836 +++$+++ 5836 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.289070540E09 +++$+++ That Admin didn't prove anything, and neither have you, other than that you are vindictive.   +++$+++ :That Admin didn't prove anything, and neither have you, other than that you are vindictive.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 12:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5838 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5836 +++$+++ 5837 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.289083200E09 +++$+++ Nah. Funny how you never acknowledge a mistake, or only read half of a short sentence.  +++$+++ :: Nah. Funny how you never acknowledge a mistake, or only read half of a short sentence. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 15:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

267982 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-20 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.205999880E09 +++$+++ [[User:Redthoreau]] has virtually taken over the [[Che Guevara]] article. He templated me with a personal attack because I have said several times that I would not edit the article anymore and gave him some 3RR warnings. I have tried to report him to 3RR (after putting up with this for a long time -- all the other editors have been driven away. Thanks if you can help! Sincerely,   +++$+++ [[User:Redthoreau]] has virtually taken over the [[Che Guevara]] article. He templated me with a personal attack because I have said several times that I would not edit the article anymore and gave him some 3RR warnings. I have tried to report him to 3RR (after putting up with this for a long time -- all the other editors have been driven away. Thanks if you can help! Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
267983 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267982 +++$+++ 267982 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.206002280E09 +++$+++ I see that you are accusing each other but still working in good faith. My suggestion is that you both smile (as you are edit warring about something  a bit [[WP:LAME|lame]] to me) or get a day or 2 as a break from the article or simply forget about accusations and discuss, because sincerely this is not something complicated. I trust you can do that. If that fails, let me know again. I also see Blnguyen helping out there. Please concentrate on collaboration and suggest you discuss your edits before hitting the 'save' button. --  +++$+++ :I see that you are accusing each other but still working in good faith. My suggestion is that you both smile (as you are edit warring about something  a bit [[WP:LAME|lame]] to me) or get a day or 2 as a break from the article or simply forget about accusations and discuss, because sincerely this is not something complicated. I trust you can do that. If that fails, let me know again. I also see Blnguyen helping out there. Please concentrate on collaboration and suggest you discuss your edits before hitting the 'save' button. -- [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up''® </sup></font>]]</small> 01:38, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
267984 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267982 +++$+++ 267983 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.206003840E09 +++$+++ correction ... '''I templated you after you falsely templated me'''. You are the one that drove everyone away, not me. You are the one that continues to hypocritically harass my talk page and then when I respond with the exact same behavior you freak out and attempt to run to moderators for cover. You continually tell me to stop contacting you, and yet contact me and ask others to also do so. I have continually requested you to work collaboratively and yet you refuse every time ... telling me to \"grow up\" and refusing to be specific with your suggestions remarking that I am a \"grown up\" whose hand you will not hold. Although yes to cover yourself you did post some specifics on your 4th \"I am leaving for good\" declaration today. You are disrespectful, and impossible to deal with politely, even though I always do. The only reason I am responding here is because you always run to others and misrepresent the situation in an attempt to create a fictitious account of what happens. Your misrepresentation or reality is truly astounding and leads me to question your overall honesty. Please stop referencing me and I will finally be able to stop spending time defending myself against your made up accusations.  +++$+++ ::correction ... '''I templated you after you falsely templated me'''. You are the one that drove everyone away, not me. You are the one that continues to hypocritically harass my talk page and then when I respond with the exact same behavior you freak out and attempt to run to moderators for cover. You continually tell me to stop contacting you, and yet contact me and ask others to also do so. I have continually requested you to work collaboratively and yet you refuse every time ... telling me to "grow up" and refusing to be specific with your suggestions remarking that I am a "grown up" whose hand you will not hold. Although yes to cover yourself you did post some specifics on your 4th "I am leaving for good" declaration today. You are disrespectful, and impossible to deal with politely, even though I always do. The only reason I am responding here is because you always run to others and misrepresent the situation in an attempt to create a fictitious account of what happens. Your misrepresentation or reality is truly astounding and leads me to question your overall honesty. Please stop referencing me and I will finally be able to stop spending time defending myself against your made up accusations. [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 02:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

5839 +++$+++ 82.135.29.209 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-06 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.289067960E09 +++$+++ I believe you that you want to help NYyankees51. But it seems to obvious for everyone else that you are more hurting than helping him. Yes, when [[User_talk:Arzel#The_recent_9_month|not even looking into the original evidence in the SPI]], you may really think by yourself and claim that he has a \"largely good edit history\". But if this leads NYyankees51 [[User_talk:NYyankees51#Questions_from_other_users|that he tries to defends his bad actions]], this makes it harder for people to assume good faith. Think about it! [[Special:Contributions\/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ( +++$+++ I believe you that you want to help NYyankees51. But it seems to obvious for everyone else that you are more hurting than helping him. Yes, when [[User_talk:Arzel#The_recent_9_month|not even looking into the original evidence in the SPI]], you may really think by yourself and claim that he has a "largely good edit history". But if this leads NYyankees51 [[User_talk:NYyankees51#Questions_from_other_users|that he tries to defends his bad actions]], this makes it harder for people to assume good faith. Think about it! [[Special:Contributions/82.135.29.209|82.135.29.209]] ([[User talk:82.135.29.209|talk]]) 11:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5840 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5839 +++$+++ 5839 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.289070420E09 +++$+++ This coming from a [[WP:SPA]] that hides behind an IP address.   +++$+++ :This coming from a [[WP:SPA]] that hides behind an IP address.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 12:07, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5841 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5839 +++$+++ 5840 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.289083200E09 +++$+++ That is an unfortunate and baseless smear. Retracting it would be a good step.  +++$+++ :: That is an unfortunate and baseless smear. Retracting it would be a good step. [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 15:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5842 +++$+++ Akerans +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5839 +++$+++ 5841 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.289086080E09 +++$+++ As I write this; 40 of 44 (89.24%) article edits have been to Restoring Honor Rally. 200 of 208 (96.15%) talk edits have been to Talk:Restoring Honor Rally. Most of the 118 user talk edits focus on Restoring Honor Rally and\/or NYyankees51\/BS24. And, most of the Wikipedia and Wikipedia talk edits focus on Restoring Honor Rally and\/or NYyankees51\/BS24. 82.135.29.209 has a couple edits outside of Restoring Honor Rally and\/or NYyankees51\/BS24 to address sock puppet allegations of other uses and user name request. Sources: [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~soxred93\/pcount\/index.php?name=82.135.29.209&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia Edit Counter], [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&grouped=on&page=Restoring_Honor_rally Restoring Honor Rally edit count], [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&grouped=on&page=Talk:Restoring_Honor_rally Talk:Restoring Honor Rally edit count], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&contribs=user&target=82.135.29.209&namespace=3 82.135.29.209 User talk edits], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?limit=500&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=82.135.29.209&namespace=4&tagfilter=&year=&month=-1 82.135.29.209 Wikipedia edits], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?limit=500&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=82.135.29.209&namespace=5&tagfilter=&year=&month=-1 82.135.29.209 Wikipedia talk edits]. \/\/  +++$+++ :::As I write this; 40 of 44 (89.24%) article edits have been to Restoring Honor Rally. 200 of 208 (96.15%) talk edits have been to Talk:Restoring Honor Rally. Most of the 118 user talk edits focus on Restoring Honor Rally and/or NYyankees51/BS24. And, most of the Wikipedia and Wikipedia talk edits focus on Restoring Honor Rally and/or NYyankees51/BS24. 82.135.29.209 has a couple edits outside of Restoring Honor Rally and/or NYyankees51/BS24 to address sock puppet allegations of other uses and user name request. Sources: [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pcount/index.php?name=82.135.29.209&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia Edit Counter], [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&grouped=on&page=Restoring_Honor_rally Restoring Honor Rally edit count], [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&grouped=on&page=Talk:Restoring_Honor_rally Talk:Restoring Honor Rally edit count], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&contribs=user&target=82.135.29.209&namespace=3 82.135.29.209 User talk edits], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=500&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=82.135.29.209&namespace=4&tagfilter=&year=&month=-1 82.135.29.209 Wikipedia edits], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=500&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=82.135.29.209&namespace=5&tagfilter=&year=&month=-1 82.135.29.209 Wikipedia talk edits]. // [[User:Akerans|Akerans]] ([[User talk:Akerans|talk]]) 16:28, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5843 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5839 +++$+++ 5842 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.289087460E09 +++$+++ You must think I don't know that IP209 is SPA (a fact not damning in and of itself at all). Oh well. Not my fault.    +++$+++ :::: You must think I don't know that IP209 is SPA (a fact not damning in and of itself at all). Oh well. Not my fault.   [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 16:51, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5844 +++$+++ Akerans +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5839 +++$+++ 5843 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.289090220E09 +++$+++ Or, the word ''\"[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Arzel&diff=prev&oldid=395181236 baseless]\"'' seems to have some completely different meaning of which I'm not aware. Care to elaborate?  +++$+++ :::::Or, the word ''"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arzel&diff=prev&oldid=395181236 baseless]"'' seems to have some completely different meaning of which I'm not aware. Care to elaborate? [[User:Akerans|Akerans]] ([[User talk:Akerans|talk]]) 17:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5845 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5839 +++$+++ 5844 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.289092500E09 +++$+++ On what?  +++$+++ :::::: On what? [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 18:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
5846 +++$+++ The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5839 +++$+++ 5845 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.289104620E09 +++$+++ Crickets?  +++$+++ ::::::: Crickets? [[User:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous]] ([[User talk:The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous|talk]]) 21:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

267987 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-20 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.206015660E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Hello. Your recent vandalism to [[Che Guevara]] has led to the article being closed for 5 days. Also You are being warned about personal harassing user [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] for the third time now. Further harassment will lead to formal complaints and possible loss of editing privileges.  This is you third warning of harassment today. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:Uw-warn -->   This is a warning ''  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Hello. Your recent vandalism to [[Che Guevara]] has led to the article being closed for 5 days. Also You are being warned about personal harassing user [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] for the third time now. Further harassment will lead to formal complaints and possible loss of editing privileges.  This is you third warning of harassment today. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:Uw-warn -->   This is a warning '' [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 05:21, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
267988 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267987 +++$+++ 267987 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.206017160E09 +++$+++ You have ignored our group planning and did not join in. The edits you were making were against group consensus.  You reverted me yesterday without warning or discussing, replacing the whole intro that I had been working on not only without discussing but without any warning. This ugly atmosphere occurs everytime another editor trys to work on the article. [[User:Polaris999]] will not work on the article because of you. Also, please stio the political attacks and rants on the article talk pages. Comment on content, not on editors. Regards,   +++$+++ :You have ignored our group planning and did not join in. The edits you were making were against group consensus.  You reverted me yesterday without warning or discussing, replacing the whole intro that I had been working on not only without discussing but without any warning. This ugly atmosphere occurs everytime another editor trys to work on the article. [[User:Polaris999]] will not work on the article because of you. Also, please stio the political attacks and rants on the article talk pages. Comment on content, not on editors. Regards,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 05:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

267990 +++$+++ EdJohnston +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267990 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-20 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.206003000E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. I'm sorry your 3RR report didn't seem to be formatted correctly. You over-wrote some of the example text that was intended as a guide for submitting reports, and I thought I'd better undo it from the [[WP:AN\/3RR]] noticeboard before any new reports came in. As an admin I was thinking of responding to your report, but I actually couldn't see a violation of the 3RR rule. I saw that Red reverted your work one time, and then he  made further edits that could have been removing some of your stuff, but they didn't seem to me to count as reverts per the rule. If you can re-do the complaint in the correct form, and if you can find four actual reverts in one day, I encourage you to re-submit.  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. I'm sorry your 3RR report didn't seem to be formatted correctly. You over-wrote some of the example text that was intended as a guide for submitting reports, and I thought I'd better undo it from the [[WP:AN/3RR]] noticeboard before any new reports came in. As an admin I was thinking of responding to your report, but I actually couldn't see a violation of the 3RR rule. I saw that Red reverted your work one time, and then he  made further edits that could have been removing some of your stuff, but they didn't seem to me to count as reverts per the rule. If you can re-do the complaint in the correct form, and if you can find four actual reverts in one day, I encourage you to re-submit. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 01:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
267991 +++$+++ Coppertwig +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267990 +++$+++ 267990 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.206005700E09 +++$+++ Really, the important thing is not how many reverts there were, but whether editors are getting along in a collaborative spirit, working together, discussing differences of opinion politely on the talk page, etc.  I suggest trying very hard to make your own behaviour as polite and collaborative as possible, expressing your points clearly but without things like bold type which make it look as if you're angry, and if you do that I think it's very likely that Redthoreau will also be polite and collaborative.  You may not get the article to be exactly the way you want it;  it has to be a [[WP:CONSENSUS]] and sometimes that means compromise. But I think the two of you can get along. -- +++$+++ :Really, the important thing is not how many reverts there were, but whether editors are getting along in a collaborative spirit, working together, discussing differences of opinion politely on the talk page, etc.  I suggest trying very hard to make your own behaviour as polite and collaborative as possible, expressing your points clearly but without things like bold type which make it look as if you're angry, and if you do that I think it's very likely that Redthoreau will also be polite and collaborative.  You may not get the article to be exactly the way you want it;  it has to be a [[WP:CONSENSUS]] and sometimes that means compromise. But I think the two of you can get along. --[[User:Coppertwig|Coppertwig]] ([[User talk:Coppertwig|talk]]) 02:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
267992 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267990 +++$+++ 267991 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.206065040E09 +++$+++ '''Correction of the facts''' - as it is clear that Mattisse has an issue getting them correctly and lies more than any editor I have ever seen ''(by the way that is not a personal attack, but a fact, he makes factually incorrect statements at will about me)''. (1) I am not a \u201csingle purpose account\u201d, and have contributed to a wide range of articles since I first began editing a few months ago. Yes many of them have been related to a similar subject area, but that is the area that is my expertise, thus I edit accordingly ''(just as most of Mattisse\u2019s edits have to deal with a similar subject matter which I believe may be Psycholgy ... oh the irony)''. Also all I have ever wanted was to be treated the same as anyone else ... it is Mattisse who believes that since he has (44 K edits) that it allows him to play de-facto monarch of any article for which he is involved in. ----- Yes, please do look at the article history, read the talk page and take note of my demeanor in contrast to Mattisse. You will find that he declared he was finished with the article and demanded that I stop messaging about him around Noon yesterday (he is notorious for doing this in the past) ... only to come back in the afternoon and begin editing again and false templating me against wiki policy. When I point out that he makes statements publicly on the talk page \u2013 only to then act as if they haven\u2019t happened, and ponder openly how I can react to such ''\u201coddity\u201d'', he then from that impugns that I am attacking his mental state ''(which is not necessary, as the facts speak for themselves)''. I have come across a wide range of people in my life, and I am truly dumbfounded at whatever ''\u201creality\u201d'' Mattisse seems to be living in. = Nothing he says represents reality, and thus when I became angry after weeks of this and in response to him calling me a sock puppet I called him ''\u201cInsane\u201d''. An insult? Possibly, but also a medical diagnosis I believe ''(as I am not sure what else to call it)''. I have made countless pleas for him to '''(1)''' Stop Harassing me '''(2)''' Stop templating me against wiki policy -- which he has been warned from a moderator about '''(3)''' Stop mirroring my edits and placing tags on any article I work on as a way to cause annoyance '''(4)''' Stop lying about my behavior, creating a situation where I am justified in defending myself, and thus responding '''(5)''' Be civil and collaborative instead of rude, divisive, irrational, \u201ccrazy\u201d, and combative. ---- I will continue to defend myself against his lies, as I believe I am entitled that opportunity. I do not rant, something he does often, and only '''defend my right to answer the charges against me'''. I would just as much prefer to never have to leave a message on his talk page again ... but unfortunately he won\u2019t leave my talk page alone, and thus every time he leaves a message for me, I respond in turn, and then discover another libelous smear he is spreading about me. As I asked several times nicely yesterday ... Mattisse please follow wiki policy, and leave me alone. If you wish to discuss something about me do it on the article talk page. I will not respond to you unless you message me or attack me on your talk page. Thank you.  +++$+++ ::'''Correction of the facts''' - as it is clear that Mattisse has an issue getting them correctly and lies more than any editor I have ever seen ''(by the way that is not a personal attack, but a fact, he makes factually incorrect statements at will about me)''. (1) I am not a “single purpose account”, and have contributed to a wide range of articles since I first began editing a few months ago. Yes many of them have been related to a similar subject area, but that is the area that is my expertise, thus I edit accordingly ''(just as most of Mattisse’s edits have to deal with a similar subject matter which I believe may be Psycholgy ... oh the irony)''. Also all I have ever wanted was to be treated the same as anyone else ... it is Mattisse who believes that since he has (44 K edits) that it allows him to play de-facto monarch of any article for which he is involved in. ----- Yes, please do look at the article history, read the talk page and take note of my demeanor in contrast to Mattisse. You will find that he declared he was finished with the article and demanded that I stop messaging about him around Noon yesterday (he is notorious for doing this in the past) ... only to come back in the afternoon and begin editing again and false templating me against wiki policy. When I point out that he makes statements publicly on the talk page – only to then act as if they haven’t happened, and ponder openly how I can react to such ''“oddity”'', he then from that impugns that I am attacking his mental state ''(which is not necessary, as the facts speak for themselves)''. I have come across a wide range of people in my life, and I am truly dumbfounded at whatever ''“reality”'' Mattisse seems to be living in. = Nothing he says represents reality, and thus when I became angry after weeks of this and in response to him calling me a sock puppet I called him ''“Insane”''. An insult? Possibly, but also a medical diagnosis I believe ''(as I am not sure what else to call it)''. I have made countless pleas for him to '''(1)''' Stop Harassing me '''(2)''' Stop templating me against wiki policy -- which he has been warned from a moderator about '''(3)''' Stop mirroring my edits and placing tags on any article I work on as a way to cause annoyance '''(4)''' Stop lying about my behavior, creating a situation where I am justified in defending myself, and thus responding '''(5)''' Be civil and collaborative instead of rude, divisive, irrational, “crazy”, and combative. ---- I will continue to defend myself against his lies, as I believe I am entitled that opportunity. I do not rant, something he does often, and only '''defend my right to answer the charges against me'''. I would just as much prefer to never have to leave a message on his talk page again ... but unfortunately he won’t leave my talk page alone, and thus every time he leaves a message for me, I respond in turn, and then discover another libelous smear he is spreading about me. As I asked several times nicely yesterday ... Mattisse please follow wiki policy, and leave me alone. If you wish to discuss something about me do it on the article talk page. I will not respond to you unless you message me or attack me on your talk page. Thank you. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 19:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

532666 +++$+++ Hanfresco +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-29 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.167418800E09 +++$+++ Would you be willing to move the Du Huan section of [[Battle of Talas]] to a new article [[Du Huan]]?  +++$+++ Would you be willing to move the Du Huan section of [[Battle of Talas]] to a new article [[Du Huan]]? [[User:Hanfresco|Hanfresco]] 11:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
532667 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532666 +++$+++ 532666 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.167421800E09 +++$+++ Done. If you can, could you correct the article now that it's a separate one? --''' +++$+++ : Done. If you can, could you correct the article now that it's a separate one? --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 11:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
532668 +++$+++ Hanfresco +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532666 +++$+++ 532667 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 10:12:00 +++$+++ 1.167934320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for moving the article. School is about to start but I'll see what I can do.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for moving the article. School is about to start but I'll see what I can do. [[User:Hanfresco|Hanfresco]] 10:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

267993 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-20 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.206019800E09 +++$+++ Are you aware that since '''[[User:Redthoreau]] began editing the article in December of 2006, he has edited the article more than all the editors togeher, including those that created it in 2004 and brought it to FA status?''' I am the only editor that has refused to be driven off. [[User:SandyGeorgia]], the FAR editor, warned me this was a hopeless case. Hopeless like wikipedia is becoming. I have over 44,000 edits in all fields and I am treated like a single purpose account. A bureaucrat knows the situation and has been watching for awhile. I have to  trust his judgment.   Regards,   +++$+++ Are you aware that since '''[[User:Redthoreau]] began editing the article in December of 2006, he has edited the article more than all the editors togeher, including those that created it in 2004 and brought it to FA status?''' I am the only editor that has refused to be driven off. [[User:SandyGeorgia]], the FAR editor, warned me this was a hopeless case. Hopeless like wikipedia is becoming. I have over 44,000 edits in all fields and I am treated like a single purpose account. A bureaucrat knows the situation and has been watching for awhile. I have to  trust his judgment.   Regards,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 06:30, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
267994 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.206020220E09 +++$+++ Mattisse. With all my due respects to your contributions and efforts, I must sincerely and explicitely say that the FAR and the content issues have no merit to me as an administrator. You came here to seek help re behaviour (3RR) and what I had to do is observe, note and wait. You went on templating each other without listening to the advice of many admins. So I had to warn. The bureaucrat thing is another story I believe which I am not obliged to know at this stage. I hope this is clear Mattisse. --  +++$+++ :Mattisse. With all my due respects to your contributions and efforts, I must sincerely and explicitely say that the FAR and the content issues have no merit to me as an administrator. You came here to seek help re behaviour (3RR) and what I had to do is observe, note and wait. You went on templating each other without listening to the advice of many admins. So I had to warn. The bureaucrat thing is another story I believe which I am not obliged to know at this stage. I hope this is clear Mattisse. -- [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up''® </sup></font>]]</small> 06:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
267995 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.206020640E09 +++$+++ How do you template someone? The TW is all I know, and that barely. Before that I was not able to template at all. Also, I have never  successfully filed a 3RR report as ther are olways rejected as \"malformed\". I do not understand the directions.  Regards,   +++$+++ :How do you template someone? The TW is all I know, and that barely. Before that I was not able to template at all. Also, I have never  successfully filed a 3RR report as ther are olways rejected as "malformed". I do not understand the directions.  Regards,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 06:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
267996 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 06:48:00 +++$+++ 1.206020880E09 +++$+++ As a favor, if you should ever answer me, would you answer me on my talk page as I have dificulty posting on yours yours. Thanks!   +++$+++ :As a favor, if you should ever answer me, would you answer me on my talk page as I have dificulty posting on yours yours. Thanks!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 06:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
267997 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 267996 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.206022500E09 +++$+++ No worries. --  +++$+++ ::No worries. -- [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up''® </sup></font>]]</small> 07:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
267998 +++$+++ Coppertwig +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 267997 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.206040860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking the time to post a message to me on my talk page.  I don't know much about the situation with this article.  I'm sorry you feel misunderstood.  It seems to me that Redthoreau was making so many edits that it must have been hard for you to even just watch and see what edits were happening, let alone figure out how to respond to them.  Maybe a lot of edits is a good thing, if they're good edits.  But I suppose it feels overwhelming for you.  I understand that you think there's a [[WP:OWN]] issue with this article.  I don't know what particular edits are involved with that.  I haven't really looked in detail at the article or any of the edits -- I was just quickly looking to see whether groups of words were being reverted in and out, without really noticing what the words said or anything, and I haven't read the whole talk page.  However, I think usually the way to proceed if you think there's a WP:OWN issue is to state clearly on the talk page the reasons for the changes you want to make, and perhaps get a third opinion [[WP:3O]] or get more editors involved by putting an announcement at a Wikiproject or [[WP:Requests for comment]].  If the reasons for the change are convincing to other editors, then you should be able to get support for the change.  I think you need to start by being very specific about what changes you want to make and about what the reasons for them are.  (Maybe you've already done this on a part of the talk page I didn't read.) -- +++$+++ :::Thanks for taking the time to post a message to me on my talk page.  I don't know much about the situation with this article.  I'm sorry you feel misunderstood.  It seems to me that Redthoreau was making so many edits that it must have been hard for you to even just watch and see what edits were happening, let alone figure out how to respond to them.  Maybe a lot of edits is a good thing, if they're good edits.  But I suppose it feels overwhelming for you.  I understand that you think there's a [[WP:OWN]] issue with this article.  I don't know what particular edits are involved with that.  I haven't really looked in detail at the article or any of the edits -- I was just quickly looking to see whether groups of words were being reverted in and out, without really noticing what the words said or anything, and I haven't read the whole talk page.  However, I think usually the way to proceed if you think there's a WP:OWN issue is to state clearly on the talk page the reasons for the changes you want to make, and perhaps get a third opinion [[WP:3O]] or get more editors involved by putting an announcement at a Wikiproject or [[WP:Requests for comment]].  If the reasons for the change are convincing to other editors, then you should be able to get support for the change.  I think you need to start by being very specific about what changes you want to make and about what the reasons for them are.  (Maybe you've already done this on a part of the talk page I didn't read.) --[[User:Coppertwig|Coppertwig]] ([[User talk:Coppertwig|talk]]) 12:21, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
267999 +++$+++ Coppertwig +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 267997 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.206042060E09 +++$+++ You said at [[WP:AN\/3RR]], ''\"[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/3RR&diff=199509250&oldid=199507390 By the way, feel free to stop following me around any time.]\"'' If this was addressed to Redthoreau, please note that it's totally appropriate, even expected, for someone to post a comment on a 3RR report if the report is about themself.  They might post an argument explaining why it was not a 3RR violation in their opinion, or an apology and a promise not to revert again, etc.  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=199524192&oldid=199506785 Following the contribution history of a user] and posting to articles they've edited can be appropriate at times, but is [[Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikistalking|inappropriate]] if the purpose is to punish or annoy the user.  Since other people can't always tell what one's intentions are, one needs to be careful if following someone's contrib history because it might look as if one's purpose is to annoy. -- +++$+++ :::You said at [[WP:AN/3RR]], ''"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&diff=199509250&oldid=199507390 By the way, feel free to stop following me around any time.]"'' If this was addressed to Redthoreau, please note that it's totally appropriate, even expected, for someone to post a comment on a 3RR report if the report is about themself.  They might post an argument explaining why it was not a 3RR violation in their opinion, or an apology and a promise not to revert again, etc.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=199524192&oldid=199506785 Following the contribution history of a user] and posting to articles they've edited can be appropriate at times, but is [[Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikistalking|inappropriate]] if the purpose is to punish or annoy the user.  Since other people can't always tell what one's intentions are, one needs to be careful if following someone's contrib history because it might look as if one's purpose is to annoy. --[[User:Coppertwig|Coppertwig]] ([[User talk:Coppertwig|talk]]) 12:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
268000 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 267999 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.206090420E09 +++$+++ Yes, I explained all that to him. I was objecting to his commenting under my comment on every talk page I posted on. In the past, admin protected me from that. I guess the rules are different now.   +++$+++ ::::Yes, I explained all that to him. I was objecting to his commenting under my comment on every talk page I posted on. In the past, admin protected me from that. I guess the rules are different now.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
268001 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.206102660E09 +++$+++ Just as a follow up, I don't understand you reply, now that time has passed. I have received mostly support. I have received support from a bureaucrat all along plus several Admins. The only people who do not support are those who do not look into it? Is that the case with you? Or did you really look at facts? Did you even look at the article stats - takes one minute.[http:\/\/vs.aka-online.de\/wppagehiststat\/ Article stats] - If you fill in Che Guevara in the slot on this link you will find that since 2004 [[User:Polaris999]] the creater of the article and the one who really brought it to FA status has the most edits. But, lo and behold, the person who started editing the article in December 2006 has the next largest number, over three times more that I do who have been here editing Cuban-related article with [[User:Polaris999]] and [[User:Zleitzen]] for two years. Does that make sense to you? And consider that [[Jimmy Wales]] put a POV tag on it last summer and it was lock down for a month or so. Therefore all the editors have left. Now the FAR review says the POV is worse than ever -- in fact unsalvable and will lose its star because of [[User:Redthoreau]]'s edits.  On what basis did you arrive at you conclusion to dismiss my concerns? This typical  response of Admins, often causing people to go over the edge, results in  stupid blocks, unnecessary ArbComs and ridiculous RFC's. Is this really right? Or am I crazy and have a mental illness as [[User:Redthoreau]] has been posting around wikipedia? Sign me really curious,  +++$+++ *Just as a follow up, I don't understand you reply, now that time has passed. I have received mostly support. I have received support from a bureaucrat all along plus several Admins. The only people who do not support are those who do not look into it? Is that the case with you? Or did you really look at facts? Did you even look at the article stats - takes one minute.[http://vs.aka-online.de/wppagehiststat/ Article stats] - If you fill in Che Guevara in the slot on this link you will find that since 2004 [[User:Polaris999]] the creater of the article and the one who really brought it to FA status has the most edits. But, lo and behold, the person who started editing the article in December 2006 has the next largest number, over three times more that I do who have been here editing Cuban-related article with [[User:Polaris999]] and [[User:Zleitzen]] for two years. Does that make sense to you? And consider that [[Jimmy Wales]] put a POV tag on it last summer and it was lock down for a month or so. Therefore all the editors have left. Now the FAR review says the POV is worse than ever -- in fact unsalvable and will lose its star because of [[User:Redthoreau]]'s edits.  On what basis did you arrive at you conclusion to dismiss my concerns? This typical  response of Admins, often causing people to go over the edge, results in  stupid blocks, unnecessary ArbComs and ridiculous RFC's. Is this really right? Or am I crazy and have a mental illness as [[User:Redthoreau]] has been posting around wikipedia? Sign me really curious, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 05:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
268002 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 268001 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.206103200E09 +++$+++ :It is not that rules have changed but it is our mentalities that have. There's too much stress going on and templates\/reports\/shoutings would definitely not help anyone. From time to time i get some short wiki-breaks and believe me, it helps millions. --  +++$+++ *:It is not that rules have changed but it is our mentalities that have. There's too much stress going on and templates/reports/shoutings would definitely not help anyone. From time to time i get some short wiki-breaks and believe me, it helps millions. -- [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up''® </sup></font>]]</small> 05:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
268003 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.206105660E09 +++$+++ Yes, I remember you now. You are the one that ridiculed me  and make a joke of me on AN\/I when someone made a frivolous  complaint about me. It happen while you were running for ArbCom and [[User:SandyGeorgia]] was so disgusted by your remarks on AN\/I that she retracted her vote for you. (And she did not even know me -- she was appalled by your behavior).  You apologized to her. I remember it clearly. If I am ever in an ArbCom and you are still a member, I will ask for your recusal on the basis of extreme prejudice against me and also your sloppy way of \"helping.\" Better to be honest and say you have no time than do a botched job that just causes more ill will on wikipedia.  +++$+++ *Yes, I remember you now. You are the one that ridiculed me  and make a joke of me on AN/I when someone made a frivolous  complaint about me. It happen while you were running for ArbCom and [[User:SandyGeorgia]] was so disgusted by your remarks on AN/I that she retracted her vote for you. (And she did not even know me -- she was appalled by your behavior).  You apologized to her. I remember it clearly. If I am ever in an ArbCom and you are still a member, I will ask for your recusal on the basis of extreme prejudice against me and also your sloppy way of "helping." Better to be honest and say you have no time than do a botched job that just causes more ill will on wikipedia. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 06:21, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
268004 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 268003 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.206106320E09 +++$+++ :Thanks for your words and for remembering 'who I am' now, Mattisse. Does your comment imply that you disagree with me that if you are templating users and reporting users on the 3RR board with wrong evidence would lead you to a block? You cannot work this way. Believe me. You are stressed and my suggestion to have a break has been made in good faith. This man is not the first admin who explained to you how to handle it. All admins on your talk page agreed about the same. So what ''is'' wrong with me? --  +++$+++ *:Thanks for your words and for remembering 'who I am' now, Mattisse. Does your comment imply that you disagree with me that if you are templating users and reporting users on the 3RR board with wrong evidence would lead you to a block? You cannot work this way. Believe me. You are stressed and my suggestion to have a break has been made in good faith. This man is not the first admin who explained to you how to handle it. All admins on your talk page agreed about the same. So what ''is'' wrong with me? -- [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up''® </sup></font>]]</small> 06:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
268005 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 267993 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.206108780E09 +++$+++ I have been asking repeatedly for help over the last several months on how to do templates, and when I filed the 3RR block  request yesterday I asked for help in several places at the time and got no help. Perhaps I would not be so stressed out if I could count on help from Admins. I sure would like to know how to issue templates and do 3RRs. I still do not know how to template except with TW. I do not know how to issue warning. No one yet has answered my requests at the various help boards, village junctions etc. I have been asking for months. The only successful 3RR I ever filed was because of a kind hearted editor, [[User:Salix Alba]] fixed it for me and the person was blocked for one month. You may not know that I was harassed for six months by a group of sock puppets and received ridicule similar to yours during that time from Admin. At least one of my harassers was an Admin who was part of the \"revert\" group.  It was only because of a case filed on ArbCom that a very kind ArbCom member (not you) recused himself and ferreted them out. But six of my first nine months on Wikipedia were spent being stalked, reverted, reported endlessly to AN\/I, personally attacked, RFCs filed against me,  blocked for reverting my own page, blocked for 3-RRs that I learned today were not really 3RRs. [[User:Salix Alba]]  saved me during that time or I would not still be here.  There is one bureaucrat (the one that found the sock puppets) that has alway come through for me and did today too, and 2 or 3 more that helped me today. They are not all like you. But  there are too many like you. The last incident in which an Admin  \"helped\" me, he ended up blaming me in an Arbcom against me over the issue. -- The ArbCom (not you) acted as if I did not exist (I was invisible) the outcome ignored me, and that Admin and another were reprimanded for their behavior that impacted me. So goes my live at Wikipedia. Well,  I know enough not to ask you anything again.  +++$+++ *I have been asking repeatedly for help over the last several months on how to do templates, and when I filed the 3RR block  request yesterday I asked for help in several places at the time and got no help. Perhaps I would not be so stressed out if I could count on help from Admins. I sure would like to know how to issue templates and do 3RRs. I still do not know how to template except with TW. I do not know how to issue warning. No one yet has answered my requests at the various help boards, village junctions etc. I have been asking for months. The only successful 3RR I ever filed was because of a kind hearted editor, [[User:Salix Alba]] fixed it for me and the person was blocked for one month. You may not know that I was harassed for six months by a group of sock puppets and received ridicule similar to yours during that time from Admin. At least one of my harassers was an Admin who was part of the "revert" group.  It was only because of a case filed on ArbCom that a very kind ArbCom member (not you) recused himself and ferreted them out. But six of my first nine months on Wikipedia were spent being stalked, reverted, reported endlessly to AN/I, personally attacked, RFCs filed against me,  blocked for reverting my own page, blocked for 3-RRs that I learned today were not really 3RRs. [[User:Salix Alba]]  saved me during that time or I would not still be here.  There is one bureaucrat (the one that found the sock puppets) that has alway come through for me and did today too, and 2 or 3 more that helped me today. They are not all like you. But  there are too many like you. The last incident in which an Admin  "helped" me, he ended up blaming me in an Arbcom against me over the issue. -- The ArbCom (not you) acted as if I did not exist (I was invisible) the outcome ignored me, and that Admin and another were reprimanded for their behavior that impacted me. So goes my live at Wikipedia. Well,  I know enough not to ask you anything again. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 07:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

5851 +++$+++ Hauskalainen +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-09 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.294626360E09 +++$+++ I made some changes on the basis of neutrality and you reversed it on the grounds of source reliability.  This does not make sense. We cannot have a section called \"Rationing\" and then sub it with NICE and IPAB as if it were correct that these are rationing bodies. That is POV. By putting the headings as questions it leaves it open to the reader to read the sections and decide for themselves. I am just about to edit the article to give counterbalancing opinions on this issue. My edit was therefore on the grounds of NPOV and not reliabilty. -- +++$+++ I made some changes on the basis of neutrality and you reversed it on the grounds of source reliability.  This does not make sense. We cannot have a section called "Rationing" and then sub it with NICE and IPAB as if it were correct that these are rationing bodies. That is POV. By putting the headings as questions it leaves it open to the reader to read the sections and decide for themselves. I am just about to edit the article to give counterbalancing opinions on this issue. My edit was therefore on the grounds of NPOV and not reliabilty. --[[User:Hauskalainen|Hauskalainen]] ([[User talk:Hauskalainen|talk]]) 18:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
5852 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5851 +++$+++ 5851 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.294626540E09 +++$+++ You renamed the headers with a question.  '''Is NICE a Death Panel?'''  We already know that your point of view is that they are not.  You then present the information in order to answer the question '''No'''.  This is Original Research in a very basic form.  WP is NOT a research paper.   +++$+++ :You renamed the headers with a question.  '''Is NICE a Death Panel?'''  We already know that your point of view is that they are not.  You then present the information in order to answer the question '''No'''.  This is Original Research in a very basic form.  WP is NOT a research paper.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 18:29, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

70027 +++$+++ Djwilms +++$+++ Djwilms +++$+++ 70027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-14 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.223971740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Djwilms|Djwilms]] ([[User talk:Djwilms#top|talk]]) 01:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
70028 +++$+++ PHG +++$+++ Djwilms +++$+++ 70027 +++$+++ 70027 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.223986800E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much Djwilms for properly identifying the image! Cheers  +++$+++ :Thank you very much Djwilms for properly identifying the image! Cheers [[User:PHG|PHG]] ([[User talk:PHG|talk]]) 05:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

5853 +++$+++ Hauskalainen +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5853 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-10 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.294651620E09 +++$+++ No, I renamed the header \"Is NICE comparable with the IPAB?\", Not \"Is NICE a Death Panel? . This is to invite the reader to look at the unsubstantiated opinion expressed by David Grazter and compare it with hard evidence from UK sources. Gratzer claimed that it was a comparable body and I wanted to present material that shows it isn't. The IPAB sets doctors remuneration and NICE has nothing at all to do with doctor's salaries. That is the work of two other groups wholly unconnected to NICE. The fact that NICE is a clinical research reviewer which gives guidance to clinicians and IPAB does not.  It was totally POV for the article just to list NICE under RATIONING and have a statement from an unreliable Canadian comparing chalk and cheese and calling them \"comparable\".  I cannot delete an untruth because a reliable source published it, so I can only present more believable information from even more reliable sources to show that there is another view. Which way the reader answers the question in the section heading would be entirely up to them.  +++$+++ No, I renamed the header "Is NICE comparable with the IPAB?", Not "Is NICE a Death Panel? . This is to invite the reader to look at the unsubstantiated opinion expressed by David Grazter and compare it with hard evidence from UK sources. Gratzer claimed that it was a comparable body and I wanted to present material that shows it isn't. The IPAB sets doctors remuneration and NICE has nothing at all to do with doctor's salaries. That is the work of two other groups wholly unconnected to NICE. The fact that NICE is a clinical research reviewer which gives guidance to clinicians and IPAB does not.  It was totally POV for the article just to list NICE under RATIONING and have a statement from an unreliable Canadian comparing chalk and cheese and calling them "comparable".  I cannot delete an untruth because a reliable source published it, so I can only present more believable information from even more reliable sources to show that there is another view. Which way the reader answers the question in the section heading would be entirely up to them. [[User:Hauskalainen|Hauskalainen]] ([[User talk:Hauskalainen|talk]]) 01:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
5854 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5853 +++$+++ 5853 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.294653480E09 +++$+++ Potato - Tomato, in either case you are presenting your own research.  You may not agree with Grazter opinion, but that does not mean that he is wrong, and for you to try to [[WP:TRUTH|prove]] that he is wrong is a violation of original research.   +++$+++ :Potato - Tomato, in either case you are presenting your own research.  You may not agree with Grazter opinion, but that does not mean that he is wrong, and for you to try to [[WP:TRUTH|prove]] that he is wrong is a violation of original research.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 01:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

5856 +++$+++ Jesanj +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5856 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-12 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.294880700E09 +++$+++ <\/blockquote>  +++$+++ </blockquote> [[User:Jesanj|Jesanj]] ([[User talk:Jesanj|talk]]) 17:05, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
5857 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5856 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.294911360E09 +++$+++ A liberal talking to the liberal NPR is hardly an opinion which I would suspect to argue otherwise.  Your cited study is limited in scope.  Look, I am not going to discuss this in detail as my information is from within health care finance.  You can choose to believe the following or not (it matters little to me) but this is a fact [http:\/\/www.aha.org\/aha\/content\/2005\/pdf\/05fragilehosps.pdf]   Here is an article that touches on how individual physicians game the system [http:\/\/seniorfriendlyguilford.wordpress.com\/2009\/12\/15\/medicare-paradox-hospitals-lose-money-if-patients-stay-too-long-doctors-gain-money-for-longer-stays\/]  The health care financial system is extrememly complex, far to complex to go into detail here.   +++$+++ ::A liberal talking to the liberal NPR is hardly an opinion which I would suspect to argue otherwise.  Your cited study is limited in scope.  Look, I am not going to discuss this in detail as my information is from within health care finance.  You can choose to believe the following or not (it matters little to me) but this is a fact [http://www.aha.org/aha/content/2005/pdf/05fragilehosps.pdf]   Here is an article that touches on how individual physicians game the system [http://seniorfriendlyguilford.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/medicare-paradox-hospitals-lose-money-if-patients-stay-too-long-doctors-gain-money-for-longer-stays/]  The health care financial system is extrememly complex, far to complex to go into detail here.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 01:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
5858 +++$+++ Hauskalainen +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5856 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.294912980E09 +++$+++ Er.. you don't need to be a top flight mathematician to realise that if the AHA went around saying they were making lots of money on Medicare and Medicaid services, what would Medicare do?  Wise up Dude. They HAVE to say their members are losing money because they would be idiots not to - and so would those answering the questionnaire. The American government has medical facilities at the VA and knows how much it costs to runs services. If I was a hospital manager and losing money on Medicare patients I'd just stop taking Medicare patients. I could then serve the private insurers better. The reason that it does not happen that way is because Medicare IS profitable business. It's a pity that US does not have many public hospitals running alongside the private ones, nor a public insurer operating alongside all the private ones. Then people would have a real choice. The NHS in England know very well how much to pay the private hospitals for service because it runs all the same services itself and much more besides. In England the private hospitals are mostly \"non-profit\", but its a acam because the managers move the profits through trading to other entities. No doubt the same happens in the US. +++$+++ :::Er.. you don't need to be a top flight mathematician to realise that if the AHA went around saying they were making lots of money on Medicare and Medicaid services, what would Medicare do?  Wise up Dude. They HAVE to say their members are losing money because they would be idiots not to - and so would those answering the questionnaire. The American government has medical facilities at the VA and knows how much it costs to runs services. If I was a hospital manager and losing money on Medicare patients I'd just stop taking Medicare patients. I could then serve the private insurers better. The reason that it does not happen that way is because Medicare IS profitable business. It's a pity that US does not have many public hospitals running alongside the private ones, nor a public insurer operating alongside all the private ones. Then people would have a real choice. The NHS in England know very well how much to pay the private hospitals for service because it runs all the same services itself and much more besides. In England the private hospitals are mostly "non-profit", but its a acam because the managers move the profits through trading to other entities. No doubt the same happens in the US.[[User:Hauskalainen|Hauskalainen]] ([[User talk:Hauskalainen|talk]]) 02:03, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
5859 +++$+++ Jesanj +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5856 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.294913340E09 +++$+++ For what it is worth, the study you call limited says it is more comprehensive than the most cited article about defensive medicine.  +++$+++ :::For what it is worth, the study you call limited says it is more comprehensive than the most cited article about defensive medicine. [[User:Jesanj|Jesanj]] ([[User talk:Jesanj|talk]]) 02:09, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
5860 +++$+++ Jesanj +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5856 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.305331440E09 +++$+++ Above, you take something to be fact (\"this is a fact [http:\/\/www.aha.org\/aha\/content\/2005\/pdf\/05fragilehosps.pdf]\") that is based on a theory (cost-shifting) that is not widely accepted. Uwe Reinhardt says \"It is widely assumed, among both health insurers and the hospital industry, that the more rapidly rising prices paid by private insurers reflect a cost shift from government to the private sector. The theory is that private insurers must compensate with higher prices for the shortfall from actual cost imposed on providers of care by unduly low Medicaid and Medicare payment rates ... With a few exceptions, economists remain skeptical on the validity of the cost-shift theory, although it may operate in some market environments.\" [http:\/\/economix.blogs.nytimes.com\/2011\/05\/13\/would-privatizing-medicare-lead-to-better-cost-controls\/] The quoted words \"remain skeptical\" link [http:\/\/theincidentaleconomist.com\/wordpress\/simply-put-price-discrimination-and-cost-shifting\/ to this post].  +++$+++ :::Above, you take something to be fact ("this is a fact [http://www.aha.org/aha/content/2005/pdf/05fragilehosps.pdf]") that is based on a theory (cost-shifting) that is not widely accepted. Uwe Reinhardt says "It is widely assumed, among both health insurers and the hospital industry, that the more rapidly rising prices paid by private insurers reflect a cost shift from government to the private sector. The theory is that private insurers must compensate with higher prices for the shortfall from actual cost imposed on providers of care by unduly low Medicaid and Medicare payment rates ... With a few exceptions, economists remain skeptical on the validity of the cost-shift theory, although it may operate in some market environments." [http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/13/would-privatizing-medicare-lead-to-better-cost-controls/] The quoted words "remain skeptical" link [http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/simply-put-price-discrimination-and-cost-shifting/ to this post]. [[User:Jesanj|Jesanj]] ([[User talk:Jesanj|talk]]) 17:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
5861 +++$+++ Jesanj +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5856 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.305337380E09 +++$+++ The post references this study: {{doi|10.1111\/j.1468-0009.2011.00621.x}}. It concludes that one should have skepticism towards the document you cite.  +++$+++ :::The post references this study: {{doi|10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00621.x}}. It concludes that one should have skepticism towards the document you cite. [[User:Jesanj|Jesanj]] ([[User talk:Jesanj|talk]]) 18:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

530148 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530148 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-12 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.236857880E09 +++$+++ Is [[:File:Barack Obama - ITN.jpg|this image]] needed anymore? It has a temp file template. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ Is [[:File:Barack Obama - ITN.jpg|this image]] needed anymore? It has a temp file template. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
530149 +++$+++ PFHLai +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530148 +++$+++ 530148 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.236910740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note, Royalbroil.  I've forgotten about this ITN image. I just deleted it.  Someone has uploaded it to WCommons without the full edit history, so I wasn't sure if we need to keep it around.  But I suppose it's okay to delete it, since I am responsible for all 18 edits and I wouldn't mind either way.  So it goes.... -- +++$+++ : Thanks for the note, Royalbroil.  I've forgotten about this ITN image. I just deleted it.  Someone has uploaded it to WCommons without the full edit history, so I wasn't sure if we need to keep it around.  But I suppose it's okay to delete it, since I am responsible for all 18 edits and I wouldn't mind either way.  So it goes.... --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 19:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

5862 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-25 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.296021360E09 +++$+++ Making unproven accusations against other editors is uncivil.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Tea_Party_movement&diff=409992676&oldid=409960773] Please see [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:NPA]]. In the future, please focus on the edits, not the editor. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ Making unproven accusations against other editors is uncivil.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tea_Party_movement&diff=409992676&oldid=409960773] Please see [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:NPA]]. In the future, please focus on the edits, not the editor. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 21:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
5863 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.296028920E09 +++$+++ I did focus on the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tea_Party_movement&action=historysubmit&diff=409841672&oldid=409840745 edit], you just happened to be the editor that made it.  Perhaps gaming was too strong of a term, but it certainly was pointy.   +++$+++ :I did focus on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tea_Party_movement&action=historysubmit&diff=409841672&oldid=409840745 edit], you just happened to be the editor that made it.  Perhaps gaming was too strong of a term, but it certainly was pointy.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 00:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
5864 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.296032580E09 +++$+++ I believe you citation request to have been retalitory.  You used that source to make a statement that while technically true, was somewhat disingenous and not holding with the point that that source was making.  I added the \"who\" because the statement as it stood was nebulous and implied more than the source would claim.  You then added the citation request on top of the primary statement, which was backed by the source.  If this had been a fly-by tagging it would have been an edit question, but you have been quite involved in this discussion and you obviously have read this source, or at least the parts relating to this discussion.  As such, you clearly knew that the source backed up the primary statement.  That, to me, is disruptive and not a suitable action for an admin, regardless if you are editing as a \"regular\".  I hope I make myself clear.   +++$+++ :::I believe you citation request to have been retalitory.  You used that source to make a statement that while technically true, was somewhat disingenous and not holding with the point that that source was making.  I added the "who" because the statement as it stood was nebulous and implied more than the source would claim.  You then added the citation request on top of the primary statement, which was backed by the source.  If this had been a fly-by tagging it would have been an edit question, but you have been quite involved in this discussion and you obviously have read this source, or at least the parts relating to this discussion.  As such, you clearly knew that the source backed up the primary statement.  That, to me, is disruptive and not a suitable action for an admin, regardless if you are editing as a "regular".  I hope I make myself clear.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 01:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
5865 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.296036540E09 +++$+++ What I see is you making a sequence of unfounded assumptions about my motives. The statement in question was \"The Tea Party movement is often cited as an example of [[grassroots]] political activity\". I don't see on which page Rasmussen makes the assertion that it is \"often cited\" as such an example. Can you please point it out to me? &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::::What I see is you making a sequence of unfounded assumptions about my motives. The statement in question was "The Tea Party movement is often cited as an example of [[grassroots]] political activity". I don't see on which page Rasmussen makes the assertion that it is "often cited" as such an example. Can you please point it out to me? &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 02:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
5866 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.296049140E09 +++$+++ What I see is you trying to explain your way out and change the issue.  If you want to suddenly claim semantics that is your prerogative, but I would note that you did not make such a claim prior to my addition.   +++$+++ :::::What I see is you trying to explain your way out and change the issue.  If you want to suddenly claim semantics that is your prerogative, but I would note that you did not make such a claim prior to my addition.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 05:39, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
5867 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.296050460E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry if you don't like me explaining my edit, and you seem to be once again assuming bad faith by characterizing my response to you as \"explain your way out and change the issue\". The issue here is your response to my edit, so I'm not changing the subject at all.  You said that I made a pointy, POV edit because I added a citation request for a statement that did not appear to be supported by the nearest footnote. My citation request was completely valid. I again ask you to prove that it was not. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::::::I'm sorry if you don't like me explaining my edit, and you seem to be once again assuming bad faith by characterizing my response to you as "explain your way out and change the issue". The issue here is your response to my edit, so I'm not changing the subject at all.  You said that I made a pointy, POV edit because I added a citation request for a statement that did not appear to be supported by the nearest footnote. My citation request was completely valid. I again ask you to prove that it was not. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 06:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
5868 +++$+++ Arthur Rubin +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.296053160E09 +++$+++ As far as I can tell, Rasmussen said that the TP '''is''' an example of [[grassroots]] political activity, not \"cited as\", or \"often cited as\".  \u2014  +++$+++ ::::::::As far as I can tell, Rasmussen said that the TP '''is''' an example of [[grassroots]] political activity, not "cited as", or "often cited as".  — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]]  [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 06:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
5869 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.296057840E09 +++$+++ The text in question is \"The Tea Party movement is often cited as an example of grassroots political activity\". Does Rasmussen say that? If not, then it was appropriate to ask for a source for that assertion. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::::::::The text in question is "The Tea Party movement is often cited as an example of grassroots political activity". Does Rasmussen say that? If not, then it was appropriate to ask for a source for that assertion. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 08:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
5870 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.296100560E09 +++$+++ Prove that you cared prior.  You seem to be looking for a justification after the fact.  I will not play your game.   +++$+++ ::::::::::Prove that you cared prior.  You seem to be looking for a justification after the fact.  I will not play your game.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 19:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
5871 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.296103860E09 +++$+++ There's no game here. You're making serious accusations without justification. Please do not make personal remarks or accusations against other editors on article talk pages. If you have a problem with an editor then user their talk page to discuss it, or one of the other available forums. The only topic for article talk pages is the improvement of the article. Consistent failure to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] or treating topics as a [[WP:BATTLE|battleground]] have led to editors being topic- or even site-banned. This is a serious issue, not a game. I hope this won't come up again. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::::::::::There's no game here. You're making serious accusations without justification. Please do not make personal remarks or accusations against other editors on article talk pages. If you have a problem with an editor then user their talk page to discuss it, or one of the other available forums. The only topic for article talk pages is the improvement of the article. Consistent failure to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] or treating topics as a [[WP:BATTLE|battleground]] have led to editors being topic- or even site-banned. This is a serious issue, not a game. I hope this won't come up again. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 20:51, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
5872 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.296120060E09 +++$+++ Do not threaten me because I fail to agree with your point of view.  I could have gone straight to ANI and reported you there, I figured we could resolve our issues here.  Now you are trying to turn it back on me.  If you have a problem take it to ANI, but do not threaten me again.   +++$+++ ::::::::::::Do not threaten me because I fail to agree with your point of view.  I could have gone straight to ANI and reported you there, I figured we could resolve our issues here.  Now you are trying to turn it back on me.  If you have a problem take it to ANI, but do not threaten me again.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 01:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
5873 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5862 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.296120480E09 +++$+++ I don't care about your point of view. It's just your behavior. Please don't make unfounded accusations about other editors on article talk pages or assume bad faith. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::::::::::::I don't care about your point of view. It's just your behavior. Please don't make unfounded accusations about other editors on article talk pages or assume bad faith. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 01:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

525265 +++$+++ Hu12 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525265 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-28 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.175150340E09 +++$+++ As your aware [[WP:SPAM]] is considered a guideline on Wikipedia. Recent [[WP:SPA]] anon spam only account has recently inserted multiple links to the same URL, over multiple articles. Adding external links to an article for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. Although the specific links may be allowed under some circumstances, repeatedly adding links will in most cases result in all of them being removed. Edits by [[Special:Contributions\/162.129.70.42|162.129.70.42]] have been removed. -- +++$+++ As your aware [[WP:SPAM]] is considered a guideline on Wikipedia. Recent [[WP:SPA]] anon spam only account has recently inserted multiple links to the same URL, over multiple articles. Adding external links to an article for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. Although the specific links may be allowed under some circumstances, repeatedly adding links will in most cases result in all of them being removed. Edits by [[Special:Contributions/162.129.70.42|162.129.70.42]] have been removed. --[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] 23:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
525266 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525265 +++$+++ 525265 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.175151600E09 +++$+++ You deleted 22 valid links to [[Johns Hopkins University]]'s [[DermAtlas]]. It isn't spam if a user puts in multiple links to reliable sources, such as PubMed or IMDB, and Johns Hopkins University is far more reliable than either of those. -- +++$+++ :You deleted 22 valid links to [[Johns Hopkins University]]'s [[DermAtlas]]. It isn't spam if a user puts in multiple links to reliable sources, such as PubMed or IMDB, and Johns Hopkins University is far more reliable than either of those. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 00:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
525267 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525265 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.175156280E09 +++$+++ (Amending my previous comment - DermAtlas is more reliable than IMDB, but not more reliable than PubMed). -- +++$+++ :::(Amending my previous comment - DermAtlas is more reliable than IMDB, but not more reliable than PubMed). --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
525268 +++$+++ Hu12 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525265 +++$+++ 525266 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.175153700E09 +++$+++ Although I do agree with the reliability of the link, the manner of which they were added was bad faith and doesn't confer a license to spam Wikipedia even when it's true. see [[Special:Contributions\/162.129.70.42|162.129.70.42 contributions]]. Note: IP 162.129.70.42 NetRange which added these links originates from ''The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions'' Baltimore, Maryland, from NameServer: ENS1.JHMI.EDU. This is Also A [[WP:COI]], and against Wikipedia's  [[WP:EL#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest|External links policy]]. I have tagged the IP with SharedIPEDU accordingly -- +++$+++ ::Although I do agree with the reliability of the link, the manner of which they were added was bad faith and doesn't confer a license to spam Wikipedia even when it's true. see [[Special:Contributions/162.129.70.42|162.129.70.42 contributions]]. Note: IP 162.129.70.42 NetRange which added these links originates from ''The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions'' Baltimore, Maryland, from NameServer: ENS1.JHMI.EDU. This is Also A [[WP:COI]], and against Wikipedia's  [[WP:EL#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest|External links policy]]. I have tagged the IP with SharedIPEDU accordingly --[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] 00:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
525269 +++$+++ Droliver +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525265 +++$+++ 525265 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.175159520E09 +++$+++ While I'm pretty aggressive in removing commercial links with medical topics, I think this particular one looks fine. There's no advertising. It's not a promotional vehicle for someone's practice. I have no issue with it. I think '42' links to it may be a bit much, but it's a fairly neutral site with good images  +++$+++ * While I'm pretty aggressive in removing commercial links with medical topics, I think this particular one looks fine. There's no advertising. It's not a promotional vehicle for someone's practice. I have no issue with it. I think '42' links to it may be a bit much, but it's a fairly neutral site with good images [[User:Droliver|Droliver]] 02:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
525270 +++$+++ Panfakes +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525265 +++$+++ 525269 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.175220900E09 +++$+++ It's still a conflict of interest.  +++$+++ :: It's still a conflict of interest. [[User:Panfakes|Panfakes]] 19:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

268008 +++$+++ Arthur_Rubin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268008 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-21 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.206129720E09 +++$+++ I was wondering why you took it out of [[:Category:Child abuse]] and [[:Category:Sexual abuse]], and added [[:Category:Sex crimes]].  It seems to me that the previous arrangment is more in keeping with [[WP:CAT]].  &mdash;  +++$+++ I was wondering why you took it out of [[:Category:Child abuse]] and [[:Category:Sexual abuse]], and added [[:Category:Sex crimes]].  It seems to me that the previous arrangment is more in keeping with [[WP:CAT]].  &mdash; [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]]  [[User_talk:Arthur_Rubin|(talk)]] 13:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
268009 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268008 +++$+++ 268008 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.206132480E09 +++$+++ I am not understanding what you are asking. I was working with the parent category [[:Category:Sex crimes]] which does not include [[:Category:Child abuse]].  The goal was to remove as many redundancies of the terms in the same category as possible and remove inappropriate categories. For example, the  goal was  not to lump the sex  offenders in the same of  category of [[:Category:Child sexual abuse]]. In order to avoid having [[:Category:Child sexual  abuse]] appear as it did when you view the over all [[:Category:Sex crimes]]  - no categories mentioned more than once, no categories repeated by being  hidden under another less appropriate categories, like American sex abusers under child sex abuse, I made the changes I did. As an example, previously  you did not see American sex abusers unless you clicked  Child sex abuse, while there was a whole other Category of  Sex abusers that did not include American sex abusers.  At least, that is my memory of the rationale. The important issue is that when you go to [[:Category:Child abuse]]  the entries are under the correct subcategories and nothing is misplaced. Hope I have explained myself correctly. Yesterday when I looked at [[:Category:Sex crimes]]  (and made one last change is was the best I have seen it. Also, Child abuse in general is not considered Child sex abuse and should not appear in [[:Category:Sex crimes]]. Perhaps you could be more specific, if I have not been clear in my explanation. I would be glad to answer any more questions. I will check the categories again today to make sure there are no mistakes.   Regards,  +++$+++ :I am not understanding what you are asking. I was working with the parent category [[:Category:Sex crimes]] which does not include [[:Category:Child abuse]].  The goal was to remove as many redundancies of the terms in the same category as possible and remove inappropriate categories. For example, the  goal was  not to lump the sex  offenders in the same of  category of [[:Category:Child sexual abuse]]. In order to avoid having [[:Category:Child sexual  abuse]] appear as it did when you view the over all [[:Category:Sex crimes]]  - no categories mentioned more than once, no categories repeated by being  hidden under another less appropriate categories, like American sex abusers under child sex abuse, I made the changes I did. As an example, previously  you did not see American sex abusers unless you clicked  Child sex abuse, while there was a whole other Category of  Sex abusers that did not include American sex abusers.  At least, that is my memory of the rationale. The important issue is that when you go to [[:Category:Child abuse]]  the entries are under the correct subcategories and nothing is misplaced. Hope I have explained myself correctly. Yesterday when I looked at [[:Category:Sex crimes]]  (and made one last change is was the best I have seen it. Also, Child abuse in general is not considered Child sex abuse and should not appear in [[:Category:Sex crimes]]. Perhaps you could be more specific, if I have not been clear in my explanation. I would be glad to answer any more questions. I will check the categories again today to make sure there are no mistakes.   Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
268010 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268008 +++$+++ 268009 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.206145680E09 +++$+++ There is something wrong now with the [[:Category:Sex crimes]]. [[:Category:Child abuse]] now show up twice. Once on its own, and once as a subcategory under [[:Category:Sexual abuse]] so it is double listed. Can you think of a way to fix this? Regards,  +++$+++ ::There is something wrong now with the [[:Category:Sex crimes]]. [[:Category:Child abuse]] now show up twice. Once on its own, and once as a subcategory under [[:Category:Sexual abuse]] so it is double listed. Can you think of a way to fix this? Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
268011 +++$+++ Arthur_Rubin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268008 +++$+++ 268010 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.206146640E09 +++$+++ I don't see it, possibly because I fixed it while you were checking.  Could you confirm and explain in more detail?  &mdash;  +++$+++ :::I don't see it, possibly because I fixed it while you were checking.  Could you confirm and explain in more detail?  &mdash; [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]]  [[User_talk:Arthur_Rubin|(talk)]] 17:44, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
268012 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268008 +++$+++ 268011 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.206146760E09 +++$+++ Actually, I just checked the cagegory again and it looks fine. I guess I was confused. Sorry!   +++$+++ ::::Actually, I just checked the cagegory again and it looks fine. I guess I was confused. Sorry!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

530154 +++$+++ Doncram +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-15 06:17:00 +++$+++ 1.237123020E09 +++$+++ You're invited to sign up as a founding member, at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council\/Proposals#WikiProject Historic Sites]] ! :)  +++$+++ You're invited to sign up as a founding member, at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#WikiProject Historic Sites]] ! :) [[User:Doncram|doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 06:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
530155 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530154 +++$+++ 530154 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.237143300E09 +++$+++ I support the idea and urge others to join the group. I just don't want to join. I focus on my state only, which is covered under [[WP:NRHP]]. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I support the idea and urge others to join the group. I just don't want to join. I focus on my state only, which is covered under [[WP:NRHP]]. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 11:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

530156 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530156 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-15 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.237147080E09 +++$+++ I was just going to do it, but it looks like Peter Symonds is going to do it. If he doesn't, I'll come back and do it in half an hour or so, as I was just about to take a break. Won't hurt if it's a few minutes late, we don't have any kind of backlog.  +++$+++ I was just going to do it, but it looks like Peter Symonds is going to do it. If he doesn't, I'll come back and do it in half an hour or so, as I was just about to take a break. Won't hurt if it's a few minutes late, we don't have any kind of backlog. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 12:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
530157 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530156 +++$+++ 530156 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.237147200E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Gato. I'll be gone in a few minutes. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thanks, Gato. I'll be gone in a few minutes. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
530158 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530156 +++$+++ 530157 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.237148340E09 +++$+++ {{done}}  +++$+++ ::{{done}} [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 13:19, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

268013 +++$+++ Coppertwig +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-21 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.206133140E09 +++$+++ I'm also planning to reply on my talk page to some points you raised. -- +++$+++ I'm also planning to reply on my talk page to some points you raised. --[[User:Coppertwig|Coppertwig]] ([[User talk:Coppertwig|talk]]) 13:59, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
268014 +++$+++ Coppertwig +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268013 +++$+++ 268013 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.206212940E09 +++$+++ I'm striking out the warning.  It was a mistake.  I'm sorry.  I should have used persuasion, not a threat.  I didn't realize how you would feel if you received a warning like that.  Also, after I posted the warning, I realized it was unrealistic.  If I had asked an admin to block you for something like that, they almost certainly would have refused.  I also realized that you were probably not aware that what you were doing was just what I had just asked you not to do.  So I should have just pointed that out to you.  -- +++$+++ :I'm striking out the warning.  It was a mistake.  I'm sorry.  I should have used persuasion, not a threat.  I didn't realize how you would feel if you received a warning like that.  Also, after I posted the warning, I realized it was unrealistic.  If I had asked an admin to block you for something like that, they almost certainly would have refused.  I also realized that you were probably not aware that what you were doing was just what I had just asked you not to do.  So I should have just pointed that out to you.  --[[User:Coppertwig|Coppertwig]] ([[User talk:Coppertwig|talk]]) 12:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

268015 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-21 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.206146340E09 +++$+++ Please take a new look at this article and see what you think,  I like to think (such humility lol)  I've improved it a bit.:)  +++$+++ Please take a new look at this article and see what you think,  I like to think (such humility lol)  I've improved it a bit.:) [[User:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="#FF1493">special, random, ]]</font></b>[[User talk:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="#FF1493">Merkinsmum]]</font></b> 17:39, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
268016 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268015 +++$+++ 268015 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.206167280E09 +++$+++ Are you aware that [[Timothy Leary]] was a foremost proponent of Psychedelic therapy and that he was fired from [[Harvard University]] for using his students as subject? (And he did a lot worse really). I was surprised to learn a while ago that in the 1950's in California it was considered a legitimate form of therapy, until they started the notorious experiments at Stanford University where [[Ken Kesey]] and the [[Grateful Dead]] were given LDS.  +++$+++ :Are you aware that [[Timothy Leary]] was a foremost proponent of Psychedelic therapy and that he was fired from [[Harvard University]] for using his students as subject? (And he did a lot worse really). I was surprised to learn a while ago that in the 1950's in California it was considered a legitimate form of therapy, until they started the notorious experiments at Stanford University where [[Ken Kesey]] and the [[Grateful Dead]] were given LDS. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
268017 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268015 +++$+++ 268016 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.206231720E09 +++$+++ Ooh I'll read up on that here a bit- interesting.  I did read a little about the subject years ago, when I had some friends who were into it for a while.  I saw so many friends\/people who regularly used drugs left mentally ill for years afterwards though, that nowadays they disgust me and I think they degrade people.  There've been a few more studies with psilocybin etc. recently.  I'm very sceptical about the safety of these type of treatments and think they would have substantial risks- basically, I imagine the results would be very variable, with some people being made more ill by them.  +++$+++ ::Ooh I'll read up on that here a bit- interesting.  I did read a little about the subject years ago, when I had some friends who were into it for a while.  I saw so many friends/people who regularly used drugs left mentally ill for years afterwards though, that nowadays they disgust me and I think they degrade people.  There've been a few more studies with psilocybin etc. recently.  I'm very sceptical about the safety of these type of treatments and think they would have substantial risks- basically, I imagine the results would be very variable, with some people being made more ill by them. [[User:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="#FF1493">special, random, ]]</font></b>[[User talk:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="#FF1493">Merkinsmum]]</font></b> 17:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
268018 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268015 +++$+++ 268017 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.206234180E09 +++$+++ A friend of mine was a student of Leary's and was largely responsible for Leary's firing by publishing articles in the [[Harvard Crimson]] and the [[Saturday Evening Post]] on what Leary was doing since the Harvard admin though Leary was conducting standard psychology experiments per experimental protoccols.   +++$+++ :::A friend of mine was a student of Leary's and was largely responsible for Leary's firing by publishing articles in the [[Harvard Crimson]] and the [[Saturday Evening Post]] on what Leary was doing since the Harvard admin though Leary was conducting standard psychology experiments per experimental protoccols.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

530161 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-17 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.237280220E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that. I thought the description under the header \"Song meanings\" was enough and that citing in the track listing would be messy. Although I meant to point out at DYK that the RT\xc9 review also mentioned the track listing. And have just discovered that I placed the wrong RT\xc9 review in the article... :( --<span style=\"color:red\">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]<\/span> <sub>  +++$+++ Sorry about that. I thought the description under the header "Song meanings" was enough and that citing in the track listing would be messy. Although I meant to point out at DYK that the RTÉ review also mentioned the track listing. And have just discovered that I placed the wrong RTÉ review in the article... :( --<span style="color:red">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]</span> <sub> [[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<big><u>S</u></big>]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Candlewicke|<big><u>T</u></big>]] </sup><sub>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:# :);color:green;"></span>|<span style="color:green;"># :)</span>}} </sub> 01:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
530162 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530161 +++$+++ 530161 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.237280640E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I must now upload the album cover of ''Shots'' before it appears on the Main Page. --<span style=\"color:red\">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]<\/span> <sub>  +++$+++ :Thanks! I must now upload the album cover of ''Shots'' before it appears on the Main Page. --<span style="color:red">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]</span> <sub> [[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<big><u>S</u></big>]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Candlewicke|<big><u>T</u></big>]] </sup><sub>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:# :);color:green;"></span>|<span style="color:green;"># :)</span>}} </sub> 02:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

558854 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558854 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-01 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.178074980E09 +++$+++ This should give time for new nominees and some publicity of the event. Unfortunately, the Newsletter wasn't even started until a few minutes ago, so I'd appreciate you help getting [[Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies\/Newsletter|it]] up to a standard where we can send it out first thing tomorrow.<br\/>I am looking forward to the coordinator team taking over :-). <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ This should give time for new nominees and some publicity of the event. Unfortunately, the Newsletter wasn't even started until a few minutes ago, so I'd appreciate you help getting [[Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Newsletter|it]] up to a standard where we can send it out first thing tomorrow.<br/>I am looking forward to the coordinator team taking over :-). <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 20:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
558855 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558854 +++$+++ 558854 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.178099880E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. I've fucked it up so it needs be redelivered to the people I've done anyway. gr... <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Fair enough. I've fucked it up so it needs be redelivered to the people I've done anyway. gr... <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 02:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
558856 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558854 +++$+++ 558855 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.178099940E09 +++$+++ Let me know when your happy with it. I'll work from the top and you can go from the bottom? <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Let me know when your happy with it. I'll work from the top and you can go from the bottom? <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 02:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
558857 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558854 +++$+++ 558856 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.178100240E09 +++$+++ No I posted it in the wrong place on the first page and then copy-and-pasted. Sigh. I always mess up copy-and-paste. I once sent off a job application full of praise for how wonderful the competition were.... <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::No I posted it in the wrong place on the first page and then copy-and-pasted. Sigh. I always mess up copy-and-paste. I once sent off a job application full of praise for how wonderful the competition were.... <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 03:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

5875 +++$+++ Arthur Rubin +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-26 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.296052980E09 +++$+++ I agree that Mayer is not a reliable source except for her own opinions, but she is a notable <s>gossip<\/s> <s>reporter<\/s> <redacted>, so her opinions may be notable as opinions, provided that don't mention ''facts'' about living persons.  \u2014  +++$+++ I agree that Mayer is not a reliable source except for her own opinions, but she is a notable <s>gossip</s> <s>reporter</s> <redacted>, so her opinions may be notable as opinions, provided that don't mention ''facts'' about living persons.  — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]]  [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 06:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
5876 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5875 +++$+++ 5875 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.296100800E09 +++$+++ I don't see how her opinion is notable in this situation.  It seems more like those that don't like Koch think her opinion is notable because it furthers a rumor against Koch.  To me this looks like a classic BLP violation.  We should not be feeding speculative rumors about anyone.   +++$+++ :I don't see how her opinion is notable in this situation.  It seems more like those that don't like Koch think her opinion is notable because it furthers a rumor against Koch.  To me this looks like a classic BLP violation.  We should not be feeding speculative rumors about anyone.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 20:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

530164 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-17 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.237283160E09 +++$+++ I'm actually gobsmacked! :-O I'm not [[Lisa Hannigan]]'s biggest fan or anything but that's the ''fourth'' time I've submitted that image for a Lisa Hannigan-related DYK and, with three failures, thought it wouldn't stand a chance against the international [[Grammy Award]]-winning might of [[Sin\xe9ad O'Connor]]! Thank you! Also this will be the first time [[Talk:Lisa Hannigan|my own GA]] will be on the Main Page! :) She'll never get rid of the [[Damien Rice]] tag! :) --<span style=\"color:red\">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]<\/span> <sub>  +++$+++ I'm actually gobsmacked! :-O I'm not [[Lisa Hannigan]]'s biggest fan or anything but that's the ''fourth'' time I've submitted that image for a Lisa Hannigan-related DYK and, with three failures, thought it wouldn't stand a chance against the international [[Grammy Award]]-winning might of [[Sinéad O'Connor]]! Thank you! Also this will be the first time [[Talk:Lisa Hannigan|my own GA]] will be on the Main Page! :) She'll never get rid of the [[Damien Rice]] tag! :) --<span style="color:red">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]</span> <sub> [[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<big><u>S</u></big>]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Candlewicke|<big><u>T</u></big>]] </sup><sub>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:# :);color:green;"></span>|<span style="color:green;"># :)</span>}} </sub> 02:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
530165 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530164 +++$+++ 530164 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.237284300E09 +++$+++ Wow, again I'm amazed. I thought she was off my radar as some sort of international superstar who would have plenty of Americans and others willing to bring to GA status. I may have to do that in future... crybaby because of [[Nothing Compares 2 U|that video]] that made her big outside her own country? --<span style=\"color:red\">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]<\/span> <sub>  +++$+++ :Wow, again I'm amazed. I thought she was off my radar as some sort of international superstar who would have plenty of Americans and others willing to bring to GA status. I may have to do that in future... crybaby because of [[Nothing Compares 2 U|that video]] that made her big outside her own country? --<span style="color:red">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]</span> <sub> [[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<big><u>S</u></big>]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Candlewicke|<big><u>T</u></big>]] </sup><sub>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:# :);color:green;"></span>|<span style="color:green;"># :)</span>}} </sub> 03:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
530166 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530164 +++$+++ 530165 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.237285320E09 +++$+++ I would think she is known more here for (apart from her music) her declarations of lesbianism plus religious matters. Strangely enough I found myself in the same room as [[John Waters (columnist)|the father]] of one of her children this day last week... --<span style=\"color:red\">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]<\/span> <sub>  +++$+++ ::I would think she is known more here for (apart from her music) her declarations of lesbianism plus religious matters. Strangely enough I found myself in the same room as [[John Waters (columnist)|the father]] of one of her children this day last week... --<span style="color:red">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]</span> <sub> [[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<big><u>S</u></big>]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Candlewicke|<big><u>T</u></big>]] </sup><sub>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:# :);color:green;"></span>|<span style="color:green;"># :)</span>}} </sub> 03:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

5877 +++$+++ Jesanj +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5877 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.296183240E09 +++$+++ for the recent revert at [[death panel]]. it appears that editor is out of control.  +++$+++ for the recent revert at [[death panel]]. it appears that editor is out of control. [[User:Jesanj|Jesanj]] ([[User talk:Jesanj|talk]]) 18:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
5878 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5877 +++$+++ 5877 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.296216720E09 +++$+++ That is probably putting it lightly.   +++$+++ :That is probably putting it lightly.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 04:12, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

268022 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-23 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.206270420E09 +++$+++ Mattisse ... considering our recent and heated feud that has been taking place for several weeks ... '''I do find it questionable for you to now having taken ''interest'' in all of the articles that I have recently worked on.''' After not editing any of these articles ever before. Now sure every editor on wikipedia has the right to work on whichever article they wish ... and you could truly be interested in improving the quality of \"coincidentally\" the same articles that I recently worked on ''(even though the probability of such an occurrence would be very low)'' --- thus it leads me to question your true genuineness of criticisms and critiques. Going through and excessively tagging every photo on every article I have worked on, along with POV tags, tone tags, length, tags etc ''(as if you are an administrator, which you are not)'' could be warranted ... but they could also be an example of an attempt to create \"annoyance\". One that an administrator already warned you about this past week. I hope this is not the case, and that your motives are collaborative and not destructive. I would also contend that because of our past and very heated rivalry ... that it may be best for you not to mirror all of my edits, as you are already aware of our personal feud which as history shows us both, usually creates unnecessary frustration for the both of us.  +++$+++ Mattisse ... considering our recent and heated feud that has been taking place for several weeks ... '''I do find it questionable for you to now having taken ''interest'' in all of the articles that I have recently worked on.''' After not editing any of these articles ever before. Now sure every editor on wikipedia has the right to work on whichever article they wish ... and you could truly be interested in improving the quality of "coincidentally" the same articles that I recently worked on ''(even though the probability of such an occurrence would be very low)'' --- thus it leads me to question your true genuineness of criticisms and critiques. Going through and excessively tagging every photo on every article I have worked on, along with POV tags, tone tags, length, tags etc ''(as if you are an administrator, which you are not)'' could be warranted ... but they could also be an example of an attempt to create "annoyance". One that an administrator already warned you about this past week. I hope this is not the case, and that your motives are collaborative and not destructive. I would also contend that because of our past and very heated rivalry ... that it may be best for you not to mirror all of my edits, as you are already aware of our personal feud which as history shows us both, usually creates unnecessary frustration for the both of us. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]]TR 04:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
268023 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268022 +++$+++ 268022 +++$+++ 2008-03-23 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.206270840E09 +++$+++ I disagree. This is not the same as when you followed me around and posted remarks that could be considered personal attacks on me, calling me insane and quesioning my mental health. In the case of images, this is a legal issue. The specialists at Wikipedia who deal with copyright issue will decide. Wikipedia is attempting to avoid lawsuits so they scrutinize the Fair use rationale for copyrighted images. I had trouble getting record covers of the actual song I was writing about.  I question that there is a rationale that can justify the use of five  copyright images in one article on a filem.  Regards,   +++$+++ :I disagree. This is not the same as when you followed me around and posted remarks that could be considered personal attacks on me, calling me insane and quesioning my mental health. In the case of images, this is a legal issue. The specialists at Wikipedia who deal with copyright issue will decide. Wikipedia is attempting to avoid lawsuits so they scrutinize the Fair use rationale for copyrighted images. I had trouble getting record covers of the actual song I was writing about.  I question that there is a rationale that can justify the use of five  copyright images in one article on a filem.  Regards,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
268024 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268022 +++$+++ 268023 +++$+++ 2008-03-23 08:58:00 +++$+++ 1.206287880E09 +++$+++ In the interest of fairness, will you hold the same position if I \"suddenly\" become interested in finding things to tag in all of the articles you have created or worked on?  +++$+++ ::In the interest of fairness, will you hold the same position if I "suddenly" become interested in finding things to tag in all of the articles you have created or worked on? [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 08:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
268025 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268022 +++$+++ 268024 +++$+++ 2008-03-23 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.206310260E09 +++$+++ Sure. You can start here [[User:Mattisse\/Articles I created]]. Many of these can used help and many have been messed up since I created them. It would be helpful if you would look through them for any problems.  Thanks!   +++$+++ :::Sure. You can start here [[User:Mattisse/Articles I created]]. Many of these can used help and many have been messed up since I created them. It would be helpful if you would look through them for any problems.  Thanks!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

5879 +++$+++ Hauskalainen +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5879 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-28 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.296208560E09 +++$+++ If we move the \"death panel\" argument away from what Palin was talking about (a board set up to euthanise people when they are deemed to have no remaining value to society) to some things which do real good such as bodies which try to help patients by making sure that their doctor is using best available practice and not wasting their money paying for things which yield poor value, then surely we have to include the real death panels that really do kill people. I think we have a reliable source that got its judgment spot on. The U.S. may not get to pull the plug on grandma but it surely does insert the plug for Old Sparky to kill some people (or via hypodermic needle or whatever the current fashion is). Of the 34 members of the OECD, only the US and Japan still uses the barbaric practice of legal executions. +++$+++ If we move the "death panel" argument away from what Palin was talking about (a board set up to euthanise people when they are deemed to have no remaining value to society) to some things which do real good such as bodies which try to help patients by making sure that their doctor is using best available practice and not wasting their money paying for things which yield poor value, then surely we have to include the real death panels that really do kill people. I think we have a reliable source that got its judgment spot on. The U.S. may not get to pull the plug on grandma but it surely does insert the plug for Old Sparky to kill some people (or via hypodermic needle or whatever the current fashion is). Of the 34 members of the OECD, only the US and Japan still uses the barbaric practice of legal executions.[[User:Hauskalainen|Hauskalainen]] ([[User talk:Hauskalainen|talk]]) 01:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
5880 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5879 +++$+++ 5879 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.296216960E09 +++$+++ Don't even try to validate such absurd logic.  It is clear you have a strong agenda to push, and WP is not the place to do so.   +++$+++ :Don't even try to validate such absurd logic.  It is clear you have a strong agenda to push, and WP is not the place to do so.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 04:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
5881 +++$+++ Hauskalainen +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5879 +++$+++ 5880 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.296218340E09 +++$+++ what absurd logic? That the American Justice system kills people? That NICE does not kill people? It seems perfectly logical to me! Arzel, it is not me that has an agenda to push, it is you.  And I can demonstrate it with many examples. +++$+++ ::what absurd logic? That the American Justice system kills people? That NICE does not kill people? It seems perfectly logical to me! Arzel, it is not me that has an agenda to push, it is you.  And I can demonstrate it with many examples.[[User:Hauskalainen|Hauskalainen]] ([[User talk:Hauskalainen|talk]]) 04:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
5882 +++$+++ Hauskalainen +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5879 +++$+++ 5881 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.296489960E09 +++$+++ You seem to be saying that the American people would choose 1 and 2 in droves and reject 3, and I would say the complete opposite. I have to say, I don't share your lack of faith in the judgment of the American people.  +++$+++ :::You seem to be saying that the American people would choose 1 and 2 in droves and reject 3, and I would say the complete opposite. I have to say, I don't share your lack of faith in the judgment of the American people. [[User:Hauskalainen|Hauskalainen]] ([[User talk:Hauskalainen|talk]]) 08:06, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
5883 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5879 +++$+++ 5882 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.296514440E09 +++$+++ I don't share your obtuseness.  \"Death Panel\" as it relates to healthcare is a metaphor.  It is nothing like a jury deciding on the guilt of someone that would be sentenced to death.   +++$+++ ::::I don't share your obtuseness.  "Death Panel" as it relates to healthcare is a metaphor.  It is nothing like a jury deciding on the guilt of someone that would be sentenced to death.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 14:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
5884 +++$+++ Hauskalainen +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5879 +++$+++ 5883 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.296575160E09 +++$+++ That is your opinion. Not everyone will share it. I think I'd be sitting on a death panel if a decision of mine could lead someone to someone's death. +++$+++ :::::That is your opinion. Not everyone will share it. I think I'd be sitting on a death panel if a decision of mine could lead someone to someone's death.[[User:Hauskalainen|Hauskalainen]] ([[User talk:Hauskalainen|talk]]) 07:46, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

394196 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ Poiuyt Man +++$+++ 394196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.199285940E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 06:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
394197 +++$+++ Poiuytman +++$+++ Poiuyt Man +++$+++ 394196 +++$+++ 394196 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.199359860E09 +++$+++ Hmm... I didn't upload this picture.  +++$+++ :Hmm... I didn't upload this picture. [[User:Poiuytman|Poiuyt Man]] [[User talk:Poiuytman|<sup>talk</sup>]] 03:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

268026 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268026 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-23 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.206321600E09 +++$+++ I see that you are passing through tough times at wiki. In fact I am passing through the same in my practical life. My father in law is severely ill and hospitalized. Provably he is suffering from Polycythemia Vera, a rare blood disease. Though I don't feel much appetite for scientific efforts in this situation, I want to continue my intellectual responsibilities. So I am going to ask you very humbly, will you please finish the primary editing of the article? If you are stuck due to any reason, please let me know. But I believe and trust that you have the capacity to continue and finish. I believe your last approach was on the 16th March. Forgive me for giving you such troubles. +++$+++ I see that you are passing through tough times at wiki. In fact I am passing through the same in my practical life. My father in law is severely ill and hospitalized. Provably he is suffering from Polycythemia Vera, a rare blood disease. Though I don't feel much appetite for scientific efforts in this situation, I want to continue my intellectual responsibilities. So I am going to ask you very humbly, will you please finish the primary editing of the article? If you are stuck due to any reason, please let me know. But I believe and trust that you have the capacity to continue and finish. I believe your last approach was on the 16th March. Forgive me for giving you such troubles.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 18:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
268027 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268026 +++$+++ 268026 +++$+++ 2008-03-23 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.206323640E09 +++$+++ I am sorry for your situation as I too could sense the change in your mood, as you did mine. When you \"primary editing of the article\", do you mean the one I was working on recently? I was having a problem understanding the last part of the article, but if you wish, I will plow through as best I can.   +++$+++ :I am sorry for your situation as I too could sense the change in your mood, as you did mine. When you "primary editing of the article", do you mean the one I was working on recently? I was having a problem understanding the last part of the article, but if you wish, I will plow through as best I can.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
268028 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268026 +++$+++ 268027 +++$+++ 2008-03-23 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.206324000E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, my friend please do not take me wrong. Actually I feel too sad cos my wife has lost her two brothers and one son. Now his father is ill with such problem. I don't know how much I can do for her. My friend do for the articles as much as you can till the last parts. Then, with your permission, I might work further. The first article ends first and if there is any scope then the second article can go. All the best wishes for you. +++$+++ :: Mattisse, my friend please do not take me wrong. Actually I feel too sad cos my wife has lost her two brothers and one son. Now his father is ill with such problem. I don't know how much I can do for her. My friend do for the articles as much as you can till the last parts. Then, with your permission, I might work further. The first article ends first and if there is any scope then the second article can go. All the best wishes for you.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 19:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

568959 +++$+++ Autarch +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-18 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.161205800E09 +++$+++ Sorry about the bio, but I'd seen his contribute to USENET quite a few times over the years, so I decided to add him. I guess I hadn't added enough for even a stub.  +++$+++ Sorry about the bio, but I'd seen his contribute to USENET quite a few times over the years, so I decided to add him. I guess I hadn't added enough for even a stub. [[User:Autarch|Autarch]] 14:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
568960 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568959 +++$+++ 568959 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.161211140E09 +++$+++ Hello!  You are correct the biography of the subject as it stood was not enough to assert their notability.  The guidelines for a notable biography can be found at [[WP:BIO]], linked in my original communication. If you feel that you have a subject that is sufficiently notable to pass these guidelines then I suggest that you a) gather together [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]]; b) create a [[WP:USERPAGE|user sub-page]] to develop your article and c) have another editor review your work before publication in order to improve it. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello!  You are correct the biography of the subject as it stood was not enough to assert their notability.  The guidelines for a notable biography can be found at [[WP:BIO]], linked in my original communication. If you feel that you have a subject that is sufficiently notable to pass these guidelines then I suggest that you a) gather together [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]]; b) create a [[WP:USERPAGE|user sub-page]] to develop your article and c) have another editor review your work before publication in order to improve it. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 15:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

5885 +++$+++ SeanNovack +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-02 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.296714900E09 +++$+++ {{WPUS Invite}}  +++$+++ {{WPUS Invite}} [[User:SeanNovack|Rapier]] ([[User talk:SeanNovack|talk]]) 22:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
5886 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5885 +++$+++ 5885 +++$+++ 2011-02-05 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.296947460E09 +++$+++ Hi Sean.  Thanks for the invite and info.   +++$+++ :Hi Sean.  Thanks for the invite and info.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 15:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
5887 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5885 +++$+++ 5885 +++$+++ 2011-02-05 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.296949620E09 +++$+++ Welcome to the project. -- +++$+++ :Welcome to the project. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 15:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

471564 +++$+++ Stone +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-11 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.186866240E09 +++$+++ I came across him by the Baeyer page, where somebody changed the link from Perkin to Perkin Jr. I am interested in chemists and I updated some of the noble prize chemists and german chemists. I downloaded the two refs and will also upgrade the article soon! The ref is really nice discribing the time in munich with baeyer and that Perkin suffered from the lack of interest of Baeyer in musk and the opera. But e also learned a lot and started a life log friendship with Baeyer. His upgrade of the laboratory in Manchester similar to those builtby Baeyer in Munich boosted the chemistry department to first league. It says also that his work on small ring systems added proof to the ring strain concept of Baeyer. Also that long after his death the british chemists said that he was one of the chemists good enough to get the Noble Prize but never got it!-- +++$+++ I came across him by the Baeyer page, where somebody changed the link from Perkin to Perkin Jr. I am interested in chemists and I updated some of the noble prize chemists and german chemists. I downloaded the two refs and will also upgrade the article soon! The ref is really nice discribing the time in munich with baeyer and that Perkin suffered from the lack of interest of Baeyer in musk and the opera. But e also learned a lot and started a life log friendship with Baeyer. His upgrade of the laboratory in Manchester similar to those builtby Baeyer in Munich boosted the chemistry department to first league. It says also that his work on small ring systems added proof to the ring strain concept of Baeyer. Also that long after his death the british chemists said that he was one of the chemists good enough to get the Noble Prize but never got it!--[[User:Stone|Stone]] 14:04, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
471565 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471564 +++$+++ 471564 +++$+++ 2007-08-11 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.186897260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply. Sounds great. If you can source the \"didn't get it but was considered good enough for Nobel\", and expand it more than I have done, then it might be possible to put it forward for [[Wikipedia:Did you know?]].  +++$+++ :Thanks for the reply. Sounds great. If you can source the "didn't get it but was considered good enough for Nobel", and expand it more than I have done, then it might be possible to put it forward for [[Wikipedia:Did you know?]]. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 22:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

268031 +++$+++ Insanity Incarnate +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-25 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.206509040E09 +++$+++ I've noticed that at least three times, you have added the text of [[Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale]] to image pages. You should know, if you haven't figured it out already, that the way you are doing this is not really the correct way to do it, and it causes a small problem. When you make edits like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image:MD2.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=200224616 this one], you appear to be copying the code directly from the template's source. This causes the image page to be added to [[:Category:Image copyright tags]] (a category for the template, not the image). This can be prevented by [[transclusion]] (using the code <code><nowiki>{{template}}<\/nowiki><\/code>) or [[WP:SUBST|substitution]] (using the code <code><nowiki>{{subst:template}}<\/nowiki><\/code>). For the effect you were looking for, you should have used [[substitution]] with these templates\u2014it adds the code of the templates, without anything in <code>&lt;noinclude><\/code> tags, which is the difference between your method and substitution, and which is the source of the problem. I've fixed this problem at [[:Image:MD2.jpg]] and [[:Image:MD4.jpg]]. Actually, if I were you, I would use transclusion, because that method looks neater in the code and is easier to modify or remove. (Also, just so you know: I fixed a link on this talk page which was putting it into [[:Category:Child abuse]]\u2014it was missing a colon.) \u2014 <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ I've noticed that at least three times, you have added the text of [[Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale]] to image pages. You should know, if you haven't figured it out already, that the way you are doing this is not really the correct way to do it, and it causes a small problem. When you make edits like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:MD2.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=200224616 this one], you appear to be copying the code directly from the template's source. This causes the image page to be added to [[:Category:Image copyright tags]] (a category for the template, not the image). This can be prevented by [[transclusion]] (using the code <code><nowiki>{{template}}</nowiki></code>) or [[WP:SUBST|substitution]] (using the code <code><nowiki>{{subst:template}}</nowiki></code>). For the effect you were looking for, you should have used [[substitution]] with these templates—it adds the code of the templates, without anything in <code>&lt;noinclude></code> tags, which is the difference between your method and substitution, and which is the source of the problem. I've fixed this problem at [[:Image:MD2.jpg]] and [[:Image:MD4.jpg]]. Actually, if I were you, I would use transclusion, because that method looks neater in the code and is easier to modify or remove. (Also, just so you know: I fixed a link on this talk page which was putting it into [[:Category:Child abuse]]—it was missing a colon.) — <font color="blue">[[User:Insanity Incarnate|Insanity Incarnat]]</font><font color="green">[[User talk:Insanity Incarnate|e]]</font> 22:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
268032 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268031 +++$+++ 268031 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.206510300E09 +++$+++ I am truly sorry. I spent a lot of time trying to figure out how to to that and I could not. None of the ones I stashed away worked.   Finally, I think I copied someone else's template message. I will add your suggestions to my template page. The difference between the two methods I do not really understand. I guess you are saying I transcluded  and I should have substituted? I  looked through all the templates  and ended up using the only one I could get to work - and even there I copied.  I don't know what transclusion is, although I have read the wikipedia pages on all that. Sorry about the missing colon. I will try to understand more, but it may be hopeless in my case. This is why I am so helpless at wikipedia, and after two years still have not successfully formated a 3RR complaint even once! Regards,   +++$+++ :I am truly sorry. I spent a lot of time trying to figure out how to to that and I could not. None of the ones I stashed away worked.   Finally, I think I copied someone else's template message. I will add your suggestions to my template page. The difference between the two methods I do not really understand. I guess you are saying I transcluded  and I should have substituted? I  looked through all the templates  and ended up using the only one I could get to work - and even there I copied.  I don't know what transclusion is, although I have read the wikipedia pages on all that. Sorry about the missing colon. I will try to understand more, but it may be hopeless in my case. This is why I am so helpless at wikipedia, and after two years still have not successfully formated a 3RR complaint even once! Regards,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
268033 +++$+++ Insanity Incarnate +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268031 +++$+++ 268032 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.206532440E09 +++$+++ I very much hope that I've helped you with this. (Re-)read [[Wikipedia:Template namespace]], and experiment in your sandbox with some actual templates. Ask me if you're still confused or have any other questions. \u2014 <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ ::I very much hope that I've helped you with this. (Re-)read [[Wikipedia:Template namespace]], and experiment in your sandbox with some actual templates. Ask me if you're still confused or have any other questions. — <font color="blue">[[User:Insanity Incarnate|Insanity Incarnat]]</font><font color="green">[[User talk:Insanity Incarnate|e]]</font> 04:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

530176 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530176 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-18 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.237371000E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid that Lisa, despite being nominated in two categories, could not even [http:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/newspaper\/breaking\/2009\/0317\/breaking45.htm win] an award at [[Meteor Music Awards|her own country's national music awards]] a [[2009 Meteor Awards|number of hours]] ago. :( --<span style=\"color:red\">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]<\/span> <sub>  +++$+++ I'm afraid that Lisa, despite being nominated in two categories, could not even [http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2009/0317/breaking45.htm win] an award at [[Meteor Music Awards|her own country's national music awards]] a [[2009 Meteor Awards|number of hours]] ago. :( --<span style="color:red">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]</span> <sub> [[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<big><u>S</u></big>]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Candlewicke|<big><u>T</u></big>]] </sup><sub>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:# :);color:green;"></span>|<span style="color:green;"># :)</span>}} </sub> 03:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
530177 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530176 +++$+++ 530176 +++$+++ 2009-03-18 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.237371060E09 +++$+++ Oh, well. A nom is better than no noms! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Oh, well. A nom is better than no noms! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:11, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
530178 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530176 +++$+++ 530177 +++$+++ 2009-03-18 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.237371180E09 +++$+++ True. Three noms actually if you count the [[Choice Music Prize]] she lost to [[Jape (band)|Jape]] a few weeks ago. :) --<span style=\"color:red\">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]<\/span> <sub>  +++$+++ ::True. Three noms actually if you count the [[Choice Music Prize]] she lost to [[Jape (band)|Jape]] a few weeks ago. :) --<span style="color:red">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]</span> <sub> [[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<big><u>S</u></big>]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Candlewicke|<big><u>T</u></big>]] </sup><sub>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:# :);color:green;"></span>|<span style="color:green;"># :)</span>}} </sub> 03:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

5890 +++$+++ AnonMoos +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-27 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.298859000E09 +++$+++ What possible violation could it be of BLP to mention the widely-reported fact that the pranker impersonated David H. Koch?  Don't want to sound rude, but this seems like very strange reasoning...  +++$+++ What possible violation could it be of BLP to mention the widely-reported fact that the pranker impersonated David H. Koch?  Don't want to sound rude, but this seems like very strange reasoning... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 18:10, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
5891 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5890 +++$+++ 5890 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.298887500E09 +++$+++ Walkers responses to Murphy's baited questions under the guise of impersonating a living person while recording the conversation would be easily presented out of context.  I am not saying that the event can't be reported, but reporting quotes from Walker under these circumstances may not be entirely neutral.  The responses that Walker made were certainly not obtained under good faith of any kind.  This was a form of entrapment by Walker.  I just don't think we should quote walker from these highly questionable tactics.   +++$+++ :Walkers responses to Murphy's baited questions under the guise of impersonating a living person while recording the conversation would be easily presented out of context.  I am not saying that the event can't be reported, but reporting quotes from Walker under these circumstances may not be entirely neutral.  The responses that Walker made were certainly not obtained under good faith of any kind.  This was a form of entrapment by Walker.  I just don't think we should quote walker from these highly questionable tactics.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 02:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
5892 +++$+++ AnonMoos +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5890 +++$+++ 5891 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.298894940E09 +++$+++ However, in your edit summaries, you seemed to be claiming that mentioning the name of impersonee David H. Koch would be a BLP -- something which unfortunately makes very little sense (if any).  +++$+++ ::However, in your edit summaries, you seemed to be claiming that mentioning the name of impersonee David H. Koch would be a BLP -- something which unfortunately makes very little sense (if any). [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 04:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
5893 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5890 +++$+++ 5892 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.298901480E09 +++$+++ Little confused.  I have not made any mention of Koch during my recent edits summaries.  However I do try to make concise points in my edit summaries since they are limited, it is possible that my summary is not as clear as I intended.  You will have to help me out and point to those which you are referring.   +++$+++ :::Little confused.  I have not made any mention of Koch during my recent edits summaries.  However I do try to make concise points in my edit summaries since they are limited, it is possible that my summary is not as clear as I intended.  You will have to help me out and point to those which you are referring.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 05:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

268035 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-26 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.206579900E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, my dear friend, after 10 hours from now my father in law will be transferred to the super-specialized hospital and I may not be able to be on internet for a while. You work a lot and also I count on you and your patience. I marked that, in the discussion portion of your talk page I added a section with the heading \"Wow\" in which a very important document in support of my works has been copied. I understand that very shortly it will be archived if only one or two messages are added to your talk page. As I will be busy keeping my father in law safe and away from internet, it will be best if you keep the review report in the \"Wow\" portion which will be most helpful for the \"Death and adjustment hypotheses\" article (the second article you approached), but it might be useful for the first article (on which you are working mostly) \"Concept of death and adjustment\" too. Forgive me for pressing you but it is very understandable that a busy editor like you may be lost in other works very easily. I will be very grateful if the two articles mentioned above are edited by you. The review report in the Wow portion of your talk page is very valuable for any part of the world, cos, Death Studies, the Journal in which the report has been waiting in press is most likely the highest journal on death related research. I believe I will see some progress when I'll be back. Forgive me for every annoying situation I'm creating for you. +++$+++ Mattisse, my dear friend, after 10 hours from now my father in law will be transferred to the super-specialized hospital and I may not be able to be on internet for a while. You work a lot and also I count on you and your patience. I marked that, in the discussion portion of your talk page I added a section with the heading "Wow" in which a very important document in support of my works has been copied. I understand that very shortly it will be archived if only one or two messages are added to your talk page. As I will be busy keeping my father in law safe and away from internet, it will be best if you keep the review report in the "Wow" portion which will be most helpful for the "Death and adjustment hypotheses" article (the second article you approached), but it might be useful for the first article (on which you are working mostly) "Concept of death and adjustment" too. Forgive me for pressing you but it is very understandable that a busy editor like you may be lost in other works very easily. I will be very grateful if the two articles mentioned above are edited by you. The review report in the Wow portion of your talk page is very valuable for any part of the world, cos, Death Studies, the Journal in which the report has been waiting in press is most likely the highest journal on death related research. I believe I will see some progress when I'll be back. Forgive me for every annoying situation I'm creating for you.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 18:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
268036 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268035 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.206580680E09 +++$+++ You are not annoying me at all. Regarding the articls, I am not clear what you mean. Anything that gets archived will be safe there. Could you send me the specific links you are concerned about? You could put them in sandboxes on your user page. You can put anything there without criticism or worry that they will get deleted. Also, I am becoming confused between all the articles and where they are and what the priorities are for what you want done. I am so sorry to hear your news and understand the stress your must be under.  +++$+++ ::You are not annoying me at all. Regarding the articls, I am not clear what you mean. Anything that gets archived will be safe there. Could you send me the specific links you are concerned about? You could put them in sandboxes on your user page. You can put anything there without criticism or worry that they will get deleted. Also, I am becoming confused between all the articles and where they are and what the priorities are for what you want done. I am so sorry to hear your news and understand the stress your must be under. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
268037 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268035 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.206581460E09 +++$+++ Lets make it simple. I am connected with two articles at wiki. 1) Concept of Death and Adjustment and 2) Death and adjustment Hypotheses. Both of us trying to bring the articles to a shape more and more suitable for wiki. I am taking your help for editing those articles. You are mainly editing the no-1 article above, and also sometimes touching the no-2 too. In your talk page there is a discussion with the heading 'Wow'. '''Read it fully'''. You will get some comments from the famous journal Death studies and the comments are on my work. The comments will be printed after the fall of 2008, it is in waiting list to be published (printed). The journal authority has sent the final electronic copy to me so that I can use it for wiki and other place for references. Just type Death studies in the search box in any browser and you will be able to read about the journal. Even if you write to the editor he will be able to recall about my work and their report. I am just letting you know so that you can edit the articles with more confidence. Also as you have my very first book, it will help you edit the second article mentioned above. Is it clear now, my friend? +++$+++ ::: Lets make it simple. I am connected with two articles at wiki. 1) Concept of Death and Adjustment and 2) Death and adjustment Hypotheses. Both of us trying to bring the articles to a shape more and more suitable for wiki. I am taking your help for editing those articles. You are mainly editing the no-1 article above, and also sometimes touching the no-2 too. In your talk page there is a discussion with the heading 'Wow'. '''Read it fully'''. You will get some comments from the famous journal Death studies and the comments are on my work. The comments will be printed after the fall of 2008, it is in waiting list to be published (printed). The journal authority has sent the final electronic copy to me so that I can use it for wiki and other place for references. Just type Death studies in the search box in any browser and you will be able to read about the journal. Even if you write to the editor he will be able to recall about my work and their report. I am just letting you know so that you can edit the articles with more confidence. Also as you have my very first book, it will help you edit the second article mentioned above. Is it clear now, my friend?[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 18:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
268038 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268035 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.206582360E09 +++$+++ O.K. To read the Wow section, I will have to format it - I can't read a big block of text like that. But that is no problem. I can do that in a sandbox or even on the talk page edition.  I'll get going on it. (What takes me so long is that I can only do it when I have lard blocks of time to concentration on it -- usually I have frequent bits of small time for wikipedia.)   +++$+++ ::::O.K. To read the Wow section, I will have to format it - I can't read a big block of text like that. But that is no problem. I can do that in a sandbox or even on the talk page edition.  I'll get going on it. (What takes me so long is that I can only do it when I have lard blocks of time to concentration on it -- usually I have frequent bits of small time for wikipedia.)  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

5894 +++$+++ CartoonDiablo +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-02 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.299126180E09 +++$+++ At any rate, the idea that Nate Silver isn't a polling expert is factually false and if it would be a waste of time taking this dispute any further. -- +++$+++ At any rate, the idea that Nate Silver isn't a polling expert is factually false and if it would be a waste of time taking this dispute any further. --[[User:CartoonDiablo|CartoonDiablo]] ([[User talk:CartoonDiablo|talk]]) 20:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
5895 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5894 +++$+++ 5894 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.299147540E09 +++$+++ I think people that I know that actually are statisticians would take issue with him being called a statistician given he doesn't have an advanced degree which the profession is determined.  That said, he does have quite a bit of statistical knowledge.  However, understanding statistics is not the same as understanding the psychology regarding polling questions, and AFAIK he has never been classified as such.  His opinion of the statistical methodology may have some merit, but his knowledge of statistics does not make him an expert in polling questions anymore than it makes you an expert in polling questions.   +++$+++ :I think people that I know that actually are statisticians would take issue with him being called a statistician given he doesn't have an advanced degree which the profession is determined.  That said, he does have quite a bit of statistical knowledge.  However, understanding statistics is not the same as understanding the psychology regarding polling questions, and AFAIK he has never been classified as such.  His opinion of the statistical methodology may have some merit, but his knowledge of statistics does not make him an expert in polling questions anymore than it makes you an expert in polling questions.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 02:19, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
5896 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5894 +++$+++ 5895 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.299211980E09 +++$+++ Not having an advanced degree? So what? Neither did Francis Galton.  +++$+++ ::Not having an advanced degree? So what? Neither did Francis Galton. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 20:13, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

268039 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268039 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.206659460E09 +++$+++ Coppertwig is willing to provide a process for all editors to go through each section and provide their suggestions, rationale for dispute, etc. If you wish to be a part of that, then please participate and allow (the valuable experience I know you have) to be utilized. An incessant preoccupation with article statistics is not helpful (especially since 1 edit solely in #, can be everything from adding a comma, to erasing an entire paragraph.) I take you at your word that you want to create a better article, so let's use the process Coppertwig is creating to reach consensus on the content, in order to develop an improved article.  +++$+++ Coppertwig is willing to provide a process for all editors to go through each section and provide their suggestions, rationale for dispute, etc. If you wish to be a part of that, then please participate and allow (the valuable experience I know you have) to be utilized. An incessant preoccupation with article statistics is not helpful (especially since 1 edit solely in #, can be everything from adding a comma, to erasing an entire paragraph.) I take you at your word that you want to create a better article, so let's use the process Coppertwig is creating to reach consensus on the content, in order to develop an improved article. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 16:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
268040 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268039 +++$+++ 268039 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.206664500E09 +++$+++ Please do not make article comments on my talk page. Anything that pertains to [[Che Guevara]] should be posted on the article talk page. Therefore,  I am moving comments there where they belong.  +++$+++ :Please do not make article comments on my talk page. Anything that pertains to [[Che Guevara]] should be posted on the article talk page. Therefore,  I am moving comments there where they belong. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

5897 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5897 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-03 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.299212520E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 20:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
5898 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5897 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.299214140E09 +++$+++ Really? What country are you speaking of? In mine, you are wrong on both counts.   +++$+++ ::::Really? What country are you speaking of? In mine, you are wrong on both counts.  [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 20:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
5899 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5897 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.299221580E09 +++$+++ You may want to have a word with the US Department of Labor and tell them they don't know what they are talking about [http:\/\/www.bls.gov\/oco\/ocos045.htm#training here].  +++$+++ ::::::You may want to have a word with the US Department of Labor and tell them they don't know what they are talking about [http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos045.htm#training here]. [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 22:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
5900 +++$+++ Magog the Ogre +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5897 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.299218520E09 +++$+++ If I can step in here: Nate Silver is one of the top experts in the polling field. He's very very good at what he does, and only rarely mixes in political bias.  +++$+++ :::::If I can step in here: Nate Silver is one of the top experts in the polling field. He's very very good at what he does, and only rarely mixes in political bias. [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 22:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
5901 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5897 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.299221580E09 +++$+++ Understanding polling statistics is hardly the same as understanding polling question methodology.  I don't know of any evidence that Silver is an expert in polling question methodology, they usually have degrees in Psychology, Sociology, Behavior Sciences and the like.   +++$+++ ::::::Understanding polling statistics is hardly the same as understanding polling question methodology.  I don't know of any evidence that Silver is an expert in polling question methodology, they usually have degrees in Psychology, Sociology, Behavior Sciences and the like.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 22:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
5902 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5897 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.299226320E09 +++$+++ No, usually they have ''experience'', which he does; degrees in many fields consist of  listening to people with experience, especially in the applied social sciences. In any case, his argument is a claim of fact.   +++$+++ ::::::::No, usually they have ''experience'', which he does; degrees in many fields consist of  listening to people with experience, especially in the applied social sciences. In any case, his argument is a claim of fact.  [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 00:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
5903 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5897 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.299227340E09 +++$+++ So, since you agree with him it is a fact?  Ha.  If Silver had questioned the oversampling in the NYT poll (something that he actually should have the ability to do) I probably wouldn't question his bias.  However, he would rather criticize Rassmussen over quetion methodology (where he has shown no expertise)...so forgive me if fail to find any merit to your arguement.   +++$+++ :::::::::So, since you agree with him it is a fact?  Ha.  If Silver had questioned the oversampling in the NYT poll (something that he actually should have the ability to do) I probably wouldn't question his bias.  However, he would rather criticize Rassmussen over quetion methodology (where he has shown no expertise)...so forgive me if fail to find any merit to your arguement.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 00:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
5904 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5897 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.299228360E09 +++$+++ I do not forgive you;  I said \"claim of fact\" - an unsubtle distinction. Nor do I acknowledge your expertise - even in this dubious environment, you do not appear to meet your own standard.  +++$+++ :::::::I do not forgive you;  I said "claim of fact" - an unsubtle distinction. Nor do I acknowledge your expertise - even in this dubious environment, you do not appear to meet your own standard. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 00:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
5905 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5897 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.299309720E09 +++$+++ I should have expected you to ignore my statement and a level minor personal attack...how very progressive of you.   +++$+++ ::::::::I should have expected you to ignore my statement and a level minor personal attack...how very progressive of you.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 23:22, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

525271 +++$+++ Dozenist +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-02 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.175503740E09 +++$+++ Hey, I notice you do quite a few edits concerning anatomy, and so this would be a perfect question to someone who knows a lot about anatomy-related articles.  On the [[tooth]] article, I have written a substantial amount of information, and I finally have gotten to the \"teeth in animals\" section and started wondering what I should do.  Should there be a separate \"teeth in animals\" article that the section should show as the main article or should the majority of the content in the tooth article be moved to a \"human tooth\" article?  What do you think?  My initial instinct was to keep the article as is and make a new article about animal teeth for the section to refer to, but I did not know if most anatomy articles try to keep a certain format when addressing that issue.  Your input would be appreciated. -  +++$+++ Hey, I notice you do quite a few edits concerning anatomy, and so this would be a perfect question to someone who knows a lot about anatomy-related articles.  On the [[tooth]] article, I have written a substantial amount of information, and I finally have gotten to the "teeth in animals" section and started wondering what I should do.  Should there be a separate "teeth in animals" article that the section should show as the main article or should the majority of the content in the tooth article be moved to a "human tooth" article?  What do you think?  My initial instinct was to keep the article as is and make a new article about animal teeth for the section to refer to, but I did not know if most anatomy articles try to keep a certain format when addressing that issue.  Your input would be appreciated. - [[User:Dozenist|Dozenist]] <font color="darkgreen" size="1">[[User talk:Dozenist|talk]]</font> 01:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
525272 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525271 +++$+++ 525271 +++$+++ 2007-04-02 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.175505240E09 +++$+++ I'd recommend splitting out most of the content to [[human tooth]] or [[human teeth]] (singular is usually better, but this might be an exception). I don't think that it is necessary to split out human content on most anatomy articles yet, but for articles with significant non-human content, I think this approach would help provide the best balance -- see [[lung]] and [[human lung]]. But there isn't strong precedent yet, so you might also want to post at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Dentistry]] to get a broader perspective. (If a veterinary medicine project exists, I can't find it.) -- +++$+++ :I'd recommend splitting out most of the content to [[human tooth]] or [[human teeth]] (singular is usually better, but this might be an exception). I don't think that it is necessary to split out human content on most anatomy articles yet, but for articles with significant non-human content, I think this approach would help provide the best balance -- see [[lung]] and [[human lung]]. But there isn't strong precedent yet, so you might also want to post at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Dentistry]] to get a broader perspective. (If a veterinary medicine project exists, I can't find it.) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 02:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
525273 +++$+++ Dozenist +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525271 +++$+++ 525272 +++$+++ 2007-04-02 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.175510460E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I will ask [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy]] just in case before I do such a drastic move. -  +++$+++ ::Thanks.  I will ask [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy]] just in case before I do such a drastic move. - [[User:Dozenist|Dozenist]] <font color="darkgreen" size="1">[[User talk:Dozenist|talk]]</font> 03:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

530190 +++$+++ Boston +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530190 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-20 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.237543200E09 +++$+++ Please read the template you deleted! -- +++$+++ Please read the template you deleted! --[[User:Boston|Boston]] ([[User talk:Boston|talk]]) 03:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
530191 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530190 +++$+++ 530190 +++$+++ 2009-03-20 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.237543740E09 +++$+++ I'm in the middle of updating DYK right now. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I'm in the middle of updating DYK right now. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
530192 +++$+++ Boston +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530190 +++$+++ 530191 +++$+++ 2009-03-20 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.237545120E09 +++$+++ There is a ''[[Massage|message]]'' for you on my talk page. -- +++$+++ :*There is a ''[[Massage|message]]'' for you on my talk page. --[[User:Boston|Boston]] ([[User talk:Boston|talk]]) 03:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

481581 +++$+++  +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ 481581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-28 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.180353300E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For beating me to the [[WP:TYPO|spelling correction]] three times today, I award you this barnstar.  Use it well! [[User:G1ggy|<font color=\"green\">'''G1'''<\/font>]][[User_talk:G1ggy|<font color=\"red\">'''gg'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For beating me to the [[WP:TYPO|spelling correction]] three times today, I award you this barnstar.  Use it well! [[User:G1ggy|<font color="green">'''G1'''</font>]][[User_talk:G1ggy|<font color="red">'''gg'''</font>]][[User:G1ggy/Contribs|<font color="blue">'''y'''</font>]][[WP:Finger|<font color="black">'''!'''</font>]] 04:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
481582 +++$+++  +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ 481581 +++$+++ 481581 +++$+++ 2007-05-28 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.180419540E09 +++$+++ Hey, speaking of which, what tool do you use for spelling checking?  Lupin's, or something else? [[User:G1ggy|<font color=\"green\">'''G1'''<\/font>]][[User_talk:G1ggy|<font color=\"red\">'''gg'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Hey, speaking of which, what tool do you use for spelling checking?  Lupin's, or something else? [[User:G1ggy|<font color="green">'''G1'''</font>]][[User_talk:G1ggy|<font color="red">'''gg'''</font>]][[User:G1ggy/Contribs|<font color="blue">'''y'''</font>]][[WP:Finger|<font color="black">'''!'''</font>]] 23:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

5906 +++$+++ Magog the Ogre +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-05 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.299338100E09 +++$+++ {{unindent}}Uh, [[WP:OR]] disallows us to use your expertise regardless.  +++$+++ {{unindent}}Uh, [[WP:OR]] disallows us to use your expertise regardless. [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 07:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
5907 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5906 +++$+++ 5906 +++$+++ 2011-03-05 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.299380340E09 +++$+++ I don't believe I was using my expertise to say that Silver is unqualified to discuss statistical aspects.  I have only said that he is not an expert in polling question methodology and there is no evidence to point to the contrary.  Understanding statistical methodology is not the same as understanding polling question methodology.    +++$+++ :I don't believe I was using my expertise to say that Silver is unqualified to discuss statistical aspects.  I have only said that he is not an expert in polling question methodology and there is no evidence to point to the contrary.  Understanding statistical methodology is not the same as understanding polling question methodology.   [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 18:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

44675 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-30 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.304223060E09 +++$+++ I would like you to take a look at [[User:MichaelQSchmidt\/Jonathan Keltz]].  There was an article about this fellow that was sent to AFD in January 2010.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Jonathan_Keltz]  As I myself commented back then, I felt that while the fellow might be seen to meet [[WP:ENT]], there was simply not enough reliable coverage at that time upon which to build a decent BLP.  That has changed. In the intervening 14 months, the fellow has received growing coverage and recognition he lacked originally. And with the new coverage, available only since the deletion,[http:\/\/news.google.com\/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2010&as_user_hdate=2011&q=%22Jonathan+Keltz%22&scoring=a&q=%22Jonathan+Keltz%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go] I feel it benefits the project to have this new version of the article return to mainspace to further grow and be expanded.  No point to a DRV, as there was no flaw in the reasoning for original deletion... but what I have built is not the same as the article that was deleted, and this due to actor's career and coverage not sitting still over the last 14 months.  I seek your approval in its return AND in it not being mistakenly speedied as a G4 recreation. ''' +++$+++ I would like you to take a look at [[User:MichaelQSchmidt/Jonathan Keltz]].  There was an article about this fellow that was sent to AFD in January 2010.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonathan_Keltz]  As I myself commented back then, I felt that while the fellow might be seen to meet [[WP:ENT]], there was simply not enough reliable coverage at that time upon which to build a decent BLP.  That has changed. In the intervening 14 months, the fellow has received growing coverage and recognition he lacked originally. And with the new coverage, available only since the deletion,[http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2010&as_user_hdate=2011&q=%22Jonathan+Keltz%22&scoring=a&q=%22Jonathan+Keltz%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go] I feel it benefits the project to have this new version of the article return to mainspace to further grow and be expanded.  No point to a DRV, as there was no flaw in the reasoning for original deletion... but what I have built is not the same as the article that was deleted, and this due to actor's career and coverage not sitting still over the last 14 months.  I seek your approval in its return AND in it not being mistakenly speedied as a G4 recreation. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 21:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
44676 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44675 +++$+++ 44675 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.304235420E09 +++$+++ Looks fairly shaky, IMO. Yeah, lots of sources with big names, but they are used to cite... roles. Is he notable? Under [[WP:ENT]], I'd say no way: the two roles he's supposedly best known for are minor roles that aren't mentioned in the plot descriptions of the main articles. No presumption of notability there. This leaves substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. Based on what is currently sourced in the article, I don't see it. -  +++$+++ :Looks fairly shaky, IMO. Yeah, lots of sources with big names, but they are used to cite... roles. Is he notable? Under [[WP:ENT]], I'd say no way: the two roles he's supposedly best known for are minor roles that aren't mentioned in the plot descriptions of the main articles. No presumption of notability there. This leaves substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. Based on what is currently sourced in the article, I don't see it. - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 00:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
44677 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44675 +++$+++ 44676 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.304252640E09 +++$+++ But as I do believe Keltze  \"has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions,\"  has himself specifically been written about in context to his roles in ''[[Entourage (TV series)|Entourage]]'' and ''[[Prom (film)|Prom]]'', and as there are '''1.''' other sources available for expansion and sourcing, and '''2.''' a reasonable expectation that the upcoming releases of ''[[Playback (film)|Playback]]'' and ''[[Transgression (2011 film)|Transgression]]''[http:\/\/www.timescolonist.com\/entertainment\/Jonathan+Keltz+born\/4685666\/story.html] (new articles likely on the horizon), perhaps it might be conceded that we have ''just'' enough to allow it to remain and be expanded in due course of time?  ''' +++$+++ ::But as I do believe Keltze  "has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions,"  has himself specifically been written about in context to his roles in ''[[Entourage (TV series)|Entourage]]'' and ''[[Prom (film)|Prom]]'', and as there are '''1.''' other sources available for expansion and sourcing, and '''2.''' a reasonable expectation that the upcoming releases of ''[[Playback (film)|Playback]]'' and ''[[Transgression (2011 film)|Transgression]]''[http://www.timescolonist.com/entertainment/Jonathan+Keltz+born/4685666/story.html] (new articles likely on the horizon), perhaps it might be conceded that we have ''just'' enough to allow it to remain and be expanded in due course of time?  '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 05:24, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
44678 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44675 +++$+++ 44677 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.304253360E09 +++$+++ As it stands, I think there is very, ''very'' little chance of a speedy. It sounds like it is substantially different, so that should be clear. If it goes up the way I saw it, deletion wouldn't be on my to do list. I'd certainly tag it and might need to dig in and see what kind of biographical info we have and can add. I disagree on the [[WP:ENT]] pass, but it's really a moot point. Passing or failing a guideline shouldn't matter; sources matter. I hope that ''some'' of those sources currently being uselessly cited for indisputable roles can be moved to source more substantial info about him: hometown, schooling, ''something''. I'll be watching for it (for some work), but I don't feel any particular need to argue with anyone about it. Thanks! -  +++$+++ :::As it stands, I think there is very, ''very'' little chance of a speedy. It sounds like it is substantially different, so that should be clear. If it goes up the way I saw it, deletion wouldn't be on my to do list. I'd certainly tag it and might need to dig in and see what kind of biographical info we have and can add. I disagree on the [[WP:ENT]] pass, but it's really a moot point. Passing or failing a guideline shouldn't matter; sources matter. I hope that ''some'' of those sources currently being uselessly cited for indisputable roles can be moved to source more substantial info about him: hometown, schooling, ''something''. I'll be watching for it (for some work), but I don't feel any particular need to argue with anyone about it. Thanks! - [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD#top|talk]]) 05:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
44679 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44675 +++$+++ 44678 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.304259660E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. I'll see about some additional expansion and sourcing before going live. Thanks for the input. Best, ''' +++$+++ ::::Fair enough. I'll see about some additional expansion and sourcing before going live. Thanks for the input. Best, '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 07:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

530196 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-21 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.237650540E09 +++$+++ On the Rex White article ... so the part about \"in today's value\" should, or should not be there? .. I thought it should not, but I'll follow your lead on that one. ;) \u2014  +++$+++ On the Rex White article ... so the part about "in today's value" should, or should not be there? .. I thought it should not, but I'll follow your lead on that one. ;) — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ched Davis|©]]</sub> 08:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
530197 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530196 +++$+++ 530196 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 09:01:00 +++$+++ 1.237651260E09 +++$+++ read it again, and I pretty sure you agree that putting today's value in there is wrong. Correct me if I'm wrong. \u2014  +++$+++ :read it again, and I pretty sure you agree that putting today's value in there is wrong. Correct me if I'm wrong. — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ched Davis|©]]</sub> 09:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
530198 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530196 +++$+++ 530197 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.237666200E09 +++$+++ {{tick|18}} '''Done''' We don't need speculation\/original research. Money needs to be understood in historical context. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::{{tick|18}} '''Done''' We don't need speculation/original research. Money needs to be understood in historical context. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

5909 +++$+++ NYyankees51 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5909 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-09 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.299714300E09 +++$+++ Hi Arzel, hope you're doing well. I just wanted to thank you for your help during my whole block fiasco, I really appreciated it. I would also like to ask you to get involved again in the [[Restoring Honor rally]] article again if you're willing. Thankfully we are all working together amicably, so if you're interested, feel free to jump back in. Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi Arzel, hope you're doing well. I just wanted to thank you for your help during my whole block fiasco, I really appreciated it. I would also like to ask you to get involved again in the [[Restoring Honor rally]] article again if you're willing. Thankfully we are all working together amicably, so if you're interested, feel free to jump back in. Thanks! [[User:NYyankees51|NYyankees51]] ([[User talk:NYyankees51|talk]]) 15:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
5910 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5909 +++$+++ 5909 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.299759480E09 +++$+++ Wish I could have been more help.  I have been on the side with the RHr article, but I am still paying attention to it.  You are right, it does appear to be a bit more amicable right now.   +++$+++ :Wish I could have been more help.  I have been on the side with the RHr article, but I am still paying attention to it.  You are right, it does appear to be a bit more amicable right now.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 04:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

5911 +++$+++ Dr.K. +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5911 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.300937100E09 +++$+++ I hope you realise that the Barack Obama article is under 1RR restriction.  +++$+++ I hope you realise that the Barack Obama article is under 1RR restriction. [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]]&nbsp;<small><sup style="position:relative">[[User talk:Dr.K.|λogos]]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Dr.K.|πraxis]]</span></sup></small> 20:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
5912 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5911 +++$+++ 5911 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.300937400E09 +++$+++ I guess I am not suprised, but since I have made only one revert I really don't have anything to worry about.   +++$+++ :I guess I am not suprised, but since I have made only one revert I really don't have anything to worry about.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 20:30, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

5916 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-17 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.305618420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your note. I just put on the semi-protection to deal with the recurring vandalism by IPs. the article was under semi-protection before, then that was superseded by the proposed changes test. That was finally removed today and there was more vandalism immediately. The article is still open for editing by yourself and other confirmed editors. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ Thanks for your note. I just put on the semi-protection to deal with the recurring vandalism by IPs. the article was under semi-protection before, then that was superseded by the proposed changes test. That was finally removed today and there was more vandalism immediately. The article is still open for editing by yourself and other confirmed editors. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 00:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
5917 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5916 +++$+++ 5916 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.305626400E09 +++$+++ I realize that, and I am not saying it shouldn't be semi protected, just that it probably should be a different admin that does it.   +++$+++ :I realize that, and I am not saying it shouldn't be semi protected, just that it probably should be a different admin that does it.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 03:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
5918 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5916 +++$+++ 5917 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.305627240E09 +++$+++ If we all agree that it should be protected for vandalism then it's permissible for an involved admin to add it. If you'd like to ask another admin to protect it I won't object. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::If we all agree that it should be protected for vandalism then it's permissible for an involved admin to add it. If you'd like to ask another admin to protect it I won't object. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 03:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
5919 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5916 +++$+++ 5918 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.305666660E09 +++$+++ Vandalism, yes.  But what you reverted was not vandalism.  You made a change to your preferred position and then semi-protected the page.  That is not permissible.   +++$+++ :::Vandalism, yes.  But what you reverted was not vandalism.  You made a change to your preferred position and then semi-protected the page.  That is not permissible.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 14:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
5920 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5916 +++$+++ 5919 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.305683220E09 +++$+++ I regard the deletion of sourced material without an explanation to be vandalism, especially when done by an IP editor, and I revert it many times a day. The page isn't locked, and any confirmed editor, such as yourself, can still edit it (so long as there's a consensus for contentious edits). So it's not an issue of fully protecting an article on a preferred version, which you're right would be inappropriate.  &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::::I regard the deletion of sourced material without an explanation to be vandalism, especially when done by an IP editor, and I revert it many times a day. The page isn't locked, and any confirmed editor, such as yourself, can still edit it (so long as there's a consensus for contentious edits). So it's not an issue of fully protecting an article on a preferred version, which you're right would be inappropriate.  &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 18:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

268063 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268063 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-02 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.207179060E09 +++$+++ I believe I can simplify some aspects of the first article \"concept of death and adjustment\" for you. First, we need to adjust with death for a healthier life. Primarily this article represents the concept that we need adjustment with death and also it elaborates every possible aspects of the necessity of adjustment - researches, history and scientific inferences. Secondarily, just think, depending on scientific information, religious preachings, and personal beliefs we have different kinds of conception about death. Researches showed that adjustment with the very hard truth - 'death' is variable in different times [like Philippe Aries said], in different stages of life [like Kubler Ross and I myself said ], in case of different conceptions we have about death [that my researches show]. Example of the last variation is - one who follows Islam or Christianity believes that we die but don't end. Their adjustment with death will differ with that of non believer just because their concept about death is different. So first issue is we need adjustment and the second and ultimate issue is concept of death is related to this adjustment. Is it clear now why the article is \"concept of death and adjustment\"? To make the issue clearly understandable, I have included the historical and theoretical descriptions of maladjustment with death. Let me know if it helps you. +++$+++ I believe I can simplify some aspects of the first article "concept of death and adjustment" for you. First, we need to adjust with death for a healthier life. Primarily this article represents the concept that we need adjustment with death and also it elaborates every possible aspects of the necessity of adjustment - researches, history and scientific inferences. Secondarily, just think, depending on scientific information, religious preachings, and personal beliefs we have different kinds of conception about death. Researches showed that adjustment with the very hard truth - 'death' is variable in different times [like Philippe Aries said], in different stages of life [like Kubler Ross and I myself said ], in case of different conceptions we have about death [that my researches show]. Example of the last variation is - one who follows Islam or Christianity believes that we die but don't end. Their adjustment with death will differ with that of non believer just because their concept about death is different. So first issue is we need adjustment and the second and ultimate issue is concept of death is related to this adjustment. Is it clear now why the article is "concept of death and adjustment"? To make the issue clearly understandable, I have included the historical and theoretical descriptions of maladjustment with death. Let me know if it helps you.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 16:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
268064 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268063 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.207268520E09 +++$+++ I need to email you.   +++$+++ ::I need to email you.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

445378 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-17 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.216281180E09 +++$+++ ...you asked all those questions! :). I've answered them.  +++$+++ ...you asked all those questions! :). I've answered them. [[User:Gwynand|Gwynand]] | [[User_talk:Gwynand|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Gwynand|Contribs]] 00:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
445379 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445378 +++$+++ 445378 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.216289460E09 +++$+++ In addition, if you wouldn't mind, I am curious: Why ''did'' you select this usename? What were\/are your thoughts behind it? -  +++$+++ :In addition, if you wouldn't mind, I am curious: Why ''did'' you select this usename? What were/are your thoughts behind it? - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 03:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
445380 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445378 +++$+++ 445379 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.216289820E09 +++$+++ Very little thought behind it. I had read that book recently and Wynand was by far the most interesting character. In hindsight, Roark was just the ''theory'' of a man, nothing real, and by the end of the book I felt Rand sort of lost control of what she was trying to do with him. Toohey wasn't believable... in ways she tried to make him come off as pure evil, but I don't believe anyone really acts in the manner he did. Anyways... it could have just as easily been ''Tom Joad'' or ''Swede Levov'', but I just picked Gwynand.  +++$+++ ::Very little thought behind it. I had read that book recently and Wynand was by far the most interesting character. In hindsight, Roark was just the ''theory'' of a man, nothing real, and by the end of the book I felt Rand sort of lost control of what she was trying to do with him. Toohey wasn't believable... in ways she tried to make him come off as pure evil, but I don't believe anyone really acts in the manner he did. Anyways... it could have just as easily been ''Tom Joad'' or ''Swede Levov'', but I just picked Gwynand. [[User:Gwynand|Gwynand]] | [[User_talk:Gwynand|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Gwynand|Contribs]] 03:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
445381 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445378 +++$+++ 445379 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.216290000E09 +++$+++ ...and assuming I don't withdraw the RfA, I'll answer as many questions as you like, although I'm not sure most, support or oppose, are reading them.  +++$+++ ::...and assuming I don't withdraw the RfA, I'll answer as many questions as you like, although I'm not sure most, support or oppose, are reading them. [[User:Gwynand|Gwynand]] | [[User_talk:Gwynand|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Gwynand|Contribs]] 03:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
445382 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445378 +++$+++ 445381 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.216291860E09 +++$+++ Incidentally, if, as you note above, you do decide to withdraw, if you are up for RfA again, please let me know. -  +++$+++ :::Incidentally, if, as you note above, you do decide to withdraw, if you are up for RfA again, please let me know. - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 03:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
445383 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445378 +++$+++ 445378 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.216356540E09 +++$+++ And I ''do'' intend to finally decide one way or the other. It probably makes little difference in the larger scheme of things, but I thought I would let you know what I, at least, was thinking (and ''that'' I was indeed thinking : ) -  +++$+++ :And I ''do'' intend to finally decide one way or the other. It probably makes little difference in the larger scheme of things, but I thought I would let you know what I, at least, was thinking (and ''that'' I was indeed thinking : ) - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 21:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
445384 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445378 +++$+++ 445383 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.216363560E09 +++$+++ Its though at first, but if you are willing to accept it for what it is, accept that you are not God's Gift to Wikipedia, then it's not so bad. I appreciate you being so thorough in your review and am eager to see the final !result. :)  +++$+++ ::Its though at first, but if you are willing to accept it for what it is, accept that you are not God's Gift to Wikipedia, then it's not so bad. I appreciate you being so thorough in your review and am eager to see the final !result. :) [[User:Gwynand|Gwynand]] | [[User_talk:Gwynand|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Gwynand|Contribs]] 23:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
445385 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445378 +++$+++ 445384 +++$+++ 2008-07-18 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.216378260E09 +++$+++ Could you clarify\/rephrase the above? I'm not only not understanding it contextually, I'm not really understanding it at all. (I'm guessing that a typo or two have me hamstrung, for one thing...) -  +++$+++ :::Could you clarify/rephrase the above? I'm not only not understanding it contextually, I'm not really understanding it at all. (I'm guessing that a typo or two have me hamstrung, for one thing...) - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 03:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
445386 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445378 +++$+++ 445385 +++$+++ 2008-07-18 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.216405020E09 +++$+++ Sorry, confusing with my hypothetical \"yous\". I meant to say that I think many candidates go in with the thought of, \"Gee... what a great editor I am, surely the community will love me.\" Coming to realize that isn't the case is necessary for a candidate to have a healthier reaction to the critiques in RfAs. By the way, I withdrew.  +++$+++ ::::Sorry, confusing with my hypothetical "yous". I meant to say that I think many candidates go in with the thought of, "Gee... what a great editor I am, surely the community will love me." Coming to realize that isn't the case is necessary for a candidate to have a healthier reaction to the critiques in RfAs. By the way, I withdrew. [[User:Gwynand|Gwynand]] | [[User_talk:Gwynand|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Gwynand|Contribs]] 11:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
445387 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445378 +++$+++ 445386 +++$+++ 2008-07-18 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.216440180E09 +++$+++ And... Enjoy your bourbon, I'm sure others are jealous : ) -  +++$+++ :::::And... Enjoy your bourbon, I'm sure others are jealous : ) - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 21:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

5921 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-23 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.306207260E09 +++$+++ Regarding these talk page comments[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=430533159] please do not use the talk page of a high traffic article to refer to WP as a \"cesspool\" or editors you disagree with of being a \"protectorate\" that whitewashes political articles.  Note that the Obama article and talk page are under \"article probation\" (see the header area of the talk page on that), and accusing editors who disagree with your efforts to add negative information about a politiciann of whitewashing the encyclopedia for political purposes is an [[WP:AGF|accusation of bad faith]] of the sort that lead to article probation in the first place.  If you have a specific proposal to discuss for improving the article, please engage in the consensus-building discussion relating to the content of the article, not the editors working on it.  Thanks, -  +++$+++ Regarding these talk page comments[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=430533159] please do not use the talk page of a high traffic article to refer to WP as a "cesspool" or editors you disagree with of being a "protectorate" that whitewashes political articles.  Note that the Obama article and talk page are under "article probation" (see the header area of the talk page on that), and accusing editors who disagree with your efforts to add negative information about a politiciann of whitewashing the encyclopedia for political purposes is an [[WP:AGF|accusation of bad faith]] of the sort that lead to article probation in the first place.  If you have a specific proposal to discuss for improving the article, please engage in the consensus-building discussion relating to the content of the article, not the editors working on it.  Thanks, - [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 20:21, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
5922 +++$+++ Darkstar1st +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5921 +++$+++ 5921 +++$+++ 2011-05-23 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.306210620E09 +++$+++ wow, have cesspool and protectorate really offended you that much?  back in the day, years before you were an editor here, this would have been laughable.  i am sad to see wp has become so sensitive, pass the tissue.   +++$+++ :wow, have cesspool and protectorate really offended you that much?  back in the day, years before you were an editor here, this would have been laughable.  i am sad to see wp has become so sensitive, pass the tissue.  [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 21:17, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
5923 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5921 +++$+++ 5922 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.306221960E09 +++$+++ The truth tends to hurt the most.  I must laugh at Wikidemon's comments however.  When the multitude of liberal editors insist on trashing conservatives those that try to abide by BLP policies are accused of whitewashing and a lack of good faith.   +++$+++ ::The truth tends to hurt the most.  I must laugh at Wikidemon's comments however.  When the multitude of liberal editors insist on trashing conservatives those that try to abide by BLP policies are accused of whitewashing and a lack of good faith.  [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel#top|talk]]) 00:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
5924 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5921 +++$+++ 5923 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.306222260E09 +++$+++ Laugh all you want here, but please heed the caution and try to keep discussion productive on the talk page.  Making things into a liberal versus conservative issue is decidedly unproductive.  There has been an arbitration case, article probation, hundreds of accounts blocked, and a few dozen administrative actions over the Obama article.  Accusing perceived ideological opponents of whitewashing and ownership is at the heart of the trouble and a favorite refrain of the many socks so I'm not particularly keen to banter jokingly over that.  No tissue necessary, just a collaborative approach.  -  +++$+++ :::Laugh all you want here, but please heed the caution and try to keep discussion productive on the talk page.  Making things into a liberal versus conservative issue is decidedly unproductive.  There has been an arbitration case, article probation, hundreds of accounts blocked, and a few dozen administrative actions over the Obama article.  Accusing perceived ideological opponents of whitewashing and ownership is at the heart of the trouble and a favorite refrain of the many socks so I'm not particularly keen to banter jokingly over that.  No tissue necessary, just a collaborative approach.  - [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 00:31, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

525275 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-07 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.176010560E09 +++$+++ I just left a stronger message at [[Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder]] about the need to return the article to FAS.  Prob is, it will need admin help.  The original article was at FAS, and was moved to FASD.  I copied most back to FAS about a month ago, but I can't solve the talk page.  That is, FAS was awarded Good article *before* the move to FASD, and now FASD is incorrectly listed at Good article.  I'm not sure I can get the talk page and those pieces back without admin help ?  Maybe I should just manually fix the Good article, and copy the templates, but then there will be no talk page history of the GA.   +++$+++ I just left a stronger message at [[Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder]] about the need to return the article to FAS.  Prob is, it will need admin help.  The original article was at FAS, and was moved to FASD.  I copied most back to FAS about a month ago, but I can't solve the talk page.  That is, FAS was awarded Good article *before* the move to FASD, and now FASD is incorrectly listed at Good article.  I'm not sure I can get the talk page and those pieces back without admin help ?  Maybe I should just manually fix the Good article, and copy the templates, but then there will be no talk page history of the GA.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
525276 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525275 +++$+++ 525275 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.176024780E09 +++$+++ I left comments on the talk page; I'm not sure that plan will work.  The more I look at the mess, the more I want to cry :-)  FAS has had enough work it might be worth keeping, so I'm not sure moving FASD to FAS is the best way to go.  But I really can't tell.  The entire topic has been merged as if they were one and the same, and since I don't know the topic, I don't know if I can undo all this damage without reading every single reference.  How can an article get that far without it coming to our attention (rhetorical sigh) ?  I only noticed it because a link was changed in [[Tourettism]], and I saw what was happening.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tourettism&diff=110845862&oldid=110656532]   Every time I try to help fix it, I just get discouraged :-(  What if we keep FAS, begin to work on it, and also keep FASD, and begin to prune it?  It's really hard for me to tell which will be most expedient.  +++$+++ :I left comments on the talk page; I'm not sure that plan will work.  The more I look at the mess, the more I want to cry :-)  FAS has had enough work it might be worth keeping, so I'm not sure moving FASD to FAS is the best way to go.  But I really can't tell.  The entire topic has been merged as if they were one and the same, and since I don't know the topic, I don't know if I can undo all this damage without reading every single reference.  How can an article get that far without it coming to our attention (rhetorical sigh) ?  I only noticed it because a link was changed in [[Tourettism]], and I saw what was happening.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tourettism&diff=110845862&oldid=110656532]   Every time I try to help fix it, I just get discouraged :-(  What if we keep FAS, begin to work on it, and also keep FASD, and begin to prune it?  It's really hard for me to tell which will be most expedient. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

5925 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.307923800E09 +++$+++ {{Wikipedia:WikiProject United States\/Newsletter\/Newsletter link|June 2011}}-- +++$+++ {{Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/Newsletter/Newsletter link|June 2011}}--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 17:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
5926 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5925 +++$+++ 5925 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308781320E09 +++$+++ Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives\u2014which houses some of America's most important historical documents\u2014is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/NARA\/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]].  +++$+++ :Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]]. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

268070 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-03 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.207207200E09 +++$+++ Good work!  Have you taken a look at any longer, more developed waterfall articles?  That might give you some more ideas for expansion.  Sorry, I can't be of any more help right now.  I'm typing this from my cell phone because the power is out in South Maui (and other parts of the island) due to high winds, which may have knocked down a power line.  Hopefully, I'll be back online tonight.  &mdash; +++$+++ Good work!  Have you taken a look at any longer, more developed waterfall articles?  That might give you some more ideas for expansion.  Sorry, I can't be of any more help right now.  I'm typing this from my cell phone because the power is out in South Maui (and other parts of the island) due to high winds, which may have knocked down a power line.  Hopefully, I'll be back online tonight.  &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 00:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268071 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.207215540E09 +++$+++ Ok, the power is back on, so I will see if I can make any suggestions.  Looks like you are doing just fine! &mdash; +++$+++ :Ok, the power is back on, so I will see if I can make any suggestions.  Looks like you are doing just fine! &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 02:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268072 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ 268071 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.207218360E09 +++$+++ I see a source on Google books has commented about the actual shrimp species.  I'll see if I can dig something up.  That would be a great addition to the article!  I wonder if it was a native shrimp? &mdash; +++$+++ ::I see a source on Google books has commented about the actual shrimp species.  I'll see if I can dig something up.  That would be a great addition to the article!  I wonder if it was a native shrimp? &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 03:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268073 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ 268072 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.207219500E09 +++$+++ Ok, I'm still looking into it, but it appears to be a [[Halocaridina]].  Haven't confirmed this just yet.  The Hawaiian name appears to be  \u02bb\u014dpae\u02bbula.  A travel website says that the shrimp is native and that they are still found in the pools below the waterfall and that when they lay their eggs, it turns the color of the pools and the waterfall, red.  Still searching for more info, but that would work really well in the article. &mdash; +++$+++ :::Ok, I'm still looking into it, but it appears to be a [[Halocaridina]].  Haven't confirmed this just yet.  The Hawaiian name appears to be  ʻōpaeʻula.  A travel website says that the shrimp is native and that they are still found in the pools below the waterfall and that when they lay their eggs, it turns the color of the pools and the waterfall, red.  Still searching for more info, but that would work really well in the article. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 03:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268074 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ 268073 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.207219680E09 +++$+++ It turns out it must be a completely different species, as there are apparently no Halocaridina on Kauai.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::It turns out it must be a completely different species, as there are apparently no Halocaridina on Kauai.  &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 03:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268075 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ 268074 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.207220280E09 +++$+++ The only shrimp species I can find in the vicinity of Opaeka'a Falls is ''Atyoida bisulcata'', which are known for the ability to climb waterfalls. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::The only shrimp species I can find in the vicinity of Opaeka'a Falls is ''Atyoida bisulcata'', which are known for the ability to climb waterfalls. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 03:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268076 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ 268075 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.207249620E09 +++$+++ If you could get any reference regarding the shrimp, that would be great. The article right now is at 4700 kbs.   +++$+++ ::::::If you could get any reference regarding the shrimp, that would be great. The article right now is at 4700 kbs.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268077 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ 268076 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.207250100E09 +++$+++ I might be able to find you something tomorrow morning.  I'm going to get back to work on the plant article right now.  I think you'll make the 5x no problem.  Either way, I'll have something for you in the next 24 hours if you don't have enough content. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::I might be able to find you something tomorrow morning.  I'm going to get back to work on the plant article right now.  I think you'll make the 5x no problem.  Either way, I'll have something for you in the next 24 hours if you don't have enough content. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 12:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268078 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.207254240E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I just spent the last hour trying to sync my [[Zotero]] database on two machines so I can work offline on my laptop.  I'll have to get back to you tomorrow on this.  Keep up the great work. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::Sorry, I just spent the last hour trying to sync my [[Zotero]] database on two machines so I can work offline on my laptop.  I'll have to get back to you tomorrow on this.  Keep up the great work. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 13:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268079 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.207254780E09 +++$+++ I just uninstalled [[Zotero]] because I could not figure out how to use it!   +++$+++ ::::::::::I just uninstalled [[Zotero]] because I could not figure out how to use it!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268080 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.207260120E09 +++$+++ O.K. It is big enough I think. Now to search for a hook. Since Hawaii is hardly ever meantioned in DYKs (from what I have noticed) they will be prone to select it for that reason with a good hook.   +++$+++ :::::::::::O.K. It is big enough I think. Now to search for a hook. Since Hawaii is hardly ever meantioned in DYKs (from what I have noticed) they will be prone to select it for that reason with a good hook.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268081 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.207266240E09 +++$+++ I posted it on DYK with an alt hook. Maybe you can think of a better one.   +++$+++ ::::::::::::I posted it on DYK with an alt hook. Maybe you can think of a better one.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268082 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.207289700E09 +++$+++ No, it looks great, but my personal preference would be to remove (rolling shrimp in Hawaiian) as it breaks up the flow, but that's just me.  Maybe they like that kind of thing on DYK? I have no idea.  BTW, I moved the mountain article to the correct spelling.  You might want to correct the sp. in the waterfall article, too.  Thanks for showing me how to do the DYK by example.  You're a good teacher. :) &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::::::No, it looks great, but my personal preference would be to remove (rolling shrimp in Hawaiian) as it breaks up the flow, but that's just me.  Maybe they like that kind of thing on DYK? I have no idea.  BTW, I moved the mountain article to the correct spelling.  You might want to correct the sp. in the waterfall article, too.  Thanks for showing me how to do the DYK by example.  You're a good teacher. :) &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 23:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268083 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.207289820E09 +++$+++ Do you mean remove it in the article or the DYK?   +++$+++ ::::::::::::::Do you mean remove it in the article or the DYK?  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268084 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.207290000E09 +++$+++ In the DYK, but that's just my opinion.  Maybe they prefer that kind of thing there.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::::::::In the DYK, but that's just my opinion.  Maybe they prefer that kind of thing there.  &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 23:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268085 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.207290000E09 +++$+++ Oh, and since MPerel and I have been working on expanding the Hawaiian plant article since the first, if I submit a DYK at some point today (after some more expansion), do I enter it under April 3?  And, would it be better if I added an image or two, or does that not matter for DYK? &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::::::Oh, and since MPerel and I have been working on expanding the Hawaiian plant article since the first, if I submit a DYK at some point today (after some more expansion), do I enter it under April 3?  And, would it be better if I added an image or two, or does that not matter for DYK? &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 23:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268086 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.207290420E09 +++$+++ I puzzled over that myself and opted for the earlier date as a precaution. You can always add on to an article after its in DYK. And yes, they love pictures. The picture has to be relevant to the article and a PD&mdash;no fair use images for the main page. And the hook, what ever you use, has to have a reference citation in the article. They don't want any unreferenced material on the main page.  +++$+++ :::::::::::::::I puzzled over that myself and opted for the earlier date as a precaution. You can always add on to an article after its in DYK. And yes, they love pictures. The picture has to be relevant to the article and a PD&mdash;no fair use images for the main page. And the hook, what ever you use, has to have a reference citation in the article. They don't want any unreferenced material on the main page. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268087 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.207290960E09 +++$+++ Also, put the DYK page on your watchlist when you enter it. Sometimes they ask you a question under the entry, like does this have a reference, or isn't there something more interesting you can say (they like wacko type factoids), or can you shorten the entry (they have a max of 300 bytes for the hook?  +++$+++ ::::::::::::::::Also, put the DYK page on your watchlist when you enter it. Sometimes they ask you a question under the entry, like does this have a reference, or isn't there something more interesting you can say (they like wacko type factoids), or can you shorten the entry (they have a max of 300 bytes for the hook? [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
268088 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.207350360E09 +++$+++ Ok. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::::::::::Ok. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 16:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268089 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.207350780E09 +++$+++ I still don't know which date to place it under.  It's been under expansion from April 1-4. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::::::::::I still don't know which date to place it under.  It's been under expansion from April 1-4. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 16:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268090 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.207351680E09 +++$+++ Well, if you entered it today, and counted back five days, it would only be a 2 1\/2 fold increase if my math is correct. Find a span (the DYK people are working on March 30\/31 now so a span after that) that includes a five-fold increase. Or near to a five-fold increase. You clearly have the five-fold increase now. So pick find a span (between April 1 and now) where you have made great strides toward the five-fold increase without necessarily reaching by that date. The span  must be between April 1 and now. (They might let you slip under the door if is was March 31 - but I don't know - depends on how hard up they are for entries.)  If it is posted for a few days it gets vetted and suggestions may be made regarding the hook, etc.   +++$+++ :::::::::::::::::::Well, if you entered it today, and counted back five days, it would only be a 2 1/2 fold increase if my math is correct. Find a span (the DYK people are working on March 30/31 now so a span after that) that includes a five-fold increase. Or near to a five-fold increase. You clearly have the five-fold increase now. So pick find a span (between April 1 and now) where you have made great strides toward the five-fold increase without necessarily reaching by that date. The span  must be between April 1 and now. (They might let you slip under the door if is was March 31 - but I don't know - depends on how hard up they are for entries.)  If it is posted for a few days it gets vetted and suggestions may be made regarding the hook, etc.  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268091 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.207354740E09 +++$+++ I added it under April 1st.  If you think it should be somewhere else, or if you think it needs to be changed in any way, please do so.  I'm going to bed now.  :) &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::::::::::::I added it under April 1st.  If you think it should be somewhere else, or if you think it needs to be changed in any way, please do so.  I'm going to bed now.  :) &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 17:19, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268092 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.207375740E09 +++$+++ I changed your \"indigenous\" to \"endemic\".  It's an important distinction.  :) &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::::::::::::I changed your "indigenous" to "endemic".  It's an important distinction.  :) &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 23:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

5927 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5927 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-23 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.308879900E09 +++$+++ After the latest [[Talk:Abortion-rights_movement#Move.3F|move request]] has landed up with about equal numbers for both sides I've started a [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal\/Cases\/2011-06-22\/Abortion-rights movement|mediation request]]. Please indicate there if you wish to participate. Thanks. --  +++$+++ After the latest [[Talk:Abortion-rights_movement#Move.3F|move request]] has landed up with about equal numbers for both sides I've started a [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-06-22/Abortion-rights movement|mediation request]]. Please indicate there if you wish to participate. Thanks. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 18:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
5928 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5927 +++$+++ 5927 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.309832520E09 +++$+++ A proposal has been made to rename the two abortion articles to completely new names, namely 'Opposition to legalized abortion' and 'Support for legalized abortion'. The idea, which is located [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal\/Cases\/2011-06-22\/Abortion-rights movement|at the Mediation Cabal]], is currently open for opinions. Your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated. --  +++$+++ :A proposal has been made to rename the two abortion articles to completely new names, namely 'Opposition to legalized abortion' and 'Support for legalized abortion'. The idea, which is located [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-06-22/Abortion-rights movement|at the Mediation Cabal]], is currently open for opinions. Your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 19:22, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

5929 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-02 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.309621260E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Your efforts here (Wikipedia) are greatly appreciated; perhaps more than you may know.  Stay calm, and continue your great work.  Cheers.  \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Your efforts here (Wikipedia) are greatly appreciated; perhaps more than you may know.  Stay calm, and continue your great work.  Cheers.  — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 08:41, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
5930 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Arzel +++$+++ 5929 +++$+++ 5929 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.309621320E09 +++$+++ Besides ... I had to try that \"Wikilove\" button just once. :) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :Besides ... I had to try that "Wikilove" button just once. :) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 08:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

530219 +++$+++ MrDarcy +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-31 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.238489220E09 +++$+++ I was hoping for more than just a \"disagree\" - where's the evidence of notability? Or do you disagree on other grounds? Thanks.  +++$+++ I was hoping for more than just a "disagree" - where's the evidence of notability? Or do you disagree on other grounds? Thanks. [[User:MrDarcy|Mr. Darcy]] <small>[[User talk:MrDarcy|talk]]</small> 01:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
530220 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530219 +++$+++ 530219 +++$+++ 2009-03-31 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.238489640E09 +++$+++ She's the senior editor at two very notable magazines. Speedy deletion is only for cases of obviously non-notable people. There ''may'' be enough notability right there, so a full discussion (or at least prod) is warranted. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :She's the senior editor at two very notable magazines. Speedy deletion is only for cases of obviously non-notable people. There ''may'' be enough notability right there, so a full discussion (or at least prod) is warranted. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
530221 +++$+++ MrDarcy +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530219 +++$+++ 530220 +++$+++ 2009-03-31 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.238492760E09 +++$+++ I'll throw an afd on there at some point, but just for the sake of defending my position, an article may be speedily deleted if it \"does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.\" I don't see how this article does so for its subject. She's a \"senior editor\" - but not THE senior editor, since even the article indicates she's the senior \"west coast\" editor, which implies at least one layer above her - for one magazine and its spinoff. I was actually more concerned with whether anyone thought her presence on IMDB was sufficient to avoid SD. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::I'll throw an afd on there at some point, but just for the sake of defending my position, an article may be speedily deleted if it "does not indicate why its subject is important or significant." I don't see how this article does so for its subject. She's a "senior editor" - but not THE senior editor, since even the article indicates she's the senior "west coast" editor, which implies at least one layer above her - for one magazine and its spinoff. I was actually more concerned with whether anyone thought her presence on IMDB was sufficient to avoid SD. Thanks. [[User:MrDarcy|Mr. Darcy]] <small>[[User talk:MrDarcy|talk]]</small> 02:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
530222 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530219 +++$+++ 530221 +++$+++ 2009-03-31 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.238493000E09 +++$+++ I did think that her acting career and the IMDB reference added to the notability. Vogue is a ''major'' magazine, which is why I contest. These are the thoughts that were going through my head. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::I did think that her acting career and the IMDB reference added to the notability. Vogue is a ''major'' magazine, which is why I contest. These are the thoughts that were going through my head. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:50, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

5935 +++$+++ Peter jackson +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-16 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.221588060E09 +++$+++ Since you ask, the nagari form may be correct for modern (Hindi) pronunciation, but in classical pronunciation a consonant without attached vowel has a default a, so it would be pronounced ninali. unfortunately I lack the computer expertise to show you how to deal with that.  +++$+++ Since you ask, the nagari form may be correct for modern (Hindi) pronunciation, but in classical pronunciation a consonant without attached vowel has a default a, so it would be pronounced ninali. unfortunately I lack the computer expertise to show you how to deal with that. [[User:Peter jackson|Peter jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter jackson|talk]]) 11:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
5936 +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5935 +++$+++ 5935 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.221600900E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I'm OK with some slight differences in pronunciation, where it's more or less unavoidable or a compromise (like the Chinese \"ren\" character in my Chinese\/kanji version) \u2013 as long as it doesn't just look silly\/impossible to people who know the script. I guess my next question would be: is there a way (classically, perhaps with another diacritic) to denote the ''lack'' of a vowel in that location? Or would that just be unlikely to happen in Skt? If you have any input, I can figure out the computer side of it. \/ +++$+++ :Thanks! I'm OK with some slight differences in pronunciation, where it's more or less unavoidable or a compromise (like the Chinese "ren" character in my Chinese/kanji version) – as long as it doesn't just look silly/impossible to people who know the script. I guess my next question would be: is there a way (classically, perhaps with another diacritic) to denote the ''lack'' of a vowel in that location? Or would that just be unlikely to happen in Skt? If you have any input, I can figure out the computer side of it. /[[User:Ninly|Ninly]] ([[User talk:Ninly#top|talk]]) 14:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
5937 +++$+++ Peter jackson +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5935 +++$+++ 5936 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.222279860E09 +++$+++ There is a way. 2 actually. But as I said I don't know how to show you. Maybe you could look @ an appropriate article.  +++$+++ ::There is a way. 2 actually. But as I said I don't know how to show you. Maybe you could look @ an appropriate article. [[User:Peter jackson|Peter jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter jackson|talk]]) 11:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

530226 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-31 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.238523540E09 +++$+++ I don't know if you worked with him on any of the Wisconsin articles, but if you did, then I extend my condolences to you as well for the passing of [[User:Nitelinger]].  I didn't know him myself - but I wouldn't be surprised if you did since you both worked on similar articles.  I'm always sad in a way to hear of ''anyone'' passing away - but my own personal religious beliefs allow me to see things a little differently at times.  Reading through some of the contribs, it appears he was a great editor - and I'll pray that God take good care of him (my personal beliefs - not meant to preach or suggest any one belief is better than another). \u2014  +++$+++ I don't know if you worked with him on any of the Wisconsin articles, but if you did, then I extend my condolences to you as well for the passing of [[User:Nitelinger]].  I didn't know him myself - but I wouldn't be surprised if you did since you both worked on similar articles.  I'm always sad in a way to hear of ''anyone'' passing away - but my own personal religious beliefs allow me to see things a little differently at times.  Reading through some of the contribs, it appears he was a great editor - and I'll pray that God take good care of him (my personal beliefs - not meant to preach or suggest any one belief is better than another). — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ched Davis|©]]</sub> 11:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
530227 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530226 +++$+++ 530226 +++$+++ 2009-03-31 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.238525040E09 +++$+++ I don't recall crossing paths. I share your strong religious beliefs and I'm saddened to here about Nitelinger's passing. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I don't recall crossing paths. I share your strong religious beliefs and I'm saddened to here about Nitelinger's passing. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 11:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

5940 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5940 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-04 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.225833960E09 +++$+++ Hi.  FYI...changing the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Papah%C4%81naumoku%C4%81kea_Marine_National_Monument&diff=237583380&oldid=237357796 name of the image] doesn't actually change the name.  Instead, it changes it to a nonexistent file which results in no image at all.  Please always remember to preview your edits.  Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi.  FYI...changing the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Papah%C4%81naumoku%C4%81kea_Marine_National_Monument&diff=237583380&oldid=237357796 name of the image] doesn't actually change the name.  Instead, it changes it to a nonexistent file which results in no image at all.  Please always remember to preview your edits.  Thanks. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 13:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
5941 +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5940 +++$+++ 5940 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.225844220E09 +++$+++ Oops; I thought I was changing the caption rather than the filename. Thanks for the notification. \/ +++$+++ :Oops; I thought I was changing the caption rather than the filename. Thanks for the notification. /[[User:Ninly|Ninly]] ([[User talk:Ninly#top|talk]]) 16:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

525278 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-08 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.176096300E09 +++$+++ For creating [[lipstatin]], which I just expanded a bit. I'm curious as to how you were so fast... are you, in fact, a med\/chem article-creating bot? :) Best,  +++$+++ For creating [[lipstatin]], which I just expanded a bit. I'm curious as to how you were so fast... are you, in fact, a med/chem article-creating bot? :) Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 22:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
525279 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525278 +++$+++ 525278 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.176096600E09 +++$+++ Not quite, but [http:\/\/diberri.dyndns.org\/wikipedia\/templates\/?type=pubmed Diberri's tool] just added PubChem yesterday, which should help speed a lot of things up. -- +++$+++ :Not quite, but [http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/templates/?type=pubmed Diberri's tool] just added PubChem yesterday, which should help speed a lot of things up. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
525280 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525278 +++$+++ 525279 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.176097200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up. I'll try and make good use of it.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the heads-up. I'll try and make good use of it. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 22:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

5942 +++$+++ A ntv +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-17 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.226977320E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your copyedit of [[Assumption of Moses]].  +++$+++ Thank you for your copyedit of [[Assumption of Moses]]. [[User:A ntv|A ntv]] ([[User talk:A ntv|talk]]) 19:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
5943 +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5942 +++$+++ 5942 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.226977500E09 +++$+++ My pleasure. Nice work!  +++$+++ :My pleasure. Nice work! [[User:Ninly|/Ninly]] ([[User talk:Ninly#top|talk]]) 19:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
5944 +++$+++ A ntv +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5942 +++$+++ 5943 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.229191860E09 +++$+++ If you like to copyedit, would you have a look to [[Apocalypse of Abraham]] I've expanded?. Thanks a lot!!.  +++$+++ ::If you like to copyedit, would you have a look to [[Apocalypse of Abraham]] I've expanded?. Thanks a lot!!. [[User:A ntv|A ntv]] ([[User talk:A ntv|talk]]) 10:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
5945 +++$+++ A ntv +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5942 +++$+++ 5944 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.229270580E09 +++$+++ Thank you !  +++$+++ :::Thank you ! [[User:A ntv|A ntv]] ([[User talk:A ntv|talk]]) 08:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

530231 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530231 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-01 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.238609400E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on the article about Wisconsin's Holyland article getting the DYK honor. This was overdo considering the work and research you put in it-Many thanks- +++$+++ Congratulations on the article about Wisconsin's Holyland article getting the DYK honor. This was overdo considering the work and research you put in it-Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 11:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
530232 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530231 +++$+++ 530231 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.238611560E09 +++$+++ I was aiming for April Fool's Day all along - April Fool's or bust. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I was aiming for April Fool's Day all along - April Fool's or bust. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 11:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

530233 +++$+++ Freekee +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-02 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.238665980E09 +++$+++ Nice picture on that article, too. - +++$+++ Nice picture on that article, too. -[[User:Freekee|Freekee]] ([[User talk:Freekee|talk]]) 02:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
530234 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530233 +++$+++ 530233 +++$+++ 2009-04-02 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.238671020E09 +++$+++ Thanks! The church is on the National Register of Historic Places. I'll have to go to church there some Sunday and get some pictures. The church has been around so long - it was the first church in the wilderness between Green Bay and Milwaukee. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thanks! The church is on the National Register of Historic Places. I'll have to go to church there some Sunday and get some pictures. The church has been around so long - it was the first church in the wilderness between Green Bay and Milwaukee. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

268093 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268093 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-04 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.207375920E09 +++$+++ (outdent) I realized I was in over my head once I started really looks at those articles. What the distinction, plant-wise?  +++$+++ (outdent) I realized I was in over my head once I started really looks at those articles. What the distinction, plant-wise? [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268094 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268093 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.207376460E09 +++$+++ Indigenous means native to a place, but doesn't exclude the species appearing in multiple places.  Endemic means it is only native to one, unique location.  Endemic species are common on islands due to their geographical isolation.  The [[Gal\xe1pagos Islands]] are one famous example. &mdash; +++$+++ ::Indigenous means native to a place, but doesn't exclude the species appearing in multiple places.  Endemic means it is only native to one, unique location.  Endemic species are common on islands due to their geographical isolation.  The [[Galápagos Islands]] are one famous example. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 23:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268095 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268093 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.207377480E09 +++$+++ I think it is problematic to refer to the plant as [[pigweed]] because that could be one of three different plants, one of which happens to be ''[[Portulaca oleracea]]'', one of its greatest enemies on Nihoa! &mdash; +++$+++ :::I think it is problematic to refer to the plant as [[pigweed]] because that could be one of three different plants, one of which happens to be ''[[Portulaca oleracea]]'', one of its greatest enemies on Nihoa! &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 23:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268096 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268093 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.207377840E09 +++$+++ BTW, you're very good at this! :)  I wish you would join [[WP:HAWAII]].  We need you. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::BTW, you're very good at this! :)  I wish you would join [[WP:HAWAII]].  We need you. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 23:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268097 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268093 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.207378380E09 +++$+++ I'd like to. I've been looking through the Hawaii stubs but it is hard to find any information to enlarge them with. Most of them already have the easy-to-find info. Through my wikipedia projects I have books on Indian and Chinese architecture, the Cuban revolution etc., I would have to get a source of information on Hawaii. My one book on Hawaii I got whan I was there.  I am going again in two weeks. Maybe I'll make an issue of finding something there!   +++$+++ :::::I'd like to. I've been looking through the Hawaii stubs but it is hard to find any information to enlarge them with. Most of them already have the easy-to-find info. Through my wikipedia projects I have books on Indian and Chinese architecture, the Cuban revolution etc., I would have to get a source of information on Hawaii. My one book on Hawaii I got whan I was there.  I am going again in two weeks. Maybe I'll make an issue of finding something there!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268098 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268093 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.207378920E09 +++$+++ You make a good point.  I've been thinking of putting together a resources page for editors doing research on Hawaii-related articles, and providing links to good, online resources.  Would you find that helpful?  Also, I've thought about sorting it by topic.  When you were looking through the stubs to expand, would it have helped first if you had been given a list of topics rather than names? &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::You make a good point.  I've been thinking of putting together a resources page for editors doing research on Hawaii-related articles, and providing links to good, online resources.  Would you find that helpful?  Also, I've thought about sorting it by topic.  When you were looking through the stubs to expand, would it have helped first if you had been given a list of topics rather than names? &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 00:02, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
268099 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268093 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.207379460E09 +++$+++ Yes, it would be wonderful to have sources. The Hawaiian name thing is very difficult, but by topic&mdash;how would that work? I guess I get interested in topics, like architecture, geology, archeology, etc. By the way, what would you prefer to pigweed? I was just trying to get the DYK's attention, like with the rolling shrimp. A hook is a hook. They don't care if it has little to do with the article, expect if pigweed is wrong then you should change it.  +++$+++ :::::::Yes, it would be wonderful to have sources. The Hawaiian name thing is very difficult, but by topic&mdash;how would that work? I guess I get interested in topics, like architecture, geology, archeology, etc. By the way, what would you prefer to pigweed? I was just trying to get the DYK's attention, like with the rolling shrimp. A hook is a hook. They don't care if it has little to do with the article, expect if pigweed is wrong then you should change it. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
268100 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268093 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.207379820E09 +++$+++ Ok, I have an idea of how to provide sources and topics to help editors improve Hawaii-related articles. Maybe you will be my guinea pig? :) The term pigweed is ambiguous; yes many web sources call Brown's amaranth \"pigweed\", and I don't know if it is correct or not, but the last dispatch from the USFWS maintains that it has no common name, and one of its main competitors is in fact, known as a \"pigweed\".  Since there are at least three types of plants that can be called [[pigweed]], it's hard to say who is right and who is wrong, which is why I just went with [[amaranth]]! :) &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::Ok, I have an idea of how to provide sources and topics to help editors improve Hawaii-related articles. Maybe you will be my guinea pig? :) The term pigweed is ambiguous; yes many web sources call Brown's amaranth "pigweed", and I don't know if it is correct or not, but the last dispatch from the USFWS maintains that it has no common name, and one of its main competitors is in fact, known as a "pigweed".  Since there are at least three types of plants that can be called [[pigweed]], it's hard to say who is right and who is wrong, which is why I just went with [[amaranth]]! :) &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 00:17, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
268101 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268093 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.207381380E09 +++$+++ Pigweed is a little more user friendly Latin plant names, for the DKY. Probably if it gets on the main page you get a note from someone or some editor will changed, with an adit summary reflecting his superior state of knowledge. Thanks for the Barnstar. It's much appreciated! By the way, I forgot to mention that I am interested in brdiges, dams, reservoirs and irrigation systme. I nearly started working an an article about a ditch, but my eyes gave out on the Google book. Also, the subject became more complicated because an isolated ditch is nothing if not part of a system and the history of sugar cane, etc.  +++$+++ :::::::::Pigweed is a little more user friendly Latin plant names, for the DKY. Probably if it gets on the main page you get a note from someone or some editor will changed, with an adit summary reflecting his superior state of knowledge. Thanks for the Barnstar. It's much appreciated! By the way, I forgot to mention that I am interested in brdiges, dams, reservoirs and irrigation systme. I nearly started working an an article about a ditch, but my eyes gave out on the Google book. Also, the subject became more complicated because an isolated ditch is nothing if not part of a system and the history of sugar cane, etc. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
268102 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268093 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.207381560E09 +++$+++ That got saved accidentally, with no edit summary so I will thank you properly for the Barnstar!   +++$+++ :::::::::::That got saved accidentally, with no edit summary so I will thank you properly for the Barnstar!  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
268103 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268093 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.207382220E09 +++$+++ You're welcome.  If you are interested in bridges, dams, reservoirs, and irrigation systems, you're in luck.  There is a lot of material on that subject because of the amount of land used in Hawaii for agriculture.  In fact, if you do any research on Hawaii history at all, it would be impossible for you to ignore it!  This is especially true if you are studying [[Sugar plantations in Hawaii]].  I think you will really be interested in [[Ka Loko Reservoir]], as it is still a stub, and there is tons of good information about it in the news archives! &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::You're welcome.  If you are interested in bridges, dams, reservoirs, and irrigation systems, you're in luck.  There is a lot of material on that subject because of the amount of land used in Hawaii for agriculture.  In fact, if you do any research on Hawaii history at all, it would be impossible for you to ignore it!  This is especially true if you are studying [[Sugar plantations in Hawaii]].  I think you will really be interested in [[Ka Loko Reservoir]], as it is still a stub, and there is tons of good information about it in the news archives! &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 00:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

5950 +++$+++ Againme +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5950 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-21 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.277172120E09 +++$+++ The past does not exist outside study??? I'm an historian. You are simply confussing history with historiography... -- +++$+++ The past does not exist outside study??? I'm an historian. You are simply confussing history with historiography... --[[User:Againme|Againme]] ([[User talk:Againme|talk]]) 19:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
5951 +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5950 +++$+++ 5950 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.277176620E09 +++$+++ I suppose it depends on whom you ask. I am familiar with the distinction between history and historiography. The way I put it in the edit summary is certainly an oversimplification, but there has definitely been scholarly discussion along those lines (historians cannot see the past itself, they can only see the evidence, the archive, and draw conclusions from it). On the other hand, the sense of ''history'' as referring to the past itself is definitely in common usage, much as the word ''psychology'' may be used to refer to an individual psyche. In any case, I'm not an expert (far from it), and don't feel too strongly one way of the other; I just saw a potential conflict with consensus and raised it. If you feel strongly that yours is an accurate and referenceable definition, I'm fine with that. <span style=\"text-shadow:#EECC99 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; \">'''\/''' +++$+++ :I suppose it depends on whom you ask. I am familiar with the distinction between history and historiography. The way I put it in the edit summary is certainly an oversimplification, but there has definitely been scholarly discussion along those lines (historians cannot see the past itself, they can only see the evidence, the archive, and draw conclusions from it). On the other hand, the sense of ''history'' as referring to the past itself is definitely in common usage, much as the word ''psychology'' may be used to refer to an individual psyche. In any case, I'm not an expert (far from it), and don't feel too strongly one way of the other; I just saw a potential conflict with consensus and raised it. If you feel strongly that yours is an accurate and referenceable definition, I'm fine with that. <span style="text-shadow:#EECC99 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; ">'''/'''[[User:Ninly|<span style="color:OrangeRed;">ninly</span>]]<sub>([[User talk:Ninly|<span style="color:Orange">talk</span>]])</sub></span> 20:17, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

5953 +++$+++ Redheylin +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5953 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-22 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.293030000E09 +++$+++ Thanks  +++$+++ Thanks [[User:Redheylin|Redheylin]] ([[User talk:Redheylin|talk]]) 07:00, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
5954 +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5953 +++$+++ 5953 +++$+++ 2011-01-12 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.294837860E09 +++$+++ It just seemed to me like an overly prominent place in the article for one book's\/writer's assessment. Cutting the content entirely may have been excessive, it may be a good thing to include. <span style=\"font-family:monospace;text-shadow:#EECC99 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em\">\/ +++$+++ :It just seemed to me like an overly prominent place in the article for one book's/writer's assessment. Cutting the content entirely may have been excessive, it may be a good thing to include. <span style="font-family:monospace;text-shadow:#EECC99 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em">/[[User:Ninly|<span style="color:OrangeRed;">ninly</span>]]<sub>([[User talk:Ninly|<span style="color:Orange">talk</span>]])</sub></span> 05:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

5955 +++$+++ Panicpgh +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-02 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.296653580E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that <small>''' +++$+++ Sorry about that <small>'''[[User:Panicpgh|<span style="border:1px solid #000066;padding:1px;">Bruno</span>]][[User talk:Panicpgh| <span style="border:1px solid #000066;padding:1px;">talk</span>]]'''</small> 05:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
5956 +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5955 +++$+++ 5955 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.296684300E09 +++$+++ Hah, don't worry about it! I've found myself in similar brambles many times. Thanks for the heads-up, though. Not sure why [[Wikipedia:Twinkle|Twinkle]] didn't \"see\" that 6th vandalism edit, but I'll keep an eye out for that in the future. <span style=\"font-family:monospace;text-shadow:#EECC99 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em\">\/ +++$+++ :Hah, don't worry about it! I've found myself in similar brambles many times. Thanks for the heads-up, though. Not sure why [[Wikipedia:Twinkle|Twinkle]] didn't "see" that 6th vandalism edit, but I'll keep an eye out for that in the future. <span style="font-family:monospace;text-shadow:#EECC99 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em">/[[User:Ninly|<span style="color:OrangeRed;">ninly</span>]]<sub>([[User talk:Ninly|<span style="color:Orange">talk</span>]])</sub></span> 14:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

394209 +++$+++ Armbrust +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ 394209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-05 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.281046500E09 +++$+++ }} <font color=\"#082567\"> +++$+++ }} <font color="#082567">[[User:Armbrust|Armbrust]]</font> <sup><font color="#E3A857">[[User talk:Armbrust|Talk]]</font></sup> <sub><font color="#008000">[[Special:Contributions/Armbrust|Contribs]]</font></sub> 15:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
394210 +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ 394209 +++$+++ 394209 +++$+++ 2010-08-05 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.281058080E09 +++$+++ Thanks! =D <span style=white-space:nowrap>\u300c +++$+++ :Thanks! =D <span style=white-space:nowrap>「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#00f>ダイノ<span style=color:#080>ガイ]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#F90>千？！]]」<sup>[[Help:IJP|?]] · [[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|Talk⇒Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 18:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
394211 +++$+++ KrebMarkt +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ 394209 +++$+++ 394210 +++$+++ 2010-08-05 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.281059520E09 +++$+++ Happy Birthday Cheers... -- +++$+++ ::Happy Birthday Cheers... --[[User:KrebMarkt|KrebMarkt]] ([[User talk:KrebMarkt|talk]]) 18:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
394212 +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ 394209 +++$+++ 394211 +++$+++ 2010-08-05 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.281060840E09 +++$+++ OM NOM NOM XD <span style=white-space:nowrap>\u300c +++$+++ :::OM NOM NOM XD <span style=white-space:nowrap>「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#00f>ダイノ<span style=color:#080>ガイ]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#F90>千？！]]」<sup>[[Help:IJP|?]] · [[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|Talk⇒Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 19:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

5960 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-15 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.302921300E09 +++$+++ In best practice, no.  See [[WP:CITEBUNDLE]] and [[WP:CITECLUTTER]]. When a source is used ''once'' to cite the same material, it is best to bundle them to preserve readability and avoid clutter.  In lead sections alone, the material in question should be a summary of information already cited in the body so citations aren't needed.  I'm not at all clear why you restored the multiple cites to the lead.  I had properly formatted the citations using a semicolon per [[Wikipedia:Citation_overkill#How_to_group_cites|how to group cites]], which is common practice.  Excessive use of citation tags is also considered a typical red flag for other issues, such as trying to reinforce a disputed point.  This is why, as an article moves up the assessment chain, from B to GA to FA, you'll find few, if any articles, using citations in the lead or multiple citations in the body.  +++$+++ In best practice, no.  See [[WP:CITEBUNDLE]] and [[WP:CITECLUTTER]]. When a source is used ''once'' to cite the same material, it is best to bundle them to preserve readability and avoid clutter.  In lead sections alone, the material in question should be a summary of information already cited in the body so citations aren't needed.  I'm not at all clear why you restored the multiple cites to the lead.  I had properly formatted the citations using a semicolon per [[Wikipedia:Citation_overkill#How_to_group_cites|how to group cites]], which is common practice.  Excessive use of citation tags is also considered a typical red flag for other issues, such as trying to reinforce a disputed point.  This is why, as an article moves up the assessment chain, from B to GA to FA, you'll find few, if any articles, using citations in the lead or multiple citations in the body. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 19:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
5961 +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ Ninly +++$+++ 5960 +++$+++ 5960 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.303172820E09 +++$+++ My bad. I had read the bundling link, but for some reason I thought it applied to repetition of a single source, not inclusion of several. On rereading, I'm not sure where the short circuit was. Probably just too much late-night editing! Thanks for pointing out the clutter link, too; good info there. <span style=\"font-family:monospace;text-shadow:#EECC99 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em\">\/ +++$+++ :My bad. I had read the bundling link, but for some reason I thought it applied to repetition of a single source, not inclusion of several. On rereading, I'm not sure where the short circuit was. Probably just too much late-night editing! Thanks for pointing out the clutter link, too; good info there. <span style="font-family:monospace;text-shadow:#EECC99 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em">/[[User:Ninly|<span style="color:OrangeRed;">ninly</span>]]<sub>([[User talk:Ninly|<span style="color:Orange">talk</span>]])</sub></span> 17:27, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

530250 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-02 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.238719680E09 +++$+++ Delighted as ever. Especially now that I've reached the rather dizzying heights of having [http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/story\/0,2933,512050,00.html Fox News] feature my ITN contributions... however, most disappointingly, they didn't notice dear [[Phil Lynott (song)|Philip]], oh no... ;) gotta love their line, \"Every item on the home page of the user-generated site Wikipedia is fake.\" Very offensive to us all. --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ Delighted as ever. Especially now that I've reached the rather dizzying heights of having [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,512050,00.html Fox News] feature my ITN contributions... however, most disappointingly, they didn't notice dear [[Phil Lynott (song)|Philip]], oh no... ;) gotta love their line, "Every item on the home page of the user-generated site Wikipedia is fake." Very offensive to us all. --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 17:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
530251 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530250 +++$+++ 530250 +++$+++ 2009-04-02 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.238736360E09 +++$+++ Good job! I googled my nom on the [[Chili Bowl (race)]] and found it in an article on [[CNET]] [http:\/\/news.cnet.com\/8301-17939_109-10209215-2.html]. [[London Tipton|Yay, me!]] '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Good job! I googled my nom on the [[Chili Bowl (race)]] and found it in an article on [[CNET]] [http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10209215-2.html]. [[London Tipton|Yay, me!]] '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 22:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

612663 +++$+++ Debivort +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612663 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-19 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.177041480E09 +++$+++ Hi Dave - thanks for the vandalism warning (my first!). My popups reversion was a mis-clicked attempt at the reversion you had made immediately before. And as soon as I clicked it I realized I had target the wrong version, but all my hitting escape and back didn't stop popups. Well cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Dave - thanks for the vandalism warning (my first!). My popups reversion was a mis-clicked attempt at the reversion you had made immediately before. And as soon as I clicked it I realized I had target the wrong version, but all my hitting escape and back didn't stop popups. Well cheers, [[User:Debivort|Debivort]] 20:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
612664 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612663 +++$+++ 612663 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.177042140E09 +++$+++ OOps, apologies and warning removed on your page!. ..  +++$+++ :OOps, apologies and warning removed on your page!. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

530252 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530252 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-03 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.238749740E09 +++$+++ @[[Talk:Frankie Rayder\/GA1]] - we are already past the GA Hold period. I happen to agree with all of the additional points you raised, but I do think the article needs a bit more work. Perhaps the GA Review should be closed at this time to allow for a more substantial reworking than would be prudent in the GA Hold period? Cheers, ''' +++$+++ @[[Talk:Frankie Rayder/GA1]] - we are already past the GA Hold period. I happen to agree with all of the additional points you raised, but I do think the article needs a bit more work. Perhaps the GA Review should be closed at this time to allow for a more substantial reworking than would be prudent in the GA Hold period? Cheers, '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 02:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
530253 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530252 +++$+++ 530252 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.238750100E09 +++$+++ I give the other person leeway if they attempting to make progress. Especially since it takes so long to get a GA reviewed - why make it sit in bureaucracy for so long? It's ultimately your call, especially if you feel that the changes are significant. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I give the other person leeway if they attempting to make progress. Especially since it takes so long to get a GA reviewed - why make it sit in bureaucracy for so long? It's ultimately your call, especially if you feel that the changes are significant. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
530254 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530252 +++$+++ 530253 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.238750220E09 +++$+++ You seem to have good ideas and a lot of rational input and certainly a fresh view on the whole thing is welcome. I will defer to your judgment about this. How much leeway\/time would you say is appropriate? ''' +++$+++ ::You seem to have good ideas and a lot of rational input and certainly a fresh view on the whole thing is welcome. I will defer to your judgment about this. How much leeway/time would you say is appropriate? '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 02:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
530255 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530252 +++$+++ 530254 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.238750760E09 +++$+++ I would expect to see at least some progress every few days or so, except if the other party said that they're gone for the weekend or whatever. I doubt Tony wants to see the article go through another month(s) wait at GAC, so I doubt that timeliness would be an issue. I never worry about the GA Hold period if I see that someone is making reasonable and appropriate effort - [[WP:IAR]]. I suppose if it was hold for a month, but of course it probably would have started too far away from GA shape... Tony's real awesome at fixing problems like this. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::I would expect to see at least some progress every few days or so, except if the other party said that they're gone for the weekend or whatever. I doubt Tony wants to see the article go through another month(s) wait at GAC, so I doubt that timeliness would be an issue. I never worry about the GA Hold period if I see that someone is making reasonable and appropriate effort - [[WP:IAR]]. I suppose if it was hold for a month, but of course it probably would have started too far away from GA shape... Tony's real awesome at fixing problems like this. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
530256 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530252 +++$+++ 530255 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.238751000E09 +++$+++ Ah okay quite reasonable, sounds good. ''' +++$+++ ::::Ah okay quite reasonable, sounds good. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 02:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
530257 +++$+++  +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530252 +++$+++ 530256 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.238760000E09 +++$+++ Let me know what you think of the responses.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::::Let me know what you think of the responses.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 05:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
530258 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530252 +++$+++ 530257 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.238760060E09 +++$+++ I just responded that it looks good to me. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::I just responded that it looks good to me. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

5965 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-04 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.291526160E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rawhide_Kid&action=historysubmit&diff=400497192&oldid=400399987 glowing compliment]. It is much appreciated, buddy. Happy Holidays.  +++$+++ Thanks again for the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rawhide_Kid&action=historysubmit&diff=400497192&oldid=400399987 glowing compliment]. It is much appreciated, buddy. Happy Holidays. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 21:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
5966 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5965 +++$+++ 5965 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.291552980E09 +++$+++ I didn't know that about those sources. But the distinction between the name of a miniseries and the name of its story seems like an odd bit of hair-splitting. I supposed I could simply be out of the loop on those Project consensuses, but then I'm wondering why I've never heard or seen this in my time editing here. (Are these recent consensuses?) Legal technicalities notwithstanding, I just don't see why we have to overexplain the ''Sensational Seven'' subtitle. Just calling it by that entire combined name would seem to be straightforward enough. As for the biweekly and \"parts 1-5\" points, I moved the former to a different part of the sentence, and removed the latter entirely.  +++$+++ :I didn't know that about those sources. But the distinction between the name of a miniseries and the name of its story seems like an odd bit of hair-splitting. I supposed I could simply be out of the loop on those Project consensuses, but then I'm wondering why I've never heard or seen this in my time editing here. (Are these recent consensuses?) Legal technicalities notwithstanding, I just don't see why we have to overexplain the ''Sensational Seven'' subtitle. Just calling it by that entire combined name would seem to be straightforward enough. As for the biweekly and "parts 1-5" points, I moved the former to a different part of the sentence, and removed the latter entirely. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 04:43, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
5967 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5965 +++$+++ 5966 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.291610160E09 +++$+++ I wasn't so much suggesting other sources as questioning just how accurate The Unofficial Handbook of Marvel Comics Creators is. I mean, is that a wiki? Is it used in the industry? I had never heard of it before. But if you insist on these points, then I'm not going to quibble with it, since I admittedly am not that familiar with them. :-)  +++$+++ ::I wasn't so much suggesting other sources as questioning just how accurate The Unofficial Handbook of Marvel Comics Creators is. I mean, is that a wiki? Is it used in the industry? I had never heard of it before. But if you insist on these points, then I'm not going to quibble with it, since I admittedly am not that familiar with them. :-) [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 20:36, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

268111 +++$+++ 24.130.14.173 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268111 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-04 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.207357500E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/24.130.14.173|24.130.14.173]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/24.130.14.173|24.130.14.173]] ([[User talk:24.130.14.173|talk]]) 18:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268112 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268111 +++$+++ 268111 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.207358160E09 +++$+++ Well, not archiving my talk pages is not the way to go. In three weeks my talk page would be so large that my browser would crash trying to assess it. My collective talk pages are thousands and thousand of kilobytes of mostly boring stuff. If you have specific complaints about me then make those complaints. My edits are available, just as everyones are, under my contributions. Editors who have specific complaints about articles can tag those articles and register the complaint on the article talk page. What ever I have contributed to articles, I  do not [[WP:OWN|own]] them. You are free to make changes as long as they referenced per [[WP:V]]. Articles cannot be based on [[WP:OR|personal experience]].  Regards,  +++$+++ :Well, not archiving my talk pages is not the way to go. In three weeks my talk page would be so large that my browser would crash trying to assess it. My collective talk pages are thousands and thousand of kilobytes of mostly boring stuff. If you have specific complaints about me then make those complaints. My edits are available, just as everyones are, under my contributions. Editors who have specific complaints about articles can tag those articles and register the complaint on the article talk page. What ever I have contributed to articles, I  do not [[WP:OWN|own]] them. You are free to make changes as long as they referenced per [[WP:V]]. Articles cannot be based on [[WP:OR|personal experience]].  Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268113 +++$+++ 24.130.14.173 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268111 +++$+++ 268112 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.207359000E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/24.130.14.173|24.130.14.173]] ( +++$+++ ::[[Special:Contributions/24.130.14.173|24.130.14.173]] ([[User talk:24.130.14.173|talk]]) 18:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268114 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268111 +++$+++ 268113 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.207359480E09 +++$+++ Well, I had to lower the size before archiving recently as my browser could not access it without getting script messages. Many people just delete every message from their talk page as soon as they read it and have no archives. The talk page is not for review of edits in the manner you suggest. The article talk pages are for that. Maybe I will start just deleting every message I want. I usually leave them there no matter how obnoxious, but I am not required to do so.  Regards,  +++$+++ :::Well, I had to lower the size before archiving recently as my browser could not access it without getting script messages. Many people just delete every message from their talk page as soon as they read it and have no archives. The talk page is not for review of edits in the manner you suggest. The article talk pages are for that. Maybe I will start just deleting every message I want. I usually leave them there no matter how obnoxious, but I am not required to do so.  Regards, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268115 +++$+++ 24.130.14.173 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268111 +++$+++ 268114 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.207361880E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/24.130.14.173|24.130.14.173]] ( +++$+++ ::::[[Special:Contributions/24.130.14.173|24.130.14.173]] ([[User talk:24.130.14.173|talk]]) 19:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268116 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268111 +++$+++ 268115 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.207362660E09 +++$+++ That is your opinion. If you think it is a problem for Wikipedia, seek opinions about it through their may ways of dealing with conflicts between editiors. Look under help. There is [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], [[Wikipedia:Mediation|mediation]], [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment|request for comment]] and [[Wikipedia:Arbitration policy|arbitration]].  Please do not post on my talk page anymore.  +++$+++ :::::That is your opinion. If you think it is a problem for Wikipedia, seek opinions about it through their may ways of dealing with conflicts between editiors. Look under help. There is [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], [[Wikipedia:Mediation|mediation]], [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment|request for comment]] and [[Wikipedia:Arbitration policy|arbitration]].  Please do not post on my talk page anymore. [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
268117 +++$+++ 24.130.14.173 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268111 +++$+++ 268116 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.207364940E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/24.130.14.173|24.130.14.173]] ( +++$+++ ::::::[[Special:Contributions/24.130.14.173|24.130.14.173]] ([[User talk:24.130.14.173|talk]]) 20:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

5968 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5968 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-05 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.291622160E09 +++$+++ Ditto. Btw, I've been meaning to ask about this at the Project Page for some time now, but since it's sometimes hard to keep a conversation going consistently there, and since it bears on the issue of sources: Can I presume it's okay to rely on the ''Official Index to the Marvel Universe''? It's written entirely in an out-universe perspective, unlike the in-universe OHOTMU, so I think it should be allowable.  +++$+++ Ditto. Btw, I've been meaning to ask about this at the Project Page for some time now, but since it's sometimes hard to keep a conversation going consistently there, and since it bears on the issue of sources: Can I presume it's okay to rely on the ''Official Index to the Marvel Universe''? It's written entirely in an out-universe perspective, unlike the in-universe OHOTMU, so I think it should be allowable. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 23:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
5969 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5968 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-06 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.291680480E09 +++$+++ Should I start a consensus discussion on the Project page to have it more formally codified?  +++$+++ ::Should I start a consensus discussion on the Project page to have it more formally codified? [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 16:08, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
5970 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5968 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-06 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.291689420E09 +++$+++ Awesome. I've [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Official Index to the Marvel Universe|started the discussion]].  +++$+++ :::Awesome. I've [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Official Index to the Marvel Universe|started the discussion]]. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 18:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

530259 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530259 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-03 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.238768100E09 +++$+++ I pretty much don't have anything else to add - why don't you finish up the review. ''' +++$+++ I pretty much don't have anything else to add - why don't you finish up the review. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
530260 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530259 +++$+++ 530259 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.238785740E09 +++$+++ I was done. I hope I commented on all of your points. I won't be around here very much until about 2 days from now. Maybe for just a few minutes, but that'll be it. Please don't wait for me. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I was done. I hope I commented on all of your points. I won't be around here very much until about 2 days from now. Maybe for just a few minutes, but that'll be it. Please don't wait for me. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
530261 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530259 +++$+++ 530260 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.238814300E09 +++$+++ I do not quite feel comfortable passing this article as a GA myself, but if you wish to, like I said above, I will defer to you on it. It still has not had a copyedit and improvement with respect to flow from a previously uninvolved editor. The body of the text first introduces the fact that the individual has a notable sister way down in the ''Personal and family'' section - this is inappropriate as chronologically, she has had a sister and a \"family\" for quite some time - some of this material needs to be moved into the ''Early years'' section (which should ideally read ''Early life'' or ''Early life and family'', instead). I still think that ''Notable affiliations and appearances'' appears chronologically out of order in the article's body text as well, and should be merged into ''Career highlights'' - but \"highlights\" is an odd title for a subsection, perhaps simply \"Career\" with two sub-subsection breaks for periods of time. These are all reasons why the article ''still'' has odd flow and chronological problems. But like I said, if you disagree with this stuff and feel like these points (which I had already raised at the GA review subpage a few times) are not an issue - feel free to pass the article as GA yourself. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ ::I do not quite feel comfortable passing this article as a GA myself, but if you wish to, like I said above, I will defer to you on it. It still has not had a copyedit and improvement with respect to flow from a previously uninvolved editor. The body of the text first introduces the fact that the individual has a notable sister way down in the ''Personal and family'' section - this is inappropriate as chronologically, she has had a sister and a "family" for quite some time - some of this material needs to be moved into the ''Early years'' section (which should ideally read ''Early life'' or ''Early life and family'', instead). I still think that ''Notable affiliations and appearances'' appears chronologically out of order in the article's body text as well, and should be merged into ''Career highlights'' - but "highlights" is an odd title for a subsection, perhaps simply "Career" with two sub-subsection breaks for periods of time. These are all reasons why the article ''still'' has odd flow and chronological problems. But like I said, if you disagree with this stuff and feel like these points (which I had already raised at the GA review subpage a few times) are not an issue - feel free to pass the article as GA yourself. Cheers, '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
530262 +++$+++  +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530259 +++$+++ 530261 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.239005280E09 +++$+++ Feel free to give this another look.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::Feel free to give this another look.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 01:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
530263 +++$+++  +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530259 +++$+++ 530262 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.239009240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking the time to do render a second opinion and give good guidance.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::Thanks for taking the time to do render a second opinion and give good guidance.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 02:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
530264 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530259 +++$+++ 530263 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.239009360E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! I hope that it has helped to improve the article. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::You're welcome! I hope that it has helped to improve the article. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:16, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

268119 +++$+++ Ironholds +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268119 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-05 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.207450800E09 +++$+++ thanks for editing this page; you appear to have edited a tag claiming \"The plot summary in this article or section is too long or detailed compared to the rest of the article\". Since the article is about an episode of a television series, surely it should be EXPECTED to be the main focus. i've left the tag, if you can explain your reasoning i'll shush about it. thanks!  +++$+++ thanks for editing this page; you appear to have edited a tag claiming "The plot summary in this article or section is too long or detailed compared to the rest of the article". Since the article is about an episode of a television series, surely it should be EXPECTED to be the main focus. i've left the tag, if you can explain your reasoning i'll shush about it. thanks! [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 20:00, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
268120 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268119 +++$+++ 268119 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.207451580E09 +++$+++ The best thing for you  to do to get an idea of how to write an aricle on fiction is read [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)]]. Overall the messages is that Wikipedia is an  encyclopedia and articles must be encyclopedic in nature. Specifically, plot summaries are   discussed here [[WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information]]. Regards, &ndash; +++$+++ :The best thing for you  to do to get an idea of how to write an aricle on fiction is read [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)]]. Overall the messages is that Wikipedia is an  encyclopedia and articles must be encyclopedic in nature. Specifically, plot summaries are   discussed here [[WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information]]. Regards, &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

5977 +++$+++ 108.69.80.49 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-27 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.293457260E09 +++$+++ It's a fasinating series about [[Jeffrey Mace]], both as the Patriot and as the third Captain America, and deals with characters that were important in his life, such as [[Miss Patriot]], Golden Girl, Fred Davis. [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.49|108.69.80.49]] ( +++$+++ It's a fasinating series about [[Jeffrey Mace]], both as the Patriot and as the third Captain America, and deals with characters that were important in his life, such as [[Miss Patriot]], Golden Girl, Fred Davis. [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.49|108.69.80.49]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.49|talk]]) 05:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
5978 +++$+++ 108.69.80.49 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5977 +++$+++ 5977 +++$+++ 2010-12-27 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.293457500E09 +++$+++ Yeah, the Ross connection was a neat Easter egg. :)  Happy editing! [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.49|108.69.80.49]] ( +++$+++ :Yeah, the Ross connection was a neat Easter egg. :)  Happy editing! [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.49|108.69.80.49]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.49|talk]]) 05:45, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

268122 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-06 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.207508880E09 +++$+++ Heheheh...thanks. &mdash; +++$+++ Heheheh...thanks. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 12:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
268123 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268122 +++$+++ 268122 +++$+++ 2008-04-06 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.207509240E09 +++$+++ BTW, [[Coconut Island]] would be a very easy DYK if you are interested.  There's loads of info about it online.  It's also very interesting across the board, from history to science.  Take a look, it might be something you would enjoy. &mdash; +++$+++ :BTW, [[Coconut Island]] would be a very easy DYK if you are interested.  There's loads of info about it online.  It's also very interesting across the board, from history to science.  Take a look, it might be something you would enjoy. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 12:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
268124 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268122 +++$+++ 268123 +++$+++ 2008-04-06 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.207509780E09 +++$+++ O.K. I'll give it a try. &ndash; +++$+++ ::O.K. I'll give it a try. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
268125 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268122 +++$+++ 268124 +++$+++ 2008-04-06 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.207510020E09 +++$+++ Do you have any suggestions as to sources? It's already over 2000, so I would have to add at least 8,000, and glancing at the online stuff, it seems most of it is already in the article.  &ndash; +++$+++ :::Do you have any suggestions as to sources? It's already over 2000, so I would have to add at least 8,000, and glancing at the online stuff, it seems most of it is already in the article.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
268126 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268122 +++$+++ 268125 +++$+++ 2008-04-06 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.207514760E09 +++$+++ You can start by looking at [[K\u0101ne'ohe Bay]].  That will give you some perspective of how to lead-in, as the island is the largest of five within the bay.  That article also provide some tips on geology: ''Coconut Island is an isolated volcanic remnant located in the southwest part of the bay.''  I'm sure the USGS has something on this, but I haven't found it yet.  The secret of doing research on niche topics like this is not to directly search for information about the main topic, but to search by subtopic.  You can find a lot of info this way.  But to search for these subtopics, you need to pull them out of the general info links first: [http:\/\/www.hawaii.edu\/HIMB\/history.html], [http:\/\/www.islandscene.com\/Article.aspx?id=3209], [http:\/\/www.hawaii.edu\/ssri\/hcri\/research\/results\/oahu\/moku_o_loe.shtml#3a], [http:\/\/www.bishopmuseum.org\/media\/2007\/pr07096.html], [http:\/\/www3.hpu.edu\/kalamalama\/archive\/2507\/sub\/Science01.htm]  So, if you start with Christian Holmes, you get Christiaan Klieger's ''The Fleischmann Yeast Family'' as a source on GBooks - with info about Holmes and Coconut Island.  And if you keep doing this for every subtopic, you get more and more sources.  Try [[Edwin W. Pauley]] and you get [http:\/\/www.soest.hawaii.edu\/UHMEnergy\/Campus%20Energy%20Projects\/Coconut%20Island.html this] and many more.  Keep doing that for every subtopic and you'll have enough material.  The only issue is the early Hawaiian and geological history, which you may have to get directly from print material, which I may be able to find for you by Monday. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::You can start by looking at [[Kāne'ohe Bay]].  That will give you some perspective of how to lead-in, as the island is the largest of five within the bay.  That article also provide some tips on geology: ''Coconut Island is an isolated volcanic remnant located in the southwest part of the bay.''  I'm sure the USGS has something on this, but I haven't found it yet.  The secret of doing research on niche topics like this is not to directly search for information about the main topic, but to search by subtopic.  You can find a lot of info this way.  But to search for these subtopics, you need to pull them out of the general info links first: [http://www.hawaii.edu/HIMB/history.html], [http://www.islandscene.com/Article.aspx?id=3209], [http://www.hawaii.edu/ssri/hcri/research/results/oahu/moku_o_loe.shtml#3a], [http://www.bishopmuseum.org/media/2007/pr07096.html], [http://www3.hpu.edu/kalamalama/archive/2507/sub/Science01.htm]  So, if you start with Christian Holmes, you get Christiaan Klieger's ''The Fleischmann Yeast Family'' as a source on GBooks - with info about Holmes and Coconut Island.  And if you keep doing this for every subtopic, you get more and more sources.  Try [[Edwin W. Pauley]] and you get [http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/UHMEnergy/Campus%20Energy%20Projects/Coconut%20Island.html this] and many more.  Keep doing that for every subtopic and you'll have enough material.  The only issue is the early Hawaiian and geological history, which you may have to get directly from print material, which I may be able to find for you by Monday. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 13:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
268127 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268122 +++$+++ 268126 +++$+++ 2008-04-06 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.207548240E09 +++$+++ I just noticed this message now. Do not know why I did not see it before. Maybe I thought it was MizaBotIII. I will examine it more closely tommorrow.  &ndash; +++$+++ :::::I just noticed this message now. Do not know why I did not see it before. Maybe I thought it was MizaBotIII. I will examine it more closely tommorrow.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:04, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

5979 +++$+++ Ashanda +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-01 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.293926580E09 +++$+++ Do you really think it is appropriate to issue warnings to an editor when they have committed no disruption since they got a previous warning? You did just that to [[User_talk:71.184.156.63|71.184.156.63]] who had not even made another edit since the warning I issued. Did you perhaps think my warning was [[WP:BITE|too friendly]]?  +++$+++ Do you really think it is appropriate to issue warnings to an editor when they have committed no disruption since they got a previous warning? You did just that to [[User_talk:71.184.156.63|71.184.156.63]] who had not even made another edit since the warning I issued. Did you perhaps think my warning was [[WP:BITE|too friendly]]? [[User:Ashanda|Ashanda]] ([[User talk:Ashanda|talk]]) 16:03, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
5980 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5979 +++$+++ 5979 +++$+++ 2011-01-01 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.293927660E09 +++$+++ Not sure I understand. I was agreeing with [[User:Cresix]] about an IP address with several warnings at its talk page and whose edits for days have been non-constructive \/ vandalizing. -- +++$+++ :Not sure I understand. I was agreeing with [[User:Cresix]] about an IP address with several warnings at its talk page and whose edits for days have been non-constructive / vandalizing. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 16:21, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
5981 +++$+++ Ashanda +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5979 +++$+++ 5980 +++$+++ 2011-01-01 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.293928980E09 +++$+++ I hope you don't mind my copying your reply back to here, I dislike disjointed conversations. I am referring to the fact that I reverted that user's edits and wrote a note\/warning after which the user made no further edits, then {{user|Cresix}} and yourself issued further warnings even though no disruption had occured since the warning I wrote. I do give you both credit that you didn't just throw another template down on the user talk page, but don't you think it is wrong to issue repeated corrections to a person who has committed no further disruption?-- +++$+++ ::I hope you don't mind my copying your reply back to here, I dislike disjointed conversations. I am referring to the fact that I reverted that user's edits and wrote a note/warning after which the user made no further edits, then {{user|Cresix}} and yourself issued further warnings even though no disruption had occured since the warning I wrote. I do give you both credit that you didn't just throw another template down on the user talk page, but don't you think it is wrong to issue repeated corrections to a person who has committed no further disruption?--[[User:Ashanda|Ashanda]] ([[User talk:Ashanda|talk]]) 16:43, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
5982 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5979 +++$+++ 5981 +++$+++ 2011-01-01 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.293930120E09 +++$+++ May I please mention, however, that I find your term \"Hogpiling\" perhaps a bit untoward itself, as it connotes boorish behavior and absolute guilt before giving the parties you accuse a chance to offer rationale and explanation. I'm sure you didn't overtly intend it this way, and were only being colorful and attention-getting, but it can be read as an offensive addition to one's talk page. If you would choose to be collegial and remove it, I think that would be in keeping with the overall tenor to which we try to adhere.-- +++$+++ :::May I please mention, however, that I find your term "Hogpiling" perhaps a bit untoward itself, as it connotes boorish behavior and absolute guilt before giving the parties you accuse a chance to offer rationale and explanation. I'm sure you didn't overtly intend it this way, and were only being colorful and attention-getting, but it can be read as an offensive addition to one's talk page. If you would choose to be collegial and remove it, I think that would be in keeping with the overall tenor to which we try to adhere.--[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 17:02, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
5983 +++$+++ Ashanda +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5979 +++$+++ 5982 +++$+++ 2011-01-01 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.293932940E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I have modified the section title per your most reasonable request. Actually the timeframe on the user's editing pattern goes back to October 2010 when they decided to remove biblical references from the history section of [[Vinegar]] for the first time. Their edits before that and even after that seem to be legit to me, at least until December. Since the negative template warning approach seemed to have the opposite affect than was intended, and since the user showed a certain amout of good edits too, I wanted to try a more friendly approach to see if that would work. However I do not agree that repeated warnings in the absence of continued disruption is ever appropriate or even productive - it's like repeatedly slapping a puppy for piddling on the floor or having three different people yell at a kid if he forgot to wipe his feet when he came in from outside. It may even lead to an increase in disruptive behavior. Anyways, that's my wandering opinion, for what it's worth (maybe two cents). I am glad we could have this conversation. Have a happy new year! -- +++$+++ ::::Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I have modified the section title per your most reasonable request. Actually the timeframe on the user's editing pattern goes back to October 2010 when they decided to remove biblical references from the history section of [[Vinegar]] for the first time. Their edits before that and even after that seem to be legit to me, at least until December. Since the negative template warning approach seemed to have the opposite affect than was intended, and since the user showed a certain amout of good edits too, I wanted to try a more friendly approach to see if that would work. However I do not agree that repeated warnings in the absence of continued disruption is ever appropriate or even productive - it's like repeatedly slapping a puppy for piddling on the floor or having three different people yell at a kid if he forgot to wipe his feet when he came in from outside. It may even lead to an increase in disruptive behavior. Anyways, that's my wandering opinion, for what it's worth (maybe two cents). I am glad we could have this conversation. Have a happy new year! --[[User:Ashanda|Ashanda]] ([[User talk:Ashanda|talk]]) 17:49, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

530268 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-04 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.238843220E09 +++$+++ Another update due, from [[T:DYK\/Q1|queue 1]]. I can do credits.  +++$+++ Another update due, from [[T:DYK/Q1|queue 1]]. I can do credits. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 04:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
530269 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530268 +++$+++ 530268 +++$+++ 2009-04-04 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.238843400E09 +++$+++ Yes, please credit. I'll work on it. I'm at my sister's house, so it'll take me longer. The screen resolution is very poor. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Yes, please credit. I'll work on it. I'm at my sister's house, so it'll take me longer. The screen resolution is very poor. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
530270 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530268 +++$+++ 530269 +++$+++ 2009-04-04 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.238844180E09 +++$+++ Thank you!  +++$+++ ::Thank you! [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 04:23, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
530271 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530268 +++$+++ 530270 +++$+++ 2009-04-04 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.238844300E09 +++$+++ Thank you! This would have been very hard to do alone. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Thank you! This would have been very hard to do alone. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:25, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
530272 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530268 +++$+++ 530271 +++$+++ 2009-04-04 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.238844540E09 +++$+++ The best projects are collaborative :)  +++$+++ ::::The best projects are collaborative :) [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 04:29, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

268128 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268128 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-07 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.207554420E09 +++$+++ That was very sharp of you to start working on the subtopic instead; You have good instincts.  Now, instead of one DYK, you will probably turn it into five!  As for the [[Northwestern Hawaiian Islands]], no, the institute is not located there, but they do study species that are endemic to it, and they probably have a habitat setup to reproduce some aspects of it, hence the confusion. To read more about where the institute is located, see [[Oahu]].  Also, you can see the name of the island in their [http:\/\/www.hawaii.edu\/HIMB\/images\/himb_logo_bluegreen1.gif logo] (Coconut Island, Oahu).&mdash; +++$+++ That was very sharp of you to start working on the subtopic instead; You have good instincts.  Now, instead of one DYK, you will probably turn it into five!  As for the [[Northwestern Hawaiian Islands]], no, the institute is not located there, but they do study species that are endemic to it, and they probably have a habitat setup to reproduce some aspects of it, hence the confusion. To read more about where the institute is located, see [[Oahu]].  Also, you can see the name of the island in their [http://www.hawaii.edu/HIMB/images/himb_logo_bluegreen1.gif logo] (Coconut Island, Oahu).&mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 00:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268129 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268128 +++$+++ 268128 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.207555200E09 +++$+++ FYI, the [[Northwestern Hawaiian Islands]] article explains which islands are covered by the designation. &mdash; +++$+++ :FYI, the [[Northwestern Hawaiian Islands]] article explains which islands are covered by the designation. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 01:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

5985 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5985 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-03 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.294050720E09 +++$+++ Thanks. It all seemed like pretty obvious info that was surprisingly lacking. Then again, I have [[In Utero (album)|plenty]] [[Reckoning (R.E.M. album)|of]] [[R.E.M.|experience]] writing lead sections, so picking out the essential details for leads is pretty intuitive for me at this point.  +++$+++ Thanks. It all seemed like pretty obvious info that was surprisingly lacking. Then again, I have [[In Utero (album)|plenty]] [[Reckoning (R.E.M. album)|of]] [[R.E.M.|experience]] writing lead sections, so picking out the essential details for leads is pretty intuitive for me at this point. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 02:32, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
5986 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5985 +++$+++ 5985 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.294051560E09 +++$+++ By the way, if you wish, I'd recommend using that lead I wrote for ''Amazing Spider-Man'' as a template for other comic book title articles. You can essentially copy it and tweak the details where necessary.  +++$+++ :By the way, if you wish, I'd recommend using that lead I wrote for ''Amazing Spider-Man'' as a template for other comic book title articles. You can essentially copy it and tweak the details where necessary. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 02:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
5987 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5985 +++$+++ 5986 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.294052520E09 +++$+++ I've long maintained that the best examples of plot summaries to be found on Wikipedia are those found in film articles. The Film WikiProject is one of the most prolific and high-quality WikiProjects here, and checking out their best articles is a fine way to get an idea of how to write an article on similar storytelling mediums.  +++$+++ ::I've long maintained that the best examples of plot summaries to be found on Wikipedia are those found in film articles. The Film WikiProject is one of the most prolific and high-quality WikiProjects here, and checking out their best articles is a fine way to get an idea of how to write an article on similar storytelling mediums. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 03:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

268130 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ One possible improvement would be a picture, especially if it is like [http:\/\/www.hawaii.edu\/HIMB\/images\/mmrp1.jpg the stunning image] on HIMB's homepage. <span style=\"font: 13pt 'Arial';\">\xab<\/span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D. Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style=\"color: #000;\">talk<\/span>]])''' 00:47 [[2008]] [[April 7]] (UTC) +++$+++ One possible improvement would be a picture, especially if it is like [http://www.hawaii.edu/HIMB/images/mmrp1.jpg the stunning image] on HIMB's homepage. <span style="font: 13pt 'Arial';">«</span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D. Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style="color: #000;">talk</span>]])''' 00:47 [[2008]] [[April 7]] (UTC)
268131 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268130 +++$+++ 268130 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.207554660E09 +++$+++ Yes, that would be wonderful. But what is the status of the picture. Is it PD? &ndash; +++$+++ :Yes, that would be wonderful. But what is the status of the picture. Is it PD? &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268132 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268130 +++$+++ 268131 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Usually what I do, though, is contact the organization to ask if the picture is more liberally licensed. <span style=\"font: 13pt 'Arial';\">\xab<\/span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D. Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style=\"color: #000;\">talk<\/span>]])''' 01:05 [[2008]] [[April 7]] (UTC) +++$+++ ::Usually what I do, though, is contact the organization to ask if the picture is more liberally licensed. <span style="font: 13pt 'Arial';">«</span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D. Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style="color: #000;">talk</span>]])''' 01:05 [[2008]] [[April 7]] (UTC)
268133 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268130 +++$+++ 268131 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Never mind. I found a good one (Creative Commons BY-ND, too). Just a few minutes... <span style=\"font: 13pt 'Arial';\">\xab<\/span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D. Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style=\"color: #000;\">talk<\/span>]])''' 01:12 [[2008]] [[April 7]] (UTC) +++$+++ ::Never mind. I found a good one (Creative Commons BY-ND, too). Just a few minutes... <span style="font: 13pt 'Arial';">«</span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D. Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style="color: #000;">talk</span>]])''' 01:12 [[2008]] [[April 7]] (UTC)
268134 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268130 +++$+++ 268133 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.207555980E09 +++$+++ Great! That is wonderful of you. &ndash; +++$+++ :::Great! That is wonderful of you. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268135 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268130 +++$+++ 268134 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ <span style=\"font: 13pt 'Arial';\">\xab<\/span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D. Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style=\"color: #000;\">talk<\/span>]])''' 01:16 [[2008]] [[April 7]] (UTC) +++$+++ ::::<span style="font: 13pt 'Arial';">«</span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D. Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style="color: #000;">talk</span>]])''' 01:16 [[2008]] [[April 7]] (UTC)

5988 +++$+++ Damiantgordon +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-03 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.294107840E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your editing of my section about \"Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story\" in \"[[The Green Hornet (TV series)]]\" article. I clearly had expressed the scene incorrectly and it read like WP:PEACOCK -- I definitely wasn't trying to big up Bruce Lee\/Jason Scott Lee, but rather I was trying to indicate than in the movie the fictional cast and crew were not just impressed, but rather stunned (and the stuntmen seemed afraid) by Bruce Lee's fighting skills, I'm not sure how to express it better, but I definitely think the current version doesn't quiet capture the tenor of the scene.  +++$+++ Many thanks for your editing of my section about "Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story" in "[[The Green Hornet (TV series)]]" article. I clearly had expressed the scene incorrectly and it read like WP:PEACOCK -- I definitely wasn't trying to big up Bruce Lee/Jason Scott Lee, but rather I was trying to indicate than in the movie the fictional cast and crew were not just impressed, but rather stunned (and the stuntmen seemed afraid) by Bruce Lee's fighting skills, I'm not sure how to express it better, but I definitely think the current version doesn't quiet capture the tenor of the scene. [[User:Damiantgordon|Damiantgordon]] ([[User talk:Damiantgordon|talk]]) 18:24, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
5989 +++$+++ Damiantgordon +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5988 +++$+++ 5988 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.294110180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help, you're a gent!  +++$+++ :Thanks for the help, you're a gent! [[User:Damiantgordon|Damiantgordon]] ([[User talk:Damiantgordon|talk]]) 19:03, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

268136 +++$+++ Mr. IP +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268136 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-05 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.207411140E09 +++$+++ Not to step on your toes, but I think we should work with the [[saudade]] article more subtly.  It does seem to involve OR, but it's also a decent article, rather than a passel of falsehoods.  I think we can get it sourced and otherwise verified without so many tags.  +++$+++ Not to step on your toes, but I think we should work with the [[saudade]] article more subtly.  It does seem to involve OR, but it's also a decent article, rather than a passel of falsehoods.  I think we can get it sourced and otherwise verified without so many tags. [[User:Mr. IP|Mr. IP]] ([[User talk:Mr. IP|talk]]) 08:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
268137 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268136 +++$+++ 268136 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.207423080E09 +++$+++ Especially the OR and at least some general notice that the article is largely unreferenced and unverified is in order. If you do not replace at least some of the tags then I will have to. Please be a responsible wikipedia editor. Regards,   +++$+++ :Especially the OR and at least some general notice that the article is largely unreferenced and unverified is in order. If you do not replace at least some of the tags then I will have to. Please be a responsible wikipedia editor. Regards,  [[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
268138 +++$+++ Mr. IP +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268136 +++$+++ 268137 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.207656840E09 +++$+++ I'm not trying to remove all tags from this article - I'm noting that a blanket template on the article itself is less disruptive than tagging every paragraph.  What does \"Please be a responsible wikipedia editor\" mean?  Am I reading that the wrong way?  Are you implying that I acted irresponsibly by disagreeing with you?  That a dispute over which or how many tags are appropriate is equivalent to removing tags without fixing the article?  Why assume bad faith?  +++$+++ ::I'm not trying to remove all tags from this article - I'm noting that a blanket template on the article itself is less disruptive than tagging every paragraph.  What does "Please be a responsible wikipedia editor" mean?  Am I reading that the wrong way?  Are you implying that I acted irresponsibly by disagreeing with you?  That a dispute over which or how many tags are appropriate is equivalent to removing tags without fixing the article?  Why assume bad faith? [[User:Mr. IP|Mr. IP]] ([[User talk:Mr. IP|talk]]) 05:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

5993 +++$+++ REVUpminster +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-05 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.294256340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:REVUpminster|REVUpminster]] ([[User talk:REVUpminster|talk]]) 11:39, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
5994 +++$+++ Aidoflight +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5993 +++$+++ 5993 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.294287000E09 +++$+++ I don't know what to do. I'm already not editing the page, and, seriously, what does David himself want of me? That everyone who edits an article in a fashion he doesn't like has to go? Would my leaving Wikipedia permanently be the only option to satisfy him, especially as he has continued raving and complaining against me? I don't know much about this user, but if, as you yourself claimed, he has had difficulties interacting with other editors here in the past many times, even ''if'' I go, well, it's very, very likely he will continue to involve himself in conflicts, deliberately or not, with many other users in the future. I'm sorry to bother you with something as juvenile as this, Tenebrae, but, seriously, Dave really does need to change his attitude if he wants to effectively contribute to Wikipedia...  +++$+++ :I don't know what to do. I'm already not editing the page, and, seriously, what does David himself want of me? That everyone who edits an article in a fashion he doesn't like has to go? Would my leaving Wikipedia permanently be the only option to satisfy him, especially as he has continued raving and complaining against me? I don't know much about this user, but if, as you yourself claimed, he has had difficulties interacting with other editors here in the past many times, even ''if'' I go, well, it's very, very likely he will continue to involve himself in conflicts, deliberately or not, with many other users in the future. I'm sorry to bother you with something as juvenile as this, Tenebrae, but, seriously, Dave really does need to change his attitude if he wants to effectively contribute to Wikipedia... [[User:Aidoflight|Aidoflight]] ([[User talk:Aidoflight|talk]]) 20:10, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
5995 +++$+++ David A +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5993 +++$+++ 5993 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.294288860E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I apologise if I've come across as more impatient or grumpy than usual. It used to take much longer time, but regrettably I'm more or less in a perpetural state of it nowadays. In an any case, I did remove all of the parts that you made specific notes about, so it isn't like I haven't attempted to compromise.  +++$+++ :Anyway, I apologise if I've come across as more impatient or grumpy than usual. It used to take much longer time, but regrettably I'm more or less in a perpetural state of it nowadays. In an any case, I did remove all of the parts that you made specific notes about, so it isn't like I haven't attempted to compromise. [[User:David A|Dave]] ([[User talk:David A|talk]]) 20:41, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
5996 +++$+++ Aidoflight +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5993 +++$+++ 5995 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.294293720E09 +++$+++ David, I did ''not'' say anything at all about torture fantasies. Whatever my religion is, I have not stated my own beliefs here, and, what is more, this discussion is about Chaos War. And, in truth, the Satan-being in Chaos War did ''indeed'' say just that, disturbing his words may be to some; I can try to post comic scans and links if you require verification, but it may take a little while. I wrote that the realm Heaven was a world where the souls of the pure and virtuous are generally committed to upon physical death; that was a generic description. Heaven has indeed shown up and been mentioned in-continuity, and, indeed that is the general consensus, supported by canon. One did not see hordes of super-villains, for instance, the time Ben Grimm was shown in this afterlife realm. But, all in all, you have since '''removed''' that, and many of my other edits, so what's, like, your problem now, no offense? And this is '''not relevant'''. At all. So, please, David, as a huge favor...can you not post here for a while, and maybe give Tenebrae a chance to respond? I have stopped editing on Chaos War talk page for fear of inciting you to further accuse me of supporting torture fantasies and Nazi ideologies, so...  +++$+++ ::David, I did ''not'' say anything at all about torture fantasies. Whatever my religion is, I have not stated my own beliefs here, and, what is more, this discussion is about Chaos War. And, in truth, the Satan-being in Chaos War did ''indeed'' say just that, disturbing his words may be to some; I can try to post comic scans and links if you require verification, but it may take a little while. I wrote that the realm Heaven was a world where the souls of the pure and virtuous are generally committed to upon physical death; that was a generic description. Heaven has indeed shown up and been mentioned in-continuity, and, indeed that is the general consensus, supported by canon. One did not see hordes of super-villains, for instance, the time Ben Grimm was shown in this afterlife realm. But, all in all, you have since '''removed''' that, and many of my other edits, so what's, like, your problem now, no offense? And this is '''not relevant'''. At all. So, please, David, as a huge favor...can you not post here for a while, and maybe give Tenebrae a chance to respond? I have stopped editing on Chaos War talk page for fear of inciting you to further accuse me of supporting torture fantasies and Nazi ideologies, so... [[User:Aidoflight|Aidoflight]] ([[User talk:Aidoflight|talk]]) 22:02, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
5997 +++$+++ David A +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5993 +++$+++ 5996 +++$+++ 2011-01-06 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.294338840E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm more than willing to take a step back, and apologise if I have misunderstood your intentions.  +++$+++ :::Well, I'm more than willing to take a step back, and apologise if I have misunderstood your intentions. [[User:David A|Dave]] ([[User talk:David A|talk]]) 10:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
5998 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 5993 +++$+++ 5996 +++$+++ 2011-01-06 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.294302420E09 +++$+++ Let's go the Chaos War talk page, where this really should be. -- +++$+++ :::Let's go the Chaos War talk page, where this really should be. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 00:27, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

268139 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268139 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-07 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.207580100E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, please consider my earlier offer of joining the Hawaii WikiProject.  We really need an editor like yourself to help the project expand stubs and submit DYK's.  Additionally, we have a watchlist which would enable you to watch these articles for vandalism, oversee stub expansions by other editors, help or encourage them to submit DYK's, and invite new editors to the project.  We would even like you to write a little bit about how to write a good DYK for the newsletter.  I think with your help, and perhaps a team of editors working with you, we could cut the stubs down from 600 to 300 in a matter of six months.  If I created a subpage in the project for this use, you could even make recommendations to us as to which stubs you feel we should spend our time on, and which you think would be best nominated for deletion or handed over to other projects.  Basically, I would like you to lead a team on this.  Don't worry about having all the resources or information available.  I'm going to make an effort to add a resource page to the project for that very purpose.  Please think about it; We really need your help.  &mdash; +++$+++ Mattisse, please consider my earlier offer of joining the Hawaii WikiProject.  We really need an editor like yourself to help the project expand stubs and submit DYK's.  Additionally, we have a watchlist which would enable you to watch these articles for vandalism, oversee stub expansions by other editors, help or encourage them to submit DYK's, and invite new editors to the project.  We would even like you to write a little bit about how to write a good DYK for the newsletter.  I think with your help, and perhaps a team of editors working with you, we could cut the stubs down from 600 to 300 in a matter of six months.  If I created a subpage in the project for this use, you could even make recommendations to us as to which stubs you feel we should spend our time on, and which you think would be best nominated for deletion or handed over to other projects.  Basically, I would like you to lead a team on this.  Don't worry about having all the resources or information available.  I'm going to make an effort to add a resource page to the project for that very purpose.  Please think about it; We really need your help.  &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 07:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268140 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268139 +++$+++ 268139 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.207606440E09 +++$+++ O.K. I would like to join. Just don't expect too much of me. I don't have control of my time often plus my brain gets fried.  I just got a DYK on [['Opaeka'a Falls]] so that is two DYK's in a row for Hawaii! Also, I nominated [[Hawai`i Institute of Marine Biology]] on April 6.  &ndash; +++$+++ :O.K. I would like to join. Just don't expect too much of me. I don't have control of my time often plus my brain gets fried.  I just got a DYK on [['Opaeka'a Falls]] so that is two DYK's in a row for Hawaii! Also, I nominated [[Hawai`i Institute of Marine Biology]] on April 6.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268141 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268139 +++$+++ 268140 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.207632060E09 +++$+++ Fantastic!  I have no expectations; please work at your own pace.  What I hope to do is put a team together, so that if either one of you needs help with anything, we can all depend on each other.  But, I must admit, I don't think we will ever find anyone like you.  I'm surprised at how fast you work.  What's your secret? &mdash; +++$+++ ::Fantastic!  I have no expectations; please work at your own pace.  What I hope to do is put a team together, so that if either one of you needs help with anything, we can all depend on each other.  But, I must admit, I don't think we will ever find anyone like you.  I'm surprised at how fast you work.  What's your secret? &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 22:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

568978 +++$+++ Arthur Ellis +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568978 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-21 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.161494520E09 +++$+++ In the arbitration workshop for [[Rachel Marsden]], Fred Bauder says this page can be put up for speedy delete. Now, I don't know why he didn't do it himself, and you may or may not want to do it after looking at the arbcom page. +++$+++ In the arbitration workshop for [[Rachel Marsden]], Fred Bauder says this page can be put up for speedy delete. Now, I don't know why he didn't do it himself, and you may or may not want to do it after looking at the arbcom page.[[User:Arthur Ellis|Arthur Ellis]] 22:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
568979 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568978 +++$+++ 568978 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.161494880E09 +++$+++ Please sign your comments with four tildes, <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki> to enable editors to respond easily. The page wasn't a redirect, it contained a link to the correct article.  The search engine on WP is efficient enough to find the article without additional characters, as is google.  +++$+++ :Please sign your comments with four tildes, <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> to enable editors to respond easily. The page wasn't a redirect, it contained a link to the correct article.  The search engine on WP is efficient enough to find the article without additional characters, as is google. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
568980 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568978 +++$+++ 568978 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.161498180E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/search?num=20&hl=en&safe=off&q=albert%2Beinstein&btnG=Search&meta= Google search results for ''albert+einstein'' = 19.9 million], with the WP article in third place; [http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/search?hl=en&q=albert+einstein&btnG=Google+Search&meta= Google search results for ''albert einstein'' = 19.9 million] with the Wiki article again in third place again.  No one is going to be annoyed with the results of their searches.  +++$+++ :[http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=20&hl=en&safe=off&q=albert%2Beinstein&btnG=Search&meta= Google search results for ''albert+einstein'' = 19.9 million], with the WP article in third place; [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=albert+einstein&btnG=Google+Search&meta= Google search results for ''albert einstein'' = 19.9 million] with the Wiki article again in third place again.  No one is going to be annoyed with the results of their searches. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
568981 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568978 +++$+++ 568978 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.161497820E09 +++$+++ Firstly, please sign your comments with four tildes, <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>, to make it easier for editors to respond to comments on their Talk pages.  Secondly, the biography was non-notable according to the criteria set out in [[WP:BIO]], which is the reason why it was deleted.  +++$+++ :Firstly, please sign your comments with four tildes, <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, to make it easier for editors to respond to comments on their Talk pages.  Secondly, the biography was non-notable according to the criteria set out in [[WP:BIO]], which is the reason why it was deleted. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

268143 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268143 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-07 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.207616880E09 +++$+++ color=\"#FFCC00\">'''thoreau'''<\/font>]] ( +++$+++ color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 18:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268144 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268143 +++$+++ 268143 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.207617660E09 +++$+++ I was working on the category Autobiographies and came across it sorting them. Unfortunaely, the article is categorized in such a way then it ends up there. As I sort I put tags on article as needed. Really I would rather not get involved with you, but I also cannot let an egregious violatiom of Wikepedia standards go unchecked. &ndash; +++$+++ :I was working on the category Autobiographies and came across it sorting them. Unfortunaely, the article is categorized in such a way then it ends up there. As I sort I put tags on article as needed. Really I would rather not get involved with you, but I also cannot let an egregious violatiom of Wikepedia standards go unchecked. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268145 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268143 +++$+++ 268144 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.207618200E09 +++$+++ I highly doubt this claim, as you and I personally have quarreled over the films article for the book. Just admit it, you enjoy causing me frustration, and this is not what Wikipedia is about. The article has not been tagged for weeks\/months in that state, and all of the sudden, the same person who has been edit warring with me for weeks, and been warned not to tag to harass, shows up with a barrage of tags and acts in an aggressive tone per usual.  +++$+++ ::I highly doubt this claim, as you and I personally have quarreled over the films article for the book. Just admit it, you enjoy causing me frustration, and this is not what Wikipedia is about. The article has not been tagged for weeks/months in that state, and all of the sudden, the same person who has been edit warring with me for weeks, and been warned not to tag to harass, shows up with a barrage of tags and acts in an aggressive tone per usual. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 18:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268146 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268143 +++$+++ 268145 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.207617420E09 +++$+++ Please stop harassing me and the articles I work on with a barrage of tags in order to create frustration. Tags or criticisms from you are not in good faith, as our long and quarreling history shows. If this continues I will be forced to report you.  +++$+++ :::Please stop harassing me and the articles I work on with a barrage of tags in order to create frustration. Tags or criticisms from you are not in good faith, as our long and quarreling history shows. If this continues I will be forced to report you. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 18:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268147 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268143 +++$+++ 268146 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.207617780E09 +++$+++ Lets get some outside opinions on this article.  &ndash; +++$+++ ::::Lets get some outside opinions on this article.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268148 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268143 +++$+++ 268147 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.207618740E09 +++$+++ This is not about you finding one of your editor friends to agree with you either. How about lets get some separation, as we had the past few days which worked great for both of us. The probability of you stumbling upon the 2-3 articles I am working on, a few days after we have been warring for months is suspect. Please go your own way, to prevent us from having future edit wars, like in the past.  +++$+++ :::::This is not about you finding one of your editor friends to agree with you either. How about lets get some separation, as we had the past few days which worked great for both of us. The probability of you stumbling upon the 2-3 articles I am working on, a few days after we have been warring for months is suspect. Please go your own way, to prevent us from having future edit wars, like in the past. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 18:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

6000 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-06 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.294351080E09 +++$+++ |For taking the initiative and cleaning up the mess that was [[Chaos War (comics)]]!-- +++$+++ |For taking the initiative and cleaning up the mess that was [[Chaos War (comics)]]!--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 13:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
6001 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6000 +++$+++ 6000 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.294719660E09 +++$+++ What do you say we start on [[Siege (comics)]] next? I can probably help out more with that article since I'm more familiar with it.-- +++$+++ :What do you say we start on [[Siege (comics)]] next? I can probably help out more with that article since I'm more familiar with it.--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 20:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
6002 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6000 +++$+++ 6001 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.294720920E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the compliments. I copied the article to my [[User:TriiipleThreat\/Sandbox|sandbox]]. We can work on the article there.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the compliments. I copied the article to my [[User:TriiipleThreat/Sandbox|sandbox]]. We can work on the article there.--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 20:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
6003 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6000 +++$+++ 6002 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.295043360E09 +++$+++ Heh, I was expecting we'd work on this slowly but surely in the sandbox but you already got it done. The article looks great, it could be condensed further if it has to be but 900 words under the circumstances is acceptable.  As far as the footnoting is concerned, I approached it like a literary work distinguishing primary sources from third party sources, which we value higher. It was just an experiment and if you don't like you can just reincorporate the two.-- +++$+++ :::Heh, I was expecting we'd work on this slowly but surely in the sandbox but you already got it done. The article looks great, it could be condensed further if it has to be but 900 words under the circumstances is acceptable.  As far as the footnoting is concerned, I approached it like a literary work distinguishing primary sources from third party sources, which we value higher. It was just an experiment and if you don't like you can just reincorporate the two.--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 14:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

6004 +++$+++ Webwizard +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-12 11:23:00 +++$+++ 1.294860180E09 +++$+++ Hi, Tenebrae. I was going to ask for the page [[Glenn Cooper]] to be undeleted, but I don't understand where I should put the request. It seems that I should go [[WP:DELREV|here]], but there is no match for the search term in the logs. I may try [[WP:REFUND|here]], but at this point I think it's better ask, before I screw up something. Thanks -- +++$+++ Hi, Tenebrae. I was going to ask for the page [[Glenn Cooper]] to be undeleted, but I don't understand where I should put the request. It seems that I should go [[WP:DELREV|here]], but there is no match for the search term in the logs. I may try [[WP:REFUND|here]], but at this point I think it's better ask, before I screw up something. Thanks --[[User:Webwizard|Webwizard]] ([[User talk:Webwizard|talk]]) 11:23, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
6005 +++$+++ Webwizard +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6004 +++$+++ 6004 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.294936740E09 +++$+++ What I got is [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Glenn_Cooper|this]]. It looks to me like a deletion discussion. What do you think ? -- +++$+++ :What I got is [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Glenn_Cooper|this]]. It looks to me like a deletion discussion. What do you think ? --[[User:Webwizard|Webwizard]] ([[User talk:Webwizard|talk]]) 08:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
6006 +++$+++ Webwizard +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6004 +++$+++ 6005 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 10:28:00 +++$+++ 1.295461680E09 +++$+++ It helps indeed. Thanks a lot. -- +++$+++ ::It helps indeed. Thanks a lot. --[[User:Webwizard|Webwizard]] ([[User talk:Webwizard|talk]]) 10:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

268149 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-07 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.207618500E09 +++$+++ (outdent}Reply to \"I highly doubt this claim\" If you look at my edit history for the last several hours you will see that was what I was indeed doing. Otherwsie, I would not have come across the article. Please assume good faith.   &ndash; +++$+++ (outdent}Reply to "I highly doubt this claim" If you look at my edit history for the last several hours you will see that was what I was indeed doing. Otherwsie, I would not have come across the article. Please assume good faith.   &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268150 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268149 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.207618920E09 +++$+++ How can I ? You have made false accusations about me, which still go unanswered, and we have been at \"edit war\" for weeks ... I have extended an olive branch several times and been rebuked. It is not enough to hide behind the veil of \"good faith\" now, as you attempt to reignite and instigate our dorment conflict.   +++$+++ ::How can I ? You have made false accusations about me, which still go unanswered, and we have been at "edit war" for weeks ... I have extended an olive branch several times and been rebuked. It is not enough to hide behind the veil of "good faith" now, as you attempt to reignite and instigate our dorment conflict.  [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 18:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268151 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268149 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.207619400E09 +++$+++ The same way I have to assume good faith with you. I feel that I have been treated very badly by you and have been driven away from editing the [[Che Guevara]] article. and it  is very hard to do now,  when you have already started the personal attacks in you edit summary. If you do not cooperate in fixing the article I will seek outside help with this issue, as the violation, IMO,  is egregious. Please assume good faith, regardless of our editing history. Also please do not used edit summaries to make personal attack  &ndash; +++$+++ :::The same way I have to assume good faith with you. I feel that I have been treated very badly by you and have been driven away from editing the [[Che Guevara]] article. and it  is very hard to do now,  when you have already started the personal attacks in you edit summary. If you do not cooperate in fixing the article I will seek outside help with this issue, as the violation, IMO,  is egregious. Please assume good faith, regardless of our editing history. Also please do not used edit summaries to make personal attack  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

6007 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6007 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-13 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.294967160E09 +++$+++ I know you undone me but I am sorry it doesn't sound right (in my opinion) leaving that word out.  +++$+++ I know you undone me but I am sorry it doesn't sound right (in my opinion) leaving that word out. [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 17:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
6008 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6007 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.294967340E09 +++$+++ I believe I got you now. But it still sounds better to have film there in my opinion. It still have a uncomplete vibe going on with me.  +++$+++ ::I believe I got you now. But it still sounds better to have film there in my opinion. It still have a uncomplete vibe going on with me. [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 17:09, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

268152 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-07 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.207620240E09 +++$+++ Even veiling it as \"one editor\". The only thing egregious here is your behavior, and the amazing fact that after several days of peace, you are beginning to cause more conflict. You have treated me very badly for weeks ... I get along very well with all other editors I am working with right now ... the only problem comes with you, as you only act in bad faith, over, and over again. You never \"assume good faith\" with me ... and it showed by you declaring me creating a \"glorifying\" article. While I did show good faith, by addressing your \"would\" suggestion. Your mis-recollection of events even within the last hour is truly astonishing.  +++$+++ Even veiling it as "one editor". The only thing egregious here is your behavior, and the amazing fact that after several days of peace, you are beginning to cause more conflict. You have treated me very badly for weeks ... I get along very well with all other editors I am working with right now ... the only problem comes with you, as you only act in bad faith, over, and over again. You never "assume good faith" with me ... and it showed by you declaring me creating a "glorifying" article. While I did show good faith, by addressing your "would" suggestion. Your mis-recollection of events even within the last hour is truly astonishing. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 19:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268153 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268152 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.207620720E09 +++$+++ You see, instead of acting properly and messaging me expressing your view that the article was too \"praise worthy\", '''you automatically assume [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=The_Motorcycle_Diaries&action=history BAD FAITH]''' and assume that I am purposely trying to GLORIFY Guevara, instead of assuming I may have a different view than you. instead of wanting to discuss on the talk page ... (especially considering our history) you resort to a barrage of tags meant to annoy.  +++$+++ ::You see, instead of acting properly and messaging me expressing your view that the article was too "praise worthy", '''you automatically assume [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Motorcycle_Diaries&action=history BAD FAITH]''' and assume that I am purposely trying to GLORIFY Guevara, instead of assuming I may have a different view than you. instead of wanting to discuss on the talk page ... (especially considering our history) you resort to a barrage of tags meant to annoy. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 19:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268154 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268152 +++$+++ 268152 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.207621620E09 +++$+++ There is peace if I do not edit the articles you consider yours. I was editing on Che Guevara long before you arrived on the scene in November of 2007. You do not [[WP:OWN]] articles on Che Guevara. I would edit this article before you came, why can I not now?  &ndash; +++$+++ :There is peace if I do not edit the articles you consider yours. I was editing on Che Guevara long before you arrived on the scene in November of 2007. You do not [[WP:OWN]] articles on Che Guevara. I would edit this article before you came, why can I not now?  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268155 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268152 +++$+++ 268154 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.207621920E09 +++$+++ You had never edited this article before ... and had been editing articles on Hawaii for the past several days. Then all of the sudden as we had peace, you discover an article I have been working on, and instead of talking on the talk page, you start with a barrage of tags and attack me in the edit summary. Look at how harmoniously me and Coppertwig have worked on the CG article now that you have left. My problem is not with any editors ... it is with your behavior and bad faith actions.  +++$+++ ::You had never edited this article before ... and had been editing articles on Hawaii for the past several days. Then all of the sudden as we had peace, you discover an article I have been working on, and instead of talking on the talk page, you start with a barrage of tags and attack me in the edit summary. Look at how harmoniously me and Coppertwig have worked on the CG article now that you have left. My problem is not with any editors ... it is with your behavior and bad faith actions. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 19:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

530297 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-09 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.239338460E09 +++$+++ Hi, I am reviewing your article [[Tim Richmond]] for GA. It is a fine article. I have only a few comments which I entered at [[Talk:Tim Richmond\/GA1]]. Please feel free to contact me with any comments or concerns. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ Hi, I am reviewing your article [[Tim Richmond]] for GA. It is a fine article. I have only a few comments which I entered at [[Talk:Tim Richmond/GA1]]. Please feel free to contact me with any comments or concerns. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
530298 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530297 +++$+++ 530297 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.239361080E09 +++$+++ Hope all is going well on your end ;) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ *Hope all is going well on your end ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 03:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
530299 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530297 +++$+++ 530298 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.239364800E09 +++$+++ Yes, congrats are in order! I did become a Commons admin a few days ago. I didn't talk about it here because I didn't want the vote to be canvassed - I wanted the Commons regulars to give their opinion. We did end up edit conflicting on [[Tim Richmond]]'s GA cleanup; your edits worked for me. Would you add those references to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport\/Library]] under [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport\/Library\/General\/NASCAR]]? Which NASCAR articles were you considering to work on towards GA - or is that on hold? For the ASA race, I'd shot the big guys like recent champs. A young driver that impressed me last year was Brett Moffitt. Other ASA Midwest drivers used to race in NASCAR like [[Nathan Haseleu]], [[Todd Kluever]], and [[Chris Wimmer]]. It would be nice to have 2008 pictures for their articles. [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/search\/?w=56091178%40N00&q=ASA+Milwaukee&m=text Here's some drivers that I photographed last year]. Thanks! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :*Yes, congrats are in order! I did become a Commons admin a few days ago. I didn't talk about it here because I didn't want the vote to be canvassed - I wanted the Commons regulars to give their opinion. We did end up edit conflicting on [[Tim Richmond]]'s GA cleanup; your edits worked for me. Would you add those references to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport/Library]] under [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport/Library/General/NASCAR]]? Which NASCAR articles were you considering to work on towards GA - or is that on hold? For the ASA race, I'd shot the big guys like recent champs. A young driver that impressed me last year was Brett Moffitt. Other ASA Midwest drivers used to race in NASCAR like [[Nathan Haseleu]], [[Todd Kluever]], and [[Chris Wimmer]]. It would be nice to have 2008 pictures for their articles. [http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=56091178%40N00&q=ASA+Milwaukee&m=text Here's some drivers that I photographed last year]. Thanks! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:00, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
530300 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530297 +++$+++ 530298 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.239390540E09 +++$+++ I'll make sure I take a list with me to Toledo (if weather is decent), and do my best for pics too.  Have a good one ;) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ::I'll make sure I take a list with me to Toledo (if weather is decent), and do my best for pics too.  Have a good one ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 12:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
530301 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530297 +++$+++ 530300 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.239430680E09 +++$+++ My reply above is worded poorly. I mean that you '''should''' take pictures of those drivers at the ASA race. I don't expect you to work on any particular NASCAR article, just was wondering what direction you wanted to head. I remember that we talked about it, but I can't find your listing of what you wanted to work on next. As for [[National Championship Stock Car Circuit]] (NCSCC), I think it should have it's own article since it was distinct from NASCAR. Even though Bill France as involved, it was a separate venture. I'll put it high on my To Do list. An interesting article for DYK. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::My reply above is worded poorly. I mean that you '''should''' take pictures of those drivers at the ASA race. I don't expect you to work on any particular NASCAR article, just was wondering what direction you wanted to head. I remember that we talked about it, but I can't find your listing of what you wanted to work on next. As for [[National Championship Stock Car Circuit]] (NCSCC), I think it should have it's own article since it was distinct from NASCAR. Even though Bill France as involved, it was a separate venture. I'll put it high on my To Do list. An interesting article for DYK. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
530302 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530297 +++$+++ 530301 +++$+++ 2009-04-11 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.239440520E09 +++$+++ Also, I wanted to mention - Anytime you think I'm headed in a wrong direction, please let me know - I give you free reign to monitor me in all my actions and posts.  Not that I expect you to babysit - but if you see something that makes you wince, let me know. Cheers buddy, ;) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ::::Also, I wanted to mention - Anytime you think I'm headed in a wrong direction, please let me know - I give you free reign to monitor me in all my actions and posts.  Not that I expect you to babysit - but if you see something that makes you wince, let me know. Cheers buddy, ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 02:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
530303 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530297 +++$+++ 530302 +++$+++ 2009-04-11 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.239451020E09 +++$+++ No problem, let me know if you have questions on anything. It's not pestering. I don't watch your editing (like you said), but I'd let you know if I do see something odd. I hate how the Earnhardt article has the legacy\/songs section - it's one big trivia section that should be deleted. Maybe someone would consider it to be notable enough for it's own article ... I'm not convinced.... but I'll keep an open mind. I'm not surprised that Richmond took a month to be reviewed. The WikiProject Wrestling articles usually wait over one month. NASCAR isn't very popular with reviewers either. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::No problem, let me know if you have questions on anything. It's not pestering. I don't watch your editing (like you said), but I'd let you know if I do see something odd. I hate how the Earnhardt article has the legacy/songs section - it's one big trivia section that should be deleted. Maybe someone would consider it to be notable enough for it's own article ... I'm not convinced.... but I'll keep an open mind. I'm not surprised that Richmond took a month to be reviewed. The WikiProject Wrestling articles usually wait over one month. NASCAR isn't very popular with reviewers either. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

6010 +++$+++ REVUpminster +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6010 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-18 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.295419920E09 +++$+++ I know you don't like this but how can I cite DVD.s on a series that was effectively buried by Sony when all that is left is some archived official website info. Some transferred to a shadow website, and Anthony de Longis who was the first swordmaster and wrote very detailed episode info on the six he did. Even on his site the links are not now visible but are still there http:\/\/www.delongis.com\/LaReina\/index.html. The court cases and stunt performers was mostly developed by Taram and I did simplyfy some of it. I need help as this is a very difficult article to develop. Just seen your message. +++$+++ I know you don't like this but how can I cite DVD.s on a series that was effectively buried by Sony when all that is left is some archived official website info. Some transferred to a shadow website, and Anthony de Longis who was the first swordmaster and wrote very detailed episode info on the six he did. Even on his site the links are not now visible but are still there http://www.delongis.com/LaReina/index.html. The court cases and stunt performers was mostly developed by Taram and I did simplyfy some of it. I need help as this is a very difficult article to develop. Just seen your message.[[User:REVUpminster|REVUpminster]] ([[User talk:REVUpminster|talk]]) 22:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
6011 +++$+++ REVUpminster +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6010 +++$+++ 6010 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.295422560E09 +++$+++ With the DeLongis site. Never hit any link other than refering to the next page or back to the link above. There are about 24 pages in all. This link http:\/\/www.delongis.com\/LaReina\/Destiny.html is to page 1 of Destiny. you can go on to page 2\/3 etc or back to the QoS index not the de longis index. As for dvd the Japaneses and french they are official, everything else is bootleg. To Americans the series doesn't exist. A British company holds the rights and dvd rights worldwide except America. +++$+++ *With the DeLongis site. Never hit any link other than refering to the next page or back to the link above. There are about 24 pages in all. This link http://www.delongis.com/LaReina/Destiny.html is to page 1 of Destiny. you can go on to page 2/3 etc or back to the QoS index not the de longis index. As for dvd the Japaneses and french they are official, everything else is bootleg. To Americans the series doesn't exist. A British company holds the rights and dvd rights worldwide except America.[[User:REVUpminster|REVUpminster]] ([[User talk:REVUpminster|talk]]) 23:36, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
6012 +++$+++ REVUpminster +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6010 +++$+++ 6010 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.295423160E09 +++$+++ Thankyou. It's nearly midnight. I will be off line for now. +++$+++ *Thankyou. It's nearly midnight. I will be off line for now.[[User:REVUpminster|REVUpminster]] ([[User talk:REVUpminster|talk]]) 23:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
6013 +++$+++ REVUpminster +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6010 +++$+++ 6010 +++$+++ 2011-02-15 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.297829040E09 +++$+++ I am pleased you have had another go. I thought you might when I added back Linda Luken because I had found a second source, Incidently she is not credited on broadcasts here in England or on the two official DVD's (French and Japanese) and I do not think in Canada either, only in the US. The Queens doubles was written mainly by [[User talk:Taram]] who seems to have links to [[Roberta Brown]] and other production staff. I did rewrite some of it when he made it seem Tessie Santiago did not appear in the first six episodes. As for the accolades cite, I looked at [[Gina Torres]] the winner and it is mentioned but no cite I could copy. Thanks.  +++$+++ *I am pleased you have had another go. I thought you might when I added back Linda Luken because I had found a second source, Incidently she is not credited on broadcasts here in England or on the two official DVD's (French and Japanese) and I do not think in Canada either, only in the US. The Queens doubles was written mainly by [[User talk:Taram]] who seems to have links to [[Roberta Brown]] and other production staff. I did rewrite some of it when he made it seem Tessie Santiago did not appear in the first six episodes. As for the accolades cite, I looked at [[Gina Torres]] the winner and it is mentioned but no cite I could copy. Thanks. [[User:REVUpminster|REVUpminster]] ([[User talk:REVUpminster|talk]]) 20:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

268156 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268156 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-07 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.207622580E09 +++$+++ You apparently have been following me around. I did not know you were currently editing the Motorcycle Diaries, as frankly, I have not been paying attention to what you do. Anyway, regardless of where I have been editing, I still am permitted to edit Che Guevara article. Where do you get the idea that I am not? &ndash; +++$+++ You apparently have been following me around. I did not know you were currently editing the Motorcycle Diaries, as frankly, I have not been paying attention to what you do. Anyway, regardless of where I have been editing, I still am permitted to edit Che Guevara article. Where do you get the idea that I am not? &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268157 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268156 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.207622100E09 +++$+++ Lets work on the article following the proper guidelines in [[Wikipedia:Notability (books)]]. How the editors feel about the subject of an article should not be apparent to the reader. Lets make this article that way. Also, long plot descriptions are heavily discouraged by wikipedia.  &ndash; +++$+++ ::Lets work on the article following the proper guidelines in [[Wikipedia:Notability (books)]]. How the editors feel about the subject of an article should not be apparent to the reader. Lets make this article that way. Also, long plot descriptions are heavily discouraged by wikipedia.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268158 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268156 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.207628340E09 +++$+++ I haven't followed you around at all, realizing that per your usual behavior that you would seek out admins to misrepresent your case to (which you did again), I clicked on Contribs and saw that you have been making dozens of Hawaii themed edits. I never said you WERE NOT allowed to edit the article ... I claimed that you were acting in bad faith and to annoy.  +++$+++ :::I haven't followed you around at all, realizing that per your usual behavior that you would seek out admins to misrepresent your case to (which you did again), I clicked on Contribs and saw that you have been making dozens of Hawaii themed edits. I never said you WERE NOT allowed to edit the article ... I claimed that you were acting in bad faith and to annoy. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 21:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268159 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268156 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.207628700E09 +++$+++ It is considered a personal attack to accuse someone of bad faith. Please assume good faith. Your assumptions are only worsening the situation. Please assume good faith.   &ndash; +++$+++ ::::It is considered a personal attack to accuse someone of bad faith. Please assume good faith. Your assumptions are only worsening the situation. Please assume good faith.   &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268160 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268156 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.207628520E09 +++$+++ '''PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:''' [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#another_use_of_POV_tags_and_other]] = There you have it. I expect you to cease your abusive use of article tags without justification, so that reporting you will not be necessary.  +++$+++ ::::'''PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:''' [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#another_use_of_POV_tags_and_other]] = There you have it. I expect you to cease your abusive use of article tags without justification, so that reporting you will not be necessary. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 21:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268161 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268156 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.207628700E09 +++$+++ It is considered a personal attack to accuse someone of bad faith. Please assume good faith. Your assumptions are only worsening the situation. Please assume good faith.   &ndash; +++$+++ ::::It is considered a personal attack to accuse someone of bad faith. Please assume good faith. Your assumptions are only worsening the situation. Please assume good faith.   &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268162 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268156 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.207628880E09 +++$+++ It is not a personal attack to describe bad faith as so. The only time you show good faith, is when you repeat the word over and over lately '''(to cover yourself)'''. However your actions have been deplorable for weeks in relation to me, so forgive my skepticism. I see better than I hear.  +++$+++ :::::It is not a personal attack to describe bad faith as so. The only time you show good faith, is when you repeat the word over and over lately '''(to cover yourself)'''. However your actions have been deplorable for weeks in relation to me, so forgive my skepticism. I see better than I hear. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 21:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

6015 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-21 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.295654040E09 +++$+++ Hey as Erik mention I thought you might be interested in helping us form this new task force. Your expertise in comic book related articles would make you a valued member. If interested please sign up [[User:Erik\/Films based on comics task force|here]].-- +++$+++ Hey as Erik mention I thought you might be interested in helping us form this new task force. Your expertise in comic book related articles would make you a valued member. If interested please sign up [[User:Erik/Films based on comics task force|here]].--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 15:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
6016 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6015 +++$+++ 6015 +++$+++ 2011-01-22 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.295683260E09 +++$+++ Welcome aboard! We'll probably kick off the task force soon. Check out the talk page for a few early discussions.  +++$+++ :Welcome aboard! We'll probably kick off the task force soon. Check out the talk page for a few early discussions. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 00:01, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

530304 +++$+++ Michael93555 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-10 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.239415980E09 +++$+++ Your welcome. Keep up the good work!.. Do you like my new signature. --<font face=\"papyrus\"> +++$+++ Your welcome. Keep up the good work!.. Do you like my new signature. --<font face="papyrus">[[User:Michael93555|'''<font color="#0000ff">Michael</font>''']]'''  [[User Talk:Michael93555|(Talk)]]'''</font> 19:13, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
530305 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530304 +++$+++ 530304 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.239428520E09 +++$+++ Yea, I do like your new signature. It is much more interesting the bland default, yet it doesn't take up a bunch of characters! My colors are from my college alma mater. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Yea, I do like your new signature. It is much more interesting the bland default, yet it doesn't take up a bunch of characters! My colors are from my college alma mater. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 22:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

6017 +++$+++ jtmatbat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-20 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.295559540E09 +++$+++ I'm confused now - how can I prove my point that \"The Darknight Detective\" was indeed a sobriquet used by DC without using a footnote reference? Your guidance is appreciated.  +++$+++ I'm confused now - how can I prove my point that "The Darknight Detective" was indeed a sobriquet used by DC without using a footnote reference? Your guidance is appreciated. [[User:jtmatbat|jtmatbat]] ([[User talk:jtmatbat|jtmatbat]] 13:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
6018 +++$+++ jtmatbat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6017 +++$+++ 6017 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.295569020E09 +++$+++ I have many old comic books from the Seventies and Eighties where Batman is referred to as the Darknight Detective that I could reference, but unfortunately that's not what you're looking for. I'll see if I can find a book that meets your criteria. Thanks! +++$+++ :I have many old comic books from the Seventies and Eighties where Batman is referred to as the Darknight Detective that I could reference, but unfortunately that's not what you're looking for. I'll see if I can find a book that meets your criteria. Thanks![[User:jtmatbat|jtmatbat]] ([[User talk:jtmatbat|jtmatbat]] 16:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

508733 +++$+++ Pavel Vozenilek +++$+++ Ngb +++$+++ 508733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-21 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.124668080E09 +++$+++ Could ypu please take look on this article? It was created by an user whose other edits were childish vandalism so this one strangely stands out. I looked for copyvio but didn't find anything. Thanks.  +++$+++ Could ypu please take look on this article? It was created by an user whose other edits were childish vandalism so this one strangely stands out. I looked for copyvio but didn't find anything. Thanks. [[User:Pavel Vozenilek|Pavel Vozenilek]] 16:48, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
508734 +++$+++ Ngb +++$+++ Ngb +++$+++ 508733 +++$+++ 508733 +++$+++ 2005-08-21 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.124670720E09 +++$+++ Replied on [[User_talk:Pavel Vozenilek|Pavel Vozenilek's talk page]]. -- +++$+++ :Replied on [[User_talk:Pavel Vozenilek|Pavel Vozenilek's talk page]]. --[[User:Ngb|Ngb]] 17:32, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

268163 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-07 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.207630020E09 +++$+++ Those were good suggestions they gave at the village pump about [[The Motorcycle Diaries]]. Lets follow them. &ndash; +++$+++ Those were good suggestions they gave at the village pump about [[The Motorcycle Diaries]]. Lets follow them. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268164 +++$+++ Enric Naval +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268163 +++$+++ 268163 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.207632600E09 +++$+++ another good suggestion: please stop making comments about the other editor's motivations to make an edit. Just argue your point basing yourself on hard facts and don't get involved on personal discussions, please -- +++$+++ :another good suggestion: please stop making comments about the other editor's motivations to make an edit. Just argue your point basing yourself on hard facts and don't get involved on personal discussions, please --[[User:Enric Naval|Enric Naval]] ([[User talk:Enric Naval|talk]]) 22:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268165 +++$+++ Enric Naval +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268163 +++$+++ 268164 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.207634580E09 +++$+++ So stop doubting the notability and stop citing this guideline for backing your doubts, or I will assume that you are trying to make a [[WP:POINT]] for some reason, and I'll just go ahead and report you to WP:ETIQUETTE or the adequate place for this sort of reporting, understood?. -- +++$+++ ::So stop doubting the notability and stop citing this guideline for backing your doubts, or I will assume that you are trying to make a [[WP:POINT]] for some reason, and I'll just go ahead and report you to WP:ETIQUETTE or the adequate place for this sort of reporting, understood?. --[[User:Enric Naval|Enric Naval]] ([[User talk:Enric Naval|talk]]) 23:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268166 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268163 +++$+++ 268163 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.207716540E09 +++$+++ Redthoreau, please stop harassing my on my talk page. I am asking you for the third times. &ndash; +++$+++ *Redthoreau, please stop harassing my on my talk page. I am asking you for the third times. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

6021 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-23 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.295850300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 22:25, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
6022 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6021 +++$+++ 6021 +++$+++ 2011-01-23 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.295850420E09 +++$+++ \"comicbookmovie.com\" doesn't appear on the RS noticeboard. Next time, if there's a debate about a source, it's great to get it referenced somewhere in the noticeboard so people can search for any debated site and see if there is a previous discussion.  +++$+++ * "comicbookmovie.com" doesn't appear on the RS noticeboard. Next time, if there's a debate about a source, it's great to get it referenced somewhere in the noticeboard so people can search for any debated site and see if there is a previous discussion. [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 22:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
6023 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6021 +++$+++ 6022 +++$+++ 2011-01-23 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.295850900E09 +++$+++ I can't find \"comicbookmovie.com\" at [[Talk:The Avengers film project]] - Where are the discussions about it?  +++$+++ ** I can't find "comicbookmovie.com" at [[Talk:The Avengers film project]] - Where are the discussions about it? [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 22:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

530310 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-16 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.239877080E09 +++$+++ Hrmm, a bugzilla person commented (in response to the cascading protection bug) ''Most likely because they are on commons'' which is completely false. I don't have a bugzilla account, so could you give the links to images vandalized? ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File:Sloat_House,_Sloatsburg,_NY.jpg&diff=278896043&oldid=278895819 This diff] for a temporary uploaded pic and [[:File:Lyon0002soft.JPG|this pic]], which was always on En)  +++$+++ Hrmm, a bugzilla person commented (in response to the cascading protection bug) ''Most likely because they are on commons'' which is completely false. I don't have a bugzilla account, so could you give the links to images vandalized? ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sloat_House,_Sloatsburg,_NY.jpg&diff=278896043&oldid=278895819 This diff] for a temporary uploaded pic and [[:File:Lyon0002soft.JPG|this pic]], which was always on En) [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 03:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
530311 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530310 +++$+++ 530310 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.239889260E09 +++$+++ And here's another concrete example, the one I tested out: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know&diff=278895092&oldid=278865160 On the Main Page] at 06:25, 22 March 2009, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File:Sloat_House,_Sloatsburg,_NY.jpg&diff=278896043&oldid=278895819 edited] minutes later by me, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know&diff=278927736&oldid=278911091 taken off] the Main Page at 12:24, 22 March 2009. This one was originally at Commons, but was temporarily uploaded to En, and was on En for the duration (from 06:25 to 12:24). (Feel free to copy this post to Bugzilla)  +++$+++ :And here's another concrete example, the one I tested out: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know&diff=278895092&oldid=278865160 On the Main Page] at 06:25, 22 March 2009, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sloat_House,_Sloatsburg,_NY.jpg&diff=278896043&oldid=278895819 edited] minutes later by me, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know&diff=278927736&oldid=278911091 taken off] the Main Page at 12:24, 22 March 2009. This one was originally at Commons, but was temporarily uploaded to En, and was on En for the duration (from 06:25 to 12:24). (Feel free to copy this post to Bugzilla) [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 06:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
530312 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530310 +++$+++ 530311 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.239919740E09 +++$+++ *facepalm* Ack, it is ''not'' a local problem. Them suggesting clearing the browser cache shows they think it's local. They can call it Martian for all I care, but English Wikipedia Main Page images ''have been edited while on the Main Page''. I'll try and get a Buzilla account tonight or tomorrow...this is ridiculous. Really busy today, otherwise I would sooner (actually, probably shouldn't be online now).  +++$+++ :: *facepalm* Ack, it is ''not'' a local problem. Them suggesting clearing the browser cache shows they think it's local. They can call it Martian for all I care, but English Wikipedia Main Page images ''have been edited while on the Main Page''. I'll try and get a Buzilla account tonight or tomorrow...this is ridiculous. Really busy today, otherwise I would sooner (actually, probably shouldn't be online now). [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 15:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

612673 +++$+++ Sdsds +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-24 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.177470000E09 +++$+++ I bring to your attention [[User talk:65.211.16.65]], where you used Template:uw-vandalism4 to threaten a block. Please see the discussion there and take action as appropriate.  +++$+++ I bring to your attention [[User talk:65.211.16.65]], where you used Template:uw-vandalism4 to threaten a block. Please see the discussion there and take action as appropriate. [[User:Sdsds|Sdsds]] 20:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
612674 +++$+++ Jim62sch +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612673 +++$+++ 612673 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.177471020E09 +++$+++ I'd suggest a longer block.   +++$+++ :I'd suggest a longer block.  [[User:Jim62sch|<font face="Times New Roman" color="FF2400">&#0149;Jim</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="F4C430">62</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="000000">sch&#0149;</font>]] 20:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
612675 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612673 +++$+++ 612674 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.177471500E09 +++$+++ Well, it's one step longer than the last block anon got, and this leniency has been noted in a tactful message to said anon suggesting taking up the offer by [[User:Sdsds|Sdsds]]. Ah hae ma doots, but maybe such kindness will pay off this time. ..  +++$+++ ::Well, it's one step longer than the last block anon got, and this leniency has been noted in a tactful message to said anon suggesting taking up the offer by [[User:Sdsds|Sdsds]]. Ah hae ma doots, but maybe such kindness will pay off this time. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

530313 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530313 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-18 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.240107180E09 +++$+++ In case you need more evidence, on the latest update, [[:File:Tomb of Sofia Afentaki.JPG]] was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know\/Queue\/6&diff=prev&oldid=284662356 on the Main Page] at 19:04, and I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File:Tomb_of_Sofia_Afentaki.JPG&diff=284663395&oldid=284659981 edited] it at 19:11.  +++$+++ In case you need more evidence, on the latest update, [[:File:Tomb of Sofia Afentaki.JPG]] was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know/Queue/6&diff=prev&oldid=284662356 on the Main Page] at 19:04, and I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Tomb_of_Sofia_Afentaki.JPG&diff=284663395&oldid=284659981 edited] it at 19:11. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 19:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
530314 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530313 +++$+++ 530313 +++$+++ 2009-04-19 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.240144560E09 +++$+++ Also, if we're not doing any more test edits, it would be nice to get Commons protection back :)  +++$+++ :Also, if we're not doing any more test edits, it would be nice to get Commons protection back :) [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 05:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
530315 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530313 +++$+++ 530314 +++$+++ 2009-04-19 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.240146000E09 +++$+++ By the way, BorgQueen has [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:BorgQueen&diff=prev&oldid=284757055 said] that ITN images are almost always manually protected. Would be nice to have an overarching solution to the problem though.  +++$+++ ::By the way, BorgQueen has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BorgQueen&diff=prev&oldid=284757055 said] that ITN images are almost always manually protected. Would be nice to have an overarching solution to the problem though. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 06:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

268170 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-07 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.207632180E09 +++$+++ Also maybe you should read [[Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point]] and [[Wikipedia:Gaming the system]]  +++$+++ Also maybe you should read [[Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point]] and [[Wikipedia:Gaming the system]] [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 22:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268171 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268170 +++$+++ 268170 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.207635240E09 +++$+++ O.K. Thanks!  &ndash; +++$+++ :O.K. Thanks!  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
268172 +++$+++ Coppertwig +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268170 +++$+++ 268171 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.207640640E09 +++$+++ Ah, I hope that very positive word is a sign that the above dispute is ending.  Mattisse, I'm sorry that I didn't reply earlier to certain messages from Redthoreau to you on my talk page.  I wasn't sure how to respond, then got distracted.  I should probably have responded immediately.  In any case, I've just now posted a message on [[User talk:Coppertwig#Belated reply to Redthoreau|my talk page]] addressed to Redthoreau, partly in reply to those messages, which you might be interested in looking at.  Note that I've apologized to you for over-reacting previously and I hope I've avoided over-reacting this time; I'm sorry if it seems to you like an under-reaction. :-)  I hope my message doesn't make things worse. -- +++$+++ ::Ah, I hope that very positive word is a sign that the above dispute is ending.  Mattisse, I'm sorry that I didn't reply earlier to certain messages from Redthoreau to you on my talk page.  I wasn't sure how to respond, then got distracted.  I should probably have responded immediately.  In any case, I've just now posted a message on [[User talk:Coppertwig#Belated reply to Redthoreau|my talk page]] addressed to Redthoreau, partly in reply to those messages, which you might be interested in looking at.  Note that I've apologized to you for over-reacting previously and I hope I've avoided over-reacting this time; I'm sorry if it seems to you like an under-reaction. :-)  I hope my message doesn't make things worse. --[[User:Coppertwig|Coppertwig]] ([[User talk:Coppertwig|talk]]) 00:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268173 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268170 +++$+++ 268172 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.207641060E09 +++$+++ It will only end if I cease editing the articles in question. I stopped Che Guevars. Now it is a question if I will be driven from a second article. The only thing that has changed is that one editor, doncram, came to my defense. But it will not be worth it to him, I'm sure, to stand up to Redthoreau. No one has so far, so I don't expect any change. In fact I expect an ugly post from him to appear right under this one.  &ndash; +++$+++ :::It will only end if I cease editing the articles in question. I stopped Che Guevars. Now it is a question if I will be driven from a second article. The only thing that has changed is that one editor, doncram, came to my defense. But it will not be worth it to him, I'm sure, to stand up to Redthoreau. No one has so far, so I don't expect any change. In fact I expect an ugly post from him to appear right under this one.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268174 +++$+++ Coppertwig +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268170 +++$+++ 268173 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.207643880E09 +++$+++ Having to stop editing the articles would be unjust.  I hope there's another way it can end. -- +++$+++ ::::Having to stop editing the articles would be unjust.  I hope there's another way it can end. --[[User:Coppertwig|Coppertwig]] ([[User talk:Coppertwig|talk]]) 01:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268175 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268170 +++$+++ 268174 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.207644480E09 +++$+++ I don't think Wikipedia is about justice. I was hoping that it was about being a good encyclopedia but domination always win in the end. I was persoally attacked all afternoon with no response from the \"big guys\". (Not that it was expected as I know wikipedia.) In the few days I stopped editing Che Guevara I got a Barnstar, a DYK with at least one other on the way and an invitation to join a project because they like my work and think I would be a tremendous asset! Imagine that! &ndash; +++$+++ :::::I don't think Wikipedia is about justice. I was hoping that it was about being a good encyclopedia but domination always win in the end. I was persoally attacked all afternoon with no response from the "big guys". (Not that it was expected as I know wikipedia.) In the few days I stopped editing Che Guevara I got a Barnstar, a DYK with at least one other on the way and an invitation to join a project because they like my work and think I would be a tremendous asset! Imagine that! &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268176 +++$+++ Coppertwig +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268170 +++$+++ 268175 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.207644840E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia may or may not be about justice, but it's supposed to be about NPOV, and having people with different POV's editing the same article is the best way to achieve that.  We Wikipedians need to learn to get along with people who have different POV's, different personality types, different ideas about how to interact, etc. -- +++$+++ ::::::Wikipedia may or may not be about justice, but it's supposed to be about NPOV, and having people with different POV's editing the same article is the best way to achieve that.  We Wikipedians need to learn to get along with people who have different POV's, different personality types, different ideas about how to interact, etc. --[[User:Coppertwig|Coppertwig]] ([[User talk:Coppertwig|talk]]) 01:54, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268177 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268170 +++$+++ 268176 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.207708680E09 +++$+++ I have to ask. What are you congrattlating me for? Is it because I still am not able to edit one of Redthorou's articles?  Or is it because he did not swoop in and put an ugly comment under my posting as I predicted he would above? I don't understand your way of thinking. Sincerely, &ndash; +++$+++ :::::::I have to ask. What are you congrattlating me for? Is it because I still am not able to edit one of Redthorou's articles?  Or is it because he did not swoop in and put an ugly comment under my posting as I predicted he would above? I don't understand your way of thinking. Sincerely, &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268178 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268170 +++$+++ 268177 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.207709520E09 +++$+++ Or maybe he was being nice and congratulating you on the Barn Star you mentioned. [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|Assume Good Faith]] remember? ;o) &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;  +++$+++ :::::::: Or maybe he was being nice and congratulating you on the Barn Star you mentioned. [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|Assume Good Faith]] remember? ;o) &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 19:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

530316 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530316 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-12 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.239595080E09 +++$+++ Hey Royal, just wanted to stop by and say Happy Easter.  Hope it's a good one. ;) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ Hey Royal, just wanted to stop by and say Happy Easter.  Hope it's a good one. ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 20:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
530317 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530316 +++$+++ 530316 +++$+++ 2009-04-13 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.239620340E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I hope that you, and everyone else, had a Happy Easter! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thanks! I hope that you, and everyone else, had a Happy Easter! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

530321 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-18 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.240038900E09 +++$+++ If it's not already on your watchlist .. [[NASCAR]].  After a few days of being involved in various policy and guideline talk pages, I finally got back to actual article editing.  More to come, I'd really like to see the main NASCAR get up to FA, but I understand that GA comes first - and there's a ton of work that needs to be done to achieve that.  Hope life is treating you well ;) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ If it's not already on your watchlist .. [[NASCAR]].  After a few days of being involved in various policy and guideline talk pages, I finally got back to actual article editing.  More to come, I'd really like to see the main NASCAR get up to FA, but I understand that GA comes first - and there's a ton of work that needs to be done to achieve that.  Hope life is treating you well ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 00:15, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
530322 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530321 +++$+++ 530321 +++$+++ 2009-04-18 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.240052100E09 +++$+++ I always stick to biographies. Sounds like A LOT of work to get that article up to GA. It's a big topic! It had few inline citations. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I always stick to biographies. Sounds like A LOT of work to get that article up to GA. It's a big topic! It had few inline citations. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:55, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

6034 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-25 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.295947920E09 +++$+++ Sure wish you had not redacted your comments,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:The_Dark_Knight_Rises&diff=next&oldid=409842011] when a strike-through would have served... specially as your points toward naming are well made.  What I tried to clarify in my [[Talk:The Dark Knight Rises#Warning: Long-winded|long-winded section]] was simply that we need depend more on consideration of a topic's overall notability, and less on whether the topic is a proposed film or not.  While few make actually make it through the gauntlet of notability.... most will not. ''' +++$+++ Sure wish you had not redacted your comments,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Dark_Knight_Rises&diff=next&oldid=409842011] when a strike-through would have served... specially as your points toward naming are well made.  What I tried to clarify in my [[Talk:The Dark Knight Rises#Warning: Long-winded|long-winded section]] was simply that we need depend more on consideration of a topic's overall notability, and less on whether the topic is a proposed film or not.  While few make actually make it through the gauntlet of notability.... most will not. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 01:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
6035 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6034 +++$+++ 6034 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.295992920E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 14:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

268179 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-08 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.207710900E09 +++$+++ I knew you would turn up. I feel invaded. If Coppertwig had been being nice, than now you have certainly ruined it as  Coppertwig almost certainly  knew you would, as you are so predictable. You know, after a while it does cross over to harassing someone.  If I cannot comment anywhere&mdash;on my own talk page, Coppertwig's, other editors, any admin I go to, even at the village pump, anything that has remotely to do with you,  you are beginning to cross the line. I cannot get help with my problems as I have no privacy with you continual stalking. Give me some freedom from your constant harassment  on my own talk page at least. I have asked you before, but I asking you again  please do not   post on my talk page anymore.  Thanks, &ndash; +++$+++ I knew you would turn up. I feel invaded. If Coppertwig had been being nice, than now you have certainly ruined it as  Coppertwig almost certainly  knew you would, as you are so predictable. You know, after a while it does cross over to harassing someone.  If I cannot comment anywhere&mdash;on my own talk page, Coppertwig's, other editors, any admin I go to, even at the village pump, anything that has remotely to do with you,  you are beginning to cross the line. I cannot get help with my problems as I have no privacy with you continual stalking. Give me some freedom from your constant harassment  on my own talk page at least. I have asked you before, but I asking you again  please do not   post on my talk page anymore.  Thanks, &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268180 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268179 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.207713780E09 +++$+++ '''I reserve the right to \"appear\" anytime you mention my name. If you do not want me to \"appear\" = then desist from talking about me ... it's that simple.''' Every editor has the right to defend themselves against their accuser. If you stopped making false accusations about me, then I could stop posting my defense. As for ''\"ruining\"'' it ... your paranoia ruined it, as you took a nice compliment by a fellow editor ''(who has always been kind and fair to you)'' and once again accused him of making an insult. Because I know [[User:Coppertwig|Coppertwig]] is a good person, I am sure he will show up and needlessly ''\"apologize\"'' for your misunderstanding ... as he usually does when you ''\"get upset\"'' over something that only occurs in your own mind. &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;  +++$+++ ::'''I reserve the right to "appear" anytime you mention my name. If you do not want me to "appear" = then desist from talking about me ... it's that simple.''' Every editor has the right to defend themselves against their accuser. If you stopped making false accusations about me, then I could stop posting my defense. As for ''"ruining"'' it ... your paranoia ruined it, as you took a nice compliment by a fellow editor ''(who has always been kind and fair to you)'' and once again accused him of making an insult. Because I know [[User:Coppertwig|Coppertwig]] is a good person, I am sure he will show up and needlessly ''"apologize"'' for your misunderstanding ... as he usually does when you ''"get upset"'' over something that only occurs in your own mind. &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 21:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268181 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268179 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.207714380E09 +++$+++ Others mention your name, especially you friend Coppertwig. Therfore, I will tell him to not post your name on my page again.  PLease do not continue to post on my page. Your two last remarks were trivial and seem to be meant to harass me. That is certainly the way I experience them.  &ndash; +++$+++ :::Others mention your name, especially you friend Coppertwig. Therfore, I will tell him to not post your name on my page again.  PLease do not continue to post on my page. Your two last remarks were trivial and seem to be meant to harass me. That is certainly the way I experience them.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268182 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268179 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.207714920E09 +++$+++ = accept personal responsibility for your actions, and have a nice day. &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;  +++$+++ ::::= accept personal responsibility for your actions, and have a nice day. &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 21:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

530324 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-19 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.240167060E09 +++$+++ I came here from RFD's talk, where I saw that you're open to photo requests :-)  When you get the chance, could you take pictures for places [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Wisconsin|listed on the National Register of Historic Places]]?  Thanks!   +++$+++ I came here from RFD's talk, where I saw that you're open to photo requests :-)  When you get the chance, could you take pictures for places [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Wisconsin|listed on the National Register of Historic Places]]?  Thanks!  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 11:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
530325 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530324 +++$+++ 530324 +++$+++ 2009-04-19 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.240169880E09 +++$+++ Well, I've, ah, taken hundreds already! I've joined the WikiProject for that reason. Look at the page, I took almost all of those pictures. Last night I took pictures of all the historic places in [[Shawano, Wisconsin]]... '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Well, I've, ah, taken hundreds already! I've joined the WikiProject for that reason. Look at the page, I took almost all of those pictures. Last night I took pictures of all the historic places in [[Shawano, Wisconsin]]... '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
530326 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530324 +++$+++ 530325 +++$+++ 2009-04-19 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.240170420E09 +++$+++ Actually, looking at that particular article, it looks like I haven't been. That's because I took the pictures that ended up on subarticles of that article. I \"trackchase\" - travel to racetracks anywhere in the eastern half of WI to watch the races. I went to 30 tracks last year; the only track outside of Wisconsin was [[Rockford Speedway]] just south of the border. If I have some time when I travel to a racetrack, I check out that page for the cities on my way to the track and snap the pics. Sometimes I do a day trip where I drive to some area that I haven't been to before (or lately). I have uploaded almost 1400 photos to Commons, mainly Wisconsin cities and historic places. See [[Commons:Category:Files_by_User:Royalbroil_from_en.wikipedia]] '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Actually, looking at that particular article, it looks like I haven't been. That's because I took the pictures that ended up on subarticles of that article. I "trackchase" - travel to racetracks anywhere in the eastern half of WI to watch the races. I went to 30 tracks last year; the only track outside of Wisconsin was [[Rockford Speedway]] just south of the border. If I have some time when I travel to a racetrack, I check out that page for the cities on my way to the track and snap the pics. Sometimes I do a day trip where I drive to some area that I haven't been to before (or lately). I have uploaded almost 1400 photos to Commons, mainly Wisconsin cities and historic places. See [[Commons:Category:Files_by_User:Royalbroil_from_en.wikipedia]] '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
530327 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530324 +++$+++ 530326 +++$+++ 2009-04-19 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.240176540E09 +++$+++ Ahh, sorry...I've watched lots of NRHP sites for other states, but I've not gotten to Wisconsin yet.  Thanks :-)   +++$+++ :::Ahh, sorry...I've watched lots of NRHP sites for other states, but I've not gotten to Wisconsin yet.  Thanks :-)  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 14:29, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

394222 +++$+++ Bread Ninja +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ 394222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-24 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.287932280E09 +++$+++ just wondering how the chapters were going. you think they are notable enough to have their own article? +++$+++ just wondering how the chapters were going. you think they are notable enough to have their own article?[[User:Bread Ninja|Bread Ninja]] ([[User talk:Bread Ninja|talk]]) 07:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
394223 +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ 394222 +++$+++ 394222 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.287990600E09 +++$+++ I stopped work on the list once I exhausted [[Tokyopop]]'s published volumes (they published 10 volumes, but I don't know how many of the original Japanese volumes they cover), but ''Cyborg 009'' itself is definitely a notable series, so per [[WP:SPINOUT]] (which we use to cover all of our chapter\/episode lists, as long as the main series is notable), a separate chapter list would be fine. Just in case you missed\/forgot it, by the way, the chapter list I was working on is at [[User:Dinoguy1000\/Chapter lists#Cyborg 009]]; if you use that as a base for a full chapter list, please drop me a note saying so. =) <span style=white-space:nowrap>\u300c +++$+++ :I stopped work on the list once I exhausted [[Tokyopop]]'s published volumes (they published 10 volumes, but I don't know how many of the original Japanese volumes they cover), but ''Cyborg 009'' itself is definitely a notable series, so per [[WP:SPINOUT]] (which we use to cover all of our chapter/episode lists, as long as the main series is notable), a separate chapter list would be fine. Just in case you missed/forgot it, by the way, the chapter list I was working on is at [[User:Dinoguy1000/Chapter lists#Cyborg 009]]; if you use that as a base for a full chapter list, please drop me a note saying so. =) <span style=white-space:nowrap>「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#00f>ダイノ<span style=color:#080>ガイ]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#F90>千？！]]」<sup>[[Help:IJP|?]] · [[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|Talk⇒Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 00:10, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

268183 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-08 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.207676640E09 +++$+++ If you want to turn that red link in [['Opaeka'a Falls\u200e]] blue, there's [http:\/\/hawaii.gov\/dlnr\/dar\/pubs\/sawcs\/fwi_shrimp.pdf Mountain shrimp (Opaekala'ole)]. Here's the taxo data: [http:\/\/zipcodezoo.com\/Animals\/A\/Atyoida_bisulcata.asp] :) &mdash; +++$+++ If you want to turn that red link in [['Opaeka'a Falls‎]] blue, there's [http://hawaii.gov/dlnr/dar/pubs/sawcs/fwi_shrimp.pdf Mountain shrimp (Opaekala'ole)]. Here's the taxo data: [http://zipcodezoo.com/Animals/A/Atyoida_bisulcata.asp] :) &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 10:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268184 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268183 +++$+++ 268183 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.207709280E09 +++$+++ Yes, I'm keeping track of the DYK, so I'll add it to the newsletter page. Good job! &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes, I'm keeping track of the DYK, so I'll add it to the newsletter page. Good job! &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 19:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268185 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268183 +++$+++ 268184 +++$+++ 2008-04-09 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.207727040E09 +++$+++ Yes, we have news on the Portal there, but we need more news articles on Wikinews.  Most of the news is pretty old.  Is that what you mean? &mdash; +++$+++ ::Yes, we have news on the Portal there, but we need more news articles on Wikinews.  Most of the news is pretty old.  Is that what you mean? &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 00:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
268186 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268183 +++$+++ 268185 +++$+++ 2008-04-09 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.207727520E09 +++$+++ I can try to do that. I did that for the Cuban portal for a while but it {the protal) fell apart after the major coordinator left. The people I know there don't seem to know much about Hawaii in the sense of current events. Maybe while I there, I'll pick up wome local news.  It seems there are many active issues there.  &ndash; +++$+++ :::I can try to do that. I did that for the Cuban portal for a while but it {the protal) fell apart after the major coordinator left. The people I know there don't seem to know much about Hawaii in the sense of current events. Maybe while I there, I'll pick up wome local news.  It seems there are many active issues there.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
268187 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268183 +++$+++ 268186 +++$+++ 2008-04-09 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.207729680E09 +++$+++ Wow, that's amazing you would do that!  Have you ever worked on Wikinews before?  The Hawaii news portal can be found [http:\/\/en.wikinews.org\/wiki\/Hawaii here].  Do you know which island(s) you will be visiting? &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Wow, that's amazing you would do that!  Have you ever worked on Wikinews before?  The Hawaii news portal can be found [http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Hawaii here].  Do you know which island(s) you will be visiting? &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 01:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
268188 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268183 +++$+++ 268183 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.207715640E09 +++$+++ Please do not use edit summaries to make false personal attacks. I have never harassed you, and this is not the way to deal maturely with the fallout from your poor behavior. &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;  +++$+++ * Please do not use edit summaries to make false personal attacks. I have never harassed you, and this is not the way to deal maturely with the fallout from your poor behavior. &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] TR 21:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268189 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268183 +++$+++ 268188 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.207716540E09 +++$+++ Redthoreau, please stop harassing my on my user page. I am asking you for the thrid thime to please stop this harassment.  Please.  &ndash; +++$+++ ::Redthoreau, please stop harassing my on my user page. I am asking you for the thrid thime to please stop this harassment.  Please.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268190 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268183 +++$+++ 268189 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.207718520E09 +++$+++ I have never and will never harass you. I am allowed to request that you not use edit summaries to make attacks against me, and then close your talk page. For the '''10th + Time''' .. please stop casting aspersions against me ... so that I can stop having to defend myself. &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;  +++$+++ :::I have never and will never harass you. I am allowed to request that you not use edit summaries to make attacks against me, and then close your talk page. For the '''10th + Time''' .. please stop casting aspersions against me ... so that I can stop having to defend myself. &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] Redthoreau 22:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
268191 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268183 +++$+++ 268190 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.207718760E09 +++$+++ You are harassing me by continuing to post on my page. Coppertwig told another editor who was doing the same thing, that the page's editor opinion should be followed there is no reason for you to continue this. Go away.  &ndash; +++$+++ ::::You are harassing me by continuing to post on my page. Coppertwig told another editor who was doing the same thing, that the page's editor opinion should be followed there is no reason for you to continue this. Go away.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

530329 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530329 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-21 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.240300800E09 +++$+++ There are a few posts at [[WP:ERRORS]] saying people are having trouble seeing the DYK picture that's up now. Do you think you could switch it?  +++$+++ There are a few posts at [[WP:ERRORS]] saying people are having trouble seeing the DYK picture that's up now. Do you think you could switch it? [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 01:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
530330 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530329 +++$+++ 530329 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.240301040E09 +++$+++ I'll look to see what's going on. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I'll look to see what's going on. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
530331 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530329 +++$+++ 530330 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.240301700E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Also, in [[T:DYK\/Q2|queue 2]], second hook, [[uprising]] is a disambiguation page. There's no article for a generic uprising, so delink? Or link to wiktionary?  +++$+++ ::Thanks! Also, in [[T:DYK/Q2|queue 2]], second hook, [[uprising]] is a disambiguation page. There's no article for a generic uprising, so delink? Or link to wiktionary? [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 01:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
530332 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530329 +++$+++ 530331 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.240302000E09 +++$+++ Everyone knows what an uprising is, so I removed per [[WP:OVERLINK]]. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Everyone knows what an uprising is, so I removed per [[WP:OVERLINK]]. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
530333 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530329 +++$+++ 530332 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.240302300E09 +++$+++ Excellent. By the way, if we've figured out the [[bugzilla:18483|cascading protection issue]], I think I'll prod the devs to consider what they've classified the bug for: cascading protection reaching to Commons. I got a new email address over the weekend, so it would be easy to do. Heh, if they don't change the bug summary, let's get at what the bug's \"supposed\" to be :P  +++$+++ ::::Excellent. By the way, if we've figured out the [[bugzilla:18483|cascading protection issue]], I think I'll prod the devs to consider what they've classified the bug for: cascading protection reaching to Commons. I got a new email address over the weekend, so it would be easy to do. Heh, if they don't change the bug summary, let's get at what the bug's "supposed" to be :P [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 01:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

6045 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6045 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-08 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.297167660E09 +++$+++ Please come to the discussion at [[Talk:The Avengers (film project)#Maria Hill]]. I would like to hear your opinion.-- +++$+++ Please come to the discussion at [[Talk:The Avengers (film project)#Maria Hill]]. I would like to hear your opinion.--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 04:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
6046 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6045 +++$+++ 6045 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.297221120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your input and some good careful editing.-- +++$+++ :Thanks for your input and some good careful editing.--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 19:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
6047 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6045 +++$+++ 6046 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.297300080E09 +++$+++ I tried to come up with a compromise at [[Talk:The Avengers (film project)#Maria Hill]], let me know your thoughts. Thank you.-- +++$+++ ::I tried to come up with a compromise at [[Talk:The Avengers (film project)#Maria Hill]], let me know your thoughts. Thank you.--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 17:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
6048 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6045 +++$+++ 6047 +++$+++ 2011-02-11 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.297483500E09 +++$+++ Come back to discussion an editor might have found a valid source.-- +++$+++ :::Come back to discussion an editor might have found a valid source.--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 20:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

530334 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-21 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.240307820E09 +++$+++ I can do credits.  +++$+++ I can do credits. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 02:57, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
530335 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530334 +++$+++ 530334 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.240308360E09 +++$+++ Done, the queue can be cleared.  +++$+++ :Done, the queue can be cleared. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 03:06, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

530336 +++$+++ Victuallers +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530336 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-21 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.240366380E09 +++$+++ Just to aid the errors problem. The image that you swapped was protected. I wasnt aware that cascading protection was meant to work so I protected it for 3 days  +++$+++ Just to aid the errors problem. The image that you swapped was protected. I wasnt aware that cascading protection was meant to work so I protected it for 3 days [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 19:13, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
530337 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530336 +++$+++ 530336 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.240393080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for crediting, Shub. My Wifi internet got killed by rain before I could reply. The cascading protection appears to be working, so you shouldn't have to protect. I'd test each time just to be certain. The time that the image spends waiting in queues 1 to 6 gives it cascading protection before it hits the main page. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for crediting, Shub. My Wifi internet got killed by rain before I could reply. The cascading protection appears to be working, so you shouldn't have to protect. I'd test each time just to be certain. The time that the image spends waiting in queues 1 to 6 gives it cascading protection before it hits the main page. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

6049 +++$+++ Rusted AutoParts +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Seriously, why can't i add those names alongside the other girl? They screentested and i provided a source confirming that, so why are you being uptight about it? You're not in charge of the page. '' +++$+++ Seriously, why can't i add those names alongside the other girl? They screentested and i provided a source confirming that, so why are you being uptight about it? You're not in charge of the page. ''[[User: Rusted AutoParts|<font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font>]]'' ([[User talk:Rusted AutoParts|talk]]) 13:25 9 February 2011 (UTC)
6050 +++$+++ Rusted AutoParts +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6049 +++$+++ 6049 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I provided anoter source saying she screentested, yet it was still removed. Why? Please explain why Mary Elizabeth Winstead cannot be in the article. '' +++$+++ :I provided anoter source saying she screentested, yet it was still removed. Why? Please explain why Mary Elizabeth Winstead cannot be in the article. ''[[User: Rusted AutoParts|<font face="Rockwell" size="3" style="color:#000000;color:red"><i>Rusted AutoParts</i></font>]]'' ([[User talk:Rusted AutoParts|talk]]) 13:54 9 February 2011 (UTC)

268194 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268194 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-10 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.207818480E09 +++$+++ Hey, Mattisse.  Thanks for all your hard work.  You're doing a tremendous job.  Regarding the latest DYK, I wonder what you would think if we modified it somewhat.  Hawaii law makes it illegal to come closer than 100 yards to a humpback whale, so saying that \"a person can snorkel with\" them could be problematic.  This is especially true because the whales are visiting Hawaii to give birth, and we do not want to encourage snorkelers to break the law or interfere with calving.  This has already happened with the dolphin population in Maui.  Do you think we should modify the article and this statement to reflect the law?  +++$+++ Hey, Mattisse.  Thanks for all your hard work.  You're doing a tremendous job.  Regarding the latest DYK, I wonder what you would think if we modified it somewhat.  Hawaii law makes it illegal to come closer than 100 yards to a humpback whale, so saying that "a person can snorkel with" them could be problematic.  This is especially true because the whales are visiting Hawaii to give birth, and we do not want to encourage snorkelers to break the law or interfere with calving.  This has already happened with the dolphin population in Maui.  Do you think we should modify the article and this statement to reflect the law? [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 02:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
268195 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268194 +++$+++ 268194 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.207819620E09 +++$+++ Ok, I just went to verify the statement \"divers can snorkel with them\" and couldn't find it in the reference given.  Do you have another one?  +++$+++ :Ok, I just went to verify the statement "divers can snorkel with them" and couldn't find it in the reference given.  Do you have another one? [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 02:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
268196 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268194 +++$+++ 268195 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.207820160E09 +++$+++ Here's a summary of the [http:\/\/hawaii.gov\/dlnr\/dbor\/pdf\/HIHWNMSBRO.pdf official rules] where it clearly states \"do not...swim with...humpback whales...\" So what I will do is remove the info from the article and submit a new DYK.  +++$+++ ::Here's a summary of the [http://hawaii.gov/dlnr/dbor/pdf/HIHWNMSBRO.pdf official rules] where it clearly states "do not...swim with...humpback whales..." So what I will do is remove the info from the article and submit a new DYK. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 02:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
268197 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268194 +++$+++ 268196 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.207823520E09 +++$+++ I've resubmitted the DYK under your name.  Please go ahead and make any changes or just rewrite it.  +++$+++ :::I've resubmitted the DYK under your name.  Please go ahead and make any changes or just rewrite it. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 03:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

530339 +++$+++ ChesterMarcol +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-21 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.240373460E09 +++$+++ I removed the picture you added to the Roncalli High School article because the picture is actually of Manitowoc Lutheran High School.  I know it was just a mistake but just giving you a heads up on that one.  -- +++$+++ I removed the picture you added to the Roncalli High School article because the picture is actually of Manitowoc Lutheran High School.  I know it was just a mistake but just giving you a heads up on that one.  --[[User:ChesterMarcol|ChesterMarcol]] ([[User talk:ChesterMarcol|talk]]) 21:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
530340 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530339 +++$+++ 530339 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.240391880E09 +++$+++ Ummm, are you sure? I went to [[Superchick]]'s touring opening concert at the school to take the picture. Their myspace page and [http:\/\/www.zvents.com\/manitowoc-wi\/events\/show\/86623995-superchick-hey-hey-tour-spring-2009 this page] agree it was held at Roncalli. The school is located on Mirro Dr. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Ummm, are you sure? I went to [[Superchick]]'s touring opening concert at the school to take the picture. Their myspace page and [http://www.zvents.com/manitowoc-wi/events/show/86623995-superchick-hey-hey-tour-spring-2009 this page] agree it was held at Roncalli. The school is located on Mirro Dr. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:18, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
530341 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530339 +++$+++ 530340 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.240392900E09 +++$+++ I looked up the address for [[Manitowoc Lutheran High School]]. I drove by it on the way to the concert not knowing that was Manty Lutheran. Had I known I would have taken a picture. I assumed it was a grade school. Be assured that both pictures on the Roncalli article were the same school. Look at the time stamp on the images, they should be within about 5 minutes which is too fast to drive between the schools. Maybe you're confused about the banner on the school - the concert was sponsored by several different denominations including Lutherans and Catholics. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I looked up the address for [[Manitowoc Lutheran High School]]. I drove by it on the way to the concert not knowing that was Manty Lutheran. Had I known I would have taken a picture. I assumed it was a grade school. Be assured that both pictures on the Roncalli article were the same school. Look at the time stamp on the images, they should be within about 5 minutes which is too fast to drive between the schools. Maybe you're confused about the banner on the school - the concert was sponsored by several different denominations including Lutherans and Catholics. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:35, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
530342 +++$+++ ChesterMarcol +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530339 +++$+++ 530341 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.240453260E09 +++$+++ I am 100% sure that is MLHS.  I graduated from MLHS.  That picture is of the back of the school from Waldo Blvd.  The section of the school to the right is an addition to the music dept. that was finished last year which covered up the back of the stage, which you can see rising up from the building, which used to say \"Manitowoc Lutheran High School\" in big white letters.  You can see the edge of the trailer park that is next to the school on the right.  I could tell you whose red Honda Civic is parked in the parking lot.-- +++$+++ :::I am 100% sure that is MLHS.  I graduated from MLHS.  That picture is of the back of the school from Waldo Blvd.  The section of the school to the right is an addition to the music dept. that was finished last year which covered up the back of the stage, which you can see rising up from the building, which used to say "Manitowoc Lutheran High School" in big white letters.  You can see the edge of the trailer park that is next to the school on the right.  I could tell you whose red Honda Civic is parked in the parking lot.--[[User:ChesterMarcol|ChesterMarcol]] ([[User talk:ChesterMarcol|talk]]) 19:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
530343 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-23 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.240475820E09 +++$+++ I looked at the time stamp, 12 minutes apart. You're right, it does look like a different school. Looking at the original uncropped image, it has a divided highway in the foreground with grass on the median. There's no divided highway on Mirro Drive, right? So it looks like you both are right! Thanks for correcting me and sticking to your guns. I'll add it to the MLHS article. This is even better - pictures for 2 articles! I'll get the image renamed on Commons - I'm an admin there now. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::I looked at the time stamp, 12 minutes apart. You're right, it does look like a different school. Looking at the original uncropped image, it has a divided highway in the foreground with grass on the median. There's no divided highway on Mirro Drive, right? So it looks like you both are right! Thanks for correcting me and sticking to your guns. I'll add it to the MLHS article. This is even better - pictures for 2 articles! I'll get the image renamed on Commons - I'm an admin there now. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:37, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
530344 +++$+++ ChesterMarcol +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530339 +++$+++ 530340 +++$+++ 2009-04-23 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.240477320E09 +++$+++ You had me thinking I was going crazy for a minute, and Mirro Drive isn't divided. I have noticed alot of your pictures on articles for locations in this area it really adds alot to the articles to have pictures, keep up the good work.-- +++$+++ ::You had me thinking I was going crazy for a minute, and Mirro Drive isn't divided. I have noticed alot of your pictures on articles for locations in this area it really adds alot to the articles to have pictures, keep up the good work.--[[User:ChesterMarcol|ChesterMarcol]] ([[User talk:ChesterMarcol|talk]]) 02:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
530345 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530339 +++$+++ 530344 +++$+++ 2009-04-23 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.240481100E09 +++$+++ I'm glad we got it solved. I haven't concentrated on your area, I've taken pictures all over the eastern half of Wisconsin. I;m approaching 1500 pictures on Commons. I'm glad to hear they're appreciated! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::I'm glad we got it solved. I haven't concentrated on your area, I've taken pictures all over the eastern half of Wisconsin. I;m approaching 1500 pictures on Commons. I'm glad to hear they're appreciated! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:05, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

6054 +++$+++ REVUpminster +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-26 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.298751300E09 +++$+++ Sorry to bring this up, but on todays featured article [[Dustbin Baby (film)]] they use as references to a dvd the commercial sites of Lovefilm and play.com so i think if it's good enough for a featured article then surely I could use it for Queen of Swords because there is nothing else. Also do you think theses sections should be changed to  Home media that is used on a number of articles. Do you know what the policy is as most of the articles  I visit it is split between Home media or DVD release.Thankyou +++$+++ Sorry to bring this up, but on todays featured article [[Dustbin Baby (film)]] they use as references to a dvd the commercial sites of Lovefilm and play.com so i think if it's good enough for a featured article then surely I could use it for Queen of Swords because there is nothing else. Also do you think theses sections should be changed to  Home media that is used on a number of articles. Do you know what the policy is as most of the articles  I visit it is split between Home media or DVD release.Thankyou[[User:REVUpminster|REVUpminster]] ([[User talk:REVUpminster|talk]]) 12:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
6055 +++$+++ REVUpminster +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6054 +++$+++ 6054 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.299123180E09 +++$+++ I have noticed and I am still not sure what the outcome is. Shall I put the refs back as my chance of finding a review in either French or Japanese would be almost non existant. Sony did such a good job of burying  this series. I'd leave the VHS needing to be refrenced as someone else might be able to do it, the original editor maybe? Incidently Alliance films (canada) have been releasing old Fireworks TV such as Relic Hunter and Adventure Inc so I hope they get round to QoS. Thankyou +++$+++ *I have noticed and I am still not sure what the outcome is. Shall I put the refs back as my chance of finding a review in either French or Japanese would be almost non existant. Sony did such a good job of burying  this series. I'd leave the VHS needing to be refrenced as someone else might be able to do it, the original editor maybe? Incidently Alliance films (canada) have been releasing old Fireworks TV such as Relic Hunter and Adventure Inc so I hope they get round to QoS. Thankyou[[User:REVUpminster|REVUpminster]] ([[User talk:REVUpminster|talk]]) 19:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6056 +++$+++ REVUpminster +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6054 +++$+++ 6054 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.299123780E09 +++$+++ Oddly enough I found this link http:\/\/www.dvdfr.com\/dvd\/f23059-sous-le-signe-de-l-epee.html but the aspect ratio is wrong as I own this dvd. +++$+++ *Oddly enough I found this link http://www.dvdfr.com/dvd/f23059-sous-le-signe-de-l-epee.html but the aspect ratio is wrong as I own this dvd.[[User:REVUpminster|REVUpminster]] ([[User talk:REVUpminster|talk]]) 19:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

268199 +++$+++ Occuli +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-10 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.207846140E09 +++$+++ I must say I find much of your work on categories to be in error. Can you not stop for a while and think more carefully about placing articles in the most appropriate categories (ie the most exact ones, not the most general) and in particular about which categories are subcategories of other ones? Moving subcats around makes a complete mess unless done properly. (Eg there is no obvious connection between human trafficking and sexual offences. Most sexual offences are nothing to do with trafficking; some trafficking is nothing to do with sex; neither is a subcat of the other.) You also seem to think there is a problem if a cat has several parents - there is none whatsoever - if all As are Bs then cat of As is a subcat of cat of Bs.  +++$+++ I must say I find much of your work on categories to be in error. Can you not stop for a while and think more carefully about placing articles in the most appropriate categories (ie the most exact ones, not the most general) and in particular about which categories are subcategories of other ones? Moving subcats around makes a complete mess unless done properly. (Eg there is no obvious connection between human trafficking and sexual offences. Most sexual offences are nothing to do with trafficking; some trafficking is nothing to do with sex; neither is a subcat of the other.) You also seem to think there is a problem if a cat has several parents - there is none whatsoever - if all As are Bs then cat of As is a subcat of cat of Bs. [[User:Occuli|Occuli]] ([[User talk:Occuli|talk]]) 09:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
268200 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268199 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.207857600E09 +++$+++ Why don't you join the discussions under '''Cateories''' and express you views there?  &ndash; +++$+++ ::Why don't you join the discussions under '''Cateories''' and express you views there?  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

6057 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-02 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.299108600E09 +++$+++ With all due respect, go away. I have no idea what you're talking about, you're just making a mess of things.  +++$+++ With all due respect, go away. I have no idea what you're talking about, you're just making a mess of things. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 15:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6058 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6057 +++$+++ 6057 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.299109680E09 +++$+++ Never once did I say \"With all due respect you don't know what you're talking about.\". If you want to play the lawyer game, the page you linked says that \"one should generally avoid\" those kind of links, ''not'' that they are banned, and specifically notes that \"This guideline concerns external links that are '''not citations to sources supporting article content'''.\" If you want to play the \"common sense\" game, you're the one removing reliable sources from a featured article, leaving content uncited... And no, we don't need a RfC. We need you to reread the policy page you're throwing around as gospel truth.  +++$+++ :Never once did I say "With all due respect you don't know what you're talking about.". If you want to play the lawyer game, the page you linked says that "one should generally avoid" those kind of links, ''not'' that they are banned, and specifically notes that "This guideline concerns external links that are '''not citations to sources supporting article content'''." If you want to play the "common sense" game, you're the one removing reliable sources from a featured article, leaving content uncited... And no, we don't need a RfC. We need you to reread the policy page you're throwing around as gospel truth. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 15:48, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6059 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6057 +++$+++ 6058 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.299110340E09 +++$+++ As you've quite clearly broken the 3RR yourself, I [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Edit_warring#User:Tenebrae_reported_by_J_Milburn_.28talk.29_.28Result:_.29|have reported you]]. I've really got better things to be doing than this.  +++$+++ ::As you've quite clearly broken the 3RR yourself, I [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Tenebrae_reported_by_J_Milburn_.28talk.29_.28Result:_.29|have reported you]]. I've really got better things to be doing than this. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 15:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6060 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6057 +++$+++ 6059 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.299111780E09 +++$+++ Out of respect if I had my way both of you are guilty of being uncivilized on this one. It only makes it seem questionable how much a article should be a featured article when there is a edit war going on in it.  +++$+++ :::Out of respect if I had my way both of you are guilty of being uncivilized on this one. It only makes it seem questionable how much a article should be a featured article when there is a edit war going on in it. [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 16:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6061 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6057 +++$+++ 6060 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.299111960E09 +++$+++ Well, I do respect your word and your comments, [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style=\"border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue\">Jhenderson<\/span>]]. You're a good and thoughtful editor. Perhaps [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] and I could together search for journalistic sources, e.g., reviews of the DVDs, articles about \"this week's DVD releases,\" etc. I will say I offered mediation and conflict resolution in the form of an RfC, and he refused. -- +++$+++ ::::Well, I do respect your word and your comments, [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]. You're a good and thoughtful editor. Perhaps [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] and I could together search for journalistic sources, e.g., reviews of the DVDs, articles about "this week's DVD releases," etc. I will say I offered mediation and conflict resolution in the form of an RfC, and he refused. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 16:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6062 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6057 +++$+++ 6061 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.299112620E09 +++$+++ Do you really think I haven't looked for sources like that? You'd think I'd never seen this article before. Seriously, go away.  +++$+++ :::::Do you really think I haven't looked for sources like that? You'd think I'd never seen this article before. Seriously, go away. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 16:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6063 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6057 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.299112920E09 +++$+++ Please quit saying go away. It's not very civil. Why don't you try to get along instead.  +++$+++ :::::::Please quit saying go away. It's not very civil. Why don't you try to get along instead. [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 16:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

268203 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-11 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.207980300E09 +++$+++ I love the image you added ([[:Image:P2200054 h.jpg]]) but I don't see what it has to do with the article.  Having seen that lava flow, it's nowhere near the road.  You have to hike down to the lava tube about 1-2 miles.  +++$+++ I love the image you added ([[:Image:P2200054 h.jpg]]) but I don't see what it has to do with the article.  Having seen that lava flow, it's nowhere near the road.  You have to hike down to the lava tube about 1-2 miles. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 23:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
268204 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.207980840E09 +++$+++ It is mentioned in my book about Crater Rim Drive: \"Within half a mile of the intersection with Crater Rim Drive, Chain of Craters Road crosses a narrow flow of pahoehoe lave that errupted in 1874, then reaches Lua Manu, the first pit crater.\"  ???? &ndash; +++$+++ ::It is mentioned in my book about Crater Rim Drive: "Within half a mile of the intersection with Crater Rim Drive, Chain of Craters Road crosses a narrow flow of pahoehoe lave that errupted in 1874, then reaches Lua Manu, the first pit crater."  ???? &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
268205 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.207981020E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's old lava.  The photo you added is about 1-2 miles from the end of the road.  You can't really see active lava like that from the road; you actually have to hike ''onto'' the lava!  Anyway, not to worry.  I found the pics you need on flickr and I'm uploading them now for you.  No worries.  +++$+++ :::Yes, that's old lava.  The photo you added is about 1-2 miles from the end of the road.  You can't really see active lava like that from the road; you actually have to hike ''onto'' the lava!  Anyway, not to worry.  I found the pics you need on flickr and I'm uploading them now for you.  No worries. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 23:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
268206 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.207981080E09 +++$+++ I have to step out right now and get some lunch. I'll upload the photos in a few hours or so.  +++$+++ ::::I have to step out right now and get some lunch. I'll upload the photos in a few hours or so. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 23:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
268207 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.207981260E09 +++$+++ Sounds like you should be writing this article! I am just trying to figure out what is there. &ndash; +++$+++ :::::Sounds like you should be writing this article! I am just trying to figure out what is there. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:21, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
268208 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.208008380E09 +++$+++ You are doing great.  I just wanted to point out that the photo was taken miles from the road.  Flickr is easy to use.  Anyone can use their photos on Wikipedia as long as it meets the strict licensing requirement on this site.   +++$+++ ::::::You are doing great.  I just wanted to point out that the photo was taken miles from the road.  Flickr is easy to use.  Anyone can use their photos on Wikipedia as long as it meets the strict licensing requirement on this site.  [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 06:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
268209 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.208017680E09 +++$+++ FYI...[http:\/\/www.nps.gov\/havo\/planyourvisit\/upload\/map_park.pdf this map] (PDF) will explain why the active lava flows (like the photo you added) can't be seen very well from the road.  Look for the flow dates and you'll understand.  I believe there are locations where you can see flows in the east rift zone from a great distance during the day with binoculars, but it's pretty rare.  +++$+++ :::::::FYI...[http://www.nps.gov/havo/planyourvisit/upload/map_park.pdf this map] (PDF) will explain why the active lava flows (like the photo you added) can't be seen very well from the road.  Look for the flow dates and you'll understand.  I believe there are locations where you can see flows in the east rift zone from a great distance during the day with binoculars, but it's pretty rare. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 09:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
268210 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.208028360E09 +++$+++ BTW, I didn't upload any photos as there seem to be a few on commons already.  +++$+++ ::::::BTW, I didn't upload any photos as there seem to be a few on commons already. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 12:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

6064 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-02 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.299116100E09 +++$+++ Do not [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Dustbin_Baby_%28film%29&diff=prev&oldid=416762962 remove my comments] without good reason. It'd also be good if, y'know, you could ''answer the question''.  +++$+++ Do not [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dustbin_Baby_%28film%29&diff=prev&oldid=416762962 remove my comments] without good reason. It'd also be good if, y'know, you could ''answer the question''. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 17:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6065 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.299116340E09 +++$+++ I ''did not'' remove your content. We evidently had an edit conflict. I resent the implication as I have done nothing in these proceedings that would even ''suggest'' that I would do such a thing. Your incivility and lack of good faith are remarkable.-- +++$+++ :I ''did not'' remove your content. We evidently had an edit conflict. I resent the implication as I have done nothing in these proceedings that would even ''suggest'' that I would do such a thing. Your incivility and lack of good faith are remarkable.--[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 17:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6066 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 6065 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.299116580E09 +++$+++ Erm, no, you did remove my comment, there is literally no way you could even argue that that is not the case. ''Look at the diff''. Dear God.  +++$+++ ::Erm, no, you did remove my comment, there is literally no way you could even argue that that is not the case. ''Look at the diff''. Dear God. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 17:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6067 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 6066 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.299117180E09 +++$+++ It shows up that way sometimes when there's an edit conflict and one takes the \"Your text\" and puts it into the top box. Your blasphemous comment aside, you are wrong here. I did not remove your comment. In my entire history of Wikipedia, nearly 48,000 edits, I have never removed another editor's comments. Why would I start now? Your lack of [[WP:GOODFAITH|good faith]] is appalling.-- +++$+++ :::It shows up that way sometimes when there's an edit conflict and one takes the "Your text" and puts it into the top box. Your blasphemous comment aside, you are wrong here. I did not remove your comment. In my entire history of Wikipedia, nearly 48,000 edits, I have never removed another editor's comments. Why would I start now? Your lack of [[WP:GOODFAITH|good faith]] is appalling.--[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 17:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6068 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 6067 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.299117600E09 +++$+++ You removed my comment. Why, or how, I don't know or care. ''But you removed the comment.'' [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Dustbin_Baby_%28film%29&diff=prev&oldid=416762962 Look]; see how, before your edit, there is my comment, and after it, there isn't? You removed it. No assumption of bad faith. No \"blasphemy\". A simple fact. You removed my comment. I am asking you not to do that.  +++$+++ ::::You removed my comment. Why, or how, I don't know or care. ''But you removed the comment.'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dustbin_Baby_%28film%29&diff=prev&oldid=416762962 Look]; see how, before your edit, there is my comment, and after it, there isn't? You removed it. No assumption of bad faith. No "blasphemy". A simple fact. You removed my comment. I am asking you not to do that. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 18:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6069 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 6067 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.299118140E09 +++$+++ I did not remove your content. An \"edit conflict\" screen came up, I put my \"your text\" into the main box, and that was all I did. How the programming works from there, I don't know. But I did ''not'' even ''touch'' your content. If you don't believe me for any other reason, just consider that I have no ''reason'' to remove your content, and even if I ''did'' have some cockamamie reason, do you seriously believe an editor of over 5 1\/2 years and 48,000 edits doesn't know what a History page tracks? Jeeminy Christmas. I did ''not'' touch your comment. -- +++$+++ ::::I did not remove your content. An "edit conflict" screen came up, I put my "your text" into the main box, and that was all I did. How the programming works from there, I don't know. But I did ''not'' even ''touch'' your content. If you don't believe me for any other reason, just consider that I have no ''reason'' to remove your content, and even if I ''did'' have some cockamamie reason, do you seriously believe an editor of over 5 1/2 years and 48,000 edits doesn't know what a History page tracks? Jeeminy Christmas. I did ''not'' touch your comment. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 18:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6070 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 6069 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.299118380E09 +++$+++ You telling me I can't blaspheme now?! Look, I'm sorry, this is ridiculous. No matter what you say, no matter what arguments you make, your edit removed my comment. If it wasn't you, that's fine, I can block your account as compromised. If it was you, then you can shut up.  +++$+++ :::::You telling me I can't blaspheme now?! Look, I'm sorry, this is ridiculous. No matter what you say, no matter what arguments you make, your edit removed my comment. If it wasn't you, that's fine, I can block your account as compromised. If it was you, then you can shut up. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 18:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6071 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 6070 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.299120000E09 +++$+++ I haven't once threatened you. I have repeatedly said I think that you should be blocked, but that's a very different thing. You are responsible for your edits. Whether it was an edit conflict or the wrong box or whatever, you removed my comment, and all you have done is sat there and denied it with the diff right in front of you. How you can do that in good conscience is beyond me.  +++$+++ ::::::I haven't once threatened you. I have repeatedly said I think that you should be blocked, but that's a very different thing. You are responsible for your edits. Whether it was an edit conflict or the wrong box or whatever, you removed my comment, and all you have done is sat there and denied it with the diff right in front of you. How you can do that in good conscience is beyond me. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 18:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6072 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.299120780E09 +++$+++ Sorry to be a talk page stalker but I feel that I must say this.  To Milburn it seems that Tenebrae hasn't noticed that he did it. So it probably should be let go whether true or not. And also to Tenebrae even it wasn't on purpose stating that you are sorry can probably make an argument go away quicker. I admit it's hard for me as well. Happy editing!  +++$+++ *Sorry to be a talk page stalker but I feel that I must say this.  To Milburn it seems that Tenebrae hasn't noticed that he did it. So it probably should be let go whether true or not. And also to Tenebrae even it wasn't on purpose stating that you are sorry can probably make an argument go away quicker. I admit it's hard for me as well. Happy editing! [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 18:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6073 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 6071 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.299120240E09 +++$+++ For me to have removed your content, I would have had to go in, block it, and erase it. Or put my cursor at the end of it and erase backwards. I did no such things. I moved my content from \"Your text\" to the top box. Whatever the programming does after that I have no control over. But that is ''all'' I did. -- +++$+++ :::::::For me to have removed your content, I would have had to go in, block it, and erase it. Or put my cursor at the end of it and erase backwards. I did no such things. I moved my content from "Your text" to the top box. Whatever the programming does after that I have no control over. But that is ''all'' I did. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 18:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6074 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 6073 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.299120720E09 +++$+++ What part of that do you not agree with?  +++$+++ ::::::::What part of that do you not agree with? [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 18:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6075 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6064 +++$+++ 6074 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.299120780E09 +++$+++ And if you interpret that as a threat, I can't help you.  +++$+++ :::::::::And if you interpret that as a threat, I can't help you. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 18:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

268212 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268212 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-12 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.208042520E09 +++$+++ Good work as always, and I'm glad to see you are going full-speed ahead into ''terra incognita'', but if you take a look at the lead paragraph for [[K\u012blauea]], you'll see that it already says, \"K\u012blauea is currently the most active volcano on the planet,[1]\", and a few sentences later, you added: It is the world's most active volcano.[2]  Don't worry, I've done that kind of thing before.  MIght be time for a self-revert? :-)   BTW, congrats on ''another'' DYK!  +++$+++ Good work as always, and I'm glad to see you are going full-speed ahead into ''terra incognita'', but if you take a look at the lead paragraph for [[Kīlauea]], you'll see that it already says, "Kīlauea is currently the most active volcano on the planet,[1]", and a few sentences later, you added: It is the world's most active volcano.[2]  Don't worry, I've done that kind of thing before.  MIght be time for a self-revert? :-)   BTW, congrats on ''another'' DYK! [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 16:22, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
268213 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268212 +++$+++ 268212 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.208042760E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I noticed that afterward. Sorry! The Humpback Whale DKY is now on the main page. &ndash; +++$+++ :Yeah, I noticed that afterward. Sorry! The Humpback Whale DKY is now on the main page. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
268214 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268212 +++$+++ 268213 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.208042940E09 +++$+++ I know.  I added it to the newsletter before you were even aware of it.  I'm keeping track. :-)  +++$+++ ::I know.  I added it to the newsletter before you were even aware of it.  I'm keeping track. :-) [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 16:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
268215 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268212 +++$+++ 268214 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.208043180E09 +++$+++ Where is the newsletter? (I have a hard time finding things on wikipedia.) I was looking at the portal yesterday. Who is in charge of it? &ndash; +++$+++ :::Where is the newsletter? (I have a hard time finding things on wikipedia.) I was looking at the portal yesterday. Who is in charge of it? &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:33, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
268216 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268212 +++$+++ 268215 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.208043420E09 +++$+++ I'll leave you a link to the newsletter below this section.  I've been adding you to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Hawaii\/Outreach\/News_Bureau|News Bureau]] page for inclusion in May's issue.  [[User:Jonny-mt|Jonny-mt]] is currently in charge of the Portal, but he's recruiting volunteers to help out and if you go to the project talk page, you'll see a list of tasks he needs done.  If you want to help out, just contact him.  I'm going to leave you a link to the newsletter below, but I'm going offline for the next eight hours (or more)  Enjoy your day.  +++$+++ ::::I'll leave you a link to the newsletter below this section.  I've been adding you to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Hawaii/Outreach/News_Bureau|News Bureau]] page for inclusion in May's issue.  [[User:Jonny-mt|Jonny-mt]] is currently in charge of the Portal, but he's recruiting volunteers to help out and if you go to the project talk page, you'll see a list of tasks he needs done.  If you want to help out, just contact him.  I'm going to leave you a link to the newsletter below, but I'm going offline for the next eight hours (or more)  Enjoy your day. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 16:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

530359 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530359 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-27 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.240820340E09 +++$+++ You up for an update? From [[T:DYK\/Q5|queue 5]]. I can do credits.  +++$+++ You up for an update? From [[T:DYK/Q5|queue 5]]. I can do credits. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 01:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
530360 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530359 +++$+++ 530359 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.240820520E09 +++$+++ Yep, I hope my internet connect can last for a few more minutes (rain is coming in). '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Yep, I hope my internet connect can last for a few more minutes (rain is coming in). '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
530361 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530359 +++$+++ 530360 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.240821060E09 +++$+++ Thank you! It's funny that a week ago I had 78 edits on my talk page and 61 on yours. Maybe I should start talking to myself :)  +++$+++ ::Thank you! It's funny that a week ago I had 78 edits on my talk page and 61 on yours. Maybe I should start talking to myself :) [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 01:31, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
530362 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530359 +++$+++ 530361 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.240826760E09 +++$+++ Wow, that's a lot of edits to my talk page! Thank you for prompting me! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Wow, that's a lot of edits to my talk page! Thank you for prompting me! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

394228 +++$+++ Bws2cool +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ 394228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-24 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.290635340E09 +++$+++ Some articles are in the evo lines like [[Abra, Kadabra, and Alakazam]] and [[Koffing and Weezing]] because their reception fits all of them. It covers the whole line, and makes them notable as a whole. Articles such as [[Charmander]], [[Charmeleon]], and [[Charizard]] are kept apart because their reception has to do with them as individual, and they would probably be difficult to merge, and would break [[Charizard]]'s GA. <sub style=\"color:#00008B;\">''' +++$+++ Some articles are in the evo lines like [[Abra, Kadabra, and Alakazam]] and [[Koffing and Weezing]] because their reception fits all of them. It covers the whole line, and makes them notable as a whole. Articles such as [[Charmander]], [[Charmeleon]], and [[Charizard]] are kept apart because their reception has to do with them as individual, and they would probably be difficult to merge, and would break [[Charizard]]'s GA. <sub style="color:#00008B;">'''[[User:Bws2cool|Blake]]'''</sub> <sup>([[User talk:Bws2cool#top|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Bws2cool|Edits]])</sup> 13:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
394229 +++$+++ Bread Ninja +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ 394228 +++$+++ 394228 +++$+++ 2010-11-24 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.290635580E09 +++$+++ This user is retired. +++$+++ :This user is retired.[[User:Bread Ninja|Bread Ninja]] ([[User talk:Bread Ninja|talk]]) 13:53, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
394230 +++$+++ Bws2cool +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ 394228 +++$+++ 394229 +++$+++ 2010-11-24 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.290642540E09 +++$+++ If you look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Dinoguy1000 his contributions] you will see he has made edits. Being retired doesn't mean you fall of the face of the earth. You just don't edit as much. Dino made a comment in an edit summary, and I was replying to it. <sub style=\"color:#00008B;\">''' +++$+++ ::If you look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000 his contributions] you will see he has made edits. Being retired doesn't mean you fall of the face of the earth. You just don't edit as much. Dino made a comment in an edit summary, and I was replying to it. <sub style="color:#00008B;">'''[[User:Bws2cool|Blake]]'''</sub> <sup>([[User talk:Bws2cool#top|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Bws2cool|Edits]])</sup> 15:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
394231 +++$+++ Bread Ninja +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ 394228 +++$+++ 394230 +++$+++ 2010-11-24 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.290643200E09 +++$+++ i would agree, with semi retired. But retired would be even less than what you're suggesting. Such as one or two edits a month if not more. +++$+++ :::i would agree, with semi retired. But retired would be even less than what you're suggesting. Such as one or two edits a month if not more.[[User:Bread Ninja|Bread Ninja]] ([[User talk:Bread Ninja|talk]]) 16:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
394232 +++$+++ Bws2cool +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ 394228 +++$+++ 394231 +++$+++ 2010-11-24 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.290646800E09 +++$+++ This doesn't matter. The fact is, TODAY he made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Pok%C3%A9mon&action=historysubmit&diff=398594036&oldid=396509681 an edit]. I was replying to his edit. Being retired doesn't mean its against the rules to contact them or anything. If you were trying to tell me that he might not reply to this for a while because he is retired, anybody can see from the top of the page that he is retired. You don't need to repeat it. <sub style=\"color:#00008B;\">''' +++$+++ ::::This doesn't matter. The fact is, TODAY he made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Pok%C3%A9mon&action=historysubmit&diff=398594036&oldid=396509681 an edit]. I was replying to his edit. Being retired doesn't mean its against the rules to contact them or anything. If you were trying to tell me that he might not reply to this for a while because he is retired, anybody can see from the top of the page that he is retired. You don't need to repeat it. <sub style="color:#00008B;">'''[[User:Bws2cool|Blake]]'''</sub> <sup>([[User talk:Bws2cool#top|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Bws2cool|Edits]])</sup> 17:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
394233 +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ Dinoguy1000 +++$+++ 394228 +++$+++ 394229 +++$+++ 2010-11-24 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.290651360E09 +++$+++ @Bws2cool: Yep, I knew that some of the evo lines were already treated in one article, and of course I'm not suggesting to start blindly merging\/expanding individual species articles to cover the whole evo line. Think of it more as me wondering if the feasibility of this was ever discussed, or if any specific proposals were ever made (and if not, then also as a spark for such discussion). ;) <span style=white-space:nowrap>\u300c +++$+++ ::@Bws2cool: Yep, I knew that some of the evo lines were already treated in one article, and of course I'm not suggesting to start blindly merging/expanding individual species articles to cover the whole evo line. Think of it more as me wondering if the feasibility of this was ever discussed, or if any specific proposals were ever made (and if not, then also as a spark for such discussion). ;) <span style=white-space:nowrap>「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#00f>ダイノ<span style=color:#080>ガイ]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#F90>千？！]]」<sup>[[Help:IJP|?]] · [[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|Talk⇒Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 18:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

268218 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-12 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.208043840E09 +++$+++ I've noticed your good edits on the beautiful Hawaiian isalnds. Keep up the work!  +++$+++ I've noticed your good edits on the beautiful Hawaiian isalnds. Keep up the work! [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">'''$1,000,000?'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 16:44, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
268219 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268218 +++$+++ 268218 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.208044200E09 +++$+++ Thanks! It's always great to be noticed.  &ndash; +++$+++ :Thanks! It's always great to be noticed.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

6076 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6076 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.299121080E09 +++$+++ But [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style=\"border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue\">Jhenderson<\/span>]] is right.I will say sorry for the bad feelings. Since neither of us is going to convince the other of his point, let's move on. -- +++$+++ But [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]] is right.I will say sorry for the bad feelings. Since neither of us is going to convince the other of his point, let's move on. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 18:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6077 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6076 +++$+++ 6076 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.299121440E09 +++$+++ So be it, I'm going out for a bit. I don't care how this is resolved as long as no information is lost and ''everything'' is cited to a decent source, but I'd like to see the article unprotected ASAP.  +++$+++ :So be it, I'm going out for a bit. I don't care how this is resolved as long as no information is lost and ''everything'' is cited to a decent source, but I'd like to see the article unprotected ASAP. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 19:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

6078 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6078 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-02 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.299129360E09 +++$+++ I've some fresh air and a decent meal now, so I'm feeling better. I was feeling a little stressed for non-Wikipedia reasons, so you caught me at a bad time, I guess. That wasn't your fault. I'm sorry, this whole thing has been a colossal mess. We've been talking at cross-purposes an awful lot, and I think we've had some real difficulty in understanding each other to a certain extent. I'm sorry if I've come across as overly aggressive\/defensive; I stand by what I have said for the most part, but I appreciate that your intentions were sound. I think now that there is neither an active edit war nor protection of the article (as in, now I'm sure the article is safe, which has always been my first priority- of all \"my\" articles, this one is probably \"my baby\") I feel a lot better\/calmer about the whole situation. A truce? If not friends, at least colleagues?  +++$+++ I've some fresh air and a decent meal now, so I'm feeling better. I was feeling a little stressed for non-Wikipedia reasons, so you caught me at a bad time, I guess. That wasn't your fault. I'm sorry, this whole thing has been a colossal mess. We've been talking at cross-purposes an awful lot, and I think we've had some real difficulty in understanding each other to a certain extent. I'm sorry if I've come across as overly aggressive/defensive; I stand by what I have said for the most part, but I appreciate that your intentions were sound. I think now that there is neither an active edit war nor protection of the article (as in, now I'm sure the article is safe, which has always been my first priority- of all "my" articles, this one is probably "my baby") I feel a lot better/calmer about the whole situation. A truce? If not friends, at least colleagues? [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
6079 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6078 +++$+++ 6078 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.299130560E09 +++$+++ I admire your candor and your thoughtfulness, and I, too, am sorry for my own part in what escalated further than two experienced editors such as ourselves should have let occur. I'm absolutely happy to consider you a collegial colleague &mdash; someone who cares passionately about this project is a valuable resource. (Though I'm glad you put \"my\" in quotation marks.) Looking on the bright side, I've learned yet another nuance of the many Wikipedia policies and guidelines. So: No hard feelings, and I'll do what I can to rectify things. I appreciate your being an honorable person and having the integrity to post what you have. With genuine regards, -- +++$+++ :I admire your candor and your thoughtfulness, and I, too, am sorry for my own part in what escalated further than two experienced editors such as ourselves should have let occur. I'm absolutely happy to consider you a collegial colleague &mdash; someone who cares passionately about this project is a valuable resource. (Though I'm glad you put "my" in quotation marks.) Looking on the bright side, I've learned yet another nuance of the many Wikipedia policies and guidelines. So: No hard feelings, and I'll do what I can to rectify things. I appreciate your being an honorable person and having the integrity to post what you have. With genuine regards, --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 21:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

525301 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-01 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.178055060E09 +++$+++ Hi there Arcadian. Is there any \"easy\" way to populate {{tl|Infobox Disease}}? I'd like to add on to [[aggressive NK-cell leukemia]], and maybe, if there is an easy way (something similar to Diberri's template filler, or a single website where one can find the relevant information to fill in the fields) it might be worth mentioning on [[WP:MEDMOS]], as we do for {{tl|Drugbox}}. Best,  +++$+++ Hi there Arcadian. Is there any "easy" way to populate {{tl|Infobox Disease}}? I'd like to add on to [[aggressive NK-cell leukemia]], and maybe, if there is an easy way (something similar to Diberri's template filler, or a single website where one can find the relevant information to fill in the fields) it might be worth mentioning on [[WP:MEDMOS]], as we do for {{tl|Drugbox}}. Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 14:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
525302 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525301 +++$+++ 525301 +++$+++ 2007-05-01 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.178061720E09 +++$+++ Response at [[User_talk:Diberri#Infobox_Disease]]. -- +++$+++ :Response at [[User_talk:Diberri#Infobox_Disease]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 16:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
525303 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525301 +++$+++ 525302 +++$+++ 2007-05-01 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.178069160E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Will watch over there.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. Will watch over there. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 18:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
525304 +++$+++ Diberri +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525301 +++$+++ 525302 +++$+++ 2007-05-16 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.179359820E09 +++$+++ Just received a suggestion from Malcolm at DD. Your comments welcome at [[User_talk:Diberri#Infobox_Disease]]. -- +++$+++ ::Just received a suggestion from Malcolm at DD. Your comments welcome at [[User_talk:Diberri#Infobox_Disease]]. --[[User:Diberri|David Iberri]] ([[User talk:Diberri|talk]]) 16:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

6082 +++$+++ Spidey104 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-05 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.299374880E09 +++$+++ Hey, can you weigh in on an edit war that is starting between myself and [[User:Brian Boru is awesome|Brian Boru]] on the [[Jane Foster (comics)]] article? I don't think I'm wrong here but I might be, so I want an outside opinion from someone who has a clearer head [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABrian_Boru_is_awesome&action=historysubmit&diff=417261691&oldid=417261622 than I do].  +++$+++ Hey, can you weigh in on an edit war that is starting between myself and [[User:Brian Boru is awesome|Brian Boru]] on the [[Jane Foster (comics)]] article? I don't think I'm wrong here but I might be, so I want an outside opinion from someone who has a clearer head [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABrian_Boru_is_awesome&action=historysubmit&diff=417261691&oldid=417261622 than I do]. [[User:Spidey104|<font color="blue">'''Spidey'''</font>]][[User talk:Spidey104#top|<font color="red">''104''</font>]] 17:28, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
6083 +++$+++ Spidey104 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6082 +++$+++ 6082 +++$+++ 2011-03-05 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.299378240E09 +++$+++ I saw your edits on the article. Thank you.  +++$+++ :I saw your edits on the article. Thank you. [[User:Spidey104|<font color="blue">'''Spidey'''</font>]][[User talk:Spidey104#top|<font color="red">''104''</font>]] 18:24, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

6084 +++$+++ Shearonink +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-13 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.300005120E09 +++$+++ Per [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Steven_Spielberg&curid=26940&diff=418532890&oldid=418509078 your revert], just thought you'd like to know that the vandal was [[User:94.11.150.66]] per [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Steven_Spielberg&diff=next&oldid=418295335 this edit].  I've warned them [[User talk:94.11.150.66|on their talkpage]].  +++$+++ Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Spielberg&curid=26940&diff=418532890&oldid=418509078 your revert], just thought you'd like to know that the vandal was [[User:94.11.150.66]] per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steven_Spielberg&diff=next&oldid=418295335 this edit].  I've warned them [[User talk:94.11.150.66|on their talkpage]]. [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 00:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
6085 +++$+++ Shearonink +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6084 +++$+++ 6084 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.300013460E09 +++$+++ PS - Btw, I forgot to mention that I did figure out it wasn't a rumor but was pretty much vandalism...the \"Dundee F.C.\" is the Dundee Football Club and the \"Harry MacLean\" is their Chief Executive.  +++$+++ :PS - Btw, I forgot to mention that I did figure out it wasn't a rumor but was pretty much vandalism...the "Dundee F.C." is the Dundee Football Club and the "Harry MacLean" is their Chief Executive. [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 02:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

530374 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-02 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.241256060E09 +++$+++ I noticed we have a lot of red links for individual NASCAR seasons  like (1955 - 1981 maybe).  I might be able to get a few of those started here this summer.  Do we want each race with top 10 finishes listed?  Also, that little career stat table I did for Richmond, Rex White, and AK - should I be looking to get that into all the other BIO and BLP articles over time? Hmmm... probably should have numbered these ... lol.  The one book I have the 2004 Fan Guide one (which will be a great help in refing the seasons) has money totals different than nascar.com.  I'm guessing it includes like memorabilia sales and such maybe. I'd be inclined to just leave those numbers out of anything, but what do you think? \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ I noticed we have a lot of red links for individual NASCAR seasons  like (1955 - 1981 maybe).  I might be able to get a few of those started here this summer.  Do we want each race with top 10 finishes listed?  Also, that little career stat table I did for Richmond, Rex White, and AK - should I be looking to get that into all the other BIO and BLP articles over time? Hmmm... probably should have numbered these ... lol.  The one book I have the 2004 Fan Guide one (which will be a great help in refing the seasons) has money totals different than nascar.com.  I'm guessing it includes like memorabilia sales and such maybe. I'd be inclined to just leave those numbers out of anything, but what do you think? — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 02:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
530375 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530374 +++$+++ 530374 +++$+++ 2009-05-02 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.241262120E09 +++$+++ For the NASCAR seasons, we have added the Top 10 finishers from each race, so your idea sounds good! That little career stat table looks good for any driver - add at will. I'd skip mentioning money since there is a dispute. The official NASCAR.com source would take precedent, but I see no reason to go there. We are concerned about the results, not money matters. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :For the NASCAR seasons, we have added the Top 10 finishers from each race, so your idea sounds good! That little career stat table looks good for any driver - add at will. I'd skip mentioning money since there is a dispute. The official NASCAR.com source would take precedent, but I see no reason to go there. We are concerned about the results, not money matters. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:02, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

268231 +++$+++ Webbbbbbber +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268231 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-14 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.208171940E09 +++$+++ I'm terribly sorry about inserting the placeholder image in the Settled insanity article.  It was entirely inadvertant, and I don't even know how I did it.  I'll be more careful in the future.   +++$+++ I'm terribly sorry about inserting the placeholder image in the Settled insanity article.  It was entirely inadvertant, and I don't even know how I did it.  I'll be more careful in the future.  [[User:Webbbbbbber|Webbbbbbber]] ([[User talk:Webbbbbbber|talk]]) 04:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
268232 +++$+++ Webbbbbbber +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268231 +++$+++ 268231 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.208172120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Webbbbbbber|Webbbbbbber]] ([[User talk:Webbbbbbber|talk]]) 04:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

6088 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6088 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-22 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.300850220E09 +++$+++ Just a request. Do you mind watching [[Ultimate Spider-Man (TV series)]] for me. There is sometimes uncited additions of cast and crew which can probably be made up. Thank you.  +++$+++ Just a request. Do you mind watching [[Ultimate Spider-Man (TV series)]] for me. There is sometimes uncited additions of cast and crew which can probably be made up. Thank you. [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 20:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
6089 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6088 +++$+++ 6088 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.300932180E09 +++$+++ Thank you. If you haven't noticed it's already happened. The only sourced cast seems to be J.K. Simmons as J. Jonah Jameson. And if there isn't any source for the cast (or crew) than I feel it shouldn't be on there. It is probably the same IP editor though that keeps adding it.  +++$+++ :Thank you. If you haven't noticed it's already happened. The only sourced cast seems to be J.K. Simmons as J. Jonah Jameson. And if there isn't any source for the cast (or crew) than I feel it shouldn't be on there. It is probably the same IP editor though that keeps adding it. [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 19:03, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

268233 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-13 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.208105640E09 +++$+++ Excellent news, Mattisse!  The 1992 edition of ''Road Guide to Hawai'i Volcanoes National Park'' is online [http:\/\/www.dartmouth.edu\/~volcano\/texts\/DekHawaii.html here].  It has a lot of content about [[Chain of Craters Road]]!  I own the 2007 edition so I can correct any outdated information.  +++$+++ Excellent news, Mattisse!  The 1992 edition of ''Road Guide to Hawai'i Volcanoes National Park'' is online [http://www.dartmouth.edu/~volcano/texts/DekHawaii.html here].  It has a lot of content about [[Chain of Craters Road]]!  I own the 2007 edition so I can correct any outdated information. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 09:54, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
268234 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268233 +++$+++ 268233 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.208105880E09 +++$+++ Ok, comparing the two editions shows there are major differences with numbers.  For example, in 1992, the road was 23 miles long, whereas now it is 20 miles (due to lava flows).  So be very careful about quoting old numbers.  But it's a good source to use for details about the road trip, the craters, and other sights along the way.  +++$+++ :Ok, comparing the two editions shows there are major differences with numbers.  For example, in 1992, the road was 23 miles long, whereas now it is 20 miles (due to lava flows).  So be very careful about quoting old numbers.  But it's a good source to use for details about the road trip, the craters, and other sights along the way. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 09:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
268235 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268233 +++$+++ 268234 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.208119500E09 +++$+++ Actually, don't worry about the numbers; I'll review them based on the 2007 ed. I own.  At least you now have a link to a lot of info about the road.  +++$+++ ::Actually, don't worry about the numbers; I'll review them based on the 2007 ed. I own.  At least you now have a link to a lot of info about the road. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 13:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
268236 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268233 +++$+++ 268234 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.208120400E09 +++$+++ In [[Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary]] there is a repeated sentence and refs.  The second and third paras each start with the same sentence. Which do you prefer?  &ndash; +++$+++ ::In [[Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary]] there is a repeated sentence and refs.  The second and third paras each start with the same sentence. Which do you prefer?  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
268237 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268233 +++$+++ 268236 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.208121120E09 +++$+++ I don't see it, but I trust your judgment.  In another matter, if you are able to access the 464 page document I added to the further reading section online, you will be greatly rewarded.  There's enough information in that report to keep you busy for the next decade. :)  +++$+++ :::I don't see it, but I trust your judgment.  In another matter, if you are able to access the 464 page document I added to the further reading section online, you will be greatly rewarded.  There's enough information in that report to keep you busy for the next decade. :) [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 14:12, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
268238 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268233 +++$+++ 268237 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.208127660E09 +++$+++ I submitted it for DYK and added a volcano pic to catch the eye of the DYK people. I changed the mile length at one point and gave a guess at the kilometers. What do you think?  &ndash; +++$+++ ::::I submitted it for DYK and added a volcano pic to catch the eye of the DYK people. I changed the mile length at one point and gave a guess at the kilometers. What do you think?  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
268239 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268233 +++$+++ 268238 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.208130660E09 +++$+++ I just heard that K\u012blauea \u22c5 volcano has been erupting for some days now, and 2000 visitors in the park were evacuated but have now returned. &ndash; +++$+++ :::::I just heard that Kīlauea ⋅ volcano has been erupting for some days now, and 2000 visitors in the park were evacuated but have now returned. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
268240 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268233 +++$+++ 268239 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.208189940E09 +++$+++ K\u012blauea has been erupting continuously for the last 25 years.  The most recent evacuations were caused by an increased emission of sulfur dioxide gas from  Halemaumau Crater and Puu Oo's vent.  Not entirely sure what a photo of K\u012blauea erupting in 1954 has to do with an article on the road.  The lead photo should be an image of the road.  +++$+++ ::::::Kīlauea has been erupting continuously for the last 25 years.  The most recent evacuations were caused by an increased emission of sulfur dioxide gas from  Halemaumau Crater and Puu Oo's vent.  Not entirely sure what a photo of Kīlauea erupting in 1954 has to do with an article on the road.  The lead photo should be an image of the road. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 09:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

530378 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-03 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.241337240E09 +++$+++ I'm going to nom it for a DYK, if you want to contrib. to the article.  Still needs some work, but I thought It might be good enough to roll out to mainspace.  If you have a second, would you at least look it over. ;) thx. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ I'm going to nom it for a DYK, if you want to contrib. to the article.  Still needs some work, but I thought It might be good enough to roll out to mainspace.  If you have a second, would you at least look it over. ;) thx. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 00:54, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
530379 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530378 +++$+++ 530378 +++$+++ 2009-05-03 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.241381820E09 +++$+++ You know it needs 1500 characters of main body text - that'll be hard to accomplish. You might be able to make a case for a sentence summary for each race. There needs to be wikilinks to each track on the schedule. I won't have time until at the earliest Sunday night U.S. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :You know it needs 1500 characters of main body text - that'll be hard to accomplish. You might be able to make a case for a sentence summary for each race. There needs to be wikilinks to each track on the schedule. I won't have time until at the earliest Sunday night U.S. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
530380 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530378 +++$+++ 530379 +++$+++ 2009-05-04 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.241428440E09 +++$+++ Looks like I might not have time to follow through on this one in time to get a DYK out of it.  Too bad, I thought that the \"first year that sponsors paid money\" would be a great hook too ... lol.  Anyway, having been accused of having caused a \"hell of a lot of damage\" to an article, I feel it's probably in my best interests to address that issue first.  If I do scrounge up enough time to get the text up to required standards, I'll let you know when I put it up for DYK.  Probably should have just left it in a text file til I had more time ... lol.  I'll get the individual top 10 for each race added as well, when time permits.  The good news is that there is a whole section in this one book which is literally titled \"Did You Know\".  Some good stuff in there too.  Cheers buddy. ;) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ::Looks like I might not have time to follow through on this one in time to get a DYK out of it.  Too bad, I thought that the "first year that sponsors paid money" would be a great hook too ... lol.  Anyway, having been accused of having caused a "hell of a lot of damage" to an article, I feel it's probably in my best interests to address that issue first.  If I do scrounge up enough time to get the text up to required standards, I'll let you know when I put it up for DYK.  Probably should have just left it in a text file til I had more time ... lol.  I'll get the individual top 10 for each race added as well, when time permits.  The good news is that there is a whole section in this one book which is literally titled "Did You Know".  Some good stuff in there too.  Cheers buddy. ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 02:14, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

6092 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-29 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.301402640E09 +++$+++ Hey Tenebrae, you may be interested in the recent edits.  +++$+++ Hey Tenebrae, you may be interested in the recent edits. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 05:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
6093 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6092 +++$+++ 6092 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.301440140E09 +++$+++ Nice work on the article.  +++$+++ *Nice work on the article. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:09, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

568994 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-23 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.161635880E09 +++$+++ The above IP editors have not been warned by anyone yet and have only made one edit each, which it hard to interpret as vandalism. Please warn the vandals with the appropriate tags before bringing them to [[WP:AIV]].  Tags can be found at [[Wikipedia:Template messages\/User talk namespace]]. Regards,  +++$+++ The above IP editors have not been warned by anyone yet and have only made one edit each, which it hard to interpret as vandalism. Please warn the vandals with the appropriate tags before bringing them to [[WP:AIV]].  Tags can be found at [[Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace]]. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 13:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
568995 +++$+++ IndianCow +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568994 +++$+++ 568994 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.161636060E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the information. But still I am not sure as to where I can warn these anonymous users... since they dont have a talk page.. Please advise.-- +++$+++ :Thank you for the information. But still I am not sure as to where I can warn these anonymous users... since they dont have a talk page.. Please advise.--[[User:IndianCow|IndianCow]] 13:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

530383 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-04 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.241427120E09 +++$+++ It was deleted off the English Wikipedia because it was moved to Commons. You can find the undeletion requests for Commons [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Commons:Undeletion_requests here]. You're right, things do look fishy. I'll think about it. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ It was deleted off the English Wikipedia because it was moved to Commons. You can find the undeletion requests for Commons [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests here]. You're right, things do look fishy. I'll think about it. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:52, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
530384 +++$+++ Freekee +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530383 +++$+++ 530383 +++$+++ 2009-05-04 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.241483040E09 +++$+++ I have an issue with this whole situation. The uploader uploaded quite a few images, and it is quite obvious to me that he took them himself, since he also has them on his Flickr. Unfortunately, he has a copyright notice on them there, and won't provide User:GRuban official proof that they're his. GRuban has gotten at least two of them deleted, purely on procedural grounds (the copyright issue). Are we obligated to delete all of his images because of the copyright\/proof issue? Or since we \"know\" they're legit, can we leave them alone? - +++$+++ :I have an issue with this whole situation. The uploader uploaded quite a few images, and it is quite obvious to me that he took them himself, since he also has them on his Flickr. Unfortunately, he has a copyright notice on them there, and won't provide User:GRuban official proof that they're his. GRuban has gotten at least two of them deleted, purely on procedural grounds (the copyright issue). Are we obligated to delete all of his images because of the copyright/proof issue? Or since we "know" they're legit, can we leave them alone? -[[User:Freekee|Freekee]] ([[User talk:Freekee|talk]]) 17:24, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
530385 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530383 +++$+++ 530384 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.241524680E09 +++$+++ It's up to you if you want to pursuit it. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::It's up to you if you want to pursuit it. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

268241 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268241 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-14 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.208204040E09 +++$+++ I wrote an article on [[pit crater]]s and plan to do one on Halemaumau Crater which is essentially a pit crater, from what I read. In mainland United States, the activity of the volcano is not covered, so it is not very real here. I only found out accidentally about the recent evacuation.  My reading this last week has been very enlightening.  &ndash; +++$+++ I wrote an article on [[pit crater]]s and plan to do one on Halemaumau Crater which is essentially a pit crater, from what I read. In mainland United States, the activity of the volcano is not covered, so it is not very real here. I only found out accidentally about the recent evacuation.  My reading this last week has been very enlightening.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
268242 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268241 +++$+++ 268241 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.208207640E09 +++$+++ Good work, and thanks for taking the time to explain about the photo.  I wasn't even aware of the DYK guidelines for pics!  +++$+++ :Good work, and thanks for taking the time to explain about the photo.  I wasn't even aware of the DYK guidelines for pics! [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 14:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

6098 +++$+++ David A +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-12 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.302642840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:David A|Dave]] ([[User talk:David A|talk]]) 14:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
6099 +++$+++ TheBalance +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6098 +++$+++ 6098 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.302664680E09 +++$+++ The Beyonder wasn't even from the Marvel universe in his original appearance.   +++$+++ :The Beyonder wasn't even from the Marvel universe in his original appearance.  [[User:TheBalance|TheBalance]] ([[User talk:TheBalance|talk]]) 20:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
6100 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6098 +++$+++ 6099 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.302664920E09 +++$+++ I promise you both, I'll try and help when I get a chance, probably tomorrow. -- +++$+++ ::I promise you both, I'll try and help when I get a chance, probably tomorrow. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 20:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
6101 +++$+++ TheBalance +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6098 +++$+++ 6100 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.302665640E09 +++$+++ Mentioned and later proven in conjunction with recreating the Marvel multiverse.  I'm still not convinced you have even read that story.   +++$+++ :::Mentioned and later proven in conjunction with recreating the Marvel multiverse.  I'm still not convinced you have even read that story.  [[User:TheBalance|TheBalance]] ([[User talk:TheBalance|talk]]) 20:34, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
6102 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6098 +++$+++ 6101 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.302751140E09 +++$+++ I think it's going to be another day before I can help. Just got his with a perfect storm of work and I'm treading water to keep up with deadlines. I apologize for the delay in doing what I promised, and I will indeed try to help. -- +++$+++ ::::I think it's going to be another day before I can help. Just got his with a perfect storm of work and I'm treading water to keep up with deadlines. I apologize for the delay in doing what I promised, and I will indeed try to help. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 20:19, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
6103 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6098 +++$+++ 6102 +++$+++ 2011-04-14 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.302843540E09 +++$+++ Guys, I've got to apologize again. It's feast or famine when you're a journalist, and for some reason I'm getting crushed with a lot of stuff all at once, most with short deadlines. It's looking like the weekend before I can help. If I might recommend J Greb, Doczilla or TriipleThreat as three wonderful editors, off the top of my head, if you need someone quicker than I can get to it. I feel badly since I like you guys and I do want to help. But for now my hands are tied ... oto the computer keyboard and my various editors.... I'm sorry. -- +++$+++ :::::Guys, I've got to apologize again. It's feast or famine when you're a journalist, and for some reason I'm getting crushed with a lot of stuff all at once, most with short deadlines. It's looking like the weekend before I can help. If I might recommend J Greb, Doczilla or TriipleThreat as three wonderful editors, off the top of my head, if you need someone quicker than I can get to it. I feel badly since I like you guys and I do want to help. But for now my hands are tied ... oto the computer keyboard and my various editors.... I'm sorry. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 21:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
6104 +++$+++ David A +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6098 +++$+++ 6103 +++$+++ 2011-04-16 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.302970140E09 +++$+++ It will take a little while until I get the time and opportunity to find the relevant scans, so no problem at all.  I will mention when I'm finished.  +++$+++ ::::::It will take a little while until I get the time and opportunity to find the relevant scans, so no problem at all.  I will mention when I'm finished. [[User:David A|Dave]] ([[User talk:David A|talk]]) 09:09, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

268243 +++$+++ JIP +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268243 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-14 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.208228520E09 +++$+++ Why do you have links to archives of talk pages that haven't actually been archived yet?  +++$+++ Why do you have links to archives of talk pages that haven't actually been archived yet? [[User:JIP|<font color="#CC0000">J</font><font color="#00CC00">I</font><font color="#0000CC">P</font>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]] 20:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
268244 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268243 +++$+++ 268243 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.208234040E09 +++$+++ Because I am very unorganized and not good at technical details so I am trying to do things in advance.  Each time I do something like create archives I have to remember how to do it (not easy for me). So I have a bunch of archives created in advance. I want MiszaBotIII to always have an archive to put things in. I didn't think about the fact that it might be confusing to others. Is that the problem?  &ndash; +++$+++ :Because I am very unorganized and not good at technical details so I am trying to do things in advance.  Each time I do something like create archives I have to remember how to do it (not easy for me). So I have a bunch of archives created in advance. I want MiszaBotIII to always have an archive to put things in. I didn't think about the fact that it might be confusing to others. Is that the problem?  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:34, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
268245 +++$+++ JIP +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268243 +++$+++ 268244 +++$+++ 2008-04-15 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.208261700E09 +++$+++ There's no problem, I was just curious.  +++$+++ ::There's no problem, I was just curious. [[User:JIP|<font color="#CC0000">J</font><font color="#00CC00">I</font><font color="#0000CC">P</font>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]] 05:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
268246 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268243 +++$+++ 268243 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.208242020E09 +++$+++ I can't answer on your page because I do not have an account on the Portuguese wikipedia. I think the difference is that forensic psychology is more applied psychology and legal psychology sounds more research and academically oriented. I only know about legal psychology from the article here at Wikipedia. I did not know that there was a formal field called legal psychology before. It appears from reading the legal psychology articles that there is a lot of overlap, but that legal psychologist do more research and teaching than normally a forensic psychologist does. This is just my opinion.  Regards,  &ndash; +++$+++ :I can't answer on your page because I do not have an account on the Portuguese wikipedia. I think the difference is that forensic psychology is more applied psychology and legal psychology sounds more research and academically oriented. I only know about legal psychology from the article here at Wikipedia. I did not know that there was a formal field called legal psychology before. It appears from reading the legal psychology articles that there is a lot of overlap, but that legal psychologist do more research and teaching than normally a forensic psychologist does. This is just my opinion.  Regards,  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

530389 +++$+++ Fullrabb +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I understand your arguement. Wikipedia isn't a business directory, but why am I interested in FSBO Madison when I've never been to Madison or met any of the owners? Two reasons: First, the company is the first (and as far as we know the largest) internet response to the traditional realtor cartel that has dominated residential real estate sales for decades. They are fundamentally challenging the traditional model much as eBay, craigslist, and Wikipedia have each challenged an existing business structure. Second, how many Madison real estate companies have been the subject of two New York Times articles, much less a major economics research paper that was analyzed on numerous reports and blogs like Freakonomics. I would be happy to rewrite the intro to the article to emphasize more of this significance, but I want to be sure that will suffice, because of your comment, \"I can't put my finger on anything specific.\" Your thoughts?  +++$+++ I understand your arguement. Wikipedia isn't a business directory, but why am I interested in FSBO Madison when I've never been to Madison or met any of the owners? Two reasons: First, the company is the first (and as far as we know the largest) internet response to the traditional realtor cartel that has dominated residential real estate sales for decades. They are fundamentally challenging the traditional model much as eBay, craigslist, and Wikipedia have each challenged an existing business structure. Second, how many Madison real estate companies have been the subject of two New York Times articles, much less a major economics research paper that was analyzed on numerous reports and blogs like Freakonomics. I would be happy to rewrite the intro to the article to emphasize more of this significance, but I want to be sure that will suffice, because of your comment, "I can't put my finger on anything specific." Your thoughts? [[User:Fullrabb|Fullrabb]] 5 May 2009 (UTC)
530390 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530389 +++$+++ 530389 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.241689500E09 +++$+++ I am definitely not accusing you of doing promotional work. I've run across that situation myself where I others thought I was promoting something. You are understanding my concern: why does some random realtor in Madison deserve an article? Your suggestion to improve the article's intro to include this information is a step in the right direction to address my concerns, especially if you can source this content to the New York Times (a reliable source). Please edit the intro and leave me a message. I'll try to help edit the article if I feel I can improve it. Cheers! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I am definitely not accusing you of doing promotional work. I've run across that situation myself where I others thought I was promoting something. You are understanding my concern: why does some random realtor in Madison deserve an article? Your suggestion to improve the article's intro to include this information is a step in the right direction to address my concerns, especially if you can source this content to the New York Times (a reliable source). Please edit the intro and leave me a message. I'll try to help edit the article if I feel I can improve it. Cheers! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

525305 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-03 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.178180700E09 +++$+++ Hi there, sorry to bother you again, but could you merge [[Uridine diphosphate glucuronic acid]] and [[UDP glucuronic acid]]? They are the same compound :)  +++$+++ Hi there, sorry to bother you again, but could you merge [[Uridine diphosphate glucuronic acid]] and [[UDP glucuronic acid]]? They are the same compound :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 01:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
525306 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525305 +++$+++ 525305 +++$+++ 2007-05-03 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.178180880E09 +++$+++ Fixed. Sorry for the error. -- +++$+++ :Fixed. Sorry for the error. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
525307 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525305 +++$+++ 525306 +++$+++ 2007-05-03 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.178181000E09 +++$+++ No problem. I hope you don't think I'm stalking your contributions.  +++$+++ ::No problem. I hope you don't think I'm stalking your contributions. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 01:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
525308 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525305 +++$+++ 525307 +++$+++ 2007-05-03 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.178181180E09 +++$+++ Not at all. The diagrams you add to my molecule pages are extremely helpful and absurdly prompt, so stalk to your heart's content. :) -- +++$+++ :::Not at all. The diagrams you add to my molecule pages are extremely helpful and absurdly prompt, so stalk to your heart's content. :) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

530392 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530392 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-05 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.241540280E09 +++$+++ I added [[1952 in NASCAR]] to DYK - May 2.  If you want to check to see if I did it right, or if there's anything I can do to help the article along, let me know.  I still have a lot of individual races to add - but I doubt I can get much further before I leave.  Have a good one. ;) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ I added [[1952 in NASCAR]] to DYK - May 2.  If you want to check to see if I did it right, or if there's anything I can do to help the article along, let me know.  I still have a lot of individual races to add - but I doubt I can get much further before I leave.  Have a good one. ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 09:18, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
530393 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530392 +++$+++ 530392 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.241540340E09 +++$+++ note: If I can get to the Internet in any way while Jamie's RfA is open, I will gladly add my support. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :note: If I can get to the Internet in any way while Jamie's RfA is open, I will gladly add my support. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 09:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

530394 +++$+++ BrownHairedGirl +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530394 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-08 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.241806620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your msg on my talk about [[Percy Hurd]] appearing on the main page through [[WP:DYK]]. Now I'm probably missing something, but the http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&target=Percy_Hurd whatlinkshere] doesn't show it, and I can't find any trace of him on the DYK pages. I know that I nominated the article, but did it actually make it to DYK? -- +++$+++ Thanks for your msg on my talk about [[Percy Hurd]] appearing on the main page through [[WP:DYK]]. Now I'm probably missing something, but the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&target=Percy_Hurd whatlinkshere] doesn't show it, and I can't find any trace of him on the DYK pages. I know that I nominated the article, but did it actually make it to DYK? --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#996600; cursor: not-allowed;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 11:17, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
530395 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530394 +++$+++ 530394 +++$+++ 2009-05-08 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.241808000E09 +++$+++ It's already off the main page and removed from the queues, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know&oldid=288608486 here] is where it was added by BQ. I just did the crediting because BQ was busy. You can find a record in the [[Wikipedia:Recent additions|archives]]. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :It's already off the main page and removed from the queues, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know&oldid=288608486 here] is where it was added by BQ. I just did the crediting because BQ was busy. You can find a record in the [[Wikipedia:Recent additions|archives]]. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 11:40, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
530396 +++$+++ BrownHairedGirl +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530394 +++$+++ 530395 +++$+++ 2009-05-09 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.241937960E09 +++$+++ Anyway, congrats on all your good work with DYK. :) -- +++$+++ ::Anyway, congrats on all your good work with DYK. :) --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#996600; cursor: not-allowed;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 23:46, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
530397 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530394 +++$+++ 530396 +++$+++ 2009-05-09 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.241938440E09 +++$+++ No problems about your questions - they were quite reasonable! I didn't consider them to be a nuisance at all. Thank you for all that you do too! Like I saw on someone's userpage - \"you give a damn\". We all do or we'd be doing something else. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::No problems about your questions - they were quite reasonable! I didn't consider them to be a nuisance at all. Thank you for all that you do too! Like I saw on someone's userpage - "you give a damn". We all do or we'd be doing something else. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

6107 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6107 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-18 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.303138440E09 +++$+++ Hey, buddy. Which of the two photos at the top of [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Category:4.14.11_%E2%80%9CMeet_the_Publishers%E2%80%9D_Q%26A this Commons page] do you think make a better Infobox portrait of [[C.B. Cebulski]], the fifth one (which was taken with no flash) or the sixth one (which was taken with one)? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hey, buddy. Which of the two photos at the top of [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:4.14.11_%E2%80%9CMeet_the_Publishers%E2%80%9D_Q%26A this Commons page] do you think make a better Infobox portrait of [[C.B. Cebulski]], the fifth one (which was taken with no flash) or the sixth one (which was taken with one)? Thanks. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 07:54, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
6108 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6107 +++$+++ 6107 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.303165620E09 +++$+++ The one ''without'' the flash, which I believe is the one you said I could touch up, is [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:4.14.11CBCebulskiByLuigiNovi1.jpg this one]. But how do I lighten it without completely washing it out and yellowing it? Which tool in Photoshop should I use? Can you describe the procedure, and show me what it might look like? Thanks again!  +++$+++ :The one ''without'' the flash, which I believe is the one you said I could touch up, is [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:4.14.11CBCebulskiByLuigiNovi1.jpg this one]. But how do I lighten it without completely washing it out and yellowing it? Which tool in Photoshop should I use? Can you describe the procedure, and show me what it might look like? Thanks again! [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 15:27, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
6109 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6107 +++$+++ 6108 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.303168500E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'm familiar with that tool, but I don't like the reduction in contrast that using it causes. Thanks anyway. :-)  +++$+++ ::Thanks, I'm familiar with that tool, but I don't like the reduction in contrast that using it causes. Thanks anyway. :-) [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 16:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

268252 +++$+++ Merkinsmum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268252 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-30 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.209622680E09 +++$+++ Mattisse hun, you haven't been on wiki for a couple of weeks.  Are you ok?  +++$+++ Mattisse hun, you haven't been on wiki for a couple of weeks.  Are you ok? [[User:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="#FF1493">Merkin's]]</font></b>  [[User talk:Merkinsmum|<b><font color="#FF1493">mum]]</font></b> 23:18, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
268253 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268252 +++$+++ 268252 +++$+++ 2008-05-05 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.210026120E09 +++$+++ I have not been having a good experience on Wikipedia and have been losing interest. Sincerely, &ndash; +++$+++ :I have not been having a good experience on Wikipedia and have been losing interest. Sincerely, &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

6110 +++$+++ Crohnie +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6110 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-19 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.303234500E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just want to advice you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:MuZemike#Sock of a discussion going on where I dropped your name].  Thanks, -- +++$+++ Hi, I just want to advice you [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MuZemike#Sock of a discussion going on where I dropped your name].  Thanks, --[[User:Crohnie|<span style="color:Indigo">'''Crohnie'''</span><span style="color:deeppink">'''Gal'''</span>]][[User talk:Crohnie|<span style="color:deepskyblue"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 10:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
6111 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6110 +++$+++ 6110 +++$+++ 2011-04-21 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.303443840E09 +++$+++ No question DeadSend4 is a sock of Jane His Wife. But where's the evidence that Jane His Wife is a sock of Its Lassie Time? \u2190 +++$+++ :No question DeadSend4 is a sock of Jane His Wife. But where's the evidence that Jane His Wife is a sock of Its Lassie Time? ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 20:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
6112 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6110 +++$+++ 6111 +++$+++ 2011-04-21 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.303444380E09 +++$+++ Jane his wife is listed at [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of ItsLassieTime]] -- +++$+++ ::Jane his wife is listed at [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of ItsLassieTime]] --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 20:53, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
6113 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6110 +++$+++ 6112 +++$+++ 2011-04-21 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.303444740E09 +++$+++ That's because I put the banner there on the strength of your assertion! And I have just removed it, to avoid \"circular reasoning\". It would be good if you could provide a case with a few diffs that convinced you that Jane = ILT. (Maybe you already have, I just don't know where.) \u2190 +++$+++ :::That's because I put the banner there on the strength of your assertion! And I have just removed it, to avoid "circular reasoning". It would be good if you could provide a case with a few diffs that convinced you that Jane = ILT. (Maybe you already have, I just don't know where.) ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 20:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
6114 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6110 +++$+++ 6113 +++$+++ 2011-04-21 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.303444800E09 +++$+++ Sorry &mdash; I hadn't checked the history of that category page. I'll track it down. If I'd had known he\/she would be back, I'd have kept careful records! :) &nbsp;-- +++$+++ ::::Sorry &mdash; I hadn't checked the history of that category page. I'll track it down. If I'd had known he/she would be back, I'd have kept careful records! :) &nbsp;--[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 21:00, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
6115 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6110 +++$+++ 6114 +++$+++ 2011-04-21 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.303445040E09 +++$+++ I think the best thing at this point would be for you to add Jane to the current ILT SPI and provide some example behaviorial evidence. \u2190 +++$+++ :::::I think the best thing at this point would be for you to add Jane to the current ILT SPI and provide some example behaviorial evidence. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 21:04, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
6116 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6110 +++$+++ 6115 +++$+++ 2011-04-21 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.303445100E09 +++$+++ Good idea. Wow, this has become a lot of work. Ah, well &nbsp; it's for the greater good. -- +++$+++ ::::::Good idea. Wow, this has become a lot of work. Ah, well &nbsp; it's for the greater good. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 21:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

530401 +++$+++ Gordonrox24 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-10 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.241992800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for updating Mark Martin's article. Just a question. Do you watch the race with Wikipedia on? You updated his tally before nascar.com could even update their website! Great work!-- +++$+++ Thanks for updating Mark Martin's article. Just a question. Do you watch the race with Wikipedia on? You updated his tally before nascar.com could even update their website! Great work!--[[User:Gordonrox24|gordonrox24]] ([[User talk:Gordonrox24|talk]]) 15:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
530402 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530401 +++$+++ 530401 +++$+++ 2009-05-11 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.242029100E09 +++$+++ I only watch some NASCAR races. I happened to be sitting at my computer watching the race. If I don't have plans, I usually go to a local racetrack on Saturday nights, but they rained out. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I only watch some NASCAR races. I happened to be sitting at my computer watching the race. If I don't have plans, I usually go to a local racetrack on Saturday nights, but they rained out. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:05, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

268258 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-08 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.210259820E09 +++$+++ I look forward to seeing more of you around here.  I'm working on three DYK's right now, so let me know if you want in! :)  +++$+++ I look forward to seeing more of you around here.  I'm working on three DYK's right now, so let me know if you want in! :) [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 08:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
268259 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268258 +++$+++ 268258 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.210269900E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure if you are aware of it or not, but your contributions have been recognized [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Hawaii\/Outreach\/Newsletter\/May_2008|here]].  +++$+++ :I'm not sure if you are aware of it or not, but your contributions have been recognized [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Hawaii/Outreach/Newsletter/May_2008|here]]. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 11:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

530403 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530403 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-10 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.241984160E09 +++$+++ It has been many months of manually updating the DYK template for the main page (since mid February). We really do need this bot. I'm sure your busy. After all, we are all volunteers and this is a hobby. I want to start a thread on the DYK talk page asking if someone else will do the programming and bug repairing for the bot; Shubinator will probably be willing to do it. I'm being polite and telling you about it so you have time to respond before I start a thread. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ It has been many months of manually updating the DYK template for the main page (since mid February). We really do need this bot. I'm sure your busy. After all, we are all volunteers and this is a hobby. I want to start a thread on the DYK talk page asking if someone else will do the programming and bug repairing for the bot; Shubinator will probably be willing to do it. I'm being polite and telling you about it so you have time to respond before I start a thread. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:36, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
530404 +++$+++ nixeagle +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530403 +++$+++ 530403 +++$+++ 2009-05-11 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.242028260E09 +++$+++ If someone else wishes to do so, they may. I've attempted several times to test out the problem only to have the main page manually updated while I was testing. I've just assumed that you guys would rather manually update :P. I can make an attempt after Friday this week (finals) if you would like or we can let someone else try. The main issue as far as me is getting everyone at DYK to '''not''' update the main page, which they invariably do anyway because every time ''one'' person misses the message. >.> If you guys don't mind waiting to friday I can probably do a better job of testing by creating a bunch of test pages and fix the thing off the main page, as getting people to wait is just impossible. \u2014\u2014 ''' +++$+++ :If someone else wishes to do so, they may. I've attempted several times to test out the problem only to have the main page manually updated while I was testing. I've just assumed that you guys would rather manually update :P. I can make an attempt after Friday this week (finals) if you would like or we can let someone else try. The main issue as far as me is getting everyone at DYK to '''not''' update the main page, which they invariably do anyway because every time ''one'' person misses the message. >.> If you guys don't mind waiting to friday I can probably do a better job of testing by creating a bunch of test pages and fix the thing off the main page, as getting people to wait is just impossible. —— '''[[User:Nixeagle|<font color="navy">nix</font>]][[User talk:Nixeagle|<font color="red">eagle]]</font><sup><small>[[Special:EmailUser/Nixeagle|<font color="green">email me</font>]]</small></sup>''' 00:51, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
530405 +++$+++ nixeagle +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530403 +++$+++ 530404 +++$+++ 2009-05-11 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.242029220E09 +++$+++ I've went ahead and made a post to WT:DYK. I can <s>enable<\/s>test it tonight pending all the bot variables being up to date as I remember resolving the main issue (logging out randomly). \u2014\u2014 ''' +++$+++ ::I've went ahead and made a post to WT:DYK. I can <s>enable</s>test it tonight pending all the bot variables being up to date as I remember resolving the main issue (logging out randomly). —— '''[[User:Nixeagle|<font color="navy">nix</font>]][[User talk:Nixeagle|<font color="red">eagle]]</font><sup><small>[[Special:EmailUser/Nixeagle|<font color="green">email me</font>]]</small></sup>''' 01:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

268260 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-07 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.210150440E09 +++$+++ In the '''2 days''' since you have been back from your several week hiatus ''(in which I harmoniously edited - with 0 problems with other editors)'', you have made obvious veiled references to me as being a '''\"POV pusher\"''', '''\"aggressive\"''', '''\"amoral\"''', and '''\"abusive\"'''. You have made obvious but 'cleverly' veiled references to me not only on 2 editors talk pages [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Coppertwig#Objection 1] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Iantresman 2], but also the Wikipedia Administrators' notice board [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#User:Iantresman 3]. All of these have been unprovoked, as I have not had any contact with you in weeks - as I had ''(naively I guess)'', believed that you were finally willing to go about your way and edit without constantly making unfounded and merit-less attacks against me --- as you did during the several weeks where you made it a hobby to harass me, my talk page, and any article I was working on a daily\/hourly basis. For the 20 + time, '''please desist from constantly attacking me for no reason''' - and please use the talents I know you possess to be a productive wikipedia editor. I will be logging all of your attacks against me this time, and hope that it will not be necessary to seek administrative action. Thank you. &nbsp;&nbsp;[[Image:Smile icon.png|14px]]&nbsp; +++$+++ In the '''2 days''' since you have been back from your several week hiatus ''(in which I harmoniously edited - with 0 problems with other editors)'', you have made obvious veiled references to me as being a '''"POV pusher"''', '''"aggressive"''', '''"amoral"''', and '''"abusive"'''. You have made obvious but 'cleverly' veiled references to me not only on 2 editors talk pages [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Coppertwig#Objection 1] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Iantresman 2], but also the Wikipedia Administrators' notice board [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#User:Iantresman 3]. All of these have been unprovoked, as I have not had any contact with you in weeks - as I had ''(naively I guess)'', believed that you were finally willing to go about your way and edit without constantly making unfounded and merit-less attacks against me --- as you did during the several weeks where you made it a hobby to harass me, my talk page, and any article I was working on a daily/hourly basis. For the 20 + time, '''please desist from constantly attacking me for no reason''' - and please use the talents I know you possess to be a productive wikipedia editor. I will be logging all of your attacks against me this time, and hope that it will not be necessary to seek administrative action. Thank you. &nbsp;&nbsp;[[Image:Smile icon.png|14px]]&nbsp;[[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] Redthoreau 01:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
268261 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268260 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.210243380E09 +++$+++ &nbsp;&nbsp;[[Image:Smile icon.png|14px]]&nbsp; +++$+++ :::&nbsp;&nbsp;[[Image:Smile icon.png|14px]]&nbsp;[[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] Redthoreau 03:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
268262 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268260 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.210303380E09 +++$+++ '''Mattisse''', What language do I need to convert this to? How may more ways do I need to express my desire to have you '''\"leave me alone\"''' and remove my name from your \"vocabulary\/lexicon\". Pretend I don't exist and desist from this obsession that you have with me, and every edit I make. I am astounded that you have taken it upon yourself to distribute your skewed interpretations on the reality of this situation all around Wikipedia ... it is not a case where the kid who yells the loudest is right. I want to be done with you, I want to never have to address you again ''(as was the case the several weeks when you were on vacation and thus were not harassing me)'', but you constantly on a daily basis create situations where I am justified in responding to your allegations against me. '''JUST STOP !''' it is very simple. If you never attack me, I will never have to respond to you ... how hard is that to understand. If you notice ... I only ''\"respond\"'' to your attacks\/allegations\/ and attempts to \"game the system\" against me. I am in a reaction-type role. I have no desire to continue this feud or fuel this odd obsession of yours that goes back months with me. Let it go ... please ... edit your numerous articles and be a contributor to Wikipedia ... and pretend our paths never crossed. Since there is no '''\"block\"''' option ... I am unsure of how to deal with you further ... and perplexed of how to proceed with an individual who interprets every action out of its appropriate context and has such a glaringly different interpretation on every event than the observable reality. '''When you attack me ... and I ask you to stop ... = that is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Coppertwig&diff=prev&oldid=211091399 not an attack] or harassment.''' When you make unfair allegations against me publicly and I defend myself or refer to them as baseless = that is not an attack or harassment against you. '''----> Several editors have emailed me and told me that they have had previous run ins with you just like mine''', and apparently you have built yourself up a reputation ''(making it easy to see why you are now trying to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Blnguyen&diff=prev&oldid=210176784 '''\"Change\"''' your name] because of the backlash from your behavior)'' but under your facade of a difficult person to deal with - I know there is an intelligent, and talented wikipedic editor - who for some reason just can't let things go sometimes ... and spirals into this wikipedia tirade where when you feel \"scorned\" - you seek [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship\/Coppertwig&diff=prev&oldid=211095582 out] every forum\/admin imaginable to cast aspersions against me\/others - which in reality are just my requests for you to STOP attacking me or selectively disputing my edits as you have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image_talk:CGproducts2.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=211041414 here]. Please ... move on ... for the better of both of us. &nbsp;&nbsp;[[Image:Smile icon.png|14px]]&nbsp; +++$+++ ::::: '''Mattisse''', What language do I need to convert this to? How may more ways do I need to express my desire to have you '''"leave me alone"''' and remove my name from your "vocabulary/lexicon". Pretend I don't exist and desist from this obsession that you have with me, and every edit I make. I am astounded that you have taken it upon yourself to distribute your skewed interpretations on the reality of this situation all around Wikipedia ... it is not a case where the kid who yells the loudest is right. I want to be done with you, I want to never have to address you again ''(as was the case the several weeks when you were on vacation and thus were not harassing me)'', but you constantly on a daily basis create situations where I am justified in responding to your allegations against me. '''JUST STOP !''' it is very simple. If you never attack me, I will never have to respond to you ... how hard is that to understand. If you notice ... I only ''"respond"'' to your attacks/allegations/ and attempts to "game the system" against me. I am in a reaction-type role. I have no desire to continue this feud or fuel this odd obsession of yours that goes back months with me. Let it go ... please ... edit your numerous articles and be a contributor to Wikipedia ... and pretend our paths never crossed. Since there is no '''"block"''' option ... I am unsure of how to deal with you further ... and perplexed of how to proceed with an individual who interprets every action out of its appropriate context and has such a glaringly different interpretation on every event than the observable reality. '''When you attack me ... and I ask you to stop ... = that is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Coppertwig&diff=prev&oldid=211091399 not an attack] or harassment.''' When you make unfair allegations against me publicly and I defend myself or refer to them as baseless = that is not an attack or harassment against you. '''----> Several editors have emailed me and told me that they have had previous run ins with you just like mine''', and apparently you have built yourself up a reputation ''(making it easy to see why you are now trying to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blnguyen&diff=prev&oldid=210176784 '''"Change"''' your name] because of the backlash from your behavior)'' but under your facade of a difficult person to deal with - I know there is an intelligent, and talented wikipedic editor - who for some reason just can't let things go sometimes ... and spirals into this wikipedia tirade where when you feel "scorned" - you seek [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Coppertwig&diff=prev&oldid=211095582 out] every forum/admin imaginable to cast aspersions against me/others - which in reality are just my requests for you to STOP attacking me or selectively disputing my edits as you have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image_talk:CGproducts2.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=211041414 here]. Please ... move on ... for the better of both of us. &nbsp;&nbsp;[[Image:Smile icon.png|14px]]&nbsp;[[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] Redthoreau 20:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

6117 +++$+++ Eagles247 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-22 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.303464600E09 +++$+++ I think you have your facts mixed up. [[User:DeadSend4]] is the main account and was created in 2007. DeadSend4 created [[User:Jane his wife]] in late 2010. Jane his wife was blocked indefinitely only after the discovery that it was a sock of DeadSend4. DeadSend4's main account was also blocked, but for a shorter time period for socking. DeadSend4 is not currently evading a [[WP:BAN|ban]], nor is he technically evading a [[WP:BLOCK|block]]. He served his time for socking already, and he won't be blocked again because of that other account. Since it has already been determined via CheckUser, and the open admittance by DeadSend4, that Jane his wife was his sock, the SPI makes no sense. ''' +++$+++ I think you have your facts mixed up. [[User:DeadSend4]] is the main account and was created in 2007. DeadSend4 created [[User:Jane his wife]] in late 2010. Jane his wife was blocked indefinitely only after the discovery that it was a sock of DeadSend4. DeadSend4's main account was also blocked, but for a shorter time period for socking. DeadSend4 is not currently evading a [[WP:BAN|ban]], nor is he technically evading a [[WP:BLOCK|block]]. He served his time for socking already, and he won't be blocked again because of that other account. Since it has already been determined via CheckUser, and the open admittance by DeadSend4, that Jane his wife was his sock, the SPI makes no sense. '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 02:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
6118 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6117 +++$+++ 6117 +++$+++ 2011-04-22 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.303465680E09 +++$+++ Have checkusers confirmed the lack of any connection to ItsLassieTime? \u2190 +++$+++ :Have checkusers confirmed the lack of any connection to ItsLassieTime? ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 02:48, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
6119 +++$+++ Eagles247 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6117 +++$+++ 6118 +++$+++ 2011-04-22 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.303466040E09 +++$+++ See the SPI Tenebrae started: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations\/DeadSend4]]. (And FWIW, I don't think DeadSend4 is Lassie) ''' +++$+++ ::See the SPI Tenebrae started: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DeadSend4]]. (And FWIW, I don't think DeadSend4 is Lassie) '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 02:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
6120 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6117 +++$+++ 6119 +++$+++ 2011-04-22 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.303467240E09 +++$+++ I'm inclined to agree at this point. \u2190 +++$+++ :::I'm inclined to agree at this point. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 03:14, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

268263 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-08 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.210307760E09 +++$+++ {{quotation|Following the contribution history of a user and posting to articles they've edited can be appropriate at times, but is '''[[Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikistalking|inappropriate]] if the purpose is to punish or annoy the user.''' Since other people can't always tell what one's intentions are, one needs to be careful if following someone's contrib history because it might look as if one's purpose is to annoy. --Coppertwig (talk) 12:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)}} You are going to leave me with no other choice than to seek administrative action if you continue. '''This is my last warning''' to you, before I file a complaint of harassment. &nbsp;&nbsp;[[Image:Smile icon.png|14px]]&nbsp; +++$+++ {{quotation|Following the contribution history of a user and posting to articles they've edited can be appropriate at times, but is '''[[Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikistalking|inappropriate]] if the purpose is to punish or annoy the user.''' Since other people can't always tell what one's intentions are, one needs to be careful if following someone's contrib history because it might look as if one's purpose is to annoy. --Coppertwig (talk) 12:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)}} You are going to leave me with no other choice than to seek administrative action if you continue. '''This is my last warning''' to you, before I file a complaint of harassment. &nbsp;&nbsp;[[Image:Smile icon.png|14px]]&nbsp;[[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] Redthoreau 21:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
268264 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268263 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.210314300E09 +++$+++ I will not allow you to slander me in public any longer as you have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship\/Coppertwig&diff=prev&oldid=211141858 Here]. ''(Polaris never stated that I was the reason he quit, for all I know you most likely were - as you were for Sandygeorgia.)'' Every lie you post in public about me will be deleted by me ... until I am banned forever. You are an insult to Wikipedia without any integrity. I am ashamed that such a wonderful website like Wikipedia allows someone such as yourself to post here. &nbsp;&nbsp;[[Image:Smile icon.png|14px]]&nbsp; +++$+++ ::I will not allow you to slander me in public any longer as you have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Coppertwig&diff=prev&oldid=211141858 Here]. ''(Polaris never stated that I was the reason he quit, for all I know you most likely were - as you were for Sandygeorgia.)'' Every lie you post in public about me will be deleted by me ... until I am banned forever. You are an insult to Wikipedia without any integrity. I am ashamed that such a wonderful website like Wikipedia allows someone such as yourself to post here. &nbsp;&nbsp;[[Image:Smile icon.png|14px]]&nbsp;[[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]] Redthoreau 23:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
268265 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268263 +++$+++ 268263 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.210235700E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I have thought about you often. I am glad that you know I am back, however  in whatever feeble state I am in, perhaps similar to you. I have been  in a hospital in Maui. Please communicate. Sincerely, &ndash; +++$+++ :Thank you. I have thought about you often. I am glad that you know I am back, however  in whatever feeble state I am in, perhaps similar to you. I have been  in a hospital in Maui. Please communicate. Sincerely, &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
268266 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268263 +++$+++ 268265 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.210294440E09 +++$+++ Get well soon! You know how important an editor and friend you are for me at wiki. +++$+++ ::Get well soon! You know how important an editor and friend you are for me at wiki.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 17:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
268267 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268263 +++$+++ 268265 +++$+++ 2008-05-09 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.210319700E09 +++$+++ Yes, get well soon!   +++$+++ ::Yes, get well soon!  [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 00:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
268268 +++$+++ Tiptoety +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268263 +++$+++ 268263 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.210308900E09 +++$+++ Coppertwigs' RfA is not the correct place to ask questions (if you can even call it a question) like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship\/Coppertwig&diff=prev&oldid=211095582 this]. While you may have not meant to do any harm by it, a better place to have gone would have been directly to Coppertwig's talk page, or dispute resolution of you did not get the results you wanted. Please understand that questions on a RfA should only deal with the candidates ability to handle situations related to administrative abilities and should not be a place to ask for advice. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Coppertwigs' RfA is not the correct place to ask questions (if you can even call it a question) like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Coppertwig&diff=prev&oldid=211095582 this]. While you may have not meant to do any harm by it, a better place to have gone would have been directly to Coppertwig's talk page, or dispute resolution of you did not get the results you wanted. Please understand that questions on a RfA should only deal with the candidates ability to handle situations related to administrative abilities and should not be a place to ask for advice. Cheers, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 21:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
268269 +++$+++ Tiptoety +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268263 +++$+++ 268268 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.210309620E09 +++$+++ Please understand that you did not offend my by any means, I was just simply informing you that an RfA is an inappropriate venue to ask the type of questions that you did. If Coppertwig has asked to to refrain from saying negative things about other users on his\/her talk then don't, you can always just take such issues to [[WP:WQA]]. Hope that helps, cheers,  +++$+++ ::Please understand that you did not offend my by any means, I was just simply informing you that an RfA is an inappropriate venue to ask the type of questions that you did. If Coppertwig has asked to to refrain from saying negative things about other users on his/her talk then don't, you can always just take such issues to [[WP:WQA]]. Hope that helps, cheers, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 22:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
268270 +++$+++ Tiptoety +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268263 +++$+++ 268263 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.210315380E09 +++$+++ The first course of action you need to take is bring it up with [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] oh his\/her talk page, if he\/she continues to remove a comment that you see appropriate to be on a RfA (remember comments on RfA's should only relate to the candidate and their potential as a administrator)  then bring it to [[WP:ANI]] for a wider community discussion. Cheers,  +++$+++ :The first course of action you need to take is bring it up with [[User:Redthoreau|Redthoreau]] oh his/her talk page, if he/she continues to remove a comment that you see appropriate to be on a RfA (remember comments on RfA's should only relate to the candidate and their potential as a administrator)  then bring it to [[WP:ANI]] for a wider community discussion. Cheers, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 23:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

530411 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-13 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.242215460E09 +++$+++ I want to let you know that your actions to protect upcoming DYK images at Commons are appreciated, at least by me. It saves the trouble  of downloading images, uploading them to EN, and protecting them here. -- +++$+++ I want to let you know that your actions to protect upcoming DYK images at Commons are appreciated, at least by me. It saves the trouble  of downloading images, uploading them to EN, and protecting them here. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 04:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
530412 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530411 +++$+++ 530411 +++$+++ 2009-05-13 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.242216180E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. It's fairly easy, especially compared to the whole download cycle. I know how difficult that is, for had to do it the manual way until I got the tools at Commons a month ago. By the way, I set up cascading protection for local DYK images. It takes several hours for a cascading protection to reach an image on the main page. So I set it up that any local image sitting in queues 1 to 6 gets protected by cascading protection from the page [[User:Ameliorate!\/DYKlock]]. While it takes several hours for the protection to be applied, hooks normally sit in queues 1 to 6 for around a day. By the time they hit the main page, they'll be protected. They'll remain protected because the main page template is also transcluded to DYKlock. The moral of the story is that a local image doesn't need to be protected anymore. You just need to add {{tl|m-protected}} or {{tl|C-uploaded}}. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. It's fairly easy, especially compared to the whole download cycle. I know how difficult that is, for had to do it the manual way until I got the tools at Commons a month ago. By the way, I set up cascading protection for local DYK images. It takes several hours for a cascading protection to reach an image on the main page. So I set it up that any local image sitting in queues 1 to 6 gets protected by cascading protection from the page [[User:Ameliorate!/DYKlock]]. While it takes several hours for the protection to be applied, hooks normally sit in queues 1 to 6 for around a day. By the time they hit the main page, they'll be protected. They'll remain protected because the main page template is also transcluded to DYKlock. The moral of the story is that a local image doesn't need to be protected anymore. You just need to add {{tl|m-protected}} or {{tl|C-uploaded}}. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

530413 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-14 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.242357480E09 +++$+++ Hey there Royalbroil, how's WP doing these days?  I noticed that you cleaned up and improved the 1952 article while I was gone, thank you.  Sorry I ran out of time on ya. ;).  I have an idea I want to run past you in the next day or two on format too.  Anyway, I'm a little backed up as far as my clients go - so I'll need to be catching up there, but for the most part - I'm back.  Did you get all the races in?, or do I need to follow up on that and get the last couple added yet?  Hope you've been catching some good action now that the season has started. (races).  Cheers, and talk to you soon. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ Hey there Royalbroil, how's WP doing these days?  I noticed that you cleaned up and improved the 1952 article while I was gone, thank you.  Sorry I ran out of time on ya. ;).  I have an idea I want to run past you in the next day or two on format too.  Anyway, I'm a little backed up as far as my clients go - so I'll need to be catching up there, but for the most part - I'm back.  Did you get all the races in?, or do I need to follow up on that and get the last couple added yet?  Hope you've been catching some good action now that the season has started. (races).  Cheers, and talk to you soon. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 20:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
530414 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530413 +++$+++ 530413 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.242374760E09 +++$+++ Yea, the article is done - all of the races are added. I've been to lots of local tracks already - 11 so far (5 were ice races). Definitely catch up on your clients - that's a much bigger priority than the 'pedia. Talk to ya later! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Yea, the article is done - all of the races are added. I've been to lots of local tracks already - 11 so far (5 were ice races). Definitely catch up on your clients - that's a much bigger priority than the 'pedia. Talk to ya later! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

6126 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-01 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.304249940E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of \"file\" pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 04:39, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
6127 +++$+++ Spshu +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6126 +++$+++ 6126 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.304385120E09 +++$+++ If you bother to read my edit there is a place for it in [[Marvel Entertainment]]'s, the parent corporation's, article where it already existed. It has to do with the movies not the comics.  +++$+++ :If you bother to read my edit there is a place for it in [[Marvel Entertainment]]'s, the parent corporation's, article where it already existed. It has to do with the movies not the comics. [[User:Spshu|Spshu]] ([[User talk:Spshu|talk]]) 18:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
6128 +++$+++ Spshu +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6126 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.304571540E09 +++$+++ I just state the fact of where this is cover (granted my edit summary wasn't really good) and you don't assume good faith and post the above message on my talk page in response.  Man, wait until some one is really uncivil to you.  They get really nasty and gang up on you to get you to leave.  +++$+++ :::I just state the fact of where this is cover (granted my edit summary wasn't really good) and you don't assume good faith and post the above message on my talk page in response.  Man, wait until some one is really uncivil to you.  They get really nasty and gang up on you to get you to leave. [[User:Spshu|Spshu]] ([[User talk:Spshu|talk]]) 21:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

525309 +++$+++ Felgerkarb +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525309 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-07 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.178588100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Felgerkarb|Felgerkarb]] 18:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
525310 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525309 +++$+++ 525309 +++$+++ 2007-05-07 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.178597640E09 +++$+++ I'm pleased to make your aquaintance, and I thank you for your contributions to that article from October of last year. To answer your questions: on the anatomy pages, per [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(medicine-related_articles)#Naming_conventions]], the [[Terminologia Anatomica]] (\"TA\") is preferred for anatomy articles wherever possible, and TA currently uses that four division system (at least according to Dorlands -- for example, see [http:\/\/www.mercksource.com\/pp\/us\/cns\/cns_hl_dorlands.jspzQzpgzEzzSzppdocszSzuszSzcommonzSzdorlandszSzdorlandzSzdmd_p_07zPzhtm#12616500 here], and the corresponding links for the other branches.) The current TA also aligns with the terminology from the 1917 edition of [[Gray's Anatomy]] (\"In considering the course and relations of this vessel it may be divided into four portions: cervical, petrous, cavernous, and cerebral\", as shown [http:\/\/education.yahoo.com\/reference\/gray\/subjects\/subject?id=146#p566 here].) Of course, the TA, being an international standard updated infrequently, may sometimes trail behind the current literature, which is why I am glad that you made your additions. It was a challenge to figure out the best way to integrate both classifications in a clear manner, and if you had further improvements to make, I'm sure they would be welcome. As to your other question -- we weren't given names for the sections of it in class, and I'm looking through the two assigned texts we used -- Grant's dissector 13th edition, and Gray's Anatomy for Students 2005 edition (totally unrelated to the 1917 edition) and neither one of those mentioned the divisions. I can't find any information about Fischer's 5-division system, apart from your citation at PMID 8837792, so if you know more about it, I'm sure it would be a welcome addition to the article. -- +++$+++ :I'm pleased to make your aquaintance, and I thank you for your contributions to that article from October of last year. To answer your questions: on the anatomy pages, per [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(medicine-related_articles)#Naming_conventions]], the [[Terminologia Anatomica]] ("TA") is preferred for anatomy articles wherever possible, and TA currently uses that four division system (at least according to Dorlands -- for example, see [http://www.mercksource.com/pp/us/cns/cns_hl_dorlands.jspzQzpgzEzzSzppdocszSzuszSzcommonzSzdorlandszSzdorlandzSzdmd_p_07zPzhtm#12616500 here], and the corresponding links for the other branches.) The current TA also aligns with the terminology from the 1917 edition of [[Gray's Anatomy]] ("In considering the course and relations of this vessel it may be divided into four portions: cervical, petrous, cavernous, and cerebral", as shown [http://education.yahoo.com/reference/gray/subjects/subject?id=146#p566 here].) Of course, the TA, being an international standard updated infrequently, may sometimes trail behind the current literature, which is why I am glad that you made your additions. It was a challenge to figure out the best way to integrate both classifications in a clear manner, and if you had further improvements to make, I'm sure they would be welcome. As to your other question -- we weren't given names for the sections of it in class, and I'm looking through the two assigned texts we used -- Grant's dissector 13th edition, and Gray's Anatomy for Students 2005 edition (totally unrelated to the 1917 edition) and neither one of those mentioned the divisions. I can't find any information about Fischer's 5-division system, apart from your citation at PMID 8837792, so if you know more about it, I'm sure it would be a welcome addition to the article. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 21:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
525311 +++$+++ Felgerkarb +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525309 +++$+++ 525310 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.178616000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the link to the Manual of Style for medicine articles. I will review it. Perhaps it is best if I expand on the discussion in the article to distinguish between TA and angiographic\/surgical anatomy, though that will probably be done tomorrow or the next day. Look forward to working with you more.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the link to the Manual of Style for medicine articles. I will review it. Perhaps it is best if I expand on the discussion in the article to distinguish between TA and angiographic/surgical anatomy, though that will probably be done tomorrow or the next day. Look forward to working with you more. [[User:Felgerkarb|Felgerkarb]] 02:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
525312 +++$+++ Felgerkarb +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525309 +++$+++ 525310 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.178751360E09 +++$+++ Ok, let me know what you think [[Internal_carotid_artery]].  +++$+++ ::Ok, let me know what you think [[Internal_carotid_artery]]. [[User:Felgerkarb|Felgerkarb]] 15:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
525313 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525309 +++$+++ 525312 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.178752440E09 +++$+++ I made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Internal_carotid_artery&diff=129546763&oldid=129542651 one change] -- the authority for the four-segment system is the current [[Terminologia Anatomica]], not the 1917 Gray's (though the 1917 Gray's agrees with the current TA.) But apart from that, I think we're getting very close. It would be nice if we could figure out more about Fischer's 1938 system, but that's not something we need to solve today. -- +++$+++ :::I made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Internal_carotid_artery&diff=129546763&oldid=129542651 one change] -- the authority for the four-segment system is the current [[Terminologia Anatomica]], not the 1917 Gray's (though the 1917 Gray's agrees with the current TA.) But apart from that, I think we're getting very close. It would be nice if we could figure out more about Fischer's 1938 system, but that's not something we need to solve today. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 16:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

530416 +++$+++ Giants27 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530416 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-17 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.242591240E09 +++$+++ Done with the next update queue sorry about the edit conflict, I'm awful with wikipedia time. haha--[[User:Giants27|<font face=\"Bauhaus 93\" color=\"black\" size=\"3\">Giants27<\/font>]] (<span>[[User talk:Giants27|<font color=\"black\">t<\/font>]]<\/span>|<span>[[Special:Contributions\/Giants27|<font color=\"black\">c<\/font>]]<\/span>|<span>[[Wikipedia:Editor review\/Giants27|<font color=\"black\">r<\/font>]]<\/span>|<span> +++$+++ Done with the next update queue sorry about the edit conflict, I'm awful with wikipedia time. haha--[[User:Giants27|<font face="Bauhaus 93" color="black" size="3">Giants27</font>]] (<span>[[User talk:Giants27|<font color="black">t</font>]]</span>|<span>[[Special:Contributions/Giants27|<font color="black">c</font>]]</span>|<span>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Giants27|<font color="black">r</font>]]</span>|<span>[[User:Giants27/guestbook|<font color="black">s</font>]]</span>) 13:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
530417 +++$+++ Giants27 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530416 +++$+++ 530416 +++$+++ 2009-05-17 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.242592200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that! I've been using refTools for a little while, what an amazing tool that one is.--[[User:Giants27|<font face=\"Bauhaus 93\" color=\"black\" size=\"3\">Giants27<\/font>]] (<span>[[User talk:Giants27|<font color=\"black\">t<\/font>]]<\/span>|<span>[[Special:Contributions\/Giants27|<font color=\"black\">c<\/font>]]<\/span>|<span>[[Wikipedia:Editor review\/Giants27|<font color=\"black\">r<\/font>]]<\/span>|<span> +++$+++ :Thanks for that! I've been using refTools for a little while, what an amazing tool that one is.--[[User:Giants27|<font face="Bauhaus 93" color="black" size="3">Giants27</font>]] (<span>[[User talk:Giants27|<font color="black">t</font>]]</span>|<span>[[Special:Contributions/Giants27|<font color="black">c</font>]]</span>|<span>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Giants27|<font color="black">r</font>]]</span>|<span>[[User:Giants27/guestbook|<font color="black">s</font>]]</span>) 13:30, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

6129 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6129 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-03 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.304483400E09 +++$+++ Hi. Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Larry_Hama&curid=1187318&diff=427162782&oldid=427161924 the photo], I personally don't think the problem is the fact that PermanentVacay's change was unilateral, since I change photos unilaterally all the time. It's part of [[WP:BOLD]], I believe, and it would be impossible to start a talk page discussion on ''every single'' photo change I implement. I ''sometimes'' start discussion when I'm not sure about a change, but not with every one. The problem I see with PermanentVacay's change is that it was ''arbitrary'', as his\/her photo is more poorly lit than the one already in the article, it's more blurry, and Hama is not facing the camera as in mine.  +++$+++ Hi. Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Larry_Hama&curid=1187318&diff=427162782&oldid=427161924 the photo], I personally don't think the problem is the fact that PermanentVacay's change was unilateral, since I change photos unilaterally all the time. It's part of [[WP:BOLD]], I believe, and it would be impossible to start a talk page discussion on ''every single'' photo change I implement. I ''sometimes'' start discussion when I'm not sure about a change, but not with every one. The problem I see with PermanentVacay's change is that it was ''arbitrary'', as his/her photo is more poorly lit than the one already in the article, it's more blurry, and Hama is not facing the camera as in mine. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 21:30, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
6130 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6129 +++$+++ 6129 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.304500920E09 +++$+++ I think the crucial point is when you say, \"That said, if an editor is replacing a clearly terrible picture with a reasonably decent one, then, yes, I agree a quick change can be fine.\" In other words, the issue is not the our newbie friend changed it unilaterally, but without just cause or an edit summary explaining his\/her rationale. Again, I haven't talked or discussed about the photo changes ''I've'' made.  +++$+++ :I think the crucial point is when you say, "That said, if an editor is replacing a clearly terrible picture with a reasonably decent one, then, yes, I agree a quick change can be fine." In other words, the issue is not the our newbie friend changed it unilaterally, but without just cause or an edit summary explaining his/her rationale. Again, I haven't talked or discussed about the photo changes ''I've'' made. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 02:22, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
6131 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6129 +++$+++ 6130 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.304503740E09 +++$+++ '''\"Because you're replacing clearly inferior images with better ones.\"''' Right, that's my point. The ''quality'' of the images. Not whether the change is unilateral, which is irrelevant. And since PermanentVacay is apparently a newbie, by admonishing him with ''unilateralism'' as the criterion in question, I believe you run the risk of driving away a potential good editor, who may come away from this thinking thinking that [[WP:BOLD|any edit]], good ''or'' bad, requires a consensus discussion. In any event, I left a message on PermanentVacay's clarifying this.  +++$+++ ::'''"Because you're replacing clearly inferior images with better ones."''' Right, that's my point. The ''quality'' of the images. Not whether the change is unilateral, which is irrelevant. And since PermanentVacay is apparently a newbie, by admonishing him with ''unilateralism'' as the criterion in question, I believe you run the risk of driving away a potential good editor, who may come away from this thinking thinking that [[WP:BOLD|any edit]], good ''or'' bad, requires a consensus discussion. In any event, I left a message on PermanentVacay's clarifying this. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 03:09, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
6132 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6129 +++$+++ 6131 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.304504580E09 +++$+++ But why you shift between one criterion and another when speaking of how to do enact such an edit? First you talk about ''quality'' (\"the editor who placed the inferior image believes it's not inferior\"), but then you say it requires ''discussion''. Which is it? Is it both? Is discussion required when the new photo is better? Was I required to start a discussion every time I replaced a photo? If not, then the fact that PV replaced the photo unilaterally isn't the point. The point is that it wasn't a better image.  +++$+++ :::But why you shift between one criterion and another when speaking of how to do enact such an edit? First you talk about ''quality'' ("the editor who placed the inferior image believes it's not inferior"), but then you say it requires ''discussion''. Which is it? Is it both? Is discussion required when the new photo is better? Was I required to start a discussion every time I replaced a photo? If not, then the fact that PV replaced the photo unilaterally isn't the point. The point is that it wasn't a better image. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 03:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
6133 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6129 +++$+++ 6132 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.304504880E09 +++$+++ Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks again. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 03:28, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

268274 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-01 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.212310260E09 +++$+++ Of course the plot section is written in an \"in-universe\" format, it's the plot description. Unless you write like, \"In scene X, Clark does blah blah blah\", then it's always in IU format. Go to any film or television article and they will all be the same.  +++$+++ Of course the plot section is written in an "in-universe" format, it's the plot description. Unless you write like, "In scene X, Clark does blah blah blah", then it's always in IU format. Go to any film or television article and they will all be the same. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 01:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
268275 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268274 +++$+++ 268274 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.212314640E09 +++$+++ I think you do not understand the meaning. Somewhere in the article you have to analyze the plot and put things in perspective. Click on what \"in universe\" meaning on the template and perhaps you will get it.  &ndash; +++$+++ :I think you do not understand the meaning. Somewhere in the article you have to analyze the plot and put things in perspective. Click on what "in universe" meaning on the template and perhaps you will get it.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
268276 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268274 +++$+++ 268275 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.212315480E09 +++$+++ Um, no. The plot section is precisely that, a plot section. The vast majority of film\/television related articles do not interlace real world information with the in-universe information that describes that events that transpire in the episode\/film. Check any film article, or any episode article. In fact, the only episode article that does do such a thing, that I'm aware of, is the one that I wrote personally ([[Pilot (Smallville)]]). I think you need to read WP:WAF's description of IU information and how it can be used inappropriately. A plot description that clearly identifies the episode it takes place in, does not contain original research, and does not go into obscene details is not a violation of any guideline on IU tone.  +++$+++ ::Um, no. The plot section is precisely that, a plot section. The vast majority of film/television related articles do not interlace real world information with the in-universe information that describes that events that transpire in the episode/film. Check any film article, or any episode article. In fact, the only episode article that does do such a thing, that I'm aware of, is the one that I wrote personally ([[Pilot (Smallville)]]). I think you need to read WP:WAF's description of IU information and how it can be used inappropriately. A plot description that clearly identifies the episode it takes place in, does not contain original research, and does not go into obscene details is not a violation of any guideline on IU tone. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 03:18, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
268277 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268274 +++$+++ 268276 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.212315840E09 +++$+++ Um, somewhere in the article you must give a clear eyed, objective view of the plot. Please read what the template says: {{inuniverse}}  &ndash; +++$+++ :::Um, somewhere in the article you must give a clear eyed, objective view of the plot. Please read what the template says: {{inuniverse}}  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
268278 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268274 +++$+++ 268277 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.212316140E09 +++$+++ If you believe there is original research in the section, please point it out, otherwise it is an \"objective view of the plot\". I don't need to read the template, I've been writing for fictional articles for quite some time now, and gotten plenty to featured status; I think I know what I'm doing. It says, \"An in-universe perspective describes the narrative from the perspective of characters within the fictional universe, treating it as if it were real and ignoring real-world context and sourced analysis. The threshold of what constitutes in-universe writing is making any effort to re-create or uphold the illusion of the original fiction by omitting real-world info.\" -- There's nothing real world omitted from the section. The article itself might be lacking some real world information, but that isn't an IU issue that's a [[WP:PLOT]] issue. There is a difference. Even then, [[User:Bignole\/Smallville season 2|I already have the real world information]] for that article, and the rest of them, I'm just a little too busy right not to clean it up and put it in. It's the same format as [[Smallville (season 1)]], and every other film article that is featured. If you read the \"Problems with IU\" section, the only thing that deals with plots is -- \"A plot synopsis written like an historical account.\" -- For that to happen the plot descriptions would need to be written in past tense. The only time past tense is used is when it is appropriate, which is a rare case. If you think there could still be some tweaking of the words to better present the info in present tense, cool, but adding OOU info into the plot is generally not done.  +++$+++ ::::If you believe there is original research in the section, please point it out, otherwise it is an "objective view of the plot". I don't need to read the template, I've been writing for fictional articles for quite some time now, and gotten plenty to featured status; I think I know what I'm doing. It says, "An in-universe perspective describes the narrative from the perspective of characters within the fictional universe, treating it as if it were real and ignoring real-world context and sourced analysis. The threshold of what constitutes in-universe writing is making any effort to re-create or uphold the illusion of the original fiction by omitting real-world info." -- There's nothing real world omitted from the section. The article itself might be lacking some real world information, but that isn't an IU issue that's a [[WP:PLOT]] issue. There is a difference. Even then, [[User:Bignole/Smallville season 2|I already have the real world information]] for that article, and the rest of them, I'm just a little too busy right not to clean it up and put it in. It's the same format as [[Smallville (season 1)]], and every other film article that is featured. If you read the "Problems with IU" section, the only thing that deals with plots is -- "A plot synopsis written like an historical account." -- For that to happen the plot descriptions would need to be written in past tense. The only time past tense is used is when it is appropriate, which is a rare case. If you think there could still be some tweaking of the words to better present the info in present tense, cool, but adding OOU info into the plot is generally not done. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 03:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
268279 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268274 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.212316320E09 +++$+++ To write an article or section in a primarily IU style then I would have to incorporate every episode into one large section, as if it was a history lesson. Fortunately, each description is separated by when the episode airs. You clearly see that in \"Episode X\" these events occur. If you disagree, please feel free to take it up on the talk page of [[WP:WAF]], because I'm sure others would love to get in on the convo. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::::::To write an article or section in a primarily IU style then I would have to incorporate every episode into one large section, as if it was a history lesson. Fortunately, each description is separated by when the episode airs. You clearly see that in "Episode X" these events occur. If you disagree, please feel free to take it up on the talk page of [[WP:WAF]], because I'm sure others would love to get in on the convo. Cheers. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 03:32, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
268280 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268274 +++$+++ 268274 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.212316560E09 +++$+++ In simple terms, you cannot [[WP:WIKILAWYER|WikiLawyer]] the idea behind not writing in an IU tone. That is what you are doing, and that is the point you are missing. There is a difference between an article that writes in an IU tone (trust me, I can show you plenty ...[[Freddy Kreuger|here's one for example]]) and a page that just happens to have primarily plot information.  +++$+++ :In simple terms, you cannot [[WP:WIKILAWYER|WikiLawyer]] the idea behind not writing in an IU tone. That is what you are doing, and that is the point you are missing. There is a difference between an article that writes in an IU tone (trust me, I can show you plenty ...[[Freddy Kreuger|here's one for example]]) and a page that just happens to have primarily plot information. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 03:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

530420 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-21 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.242956460E09 +++$+++ hey there RB, how you doin?  Quick question or two for you.  is that [[1952 in NASCAR]] something that could ever be taken to GA status?  or is there just too much \"list\" stuff there for that?  If it could, what would we (or I), need to do to get it there? \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ hey there RB, how you doin?  Quick question or two for you.  is that [[1952 in NASCAR]] something that could ever be taken to GA status?  or is there just too much "list" stuff there for that?  If it could, what would we (or I), need to do to get it there? — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 18:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
530421 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530420 +++$+++ 530420 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.242984660E09 +++$+++ I wonder if would be a better candidate for [[WP:FL|featured list]]? Good question. I don't see any GA or FA on a topic like this. There's a lot of list-type items in the article. I doubt we could find enough information to write a thorough article fully describing the season. I was thinking a little about trying to do a featured list, and the [[Daytona 500 pole position winners]] article was at the front of my mind. What do you think about that instead? '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I wonder if would be a better candidate for [[WP:FL|featured list]]? Good question. I don't see any GA or FA on a topic like this. There's a lot of list-type items in the article. I doubt we could find enough information to write a thorough article fully describing the season. I was thinking a little about trying to do a featured list, and the [[Daytona 500 pole position winners]] article was at the front of my mind. What do you think about that instead? '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:31, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
530422 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530420 +++$+++ 530421 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.242988080E09 +++$+++ You betcha!  I had never seen the 500 pole list before ... what can I do to help?  And I do agree that while we could add some prose to the season recap, it would be tough to find sources to fill in sections like: Media coverage, Safety in 1952, ummm ... Injuries, Controversies... etc.  The kind of stuff that would round out the article.  So count me in on the 500 list.  What do we need to do? \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ::You betcha!  I had never seen the 500 pole list before ... what can I do to help?  And I do agree that while we could add some prose to the season recap, it would be tough to find sources to fill in sections like: Media coverage, Safety in 1952, ummm ... Injuries, Controversies... etc.  The kind of stuff that would round out the article.  So count me in on the 500 list.  What do we need to do? — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 03:28, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
530423 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530420 +++$+++ 530421 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.242988320E09 +++$+++ WOW ... \"SOURCES\"! .. ok, I'll start digging up sources, and we'll get it up to FA.  I hadn't realized that there were actually \"0\" references on that page ... lol. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ::WOW ... "SOURCES"! .. ok, I'll start digging up sources, and we'll get it up to FA.  I hadn't realized that there were actually "0" references on that page ... lol. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 03:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
530424 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530420 +++$+++ 530423 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.242988380E09 +++$+++ (ec)'''Lots of citations.''' First of all - the results should be easy. The hard part will be trying to find references for the different ways that the pole position was determined. The second round of qualifying information sounds right to my memory, but we need to cite it. I won't be around much at all until late Monday - races at [[Madison International Speedway]] on Friday, then camping for the holiday weekend at my sister's place. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::(ec)'''Lots of citations.''' First of all - the results should be easy. The hard part will be trying to find references for the different ways that the pole position was determined. The second round of qualifying information sounds right to my memory, but we need to cite it. I won't be around much at all until late Monday - races at [[Madison International Speedway]] on Friday, then camping for the holiday weekend at my sister's place. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
530425 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530420 +++$+++ 530423 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.242988500E09 +++$+++ Oh, the best reference would be NASCAR's website or books. Racing-reference is NOT preferable to a solid, reliable source like the official website. Might as well do it right in the first place instead of doing it over a second time. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Oh, the best reference would be NASCAR's website or books. Racing-reference is NOT preferable to a solid, reliable source like the official website. Might as well do it right in the first place instead of doing it over a second time. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
530426 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530420 +++$+++ 530425 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.242992040E09 +++$+++ OK, I just looked through my books (except for the 1 that I haven't found yet), but mostly driver info, and race results.  I'll be at a used book store soon, and am currently building a reference library for WP purposes - so I'll keep an eye open for NASCAR stuff most definitely.  I knew nascar.com was a preferred site; but, didn't know that racing-reference was marginal - glad you clued me in to that little tid bit.  Now to the personal stuff - HEY - HAVE A GREAT TIME! ... LOL. Sounds like a great weekend.  I'm in and out still, but should have some time Sat. night, and while I'm watching races on Sun.  Sounds to me like we have a plan buddy - ;).  Have fun, be safe. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ::::OK, I just looked through my books (except for the 1 that I haven't found yet), but mostly driver info, and race results.  I'll be at a used book store soon, and am currently building a reference library for WP purposes - so I'll keep an eye open for NASCAR stuff most definitely.  I knew nascar.com was a preferred site; but, didn't know that racing-reference was marginal - glad you clued me in to that little tid bit.  Now to the personal stuff - HEY - HAVE A GREAT TIME! ... LOL. Sounds like a great weekend.  I'm in and out still, but should have some time Sat. night, and while I'm watching races on Sun.  Sounds to me like we have a plan buddy - ;).  Have fun, be safe. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 04:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
530427 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530420 +++$+++ 530426 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.243083060E09 +++$+++ Update.  Trying to work out Sat. night as an evening at Pittsburgh Motor Speedway - Big Block Mods coming in for the first time in almost 20 years.  Will still work on refs as I can, but might not be as quick as I hoped.  CYA at the races ;) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :::::Update.  Trying to work out Sat. night as an evening at Pittsburgh Motor Speedway - Big Block Mods coming in for the first time in almost 20 years.  Will still work on refs as I can, but might not be as quick as I hoped.  CYA at the races ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 05:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
530428 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530420 +++$+++ 530427 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.243104240E09 +++$+++ Weather was rainy by Madison. So instead of driving 2 hours south, I drove 1.5 hours north to a karting track in northern Wisconsin. I'll catch Madison later. I'm leaving for camping in my sister's back yard within a few hours for some urban camping. I might take a break from camping to go to Sunday night races at a nearby track, but not if there's a bunch of family around the campfire. Have a great time watching the big blocks! There aren't any big block modifieds racing around Wisconsin. Have a nice weekend! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::Weather was rainy by Madison. So instead of driving 2 hours south, I drove 1.5 hours north to a karting track in northern Wisconsin. I'll catch Madison later. I'm leaving for camping in my sister's back yard within a few hours for some urban camping. I might take a break from camping to go to Sunday night races at a nearby track, but not if there's a bunch of family around the campfire. Have a great time watching the big blocks! There aren't any big block modifieds racing around Wisconsin. Have a nice weekend! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 11:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

572662 +++$+++  +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 572662 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-17 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.134822480E09 +++$+++ I see you have a BugZilla account. How do you make it so it doesn't show your email to everybody?  +++$+++ I see you have a BugZilla account. How do you make it so it doesn't show your email to everybody? [[User:Titoxd|Tito]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:#008000;">xd</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Titoxd|?!?]] - [[Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy|did you read this?]])</sup> 04:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
572663 +++$+++  +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 572662 +++$+++ 572662 +++$+++ 2005-12-17 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.134822780E09 +++$+++ Hmm. Well, that same bug is now being used for [[WP:SEMI]] (which passed and now has Jimbo support!) so you might want to go there and say that... it is [[BugZilla:675]].  +++$+++ : Hmm. Well, that same bug is now being used for [[WP:SEMI]] (which passed and now has Jimbo support!) so you might want to go there and say that... it is [[BugZilla:675]]. [[User:Titoxd|Tito]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:#008000;">xd</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Titoxd|?!?]] - [[Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy|did you read this?]])</sup> 04:33, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
572664 +++$+++  +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 572662 +++$+++ 572663 +++$+++ 2005-12-17 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.134823320E09 +++$+++ Yes, it has passed with '''''104 support \/ 4 oppose \/ 2 neutral''''', comments by Avar and Brion (two developers), two stewards (Anthere, with questions, and Datrio, with support) and approval by Jimbo [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=31670664 here], so it completely safe it has passed.  +++$+++ :: Yes, it has passed with '''''104 support / 4 oppose / 2 neutral''''', comments by Avar and Brion (two developers), two stewards (Anthere, with questions, and Datrio, with support) and approval by Jimbo [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=31670664 here], so it completely safe it has passed. [[User:Titoxd|Tito]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:#008000;">xd</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Titoxd|?!?]] - [[Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy|did you read this?]])</sup> 04:42, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

268281 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268281 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-01 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.212316800E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict)No. Original research is not the issue. But somewhere you should give a realistic view versus the fictional view of the piece or episode you are describing. The objective view could be in one big piece to give perspective on the individual episodes you are describing. The point is to somewhere separate reality from fiction. You present the episodes as if they are reality with no counterbalance. But I do not care enough to continue this conversation further. Eventually it will be caught by someone, if you do not do the right thing now. This is at an end. &ndash; +++$+++ (edit conflict)No. Original research is not the issue. But somewhere you should give a realistic view versus the fictional view of the piece or episode you are describing. The objective view could be in one big piece to give perspective on the individual episodes you are describing. The point is to somewhere separate reality from fiction. You present the episodes as if they are reality with no counterbalance. But I do not care enough to continue this conversation further. Eventually it will be caught by someone, if you do not do the right thing now. This is at an end. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
268282 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268281 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.212317040E09 +++$+++ Like I said, take it up at WAF if you disagree (which you clearly do). Please do not get all uptight about it and say, \"I don't care enough\", because you obviously did when you placed the tag on the page. If you don't wish to go to WAF and get a real consensus on the issue, that's your problem, not mine. Either way, I hope you have a pleasant evening (morning if that's the case).  +++$+++ ::Like I said, take it up at WAF if you disagree (which you clearly do). Please do not get all uptight about it and say, "I don't care enough", because you obviously did when you placed the tag on the page. If you don't wish to go to WAF and get a real consensus on the issue, that's your problem, not mine. Either way, I hope you have a pleasant evening (morning if that's the case). [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 03:44, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

6138 +++$+++ Curly Turkey +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6138 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-20 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.305891300E09 +++$+++ Looking at Doczilla's talk page, TJ Black still continues to slander me, so I don't think I'm comfortable pointing this out myself there.  Do you think you could?  <span style=\"padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;\"> +++$+++ Looking at Doczilla's talk page, TJ Black still continues to slander me, so I don't think I'm comfortable pointing this out myself there.  Do you think you could?  <span style="padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;">[[User:Curly Turkey|<b><span style="color:#520;">C</span><span style="color:#f60;">üRly</span><span style="color:#040;">T</span><span style="color:#090;">üRkey</span></b>]]<small><sup style="margin-left:1.5ex;">[[User_talk:Curly Turkey|Talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-5ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Curly Turkey|Contribs]]</sub></small></span> 04:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
6139 +++$+++ Curly Turkey +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6138 +++$+++ 6138 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.306041960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for stepping in and helping out, but I'd actually hoped you'd post a note to DocZilla.  I think he (Doczilla) may have mistaken TJ Black's response to my Cerebus proposal for TJ Black continuing the squabble.  In which case, TJ Black would be justified in being a little miffed.  <span style=\"padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for stepping in and helping out, but I'd actually hoped you'd post a note to DocZilla.  I think he (Doczilla) may have mistaken TJ Black's response to my Cerebus proposal for TJ Black continuing the squabble.  In which case, TJ Black would be justified in being a little miffed.  <span style="padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;">[[User:Curly Turkey|<b><span style="color:#520;">C</span><span style="color:#f60;">üRly</span><span style="color:#040;">T</span><span style="color:#090;">üRkey</span></b>]]<small><sup style="margin-left:1.5ex;">[[User_talk:Curly Turkey|Talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-5ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Curly Turkey|Contribs]]</sub></small></span> 22:26, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

268284 +++$+++ Otolemur crassicaudatus +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268284 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-04 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.212629340E09 +++$+++ Why you changed the image size? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rongorongo&diff=217123048&oldid=217121497] ''' +++$+++ Why you changed the image size? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rongorongo&diff=217123048&oldid=217121497] '''[[User:Otolemur crassicaudatus|<font color="002bb8">Otolemur crassicaudatus</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Otolemur crassicaudatus|talk]]) 18:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
268285 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268284 +++$+++ 268284 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.212629580E09 +++$+++ I feel like the article is going to be penalized in [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Rongorongo]] because of things like the image size and the method of citations when the article is actually very good. You can change the image back if you don't like it. I did that as an experiement.  &ndash; +++$+++ :I feel like the article is going to be penalized in [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rongorongo]] because of things like the image size and the method of citations when the article is actually very good. You can change the image back if you don't like it. I did that as an experiement.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

6141 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6141 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-24 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.306225920E09 +++$+++ Hi. Sorry you don't like the new pic, but Sienkiewicz said that he didn't like the old one. I happen to agree with him, since that old photos is one of the photos in which I kinda messed up the pupils in trying to fix the red eye. As for his complexion, well, that's really what he looked like. If I reduce the saturation in his skin, and crop out his hand in the foreground, would you be okay with putting the newer pic back in there? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. Sorry you don't like the new pic, but Sienkiewicz said that he didn't like the old one. I happen to agree with him, since that old photos is one of the photos in which I kinda messed up the pupils in trying to fix the red eye. As for his complexion, well, that's really what he looked like. If I reduce the saturation in his skin, and crop out his hand in the foreground, would you be okay with putting the newer pic back in there? Thanks. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 01:32, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
6142 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6141 +++$+++ 6141 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.306232940E09 +++$+++ Not really a taxi fan. I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Nightscream#Reality_Television|do a lot of work] on reality TV articles. ''[[Pawn Stars]]'', ''[[The Real World]]'', ''[[Celebrity Rehab]]'', etc. Most of the info in those articles is my work.  +++$+++ :Not really a taxi fan. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nightscream#Reality_Television|do a lot of work] on reality TV articles. ''[[Pawn Stars]]'', ''[[The Real World]]'', ''[[Celebrity Rehab]]'', etc. Most of the info in those articles is my work. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 03:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
6143 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6141 +++$+++ 6142 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.306233180E09 +++$+++ You had no idea I was an admin?????  Dude, I've been one [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship\/Nightscream_2 since November 2007!] :-)  +++$+++ ::You had no idea I was an admin?????  Dude, I've been one [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Nightscream_2 since November 2007!] :-) [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 03:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
6144 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6141 +++$+++ 6143 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.306239480E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that sometimes happens when uploading new versions of images. Sometimes it takes time for it to show up.  +++$+++ :::Yeah, that sometimes happens when uploading new versions of images. Sometimes it takes time for it to show up. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 05:18, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

268286 +++$+++ Nurmsook +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268286 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-09 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.212996060E09 +++$+++ Hi! The copyediting that you've done is great, and if you would be willing to continue that would be excellent. This is my first FA nomination so I know it won't be at the highest level possible, and any help to get it there is much appreciated. In response to a few of your concerns, I will remove a few wikilinks. I know right now I have a few pages linked more than once, so I can at least limit the linking to one time only for the most part. For the Charitable contributions section, how would you suggest I merge it into the Personal Life heading? Should I include it as a separate paragraph, or do I add it into the prose of the personal life section? Lastly, you said \"P.S. What happened at the end of his career that he did not suit up for three years? What is the state of his career now? I am not quite clear.\" I'm not quite clear on this statement. He is still an active player, so somewhere I must have led on that he is retired? Could you let me know the area of the article that hinted at this? Thanks for the comments! \u2013  +++$+++ Hi! The copyediting that you've done is great, and if you would be willing to continue that would be excellent. This is my first FA nomination so I know it won't be at the highest level possible, and any help to get it there is much appreciated. In response to a few of your concerns, I will remove a few wikilinks. I know right now I have a few pages linked more than once, so I can at least limit the linking to one time only for the most part. For the Charitable contributions section, how would you suggest I merge it into the Personal Life heading? Should I include it as a separate paragraph, or do I add it into the prose of the personal life section? Lastly, you said "P.S. What happened at the end of his career that he did not suit up for three years? What is the state of his career now? I am not quite clear." I'm not quite clear on this statement. He is still an active player, so somewhere I must have led on that he is retired? Could you let me know the area of the article that hinted at this? Thanks for the comments! – [[User:Nurmsook|Nurmsook!]] ([[User talk:Nurmsook|talk]]) 00:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268287 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268286 +++$+++ 268286 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.212996960E09 +++$+++ I think you need to sum up his career somehow. I don't know how, but the ending to an FAC is important. Perhaps some sort of summary statement about his place in hockey overall. It sounds like no matter what he does from now on, because of his accomplishments so far he has left his mark as a player.  &ndash; +++$+++ :I think you need to sum up his career somehow. I don't know how, but the ending to an FAC is important. Perhaps some sort of summary statement about his place in hockey overall. It sounds like no matter what he does from now on, because of his accomplishments so far he has left his mark as a player.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

268288 +++$+++ Trebor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-09 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.212999960E09 +++$+++ [[User:Epbr123]] did not add the IMDB reference for the name of Eric Brewer. The diff of his only contribution to the article is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Eric_Brewer_%28ice_hockey%29&diff=218042338&oldid=218041924 here]. Note, all he did was change \"New York Times\" to \"The New York Times\" in one of the references.  +++$+++ [[User:Epbr123]] did not add the IMDB reference for the name of Eric Brewer. The diff of his only contribution to the article is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eric_Brewer_%28ice_hockey%29&diff=218042338&oldid=218041924 here]. Note, all he did was change "New York Times" to "The New York Times" in one of the references. [[User:Trebor|Trebor]] ([[User talk:Trebor|talk]]) 01:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268289 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268288 +++$+++ 268288 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.213000320E09 +++$+++ I am confused about the diffs. Are you saying I was wrong on both diffs? That is certainly not the way it seemed at the time when he did his drive-by edits in the middle of our FAC edits. I appologize for any incompetency on my part in understanding diffs. Drive-by edits are confusing and disruptive. I admit I do not have a firm grasp of the technology of Wikipedia. I am an editor and a copy editor only. However, I think I will stay away from FACs after my current commitment ends.  &ndash; +++$+++ :I am confused about the diffs. Are you saying I was wrong on both diffs? That is certainly not the way it seemed at the time when he did his drive-by edits in the middle of our FAC edits. I appologize for any incompetency on my part in understanding diffs. Drive-by edits are confusing and disruptive. I admit I do not have a firm grasp of the technology of Wikipedia. I am an editor and a copy editor only. However, I think I will stay away from FACs after my current commitment ends.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268290 +++$+++ Trebor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268288 +++$+++ 268289 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.213000860E09 +++$+++ Okay, Epbr made two edits. His edit to [[Eric Brewer (ice hockey)]] was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Eric_Brewer_%28ice_hockey%29&diff=218042338&oldid=218041924] which changed \"New York Times\" to \"The New York Times\". Later, someone removed the IMDB reference for Brewer's name, but this was not anything to do with Epbr's edit. His edit to [[RongoRongo]] was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rongorongo&diff=218052786&oldid=217858139 this], which was making changes related to [[WP:MOSNUM]] - the style guideline for dates and numbers. Per that guideline, adding a wikilink to \"October 11\" was definitely correct and changing \"twenty-six\" to 26 isn't incorrect (the guideline says either is okay). So neither of his edits did anything wrong.  +++$+++ ::Okay, Epbr made two edits. His edit to [[Eric Brewer (ice hockey)]] was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eric_Brewer_%28ice_hockey%29&diff=218042338&oldid=218041924] which changed "New York Times" to "The New York Times". Later, someone removed the IMDB reference for Brewer's name, but this was not anything to do with Epbr's edit. His edit to [[RongoRongo]] was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rongorongo&diff=218052786&oldid=217858139 this], which was making changes related to [[WP:MOSNUM]] - the style guideline for dates and numbers. Per that guideline, adding a wikilink to "October 11" was definitely correct and changing "twenty-six" to 26 isn't incorrect (the guideline says either is okay). So neither of his edits did anything wrong. [[User:Trebor|Trebor]] ([[User talk:Trebor|talk]]) 01:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268291 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268288 +++$+++ 268290 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.213001760E09 +++$+++ O.K. I do  apologize genuinely. Although the second edit relating to [[WP:MOSNUM]] you say can be either way, it actually is incorrect according to normal standards of English. The edits looked to me at the time, when examined by me just after his edit and going by what was highlighted in red (which apparently is not the way to tell) incorrect. Therefore, I do not know how to tell what edit is what and will probably cease editing FAC's after my current commitment ends. I apparently cannot deal with drive-by edits.  Sorry for any disturbance I created. I am adamantly against the type of drive-by edits the nominee engages in on FACs. People like me cannot deal with such superficial involvement in articles. Perhaps it is the \"new\" generation taking over which will drive editors like me, who do not want to be an admin, away after closing in on 50,000 edits. It is the way of the world. The only way I can survive here is by occasionally voicing my opinion as it is clear my time is coming to a close. It is also clear the nominee will pass anyway, so my voice is irrelevant. &ndash; +++$+++ :::O.K. I do  apologize genuinely. Although the second edit relating to [[WP:MOSNUM]] you say can be either way, it actually is incorrect according to normal standards of English. The edits looked to me at the time, when examined by me just after his edit and going by what was highlighted in red (which apparently is not the way to tell) incorrect. Therefore, I do not know how to tell what edit is what and will probably cease editing FAC's after my current commitment ends. I apparently cannot deal with drive-by edits.  Sorry for any disturbance I created. I am adamantly against the type of drive-by edits the nominee engages in on FACs. People like me cannot deal with such superficial involvement in articles. Perhaps it is the "new" generation taking over which will drive editors like me, who do not want to be an admin, away after closing in on 50,000 edits. It is the way of the world. The only way I can survive here is by occasionally voicing my opinion as it is clear my time is coming to a close. It is also clear the nominee will pass anyway, so my voice is irrelevant. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268292 +++$+++ Trebor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268288 +++$+++ 268291 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.213002240E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't like to think of you being driven away from anything - we need as many talented editors as we can get. The \"drive-by\" edits are normally minor fixes of [[WP:MOS|manual of style]] issues, and are intended to make only a small improvement to the article. And while those are improvements, we obviously also need people like yourself who want to write content for articles and make more thoughtful suggestions about changes. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask :)  +++$+++ ::::I wouldn't like to think of you being driven away from anything - we need as many talented editors as we can get. The "drive-by" edits are normally minor fixes of [[WP:MOS|manual of style]] issues, and are intended to make only a small improvement to the article. And while those are improvements, we obviously also need people like yourself who want to write content for articles and make more thoughtful suggestions about changes. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask :) [[User:Trebor|Trebor]] ([[User talk:Trebor|talk]]) 02:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

6145 +++$+++ Curly Turkey +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6145 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-24 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.306234020E09 +++$+++ If it's the lack of citation that's the problem, citations would be easy to find.  If it's the wording, then it could easily be reworded.  If it's something else, please let me know.  <span style=\"padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;\"> +++$+++ If it's the lack of citation that's the problem, citations would be easy to find.  If it's the wording, then it could easily be reworded.  If it's something else, please let me know.  <span style="padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;">[[User:Curly Turkey|<b><span style="color:#520;">C</span><span style="color:#f60;">üRly</span><span style="color:#040;">T</span><span style="color:#090;">üRkey</span></b>]]<small><sup style="margin-left:1.5ex;">[[User_talk:Curly Turkey|Talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-5ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Curly Turkey|Contribs]]</sub></small></span> 03:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
6146 +++$+++ Curly Turkey +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6145 +++$+++ 6145 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.306234680E09 +++$+++ Oh, it seems you were objecting to the \"6000-page\" bit.  Actually, the fact that it was intended as a 6000-page book is well-documented, and it was promoted as such by Sim since quite early on (issue #12, was it?).  There really is no comparison to Fantastic Four.  Cerebus was designed to be collected and read in collected form.  It was ''serialized'' monthly.  A more apt comparison would be to serialized 19th Century novels.  You can check out a list of refs [[User:Curly Turkey\/Sandbox#Cerebus 6000-page story refs|here]].  If you don't object, I'll put it back in with refs in a less \"hype-y\" manner.<span style=\"padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;\"> +++$+++ :Oh, it seems you were objecting to the "6000-page" bit.  Actually, the fact that it was intended as a 6000-page book is well-documented, and it was promoted as such by Sim since quite early on (issue #12, was it?).  There really is no comparison to Fantastic Four.  Cerebus was designed to be collected and read in collected form.  It was ''serialized'' monthly.  A more apt comparison would be to serialized 19th Century novels.  You can check out a list of refs [[User:Curly Turkey/Sandbox#Cerebus 6000-page story refs|here]].  If you don't object, I'll put it back in with refs in a less "hype-y" manner.<span style="padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;">[[User:Curly Turkey|<b><span style="color:#520;">C</span><span style="color:#f60;">üRly</span><span style="color:#040;">T</span><span style="color:#090;">üRkey</span></b>]]<small><sup style="margin-left:1.5ex;">[[User_talk:Curly Turkey|Talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-5ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Curly Turkey|Contribs]]</sub></small></span> 03:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
6147 +++$+++ Curly Turkey +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6145 +++$+++ 6146 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.306300140E09 +++$+++ As for the 6000-page story, please look at the quotes [[User:Curly Turkey\/Sandbox#Cerebus 6000-page story refs|here]].  Sim promoted it as such, ''and'' it was accepted as such by the community, in books, magazines and blogs.  Nobody has ever made such a claim about Fantastic Four, nor would one be expected to.  Please note that one of the citations even has \"6000-page graphic novel\" in the ''title''.  <span style=\"padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;\"> +++$+++ ::As for the 6000-page story, please look at the quotes [[User:Curly Turkey/Sandbox#Cerebus 6000-page story refs|here]].  Sim promoted it as such, ''and'' it was accepted as such by the community, in books, magazines and blogs.  Nobody has ever made such a claim about Fantastic Four, nor would one be expected to.  Please note that one of the citations even has "6000-page graphic novel" in the ''title''.  <span style="padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;">[[User:Curly Turkey|<b><span style="color:#520;">C</span><span style="color:#f60;">üRly</span><span style="color:#040;">T</span><span style="color:#090;">üRkey</span></b>]]<small><sup style="margin-left:1.5ex;">[[User_talk:Curly Turkey|Talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-5ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Curly Turkey|Contribs]]</sub></small></span> 22:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
6148 +++$+++ Curly Turkey +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6145 +++$+++ 6147 +++$+++ 2011-05-25 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.306307400E09 +++$+++ As for the images, thanks for the offer to help, but I don't intend to do anything about them.  I was still learning the bounds for the inclusion of images, and crossed them without realizing it (for example, I put Cerebus and Chester Brown images in their navboxes...It hadn't occurred to me that that might be out of line.  Now I know better, and why, so I won't try that again).  The images I thought were important to include are all still there.  <span style=\"padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;\"> +++$+++ :::As for the images, thanks for the offer to help, but I don't intend to do anything about them.  I was still learning the bounds for the inclusion of images, and crossed them without realizing it (for example, I put Cerebus and Chester Brown images in their navboxes...It hadn't occurred to me that that might be out of line.  Now I know better, and why, so I won't try that again).  The images I thought were important to include are all still there.  <span style="padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;">[[User:Curly Turkey|<b><span style="color:#520;">C</span><span style="color:#f60;">üRly</span><span style="color:#040;">T</span><span style="color:#090;">üRkey</span></b>]]<small><sup style="margin-left:1.5ex;">[[User_talk:Curly Turkey|Talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-5ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Curly Turkey|Contribs]]</sub></small></span> 00:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
6149 +++$+++ Curly Turkey +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6145 +++$+++ 6147 +++$+++ 2011-05-25 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.306307700E09 +++$+++ Oh, and I didn't realized you were a published writer (I'm definitely not!  I just got sick of the how poor so many important articles on alternative comics\/cartoonists were, and finally decided to do something about it after five years or so of griping).  Is your (pen?) name a secret? <span style=\"padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;\"> +++$+++ :::Oh, and I didn't realized you were a published writer (I'm definitely not!  I just got sick of the how poor so many important articles on alternative comics/cartoonists were, and finally decided to do something about it after five years or so of griping).  Is your (pen?) name a secret? <span style="padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;">[[User:Curly Turkey|<b><span style="color:#520;">C</span><span style="color:#f60;">üRly</span><span style="color:#040;">T</span><span style="color:#090;">üRkey</span></b>]]<small><sup style="margin-left:1.5ex;">[[User_talk:Curly Turkey|Talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-5ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Curly Turkey|Contribs]]</sub></small></span> 00:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

175787 +++$+++ Igordebraga +++$+++ MikeAllen +++$+++ 175787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.312588140E09 +++$+++ Since you helped with the [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides\/archive1|Peer review]] of [[Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides]], could you take a look at the article now? I've put up to a GA nomination (which I need to pass [[Wikipedia:Featured_topic_criteria#Current_Retention_Periods|before the 20th]]), and need some input. Thanks.  +++$+++ Since you helped with the [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides/archive1|Peer review]] of [[Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides]], could you take a look at the article now? I've put up to a GA nomination (which I need to pass [[Wikipedia:Featured_topic_criteria#Current_Retention_Periods|before the 20th]]), and need some input. Thanks. [[User:Igordebraga|igordebraga]] [[User_talk:Igordebraga|≠]] 16:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
175788 +++$+++ MikeAllen +++$+++ MikeAllen +++$+++ 175787 +++$+++ 175787 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312615200E09 +++$+++ Hi I've never done a GA review, but I'm very aware of the criteria (I've gotten 5 up to GA recently; 4 being film articles). I'll be more than happy to make this my first. \u2014<span style=\"solid;background:#5D8AA8; border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; font-family: Segoe Print\">''' +++$+++ :Hi I've never done a GA review, but I'm very aware of the criteria (I've gotten 5 up to GA recently; 4 being film articles). I'll be more than happy to make this my first. —<span style="solid;background:#5D8AA8; border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; font-family: Segoe Print">'''[[User:MikeAllen|<font color="#3FFF00">Mike</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:MikeAllen|<font color="#3FFF00">Allen</font>]]'''</span>  00:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
175789 +++$+++ MikeAllen +++$+++ MikeAllen +++$+++ 175787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312615320E09 +++$+++ PS. I can't believe it's been a year since I reviewed the article.  Time flies.. \u2014<span style=\"solid;background:#5D8AA8; border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; font-family: Segoe Print\">''' +++$+++ :::PS. I can't believe it's been a year since I reviewed the article.  Time flies.. —<span style="solid;background:#5D8AA8; border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; font-family: Segoe Print">'''[[User:MikeAllen|<font color="#3FFF00">Mike</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:MikeAllen|<font color="#3FFF00">Allen</font>]]'''</span>  00:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
175790 +++$+++ MikeAllen +++$+++ MikeAllen +++$+++ 175787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312617360E09 +++$+++ I'm working on it, and so far it is ''on hold''.  I've seeing some problems, but so far they can be fixed by the retention date. \u2014<span style=\"solid;background:#5D8AA8; border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; font-family: Segoe Print\">''' +++$+++ ::::I'm working on it, and so far it is ''on hold''.  I've seeing some problems, but so far they can be fixed by the retention date. —<span style="solid;background:#5D8AA8; border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; font-family: Segoe Print">'''[[User:MikeAllen|<font color="#3FFF00">Mike</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:MikeAllen|<font color="#3FFF00">Allen</font>]]'''</span>  00:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

268293 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-08 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.212959400E09 +++$+++ I just saw that Grove Press, Inc., v. Gerstein was a red link and thought this might interest you.  It would make a very interesting DYK.  More about it [[Henry_Miller#Biography|here]].  The supporting source in that article is: Hutchison, Earl R. ''Tropic of Cancer on Trial: A Case History of Censorship''. New York: Grove Press, 1968.  +++$+++ I just saw that Grove Press, Inc., v. Gerstein was a red link and thought this might interest you.  It would make a very interesting DYK.  More about it [[Henry_Miller#Biography|here]].  The supporting source in that article is: Hutchison, Earl R. ''Tropic of Cancer on Trial: A Case History of Censorship''. New York: Grove Press, 1968. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 14:10, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
268294 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268293 +++$+++ 268293 +++$+++ 2008-06-08 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.212972540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for thinking of that for me. I looked it up and, unfortunately, it is only of those cases that Google can find nothing about except mere mentions regarding the opinion in other cases. Thanks for thinking of me!  &ndash; +++$+++ :Thanks for thinking of that for me. I looked it up and, unfortunately, it is only of those cases that Google can find nothing about except mere mentions regarding the opinion in other cases. Thanks for thinking of me!  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
268295 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268293 +++$+++ 268294 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.213044000E09 +++$+++ No problem.  I just found another source:  Rembar, Charles.  ''The End of Obscenity: The Trials of Lady Chatterley, Tropic of Cancer, and Fanny Hill''. New York: Random House, 1968. It looks interesting so I'll keep one eye open in case I find you something.  +++$+++ ::No problem.  I just found another source:  Rembar, Charles.  ''The End of Obscenity: The Trials of Lady Chatterley, Tropic of Cancer, and Fanny Hill''. New York: Random House, 1968. It looks interesting so I'll keep one eye open in case I find you something. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 13:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268296 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268293 +++$+++ 268295 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.213044180E09 +++$+++ FYI...there's a lot online, [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=IEXJSIxLcBAC&dq= here].  +++$+++ :::FYI...there's a lot online, [http://books.google.com/books?id=IEXJSIxLcBAC&dq= here]. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 13:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268297 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268293 +++$+++ 268296 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.213045260E09 +++$+++ Forget everything I said above.  The ''real'' article is [[Charles Rembar]] - and it's a stub! :)  +++$+++ ::::Forget everything I said above.  The ''real'' article is [[Charles Rembar]] - and it's a stub! :) [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 14:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268298 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268293 +++$+++ 268297 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.213046220E09 +++$+++ [[Lady Chatterley's Lover]] and [[D.H. Lawrence]] to [[Henry Miller]] and [[Tropic of Cancer]] to [[Lenny Bruce]] and his [[nightclub]] performances to [[Joe Redner]] and his [[strip club]]s, etc. The lawyers in involved in these cases tend to  have a low profile.  &ndash; +++$+++ :::::[[Lady Chatterley's Lover]] and [[D.H. Lawrence]] to [[Henry Miller]] and [[Tropic of Cancer]] to [[Lenny Bruce]] and his [[nightclub]] performances to [[Joe Redner]] and his [[strip club]]s, etc. The lawyers in involved in these cases tend to  have a low profile.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268299 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268293 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.213046640E09 +++$+++ What I am interested in is the legal reasoning involved in the court decisions. I will check out the books on Rembar. Why are you not writing an article on him? &ndash; +++$+++ :::::::What I am interested in is the legal reasoning involved in the court decisions. I will check out the books on Rembar. Why are you not writing an article on him? &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268300 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268293 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.213047420E09 +++$+++ Why did it take you so long to ask me that? :-)  +++$+++ ::::::::Why did it take you so long to ask me that? :-) [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 14:37, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268301 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268293 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.213047780E09 +++$+++ Well, what is your reason? :-) &ndash; +++$+++ :::::::::Well, what is your reason? :-) &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268302 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268293 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.213048020E09 +++$+++ I have none.  As long as you are aware of the stub, I'm happy. :-)  +++$+++ ::::::::::I have none.  As long as you are aware of the stub, I'm happy. :-) [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 14:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

6150 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-24 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.306265220E09 +++$+++ Hey I just wanted to get your opinion on this, according to [http:\/\/www.ilm.com\/ Industrial Light & Magic's official webpage] they are working on ''[[The Avengers (2012 film)|The Avengers]]''. I have not found any reliable media outlets reporting it. So my questions is should we wait until one picks it up or try to use the website itself as a source. The problem is websites often change and the site itself is based on javascript so it cannot be archived. What do you think we should do?-- +++$+++ Hey I just wanted to get your opinion on this, according to [http://www.ilm.com/ Industrial Light & Magic's official webpage] they are working on ''[[The Avengers (2012 film)|The Avengers]]''. I have not found any reliable media outlets reporting it. So my questions is should we wait until one picks it up or try to use the website itself as a source. The problem is websites often change and the site itself is based on javascript so it cannot be archived. What do you think we should do?--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 12:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
6151 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6150 +++$+++ 6150 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.306292940E09 +++$+++ I am going to let Tenebrae decide if we should wait or not since you asked but if I may say something I am sure if it's true we are definitely going to know about it in the future.  +++$+++ :I am going to let Tenebrae decide if we should wait or not since you asked but if I may say something I am sure if it's true we are definitely going to know about it in the future. [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 20:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

263169 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-15 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.268699460E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] ([[User talk:Eubulides|talk]]) 17:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
263170 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263169 +++$+++ 263169 +++$+++ 2010-03-15 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.268701380E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'll look at this after I get home and have had my tea. My first thought is to turn it upside down with the request for help at the top. We're probably going to to get some admin person who won't have the faintest idea what alt-text is and the first thing they'll do is forward it on to someone technical.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I'll look at this after I get home and have had my tea. My first thought is to turn it upside down with the request for help at the top. We're probably going to to get some admin person who won't have the faintest idea what alt-text is and the first thing they'll do is forward it on to someone technical. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
263171 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263169 +++$+++ 263170 +++$+++ 2010-03-15 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.268702940E09 +++$+++ Yes, thanks, good idea.  +++$+++ :: Yes, thanks, good idea. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] ([[User talk:Eubulides|talk]]) 18:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
263172 +++$+++  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263169 +++$+++ 263171 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I've sent them an email. Thanks for your help. 22:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ :::I've sent them an email. Thanks for your help. 22:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

6153 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6153 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-24 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.306292040E09 +++$+++ Hey you wouldn't mind helping out with a FA push with the [[Spider-Man]] article, do you? If so you can  investigate the article see if there is anything that's worth staying and not staying and make sure everything's reliable, I appreciate your work, keep it up. ;)  +++$+++ Hey you wouldn't mind helping out with a FA push with the [[Spider-Man]] article, do you? If so you can  investigate the article see if there is anything that's worth staying and not staying and make sure everything's reliable, I appreciate your work, keep it up. ;) [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 19:54, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
6154 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6153 +++$+++ 6153 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.306534500E09 +++$+++ Hey three paragraphs at the end of the commercial success are uncited. Can you fix that?  +++$+++ :Hey three paragraphs at the end of the commercial success are uncited. Can you fix that? [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 15:15, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

530442 +++$+++ MacMed +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-31 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.243805040E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that, I was told on IRC that it was okay. It won't happen again. Thanks for the heads up, <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ Sorry about that, I was told on IRC that it was okay. It won't happen again. Thanks for the heads up, <font color="green">[[User:MacMed|'''MacMed''']]</font><sup><font color="red">[[User talk:MacMed|talk]]</font></sup><sub><font color="black">[[Special:Contributions/MacMed|stalk]]</font></sub> 14:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
530443 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530442 +++$+++ 530442 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.243853400E09 +++$+++ No problem. I finished out the rest of that round. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :No problem. I finished out the rest of that round. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

6155 +++$+++ Boringbob4wk +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6155 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-27 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.306512720E09 +++$+++ It would appear from the Revision History of [[Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa]] that you engaged in vandalism of that page, that is, making edits based on personal animosity or viewpoint rather than the page content, resulting in a less useful page  and deliberately restoring factual errors which had been corrected.  Although you may have originally had a stylistic difference, you made edits after your requested changes had been implemented that it would seem you had no valid basis to make.  With regard to your experience, you should not need reminding of subst:uw-agfl and subst:uw-npa1. +++$+++ It would appear from the Revision History of [[Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa]] that you engaged in vandalism of that page, that is, making edits based on personal animosity or viewpoint rather than the page content, resulting in a less useful page  and deliberately restoring factual errors which had been corrected.  Although you may have originally had a stylistic difference, you made edits after your requested changes had been implemented that it would seem you had no valid basis to make.  With regard to your experience, you should not need reminding of subst:uw-agfl and subst:uw-npa1.[[User:Boringbob4wk|Boringbob4wk]] ([[User talk:Boringbob4wk|talk]]) 09:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
6156 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6155 +++$+++ 6155 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.306527060E09 +++$+++ My response to this new user's intemperate and inaccurate remarks appear on his talk page and, since he has been deleting it, also at [[Talk:Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa]]. From all indications, I believe the editor above is a [[WP:SOCKPUPPET|meat puppet]] of the anonymous IP who was blocked from the semi-protected page. I'll be pursuing this claim with evidence after work today.-- +++$+++ :My response to this new user's intemperate and inaccurate remarks appear on his talk page and, since he has been deleting it, also at [[Talk:Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa]]. From all indications, I believe the editor above is a [[WP:SOCKPUPPET|meat puppet]] of the anonymous IP who was blocked from the semi-protected page. I'll be pursuing this claim with evidence after work today.--[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 13:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
6157 +++$+++ Gerardw +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6155 +++$+++ 6156 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.306571220E09 +++$+++ I'm confused. I'm only see one edit by Boringbob4wk on his talk page history [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Boringbob4wk&action=history]] and it was an addition, not a removal. Even he had removed the text, that's fine per [[WP:TPG]]. In any event, the discussion about his behavior does not belong on the article talk page, and I'm requesting you remove it from there. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::I'm confused. I'm only see one edit by Boringbob4wk on his talk page history [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Boringbob4wk&action=history]] and it was an addition, not a removal. Even he had removed the text, that's fine per [[WP:TPG]]. In any event, the discussion about his behavior does not belong on the article talk page, and I'm requesting you remove it from there. Thanks. [[User:Gerardw|Gerardw]] ([[User talk:Gerardw|talk]]) 01:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
6158 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6155 +++$+++ 6157 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.306626720E09 +++$+++ As JGreb also noted, you're absolutely correct about my misreading Boringbob4wk's talk page. When I went to add a post the first time, it looked as if my first post had disappeared, and so I re-added it. There may have been an \"Edit conflict\" page in between that confused me. I do take back that assertion. I appreciate that you did note Boring4wk's attacks on me were unwarranted. -- +++$+++ :::As JGreb also noted, you're absolutely correct about my misreading Boringbob4wk's talk page. When I went to add a post the first time, it looked as if my first post had disappeared, and so I re-added it. There may have been an "Edit conflict" page in between that confused me. I do take back that assertion. I appreciate that you did note Boring4wk's attacks on me were unwarranted. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 16:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
6159 +++$+++ Gerardw +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6155 +++$+++ 6155 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.306571220E09 +++$+++ Boringbob4wk, accusing an editor of vandalism because you disagree with the content is a personal attack and not in accordance with Wikipedia's policies, so please stop.  +++$+++ :Boringbob4wk, accusing an editor of vandalism because you disagree with the content is a personal attack and not in accordance with Wikipedia's policies, so please stop. [[User:Gerardw|Gerardw]] ([[User talk:Gerardw|talk]]) 01:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

471573 +++$+++ Uthanc +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-15 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.187176320E09 +++$+++ [[Nazg\xfbl]] currently has movie-based fan art released under the GNU Free Documentation License. Perhaps we should scout for nice exclusively book-based amateur fan art, along the same lines, to use in character, battle and location articles... fidelity to the text would be an issue (i.e. no plate armor). If we actually commission some, I'd even advise the artist(s) to stray from the film visuals as much as possible while still being faithful to the text (i.e. a black or dark brown-haired Legolas, which is certainly possible). (Wrote this first on the project talk)  +++$+++ [[Nazgûl]] currently has movie-based fan art released under the GNU Free Documentation License. Perhaps we should scout for nice exclusively book-based amateur fan art, along the same lines, to use in character, battle and location articles... fidelity to the text would be an issue (i.e. no plate armor). If we actually commission some, I'd even advise the artist(s) to stray from the film visuals as much as possible while still being faithful to the text (i.e. a black or dark brown-haired Legolas, which is certainly possible). (Wrote this first on the project talk) [[User:Uthanc|Uthanc]] 04:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
471574 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471573 +++$+++ 471573 +++$+++ 2007-08-15 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.187186100E09 +++$+++ Saw that, haven't replied yet, sorry. Will reply over there.  +++$+++ :Saw that, haven't replied yet, sorry. Will reply over there. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 06:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
471575 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471573 +++$+++ 471573 +++$+++ 2007-08-15 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.187214300E09 +++$+++ No more than what is in the article. One thing to be careful about is that the father and grandfather have the same names. So it goes: Alexander Karl Otto Westphal (1863-1941), Karl Friedrich Otto Westphal (1833-1890, the father) and Karl Friedrich Otto Westphal (1800-1879, the grandfather). At least according to [http:\/\/www.whonamedit.com\/doctor.cfm\/929.html whonamedit.com]. You may want to find a more reliable source to quote.  +++$+++ :No more than what is in the article. One thing to be careful about is that the father and grandfather have the same names. So it goes: Alexander Karl Otto Westphal (1863-1941), Karl Friedrich Otto Westphal (1833-1890, the father) and Karl Friedrich Otto Westphal (1800-1879, the grandfather). At least according to [http://www.whonamedit.com/doctor.cfm/929.html whonamedit.com]. You may want to find a more reliable source to quote. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 14:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

530445 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-02 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.244008680E09 +++$+++ Oh, and I did drop a line at Fir0002 talk, he may get back to you toward the end of the month - he's taking exams and all right now.  Anyway, not really a wiki-productive post, but just noticed the article and all.  Cheers. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ Oh, and I did drop a line at Fir0002 talk, he may get back to you toward the end of the month - he's taking exams and all right now.  Anyway, not really a wiki-productive post, but just noticed the article and all.  Cheers. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 22:58, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
530446 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530445 +++$+++ 530445 +++$+++ 2009-06-03 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.244023140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for bringing up my situation to Fir0002. I've been reading the manual and learning the knobs on the camera. That plus putting in a HUGE garden has kept me offline. I'm sure the track chasing has had something to do with it too!! I'm studying what my old camera did with speed and f stops. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for bringing up my situation to Fir0002. I've been reading the manual and learning the knobs on the camera. That plus putting in a HUGE garden has kept me offline. I'm sure the track chasing has had something to do with it too!! I'm studying what my old camera did with speed and f stops. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

268303 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-09 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.213055760E09 +++$+++ Just one comment for future reference, since it looks like you make the occasional edit elsewhere: You can say \"'''had''' been collected in the late nineteenth century\", but \"have been\" means it is currently relevant, and so is incompatible with a past date.  +++$+++ Just one comment for future reference, since it looks like you make the occasional edit elsewhere: You can say "'''had''' been collected in the late nineteenth century", but "have been" means it is currently relevant, and so is incompatible with a past date. [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 16:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
268304 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268303 +++$+++ 268303 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.213056180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the comment. I don't understand all of Tony's comments about the article. Also, I don't understand parts of the article, so I appreciate any feedback from you. &ndash; +++$+++ :Thanks for the comment. I don't understand all of Tony's comments about the article. Also, I don't understand parts of the article, so I appreciate any feedback from you. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

268306 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268306 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-10 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.213145940E09 +++$+++ How are you? I was worried when I stopped receiving your email. I thought things got worse! Write to me about your conditions. +++$+++ How are you? I was worried when I stopped receiving your email. I thought things got worse! Write to me about your conditions.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 17:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
268307 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268306 +++$+++ 268306 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.213146120E09 +++$+++ I am just now getting better after weeks of antibiotics. How are you? By the way, thank you for your words as they were most helpful in understanding what was going on. On another subject, I was wondering if I could play \"devil's advocate\" to some of the thoughts in your writing.  &ndash; +++$+++ :I am just now getting better after weeks of antibiotics. How are you? By the way, thank you for your words as they were most helpful in understanding what was going on. On another subject, I was wondering if I could play "devil's advocate" to some of the thoughts in your writing.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
268308 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268306 +++$+++ 268307 +++$+++ 2008-06-11 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.213172520E09 +++$+++ I am always willing to accept any supportive act from you. I trust you. Could you please highlight first how you plan to do such? Is it some interaction in between the two of us or something else? Good to see you recovering!! +++$+++ :: I am always willing to accept any supportive act from you. I trust you. Could you please highlight first how you plan to do such? Is it some interaction in between the two of us or something else? Good to see you recovering!![[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 01:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
268309 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268306 +++$+++ 268308 +++$+++ 2008-06-11 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.213172880E09 +++$+++ I guess I was thinking of asking you some questions about your adjustment hypotheses. However, if you have gmail, it is possible to \"chat\" via real time text with that. Other than that, I am not very sophisticated about internet communication. It is just that I have been thinking about your hypotheses a lot and there are certain roadblocks that I run up against in my mind, even though I basically agree with you.  &ndash; +++$+++ :::I guess I was thinking of asking you some questions about your adjustment hypotheses. However, if you have gmail, it is possible to "chat" via real time text with that. Other than that, I am not very sophisticated about internet communication. It is just that I have been thinking about your hypotheses a lot and there are certain roadblocks that I run up against in my mind, even though I basically agree with you.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
268310 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268306 +++$+++ 268309 +++$+++ 2008-06-11 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.213220880E09 +++$+++ That would be just excellent! But, could it be e-mail in place of instant chat? I have very little scope of continuous internet connection. Actually, I check my e-mail 2 to 3 times a day. Let me know. I will be very glad if we can come to some discussion on the hypotheses! +++$+++ :::: That would be just excellent! But, could it be e-mail in place of instant chat? I have very little scope of continuous internet connection. Actually, I check my e-mail 2 to 3 times a day. Let me know. I will be very glad if we can come to some discussion on the hypotheses![[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 14:48, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
268311 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268306 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-11 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.213228080E09 +++$+++ Fine, I will wait for constructive or any other in depth criticism on my e-mail address. +++$+++ :::::: Fine, I will wait for constructive or any other in depth criticism on my e-mail address.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 16:48, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

6164 +++$+++ Fma12 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-31 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.306894800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Fma12|Fma12]] ([[User talk:Fma12|talk]]) 19:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
6165 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6164 +++$+++ 6164 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.306895520E09 +++$+++ As to my edits: Titles of features are in quote marks. That's simply standard grammar: \"Iron Man\" in ''Tales of Suspense''. Regarding parentheses, we already use them to set off years in this section. Having additional parens doesn't add anything &mdash; they're not necessary here for clarity &mdash; and it seems like overuse. -- +++$+++ :As to my edits: Titles of features are in quote marks. That's simply standard grammar: "Iron Man" in ''Tales of Suspense''. Regarding parentheses, we already use them to set off years in this section. Having additional parens doesn't add anything &mdash; they're not necessary here for clarity &mdash; and it seems like overuse. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 19:32, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
6166 +++$+++ Fma12 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6164 +++$+++ 6165 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.306900920E09 +++$+++ About comics companies, I do not have any tendence to be colloquial (at least, this is not my intention), just didn\xb4t want to be redundant: when the article starts with: \"Comics work includes....\", I thought that listing \"DC Comics\", \"Marvel Comics\", etc, could sound redundant because this is implicit.  +++$+++ ::About comics companies, I do not have any tendence to be colloquial (at least, this is not my intention), just didn´t want to be redundant: when the article starts with: "Comics work includes....", I thought that listing "DC Comics", "Marvel Comics", etc, could sound redundant because this is implicit. [[User:Fma12|Fma12]] ([[User talk:Fma12|talk]]) 21:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
6167 +++$+++ Fma12 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6164 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.306908000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your words. I will keep in mind your experience in comics articles for future consultations . Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for your words. I will keep in mind your experience in comics articles for future consultations . Thanks again. [[User:Fma12|Fma12]] ([[User talk:Fma12|talk]]) 23:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

530455 +++$+++ Gordonrox24 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530455 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-07 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.244360160E09 +++$+++ the move request was successful and the pages have been moved! Thanks for your support.-- +++$+++ the move request was successful and the pages have been moved! Thanks for your support.--[[User:Gordonrox24|gordonrox24]] ([[User talk:Gordonrox24|talk]]) 00:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
530456 +++$+++ Gordonrox24 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530455 +++$+++ 530455 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.244413560E09 +++$+++ It's alright, there was no harm done.-- +++$+++ :It's alright, there was no harm done.--[[User:Gordonrox24|gordonrox24]] ([[User talk:Gordonrox24|talk]]) 15:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

268312 +++$+++ Nil Einne +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268312 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-10 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.213149420E09 +++$+++ I've moved the BLP issue you raised back to [[WP:BLP\/N]] and rather belatedly replied. Cheers  +++$+++ I've moved the BLP issue you raised back to [[WP:BLP/N]] and rather belatedly replied. Cheers [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 18:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
268313 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268312 +++$+++ 268312 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.213151040E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  &ndash; +++$+++ :Thanks!  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

6169 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-02 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.307065680E09 +++$+++ Tenebrae, I disagree with you about an explicit order in the guidelines because I have been involved with many discussions to write them. For example, [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (film)\/Archive 3#Proposed change to \"Distribution\" and \"Reception\" sections of guideline|here]] is one discussion before the primary and secondary groupings. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AManual_of_Style_%28film%29&action=historysubmit&diff=286672973&oldid=286437506 Here], I did the grouping. Here is [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (film)\/Archive 7#Release and reception|another discussion]] about the release-related information, which was a matter of properly dividing and discussing elements within the guidelines. The only discussions of section ordering I could find at [[WT:MOSFILM]] were whether or not plot summaries should come first, which is why I mentioned the rough consensus in favor of first. I see that you just commented on the talk page, and I apologize for my overreaction. Having worked a lot with MOS:FILM and seeing the sectioning, I was thinking, \"Dammit, that's not true, I've seen most of the discussions about the guidelines!\" We'll continue talking on the talk page, but I wanted to clarify where I was coming from in terms of collaboration for the guidelines.  +++$+++ Tenebrae, I disagree with you about an explicit order in the guidelines because I have been involved with many discussions to write them. For example, [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (film)/Archive 3#Proposed change to "Distribution" and "Reception" sections of guideline|here]] is one discussion before the primary and secondary groupings. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AManual_of_Style_%28film%29&action=historysubmit&diff=286672973&oldid=286437506 Here], I did the grouping. Here is [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (film)/Archive 7#Release and reception|another discussion]] about the release-related information, which was a matter of properly dividing and discussing elements within the guidelines. The only discussions of section ordering I could find at [[WT:MOSFILM]] were whether or not plot summaries should come first, which is why I mentioned the rough consensus in favor of first. I see that you just commented on the talk page, and I apologize for my overreaction. Having worked a lot with MOS:FILM and seeing the sectioning, I was thinking, "Dammit, that's not true, I've seen most of the discussions about the guidelines!" We'll continue talking on the talk page, but I wanted to clarify where I was coming from in terms of collaboration for the guidelines. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 18:48, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
6170 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6169 +++$+++ 6169 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.307066580E09 +++$+++ I know, I know... I'm coming on strong about an article about a topic featuring a fighting panda. Whatever disagreements I have, I try to make them solely about the content (but even that can get out of hand). I have nothing against you, of course, I just took issue with the ordering. I actually would prefer little to no guidelines on ordering because while I've enjoyed collaborating on guidelines, films vary too much in coverage to have guidelines on ordering. I see MOS:FILM as more of a lookup of a given element. If you think that the ordering should be recognized more explicitly, I started a discussion at [[WT:MOSFILM]], though it may be a little off-track.  +++$+++ :I know, I know... I'm coming on strong about an article about a topic featuring a fighting panda. Whatever disagreements I have, I try to make them solely about the content (but even that can get out of hand). I have nothing against you, of course, I just took issue with the ordering. I actually would prefer little to no guidelines on ordering because while I've enjoyed collaborating on guidelines, films vary too much in coverage to have guidelines on ordering. I see MOS:FILM as more of a lookup of a given element. If you think that the ordering should be recognized more explicitly, I started a discussion at [[WT:MOSFILM]], though it may be a little off-track. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 19:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

268314 +++$+++ Schrandit +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-12 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.213325280E09 +++$+++ Howdy, you taged an article of mine as unsourced but if you check the bottom there is a link to the text of the resolution at wikisource.  Mind if I take the tag off? -  +++$+++ Howdy, you taged an article of mine as unsourced but if you check the bottom there is a link to the text of the resolution at wikisource.  Mind if I take the tag off? - [[User:Schrandit|Schrandit]] ([[User talk:Schrandit|talk]]) 19:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
268315 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268314 +++$+++ 268314 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.213326480E09 +++$+++ I saw the source as being wikisource but did not think that was enough to satisfy [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] concerns. However, if you feel it does, since I am not sure about wikisource, then it is O.K. with me if you remove the tag. &ndash; +++$+++ :I saw the source as being wikisource but did not think that was enough to satisfy [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] concerns. However, if you feel it does, since I am not sure about wikisource, then it is O.K. with me if you remove the tag. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
268316 +++$+++ Schrandit +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268314 +++$+++ 268315 +++$+++ 2008-06-13 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.213371480E09 +++$+++ In this instance wikisource has lifted the text right from the UN (Which makes said texts availiable for free online) so I think I will remove the tag. -  +++$+++ ::In this instance wikisource has lifted the text right from the UN (Which makes said texts availiable for free online) so I think I will remove the tag. - [[User:Schrandit|Schrandit]] ([[User talk:Schrandit|talk]]) 08:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
268317 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268314 +++$+++ 268316 +++$+++ 2008-06-13 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.213385820E09 +++$+++ O.K.  &ndash; +++$+++ :::O.K.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:37, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

530460 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-10 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.244633340E09 +++$+++ YEA! \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ YEA! — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 04:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
530461 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530460 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.244634600E09 +++$+++ Great find! Excellent\/solid source, lots of information. That should help a lot. I was looking at some NASCAR articles on that article stats viewer. I looks like Dale Earnhardt gets lots of views, lots more than other NASCAR drivers including King Richard. I'm starting to get an itch to work on Big E's article, knowing that the article gets about 1 page view per MINUTE! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :* Great find! Excellent/solid source, lots of information. That should help a lot. I was looking at some NASCAR articles on that article stats viewer. I looks like Dale Earnhardt gets lots of views, lots more than other NASCAR drivers including King Richard. I'm starting to get an itch to work on Big E's article, knowing that the article gets about 1 page view per MINUTE! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
530462 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530460 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.244635020E09 +++$+++ WOW .. I had no idea!  I guess I've been putting that off long enough too ... I'll pick at it here an there when I can.  I've been spending a LOT of time on doing BLP unCat stuff lately, could use a break anyway ;D.  I was even thinking of maybe putting the Rex White and\/or 1952 article up for peer review - what do you think?  Waste of time or not?  \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :::WOW .. I had no idea!  I guess I've been putting that off long enough too ... I'll pick at it here an there when I can.  I've been spending a LOT of time on doing BLP unCat stuff lately, could use a break anyway ;D.  I was even thinking of maybe putting the Rex White and/or 1952 article up for peer review - what do you think?  Waste of time or not?  — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 04:57, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
530463 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530460 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.244635680E09 +++$+++ I found the stats from that article views counter that you mentioned at WP:NASCAR. Speaking of WP:NASCAR, have you officially joined as a member? Members usually add the WikiProject boxes to their userpage to help promote the group. About the peer reviews - I definitely wouldn't for the [[1952 in NASCAR]], it's not near [[WP:GA]]. It might be worth it for [[Rex White]]. If you think it's close, I'll do the first peer review before you list it so that I give my opinion if it's close to GA. I would expect an article for a NASCAR champion to be pretty lengthy and cover their career in depth, including time spent racing on other circuits. With a quick 1 minute glance, I see plenty of unsourced statements that definitely need sourcing. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::I found the stats from that article views counter that you mentioned at WP:NASCAR. Speaking of WP:NASCAR, have you officially joined as a member? Members usually add the WikiProject boxes to their userpage to help promote the group. About the peer reviews - I definitely wouldn't for the [[1952 in NASCAR]], it's not near [[WP:GA]]. It might be worth it for [[Rex White]]. If you think it's close, I'll do the first peer review before you list it so that I give my opinion if it's close to GA. I would expect an article for a NASCAR champion to be pretty lengthy and cover their career in depth, including time spent racing on other circuits. With a quick 1 minute glance, I see plenty of unsourced statements that definitely need sourcing. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
530464 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530460 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.244637300E09 +++$+++ Yea, I saw that Mr Z-man could do that, and I thought it would be great for our NASCAR project, so I just wp:boldly asked him .. lol.  I think I have that little userbox on my To Do page.  Not sure if I actually added my sig. anywhere - but I'll check.  Think I'll hold off on the peer review a bit, but I will look back over the Rex White thing.  I'm pretty sure everything that I added had a source, so it may just be a matter of putting the ref name in places it belongs.  Been a while since I looked at it.  I know I have some more stuff to add too since I got those books and all as well.  I'd like to find some more info on his personal life - wife, kids, etc.  That's not as easy to come by - even in his autobiography (which basically covers his ''career'').  He's supposed to be working on a second book, not sure what the status is on that.  Getting back to the Dale Earnhardt thing too - I did notice it was a high priority on the project page, so I will start working on that.  Still stuff in the Pole article as well.  I don't think we'll run out of things to do any time soon ... LOL!!! \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :::::Yea, I saw that Mr Z-man could do that, and I thought it would be great for our NASCAR project, so I just wp:boldly asked him .. lol.  I think I have that little userbox on my To Do page.  Not sure if I actually added my sig. anywhere - but I'll check.  Think I'll hold off on the peer review a bit, but I will look back over the Rex White thing.  I'm pretty sure everything that I added had a source, so it may just be a matter of putting the ref name in places it belongs.  Been a while since I looked at it.  I know I have some more stuff to add too since I got those books and all as well.  I'd like to find some more info on his personal life - wife, kids, etc.  That's not as easy to come by - even in his autobiography (which basically covers his ''career'').  He's supposed to be working on a second book, not sure what the status is on that.  Getting back to the Dale Earnhardt thing too - I did notice it was a high priority on the project page, so I will start working on that.  Still stuff in the Pole article as well.  I don't think we'll run out of things to do any time soon ... LOL!!! — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 05:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

6173 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-09 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.307653260E09 +++$+++ Didn't mean to revert your edits, I hit the rollback button by mistake. That's the trouble with editing Wikipedia with an IPad.-- +++$+++ Didn't mean to revert your edits, I hit the rollback button by mistake. That's the trouble with editing Wikipedia with an IPad.--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 14:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
6174 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6173 +++$+++ 6173 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.307673360E09 +++$+++ It is pretty cool but the touch navigation can be a bit troublesome as you can see.-- +++$+++ :It is pretty cool but the touch navigation can be a bit troublesome as you can see.--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 19:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

268318 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-17 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.213691520E09 +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse!  On 10 March 2008, you suggested a merge between [[psychological adaptation]][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Psychological_adaptation&diff=197219469&oldid=161760381] and [[evolved psychological mechanism]][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Evolved_psychological_mechanism&diff=197219656&oldid=175273721], but you didn't use the \"mergeinto\" or \"mergefrom\" tags, so it's unclear as to which article should be merged.  Could you take a moment to revisit the issue or comment here or on the talk pages?  Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse!  On 10 March 2008, you suggested a merge between [[psychological adaptation]][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Psychological_adaptation&diff=197219469&oldid=161760381] and [[evolved psychological mechanism]][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evolved_psychological_mechanism&diff=197219656&oldid=175273721], but you didn't use the "mergeinto" or "mergefrom" tags, so it's unclear as to which article should be merged.  Could you take a moment to revisit the issue or comment here or on the talk pages?  Thanks. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 01:32, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
268319 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268318 +++$+++ 268318 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.213694160E09 +++$+++ Hi! They seem like the same article, so it all depends on what the ultimate \"best name\" for the article is. And on that, as this moment, I have no opinion although I can think about it tomorrow if you like. &ndash; +++$+++ :Hi! They seem like the same article, so it all depends on what the ultimate "best name" for the article is. And on that, as this moment, I have no opinion although I can think about it tomorrow if you like. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
268320 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268318 +++$+++ 268319 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.213695120E09 +++$+++ Great!  There's no time frame.  How are things?  +++$+++ ::Great!  There's no time frame.  How are things? [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 02:32, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
268321 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268318 +++$+++ 268320 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.213695960E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm still experiencing the sequalae of my so-called \"seizure\". Got my bill from Maui Memorial yesterday. Actually, I don't care. Onward and upward! &ndash; +++$+++ :::Well, I'm still experiencing the sequalae of my so-called "seizure". Got my bill from Maui Memorial yesterday. Actually, I don't care. Onward and upward! &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
268322 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268318 +++$+++ 268321 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.213696560E09 +++$+++ I'm very sorry to hear that.  I can't imagine the bill considering that MMMC is twice the average cost of medical care on the mainland.  Let me know if there is anything I can do for you in regards to Wikipedia-related tasks.  If you need my help, feel free to contact me.   +++$+++ ::::I'm very sorry to hear that.  I can't imagine the bill considering that MMMC is twice the average cost of medical care on the mainland.  Let me know if there is anything I can do for you in regards to Wikipedia-related tasks.  If you need my help, feel free to contact me.  [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 02:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
268323 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268318 +++$+++ 268322 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.213734780E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your thoughts. (The people at Maui Memorial were very nice.) Regarding the article merge, I recommend going with [[Psychological adaptation]] as the article title because it has more direct page links to it. Also it is less like jargon, the [[Evolved psychological mechanism]] apparently having been coined by one man, Buss, and I see no evidence that it has become a generally accepted term. Hope this helps.  &ndash; +++$+++ :::::Thank you for your thoughts. (The people at Maui Memorial were very nice.) Regarding the article merge, I recommend going with [[Psychological adaptation]] as the article title because it has more direct page links to it. Also it is less like jargon, the [[Evolved psychological mechanism]] apparently having been coined by one man, Buss, and I see no evidence that it has become a generally accepted term. Hope this helps.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
268324 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268318 +++$+++ 268323 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.213770480E09 +++$+++ Ok, thank you for revisiting the issue.  Please get well soon.  +++$+++ ::::::Ok, thank you for revisiting the issue.  Please get well soon. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 23:28, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

6176 +++$+++ Charitard +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6176 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.307875920E09 +++$+++ Hi Tenebrae, thanks for your edits on the [[Allison Kugel]] page; now that I step back and look at my contributions there, having the massive section on the interviews was probably serious overkill, so you were spot on. I read it a few times, and think the way you shortened it down has taken away any of the \"resume\"-like aspects of the page, and I've made sure that none of the remaining text sounds puffed up. Would you agree it now fits the criteria to remove the maintenance tag at the top? I don't feel it's my place to remove the tag myself, since it's a largely critique of my contributions, but I'm not a fan of leaving them floating around either, once the changes are up. Cheers, and happy editing  +++$+++ Hi Tenebrae, thanks for your edits on the [[Allison Kugel]] page; now that I step back and look at my contributions there, having the massive section on the interviews was probably serious overkill, so you were spot on. I read it a few times, and think the way you shortened it down has taken away any of the "resume"-like aspects of the page, and I've made sure that none of the remaining text sounds puffed up. Would you agree it now fits the criteria to remove the maintenance tag at the top? I don't feel it's my place to remove the tag myself, since it's a largely critique of my contributions, but I'm not a fan of leaving them floating around either, once the changes are up. Cheers, and happy editing [[User:Charitard|Charitard]] ([[User talk:Charitard|talk]]) 03:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
6177 +++$+++ Charitard +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6176 +++$+++ 6176 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.307925900E09 +++$+++ Hi Tenebrae, thanks for getting back to me so promptly, and yes, it is a small wikiworld :). I agree with removing the blurbs about the PR company on the [[Allison Kugel]] entry, so you were right again there. However, looking at the page, I think there were a small handful of interviews (not the massive list that was there before) that were notable and would appropriate to briefly mention on the page (largely an interview with [[Jenna Jameson]] and a few interviews with political figures). Mainly the Wiki precedent I'm using is the [[David Frost]], [[Katie Couric]], [[Matt Lauer]], and [[Tom Brokaw]] pages, which briefly mention their key celebrity interviews in the text (not the intros though). I created a [[User:Charitard\/AKpara|small paragraph]], would you mind glancing it over and letting me know if you agree it's appropriate or not? Thanks again,  +++$+++ :Hi Tenebrae, thanks for getting back to me so promptly, and yes, it is a small wikiworld :). I agree with removing the blurbs about the PR company on the [[Allison Kugel]] entry, so you were right again there. However, looking at the page, I think there were a small handful of interviews (not the massive list that was there before) that were notable and would appropriate to briefly mention on the page (largely an interview with [[Jenna Jameson]] and a few interviews with political figures). Mainly the Wiki precedent I'm using is the [[David Frost]], [[Katie Couric]], [[Matt Lauer]], and [[Tom Brokaw]] pages, which briefly mention their key celebrity interviews in the text (not the intros though). I created a [[User:Charitard/AKpara|small paragraph]], would you mind glancing it over and letting me know if you agree it's appropriate or not? Thanks again, [[User:Charitard|Charitard]] ([[User talk:Charitard|talk]]) 17:45, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
6178 +++$+++ Charitard +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6176 +++$+++ 6177 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.307940480E09 +++$+++ Right on, thanks for the feedback!  +++$+++ ::Right on, thanks for the feedback! [[User:Charitard|Charitard]] ([[User talk:Charitard|talk]]) 21:48, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

481627 +++$+++ Arniep +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481627 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-31 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.136094720E09 +++$+++ Hi, in your comment your said you find some useless, I assume that means you only want to keep the prematurely deceased cat? Could you update your comment if that is the case at [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion\/Log\/2005_December_29#Category:Entertainers_who_died_aged_x_etc._categories]]. Thanks  +++$+++ Hi, in your comment your said you find some useless, I assume that means you only want to keep the prematurely deceased cat? Could you update your comment if that is the case at [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_December_29#Category:Entertainers_who_died_aged_x_etc._categories]]. Thanks [[User:Arniep|Arniep]] 21:52, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
481628 +++$+++ Arniep +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481627 +++$+++ 481627 +++$+++ 2005-12-31 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.136097120E09 +++$+++ It looks like all the categories may be kept due to lack of consensus. If you find some of those categories useless please state which ones then we can at least get them deleted. Thanks  +++$+++ :It looks like all the categories may be kept due to lack of consensus. If you find some of those categories useless please state which ones then we can at least get them deleted. Thanks [[User:Arniep|Arniep]] 22:32, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
481629 +++$+++ Arniep +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481627 +++$+++ 481627 +++$+++ 2005-12-31 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.136098800E09 +++$+++ Hi, can you say what you said to me on the cfd page above. Thanks  +++$+++ :Hi, can you say what you said to me on the cfd page above. Thanks [[User:Arniep|Arniep]] 23:00, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

268325 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268325 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-18 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.213781520E09 +++$+++ Yes, they are mostly from the UK, Australia, and New Zealand.  I'm not sure, but it's possible that some editors in Canada might use the expression, but in my personal experience that has not been the case.  I've also noticed that many Europeans use the expression as well.  +++$+++ Yes, they are mostly from the UK, Australia, and New Zealand.  I'm not sure, but it's possible that some editors in Canada might use the expression, but in my personal experience that has not been the case.  I've also noticed that many Europeans use the expression as well. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 02:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
268326 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268325 +++$+++ 268325 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.213782420E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I suspected something like that. I don't know why but I find it irritating. Of course, that is unreasonable and I will try to suppress that feeling, especially knowing that origin is purely national.  &ndash; +++$+++ :Thanks! I suspected something like that. I don't know why but I find it irritating. Of course, that is unreasonable and I will try to suppress that feeling, especially knowing that origin is purely national.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
268327 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268325 +++$+++ 268326 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.213782780E09 +++$+++ Well, in my experience, when someone uses the term in the context of signing their edits, it is equivalent to saying \"sincerely\", \"thanks\" or even \"have a great day\".  That's it, really.  Anything that greases the wheels of civility is probably a [[Good Thing and Bad Thing|Good Thing]], but I bet your problem comes from people using it who may ''not'' be sincere - am I right?  +++$+++ ::Well, in my experience, when someone uses the term in the context of signing their edits, it is equivalent to saying "sincerely", "thanks" or even "have a great day".  That's it, really.  Anything that greases the wheels of civility is probably a [[Good Thing and Bad Thing|Good Thing]], but I bet your problem comes from people using it who may ''not'' be sincere - am I right? [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 02:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
268328 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268325 +++$+++ 268327 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.213825740E09 +++$+++ What bothered me, for example,  is when it is a sign off to a harsh criticism. It seemed inappropriately flippant. But looking at it as \"greasing the wheels of civility\" is a helpful perspective. (I have gotten tired of the institutionalization of \"have a nice day\". I must be a grouch.) Cheers! &ndash; +++$+++ ::: What bothered me, for example,  is when it is a sign off to a harsh criticism. It seemed inappropriately flippant. But looking at it as "greasing the wheels of civility" is a helpful perspective. (I have gotten tired of the institutionalization of "have a nice day". I must be a grouch.) Cheers! &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:49, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
268329 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268325 +++$+++ 268328 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.213837080E09 +++$+++ Yes, you're right.  It does seem out of place if the tone of the criticism is harsh.  +++$+++ ::::Yes, you're right.  It does seem out of place if the tone of the criticism is harsh. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 17:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

6183 +++$+++ Darkwarriorblake +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-26 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.309156140E09 +++$+++ Your recent change to the GL article about comparing it to other films.  I haven't seen any comparisons to Xmen but a lot of outlets have been comparing its performance to that of Thor which is the only other big super hero original film (not a sequel or prequel) this year.  So I think the comparison is pretty useful since a lot of professionals are making it.  Or as you mention, a direct comparison to a competing film.  I did the same with Fast Five and Thor which were released at the same time in the same areas effectively in direct competition worldwide for the number one spot, again a comparison a lot of the analysis sites made.  Just my 2 cents.  +++$+++ Your recent change to the GL article about comparing it to other films.  I haven't seen any comparisons to Xmen but a lot of outlets have been comparing its performance to that of Thor which is the only other big super hero original film (not a sequel or prequel) this year.  So I think the comparison is pretty useful since a lot of professionals are making it.  Or as you mention, a direct comparison to a competing film.  I did the same with Fast Five and Thor which were released at the same time in the same areas effectively in direct competition worldwide for the number one spot, again a comparison a lot of the analysis sites made.  Just my 2 cents. [[User:Darkwarriorblake|Darkwarriorblake]] ([[User talk:Darkwarriorblake|talk]]) 23:29, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
6184 +++$+++ Darkwarriorblake +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6183 +++$+++ 6183 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.309157100E09 +++$+++ Was it a personal comparison?  Maybe I misread it, I thought it was comparing box office performance.  Like I wouldn't compare Fast Five to the Hangover Part II.  I kept the comparison to Thor because that was what a lot of the sources I was using were including and it made sense for the time as they were the only two big films out released in direct competition, weekend to weekend with marginally overlapping audiences.  I'd only do it with Thor in the sense that a good comparison is being made, not just week by week numbers but if there was a significant difference between opening weekend numbers between the two, each being a first film for each superhero from competing agencies, I think that would be an interesting note.  I can't make a comment on it vs. Super 8 as I haven't followed that film and do not know what kind of competition, if any, they had and I don't think any articles I've read have made that comparison either.  I'm fairly sure no one has made comparisons to X-Men either, just Thor, so you're probably right not to mention X-Men in the article (again unless a noteworthy comparison comes up.  I unfortunately cannot get involved in the article at the moment as I'm on a tight deadline for a project.  If I remember when I am done, I will try to add something significant to the article.  +++$+++ :Was it a personal comparison?  Maybe I misread it, I thought it was comparing box office performance.  Like I wouldn't compare Fast Five to the Hangover Part II.  I kept the comparison to Thor because that was what a lot of the sources I was using were including and it made sense for the time as they were the only two big films out released in direct competition, weekend to weekend with marginally overlapping audiences.  I'd only do it with Thor in the sense that a good comparison is being made, not just week by week numbers but if there was a significant difference between opening weekend numbers between the two, each being a first film for each superhero from competing agencies, I think that would be an interesting note.  I can't make a comment on it vs. Super 8 as I haven't followed that film and do not know what kind of competition, if any, they had and I don't think any articles I've read have made that comparison either.  I'm fairly sure no one has made comparisons to X-Men either, just Thor, so you're probably right not to mention X-Men in the article (again unless a noteworthy comparison comes up.  I unfortunately cannot get involved in the article at the moment as I'm on a tight deadline for a project.  If I remember when I am done, I will try to add something significant to the article. [[User:Darkwarriorblake|Darkwarriorblake]] ([[User talk:Darkwarriorblake|talk]]) 23:45, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
6185 +++$+++ Darkwarriorblake +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6183 +++$+++ 6184 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.309157940E09 +++$+++ I'm not fond of the wording on that excerpt anyway as it makes it sound like it opened directly against Thor and X-Men.  I think a comparison should be made as it helps give an indication of how it performed against other fare.  Was it a bad week or was it just a badly performing film?  But you're right, perhaps it is a discussion that should b e made in the article talk page for more input.  +++$+++ ::I'm not fond of the wording on that excerpt anyway as it makes it sound like it opened directly against Thor and X-Men.  I think a comparison should be made as it helps give an indication of how it performed against other fare.  Was it a bad week or was it just a badly performing film?  But you're right, perhaps it is a discussion that should b e made in the article talk page for more input. [[User:Darkwarriorblake|Darkwarriorblake]] ([[User talk:Darkwarriorblake|talk]]) 23:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
6186 +++$+++ Darkwarriorblake +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6183 +++$+++ 6185 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.309662240E09 +++$+++ Further discussion, I just noticed this on Box Office Mojo.  Compares the comic-based films of the year, so films in the same genre basically.  Don't know if any of that is of interest to you.  http:\/\/boxofficemojo.com\/showdowns\/chart\/?id=summer11comicvs.htm Probably be more interesting when the last of hte films has come out.  +++$+++ :::Further discussion, I just noticed this on Box Office Mojo.  Compares the comic-based films of the year, so films in the same genre basically.  Don't know if any of that is of interest to you.  http://boxofficemojo.com/showdowns/chart/?id=summer11comicvs.htm Probably be more interesting when the last of hte films has come out. [[User:Darkwarriorblake|Darkwarriorblake]] ([[User talk:Darkwarriorblake|talk]]) 20:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

268330 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-20 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.213945800E09 +++$+++ Sorry!  I didn't realize that you were still working.  I did a bit of formatting, but I'll stay out of the article until you're finished.  Great work!  --  +++$+++ Sorry!  I didn't realize that you were still working.  I did a bit of formatting, but I'll stay out of the article until you're finished.  Great work!  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 00:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
268331 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268330 +++$+++ 268330 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.213946400E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I am finished.  Go right ahead and do what you want to do. I may have made some errors in the article, so feel free to change what is wrong. &ndash; +++$+++ :Thanks! I am finished.  Go right ahead and do what you want to do. I may have made some errors in the article, so feel free to change what is wrong. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

6187 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6187 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-27 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.309227180E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 19:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
6188 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6187 +++$+++ 6187 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309228440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the input, [http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0280267\/ Jeremy Fitzgerald] according to IMDB is a credited stuntman on the film. There are several other outlets reporting this incident but they are all just regurgitating the TMZ story.-- +++$+++ :Thanks for the input, [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0280267/ Jeremy Fitzgerald] according to IMDB is a credited stuntman on the film. There are several other outlets reporting this incident but they are all just regurgitating the TMZ story.--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 19:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
6189 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6187 +++$+++ 6188 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309232040E09 +++$+++ That too, I think I might add it but just indicate the info came from TMZ.-- +++$+++ ::That too, I think I might add it but just indicate the info came from TMZ.--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 20:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

530477 +++$+++ Bobak +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-20 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.245501060E09 +++$+++ Hi!  So as I was planning the route back home on a road trip (which I'm on right now), I was taking into account where I could take Wikipedia photos along the way. I then noticed you covered a huge chunk of the places I would visit (towns and universities) and took the photos I would take (key buildings, town halls, etc) --very impressive.  Its nice to see another who's into these sorts of dorky \"scavenger hunts\" that some of us play.  There are a few of us in Minnesota, and I try to hit towns on my own road trips (but sometimes, depending on my company, they're not as patient to stop in every little town to take a photo of a town hall).  I guess its just in the blood of some of us :-)  All the best.  -- +++$+++ Hi!  So as I was planning the route back home on a road trip (which I'm on right now), I was taking into account where I could take Wikipedia photos along the way. I then noticed you covered a huge chunk of the places I would visit (towns and universities) and took the photos I would take (key buildings, town halls, etc) --very impressive.  Its nice to see another who's into these sorts of dorky "scavenger hunts" that some of us play.  There are a few of us in Minnesota, and I try to hit towns on my own road trips (but sometimes, depending on my company, they're not as patient to stop in every little town to take a photo of a town hall).  I guess its just in the blood of some of us :-)  All the best.  --[[User:Bobak|Bobak]] ([[User talk:Bobak|talk]]) 05:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
530478 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530477 +++$+++ 530477 +++$+++ 2009-06-20 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.245523260E09 +++$+++ I love going to car races all around the eastern half of Wisconsin and I take some day trips. The races used to often be solo trips, so that's where I got my best opportunity for photos. If it's easy and I have a little time, I'll take photos of things along the way. Please take photos when you're driving because I'm sure there's a lot that I have missed and plenty of places that I didn't happen to drive by. I've apparently gotten good with sheer repetition and repeating what situations worked, because my pictures usually score well on google and yahoo images. I don't know anyone else who's doing these \"scavenger hunts\" in Wisconsin, although there are some who took the photos of communities around their locale. I've taken few photographs in the western half of the state (west of [[Interstate 39]]) except in the eastern part of the BEAUTIFUL [[Driftless Area]]. Thank you for your awesome comments and I'm glad you feel like a kindred spirit! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I love going to car races all around the eastern half of Wisconsin and I take some day trips. The races used to often be solo trips, so that's where I got my best opportunity for photos. If it's easy and I have a little time, I'll take photos of things along the way. Please take photos when you're driving because I'm sure there's a lot that I have missed and plenty of places that I didn't happen to drive by. I've apparently gotten good with sheer repetition and repeating what situations worked, because my pictures usually score well on google and yahoo images. I don't know anyone else who's doing these "scavenger hunts" in Wisconsin, although there are some who took the photos of communities around their locale. I've taken few photographs in the western half of the state (west of [[Interstate 39]]) except in the eastern part of the BEAUTIFUL [[Driftless Area]]. Thank you for your awesome comments and I'm glad you feel like a kindred spirit! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 11:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
530479 +++$+++ Bobak +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530477 +++$+++ 530478 +++$+++ 2009-06-21 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.245634440E09 +++$+++ You're definitely right about most people taking photos in their own locale.  Heh, actually I did a run through NW Wisconsin a few years ago, which is coincidentally where the image used in the [[National Fresh Water Fishing Hall of Fame]] came from. I didn't initially put two and two together (that you had recently asked me about the photo) when I posted the above comment --I was just planning my route from a hotel in Michigan when I noticed all the towns you'd covered.  -- +++$+++ ::You're definitely right about most people taking photos in their own locale.  Heh, actually I did a run through NW Wisconsin a few years ago, which is coincidentally where the image used in the [[National Fresh Water Fishing Hall of Fame]] came from. I didn't initially put two and two together (that you had recently asked me about the photo) when I posted the above comment --I was just planning my route from a hotel in Michigan when I noticed all the towns you'd covered.  --[[User:Bobak|Bobak]] ([[User talk:Bobak|talk]]) 18:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
530480 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530477 +++$+++ 530479 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.245666000E09 +++$+++ You have an interesting route between Michigan & Minnesota if you're traveling through areas that I photographed! I'm sure there's some that I hit, but I missed most of it! Yes, I did know that you took the picture for the National Fresh Water Fishing Hall of Fame. I drove past it about 10 years ago and wasn't impressed at that time, but I've love to see it now! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::You have an interesting route between Michigan & Minnesota if you're traveling through areas that I photographed! I'm sure there's some that I hit, but I missed most of it! Yes, I did know that you took the picture for the National Fresh Water Fishing Hall of Fame. I drove past it about 10 years ago and wasn't impressed at that time, but I've love to see it now! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

268334 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-20 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.213981080E09 +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse.  Sure, let's talk by e-mail.  I'll send you one tomorrow; please look for it. :-)  +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse.  Sure, let's talk by e-mail.  I'll send you one tomorrow; please look for it. :-) [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 09:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
268335 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268334 +++$+++ 268334 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.213994760E09 +++$+++ Message sent.  Let me know if you didn't get it.  +++$+++ :Message sent.  Let me know if you didn't get it. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 13:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
268336 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268334 +++$+++ 268335 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.213998480E09 +++$+++ Replied.  &ndash; +++$+++ ::Replied.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

6191 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6191 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-02 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.309658280E09 +++$+++ This is a invitation to join [[Template:DC Comics films#animated films|here]] if you don't mind. :)  +++$+++ This is a invitation to join [[Template:DC Comics films#animated films|here]] if you don't mind. :) [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 18:58, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
6192 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6191 +++$+++ 6191 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.309673520E09 +++$+++ Sorry I had linked it wrong. I mean will you please join the discussion page with the latest discussion.  +++$+++ :Sorry I had linked it wrong. I mean will you please join the discussion page with the latest discussion. [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 23:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

6193 +++$+++ Monkeys 9711 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309832280E09 +++$+++ Hello Tenebrae, since we have agreed to place a semi protection lock on Kung Fu Panda 2, could you possibly explain to me how this is done, because I have no idea how to do it. Thanks  +++$+++ Hello Tenebrae, since we have agreed to place a semi protection lock on Kung Fu Panda 2, could you possibly explain to me how this is done, because I have no idea how to do it. Thanks [[User:Monkeys 9711|Monkeys 9711]] ([[User talk:Monkeys 9711|talk]]) 19:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
6194 +++$+++ Monkeys 9711 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6193 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310100900E09 +++$+++ Okay thank you for all your help I will follow the directions you gave me :)  +++$+++ ::Okay thank you for all your help I will follow the directions you gave me :) [[User:Monkeys 9711|Monkeys 9711]] ([[User talk:Monkeys 9711|talk]]) 21:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
6195 +++$+++ Monkeys 9711 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6193 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310189040E09 +++$+++ Hello, hate to bother you again, but you seem to know a lot about this particular category, and may I just ask if I have done this correctly.. again? haha.. see the requests for semi protection page (you probably already know that)  +++$+++ :::Hello, hate to bother you again, but you seem to know a lot about this particular category, and may I just ask if I have done this correctly.. again? haha.. see the requests for semi protection page (you probably already know that) [[User:Monkeys 9711|Monkeys 9711]] ([[User talk:Monkeys 9711|talk]]) 22:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

268339 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-10 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.213096380E09 +++$+++ I have been exceedingly patient with you throughout months of attacks on my talk page; please stop.  You are no longer welcome on my talk page, and further attacks will be removed.   +++$+++ I have been exceedingly patient with you throughout months of attacks on my talk page; please stop.  You are no longer welcome on my talk page, and further attacks will be removed.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 04:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
268340 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-22 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.214119380E09 +++$+++ <copied from [[User talk:Viriditas]].   +++$+++ ::<copied from [[User talk:Viriditas]].  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

6196 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310429760E09 +++$+++ I see you're having difficulties with User:205.209.83.211 on Masterchef.  I've been dealing with him\/her on an assortment of similar articles, largely related to his\/her refusal to use edit summaries, and his\/her \"my way or the highway\" approach to editing.  Do you think a referral to AN:I is in order?  He\/she seems to skate just this side of a block for 3RR or other edit warring, but never makes an effort to change his\/her behavior.  You got them to reply on a talk page, and I think that's a first.   +++$+++ I see you're having difficulties with User:205.209.83.211 on Masterchef.  I've been dealing with him/her on an assortment of similar articles, largely related to his/her refusal to use edit summaries, and his/her "my way or the highway" approach to editing.  Do you think a referral to AN:I is in order?  He/she seems to skate just this side of a block for 3RR or other edit warring, but never makes an effort to change his/her behavior.  You got them to reply on a talk page, and I think that's a first.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 17:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
6197 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6196 +++$+++ 6196 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310451180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the speedy reply!  Great working with you, too.  This editor has been working my last nerve for the last few months, and I'm ready make a move to get him\/her to knock it off.  Part of the problem seems to be his\/her English, but I have limited sympathy at best for that when he\/she refuses to do anything to improve his\/her editing (my kingdom for a gender-neutral pronoun!)  What's our first move?   +++$+++ : Thanks for the speedy reply!  Great working with you, too.  This editor has been working my last nerve for the last few months, and I'm ready make a move to get him/her to knock it off.  Part of the problem seems to be his/her English, but I have limited sympathy at best for that when he/she refuses to do anything to improve his/her editing (my kingdom for a gender-neutral pronoun!)  What's our first move?  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 23:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
6198 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6196 +++$+++ 6197 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310452920E09 +++$+++ Good, we're on the same page.  I've gone around with this editor several times, and do find when they're on notice, they do pull back, albeit temporarily (and with a bit of attitude), but as soon as we're not watching, old habits pop up.  I find keeping an eye on him\/her is the best way to go.  Assuming good faith can be tricky with editors such as these, I will admit.   +++$+++ :: Good, we're on the same page.  I've gone around with this editor several times, and do find when they're on notice, they do pull back, albeit temporarily (and with a bit of attitude), but as soon as we're not watching, old habits pop up.  I find keeping an eye on him/her is the best way to go.  Assuming good faith can be tricky with editors such as these, I will admit.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 23:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

268341 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-22 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.214119080E09 +++$+++ You never answered my question about en dashes. An now it has come up again. The link to [[en dash]] does not, for me, answer the question of when a hyphen is not the same thing as an endash (which the FAC people seem to infer that sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't). In their actions they (the FAC people)  often, but not always, act as if they really mean hyphen and  get angry if en dashes are put in.  Could you explain to me the situations in which a hyphen vs. a html en dash is used? I think there is a third type of dash that SG alluded to. I would so much appreciate it. This issue prompted the first SG public attack on me as well as the second, and I still don't get it.  Please help me understand. Regards, &ndash; +++$+++ You never answered my question about en dashes. An now it has come up again. The link to [[en dash]] does not, for me, answer the question of when a hyphen is not the same thing as an endash (which the FAC people seem to infer that sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't). In their actions they (the FAC people)  often, but not always, act as if they really mean hyphen and  get angry if en dashes are put in.  Could you explain to me the situations in which a hyphen vs. a html en dash is used? I think there is a third type of dash that SG alluded to. I would so much appreciate it. This issue prompted the first SG public attack on me as well as the second, and I still don't get it.  Please help me understand. Regards, &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
268342 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268341 +++$+++ 268341 +++$+++ 2008-06-22 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.214119260E09 +++$+++ Public attack ?  Please take great care in the allegations you make about me, Mattisse.  Dashes are fully explained at the two links I gave you ''then'':  [[Dash]] and [[WP:DASH]].  If you have further questions about them, you're welcome to ask them on the appropriate talk pages. You aren't welcome to [[Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates\/Eric Brewer (ice hockey)|disrupt FACs]] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship\/Epbr123_2#Oppose RFAs] with unfounded charges.    +++$+++ : Public attack ?  Please take great care in the allegations you make about me, Mattisse.  Dashes are fully explained at the two links I gave you ''then'':  [[Dash]] and [[WP:DASH]].  If you have further questions about them, you're welcome to ask them on the appropriate talk pages. You aren't welcome to [[Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Eric Brewer (ice hockey)|disrupt FACs]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Epbr123_2#Oppose RFAs] with unfounded charges.   [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

6199 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.310465820E09 +++$+++ He\/she just did that weird edit on Just Desserts again.  I tagged his\/her talk page with a Level 3 vandalism warning, and I'm going to check to see if we have a 3RR violation.   +++$+++ He/she just did that weird edit on Just Desserts again.  I tagged his/her talk page with a Level 3 vandalism warning, and I'm going to check to see if we have a 3RR violation.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 03:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
6200 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6199 +++$+++ 6199 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310516940E09 +++$+++ And a fourth time this morning!  I called his\/her bluff, and have posted a notice on the vandalism noticeboard. Let's see what they do.  +++$+++ : And a fourth time this morning!  I called his/her bluff, and have posted a notice on the vandalism noticeboard. Let's see what they do. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 17:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
6201 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6199 +++$+++ 6200 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310517720E09 +++$+++ Thanks, buddy!  The editor seemed to be daring us with that latest group of edits, so there was no choice but to make the report.   +++$+++ :: Thanks, buddy!  The editor seemed to be daring us with that latest group of edits, so there was no choice but to make the report.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 17:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

268346 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-25 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.214432520E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I'm sorry if you are having problems reading your own talk page, but it you continue to make unfounded statements about me, this isn't going to end well.  I suggest you keep your issues on your own talk page and discuss them here.   +++$+++ Mattisse, I'm sorry if you are having problems reading your own talk page, but it you continue to make unfounded statements about me, this isn't going to end well.  I suggest you keep your issues on your own talk page and discuss them here.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
268347 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268346 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-25 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.214427720E09 +++$+++ That is a different comment made on June 10. She must have  removed her tirade made a few days ago, the one she was making in the midst of my attempting to post to you on June 22. I guess this page is on her watchlist and she watches any comment made from me to you, including this one. &ndash; +++$+++ :::::That is a different comment made on June 10. She must have  removed her tirade made a few days ago, the one she was making in the midst of my attempting to post to you on June 22. I guess this page is on her watchlist and she watches any comment made from me to you, including this one. &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
268348 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268346 +++$+++ 268346 +++$+++ 2008-06-25 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.214432520E09 +++$+++ Tirade?  The conversation is right here on your own talk page where it belongs.  And the conversation about dashes is at [[WT:MOS#Query]], where it belongs.  If you have problems understanding dashes, that is the place to ask your questions and follow up.   +++$+++ : Tirade?  The conversation is right here on your own talk page where it belongs.  And the conversation about dashes is at [[WT:MOS#Query]], where it belongs.  If you have problems understanding dashes, that is the place to ask your questions and follow up.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
268349 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268346 +++$+++ 268348 +++$+++ 2008-06-25 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.214434080E09 +++$+++ I'm flattered that you read my every word and feel that you must reply, even to stray comments made by me on the talk pages of others! I must be important! &ndash; +++$+++ ::I'm flattered that you read my every word and feel that you must reply, even to stray comments made by me on the talk pages of others! I must be important! &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:48, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
268350 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268346 +++$+++ 268349 +++$+++ 2008-06-25 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.214434380E09 +++$+++ Actually, I'm not flattered. It's getting tiresome, this fixation of yours on my every slipup. But of course, you may have the last word.  &ndash; +++$+++ :::Actually, I'm not flattered. It's getting tiresome, this fixation of yours on my every slipup. But of course, you may have the last word.  &ndash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

6203 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.310536680E09 +++$+++ Hey, buddy.  Go have a look at [[User:Worstcook]] who suddenly went active today.  Sock puppet?  +++$+++ Hey, buddy.  Go have a look at [[User:Worstcook]] who suddenly went active today.  Sock puppet? [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 22:58, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
6204 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6203 +++$+++ 6203 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.310539860E09 +++$+++ Go for it with the sock report.  I think it's best coming from both an experienced editor and another voice.Thanks!  +++$+++ : Go for it with the sock report.  I think it's best coming from both an experienced editor and another voice.Thanks! [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 23:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
6205 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6203 +++$+++ 6204 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310549340E09 +++$+++ Nice job.  Cirt seems to be one of the more diligent admins.  Hopefully that will take care of the sock.  Check out [[List of The Great Food Truck Race episodes]] if you have any lingering doubt about this being a sock.   +++$+++ :: Nice job.  Cirt seems to be one of the more diligent admins.  Hopefully that will take care of the sock.  Check out [[List of The Great Food Truck Race episodes]] if you have any lingering doubt about this being a sock.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 02:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

569013 +++$+++ Dan Carkner +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-26 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.161926340E09 +++$+++ I am going to restart the article.  I just went for supper, give me some time, heh heh!  He ''is'' notable, mostly for his photography, he has taken promotional pictures of bands such as [[Green Day]], [[Fugazi]], and pretty much any north american punk band from the last 15 years.   Give me a chance to put some sources..  +++$+++ I am going to restart the article.  I just went for supper, give me some time, heh heh!  He ''is'' notable, mostly for his photography, he has taken promotional pictures of bands such as [[Green Day]], [[Fugazi]], and pretty much any north american punk band from the last 15 years.   Give me a chance to put some sources.. [[User:Dan Carkner|Dan Carkner]] 22:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
569014 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569013 +++$+++ 569013 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.161926520E09 +++$+++ Create the article in a user sub-page and gather the sources before attempting to recreate the page.  This should prevent its' speedy deletion. Pay attention to [[WP:BIO]] and [[Wikipedia:reliable sources]] to ensure that the standards are adhered to. Regards,  +++$+++ :Create the article in a user sub-page and gather the sources before attempting to recreate the page.  This should prevent its' speedy deletion. Pay attention to [[WP:BIO]] and [[Wikipedia:reliable sources]] to ensure that the standards are adhered to. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

268352 +++$+++ Dank55 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268352 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-08 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.215574920E09 +++$+++ were you responding to me or someone else at WT:FAC just now? (feel free to reply here) - Dan  +++$+++ were you responding to me or someone else at WT:FAC just now? (feel free to reply here) - Dan [[User:Dank55|Dank55]] ([[User talk:Dank55|talk]])([[Special:Contributions/Dank55|mistakes]]) 20:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
268353 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268352 +++$+++ 268352 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.215577260E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry. I've become grouchy in the course of this discussion on how to identify  \"significant contributors\" and \"main editors\".   I may have interpreted things wrongly. Please forgive me and don't take what I say personally. &mdash; +++$+++ :I'm sorry. I've become grouchy in the course of this discussion on how to identify  "significant contributors" and "main editors".   I may have interpreted things wrongly. Please forgive me and don't take what I say personally. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
268354 +++$+++ Dank55 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268352 +++$+++ 268353 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.215579420E09 +++$+++ Not at all, it didn't bother me.  I often suggest new approaches to old problems, and on average, about 90% of the responses are negative...which is as it should be at the brainstorming stage. - Dan  +++$+++ ::Not at all, it didn't bother me.  I often suggest new approaches to old problems, and on average, about 90% of the responses are negative...which is as it should be at the brainstorming stage. - Dan [[User:Dank55|Dank55]] ([[User talk:Dank55|talk]])([[Special:Contributions/Dank55|mistakes]]) 21:57, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

6209 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310649600E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on <span class=\"plainlinks\">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target=Tenebrae&namespace=6}} this link]<\/span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria|non-free content policy]].  If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target=Tenebrae&namespace=6}} this link]</span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria|non-free content policy]].  If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice --> [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 06:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
6210 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6209 +++$+++ 6209 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.310694240E09 +++$+++ This was already reviewed by admin [[User:Diannaa]], who wrote on 22:00, 14 March 2011 \"photo should be kept\". -- +++$+++ :This was already reviewed by admin [[User:Diannaa]], who wrote on 22:00, 14 March 2011 "photo should be kept". --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 18:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

530498 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-23 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.245755280E09 +++$+++ WOW .. you got some GREAT shots there RB.  Are all the ones you put up to flickr free? ... How do I see your gallery at commons? ... I got a link for my own gallery .. but there isn't much there yet.  Can I just transfer pics from my Google account (Picasa) to commons?  or do I have to do each individually? ... I know .. too many questions all at once.  Sorry ... OK... one big question, can you introduce me to Shannon Spade? ... LOL.  Sigh .. she's prolly younger than my daughter - but you can't blame a guy for thinking!  You did great buddy, and I'll try to match up some of those faces to the right drivers over the next couple days.  I love the pics .. great job! \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ WOW .. you got some GREAT shots there RB.  Are all the ones you put up to flickr free? ... How do I see your gallery at commons? ... I got a link for my own gallery .. but there isn't much there yet.  Can I just transfer pics from my Google account (Picasa) to commons?  or do I have to do each individually? ... I know .. too many questions all at once.  Sorry ... OK... one big question, can you introduce me to Shannon Spade? ... LOL.  Sigh .. she's prolly younger than my daughter - but you can't blame a guy for thinking!  You did great buddy, and I'll try to match up some of those faces to the right drivers over the next couple days.  I love the pics .. great job! — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 04:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
530499 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530498 +++$+++ 530498 +++$+++ 2009-06-23 04:20:00 +++$+++ 1.245756000E09 +++$+++ Shannon Spade was a real doll - I'd like to marry her. Okay, court her first. I have a picture of a woman who asked Shannon to be on a picture with her boyfriend\/man. Jamie Little would do too! They're both beautiful. They both were giggling a lot. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Shannon Spade was a real doll - I'd like to marry her. Okay, court her first. I have a picture of a woman who asked Shannon to be on a picture with her boyfriend/man. Jamie Little would do too! They're both beautiful. They both were giggling a lot. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:20, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
530500 +++$+++ ChildofMidnight +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530498 +++$+++ 530499 +++$+++ 2009-06-24 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.245891480E09 +++$+++ If it hadn't been so long since [[snickers salad]], I'm sure I wouldn't have confused you with the Law. Isn't it about time you whipped up some [[glorified rice]] or a [[seven-layer salad]]??? Or at least do up a batch of [[cookie salad]].  +++$+++ ::If it hadn't been so long since [[snickers salad]], I'm sure I wouldn't have confused you with the Law. Isn't it about time you whipped up some [[glorified rice]] or a [[seven-layer salad]]??? Or at least do up a batch of [[cookie salad]]. [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 17:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
530501 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530498 +++$+++ 530500 +++$+++ 2009-06-25 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.245923820E09 +++$+++ The only one of those that I know about it glorified rice, and that's because my aunt married a [[Yooper]]. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::The only one of those that I know about it glorified rice, and that's because my aunt married a [[Yooper]]. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

6211 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.310649660E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on <span class=\"plainlinks\">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target=Tenebrae&namespace=6}} this link]<\/span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria|non-free content policy]].  If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target=Tenebrae&namespace=6}} this link]</span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria|non-free content policy]].  If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice --> [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 06:21, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
6212 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.310694480E09 +++$+++ This image was removed summarily within minutes or at most hours after this notice was posted. This certainly did not provide enough time to go to the page and address whatever deficiencies there might have been, which would seem contrary to the process that we have in place specifically to address such things. -- +++$+++ ::This image was removed summarily within minutes or at most hours after this notice was posted. This certainly did not provide enough time to go to the page and address whatever deficiencies there might have been, which would seem contrary to the process that we have in place specifically to address such things. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 18:48, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
6213 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310696820E09 +++$+++ Please see [[WP:CSD#F7]]a, \"images with a clearly invalid fair-use tag\". Those get deleted immediately, without a waiting period, that's what the rules say. This image had a tag that said it was an illustration of a comic, which it wasn't. It was a piece of text. Since, being a piece of text, it was also obviously replaceable \u2013 i.e. with a textual paraphrase and\/or a citation or quote \u2013 there was no use in waiting for any potential formal fixes to the tag.  +++$+++ ::: Please see [[WP:CSD#F7]]a, "images with a clearly invalid fair-use tag". Those get deleted immediately, without a waiting period, that's what the rules say. This image had a tag that said it was an illustration of a comic, which it wasn't. It was a piece of text. Since, being a piece of text, it was also obviously replaceable – i.e. with a textual paraphrase and/or a citation or quote – there was no use in waiting for any potential formal fixes to the tag. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 19:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
6214 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.310698680E09 +++$+++ Without having had a chance to see it &mdash; I don't remember what this was or what article it appeared in &mdash; but just offhand I must wonder if what you consider text may be have been a graphical element, a trademarked logo, etc. Without knowing what the item was, I can't say whether it was a piece of text or one of these other possibilities. -- +++$+++ ::::Without having had a chance to see it &mdash; I don't remember what this was or what article it appeared in &mdash; but just offhand I must wonder if what you consider text may be have been a graphical element, a trademarked logo, etc. Without knowing what the item was, I can't say whether it was a piece of text or one of these other possibilities. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 19:58, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
6215 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.310699220E09 +++$+++ It was just a copyright notice, pure text. Here's the full extent of what it contained: \"''MARVEL MYSTERY COMICS is published monthly at Meriden, Conn., by Marvel Comics, Inc. Entered as second class matter at the post office at Meriden, Conn., under Act of March, 1879. Contents copyright 1944 by Marvel Comics, Inc., 350 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y., Martin Goodman, Pres. Vol. 1, No. 55, may, 1944 issue. Yearly subscription $1.00 in the U.S.A. Art and editorial by Funnies, Inc. No similarity between any of the names, characters, persons and\/or institutions appearing in this magazine with those of any living or dead person or institution is intended, and that any such similarity which may exist is purely coincidental. Printed in the U.S.A.''\" The context of use was here: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Timely_Comics&diff=439389720&oldid=438365326].  +++$+++ ::::: It was just a copyright notice, pure text. Here's the full extent of what it contained: "''MARVEL MYSTERY COMICS is published monthly at Meriden, Conn., by Marvel Comics, Inc. Entered as second class matter at the post office at Meriden, Conn., under Act of March, 1879. Contents copyright 1944 by Marvel Comics, Inc., 350 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y., Martin Goodman, Pres. Vol. 1, No. 55, may, 1944 issue. Yearly subscription $1.00 in the U.S.A. Art and editorial by Funnies, Inc. No similarity between any of the names, characters, persons and/or institutions appearing in this magazine with those of any living or dead person or institution is intended, and that any such similarity which may exist is purely coincidental. Printed in the U.S.A.''" The context of use was here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timely_Comics&diff=439389720&oldid=438365326]. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 20:07, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
6216 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.310701020E09 +++$+++ Thank you; I appreciate your taking the time to clarify. Again, my memory is dim, but if I recall correctly, that image illustrated that the well-known company name Marvel Comics was in use to a limited extent decades earlier, a historically significant point. I'm in no way arguing for its reinsertion; I've found this day's overall exchanges to be disheartening and I'm content at this point to withdraw from interaction -- +++$+++ :::::Thank you; I appreciate your taking the time to clarify. Again, my memory is dim, but if I recall correctly, that image illustrated that the well-known company name Marvel Comics was in use to a limited extent decades earlier, a historically significant point. I'm in no way arguing for its reinsertion; I've found this day's overall exchanges to be disheartening and I'm content at this point to withdraw from interaction --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae#top|talk]]) 20:37, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

530502 +++$+++ ChildofMidnight +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-27 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.246101360E09 +++$+++ How do I add you guys as friends on Flickr?  Is it okay to ask for an invitation, or is it like adminship where I should wait to be asked? :)  +++$+++ How do I add you guys as friends on Flickr?  Is it okay to ask for an invitation, or is it like adminship where I should wait to be asked? :) [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 04:16, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
530503 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530502 +++$+++ 530502 +++$+++ 2009-06-29 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.246271100E09 +++$+++ You can add someone as a friend on flickr by looking at their photostream and clicking on \"add .... as a contact\". That puts them in your list of friends. Any picture that they post comes up on your list of photos by your friends. Anyone is able to post pictures that can only be seen by their friends and\/or family. For those pictures, they have to add you as a friend. You can add me as a friend [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/royal_broil\/ here]. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :You can add someone as a friend on flickr by looking at their photostream and clicking on "add .... as a contact". That puts them in your list of friends. Any picture that they post comes up on your list of photos by your friends. Anyone is able to post pictures that can only be seen by their friends and/or family. For those pictures, they have to add you as a friend. You can add me as a friend [http://www.flickr.com/photos/royal_broil/ here]. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

268359 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268359 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-11 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.215809580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for revisiting the [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/Trump_International_Hotel_and_Tower_(Chicago)|FAC]] discussion.  You may have noticed I gave an extensive response to your thoughts on overlinking.  I also removed a few links.  You did not comment on the issue.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ Thanks for revisiting the [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Trump_International_Hotel_and_Tower_(Chicago)|FAC]] discussion.  You may have noticed I gave an extensive response to your thoughts on overlinking.  I also removed a few links.  You did not comment on the issue.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 13:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
268360 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268359 +++$+++ 268359 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.215903660E09 +++$+++ You may have noticed that another editor took over the copyediting of the article.  Since you last noted you remain opposed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Trump_International_Hotel_and_Tower_(Chicago)&diff=225174408&oldid=225043987 a lot has changed].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :You may have noticed that another editor took over the copyediting of the article.  Since you last noted you remain opposed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trump_International_Hotel_and_Tower_(Chicago)&diff=225174408&oldid=225043987 a lot has changed].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 16:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
268361 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268359 +++$+++ 268360 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.215903840E09 +++$+++ I see you just commneted at 15:48 (UTC).  Sorry for the bother.  Thanks for your continuing attention.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::I see you just commneted at 15:48 (UTC).  Sorry for the bother.  Thanks for your continuing attention.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 16:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
268362 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268359 +++$+++ 268361 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.215904440E09 +++$+++ (ec) I did notice that and praise him for all his hard work. He did help the over linking situation greatly and tightened the prose. The problem is that you and I disagree over what is properly contained in such an article. To me, much of the the article reads  like one of those combination of gossip and advertising tabloids that you use as sources. As I said before, the article will probably attain FA despite my opinion. And I do hand it to you for all the work you have put into it and even more for the compromises you have made. I think you probably are a Chicago booster. It is a shame though, that Chicago's fine architectural tradition and it's famed school of architecture is now consigned to the rubbish heap of history in its newest buildings.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::(ec) I did notice that and praise him for all his hard work. He did help the over linking situation greatly and tightened the prose. The problem is that you and I disagree over what is properly contained in such an article. To me, much of the the article reads  like one of those combination of gossip and advertising tabloids that you use as sources. As I said before, the article will probably attain FA despite my opinion. And I do hand it to you for all the work you have put into it and even more for the compromises you have made. I think you probably are a Chicago booster. It is a shame though, that Chicago's fine architectural tradition and it's famed school of architecture is now consigned to the rubbish heap of history in its newest buildings.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

530505 +++$+++ Sift&Winnow +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530505 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-02 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.246522980E09 +++$+++ Sometimes you just have to wait a while until a particular editor has lost interest in an article before you can make needed changes. I hadn't read the Talk page until ''after'' I made the edits. Does it look balanced to you now? There may have been shenanigans among unsavory characters associated with the shrine, but I could not readily find reliable sources to that effect. As I mentioned to RFD, next week I'm going to try to find some more reliable sources from contemporaneous newspapers about the entire set of events. Do you ever use NewspaperArchive.com for sources? It's great! --'''<font color=\"#DAA520\"> +++$+++ Sometimes you just have to wait a while until a particular editor has lost interest in an article before you can make needed changes. I hadn't read the Talk page until ''after'' I made the edits. Does it look balanced to you now? There may have been shenanigans among unsavory characters associated with the shrine, but I could not readily find reliable sources to that effect. As I mentioned to RFD, next week I'm going to try to find some more reliable sources from contemporaneous newspapers about the entire set of events. Do you ever use NewspaperArchive.com for sources? It's great! --'''<font color="#DAA520">[[User:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Sift]]</font><small>&amp;</small><font color="#A0522D">[[User talk:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Winnow]]</font>''' 01:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
530506 +++$+++ Sift&Winnow +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530505 +++$+++ 530505 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.246526820E09 +++$+++ NewspaperArchive.com has digitized over 900 historical Wisconsin newspapers, so it's good for local history. I did a quick search of it for some of the alleged crimes associated with Necedah, and found nothing. They should have appeared in newspapers, if they really happened. Although pedophilia, or any other crime, committed by an affiliate of an organization may not be fair game for an article on the organization, one of the claims was that the shrine participated in a cover-up of the incident, and that does seem like fair game, if factual. Thanks for your comments.  --'''<font color=\"#DAA520\"> +++$+++ :NewspaperArchive.com has digitized over 900 historical Wisconsin newspapers, so it's good for local history. I did a quick search of it for some of the alleged crimes associated with Necedah, and found nothing. They should have appeared in newspapers, if they really happened. Although pedophilia, or any other crime, committed by an affiliate of an organization may not be fair game for an article on the organization, one of the claims was that the shrine participated in a cover-up of the incident, and that does seem like fair game, if factual. Thanks for your comments.  --'''<font color="#DAA520">[[User:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Sift]]</font><small>&amp;</small><font color="#A0522D">[[User talk:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Winnow]]</font>''' 02:27, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

268363 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268363 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-12 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.215907020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''TONY'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 16:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
268364 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268363 +++$+++ 268363 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.215907440E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Unfortunately I must have worded it incorrectly, as the editor was told to put the links back in. Personally I do not understand the ruckus over the format of dates. I know a date when I see one regardless of format. I have my Preferences set to none. &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks. Unfortunately I must have worded it incorrectly, as the editor was told to put the links back in. Personally I do not understand the ruckus over the format of dates. I know a date when I see one regardless of format. I have my Preferences set to none. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
268365 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268363 +++$+++ 268363 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.216072740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your support on this issue, Mattisse.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your support on this issue, Mattisse. [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''TONY'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 14:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
268366 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268363 +++$+++ 268365 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.216074000E09 +++$+++ Perhaps I will stay out of it then as I don't want to get entangled in unpleasantness with other people who have hardened views. I lack an automated way of inserting NBSP's except the paste method you mention. So I am fearful of making a mistake and getting punished for it! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::Perhaps I will stay out of it then as I don't want to get entangled in unpleasantness with other people who have hardened views. I lack an automated way of inserting NBSP's except the paste method you mention. So I am fearful of making a mistake and getting punished for it! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
268367 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268363 +++$+++ 268366 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.216122120E09 +++$+++ Problem solved: I've been bold and removed the requirement from MOS (it was inserted only a month or two ago, when we overhauled the hard-space section). Now, we're left simply with MOSNUM's \"Consider adding a [hard space] ...\", which you can ignore if you wish. I don't add them when removing them manually, I can assure you. Without a short-cut (yet another issue MediaWiki hasn't addressed, damn it), the gobbledygood character-string is just TOO MUCH! But I insert on my semi-automatic macros when I cleanse an article. With or without, no prob.  +++$+++ :::Problem solved: I've been bold and removed the requirement from MOS (it was inserted only a month or two ago, when we overhauled the hard-space section). Now, we're left simply with MOSNUM's "Consider adding a [hard space] ...", which you can ignore if you wish. I don't add them when removing them manually, I can assure you. Without a short-cut (yet another issue MediaWiki hasn't addressed, damn it), the gobbledygood character-string is just TOO MUCH! But I insert on my semi-automatic macros when I cleanse an article. With or without, no prob. [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''TONY'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 04:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
268368 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268363 +++$+++ 268367 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.216154820E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I'm always happy to see common sense triumph.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Thanks! I'm always happy to see common sense triumph.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:47, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

6221 +++$+++ Born2cycle +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311209160E09 +++$+++ Hi.  Thanks for your supporting comment at [[Wikipedia talk:Wikiquette alerts#Dispute resolution noticeboard proposal]].  I'm thinking of creating a new Category, something like, \"Wikipedians with zero tolerance for incivility and disrespect\"...  What do you think? -- +++$+++ Hi.  Thanks for your supporting comment at [[Wikipedia talk:Wikiquette alerts#Dispute resolution noticeboard proposal]].  I'm thinking of creating a new Category, something like, "Wikipedians with zero tolerance for incivility and disrespect"...  What do you think? --[[User:Born2cycle|Born2cycle]] ([[User talk:Born2cycle|talk]]) 17:46, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
6222 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6221 +++$+++ 6221 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311214380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pointing out the lack of sig. I can try and reduce the reddishness, but the reason I redden my pics slightly is because they'll look yellow otherwise. So do you think I should start a discussion?  +++$+++ :Thanks for pointing out the lack of sig. I can try and reduce the reddishness, but the reason I redden my pics slightly is because they'll look yellow otherwise. So do you think I should start a discussion? [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 19:13, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
6223 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6221 +++$+++ 6222 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311231840E09 +++$+++ Okay, I desaturated it just a bit. What do you think of it now?  +++$+++ ::Okay, I desaturated it just a bit. What do you think of it now? [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 00:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
6224 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6221 +++$+++ 6223 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.311232620E09 +++$+++ And thank you for the compliment.  +++$+++ :::And thank you for the compliment. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 00:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
6225 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6221 +++$+++ 6224 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311236700E09 +++$+++ Okay, the discussion is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Grant_Morrison#Infobox_photo here]. Please voice (or cut and paste) your thoughts?  +++$+++ ::::Okay, the discussion is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Grant_Morrison#Infobox_photo here]. Please voice (or cut and paste) your thoughts? [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 01:25, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

530512 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530512 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-18 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.247964000E09 +++$+++ Hi! I saw your article on [[Steinthal, Wisconsin]]. I notice your photo of the chapel. Is there a story about that chapel? I found it interesting. Hope you are doing well. I will be undergoing minor surgery on July 24, but they have to put me under for 20-25 minutes.Many thanks- +++$+++ Hi! I saw your article on [[Steinthal, Wisconsin]]. I notice your photo of the chapel. Is there a story about that chapel? I found it interesting. Hope you are doing well. I will be undergoing minor surgery on July 24, but they have to put me under for 20-25 minutes.Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 17:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
530513 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530512 +++$+++ 530512 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.247983980E09 +++$+++ I had a newspaper article about the chapel back last year when I took the photos but I don't think I have it any more. The community is really small, it was the most interesting thing! A bunch of high school students were building it. I'll look. If the image is out of place, then feel free to remove it. I'll pray that the surgery is successful! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I had a newspaper article about the chapel back last year when I took the photos but I don't think I have it any more. The community is really small, it was the most interesting thing! A bunch of high school students were building it. I'll look. If the image is out of place, then feel free to remove it. I'll pray that the surgery is successful! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
530514 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530512 +++$+++ 530512 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.247985600E09 +++$+++ Many thanks-the image is not out of place-it is very interesting.I will try to find some information- +++$+++ :Many thanks-the image is not out of place-it is very interesting.I will try to find some information-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 23:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
530515 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530512 +++$+++ 530514 +++$+++ 2009-07-19 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.247999580E09 +++$+++ I looked through my entire stack of Wikipedia source articles and I can't find the article from the [[Tri-County News (Wisconsin)]] at nearby [[Kiel, Wisconsin]]. I think my cousin (an inactive Wikipedian) might know about the chapel; I sent him an email. I see him at least once in every few months and we frequently talk about Wikipedia. He loves asking about who I've blocked - I just chuckle. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I looked through my entire stack of Wikipedia source articles and I can't find the article from the [[Tri-County News (Wisconsin)]] at nearby [[Kiel, Wisconsin]]. I think my cousin (an inactive Wikipedian) might know about the chapel; I sent him an email. I see him at least once in every few months and we frequently talk about Wikipedia. He loves asking about who I've blocked - I just chuckle. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
530516 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530512 +++$+++ 530514 +++$+++ 2009-07-19 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.248037680E09 +++$+++ The reason I am interested in this chapel that a few months ago I came across a story about a young boy from Missouri who had an idea for a small church on his family's property and started to save his money to built it. His parents were not too overly religious but they tolerant it. The little boy even made a model of what his church look like. Unfortunately, the little boy died suddenly and his parents and grandparents built the church and the little boy is buried in the cemetery next to his church. The boy's first name was something like McKendree and it made national news. I am not sure if Wikipedia has an article.Many thanks- +++$+++ :: The reason I am interested in this chapel that a few months ago I came across a story about a young boy from Missouri who had an idea for a small church on his family's property and started to save his money to built it. His parents were not too overly religious but they tolerant it. The little boy even made a model of what his church look like. Unfortunately, the little boy died suddenly and his parents and grandparents built the church and the little boy is buried in the cemetery next to his church. The boy's first name was something like McKendree and it made national news. I am not sure if Wikipedia has an article.Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:08, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
530517 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530512 +++$+++ 530512 +++$+++ 2009-07-19 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.248040440E09 +++$+++ I found it! Mackintyre Garton he was the little boy-[http:\/\/www.mackintyreschurch.com] I am not sure if Wikipedia has an article about it-thanks- +++$+++ :I found it! Mackintyre Garton he was the little boy-[http://www.mackintyreschurch.com] I am not sure if Wikipedia has an article about it-thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:54, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
530518 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530512 +++$+++ 530517 +++$+++ 2009-07-20 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.248081060E09 +++$+++ I would expect this story to be considered [[WP:ONEVENT|a one time event]] so I'd avoid the topic. I've been talking with my parents about coming to La Crosse for the Oktoberfest race weekend at La Crosse Speedway and I'm seriously considering coming for the Saturday night races. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I would expect this story to be considered [[WP:ONEVENT|a one time event]] so I'd avoid the topic. I've been talking with my parents about coming to La Crosse for the Oktoberfest race weekend at La Crosse Speedway and I'm seriously considering coming for the Saturday night races. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

268369 +++$+++ Catalan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-15 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.216166100E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the invaluable copyediting you did to the article - it was crucial for the FAC.  +++$+++ Thank you for the invaluable copyediting you did to the article - it was crucial for the FAC. [[User:Catalan|JonCatalán]] ([[User talk:Catalan|talk]]) 16:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
268370 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268369 +++$+++ 268369 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.216167240E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. Congradulations!  &mdash; +++$+++ :You are very welcome. Congradulations!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

6226 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311231180E09 +++$+++ Without giving anything away, is this name used in the film?-- +++$+++ Without giving anything away, is this name used in the film?--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 23:53, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
6227 +++$+++ TriiipleThreat +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ 6226 +++$+++ 6226 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.311231300E09 +++$+++ Heh, never mind :). -- +++$+++ :Heh, never mind :). --[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 23:55, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

268371 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-17 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.216294740E09 +++$+++ You stated the following: \"The only reason for linking dates at all was for the autoformatting function. \" and a whole bunch of stuff that follows somewhat logically if this is true.  However, I am not sure it is true.  Can you tell me what do you mean by autoformatting and can dates be linked without autoformatting.  I keep seeing dates linked in articles on the main page at [[WP:TFA]] and don't know what the fuss is about.  For example, look at the first paragraph of yesterday's TFA, [[Guitar Hero (video game)]].  That has a whole bunch of linked dates.  How does autoformatting relate to these dates.  Should the be delinked?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ You stated the following: "The only reason for linking dates at all was for the autoformatting function. " and a whole bunch of stuff that follows somewhat logically if this is true.  However, I am not sure it is true.  Can you tell me what do you mean by autoformatting and can dates be linked without autoformatting.  I keep seeing dates linked in articles on the main page at [[WP:TFA]] and don't know what the fuss is about.  For example, look at the first paragraph of yesterday's TFA, [[Guitar Hero (video game)]].  That has a whole bunch of linked dates.  How does autoformatting relate to these dates.  Should the be delinked?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 04:39, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
268372 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268371 +++$+++ 268371 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.216326840E09 +++$+++ Hope this helps. I think I am explaining the situation correctly. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Hope this helps. I think I am explaining the situation correctly. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
268373 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268371 +++$+++ 268372 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.216336200E09 +++$+++ I remain confused on the difference between standard format dates and autoformatted dates.  Please join the discussion at [[User_talk:Tony1#Linking_dates]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::I remain confused on the difference between standard format dates and autoformatted dates.  Please join the discussion at [[User_talk:Tony1#Linking_dates]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 16:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
268374 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268371 +++$+++ 268373 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.216340580E09 +++$+++ I am trying to get all the discussion in one place please respond at [[User_talk:Tony1#Linking_dates]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::I am trying to get all the discussion in one place please respond at [[User_talk:Tony1#Linking_dates]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 17:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

586629 +++$+++ Zidane tribal +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 586629 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-23 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.237803060E09 +++$+++ I`ve been working on albums article assessment for a while now and i have crossed with thousands of these warnings and since you were part of the indefinite block of the user i was wondering if there could be a way to find every warning that he did, especially if the image it was meant to has been deleted so we can delete the warnings as well.  +++$+++ I`ve been working on albums article assessment for a while now and i have crossed with thousands of these warnings and since you were part of the indefinite block of the user i was wondering if there could be a way to find every warning that he did, especially if the image it was meant to has been deleted so we can delete the warnings as well. [[User:Zidane tribal|Zidane tribal]] ([[User talk:Zidane tribal|talk]]) 03:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
586630 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 586629 +++$+++ 586629 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.237850880E09 +++$+++ Hmm...I'm not a bot programmer, so I wouldn't know how to make a bot or a script that would find all the notices on article talk pages. The simplest way would be to go into the talk page edits of the BetacommandBot, but it would takes ages to go through them all manually. Somebody like [[User:Maxim|Maxim]] or [[User:Mr.Z-man|Mr.Z-man]] might be able to help, as they're excellent with bots and scripts, but if they can't, you can try posting at [[Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)]], for there will be someone watching that page who will know what to do. Hope this helps. Best wishes.  +++$+++ :Hmm...I'm not a bot programmer, so I wouldn't know how to make a bot or a script that would find all the notices on article talk pages. The simplest way would be to go into the talk page edits of the BetacommandBot, but it would takes ages to go through them all manually. Somebody like [[User:Maxim|Maxim]] or [[User:Mr.Z-man|Mr.Z-man]] might be able to help, as they're excellent with bots and scripts, but if they can't, you can try posting at [[Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)]], for there will be someone watching that page who will know what to do. Hope this helps. Best wishes. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:28, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

268375 +++$+++ Alarob +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-19 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.216511760E09 +++$+++ I started the article over a year ago because it was flagged at [[WP:AFRO|WikiProject:African diaspora]] as a needed article. Of course it is not \"mine\" and I have been hoping others would step in. Right now, though, I feel a little impatient. Would like to step back from the discussion until I regain my cool, so would be obliged if you would continue to give your views. --  +++$+++ I started the article over a year ago because it was flagged at [[WP:AFRO|WikiProject:African diaspora]] as a needed article. Of course it is not "mine" and I have been hoping others would step in. Right now, though, I feel a little impatient. Would like to step back from the discussion until I regain my cool, so would be obliged if you would continue to give your views. -- [[User:Alarob|ℜob ℂ.]] alias [[User_talk:Alarob|ⒶⓁⒶⓇⓄⒷ]] 16:56, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
268376 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268375 +++$+++ 268375 +++$+++ 2008-07-19 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.216518240E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. I am very interested in the topic and surprise that there is not more well-sourced information on it. It seems to me I have read more on it but I cannot remember where.  &mdash; +++$+++ :You are welcome. I am very interested in the topic and surprise that there is not more well-sourced information on it. It seems to me I have read more on it but I cannot remember where.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="007FFF">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:44, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

268377 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-22 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.216717680E09 +++$+++ A few writers in the 18th century experienced concerns of \"madness\". Right now, I've been working with SandyGeorgia going over [[Samuel Johnson]]. In the 18th century context, \"madness\" was mostly just an excuse to lock people up, instead of an actual diagnosis as it is today. Now, Christopher Smart's case was more cut forward (see [[Christopher Smart's alleged madness]] for about 70% of the information) as there was not enough evidence to really suggest problems. However, Johnson's was more problematic. There were 18th century ideas of \"madness\" and many reports of actions. Then there are current diagnosis and actual arguments for him having Tourette syndrome. Now, I was thinking of having the 18th century view put into a style like Christopher Smart's, and having the medical view (actual diagnosis based on actual criteria) be given its own page. I was wondering if you could think this over and see if it would really \"flow\" properly. We are looking for many opinions on this, and I would appreciate yours. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Samuel_Johnson#Johnson_and_madness Here] is where the most recent discussion happened. And excuse the tense language, we are working to move it to an FA and the amount of effort and work put strain on all of us, so, yeah. :)  +++$+++ A few writers in the 18th century experienced concerns of "madness". Right now, I've been working with SandyGeorgia going over [[Samuel Johnson]]. In the 18th century context, "madness" was mostly just an excuse to lock people up, instead of an actual diagnosis as it is today. Now, Christopher Smart's case was more cut forward (see [[Christopher Smart's alleged madness]] for about 70% of the information) as there was not enough evidence to really suggest problems. However, Johnson's was more problematic. There were 18th century ideas of "madness" and many reports of actions. Then there are current diagnosis and actual arguments for him having Tourette syndrome. Now, I was thinking of having the 18th century view put into a style like Christopher Smart's, and having the medical view (actual diagnosis based on actual criteria) be given its own page. I was wondering if you could think this over and see if it would really "flow" properly. We are looking for many opinions on this, and I would appreciate yours. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Samuel_Johnson#Johnson_and_madness Here] is where the most recent discussion happened. And excuse the tense language, we are working to move it to an FA and the amount of effort and work put strain on all of us, so, yeah. :) [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 02:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
268378 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268377 +++$+++ 268377 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.216773480E09 +++$+++ I have read over the talk page discussion and I am afraid I don't quite understand what you are proposing. Is it a series of separate articles on people who may or may not have been \"mad\" from an 18th century point of view, like perhaps [[William Blake]],  stressing in each case the political uses of \"madness\" a la [[Michel Foucault]], [[Thomas Szasz]], and perhaps the [[anti-psychiatry]] movement in general? It seems to me actual arguments regarding a subject's mental status would go into the biography about that person, as could any ruminations of that person on the subject.  Perhaps there is enough material, without being repetitious, to compile many, separate articles, if that is what you are suggesting. Am I understanding correctly?  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I have read over the talk page discussion and I am afraid I don't quite understand what you are proposing. Is it a series of separate articles on people who may or may not have been "mad" from an 18th century point of view, like perhaps [[William Blake]],  stressing in each case the political uses of "madness" a la [[Michel Foucault]], [[Thomas Szasz]], and perhaps the [[anti-psychiatry]] movement in general? It seems to me actual arguments regarding a subject's mental status would go into the biography about that person, as could any ruminations of that person on the subject.  Perhaps there is enough material, without being repetitious, to compile many, separate articles, if that is what you are suggesting. Am I understanding correctly?  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
268379 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268377 +++$+++ 268378 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.216774140E09 +++$+++ Basically. Those like William Cowper (who was \"treated\"), Smart, Johnson, etc, have many books devoted to their \"madness\" and their view points. I would only focus on those who have many sources and had \"famous\" cases devoted to them (like Dr Brain's analysis of Smart, Johnson, and Boswell). While Johnson has \"actual\" diagnosis (i.e. Tourette Syndrome) this would need a separate page, so no one confuses the 18th century political\/social use of madness with actual psychiatry. This would only be proposed where the information is notable to the individual (being locked away, being kept from society, etc). I can think of 4 major theorists who discuss the generality of the use of \"madness\" in the 18th century, and can come up with multiple sources (over 15 for Smart, over 10 for Johnson, and over 10 for Cowper). Its a notable topic, just hard to put together (lack of interest in the 18th century).  +++$+++ ::Basically. Those like William Cowper (who was "treated"), Smart, Johnson, etc, have many books devoted to their "madness" and their view points. I would only focus on those who have many sources and had "famous" cases devoted to them (like Dr Brain's analysis of Smart, Johnson, and Boswell). While Johnson has "actual" diagnosis (i.e. Tourette Syndrome) this would need a separate page, so no one confuses the 18th century political/social use of madness with actual psychiatry. This would only be proposed where the information is notable to the individual (being locked away, being kept from society, etc). I can think of 4 major theorists who discuss the generality of the use of "madness" in the 18th century, and can come up with multiple sources (over 15 for Smart, over 10 for Johnson, and over 10 for Cowper). Its a notable topic, just hard to put together (lack of interest in the 18th century). [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 17:49, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
268380 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268377 +++$+++ 268379 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.216775220E09 +++$+++ Is your position that none of these persons actually had a mental illness, and that the medical ignorance of the day was strictly used for political ends? (I would have to disagree with that point of view, I'm afraid.) However, a thoughtful inquiry into the very real problems of dealing with various forms of mental illness at a time when medical knowledge was nil might also be worth exploring - along with the issue of the misuse of labeling people. &mdash; +++$+++ :::Is your position that none of these persons actually had a mental illness, and that the medical ignorance of the day was strictly used for political ends? (I would have to disagree with that point of view, I'm afraid.) However, a thoughtful inquiry into the very real problems of dealing with various forms of mental illness at a time when medical knowledge was nil might also be worth exploring - along with the issue of the misuse of labeling people. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
268381 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268377 +++$+++ 268380 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.216780440E09 +++$+++ \"madness\" isn't a mental illness perse, but a social\/political label, and there were laws passed to redefine treatment and to give people rights. While someone like Smart was imprisoned, there were no trials, and people could have habeas corpus rulings to force the prisons to be released. However, this was hard to accomplish based on the corruption found within the system. I'd want to separate the medical from the social ramifications. Yes, some of these people may have had real problems, but most were locked away because they were \"threats\" to someone. Before this time, they would just outright kill political dissidents and the \"disagreeable\", however, this became an easier solution. For example, a lot of the early Methodists were affected by the branch type of \"madness\" called \"religious hysteria\" that labeled any evangelical as potentially mad.. It was a strange phenomena, and it forced the British parliament to adopt many reforms until the practice was \"fixed\".  +++$+++ ::::"madness" isn't a mental illness perse, but a social/political label, and there were laws passed to redefine treatment and to give people rights. While someone like Smart was imprisoned, there were no trials, and people could have habeas corpus rulings to force the prisons to be released. However, this was hard to accomplish based on the corruption found within the system. I'd want to separate the medical from the social ramifications. Yes, some of these people may have had real problems, but most were locked away because they were "threats" to someone. Before this time, they would just outright kill political dissidents and the "disagreeable", however, this became an easier solution. For example, a lot of the early Methodists were affected by the branch type of "madness" called "religious hysteria" that labeled any evangelical as potentially mad.. It was a strange phenomena, and it forced the British parliament to adopt many reforms until the practice was "fixed". [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 19:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

263183 +++$+++ Literaturegeek  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-04 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.275715200E09 +++$+++ Hi Colin, a conversation came up on [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#More_admins_needed| wiki med and I mentioned your name]] as someone who may like to try for adminship. Are you interested? You certainly have the experience and I imagine community support if you ran.-- +++$+++ Hi Colin, a conversation came up on [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#More_admins_needed| wiki med and I mentioned your name]] as someone who may like to try for adminship. Are you interested? You certainly have the experience and I imagine community support if you ran.--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 22:20, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
263184 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263183 +++$+++ 263183 +++$+++ 2010-06-05 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.275788040E09 +++$+++ Thanks Literaturegeek, but adminship doesn't interest me and I don't have enough time for WP to make it worthwhile even if it did. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks Literaturegeek, but adminship doesn't interest me and I don't have enough time for WP to make it worthwhile even if it did. Cheers, [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:34, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
263185 +++$+++ Literaturegeek  +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 263183 +++$+++ 263184 +++$+++ 2010-06-06 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.275893520E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. It is a shame but I understand why you don't want to. :)-- +++$+++ ::You are welcome. It is a shame but I understand why you don't want to. :)--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 23:52, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

6238 +++$+++ Kurdo777 +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-24 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.245912600E09 +++$+++ Please check the proposals and the counter-proposals on [[Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'\xe9tat]]. -- +++$+++ Please check the proposals and the counter-proposals on [[Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état]]. --[[User:Kurdo777|Kurdo777]] ([[User talk:Kurdo777|talk]]) 23:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
6239 +++$+++ Kurdo777 +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6238 +++$+++ 6238 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.246520400E09 +++$+++ Binksternet's original proposal was at [[Talk:1953_Iranian_coup_d'\xe9tat#Rebuilding_the_lede]]. I think discussing a compromise with SnowFire or Binksternet could lead to a workable solution. But I don't think there is any point in arguing with BoogaLouie - for reasons I won't go into yet - but a courtesy look at [http:\/\/gemsofislamism.tripod.com\/ his website] will give you the clues you need. I would suggest that you propose your own version of a compromise lead, something based on Binksternet's original proposal with some minor modifications that addresses the minor accuracy issues we discussed in \"Re: Problems\" and a disclaimer that the \"fears od communist takeover\" was a rational given by US administration, but refuted by many modern historians as \"exaggerated\" or something like that. -- +++$+++ : Binksternet's original proposal was at [[Talk:1953_Iranian_coup_d'état#Rebuilding_the_lede]]. I think discussing a compromise with SnowFire or Binksternet could lead to a workable solution. But I don't think there is any point in arguing with BoogaLouie - for reasons I won't go into yet - but a courtesy look at [http://gemsofislamism.tripod.com/ his website] will give you the clues you need. I would suggest that you propose your own version of a compromise lead, something based on Binksternet's original proposal with some minor modifications that addresses the minor accuracy issues we discussed in "Re: Problems" and a disclaimer that the "fears od communist takeover" was a rational given by US administration, but refuted by many modern historians as "exaggerated" or something like that. --[[User:Kurdo777|Kurdo777]] ([[User talk:Kurdo777|talk]]) 00:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

415541 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ Mdd4696 +++$+++ 415541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-29 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.188432000E09 +++$+++ Would you consider unblocking the above IP? The person editing from that IP was the article subject - she got in touch with me and we got the issue with her article resolved to everyone's satisfaction. For the block to occur so long after the disruptive behavior had stopped makes it look more punitive than preventative. Thanks!  +++$+++ Would you consider unblocking the above IP? The person editing from that IP was the article subject - she got in touch with me and we got the issue with her article resolved to everyone's satisfaction. For the block to occur so long after the disruptive behavior had stopped makes it look more punitive than preventative. Thanks! [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 17:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
415542 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ Mdd4696 +++$+++ 415541 +++$+++ 415541 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.188432180E09 +++$+++ Some related discussion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:AnonEMouse#Jessica_Cutler_.28mostly.29_resolved here].  +++$+++ : Some related discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AnonEMouse#Jessica_Cutler_.28mostly.29_resolved here]. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 17:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

6240 +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-10 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.247277720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Skywriter|Skywriter]] ([[User talk:Skywriter|talk]]) 19:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
6241 +++$+++ BoogaLouie +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6240 +++$+++ 6240 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.247283300E09 +++$+++ Did not delete. Moved it to the other criticisms below -- +++$+++ :Did not delete. Moved it to the other criticisms below --[[User:BoogaLouie|BoogaLouie]] ([[User talk:BoogaLouie|talk]]) 20:35, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

6242 +++$+++ BoogaLouie +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-17 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.247814240E09 +++$+++ Reposted from my talk page -- +++$+++ Reposted from my talk page --[[User:BoogaLouie|BoogaLouie]] ([[User talk:BoogaLouie|talk]]) 00:04, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
6243 +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6242 +++$+++ 6242 +++$+++ 2009-06-26 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.246056240E09 +++$+++ 1952 was a very dangerous time. The Cold War was hot in Korea. The Soviet Union had tried to take all Berlin in 1948. Stalin was still alive. On no account could the Western powers risk a Soviet takeover of Iran, which would almost certainly have led to World War III[28] (Why is this in here at all? How insightful is a young diplomat? ''Stalin was still alive'' is a non sequitur. A lot of people were ''still alive.'' Hell, I was ''still alive.'' What does who is ''still alive'' have to do with anything, esp. the 1953 coup in Iran? +++$+++ :1952 was a very dangerous time. The Cold War was hot in Korea. The Soviet Union had tried to take all Berlin in 1948. Stalin was still alive. On no account could the Western powers risk a Soviet takeover of Iran, which would almost certainly have led to World War III[28] (Why is this in here at all? How insightful is a young diplomat? ''Stalin was still alive'' is a non sequitur. A lot of people were ''still alive.'' Hell, I was ''still alive.'' What does who is ''still alive'' have to do with anything, esp. the 1953 coup in Iran?[[User:Skywriter|Skywriter]] ([[User talk:Skywriter|talk]]) 15:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

569019 +++$+++ Yankees76 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569019 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.161983760E09 +++$+++ I've noticed that you blocked anon [[User:71.240.246.79|71.240.246.79]] for 72 hours citing vandalism. I beleive the anon user may have been involved in a POV dispute with a suspected sockpuppet\/meatpuppet, and may have been blocked unfairly. While I was compiling evidence against this sockpuppet master, I discovered your block. While I don't suggest and unblock, it might be worth a second look. Here is the sock evidence page for reference. [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Messenger2010]]. I'll watchlist your page so you can reply here. Regards,  +++$+++ I've noticed that you blocked anon [[User:71.240.246.79|71.240.246.79]] for 72 hours citing vandalism. I beleive the anon user may have been involved in a POV dispute with a suspected sockpuppet/meatpuppet, and may have been blocked unfairly. While I was compiling evidence against this sockpuppet master, I discovered your block. While I don't suggest and unblock, it might be worth a second look. Here is the sock evidence page for reference. [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Messenger2010]]. I'll watchlist your page so you can reply here. Regards, [[User:Yankees76|Yankees76]] 14:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
569020 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569019 +++$+++ 569019 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.162005480E09 +++$+++ OK, I have looked over your case regarding Messenger 2010 and I agree that there may be a point of equivocation regarding the block. This doesn't negate the edit war that was being pursued over the articles-in-question, but I am always open to listen to a reasoned debate and I can unblock if the editor can demonstrate that they were a victim of a sockpuppet vandal. Regards,  +++$+++ :OK, I have looked over your case regarding Messenger 2010 and I agree that there may be a point of equivocation regarding the block. This doesn't negate the edit war that was being pursued over the articles-in-question, but I am always open to listen to a reasoned debate and I can unblock if the editor can demonstrate that they were a victim of a sockpuppet vandal. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 20:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
569021 +++$+++ Yankees76 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569019 +++$+++ 569020 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.162006320E09 +++$+++ I'll let that editor decide if they want to do that or not, I only came across the block while reviewing Messenger2010 and the sock connections and thought I'd share my opinion. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::I'll let that editor decide if they want to do that or not, I only came across the block while reviewing Messenger2010 and the sock connections and thought I'd share my opinion. Thanks. [[User:Yankees76|Yankees76]] 20:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

6244 +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-10 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.247282460E09 +++$+++ I note that you have failed to answer the questions posed above. I note also that you seem unwilling to compromise on any issue pertaining to the 1953 coup in Iraq.  +++$+++ I note that you have failed to answer the questions posed above. I note also that you seem unwilling to compromise on any issue pertaining to the 1953 coup in Iraq. [[User:Skywriter|Skywriter]] ([[User talk:Skywriter|talk]]) 20:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
6245 +++$+++ BoogaLouie +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6244 +++$+++ 6244 +++$+++ 2009-07-17 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.247814240E09 +++$+++ I hope that helps answer some of your questions. Have a nice day. :-) -- +++$+++ :I hope that helps answer some of your questions. Have a nice day. :-) --[[User:BoogaLouie|BoogaLouie]] ([[User talk:BoogaLouie|talk]]) 00:04, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

268389 +++$+++ Compson1 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-30 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.217403540E09 +++$+++ ABC was the first to report the shooting, and it had some compelling interviews from the pantry.  If you've seen the CBS and NBC footage (NBC's is available on hulu.com), you know that their footage was much more dramatic, but no one saw theirs for some time, because their color film had to be developed.   +++$+++ ABC was the first to report the shooting, and it had some compelling interviews from the pantry.  If you've seen the CBS and NBC footage (NBC's is available on hulu.com), you know that their footage was much more dramatic, but no one saw theirs for some time, because their color film had to be developed.  [[User:Compson1|Compson1]] ([[User talk:Compson1|talk]]) 00:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
268390 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268389 +++$+++ 268389 +++$+++ 2008-07-30 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.217456040E09 +++$+++ As I said, on the question of the timing, the Time magazine article you use as a reference says that ABC had a news flash two minutes after the shooting. I was watching TV that night, having worked on the Kennedy campaign in California, and saw what must have been the ABC news flash and subsequent follow up which was very dramatic. If the flash had not occurrence while the program was still on air, I would have just gone to sleep not knowing of the shooting. &mdash; +++$+++ :As I said, on the question of the timing, the Time magazine article you use as a reference says that ABC had a news flash two minutes after the shooting. I was watching TV that night, having worked on the Kennedy campaign in California, and saw what must have been the ABC news flash and subsequent follow up which was very dramatic. If the flash had not occurrence while the program was still on air, I would have just gone to sleep not knowing of the shooting. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:14, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
268391 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268389 +++$+++ 268390 +++$+++ 2008-07-30 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.217456880E09 +++$+++ I just looked through all the Time magazine articles in your references. It was this one: http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/magazine\/article\/0,9171,900149,00.html that gives the ABC time sequesnce. &mdash; +++$+++ ::I just looked through all the Time magazine articles in your references. It was this one: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,900149,00.html that gives the ABC time sequesnce. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

6246 +++$+++ WillC +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6246 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-15 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.250391600E09 +++$+++ it did not belong that far up....it neither defined his life nor was he a key player in the history of slavery.  +++$+++ it did not belong that far up....it neither defined his life nor was he a key player in the history of slavery. [[User:WillC|WillC]] ([[User talk:WillC|talk]]) 20:00, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
6247 +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6246 +++$+++ 6246 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.250708760E09 +++$+++ While we are grateful for your opinion, the secondary source -- the report by Brown University on Braxton's role is more usable in encyclopedia article.  +++$+++ :While we are grateful for your opinion, the secondary source -- the report by Brown University on Braxton's role is more usable in encyclopedia article. [[User:Skywriter|Skywriter]] ([[User talk:Skywriter#top|talk]]) 12:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

530535 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530535 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-21 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.248206220E09 +++$+++ I understand you have an interest in April Fool's DYK. Question: IF I were to submit an article (i.e. ...that Wikipedia has an article on [[everything]] (already done before, but used here for idea concept)) do I submit it under the day created (i.e. Aug 1, 2009) asking for it to be held for April 1, 2010? OR, do I submit it at [[Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page\/Did You Know]] at Suggestions in the first place (by-passing the normal DYK day created) and list it above the existing suggestion of [[EME (communications)]]? THEN, does the 5 day Rule still apply? The article I have in mind will DEFINITELY be a new article altogether and ''not'' an expansion from any stub. You can answer here on '''your''' Talk page, as I have a watch on it. Thanks.-- +++$+++ I understand you have an interest in April Fool's DYK. Question: IF I were to submit an article (i.e. ...that Wikipedia has an article on [[everything]] (already done before, but used here for idea concept)) do I submit it under the day created (i.e. Aug 1, 2009) asking for it to be held for April 1, 2010? OR, do I submit it at [[Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know]] at Suggestions in the first place (by-passing the normal DYK day created) and list it above the existing suggestion of [[EME (communications)]]? THEN, does the 5 day Rule still apply? The article I have in mind will DEFINITELY be a new article altogether and ''not'' an expansion from any stub. You can answer here on '''your''' Talk page, as I have a watch on it. Thanks.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 12:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
530536 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530535 +++$+++ 530535 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.248243180E09 +++$+++ I keep getting accused of be \"in charge\" of April Fool's Day. An April Fool's Day article would only need to be submitted at [[Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page\/Did You Know]]. There no reason to submit it in with the normal noms. The 5 day rule has been waived for the last several years. So people started a petition to make everyone wait with DYK April Fool's noms until a certain date, after which any nom (even from earlier creation\/expansions) would be accepted. Don't worry about, just nom it when you get done. I have the page on my watchlist, so I'll comment if there's a problem to give you time to add it to the regular DYK noms. Please add noms at the bottom, and use the form from the regular DYK noms. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I keep getting accused of be "in charge" of April Fool's Day. An April Fool's Day article would only need to be submitted at [[Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know]]. There no reason to submit it in with the normal noms. The 5 day rule has been waived for the last several years. So people started a petition to make everyone wait with DYK April Fool's noms until a certain date, after which any nom (even from earlier creation/expansions) would be accepted. Don't worry about, just nom it when you get done. I have the page on my watchlist, so I'll comment if there's a problem to give you time to add it to the regular DYK noms. Please add noms at the bottom, and use the form from the regular DYK noms. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
530537 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530535 +++$+++ 530536 +++$+++ 2009-07-22 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.248288300E09 +++$+++ Great. Now I understand when and where to nom it. That was most useful information. I see you also do a lot of DYKs, and write a lot of new articles. IF (big \"if) you have time perhaps you can make some comments for inprovments for the article. I'll have a good 6 months to continue to expand and improve it, with others participation (hopefully). I'll have it up before August.-- +++$+++ ::Great. Now I understand when and where to nom it. That was most useful information. I see you also do a lot of DYKs, and write a lot of new articles. IF (big "if) you have time perhaps you can make some comments for inprovments for the article. I'll have a good 6 months to continue to expand and improve it, with others participation (hopefully). I'll have it up before August.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 11:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
530538 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530535 +++$+++ 530536 +++$+++ 2009-07-22 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.248295380E09 +++$+++ P.S. Keep in mind the article will be about astronomy. -- +++$+++ ::P.S. Keep in mind the article will be about astronomy. --[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 13:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
530539 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530535 +++$+++ 530538 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.248337140E09 +++$+++ I '''LOVE''' astronomy! However, I only understand it at the level of someone who took 2 college classes (because that's all they offered). I don't know how you could expand it besides finding books\/magazines\/newspaper articles on the topic. It certainly needs to be referenced. I usually do either biographies or articles on museums\/buildings\/historic places. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::I '''LOVE''' astronomy! However, I only understand it at the level of someone who took 2 college classes (because that's all they offered). I don't know how you could expand it besides finding books/magazines/newspaper articles on the topic. It certainly needs to be referenced. I usually do either biographies or articles on museums/buildings/historic places. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

268393 +++$+++ Compson1 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-31 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.217493480E09 +++$+++ I corrected a couple of errors in my earlier comments.  I don't mean to make a mountain out of a molehill, but Time's timing is incorrect.  A have a recording of several hours of ABC's coverage beginning before Kennedy spoke, and ABC was not showing the Ambassador two minutes after the shooting.  You may have been watching local coverage on the ABC affiliate, and it may have interrupted its broadcast to switch to ABC for what looked like a bulletin. On ABC's national broadcast, Smith signed off and they then held the studio shot for four and a half minutes while an announcer said, \"Please stand by.\"  During that time, ABC was waiting for a second report of the shooting to support information from its own people.  Television was more careful then.  The broadcast then resumed and Smith advised viewers:  \"Ladies and gentlemen, we've kept the air on because we've heard an alarming report that Robert Kennedy was shot in that ballroom at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles.\"  Smith broke that news almost seven minutes after Kennedy finished speaking, about five minutes after the shooting.  About a minute and a half after Smith first reported the shooting, ABC switched to a camera in the ballroom {not the pantry) and a minute later picked up audio from Karl George in the pantry.  ABC definitely beat NBC on the air with the news (I can't time NBC precisely because my copy of NBC's coverage doesn't include Kennedy's speach, but 12:26 sounds about right for its first report of the shooting--four or five minutes after ABC), though NBC provided impressive coverage with its considerable resources in those days of Huntley-Brinkley, Frank McGee, Sander Vanocur, etc.   +++$+++ I corrected a couple of errors in my earlier comments.  I don't mean to make a mountain out of a molehill, but Time's timing is incorrect.  A have a recording of several hours of ABC's coverage beginning before Kennedy spoke, and ABC was not showing the Ambassador two minutes after the shooting.  You may have been watching local coverage on the ABC affiliate, and it may have interrupted its broadcast to switch to ABC for what looked like a bulletin. On ABC's national broadcast, Smith signed off and they then held the studio shot for four and a half minutes while an announcer said, "Please stand by."  During that time, ABC was waiting for a second report of the shooting to support information from its own people.  Television was more careful then.  The broadcast then resumed and Smith advised viewers:  "Ladies and gentlemen, we've kept the air on because we've heard an alarming report that Robert Kennedy was shot in that ballroom at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles."  Smith broke that news almost seven minutes after Kennedy finished speaking, about five minutes after the shooting.  About a minute and a half after Smith first reported the shooting, ABC switched to a camera in the ballroom {not the pantry) and a minute later picked up audio from Karl George in the pantry.  ABC definitely beat NBC on the air with the news (I can't time NBC precisely because my copy of NBC's coverage doesn't include Kennedy's speach, but 12:26 sounds about right for its first report of the shooting--four or five minutes after ABC), though NBC provided impressive coverage with its considerable resources in those days of Huntley-Brinkley, Frank McGee, Sander Vanocur, etc.  [[User:Compson1|Compson1]] ([[User talk:Compson1|talk]]) 01:38, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
268394 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268393 +++$+++ 268393 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.217533260E09 +++$+++ If you have done such comprehensive research, then undoubtedly you are right. I, of course, just remember the effects on me and not the specifics that you have provided. Since ''Time'' is so wrong, perhaps you should not use it as a reference for the article as it is probably incorrect in other ways as well.  &mdash; +++$+++ :If you have done such comprehensive research, then undoubtedly you are right. I, of course, just remember the effects on me and not the specifics that you have provided. Since ''Time'' is so wrong, perhaps you should not use it as a reference for the article as it is probably incorrect in other ways as well.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

6251 +++$+++ Jezhotwells +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6251 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-05 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.262757240E09 +++$+++ <div class=\"floatleft\" style=\"margin-bottom:0\">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]<\/div>An article that you have been involved in editing, [[The Ku Klux Klan In Prophecy]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]].  If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/{{str trim|The Ku Klux Klan In Prophecy}}]].  Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw -->   +++$+++ <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, [[The Ku Klux Klan In Prophecy]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]].  If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/{{str trim|The Ku Klux Klan In Prophecy}}]].  Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw -->  [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 21:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
6252 +++$+++ Floquenbeam +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6251 +++$+++ 6251 +++$+++ 2010-01-07 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.262935620E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure if you read my response to your post on my talk page a day or two ago, so I'll say it here.  Since I also favor merging the material, I would appreciate it if you would tone down the claim that Buz lightning is some kind of proponent of Alma White's POV.  If you actually read what he has written in the articles, instead of making assumptions based only on their subject matter, you would see that he is not.  It makes the rest of us who agree with merging the material look bad by association. The cool thing to do would be to refactor your comments and apologize to him, but at the very least, please don't do it anymore. -- +++$+++ :I'm not sure if you read my response to your post on my talk page a day or two ago, so I'll say it here.  Since I also favor merging the material, I would appreciate it if you would tone down the claim that Buz lightning is some kind of proponent of Alma White's POV.  If you actually read what he has written in the articles, instead of making assumptions based only on their subject matter, you would see that he is not.  It makes the rest of us who agree with merging the material look bad by association. The cool thing to do would be to refactor your comments and apologize to him, but at the very least, please don't do it anymore. --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 23:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

530542 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-28 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.248801540E09 +++$+++ ... questions at [[Talk:List of Daytona 500 pole position winners]].  I think it's getting close, and I'm sure it's much better now than it was 2 months ago. ;)  Sorry it's taken me so long to get it referenced, not an easy task. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ... questions at [[Talk:List of Daytona 500 pole position winners]].  I think it's getting close, and I'm sure it's much better now than it was 2 months ago. ;)  Sorry it's taken me so long to get it referenced, not an easy task. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 10:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
530543 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530542 +++$+++ 530542 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.248840120E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I might sandbox the lead and procedure section.  There's something there that just doesn't quite sound right, but I can't put my finger on it.  I spent 3 hours trying to find a ref for the 1960 item, and I'm still not sure why Owens started 1st, and Roberts 3rd.  I know Roberts even won his qualifier - not sure why he wasn't on the pole.  Sometimes that old stuff can be tough to track down, but I'll keep digging.  Cheers \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :Thanks.  I might sandbox the lead and procedure section.  There's something there that just doesn't quite sound right, but I can't put my finger on it.  I spent 3 hours trying to find a ref for the 1960 item, and I'm still not sure why Owens started 1st, and Roberts 3rd.  I know Roberts even won his qualifier - not sure why he wasn't on the pole.  Sometimes that old stuff can be tough to track down, but I'll keep digging.  Cheers — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 21:02, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
530544 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530542 +++$+++ 530543 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.248851820E09 +++$+++ I don't know if this helps... In the first 1959 Daytona 500, one row was Grand National cars and the other row was [[NASCAR Convertible Division]] drivers. That's why there are 2 qualifiers. The Convertible article has details and a reference. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I don't know if this helps... In the first 1959 Daytona 500, one row was Grand National cars and the other row was [[NASCAR Convertible Division]] drivers. That's why there are 2 qualifiers. The Convertible article has details and a reference. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
530545 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530542 +++$+++ 530544 +++$+++ 2009-07-30 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.248955680E09 +++$+++ I found a good ref for the restrictor plate sizes through 2008 (still need to dig one up for 09).  I moved those 2 sections to the talk page.  Right now, I think a good going over the lead and \"Procedure\" section as a final scrub-up might be called for.  Don't know if you're interested in doing that, asking S&W to look, ... maybe it needs a complete re-write - I'll leave that part up to you for now.  Those early 60's notes I haven't been able to find any concrete wp:rs for yet.  I think some of it has to do with the fact that before 71 they counted for points - but that's OR at this point, so I can't really put anything other than what is there into the article. I think we're pretty darn close though.  What do you think?  \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :::I found a good ref for the restrictor plate sizes through 2008 (still need to dig one up for 09).  I moved those 2 sections to the talk page.  Right now, I think a good going over the lead and "Procedure" section as a final scrub-up might be called for.  Don't know if you're interested in doing that, asking S&W to look, ... maybe it needs a complete re-write - I'll leave that part up to you for now.  Those early 60's notes I haven't been able to find any concrete wp:rs for yet.  I think some of it has to do with the fact that before 71 they counted for points - but that's OR at this point, so I can't really put anything other than what is there into the article. I think we're pretty darn close though.  What do you think?  — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 05:08, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

6256 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-11 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.263278160E09 +++$+++ ...why not take full advantage of that fact? Why undermine yourself? Wouldn't it be better not to do that? Come on, make it easy for me to support you. - +++$+++ ...why not take full advantage of that fact? Why undermine yourself? Wouldn't it be better not to do that? Come on, make it easy for me to support you. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 22:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
6257 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6256 +++$+++ 6256 +++$+++ 2010-01-22 06:54:00 +++$+++ 1.264172040E09 +++$+++ I'm ready to work with you. See detailed reply at my talk page. If you think the thing's non-notable, you can pursue the time-wasting strategy, or the time-saving strategy. Up to you. - +++$+++ :I'm ready to work with you. See detailed reply at my talk page. If you think the thing's non-notable, you can pursue the time-wasting strategy, or the time-saving strategy. Up to you. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 06:54, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

268401 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-29 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.217314980E09 +++$+++ You voiced an opinion against choice #1, without saying which of the other three choices you feel is appropriate.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ You voiced an opinion against choice #1, without saying which of the other three choices you feel is appropriate.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 00:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
268402 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ 2008-07-29 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.217387160E09 +++$+++ Do you feel that there are any unresolved issues related to [[WP:WIAFA]] and am I near getting your support if there are not.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :Do you feel that there are any unresolved issues related to [[WP:WIAFA]] and am I near getting your support if there are not.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 20:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
268403 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ 268402 +++$+++ 2008-07-29 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.217387880E09 +++$+++ I have a big problem with the prose. From my point of view, this article has more potential than the Trump Tower one, as it is innately more interesting. But you need someone to go in there and straighten out the prose. &mdash; +++$+++ ::I have a big problem with the prose. From my point of view, this article has more potential than the Trump Tower one, as it is innately more interesting. But you need someone to go in there and straighten out the prose. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
268404 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ 268403 +++$+++ 2008-07-30 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.217412960E09 +++$+++ This if FAC3, I have been through 2 PRs.  I am trying to get help.  It does seem however, that you are concerned with stylistic issues more than grammatical ones.  I have seen many an FAC get passed that could use stylistic improvement.  Also, that is so vague a problem I am not sure if it is actionable.  However, could you kindly strike or cap any of our banter which has resulted in a resolved concern.  Please note you did not respond to my compromise American public fountain or to the bold '''CLARIFICATION''' in the discussion.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::This if FAC3, I have been through 2 PRs.  I am trying to get help.  It does seem however, that you are concerned with stylistic issues more than grammatical ones.  I have seen many an FAC get passed that could use stylistic improvement.  Also, that is so vague a problem I am not sure if it is actionable.  However, could you kindly strike or cap any of our banter which has resulted in a resolved concern.  Please note you did not respond to my compromise American public fountain or to the bold '''CLARIFICATION''' in the discussion.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 03:16, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
268405 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ 268404 +++$+++ 2008-07-30 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.217455200E09 +++$+++ Please include the talk page items in the FAC discussion.  Some are actionable and some are not.  I did not see a copyedit offer.  Please point it out to me.  Also note my clearer argument on community areas, which you have not responded to and about America\/United States that you have not responded to.  I think you may wish to cap the discussion on reworking the praise for the fountain and hope you agree with the rearrangement of American as well.  I am not sure why you are against the Library of Congress convention on describing where the fountain is, but you continue to argue about whether describing its location is New York v. Chicago boosterism, which seems non-sequitur to me.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::Please include the talk page items in the FAC discussion.  Some are actionable and some are not.  I did not see a copyedit offer.  Please point it out to me.  Also note my clearer argument on community areas, which you have not responded to and about America/United States that you have not responded to.  I think you may wish to cap the discussion on reworking the praise for the fountain and hope you agree with the rearrangement of American as well.  I am not sure why you are against the Library of Congress convention on describing where the fountain is, but you continue to argue about whether describing its location is New York v. Chicago boosterism, which seems non-sequitur to me.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 15:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
268406 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ 268405 +++$+++ 2008-08-02 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.217680800E09 +++$+++ Is it possible for you to strike or cap your comments so I can know what outstanding issues you have with the article.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::::Is it possible for you to strike or cap your comments so I can know what outstanding issues you have with the article.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 05:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
268407 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ 268406 +++$+++ 2008-08-02 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.217740560E09 +++$+++ I only have about 45 minutes online.  I just got back from a day of being Tony The Tiger at the beach with all my martial arts stuff.  I am going to go downtown tonight to see the [[Grant Park Music Festival]] because it is being held at the [[Harris Theater (Chicago)]] tonight.  I think [[Lollapalooza]] is using the [[Jay Pritzker Pavilion]] tonight.  I hope to spend some time at [[Crown Fountain]] at night tonight.   I have to jump in the shower in about 45 minutes. Maybe tonight or tomorrow I will spend more time.  I don't know how extensive the new problems are.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::::I only have about 45 minutes online.  I just got back from a day of being Tony The Tiger at the beach with all my martial arts stuff.  I am going to go downtown tonight to see the [[Grant Park Music Festival]] because it is being held at the [[Harris Theater (Chicago)]] tonight.  I think [[Lollapalooza]] is using the [[Jay Pritzker Pavilion]] tonight.  I hope to spend some time at [[Crown Fountain]] at night tonight.   I have to jump in the shower in about 45 minutes. Maybe tonight or tomorrow I will spend more time.  I don't know how extensive the new problems are.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 22:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
268408 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ 268407 +++$+++ 2008-08-02 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.217742240E09 +++$+++ Anything I don't get to by the top of the hour you can feel free to take a stab at.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::::::Anything I don't get to by the top of the hour you can feel free to take a stab at.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 22:44, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
268409 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ 268408 +++$+++ 2008-08-02 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.217742780E09 +++$+++ I think there is some T-bar commentary in the discussion already.  It does not have an article to explain it and I am not an engineer.  It is refed by a citation that uses the term and that is about all I can say.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::::::I think there is some T-bar commentary in the discussion already.  It does not have an article to explain it and I am not an engineer.  It is refed by a citation that uses the term and that is about all I can say.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 22:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
268410 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ 2008-08-05 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.217990460E09 +++$+++ Do you still stand by this statement \"sections have been mixed up and do not keep to topic.\"--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :Do you still stand by this statement "sections have been mixed up and do not keep to topic."--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 19:41, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
268411 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268401 +++$+++ 268410 +++$+++ 2008-08-05 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.217995560E09 +++$+++ Since you mixed  up  the section contents again, I have not read the article through. Let me rest up first. Also, wasn't there an editor who suggested something about the structure today? (I cannot find his comments on the actual FAC page, but I saw them on my watchlist. His name started with R. Seems like he had some good suggestions about combining some of the little sections. Did you follow his advice?)  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Since you mixed  up  the section contents again, I have not read the article through. Let me rest up first. Also, wasn't there an editor who suggested something about the structure today? (I cannot find his comments on the actual FAC page, but I saw them on my watchlist. His name started with R. Seems like he had some good suggestions about combining some of the little sections. Did you follow his advice?)  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

530546 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530546 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-31 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.249024440E09 +++$+++ \u2190Wow, this is pretty formal stuff.  I've just been reading through [[WP:FLC]], [[WP:FL?]], and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Dispenser\/Checklinks\/config this tool].  Am I right in saying that ''you'll'' be the one who actually ''submits'' the list? \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ←Wow, this is pretty formal stuff.  I've just been reading through [[WP:FLC]], [[WP:FL?]], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dispenser/Checklinks/config this tool].  Am I right in saying that ''you'll'' be the one who actually ''submits'' the list? — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 00:14, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
530547 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530546 +++$+++ 530546 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.249024500E09 +++$+++ PS - if you do, don't forget me and Doc ;) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :PS - if you do, don't forget me and Doc ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 00:15, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
530548 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530546 +++$+++ 530547 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.249027980E09 +++$+++ As for the nomination, I think it should come from you. You would be a better defender since you've been immersed in it. I haven't done very much so far. Let's see how much I get in to it before we nominate it. I'm happy to stand by your side no matter what. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::As for the nomination, I think it should come from you. You would be a better defender since you've been immersed in it. I haven't done very much so far. Let's see how much I get in to it before we nominate it. I'm happy to stand by your side no matter what. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

6260 +++$+++ Binksternet +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-11 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.268295360E09 +++$+++ Thank you, [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]])  +++$+++ Thank you, [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 00:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
6261 +++$+++ Xavexgoem +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6260 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-20 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.269079800E09 +++$+++ ''For the Mediation Committee,'' '''[[User:Seddon|Seddon]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Seddon|talk]]<\/sup> and  +++$+++ ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' '''[[User:Seddon|Seddon]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Seddon|talk]]</sup> and [[User:Xavexgoem|Xavexgoem]] ([[User talk:Xavexgoem|talk]]) 03:10, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

530549 +++$+++ ChildofMidnight +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-06 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.249544880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for fixing that up for me. I'm working on getting a photo so you can see what the restaurants looked like. :)  Chili is a very important subject. Speaking of which, the newest thing in bacon is a 50\/50 burger. Now you know.  +++$+++ Thanks for fixing that up for me. I'm working on getting a photo so you can see what the restaurants looked like. :)  Chili is a very important subject. Speaking of which, the newest thing in bacon is a 50/50 burger. Now you know. [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 00:48, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
530550 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530549 +++$+++ 530549 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.249544940E09 +++$+++ Just when I thought my knowledge was complete, you tell me something that I didn't know. Thanks! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Just when I thought my knowledge was complete, you tell me something that I didn't know. Thanks! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:49, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

530551 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530551 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-06 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.249584660E09 +++$+++ Hi! Help! I was trying to get into the category:Unincorporated communities in Wisconsin and all I got was:'Function override' what ever that means.I wanted to check it out to see if there was new articles on unincorporated communities in Wisconsin. Thanks as always- +++$+++ Hi! Help! I was trying to get into the category:Unincorporated communities in Wisconsin and all I got was:'Function override' what ever that means.I wanted to check it out to see if there was new articles on unincorporated communities in Wisconsin. Thanks as always-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 11:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
530552 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530551 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.249585860E09 +++$+++ I got that error message numerous times last night too. It worked when I hit the back button and redid whatever I was doing. Probably a bug somewhere or some server issues. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I got that error message numerous times last night too. It worked when I hit the back button and redid whatever I was doing. Probably a bug somewhere or some server issues. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

6265 +++$+++ BoogaLouie +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6265 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-13 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.271215920E09 +++$+++ Do you have any [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Abadan_Crisis_timeline#Problems_with_article reply]? According to the people at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Drive-by_tags Village Pump] you can't tag an article and not give actionable reasons as to why you tagged it. -- +++$+++ Do you have any [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Abadan_Crisis_timeline#Problems_with_article reply]? According to the people at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Drive-by_tags Village Pump] you can't tag an article and not give actionable reasons as to why you tagged it. --[[User:BoogaLouie|BoogaLouie]] ([[User talk:BoogaLouie|talk]]) 20:32, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
6266 +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6265 +++$+++ 6265 +++$+++ 2010-04-13 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.271216700E09 +++$+++ Here's one example among many. Defections reduce Mosaddeq's ability \"to organize crowds in the streets.\" [44] You have distorted what p. 233 states. Like so many items in this timeline, you have added your spin and twisted words to a non-neutral viewpoint. I am not going to go through this article and fact-check all of your spin. If you want the tags removed, you must work toward transparency and verifiability. What you include must accurately be reflected in the sources that are quoted.  +++$+++ :Here's one example among many. Defections reduce Mosaddeq's ability "to organize crowds in the streets." [44] You have distorted what p. 233 states. Like so many items in this timeline, you have added your spin and twisted words to a non-neutral viewpoint. I am not going to go through this article and fact-check all of your spin. If you want the tags removed, you must work toward transparency and verifiability. What you include must accurately be reflected in the sources that are quoted. [[User:Skywriter|Skywriter]] ([[User talk:Skywriter#top|talk]]) 20:45, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
6267 +++$+++  +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6265 +++$+++ 6266 +++$+++ 2010-04-13 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.271218380E09 +++$+++ Second, your claims raises other questions. \"I am not going to go through this article and fact-check all of the spin inserted by this particular editor who has a long history of doing this sort of thing. If the editor wants the tags removed, the editor must work toward transparency and verifiability.\" Are you saying there just must be problems with accuracy, neutrality, quality in the article because I contributed a lot to it and you don't need to know exactly what is wrong with it? Or that until I change my unspecified \"transparency and verifiability\" to your satisfaction you won't say where exactly (you feel) the problems with accuracy, neutrality, quality are in the article? --BoogaLouie (talk) 21:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ ::Second, your claims raises other questions. "I am not going to go through this article and fact-check all of the spin inserted by this particular editor who has a long history of doing this sort of thing. If the editor wants the tags removed, the editor must work toward transparency and verifiability." Are you saying there just must be problems with accuracy, neutrality, quality in the article because I contributed a lot to it and you don't need to know exactly what is wrong with it? Or that until I change my unspecified "transparency and verifiability" to your satisfaction you won't say where exactly (you feel) the problems with accuracy, neutrality, quality are in the article? --BoogaLouie (talk) 21:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
6268 +++$+++  +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6265 +++$+++ 6266 +++$+++ 2010-04-14 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.271296680E09 +++$+++ If you don't start explaining what is wrong with the article by tomorrow morning I will delete the tags. --BoogaLouie (talk) 18:58, 14 April 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ ::If you don't start explaining what is wrong with the article by tomorrow morning I will delete the tags. --BoogaLouie (talk) 18:58, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

268412 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268412 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-05 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.217935380E09 +++$+++ If you see chart positions formatted incorrectly in the prose of any Featured Article, feel free to go ahead and fix them. I distinctly recall fixing the formatting in [[Radiohead]] and [[Nine Inch Nails]], but not everyone is familiar with the manual of style for chart positions, so occasional fixes need to be made. Also, important to keep in mind is that all numbers ten and lesser should be written out (\"reached number two on the ''Billboard'' charts\") unless in a series. Check out [[WP:MOS]] for other things you want to make sure are taken care of in [[Frank Zappa]]. I'll take a stab at restructuring the article sometime soon.  +++$+++ If you see chart positions formatted incorrectly in the prose of any Featured Article, feel free to go ahead and fix them. I distinctly recall fixing the formatting in [[Radiohead]] and [[Nine Inch Nails]], but not everyone is familiar with the manual of style for chart positions, so occasional fixes need to be made. Also, important to keep in mind is that all numbers ten and lesser should be written out ("reached number two on the ''Billboard'' charts") unless in a series. Check out [[WP:MOS]] for other things you want to make sure are taken care of in [[Frank Zappa]]. I'll take a stab at restructuring the article sometime soon. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 04:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
268413 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268412 +++$+++ 268412 +++$+++ 2008-08-05 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.217964060E09 +++$+++ It turns out there is no consistant answer in MoS. I asked [[User talk:Epbr123]], the MoS guru, and he is said there was not. He susggest asking at [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)]] so I did: [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Question on #1 vs number one]]. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :It turns out there is no consistant answer in MoS. I asked [[User talk:Epbr123]], the MoS guru, and he is said there was not. He susggest asking at [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)]] so I did: [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Question on #1 vs number one]]. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
268414 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268412 +++$+++ 268412 +++$+++ 2008-08-09 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.218326040E09 +++$+++ Let me know if this helps. I'm not an expert on the citation template but perhaps I can help you figure it out.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Let me know if this helps. I'm not an expert on the citation template but perhaps I can help you figure it out.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:54, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

6269 +++$+++ BoogaLouie +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-14 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.271285100E09 +++$+++ For example, I had no idea what this complaint above refered to until I remembered being called [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat#Lead BoogaLuise], not by you, but by Kurdo. (I know, big deal, but it was part of a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts\/archive84#Latest_less-than-civil_comment_by_User_talk:Skywriter_connected_to_1953_Iranian_coup_d.27.C3.A9tat_article pattern] that was starting to wear me down.)  If you had shown where the \"not spelling his pen name correctly\" happened, I could have replied and maybe cleared the issue up. -- +++$+++ For example, I had no idea what this complaint above refered to until I remembered being called [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat#Lead BoogaLuise], not by you, but by Kurdo. (I know, big deal, but it was part of a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts/archive84#Latest_less-than-civil_comment_by_User_talk:Skywriter_connected_to_1953_Iranian_coup_d.27.C3.A9tat_article pattern] that was starting to wear me down.)  If you had shown where the "not spelling his pen name correctly" happened, I could have replied and maybe cleared the issue up. --[[User:BoogaLouie|BoogaLouie]] ([[User talk:BoogaLouie|talk]]) 15:45, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
6270 +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6269 +++$+++ 6269 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.271347680E09 +++$+++ You filed an accusation against me, not another editor, claiming I misspelled your pen name. I have no idea whether there was a typo. It is your claim, not mine. Presumably you have the link. I try not to make spelling errors, but sometimes I do. Why are you mis-using this talk page to argue about this sort of thing? This page is to discuss article content, not personal grievances or typos. The subject is '''1953 coup in Iran'''.  +++$+++ :You filed an accusation against me, not another editor, claiming I misspelled your pen name. I have no idea whether there was a typo. It is your claim, not mine. Presumably you have the link. I try not to make spelling errors, but sometimes I do. Why are you mis-using this talk page to argue about this sort of thing? This page is to discuss article content, not personal grievances or typos. The subject is '''1953 coup in Iran'''. [[User:Skywriter|Skywriter]] ([[User talk:Skywriter|talk]]) 09:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
6271 +++$+++ BoogaLouie +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6269 +++$+++ 6270 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.271370240E09 +++$+++ The post above is a suggestion to use links so when you (or other editors) think another editor has done wrong you can link to the alleged wrong and there won't be any misunderstanding. Yes, I made a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts\/archive84#User_talk:Kurdo777_and_User_talk:Skywriter_and_less-than-civil_comments_connected_to_1953_Iranian_coup_d.27.C3.A9tat_articlecivility complaint] against you and kurdo about a bunch of comments (\"your cherry picking skills ...trivial character assassinations ... a new low for you Booga ... your addiction to micromanagement ... If you have a low tolerance for change, try something else. In any case, Get A Grip. For Your Own Sake.\") on the [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts]]. To the best of my knowledge the \"typo\" of my wikiname you are refering to (\"BoogaLuise\") was by Kurdo, not you. Did I miss something? Are you talking about something else? -- +++$+++ ::The post above is a suggestion to use links so when you (or other editors) think another editor has done wrong you can link to the alleged wrong and there won't be any misunderstanding. Yes, I made a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts/archive84#User_talk:Kurdo777_and_User_talk:Skywriter_and_less-than-civil_comments_connected_to_1953_Iranian_coup_d.27.C3.A9tat_articlecivility complaint] against you and kurdo about a bunch of comments ("your cherry picking skills ...trivial character assassinations ... a new low for you Booga ... your addiction to micromanagement ... If you have a low tolerance for change, try something else. In any case, Get A Grip. For Your Own Sake.") on the [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts]]. To the best of my knowledge the "typo" of my wikiname you are refering to ("BoogaLuise") was by Kurdo, not you. Did I miss something? Are you talking about something else? --[[User:BoogaLouie|BoogaLouie]] ([[User talk:BoogaLouie|talk]]) 15:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

6272 +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-15 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.271376960E09 +++$+++ The above material is inappropriate for article talk page. Please do not clutter article talk page with stuff like this. Thank you. +++$+++ The above material is inappropriate for article talk page. Please do not clutter article talk page with stuff like this. Thank you.[[User:Skywriter|Skywriter]] ([[User talk:Skywriter|talk]]) 17:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
6273 +++$+++ BoogaLouie +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6272 +++$+++ 6272 +++$+++ 2010-04-20 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.271813880E09 +++$+++ It may or may not be appropriate for an article talk page, but it deserves an answer. -- +++$+++ :It may or may not be appropriate for an article talk page, but it deserves an answer. --[[User:BoogaLouie|BoogaLouie]] ([[User talk:BoogaLouie|talk]]) 18:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
6274 +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6272 +++$+++ 6273 +++$+++ 2010-04-20 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.271831460E09 +++$+++ On the playground when little kids start publicly attacking other kids --even for stuff the other kids didn't do like typos)-- grownups suggest the kid who is yelling needs a nap.  +++$+++ ::On the playground when little kids start publicly attacking other kids --even for stuff the other kids didn't do like typos)-- grownups suggest the kid who is yelling needs a nap. [[User:Skywriter|Skywriter]] ([[User talk:Skywriter|talk]]) 23:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
6275 +++$+++ BoogaLouie +++$+++ Skywriter +++$+++ 6272 +++$+++ 6274 +++$+++ 2010-04-21 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.271903040E09 +++$+++ Skywriter, WHERE IS this complaint about the typo???? I do not think I made any such complaint, and in all your posts about it you have furnished no evidence it exists. -- +++$+++ :::Skywriter, WHERE IS this complaint about the typo???? I do not think I made any such complaint, and in all your posts about it you have furnished no evidence it exists. --[[User:BoogaLouie|BoogaLouie]] ([[User talk:BoogaLouie#top|talk]]) 19:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

268418 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-13 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.218679260E09 +++$+++ Matisse, I can understand that you are frustrated and disappointed by the archival of the FAC nomination for [[Frank Zappa]].  You are doing your cause absolutely no good, however, in disparaging the FAC reviewers.  We are only human, and, while I can't speak for all the reviewers, when I feel attacked by a nominator or article supporter, in the future I'm likely  going to avoid articles where that person is involved.  Why should I spend my time reviewing articles when if I say something someone disagrees with I'll be essentially attacked? Your comments maintaining that there is a clique\/a cabal\/a huge conspiracy of teenagers to trash excellent articles are insulting.  Please [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] and [[WP:CIVIL|remain civil]].  '''Constructive criticism''' is a good thing (give suggestions for improvement).  Levelling baseless accusations is not.  It may be helpful to avoid posting about FAC for a few days until you calm down.   +++$+++ Matisse, I can understand that you are frustrated and disappointed by the archival of the FAC nomination for [[Frank Zappa]].  You are doing your cause absolutely no good, however, in disparaging the FAC reviewers.  We are only human, and, while I can't speak for all the reviewers, when I feel attacked by a nominator or article supporter, in the future I'm likely  going to avoid articles where that person is involved.  Why should I spend my time reviewing articles when if I say something someone disagrees with I'll be essentially attacked? Your comments maintaining that there is a clique/a cabal/a huge conspiracy of teenagers to trash excellent articles are insulting.  Please [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] and [[WP:CIVIL|remain civil]].  '''Constructive criticism''' is a good thing (give suggestions for improvement).  Levelling baseless accusations is not.  It may be helpful to avoid posting about FAC for a few days until you calm down.  [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 19:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
268419 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268418 +++$+++ 268418 +++$+++ 2008-08-13 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.218680340E09 +++$+++ It is not just Frank Zappa, or primarily Frank Zappa. In fact, I will urge that editor not to resubmit it.  I have been watching the process for quite a while, for a year at least, since the [[User:Zleitzen]] episode near two years ago. And for a while I helped a particular editor get a string of FAs.   He had his supporters lined up, including admins, so there was never any problem with those. I have helped many editors get FAs. So I am not dumb about how the process works. Who did I attack now? You? It is not permissible to have critical feeling about the FAC process? It's not politically correct, are you saying, to point out that most articles are on pop culture, just on pop culture for the under 30.   Feel free to avoid anything I have anything to do with in the future FAs.  If I want to sabotage an article I will be sure to get involved. (I'm counting on you now to keep your word! It does explain why it's all so bland. Everyone is scared, it seems  you are saying. And that rings true. I have seen the revenge in action. )  FAC is not a very welcoming place to outsiders. I gave up a while ago to be treated decently by FAC brass no matter how much work I put in. I have done a whole heck of a lot of copy editing for FAC. But no more.  Thanks!  &mdash; +++$+++ :It is not just Frank Zappa, or primarily Frank Zappa. In fact, I will urge that editor not to resubmit it.  I have been watching the process for quite a while, for a year at least, since the [[User:Zleitzen]] episode near two years ago. And for a while I helped a particular editor get a string of FAs.   He had his supporters lined up, including admins, so there was never any problem with those. I have helped many editors get FAs. So I am not dumb about how the process works. Who did I attack now? You? It is not permissible to have critical feeling about the FAC process? It's not politically correct, are you saying, to point out that most articles are on pop culture, just on pop culture for the under 30.   Feel free to avoid anything I have anything to do with in the future FAs.  If I want to sabotage an article I will be sure to get involved. (I'm counting on you now to keep your word! It does explain why it's all so bland. Everyone is scared, it seems  you are saying. And that rings true. I have seen the revenge in action. )  FAC is not a very welcoming place to outsiders. I gave up a while ago to be treated decently by FAC brass no matter how much work I put in. I have done a whole heck of a lot of copy editing for FAC. But no more.  Thanks!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
268420 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268418 +++$+++ 268419 +++$+++ 2008-08-14 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.218762120E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I know little about your past experiences at FAC, and I'm sorry that they have apparently made you so bitter, but it's not right for you to be tarring all FAC reviewers as essentially immature, mean, ignorant, and led by an evil dictator.  Reviewers have to put up with a lot of flak for offering an opinion even though the nominator is soliciting those opinions by nominating the article. Reviewers are volunteers just like the nominators, who review what they are interested in when they have time to review.  I am not denying that FAC may be overdue for some changes, but changes usually don't come along as a result of a negativity campaign.  Please, please, please, if you have constructive ideas on how to improve the process, offer them!  I'll be more than happy to help you introduce workable change to the process, but first we need the improvement ideas.  +++$+++ ::Mattisse, I know little about your past experiences at FAC, and I'm sorry that they have apparently made you so bitter, but it's not right for you to be tarring all FAC reviewers as essentially immature, mean, ignorant, and led by an evil dictator.  Reviewers have to put up with a lot of flak for offering an opinion even though the nominator is soliciting those opinions by nominating the article. Reviewers are volunteers just like the nominators, who review what they are interested in when they have time to review.  I am not denying that FAC may be overdue for some changes, but changes usually don't come along as a result of a negativity campaign.  Please, please, please, if you have constructive ideas on how to improve the process, offer them!  I'll be more than happy to help you introduce workable change to the process, but first we need the improvement ideas. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 18:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

268421 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-18 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.219104120E09 +++$+++ Our discussion over the past few days has allowed me to clarify my thoughts about wikipedia, and hopefully will help you to see a positive and personally fulfilling way that you can continue to contribute as well. WikiDragons and WikiHermits both need caves to live in, and that's what I've found WikiProjects to be. You can make a far greater difference at GA than you ever could at FAC, which really has become an outstanding example of the law of diminishing returns. Subject specfic projects can help a great deal as well. I'd have left wikipedia in disgust ages ago had it not been for the anchor of the [[WP:GM|Greater Manchester]] project. -- +++$+++ Our discussion over the past few days has allowed me to clarify my thoughts about wikipedia, and hopefully will help you to see a positive and personally fulfilling way that you can continue to contribute as well. WikiDragons and WikiHermits both need caves to live in, and that's what I've found WikiProjects to be. You can make a far greater difference at GA than you ever could at FAC, which really has become an outstanding example of the law of diminishing returns. Subject specfic projects can help a great deal as well. I'd have left wikipedia in disgust ages ago had it not been for the anchor of the [[WP:GM|Greater Manchester]] project. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 17:02, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
268422 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268421 +++$+++ 268421 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.219108560E09 +++$+++ I don't know if I am the project type. I looked at what seemed to be lists of projects; perhaps the geology, or law, or architecture projects. But in writing article, I really like to wander freely. My last projects, to which I am still attached, Cuba and the Caribbean, have now become political minefields. A geographical place, like you have, would be wonderful but I don't have one. I will look into this more.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I don't know if I am the project type. I looked at what seemed to be lists of projects; perhaps the geology, or law, or architecture projects. But in writing article, I really like to wander freely. My last projects, to which I am still attached, Cuba and the Caribbean, have now become political minefields. A geographical place, like you have, would be wonderful but I don't have one. I will look into this more.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:16, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

530566 +++$+++ Ziyalistix +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-16 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.250432700E09 +++$+++ Hello, in the article that you wrote about [[Pete DePaolo]], it says he was born in Roseland, New Jersey, but I found sources on the internet saying he was born in Philadelphia, among [http:\/\/www.indy500.com\/images\/stats\/pdfs\/birthplaces.pdf INDIANAPOLIS 500 WINNERS \u2013 BIRTHPLACES at indy.com] and [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=fd-trcbDBhoC&pg=PA83&dq=Pete+DePaolo+Philadelphia#v=onepage&q=Pete%20DePaolo%20Philadelphia&f=false A century of Philadelphia sports at Google Books], do you have sources that say the opposite ? Kind regards -- +++$+++ Hello, in the article that you wrote about [[Pete DePaolo]], it says he was born in Roseland, New Jersey, but I found sources on the internet saying he was born in Philadelphia, among [http://www.indy500.com/images/stats/pdfs/birthplaces.pdf INDIANAPOLIS 500 WINNERS – BIRTHPLACES at indy.com] and [http://books.google.com/books?id=fd-trcbDBhoC&pg=PA83&dq=Pete+DePaolo+Philadelphia#v=onepage&q=Pete%20DePaolo%20Philadelphia&f=false A century of Philadelphia sports at Google Books], do you have sources that say the opposite ? Kind regards --[[User:Ziyalistix|Ziyalistix]] ([[User talk:Ziyalistix|talk]]) 07:25, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
530567 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530566 +++$+++ 530566 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.250448060E09 +++$+++ The source for Roseland is [http:\/\/www.hickoksports.com\/biograph\/depaolop.shtml this one], which over the years has not proven to be very reliable. So I changed his birthplace per your sources. Thanks for bringing this up! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :The source for Roseland is [http://www.hickoksports.com/biograph/depaolop.shtml this one], which over the years has not proven to be very reliable. So I changed his birthplace per your sources. Thanks for bringing this up! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 11:41, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

268423 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268423 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-18 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.219107900E09 +++$+++ O.K. I looked at the list. [[Kind of Blue]] is a possibility (probably the easiest); [[United States v. LaRouche]] is a possibility, as I write a lot of legal articles, but the title is all wrong and would have to be changed; [[Islamic contributions to Medieval Europe]] is a possibility (but seems like it needs reorganization); [[Lake Toba]]; any of the hurricane articles. I want the result to be something calm and pleasant. What do you think?  &mdash; +++$+++ O.K. I looked at the list. [[Kind of Blue]] is a possibility (probably the easiest); [[United States v. LaRouche]] is a possibility, as I write a lot of legal articles, but the title is all wrong and would have to be changed; [[Islamic contributions to Medieval Europe]] is a possibility (but seems like it needs reorganization); [[Lake Toba]]; any of the hurricane articles. I want the result to be something calm and pleasant. What do you think?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
268424 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268423 +++$+++ 268423 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.219111860E09 +++$+++ It's usually best to avoid any subject you know ''too'' much about, for two reasons. The first is that you won't be reading it like someone who's come to learn about the article, and the second is that you'll have your own opinions on the subject that you may be tempted to impose on the article. Paradoxically though, it should also be something that you have at least an educated interest in. Some types of articles have developed a well-defined structure, so it's pretty easy to review them against their own criteria as well as GA's. Hurricane articles fall into that category, so any of them ought to be pretty straightforward. I think you're right in your assessment of the [[Islamic contributions to Medieval Europe]] article. It's good stuff, but it still needs quite a bit of work. If I was choosing, I'd probably go for [[Lake Toba]], as its eruption is a very important historical event that deserves a good article. Once again though I think there's maybe quite a bit still needing to be done there, so maybe best avoided for a first review. That leaves [[Kind of Blue]]. Like with hurricane articles, the format of that kind of article is pretty well-defined, so if it's something your interested in, then go for it. Looking only at the calm and pleasant scale, I'd probably plump for a hurricane article. -- +++$+++ :It's usually best to avoid any subject you know ''too'' much about, for two reasons. The first is that you won't be reading it like someone who's come to learn about the article, and the second is that you'll have your own opinions on the subject that you may be tempted to impose on the article. Paradoxically though, it should also be something that you have at least an educated interest in. Some types of articles have developed a well-defined structure, so it's pretty easy to review them against their own criteria as well as GA's. Hurricane articles fall into that category, so any of them ought to be pretty straightforward. I think you're right in your assessment of the [[Islamic contributions to Medieval Europe]] article. It's good stuff, but it still needs quite a bit of work. If I was choosing, I'd probably go for [[Lake Toba]], as its eruption is a very important historical event that deserves a good article. Once again though I think there's maybe quite a bit still needing to be done there, so maybe best avoided for a first review. That leaves [[Kind of Blue]]. Like with hurricane articles, the format of that kind of article is pretty well-defined, so if it's something your interested in, then go for it. Looking only at the calm and pleasant scale, I'd probably plump for a hurricane article. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 19:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
268425 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268423 +++$+++ 268424 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.219112220E09 +++$+++ Maybe I'll do [[Hurricane Dean]]. I will see if I can follow the instructions to place it on review. (I am a dunce when it comes to following wikipeda directions about anything). Then I just write my comments about the article, following the criteria? I have been looking at what people write and it seems to vary enormously.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Maybe I'll do [[Hurricane Dean]]. I will see if I can follow the instructions to place it on review. (I am a dunce when it comes to following wikipeda directions about anything). Then I just write my comments about the article, following the criteria? I have been looking at what people write and it seems to vary enormously.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
268426 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268423 +++$+++ 268425 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.219112580E09 +++$+++ Choose your own style. I just write a bulleted list of issues I think need addressing, I'm not fond of the \"official\" templates some reviewers use. Good luck with [[Hurricane Dean]], although I'm sure you won't need it, having been through the FAC fires. I'll be watching anyway, so what can go wrong? -- +++$+++ :::Choose your own style. I just write a bulleted list of issues I think need addressing, I'm not fond of the "official" templates some reviewers use. Good luck with [[Hurricane Dean]], although I'm sure you won't need it, having been through the FAC fires. I'll be watching anyway, so what can go wrong? --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 19:23, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
268427 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268423 +++$+++ 268426 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.219122180E09 +++$+++ There does not seem to be much wrong with [[Hurricane Dean]]. I noted a few things and I might say something about some of the idiosyncratic wording at times, but really it is ready for FAC as far as I can tell. What happens now? (I left Plasticup a note on his page.)  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::There does not seem to be much wrong with [[Hurricane Dean]]. I noted a few things and I might say something about some of the idiosyncratic wording at times, but really it is ready for FAC as far as I can tell. What happens now? (I left Plasticup a note on his page.)  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:03, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
268428 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268423 +++$+++ 268427 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.219122780E09 +++$+++ Nice review, I told you the hurricane ones were generally easy. What happens now is that you put the article on hold, waiting for the the issues you raised to be fixed or refuted. How to do that's on the [[WP:GAN]] page. If you're stuck, give me a shout. -- +++$+++ :::::Nice review, I told you the hurricane ones were generally easy. What happens now is that you put the article on hold, waiting for the the issues you raised to be fixed or refuted. How to do that's on the [[WP:GAN]] page. If you're stuck, give me a shout. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 22:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
268429 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268423 +++$+++ 268428 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.219125660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for doing the copy editing. (The comma you stuck in I hesitated over and then decided to leave it out!) &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::Thanks for doing the copy editing. (The comma you stuck in I hesitated over and then decided to leave it out!) &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
268430 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268423 +++$+++ 268429 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.219128000E09 +++$+++ My English teacher used to say \"If in doubt then leave it out\". What I say is, be [[WP:BOLD|bold]], and bugger the consequences. :-) The only thing you've forgotten to do is to transclude your review into the article's talk page, which I've just done. -- +++$+++ :::::::My English teacher used to say "If in doubt then leave it out". What I say is, be [[WP:BOLD|bold]], and bugger the consequences. :-) The only thing you've forgotten to do is to transclude your review into the article's talk page, which I've just done. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 23:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
268431 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268423 +++$+++ 268430 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.219128420E09 +++$+++ Thank you for that! Transclude is a mysterious word to me. Onward to another article.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::Thank you for that! Transclude is a mysterious word to me. Onward to another article.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:47, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
268432 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268423 +++$+++ 268431 +++$+++ 2008-08-19 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.219129440E09 +++$+++ It was a mystery to me for a long time as well. But all it means in this case is adding <nowiki>{{Talk:Hurricane Dean\/GA1}}<\/nowiki> to the end of the article's talk page. -- +++$+++ :::::::::It was a mystery to me for a long time as well. But all it means in this case is adding <nowiki>{{Talk:Hurricane Dean/GA1}}</nowiki> to the end of the article's talk page. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 00:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
268433 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268423 +++$+++ 268431 +++$+++ 2008-08-19 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.219140120E09 +++$+++ PS. You should also update the article's GA template to show that it's on hold, as I've done [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AHurricane_Dean&diff=232823116&oldid=232792213 here]. I can't believe that I ever tried to persuade you that the process was easy. ;-) -- +++$+++ :::::::::PS. You should also update the article's GA template to show that it's on hold, as I've done [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AHurricane_Dean&diff=232823116&oldid=232792213 here]. I can't believe that I ever tried to persuade you that the process was easy. ;-) --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 03:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

530569 +++$+++ Freekee +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530569 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-16 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.250470860E09 +++$+++ Hey, I just uploaded a couple of pictures I thought you might want to see. [[:File:Milwaukee-Mile Aug2009 grandstand.jpg]] and [[:File:Milwaukee-Mile Aug2009 wall.jpg]]. Not sure if they're useful for articles at this time, but take a look. - +++$+++ Hey, I just uploaded a couple of pictures I thought you might want to see. [[:File:Milwaukee-Mile Aug2009 grandstand.jpg]] and [[:File:Milwaukee-Mile Aug2009 wall.jpg]]. Not sure if they're useful for articles at this time, but take a look. -[[User:Freekee|Freekee]] ([[User talk:Freekee|talk]]) 18:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
530570 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530569 +++$+++ 530569 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.250484360E09 +++$+++ I looked a long time to get a decent picture of the [[SAFER barrier]], and you uploaded one even cleaer! I added that image to the article. I went to the track in June and got TONS of pictures from everywhere as I had a pit pass. Check out [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Category:2009_NorthernTool.com_250 this Commons category], and I'm not done uploading yet! I have pictures of every car. Thanks for giving me the heads up and for taking these photos! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I looked a long time to get a decent picture of the [[SAFER barrier]], and you uploaded one even cleaer! I added that image to the article. I went to the track in June and got TONS of pictures from everywhere as I had a pit pass. Check out [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:2009_NorthernTool.com_250 this Commons category], and I'm not done uploading yet! I have pictures of every car. Thanks for giving me the heads up and for taking these photos! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 21:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
530571 +++$+++ Freekee +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530569 +++$+++ 530569 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.250511660E09 +++$+++ Ah, the SAFER Barrier. You'd asked me, quite some time ago, to get a shot, but I couldn't remember exactly what you wanted, or for which article. :-) I actually drove on the track. I couldn't go very fast, though, since it was a parking lot - literally. - +++$+++ :Ah, the SAFER Barrier. You'd asked me, quite some time ago, to get a shot, but I couldn't remember exactly what you wanted, or for which article. :-) I actually drove on the track. I couldn't go very fast, though, since it was a parking lot - literally. -[[User:Freekee|Freekee]] ([[User talk:Freekee|talk]]) 05:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

530572 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530572 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-17 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.250493780E09 +++$+++ I'll prolly get to Lernerville and maybe [[Motordrome speedway]] yet this year.  I'd like to find a way to tie in a [[Nashville Superspeedway]] or [[Music City Motorplex]] with a wiki-meetup there in early Sept., but it's not looking promising at the moment.  Would still like to catch one or two of the year end events up your way as well, but we'll see how it goes.  Well, kind of a \"Myspacey\" post I know, hopefully the \"get-a-blog police\" won't be looking for me ... lol.  :-) Take care \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ I'll prolly get to Lernerville and maybe [[Motordrome speedway]] yet this year.  I'd like to find a way to tie in a [[Nashville Superspeedway]] or [[Music City Motorplex]] with a wiki-meetup there in early Sept., but it's not looking promising at the moment.  Would still like to catch one or two of the year end events up your way as well, but we'll see how it goes.  Well, kind of a "Myspacey" post I know, hopefully the "get-a-blog police" won't be looking for me ... lol.  :-) Take care — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 00:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
530573 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530572 +++$+++ 530572 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.250496120E09 +++$+++ I didn't watch the NASCAR race, I miss most of them. I do love the road courses and I actually was with the NASCAR fan part of my family to watch the Watkins Glen race but it got rain delayed of course. I did hear a post-race interview, and Johnson said they are better off not playing the fuel gamble game because it doesn't work for them. I hope you can make it to the Music City Motorplex. I did a lot of work on that article and it always was a great place to watch a Busch Series race. In downtown Nashville, the Capitol building, and the [[Ryman Auditorium]] are AWESOME must-see places. No one watches my talk page, I'm not very interesting :P (tee hee!). I'm sure you'll get LOTS of pictures from the Music City Motorplex, so this is a productive response. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I didn't watch the NASCAR race, I miss most of them. I do love the road courses and I actually was with the NASCAR fan part of my family to watch the Watkins Glen race but it got rain delayed of course. I did hear a post-race interview, and Johnson said they are better off not playing the fuel gamble game because it doesn't work for them. I hope you can make it to the Music City Motorplex. I did a lot of work on that article and it always was a great place to watch a Busch Series race. In downtown Nashville, the Capitol building, and the [[Ryman Auditorium]] are AWESOME must-see places. No one watches my talk page, I'm not very interesting :P (tee hee!). I'm sure you'll get LOTS of pictures from the Music City Motorplex, so this is a productive response. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
530574 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530572 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.250497440E09 +++$+++ It was sarcasm, of course. I know that there are at least a half dozen people watching my talk page. I don't understand why you'd be jealous since my page isn't nearly as active as your page is. I suppose there's always something for all of us to learn from each other. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::It was sarcasm, of course. I know that there are at least a half dozen people watching my talk page. I don't understand why you'd be jealous since my page isn't nearly as active as your page is. I suppose there's always something for all of us to learn from each other. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:24, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

6288 +++$+++ Coroboy +++$+++ Sladen +++$+++ 6288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312530960E09 +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions\/Sladen|your contributions]] to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to [[:Serbian Cyrillic alphabet]], it is recommended that you use the [[Help:Show preview|preview]] button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces [[Wikipedia:edit conflict|edit conflict]]s, and prevents clogging up [[Special:Recentchanges|recent changes]] and the [[Wikipedia:page history|page history]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-preview --> \u2014 +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Sladen|your contributions]] to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to [[:Serbian Cyrillic alphabet]], it is recommended that you use the [[Help:Show preview|preview]] button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces [[Wikipedia:edit conflict|edit conflict]]s, and prevents clogging up [[Special:Recentchanges|recent changes]] and the [[Wikipedia:page history|page history]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-preview --> —[[User:Coroboy|Coroboy]] ([[User talk:Coroboy|talk]]) 00:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
6289 +++$+++ Sladen +++$+++ Sladen +++$+++ 6288 +++$+++ 6288 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.312570380E09 +++$+++ Appreciations, Thank you for the helpful reminder.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Appreciations, Thank you for the helpful reminder.  —[[User:Sladen|Sladen]] ([[User talk:Sladen#top|talk]]) 11:53, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

263192 +++$+++ Arwel Parry +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-01-09 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.105263600E09 +++$+++ Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. I notice you're a bit of an ITV fan! One thing to note is that we had a big argument about date formats in Wikipedia a couple of years ago, with the result being documented in [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)]] -- the outcome is that for American subjects you use month-day-year format, for British and European subjects you use day-month-year, and for others you use whatever format the original author used, as long as the format is consistent throughout the article. In any case, as long as all dates are wikilinked the format doesn't matter, as which format the reader sees is defined for each user in their [[Special:Preferences|preferences]] page! --  +++$+++ Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. I notice you're a bit of an ITV fan! One thing to note is that we had a big argument about date formats in Wikipedia a couple of years ago, with the result being documented in [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)]] -- the outcome is that for American subjects you use month-day-year format, for British and European subjects you use day-month-year, and for others you use whatever format the original author used, as long as the format is consistent throughout the article. In any case, as long as all dates are wikilinked the format doesn't matter, as which format the reader sees is defined for each user in their [[Special:Preferences|preferences]] page! -- [[User:Arwel Parry|Arwel]] 01:40, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
263193 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263192 +++$+++ 263192 +++$+++ 2005-02-06 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.107730140E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 14:49, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
263194 +++$+++ EliasAlucard +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263192 +++$+++ 263193 +++$+++ 2005-02-06 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.107734340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:EliasAlucard|EliasAlucard]] 15:59, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
263195 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263192 +++$+++ 263194 +++$+++ 2005-02-06 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.107732180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::: [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 15:23, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
263196 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263192 +++$+++ 263194 +++$+++ 2005-02-06 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.107739080E09 +++$+++ '''Update''' Just found this: [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#\"See also\"]]   +++$+++ ::: '''Update''' Just found this: [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#"See also"]]  [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 17:18, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

6291 +++$+++ ClemRutter +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-04 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.307245560E09 +++$+++ Maybe you have suggestions.-- +++$+++ Maybe you have suggestions.--[[User:ClemRutter|ClemRutter]] ([[User talk:ClemRutter|talk]]) 20:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
6292 +++$+++ Andrew Dalby +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6291 +++$+++ 6291 +++$+++ 2011-06-08 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.307564700E09 +++$+++ Expert is putting it too strong! All I've done is added some bibliography to the articles; but most of that stuff isn't on line and I don't have access to it. I agree with Clem: suggestions welcome. <font face=\"Gill Sans\"><font color=\"green\">[[User:Andrew Dalby|And]]<\/font>'''[[User Talk:Andrew Dalby|rew D]]'''<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :Expert is putting it too strong! All I've done is added some bibliography to the articles; but most of that stuff isn't on line and I don't have access to it. I agree with Clem: suggestions welcome. <font face="Gill Sans"><font color="green">[[User:Andrew Dalby|And]]</font>'''[[User Talk:Andrew Dalby|rew D]]'''<font color="green">[[User:Andrew Dalby/Bibliography|alby]]</font></font> 13:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

6294 +++$+++  +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-15 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.308203580E09 +++$+++ I am a bit surprised that it is not possible to e-mail you. OK, most of the Wikipedia-related e-mails that I receive should have been dealt with via my talk page. But there are a few matters too sensitive for that route and I have one currently which I would like to send to you. &mdash; [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]]&nbsp;{{toolbar|separator=dot|[[::User talk:RHaworth|talk]] | [[::Special:Contributions\/RHaworth|contribs]] }} 22:53, 15 June 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ I am a bit surprised that it is not possible to e-mail you. OK, most of the Wikipedia-related e-mails that I receive should have been dealt with via my talk page. But there are a few matters too sensitive for that route and I have one currently which I would like to send to you. &mdash; [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]]&nbsp;{{toolbar|separator=dot|[[::User talk:RHaworth|talk]] | [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]] }} 22:53, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
6295 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6294 +++$+++ 6294 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.309048020E09 +++$+++ I've been away for a couple of weeks, just seen this.  I've never seen any need for email contact in connection with WP, so thought it best not to enable it, but have now done so in case you still want to contact me. If I find it being used irrelevantly I'll close it down again - I'll be interested to see how much it gets used.  +++$+++ :I've been away for a couple of weeks, just seen this.  I've never seen any need for email contact in connection with WP, so thought it best not to enable it, but have now done so in case you still want to contact me. If I find it being used irrelevantly I'll close it down again - I'll be interested to see how much it gets used. [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD#top|talk]]) 17:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

525337 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-25 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.180145520E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much &mdash; I like it much better!  I do have one concern, though, and I may be forced to revert back to the old one if I can't address this.  The Tourette series of articles get vandalized like crazy; is it possible to make the v-d-e line go away on the collapsible template on this application, so I don't have to worry about people hitting edit there and inserting vandalism?  I have enough vandalism to watch already, and this gives vandals direct access to the template on numerous articles ... if I can get rid of the v-d-e, I'd like to keep the template; otherwise, I'll go back to uncollapsible.  Thanks again,  +++$+++ Thanks so much &mdash; I like it much better!  I do have one concern, though, and I may be forced to revert back to the old one if I can't address this.  The Tourette series of articles get vandalized like crazy; is it possible to make the v-d-e line go away on the collapsible template on this application, so I don't have to worry about people hitting edit there and inserting vandalism?  I have enough vandalism to watch already, and this gives vandals direct access to the template on numerous articles ... if I can get rid of the v-d-e, I'd like to keep the template; otherwise, I'll go back to uncollapsible.  Thanks again, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:12, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
525338 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525337 +++$+++ 525337 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.180161120E09 +++$+++ Sorry -- there are lots of parameters (see [[Template:Navbox_generic#Parameters]]), but I don't see any way to get rid of the v-d-e. However, if you decide to stick with Navbox generic for [[Template:Topics related to Tourette syndrome]], and it gets vandalized a couple times, I'd be happy to help out with a semi-protect. -- +++$+++ :Sorry -- there are lots of parameters (see [[Template:Navbox_generic#Parameters]]), but I don't see any way to get rid of the v-d-e. However, if you decide to stick with Navbox generic for [[Template:Topics related to Tourette syndrome]], and it gets vandalized a couple times, I'd be happy to help out with a semi-protect. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:32, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
525339 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525337 +++$+++ 525338 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.180162980E09 +++$+++ ah, thanks &mdash; good solution.  I'll see how it goes, and let you know if there are problems.  Thanks again &mdash; I like it. (I wonder if vandalism on all the TS articles will start up again in June when US schools are out.)   +++$+++ ::ah, thanks &mdash; good solution.  I'll see how it goes, and let you know if there are problems.  Thanks again &mdash; I like it. (I wonder if vandalism on all the TS articles will start up again in June when US schools are out.)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:03, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

530584 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530584 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-22 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.250983860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for assessing the subject article. I'm usually not terribly concerned with article assessments, but they can be a useful form of feedback, and it's a relief to know that your evaluation is in line with my own. -- +++$+++ Thanks for assessing the subject article. I'm usually not terribly concerned with article assessments, but they can be a useful form of feedback, and it's a relief to know that your evaluation is in line with my own. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 16:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
530585 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530584 +++$+++ 530584 +++$+++ 2009-08-22 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.250989500E09 +++$+++ Yea, it is. RFD usually skips assessing article. He sure is an AWESOME Wikipedian! I learned soooo much from him when I was new here. I have a tremendous amount of respect for him. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Yea, it is. RFD usually skips assessing article. He sure is an AWESOME Wikipedian! I learned soooo much from him when I was new here. I have a tremendous amount of respect for him. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 18:05, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

268442 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-22 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.219473960E09 +++$+++ You haven't been reverted in [[Kind of Blue]] and [[Let's Get It On]], it's just that there are two ways of inserting ndashes. the first is the use the html code, as you did, but some people prefer to choose the dash from the ndash symbol itself, which is the first of the dashes you see under the '''Do not copy text from other websites ...''' warning underneath the edit box. The effect is the same identical in either case, just a matter of personal preference. -- +++$+++ You haven't been reverted in [[Kind of Blue]] and [[Let's Get It On]], it's just that there are two ways of inserting ndashes. the first is the use the html code, as you did, but some people prefer to choose the dash from the ndash symbol itself, which is the first of the dashes you see under the '''Do not copy text from other websites ...''' warning underneath the edit box. The effect is the same identical in either case, just a matter of personal preference. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 23:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
268443 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268442 +++$+++ 268442 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.219474620E09 +++$+++ Well, I won't waste time anymore on endashes.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Well, I won't waste time anymore on endashes.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
268444 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268442 +++$+++ 268443 +++$+++ 2008-08-23 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.219475280E09 +++$+++ If you hadn't put the endashes in, then he wouldn't have been able to run his script converting the html entity to the ndash symbol \"\u2013\", which is all that's happened. Some prefer it that way because it's fewer characters, but it amounts to the same thing whichever way it's done. -- +++$+++ ::If you hadn't put the endashes in, then he wouldn't have been able to run his script converting the html entity to the ndash symbol "–", which is all that's happened. Some prefer it that way because it's fewer characters, but it amounts to the same thing whichever way it's done. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 00:08, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
268445 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268442 +++$+++ 268444 +++$+++ 2008-08-23 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.219476000E09 +++$+++ It shows that an editor is the lowest of the low. My opinion counts for nothing and he can revert me.  The bot and script masters run the place! I won't spend time on endashes any more.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::It shows that an editor is the lowest of the low. My opinion counts for nothing and he can revert me.  The bot and script masters run the place! I won't spend time on endashes any more.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
268446 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268442 +++$+++ 268445 +++$+++ 2008-08-23 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.219476420E09 +++$+++ You ''haven't'' been reverted. The editor's has just opted to convert the ndashes to a slightly different format, that's all. It's exactly the same thing as the difference between <code>&amp;amp;<\/code> and &, i.e., no difference at all. -- +++$+++ ::::You ''haven't'' been reverted. The editor's has just opted to convert the ndashes to a slightly different format, that's all. It's exactly the same thing as the difference between <code>&amp;amp;</code> and &, i.e., no difference at all. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 00:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
268447 +++$+++ Christopher Parham +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268442 +++$+++ 268442 +++$+++ 2008-08-23 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.219531260E09 +++$+++ Please calm down on this issue, T-rex is not making further edits along those lines at the moment so there is no hurry. Some time away from the dispute may be useful. I have explained to T-rex that it is not acceptable for him to continually revert to his preferred version over an optional style issue. I believe that your version, as the stable one, is favored by the MOS in a dispute but I think a better resolution would be achieved if you let other users come in rather than becoming the \"other party\" in an edit war.  +++$+++ :Please calm down on this issue, T-rex is not making further edits along those lines at the moment so there is no hurry. Some time away from the dispute may be useful. I have explained to T-rex that it is not acceptable for him to continually revert to his preferred version over an optional style issue. I believe that your version, as the stable one, is favored by the MOS in a dispute but I think a better resolution would be achieved if you let other users come in rather than becoming the "other party" in an edit war. [[User:Christopher Parham|Christopher Parham]] [[User talk:Christopher Parham|(talk)]] 15:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
268448 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268442 +++$+++ 268447 +++$+++ 2008-08-23 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.219531560E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I hope you help me out on this. I have worked hard on endashes in several articles he has changed with his mass script with no discussion on the talk page. When I look in the edit window, I cannot tell which hyphens need changing and which are in his format. So I will not do any more endashes until this is settled.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Thank you. I hope you help me out on this. I have worked hard on endashes in several articles he has changed with his mass script with no discussion on the talk page. When I look in the edit window, I cannot tell which hyphens need changing and which are in his format. So I will not do any more endashes until this is settled.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

6304 +++$+++ Connormlh +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.311322560E09 +++$+++ Hey sorry for deleting that thing earlier; I really did appreciate it, and it was an accidental deletion. I'll replace it as soon as possible, probably on Monday, because with device I have right now, I currently have no Copy + Paste capabilities. Thanks!  +++$+++ Hey sorry for deleting that thing earlier; I really did appreciate it, and it was an accidental deletion. I'll replace it as soon as possible, probably on Monday, because with device I have right now, I currently have no Copy + Paste capabilities. Thanks! [[User:Connormlh|Connormlh]] ([[User talk:Connormlh|talk]]) 01:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
6305 +++$+++ Connormlh +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6304 +++$+++ 6304 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.311645240E09 +++$+++ Hey, sorry again to bother, but would you still like me to replace it? I'm still not sure, because you didn't respond. Let me know and I'll do it ASAP. Thanks!  +++$+++ :Hey, sorry again to bother, but would you still like me to replace it? I'm still not sure, because you didn't respond. Let me know and I'll do it ASAP. Thanks! [[User:Connormlh|Connormlh]] ([[User talk:Connormlh|talk]]) 18:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
6306 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6304 +++$+++ 6305 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.311652440E09 +++$+++ I didn't reply because I don't know what \"thing\" you're talking about here, so assumed that you'd accidentally left a message here intended for someone else! Could you clarify? thanks.  +++$+++ ::I didn't reply because I don't know what "thing" you're talking about here, so assumed that you'd accidentally left a message here intended for someone else! Could you clarify? thanks. [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD#top|talk]]) 20:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

612720 +++$+++ Malc82 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-16 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.179378840E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just removed your last contributions to the ID talk page. While I pretty much share your position, they really violated WP\u2019s etiquette and are an open invitation for a heated debate. I just posted my comments on [[User_talk:DavidPesta]] would ask you to do the same if you need to. Otherwise we\u2019ll soon have one of these talk pages where 90% of the contribs are fights between varying POV\u2019s.  +++$+++ Hi, I just removed your last contributions to the ID talk page. While I pretty much share your position, they really violated WP’s etiquette and are an open invitation for a heated debate. I just posted my comments on [[User_talk:DavidPesta]] would ask you to do the same if you need to. Otherwise we’ll soon have one of these talk pages where 90% of the contribs are fights between varying POV’s. [[User:Malc82|Malc82]] 22:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
612721 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612720 +++$+++ 612720 +++$+++ 2007-05-16 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.179378960E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. Thanks, ..  +++$+++ :Fair enough. Thanks, .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
612722 +++$+++ Malc82 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612720 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-16 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.179379080E09 +++$+++ Your comments have already been restored, I would still ask you to remove them yourself. +++$+++ :::Your comments have already been restored, I would still ask you to remove them yourself.[[User:Malc82|Malc82]] 22:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
612723 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612720 +++$+++ 612721 +++$+++ 2007-05-16 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.179380940E09 +++$+++ Tried to, but was beaten to it by an edit conflict so have tried to soothe things a bit. Ah, all those wicked naturalists \u2013 or is it naturists? .. :-\/ ...  +++$+++ ::Tried to, but was beaten to it by an edit conflict so have tried to soothe things a bit. Ah, all those wicked naturalists – or is it naturists? .. :-/ ... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

268450 +++$+++ Peanut4 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-24 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.219628760E09 +++$+++ Just a quick note following your comments at [[WP:GAC]], reviews are generally kept on hold for at least a week. I would give the initial nominator a little more time to address your queries.  +++$+++ Just a quick note following your comments at [[WP:GAC]], reviews are generally kept on hold for at least a week. I would give the initial nominator a little more time to address your queries. [[User:Peanut4|Peanut4]] ([[User talk:Peanut4|talk]]) 18:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
268451 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268450 +++$+++ 268450 +++$+++ 2008-08-24 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.219628880E09 +++$+++ Yes, I intend to leave it on hold. I was responding to a comment left under my \"hold\" that has since been removed.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes, I intend to leave it on hold. I was responding to a comment left under my "hold" that has since been removed.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

6307 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6307 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.311396900E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I'd be happy to sort all this out, but I thought I'd run it past you first.  I'll get on to Keith if I'm prevented moving some articles.  Do you have any thoughts on the above (especially the \"not sures\")?  NB I also noticed that the NSEW location maps appear on some articles but not all.  I altered a few that were inaccurate or linked to dab pages.  And there are some strange articles not mentioned above:  [[Blenheim, Leeds]] and [[Moorside, Leeds]] spring to mind.... --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ Anyway, I'd be happy to sort all this out, but I thought I'd run it past you first.  I'll get on to Keith if I'm prevented moving some articles.  Do you have any thoughts on the above (especially the "not sures")?  NB I also noticed that the NSEW location maps appear on some articles but not all.  I altered a few that were inaccurate or linked to dab pages.  And there are some strange articles not mentioned above:  [[Blenheim, Leeds]] and [[Moorside, Leeds]] spring to mind.... --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 21:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
6308 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6307 +++$+++ 6307 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311401160E09 +++$+++ Good luck with it all!  +++$+++ :Good luck with it all! [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD#top|talk]]) 23:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
6309 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6307 +++$+++ 6308 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311553740E09 +++$+++ Comments welcome. --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ ::Comments welcome. --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 17:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
6310 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6307 +++$+++ 6309 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311554940E09 +++$+++ Looks good so far. I'd notice TN disappearing from the list - probably right. (I seem to remember that the article was about the area rather than the house\/park, back in the mirks of time.)  OK, I'll have a go at adding the 12 to the list (will have to remind myself how it worked, but cut and paste will get it sorted). Not sure about your 2 dubious ones - if in doubt, might as well add. (cf Airebrough!) Not right now - tea nearly ready. (Mother prefers to eat around 6pm, but we're late tonight!).  +++$+++ :::Looks good so far. I'd notice TN disappearing from the list - probably right. (I seem to remember that the article was about the area rather than the house/park, back in the mirks of time.)  OK, I'll have a go at adding the 12 to the list (will have to remind myself how it worked, but cut and paste will get it sorted). Not sure about your 2 dubious ones - if in doubt, might as well add. (cf Airebrough!) Not right now - tea nearly ready. (Mother prefers to eat around 6pm, but we're late tonight!). [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD#top|talk]]) 17:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
6311 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6307 +++$+++ 6310 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311569760E09 +++$+++ Oof, I'd forgotten how much work it was to add some places (verging on [[WP:OR]] I suppose by the time I've used the council site to get from a postcode to a ward name etc where the article is lacking an infobox or other useful stuff). Not at all sure about Knowsthorpe\/Knostropp: it definitely exists\/existed, and is on OS map, but not sure exactly where! Some discussion at http:\/\/www.secretleeds.com\/forum\/Messages.aspx?ThreadID=236 .  I've added the 12 + 2 places to the list, but only put in full details for the first five and then ran out of energy. Feel free to continue the work! Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::Oof, I'd forgotten how much work it was to add some places (verging on [[WP:OR]] I suppose by the time I've used the council site to get from a postcode to a ward name etc where the article is lacking an infobox or other useful stuff). Not at all sure about Knowsthorpe/Knostropp: it definitely exists/existed, and is on OS map, but not sure exactly where! Some discussion at http://www.secretleeds.com/forum/Messages.aspx?ThreadID=236 .  I've added the 12 + 2 places to the list, but only put in full details for the first five and then ran out of energy. Feel free to continue the work! Cheers, [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD#top|talk]]) 21:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
6312 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6307 +++$+++ 6311 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.311920100E09 +++$+++ Did a bit more on it today, then got distracted from [[Stourton, Leeds]] onto improving that article and then creating [[Yorkshire Imperial Band]].  Hmm, that's wikipedia!  +++$+++ :::::Did a bit more on it today, then got distracted from [[Stourton, Leeds]] onto improving that article and then creating [[Yorkshire Imperial Band]].  Hmm, that's wikipedia! [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD#top|talk]]) 23:15, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
6313 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6307 +++$+++ 6312 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311923280E09 +++$+++ You may have noticed that I first PRODded and then dePRODded [[Jaw Hill]], having found a RS for the archaeology stuff.  I've been trying to work out whether it's actually in the City of Leeds and drawing a blank - can't work out where the boundary is on my 2 1\/2 inch (or metric equivalent) map.  It's awfully close to [[Kirkhamgate]] (Wakefield) but not far from the Ardsleys (Leeds) and not that far away from Batley (Kirklees).  Oh well!  The other thing is that it isn't exactly a place, it's a hill, so I'm wondering whether, if it is in Leeds, it ought to be in this Cat.  (I looked at what needs doing to try to fill in the gaps in the table, but my head started to hurt!) --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ ::::::You may have noticed that I first PRODded and then dePRODded [[Jaw Hill]], having found a RS for the archaeology stuff.  I've been trying to work out whether it's actually in the City of Leeds and drawing a blank - can't work out where the boundary is on my 2 1/2 inch (or metric equivalent) map.  It's awfully close to [[Kirkhamgate]] (Wakefield) but not far from the Ardsleys (Leeds) and not that far away from Batley (Kirklees).  Oh well!  The other thing is that it isn't exactly a place, it's a hill, so I'm wondering whether, if it is in Leeds, it ought to be in this Cat.  (I looked at what needs doing to try to fill in the gaps in the table, but my head started to hurt!) --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 00:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

268452 +++$+++ Plasticup +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-25 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.219713840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your GA review - it was much quicker than I expected! Looks like the backlog at GAN is almost gone.  +++$+++ Thanks for your GA review - it was much quicker than I expected! Looks like the backlog at GAN is almost gone. [[User:Plasticup|<b><font color="#0080FF">Plasticup</font></b>]] [[User_Talk:Plasticup |<font color="#2A8E82"><sup><small>T</small></sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Plasticup|<font color="#2A8E82"><small>C</small></font>]] 18:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
268453 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268452 +++$+++ 268452 +++$+++ 2008-08-25 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.219714560E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. It was a good article.  &mdash; +++$+++ :You are welcome. It was a good article.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

530597 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-26 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.251332160E09 +++$+++ I'm thinking of putting [[1966 Daytona 500]] up for DYK.  I'm not sure what tools you guys use to measure \"1,500\" or 5x expansion.  Do you count words, letters, doc size?  Let me know if you think it would meet the qualifications - I might do a companion piece for [[1966 in NASCAR]] down the road if it merits it. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ I'm thinking of putting [[1966 Daytona 500]] up for DYK.  I'm not sure what tools you guys use to measure "1,500" or 5x expansion.  Do you count words, letters, doc size?  Let me know if you think it would meet the qualifications - I might do a companion piece for [[1966 in NASCAR]] down the road if it merits it. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 17:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
530598 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530597 +++$+++ 530597 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.251355560E09 +++$+++ The expansion on [[1966 Daytona 500]] checks out with [[User:Shubinator\/DYKcheck|DYKcheck]].  +++$+++ :The expansion on [[1966 Daytona 500]] checks out with [[User:Shubinator/DYKcheck|DYKcheck]]. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 23:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
530599 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530597 +++$+++ 530598 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.251363480E09 +++$+++ There you go! I DYKcheck counts 3100 characters, more the double the minimum. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::There you go! I DYKcheck counts 3100 characters, more the double the minimum. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:58, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
530600 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530597 +++$+++ 530599 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.251375960E09 +++$+++ I submitted, but the \"hook\" is pretty crappy in the way it's worded - I asked a friend for some help to tweak it.  Hopefully I can tweak it in the DYK nom after his suggestion. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :::I submitted, but the "hook" is pretty crappy in the way it's worded - I asked a friend for some help to tweak it.  Hopefully I can tweak it in the DYK nom after his suggestion. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 05:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

268454 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-24 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.219597800E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, thanks for the review.  I'm going to get to it in the next 24 hours.  +++$+++ Mattisse, thanks for the review.  I'm going to get to it in the next 24 hours. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 10:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
268455 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268454 +++$+++ 268454 +++$+++ 2008-08-26 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.219754940E09 +++$+++ Slogging my way through it.  Lots of work to do.  +++$+++ :Slogging my way through it.  Lots of work to do. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 05:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
268456 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268454 +++$+++ 268455 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.219940940E09 +++$+++ I'll try and give it some more attention in the next two hours.  +++$+++ ::I'll try and give it some more attention in the next two hours. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 09:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
268457 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268454 +++$+++ 268456 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.219957620E09 +++$+++ I've made some headway, but there's still more to do.  +++$+++ :::I've made some headway, but there's still more to do. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 14:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
268458 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268454 +++$+++ 268457 +++$+++ 2008-08-30 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.220112480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your review, Mattisse.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for your review, Mattisse. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 09:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

525340 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525340 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-27 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.180333260E09 +++$+++ Hi there again, just thought I'd give you a heads-up that I've redirected [[thioctic acid]] to [[lipoic acid]], as they are the same compound. I've also merged the relevant content from thioctic acid's chembox into the lipoic acid one, and noted that \"thioctic acid\" is an alternate name. Keep up the good work :)  +++$+++ Hi there again, just thought I'd give you a heads-up that I've redirected [[thioctic acid]] to [[lipoic acid]], as they are the same compound. I've also merged the relevant content from thioctic acid's chembox into the lipoic acid one, and noted that "thioctic acid" is an alternate name. Keep up the good work :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 23:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
525341 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525340 +++$+++ 525340 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.180333380E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the error, and thanks for catching it. And thanks again for all your diagrams. -- +++$+++ :Sorry for the error, and thanks for catching it. And thanks again for all your diagrams. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 23:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
525342 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525340 +++$+++ 525341 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.180333800E09 +++$+++ No problem. I'm still impressed by the sheer quantity and scope of your contributions.  +++$+++ ::No problem. I'm still impressed by the sheer quantity and scope of your contributions. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 23:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

6314 +++$+++ Since 10.28.2010 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311909000E09 +++$+++ Hi. Please tell me why you tagged [[List of insurance topics]] as PROD. ''''' +++$+++ Hi. Please tell me why you tagged [[List of insurance topics]] as PROD. '''''[[User:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="#DAA520">An</font>]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="#DAA520">editor since 10.28.2010.</font>]]''''' 20:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
6315 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6314 +++$+++ 6314 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.311909480E09 +++$+++ Were you not looking out for any replies at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#Insurance]], where I replied to you?  And also, if you look at the page history you can see my rationale in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_insurance_topics&oldid=441830012 the version where I PRODded it] (at this point it still had its old title of \"Insurance (disambiguation)\").   +++$+++ :Were you not looking out for any replies at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#Insurance]], where I replied to you?  And also, if you look at the page history you can see my rationale in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_insurance_topics&oldid=441830012 the version where I PRODded it] (at this point it still had its old title of "Insurance (disambiguation)").  [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD#top|talk]]) 20:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
6316 +++$+++ Since 10.28.2010 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6314 +++$+++ 6315 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.311909780E09 +++$+++ No, I was not looking for replies there. I didn't know that the discussion page of [[List of insurance topics]] was at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#insurance|Wikiproject: Disambiguation]]. <del>Thanks again,<\/del> ''''' +++$+++ ::No, I was not looking for replies there. I didn't know that the discussion page of [[List of insurance topics]] was at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#insurance|Wikiproject: Disambiguation]]. <del>Thanks again,</del> '''''[[User:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="#DAA520">An</font>]] [[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|<font color="#DAA520">editor since 10.28.2010.</font>]]''''' 20:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

268459 +++$+++ LordSunday +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-27 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.219868580E09 +++$+++ Hi there, could you finish the review ASAP? I have 2 other GANs to help and an FAC that is sort of struggling. Thank you, --''' +++$+++ Hi there, could you finish the review ASAP? I have 2 other GANs to help and an FAC that is sort of struggling. Thank you, --'''[[User:LordSunday|<font face="verdana"><font color="black">Lord</font></font>]][[Special:Contributions/LordSunday|<font face="verdana">₪</font>]][[User talk:LordSunday|<font face="verdana"><font color="green">Sunday</font></font>]]''' 13:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
268460 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268459 +++$+++ 268459 +++$+++ 2008-08-27 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.219869180E09 +++$+++ O.K.  &mdash; +++$+++ :O.K.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
268461 +++$+++ LordSunday +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268459 +++$+++ 268460 +++$+++ 2008-08-27 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.219899780E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Could you take a look at it again? I think I have satisfied your requests. --''' +++$+++ ::Thanks. Could you take a look at it again? I think I have satisfied your requests. --'''[[User:LordSunday|<font face="verdana"><font color="black">Lord</font></font>]][[Special:Contributions/LordSunday|<font face="verdana">₪</font>]][[User talk:LordSunday|<font face="verdana"><font color="green">Sunday</font></font>]]''' 22:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
268462 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268459 +++$+++ 268461 +++$+++ 2008-08-27 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.219902120E09 +++$+++ Done. Good work!  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Done. Good work!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

6317 +++$+++ Chrisrus +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6317 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311913260E09 +++$+++ Unless I'm wrong, a [[Cassandra (metaphor)]] is not a situation; it's a person.  The article may have been slightly misread or it may be misleadingly written, but if you read it closely, it says that the word is used in situations of a particular type, but it doesn't say that a Cassandra is a situation.  People call people Cassandras in certain situations.  They don't call certain situations Cassandras.  It's not all that different from the term \"[[Chicken Little]]\".  Like if I come up to you and start warning you of some impending doom, and you treat me dismissively, you might say, \"Chris, don't be such a Cassandra.\"  You wouldn't say \"Hey, this situation is a Cassandra.\"  +++$+++ Unless I'm wrong, a [[Cassandra (metaphor)]] is not a situation; it's a person.  The article may have been slightly misread or it may be misleadingly written, but if you read it closely, it says that the word is used in situations of a particular type, but it doesn't say that a Cassandra is a situation.  People call people Cassandras in certain situations.  They don't call certain situations Cassandras.  It's not all that different from the term "[[Chicken Little]]".  Like if I come up to you and start warning you of some impending doom, and you treat me dismissively, you might say, "Chris, don't be such a Cassandra."  You wouldn't say "Hey, this situation is a Cassandra." [[User:Chrisrus|Chrisrus]] ([[User talk:Chrisrus|talk]]) 21:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
6318 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ 6317 +++$+++ 6317 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311915960E09 +++$+++ I agree: to me a \"Cassandra\" is a person whose warnings are ignored, not a situation. (I don't think it would be used quite as you suggest - more likely that after your dire prophecies had happened someone would say \"Chris was the Cassandra, he suggested x might happen and we wouldn't believe him.\")  The article seems curiously opaque on this. I've tweaked the dab page and hope you agree it's an improvement. The article has a long talk page history, quite beyond my sphere of knowledge, and I hope the dab page won't upset anyone.  +++$+++ :I agree: to me a "Cassandra" is a person whose warnings are ignored, not a situation. (I don't think it would be used quite as you suggest - more likely that after your dire prophecies had happened someone would say "Chris was the Cassandra, he suggested x might happen and we wouldn't believe him.")  The article seems curiously opaque on this. I've tweaked the dab page and hope you agree it's an improvement. The article has a long talk page history, quite beyond my sphere of knowledge, and I hope the dab page won't upset anyone. [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD#top|talk]]) 22:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

268463 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-28 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.219957500E09 +++$+++ Is this article on hold?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ Is this article on hold?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 14:05, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
268464 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268463 +++$+++ 268463 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.219962180E09 +++$+++ Yes. The last time I looked at it there were still uncited passages. However, glancing through it now, it looks like they have been fixed. The original nominator said he did not have time to work on the article, but a bunch of other editors have fixed it up. Looks like it meets GA.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes. The last time I looked at it there were still uncited passages. However, glancing through it now, it looks like they have been fixed. The original nominator said he did not have time to work on the article, but a bunch of other editors have fixed it up. Looks like it meets GA.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
268465 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268463 +++$+++ 268464 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.219962480E09 +++$+++ One last problem is that in the last section, the time frame is not given. I stuck in \"As of 2008\" to the first paragraph, but all the records need to have a time frame. I considered renaming the whole section '''2008 Career milestones''' or something like that. What do you think?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::One last problem is that in the last section, the time frame is not given. I stuck in "As of 2008" to the first paragraph, but all the records need to have a time frame. I considered renaming the whole section '''2008 Career milestones''' or something like that. What do you think?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

268466 +++$+++ GaryColemanFan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268466 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-29 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.220066520E09 +++$+++ I replaced the forum reference. I also added a time frame to a couple of statements in the milestones section. I looked over the section, and it all seemed to clarify that the records are as of 2008. I'm a little bothered by the \"Records\" section, as several of the entries are unreferenced. Looking at the ones without references, though, they all seem to be listcruft that doesn't add anything to the article (Most Seasons by a non-pitcher since 1900???).  +++$+++ I replaced the forum reference. I also added a time frame to a couple of statements in the milestones section. I looked over the section, and it all seemed to clarify that the records are as of 2008. I'm a little bothered by the "Records" section, as several of the entries are unreferenced. Looking at the ones without references, though, they all seem to be listcruft that doesn't add anything to the article (Most Seasons by a non-pitcher since 1900???). [[User:GaryColemanFan|GaryColemanFan]] ([[User talk:GaryColemanFan|talk]]) 20:22, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
268467 +++$+++ GaryColemanFan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268466 +++$+++ 268466 +++$+++ 2008-08-29 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.220075640E09 +++$+++ I got rid of the non-notable entries. What else needs to be done?  +++$+++ :I got rid of the non-notable entries. What else needs to be done? [[User:GaryColemanFan|GaryColemanFan]] ([[User talk:GaryColemanFan|talk]]) 22:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

6324 +++$+++ Raul17 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-25 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.282805040E09 +++$+++ Shouldn't you wait until the physicals before posting the change?  +++$+++ Shouldn't you wait until the physicals before posting the change? [[User:Raul17|Raul17]] ([[User talk:Raul17|talk]]) 23:44, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
6325 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6324 +++$+++ 6324 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.282805280E09 +++$+++ Meh.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :Meh.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 23:48, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

6326 +++$+++ RevanFan +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-26 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.282814100E09 +++$+++ You're a pathetic excuse for a human being. Shut up, and leave me alone.  +++$+++ You're a pathetic excuse for a human being. Shut up, and leave me alone. [[User:RevanFan|RevanFan]] ([[User talk:RevanFan|talk]]) 02:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
6327 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6326 +++$+++ 6326 +++$+++ 2010-08-26 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.282818060E09 +++$+++ Then don't be an idiot.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :Then don't be an idiot.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 03:21, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

536317 +++$+++ Tsunami Butler +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536317 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-15 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.171553760E09 +++$+++ Finally, the most recent addition to the talk page is from Pascal.Tesson, who is neutral on LaRouche but says the article suffers from an extreme case of Conflict of Interest, because so much of it was written by extreme opponents of LaRouche. I agree. Check out his post [[Talk:Lyndon_LaRouche#On_conflicts_of_interest|here]], and then I suppose you should wade through the past two months of back-and-forth on the talk page. I hope that this summary of events was useful. -- +++$+++ Finally, the most recent addition to the talk page is from Pascal.Tesson, who is neutral on LaRouche but says the article suffers from an extreme case of Conflict of Interest, because so much of it was written by extreme opponents of LaRouche. I agree. Check out his post [[Talk:Lyndon_LaRouche#On_conflicts_of_interest|here]], and then I suppose you should wade through the past two months of back-and-forth on the talk page. I hope that this summary of events was useful. --[[User:Tsunami Butler|Tsunami Butler]] 07:36, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
536318 +++$+++ Tsunami Butler +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536317 +++$+++ 536317 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.171693680E09 +++$+++ The discussion is a [[Talk:Lyndon LaRouche]]. -- +++$+++ :The discussion is a [[Talk:Lyndon LaRouche]]. --[[User:Tsunami Butler|Tsunami Butler]] 22:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

612724 +++$+++ Cactus.man +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-17 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.179393180E09 +++$+++ Cheers, and see you around --<font color=\"2B7A2B\"> +++$+++ Cheers, and see you around --<font color="2B7A2B">[[User:Cactus.man|Cactus'''.'''man]]</font> <font size="4">[[User talk:Cactus.man|<span class="Unicode">&#9997;</span>]]</font> 02:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
612725 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612724 +++$+++ 612724 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.179416580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up \u2013 have added it to my watchlist \u2013 and the reminder \u2013 that's prodded me to add an article to the new articles page, also some photies to the rather neglected picture list. ..  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up – have added it to my watchlist – and the reminder – that's prodded me to add an article to the new articles page, also some photies to the rather neglected picture list. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 08:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
612726 +++$+++ Cactus.man +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612724 +++$+++ 612725 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.179420120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the shortbread, hope you kept a few for yourself. Should go well with a wee [[Bunnahabhain]] ''':''') --<font color=\"2B7A2B\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks for the shortbread, hope you kept a few for yourself. Should go well with a wee [[Bunnahabhain]] ''':''') --<font color="2B7A2B">[[User:Cactus.man|Cactus'''.'''man]]</font> <font size="4">[[User talk:Cactus.man|<span class="Unicode">&#9997;</span>]]</font> 09:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

268474 +++$+++ Blackngold29 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268474 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-29 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.220045760E09 +++$+++ I have a question about the WTON article, you failed it because it lacks \"critical reception, impact, or importance of this release\". However, as [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMalleus_Fatuorum&diff=234926094&oldid=234885868 I stated], the info isn't there because were lazy, it isn't there becuase I honestly do not think there is any. It contains the chart and sales info, so the only thing left would be reviews. But in 1999, without the internet we have today, how many magazines would review a VHS from somewhat known band, certainly not in the \"mainstream\" at that time, which contains two music videos and some interviews? There's not a lot there to review. I understand compared to most articles it is lacking, but I don't know what else we can do to it. '''<span style=\"border: 2px Black solid;background:Black;font-family: Tahoma\"> +++$+++ I have a question about the WTON article, you failed it because it lacks "critical reception, impact, or importance of this release". However, as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMalleus_Fatuorum&diff=234926094&oldid=234885868 I stated], the info isn't there because were lazy, it isn't there becuase I honestly do not think there is any. It contains the chart and sales info, so the only thing left would be reviews. But in 1999, without the internet we have today, how many magazines would review a VHS from somewhat known band, certainly not in the "mainstream" at that time, which contains two music videos and some interviews? There's not a lot there to review. I understand compared to most articles it is lacking, but I don't know what else we can do to it. '''<span style="border: 2px Black solid;background:Black;font-family: Tahoma">[[User:Blackngold29|<font color="#CDB87C">Black</font>]][[User talk:Blackngold29|<font color="#CDB87C">ngold29</font>]]</span>''' 14:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
268475 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268474 +++$+++ 268474 +++$+++ 2008-08-29 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.220046600E09 +++$+++ The article is not complete. Either the information is available because the album is notable and critical reviews and information about impact, critical reception or importance exist, or perhaps the article is as good as it can be but will never reach GA status. You are free to get a second opinion or have the article reassessed. I did solicit a second opinion before I made my decision.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum&diff=prev&oldid=234878165] &mdash; +++$+++ :The article is not complete. Either the information is available because the album is notable and critical reviews and information about impact, critical reception or importance exist, or perhaps the article is as good as it can be but will never reach GA status. You are free to get a second opinion or have the article reassessed. I did solicit a second opinion before I made my decision.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum&diff=prev&oldid=234878165] &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

263199 +++$+++ Karello +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-04-04 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.112621760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Karello|Karello]] 06:36, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
263200 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263199 +++$+++ 263199 +++$+++ 2005-04-04 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.112625900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 07:45, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

6333 +++$+++ Pats1 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-05 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.283677080E09 +++$+++ Everyone's done now...except Oakland. They \"announced\" 21 cuts, but said there was still one to come, so keep a lookout on that. Otherwise every team is at 53 except for the Seahawks\/Eagles (Andrews trade - 54\/52) and fhe Texans, who announced 24 cuts\/IR from 75, which is 51, plus Ward minus Cushing. I've moved all the suspended players over to the reserve lists and double-checked that there's no active\/X players left. Obviously, tomorrow is practice squads. We can worry about returners\/positions\/numbers next week. I'll check out Ourlads\/PFW for the waived\/injured guys we missed tomorrow, along with anything else (IS's) that we missed.  +++$+++ Everyone's done now...except Oakland. They "announced" 21 cuts, but said there was still one to come, so keep a lookout on that. Otherwise every team is at 53 except for the Seahawks/Eagles (Andrews trade - 54/52) and fhe Texans, who announced 24 cuts/IR from 75, which is 51, plus Ward minus Cushing. I've moved all the suspended players over to the reserve lists and double-checked that there's no active/X players left. Obviously, tomorrow is practice squads. We can worry about returners/positions/numbers next week. I'll check out Ourlads/PFW for the waived/injured guys we missed tomorrow, along with anything else (IS's) that we missed. [[User:Pats1|<b><font color="#0d254c">Pats</font><font color="#8f8f8f">1</font></b>]] [[User_talk:Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><sup><small>'''T'''</small></sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><small>'''C'''</small></font>]] 01:58, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
6334 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6333 +++$+++ 6333 +++$+++ 2010-09-05 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.283688660E09 +++$+++ 53 players listed as active on Raiders.com, might wanna double-check with template. Someone's on it that isn't on the site.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :53 players listed as active on Raiders.com, might wanna double-check with template. Someone's on it that isn't on the site.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 05:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

268478 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268478 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-05 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.220668020E09 +++$+++ How are you enjoying your GA reviewing? It's a bit different from FAC, I'm sure you'd agree. :-) -- +++$+++ How are you enjoying your GA reviewing? It's a bit different from FAC, I'm sure you'd agree. :-) --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 19:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
268479 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268478 +++$+++ 268478 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.220669160E09 +++$+++ I'm trying to get over a severe Wikipedia-phobia that I have developed. I have put so much into writing and editing here that seeing it for what it is has depressed me. I am forcing myself to edit to try and get over it. GA is more upbeat than FAC, less pointless nitpicking, but it does not remove the feeling that there is no meaning in this effort. I can't seem to get over a sadness and loss from the suspicion that I never will actually enjoy Wikipedia again. I thought I would at least get my DYK's to 100 to give me some feeling of accomplishment, not that many to go,  but I don't think I will last. &mdash; +++$+++ :I'm trying to get over a severe Wikipedia-phobia that I have developed. I have put so much into writing and editing here that seeing it for what it is has depressed me. I am forcing myself to edit to try and get over it. GA is more upbeat than FAC, less pointless nitpicking, but it does not remove the feeling that there is no meaning in this effort. I can't seem to get over a sadness and loss from the suspicion that I never will actually enjoy Wikipedia again. I thought I would at least get my DYK's to 100 to give me some feeling of accomplishment, not that many to go,  but I don't think I will last. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
268480 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268478 +++$+++ 268479 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.220669640E09 +++$+++ Who can tell whether there will be lasting meaning in this effort or not? We're all flying on trust in a shared vision of freely available knowledge. The daily crap that most of us have to endure seems like it comes from those looking in the gutter, not at the stars. -- +++$+++ ::Who can tell whether there will be lasting meaning in this effort or not? We're all flying on trust in a shared vision of freely available knowledge. The daily crap that most of us have to endure seems like it comes from those looking in the gutter, not at the stars. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 19:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

6336 +++$+++ RevanFan +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6336 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-07 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.283904660E09 +++$+++ How the frick do they have 10 PS players?  +++$+++ How the frick do they have 10 PS players? [[User:RevanFan|RevanFan]] ([[User talk:RevanFan|talk]]) 17:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
6337 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6336 +++$+++ 6336 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.283906220E09 +++$+++ Obviously two weren't signed or have been cut. Keep an eye out.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :Obviously two weren't signed or have been cut. Keep an eye out.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 17:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
6338 +++$+++ RevanFan +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6336 +++$+++ 6337 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.283909160E09 +++$+++ Will do.  +++$+++ ::Will do. [[User:RevanFan|RevanFan]] ([[User talk:RevanFan|talk]]) 18:26, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

268481 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268481 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-06 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.220715960E09 +++$+++ Hi, Matisse. I'm looking forward  to this as IMO this crittter was arguably the most important of the Burgess \"weird wonders\". I've responded to your initial comments. I've also taken the liberty of ordering the comments under sub-headings, in case we wind up having a lot - hope you don't mind. --  +++$+++ Hi, Matisse. I'm looking forward  to this as IMO this crittter was arguably the most important of the Burgess "weird wonders". I've responded to your initial comments. I've also taken the liberty of ordering the comments under sub-headings, in case we wind up having a lot - hope you don't mind. -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 08:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
268482 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268481 +++$+++ 268481 +++$+++ 2008-09-06 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.220750040E09 +++$+++ Not at all, since you have followed the directions regarding heading levels!  &mdash; +++$+++ :Not at all, since you have followed the directions regarding heading levels!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:14, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
268483 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268481 +++$+++ 268482 +++$+++ 2008-09-07 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.220774880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the review, Matisse. I had a feeling it was going to be fairly smooth, because ''Opabinia'' is a more focussed, tidy subject than many in paleontology. Give me a call if I can help you any time. --  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the review, Matisse. I had a feeling it was going to be fairly smooth, because ''Opabinia'' is a more focussed, tidy subject than many in paleontology. Give me a call if I can help you any time. -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 01:08, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
268484 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268481 +++$+++ 268483 +++$+++ 2008-09-07 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.220775120E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. It is a very nice article.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::You are welcome. It is a very nice article.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

530626 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-11 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.252704300E09 +++$+++ Would you delete [[:File:Peterson-dumesnil house.jpg]], [[:File:Russmore louisville 1.jpg]] and [[:File:Russmore louisville 2.jpg]], please?  They're taken from NRHP nomination forms that are noted on their image description pages, and as you can read [[:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#some but not all National Park Service photos are public domain|here]], most photos (including these) from nomination forms are private creations, not works of the federal government.  Thanks!   +++$+++ Would you delete [[:File:Peterson-dumesnil house.jpg]], [[:File:Russmore louisville 1.jpg]] and [[:File:Russmore louisville 2.jpg]], please?  They're taken from NRHP nomination forms that are noted on their image description pages, and as you can read [[:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#some but not all National Park Service photos are public domain|here]], most photos (including these) from nomination forms are private creations, not works of the federal government.  Thanks!  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 14:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
530627 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530626 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-12 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.252743540E09 +++$+++ How isn't it clear?  Taken from a document that's not USGov, not PD-old, and no evidence of free license.  At any rate, I've started the deletion discussions for all three; see [[:Commons:Commons:Deletion requests\/2009\/09\/12|here]].   +++$+++ ::How isn't it clear?  Taken from a document that's not USGov, not PD-old, and no evidence of free license.  At any rate, I've started the deletion discussions for all three; see [[:Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/2009/09/12|here]].  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 01:19, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
530628 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530626 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-12 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.252749420E09 +++$+++ HEY ... HEY .... RB forgot to sign an edit .... I got him!  I knew someday he'd make a mistake! ... GOTCHA!  LMAO. ;~) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :::HEY ... HEY .... RB forgot to sign an edit .... I got him!  I knew someday he'd make a mistake! ... GOTCHA!  LMAO. ;~) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 02:57, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
530629 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530626 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-12 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.252759440E09 +++$+++ Tee hee - First time for everything! Actually, it has happened a several times before. Nyttend, I take a conservative approach - if I think there's a chance that it's controversial then I won't do the deletion. I won't argue if someone else speedy deletes it. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::Tee hee - First time for everything! Actually, it has happened a several times before. Nyttend, I take a conservative approach - if I think there's a chance that it's controversial then I won't do the deletion. I won't argue if someone else speedy deletes it. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

6339 +++$+++ Pats1 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-11 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.284196080E09 +++$+++ Should we change the staff template, the team infobox, and Parcells' infobox, or has nothing changed titularly?  +++$+++ Should we change the staff template, the team infobox, and Parcells' infobox, or has nothing changed titularly? [[User:Pats1|<b><font color="#0d254c">Pats</font><font color="#8f8f8f">1</font></b>]] [[User_talk:Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><sup><small>'''T'''</small></sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><small>'''C'''</small></font>]] 02:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
6340 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6339 +++$+++ 6339 +++$+++ 2010-09-11 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.284198120E09 +++$+++ Well he's a \"daily consultant\" but I don't know what has changed as far as his title. I think we can assume his pay hasn't changed haha. And he's still watching every practice like always. I assume it just has more to do with giving Ireland more final say. But until the website changes something (or he leaves, which will probably be soon) I guess it should stay how it is.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :Well he's a "daily consultant" but I don't know what has changed as far as his title. I think we can assume his pay hasn't changed haha. And he's still watching every practice like always. I assume it just has more to do with giving Ireland more final say. But until the website changes something (or he leaves, which will probably be soon) I guess it should stay how it is.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 02:42, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

268485 +++$+++ Edmund Patrick +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-06 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.220726520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your useful input into [[Gilbert du Motier, marquis de Lafayette]]. The extra pair of eyes and thoughts were very valuable. It passed . Ta.  +++$+++ Thanks for your useful input into [[Gilbert du Motier, marquis de Lafayette]]. The extra pair of eyes and thoughts were very valuable. It passed . Ta. [[User:Edmund Patrick|Edmund Patrick]] &ndash;<small>  [[User talk:Edmund Patrick|'''confer''']]</small> 11:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
268486 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268485 +++$+++ 268485 +++$+++ 2008-09-06 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.220750160E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome! &mdash; +++$+++ :You are very welcome! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:16, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

530630 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530630 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-13 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.252830600E09 +++$+++ \u2190 (thread jack) .. Ahhh ... you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_NASCAR&curid=1261750&diff=313481424&oldid=310704729 noticed that] eh?  Don't miss much do ya? ;-) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ← (thread jack) .. Ahhh ... you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_NASCAR&curid=1261750&diff=313481424&oldid=310704729 noticed that] eh?  Don't miss much do ya? ;-) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 01:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
530631 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530630 +++$+++ 530630 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.252832100E09 +++$+++ Tee hee! For some reason I checked your talk page and saw the DYK notification. Please add your DYK to [[WP:NASCAR]]'s DYK section! It's unusual right now, my internet is actually working! The other unusual thing is that I'm watching the Cup race! Double duty, listening to the Cup race while editing the Wiki. I'm going to work on the Daytona 500 polesitters list for as long as my connection permits (or if it gets too late in my time zone). So far I've replaced all of the less-reliably sourced statements with content found at nascar.com. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Tee hee! For some reason I checked your talk page and saw the DYK notification. Please add your DYK to [[WP:NASCAR]]'s DYK section! It's unusual right now, my internet is actually working! The other unusual thing is that I'm watching the Cup race! Double duty, listening to the Cup race while editing the Wiki. I'm going to work on the Daytona 500 polesitters list for as long as my connection permits (or if it gets too late in my time zone). So far I've replaced all of the less-reliably sourced statements with content found at nascar.com. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
530632 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530630 +++$+++ 530631 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.252838100E09 +++$+++ Well, hopefully you don't regret me getting involved in the NASCAR project.  I'd like to think that I've come a long way, and that I'm adding something positive to WP and the nascar project.  I really appreciate your help with the pole article, and I hope it all goes well in the end.  I'll try to remember to list the stuff at the project in the future.  Glad you ISP is working. ;) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ::Well, hopefully you don't regret me getting involved in the NASCAR project.  I'd like to think that I've come a long way, and that I'm adding something positive to WP and the nascar project.  I really appreciate your help with the pole article, and I hope it all goes well in the end.  I'll try to remember to list the stuff at the project in the future.  Glad you ISP is working. ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 03:35, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
530633 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530630 +++$+++ 530632 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.252839120E09 +++$+++ Now you got me puzzled! Why would I regret your help? You've worked on some pretty important topics! You have come a long way as an editor. When I started working with you, you had decent editing skills. Now you've seen how to work an article to Good and possibly featured status! ...the importance of using highly reliable sources. I'm surprised that my internet worked all night. The [[Chase for the Cup]] turned out to be interesting, except former local driver [[Matt Kenseth]] fell 2 spots to out of the Chase. I watched him totally dominate several features when he was a local driver at [[Wisconsin International Raceway]]. In the 30 lap feature, he'd pass the field in about 5 laps. I thought he'd get kicked when he started racing against the guys on TV, but he ended up beating them to win the 2003 Cup. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Now you got me puzzled! Why would I regret your help? You've worked on some pretty important topics! You have come a long way as an editor. When I started working with you, you had decent editing skills. Now you've seen how to work an article to Good and possibly featured status! ...the importance of using highly reliable sources. I'm surprised that my internet worked all night. The [[Chase for the Cup]] turned out to be interesting, except former local driver [[Matt Kenseth]] fell 2 spots to out of the Chase. I watched him totally dominate several features when he was a local driver at [[Wisconsin International Raceway]]. In the 30 lap feature, he'd pass the field in about 5 laps. I thought he'd get kicked when he started racing against the guys on TV, but he ended up beating them to win the 2003 Cup. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:52, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
530634 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530630 +++$+++ 530633 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.252841580E09 +++$+++ Kenseth is simply AWSOME!  I've only been to WIR 3 times, mostly for ASA events.  Wish the banking was a little higher, but a beautiful track.  I enjoyed watching him run before he even got to NASCAR level... hell of a guy!  So laid back, so cool, so professional. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ::::Kenseth is simply AWSOME!  I've only been to WIR 3 times, mostly for ASA events.  Wish the banking was a little higher, but a beautiful track.  I enjoyed watching him run before he even got to NASCAR level... hell of a guy!  So laid back, so cool, so professional. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 04:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
530635 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530630 +++$+++ 530634 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.252868760E09 +++$+++ It's interesting to hear that you've been to WIR, too. I suspected that Slinger, [[Madison International Speedway|Madison]], [[Lake Geneva Raceway]], and WIR were the tracks that would more likely be known nationally, which is why I wrote articles for them instead of other local tracks. I plan to go to [[LaCrosse Fairgrounds Speedway]] at their Oktoberfest on the second weekend of October and write an article for it too because it held ASA races and is a local NASCAR weekly track. Maybe I'll write articles some day for the local tracks that have held national off-road racing events in [[SODA (series)|SODA]] or [[Championship Off-Road Racing|CORR]]. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::It's interesting to hear that you've been to WIR, too. I suspected that Slinger, [[Madison International Speedway|Madison]], [[Lake Geneva Raceway]], and WIR were the tracks that would more likely be known nationally, which is why I wrote articles for them instead of other local tracks. I plan to go to [[LaCrosse Fairgrounds Speedway]] at their Oktoberfest on the second weekend of October and write an article for it too because it held ASA races and is a local NASCAR weekly track. Maybe I'll write articles some day for the local tracks that have held national off-road racing events in [[SODA (series)|SODA]] or [[Championship Off-Road Racing|CORR]]. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

6343 +++$+++ Eagles247 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-28 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.285727940E09 +++$+++ His NFL.com profile says [http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/players\/profile?id=HOW112080 \"Cord Howard\"], as well as his [http:\/\/ramblinwreck.cstv.com\/sports\/m-footbl\/mtt\/howard_cord00.html Georgia Tech bio]. The only place where he is called \"Cordaro\" is at the Bills website. I thought the NFL.com stat pages were considered to be the most accurate? ''' +++$+++ His NFL.com profile says [http://www.nfl.com/players/profile?id=HOW112080 "Cord Howard"], as well as his [http://ramblinwreck.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/howard_cord00.html Georgia Tech bio]. The only place where he is called "Cordaro" is at the Bills website. I thought the NFL.com stat pages were considered to be the most accurate? '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 19:39, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
6344 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6343 +++$+++ 6343 +++$+++ 2010-09-28 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.285727940E09 +++$+++ Went by the Bills website.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :Went by the Bills website.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 19:39, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
6345 +++$+++ Eagles247 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6343 +++$+++ 6344 +++$+++ 2010-09-28 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.285728540E09 +++$+++ Alright, I wasn't sure what to name it when I created it. ''' +++$+++ ::Alright, I wasn't sure what to name it when I created it. '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 19:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

268488 +++$+++ Nergaal +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-07 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.220784240E09 +++$+++ I went through your comments. How does it look now?  +++$+++ I went through your comments. How does it look now? [[User:Nergaal|Nergaal]] ([[User talk:Nergaal|talk]]) 03:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
268489 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268488 +++$+++ 268488 +++$+++ 2008-09-07 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.220850540E09 +++$+++ It looks great!  &mdash; +++$+++ :It looks great!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:09, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

6346 +++$+++ Derild4921 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-30 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.288501200E09 +++$+++ If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]] or ask at [[Wikipedia:Help desk]]. Once you have provided at least one [[WP:V#Sources|reliable source]], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Jonathon Amaya|request that it be undeleted|[[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|request that it be undeleted]]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> [[User:Derild4921|<span style=\"color:green\">Derild<\/span>]][[User talk:Derild4921|<span style=\"color:red\">49<\/span>]][[Special:Contributions\/Derild4921|<span style=\"color:blue\">21<\/span>]] +++$+++ If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]] or ask at [[Wikipedia:Help desk]]. Once you have provided at least one [[WP:V#Sources|reliable source]], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Jonathon Amaya|request that it be undeleted|[[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|request that it be undeleted]]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> [[User:Derild4921|<span style="color:green">Derild</span>]][[User talk:Derild4921|<span style="color:red">49</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Derild4921|<span style="color:blue">21</span>]][[User:Derild4921/Guestbook|<span style="color:orange">☼</span>]] 22:00, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
6347 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6346 +++$+++ 6346 +++$+++ 2010-11-02 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.288740180E09 +++$+++ False.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :False.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 16:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

611244 +++$+++ Mikenorton +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-07 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.291786980E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Geology of Massachusetts]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Geology of Massachusetts|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Geology of Massachusetts]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Geology of Massachusetts|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Mikenorton|Mikenorton]] ([[User talk:Mikenorton|talk]]) 21:43, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
611245 +++$+++ Mikenorton +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611244 +++$+++ 611244 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.291786980E09 +++$+++ I meant to have a look at this earlier, sorry that I took so long to get round to it. I'll try to organise my thoughts about the problems that I see, on the article talk page.  +++$+++ :I meant to have a look at this earlier, sorry that I took so long to get round to it. I'll try to organise my thoughts about the problems that I see, on the article talk page. [[User:Mikenorton|Mikenorton]] ([[User talk:Mikenorton|talk]]) 21:43, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
611246 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611244 +++$+++ 611244 +++$+++ 2010-12-08 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.291810500E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but this isn't notable for Wikipedia. Please read [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|the notability guidelines for organizations and companies]] to understand why the article doesn't meet the guidelines. Try working with articles that are here first and you will likely start to learn what is and is not notable. Over time, you will notice that you have a knack for writing articles that are rather good.  +++$+++ :I'm sorry, but this isn't notable for Wikipedia. Please read [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|the notability guidelines for organizations and companies]] to understand why the article doesn't meet the guidelines. Try working with articles that are here first and you will likely start to learn what is and is not notable. Over time, you will notice that you have a knack for writing articles that are rather good. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 04:15, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

6348 +++$+++ Jsfouche +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-09 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.289372400E09 +++$+++ If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]] or ask at [[Wikipedia:Help desk]]. Once you have provided at least one [[WP:V#Sources|reliable source]], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Matt Kopa|request that it be undeleted|[[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|request that it be undeleted]]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP -->  +++$+++ If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]] or ask at [[Wikipedia:Help desk]]. Once you have provided at least one [[WP:V#Sources|reliable source]], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Matt Kopa|request that it be undeleted|[[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|request that it be undeleted]]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> [[User:jsfouche|<font color="orange">jsfouche  </font><font color="teal">&#9789;&#9790;</font>]] [[User talk:jsfouche|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 23:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
6349 +++$+++ C.Fred +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6348 +++$+++ 6348 +++$+++ 2010-11-09 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.289373240E09 +++$+++ That's pretty much an automatic tagging of an article: '''any biography''' created now which does not cite any reliable sources is subject to tagging for proposed deletion as an unsourced biography of a living person. \u2014''' +++$+++ *That's pretty much an automatic tagging of an article: '''any biography''' created now which does not cite any reliable sources is subject to tagging for proposed deletion as an unsourced biography of a living person. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 23:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

569037 +++$+++ Njschwinn +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569037 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-29 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.162161300E09 +++$+++ I would like to know how exactly i should correct the article. I see it as a simple article for a movie.  +++$+++ I would like to know how exactly i should correct the article. I see it as a simple article for a movie. [[User:Njschwinn|Njschwinn]] 14:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
569038 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569037 +++$+++ 569037 +++$+++ 2006-10-29 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.162184400E09 +++$+++ Hello! Please remember to include a link to the article that you wish to discuss as an aid to memory. Please read [[Wikipedia:Notability (films)]].  A low-budget amateur film posted on to Youtube is far from notable.  +++$+++ :Hello! Please remember to include a link to the article that you wish to discuss as an aid to memory. Please read [[Wikipedia:Notability (films)]].  A low-budget amateur film posted on to Youtube is far from notable. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

530640 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-17 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.253234400E09 +++$+++ Some bad news (at least to me).  I won't be able to get up to WI this fall as I had hoped.  Finances, and circumstances just aren't going to permit it this year.  However, I've been going over some stuff, and it may be that I'll opt-in to a purchase with my mom of a small mini-home early next year so that we can travel a bit more again.  We're down to 4 dogs now, so it might be that a 3 or 4 day weekend, or even a week vacation would be doable if we had that available to us.  She had kind of lost interest in a lot of the race stuff, but my talk and Mark Martin's year (she's liked him since he was a young teen), has kinda rekindled her interest.  I could go on my own, but I do feel uncomfortable leaving her behind at her age and all alone.  The farm is just too much for her to handle on her own, and while I'm not as young and valuable as I once was - I'm better than nothing .. lol.  Well, didn't mean to bore you with my personal drivel, but once I get to blabbing with my friends, sometimes I just don't know when to shut up .. lol.  All my best. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ Some bad news (at least to me).  I won't be able to get up to WI this fall as I had hoped.  Finances, and circumstances just aren't going to permit it this year.  However, I've been going over some stuff, and it may be that I'll opt-in to a purchase with my mom of a small mini-home early next year so that we can travel a bit more again.  We're down to 4 dogs now, so it might be that a 3 or 4 day weekend, or even a week vacation would be doable if we had that available to us.  She had kind of lost interest in a lot of the race stuff, but my talk and Mark Martin's year (she's liked him since he was a young teen), has kinda rekindled her interest.  I could go on my own, but I do feel uncomfortable leaving her behind at her age and all alone.  The farm is just too much for her to handle on her own, and while I'm not as young and valuable as I once was - I'm better than nothing .. lol.  Well, didn't mean to bore you with my personal drivel, but once I get to blabbing with my friends, sometimes I just don't know when to shut up .. lol.  All my best. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 17:40, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
530641 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530640 +++$+++ 530640 +++$+++ 2009-09-18 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.253266020E09 +++$+++ I didn't know that you were thinking about coming to WI. Cool! I don't remember when Mark Martin raced in WI for a year but I've read he was great. Cheers! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I didn't know that you were thinking about coming to WI. Cool! I don't remember when Mark Martin raced in WI for a year but I've read he was great. Cheers! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:27, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

268497 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-08 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.220941200E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I wonder if you could have a look this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Human_bonding&diff=237157560&oldid=234915749 diff] on [[Human bonding]]. The guy seems to have wiped out just about every theory on the subject. Some of it may be crap, but I can't beleive it all is. -- +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I wonder if you could have a look this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Human_bonding&diff=237157560&oldid=234915749 diff] on [[Human bonding]]. The guy seems to have wiped out just about every theory on the subject. Some of it may be crap, but I can't beleive it all is. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 23:20, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
268498 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268497 +++$+++ 268497 +++$+++ 2008-09-09 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.221020520E09 +++$+++ That is one of those articles that should not be under \"Psychology\" but is nonetheless. Any article that has to use dictionary definitions is suspect. Then throw in some out-of-date psychoanalytic thinking.  It is not a professional article and never will be. I like the part about bail bondsman!  There is a whole collection of articles around \"attachment\" and \"bonding\" that are not professional and   have very POV agendas. I do not care what happens to them. They are hopeless and ripe for whomever to stick in whatever they want.   &mdash; +++$+++ :That is one of those articles that should not be under "Psychology" but is nonetheless. Any article that has to use dictionary definitions is suspect. Then throw in some out-of-date psychoanalytic thinking.  It is not a professional article and never will be. I like the part about bail bondsman!  There is a whole collection of articles around "attachment" and "bonding" that are not professional and   have very POV agendas. I do not care what happens to them. They are hopeless and ripe for whomever to stick in whatever they want.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

268499 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-10 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.221112620E09 +++$+++ If you're interested, I've nominated for FAC the second half of the FA [[rongorongo]], which you had commented on during its nomination. It's at [[Decipherment of rongorongo]].  +++$+++ If you're interested, I've nominated for FAC the second half of the FA [[rongorongo]], which you had commented on during its nomination. It's at [[Decipherment of rongorongo]]. [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 22:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
268500 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268499 +++$+++ 268499 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.221200100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. I don't know if I have the stomach to get involved in the bickering of  FAC. I'll keep my eye on it.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know. I don't know if I have the stomach to get involved in the bickering of  FAC. I'll keep my eye on it.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
268501 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268499 +++$+++ 268500 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.221208500E09 +++$+++ No bickering so far. It's eerily quiet.  +++$+++ ::No bickering so far. It's eerily quiet. [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 01:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
268502 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268499 +++$+++ 268501 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.221257520E09 +++$+++ The FAC crowd mostly review their own articles and ignore others. If yours continues to be ignored, I will enter in. &mdash; +++$+++ :::The FAC crowd mostly review their own articles and ignore others. If yours continues to be ignored, I will enter in. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

6356 +++$+++ RevanFan +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-04 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.294140540E09 +++$+++ Why did you remove Ben Garland?  +++$+++ Why did you remove Ben Garland? [[User:RevanFan|RevanFan]] ([[User talk:RevanFan|talk]]) 03:29, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
6357 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6356 +++$+++ 6356 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.294140660E09 +++$+++ He wasn't there before, I just reverted the most recent version.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :He wasn't there before, I just reverted the most recent version.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 03:31, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
6358 +++$+++ RevanFan +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6356 +++$+++ 6357 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.294142820E09 +++$+++ He's on their Reserve\/Military list.  +++$+++ ::He's on their Reserve/Military list. [[User:RevanFan|RevanFan]] ([[User talk:RevanFan|talk]]) 04:07, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
6359 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6356 +++$+++ 6358 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.294142880E09 +++$+++ He wasn't before today's IP edits. Pats removed him a while back.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :::He wasn't before today's IP edits. Pats removed him a while back.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 04:08, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
6360 +++$+++ RevanFan +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6356 +++$+++ 6359 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.294144860E09 +++$+++ He was on there as of December 30. The edit before the Pats edited for the pre-offseason conversion.  +++$+++ ::::He was on there as of December 30. The edit before the Pats edited for the pre-offseason conversion. [[User:RevanFan|RevanFan]] ([[User talk:RevanFan|talk]]) 04:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
6361 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6356 +++$+++ 6360 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.294175880E09 +++$+++ Then shouldn't you be talking to Pats1...?\u25ba''' +++$+++ :::::Then shouldn't you be talking to Pats1...?►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 13:18, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
6362 +++$+++ RevanFan +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6356 +++$+++ 6361 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.294195680E09 +++$+++ Alright, I will.  +++$+++ ::::::Alright, I will. [[User:RevanFan|RevanFan]] ([[User talk:RevanFan|talk]]) 18:48, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

268503 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-12 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.221271200E09 +++$+++ I have attempted to address your comments, just let me know if there is anything else you would like to see tweaked or altered. -- +++$+++ I have attempted to address your comments, just let me know if there is anything else you would like to see tweaked or altered. --[[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 19:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
268504 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268503 +++$+++ 268503 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.221271560E09 +++$+++ O.K.  &mdash; +++$+++ : O.K.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
268505 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268503 +++$+++ 268504 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.221272520E09 +++$+++ And I am glad we could forget our harsh interactions of the past. I am sorry I was like that. Life is chaotic, sometimes I guess it spills over onto the wiki. It has been a pleasure working with you during this GA review. :-)-- +++$+++ ::And I am glad we could forget our harsh interactions of the past. I am sorry I was like that. Life is chaotic, sometimes I guess it spills over onto the wiki. It has been a pleasure working with you during this GA review. :-)--[[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 19:22, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
268506 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268503 +++$+++ 268505 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.221272700E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry too. I can't even remember what it was about!  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I'm sorry too. I can't even remember what it was about!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
268507 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268503 +++$+++ 268506 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.221272880E09 +++$+++ Ha! Me neither. -- +++$+++ ::::Ha! Me neither. --[[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 19:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

530650 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-25 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.253904660E09 +++$+++ I remember someone telling me about a website where you can search newspapers. Was this any of my talk page stalkers? Please let me know! I've hit a wall searching for a reliable source on some content for a FL article I'm working on. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ I remember someone telling me about a website where you can search newspapers. Was this any of my talk page stalkers? Please let me know! I've hit a wall searching for a reliable source on some content for a FL article I'm working on. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 11:51, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
530651 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530650 +++$+++ 530650 +++$+++ 2009-09-25 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.253905080E09 +++$+++ Hadn't thought of that! ... hmmm ... ouch... [http:\/\/www.newspaperarchive.com\/ too expensive], but maybe: [http:\/\/nl.newsbank.com\/nl-search\/we\/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_action=keyword&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_queryname=4000&s_home=home&s_sources=location&p_clear_search=&s_search_type=keyword&s_place=&d_refprod=NewsLibrary this] will help.  I'll check it out too later today. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :Hadn't thought of that! ... hmmm ... ouch... [http://www.newspaperarchive.com/ too expensive], but maybe: [http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_action=keyword&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_queryname=4000&s_home=home&s_sources=location&p_clear_search=&s_search_type=keyword&s_place=&d_refprod=NewsLibrary this] will help.  I'll check it out too later today. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 11:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
530652 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530650 +++$+++ 530651 +++$+++ 2009-09-25 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.253913060E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/news.google.com\/archivesearch? google news archive search] \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :* [http://news.google.com/archivesearch? google news archive search] — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 14:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
530653 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530650 +++$+++ 530650 +++$+++ 2009-09-25 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.253913900E09 +++$+++ <s>DA..<\/s> Daggoneit!!! I can't find anything to justify either Kim Roberson, or Insider Racing News.  AGGGRRRR ... good reading too.  Crap!.  I'll see what I can dig up in the news archives for those 3 refs. ... sigh ... Sorry this is taking so long. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ *<s>DA..</s> Daggoneit!!! I can't find anything to justify either Kim Roberson, or Insider Racing News.  AGGGRRRR ... good reading too.  Crap!.  I'll see what I can dig up in the news archives for those 3 refs. ... sigh ... Sorry this is taking so long. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 14:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
530654 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530650 +++$+++ 530653 +++$+++ 2009-09-25 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.253935980E09 +++$+++ I use [[LexisNexis]], but it isn't free. [[Proquest]] is also decent, you can access it through most public libraries.  +++$+++ :*I use [[LexisNexis]], but it isn't free. [[Proquest]] is also decent, you can access it through most public libraries. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 20:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
530655 +++$+++ JamieS93 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530650 +++$+++ 530650 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.254000540E09 +++$+++ Probably not sufficient for what you're looking for, but the [http:\/\/books.google.com\/ Google Books] search engine also includes some newspapers. I've used it before, and it's pretty good sometimes.  +++$+++ *Probably not sufficient for what you're looking for, but the [http://books.google.com/ Google Books] search engine also includes some newspapers. I've used it before, and it's pretty good sometimes. [[User:JamieS93|<font style="color:#4682b4">'''Jamie'''</font>]]'''[[User talk:JamieS93|<font style="color:#50C878">S93</font>]]''' 14:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

569039 +++$+++ SiobhanHansa +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569039 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-29 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.162173960E09 +++$+++ Hi (aeropagitica).  You blocked <span class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ Hi (aeropagitica).  You blocked <span class="plainlinks">[[User:24.165.95.36|24.165.95.36]] ([[User talk:24.165.95.36|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/24.165.95.36|contribs]] • [http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=24.165.95.36 WHOIS] • [[Special:Blockip/24.165.95.36|block user]] • <font color="002bb8">[{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{urlencode:24.165.95.36}}}} block log]</font>)</span> on [[2006-10-27]] for spamming.  Well they're back and just added the same link to the same article.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Formal_wear&diff=prev&oldid=84436805]  I know this is an IP address, but since it's a direct allocation, and its only edits appear to have been to add external links, I was wondering if you would think about blocking them for a little longer.  Thanks.  --[[User_Talk:SiobhanHansa|Siobhan Hansa]] 18:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
569040 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569039 +++$+++ 569039 +++$+++ 2006-10-29 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.162180320E09 +++$+++ Now tagged with {{tl|blatantvandal}}.  They will be blocked if they vandalise again.  Don't forget to place vandal alerts on [[WP:AIV]] in case I or other admins are away from our computers for a period of time.  This will ensure a rapid response. Regards,  +++$+++ :Now tagged with {{tl|blatantvandal}}.  They will be blocked if they vandalise again.  Don't forget to place vandal alerts on [[WP:AIV]] in case I or other admins are away from our computers for a period of time.  This will ensure a rapid response. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 19:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

6364 +++$+++ Bigtimepeace +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-06 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.294354680E09 +++$+++ Hi Chris, I don't think \"it's a biography, it happened\" remotely justifies restoring [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Cade_McNown&action=historysubmit&diff=406282561&oldid=406279089 this content] to the [[Cade McNown]] article. BLPs absolutely do not include everything that \"happened,\" and I really am having trouble understanding why you think this information belongs in our article. I'd appreciate it if you could respond to the points I make on [[Talk:Cade McNown]] in the \"Legal History\" section. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Hi Chris, I don't think "it's a biography, it happened" remotely justifies restoring [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cade_McNown&action=historysubmit&diff=406282561&oldid=406279089 this content] to the [[Cade McNown]] article. BLPs absolutely do not include everything that "happened," and I really am having trouble understanding why you think this information belongs in our article. I'd appreciate it if you could respond to the points I make on [[Talk:Cade McNown]] in the "Legal History" section. Thanks. --[[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] |  [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 14:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
6365 +++$+++ Bigtimepeace +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6364 +++$+++ 6364 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.294448460E09 +++$+++ You've been editing since I left the above note but have not discussed the issue so I have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Cade_McNown&diff=prev&oldid=406514344 reverted] your recent edit, in part in the hope that you will discuss the issue on the article talk page. It's much better to hash out the matter on the talk page rather than trading reverts. -- +++$+++ :You've been editing since I left the above note but have not discussed the issue so I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cade_McNown&diff=prev&oldid=406514344 reverted] your recent edit, in part in the hope that you will discuss the issue on the article talk page. It's much better to hash out the matter on the talk page rather than trading reverts. --[[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] |  [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 17:01, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
6366 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6364 +++$+++ 6365 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.294450320E09 +++$+++ I just don't really care.\u25ba''' +++$+++ ::I just don't really care.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 17:32, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
6367 +++$+++ Bigtimepeace +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6364 +++$+++ 6366 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.294458060E09 +++$+++ All right then. You reverted me twice so I figured you cared at least somewhat, but if you want to let the matter rest then I obviously have no problem with that. -- +++$+++ :::All right then. You reverted me twice so I figured you cared at least somewhat, but if you want to let the matter rest then I obviously have no problem with that. --[[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] |  [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 19:41, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

268510 +++$+++ Efe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-14 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.221402720E09 +++$+++ Yeah, its fine. Thanks for the help. I actually passed the article without so much copyediting. I'm working on the suggestions. -- +++$+++ Yeah, its fine. Thanks for the help. I actually passed the article without so much copyediting. I'm working on the suggestions. --[[User:Efe|Efe]] ([[User talk:Efe|talk]]) 07:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
268511 +++$+++ Efe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268510 +++$+++ 268510 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.221403920E09 +++$+++ I think I'm done. Please have a reread. Thank you. -- +++$+++ :I think I'm done. Please have a reread. Thank you. --[[User:Efe|Efe]] ([[User talk:Efe|talk]]) 07:52, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
268512 +++$+++ Efe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268510 +++$+++ 268511 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.221463500E09 +++$+++ All done Mattisse. Thank you. -- +++$+++ ::All done Mattisse. Thank you. --[[User:Efe|Efe]] ([[User talk:Efe|talk]]) 00:25, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
268513 +++$+++ Efe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268510 +++$+++ 268512 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.221465660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for passing the article to GA and for the guidance, especially in refining the prose. I really suck at prose, most especially when I hurry things. Thank you. -- +++$+++ :::Thanks for passing the article to GA and for the guidance, especially in refining the prose. I really suck at prose, most especially when I hurry things. Thank you. --[[User:Efe|Efe]] ([[User talk:Efe|talk]]) 01:01, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
268514 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268510 +++$+++ 268513 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.221465780E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. I really enjoyed the article. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::You are welcome. I really enjoyed the article. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
268515 +++$+++ Efe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268510 +++$+++ 268514 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.221466200E09 +++$+++ There are still lots to add in this article. Well, Coldplay is so talkative, and I salute them, I also have lots to write. Will it be ok to call you for some help when its on FAC? -- +++$+++ :::::There are still lots to add in this article. Well, Coldplay is so talkative, and I salute them, I also have lots to write. Will it be ok to call you for some help when its on FAC? --[[User:Efe|Efe]] ([[User talk:Efe|talk]]) 01:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
268516 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268510 +++$+++ 268515 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.221466440E09 +++$+++ Sure. Generally I dislike the nitpicky FAC but I am willing to help you out with copy editing.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::Sure. Generally I dislike the nitpicky FAC but I am willing to help you out with copy editing.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
268517 +++$+++ Efe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268510 +++$+++ 268516 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.221466680E09 +++$+++ Thank you. -- +++$+++ :::::::Thank you. --[[User:Efe|Efe]] ([[User talk:Efe|talk]]) 01:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

530656 +++$+++ Sift&Winnow +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-25 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.253922360E09 +++$+++ --'''<font color=\"#DAA520\"> +++$+++ --'''<font color="#DAA520">[[User:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Sift]]</font><small>&amp;</small><font color="#A0522D">[[User talk:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Winnow]]</font>''' 16:46, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
530657 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.253965500E09 +++$+++ Thank all 3 of you for your answers! I'm sure that several of them will come in handy! I bet Ched will add some of them to his resources list! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thank all 3 of you for your answers! I'm sure that several of them will come in handy! I bet Ched will add some of them to his resources list! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:45, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
530658 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 530657 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.253998020E09 +++$+++ Wow, Badgerlink is excellent! I'm glad my IP is registered as being in Wisconsin so I can access it! Still haven't found what I'm looking for - yet. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Wow, Badgerlink is excellent! I'm glad my IP is registered as being in Wisconsin so I can access it! Still haven't found what I'm looking for - yet. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
530659 +++$+++ Sift&Winnow +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 530658 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.253999880E09 +++$+++ You mean you don't have a library card?? Tsk, tsk!  --'''<font color=\"#DAA520\"> +++$+++ :::You mean you don't have a library card?? Tsk, tsk!  --'''<font color="#DAA520">[[User:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Sift]]</font><small>&amp;</small><font color="#A0522D">[[User talk:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Winnow]]</font>''' 14:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
530660 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 530657 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.254001260E09 +++$+++ I used my library card and got into Badgerlink with no problems-Thanks Sift for letting us know- +++$+++ ::I used my library card and got into Badgerlink with no problems-Thanks Sift for letting us know-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
530661 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.254016740E09 +++$+++ GREAT list of tools, thanks Sift and RB.  I wonder if my Pittsburgh\/Carnegie Library card would get me in to some of that stuff. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ *GREAT list of tools, thanks Sift and RB.  I wonder if my Pittsburgh/Carnegie Library card would get me in to some of that stuff. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 18:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
530662 +++$+++ Sift&Winnow +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.254043200E09 +++$+++ Only Lexis\/Nexis, Proquest, and NewspaperArchive are fee services. The rest are free. --'''<font color=\"#DAA520\"> +++$+++ :Only Lexis/Nexis, Proquest, and NewspaperArchive are fee services. The rest are free. --'''<font color="#DAA520">[[User:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Sift]]</font><small>&amp;</small><font color="#A0522D">[[User talk:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Winnow]]</font>''' 02:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
530663 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.254026760E09 +++$+++ RB, where's that page where we list the books we have?  I just picked up a few more tonight. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ *RB, where's that page where we list the books we have?  I just picked up a few more tonight. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 21:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
530664 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 530663 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.254076380E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport\/Sources]] - it's for motorsport sources. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport/Sources]] - it's for motorsport sources. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 11:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
530665 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 530663 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.254136320E09 +++$+++ I went out and bought 5 NASCAR books ... give me some more time, and I'll try to make the article better. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ::I went out and bought 5 NASCAR books ... give me some more time, and I'll try to make the article better. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 04:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
530666 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 530665 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.254136680E09 +++$+++ We have all the time that you and\/or I need! We both need to be completely comfortable with the end result before I'll want to propose it! I'd love to save some time to work on David Pearson. I'm starting to stack up ideas for new articles that definitely deserve DYK. For example, today I went to the [[SCCA National Championship Runoffs]] at [[Road America]]. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::We have all the time that you and/or I need! We both need to be completely comfortable with the end result before I'll want to propose it! I'd love to save some time to work on David Pearson. I'm starting to stack up ideas for new articles that definitely deserve DYK. For example, today I went to the [[SCCA National Championship Runoffs]] at [[Road America]]. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:18, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
530667 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 530656 +++$+++ 2009-09-30 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.254304740E09 +++$+++ I added my books to the NASCAR library page - also - I've done what I could with the article.  See my re: to you, and a section on what I've done [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:List_of_Daytona_500_pole_position_winners#Check_me here].  Let me know what's next. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ * I added my books to the NASCAR library page - also - I've done what I could with the article.  See my re: to you, and a section on what I've done [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Daytona_500_pole_position_winners#Check_me here].  Let me know what's next. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 02:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

6369 +++$+++ RevanFan +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-19 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.298103360E09 +++$+++ You insulted me again, so I have to notify you that I reported you to [[Administrators'_noticeboard\/Incidents]].  +++$+++ You insulted me again, so I have to notify you that I reported you to [[Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents]]. [[User:RevanFan|RevanFan]] ([[User talk:RevanFan|talk]]) 00:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
6370 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6369 +++$+++ 6369 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.298107680E09 +++$+++ Oh my god, you are a bitch.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :Oh my god, you are a bitch.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 01:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
6371 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6369 +++$+++ 6369 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.298168760E09 +++$+++ I cannot express how little I care.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :I cannot express how little I care.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 18:26, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

268518 +++$+++ HJensen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268518 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-09 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.221019320E09 +++$+++ Hi. I have finally installed the promised section on Zappa's legacy. Comments are most welcome! Cheers. --''' +++$+++ Hi. I have finally installed the promised section on Zappa's legacy. Comments are most welcome! Cheers. --'''[[User:HJensen|HJensen]]''', ''[[User_talk:HJensen|talk]]'' 21:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
268519 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268518 +++$+++ 268518 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.221257700E09 +++$+++ I have not read through your complete article again with its added Legacy section. However, I am convinced upon reading the new Legacy that the article is excellent (based on my past readings of the rest of the article) and definitely FAC quality. Are you going to resubmit it? I can do a copy edit if you are.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I have not read through your complete article again with its added Legacy section. However, I am convinced upon reading the new Legacy that the article is excellent (based on my past readings of the rest of the article) and definitely FAC quality. Are you going to resubmit it? I can do a copy edit if you are.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:15, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
268520 +++$+++ HJensen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268518 +++$+++ 268519 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.221610020E09 +++$+++ It is resubmitted now. Any comments and suggestions are most welcome. Most of the main body is unchanged, so it already reflects your detailed copyedits. I mainly edited the lead to account for the legacy section (and the FA requirements - there were a few things in the old lead that was not mentioned in the article. That is taken care of now). Best, --''' +++$+++ :: It is resubmitted now. Any comments and suggestions are most welcome. Most of the main body is unchanged, so it already reflects your detailed copyedits. I mainly edited the lead to account for the legacy section (and the FA requirements - there were a few things in the old lead that was not mentioned in the article. That is taken care of now). Best, --'''[[User:HJensen|HJensen]]''', ''[[User_talk:HJensen|talk]]'' 17:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
268521 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268518 +++$+++ 268520 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.221613980E09 +++$+++ The Legacy section is a great addition and I can see now that it was needed. You have done very good work and I have registered my '''Support''' of its FAC.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::The Legacy section is a great addition and I can see now that it was needed. You have done very good work and I have registered my '''Support''' of its FAC.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
268522 +++$+++ HJensen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268518 +++$+++ 268521 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.221619200E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much! --''' +++$+++ :::: Thank you so much! --'''[[User:HJensen|HJensen]]''', ''[[User_talk:HJensen|talk]]'' 19:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

6376 +++$+++ Giants27 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6376 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311725640E09 +++$+++ What do you mean he's a street free agent? All I know is that all free agents, minus undrafted ones, cannot sign until Friday. Plus, he has only agreed to terms with the Colts, so from what I can tell, it's not official.--''' +++$+++ What do you mean he's a street free agent? All I know is that all free agents, minus undrafted ones, cannot sign until Friday. Plus, he has only agreed to terms with the Colts, so from what I can tell, it's not official.--'''[[User:Giants27|<font face="Bauhaus 93" color="blue" size="2">Giants27</font>]]<small>([[User talk:Giants27|<font color="red">T</font>]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/Giants27|<font color="red">C</font>]])</small>''' 17:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
6377 +++$+++ Giants27 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6376 +++$+++ 6376 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.311725700E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/indiana.sbnation.com\/indianapolis-colts\/2011\/7\/26\/2294780\/colts-sign-former-ball-state-qb-nate-davis This] report also says that he cannot sign until Friday.--''' +++$+++ :[http://indiana.sbnation.com/indianapolis-colts/2011/7/26/2294780/colts-sign-former-ball-state-qb-nate-davis This] report also says that he cannot sign until Friday.--'''[[User:Giants27|<font face="Bauhaus 93" color="blue" size="2">Giants27</font>]]<small>([[User talk:Giants27|<font color="red">T</font>]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/Giants27|<font color="red">C</font>]])</small>''' 17:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
6378 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6376 +++$+++ 6376 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.311725820E09 +++$+++ Also, I just don't care.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :Also, I just don't care.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 17:17, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
6379 +++$+++ Giants27 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6376 +++$+++ 6378 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311726060E09 +++$+++ Ugh, whatever.--''' +++$+++ ::Ugh, whatever.--'''[[User:Giants27|<font face="Bauhaus 93" color="blue" size="2">Giants27</font>]]<small>([[User talk:Giants27|<font color="red">T</font>]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/Giants27|<font color="red">C</font>]])</small>''' 17:21, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
6380 +++$+++ Eagles247 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6376 +++$+++ 6379 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311726540E09 +++$+++ Waivers aren't even open until Thursday. ''' +++$+++ :::Waivers aren't even open until Thursday. '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 17:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

263207 +++$+++ Willmcw +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263207 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-04-29 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.114832820E09 +++$+++ I don't get involved in many VfDs so I am not sure how votres are counted. I do recall that votes by brand-new or unregistered users are generally discounted. If that is so, would it be correct to say that the vote count for [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion\/Stephan Kinsella]] is currently 4-1 in favor of deleting? Do I need to explicitly vote for my vote to count? Thanks for your attendance to the case. Cheers, - +++$+++ I don't get involved in many VfDs so I am not sure how votres are counted. I do recall that votes by brand-new or unregistered users are generally discounted. If that is so, would it be correct to say that the vote count for [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Stephan Kinsella]] is currently 4-1 in favor of deleting? Do I need to explicitly vote for my vote to count? Thanks for your attendance to the case. Cheers, -[[User:Willmcw|Willmcw]] 20:47, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
263208 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263207 +++$+++ 263207 +++$+++ 2005-04-29 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.114834800E09 +++$+++ I would insert the word '''delete''' in you original nomination just to be on the safe side. Hope this helps.  +++$+++ :I would insert the word '''delete''' in you original nomination just to be on the safe side. Hope this helps. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 21:20, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
263209 +++$+++ Willmcw +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263207 +++$+++ 263208 +++$+++ 2005-04-29 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.114835340E09 +++$+++ Thanks. - +++$+++ ::Thanks. -[[User:Willmcw|Willmcw]] 21:29, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)

530668 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530668 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-27 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.254035100E09 +++$+++ Hi, Royalbroil. Given your history of involvement with both NRHP topics and general geographic articles, I think you might be a good candidate to step in at [[Poquetanuck]] (''which probably should be renamed to \"Poquetanuck, Connecticut,\" but that's the least of our worries right now'') and [[Talk:Poquetanuck]] to help mediate (between Doncram and me). Acroterion has been playing mediator between us, but he's away for now, and things are rapidly getting weird. Can you help, or would you prefer that I find someone else? -- +++$+++ Hi, Royalbroil. Given your history of involvement with both NRHP topics and general geographic articles, I think you might be a good candidate to step in at [[Poquetanuck]] (''which probably should be renamed to "Poquetanuck, Connecticut," but that's the least of our worries right now'') and [[Talk:Poquetanuck]] to help mediate (between Doncram and me). Acroterion has been playing mediator between us, but he's away for now, and things are rapidly getting weird. Can you help, or would you prefer that I find someone else? --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 00:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
530669 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530668 +++$+++ 530668 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.254076620E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I've never got involved with mediation type things - It's not one of my talents or interests. I've always avoid drama. Besides, I'm gone all weekend, just popping in right now. I may do a quick comment before I have to leave for the day. My talk page sure is busy for someone who's \"gone\"! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Sorry, I've never got involved with mediation type things - It's not one of my talents or interests. I've always avoid drama. Besides, I'm gone all weekend, just popping in right now. I may do a quick comment before I have to leave for the day. My talk page sure is busy for someone who's "gone"! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 11:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
530670 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530668 +++$+++ 530669 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.254089460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply. I can relate to your lack of interest in this sort of thing. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the reply. I can relate to your lack of interest in this sort of thing. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 15:11, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

569042 +++$+++ Elomis +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569042 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-29 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.162189080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Elomis|Elomis]] 22:18, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
569043 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569042 +++$+++ 569042 +++$+++ 2006-10-29 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.162189320E09 +++$+++ Yes, they keep popping up all over the place! I do wish them well and tell them about Myspace if they don't already know.  Perhaps one of them will make it back as a notable band one day! Regards,  +++$+++ :Yes, they keep popping up all over the place! I do wish them well and tell them about Myspace if they don't already know.  Perhaps one of them will make it back as a notable band one day! Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

6382 +++$+++ RevanFan +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6382 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312266120E09 +++$+++ You happy about Taylor coming back to Miami?  +++$+++ You happy about Taylor coming back to Miami? [[User:RevanFan|RevanFan]] ([[User talk:RevanFan|talk]]) 23:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
6383 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6382 +++$+++ 6382 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.312266360E09 +++$+++ Yes. I mean even if you ignore the sentimental stuff, the Dolphins needed OLB depth like crazy and he's still very capable of that.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :Yes. I mean even if you ignore the sentimental stuff, the Dolphins needed OLB depth like crazy and he's still very capable of that.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 23:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

88445 +++$+++  +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-20 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.111311660E09 +++$+++ The difference is that the fourth image isn't used in an article. Those images can only be used according to a [[fair use]] claim, and that claim would depend on what page it's used in. If a \"fair use\" image isn't actually ''used'' in an article, then it isn't a fair use. (If it were used, I wouldn't want to delete it.) Do you think it should be used? &ndash;  +++$+++ The difference is that the fourth image isn't used in an article. Those images can only be used according to a [[fair use]] claim, and that claim would depend on what page it's used in. If a "fair use" image isn't actually ''used'' in an article, then it isn't a fair use. (If it were used, I wouldn't want to delete it.) Do you think it should be used? &ndash; [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]]) ([[Wikipedia:Image sleuthing|sleuth]])</sup> 01:41, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
88446 +++$+++  +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88445 +++$+++ 88445 +++$+++ 2005-03-20 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.111314420E09 +++$+++ Yes you're right. I'll list them at [[Wikipedia:Image sleuthing]], and we'll see what we find out. &ndash;  +++$+++ :Yes you're right. I'll list them at [[Wikipedia:Image sleuthing]], and we'll see what we find out. &ndash; [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]]) ([[Wikipedia:Image sleuthing|sleuth]])</sup> 02:27, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)

6384 +++$+++ Giants27 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6384 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.312520340E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion\/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ''' +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> '''[[User:Giants27|<font face="Bauhaus 93" color="blue" size="2">Giants27</font>]]<small>([[User talk:Giants27|<font color="red">T</font>]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/Giants27|<font color="red">C</font>]])</small>''' 21:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
6385 +++$+++ Giants27 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6384 +++$+++ 6384 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.312522980E09 +++$+++ Where are you seeing that he was on the active roster? [http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/player\/dorianbrooks\/496984\/profile NFL.com] has nothing.--''' +++$+++ :Where are you seeing that he was on the active roster? [http://www.nfl.com/player/dorianbrooks/496984/profile NFL.com] has nothing.--'''[[User:Giants27|<font face="Bauhaus 93" color="blue" size="2">Giants27</font>]]<small>([[User talk:Giants27|<font color="red">T</font>]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/Giants27|<font color="red">C</font>]])</small>''' 22:43, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
6386 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6384 +++$+++ 6385 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312523220E09 +++$+++ He was promoted to the active roster with [[Maurkice Pouncey]] went on IR.\u25ba''' +++$+++ ::He was promoted to the active roster with [[Maurkice Pouncey]] went on IR.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 22:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
6387 +++$+++ Eagles247 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6384 +++$+++ 6386 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.312524960E09 +++$+++ FWIW he wasn't even activated for the Super Bowl. ''' +++$+++ :::FWIW he wasn't even activated for the Super Bowl. '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 23:16, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

268529 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268529 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-16 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.221572220E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for reviewing, I have made some edits now. :) Also, how can you not have seen a single ''Simpsons'' episode? Have you been living under a rock the past 20 years? ;)  +++$+++ Thanks a lot for reviewing, I have made some edits now. :) Also, how can you not have seen a single ''Simpsons'' episode? Have you been living under a rock the past 20 years? ;) [[User:Theleftorium|<font color="#A04652"><b>The</b></font><font color="#A00952" ><b>Le</b></font><font color="#AD5160"><b>ft</b></font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="#C15563"><b>orium</b></font>]] 06:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
268530 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268529 +++$+++ 268529 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.221604020E09 +++$+++ Yes!  &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

530675 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-22 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.256252580E09 +++$+++ Hey RB, how's things going here?  Sorry I've been away for a bit, I've been on the road - and to be honest, I needed a break from the wiki.  Where are we on this article.  I just did a brief skim-through of the article and talk page.  IIRC, there was something about the \"second round qualify\" vs. \"top 35\" that we wanted to flesh-out on the article, but I don't remember the details or links.  I'm home now, so let me know if there's anything that I can do to move things along - or where we are on the whole deal.  Other than that, I'll get back to work on some of the red-link \"19xx in NASCAR\" articles, and maybe a couple DYK things.  Will start on Dale Earnhardt too here sometime in Nov. hopefully.  Any others that you'd like to see some work done on?  Hope to talk to ya soon buddy, hope all is well. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ Hey RB, how's things going here?  Sorry I've been away for a bit, I've been on the road - and to be honest, I needed a break from the wiki.  Where are we on this article.  I just did a brief skim-through of the article and talk page.  IIRC, there was something about the "second round qualify" vs. "top 35" that we wanted to flesh-out on the article, but I don't remember the details or links.  I'm home now, so let me know if there's anything that I can do to move things along - or where we are on the whole deal.  Other than that, I'll get back to work on some of the red-link "19xx in NASCAR" articles, and maybe a couple DYK things.  Will start on Dale Earnhardt too here sometime in Nov. hopefully.  Any others that you'd like to see some work done on?  Hope to talk to ya soon buddy, hope all is well. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 16:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
530676 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530675 +++$+++ 530675 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.256273880E09 +++$+++ All is well with me! I hope it is with you too. My internet is not well, down probably 75% of the time I want to use it. I wrote a bitchy letter, got 2 months free internet. Of course, 2 months of horrible connection doesn't help me much. That's why I'm not on here much - barely have time to check email a lot of the time. I did work on my David Pearson sandbox article all last night from my book reference - finally made progress on something. I need to create sections for how the qualifying was done before and after the Top 35 rule went into effect. You have done the before section. Next we somehow need to find time to use the great Jayski explanation about how it works. Otherwise the article is in good shape. I did some research - the 2 main NASCAR biographies that readers check out are Dale Earnhardt and Richard Petty so they are the best thing to focus on since you are asking. I'll try to find some library references for Pearson so I have something to do when my internet is down. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :All is well with me! I hope it is with you too. My internet is not well, down probably 75% of the time I want to use it. I wrote a bitchy letter, got 2 months free internet. Of course, 2 months of horrible connection doesn't help me much. That's why I'm not on here much - barely have time to check email a lot of the time. I did work on my David Pearson sandbox article all last night from my book reference - finally made progress on something. I need to create sections for how the qualifying was done before and after the Top 35 rule went into effect. You have done the before section. Next we somehow need to find time to use the great Jayski explanation about how it works. Otherwise the article is in good shape. I did some research - the 2 main NASCAR biographies that readers check out are Dale Earnhardt and Richard Petty so they are the best thing to focus on since you are asking. I'll try to find some library references for Pearson so I have something to do when my internet is down. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 21:58, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

6388 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312528200E09 +++$+++ He was on the active roster, plain and simple.\u25ba''' +++$+++ He was on the active roster, plain and simple.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 00:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
6389 +++$+++ Eagles247 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6388 +++$+++ 6388 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.312530540E09 +++$+++ Which does not help him pass [[WP:NSPORT]] or [[WP:ATH]]. ''' +++$+++ :Which does not help him pass [[WP:NSPORT]] or [[WP:ATH]]. '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 00:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
6390 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6388 +++$+++ 6389 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312531860E09 +++$+++ Then the policy should be changed. If he'd been on the Packers' he'd bee a Super Bowl champion. Being on the 53-man roster of a Super Bowl team is a bigger accomplishment than being the most prolific player in arena history.\u25ba''' +++$+++ ::Then the policy should be changed. If he'd been on the Packers' he'd bee a Super Bowl champion. Being on the 53-man roster of a Super Bowl team is a bigger accomplishment than being the most prolific player in arena history.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 01:11, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
6391 +++$+++ Eagles247 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6388 +++$+++ 6390 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.312537020E09 +++$+++ If he played in that game, yes, but he didn't. And no, the most prolific arena football player would still be more notable. ''' +++$+++ :::If he played in that game, yes, but he didn't. And no, the most prolific arena football player would still be more notable. '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 02:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
6392 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6388 +++$+++ 6391 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.312540620E09 +++$+++ No, he wouldn't. The NFL is the top level of the sport, and for a person in the AFL, no matter how good they might be, to have never reached the NFL, they can never be as accomplished as someone that has. Brooks is an AFC champion and was a full pay-scale member of the Steelers during their Super Bowl appearance in February 2011. The simply fact is ANY player EVER on an NFL active roster during the season is notable enough for inclusion in the encyclopedia.\u25ba''' +++$+++ ::::No, he wouldn't. The NFL is the top level of the sport, and for a person in the AFL, no matter how good they might be, to have never reached the NFL, they can never be as accomplished as someone that has. Brooks is an AFC champion and was a full pay-scale member of the Steelers during their Super Bowl appearance in February 2011. The simply fact is ANY player EVER on an NFL active roster during the season is notable enough for inclusion in the encyclopedia.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 03:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
6393 +++$+++ Eagles247 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6388 +++$+++ 6392 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312540860E09 +++$+++ If you want to start a discussion at [[WT:NSPORT]], go ahead, but as of now, the policy states only players who have actually played in an NFL game are notable enough for inclusion. ''' +++$+++ :::::If you want to start a discussion at [[WT:NSPORT]], go ahead, but as of now, the policy states only players who have actually played in an NFL game are notable enough for inclusion. '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 03:41, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

530678 +++$+++ Sift&Winnow +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-29 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.256809440E09 +++$+++ Sure, I'll take a look at it, but a few questions first. The list articles that I'm familiar with consist largely of a list, with only a cursory introduction. How is it that this article has both content and a list? Is there a reason there's no article on Daytona 500 qualifying procedures, or why the qualifying procedures aren't in the Daytona 500 article, with a cross-reference to the list? Just wondering.  --'''<font color=\"#DAA520\"> +++$+++ Sure, I'll take a look at it, but a few questions first. The list articles that I'm familiar with consist largely of a list, with only a cursory introduction. How is it that this article has both content and a list? Is there a reason there's no article on Daytona 500 qualifying procedures, or why the qualifying procedures aren't in the Daytona 500 article, with a cross-reference to the list? Just wondering.  --'''<font color="#DAA520">[[User:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Sift]]</font><small>&amp;</small><font color="#A0522D">[[User talk:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Winnow]]</font>''' 02:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
530679 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530678 +++$+++ 530678 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.256810400E09 +++$+++ Hmm, good point. I'll discuss with my cohort who's been working on this list article with me. Please delay the review until we discuss and edit. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Hmm, good point. I'll discuss with my cohort who's been working on this list article with me. Please delay the review until we discuss and edit. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

268535 +++$+++ Jordan Timothy James Busson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268535 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-19 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.221834180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your review on [[AT&T Plaza]]. The article nominator has expanded the article, but I am not yet quite sure if the article should pass. Your comments and opinions on the article would be much appreciated. The article [[Louvre Abu Dhabi]] is also in need of a review. If you have time, could you review this article? Thanks in advance, -- +++$+++ Thanks for your review on [[AT&T Plaza]]. The article nominator has expanded the article, but I am not yet quite sure if the article should pass. Your comments and opinions on the article would be much appreciated. The article [[Louvre Abu Dhabi]] is also in need of a review. If you have time, could you review this article? Thanks in advance, --[[User:Jordan Timothy James Busson|<font color="Green">Jor</font>]][[User talk:Jordan Timothy James Busson|<font color="Red">dan</font>]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Jordan Timothy James Busson|<font color="Blue">Contribs</font>]]</sup> 07:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
268536 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268535 +++$+++ 268535 +++$+++ 2008-09-22 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.222128300E09 +++$+++ My reluctance regarding this article is that it has so many quotations for the length of the article content. Another review with less hesitations regarding this issues would be better. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :My reluctance regarding this article is that it has so many quotations for the length of the article content. Another review with less hesitations regarding this issues would be better. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:05, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
268537 +++$+++ Jordan Timothy James Busson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268535 +++$+++ 268536 +++$+++ 2008-09-23 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.222204080E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. I've nominated an article for GA status: [[Louvre Abu Dhabi]]. I was wondering if you might me able to review it and leave me a few suggestions. However, I have to warn you that it quite a few quotations for the length of the actual article... Your feedback would be much appreciated. Thanks, -- +++$+++ ::Hi Mattisse. I've nominated an article for GA status: [[Louvre Abu Dhabi]]. I was wondering if you might me able to review it and leave me a few suggestions. However, I have to warn you that it quite a few quotations for the length of the actual article... Your feedback would be much appreciated. Thanks, --[[User:Jordan Timothy James Busson|<font color="Green">Jor</font>]][[User talk:Jordan Timothy James Busson|<font color="Red">dan</font>]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Jordan Timothy James Busson|<font color="Blue">Contribs</font>]]</sup> 14:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

530681 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-29 10:33:00 +++$+++ 1.256837580E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for the photos you took. They are beautiful.I am glad you added the photo to the [[Gideon Hixon]] article that I started. Willbe gone starting today about north to [[Delta, Wisconsin]].Back on All Saints Day. Thanks again- +++$+++ Many thanks for the photos you took. They are beautiful.I am glad you added the photo to the [[Gideon Hixon]] article that I started. Willbe gone starting today about north to [[Delta, Wisconsin]].Back on All Saints Day. Thanks again-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 10:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
530682 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530681 +++$+++ 530681 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.256842980E09 +++$+++ I wish I could come with you - I LOVE the Ashland\/Bayfield area! It's been too many years since I've been there. Have a great trip! Too bad you don't take photos, that area really needs to be photographed. Thanks for the kind comments about my photos. I have dozens more to add from my La Crosse trip. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I wish I could come with you - I LOVE the Ashland/Bayfield area! It's been too many years since I've been there. Have a great trip! Too bad you don't take photos, that area really needs to be photographed. Thanks for the kind comments about my photos. I have dozens more to add from my La Crosse trip. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:03, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

6394 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6394 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.312540920E09 +++$+++ Or we can just use are heads and behave that way now.\u25ba''' +++$+++ Or we can just use are heads and behave that way now.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 03:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
6395 +++$+++ Eagles247 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6394 +++$+++ 6394 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.312541040E09 +++$+++ Sure, I'll use my head and my fingers and nominate the article (or should I say, sentence) for deletion. ''' +++$+++ :Sure, I'll use my head and my fingers and nominate the article (or should I say, sentence) for deletion. '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 03:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
6396 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ 6394 +++$+++ 6395 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312541100E09 +++$+++ You're better than that.\u25ba''' +++$+++ ::You're better than that.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 03:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

530683 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-29 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.256859180E09 +++$+++ Commons [[:File:Zealous Class.png]] has been at Deletion Requests since July.  Can it be closed now?   +++$+++ Commons [[:File:Zealous Class.png]] has been at Deletion Requests since July.  Can it be closed now?  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 16:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
530684 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530683 +++$+++ 530683 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.256882700E09 +++$+++ Sure, I did. Consensus had been reached. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Sure, I did. Consensus had been reached. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:05, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

268540 +++$+++ HJensen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268540 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-25 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.222364940E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse! Thanks for the support for the Zappa article that have now become FA, and thanks for your kind words on my talk page. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you '''very, very much''' for your major work on the previous FAC. You made tons of valuable copy edits and was energetic and supportive all the way through the process. You are a major asset for Wikipedia, and I am exceptionally grateful for your collaborative efforts. I hope that someday I can \"repay\" your kindness. (I had thought of awarding you some barnstar, but I never really have understood that stuff, and I felt that some honest words were more appropritate.) All the best, --''' +++$+++ Hi Mattisse! Thanks for the support for the Zappa article that have now become FA, and thanks for your kind words on my talk page. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you '''very, very much''' for your major work on the previous FAC. You made tons of valuable copy edits and was energetic and supportive all the way through the process. You are a major asset for Wikipedia, and I am exceptionally grateful for your collaborative efforts. I hope that someday I can "repay" your kindness. (I had thought of awarding you some barnstar, but I never really have understood that stuff, and I felt that some honest words were more appropritate.) All the best, --'''[[User:HJensen|HJensen]]''', ''[[User_talk:HJensen|talk]]'' 10:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
268541 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268540 +++$+++ 268540 +++$+++ 2008-09-26 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.222465560E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. It was a true pleasure. I would be happy to copy edit for you again, if I am still around. Although I consider myself a copy editor, I am withdrawing  from such activity on Wikipedia. But I certainly would help you out any time! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :You are very welcome. It was a true pleasure. I would be happy to copy edit for you again, if I am still around. Although I consider myself a copy editor, I am withdrawing  from such activity on Wikipedia. But I certainly would help you out any time! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

530685 +++$+++ Sift&Winnow +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-31 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.257030360E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you cut and pasted my comments re: List of Daytona 500 pole position winners to the article's talk page. Although I realize that the comments I posted on your talk page can be read by the public, they really weren't intended for the public of the Daytona 500 pole position article. In the future, could you please ask before you do something like that? Thanks!  --'''<font color=\"#DAA520\"> +++$+++ I noticed that you cut and pasted my comments re: List of Daytona 500 pole position winners to the article's talk page. Although I realize that the comments I posted on your talk page can be read by the public, they really weren't intended for the public of the Daytona 500 pole position article. In the future, could you please ask before you do something like that? Thanks!  --'''<font color="#DAA520">[[User:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Sift]]</font><small>&amp;</small><font color="#A0522D">[[User talk:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Winnow]]</font>''' 16:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
530686 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530685 +++$+++ 530685 +++$+++ 2009-10-31 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.257031140E09 +++$+++ That's likely my fault S&W.  I've been pushing RB for input on this article for a while now.  My apologies. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ :That's likely my fault S&W.  I've been pushing RB for input on this article for a while now.  My apologies. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 16:19, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
530687 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530685 +++$+++ 530686 +++$+++ 2009-10-31 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.257034560E09 +++$+++ My apologies! I thought I was real specific in my request stating that I wanted a section on the article's talk page so I was confused why you had put them on my talk page. I thought the intention of the comments were to improve the article and I guessed they were accidentally misplaced. I have undone my overstep. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::My apologies! I thought I was real specific in my request stating that I wanted a section on the article's talk page so I was confused why you had put them on my talk page. I thought the intention of the comments were to improve the article and I guessed they were accidentally misplaced. I have undone my overstep. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 17:16, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
530688 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530685 +++$+++ 530687 +++$+++ 2009-10-31 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.257036060E09 +++$+++ I'll admit - it caught me a bit off guard as well.  Not really sure what to think at this point. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ::: I'll admit - it caught me a bit off guard as well.  Not really sure what to think at this point. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 17:41, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

268542 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-25 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.222330500E09 +++$+++ Please forgive me for eavesdropping; just now went to Malleus's talk and happened upon your aXXo  thread. Replied '''[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum&diff=240797152&oldid=240796984 here]''' [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ Please forgive me for eavesdropping; just now went to Malleus's talk and happened upon your aXXo  thread. Replied '''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum&diff=240797152&oldid=240796984 here]''' [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 01:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
268543 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268542 +++$+++ 268542 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.222576800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your encouragement and open mindedness.  I just now noticed your comment or I would have answered earlier. Perhaps I will ask you to review it! &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks for your encouragement and open mindedness.  I just now noticed your comment or I would have answered earlier. Perhaps I will ask you to review it! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

6399 +++$+++ Tadakuni +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6399 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-12 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.208041980E09 +++$+++ Hi, this is a question in regards to your recent edit on [[Iinuma Sadakichi]]-- if he was in the Imperial Japanese Army, wouldn't he count as \"Japanese military personnel\"? Just wanted to make sure if there was some nuance I was missing. Thanks. - +++$+++ Hi, this is a question in regards to your recent edit on [[Iinuma Sadakichi]]-- if he was in the Imperial Japanese Army, wouldn't he count as "Japanese military personnel"? Just wanted to make sure if there was some nuance I was missing. Thanks. -[[User:Tadakuni|Tadakuni]] ([[User talk:Tadakuni|talk]]) 16:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
6400 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6399 +++$+++ 6399 +++$+++ 2008-04-18 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.208527800E09 +++$+++ Hello Tadakuni! Are you sure that he served in the Imperial Japanese Army? If so, I deleted the category in error and apologize. However, per the Japanese wikipedia, Iinuma served in the early Meiji government's Ministry of Engineering (Kobusho) from 1872 as a telephone specialist, and later served in the forerunner of the Ministry of Communications. I did not see any mention of military service, but if he was indeed in the army, his period of service must have been quite short.Do you have any other details? -- +++$+++ : Hello Tadakuni! Are you sure that he served in the Imperial Japanese Army? If so, I deleted the category in error and apologize. However, per the Japanese wikipedia, Iinuma served in the early Meiji government's Ministry of Engineering (Kobusho) from 1872 as a telephone specialist, and later served in the forerunner of the Ministry of Communications. I did not see any mention of military service, but if he was indeed in the army, his period of service must have been quite short.Do you have any other details? --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 07:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
6401 +++$+++ Tadakuni +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6399 +++$+++ 6400 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.215908100E09 +++$+++ I apologize for taking so long to reply; I've been away from Wikipedia for quite some time. [http:\/\/www.geocities.co.jp\/SilkRoad-Lake\/6618\/honmon\/21.html This] says he was an army captain during the Sino-Japanese war. I would rather get a print resource, though; I'm sure I have one, I just have to dig it up. Thank you for understanding. - +++$+++ ::I apologize for taking so long to reply; I've been away from Wikipedia for quite some time. [http://www.geocities.co.jp/SilkRoad-Lake/6618/honmon/21.html This] says he was an army captain during the Sino-Japanese war. I would rather get a print resource, though; I'm sure I have one, I just have to dig it up. Thank you for understanding. -[[User:Tadakuni|Tadakuni]] ([[User talk:Tadakuni|talk]]) 17:15, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

268544 +++$+++ GaryColemanFan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-27 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.222576080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for offering to review the article. I addressed the concern you brought up. When you have a chance, please let me know if anything else needs to be fixed. Thanks again,  +++$+++ Thanks for offering to review the article. I addressed the concern you brought up. When you have a chance, please let me know if anything else needs to be fixed. Thanks again, [[User:GaryColemanFan|GaryColemanFan]] ([[User talk:GaryColemanFan|talk]]) 21:28, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
268545 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268544 +++$+++ 268544 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.222576560E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. I like your articles. They are fun to read.  &mdash; +++$+++ :You are welcome. I like your articles. They are fun to read.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

530689 +++$+++ Sift&Winnow +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-31 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.257038940E09 +++$+++ I apparently misread your request to put the comments on the article's talk page. I would have written them in a more formal style if I had known they were going there. I was used to just sending the comments you as I have in the past. Sorry.  No harm, no foul.  --'''<font color=\"#DAA520\"> +++$+++ I apparently misread your request to put the comments on the article's talk page. I would have written them in a more formal style if I had known they were going there. I was used to just sending the comments you as I have in the past. Sorry.  No harm, no foul.  --'''<font color="#DAA520">[[User:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Sift]]</font><small>&amp;</small><font color="#A0522D">[[User talk:Sift&#x26;Winnow|Winnow]]</font>''' 18:29, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
530690 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ 2009-11-01 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.257074940E09 +++$+++ I think that the tone is fine, but it's not a big deal - nothing worry about. I'll just keep the comments here on my talk page because I don't want you to be uncomfortable. I'm happy to hear that everything's fine because I REALLY appreciate your thorough proofreading abilities! Peer reviews like I requested are almost always done on the article's talk page because they are improvement commentary specific to the article. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I think that the tone is fine, but it's not a big deal - nothing worry about. I'll just keep the comments here on my talk page because I don't want you to be uncomfortable. I'm happy to hear that everything's fine because I REALLY appreciate your thorough proofreading abilities! Peer reviews like I requested are almost always done on the article's talk page because they are improvement commentary specific to the article. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:29, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
530691 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ 2009-11-05 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.257483900E09 +++$+++ Got the articles done-they were in redlinks for a long time and that drove myself a little crazy-thanks- +++$+++ :Got the articles done-they were in redlinks for a long time and that drove myself a little crazy-thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 21:05, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
530692 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ 530691 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.257495240E09 +++$+++ I don't think that I've ever been to either. It's a good question with how many roads I've traveled in Wisconsin. I've been highlighting every time I travel down a Wisconsin road on state road maps since I was 16 and the map is getting VERY orange. I took pictures of the western terminus of the [[Merrimac Ferry]] last February but that's it. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I don't think that I've ever been to either. It's a good question with how many roads I've traveled in Wisconsin. I've been highlighting every time I travel down a Wisconsin road on state road maps since I was 16 and the map is getting VERY orange. I took pictures of the western terminus of the [[Merrimac Ferry]] last February but that's it. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
530693 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ 530692 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.257500580E09 +++$+++ I refuse to take any blame for your map getting oranger. Wisconsin doesn't even have an [[:Orange County]]! -- +++$+++ :::I refuse to take any blame for your map getting oranger. Wisconsin doesn't even have an [[:Orange County]]! --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  &#x007C;  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 01:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
530694 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ 530693 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.257501000E09 +++$+++ NICE! Thanks for the humor, Orangemike! Many counties in eastern Wisconsin counties ''look'' like orange county on my map - drove the county roads even! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::NICE! Thanks for the humor, Orangemike! Many counties in eastern Wisconsin counties ''look'' like orange county on my map - drove the county roads even! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
530695 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.257496620E09 +++$+++ Many thanks-Hope you are doing well +++$+++ :Many thanks-Hope you are doing well[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 00:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
530696 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ 530695 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.257500280E09 +++$+++ I am doing well! I'm leaving early from work tomorrow to head to [[Amberg, Wisconsin]] for the weekend at my uncle's place, so I won't be checking much until Sunday. Have a great weekend, ya all! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I am doing well! I'm leaving early from work tomorrow to head to [[Amberg, Wisconsin]] for the weekend at my uncle's place, so I won't be checking much until Sunday. Have a great weekend, ya all! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:38, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
530697 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ 530689 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.257538980E09 +++$+++ Have a nice time-Thanks- +++$+++ :Have a nice time-Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 12:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

268546 +++$+++ Nichalp +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268546 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-29 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.222729140E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattise, thanks for the copyedits to the page. I've also clarified on the terrorising villagers bit on [[Talk:Manu  Sharma]]. Do let me know if it makes sense.  +++$+++ Hi Mattise, thanks for the copyedits to the page. I've also clarified on the terrorising villagers bit on [[Talk:Manu  Sharma]]. Do let me know if it makes sense. [[user:Nichalp|<font color="#0082B8">=Nichalp</font>]] [[User Talk:Nichalp|<font color="#0082B8">«Talk»=</font>]] 15:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
268547 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268546 +++$+++ 268546 +++$+++ 2008-09-29 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.222729440E09 +++$+++ Yes, that fixes it. Thanks!  &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes, that fixes it. Thanks!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:04, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

525355 +++$+++ Philbentley +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525355 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-15 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.181924340E09 +++$+++ Cheers  +++$+++ Cheers [[User:Philbentley|Philbentley]] 09:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
525356 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525355 +++$+++ 525355 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.181929860E09 +++$+++ Response at [[Portal_talk:Medicine#Template]]. -- +++$+++ :Response at [[Portal_talk:Medicine#Template]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 10:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

6404 +++$+++ Ascidian  +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-13 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.208144520E09 +++$+++ Any help to improve these articles (or feedback for my edits) would be much appreciated. regards,  +++$+++ Any help to improve these articles (or feedback for my edits) would be much appreciated. regards, [[user:Ascidian | <font color="blue" face="arial narrow">ascidian</font>]] |[[user talk:Ascidian | <font color="green" face="arial narrow">talk-to-me</font>]] 20:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
6405 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6404 +++$+++ 6404 +++$+++ 2008-04-18 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.208527860E09 +++$+++ Hello Ascidian! I will do what I can to help! -- +++$+++ :Hello Ascidian! I will do what I can to help! --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 07:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

6406 +++$+++ Oda Mari +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6406 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-20 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.208731560E09 +++$+++ Hi! Saw your message. According to [[:ja:\u660e\u6cbb#\u6539\u5143|the ja article Meiji]] and [[:ja:\u6176\u5fdc#\u6539\u5143|Keio]],  Meiji actually started on october 23, 1868 though,  legally the Meiji started on January 25, 1968. That's why I moved the article but I'm confused now. What do you think?   +++$+++ Hi! Saw your message. According to [[:ja:明治#改元|the ja article Meiji]] and [[:ja:慶応#改元|Keio]],  Meiji actually started on october 23, 1868 though,  legally the Meiji started on January 25, 1968. That's why I moved the article but I'm confused now. What do you think?  [[User:Oda Mari|Oda Mari]] <small>([[User talk:Oda Mari|talk]])</small> 15:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
6407 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6406 +++$+++ 6406 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.209645960E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... Emperor Meiji took the throne in January, but the ''nengo'' was not officially changed until October... Nitpicking, I would say that since WP:MOS-JA says ''since the start of the Meiji era'', the naming order should change from October 23 1868 births, but I guess the argument could be made either way. Then again, I am biased since I am of the minority opinion and think that ALL Japanese names should be given in Japanese order, i.e. Family name, given name. -- +++$+++ :Hmmm... Emperor Meiji took the throne in January, but the ''nengo'' was not officially changed until October... Nitpicking, I would say that since WP:MOS-JA says ''since the start of the Meiji era'', the naming order should change from October 23 1868 births, but I guess the argument could be made either way. Then again, I am biased since I am of the minority opinion and think that ALL Japanese names should be given in Japanese order, i.e. Family name, given name. --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 05:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

6408 +++$+++ Rlandmann +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-28 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.209450780E09 +++$+++ You might also like to check out the missing aircraft lists - there are a few Japanese types still to cover under the main manufacturer types. Once those lists have been completed (late 2009 at current rate of progress), Wikipedia will have become the most comprehensive encyclopedia of aircraft ever published... :) -- +++$+++ You might also like to check out the missing aircraft lists - there are a few Japanese types still to cover under the main manufacturer types. Once those lists have been completed (late 2009 at current rate of progress), Wikipedia will have become the most comprehensive encyclopedia of aircraft ever published... :) --[[User:Rlandmann|Rlandmann]] ([[User talk:Rlandmann|talk]]) 23:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
6409 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6408 +++$+++ 6408 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.209645960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the challenge! The aircraft you mention are indeed very obscure, and it may take some time to locate info, but I will see what I can do. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the challenge! The aircraft you mention are indeed very obscure, and it may take some time to locate info, but I will see what I can do. --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 05:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

268554 +++$+++ Taprobanus +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-03 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.223028600E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for your comments. Although I am not the primary author, I will work on your suggestions. +++$+++ Thank you very much for your comments. Although I am not the primary author, I will work on your suggestions.[[User:Taprobanus|Taprobanus]] ([[User talk:Taprobanus|talk]]) 03:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
268555 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268554 +++$+++ 268554 +++$+++ 2008-10-04 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.223173020E09 +++$+++ O.K. I hope you don't mind, but I did copy edit it, many for Mos issues.  &mdash; +++$+++ :O.K. I hope you don't mind, but I did copy edit it, many for Mos issues.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

6411 +++$+++ Mentatus +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-25 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.214451360E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've just seen that you added a B-class checklist for this article. Could you please explain why did you rate the 4th item (\"It is free from major grammatical errors\") negatively? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi, I've just seen that you added a B-class checklist for this article. Could you please explain why did you rate the 4th item ("It is free from major grammatical errors") negatively? Thanks, [[User:Mentatus|Mentatus]] ([[User talk:Mentatus|talk]]) 20:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
6412 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6411 +++$+++ 6411 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 06:54:00 +++$+++ 1.214920440E09 +++$+++ I feel that the sub-section \"Duties\" needs to be written in a more encyclopedic format. While there is noting wrong with a bullet-point list of duties, an introductary paragraph that does not begin with \"Its\" would go a long way to improving the article. -- +++$+++ : I feel that the sub-section "Duties" needs to be written in a more encyclopedic format. While there is noting wrong with a bullet-point list of duties, an introductary paragraph that does not begin with "Its" would go a long way to improving the article. --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 06:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
6413 +++$+++ Mentatus +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6411 +++$+++ 6412 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 09:01:00 +++$+++ 1.214928060E09 +++$+++ Point duly taken. An introductory paragraph in the \"Duties\" sub-section is a good idea, this section definitely needs to be refined. However, what does that have to do with \"major grammatical errors\"? It is an issue regarding format and structure, not grammar, isn't it? Thanks for your feedback,  +++$+++ :: Point duly taken. An introductory paragraph in the "Duties" sub-section is a good idea, this section definitely needs to be refined. However, what does that have to do with "major grammatical errors"? It is an issue regarding format and structure, not grammar, isn't it? Thanks for your feedback, [[User:Mentatus|Mentatus]] ([[User talk:Mentatus|talk]]) 09:01, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
6414 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6411 +++$+++ 6411 +++$+++ 2008-07-02 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.215008460E09 +++$+++ There are also a number of minor grammatical and English-language usage issues throughout the article - while nothing really \"major\", I felt that the number was enough to warrant the negative rating (which is, after all, somewhat arbitrary). If you are planning to refine the \"Duties\" sub-section, it would be nice if you could give the rest of the article a good look-over. -- +++$+++ :There are also a number of minor grammatical and English-language usage issues throughout the article - while nothing really "major", I felt that the number was enough to warrant the negative rating (which is, after all, somewhat arbitrary). If you are planning to refine the "Duties" sub-section, it would be nice if you could give the rest of the article a good look-over. --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 07:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
6415 +++$+++ Mentatus +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6411 +++$+++ 6414 +++$+++ 2008-07-02 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.215009780E09 +++$+++ Could you be more specific regarding the \"minor grammatical and English-language usage issues\"? Thanks,  +++$+++ :: Could you be more specific regarding the "minor grammatical and English-language usage issues"? Thanks, [[User:Mentatus|Mentatus]] ([[User talk:Mentatus|talk]]) 07:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

268556 +++$+++ Redtigerxyz +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-03 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.223058540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the review. I have addressed your concerns.-- +++$+++ Thanks for the review. I have addressed your concerns.--[[User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] ([[User talk:Redtigerxyz|talk]]) 11:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
268557 +++$+++ Redtigerxyz +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268556 +++$+++ 268556 +++$+++ 2008-10-04 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.223145540E09 +++$+++ I have addressed most of your concerns.-- +++$+++ : I have addressed most of your concerns.--[[User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] ([[User talk:Redtigerxyz|talk]]) 11:39, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
268558 +++$+++ Redtigerxyz +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268556 +++$+++ 268557 +++$+++ 2008-10-05 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.223227800E09 +++$+++ Have made necessary amendments. -- +++$+++ :: Have made necessary amendments. --[[User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] ([[User talk:Redtigerxyz|talk]]) 10:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
268559 +++$+++ Redtigerxyz +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268556 +++$+++ 268558 +++$+++ 2008-10-06 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.223323800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the pass, the article was greatly improved by you directly as well as your comments indirectly.  -- +++$+++ ::: Thanks for the pass, the article was greatly improved by you directly as well as your comments indirectly.  --[[User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] ([[User talk:Redtigerxyz|talk]]) 13:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

525357 +++$+++ DRosenbach +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-17 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.182142680E09 +++$+++ Thanx for the reformat...where can I figure out how to do this myself?  I usually just copy and paste an already existing navbox from some unrelated article and change all the linked words...pretty backwards, eh?  Haha...thanx. ''' +++$+++ Thanx for the reformat...where can I figure out how to do this myself?  I usually just copy and paste an already existing navbox from some unrelated article and change all the linked words...pretty backwards, eh?  Haha...thanx. '''[[User:DRosenbach|<span style="color:#006400">DRosenbach</span>]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:DRosenbach|<span style="color:#006400">Talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/DRosenbach|<span style="color:#006400">Contribs</span>]])</sup> 21:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
525358 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525357 +++$+++ 525357 +++$+++ 2007-06-17 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.182142920E09 +++$+++ Happy to help. A good overview is available at [[Template:Navbox generic]]. -- +++$+++ :Happy to help. A good overview is available at [[Template:Navbox generic]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 22:02, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

268560 +++$+++ Kim Bruning +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-05 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.223201100E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]] ([[User talk:Kim Bruning|talk]]) 03:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
268561 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268560 +++$+++ 268560 +++$+++ 2008-10-05 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.223242560E09 +++$+++ Answered on [[WT:MEDRS]] discussion page. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources_(medicine-related_articles)&diff=next&oldid=243174495] &mdash; +++$+++ :Answered on [[WT:MEDRS]] discussion page. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources_(medicine-related_articles)&diff=next&oldid=243174495] &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

530705 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530705 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-11 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.257977880E09 +++$+++ Okay I started the articles for the Centervilles that are in Wisconsin: Trempealeau, St. Croix, and Grant Counties-The Grant County Centerville-the citation had it in that county but not in Lafayette County so I kept it in Grant County-makes things a little easier-there is also a town of [[Centerville, Wisconsin]] but not in those counties +++$+++ Okay I started the articles for the Centervilles that are in Wisconsin: Trempealeau, St. Croix, and Grant Counties-The Grant County Centerville-the citation had it in that county but not in Lafayette County so I kept it in Grant County-makes things a little easier-there is also a town of [[Centerville, Wisconsin]] but not in those counties[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:18, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
530706 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530705 +++$+++ 530705 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.258026240E09 +++$+++ With soooo many places named Centerville, what do you think about having [[Centerville, Wisconsin]] be a disambiguation page with links to all the others? None of these places appear to be way more notable than the rest! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :With soooo many places named Centerville, what do you think about having [[Centerville, Wisconsin]] be a disambiguation page with links to all the others? None of these places appear to be way more notable than the rest! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

268562 +++$+++ the_ed17 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268562 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-05 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.223251320E09 +++$+++ Why did you add {{tl|GAR}} to [[Carrier Air Wing Six]]? It was just promoted yesterday!!! &mdash;'''<font face=\"Monotype Corsiva\">[[User:the_ed17|<font color=\"800000\">the]]_[[User talk:the_ed17|<font color=\"800000\">ed]] +++$+++ Why did you add {{tl|GAR}} to [[Carrier Air Wing Six]]? It was just promoted yesterday!!! &mdash;'''<font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:the_ed17|<font color="800000">the]]_[[User talk:the_ed17|<font color="800000">ed]][[User:the_ed17/Newcomers|<font color="000080">17]]</font></font face>'''&mdash; 17:02, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
268563 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268562 +++$+++ 268562 +++$+++ 2008-10-05 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.223252040E09 +++$+++ I would imagine because the article ought ''not'' to have been promoted, as it is largely a list. GA is not for lists, [[WP:FL]] exists for lists. -- +++$+++ :I would imagine because the article ought ''not'' to have been promoted, as it is largely a list. GA is not for lists, [[WP:FL]] exists for lists. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 17:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
268564 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268562 +++$+++ 268563 +++$+++ 2008-10-05 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.223253180E09 +++$+++ Yes. That is the reason.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Yes. That is the reason.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

530707 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-15 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.258322880E09 +++$+++ Problem isn't too hard; I'm taking care of it.  Had you discovered {{tl|For football player see Ryan Mathews}}?   +++$+++ Problem isn't too hard; I'm taking care of it.  Had you discovered {{tl|For football player see Ryan Mathews}}?  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 14:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
530708 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530707 +++$+++ 530707 +++$+++ 2009-11-15 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.258323120E09 +++$+++ No, the user created a special template for the football player.   +++$+++ :No, the user created a special template for the football player.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 14:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
530709 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530707 +++$+++ 530708 +++$+++ 2009-11-15 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.258323420E09 +++$+++ I'm done; what do you think?   +++$+++ ::I'm done; what do you think?  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 14:17, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
530710 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530707 +++$+++ 530709 +++$+++ 2009-11-15 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.258324140E09 +++$+++ Page moved.  Thanks for the advice; I know nothing of car racing :-)   +++$+++ :::Page moved.  Thanks for the advice; I know nothing of car racing :-)  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 14:29, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

268566 +++$+++ Gary King +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-30 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.222834020E09 +++$+++ I'm still working on it. Should be ready by Thursday at the latest. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ I'm still working on it. Should be ready by Thursday at the latest. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02e">Gary</font>&nbsp;<font color="#02b"><b>King</b></font>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 21:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
268567 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268566 +++$+++ 268566 +++$+++ 2008-09-30 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.222834200E09 +++$+++ That's fine. I was just checking!  &mdash; +++$+++ :That's fine. I was just checking!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
268568 +++$+++ Gary King +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268566 +++$+++ 268567 +++$+++ 2008-10-05 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.223254860E09 +++$+++ [[Talk:AXXo\/GA1]] <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :: [[Talk:AXXo/GA1]] <font face="Verdana">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02e">Gary</font>&nbsp;<font color="#02b"><b>King</b></font>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 18:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
268569 +++$+++ Gary King +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268566 +++$+++ 268568 +++$+++ 2008-10-05 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.223262600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the pass! If you've got time perhaps you are interested in reviewing [[The New York Times]] for GAN? <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::: Thanks for the pass! If you've got time perhaps you are interested in reviewing [[The New York Times]] for GAN? <font face="Verdana">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02e">Gary</font>&nbsp;<font color="#02b"><b>King</b></font>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 20:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
268570 +++$+++ Gary King +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268566 +++$+++ 268569 +++$+++ 2008-10-06 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.223331000E09 +++$+++ Regarding the image that was in the article, [[User_talk:Elcobbola#Is_a_logo_completely_made_up_of_text_copyrightable.3F]]. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::: Regarding the image that was in the article, [[User_talk:Elcobbola#Is_a_logo_completely_made_up_of_text_copyrightable.3F]]. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02e">Gary</font>&nbsp;<font color="#02b"><b>King</b></font>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 15:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
268571 +++$+++ Gary King +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268566 +++$+++ 268570 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.223991720E09 +++$+++ Heya, if you get the chance could you review [[The New York Times]]? It's been up at GAN for over three weeks, and it's my only remaining GAN. It'd appreciate it a lot! Thanks in advance! <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::: Heya, if you get the chance could you review [[The New York Times]]? It's been up at GAN for over three weeks, and it's my only remaining GAN. It'd appreciate it a lot! Thanks in advance! <font face="Verdana">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02e">Gary</font>&nbsp;<font color="#02b"><b>King</b></font>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 06:42, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
268572 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268566 +++$+++ 268571 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.224015480E09 +++$+++ I'll consider it. Having read the NYTimes daily since I was a child and worshipped it, for the last ten years I have lost all respect for it. The [[Jayson Blair]] and [[Judith Miller]]  incidents (among others) finalized it for me.   Now I dislike the the Nytimes, so it is not fun reading an article about it. That's why I avoided your question before, but I will consider it if you get desperate.  Regards,  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::I'll consider it. Having read the NYTimes daily since I was a child and worshipped it, for the last ten years I have lost all respect for it. The [[Jayson Blair]] and [[Judith Miller]]  incidents (among others) finalized it for me.   Now I dislike the the Nytimes, so it is not fun reading an article about it. That's why I avoided your question before, but I will consider it if you get desperate.  Regards,  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

437977 +++$+++ Ragib +++$+++ AA +++$+++ 437977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-04 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.267753440E09 +++$+++ I've semi-protected the page and advised the users to discuss the issue, but apparently it is going nowhere. Since you'll be a completely uninvolved admin, can you take a look and mediate? Thanks. -- +++$+++ I've semi-protected the page and advised the users to discuss the issue, but apparently it is going nowhere. Since you'll be a completely uninvolved admin, can you take a look and mediate? Thanks. --[[User:Ragib|Ragib]] ([[User talk:Ragib|talk]]) 17:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
437978 +++$+++ AA +++$+++ AA +++$+++ 437977 +++$+++ 437977 +++$+++ 2010-03-05 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.267777080E09 +++$+++ Sure. I can give it a try. \u2192  +++$+++ :Sure. I can give it a try. → [[User:AA|AA]] <sup>([[User talk:AA|talk]])</sup> — 00:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
437979 +++$+++ Templeofsolomon +++$+++ AA +++$+++ 437977 +++$+++ 437978 +++$+++ 2010-03-11 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.268365020E09 +++$+++ I've noticed someone gave a very important reply there, with a link to the Daily Star coverage which I've been desperately searching for.-- +++$+++ ::I've noticed someone gave a very important reply there, with a link to the Daily Star coverage which I've been desperately searching for.--[[User:Templeofsolomon|Templeofsolomon]] ([[User talk:Templeofsolomon|talk]]) 19:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
437980 +++$+++ AA +++$+++ AA +++$+++ 437977 +++$+++ 437977 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.268635500E09 +++$+++ Hi Axel, no bother at all and I am happy to explain. The article was tagged under the speedy deletion criteria A7 ([[WP:CSD#A7|No indication of importance]]). This is a Wikipedia policy which says that if the subject does not meet [[WP:N|notability]] guidelines, then it can be deleted. You can review the [[Wikipedia:Notability (web)|specific guidelines for websites]] to understand what is required for a website to be notable. Hope that helps but if you have any further queries, don't hesitate to ask :). Cheers. \u2192  +++$+++ :Hi Axel, no bother at all and I am happy to explain. The article was tagged under the speedy deletion criteria A7 ([[WP:CSD#A7|No indication of importance]]). This is a Wikipedia policy which says that if the subject does not meet [[WP:N|notability]] guidelines, then it can be deleted. You can review the [[Wikipedia:Notability (web)|specific guidelines for websites]] to understand what is required for a website to be notable. Hope that helps but if you have any further queries, don't hesitate to ask :). Cheers. → [[User:AA|AA]] <sup>([[User talk:AA|talk]])</sup> — 23:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

6427 +++$+++ Kober +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-03 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.217762520E09 +++$+++ Hi MChew. Thanks for starting the article. I just want to note that th cathedral is located in the village of Ninotsminda in the [[Kakheti]] region, not the Armenian-populated town in [[Samtskhe-Javakheti]]. Best wishes, -- +++$+++ Hi MChew. Thanks for starting the article. I just want to note that th cathedral is located in the village of Ninotsminda in the [[Kakheti]] region, not the Armenian-populated town in [[Samtskhe-Javakheti]]. Best wishes, --[[User:Kober|Kober]]<sup>[[User talk:Kober|Talk]]</sup> 04:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
6428 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6427 +++$+++ 6427 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.217785680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the correction! Would you be able to add the geo-coordinates for the location to the article? -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the correction! Would you be able to add the geo-coordinates for the location to the article? --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 10:48, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

530717 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530717 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-21 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.258844160E09 +++$+++ Okay- a question how will flagged revisions affect myself with editing. An example: Federal court judge [[Myron L. Gordon]] died-he was also on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. I got an obit put it in as a citation and made the change. There was not that much publicity about his death. Would flagged revisions affected the changes I made if it was in effect? I am wondering and concern. Another item about Wisconsin legislators-someone who is into political science-politics should do the articles about those who are still in the legislature. I am more into the historical aspects of what legislator founded what community or how they contribute to the economy. Many thanks- +++$+++ Okay- a question how will flagged revisions affect myself with editing. An example: Federal court judge [[Myron L. Gordon]] died-he was also on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. I got an obit put it in as a citation and made the change. There was not that much publicity about his death. Would flagged revisions affected the changes I made if it was in effect? I am wondering and concern. Another item about Wisconsin legislators-someone who is into political science-politics should do the articles about those who are still in the legislature. I am more into the historical aspects of what legislator founded what community or how they contribute to the economy. Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:56, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
530718 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530717 +++$+++ 530717 +++$+++ 2009-11-21 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.258861980E09 +++$+++ Good question - I don't know exactly how it will be implemented. I think what's being considered is having a group of trusted people (besides admins) that can review changes. This is why I keep pushing you to let me give you [[WP:ROLLBACK]] - it would give you a better chance of being in the approved list. You've done so much here and probably would succeed in an RFA if you would do minimal diversification. You certainly have the number of edits and the right demeanor. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Good question - I don't know exactly how it will be implemented. I think what's being considered is having a group of trusted people (besides admins) that can review changes. This is why I keep pushing you to let me give you [[WP:ROLLBACK]] - it would give you a better chance of being in the approved list. You've done so much here and probably would succeed in an RFA if you would do minimal diversification. You certainly have the number of edits and the right demeanor. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 19:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
530719 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530717 +++$+++ 530718 +++$+++ 2009-11-21 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.258868160E09 +++$+++ I got the article [[Francis Mary of the Cross Jordan]] started-stub-Many thanks- +++$+++ ::I got the article [[Francis Mary of the Cross Jordan]] started-stub-Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 21:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
530720 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530717 +++$+++ 530719 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.258876800E09 +++$+++ Excellent - many thanks! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Excellent - many thanks! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:00, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

268576 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-10 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.223622660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the review. My doubt is if there is additional work to do. I solved all the problems you mentioned but I thought it was strange not to leave the review on hold with only those problems. Could you tell me the other things? Thanks. +++$+++ Thanks for the review. My doubt is if there is additional work to do. I solved all the problems you mentioned but I thought it was strange not to leave the review on hold with only those problems. Could you tell me the other things? Thanks.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 00:11, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
268577 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268576 +++$+++ 268576 +++$+++ 2008-10-10 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.223623020E09 +++$+++ I will look at your article again tomorrow. (Too tired now!) Maybe the article is fine now. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I will look at your article again tomorrow. (Too tired now!) Maybe the article is fine now. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
268578 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268576 +++$+++ 268577 +++$+++ 2008-10-10 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.223695800E09 +++$+++ So? +++$+++ ::So?[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 20:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
268579 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268576 +++$+++ 268578 +++$+++ 2008-10-10 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.223706780E09 +++$+++ I did some other stuff you mentioned.-- +++$+++ :::I did some other stuff you mentioned.--[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 23:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
268580 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268576 +++$+++ 268579 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.224059220E09 +++$+++ No problem. Thanks a lot for your help. It bothers me not being to copyedit articles since Im still studying English. Regards. +++$+++ ::::No problem. Thanks a lot for your help. It bothers me not being to copyedit articles since Im still studying English. Regards.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 01:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

530721 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530721 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-22 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.258878540E09 +++$+++ ;Thank you for looking at the Judge Gordon article- Fr. Jordan also help founded the Salvatorian Sisters with a nun who was baetified by Pope John Paul II-hopefully I will start that article- +++$+++ ;Thank you for looking at the Judge Gordon article- Fr. Jordan also help founded the Salvatorian Sisters with a nun who was baetified by Pope John Paul II-hopefully I will start that article-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 00:29, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
530722 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530721 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.258879740E09 +++$+++ Sounds good. Also, the only articles which were in the scope of the flagged revisions are [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]]. Since Gordon is dead, the article wouldn't be covered. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Sounds good. Also, the only articles which were in the scope of the flagged revisions are [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]]. Since Gordon is dead, the article wouldn't be covered. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:49, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

530723 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-22 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.258955100E09 +++$+++ Would you please take a look at the [[Reedsburg, Wisconsin]] history section- the section was copied from the city website almost word for word-Thanks- +++$+++ Would you please take a look at the [[Reedsburg, Wisconsin]] history section- the section was copied from the city website almost word for word-Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 21:45, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
530724 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530723 +++$+++ 530723 +++$+++ 2009-11-23 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.259005440E09 +++$+++ Thanks- +++$+++ :Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 11:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

6436 +++$+++ Gdgourou +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-16 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.221623700E09 +++$+++ Perhaps, the best solution is to check where (on which wiki) there's a mistake to resolve the problem. The bot isn't the problem. I will verify myself. -- +++$+++ Perhaps, the best solution is to check where (on which wiki) there's a mistake to resolve the problem. The bot isn't the problem. I will verify myself. --[[User:Gdgourou|GdGourou]]  - '''°o°'''  - [[User Talk:Gdgourou|<small>Talk to me</small>]] 20:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
6437 +++$+++ Gdgourou +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6436 +++$+++ 6436 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.221623880E09 +++$+++ I remove the link to the japanese article on fr and de. The problem should not occurs until someone put the incorrect link again... -- +++$+++ :I remove the link to the japanese article on fr and de. The problem should not occurs until someone put the incorrect link again... --[[User:Gdgourou|GdGourou]]  - '''°o°'''  - [[User Talk:Gdgourou|<small>Talk to me</small>]] 20:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

268581 +++$+++ Skomorokh +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-10 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.223697840E09 +++$+++ Yo Mattisse, the remaining nits have been picked and the article awaits your final judgement. Regards, <font color=\"404040\"> +++$+++ Yo Mattisse, the remaining nits have been picked and the article awaits your final judgement. Regards, <font color="404040">[[User talk:Skomorokh|<font face="Garamond" color="black">the skomorokh</font>]]</font> 21:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
268582 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268581 +++$+++ 268581 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.224058980E09 +++$+++ It's been passed as I'm sure you know by now!  &mdash; +++$+++ : It's been passed as I'm sure you know by now!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

6438 +++$+++ Roger Davies +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-20 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.221956760E09 +++$+++ I do hope you can help but \u2013 if it's not too much trouble \u2013 if you are unable to participate at the moment, would you please let me know on my talk page? otherwise, please sign up [[WP:MHAW07|'''here''']]. Thank you for your time, -- +++$+++ I do hope you can help but – if it's not too much trouble – if you are unable to participate at the moment, would you please let me know on my talk page? otherwise, please sign up [[WP:MHAW07|'''here''']]. Thank you for your time, --[[User:Roger Davies|<font color="maroon">'''R<small>OGER</small>&nbsp;D<small>AVIES'''</small></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 17:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
6439 +++$+++ Roger Davies +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6438 +++$+++ 6438 +++$+++ 2008-09-28 07:53:00 +++$+++ 1.222613580E09 +++$+++ Sorry to trouble you but would it be possible for you to wrap up your [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Assessment\/Wikipedia 0.7\/34|'''worklist''']] today please? If you find yourself unable to do so, it's no problem but I'd appreciate it if you let me know you won't be able to complete on my talk page. Many thanks! -- +++$+++ :Sorry to trouble you but would it be possible for you to wrap up your [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Wikipedia 0.7/34|'''worklist''']] today please? If you find yourself unable to do so, it's no problem but I'd appreciate it if you let me know you won't be able to complete on my talk page. Many thanks! --[[User:Roger Davies|<font color="maroon">'''R<small>OGER</small>&nbsp;D<small>AVIES'''</small></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 07:53, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
6440 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6438 +++$+++ 6439 +++$+++ 2008-09-28 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.222623240E09 +++$+++ I bellieve that my worklist is completed, but if there is still something you need me to do to it, please let me know. -- +++$+++ ::I bellieve that my worklist is completed, but if there is still something you need me to do to it, please let me know. --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 10:34, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

268583 +++$+++ Protonk +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-15 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.224055620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your review.  An independent look at this article was exactly what it needed.  Thanks for all your suggestion and criticism there.  +++$+++ Thanks for your review.  An independent look at this article was exactly what it needed.  Thanks for all your suggestion and criticism there. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 00:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
268584 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268583 +++$+++ 268583 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.224055920E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. It was a pleasure! &mdash; +++$+++ :You are very welcome. It was a pleasure! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

530728 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-27 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.259326260E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, I should be able to get to [[Alan Kulwicki]] within the next few days. Do you mind if instead of a full review I do a direct copyedit to the article and leave some questions on the talk page? Most of my points during reviews tend to be grammatical ones, and it can get a touch laborious to do that in bullet-point form. Naturally, you can revert anything you disagree with, and I'll have a look at the sources as well (although after [[List of Daytona 500 pole position winners]] you have some practice with this). <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ Just to let you know, I should be able to get to [[Alan Kulwicki]] within the next few days. Do you mind if instead of a full review I do a direct copyedit to the article and leave some questions on the talk page? Most of my points during reviews tend to be grammatical ones, and it can get a touch laborious to do that in bullet-point form. Naturally, you can revert anything you disagree with, and I'll have a look at the sources as well (although after [[List of Daytona 500 pole position winners]] you have some practice with this). <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 04:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
530729 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530728 +++$+++ 530728 +++$+++ 2009-11-27 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.259357940E09 +++$+++ Of course you can! I don't remember asking, but I'm always open to a review! Kulwicki is a failed Featured Article Candidate and I just looked at the references which appear to be impeccable. Please ask if you don't understand the significance of any source, like ''Stock Car Racing'' means [[Stock Car Racing magazine]]. I learned about using highly reliable sources from that experience; the quality references used in the list came as a result. I'd love to see a motorsport but non-NASCAR fan to give AK a clean scrubbing in any\/all way, shape, or form you want. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Of course you can! I don't remember asking, but I'm always open to a review! Kulwicki is a failed Featured Article Candidate and I just looked at the references which appear to be impeccable. Please ask if you don't understand the significance of any source, like ''Stock Car Racing'' means [[Stock Car Racing magazine]]. I learned about using highly reliable sources from that experience; the quality references used in the list came as a result. I'd love to see a motorsport but non-NASCAR fan to give AK a clean scrubbing in any/all way, shape, or form you want. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:39, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
530730 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530728 +++$+++ 530729 +++$+++ 2009-12-09 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.260353940E09 +++$+++ Well, you asked a little while ago and I can barely remember. I'll start working my way through today. <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ ::Well, you asked a little while ago and I can barely remember. I'll start working my way through today. <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 02:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

268585 +++$+++ Taprobanus +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-15 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.224062520E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" |  I hearby award you the Barnstar of Diligence for your tireless copy editing of [[Sri Lankan Tamil Nationalism]] article.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" |  I hearby award you the Barnstar of Diligence for your tireless copy editing of [[Sri Lankan Tamil Nationalism]] article. [[User:Taprobanus|Taprobanus]] ([[User talk:Taprobanus|talk]]) 02:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
268586 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268585 +++$+++ 268585 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.224062940E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I learned a lot from the article. &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you! I learned a lot from the article. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:29, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

268587 +++$+++ JayHenry +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268587 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-07 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.223372940E09 +++$+++ Mattisse--thanks much for the helpful review and edits at [[Panic of 1907]].  I need to be ''a lot'' more careful with my commas.  I'm glad you enjoyed the article and am very happy with how it's turned out! -- +++$+++ Mattisse--thanks much for the helpful review and edits at [[Panic of 1907]].  I need to be ''a lot'' more careful with my commas.  I'm glad you enjoyed the article and am very happy with how it's turned out! --[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] ([[User talk:JayHenry|talk]]) 02:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
268588 +++$+++ JayHenry +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268587 +++$+++ 268587 +++$+++ 2008-10-17 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.224240540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note of encouragement, and thanks also for your help reviewing and copy-editing [[Panic of 1907]]!  It really turned out great, I think!  I probably am being a bit pessimistic...  I'll probably try to tackle [[LTCM]] at some point soon, even though it will be challenging.  So many articles on Wikipedia... so little time! -- +++$+++ : Thanks for the note of encouragement, and thanks also for your help reviewing and copy-editing [[Panic of 1907]]!  It really turned out great, I think!  I probably am being a bit pessimistic...  I'll probably try to tackle [[LTCM]] at some point soon, even though it will be challenging.  So many articles on Wikipedia... so little time! --[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] ([[User talk:JayHenry|talk]]) 03:49, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

263218 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-17 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.119043260E09 +++$+++ I think a visting lecturer isn't classified as a TA, but are fully qualified teachers themselves.  Could you clarify this.  -- +++$+++ I think a visting lecturer isn't classified as a TA, but are fully qualified teachers themselves.  Could you clarify this.  --[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] 14:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
263219 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263218 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-06-17 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.119048300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the response, I suppose my difference in comprehension is due to regional and subject difference, I have just never encountered a TA qualified with a PhD - but now understand that they exist, hence Visitng Lecturer. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the response, I suppose my difference in comprehension is due to regional and subject difference, I have just never encountered a TA qualified with a PhD - but now understand that they exist, hence Visitng Lecturer. --[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] 15:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

6447 +++$+++ Myst +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6447 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-06 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.223345400E09 +++$+++ Just check interwiki on other wiki ! It's '''JUST A BOT''' ! HUMAN make error, if you have problem with diff, just DO SOMETHING ! THANKS !  +++$+++ Just check interwiki on other wiki ! It's '''JUST A BOT''' ! HUMAN make error, if you have problem with diff, just DO SOMETHING ! THANKS ! [[User:Myst|Myst]] ([[User talk:Myst|talk]]) 19:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
6448 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6447 +++$+++ 6447 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.223382060E09 +++$+++ Have now done so. Actually, I did not even think about checking the other interwiki. Thanks -- +++$+++ : Have now done so. Actually, I did not even think about checking the other interwiki. Thanks --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 05:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

268592 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-18 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.224394320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your copy-editing on [[LaRouche criminal trials]]. You have a good eye for it. [[Special:Contributions\/Will_Beback| \xb7:\xb7 ]] +++$+++ Thanks for your copy-editing on [[LaRouche criminal trials]]. You have a good eye for it. [[Special:Contributions/Will_Beback| ·:· ]][[User:Will Beback|Will Beback]]  [[User talk:Will Beback|·:·]] 22:32, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
268593 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268592 +++$+++ 268592 +++$+++ 2008-10-18 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.224394620E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. It is hard to follow all the complications in the story, so I was hoping I wasn't doing more harm than good! Glad to hear you approve.  &mdash; +++$+++ :You're welcome. It is hard to follow all the complications in the story, so I was hoping I wasn't doing more harm than good! Glad to hear you approve.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

481672 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-01 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.138798560E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I'm trying to use ifd2 in accordance with the instructions at [[WP:IFD]] and it doesn't appear to be working.  I notice you made a modification to that template just yesterday.  Is the usage of that template different now?  Thanks.  \u2014 +++$+++ Hi.  I'm trying to use ifd2 in accordance with the instructions at [[WP:IFD]] and it doesn't appear to be working.  I notice you made a modification to that template just yesterday.  Is the usage of that template different now?  Thanks.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 04:56, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
481673 +++$+++ Dbenbenn +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481672 +++$+++ 481672 +++$+++ 2006-02-01 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.138843260E09 +++$+++ Whoops, I broke it!  Fixed now.   +++$+++ : Whoops, I broke it!  Fixed now.  [[User:Dbenbenn|dbenbenn]] | [[User talk:Dbenbenn|talk]] 17:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

268594 +++$+++ a +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268594 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-19 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.224448020E09 +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse! I wanted to submit an article for GA, but I got it peer reviewed. Here's how it was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Pride_%26_Joy_(comics)&diff=246201890&oldid=246183188 BEFORE], and here's how it is [[Pride & Joy (comics)|AFTER]]. Is it better? I'd like your opinion. Thanks a lot!  +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse! I wanted to submit an article for GA, but I got it peer reviewed. Here's how it was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pride_%26_Joy_(comics)&diff=246201890&oldid=246183188 BEFORE], and here's how it is [[Pride & Joy (comics)|AFTER]]. Is it better? I'd like your opinion. Thanks a lot! [[User:A|<font color="cornflowerblue">A]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:A|<font color="cornflowerblue">talk</font>]]</sub> 13:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
268595 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268594 +++$+++ 268594 +++$+++ 2008-10-19 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.224475680E09 +++$+++ It is better. I'll add some comments to the [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Pride & Joy (comics)\/archive1]]. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :It is better. I'll add some comments to the [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Pride & Joy (comics)/archive1]]. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:08, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
268596 +++$+++ a +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268594 +++$+++ 268595 +++$+++ 2008-10-19 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.224482640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for all your help and input!  +++$+++ ::Thanks for all your help and input! [[User:A|<font color="cornflowerblue">A]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:A|<font color="cornflowerblue">talk</font>]]</sub> 23:04, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

506499 +++$+++ Dcheagle +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-01 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.296615480E09 +++$+++ Thank you for removing vandalism from my talk page-- +++$+++ Thank you for removing vandalism from my talk page--[[User:Dcheagle|<font face="Goudy Stout" color="Black">'''Steam'''</font>]][[User talk:Dcheagle|<font face="Goudy Stout" color="FireBrick">'''Iron'''</font>]] 18:58, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
506500 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506499 +++$+++ 506499 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.296615540E09 +++$+++ Your welcome. -- +++$+++ :Your welcome. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 18:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

268597 +++$+++ Gary King +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-20 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.224487260E09 +++$+++ [[The New York Times]] was reviewed (and passed at the same time) a few days ago, so don't worry about that :) As for GAN, I've got two short ones there right now ([[Half-Life 2: Lost Coast]] and [[Half-Life 2: Survivor]]), if you want something to review ;) <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ [[The New York Times]] was reviewed (and passed at the same time) a few days ago, so don't worry about that :) As for GAN, I've got two short ones there right now ([[Half-Life 2: Lost Coast]] and [[Half-Life 2: Survivor]]), if you want something to review ;) <font face="Verdana">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02e">Gary</font>&nbsp;<font color="#02b"><b>King</b></font>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 00:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
268598 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268597 +++$+++ 268597 +++$+++ 2008-10-20 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.224495840E09 +++$+++ Yes, I saw that. Congratulations!  &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes, I saw that. Congratulations!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

268599 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-19 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.224407280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing it! I'm going to do some cleaning up like you suggested tomorrow. Thanks again! :)  +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing it! I'm going to do some cleaning up like you suggested tomorrow. Thanks again! :) [[User:Andrzejbanas|Andrzejbanas]] ([[User talk:Andrzejbanas|talk]]) 02:08, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
268600 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268599 +++$+++ 268599 +++$+++ 2008-10-20 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.224545640E09 +++$+++ I updated the information need on Eyes Without a Face as you requested. Thanks for taking the time to review the article, and feel free to tell me to make any more additions to it!  +++$+++ :I updated the information need on Eyes Without a Face as you requested. Thanks for taking the time to review the article, and feel free to tell me to make any more additions to it! [[User:Andrzejbanas|Andrzejbanas]] ([[User talk:Andrzejbanas|talk]]) 16:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
268601 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268599 +++$+++ 268600 +++$+++ 2008-10-21 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.224636420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for all the help! My First GA! :)  +++$+++ ::Thanks for all the help! My First GA! :) [[User:Andrzejbanas|Andrzejbanas]] ([[User talk:Andrzejbanas|talk]]) 17:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
268602 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268599 +++$+++ 268601 +++$+++ 2008-10-21 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.224636600E09 +++$+++ It was a pleasure. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::It was a pleasure. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:50, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

530744 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530744 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-12 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.260675900E09 +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil- I to revert edits on 2 articles because of possible Conflict of Interest and original research: #[[Lucian Pulvermacher]]- he claimed to be Pope Pius XIII and died quite recently- it sounds like someone from his group made the edits no citations in fact citations were taken out. I asked the editor involved not to make the changes.  #[[Alex Jordan, Jr.]] of [[House on the Rock]] same reason some from organizations made the changes original research\/no citation-both have Wisconsin connections. Hope you are doing well thanks- +++$+++ Hi Royalbroil- I to revert edits on 2 articles because of possible Conflict of Interest and original research: #[[Lucian Pulvermacher]]- he claimed to be Pope Pius XIII and died quite recently- it sounds like someone from his group made the edits no citations in fact citations were taken out. I asked the editor involved not to make the changes.  #[[Alex Jordan, Jr.]] of [[House on the Rock]] same reason some from organizations made the changes original research/no citation-both have Wisconsin connections. Hope you are doing well thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 19:45, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
530745 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530744 +++$+++ 530744 +++$+++ 2009-12-12 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.260685740E09 +++$+++ No comment about the first change, but the COI person in the second case was effectively challenging the last unsourced statement - so I agreed and challenged it. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :No comment about the first change, but the COI person in the second case was effectively challenging the last unsourced statement - so I agreed and challenged it. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 22:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
530746 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530744 +++$+++ 530744 +++$+++ 2009-12-12 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.260686640E09 +++$+++ I revert my edit back to TrueCatholic in the first article and decided to let someone else worry about it-My thanks for your help- +++$+++ :I revert my edit back to TrueCatholic in the first article and decided to let someone else worry about it-My thanks for your help-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 22:44, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

530747 +++$+++ Cs-wolves +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-14 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.260789060E09 +++$+++ The fact that there is no Robert Richardson, Sr. article is swaying me towards the (NASCAR) option. However, if someone were to create the \", Sr.\" article, that'd change my opinion. But for the moment, go with (NASCAR). Yeah. :) <font face=\"Zemestro\"> +++$+++ The fact that there is no Robert Richardson, Sr. article is swaying me towards the (NASCAR) option. However, if someone were to create the ", Sr." article, that'd change my opinion. But for the moment, go with (NASCAR). Yeah. :) <font face="Zemestro">[[User:Cs-wolves|<span style="color:black;background:gold">Cs-wolves</span>]][[User talk:Cs-wolves|<span style="color:red;background:white">(talk)</span>]]</font> 03:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
530748 +++$+++ Cs-wolves +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530747 +++$+++ 530747 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.260790020E09 +++$+++ Ah excellent. Oh, no worries. I think it was the IP that edited the page before me. <font face=\"Zemestro\"> +++$+++ :Ah excellent. Oh, no worries. I think it was the IP that edited the page before me. <font face="Zemestro">[[User:Cs-wolves|<span style="color:black;background:gold">Cs-wolves</span>]][[User talk:Cs-wolves|<span style="color:red;background:white">(talk)</span>]]</font> 03:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

268604 +++$+++ the_ed17 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-21 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.224651600E09 +++$+++ [[Talk:Carrier Air Wing Six\/GA2]]. :) &mdash;<font face=\"Viner Hand ITC\" color=\"2F4F4F\"><small>'''Ed [[User:the_ed17\/Newcomers|<font color=\"00008B\">1''7'']]  +++$+++ [[Talk:Carrier Air Wing Six/GA2]]. :) &mdash;<font face="Viner Hand ITC" color="2F4F4F"><small>'''Ed [[User:the_ed17/Newcomers|<font color="00008B">1''7'']] [[User:the_ed17|<font color="2F4F4F">for President]]  <sub>''[[User talk:the_ed17#VOTE FOR ED|<font color="2F4F4F">Vote for Ed]]''</small></sub></font></font face color>''' 22:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
268605 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268604 +++$+++ 268604 +++$+++ 2008-10-21 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.224652800E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry. I am confused over what is happening. I should go ahead and fail the article for GAR. I guess I dropped the ball. I wanted to suggest  that the editor of the article  might get more help at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history]] and [[Wikipedia:Featured_lists#Military_and_military_history|Featured Lists - Military and military history]] for help\/advice\/review of your article. It really does not meet the GA criteria, in my opinion. Is that what you mean? That I forgot to complete the failing? I will go ahead and do it now. Thanks, &mdash; +++$+++ :I'm sorry. I am confused over what is happening. I should go ahead and fail the article for GAR. I guess I dropped the ball. I wanted to suggest  that the editor of the article  might get more help at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history]] and [[Wikipedia:Featured_lists#Military_and_military_history|Featured Lists - Military and military history]] for help/advice/review of your article. It really does not meet the GA criteria, in my opinion. Is that what you mean? That I forgot to complete the failing? I will go ahead and do it now. Thanks, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

530749 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-15 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.260868800E09 +++$+++ Some editor requested a move to rename the town of [[Dexter, Wisconsin]]---> to Dexterville in Wood County. I and another editor opposed it. I did start an article about the unincorporated community of [[Dexterville, Wisconsin]], which is in the town of Dexter.Please the talk page for Dexter, Wisconsin. I hope this helps-Thanks- +++$+++ Some editor requested a move to rename the town of [[Dexter, Wisconsin]]---> to Dexterville in Wood County. I and another editor opposed it. I did start an article about the unincorporated community of [[Dexterville, Wisconsin]], which is in the town of Dexter.Please the talk page for Dexter, Wisconsin. I hope this helps-Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 01:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
530750 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530749 +++$+++ 530749 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.261352880E09 +++$+++ I hope you are doing well. Would you please close the discussion about the proposed move involving [[Dexter, Wisconsin]] either today or tomorrow. There has been no more comments and the original editor who proposed this has not said anything more-Thanks- +++$+++ :I hope you are doing well. Would you please close the discussion about the proposed move involving [[Dexter, Wisconsin]] either today or tomorrow. There has been no more comments and the original editor who proposed this has not said anything more-Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 15:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
530751 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530749 +++$+++ 530750 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.261368840E09 +++$+++ Per [[WP:RMCI]], neither Royalbroil or I should close the discussion, unfortunately. -- +++$+++ ::Per [[WP:RMCI]], neither Royalbroil or I should close the discussion, unfortunately. --[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 20:14, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

268606 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268606 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-22 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.224664860E09 +++$+++ Matisse - I just saw your post on the review page, and I will respond to it in just a moment.  Before you take this article to GAR, would you please consider giving the lead editor and myself time to read your comments, discuss them, and perhaps act on them?  After reading your comments, I find that I agree with several of your points, and I will post a reply to that effect on the page in just a minute. However, I believe that this can probably be fixed without going to GAR, if you will be patient for a little while.  The lead editor and myself are both active editors, so I promise it won't be too long!  If you wish to informally bring in other editors to comment, I would welcome that, but I ask you to please hold off on a formal process. Thanks in advance.  +++$+++ Matisse - I just saw your post on the review page, and I will respond to it in just a moment.  Before you take this article to GAR, would you please consider giving the lead editor and myself time to read your comments, discuss them, and perhaps act on them?  After reading your comments, I find that I agree with several of your points, and I will post a reply to that effect on the page in just a minute. However, I believe that this can probably be fixed without going to GAR, if you will be patient for a little while.  The lead editor and myself are both active editors, so I promise it won't be too long!  If you wish to informally bring in other editors to comment, I would welcome that, but I ask you to please hold off on a formal process. Thanks in advance. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer|talk]]) 01:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268607 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268606 +++$+++ 268606 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.224665400E09 +++$+++ Well, of course I will do that. But do you know how long this article has been at GA and how many very good editors got their brain tangled up by it and finally refused to pass it? This is mind numbing. I have tried to be understanding regarding the editor, and at least he\/she has finally admitted it is [[pseudoscience]] after a year. In my opinion, it is unethical and very misleading to mix the pseudoscience with legitimate medical\/psychological information the way it has been done in this article.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Well, of course I will do that. But do you know how long this article has been at GA and how many very good editors got their brain tangled up by it and finally refused to pass it? This is mind numbing. I have tried to be understanding regarding the editor, and at least he/she has finally admitted it is [[pseudoscience]] after a year. In my opinion, it is unethical and very misleading to mix the pseudoscience with legitimate medical/psychological information the way it has been done in this article.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268608 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268606 +++$+++ 268607 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.224665640E09 +++$+++ Thank you for being patient.  I've just posted my replies to your comments on the talk page, as well as a comment asking Fainite to reply ASAP.  Just as an FYI, I'm going to be going to bed in a few minutes, so I won't respond to any comments that are made. I honestly thought the article was informative, and although a bit technical, not horribly hard to read, but I understand that this is after the work of several reviewers before myself.  Overall, as far as prose and referencing goes, this article seems to be fairly good, but I can definitely see your points (now that they have been pointed out to me :P) regarding content.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for being patient.  I've just posted my replies to your comments on the talk page, as well as a comment asking Fainite to reply ASAP.  Just as an FYI, I'm going to be going to bed in a few minutes, so I won't respond to any comments that are made. I honestly thought the article was informative, and although a bit technical, not horribly hard to read, but I understand that this is after the work of several reviewers before myself.  Overall, as far as prose and referencing goes, this article seems to be fairly good, but I can definitely see your points (now that they have been pointed out to me :P) regarding content. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer|talk]]) 01:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268609 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268606 +++$+++ 268608 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.224666000E09 +++$+++ O.K. Tomorrow. Thanks,  &mdash; +++$+++ :::O.K. Tomorrow. Thanks,  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:00, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

394293 +++$+++ CycloneGU +++$+++ Davewild +++$+++ 394293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-22 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.282512060E09 +++$+++ I have been watching the vote page, but I did not even see your proposal.  What were you suggesting?   +++$+++ I have been watching the vote page, but I did not even see your proposal.  What were you suggesting?  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 14:21, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
394294 +++$+++ Davewild +++$+++ Davewild +++$+++ 394293 +++$+++ 394293 +++$+++ 2010-08-23 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.282572720E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Pending_changes\/Straw_poll&diff=prev&oldid=380291461 This difference] is what I suggested as an option but it was removed.  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Pending_changes/Straw_poll&diff=prev&oldid=380291461 This difference] is what I suggested as an option but it was removed. [[User:Davewild|Davewild]] ([[User talk:Davewild#top|talk]]) 07:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

530752 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530752 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-15 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.260884100E09 +++$+++ Nice pictures for the new [[Charlesburg, Wisconsin]] article!-- +++$+++ Nice pictures for the new [[Charlesburg, Wisconsin]] article!--[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 05:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
530753 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530752 +++$+++ 530752 +++$+++ 2009-12-15 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.260884760E09 +++$+++ I was hoping to create that article myself. You can see I planned it years ago (look at the date of the images). Would you please skip adding articles to the unincorporated communities in Fond du Lac and Calumet Counties? I have pictures of many of them. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I was hoping to create that article myself. You can see I planned it years ago (look at the date of the images). Would you please skip adding articles to the unincorporated communities in Fond du Lac and Calumet Counties? I have pictures of many of them. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
530754 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530752 +++$+++ 530753 +++$+++ 2009-12-15 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.260891000E09 +++$+++ Sure, no problem.  I only created it after it redlinked from the [[Aloysius Leitner]] article that I was trying to improve.-- +++$+++ ::Sure, no problem.  I only created it after it redlinked from the [[Aloysius Leitner]] article that I was trying to improve.--[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 07:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

44768 +++$+++ Erikeltic +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44768 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.312364880E09 +++$+++ There is currently a discussion taking place on [[Sondra Locke]] that could have some bearing on the discussions we've had in [[Michelle Thomas]].  The topic is using a cited age to obtain a birth year by subtraction.  Sounds familiar, does it not?  If you'd like to contribute, I invite you to do so now.  Thanks.   +++$+++ There is currently a discussion taking place on [[Sondra Locke]] that could have some bearing on the discussions we've had in [[Michelle Thomas]].  The topic is using a cited age to obtain a birth year by subtraction.  Sounds familiar, does it not?  If you'd like to contribute, I invite you to do so now.  Thanks.  [[User:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#E00C0C"><B>Erikeltic</B>]]</span> <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#E00C0C">Talk]]</span>)</span></sup> 02:48, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
44769 +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ SummerPhD +++$+++ 44768 +++$+++ 44768 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.312371000E09 +++$+++ I have been removing all unsourced additions to that list. If you have [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], please [[WP:CITE|cite]] them. Thanks. -  +++$+++ :I have been removing all unsourced additions to that list. If you have [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], please [[WP:CITE|cite]] them. Thanks. - [[User:SummerPhD|<span style="color:#D70270;background-color:white;">Sum</span><span style="color:#734F96;background-color:white;">mer</span><span style="color:#0038A8;background-color:white;">PhD</span>]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD|talk]]) 04:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

268610 +++$+++ Derek.cashman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268610 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-22 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.224667800E09 +++$+++ Please do not add delisted articles (with strikethroughs) to the recent GAs list. The list is for '''new GAs ONLY'''; it is inappropriate and misleading to add delisted GAs to the list.  +++$+++ Please do not add delisted articles (with strikethroughs) to the recent GAs list. The list is for '''new GAs ONLY'''; it is inappropriate and misleading to add delisted GAs to the list. [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 02:30, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268611 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268610 +++$+++ 268610 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.224668220E09 +++$+++ Sorry. I didn't realize the practice had changed. I won't do it again.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Sorry. I didn't realize the practice had changed. I won't do it again.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268612 +++$+++ Derek.cashman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268610 +++$+++ 268611 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.224669240E09 +++$+++ As far as I know, it never was an established practice to add delisted GAs to that list in the first place. I'm not sure who \"started\" it.  +++$+++ ::As far as I know, it never was an established practice to add delisted GAs to that list in the first place. I'm not sure who "started" it. [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 02:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

530755 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530755 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-15 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.260931680E09 +++$+++ Hi! if you are in the Green Bay-Door County area-you may want to take photos of the [[Shrine of Our Lady of Good Help]]. It is one of the important Roman Catholic shrines in Wisconsin-Bishop Ricken just said mass there-THanks- +++$+++ Hi! if you are in the Green Bay-Door County area-you may want to take photos of the [[Shrine of Our Lady of Good Help]]. It is one of the important Roman Catholic shrines in Wisconsin-Bishop Ricken just said mass there-THanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 18:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
530756 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530755 +++$+++ 530755 +++$+++ 2009-12-16 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.260954240E09 +++$+++ Oh my - looks interesting! I doubt that I'd go that way until spring or summer. Maybe on a trip to door county or going to races at nearby Luxemburg Speedway in April\/May. It's nice to have something interesting like that to visit while going or coming back from Door County. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Oh my - looks interesting! I doubt that I'd go that way until spring or summer. Maybe on a trip to door county or going to races at nearby Luxemburg Speedway in April/May. It's nice to have something interesting like that to visit while going or coming back from Door County. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:04, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
530757 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530755 +++$+++ 530755 +++$+++ 2009-12-16 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.261003200E09 +++$+++ Many thanks-unlike Holy Hill, the Guadalupe Shrine or St Josephat Basilica, the Our Lady of Good Help is not that well known. It could very well be declare a minor basilica. Bishop Ricken did say mass there and created a diocesan commission to look into whether Adele Brice saw thw Blessed Virgin Mary in the 19th Century. Hope you are doing okay-I started an article about the Roman Catholic Brazilian Archbishop Ribeiro. He died and his name was at Deaths in 2009. Iwanted to get done or else it will be taken off in a month-Hope you are well- +++$+++ :Many thanks-unlike Holy Hill, the Guadalupe Shrine or St Josephat Basilica, the Our Lady of Good Help is not that well known. It could very well be declare a minor basilica. Bishop Ricken did say mass there and created a diocesan commission to look into whether Adele Brice saw thw Blessed Virgin Mary in the 19th Century. Hope you are doing okay-I started an article about the Roman Catholic Brazilian Archbishop Ribeiro. He died and his name was at Deaths in 2009. Iwanted to get done or else it will be taken off in a month-Hope you are well-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

268613 +++$+++ Derek.cashman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268613 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-22 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.224669180E09 +++$+++ It might be best if you reviewed some articles at [[WP:GAR]] for awhile to get the hang of the delisting criteria and process instead of boldly delisting,...  +++$+++ It might be best if you reviewed some articles at [[WP:GAR]] for awhile to get the hang of the delisting criteria and process instead of boldly delisting,... [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 02:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268614 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268613 +++$+++ 268613 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.224670200E09 +++$+++ I couldn't understand the directions on the GAR page. I did not realize it was a GAR in the beginning. I am not sure how that slipped in as I thought it was a GA and it was completed weeks ago. There was a understanding with the editor, and he posted to me today that I had not closed the GA review.   I had fill out a review page which is linked in the delisting template. I can restore it to the talk page, if that is what you mean. I will do that.  I simply cannot understand the template directions and will never voluntarily do an independent GAR. Thanks, &mdash; +++$+++ :I couldn't understand the directions on the GAR page. I did not realize it was a GAR in the beginning. I am not sure how that slipped in as I thought it was a GA and it was completed weeks ago. There was a understanding with the editor, and he posted to me today that I had not closed the GA review.   I had fill out a review page which is linked in the delisting template. I can restore it to the talk page, if that is what you mean. I will do that.  I simply cannot understand the template directions and will never voluntarily do an independent GAR. Thanks, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268615 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268613 +++$+++ 268614 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.224670440E09 +++$+++ P.S. I am quite fine with just doing GA reviews as the process is clear there. As I said, I have no wish to get involved with GAR where the process is not clear to me -- and I have read the directions over and over. Regards,  &mdash; +++$+++ :: P.S. I am quite fine with just doing GA reviews as the process is clear there. As I said, I have no wish to get involved with GAR where the process is not clear to me -- and I have read the directions over and over. Regards,  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268616 +++$+++ Derek.cashman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268613 +++$+++ 268615 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.224713160E09 +++$+++ I've removed my delisting comments and linked the articlehistory template to yours. Thanks for clarifying that.  +++$+++ :::I've removed my delisting comments and linked the articlehistory template to yours. Thanks for clarifying that. [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 15:06, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

6471 +++$+++ WoodElf +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-04 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.228419480E09 +++$+++ However, it seems you recently made an incorrect edit to the article [[Princess Tomohito of Mikasa]]: It seems you've confused Nobuko, Princess of Mikasa (b. 1955), with Yuriko, Princess Mikasa (b. 1923), who can be found at [[Princess Mikasa]]. --<tt> +++$+++ However, it seems you recently made an incorrect edit to the article [[Princess Tomohito of Mikasa]]: It seems you've confused Nobuko, Princess of Mikasa (b. 1955), with Yuriko, Princess Mikasa (b. 1923), who can be found at [[Princess Mikasa]]. --<tt>[[User:WoodElf|Wood]][[User talk:WoodElf|''elf'']]</tt> 11:38, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
6472 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6471 +++$+++ 6471 +++$+++ 2008-12-04 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.228434420E09 +++$+++ Thanks! You are precisely correct. I edited the page offline, and returned to the wrong location. Thanks for catching the error! -- +++$+++ : Thanks! You are precisely correct. I edited the page offline, and returned to the wrong location. Thanks for catching the error! --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 15:47, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

268617 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-22 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.224711360E09 +++$+++ Individual GARs are a minefield, best to stay well clear. ;-) Dr Cash is not entirely correct in his advice to you above though. Wikiproject class ratings are nothing at all to do with GA ratings. Wikiprojects are at liberty to use whatever ratings they like, including GA, but that has nothing to do with the GA process. So when you delist an article you ought ''not'' to alter any wikiproject ratings. That's the responsibility of the projects themselves. -- +++$+++ Individual GARs are a minefield, best to stay well clear. ;-) Dr Cash is not entirely correct in his advice to you above though. Wikiproject class ratings are nothing at all to do with GA ratings. Wikiprojects are at liberty to use whatever ratings they like, including GA, but that has nothing to do with the GA process. So when you delist an article you ought ''not'' to alter any wikiproject ratings. That's the responsibility of the projects themselves. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 14:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268618 +++$+++ Derek.cashman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268617 +++$+++ 268617 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.224713160E09 +++$+++ This is incorrect. The 'GA' class rating for wikiprojects should be used similar to the 'FA' class rating for wikiprojects; that is, for FA and GA articles only. If a GA is delisted, it should be demoted back to B, in the same way that if an FA is delisted, it is likewise demoted back to B.  +++$+++ :This is incorrect. The 'GA' class rating for wikiprojects should be used similar to the 'FA' class rating for wikiprojects; that is, for FA and GA articles only. If a GA is delisted, it should be demoted back to B, in the same way that if an FA is delisted, it is likewise demoted back to B. [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 15:06, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

394295 +++$+++ Jeepday +++$+++ Davewild +++$+++ 394295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-03 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.283580000E09 +++$+++ I am not sure why [[:Template:Zimbabwean parliamentary election, 1995]] is not just in the article [[Zimbabwean parliamentary election, 1995]] as a straight table. Is there some chance the template might be used on another article?  +++$+++ I am not sure why [[:Template:Zimbabwean parliamentary election, 1995]] is not just in the article [[Zimbabwean parliamentary election, 1995]] as a straight table. Is there some chance the template might be used on another article? [[User:Jeepday|Jeepday]] <small>([[User talk:Jeepday|talk]])</small> 23:00, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
394296 +++$+++ Davewild +++$+++ Davewild +++$+++ 394295 +++$+++ 394295 +++$+++ 2010-09-04 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.283612460E09 +++$+++ The general practice is that many election results are put in a template - see the subcategories of [[:Category:Election and referendum result templates]] for the many hundreds of such examples - so that it makes the article easier to edit without having all [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Zimbabwean_parliamentary_election,_1995&action=edit this wikitext] in the middle of an article. It makes no difference to the reader but makes editing the articles easier and there is still a link on the article so the template can be easily edited.  +++$+++ :The general practice is that many election results are put in a template - see the subcategories of [[:Category:Election and referendum result templates]] for the many hundreds of such examples - so that it makes the article easier to edit without having all [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Zimbabwean_parliamentary_election,_1995&action=edit this wikitext] in the middle of an article. It makes no difference to the reader but makes editing the articles easier and there is still a link on the article so the template can be easily edited. [[User:Davewild|Davewild]] ([[User talk:Davewild#top|talk]]) 08:01, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
394297 +++$+++ Davewild +++$+++ Davewild +++$+++ 394295 +++$+++ 394295 +++$+++ 2010-09-04 10:33:00 +++$+++ 1.283621580E09 +++$+++ Also see [[Elections in 2006]] or [[Elections in 2005]] for instance. When such a list\/article if created for 1995 this template would be used on that article.  +++$+++ :Also see [[Elections in 2006]] or [[Elections in 2005]] for instance. When such a list/article if created for 1995 this template would be used on that article. [[User:Davewild|Davewild]] ([[User talk:Davewild#top|talk]]) 10:33, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
394298 +++$+++ Jeepday +++$+++ Davewild +++$+++ 394295 +++$+++ 394297 +++$+++ 2010-09-04 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.283625000E09 +++$+++ Ok thanks, that makes sense.  +++$+++ :: Ok thanks, that makes sense. [[User:Jeepday|Jeepday]] <small>([[User talk:Jeepday|talk]])</small> 11:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

6476 +++$+++ The Land +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6476 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-26 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.233035340E09 +++$+++ Could you let me know the source and author of [[:File:IJN Satsuma 2.jpg]], as it's used in [[Dreadnought]], which is a current Featured Article candidate, and we need to double-check the suitability of all images used. Many thanks,  +++$+++ Could you let me know the source and author of [[:File:IJN Satsuma 2.jpg]], as it's used in [[Dreadnought]], which is a current Featured Article candidate, and we need to double-check the suitability of all images used. Many thanks, [[User:The Land|The Land]] ([[User talk:The Land|talk]]) 21:49, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
6477 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6476 +++$+++ 6476 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.232928120E09 +++$+++ The photo is a scan from a collection of old military postcards owned by a friend. As Satsuma was scrapped in 1923, the postcard dates from before this time, perhaps around 1910-1915. However, scans of similar postcards can be found at [http:\/\/www.geocities.jp\/kigiken\/shipping2ww.html] among other sites. -- +++$+++ : The photo is a scan from a collection of old military postcards owned by a friend. As Satsuma was scrapped in 1923, the postcard dates from before this time, perhaps around 1910-1915. However, scans of similar postcards can be found at [http://www.geocities.jp/kigiken/shipping2ww.html] among other sites. --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
6478 +++$+++ The Land +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6476 +++$+++ 6477 +++$+++ 2009-01-27 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.233086580E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Do you happen to know if the postcard was origianlly published in Japan?  +++$+++ ::Thanks. Do you happen to know if the postcard was origianlly published in Japan? [[User:The Land|The Land]] ([[User talk:The Land|talk]]) 12:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

268621 +++$+++ Jbmurray +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-22 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.224681960E09 +++$+++ This is just a note to say that I have set up a GAR for [[Brenda Song]] [[Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment\/Brenda_Song\/1|here]].  This would seem the right way to air any differences that there may be concerning that article's recent GA review.  -- +++$+++ This is just a note to say that I have set up a GAR for [[Brenda Song]] [[Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Brenda_Song/1|here]].  This would seem the right way to air any differences that there may be concerning that article's recent GA review.  --[[User:Jbmurray|jbmurray]] ([[User talk:Jbmurray|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jbmurray|contribs]]) 06:26, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268622 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268621 +++$+++ 268621 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.224727320E09 +++$+++ Believe me, I know how difficult it is to try and rise above some of the misguided and overly personal criticism that masquerades as rational discussion on this site, but take heart from the fact that [[Brenda Song]] is much improved now as a result of your effort in providing the second opinion. The biggest problem that I see with GAR is that its purpose is not always as clear as it ought to be. It is too often not an assessment of whether a review was carried out properly or not, but a sick bed for malcontents to take their articles to in an attempt to circumvent a GAN. Just look at how long the present crop of GARs have been hanging around. Is the discussion ''really'' about whether the articles were reviewed correctly or not? I don't think so. If you haven't already seen it, [[Ireland]]'s GAR is a good case in point. An article that ought never to have been listed in the first place being resuscitated in an attempt to prove that I'm an incompetent. But, as one of the few decent administrators said to me recently, \"... we all contribute here knowing we're surrounded by nut jobs, dumbasses and children. You can't be surprised when stupid shit happens to you, and if you edit thinking 'It'll never be me,' you deserve to be the next.\" You're doing a great job. I think so, you think so. What does it matter what anyone else thinks? ;-) -- +++$+++ :Believe me, I know how difficult it is to try and rise above some of the misguided and overly personal criticism that masquerades as rational discussion on this site, but take heart from the fact that [[Brenda Song]] is much improved now as a result of your effort in providing the second opinion. The biggest problem that I see with GAR is that its purpose is not always as clear as it ought to be. It is too often not an assessment of whether a review was carried out properly or not, but a sick bed for malcontents to take their articles to in an attempt to circumvent a GAN. Just look at how long the present crop of GARs have been hanging around. Is the discussion ''really'' about whether the articles were reviewed correctly or not? I don't think so. If you haven't already seen it, [[Ireland]]'s GAR is a good case in point. An article that ought never to have been listed in the first place being resuscitated in an attempt to prove that I'm an incompetent. But, as one of the few decent administrators said to me recently, "... we all contribute here knowing we're surrounded by nut jobs, dumbasses and children. You can't be surprised when stupid shit happens to you, and if you edit thinking 'It'll never be me,' you deserve to be the next." You're doing a great job. I think so, you think so. What does it matter what anyone else thinks? ;-) --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 19:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268623 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268621 +++$+++ 268622 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.224731220E09 +++$+++ I have seen what is going on. No different than FAC. The [[Ireland]] article discussion is just a lower form (not so coated with egregious literary sophistication and pseudo witticisms) of the FAC discussions where the object is to go on and on, dragging things out to make sure nothing about FAC is changed so no one's power base is rattled. It is called \"putting out fires\". Power is used to protect those people who are useful because they do what they are told; this furthers personal interests, right or wrong. That an admin would vandalize, an admin whose job it is to keep FAC histories straight, would vandalize a GA page history repeatedly,  and an editor, who is normally so very judgmental of everyone else, would rush to get it fixed shows there are no values here.  It is all about control.   Disgusting and poisonous to FAC and now that attitude has been brought to GA and poisoned the well there.  The  [[Attachment therapy]] got passed because  its editor was encouraged during the GA review by an FAC intruder (who jumped into the GA review process, just before the decision was made  to pass) and declared the article  close to FAC. Actually, it is pathetic.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::I have seen what is going on. No different than FAC. The [[Ireland]] article discussion is just a lower form (not so coated with egregious literary sophistication and pseudo witticisms) of the FAC discussions where the object is to go on and on, dragging things out to make sure nothing about FAC is changed so no one's power base is rattled. It is called "putting out fires". Power is used to protect those people who are useful because they do what they are told; this furthers personal interests, right or wrong. That an admin would vandalize, an admin whose job it is to keep FAC histories straight, would vandalize a GA page history repeatedly,  and an editor, who is normally so very judgmental of everyone else, would rush to get it fixed shows there are no values here.  It is all about control.   Disgusting and poisonous to FAC and now that attitude has been brought to GA and poisoned the well there.  The  [[Attachment therapy]] got passed because  its editor was encouraged during the GA review by an FAC intruder (who jumped into the GA review process, just before the decision was made  to pass) and declared the article  close to FAC. Actually, it is pathetic.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:07, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268624 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268621 +++$+++ 268623 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.224734520E09 +++$+++ Attachment therapy is a pretty poor article, I agree. I'd be inclined to let the editors take it to FAC though, if they're so convinced it meets the criteria. Let them find out for themselves. -- +++$+++ :::Attachment therapy is a pretty poor article, I agree. I'd be inclined to let the editors take it to FAC though, if they're so convinced it meets the criteria. Let them find out for themselves. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 21:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268625 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268621 +++$+++ 268624 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.224735360E09 +++$+++ The trouble is that I have ethics. If the subject matter were different I would agree. Besides, you would be surprised at some of the articles that pass FAC when certain people have an investment. SandyGeorgia never forgave me for weighing in against an article by the same author on more or less the same subject. I have the email from her to prove it. How many of her boys are willing to be penalized in such a manner?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::The trouble is that I have ethics. If the subject matter were different I would agree. Besides, you would be surprised at some of the articles that pass FAC when certain people have an investment. SandyGeorgia never forgave me for weighing in against an article by the same author on more or less the same subject. I have the email from her to prove it. How many of her boys are willing to be penalized in such a manner?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268626 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268621 +++$+++ 268625 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.224736740E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't demonise SandyG; she's doing a ''very'' difficult job as best she can, and I think she does it pretty well. I certainly wouldn't want that job. Would you? You ought to look through some of the absolute horrors that Raul654 let through before SandyG took over. I understand your objections to the article, and I largely share them. But the question now is, where can those concerns most effectively be expressed? I'd suggest that's FAC rather than GAR. If the article isn't presented at FAC any time sooon then GAR it has to be. Think Machiavelli. Which course of action is most likely to lead to the outcome that you're hoping for? -- +++$+++ :::::I wouldn't demonise SandyG; she's doing a ''very'' difficult job as best she can, and I think she does it pretty well. I certainly wouldn't want that job. Would you? You ought to look through some of the absolute horrors that Raul654 let through before SandyG took over. I understand your objections to the article, and I largely share them. But the question now is, where can those concerns most effectively be expressed? I'd suggest that's FAC rather than GAR. If the article isn't presented at FAC any time sooon then GAR it has to be. Think Machiavelli. Which course of action is most likely to lead to the outcome that you're hoping for? --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 21:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268627 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268621 +++$+++ 268626 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.224739380E09 +++$+++ Re [[Attachment therapy]], I have strongly listed my objections and the person who passed the article agrees with them. He didn't know the subject matter, but once I pointed out the problems he quickly caught on and feels bad. He has brought the problems to the editor's attention, but the editor has not responded so far. I will see what he does. If I list it at GAR, SandyGeorgia and company will probably interfere again. I will list my objections.  If GAR has no balls, then I will find something else to do besides GA. If GA is that pathetic, then why bother with it further?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::Re [[Attachment therapy]], I have strongly listed my objections and the person who passed the article agrees with them. He didn't know the subject matter, but once I pointed out the problems he quickly caught on and feels bad. He has brought the problems to the editor's attention, but the editor has not responded so far. I will see what he does. If I list it at GAR, SandyGeorgia and company will probably interfere again. I will list my objections.  If GAR has no balls, then I will find something else to do besides GA. If GA is that pathetic, then why bother with it further?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:23, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268628 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268621 +++$+++ 268627 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.224739980E09 +++$+++ Be bold. If you take the article to GAR I'll certainly be pitching in on your side. -- +++$+++ :::::::Be bold. If you take the article to GAR I'll certainly be pitching in on your side. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 22:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268629 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268621 +++$+++ 268628 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.224740700E09 +++$+++ The other review asked me for some time to try to work with the editor and I agreed. After than, I probably will take it to GAR. So I thank you if you support my efforts, as you carry a lot of credibility in general, and you are about the only person that seems able to make SG back off.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::The other review asked me for some time to try to work with the editor and I agreed. After than, I probably will take it to GAR. So I thank you if you support my efforts, as you carry a lot of credibility in general, and you are about the only person that seems able to make SG back off.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268630 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268621 +++$+++ 268629 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.224741240E09 +++$+++ I am probably one of the few remaining [[WP:WikiDragon]]s. I have no credibility though, and absolutely no influence over SandyG, trust me. I just say what I think. Take it or leave it. -- +++$+++ :::::::::I am probably one of the few remaining [[WP:WikiDragon]]s. I have no credibility though, and absolutely no influence over SandyG, trust me. I just say what I think. Take it or leave it. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 22:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

530767 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530767 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-21 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.261398660E09 +++$+++ Out of curiosity, what's your stance on keep\/delete for Wisconsin?  I personally think that [[WP:POLITICIAN]] is a reasonable guidepost.  The reason I ask is because people like [[Ben Manski]] do not seem to meet that guidepost, but have survived an AfD. Meanwhile [[Thomas Kemp]], who has actually won some political office, appears likely to head for deletion.  I ask because I am considering re-nominating Ben Manski for AFD, but do not wish to if other [[WP:WPWI]] contributors have different ideas of notability.  Thanks! -- +++$+++ Out of curiosity, what's your stance on keep/delete for Wisconsin?  I personally think that [[WP:POLITICIAN]] is a reasonable guidepost.  The reason I ask is because people like [[Ben Manski]] do not seem to meet that guidepost, but have survived an AfD. Meanwhile [[Thomas Kemp]], who has actually won some political office, appears likely to head for deletion.  I ask because I am considering re-nominating Ben Manski for AFD, but do not wish to if other [[WP:WPWI]] contributors have different ideas of notability.  Thanks! --[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 04:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
530768 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530767 +++$+++ 530767 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.261399920E09 +++$+++ I judge by WP:POLITICIAN too. I would argue to keep Manski - not because he attempted minor political offices, but because he was the co-chair in a national political party. That appears to be his only area with notability, with the possible except of being the current head of a company with an article. I consider myself more on the inclusionist side, although I may be more middle of the road since Wikipedia as a whole has gravitated toward me in the past few years. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I judge by WP:POLITICIAN too. I would argue to keep Manski - not because he attempted minor political offices, but because he was the co-chair in a national political party. That appears to be his only area with notability, with the possible except of being the current head of a company with an article. I consider myself more on the inclusionist side, although I may be more middle of the road since Wikipedia as a whole has gravitated toward me in the past few years. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
530769 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530767 +++$+++ 530768 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.261400040E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I appreciate your input. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks, I appreciate your input. --[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 04:54, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
530770 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530767 +++$+++ 530767 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.261431960E09 +++$+++ Sorry to interrupt-Ben Manski is also an editor on Wikipedia and I think he may had ran against Doug LaFollette for the Wisconsin Secretary of State although I would have to do some checking on that one-Many thanks- +++$+++ :Sorry to interrupt-Ben Manski is also an editor on Wikipedia and I think he may had ran against Doug LaFollette for the Wisconsin Secretary of State although I would have to do some checking on that one-Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
530771 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530767 +++$+++ 530770 +++$+++ 2009-12-22 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.261477380E09 +++$+++ Very interesting, it's [[User:Ben Manski]]. Looks like he hasn't edited in a while. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Very interesting, it's [[User:Ben Manski]]. Looks like he hasn't edited in a while. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

6482 +++$+++ Apoc2400 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-30 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.249001160E09 +++$+++ Good work on [[Sagami River]]. Thanks a lot! -- +++$+++ Good work on [[Sagami River]]. Thanks a lot! --[[User:Apoc2400|Apoc2400]] ([[User talk:Apoc2400|talk]]) 17:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
6483 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6482 +++$+++ 6482 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.250561100E09 +++$+++ Hello. Your changes improved things, but there are still some issues to be resolved. -- +++$+++ :Hello. Your changes improved things, but there are still some issues to be resolved. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 19:05, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

530774 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-23 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.261637220E09 +++$+++ I just happened upon a good resource on the names and locations of Wisconsin unincorporated communities that you and [[User:RFD|RFD]] might be interested in. http:\/\/dhs.wi.gov\/VitalRecords\/pdf\/cvtlist.pdf.  It appears to be what the Wisconsin Dept. of Human Resources uses to find tiny hamlets while working with vital records. -- +++$+++ I just happened upon a good resource on the names and locations of Wisconsin unincorporated communities that you and [[User:RFD|RFD]] might be interested in. http://dhs.wi.gov/VitalRecords/pdf/cvtlist.pdf.  It appears to be what the Wisconsin Dept. of Human Resources uses to find tiny hamlets while working with vital records. --[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 22:47, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
530775 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530774 +++$+++ 530774 +++$+++ 2009-12-24 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.261644900E09 +++$+++ Wow, it's excellent! I checked out numerous communities from the past and present in my area and they're all there. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Wow, it's excellent! I checked out numerous communities from the past and present in my area and they're all there. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

268631 +++$+++ Fainites +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268631 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-22 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.224743340E09 +++$+++ Matisse thats hardly fair just to say there's no response in 1 day. I have posted a response and explained I'm very busy today and tomorrow but will get to it on Friday. I do actually work for a living you know.  +++$+++ Matisse thats hardly fair just to say there's no response in 1 day. I have posted a response and explained I'm very busy today and tomorrow but will get to it on Friday. I do actually work for a living you know. [[User:Fainites|Fainites]] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Fainites|barley]]</small></sup> 23:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268632 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268631 +++$+++ 268631 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.224743880E09 +++$+++ I have consulted an experienced GAR editor. I may start an individual GAR in which I list my concerns. You will have a little time to address them. I am very concerned about the ethical implications of having the article with its current information on Wikipedia. I am shocked, frankly. I will list my concerns and you can address them.  If you want, I can strip the article of the inappropriate material. Then, all you will have to worry about is the proper referencing of the material that is left. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I have consulted an experienced GAR editor. I may start an individual GAR in which I list my concerns. You will have a little time to address them. I am very concerned about the ethical implications of having the article with its current information on Wikipedia. I am shocked, frankly. I will list my concerns and you can address them.  If you want, I can strip the article of the inappropriate material. Then, all you will have to worry about is the proper referencing of the material that is left. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268633 +++$+++ Fainites +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268631 +++$+++ 268632 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.224744360E09 +++$+++ Well the articles been listed for GAN and then a second opinion for months. I'm quite happy to address your concerns - just not the second you express them. I hope to have time to look at it on Friday.  +++$+++ ::Well the articles been listed for GAN and then a second opinion for months. I'm quite happy to address your concerns - just not the second you express them. I hope to have time to look at it on Friday. [[User:Fainites|Fainites]] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Fainites|barley]]</small></sup> 23:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268634 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268631 +++$+++ 268633 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.224744720E09 +++$+++ I am aware of that. Unfortunately, there was an edit conflict. Just as I was listing my objections, the article was being passed. I would have listed my objections sooner, but frankly I did not think the article had a chance of being passed, so I waited. The problem is that it is now listed as a GA. I know that an article can be delisted immediately when it is inappropriately passed, as I have seen it happen many times. This article as it is should not be represented on Wikipedia as a GA. You are presenting a great deal of confusing information to the general reader, some of it quite misleading. That is my concern.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I am aware of that. Unfortunately, there was an edit conflict. Just as I was listing my objections, the article was being passed. I would have listed my objections sooner, but frankly I did not think the article had a chance of being passed, so I waited. The problem is that it is now listed as a GA. I know that an article can be delisted immediately when it is inappropriately passed, as I have seen it happen many times. This article as it is should not be represented on Wikipedia as a GA. You are presenting a great deal of confusing information to the general reader, some of it quite misleading. That is my concern.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:52, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

6488 +++$+++ UsagiM +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-21 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.261428420E09 +++$+++ Please, don't pretend that I did some \"major screw-up\" or something. Your remark on [[User_talk:Mario_Roering#Ito_versus_It.C5.8D|my talk page]] ''\"Please correct your numerous edits.\"'' was absolutely unnecessary! I did find only ONE mistake (in [[It\u014d Sachio]], where I overlooked the fact that he was born just FOUR years before the Meiji period and then the name is indeed written \"Family name first\"! I have corrected my edits there. For the rest of my edits I followed the guidelines of [[Wikipedia:Japanese]]. Maybe ''you'' should read those, before ''telling someone off'' on his talk page!!! &ndash;&nbsp; +++$+++ Please, don't pretend that I did some "major screw-up" or something. Your remark on [[User_talk:Mario_Roering#Ito_versus_It.C5.8D|my talk page]] ''"Please correct your numerous edits."'' was absolutely unnecessary! I did find only ONE mistake (in [[Itō Sachio]], where I overlooked the fact that he was born just FOUR years before the Meiji period and then the name is indeed written "Family name first"! I have corrected my edits there. For the rest of my edits I followed the guidelines of [[Wikipedia:Japanese]]. Maybe ''you'' should read those, before ''telling someone off'' on his talk page!!! &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:UsagiM|Usagi<font color="orange">''M''</font>]] 12:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
6489 +++$+++ UsagiM +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6488 +++$+++ 6488 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.261443660E09 +++$+++ Sorry if I sounded a bit agitated. You see, I have been in edit wars lately, been called a lot of things, been harassed, been insulted, been called a \"vandal\" and so on and so on. Had to take it up with ANI, and even just now I got a name change through, so if you were watching my talk page, please change it. It's now [[User_Talk:UsagiM|UsagiM]]. There I left a message to the discussion. I think you will (partly) agree... Regards and happy holidays! &ndash;&nbsp; +++$+++ :Sorry if I sounded a bit agitated. You see, I have been in edit wars lately, been called a lot of things, been harassed, been insulted, been called a "vandal" and so on and so on. Had to take it up with ANI, and even just now I got a name change through, so if you were watching my talk page, please change it. It's now [[User_Talk:UsagiM|UsagiM]]. There I left a message to the discussion. I think you will (partly) agree... Regards and happy holidays! &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:UsagiM|Usagi<font color="orange">''M''</font>]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:UsagiM|<sub>''talk to me''</sub>]] 17:01, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

268635 +++$+++ Jbmurray +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-23 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.224745980E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry if for you this experience has been \"horrible.\"  I certainly have had no intention to \"attack\" or \"bully\" you, and indeed have ''not'' attacked or bullied you.  -- +++$+++ I'm sorry if for you this experience has been "horrible."  I certainly have had no intention to "attack" or "bully" you, and indeed have ''not'' attacked or bullied you.  --[[User:Jbmurray|jbmurray]] ([[User talk:Jbmurray|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jbmurray|contribs]]) 00:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
268636 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268635 +++$+++ 268635 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.224746640E09 +++$+++ Ah, so you involved Geometryguy. It was a set up  No wonder he deleted my comments from the GAR. He is part of this protective ingroup. SandyGeorgia contacts you because, one of her favs gets blocked for vandalizing the article history. You take over and summon another of the family for an \"objective\" view.  SandyGeorgia's comments were completely dismissive of GA. Then she goes on to give reasons that are not true, and that  show a misunderstanding of the GA criteria. I explain the criteria. and Geometryguy deletes them. So the unpleasant, demeaning comments of SandyGeorgia are allowed to misrepresent GA with no correction. Makes sense now.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Ah, so you involved Geometryguy. It was a set up  No wonder he deleted my comments from the GAR. He is part of this protective ingroup. SandyGeorgia contacts you because, one of her favs gets blocked for vandalizing the article history. You take over and summon another of the family for an "objective" view.  SandyGeorgia's comments were completely dismissive of GA. Then she goes on to give reasons that are not true, and that  show a misunderstanding of the GA criteria. I explain the criteria. and Geometryguy deletes them. So the unpleasant, demeaning comments of SandyGeorgia are allowed to misrepresent GA with no correction. Makes sense now.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
268637 +++$+++ Jbmurray +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268635 +++$+++ 268636 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.224747120E09 +++$+++ (copied over from my talk page:) Mattisse... How about assuming good faith!?  My ping of Geometryguy was not a \"set up.\"  I can hardly think of anyone else who is better versed in GA processes.  And he is ''certainly'' not someone who is dismissive of GA.  (Nor, incidentally, am I.)  This is not some kind of conspiracy.  Everything here is above board, and everything I've done is to clear the air, not to bully or to demean or whatever else.  -- +++$+++ ::(copied over from my talk page:) Mattisse... How about assuming good faith!?  My ping of Geometryguy was not a "set up."  I can hardly think of anyone else who is better versed in GA processes.  And he is ''certainly'' not someone who is dismissive of GA.  (Nor, incidentally, am I.)  This is not some kind of conspiracy.  Everything here is above board, and everything I've done is to clear the air, not to bully or to demean or whatever else.  --[[User:Jbmurray|jbmurray]] ([[User talk:Jbmurray|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jbmurray|contribs]]) 00:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
268638 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268635 +++$+++ 268637 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.224749400E09 +++$+++ I am not basing this on one instance. This is a pattern I have been observing for quite a while, at least more than a year. This is the second example of this sort of thing in the last few days. In fact, it is the third example, if I count the FAC editor interjecting into a GA review that the article was almost on FAC, causing the article which multiple editors had agonized over for months because it was such a mess, to be promoted right away. It is an article that never should have been promoted. It is misleading and confused, and the editor that promoted it now agrees. But what to do now. It needs a massive amount of work. It has been edited basically by one person with over 900 edits. Obviously the GAR would be a nightmare because of the same interference and conflict of interest that plagued this one.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I am not basing this on one instance. This is a pattern I have been observing for quite a while, at least more than a year. This is the second example of this sort of thing in the last few days. In fact, it is the third example, if I count the FAC editor interjecting into a GA review that the article was almost on FAC, causing the article which multiple editors had agonized over for months because it was such a mess, to be promoted right away. It is an article that never should have been promoted. It is misleading and confused, and the editor that promoted it now agrees. But what to do now. It needs a massive amount of work. It has been edited basically by one person with over 900 edits. Obviously the GAR would be a nightmare because of the same interference and conflict of interest that plagued this one.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:10, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
268639 +++$+++ Jbmurray +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268635 +++$+++ 268638 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.224760980E09 +++$+++ (copied over from my talk page:) Well, again, I'm sorry that you're unwilling to assume good faith.  I have nothing at all to do with whatever other article you're alluding to here.  -- +++$+++ ::::(copied over from my talk page:) Well, again, I'm sorry that you're unwilling to assume good faith.  I have nothing at all to do with whatever other article you're alluding to here.  --[[User:Jbmurray|jbmurray]] ([[User talk:Jbmurray|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jbmurray|contribs]]) 04:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
268640 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268635 +++$+++ 268639 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.224761220E09 +++$+++ I know you did not. I am merely remarking on a systematic pattern that I have observed. I did not mean to imply it was you. I never thought that although I knew you were on the radar.  I am talking about a systematic pattern of behavior utilizing many other editors, as needed, for the occasion.   &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I know you did not. I am merely remarking on a systematic pattern that I have observed. I did not mean to imply it was you. I never thought that although I knew you were on the radar.  I am talking about a systematic pattern of behavior utilizing many other editors, as needed, for the occasion.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:27, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

530780 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530780 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-24 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.261669860E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | [[User:Royalbroil|Royalbroil]] is recognized for 100 contributions to [[T:DYK|DYK]]. Thanks very much for your many contributions to this area of the project. [[David Pearson (NASCAR driver)]] is quite a comprehensive article for a DYK, it is practically a [[WP:GA]] already. Nice job. ''' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | [[User:Royalbroil|Royalbroil]] is recognized for 100 contributions to [[T:DYK|DYK]]. Thanks very much for your many contributions to this area of the project. [[David Pearson (NASCAR driver)]] is quite a comprehensive article for a DYK, it is practically a [[WP:GA]] already. Nice job. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
530781 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530780 +++$+++ 530780 +++$+++ 2009-12-24 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.261689000E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the medal, especially coming from such a familiar face! Thank you for all that you do too. I decided to \"go for broke\" on my 100th DYK which is why it took me months. I decided to do a large improvement on a neglected high-profile topic. It's been a long time coming - I never guessed that I'd get this many. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I appreciate the medal, especially coming from such a familiar face! Thank you for all that you do too. I decided to "go for broke" on my 100th DYK which is why it took me months. I decided to do a large improvement on a neglected high-profile topic. It's been a long time coming - I never guessed that I'd get this many. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
530782 +++$+++ Freekee +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530780 +++$+++ 530781 +++$+++ 2009-12-24 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.261697640E09 +++$+++ You only just now got to 100? I figured you'd be way past that by now. :-) Congratulations! - +++$+++ ::You only just now got to 100? I figured you'd be way past that by now. :-) Congratulations! -[[User:Freekee|Freekee]] ([[User talk:Freekee|talk]]) 15:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
530783 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530780 +++$+++ 530782 +++$+++ 2009-12-24 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.261701840E09 +++$+++ Working out full-time, a bad internet connection for the past 6 months, and lots of track chasing have cut into my free time a whole bunch. Plus I did a complete rewrite on a major topic. [[David Pearson (NASCAR driver)]] is now nominated for Good Article. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Working out full-time, a bad internet connection for the past 6 months, and lots of track chasing have cut into my free time a whole bunch. Plus I did a complete rewrite on a major topic. [[David Pearson (NASCAR driver)]] is now nominated for Good Article. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 16:44, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

569061 +++$+++ Tizio +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-30 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.162245180E09 +++$+++ A further investigation shows [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AVintei&diff=84222796&oldid=82852214 this edit] followed by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3A%28aeropagitica%29&diff=84507740&oldid=84507147 this rollback]. An administrator is not suppposed to behave this way. I sometimes do mistakes too, and I receive complaints on my talk page, but I never used rollback on them. [[User talk:Tizio|Tizio]], [[Special:Contributions\/Tizio|Caio]],  +++$+++ A further investigation shows [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AVintei&diff=84222796&oldid=82852214 this edit] followed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A%28aeropagitica%29&diff=84507740&oldid=84507147 this rollback]. An administrator is not suppposed to behave this way. I sometimes do mistakes too, and I receive complaints on my talk page, but I never used rollback on them. [[User talk:Tizio|Tizio]], [[Special:Contributions/Tizio|Caio]], [[User:Tizio|Sempronio]] 13:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
569062 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569061 +++$+++ 569061 +++$+++ 2006-10-30 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.162251060E09 +++$+++ Apologies, it must have been at the end of a long admin session.  I was not aware of the content of your communication.  As to the templates, the only one of which I am aware was the speedy application, placed on the deleted redirect page by another user.  I deleted quite a few nonsensical redirect pages yesterday and the one to which your name was appended in the history appeared to be identical to the others.  You can disregard any warnings given out. Regards,  +++$+++ :Apologies, it must have been at the end of a long admin session.  I was not aware of the content of your communication.  As to the templates, the only one of which I am aware was the speedy application, placed on the deleted redirect page by another user.  I deleted quite a few nonsensical redirect pages yesterday and the one to which your name was appended in the history appeared to be identical to the others.  You can disregard any warnings given out. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 15:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

530784 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-25 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.261784100E09 +++$+++ |align=\"center\"|Here\u2019s wishing you a happy end to the holiday season and a wonderful 2010.<br> +++$+++ |align="center"|Here’s wishing you a happy end to the holiday season and a wonderful 2010.<br>[[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 15:35, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
530785 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530784 +++$+++ 530784 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.261815720E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I wish you, all of my [[WP:TPS|talk page stalkers]], and other readers happy Holidays and a Merry Christmas to all of the Christians. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thank you! I wish you, all of my [[WP:TPS|talk page stalkers]], and other readers happy Holidays and a Merry Christmas to all of the Christians. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
530786 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530784 +++$+++ 530785 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.261825800E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :P  +++$+++ ::Thanks! :P [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 03:10, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
530787 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530784 +++$+++ 530786 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.261826100E09 +++$+++ Merry Christmas to you too, Shub! Good luck with your RFA. It has been going well so far. I see that others have shared my view. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Merry Christmas to you too, Shub! Good luck with your RFA. It has been going well so far. I see that others have shared my view. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:15, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
530788 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530784 +++$+++ 530787 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.261826880E09 +++$+++ Yeah, so far. RfA is similar to, but different than, FAC; with RfA once the questions are down you can sit back and (maybe) relax. I'm keeping my fingers crossed...  +++$+++ ::::Yeah, so far. RfA is similar to, but different than, FAC; with RfA once the questions are down you can sit back and (maybe) relax. I'm keeping my fingers crossed... [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 03:28, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

6497 +++$+++ Loosmark +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-03 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.283544600E09 +++$+++ Hi, do you mind if I move your article to [[Japanese gunboat Uji (1903)]]? There is a later gunboat having the same name, see [[Japanese gunboat Uji (1940)]]. I am currently working on that article and I believe the launch year is the proper way to disambiguate the two.  +++$+++ Hi, do you mind if I move your article to [[Japanese gunboat Uji (1903)]]? There is a later gunboat having the same name, see [[Japanese gunboat Uji (1940)]]. I am currently working on that article and I believe the launch year is the proper way to disambiguate the two. [[User:Loosmark|<span style="background:#acf;padding:2px;color:black; 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em">&nbsp;'''Dr. Loosmark'''&nbsp;</span>]] 13:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
6498 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6497 +++$+++ 6497 +++$+++ 2010-09-03 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.283550660E09 +++$+++ Yes, please do so! I was going to get around to the 1940 gunboat Uji eventually myself, so please go ahead and move my article. Thanks for the courtesy for the message! -- +++$+++ : Yes, please do so! I was going to get around to the 1940 gunboat Uji eventually myself, so please go ahead and move my article. Thanks for the courtesy for the message! --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 14:51, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

6499 +++$+++ NortyNort +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-03 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.286127300E09 +++$+++ Hey, I was coincidentally assessing dam articles in Japan and I saw you previously created a bunch of the articles and just joined WikiProject Dams. It was nice to see your articles in the midst of the many stubs, very nice. By the way, I moved the \"base width\" on a few to \"length\" in the infobox fields. It seems the dam's length may have been accidentally put it in the width field. A few of the sources corroborated this but for a few I didn't know for sure. It seemed more plausible but if I am wrong, please revert me. Anyway, after working Brazil, I was going to work on dams in Asia, particularly China. Do you usually just work Japan?-- +++$+++ Hey, I was coincidentally assessing dam articles in Japan and I saw you previously created a bunch of the articles and just joined WikiProject Dams. It was nice to see your articles in the midst of the many stubs, very nice. By the way, I moved the "base width" on a few to "length" in the infobox fields. It seems the dam's length may have been accidentally put it in the width field. A few of the sources corroborated this but for a few I didn't know for sure. It seemed more plausible but if I am wrong, please revert me. Anyway, after working Brazil, I was going to work on dams in Asia, particularly China. Do you usually just work Japan?--[[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]]  <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 10:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
6500 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6499 +++$+++ 6499 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.286127420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message! Yes, since I am living in Japan, I am mostly working on Japanese-related topics. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the message! Yes, since I am living in Japan, I am mostly working on Japanese-related topics. --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 10:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
6501 +++$+++ NortyNort +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6499 +++$+++ 6500 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.286128680E09 +++$+++ Cool, I live in Okinawa right now. I asked [[User:Dr. Blofeld]] on his talk page what happened to the dams in Japan project because it seemed to have stopped. He said he was interesting in starting it up again. I am not sure if you want to help out.-- +++$+++ ::Cool, I live in Okinawa right now. I asked [[User:Dr. Blofeld]] on his talk page what happened to the dams in Japan project because it seemed to have stopped. He said he was interesting in starting it up again. I am not sure if you want to help out.--[[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]]  <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 10:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

568638 +++$+++ Zhanster +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-05 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.154781960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for deleting my page. Can you do me one more favour please? Can you change my username to Archangel. If not, thanks anyway.  +++$+++ Thanks for deleting my page. Can you do me one more favour please? Can you change my username to Archangel. If not, thanks anyway. [[User:Zhanster|Zhanster]] 05:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
568639 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568638 +++$+++ 568638 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.154788380E09 +++$+++ I can't change usernames.  You are going to have to follow the process above in order to do that. Regards, <span style=\"border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :I can't change usernames.  You are going to have to follow the process above in order to do that. Regards, <span style="border:1px solid #808;padding:1px;">[[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<font style="color:#fff;background:#808;">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</font><font style="color:#808;background:#fff;">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 07:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

530789 +++$+++ Johncoracing48 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-26 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.261825620E09 +++$+++ Hello. I just wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas. I hope you enjoy the Holidays.-- +++$+++ Hello. I just wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas. I hope you enjoy the Holidays.--[[User:Johncoracing48|Johncoracing48]] ([[User talk:Johncoracing48|talk]]) 03:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
530790 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530789 +++$+++ 530789 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.261825740E09 +++$+++ Thank you, and Merry Christmas to you too! I have been enjoying them so far, and I hope that you do too. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thank you, and Merry Christmas to you too! I have been enjoying them so far, and I hope that you do too. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:09, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

268647 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-23 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.224792540E09 +++$+++ I just saw (and responded to) your initiation of a GAR on this article.  I am disappointed that you did not give Fainite more time to respond to your concerns before submitting this article to GAR.  When you request that editors make major changes to the article (seemingly without warning, as you did not post your concerns in the GAR review, even though the article had been at GAN for over two months and tagged for 2nd review for over a month), you really should give the editor more than a day to respond, and when they ask for a couple of days to make the changes, some leeway should be granted.  +++$+++ I just saw (and responded to) your initiation of a GAR on this article.  I am disappointed that you did not give Fainite more time to respond to your concerns before submitting this article to GAR.  When you request that editors make major changes to the article (seemingly without warning, as you did not post your concerns in the GAR review, even though the article had been at GAN for over two months and tagged for 2nd review for over a month), you really should give the editor more than a day to respond, and when they ask for a couple of days to make the changes, some leeway should be granted. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer|talk]]) 13:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
268648 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.224814860E09 +++$+++ I consulted with an experience GAR editor who also has degrees in psychology. His opinion was to put it up for GAR  now, sharing the concern that the problems were massive and that the one editor had lost perspective. It took me over an hour just to figure out the heading structure and attempt to figure out roughly what the sections contained. The GAR process is meant to be constructive and lasts a long time. In the first part, editors offer suggestions and also help to fix the article. It is only when the conclusion is reached that the article cannot be fixed enough to remain GA that the process moves to the second stage. In that stage, editors vote whether to delist or not. The outcome may well be to keep it as a Ga article. This is a very ''slow'' process and can last months. I did this because I think the editor is too close to the article and  cannot possibly do it alone. Here is a way to get the constructive input from many editors.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::I consulted with an experience GAR editor who also has degrees in psychology. His opinion was to put it up for GAR  now, sharing the concern that the problems were massive and that the one editor had lost perspective. It took me over an hour just to figure out the heading structure and attempt to figure out roughly what the sections contained. The GAR process is meant to be constructive and lasts a long time. In the first part, editors offer suggestions and also help to fix the article. It is only when the conclusion is reached that the article cannot be fixed enough to remain GA that the process moves to the second stage. In that stage, editors vote whether to delist or not. The outcome may well be to keep it as a Ga article. This is a very ''slow'' process and can last months. I did this because I think the editor is too close to the article and  cannot possibly do it alone. Here is a way to get the constructive input from many editors.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:21, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
268649 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.224816060E09 +++$+++ Now, since you've put it up for GAR already, there's nothing really I can do about it, except for expressing (as I already have) my desire for a brief waiting period to give Fainite some time to work on the article, as they already said they would when they get a few spare minutes.  Just because someone says that they are busy with RL and can't work on something until the weekend doesn't mean they are disregarding your comments, and just because someone is the main editor to an article doesn't mean that they have lost their perspective.  In this case, it probably means that no-one else cares about the article.  From a look at the talk page, there have been no major disputes, and from reading previous talk page discussions, Fainite has actually been quite active in keeping NPOV pro-AT information ''out of'' the article.  I really think you may be over-reacting to this, but as I said, there's nothing I can do now that you've posted the GAR. However, that's just my opinion, and perhaps I'm wrong, so I hope that you and Fainite can manage to sort out your differences.  Perhaps, just perhaps, if someone else constructively offered to help edit the article (rather than threatening with GARs and delistings and calling their work POV), the editor would be most appreciative, considering not many other people seemed to be interested in helping on the run-up to GA status. Just a thought...  +++$+++ :::Now, since you've put it up for GAR already, there's nothing really I can do about it, except for expressing (as I already have) my desire for a brief waiting period to give Fainite some time to work on the article, as they already said they would when they get a few spare minutes.  Just because someone says that they are busy with RL and can't work on something until the weekend doesn't mean they are disregarding your comments, and just because someone is the main editor to an article doesn't mean that they have lost their perspective.  In this case, it probably means that no-one else cares about the article.  From a look at the talk page, there have been no major disputes, and from reading previous talk page discussions, Fainite has actually been quite active in keeping NPOV pro-AT information ''out of'' the article.  I really think you may be over-reacting to this, but as I said, there's nothing I can do now that you've posted the GAR. However, that's just my opinion, and perhaps I'm wrong, so I hope that you and Fainite can manage to sort out your differences.  Perhaps, just perhaps, if someone else constructively offered to help edit the article (rather than threatening with GARs and delistings and calling their work POV), the editor would be most appreciative, considering not many other people seemed to be interested in helping on the run-up to GA status. Just a thought... [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer|talk]]) 19:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
268650 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.224820020E09 +++$+++ Whatever mistakes I have made in listing this article, you can be sure that someone will weigh in and tell me so. I don't think anything dramatically awful will happen. Perhaps it will just be closed as unwarranted. Let's see what others have to say. Remember, this article has essentially been on GAN since the spring. There have been two formal GA reviews before yours (by [[User:Nikki311|Nikki311]] and [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]]) in which editors have tried to help. Other editors such as  [[User:Michael Devore|Michael Devore]], an excellent copy editor, tried. Why has the article not been to peer review? The problem is that the article attempts to present topics in the fields of medicine\/psychiatry\/psychology but has not received any through reviews by people familiar with the general field. The wikilinks in the article are particularly misleading. I struggled through them, as many of the wikilinked articles are below par, so it is not always clear how reputable the information in them is. The poor state of the wikilinked articles would not be such a problem if their context in [[Attachment therapy]] were clear. Some of them are just plain irrelevant to the article context, but give the appearance of legitimacy.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Whatever mistakes I have made in listing this article, you can be sure that someone will weigh in and tell me so. I don't think anything dramatically awful will happen. Perhaps it will just be closed as unwarranted. Let's see what others have to say. Remember, this article has essentially been on GAN since the spring. There have been two formal GA reviews before yours (by [[User:Nikki311|Nikki311]] and [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]]) in which editors have tried to help. Other editors such as  [[User:Michael Devore|Michael Devore]], an excellent copy editor, tried. Why has the article not been to peer review? The problem is that the article attempts to present topics in the fields of medicine/psychiatry/psychology but has not received any through reviews by people familiar with the general field. The wikilinks in the article are particularly misleading. I struggled through them, as many of the wikilinked articles are below par, so it is not always clear how reputable the information in them is. The poor state of the wikilinked articles would not be such a problem if their context in [[Attachment therapy]] were clear. Some of them are just plain irrelevant to the article context, but give the appearance of legitimacy.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
268651 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.224821160E09 +++$+++ I think GAR is a very good choice for this article. GAR isn't a vote, but it isn't like FAR\/FARC either. Editors assess the article against the criteria, try within reason to fix problems, but if too much work is needed, then it is better to delist and renominate. '' +++$+++ :::::I think GAR is a very good choice for this article. GAR isn't a vote, but it isn't like FAR/FARC either. Editors assess the article against the criteria, try within reason to fix problems, but if too much work is needed, then it is better to delist and renominate. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 21:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
268652 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.224821820E09 +++$+++ As the editor who encouraged Mattisse to take this article to GAR, if any blame is to be dished out then it should be laid at my door. I think it has serious problems in its present form and ought not to have been listed. Precisely what I thought GAR was designed to deal with. If those problems can indeed be fixed quickly, then so much the better, nothing lost, but I have my doubts that they can. -- +++$+++ :::::As the editor who encouraged Mattisse to take this article to GAR, if any blame is to be dished out then it should be laid at my door. I think it has serious problems in its present form and ought not to have been listed. Precisely what I thought GAR was designed to deal with. If those problems can indeed be fixed quickly, then so much the better, nothing lost, but I have my doubts that they can. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 21:17, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

6504 +++$+++ Eskimo.the +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6504 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-04 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.291467960E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{tlc|proposed deletion\/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Eskimo.the|The Eskimo]] ([[User talk:Eskimo.the|talk]]) 05:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
6505 +++$+++ Eskimo.the +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6504 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-04 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.291470480E09 +++$+++ I appreciate you finding sources.  I cannot read and\/or comprehend Japanese, but I understand that doesn't mean anything as far as the references are concerned.  I just can't verify the facts, is all.  Can you please make sure the fact in the article are limited to the facts in the sources, and, if not, delete all other info?  Thanks!  +++$+++ :: I appreciate you finding sources.  I cannot read and/or comprehend Japanese, but I understand that doesn't mean anything as far as the references are concerned.  I just can't verify the facts, is all.  Can you please make sure the fact in the article are limited to the facts in the sources, and, if not, delete all other info?  Thanks! [[User:Eskimo.the|The Eskimo]] ([[User talk:Eskimo.the|talk]]) 05:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

530794 +++$+++ Armorbearer777 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-27 09:24:00 +++$+++ 1.261934640E09 +++$+++ Please help us improve this page  +++$+++ Please help us improve this page [[User:Armorbearer777|Armorbearer777]] ([[User talk:Armorbearer777|talk]]) 09:24, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
530795 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530794 +++$+++ 530794 +++$+++ 2009-12-27 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.261951560E09 +++$+++ At least there are assertions of notability for that article. It supposedly airs internationally and it won [[Dove Award]]s (I assume that's what the article means) which are quite notable. These are the type of things that you should look for when writing an article. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :At least there are assertions of notability for that article. It supposedly airs internationally and it won [[Dove Award]]s (I assume that's what the article means) which are quite notable. These are the type of things that you should look for when writing an article. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 14:06, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
530796 +++$+++ Armorbearer777 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530794 +++$+++ 530795 +++$+++ 2009-12-27 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.261949460E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your honest input and your time. Happy New Year!  +++$+++ ::Thank you for your honest input and your time. Happy New Year! [[User:Armorbearer777|Armorbearer777]] ([[User talk:Armorbearer777|talk]]) 13:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

268653 +++$+++ DanTD +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-23 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.224795180E09 +++$+++ You or your bot tagged [[Morton (SEPTA station)]] extensivley for a lack of inline citiations, sources, etcetera. Do you think I can remove any of them now? ---- +++$+++ You or your bot tagged [[Morton (SEPTA station)]] extensivley for a lack of inline citiations, sources, etcetera. Do you think I can remove any of them now? ----[[User:DanTD|DanTD]] ([[User talk:DanTD|talk]]) 13:53, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
268654 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268653 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.224813840E09 +++$+++ Done. Good job!  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Done. Good job!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

87507 +++$+++ Ebikeguy +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-04 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.301960160E09 +++$+++ Your original citation request language specifically asked for a citation showing that both pronunciations of mixte were widely used.  I thought Sheldon's entry on the subject answered that nicely.  What else are you looking for in terms of a reference?  Sorry if I'm being a bit thick here.  Let me know what you want and I will do my best to provide it.  Thanks.   +++$+++ Your original citation request language specifically asked for a citation showing that both pronunciations of mixte were widely used.  I thought Sheldon's entry on the subject answered that nicely.  What else are you looking for in terms of a reference?  Sorry if I'm being a bit thick here.  Let me know what you want and I will do my best to provide it.  Thanks.  [[User:Ebikeguy|Ebikeguy]] ([[User talk:Ebikeguy|talk]]) 16:36, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
87508 +++$+++ Ebikeguy +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87507 +++$+++ 87507 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.301970060E09 +++$+++ I think I understand your perspective, perhaps.  Sheldon explained the pronunciation in French and English, but did not suggest that one pronunciation was widely used in both languages.  I did a search, but could not find an RS that showed the French pronunciation to be widely used in an English-speaking country.  Since this is the English Wikpedia, I thought my inability to find such an RS was reasonable grounds to remove the claim, which I did.  Thoughts?   +++$+++ : I think I understand your perspective, perhaps.  Sheldon explained the pronunciation in French and English, but did not suggest that one pronunciation was widely used in both languages.  I did a search, but could not find an RS that showed the French pronunciation to be widely used in an English-speaking country.  Since this is the English Wikpedia, I thought my inability to find such an RS was reasonable grounds to remove the claim, which I did.  Thoughts?  [[User:Ebikeguy|Ebikeguy]] ([[User talk:Ebikeguy|talk]]) 19:21, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
87509 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87507 +++$+++ 87508 +++$+++ 2011-04-05 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.302011760E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that's fine with me. After you added the ref and I looked it up I was in two minds whether to remove the \"widely used\" sentence myself or request a citation for it\u2014in retrospect I probably chose wrongly.  +++$+++ ::Thanks, that's fine with me. After you added the ref and I looked it up I was in two minds whether to remove the "widely used" sentence myself or request a citation for it—in retrospect I probably chose wrongly. [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 06:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

268656 +++$+++ Dylan620 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-21 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.224573420E09 +++$+++ Hi! I'm Dylan, GA nominator of the ''Rocko's Modern Life'' article. I was getting tired of waiting for comments on it, so I came to you for a GA review (I chose you over everyone else because the only GA reviews that I've seen so far were by you). If it fails the GA review, I have an additional source [http:\/\/joemurraystudio.com\/blog\/?page_id=346] given to me by [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] (a primary contributor to the article), and if that's still not enough, I suggest a peer review, to suggest ideas to improve the article to GA, or in time even FA. -- +++$+++ Hi! I'm Dylan, GA nominator of the ''Rocko's Modern Life'' article. I was getting tired of waiting for comments on it, so I came to you for a GA review (I chose you over everyone else because the only GA reviews that I've seen so far were by you). If it fails the GA review, I have an additional source [http://joemurraystudio.com/blog/?page_id=346] given to me by [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] (a primary contributor to the article), and if that's still not enough, I suggest a peer review, to suggest ideas to improve the article to GA, or in time even FA. --[[User:Dylan620|Dylan620]] ([[User talk:Dylan620|talk]]) 00:17, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
268657 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268656 +++$+++ 268656 +++$+++ 2008-10-21 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.224576480E09 +++$+++ I looked at ''[[Rocko's Modern Life]]'' and it obvious that a lot of hard work has gone into it and there is a lot of very good information.  For GA though, you have to consider the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|Good article criteria]] very seriously. The references have to be formatted correctly  and  the writing has to be reasonably good and to flow well. You can't have many short paragraphs. Some sections might have to be beefed up, like the  '''Reception''' section. Two really models for TV series articles are [[The Simpsons]] and [[Animaniacs]]. You can see that the writing is tight and flows well. Sometimes peer review is  a good place to start before GA review.  Are you willing to work on the article to fix up its writing style if I list all the issues in a GA review? Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I looked at ''[[Rocko's Modern Life]]'' and it obvious that a lot of hard work has gone into it and there is a lot of very good information.  For GA though, you have to consider the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|Good article criteria]] very seriously. The references have to be formatted correctly  and  the writing has to be reasonably good and to flow well. You can't have many short paragraphs. Some sections might have to be beefed up, like the  '''Reception''' section. Two really models for TV series articles are [[The Simpsons]] and [[Animaniacs]]. You can see that the writing is tight and flows well. Sometimes peer review is  a good place to start before GA review.  Are you willing to work on the article to fix up its writing style if I list all the issues in a GA review? Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:08, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
268658 +++$+++ Dylan620 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268656 +++$+++ 268657 +++$+++ 2008-10-21 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.224607500E09 +++$+++ Certainly! My father has showed me some useful info on the creator's website that could not only help improve the show's article, but expand the character articles as well; this info may help [[Rocko]] become a GA, and extend multiple other articles in the topic past Stub-class. But in order to really know what to do about the [[Rocko's Modern Life]] topic, I may have to start a task force on the subject. However, to do that, I would have to join [[WP:NICK]]. This would be the second WikiProject I have joined, by the way, after [[WP:WPTC]].  +++$+++ ::Certainly! My father has showed me some useful info on the creator's website that could not only help improve the show's article, but expand the character articles as well; this info may help [[Rocko]] become a GA, and extend multiple other articles in the topic past Stub-class. But in order to really know what to do about the [[Rocko's Modern Life]] topic, I may have to start a task force on the subject. However, to do that, I would have to join [[WP:NICK]]. This would be the second WikiProject I have joined, by the way, after [[WP:WPTC]]. [[User:Dylan620|Dylan620]] ([[User talk:Dylan620|talk]]) 09:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
268659 +++$+++ Dylan620 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268656 +++$+++ 268658 +++$+++ 2008-10-24 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.224912840E09 +++$+++ I saw the issue with the pictures in the [[Rocko's Modern Life#DVD Collection|DVD Collection]]. I agree; the pictures are unreasonably large. But I'm not sure what I can do; the pictures are probably so big so that the table can fit the episode lists. Is there any way to shrink the table without hurting quality? That would be (possibly) going ''backwards'' in this GAN. -- +++$+++ :::I saw the issue with the pictures in the [[Rocko's Modern Life#DVD Collection|DVD Collection]]. I agree; the pictures are unreasonably large. But I'm not sure what I can do; the pictures are probably so big so that the table can fit the episode lists. Is there any way to shrink the table without hurting quality? That would be (possibly) going ''backwards'' in this GAN. --[[User:Dylan620|Dylan620]] ([[User talk:Dylan620|talk]]) 22:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
268660 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268656 +++$+++ 268659 +++$+++ 2008-10-24 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.224913620E09 +++$+++ I suggested on [[Talk:Rocko's Modern Life\/GA1]] that you consider reducing the pic size, eg <nowiki>[[:Image:51YSdphdOfL SS500 .jpg|100x100px]]<\/nowiki>, or even <nowiki>[[:Image:51YSdphdOfL SS500 .jpg|50x50px]]<\/nowiki>. You can control the size of the images and make them what ever size you want.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I suggested on [[Talk:Rocko's Modern Life/GA1]] that you consider reducing the pic size, eg <nowiki>[[:Image:51YSdphdOfL SS500 .jpg|100x100px]]</nowiki>, or even <nowiki>[[:Image:51YSdphdOfL SS500 .jpg|50x50px]]</nowiki>. You can control the size of the images and make them what ever size you want.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

530801 +++$+++ Armorbearer777 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-29 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.262090340E09 +++$+++ '''Please Note'''  [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]] is about as well known in the area of Christian Metal as it can be.   Unfortunately the magazines that cover the Christian Metal culture won't really publish anything on them.  But they have been notible enough to trade airtime for magazine ads. I hope that the radio liners from notable artists & from Kirk Cameron at least help establish some notability. We also found a couple references about the show on a couple bios from the band Armed Conflict who performs the [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]] theme song. The [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]] is hardly [[Focus on the Family]] in notability, but considering that Christian Metal music does not really take the spotlight in the coporate Christian music world and is very much a counter culture and that the show is certainly NOT corporate radio, it has gotten as much coverage as a radio show of it's type can, without switching over to mainstream CCM stuff like Skillet or Flyleaf.  Which would not be bad, just not the direction that I think he is taking the show.  I know that they are very popular in the Christian Motorcycle world, the Christian Extreme Sports worls and have a growing populatity in the Christian Motorsports world. This biggest problem with the notability of the show is that it's main audience is an un-tapped radio market. So even though it is not the most famous show in radio, it certainly is the most recognized radio show in it's scope. As wikipedia policy states: '''\"Article topics are required to be notable, or \"worthy of notice.\" Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things like fame, importance, or the popularity of a topic\u2014although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject\"''' , food for thought. I am going to work on other articles while I continue to work on this one. Your encouragement is certainly appreciated more than you know.   +++$+++ '''Please Note'''  [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]] is about as well known in the area of Christian Metal as it can be.   Unfortunately the magazines that cover the Christian Metal culture won't really publish anything on them.  But they have been notible enough to trade airtime for magazine ads. I hope that the radio liners from notable artists & from Kirk Cameron at least help establish some notability. We also found a couple references about the show on a couple bios from the band Armed Conflict who performs the [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]] theme song. The [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]] is hardly [[Focus on the Family]] in notability, but considering that Christian Metal music does not really take the spotlight in the coporate Christian music world and is very much a counter culture and that the show is certainly NOT corporate radio, it has gotten as much coverage as a radio show of it's type can, without switching over to mainstream CCM stuff like Skillet or Flyleaf.  Which would not be bad, just not the direction that I think he is taking the show.  I know that they are very popular in the Christian Motorcycle world, the Christian Extreme Sports worls and have a growing populatity in the Christian Motorsports world. This biggest problem with the notability of the show is that it's main audience is an un-tapped radio market. So even though it is not the most famous show in radio, it certainly is the most recognized radio show in it's scope. As wikipedia policy states: '''"Article topics are required to be notable, or "worthy of notice." Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things like fame, importance, or the popularity of a topic—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject"''' , food for thought. I am going to work on other articles while I continue to work on this one. Your encouragement is certainly appreciated more than you know.  [[User:Armorbearer777|Armorbearer777]] ([[User talk:Armorbearer777|talk]]) 04:39, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
530802 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530801 +++$+++ 530801 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.262091840E09 +++$+++ I have encountered that problem with other Christian music topics, so I understand. I made an article for [[Christian Music Central]], a Christian magazine, and it was nominated for deletion a few days later. I was accused of [[WP:SPAM|creating spam]] even though I had nothing to do with the company. It was impossible to find [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that talked about it. So I've taken some lumps too. You can read the deletion discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Christian Music Central]]. This happened after I was here almost 2 years and about 8 months before I became an admin (which means I was already well-respected at the time), so it can happen to '''anyone'''. I enjoy Skillet and especially Flyleaf. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I have encountered that problem with other Christian music topics, so I understand. I made an article for [[Christian Music Central]], a Christian magazine, and it was nominated for deletion a few days later. I was accused of [[WP:SPAM|creating spam]] even though I had nothing to do with the company. It was impossible to find [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that talked about it. So I've taken some lumps too. You can read the deletion discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Music Central]]. This happened after I was here almost 2 years and about 8 months before I became an admin (which means I was already well-respected at the time), so it can happen to '''anyone'''. I enjoy Skillet and especially Flyleaf. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:04, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
530803 +++$+++ Armorbearer777 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530801 +++$+++ 530802 +++$+++ 2009-12-31 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.262306820E09 +++$+++ TY for that!  My musical tastes seem to lean more toward [[Non-commercial]] radio, which I find very culturally important, but very hard to reference. I don't mind Skillet and Flyleaf but I am the kind of guy that always root for the \"underdogs\"!  Please see my article DRAFT on in my sand box for Christian Metal Radio.  For now it looks like it may be accepted on the [[Christian Metal]] page, but I would one day liek to see it stand on it's own.  I am a LONG TIME wiki reader, but very NEW at the wiki editing.  especially the protocal.  I am learning.  i did manage to make some VERY GOOD edits on [[Bikers for Christ]] that seem as though they are going to stand.  I am getting the hang of it.  On another note, [[The Full Armor of God Broadcast]] has informed me that they do have some notable press in some college newspapers and a Christian metal magazine.  However, it cannot be referenced online.  All they can do is scan them and host them on their website.  But woul'd that be a [[WP:RS]]??  +++$+++ :: TY for that!  My musical tastes seem to lean more toward [[Non-commercial]] radio, which I find very culturally important, but very hard to reference. I don't mind Skillet and Flyleaf but I am the kind of guy that always root for the "underdogs"!  Please see my article DRAFT on in my sand box for Christian Metal Radio.  For now it looks like it may be accepted on the [[Christian Metal]] page, but I would one day liek to see it stand on it's own.  I am a LONG TIME wiki reader, but very NEW at the wiki editing.  especially the protocal.  I am learning.  i did manage to make some VERY GOOD edits on [[Bikers for Christ]] that seem as though they are going to stand.  I am getting the hang of it.  On another note, [[The Full Armor of God Broadcast]] has informed me that they do have some notable press in some college newspapers and a Christian metal magazine.  However, it cannot be referenced online.  All they can do is scan them and host them on their website.  But woul'd that be a [[WP:RS]]?? [[User:Armorbearer777|Armorbearer777]] ([[User talk:Armorbearer777|talk]]) 16:47, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
530804 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530801 +++$+++ 530801 +++$+++ 2009-12-27 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.261970280E09 +++$+++ Please remove the image if you think it's wrong. Feel free to edit the description on Commons. It would probably need to remain on Commons since old photographs of ships are encyclopedic (even if it's not the right ship). I would photoshop it out the graphic on the PD image before using it. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Please remove the image if you think it's wrong. Feel free to edit the description on Commons. It would probably need to remain on Commons since old photographs of ships are encyclopedic (even if it's not the right ship). I would photoshop it out the graphic on the PD image before using it. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 19:18, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
530805 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530801 +++$+++ 530804 +++$+++ 2009-12-28 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.262003220E09 +++$+++ Where do you find the 1200 passengers info? The comment on the county National Register article says that 60 died, and this source (where the picture came from) [http:\/\/www3.gendisasters.com\/wisconsin\/6249\/port-washington-wi-steamer-niagara-burns-sep-1856] has reference which put the number of deaths between 50 and hundreds. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Where do you find the 1200 passengers info? The comment on the county National Register article says that 60 died, and this source (where the picture came from) [http://www3.gendisasters.com/wisconsin/6249/port-washington-wi-steamer-niagara-burns-sep-1856] has reference which put the number of deaths between 50 and hundreds. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:27, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
530806 +++$+++ Freekee +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530801 +++$+++ 530805 +++$+++ 2009-12-28 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.262004780E09 +++$+++ Oops, I meant 120 passengers. But at second look, the article says 170. Yes, the photo should stay in the Commons, but the description should be changed. What about the file name? - +++$+++ :::Oops, I meant 120 passengers. But at second look, the article says 170. Yes, the photo should stay in the Commons, but the description should be changed. What about the file name? -[[User:Freekee|Freekee]] ([[User talk:Freekee|talk]]) 04:53, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
530807 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530801 +++$+++ 530806 +++$+++ 2009-12-28 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.262005140E09 +++$+++ You can change the description - it's just like the English Wikipedian and your login should work there with the unified login (see [[Wikipedia:Unified login]]) if you haven't done so already. What would you have the image name changed too? I can do admin maintenance on Commons. Are you sure that this is not the right ship? I bet hundreds of people would fit on board. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::You can change the description - it's just like the English Wikipedian and your login should work there with the unified login (see [[Wikipedia:Unified login]]) if you haven't done so already. What would you have the image name changed too? I can do admin maintenance on Commons. Are you sure that this is not the right ship? I bet hundreds of people would fit on board. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
530808 +++$+++ Freekee +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530801 +++$+++ 530807 +++$+++ 2009-12-28 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.262058540E09 +++$+++ I'm not certain what to change it to. That's why I was hoping you'd do it. :-) I've got some pics to upload, so I'll take care of it later tonight. The article says our Niagara was a side-wheeler, and I found two other pictures in articles related to our ship that match each other and the description. I also found mention of half a dozen other Niagaras, so I think it's likely that they often get confused. Also, underwater photos and captions of the wreck at one website mention a diamond-shaped walking beam, which is seen on these other pictures I've got. My pics aren't photos, though, they're drawings, so they're not the best resource, but they're all I can find at the moment. - +++$+++ :::::I'm not certain what to change it to. That's why I was hoping you'd do it. :-) I've got some pics to upload, so I'll take care of it later tonight. The article says our Niagara was a side-wheeler, and I found two other pictures in articles related to our ship that match each other and the description. I also found mention of half a dozen other Niagaras, so I think it's likely that they often get confused. Also, underwater photos and captions of the wreck at one website mention a diamond-shaped walking beam, which is seen on these other pictures I've got. My pics aren't photos, though, they're drawings, so they're not the best resource, but they're all I can find at the moment. -[[User:Freekee|Freekee]] ([[User talk:Freekee|talk]]) 19:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

6515 +++$+++ NortyNort +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311526860E09 +++$+++ Would you mind telling me what it says on [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:OkukubiDamCornerstone.jpg this cornerstone]. In particular, what day did construction begin? Thanks.-- +++$+++ Would you mind telling me what it says on [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:OkukubiDamCornerstone.jpg this cornerstone]. In particular, what day did construction begin? Thanks.--[[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]]  <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 10:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
6516 +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6515 +++$+++ 6515 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.312062780E09 +++$+++ Actually, contrary to what the caption in the Commons Description section states, the cornerstone does NOT record the exact date. The date given is 2011 February \"fortunate day\". It is common practice on many monuments of this nature, only to state \"fortunate day\" (i.e. \"lucky day\"); the exact date of which may be determined by astrology, divination, or some other means. -- +++$+++ : Actually, contrary to what the caption in the Commons Description section states, the cornerstone does NOT record the exact date. The date given is 2011 February "fortunate day". It is common practice on many monuments of this nature, only to state "fortunate day" (i.e. "lucky day"); the exact date of which may be determined by astrology, divination, or some other means. --[[User:MChew|MChew]] ([[User talk:MChew#top|talk]]) 14:53, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
6517 +++$+++ NortyNort +++$+++ MChew +++$+++ 6515 +++$+++ 6516 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.312105140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the translation. That reporter also titled that article in the sense that the dam was complete when it was far from it.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the translation. That reporter also titled that article in the sense that the dam was complete when it was far from it.--[[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]]  <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 02:39, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

268661 +++$+++ Qst +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268661 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-24 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.224913680E09 +++$+++ Cheers for the fixes you made on [[The Father, the Son, and the Holy Fonz]] - its been a fantastic help. Cheers, :)  +++$+++ Cheers for the fixes you made on [[The Father, the Son, and the Holy Fonz]] - its been a fantastic help. Cheers, :) [[User:Qst|Qst]] ([[User talk:Qst|talk]]) 22:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
268662 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268661 +++$+++ 268661 +++$+++ 2008-10-25 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.224918840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the thanks!  &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks for the thanks!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

44777 +++$+++ Ryulong +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ 44777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-23 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.277339340E09 +++$+++ The song is \"Manifesto\" (the words are in bold lettering on the cover) and the third parameter in {{tl|nihongo}} is for the romaji of the subject in the 2nd parameter. If it's a song, this is not where the English name of the song goes.\u2014 +++$+++ The song is "Manifesto" (the words are in bold lettering on the cover) and the third parameter in {{tl|nihongo}} is for the romaji of the subject in the 2nd parameter. If it's a song, this is not where the English name of the song goes.—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>]]) 17:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
44778 +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ 44777 +++$+++ 44777 +++$+++ 2010-06-24 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.277374920E09 +++$+++ Oh, I didn't realise it was on the cover. -- +++$+++ :Oh, I didn't realise it was on the cover. --[[User:Prosperosity|Prosperosity]] ([[User talk:Prosperosity#top|talk]]) 03:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
44779 +++$+++ Ryulong +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ 44777 +++$+++ 44778 +++$+++ 2010-06-24 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.277375640E09 +++$+++ I'm pretty sure that the fact that \"I Spy I Spy\" is a collab between Superfly and Jet makes it notable, as does the fact that \"Manifesto\" is the group's sophomore single, and the last one featuring Tabo. The fact that they are official singles by the group means that they are notable per [[WP:MUSIC]].\u2014 +++$+++ ::I'm pretty sure that the fact that "I Spy I Spy" is a collab between Superfly and Jet makes it notable, as does the fact that "Manifesto" is the group's sophomore single, and the last one featuring Tabo. The fact that they are official singles by the group means that they are notable per [[WP:MUSIC]].—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>]]) 03:34, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

268665 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-11 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.223768280E09 +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, you seem to be pretty active at GAN so I figured you might be knowledgeable on this.  Anyway, an article I have worked on ([[Gunnerkrigg Court]]) is up for review and 5 days ago a user put it on hold because there were two <nowiki>{{fact}}<\/nowiki> tags, saying he would start the review once the tags were cleared up.  I fixed those issues on the same day, but the user has not begun a review in the 5 days since then; I've sent him a message asking if there is anything else I should do, but have not gotten a response in several days, even though that user has been actively posting in other areas.  I thought about removing the \"on hold\" marker at GAN so that the article could get back in line to be reviewed, but I'm not sure if that would be rude to the user who originally said he would do a review.  Just wondering if you have any thoughts on that matter.  Thanks, &mdash; +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, you seem to be pretty active at GAN so I figured you might be knowledgeable on this.  Anyway, an article I have worked on ([[Gunnerkrigg Court]]) is up for review and 5 days ago a user put it on hold because there were two <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags, saying he would start the review once the tags were cleared up.  I fixed those issues on the same day, but the user has not begun a review in the 5 days since then; I've sent him a message asking if there is anything else I should do, but have not gotten a response in several days, even though that user has been actively posting in other areas.  I thought about removing the "on hold" marker at GAN so that the article could get back in line to be reviewed, but I'm not sure if that would be rude to the user who originally said he would do a review.  Just wondering if you have any thoughts on that matter.  Thanks, &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]<sup><small>(&nbsp;'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''&nbsp;)</small></sup> 16:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
268666 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.224058860E09 +++$+++ Answered on [[User:Politizer|Politizer]]'s talk page. &mdash; +++$+++ :Answered on [[User:Politizer|Politizer]]'s talk page. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:21, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
268667 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.224071820E09 +++$+++ Oh, no problem; thanks for your comments!  I've just gone ahead and put the article back in line for GAR; I'm pretty patient, as I know it can take a while for articles to get reviewed and I personally haven't really been pulling my weight (I've only reviewed two other articles) so I'm not in a position to rush anyone else.  Best, &mdash; +++$+++ :Oh, no problem; thanks for your comments!  I've just gone ahead and put the article back in line for GAR; I'm pretty patient, as I know it can take a while for articles to get reviewed and I personally haven't really been pulling my weight (I've only reviewed two other articles) so I'm not in a position to rush anyone else.  Best, &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]<sup><small>(&nbsp;'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''&nbsp;)</small></sup> 04:57, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
268668 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 268667 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.224715560E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, I left some comments at [[Talk:Gunnerkrigg Court#On hold]] regarding the GA review and possible improvements.  Thanks! &mdash; +++$+++ ::Just to let you know, I left some comments at [[Talk:Gunnerkrigg Court#On hold]] regarding the GA review and possible improvements.  Thanks! &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 15:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
268669 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 268667 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.225056720E09 +++$+++ Hey, I don't mean to bug you, I'm just sending you a message in case you missed my last one.  If you've already seen my message and it's still on your to-do list, you can ignore this!  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Hey, I don't mean to bug you, I'm just sending you a message in case you missed my last one.  If you've already seen my message and it's still on your to-do list, you can ignore this!  &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 14:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
268670 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 268669 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.225057560E09 +++$+++ Sorry! I did not see your first message. Sometimes when I get that \"message flash\" there is more than one message and I do not realize it. Even to find this message of yours, I had do do a find of \"bug you\" as I could not find it by just scanning my talk page! I will look at [[Talk:Gunnerkrigg Court#On hold]] today.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Sorry! I did not see your first message. Sometimes when I get that "message flash" there is more than one message and I do not realize it. Even to find this message of yours, I had do do a find of "bug you" as I could not find it by just scanning my talk page! I will look at [[Talk:Gunnerkrigg Court#On hold]] today.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
268671 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 268670 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.225104600E09 +++$+++ No problem!  Thanks so much for all your help and advice cleaning up the article! &mdash; +++$+++ ::::No problem!  Thanks so much for all your help and advice cleaning up the article! &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 03:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
268672 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 268671 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.225105080E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. I just passed it as GA. Hope any Iso is removed thought. Congratulations!  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::You are welcome. I just passed it as GA. Hope any Iso is removed thought. Congratulations!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
268673 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 268672 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.225105380E09 +++$+++ Sure, I can fix the dates!  Should I remove ISO numbers from accessdates as well, or just from the main dates? &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::Sure, I can fix the dates!  Should I remove ISO numbers from accessdates as well, or just from the main dates? &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 04:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
268674 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 268673 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.225105560E09 +++$+++ Remove them everywhere. I think the vast majority is against them.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::Remove them everywhere. I think the vast majority is against them.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:06, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
268675 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 268674 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.225106340E09 +++$+++ Done.  All the accessdates turned into redlinks...I guess I'll just wait until the people working in the <nowiki>{{cite}}<\/nowiki> templates change the syntax about that? &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::Done.  All the accessdates turned into redlinks...I guess I'll just wait until the people working in the <nowiki>{{cite}}</nowiki> templates change the syntax about that? &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 04:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
268676 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.225108020E09 +++$+++ Humm. That's not good. Preferably they should not be linked at all. Perhaps you should change them back until we straighten this out -- there are various talk pages plus the village pump technical that may be able to answer. Too tired not but will look into it tomorrow.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::Humm. That's not good. Preferably they should not be linked at all. Perhaps you should change them back until we straighten this out -- there are various talk pages plus the village pump technical that may be able to answer. Too tired not but will look into it tomorrow.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:47, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
268677 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.225109100E09 +++$+++ I just checked the template documentation, it looks like it will unlink them if I just replace all the accessdate= parameters with accessmonthday= and accessyear= . &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::::I just checked the template documentation, it looks like it will unlink them if I just replace all the accessdate= parameters with accessmonthday= and accessyear= . &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 05:05, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
268678 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.225109820E09 +++$+++ Done!  Looks much nicer now. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::::Done!  Looks much nicer now. &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 05:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
268679 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 268665 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.225073700E09 +++$+++ O.K. I reverted it. &mdash; +++$+++ : O.K. I reverted it. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:15, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

525375 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-29 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.183165200E09 +++$+++ Hi there Arcadian. I recently stumbled across [[Coomassie blue]] in {{cl|Chemical pages needing a structure drawing}}, and wondered whether you were aware of [[Coomassie]]? I haven't redirected Coomassie blue because I thought maybe Coomassie should be merged into it. Any thoughts?  +++$+++ Hi there Arcadian. I recently stumbled across [[Coomassie blue]] in {{cl|Chemical pages needing a structure drawing}}, and wondered whether you were aware of [[Coomassie]]? I haven't redirected Coomassie blue because I thought maybe Coomassie should be merged into it. Any thoughts? [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 18:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
525376 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525375 +++$+++ 525375 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.183535160E09 +++$+++ It does look like a duplicate. Sorry for my error. -- +++$+++ :It does look like a duplicate. Sorry for my error. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 00:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

530813 +++$+++ Andrew Jameson +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530813 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-29 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.262123040E09 +++$+++ So I added a couple things to the [[IXL Historical Museum]], particularly from the state HAL site describing the main building.  I've recently been slowly working through some NRHP lists in the UP, specifically [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Keweenaw County, Michigan|Keweenaw County]], [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Houghton County, Michigan|Houghton County]], and [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Marquette County, Michigan|Marquette County]], if you want more inspiration :).  +++$+++ So I added a couple things to the [[IXL Historical Museum]], particularly from the state HAL site describing the main building.  I've recently been slowly working through some NRHP lists in the UP, specifically [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Keweenaw County, Michigan|Keweenaw County]], [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Houghton County, Michigan|Houghton County]], and [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Marquette County, Michigan|Marquette County]], if you want more inspiration :). [[User:Andrew Jameson|Andrew Jameson]] ([[User talk:Andrew Jameson|talk]]) 13:44, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
530814 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530813 +++$+++ 530813 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.262123460E09 +++$+++ I have more inspiration than time! I'm from eastern Wisconsin, and I've photographed many hundreds of places on the register throughout the entire eastern half of Wisconsin. I'd only work on articles where I took a photo since I can afford to be so choosy. I have visited every county in the UP in my life; most were around 10 years ago when I had more vacation time at my previous employer. The Keewenaw Peninsula was my favorite part of the UP. I'm amazed at how poorly known that area is after being awed in its beauty. I went to the IXL Museum this past summer while spending a weekend at my uncle's nearby cabin. The photos looked good even though it was a dreary day that turned into rain while we were there. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I have more inspiration than time! I'm from eastern Wisconsin, and I've photographed many hundreds of places on the register throughout the entire eastern half of Wisconsin. I'd only work on articles where I took a photo since I can afford to be so choosy. I have visited every county in the UP in my life; most were around 10 years ago when I had more vacation time at my previous employer. The Keewenaw Peninsula was my favorite part of the UP. I'm amazed at how poorly known that area is after being awed in its beauty. I went to the IXL Museum this past summer while spending a weekend at my uncle's nearby cabin. The photos looked good even though it was a dreary day that turned into rain while we were there. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:51, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
530815 +++$+++ Andrew Jameson +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530813 +++$+++ 530814 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.262130360E09 +++$+++ And you might want to take a look now; I added a bunch of historical information on the company.  +++$+++ ::And you might want to take a look now; I added a bunch of historical information on the company. [[User:Andrew Jameson|Andrew Jameson]] ([[User talk:Andrew Jameson|talk]]) 15:46, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

6531 +++$+++ Swanny18 +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-03 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.246633800E09 +++$+++ PS: And don\u2019t remove tags that say there\u2019s a problem with an article if you are not prepared to do anything to fix the problem.  +++$+++ PS: And don’t remove tags that say there’s a problem with an article if you are not prepared to do anything to fix the problem. [[User:Swanny18|Swanny18]] ([[User talk:Swanny18|talk]]) 08:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
6532 +++$+++ Swanny18 +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6531 +++$+++ 6531 +++$+++ 2009-07-05 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.246860120E09 +++$+++ Try reading what I actually said, and try reading the revision histories; The aggravation started at your end.  +++$+++ :Try reading what I actually said, and try reading the revision histories; The aggravation started at your end. [[User:Swanny18|Swanny18]] ([[User talk:Swanny18|talk]]) 23:02, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

530823 +++$+++ Schwede66 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530823 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-10 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.263120240E09 +++$+++ I like your signature, with its separate links to your user and talk pages. Are you signing by typing the usual four tildes (if so, what creates those links?), or are you pasting it as wikitext, including date and time? I'd appreciate being let into your tricks.  +++$+++ I like your signature, with its separate links to your user and talk pages. Are you signing by typing the usual four tildes (if so, what creates those links?), or are you pasting it as wikitext, including date and time? I'd appreciate being let into your tricks. [[User:Schwede66|Schwede66]] ([[User talk:Schwede66|talk]]) 02:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
530824 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530823 +++$+++ 530823 +++$+++ 2010-01-10 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.263123300E09 +++$+++ I'm happy to help! I do sign with the normal 4 tildes. The key is to set your preferences to not use the default signature. You click on the \"My Preferences\" link in the upper right. Then you scroll down to the \"Signature\" (so you stay on the User Profile tab). The key is to add a check mark to the \"Sign my name exactly as shown\" box. Then you add the HTML code or wikitext to do what you want for your name. I had classes on HTML, but you can copy my idea. You can find my signature by reading the code that is placed at my signature when you edit this section. A tip is 3 ' means bold. The date is automatically added at the end. So my code is <nowiki>'''<font color=\"#000000\">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]<\/font><font color=\"#FFCC00\">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]<\/font>'''<\/nowiki>. While you're in the preferences, I highly recommend adding the a \"Cite\" button to your toolbar on the edit window - it's slick like butter! Click the \"Gadgets\" tab, and add a check mark to \"refTools, adds a \"cite\" button to the editing toolbar for quick and easy addition of commonly used citation templates.\" Just place the insertion point where you want to add the citation, click the CITE button, and paste in the URL, article name, author, etc. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I'm happy to help! I do sign with the normal 4 tildes. The key is to set your preferences to not use the default signature. You click on the "My Preferences" link in the upper right. Then you scroll down to the "Signature" (so you stay on the User Profile tab). The key is to add a check mark to the "Sign my name exactly as shown" box. Then you add the HTML code or wikitext to do what you want for your name. I had classes on HTML, but you can copy my idea. You can find my signature by reading the code that is placed at my signature when you edit this section. A tip is 3 ' means bold. The date is automatically added at the end. So my code is <nowiki>'''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>'''</nowiki>. While you're in the preferences, I highly recommend adding the a "Cite" button to your toolbar on the edit window - it's slick like butter! Click the "Gadgets" tab, and add a check mark to "refTools, adds a "cite" button to the editing toolbar for quick and easy addition of commonly used citation templates." Just place the insertion point where you want to add the citation, click the CITE button, and paste in the URL, article name, author, etc. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:35, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
530825 +++$+++ Schwede66 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530823 +++$+++ 530824 +++$+++ 2010-01-10 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.263124560E09 +++$+++ Sweet. Will give this a go. That was a speedy reply - much appreciated. +++$+++ ::Sweet. Will give this a go. That was a speedy reply - much appreciated.[[User:Schwede66|Schwede66]] ([[User talk:Schwede66|talk]]) 03:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
530826 +++$+++ Schwede66 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530823 +++$+++ 530825 +++$+++ 2010-01-16 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.263712500E09 +++$+++ It's a shame that the 'cite' tool does not work with the 'enhanced editing toolbar', because I really like that. But I've gone back to the old toolbar now, as I cite a lot (as one should!). '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::It's a shame that the 'cite' tool does not work with the 'enhanced editing toolbar', because I really like that. But I've gone back to the old toolbar now, as I cite a lot (as one should!). '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Schwede66|Schwede]]</font><font color="#FF4500">[[User talk:Schwede66|66]]</font>''' 23:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

6536 +++$+++ TheRetroGuy +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6536 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-10 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.255237440E09 +++$+++ Hi. I've removed his copied text again, but put in a permenant link to it in your report so it can still be viewed. I've also linked to the article's history. Hope this is ok. If he carries on it might be worth taking this to [[WP:ANI|ANI]] for them to deal with. Cheers  +++$+++ Hi. I've removed his copied text again, but put in a permenant link to it in your report so it can still be viewed. I've also linked to the article's history. Hope this is ok. If he carries on it might be worth taking this to [[WP:ANI|ANI]] for them to deal with. Cheers [[User:TheRetroGuy|TheRetroGuy]] ([[User talk:TheRetroGuy|talk]]) 22:04, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
6537 +++$+++ TheRetroGuy +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6536 +++$+++ 6536 +++$+++ 2009-10-10 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.255237980E09 +++$+++ Actually, given the extent of the problem I think I'll take it to ANI now. I'll copy everything over from the copyvio talk page and see what happens. Cheers  +++$+++ :Actually, given the extent of the problem I think I'll take it to ANI now. I'll copy everything over from the copyvio talk page and see what happens. Cheers [[User:TheRetroGuy|TheRetroGuy]] ([[User talk:TheRetroGuy|talk]]) 22:13, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
6538 +++$+++ TheRetroGuy +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6536 +++$+++ 6537 +++$+++ 2009-10-10 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.255238580E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#User:Ivankinsman systemic copyright vio|Discussion now open]]. Cheers  +++$+++ ::[[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Ivankinsman systemic copyright vio|Discussion now open]]. Cheers [[User:TheRetroGuy|TheRetroGuy]] ([[User talk:TheRetroGuy|talk]]) 22:23, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

306924 +++$+++ Shell_Kinney +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 306924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-25 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.156557120E09 +++$+++ I've blocked the User06201 account for a short period of time.  If your fairly certain that he's the same IP vandal and the other accounts are his, you might want to file a [[WP:RFCU|request for checkuser]] so he can be dealt with in a more permanent fashion. Shell <sup> +++$+++ I've blocked the User06201 account for a short period of time.  If your fairly certain that he's the same IP vandal and the other accounts are his, you might want to file a [[WP:RFCU|request for checkuser]] so he can be dealt with in a more permanent fashion. Shell <sup>[[User_talk:Shell_Kinney|babelfish]]</sup> 18:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
306925 +++$+++ Shell_Kinney +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 306924 +++$+++ 306924 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.156557480E09 +++$+++ I actually did see the evidence page and it does appear to be the same person or his twin brother ;)  If you get the checkuser (I'm assuming the IP had a long vandalism history but haven't checked myself) it should be enough to indef block his accounts on site, which would considerably lessen the harassment you're getting.  If he starts up again, just put another note on [[WP:PAIN]] and he'll quickly be subject to much longer blocks. Shell <sup> +++$+++ :I actually did see the evidence page and it does appear to be the same person or his twin brother ;)  If you get the checkuser (I'm assuming the IP had a long vandalism history but haven't checked myself) it should be enough to indef block his accounts on site, which would considerably lessen the harassment you're getting.  If he starts up again, just put another note on [[WP:PAIN]] and he'll quickly be subject to much longer blocks. Shell <sup>[[User_talk:Shell_Kinney|babelfish]]</sup> 18:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
306926 +++$+++ Shell_Kinney +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 306924 +++$+++ 306925 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.156563060E09 +++$+++ Centrx caught something I didn't -- he used the accounts and the IP to move around warnings and archive them.  He's indef blocked two of the accounts and blocked the IP from editing anonymously for 2 months.  At least now, he's stuck to one account which should be easier to manage. Shell <sup> +++$+++ ::Centrx caught something I didn't -- he used the accounts and the IP to move around warnings and archive them.  He's indef blocked two of the accounts and blocked the IP from editing anonymously for 2 months.  At least now, he's stuck to one account which should be easier to manage. Shell <sup>[[User_talk:Shell_Kinney|babelfish]]</sup> 20:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

6539 +++$+++ Aymatth2 +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6539 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-10 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.257843600E09 +++$+++ Why? It illustrates the popular view of the idea of training scent hounds by dragging a red herring through the woods, from an extremely important source on the evolution of the English language. And it is self-referential, illustrating the idiomatic use of a [[Red Herring]]. How is this unrelated trivia?  +++$+++ Why? It illustrates the popular view of the idea of training scent hounds by dragging a red herring through the woods, from an extremely important source on the evolution of the English language. And it is self-referential, illustrating the idiomatic use of a [[Red Herring]]. How is this unrelated trivia? [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 01:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
6540 +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6539 +++$+++ 6539 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.257847320E09 +++$+++ Copied and followed up on the article talk page.  +++$+++ :Copied and followed up on the article talk page. [[User:Green Cardamom|Green Cardamom]] ([[User talk:Green Cardamom#top|talk]]) 02:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

530828 +++$+++ Schwede66 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-10 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.263195600E09 +++$+++ You've commented on possibly obtaining permission from the designer of the [[Cycle Friendly Awards]] trophies for the [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_January_2|DYK]]. I'd just like to draw your attention to the fact that the designer has now commented on the DYK nomination, giving his permission to use the photo of the trophy. I hope that process works. +++$+++ You've commented on possibly obtaining permission from the designer of the [[Cycle Friendly Awards]] trophies for the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_January_2|DYK]]. I'd just like to draw your attention to the fact that the designer has now commented on the DYK nomination, giving his permission to use the photo of the trophy. I hope that process works.[[User:Schwede66|Schwede66]] ([[User talk:Schwede66|talk]]) 23:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
530829 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530828 +++$+++ 530828 +++$+++ 2010-01-11 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.263208500E09 +++$+++ It will be up to whoever selects the image for the group. Remember that there are almost always more images than what are needed. My suggested images don't make it very often, like [[:File:IXLMuseumHermanstownMichigan.jpg|this one]] in the past week. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :It will be up to whoever selects the image for the group. Remember that there are almost always more images than what are needed. My suggested images don't make it very often, like [[:File:IXLMuseumHermanstownMichigan.jpg|this one]] in the past week. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:15, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

6541 +++$+++ Ginsengbomb +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-10 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.268211240E09 +++$+++ Calling someone a \"red-link newbie\" and baselessly accusing them of sockpuppetry for vote stacking purposes, along with your other insinuations in the above conversation, is close to a \"personal attack.\" Some might actually consider it to be one. I personally am a fan of thick skins on here, so I don't (you're not exactly flying into a psychotic rage, hehe), but I want to warn you now because the AfD is not a venue for your strange slander against another editor. It is for discussing the relative merits of the article at hand. If you have evidence that JBsupreme is doing what you say he's doing (and considering I'm the only other person who's voted thus far, if he's vote stacking he's doing an amazingly poor job of it), contact an Admin, don't fling accusations in an AfD.<p>Additionally, as I mention at the AfD, the \"red-link newbie\" you are talking to has more than 10 times as many edits as you, has been a registered editor for almost a year longer than you, and is a frequent contributor to AfD. So...you know...maybe you should just quit the attack\/well-poisoning stuff while you're behind. Just my two cents.  +++$+++ Calling someone a "red-link newbie" and baselessly accusing them of sockpuppetry for vote stacking purposes, along with your other insinuations in the above conversation, is close to a "personal attack." Some might actually consider it to be one. I personally am a fan of thick skins on here, so I don't (you're not exactly flying into a psychotic rage, hehe), but I want to warn you now because the AfD is not a venue for your strange slander against another editor. It is for discussing the relative merits of the article at hand. If you have evidence that JBsupreme is doing what you say he's doing (and considering I'm the only other person who's voted thus far, if he's vote stacking he's doing an amazingly poor job of it), contact an Admin, don't fling accusations in an AfD.<p>Additionally, as I mention at the AfD, the "red-link newbie" you are talking to has more than 10 times as many edits as you, has been a registered editor for almost a year longer than you, and is a frequent contributor to AfD. So...you know...maybe you should just quit the attack/well-poisoning stuff while you're behind. Just my two cents. [[User:Ginsengbomb|<font color=#AAAAFF>'''''ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ''''']][[User talk:Ginsengbomb|<font color=#D50000>bomb</font color>]] 00:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
6542 +++$+++ Phantomsteve +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6541 +++$+++ 6541 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.268791620E09 +++$+++ If you still want to present your \"proof\" of these allegations to an admin, then you are welcome to send me your proof using [[Special:EmailUser\/Phantomsteve]]. I am an admin (you can verify it [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&limit=1&username=Phantomsteve here]) and will consider your allegations and bring them to the notice at the appropriate venue. -- ''''' +++$+++ * If you still want to present your "proof" of these allegations to an admin, then you are welcome to send me your proof using [[Special:EmailUser/Phantomsteve]]. I am an admin (you can verify it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&limit=1&username=Phantomsteve here]) and will consider your allegations and bring them to the notice at the appropriate venue. -- '''''[[User:Phantomsteve|<font color="#307D7E">Phantom</font><font color="#55CAFA">Steve</font>]]'''''/[[User talk:Phantomsteve|<font color="#008000">talk</font>]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Phantomsteve|<font color="#000080">contribs</font>]]\ 19:07, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

530831 +++$+++ Olaf Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530831 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-14 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.263537600E09 +++$+++ Hi there Royalbroil. I just wanted to say a (somewhat belated) thanks for your comment at my RfA. One of the nicest things about the process was seeing how many editors I respect, including those at DYK, have actually noticed and remembered my edits. I had actually been toying with the idea of reaquainting myself with current DYK guidelines enough to lend a hand when I have the time, so perhaps we'll have the chance to work together again as you say. Best wishes,  +++$+++ Hi there Royalbroil. I just wanted to say a (somewhat belated) thanks for your comment at my RfA. One of the nicest things about the process was seeing how many editors I respect, including those at DYK, have actually noticed and remembered my edits. I had actually been toying with the idea of reaquainting myself with current DYK guidelines enough to lend a hand when I have the time, so perhaps we'll have the chance to work together again as you say. Best wishes, [[User:Olaf Davis|Olaf Davis]] ([[User talk:Olaf Davis|talk]]) 22:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
530832 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530831 +++$+++ 530831 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.263558900E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. That was one of the big surprises in my RFA too - seeing how many people that I really respected who had actually knew and me and respected what I had done. Congrats! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. That was one of the big surprises in my RFA too - seeing how many people that I really respected who had actually knew and me and respected what I had done. Congrats! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

530833 +++$+++ DASHBot +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-15 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.263564660E09 +++$+++ Thanks!-- +++$+++ Thanks!--[[User:DASHBot|DASHBot]] ([[User talk:DASHBot|talk]]) 06:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
530834 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530833 +++$+++ 530833 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.263565260E09 +++$+++ Wow, only three! I've seen a lot more for other people, and I've started many articles (hundreds?)! Herrera's is going to take some mop work to deal with the disambiguation problems with the cut and paste move in the past done by someone else. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Wow, only three! I've seen a lot more for other people, and I've started many articles (hundreds?)! Herrera's is going to take some mop work to deal with the disambiguation problems with the cut and paste move in the past done by someone else. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 06:21, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

536003 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 536003 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-28 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.188309000E09 +++$+++ I do not understand why the stubs were removed in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Harris_and_Selwyn_Theaters&curid=11221655&diff=153974478&oldid=141204535 this edit].  Please reply at my talk page.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ I do not understand why the stubs were removed in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harris_and_Selwyn_Theaters&curid=11221655&diff=153974478&oldid=141204535 this edit].  Please reply at my talk page.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 06:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
536004 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 536003 +++$+++ 536003 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.188341040E09 +++$+++ As I understand the purpose of stubs, they organize articles into categories.  When we at [[WP:CHICAGO]] choose articles for [[WP:CHICOTW]], we look for stubs so we would quite possibly look in the category created by {{tl|Chicago-stub}}.  However, persons at [[WP:Illinois]] might look for an article to work on in a category created by {{tl|Illinois-struct-stub}} if they were in the mood to work on an Illinois building.  In this sense the Illinois tag is not redundant.  Similarly, since neither {{tl|US-theatre-stub}} nor {{tl|theat-struct-stub}} is a subcategory of the other they are not redundant and you will create wholes in the system by removing such tags before articles have gotten enough attention to no longer be stubs.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :As I understand the purpose of stubs, they organize articles into categories.  When we at [[WP:CHICAGO]] choose articles for [[WP:CHICOTW]], we look for stubs so we would quite possibly look in the category created by {{tl|Chicago-stub}}.  However, persons at [[WP:Illinois]] might look for an article to work on in a category created by {{tl|Illinois-struct-stub}} if they were in the mood to work on an Illinois building.  In this sense the Illinois tag is not redundant.  Similarly, since neither {{tl|US-theatre-stub}} nor {{tl|theat-struct-stub}} is a subcategory of the other they are not redundant and you will create wholes in the system by removing such tags before articles have gotten enough attention to no longer be stubs.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 15:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
536005 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 536003 +++$+++ 536004 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.188341160E09 +++$+++ It looks like one cat has been depopulated.  I hope this was not your efforts based on your previous arguments.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::It looks like one cat has been depopulated.  I hope this was not your efforts based on your previous arguments.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 15:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
536006 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 536003 +++$+++ 536005 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.188341760E09 +++$+++ There is nothing in the section to suggest an article should not include {{tl|Illinois-stub}} and {{tl|Chicago-stub}}.  Like I said before they do not overlap. I am going to readd {{tl|Illinois-stub}} and add {{tl|theater-struct-stub}}.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::There is nothing in the section to suggest an article should not include {{tl|Illinois-stub}} and {{tl|Chicago-stub}}.  Like I said before they do not overlap. I am going to readd {{tl|Illinois-stub}} and add {{tl|theater-struct-stub}}.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 15:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
536007 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 536003 +++$+++ 536005 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.188342480E09 +++$+++ My mistake, I meant to add {{tl|Illinois-struct-stub}} which is clearly not a parent category for {{tl|Chicago-stub}}.  I have readded the correct stub.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::My mistake, I meant to add {{tl|Illinois-struct-stub}} which is clearly not a parent category for {{tl|Chicago-stub}}.  I have readded the correct stub.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 16:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
536008 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 536003 +++$+++ 536007 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.188342660E09 +++$+++ Also is {{tl|theater-struct-stub}} a parent or offspring of {{tl|US-theatre-stub}}. --[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::Also is {{tl|theater-struct-stub}} a parent or offspring of {{tl|US-theatre-stub}}. --[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 16:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
536009 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 536003 +++$+++ 536008 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.188342960E09 +++$+++ O.K. I will readd {{tl|US-theat-stub}} as well.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::::O.K. I will readd {{tl|US-theat-stub}} as well.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 16:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
536010 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 536003 +++$+++ 536009 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.188344160E09 +++$+++ You wore me out. You win.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::::You wore me out. You win.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 16:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

268691 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268691 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-27 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.225096320E09 +++$+++ This leads me to think that you could salvage it as some of the books under publications are not using the citation template. Also, perhaps separating the References from the Publications has something to do with it. You do not have a list of clickable references as the [[Albert Speer]] article does. I tried putting {{t1|reflist}} into your article, which usually generates the list of footnotes, but it didn't generate the list. &mdash; +++$+++ This leads me to think that you could salvage it as some of the books under publications are not using the citation template. Also, perhaps separating the References from the Publications has something to do with it. You do not have a list of clickable references as the [[Albert Speer]] article does. I tried putting {{t1|reflist}} into your article, which usually generates the list of footnotes, but it didn't generate the list. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
268692 +++$+++ William Meyer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268691 +++$+++ 268691 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.225098600E09 +++$+++ I will work on this tonight and try to get some clarity on it.  I can certainly fix the obvious problems right away ... overlinking, and the use of Peterson's own material.  I'll get back to you.  Thanks again.  I'm eager to get this fixed ....  +++$+++ :I will work on this tonight and try to get some clarity on it.  I can certainly fix the obvious problems right away ... overlinking, and the use of Peterson's own material.  I'll get back to you.  Thanks again.  I'm eager to get this fixed .... [[User:William Meyer|William Meyer]] ([[User talk:William Meyer|talk]]) 02:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
268693 +++$+++ William Meyer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268691 +++$+++ 268691 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.225105320E09 +++$+++ What do you suggest now?  Thanks for your help  +++$+++ :What do you suggest now?  Thanks for your help [[User:William Meyer|William Meyer]] ([[User talk:William Meyer|talk]]) 04:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
268694 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268691 +++$+++ 268693 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.225142040E09 +++$+++ I think I see the problem now. In [[Albert Speer]], the editor has written the in-text references thus: <nowiki><ref>{{Harvnb|van der Vat|1997|p=60.}}<\/ref><\/nowiki>. He surrounds each one with <nowiki><ref><\/ref><\/nowiki> Whereas, you have written yous this way <nowiki>{{Harv |McNally|2002|p=2}}<\/nowiki>,  If you format them with the <nowiki><ref><\/ref><\/nowiki> and add a footnotes section with {{t1|reflist}} under it,  it will work. I stuck them in the page and it works now! &mdash; +++$+++ ::I think I see the problem now. In [[Albert Speer]], the editor has written the in-text references thus: <nowiki><ref>{{Harvnb|van der Vat|1997|p=60.}}</ref></nowiki>. He surrounds each one with <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> Whereas, you have written yous this way <nowiki>{{Harv |McNally|2002|p=2}}</nowiki>,  If you format them with the <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> and add a footnotes section with {{t1|reflist}} under it,  it will work. I stuck them in the page and it works now! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:14, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
268695 +++$+++ William Meyer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268691 +++$+++ 268694 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.225147140E09 +++$+++ Thank you, thank you, thank you.  I feel so relieved to having this put right.  I am working on several other articles, and I can now use the detailed instructions and corrections you have provided to set the articles right from the beginning.  I am grateful for your spirit of cooperation, and your dogged determination to get to the bottom of things.  It has been a pleasure working with you.  Best wishes.  +++$+++ ::: Thank you, thank you, thank you.  I feel so relieved to having this put right.  I am working on several other articles, and I can now use the detailed instructions and corrections you have provided to set the articles right from the beginning.  I am grateful for your spirit of cooperation, and your dogged determination to get to the bottom of things.  It has been a pleasure working with you.  Best wishes. [[User:William Meyer|William Meyer]] ([[User talk:William Meyer|talk]]) 15:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

530837 +++$+++ Johncoracing48 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-16 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.263644880E09 +++$+++ By the way, have you nominated Alan Kulwicki for FA yet? Please keep me updated on that and let me know if you need any help.-- +++$+++ By the way, have you nominated Alan Kulwicki for FA yet? Please keep me updated on that and let me know if you need any help.--[[User:Johncoracing48|Johncoracing48]] ([[User talk:Johncoracing48|talk]]) 04:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
530838 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530837 +++$+++ 530837 +++$+++ 2010-01-16 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.263645720E09 +++$+++ There's no way that we can figure out someone's real life identity, so no one shouldn't have to worry about that. I'm waiting for [[David Pearson (NASCAR driver)]] to go through Good Article review before I'd think about nominating AK at FA. It'll probably be at least a few weeks. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :There's no way that we can figure out someone's real life identity, so no one shouldn't have to worry about that. I'm waiting for [[David Pearson (NASCAR driver)]] to go through Good Article review before I'd think about nominating AK at FA. It'll probably be at least a few weeks. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

530839 +++$+++ Daniel Christensen +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-20 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.263990360E09 +++$+++ I am working on it; scroll to list four or fourth list on my userpage; it's a subpage of mine. I used to think it refered to tractors that were meant to be able to straddle rows and have narrow tires but it's actually ''any'' crop farmed in rows and ''any'' tractor that does the farming.  +++$+++ I am working on it; scroll to list four or fourth list on my userpage; it's a subpage of mine. I used to think it refered to tractors that were meant to be able to straddle rows and have narrow tires but it's actually ''any'' crop farmed in rows and ''any'' tractor that does the farming. [[User:Daniel Christensen|Daniel Christensen]] ([[User talk:Daniel Christensen|talk]]) 04:26, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
530840 +++$+++ Daniel Christensen +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530839 +++$+++ 530839 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.263992820E09 +++$+++ Well [[row crop]] with no capitalization redirects to crop; try to find any good source on row crop tractors or add some original research to my subpage.  +++$+++ :Well [[row crop]] with no capitalization redirects to crop; try to find any good source on row crop tractors or add some original research to my subpage. [[User:Daniel Christensen|Daniel Christensen]] ([[User talk:Daniel Christensen|talk]]) 05:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

6552 +++$+++ Stephen +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-15 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.292478960E09 +++$+++ Hi, sorry for appearing to slowly edit war, I hadn't checked that it was you who had added in in both times, and for not explaining my rationale. Basically per [[WP:EL#Links normally to be avoided]], point 1 , the information in the linked document should be in the article, if it was ever to get to a better state. So can we copy the information into a section on characters?  It was a great book to read and your information would have helped me keep track! -- +++$+++ Hi, sorry for appearing to slowly edit war, I hadn't checked that it was you who had added in in both times, and for not explaining my rationale. Basically per [[WP:EL#Links normally to be avoided]], point 1 , the information in the linked document should be in the article, if it was ever to get to a better state. So can we copy the information into a section on characters?  It was a great book to read and your information would have helped me keep track! --[[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 21:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
6553 +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6552 +++$+++ 6552 +++$+++ 2010-12-16 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.292545320E09 +++$+++ I think it's copyright (no CC license on the page) so can't copypaste; and the list probably isn't really appropriate for Wikipedia, too many names too long, normally only focus on main characters, unless perhaps if there was a [[List of characters in The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet]] article? We should probably keep the EL, until something comparable on Wikipedia ever made it redundant. It would really be a lot of work to create that list for Wikipedia because many of the descriptions are paraphrased from the book directly and would need to be sourced with quotations to prevent it from being tagged with a copyvio.  +++$+++ :I think it's copyright (no CC license on the page) so can't copypaste; and the list probably isn't really appropriate for Wikipedia, too many names too long, normally only focus on main characters, unless perhaps if there was a [[List of characters in The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet]] article? We should probably keep the EL, until something comparable on Wikipedia ever made it redundant. It would really be a lot of work to create that list for Wikipedia because many of the descriptions are paraphrased from the book directly and would need to be sourced with quotations to prevent it from being tagged with a copyvio. [[User:Green Cardamom|Green Cardamom]] ([[User talk:Green Cardamom#top|talk]]) 16:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
6554 +++$+++ DocMusique +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6552 +++$+++ 6552 +++$+++ 2010-12-17 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.292615460E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much.  I am new to this, so any help would be greatly appreciated. Should I start an Ultraviolets article in my user space? or what exactly do I do for a merge?  +++$+++ *Thank you so much.  I am new to this, so any help would be greatly appreciated. Should I start an Ultraviolets article in my user space? or what exactly do I do for a merge? [[User:DocMusique|Docmusique1]] ([[User talk:DocMusique|talk]]) 11:51, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
6555 +++$+++ DocMusique +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6552 +++$+++ 6552 +++$+++ 2010-12-29 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.293656820E09 +++$+++ Been on holiday, but plan to start the article this weekend!  Will keep you posted! Thanks again for all of your help!  +++$+++ *Been on holiday, but plan to start the article this weekend!  Will keep you posted! Thanks again for all of your help! [[User:DocMusique|Docmusique1]] ([[User talk:DocMusique|talk]]) 13:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

268697 +++$+++ Spellcast +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268697 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-28 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.225254120E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, thanks heaps for taking the time to review [[Paid in Full (album)]]. It's much appreciated!  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, thanks heaps for taking the time to review [[Paid in Full (album)]]. It's much appreciated! [[User:Spellcast|Spellcast]] ([[User talk:Spellcast|talk]]) 21:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
268698 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268697 +++$+++ 268697 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.225254840E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. It is an extremely good article.  &mdash; +++$+++ :You are very welcome. It is an extremely good article.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

268699 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-29 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.225332480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the review! +++$+++ Thanks for the review![[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 19:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
268700 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268699 +++$+++ 268699 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.225335960E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome!  &mdash; +++$+++ :You are very welcome!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

6556 +++$+++ Hegvald +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-26 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.293426060E09 +++$+++ Please don't go about making stylistic drive-by changes in referencing style in accordance with your own preferences. Read [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (footnotes)]] more carefully; you will discover that there are several styles of referencing that are acceptable in Wikipedia. Using named references is merely one alternative among others. -- +++$+++ Please don't go about making stylistic drive-by changes in referencing style in accordance with your own preferences. Read [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (footnotes)]] more carefully; you will discover that there are several styles of referencing that are acceptable in Wikipedia. Using named references is merely one alternative among others. --[[User:Hegvald|Hegvald]] ([[User talk:Hegvald|talk]]) 21:01, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
6557 +++$+++ Abductive +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6556 +++$+++ 6556 +++$+++ 2010-12-27 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.293438420E09 +++$+++ As far as I can see those changes to Vivian Maier are a marked improvement. Naming refs so that they can be combined into one footnote ''is'' prefered. <font face=\"Cambria\"> +++$+++ *As far as I can see those changes to Vivian Maier are a marked improvement. Naming refs so that they can be combined into one footnote ''is'' prefered. <font face="Cambria">[[User:Abductive|<font color="teal">'''Abductive'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Abductive|reasoning]])</font> 00:27, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

268701 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-25 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.224980760E09 +++$+++ There are several sections that have no citations per WP:CITE of WP:RS. Is there someone watching this article that could fix this and update the article? \u2014Mattisse (Talk) 17:26, 25 October 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ There are several sections that have no citations per WP:CITE of WP:RS. Is there someone watching this article that could fix this and update the article? —Mattisse (Talk) 17:26, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
268702 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.225273500E09 +++$+++ Unfortuanately I know nothing about the topic. I was evaluating the article by minimum [[WP:FAC]] standards only. Looking at your user page, you  have impressive credentials. Even so, I would be very uncomfortable entering information when I know nothing about the subject matter. Are there not others on Wikipedia who know about the subject  and would be interested in the references you could provide? Have you tried to enlist other cooperative editors on the article talk page.? Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Unfortuanately I know nothing about the topic. I was evaluating the article by minimum [[WP:FAC]] standards only. Looking at your user page, you  have impressive credentials. Even so, I would be very uncomfortable entering information when I know nothing about the subject matter. Are there not others on Wikipedia who know about the subject  and would be interested in the references you could provide? Have you tried to enlist other cooperative editors on the article talk page.? Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
268703 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.225322040E09 +++$+++ I did not tag the article. I merely noted on the talk page that it needs references. However, if you prefer, I will tag the parts of the article that need references. It is not my responsibility to provide those references. Rather, it is the editors of the article who should.  Regards,  &mdash; +++$+++ :I did not tag the article. I merely noted on the talk page that it needs references. However, if you prefer, I will tag the parts of the article that need references. It is not my responsibility to provide those references. Rather, it is the editors of the article who should.  Regards,  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:14, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
268704 +++$+++ Malleus Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.225324620E09 +++$+++ Actually Michael you ''are'' an editor for wikipedia, we all are. It is no more or less Mattisse's job to write or organize the article than it is yours, or anyone else's for that matter. -- +++$+++ :Actually Michael you ''are'' an editor for wikipedia, we all are. It is no more or less Mattisse's job to write or organize the article than it is yours, or anyone else's for that matter. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 16:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
268705 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.225335840E09 +++$+++ So there are shades and shades of ways editors with a conflict of interest  can behave. However, I respect your strict concern to keep a distance, but you can make suggestions and offer information via the article talk page. Anyone can. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :So there are shades and shades of ways editors with a conflict of interest  can behave. However, I respect your strict concern to keep a distance, but you can make suggestions and offer information via the article talk page. Anyone can. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
268706 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ 268705 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.225341960E09 +++$+++ Looking at the cases where citations are needed it seems likely that they will be covered by \"The NASA Astrophysics Data System: Overview\" and its three companion articles, either that or the online FAQ, so it a fairly easy fix. You might consider looking at the [[Wikipedia:Scientific citation guidelines]]-- +++$+++ ::Looking at the cases where citations are needed it seems likely that they will be covered by "The NASA Astrophysics Data System: Overview" and its three companion articles, either that or the online FAQ, so it a fairly easy fix. You might consider looking at the [[Wikipedia:Scientific citation guidelines]]--[[User:Salix alba|Salix]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]): 21:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
268707 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ 268706 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.225343100E09 +++$+++ Although my father was a physicist, I know next to nothing about physics. I have read [[Wikipedia:Scientific citation guidelines]]. Right now I am working on [[Major depressive disorder]] which would mean a major change in head set to think in the direction you are suggesting. I did try to redirect some dead links, and the same editor asked me to revert (which I did) because he said they were incorrect. I notice above that he suggested that I could use the \"doi link be the link to the reference, as is preferred by the publisher\" so I could investigate doing that. Maybe later I will follow up on your suggestions. Meanwhile,  how about you doing it? It is an FA and if it just needs the few tweaks you are suggesting, you could do it in a few minutes. I would have to spend hours trying to figure it all out.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Although my father was a physicist, I know next to nothing about physics. I have read [[Wikipedia:Scientific citation guidelines]]. Right now I am working on [[Major depressive disorder]] which would mean a major change in head set to think in the direction you are suggesting. I did try to redirect some dead links, and the same editor asked me to revert (which I did) because he said they were incorrect. I notice above that he suggested that I could use the "doi link be the link to the reference, as is preferred by the publisher" so I could investigate doing that. Maybe later I will follow up on your suggestions. Meanwhile,  how about you doing it? It is an FA and if it just needs the few tweaks you are suggesting, you could do it in a few minutes. I would have to spend hours trying to figure it all out.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
268708 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ 268706 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.225348200E09 +++$+++ MDD is look like a v good article. Good to see your working in your own field. -- +++$+++ :::MDD is look like a v good article. Good to see your working in your own field. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]): 23:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
268709 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268701 +++$+++ 268708 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.225349100E09 +++$+++ I notified all the projects listed on the talk page. Maybe someone will fix it. I also told Mjkurtz that there would be nothing improper about interacting on the talk page. But I understand his ethics and understand why he does not want to do it. I fixed the dead links using the doi links. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I notified all the projects listed on the talk page. Maybe someone will fix it. I also told Mjkurtz that there would be nothing improper about interacting on the talk page. But I understand his ethics and understand why he does not want to do it. I fixed the dead links using the doi links. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

6558 +++$+++ Wolfehhgg +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-03 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.294113360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Wolfehhgg|Wolfehhgg]] ([[User talk:Wolfehhgg|talk]]) 19:56, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
6559 +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6558 +++$+++ 6558 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.294161600E09 +++$+++ It's a good idea to redlink if something is notable enough that it will probably have an article created in the future. One reason is as you said, another reason is it's a courtesy because when it's black (no wikilink) the reader has no idea if a potential live wikilink has since been created, which means they have to manually check. For example imagine this article in 2 years time, those authors currently without a wikilink have since had bio articles created, but no one has updated this article to wikilink to them. It's a common occurrence, you can never assume article's don't exist just because they are not linked. If it's not wikilinked (red or otherwise) you have to manually check, which makes redlinks a convenience for readers they can see right away the status without wondering if an article exists but just hasn't been linked. For authors who have won literary awards, it's a strong case they will eventually have a Wikipedia article. Also some of the more popular book titles that have won multiple awards, can justify redlinks.  +++$+++ :It's a good idea to redlink if something is notable enough that it will probably have an article created in the future. One reason is as you said, another reason is it's a courtesy because when it's black (no wikilink) the reader has no idea if a potential live wikilink has since been created, which means they have to manually check. For example imagine this article in 2 years time, those authors currently without a wikilink have since had bio articles created, but no one has updated this article to wikilink to them. It's a common occurrence, you can never assume article's don't exist just because they are not linked. If it's not wikilinked (red or otherwise) you have to manually check, which makes redlinks a convenience for readers they can see right away the status without wondering if an article exists but just hasn't been linked. For authors who have won literary awards, it's a strong case they will eventually have a Wikipedia article. Also some of the more popular book titles that have won multiple awards, can justify redlinks. [[User:Green Cardamom|Green Cardamom]] ([[User talk:Green Cardamom#top|talk]]) 09:20, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
6560 +++$+++ Wolfehhgg +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6558 +++$+++ 6559 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.294201620E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for clearing that up.  +++$+++ ::Thank you very much for clearing that up. [[User:Wolfehhgg|Wolfehhgg]] ([[User talk:Wolfehhgg|talk]]) 20:27, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
6561 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6558 +++$+++ 6558 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.296347340E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

530847 +++$+++ Bermicourt +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530847 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-22 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.264170480E09 +++$+++ Hi. The [[Lower Saxon house]] is certainly a combination of living quarters, animal stalls and storage barn, but it is quite a specific design and doesn't look like the photo in your article. In fact your housebarn looks more like the [[Middle German house]] which was also a combined dwelling. My suggestion is you continue with your article focussed on the American variant and link to other similar articles like those I've just mentioned under \"See also\". HTH. -- +++$+++ Hi. The [[Lower Saxon house]] is certainly a combination of living quarters, animal stalls and storage barn, but it is quite a specific design and doesn't look like the photo in your article. In fact your housebarn looks more like the [[Middle German house]] which was also a combined dwelling. My suggestion is you continue with your article focussed on the American variant and link to other similar articles like those I've just mentioned under "See also". HTH. --[[User:Bermicourt|Bermicourt]] ([[User talk:Bermicourt|talk]]) 06:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
530848 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530847 +++$+++ 530847 +++$+++ 2010-01-22 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.264193100E09 +++$+++ Thank you both for taking a look at it. I'll continue on alone. I think I'm just about done anyway. I wonder if I'm working on a broad term that both the Lower Saxon and Middle German house fall in. Bermicourt, is there an article on the German Wikipedia that I should link to that means the same thing (iw)? Vic, that 19th century slavery article is very interesting and I found several sources from major U.S. universities that talk about an American \"delegation\" which went to that convention. It's probably enough to write a decent section. Let me know if you want me to make a section, and what kind of priority I should put on it. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thank you both for taking a look at it. I'll continue on alone. I think I'm just about done anyway. I wonder if I'm working on a broad term that both the Lower Saxon and Middle German house fall in. Bermicourt, is there an article on the German Wikipedia that I should link to that means the same thing (iw)? Vic, that 19th century slavery article is very interesting and I found several sources from major U.S. universities that talk about an American "delegation" which went to that convention. It's probably enough to write a decent section. Let me know if you want me to make a section, and what kind of priority I should put on it. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

44784 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ 44784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-04 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.278287100E09 +++$+++ I haven't had a chance to review it in detail yet, but it looks like an impressive effort. Thanks.&mdash; +++$+++ I haven't had a chance to review it in detail yet, but it looks like an impressive effort. Thanks.&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 16:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
44785 +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ 44784 +++$+++ 44784 +++$+++ 2010-07-18 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.279482660E09 +++$+++ Thanks! -- +++$+++ :Thanks! --[[User:Prosperosity|Prosperosity]] ([[User talk:Prosperosity#top|talk]]) 12:51, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

6563 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6563 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.300404720E09 +++$+++ Please don't add entries to the [[list of literary awards]] unless they already have bluelinks. To do otherwise would be to invite spam.  +++$+++ Please don't add entries to the [[list of literary awards]] unless they already have bluelinks. To do otherwise would be to invite spam. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 16:32, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
6564 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6563 +++$+++ 6563 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.300407060E09 +++$+++ Okay. But henceforth, don't add them to the list until ''after'' the links are blue.  +++$+++ :Okay. But henceforth, don't add them to the list until ''after'' the links are blue. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 17:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

530852 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530852 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-25 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.264463520E09 +++$+++ I've just discovered a nice Flickr collection of photos of Civil War historic sites \u2014 many of which are listed on the NRHP \u2014 at http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/leehero\/sets\/72157614994181531\/.  However, all are marked as all-rights-reserved.  Could you help me by messaging the uploader and asking for a free license for at least one of the [[Corinth National Cemetery]] photos?  Thanks!   +++$+++ I've just discovered a nice Flickr collection of photos of Civil War historic sites — many of which are listed on the NRHP — at http://www.flickr.com/photos/leehero/sets/72157614994181531/.  However, all are marked as all-rights-reserved.  Could you help me by messaging the uploader and asking for a free license for at least one of the [[Corinth National Cemetery]] photos?  Thanks!  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 15:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
530853 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530852 +++$+++ 530852 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.264498440E09 +++$+++ I'll try, but I rarely ask someone who's been away from flickr that long. They almost never respond, and when they do they always confuse me by talking like I just asked the question when I had asked it about 9 months earlier. I asked on a different image. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I'll try, but I rarely ask someone who's been away from flickr that long. They almost never respond, and when they do they always confuse me by talking like I just asked the question when I had asked it about 9 months earlier. I asked on a different image. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:34, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
530854 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530852 +++$+++ 530853 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.264568640E09 +++$+++ I'd sign up for a Flickr account, but I don't want to have to pay for something I'd never use except for leaving occasional comments for other people.  Would you be willing to send a note to [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/thisisbossi thisisbossi], who just uploaded some pictures today?  I uploaded one of his photos as [[:File:Reconstructed building in Old Bedford Village.jpg]] to use at [[Bedford Village Archeological Site]], and it's soon going to be the image used at DYK; right now, it's in [[Template:Did you know\/Preparation area 2|preparation area 2]].  Again, thanks!   +++$+++ ::I'd sign up for a Flickr account, but I don't want to have to pay for something I'd never use except for leaving occasional comments for other people.  Would you be willing to send a note to [http://www.flickr.com/people/thisisbossi thisisbossi], who just uploaded some pictures today?  I uploaded one of his photos as [[:File:Reconstructed building in Old Bedford Village.jpg]] to use at [[Bedford Village Archeological Site]], and it's soon going to be the image used at DYK; right now, it's in [[Template:Did you know/Preparation area 2|preparation area 2]].  Again, thanks!  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 21:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
530855 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530852 +++$+++ 530854 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.264578600E09 +++$+++ Actually, flickr accounts are free. There is a pro option if you want to have over 200 images. I waited until I had 200 before I started paying! In any case, I'll take care of it. I urge you to get an account. I used the same name to make it easier, and I added comments to my profile about my involvement at Wikipedia because I was using it for 2 purposes. I'll send the thank yous. Cheers! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Actually, flickr accounts are free. There is a pro option if you want to have over 200 images. I waited until I had 200 before I started paying! In any case, I'll take care of it. I urge you to get an account. I used the same name to make it easier, and I added comments to my profile about my involvement at Wikipedia because I was using it for 2 purposes. I'll send the thank yous. Cheers! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:50, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
530856 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530852 +++$+++ 530855 +++$+++ 2010-01-27 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.264582680E09 +++$+++ I see; after talking with friends some time ago, I'd been under the impression that somehow you had to pay if you didn't want your account to be deleted after a short time, or something like that.  I had thought the pro option was basically if you wanted to be able to do more with the images, not simply so that you could host more of them.  Thanks for leaving the note; I'll see about creating the account soon.   +++$+++ ::::I see; after talking with friends some time ago, I'd been under the impression that somehow you had to pay if you didn't want your account to be deleted after a short time, or something like that.  I had thought the pro option was basically if you wanted to be able to do more with the images, not simply so that you could host more of them.  Thanks for leaving the note; I'll see about creating the account soon.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 00:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
530857 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530852 +++$+++ 530856 +++$+++ 2010-02-04 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.265330040E09 +++$+++ Curious, is it possible to gain access to one's Yahoo email address (the one set up when you create a Flickr account) in any way other than logging into Flickr?  I tried to send an email from my new Flickr email address to my \"real\" email address, but it won't let me because my real email address isn't a contact, and I can't find any other way to log into Yahoo email.   +++$+++ :::::Curious, is it possible to gain access to one's Yahoo email address (the one set up when you create a Flickr account) in any way other than logging into Flickr?  I tried to send an email from my new Flickr email address to my "real" email address, but it won't let me because my real email address isn't a contact, and I can't find any other way to log into Yahoo email.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 16:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
530858 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530852 +++$+++ 530857 +++$+++ 2010-02-05 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.265361720E09 +++$+++ As far as I know, the only way to access the flickr email is within flickr. And I don't think that you can send a message to anywhere else. You might be able to cut and paste the message into an email. I don't know if it would help you, but you could send the message to my flickr account and I could try to do something with it. I would use discretion of course. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::As far as I know, the only way to access the flickr email is within flickr. And I don't think that you can send a message to anywhere else. You might be able to cut and paste the message into an email. I don't know if it would help you, but you could send the message to my flickr account and I could try to do something with it. I would use discretion of course. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
530859 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530852 +++$+++ 530858 +++$+++ 2010-02-06 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.265446140E09 +++$+++ Thanks; I'm not trying to email you, but just seeing if it would work in general.  If it had worked as a normal email address, I suppose that I could have used it if I wanted an anonymous email address; all I have right now is my main email address (with which I emailed you over a year ago, when I was having that medical procedure done) and my college email address, which includes my name.   +++$+++ :::::::Thanks; I'm not trying to email you, but just seeing if it would work in general.  If it had worked as a normal email address, I suppose that I could have used it if I wanted an anonymous email address; all I have right now is my main email address (with which I emailed you over a year ago, when I was having that medical procedure done) and my college email address, which includes my name.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 00:49, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

6568 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-19 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.305793140E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 01:19, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
6569 +++$+++ Jorgenev +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6568 +++$+++ 6568 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.307687400E09 +++$+++ That article has a pretty odd page views distribution. hmm. <small>''' +++$+++ :That article has a pretty odd page views distribution. hmm. <small>'''[[User:Jorgenev#top|jorgenev]]'''</small> 23:30, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
6570 +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6568 +++$+++ 6569 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.307688360E09 +++$+++ Hah, you noticed. Well three events happened: 1. I created the article around the same time the story hit the wire (AP, etc) and so it got a lot of traffic from people Googling his name to learn more. 2. DYK caused the second peak on May 20th. 3. Good Morning America or some other major network show did a video piece about him and that caused the third peak.  +++$+++ ::Hah, you noticed. Well three events happened: 1. I created the article around the same time the story hit the wire (AP, etc) and so it got a lot of traffic from people Googling his name to learn more. 2. DYK caused the second peak on May 20th. 3. Good Morning America or some other major network show did a video piece about him and that caused the third peak. [[User:Green Cardamom|Green Cardamom]] ([[User talk:Green Cardamom#top|talk]]) 23:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
6571 +++$+++ Jorgenev +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6568 +++$+++ 6570 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.307730600E09 +++$+++ Word. Well congrats on the entry into [[WP:DYKSTATS]]! <small>''' +++$+++ :::Word. Well congrats on the entry into [[WP:DYKSTATS]]! <small>'''[[User:Jorgenev#top|jorgenev]]'''</small> 11:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

481692 +++$+++ Anonymous editor +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-06 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.139286540E09 +++$+++ Hi. No actually I referred it to the disambiguation page instead. See [[Al-Badawi]]. There are three different uses for the Bedawi\/Badawi name. -- +++$+++ Hi. No actually I referred it to the disambiguation page instead. See [[Al-Badawi]]. There are three different uses for the Bedawi/Badawi name. --[[user:Anonymous editor|<font color="green">'''a.n.o.n.y.m'''</font>]]  <sup>[[user talk:Anonymous editor| ''t'']]</sup> 20:29, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
481693 +++$+++ Anonymous editor +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481692 +++$+++ 481692 +++$+++ 2006-02-06 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.139286660E09 +++$+++ Thanks. -- +++$+++ :Thanks. --[[user:Anonymous editor|<font color="green">'''a.n.o.n.y.m'''</font>]]  <sup>[[user talk:Anonymous editor| ''t'']]</sup> 20:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

268714 +++$+++ mikkalai +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-02 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.225685940E09 +++$+++ Re [[Lake Baikal]]: please be more caeful with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lake_Baikal&action=history reverting vandals]. `' +++$+++ Re [[Lake Baikal]]: please be more caeful with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lake_Baikal&action=history reverting vandals]. `'[[user:mikkalai|Míkka]][[user talk:mikkalai|>t]] 20:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
268715 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268714 +++$+++ 268714 +++$+++ 2008-11-02 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.225686360E09 +++$+++ O.K. According to the diffs,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lake_Baikal&diff=next&oldid=249224122] all I was reverting was: \"<nowiki>hiCentre]] is an independent research organization carrying out environmental educational and research project at Lake Baikal.<ref>  hiCentre]] is an independent research organization carrying out environmental educational and research project at Lake Baikal.<ref><\/nowiki>\" &mdash; +++$+++ :O.K. According to the diffs,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lake_Baikal&diff=next&oldid=249224122] all I was reverting was: "<nowiki>hiCentre]] is an independent research organization carrying out environmental educational and research project at Lake Baikal.<ref>  hiCentre]] is an independent research organization carrying out environmental educational and research project at Lake Baikal.<ref></nowiki>" &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
268716 +++$+++ mikkalai +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268714 +++$+++ 268715 +++$+++ 2008-11-02 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.225687380E09 +++$+++ Sorry for not being sufficiently clear. Please always look in the whole most recent history of the vandalized page, not just the very last edit.  Quite often valdals are not alone or not satisfied with a single edit. In your case: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lake_Baikal&diff=249229732&oldid=248879721]`' +++$+++ ::Sorry for not being sufficiently clear. Please always look in the whole most recent history of the vandalized page, not just the very last edit.  Quite often valdals are not alone or not satisfied with a single edit. In your case: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lake_Baikal&diff=249229732&oldid=248879721]`'[[user:mikkalai|Míkka]][[user talk:mikkalai|>t]] 20:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

263239 +++$+++ rl +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263239 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-17 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.124305080E09 +++$+++ Your hidden comments in [[Families (TV series)]] have become somewhat excessive. Bear in mind that to most people, this comment will only be confusing. I'm afraid you are feeding the troll. It's no big deal, but I suggest you don't use comments in the article to communicate with another editor.  +++$+++ Your hidden comments in [[Families (TV series)]] have become somewhat excessive. Bear in mind that to most people, this comment will only be confusing. I'm afraid you are feeding the troll. It's no big deal, but I suggest you don't use comments in the article to communicate with another editor. [[User:Rl|Rl]] 11:58, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
263240 +++$+++ rl +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263239 +++$+++ 263239 +++$+++ 2005-08-17 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.124306280E09 +++$+++ No problem. Your approach could work, especially for an odd case like this. I just wanted to let you know early that this is not a good habit to get into :-).  +++$+++ :No problem. Your approach could work, especially for an odd case like this. I just wanted to let you know early that this is not a good habit to get into :-). [[User:Rl|Rl]] 12:18, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

530860 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-26 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.264537500E09 +++$+++ Hey there RB .. sorry I've been so scarce lately .. just been so busy .. hope all is well with you, and hope to be back soon.  All my best! \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ Hey there RB .. sorry I've been so scarce lately .. just been so busy .. hope all is well with you, and hope to be back soon.  All my best! — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 12:25, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
530861 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530860 +++$+++ 530860 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.264540500E09 +++$+++ I'm doing good - I hope that you are too! I've been more active lately with it being winter here and I've had a string of DYKs in the past month. Did you read the Signpost about the BLP boldness? Wow, that's quite a story with someone being so bold with speedy deleting BLPs without giving the rest of the community an ultimatum first. I'd call it reckless and disrespectful to unilaterally decide to not give WikiProjects a chance to fix their problem BLP articles. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I'm doing good - I hope that you are too! I've been more active lately with it being winter here and I've had a string of DYKs in the past month. Did you read the Signpost about the BLP boldness? Wow, that's quite a story with someone being so bold with speedy deleting BLPs without giving the rest of the community an ultimatum first. I'd call it reckless and disrespectful to unilaterally decide to not give WikiProjects a chance to fix their problem BLP articles. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

6573 +++$+++  Sharktopus +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.309814400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for finding a good way to include all the relevant information. I'm working on [[yak butter]] now, if you are interested in taking a look. <font style=\"font-family:sans-serif;color:black;\"> <span style=\"text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml\">  ''''' +++$+++ Thanks for finding a good way to include all the relevant information. I'm working on [[yak butter]] now, if you are interested in taking a look. <font style="font-family:sans-serif;color:black;"> <span style="text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml">  '''''[[User:Sharktopus|Sharktopus]]'''''</span> [[user talk: Sharktopus|<sup>talk</sup></font>]] 14:20, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
6574 +++$+++  Sharktopus +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6573 +++$+++ 6573 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.309826640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help on [[yak butter]] too! I am going to go put us both up for DYK on it now. <font style=\"font-family:sans-serif;color:black;\"> <span style=\"text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml\">  ''''' +++$+++ :Thanks for the help on [[yak butter]] too! I am going to go put us both up for DYK on it now. <font style="font-family:sans-serif;color:black;"> <span style="text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class=texhtml">  '''''[[User:Sharktopus|Sharktopus]]'''''</span> [[user talk: Sharktopus|<sup>talk</sup></font>]] 17:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

530862 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530862 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-27 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.264649700E09 +++$+++ One of the editors took out the whole section of the UW-La Crosse alumni claiming it is not cited. There were only 4 redlinks but they had citations. I thought once you put a name in that is notable there would be no problems. The editor did leave the faculty section.Thanks- +++$+++ One of the editors took out the whole section of the UW-La Crosse alumni claiming it is not cited. There were only 4 redlinks but they had citations. I thought once you put a name in that is notable there would be no problems. The editor did leave the faculty section.Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 19:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
530863 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530862 +++$+++ 530862 +++$+++ 2010-01-27 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.264655460E09 +++$+++ I re-added the section and added citations. Cheers -- +++$+++ :I re-added the section and added citations. Cheers --[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 21:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
530864 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530862 +++$+++ 530863 +++$+++ 2010-01-28 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.264666500E09 +++$+++ Talkpage stalking is cool! Thanks, BaronLarf!  '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Talkpage stalking is cool! Thanks, BaronLarf!  '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

268719 +++$+++ Protonk +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-03 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.225719480E09 +++$+++ I think most of the Milhist\/WP:SHIPS folks get a mite touchy when asked about the Military\/European dating thing.  It might come from having to deal with questions\/reversions for so long (I can't imagine how frustrating it would be to revert good faith date changes to an article on an American ship for months or years), or it might be a peculiarity of the project.  Either way it is odd to watch.  I even [[Talk:USS_Constitution\/GA1#MOS.2FLayout|asked about it in the GA review]] in an attempt to get some reasoning (having myself been forced to wear my hair short and write day-month-year in ships logs for years) and got a sort of curt answer.  No playfulness. :)  Ah well.  +++$+++ I think most of the Milhist/WP:SHIPS folks get a mite touchy when asked about the Military/European dating thing.  It might come from having to deal with questions/reversions for so long (I can't imagine how frustrating it would be to revert good faith date changes to an article on an American ship for months or years), or it might be a peculiarity of the project.  Either way it is odd to watch.  I even [[Talk:USS_Constitution/GA1#MOS.2FLayout|asked about it in the GA review]] in an attempt to get some reasoning (having myself been forced to wear my hair short and write day-month-year in ships logs for years) and got a sort of curt answer.  No playfulness. :)  Ah well. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 05:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
268720 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268719 +++$+++ 268719 +++$+++ 2008-11-03 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.225764600E09 +++$+++ Yes, apparently they are touchy. My intent was not to annoy. Thanks for your explanation.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes, apparently they are touchy. My intent was not to annoy. Thanks for your explanation.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:10, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

268721 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268721 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-03 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.225784820E09 +++$+++ Don't \"bow out\". It's clear both you and Cas have wound each other up and are getting annoyed. Try to consider how much pressure Cas will be feeling, as FAC is a stressful place to be. But I also know it can be stressful to be the minority oppose, wondering why everyone else hasn't spotted the glaring WP:V violations and are changing their !votes. But it isn't a vote and you don't need to change the other reviewer's minds. Stick to commenting on the article (not the editors or the FAC process) and if you raise serious concerns then they will be taken seriously. Take a break, sure. But FAC needs expert reviewers. I hope you can interpret my review as \"to the best that I'm able to judge this article, I think it's worthy of FA\" but understand that I respect if experts say \"well, actually, this and this aren't right, and that isn't totally accurate either...\"  +++$+++ Don't "bow out". It's clear both you and Cas have wound each other up and are getting annoyed. Try to consider how much pressure Cas will be feeling, as FAC is a stressful place to be. But I also know it can be stressful to be the minority oppose, wondering why everyone else hasn't spotted the glaring WP:V violations and are changing their !votes. But it isn't a vote and you don't need to change the other reviewer's minds. Stick to commenting on the article (not the editors or the FAC process) and if you raise serious concerns then they will be taken seriously. Take a break, sure. But FAC needs expert reviewers. I hope you can interpret my review as "to the best that I'm able to judge this article, I think it's worthy of FA" but understand that I respect if experts say "well, actually, this and this aren't right, and that isn't totally accurate either..." [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 23:47, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
268722 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268721 +++$+++ 268721 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.225792920E09 +++$+++ No thanks.  Apparently now  I am being personally attacked because I echoed the comments of [[User:Snowmanradio]]. I don't think I am the minority, except in the little circle of people who \"wrote\" the article, even though I have edited the article more than all but three others, only one of which is commenting on the article now. Attempting to improve a bad article is not worth being personally attacked.  If you defend such behavior by Cas, as you call him, that is within your rights.  But why don't you [[WP:AGF|assume some good faith]] instead of lecturing me. I see by the last comments on [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Major depressive disorder]] that lecturing is in fashion, that improvements to the article by [[User:Snowmanradio]] are considered \"edit warring\".  What a strange world is this FAC club.  &mdash; +++$+++ :No thanks.  Apparently now  I am being personally attacked because I echoed the comments of [[User:Snowmanradio]]. I don't think I am the minority, except in the little circle of people who "wrote" the article, even though I have edited the article more than all but three others, only one of which is commenting on the article now. Attempting to improve a bad article is not worth being personally attacked.  If you defend such behavior by Cas, as you call him, that is within your rights.  But why don't you [[WP:AGF|assume some good faith]] instead of lecturing me. I see by the last comments on [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Major depressive disorder]] that lecturing is in fashion, that improvements to the article by [[User:Snowmanradio]] are considered "edit warring".  What a strange world is this FAC club.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
268723 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268721 +++$+++ 268722 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.225822200E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry you feel that way and hope you change your mind after a break. Understanding why Casliber might be frustrated enough to say what he said, isn't the same thing as defending what he said (I don't). I don't know why you think I don't \"assume good faith\" towards you. Why would I want to you continue participating if I thought your comments were made in bad faith? BTW: I assumed from Casliber's talk page that his first name was (or is shortened to) Cas. I don't know the guy and don't know any of the nominators other than Paul, who isn't exactly on my Christmas card list. Saying there is a \"club\" makes me feel you devalue my opinion as not independent and rationally based.  +++$+++ ::I'm sorry you feel that way and hope you change your mind after a break. Understanding why Casliber might be frustrated enough to say what he said, isn't the same thing as defending what he said (I don't). I don't know why you think I don't "assume good faith" towards you. Why would I want to you continue participating if I thought your comments were made in bad faith? BTW: I assumed from Casliber's talk page that his first name was (or is shortened to) Cas. I don't know the guy and don't know any of the nominators other than Paul, who isn't exactly on my Christmas card list. Saying there is a "club" makes me feel you devalue my opinion as not independent and rationally based. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 10:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
268724 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268721 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-03 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.225780440E09 +++$+++ \"Cas's\" reply: ''To Mattise -  ...I think that casting aspersions on other established editors as lazy at best and dishonest at worst is bordering on a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]]. I advise you to keep comments short, constructive and to the point and avoid making assumptions about others. Lengthy rants have the appearance of filibustering to disrupt this to make a [[WP:POINT|point]]...'' Cheers,  +++$+++ :::::*"Cas's" reply: ''To Mattise -  ...I think that casting aspersions on other established editors as lazy at best and dishonest at worst is bordering on a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]]. I advise you to keep comments short, constructive and to the point and avoid making assumptions about others. Lengthy rants have the appearance of filibustering to disrupt this to make a [[WP:POINT|point]]...'' Cheers, [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 22:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
268725 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268721 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.225836600E09 +++$+++ I hope that there are not attempts to drive off [[User:Snowmanradio]] also.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::*I hope that there are not attempts to drive off [[User:Snowmanradio]] also.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
268726 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268721 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.225836600E09 +++$+++ Addendum - I have been active on the article talk pages with similar futility. I have read the archived talk pages so I know exactly what was discussed in the writing of the article. I noted that sex differences were never discussed in the talk pages and needed to be addressed, including hormones (which [[User:Snowmanradio]] also suggested). \"Cas's\" reply was, well what do you expect as the editors are male. Apparently he is unwilling to  examine sex differences.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::*Addendum - I have been active on the article talk pages with similar futility. I have read the archived talk pages so I know exactly what was discussed in the writing of the article. I noted that sex differences were never discussed in the talk pages and needed to be addressed, including hormones (which [[User:Snowmanradio]] also suggested). "Cas's" reply was, well what do you expect as the editors are male. Apparently he is unwilling to  examine sex differences.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
268727 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268721 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.225849260E09 +++$+++ BTW: the 25% figure comes from me and is the percentage of sentences that have been changed ''at all''. Almost all those changes are copyedits and I don't think that percentage is particularly high for FAC. What surprises me most is how little text has been removed or added, which is much more common if the article was substantially deficient.  +++$+++ :::::BTW: the 25% figure comes from me and is the percentage of sentences that have been changed ''at all''. Almost all those changes are copyedits and I don't think that percentage is particularly high for FAC. What surprises me most is how little text has been removed or added, which is much more common if the article was substantially deficient. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 17:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
268728 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268721 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.225855260E09 +++$+++ I have not looked at MDD in the last few days, but I am not at all confident that it can become a true FAC at this point, like [[Bupropion]] (which I admire), or the two mentioned above. There are major unresolved issues that are not just a question of wording.   Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::I have not looked at MDD in the last few days, but I am not at all confident that it can become a true FAC at this point, like [[Bupropion]] (which I admire), or the two mentioned above. There are major unresolved issues that are not just a question of wording.   Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

6579 +++$+++ Ammodramus +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312452120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ammodramus|Ammodramus]] ([[User talk:Ammodramus|talk]]) 03:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
6580 +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6579 +++$+++ 6579 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.312456080E09 +++$+++ typo, fixed, thanks.  +++$+++ :typo, fixed, thanks. [[User:Green Cardamom|Green Cardamom]] ([[User talk:Green Cardamom#top|talk]]) 04:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
6581 +++$+++ Ammodramus +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6579 +++$+++ 6580 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312453260E09 +++$+++ In connection with this, I've just looked at the article on [[E. S. Dallas]], to which you've recently added a mention of his editing ''OAW'' briefly in 1868.  According to a number of my Trollope sources, he was still editor in March 1869.  Can you check up on this?  Unfortunately, my sources don't give the dates of his tenure at ''OAW'', so I can't edit the article myself.  -- +++$+++ ::In connection with this, I've just looked at the article on [[E. S. Dallas]], to which you've recently added a mention of his editing ''OAW'' briefly in 1868.  According to a number of my Trollope sources, he was still editor in March 1869.  Can you check up on this?  Unfortunately, my sources don't give the dates of his tenure at ''OAW'', so I can't edit the article myself.  --[[User:Ammodramus|Ammodramus]] ([[User talk:Ammodramus|talk]]) 03:21, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
6582 +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ Green Cardamom +++$+++ 6579 +++$+++ 6581 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.312456080E09 +++$+++ I don't have a source, my edit was a dab, go with your source since whoever wrote it didn't cite.  +++$+++ :::I don't have a source, my edit was a dab, go with your source since whoever wrote it didn't cite. [[User:Green Cardamom|Green Cardamom]] ([[User talk:Green Cardamom#top|talk]]) 04:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

612766 +++$+++ Lsi john +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-05 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.183689420E09 +++$+++ Happy editing. <small>Peace.<\/small> +++$+++ Happy editing. <small>Peace.</small>[[User:Lsi john|Lsi]] [[User talk:Lsi john|john]] 19:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
612767 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612766 +++$+++ 612766 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.183693560E09 +++$+++ Hope we're on the same page, your potential witty response to my Christian comment sounds intriguing, and if others would take it wrongly, do please email it to me. Sorry if my sarky Scottish sense of humour offends. For context, see Dembski: \"Intelligent design is just the Logos theology of John's Gospel restated in the idiom of information theory,\" Jesus is truth. Perhaps by coincidence, the [[Gospel of John]] includes \"love one another\" and \"If a man abide not in me...they are burned\". The latter part of which, that well known theology student [[Charles Darwin]] thought a \"damnable doctrine\" due to his concerns about other family members. All of which is, we hope, irrelevant. All the best, ..  +++$+++ :Hope we're on the same page, your potential witty response to my Christian comment sounds intriguing, and if others would take it wrongly, do please email it to me. Sorry if my sarky Scottish sense of humour offends. For context, see Dembski: "Intelligent design is just the Logos theology of John's Gospel restated in the idiom of information theory," Jesus is truth. Perhaps by coincidence, the [[Gospel of John]] includes "love one another" and "If a man abide not in me...they are burned". The latter part of which, that well known theology student [[Charles Darwin]] thought a "damnable doctrine" due to his concerns about other family members. All of which is, we hope, irrelevant. All the best, .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
612768 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612766 +++$+++ 612767 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.183920480E09 +++$+++ For info, someone wanted references on his views, so [[Charles Darwin's views on religion#Darwin's loss of faith]] now has an expanded explanation of this topic. ..  +++$+++ ::For info, someone wanted references on his views, so [[Charles Darwin's views on religion#Darwin's loss of faith]] now has an expanded explanation of this topic. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 11:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

530872 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530872 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-30 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.264909380E09 +++$+++ Hi, would you be interested in helping me develop [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Scott County, Iowa]] as was suggested in [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Neighborhoods of Davenport, Iowa\/archive1|my peer review]]? Thank you, <font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ Hi, would you be interested in helping me develop [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Scott County, Iowa]] as was suggested in [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Neighborhoods of Davenport, Iowa/archive1|my peer review]]? Thank you, <font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="#ffff00">J</font><font color="#009900">F</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]] [[User Talk:Ctjf83|chat]]</font> 19:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
530873 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530872 +++$+++ 530872 +++$+++ 2010-01-30 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.264909440E09 +++$+++ Not for a few days, in the early to mid part of a 50 hour trivia contest. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Not for a few days, in the early to mid part of a 50 hour trivia contest. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 19:44, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
530874 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530872 +++$+++ 530873 +++$+++ 2010-01-30 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.264910220E09 +++$+++ Sounds fun, keep me posted please. :) <font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ ::Sounds fun, keep me posted please. :) <font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="#ffff00">J</font><font color="#009900">F</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]] [[User Talk:Ctjf83|chat]]</font> 19:57, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
530875 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530872 +++$+++ 530873 +++$+++ 2010-01-30 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.264910820E09 +++$+++ Actually I can't say too much - protecting real identity - and making enemies with having to enforce vandalism patrol during the contest. I don't want them to be able to get back at me by letting them get me in trouble at the contest. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Actually I can't say too much - protecting real identity - and making enemies with having to enforce vandalism patrol during the contest. I don't want them to be able to get back at me by letting them get me in trouble at the contest. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 20:07, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
530876 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530872 +++$+++ 530875 +++$+++ 2010-01-30 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.264911180E09 +++$+++ Wait, what? I didn't mean keep me posted on the contest.....LOL.... <font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ :::Wait, what? I didn't mean keep me posted on the contest.....LOL.... <font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="#ffff00">J</font><font color="#009900">F</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]] [[User Talk:Ctjf83|chat]]</font> 20:13, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
530877 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530872 +++$+++ 530876 +++$+++ 2010-01-30 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.264912260E09 +++$+++ Sorry about the misunderstanding. I'm in a marathon. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::Sorry about the misunderstanding. I'm in a marathon. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 20:31, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
530878 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530872 +++$+++ 530877 +++$+++ 2010-01-30 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.264918620E09 +++$+++ Good Luck! <font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ :::::Good Luck! <font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="#ffff00">J</font><font color="#009900">F</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]] [[User Talk:Ctjf83|chat]]</font> 22:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
530879 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530872 +++$+++ 530878 +++$+++ 2010-01-31 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.264935420E09 +++$+++ I don't work in Iowa like Doncram thought. I do Wisconsin articles by adding many pictures. I haven't worked on any content. I have worked on some Good Articles on other topics. You need to flesh out content, some stats, very much to do to get it to featured. It's basically at the start level. No insult intended. At least featured lists aren't usually to hard to do. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::I don't work in Iowa like Doncram thought. I do Wisconsin articles by adding many pictures. I haven't worked on any content. I have worked on some Good Articles on other topics. You need to flesh out content, some stats, very much to do to get it to featured. It's basically at the start level. No insult intended. At least featured lists aren't usually to hard to do. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
530880 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530872 +++$+++ 530879 +++$+++ 2010-01-31 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.264946160E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks, <font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ ::::::: Ok, thanks, <font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="#ffff00">J</font><font color="#009900">F</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]] [[User Talk:Ctjf83|chat]]</font> 05:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

6585 +++$+++ Scimitar +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-07 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.126140480E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule]].  Disputes over content should be worked out on the talk page of an article, not by revert warring in the article itself.  Thank you. -- +++$+++ Please see [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule]].  Disputes over content should be worked out on the talk page of an article, not by revert warring in the article itself.  Thank you. --[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] [[User talk:Scimitar|<sup>parley</sup>]] 17:48, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
6586 +++$+++ Scimitar +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6585 +++$+++ 6585 +++$+++ 2005-09-08 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.126214220E09 +++$+++ Now, I've only had time to take a relatively quick look at the article's talk page, and your edit in particular, but it seems to me that a) The ''Weekly Standard'' is a particularly biased source, b) the alleged link between Hussein and Al-Qaeda has always been controversial (and I know this because I've read several books and newspaper articles published prior to 9\/11 on the subject of Middle-Eastern based terrorism- Hussein is certainly not a friend to religious extremist Muslims, as he's a secular dictator, not a religious fundamentalist) and c) I'm afraid that your information probably would be better suited to other articles, like the ones on Atta and the 9\/11 commisison- I tend to agree with the opinion of others that it isn't terribly connected to Hussein, just because the only source that I saw you reference was a speculative piece in the ''Standard''.  If you have a better reference than that, that's another matter.  That said, I'm an interested amateur, not an expert, on the subject, and my interest right now is in making it clear that edit-warring is harmful.  If you cant talk it out, I suggest seeing [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution]].-- +++$+++ *Now, I've only had time to take a relatively quick look at the article's talk page, and your edit in particular, but it seems to me that a) The ''Weekly Standard'' is a particularly biased source, b) the alleged link between Hussein and Al-Qaeda has always been controversial (and I know this because I've read several books and newspaper articles published prior to 9/11 on the subject of Middle-Eastern based terrorism- Hussein is certainly not a friend to religious extremist Muslims, as he's a secular dictator, not a religious fundamentalist) and c) I'm afraid that your information probably would be better suited to other articles, like the ones on Atta and the 9/11 commisison- I tend to agree with the opinion of others that it isn't terribly connected to Hussein, just because the only source that I saw you reference was a speculative piece in the ''Standard''.  If you have a better reference than that, that's another matter.  That said, I'm an interested amateur, not an expert, on the subject, and my interest right now is in making it clear that edit-warring is harmful.  If you cant talk it out, I suggest seeing [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution]].--[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] [[User talk:Scimitar|<sup>parley</sup>]] 14:17, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
6587 +++$+++ Scimitar +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6585 +++$+++ 6586 +++$+++ 2005-09-08 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.126215000E09 +++$+++ I warned you about 3RR. Don't break the rules. I've blocked you for an hour just to show you that there are consequences for violating policy.  If you continue, you won't just be hearing from me- you'll be potentially facing an RfC or the Arbitration Committee.  Now, if you have a problem with article content, go the proper route. Don't break 3RR. -- +++$+++ **I warned you about 3RR. Don't break the rules. I've blocked you for an hour just to show you that there are consequences for violating policy.  If you continue, you won't just be hearing from me- you'll be potentially facing an RfC or the Arbitration Committee.  Now, if you have a problem with article content, go the proper route. Don't break 3RR. --[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] [[User talk:Scimitar|<sup>parley</sup>]] 14:30, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

268731 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268731 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-04 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.225860660E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I have revised the lede and the para breaks in [[Idries Shah]]. Any good? Best, <font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I have revised the lede and the para breaks in [[Idries Shah]]. Any good? Best, <font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|Jayen]]</font>''<font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>'' 20:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
268732 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268731 +++$+++ 268731 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.225861440E09 +++$+++ I will take a look at it. The lead looks very good.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I will take a look at it. The lead looks very good.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

6589 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-27 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.127808780E09 +++$+++ csloat, none of the information in my edits have been refuted by anyone.  I am surprised at your accusations.  You are the one who has asked me to add information to other pages, such as the Able Danger page and the 9\/11 Commission article.  None of the newspaper quotes have been proven false and the information remains on the original page.  All of my edits added value, context and information readers will find interesting and informative.   +++$+++ csloat, none of the information in my edits have been refuted by anyone.  I am surprised at your accusations.  You are the one who has asked me to add information to other pages, such as the Able Danger page and the 9/11 Commission article.  None of the newspaper quotes have been proven false and the information remains on the original page.  All of my edits added value, context and information readers will find interesting and informative.  [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 01:13, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
6590 +++$+++ Commodore Sloat +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6589 +++$+++ 6589 +++$+++ 2005-09-27 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.127810340E09 +++$+++ Ron, the connection between Able Danger and the Saddam\/AQ connection has been refuted over and over by me.  Stop playing dumb.  I asked you to put it only on pages where it was relevant, not to add it maliciously to pages where it has no relevance so you can keep your conspiracy theory alive.  Your edits add nothing of substance to those other pages except to mislead people that this conspiracy theory has credibility.-- +++$+++ :Ron, the connection between Able Danger and the Saddam/AQ connection has been refuted over and over by me.  Stop playing dumb.  I asked you to put it only on pages where it was relevant, not to add it maliciously to pages where it has no relevance so you can keep your conspiracy theory alive.  Your edits add nothing of substance to those other pages except to mislead people that this conspiracy theory has credibility.--[[User:Commodore Sloat|csloat]] 01:39, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

268735 +++$+++ Skagedal +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-08 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.226189760E09 +++$+++ Why are you shouting in edit comments and internal notes? It is really unneccessary. \/<tt> +++$+++ Why are you shouting in edit comments and internal notes? It is really unneccessary. /<tt>[[User:Skagedal|skagedal]]</tt>[[User_talk:Skagedal|<sup>...</sup>]] 16:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
268736 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268735 +++$+++ 268735 +++$+++ 2008-11-08 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.226190300E09 +++$+++ Because I have been complaining about this for over two weeks, both on the FAC page and on the article talk pages, and have gotten nowhere. My complains have not been addressed, in fact, they have been completely ignored with no replies.  Except, I was personally attacked for complaining about the misuse of primary sources in the Rating scale section. I am very frustrated at the way sources are used to mislead in this article.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Because I have been complaining about this for over two weeks, both on the FAC page and on the article talk pages, and have gotten nowhere. My complains have not been addressed, in fact, they have been completely ignored with no replies.  Except, I was personally attacked for complaining about the misuse of primary sources in the Rating scale section. I am very frustrated at the way sources are used to mislead in this article.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

6593 +++$+++ TheronJ +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-08 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.139444940E09 +++$+++ I appeciate your contributions too, and just want to chip in.  I think you'll find that if you back off on the \"You're pushing your POV\" and switch to \"I think it's important that we say . . .\", you'll find there's some common ground.  Thanks,  +++$+++ I appeciate your contributions too, and just want to chip in.  I think you'll find that if you back off on the "You're pushing your POV" and switch to "I think it's important that we say . . .", you'll find there's some common ground.  Thanks, [[User:TheronJ|TheronJ]] 16:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
6594 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6593 +++$+++ 6593 +++$+++ 2006-02-08 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.139447400E09 +++$+++ Theron, I appreciate your trying to mediate.  Unfortunately, Ryan and csloat so commonly fight over POV that ignoring their POV-pushing is not possible.  I first learned the term of POV-pusher from csloat because he accused me of it when I tried to bring some balance to one of the articles he was editing.  It is funny that you find Ryan less of a POV pusher.  I have never seen her make a concession no matter how strongly the facts are against her.  csloat will make a concession on occasion but not if he thinks the point is crucial to his POV. You can read more of my comments about their conduct on the RFC on Mr j galt.  +++$+++ :Theron, I appreciate your trying to mediate.  Unfortunately, Ryan and csloat so commonly fight over POV that ignoring their POV-pushing is not possible.  I first learned the term of POV-pusher from csloat because he accused me of it when I tried to bring some balance to one of the articles he was editing.  It is funny that you find Ryan less of a POV pusher.  I have never seen her make a concession no matter how strongly the facts are against her.  csloat will make a concession on occasion but not if he thinks the point is crucial to his POV. You can read more of my comments about their conduct on the RFC on Mr j galt. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 17:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

6595 +++$+++ Evensong +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6595 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-11 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.139652540E09 +++$+++ I got your message left on my discussion page.  The page changes so rapidly and the actual affair changes rapidly too.  I will do what I can to bring balance to the page, but my time is for now limited.  #1 on my list of changes is the Book of Honor portion of the page where it is speculated that there was damage due to the Plame leak because there is an anonymous star in the book.  That is raw speculation.  The assertion has zero support anywhere but for Kos and the DU.  Even Kos called it unvarnished speculation.  Now another page has appeared on Kos citing the wikipedia article in support of the position that harm was done.  Kos supports wiki, whiki then supports Kos, with no documentation.  It's the echo chamber effect.  It is irresponsible editing and it must go.  +++$+++ I got your message left on my discussion page.  The page changes so rapidly and the actual affair changes rapidly too.  I will do what I can to bring balance to the page, but my time is for now limited.  #1 on my list of changes is the Book of Honor portion of the page where it is speculated that there was damage due to the Plame leak because there is an anonymous star in the book.  That is raw speculation.  The assertion has zero support anywhere but for Kos and the DU.  Even Kos called it unvarnished speculation.  Now another page has appeared on Kos citing the wikipedia article in support of the position that harm was done.  Kos supports wiki, whiki then supports Kos, with no documentation.  It's the echo chamber effect.  It is irresponsible editing and it must go. [[User:Evensong|Evensong]] 02:09, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
6596 +++$+++ Mr j galt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6595 +++$+++ 6595 +++$+++ 2006-02-13 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.139856660E09 +++$+++ Evensong is correct here.  I am still around, just taking a little wikibreak.  I strongly support your efforts to restore NPOV on the Plame Affair site.  Let me know if I can be of any help.-- +++$+++ :Evensong is correct here.  I am still around, just taking a little wikibreak.  I strongly support your efforts to restore NPOV on the Plame Affair site.  Let me know if I can be of any help.--[[User:Mr j galt|Mr j galt]] 10:51, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

6597 +++$+++ Commodore Sloat +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-21 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.140523740E09 +++$+++ Come on Ron - you hit a new low with your edits to the Negroponte and the Shaw articles.  Your entries were entirely one-sided.  In the case of Negroponte you took a source with a known bias and reputation for distortion, the Weekly Standard, and used it as your exclusive source of information even though Negroponte's own office addressed the issue and you were well aware of it.  Your work creating the Shaw article was even worse -- excluding all information about the fact that this guy was a known criminal under FBI investigation and instead pretending his \"October Surprise\" accusations that were sheer electioneering had some kind of merit.  In that case you were also well aware of what you were leaving out since you included the LATimes article from July 2004 mentioning the investigation in your references.  Yet you relied exclusively on the Moonie controlled Washington Times for your information and even then only used one side of the story from that source!  I know you have your biases and conspiracy theories, and you are welcome to them, but at least try to write things with NPOV in mind, and when you know of another side to a story please include some reference to it.  Other editors are less likely to pounce on your edits if you are more thoughtful about them.-- +++$+++ Come on Ron - you hit a new low with your edits to the Negroponte and the Shaw articles.  Your entries were entirely one-sided.  In the case of Negroponte you took a source with a known bias and reputation for distortion, the Weekly Standard, and used it as your exclusive source of information even though Negroponte's own office addressed the issue and you were well aware of it.  Your work creating the Shaw article was even worse -- excluding all information about the fact that this guy was a known criminal under FBI investigation and instead pretending his "October Surprise" accusations that were sheer electioneering had some kind of merit.  In that case you were also well aware of what you were leaving out since you included the LATimes article from July 2004 mentioning the investigation in your references.  Yet you relied exclusively on the Moonie controlled Washington Times for your information and even then only used one side of the story from that source!  I know you have your biases and conspiracy theories, and you are welcome to them, but at least try to write things with NPOV in mind, and when you know of another side to a story please include some reference to it.  Other editors are less likely to pounce on your edits if you are more thoughtful about them.--[[User:Commodore Sloat|csloat]] 04:09, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
6598 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6597 +++$+++ 6597 +++$+++ 2006-02-21 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.140568020E09 +++$+++ The Weekly Standard is a conservative publication.  That does not mean contents of the publication should be banned from public discourse.  It is your extremely partisan POV that causes you to think so.  If you feel information was excluded regarding Negroponte, you are welcome to include it.  You know very well that I do not practice censorship in the way you do.  Regarding Shaw, I included citations about the charges against Shaw as well as the charges he made, the same charges he continues to make in public.  It is truly amusing to have you lecture me on writing with NPOV in mind, because that is something you never do. You never would have included citations on the charges against Shaw if you did not want readers to know that information.  +++$+++ :The Weekly Standard is a conservative publication.  That does not mean contents of the publication should be banned from public discourse.  It is your extremely partisan POV that causes you to think so.  If you feel information was excluded regarding Negroponte, you are welcome to include it.  You know very well that I do not practice censorship in the way you do.  Regarding Shaw, I included citations about the charges against Shaw as well as the charges he made, the same charges he continues to make in public.  It is truly amusing to have you lecture me on writing with NPOV in mind, because that is something you never do. You never would have included citations on the charges against Shaw if you did not want readers to know that information. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 16:27, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
6599 +++$+++ Commodore Sloat +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6597 +++$+++ 6598 +++$+++ 2006-02-21 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.140572100E09 +++$+++ Stop distorting my claims, Ron.  I never said it should be banned from public discourse; what I said was that it was blatantly POV to only include their take on something when there is information from more reliable sources that you know is available.  I did include the information that you excluded.  I know that you do practice censorship by leaving out important parts of the story when you can get away with it and by deleting relevant information while disguising your deletions in other edits.  You have done this time and time again.  In the Shaw article you only included information suggesting that Shaw was right all along.  As for your accusations about me, you are flat out wrong and anyone can see that -- I often include perspectives other my own when I know of such information, and I never censor such information when it is there.  As I have said over and over again, my philosophy is that the remedy for false information is to present the true information alongside it rather than delete information that is there.  You are the one who presented the Shaw entry as if he was some kind of important hero rather than a criminal, so don't tell me I would have excluded information about him.-- +++$+++ ::Stop distorting my claims, Ron.  I never said it should be banned from public discourse; what I said was that it was blatantly POV to only include their take on something when there is information from more reliable sources that you know is available.  I did include the information that you excluded.  I know that you do practice censorship by leaving out important parts of the story when you can get away with it and by deleting relevant information while disguising your deletions in other edits.  You have done this time and time again.  In the Shaw article you only included information suggesting that Shaw was right all along.  As for your accusations about me, you are flat out wrong and anyone can see that -- I often include perspectives other my own when I know of such information, and I never censor such information when it is there.  As I have said over and over again, my philosophy is that the remedy for false information is to present the true information alongside it rather than delete information that is there.  You are the one who presented the Shaw entry as if he was some kind of important hero rather than a criminal, so don't tell me I would have excluded information about him.--[[User:Commodore Sloat|csloat]] 17:35, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
6600 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6597 +++$+++ 6599 +++$+++ 2006-02-21 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.140593700E09 +++$+++ I am not twisting your words csloat.  Weekly Standard is a reliable source.  CBS (Dan Rather), NBC (trucks rigged to blow up) and NY Times (Jayson Blair) are all less reliable than Weekly Standard, yet you would prefer any of these sources because they are measurably more liberal (see the UCLA study that measured media bias) than Weekly Standard. Your recent critcism of my deleting the date you provided for the Saddam Tapes is a rarity.  I discussed the fact the date you provided is probably wrong and why.  Your entry failed to provide a citation for the date as well.  Regarding your censorship, you have a long history of deleting well-documented and relevant information.  You make up any number of excuses (wrong page, not relevant, debunked elsewhere, etc.) that are simply not true. You also have a reputation for rallying fellow editors to your side to delete valid entries as well.  I defy you to name one entry you made on the [[Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda]] page that would support the idea of a link.  In fact, when I first arrived at the page you wanted the article title to include \"Conspiracy Theory\" in a VERY strong attempt at POV.  All this despite the fact the Senate Report on PreWar Intelligence admits Saddam trained al-Qaeda.  I can show many, many valid entries you deleted repeatedly.  Your sense of fair play needs an overhaul.  Regarding Shaw, I do not view him as a criminal.  No charges have been filed against him.  Shaw lost his job but not because of any malfeasance on his part but apparently only because he exceeded his authority in disclosing the Russians helped moved the WMD out of Iraq. The official reason he left office was because a reorganization of the office cut his position. Calling Shaw a criminal only shows your POV.  +++$+++ :::I am not twisting your words csloat.  Weekly Standard is a reliable source.  CBS (Dan Rather), NBC (trucks rigged to blow up) and NY Times (Jayson Blair) are all less reliable than Weekly Standard, yet you would prefer any of these sources because they are measurably more liberal (see the UCLA study that measured media bias) than Weekly Standard. Your recent critcism of my deleting the date you provided for the Saddam Tapes is a rarity.  I discussed the fact the date you provided is probably wrong and why.  Your entry failed to provide a citation for the date as well.  Regarding your censorship, you have a long history of deleting well-documented and relevant information.  You make up any number of excuses (wrong page, not relevant, debunked elsewhere, etc.) that are simply not true. You also have a reputation for rallying fellow editors to your side to delete valid entries as well.  I defy you to name one entry you made on the [[Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda]] page that would support the idea of a link.  In fact, when I first arrived at the page you wanted the article title to include "Conspiracy Theory" in a VERY strong attempt at POV.  All this despite the fact the Senate Report on PreWar Intelligence admits Saddam trained al-Qaeda.  I can show many, many valid entries you deleted repeatedly.  Your sense of fair play needs an overhaul.  Regarding Shaw, I do not view him as a criminal.  No charges have been filed against him.  Shaw lost his job but not because of any malfeasance on his part but apparently only because he exceeded his authority in disclosing the Russians helped moved the WMD out of Iraq. The official reason he left office was because a reorganization of the office cut his position. Calling Shaw a criminal only shows your POV. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 23:35, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

530887 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-07 07:37:00 +++$+++ 1.265557020E09 +++$+++ An editor has repeatedly been trying to add wikilinks to deleted articles at [[Mukwonago, Wisconsin]], including one apparently about himself. I've reverted twice already. Could you take a look at it and weigh in on how you feel about the additions to the notable residents section if they are added again? Thanks, -- +++$+++ An editor has repeatedly been trying to add wikilinks to deleted articles at [[Mukwonago, Wisconsin]], including one apparently about himself. I've reverted twice already. Could you take a look at it and weigh in on how you feel about the additions to the notable residents section if they are added again? Thanks, --[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 07:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
530888 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530887 +++$+++ 530887 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.265576580E09 +++$+++ I see no thread so I'll answer here. Well, it should be deleted if it's a red link, except in cases of very obvious notability like the Olympian from Mukwonago - that person will definitely eventually get an article by an Olympics fan. A case for notability for this individual could be made, but will that article be made by someone who doesn't have a conflict of interest? I doubt it. I suppose if Rod would make a nice article, free of [[WP:ADVERT|self-promotion]], written in a [[WP:NPOV|neutral]] language, with an encyclopedic tone, and get it to stick for a week, - then fine. It's tough but within the reach of a reputable author like him. I would be willing to help coach with the hope that this individual might go beyond self-promotion and write content about another notable topic not related to himself. I think with time that this individual will see that having a Wikipedia article isn't as great as first imagined. It gives the world a chance to vandalize ''your biography'' which wouldn't appeal to me. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I see no thread so I'll answer here. Well, it should be deleted if it's a red link, except in cases of very obvious notability like the Olympian from Mukwonago - that person will definitely eventually get an article by an Olympics fan. A case for notability for this individual could be made, but will that article be made by someone who doesn't have a conflict of interest? I doubt it. I suppose if Rod would make a nice article, free of [[WP:ADVERT|self-promotion]], written in a [[WP:NPOV|neutral]] language, with an encyclopedic tone, and get it to stick for a week, - then fine. It's tough but within the reach of a reputable author like him. I would be willing to help coach with the hope that this individual might go beyond self-promotion and write content about another notable topic not related to himself. I think with time that this individual will see that having a Wikipedia article isn't as great as first imagined. It gives the world a chance to vandalize ''your biography'' which wouldn't appeal to me. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
530889 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530887 +++$+++ 530888 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.265805660E09 +++$+++ Whoops... forgot to check back here for a reply. The anon hasn't re-added it, so I guess it's not an issue. And I guess I didn't write a one-liner on that article talk page. But at least it's been a couple of days since I blocked myself...-- +++$+++ ::Whoops... forgot to check back here for a reply. The anon hasn't re-added it, so I guess it's not an issue. And I guess I didn't write a one-liner on that article talk page. But at least it's been a couple of days since I blocked myself...--[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 04:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

268744 +++$+++ Skagedal +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268744 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-21 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.227310320E09 +++$+++ We all have the same goal of improving Wikipedia and covering the topic of depression in the best possible way. I admire your attention to detail, and I agree with many of the issues you have raised. But why not just simply state your objections, preferrably on just one place? I don't understand why you are so frustrated (as you have said). If your concerns are addressed, then you should strike the issue on FAC. If they are not addressed\u2014well, they will stay there, not striked-out, for the FA director to take into account. \/<tt> +++$+++ We all have the same goal of improving Wikipedia and covering the topic of depression in the best possible way. I admire your attention to detail, and I agree with many of the issues you have raised. But why not just simply state your objections, preferrably on just one place? I don't understand why you are so frustrated (as you have said). If your concerns are addressed, then you should strike the issue on FAC. If they are not addressed—well, they will stay there, not striked-out, for the FA director to take into account. /<tt>[[User:Skagedal|skagedal]]</tt>[[User_talk:Skagedal|<sup>...</sup>]] 15:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268745 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268744 +++$+++ 268744 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.227311460E09 +++$+++ I would not have to repeat myself if my comments were directly answered. However, from the beginning my comments have either been ignored or argued with on the FAC page, or answered with a change in subject. I have been personally attacked by Calisber in a rant on the FAC page. I have participated in many FACs and never have my comments not been responded to directly and in a timely fashion. Any response in this FAC I have received has been off topic and not responsive to my comment. This FAC has been a totally different experience than any other. I do not know how to get responses to my comments. What do you suggest, given that my talk page and FAC comments are ignored?  &mdash; +++$+++ :I would not have to repeat myself if my comments were directly answered. However, from the beginning my comments have either been ignored or argued with on the FAC page, or answered with a change in subject. I have been personally attacked by Calisber in a rant on the FAC page. I have participated in many FACs and never have my comments not been responded to directly and in a timely fashion. Any response in this FAC I have received has been off topic and not responsive to my comment. This FAC has been a totally different experience than any other. I do not know how to get responses to my comments. What do you suggest, given that my talk page and FAC comments are ignored?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268746 +++$+++ Skagedal +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268744 +++$+++ 268745 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.227312420E09 +++$+++ I don't know. At the FAC page, if I take as an example the first bunch of your comments, those under \"Mattisse 1\"\u2014all of those issues have been at least commented on by Casliber, most if not all of them seem resolved as well.  Still, none of them have been marked as \"done\" by you, as WP:FAC reccommends: ''Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed. To withdraw the objection, strike it out (with <nowiki><s> ... <\/s><\/nowiki>) rather than removing it. Alternately, reviewers may hide lengthy, resolved commentary in a cap template with a signature in the header [...]''. Maybe that gives the impression that you will never be satisfied...? \/<tt> +++$+++ ::I don't know. At the FAC page, if I take as an example the first bunch of your comments, those under "Mattisse 1"—all of those issues have been at least commented on by Casliber, most if not all of them seem resolved as well.  Still, none of them have been marked as "done" by you, as WP:FAC reccommends: ''Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed. To withdraw the objection, strike it out (with <nowiki><s> ... </s></nowiki>) rather than removing it. Alternately, reviewers may hide lengthy, resolved commentary in a cap template with a signature in the header [...]''. Maybe that gives the impression that you will never be satisfied...? /<tt>[[User:Skagedal|skagedal]]</tt>[[User_talk:Skagedal|<sup>...</sup>]] 16:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268747 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268744 +++$+++ 268746 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.227313200E09 +++$+++ He has not addressed my comments. Mostly he changed the subject to something irrelevant. I am now the fourth largest contributor to the article because I fixed many things myself. However, Calisber never addressed them and still has not addressed most of them as far as I know. The talk page became so cluttered, that I cannot find by own comments anymore. But I think, if you go back through the page, refactored as it has been, and some personal attacks on me removed, you will not find under my comments a direct response for Calisber relevant to my comment.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::He has not addressed my comments. Mostly he changed the subject to something irrelevant. I am now the fourth largest contributor to the article because I fixed many things myself. However, Calisber never addressed them and still has not addressed most of them as far as I know. The talk page became so cluttered, that I cannot find by own comments anymore. But I think, if you go back through the page, refactored as it has been, and some personal attacks on me removed, you will not find under my comments a direct response for Calisber relevant to my comment.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268748 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268744 +++$+++ 268747 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.227313320E09 +++$+++ However, I will go back through the page and strike any that he has addressed.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::However, I will go back through the page and strike any that he has addressed.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:22, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268749 +++$+++ Skagedal +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268744 +++$+++ 268748 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.227315300E09 +++$+++ I'm happy to hear that! \/<tt> +++$+++ :::::I'm happy to hear that! /<tt>[[User:Skagedal|skagedal]]</tt>[[User_talk:Skagedal|<sup>...</sup>]] 16:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268750 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268744 +++$+++ 268749 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.227315660E09 +++$+++ I have completed it for the most part now. So much was argued or not addressed directly, some was probably reworded for other reasons then my objections. At the time my objections did not result in the article change. But so much has been reworded since then for other reasons, that my complaints may have been taken care of for other reasons.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::I have completed it for the most part now. So much was argued or not addressed directly, some was probably reworded for other reasons then my objections. At the time my objections did not result in the article change. But so much has been reworded since then for other reasons, that my complaints may have been taken care of for other reasons.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

6601 +++$+++ Commodore Sloat +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-21 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.140594900E09 +++$+++ You twisted my words when you claimed that I wanted the Weekly Standard \"banned from public discourse.\"  I am not going to debate your ludicrous assertion that a weekly political rag is more reliable than daily news sources with real reporters on staff rather than \"commentators.\"  As for the Saddam tapes, please respond to my arguments where I made them if you think they are wrong; as it is you have conceded that the tapes most likely refer to 1990 and that Saddam says he warned us in 1989; you have asserted the nonsensical view that Saddam was referring to three years in the future.  I have not censored things Ron and you are just making ridiculous assertions; either back these up with evidence or back off.  The Saddam\/AQ page is a conspiracy theory and I have put in information on both sides as you are well aware; however, the balance of evidence in nearly every case points to no cooperation between the two (as you are also well aware).  The details have been debated to death on that talk page; you have had your say there, so it's disingenuous to bring up various examples out of context here to try to prove I am hurting wikipedia somehow by researching these things and insisting on accuracy.  The Russians did not help Iraq move WMD anywhere as the evidence shows; read the articles yourself.  Shaw is under FBI investigation for misuse of intelligence to enrich his friends with lucrative contracts - that makes him a criminal in my mind, yes (or at least a criminal suspect at this point).  And I don't have a strong POV there - I had never heard of Shaw until reading the articles that you put on the bibliography!  Anyway I have no interest in debating you on these points; it's pretty clear to me you have a tenuous grip on reality at best.  I know I won't convince you, and you won't convince me.  The point is not to convince each other but to collaborate as best as possible in creating accurate encyclopedic entries.-- +++$+++ You twisted my words when you claimed that I wanted the Weekly Standard "banned from public discourse."  I am not going to debate your ludicrous assertion that a weekly political rag is more reliable than daily news sources with real reporters on staff rather than "commentators."  As for the Saddam tapes, please respond to my arguments where I made them if you think they are wrong; as it is you have conceded that the tapes most likely refer to 1990 and that Saddam says he warned us in 1989; you have asserted the nonsensical view that Saddam was referring to three years in the future.  I have not censored things Ron and you are just making ridiculous assertions; either back these up with evidence or back off.  The Saddam/AQ page is a conspiracy theory and I have put in information on both sides as you are well aware; however, the balance of evidence in nearly every case points to no cooperation between the two (as you are also well aware).  The details have been debated to death on that talk page; you have had your say there, so it's disingenuous to bring up various examples out of context here to try to prove I am hurting wikipedia somehow by researching these things and insisting on accuracy.  The Russians did not help Iraq move WMD anywhere as the evidence shows; read the articles yourself.  Shaw is under FBI investigation for misuse of intelligence to enrich his friends with lucrative contracts - that makes him a criminal in my mind, yes (or at least a criminal suspect at this point).  And I don't have a strong POV there - I had never heard of Shaw until reading the articles that you put on the bibliography!  Anyway I have no interest in debating you on these points; it's pretty clear to me you have a tenuous grip on reality at best.  I know I won't convince you, and you won't convince me.  The point is not to convince each other but to collaborate as best as possible in creating accurate encyclopedic entries.--[[User:Commodore Sloat|csloat]] 23:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
6602 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6601 +++$+++ 6601 +++$+++ 2006-02-22 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.140599400E09 +++$+++ csloat, you continue to attack the Weekly Standard without basis.  Some of the most respected names in journalism write for that publication and your attacks against it are purely partisan.  My attacks on CBS, et al had to do with the way they manufactured stories.  The Saddam Tapes are thought to be from the mid-90s up to post-2000, not from 1990.  You continue to make a serious error when you think I have conceded a point merely because I quit talking to you about it.  It may be that work has called me away and I never got back to it or it may be that I have simply tired of talking to you.  I have told you repeatedly not to assume I have conceded anything just because I have not responded to you.  The truth is not established by the last man standing.  Your failure to consider the evidence allows you to continue a position that has long been debunked.  The assertions I have made about your deleting valid entries can be easily validated.  Knowing my ability to research and back up what I say, do you really want me to support these assertions?   I don't think so.  Your POV does not allow you to honestly evaluate the evidence of Russians moving the WMD.  The satellite images back up Shaw and so do the British.  Yet you fail to give any credence or value to this evidence.  It was nice of you to mention the fact I cited articles not favorable to Shaw.  Given that fact, I wonder why you have attacked me for POV?  Shaw has made charges against Doug Feith (you should like Shaw for that) and Feith's people have responded in kind. I do not know the full story but since none of Shaw's friends got any contracts, I doubt any criminal activity can be proven against Shaw. and whatever happened to \"innocent until proven guilty\" anyway?  Why doesn't John Shaw get the benefit of the doubt?  Just because he went public with the fact the Russians helped the Iraqis move their WMD?  Your POV is showing.  Now, I want to ask a favor of you.  Stop posting on my user talk page.  If you have something to say about one of my entries, say on the appropriate Talk page.   +++$+++ :csloat, you continue to attack the Weekly Standard without basis.  Some of the most respected names in journalism write for that publication and your attacks against it are purely partisan.  My attacks on CBS, et al had to do with the way they manufactured stories.  The Saddam Tapes are thought to be from the mid-90s up to post-2000, not from 1990.  You continue to make a serious error when you think I have conceded a point merely because I quit talking to you about it.  It may be that work has called me away and I never got back to it or it may be that I have simply tired of talking to you.  I have told you repeatedly not to assume I have conceded anything just because I have not responded to you.  The truth is not established by the last man standing.  Your failure to consider the evidence allows you to continue a position that has long been debunked.  The assertions I have made about your deleting valid entries can be easily validated.  Knowing my ability to research and back up what I say, do you really want me to support these assertions?   I don't think so.  Your POV does not allow you to honestly evaluate the evidence of Russians moving the WMD.  The satellite images back up Shaw and so do the British.  Yet you fail to give any credence or value to this evidence.  It was nice of you to mention the fact I cited articles not favorable to Shaw.  Given that fact, I wonder why you have attacked me for POV?  Shaw has made charges against Doug Feith (you should like Shaw for that) and Feith's people have responded in kind. I do not know the full story but since none of Shaw's friends got any contracts, I doubt any criminal activity can be proven against Shaw. and whatever happened to "innocent until proven guilty" anyway?  Why doesn't John Shaw get the benefit of the doubt?  Just because he went public with the fact the Russians helped the Iraqis move their WMD?  Your POV is showing.  Now, I want to ask a favor of you.  Stop posting on my user talk page.  If you have something to say about one of my entries, say on the appropriate Talk page.  [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 01:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

530890 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-10 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.265806020E09 +++$+++ I noticed that a new user added a redlink for [[Norm Nelson]] at [[List of people from Racine, Wisconsin]]. After a quick google search, it appears that the guy was an early NASCAR champion from Racine.  Thought you might be interested, if you were looking for new articles to write.  [http:\/\/www.superbirdclub.com\/files\/Norm_Nelson_USAC_Stock_Car_Champion.pdf Ref 1], [http:\/\/www.nascar.com\/2010\/news\/features\/01\/30\/today.in.history\/index.html ref 2], [http:\/\/thirdturn.wikia.com\/wiki\/Norm_Nelson ref 3]. Cheers -- +++$+++ I noticed that a new user added a redlink for [[Norm Nelson]] at [[List of people from Racine, Wisconsin]]. After a quick google search, it appears that the guy was an early NASCAR champion from Racine.  Thought you might be interested, if you were looking for new articles to write.  [http://www.superbirdclub.com/files/Norm_Nelson_USAC_Stock_Car_Champion.pdf Ref 1], [http://www.nascar.com/2010/news/features/01/30/today.in.history/index.html ref 2], [http://thirdturn.wikia.com/wiki/Norm_Nelson ref 3]. Cheers --[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 04:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
530891 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530890 +++$+++ 530890 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.265808660E09 +++$+++ I was going to correct you and say that he was a USAC Stock Car champ instead of NASCAR, but I see he did win a NASCAR race. USAC Stock Car was a big deal in the 1970s. Those drivers could come into NASCAR and compete for wins. I wrote articles on most of the other USAC champions from the 1970s and at least one was a DYK article. I'll write one for him, so you can leave the link on Racine's article. I didn't know he was a Wisconsinite or I would have done it sooner! The third turn is a NASCAR Wikia and definitely not a reliable source. The guy that founded it and has done much of the work used to help at WikiProject NASCAR. He's still old school and doesn't show sources. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I was going to correct you and say that he was a USAC Stock Car champ instead of NASCAR, but I see he did win a NASCAR race. USAC Stock Car was a big deal in the 1970s. Those drivers could come into NASCAR and compete for wins. I wrote articles on most of the other USAC champions from the 1970s and at least one was a DYK article. I'll write one for him, so you can leave the link on Racine's article. I didn't know he was a Wisconsinite or I would have done it sooner! The third turn is a NASCAR Wikia and definitely not a reliable source. The guy that founded it and has done much of the work used to help at WikiProject NASCAR. He's still old school and doesn't show sources. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
530892 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530890 +++$+++ 530891 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.265811000E09 +++$+++ This is why I didn't try to write the article myself; I've never even heard of the USAC ;^) Yeah, I could tell that wikia site isn't a RS, but I figured it could be used as a starting point to find RS's&mdash;googling the birthdate listed there for a newspaper article, that sort of thing. I'll add what I can. Thanks, -- +++$+++ ::This is why I didn't try to write the article myself; I've never even heard of the USAC ;^) Yeah, I could tell that wikia site isn't a RS, but I figured it could be used as a starting point to find RS's&mdash;googling the birthdate listed there for a newspaper article, that sort of thing. I'll add what I can. Thanks, --[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 06:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
530893 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530890 +++$+++ 530892 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.265811720E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I have plenty of solid sources. I usually end up finding the Third Turn's article and finding reliable sources for it. Fyi, USAC is the sanctioning body that sanctioned IndyCar races (like the Indy 500) for many decades. They had stock cars for a long time and their drivers were on par with NASCAR drivers until the mid to late 1970s. You're solidly in my wheelhouse with this topic and I'm very interested to write the article. You need not worry about me needing help to develop it. I'm sure the article should appear on the New Art Bot searchlist for Wisconsin once I add it. With DYK being very backed up, I'm sitting on articles in my sandboxes and waiting a bit for the number of submissions to decline. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Thank you, I have plenty of solid sources. I usually end up finding the Third Turn's article and finding reliable sources for it. Fyi, USAC is the sanctioning body that sanctioned IndyCar races (like the Indy 500) for many decades. They had stock cars for a long time and their drivers were on par with NASCAR drivers until the mid to late 1970s. You're solidly in my wheelhouse with this topic and I'm very interested to write the article. You need not worry about me needing help to develop it. I'm sure the article should appear on the New Art Bot searchlist for Wisconsin once I add it. With DYK being very backed up, I'm sitting on articles in my sandboxes and waiting a bit for the number of submissions to decline. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 06:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
530894 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530890 +++$+++ 530893 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.265813040E09 +++$+++ Sounds good. Happy editing!-- +++$+++ ::::Sounds good. Happy editing!--[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 06:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

6604 +++$+++ Commodore Sloat +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-28 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.143600480E09 +++$+++ Ron I must again implore you to stop disrupting wikipedia.  You keep hurling personal insults -- that I am censoring you or stalking you -- meanwhile you are censoring valid information about the only real study of the OIF Documents in existence.  You also made it clear in your requests that other people \"come and join the fun\" bashing me and Ryan that you consider all of this a sort of pissing contest.  It is not.  This is an encyclopedia.  I realize you don't agree with the things I have to say here but my goal is to keep wikipedia accurate and well sourced.  My goal is not to play games with you or anyone else.  I ask that you treat wikipedia as an encyclopedia, not as a playground.-- +++$+++ Ron I must again implore you to stop disrupting wikipedia.  You keep hurling personal insults -- that I am censoring you or stalking you -- meanwhile you are censoring valid information about the only real study of the OIF Documents in existence.  You also made it clear in your requests that other people "come and join the fun" bashing me and Ryan that you consider all of this a sort of pissing contest.  It is not.  This is an encyclopedia.  I realize you don't agree with the things I have to say here but my goal is to keep wikipedia accurate and well sourced.  My goal is not to play games with you or anyone else.  I ask that you treat wikipedia as an encyclopedia, not as a playground.--[[User:Commodore Sloat|csloat]] 18:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
6605 +++$+++ TDC +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6604 +++$+++ 6604 +++$+++ 2006-03-29 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.143695160E09 +++$+++ Sloat, you might look in the mirror when alleging that people are in violation of [[WP:C]]. As far as your self proclaimed \"goal\", two words come to mind: Wayne Madsen. Toodles.  +++$+++ : Sloat, you might look in the mirror when alleging that people are in violation of [[WP:C]]. As far as your self proclaimed "goal", two words come to mind: Wayne Madsen. Toodles. [[User:TDC|Torturous Devastating Cudgel]] 21:06, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
6606 +++$+++ William M. Connolley +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6604 +++$+++ 6604 +++$+++ 2006-03-28 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.143603720E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Octagon-warning.png|left|30px| ]]You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. <!-- Template:3RR3 --> The duration of the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User:RonCram&action=edit&section=new block] is 24 hours.  +++$+++ :[[Image:Octagon-warning.png|left|30px| ]]You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. <!-- Template:3RR3 --> The duration of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User:RonCram&action=edit&section=new block] is 24 hours. [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 19:42, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

268751 +++$+++ Skagedal +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-21 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.227340380E09 +++$+++ Earlier today, I said [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Major_depressive_disorder&diff=253192086&oldid=253191269 this]. You replied with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Major_depressive_disorder&diff=253197166&oldid=253194923 this], clearly without reading what you replied to, as evidenced by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Major_depressive_disorder&diff=253291274&oldid=253290938 this]. Yes, Tony made that suggestion, go to the FAC page and search for Tony, you'll find it easily. Also [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Major_depressive_disorder&diff=253290938&oldid=253289650 here] it looks like you are saying something to me that seems to be directed towards someone else. I have not said anything about [[WP:IAR]] or disregarded [[WP:MEDRS]]. \/<tt> +++$+++ Earlier today, I said [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Major_depressive_disorder&diff=253192086&oldid=253191269 this]. You replied with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Major_depressive_disorder&diff=253197166&oldid=253194923 this], clearly without reading what you replied to, as evidenced by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Major_depressive_disorder&diff=253291274&oldid=253290938 this]. Yes, Tony made that suggestion, go to the FAC page and search for Tony, you'll find it easily. Also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Major_depressive_disorder&diff=253290938&oldid=253289650 here] it looks like you are saying something to me that seems to be directed towards someone else. I have not said anything about [[WP:IAR]] or disregarded [[WP:MEDRS]]. /<tt>[[User:Skagedal|skagedal]]</tt>[[User_talk:Skagedal|<sup>...</sup>]] 23:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268752 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268751 +++$+++ 268751 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.227341100E09 +++$+++ Jeezz, you mean a month ago? I don't fault myself for not remembering that! You guys are an irrational group of people! Thank god, none of my other FAC experiences have been like this. Today I gave my support on [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Faith Leech]] after having offered suggestions that were accepted\u2014a much more typical experience. This Major depression disorder FAC has been horrible. I am not used to such unreasonableness.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Jeezz, you mean a month ago? I don't fault myself for not remembering that! You guys are an irrational group of people! Thank god, none of my other FAC experiences have been like this. Today I gave my support on [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Faith Leech]] after having offered suggestions that were accepted—a much more typical experience. This Major depression disorder FAC has been horrible. I am not used to such unreasonableness.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
268753 +++$+++ Skagedal +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268751 +++$+++ 268752 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.227341640E09 +++$+++ I did not say you should have remembered that. I said it would have been nice if you had read what I wrote (today) before you replied (today). Whatever, I guess I'm irrational. Thank you for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Major_depressive_disorder&diff=253294453&oldid=253291274], apology accepted. Have a good weekend. \/<tt> +++$+++ ::I did not say you should have remembered that. I said it would have been nice if you had read what I wrote (today) before you replied (today). Whatever, I guess I'm irrational. Thank you for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Major_depressive_disorder&diff=253294453&oldid=253291274], apology accepted. Have a good weekend. /<tt>[[User:Skagedal|skagedal]]</tt>[[User_talk:Skagedal|<sup>...</sup>]] 00:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
268754 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268751 +++$+++ 268753 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.227341880E09 +++$+++ Ah, yes. And it would have been nice if I had been accorded some respect in reply to my suggestions. In a perfect world... &mdash; +++$+++ :::Ah, yes. And it would have been nice if I had been accorded some respect in reply to my suggestions. In a perfect world... &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
268755 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268751 +++$+++ 268754 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.227343020E09 +++$+++ Also, your signature is such that it just doesn't register. Sorry!  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Also, your signature is such that it just doesn't register. Sorry!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

530897 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530897 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-15 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.266294420E09 +++$+++ Excuse Me Royal Broil,but can you help me become a administrator on Wikipedia.Thank You. +++$+++ Excuse Me Royal Broil,but can you help me become a administrator on Wikipedia.Thank You.[[User:Nascar1996|Nascar1996]] ([[User talk:Nascar1996|talk]]) 20:27, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
530898 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530897 +++$+++ 530897 +++$+++ 2010-02-16 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.266313320E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, you're not even close to being ready. I say that with all due respect. To be an administrator, you need to wait until others feel you are ready. Are you expected to be very well rounded and need to be able to understand how almost everything works in here - like deletion, policies, guidelines. You are also expected to be versed in creating content at higher levels, including versed in citing sources. A person ready for adminship wouldn't need to ask questions like you did about importance of articles and if something real far away from Good Article status like Jimmie Johnson. Adminship is something that you earn in the long haul with lots of sweat. I got it long after I had given up on it ever happening. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I'm sorry, you're not even close to being ready. I say that with all due respect. To be an administrator, you need to wait until others feel you are ready. Are you expected to be very well rounded and need to be able to understand how almost everything works in here - like deletion, policies, guidelines. You are also expected to be versed in creating content at higher levels, including versed in citing sources. A person ready for adminship wouldn't need to ask questions like you did about importance of articles and if something real far away from Good Article status like Jimmie Johnson. Adminship is something that you earn in the long haul with lots of sweat. I got it long after I had given up on it ever happening. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:42, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
530899 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530897 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-16 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.266317100E09 +++$+++ I hope that you don't log out and vandalize. That's a good way to guarantee that you'd never become an admin. Please read [[WP:GA]] to learn more about Good Articles. It's a way for someone to \"certify\" that the article is relatively well written using reliable sources. It's not extremely difficult like [[WP:FA|Featured Articles]] but it's pretty difficult for an average person to do. Having Good Article status does greatly set it apart from the overwhelming majority of the articles. They are a big deal. Big enough that most people who have spent the time to create one will display something on their userpage. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::I hope that you don't log out and vandalize. That's a good way to guarantee that you'd never become an admin. Please read [[WP:GA]] to learn more about Good Articles. It's a way for someone to "certify" that the article is relatively well written using reliable sources. It's not extremely difficult like [[WP:FA|Featured Articles]] but it's pretty difficult for an average person to do. Having Good Article status does greatly set it apart from the overwhelming majority of the articles. They are a big deal. Big enough that most people who have spent the time to create one will display something on their userpage. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

6611 +++$+++ Evensong +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-29 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.146313500E09 +++$+++ Michael Scheuer's credibility is important to csloat.  That's why he is attempting to minimize Scheuer's inconsistent comments.  I suggest that you remove the bullet point section entirely, and focus on the criticism section.  Also, cite the book corresponding to quotes.  As it stands now, the page cited in the article are unclear as to what book they reference.  Csloat is trying to beat you with a structure argument, (e.g. repitition, redendancy, etc.)  Remind him that you are citing facts and that it is up to the reader to decide the implication of those facts.  +++$+++ Michael Scheuer's credibility is important to csloat.  That's why he is attempting to minimize Scheuer's inconsistent comments.  I suggest that you remove the bullet point section entirely, and focus on the criticism section.  Also, cite the book corresponding to quotes.  As it stands now, the page cited in the article are unclear as to what book they reference.  Csloat is trying to beat you with a structure argument, (e.g. repitition, redendancy, etc.)  Remind him that you are citing facts and that it is up to the reader to decide the implication of those facts. [[User:Evensong|Evensong]] 05:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
6612 +++$+++ Commodore Sloat +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6611 +++$+++ 6611 +++$+++ 2006-04-29 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.146378900E09 +++$+++ Michael Scheuer's credibility is not important to me; accuracy is.  I am not attempting to minimize anything; I am simply insisting that the article reflect the notability of Scheuer's comments accurately.  Please don't put words or intentions into my mouth, Mr. song.-- +++$+++ :Michael Scheuer's credibility is not important to me; accuracy is.  I am not attempting to minimize anything; I am simply insisting that the article reflect the notability of Scheuer's comments accurately.  Please don't put words or intentions into my mouth, Mr. song.--[[User:Commodore Sloat|csloat]] 23:35, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
6613 +++$+++ Evensong +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6611 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-05 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.146823800E09 +++$+++ Get a grip on the issue, Csloat.  Scheuer made repeated statements on the issue.  RonCam gets to bring those repeated statements out to make his point.  All of which are based on fact.  Your deleting them claiming that it is RonCam, not Scheuer, that repeats himself just will not cut it.  +++$+++ :::Get a grip on the issue, Csloat.  Scheuer made repeated statements on the issue.  RonCam gets to bring those repeated statements out to make his point.  All of which are based on fact.  Your deleting them claiming that it is RonCam, not Scheuer, that repeats himself just will not cut it. [[User:Evensong|Evensong]] 03:10, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
6614 +++$+++ Commodore Sloat +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6611 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-05 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.146898740E09 +++$+++ Good point, Evensong.  I guess Wikipedia should simply reprint every word of Scheuer's book.  Or are you just suggesting that the one chapter where he makes these repetitive comments should be duplicated here word for word?  You're the one who needs a \"grip.\"  Here's a thought - why don't you actually read the book yourself, and then tell us what you think it is about?  Anyway, let's take future comments on this to the Scheuer page; I don't think it belongs on Ron's user page.-- +++$+++ ::::Good point, Evensong.  I guess Wikipedia should simply reprint every word of Scheuer's book.  Or are you just suggesting that the one chapter where he makes these repetitive comments should be duplicated here word for word?  You're the one who needs a "grip."  Here's a thought - why don't you actually read the book yourself, and then tell us what you think it is about?  Anyway, let's take future comments on this to the Scheuer page; I don't think it belongs on Ron's user page.--[[User:Commodore Sloat|csloat]] 23:59, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
6615 +++$+++ CSTAR +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6611 +++$+++ 6612 +++$+++ 2006-05-01 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.146469260E09 +++$+++ I responded Re this subject on my talk page.-- +++$+++ :: I responded Re this subject on my talk page.--[[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 00:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

268756 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-21 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.227318240E09 +++$+++ is unspecific and made without supplying evidence. I am offended, as one of the supports, to have my review contribution diminished by this broad allegation. I request you strike that text and apologise.  +++$+++ is unspecific and made without supplying evidence. I am offended, as one of the supports, to have my review contribution diminished by this broad allegation. I request you strike that text and apologise. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 17:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268757 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.227318840E09 +++$+++ My apologies if anyone was offended. I was merely quoting from the last \"Support\". I think I am owed an apology for the multiple personal attacks on me by \"Cas\" and Cosmic Latte. &mdash; +++$+++ :::My apologies if anyone was offended. I was merely quoting from the last "Support". I think I am owed an apology for the multiple personal attacks on me by "Cas" and Cosmic Latte. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268758 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.227319440E09 +++$+++ Well, you'll have to take that up with them on their talk pages. However, your offending remarks have not been struck through. They will remain in the FAC archive long after your talk page is archived and forgotten. I repeat my request that you strike that text.  +++$+++ ::::Well, you'll have to take that up with them on their talk pages. However, your offending remarks have not been struck through. They will remain in the FAC archive long after your talk page is archived and forgotten. I repeat my request that you strike that text. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268759 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.227320100E09 +++$+++ No one has struck through their personal attacks against me. Although \"Cas\" apologized briefly for his worst rant against me, he has subsequently made more personal attacks against me and neither apologized or struck out. Why should this be a one way street? Why does not Cosmic Latte  have to apologize for accusing me of making personal attacks and [[Ad hominem]] ?attacks? Your request seems strangely biased. Can you not be objective?  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::No one has struck through their personal attacks against me. Although "Cas" apologized briefly for his worst rant against me, he has subsequently made more personal attacks against me and neither apologized or struck out. Why should this be a one way street? Why does not Cosmic Latte  have to apologize for accusing me of making personal attacks and [[Ad hominem]] ?attacks? Your request seems strangely biased. Can you not be objective?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268760 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.227319680E09 +++$+++ I am at a loss why you would take a quotation I made from the last support for [[Major depressive disorder]] personally. I know you have defended \"Cas\", but this seems a little off base. Why don't you do another one of those comparisons on how much the article has changed since its nomination. Me, Snowradio and SandyGeorgia are now the fourth, fifth and sixth highest contributors to the article.[http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&page=Major+depressive+disorder&since=&until=&grouped=on&hideminor=on&order=-edit_count&max=100&order=-edit_count&format=html] Paul Gene, the third highest, has not contributed since the FAC nomination.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::I am at a loss why you would take a quotation I made from the last support for [[Major depressive disorder]] personally. I know you have defended "Cas", but this seems a little off base. Why don't you do another one of those comparisons on how much the article has changed since its nomination. Me, Snowradio and SandyGeorgia are now the fourth, fifth and sixth highest contributors to the article.[http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&page=Major+depressive+disorder&since=&until=&grouped=on&hideminor=on&order=-edit_count&max=100&order=-edit_count&format=html] Paul Gene, the third highest, has not contributed since the FAC nomination.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268761 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268756 +++$+++ 268756 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.227321660E09 +++$+++ As for your comment about others not apologising, that's no excuse for not behaving honourably yourself. You ask \"can you not be objective?\". Well, if one of them had offended me, I'd be on their talk page too. They haven't. I think you feel that me criticising you for making offending remarks should be balanced by doing the same for the others. The difference here is I'm only interested in any remarks that offended me. What you guys say about each other isn't my concern.  +++$+++ :As for your comment about others not apologising, that's no excuse for not behaving honourably yourself. You ask "can you not be objective?". Well, if one of them had offended me, I'd be on their talk page too. They haven't. I think you feel that me criticising you for making offending remarks should be balanced by doing the same for the others. The difference here is I'm only interested in any remarks that offended me. What you guys say about each other isn't my concern. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268762 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268756 +++$+++ 268761 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.227322200E09 +++$+++ All the subsequent attacks on me were for personally attacking the particular editor who made that comment. You seem to be the only editor who takes it personally and generalized the comment beyond that particular editor's \"Support\". You are alone in that, so perhaps you are being a bit oversensitive. I already apologized to \"anyone who was offended\" so that includes you. I think you are going overboard in your defense of \"Cas\" here. &mdash; +++$+++ ::All the subsequent attacks on me were for personally attacking the particular editor who made that comment. You seem to be the only editor who takes it personally and generalized the comment beyond that particular editor's "Support". You are alone in that, so perhaps you are being a bit oversensitive. I already apologized to "anyone who was offended" so that includes you. I think you are going overboard in your defense of "Cas" here. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268763 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268756 +++$+++ 268762 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.227324060E09 +++$+++ Am I misinterpreting that sentence? To me it reads \"Many editors who support this article do so at least partly because they owe Casliber a favour.\" You were the one who generalised it with the words \"common\" and \"supports\". I'm not trying to help or defend Casliber. Stop bringing him into this. You made a sweeping allegation. Retract it please.   +++$+++ :::Am I misinterpreting that sentence? To me it reads "Many editors who support this article do so at least partly because they owe Casliber a favour." You were the one who generalised it with the words "common" and "supports". I'm not trying to help or defend Casliber. Stop bringing him into this. You made a sweeping allegation. Retract it please.  [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268764 +++$+++ Skagedal +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268756 +++$+++ 268762 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.227324900E09 +++$+++ For the record Mattisse, I interpret what you said the same way Colin does. \/<tt> +++$+++ :::For the record Mattisse, I interpret what you said the same way Colin does. /<tt>[[User:Skagedal|skagedal]]</tt>[[User_talk:Skagedal|<sup>...</sup>]] 19:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
268765 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268756 +++$+++ 268764 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.227341460E09 +++$+++ I am afraid I can't take you guys seriously anymore! This must be all a joke. Wow. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I am afraid I can't take you guys seriously anymore! This must be all a joke. Wow. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

530902 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-17 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.266457080E09 +++$+++ I like the article about the La Crosse Speeway. It was well written. There are 2 new articles that came up involving WP-Wisconsin: [[McFarlandLand]] atheme park and the Kipp Stoneman Experience. I googled both of them and check the McFarland Chamber of Commerce and nothing came up. Why do I think it is a hoax???Many thanks= +++$+++ I like the article about the La Crosse Speeway. It was well written. There are 2 new articles that came up involving WP-Wisconsin: [[McFarlandLand]] atheme park and the Kipp Stoneman Experience. I googled both of them and check the McFarland Chamber of Commerce and nothing came up. Why do I think it is a hoax???Many thanks=[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 17:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
530903 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530902 +++$+++ 530902 +++$+++ 2010-02-17 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.266459060E09 +++$+++ Clearly that ride exists. http:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/pub\/kipp-stoneman\/15\/306\/b2 Oh wait... that's ''Kipp Stoneman's Experience'' not ''Kipp Stoneman Experience''. So close.... ;^) -- +++$+++ :Clearly that ride exists. http://www.linkedin.com/pub/kipp-stoneman/15/306/b2 Oh wait... that's ''Kipp Stoneman's Experience'' not ''Kipp Stoneman Experience''. So close.... ;^) --[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 18:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
530904 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530902 +++$+++ 530902 +++$+++ 2010-02-17 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.266459480E09 +++$+++ You do need a sense of humor. Thanks- +++$+++ :You do need a sense of humor. Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 18:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
530905 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530902 +++$+++ 530902 +++$+++ 2010-02-18 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.266528720E09 +++$+++ Hope you get DYK for the La Crosse Speedway=I was there once-Thanks- +++$+++ :Hope you get DYK for the La Crosse Speedway=I was there once-Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

530907 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530907 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-19 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.266614340E09 +++$+++ Hey, I've tried nominating an article to DYK for the first time: [[George Hampel (legislator)]], [[Template talk:Did you know#Articles created.2Fexpanded on February 19]]. (Orangemike created, I expanded). If you have any advice on how to go about the process, I'd be eager to hear it. Thanks! -- +++$+++ Hey, I've tried nominating an article to DYK for the first time: [[George Hampel (legislator)]], [[Template talk:Did you know#Articles created.2Fexpanded on February 19]]. (Orangemike created, I expanded). If you have any advice on how to go about the process, I'd be eager to hear it. Thanks! --[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 13:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
530908 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530907 +++$+++ 530907 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.266667980E09 +++$+++ Looks like you got it figured out! The reference only marginally supports the hook - it's about a closure meeting that didn't happen. I'm shocked that you got asked about the date of death! There is no one alive who's 125 years old! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Looks like you got it figured out! The reference only marginally supports the hook - it's about a closure meeting that didn't happen. I'm shocked that you got asked about the date of death! There is no one alive who's 125 years old! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
530909 +++$+++ BaronLarf +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530907 +++$+++ 530908 +++$+++ 2010-02-21 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.266778980E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I eventually found that date of death. I also added two more references and slightly tweaked the wording so the hook has more support now. Thanks, -- +++$+++ ::Yeah, I eventually found that date of death. I also added two more references and slightly tweaked the wording so the hook has more support now. Thanks, --[[User:BaronLarf|Baron]][[User talk:BaronLarf|Larf]] 11:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

6620 +++$+++ Commodore Sloat +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-13 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.150201380E09 +++$+++ I have never stalked you Ron.  Please remove your comment about that on 172's talk page.  As you are well aware, I had started that conversation on the [[Talk:Saddam Hussein]] page.  When 172 participated on the page, you took your complaint to his talk page (which I was well aware of, since both are on my watchlist).  There was no stalking involved.  If you want a private conversation with someone, send them an email.  Don't feign offense just because known troll [[User:TDC]] jumped down my throat about it.  That conversation was about edits to the [[Saddam Hussein]] page, not about some private matter.  It is your decision if you want to be a follower instead of a leader, Ron, but if that's the choice you wish to make, I'd advise you not to follow known trolls.-- +++$+++ I have never stalked you Ron.  Please remove your comment about that on 172's talk page.  As you are well aware, I had started that conversation on the [[Talk:Saddam Hussein]] page.  When 172 participated on the page, you took your complaint to his talk page (which I was well aware of, since both are on my watchlist).  There was no stalking involved.  If you want a private conversation with someone, send them an email.  Don't feign offense just because known troll [[User:TDC]] jumped down my throat about it.  That conversation was about edits to the [[Saddam Hussein]] page, not about some private matter.  It is your decision if you want to be a follower instead of a leader, Ron, but if that's the choice you wish to make, I'd advise you not to follow known trolls.--[[User:Commodore Sloat|csloat]] 05:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
6621 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6620 +++$+++ 6620 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.150216920E09 +++$+++ csloat, you constantly show up on almost any page I edit.  Why would you have a User Talk page on your watch list?  Why would you feel you need to comment in a conversation between 172 and myself?  Do you think 172 cannot hold up his end of a conversation?  Your harassment is going too far.  TDC may have been the first to talk about your stalking but I noticed it long before he mentioned it.  At first I chalked it up to our both being interested in the same subjects.  When you followed me to subjects farther afield, it made me uncomfortable.  But when you follow me to a User Talk page, that is truly over the line.  I would advise you to take some time off from wikipedia. +++$+++ :csloat, you constantly show up on almost any page I edit.  Why would you have a User Talk page on your watch list?  Why would you feel you need to comment in a conversation between 172 and myself?  Do you think 172 cannot hold up his end of a conversation?  Your harassment is going too far.  TDC may have been the first to talk about your stalking but I noticed it long before he mentioned it.  At first I chalked it up to our both being interested in the same subjects.  When you followed me to subjects farther afield, it made me uncomfortable.  But when you follow me to a User Talk page, that is truly over the line.  I would advise you to take some time off from wikipedia.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 09:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
6622 +++$+++ Commodore Sloat +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6620 +++$+++ 6621 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.150217580E09 +++$+++ I have every user talk page that I have edited on my talk list, as do you.  Don't play dumb.  I commented because it dealt with edits to the [[Saddam Hussein]] page.  I had engaged you in talk on that page but you refused to support your arguments there, as you are well aware.  I never stalked you, as you are well aware.  If you are confused, you might look at [[Wikipedia:Harassment]].  Specifically note the following: '''\"This does not include checking up on an editor to fix errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, nor does it mean reading a user's contribution log; those logs are public for good reason.\"'''  In fact I did not even do those things; I simply responded on topic to a discussion about the Saddam Hussein article, specifically about passages in that article that we both had been editing.  You are simply [[Wikipedia:Wikilawyering|wikilawyering]], raising phony harrassment charges as a red herring rather than actually debate the issues, since you know you are wrong about the issues and will lose the debate.  If it makes you uncomfortable to lose debates, Ron, then stop advocating indefensible positions in them.  I would advise you not to tell me what to do.-- +++$+++ ::I have every user talk page that I have edited on my talk list, as do you.  Don't play dumb.  I commented because it dealt with edits to the [[Saddam Hussein]] page.  I had engaged you in talk on that page but you refused to support your arguments there, as you are well aware.  I never stalked you, as you are well aware.  If you are confused, you might look at [[Wikipedia:Harassment]].  Specifically note the following: '''"This does not include checking up on an editor to fix errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, nor does it mean reading a user's contribution log; those logs are public for good reason."'''  In fact I did not even do those things; I simply responded on topic to a discussion about the Saddam Hussein article, specifically about passages in that article that we both had been editing.  You are simply [[Wikipedia:Wikilawyering|wikilawyering]], raising phony harrassment charges as a red herring rather than actually debate the issues, since you know you are wrong about the issues and will lose the debate.  If it makes you uncomfortable to lose debates, Ron, then stop advocating indefensible positions in them.  I would advise you not to tell me what to do.--[[User:Commodore Sloat|csloat]] 09:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
6623 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6620 +++$+++ 6622 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.150218420E09 +++$+++ You are wrong.  I do not have every User Talk page I have edited on my watchlist.  My own Talk page is on my watchlist and that is all.  What \"error\" of mine did you think was possible or pertinent on 172's Talk page?  Why would you feel it necessary for you to insert yourself into our conversation?  This is bad behavior, csloat.  I would advise you to drop the issue and never do it again.  Making a big deal out of this only makes it worse for you. I am willing to debate the issues as I have time.  I actually have to spend some time working.  And you know full well that when I am not editing for days or weeks that it is because I am working on a time consuming project not because I have lost an argument.  +++$+++ :::You are wrong.  I do not have every User Talk page I have edited on my watchlist.  My own Talk page is on my watchlist and that is all.  What "error" of mine did you think was possible or pertinent on 172's Talk page?  Why would you feel it necessary for you to insert yourself into our conversation?  This is bad behavior, csloat.  I would advise you to drop the issue and never do it again.  Making a big deal out of this only makes it worse for you. I am willing to debate the issues as I have time.  I actually have to spend some time working.  And you know full well that when I am not editing for days or weeks that it is because I am working on a time consuming project not because I have lost an argument. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 10:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
6624 +++$+++ Commodore Sloat +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6620 +++$+++ 6623 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.150220640E09 +++$+++ Well perhaps you don't have the pages you edit on your watchlist, but I do.  The error of yours is in continuing to defend your intellectually bankrupt position on Saddam and al-Qaeda.  You lost the argument on that page, so you try to stick your conspiracy theories on the Saddam page.  Then when you are losing the debate on the Saddam page, you take it to 172's talk page.  I don't understand what is \"bad behavior\" about responding to arguments relevant to the discussion that I was a participant in.  I am not the one making a big deal out of it; you brought it up; you pretended to have your feelings hurt; you disingenuously accused me of stalking.  I did nothing but participate in a discussion about Saddam.  You may be working on a project but that has nothing to do with the fact that you have lost this argument over and over Ron.  It is ok to lose arguments; I suggest you just move on.  If you have interesting theories about Saddam and al-Qaeda, start a blog.  But please stop trying to impose your theories on an encyclopedia when they are not backed up by evidence in the real world.  Thanks.-- +++$+++ ::::Well perhaps you don't have the pages you edit on your watchlist, but I do.  The error of yours is in continuing to defend your intellectually bankrupt position on Saddam and al-Qaeda.  You lost the argument on that page, so you try to stick your conspiracy theories on the Saddam page.  Then when you are losing the debate on the Saddam page, you take it to 172's talk page.  I don't understand what is "bad behavior" about responding to arguments relevant to the discussion that I was a participant in.  I am not the one making a big deal out of it; you brought it up; you pretended to have your feelings hurt; you disingenuously accused me of stalking.  I did nothing but participate in a discussion about Saddam.  You may be working on a project but that has nothing to do with the fact that you have lost this argument over and over Ron.  It is ok to lose arguments; I suggest you just move on.  If you have interesting theories about Saddam and al-Qaeda, start a blog.  But please stop trying to impose your theories on an encyclopedia when they are not backed up by evidence in the real world.  Thanks.--[[User:Commodore Sloat|csloat]] 10:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
6625 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6620 +++$+++ 6624 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.150221420E09 +++$+++ I have not lost the argument. I will be returning to the Saddam and al-Qaeda page.  You know as well as I do that the [[Operation Iraqi Freedom documents]] are adding new evidence to the discussion and changing people's minds, including 9\/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey.  Returning to the subject of your bad behavior: I was not speaking to you.  I was talking to 172.  To insert yourself into a conversation you were not a part of is rude and uncalled for.  If you do not understand that, I do not know how to help you.  If I had wanted you to be a part of our conversation, I would have asked 172 the question on the article Talk page.  Oh, and I think you misunderstood me earlier.  I did not say I never lose arguments.  I did say that I do not run and hide if I lose one.  I know that is one of your fantasies but it simply is not true.  This is the end of this discussion.  Anything else you post on my Talk page I will delete to save you from any further embarassment.  +++$+++ :::::I have not lost the argument. I will be returning to the Saddam and al-Qaeda page.  You know as well as I do that the [[Operation Iraqi Freedom documents]] are adding new evidence to the discussion and changing people's minds, including 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey.  Returning to the subject of your bad behavior: I was not speaking to you.  I was talking to 172.  To insert yourself into a conversation you were not a part of is rude and uncalled for.  If you do not understand that, I do not know how to help you.  If I had wanted you to be a part of our conversation, I would have asked 172 the question on the article Talk page.  Oh, and I think you misunderstood me earlier.  I did not say I never lose arguments.  I did say that I do not run and hide if I lose one.  I know that is one of your fantasies but it simply is not true.  This is the end of this discussion.  Anything else you post on my Talk page I will delete to save you from any further embarassment. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 10:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

268766 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-22 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.227391560E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/Major_depressive_disorder&diff=prev&oldid=252986744]. I am curious, which diffs do you consider to be personal attacks? Please supply them, and we can discuss them, or please just stop referring to it\/them. Cheers,  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Major_depressive_disorder&diff=prev&oldid=252986744]. I am curious, which diffs do you consider to be personal attacks? Please supply them, and we can discuss them, or please just stop referring to it/them. Cheers, [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 14:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
268767 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268766 +++$+++ 268766 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.227398580E09 +++$+++ As I said above, I have participated in many FACs, (eg [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Faith Leech]] yesterday where my suggestions were treated with respect and I registered a \"Support\"). Never have I been treated the way I have on the [[Major depressive disorder]] FAC by you and Cosmic Latte. In any case, I refuse to be intimidated by such treatment. I will not be driven off. I may decide not to continue as I did once before, prompting your \"spiteful\" comment about me. If I leave it will be again, it will be because I feel too disgusted to continue, not because of any attempts to drive me off.   &mdash; +++$+++ :As I said above, I have participated in many FACs, (eg [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Faith Leech]] yesterday where my suggestions were treated with respect and I registered a "Support"). Never have I been treated the way I have on the [[Major depressive disorder]] FAC by you and Cosmic Latte. In any case, I refuse to be intimidated by such treatment. I will not be driven off. I may decide not to continue as I did once before, prompting your "spiteful" comment about me. If I leave it will be again, it will be because I feel too disgusted to continue, not because of any attempts to drive me off.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

268768 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268768 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-22 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.227419880E09 +++$+++ Clearer now? Cheers,  +++$+++ Clearer now? Cheers, [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 21:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
268769 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268768 +++$+++ 268768 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.227420600E09 +++$+++ Not really. I originally assumed the article was well referenced. It was only when I started to look closer that I was startled to find all the mistakes. I have crossed out all of the issues you have taken care of, but the rest remain outstanding. Yes, my experience at your FAC is quite different from any I have experienced. Not only the ugly comments, but I have never not had my comments addressed in the past. This is a whole new experience. An eye opener. I assumed too much about the quality of the article initially. Sorry! It has been disillusioning, as is you continued behavior now, as well as Cosmic Latte. &mdash; +++$+++ :Not really. I originally assumed the article was well referenced. It was only when I started to look closer that I was startled to find all the mistakes. I have crossed out all of the issues you have taken care of, but the rest remain outstanding. Yes, my experience at your FAC is quite different from any I have experienced. Not only the ugly comments, but I have never not had my comments addressed in the past. This is a whole new experience. An eye opener. I assumed too much about the quality of the article initially. Sorry! It has been disillusioning, as is you continued behavior now, as well as Cosmic Latte. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
268770 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268768 +++$+++ 268769 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.227440700E09 +++$+++ And you continue to dodge the question. Your behaviour which led to this. Tell me, is it appropriate to dictate to me how I spend time here as you did above? Cheers,  +++$+++ ::And you continue to dodge the question. Your behaviour which led to this. Tell me, is it appropriate to dictate to me how I spend time here as you did above? Cheers, [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 03:45, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268771 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268768 +++$+++ 268770 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.227441120E09 +++$+++ You know perfectly well that the FAC [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Major depressive disorder]] was disgusting. I have enough respect for you to believe that you know that perfectly well and are not proud of what happened there. I cannot accept that you condone the behavior of your comrade, Cosmic Latte. I don't think you are an idiot, at least I am leaving the question open.  Cheers, &mdash; +++$+++ :::You know perfectly well that the FAC [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Major depressive disorder]] was disgusting. I have enough respect for you to believe that you know that perfectly well and are not proud of what happened there. I cannot accept that you condone the behavior of your comrade, Cosmic Latte. I don't think you are an idiot, at least I am leaving the question open.  Cheers, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268772 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268768 +++$+++ 268771 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.227443640E09 +++$+++ And you know perfectly well that you were the first to bring acrimony into the whole process, yet you cling to this belief that it has all \"happened to you\". Can you not look at the diffs from the early part?? I am not commenting about Cosmic in this thread so please do not change the subject. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::And you know perfectly well that you were the first to bring acrimony into the whole process, yet you cling to this belief that it has all "happened to you". Can you not look at the diffs from the early part?? I am not commenting about Cosmic in this thread so please do not change the subject. Cheers, [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 04:34, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268773 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268768 +++$+++ 268772 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.227443880E09 +++$+++ I also continue to think that if someone nominates a FAC, they should have the decency to remain current with it, which you did not do. Since you seem distracted by articles and DYK's in the middle of (theoretically) your FAC, I have evolved the hypothesis that you have ADD.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I also continue to think that if someone nominates a FAC, they should have the decency to remain current with it, which you did not do. Since you seem distracted by articles and DYK's in the middle of (theoretically) your FAC, I have evolved the hypothesis that you have ADD.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268774 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268768 +++$+++ 268773 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.227454200E09 +++$+++ Remain current? Erm, a large chunk of my edits since it started have been related to the article since this started (plus chasing sources off-wiki and some frustrating stuffing around in a hospital library). I would be amused if anyone else shared your opinion that I had not \"remained current\", almost as much as the suggestion I have ADD. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::::Remain current? Erm, a large chunk of my edits since it started have been related to the article since this started (plus chasing sources off-wiki and some frustrating stuffing around in a hospital library). I would be amused if anyone else shared your opinion that I had not "remained current", almost as much as the suggestion I have ADD. Cheers, [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 07:30, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

530913 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530913 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-20 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.266670980E09 +++$+++ You got to ''talk'' to Eddie Hill?! 8o You don't need my help. ;D  Glad to have a look. In exchange, tho, will you watchlist [[Custom car|this]] & [[List of motorsports people by nickname|this]], & weigh in [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles#Chopped Merc|here]]? Thanx.   +++$+++ You got to ''talk'' to Eddie Hill?! 8o You don't need my help. ;D  Glad to have a look. In exchange, tho, will you watchlist [[Custom car|this]] & [[List of motorsports people by nickname|this]], & weigh in [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles#Chopped Merc|here]]? Thanx.  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>any time you're ready, Uhura</small> </sup>]]</font> 05:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
530914 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530913 +++$+++ 530913 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.266675000E09 +++$+++ Ah, I love having connections. ;p You can paste [[User:Trekphiler\/Hirohata Merc|here]]. (To repeat from the Auto project page, I wouldn't move it to mainspace with a copyvio tag outstanding; I mainly want to see if it's salvageable.) And see my comment [[Talk:Eddie Hill#On the Hill gang|here]] at your leisure.  +++$+++ :Ah, I love having connections. ;p You can paste [[User:Trekphiler/Hirohata Merc|here]]. (To repeat from the Auto project page, I wouldn't move it to mainspace with a copyvio tag outstanding; I mainly want to see if it's salvageable.) And see my comment [[Talk:Eddie Hill#On the Hill gang|here]] at your leisure. [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>any time you're ready, Uhura</small> </sup>]]</font> 06:02 & 06:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
530915 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530913 +++$+++ 530914 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.266675600E09 +++$+++ {{tick|18}} '''{{ucfirst:Done}}''' I hope you find it useful! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::{{tick|18}} '''{{ucfirst:Done}}''' I hope you find it useful! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 06:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
530916 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530913 +++$+++ 530915 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.266680580E09 +++$+++ {{tick|18}} '''{{ucfirst:Done}}''' & {{tick|18}} '''{{ucfirst:Done}}'''. It was! I do have some doubts about relying on websites as sources, & on a single one for most of it. I'm also a bit concerned about use of customizers' terms, & the general awkwardness of it. Still, it beats a redlink. Have a glance, see if you think it passes, & move into [[Hirohata Merc]]? Thanks again! Oh, one other thing: I've never been really clear if observation based on pictures & special knowledge\/experience qualifies as original research, so some of the comments on the page may be borderline; any suggestions are welcome.   +++$+++ :::{{tick|18}} '''{{ucfirst:Done}}''' & {{tick|18}} '''{{ucfirst:Done}}'''. It was! I do have some doubts about relying on websites as sources, & on a single one for most of it. I'm also a bit concerned about use of customizers' terms, & the general awkwardness of it. Still, it beats a redlink. Have a glance, see if you think it passes, & move into [[Hirohata Merc]]? Thanks again! Oh, one other thing: I've never been really clear if observation based on pictures & special knowledge/experience qualifies as original research, so some of the comments on the page may be borderline; any suggestions are welcome.  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>any time you're ready, Uhura</small> </sup>]]</font> 07:38 & 07:43, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
530917 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530913 +++$+++ 530916 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.266713940E09 +++$+++ To keep the specific minutia off the project page, I'm replying here. First, you're right about the notes; I'm terrible at it, so I'm going to let it go, & hope somebody who knows what they're doing can fix it. ;p I understand there are issues with retaining the page history, & when I posted that, I wasn't sure enough I could just move with no issues arising; if so, I'll handle it. The Google books is a good idea (it looks like good coverage, too); I can also fn the other mag apps, & the movie from ''CR'' (already sourced there); I'd've left off the movie ref, not knowing how important the Merc was to it (not likely equal \"[[The Car]]\" or Norm Grabowski's T-bucket, & ''Ala Kart'' made numerous apps in films & TV without attracting much attention at the time), plus the film's a redlink. I've also seen an article on the Merc, & I'm going thru my back issues to see if I can find it. (I really doubt that'll pan out anytime soon, tho. :\/ ) Thanx again.   +++$+++ ::::To keep the specific minutia off the project page, I'm replying here. First, you're right about the notes; I'm terrible at it, so I'm going to let it go, & hope somebody who knows what they're doing can fix it. ;p I understand there are issues with retaining the page history, & when I posted that, I wasn't sure enough I could just move with no issues arising; if so, I'll handle it. The Google books is a good idea (it looks like good coverage, too); I can also fn the other mag apps, & the movie from ''CR'' (already sourced there); I'd've left off the movie ref, not knowing how important the Merc was to it (not likely equal "[[The Car]]" or Norm Grabowski's T-bucket, & ''Ala Kart'' made numerous apps in films & TV without attracting much attention at the time), plus the film's a redlink. I've also seen an article on the Merc, & I'm going thru my back issues to see if I can find it. (I really doubt that'll pan out anytime soon, tho. :/ ) Thanx again.  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>any time you're ready, Uhura</small> </sup>]]</font> 16:17 & 16:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
530918 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530913 +++$+++ 530917 +++$+++ 2010-02-21 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.266759900E09 +++$+++ It's very important for you to do the citations! If you don't, it's impossible for someone else to do it - they don't have page numbers since they don't have the document in the their hand! By not doing it - you prevent it from becoming a [[WP:GA|Good Article]] except if they delete the content that you created or have to search hard to find another source. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::It's very important for you to do the citations! If you don't, it's impossible for someone else to do it - they don't have page numbers since they don't have the document in the their hand! By not doing it - you prevent it from becoming a [[WP:GA|Good Article]] except if they delete the content that you created or have to search hard to find another source. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
530919 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530913 +++$+++ 530918 +++$+++ 2010-02-21 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.266761580E09 +++$+++ Page numbers don't arise, in this instance; the bulk were website refs. Plus the p# were in the original cites. Never mind, tho, it came out OK. ;D (I've tried it before, see, & bungled it badly...) As for \"good article\", I'm happy for \"article\", myself; I'll leave serious improvement for people who know the ins & outs of it way better than me, & just keep them out of the pitfalls of really wrong info. As I think of it, tho, I used the Google books link you put up; should I have included it as the DeWitt source (which it was)? EZ to fix, if so.   +++$+++ ::::::Page numbers don't arise, in this instance; the bulk were website refs. Plus the p# were in the original cites. Never mind, tho, it came out OK. ;D (I've tried it before, see, & bungled it badly...) As for "good article", I'm happy for "article", myself; I'll leave serious improvement for people who know the ins & outs of it way better than me, & just keep them out of the pitfalls of really wrong info. As I think of it, tho, I used the Google books link you put up; should I have included it as the DeWitt source (which it was)? EZ to fix, if so.  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>any time you're ready, Uhura</small> </sup>]]</font> 06:08 & 06:13, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

6627 +++$+++ TDC +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6627 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-13 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.150243260E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Commodore Sloat]]  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Commodore Sloat]] [[User:TDC|Torturous Devastating Cudgel]] 17:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
6628 +++$+++ Evensong +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6627 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.150286040E09 +++$+++ It will take some time for me to peruse the complaint, but I did a \"once over\" on it.  It only scratches the tip of the iceberg.   +++$+++ ::It will take some time for me to peruse the complaint, but I did a "once over" on it.  It only scratches the tip of the iceberg.  [[User:Evensong|Evensong]] 04:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

268775 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268775 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-08 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.226190360E09 +++$+++ Must you use ALL CAPS in edit summaries?  +++$+++ Must you use ALL CAPS in edit summaries? [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 16:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
268776 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268775 +++$+++ 268775 +++$+++ 2008-11-08 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.226190960E09 +++$+++ OK, I will not use all caps. However, in the past my internal comments have been ignored and removed without any comment. This time I am actually getting a response for the first time!!!  &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, I will not use all caps. However, in the past my internal comments have been ignored and removed without any comment. This time I am actually getting a response for the first time!!!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
268777 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268775 +++$+++ 268776 +++$+++ 2008-11-08 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.226194260E09 +++$+++ Well, all right. Sorry for the duplicate message.  +++$+++ ::Well, all right. Sorry for the duplicate message. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 17:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
268778 +++$+++ Garrondo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268775 +++$+++ 268777 +++$+++ 2008-11-10 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.226354220E09 +++$+++ I preferred caps... they are easier to search for: anyway I think they are a good idea. I'll try to search for as many secondary sources as I can. Best regards.-- +++$+++ ::: I preferred caps... they are easier to search for: anyway I think they are a good idea. I'll try to search for as many secondary sources as I can. Best regards.--[[User:Garrondo|Garrondo]] ([[User talk:Garrondo|talk]]) 13:57, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

6632 +++$+++ CSTAR +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-20 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.150790520E09 +++$+++ Based on what seems to be WP policy, I have proposed deleting the RfC and will soon do so.  This doesn't mean your I think your complaints have no merit, although I think the stalking one doesn't have merit. As I mentioned, if you want private conversations with other users, use Email ( I regularly read email that comes from WP -- it's not much but I read it).  However, you would be better off trying an informal mediation process. If you like I would be willing to help. -- +++$+++ Based on what seems to be WP policy, I have proposed deleting the RfC and will soon do so.  This doesn't mean your I think your complaints have no merit, although I think the stalking one doesn't have merit. As I mentioned, if you want private conversations with other users, use Email ( I regularly read email that comes from WP -- it's not much but I read it).  However, you would be better off trying an informal mediation process. If you like I would be willing to help. --[[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 01:02, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
6633 +++$+++ CSTAR +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6632 +++$+++ 6632 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.150931880E09 +++$+++ I replied on my talk page. -- +++$+++ : I replied on my talk page. --[[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 16:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

6635 +++$+++ Anthonymendoza +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-28 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.151482740E09 +++$+++ i haven't had a chance to thoroughly review your proposed rewrite of [[Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda]], but i can tell that reaching any consensus on that page will be a difficult task.  i appreciate you taking notice to my additions.  i think the fox news translation is significant as well.  i'd enjoy the opportunity to collaborate with you on the article.  it seems lately all i do is debate and defend myself.  it would be a nice change of pace to work with someone.  i'm not sure where the article is headed, as i don't believe the entire story has been told yet, and i personally haven't reached any conclusions either way.  do you think you could provide links to articles you find most informative on the topic on my discussion page, or should i just read your rewrite?  as far as setting up an email, i'm not sure how to do that but it may not be necessary.  thanks.  +++$+++ i haven't had a chance to thoroughly review your proposed rewrite of [[Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda]], but i can tell that reaching any consensus on that page will be a difficult task.  i appreciate you taking notice to my additions.  i think the fox news translation is significant as well.  i'd enjoy the opportunity to collaborate with you on the article.  it seems lately all i do is debate and defend myself.  it would be a nice change of pace to work with someone.  i'm not sure where the article is headed, as i don't believe the entire story has been told yet, and i personally haven't reached any conclusions either way.  do you think you could provide links to articles you find most informative on the topic on my discussion page, or should i just read your rewrite?  as far as setting up an email, i'm not sure how to do that but it may not be necessary.  thanks. [[User:Anthonymendoza|Anthonymendoza]] 01:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
6636 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6635 +++$+++ 6635 +++$+++ 2006-06-28 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.151519160E09 +++$+++ As far as setting up an email, just click on the link to the left that says \"Email this user\" and wikipedia will walk you through the process of setting up an email.  Email is an excellent opportunity to move the discussion forward without being disrupted by others.  One of Sloat's tactics is to keep the football (meaning that he always has to reply to every statement one makes).  If you do not reply, then he claims you implicitly agreed with his POV.  Regarding the story not being told yet, I have to agree.  However, we can accurately tell what has happened so far.  My suggestion is you read through the rewrite the first time without looking at the sources just to check it for readability.  Then read it through again checking the sources to make certain I am not overstating the case at all.  I know it is a long process, but it is well worth it.  I am open to any suggestions you may have to make it better.  Once you have email set up, we can talk more.  +++$+++ :As far as setting up an email, just click on the link to the left that says "Email this user" and wikipedia will walk you through the process of setting up an email.  Email is an excellent opportunity to move the discussion forward without being disrupted by others.  One of Sloat's tactics is to keep the football (meaning that he always has to reply to every statement one makes).  If you do not reply, then he claims you implicitly agreed with his POV.  Regarding the story not being told yet, I have to agree.  However, we can accurately tell what has happened so far.  My suggestion is you read through the rewrite the first time without looking at the sources just to check it for readability.  Then read it through again checking the sources to make certain I am not overstating the case at all.  I know it is a long process, but it is well worth it.  I am open to any suggestions you may have to make it better.  Once you have email set up, we can talk more. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 11:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

263250 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-30 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.125427200E09 +++$+++ I'm trying to recategorise articles in this category into their relevant subcats (if you feel like helping ouit, I'll be more than happy...). If you still think that the presenters cat is inappropriate, Johnson will have to be removed from the hierarchy altogether.   +++$+++ I'm trying to recategorise articles in this category into their relevant subcats (if you feel like helping ouit, I'll be more than happy...). If you still think that the presenters cat is inappropriate, Johnson will have to be removed from the hierarchy altogether.  [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 11:40, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
263251 +++$+++ fvw +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263250 +++$+++ 263250 +++$+++ 2005-08-30 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.125427320E09 +++$+++ Good point, I've reverted myself. Thanks for spelling it out for me. -- +++$+++ :Good point, I've reverted myself. Thanks for spelling it out for me. --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 11:42, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
263252 +++$+++ fvw +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263250 +++$+++ 263251 +++$+++ 2005-08-30 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.125427440E09 +++$+++ On second thought, do we ''want'' to put all the guest presenters in the presenters cat? It does kind of dilute it with lots of people who aren't really presenters but just happen to have done something where they're really more of a guest but doing it in the formal style of a presenter. Still, I'll leave that up to you, you've obviously given this some thought. -- +++$+++ ::On second thought, do we ''want'' to put all the guest presenters in the presenters cat? It does kind of dilute it with lots of people who aren't really presenters but just happen to have done something where they're really more of a guest but doing it in the formal style of a presenter. Still, I'll leave that up to you, you've obviously given this some thought. --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 11:44, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
263253 +++$+++ Barrettmagic +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263250 +++$+++ 263251 +++$+++ 2005-09-03 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.125786480E09 +++$+++ Hey I saw you removed a couple pictures from the Bo Derek site - wanted to know why - its a short article but I like having a current picture in the bio when appropriate, something that brings the reader up to today. --  +++$+++ ::Hey I saw you removed a couple pictures from the Bo Derek site - wanted to know why - its a short article but I like having a current picture in the bio when appropriate, something that brings the reader up to today. -- [[User:Barrettmagic|Barrettmagic]] 15:28, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

6639 +++$+++ BhaiSaab +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-03 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.154657820E09 +++$+++ Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors.  See [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith]] for the guidelines on this.<!-- Template:agf1 -->  +++$+++ Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors.  See [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith]] for the guidelines on this.<!-- Template:agf1 --> [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] <sup>[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]</sup> 19:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
6640 +++$+++ BhaiSaab +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6639 +++$+++ 6639 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.154658540E09 +++$+++ Criticisms of Muhammad (pbuh) have existed since the beginning of Islam. It's nothing new or significant.  +++$+++ :Criticisms of Muhammad (pbuh) have existed since the beginning of Islam. It's nothing new or significant. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] <sup>[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]</sup> 19:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
6641 +++$+++ BhaiSaab +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6639 +++$+++ 6640 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.154659080E09 +++$+++ Whether criticisms are valid since the founding of Islam are not for us to judge. If you intend on adding that again, please provide a source that states that her criticism and condition are the most significant criticisms to Islam in its history.  +++$+++ ::Whether criticisms are valid since the founding of Islam are not for us to judge. If you intend on adding that again, please provide a source that states that her criticism and condition are the most significant criticisms to Islam in its history. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] <sup>[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]</sup> 19:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
6642 +++$+++ BhaiSaab +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6639 +++$+++ 6641 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.154659740E09 +++$+++ The content of the criticism, i.e., what it says about the Prophet Muhammad(pbuh), is significant, yes - but can you prove that the criticism made by this women is significant itself? Personally, I think criticisms made by the likes of [[ibn Warraq]] are more significant than that of Wafa Sultans.  +++$+++ :::The content of the criticism, i.e., what it says about the Prophet Muhammad(pbuh), is significant, yes - but can you prove that the criticism made by this women is significant itself? Personally, I think criticisms made by the likes of [[ibn Warraq]] are more significant than that of Wafa Sultans. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] <sup>[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]</sup> 19:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
6643 +++$+++ BhaiSaab +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6639 +++$+++ 6642 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.154660340E09 +++$+++ Please do not accuse me of being sexist. We can continue this on the [[Talk:Islam]] page.  +++$+++ ::::Please do not accuse me of being sexist. We can continue this on the [[Talk:Islam]] page. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] <sup>[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]</sup> 19:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

530930 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-27 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.267257960E09 +++$+++ |}   +++$+++ |}  [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 00:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
530931 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530930 +++$+++ 530930 +++$+++ 2010-02-27 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.267259220E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! +++$+++ :Congratulations![[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 00:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

530932 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-01 11:34:00 +++$+++ 1.267472040E09 +++$+++ I came across an article on [[Bio-Blend Fuels]] in Manitowoc the article was given the DYK. Maybe that can be added on-DYK articles from Wisconsin-thanks- +++$+++ I came across an article on [[Bio-Blend Fuels]] in Manitowoc the article was given the DYK. Maybe that can be added on-DYK articles from Wisconsin-thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 11:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
530933 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530932 +++$+++ 530932 +++$+++ 2010-03-01 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.267477800E09 +++$+++ All you have to do is add it to WikiProject Wisconsin and the bot should add it on the project page. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :All you have to do is add it to WikiProject Wisconsin and the bot should add it on the project page. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
530934 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530932 +++$+++ 530932 +++$+++ 2010-03-01 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.267479480E09 +++$+++ Took care of it. Thanks- +++$+++ :Took care of it. Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

6645 +++$+++ Zazaban +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-22 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.156235040E09 +++$+++ ugh...... I just read one of the comments youmade on me.  no I don't think you should be killed, but I do think you need therapy. violence was not taught by muhammed, but it was taught by wahabbi, some nutzo 18th century scholar who more or less founded terrorism. he was a loon yes, but don't mix his teachings up with muhammed's. he was chased and pursecuted by total barbarians, and his followers were in dire peril. what would YOU do if you were in a \"with you or against you\" situation? totally reasonable to ask people to defend themselves. do christians cut off their hands every time they masturbate?  +++$+++ ugh...... I just read one of the comments youmade on me.  no I don't think you should be killed, but I do think you need therapy. violence was not taught by muhammed, but it was taught by wahabbi, some nutzo 18th century scholar who more or less founded terrorism. he was a loon yes, but don't mix his teachings up with muhammed's. he was chased and pursecuted by total barbarians, and his followers were in dire peril. what would YOU do if you were in a "with you or against you" situation? totally reasonable to ask people to defend themselves. do christians cut off their hands every time they masturbate? [[User:Zazaban|Zazaban]] 01:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
6646 +++$+++ Shabeki +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6645 +++$+++ 6645 +++$+++ 2008-05-10 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.210427940E09 +++$+++ It's one thing to personally dislike a religion.  But to be so incredibly bigoted against it that a person must spout his or her warped views on an online encyclopedia and pass it off as fact shows that this guy must never, ever be allowed to become an admin.  Clearly, some people need to grow up and develop a modicum of maturity.  At least we know that this guy has zero chance of ever becoming an admin.  In which case, he's only wasting his time on here trying to spout his views to an audience that won't take. +++$+++ :It's one thing to personally dislike a religion.  But to be so incredibly bigoted against it that a person must spout his or her warped views on an online encyclopedia and pass it off as fact shows that this guy must never, ever be allowed to become an admin.  Clearly, some people need to grow up and develop a modicum of maturity.  At least we know that this guy has zero chance of ever becoming an admin.  In which case, he's only wasting his time on here trying to spout his views to an audience that won't take.[[User:Shabeki|Shabeki]] ([[User talk:Shabeki|talk]]) 06:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

6647 +++$+++ Blaxthos +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-11 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.163304540E09 +++$+++ Please don't try to pass off POV pushing websites as reliable sources.  Direct headline from cnsnews:  <tt>Iran, Syria Relieved That Democrats Won<\/tt>.  Come on, man... this is an encyclopedia.  \/ +++$+++ Please don't try to pass off POV pushing websites as reliable sources.  Direct headline from cnsnews:  <tt>Iran, Syria Relieved That Democrats Won</tt>.  Come on, man... this is an encyclopedia.  /[[User:Blaxthos|Blaxthos]] 20:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
6648 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6647 +++$+++ 6647 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.163365140E09 +++$+++ See my response on your user page. By the way, you should not be surprised that Iran, Syria and al-Qaeda were all relieved by the Democrats victory.  If you had been reading, you would know what they have been saying for a long time. [http:\/\/www.jpost.com\/servlet\/Satellite?c=JPArticle&cid=1162378354659&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull]  +++$+++ :See my response on your user page. By the way, you should not be surprised that Iran, Syria and al-Qaeda were all relieved by the Democrats victory.  If you had been reading, you would know what they have been saying for a long time. [http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?c=JPArticle&cid=1162378354659&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull] [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 12:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
6649 +++$+++ Blaxthos +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.163604420E09 +++$+++ Now, you're trying to insert an accusation of treason against a sitting U.S. Senator using a source that admittedly has a bias against the Senator.  Doesn't that seem a little egregious to you?  Hope this helps.  \/ +++$+++ :::Now, you're trying to insert an accusation of treason against a sitting U.S. Senator using a source that admittedly has a bias against the Senator.  Doesn't that seem a little egregious to you?  Hope this helps.  /[[User:Blaxthos|Blaxthos]] 07:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

530938 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-10 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.268251920E09 +++$+++ Good morning-there should not be any problems. Pickett and Waukau in Winnebago County are already done. There is a website Hometownlocator that comes in handy in addition to the Wisconsin Historical Society. It will be gradual in the next few weeks. Many thanks- +++$+++ Good morning-there should not be any problems. Pickett and Waukau in Winnebago County are already done. There is a website Hometownlocator that comes in handy in addition to the Wisconsin Historical Society. It will be gradual in the next few weeks. Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 12:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
530939 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530938 +++$+++ 530938 +++$+++ 2010-03-12 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.268448060E09 +++$+++ A quick note-you may want to see the talk page at Outagamie County article. I thought Wikipedia serves as a gazetteer. Thanks- +++$+++ :A quick note-you may want to see the talk page at Outagamie County article. I thought Wikipedia serves as a gazetteer. Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 18:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

6652 +++$+++ William M. Connolley +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-27 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.169953620E09 +++$+++ IMO you've broken 3RR re-inserting B+G into [[Attribution of recent climate change]] & I've reported you for it  +++$+++ IMO you've broken 3RR re-inserting B+G into [[Attribution of recent climate change]] & I've reported you for it [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 19:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
6653 +++$+++ Ed Poor +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6652 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.171411680E09 +++$+++ According to the report, most of the money went to groups that favor \"restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions and believe that climate change requires dramatic government action.\"The top recipient was Strategies for the Global Environment, which is the umbrella organization for the [[Pew Center on Global Climate Change]], an Arlington, Va.-based advocacy group. The foundations also heavily favored the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Environmental Defense. [http:\/\/www.marshall.org\/article.php?id=284] -- +++$+++ :*According to the report, most of the money went to groups that favor "restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions and believe that climate change requires dramatic government action."The top recipient was Strategies for the Global Environment, which is the umbrella organization for the [[Pew Center on Global Climate Change]], an Arlington, Va.-based advocacy group. The foundations also heavily favored the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Environmental Defense. [http://www.marshall.org/article.php?id=284] --[[User:Ed Poor|Uncle Ed]] 16:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

6654 +++$+++ Mishlai +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6654 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.171626480E09 +++$+++ You seem sincere RonCram.  I would suggest that you check out http:\/\/www.realclimate.org  They're certainly not afraid to say when someone is overstating the case for global warming, as their series on hurricanes illustrates.  Thanks for joining the discussion.   +++$+++ You seem sincere RonCram.  I would suggest that you check out http://www.realclimate.org  They're certainly not afraid to say when someone is overstating the case for global warming, as their series on hurricanes illustrates.  Thanks for joining the discussion.  [[User:Mishlai|Mishlai]] 03:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
6655 +++$+++ Mishlai +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6654 +++$+++ 6654 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.171975980E09 +++$+++ I'm looking for and cannot find a link to the Wegman report that isn't broken.  Have one?  Thanks for your help.  +++$+++ :I'm looking for and cannot find a link to the Wegman report that isn't broken.  Have one?  Thanks for your help. [[User:Mishlai|Mishlai]] 04:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
6656 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6654 +++$+++ 6655 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.172013300E09 +++$+++ Hi Mishlai, there are working links at  [[Temperature record of the past 1000 years]] and [[Hockey stick controversy]]. Look for the ones labeled \"Ad hoc committee report on the \u2018Hockey Stick\u2019 Global Climate Reconstruction\". The actual copy is hosted by the [[Heartland Institute]], but seems to be ok. -- +++$+++ ::Hi Mishlai, there are working links at  [[Temperature record of the past 1000 years]] and [[Hockey stick controversy]]. Look for the ones labeled "Ad hoc committee report on the ‘Hockey Stick’ Global Climate Reconstruction". The actual copy is hosted by the [[Heartland Institute]], but seems to be ok. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 15:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

268799 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-17 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.226909640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help on [[Lockdown (2008)]]. I did not notice the overlinking problems and I had no idea what to link to instead of disambiguity pages.-- +++$+++ Thanks for the help on [[Lockdown (2008)]]. I did not notice the overlinking problems and I had no idea what to link to instead of disambiguity pages.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 00:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268800 +++$+++ SRX +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.226910060E09 +++$+++ I see you did a copyedit(?) to the above article, is it possible to do the same for [[Over the Edge (1999)]].--'''''[[User:SRX|<font color=\"blue\">S<\/font><\/font>]]<sub>[[User talk:SRX|<font color=\"black\">R<\/font>]]<\/sub> +++$+++ :I see you did a copyedit(?) to the above article, is it possible to do the same for [[Over the Edge (1999)]].--'''''[[User:SRX|<font color="blue">S</font></font>]]<sub>[[User talk:SRX|<font color="black">R</font>]]</sub>[[User:SRX/Guestbook|<font color="blue">X</font></font>]]''''' 00:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268801 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268800 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.226911980E09 +++$+++ SRX, maybe later. Your article already looks very good! And it is about an interesting event. What are your goals for the article? &mdash; +++$+++ ::SRX, maybe later. Your article already looks very good! And it is about an interesting event. What are your goals for the article? &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:53, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268802 +++$+++ SRX +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268801 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.226912160E09 +++$+++ My goal is for it to be promoted as an FA. It is currently under [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Over the Edge (1999)\/archive2|peer review]].--'''''[[User:SRX|<font color=\"blue\">S<\/font><\/font>]]<sub>[[User talk:SRX|<font color=\"black\">R<\/font>]]<\/sub> +++$+++ :::My goal is for it to be promoted as an FA. It is currently under [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Over the Edge (1999)/archive2|peer review]].--'''''[[User:SRX|<font color="blue">S</font></font>]]<sub>[[User talk:SRX|<font color="black">R</font>]]</sub>[[User:SRX/Guestbook|<font color="blue">X</font></font>]]''''' 00:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268803 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268802 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.226912640E09 +++$+++ It looks good and I will run through the article. Since [[Lockdown (2008)]] has just entered FAC, I am not sure how the FAC people will regard another wrestling article so soon. Watch what happens there so you can see what their reaction is. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::It looks good and I will run through the article. Since [[Lockdown (2008)]] has just entered FAC, I am not sure how the FAC people will regard another wrestling article so soon. Watch what happens there so you can see what their reaction is. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268804 +++$+++ SRX +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268803 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.226912880E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I will wait for that one to either be archived or wait for until it is in the bottom 5. About a month ago, there were 3 FAC's at the same time, which fed up the reviewers, only one passed. But I have experience with FAC, I contributed to helping pass [[SummerSlam (2003)]] and [[No Way Out (2004)]] to FA. OTE is unique from others due to the nature surrounding it, hopefully that can be seen at FAC.--'''''[[User:SRX|<font color=\"blue\">S<\/font><\/font>]]<sub>[[User talk:SRX|<font color=\"black\">R<\/font>]]<\/sub> +++$+++ :::::Yeah, I will wait for that one to either be archived or wait for until it is in the bottom 5. About a month ago, there were 3 FAC's at the same time, which fed up the reviewers, only one passed. But I have experience with FAC, I contributed to helping pass [[SummerSlam (2003)]] and [[No Way Out (2004)]] to FA. OTE is unique from others due to the nature surrounding it, hopefully that can be seen at FAC.--'''''[[User:SRX|<font color="blue">S</font></font>]]<sub>[[User talk:SRX|<font color="black">R</font>]]</sub>[[User:SRX/Guestbook|<font color="blue">X</font></font>]]''''' 01:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268805 +++$+++ SRX +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 2008-11-20 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.227173280E09 +++$+++ I'm guessing you didn't have time? =-)--''''' +++$+++ :I'm guessing you didn't have time? =-)--'''''[[User:SRX|<font color="blue">TRU</font></font>]]<sub>[[User talk:SRX|<font color="black">CO</font>]]</sub>''''' 01:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
268806 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268805 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.226910360E09 +++$+++ Okay, I haven't really read the full MOS page, I have a short attention span and can't sit still for as long as it will take to read that entire thing. Thanks for the help. Also I'm not sure Sacrifice (2008) should be italicised. I believe there is a rule against that. I don't have the link for it, but I believe pay-per-view events such as Sacrifice do not fall under the category to have italics.-- +++$+++ ::Okay, I haven't really read the full MOS page, I have a short attention span and can't sit still for as long as it will take to read that entire thing. Thanks for the help. Also I'm not sure Sacrifice (2008) should be italicised. I believe there is a rule against that. I don't have the link for it, but I believe pay-per-view events such as Sacrifice do not fall under the category to have italics.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 00:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268807 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268806 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.226910600E09 +++$+++ I removed the italics, as I saw it was not in italics at other places. The link I sent you basically says wikilink as little as possible. Only wikilink once to any given word. Do not wikilink common words that an English speaking person would know, not even countries that most people know.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I removed the italics, as I saw it was not in italics at other places. The link I sent you basically says wikilink as little as possible. Only wikilink once to any given word. Do not wikilink common words that an English speaking person would know, not even countries that most people know.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268808 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268807 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.226910840E09 +++$+++ Yeah, the professional wrestling has had a problem with overlinking. I myself don't know when I've overlinked or not. I tend to try to figure out what would be quick reference and what isn't so I know. I linked Sacrifice twice in the aftermath because I believed the template fell under quick reference. I still have a long way to go before I know exactly what I'm doing on here. Almost been a year and I'm still learning, wikipedia is funny like that.-- +++$+++ ::::Yeah, the professional wrestling has had a problem with overlinking. I myself don't know when I've overlinked or not. I tend to try to figure out what would be quick reference and what isn't so I know. I linked Sacrifice twice in the aftermath because I believed the template fell under quick reference. I still have a long way to go before I know exactly what I'm doing on here. Almost been a year and I'm still learning, wikipedia is funny like that.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 00:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268809 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.226910900E09 +++$+++ Also, I have your talk page on my watchlist. If you want to reply here, I'll know. Every page I edit becomes automatically watched.-- +++$+++ :Also, I have your talk page on my watchlist. If you want to reply here, I'll know. Every page I edit becomes automatically watched.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 00:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268810 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268809 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.226911380E09 +++$+++ Okay. FAC is very difficult. I will try and help you out, but I don't know anything about wrestling, although I havecopy edited a few wrestling articles for GA. Also, I'm not sure how the FAC people will regard a wrestling article, if they  think wrestling is  a good enough topic for FA. I don't want to discourage you, but just prepare yourself. Is there a wrestling editor that can help you out with the  FAC?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Okay. FAC is very difficult. I will try and help you out, but I don't know anything about wrestling, although I havecopy edited a few wrestling articles for GA. Also, I'm not sure how the FAC people will regard a wrestling article, if they  think wrestling is  a good enough topic for FA. I don't want to discourage you, but just prepare yourself. Is there a wrestling editor that can help you out with the  FAC?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268811 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268810 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.226912760E09 +++$+++ Don't worry dude, I don't really need any help. I'm mainly the only one who works on [[Total Nonstop Action Wrestling]] articles. I've worked on all 12 of their 2008 ppvs alone. I tend to work alone. Most of the time people want me to follow their example. I don't like that. I would rather follow the criteria and learn on my own. Me and a few editors from the project have disagreements on how many matches should be in the background. I think all that got enough attention that a good paragraph can be made while they disagree. Though some feed back on the prose would be nice. That has worried me. Been working on Lockdown since May of this year. It is all starting to sound the same.-- +++$+++ :::Don't worry dude, I don't really need any help. I'm mainly the only one who works on [[Total Nonstop Action Wrestling]] articles. I've worked on all 12 of their 2008 ppvs alone. I tend to work alone. Most of the time people want me to follow their example. I don't like that. I would rather follow the criteria and learn on my own. Me and a few editors from the project have disagreements on how many matches should be in the background. I think all that got enough attention that a good paragraph can be made while they disagree. Though some feed back on the prose would be nice. That has worried me. Been working on Lockdown since May of this year. It is all starting to sound the same.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 01:06, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268812 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268811 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.226913120E09 +++$+++ I can go through it for prose issues. The FAC people will also point things out. I noticed one of them pointed out [[WP:ACCESS]] issues in an edit summary. Unfortunately, I could not tell what she meant, even after reading the WP:ACCESS page!  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I can go through it for prose issues. The FAC people will also point things out. I noticed one of them pointed out [[WP:ACCESS]] issues in an edit summary. Unfortunately, I could not tell what she meant, even after reading the WP:ACCESS page!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:12, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268813 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268812 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.226913300E09 +++$+++ I noticed that [[User:GaryColemanFan|GaryColemanFan]] helped you out. He is very good on wrestling.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I noticed that [[User:GaryColemanFan|GaryColemanFan]] helped you out. He is very good on wrestling.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268814 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.226913840E09 +++$+++ Yeah, he helped me with the GA review when the article was much larger. I don't have a problem with him, he agrees with me on the background problems. I've never heard of [[WP:ACCESS]]. I saw it and went, another article I'm going to have to read. I don't have much time in real life. That is why there are so many MOS problems. I really need to learn to sit still and read that page.-- +++$+++ :Yeah, he helped me with the GA review when the article was much larger. I don't have a problem with him, he agrees with me on the background problems. I've never heard of [[WP:ACCESS]]. I saw it and went, another article I'm going to have to read. I don't have much time in real life. That is why there are so many MOS problems. I really need to learn to sit still and read that page.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 01:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268815 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268814 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.226914200E09 +++$+++ Well, I looked at the article, but I could not tell what was wrong with your article by the description given there. Basically, it is saying that article elements have to be in a certain order so that screen readers can read them.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Well, I looked at the article, but I could not tell what was wrong with your article by the description given there. Basically, it is saying that article elements have to be in a certain order so that screen readers can read them.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
268816 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268799 +++$+++ 268815 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.226914500E09 +++$+++ Okay. It doesn't matter much to me what is changed, as long as I get it to FA. I've worked on the thing long enough and went to hell and back to get it to sound right. FA is the reward for all the hard work from May. I still have 11 more to go.-- +++$+++ :::Okay. It doesn't matter much to me what is changed, as long as I get it to FA. I've worked on the thing long enough and went to hell and back to get it to sound right. FA is the reward for all the hard work from May. I still have 11 more to go.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 01:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

6657 +++$+++ Mnyakko +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-17 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.171719540E09 +++$+++ For the time being I will need your help documenting the bias issues.  Or researching patterns by those users on other pages.  Some of the other people I have been in contact with suggested we stop editing the page until all of our options are explored. --   +++$+++ For the time being I will need your help documenting the bias issues.  Or researching patterns by those users on other pages.  Some of the other people I have been in contact with suggested we stop editing the page until all of our options are explored. --  [[User:Mnyakko/aboutme|Tony of Race to the Right]] 05:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
6658 +++$+++ Mnyakko +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6657 +++$+++ 6657 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.172012640E09 +++$+++ OR  Please feel free to add examples of bias you have encountered by the pro-Global Warming crowd at [blacklsited site deleted]...I am accumulating all of the evidence for various actions throughout Wikipedia for the pages, users, etc and your help with the footwork is appreciated. --   +++$+++ :OR  Please feel free to add examples of bias you have encountered by the pro-Global Warming crowd at [blacklsited site deleted]...I am accumulating all of the evidence for various actions throughout Wikipedia for the pages, users, etc and your help with the footwork is appreciated. --  [[User:Mnyakko/aboutme|Tony of Race to the Right]] 15:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

530947 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-15 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.268682540E09 +++$+++ I added a section about the Lutze Housebarn to the town of Newton article in Manitowoc County, Wisconsin. I do not know if you have any photos? Many thanks- +++$+++ I added a section about the Lutze Housebarn to the town of Newton article in Manitowoc County, Wisconsin. I do not know if you have any photos? Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 12:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
530948 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530947 +++$+++ 530947 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.268723400E09 +++$+++ The [[housebarn]] article is scheduled to appear on the main page on Tuesday at 1:00pm our time, so check it out! It will be my 97th DYK and #98 ([[Dale Armstrong]]) is in the suggestions area. I'm done with most of the work on the 3 articles that I'm making for my 100th - it will be a triple hook. Thanks to BaronLarf's suggestion, [[Norm Nelson]] from Racine will be part of the trio. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :The [[housebarn]] article is scheduled to appear on the main page on Tuesday at 1:00pm our time, so check it out! It will be my 97th DYK and #98 ([[Dale Armstrong]]) is in the suggestions area. I'm done with most of the work on the 3 articles that I'm making for my 100th - it will be a triple hook. Thanks to BaronLarf's suggestion, [[Norm Nelson]] from Racine will be part of the trio. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

530949 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-16 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.268787840E09 +++$+++ |}   +++$+++ |}  [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 18:04, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
530950 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530949 +++$+++ 530949 +++$+++ 2010-03-17 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.268855400E09 +++$+++ Congratulations-very interesting- +++$+++ :Congratulations-very interesting-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 12:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

569089 +++$+++ Jcbutler +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569089 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-04 08:48:00 +++$+++ 1.162658880E09 +++$+++ Hi, I tried to fix the vandalism on the chess template, but I don't think I was successful. I'm still a bit new at this... +++$+++ Hi, I tried to fix the vandalism on the chess template, but I don't think I was successful. I'm still a bit new at this...[[User:Jcbutler|Jcbutler]] 08:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
569090 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569089 +++$+++ 569089 +++$+++ 2006-11-06 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.162849260E09 +++$+++ Hello! The best thing that you can do if you want to understand and counter vandalism is read [[Wikipedia:Vandalism]].  This should give you enough background information - please ask if you need any more assistance. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello! The best thing that you can do if you want to understand and counter vandalism is read [[Wikipedia:Vandalism]].  This should give you enough background information - please ask if you need any more assistance. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 13:41, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

6664 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6664 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.172026800E09 +++$+++ Ron, my Ph.D. is in computer science (from [[Technical University of Munich]]). German universities award either a Dr.rer.nat. or a Dr.ing. for computer science. The ''rerum naturalis'' is used much like the Philosophy in Ph.D., only restricted to the hard sciences. My M.Sci. (actually, \"Diplom\") is in Computer Science with a minor in Physics. I'm not particularly interested in climate, I'm interested in having the science fairly presented on Wikipedia (and elsewhere). I've also edited [[Creationism]] and similar contentious articles out of the same motivation. -- +++$+++ Ron, my Ph.D. is in computer science (from [[Technical University of Munich]]). German universities award either a Dr.rer.nat. or a Dr.ing. for computer science. The ''rerum naturalis'' is used much like the Philosophy in Ph.D., only restricted to the hard sciences. My M.Sci. (actually, "Diplom") is in Computer Science with a minor in Physics. I'm not particularly interested in climate, I'm interested in having the science fairly presented on Wikipedia (and elsewhere). I've also edited [[Creationism]] and similar contentious articles out of the same motivation. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 19:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
6665 +++$+++ Brittainia +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6664 +++$+++ 6664 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.172631660E09 +++$+++ Good luck & many thanks. --  +++$+++ :Good luck & many thanks. -- [[User:Brittainia|Brittainia]] 19:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

530953 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530953 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-20 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.269153600E09 +++$+++ Since it appears that you are good at uploading photos from Flickr I would like to ask you if you would upload this [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/30827866@N04\/4438214531\/] to Wikipedia because there is no known photo with the spoiler on Sprint Cup Series Car of Tomorrow. --''' +++$+++ Since it appears that you are good at uploading photos from Flickr I would like to ask you if you would upload this [http://www.flickr.com/photos/30827866@N04/4438214531/] to Wikipedia because there is no known photo with the spoiler on Sprint Cup Series Car of Tomorrow. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 23:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
530954 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530953 +++$+++ 530953 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.269154920E09 +++$+++ That image is copyrighted and cannot be uploaded. Check out the lower right corner - it says \"All Rights Reserved\". We would have to find an image with Creative Commons before we can upload. The only Creative Commons criteria allowed are only Attribution and ShareAlike - so images with Non Commericial or No Derivatives are not allowed either. You can find out which criteria are used on a Creative Commons image by clicking on the Creative Commons license wording and another window opens telling you which of these 4 criteria are being used. [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mmzz\/4133890616\/ Here's] an image that I just approved for Commons that has only the Attribution criteria and [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/royal_broil\/ my images] all use Attribution and ShareAlike. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :That image is copyrighted and cannot be uploaded. Check out the lower right corner - it says "All Rights Reserved". We would have to find an image with Creative Commons before we can upload. The only Creative Commons criteria allowed are only Attribution and ShareAlike - so images with Non Commericial or No Derivatives are not allowed either. You can find out which criteria are used on a Creative Commons image by clicking on the Creative Commons license wording and another window opens telling you which of these 4 criteria are being used. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmzz/4133890616/ Here's] an image that I just approved for Commons that has only the Attribution criteria and [http://www.flickr.com/photos/royal_broil/ my images] all use Attribution and ShareAlike. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
530955 +++$+++ The359 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530953 +++$+++ 530954 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.269157260E09 +++$+++ I was only at Daytona for the Rolex 24, nothing NASCAR related, so no photos.  +++$+++ ::I was only at Daytona for the Rolex 24, nothing NASCAR related, so no photos. [[User:The359|<font color="#004400">The<sup>3</sup>5<sub>9</sub></font>]] ([[User talk:The359|<font color="#004400"><b>Talk</b></font>]]) 00:41, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
530956 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530953 +++$+++ 530955 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.269164400E09 +++$+++ So on the [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mmzz\/4133890616\/ Image] that you showed me the right have to be some rights reserved? --''' +++$+++ :::So on the [http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmzz/4133890616/ Image] that you showed me the right have to be some rights reserved? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 02:40, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
530957 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530953 +++$+++ 530956 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.269166860E09 +++$+++ I have a [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Bad_day_at_the_office.jpg photo] that I would like you to see if everything is appropriate.If not please recommend deletion of the image (unless it is able to be fixed). Thank You. --''' +++$+++ ::::I have a [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bad_day_at_the_office.jpg photo] that I would like you to see if everything is appropriate.If not please recommend deletion of the image (unless it is able to be fixed). Thank You. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 03:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
530958 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530953 +++$+++ 530957 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.269167040E09 +++$+++ This [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/bristolmotorspeedway\/2821995457\/ image] is a awesome photo of Bristol Motor Speedway and I would like you to review it to see if it can be uploaded to Wikipedia. Thank You. --''' +++$+++ :::::This [http://www.flickr.com/photos/bristolmotorspeedway/2821995457/ image] is a awesome photo of Bristol Motor Speedway and I would like you to review it to see if it can be uploaded to Wikipedia. Thank You. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 03:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
530959 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530953 +++$+++ 530958 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.269167760E09 +++$+++ Great questions! I'm excited that you're asking me! The first photo is not suitable for Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia because it used No Derivatives and Non-Commercial - so I'll have to delete it. I don't make the rules. I'm surprised that a bot didn't review - find problems - and get it deleted. On that second image, it can't be uploaded for 2 reasons. First it's Non-Commercial so it can't be uploaded. Second, the photo has a watermark that says that CIAStockPhoto.com took the picture, which means it's a copyright violation. That might not be entirely true since Bristol Motor Speedway might have rights to it. This is a rare instance. When there's a website watermark in the corner, 99% of the time it's some person who uploaded a photo that they stole from some website and uploaded to flickr. Then it couldn't be used. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::Great questions! I'm excited that you're asking me! The first photo is not suitable for Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia because it used No Derivatives and Non-Commercial - so I'll have to delete it. I don't make the rules. I'm surprised that a bot didn't review - find problems - and get it deleted. On that second image, it can't be uploaded for 2 reasons. First it's Non-Commercial so it can't be uploaded. Second, the photo has a watermark that says that CIAStockPhoto.com took the picture, which means it's a copyright violation. That might not be entirely true since Bristol Motor Speedway might have rights to it. This is a rare instance. When there's a website watermark in the corner, 99% of the time it's some person who uploaded a photo that they stole from some website and uploaded to flickr. Then it couldn't be used. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:36, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

6670 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-04 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.173000360E09 +++$+++ [...] We think that a more interesting issue is whether the late 20th century was warmer than periods of similar length in the 11th century. ''We ourselves do not opine on this matter'', other than to say that the MBH results relied upon so heavily by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in its 2001 report are invalid.\" And a bit further up, they clearly answer the question \"Are you saying the 15th century was warmer than the present?\" with a resounding \"No [...]\".-- +++$+++ [...] We think that a more interesting issue is whether the late 20th century was warmer than periods of similar length in the 11th century. ''We ourselves do not opine on this matter'', other than to say that the MBH results relied upon so heavily by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in its 2001 report are invalid." And a bit further up, they clearly answer the question "Are you saying the 15th century was warmer than the present?" with a resounding "No [...]".--[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 01:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
6671 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6670 +++$+++ 6670 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.173053640E09 +++$+++ Hi Stephan.  William and I have been around and around on this.  I think we finally see eye to eye.  William is correct when he says M&M have never done their own reconstructions.  They do not express their opinion on the matter because they have not done their own reconstructions \"from scratch.\"  For them to do their own reconstructions, they would have to be confident that all of the proxies used were reliable. What M&M have done is a little different.  They searched the literature and found that the proxies used by Mann and Jones were considered unreliable by experts in the field.  Mann used the bristlecone pine series and Jones (if I remember correctly) used the Polar Urals series.  The NAS and Wegman agreed with M&M regarding the bristlecone pine series.  I don't think any third party has evaluated the McIntyre vs Jones controversy, but I'm certain any independent assessment would side with McI.  What McI and McK did in both cases was remove the errors and rerun the reconstruction.  What this effort does is provide readers who trust the remaining Mann and Jones proxies with accurate results. (If a particular reader trusted the Mann and Jones proxies prior to correction, then they should certainly accept the version after the errors have been removed.)  McK published the corrected Mann version.  McI published the corrected Jones reconstruction.  In both cases the corrected reconstruction shows the 20th century was not outside natural climate variability. I hope this clears up the issue for you.  +++$+++ :Hi Stephan.  William and I have been around and around on this.  I think we finally see eye to eye.  William is correct when he says M&M have never done their own reconstructions.  They do not express their opinion on the matter because they have not done their own reconstructions "from scratch."  For them to do their own reconstructions, they would have to be confident that all of the proxies used were reliable. What M&M have done is a little different.  They searched the literature and found that the proxies used by Mann and Jones were considered unreliable by experts in the field.  Mann used the bristlecone pine series and Jones (if I remember correctly) used the Polar Urals series.  The NAS and Wegman agreed with M&M regarding the bristlecone pine series.  I don't think any third party has evaluated the McIntyre vs Jones controversy, but I'm certain any independent assessment would side with McI.  What McI and McK did in both cases was remove the errors and rerun the reconstruction.  What this effort does is provide readers who trust the remaining Mann and Jones proxies with accurate results. (If a particular reader trusted the Mann and Jones proxies prior to correction, then they should certainly accept the version after the errors have been removed.)  McK published the corrected Mann version.  McI published the corrected Jones reconstruction.  In both cases the corrected reconstruction shows the 20th century was not outside natural climate variability. I hope this clears up the issue for you. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 16:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
6672 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6670 +++$+++ 6671 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.173065820E09 +++$+++ Hi Ron. Mann et al actually used multi-proxy reconstruction, not single-proxy reconstruction. And your claim (and, to be fair, M&M's claim) is of course only correct if you a) accept their claim about the systematic error and b) accept their correction as correct. As far as I know, they have not found any support in the scientific literature. You might want to look at this RealClimate [http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2006\/07\/the-missing-piece-at-the-wegman-hearing\/ article] (and, since you probably don't trust RealClimate, the original sources they cite). Also, since you like to have data and code, [http:\/\/www.cgd.ucar.edu\/ccr\/ammann\/millennium\/CODES_MBH.html this page] has all that for the Wahl and Amman paper, and finds all the \"corrected\" M&M versions to be statistically insignificant.-- +++$+++ ::Hi Ron. Mann et al actually used multi-proxy reconstruction, not single-proxy reconstruction. And your claim (and, to be fair, M&M's claim) is of course only correct if you a) accept their claim about the systematic error and b) accept their correction as correct. As far as I know, they have not found any support in the scientific literature. You might want to look at this RealClimate [http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/07/the-missing-piece-at-the-wegman-hearing/ article] (and, since you probably don't trust RealClimate, the original sources they cite). Also, since you like to have data and code, [http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/ammann/millennium/CODES_MBH.html this page] has all that for the Wahl and Amman paper, and finds all the "corrected" M&M versions to be statistically insignificant.--[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 19:37, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
6673 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6670 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-16 09:01:00 +++$+++ 1.179331260E09 +++$+++ You might be interested in this [http:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/climatefeedback\/2007\/05\/the_decay_of_the_hockey_stick.html#comment-86863 post] by Zorita und von Storch. They are obviously far from \"conceding the point\". And please, before you quote-mine this to death, read the last sentences.-- +++$+++ :::::You might be interested in this [http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/2007/05/the_decay_of_the_hockey_stick.html#comment-86863 post] by Zorita und von Storch. They are obviously far from "conceding the point". And please, before you quote-mine this to death, read the last sentences.--[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 09:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
6674 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6670 +++$+++ 6672 +++$+++ 2007-03-07 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.173327660E09 +++$+++ Regarding the lengthy Wahl & Ammann piece you cited, although M&M were quite dismissive of an earlier attempt by W&A, it appears they have not commented on this particular version.  I will not attempt to comment at this point, except to note that the criticisms of Burger and Cubasch would apparently hold regarding this effort by W&A as well.   I hope this clears up any misunderstanding you have that M&M \u201chave not found any support in the scientific literature.\u201d  +++$+++ :::Regarding the lengthy Wahl & Ammann piece you cited, although M&M were quite dismissive of an earlier attempt by W&A, it appears they have not commented on this particular version.  I will not attempt to comment at this point, except to note that the criticisms of Burger and Cubasch would apparently hold regarding this effort by W&A as well.   I hope this clears up any misunderstanding you have that M&M “have not found any support in the scientific literature.” [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 20:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
6675 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6670 +++$+++ 6672 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.173440280E09 +++$+++ Stephan, I just found the ClimateAudit category \"Wahl and Ammann.\" [http:\/\/www.climateaudit.org\/?cat=20]  So I guess McIntyre has responded and I did not realize it. Enjoy the reading!  +++$+++ :::Stephan, I just found the ClimateAudit category "Wahl and Ammann." [http://www.climateaudit.org/?cat=20]  So I guess McIntyre has responded and I did not realize it. Enjoy the reading! [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 03:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
6676 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6670 +++$+++ 6675 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.174807620E09 +++$+++ Honestly, I have better things to do then read through M&Ms confused, patronizing bile. I've tried a few times, but got nothing useful from it. If they get something published in a real journal, I'll happily read it.-- +++$+++ ::::Honestly, I have better things to do then read through M&Ms confused, patronizing bile. I've tried a few times, but got nothing useful from it. If they get something published in a real journal, I'll happily read it.--[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 00:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
6677 +++$+++ Rameses +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6670 +++$+++ 6670 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.173021780E09 +++$+++ I have read that the reason the IPCC does not show the historical charts of temperature and CO2 levels in the usual overlapping fashion - to show correlation - is that they show that temperatures rise historically '''before''' CO2 levels.  Also, I understand that the climate models all ignore the main greenhouse gas, H2O vapour, and it's various effects (cloud formation etc.) because it is too complex to model currently.  This would seem to render the models almost useless as it is like predicting tomorrow's weather while ignoring the clouds.  Could you comment on these reports?  BTW - good work on your \"Global warming controversy\" page so far, I will be happy to join in and contribute what I can.  ~  +++$+++ :I have read that the reason the IPCC does not show the historical charts of temperature and CO2 levels in the usual overlapping fashion - to show correlation - is that they show that temperatures rise historically '''before''' CO2 levels.  Also, I understand that the climate models all ignore the main greenhouse gas, H2O vapour, and it's various effects (cloud formation etc.) because it is too complex to model currently.  This would seem to render the models almost useless as it is like predicting tomorrow's weather while ignoring the clouds.  Could you comment on these reports?  BTW - good work on your "Global warming controversy" page so far, I will be happy to join in and contribute what I can.  ~ [[User:Rameses|Rameses]] 07:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
6678 +++$+++ Birdbrainscan +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6670 +++$+++ 6677 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.173048480E09 +++$+++ But right here I want to focus on this one issue: is there any reasonable way to claim that we don't know humans are behind the recent rise in CO2 levels? I think it is a lot easier to argue whether CO2 is causing warming (a more complex topic, for sure) but I just don't see how anyone can realistically argue that CO2 going from 280 to 380 ppm in 150 years is a natural fluctuation, not \"our fault,\" given the amount of fossil fuel we know we've extracted, sold and burned. Thanks for your kind words; I'm just a newcomer to this so I've only put in a small contribution on a few pages, but I really enjoy this collaborative process. +++$+++ ::But right here I want to focus on this one issue: is there any reasonable way to claim that we don't know humans are behind the recent rise in CO2 levels? I think it is a lot easier to argue whether CO2 is causing warming (a more complex topic, for sure) but I just don't see how anyone can realistically argue that CO2 going from 280 to 380 ppm in 150 years is a natural fluctuation, not "our fault," given the amount of fossil fuel we know we've extracted, sold and burned. Thanks for your kind words; I'm just a newcomer to this so I've only put in a small contribution on a few pages, but I really enjoy this collaborative process.[[User:Birdbrainscan|Birdbrainscan]] 14:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

481709 +++$+++ Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481709 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-22 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.140613260E09 +++$+++ I was watching HBO and saw an episode on [[Carl Tanzler]] on ''Autopsy''. I started the research and even was bold enough to contact the family, some helped, but another member went in and deleted references to their side of the family. I used all my powers of research. I went into the census and the Florida death index, and searched through historical papers. -- +++$+++ I was watching HBO and saw an episode on [[Carl Tanzler]] on ''Autopsy''. I started the research and even was bold enough to contact the family, some helped, but another member went in and deleted references to their side of the family. I used all my powers of research. I went into the census and the Florida death index, and searched through historical papers. --[[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] 05:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
481710 +++$+++ Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481709 +++$+++ 481709 +++$+++ 2006-02-22 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.140614940E09 +++$+++ In the timeline you can click on the obituaries I found, and where I found him in the census. I also debunked the three madeup stories about him by reading the obituaries and the original newspaper accounts. I have a subscription to ancestry.com and the New York Times archive, so I can access papers from 1841 to the present. I found three movie stars that lied about their birth dates, and Encyclopedia Britannica has the wrong dates. -- +++$+++ :In the timeline you can click on the obituaries I found, and where I found him in the census. I also debunked the three madeup stories about him by reading the obituaries and the original newspaper accounts. I have a subscription to ancestry.com and the New York Times archive, so I can access papers from 1841 to the present. I found three movie stars that lied about their birth dates, and Encyclopedia Britannica has the wrong dates. --[[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] 05:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

530960 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-21 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.269170460E09 +++$+++ Thank You for helping me. The information was very helpful. --''' +++$+++ Thank You for helping me. The information was very helpful. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 04:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
530961 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530960 +++$+++ 530960 +++$+++ 2010-03-22 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.269252840E09 +++$+++ No big deal. You just add a section heading by adding 2 equal signs to start and end the section title. Then you put the heading in between. Also, you sign by adding the ~ symbol 4 times. At any rate, you can join WikiProject Wisconsin by clicking [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Wisconsin|here]] and adding your name to the list of members. You can announce on your user page ([[User:Mmaccceo]]) that you're a member by adding <nowiki>{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Wisconsin\/Userbox}}<\/nowiki> . Feel free to copy anything that you find on anyone's userpage if you find it useful. Wikipedia is built on using other people's good ideas and methods. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :No big deal. You just add a section heading by adding 2 equal signs to start and end the section title. Then you put the heading in between. Also, you sign by adding the ~ symbol 4 times. At any rate, you can join WikiProject Wisconsin by clicking [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Wisconsin|here]] and adding your name to the list of members. You can announce on your user page ([[User:Mmaccceo]]) that you're a member by adding <nowiki>{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Wisconsin/Userbox}}</nowiki> . Feel free to copy anything that you find on anyone's userpage if you find it useful. Wikipedia is built on using other people's good ideas and methods. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

263256 +++$+++ Johncarvill +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-06 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.126065660E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Johncarvill|Johncarvill]] 21:01, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
263257 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263256 +++$+++ 263256 +++$+++ 2005-09-06 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.126067940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 21:39, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

530962 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-22 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.269247320E09 +++$+++ If you have a lot of time would you please help me complete this [[2010 Food City 500|article]]. I don't have a lot of time because of school, but I will try my best to help.(On the section of ''Race Summary'' you should go to [[2010 Food City 500 Race Summary]]; and to complete the section ''Results'' you need to go to [http:\/\/www.nascar.com\/races\/cup\/2010\/5\/data\/results_unofficial.html Unofficial Results].) Thank You. --''' +++$+++ If you have a lot of time would you please help me complete this [[2010 Food City 500|article]]. I don't have a lot of time because of school, but I will try my best to help.(On the section of ''Race Summary'' you should go to [[2010 Food City 500 Race Summary]]; and to complete the section ''Results'' you need to go to [http://www.nascar.com/races/cup/2010/5/data/results_unofficial.html Unofficial Results].) Thank You. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 01:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
530963 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530962 +++$+++ 530962 +++$+++ 2010-03-22 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.269253080E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I don't do them and I've never done them. I'm fine with other people doing them but I don't spend the time. I'd rather let someone find the race results somewhere else. Except if it was a all-time famous race like I did with a few of the major Daytona 500s and the 1992 season finale at Atlanta which was Petty's last, Gordon's first, and many drivers competed for the championship which was won by one of my favorites Alan Kulwicki. Sorry! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Sorry, I don't do them and I've never done them. I'm fine with other people doing them but I don't spend the time. I'd rather let someone find the race results somewhere else. Except if it was a all-time famous race like I did with a few of the major Daytona 500s and the 1992 season finale at Atlanta which was Petty's last, Gordon's first, and many drivers competed for the championship which was won by one of my favorites Alan Kulwicki. Sorry! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:18, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
530964 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530962 +++$+++ 530963 +++$+++ 2010-03-22 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.269324300E09 +++$+++ Its ok; I will finish it sooner or later. --''' +++$+++ ::Its ok; I will finish it sooner or later. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 23:05, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
530965 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530962 +++$+++ 530964 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.269410220E09 +++$+++ Would you see what rating [[2010 Food City 500]] has now after most of it is complete. --''' +++$+++ :::Would you see what rating [[2010 Food City 500]] has now after most of it is complete. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 22:57, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
530966 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530962 +++$+++ 530965 +++$+++ 2010-03-24 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.269416280E09 +++$+++ I would assess as C-Class just short of B class. The big problem is the missing [[WP:CITE|inline citations]] for the content. Lots of sentences without citation. Plus the results tables need sources - you just need to do it on the first line if the entire table comes from a single source. The qualifying results would be helpful - a separate table or add to the results table. The writing is up to B level and not far away from [[WP:GA|Good Article]] level! I copyedited most of the prose in the article at the B-class level. VERY WELL DONE! I'm very impressed that you did something this great! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::I would assess as C-Class just short of B class. The big problem is the missing [[WP:CITE|inline citations]] for the content. Lots of sentences without citation. Plus the results tables need sources - you just need to do it on the first line if the entire table comes from a single source. The qualifying results would be helpful - a separate table or add to the results table. The writing is up to B level and not far away from [[WP:GA|Good Article]] level! I copyedited most of the prose in the article at the B-class level. VERY WELL DONE! I'm very impressed that you did something this great! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:38, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
530967 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530962 +++$+++ 530966 +++$+++ 2010-03-24 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.269417060E09 +++$+++ Thank You, I will add the rest of the information. --''' +++$+++ :::::Thank You, I will add the rest of the information. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 00:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
530968 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530962 +++$+++ 530967 +++$+++ 2010-03-24 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.269418500E09 +++$+++ I added references and made the table sortable so you would just have to push the icon beside starting pos to get the line up. --''' +++$+++ ::::::I added references and made the table sortable so you would just have to push the icon beside starting pos to get the line up. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 01:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
530969 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530962 +++$+++ 530968 +++$+++ 2010-03-24 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.269422460E09 +++$+++ Oh, I get what you were trying to do with the lap by lap reference. You're supposed to do at least one per paragraph, so I added it at the end of each paragraph like I commonly see. Check out the article's history to see how I used a named reference so that I didn't have to repeat the reference each time [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=2010_Food_City_500&diff=351692520&oldid=351681660]. You just pick a different name for each reference. That's how you're supposed to do when you use a reference multiple times. You keep adding that the language is English - that information is only used in foreign languages. I reassessed as B class. Let me know if you want to [[WP:GAN|nominate it for Good Article]] and I'll do a more thorough grammar review. You're in the ballpark for Good Article on this one! Constructive criticism is that the sentences in the race summary are a bit choppy and (especially) monotonous so they should be varied more. Another comment is that there should be more references used to get a broader perspective from different media outlets. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::::Oh, I get what you were trying to do with the lap by lap reference. You're supposed to do at least one per paragraph, so I added it at the end of each paragraph like I commonly see. Check out the article's history to see how I used a named reference so that I didn't have to repeat the reference each time [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2010_Food_City_500&diff=351692520&oldid=351681660]. You just pick a different name for each reference. That's how you're supposed to do when you use a reference multiple times. You keep adding that the language is English - that information is only used in foreign languages. I reassessed as B class. Let me know if you want to [[WP:GAN|nominate it for Good Article]] and I'll do a more thorough grammar review. You're in the ballpark for Good Article on this one! Constructive criticism is that the sentences in the race summary are a bit choppy and (especially) monotonous so they should be varied more. Another comment is that there should be more references used to get a broader perspective from different media outlets. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:21, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

268820 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268820 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-19 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.227094740E09 +++$+++ Hello Mattisse, I have repsonded to your concerns. Thanks, ''' +++$+++ Hello Mattisse, I have repsonded to your concerns. Thanks, '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:YellowMonkey#Straw_poll_for_selecting_photos_of_Australia_at_the_2008_Summer_Olympics|<font color="#FA8605">click here to choose Australia's next top model</font>]]'') 03:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
268821 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268820 +++$+++ 268820 +++$+++ 2008-11-20 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.227178320E09 +++$+++ And some more. ''' +++$+++ :And some more. '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]''' (''[[User talk:YellowMonkey#Straw_poll_for_selecting_photos_of_Australia_at_the_2008_Summer_Olympics|<font color="#FA8605">click here to choose Australia's next top model!</font>]]'') 02:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

88494 +++$+++ VKokielov +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-09 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.118306640E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:VKokielov|VKokielov]] 01:44, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
88495 +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88494 +++$+++ 88494 +++$+++ 2005-06-09 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.118342580E09 +++$+++ Awww, thanks :) -- +++$+++ : Awww, thanks :) --[[User:Joy|Joy <small><small>&#91;shallot&#93;</small></small>]] 11:43, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

268822 +++$+++ Dweller +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-23 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.227470760E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse&diff=253532319&oldid=253531865 This comment] was completely inappropriate. Any repetition of that kind of thing will result in a block. Consider yourself lucky I've not blocked you now. -- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse&diff=253532319&oldid=253531865 This comment] was completely inappropriate. Any repetition of that kind of thing will result in a block. Consider yourself lucky I've not blocked you now. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 12:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268823 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268822 +++$+++ 268822 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.227492120E09 +++$+++ What is out of line, but sadly all too common these days, is an administrator threatening a punitive block almost eight hours after the alleged offence, contrary to wikipedia's [[WP:Blocking Policy|blocking policy]]. -- +++$+++ :What is out of line, but sadly all too common these days, is an administrator threatening a punitive block almost eight hours after the alleged offence, contrary to wikipedia's [[WP:Blocking Policy|blocking policy]]. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 18:02, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268824 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268822 +++$+++ 268823 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.227493860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for you comment to me, Malleus. The FAC crowd is tiresome. There was a long self-righteous rant against me on the FAC talk page, and a whole title  \"Mattise\" on SandyGeorgia's talk page, asking her to please stop me from opposing that FAC. The result is  a casual disregard for the truth in the article.  The standards  of FAC when it is submitted by one of their \"own\"  are low  -  I have never been very tolerant of hypocrisy. Consider this a statement of my current bitterness.   &mdash; +++$+++ ::Thanks for you comment to me, Malleus. The FAC crowd is tiresome. There was a long self-righteous rant against me on the FAC talk page, and a whole title  "Mattise" on SandyGeorgia's talk page, asking her to please stop me from opposing that FAC. The result is  a casual disregard for the truth in the article.  The standards  of FAC when it is submitted by one of their "own"  are low  -  I have never been very tolerant of hypocrisy. Consider this a statement of my current bitterness.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268825 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268822 +++$+++ 268824 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.227494460E09 +++$+++ I haven't read the article, and I have no intention of getting involved with it, but it will be for SandyG to weigh the arguments put forwards both for and against its promotion. It's not something worth inviting a block over either way. Although administrators aren't supposed to issue punitive blocks, many of them do under one pretext or another, and from personal experience I can tell you that being blocked won't do much for your temper. Time to leave this one behind you now I think. :-) -- +++$+++ :::I haven't read the article, and I have no intention of getting involved with it, but it will be for SandyG to weigh the arguments put forwards both for and against its promotion. It's not something worth inviting a block over either way. Although administrators aren't supposed to issue punitive blocks, many of them do under one pretext or another, and from personal experience I can tell you that being blocked won't do much for your temper. Time to leave this one behind you now I think. :-) --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 18:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268826 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268822 +++$+++ 268825 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.227494580E09 +++$+++ Yeah. Casliber knew it was a joke anyway. {{diff2|253551195|07:30, 23 November 2008 Casliber (Talk &#124; contribs) (46,441 bytes) (hahaha)}} But do I still have to worry about a block from this guy?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Yeah. Casliber knew it was a joke anyway. {{diff2|253551195|07:30, 23 November 2008 Casliber (Talk &#124; contribs) (46,441 bytes) (hahaha)}} But do I still have to worry about a block from this guy?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268827 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268822 +++$+++ 268826 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.227495000E09 +++$+++ Who knows? Administrators are only human, in spite of all evidence to the contrary, and don't always look at all of the evidence before they act. I suggest ignoring it, the administrator, the MDD article, its FAC, and all those whose comments stung you, and get on with something else. You'll always be outgunned in a dispute with anyone who has their finger on the block button. -- +++$+++ :::::Who knows? Administrators are only human, in spite of all evidence to the contrary, and don't always look at all of the evidence before they act. I suggest ignoring it, the administrator, the MDD article, its FAC, and all those whose comments stung you, and get on with something else. You'll always be outgunned in a dispute with anyone who has their finger on the block button. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 18:50, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

6680 +++$+++ Merlinme +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.174527720E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Merlinme|Merlinme]] 18:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
6681 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6680 +++$+++ 6680 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.174548240E09 +++$+++ I hope you will find the time to read some of the research articles I linked to in the Sandbox.  I also hope you will look into the debate regarding the pseudoscientific way the Warmers have been conducting themselves. Best wishes.  +++$+++ :I hope you will find the time to read some of the research articles I linked to in the Sandbox.  I also hope you will look into the debate regarding the pseudoscientific way the Warmers have been conducting themselves. Best wishes. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 00:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
6682 +++$+++ Merlinme +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6680 +++$+++ 6681 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.174614540E09 +++$+++ Again, while I think everyone would recognise the limitations in the models, the fact is that they do model past observations well (see: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Climate_Change_Attribution.png). It therefore seems reasonable to assume that they will model the future tolerably well. Or at least, it seems better than rolling a dice to say how much we think temperature is going to go up or down. Economists always get it wrong when predicting the economy, but that doesn't make their predictions ''worthless''. It just means you have to take them with a pinch of salt. In particular, you have to take into account the fact that they are never going to be able to predict abrupt changes. So it may well be the case that the observed warming speeds up or slows down because of some amplified feedback (most would argue speeds up, but no-one's sure). Such step changes will not be shown by current models, which are based on the recently observed past. But to use this as an excuse not to even ''try'' to work out what's happening just seems like an abdication of responsibility to me. I mean, if an economist told you he thought the economy was 90% likely to go into recession this year, would you completely ignore him when deciding government policy? Even if you thought he was more likely to be wrong than right, it seems sensible to me to take out some precautions. If a bad weather forecaster predicts rain, it seems sensible to me to carry an umbrella. -- +++$+++ ::Again, while I think everyone would recognise the limitations in the models, the fact is that they do model past observations well (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Climate_Change_Attribution.png). It therefore seems reasonable to assume that they will model the future tolerably well. Or at least, it seems better than rolling a dice to say how much we think temperature is going to go up or down. Economists always get it wrong when predicting the economy, but that doesn't make their predictions ''worthless''. It just means you have to take them with a pinch of salt. In particular, you have to take into account the fact that they are never going to be able to predict abrupt changes. So it may well be the case that the observed warming speeds up or slows down because of some amplified feedback (most would argue speeds up, but no-one's sure). Such step changes will not be shown by current models, which are based on the recently observed past. But to use this as an excuse not to even ''try'' to work out what's happening just seems like an abdication of responsibility to me. I mean, if an economist told you he thought the economy was 90% likely to go into recession this year, would you completely ignore him when deciding government policy? Even if you thought he was more likely to be wrong than right, it seems sensible to me to take out some precautions. If a bad weather forecaster predicts rain, it seems sensible to me to carry an umbrella. --[[User:Merlinme|Merlinme]] 18:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

530970 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-24 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.269499140E09 +++$+++ First, I don't want to nominate it for good article quite yet then may I ask what does monotonous mean? Finaly what do you mean by different media outlet? Different url's? Or add books or magazines? Thank You. --''' +++$+++ First, I don't want to nominate it for good article quite yet then may I ask what does monotonous mean? Finaly what do you mean by different media outlet? Different url's? Or add books or magazines? Thank You. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 23:39, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
530971 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530970 +++$+++ 530970 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.269500940E09 +++$+++ I won't nominate it for Good Article - that's up to you as the author. By monotonous, I mean that the prose isn't varied enough. There's a pattern to much of it. By different media outlets - I mean that you should get someone else's interpretation of the race. Find some race reports\/descriptions by ESPN, Sporting News, Sports Illustrated, some big newspapers like NY Times\/Miami Herald\/Charlotte, Yahoo Sports, etc. and see what they emphasize. Right now it's almost all official NASCAR. I would expect a typical Good Article draw from at least 10 different sources. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I won't nominate it for Good Article - that's up to you as the author. By monotonous, I mean that the prose isn't varied enough. There's a pattern to much of it. By different media outlets - I mean that you should get someone else's interpretation of the race. Find some race reports/descriptions by ESPN, Sporting News, Sports Illustrated, some big newspapers like NY Times/Miami Herald/Charlotte, Yahoo Sports, etc. and see what they emphasize. Right now it's almost all official NASCAR. I would expect a typical Good Article draw from at least 10 different sources. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:09, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
530972 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530970 +++$+++ 530971 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.269502020E09 +++$+++ Ok, if you want to nominate the article you can because I'm not too sure about the concept. Thats not all though I would like the article to be good and that is the reason I edit it; to help Wikipedia's status as a world-wide website. I also said it is up to because you have been on Wikipedia longer. I agree with whatever you choose to do. Thank You. --''' +++$+++ ::Ok, if you want to nominate the article you can because I'm not too sure about the concept. Thats not all though I would like the article to be good and that is the reason I edit it; to help Wikipedia's status as a world-wide website. I also said it is up to because you have been on Wikipedia longer. I agree with whatever you choose to do. Thank You. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 00:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
530973 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530970 +++$+++ 530972 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.269502200E09 +++$+++ First, I won't nominate it. You will need to do nominating. Second, it's not ready anyhow. You've done a lot of excellent work on it but not enough. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::First, I won't nominate it. You will need to do nominating. Second, it's not ready anyhow. You've done a lot of excellent work on it but not enough. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:30, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
530974 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530970 +++$+++ 530973 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.269502620E09 +++$+++ Okay I will work on it. On the race reports to you mean like [http:\/\/stewartent.com\/stewart-haas-racing-food-city-500-race-report\/2010\/03\/21\/ Tony Stewart's] or something else? Would the race reports be a reference also; where would I need to put it? Thanks for helping me create my first good article. --''' +++$+++ ::::Okay I will work on it. On the race reports to you mean like [http://stewartent.com/stewart-haas-racing-food-city-500-race-report/2010/03/21/ Tony Stewart's] or something else? Would the race reports be a reference also; where would I need to put it? Thanks for helping me create my first good article. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 00:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
530975 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530970 +++$+++ 530974 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.269503940E09 +++$+++ Oh, good question. I didn't mean a race report like you found for Tony Stewart. That's more like a blog which shouldn't be used except in rare cases to quote something specific. I mean articles like race reports found at places like [http:\/\/sports.yahoo.com\/nascar Yahoo! Sports], [http:\/\/espn.go.com\/racing\/nascar\/ ESPN] specifically [http:\/\/sports.espn.go.com\/rpm\/nascar\/cup\/news\/story?id=5016034 this], etc. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::Oh, good question. I didn't mean a race report like you found for Tony Stewart. That's more like a blog which shouldn't be used except in rare cases to quote something specific. I mean articles like race reports found at places like [http://sports.yahoo.com/nascar Yahoo! Sports], [http://espn.go.com/racing/nascar/ ESPN] specifically [http://sports.espn.go.com/rpm/nascar/cup/news/story?id=5016034 this], etc. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
530976 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530970 +++$+++ 530975 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.269504180E09 +++$+++ Can they just be a video, and they would be marked as a reference right? If they are supposed to be references where would I put them? --''' +++$+++ ::::::Can they just be a video, and they would be marked as a reference right? If they are supposed to be references where would I put them? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 01:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
530977 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530970 +++$+++ 530976 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.269504720E09 +++$+++ I suppose they could be a video, but that's rare. It should be a major well-known source. You put the source after each sentence that uses them. You caught the name trick for multiple uses, right? '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::::I suppose they could be a video, but that's rare. It should be a major well-known source. You put the source after each sentence that uses them. You caught the name trick for multiple uses, right? '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:12, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

6685 +++$+++ Ed Poor +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-24 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.174774680E09 +++$+++ Hate to be a spoilsport, but I am going out for a walk. Perhaps we can continue our collaboration later today. Thanks for your attention to the issues of scientific objectivity and editorial neutrality. -- +++$+++ Hate to be a spoilsport, but I am going out for a walk. Perhaps we can continue our collaboration later today. Thanks for your attention to the issues of scientific objectivity and editorial neutrality. --[[User:Ed Poor|Uncle Ed]] 15:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
6686 +++$+++ Ed Poor +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6685 +++$+++ 6685 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.174856880E09 +++$+++ There is a world of difference between (1) partisan, biased writing and (2) neutral writing. It's not easy, but I'd like to help you if you'll let me. -- +++$+++ :There is a world of difference between (1) partisan, biased writing and (2) neutral writing. It's not easy, but I'd like to help you if you'll let me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Uncle Ed]] 14:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
6687 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6685 +++$+++ 6686 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.174857360E09 +++$+++ Ed, nowhere do I say that Mann is guilty of pseudoscience.  I am merely saying that data withholding is pseudoscience, a fact that is verifiable from the textbooks I quoted. I also say Mann is guilty of data withholding, another fact that is verifiable from reliable sources.  If you do not think Mann is guilty of data withholding, you can say so. I do not tie the two facts together.  The article is much larger than the question of how it relates to climate science.  I used to be an executive in the pharmaceutical industry. I know how it affects drug development also. This is an important issue.  I do wish you would read the whole article. The best version is here. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Scientific_data_archiving&oldid=117744149]  +++$+++ ::Ed, nowhere do I say that Mann is guilty of pseudoscience.  I am merely saying that data withholding is pseudoscience, a fact that is verifiable from the textbooks I quoted. I also say Mann is guilty of data withholding, another fact that is verifiable from reliable sources.  If you do not think Mann is guilty of data withholding, you can say so. I do not tie the two facts together.  The article is much larger than the question of how it relates to climate science.  I used to be an executive in the pharmaceutical industry. I know how it affects drug development also. This is an important issue.  I do wish you would read the whole article. The best version is here. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_data_archiving&oldid=117744149] [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 14:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
6688 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6685 +++$+++ 6686 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.174866360E09 +++$+++ Ed, yes, you have that correct.  I have provided reliable sources saying that data withholding is pseudoscience.  I have reliable sources showing Mann refused to provide data.  Nowhere does the article say Mann engages in pseudoscience because I do not have reliable source saying that.  BTW, I found a reliable source on the involvement of Congress and their request that he provide his source code.  I will add the info on the Talk page.  +++$+++ ::Ed, yes, you have that correct.  I have provided reliable sources saying that data withholding is pseudoscience.  I have reliable sources showing Mann refused to provide data.  Nowhere does the article say Mann engages in pseudoscience because I do not have reliable source saying that.  BTW, I found a reliable source on the involvement of Congress and their request that he provide his source code.  I will add the info on the Talk page. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 16:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

541423 +++$+++ 2over0 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541423 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-27 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.243432260E09 +++$+++ Would you be willing to email to me a copy of [[Quantum fractal]] or drop a copy in  +++$+++ Would you be willing to email to me a copy of [[Quantum fractal]] or drop a copy in [[User:2over0/Quantum fractal|my userspace]] if that is easier? Skimming the sources presented in the AfD, I think that there could be a valid article at that title, but the mention of hoax indicates that that probably was not it. Best regards, - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 06:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
541424 +++$+++ 2over0 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541423 +++$+++ 541423 +++$+++ 2009-05-27 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.243432560E09 +++$+++ You are most kind :). -  +++$+++ : You are most kind :). - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 06:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

6690 +++$+++ Zeeboid +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-27 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.175042760E09 +++$+++ RonCram, I am trying to get more information to see if it is a [[WP:COI|Conflict of Intrest violation]] for an Environmental [[Activist]]\/[[Green Party]] member to be actavly editing pages that have to do with Environmental issues.  Your thoughts?-- +++$+++ RonCram, I am trying to get more information to see if it is a [[WP:COI|Conflict of Intrest violation]] for an Environmental [[Activist]]/[[Green Party]] member to be actavly editing pages that have to do with Environmental issues.  Your thoughts?--[[User:Zeeboid|Zeeboid]] 17:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
6691 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6690 +++$+++ 6690 +++$+++ 2007-03-31 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.175369280E09 +++$+++ Zeeboid, sorry it has taken me so long to respond. Business has been very good and I have not had a moment to myself. This is the first chance I've had to give a thoughtful response. It is 5 am Saturday morning as I write this. Thanks for drawing my attention to this guideline.  As I understand it, the guideline (as it is currently written) yields to [[Wikipedia:Etiquette]] which requires editors to assume good faith.  The intention is for the guideline on COI to be used for self-governing and not to be used to win an edit war.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/WP:COI#Conflict_of_interest_in_point_of_view_disputes] The best option seems to be to direct the activist to the guideline and to make certain he understands it.  If he continues to make controversial edits or edit war regarding subjects where he has a financial interest or is publicly identified with, it appears that you may take the matter to the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest\/Noticeboard]  Without knowing more about the specific situation, it would be difficult for me to comment further. +++$+++ :Zeeboid, sorry it has taken me so long to respond. Business has been very good and I have not had a moment to myself. This is the first chance I've had to give a thoughtful response. It is 5 am Saturday morning as I write this. Thanks for drawing my attention to this guideline.  As I understand it, the guideline (as it is currently written) yields to [[Wikipedia:Etiquette]] which requires editors to assume good faith.  The intention is for the guideline on COI to be used for self-governing and not to be used to win an edit war.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:COI#Conflict_of_interest_in_point_of_view_disputes] The best option seems to be to direct the activist to the guideline and to make certain he understands it.  If he continues to make controversial edits or edit war regarding subjects where he has a financial interest or is publicly identified with, it appears that you may take the matter to the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard]  Without knowing more about the specific situation, it would be difficult for me to comment further.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 12:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

6692 +++$+++ BozMo +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-03 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.175608500E09 +++$+++ Please don't canvas at the AfD for [[Scientific data withholding]]. I am afraid I voted delete although it was mainly to do with the title which isn't right. I don't know if we have enough content on the scientific method but certainly auditability is important. There is a lot of stuff around on drug approvals on this topic. -- +++$+++ Please don't canvas at the AfD for [[Scientific data withholding]]. I am afraid I voted delete although it was mainly to do with the title which isn't right. I don't know if we have enough content on the scientific method but certainly auditability is important. There is a lot of stuff around on drug approvals on this topic. --[[User:BozMo|BozMo]] [[user talk:BozMo|talk]] 06:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
6693 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6692 +++$+++ 6692 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.175635500E09 +++$+++ What does \"please don't canvas\" mean? Why do you think the title is not right?  If you google \"data withholding\" and \"science\" you get lots of hits.  \"Data withholding\" is the proper term for refusing to provide data when requested. It is a big problem in medical and several other fields, including Earth Sciences.  +++$+++ :What does "please don't canvas" mean? Why do you think the title is not right?  If you google "data withholding" and "science" you get lots of hits.  "Data withholding" is the proper term for refusing to provide data when requested. It is a big problem in medical and several other fields, including Earth Sciences. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 14:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
6694 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6692 +++$+++ 6693 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.175637060E09 +++$+++ \"Please don't canvas\" means exactly what it says. [[Canvassing]] (by leaving notes on user talk pages for users likely favourable to your desired result) is frowned uppon in Wikipedia.-- +++$+++ ::"Please don't canvas" means exactly what it says. [[Canvassing]] (by leaving notes on user talk pages for users likely favourable to your desired result) is frowned uppon in Wikipedia.--[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 14:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
6695 +++$+++ Zeeboid +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6692 +++$+++ 6694 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.175637240E09 +++$+++ Yea, you should be sending e-mails to people on your side, or communicatin through outside environmental blogs... isn't that right, Stephan?-- +++$+++ :::Yea, you should be sending e-mails to people on your side, or communicatin through outside environmental blogs... isn't that right, Stephan?--[[User:Zeeboid|Zeeboid]] 14:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
6696 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6692 +++$+++ 6695 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.175638920E09 +++$+++ [[Mu (negative)|Mu]]. -- +++$+++ ::::[[Mu (negative)|Mu]]. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 15:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
6697 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6692 +++$+++ 6696 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.175648280E09 +++$+++ Stephan, Mu is just another way of pleading the 5th. +++$+++ :::::Stephan, Mu is just another way of pleading the 5th.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 17:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
6698 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6692 +++$+++ 6697 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.175652120E09 +++$+++ Actually, no, it is not. It is a short way of saying \"Your assumptions are so <s>terminally stupid<\/s> failing to conform to my view of reality that I don't see any value in continuing this particular discussion\/answer that particular question\". Click the link. And to avoid any misunderstanding, I [[mu (negative)|mued]] Zeeboid, not you. You can read this as me denying that I'm part of a huge secret network of public environmental blogs and  mailing lists used for coordination by the EAC (Eco-Activist Cabal).-- +++$+++ ::::::Actually, no, it is not. It is a short way of saying "Your assumptions are so <s>terminally stupid</s> failing to conform to my view of reality that I don't see any value in continuing this particular discussion/answer that particular question". Click the link. And to avoid any misunderstanding, I [[mu (negative)|mued]] Zeeboid, not you. You can read this as me denying that I'm part of a huge secret network of public environmental blogs and  mailing lists used for coordination by the EAC (Eco-Activist Cabal).--[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 19:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

321271 +++$+++ JNW +++$+++ Modernist +++$+++ 321271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-13 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.186995120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:JNW|JNW]] 01:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
321272 +++$+++ Modernist +++$+++ Modernist +++$+++ 321271 +++$+++ 321271 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.186995540E09 +++$+++ Actually I have lots coming at me this fall, real stuff, in real life, but I'll help you if you need. Lets think about it.  +++$+++ :Actually I have lots coming at me this fall, real stuff, in real life, but I'll help you if you need. Lets think about it. [[User:Modernist|Modernist]] 01:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
321273 +++$+++ JNW +++$+++ Modernist +++$+++ 321271 +++$+++ 321272 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.186995900E09 +++$+++ Yes, real life, not this wikified version. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Yes, real life, not this wikified version. Cheers, [[User:JNW|JNW]] 02:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

525404 +++$+++ G716 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-24 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.185314340E09 +++$+++ All the diseases in your template are human diseases.  Now that you've added HFM, should we remove foot and mouth, which I think is a bovine disease.  Didn't want to do this without checking with you first.-- +++$+++ All the diseases in your template are human diseases.  Now that you've added HFM, should we remove foot and mouth, which I think is a bovine disease.  Didn't want to do this without checking with you first.--[[User:G716|G716]] 14:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
525405 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525404 +++$+++ 525404 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.185325560E09 +++$+++ [[Foot-and-mouth disease]] is primarily an animal disease, but it is [http:\/\/www.who.int\/classifications\/apps\/icd\/icd10online\/?gb00.htm+b088 listed] in [[ICD10]] under B08.8, so by definition it is classified as a human condition as well. I wouldn't be offended if you wanted to remove it from [[Template:Viral diseases]], but one advantage of keeping it in is that people will be less confused about the difference between that condition and [[Hand, foot and mouth disease]] if they see the two right next to each other. Do what you think is best. (Or if you want more feedback, leave a note on the talk page of the template, and wait a couple of weeks. Probably nobody will answer, but it will facilitate future discussion.) -- +++$+++ :[[Foot-and-mouth disease]] is primarily an animal disease, but it is [http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/?gb00.htm+b088 listed] in [[ICD10]] under B08.8, so by definition it is classified as a human condition as well. I wouldn't be offended if you wanted to remove it from [[Template:Viral diseases]], but one advantage of keeping it in is that people will be less confused about the difference between that condition and [[Hand, foot and mouth disease]] if they see the two right next to each other. Do what you think is best. (Or if you want more feedback, leave a note on the talk page of the template, and wait a couple of weeks. Probably nobody will answer, but it will facilitate future discussion.) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 18:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

268842 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268842 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-23 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.227431820E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I am so sorry that you have to put up with disrespectful users. Someone suggested that I nominate [[Puerto Rican scientists and inventors]] for \"FL\". I was wondering if you could please look it over and tell me what you think and if you have any suggestions. Take care,  +++$+++ Mattisse, I am so sorry that you have to put up with disrespectful users. Someone suggested that I nominate [[Puerto Rican scientists and inventors]] for "FL". I was wondering if you could please look it over and tell me what you think and if you have any suggestions. Take care, [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 01:17, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268843 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268842 +++$+++ 268842 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.227441240E09 +++$+++ It looks like you put a lot of hard work into it. I will have to bone up on featured lists, as I know nothing about them at all. Tomorrow, O.K.?  &mdash; +++$+++ :It looks like you put a lot of hard work into it. I will have to bone up on featured lists, as I know nothing about them at all. Tomorrow, O.K.?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268844 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268842 +++$+++ 268842 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.227443940E09 +++$+++ Good.  +++$+++ *Good. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 04:39, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268845 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268842 +++$+++ 268842 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.227505860E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, take it easy and don't worry too much about my request, I'm not too much interested in the \"FL\" anyways. I'm a little hesitant to nominate any of my articles with the way things are handled here anyway. I can't tell you to not be discouraged with things here, just try to go back to basics, to what attracted you to Wikipedia in the first place. I remember last year when my admin powers were taken away and some people made some disrespectful remarks. I felt like hanging it up, but I put in too much into this project to leave. I told myself, to hell with everybody else and what they think, my mission here is to educate and share my knowledge. I know that my work has received international recognition and that is why I could care less if my articles are featured or not. I went back to doing what I enjoyed doing in Wikipedia in the first place. Don't let the those who act like children, who are making a big deal over an issue which should have been forgotten already get the better part of you and go back to the basics. What ever you decide I'm with you.  +++$+++ :Mattisse, take it easy and don't worry too much about my request, I'm not too much interested in the "FL" anyways. I'm a little hesitant to nominate any of my articles with the way things are handled here anyway. I can't tell you to not be discouraged with things here, just try to go back to basics, to what attracted you to Wikipedia in the first place. I remember last year when my admin powers were taken away and some people made some disrespectful remarks. I felt like hanging it up, but I put in too much into this project to leave. I told myself, to hell with everybody else and what they think, my mission here is to educate and share my knowledge. I know that my work has received international recognition and that is why I could care less if my articles are featured or not. I went back to doing what I enjoyed doing in Wikipedia in the first place. Don't let the those who act like children, who are making a big deal over an issue which should have been forgotten already get the better part of you and go back to the basics. What ever you decide I'm with you. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 21:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268846 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268842 +++$+++ 268845 +++$+++ 2008-11-24 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.227583920E09 +++$+++ Tony, thank you so much for your post. It touched my heart and put the situation in perspective. You are right about maintaining a focus on what is truly important, and to avoid being caught up in the detracting negativity. I did used to enjoy Wikipedia, mainly when I was writing my own articles, so I have to discover a way to enjoy it again and have a mission greater than what others here think is important. You have been able to keep your wonderful, productive attitude that has enabled you to continue to do your constructive work. I will seek to follow your example. You have brightened my outlook by your honesty. Thank you! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::Tony, thank you so much for your post. It touched my heart and put the situation in perspective. You are right about maintaining a focus on what is truly important, and to avoid being caught up in the detracting negativity. I did used to enjoy Wikipedia, mainly when I was writing my own articles, so I have to discover a way to enjoy it again and have a mission greater than what others here think is important. You have been able to keep your wonderful, productive attitude that has enabled you to continue to do your constructive work. I will seek to follow your example. You have brightened my outlook by your honesty. Thank you! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

6699 +++$+++ William M. Connolley +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-03 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.175650500E09 +++$+++ Please don't avoid the point: ''Do not message editors about AfD nominations because they support your view on the topic. This can be seen as votestacking. See Wikipedia:Canvassing for guidelines.'' [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion]  +++$+++ Please don't avoid the point: ''Do not message editors about AfD nominations because they support your view on the topic. This can be seen as votestacking. See Wikipedia:Canvassing for guidelines.'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion] [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 18:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
6700 +++$+++ Zeeboid +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6699 +++$+++ 6699 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.175652360E09 +++$+++ Whats your deffinition of \"'''mass''' talk messages\" William?  The American Heritage Dictionary lists it as: \"A large but nonspecific amount or number\" then defines \"Large\" as \"Of greater than average size, extent, quantity, or amount; big.\"  I would argue that [[User:RonCram]]'s informing users of your... \"issue\" was not \"Of greater then average\" size.  Would you Ron?-- +++$+++ :Whats your deffinition of "'''mass''' talk messages" William?  The American Heritage Dictionary lists it as: "A large but nonspecific amount or number" then defines "Large" as "Of greater than average size, extent, quantity, or amount; big."  I would argue that [[User:RonCram]]'s informing users of your... "issue" was not "Of greater then average" size.  Would you Ron?--[[User:Zeeboid|Zeeboid]] 19:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
6701 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6699 +++$+++ 6700 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.175652840E09 +++$+++ I do not know why you ask that particular question. The word \"mass\" does not occur in William's quote. In fact, it does not occur anywhere in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#AfD_etiquette]] or, unless my browsers \"search\" is broken, anywhere in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]] at all.-- +++$+++ ::I do not know why you ask that particular question. The word "mass" does not occur in William's quote. In fact, it does not occur anywhere in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#AfD_etiquette]] or, unless my browsers "search" is broken, anywhere in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]] at all.--[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 19:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
6702 +++$+++ Zeeboid +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6699 +++$+++ 6699 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.175653260E09 +++$+++ Then you should read what william refrenced.  \"see [[Wikipedia:Canvassing]] for guidelines.  its laid out quite clear.\"-- +++$+++ :Then you should read what william refrenced.  "see [[Wikipedia:Canvassing]] for guidelines.  its laid out quite clear."--[[User:Zeeboid|Zeeboid]] 19:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
6703 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6699 +++$+++ 6702 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.175653740E09 +++$+++ So you claim that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AUBeR&diff=119900732&oldid=119886348 this] is a neutral message?-- +++$+++ ::So you claim that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AUBeR&diff=119900732&oldid=119886348 this] is a neutral message?--[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 19:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
6704 +++$+++ Zeeboid +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6699 +++$+++ 6703 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.175659620E09 +++$+++ Would you say that statement is inaccurate?  could you also point out to me please how you see it as not Neutral?  Come on Stephan, justify yourself.-- +++$+++ :::Would you say that statement is inaccurate?  could you also point out to me please how you see it as not Neutral?  Come on Stephan, justify yourself.--[[User:Zeeboid|Zeeboid]] 21:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
6705 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6699 +++$+++ 6704 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.175660220E09 +++$+++ No. [[Newspeak|Black is white and up is down]]. Play your own little games. -- +++$+++ ::::No. [[Newspeak|Black is white and up is down]]. Play your own little games. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 21:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

612786 +++$+++ Warlordjohncarter +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-12 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.184271960E09 +++$+++ Man, I can't believe I made that obvious a mistake. For what it's worth, I'm trying to ensure that the majority of the religion related projects get assessments done now, given the comparatively few articles that have been selected for the release versions. I will be getting to the EB assessments as soon as I get done with these others, though. Thanks for the notice, but there shouldn't be any problems whatever in correcting such a stupid error as I made here.  +++$+++ Man, I can't believe I made that obvious a mistake. For what it's worth, I'm trying to ensure that the majority of the religion related projects get assessments done now, given the comparatively few articles that have been selected for the release versions. I will be getting to the EB assessments as soon as I get done with these others, though. Thanks for the notice, but there shouldn't be any problems whatever in correcting such a stupid error as I made here. [[User:Warlordjohncarter|John Carter]] 13:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
612787 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612786 +++$+++ 612786 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.184272320E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that's it done now. These glitches happen very easily, I'm sure we've all done something of the sort. ..  +++$+++ :Thanks, that's it done now. These glitches happen very easily, I'm sure we've all done something of the sort. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 13:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

530990 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530990 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-27 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.269758820E09 +++$+++ If you would Royalbroil, would you give me a list about what needs done to [[Talladega Superspeedway]] on my talk page or its talkpage? Thank You. One more thing what did you mean by '' trick ''? --''' +++$+++ If you would Royalbroil, would you give me a list about what needs done to [[Talladega Superspeedway]] on my talk page or its talkpage? Thank You. One more thing what did you mean by '' trick ''? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 23:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
530991 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530990 +++$+++ 530990 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.269773760E09 +++$+++ I don't know where to start. I don't usually work on track articles, mainly biographies. The huge glaring problem is that there are very few references. I don't know what type of content should be in a good article about a racetrack. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I don't know where to start. I don't usually work on track articles, mainly biographies. The huge glaring problem is that there are very few references. I don't know what type of content should be in a good article about a racetrack. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
530992 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530990 +++$+++ 530991 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.269808680E09 +++$+++ Okay thats what I thought was wrong with the article, too. I have been rewriting the sentenes on the article, and I have added some references. Again, what did you mean by ''You caught the name trick for multiple uses, right?'' Thnak You. --''' +++$+++ ::Okay thats what I thought was wrong with the article, too. I have been rewriting the sentenes on the article, and I have added some references. Again, what did you mean by ''You caught the name trick for multiple uses, right?'' Thnak You. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 13:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
530993 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530990 +++$+++ 530992 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.269810240E09 +++$+++ The article [[2010 Food City 500]] now has ten different media outlets and twenty references. --''' +++$+++ :::The article [[2010 Food City 500]] now has ten different media outlets and twenty references. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 14:04, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
530994 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530990 +++$+++ 530993 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.269810480E09 +++$+++ I would loke to nominate the [[2010 Food City 500|article]] now. --''' +++$+++ ::::I would loke to nominate the [[2010 Food City 500|article]] now. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 14:08, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
530995 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530990 +++$+++ 530994 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.269843840E09 +++$+++ About the naming trick: I was talking about how you can create a reference once for a source and then keep reusing it by adding to the <nowiki><ref> with name=\"UniqueName\". You define it once (doesn't have to be first) by doing the whole ref like usual. After that you just type in <ref name=\"UniqueName\" \/><\/nowiki>. You need to use a different set of letters\/numbers for each reference and you add it where the \"word\" UniqueName is. I didn't explain everything, you should read about it [[WP:REFNAME|here]]. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::About the naming trick: I was talking about how you can create a reference once for a source and then keep reusing it by adding to the <nowiki><ref> with name="UniqueName". You define it once (doesn't have to be first) by doing the whole ref like usual. After that you just type in <ref name="UniqueName" /></nowiki>. You need to use a different set of letters/numbers for each reference and you add it where the "word" UniqueName is. I didn't explain everything, you should read about it [[WP:REFNAME|here]]. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
530996 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530990 +++$+++ 530995 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.269844140E09 +++$+++ Okay, for one I didn't know that it meant that, and I understand how to do that now. Thanks.--''' +++$+++ ::::::Okay, for one I didn't know that it meant that, and I understand how to do that now. Thanks.--'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 23:29, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

268847 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268847 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-23 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.227448020E09 +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, thanks for your comment at [[WT:DYK]].  I share your concern about keeping the DYK process from becoming too intimidating...I'm hoping that if we decide to design a template we can make it easy enough to be friendly for nominators, but still robust enough that reviewers won't have to clean up after a lot. I've left an example of what I'm thinking at the DYK talk page, so if you have any input I would really appreciate it. &mdash; +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, thanks for your comment at [[WT:DYK]].  I share your concern about keeping the DYK process from becoming too intimidating...I'm hoping that if we decide to design a template we can make it easy enough to be friendly for nominators, but still robust enough that reviewers won't have to clean up after a lot. I've left an example of what I'm thinking at the DYK talk page, so if you have any input I would really appreciate it. &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 05:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
268848 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268847 +++$+++ 268847 +++$+++ 2008-11-24 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.227595620E09 +++$+++ When were your last submissions (the ones that were ignored)?  &mdash; +++$+++ :When were your last submissions (the ones that were ignored)?  &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 22:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
268849 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268847 +++$+++ 268848 +++$+++ 2008-11-24 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.227596340E09 +++$+++ My last one was in September 2008, so it has been awhile. I does seem more organized there now. I must admit, I also lost interest completely in writing articles. Almost all of my DYK's were from articles I wrote, so I can't blame it all on DYK!  &mdash; +++$+++ ::My last one was in September 2008, so it has been awhile. I does seem more organized there now. I must admit, I also lost interest completely in writing articles. Almost all of my DYK's were from articles I wrote, so I can't blame it all on DYK!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:59, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

6706 +++$+++ BozMo +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-04 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.175699280E09 +++$+++ You asked very reasonably which word was new in this AfD. Okay, I don't strictly mean neologism I mean coining a new phrase which people won't look for. See [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=%22scientific+data+withholding%22&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rls=RNFA,RNFA:1970--2,RNFA:en] the phrase doesn't seem to exist. -- +++$+++ You asked very reasonably which word was new in this AfD. Okay, I don't strictly mean neologism I mean coining a new phrase which people won't look for. See [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22scientific+data+withholding%22&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rls=RNFA,RNFA:1970--2,RNFA:en] the phrase doesn't seem to exist. --[[User:BozMo|BozMo]] [[user talk:BozMo|talk]] 08:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
6707 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6706 +++$+++ 6706 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.175712900E09 +++$+++ \"Data withholding\" is a common term.  \"Data sharing\" is a common term. Check Yahoo out. [http:\/\/search.yahoo.com\/search?p=%22data+withholding%22&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8] You see there nearly 2,000 hits and the one at the top is the Wikipedia article William wants to delete. Check Google out. [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&q=%22data+withholding%22&btnG=Google+Search] You get more than 20,000 hits. Or you can Google \"data sharing\" which is the policy and you get more than 1,000,000 hits. [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&q=%22data+sharing%22] Not all of the \"data sharing\" hits deal with science - some are related to law enforcement and homeland security, etc. I do not want to sound rude here but \"data withholding\" and \"data sharing\" are common terms in science.  People do search for them. One of the problems with the AfD is that people vote without knowing taking the time to learn and consider all of the facts. William wants it deleted before people can see how valuable the article is.  I have to spend all of my time defending the article rather than making it better. And who is going to join me to make it better when it looks like it will be deleted?  Check out this article.  [http:\/\/datasharing.net\/]  +++$+++ :"Data withholding" is a common term.  "Data sharing" is a common term. Check Yahoo out. [http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=%22data+withholding%22&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8] You see there nearly 2,000 hits and the one at the top is the Wikipedia article William wants to delete. Check Google out. [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22data+withholding%22&btnG=Google+Search] You get more than 20,000 hits. Or you can Google "data sharing" which is the policy and you get more than 1,000,000 hits. [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22data+sharing%22] Not all of the "data sharing" hits deal with science - some are related to law enforcement and homeland security, etc. I do not want to sound rude here but "data withholding" and "data sharing" are common terms in science.  People do search for them. One of the problems with the AfD is that people vote without knowing taking the time to learn and consider all of the facts. William wants it deleted before people can see how valuable the article is.  I have to spend all of my time defending the article rather than making it better. And who is going to join me to make it better when it looks like it will be deleted?  Check out this article.  [http://datasharing.net/] [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 11:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
6708 +++$+++ BozMo +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6706 +++$+++ 6707 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.175714880E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, I am not sensitive to people being rude when they don't intend it. I don't have a problem with the \"data withholding\" part. I am sure there is a better name: perhaps even \"Data withholding (Science)\", if you could manage a non POV article on it. Then at least I would need to look at the position within articles on scientific method. Just the phrase as written in the title isn't right. -- +++$+++ ::Don't worry, I am not sensitive to people being rude when they don't intend it. I don't have a problem with the "data withholding" part. I am sure there is a better name: perhaps even "Data withholding (Science)", if you could manage a non POV article on it. Then at least I would need to look at the position within articles on scientific method. Just the phrase as written in the title isn't right. --[[User:BozMo|BozMo]] [[user talk:BozMo|talk]] 12:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
6709 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6706 +++$+++ 6708 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.175715840E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the reasonable response.  I would be fine with a name change.  If by \"NPOV,\" you mean an article that does not criticize Michael Mann - I am afraid that is not possible.  Michael Mann is the poster child for data withholding in climate science right now - although I think [[Phil Jones]] may be joining him soon.  If by \"NPOV,\" you mean an article William Connelly will favor - well, I don't think that is possible either.  William and Mann are co-contributors to RealClimate.  William is simply too close to Mann to allow certain well established facts to appear.[http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php?cat=10]  I have already put William on the COI noticeboard.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest\/Noticeboard#William_M._Connolley_.28talk_.C2.B7_contribs_.C2.B7_logs_.C2.B7_block_user_.C2.B7_block_log.29] +++$+++ :::Thank you for the reasonable response.  I would be fine with a name change.  If by "NPOV," you mean an article that does not criticize Michael Mann - I am afraid that is not possible.  Michael Mann is the poster child for data withholding in climate science right now - although I think [[Phil Jones]] may be joining him soon.  If by "NPOV," you mean an article William Connelly will favor - well, I don't think that is possible either.  William and Mann are co-contributors to RealClimate.  William is simply too close to Mann to allow certain well established facts to appear.[http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?cat=10]  I have already put William on the COI noticeboard.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#William_M._Connolley_.28talk_.C2.B7_contribs_.C2.B7_logs_.C2.B7_block_user_.C2.B7_block_log.29][[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 12:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
6710 +++$+++ BozMo +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6706 +++$+++ 6708 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.175716200E09 +++$+++ Well Martin Juckes whom you mentioned and deleted from the article is an old friend of mine too, and I don't much like McIntre personally... Seriously though I am not worried about other people's opinions. I suggest you don't make it all about climate change (and even refer to this kind of thing: [http:\/\/www1.umn.edu\/ships\/ethics\/millikan.htm] ) but I only have one vote at the end of the day. -- +++$+++ :::Well Martin Juckes whom you mentioned and deleted from the article is an old friend of mine too, and I don't much like McIntre personally... Seriously though I am not worried about other people's opinions. I suggest you don't make it all about climate change (and even refer to this kind of thing: [http://www1.umn.edu/ships/ethics/millikan.htm] ) but I only have one vote at the end of the day. --[[User:BozMo|BozMo]] [[user talk:BozMo|talk]] 12:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
6711 +++$+++ BozMo +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6706 +++$+++ 6708 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.175716380E09 +++$+++ Incidentally you shouldn't be surprised at my being reasonable. People tend to act how you treat them (as I know as a parent). Even WMC becomes very reasonable if approached with that expectation...-- +++$+++ :::Incidentally you shouldn't be surprised at my being reasonable. People tend to act how you treat them (as I know as a parent). Even WMC becomes very reasonable if approached with that expectation...--[[User:BozMo|BozMo]] [[user talk:BozMo|talk]] 12:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
6712 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6706 +++$+++ 6711 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.175717640E09 +++$+++ I have worked with William when he was reasonable.  William devotes a huge amount of time to Wikipedia and provides a very valuable service much of the time.  But I have also seen him completely unreasonable as he is whenever Mann is criticized and it really has nothing to do with how I treat him.  I am very even tempered and get along with everyone in real life.  I thought the Martin Juckes incident was interesting and I can see why McIntyre was particular pissed off at him, but I removed it because it was not really notable.  I do not want the article to be all about climate change and have gone out of my way to make certain it is not.  Readers need to see the issue in the larger context.  Thank you for the interesting link.  The issue of \"data selection\" is very similar to \"data withholding\" in the sense that not all of the data is being made available.  But it seems that data selection can be an even greater crime against science.  If a doctor conducts a study with 35 cancer patients and 25 die from the experimental treatment and 10 survive it and are cured, can the doctor claim to have cured 10 out of 10 patients?  Of course not. For this reason, I view data selection as a fraud and data withholding as pseudoscience.  Do you think I'm wrong? +++$+++ ::::I have worked with William when he was reasonable.  William devotes a huge amount of time to Wikipedia and provides a very valuable service much of the time.  But I have also seen him completely unreasonable as he is whenever Mann is criticized and it really has nothing to do with how I treat him.  I am very even tempered and get along with everyone in real life.  I thought the Martin Juckes incident was interesting and I can see why McIntyre was particular pissed off at him, but I removed it because it was not really notable.  I do not want the article to be all about climate change and have gone out of my way to make certain it is not.  Readers need to see the issue in the larger context.  Thank you for the interesting link.  The issue of "data selection" is very similar to "data withholding" in the sense that not all of the data is being made available.  But it seems that data selection can be an even greater crime against science.  If a doctor conducts a study with 35 cancer patients and 25 die from the experimental treatment and 10 survive it and are cured, can the doctor claim to have cured 10 out of 10 patients?  Of course not. For this reason, I view data selection as a fraud and data withholding as pseudoscience.  Do you think I'm wrong?[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 13:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
6713 +++$+++ BozMo +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6706 +++$+++ 6712 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.175719800E09 +++$+++ Data selection can be fraud (but its widespread especially from publication bias) I honestly don't know what pseudoscience means. I think that it should be a clear requirement of peer reviewed scientific publications that the data is auditable by third parties. But ... I have published analysis papers such as [http:\/\/cat.inist.fr\/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=4973646] where the data was only made available (by Det Norske Veritas) to people who funded a project on an \"own use\" basis. At least there were other parties involved to check but it made me unhappy. Popper would probably say you are right: it makes results unfalsifiable. Kuhn I am not so sure. -- +++$+++ :::::Data selection can be fraud (but its widespread especially from publication bias) I honestly don't know what pseudoscience means. I think that it should be a clear requirement of peer reviewed scientific publications that the data is auditable by third parties. But ... I have published analysis papers such as [http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=4973646] where the data was only made available (by Det Norske Veritas) to people who funded a project on an "own use" basis. At least there were other parties involved to check but it made me unhappy. Popper would probably say you are right: it makes results unfalsifiable. Kuhn I am not so sure. --[[User:BozMo|BozMo]] [[user talk:BozMo|talk]] 13:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
6714 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6706 +++$+++ 6707 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.175724060E09 +++$+++ Ron you shouldn't put too much faith in your 20.000 results - if you use Google in a little more creative way - you'd find that only 154 pages are referring to \"data withholding\" outside the context of medicine\/genetics and inside the context of science [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=academic+OR+science+OR+scientist+OR+scientists+%22data+withholding+%22+-genetics+-genetic+-medicine+-genome+-hospital+-medical+-site%3Awikipedia.org+-site%3Aclimateaudit.org+-site%3Arealclimate.org] - could it be that you have the focus on a wrong subject? (oh and btw. if you add \"pseudoscience\" then we drop to 2 results). Try fiddling a bit with Google and determine just how large a subject this is - and why the focus in the article should be ''almost entirely'' on medicine and genetics. -- +++$+++ ::Ron you shouldn't put too much faith in your 20.000 results - if you use Google in a little more creative way - you'd find that only 154 pages are referring to "data withholding" outside the context of medicine/genetics and inside the context of science [http://www.google.com/search?q=academic+OR+science+OR+scientist+OR+scientists+%22data+withholding+%22+-genetics+-genetic+-medicine+-genome+-hospital+-medical+-site%3Awikipedia.org+-site%3Aclimateaudit.org+-site%3Arealclimate.org] - could it be that you have the focus on a wrong subject? (oh and btw. if you add "pseudoscience" then we drop to 2 results). Try fiddling a bit with Google and determine just how large a subject this is - and why the focus in the article should be ''almost entirely'' on medicine and genetics. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] 15:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

530997 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-03 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.270284240E09 +++$+++ There's another [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500|article]] similar to [[2010 Food City 500]] that I would like you to look at the grammer and spelling when you have time. Hopefully after I finish the article it can be a [[WP:GA|Good Article]] nominee. --''' +++$+++ There's another [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500|article]] similar to [[2010 Food City 500]] that I would like you to look at the grammer and spelling when you have time. Hopefully after I finish the article it can be a [[WP:GA|Good Article]] nominee. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 01:44, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
530998 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530997 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-03 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.270326780E09 +++$+++ Would this [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/bristolmotorspeedway\/4455411666\/ one] work on the article? --''' +++$+++ ::Would this [http://www.flickr.com/photos/bristolmotorspeedway/4455411666/ one] work on the article? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 13:33, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
530999 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530997 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-05 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.270521360E09 +++$+++ If the table on [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500]] was finished what rating would you give it? --''' +++$+++ :::If the table on [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500]] was finished what rating would you give it? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 19:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
531000 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530997 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-08 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.270718580E09 +++$+++ [[2010 Food City 500|It]] passed! Thank You for all of your help to make this article a GOOD ARTICLE. Now I will try to get [[2010 Kobalt Tools 500]] or [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500]] to that level. Cheers! --''' +++$+++ ::::[[2010 Food City 500|It]] passed! Thank You for all of your help to make this article a GOOD ARTICLE. Now I will try to get [[2010 Kobalt Tools 500]] or [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500]] to that level. Cheers! --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 02:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
531001 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530997 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-08 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.270723620E09 +++$+++ You're welcome and congrats! Let me know if you want a peer review before nominating any of these articles. Please request it in a new section on my talk page. I'm shocked that you were able to get a review so fast - I've always had to wait at least a month. GREAT JOB! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::You're welcome and congrats! Let me know if you want a peer review before nominating any of these articles. Please request it in a new section on my talk page. I'm shocked that you were able to get a review so fast - I've always had to wait at least a month. GREAT JOB! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:47, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
531002 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 530997 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-08 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.270793220E09 +++$+++ Okay, if I request for your help it will be in a new section. --''' +++$+++ ::::::Okay, if I request for your help it will be in a new section. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 23:07, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

268858 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268858 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-24 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.227596880E09 +++$+++ I asked you a question [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates&diff=253884887&oldid=253884058 here]. Hope you don't mind... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ I asked you a question [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates&diff=253884887&oldid=253884058 here]. Hope you don't mind... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 23:08, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
268859 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268858 +++$+++ 268858 +++$+++ 2008-11-24 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.227597060E09 +++$+++ I don't mind. Actually, I have been trying to find your question, using search \"Ling.Nut\".  &mdash; +++$+++ :I don't mind. Actually, I have been trying to find your question, using search "Ling.Nut".  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:11, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
268860 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268858 +++$+++ 268859 +++$+++ 2008-11-24 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.227597240E09 +++$+++ I linked to it, above... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ ::I linked to it, above... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 23:14, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

531003 +++$+++ Smallbones +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531003 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-25 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.269517020E09 +++$+++ Nice work on Outagamie County!  congrats.   +++$+++ Nice work on Outagamie County!  congrats.  [[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]] ([[User talk:Smallbones|talk]]) 04:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
531004 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531003 +++$+++ 531003 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.269517440E09 +++$+++ Thanks! It was a great day, I got to learn how to use a GPS which helped immensely, and I was fortunate to find [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Outagamie County, Wisconsin|everything]]! I've tried many other counties just to find that 1 or 2 were demolished, that the description was too vague, or that the addressing system had changed. I was lucky to find the 2 images in Greenville considering their addressing had changed. Fortunately there was a real faint paint traces for the former state bank and I could figure out a hotel\/saloon a few houses away. It felt good to succeed after numerous close calls. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thanks! It was a great day, I got to learn how to use a GPS which helped immensely, and I was fortunate to find [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Outagamie County, Wisconsin|everything]]! I've tried many other counties just to find that 1 or 2 were demolished, that the description was too vague, or that the addressing system had changed. I was lucky to find the 2 images in Greenville considering their addressing had changed. Fortunately there was a real faint paint traces for the former state bank and I could figure out a hotel/saloon a few houses away. It felt good to succeed after numerous close calls. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

6716 +++$+++ Mnyakko +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6716 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-04 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.175725800E09 +++$+++ Just FYI.   --   +++$+++ Just FYI.   --  [[User:Mnyakko|Tony]] 15:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
6717 +++$+++ BozMo +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6716 +++$+++ 6716 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.175728620E09 +++$+++ No Tony, I put the canvas tag up first time around. WMC was correct in maintaining it (although looking at the above comments about mountains and molehills come to mind) -- +++$+++ :No Tony, I put the canvas tag up first time around. WMC was correct in maintaining it (although looking at the above comments about mountains and molehills come to mind) --[[User:BozMo|BozMo]] [[user talk:BozMo|talk]] 16:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
6718 +++$+++ Mnyakko +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6716 +++$+++ 6717 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.175747700E09 +++$+++ I stand corrected...the origination of the tag was from BozMo.  It still stands that WMC reverted what would have balanced an unnecessary in the header by providing an applicable exception that could apply.  It fascinates me the level of double-standards held by BozMo, WMC, et al.  Tell the admin how to canvass but assume the admin already knows of exceptions that are allowed...blogs are reliable sources for one POV and even news services are \"hopelessly biased\" if it is not in <s>goosestep<\/s> lock-step with the POV of the Global Warming owners.  I would fully expect to play poker with that cast of characters and have them say their had with 3 hearts and 2 spades is a full house but everyone else's 3 Kings and 2 Queens is only a three of a kind.  That is how ridiculous the double-standards by the GW owners are.  --   +++$+++ ::I stand corrected...the origination of the tag was from BozMo.  It still stands that WMC reverted what would have balanced an unnecessary in the header by providing an applicable exception that could apply.  It fascinates me the level of double-standards held by BozMo, WMC, et al.  Tell the admin how to canvass but assume the admin already knows of exceptions that are allowed...blogs are reliable sources for one POV and even news services are "hopelessly biased" if it is not in <s>goosestep</s> lock-step with the POV of the Global Warming owners.  I would fully expect to play poker with that cast of characters and have them say their had with 3 hearts and 2 spades is a full house but everyone else's 3 Kings and 2 Queens is only a three of a kind.  That is how ridiculous the double-standards by the GW owners are.  --  [[User:Mnyakko|Tony]] 21:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
6719 +++$+++ BozMo +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6716 +++$+++ 6718 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.175797140E09 +++$+++ I certainly would never agree to play poker with you ;) -- +++$+++ ::: I certainly would never agree to play poker with you ;) --[[User:BozMo|BozMo]] [[user talk:BozMo|talk]] 11:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

268861 +++$+++ Bejnar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268861 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-25 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.227624000E09 +++$+++ I didn't find any references to this.  Could this be a confusion with the building of the Rath Yatra chariots at the temples?  Could you provide a citation of this usage? Thanks. -- +++$+++ I didn't find any references to this.  Could this be a confusion with the building of the Rath Yatra chariots at the temples?  Could you provide a citation of this usage? Thanks. --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar|talk]]) 06:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
268862 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268861 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-25 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.227658320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for contacting me. That is very considerate of you! December 2007 was a year ago, following a period when I had been writing many   articles on India, Indian architecture,  Indian temples etc. I think I know what temple complex is meant in that reference.  I would not have added a red link to a dismbig page, so apparently the article or section I linked there has been deleted or merged. I would have to get up to speed and go through my Indian books to clearly resolve the issue.  So I would recommend just deleting it, as I no longer create, maintain, or follow-up any  articles on India, including my own.  Thanks!  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Thanks for contacting me. That is very considerate of you! December 2007 was a year ago, following a period when I had been writing many   articles on India, Indian architecture,  Indian temples etc. I think I know what temple complex is meant in that reference.  I would not have added a red link to a dismbig page, so apparently the article or section I linked there has been deleted or merged. I would have to get up to speed and go through my Indian books to clearly resolve the issue.  So I would recommend just deleting it, as I no longer create, maintain, or follow-up any  articles on India, including my own.  Thanks!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:12, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
268863 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268861 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-25 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.227659340E09 +++$+++ From looking at the disambig page further, it looks like the articles referring to the use of the term in India have been deleted, as those red links used to to to articles. I would recommend just deleting those links. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::From looking at the disambig page further, it looks like the articles referring to the use of the term in India have been deleted, as those red links used to to to articles. I would recommend just deleting those links. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

531007 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531007 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-01 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.270116600E09 +++$+++ Would you be willing to archive the four main pages for today again? Thanks.  +++$+++ Would you be willing to archive the four main pages for today again? Thanks. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 03:10, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
531008 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531007 +++$+++ 531007 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.270116780E09 +++$+++ You're talking about the April Fool's queues for the archives. I should be able archive the 1st, 2nd, and 4th, but not the 3rd. I'll be at work the entire time that queue is active. I'm hoping that others will be willing to do some or all of these. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :You're talking about the April Fool's queues for the archives. I should be able archive the 1st, 2nd, and 4th, but not the 3rd. I'll be at work the entire time that queue is active. I'm hoping that others will be willing to do some or all of these. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

6720 +++$+++ Childhoodsend +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-20 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.177100640E09 +++$+++ Regards -- +++$+++ Regards --[[User:Childhoodsend|Childhood&#39;s End]] 13:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
6721 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6720 +++$+++ 6720 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.177103040E09 +++$+++ Thank you. It was a good read.  +++$+++ :Thank you. It was a good read. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 14:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

268865 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-27 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.227789720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for supporting the article and the kind words, but something inside me says to have your vote withdrawn from the decision. Mainly because you performed that giant copyedit. I believe that with all the edits you did to the article, that your vote doesn't seem to count. You have done the second top most edits to the article. I believe there is a rule against that. You have significantly contributed to the article, and for some reason (I guess wanting to follow the rules) I don't think your vote should be accepted. Nothing against you, it just doesn't seem right to me. I could be wrong, but I just thought to tell you that.-- +++$+++ Thanks for supporting the article and the kind words, but something inside me says to have your vote withdrawn from the decision. Mainly because you performed that giant copyedit. I believe that with all the edits you did to the article, that your vote doesn't seem to count. You have done the second top most edits to the article. I believe there is a rule against that. You have significantly contributed to the article, and for some reason (I guess wanting to follow the rules) I don't think your vote should be accepted. Nothing against you, it just doesn't seem right to me. I could be wrong, but I just thought to tell you that.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 04:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
268866 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.227790080E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your concern. I will disclose that I was a major copy editor in my support. Would that be alright?  I do not want you to feel my support is less than sincere, nor that it does not refliect my admiration for the article. My work was just clean up copy editing, having nothing to do with content. May articles are heavily edited by copy editors, so that is not unusual.     Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you for your concern. I will disclose that I was a major copy editor in my support. Would that be alright?  I do not want you to feel my support is less than sincere, nor that it does not refliect my admiration for the article. My work was just clean up copy editing, having nothing to do with content. May articles are heavily edited by copy editors, so that is not unusual.     Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:48, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
268867 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ 268866 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.227790380E09 +++$+++ Your decision. If you want to state that in the FAC then go ahead. I'm really speechless for some reason. I don't really have anything to say. If you knew me in real life, then you would understand that is strange.-- +++$+++ ::Your decision. If you want to state that in the FAC then go ahead. I'm really speechless for some reason. I don't really have anything to say. If you knew me in real life, then you would understand that is strange.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 04:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
268868 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ 268867 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.227790920E09 +++$+++ I believe the article deserves to be supported. I do not readily support articles, and certainly not because I have copy edited them. If the article truly  does not deserve a support, I believe opposes will follow. That is what usually happens with a misapplied support.  Please accept my vote as genuine. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::I believe the article deserves to be supported. I do not readily support articles, and certainly not because I have copy edited them. If the article truly  does not deserve a support, I believe opposes will follow. That is what usually happens with a misapplied support.  Please accept my vote as genuine. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 05:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
268869 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ 268868 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.227792180E09 +++$+++ Okay, and thanks. The first article I ever wrote, first I took to GAN, my first GA, the first I took to FAC, and could be my first FA. I just guess I want to make sure it passes because it deserves to pass. Thanks for the support and for the copyedit.-- +++$+++ ::::Okay, and thanks. The first article I ever wrote, first I took to GAN, my first GA, the first I took to FAC, and could be my first FA. I just guess I want to make sure it passes because it deserves to pass. Thanks for the support and for the copyedit.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 05:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
268870 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.228181160E09 +++$+++ A curiously one-sided observation.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ABuckingham_Palace&diff=255233279&oldid=255232636] -- +++$+++ :A curiously one-sided observation.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABuckingham_Palace&diff=255233279&oldid=255232636] --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 17:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
268871 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ 268867 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.228184220E09 +++$+++ It's a pity that you seem to find it difficult to be even-handed in your criticism, or even recognise the need for it. I see no warning on Giano's page for his personal attack on Mattisse, for instance. Or is it your view that two wrongs make a right? -- +++$+++ :::It's a pity that you seem to find it difficult to be even-handed in your criticism, or even recognise the need for it. I see no warning on Giano's page for his personal attack on Mattisse, for instance. Or is it your view that two wrongs make a right? --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 18:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
268872 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ 268871 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.228185540E09 +++$+++ [[User:Giano II|Giano]] actually blanked most of [[Buckingham Palace]][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Buckingham_Palace&diff=241613380&oldid=241435694] to \"prove\" something to me, as he said on the talk page[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Buckingham_Palace&diff=241614533&oldid=241596261] in response to a comment I made about references. [[User:Risker]] had to revert the article[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Buckingham_Palace&diff=next&oldid=241613380] with the suggestion on the talk page that Giano allow others to edit the article to prevent charges of [[WP:OWN]].[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Buckingham_Palace&diff=241616357&oldid=241614533] &mdash; +++$+++ ::::[[User:Giano II|Giano]] actually blanked most of [[Buckingham Palace]][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buckingham_Palace&diff=241613380&oldid=241435694] to "prove" something to me, as he said on the talk page[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Buckingham_Palace&diff=241614533&oldid=241596261] in response to a comment I made about references. [[User:Risker]] had to revert the article[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buckingham_Palace&diff=next&oldid=241613380] with the suggestion on the talk page that Giano allow others to edit the article to prevent charges of [[WP:OWN]].[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Buckingham_Palace&diff=241616357&oldid=241614533] &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
268873 +++$+++ Giano II +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ 268867 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.228185720E09 +++$+++ Here you are then Matisse, a major contributor to the page like yourself should have the last say [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Buckingham_Palace#New_lead_image].  +++$+++ :::Here you are then Matisse, a major contributor to the page like yourself should have the last say [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Buckingham_Palace#New_lead_image]. [[User:Giano II|Giano]] ([[User talk:Giano II|talk]]) 18:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
268874 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ 268872 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.228186020E09 +++$+++ Giano's ownership of these kinds of articles is legendary. He though, unlike you or I, is immune from administrator warnings or blocks. -- +++$+++ :::::Giano's ownership of these kinds of articles is legendary. He though, unlike you or I, is immune from administrator warnings or blocks. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 18:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
268875 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268865 +++$+++ 268874 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.228186200E09 +++$+++ I have noticed.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::I have noticed.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

6724 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-16 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.179302580E09 +++$+++ RonCram, I have closed the COI discussion you initiated on William M. Connolley because it was evident that the discussion would not lead to a consensus behind your position; indeed, everyone who commented there disagreed with you, and several people, including myself, felt that you were editing disruptively to make a point. In the event that you disagree with this closure, I suggest that you post at [[WP:ANI]] for a review of my action; on the other hand, if you want to persist in raising your concerns about William M. Connolley's editing, I suggest you open a user conduct RfC ([[WP:RFC\/USER]]). Discussion about the content of [[Hockey stick controversy]] belongs at that article's talk page, of course.  +++$+++ RonCram, I have closed the COI discussion you initiated on William M. Connolley because it was evident that the discussion would not lead to a consensus behind your position; indeed, everyone who commented there disagreed with you, and several people, including myself, felt that you were editing disruptively to make a point. In the event that you disagree with this closure, I suggest that you post at [[WP:ANI]] for a review of my action; on the other hand, if you want to persist in raising your concerns about William M. Connolley's editing, I suggest you open a user conduct RfC ([[WP:RFC/USER]]). Discussion about the content of [[Hockey stick controversy]] belongs at that article's talk page, of course. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 01:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
6725 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6724 +++$+++ 6724 +++$+++ 2007-05-16 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.179303840E09 +++$+++ You closed the discussion too early. This was a classic open and shut case as it was Connolley's second offence. All of Connolley's friends showed up but the editors who supported me last time did not even learn of the COIN posting yet. Even Durova did not get a chance to comment before you closed it.  Regarding [[WP:ANI]], I do not know the process and frankfully doubt it would be worth learning.  Larry Sanger has called Wikipedia \"an often dysfunctional community\" with good reason.   As I understand it, COIN is not a consensus process.  The purpose is to remind people of the rules so they do not continue to violate them. Closing the case without reminding Connolley that he is subject to the same guidelines as everyone else seems ridiculous to me.  +++$+++ :You closed the discussion too early. This was a classic open and shut case as it was Connolley's second offence. All of Connolley's friends showed up but the editors who supported me last time did not even learn of the COIN posting yet. Even Durova did not get a chance to comment before you closed it.  Regarding [[WP:ANI]], I do not know the process and frankfully doubt it would be worth learning.  Larry Sanger has called Wikipedia "an often dysfunctional community" with good reason.   As I understand it, COIN is not a consensus process.  The purpose is to remind people of the rules so they do not continue to violate them. Closing the case without reminding Connolley that he is subject to the same guidelines as everyone else seems ridiculous to me. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 01:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
6726 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6724 +++$+++ 6725 +++$+++ 2007-05-16 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.179305640E09 +++$+++ At any rate, please note that I and several other editors in the thread not only considered your allegations baseless, but found them so off the mark as to constitute possible harassment and [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]]. Please refrain from starting such groundless discussions in the future, as they will not be viewed kindly.  +++$+++ ::At any rate, please note that I and several other editors in the thread not only considered your allegations baseless, but found them so off the mark as to constitute possible harassment and [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]]. Please refrain from starting such groundless discussions in the future, as they will not be viewed kindly. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 01:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
6727 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6724 +++$+++ 6726 +++$+++ 2007-05-16 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.179317280E09 +++$+++ The problem is that you closed the discussion when only the pro-AGWers were present.  In parliamentary terms, the community did not have a quorum.  Again, you mention consensus and as I pointed out above, COIN is not a consensus process.  A vote is not taken, the rules are applied.  Or, at least that is the way it is supposed to work.  The COIN notice was not groundless as Durova found in my favor last time.  Your conclusion was baseless.  I think now I will consider [[WP:ANI]].  +++$+++ :::The problem is that you closed the discussion when only the pro-AGWers were present.  In parliamentary terms, the community did not have a quorum.  Again, you mention consensus and as I pointed out above, COIN is not a consensus process.  A vote is not taken, the rules are applied.  Or, at least that is the way it is supposed to work.  The COIN notice was not groundless as Durova found in my favor last time.  Your conclusion was baseless.  I think now I will consider [[WP:ANI]]. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 05:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
6728 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6724 +++$+++ 6727 +++$+++ 2007-05-16 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.179318360E09 +++$+++ If it's not a vote, no \"quorum\" is required. You failed to demonstrate that there was any rule-breaking. And clearly, you don't understand what Durova wrote in the first case, especially the part where she said, \"it is not my opinion that meaningful impropriety exists...\" Feel free to post on ANI.  +++$+++ ::::If it's not a vote, no "quorum" is required. You failed to demonstrate that there was any rule-breaking. And clearly, you don't understand what Durova wrote in the first case, especially the part where she said, "it is not my opinion that meaningful impropriety exists..." Feel free to post on ANI. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 05:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

612790 +++$+++ Pastordavid +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-16 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.184641920E09 +++$+++ Dave, There is what seems to be a reasonable unblock request at [[User talk:67.132.42.130]] (its a school IP, and the kids are gone for the summer.)  However, I wanted to contact you in case there was a resaon for not unblocking that I might be missing.   +++$+++ Dave, There is what seems to be a reasonable unblock request at [[User talk:67.132.42.130]] (its a school IP, and the kids are gone for the summer.)  However, I wanted to contact you in case there was a resaon for not unblocking that I might be missing.  [[User:Pastordavid|Pastordavid]] 20:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
612791 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612790 +++$+++ 612790 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.184648460E09 +++$+++ No problem with unblocking as far as I'm concerned: adding obscenities to articles did the school's name no favours, but stopping the block now it's holiday time seems reasonable. Unfortunately,  Can't sleep, clown will eat me denied the request at 20:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC), while I was out. It might be worth considering allowing account creation while keeping anon editing blocked: I've dropped [[User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me]] a note. ..  +++$+++ :No problem with unblocking as far as I'm concerned: adding obscenities to articles did the school's name no favours, but stopping the block now it's holiday time seems reasonable. Unfortunately,  Can't sleep, clown will eat me denied the request at 20:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC), while I was out. It might be worth considering allowing account creation while keeping anon editing blocked: I've dropped [[User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me]] a note. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

531016 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-02 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.270234620E09 +++$+++ Thank you for awarding me the Teamwork Barnstar. I greatly appreciate it, especially considering how we met under very unfortunate circumstances. I rarely get wound up tight like I was then. I don't understand why [[Halifax Town Hall]] didn't make the cut - it had brilliant hook that should have made sense internationally! The last two years everyone kept telling me that I was \"in charge\" of April Fool's Day DYKs. I just don't have the time to be as involved in Wikipedia like I was because I work full-time now. I see no shortage of articles to work on; I see plenty of topics in real life. Cheers! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ Thank you for awarding me the Teamwork Barnstar. I greatly appreciate it, especially considering how we met under very unfortunate circumstances. I rarely get wound up tight like I was then. I don't understand why [[Halifax Town Hall]] didn't make the cut - it had brilliant hook that should have made sense internationally! The last two years everyone kept telling me that I was "in charge" of April Fool's Day DYKs. I just don't have the time to be as involved in Wikipedia like I was because I work full-time now. I see no shortage of articles to work on; I see plenty of topics in real life. Cheers! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 11:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
531017 +++$+++ Storye book +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531016 +++$+++ 531016 +++$+++ 2010-04-02 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.270236180E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. No worries.-- +++$+++ : You're welcome. No worries.--[[User:Storye book|Storye book]] ([[User talk:Storye book|talk]]) 12:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

6730 +++$+++ William M. Connolley +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-25 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.180152000E09 +++$+++ Ron - I'm interested in your edit comment here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Global_warming_controversy&diff=133497391&oldid=133490712]. Your position is that RC is a sufficiently reliable source that anything it mentions is automatically notable?  +++$+++ Ron - I'm interested in your edit comment here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming_controversy&diff=133497391&oldid=133490712]. Your position is that RC is a sufficiently reliable source that anything it mentions is automatically notable? [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 21:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
6731 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6730 +++$+++ 6730 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.180152300E09 +++$+++ LOL, no, of course not.  RC is a PR website, but the fact they felt the need to respond to it shows that it is notable.  If it was not notable, they could have safely ignored it.  +++$+++ :LOL, no, of course not.  RC is a PR website, but the fact they felt the need to respond to it shows that it is notable.  If it was not notable, they could have safely ignored it. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 21:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

6732 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6732 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-25 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.180153620E09 +++$+++ Hi Ron. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FExposed%3A_The_Climate_of_Fear&diff=133498462&oldid=133497328 Over here] you claimed that April was the coolest April in 46 years. Do you have any source for that? The number suggests that it comes from [http:\/\/www.ncdc.noaa.gov\/oa\/climate\/research\/cag3\/na.html here], but a) if you read it exactly, this is saying something very different and b) it is talking about US temperatures only. Over here it was extremely warm and dry. See e.g. [http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/2007\/04\/30\/news\/0430weather.php here]. In central England, is was the warmest April and the warmest 12 months period since temperature recording began 350 years ago. I've been suffering from hay fever since February...normally its mid-March. -- +++$+++ Hi Ron. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FExposed%3A_The_Climate_of_Fear&diff=133498462&oldid=133497328 Over here] you claimed that April was the coolest April in 46 years. Do you have any source for that? The number suggests that it comes from [http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/na.html here], but a) if you read it exactly, this is saying something very different and b) it is talking about US temperatures only. Over here it was extremely warm and dry. See e.g. [http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/news/0430weather.php here]. In central England, is was the warmest April and the warmest 12 months period since temperature recording began 350 years ago. I've been suffering from hay fever since February...normally its mid-March. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 21:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
6733 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6732 +++$+++ 6732 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.180154220E09 +++$+++ With the proviso that monthly temperature anomalies aren't especially meaningful -- according to the CRU data, April 2007 was the third-warmest April in the instrumental record[http:\/\/www.cru.uea.ac.uk\/cru\/data\/temperature\/crutem3gl.txt].  +++$+++ :With the proviso that monthly temperature anomalies aren't especially meaningful -- according to the CRU data, April 2007 was the third-warmest April in the instrumental record[http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/crutem3gl.txt]. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] 21:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
6734 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6732 +++$+++ 6733 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.180154520E09 +++$+++ Wow.  It appears you are correct.  I thought I was reading global temperature anomalies.  May is also cooler than usual here in Southern Cal, about five degrees cooler than normal.  It has been this way for two weeks.  +++$+++ ::Wow.  It appears you are correct.  I thought I was reading global temperature anomalies.  May is also cooler than usual here in Southern Cal, about five degrees cooler than normal.  It has been this way for two weeks. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 21:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
6735 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6732 +++$+++ 6734 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.180155240E09 +++$+++ Hi Ron, now you write \"The stat I was referring to relates to North American temperature anomalies and I thought it was referring to global temp. \" If you rely on data from [http:\/\/www.ncdc.noaa.gov\/oa\/climate\/research\/cag3\/na.html NCDC], they say it's the 47th coldest April in the last 113 years (in the US), i.e. slightly colder than the median. It says nothing about the relationship to the preceeding 46 years (unless you sort by temperature, of course).  -- +++$+++ :::Hi Ron, now you write "The stat I was referring to relates to North American temperature anomalies and I thought it was referring to global temp. " If you rely on data from [http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/na.html NCDC], they say it's the 47th coldest April in the last 113 years (in the US), i.e. slightly colder than the median. It says nothing about the relationship to the preceeding 46 years (unless you sort by temperature, of course).  --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 21:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
6736 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6732 +++$+++ 6735 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.180156380E09 +++$+++ I believe I was reading a different web page belonging to GISS.  I do not recall now.  +++$+++ ::::I believe I was reading a different web page belonging to GISS.  I do not recall now. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 22:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

531021 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-05 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.270526040E09 +++$+++ My computer went down for a week some virus-I was do for a Wikibreak although it was involuntary. I like this years April Fools Day- Many thanks- +++$+++ My computer went down for a week some virus-I was do for a Wikibreak although it was involuntary. I like this years April Fools Day- Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 20:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
531022 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531021 +++$+++ 531021 +++$+++ 2010-04-08 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.270718220E09 +++$+++ I wasn't as involved with April Fool's this year but I did a fair bit. I'm glad to see that you're back. I just reformat my hard drive when they pop up instead of dealing with a nasty one. It's good to periodically redo everything to clean out all the junk that Windows does to your computer anyhow. Did you see that I made my 100th DYK and it was [[Norm Nelson]] from Racine in a triple hook? Thinks have been rolling here - I'm especially excited to see racing season starting with a preseason special at Seymour this Saturday. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I wasn't as involved with April Fool's this year but I did a fair bit. I'm glad to see that you're back. I just reformat my hard drive when they pop up instead of dealing with a nasty one. It's good to periodically redo everything to clean out all the junk that Windows does to your computer anyhow. Did you see that I made my 100th DYK and it was [[Norm Nelson]] from Racine in a triple hook? Thinks have been rolling here - I'm especially excited to see racing season starting with a preseason special at Seymour this Saturday. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:17, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

531023 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-09 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.270797360E09 +++$+++ When ever your up to a challlenge I would like you to make a peer review on the article [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500]]. I think the only problem is with the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/2010_Goody%27s_Fast_Pain_Relief_500#Race_summary Race Summary] section. Thanks. --''' +++$+++ When ever your up to a challlenge I would like you to make a peer review on the article [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500]]. I think the only problem is with the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Goody%27s_Fast_Pain_Relief_500#Race_summary Race Summary] section. Thanks. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 00:16, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
531024 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531023 +++$+++ 531023 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.270851300E09 +++$+++ Thank You for starting the peer review of the [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500|article]]. Soon the article will be able to be nominated for  [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article status]] --''' +++$+++ :Thank You for starting the peer review of the [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500|article]]. Soon the article will be able to be nominated for  [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article status]] --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 15:15, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
531025 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531023 +++$+++ 531024 +++$+++ 2010-04-10 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.270938120E09 +++$+++ I have finished your first peer review. --''' +++$+++ ::I have finished your first peer review. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 15:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
531026 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531023 +++$+++ 531025 +++$+++ 2010-04-10 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.270961100E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I haven't had time for it yet. I really needed to check my watchlist this morning - I couldn't leave it be for three days. There was some vandalism too. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Sorry, I haven't had time for it yet. I really needed to check my watchlist this morning - I couldn't leave it be for three days. There was some vandalism too. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 21:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
531027 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531023 +++$+++ 531026 +++$+++ 2010-04-10 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.270966200E09 +++$+++ Okay do you believe I should nominate the [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500|article]] now? --''' +++$+++ ::::Okay do you believe I should nominate the [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500|article]] now? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 23:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
531028 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531023 +++$+++ 531027 +++$+++ 2010-04-10 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.270969140E09 +++$+++ I saw the beginning of tonight's race. They announced the color guard and who performed the national anthem. For future reference, you can use the race coverage as a reliable source. The template to use for citing it is {{tl|Cite episode}}. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::I saw the beginning of tonight's race. They announced the color guard and who performed the national anthem. For future reference, you can use the race coverage as a reliable source. The template to use for citing it is {{tl|Cite episode}}. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:59, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
531029 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531023 +++$+++ 531028 +++$+++ 2010-04-11 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.270971960E09 +++$+++ Thanks that seems like it will help me big time. I will also nominate it. --''' +++$+++ ::::::Thanks that seems like it will help me big time. I will also nominate it. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 00:46, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

6737 +++$+++ Oren0 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-09 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.181439600E09 +++$+++ Your links do raise a few interesting points.  But it seems to me that they're graphs of different things.  The first one peaks at 55F in '35 and '98.  The second one peaks at around 48F.  I don't know enough about where these graphs come from to know why the axes are so different.  Furthermore, even if you and I were to believe that this record was somehow tampered with, you've been around WP long enough to know that we'd need [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that say so, otherwise any mention of it is [[WP:OR]].  If you're able to find such evidence, I will work alongside you to get this info on [[global warming controversy]] and on [[temperature record]].  However, we need sources to do this.  +++$+++ Your links do raise a few interesting points.  But it seems to me that they're graphs of different things.  The first one peaks at 55F in '35 and '98.  The second one peaks at around 48F.  I don't know enough about where these graphs come from to know why the axes are so different.  Furthermore, even if you and I were to believe that this record was somehow tampered with, you've been around WP long enough to know that we'd need [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that say so, otherwise any mention of it is [[WP:OR]].  If you're able to find such evidence, I will work alongside you to get this info on [[global warming controversy]] and on [[temperature record]].  However, we need sources to do this. [[User:Oren0|Oren0]] 18:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
6738 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6737 +++$+++ 6737 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.181459700E09 +++$+++ I agree.  I should have read the titles of the images. One is an annual temp graph and the 2007 only covers Jan through May, the colder months. However, unwarranted adjustments to the temperature record have occurred.  I learned of this on ClimateAudit. See Comment 15 here.[http:\/\/www.climateaudit.org\/?p=1217]  Also, check this out [http:\/\/www.btw-2005.de\/blog\/blogs\/index.php\/2006\/12\/14\/] and this. [http:\/\/www.btw-2005.de\/blog\/blogs\/index.php\/2006\/12\/10\/ratselhaft] Compare the 1930s to the 1990s in the older version of the graph and the newer version.  When GISS was contacted about this, they took those images off of their website.  I thought I had found some similar images that had not been scrubbed, but I did not read the titles.  The other issue of poor quality land surface stations has legs also and this is related to the unwarranted adjustments.  The GISS says some of the adjustments are due to \"rural cooling\" effect (which is really just a way to try to hide the urban heat island effect).  But the problem is these rural sites seem to have their own warming bias due to land use changes and other non-climatic heating factors. I do hope you will help me research this and improve the articles.  +++$+++ :I agree.  I should have read the titles of the images. One is an annual temp graph and the 2007 only covers Jan through May, the colder months. However, unwarranted adjustments to the temperature record have occurred.  I learned of this on ClimateAudit. See Comment 15 here.[http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1217]  Also, check this out [http://www.btw-2005.de/blog/blogs/index.php/2006/12/14/] and this. [http://www.btw-2005.de/blog/blogs/index.php/2006/12/10/ratselhaft] Compare the 1930s to the 1990s in the older version of the graph and the newer version.  When GISS was contacted about this, they took those images off of their website.  I thought I had found some similar images that had not been scrubbed, but I did not read the titles.  The other issue of poor quality land surface stations has legs also and this is related to the unwarranted adjustments.  The GISS says some of the adjustments are due to "rural cooling" effect (which is really just a way to try to hide the urban heat island effect).  But the problem is these rural sites seem to have their own warming bias due to land use changes and other non-climatic heating factors. I do hope you will help me research this and improve the articles. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 00:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

268882 +++$+++ Dweller +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268882 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-02 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.228247100E09 +++$+++ Incisive questions. I think it would be fair to the candidate and helpful to others reading, if you could illustrate your first question with a specific diff or diffs. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Incisive questions. I think it would be fair to the candidate and helpful to others reading, if you could illustrate your first question with a specific diff or diffs. Thanks. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 11:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
268883 +++$+++ Dweller +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268882 +++$+++ 268882 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.228247280E09 +++$+++ I saw your comment above about negativity, etc. Even if its title is inaccurate for you, can I humbly recommend my essay: [[User:Dweller\/Suggestions for wikistressed editors]] -- +++$+++ :I saw your comment above about negativity, etc. Even if its title is inaccurate for you, can I humbly recommend my essay: [[User:Dweller/Suggestions for wikistressed editors]] --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 11:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
268884 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268882 +++$+++ 268883 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.228273920E09 +++$+++ I added some diffs in response to your request. However, since [[User:Risker|Risker]] did not answer my questions posted his\/her talk page, I do not expect them to be answered now. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::I added some diffs in response to your request. However, since [[User:Risker|Risker]] did not answer my questions posted his/her talk page, I do not expect them to be answered now. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:12, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

263267 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-09 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.128887040E09 +++$+++ I've only just noticed that you're at the University of Sunderland.  I was short-listed for a job there some years ago (I came second...), and wondered how you're finding it.  I quite liked the city from what I saw of it, and I've always had a weakness for the North-East anyway. -- +++$+++ I've only just noticed that you're at the University of Sunderland.  I was short-listed for a job there some years ago (I came second...), and wondered how you're finding it.  I quite liked the city from what I saw of it, and I've always had a weakness for the North-East anyway. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>)]] 12:44, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
263268 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263267 +++$+++ 263267 +++$+++ 2005-10-18 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.129678740E09 +++$+++ Hello. There is an enormous amount of controversy about the authorship of Quint's monologue. Several people (including Spielberg, Sackler, and, significantly, Shaw) wrote drafts, and the final result is a combined effort. It is inaccurate and unfair to attribute authorship soley to Milius. Accounts vary between different sources, so it is certianly not up to us to make some sort of judgement about what happened thirty years ago in Martha's Vineyard. \"Contributed\" is a neutral, fair way of expressing his, erm, contribution.  +++$+++ :Hello. There is an enormous amount of controversy about the authorship of Quint's monologue. Several people (including Spielberg, Sackler, and, significantly, Shaw) wrote drafts, and the final result is a combined effort. It is inaccurate and unfair to attribute authorship soley to Milius. Accounts vary between different sources, so it is certianly not up to us to make some sort of judgement about what happened thirty years ago in Martha's Vineyard. "Contributed" is a neutral, fair way of expressing his, erm, contribution. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 16:39, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

6741 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-25 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.182800700E09 +++$+++ I'll answer the substance over there when I find a bit more time. But do you know that one major part of peer review is to ''reject'' bad papers?  At least in my field, beween 50% and over 90% of papers (depending on the venue) are rejected (and that is ''after'' editors\/program chairs weed out obvious crap and cranks). That is why I won't consider any system where the author has final say over the publication as (scientific) peer review. Peer review is both adversial (the reviewer is looking for flaws) and cooperative (if he consider the paper to be basically sound and valuable, ''then'' he or she may suggest how to improve it). -- +++$+++ I'll answer the substance over there when I find a bit more time. But do you know that one major part of peer review is to ''reject'' bad papers?  At least in my field, beween 50% and over 90% of papers (depending on the venue) are rejected (and that is ''after'' editors/program chairs weed out obvious crap and cranks). That is why I won't consider any system where the author has final say over the publication as (scientific) peer review. Peer review is both adversial (the reviewer is looking for flaws) and cooperative (if he consider the paper to be basically sound and valuable, ''then'' he or she may suggest how to improve it). --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 12:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
6742 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6741 +++$+++ 6741 +++$+++ 2007-06-25 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.182802800E09 +++$+++ Stephan, congrats on your wins! Yes, of course I know that reviewers can advise not to publish.  Editors make a decision based on this advice.  What makes you think that is not also true of the open review system?  +++$+++ :Stephan, congrats on your wins! Yes, of course I know that reviewers can advise not to publish.  Editors make a decision based on this advice.  What makes you think that is not also true of the open review system? [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 13:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
6743 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6741 +++$+++ 6742 +++$+++ 2007-06-25 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.182805800E09 +++$+++ From http:\/\/www.forecastingprinciples.com\/Public_Policy\/global_warming_audit.html: \"Scott Armstrong ''will'' present the Armstrong and Green paper at a keynote session at the International Symposium on Forecasting on Wednesday June 27 at 11:45 in the Olmstead Room of the Marriott Hotel on Times Square.[...] Peer review and independent audits ''are'' welcome.\" (emphasis mine), which to me very much indicates that the paper will be presented, regardless of the outcome of the ongoing peer review\/audit. From the website it is entirely unclear if the paper has any invited reviewers, and who is handling the editorial process. -- +++$+++ ::From http://www.forecastingprinciples.com/Public_Policy/global_warming_audit.html: "Scott Armstrong ''will'' present the Armstrong and Green paper at a keynote session at the International Symposium on Forecasting on Wednesday June 27 at 11:45 in the Olmstead Room of the Marriott Hotel on Times Square.[...] Peer review and independent audits ''are'' welcome." (emphasis mine), which to me very much indicates that the paper will be presented, regardless of the outcome of the ongoing peer review/audit. From the website it is entirely unclear if the paper has any invited reviewers, and who is handling the editorial process. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 14:10, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
6744 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6741 +++$+++ 6743 +++$+++ 2007-06-25 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.182807900E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that is pretty common.  Papers are presented and comments invited, but the presentation is not the same as publication.  Although, based on Armstrong's reputation and contribution to scientific forecasting, I think the likelihood of publication is somewhere close to 99.7% +\/- 0.005%.  How's that for a scientific forecast? :)  If you put in enough signficant figs, someone will be convinced! Truly though, I do think it will be published (with some minor changes).  This does kind of limit the journals it will be published in, either IJF or Foresight.  Both are published by IIF.  +++$+++ :::Yeah, that is pretty common.  Papers are presented and comments invited, but the presentation is not the same as publication.  Although, based on Armstrong's reputation and contribution to scientific forecasting, I think the likelihood of publication is somewhere close to 99.7% +/- 0.005%.  How's that for a scientific forecast? :)  If you put in enough signficant figs, someone will be convinced! Truly though, I do think it will be published (with some minor changes).  This does kind of limit the journals it will be published in, either IJF or Foresight.  Both are published by IIF. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 14:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

531030 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-13 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.271214960E09 +++$+++ Are you finished with the peer review on [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500]] yet? <!-- Warning! This message is not to be pushy.  -->--''' +++$+++ Are you finished with the peer review on [[2010 Goody's Fast Pain Relief 500]] yet? <!-- Warning! This message is not to be pushy.  -->--'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 20:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
531031 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531030 +++$+++ 531030 +++$+++ 2010-04-14 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.271237460E09 +++$+++ No, I'm not done with the review. You didn't finish up the points on the review yet (that's not affecting me, just saying). '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :No, I'm not done with the review. You didn't finish up the points on the review yet (that's not affecting me, just saying). '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:31, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
531032 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531030 +++$+++ 531031 +++$+++ 2010-04-14 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.271240040E09 +++$+++ I'm done with the review now. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I'm done with the review now. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

268888 +++$+++ Marlith +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268888 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-03 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.228307160E09 +++$+++ <\/div> '''<span style=\"background:Blue;color:FireBrick\">&nbsp; +++$+++ </div> '''<span style="background:Blue;color:FireBrick">&nbsp;[[User:Marlith|<font color="Orange">Marlith</font>]][[User talk:Marlith|<font color="Orange"> (Talk)</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 04:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
268889 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268888 +++$+++ 268888 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.228822500E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Jennavecia\/Notebook&diff=prev&oldid=256724269] A notebook about power and how truth can be distorted by those who \"run things\". (memories are made of this) &mdash; +++$+++ *[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jennavecia/Notebook&diff=prev&oldid=256724269] A notebook about power and how truth can be distorted by those who "run things". (memories are made of this) &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

6745 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.183590660E09 +++$+++ This [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AScientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming&diff=142464090&oldid=142461115 comment] is simply not acceptable, and i've cut it according to [[WP:TALK#Editing_comments]]. While you may have these opinions yourself - you can't just libel people in this way. Your insistant harping on the \"censored\" bit is also getting tiring and has been answered on quite a few occasions. Conspiracy theories etc. are something for other media - not for the article or talk pages here - unless they are '''very''' well documented in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] - these are extraordinary claims - and would require extraordinary sources (as per [[WP:REDFLAG]]). -- +++$+++ This [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AScientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming&diff=142464090&oldid=142461115 comment] is simply not acceptable, and i've cut it according to [[WP:TALK#Editing_comments]]. While you may have these opinions yourself - you can't just libel people in this way. Your insistant harping on the "censored" bit is also getting tiring and has been answered on quite a few occasions. Conspiracy theories etc. are something for other media - not for the article or talk pages here - unless they are '''very''' well documented in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] - these are extraordinary claims - and would require extraordinary sources (as per [[WP:REDFLAG]]). --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] 16:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6746 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6745 +++$+++ 6745 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.183591080E09 +++$+++ Kim, there is no libel involved.  I provided a reliable source, the Dutch science magazine.  Raymond raised the same issue on BLP noticeboard and no one had a problem with my pointing out that Mann did not make this known because I had a reliable source. I am restoring it to the Talk page.  +++$+++ :Kim, there is no libel involved.  I provided a reliable source, the Dutch science magazine.  Raymond raised the same issue on BLP noticeboard and no one had a problem with my pointing out that Mann did not make this known because I had a reliable source. I am restoring it to the Talk page. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 16:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6747 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6745 +++$+++ 6746 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.183594920E09 +++$+++ And that explains calling  scientists \"activists\" and \"pseudoscientists\", making claims about funding etc.? No it doesn't. Thats ''is'' libel. Now please cease this. As for BLP - noone actually agreed with you either - so i have trouble seeing your point. -- +++$+++ ::And that explains calling  scientists "activists" and "pseudoscientists", making claims about funding etc.? No it doesn't. Thats ''is'' libel. Now please cease this. As for BLP - noone actually agreed with you either - so i have trouble seeing your point. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] 17:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6748 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6745 +++$+++ 6746 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.183595940E09 +++$+++ Just to be clear here: the comments about RC and its people is libel (and a direct attack at a contributing editor (WMC)) - the comments on the \"censored\" bit is black helicoptors. Differentiate please. -- +++$+++ ::Just to be clear here: the comments about RC and its people is libel (and a direct attack at a contributing editor (WMC)) - the comments on the "censored" bit is black helicoptors. Differentiate please. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] 17:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6749 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6745 +++$+++ 6748 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.183597380E09 +++$+++ Michael Mann is (libelous comments redacted per [[WP:BLP]]).  My comment is not libelous.  However, my comment was not intended to paint all contributors with exactly the same brush.  Your comment that I should differentiate is well-received.  I do not know about Connolley's archiving or data sharing habits.  In the future, if you think I have misstated the facts, please be more specific - such as you were in these last posts.  That way I can correct posts which should be stated more precisely.  Your comment about black helicopters makes you lose credibility.  I am simply retelling a story from a well recognized and respected popular science magazine.  +++$+++ :::Michael Mann is (libelous comments redacted per [[WP:BLP]]).  My comment is not libelous.  However, my comment was not intended to paint all contributors with exactly the same brush.  Your comment that I should differentiate is well-received.  I do not know about Connolley's archiving or data sharing habits.  In the future, if you think I have misstated the facts, please be more specific - such as you were in these last posts.  That way I can correct posts which should be stated more precisely.  Your comment about black helicopters makes you lose credibility.  I am simply retelling a story from a well recognized and respected popular science magazine. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 18:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6750 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6745 +++$+++ 6749 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.183602480E09 +++$+++ The activist claim may be considered opinion (albeit an absurd one, looking at Mann's research profile and standing). The pseudoscientist claim, on the other hand, is pure derogatory nonsense, supported by not a single reliable source, but only by your personal conjecture, based on a flawed definition of pseudoscience shared by you alone and applied to a gross misrepresentation of the facts. I suggest you take Raymond's comment below to heart. -- +++$+++ ::::The activist claim may be considered opinion (albeit an absurd one, looking at Mann's research profile and standing). The pseudoscientist claim, on the other hand, is pure derogatory nonsense, supported by not a single reliable source, but only by your personal conjecture, based on a flawed definition of pseudoscience shared by you alone and applied to a gross misrepresentation of the facts. I suggest you take Raymond's comment below to heart. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 19:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6751 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6745 +++$+++ 6750 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.183610040E09 +++$+++ Stephan, I think you are aware of the issues around Mann's policy not to archive data and his refusal to provide his data and methods when it is requested.  I believe you are also aware this lack of openness is described as [[Pseudoscience]].  My opinion of Mann is based on these facts and the content of the CENSORED folder. You may disagree but I do not see how you can expect me to hold Mann in high regard.  In my opinion, the majority of informed (non-climate) scientists do not think highly of Mann's actions.  +++$+++ :::::Stephan, I think you are aware of the issues around Mann's policy not to archive data and his refusal to provide his data and methods when it is requested.  I believe you are also aware this lack of openness is described as [[Pseudoscience]].  My opinion of Mann is based on these facts and the content of the CENSORED folder. You may disagree but I do not see how you can expect me to hold Mann in high regard.  In my opinion, the majority of informed (non-climate) scientists do not think highly of Mann's actions. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 21:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

268890 +++$+++  Backslash Forwardslash +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-05 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.228498920E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. Thanks for the second opinion on the [[Save Our Children]] [[Talk:Save Our Children\/GA1|GAN]] page. I was hoping that you could have another look at it so that it can be wrapped up.  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. Thanks for the second opinion on the [[Save Our Children]] [[Talk:Save Our Children/GA1|GAN]] page. I was hoping that you could have another look at it so that it can be wrapped up. [[User:Backslash Forwardslash|\ /]] ([[User_Talk: Backslash Forwardslash|⁂]]) 09:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
268891 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268890 +++$+++ 268890 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.228639140E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you could get others to look at the article. Some of the sources are biased and I just don't want to get involved further. Sorry!  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Perhaps you could get others to look at the article. Some of the sources are biased and I just don't want to get involved further. Sorry!  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

268892 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-06 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.228553040E09 +++$+++ Hello. A [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/User conduct|request for comment on user conduct]] has recently been filed regarding [[User:Gavin.collins|Gavin.collins]]. Since you had endorsed at least one summary in the prior Request for Comment, I thought that you would want to know. You can see the RFC\/U [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Gavin.collins 2|here]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ Hello. A [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct|request for comment on user conduct]] has recently been filed regarding [[User:Gavin.collins|Gavin.collins]]. Since you had endorsed at least one summary in the prior Request for Comment, I thought that you would want to know. You can see the RFC/U [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gavin.collins 2|here]]. Thank you. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 00:44, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
268893 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268892 +++$+++ 268892 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.228639260E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I have had no further involvement with that user since the first RFC. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks. I have had no further involvement with that user since the first RFC. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

612794 +++$+++ Abecedare +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-21 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.185002340E09 +++$+++ I wandered to your page from the ID article and was reading your bio (yes, I have too much time at the moment!). Am wondering whether you ''really'' mean to say, \"Irritated by something in the Charles Darwin article which [[wiktionary:jibe|jibed]] with his memory of a library book, ...\". Cheers.  +++$+++ I wandered to your page from the ID article and was reading your bio (yes, I have too much time at the moment!). Am wondering whether you ''really'' mean to say, "Irritated by something in the Charles Darwin article which [[wiktionary:jibe|jibed]] with his memory of a library book, ...". Cheers. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] 00:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
612795 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612794 +++$+++ 612794 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.185025500E09 +++$+++ Um. My dim memory of what it means was probably influenced by the yachting style about turn, will try to think of better term. Ta, ...  +++$+++ :Um. My dim memory of what it means was probably influenced by the yachting style about turn, will try to think of better term. Ta, ... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 06:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
612796 +++$+++ Abecedare +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612794 +++$+++ 612795 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.185028740E09 +++$+++ Yes, surprisingly the metaphorical (?) use of the term jibe doesn't jibe with the nautical use of the term jibe. Cheers.  +++$+++ :: Yes, surprisingly the metaphorical (?) use of the term jibe doesn't jibe with the nautical use of the term jibe. Cheers. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] 07:39, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
612797 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612794 +++$+++ 612796 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.185031260E09 +++$+++ Ta, have just spent far too much time bloating that bio.  Cheers, ..  +++$+++ :::Ta, have just spent far too much time bloating that bio.  Cheers, .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 08:21, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

268894 +++$+++ ThuranX +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-06 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.228634820E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your comment at hte AN\/I report I opened on OR; but ignoring the situation by a widening pool of editors results in a wider berth for OR to take root and expand, affecting more editors and articles. That's not the best result. Eventually this all will come to a head, the sooner the better.  +++$+++ I appreciate your comment at hte AN/I report I opened on OR; but ignoring the situation by a widening pool of editors results in a wider berth for OR to take root and expand, affecting more editors and articles. That's not the best result. Eventually this all will come to a head, the sooner the better. [[User:ThuranX|ThuranX]] ([[User talk:ThuranX|talk]]) 23:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
268895 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268894 +++$+++ 268894 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.228648200E09 +++$+++ I will reply on your page.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I will reply on your page.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

525413 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-30 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.185855120E09 +++$+++ Can you also shade the 3rd column of the [[Template:Anabolic steroids]] to a yet darker color than the 2nd one? I think that would look better. I'm not sure exactly how to do it. Thanks.  +++$+++ Can you also shade the 3rd column of the [[Template:Anabolic steroids]] to a yet darker color than the 2nd one? I think that would look better. I'm not sure exactly how to do it. Thanks. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 21:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
525414 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525413 +++$+++ 525413 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.185870660E09 +++$+++ I don't think that the [[Template:Navbox generic]] supports that feature -- sorry. -- +++$+++ :I don't think that the [[Template:Navbox generic]] supports that feature -- sorry. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
525415 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525413 +++$+++ 525414 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.185873000E09 +++$+++ Can't you copy the source from [[Template:Navbox generic]] and paste it into the [[Template:Anabolic steroids]] altering it as needed?  +++$+++ ::Can't you copy the source from [[Template:Navbox generic]] and paste it into the [[Template:Anabolic steroids]] altering it as needed? [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 02:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

6752 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.183600860E09 +++$+++ (Emphasis added.) Just wanted to make sure you were aware of the policy.  +++$+++ (Emphasis added.) Just wanted to make sure you were aware of the policy. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] 19:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6753 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.183609320E09 +++$+++ Raymond, I am aware of the policy.  Mann has consistently attempted to block access to his data and methods.  By (redact libel per WP:BLP) I am only applying the description found at [[Pseudoscience]]. Are you saying this description is not a reliable source? Or is there some other issue at stake here?  +++$+++ ::Raymond, I am aware of the policy.  Mann has consistently attempted to block access to his data and methods.  By (redact libel per WP:BLP) I am only applying the description found at [[Pseudoscience]]. Are you saying this description is not a reliable source? Or is there some other issue at stake here? [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 21:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6754 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.183609680E09 +++$+++ No, Wikipedia does not consider itself (or wikis in general) as a reliable source. Surely you know such a basic policy?  +++$+++ :::No, Wikipedia does not consider itself (or wikis in general) as a reliable source. Surely you know such a basic policy? [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] 21:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6755 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.183610160E09 +++$+++ Moreover, the ''definition'' of [[pseudoscience]] in our article is \"Pseudoscience is any body of knowledge, methodology, belief, or practice that claims to be scientific or is made to appear scientific, but does not adhere to the basic requirements of the scientific method\". Data sharing is part of scientific culture, but not a basic requirement the scientific method. You can do perfectly good science if you are alone on an island. So even under your misapprehension about data sharing, this fails. -- +++$+++ ::::Moreover, the ''definition'' of [[pseudoscience]] in our article is "Pseudoscience is any body of knowledge, methodology, belief, or practice that claims to be scientific or is made to appear scientific, but does not adhere to the basic requirements of the scientific method". Data sharing is part of scientific culture, but not a basic requirement the scientific method. You can do perfectly good science if you are alone on an island. So even under your misapprehension about data sharing, this fails. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 21:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6756 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.183610520E09 +++$+++ Stephan, let's not argue over semantics here.  The description reads: ''Pseudosciences may be characterised by the use of vague, exaggerated or untestable claims, over-reliance on confirmation rather than refutation, lack of openness to testing by other experts, and a lack of progress in theory development.''  This clearly describes Mann's actions and the actions of others on the \"Hockey Team.\"   +++$+++ :::::Stephan, let's not argue over semantics here.  The description reads: ''Pseudosciences may be characterised by the use of vague, exaggerated or untestable claims, over-reliance on confirmation rather than refutation, lack of openness to testing by other experts, and a lack of progress in theory development.''  This clearly describes Mann's actions and the actions of others on the "Hockey Team."  [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 21:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6757 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.183610520E09 +++$+++ Raymond, I was not aware Wikipedia does not allow editors to use Wikipedia articles to support their claims on Talk pages.  I see it done all the time.  But no matter.  The sources quoted by [[Pseudoscience]] are reliable sources and they are all in agreement.  As I stated before, I am only applying the description (supported by reliable sources) that has already been accepted by the Wikipedia community.  +++$+++ ::::::Raymond, I was not aware Wikipedia does not allow editors to use Wikipedia articles to support their claims on Talk pages.  I see it done all the time.  But no matter.  The sources quoted by [[Pseudoscience]] are reliable sources and they are all in agreement.  As I stated before, I am only applying the description (supported by reliable sources) that has already been accepted by the Wikipedia community. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 21:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6758 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.183610760E09 +++$+++ If you guys want me to rephrase my statements so that I sound like a lawyer, I can do that.  I think it sounds boring but I am willing to go along.  +++$+++ :::::::If you guys want me to rephrase my statements so that I sound like a lawyer, I can do that.  I think it sounds boring but I am willing to go along. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 21:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6759 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.183613340E09 +++$+++ Ron, we are talking about semantics here. You do not have a reliable source that calls Mann a pseudoscientist. You do have sources, the reliability of which we have different opions about, describing some of Mann's behaviour. You now try to apply a description to deduce your result. That's a poster example of [[WP:NOR|original research]]. ''And'' its wrong. You confuse cause and symptom. Limping is a frequent symptom of gout. But I may limp because someone dropped a bowling ball on my foot. Lack of openness is a frequent syptom of pseudoscience. But some scientists may be less that forthcoming with their data due to reasons of national security, or because some Canadians have already written 5 hatchet job papers about them and have overstayed their welcome.-- +++$+++ ::::::::Ron, we are talking about semantics here. You do not have a reliable source that calls Mann a pseudoscientist. You do have sources, the reliability of which we have different opions about, describing some of Mann's behaviour. You now try to apply a description to deduce your result. That's a poster example of [[WP:NOR|original research]]. ''And'' its wrong. You confuse cause and symptom. Limping is a frequent symptom of gout. But I may limp because someone dropped a bowling ball on my foot. Lack of openness is a frequent syptom of pseudoscience. But some scientists may be less that forthcoming with their data due to reasons of national security, or because some Canadians have already written 5 hatchet job papers about them and have overstayed their welcome.--[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 22:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6760 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.183613700E09 +++$+++ Stephan, I appreciate you expressing your opinion.  But openness is a requirement of science, not an option. A lack of openness is the behavior of a pseudoscientist.  I do not know how many papers McI and McK wrote (if any) before Mann quit providing data, but it does not matter.  He has to continue to provide data regardless.  Try telling the tax authority in your country that you are going to quit providing data for your audit because you were convicted of tax fraud once before.  That will not go over well.  Alarmists like Mann have to realize skeptics will continue to be skeptical as long as the science is being sloppily done without proper archiving and openness.  +++$+++ :::::::::Stephan, I appreciate you expressing your opinion.  But openness is a requirement of science, not an option. A lack of openness is the behavior of a pseudoscientist.  I do not know how many papers McI and McK wrote (if any) before Mann quit providing data, but it does not matter.  He has to continue to provide data regardless.  Try telling the tax authority in your country that you are going to quit providing data for your audit because you were convicted of tax fraud once before.  That will not go over well.  Alarmists like Mann have to realize skeptics will continue to be skeptical as long as the science is being sloppily done without proper archiving and openness. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 22:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
6761 +++$+++  +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ SC, what is the point of this post? The Talk page is supposed to be about making the article better. You are not suggesting anything to make the article better but are merely trying to convince people of a rumor. Academia's rumor mill is no better than the internet's rumor mill. This is a misuse of Wikipedia. It could get get you disciplined, blocked or banned. Worse, Wikipedia or you could get sued. RonCram 06:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :SC, what is the point of this post? The Talk page is supposed to be about making the article better. You are not suggesting anything to make the article better but are merely trying to convince people of a rumor. Academia's rumor mill is no better than the internet's rumor mill. This is a misuse of Wikipedia. It could get get you disciplined, blocked or banned. Worse, Wikipedia or you could get sued. RonCram 06:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
6762 +++$+++  +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ 6752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ As someone who knows both academia and Wikipedia policy reasonably well, I was trying to inform people about the situation we're dealing with; there's a difference between 1) likely true, but unverifiable as of yet, and 2) a silly rumor. That seems relevant to how we deal with the article. I have more to say about your comment on your talk page momentarily\u2014but the short version for those who are reading this is your last two sentences are false and I sincerely hope you don't use this kind of heavy-handed bullying on new users who might fall for it. -- SCZenz 06:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :As someone who knows both academia and Wikipedia policy reasonably well, I was trying to inform people about the situation we're dealing with; there's a difference between 1) likely true, but unverifiable as of yet, and 2) a silly rumor. That seems relevant to how we deal with the article. I have more to say about your comment on your talk page momentarily—but the short version for those who are reading this is your last two sentences are false and I sincerely hope you don't use this kind of heavy-handed bullying on new users who might fall for it. -- SCZenz 06:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

268898 +++$+++ Joopercoopers +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-06 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.228582560E09 +++$+++ Hey Mattisse - I'm trying to tidy up the prose a little at [[Ancient Chinese wooden architecture]]. Great article by the way. I was wondering if you might be able to shed some light on a sentence in the foundations section - at the end of the paragraph it said \"Introduction of whitewashed alled , painted pottery.\" - I've commented it out for now - any idea what the intended meaning might have been. Many thanks. -- +++$+++ Hey Mattisse - I'm trying to tidy up the prose a little at [[Ancient Chinese wooden architecture]]. Great article by the way. I was wondering if you might be able to shed some light on a sentence in the foundations section - at the end of the paragraph it said "Introduction of whitewashed alled , painted pottery." - I've commented it out for now - any idea what the intended meaning might have been. Many thanks. --[[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]] ([[User talk:Joopercoopers|talk]]) 08:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
268899 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268898 +++$+++ 268898 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.228648080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking an interest in the article, as I had become discouraged by some of the additions to it. I have several good books from which  I was drawing information for the article. As far as I remember, I would not have added anything about whitewash or painted pottery. I was interested strictly in the \"wooden architecture\" part, as China has a long and interesting history of wooden architecture and developed its own forms. The article was meant to counter the purely western view and terminology with which Chinese architecture is usually described. I will look at the article soon and see what you are doing! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks for taking an interest in the article, as I had become discouraged by some of the additions to it. I have several good books from which  I was drawing information for the article. As far as I remember, I would not have added anything about whitewash or painted pottery. I was interested strictly in the "wooden architecture" part, as China has a long and interesting history of wooden architecture and developed its own forms. The article was meant to counter the purely western view and terminology with which Chinese architecture is usually described. I will look at the article soon and see what you are doing! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
268900 +++$+++ Joopercoopers +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268898 +++$+++ 268899 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.228803060E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's why it was on my watchlist - I interceded on the talk page at the time and made a note to give it a bit of a brush up. Such early codification and the pattern books were a real eye opener to me, absolutely fascinating. I wonder if we can find a few more images to replace the now perhaps over-used [[Yingzao Fashi]]. I thought some of the [[Dougong]] might be good, but there's nothing on that page that's definitely within your time period - it would be nice to see some extant examples, if any survive. As a personal preference, I usually use 'timber' rather than 'wood' when referring to it's use in buildings. Kind regards -- +++$+++ ::Yes, that's why it was on my watchlist - I interceded on the talk page at the time and made a note to give it a bit of a brush up. Such early codification and the pattern books were a real eye opener to me, absolutely fascinating. I wonder if we can find a few more images to replace the now perhaps over-used [[Yingzao Fashi]]. I thought some of the [[Dougong]] might be good, but there's nothing on that page that's definitely within your time period - it would be nice to see some extant examples, if any survive. As a personal preference, I usually use 'timber' rather than 'wood' when referring to it's use in buildings. Kind regards --[[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]] ([[User talk:Joopercoopers|talk]]) 22:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
268901 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268898 +++$+++ 268900 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.228805100E09 +++$+++ I am so glad you are interested! The Chinese were\/are amazing. I will start looking around again and see what if there is anything new.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::I am so glad you are interested! The Chinese were/are amazing. I will start looking around again and see what if there is anything new.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

268902 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-08 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.228723800E09 +++$+++ Yeah, SRX did, he has watched the article since I first began. He gave thoughts on it when it was under peer review before GA and before Lockdown's first FAC. We've had discussions over it for begin long and too in-depth since I began. So for him to support it does mean it is good, which I like. I see it passing as well, I just wonder how much longer the review will stay open. No one besides me has edited the page for four days. But I'll wait, I have other stuff to work on. I have around 52 ppvs to work on, and 12 of those are from this year. Thanks for supporting it, I can't say that enough. Not to sound weird or anything but it gave me hope that it would pass.-- +++$+++ Yeah, SRX did, he has watched the article since I first began. He gave thoughts on it when it was under peer review before GA and before Lockdown's first FAC. We've had discussions over it for begin long and too in-depth since I began. So for him to support it does mean it is good, which I like. I see it passing as well, I just wonder how much longer the review will stay open. No one besides me has edited the page for four days. But I'll wait, I have other stuff to work on. I have around 52 ppvs to work on, and 12 of those are from this year. Thanks for supporting it, I can't say that enough. Not to sound weird or anything but it gave me hope that it would pass.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 00:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
268903 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268902 +++$+++ 268902 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.228724880E09 +++$+++ That's good, now I'll know what an FA is and learn from my mistakes with other articles I plan to take to FAC. Thanks for the help as well. When\/if it passes you can, if you want, add one of those FA boxes saying you help get it there, if that is okay to do since you supported it.-- +++$+++ :That's good, now I'll know what an FA is and learn from my mistakes with other articles I plan to take to FAC. Thanks for the help as well. When/if it passes you can, if you want, add one of those FA boxes saying you help get it there, if that is okay to do since you supported it.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 00:28, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

268904 +++$+++ 59.91.253.89 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-08 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.228744500E09 +++$+++ since [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=256571060&oldid=256549218 this] will be removed soon. [[Special:Contributions\/59.91.253.89|59.91.253.89]] ( +++$+++ since [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=256571060&oldid=256549218 this] will be removed soon. [[Special:Contributions/59.91.253.89|59.91.253.89]] ([[User talk:59.91.253.89|talk]]) 05:55, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
268905 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268904 +++$+++ 268904 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.228787100E09 +++$+++ Reply: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=256649549&oldid=256644772], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=256650941&oldid=256649549]. &mdash; +++$+++ *Reply: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=256649549&oldid=256644772], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=256650941&oldid=256649549]. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

531049 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-01 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.272743580E09 +++$+++ Yes, I was. I believe they could be helpful to show what the cars look like. The pictures about the speedway could be helpful by showing viewers what the track looks like. --''' +++$+++ Yes, I was. I believe they could be helpful to show what the cars look like. The pictures about the speedway could be helpful by showing viewers what the track looks like. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 12:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
531050 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531049 +++$+++ 531049 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.272829320E09 +++$+++ Absolutely, showing what the cars and tracks look like is critical. I've uploaded hundreds of pictures, maybe thousands, going back into at least the 1970s - most are ones that others took and posted on Flickr. Please upload to [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Main_Page Commons] so that the other Wikipedias can use them - they certainly have been using them especially the German Wikipedia. There are categories for [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Category:NASCAR_cars NASCAR cars] and [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Category:NASCAR_circuits NASCAR circuits], so please add them there. I always use a [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~bryan\/flickr\/upload tool] to upload the flickr pictures - really fast, it takes car of the weird license tagging issues, and it's very quick. Thanks for doing this! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Absolutely, showing what the cars and tracks look like is critical. I've uploaded hundreds of pictures, maybe thousands, going back into at least the 1970s - most are ones that others took and posted on Flickr. Please upload to [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Commons] so that the other Wikipedias can use them - they certainly have been using them especially the German Wikipedia. There are categories for [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:NASCAR_cars NASCAR cars] and [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:NASCAR_circuits NASCAR circuits], so please add them there. I always use a [http://toolserver.org/~bryan/flickr/upload tool] to upload the flickr pictures - really fast, it takes car of the weird license tagging issues, and it's very quick. Thanks for doing this! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
531051 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531049 +++$+++ 531050 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.272834480E09 +++$+++ I uploaded the photos to Commons to begin with. If you would like to see which photos I have uploaded, you can go to my user page or my [[:Commons:User:Nascar1996|user page]] in Commons. Also, I will add the categorys to them as well. --''' +++$+++ ::I uploaded the photos to Commons to begin with. If you would like to see which photos I have uploaded, you can go to my user page or my [[:Commons:User:Nascar1996|user page]] in Commons. Also, I will add the categorys to them as well. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 14:08, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
531052 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531049 +++$+++ 531051 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.272846600E09 +++$+++ Could you do a peer review on [[2010 Subway Fresh Fit 600]]? Thanks --''' +++$+++ :::Could you do a peer review on [[2010 Subway Fresh Fit 600]]? Thanks --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 17:30, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
531053 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531049 +++$+++ 531052 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.272846780E09 +++$+++ Nevermind. --''' +++$+++ ::::Nevermind. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 17:33, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
531054 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531049 +++$+++ 531053 +++$+++ 2010-05-03 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.272877200E09 +++$+++ I don't have the time - my plate is too full and others keep making it fuller. I have a great prospect for an AWESOME bunch of pictures - claims he was the first official NASCAR photographer in the mid 1990s and the pictures look to be exactly that! That's likely to take a long time just to look through 200 images - but there are great pictures of [[Kenny Irwin]] and [[Harry Gant]], Jeff Gordon with his Cup trophy, Earnhardt... I did review the categories in Commons and added some. You did a great job of categorizing. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::I don't have the time - my plate is too full and others keep making it fuller. I have a great prospect for an AWESOME bunch of pictures - claims he was the first official NASCAR photographer in the mid 1990s and the pictures look to be exactly that! That's likely to take a long time just to look through 200 images - but there are great pictures of [[Kenny Irwin]] and [[Harry Gant]], Jeff Gordon with his Cup trophy, Earnhardt... I did review the categories in Commons and added some. You did a great job of categorizing. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
531055 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531049 +++$+++ 531054 +++$+++ 2010-05-03 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.272947460E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I believe I am getting better at editing because I now have 4 GA's, 6 B's, and 2 DYK's! --''' +++$+++ ::::::Thanks. I believe I am getting better at editing because I now have 4 GA's, 6 B's, and 2 DYK's! --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 21:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

268906 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-08 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.228765380E09 +++$+++ Hey, Mattisse.  Long time no talk.  I was wondering if you had any interest in the [[Massie Trial]] article.  It needs a lot of help, and it seems to touch on some of the topics you are familiar with, in particular legal issues.  It's fine if you have no interest, but if you do, there's a lot of sources on the subject.  Let me know.  I should also mention that the entire article needs to be rewritten.  Talk to you soon.  +++$+++ Hey, Mattisse.  Long time no talk.  I was wondering if you had any interest in the [[Massie Trial]] article.  It needs a lot of help, and it seems to touch on some of the topics you are familiar with, in particular legal issues.  It's fine if you have no interest, but if you do, there's a lot of sources on the subject.  Let me know.  I should also mention that the entire article needs to be rewritten.  Talk to you soon. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 11:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
268907 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268906 +++$+++ 268906 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.228799100E09 +++$+++ I am interested if you have some good sources. I would welcome something new to work on. It is unclear from the article what is unusual about the actual facts of the case. Most of the article is unreferenced and the whole thing needs rewriting. Depending on the nature of the references you have, it could either be a legally interesting case (if you have legal references) or interesting because it was made into a movie. (A couple of the links are dead on the page.)  &mdash; +++$+++ :I am interested if you have some good sources. I would welcome something new to work on. It is unclear from the article what is unusual about the actual facts of the case. Most of the article is unreferenced and the whole thing needs rewriting. Depending on the nature of the references you have, it could either be a legally interesting case (if you have legal references) or interesting because it was made into a movie. (A couple of the links are dead on the page.)  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:05, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
268908 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268906 +++$+++ 268907 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.228804500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking a look.  I've got a list of the best sources around here somewhere.  Let me try to find them.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for taking a look.  I've got a list of the best sources around here somewhere.  Let me try to find them. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 22:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
268909 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268906 +++$+++ 268908 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.228807380E09 +++$+++ Moved some to [[Talk:Massie Trial\/temp]], but these are the most popular sources, not necessarily the best.  You know, Google books has a huge number of sources on this topic, especially legal sources. I'm trying to add them to the temp page for you. But, there's enough to keep you busy on GBooks (and scholar) for a while.  +++$+++ :::Moved some to [[Talk:Massie Trial/temp]], but these are the most popular sources, not necessarily the best.  You know, Google books has a huge number of sources on this topic, especially legal sources. I'm trying to add them to the temp page for you. But, there's enough to keep you busy on GBooks (and scholar) for a while. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 23:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

6763 +++$+++ SCZenz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-09 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.186666860E09 +++$+++ Now that I've explained myself, please clarify under what policy I could be \"disciplined, blocked or banned\" under.  If you truly believe that I am exposing Wikipedia to legal risk, please contact [[User:Mikegodwin|Wikipedia's General Counsel]] by email and ask him to clarify the situation privately.  &mdash;  +++$+++ Now that I've explained myself, please clarify under what policy I could be "disciplined, blocked or banned" under.  If you truly believe that I am exposing Wikipedia to legal risk, please contact [[User:Mikegodwin|Wikipedia's General Counsel]] by email and ask him to clarify the situation privately.  &mdash; [[User:SCZenz|SCZenz]] 06:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
6764 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6763 +++$+++ 6763 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.186693320E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you did not know the policy applies to the Talk pages.  If that is true, you know it now.  I would advise you to go to the Talk page and delete your comment and mine.  It is the right thing to do.  +++$+++ :Perhaps you did not know the policy applies to the Talk pages.  If that is true, you know it now.  I would advise you to go to the Talk page and delete your comment and mine.  It is the right thing to do. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 14:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
6765 +++$+++ SCZenz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6763 +++$+++ 6764 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.186694640E09 +++$+++ I doubt very much that further discussion will lead anywhere in this case, but I do hope and ''expect'' that you will avoid threats for first-time, possibly-inadvertent policy violations in the future.  From [[WP:BLOCK|blocking policy]], \"blocks are used to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia\"; they're certainly not a hammer to insure compliance.  Except in the case of blatant, deliberate vandalism, I never even mention blocks on the first offense. --  +++$+++ ::I doubt very much that further discussion will lead anywhere in this case, but I do hope and ''expect'' that you will avoid threats for first-time, possibly-inadvertent policy violations in the future.  From [[WP:BLOCK|blocking policy]], "blocks are used to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia"; they're certainly not a hammer to insure compliance.  Except in the case of blatant, deliberate vandalism, I never even mention blocks on the first offense. -- [[User:SCZenz|SCZenz]] 14:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
6766 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6763 +++$+++ 6765 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.186694940E09 +++$+++ Actions that are known to bring lawsuits can cause \"damage or disruption to Wikipedia.\"  I am trying to do you a favor by asking you to remove the post yourself.  I have explained that it violates Wikipedia policy.  By removing the post yourself, you are showing good faith.  If you do not remove it, I will.  But if Motl decides to sue, that leaves you with greater legal exposure.  I really am trying to help you here.  +++$+++ :::Actions that are known to bring lawsuits can cause "damage or disruption to Wikipedia."  I am trying to do you a favor by asking you to remove the post yourself.  I have explained that it violates Wikipedia policy.  By removing the post yourself, you are showing good faith.  If you do not remove it, I will.  But if Motl decides to sue, that leaves you with greater legal exposure.  I really am trying to help you here. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 14:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
6767 +++$+++ SCZenz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6763 +++$+++ 6766 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.186695540E09 +++$+++ I'm not saying you're wrong about the talk page comment; it looks a bit too speculative when I consider it again.  I won't contest its removal.  But policy is not a hammer for getting another user to admit you're right; stop using it that way. --  +++$+++ ::::I'm not saying you're wrong about the talk page comment; it looks a bit too speculative when I consider it again.  I won't contest its removal.  But policy is not a hammer for getting another user to admit you're right; stop using it that way. -- [[User:SCZenz|SCZenz]] 14:39, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
6768 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6763 +++$+++ 6767 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.186697220E09 +++$+++ You think I'm trying to use it as a hammer to get you to admit I'm right?  GEEZ.  I was trying to teach you something so you will not make a mistake like that again.  Have you ever been sued?  You can be sued for anything, whether the suit has merit or not. It's a hassle and expensive. Even if the other person has no chance of winning, you still have to hire a lawyer and defend yourself.  And it is the same for Wikipedia - a hassle and expensive.  In this case, we do not know the facts.  You might even lose if he sued you. I was trying to help you out by asking you to remove the offending material yourself.  Doing so would have shown a good faith effort not to harm.  You probably could have gotten the suit dismissed during the discovery phase.  Too late for that.  I have removed it myself.  Honestly, I doubt Motl will sue.  But if he is still at Harvard and chooses to, it will be expensive for you now.  +++$+++ :::::You think I'm trying to use it as a hammer to get you to admit I'm right?  GEEZ.  I was trying to teach you something so you will not make a mistake like that again.  Have you ever been sued?  You can be sued for anything, whether the suit has merit or not. It's a hassle and expensive. Even if the other person has no chance of winning, you still have to hire a lawyer and defend yourself.  And it is the same for Wikipedia - a hassle and expensive.  In this case, we do not know the facts.  You might even lose if he sued you. I was trying to help you out by asking you to remove the offending material yourself.  Doing so would have shown a good faith effort not to harm.  You probably could have gotten the suit dismissed during the discovery phase.  Too late for that.  I have removed it myself.  Honestly, I doubt Motl will sue.  But if he is still at Harvard and chooses to, it will be expensive for you now. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 15:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

268910 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268910 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-08 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.228808400E09 +++$+++ Although editorials probably shouldn't be used as sources, here's a good summary of the case to get you up to speed: [http:\/\/archives.starbulletin.com\/1999\/07\/24\/editorial\/special2.html].  +++$+++ Although editorials probably shouldn't be used as sources, here's a good summary of the case to get you up to speed: [http://archives.starbulletin.com/1999/07/24/editorial/special2.html]. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 23:40, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
268911 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268910 +++$+++ 268910 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.228808640E09 +++$+++ Ah, turns out this great editorial is based on a conference paper, so I'll try adding the original source to the list.  +++$+++ :Ah, turns out this great editorial is based on a conference paper, so I'll try adding the original source to the list. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 23:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

268912 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-08 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.228809300E09 +++$+++ What do you suggest we do with the ''citation needed''?  Once we remove that, I would say it's pretty close to a GA.  What do you think?  +++$+++ What do you suggest we do with the ''citation needed''?  Once we remove that, I would say it's pretty close to a GA.  What do you think? [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 23:55, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
268913 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268912 +++$+++ 268912 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.228810380E09 +++$+++ How nice that you think of the article for GA! I have never nominated any of my articles for anything so it probably would be good for me to go through that experience.  I would certainly support you. Maybe this would get me back on the track of writing articles again, as I have grown discouraged. Maybe we could be a term! &mdash; +++$+++ :How nice that you think of the article for GA! I have never nominated any of my articles for anything so it probably would be good for me to go through that experience.  I would certainly support you. Maybe this would get me back on the track of writing articles again, as I have grown discouraged. Maybe we could be a term! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
268914 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268912 +++$+++ 268913 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.228810920E09 +++$+++ Sounds like a plant! :-)  +++$+++ ::Sounds like a plant! :-) [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 00:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
268915 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268912 +++$+++ 268914 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.228819260E09 +++$+++ The [[Sell v. United States]] may take a little work - broken links and such - plus some scrutiny of the info, since it has been a while and I found a good new article. Maybe a day, then I can start on the other one you suggested. Legal stuff will be a relief to work on!  &mdash; +++$+++ :::The [[Sell v. United States]] may take a little work - broken links and such - plus some scrutiny of the info, since it has been a while and I found a good new article. Maybe a day, then I can start on the other one you suggested. Legal stuff will be a relief to work on!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
268916 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268912 +++$+++ 268915 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.228819860E09 +++$+++ Looking forward to it. I'm going to do some work on ''[[Amaranthus brownii]]'' tonight, and try to at least get it ready for GA.  It's already had a peer review, but there are some outstanding issues.  If you are interested in taking a look at that as well, feel free.  Have a great day, and I look forward to more collaboration.  +++$+++ ::::Looking forward to it. I'm going to do some work on ''[[Amaranthus brownii]]'' tonight, and try to at least get it ready for GA.  It's already had a peer review, but there are some outstanding issues.  If you are interested in taking a look at that as well, feel free.  Have a great day, and I look forward to more collaboration. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 02:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
268917 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268912 +++$+++ 268916 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.228820460E09 +++$+++ O.K. Tomorrow, as I am about out of steam tonight!  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::O.K. Tomorrow, as I am about out of steam tonight!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

6769 +++$+++ Nethgirb +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-22 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.187841420E09 +++$+++ Hi Ron: please stop psychoanalyzing other editors. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlobal_warming_controversy&diff=152944398&oldid=152929402][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlobal_warming_controversy&diff=152950107&oldid=152945436] It doesn't help improve the article.  Discuss the content, not the contributors. -- +++$+++ Hi Ron: please stop psychoanalyzing other editors. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlobal_warming_controversy&diff=152944398&oldid=152929402][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlobal_warming_controversy&diff=152950107&oldid=152945436] It doesn't help improve the article.  Discuss the content, not the contributors. --[[User:Nethgirb|Nethgirb]] 20:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
6770 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6769 +++$+++ 6769 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.187861220E09 +++$+++ Nethgirb, I fail to see that I have done anything wrong.  I was discussing the article and the thought processes editors should be using to make certain the article is NPOV.  I certainly was not psychoanalyzing them.  I never asked about their relationship to their mother or asked if they were abused by their uncle.  If you truly think there is something wrong with my comments, direct me to a guideline that explains what was wrong.  My comments were along the line discussed in [[WP:WFTE]].  +++$+++ :Nethgirb, I fail to see that I have done anything wrong.  I was discussing the article and the thought processes editors should be using to make certain the article is NPOV.  I certainly was not psychoanalyzing them.  I never asked about their relationship to their mother or asked if they were abused by their uncle.  If you truly think there is something wrong with my comments, direct me to a guideline that explains what was wrong.  My comments were along the line discussed in [[WP:WFTE]]. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 02:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
6771 +++$+++ Nethgirb +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6769 +++$+++ 6770 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.187874720E09 +++$+++ Actually, [[WP:WFTE]] (which says it's useful to explain the arguments of the opposing side) is roughly the opposite of what you were suggesting (that you and WMC shouldn't get to write the portion of the article that deals with your respective opposing sides).  The principle ''Comment on content, not on the contributor'' is from [[WP:NPA]].  I don't think what you said was a personal attack, but the principal applies. I'm not suggesting that you violated any particular policy; just that your comments were unhelpful. If you need more explanation, you might get an opinion from an uninvolved admin. -- +++$+++ ::Actually, [[WP:WFTE]] (which says it's useful to explain the arguments of the opposing side) is roughly the opposite of what you were suggesting (that you and WMC shouldn't get to write the portion of the article that deals with your respective opposing sides).  The principle ''Comment on content, not on the contributor'' is from [[WP:NPA]].  I don't think what you said was a personal attack, but the principal applies. I'm not suggesting that you violated any particular policy; just that your comments were unhelpful. If you need more explanation, you might get an opinion from an uninvolved admin. --[[User:Nethgirb|Nethgirb]] 06:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
6772 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6769 +++$+++ 6771 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.187899740E09 +++$+++ Nethgirb, I appreciate the fact you clarified that I have not violated any policy.  I disagree that my comments were unhelpful.  I think my comments helped people to see things from a different perspective which is usually helpful.  If people feel so strongly about an issue that they cannot write and explain the other viewpoint, the least they can do is allow the other side to speak for themselves.  Suppression of information deemed crucial to the other side is not the way to achieve an NPOV article.  +++$+++ :::Nethgirb, I appreciate the fact you clarified that I have not violated any policy.  I disagree that my comments were unhelpful.  I think my comments helped people to see things from a different perspective which is usually helpful.  If people feel so strongly about an issue that they cannot write and explain the other viewpoint, the least they can do is allow the other side to speak for themselves.  Suppression of information deemed crucial to the other side is not the way to achieve an NPOV article. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 13:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
6773 +++$+++ Nethgirb +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6769 +++$+++ 6772 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.187945760E09 +++$+++ I can understand that you feel frustrated with what you see as bias among the other editors\u2014we all feel that way.  But even if there is POV bias among the AGW editors, this is the wrong way to fix the problem.  Two wrongs don't make a right.  Instead of suggesting that some editors be shut out of part of the article, it would be better to focus on the content that you feel is unfairly represented and justify your position. In particular, the facts that ''you'' deem this information to be crucial, and that you happen to be a GW skeptic, are not enough to make it notable. -- +++$+++ ::::I can understand that you feel frustrated with what you see as bias among the other editors—we all feel that way.  But even if there is POV bias among the AGW editors, this is the wrong way to fix the problem.  Two wrongs don't make a right.  Instead of suggesting that some editors be shut out of part of the article, it would be better to focus on the content that you feel is unfairly represented and justify your position. In particular, the facts that ''you'' deem this information to be crucial, and that you happen to be a GW skeptic, are not enough to make it notable. --[[User:Nethgirb|Nethgirb]] 01:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
6774 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6769 +++$+++ 6773 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.187951460E09 +++$+++ Nethgirb, if someone told me that my view that AGW is built on faulty science was preventing me from being fair to the position, I would reevaluate my actions.  If someone said I should not attempt to silence another viewpoint as long as it was supported by a reliable source, I would stop.  Yet this does not happen when I ask the same of others.  Let me ask you a question.  Where should Wikipedia readers go if they wanted to know the scientific evidence for and against AGW? What article would be the most likely or suitable article for this to be found?  Now that you have the article in mind, what would it take - think in terms of the strongest possible evidence necessary - to get Wikipedia editors to accept this info into the article?  This is where I find myself.  The most obvious article is one on the controversy around global warming science.  What is the strongest evidence possible?  Peer-reviewed papers.  So I present peer-reviewed papers and editors still want to suppress the information.  There is no way you can consider this article NPOV if peer-reviewed papers from the anti-AGW camp are not discussed. Don't you see that?  +++$+++ :::::Nethgirb, if someone told me that my view that AGW is built on faulty science was preventing me from being fair to the position, I would reevaluate my actions.  If someone said I should not attempt to silence another viewpoint as long as it was supported by a reliable source, I would stop.  Yet this does not happen when I ask the same of others.  Let me ask you a question.  Where should Wikipedia readers go if they wanted to know the scientific evidence for and against AGW? What article would be the most likely or suitable article for this to be found?  Now that you have the article in mind, what would it take - think in terms of the strongest possible evidence necessary - to get Wikipedia editors to accept this info into the article?  This is where I find myself.  The most obvious article is one on the controversy around global warming science.  What is the strongest evidence possible?  Peer-reviewed papers.  So I present peer-reviewed papers and editors still want to suppress the information.  There is no way you can consider this article NPOV if peer-reviewed papers from the anti-AGW camp are not discussed. Don't you see that? [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 03:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
6775 +++$+++ Nethgirb +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6769 +++$+++ 6774 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.187953980E09 +++$+++ First off, let me say that most of your comments here I think are productive discussion since you are talking about the content, and I see where you're coming from and you deserve a response.  I agree with you that GWC should have a discussion of scientific challenges to GW... and yes, peer-reviewed research is a reliable source. The only question is whether this particular paper is sufficiently notable for inclusion. Although I suggested the applying \"two independent sources\" rule, that doesn't mean I think it shouldn't be included; actually, I haven't decided. -- +++$+++ ::::::First off, let me say that most of your comments here I think are productive discussion since you are talking about the content, and I see where you're coming from and you deserve a response.  I agree with you that GWC should have a discussion of scientific challenges to GW... and yes, peer-reviewed research is a reliable source. The only question is whether this particular paper is sufficiently notable for inclusion. Although I suggested the applying "two independent sources" rule, that doesn't mean I think it shouldn't be included; actually, I haven't decided. --[[User:Nethgirb|Nethgirb]] 04:13, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
6776 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6769 +++$+++ 6775 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.187955480E09 +++$+++ And what would convince you it is sufficiently notable?  +++$+++ :::::::And what would convince you it is sufficiently notable? [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 04:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

585071 +++$+++ Arnon Chaffin  +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585071 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.204765260E09 +++$+++ only 2 weeks..? <font face=\"Brush Script MT\" size=\"2\"> +++$+++ only 2 weeks..? <font face="Brush Script MT" size="2">[[User:Arnon Chaffin|<font color="#FF 45 00">'''Arnon Chaffin'''</font>]] ([[User_talk:Arnon Chaffin |<font color="DA A5 20">Talk</font>]]) </font> 17:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
585072 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585071 +++$+++ 585071 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.204765440E09 +++$+++ I meant to hit two months but selected the wrong time. Changing now.  +++$+++ :I meant to hit two months but selected the wrong time. Changing now. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
585073 +++$+++ Arnon Chaffin  +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585071 +++$+++ 585072 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.204765440E09 +++$+++ Ok just wanted to let you know. lol <font face=\"Brush Script MT\" size=\"2\"> +++$+++ ::Ok just wanted to let you know. lol <font face="Brush Script MT" size="2">[[User:Arnon Chaffin|<font color="#FF 45 00">'''Arnon Chaffin'''</font>]] ([[User_talk:Arnon Chaffin |<font color="DA A5 20">Talk</font>]]) </font> 17:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
585074 +++$+++ Geologyguy +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585071 +++$+++ 585073 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.204765560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your swift help. Cheers  +++$+++ :::Thanks for your swift help. Cheers [[User:Geologyguy|Geologyguy]] ([[User talk:Geologyguy|talk]]) 17:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
585075 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585071 +++$+++ 585074 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.204765680E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) I saw Phaedriel's talk page show up in my watchlist. I noticed the IP had done a load of vandalizing. Blocked for 2 months now.  +++$+++ ::::You're welcome. :) I saw Phaedriel's talk page show up in my watchlist. I noticed the IP had done a load of vandalizing. Blocked for 2 months now. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

268919 +++$+++ Jennavecia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268919 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-10 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.228916880E09 +++$+++ Enough already, Mattisse. It has become clear that you dislike SandyGeorgia. That's fine and dandy, as this isn't a utopia of rainbows and butterflies, but your incessant underhanded comments, insults and smack talk which provide no evidence of anything need to cease. SandyGeorgia does a great deal of work improving this project and keeping the FAC process running smoothly, and your behavior is becoming disruptive. [[WP:NPA|Comment on content, not the contributor.]] If you have beef with Sandy, try mediation (and bring diffs), else let it go. It's not worth a block.  +++$+++ Enough already, Mattisse. It has become clear that you dislike SandyGeorgia. That's fine and dandy, as this isn't a utopia of rainbows and butterflies, but your incessant underhanded comments, insults and smack talk which provide no evidence of anything need to cease. SandyGeorgia does a great deal of work improving this project and keeping the FAC process running smoothly, and your behavior is becoming disruptive. [[WP:NPA|Comment on content, not the contributor.]] If you have beef with Sandy, try mediation (and bring diffs), else let it go. It's not worth a block. [[User:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#9B30FF">'''ل'''enna</span>]][[User talk:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#63B8FF">vecia</span>]] 05:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
268920 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268919 +++$+++ 268919 +++$+++ 2008-12-10 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.228948440E09 +++$+++ Answered on Malleus talk page, a final tribute to block happy admins.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Answered on Malleus talk page, a final tribute to block happy admins.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
268921 +++$+++ Jennavecia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268919 +++$+++ 268920 +++$+++ 2008-12-10 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.228951500E09 +++$+++ Yes, I'm block-happy. :\/ Another example of your ignorance. This is exactly what Sandy is talking about. Provide some evidence to back up your claims, or stop making them. What does your comment with the link to my notebook even mean? I have no idea, and I don't care. You're trashing other editors, and this isn't a situation of Sandy making a situation about her. You bring her up and make negative comments about her. Just knock it off and go do something else. Your comments are not constructive and they serve no useful purpose. It's disruptive, and your attempts to turn this around to make me out as an admin with an itchy block finger or warning in response to some link I'd not even seen aren't going to work. So, again, take your dispute through DR or let it go.  +++$+++ ::Yes, I'm block-happy. :/ Another example of your ignorance. This is exactly what Sandy is talking about. Provide some evidence to back up your claims, or stop making them. What does your comment with the link to my notebook even mean? I have no idea, and I don't care. You're trashing other editors, and this isn't a situation of Sandy making a situation about her. You bring her up and make negative comments about her. Just knock it off and go do something else. Your comments are not constructive and they serve no useful purpose. It's disruptive, and your attempts to turn this around to make me out as an admin with an itchy block finger or warning in response to some link I'd not even seen aren't going to work. So, again, take your dispute through DR or let it go. [[User:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#9B30FF">'''ل'''enna</span>]][[User talk:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#63B8FF">vecia</span>]] 15:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
268922 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268919 +++$+++ 268921 +++$+++ 2008-12-10 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.228961760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for proving my point. Isn't commenting on my ignorance commenting on the contributor and not the content? It was through reading your talk page, the language there shocking to me at first,  that I learned all sorts of things could be said without punishment\u2014in fact such things I thought were forbidden were actually  were encouraged. Mistakenly, thought it applied to all.  But I realize that Malleus is right in everything he has been saying. Frankly, I had been thinking he was exaggerating a tad and making too much of admin abuse via blocking. But you are driving home his  point. Admins get away with out right personal attacks as happened to me on a FAC; the only consequence was that his personal attack was moved to the talk page. The rest of us are up to the whim of those that can block, just as Malleus says. Now I totally agree with him. Thanks again for proving my point.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Thanks for proving my point. Isn't commenting on my ignorance commenting on the contributor and not the content? It was through reading your talk page, the language there shocking to me at first,  that I learned all sorts of things could be said without punishment—in fact such things I thought were forbidden were actually  were encouraged. Mistakenly, thought it applied to all.  But I realize that Malleus is right in everything he has been saying. Frankly, I had been thinking he was exaggerating a tad and making too much of admin abuse via blocking. But you are driving home his  point. Admins get away with out right personal attacks as happened to me on a FAC; the only consequence was that his personal attack was moved to the talk page. The rest of us are up to the whim of those that can block, just as Malleus says. Now I totally agree with him. Thanks again for proving my point.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:16, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
268923 +++$+++ Jennavecia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268919 +++$+++ 268922 +++$+++ 2008-12-10 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.228977060E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Glad we got this all straightened out. So, you'll not be making anymore personal attacks against Sandy and you won't be getting blocked. Good times.  +++$+++ ::::You're welcome. Glad we got this all straightened out. So, you'll not be making anymore personal attacks against Sandy and you won't be getting blocked. Good times. [[User:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#9B30FF">'''ل'''enna</span>]][[User talk:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Lucida Handwriting Italic;color:#63B8FF">vecia</span>]] 22:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

6777 +++$+++ Nethgirb +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-24 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.188018120E09 +++$+++ (shifting left) Scientifically speaking, criticism or support from other peer-reviewed publications, which requires some time.  After skimming the paper, it seems that Schwartz himself views this work as preliminary and in need of verification: ''\"Here an initial attempt is made to determine climate sensitivity through energy balance considerations ... [The fact that the results are surprising] invites a scrutiny of the each of these findings for possible sources of error of interpretation in the present study. ... Finally, as the present analysis rests on a simple single-compartment energy balance model, the question must inevitably arise whether the rather obdurate climate system might be amenable to determination of its key properties through empirical analysis based on such a simple model. In response to that question it might have to be said that it remains to be seen. In this context it is hoped that the present study might stimulate further work along these lines with more complex models.\"'' This coupled with Annan's criticism would mean that if it were mentioned in the GWC article, it would have to be a very weak statement. -- +++$+++ (shifting left) Scientifically speaking, criticism or support from other peer-reviewed publications, which requires some time.  After skimming the paper, it seems that Schwartz himself views this work as preliminary and in need of verification: ''"Here an initial attempt is made to determine climate sensitivity through energy balance considerations ... [The fact that the results are surprising] invites a scrutiny of the each of these findings for possible sources of error of interpretation in the present study. ... Finally, as the present analysis rests on a simple single-compartment energy balance model, the question must inevitably arise whether the rather obdurate climate system might be amenable to determination of its key properties through empirical analysis based on such a simple model. In response to that question it might have to be said that it remains to be seen. In this context it is hoped that the present study might stimulate further work along these lines with more complex models."'' This coupled with Annan's criticism would mean that if it were mentioned in the GWC article, it would have to be a very weak statement. --[[User:Nethgirb|Nethgirb]] 22:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
6778 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6777 +++$+++ 6777 +++$+++ 2007-08-25 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.188086520E09 +++$+++ I agree that Schwartz's paper needs verification\/auditing.  It may contain errors, but Annan is wrong and has already been refuted on Pielke's blog.  Scwartz's findings are in line with other research and explains some other unusual findings.  +++$+++ :I agree that Schwartz's paper needs verification/auditing.  It may contain errors, but Annan is wrong and has already been refuted on Pielke's blog.  Scwartz's findings are in line with other research and explains some other unusual findings. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 17:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
6779 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6777 +++$+++ 6778 +++$+++ 2007-08-25 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.188087360E09 +++$+++ Where is Annan wrong and where has he been refuted? I looked over the Blog and could find no serious challenge to his analysis. -- +++$+++ ::Where is Annan wrong and where has he been refuted? I looked over the Blog and could find no serious challenge to his analysis. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 17:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
6780 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6777 +++$+++ 6779 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.188113340E09 +++$+++ Annan claimed Schwartz made two errors.  The criticism of Annan I found most compelling was by JamesG in Comments #18 and #26. (JamesG also responds to me in #30.) [http:\/\/climatesci.colorado.edu\/2007\/08\/20\/new-paper-on-the-diagnosis-and-significance-of-ocean-heat-content-changes\/]  Annan replies to JamesG in Comment #33 in which he admits an error but basically claims it does not matter.  Annan did not address the postulation issue.  To summarize: Annan wrote that Schwartz's first error was in the math and yet Annan got the math wrong himself.  Annan claimed Schwartz made a second error because he disagreed with a postulation by Schwartz.  The postulation may or may not prove to be right but it is wrong to claim it is an error.  If Schwartz is correct, it would explains some things - such as why the climate models are consistently too warm.  +++$+++ :::Annan claimed Schwartz made two errors.  The criticism of Annan I found most compelling was by JamesG in Comments #18 and #26. (JamesG also responds to me in #30.) [http://climatesci.colorado.edu/2007/08/20/new-paper-on-the-diagnosis-and-significance-of-ocean-heat-content-changes/]  Annan replies to JamesG in Comment #33 in which he admits an error but basically claims it does not matter.  Annan did not address the postulation issue.  To summarize: Annan wrote that Schwartz's first error was in the math and yet Annan got the math wrong himself.  Annan claimed Schwartz made a second error because he disagreed with a postulation by Schwartz.  The postulation may or may not prove to be right but it is wrong to claim it is an error.  If Schwartz is correct, it would explains some things - such as why the climate models are consistently too warm. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 00:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
6781 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6777 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.188138960E09 +++$+++ Sorry, Ron, but you have the most selective reading ability I have ever seen. The maths ''is'' wrong. The estimated relaxtion constant is wrong as well, and we can easily see why: The auto-correlation feature massively overemphasizes short-term fluctuation which primarily affect the atmosphere. It ignores longer time effects of the deep ocean where most of the heat capacity of the system is. No wonder the result is nonsense. -- +++$+++ :::::Sorry, Ron, but you have the most selective reading ability I have ever seen. The maths ''is'' wrong. The estimated relaxtion constant is wrong as well, and we can easily see why: The auto-correlation feature massively overemphasizes short-term fluctuation which primarily affect the atmosphere. It ignores longer time effects of the deep ocean where most of the heat capacity of the system is. No wonder the result is nonsense. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 07:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
6782 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6777 +++$+++ 6780 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.188114720E09 +++$+++ Stephan, I should mention that if Watts, Pielke and McIntyre are correct in the idea the global surface station network may be overestimating the warming trend, then the climate sensitivity is even less than estimated by Schwartz.  Schwartz's view gives more weight to natural climate variability. +++$+++ ::::Stephan, I should mention that if Watts, Pielke and McIntyre are correct in the idea the global surface station network may be overestimating the warming trend, then the climate sensitivity is even less than estimated by Schwartz.  Schwartz's view gives more weight to natural climate variability.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 00:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
6783 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6777 +++$+++ 6782 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.188138960E09 +++$+++ Even if that were true (which I deeply doubt), it would not make Schwartz's paper any more correct. -- +++$+++ :::::Even if that were true (which I deeply doubt), it would not make Schwartz's paper any more correct. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 07:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

532697 +++$+++ FrankWilliams +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532697 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.168648260E09 +++$+++ It appears that user [[70.128.117.245]] who you blocked is at it again as  [[User:Martiallaws]] with the exact same edits.  Please take appropriate action.  Thanks  +++$+++ It appears that user [[70.128.117.245]] who you blocked is at it again as  [[User:Martiallaws]] with the exact same edits.  Please take appropriate action.  Thanks [[User:FrankWilliams|FrankWilliams]] 16:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
532698 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532697 +++$+++ 532697 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.168649340E09 +++$+++ I have protected the article now so that new users and anons are not able to edit it. I'll keep an eye on the article and I suggest you that you contact directly the user who is making disruptive edits and let him know that this is not a nice thing to do ;-) In any case, it's polite to warn him before he gets blocked :-) (I'll let him a notice now but next time you do it, ok?) --''' +++$+++ : I have protected the article now so that new users and anons are not able to edit it. I'll keep an eye on the article and I suggest you that you contact directly the user who is making disruptive edits and let him know that this is not a nice thing to do ;-) In any case, it's polite to warn him before he gets blocked :-) (I'll let him a notice now but next time you do it, ok?) --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 16:49, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

219583 +++$+++ Wtmitchell +++$+++ Rizalninoynapoleon +++$+++ 219583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-01 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.293874920E09 +++$+++ I've reverted [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=History_of_the_Philippines_%281965%E2%80%931986%29&action=historysubmit&diff=405186807&oldid=404137754 this edit], which had changed the asserted date from 21 Sep 1972 to 23 Sep. I've cited a source supporting the 21 Sep date.  +++$+++ I've reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Philippines_%281965%E2%80%931986%29&action=historysubmit&diff=405186807&oldid=404137754 this edit], which had changed the asserted date from 21 Sep 1972 to 23 Sep. I've cited a source supporting the 21 Sep date. [[User:Wtmitchell|Wtmitchell]]  [[User talk:Wtmitchell|(talk)]] <small>(earlier ''Boracay Bill'')</small> 01:42, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
219584 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Rizalninoynapoleon +++$+++ 219583 +++$+++ 219583 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.296096420E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

268925 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-13 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.229173800E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I hope this clarifies things a little.  If you have any more questions, don't hesitate to shoot me a message...and, of course, don't hesitate to leave any comments or suggestions about DYK because, as you know, I always value your input. &mdash; +++$+++ Anyway, I hope this clarifies things a little.  If you have any more questions, don't hesitate to shoot me a message...and, of course, don't hesitate to leave any comments or suggestions about DYK because, as you know, I always value your input. &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 05:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
268926 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268925 +++$+++ 268925 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.229177400E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Politizer! I have enormous confidence in you, and the examples above that you give of your behavior of  \"splitting hairs\" I don't count  in that category at all. Rather, those are perfectly legitimate requests that promote quality to editors. (Formatting refs need to be taught - I try to take the same attitude in GA. I've also noticed that now editors get a \"notice\" that their hook needs fixing, which is a nice gesture; it was always something I tried to remember to check when I had a DYK in queue!) The length issue has never been a problem at DKY, in my memory, so I was surprised to see it suddenly such an flash point. I worry that there is too much emphasis on \"collecting\" DYks and that too much is being made of being on the \"main page\". But that is just me, I guess, as I thought of DTKs as for the \"little guy\" in many ways, as it is attainable for many who may never have an FAC.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks, Politizer! I have enormous confidence in you, and the examples above that you give of your behavior of  "splitting hairs" I don't count  in that category at all. Rather, those are perfectly legitimate requests that promote quality to editors. (Formatting refs need to be taught - I try to take the same attitude in GA. I've also noticed that now editors get a "notice" that their hook needs fixing, which is a nice gesture; it was always something I tried to remember to check when I had a DYK in queue!) The length issue has never been a problem at DKY, in my memory, so I was surprised to see it suddenly such an flash point. I worry that there is too much emphasis on "collecting" DYks and that too much is being made of being on the "main page". But that is just me, I guess, as I thought of DTKs as for the "little guy" in many ways, as it is attainable for many who may never have an FAC.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 06:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

268927 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268927 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-13 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.229226060E09 +++$+++ I wasn't really trying to take a dig at him, me and him have had probelms over the article for a while. Plus I feel the only reason he said he would oppose is because he wanted his way. I felt I was being accurate but I've let that be and I'm fixing his probelms with it now. +++$+++ I wasn't really trying to take a dig at him, me and him have had probelms over the article for a while. Plus I feel the only reason he said he would oppose is because he wanted his way. I felt I was being accurate but I've let that be and I'm fixing his probelms with it now.[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 19:41, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
268928 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268927 +++$+++ 268927 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.229227320E09 +++$+++ Glad to hear that! Didn't mean to imply I thought he was correct, as I don't know one way or the other. Just that the FAC page is not the place to resolve lingering issues with him. It took a while for your FAC to get \"eyes\". His comment brings attention to your FAC. Even if you disagree with him, it is important that he  has taken an interest in the article and  his removal of his \"Oppose\" will have the effect (almost) of another Support. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Glad to hear that! Didn't mean to imply I thought he was correct, as I don't know one way or the other. Just that the FAC page is not the place to resolve lingering issues with him. It took a while for your FAC to get "eyes". His comment brings attention to your FAC. Even if you disagree with him, it is important that he  has taken an interest in the article and  his removal of his "Oppose" will have the effect (almost) of another Support. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:02, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
268929 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268927 +++$+++ 268928 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.229231040E09 +++$+++ What exactly is \"my level\"? ''' +++$+++ ::What exactly is "my level"? '''[[User:IMatthew|<span style="color:green">aye</span>]][[User talk:IMatthew|<span style="color:red">matthew</span>]]'''</span> <span style="color:blue">[[Hanukkah|✡]]</span> 21:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
268930 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268927 +++$+++ 268927 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.229231520E09 +++$+++ Now lets not all have a fight. Lets put this behind us, thank you for your comments iMatthew. +++$+++ :Now lets not all have a fight. Lets put this behind us, thank you for your comments iMatthew.[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 21:12, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
268931 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268927 +++$+++ 268930 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.229233980E09 +++$+++ (ec) My apologies to IMatthew! My comment was unfortunately worded and directed to the response, rather than to your comment, wanting to stress the importance of neutrally worded responses in an FAC.   I have changed the wording in my post above to reflect my intentions more clearly. I apologize to you for any misunderstanding\/miswording of my comments. In reality, I know nothing about the subject matter, nor do  I have any opinion regarding the merits of your suggestions.   Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :: (ec) My apologies to IMatthew! My comment was unfortunately worded and directed to the response, rather than to your comment, wanting to stress the importance of neutrally worded responses in an FAC.   I have changed the wording in my post above to reflect my intentions more clearly. I apologize to you for any misunderstanding/miswording of my comments. In reality, I know nothing about the subject matter, nor do  I have any opinion regarding the merits of your suggestions.   Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

6784 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-26 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.188158400E09 +++$+++ Stephan, Schwartz may or may not have made an error in the math.  I am not certain yet.  But even if he did, it is not a large error and will not change his results much.  More importantly, when Watts, Pielke and McIntyre are finished with the global temperature record, the CO2 sensitivity will be seen as even less.  The relaxation constant favored by Annan is more a tenet of the AGW faith than it is a fact.  Schwartz's view gives nature a larger role in climate variability and this meshes much better with physical reality.  Take 1934, the hottest year in the U.S.  I understand it was also the hottest year in Europe, so probably the hottest year in the Northern Hemisphere.  The surface station network in the Southern Hemisphere is not as robust as the Northern.  Since 1934, we have had a great deal of UHI effect in the Southern Hemisphere.  This has not been adjusted for by GISS or CRU.  When we are all done analyzing the global temp record, 1934 may be the hottest year globally.  Why would 1934 be so hot when it had so much less CO2?  Could it be natural climate variability?  Why yes! it could!  Where is this naturally variability coming from? From the oceans, to a large degree.  The PDO is the most underestimated climate variable IMHO.  When it is in the warm phase, the world gets warmer.  When it is in a cool phase, the world gets cooler.  This is true regardless of what CO2 is doing.  But there are many other factors we just learning about. According to Spencer's new paper, the tropics have a significant negative feedback. It is not me who has the selective reading problem.  It is the IPCC and the rest of the AGWers who are neglecting the negative feedbacks and the evidence surface temperatures are artificially warm.  +++$+++ Stephan, Schwartz may or may not have made an error in the math.  I am not certain yet.  But even if he did, it is not a large error and will not change his results much.  More importantly, when Watts, Pielke and McIntyre are finished with the global temperature record, the CO2 sensitivity will be seen as even less.  The relaxation constant favored by Annan is more a tenet of the AGW faith than it is a fact.  Schwartz's view gives nature a larger role in climate variability and this meshes much better with physical reality.  Take 1934, the hottest year in the U.S.  I understand it was also the hottest year in Europe, so probably the hottest year in the Northern Hemisphere.  The surface station network in the Southern Hemisphere is not as robust as the Northern.  Since 1934, we have had a great deal of UHI effect in the Southern Hemisphere.  This has not been adjusted for by GISS or CRU.  When we are all done analyzing the global temp record, 1934 may be the hottest year globally.  Why would 1934 be so hot when it had so much less CO2?  Could it be natural climate variability?  Why yes! it could!  Where is this naturally variability coming from? From the oceans, to a large degree.  The PDO is the most underestimated climate variable IMHO.  When it is in the warm phase, the world gets warmer.  When it is in a cool phase, the world gets cooler.  This is true regardless of what CO2 is doing.  But there are many other factors we just learning about. According to Spencer's new paper, the tropics have a significant negative feedback. It is not me who has the selective reading problem.  It is the IPCC and the rest of the AGWers who are neglecting the negative feedbacks and the evidence surface temperatures are artificially warm. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 13:00, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
6785 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6784 +++$+++ 6784 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.188158760E09 +++$+++ Stephan, if climate was as sensitive to CO2 as Annan thinks, the upper tropical troposphere would show the greatest warming.  Check out this image. [http:\/\/davidsmith.auditblogs.com\/files\/2007\/08\/0821071.JPG]  I just do not see any evidence of CO2 being a primary driver of anything here.  +++$+++ :Stephan, if climate was as sensitive to CO2 as Annan thinks, the upper tropical troposphere would show the greatest warming.  Check out this image. [http://davidsmith.auditblogs.com/files/2007/08/0821071.JPG]  I just do not see any evidence of CO2 being a primary driver of anything here. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 13:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

531073 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531073 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-22 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.274594340E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Many thanks for your work with Wisconsin related articles- +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Many thanks for your work with Wisconsin related articles-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 22:59, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
531074 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531073 +++$+++ 531073 +++$+++ 2010-05-23 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.274648700E09 +++$+++ I do handed them out but until now they limited to WikiProject Wisconsin-Many thanks- +++$+++ :I do handed them out but until now they limited to WikiProject Wisconsin-Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 14:05, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

532513 +++$+++ Bormalagurski +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532513 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-11 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.147334220E09 +++$+++ I just noticed your user page after you voted ''Keep'' at the El condor pada deletion page, and I counted the number of places you visited and it's exactly the same number of countries I've visited! Wierd, eh? I'm from Serbia and I used to travel a lot untill I moved to Canada, where people only go to the U.S. and France for the summer. Well, I'd like to talk to you about your travel experiences, especially Egypt and Sweden, I'd love to go there one day :-) [http:\/\/sr.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:%D0%91%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B3%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8#.D0.A1.D0.BF.D0.B8.D1.81.D0.B0.D0.BA_.D0.B4.D1.80.D0.B6.D0.B0.D0.B2.D0.B0_.D1.83_.D0.BA.D0.BE.D1.98.D0.B8.D0.BC.D0.B0_.D1.81.D0.B0.D0.BC_.D0.B1.D0.B8.D0.BE Here] is a list of countries I've been to, I'd like to share my experiences about a few countries, if you're interested. All the best, -- +++$+++ I just noticed your user page after you voted ''Keep'' at the El condor pada deletion page, and I counted the number of places you visited and it's exactly the same number of countries I've visited! Wierd, eh? I'm from Serbia and I used to travel a lot untill I moved to Canada, where people only go to the U.S. and France for the summer. Well, I'd like to talk to you about your travel experiences, especially Egypt and Sweden, I'd love to go there one day :-) [http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:%D0%91%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B3%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8#.D0.A1.D0.BF.D0.B8.D1.81.D0.B0.D0.BA_.D0.B4.D1.80.D0.B6.D0.B0.D0.B2.D0.B0_.D1.83_.D0.BA.D0.BE.D1.98.D0.B8.D0.BC.D0.B0_.D1.81.D0.B0.D0.BC_.D0.B1.D0.B8.D0.BE Here] is a list of countries I've been to, I'd like to share my experiences about a few countries, if you're interested. All the best, --[[User:Bormalagurski|<font color="#003399">'''serbiana'''</font>]] [[Yugoslavia|'''-''']] [[User_talk:Bormalagurski|<font color="#A61022">'''talk'''</font>]] 00:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
532514 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532513 +++$+++ 532513 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.147372620E09 +++$+++ Hi. Seems we both like traveling. Yeah, Egypt and Sweden have both been great experiences... I must go to North America some day also :-) I am planning some longer travels before I graduate. If you have any questions, I will be glad to answer. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : Hi. Seems we both like traveling. Yeah, Egypt and Sweden have both been great experiences... I must go to North America some day also :-) I am planning some longer travels before I graduate. If you have any questions, I will be glad to answer. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 11:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

6787 +++$+++ Nethgirb +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-02 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.188797580E09 +++$+++ Hi Ron, just wanted to thank you for taking my joke in stride [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlobal_warming_controversy&diff=155222224&oldid=155179791].  I appreciate that you can keep your cool. Now back to battling it out on the talk page. :-) -- +++$+++ Hi Ron, just wanted to thank you for taking my joke in stride [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlobal_warming_controversy&diff=155222224&oldid=155179791].  I appreciate that you can keep your cool. Now back to battling it out on the talk page. :-) --[[User:Nethgirb|Nethgirb]] 22:33, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
6788 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6787 +++$+++ 6787 +++$+++ 2007-09-02 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.188801240E09 +++$+++ Hi Nethgirb. I have a fairly good sense of humor.  BTW, you know the example I gave works.:)  +++$+++ :Hi Nethgirb. I have a fairly good sense of humor.  BTW, you know the example I gave works.:) [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 23:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

268932 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-14 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.229319840E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, thanks a lot for your support over at DYK.  On an unrelated note, I was just wondering... I'm working on slowly expanding the [[Neurolinguistics]] article, keeping GA in the back of my mind, but I'm concerned over the fact that right now almost all of my sources are from within the neurolinguistics literature&mdash;journal articles and chapters of edited volumes, rather than like reader-friendly intros and websites.  (I can't blame anyone else for that; they're all sources that I put in the article, since the article didn't have sources when I first started working on it.)  So one concern is that most of the refs are offline; I might be able to alleviate that by tracking down links to at least the free previews of most of these articles, but that still leaves the other problem, which is that they are not really \"mainstream,\" and some reviewers might consider them primary sources.  I guess at some point I can do some googling and just look for random websites to add to the sources, but it's hard for me to trust any of that stuff since this is what I study and these sources are the literature I'm most familiar with.  At some point I think I'll need to grab some non-specialist editor and ask him\/her to help me out by reading through the article and telling me what parts are too jargon-y or otherwise not clear.  In the meantime, though, I was just wondering if you could clarify for me how much of a problem the current sources are (or will be, whenever this eventually goes to GAN).  Thanks, &mdash; +++$+++ Mattisse, thanks a lot for your support over at DYK.  On an unrelated note, I was just wondering... I'm working on slowly expanding the [[Neurolinguistics]] article, keeping GA in the back of my mind, but I'm concerned over the fact that right now almost all of my sources are from within the neurolinguistics literature&mdash;journal articles and chapters of edited volumes, rather than like reader-friendly intros and websites.  (I can't blame anyone else for that; they're all sources that I put in the article, since the article didn't have sources when I first started working on it.)  So one concern is that most of the refs are offline; I might be able to alleviate that by tracking down links to at least the free previews of most of these articles, but that still leaves the other problem, which is that they are not really "mainstream," and some reviewers might consider them primary sources.  I guess at some point I can do some googling and just look for random websites to add to the sources, but it's hard for me to trust any of that stuff since this is what I study and these sources are the literature I'm most familiar with.  At some point I think I'll need to grab some non-specialist editor and ask him/her to help me out by reading through the article and telling me what parts are too jargon-y or otherwise not clear.  In the meantime, though, I was just wondering if you could clarify for me how much of a problem the current sources are (or will be, whenever this eventually goes to GAN).  Thanks, &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 21:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
268933 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268932 +++$+++ 268932 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.229322000E09 +++$+++ OK. I'm looking at it now and checking out the references. This is not an area I have expertise in, but it looks legitimate. I put the citation bot on it, so the doi links will make examining the references easier and also finding new ones.  Happy to help you out on this, as I have been distracted by various shenanigans of late and appreciate something else to focus on!  &mdash; +++$+++ :OK. I'm looking at it now and checking out the references. This is not an area I have expertise in, but it looks legitimate. I put the citation bot on it, so the doi links will make examining the references easier and also finding new ones.  Happy to help you out on this, as I have been distracted by various shenanigans of late and appreciate something else to focus on!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
268934 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268932 +++$+++ 268933 +++$+++ 2008-12-15 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.229328720E09 +++$+++ I noticed the citation bot's edit; thanks for that!  That completed in one fell swoop about 75% of what I thought I was gonna have to slave over for hours! &mdash; +++$+++ ::I noticed the citation bot's edit; thanks for that!  That completed in one fell swoop about 75% of what I thought I was gonna have to slave over for hours! &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 00:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

6789 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.189807860E09 +++$+++ Ron you could actually have gotten over 3RR there (which was why i wrote the comment) - your first insertion of the Pielke item is a revert of earlier.... (i had forgotten that it was more than 24 hours ago). I just wanted to state that i wasn't [[WP:AGF|assuming bad faith]]. It was meant friendly. -- +++$+++ Ron you could actually have gotten over 3RR there (which was why i wrote the comment) - your first insertion of the Pielke item is a revert of earlier.... (i had forgotten that it was more than 24 hours ago). I just wanted to state that i wasn't [[WP:AGF|assuming bad faith]]. It was meant friendly. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] 15:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
6790 +++$+++ Tillman +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6789 +++$+++ 6789 +++$+++ 2008-01-19 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.200799140E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ :Cheers, [[User:Tillman|Pete Tillman]] ([[User talk:Tillman|talk]]) 19:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
6791 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6789 +++$+++ 6790 +++$+++ 2008-01-19 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.200809280E09 +++$+++ And while Ron and i have \"clashed\" quite a few times, with differing opinions - i don't think that any of us have any animosity towards each other.-- +++$+++ ::And while Ron and i have "clashed" quite a few times, with differing opinions - i don't think that any of us have any animosity towards each other.--[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 22:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

531078 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531078 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-31 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.275375480E09 +++$+++ I found a citation for [[Hollandtown, Wisconsin]] in Brown County but it is under the name of Holland. This is also the same in the DeLorme atlas. However, it is the same community. I don't know if you want to add a sentence to clarify that this community can be known as Holland or Hollandtown. Many thanks- +++$+++ I found a citation for [[Hollandtown, Wisconsin]] in Brown County but it is under the name of Holland. This is also the same in the DeLorme atlas. However, it is the same community. I don't know if you want to add a sentence to clarify that this community can be known as Holland or Hollandtown. Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 23:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
531079 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531078 +++$+++ 531078 +++$+++ 2010-06-01 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.275423420E09 +++$+++ Many thanks- +++$+++ :Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

268935 +++$+++ Stanistani +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-16 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.229433420E09 +++$+++ I'm a novice editor (have been working on fixing typos mostly), and I have decided to expand the stub article you created during my holiday next week. I'd appreciate it if you could keep the page on your watchlist, and advise me if I put a foot in the wrong place while I'm expanding the article and placing citations and references. Thanks! --''''' +++$+++ I'm a novice editor (have been working on fixing typos mostly), and I have decided to expand the stub article you created during my holiday next week. I'd appreciate it if you could keep the page on your watchlist, and advise me if I put a foot in the wrong place while I'm expanding the article and placing citations and references. Thanks! --'''''[[User:Stanistani|<font color="green">Stani</font>]][[User talk:Stanistani|<font color="blue">Stani</font>]]''''' 05:17, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
268936 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268935 +++$+++ 268935 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.229434080E09 +++$+++ I didn't create that article, but I am certainly willing to help you out in any way I can. I don't know much about the subject, but I will put the article on my watchlist. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I didn't create that article, but I am certainly willing to help you out in any way I can. I don't know much about the subject, but I will put the article on my watchlist. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 05:28, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
268937 +++$+++ Stanistani +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268935 +++$+++ 268936 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.229440560E09 +++$+++ The edit history was unclear, at least to my eye. I appreciate the help. I've been fiddling with the Wiki code, and it's time for me to contribute in article space. --''''' +++$+++ ::The edit history was unclear, at least to my eye. I appreciate the help. I've been fiddling with the Wiki code, and it's time for me to contribute in article space. --'''''[[User:Stanistani|<font color="green">Stani</font>]][[User talk:Stanistani|<font color="blue">Stani</font>]]''''' 07:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
268938 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268935 +++$+++ 268937 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.229440860E09 +++$+++ What part of the Wiki code are you having trouble with? &mdash; +++$+++ :::What part of the Wiki code are you having trouble with? &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 07:21, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
268939 +++$+++ Stanistani +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268935 +++$+++ 268938 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.229446980E09 +++$+++ Not having trouble with code, just need more experience in markup and citation work, so decided to work on a live article, and picked a stub with no controversy. I admire the work you've done in main article space. --''''' +++$+++ ::::Not having trouble with code, just need more experience in markup and citation work, so decided to work on a live article, and picked a stub with no controversy. I admire the work you've done in main article space. --'''''[[User:Stanistani|<font color="green">Stani</font>]][[User talk:Stanistani|<font color="blue">Stani</font>]]''''' 09:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

6792 +++$+++ Brusegadi +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-30 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.191212100E09 +++$+++ Hello, the first [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Global_warming_controversy&diff=160361224&oldid=160360858 diff] and the second [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Global_warming_controversy&diff=160822707&oldid=160817266 one].  Those talk pages can get long and following everything is hard!  Good day,  +++$+++ Hello, the first [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Global_warming_controversy&diff=160361224&oldid=160360858 diff] and the second [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Global_warming_controversy&diff=160822707&oldid=160817266 one].  Those talk pages can get long and following everything is hard!  Good day, [[User:Brusegadi|Brusegadi]] 21:15, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
6793 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6792 +++$+++ 6792 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.191222660E09 +++$+++ Thank you for providing the link.  It does say \"custumarily given\" but it also says \"However, not all retiring persons receive that rank.\"  This is my point.  Not every retiring prof is an Emeritus Professor.  It seems as though Brown is a little looser with the title than the universities I have been associated with, the title is not granted universally.  It is a title of honor.  +++$+++ :Thank you for providing the link.  It does say "custumarily given" but it also says "However, not all retiring persons receive that rank."  This is my point.  Not every retiring prof is an Emeritus Professor.  It seems as though Brown is a little looser with the title than the universities I have been associated with, the title is not granted universally.  It is a title of honor. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] 00:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
6794 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6792 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.191224460E09 +++$+++ Indeed the practice does vary. Nonetheless, you should email those clueless rubes at Harvard[http:\/\/www.gsd.harvard.edu\/academic\/faculty_resources\/appointment_handbook\/appointment_to_faculty.html], MIT[http:\/\/web.mit.edu\/policies\/2.3.html], Stanford[http:\/\/facultyhandbook.stanford.edu\/ch2.html], etc. and tell them they've got it all wrong about this emeritus thing, and that they need to correct their faculty handbooks pronto. No doubt they'll appreciate it.  +++$+++ :::Indeed the practice does vary. Nonetheless, you should email those clueless rubes at Harvard[http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/academic/faculty_resources/appointment_handbook/appointment_to_faculty.html], MIT[http://web.mit.edu/policies/2.3.html], Stanford[http://facultyhandbook.stanford.edu/ch2.html], etc. and tell them they've got it all wrong about this emeritus thing, and that they need to correct their faculty handbooks pronto. No doubt they'll appreciate it. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] 00:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
6795 +++$+++ Brusegadi +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6792 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.191236460E09 +++$+++ I dont think the practice varies as much as the formality with which these rules are written.  At least at Brown, customary means that it always happens, the wording is the usual contract clause design to create an umbrella under which all else falls.  If you read the link provided to for Brown, you will see that at some point, even before the definition of Emeritus, the term is used interchangeably with retired...  +++$+++ ::::I dont think the practice varies as much as the formality with which these rules are written.  At least at Brown, customary means that it always happens, the wording is the usual contract clause design to create an umbrella under which all else falls.  If you read the link provided to for Brown, you will see that at some point, even before the definition of Emeritus, the term is used interchangeably with retired... [[User:Brusegadi|Brusegadi]] 04:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

531081 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-10 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.276211640E09 +++$+++ If you're not busy, I would like you to give me so advice to see how I can fix the article. If you have the time to do a [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/2010 Auto Club 500\/archive1|peer review]] that would also be very helpful. Thanks. --''' +++$+++ If you're not busy, I would like you to give me so advice to see how I can fix the article. If you have the time to do a [[Wikipedia:Peer review/2010 Auto Club 500/archive1|peer review]] that would also be very helpful. Thanks. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 16:14, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
531082 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531081 +++$+++ 531081 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.276217880E09 +++$+++ Also, I would like to review Good Article Nominations, but I have been confused and would like to hear some advice. Thanks. --''' +++$+++ :Also, I would like to review Good Article Nominations, but I have been confused and would like to hear some advice. Thanks. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' 17:58, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

531083 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531083 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-10 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.276214640E09 +++$+++ I like the article and photos about [[Calvary, Wisconsin]]-Hope you are well-Thanks- +++$+++ I like the article and photos about [[Calvary, Wisconsin]]-Hope you are well-Thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 17:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
531084 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531083 +++$+++ 531083 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.276236480E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'm glad to see that your patience during that long wait was worth the while! I hope that you are well, too! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thanks, I'm glad to see that your patience during that long wait was worth the while! I hope that you are well, too! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

268941 +++$+++ Dusti +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268941 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-16 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.229482080E09 +++$+++ When I was more active on Wikipedia, I don't know how many requests I submitted to [[WP:AIV|AIV]]. It helped me learn more about the blocking system and how the sysops will work when blocking. Realize that a user must receive three warnings in one day for general vandalism. Only rarely when large amounts of text are deleted at once and it appears the user is on a rampage will a sysop block without ample warnings given. Hope this helps for future reference :) <font face=\"Segoe script\"> +++$+++ When I was more active on Wikipedia, I don't know how many requests I submitted to [[WP:AIV|AIV]]. It helped me learn more about the blocking system and how the sysops will work when blocking. Realize that a user must receive three warnings in one day for general vandalism. Only rarely when large amounts of text are deleted at once and it appears the user is on a rampage will a sysop block without ample warnings given. Hope this helps for future reference :) <font face="Segoe script">[[User:Dusti|'''<font color="#ff0000">D</font><font color="#ff6600">u</font><font color="#009900">s</font><font color="#0000ff">t</font><font color="#6600cc">i</font>''']][[User talk:Dusti|<sup>SPEAK!!</sup>]]</font> 18:48, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
268942 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268941 +++$+++ 268941 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.229482260E09 +++$+++ The warning are misleading in the rollbacks  then. I will not bother anymore. I am nowhere near willing to spend that amount of time as you are suggesting to become sophisticated enough to manage a successful report! I try to protect certain articles but I can see that reporting will be a useless waste of time for me.   Thanks for your reply. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :The warning are misleading in the rollbacks  then. I will not bother anymore. I am nowhere near willing to spend that amount of time as you are suggesting to become sophisticated enough to manage a successful report! I try to protect certain articles but I can see that reporting will be a useless waste of time for me.   Thanks for your reply. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:51, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
268943 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268941 +++$+++ 268942 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.229482440E09 +++$+++ A vandal account doesn't have to have been warned three times in one day;  persistent vandalism across multiple days is also grounds for a block, as long as the vandal account has been warned sufficiently.  +++$+++ ::A vandal account doesn't have to have been warned three times in one day;  persistent vandalism across multiple days is also grounds for a block, as long as the vandal account has been warned sufficiently. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 18:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
268944 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268941 +++$+++ 268943 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.229483460E09 +++$+++ Well, the vandal, [[User talk:207.28.249.114]] had received 6 warnings in December 2008, including 2 final warnings, but my report was turned down for the reasons above, for  vandalism, including <span class=\"plainlinks\">[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Crab&diff=prev&oldid=258379629 1], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Crab&diff=prev&oldid=258379326 2], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ben_L._Jones&diff=prev&oldid=257553014 3], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Nematode&diff=prev&oldid=257324814 4], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mike_Tyson&diff=prev&oldid=257317525 5], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mark_Spitz&diff=prev&oldid=255699907 6] <\/span> So, I think all of this is over my head. I'll leave it to others who can figure it out!  Thanks, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Well, the vandal, [[User talk:207.28.249.114]] had received 6 warnings in December 2008, including 2 final warnings, but my report was turned down for the reasons above, for  vandalism, including <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crab&diff=prev&oldid=258379629 1], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crab&diff=prev&oldid=258379326 2], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ben_L._Jones&diff=prev&oldid=257553014 3], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nematode&diff=prev&oldid=257324814 4], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mike_Tyson&diff=prev&oldid=257317525 5], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Spitz&diff=prev&oldid=255699907 6] </span> So, I think all of this is over my head. I'll leave it to others who can figure it out!  Thanks, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
268945 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268941 +++$+++ 268943 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.229484900E09 +++$+++ Usually it is better to have the warnings on consecutive days (6 warnings in 3 days would be plenty of notice); otherwise we run the risk of the IP having changed \"owners\", and this particular owner not having gotten the warnings before.  It's a tricky process; it's okay to keep filing AIV reports and let the admins act on them when they think it is time.  +++$+++ :::Usually it is better to have the warnings on consecutive days (6 warnings in 3 days would be plenty of notice); otherwise we run the risk of the IP having changed "owners", and this particular owner not having gotten the warnings before.  It's a tricky process; it's okay to keep filing AIV reports and let the admins act on them when they think it is time. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 19:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
268946 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268941 +++$+++ 268945 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.229485320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the info. Since I forgot to unwatch the vandal user page, I just notices that he was blocked after all after my report. So, its confusing.  I think vandal reporting is not my strong suit. Thanks for clarifying. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Thanks for the info. Since I forgot to unwatch the vandal user page, I just notices that he was blocked after all after my report. So, its confusing.  I think vandal reporting is not my strong suit. Thanks for clarifying. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:42, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

6798 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-16 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.208397840E09 +++$+++ \"Your repeating the claim they are not competent is not valid '''and you know it.'''\"[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlobal_warming_controversy&diff=206024356&oldid=206013821] That's an accusation of premeditated lying. You've pulled this kind of nonsense too many times and need to be held to account for it.  +++$+++ "Your repeating the claim they are not competent is not valid '''and you know it.'''"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlobal_warming_controversy&diff=206024356&oldid=206013821] That's an accusation of premeditated lying. You've pulled this kind of nonsense too many times and need to be held to account for it. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] ([[User talk:Raymond arritt|talk]]) 19:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
6799 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6798 +++$+++ 6798 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.208400780E09 +++$+++ Raymond, I apologize if you took it to mean I was accusing you of lying.  I was not.  I was accusing you of double-think.  You were attempting to discredit A&G even though you know full well he is the founding editor of two scientific journals on forecasting and that his book is used as a textbook on the subject. I believe if you had thought to produce evidence to convince me he is incompetent, you would have had to confront your own double-think.  For that reason, you chose to avoid attempting to show any evidence and went with the bald and unsupported assertion.  My comment that you know he is competent was my effort to make you confront the evidence of his expertise.  +++$+++ :Raymond, I apologize if you took it to mean I was accusing you of lying.  I was not.  I was accusing you of double-think.  You were attempting to discredit A&G even though you know full well he is the founding editor of two scientific journals on forecasting and that his book is used as a textbook on the subject. I believe if you had thought to produce evidence to convince me he is incompetent, you would have had to confront your own double-think.  For that reason, you chose to avoid attempting to show any evidence and went with the bald and unsupported assertion.  My comment that you know he is competent was my effort to make you confront the evidence of his expertise. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 19:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
6800 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6798 +++$+++ 6799 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.208403480E09 +++$+++ Accusing someone of \"double-think\" is no better than accusing them of lying (see [[Non-apology apology]]). I will no longer address any point that you raise, since you refuse to extend the assumption of good faith.  +++$+++ ::Accusing someone of "double-think" is no better than accusing them of lying (see [[Non-apology apology]]). I will no longer address any point that you raise, since you refuse to extend the assumption of good faith. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] ([[User talk:Raymond arritt|talk]]) 20:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
6801 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6798 +++$+++ 6800 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.208403900E09 +++$+++ \"Double-think\" is a fact of the human condition.  We are all guilty of it on occasion. It is not a moral issue or an issue of bad faith. For you to be offended that I \"accused\" you of it is almost comical. I invite you to call me on it whenever you see me doing the same thing.  +++$+++ :::"Double-think" is a fact of the human condition.  We are all guilty of it on occasion. It is not a moral issue or an issue of bad faith. For you to be offended that I "accused" you of it is almost comical. I invite you to call me on it whenever you see me doing the same thing. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 20:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
6802 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6798 +++$+++ 6801 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.208405040E09 +++$+++ It doesn't matter whether you aren't offended by being called a liar (or double-thinker). What matters here is that you just accused ''someone else'' of being it. It makes the same logical sense as: \"I personally don't mind being called an asshole - so i often call other people assholes\". -- +++$+++ ::::It doesn't matter whether you aren't offended by being called a liar (or double-thinker). What matters here is that you just accused ''someone else'' of being it. It makes the same logical sense as: "I personally don't mind being called an asshole - so i often call other people assholes". --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 21:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
6803 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6798 +++$+++ 6802 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.208407140E09 +++$+++ Kim, you are being non-sensical.  Being called a \"double-thinker,\" as you put it, is equivalent of a man being called a \"man\" or a woman being called a \"woman.\"  There is nothing insulting about it. We ALL, at times, hold two contrary views at the same time.  We are all double-thinkers whether you like the idea or not.  It has nothing to do with the intelligence of a person or whether or not they are acting in bad faith.  It means they have not yet recognized and resolved the situation in their own minds.  Raymond's refusal to address the situation is a textbook example of double-think.  He is seeking to avoid the confrontation of the two conflicting views.  Since I insisted he confront them, he has decided to avoid me as well.  If you have not studied double-think in the past, you should.  I think you would find it very enlightening.  And so would William.  +++$+++ :::::Kim, you are being non-sensical.  Being called a "double-thinker," as you put it, is equivalent of a man being called a "man" or a woman being called a "woman."  There is nothing insulting about it. We ALL, at times, hold two contrary views at the same time.  We are all double-thinkers whether you like the idea or not.  It has nothing to do with the intelligence of a person or whether or not they are acting in bad faith.  It means they have not yet recognized and resolved the situation in their own minds.  Raymond's refusal to address the situation is a textbook example of double-think.  He is seeking to avoid the confrontation of the two conflicting views.  Since I insisted he confront them, he has decided to avoid me as well.  If you have not studied double-think in the past, you should.  I think you would find it very enlightening.  And so would William. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 21:39, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
6804 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6798 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.208407500E09 +++$+++ And you are continuing on the same line.... (sigh). Try fixing this simple concept in your head: Don't call people double-thinkers unless you yourself can be absolutely 100% sure that you are not guilty of the same thing. And if you really are 100% sure - then I can assure you that you are almost 100% certain of being wrong. (and yes i know the psychological concept).  -- +++$+++ :::::::And you are continuing on the same line.... (sigh). Try fixing this simple concept in your head: Don't call people double-thinkers unless you yourself can be absolutely 100% sure that you are not guilty of the same thing. And if you really are 100% sure - then I can assure you that you are almost 100% certain of being wrong. (and yes i know the psychological concept).  --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 21:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
6805 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6798 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.208409000E09 +++$+++ Kim, you are missing the point entirely.  I'm not sure how that is happening.  You write: ''Don't call people double-thinkers unless you yourself can be absolutely 100% sure that you are not guilty of the same thing.''  But that is the point.  I am a double-thinker.  I catch myself at it occasionally.  And other times other people catch me at it.  That is the point.  We are ALL double-thinkers, at times.  I'm not sure how this concept is confusing you. At any rate, being a double-thinker is not a moral issue or bad faith.  It is, however, something people need the courage to confront in themselves. It is not always easy.  +++$+++ ::::::::Kim, you are missing the point entirely.  I'm not sure how that is happening.  You write: ''Don't call people double-thinkers unless you yourself can be absolutely 100% sure that you are not guilty of the same thing.''  But that is the point.  I am a double-thinker.  I catch myself at it occasionally.  And other times other people catch me at it.  That is the point.  We are ALL double-thinkers, at times.  I'm not sure how this concept is confusing you. At any rate, being a double-thinker is not a moral issue or bad faith.  It is, however, something people need the courage to confront in themselves. It is not always easy. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 22:10, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
6806 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6798 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.208410200E09 +++$+++ No matter how you slice or dice it. Either you are outright calling people liars or you are saying that they are lying to themselves (and not being intelligent enough to catch it). Thats [[WP:CIV|downright rude and uncivil]]. -- +++$+++ :::::::::No matter how you slice or dice it. Either you are outright calling people liars or you are saying that they are lying to themselves (and not being intelligent enough to catch it). Thats [[WP:CIV|downright rude and uncivil]]. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 22:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
6807 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6798 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.208413680E09 +++$+++ Ron, you are double-thinking. And trying to explain it away. -- +++$+++ :::::::::::Ron, you are double-thinking. And trying to explain it away. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 23:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
6808 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6798 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-17 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.208418120E09 +++$+++ Kim, you have made the claim that I am double thinking but you have not identified what two views I hold that are contrary to each other.  For that reason, I have not tried to explain my behavior at all.  My last post was to explain to you what double think looks like using Raymond as a textbook example.   +++$+++ ::::::::::::Kim, you have made the claim that I am double thinking but you have not identified what two views I hold that are contrary to each other.  For that reason, I have not tried to explain my behavior at all.  My last post was to explain to you what double think looks like using Raymond as a textbook example.  [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 00:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

531087 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-14 11:23:00 +++$+++ 1.276539780E09 +++$+++ The article on [[Mail jumping]] was an interesting article. As always you did an excellent job with the research and writing. One other item-I put in a request for photos for the article about the Shrine of Our Lady of Good Hope in [[Champion, Wisconsin]]. Bishop Ricken set up some diocesan commission to investigate the visions Sister Adele had of the Blessed Virgin Mary-this will be interesting-Many thanks- +++$+++ The article on [[Mail jumping]] was an interesting article. As always you did an excellent job with the research and writing. One other item-I put in a request for photos for the article about the Shrine of Our Lady of Good Hope in [[Champion, Wisconsin]]. Bishop Ricken set up some diocesan commission to investigate the visions Sister Adele had of the Blessed Virgin Mary-this will be interesting-Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 11:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
531088 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531087 +++$+++ 531087 +++$+++ 2010-06-15 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.276596360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the compliment! [[Mail jumping]] did work out well. There's lots of interest in the topic by national media since it is so unusual. I do still remember telling you that I'll photograph that shrine, good idea to put out the photograph request. I told my family about the shrine and we're all interested. So hopefully the next time that we go to Door County we'll catch it while going through Green Bay. I'd like to pick cherries in August, talk about fond memories! Bishop Ricken sure is the best bishop compared to the last many nationally-known ones that have come through Green Bay on their way to becoming archbishops\/cardinals. He's really working to keep parishes open instead of closing everything and throwing communities into chaos like what happened with my original home parish. He's a real down-to-earth people person instead of an [[Aristocracy|aristocrat]]. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for the compliment! [[Mail jumping]] did work out well. There's lots of interest in the topic by national media since it is so unusual. I do still remember telling you that I'll photograph that shrine, good idea to put out the photograph request. I told my family about the shrine and we're all interested. So hopefully the next time that we go to Door County we'll catch it while going through Green Bay. I'd like to pick cherries in August, talk about fond memories! Bishop Ricken sure is the best bishop compared to the last many nationally-known ones that have come through Green Bay on their way to becoming archbishops/cardinals. He's really working to keep parishes open instead of closing everything and throwing communities into chaos like what happened with my original home parish. He's a real down-to-earth people person instead of an [[Aristocracy|aristocrat]]. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
531089 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531087 +++$+++ 531087 +++$+++ 2010-06-15 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.276626420E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your response-on the subject of bishops my diocese-La Crosse-is getting a new bishop Bishop Callahan-from Milwaukee- +++$+++ :Many thanks for your response-on the subject of bishops my diocese-La Crosse-is getting a new bishop Bishop Callahan-from Milwaukee-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 11:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

531090 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-19 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.276952580E09 +++$+++ }}  -- ''' +++$+++ }}  -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 06:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
531091 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531090 +++$+++ 531090 +++$+++ 2010-06-19 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.276999440E09 +++$+++ Congratulations- +++$+++ :Congratulations-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 19:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

268947 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-17 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.229504520E09 +++$+++ Anyway, that's all I can think of right now...we're still working on trying to make the template more user-friendly, so hopefully things will improve soon.  If you ever have any questions about how stuff works, don't hesitate to ask!  And I can give you a quick tutorial in my sandbox about how to use the template and stuff, if you'd like (although it's only optional, and if you feel more comfortable just doing stuff by hand, old-school, that's perfectly acceptable too).  &mdash; +++$+++ Anyway, that's all I can think of right now...we're still working on trying to make the template more user-friendly, so hopefully things will improve soon.  If you ever have any questions about how stuff works, don't hesitate to ask!  And I can give you a quick tutorial in my sandbox about how to use the template and stuff, if you'd like (although it's only optional, and if you feel more comfortable just doing stuff by hand, old-school, that's perfectly acceptable too).  &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 01:02, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
268948 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268947 +++$+++ 268947 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.229506740E09 +++$+++ I see you have been working on the [[Neurolinguistics]] article. The article already seems much improved.  (I only knew a little about [[Transcranial magnetic stimulation]] as it is effective in some recalcitrant [[Major depressive disorder]]s). I noticed that you are thinking about doing a \"spinout\" of the experimental design section. I am very much interested in experimental design in general and have been thinking about trying to write or upgrade some of the articles on statistics and experimental design in a way that is understandable to the lay person. Such articles  would be helpful  for wikilinking to in scientific articles, as there seems to be a general misunderstanding about the scientific method vs. \"truth\" on Wikipedia! Thanks again for your response. &mdash; +++$+++ :I see you have been working on the [[Neurolinguistics]] article. The article already seems much improved.  (I only knew a little about [[Transcranial magnetic stimulation]] as it is effective in some recalcitrant [[Major depressive disorder]]s). I noticed that you are thinking about doing a "spinout" of the experimental design section. I am very much interested in experimental design in general and have been thinking about trying to write or upgrade some of the articles on statistics and experimental design in a way that is understandable to the lay person. Such articles  would be helpful  for wikilinking to in scientific articles, as there seems to be a general misunderstanding about the scientific method vs. "truth" on Wikipedia! Thanks again for your response. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
268949 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268947 +++$+++ 268948 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.229508060E09 +++$+++ I think having experimental design articles is a good idea.  In this neurolinguistics article, for example, it's hard to know how much to write about because it's sort of straddling the border between linguistics and experimental science...a lot of the stuff is just about brain imaging and stuff like that, which some might argue is more appropriate in a more general article than in this...but, on the other hand, the imaging techniques and experimental designs are geared towards measuring language-related stuff rather than something else, so it has its own linguistic flavor to it (for example, there's all kinds of special experimental design stuff people do to have fMRI studies of language, since the MRI machine makes so much banging, which can really mess with trying to measure auditory processing of language..... plus, a lot of the \"subject tasks\" written about in the article right now, such as acceptability judgments and probe verification, are mostly just to keep the subject from getting bored and to make sure they're reading\/listening attentively, which is probably not as big a deal in some other fields)&mdash;so it's not purely about linguistics, and not purely about scientific methodology.  Which is why it would be nice to have a series of articles on experimental design in various fields...then we wouldn't have to worry about going into too much or too little detail (ie, the worry of people coming to the neurolinguistics article and thinking \"I care about language bla bla bla stuff, not about how the stupid MEG machine works!\") and can try to find a better balance between the experimental techniques and the field-specific subject matter.  For example, I wouldn't be able to say much about most fields, but I could do a bit in stuff like [[Experimental design in neurolinguistics]] and [[Experimental design in acoustic phonetics]]...people who know about stuff like physics and biology and medicine and other fields would be able to do \"Experimental design in X\" articles for that, etc...  and in the end, we could put them all in a category! &mdash; +++$+++ ::I think having experimental design articles is a good idea.  In this neurolinguistics article, for example, it's hard to know how much to write about because it's sort of straddling the border between linguistics and experimental science...a lot of the stuff is just about brain imaging and stuff like that, which some might argue is more appropriate in a more general article than in this...but, on the other hand, the imaging techniques and experimental designs are geared towards measuring language-related stuff rather than something else, so it has its own linguistic flavor to it (for example, there's all kinds of special experimental design stuff people do to have fMRI studies of language, since the MRI machine makes so much banging, which can really mess with trying to measure auditory processing of language..... plus, a lot of the "subject tasks" written about in the article right now, such as acceptability judgments and probe verification, are mostly just to keep the subject from getting bored and to make sure they're reading/listening attentively, which is probably not as big a deal in some other fields)&mdash;so it's not purely about linguistics, and not purely about scientific methodology.  Which is why it would be nice to have a series of articles on experimental design in various fields...then we wouldn't have to worry about going into too much or too little detail (ie, the worry of people coming to the neurolinguistics article and thinking "I care about language bla bla bla stuff, not about how the stupid MEG machine works!") and can try to find a better balance between the experimental techniques and the field-specific subject matter.  For example, I wouldn't be able to say much about most fields, but I could do a bit in stuff like [[Experimental design in neurolinguistics]] and [[Experimental design in acoustic phonetics]]...people who know about stuff like physics and biology and medicine and other fields would be able to do "Experimental design in X" articles for that, etc...  and in the end, we could put them all in a category! &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 02:01, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
268950 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268947 +++$+++ 268949 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.229509800E09 +++$+++ I have noticed in doing FAC and GA reviews, that some subject areas, like [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones]] etc. have developed a bunch of sub articles describing related technical terms, so that when they write an article, rather than having to describe these terms in the article, they can just wikilink. I developed many such little articles for the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Law]] and some for the India-related articles. I am thinking of doing something similar for science-related terms, those related to methodology and statistics, so in writing these article wikilinking could explain some of the rationale behind the scientific method and decision-making. &mdash; +++$+++ :::I have noticed in doing FAC and GA reviews, that some subject areas, like [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones]] etc. have developed a bunch of sub articles describing related technical terms, so that when they write an article, rather than having to describe these terms in the article, they can just wikilink. I developed many such little articles for the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Law]] and some for the India-related articles. I am thinking of doing something similar for science-related terms, those related to methodology and statistics, so in writing these article wikilinking could explain some of the rationale behind the scientific method and decision-making. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:30, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

531092 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-20 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.277033040E09 +++$+++ Hello, you might be interested in assess these [[:Category:Unassessed NASCAR articles|articles]]. Please note that as of June 20th, there were 193 articles unassessed. Thanks. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: blue\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>( +++$+++ Hello, you might be interested in assess these [[:Category:Unassessed NASCAR articles|articles]]. Please note that as of June 20th, there were 193 articles unassessed. Thanks. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' <sup>([[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook|sign]])</sup> 04:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
531093 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531092 +++$+++ 531092 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.277033640E09 +++$+++ PLEASE - start a new thread instead of making dig back in the archives. You keep adding new topics to an old topic. It will make archiving much harder and I hate having to scroll back through to try to find some old section. So I moved it to its own section. I've known about assessment for years, I rarely assess. Others used to do it, I've always rather spend time improve an article instead of spending time with assessment. Right now I'm looking through all of the images that I got today at the Road America Nationwide race. I had a great time, interesting race. Like the MRN announcers said, the fans were either NASCAR fans or fans of the track. I'm both! I used the telephoto on my camera & got decent shots of most drivers. So there'll be a large influx of images for both the drivers and their cars. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :PLEASE - start a new thread instead of making dig back in the archives. You keep adding new topics to an old topic. It will make archiving much harder and I hate having to scroll back through to try to find some old section. So I moved it to its own section. I've known about assessment for years, I rarely assess. Others used to do it, I've always rather spend time improve an article instead of spending time with assessment. Right now I'm looking through all of the images that I got today at the Road America Nationwide race. I had a great time, interesting race. Like the MRN announcers said, the fans were either NASCAR fans or fans of the track. I'm both! I used the telephoto on my camera & got decent shots of most drivers. So there'll be a large influx of images for both the drivers and their cars. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:34, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
531094 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531092 +++$+++ 531093 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.277033820E09 +++$+++ I watched it on television; I'm not that much of a road course fan, but the race was pretty good. Okay, for some reason I just rather put it in the old; I guess its where my talk page is so short. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: blue\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>( +++$+++ ::I watched it on television; I'm not that much of a road course fan, but the race was pretty good. Okay, for some reason I just rather put it in the old; I guess its where my talk page is so short. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' <sup>([[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook|sign]])</sup> 04:37, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
531095 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531092 +++$+++ 531094 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.277034120E09 +++$+++ Also, I have a question it is located [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR#Creation of New Lists|here]]. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: blue\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>( +++$+++ :::Also, I have a question it is located [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR#Creation of New Lists|here]]. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' <sup>([[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook|sign]])</sup> 04:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
531096 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531092 +++$+++ 531095 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.277034480E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict) It is supposed to be based on topics. Since my last post I found usable pictures of [[Ron Fellows]], [[Tony Ave]], and [[Alex Kennedy]], sweet! I had a whole bunch before that like [[J. R. Fitzpatrick]] and many others. I've always been a huge fan of the road courses. I like watching the drivers be required to not just turn left all day. Most of the earliest races that I watched were Indy Cars on road courses like Road America. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::(edit conflict) It is supposed to be based on topics. Since my last post I found usable pictures of [[Ron Fellows]], [[Tony Ave]], and [[Alex Kennedy]], sweet! I had a whole bunch before that like [[J. R. Fitzpatrick]] and many others. I've always been a huge fan of the road courses. I like watching the drivers be required to not just turn left all day. Most of the earliest races that I watched were Indy Cars on road courses like Road America. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
531097 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531092 +++$+++ 531096 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.277034660E09 +++$+++ Yes, also when you were saying \"It is supposed to be based on topics\" is that the answer to the question? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: blue\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>( +++$+++ :::::Yes, also when you were saying "It is supposed to be based on topics" is that the answer to the question? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' <sup>([[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook|sign]])</sup> 04:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
531098 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531092 +++$+++ 531097 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.277035320E09 +++$+++ No. Sorry, the edit conflict bit me. I wasn't replying to your question here; I did at WikiProject NASCAR. I was commenting about talk pages in general. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::No. Sorry, the edit conflict bit me. I wasn't replying to your question here; I did at WikiProject NASCAR. I was commenting about talk pages in general. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:02, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

268951 +++$+++ Mr Bungle +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268951 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-19 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.229688840E09 +++$+++ Hi there, thanks for doing the GA review for Paracetamol toxicity. The changes you made were also really helpful, I appreciate it, Thanks again.  +++$+++ Hi there, thanks for doing the GA review for Paracetamol toxicity. The changes you made were also really helpful, I appreciate it, Thanks again. [[User:Mr Bungle|<font face="Old English Text MT"  size="3" >M</font>r Bungle]] | [[User talk:Mr Bungle|<small><font color="blue" >talk</font></small>]] 04:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
268952 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268951 +++$+++ 268951 +++$+++ 2008-12-19 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.229689320E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome.  &mdash; +++$+++ :You are very welcome.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

6809 +++$+++ infonation101 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6809 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-25 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.209170100E09 +++$+++ RonCram, after looking at the archives in global warming controversy it seems that you do your research well.  I'm not skilled in the area of global warming, and would like some back up for a particular thing.  The information from both [http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/graphics\/2006\/11\/05\/warm-refs.pdf this] and [http:\/\/ff.org\/centers\/csspp\/pdf\/20070201_monckton.pdf this] should be included on the page global warming controversy.  After reading the archives, I wouldn't stand a chance going in there, but I have one card.  I know Lord Monckton.  After reading [http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/stoat\/2007\/02\/monckton_curious_take_on_the_s.php this] blog (which is what William posted to your first response) I wrote him and asked him his opinion.  He responded by answering each topic addressed in the blog specifically.  It's quite a long response so I will only post what he sent me with your permission.  What I wanted was to be able to address these topics in the forum and have them posted to the article, but I would need your help.  Please let me know what you think.   +++$+++ RonCram, after looking at the archives in global warming controversy it seems that you do your research well.  I'm not skilled in the area of global warming, and would like some back up for a particular thing.  The information from both [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2006/11/05/warm-refs.pdf this] and [http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20070201_monckton.pdf this] should be included on the page global warming controversy.  After reading the archives, I wouldn't stand a chance going in there, but I have one card.  I know Lord Monckton.  After reading [http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2007/02/monckton_curious_take_on_the_s.php this] blog (which is what William posted to your first response) I wrote him and asked him his opinion.  He responded by answering each topic addressed in the blog specifically.  It's quite a long response so I will only post what he sent me with your permission.  What I wanted was to be able to address these topics in the forum and have them posted to the article, but I would need your help.  Please let me know what you think.  [[User:infonation101|<font color="#1b71db"><b>InfoNation</b><sup>101</sup></font>]] | [[User Talk:infonation101|<font color="#e7a844">talk</font>]] | 17:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
6810 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6809 +++$+++ 6809 +++$+++ 2008-04-26 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.209202440E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the kind words.  Work has kept me very busy lately and will for a while yet.  I promise to take a look at this in detail at a later date.  You are not feeling any time pressure on this, are you?  +++$+++ :Thank you for the kind words.  Work has kept me very busy lately and will for a while yet.  I promise to take a look at this in detail at a later date.  You are not feeling any time pressure on this, are you? [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 02:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
6811 +++$+++ infonation101 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6809 +++$+++ 6810 +++$+++ 2008-04-26 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.209260400E09 +++$+++ No time pressure.  The extra time would allow me to get everything together that I would need to present the argument.  Let me know when you would be most capable to work on this and we'll go from there.   +++$+++ ::No time pressure.  The extra time would allow me to get everything together that I would need to present the argument.  Let me know when you would be most capable to work on this and we'll go from there.  [[User:infonation101|<font color="#1b71db"><b>InfoNation</b><sup>101</sup></font>]] | [[User Talk:infonation101|<font color="#e7a844">talk</font>]] | 18:40, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
6812 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6809 +++$+++ 6810 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.210976700E09 +++$+++ Raymond, you are living in Fantasyland. Climate scientists would like to think Green and Armstrong are not notable, but people are beginning to demand higher level of work than climate scientists have been putting out. Validation and verification of the climate models is beginning to happen and the GCMs are not doing well. Even if they were, they cannot ignore the forecasting principles discovered and described by the scientific forecasting community. I have emailed several climate scientists. Most of them had not heard of scientific forecasting but the honest ones were open to making climate forecasts better. Richard Lindzen supports these principles and they will become used more.  +++$+++ ::Raymond, you are living in Fantasyland. Climate scientists would like to think Green and Armstrong are not notable, but people are beginning to demand higher level of work than climate scientists have been putting out. Validation and verification of the climate models is beginning to happen and the GCMs are not doing well. Even if they were, they cannot ignore the forecasting principles discovered and described by the scientific forecasting community. I have emailed several climate scientists. Most of them had not heard of scientific forecasting but the honest ones were open to making climate forecasts better. Richard Lindzen supports these principles and they will become used more. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram|talk]]) 15:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

531099 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531099 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-20 05:16:00 +++$+++ 1.277036160E09 +++$+++ Okay. I have start [[List of Sprint Cup Series Champions]]. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: blue\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>( +++$+++ Okay. I have start [[List of Sprint Cup Series Champions]]. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' <sup>([[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook|sign]])</sup> 05:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
531100 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531099 +++$+++ 531099 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.277112360E09 +++$+++ If you're not busy, please preview the list and make sure it is good. Also, one editor is wanting to discuss if this article should be merged to [[List of NASCAR champions. It is being discussed [[Talk:List of NASCAR champions#List of Sprint Cup Series Champions|here]]. Thanks. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: blue\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>( +++$+++ :If you're not busy, please preview the list and make sure it is good. Also, one editor is wanting to discuss if this article should be merged to [[List of NASCAR champions. It is being discussed [[Talk:List of NASCAR champions#List of Sprint Cup Series Champions|here]]. Thanks. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' <sup>([[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook|sign]])</sup> 02:26, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
531101 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531099 +++$+++ 531100 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.277185620E09 +++$+++ I want to see how [[List of NASCAR Sprint Cup Series champions]] is doing compared to the Featured list criteria. Will you please help me. Thanks. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: blue\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>( +++$+++ ::I want to see how [[List of NASCAR Sprint Cup Series champions]] is doing compared to the Featured list criteria. Will you please help me. Thanks. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' <sup>([[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook|sign]])</sup> 22:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
531102 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531099 +++$+++ 531101 +++$+++ 2010-06-22 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.277203500E09 +++$+++ I did a quick glance (less than 1 minute). I think it's very far away. Only five references! You need to provide sources for EVERYTHING in the article. There needs to be a lot more text. Probably around C class. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::I did a quick glance (less than 1 minute). I think it's very far away. Only five references! You need to provide sources for EVERYTHING in the article. There needs to be a lot more text. Probably around C class. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:45, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
531103 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531099 +++$+++ 531102 +++$+++ 2010-06-22 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.277203740E09 +++$+++ Okay. That is very dissapointing, I thought it would be better. Guess I'll never do [[User:Nascar1996\/tasks|this]] then. :( --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: blue\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[User:Nascar1996\/tasks|Go]]  +++$+++ ::::Okay. That is very dissapointing, I thought it would be better. Guess I'll never do [[User:Nascar1996/tasks|this]] then. :( --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[User:Nascar1996/tasks|Go]] [[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook|Jimmie Johnson]]''</sup> 03:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
531104 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531099 +++$+++ 531103 +++$+++ 2010-06-22 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.277206080E09 +++$+++ That's why anything Featured is held in such high regard - it's a LOT of work just to do one article! It needs to be so complete that no one should be able to ask \"Why didn't this article talk about... (insert a major situation about a topic)?\" You've been having an easy time making Good Articles compared to anyone else that I know. NASCAR race reports are a fairly limited topic. I think that you shouldn't give up so easy. I think it can be done. I heard of both of these owners and writing a stub shouldn't be a big deal since there should be ample sources. If you're not on a fast track, I would like to write articles on these two people in the next few weeks. I probably have pictures of their cars; I remember one for Krauskopf - I think I took it with the K&K Insurance sponsorship. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::That's why anything Featured is held in such high regard - it's a LOT of work just to do one article! It needs to be so complete that no one should be able to ask "Why didn't this article talk about... (insert a major situation about a topic)?" You've been having an easy time making Good Articles compared to anyone else that I know. NASCAR race reports are a fairly limited topic. I think that you shouldn't give up so easy. I think it can be done. I heard of both of these owners and writing a stub shouldn't be a big deal since there should be ample sources. If you're not on a fast track, I would like to write articles on these two people in the next few weeks. I probably have pictures of their cars; I remember one for Krauskopf - I think I took it with the K&K Insurance sponsorship. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:28, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

6813 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-16 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.210983960E09 +++$+++ A lot of insubstatiated assertions, that have absolutely no place here. Please try to focus on what [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] say, instead of on what you believe. Your personal [[WP:POV|point of view]] is uninteresting. (all personal POV's are). -- +++$+++ A lot of insubstatiated assertions, that have absolutely no place here. Please try to focus on what [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] say, instead of on what you believe. Your personal [[WP:POV|point of view]] is uninteresting. (all personal POV's are). --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 17:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6814 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.210991220E09 +++$+++ Kim, if you really think I have violated a rule - cut the parts that offend.  By reverting the entire edit, no one will know the evidence for my change to the article.   +++$+++ :Kim, if you really think I have violated a rule - cut the parts that offend.  By reverting the entire edit, no one will know the evidence for my change to the article.  [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 19:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6815 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ 6814 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.210992720E09 +++$+++ Ron, the problem with the above, is that you are not providing evidence, you are simply asserting. Without any backing for your statements, its simply a claim, and a personal point of view. If i had to cut from the above - then there wouldn't be anything left. -- +++$+++ ::Ron, the problem with the above, is that you are not providing evidence, you are simply asserting. Without any backing for your statements, its simply a claim, and a personal point of view. If i had to cut from the above - then there wouldn't be anything left. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 19:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6816 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ 6815 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.210993380E09 +++$+++ Kim, if you cut every Talk page entry that did not have a citation, you would have very short pages.  Most of them do not offer a reference.  We are offering our logic and evidence already known.  Regarding my change to the article, I mentioned the Acknowledgement section of the E&E paper.  But you did not even bother to read it.  The second entry was very different from when I just deleted the part that was in error. I did not put any OR in the article.  +++$+++ :::Kim, if you cut every Talk page entry that did not have a citation, you would have very short pages.  Most of them do not offer a reference.  We are offering our logic and evidence already known.  Regarding my change to the article, I mentioned the Acknowledgement section of the E&E paper.  But you did not even bother to read it.  The second entry was very different from when I just deleted the part that was in error. I did not put any OR in the article. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 20:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6817 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.211000820E09 +++$+++ And I thought I lived in Iowa. Why am I paying a mortgage on a house there? If you can explain that, you'd save me a lot of money.  +++$+++ ::::::*And I thought I lived in Iowa. Why am I paying a mortgage on a house there? If you can explain that, you'd save me a lot of money. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] ([[User talk:Raymond arritt|talk]]) 22:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6818 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.211012940E09 +++$+++ Raymond, at least you have a good sense of humor.  I do like that about you!  But then Dopey had a good sense of humor too.  Didn't he live in Fantasyland as well?  +++$+++ :::::::Raymond, at least you have a good sense of humor.  I do like that about you!  But then Dopey had a good sense of humor too.  Didn't he live in Fantasyland as well? [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 01:29, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6819 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.211013180E09 +++$+++ Haven't seen him round these parts. I think he works as an executive somewhere in Southern California.  +++$+++ ::::::::Haven't seen him round these parts. I think he works as an executive somewhere in Southern California. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] ([[User talk:Raymond arritt|talk]]) 01:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6820 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.211013360E09 +++$+++ I know the place.  I drive right by there on my way to work every morning. +++$+++ :::::::::I know the place.  I drive right by there on my way to work every morning.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 01:36, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6821 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.211001660E09 +++$+++ Thats 3 people of of how many? You do generalize quite a bit - don't cha'? -- +++$+++ :::::**Thats 3 people of of how many? You do generalize quite a bit - don't cha'? --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 22:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6822 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.211012820E09 +++$+++ Kim, do you really expect climate scientists to have a different opinion.  This is their bread and butter we are talking about.  This is how they put food on the table.  Of course, they want climate research funding to continue to flow at a high level.  Find me one global warming scientist who does not hold this opinion. +++$+++ ::::::**Kim, do you really expect climate scientists to have a different opinion.  This is their bread and butter we are talking about.  This is how they put food on the table.  Of course, they want climate research funding to continue to flow at a high level.  Find me one global warming scientist who does not hold this opinion.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 01:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6823 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.211013060E09 +++$+++ Non sequitur.  +++$+++ :::::::*Non sequitur. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] ([[User talk:Raymond arritt|talk]]) 01:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6824 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.211013300E09 +++$+++ Not at all, Raymond.  To claim G&A are non-notable is a PR ploy.  It is a dodge to avoid the issue.  If climate science were really above the principles of scientific forecasting, someone would present an exposition supporting this.  This has not been done.  This just want to dismiss them with arm waving to keep the funding flowing.  +++$+++ ::::::::Not at all, Raymond.  To claim G&A are non-notable is a PR ploy.  It is a dodge to avoid the issue.  If climate science were really above the principles of scientific forecasting, someone would present an exposition supporting this.  This has not been done.  This just want to dismiss them with arm waving to keep the funding flowing. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 01:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6825 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.211014680E09 +++$+++ Actually this is the ''opposite'' of what we'd do if we wanted to keep the funds flowing. If someone could show that we had climate modeling all wrong, then we'd be able to argue for more funds so that we could get it right. And given the societal importance of the problem we'd very likely succeed.  +++$+++ :::::::::Actually this is the ''opposite'' of what we'd do if we wanted to keep the funds flowing. If someone could show that we had climate modeling all wrong, then we'd be able to argue for more funds so that we could get it right. And given the societal importance of the problem we'd very likely succeed. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] ([[User talk:Raymond arritt|talk]]) 01:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6826 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.211034180E09 +++$+++ Nonsense.  Continuation of high level of funding is dependent on people being scared.  If scientific forecasts were made, people would be less scared and the funding would dry up. +++$+++ ::::::::::Nonsense.  Continuation of high level of funding is dependent on people being scared.  If scientific forecasts were made, people would be less scared and the funding would dry up.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 07:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6827 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.211001660E09 +++$+++ Thats a grand total of 16 people. Many of whom had this opinion ''before''. Its a tiny minority of scientists and even more tiny one of people (in general). Try to differentiate between individuals making statements, and a larger community - ok? The relevant WP policy is [[WP:WEIGHT]].  -- +++$+++ :::::**Thats a grand total of 16 people. Many of whom had this opinion ''before''. Its a tiny minority of scientists and even more tiny one of people (in general). Try to differentiate between individuals making statements, and a larger community - ok? The relevant WP policy is [[WP:WEIGHT]].  --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 22:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6828 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.211013180E09 +++$+++ Wait. The GCMs have overpredicted global warming and failed all of these verification tests on tropical troposphere warming and precipitation and everything else and you want to claim [[WP:WEIGHT]].  Show me what validation and verification tests the GCMs have passed! You need to read some of these papers, Kim.  Honestly.  +++$+++ ::::::**Wait. The GCMs have overpredicted global warming and failed all of these verification tests on tropical troposphere warming and precipitation and everything else and you want to claim [[WP:WEIGHT]].  Show me what validation and verification tests the GCMs have passed! You need to read some of these papers, Kim.  Honestly. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 01:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6829 +++$+++ Oren0 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-23 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.211540880E09 +++$+++ \"Thats a grand total of 16 people...Its a tiny minority of scientists and even more tiny one of people (in general).\" What an absurd misapplication of [[WP:WEIGHT]].  How many people contributed to the latest IPCC report?  For the sake of argument, let's say a few thousand.  What percentage is that of the millions of scientists in the world?  What percentage of the world's population?  I guess by your interpretation WP:WEIGHT doesn't allow us to quote the IPCC, right? 16 scientific opinions published in reliable sources are easily enough to warrant inclusion on a page.  And more generally, why are you applying mainspace rules about original research, etc to talk pages?  +++$+++ ::::::***"Thats a grand total of 16 people...Its a tiny minority of scientists and even more tiny one of people (in general)." What an absurd misapplication of [[WP:WEIGHT]].  How many people contributed to the latest IPCC report?  For the sake of argument, let's say a few thousand.  What percentage is that of the millions of scientists in the world?  What percentage of the world's population?  I guess by your interpretation WP:WEIGHT doesn't allow us to quote the IPCC, right? 16 scientific opinions published in reliable sources are easily enough to warrant inclusion on a page.  And more generally, why are you applying mainspace rules about original research, etc to talk pages? [[User:Oren0|Oren0]] ([[User talk:Oren0|talk]]) 04:08, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
6830 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.211825160E09 +++$+++ The IPCC is speaking from a position of assessing the literature - not from personal opinion. So its a rather different thing. The 16 people in question are a strange assorted collection of bloggers, statisticians, political scientists and others - who are all expressing their personal opinion, these opinions do not overlap. And apparently it has little traction in media outside of blogs. So [[WP:WEIGHT]] is very much the correct application. -- +++$+++ ::::::****The IPCC is speaking from a position of assessing the literature - not from personal opinion. So its a rather different thing. The 16 people in question are a strange assorted collection of bloggers, statisticians, political scientists and others - who are all expressing their personal opinion, these opinions do not overlap. And apparently it has little traction in media outside of blogs. So [[WP:WEIGHT]] is very much the correct application. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 11:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
6831 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.211002080E09 +++$+++ Your responses above are POV - not actual evidence. -- +++$+++ :::::**Your responses above are POV - not actual evidence. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 22:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6832 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.211013840E09 +++$+++ Kim, I have given you links to actual science.  Based on real observations and statistics, published in journals not named E&E.  This is your assignment, should you decide to accept it - go, read the articles before you type anymore here.  Besides I have a date with my wife and can no longer continue the repartee.  +++$+++ ::::::*Kim, I have given you links to actual science.  Based on real observations and statistics, published in journals not named E&E.  This is your assignment, should you decide to accept it - go, read the articles before you type anymore here.  Besides I have a date with my wife and can no longer continue the repartee. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 01:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6833 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.211001960E09 +++$+++ There are 4 journals that Armstrong has been involved in. How come you haven't shown us ''any'' other people than Armstrong who have posted opinions about this in those journals? Could it be because those journals in fact are mainly about economics and social sciences? For that matter - why doesn't Armstrong get his papers printed there - instead of in the rather dodgy [[Energy and Environment]]? -- +++$+++ :::::**There are 4 journals that Armstrong has been involved in. How come you haven't shown us ''any'' other people than Armstrong who have posted opinions about this in those journals? Could it be because those journals in fact are mainly about economics and social sciences? For that matter - why doesn't Armstrong get his papers printed there - instead of in the rather dodgy [[Energy and Environment]]? --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 22:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6834 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.211000940E09 +++$+++ I have emailed several climate scientists too. In fact I email several of them every day. Is that also background that is important for Wikipedia editors to know? Just checking.  +++$+++ ::::::*I have emailed several climate scientists too. In fact I email several of them every day. Is that also background that is important for Wikipedia editors to know? Just checking. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] ([[User talk:Raymond arritt|talk]]) 22:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6835 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.211012580E09 +++$+++ Raymond, you are responding to a sentence fragment.  If Kim had not broken the sentence into two parts, it would have made more sense. My response really should have been to the sentence below. +++$+++ :::::::*Raymond, you are responding to a sentence fragment.  If Kim had not broken the sentence into two parts, it would have made more sense. My response really should have been to the sentence below.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 01:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6836 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.211002020E09 +++$+++ You are basing your evidence on personal trust in a few - and general disbelief in many. Thats a personal point of view. And its not relevant for Wikipedia unless you can provide sources that state this point of view - beyond [[WP:FRINGE]]. -- +++$+++ :::::**You are basing your evidence on personal trust in a few - and general disbelief in many. Thats a personal point of view. And its not relevant for Wikipedia unless you can provide sources that state this point of view - beyond [[WP:FRINGE]]. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 22:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6837 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ 6816 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.210994460E09 +++$+++ As you see - there is nothing left. -- +++$+++ ::::As you see - there is nothing left. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 20:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6838 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ 6816 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.210994460E09 +++$+++ And please - its time you took to heart, that [[Energy and Environment]] isn't a reliable source. This has been pointed out numerous times as well. -- +++$+++ ::::And please - its time you took to heart, that [[Energy and Environment]] isn't a reliable source. This has been pointed out numerous times as well. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 20:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6839 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ 6838 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.210998420E09 +++$+++ Kim, E&E is a reliable source on the views of the scientists who publish there.  Even if it was only a blog like RealClimate, that would be true. RS is not the issue.  +++$+++ :::::Kim, E&E is a reliable source on the views of the scientists who publish there.  Even if it was only a blog like RealClimate, that would be true. RS is not the issue. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 21:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6840 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ 6839 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.211001660E09 +++$+++ Yes - but the opinion of individuals is rather irrelevant. What we need is evidence that their opinion is shared by more than a tiny minority. And for that, we can't use these sources. -- +++$+++ ::::::Yes - but the opinion of individuals is rather irrelevant. What we need is evidence that their opinion is shared by more than a tiny minority. And for that, we can't use these sources. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 22:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
6841 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ 6840 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.211010000E09 +++$+++ What are you talking about?  You keep shifting the goalposts.  The article is about [[Global warming controversy]].  Part of the controversy involves the way IPCC projections are made.  The entire scientific forecasting community would agree with A&G that climate forecasts should be scientific.  There are hundreds of academics in this group.  +++$+++ :::::::What are you talking about?  You keep shifting the goalposts.  The article is about [[Global warming controversy]].  Part of the controversy involves the way IPCC projections are made.  The entire scientific forecasting community would agree with A&G that climate forecasts should be scientific.  There are hundreds of academics in this group. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 00:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6842 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6813 +++$+++ 6841 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.211011020E09 +++$+++ Try to actually focus on what you ''can show'' - instead of what ''you believe''. -- +++$+++ ::::::::Try to actually focus on what you ''can show'' - instead of what ''you believe''. --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 00:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

268961 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268961 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-21 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.229861880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for helping! Feel free to edit as much as you want! I'm not the best writer in the world. I'll try to expand and fix the areas you asked about. I have one quick question, what did you mean by the \"technical aspects of the film\"?  Also, the only thing about the genre choice isn't so much an effect on the film as that it's why they decided to write the film, so it's just part of the screenwriting history of it. Could you re-phrase these problems? :)  +++$+++ Thanks for helping! Feel free to edit as much as you want! I'm not the best writer in the world. I'll try to expand and fix the areas you asked about. I have one quick question, what did you mean by the "technical aspects of the film"?  Also, the only thing about the genre choice isn't so much an effect on the film as that it's why they decided to write the film, so it's just part of the screenwriting history of it. Could you re-phrase these problems? :) [[User:Andrzejbanas|Andrzejbanas]] ([[User talk:Andrzejbanas|talk]]) 04:18, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
268962 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268961 +++$+++ 268961 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.229862240E09 +++$+++ I haven't looked at it that closely yet. Perhaps what I mean is the genre issues. I know that you like horror films and with [[Eyes Without a Face]], you added much interesting detail about the horror elements and clarified some issues with very good information. (I can't remember specifically. I will have to look, but I will let you know.) Do you remember the changes you made to [[Eyes Without a Face]]? They were very good and greatly added to the article.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I haven't looked at it that closely yet. Perhaps what I mean is the genre issues. I know that you like horror films and with [[Eyes Without a Face]], you added much interesting detail about the horror elements and clarified some issues with very good information. (I can't remember specifically. I will have to look, but I will let you know.) Do you remember the changes you made to [[Eyes Without a Face]]? They were very good and greatly added to the article.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:24, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
268963 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268961 +++$+++ 268962 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.229929260E09 +++$+++ I don't remember specific changes. They were sort of there before the review started. I've dug up all the interviews and items on The Orphanage as I can for now. (it's hard to find interviews for a director who doesn't speak much english. :)). So I've got what I can. I've fixed all the other problems too I believe. Care to re-read when you have the chance? Cheers!  +++$+++ ::I don't remember specific changes. They were sort of there before the review started. I've dug up all the interviews and items on The Orphanage as I can for now. (it's hard to find interviews for a director who doesn't speak much english. :)). So I've got what I can. I've fixed all the other problems too I believe. Care to re-read when you have the chance? Cheers! [[User:Andrzejbanas|Andrzejbanas]] ([[User talk:Andrzejbanas|talk]]) 23:01, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
268964 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268961 +++$+++ 268963 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.229955060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for all your help again to bringing the article to a GA class! More coming eventually!  +++$+++ :::Thanks for all your help again to bringing the article to a GA class! More coming eventually! [[User:Andrzejbanas|Andrzejbanas]] ([[User talk:Andrzejbanas|talk]]) 06:11, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
268965 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268961 +++$+++ 268964 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 06:15:00 +++$+++ 1.229955300E09 +++$+++ It is a pleasure when an article is both interesting and well done. I look forward to your future articles!  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::It is a pleasure when an article is both interesting and well done. I look forward to your future articles!  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 06:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

268966 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-21 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.229866080E09 +++$+++ Well I thought I would tell you that Lockdown's FAC has been restarted. I'm informing everyone who said anything in it before the restart.-- +++$+++ Well I thought I would tell you that Lockdown's FAC has been restarted. I'm informing everyone who said anything in it before the restart.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 05:28, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
268967 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 05:34:00 +++$+++ 1.229866440E09 +++$+++ I saw that. I thought you were at the end of your tether already! I suggest, from deep down in my heart, that you take the advice that editors suggest on the FAC, regardless of whether you agree. Pare down the background section and spin off the rest. Put it in your userspace until you determine what to do with it. You can't get anywhere resisting the suggestions given there. (This advice is meant to be of help and not to criticize you.)  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I saw that. I thought you were at the end of your tether already! I suggest, from deep down in my heart, that you take the advice that editors suggest on the FAC, regardless of whether you agree. Pare down the background section and spin off the rest. Put it in your userspace until you determine what to do with it. You can't get anywhere resisting the suggestions given there. (This advice is meant to be of help and not to criticize you.)  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 05:34, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
268968 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 268967 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.229867700E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I know. It is just, I don't understand what the problem is. Would you leave out a cast member from a movie because they didn't do much but where a key member of the movie? No. I just don't get it. The match happened at the event. It got three months of build. All the matches at the event besides two got more than four weeks of build, which is usually the main event's build up. The main event got build on two major things for near two to three months. All I hear from people is: well the article should not be long because it will turn away readers from wanting to read it. Though no one ever thinks: maybe they want to know about all the matches and not three. I have that argument with alot of people from the wrestling project, though they don't watch TNA and think it is like WWE. Sorry to rant. Near 8 months or built up quietness is starting to come out because that is how long I've had to hold it in with people saying it is too long. May to now, I'm going insane. Well, thanks for the advice, I'll take it into consideration. I'm about to just re-write the background. I've been thinking about it for a while now, and maybe I can find a better way to explain things after I read all the Impact reviews leading to the event. Not sure if I'll do it though, but now seems like a good time to do it.-- +++$+++ ::Yeah, I know. It is just, I don't understand what the problem is. Would you leave out a cast member from a movie because they didn't do much but where a key member of the movie? No. I just don't get it. The match happened at the event. It got three months of build. All the matches at the event besides two got more than four weeks of build, which is usually the main event's build up. The main event got build on two major things for near two to three months. All I hear from people is: well the article should not be long because it will turn away readers from wanting to read it. Though no one ever thinks: maybe they want to know about all the matches and not three. I have that argument with alot of people from the wrestling project, though they don't watch TNA and think it is like WWE. Sorry to rant. Near 8 months or built up quietness is starting to come out because that is how long I've had to hold it in with people saying it is too long. May to now, I'm going insane. Well, thanks for the advice, I'll take it into consideration. I'm about to just re-write the background. I've been thinking about it for a while now, and maybe I can find a better way to explain things after I read all the Impact reviews leading to the event. Not sure if I'll do it though, but now seems like a good time to do it.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 05:55, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
268969 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 268968 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.229870220E09 +++$+++ You have to do what they say. It is not particularly rational, it is just the way the game is played at FAC. It is very rigid and the outcome determined by a few. If you want to do it your way, then don't go to FAC. At FAC, they determine the rules, however meaningless. It is sort of like if you applied to be a deputy sheriff, you can't say you smoke marijuana, whether you do or not, if you expect to get the job.  FAC is all about getting along with them. It is not a place to stand on principle or \"truth\". You have done remarkably well there, to even reach the point of a \"Restart\" instead of being tossed aside, like most. So, it is your decision to go through all that again. But if you do decide to, there is little point in doing it the same way as before, or you will get the same result. &mdash; +++$+++ :::You have to do what they say. It is not particularly rational, it is just the way the game is played at FAC. It is very rigid and the outcome determined by a few. If you want to do it your way, then don't go to FAC. At FAC, they determine the rules, however meaningless. It is sort of like if you applied to be a deputy sheriff, you can't say you smoke marijuana, whether you do or not, if you expect to get the job.  FAC is all about getting along with them. It is not a place to stand on principle or "truth". You have done remarkably well there, to even reach the point of a "Restart" instead of being tossed aside, like most. So, it is your decision to go through all that again. But if you do decide to, there is little point in doing it the same way as before, or you will get the same result. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 06:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
268970 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.229870640E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm going to do as they say but I hope people will see my point. If not, then I guess I'll have to put my pride aside and do as I've done before; remove stuff I believe is needed.-- +++$+++ :Yeah, I'm going to do as they say but I hope people will see my point. If not, then I guess I'll have to put my pride aside and do as I've done before; remove stuff I believe is needed.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 06:44, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
268971 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 268970 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.229870940E09 +++$+++ Yes, exactly. Don't look at it as a matter of pride. It has nothing to do with that. It is how you play the game. Just like football, or whatever. A move that is made out of pride will not win the game. (Well, maybe in wrestling it will!)  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Yes, exactly. Don't look at it as a matter of pride. It has nothing to do with that. It is how you play the game. Just like football, or whatever. A move that is made out of pride will not win the game. (Well, maybe in wrestling it will!)  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 06:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
268972 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.229871300E09 +++$+++ Yeah, okay. Well nice talking to you.-- +++$+++ :Yeah, okay. Well nice talking to you.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 06:55, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
268973 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 268972 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.229871540E09 +++$+++ Look at it this way, at some time in the future you will be the \"father\" of TNA at Wikipedia.  But to get there requires one step at a time. Personally, I think it is '''huge''' that you have gotten as far as you have at FAC. You can be very proud of that.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Look at it this way, at some time in the future you will be the "father" of TNA at Wikipedia.  But to get there requires one step at a time. Personally, I think it is '''huge''' that you have gotten as far as you have at FAC. You can be very proud of that.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 06:59, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
268974 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.229872080E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't say \"father\". That is too ownish. I accredit myself more as the delegate or something along those lines since I'm the only one who expands TNA stuff. Lockdown is more a stepping stone. I plan to make a FA Topic with all of TNA's 2008 events. Lockdown is just to know what an FA is. From there I'll work onward. Thanks for the compliment though.-- +++$+++ :I wouldn't say "father". That is too ownish. I accredit myself more as the delegate or something along those lines since I'm the only one who expands TNA stuff. Lockdown is more a stepping stone. I plan to make a FA Topic with all of TNA's 2008 events. Lockdown is just to know what an FA is. From there I'll work onward. Thanks for the compliment though.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 07:08, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
268975 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268966 +++$+++ 268974 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.229943900E09 +++$+++ Okay, it doesn't matter anyway. It was over already. I await to see your vote.-- +++$+++ ::Okay, it doesn't matter anyway. It was over already. I await to see your vote.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 03:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

531111 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531111 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-23 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.277338200E09 +++$+++ Also, where you are a admin would you please un delete [[2011 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series]]; the admin that deleted it is no longer active. Thanks. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: blue\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996|Contribs]] \/  +++$+++ Also, where you are a admin would you please un delete [[2011 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series]]; the admin that deleted it is no longer active. Thanks. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996|Contribs]] / [[User:Nascar1996/tasks|Tasks]] ''</sup> 17:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
531112 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531111 +++$+++ 531111 +++$+++ 2010-06-24 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.277364300E09 +++$+++ {{tick|18}} '''{{ucfirst:Done}}''' Again, this is a completely separate topic that should be its own section. I undeleted it, its an almost-certain future event. I'm happy to help. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :{{tick|18}} '''{{ucfirst:Done}}''' Again, this is a completely separate topic that should be its own section. I undeleted it, its an almost-certain future event. I'm happy to help. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
531113 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531111 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-24 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.277366280E09 +++$+++ I have my email address shown in my preferences does that mean it is enabled if so then yes. Thanks you for undeleting that. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: blue\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996|Contribs]] \/  +++$+++ ::::I have my email address shown in my preferences does that mean it is enabled if so then yes. Thanks you for undeleting that. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996|Contribs]] / [[User:Nascar1996/tasks|Tasks]] ''</sup> 00:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
531114 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531111 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-24 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.277371920E09 +++$+++ The sentence you pointed out needs to be reworded some how because Spped and Mears were team mates and Ekstrom was Mears replacement for Sonomo only then Reed Sorenson will replace him afterwards. The Phoenix Racing team is no way similair to Red Bull Racing's collision. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Arial;color: blue\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996|Contribs]] \/  +++$+++ :::::The sentence you pointed out needs to be reworded some how because Spped and Mears were team mates and Ekstrom was Mears replacement for Sonomo only then Reed Sorenson will replace him afterwards. The Phoenix Racing team is no way similair to Red Bull Racing's collision. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Arial;color: blue">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996|Contribs]] / [[User:Nascar1996/tasks|Tasks]] ''</sup> 02:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
531115 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531111 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-24 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.277375760E09 +++$+++ The article flow is overall better but there are definitely some issues (I pointed out some). So did Mears lose his ride? If so, you might want to say that the team used Ekstrom as a fill-in driver while changing drivers. It also should be said when the accident happened (I think it was the week before). '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::The article flow is overall better but there are definitely some issues (I pointed out some). So did Mears lose his ride? If so, you might want to say that the team used Ekstrom as a fill-in driver while changing drivers. It also should be said when the accident happened (I think it was the week before). '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

531117 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-21 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.277150520E09 +++$+++ In my browsing and wanderings through WP-Wisconsin I came across an article on the Wisconsin Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired. Would you please take a look at it-the article has possibilities-I do believe some of the buildings are on the NRHP register. Also I had to do a move for the official name of the school-as always I hope you are well-I had \"minor\" surgery last week sort of an emergency-doing better-Thank you- +++$+++ In my browsing and wanderings through WP-Wisconsin I came across an article on the Wisconsin Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired. Would you please take a look at it-the article has possibilities-I do believe some of the buildings are on the NRHP register. Also I had to do a move for the official name of the school-as always I hope you are well-I had "minor" surgery last week sort of an emergency-doing better-Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
531118 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531117 +++$+++ 531117 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.277151780E09 +++$+++ I'm glad to hear that you are doing well after your surgery and I pray for your recovery. I'm on vacation today and Friday. I had a great weekend. I watch [[Matt Kenseth]]'s son Ross Kenseth race at [[Wisconsin International Raceway]] on Thursday, caught the [[Nationwide Series]] race on Saturday at [[Road America]], and went to [[Slinger Speedway]] on Sunday night. All three were very memorable. This Thursday night I'm going to my uncle's cabin in northern Wisconsin for a weekend getaway. I hope some sightseeing in [[Escanaba, Michigan]] with my family next Friday and races at [[Norway Speedway]] that night if the weather is good. I have lots of pictures to upload from the NASCAR race of both the drivers and the cars. I'm not seeing an obvious connection to the National Register in a quick check of [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Rock County, Wisconsin]]. No time to look now; I'm doing some tourism today as well. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I'm glad to hear that you are doing well after your surgery and I pray for your recovery. I'm on vacation today and Friday. I had a great weekend. I watch [[Matt Kenseth]]'s son Ross Kenseth race at [[Wisconsin International Raceway]] on Thursday, caught the [[Nationwide Series]] race on Saturday at [[Road America]], and went to [[Slinger Speedway]] on Sunday night. All three were very memorable. This Thursday night I'm going to my uncle's cabin in northern Wisconsin for a weekend getaway. I hope some sightseeing in [[Escanaba, Michigan]] with my family next Friday and races at [[Norway Speedway]] that night if the weather is good. I have lots of pictures to upload from the NASCAR race of both the drivers and the cars. I'm not seeing an obvious connection to the National Register in a quick check of [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Rock County, Wisconsin]]. No time to look now; I'm doing some tourism today as well. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
531119 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531117 +++$+++ 531117 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.277173080E09 +++$+++ I check the NRHP register for listings for Rock County, Wisconsin also and I did not noticed anything. There are some buildings at the Wisconsin School for the Deaf in Walworth County that I think is one the NRHP register-Hope your upcoming weekend goes well-have a good time-many thanks- +++$+++ :I check the NRHP register for listings for Rock County, Wisconsin also and I did not noticed anything. There are some buildings at the Wisconsin School for the Deaf in Walworth County that I think is one the NRHP register-Hope your upcoming weekend goes well-have a good time-many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 19:18, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

268977 +++$+++ Chimro +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-23 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.230032940E09 +++$+++ Yes, I plan to stick around. I've been editing for quite a while without registering an account. -- +++$+++ Yes, I plan to stick around. I've been editing for quite a while without registering an account. --[[User:Chimro|Chimro]] ([[User talk:Chimro|talk]]) 03:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
268978 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268977 +++$+++ 268977 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.230033600E09 +++$+++ OK, great. I find the article interesting and will add some comments to the review page. It will be at [[Talk:Live Prayer\/GA1]]. I will add comments in a bit. In general, the article looks pretty good.   &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, great. I find the article interesting and will add some comments to the review page. It will be at [[Talk:Live Prayer/GA1]]. I will add comments in a bit. In general, the article looks pretty good.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
268979 +++$+++ Alastair Haines +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268977 +++$+++ 268978 +++$+++ 2008-12-24 06:48:00 +++$+++ 1.230130080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your note. Best wishes.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your note. Best wishes. [[User:Alastair Haines|Alastair Haines]] ([[User talk:Alastair Haines|talk]]) 06:48, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

531124 +++$+++ Drdisque +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531124 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-27 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.277708280E09 +++$+++ I didn't realize you had written [[Jared Siefert]]. I was in the process of going through [[:Category:American racecar drivers]] and either cleaning up or AFDing the worst I find there. I nominated the article because I don't feel that [[IMCA Modified]] is a fully professional series and therefore drivers who have only competed in the series may not meet [[WP:ATHLETE]]. If you can provide any information regarding the \"professional\" status of IMCA Modified I would gladly withdraw the nomination. - +++$+++ I didn't realize you had written [[Jared Siefert]]. I was in the process of going through [[:Category:American racecar drivers]] and either cleaning up or AFDing the worst I find there. I nominated the article because I don't feel that [[IMCA Modified]] is a fully professional series and therefore drivers who have only competed in the series may not meet [[WP:ATHLETE]]. If you can provide any information regarding the "professional" status of IMCA Modified I would gladly withdraw the nomination. -[[User:Drdisque|Drdisque]] ([[User talk:Drdisque|talk]]) 23:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
531125 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531124 +++$+++ 531124 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.277711640E09 +++$+++ I guess you choose your battles. There was no mention of fully professional in ATHLETE until it was just rewritten and I find requiring a driver to be fully professional to be lacking in some cases when GNC is easily met with someone who accomplished a national championship. That WP:ATHLETE discussion isn't even completed and there is significant opposition. I'm glad you found some of the worse cases because I never understood why some articles were created. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I guess you choose your battles. There was no mention of fully professional in ATHLETE until it was just rewritten and I find requiring a driver to be fully professional to be lacking in some cases when GNC is easily met with someone who accomplished a national championship. That WP:ATHLETE discussion isn't even completed and there is significant opposition. I'm glad you found some of the worse cases because I never understood why some articles were created. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:54, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

268981 +++$+++ Risker +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268981 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-25 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.230207180E09 +++$+++ Wishing you and yours a joyous holiday season, and happiness, health and hopefulness in 2009. I trust you'll enjoy this little token, a favourite performance of [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=U_QoSg9HT7w ''Baby, it's Cold Outside''], for your holiday amusement. <\/br> Best,  +++$+++ Wishing you and yours a joyous holiday season, and happiness, health and hopefulness in 2009. I trust you'll enjoy this little token, a favourite performance of [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_QoSg9HT7w ''Baby, it's Cold Outside''], for your holiday amusement. </br> Best, [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 04:13, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
268982 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268981 +++$+++ 268981 +++$+++ 2008-12-25 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.230208020E09 +++$+++ Not sure what this is supposed to mean. I would say nada. The question of favoratism was never answered by you. Posting a link to your page here of my post to you somehow does not address that. Sign me Confused, &mdash; +++$+++ :Not sure what this is supposed to mean. I would say nada. The question of favoratism was never answered by you. Posting a link to your page here of my post to you somehow does not address that. Sign me Confused, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:27, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

531126 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-28 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.277782860E09 +++$+++ There is an article about [[Jerris Leonard]]; however, another editor did another article [[Jerris G. Leonard]]-same man. I redirected this editor's article to the first article with limited results what went wrong? Thank you- +++$+++ There is an article about [[Jerris Leonard]]; however, another editor did another article [[Jerris G. Leonard]]-same man. I redirected this editor's article to the first article with limited results what went wrong? Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 20:41, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
531127 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531126 +++$+++ 531126 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.277790660E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your help- +++$+++ :Many thanks for your help-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 22:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

268984 +++$+++ SnowFire +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268984 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-16 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.229477100E09 +++$+++ Just to be clear, don't feel obliged at all; Wikipedia is a volunteer project, I can ask others, etc.  That said, I'd certainly appreciate anything you can offer.  +++$+++ Just to be clear, don't feel obliged at all; Wikipedia is a volunteer project, I can ask others, etc.  That said, I'd certainly appreciate anything you can offer. [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 17:25, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
268985 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268984 +++$+++ 268984 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.229479800E09 +++$+++ Sure, I will give it a try. I do not know anything about the subject matter, so feel free to change anything I do. Unintentionally, I may change the meaning. I am assuming you have addressed the specifics already brought up on the FAC, so that your concern is more general issues?  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Sure, I will give it a try. I do not know anything about the subject matter, so feel free to change anything I do. Unintentionally, I may change the meaning. I am assuming you have addressed the specifics already brought up on the FAC, so that your concern is more general issues?  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:10, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
268986 +++$+++ SnowFire +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268984 +++$+++ 268985 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.229513280E09 +++$+++ As for your initial comments...  the bit about the lede I'm not sure I follow.  I'm fairly certain that the lede *does* summarize the article pretty accurately and is the short blurb version you might see in a less in-depth work.  Do you have any particular complaints about it?  (The only one I can think of was that Karanacs wants the phrase \"with the deaths of the other heirs\" taken out, which I'm not sure of yet myself.)  As for other information in the Origins...  interesting comment, because I was worried that others might complain that the section was too large.  The origins section is already pretty large - necessarily so, IMHO - and with the article already fairly long, I'd really be hesitant about adding in more background.  Is there something that you thought should be included in particular?  Or even a general area you felt lacks enough context?  Would some kind of link to the history of Spain\/Europe in the early 1500s help?  Not sure what seems to be \"missing\" here.  +++$+++ ::As for your initial comments...  the bit about the lede I'm not sure I follow.  I'm fairly certain that the lede *does* summarize the article pretty accurately and is the short blurb version you might see in a less in-depth work.  Do you have any particular complaints about it?  (The only one I can think of was that Karanacs wants the phrase "with the deaths of the other heirs" taken out, which I'm not sure of yet myself.)  As for other information in the Origins...  interesting comment, because I was worried that others might complain that the section was too large.  The origins section is already pretty large - necessarily so, IMHO - and with the article already fairly long, I'd really be hesitant about adding in more background.  Is there something that you thought should be included in particular?  Or even a general area you felt lacks enough context?  Would some kind of link to the history of Spain/Europe in the early 1500s help?  Not sure what seems to be "missing" here. [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 03:28, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
268987 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268984 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.229515020E09 +++$+++ As I said, if I weren't feeling so overwhelmingly tired and had sufficient time, I might be able to figure it out. Even tomorrow, I may have new life. I'm not meaning to be discouraging, as the article obviously contains important content and is a potential  FA. I want to be informed about the events in the article. Perhaps tomorrow will be another day! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::*As I said, if I weren't feeling so overwhelmingly tired and had sufficient time, I might be able to figure it out. Even tomorrow, I may have new life. I'm not meaning to be discouraging, as the article obviously contains important content and is a potential  FA. I want to be informed about the events in the article. Perhaps tomorrow will be another day! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:57, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
268988 +++$+++ SnowFire +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268984 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.229578380E09 +++$+++ As for making articles accessible to random audiences, I can only wholeheartedly agree.  Some things will inherently be \"well, if you want to know more about this, click on the link,\" but I do want the article to flow well regardless of whether the person clicks for further information.  In fact, I've been arguing just that on the FAC page on a few topics, since I think readers unfamiliar with a topic are aided by things like short sections or repeated wikilinks (since it's not obvious just who random Spanish name X was again).  Same with moving some interesting and catchy material to captions.  If you have any further comments about topics that seem unclear, definitely bring them up.  +++$+++ ::::As for making articles accessible to random audiences, I can only wholeheartedly agree.  Some things will inherently be "well, if you want to know more about this, click on the link," but I do want the article to flow well regardless of whether the person clicks for further information.  In fact, I've been arguing just that on the FAC page on a few topics, since I think readers unfamiliar with a topic are aided by things like short sections or repeated wikilinks (since it's not obvious just who random Spanish name X was again).  Same with moving some interesting and catchy material to captions.  If you have any further comments about topics that seem unclear, definitely bring them up. [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 21:33, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
268989 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268984 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.229940360E09 +++$+++ I think you would not be happy if I copy edited the article. You have a way you want the article, I can see from reading your reactions to comments at the FAC, which is fine. However, that is not a good atmosphere for a copy editor to enter, as I would not want to ask about every change I make.  You would end up being unhappy with what I do, I fear!  Good luck though! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I think you would not be happy if I copy edited the article. You have a way you want the article, I can see from reading your reactions to comments at the FAC, which is fine. However, that is not a good atmosphere for a copy editor to enter, as I would not want to ask about every change I make.  You would end up being unhappy with what I do, I fear!  Good luck though! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
268990 +++$+++ SnowFire +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268984 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-28 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.230467040E09 +++$+++ As for discussing matters...  well, yes, that's what makes a better article though, right?  When I worked with others on copyediting the article before even bringing it to FAC, it was a back and forth endeavaor - we'd chat about each section over IM and discuss what worked, what didn't, and which sections were phrased that way by accident and which ones were intentionally set up that way.  I understand if you're not enthusiastic about it, but I hope this isn't too common - me disagreeing with a potential change doesn't mean I'm dead-set against it, as this is a wiki, after all.  Just some random philosophical thoughts.  +++$+++ ::::::As for discussing matters...  well, yes, that's what makes a better article though, right?  When I worked with others on copyediting the article before even bringing it to FAC, it was a back and forth endeavaor - we'd chat about each section over IM and discuss what worked, what didn't, and which sections were phrased that way by accident and which ones were intentionally set up that way.  I understand if you're not enthusiastic about it, but I hope this isn't too common - me disagreeing with a potential change doesn't mean I'm dead-set against it, as this is a wiki, after all.  Just some random philosophical thoughts. [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 04:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

515241 +++$+++ Thantalteresco +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515241 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-22 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.245659880E09 +++$+++ I am going to bed right now...  +++$+++ I am going to bed right now... [[User:Thantalteresco|Thantalteresco]] ([[User talk:Thantalteresco|talk]]) 01:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
515242 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515241 +++$+++ 515241 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.245665100E09 +++$+++ I see that some sourcing issues have been brought up on the talk page. If those can be addressed, and the sources determined to be reliable, then there shouldn't be any problem re-adding the information. - +++$+++ :I see that some sourcing issues have been brought up on the talk page. If those can be addressed, and the sources determined to be reliable, then there shouldn't be any problem re-adding the information. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 03:05, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
515243 +++$+++ Thantalteresco +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515241 +++$+++ 515242 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 09:27:00 +++$+++ 1.245688020E09 +++$+++ But who will do the job and the discussion there (remember that I have been threatened to be blocked if I ever dare to pop out in the watch list of a blocking admin)? The problem has not been solved. Do you know an editor who might be interested in discussing content in the Infanticide talk page (just one name)?  +++$+++ ::But who will do the job and the discussion there (remember that I have been threatened to be blocked if I ever dare to pop out in the watch list of a blocking admin)? The problem has not been solved. Do you know an editor who might be interested in discussing content in the Infanticide talk page (just one name)? [[User:Thantalteresco|Thantalteresco]] ([[User talk:Thantalteresco|talk]]) 09:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

6843 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6843 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.211012340E09 +++$+++ Kim, do you really believe scientific forecasters would say \"Oh, we think the principles are valid for many fields but not for climate forecasts?\"  Can you really imagine them saying that?  Of course not!  If you want to know what the International Institute of Forecasting thinks about scientific forecasts for climate, try going to their website. [http:\/\/www.forecasters.org\/]  Once there you will note the fields where they are making a contribution, including \"Climate\" in big bold letters at the top of the page. +++$+++ Kim, do you really believe scientific forecasters would say "Oh, we think the principles are valid for many fields but not for climate forecasts?"  Can you really imagine them saying that?  Of course not!  If you want to know what the International Institute of Forecasting thinks about scientific forecasts for climate, try going to their website. [http://www.forecasters.org/]  Once there you will note the fields where they are making a contribution, including "Climate" in big bold letters at the top of the page.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 01:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6844 +++$+++ KimDabelsteinPetersen +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6843 +++$+++ 6843 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.211014080E09 +++$+++ I've asked this before: Can you reference other forecasters than Armstrong who is saying this? Can you answer me why Armstrong isn't publishing this research in forecasting journals - instead of in E&E? -- +++$+++ :I've asked this before: Can you reference other forecasters than Armstrong who is saying this? Can you answer me why Armstrong isn't publishing this research in forecasting journals - instead of in E&E? --[[User:KimDabelsteinPetersen|Kim D. Petersen]] ([[User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen|talk]]) 01:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6845 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6843 +++$+++ 6844 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.211014500E09 +++$+++ Y'know, I'd be really curious to find out how Ron thinks climate models work. This is genuine academically-motivated curiosity, not an attempt to argue a point. I've often wondered about the level of understanding of these things among the public.  +++$+++ ::Y'know, I'd be really curious to find out how Ron thinks climate models work. This is genuine academically-motivated curiosity, not an attempt to argue a point. I've often wondered about the level of understanding of these things among the public. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] ([[User talk:Raymond arritt|talk]]) 01:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6846 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6843 +++$+++ 6845 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 07:17:00 +++$+++ 1.211033820E09 +++$+++ Raymond, my understanding is not great, but probably somewhat better than the public at large.  I have played with EdGCM and ran it on my computer for a while.  It does not produce nearly the number of data points the larger GCMs produce at different atmospheric elevations or pressures.  Basically, the GCMs run a number of differential equations such as Navier-Stokes with different inputs (forcings and parameterizations).  I understand most of the GCMs have very poor documentation and do not explain what equations are being solved or why.  I understand one GCM has excellent documentation (but I have not read it).  I probably know more about the weaknesses of the models than I do about the models themselves.  For example, I know Navier-Stokes does a pretty good job describing laminar flows but is total crap when it comes to turbulent flows resulting from rough topography along the surface.  I know the models are not good at clouds, precipitation, dust, and a number of other factors that are important to weather and climate. I know Roger Pielke has criticized the models for not being sensitive to the initial value problem.  I know none of the 22 major models have any equations to represent the negative feedback found by Roy Spencer over the tropics.  Plus, I am not convinced the inclusion of Spencer's negative feedback would complete the picture.  We just learned about Spencer's negative feedback... so, what else don't we know?  There is no reason to believe the equations being solved by the computers are representative of our climate.  The expressed faith of climate scientists in GCMs is, to me, the height of naivete. +++$+++ :::Raymond, my understanding is not great, but probably somewhat better than the public at large.  I have played with EdGCM and ran it on my computer for a while.  It does not produce nearly the number of data points the larger GCMs produce at different atmospheric elevations or pressures.  Basically, the GCMs run a number of differential equations such as Navier-Stokes with different inputs (forcings and parameterizations).  I understand most of the GCMs have very poor documentation and do not explain what equations are being solved or why.  I understand one GCM has excellent documentation (but I have not read it).  I probably know more about the weaknesses of the models than I do about the models themselves.  For example, I know Navier-Stokes does a pretty good job describing laminar flows but is total crap when it comes to turbulent flows resulting from rough topography along the surface.  I know the models are not good at clouds, precipitation, dust, and a number of other factors that are important to weather and climate. I know Roger Pielke has criticized the models for not being sensitive to the initial value problem.  I know none of the 22 major models have any equations to represent the negative feedback found by Roy Spencer over the tropics.  Plus, I am not convinced the inclusion of Spencer's negative feedback would complete the picture.  We just learned about Spencer's negative feedback... so, what else don't we know?  There is no reason to believe the equations being solved by the computers are representative of our climate.  The expressed faith of climate scientists in GCMs is, to me, the height of naivete.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 07:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6847 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6843 +++$+++ 6846 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.211062500E09 +++$+++ I have a larger question to pose but for the moment I'm curious, what's Spencer's negative feedback?  +++$+++ ::::I have a larger question to pose but for the moment I'm curious, what's Spencer's negative feedback? [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] ([[User talk:Raymond arritt|talk]]) 15:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6848 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6843 +++$+++ 6847 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.211063700E09 +++$+++ Spencer has identified it as the Infrared Iris effect hypothesized by [[Richard Lindzen]].[http:\/\/blog.acton.org\/uploads\/Spencer_07GRL.pdf]  Are you serious?  Did you really not know that?  +++$+++ :::::Spencer has identified it as the Infrared Iris effect hypothesized by [[Richard Lindzen]].[http://blog.acton.org/uploads/Spencer_07GRL.pdf]  Are you serious?  Did you really not know that? [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 15:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6849 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6843 +++$+++ 6848 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.211064900E09 +++$+++ I looked it up. I didn't realize that was the paper you're referring to. The actual GRL paper is so different from your interpretation that at first I didn't recognize it. Anyway, you're completely wrong in stating \"none of the 22 major models have any equations to represent the negative feedback found by Roy Spencer.\" The equations are there; it's a matter of resolution and of improving the interaction between the convective parameterization and grid-scale moist physics.  +++$+++ ::::::I looked it up. I didn't realize that was the paper you're referring to. The actual GRL paper is so different from your interpretation that at first I didn't recognize it. Anyway, you're completely wrong in stating "none of the 22 major models have any equations to represent the negative feedback found by Roy Spencer." The equations are there; it's a matter of resolution and of improving the interaction between the convective parameterization and grid-scale moist physics. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] ([[User talk:Raymond arritt|talk]]) 15:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6850 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6843 +++$+++ 6849 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.211065560E09 +++$+++ I am not wrong unless Spencer is wrong.  Spencer specifically states in his conclusions that the models do not model this negative feedback. And why should they?  The feedback was first observed in 2007. +++$+++ :::::::I am not wrong unless Spencer is wrong.  Spencer specifically states in his conclusions that the models do not model this negative feedback. And why should they?  The feedback was first observed in 2007.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 16:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6851 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6843 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.211067900E09 +++$+++ Where does he \"specifically state in his conclusions that the models do not model this negative feedback\"? Show me please.  All he does is recommend that intraseasonal oscillations be considered when testing models and parameterizations. (The fact that we're ''already'' looking at intraseasonal oscillations when testing models and parameterizations seems to have escaped him -- we have whole conference sessions on things like model performance for the MJO. But that's another issue.)  +++$+++ :::::::::Where does he "specifically state in his conclusions that the models do not model this negative feedback"? Show me please.  All he does is recommend that intraseasonal oscillations be considered when testing models and parameterizations. (The fact that we're ''already'' looking at intraseasonal oscillations when testing models and parameterizations seems to have escaped him -- we have whole conference sessions on things like model performance for the MJO. But that's another issue.) [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] ([[User talk:Raymond arritt|talk]]) 16:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

531134 +++$+++  +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-12 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.278987120E09 +++$+++ Hello RoyalBroil. I have a question about referencing at [[Talk:2010 Toyota\/Save Mart 350\/GA1]], under the \"race\" subsection under the \"detailed review\" header. I was suggesting that Nascar1996 place refs at the beginning of the section to save him from having to reference every sentence\/paragraph. I think I'm just confusing him more. I'd appreciate your take on the matter. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hello RoyalBroil. I have a question about referencing at [[Talk:2010 Toyota/Save Mart 350/GA1]], under the "race" subsection under the "detailed review" header. I was suggesting that Nascar1996 place refs at the beginning of the section to save him from having to reference every sentence/paragraph. I think I'm just confusing him more. I'd appreciate your take on the matter. Thanks, [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] <sup>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Airplaneman|<span style="color:gold;size=2">Review?</span>]]</sup> 19:12, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
531135 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531134 +++$+++ 531134 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.279854720E09 +++$+++ Hello again :). I have answered your questions on [[Wikipedia:Editor review\/Airplaneman|my editor review]]. Thank you for taking the time to review me!  +++$+++ :Hello again :). I have answered your questions on [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Airplaneman|my editor review]]. Thank you for taking the time to review me! [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 20:12, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

525429 +++$+++ Reinoutr +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525429 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-10 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.186764840E09 +++$+++ Cheers, -- +++$+++ Cheers, --[[User:Reinoutr|Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr)]] 09:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
525430 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525429 +++$+++ 525429 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.187569200E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I will try to be more careful about this in the future. -- +++$+++ :Thank you. I will try to be more careful about this in the future. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 17:20, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

268992 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-26 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.230296700E09 +++$+++ Please change as you see fit. I have worked hard over the months to improve the quality of this article and the references, but I am getting tired and losing interest\u2014especially as it takes so long to load! Cheers, &mdash; +++$+++ Please change as you see fit. I have worked hard over the months to improve the quality of this article and the references, but I am getting tired and losing interest—especially as it takes so long to load! Cheers, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 05:05, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
268993 +++$+++ Hordaland +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268992 +++$+++ 268992 +++$+++ 2008-12-26 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.230300540E09 +++$+++ I wonder if the sentence about REM is important to the article (\"tends to be quick to arrive, and intense...\").  If not, I think the whole paragraph in your blockquote above could just be deleted.  I'll suggest that on the talk page and see if anyone objects.  -  +++$+++ :I wonder if the sentence about REM is important to the article ("tends to be quick to arrive, and intense...").  If not, I think the whole paragraph in your blockquote above could just be deleted.  I'll suggest that on the talk page and see if anyone objects.  - [[User:Hordaland|Hordaland]] ([[User talk:Hordaland|talk]]) 06:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
268994 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268992 +++$+++ 268993 +++$+++ 2008-12-26 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.230301500E09 +++$+++ REM it is not mentioned elsewhere in the article. I don't remember REM info  \"tends to be quick to arrive, and intense...\") as particularly of note. It is not routinely asked about in a clinical assessment, for example, or mental status exam.  Without something more substantial than that vague mention, I don't see the relevance of throwing it in the article without some follow up. Obviously sleep in general is important, and that is mentioned and referenced.  I recall that some types of antidepressant drugs increase REM sleep, but there is no reference  in the article, and that is considered a \"side effect\". Personally, I don't think the statement adds any solid info and its removal would not lessen the relevance of any information in the article.  Cheers, &mdash; +++$+++ ::REM it is not mentioned elsewhere in the article. I don't remember REM info  "tends to be quick to arrive, and intense...") as particularly of note. It is not routinely asked about in a clinical assessment, for example, or mental status exam.  Without something more substantial than that vague mention, I don't see the relevance of throwing it in the article without some follow up. Obviously sleep in general is important, and that is mentioned and referenced.  I recall that some types of antidepressant drugs increase REM sleep, but there is no reference  in the article, and that is considered a "side effect". Personally, I don't think the statement adds any solid info and its removal would not lessen the relevance of any information in the article.  Cheers, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 06:25, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

531137 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-13 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.279012920E09 +++$+++ Do you believe if this article continues down this path that it may become a featured article? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996| <span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue\">Contributions<\/span>]] \/  +++$+++ Do you believe if this article continues down this path that it may become a featured article? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996| <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Contributions</span>]] / [[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook#Sign Here|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Guestbook</span>]]''</sup> 02:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
531138 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531137 +++$+++ 531137 +++$+++ 2010-07-13 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.279016220E09 +++$+++ I think it's a fair distance off the mark after doing a quick check. Why use the Formula One term classification for the results section? I think it should be renamed. Maybe \"results\"? '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I think it's a fair distance off the mark after doing a quick check. Why use the Formula One term classification for the results section? I think it should be renamed. Maybe "results"? '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
531139 +++$+++  +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531137 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-17 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.279367100E09 +++$+++ As the reviewer, I agree. Renaming accordingly\u2026  +++$+++ :::As the reviewer, I agree. Renaming accordingly… [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] <sup>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Airplaneman|<span style="color:gold;size=2">Review?</span>]]</sup> 04:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
531140 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531137 +++$+++ 531138 +++$+++ 2010-07-13 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.279016880E09 +++$+++ Featured article. I thought it wasn't close, but it not far away either. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996| <span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue\">Contributions<\/span>]] \/  +++$+++ ::Featured article. I thought it wasn't close, but it not far away either. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996| <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Contributions</span>]] / [[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook#Sign Here|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Guestbook</span>]]''</sup> 03:28, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
531141 +++$+++  +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531137 +++$+++ 531140 +++$+++ 2010-07-17 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.279366980E09 +++$+++ It will need work, especially with the referencing (more 3rd party sources). Other thoughts include fleshing out the prose. BTW, RoyalBroil, can Nascar1996 get [[WP:AUTOREVIEWER|Autoreviewer]] rights (does he qualify)? I am not sure if he has created the recommended 75 articles, but he creates frequently and we can trust that the pages aren't bad.  +++$+++ :::It will need work, especially with the referencing (more 3rd party sources). Other thoughts include fleshing out the prose. BTW, RoyalBroil, can Nascar1996 get [[WP:AUTOREVIEWER|Autoreviewer]] rights (does he qualify)? I am not sure if he has created the recommended 75 articles, but he creates frequently and we can trust that the pages aren't bad. [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] <sup>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Airplaneman|<span style="color:gold;size=2">Review?</span>]]</sup> 04:43, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
531142 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531137 +++$+++ 531141 +++$+++ 2010-07-17 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.279367280E09 +++$+++ Included redirects then yes, otherwise I have only created about 25-30 articles. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996| <span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue\">Contributions<\/span>]] \/  +++$+++ ::::Included redirects then yes, otherwise I have only created about 25-30 articles. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996| <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Contributions</span>]] / [[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook#Sign Here|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Guestbook</span>]]''</sup> 04:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

268995 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-26 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.230341700E09 +++$+++ I'm confused.  I was talking about the 15 opposes I got based on my using the term \"for shit\" on my talk page.  What did that have to do with you?  Maybe my brain is still fogged, but I'm not clear why you are offended.  You have been a great help and I have no wish whatsoever to offend you.  Please respond either here or on my talk page.-- +++$+++ I'm confused.  I was talking about the 15 opposes I got based on my using the term "for shit" on my talk page.  What did that have to do with you?  Maybe my brain is still fogged, but I'm not clear why you are offended.  You have been a great help and I have no wish whatsoever to offend you.  Please respond either here or on my talk page.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 17:35, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
268996 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268995 +++$+++ 268995 +++$+++ 2008-12-26 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.230342540E09 +++$+++ from [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Wehwalt]]: \"I was willing to overlook the number of times he has questioned my good faith or honesty, but indirectly soliciting 3RR backup [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=257649359&oldid=257642880] compels me to oppose at this time.\" (Maybe I am too sensitive!) Cheers, &mdash; +++$+++ :from [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Wehwalt]]: "I was willing to overlook the number of times he has questioned my good faith or honesty, but indirectly soliciting 3RR backup [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=257649359&oldid=257642880] compels me to oppose at this time." (Maybe I am too sensitive!) Cheers, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:49, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
268997 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268995 +++$+++ 268996 +++$+++ 2008-12-26 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.230342840E09 +++$+++ Since no one took up Sandy's cause and AuburnPilot strongly defended me and you, I saw no need to say anything.  I was told that anything that the candidate says during the RfA process is potential fodder for the opposes.  That is why I was very choosy in replying to the opposes.  I had no idea you were offended by my not replying, and I thought I made it clear after the RfA closed that I valued, and value your contributions and, well, wikifriendship greatly.  Frankly, I was about to ask you for your help, I'm planning on bringing [[Rudolf Wolters]] at the least up to GA standard.  I'm not sure the material is there for FA, but at least to GA.  What is there now is garbage (I've started some work).-- +++$+++ ::Since no one took up Sandy's cause and AuburnPilot strongly defended me and you, I saw no need to say anything.  I was told that anything that the candidate says during the RfA process is potential fodder for the opposes.  That is why I was very choosy in replying to the opposes.  I had no idea you were offended by my not replying, and I thought I made it clear after the RfA closed that I valued, and value your contributions and, well, wikifriendship greatly.  Frankly, I was about to ask you for your help, I'm planning on bringing [[Rudolf Wolters]] at the least up to GA standard.  I'm not sure the material is there for FA, but at least to GA.  What is there now is garbage (I've started some work).--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 17:54, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
268998 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268995 +++$+++ 268997 +++$+++ 2008-12-26 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.230343380E09 +++$+++ I certainly will be willing to help you. I was being oversensitive. Sorry!  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I certainly will be willing to help you. I was being oversensitive. Sorry!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:03, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
268999 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 268995 +++$+++ 268998 +++$+++ 2008-12-26 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.230344100E09 +++$+++ I'm glad.  Thank you.  I am sorry if I did not catch on to the fact that you were offended, RfA is a difficult process.  Sandy went so over the top on her drama that I think she scared off potential opposes who just didn't want to be associated with the drama.  Anyway, on Wolters.  Next few days, I'm planning to bring in material from the Speer bios.  I could use online sources, photographs, anything like that, as well as copyediting and advice.  Basically all I intend to keep from what is there now is his vital statistics and bibliography.  Sereny is probably the best source for Wolters, I will be drawing heavily from her book on Speer.-- +++$+++ ::::I'm glad.  Thank you.  I am sorry if I did not catch on to the fact that you were offended, RfA is a difficult process.  Sandy went so over the top on her drama that I think she scared off potential opposes who just didn't want to be associated with the drama.  Anyway, on Wolters.  Next few days, I'm planning to bring in material from the Speer bios.  I could use online sources, photographs, anything like that, as well as copyediting and advice.  Basically all I intend to keep from what is there now is his vital statistics and bibliography.  Sereny is probably the best source for Wolters, I will be drawing heavily from her book on Speer.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 18:15, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

6852 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6852 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-17 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.211069160E09 +++$+++ Raymond, Spencer wrote: \"Since these intraseasonal oscillations represent a dominant mode of convective variability in the tropical troposphere, their behavior should be considered when testing the convective and cloud parameterizations in climate models that are used to predict global warming.\"  It is clear he is making a recommendation to change the models here.  It is possible to model intraseasonal oscillations but have the wrong sign on the feedback. I believe the models do exactly that at present. If you can find a model that has a negative feedback, it certainly is not strong enough to match observations. +++$+++ Raymond, Spencer wrote: "Since these intraseasonal oscillations represent a dominant mode of convective variability in the tropical troposphere, their behavior should be considered when testing the convective and cloud parameterizations in climate models that are used to predict global warming."  It is clear he is making a recommendation to change the models here.  It is possible to model intraseasonal oscillations but have the wrong sign on the feedback. I believe the models do exactly that at present. If you can find a model that has a negative feedback, it certainly is not strong enough to match observations.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 17:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6853 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6852 +++$+++ 6852 +++$+++ 2008-05-18 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.211129160E09 +++$+++ To reinforce what I wrote below: The models do not have a parameter \"tropical cloud feedback\" that you set to +3.1415 or -2.7183 to match observed behaviour. Rather, if the model is detailed enough, the feedback will be observed as emerging behaviour of the simple physical properties modeled with differential equations. -- +++$+++ :To reinforce what I wrote below: The models do not have a parameter "tropical cloud feedback" that you set to +3.1415 or -2.7183 to match observed behaviour. Rather, if the model is detailed enough, the feedback will be observed as emerging behaviour of the simple physical properties modeled with differential equations. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 09:46, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
6854 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6852 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.211067180E09 +++$+++ ...and here you fall into the Armstrong trap. It's a feature of real physical models that they can predict effects not yet observed. You do not just pick any mathematical model, and tweak the parameters until they fit the observations. Your equations describe real, physical processes. If they fail to predict an effect that is observed (and validated), that may be because the model resolution is insufficient, or because some boundary effects have been overlooked, or because some aspect are not modeled that turn out to be significant. It's usually not because your base model is completely unsupported and just fit by accident. -- +++$+++ ::::::::...and here you fall into the Armstrong trap. It's a feature of real physical models that they can predict effects not yet observed. You do not just pick any mathematical model, and tweak the parameters until they fit the observations. Your equations describe real, physical processes. If they fail to predict an effect that is observed (and validated), that may be because the model resolution is insufficient, or because some boundary effects have been overlooked, or because some aspect are not modeled that turn out to be significant. It's usually not because your base model is completely unsupported and just fit by accident. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 16:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

6855 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-17 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.211069340E09 +++$+++ Stephan, we are not discussing Armstrong at present.  I understand tuning models.  Who was it that said \"Give me six parameters and I can fit an elephant?\"  I can't remember, but the point stands.  Being able to fit history does not mean you have any predictive power.  Read what Pielke wrote.  A GCM is an hypothesis.  It cannot predict anything.  +++$+++ Stephan, we are not discussing Armstrong at present.  I understand tuning models.  Who was it that said "Give me six parameters and I can fit an elephant?"  I can't remember, but the point stands.  Being able to fit history does not mean you have any predictive power.  Read what Pielke wrote.  A GCM is an hypothesis.  It cannot predict anything. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 17:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
6856 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6855 +++$+++ 6855 +++$+++ 2008-05-18 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.211129160E09 +++$+++ Your error (and Armstrong's) is that you don't understand the nature of the models, or at least not the implications of their nature. Here is a simple model equation with 6 parameters: h(x)=sin (ax+bx<sup>2<\/sup>+cx<sup>3<\/sup>+dx<sup>4<\/sup>+ex<sup>5<\/sup>+fx<sup>6<\/sup>). Now go ahead and use that to fit the behavior of a body accelerated in a constant gravitational field, usually described by h(t)=0.5at<sup>2<\/sup> -- +++$+++ :Your error (and Armstrong's) is that you don't understand the nature of the models, or at least not the implications of their nature. Here is a simple model equation with 6 parameters: h(x)=sin (ax+bx<sup>2</sup>+cx<sup>3</sup>+dx<sup>4</sup>+ex<sup>5</sup>+fx<sup>6</sup>). Now go ahead and use that to fit the behavior of a body accelerated in a constant gravitational field, usually described by h(t)=0.5at<sup>2</sup> --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 09:46, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
6857 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6855 +++$+++ 6856 +++$+++ 2008-05-18 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.211143620E09 +++$+++ I'm not a mathematician.  Your mistake is in believing the math, in any way, can predict nature.  Have you read the book \"Useless Arithmetic\"?  Or have you read Pielke's writings on why GCM's cannot predict anything? +++$+++ ::I'm not a mathematician.  Your mistake is in believing the math, in any way, can predict nature.  Have you read the book "Useless Arithmetic"?  Or have you read Pielke's writings on why GCM's cannot predict anything?[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 13:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
6858 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6855 +++$+++ 6857 +++$+++ 2008-05-18 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.211146800E09 +++$+++ Indeed, I belief that math can predict nature, and I'm proven right every time a space probe reaches another planet, or an airplane lifts up, or a car crumbles just right to not kill the inhabitants in a collision, or someone transmits 53kBit\/s, but never 106kBit\/s over a legal German modem line. Of course you have to understand the nature and limits of the model you apply - we cannot predict ''every'' particular bend in the sheet metal, or which nucleus in a large U235 mass will spontaneously decay and start the chain reaction. But even in systems described stochastically, we can often make strong predictions about the possible end states and their distribution. -- +++$+++ :::Indeed, I belief that math can predict nature, and I'm proven right every time a space probe reaches another planet, or an airplane lifts up, or a car crumbles just right to not kill the inhabitants in a collision, or someone transmits 53kBit/s, but never 106kBit/s over a legal German modem line. Of course you have to understand the nature and limits of the model you apply - we cannot predict ''every'' particular bend in the sheet metal, or which nucleus in a large U235 mass will spontaneously decay and start the chain reaction. But even in systems described stochastically, we can often make strong predictions about the possible end states and their distribution. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 14:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
6859 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6855 +++$+++ 6858 +++$+++ 2008-05-18 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.211147460E09 +++$+++ I do not think of a car crash or space travel as \"nature.\"  I had in mind the limited idea of \"climate\" which is a complicated system we are still learning about.  As Pielke says, a GCM is an hypothesis.  An hypothesis has to be tested against observations.  GCMs are not evidence of anything and cannot predict anything.  People have been testing the GCMs against observations and they have not done well.  Wikipedia readers interested in the global warming controversy will want to know about the test results of the GCMs.  There is no reason to censor this information and keep it from readers. +++$+++ ::::I do not think of a car crash or space travel as "nature."  I had in mind the limited idea of "climate" which is a complicated system we are still learning about.  As Pielke says, a GCM is an hypothesis.  An hypothesis has to be tested against observations.  GCMs are not evidence of anything and cannot predict anything.  People have been testing the GCMs against observations and they have not done well.  Wikipedia readers interested in the global warming controversy will want to know about the test results of the GCMs.  There is no reason to censor this information and keep it from readers.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 14:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
6860 +++$+++ infonation101 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6855 +++$+++ 6858 +++$+++ 2008-05-25 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.211774160E09 +++$+++ Stephan, I agree that models can give us an idea of what will happen in certain situations, but there is never certainty.  The complete axiomatic basis of mathematics is some sister of faith.  Furthermore, why can weathermen only predict at most 7-10 days of forecasting in a local region and climatologists believe they can predict the next 10 or even 50 years of global climate?  For me this has always been a paradox.  All the combine databases in the world still don't have enough memory or power to model the discrete happening of nature around the globe well enough to predict something of this sort.  Because of this we have to rely on statistical methods for long term projections that quickly become deluded.  Even if your beginning parameters were correct to almost precision, because they are not perfect they will quickly deviate from the true circumstance.  We can understand how the individual natural laws work, but when you combine hundreds of those the model is just too intense.  Go back to the IPCC's first report and compare how they thought the following 17 years would be.  Then compare that to today's datasets.  Not near what they thought.  The computers have improved, and a few more equations have been created, but still not enough to think we can predict the weather in this fashion.  The math and modeling of climate still has much to be desired.  +++$+++ ::::Stephan, I agree that models can give us an idea of what will happen in certain situations, but there is never certainty.  The complete axiomatic basis of mathematics is some sister of faith.  Furthermore, why can weathermen only predict at most 7-10 days of forecasting in a local region and climatologists believe they can predict the next 10 or even 50 years of global climate?  For me this has always been a paradox.  All the combine databases in the world still don't have enough memory or power to model the discrete happening of nature around the globe well enough to predict something of this sort.  Because of this we have to rely on statistical methods for long term projections that quickly become deluded.  Even if your beginning parameters were correct to almost precision, because they are not perfect they will quickly deviate from the true circumstance.  We can understand how the individual natural laws work, but when you combine hundreds of those the model is just too intense.  Go back to the IPCC's first report and compare how they thought the following 17 years would be.  Then compare that to today's datasets.  Not near what they thought.  The computers have improved, and a few more equations have been created, but still not enough to think we can predict the weather in this fashion.  The math and modeling of climate still has much to be desired. [[User:infonation101|<font color="#1b71db"><b>InfoNation</b><sup>101</sup></font>]] | [[User Talk:infonation101|<font color="#e7a844">talk</font>]] | 20:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
6861 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6855 +++$+++ 6860 +++$+++ 2008-05-25 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.211779920E09 +++$+++ If you don't understand the difference between weather and climate prediction, you must have carefully avoided a large part of the discussion. I've seen this argument a few hundred times, and the answer is always the same. You may not be able to predict a particular event (weather), but you can predict the distribution of events (climate). The trivial example is throwing a coin. Assuming it's a Laplace-coin, I can never predict the outcome of the next throw (or the one 2000 throws down the line). But I can with a high accuracy predict the proportion of heads or tails over the next 1000 throws. Inexact initial conditions and errors in approximation do play a large role if your system is unstable or even chaotic. But the climate (not weather) models are reasonably well-behaved. Given constant forcings, it will usually converge on very similar states in the long run. I don't have the first IPCC report at hand, but as far as I can tell from cites and reports I have seen, nearly all of the predictions are still compatible with our current observations. The concrete emission scenarios have been modified (the 1990 report had not fully incorporated the collapse of the Eastern Block industries), but the climate sensitivities and overall projections are very similar to what we think is right today.  -- +++$+++ :::::If you don't understand the difference between weather and climate prediction, you must have carefully avoided a large part of the discussion. I've seen this argument a few hundred times, and the answer is always the same. You may not be able to predict a particular event (weather), but you can predict the distribution of events (climate). The trivial example is throwing a coin. Assuming it's a Laplace-coin, I can never predict the outcome of the next throw (or the one 2000 throws down the line). But I can with a high accuracy predict the proportion of heads or tails over the next 1000 throws. Inexact initial conditions and errors in approximation do play a large role if your system is unstable or even chaotic. But the climate (not weather) models are reasonably well-behaved. Given constant forcings, it will usually converge on very similar states in the long run. I don't have the first IPCC report at hand, but as far as I can tell from cites and reports I have seen, nearly all of the predictions are still compatible with our current observations. The concrete emission scenarios have been modified (the 1990 report had not fully incorporated the collapse of the Eastern Block industries), but the climate sensitivities and overall projections are very similar to what we think is right today.  --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 22:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
6862 +++$+++ infonation101 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6855 +++$+++ 6858 +++$+++ 2008-05-27 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.211928840E09 +++$+++ Pielke Jr. from the University of Colorado has compiled this information [http:\/\/sciencepolicy.colorado.edu\/prometheus\/archives\/climate_change\/001317verification_of_1990.html here].  As you can see the IPCC AR1 was high.  If you create a linear regression of the temperature starting 1990 the line follows just under the IPCC's lowest predicted average, and while the amount of CO<sub>2<\/sub> has been at the high end of the projections, we are receiving mixed interpretations.  The reason is because the IPCC has greatly over estimated the amount of influence CO<sub>2<\/sub> in the atmosphere.  Might we also remember that even though the ppm has gone from around 300 to 600, that is still only .03% to .04% of the total atmosphere.  How about one idea that I have never seen introduced.  Because almost all the heat that we receive comes from the sun, wouldn't it almost seem painfully obvious that any fluctuation in the sun's surface temperature would be felt here on earth?  So simple it almost sounds stupid.  Funny thing, if you look at the sun surface temperature since 1970 it was also going up, with a high spike in 1998, then has been declining since then.  Hm, it's interesting that the average temperature for the last 9-10 years is also declining, but there is still never given any attribution.  The models are highly flawed, and the IPCC would never be able to predict even the next 10 years of climate change (as they have already shown) little more the next 50 years.  +++$+++ ::::Pielke Jr. from the University of Colorado has compiled this information [http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/climate_change/001317verification_of_1990.html here].  As you can see the IPCC AR1 was high.  If you create a linear regression of the temperature starting 1990 the line follows just under the IPCC's lowest predicted average, and while the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> has been at the high end of the projections, we are receiving mixed interpretations.  The reason is because the IPCC has greatly over estimated the amount of influence CO<sub>2</sub> in the atmosphere.  Might we also remember that even though the ppm has gone from around 300 to 600, that is still only .03% to .04% of the total atmosphere.  How about one idea that I have never seen introduced.  Because almost all the heat that we receive comes from the sun, wouldn't it almost seem painfully obvious that any fluctuation in the sun's surface temperature would be felt here on earth?  So simple it almost sounds stupid.  Funny thing, if you look at the sun surface temperature since 1970 it was also going up, with a high spike in 1998, then has been declining since then.  Hm, it's interesting that the average temperature for the last 9-10 years is also declining, but there is still never given any attribution.  The models are highly flawed, and the IPCC would never be able to predict even the next 10 years of climate change (as they have already shown) little more the next 50 years. [[User:infonation101|<font color="#1b71db"><b>InfoNation</b><sup>101</sup></font>]] | [[User Talk:infonation101|<font color="#e7a844">talk</font>]] | 15:54, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

269000 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-27 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.230438480E09 +++$+++ The article is taking shape well.  One problem is that it is hard to make avoid making it another article about Speer.-- +++$+++ The article is taking shape well.  One problem is that it is hard to make avoid making it another article about Speer.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 20:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
269001 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269000 +++$+++ 269000 +++$+++ 2008-12-27 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.230440340E09 +++$+++ I am unclear why the relationship between Wolters and Speer became embittered. I am gathering, from what you have written, that it was a one way street, and that Speer held something against Wolters.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I am unclear why the relationship between Wolters and Speer became embittered. I am gathering, from what you have written, that it was a one way street, and that Speer held something against Wolters.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
269002 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269000 +++$+++ 269001 +++$+++ 2008-12-27 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.230443640E09 +++$+++ From the way Speer's biographers present it, Speer took Wolters for granted and failed to show very much gratitude for all Wolters had done for him.  In addition, they disagreed over Speer's taking responsibility; Wolters felt that Speer repainted the past to make the points he wanted to make.  There were other things as well.  I'll detail them all when I get to that part of the story which should be tomorrow.  I've ordered a copy of the Schmidt book because he actually interviewed Wolters directly.-- +++$+++ ::From the way Speer's biographers present it, Speer took Wolters for granted and failed to show very much gratitude for all Wolters had done for him.  In addition, they disagreed over Speer's taking responsibility; Wolters felt that Speer repainted the past to make the points he wanted to make.  There were other things as well.  I'll detail them all when I get to that part of the story which should be tomorrow.  I've ordered a copy of the Schmidt book because he actually interviewed Wolters directly.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
269003 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269000 +++$+++ 269002 +++$+++ 2008-12-27 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.230449460E09 +++$+++ Maybe it will be about Wolters' view of Speer, if that is Wolters primary reason for being of interest. (Was he much of an architect?) Perhaps some exploration of how Wolters managed over the years to remain loyal and only at the end became bitter. Although his disillusionment over Speer's failure to take responsibility is a reason, somehow to me there must be more. You said he continued to support him after the trials.  And he had to have known Speer as a person enough not to be that surprised at Speer's behavior. How did he go along with what was happening all those years himself, I wonder? (Regarding the RFA, I wasn't offended that you did not respond, as I agree that not responding is the best policy in those situations. I was just very surprised at the change against me, and could not understand how what I did could be construed that way. So for a while I was confused and fearful of making posts that may unintentionally harm someone. It was a little scary that someone was monitoring my posts to such an extent that such a post would be used to insinuate I was doing something unethical.)  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Maybe it will be about Wolters' view of Speer, if that is Wolters primary reason for being of interest. (Was he much of an architect?) Perhaps some exploration of how Wolters managed over the years to remain loyal and only at the end became bitter. Although his disillusionment over Speer's failure to take responsibility is a reason, somehow to me there must be more. You said he continued to support him after the trials.  And he had to have known Speer as a person enough not to be that surprised at Speer's behavior. How did he go along with what was happening all those years himself, I wonder? (Regarding the RFA, I wasn't offended that you did not respond, as I agree that not responding is the best policy in those situations. I was just very surprised at the change against me, and could not understand how what I did could be construed that way. So for a while I was confused and fearful of making posts that may unintentionally harm someone. It was a little scary that someone was monitoring my posts to such an extent that such a post would be used to insinuate I was doing something unethical.)  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:31, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
269004 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269000 +++$+++ 269002 +++$+++ 2008-12-27 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.230449700E09 +++$+++ Actually, he was more concerned that Speer was slanting history the ''other'' way.  I've added a couple of paragraphs to the post release section.  Sandy almost certainly had my talk page on watchlist, or else when she found out I was going for Admin, she went through my talk page with a fine tooth comb looking for dirt.  We had a lot of disputes at TFA\/R and at Natalee Holloway.  She doesn't like me, though she is sucking up to me now, just in case, I think (I am not ambitious and wasn't even interested in being an admin, frankly, I'm an article writer).  She wasn't monitoring you, she just leapt on it with glad cries, and as I've pointed out, went way over the top.  There are a lot of vultures hovering just in case SHE ever decides to run for admin, it would be a bloodbath!-- +++$+++ :::Actually, he was more concerned that Speer was slanting history the ''other'' way.  I've added a couple of paragraphs to the post release section.  Sandy almost certainly had my talk page on watchlist, or else when she found out I was going for Admin, she went through my talk page with a fine tooth comb looking for dirt.  We had a lot of disputes at TFA/R and at Natalee Holloway.  She doesn't like me, though she is sucking up to me now, just in case, I think (I am not ambitious and wasn't even interested in being an admin, frankly, I'm an article writer).  She wasn't monitoring you, she just leapt on it with glad cries, and as I've pointed out, went way over the top.  There are a lot of vultures hovering just in case SHE ever decides to run for admin, it would be a bloodbath!--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 23:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
269005 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269000 +++$+++ 269004 +++$+++ 2008-12-27 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.230450300E09 +++$+++ Slanting history the \"other\" way? You mean minimizing what happened? If that is the case, that is indeed interesting. It would make for complicated historical dynamic.  (I would be very much against Sandy running for admin, as I perceive her as too biased, protecting those who are \"hers\" and inexplicably trashing others who, I guess, have not toed the line.)  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Slanting history the "other" way? You mean minimizing what happened? If that is the case, that is indeed interesting. It would make for complicated historical dynamic.  (I would be very much against Sandy running for admin, as I perceive her as too biased, protecting those who are "hers" and inexplicably trashing others who, I guess, have not toed the line.)  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
269006 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269000 +++$+++ 269005 +++$+++ 2008-12-27 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.230450540E09 +++$+++ Yeah, the latest quote I put in there, he's mad at Speer for demonizing Hitler.-- +++$+++ :::::Yeah, the latest quote I put in there, he's mad at Speer for demonizing Hitler.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 23:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
269007 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269000 +++$+++ 269006 +++$+++ 2008-12-28 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.230458580E09 +++$+++ All the basic info is in there.  It needs a lot of polish to be easy on the reader's eye and mind, but it is basically complete.  My mind hurts.-- +++$+++ ::::::All the basic info is in there.  It needs a lot of polish to be easy on the reader's eye and mind, but it is basically complete.  My mind hurts.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 02:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
269008 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269000 +++$+++ 269007 +++$+++ 2008-12-28 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.230459120E09 +++$+++ OK. Will look at tomorrow as too tired tonight. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::OK. Will look at tomorrow as too tired tonight. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:12, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

531146 +++$+++ The359 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-01 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.280711700E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_24_Hours_of_Le_Mans_winners&action=history Back at it once again].  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_24_Hours_of_Le_Mans_winners&action=history Back at it once again]. [[User:The359|<font color="#004400">The<sup>3</sup>5<sub>9</sub></font>]] ([[User talk:The359|<font color="#004400"><b>Talk</b></font>]]) 18:15, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
531147 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531146 +++$+++ 531146 +++$+++ 2010-08-02 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.280776380E09 +++$+++ Done. I wouldn't have put up with this much garage, maybe half of that much, before I would be reporting it. I'm happy to help. Keep me informed if this happens again and I'll come up with a better solution. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Done. I wouldn't have put up with this much garage, maybe half of that much, before I would be reporting it. I'm happy to help. Keep me informed if this happens again and I'll come up with a better solution. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

531148 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531148 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-04 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.280953860E09 +++$+++ I had a minor problem with the various Wisconsin infoboxes: various villages were mislabel as towns. As you know many of the Wisconsin towns have the same names as the cities and villages-hence the confusion and mislabeling. Also many of the Wisconsin towns articles do not have any infoboxes and this adds to the confusion. As always I hope you are doing well-many thanks- +++$+++ I had a minor problem with the various Wisconsin infoboxes: various villages were mislabel as towns. As you know many of the Wisconsin towns have the same names as the cities and villages-hence the confusion and mislabeling. Also many of the Wisconsin towns articles do not have any infoboxes and this adds to the confusion. As always I hope you are doing well-many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:31, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
531149 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531148 +++$+++ 531148 +++$+++ 2010-08-05 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.281001620E09 +++$+++ I hope that you're fixing both of these problems as you find them or at least keep a list. Good job! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I hope that you're fixing both of these problems as you find them or at least keep a list. Good job! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

6863 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-26 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.211811900E09 +++$+++ Stephan, this is typical cross-talk.  We always get the weather vs climate lecture whenever we point out that computer models cannot predict climate 100 years into the future.  Believe me when I say we understand the difference between weather and climate. The only way one can believe the models can predict climate 100 years into the future is to believe CO2 is the prime driver of climate variation.  If you look at any reasonable temperature reconstruction (one prior to Mann or one that rejects strip bark tree rings), you will see our planet has had lots of natural climate variation in the last 1,000 years.  What caused all of that climate variation?  We really don't know because the IPCC is focused only on studying human-induced climate change and no one is studying natural climate variation anymore.  But we do know that computer models cannot produce reliable predictions.  Also, your claim that IPCC climate sensitivities are very similar to what we think is right today is not accurate.  Both Schwartz and Chylek published after the AR4 cutoff date and their papers were not used by the IPCC.  +++$+++ Stephan, this is typical cross-talk.  We always get the weather vs climate lecture whenever we point out that computer models cannot predict climate 100 years into the future.  Believe me when I say we understand the difference between weather and climate. The only way one can believe the models can predict climate 100 years into the future is to believe CO2 is the prime driver of climate variation.  If you look at any reasonable temperature reconstruction (one prior to Mann or one that rejects strip bark tree rings), you will see our planet has had lots of natural climate variation in the last 1,000 years.  What caused all of that climate variation?  We really don't know because the IPCC is focused only on studying human-induced climate change and no one is studying natural climate variation anymore.  But we do know that computer models cannot produce reliable predictions.  Also, your claim that IPCC climate sensitivities are very similar to what we think is right today is not accurate.  Both Schwartz and Chylek published after the AR4 cutoff date and their papers were not used by the IPCC. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 07:25, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
6864 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6863 +++$+++ 6863 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.211815140E09 +++$+++ I did not bring up the weather vs. climate story. Do we agree that this argument \"the weatherman is often wrong, therefore we cannot predict climate\" is wrong and therefore should not be used? Yes, our planet has had a lot of climate variability, and ''of course'' scientists look at the reasons for this. Why do you think we do [[ice core]] work going back hundreds of thousands of years? No, we do not know that computer models cannot produce reliable predictions. That depends entirely on the domain, the models, and the assumptions. All of the IPCC predictions are, of course, based on certain assumptions about greenhouse gas emissions and other climate forcings. If you disregard the assumptions, sure, your prediction break. \"If a car hits my bicycle (while I'm riding it, at reasonable speeds...other unspoken assumptions), I will be injured\" is not the same as \"I will be injured\". For a famous case see the Hansen predictions and their misuse. And yes, sorry for the imprecision. When I wrote \"what we think is right today\", I was referring to the opinion of the scientific community as represented in the IPCC reports. -- +++$+++ :I did not bring up the weather vs. climate story. Do we agree that this argument "the weatherman is often wrong, therefore we cannot predict climate" is wrong and therefore should not be used? Yes, our planet has had a lot of climate variability, and ''of course'' scientists look at the reasons for this. Why do you think we do [[ice core]] work going back hundreds of thousands of years? No, we do not know that computer models cannot produce reliable predictions. That depends entirely on the domain, the models, and the assumptions. All of the IPCC predictions are, of course, based on certain assumptions about greenhouse gas emissions and other climate forcings. If you disregard the assumptions, sure, your prediction break. "If a car hits my bicycle (while I'm riding it, at reasonable speeds...other unspoken assumptions), I will be injured" is not the same as "I will be injured". For a famous case see the Hansen predictions and their misuse. And yes, sorry for the imprecision. When I wrote "what we think is right today", I was referring to the opinion of the scientific community as represented in the IPCC reports. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 08:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
6865 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6863 +++$+++ 6864 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.211838900E09 +++$+++ Stephan, no I do not agree the argument \"the weatherman is often wrong, therefore we cannot predict climate\" is wrong and therefore should not be used.  The argument is often presented to me that \"the weatherman is often right, and climate predictions are based on the same type of computer models as weather predictions, so we can also predict climate.\"  I reject that idea completely.  Weather predictions are good for a week or so.  Weather predictions will NEVER be accurate for two weeks no matter the computer power addressing the problem.  The system is too chaotic.  And so is climate.  You do not even know what climate forcings are being neglected by your models.  We know the models do not factor in the negative feedback observed by Spencer.  But what else is left out?  Pielke has written about this.  A computer model is an hypothesis.  That's all.  The ability to hindcast means nothing.  Anyone can tune a model to fit previous patterns but that gives it no predictive skill at all.  +++$+++ ::Stephan, no I do not agree the argument "the weatherman is often wrong, therefore we cannot predict climate" is wrong and therefore should not be used.  The argument is often presented to me that "the weatherman is often right, and climate predictions are based on the same type of computer models as weather predictions, so we can also predict climate."  I reject that idea completely.  Weather predictions are good for a week or so.  Weather predictions will NEVER be accurate for two weeks no matter the computer power addressing the problem.  The system is too chaotic.  And so is climate.  You do not even know what climate forcings are being neglected by your models.  We know the models do not factor in the negative feedback observed by Spencer.  But what else is left out?  Pielke has written about this.  A computer model is an hypothesis.  That's all.  The ability to hindcast means nothing.  Anyone can tune a model to fit previous patterns but that gives it no predictive skill at all. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 14:55, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

525432 +++$+++ Tomifly +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525432 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-14 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.187113980E09 +++$+++ <br \/> +++$+++ <br />[[User:Tomifly|Tomifly]] 10:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
525433 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525432 +++$+++ 525432 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.187127420E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your references. I have added them to the [[bilirubin]] article. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for your references. I have added them to the [[bilirubin]] article. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 14:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

6866 +++$+++ BozMo +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-04 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.217882460E09 +++$+++ I think you are right about including this one. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlobal_warming_controversy&diff=229773175&oldid=229770243] anyway thanks for finding the reference I enjoyed the paper. -- +++$+++ I think you are right about including this one. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlobal_warming_controversy&diff=229773175&oldid=229770243] anyway thanks for finding the reference I enjoyed the paper. --[[User:BozMo|BozMo]] [[user talk:BozMo|talk]] 13:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
6867 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6866 +++$+++ 6866 +++$+++ 2008-08-04 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.217883600E09 +++$+++ Thank you for saying so.  If it is deleted again, will you say so on the Talk page?  +++$+++ :Thank you for saying so.  If it is deleted again, will you say so on the Talk page? [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 14:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
6868 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6866 +++$+++ 6867 +++$+++ 2008-08-04 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.217883720E09 +++$+++ I just read your comment on the Talk page.  Thank you. +++$+++ ::I just read your comment on the Talk page.  Thank you.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 14:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
6869 +++$+++ BozMo +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6866 +++$+++ 6868 +++$+++ 2008-08-05 07:17:00 +++$+++ 1.217945820E09 +++$+++ And the answer would have been \"with pleasure\". Happy editing -- +++$+++ :::And the answer would have been "with pleasure". Happy editing --[[User:BozMo|BozMo]] [[user talk:BozMo|talk]] 07:17, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

288102 +++$+++ Xihix +++$+++ NSR77 +++$+++ 288102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-23 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.195869480E09 +++$+++ I will do so as soon as possible.  Do you mind telling me where the overdub starts?  I think I know where, but I could be wrong.   +++$+++ I will do so as soon as possible.  Do you mind telling me where the overdub starts?  I think I know where, but I could be wrong.  [[User:Xihix|<span style="border:2px solid orange;padding:2px; color:#fef;background:#4682B4;">'''xihix'''</span>]]<font size="1">([[User_talk:Xihix|talk]])</font> 17:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
288103 +++$+++ Xihix +++$+++ NSR77 +++$+++ 288102 +++$+++ 288102 +++$+++ 2007-11-24 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.195957860E09 +++$+++ Done!  Here are the files:                                 +++$+++ :Done!  Here are the files:                                [[User:Xihix|<span style="border:2px solid orange;padding:2px; color:#fef;background:#4682B4;">'''xihix'''</span>]]<font size="1">([[User_talk:Xihix|talk]])</font> 18:31, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

531156 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-13 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.281688620E09 +++$+++ I am not having a problem with a editor again like last time, but I am having problems. I check NASCAR.com \/ ESPN.com \/ Jayski.com to update the article. When I am not editing it IPs and other editiors with only few edits are adding unofficial items. What should be done (if anything) to stop this. Semi-Protection maybe? Leave as is? I'm not sure. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996| <span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue\">Contributions<\/span>]] \/  +++$+++ I am not having a problem with a editor again like last time, but I am having problems. I check NASCAR.com / ESPN.com / Jayski.com to update the article. When I am not editing it IPs and other editiors with only few edits are adding unofficial items. What should be done (if anything) to stop this. Semi-Protection maybe? Leave as is? I'm not sure. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996| <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Contributions</span>]] / [[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook#Sign Here|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Guestbook</span>]]''</sup> 01:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
531157 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.281690180E09 +++$+++ Have you tried adding a hidden comment about it (<nowiki><!--Like this!--><\/nowiki>)? Show up -> <!--Like this!-->. If that doesn't work, then maybe semi-protection can be considered.  +++$+++ :Have you tried adding a hidden comment about it (<nowiki><!--Like this!--></nowiki>)? Show up -> <!--Like this!-->. If that doesn't work, then maybe semi-protection can be considered. [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 02:03, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
531158 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ 531157 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.281690600E09 +++$+++ I have said only add items from Jayski or ESPN or NASCAR, but no it didn't work. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996| <span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue\">Contributions<\/span>]] \/  +++$+++ ::I have said only add items from Jayski or ESPN or NASCAR, but no it didn't work. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996| <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Contributions</span>]] / [[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook#Sign Here|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Guestbook</span>]]''</sup> 02:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
531159 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ 531158 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.281692280E09 +++$+++ {{done}} I semi-protected the article, but that might not be enough since some of these users are autoconfirmed. Do you think that this is sockpuppetry? [[User:Trocksuk4415]] has already been accused of it and I think that you should bring it up at [[WP:SSP]]. This would be a good thing for you to add to your experience. The disruptive behavior for case is the addition of unsourced speculation plus all of the editing done to the article. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::{{done}} I semi-protected the article, but that might not be enough since some of these users are autoconfirmed. Do you think that this is sockpuppetry? [[User:Trocksuk4415]] has already been accused of it and I think that you should bring it up at [[WP:SSP]]. This would be a good thing for you to add to your experience. The disruptive behavior for case is the addition of unsourced speculation plus all of the editing done to the article. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:38, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
531160 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ 531159 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.281693480E09 +++$+++ Good. I'm not sure about the sockpuppetry. I'll mention one thing though, [[User:82ironman14]] and [[User:ABEnstein]] created their acounts nine minutes between each other. Both have only NASCAR contributions. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996| <span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue\">Contributions<\/span>]] \/  +++$+++ ::::Good. I'm not sure about the sockpuppetry. I'll mention one thing though, [[User:82ironman14]] and [[User:ABEnstein]] created their acounts nine minutes between each other. Both have only NASCAR contributions. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996| <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Contributions</span>]] / [[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook#Sign Here|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Guestbook</span>]]''</sup> 02:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
531161 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ 531160 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.281694980E09 +++$+++ I think you should have it checked. It smells like sockpuppetry to me. Do the edits all follow the same pattern? Besides, there's no harm if you're wrong. The worst thing that would happen is that you'd offend a poor contributor. The case can always be rejected by the sockpuppet clerk if they feel that there isn't enough evidence. I've argued weaker cases than this and found sockpuppetry. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::I think you should have it checked. It smells like sockpuppetry to me. Do the edits all follow the same pattern? Besides, there's no harm if you're wrong. The worst thing that would happen is that you'd offend a poor contributor. The case can always be rejected by the sockpuppet clerk if they feel that there isn't enough evidence. I've argued weaker cases than this and found sockpuppetry. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
531162 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ 531161 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.281695700E09 +++$+++ Okay, so who do you think are the sockpuppeters? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996| <span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue\">Contributions<\/span>]] \/  +++$+++ ::::::Okay, so who do you think are the sockpuppeters? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996| <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Contributions</span>]] / [[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook#Sign Here|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Guestbook</span>]]''</sup> 03:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
531163 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ 531162 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.281696120E09 +++$+++ Huh? You can call any of them sockpuppeteers. I would name Trocksuk4415 has the puppet master - usually the most well-known is listed. Be honest and forward - do you think that there is a pattern or do you think I'm wrong? 2 accounts created 9 minutes apart is also evidence. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::::::Huh? You can call any of them sockpuppeteers. I would name Trocksuk4415 has the puppet master - usually the most well-known is listed. Be honest and forward - do you think that there is a pattern or do you think I'm wrong? 2 accounts created 9 minutes apart is also evidence. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:42, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
531164 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ 531163 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.281696480E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm not sure. I don't know if your right or wrong, but I'll just add all of them. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996| <span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue\">Contributions<\/span>]] \/  +++$+++ ::::::::Well, I'm not sure. I don't know if your right or wrong, but I'll just add all of them. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996| <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Contributions</span>]] / [[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook#Sign Here|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Guestbook</span>]]''</sup> 03:48, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
531165 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ 531164 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.281696660E09 +++$+++ What exactly should I do? With Checkuser or without? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996| <span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue\">Contributions<\/span>]] \/  +++$+++ :::::::::What exactly should I do? With Checkuser or without? --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996| <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Contributions</span>]] / [[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook#Sign Here|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Guestbook</span>]]''</sup> 03:51, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
531166 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ 531165 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.281696780E09 +++$+++ If you're not convinced, then you shouldn't do anything at all. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::::::If you're not convinced, then you shouldn't do anything at all. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
531167 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531156 +++$+++ 531166 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.281697320E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure either way; I try to stay out of these type of situations. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black\">Nascar<\/span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red\">1996<\/span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions\/Nascar1996| <span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue\">Contributions<\/span>]] \/  +++$+++ :::::::::::I'm not sure either way; I try to stay out of these type of situations. --'''[[User:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: black">Nascar</span>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: red">1996</span>]]''' <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/Nascar1996| <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Contributions</span>]] / [[User:Nascar1996/Guestbook#Sign Here|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color: blue">Guestbook</span>]]''</sup> 04:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

6870 +++$+++ GoRight +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6870 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-10 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.218368820E09 +++$+++ If you are not aware of it, you might find this ArbCom ruling, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Hkelkar#Removal_of_sourced_edits_made_in_a_neutral_narrative_is_disruptive Removal of sourced edits made in a neutral narrative is disruptive], useful in the future when coupled with Raul's comment here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle&diff=230814057&oldid=230729113].   Just FYI.  -- +++$+++ If you are not aware of it, you might find this ArbCom ruling, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar#Removal_of_sourced_edits_made_in_a_neutral_narrative_is_disruptive Removal of sourced edits made in a neutral narrative is disruptive], useful in the future when coupled with Raul's comment here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle&diff=230814057&oldid=230729113].   Just FYI.  --[[User:GoRight|GoRight]] ([[User talk:GoRight|talk]]) 04:47, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
6871 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6870 +++$+++ 6870 +++$+++ 2008-08-10 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.218401040E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the link to the Arbcom ruling.  It is interesting.  Surprisingly, I find Raul's comment to be on the mark.  As an analogy, the US Supreme Court is not bound by previous Supreme Court rulings even though they are law for everyone else.  The reason for this is that it gives the Supreme Court the ability to correct its own mistakes.  Indeed, the Supreme Court has ruled against itself on several occasions in history.[http:\/\/www.gpoaccess.gov\/constitution\/pdf2002\/048.pdf]  The problem with Raul is that his POV regarding global warming is so strong it does not allow him to be objective, or even reasonable. So he does not give reasons.  He may type words (such as \"unacceptable\") but they do not explain anything.  +++$+++ :Thank you for the link to the Arbcom ruling.  It is interesting.  Surprisingly, I find Raul's comment to be on the mark.  As an analogy, the US Supreme Court is not bound by previous Supreme Court rulings even though they are law for everyone else.  The reason for this is that it gives the Supreme Court the ability to correct its own mistakes.  Indeed, the Supreme Court has ruled against itself on several occasions in history.[http://www.gpoaccess.gov/constitution/pdf2002/048.pdf]  The problem with Raul is that his POV regarding global warming is so strong it does not allow him to be objective, or even reasonable. So he does not give reasons.  He may type words (such as "unacceptable") but they do not explain anything. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 13:44, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

6873 +++$+++ JamesMLane +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-07 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.220782560E09 +++$+++ On [[Talk:Sarah Palin]] you said that removing a \"that\" wouldn't change the meaning.  Whether or not the meaning changes, there can certainly be, at a minimum, a loss of clarity.  I think the example in Strunk & White is \"He felt that his big nose made him look ridiculous.\"  Remove the \"that\" and the reader will form a false impression at first and will have to work harder to extract the correct meaning.  If I'd been expressing Palin's thought, I would also have used her \"that that\" construction.  I decided, however, that that thought was too tangential for the hyperactive Palin talk page, so I'm unburdening myself here.  :)  +++$+++ On [[Talk:Sarah Palin]] you said that removing a "that" wouldn't change the meaning.  Whether or not the meaning changes, there can certainly be, at a minimum, a loss of clarity.  I think the example in Strunk & White is "He felt that his big nose made him look ridiculous."  Remove the "that" and the reader will form a false impression at first and will have to work harder to extract the correct meaning.  If I'd been expressing Palin's thought, I would also have used her "that that" construction.  I decided, however, that that thought was too tangential for the hyperactive Palin talk page, so I'm unburdening myself here.  :) [[User:JamesMLane|JamesMLane]]<small>&nbsp;[[User_talk:JamesMLane|t]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/JamesMLane|c]]</small> 03:16, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
6874 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6873 +++$+++ 6873 +++$+++ 2008-09-07 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.220791080E09 +++$+++ I love Strunk & White but disagree on that. :)  If the example is read quickly, it is plain as can be. If it is read slowly, the correct interpretation may require more energy - but I still find it preferable.  +++$+++ :I love Strunk & White but disagree on that. :)  If the example is read quickly, it is plain as can be. If it is read slowly, the correct interpretation may require more energy - but I still find it preferable. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 05:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
6875 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6873 +++$+++ 6873 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.224016740E09 +++$+++ Additionally, '''do not make disruptive edits or edit war''' on talk pages page such as these two[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&curid=7777393&diff=245214654&oldid=245214290][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=245216345] re-opening multiple closed discussions and reverting attempts to organize the talk page.  Please do not use the talk page to promote [[WP:FRINGE|fringe]] theories that are already under discussion elsewhere.  If you continue you may be blocked from further editing and\/or banned from participating in election-related articles and discussions.  Thanks,   +++$+++ :Additionally, '''do not make disruptive edits or edit war''' on talk pages page such as these two[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&curid=7777393&diff=245214654&oldid=245214290][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=245216345] re-opening multiple closed discussions and reverting attempts to organize the talk page.  Please do not use the talk page to promote [[WP:FRINGE|fringe]] theories that are already under discussion elsewhere.  If you continue you may be blocked from further editing and/or banned from participating in election-related articles and discussions.  Thanks,  [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 13:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6876 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6873 +++$+++ 6875 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.224016860E09 +++$+++ Wikidemon, your edits are contrary to Wikipedia policy.  The discussion is not closed.  Attempts to close the discussion prematurely look like an effort to prevent consensus.  If you continue, your actions will come under review.  +++$+++ ::Wikidemon, your edits are contrary to Wikipedia policy.  The discussion is not closed.  Attempts to close the discussion prematurely look like an effort to prevent consensus.  If you continue, your actions will come under review. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 13:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6877 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6873 +++$+++ 6876 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.224017160E09 +++$+++ Do not push this one.  Please note that you seem to have reverted discussion closures at least three times on the talk page in the past 24 hours, and that any further reversions may among other things be a violation of [[WP:3RR]].  That is a line that you should not cross, whatever your views are on the subject. +++$+++ :::Do not push this one.  Please note that you seem to have reverted discussion closures at least three times on the talk page in the past 24 hours, and that any further reversions may among other things be a violation of [[WP:3RR]].  That is a line that you should not cross, whatever your views are on the subject.[[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 13:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6878 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6873 +++$+++ 6877 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.224017340E09 +++$+++ I am familiar with the rules.  My concern is that you are not or that you just do not care.  Limiting discussion to prevent consensus is contrary to Wikipedia policy.  There is no reason to limit discussion as the discussion is based on RS.  +++$+++ ::::I am familiar with the rules.  My concern is that you are not or that you just do not care.  Limiting discussion to prevent consensus is contrary to Wikipedia policy.  There is no reason to limit discussion as the discussion is based on RS. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 13:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6879 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6873 +++$+++ 6878 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.224018540E09 +++$+++ Three editors have participated in closing the discussion you wish to re-open.  Please take that as an indication that there is consensus not only that the material is not suitable for the encyclopedia but that the discussion itself is unproductive.  Additionally there is already a full discussion on the matter at [[Talk:Dreams from My Father]], that does not need to be repeated at [[Talk:Barack Obama]].  Administrators reviewing the matter have supported closing contentious discussions of fringe and repeated non-consensus proposals on busy election-related talk pages. +++$+++ :::::Three editors have participated in closing the discussion you wish to re-open.  Please take that as an indication that there is consensus not only that the material is not suitable for the encyclopedia but that the discussion itself is unproductive.  Additionally there is already a full discussion on the matter at [[Talk:Dreams from My Father]], that does not need to be repeated at [[Talk:Barack Obama]].  Administrators reviewing the matter have supported closing contentious discussions of fringe and repeated non-consensus proposals on busy election-related talk pages.[[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 14:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6880 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6873 +++$+++ 6879 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.224018900E09 +++$+++ I cannot take it as consensus because I strongly disagree. It does need to be repeated because the issue relates to both articles.  The fact a number of administrators support closing does not mean their viewpoint is in accord with Wikipedia policy.  It just means their own POV is directing their actions. The viewpoints of administrators is no more valuable than the viewpoint of other editors.  They have to live with Wikipedia rules just like I do.  +++$+++ ::::::I cannot take it as consensus because I strongly disagree. It does need to be repeated because the issue relates to both articles.  The fact a number of administrators support closing does not mean their viewpoint is in accord with Wikipedia policy.  It just means their own POV is directing their actions. The viewpoints of administrators is no more valuable than the viewpoint of other editors.  They have to live with Wikipedia rules just like I do. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 14:15, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6881 +++$+++ GoodDamon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6873 +++$+++ 6880 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.224021900E09 +++$+++ I came here to give you a friendly notice about [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:BLP]], but I couldn't help seeing something that troubles me in the comment above. You said you can't take it as consensus \"because I strongly disagree.\" I'm afraid that with long-term consensus -- which that talk page has achieved on many subjects -- your disagreement is moot. When the weight of policy, repeated administrative review (to the point of ''ad nauseum''), and most of the other editors is against a particular subject, repeated attempts to bring up that subject can be regarded as [[WP:DISRUPT|disruptive editing]]. --<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :::::::I came here to give you a friendly notice about [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:BLP]], but I couldn't help seeing something that troubles me in the comment above. You said you can't take it as consensus "because I strongly disagree." I'm afraid that with long-term consensus -- which that talk page has achieved on many subjects -- your disagreement is moot. When the weight of policy, repeated administrative review (to the point of ''ad nauseum''), and most of the other editors is against a particular subject, repeated attempts to bring up that subject can be regarded as [[WP:DISRUPT|disruptive editing]]. --<font color="green">[[User:GoodDamon|Good]]</font>[[User_talk:GoodDamon|Damon]] 15:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

269018 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-29 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.230554340E09 +++$+++ I have only this to say, which is that I am in complete agreement with Lar, and I really do believe that you. Mattisse, need to reasess your attitude towards this project. I will fully admit that I myself am not perfect, with luck and a fair wind will never be perfect, and I am no role model. But it's a mistake to believe that long-standing and (I firmly believe) good faith editors like SandyG aren't worn down by the kinds of cheap pot shots that have apparently become your trade mark. I have had disagreements with many editors in the past, including SandyG and probably even Lar, but I hope that I have never carried them on into grudge matches, and I hope that I never will. -- +++$+++ I have only this to say, which is that I am in complete agreement with Lar, and I really do believe that you. Mattisse, need to reasess your attitude towards this project. I will fully admit that I myself am not perfect, with luck and a fair wind will never be perfect, and I am no role model. But it's a mistake to believe that long-standing and (I firmly believe) good faith editors like SandyG aren't worn down by the kinds of cheap pot shots that have apparently become your trade mark. I have had disagreements with many editors in the past, including SandyG and probably even Lar, but I hope that I have never carried them on into grudge matches, and I hope that I never will. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 04:39, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
269019 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269018 +++$+++ 269018 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.230554880E09 +++$+++ You have lost all credibility with me and need not post your opinion on my page, except to provide evidence for my \"sprouting out of the woodwork\" theory. (You have sprouted!)  All you do is reinforce my distaste for the nature of your unenviable ways, which is the underbelly of Wikipedia: protect those you must to survive. You have lost me; your ways are not  something to admire. &mdash; +++$+++ :You have lost all credibility with me and need not post your opinion on my page, except to provide evidence for my "sprouting out of the woodwork" theory. (You have sprouted!)  All you do is reinforce my distaste for the nature of your unenviable ways, which is the underbelly of Wikipedia: protect those you must to survive. You have lost me; your ways are not  something to admire. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
269020 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269018 +++$+++ 269019 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.230556980E09 +++$+++ You don't know me, this isn't real life. Time to lighten up a bit? Just a little bit? -- +++$+++ ::You don't know me, this isn't real life. Time to lighten up a bit? Just a little bit? --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 05:23, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

269021 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-29 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.230557220E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, just to leave a note (because I needed to see the current hubbub) - I don't think Lar is part of Sandy's sekret force. He doesn't know the handshake. Or, I could just be on the outs. I do have a mouth that chases people away. Perhaps that is it and thats how I never met Lar at one of the meetings. :) I know I don't have any credibility with you, so you can take this as a silent confirmation of Lar really being a member. :)  +++$+++ Mattisse, just to leave a note (because I needed to see the current hubbub) - I don't think Lar is part of Sandy's sekret force. He doesn't know the handshake. Or, I could just be on the outs. I do have a mouth that chases people away. Perhaps that is it and thats how I never met Lar at one of the meetings. :) I know I don't have any credibility with you, so you can take this as a silent confirmation of Lar really being a member. :) [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 05:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
269022 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269021 +++$+++ 269021 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.230557400E09 +++$+++ They change the handshake at random intervals.  And now they require a \"strong\" handshake, at least ten digits, with at least one wearing a Secret Decoder Ring.-- +++$+++ :They change the handshake at random intervals.  And now they require a "strong" handshake, at least ten digits, with at least one wearing a Secret Decoder Ring.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 05:30, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
269023 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269021 +++$+++ 269022 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.230558240E09 +++$+++ Can you believe this?? All over a stupid, trivial post, having nothing to do with anything relevant that apparently upset the Person. They all have ESP? Where did Lar come from? Why is he posting on my page over an incredibly stupid incident? I know about the \"network\" as this is a very frequent happening on my page. Believe it or not, I am so IMPORTANT that legends of editors watch my page, not only my page but by contributions! Can you believe that? Well, what can I say? That is how important I am. (Unless, of course, there is some kind of \"other\" network employed by the Queen Bee to alert the sabotages of all that is not 100% positive of the Big Wig, like the handshake at random intervals.) Ottava Rima, you one of those? Do you watch my page and my contributions assiduously, or do you have ESP or what? Why are you posting on my page? What is the secret \"alert\" system? Cheers, &mdash; +++$+++ ::Can you believe this?? All over a stupid, trivial post, having nothing to do with anything relevant that apparently upset the Person. They all have ESP? Where did Lar come from? Why is he posting on my page over an incredibly stupid incident? I know about the "network" as this is a very frequent happening on my page. Believe it or not, I am so IMPORTANT that legends of editors watch my page, not only my page but by contributions! Can you believe that? Well, what can I say? That is how important I am. (Unless, of course, there is some kind of "other" network employed by the Queen Bee to alert the sabotages of all that is not 100% positive of the Big Wig, like the handshake at random intervals.) Ottava Rima, you one of those? Do you watch my page and my contributions assiduously, or do you have ESP or what? Why are you posting on my page? What is the secret "alert" system? Cheers, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 05:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
269024 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269021 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.230590940E09 +++$+++ I'm concerned about the ''pattern of behaviour'' not just the particular edit. That edit is one example of many. Again, focus on your own behaviour instead of attacking all and sundry unless they 100% agree with you, and instead of seeking conspiracies and the like. ++ +++$+++ ::::I'm concerned about the ''pattern of behaviour'' not just the particular edit. That edit is one example of many. Again, focus on your own behaviour instead of attacking all and sundry unless they 100% agree with you, and instead of seeking conspiracies and the like. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 14:49, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
269025 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269021 +++$+++ 269023 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.230559560E09 +++$+++ The egocentrism of the above made me giggle. <3 I actually came to post about something else but I got side tracked and decided to be silly. I only have one talk page on my watch list and it is one that always makes me cringe when the orange bar lights up. :)  +++$+++ :::The egocentrism of the above made me giggle. <3 I actually came to post about something else but I got side tracked and decided to be silly. I only have one talk page on my watch list and it is one that always makes me cringe when the orange bar lights up. :) [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 06:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
269026 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269021 +++$+++ 269025 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.230560460E09 +++$+++ Then go away. Surely you are capable of that. Nothing compels you to watch my page. (And you seem deficient in recognizing irony also, perhaps a common quality of the Big Wiggers.) Not a very appealing bunch of secret hand shakers, are you Big Wig supporters. I am lucky in not having to suck up.   &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Then go away. Surely you are capable of that. Nothing compels you to watch my page. (And you seem deficient in recognizing irony also, perhaps a common quality of the Big Wiggers.) Not a very appealing bunch of secret hand shakers, are you Big Wig supporters. I am lucky in not having to suck up.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 06:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
269027 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269021 +++$+++ 269026 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.230597300E09 +++$+++ Why would I go when I just said that I enjoyed it? And when have I ever sucked up to anyone? Haha. I should probably start. It would do me good. I'm just as confused as to why Lar stepped in also. He seems to come appear at the most peculiar moments. At least when the devil would do that, he would offer interesting gifts. :P  +++$+++ :::::Why would I go when I just said that I enjoyed it? And when have I ever sucked up to anyone? Haha. I should probably start. It would do me good. I'm just as confused as to why Lar stepped in also. He seems to come appear at the most peculiar moments. At least when the devil would do that, he would offer interesting gifts. :P [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 16:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

569125 +++$+++ Diez2 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569125 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.163059260E09 +++$+++ Is there a way in which I can just get permission to delete all of the stupid and dumb articles that appear on [[Special:Newpages]]?  +++$+++ Is there a way in which I can just get permission to delete all of the stupid and dumb articles that appear on [[Special:Newpages]]? [[User:Diez2|Diez2]] 00:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
569126 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569125 +++$+++ 569125 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.163059680E09 +++$+++ In order to delete articles, you have to have Administrator privileges on Wikipedia.  You can read about the role of administrators at [[Wikipedia:Administrators]].  If you want to become an admin then I suggest making helpful edits in the Wiki, polocy, article and Userspaces for at least six months in order to build up knowledge of [[Wikipedia:Policy|policies and guidelines]] and a good reputation amongst your peers.  If you want to nominate articles for deletion, take a look at [[WP:CSD|the speedy deletion criteria]] and use the templates to tag the pages for the attention of administrators such as me.  Don't forget that you have been adopted by  +++$+++ :In order to delete articles, you have to have Administrator privileges on Wikipedia.  You can read about the role of administrators at [[Wikipedia:Administrators]].  If you want to become an admin then I suggest making helpful edits in the Wiki, polocy, article and Userspaces for at least six months in order to build up knowledge of [[Wikipedia:Policy|policies and guidelines]] and a good reputation amongst your peers.  If you want to nominate articles for deletion, take a look at [[WP:CSD|the speedy deletion criteria]] and use the templates to tag the pages for the attention of administrators such as me.  Don't forget that you have been adopted by [[User:Rat235478683|Rat235478683]], so you are free to ask them questions about Wikipedia as well! [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 00:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

531168 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-14 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.281814560E09 +++$+++ Would you please take a look at an article about [[James Liddy]]? He is a poet born in Ireland and taught at UW-Milwaukee. The article was copied from the reference word for word-copyright violation. This article came up new articles WP-Wisconsin-many thanks- +++$+++ Would you please take a look at an article about [[James Liddy]]? He is a poet born in Ireland and taught at UW-Milwaukee. The article was copied from the reference word for word-copyright violation. This article came up new articles WP-Wisconsin-many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 12:36, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
531169 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531168 +++$+++ 531168 +++$+++ 2010-08-14 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.281815340E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I deleted it. I had not noticed even though I saw the article! Next time you really should get it deleted immediately by following the directions at  [[WP:CSD]] (Criteria for Speedy Deletion). I happened to be online when you asked. I see that someone new from northern Wisconsin ([[User:Jeff the quiet]]) photographed all of the National Register of Historic Places listings in Langlade County. I was adding categories to the images at Commons. He would be a good candidate for WP:WISCONSIN if you'd like to contact him. I already welcomed Jeff. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thank you, I deleted it. I had not noticed even though I saw the article! Next time you really should get it deleted immediately by following the directions at  [[WP:CSD]] (Criteria for Speedy Deletion). I happened to be online when you asked. I see that someone new from northern Wisconsin ([[User:Jeff the quiet]]) photographed all of the National Register of Historic Places listings in Langlade County. I was adding categories to the images at Commons. He would be a good candidate for WP:WISCONSIN if you'd like to contact him. I already welcomed Jeff. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:49, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
531170 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531168 +++$+++ 531169 +++$+++ 2010-08-14 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.281816780E09 +++$+++ I welcome Jeff the unquiet. also 1014cd=unincorporated communities in Outagamie County. I hope both will join us at WP=Wisconsin. Many thanks- +++$+++ ::I welcome Jeff the unquiet. also 1014cd=unincorporated communities in Outagamie County. I hope both will join us at WP=Wisconsin. Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 13:13, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
531171 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531168 +++$+++ 531170 +++$+++ 2010-08-14 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.281816900E09 +++$+++ Good job, thanks! 1014cd has been coming up on my watchlist a lot lately with a bunch of work on communities in Outagamie County. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Good job, thanks! 1014cd has been coming up on my watchlist a lot lately with a bunch of work on communities in Outagamie County. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:15, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

6882 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6882 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-14 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.224023220E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid my disagreement is not moot.  Consensus indicates a state in which basic agreement exists.  No basic agreement exists on this issue.  False statements that the link I provided is not [[WP:RS]] and violates [[WP:BLP]] is simply wrong. Attempts to end discussion shows POV rather than dealing with facts.  +++$+++ I'm afraid my disagreement is not moot.  Consensus indicates a state in which basic agreement exists.  No basic agreement exists on this issue.  False statements that the link I provided is not [[WP:RS]] and violates [[WP:BLP]] is simply wrong. Attempts to end discussion shows POV rather than dealing with facts. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 15:27, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6883 +++$+++ GoodDamon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6882 +++$+++ 6882 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.224030300E09 +++$+++ Your sources were not reliable for statements of fact, without question, as they were blatantly opinion pieces. As such, they would be more applicable to the campaign articles, but not to a [[WP:BLP]] article. --<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :Your sources were not reliable for statements of fact, without question, as they were blatantly opinion pieces. As such, they would be more applicable to the campaign articles, but not to a [[WP:BLP]] article. --<font color="green">[[User:GoodDamon|Good]]</font>[[User_talk:GoodDamon|Damon]] 17:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6884 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6882 +++$+++ 6883 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.224031320E09 +++$+++ This must be a recent change to the guideline and is obviously wrongheaded. The original wording was better.  You can source an op-ed piece for its factual background because editorial oversight fact checks the factual background statement.  You may not cite the actual opinions expressed based on those facts. The guideline needs to be changed back to its original reading. This was probably changed because some people feel if the fact is well-established to use in an op-ed piece, then you can probably find a better source.  I disagree with that.  Jack Anderson used to write a column that included investigative reporting.  Bill Gertz's column is similar. These columns should not be excluded because news is often broken here.  But more importantly, facts can become commonly known from the broadcast media and used in op-ed pieces yet never be written up in a hard copy publication.  +++$+++ ::This must be a recent change to the guideline and is obviously wrongheaded. The original wording was better.  You can source an op-ed piece for its factual background because editorial oversight fact checks the factual background statement.  You may not cite the actual opinions expressed based on those facts. The guideline needs to be changed back to its original reading. This was probably changed because some people feel if the fact is well-established to use in an op-ed piece, then you can probably find a better source.  I disagree with that.  Jack Anderson used to write a column that included investigative reporting.  Bill Gertz's column is similar. These columns should not be excluded because news is often broken here.  But more importantly, facts can become commonly known from the broadcast media and used in op-ed pieces yet never be written up in a hard copy publication. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 17:42, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6885 +++$+++ GoodDamon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6882 +++$+++ 6884 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.224032400E09 +++$+++ I strongly agree with the current wording. If an opinion piece '''does''' break news, then that news will shortly arrive in a non-opinion news story, stated as fact. Remember, there's no [[WP:DEADLINE|deadline]] for content arriving in Wikipedia. In any event, the current wording stands, although you're free to take it up on the [[WP:RS]] talk page. --<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :::I strongly agree with the current wording. If an opinion piece '''does''' break news, then that news will shortly arrive in a non-opinion news story, stated as fact. Remember, there's no [[WP:DEADLINE|deadline]] for content arriving in Wikipedia. In any event, the current wording stands, although you're free to take it up on the [[WP:RS]] talk page. --<font color="green">[[User:GoodDamon|Good]]</font>[[User_talk:GoodDamon|Damon]] 18:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

531172 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531172 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-19 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.282268280E09 +++$+++ Hi! I you are well. I redirected the old town of [[Bristol, Kenosha County, Wisconsin]] to the [[Bristol, Wisconsin]] article the village of Bristol voted to annex the remaining town. Okay one of the editors revert this saying it had to be kept for historical purposes. We redirected the old town of Rochester into the [[Rochester, Wisconsin]] article when the village voted to annex the old town and there was no problems.Help-please-thank you- +++$+++ Hi! I you are well. I redirected the old town of [[Bristol, Kenosha County, Wisconsin]] to the [[Bristol, Wisconsin]] article the village of Bristol voted to annex the remaining town. Okay one of the editors revert this saying it had to be kept for historical purposes. We redirected the old town of Rochester into the [[Rochester, Wisconsin]] article when the village voted to annex the old town and there was no problems.Help-please-thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 18:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
531173 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531172 +++$+++ 531172 +++$+++ 2010-08-19 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.282280700E09 +++$+++ PS the unincorporated community of Cavour, Wisconsin was redirected to the town of Caswell in Forest County. This needs to be reverse also. Cavour has a zipcode 54511 and the article needs to be done for Cavour. Many thanks- +++$+++ :PS the unincorporated community of Cavour, Wisconsin was redirected to the town of Caswell in Forest County. This needs to be reverse also. Cavour has a zipcode 54511 and the article needs to be done for Cavour. Many thanks-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 22:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
531174 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531172 +++$+++ 531173 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.282331700E09 +++$+++ I'm too busy right now to work on either. I have been accumulating a lot of pictures to upload, and you'll be seeing a lot come from me over the next few months into the winter once the racing season is over. I'm leaving on next Wednesday on a vacation into Upper Michigan for 4 days - so I'll be getting even more pictures. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I'm too busy right now to work on either. I have been accumulating a lot of pictures to upload, and you'll be seeing a lot come from me over the next few months into the winter once the racing season is over. I'm leaving on next Wednesday on a vacation into Upper Michigan for 4 days - so I'll be getting even more pictures. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:15, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

269029 +++$+++ Plutonium27 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269029 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-29 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.230610620E09 +++$+++ '''Did You Know''' I was trying to fix up the numbering bollocks occasioned by my # omission when I noticed you'd replied and sorted it at [[WP:Requests for adminship\/Suntag]] ?!  Ta :) All the best  +++$+++ '''Did You Know''' I was trying to fix up the numbering bollocks occasioned by my # omission when I noticed you'd replied and sorted it at [[WP:Requests for adminship/Suntag]] ?!  Ta :) All the best [[User:Plutonium27|Plutonium27]] ([[User talk:Plutonium27|talk]]) 20:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
269030 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269029 +++$+++ 269029 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.230611040E09 +++$+++ Yes, apparently the '''#''' is added with ''':''' after it; that is the key to correct display. Periodically I forget and have to learn it again! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes, apparently the '''#''' is added with ''':''' after it; that is the key to correct display. Periodically I forget and have to learn it again! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

6886 +++$+++ Jaysweet +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-14 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.224040680E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] Your recent edits {{#if:Talk:Barack Obama|to [[:Talk:Barack Obama]]}} could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other \"off-wiki\" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is '''''strictly prohibited''''' under Wikipedia's policies on [[Wikipedia:No legal threats|legal threats]] and [[Wikipedia:Civility|civility]]. Users who make such threats may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-legal --> ''Diff: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=245290748&oldid=245290032]''  +++$+++ [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] Your recent edits {{#if:Talk:Barack Obama|to [[:Talk:Barack Obama]]}} could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is '''''strictly prohibited''''' under Wikipedia's policies on [[Wikipedia:No legal threats|legal threats]] and [[Wikipedia:Civility|civility]]. Users who make such threats may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-legal --> ''Diff: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=245290748&oldid=245290032]'' [[User:Jaysweet|Jaysweet]] ([[User talk:Jaysweet|talk]]) 20:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6887 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.224041220E09 +++$+++ I plan no legal action but it would not surprise me if Joe Farah took action.  He deserves to know if his publication is being defamed.  +++$+++ :I plan no legal action but it would not surprise me if Joe Farah took action.  He deserves to know if his publication is being defamed. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 20:27, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6888 +++$+++ Jaysweet +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6887 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.224041760E09 +++$+++ Who the hell would he even sue?!? -- +++$+++ ::Who the hell would he even sue?!? --[[User:Jaysweet|Jaysweet]] ([[User talk:Jaysweet|talk]]) 20:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6889 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6888 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.224042060E09 +++$+++ If he chose, he could sue Wikipedia as an entity.  He could also sue personally the directors of the entity and those who were responsible for a decision to say his publication is not reliable. I do not know Joe well, but I do know that he founded WorldNetDaily and he would take any attack on its credibility very personally.  +++$+++ :::If he chose, he could sue Wikipedia as an entity.  He could also sue personally the directors of the entity and those who were responsible for a decision to say his publication is not reliable. I do not know Joe well, but I do know that he founded WorldNetDaily and he would take any attack on its credibility very personally. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 20:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6890 +++$+++ Loonymonkey +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6889 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.224048480E09 +++$+++ You seem to have a severe misunderstanding of both Wikipedia policies and U.S. civil law.  No, Worldnetdaily is not a reliable source as Wikipedia defines it and no, saying so is not grounds for a lawsuit.  -- +++$+++ ::::You seem to have a severe misunderstanding of both Wikipedia policies and U.S. civil law.  No, Worldnetdaily is not a reliable source as Wikipedia defines it and no, saying so is not grounds for a lawsuit.  --[[User:Loonymonkey|Loonymonkey]] ([[User talk:Loonymonkey|talk]]) 22:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6891 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6890 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.224049320E09 +++$+++ Loonymonkey, wrong again. [[WP:RS]] is a guideline describing the principles involved: \"Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. How reliable a source is depends on context. As a rule of thumb, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication.\"  The \"reliable publication process\" refers to editorial oversight.  Blogs, typically, do not have this. Professional journalistic organizations like WorldNetDaily do.  WorldNetDaily has a number of editors, reporters and even has a White House correspondent.  You may not like its conservative bent, but that does not make their stories untrue or unreliable. Calling a professional media outlet \"unreliable\" borders on defamation.  If that is Wikipedia's formal position and not just the opinion of some editors, Wikipedia could well find itself on the receiving end of a lawsuit.  I am still eager to find out if this position is formally Wikipedia's position or just the misguided statement of a wrongheaded editor.  +++$+++ :::::Loonymonkey, wrong again. [[WP:RS]] is a guideline describing the principles involved: "Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. How reliable a source is depends on context. As a rule of thumb, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication."  The "reliable publication process" refers to editorial oversight.  Blogs, typically, do not have this. Professional journalistic organizations like WorldNetDaily do.  WorldNetDaily has a number of editors, reporters and even has a White House correspondent.  You may not like its conservative bent, but that does not make their stories untrue or unreliable. Calling a professional media outlet "unreliable" borders on defamation.  If that is Wikipedia's formal position and not just the opinion of some editors, Wikipedia could well find itself on the receiving end of a lawsuit.  I am still eager to find out if this position is formally Wikipedia's position or just the misguided statement of a wrongheaded editor. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 22:42, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6892 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6891 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.224050220E09 +++$+++ Ron, you live in a weird world. It is ok to claim that [[Hustler Magazine v. Falwell|Jerry Falwell had sex with his mother in an outhouse]] in the US, and it is ok to have and state an opinion on a news outlet. The US, for all its failings (and some are dramatic at the moment) has one of the best legal free speech protections on the planet. Of course it also has a problematic legal system so you can  \"well find yourself on the receiving end of a lawsuit\" for anything or even for nothing at all, but that is essentially a tautology. -- +++$+++ ::::::Ron, you live in a weird world. It is ok to claim that [[Hustler Magazine v. Falwell|Jerry Falwell had sex with his mother in an outhouse]] in the US, and it is ok to have and state an opinion on a news outlet. The US, for all its failings (and some are dramatic at the moment) has one of the best legal free speech protections on the planet. Of course it also has a problematic legal system so you can  "well find yourself on the receiving end of a lawsuit" for anything or even for nothing at all, but that is essentially a tautology. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 22:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6893 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6892 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.224050640E09 +++$+++ Stephan, I live in a beautiful part of the world.  I do want you to stop by for coffee if you ever get to southern Calif.  You are correct that many lawsuits are filed without merit.  However, I also have some background in law.  When guidelines are set up and one person or organization is defamed and treated differently than others for political reasons, the court will have an interest in hearing that case. It will not be difficult for WorldNetDaily to show harm from such a defamation.  +++$+++ :::::::Stephan, I live in a beautiful part of the world.  I do want you to stop by for coffee if you ever get to southern Calif.  You are correct that many lawsuits are filed without merit.  However, I also have some background in law.  When guidelines are set up and one person or organization is defamed and treated differently than others for political reasons, the court will have an interest in hearing that case. It will not be difficult for WorldNetDaily to show harm from such a defamation. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 23:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6894 +++$+++ Loonymonkey +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6890 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.224051000E09 +++$+++ No, Worldnetdaily is not a reliable source for anything other than the (often nutty) opinions of its writers.  This is true throughout all of Wikipedia, not just on the article in question (the issue was settled by consensus some time ago).  Repeating \"yes it is\" doesn't change that.  You can pretend that it's a real and credible journalism outlet but in fact, it's not.   -- +++$+++ :::::No, Worldnetdaily is not a reliable source for anything other than the (often nutty) opinions of its writers.  This is true throughout all of Wikipedia, not just on the article in question (the issue was settled by consensus some time ago).  Repeating "yes it is" doesn't change that.  You can pretend that it's a real and credible journalism outlet but in fact, it's not.   --[[User:Loonymonkey|Loonymonkey]] ([[User talk:Loonymonkey|talk]]) 23:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6895 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6894 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.224051360E09 +++$+++ There is no legal liability to Wikipedia or its contributors for calling some authors, works, and publications \"reliable sources\" and others not.  If you take issue with that you should probably deal with the Wikimedia Foundation directly, because the existence and application of WP:RS are not up for debate on individual article talk pages.  However, the First Amendment right to comment on the reliability of sources is rather fundamental, and not in any serious question.  The whole matter is rather preposterous, as is the claim that we can cite controversial factual claims to partisan blogs and editorials. +++$+++ ::::::There is no legal liability to Wikipedia or its contributors for calling some authors, works, and publications "reliable sources" and others not.  If you take issue with that you should probably deal with the Wikimedia Foundation directly, because the existence and application of WP:RS are not up for debate on individual article talk pages.  However, the First Amendment right to comment on the reliability of sources is rather fundamental, and not in any serious question.  The whole matter is rather preposterous, as is the claim that we can cite controversial factual claims to partisan blogs and editorials.[[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 23:16, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6896 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6895 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.224071160E09 +++$+++ Wikidemon, you are no attorney.  I am not threatening legal action myself so there is no reason for me to take this up with the Wikipedia Foundation.  I am merely pointing out that the claim WorldNetDaily does not meet Wikipedia's standards for a Reliable Source is ridiculous and probably actionable because of harm to the reputation of the media outlet.  You must understand the difference between people talking about how MSNBC is biased or FOX News is biased is different from the claim that WorldNetDaily is not reliable enough to be quoted on Wikipedia. It is the same thing as saying \"Don't do business with Joe Blow because he'll cheat you.\"  That is defamation of character.  There is no problem with Wikipedia saying blogs are not considered reliable because they have no editorial oversight.  There is even no problem ruling out tabloids because so many of them have been sued and lost in court.  But WND has editorial oversight, has never lost a lawsuit (and I don't think has ever been sued) and has a White House correspondent.  WND meets all of the requirements of Wikipedia's standards for a RS.  Just because a bunch of like-minded editors decide they do not like WND does not give Wikipedia the right to publicly claim WND is unreliable. Such a state of affairs invites a lawsuit. Surely you can understand that. +++$+++ :::::::Wikidemon, you are no attorney.  I am not threatening legal action myself so there is no reason for me to take this up with the Wikipedia Foundation.  I am merely pointing out that the claim WorldNetDaily does not meet Wikipedia's standards for a Reliable Source is ridiculous and probably actionable because of harm to the reputation of the media outlet.  You must understand the difference between people talking about how MSNBC is biased or FOX News is biased is different from the claim that WorldNetDaily is not reliable enough to be quoted on Wikipedia. It is the same thing as saying "Don't do business with Joe Blow because he'll cheat you."  That is defamation of character.  There is no problem with Wikipedia saying blogs are not considered reliable because they have no editorial oversight.  There is even no problem ruling out tabloids because so many of them have been sued and lost in court.  But WND has editorial oversight, has never lost a lawsuit (and I don't think has ever been sued) and has a White House correspondent.  WND meets all of the requirements of Wikipedia's standards for a RS.  Just because a bunch of like-minded editors decide they do not like WND does not give Wikipedia the right to publicly claim WND is unreliable. Such a state of affairs invites a lawsuit. Surely you can understand that.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 04:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
6897 +++$+++ Jaysweet +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6896 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.224114000E09 +++$+++ In the meantime, if you use the word \"lawsuit\" one more time on Wikipedia, I'm going to report you to [[WP:ANI]] for violating the spirit of [[WP:LEGAL]].  I don't buy your \"I didn't say I'd sue, I said that other guy would sue!\" defense for a minute.  You are still trying to use the (non-credible) threat of legal action as leverage to get your way on the project, and it is not permitted. -- +++$+++ ::::::::In the meantime, if you use the word "lawsuit" one more time on Wikipedia, I'm going to report you to [[WP:ANI]] for violating the spirit of [[WP:LEGAL]].  I don't buy your "I didn't say I'd sue, I said that other guy would sue!" defense for a minute.  You are still trying to use the (non-credible) threat of legal action as leverage to get your way on the project, and it is not permitted. --[[User:Jaysweet|Jaysweet]] ([[User talk:Jaysweet|talk]]) 16:40, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
6898 +++$+++ Cuddlyable3 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6897 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.224121080E09 +++$+++ RonCram the Wikipedia criteria for Reliable Sources are necessary but not sufficient i.e. there is no source anywhere in the observable universe that has a pre-emptive right to be cited in a Wikipedia article. Your claim that editors choosing not to cite a particular source amounts to actionable defamation of that source is without merit. In fact, I don't do business with Joe Blow, furthermore I don't believe there is any reason why I should, but that is for me to decide and NOT you or Mr. Blow. (RonCram please do advise Mr. Blow on his legal remedies against this my wilful defamation of his enterprise).  +++$+++ :::::::::RonCram the Wikipedia criteria for Reliable Sources are necessary but not sufficient i.e. there is no source anywhere in the observable universe that has a pre-emptive right to be cited in a Wikipedia article. Your claim that editors choosing not to cite a particular source amounts to actionable defamation of that source is without merit. In fact, I don't do business with Joe Blow, furthermore I don't believe there is any reason why I should, but that is for me to decide and NOT you or Mr. Blow. (RonCram please do advise Mr. Blow on his legal remedies against this my wilful defamation of his enterprise). [[User:Cuddlyable3|Cuddlyable3]] ([[User talk:Cuddlyable3|talk]]) 18:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
6899 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.224042240E09 +++$+++ '''Please stop''' creating - and continuing - identical conspiratorial Obama-related discussions in multiple locations, as you did again here.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Chicago_Annenberg_Challenge&diff=prev&oldid=245284616][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=245284933][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=245295529]  You have been cautioned that these articles are under article probation.  This can be seen as disruptive to the articles, and if you persist you may be blocked or banned from these discussions.  Thanks,   +++$+++ :'''Please stop''' creating - and continuing - identical conspiratorial Obama-related discussions in multiple locations, as you did again here.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chicago_Annenberg_Challenge&diff=prev&oldid=245284616][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=245284933][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=245295529]  You have been cautioned that these articles are under article probation.  This can be seen as disruptive to the articles, and if you persist you may be blocked or banned from these discussions.  Thanks,  [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 20:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6900 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6899 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.224042480E09 +++$+++ Wikidemon, the information I provided is relevant to several different articles.  I have provided RS for each of the stories.  Several of my additions are being added to the articles, so I am making a contribution.  +++$+++ ::Wikidemon, the information I provided is relevant to several different articles.  I have provided RS for each of the stories.  Several of my additions are being added to the articles, so I am making a contribution. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 20:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
6901 +++$+++ GoodDamon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6886 +++$+++ 6900 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.224053220E09 +++$+++ RonCram, you are trying everyone's patience. I have pointed out the specific language in [[WP:RS]] that disqualifies the vast majority of your sources, and yet you keep adding them, over and over again. You disagree with the current language at [[WP:RS]]? Fine. ''Take it up at [[Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources|the talk page]]'''. Resolve that issue first. Until then, you are being disruptive. Please stop it now. --<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :::RonCram, you are trying everyone's patience. I have pointed out the specific language in [[WP:RS]] that disqualifies the vast majority of your sources, and yet you keep adding them, over and over again. You disagree with the current language at [[WP:RS]]? Fine. ''Take it up at [[Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources|the talk page]]'''. Resolve that issue first. Until then, you are being disruptive. Please stop it now. --<font color="green">[[User:GoodDamon|Good]]</font>[[User_talk:GoodDamon|Damon]] 23:47, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

269031 +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-30 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.230640260E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, have you considered also compiling stats on how many of those articles Suntag has actually created or expanded himself?  Glancing through, a lot of them appear to be just things he's nominated that others have written.   +++$+++ Mattisse, have you considered also compiling stats on how many of those articles Suntag has actually created or expanded himself?  Glancing through, a lot of them appear to be just things he's nominated that others have written.  [[User:Either way|either way]] ([[User talk:Either way#top|talk]]) 04:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
269032 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269031 +++$+++ 269031 +++$+++ 2008-12-30 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.230640740E09 +++$+++ Hey, it took me hours just to compile what I did. If you look at the articles they are mostly trivial. In fact, one was a spin off, in the form of a list,  of one I wrote myself! The question is, would he have done any of that if he had not received the trinkets and medals! The article of mine that he received a DYK for was a part of an FAC that we had to ditch. I doubt that the fact it received a DYK was of any benefit to it. In fact, I wonder if the hook was even accurate. &mdash; +++$+++ :Hey, it took me hours just to compile what I did. If you look at the articles they are mostly trivial. In fact, one was a spin off, in the form of a list,  of one I wrote myself! The question is, would he have done any of that if he had not received the trinkets and medals! The article of mine that he received a DYK for was a part of an FAC that we had to ditch. I doubt that the fact it received a DYK was of any benefit to it. In fact, I wonder if the hook was even accurate. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
269033 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269031 +++$+++ 269032 +++$+++ 2008-12-30 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.230641040E09 +++$+++ I looked at it. Nothing has been added to it as a result of being a DYK. So much for editors flooding to an article to improve it. Very boring hook, that would be meaningless to anyone not already knowing the subject matter. I think DYK is a crock and I am completely disillusioned. &mdash; +++$+++ ::I looked at it. Nothing has been added to it as a result of being a DYK. So much for editors flooding to an article to improve it. Very boring hook, that would be meaningless to anyone not already knowing the subject matter. I think DYK is a crock and I am completely disillusioned. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:44, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

531176 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531176 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-22 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.282518240E09 +++$+++ Hello RoyalBroil, I'm conducting yet another NASCAR GA review [[Talk:2010 Carfax 400\/GA1|here]] :). Nascar1996 is quick to pick up on past suggestions (which is good), so I'm finding it increasingly hard to provide helpful tips for article improvement. May you please take a look if you have a minute? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hello RoyalBroil, I'm conducting yet another NASCAR GA review [[Talk:2010 Carfax 400/GA1|here]] :). Nascar1996 is quick to pick up on past suggestions (which is good), so I'm finding it increasingly hard to provide helpful tips for article improvement. May you please take a look if you have a minute? Thanks, [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 16:04, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
531177 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531176 +++$+++ 531176 +++$+++ 2010-08-23 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.282554120E09 +++$+++ Thanks!!! I'll be sure to take a look at [[Alan Kulwicki]] tomorrow. I don't have much FA experience, but I'll help where I can :).  +++$+++ :Thanks!!! I'll be sure to take a look at [[Alan Kulwicki]] tomorrow. I don't have much FA experience, but I'll help where I can :). [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 02:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
531178 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531176 +++$+++ 531177 +++$+++ 2010-08-23 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.282554960E09 +++$+++ You probably caught that I reviewed the wrong article! I don't know if I'll have any more time this week to review the right article. I haven't checked my watchlist in many days and I need to do that first. I'm on vacation starting on Wednesday morning. If you do review Kulwicki - please throw the book at it - especially if it's a dictionary. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::You probably caught that I reviewed the wrong article! I don't know if I'll have any more time this week to review the right article. I haven't checked my watchlist in many days and I need to do that first. I'm on vacation starting on Wednesday morning. If you do review Kulwicki - please throw the book at it - especially if it's a dictionary. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 02:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
531179 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531176 +++$+++ 531178 +++$+++ 2010-08-23 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.282557420E09 +++$+++ No problem; I will try to implement your suggestions to [[2010 Toyota\/Save Mart 350]] :).  +++$+++ :::No problem; I will try to implement your suggestions to [[2010 Toyota/Save Mart 350]] :). [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 02:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

269034 +++$+++ Lazulilasher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-31 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.230771240E09 +++$+++ I recall that about 5 months ago, you performed an ''excellent'' GA review of [[Marquis de Lafayette]] (seriously, I'd meant to thank you for it; but, too much time went by). Well, I and others are still working on that article. We have some NPOV problems dealing with the French Revolution (much harder to write than I had thought!), and we have added lots of text that probably needs polished. Regardless, I thought I would extend an invitation to you; we've got a lot of extra work, from your excellent GA review I think you could help; and it'll give you an excuse to leave the \"back-room\" for a bit. What do you think?  +++$+++ I recall that about 5 months ago, you performed an ''excellent'' GA review of [[Marquis de Lafayette]] (seriously, I'd meant to thank you for it; but, too much time went by). Well, I and others are still working on that article. We have some NPOV problems dealing with the French Revolution (much harder to write than I had thought!), and we have added lots of text that probably needs polished. Regardless, I thought I would extend an invitation to you; we've got a lot of extra work, from your excellent GA review I think you could help; and it'll give you an excuse to leave the "back-room" for a bit. What do you think? [[User:Lazulilasher|Lazulilasher]] ([[User talk:Lazulilasher|talk]]) 16:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
269035 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269034 +++$+++ 269034 +++$+++ 2008-12-31 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.230784860E09 +++$+++ I can take a look at the article. Thanks for asking. I can polish text but issues of POV\/NPOV may be beyond me. You are right that where I have been hanging out is bad for the soul! And I feel \"miserable\"!  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I can take a look at the article. Thanks for asking. I can polish text but issues of POV/NPOV may be beyond me. You are right that where I have been hanging out is bad for the soul! And I feel "miserable"!  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
269036 +++$+++ Lazulilasher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269034 +++$+++ 269034 +++$+++ 2009-01-01 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.230854640E09 +++$+++ That's great! Take your time; I've slowly been able to gather some momentum back, so it should be fun. I've been in your spot, where I've felt disillusioned. What helped was when I remembered that there are tons of editors who truly contribute for the sake of it. They merely want to build a better encyclopedia. The rest are merely a small subset; a vocal subset, but a small subset. I realized that the best thing for me was to just do what I like to do. Not sure if it'll help, but it worked for me.  +++$+++ :That's great! Take your time; I've slowly been able to gather some momentum back, so it should be fun. I've been in your spot, where I've felt disillusioned. What helped was when I remembered that there are tons of editors who truly contribute for the sake of it. They merely want to build a better encyclopedia. The rest are merely a small subset; a vocal subset, but a small subset. I realized that the best thing for me was to just do what I like to do. Not sure if it'll help, but it worked for me. [[User:Lazulilasher|Lazulilasher]] ([[User talk:Lazulilasher|talk]]) 16:04, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

569127 +++$+++ Bubba hotep +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.163118900E09 +++$+++ Re: User: Aughhheadshot, what a strange one that was. I'm going to keep the comments he left on my talk page as a keepsake. If I was to imagine some kind of \"comic strip\" vandal - that would be it!  +++$+++ Re: User: Aughhheadshot, what a strange one that was. I'm going to keep the comments he left on my talk page as a keepsake. If I was to imagine some kind of "comic strip" vandal - that would be it! [[User:Bubba hotep|Bubba]] [[User talk:Bubba hotep|hot]][[Special:Contributions/Bubba hotep|ep]] 16:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
569128 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569127 +++$+++ 569127 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.163213340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Yukiudaigx|Yukiudaigx]] now added to [[:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Bobabobabo]]. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 18:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

531180 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-23 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.282618200E09 +++$+++ For Kulwicki's article, do you want to open a peer review or just use the talk page? My first comment: why are there refs in the lead? Ideally, it should summarize the rest of the article; therefore, the info presented in the lead will be repeated later on.  +++$+++ For Kulwicki's article, do you want to open a peer review or just use the talk page? My first comment: why are there refs in the lead? Ideally, it should summarize the rest of the article; therefore, the info presented in the lead will be repeated later on. [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 19:50, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
531181 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531180 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-24 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.282639020E09 +++$+++ You can comment on\/review AK's article's on the talk page. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::You can comment on/review AK's article's on the talk page. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

269038 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-01 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.230858660E09 +++$+++ Concerning your edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Footnotes&diff=261223123&oldid=261219086 here], please refrain from altering the comments of other editors. When I said that I helped Sano reach GA, I really meant it. Now [[WP:Assume good faith|assume good faith]] from here one.  +++$+++ Concerning your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Footnotes&diff=261223123&oldid=261219086 here], please refrain from altering the comments of other editors. When I said that I helped Sano reach GA, I really meant it. Now [[WP:Assume good faith|assume good faith]] from here one. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 17:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
269039 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269038 +++$+++ 269038 +++$+++ 2009-01-01 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.230859620E09 +++$+++ Sorry! Since I was the one who help [[Sagara Sanosuke]] reach Ga, (see number of edits in history [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sagara_Sanosuke&action=history}] and it was late at night, I wrongly altered it. I apologize.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Sorry! Since I was the one who help [[Sagara Sanosuke]] reach Ga, (see number of edits in history [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sagara_Sanosuke&action=history}] and it was late at night, I wrongly altered it. I apologize.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

263293 +++$+++ Husnock +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-14 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.139979960E09 +++$+++ I'm going to ask nicely that you lay off the Star Trek rank images.  By slapping unfree image notices on them, it almost sounds like you are saying people are not being truthful about where they came from.  The sources of the Star Trek rank images was brought up, beaten to death, re-hashed, discussed, discussed again, etc at [[Talk:Starfleet ranks and insignia]].  If you have problems with these images, discuss it there instead of simply labeling them as possible unfree images.  This is a major project which took hours of work by several users. - +++$+++ I'm going to ask nicely that you lay off the Star Trek rank images.  By slapping unfree image notices on them, it almost sounds like you are saying people are not being truthful about where they came from.  The sources of the Star Trek rank images was brought up, beaten to death, re-hashed, discussed, discussed again, etc at [[Talk:Starfleet ranks and insignia]].  If you have problems with these images, discuss it there instead of simply labeling them as possible unfree images.  This is a major project which took hours of work by several users. -[[User:Husnock|Husnock]] 21:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
263294 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263293 +++$+++ 263293 +++$+++ 2006-02-14 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.139980680E09 +++$+++ I resent accusations that I am making accusations! There must be verifiable sources for images. This is policy. You, me and even [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo]] has to to abide be it.  +++$+++ :I resent accusations that I am making accusations! There must be verifiable sources for images. This is policy. You, me and even [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo]] has to to abide be it. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 21:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
263295 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263293 +++$+++ 263294 +++$+++ 2006-02-14 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.139980860E09 +++$+++ I will also give you the opportunity to read everything I've just spent 10 minutes writing, and then I would like you to rvt your own rvt. Faiure to do so is a clear breach of policy. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::I will also give you the opportunity to read everything I've just spent 10 minutes writing, and then I would like you to rvt your own rvt. Faiure to do so is a clear breach of policy. Thanks. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 21:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

269041 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-04 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.231057740E09 +++$+++ Yeah, thanks for the copyedit and the support. It was a nice surprise to get on and see it pass. Well that is 1 done and 11 to go.-- +++$+++ Yeah, thanks for the copyedit and the support. It was a nice surprise to get on and see it pass. Well that is 1 done and 11 to go.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 00:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269042 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.231058220E09 +++$+++ It's a big achievement for that kind of article. Huge! Are they all going to be TNA wrestling articles?  &mdash; +++$+++ :It's a big achievement for that kind of article. Huge! Are they all going to be TNA wrestling articles?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269043 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 269042 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.231060920E09 +++$+++ Here is my plan: [[User:Wrestlinglover\/List of current Total Nonstop Action Wrestling employees|1]].-- +++$+++ ::Here is my plan: [[User:Wrestlinglover/List of current Total Nonstop Action Wrestling employees|1]].--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 01:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269044 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 269043 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.231061340E09 +++$+++ Hopefully you gained some experience, and HOPEFULLY you will figure out a way to eliminate some of the detail (since that seemed to be the major complaint). I will help to the degree that I can.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Hopefully you gained some experience, and HOPEFULLY you will figure out a way to eliminate some of the detail (since that seemed to be the major complaint). I will help to the degree that I can.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269045 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 269042 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.231062600E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, I can do it. Lockdown has been months in the making and is no where near as good as I can write. I just got tired of it and didn't want to change anything that was already good. Future FAs will be very different. [[User:Wrestlinglover\/List of current Total Nonstop Action Wrestling employees|What do you think?]]-- +++$+++ ::Don't worry, I can do it. Lockdown has been months in the making and is no where near as good as I can write. I just got tired of it and didn't want to change anything that was already good. Future FAs will be very different. [[User:Wrestlinglover/List of current Total Nonstop Action Wrestling employees|What do you think?]]--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 01:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269046 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 269045 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.231063140E09 +++$+++ It's good to have goals, as long as it doesn't drag you down. You did a great job. The strength of you reference citations really made them take you seriously. I can help as I did before, but you know that I am not knowledgeable about the subject matter, although I have copy edited other wrestling articles, like  for [[User:GaryColemanFan]]. (He is good at explaining plots and back stories.) Happy 2009 - lets make it a good year! &mdash; +++$+++ :::It's good to have goals, as long as it doesn't drag you down. You did a great job. The strength of you reference citations really made them take you seriously. I can help as I did before, but you know that I am not knowledgeable about the subject matter, although I have copy edited other wrestling articles, like  for [[User:GaryColemanFan]]. (He is good at explaining plots and back stories.) Happy 2009 - lets make it a good year! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:59, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269047 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 269042 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.231063860E09 +++$+++ Let me just tell you now, I'm not asking for your help or really need it. I don't know where you are getting that from. Sorry if I sound like an ass, I'm trying to say it nicely. I'm just sharing my ideas. I want to say thanks again for the copyedit on Lockdown and for supporting the article in its FAC. If I need help again you'll be the first I ask. I tend to like to work alone, mainly because I'm hard to work with on some areas.-- +++$+++ ::Let me just tell you now, I'm not asking for your help or really need it. I don't know where you are getting that from. Sorry if I sound like an ass, I'm trying to say it nicely. I'm just sharing my ideas. I want to say thanks again for the copyedit on Lockdown and for supporting the article in its FAC. If I need help again you'll be the first I ask. I tend to like to work alone, mainly because I'm hard to work with on some areas.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 02:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269048 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 269047 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.231064160E09 +++$+++ I know. Everything I do is completely voluntary at Wikipedia. I changed some things on [[Slammiversary (2008)]] - hope you don't mind. Just that I have become familiar with certain requirements for GA and FAC as I do a lot of reviews and copy editing  - no big deal.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I know. Everything I do is completely voluntary at Wikipedia. I changed some things on [[Slammiversary (2008)]] - hope you don't mind. Just that I have become familiar with certain requirements for GA and FAC as I do a lot of reviews and copy editing  - no big deal.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269049 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 269042 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.231064640E09 +++$+++ Okay, I don't mind. I need to clean up that article anyway. I did it in a rush back in October to get three on GAN. Two of them have passed already: [[No Surrender (2008)]] and [[Hard Justice (2008)]]. Slammiversary is the only one left and I have to change alot of things in it when someone undertakes the GA review, which I hope is soon since it is the oldest article on GAN right now. Strangely most of mine become the oldest. Lockdown was, [[Sacrifice (2008)|Sacrifice]] was, Hard Justice was, and now Slammiversary. It is weird.-- +++$+++ ::Okay, I don't mind. I need to clean up that article anyway. I did it in a rush back in October to get three on GAN. Two of them have passed already: [[No Surrender (2008)]] and [[Hard Justice (2008)]]. Slammiversary is the only one left and I have to change alot of things in it when someone undertakes the GA review, which I hope is soon since it is the oldest article on GAN right now. Strangely most of mine become the oldest. Lockdown was, [[Sacrifice (2008)|Sacrifice]] was, Hard Justice was, and now Slammiversary. It is weird.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 02:24, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269050 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 269049 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.231065780E09 +++$+++ It's because the articles are long, and wrestling articles are hard to follow for those not knowing the subject. I did my first one because it had been hanging around forever. I finally had to say to the editor, \"this article makes no sense to me!\" The editor fixed it in a day or two so it did make sense. Meanwhile, I was getting used to the scripts etc. so now I am not so overwhelmed by them. Also, I know the links to wikilink to, which really helps.   &mdash; +++$+++ :::It's because the articles are long, and wrestling articles are hard to follow for those not knowing the subject. I did my first one because it had been hanging around forever. I finally had to say to the editor, "this article makes no sense to me!" The editor fixed it in a day or two so it did make sense. Meanwhile, I was getting used to the scripts etc. so now I am not so overwhelmed by them. Also, I know the links to wikilink to, which really helps.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269051 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.231072440E09 +++$+++ Yeah, they are hard unless your understand what the subject is about. I don't review any articles on GAN because of it. Though I will soon to help get the backlog down. There is the problem. Are articles that are promoted to GA really Good articles. See, someone like me wouldn't know the regulations for a film article or video game. I haven't read the full manual of style article. Plus I haven't read the Video game and films project's MoS pages. I think GAN should be more like FAC. It is made on a poll of votes rather than one person.-- +++$+++ :Yeah, they are hard unless your understand what the subject is about. I don't review any articles on GAN because of it. Though I will soon to help get the backlog down. There is the problem. Are articles that are promoted to GA really Good articles. See, someone like me wouldn't know the regulations for a film article or video game. I haven't read the full manual of style article. Plus I haven't read the Video game and films project's MoS pages. I think GAN should be more like FAC. It is made on a poll of votes rather than one person.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 04:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269052 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 269051 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.231073520E09 +++$+++ You can look at the various project standards, eg [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films]] for their standards,  and also look at various FA articles in whatever category of relevance. That is better than reading the whole MoS, which I agree is useless, mind numbing and confusing.  But you can look up specific issues on Mos, like \"Quotations\"  etc. and just read the specific issues involved. I agree that \"becoming familiar\" with th entire Mos is a waste of time. Reviewing an article in an unfamiliar areao is a great way of learning about aritlce construction and requirement. At least it has been for me.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::You can look at the various project standards, eg [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films]] for their standards,  and also look at various FA articles in whatever category of relevance. That is better than reading the whole MoS, which I agree is useless, mind numbing and confusing.  But you can look up specific issues on Mos, like "Quotations"  etc. and just read the specific issues involved. I agree that "becoming familiar" with th entire Mos is a waste of time. Reviewing an article in an unfamiliar areao is a great way of learning about aritlce construction and requirement. At least it has been for me.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:52, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269053 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 269041 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.231076940E09 +++$+++ Okay, I wouldn't say the MoS is useless. I just think it is entirely too long and too many extra articles to read.-- +++$+++ :Okay, I wouldn't say the MoS is useless. I just think it is entirely too long and too many extra articles to read.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 05:49, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

531187 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531187 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-11 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.284193380E09 +++$+++ What is you opinion on the newer made NASCAR results legend? It is located '''[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR#Colour used to indicate .22did not finish.22 in NASCAR results tables|here]]'''. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ What is you opinion on the newer made NASCAR results legend? It is located '''[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR#Colour used to indicate .22did not finish.22 in NASCAR results tables|here]]'''. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 01:23, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
531188 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531187 +++$+++ 531187 +++$+++ 2010-09-17 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.284790620E09 +++$+++ I would also like to ask you one more question, concerning the results legend: Do you think it should be required for all NASCAR related drivers to have one, in which is complete and useful for everyone? How should I get the word out to help contruct these very large tables? Thank you and Happy editing. ~ '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ :I would also like to ask you one more question, concerning the results legend: Do you think it should be required for all NASCAR related drivers to have one, in which is complete and useful for everyone? How should I get the word out to help contruct these very large tables? Thank you and Happy editing. ~ '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 23:17, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
531189 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531187 +++$+++ 531188 +++$+++ 2010-09-18 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.284860220E09 +++$+++ I don't think they should be required, optional only. They're too much work. I've seen them frowned upon in the past for featured articles because [[WP:NOT#STATS]]. My editing should picking up significantly in a month or so when the local racing scene gets done for the winter. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I don't think they should be required, optional only. They're too much work. I've seen them frowned upon in the past for featured articles because [[WP:NOT#STATS]]. My editing should picking up significantly in a month or so when the local racing scene gets done for the winter. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 18:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
531190 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531187 +++$+++ 531189 +++$+++ 2010-09-18 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.284861120E09 +++$+++ Okay, I think it would be nice to see you around more. :) After I have thought more about it, wouldn't it be required on the season articles? '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ :::Okay, I think it would be nice to see you around more. :) After I have thought more about it, wouldn't it be required on the season articles? '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 18:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

6902 +++$+++ Loonymonkey +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-15 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.224116820E09 +++$+++ Please see [[WP:Administrators_noticeboard\/Incidents#Legal_threats_by_RonCram]]. -- +++$+++ Please see [[WP:Administrators_noticeboard/Incidents#Legal_threats_by_RonCram]]. --[[User:Loonymonkey|Loonymonkey]] ([[User talk:Loonymonkey|talk]]) 17:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
6903 +++$+++ Barneca +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6902 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.224118440E09 +++$+++ The legal threats you made above are silly enough that I don't think any of the people you're arguing with are dumb enough to feel threatened, so I won't block you for any threats already made.  However, you've made your point.  Any ''further'' mention of the possibility of a lawsuit, whether filed by you, or filed by someone else, will earn you a block based on [[WP:NLT]], for using threats of a lawsuit as a bludgeon to get your way in an arguement, and you can continue to argue from inside an unblock template. -- +++$+++ :::The legal threats you made above are silly enough that I don't think any of the people you're arguing with are dumb enough to feel threatened, so I won't block you for any threats already made.  However, you've made your point.  Any ''further'' mention of the possibility of a lawsuit, whether filed by you, or filed by someone else, will earn you a block based on [[WP:NLT]], for using threats of a lawsuit as a bludgeon to get your way in an arguement, and you can continue to argue from inside an unblock template. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca|talk]]) 17:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
6904 +++$+++ SheffieldSteel +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6902 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.224119220E09 +++$+++ If you have a disagreement about whether a particular source is reliable, take it to the [[WP:RSN|reliable sources noticeboard]]. Meanwhile, this disruption must stop. <font color=\"006622\"> +++$+++ ::::If you have a disagreement about whether a particular source is reliable, take it to the [[WP:RSN|reliable sources noticeboard]]. Meanwhile, this disruption must stop. <font color="006622">[[User:SheffieldSteel|S<small>HEFFIELD</small>S<small>TEEL</small>]]</font><sup><small><b>[[User_talk:SheffieldSteel|TALK]]</b></small></sup> 18:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
6905 +++$+++ TravisTX +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6902 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.224124080E09 +++$+++ Listen, RonCram, as a conservative, ''I don\u2019t consider WND to be a reliable source''. In fact, I don\u2019t find WND to be any more reliable than, say, [[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]]. In any case, stating that they do not meet the Wikipedia [[WP:RS|reliable source]] standards is in no way [[defamation]]. \u2014 +++$+++ ::Listen, RonCram, as a conservative, ''I don’t consider WND to be a reliable source''. In fact, I don’t find WND to be any more reliable than, say, [[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]]. In any case, stating that they do not meet the Wikipedia [[WP:RS|reliable source]] standards is in no way [[defamation]]. —[[User:TravisTX|<font face="Verdana" color="#2F335F">Travis</font>]][[User_talk:TravisTX|<font color="#888888" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 19:28, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

569129 +++$+++ Wikiwoohoo +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569129 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-10 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.163217660E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'm not an admin but I was wondering if this would still allow me to semi-protect certain pages that have been vandalised quite often within the past few days. If not, how could I go about having this assigned to articles?  +++$+++ Hi. I'm not an admin but I was wondering if this would still allow me to semi-protect certain pages that have been vandalised quite often within the past few days. If not, how could I go about having this assigned to articles? [[User:Wikiwoohoo|Wikiwoohoo]] 20:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
569130 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569129 +++$+++ 569129 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.163218320E09 +++$+++ Hello!  Take your business case for semi-protection to [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection]].  It will be assessed and granted\/refused after a discussion.  +++$+++ :Hello!  Take your business case for semi-protection to [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection]].  It will be assessed and granted/refused after a discussion. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 20:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

6906 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-16 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.224152580E09 +++$+++ Thank you for inviting me to this discussion.  I learned alot, especially about the hundreds of times WorldNetDaily has been quoted in Wikipedia here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:LinkSearch&target=http%3A%2F%2F%2A.worldnetdaily.com&limit=1500&offset=0]. So it seems the Wikipedia community really does see WorldNetDaily as RS after all.  Isn't that interesting?  +++$+++ Thank you for inviting me to this discussion.  I learned alot, especially about the hundreds of times WorldNetDaily has been quoted in Wikipedia here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LinkSearch&target=http%3A%2F%2F%2A.worldnetdaily.com&limit=1500&offset=0]. So it seems the Wikipedia community really does see WorldNetDaily as RS after all.  Isn't that interesting? [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 03:23, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
6907 +++$+++ SheffieldSteel +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6906 +++$+++ 6906 +++$+++ 2008-10-16 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.224196560E09 +++$+++ I think [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&as_q=worldnetdaily&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&lr=lang_en&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=en.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWikipedia%3AReliable_sources%2FNoticeboard&as_qdr=all&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=off this] search is more to the point. Please note that pointing to other Wikipedia articles as establishing precedent is generally seen as a poor argument (see for example [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]]). Regards,  <font color=\"006622\"> +++$+++ :I think [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&as_q=worldnetdaily&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&lr=lang_en&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=en.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWikipedia%3AReliable_sources%2FNoticeboard&as_qdr=all&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=off this] search is more to the point. Please note that pointing to other Wikipedia articles as establishing precedent is generally seen as a poor argument (see for example [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]]). Regards,  <font color="006622">[[User:SheffieldSteel|S<small>HEFFIELD</small>S<small>TEEL</small>]]</font><sup><small><b>[[User_talk:SheffieldSteel|TALK]]</b></small></sup> 15:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
6908 +++$+++ Jaysweet +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6906 +++$+++ 6907 +++$+++ 2008-10-16 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.224197820E09 +++$+++ No no, I think RonCram has a point.  Clearly, Cashill's theory should be given appropriate coverage on Wikipedia.  Emphasis on the word ''appropriate''.  I think [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Jack_Cashill&diff=245687074&oldid=245160751 this] is just about right...  Hey, and you can even used WND to cite it! -- +++$+++ ::No no, I think RonCram has a point.  Clearly, Cashill's theory should be given appropriate coverage on Wikipedia.  Emphasis on the word ''appropriate''.  I think [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jack_Cashill&diff=245687074&oldid=245160751 this] is just about right...  Hey, and you can even used WND to cite it! --[[User:Jaysweet|Jaysweet]] ([[User talk:Jaysweet|talk]]) 15:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
6909 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6906 +++$+++ 6908 +++$+++ 2008-10-17 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.224272760E09 +++$+++ This really has been interesting and educational.  Previously, I was informed that op-ed pieces are not RS and cannot be cited on Wikipedia.  I was surprised to learn op-ed pieces are RS as long as they criticize conservatives or conservative publications like [[WorldNetDaily]]. The [[WorldNetDaily]] article calls the website \"unreliable\" and links to this. [http:\/\/seattlepi.com\/opinion\/375947_youngonline22.html] Not only is this an op-ed piece, it does not use the term unreliable. The same claim of unreliability also links to a critical op-ed piece by Media Matters which criticizes CBS News for publishing the same report as WND. Interestingly, Wikipedia editors critical of WND do not consider CBS News unreliable. [http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/items\/200710150007]  +++$+++ :::This really has been interesting and educational.  Previously, I was informed that op-ed pieces are not RS and cannot be cited on Wikipedia.  I was surprised to learn op-ed pieces are RS as long as they criticize conservatives or conservative publications like [[WorldNetDaily]]. The [[WorldNetDaily]] article calls the website "unreliable" and links to this. [http://seattlepi.com/opinion/375947_youngonline22.html] Not only is this an op-ed piece, it does not use the term unreliable. The same claim of unreliability also links to a critical op-ed piece by Media Matters which criticizes CBS News for publishing the same report as WND. Interestingly, Wikipedia editors critical of WND do not consider CBS News unreliable. [http://mediamatters.org/items/200710150007] [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 12:46, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

531195 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531195 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-02 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.286058360E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for the photos for the article on the Shrine of Our Lady of Good Hope. Bishop Ricken formed a commission to look into the Marian apparations of Sr. Adele. I would not be too surprise if the shrine is made a minor basilica. I am starting to write articles again and the bots are quiet as far as I am concern. The former Wisconsin Superintendent of Public Instruction Barbara Thompson died recently so I started an article. I hope you are well- +++$+++ Many thanks for the photos for the article on the Shrine of Our Lady of Good Hope. Bishop Ricken formed a commission to look into the Marian apparations of Sr. Adele. I would not be too surprise if the shrine is made a minor basilica. I am starting to write articles again and the bots are quiet as far as I am concern. The former Wisconsin Superintendent of Public Instruction Barbara Thompson died recently so I started an article. I hope you are well-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 15:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
531196 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531195 +++$+++ 531195 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.286102400E09 +++$+++ The Shrine was very nice, I'm glad I went there on the way to the Fall Special races at nearby Luxemburg Speedway. I was meaning to thank YOU for the great expansions you did to those articles that I just created. Maybe we can meet next weekend at the nice little chapel when I come to your town. We should talk offline by email. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :The Shrine was very nice, I'm glad I went there on the way to the Fall Special races at nearby Luxemburg Speedway. I was meaning to thank YOU for the great expansions you did to those articles that I just created. Maybe we can meet next weekend at the nice little chapel when I come to your town. We should talk offline by email. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

531197 +++$+++ Cs-wolves +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531197 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-03 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.286171820E09 +++$+++ Why hello there, Royalbroil; just a quick question for you to consider. I have edited the IndyCar season infobox for the capability to include the new oval\/road champions that the series has seemingly introduced to the series ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=2010_IndyCar_Series_season&diff=prev&oldid=388552519 like so]). However, another user has employed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=2010_IndyCar_Series_season&oldid=388558295 a break] way of showing the champions. Which method is more suitable, in your opinion? Kind regards, <font face=\"Zemestro\"> +++$+++ Why hello there, Royalbroil; just a quick question for you to consider. I have edited the IndyCar season infobox for the capability to include the new oval/road champions that the series has seemingly introduced to the series ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2010_IndyCar_Series_season&diff=prev&oldid=388552519 like so]). However, another user has employed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2010_IndyCar_Series_season&oldid=388558295 a break] way of showing the champions. Which method is more suitable, in your opinion? Kind regards, <font face="Zemestro">[[User:Cs-wolves|<span style="color:black;background:gold">Cs-wolves</span>]][[User talk:Cs-wolves|<span style="color:gold;background:black">(talk)</span>]]</font> 22:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
531198 +++$+++ Cs-wolves +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531197 +++$+++ 531197 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.286172060E09 +++$+++ You might not need to worry; another user prefers the parameters. :) <font face=\"Zemestro\"> +++$+++ :You might not need to worry; another user prefers the parameters. :) <font face="Zemestro">[[User:Cs-wolves|<span style="color:black;background:gold">Cs-wolves</span>]][[User talk:Cs-wolves|<span style="color:gold;background:black">(talk)</span>]]</font> 23:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

269054 +++$+++ Wildroot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-04 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.231059900E09 +++$+++ You have my permission to copy-edit as much as you want.  +++$+++ You have my permission to copy-edit as much as you want. [[User:Wildroot|Wildroot]] ([[User talk:Wildroot|talk]]) 01:05, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269055 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269054 +++$+++ 269054 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.231060020E09 +++$+++ Thanks! &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

6911 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6911 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-29 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.225315320E09 +++$+++ Consider this a warning for posting [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248406959 specious conspiracy theories] on the talk pages of BLP articles. Don't do that again, please.  +++$+++ Consider this a warning for posting [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248406959 specious conspiracy theories] on the talk pages of BLP articles. Don't do that again, please. [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 14:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
6912 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6911 +++$+++ 6911 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.225315380E09 +++$+++ These are not specious conspiracy theories.  They are well sourced. +++$+++ :These are not specious conspiracy theories.  They are well sourced.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 14:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

6913 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-29 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.225328640E09 +++$+++ This edit[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248405584] is an attack on other editors and a conspiracy theory.  These edits[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248406126][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248421439] are conspiracy theories.  These edits[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248423584][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248423723][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248427378] are disruptive edit warring on the talk page.  Do not re-open discussions closed by the community at [[Talk:Barack Obama]].  Please take break from this activity on the Barack Obama talk page, or else an administrator may decide to take action to prevent further disruption on that page. +++$+++ This edit[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248405584] is an attack on other editors and a conspiracy theory.  These edits[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248406126][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248421439] are conspiracy theories.  These edits[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248423584][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248423723][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=248427378] are disruptive edit warring on the talk page.  Do not re-open discussions closed by the community at [[Talk:Barack Obama]].  Please take break from this activity on the Barack Obama talk page, or else an administrator may decide to take action to prevent further disruption on that page.[[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 18:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
6914 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.225334100E09 +++$+++ You are wrong.  The information I referenced is from Los Angeles Times, Sun Sentinel, FOX News and WorldNetDaily.  All of them are reliable sources.  I understand that people are particularly protective of a BLP during an election.  I do not think Wikipedia should be used to change the outcome of an election, but the article in its current condition is contrary to Wikipedia policy [[NPOV]].  [[WP:BLP]] allows criticism of individuals as long as it is well-sourced.  Discussions should not be closed pre-maturely.  The closing of a discussion is the act of one editor and was wrongful.  I acting under the guideline of Edit Boldly.  Editors need to know that the article will change after the election.  +++$+++ :You are wrong.  The information I referenced is from Los Angeles Times, Sun Sentinel, FOX News and WorldNetDaily.  All of them are reliable sources.  I understand that people are particularly protective of a BLP during an election.  I do not think Wikipedia should be used to change the outcome of an election, but the article in its current condition is contrary to Wikipedia policy [[NPOV]].  [[WP:BLP]] allows criticism of individuals as long as it is well-sourced.  Discussions should not be closed pre-maturely.  The closing of a discussion is the act of one editor and was wrongful.  I acting under the guideline of Edit Boldly.  Editors need to know that the article will change after the election. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 19:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
6915 +++$+++ GoodDamon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ 6914 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.225334940E09 +++$+++ Please consider for a moment, based on your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ARonCram block log], that you are incorrect. A conspiracy theory synthesized from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] is still unacceptable, especially when those sources do not even peripherally support your claim. For instance, in one of your edits you label Khalidi a \"known PLO (terror organization) activist.\" That is not only an unacceptable BLP violation, but not even supported by your sources, which label neither the PLO a terror organization nor Khalidi a terrorist. To be blunt, you are '''lying''', and disregarding the fact that Khalidi himself has regularly received support from both Democrats and Republicans, including John McCain. You apparently desire to unjustly smear Khalidi, and hope that the smear rubs off on Obama. It's time for you to take a step back and ask yourself why you're editing Wikipedia, because you appear to have a [[WP:POINT|point]] to make. If that is the case, I strongly urge you to edit in a different area, before you find yourself blocked on a more long-term basis. --<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ ::Please consider for a moment, based on your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ARonCram block log], that you are incorrect. A conspiracy theory synthesized from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] is still unacceptable, especially when those sources do not even peripherally support your claim. For instance, in one of your edits you label Khalidi a "known PLO (terror organization) activist." That is not only an unacceptable BLP violation, but not even supported by your sources, which label neither the PLO a terror organization nor Khalidi a terrorist. To be blunt, you are '''lying''', and disregarding the fact that Khalidi himself has regularly received support from both Democrats and Republicans, including John McCain. You apparently desire to unjustly smear Khalidi, and hope that the smear rubs off on Obama. It's time for you to take a step back and ask yourself why you're editing Wikipedia, because you appear to have a [[WP:POINT|point]] to make. If that is the case, I strongly urge you to edit in a different area, before you find yourself blocked on a more long-term basis. --<font color="green">[[User:GoodDamon|Good]]</font>[[User_talk:GoodDamon|Damon]] 19:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
6916 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ 2008-10-30 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.225378020E09 +++$+++ You have just reverted two [[WP:BLP]] violations back into the article.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ABarack_Obama&diff=248563272&oldid=248559896]  That is blockable.  Please stop at once. +++$+++ :You have just reverted two [[WP:BLP]] violations back into the article.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABarack_Obama&diff=248563272&oldid=248559896]  That is blockable.  Please stop at once.[[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 07:47, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
6917 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ 6916 +++$+++ 2008-10-30 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.225399680E09 +++$+++ I had restated the comments so they did not go beyond what was supported by my citations.  My comments have been redacted again.  This is censorship plain and simple.  But I do not wish to edit war over it.  If others are interested in the censorship, they can check the history and see for themselves exactly what happened.  +++$+++ ::I had restated the comments so they did not go beyond what was supported by my citations.  My comments have been redacted again.  This is censorship plain and simple.  But I do not wish to edit war over it.  If others are interested in the censorship, they can check the history and see for themselves exactly what happened. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 13:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
6918 +++$+++ GoodDamon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ 6917 +++$+++ 2008-10-30 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.225400700E09 +++$+++ [[WP:BLP]] applies to talk pages, too. If you're going to claim 1) That a living person is a terrorist, and 2) that another living person supports said terrorist, you had damn well better have a '''news''' article, not opinion piece, from nothing short of the New York Times or the Washington Post, stating '''as a fact''' (not an opinion) that the person is indeed a terrorist. That is the bar you must pass, and you must pass it cleanly. There is zero wiggle room. Wikidemon was right to remove your comments, because they were still gross BLP violations. Do not bring them up again, unless your sources are as I describe above. This is '''not''' censorship, this is a desire not to see Wikipedia sued for libel, which is what you are committing when you make such poorly-sourced claims. Stop now. --<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :::[[WP:BLP]] applies to talk pages, too. If you're going to claim 1) That a living person is a terrorist, and 2) that another living person supports said terrorist, you had damn well better have a '''news''' article, not opinion piece, from nothing short of the New York Times or the Washington Post, stating '''as a fact''' (not an opinion) that the person is indeed a terrorist. That is the bar you must pass, and you must pass it cleanly. There is zero wiggle room. Wikidemon was right to remove your comments, because they were still gross BLP violations. Do not bring them up again, unless your sources are as I describe above. This is '''not''' censorship, this is a desire not to see Wikipedia sued for libel, which is what you are committing when you make such poorly-sourced claims. Stop now. --<font color="green">[[User:GoodDamon|Good]]</font>[[User_talk:GoodDamon|Damon]] 14:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
6919 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ 6918 +++$+++ 2008-10-30 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.225412820E09 +++$+++ There are plenty of news articles about Khalidi being tied to the PLO.  Did you bother to read the articles I cited? It would help if you did before you delete stuff. You might even try reading the Wikipedia article on [[Rashid Khalidi]] where you will learn he served on the Guidance Committee of the PLO for the Madrid Conference. This is not a secret, nor is it disputed in any way.  The only thing Khalidi has disputed is that he was an official spokesman for the PLO, although he obviously served as an unofficial spokesman using the word \"we\" in his comments regarding the PLO - as the news article I cited shows. Also, yo u have too high a regard for the NY Times and Wash Post.  While they meet the requirement of having editorial oversight, they have published many false stories. They are no more reliable than many media sources.  +++$+++ ::::There are plenty of news articles about Khalidi being tied to the PLO.  Did you bother to read the articles I cited? It would help if you did before you delete stuff. You might even try reading the Wikipedia article on [[Rashid Khalidi]] where you will learn he served on the Guidance Committee of the PLO for the Madrid Conference. This is not a secret, nor is it disputed in any way.  The only thing Khalidi has disputed is that he was an official spokesman for the PLO, although he obviously served as an unofficial spokesman using the word "we" in his comments regarding the PLO - as the news article I cited shows. Also, yo u have too high a regard for the NY Times and Wash Post.  While they meet the requirement of having editorial oversight, they have published many false stories. They are no more reliable than many media sources. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 17:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
6920 +++$+++ GoodDamon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ 6919 +++$+++ 2008-10-30 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.225414200E09 +++$+++ That's all Khalidi has to dispute. Anything else -- such as that he was \"an unofficial spokesman\" is pure conjecture. Look... There are plenty of discredited blog posts making the same accusations, and news stories reporting '''on the accusations''' that he is tied to the PLO, but no reputable news stories stating as fact that he is. And those reports on the accusations also report on him and others disputing them. ''Read your sources''. They do not state as fact that he is tied to the PLO. This is an important distinction. If a news story states as an unequivocal fact that he is, that's one thing. If a news story simply repeats the claims of others, attributing to them no factual basis one way or the other, that is another matter entirely. You have to stop committing these BLP violations immediately, because they literally endanger Wikipedia itself. We don't defame people here. Please tell me you understand this, and will refrain from introducing controversial statements about living persons without absolutely bullet-proof sources from now on. And as for why I listed the New York Times and the Washington Post specifically? Per [[Wikipedia:RS#News_organizations]]: \"Material from mainstream news organizations is welcomed, particularly the high-quality end of the market, such as The Washington Post, The Times in Britain, and The Associated Press.\" Newspapers of that level don't just \"meet the requirement,\" they are the cream of the crop. --<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :::::That's all Khalidi has to dispute. Anything else -- such as that he was "an unofficial spokesman" is pure conjecture. Look... There are plenty of discredited blog posts making the same accusations, and news stories reporting '''on the accusations''' that he is tied to the PLO, but no reputable news stories stating as fact that he is. And those reports on the accusations also report on him and others disputing them. ''Read your sources''. They do not state as fact that he is tied to the PLO. This is an important distinction. If a news story states as an unequivocal fact that he is, that's one thing. If a news story simply repeats the claims of others, attributing to them no factual basis one way or the other, that is another matter entirely. You have to stop committing these BLP violations immediately, because they literally endanger Wikipedia itself. We don't defame people here. Please tell me you understand this, and will refrain from introducing controversial statements about living persons without absolutely bullet-proof sources from now on. And as for why I listed the New York Times and the Washington Post specifically? Per [[Wikipedia:RS#News_organizations]]: "Material from mainstream news organizations is welcomed, particularly the high-quality end of the market, such as The Washington Post, The Times in Britain, and The Associated Press." Newspapers of that level don't just "meet the requirement," they are the cream of the crop. --<font color="green">[[User:GoodDamon|Good]]</font>[[User_talk:GoodDamon|Damon]] 17:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
6921 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ 6920 +++$+++ 2008-10-30 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.225414500E09 +++$+++ You are wrong.  I provided an article which you obviously have not bothered to read.  It shows a photocopy of an an earlier news article quoting Khalidi saying \"we\" when referring to the PLO.  Khalidi does not dispute he was part of the Guidance Committee for the PLO.  He only disputes being a paid employee.  That's fine.  I did not say he was on the payroll, but that he was tied to the PLO at a time when the PLO was a designated terrorist organization.  Those are the facts and no one disputes them.  +++$+++ ::::::You are wrong.  I provided an article which you obviously have not bothered to read.  It shows a photocopy of an an earlier news article quoting Khalidi saying "we" when referring to the PLO.  Khalidi does not dispute he was part of the Guidance Committee for the PLO.  He only disputes being a paid employee.  That's fine.  I did not say he was on the payroll, but that he was tied to the PLO at a time when the PLO was a designated terrorist organization.  Those are the facts and no one disputes them. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 17:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
6922 +++$+++ GoodDamon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ 6921 +++$+++ 2008-10-30 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.225415220E09 +++$+++ Not true. I did read your sources. Including that ludicrous CNS \"News\" article. CNS is not a reliable source. It's not even close. It wears its partisan slant right on its sleeve. If you want to source anything to that New York Times article, that's fine, but you had better get the whole article, not that carefully out-of-context excerpt. Do me a favor; avoid right-wing partisan blogs and \"news\" sources, and I'll avoid DailyKos and firedoglake, OK? --<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :::::::Not true. I did read your sources. Including that ludicrous CNS "News" article. CNS is not a reliable source. It's not even close. It wears its partisan slant right on its sleeve. If you want to source anything to that New York Times article, that's fine, but you had better get the whole article, not that carefully out-of-context excerpt. Do me a favor; avoid right-wing partisan blogs and "news" sources, and I'll avoid DailyKos and firedoglake, OK? --<font color="green">[[User:GoodDamon|Good]]</font>[[User_talk:GoodDamon|Damon]] 18:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
6923 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6913 +++$+++ 6922 +++$+++ 2008-10-30 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.225420080E09 +++$+++ No deal.  DailyKos and the other blog has no editorial oversight.  CNS News does.  The question is not whether a media outlet is slanted or not.  They are ALL slanted in that they cover the news that fits their worldview. The question is whether or not the reported news is reliable.  CNS News showed a picture from a NY Times article. You can order the article here. [http:\/\/select.nytimes.com\/gst\/abstract.html?res=F50914F93E5D12728DDDA80994DE405B898BF1D3&scp=1&sq=khalidi%20al%20fatah%201979&st=cse]  If this was not accurate, it would come out. In fact, you can email the Times and ask them to research it and write an article blasting CNS News if it is not accurate.  The Times would love to do that.  If the Times says it is not accurate, then I would withdraw it.  +++$+++ ::::::::No deal.  DailyKos and the other blog has no editorial oversight.  CNS News does.  The question is not whether a media outlet is slanted or not.  They are ALL slanted in that they cover the news that fits their worldview. The question is whether or not the reported news is reliable.  CNS News showed a picture from a NY Times article. You can order the article here. [http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50914F93E5D12728DDDA80994DE405B898BF1D3&scp=1&sq=khalidi%20al%20fatah%201979&st=cse]  If this was not accurate, it would come out. In fact, you can email the Times and ask them to research it and write an article blasting CNS News if it is not accurate.  The Times would love to do that.  If the Times says it is not accurate, then I would withdraw it. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 19:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

269058 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269058 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-05 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.231142820E09 +++$+++ [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 00:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
269059 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269058 +++$+++ 269058 +++$+++ 2009-01-05 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.231145100E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Ling.Nut. I have always felt your kindness. Regards,  &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you, Ling.Nut. I have always felt your kindness. Regards,  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

269060 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269060 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-04 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.231105380E09 +++$+++ you are right in that I would recuse from an arb case involving you as you noted [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACasliber&diff=260019654&oldid=260018694 here]. However, that is not the next step. Generally, one asks for [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Mattisse 3|this]] as a venue for community discussion, given you either cannot or will not take on board what has been explained to you before. Cheers,  +++$+++ you are right in that I would recuse from an arb case involving you as you noted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACasliber&diff=260019654&oldid=260018694 here]. However, that is not the next step. Generally, one asks for [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mattisse 3|this]] as a venue for community discussion, given you either cannot or will not take on board what has been explained to you before. Cheers, [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 13:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269061 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269060 +++$+++ 269060 +++$+++ 2009-01-05 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.231213980E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I hope you will respond on the RfC.  It is not meant to be a lynch-mob, and it is very important that your point of view be included.  That will help everyone reading it to try to put things in more perspective.  I realize it hasn't been long since this was launched and you might be busy, but I wanted to ask\/remind anyway.  +++$+++ :Mattisse, I hope you will respond on the RfC.  It is not meant to be a lynch-mob, and it is very important that your point of view be included.  That will help everyone reading it to try to put things in more perspective.  I realize it hasn't been long since this was launched and you might be busy, but I wanted to ask/remind anyway. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 19:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

269062 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-04 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.231138920E09 +++$+++ The event is at the crossroads of several conflicting points of view. First, any article related to Prem Rawat is an emotional issue because some editors here are followers\/students of his who have a very high opinion of him, while other editors are former followers\/students who have a very low opinion of him. Those two groups will never reconcile or agree. The majority of the editors on both sides are single purpose accounts who only edit on this topic. It's all they care about. (FYI, I'm not a former or current follower, and I don't know any personally.) Another aspect of this topic with emotional resonance, which just came up on the talk page, is that in the past followers considered Rawat to be God - at the very least a successor to, or reincarnation of, Jesus, Krishna, Buddha, et al and even the oominsicent, omnipotent god of all things. Followers do not say that anymore and do not like the old claims to be remembered. (In the early 1980s, Rawat ordered the destruction of all previous publications and recordings from the movement as part of the change in approach.) The event, and the press conference in particular, marks one of the few documented occasions when Rawat was questioned about those claims. Followers were also quoted or interviewed about the claims much more extensively than at any other time or place. Third, the event was pivotal in the history of the movement. It went from being what was called the fastest growing new religious movement in the West to a marginal sect. While there were other factors, the failure of the festival and the poor press that resulted were key elements in that dramatic change. What does all of this mean for [[Millennium '73]]? The article itself has been remarkably stable since it was posted in August. Text has been moved around, added or deleted, but on the whole the article hasn't changed very significantly. There have been no edit wars or major policy-related disputes. Editors who are followers\/students would like some details removed but those  are well-sourced and presented neutrally (IMO) so their inclusion or exclusion is just a matter of editorial judgment and not a policy issue. In related articles, some editors have argued at length over how to summarize quotes, which is why I've been reluctant to do so. However the good news is that there don't seem to have been any disagreements over the summarizations I've done since the GAN began. I think that is a good omen for the future stability of the article, even though it's part of a emotionally charged topic. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ The event is at the crossroads of several conflicting points of view. First, any article related to Prem Rawat is an emotional issue because some editors here are followers/students of his who have a very high opinion of him, while other editors are former followers/students who have a very low opinion of him. Those two groups will never reconcile or agree. The majority of the editors on both sides are single purpose accounts who only edit on this topic. It's all they care about. (FYI, I'm not a former or current follower, and I don't know any personally.) Another aspect of this topic with emotional resonance, which just came up on the talk page, is that in the past followers considered Rawat to be God - at the very least a successor to, or reincarnation of, Jesus, Krishna, Buddha, et al and even the oominsicent, omnipotent god of all things. Followers do not say that anymore and do not like the old claims to be remembered. (In the early 1980s, Rawat ordered the destruction of all previous publications and recordings from the movement as part of the change in approach.) The event, and the press conference in particular, marks one of the few documented occasions when Rawat was questioned about those claims. Followers were also quoted or interviewed about the claims much more extensively than at any other time or place. Third, the event was pivotal in the history of the movement. It went from being what was called the fastest growing new religious movement in the West to a marginal sect. While there were other factors, the failure of the festival and the poor press that resulted were key elements in that dramatic change. What does all of this mean for [[Millennium '73]]? The article itself has been remarkably stable since it was posted in August. Text has been moved around, added or deleted, but on the whole the article hasn't changed very significantly. There have been no edit wars or major policy-related disputes. Editors who are followers/students would like some details removed but those  are well-sourced and presented neutrally (IMO) so their inclusion or exclusion is just a matter of editorial judgment and not a policy issue. In related articles, some editors have argued at length over how to summarize quotes, which is why I've been reluctant to do so. However the good news is that there don't seem to have been any disagreements over the summarizations I've done since the GAN began. I think that is a good omen for the future stability of the article, even though it's part of a emotionally charged topic. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 23:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269063 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269062 +++$+++ 269062 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.231139400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the explanation on why this event is so important as a turning point. And thanks for the relatively hopeful outlook regarding the future of the article. (I am relieved.) Actually, I had been noticing, compared to some politically charged article, the talk page has heen calm and civil. I will let you go through move of your summarizing and then take another look at it. Let me know if you need my help for anything. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks for the explanation on why this event is so important as a turning point. And thanks for the relatively hopeful outlook regarding the future of the article. (I am relieved.) Actually, I had been noticing, compared to some politically charged article, the talk page has heen calm and civil. I will let you go through move of your summarizing and then take another look at it. Let me know if you need my help for anything. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
269064 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269062 +++$+++ 269063 +++$+++ 2009-01-05 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.231153920E09 +++$+++ I saw your note on the talk page. I'm sorry you're leaving and I hope you'll return. Unless you have a better idea, probably the best thing to do with the Millennium article is to close the GAN as unresolved and relist it again. I'll do that if I don't hear back from you. Best wishes.   &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::I saw your note on the talk page. I'm sorry you're leaving and I hope you'll return. Unless you have a better idea, probably the best thing to do with the Millennium article is to close the GAN as unresolved and relist it again. I'll do that if I don't hear back from you. Best wishes.   &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 03:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
269065 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269062 +++$+++ 269064 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.231256520E09 +++$+++ I'm going to be travelling for a couple of weeks, so I won't be able to work anymore on the article. Personally, I think it meets the GA criteria, but that's for you to determine. I'd appreciate it if you could pass or fail the article as it is now. (I know you're understandably pre-occupied with that RfC. It's regretable that such things interfere with improving the encyclopedia.) &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::I'm going to be travelling for a couple of weeks, so I won't be able to work anymore on the article. Personally, I think it meets the GA criteria, but that's for you to determine. I'd appreciate it if you could pass or fail the article as it is now. (I know you're understandably pre-occupied with that RfC. It's regretable that such things interfere with improving the encyclopedia.) &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 07:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
269066 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269062 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 07:48:00 +++$+++ 1.231256880E09 +++$+++ I have already notified GAN that I have withdrawn from reviewing any articles. I am leaving Wikipedia as I have been driven away by an RFC that has made it impossible for me to continue here by poisoning the atmosphere in a way that I can never recover from.  I am asking them to ban me and I fervently hope they will for my own sake.  Good luck with your article. Warmest regards,  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I have already notified GAN that I have withdrawn from reviewing any articles. I am leaving Wikipedia as I have been driven away by an RFC that has made it impossible for me to continue here by poisoning the atmosphere in a way that I can never recover from.  I am asking them to ban me and I fervently hope they will for my own sake.  Good luck with your article. Warmest regards,  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 07:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
269067 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269062 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.231257360E09 +++$+++ Oh, OK. I didn't realize. I'll go ahead and proceed as I suggested above. Best wishes and thanks for your input on this as well as for contributing to the project. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::::::Oh, OK. I didn't realize. I'll go ahead and proceed as I suggested above. Best wishes and thanks for your input on this as well as for contributing to the project. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 07:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

531207 +++$+++ TheCatalyst31 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531207 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-23 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.287902580E09 +++$+++ I've thought about becoming an admin myself for a while; I think it would be helpful with new page patrol (and a few other things), and I think I have enough experience for it, but I wanted someone else to nominate me. If you're willing to nominate me, I accept your nomination; please draw up your nomination for me.  +++$+++ I've thought about becoming an admin myself for a while; I think it would be helpful with new page patrol (and a few other things), and I think I have enough experience for it, but I wanted someone else to nominate me. If you're willing to nominate me, I accept your nomination; please draw up your nomination for me. [[User:TheCatalyst31|TheCatalyst31]] <sup>[[User talk:TheCatalyst31|Reaction]]•[[Special:Contributions/TheCatalyst31|Creation]]</sup> 23:43, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
531208 +++$+++ TheCatalyst31 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531207 +++$+++ 531207 +++$+++ 2010-10-24 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.287985260E09 +++$+++ I have accepted your nomination, answered the initial questions, and transcluded the nomination; thank you again for nominating me.  +++$+++ :I have accepted your nomination, answered the initial questions, and transcluded the nomination; thank you again for nominating me. [[User:TheCatalyst31|TheCatalyst31]] <sup>[[User talk:TheCatalyst31|Reaction]]•[[Special:Contributions/TheCatalyst31|Creation]]</sup> 22:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

531209 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-26 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.288082280E09 +++$+++ I might have asked you this before, but do you believe the individual race articles are notable? I was reading through [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_NASCAR&oldid=109955237#Individual_Race_Pages this] discussion. Then, I said to myself, I'm still having people say the races are not notable. I'm wondering because before I retire from editing I'm wanting to know if my hard work was appreciated. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ I might have asked you this before, but do you believe the individual race articles are notable? I was reading through [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_NASCAR&oldid=109955237#Individual_Race_Pages this] discussion. Then, I said to myself, I'm still having people say the races are not notable. I'm wondering because before I retire from editing I'm wanting to know if my hard work was appreciated. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 01:38, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
531210 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531209 +++$+++ 531209 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.288082880E09 +++$+++ That was several years ago and things have changed a lot since then. As long as there is coverage in multiple independent reliable sources then it meets [[WP:NOTE]]. There are a lot of race articles in the major racing series, especially Formula One and the Indy 500. Your work is appreciated! I hope that you're not thinking about retiring any time soon! I was hoping that my current review of [[Alan Kulwicki]] would be the final straw before it gets nominated again for Featured Article - and I was hoping that you'd be willing to work with me on addressing the comments! Should I be concerned? '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :That was several years ago and things have changed a lot since then. As long as there is coverage in multiple independent reliable sources then it meets [[WP:NOTE]]. There are a lot of race articles in the major racing series, especially Formula One and the Indy 500. Your work is appreciated! I hope that you're not thinking about retiring any time soon! I was hoping that my current review of [[Alan Kulwicki]] would be the final straw before it gets nominated again for Featured Article - and I was hoping that you'd be willing to work with me on addressing the comments! Should I be concerned? '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
531211 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531209 +++$+++ 531210 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.288083540E09 +++$+++ No I'm not retiring any time soon (hopefully). I will help you on the Kulwicki article, and I better add it to my watchlist. If you see my number of edits decreasing ''a lot'' don't be concerned; I do have schooling seven hours during a day, then I have some real life things that I have to deal with to. Last, I added out todo template to the talk page template ([[:Template:WikiProject NASCAR]]), do you think we needed it on there? I looked at other projects, and most of them do have it. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ ::No I'm not retiring any time soon (hopefully). I will help you on the Kulwicki article, and I better add it to my watchlist. If you see my number of edits decreasing ''a lot'' don't be concerned; I do have schooling seven hours during a day, then I have some real life things that I have to deal with to. Last, I added out todo template to the talk page template ([[:Template:WikiProject NASCAR]]), do you think we needed it on there? I looked at other projects, and most of them do have it. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 01:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
531212 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531209 +++$+++ 531211 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.288089600E09 +++$+++ Phew, you had me worried! Real life definitely is more important, that's why I am not able to spend as much time here any more. I do like the To Do list addition to the template! I've noticed it on many other WikiProjects too. Yes, please add AK to your watchlist. I plan to give it another try before tackling any other major projects. I'm holding off on a DYK article that is nearly ready, plus I have about 340 images to upload. I'm planning to take several more trips to photograph the historic places in nearby counties before snow covers everything, so I have at most 1 month. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Phew, you had me worried! Real life definitely is more important, that's why I am not able to spend as much time here any more. I do like the To Do list addition to the template! I've noticed it on many other WikiProjects too. Yes, please add AK to your watchlist. I plan to give it another try before tackling any other major projects. I'm holding off on a DYK article that is nearly ready, plus I have about 340 images to upload. I'm planning to take several more trips to photograph the historic places in nearby counties before snow covers everything, so I have at most 1 month. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:40, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
531213 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531209 +++$+++ 531212 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.288112880E09 +++$+++ That is a lot of images that you have to upload. Also, I have added AK to my watchlist. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ ::::That is a lot of images that you have to upload. Also, I have added AK to my watchlist. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 10:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
531214 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531209 +++$+++ 531213 +++$+++ 2010-10-28 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.288252200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for all of your help in the past and present. If you havn't noticed look, I made [[:Category:Current Wikipedia birthdays|it]]! '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ :::::Thanks for all of your help in the past and present. If you havn't noticed look, I made [[:Category:Current Wikipedia birthdays|it]]! '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 00:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

6925 +++$+++ Mackan79 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-01 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.225533300E09 +++$+++ RonCram, you appear to be saying in various places that Khalidi has stated that he represented the PLO, when your source only says that he was an advisor for the \"Palestinian delegation,\" not the PLO, at the 1991 Madrid conference.  Is there something more to your claim?  If not, you should be aware that statements to this effect either in article space or on talk pages would violate the [[WP:BLP]] policy.  Please do clarify how you are supporting this claim if you stand by it, so that it can be resolved.  Regards,  +++$+++ RonCram, you appear to be saying in various places that Khalidi has stated that he represented the PLO, when your source only says that he was an advisor for the "Palestinian delegation," not the PLO, at the 1991 Madrid conference.  Is there something more to your claim?  If not, you should be aware that statements to this effect either in article space or on talk pages would violate the [[WP:BLP]] policy.  Please do clarify how you are supporting this claim if you stand by it, so that it can be resolved.  Regards, [[User:Mackan79|Mackan79]] ([[User talk:Mackan79|talk]]) 02:55, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
6926 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6925 +++$+++ 6925 +++$+++ 2008-11-01 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.225540620E09 +++$+++ If you read the source, Khalidi's book, it says that Khalidi was contacted by the PLO to find out if he would confirm his promise to be an advisor at the Madrid Conference.  The PLO officials had to give the names to Jim Baker soon.  Did you miss that?[http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=HbQJbOT5v4UC&pg=PR8&dq=rashid-khalidi+PLO+officials+Madrid+conference&ei=1q0LSfqxJJqktAPrhMjJBA] There really is no question he was representing the interests of the PLO during this time period.  +++$+++ :If you read the source, Khalidi's book, it says that Khalidi was contacted by the PLO to find out if he would confirm his promise to be an advisor at the Madrid Conference.  The PLO officials had to give the names to Jim Baker soon.  Did you miss that?[http://books.google.com/books?id=HbQJbOT5v4UC&pg=PR8&dq=rashid-khalidi+PLO+officials+Madrid+conference&ei=1q0LSfqxJJqktAPrhMjJBA] There really is no question he was representing the interests of the PLO during this time period. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 04:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
6927 +++$+++ Mackan79 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6925 +++$+++ 6926 +++$+++ 2008-11-01 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.225541580E09 +++$+++ I saw it, but surely you realize that isn't a statement that he was representing the PLO?  He states that they called him to confirm that he would be appearing at the conference, as he had previously stated that he would do.  His statement is at the same time clear that he was an advisor to the Palestinian delegation, not to the PLO.  It concerned me that this was the basis for your comments; if it is, please consider that [[WP:BLP]] does not allow comments of this nature that do not come directly from a [[WP:RS|reliable source]].  +++$+++ ::I saw it, but surely you realize that isn't a statement that he was representing the PLO?  He states that they called him to confirm that he would be appearing at the conference, as he had previously stated that he would do.  His statement is at the same time clear that he was an advisor to the Palestinian delegation, not to the PLO.  It concerned me that this was the basis for your comments; if it is, please consider that [[WP:BLP]] does not allow comments of this nature that do not come directly from a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. [[User:Mackan79|Mackan79]] ([[User talk:Mackan79|talk]]) 05:13, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
6928 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6925 +++$+++ 6927 +++$+++ 2008-11-01 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.225542060E09 +++$+++ Look, Khalidi would not have been there if not for [[Faisal Husseini|Faisal al-Husayni]], second only to Arafat in the PLO.  Husayni asked him to be there and then they called and confirmed.  Whose interests do you think Khalidi was representing? Of course this is a reliable source.  What more reliable source is there than the man himself?  If you think my interpretation is not correct, we can quote directly from the book and allow the readers to decide.  It makes no difference to me.  +++$+++ :::Look, Khalidi would not have been there if not for [[Faisal Husseini|Faisal al-Husayni]], second only to Arafat in the PLO.  Husayni asked him to be there and then they called and confirmed.  Whose interests do you think Khalidi was representing? Of course this is a reliable source.  What more reliable source is there than the man himself?  If you think my interpretation is not correct, we can quote directly from the book and allow the readers to decide.  It makes no difference to me. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 05:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

531215 +++$+++ Gtabigfan2010 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-31 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.288540620E09 +++$+++ Hi. I want to ask you few moments, why you remove one of the driver name added by [[User:Videogamer13|Videogamer13]] at other notable driver section on [[Championship Off-Road Racing]] page last month? -- +++$+++ Hi. I want to ask you few moments, why you remove one of the driver name added by [[User:Videogamer13|Videogamer13]] at other notable driver section on [[Championship Off-Road Racing]] page last month? --[[User:Gtabigfan2010|Gtabigfan2010]] ([[User talk:Gtabigfan2010|talk]]) 08:57, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
531216 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531215 +++$+++ 531215 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.288551780E09 +++$+++ I see now, after the fact, that Videogamer was permanently blocked for vandalism. That fact alone is enough to delete the content since edits by vandals should and frequently are undone. This content is not [[WP:VERIFY|verifiable]]. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I see now, after the fact, that Videogamer was permanently blocked for vandalism. That fact alone is enough to delete the content since edits by vandals should and frequently are undone. This content is not [[WP:VERIFY|verifiable]]. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 12:03, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

6929 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-01 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.225542660E09 +++$+++ Are you sure you want this rather than my short synopsis?  If so, that is fine with me.  But some might consider it undue [[WP:WEIGHT]]. +++$+++ Are you sure you want this rather than my short synopsis?  If so, that is fine with me.  But some might consider it undue [[WP:WEIGHT]].[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 05:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
6930 +++$+++ Mackan79 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6929 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-01 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.225543020E09 +++$+++ It's indeed the interpretation, not the reliability of this source.  Your insertion in his bio was that he \"wrote about his service to the PLO....\"  You said on the Barack Obama talk page that Khalidi \"admits he served the PLO as advisor....\"  These statements aren't supported by that source, which is why I raised the issue.  Is there something else here to quote?  If so, I'm not sure the point you would like to make.  It seems pretty clear that the Palestinian delegation had ties to the PLO; to say that Khalidi served the PLO, however, contradicts the source.  I'm unclear what else would need to be added, to either article.  I should add that this also strays into original [[WP:NOR|research]]\/[[WP:SYNTH|synthesis]], considering we are discussing a portion of a book that I do not believe has been connected to this issue by any other reliable source.  It would seem to me there are several problems here.   +++$+++ ::It's indeed the interpretation, not the reliability of this source.  Your insertion in his bio was that he "wrote about his service to the PLO...."  You said on the Barack Obama talk page that Khalidi "admits he served the PLO as advisor...."  These statements aren't supported by that source, which is why I raised the issue.  Is there something else here to quote?  If so, I'm not sure the point you would like to make.  It seems pretty clear that the Palestinian delegation had ties to the PLO; to say that Khalidi served the PLO, however, contradicts the source.  I'm unclear what else would need to be added, to either article.  I should add that this also strays into original [[WP:NOR|research]]/[[WP:SYNTH|synthesis]], considering we are discussing a portion of a book that I do not believe has been connected to this issue by any other reliable source.  It would seem to me there are several problems here.  [[User:Mackan79|Mackan79]] ([[User talk:Mackan79|talk]]) 05:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
6931 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6929 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-01 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.225545480E09 +++$+++ Okay, so you are fine with the reliability of the source. Good.  I think the book is quite clear that Khalidi was advising the Palestinians at the behest of the PLO.  If you do not like the way I re-stated the facts, that's fine.  We can go with quoting Khalidi.  What we cannot do is report to readers that Khalidi did not have ties to the PLO.  They asked him to do things and he agreed.  They called him at night and he took their call.  It is pretty obvious there were strong links between the PLO and Khalidi.  So, would you like to do the rewrite or would you like me to?  +++$+++ :::Okay, so you are fine with the reliability of the source. Good.  I think the book is quite clear that Khalidi was advising the Palestinians at the behest of the PLO.  If you do not like the way I re-stated the facts, that's fine.  We can go with quoting Khalidi.  What we cannot do is report to readers that Khalidi did not have ties to the PLO.  They asked him to do things and he agreed.  They called him at night and he took their call.  It is pretty obvious there were strong links between the PLO and Khalidi.  So, would you like to do the rewrite or would you like me to? [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 06:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
6932 +++$+++ Mackan79 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6929 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-01 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.225547400E09 +++$+++ If there's something you'd like to include, I'd suggest proposing it on the talk page for discussion.  I'll say that I disagree with your comments in any meaningful sense; I can only see your argument establishing that the Palestinian delegation itself had ties to the PLO, and accordingly that anyone involved with the Palestinian delegation would as well, which is the real issue as far as that goes.  But I don't see how it ties into the Obama or Khalidi bios, from the discussion above.  With whatever you would like to include, I can only suggest that you please be careful with regard to [[WP:BLP]].  +++$+++ ::::If there's something you'd like to include, I'd suggest proposing it on the talk page for discussion.  I'll say that I disagree with your comments in any meaningful sense; I can only see your argument establishing that the Palestinian delegation itself had ties to the PLO, and accordingly that anyone involved with the Palestinian delegation would as well, which is the real issue as far as that goes.  But I don't see how it ties into the Obama or Khalidi bios, from the discussion above.  With whatever you would like to include, I can only suggest that you please be careful with regard to [[WP:BLP]]. [[User:Mackan79|Mackan79]] ([[User talk:Mackan79|talk]]) 06:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

269075 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269075 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-07 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.231318320E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I am sorry that I argued with you at the RfC.  While I don't regret the sentiments behind my comments, placing them in that context was inappropriate of me, especially as you had made it clear that you felt the RfC tone was too combative already. It was certainly not my intention by participating in the RfC to make you feel attacked, and I regret if my recent posts there had that effect.  +++$+++ Mattisse, I am sorry that I argued with you at the RfC.  While I don't regret the sentiments behind my comments, placing them in that context was inappropriate of me, especially as you had made it clear that you felt the RfC tone was too combative already. It was certainly not my intention by participating in the RfC to make you feel attacked, and I regret if my recent posts there had that effect. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 00:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
269076 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269075 +++$+++ 269075 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.231342380E09 +++$+++ The RFC by the sock puppets [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Mattisse]] was far kinder. They at least were honest and up front.  Hatred disguised as pseudo-kindness and \"helpfulness\" is far more disgusting that honesty. I am repulsed by all this pretense at \"helping\" me. Actions speak louder than words, as they say. So they seek to strip me of all self respect  so I will come crawling back and be a workhorse again for FAC elite. No thanks.   &mdash; +++$+++ :The RFC by the sock puppets [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mattisse]] was far kinder. They at least were honest and up front.  Hatred disguised as pseudo-kindness and "helpfulness" is far more disgusting that honesty. I am repulsed by all this pretense at "helping" me. Actions speak louder than words, as they say. So they seek to strip me of all self respect  so I will come crawling back and be a workhorse again for FAC elite. No thanks.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 07:33, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
269077 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269075 +++$+++ 269076 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.231366500E09 +++$+++ I've looked at your contributions. You appear to be very dedicated to article improvement. Likewise, when I review FACs or write articles, I put forth a lot of effort. I think most FAC regulars do. I miss some stuff. I get easily distracted and leave reviews partially complete. My comments are garbled sometimes. I comment on the esoteric and abstract instead of the concrete. Rather than point out our faults, as you have made clear you do not wish to have done to you, would it not help everyone to acknowledge first the time and effort we volunteers put into this project? Then with the spirit of cooperation, look to improve the areas that need it? If you intend to stay and work on articles it can only benefit you, me, and everyone we both come across to concentrate on articles, acknowledge each other's work, and end this. Allow me then to be first: losing your efforts at article reviewing and improvement would be a loss to the entire project. -- +++$+++ ::I've looked at your contributions. You appear to be very dedicated to article improvement. Likewise, when I review FACs or write articles, I put forth a lot of effort. I think most FAC regulars do. I miss some stuff. I get easily distracted and leave reviews partially complete. My comments are garbled sometimes. I comment on the esoteric and abstract instead of the concrete. Rather than point out our faults, as you have made clear you do not wish to have done to you, would it not help everyone to acknowledge first the time and effort we volunteers put into this project? Then with the spirit of cooperation, look to improve the areas that need it? If you intend to stay and work on articles it can only benefit you, me, and everyone we both come across to concentrate on articles, acknowledge each other's work, and end this. Allow me then to be first: losing your efforts at article reviewing and improvement would be a loss to the entire project. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 14:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
269078 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269075 +++$+++ 269077 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.231382100E09 +++$+++ I deeply thank you, [[User:Moni3|Moni3]] for the above post. To answer you question about praise, it only came to mind reading the RFC. I don't seek praise, but when one editor, me, is singled out for slaughter, I tend to notice the disproportionality of treatment by the FAC delegate. The truth is that I don't have any trouble with FAC editors except the two who filed the RFC, Sandy and Casliber. That few of the others supported the RFC was heartwarming. I will remember to use edit summaries only very sparingly in the future, as that seems to be what ticked Sandy off the most. I also have learned that under no conditions may anything negative be said about FAC, that it is in the Sacred Cow category.  Most of the rest of the accusations did not make sense to me and seemed to prove nothing relevant to the present. For the record, I have nothing against you or any of he other FAC editors except the two that filed the RFC. Thank you for your thoughtful post. I appreciate that you took the time to actually read the RFC contents. I don't think most did, but rather assumed because there was an enormous mass of diffs, there must evil editor at the center. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::I deeply thank you, [[User:Moni3|Moni3]] for the above post. To answer you question about praise, it only came to mind reading the RFC. I don't seek praise, but when one editor, me, is singled out for slaughter, I tend to notice the disproportionality of treatment by the FAC delegate. The truth is that I don't have any trouble with FAC editors except the two who filed the RFC, Sandy and Casliber. That few of the others supported the RFC was heartwarming. I will remember to use edit summaries only very sparingly in the future, as that seems to be what ticked Sandy off the most. I also have learned that under no conditions may anything negative be said about FAC, that it is in the Sacred Cow category.  Most of the rest of the accusations did not make sense to me and seemed to prove nothing relevant to the present. For the record, I have nothing against you or any of he other FAC editors except the two that filed the RFC. Thank you for your thoughtful post. I appreciate that you took the time to actually read the RFC contents. I don't think most did, but rather assumed because there was an enormous mass of diffs, there must evil editor at the center. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:35, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
269079 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269075 +++$+++ 269078 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.231472520E09 +++$+++ If I may interject, I'm a little concerned at the conclusions you're drawing from the RfC. The problem was not the ''use'' of edit summaries, but their content. Similarly, it's not criticism of FAC ''per se'' that has caused such ill-feeling, but rather the means you have used in the past to present your criticism. A number of previously uninvolved editors have been distressed by the way you've pursued various grudges, and it seems harmfully reductive to cast this as more persecution by Sandy and Casliber.<p>The only \"accusation\" I would make is that you seem very quick to personalize disputes, and then you hold the ensuing grudges nearly indefinitely. Wikipedia is supposed to be fun, on some level - after all, none of us get paid to do this. You'll have more fun - and so will the rest of us - if you can just let some things go. Not every slight needs to be redressed. Not every dispute is the work of a \"bad guy\" and his or her minions. Not everyone needs to be dichotomized into \"ally\" or \"mortal enemy\" - some people are just colleagues. Not all critical feedback is an \"attack\". Not every adversary needs to be hounded to the [[Wikipedia:Editor review\/Cosmic Latte|ends of the earth]]. As the Buddha said, sometimes you've just got to let it go.<p>You obviously do a lot of good work here - that has been a recurring theme in the RfC comments. I'd like your interactions with your fellow editors to be smoother, for everyone's sake, but for that to happen I think it will be necessary to draw deeper conclusions from the RfC than those you've mentioned above. ''' +++$+++ ::::If I may interject, I'm a little concerned at the conclusions you're drawing from the RfC. The problem was not the ''use'' of edit summaries, but their content. Similarly, it's not criticism of FAC ''per se'' that has caused such ill-feeling, but rather the means you have used in the past to present your criticism. A number of previously uninvolved editors have been distressed by the way you've pursued various grudges, and it seems harmfully reductive to cast this as more persecution by Sandy and Casliber.<p>The only "accusation" I would make is that you seem very quick to personalize disputes, and then you hold the ensuing grudges nearly indefinitely. Wikipedia is supposed to be fun, on some level - after all, none of us get paid to do this. You'll have more fun - and so will the rest of us - if you can just let some things go. Not every slight needs to be redressed. Not every dispute is the work of a "bad guy" and his or her minions. Not everyone needs to be dichotomized into "ally" or "mortal enemy" - some people are just colleagues. Not all critical feedback is an "attack". Not every adversary needs to be hounded to the [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Cosmic Latte|ends of the earth]]. As the Buddha said, sometimes you've just got to let it go.<p>You obviously do a lot of good work here - that has been a recurring theme in the RfC comments. I'd like your interactions with your fellow editors to be smoother, for everyone's sake, but for that to happen I think it will be necessary to draw deeper conclusions from the RfC than those you've mentioned above. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 19:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
269080 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269075 +++$+++ 269079 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.231476600E09 +++$+++ I have read your points and will take them to heart. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I have read your points and will take them to heart. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
269081 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269075 +++$+++ 269080 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.231481160E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. Best wishes. ''' +++$+++ ::::::Fair enough. Best wishes. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 22:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

6933 +++$+++ Mackan79 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6933 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-01 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.225590120E09 +++$+++ Ron, the material you added is not ok.  You are taking a sentence out of a book of Khalidi's and blowing it into a paragraph at the outset of his bio in a way to make it appear contentious; you're also including original research, speaking of associations not mentioned in the source.  Please discuss material that you would like to add on the talk page before asking it.  If you continue adding material of this nature, and seeing the issues you have had on other pages relating to this material, I will have to ask that an administrator intervene.   +++$+++ Ron, the material you added is not ok.  You are taking a sentence out of a book of Khalidi's and blowing it into a paragraph at the outset of his bio in a way to make it appear contentious; you're also including original research, speaking of associations not mentioned in the source.  Please discuss material that you would like to add on the talk page before asking it.  If you continue adding material of this nature, and seeing the issues you have had on other pages relating to this material, I will have to ask that an administrator intervene.  [[User:Mackan79|Mackan79]] ([[User talk:Mackan79|talk]]) 18:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
6934 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6933 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-02 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.225680180E09 +++$+++ Don't do it.  That is a disruptive editor [[WP:CANVASS|canvassing]] over an edit war, on a [[WP:BLP]] matter.  If you do, you may well be blocked, likely long term given your edit history.   +++$+++ ::Don't do it.  That is a disruptive editor [[WP:CANVASS|canvassing]] over an edit war, on a [[WP:BLP]] matter.  If you do, you may well be blocked, likely long term given your edit history.  [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 18:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
6935 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6933 +++$+++ 6933 +++$+++ 2008-11-03 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.225776540E09 +++$+++ Historicist, stop making bogus accusations.  You are the one who violated 3RR to insert this BLP vio, and got blocked for it.  I have not violated 3RR, and am in fact at 1RR on the material.  Please do not edit tendentiously or canvass other editors to do so.  RonCram is skirting very close to a long term block for this, and you may be too.   +++$+++ :Historicist, stop making bogus accusations.  You are the one who violated 3RR to insert this BLP vio, and got blocked for it.  I have not violated 3RR, and am in fact at 1RR on the material.  Please do not edit tendentiously or canvass other editors to do so.  RonCram is skirting very close to a long term block for this, and you may be too.  [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 21:29, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

6936 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6936 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-04 08:31:00 +++$+++ 1.225816260E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.philocomp.net\/humanities\/dreams ...I told you so]. On a completely unrelated point (of course ;-): I hope that you'll be positively surprised by whoever is elected today. You're going to vote late, I assume, as a west-coaster? -- +++$+++ [http://www.philocomp.net/humanities/dreams ...I told you so]. On a completely unrelated point (of course ;-): I hope that you'll be positively surprised by whoever is elected today. You're going to vote late, I assume, as a west-coaster? --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 08:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
6937 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6936 +++$+++ 6936 +++$+++ 2008-11-05 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.225884180E09 +++$+++ Hey Stephan!  Yeah, I saw that already and found it unconvincing.  I have said all along that I am not a big fan of the quantitative approach to authorship analysis.  Evidence shows that an author will have different quantitative numbers based on the audience he is addressing.  Plus, I think it is possible for experts to use numbers to make any case they want to make depending on what evidence you bring forward.  Take a look at this one. [http:\/\/wnd.com\/files\/FictionFixer-Obama-Ayers-3.pdf] What was compelling to me and is still compelling is the use of peculiar vocabulary and imagery.  Unless Obama read lots of seafaring books that really changed his vocabulary, I cannot see him writing DFMF. Regarding the vote, I voted last week and mailed it in.  I knew I was going to be in meetings all day today.   Thank you for your kind thought of being positively surprised no matter who is elected.  As I write this, it doesn't look good for my candidate.  If Obama is elected and he governs like he campaigned and not as he voted as a Senator, then I will be positively surprised.  The good thing is that America is resilient.  Best wishes to you.  +++$+++ :Hey Stephan!  Yeah, I saw that already and found it unconvincing.  I have said all along that I am not a big fan of the quantitative approach to authorship analysis.  Evidence shows that an author will have different quantitative numbers based on the audience he is addressing.  Plus, I think it is possible for experts to use numbers to make any case they want to make depending on what evidence you bring forward.  Take a look at this one. [http://wnd.com/files/FictionFixer-Obama-Ayers-3.pdf] What was compelling to me and is still compelling is the use of peculiar vocabulary and imagery.  Unless Obama read lots of seafaring books that really changed his vocabulary, I cannot see him writing DFMF. Regarding the vote, I voted last week and mailed it in.  I knew I was going to be in meetings all day today.   Thank you for your kind thought of being positively surprised no matter who is elected.  As I write this, it doesn't look good for my candidate.  If Obama is elected and he governs like he campaigned and not as he voted as a Senator, then I will be positively surprised.  The good thing is that America is resilient.  Best wishes to you. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 03:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
6938 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6936 +++$+++ 6937 +++$+++ 2008-11-05 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.225916220E09 +++$+++ Anyways, the better candidate (although not necessarily the better man) has won. I'll wait and hope for the best. -- +++$+++ ::Anyways, the better candidate (although not necessarily the better man) has won. I'll wait and hope for the best. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 12:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

471599 +++$+++ CBM +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-22 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.187836380E09 +++$+++ I have noticed your calls for improving timeline articles, but I think that sort of article is very problematic for WP.  Making a good timeline requires being very selective about which things are included and which are not included, i.e., using editorial discretion.  The way WP is written makes it very hard to prevent lists and timelines from becoming filled with trivia. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>( +++$+++ I have noticed your calls for improving timeline articles, but I think that sort of article is very problematic for WP.  Making a good timeline requires being very selective about which things are included and which are not included, i.e., using editorial discretion.  The way WP is written makes it very hard to prevent lists and timelines from becoming filled with trivia. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 19:33, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
471600 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471599 +++$+++ 471599 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.187836560E09 +++$+++ OK. Thanks for the response. I'll try and find a good example. In my opinion, they are no more problematic to keep under control than other types of lists, and in many ways are easier, mainly in that the verification of the date often provides a good source for the entry.  +++$+++ :OK. Thanks for the response. I'll try and find a good example. In my opinion, they are no more problematic to keep under control than other types of lists, and in many ways are easier, mainly in that the verification of the date often provides a good source for the entry. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 19:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

269082 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-08 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.231460940E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to leave a little note. When I say I do not \"like\" you, I do not mean (in turn) that I dislike you. It takes a lot for me to be close with an individual, and bonds of friendship mean dearly to me. However, even basic humanity causes me to feel sympathy with and be concerned for others. There are very few that I do not like, and even they I would seek to be treated in a fitting manner. I am blunt and I air my mind. However, I hold no grudges. My email is always open if you feel that you need to talk about a topic. I always welcome conversation, no matter how unpleasant the topic may be.  +++$+++ I just wanted to leave a little note. When I say I do not "like" you, I do not mean (in turn) that I dislike you. It takes a lot for me to be close with an individual, and bonds of friendship mean dearly to me. However, even basic humanity causes me to feel sympathy with and be concerned for others. There are very few that I do not like, and even they I would seek to be treated in a fitting manner. I am blunt and I air my mind. However, I hold no grudges. My email is always open if you feel that you need to talk about a topic. I always welcome conversation, no matter how unpleasant the topic may be. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 16:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
269083 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269082 +++$+++ 269082 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.231464060E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Ottava. I have noticed and been very impressed with  your quality of airing your mind but holding no grudges. I have seen you get put down, sometimes rather brutally, and watched you get up,  carry on and recover with that person, bearing no malice. Please feel free to interject your opinion in any situation I happen to be embroiled in, as I would appreciate your advice. You are definitely a distinctive person and seem free of the concerns with pride of self that preoccupy many of us. I am not very comfortable with email on Wikipedia and only periodically have it enabled. I much rather just be public, however foolish I may appear. But perhaps I should reconsider that position. I definitely need to get helpful, constructive  input from others. May be email contact with you would help, as frankly the RFC was confusing and I was able to draw only a few main points from the massive number of diffs meant to show me my failings. So please, I welcome any clarification you can provide.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you, Ottava. I have noticed and been very impressed with  your quality of airing your mind but holding no grudges. I have seen you get put down, sometimes rather brutally, and watched you get up,  carry on and recover with that person, bearing no malice. Please feel free to interject your opinion in any situation I happen to be embroiled in, as I would appreciate your advice. You are definitely a distinctive person and seem free of the concerns with pride of self that preoccupy many of us. I am not very comfortable with email on Wikipedia and only periodically have it enabled. I much rather just be public, however foolish I may appear. But perhaps I should reconsider that position. I definitely need to get helpful, constructive  input from others. May be email contact with you would help, as frankly the RFC was confusing and I was able to draw only a few main points from the massive number of diffs meant to show me my failings. So please, I welcome any clarification you can provide.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
269084 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269082 +++$+++ 269083 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.231477080E09 +++$+++ I offer email access not to encourage deception, but to allow people to voice their concerns without fear of others taking it the wrong way or just to vent. I don't reveal contents of email to anyone else unless given permission, nor do I really ask anyone to do anything but look and comment via email. I believe that the main priority, or the main desire, of people in difficult situations is to be heard and to be consulted with. Feeling neglected can do a lot of damage psychologically and only encourages problems. As long as I am able to, I will make sure that everyone has the ability to talk to me so that they do not feel neglected or as if no one is willing to listen.  +++$+++ ::I offer email access not to encourage deception, but to allow people to voice their concerns without fear of others taking it the wrong way or just to vent. I don't reveal contents of email to anyone else unless given permission, nor do I really ask anyone to do anything but look and comment via email. I believe that the main priority, or the main desire, of people in difficult situations is to be heard and to be consulted with. Feeling neglected can do a lot of damage psychologically and only encourages problems. As long as I am able to, I will make sure that everyone has the ability to talk to me so that they do not feel neglected or as if no one is willing to listen. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 20:58, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

531228 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-13 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.289715360E09 +++$+++ I prepared to help you with the article, and I thought you would have nominated it by now. So are you still planning to do it? '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ I prepared to help you with the article, and I thought you would have nominated it by now. So are you still planning to do it? '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 22:16, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
531229 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531228 +++$+++ 531228 +++$+++ 2010-11-13 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.289716260E09 +++$+++ [[WP:BUSY]]...  +++$+++ :[[WP:BUSY]]... [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 22:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
531230 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531228 +++$+++ 531229 +++$+++ 2010-11-13 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.289716560E09 +++$+++ He (I thought) was supposed to contact me once I finished with my vacation, which was the 3rd. I just wondering when he was planning to do it. Ummmm, since I was supposed to help him, I can't be curious to when he wants to do it? '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ ::He (I thought) was supposed to contact me once I finished with my vacation, which was the 3rd. I just wondering when he was planning to do it. Ummmm, since I was supposed to help him, I can't be curious to when he wants to do it? '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 22:36, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
531231 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531228 +++$+++ 531230 +++$+++ 2010-11-13 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.289717220E09 +++$+++ It's a fair question, and the answer wasn't WP:BUSY. There's a huge bitchfest that has been deeply troubled me complaining about everyone who has done a lot of DYK articles like me. It claims that we are all plagiarists or at least [[Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing|close paraphrasers]]. I can't find the discussion at [[WP:AIV]] but check out [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]] if you want to see the effects. So I've started uploading the hundreds of images that I need to do this winter. I don't have the guts to propose AK at FAC since the FAC head is the one doing the bitching and name calling. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::It's a fair question, and the answer wasn't WP:BUSY. There's a huge bitchfest that has been deeply troubled me complaining about everyone who has done a lot of DYK articles like me. It claims that we are all plagiarists or at least [[Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing|close paraphrasers]]. I can't find the discussion at [[WP:AIV]] but check out [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]] if you want to see the effects. So I've started uploading the hundreds of images that I need to do this winter. I don't have the guts to propose AK at FAC since the FAC head is the one doing the bitching and name calling. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 22:47, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
531232 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531228 +++$+++ 531231 +++$+++ 2010-11-13 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.289719740E09 +++$+++ Oh, well hope it ends soon. So you and the project can get their first FA article. I would like your opinion on this [[2010 Sylvania 300|article]], if your willing to give me some advice. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ ::::Oh, well hope it ends soon. So you and the project can get their first FA article. I would like your opinion on this [[2010 Sylvania 300|article]], if your willing to give me some advice. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 23:29, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
531233 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531228 +++$+++ 531231 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.289728020E09 +++$+++ Also, I discovered a new [[The Economics and Global Expansion of NASCAR|article]]. It was protested to be merged in 2008, and the template is still on the article. What do you think we (NASCAR wikiproject) should do with the article? Move it to NASCAR, or keep it alone and put it in the scope of NASCAR, by adding the main template? Its most recent edit was on September 9, 2009. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ ::::Also, I discovered a new [[The Economics and Global Expansion of NASCAR|article]]. It was protested to be merged in 2008, and the template is still on the article. What do you think we (NASCAR wikiproject) should do with the article? Move it to NASCAR, or keep it alone and put it in the scope of NASCAR, by adding the main template? Its most recent edit was on September 9, 2009. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 01:47, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
531234 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531228 +++$+++ 531233 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.289741220E09 +++$+++ I saw a huge ANI thread about it about 2 weeks ago; I hope it settles soon and won't discourage too many. If you're curious, here is a link: [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents\/Plagiarism and copyright concerns on the main page]]. As for the article you mentioned, [[The Economics and Global Expansion of NASCAR]], it looks like a very good candidate for a merger into the main [[NASCAR]] article. Its scope fits well in the main structure of the main article, and I think it would be a helpful addition.  +++$+++ :::::I saw a huge ANI thread about it about 2 weeks ago; I hope it settles soon and won't discourage too many. If you're curious, here is a link: [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Plagiarism and copyright concerns on the main page]]. As for the article you mentioned, [[The Economics and Global Expansion of NASCAR]], it looks like a very good candidate for a merger into the main [[NASCAR]] article. Its scope fits well in the main structure of the main article, and I think it would be a helpful addition. [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 05:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
531235 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531228 +++$+++ 531234 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.289746860E09 +++$+++ Discouraged is a good way to describe my feelings on the situation right now. One of the best admin helpers at DYK quit because of the situation, which has compounded the backlog problems. Kulwicki's article already failed once at FAC, which makes me even more apprehensive. Merging appears to be consensus, so you can do a non-admin closure. No admin powers are needed for this merge. I'm fine with merging content into the NASCAR article, so you can do it whenever. You should leave the article as a redirect to the NASCAR article and make sure that the edit summary for the merge includes a comment that it's a merge and a wikilink to which article it is a merge from. I'd leave the merge request on the talk page and remove the WP:NASCAR template. Thanks for finding the link to the discussion; I searched for almost 1\/2 hour. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::Discouraged is a good way to describe my feelings on the situation right now. One of the best admin helpers at DYK quit because of the situation, which has compounded the backlog problems. Kulwicki's article already failed once at FAC, which makes me even more apprehensive. Merging appears to be consensus, so you can do a non-admin closure. No admin powers are needed for this merge. I'm fine with merging content into the NASCAR article, so you can do it whenever. You should leave the article as a redirect to the NASCAR article and make sure that the edit summary for the merge includes a comment that it's a merge and a wikilink to which article it is a merge from. I'd leave the merge request on the talk page and remove the WP:NASCAR template. Thanks for finding the link to the discussion; I searched for almost 1/2 hour. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 07:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

269085 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269085 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-08 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.231480020E09 +++$+++ One thing you need to stop doing Mattisse, is sending insulting emails to those with whom you have chosen to fall out, in which you repeat your allegations of cabalism and favouritism, and even extend it to accuse disinterested third-parties who have only your best interests at heart as having organised cliques against you. The email you sent me only a few days ago displayed a state of mind that cannot be comfortable for you to have to live with. I will not make that email public, but you may choose to do so if you wish. -- +++$+++ One thing you need to stop doing Mattisse, is sending insulting emails to those with whom you have chosen to fall out, in which you repeat your allegations of cabalism and favouritism, and even extend it to accuse disinterested third-parties who have only your best interests at heart as having organised cliques against you. The email you sent me only a few days ago displayed a state of mind that cannot be comfortable for you to have to live with. I will not make that email public, but you may choose to do so if you wish. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 21:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
269086 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269085 +++$+++ 269085 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.231483200E09 +++$+++ I have been intending to post a thank you note on your page today. But I guess that would not be a very good idea now. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I have been intending to post a thank you note on your page today. But I guess that would not be a very good idea now. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
269087 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269085 +++$+++ 269086 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.231484760E09 +++$+++ I am not in the slightest angry Mattisse; I just want to see an end to this pattern of distrust and paranoia, that's all. There are no cliques, or at least if there are then nobody's yet invited me to join one. We're all on the same side, each doing what little we can to make the sum of human knowledge freely available to everyone. We need to be looking up at the stars, not down in the gutter. -- +++$+++ ::I am not in the slightest angry Mattisse; I just want to see an end to this pattern of distrust and paranoia, that's all. There are no cliques, or at least if there are then nobody's yet invited me to join one. We're all on the same side, each doing what little we can to make the sum of human knowledge freely available to everyone. We need to be looking up at the stars, not down in the gutter. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
269088 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269085 +++$+++ 269087 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.231486500E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I hope you don't mind my posting again.  I am really heartened by your comments today, and I hope that you've taken the constructive criticism to heart.  The general consensus appears to be that we are all really serious about wanting you to continue to contribute (to articles, to FAC, and to other processes); we'd just like the tone to be a little more civil and assume a little more good faith.  Good luck!!  +++$+++ :::Mattisse, I hope you don't mind my posting again.  I am really heartened by your comments today, and I hope that you've taken the constructive criticism to heart.  The general consensus appears to be that we are all really serious about wanting you to continue to contribute (to articles, to FAC, and to other processes); we'd just like the tone to be a little more civil and assume a little more good faith.  Good luck!! [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 23:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
269089 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269085 +++$+++ 269088 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.231487460E09 +++$+++ I welcome your post and am extremely heartened by all the helpful responses to the RFC, the specific remarks and the constructive attitudes of those commenting. For quite a while I have been feeling like the ugly duckling at FAC and that I was forcing my presence on those who wished me gone. I have taken the constructive criticism to heart. I feel like there is a wiki community and that I can be a part. I appreciate your continuing responses in the face of my rudeness. I have always had a high opinion of you and thank you for persisting in getting your message through to me. Thank you so very much. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I welcome your post and am extremely heartened by all the helpful responses to the RFC, the specific remarks and the constructive attitudes of those commenting. For quite a while I have been feeling like the ugly duckling at FAC and that I was forcing my presence on those who wished me gone. I have taken the constructive criticism to heart. I feel like there is a wiki community and that I can be a part. I appreciate your continuing responses in the face of my rudeness. I have always had a high opinion of you and thank you for persisting in getting your message through to me. Thank you so very much. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

6943 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6943 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-16 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.268734920E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}<\/code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> -  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 03:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
6944 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6943 +++$+++ 6943 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.268739900E09 +++$+++ 90 days? Nope. You're just hoping I will go away. I'll give you the five days that a {{tl|prod}} would last, and if I don't see evidence that he meets [[WP:PROF]], I'll take it to AfD. If he's truly notable, you don't need 90 days to prove your case. -  +++$+++ :90 days? Nope. You're just hoping I will go away. I'll give you the five days that a {{tl|prod}} would last, and if I don't see evidence that he meets [[WP:PROF]], I'll take it to AfD. If he's truly notable, you don't need 90 days to prove your case. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 04:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
6945 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6943 +++$+++ 6944 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.268741880E09 +++$+++ Five days to write a paragraph? Then you're bloody slow. Here's the deal: I believe you're promoting this guy for some reason. You keep saying this stuff about \"some people\" saying he's Nobel material. Who are these \"some people\"? I'm a reporter, so I'm skeptical. If you're going to make that statement, you have to prove it with reliable sources. It's a lot like a research paper \u2014 if you pull some statement out of thin air and don't give anything by which to verify it, the professor's gonna come down on you. As for the \"hurry\": it is a common tactic at Wikipedia to say, \"Give it more time\" or \"Let some others make this better\" or some such, when the original author really doesn't have an article with solid footing. The hope is that the editor who flags the article for deletion will forget about it and article will slip through the cracks. Well, I don't fall for that tactic. If he is really notable, you can find something (and it doesn't really take that much, if it's there) to show it within the normal five-day time frame of a {{tl|prod}}. If you can't then we go to AfD, in which case you have another five days. If this guy really is Nobel material, it won't take you five days to find something. So get to it. (By the way, my position is not ideologically driven. I'm also a global-warming skeptic.) -  +++$+++ ::Five days to write a paragraph? Then you're bloody slow. Here's the deal: I believe you're promoting this guy for some reason. You keep saying this stuff about "some people" saying he's Nobel material. Who are these "some people"? I'm a reporter, so I'm skeptical. If you're going to make that statement, you have to prove it with reliable sources. It's a lot like a research paper — if you pull some statement out of thin air and don't give anything by which to verify it, the professor's gonna come down on you. As for the "hurry": it is a common tactic at Wikipedia to say, "Give it more time" or "Let some others make this better" or some such, when the original author really doesn't have an article with solid footing. The hope is that the editor who flags the article for deletion will forget about it and article will slip through the cracks. Well, I don't fall for that tactic. If he is really notable, you can find something (and it doesn't really take that much, if it's there) to show it within the normal five-day time frame of a {{tl|prod}}. If you can't then we go to AfD, in which case you have another five days. If this guy really is Nobel material, it won't take you five days to find something. So get to it. (By the way, my position is not ideologically driven. I'm also a global-warming skeptic.) - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 05:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
6946 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6943 +++$+++ 6945 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.268751480E09 +++$+++ Your arguments can best be summed up as, \"He's too young to be notable now, but he might be someday.\" Well, that just won't cut it. Wikipedia's notability policy toward academics favors older academics because they are more likely to have accomplished notable things in their careers. Your Babelfish suggestion is just plain silly \u2014 you expect viewers to click on the link, then drag it over to Babelfish? Yeah, right. As for setting a reminder in my Outlook \u2014 well, I can't stand Outlook. How's about you come up with some references over the next five days instead? It's not that hard if he's really notable. I assumed good faith at first, but your arguments are like so many I've heard from those trying to justify a lack of notability, so the assumption is now dispensed with. Your time would be better spent coming up with references instead of excuses. -  +++$+++ :::Your arguments can best be summed up as, "He's too young to be notable now, but he might be someday." Well, that just won't cut it. Wikipedia's notability policy toward academics favors older academics because they are more likely to have accomplished notable things in their careers. Your Babelfish suggestion is just plain silly — you expect viewers to click on the link, then drag it over to Babelfish? Yeah, right. As for setting a reminder in my Outlook — well, I can't stand Outlook. How's about you come up with some references over the next five days instead? It's not that hard if he's really notable. I assumed good faith at first, but your arguments are like so many I've heard from those trying to justify a lack of notability, so the assumption is now dispensed with. Your time would be better spent coming up with references instead of excuses. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 07:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
6947 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6943 +++$+++ 6946 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.268774040E09 +++$+++ Janitor? Yes, it's called [[WP:NPP|new-page patrol]]. Been doing it a long time, so I've seen a lot of arguments just like yours. Clock's ticking. Get to work. -  +++$+++ ::::Janitor? Yes, it's called [[WP:NPP|new-page patrol]]. Been doing it a long time, so I've seen a lot of arguments just like yours. Clock's ticking. Get to work. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 14:14, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
6948 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6943 +++$+++ 6947 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.268778360E09 +++$+++ And your incessant complaining is not helping you build this article. I haven't seen this much whining on Wikipedia in a long time. As for my \"reputation within the community,\" I think I've been around long enough that it is pretty well set, and I'm not really concerned. You remind me of a popular phrase: \"Methinks he doth protest too much.\" -  +++$+++ :::::And your incessant complaining is not helping you build this article. I haven't seen this much whining on Wikipedia in a long time. As for my "reputation within the community," I think I've been around long enough that it is pretty well set, and I'm not really concerned. You remind me of a popular phrase: "Methinks he doth protest too much." - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 15:26, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

269090 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-09 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.231545060E09 +++$+++ I think we kind of got off on the wrong foot at [[Wikipedia talk:Footnotes]]. I appreciate the work you did on Sano, but I hope you understand that you weren't alone. Tintor2 and I also did the best we could've before having that copy-edit request made. Well, that's about it. Now [[Trunks (Dragon Ball)]] is another page I have my eyes on, though there isn't much I can do there. Do you think you'll have time to fix up that one too?  +++$+++ I think we kind of got off on the wrong foot at [[Wikipedia talk:Footnotes]]. I appreciate the work you did on Sano, but I hope you understand that you weren't alone. Tintor2 and I also did the best we could've before having that copy-edit request made. Well, that's about it. Now [[Trunks (Dragon Ball)]] is another page I have my eyes on, though there isn't much I can do there. Do you think you'll have time to fix up that one too? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 15:51, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
269091 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269090 +++$+++ 269090 +++$+++ 2009-01-09 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.231548720E09 +++$+++ It would be wonderful to start over with you. I do not hold anything against you. My problem was that the minor incident between us, for which I hold nothing against you, was used in and RFC against me [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Mattisse 3]] as one of many incidents totally blown out of proportion to show how horrible I am. Thanks so much  for the note to me. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :It would be wonderful to start over with you. I do not hold anything against you. My problem was that the minor incident between us, for which I hold nothing against you, was used in and RFC against me [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mattisse 3]] as one of many incidents totally blown out of proportion to show how horrible I am. Thanks so much  for the note to me. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
269092 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269090 +++$+++ 269091 +++$+++ 2009-01-09 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.231549860E09 +++$+++ Oh, sorry about that. Guess now that that's over with, I'd like to know if you can perform a major copy-edit on Trunks' article. It would ''really'' make a difference.  +++$+++ ::Oh, sorry about that. Guess now that that's over with, I'd like to know if you can perform a major copy-edit on Trunks' article. It would ''really'' make a difference. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 17:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
269093 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269090 +++$+++ 269091 +++$+++ 2009-01-09 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.231550040E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, please understand that the RfC was not meant to show that you are \"horrible\" (I personally would consign murders\/rapists to the \"horrible\" category and few others); it was merely meant to illustrate that some of your comments and\/or actions might have been inappropriate. It should not, and indeed cannot, be taken as a reflection on your character or you as a person, since I would suspect very few Wikipedians know you personally.  We're only qualified to discuss the impact your actions have had on us.  +++$+++ ::Mattisse, please understand that the RfC was not meant to show that you are "horrible" (I personally would consign murders/rapists to the "horrible" category and few others); it was merely meant to illustrate that some of your comments and/or actions might have been inappropriate. It should not, and indeed cannot, be taken as a reflection on your character or you as a person, since I would suspect very few Wikipedians know you personally.  We're only qualified to discuss the impact your actions have had on us. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 17:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
269094 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269090 +++$+++ 269093 +++$+++ 2009-01-09 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.231553280E09 +++$+++ Karanacs, if the RFC were not meant to show that I am a horrible person, then the diffs would not have started 20 days after my first edit in May 2006, would not have included the sock puppet allegations which [[User:Salix alba]] and others said two years ago that the sock puppet issue should not be used as an albatross around my neck, would not have included very minor issues that had nothing to do with FAC, or anyone involved with FAC, would not have included allegations of me stirring up trouble at GAN\/GAR when that only happened when SandyGeorgia entered into a situation to defend someone after I was already involved, would not have included allegations about [[Che Guevara]] article which the major neutral editor there [[User:Coppertwig]] denied, would not have included misleading and incorrect information like the link about ALL CAPS in article inline notes which some editors liked (eg Casliber, as I recall) and other did not, etc, etc. If the RFC had meant to be helpful, it would have included relevant and recent diffs specifically pointing to the problems. As it was, I could not even make my way through all those diffs, only getting through about half before realizing the tenor was petty and unconstructive.  I do not blame you or most others who participate. Almost everyone gave me praise as well as pointing out faults. Except on editor. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Karanacs, if the RFC were not meant to show that I am a horrible person, then the diffs would not have started 20 days after my first edit in May 2006, would not have included the sock puppet allegations which [[User:Salix alba]] and others said two years ago that the sock puppet issue should not be used as an albatross around my neck, would not have included very minor issues that had nothing to do with FAC, or anyone involved with FAC, would not have included allegations of me stirring up trouble at GAN/GAR when that only happened when SandyGeorgia entered into a situation to defend someone after I was already involved, would not have included allegations about [[Che Guevara]] article which the major neutral editor there [[User:Coppertwig]] denied, would not have included misleading and incorrect information like the link about ALL CAPS in article inline notes which some editors liked (eg Casliber, as I recall) and other did not, etc, etc. If the RFC had meant to be helpful, it would have included relevant and recent diffs specifically pointing to the problems. As it was, I could not even make my way through all those diffs, only getting through about half before realizing the tenor was petty and unconstructive.  I do not blame you or most others who participate. Almost everyone gave me praise as well as pointing out faults. Except on editor. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
269095 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269090 +++$+++ 269094 +++$+++ 2009-01-09 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.231555560E09 +++$+++ It is, unfortunately, recommended that all RfCs include a link to any previous RfCs that involved the same editor.  The inclusion of those links is standard practice, and not something meant to specifically draw attention to those incidents or to make you feel as if you were being hounded for mistakes\/disputes far in the past. Their inclusion is also not meant to imply that fault was found with the editor named.   +++$+++ ::::It is, unfortunately, recommended that all RfCs include a link to any previous RfCs that involved the same editor.  The inclusion of those links is standard practice, and not something meant to specifically draw attention to those incidents or to make you feel as if you were being hounded for mistakes/disputes far in the past. Their inclusion is also not meant to imply that fault was found with the editor named.  [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 18:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

531236 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-14 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.289775900E09 +++$+++ {{od}}I'll merge it into the article later today. As for the discouraging situation, I was discouraged on Wikinews, and I almost left for good. They too have been talking about plagiarism. Also, I believe one user that helped me on the templates left because of discouargement when he was going to the update the table, and made several mistakes by undoing some of the edits. He currently has a short wikibreak template on his talk page, but it has been since September. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ {{od}}I'll merge it into the article later today. As for the discouraging situation, I was discouraged on Wikinews, and I almost left for good. They too have been talking about plagiarism. Also, I believe one user that helped me on the templates left because of discouargement when he was going to the update the table, and made several mistakes by undoing some of the edits. He currently has a short wikibreak template on his talk page, but it has been since September. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 15:05, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
531237 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531236 +++$+++ 531236 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.289807400E09 +++$+++ Discouraged but definitely not near quitting. My skin is way too thick than to let one or even a bunch of people get me that upset. There's so many things to do here; it's easy to find something else if an area would bother me, especially being able to do some of the more mundane admin tasks. I've created so much article content \/ images and I need to make sure it doesn't get wrecked by vandals! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Discouraged but definitely not near quitting. My skin is way too thick than to let one or even a bunch of people get me that upset. There's so many things to do here; it's easy to find something else if an area would bother me, especially being able to do some of the more mundane admin tasks. I've created so much article content / images and I need to make sure it doesn't get wrecked by vandals! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

531239 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531239 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-14 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.289786640E09 +++$+++ I like the article about the Larson Brothers Airport. Excellent. I agree it deserves a DYK! Thank you- +++$+++ I like the article about the Larson Brothers Airport. Excellent. I agree it deserves a DYK! Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 18:04, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
531240 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531239 +++$+++ 531239 +++$+++ 2010-11-15 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.289808000E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I figured you'd enjoy this article, especially since you came from the area! I photographed it 1 week ago today and I had to write a stub since I had so many images. So I just kept finding things to write. Please expand it if you can. I bet you noticed the pattern of my route with all of the article that I added pictures to. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Thank you! I figured you'd enjoy this article, especially since you came from the area! I photographed it 1 week ago today and I had to write a stub since I had so many images. So I just kept finding things to write. Please expand it if you can. I bet you noticed the pattern of my route with all of the article that I added pictures to. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:00, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

6952 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-15 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.292477340E09 +++$+++ Hi Ron. Take a look at [http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/content\/330\/6010\/1523.short this new paper] on cloud feedback. What do you think? -- +++$+++ Hi Ron. Take a look at [http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6010/1523.short this new paper] on cloud feedback. What do you think? --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 21:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
6953 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6952 +++$+++ 6952 +++$+++ 2010-12-15 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.292480040E09 +++$+++ It looks like an interesting approach to the problem.  I cannot imagine the more alarmist folks like the paper much.  They need a large positive feedback from clouds to get to the 6C level for climate sensitivity.  Ten years is not much data.  Surely the data goes back further, perhaps as far as 1979.  You know the saying.  \"It isn't science until someone replicates it.\"  Let's see how it survives on the battlefield of science. +++$+++ :It looks like an interesting approach to the problem.  I cannot imagine the more alarmist folks like the paper much.  They need a large positive feedback from clouds to get to the 6C level for climate sensitivity.  Ten years is not much data.  Surely the data goes back further, perhaps as far as 1979.  You know the saying.  "It isn't science until someone replicates it."  Let's see how it survives on the battlefield of science.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 22:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
6954 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6952 +++$+++ 6953 +++$+++ 2010-12-15 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.292480400E09 +++$+++ Hmmm. 6\xb0C is outside the mainstream range, which is 2-4.5\xb0C. Either the IPCC is not \"more alarmist\", or you don't know what the IPCC says.  -- +++$+++ ::Hmmm. 6°C is outside the mainstream range, which is 2-4.5°C. Either the IPCC is not "more alarmist", or you don't know what the IPCC says.  --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 22:20, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
6955 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6952 +++$+++ 6954 +++$+++ 2010-12-16 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.292566200E09 +++$+++ I said \"more alarmist,\" not referring to the IPCC.  The IPCC is alarmist, but not as alarmist as Jim Hansen or Joe Romm.  +++$+++ :::I said "more alarmist," not referring to the IPCC.  The IPCC is alarmist, but not as alarmist as Jim Hansen or Joe Romm. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 22:10, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
6956 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6952 +++$+++ 6955 +++$+++ 2010-12-16 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.292568300E09 +++$+++ Well, the latest paper by Hansen I could find discussed median climate sensitivity of 3\xb0C and considered the range from 1.7-4.2\xb0C, slightly below IPCC predictions. [http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/content\/316\/5825\/709.full]. -- +++$+++ ::::Well, the latest paper by Hansen I could find discussed median climate sensitivity of 3°C and considered the range from 1.7-4.2°C, slightly below IPCC predictions. [http://www.sciencemag.org/content/316/5825/709.full]. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 22:45, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
6957 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6952 +++$+++ 6956 +++$+++ 2010-12-17 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.292583960E09 +++$+++ I don't know, Stephan.  The abstract says \"The data available for the period since 1990 raise concerns that the climate system, in particular sea level, may be responding more quickly to climate change than our current generation of models indicates.\"  It's the \"It's worse than we thought!\" meme.  The paper is behind a pay wall so I haven't read the whole thing, but it sounds pretty alarmist to me.  Romm holds to climate sensitivity at 10C or 12C, way off the charts. +++$+++ :::::I don't know, Stephan.  The abstract says "The data available for the period since 1990 raise concerns that the climate system, in particular sea level, may be responding more quickly to climate change than our current generation of models indicates."  It's the "It's worse than we thought!" meme.  The paper is behind a pay wall so I haven't read the whole thing, but it sounds pretty alarmist to me.  Romm holds to climate sensitivity at 10C or 12C, way off the charts.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 03:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
6958 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6952 +++$+++ 6957 +++$+++ 2010-12-17 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.292603400E09 +++$+++ Access to the paper is free if you register (freely). I don't do that often, but for the AAAS it was very well worth it. You get access to all [[Science (journal)]] papers older than one year. And please don't shift goal posts. We were talking about climate sensitivity. I don't know Romm - Google Scholar returns several likely hits, but all on topics related to the Hydrogen economy, not on climate change. -- +++$+++ ::::::Access to the paper is free if you register (freely). I don't do that often, but for the AAAS it was very well worth it. You get access to all [[Science (journal)]] papers older than one year. And please don't shift goal posts. We were talking about climate sensitivity. I don't know Romm - Google Scholar returns several likely hits, but all on topics related to the Hydrogen economy, not on climate change. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 08:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

567619 +++$+++ MER-C +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-22 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.187803200E09 +++$+++ I have just the solution for you... [[MediaWiki:Usernameblacklist]].  +++$+++ I have just the solution for you... [[MediaWiki:Usernameblacklist]]. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 10:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
567620 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567619 +++$+++ 567619 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.187825520E09 +++$+++ I can't edit the Username Blacklist. It is fully protected.  +++$+++ :I can't edit the Username Blacklist. It is fully protected. [[User:NHRHS2010|<font color="red" face="papyrus">'''NHRHS2010'''</font>]][[User talk:NHRHS2010|<sup><small><font color= "black">''' Talk '''</font></small></sup>]] 16:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

269099 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269099 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-09 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.231552200E09 +++$+++ I dont want to bother, but the Trunks article still needs some work before a copy-edit. The article needs some thing such as fixing and adding refs. +++$+++ I dont want to bother, but the Trunks article still needs some work before a copy-edit. The article needs some thing such as fixing and adding refs.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 17:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
269100 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269099 +++$+++ 269099 +++$+++ 2009-01-09 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.231552620E09 +++$+++ Let me know what you want me to do. I can start now or I can wait until you are ready. How close to ready are you? &mdash; +++$+++ :Let me know what you want me to do. I can start now or I can wait until you are ready. How close to ready are you? &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
269101 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269099 +++$+++ 269100 +++$+++ 2009-01-09 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.231554720E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I personally feel some of your copy-editing skills could prep the article first. It would certainly help me look over a few things. [[User:Sarujo]] will take of the refs later, as we've been discussing on his talk page. Your response?  +++$+++ ::Mattisse, I personally feel some of your copy-editing skills could prep the article first. It would certainly help me look over a few things. [[User:Sarujo]] will take of the refs later, as we've been discussing on his talk page. Your response? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 18:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
269102 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269099 +++$+++ 269101 +++$+++ 2009-01-10 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.231576980E09 +++$+++ I tried some, but I will need some guidance. I left a message on the article talk page. I'm sure as I read through it more I will become more familiar with it as I did eventually with [[Sagara Sanosuke]] whom I grew to really like! &mdash; +++$+++ :::I tried some, but I will need some guidance. I left a message on the article talk page. I'm sure as I read through it more I will become more familiar with it as I did eventually with [[Sagara Sanosuke]] whom I grew to really like! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

6959 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-17 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.292620800E09 +++$+++ Joe Romm writes an influential blog called Climate Progress.[http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2007\/10\/01\/another-must-read-from-hansen-%E2%80%98long-term%E2%80%99-climate-sensitivity-of-6%C2%B0c-for-doubled-co2\/] As you can see, Romm thinks Hansen is too conservative.  +++$+++ Joe Romm writes an influential blog called Climate Progress.[http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/01/another-must-read-from-hansen-%E2%80%98long-term%E2%80%99-climate-sensitivity-of-6%C2%B0c-for-doubled-co2/] As you can see, Romm thinks Hansen is too conservative. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 13:20, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
6960 +++$+++ Short Brigade Harvester Boris +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6959 +++$+++ 6959 +++$+++ 2010-12-17 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.292646180E09 +++$+++ Why should anyone care what Romm thinks about climate sensitivity?   +++$+++ :Why should anyone care what Romm thinks about climate sensitivity?  [[User:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|Short Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 20:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
6961 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6959 +++$+++ 6960 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.292667780E09 +++$+++ Boris, I don't know.  I just know they do.  +++$+++ ::Boris, I don't know.  I just know they do. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 02:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
6962 +++$+++ Short Brigade Harvester Boris +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6959 +++$+++ 6961 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.292672640E09 +++$+++ Who is this mysterious \"they\"?  +++$+++ :::Who is this mysterious "they"? [[User:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|Short Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 03:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
6963 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6959 +++$+++ 6962 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.292683800E09 +++$+++ Romm's blog readers and sycophants. +++$+++ ::::Romm's blog readers and sycophants.[[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 06:50, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
6964 +++$+++ Short Brigade Harvester Boris +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6959 +++$+++ 6963 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.292729100E09 +++$+++ That's a circular answer. (If you were intending to be flippant, I really don't mind.)  +++$+++ :::::That's a circular answer. (If you were intending to be flippant, I really don't mind.) [[User:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|Short Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 19:25, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

531248 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-25 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.290755580E09 +++$+++ Hello Royalbroil, this user: {{User|Thebigdixie}} has vandalised an article twice this month. Then I noticed he has be warned time after time, without getting blocked. Do you think he should be blocked for all the vandalism? '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ Hello Royalbroil, this user: {{User|Thebigdixie}} has vandalised an article twice this month. Then I noticed he has be warned time after time, without getting blocked. Do you think he should be blocked for all the vandalism? '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 23:13, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
531249 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531248 +++$+++ 531248 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.290771360E09 +++$+++ Tough one. Some good edits and some bad. I see I've given plenty of warnings myself. But not a vandalism-only account or else I would give a permanent block. Since the edits are rather infrequent, I won't block. You can list at [[WP:AIV]] if you want a second opinion. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Tough one. Some good edits and some bad. I see I've given plenty of warnings myself. But not a vandalism-only account or else I would give a permanent block. Since the edits are rather infrequent, I won't block. You can list at [[WP:AIV]] if you want a second opinion. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 03:36, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
531250 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531248 +++$+++ 531249 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.290773760E09 +++$+++ No, I rather not go there. Also, Happy Thanksgiving. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ ::No, I rather not go there. Also, Happy Thanksgiving. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 04:16, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
531251 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531248 +++$+++ 531249 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.290836760E09 +++$+++ I know this has nothing to do with the user, but how is [[Rick Hendrick]] since I cleaned it up and expanded it. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ ::I know this has nothing to do with the user, but how is [[Rick Hendrick]] since I cleaned it up and expanded it. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 21:46, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
531252 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531248 +++$+++ 531251 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.290861360E09 +++$+++ Definitely a great expansion, would be better with some more citations. Good job! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Definitely a great expansion, would be better with some more citations. Good job! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
531253 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531248 +++$+++ 531252 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.290861420E09 +++$+++ Thanks! '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ ::::Thanks! '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 04:37, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
531254 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531248 +++$+++ 531253 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.291608120E09 +++$+++ The user is continuing to vandalize the article. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ :::::The user is continuing to vandalize the article. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 20:02, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
531255 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531248 +++$+++ 531254 +++$+++ 2010-12-06 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.291638540E09 +++$+++ Yea, I had to give Dixie a [[Child time-out|timeout]] from editing. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::::::Yea, I had to give Dixie a [[Child time-out|timeout]] from editing. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:29, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
531256 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531248 +++$+++ 531255 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.291771740E09 +++$+++ Also not related to the user, but you are welcome to add your opinions to this [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates\/Junior at Darlington|featured picture canidate]]. It may be the first featured item for WP:NASCAR. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ :::::::Also not related to the user, but you are welcome to add your opinions to this [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Junior at Darlington|featured picture canidate]]. It may be the first featured item for WP:NASCAR. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 17:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

269105 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-08 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.231421280E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your response to my comment.  I do hope things work out for you.  Best wishes, <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Thank you for your response to my comment.  I do hope things work out for you.  Best wishes, <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 05:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
269106 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269105 +++$+++ 269105 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.231665120E09 +++$+++ I really appreciate the fact that you actually read through all those diff with the care and rationality to point out some discrepencies. Perhaps, if it is ok with you, I will check with you the next time a problem seems to be emerging. Thank you. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I really appreciate the fact that you actually read through all those diff with the care and rationality to point out some discrepencies. Perhaps, if it is ok with you, I will check with you the next time a problem seems to be emerging. Thank you. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:12, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

269107 +++$+++ Ohconfucius +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269107 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-09 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.231505040E09 +++$+++ I note the merger tag you placed on the above article almost a year ago. I've completed the merge and expanded the article. He seems like quite an important subject, and I think there is more to be done. Thanks for placing the tag. Someone gets around to it eventually!  +++$+++ I note the merger tag you placed on the above article almost a year ago. I've completed the merge and expanded the article. He seems like quite an important subject, and I think there is more to be done. Thanks for placing the tag. Someone gets around to it eventually! [[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius|talk]]) 04:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
269108 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269107 +++$+++ 269107 +++$+++ 2009-01-10 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.231659000E09 +++$+++ That's wonderful. Haiti is badly neglected and I am so glad you got that article up to snuff. There were many people important to the history of Haiti that have no articles or just tiny stubs. And Haiti has a fascinating, complex history that we should all know.  Congratulations! Perhaps you will have inspired me to get to work on some Haiti articles. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :That's wonderful. Haiti is badly neglected and I am so glad you got that article up to snuff. There were many people important to the history of Haiti that have no articles or just tiny stubs. And Haiti has a fascinating, complex history that we should all know.  Congratulations! Perhaps you will have inspired me to get to work on some Haiti articles. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

269109 +++$+++ Apoc2400 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269109 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-10 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.231622520E09 +++$+++ Without having checked all the details of it, that RFC looks like some people trying to silence criticism they don't like hearing. -- +++$+++ Without having checked all the details of it, that RFC looks like some people trying to silence criticism they don't like hearing. --[[User:Apoc2400|Apoc2400]] ([[User talk:Apoc2400|talk]]) 13:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
269110 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269109 +++$+++ 269109 +++$+++ 2009-01-10 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.231649160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments. I think you are right, but I also think I need to more carefully word my posts when I am frustrated. Sometimes that is hard to do when I have put a lot of work into an article. But I have learned from the RFC and I am really appreciative of the support I received! Thanks for taking the time to post here. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks for your comments. I think you are right, but I also think I need to more carefully word my posts when I am frustrated. Sometimes that is hard to do when I have put a lot of work into an article. But I have learned from the RFC and I am really appreciative of the support I received! Thanks for taking the time to post here. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

6966 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6966 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-18 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.292726340E09 +++$+++ You appear to be [[WP:EW|edit warring]] to insert contested content at [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]], and as the notice at the editing page points out, this article is among those subject to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Climate_change#Climate_change:_discretionary_sanctions CC discretionary sanctions]. Editors are required to edit cautiously, and you'd be well advised to seek consensus from other editors rather than trying to keep reverting in your changes which other editors clearly find contentious. Although you've not technically broken the 1RR notified at the edit page, continued reversion is seen as slow edit warring. This is just a clarification and reminder, as you presumably are unaware of the background, and is not a warning as described in the sanctions. Please discuss rather than reverting. .  +++$+++ You appear to be [[WP:EW|edit warring]] to insert contested content at [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]], and as the notice at the editing page points out, this article is among those subject to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate_change#Climate_change:_discretionary_sanctions CC discretionary sanctions]. Editors are required to edit cautiously, and you'd be well advised to seek consensus from other editors rather than trying to keep reverting in your changes which other editors clearly find contentious. Although you've not technically broken the 1RR notified at the edit page, continued reversion is seen as slow edit warring. This is just a clarification and reminder, as you presumably are unaware of the background, and is not a warning as described in the sanctions. Please discuss rather than reverting. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:39, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
6967 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6966 +++$+++ 6966 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.292727060E09 +++$+++ Dave, it would be easier to get consensus if editors would actually read what I have written.  Please read my comments in Talk before reverting my edit.  Your comments have not shown that you grasp the facts of the case.  +++$+++ :Dave, it would be easier to get consensus if editors would actually read what I have written.  Please read my comments in Talk before reverting my edit.  Your comments have not shown that you grasp the facts of the case. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram#top|talk]]) 18:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

269111 +++$+++ MisfitToys +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269111 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-10 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.231647480E09 +++$+++ Since you did a [[Talk:Rickey Henderson\/GA1|GA review]] of the [[Rickey Henderson]] article in August, I was hoping you might have a look at it due to an edit war regarding the intro. Another editor and I are [[Talk:Rickey Henderson#Introduction revert|arguing]] over two potential versions, which can be found [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rickey_Henderson&diff=263074854&oldid=263048558 here] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rickey_Henderson&diff=262874608&oldid=262874424 here]; please have a look and offer your ideas. Thanks.  +++$+++ Since you did a [[Talk:Rickey Henderson/GA1|GA review]] of the [[Rickey Henderson]] article in August, I was hoping you might have a look at it due to an edit war regarding the intro. Another editor and I are [[Talk:Rickey Henderson#Introduction revert|arguing]] over two potential versions, which can be found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rickey_Henderson&diff=263074854&oldid=263048558 here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rickey_Henderson&diff=262874608&oldid=262874424 here]; please have a look and offer your ideas. Thanks. [[User:MisfitToys|MisfitToys]] ([[User talk:MisfitToys|talk]]) 20:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
269112 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269111 +++$+++ 269111 +++$+++ 2009-01-10 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.231648740E09 +++$+++ I can certainly try to help with the article.  Is the issue that you want to submit it to FAC and so want it to fulfill the FAC criteria? I will try to figure out what the situation is now. Fill me in about anything you think I should know. I will go through the article  I really like Ricky Henderson, but I don't know a whole lot about baseball. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I can certainly try to help with the article.  Is the issue that you want to submit it to FAC and so want it to fulfill the FAC criteria? I will try to figure out what the situation is now. Fill me in about anything you think I should know. I will go through the article  I really like Ricky Henderson, but I don't know a whole lot about baseball. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:39, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

6968 +++$+++ J. Johnson +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6968 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-30 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.293772020E09 +++$+++ Hello, Ron.  Are you still with us?  I am a little surprised not to see you at [[Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming#Strictly and solely a LIST of notable \"skeptic\" scientists?]], which I think would be a good opportunity to sort out what the article ''should be''.   I believe a lot of the discussion has been at odds because we all have some what variant views here.  One possible outcome is that we clarify which way we all pull.  Alternately, if we have radically different concepts of the article, those might be accommodated with separate articles.  Either way, I think your view on this ought to be represented.  See you there? -  +++$+++ Hello, Ron.  Are you still with us?  I am a little surprised not to see you at [[Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming#Strictly and solely a LIST of notable "skeptic" scientists?]], which I think would be a good opportunity to sort out what the article ''should be''.   I believe a lot of the discussion has been at odds because we all have some what variant views here.  One possible outcome is that we clarify which way we all pull.  Alternately, if we have radically different concepts of the article, those might be accommodated with separate articles.  Either way, I think your view on this ought to be represented.  See you there? - [[User:J. Johnson|J. Johnson (JJ)]] ([[User talk:J. Johnson|talk]]) 21:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
6969 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ 6968 +++$+++ 6968 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308781320E09 +++$+++ Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives\u2014which houses some of America's most important historical documents\u2014is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/NARA\/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]].  +++$+++ :Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]]. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
6970 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6968 +++$+++ 6968 +++$+++ 2022-01-26 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.643211240E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ *[[User:Brad101|Brad]] ([[User talk:Brad101#top|talk]]) 07:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

269113 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-11 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.231669800E09 +++$+++ Hey, I'm not sure if I've said this yet but thanks for the fixes you made to [[Slammiversary (2008)]]. I've been here a year today, and in that time I've gotten one FA and four GAs. Maybe before the night is over it will be five GAs. (reply on my page if you don't mind).-- +++$+++ Hey, I'm not sure if I've said this yet but thanks for the fixes you made to [[Slammiversary (2008)]]. I've been here a year today, and in that time I've gotten one FA and four GAs. Maybe before the night is over it will be five GAs. (reply on my page if you don't mind).--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 02:30, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
269114 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269113 +++$+++ 269113 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.231670100E09 +++$+++ I will reply on your page as requested. But congratulations! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I will reply on your page as requested. But congratulations! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
269115 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269113 +++$+++ 269114 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.231671240E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but I'm probably not going to take it to FAC for a while, but plans change. Why were you in trouble after a year?-- +++$+++ ::Thanks, but I'm probably not going to take it to FAC for a while, but plans change. Why were you in trouble after a year?--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 02:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
269116 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269113 +++$+++ 269115 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.231679160E09 +++$+++ How much do you really want to know!! For a glimpse (if there is a time you are bored and have nothing else to do) read [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Mattisse]]. The editors that filed that RFC were [[:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ekajati]], I learned in [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Starwood]]. A long story!  &mdash; +++$+++ :::How much do you really want to know!! For a glimpse (if there is a time you are bored and have nothing else to do) read [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mattisse]]. The editors that filed that RFC were [[:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ekajati]], I learned in [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Starwood]]. A long story!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 05:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
269117 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269113 +++$+++ 269113 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.231679820E09 +++$+++ I know! A double-edged sword! I've been watching but figured you could handle it for now. but I will always keep my eye on it.  Another article I was involved with [[Frank Zappa]] seems a magnet for vandals even now, months after the main page,  and the primary editor, every once in a while, just reverts to the last  stable version. Sometimes I feel as emotionally involved as the primary editor does.  I really like your article! It may not be as bad as Zappa for attracting vandals and you may get some useful edits to it. &mdash; +++$+++ :I know! A double-edged sword! I've been watching but figured you could handle it for now. but I will always keep my eye on it.  Another article I was involved with [[Frank Zappa]] seems a magnet for vandals even now, months after the main page,  and the primary editor, every once in a while, just reverts to the last  stable version. Sometimes I feel as emotionally involved as the primary editor does.  I really like your article! It may not be as bad as Zappa for attracting vandals and you may get some useful edits to it. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 05:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

219615 +++$+++ Kusunose +++$+++ Historiographer +++$+++ 219615 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-28 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.293540060E09 +++$+++ [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]'''&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Template:History of Korea]]. Users who [[WP:DISRUPT|edit disruptively]] or refuse to [[WP:COLLABORATE|collaborate]] with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If unsuccessful, then '''do not edit war even if you believe you are right'''. Post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If edit warring continues, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- +++$+++ [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]'''&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Template:History of Korea]]. Users who [[WP:DISRUPT|edit disruptively]] or refuse to [[WP:COLLABORATE|collaborate]] with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If unsuccessful, then '''do not edit war even if you believe you are right'''. Post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If edit warring continues, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --[[User:Kusunose|Kusunose]] 04:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
219616 +++$+++ Historiographer +++$+++ Historiographer +++$+++ 219615 +++$+++ 219615 +++$+++ 2010-12-28 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.293540780E09 +++$+++ Huh, edit-war was completed in last friday. I want to know about the meaning of Your belated response. But, Absolutely, I'm break off edit wars until showing alternative version.-- +++$+++ :Huh, edit-war was completed in last friday. I want to know about the meaning of Your belated response. But, Absolutely, I'm break off edit wars until showing alternative version.--[[User:Historiographer|Historiographer]] ([[User talk:Historiographer#top|talk]]) 04:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
219617 +++$+++ Kusunose +++$+++ Historiographer +++$+++ 219615 +++$+++ 219616 +++$+++ 2010-12-28 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.293541800E09 +++$+++ Seeing the edit history, the edit war sometimes stops few days then resumes so I don't think my warnings are too late. Anyway, Thank you for your consideration. -- +++$+++ ::Seeing the edit history, the edit war sometimes stops few days then resumes so I don't think my warnings are too late. Anyway, Thank you for your consideration. --[[User:Kusunose|Kusunose]] 05:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
219618 +++$+++ Historiographer +++$+++ Historiographer +++$+++ 219615 +++$+++ 219615 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.295891400E09 +++$+++ Who saying I ever did it like your words? You or Your other IPs? Don\xb4t provoke a quarrel uselessly.-- +++$+++ :Who saying I ever did it like your words? You or Your other IPs? Don´t provoke a quarrel uselessly.--[[User:Historiographer|Historiographer]] ([[User talk:Historiographer#top|talk]]) 09:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

6973 +++$+++ Penyulap +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-18 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310976000E09 +++$+++ I got a kick from the B5 reference, I like that char. I like when he came back through time and saw 'the one' and was saying how he looked like the one but wasn't the one. Oh I loved that series and was sad to see it go. I should get a hold of it and store it until my memory of it fades some more, then I can watch and enjoy it anew. Anyhow, my sincerest thanks for the assistance, I took a break from that article, but that doesn't diminish the help your have given to me, personally at all, I'll apply those guidelines to all work I do from now on, so I learn not to look at those same kind of mistakes anymore without noticing. I look forward to that article being improved a great deal more, it has such a long way to go, and I feel the subject is of such great importance as an inspiration to help bring reality closer to Sci-Fi. It would be lovely to help raise a generation that believes a series of space stations through the solar system and colonies on deep space worlds is not any kind of dream, but an obvious need and reality. It was interesting to read an American observer summing up that the Russians\/Soviets genuinely 'took very seriously the idea' that tens of thousands (or more) of their citizens would be living permanently in space one day (and were working to make it reality). <span style=\"text-shadow:#c5C3e3  0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ I got a kick from the B5 reference, I like that char. I like when he came back through time and saw 'the one' and was saying how he looked like the one but wasn't the one. Oh I loved that series and was sad to see it go. I should get a hold of it and store it until my memory of it fades some more, then I can watch and enjoy it anew. Anyhow, my sincerest thanks for the assistance, I took a break from that article, but that doesn't diminish the help your have given to me, personally at all, I'll apply those guidelines to all work I do from now on, so I learn not to look at those same kind of mistakes anymore without noticing. I look forward to that article being improved a great deal more, it has such a long way to go, and I feel the subject is of such great importance as an inspiration to help bring reality closer to Sci-Fi. It would be lovely to help raise a generation that believes a series of space stations through the solar system and colonies on deep space worlds is not any kind of dream, but an obvious need and reality. It was interesting to read an American observer summing up that the Russians/Soviets genuinely 'took very seriously the idea' that tens of thousands (or more) of their citizens would be living permanently in space one day (and were working to make it reality). <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3  0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User:Penyulap|<span style="color:#002100">'''Penyulap'''</span>]]</span><sub>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:07AA07">''' talk'''</span>]]</sub> 01:00, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
6974 +++$+++ Penyulap +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6973 +++$+++ 6973 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.312226820E09 +++$+++ Hello Brad, I apologize for the trouble my inexperience has caused, is there any way we can assist each other with the FAR process ? I saw your comment regarding the chronology of the FAR, can I assist there, or is that not required ? <span style=\"text-shadow:#c5C3e3  0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ :Hello Brad, I apologize for the trouble my inexperience has caused, is there any way we can assist each other with the FAR process ? I saw your comment regarding the chronology of the FAR, can I assist there, or is that not required ? <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3  0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User:Penyulap|<span style="color:#002100">'''Penyulap'''</span>]]</span><sub>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:07AA07">''' talk'''</span>]]</sub> 12:27, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
6975 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6973 +++$+++ 6974 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.312279080E09 +++$+++ Everything is fine; I was merely pointing out the story behind that particular FAR so everyone would understand. There hasn't been much effort at all to fix the problems I outlined so I would say at this point the article is in danger of losing its FA status unless some serious work begins.  +++$+++ ::Everything is fine; I was merely pointing out the story behind that particular FAR so everyone would understand. There hasn't been much effort at all to fix the problems I outlined so I would say at this point the article is in danger of losing its FA status unless some serious work begins. [[User:Brad101|Brad]] ([[User talk:Brad101#top|talk]]) 02:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
6976 +++$+++ Penyulap +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6973 +++$+++ 6975 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.312290180E09 +++$+++ Well that may paint me up as a bit of a villain, although, looking at what a few people probably think of me atm, that may be an improvement, lolz. My original intention was for the article to pass through FAR as FAR is intended to work, and come out better for the experience. But I feel so restrained from helping with it, I see so many things it fails for, that other eyes can't see, and they can see way more than me, that I can't see, and we can't work together, it's heartbreaking and DGAF at the same time. I need to do some research to find out if there is an Israeli Module and a Palestinian module up there, it would explain a lot. It reminds me of trying to steal the eggs out from under a chicken that is sitting on them, without getting pecked. I think I should try to collaborate on a humorous essay to that effect, something nice and balanced, good to lighten up the mood.(and mine). The way I see it right now, the article has to come to FAR maybe biannually each time it's been hatched and spills out putrid currency. Anyhow, I hope to find some better way to work around the problems, or work with people, so I don't give up. I compressed the notifications to make it look more the part, but didn't compress or cleanup my monologue, because I didn't know if thats allowed, good form or didn't matter, I'll go with the last one for now. Thank you so very much for the response I appreciate it. <span style=\"text-shadow:#c5C3e3  0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ :::Well that may paint me up as a bit of a villain, although, looking at what a few people probably think of me atm, that may be an improvement, lolz. My original intention was for the article to pass through FAR as FAR is intended to work, and come out better for the experience. But I feel so restrained from helping with it, I see so many things it fails for, that other eyes can't see, and they can see way more than me, that I can't see, and we can't work together, it's heartbreaking and DGAF at the same time. I need to do some research to find out if there is an Israeli Module and a Palestinian module up there, it would explain a lot. It reminds me of trying to steal the eggs out from under a chicken that is sitting on them, without getting pecked. I think I should try to collaborate on a humorous essay to that effect, something nice and balanced, good to lighten up the mood.(and mine). The way I see it right now, the article has to come to FAR maybe biannually each time it's been hatched and spills out putrid currency. Anyhow, I hope to find some better way to work around the problems, or work with people, so I don't give up. I compressed the notifications to make it look more the part, but didn't compress or cleanup my monologue, because I didn't know if thats allowed, good form or didn't matter, I'll go with the last one for now. Thank you so very much for the response I appreciate it. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3  0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User:Penyulap|<span style="color:#002100">'''Penyulap'''</span>]]</span><sub>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:07AA07">''' talk'''</span>]]</sub> 06:03, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
6977 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6973 +++$+++ 6976 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 09:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312302960E09 +++$+++ You've had the right idea but your postings are quite verbose and a lot of people won't take you very seriously when they have to read through multiple paragraphs. The [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=International_Space_Station&oldid=337438746 version] that passed to FA 18 months ago was in fairly good condition although I would have to say that I wouldn't have supported its promotion in that condition. The current article shows the amount of deterioration that has taken place. The only way to keep an article featured is to watch over it constantly and update when needed. Obviously that hasn't been the case.  +++$+++ ::::You've had the right idea but your postings are quite verbose and a lot of people won't take you very seriously when they have to read through multiple paragraphs. The [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_Space_Station&oldid=337438746 version] that passed to FA 18 months ago was in fairly good condition although I would have to say that I wouldn't have supported its promotion in that condition. The current article shows the amount of deterioration that has taken place. The only way to keep an article featured is to watch over it constantly and update when needed. Obviously that hasn't been the case. [[User:Brad101|Brad]] ([[User talk:Brad101#top|talk]]) 09:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
6978 +++$+++ Penyulap +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6973 +++$+++ 6977 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312328820E09 +++$+++ I do talk too much alright, this article I think is the entry point for a lot of new inexperienced editors like me, I try to assist others to 'get settled in' and hand on the minuscule knowledge I've gained [[User:Leebrandoncremer|like this guy]] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=International_Space_Station&action=historysubmit&diff=440051334&oldid=439969106]. At least as wp:spiderman I collect experiences and examples that will help me to assist newbies directly, write guides for newbies, and illustrate rapport with them. I think newbie expectations from ROTN (rest of the Net), like giving mods (admins) more respect, do not in any way translate onto WP because mods are looked to for guidance and assistance as well, here, they get the respect of course, but there is very little if any assistance given, in my experience. I'm seeing that as something I can write for, and comment on, and maybe, god forbid, suggest more names for more offices. I think the ISS and shuttle are the treetrunks for spaceflight on wiki, both new material and editors enter here, and flow outwards into other articles. When the hard work of FA was done, an iron ring was created to protect that work, rightly so, it's proper human nature and a good idea. The flow however doesn't stop, it increases, and is now deflected, deleted and wp:leaving. Nothing is getting through into science. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_research_on_the_ISS this] is science on the ISS, [http:\/\/events.eoportal.org\/presentations\/330\/10001431.html this] and [http:\/\/www.aprsaf.org\/data\/aprsaf17_data\/DAY1-seu_0950-Kibo_Utilization_Status.pdf this] is how they should look. As the tree has grown, the iron ring is now ring-barking spaceflight. The situation requires such tact in some respects[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Colds7ream]. Many editors, especially me, have a great deal of time on their hands because of RL, and do a lot of research and googling. <span style=\"text-shadow:#c5C3e3  0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ :::::I do talk too much alright, this article I think is the entry point for a lot of new inexperienced editors like me, I try to assist others to 'get settled in' and hand on the minuscule knowledge I've gained [[User:Leebrandoncremer|like this guy]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_Space_Station&action=historysubmit&diff=440051334&oldid=439969106]. At least as wp:spiderman I collect experiences and examples that will help me to assist newbies directly, write guides for newbies, and illustrate rapport with them. I think newbie expectations from ROTN (rest of the Net), like giving mods (admins) more respect, do not in any way translate onto WP because mods are looked to for guidance and assistance as well, here, they get the respect of course, but there is very little if any assistance given, in my experience. I'm seeing that as something I can write for, and comment on, and maybe, god forbid, suggest more names for more offices. I think the ISS and shuttle are the treetrunks for spaceflight on wiki, both new material and editors enter here, and flow outwards into other articles. When the hard work of FA was done, an iron ring was created to protect that work, rightly so, it's proper human nature and a good idea. The flow however doesn't stop, it increases, and is now deflected, deleted and wp:leaving. Nothing is getting through into science. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_research_on_the_ISS this] is science on the ISS, [http://events.eoportal.org/presentations/330/10001431.html this] and [http://www.aprsaf.org/data/aprsaf17_data/DAY1-seu_0950-Kibo_Utilization_Status.pdf this] is how they should look. As the tree has grown, the iron ring is now ring-barking spaceflight. The situation requires such tact in some respects[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Colds7ream]. Many editors, especially me, have a great deal of time on their hands because of RL, and do a lot of research and googling. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3  0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User:Penyulap|<span style="color:#002100">'''Penyulap'''</span>]]</span><sub>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:07AA07">''' talk'''</span>]]</sub> 16:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

269118 +++$+++ GaryColemanFan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-11 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.231681260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing this article. I have looked for more personal information, but there's not a lot. I have found a good source for him being married to Michi Saito, but that's about all of the personal information that appears to be available (aside from the arrest). I'm not going to go to GAR, because I think you make a good case for it not having enough depth to interest the average reader. I was interested to see if it would meet the GA criteria, but apparently it's not there yet. Thanks again.  +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing this article. I have looked for more personal information, but there's not a lot. I have found a good source for him being married to Michi Saito, but that's about all of the personal information that appears to be available (aside from the arrest). I'm not going to go to GAR, because I think you make a good case for it not having enough depth to interest the average reader. I was interested to see if it would meet the GA criteria, but apparently it's not there yet. Thanks again. [[User:GaryColemanFan|GaryColemanFan]] ([[User talk:GaryColemanFan|talk]]) 05:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
269119 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269118 +++$+++ 269118 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.231681740E09 +++$+++ I figured that was the case, as normally you are not at a loss for information! Is there more info on his wrestling style, what made him different, why was he so good as to win so many championships? &mdash; +++$+++ :I figured that was the case, as normally you are not at a loss for information! Is there more info on his wrestling style, what made him different, why was he so good as to win so many championships? &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 05:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

531263 +++$+++ Fullrabb +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-10 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.292013780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Fullrabb|Fullrabb]] ([[User talk:Fullrabb|talk]]) 12:43, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
531264 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531263 +++$+++ 531263 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.292104920E09 +++$+++ I read it. The grammar is very good, although it is very light on citations to reliable sources. I marked one that especially important, and another important one is the list of NFL players. There really should be citations to cover everyone and a minimum of one citation per paragraph. I didn't check your sources to ensure that it's not [[Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing|close paraphrase]]. Overall, well done! '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :I read it. The grammar is very good, although it is very light on citations to reliable sources. I marked one that especially important, and another important one is the list of NFL players. There really should be citations to cover everyone and a minimum of one citation per paragraph. I didn't check your sources to ensure that it's not [[Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing|close paraphrase]]. Overall, well done! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 14:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

269121 +++$+++ Rusty Cashman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269121 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-12 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.231812960E09 +++$+++ [[History of evolutionary thought]] has been nominated at [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article\/requests]] to run on Feb 12, the 200th anniversary of Darwin's birth. Since you were kind enough to express support for this idea during the pre-nomination debate I thought you might want to comment on the actual nomination. Thanks.  +++$+++ [[History of evolutionary thought]] has been nominated at [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests]] to run on Feb 12, the 200th anniversary of Darwin's birth. Since you were kind enough to express support for this idea during the pre-nomination debate I thought you might want to comment on the actual nomination. Thanks. [[User:Rusty Cashman|Rusty Cashman]] ([[User talk:Rusty Cashman|talk]]) 18:16, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
269122 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269121 +++$+++ 269121 +++$+++ 2009-01-12 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.231813380E09 +++$+++ Yes! (I am the second highest contributor to the article, after you!)  &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes! (I am the second highest contributor to the article, after you!)  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:23, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

269123 +++$+++ PhotobloggerNYT +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269123 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-07 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.231391340E09 +++$+++ Its even our class assignement to make a Wiki article. I am flabbergasted that it been so difficult with all the correct reference links and obvious notability.  +++$+++ Its even our class assignement to make a Wiki article. I am flabbergasted that it been so difficult with all the correct reference links and obvious notability. [[User:PhotobloggerNYT|PhotobloggerNYT]] ([[User talk:PhotobloggerNYT|talk]]) 21:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
269124 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269123 +++$+++ 269123 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.231391820E09 +++$+++ [[User:Wehwalt]] just undeleted this as I was trying to restore it.   +++$+++ :[[User:Wehwalt]] just undeleted this as I was trying to restore it.  [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 21:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
269125 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269123 +++$+++ 269124 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.231392600E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I did because it looks like there was a conflict between two admins, one of whom declined a speedy and one of whom granted it (three minutes apart, so I doubt it was wheel warring).  I'm leaving them to figure it out themselves.  Photoblogger already was in touch with one of them.-- +++$+++ ::Yeah, I did because it looks like there was a conflict between two admins, one of whom declined a speedy and one of whom granted it (three minutes apart, so I doubt it was wheel warring).  I'm leaving them to figure it out themselves.  Photoblogger already was in touch with one of them.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

6980 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.311465780E09 +++$+++ Thanks  +++$+++ Thanks [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 17:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
6981 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6980 +++$+++ 6980 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.311490200E09 +++$+++ Thank you ever so much for fixing those, I do not often come across image rationales and the specificity of the article had escaped my attention. I will try and look at the ref problems tomorrow as I am off for the night in a moment.  +++$+++ :Thank you ever so much for fixing those, I do not often come across image rationales and the specificity of the article had escaped my attention. I will try and look at the ref problems tomorrow as I am off for the night in a moment. [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 23:50, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
6982 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6980 +++$+++ 6981 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311643740E09 +++$+++ I have encountered a little problem with citation styles, see the [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Blade Runner\/archive2|FACR page 2]], [[Talk:Blade_Runner#Citation cleanup]], my post at [[Wikipedia_talk:Featured articles#Citations]], and the diffs [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Blade_Runner&action=historysubmit&diff=441385707&oldid=441383177]. I am unsure as to how that may be resolved, is it necessary to put them into one style?  +++$+++ ::I have encountered a little problem with citation styles, see the [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Blade Runner/archive2|FACR page 2]], [[Talk:Blade_Runner#Citation cleanup]], my post at [[Wikipedia_talk:Featured articles#Citations]], and the diffs [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blade_Runner&action=historysubmit&diff=441385707&oldid=441383177]. I am unsure as to how that may be resolved, is it necessary to put them into one style? [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 18:29, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
6983 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6980 +++$+++ 6982 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.311813840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for stepping in and the help you have given. I tried to work collaboratively with the other person but it seems that they wish to \"do it themselves, their own way\". I must admit it is a little \"owney\", but at least the work is mostly done - the main aim, of course, being to save the FA star if possible.  +++$+++ :::Thanks for stepping in and the help you have given. I tried to work collaboratively with the other person but it seems that they wish to "do it themselves, their own way". I must admit it is a little "owney", but at least the work is mostly done - the main aim, of course, being to save the FA star if possible. [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 17:44, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
6984 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6980 +++$+++ 6983 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311816300E09 +++$+++ I consider the 2c problems fixed now. I did notice that the rationales for the two images I outlined at the FAR still need to be changed. Almost done.  +++$+++ ::::I consider the 2c problems fixed now. I did notice that the rationales for the two images I outlined at the FAR still need to be changed. Almost done. [[User:Brad101|Brad]] ([[User talk:Brad101#top|talk]]) 18:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
6985 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6980 +++$+++ 6984 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312027860E09 +++$+++ It is my first attempt at writing rationales, I must admit that my first edits were pretty off the mark though :\xac)  +++$+++ :::::It is my first attempt at writing rationales, I must admit that my first edits were pretty off the mark though :¬) [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 05:11, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

569142 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-11 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.163314380E09 +++$+++ Sorry, the recreation was mine, not [[User:Sr13]]. It is my belief that small articles are better than red links, as anonymous can expand stubs but can't create articles. However, I understand your position, and thus I am sorry for having recreated the article. --  +++$+++ Sorry, the recreation was mine, not [[User:Sr13]]. It is my belief that small articles are better than red links, as anonymous can expand stubs but can't create articles. However, I understand your position, and thus I am sorry for having recreated the article. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 22:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
569143 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569142 +++$+++ 569142 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.163314740E09 +++$+++ I can see your point of view as well but an encyclopedia article that offers nothing more than the product of a Google search isn't very useful!  We're all dedicated to helping researchers, so we just need to educate those editors who don't understand the process of article creation when the opportunity arises. Regards,  +++$+++ :I can see your point of view as well but an encyclopedia article that offers nothing more than the product of a Google search isn't very useful!  We're all dedicated to helping researchers, so we just need to educate those editors who don't understand the process of article creation when the opportunity arises. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
569144 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569142 +++$+++ 569142 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.163316420E09 +++$+++ Firstly, please sign your Talk page comments with four tildes, <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>, as this makes it easier to respond to your questions.  Secondly, the deleted article was in no way related to the minimal content, hence its deletion.  As to your second question, you don't post images on to articles; they are uploaded using the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Upload Upload file] link on the left-hand side menu.  You can then link to the image from the article.  Please read the links on the page before uploading images to ensure that you are doing so legally. Regards,  +++$+++ :Firstly, please sign your Talk page comments with four tildes, <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, as this makes it easier to respond to your questions.  Secondly, the deleted article was in no way related to the minimal content, hence its deletion.  As to your second question, you don't post images on to articles; they are uploaded using the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload Upload file] link on the left-hand side menu.  You can then link to the image from the article.  Please read the links on the page before uploading images to ensure that you are doing so legally. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:27, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

269126 +++$+++ PhotobloggerNYT +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-07 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.231392720E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your help.  +++$+++ Thank you for your help. [[User:PhotobloggerNYT|PhotobloggerNYT]] ([[User talk:PhotobloggerNYT|talk]]) 21:32, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
269127 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269126 +++$+++ 269126 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.231392840E09 +++$+++ I think you will have to address it through [[User:Hoary]]'s talk page.  Apparently Hoary did save the article in a sandbox, where it can be improved and perhaps resubmitted.-- +++$+++ :I think you will have to address it through [[User:Hoary]]'s talk page.  Apparently Hoary did save the article in a sandbox, where it can be improved and perhaps resubmitted.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
269128 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269126 +++$+++ 269127 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.231394940E09 +++$+++ I have looked for good references on this photographer and cannot find any. I am concluding that the page will not be undeleted as the subject is not notable. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::I have looked for good references on this photographer and cannot find any. I am concluding that the page will not be undeleted as the subject is not notable. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

531271 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-10 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.291973100E09 +++$+++ {{Talkback|Nascar1996}} '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ {{Talkback|Nascar1996}} '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 01:25, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
531272 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531271 +++$+++ 531271 +++$+++ 2010-12-14 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.292329740E09 +++$+++ Do you think that [[Jimmie Johnson#List of Jimmie Johnson's wins]] section should still be required with the new [[Jimmie Johnson#Complete Sprint Cup Series results]] section? '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ :Do you think that [[Jimmie Johnson#List of Jimmie Johnson's wins]] section should still be required with the new [[Jimmie Johnson#Complete Sprint Cup Series results]] section? '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 04:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
531273 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531271 +++$+++ 531271 +++$+++ 2010-12-14 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.292330700E09 +++$+++ No, I'd remove it and justify it as too much detail. Wikipedia is not a statistics database. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :No, I'd remove it and justify it as too much detail. Wikipedia is not a statistics database. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 04:45, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
531274 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531271 +++$+++ 531273 +++$+++ 2010-12-17 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.292589420E09 +++$+++ You may consider contacting the uploader of this [[:File:Dale Sr 1994.jpg|image]] on Flickr because the current license says not for commercial use. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Arial\"> +++$+++ ::You may consider contacting the uploader of this [[:File:Dale Sr 1994.jpg|image]] on Flickr because the current license says not for commercial use. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Arial">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 04:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
531275 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531271 +++$+++ 531274 +++$+++ 2010-12-17 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.292620260E09 +++$+++ An earlier license ''had'' to have allowed Commercial or else the bot wouldn't have done the upload. I wouldn't have even tried. Since it was legally obtained, the Commons version is legal. They are not able to [[Wikipedia:Revocation of our licensing is not permitted|revoke]] once uploaded, at least on our version of the image. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::An earlier license ''had'' to have allowed Commercial or else the bot wouldn't have done the upload. I wouldn't have even tried. Since it was legally obtained, the Commons version is legal. They are not able to [[Wikipedia:Revocation of our licensing is not permitted|revoke]] once uploaded, at least on our version of the image. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 13:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
531276 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531271 +++$+++ 531275 +++$+++ 2010-12-17 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.292623740E09 +++$+++ Okay, I was wondering about the image. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Arial\"> +++$+++ ::::Okay, I was wondering about the image. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Arial">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 14:09, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

6986 +++$+++  +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6986 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.311684840E09 +++$+++ Enjoy. :-)  +++$+++ Enjoy. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 05:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
6987 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6986 +++$+++ 6986 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311774540E09 +++$+++ Thanks Ed but nothing really exciting there except maybe the 1931 pic. What I really need is a good pic of ''United States'' suitable for the infobox pic rather than the pos that's there now.  +++$+++ :Thanks Ed but nothing really exciting there except maybe the 1931 pic. What I really need is a good pic of ''United States'' suitable for the infobox pic rather than the pos that's there now. [[User:Brad101|Brad]] ([[User talk:Brad101#top|talk]]) 06:49, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
6988 +++$+++  +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6986 +++$+++ 6987 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311774780E09 +++$+++ No worries. I've been categorizing all of the ships and thought you'd be at least interested in them. :-)  +++$+++ ::No worries. I've been categorizing all of the ships and thought you'd be at least interested in them. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:53, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

269131 +++$+++ PhotobloggerNYT +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269131 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-13 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.231909380E09 +++$+++ It's in my sandbox, now that I have rewritten it, how to I go about submitting it again? Also, would you kindly take a look at it and see if you like it? Thank you!! Sarah +++$+++ It's in my sandbox, now that I have rewritten it, how to I go about submitting it again? Also, would you kindly take a look at it and see if you like it? Thank you!! Sarah[[User:PhotobloggerNYT|PhotobloggerNYT]] ([[User talk:PhotobloggerNYT|talk]]) 21:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269132 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269131 +++$+++ 269131 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.231909500E09 +++$+++ I didn't delete it, it I had undeleted it to look at it.-- +++$+++ :I didn't delete it, it I had undeleted it to look at it.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269133 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269131 +++$+++ 269132 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.231909680E09 +++$+++ Well, I don't understand what is going on. If the article can be referenced, will it be allowed out of the sandbox? What's the deal?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Well, I don't understand what is going on. If the article can be referenced, will it be allowed out of the sandbox? What's the deal?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269134 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269131 +++$+++ 269133 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.231910100E09 +++$+++ As I recall, it's been deleted three times, once recently not counting the undelete\/redelete.  I'd really have to research who was involved.-- +++$+++ :::As I recall, it's been deleted three times, once recently not counting the undelete/redelete.  I'd really have to research who was involved.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:15, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269135 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269131 +++$+++ 269134 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.231910280E09 +++$+++ [[User:PhotobloggerNYT]], the article in your sandbox does not have [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], which every article must have, especially one where there is no evidence this person is [[WP:NOTABLE|notable]] by Wikipedia standards. Sorry!  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::[[User:PhotobloggerNYT]], the article in your sandbox does not have [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], which every article must have, especially one where there is no evidence this person is [[WP:NOTABLE|notable]] by Wikipedia standards. Sorry!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269136 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269131 +++$+++ 269135 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.231910400E09 +++$+++ Wehwalt, it is not a notable subject; it has no reliable sources. None. So I don't think you should spend time worrying about it.    &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Wehwalt, it is not a notable subject; it has no reliable sources. None. So I don't think you should spend time worrying about it.    &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

6989 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6989 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311808380E09 +++$+++ Brad, would you mind assessing this new article for WPSHIPS?  It's been nominated for DYK, and I think it's valuable for you to pass an eye over it and give it an assessment.   +++$+++ Brad, would you mind assessing this new article for WPSHIPS?  It's been nominated for DYK, and I think it's valuable for you to pass an eye over it and give it an assessment.  [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 16:13, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
6990 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6989 +++$+++ 6989 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311816300E09 +++$+++ This article was already assessed by me a few days ago and hasn't changed much since. Don't see any reason why it needs an assessment.  +++$+++ :This article was already assessed by me a few days ago and hasn't changed much since. Don't see any reason why it needs an assessment. [[User:Brad101|Brad]] ([[User talk:Brad101#top|talk]]) 18:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

6991 +++$+++ Coemgenus +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311808860E09 +++$+++ Do you know the convention at [[Wikipedia:MILHIST]] for listing ships' names?  In [[Chester_A._Arthur#Naval_reform|this article]], I left off the \"U.S.S.\", but there was a question at peer review over whether that was proper.  Thanks, -- +++$+++ Do you know the convention at [[Wikipedia:MILHIST]] for listing ships' names?  In [[Chester_A._Arthur#Naval_reform|this article]], I left off the "U.S.S.", but there was a question at peer review over whether that was proper.  Thanks, --[[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]] ([[User talk:Coemgenus|talk]]) 16:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
6992 +++$+++  +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6991 +++$+++ 6991 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311811200E09 +++$+++ {{tps}} I commented at the PR. :-)  +++$+++ :{{tps}} I commented at the PR. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 17:00, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
6993 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6991 +++$+++ 6992 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311816300E09 +++$+++ No problem; just don't leave a brownie on my page. heh.  +++$+++ ::No problem; just don't leave a brownie on my page. heh. [[User:Brad101|Brad]] ([[User talk:Brad101#top|talk]]) 18:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
6994 +++$+++  +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6991 +++$+++ 6993 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311860340E09 +++$+++ Not even a kitten? ;)  +++$+++ :::Not even a kitten? ;) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:39, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

269137 +++$+++ PhotobloggerNYT +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-13 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.231914360E09 +++$+++ What do you consider \"reliable\" sources?  I am at a loss, I thought linking the Vogue and Surface would be enough. Please elaborate. Thank you. +++$+++ What do you consider "reliable" sources?  I am at a loss, I thought linking the Vogue and Surface would be enough. Please elaborate. Thank you.[[User:PhotobloggerNYT|PhotobloggerNYT]] ([[User talk:PhotobloggerNYT|talk]]) 22:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269138 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269137 +++$+++ 269137 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.231916580E09 +++$+++ PhotobloggerNYT, go to this page and read it:  '''[[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]]''' I will try to find a sample article so you can see.  &mdash; +++$+++ :PhotobloggerNYT, go to this page and read it:  '''[[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]]''' I will try to find a sample article so you can see.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269139 +++$+++ KP Botany +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269137 +++$+++ 269138 +++$+++ 2009-01-14 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.231923720E09 +++$+++ PhotobloggerNYT, can we move this general discussion about your article and sources to your talk page, intead of having it on 3 users' talk pages?  Unfortunately, Mattisse is correct about your sources, they are not reliable sources.  Most of the sources you linked to are blogs, and anyone can say anything on a blog.  If he's been in Brazilian, Italian, and Spanish Vogue they will have small articles about him that give his bio and credentials.  This are considered reliable sources.  But, please do start by reading the link that Mattisse gave, and I will copy this post to your talk page to discuss there.  -- +++$+++ ::PhotobloggerNYT, can we move this general discussion about your article and sources to your talk page, intead of having it on 3 users' talk pages?  Unfortunately, Mattisse is correct about your sources, they are not reliable sources.  Most of the sources you linked to are blogs, and anyone can say anything on a blog.  If he's been in Brazilian, Italian, and Spanish Vogue they will have small articles about him that give his bio and credentials.  This are considered reliable sources.  But, please do start by reading the link that Mattisse gave, and I will copy this post to your talk page to discuss there.  --[[User:KP Botany|KP Botany]] ([[User talk:KP Botany|talk]]) 01:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

531282 +++$+++ TheCatalyst31 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531282 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-24 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.293254820E09 +++$+++ Adminship has been going well so far, thanks again for nominating me. I generally do take reasonable requests for unincorporated communities. I wrote the article on Gillingham for you and added the images, and I can probably do more of those in the future if you have images for them. I probably can't do any of the places in Michigan, unfortunately; another user usually merges stubs on Michigan communities to their corresponding townships. I don't agree with him on this, but we've discussed the matter and agreed to leave things the way they are. Articles with images might be okay, but I don't want to write a whole bunch of articles just to have them all get redirected. What's your experience been with Michigan articles? By the way, thanks for getting an image along [[Wisconsin Highway 131]]; I've needed an image for that ever since I got it promoted to GA status, but I wasn't able to take one.  +++$+++ Adminship has been going well so far, thanks again for nominating me. I generally do take reasonable requests for unincorporated communities. I wrote the article on Gillingham for you and added the images, and I can probably do more of those in the future if you have images for them. I probably can't do any of the places in Michigan, unfortunately; another user usually merges stubs on Michigan communities to their corresponding townships. I don't agree with him on this, but we've discussed the matter and agreed to leave things the way they are. Articles with images might be okay, but I don't want to write a whole bunch of articles just to have them all get redirected. What's your experience been with Michigan articles? By the way, thanks for getting an image along [[Wisconsin Highway 131]]; I've needed an image for that ever since I got it promoted to GA status, but I wasn't able to take one. [[User:TheCatalyst31|TheCatalyst31]] <sup>[[User talk:TheCatalyst31|Reaction]]•[[Special:Contributions/TheCatalyst31|Creation]]</sup> 21:27, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
531283 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531282 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.293321720E09 +++$+++ I consulted maps on the internet and my p.s. is wrong. The WIS 131 turn is about 1 block away. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::I consulted maps on the internet and my p.s. is wrong. The WIS 131 turn is about 1 block away. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 16:02, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
531284 +++$+++ TheCatalyst31 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531282 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.293334380E09 +++$+++ If you have a picture of the signage on WIS 131, that would be very useful; please upload it. The Michigan thing is annoying to me too; there's about 12 communities left in Michigan with post offices but without articles, and I'd like to finish them off, but I don't want to start the whole matter up again. Maybe I'll just write them anyway; a redirect is better than a redlink.  +++$+++ :::If you have a picture of the signage on WIS 131, that would be very useful; please upload it. The Michigan thing is annoying to me too; there's about 12 communities left in Michigan with post offices but without articles, and I'd like to finish them off, but I don't want to start the whole matter up again. Maybe I'll just write them anyway; a redirect is better than a redlink. [[User:TheCatalyst31|TheCatalyst31]] <sup>[[User talk:TheCatalyst31|Reaction]]•[[Special:Contributions/TheCatalyst31|Creation]]</sup> 19:33, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

6995 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-30 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312035060E09 +++$+++ Hi Brad, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review\/History_of_merit_badges_(Boy_Scouts_of_America)\/archive1&diff=442142305&oldid=442126021 you mention creating a bibliography and citing page numbers] for books used as a source multiple times. Can you show me an example, and I'll make it so?  Also, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=History_of_merit_badges_%28Boy_Scouts_of_America%29&action=historysubmit&diff=442164654&oldid=442144941 I've been providing more citations] for the article, but I'm not sure what you mean by \"some paragraphs without citations,\" which still need citations?  Content in the tables, or are they sufficiently sourced now?  I've got your talkpage watchlisted, so you can respond here.  Thanks!   +++$+++ Hi Brad, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/History_of_merit_badges_(Boy_Scouts_of_America)/archive1&diff=442142305&oldid=442126021 you mention creating a bibliography and citing page numbers] for books used as a source multiple times. Can you show me an example, and I'll make it so?  Also, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_merit_badges_%28Boy_Scouts_of_America%29&action=historysubmit&diff=442164654&oldid=442144941 I've been providing more citations] for the article, but I'm not sure what you mean by "some paragraphs without citations," which still need citations?  Content in the tables, or are they sufficiently sourced now?  I've got your talkpage watchlisted, so you can respond here.  Thanks!  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 07:11, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
6996 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6995 +++$+++ 6995 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.312081920E09 +++$+++ I intend to address the issues but can't for the next 12+ hours. I'd prefer that comments about the FAR stay on the FAR page rather than dragging them over here. Have patience.. It won't be delisted anytime soon.  +++$+++ :I intend to address the issues but can't for the next 12+ hours. I'd prefer that comments about the FAR stay on the FAR page rather than dragging them over here. Have patience.. It won't be delisted anytime soon. [[User:Brad101|Brad]] ([[User talk:Brad101#top|talk]]) 20:12, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
6997 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6995 +++$+++ 6996 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312083660E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  No worries, I totally understand the timeframe.  I was trying to take a full month-long wikibreak, but didn't quite manage it... :)   +++$+++ ::Thanks!  No worries, I totally understand the timeframe.  I was trying to take a full month-long wikibreak, but didn't quite manage it... :)  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 20:41, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
6998 +++$+++ 216.246.49.22 +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 6995 +++$+++ 6997 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.312135680E09 +++$+++ Responded to you here [[Talk:History_of_merit_badges_(Boy_Scouts_of_America)#Hillcourt_problem]] [[Special:Contributions\/216.246.49.22|216.246.49.22]] ( +++$+++ :::Responded to you here [[Talk:History_of_merit_badges_(Boy_Scouts_of_America)#Hillcourt_problem]] [[Special:Contributions/216.246.49.22|216.246.49.22]] ([[User talk:216.246.49.22|talk]]) 11:08, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

269140 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269140 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-13 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.231916700E09 +++$+++ Hey, I saw (from following Malleus' contribs to be frank) that I came up once or twice in your FRC. Pity as the most I've seen of you before was when you did the GA review of [[Panic of 1907]]. I had palnned on asking you to help and comment on [[The Lucy poems]], by far the most difficult article I have tackled; it was largely written by Ottava (we do fight but at the end of the day....) but we need input from a careful eye. Until I read the bits of the RfC, I had though we would get along, whatever, frankly I still think we would get likely along fine. I'm a bit prickly around the edges for sure, but ultimatly only interested in articles and compleatly and utterly uninterested in wiki-politics. Anyway the whole point of this is that when Lucy gets to GAR, and later FA, a reviewer like you would be pennys from heaven - (I'm asking for a favour here).  +++$+++ Hey, I saw (from following Malleus' contribs to be frank) that I came up once or twice in your FRC. Pity as the most I've seen of you before was when you did the GA review of [[Panic of 1907]]. I had palnned on asking you to help and comment on [[The Lucy poems]], by far the most difficult article I have tackled; it was largely written by Ottava (we do fight but at the end of the day....) but we need input from a careful eye. Until I read the bits of the RfC, I had though we would get along, whatever, frankly I still think we would get likely along fine. I'm a bit prickly around the edges for sure, but ultimatly only interested in articles and compleatly and utterly uninterested in wiki-politics. Anyway the whole point of this is that when Lucy gets to GAR, and later FA, a reviewer like you would be pennys from heaven - (I'm asking for a favour here). [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 23:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269141 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269140 +++$+++ 269140 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.231917240E09 +++$+++ I'm only interested in articles also. I don't do well in politics. It's when I get into political situations that I have problems, often because I have a low tolerance for cookies and fuzzy  chatter and get impatient.  There should be no problem between us, as I notice that you do seem to stay out of politics, so I could do copy editing for you. Let me know when. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I'm only interested in articles also. I don't do well in politics. It's when I get into political situations that I have problems, often because I have a low tolerance for cookies and fuzzy  chatter and get impatient.  There should be no problem between us, as I notice that you do seem to stay out of politics, so I could do copy editing for you. Let me know when. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269142 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269140 +++$+++ 269141 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.231918020E09 +++$+++ Great. You know how it is, the to do list gets longer and longer. 3 weeks. Not wanting to push my luck, but of course you would always be welcome to help with the [[The Raft of the Medusa]] FAC (cough!). Speak free on it, we want the best article we can get. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Great. You know how it is, the to do list gets longer and longer. 3 weeks. Not wanting to push my luck, but of course you would always be welcome to help with the [[The Raft of the Medusa]] FAC (cough!). Speak free on it, we want the best article we can get. Thanks. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 23:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

531286 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531286 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-29 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.293614040E09 +++$+++ Hello, I know you're busy with [[Alan Kulwicki]]; however, I wondered in the template above should be considered to be semi-protected. I believe that it should, even though its only transcluded on [[Sprint Cup Series]]. I don't believe we shouldn't allow someone unexperienced to mess with it. I can be very hard to fix if they do multiple edits. Remember when I asked you if you knew how to add the red square for Kentucky Speedway? (if I did) I used paint to add it. Or should we wait, and see if anyone would mess with it? '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Arial\"> +++$+++ Hello, I know you're busy with [[Alan Kulwicki]]; however, I wondered in the template above should be considered to be semi-protected. I believe that it should, even though its only transcluded on [[Sprint Cup Series]]. I don't believe we shouldn't allow someone unexperienced to mess with it. I can be very hard to fix if they do multiple edits. Remember when I asked you if you knew how to add the red square for Kentucky Speedway? (if I did) I used paint to add it. Or should we wait, and see if anyone would mess with it? '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Arial">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 01:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
531287 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531286 +++$+++ 531286 +++$+++ 2010-12-29 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.293616320E09 +++$+++ The reason to protect the other template was because they had high use. One use isn't justifiable. Vandalism can be reverted and well-intentioned changes with bad repercussions can be dealt with. I suggest adding it to your watchlist. Do you use watchlists? '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :The reason to protect the other template was because they had high use. One use isn't justifiable. Vandalism can be reverted and well-intentioned changes with bad repercussions can be dealt with. I suggest adding it to your watchlist. Do you use watchlists? '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 01:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
531288 +++$+++ Nascar1996 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ 531286 +++$+++ 531287 +++$+++ 2010-12-29 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.293619620E09 +++$+++ I added it to my watchlist. After I posted the comment, I noticed that I could have just added it to my watchlist. Uhh. '''<span style=\"border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Arial\"> +++$+++ ::I added it to my watchlist. After I posted the comment, I noticed that I could have just added it to my watchlist. Uhh. '''<span style="border: 2px #1234aa solid;background:silver;font-family: Arial">[[User:Nascar1996|<font color="black">Nascar</font>]][[User talk:Nascar1996|<font color="Red">1996 </font>]]</span>''' 02:47, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

115269 +++$+++ Wotapalaver +++$+++ David Edgar +++$+++ 115269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-07 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.207582320E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I may be wrong, but it seems you wrote the article on the Admiral's Cup.  The text of the page seems to be a verbatim copy of copyright text on http:\/\/www.solarnavigator.net\/events\/the_admirals_cup.htm  . Could you write the page with non-copyright text, or is there permission to use the text?  (Or did that website rip of WP content?)  +++$+++ Hi.  I may be wrong, but it seems you wrote the article on the Admiral's Cup.  The text of the page seems to be a verbatim copy of copyright text on http://www.solarnavigator.net/events/the_admirals_cup.htm  . Could you write the page with non-copyright text, or is there permission to use the text?  (Or did that website rip of WP content?) [[User:Wotapalaver|Wotapalaver]] ([[User talk:Wotapalaver|talk]]) 08:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
115270 +++$+++ David Edgar +++$+++ David Edgar +++$+++ 115269 +++$+++ 115269 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.207591680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pointing it out. I wonder if other pages on that site also use wikipedia content. (For example, http:\/\/www.solarnavigator.net\/geography\/london_england.htm includes a tell-tale line: \"Main article: History of London\" without any link.) -- +++$+++ :Thanks for pointing it out. I wonder if other pages on that site also use wikipedia content. (For example, http://www.solarnavigator.net/geography/london_england.htm includes a tell-tale line: "Main article: History of London" without any link.) --[[User:David Edgar|David Edgar]] ([[User talk:David Edgar#top|talk]]) 11:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

269144 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269144 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-15 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.232075040E09 +++$+++ Considering the article is unreferenced and asserts information that is untrue, using weasel wording, it may be [[WP:OR|original research]]. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ Considering the article is unreferenced and asserts information that is untrue, using weasel wording, it may be [[WP:OR|original research]]. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
269145 +++$+++ Piratejosh85 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269144 +++$+++ 269144 +++$+++ 2009-01-15 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.232079900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply.  I'll try to improve with your suggestions in mind  +++$+++ :Thanks for the reply.  I'll try to improve with your suggestions in mind [[User:Piratejosh85|Piratejosh85]] ([[User talk:Piratejosh85|talk]]) 20:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

7001 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Brad101 +++$+++ 7001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.312529220E09 +++$+++ Please stop by the discussion to see if your concerns have been addressed. --<sub style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Please stop by the discussion to see if your concerns have been addressed. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</sub> 00:27, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
7002 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7001 +++$+++ 7001 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.289053080E09 +++$+++ As to the AskArt.com question, it depends on the licensing you have with that website. I cannot give you legal advice, but Wikipedia requires any submission to be available for re-use anywhere (attribution is required) and that there not be much in the way of restrictions as to those submissions, in addition to the submitter in essence having authority over the copyright. The best way to do this is to use the [[WP:OTRS|OTRS system]] to prove you are the copyright holder of the material you want to submit. Hope that helps.  +++$+++ :As to the AskArt.com question, it depends on the licensing you have with that website. I cannot give you legal advice, but Wikipedia requires any submission to be available for re-use anywhere (attribution is required) and that there not be much in the way of restrictions as to those submissions, in addition to the submitter in essence having authority over the copyright. The best way to do this is to use the [[WP:OTRS|OTRS system]] to prove you are the copyright holder of the material you want to submit. Hope that helps. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 07:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
7003 +++$+++ BrianJohnsonXYZ +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7001 +++$+++ 7001 +++$+++ 2011-04-09 08:31:00 +++$+++ 1.302363060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:BrianJohnsonXYZ|BrianJohnsonXYZ]] ([[User talk:BrianJohnsonXYZ|talk]]) 08:31, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
7004 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7001 +++$+++ 7003 +++$+++ 2011-04-09 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.302402960E09 +++$+++ As to the relevance of this to John as to his father: First, it should likely be added to his father's bio. But, I think that if John came across the plains in a wagon train with slaves that living in close quarters with them and then living with them in Oregon might have an effect upon someone who later goes on to the career that he had. Maybe that's just me, but I would think it is very relevant (assuming of course this did happen, which seems to be in dispute).  +++$+++ :*As to the relevance of this to John as to his father: First, it should likely be added to his father's bio. But, I think that if John came across the plains in a wagon train with slaves that living in close quarters with them and then living with them in Oregon might have an effect upon someone who later goes on to the career that he had. Maybe that's just me, but I would think it is very relevant (assuming of course this did happen, which seems to be in dispute). [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 19:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

269146 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-12 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.231760880E09 +++$+++ I've added some generic examples to see if tactics and pitch conditions are more understandable. ''' +++$+++ I've added some generic examples to see if tactics and pitch conditions are more understandable. '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]''' (''[[User talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 03:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
269147 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269146 +++$+++ 269146 +++$+++ 2009-01-12 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.231748340E09 +++$+++ Anyway, feel free to provide me with feedback. I am willing to help you out any way I can.  Meanwhile, I will place the article on hold. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Anyway, feel free to provide me with feedback. I am willing to help you out any way I can.  Meanwhile, I will place the article on hold. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:19, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
269148 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269146 +++$+++ 269147 +++$+++ 2009-01-12 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.231754940E09 +++$+++ Noted, thanks for spotting the discontinuities and errors that I have made around the place. ''' +++$+++ ::Noted, thanks for spotting the discontinuities and errors that I have made around the place. '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 02:09, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
269149 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269146 +++$+++ 269148 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.231845240E09 +++$+++ I am ready to pass it as GA if you have looked through the changes I have made and they are OK with you.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::I am ready to pass it as GA if you have looked through the changes I have made and they are OK with you.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269150 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269146 +++$+++ 269149 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.231845360E09 +++$+++ It's great. Thanks for spending so many hours on it. ''' +++$+++ ::::It's great. Thanks for spending so many hours on it. '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]''' (''[[User talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 03:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269151 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269146 +++$+++ 269150 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.231849320E09 +++$+++ I'm surprised there are so few cricket GAs. This is only the 32nd! No wonder you are working on so many!  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I'm surprised there are so few cricket GAs. This is only the 32nd! No wonder you are working on so many!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:22, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

7005 +++$+++ BrianJohnsonXYZ +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-10 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.302463740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:BrianJohnsonXYZ|BrianJohnsonXYZ]] ([[User talk:BrianJohnsonXYZ|talk]]) 12:29, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
7006 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7005 +++$+++ 7005 +++$+++ 2011-04-10 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.302489900E09 +++$+++ Trust me, I know all about how misinformation can eventually become the information and how difficult it can be to get that corrected. But how Wikipedia works is we need what we call [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] preferably published in high quality sources, such as OHQ. Once you do that, it makes it far easier to get incorrect items corrected on Wikipedia. And how Wikipedia actually works is not how you describe, as I do not [[WP:OWN|own]] the article. But yes, as the original author, I do keep an eye on it to keep people from turning it into something Wikipedia is not, revert any vandalism, and as information comes along, expand it. But anyone else is free to do the same. Trust me, I would love more quality sources on the whole Waldo clan so that each of the three articles can be improved. As to sources showing Waldo brought slaves, have you reviewed Oregon's 1844 census (I think it is 1844, but it might have been 1845) that the [[Provisional Government of Oregon]] did? Th records are on microfilm at the state archives, which appears to be convenient for you, based on you working at WOU. Since I am out of law school at Willamette, it is no longer convenient for me to go back and see what those records say. Going forward though, it is probably best to have this discussion at the article's talk page.  +++$+++ :Trust me, I know all about how misinformation can eventually become the information and how difficult it can be to get that corrected. But how Wikipedia works is we need what we call [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] preferably published in high quality sources, such as OHQ. Once you do that, it makes it far easier to get incorrect items corrected on Wikipedia. And how Wikipedia actually works is not how you describe, as I do not [[WP:OWN|own]] the article. But yes, as the original author, I do keep an eye on it to keep people from turning it into something Wikipedia is not, revert any vandalism, and as information comes along, expand it. But anyone else is free to do the same. Trust me, I would love more quality sources on the whole Waldo clan so that each of the three articles can be improved. As to sources showing Waldo brought slaves, have you reviewed Oregon's 1844 census (I think it is 1844, but it might have been 1845) that the [[Provisional Government of Oregon]] did? Th records are on microfilm at the state archives, which appears to be convenient for you, based on you working at WOU. Since I am out of law school at Willamette, it is no longer convenient for me to go back and see what those records say. Going forward though, it is probably best to have this discussion at the article's talk page. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 19:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

269152 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-15 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.232019720E09 +++$+++ Yes I could always do with more copyeditors. Thanks again. ''' +++$+++ Yes I could always do with more copyeditors. Thanks again. '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 03:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
269153 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269152 +++$+++ 269152 +++$+++ 2009-01-15 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.232020500E09 +++$+++ I was looking through your list of article at GAN and I see you added a whole lot more. I will do at least one other, maybe more if I get the hang of cricket.  Too tired right now.  &mdash; +++$+++ : I was looking through your list of article at GAN and I see you added a whole lot more. I will do at least one other, maybe more if I get the hang of cricket.  Too tired right now.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

269154 +++$+++ PresN +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-13 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.231901460E09 +++$+++ I believe that I have addressed all of your GA concerns, and the article is ready for another look. --''' +++$+++ I believe that I have addressed all of your GA concerns, and the article is ready for another look. --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue">N</span>]]''' 18:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269155 +++$+++ PresN +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269154 +++$+++ 269154 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.231910400E09 +++$+++ And now a third look! --''' +++$+++ :And now a third look! --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue">N</span>]]''' 21:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
269156 +++$+++ Liontamer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269154 +++$+++ 269154 +++$+++ 2009-01-15 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.232076840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the \"Good article\" assessment of [[OverClocked ReMix]]! I put in some effort to improve it, but being only a casual editor, I'm glad [[User:PresN|<span style=\"color:green\">Pres<\/span>]] came along to fine tune things for the guidelines. I'm all about making the article the best it can be, so I suppose it's now onto improving it enough for an \"A\" grade down the line! Hopefully you'll check out the free music at OC ReMix sometime. Just posted out 1800th track there, and we've got more than [http:\/\/www.ocremix.org\/torrents\/ 100 hours] of free stuff across all genres. Maybe you'll find something you like. :-) But anyway, as the article hopefully continues to improve, I certainly hope I can ping you for your eagle eye, miss! Your criticisms definitely improved the quality of the article; thanks again! -  +++$+++ *Thanks for the "Good article" assessment of [[OverClocked ReMix]]! I put in some effort to improve it, but being only a casual editor, I'm glad [[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]] came along to fine tune things for the guidelines. I'm all about making the article the best it can be, so I suppose it's now onto improving it enough for an "A" grade down the line! Hopefully you'll check out the free music at OC ReMix sometime. Just posted out 1800th track there, and we've got more than [http://www.ocremix.org/torrents/ 100 hours] of free stuff across all genres. Maybe you'll find something you like. :-) But anyway, as the article hopefully continues to improve, I certainly hope I can ping you for your eagle eye, miss! Your criticisms definitely improved the quality of the article; thanks again! - [[User:Liontamer|Liontamer]] ([[User talk:Liontamer|talk]]) 19:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

7011 +++$+++ Magioladitis +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-01 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.291241100E09 +++$+++ Hi. Do you use some kind of program\/script to tag pages? I kinda corrected [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Nathan_Cole_Jr.&diff=prev&oldid=399921201 this one]. WPBiography is now a redirect of WikiProject Biography and {{para|priority}} is now deprecated. --  +++$+++ Hi. Do you use some kind of program/script to tag pages? I kinda corrected [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nathan_Cole_Jr.&diff=prev&oldid=399921201 this one]. WPBiography is now a redirect of WikiProject Biography and {{para|priority}} is now deprecated. -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 14:05, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
7012 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7011 +++$+++ 7011 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.292069160E09 +++$+++ Yes, I use a script. I've adjusted it so I can update either the old or the new. Swapping them out can be left to the bot.  +++$+++ :Yes, I use a script. I've adjusted it so I can update either the old or the new. Swapping them out can be left to the bot. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 04:06, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

7013 +++$+++ Sam.bellamy +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-02 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.291285380E09 +++$+++ Hi, I have added some references from the Oregonian and whatnot.  Is this the type of stuff you think needs to be referenced?  I assume so - let me know if you had something else in mind.-- +++$+++ Hi, I have added some references from the Oregonian and whatnot.  Is this the type of stuff you think needs to be referenced?  I assume so - let me know if you had something else in mind.--[[User:Sam.bellamy|Sam.bellamy]] ([[User talk:Sam.bellamy|talk]]) 02:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
7014 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7013 +++$+++ 7013 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.292069280E09 +++$+++ Yes, that is what is needed, which helps demonstrate [[WP:NOTE|notability]].  +++$+++ :Yes, that is what is needed, which helps demonstrate [[WP:NOTE|notability]]. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 04:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

567621 +++$+++ Juanita Hodges +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-23 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.187869440E09 +++$+++ Who is Kate McAuliffe?  She doesn't show up on google as someone famous. I don't think she's an administrator here. Was she someone at your school?  +++$+++ Who is Kate McAuliffe?  She doesn't show up on google as someone famous. I don't think she's an administrator here. Was she someone at your school? [[User:Juanita Hodges|Juanita Hodges]] 04:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
567622 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567621 +++$+++ 567621 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.187911080E09 +++$+++ Kate McAuliffe is a girl which some vandal is obsessed with so he used her name on Wikipedia to create massive sockpuppets on Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :Kate McAuliffe is a girl which some vandal is obsessed with so he used her name on Wikipedia to create massive sockpuppets on Wikipedia. [[User:NHRHS2010|<font color="red" face="papyrus">'''NHRHS2010'''</font>]][[User talk:NHRHS2010|<sup><small><font color= "black">''' Talk '''</font></small></sup>]] 16:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

7015 +++$+++ Fasach Nua +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-03 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.291386000E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for adding that contents, I am sure you will appreciate that the [[wp:burden]] is on you to provide [[wp:v|verifiable]] source that these are the notable residents of Tillamook, Oregon  +++$+++ Hi, thanks for adding that contents, I am sure you will appreciate that the [[wp:burden]] is on you to provide [[wp:v|verifiable]] source that these are the notable residents of Tillamook, Oregon [[User:Fasach Nua|Fasach Nua]] ([[User talk:Fasach Nua|talk]]) 06:20, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
7016 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7015 +++$+++ 7015 +++$+++ 2010-12-03 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.291386420E09 +++$+++ That's an interesting assertion you are making. Next time, use the {{cn}} tag. The list is not original research, it is just un-cited. And it is not that they are \"the notable residents\", as that is not exactly what these sections are for, it is that these are current\/former residents who themselves are notable (which is why blue linked people are usually required).  +++$+++ :That's an interesting assertion you are making. Next time, use the {{cn}} tag. The list is not original research, it is just un-cited. And it is not that they are "the notable residents", as that is not exactly what these sections are for, it is that these are current/former residents who themselves are notable (which is why blue linked people are usually required). [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 06:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

531304 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-16 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.197808080E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ -- [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 04:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
531305 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531304 +++$+++ 531304 +++$+++ 2007-12-19 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.198051380E09 +++$+++ Yay! Now I really should get onto expanding that article some more.  +++$+++ :Yay! Now I really should get onto expanding that article some more. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 00:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

7017 +++$+++ Apuldram +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-04 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.291489800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your helpful suggestions for improving this article +++$+++ Thanks for your helpful suggestions for improving this article[[User:Apuldram|Apuldram]] ([[User talk:Apuldram|talk]]) 11:10, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
7018 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7017 +++$+++ 7017 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.292069280E09 +++$+++ No problem.  +++$+++ :No problem. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 04:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

531306 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531306 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-28 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.198831440E09 +++$+++ Saw your comments at [[Frank Gardner (driver)]], don't think the bot is wrong. What's happened I think is another editor has decided that another Frank Gardner (a British journalist) is more deserving of the Frank Gardner page than the racing driver Frank Gardner and done a half-assed job of swapping them and not changed the around 100 or so now broken links. Recommend that it all gets restored to where it was yesterday. -- +++$+++ Saw your comments at [[Frank Gardner (driver)]], don't think the bot is wrong. What's happened I think is another editor has decided that another Frank Gardner (a British journalist) is more deserving of the Frank Gardner page than the racing driver Frank Gardner and done a half-assed job of swapping them and not changed the around 100 or so now broken links. Recommend that it all gets restored to where it was yesterday. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore|talk]]) 00:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
531307 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531306 +++$+++ 531306 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.198831860E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I thought it was unusual that the bot was wrong. Sounds like a good idea. :)  +++$+++ :Thank you, I thought it was unusual that the bot was wrong. Sounds like a good idea. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 00:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

7019 +++$+++ Epeefleche +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7019 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-05 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.291569960E09 +++$+++ Agree w\/your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Mohamed Osman Mohamud]], and I give you credit for trying to explain yourself more than once.-- +++$+++ Agree w/your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Osman Mohamud]], and I give you credit for trying to explain yourself more than once.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 09:26, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
7020 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7019 +++$+++ 7019 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.292069340E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Hopefully everyone can now get back to editing.  +++$+++ :Thanks. Hopefully everyone can now get back to editing. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 04:09, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

531308 +++$+++ Dan arndt +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-03 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.199376480E09 +++$+++ Your edits are a step forward on the article - have clarified the issue of the intended EP and added some additional references.  +++$+++ Your edits are a step forward on the article - have clarified the issue of the intended EP and added some additional references. [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 08:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
531309 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531308 +++$+++ 531308 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.199431200E09 +++$+++ Thanks Dan. I couldn't find info on the EP so I'm glad you've fixed that bit. :)  +++$+++ :Thanks Dan. I couldn't find info on the EP so I'm glad you've fixed that bit. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 23:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
531310 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531308 +++$+++ 531309 +++$+++ 2008-01-07 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.199778600E09 +++$+++ Hi. No, I don't work for Google. You can criticise Google all you like, I don't mind or particularly care; the only issue is that everything you add to the encyclopedia (particularly controversial stuff) needs to be sourced from a [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources|reliable source]]. You can add anything, as long as you can back it up. Also, if you check the history of that page, I haven't edited at all, let alone taken out anything you've added. My point was just to remind you to add a reference for your information (i.e. to help you improve the article). Also, please sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~) after your text - it will add an automatic signature. Hope that helps.  +++$+++ ::Hi. No, I don't work for Google. You can criticise Google all you like, I don't mind or particularly care; the only issue is that everything you add to the encyclopedia (particularly controversial stuff) needs to be sourced from a [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources|reliable source]]. You can add anything, as long as you can back it up. Also, if you check the history of that page, I haven't edited at all, let alone taken out anything you've added. My point was just to remind you to add a reference for your information (i.e. to help you improve the article). Also, please sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~) after your text - it will add an automatic signature. Hope that helps. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 23:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

7021 +++$+++ Another Believer +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-07 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.291773360E09 +++$+++ When you inform WikiProject members of the collaborations of the week via talk pages, do you have a bot distribute the newsletters or do you copy and paste on talk pages one at a time? Just trying to think of ways to round of the troops for the WikiProjects I am a member of. Thanks for your hard work. --<font color=\"navy\"> +++$+++ When you inform WikiProject members of the collaborations of the week via talk pages, do you have a bot distribute the newsletters or do you copy and paste on talk pages one at a time? Just trying to think of ways to round of the troops for the WikiProjects I am a member of. Thanks for your hard work. --<font color="navy">[[User:Another Believer|Another Believer]]</font> <sub>(<font color="cc6600">[[User talk:Another Believer|Talk]]</font>)</sub> 17:56, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
7022 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7021 +++$+++ 7021 +++$+++ 2010-12-08 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.291821060E09 +++$+++ Just copy and paste, though there is probably a script or bot out there.  +++$+++ :Just copy and paste, though there is probably a script or bot out there. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 07:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
7023 +++$+++ Another Believer +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7021 +++$+++ 7022 +++$+++ 2010-12-08 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.291856400E09 +++$+++ Thanks! --<font color=\"navy\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks! --<font color="navy">[[User:Another Believer|Another Believer]]</font> <sub>(<font color="cc6600">[[User talk:Another Believer|Talk]]</font>)</sub> 17:00, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

506518 +++$+++ Bmclaughlin9 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506518 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-14 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.297740180E09 +++$+++ I hope you are still minding the [[Alvin C. York]] page. You've been a critical voice in the past.  +++$+++ I hope you are still minding the [[Alvin C. York]] page. You've been a critical voice in the past. [[User:Bmclaughlin9|Bmclaughlin9]] ([[User talk:Bmclaughlin9|talk]]) 19:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
506519 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506518 +++$+++ 506518 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.297745580E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I have been working on getting WikiProject US and some related things like the portal, collaboration and Newsletter going again (several pothers users have been instrumental in that endeavor as well so I don't want to take credit for what they did) and that has taken a lot of my time but I am hoping to get back to working on the recipients pages soon. I'm glad to see you are working on that one. -- +++$+++ :Thanks. I have been working on getting WikiProject US and some related things like the portal, collaboration and Newsletter going again (several pothers users have been instrumental in that endeavor as well so I don't want to take credit for what they did) and that has taken a lot of my time but I am hoping to get back to working on the recipients pages soon. I'm glad to see you are working on that one. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 20:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

70066 +++$+++ Djwilms +++$+++ Djwilms +++$+++ 70066 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-13 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.226586660E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Djwilms|Djwilms]] ([[User talk:Djwilms#top|talk]]) 06:31, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
70067 +++$+++ PHG +++$+++ Djwilms +++$+++ 70066 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-14 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.226672940E09 +++$+++ I too would only redlink names which I think have a good chance of becoming articles in light of the notability of their subject. Redlinking also works as a soft request for an article creation. It is your redlink to [[L\xe9onard Charner]] that motivated me to right an article about him :) Cheers  +++$+++ ::I too would only redlink names which I think have a good chance of becoming articles in light of the notability of their subject. Redlinking also works as a soft request for an article creation. It is your redlink to [[Léonard Charner]] that motivated me to right an article about him :) Cheers [[User:PHG|PHG]] ([[User talk:PHG|talk]]) 06:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

7024 +++$+++ Valfontis +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-10 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.291996140E09 +++$+++ Enjoy. And find more stuff if you can, of course. Probably some in some train books, but that would involve a *gasp* actual library. Cheers!  +++$+++ Enjoy. And find more stuff if you can, of course. Probably some in some train books, but that would involve a *gasp* actual library. Cheers! [[User:Valfontis|Valfontis]] ([[User talk:Valfontis|talk]]) 07:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
7025 +++$+++ Valfontis +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7024 +++$+++ 7024 +++$+++ 2010-12-10 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.291999320E09 +++$+++ Here's mine: [[Waconda, Oregon]]. Your image is much better. The sun was in the wrong place so I couldn't get a good long shot. No no trespassing sign though--excellently creepy inside. Now we just need pics of the ones at [[Quinaby, Oregon|Quinaby]] and [[McCoy, Oregon|McCoy]]. Oh look, there's one in [http:\/\/boundless.uoregon.edu\/cdm4\/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=\/archpnw&CISOPTR=795&CISOBOX=1&REC=2 Donald] also.  +++$+++ :Here's mine: [[Waconda, Oregon]]. Your image is much better. The sun was in the wrong place so I couldn't get a good long shot. No no trespassing sign though--excellently creepy inside. Now we just need pics of the ones at [[Quinaby, Oregon|Quinaby]] and [[McCoy, Oregon|McCoy]]. Oh look, there's one in [http://boundless.uoregon.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/archpnw&CISOPTR=795&CISOBOX=1&REC=2 Donald] also. [[User:Valfontis|Valfontis]] ([[User talk:Valfontis|talk]]) 08:42, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
7026 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7024 +++$+++ 7025 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.292069760E09 +++$+++ Awesome, and welcome back whoever you are you mysterious stranger. I doubt there's too many other sources for Tonquin, though I'd really like to find some sources for the Tonquin scablands in that area. If I was still in Wilsonville I could easily get those. But now with a job, there's just not the time for many picture road trips or library visits. Anyway, I'm sure the Tonquin station is creepy inside, which probably led to a lot of teenagers hanging out, which likely led to all the graffiti (and maybe some teenage pregnancies), which likely led to the big no trespassing sign.  +++$+++ ::Awesome, and welcome back whoever you are you mysterious stranger. I doubt there's too many other sources for Tonquin, though I'd really like to find some sources for the Tonquin scablands in that area. If I was still in Wilsonville I could easily get those. But now with a job, there's just not the time for many picture road trips or library visits. Anyway, I'm sure the Tonquin station is creepy inside, which probably led to a lot of teenagers hanging out, which likely led to all the graffiti (and maybe some teenage pregnancies), which likely led to the big no trespassing sign. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 04:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

7027 +++$+++ Ng.j +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-10 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.292053320E09 +++$+++ I see you've done a lot of work on hospital-related articles, especially in Oregon. Perhaps you'd like to join us in improving the articles for hospitals in Oregon?  +++$+++ I see you've done a lot of work on hospital-related articles, especially in Oregon. Perhaps you'd like to join us in improving the articles for hospitals in Oregon? [[User:Ng.j|Ng.j]] ([[User talk:Ng.j|talk]]) 23:42, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
7028 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7027 +++$+++ 7027 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.292069820E09 +++$+++ I won't be joining the hospital project, but I will occasionally improve the Oregon ones.  +++$+++ :I won't be joining the hospital project, but I will occasionally improve the Oregon ones. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 04:17, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

269172 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269172 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-14 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.231998060E09 +++$+++ Hey, do you think you can check over [[Sacrifice (2008)]]? I'm going to nominate it for FAC shortly and want to make sure everything is not overlinked. Give your answer here for now because I'm in the process of working on little fixes while I read it one more time and don't want an edit conflict.-- +++$+++ Hey, do you think you can check over [[Sacrifice (2008)]]? I'm going to nominate it for FAC shortly and want to make sure everything is not overlinked. Give your answer here for now because I'm in the process of working on little fixes while I read it one more time and don't want an edit conflict.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 21:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
269173 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269172 +++$+++ 269172 +++$+++ 2009-01-14 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.232001480E09 +++$+++ OK, I can look over the article when ever you say it is time.   &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, I can look over the article when ever you say it is time.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
269174 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269172 +++$+++ 269173 +++$+++ 2009-01-14 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.232002080E09 +++$+++ I'm done.-- +++$+++ ::I'm done.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 22:48, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
269175 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269172 +++$+++ 269172 +++$+++ 2009-01-16 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.232153100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help with Sacrifice but I'm going to withdraw the nomination and retire for a bit.-- +++$+++ :Thanks for the help with Sacrifice but I'm going to withdraw the nomination and retire for a bit.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 16:45, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
269176 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269172 +++$+++ 269175 +++$+++ 2009-01-16 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.232153520E09 +++$+++ OK, let me know if and when you need more help. Have a good rest! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::OK, let me know if and when you need more help. Have a good rest! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
269177 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269172 +++$+++ 269172 +++$+++ 2009-01-16 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.232153640E09 +++$+++ Alright, I'll remember that. I could be back in a week or so. It determines how long it takes me to get stuff in real life fixed.-- +++$+++ :Alright, I'll remember that. I could be back in a week or so. It determines how long it takes me to get stuff in real life fixed.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 16:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

7031 +++$+++ Newfoundlander&Labradorian +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-24 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.293194460E09 +++$+++ You rated the page on [[Darin King]] a \"C\" and I was wondering if you had any tips to make it better? +++$+++ You rated the page on [[Darin King]] a "C" and I was wondering if you had any tips to make it better?[[User:Newfoundlander&Labradorian|Newfoundlander&Labradorian]] ([[User talk:Newfoundlander&Labradorian|talk]]) 04:41, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
7032 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7031 +++$+++ 7031 +++$+++ 2010-12-24 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.293199080E09 +++$+++ As it is, the article is well written and sourced. The problem is the coverage. The first roughly 18 years of this man's life is a single sentence. You need to, if possible, find more information such as when he was born, where did he go to school before college, and even when did he get married? This provides the complete picture of the subject. I know this information can be elusive, and often times only makes it into reliable sources once the obituary is written, but it is part of this person's story, and a biography without that information remains incomplete. An example I often give is my first article, [[David Hill (Oregon politician)|David Hill]]. That is the most complete published biography of Hill in the world, but at most it can only be a C class article (if even that) at this time because there is just no information on his early life, only some speculation and random tidbits, in that there is a fairly complete and in-depth treatment of his last ten years or so, but very little on his first 30 years. Hopefully that helps.  +++$+++ :As it is, the article is well written and sourced. The problem is the coverage. The first roughly 18 years of this man's life is a single sentence. You need to, if possible, find more information such as when he was born, where did he go to school before college, and even when did he get married? This provides the complete picture of the subject. I know this information can be elusive, and often times only makes it into reliable sources once the obituary is written, but it is part of this person's story, and a biography without that information remains incomplete. An example I often give is my first article, [[David Hill (Oregon politician)|David Hill]]. That is the most complete published biography of Hill in the world, but at most it can only be a C class article (if even that) at this time because there is just no information on his early life, only some speculation and random tidbits, in that there is a fairly complete and in-depth treatment of his last ten years or so, but very little on his first 30 years. Hopefully that helps. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 05:58, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

7033 +++$+++ 89.139.34.103 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7033 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-01 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.293921780E09 +++$+++ {{helpme-helped}} Sorry for my question. I tried to find without success the explanation: how to add a picture (image) to the article? Thank you in advance [[Special:Contributions\/89.139.34.103|89.139.34.103]] ( +++$+++ {{helpme-helped}} Sorry for my question. I tried to find without success the explanation: how to add a picture (image) to the article? Thank you in advance [[Special:Contributions/89.139.34.103|89.139.34.103]] ([[User talk:89.139.34.103|talk]]) 14:43, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
7034 +++$+++ Matthewrbowker  +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7033 +++$+++ 7033 +++$+++ 2011-01-01 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.293923580E09 +++$+++ I recommend starting at [[Help:Files]], as this page gives a good introduction on how to use files.  [[WP:Uploading images]] has good information about the upload process.  From there, [[WP:Picture tutorial]] has detailed information about adding images to articles.  ~  +++$+++ : I recommend starting at [[Help:Files]], as this page gives a good introduction on how to use files.  [[WP:Uploading images]] has good information about the upload process.  From there, [[WP:Picture tutorial]] has detailed information about adding images to articles.  ~ [[User:Matthewrbowker | <font color=#009900>Matthewrbowker</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Matthewrbowker | <font color=#0000aa>Say hi!</font>]]</sup> 15:13, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
7035 +++$+++ 109.186.51.33 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7033 +++$+++ 7034 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.294719780E09 +++$+++ Thank you for a moral and technical support. Unfortunately, it is seemed that I made problems for the article Pumpable Ice Technology which I try to improve. I was going to do the best but a result is dramatic. The article is under \u2039 The template below (Cleanup) is being considered for deletion. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus.\u203a Is it possible to improve situation? Or: to save it during several months when I'll rebuild this article. Thank you in advance[[Special:Contributions\/109.186.51.33|109.186.51.33]] ( +++$+++ ::Thank you for a moral and technical support. Unfortunately, it is seemed that I made problems for the article Pumpable Ice Technology which I try to improve. I was going to do the best but a result is dramatic. The article is under ‹ The template below (Cleanup) is being considered for deletion. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus.› Is it possible to improve situation? Or: to save it during several months when I'll rebuild this article. Thank you in advance[[Special:Contributions/109.186.51.33|109.186.51.33]] ([[User talk:109.186.51.33|talk]]) 20:23, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
7036 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7033 +++$+++ 7035 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 06:17:00 +++$+++ 1.294755420E09 +++$+++ First, in addition to the original advice, I believe you have to be a registered user in order to upload a picture. As to your new question, again, I would recommend signing up for an account, then you can have an admin move the article you are talking about into userspace where you can continue to work on it, assuming it is deleted (even if it is deleted, an admin can restore it into userspace).  +++$+++ :::First, in addition to the original advice, I believe you have to be a registered user in order to upload a picture. As to your new question, again, I would recommend signing up for an account, then you can have an admin move the article you are talking about into userspace where you can continue to work on it, assuming it is deleted (even if it is deleted, an admin can restore it into userspace). [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 06:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
7037 +++$+++ Swallow2011 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7033 +++$+++ 7036 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.297092960E09 +++$+++ Really, I thank you for your cooperation. I succeeded to upload images. I'll follow your recommendations to improve the article.  +++$+++ ::::Really, I thank you for your cooperation. I succeeded to upload images. I'll follow your recommendations to improve the article. [[User:Swallow2011|Swallow2011]] ([[User talk:Swallow2011|talk]]) 07:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

269178 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269178 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-16 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.232165340E09 +++$+++ Also, my understanding is that the allegation of a racist comment in a diff was made by Casliber, not SandyGeorgia. Have I missed something? Thanks, and sorry for bringing this reminder of the RfC to your talk page. '' +++$+++ Also, my understanding is that the allegation of a racist comment in a diff was made by Casliber, not SandyGeorgia. Have I missed something? Thanks, and sorry for bringing this reminder of the RfC to your talk page. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 20:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
269179 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269178 +++$+++ 269178 +++$+++ 2009-01-16 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.232166720E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I was confused by the page and thought Sandy had removed my comments. I mistakenly though she removed them, as she often removes my comments to another page in other situations. I am sorry. I have a hard time finding my way around that RFC page. My computer is too small, my connection too slow, or something.  As far as who made the racial accusations,  I assumed it was Sandy as it was over an article\/issue with which we were both involved and had interacted before.  I never had any involvement with Casliber prior to the MDD article, and I do not know how he got his information against me. However, so many of Casliber's accusations came from situations that involved Sandy, so he may have made the actual accusations. I don't know how he assembled information. Sandy apparently  looked through my every edit, back to May of 2006 when I started here.  I am confused as to who accused me of what. Sorry. &mdash; +++$+++ :Sorry, I was confused by the page and thought Sandy had removed my comments. I mistakenly though she removed them, as she often removes my comments to another page in other situations. I am sorry. I have a hard time finding my way around that RFC page. My computer is too small, my connection too slow, or something.  As far as who made the racial accusations,  I assumed it was Sandy as it was over an article/issue with which we were both involved and had interacted before.  I never had any involvement with Casliber prior to the MDD article, and I do not know how he got his information against me. However, so many of Casliber's accusations came from situations that involved Sandy, so he may have made the actual accusations. I don't know how he assembled information. Sandy apparently  looked through my every edit, back to May of 2006 when I started here.  I am confused as to who accused me of what. Sorry. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
269180 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269178 +++$+++ 269179 +++$+++ 2009-01-16 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.232171640E09 +++$+++ I have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_comment%2FMattisse_3&diff=264546495&oldid=264527266 restructured the section] to eliminate the duplication and (hopefully) clarify the chronology. I hope I did an okay job, and did not make any mistakes. If you have any objections to my change, feel free to revert or modify accordingly. '' +++$+++ ::I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_comment%2FMattisse_3&diff=264546495&oldid=264527266 restructured the section] to eliminate the duplication and (hopefully) clarify the chronology. I hope I did an okay job, and did not make any mistakes. If you have any objections to my change, feel free to revert or modify accordingly. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 21:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
269181 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269178 +++$+++ 269180 +++$+++ 2009-01-16 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.232171880E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much. I am not even going to look at it. I am sure your judgment is better than mine anyway, as to where it should go. I don't even want to think about it. Thank you so very much. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Thank you very much. I am not even going to look at it. I am sure your judgment is better than mine anyway, as to where it should go. I don't even want to think about it. Thank you so very much. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

569151 +++$+++ Darkspots +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569151 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.163336340E09 +++$+++ OK, I figured it out on my own, and I'm pretty sure that I did it correctly.  My aversion to editing someone else's comments in a discussion like that were hard to overcome, but I think everything is clear and correctly attributed. Cheers.  +++$+++ OK, I figured it out on my own, and I'm pretty sure that I did it correctly.  My aversion to editing someone else's comments in a discussion like that were hard to overcome, but I think everything is clear and correctly attributed. Cheers. [[User:Darkspots|Darkspots]] 04:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
569152 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569151 +++$+++ 569151 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.163357160E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I was performing admin tasks until 0300 GMT this morning, so I have only just woken up! I'm glad that you got to the bottom of your question, though.  I would look at the edit history of the discussion to see who said what and when, then go from there. Regards,  +++$+++ :Sorry, I was performing admin tasks until 0300 GMT this morning, so I have only just woken up! I'm glad that you got to the bottom of your question, though.  I would look at the edit history of the discussion to see who said what and when, then go from there. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 10:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

269183 +++$+++ Grahamec +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-17 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.232187360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing.  I don't know quite what you mean by \"removing templates\".  Cite templates are more or less required under [[WP:MOS]].  The article also contain geographical coordinate templates (which you can skip over while reading, but are uselful to some) and quote templates (which are also supported in MOS as a way of making quotes appear correctly).-- +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing.  I don't know quite what you mean by "removing templates".  Cite templates are more or less required under [[WP:MOS]].  The article also contain geographical coordinate templates (which you can skip over while reading, but are uselful to some) and quote templates (which are also supported in MOS as a way of making quotes appear correctly).--[[User:Grahamec|Grahame]] ([[User talk:Grahamec|talk]]) 02:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
269184 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269183 +++$+++ 269183 +++$+++ 2009-01-17 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.232187660E09 +++$+++ It's the geographical coordinates sprinkled through out that I find distracting. I have never seen a GA or FA article with those in the body of the text. I can get another opinion if you like, but I don't think that an article can pass with those embedded in the article body.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :It's the geographical coordinates sprinkled through out that I find distracting. I have never seen a GA or FA article with those in the body of the text. I can get another opinion if you like, but I don't think that an article can pass with those embedded in the article body.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
269185 +++$+++ Grahamec +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269183 +++$+++ 269184 +++$+++ 2009-01-17 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.232188140E09 +++$+++ Yes that's OK, I'll put them in footnotes.-- +++$+++ ::Yes that's OK, I'll put them in footnotes.--[[User:Grahamec|Grahame]] ([[User talk:Grahamec|talk]]) 02:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
269186 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269183 +++$+++ 269185 +++$+++ 2009-01-17 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.232188320E09 +++$+++ Great! Thanks, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Great! Thanks, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
269187 +++$+++ Grahamec +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269183 +++$+++ 269186 +++$+++ 2009-01-17 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.232188980E09 +++$+++ Is that better, or should I find a way of separating the coords from the cites?-- +++$+++ ::::Is that better, or should I find a way of separating the coords from the cites?--[[User:Grahamec|Grahame]] ([[User talk:Grahamec|talk]]) 02:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
269188 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269183 +++$+++ 269187 +++$+++ 2009-01-17 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.232190720E09 +++$+++ Too tired to answer more tonight. I have asked another editors opinion and tomorrow I should be able to give uou a full answer.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Too tired to answer more tonight. I have asked another editors opinion and tomorrow I should be able to give uou a full answer.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

7040 +++$+++ Newfoundlander&Labradorian +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-08 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.294484880E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Do you have any tips on the Kathy Dunderdale article to improve it?  +++$+++ Thank you. Do you have any tips on the Kathy Dunderdale article to improve it? [[User:Newfoundlander&Labradorian|Newfoundlander&Labradorian]] ([[User talk:Newfoundlander&Labradorian|talk]]) 03:08, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
7041 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7040 +++$+++ 7040 +++$+++ 2011-01-08 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.294498920E09 +++$+++ First, although possible, I find it hard to believe that not one of the sources does not have an author. Though if this is the case, you might want to try and find higher quality sources, as we give greater weight to those sources where someone puts their name to it. Then, there are some [[WP:OVERLINK]] issues (generally don't link to the same article in adjoining sections), MHA should be spelled out in the Infobox and where it is a section header, and it mentions she was home from university when she met her husband. Where did she attended, did she graduate, and if so what degree, and if not, why not (dates of attendance would be good too)? That is all I can think of after a quick browse.  +++$+++ :First, although possible, I find it hard to believe that not one of the sources does not have an author. Though if this is the case, you might want to try and find higher quality sources, as we give greater weight to those sources where someone puts their name to it. Then, there are some [[WP:OVERLINK]] issues (generally don't link to the same article in adjoining sections), MHA should be spelled out in the Infobox and where it is a section header, and it mentions she was home from university when she met her husband. Where did she attended, did she graduate, and if so what degree, and if not, why not (dates of attendance would be good too)? That is all I can think of after a quick browse. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 07:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
7042 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7040 +++$+++ 7040 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.295006820E09 +++$+++ I will see if I have time, but the likely reason you failed is that you are likely a new user. You need to get a few edits and a couple weeks under your belt before the system will let you upload images.  +++$+++ :I will see if I have time, but the likely reason you failed is that you are likely a new user. You need to get a few edits and a couple weeks under your belt before the system will let you upload images. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 04:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
7043 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7040 +++$+++ 7042 +++$+++ 2011-01-15 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.295106300E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ ::Done. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 07:45, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

531331 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-10 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.199959200E09 +++$+++ Excellent! Thanks Tariqabjotu. Now I can move onto doing something less frustrating.  +++$+++ Excellent! Thanks Tariqabjotu. Now I can move onto doing something less frustrating. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
531332 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531331 +++$+++ 531331 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.199959560E09 +++$+++ Sounds like you're in good shape with the range block.  Let me know if you have further difficulties.  +++$+++ :Sounds like you're in good shape with the range block.  Let me know if you have further difficulties. [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 02:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
531333 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531331 +++$+++ 531332 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.199960100E09 +++$+++ You can request a range block of an active vandal on [[WP:AIV]] or [[WP:ANI]], those are pretty good avenues for fast help.   +++$+++ ::You can request a range block of an active vandal on [[WP:AIV]] or [[WP:ANI]], those are pretty good avenues for fast help.  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 02:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

7044 +++$+++ Quiiiz +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-14 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.295004180E09 +++$+++ Hello!  I've  noticed you added some biography pages to the Category: Technical University of Lisbon Alumni. Some of those are about people who studied in schools before those schools were gathered in that University in the 1930\xb4s, like Instituto Superior T\xe9cnico de Lisboa did...  is it correct to put them in this cathegory?  Formaly, that wasn't the name of the school yet.  Greetings +++$+++ Hello!  I've  noticed you added some biography pages to the Category: Technical University of Lisbon Alumni. Some of those are about people who studied in schools before those schools were gathered in that University in the 1930´s, like Instituto Superior Técnico de Lisboa did...  is it correct to put them in this cathegory?  Formaly, that wasn't the name of the school yet.  Greetings[[User:Quiiiz|Quiiiz]] ([[User talk:Quiiiz|talk]]) 03:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
7045 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7044 +++$+++ 7044 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.295006760E09 +++$+++ Generally that is correct. As long as there is continuity between the entities, we will put them in the current name of the institution, even if it is a new name, or as here, the schools were combined into a new entity. If there are enough graduates of the individual schools, the alumni category could be split into more categories for alumni of each component school. See [[:Category:Harvard University alumni|here for an example]].  +++$+++ :Generally that is correct. As long as there is continuity between the entities, we will put them in the current name of the institution, even if it is a new name, or as here, the schools were combined into a new entity. If there are enough graduates of the individual schools, the alumni category could be split into more categories for alumni of each component school. See [[:Category:Harvard University alumni|here for an example]]. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 04:06, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
7046 +++$+++ Quiiiz +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7044 +++$+++ 7045 +++$+++ 2011-01-15 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.295083620E09 +++$+++ Hello! Understood. In that case we have some other pages to add to that category. Greetings +++$+++ ::Hello! Understood. In that case we have some other pages to add to that category. Greetings[[User:Quiiiz|Quiiiz]] ([[User talk:Quiiiz|talk]]) 01:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
7047 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7044 +++$+++ 7046 +++$+++ 2011-01-15 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.295106420E09 +++$+++ Feel free to add the others. I only added those in the alumni lists or those whose article linked to the main school article.  +++$+++ :::Feel free to add the others. I only added those in the alumni lists or those whose article linked to the main school article. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 07:47, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

269189 +++$+++ Andrew Lancaster +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269189 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-16 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.232173380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your further explanation.-- +++$+++ Thanks for your further explanation.--[[User:Andrew Lancaster|Andrew Lancaster]] ([[User talk:Andrew Lancaster|talk]]) 22:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
269190 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269189 +++$+++ 269189 +++$+++ 2009-01-16 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.232175300E09 +++$+++ For a topic like [[wonder (emotion)]] from a psychological point of view, I probably would start by looking at the research on wonder as an emotion. If you are looking at [[wonder (emotion)]] from a philosophical view, then perhaps you would start with the consensus view of wonder in the discipline of philosophy, perhaps the history of the development of the view, etc.  (Not being a philosopher, I don't know exactly how to write an article on '''[[philosophy]]''', but would  look at the article on philosophy to get ideas.) Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :For a topic like [[wonder (emotion)]] from a psychological point of view, I probably would start by looking at the research on wonder as an emotion. If you are looking at [[wonder (emotion)]] from a philosophical view, then perhaps you would start with the consensus view of wonder in the discipline of philosophy, perhaps the history of the development of the view, etc.  (Not being a philosopher, I don't know exactly how to write an article on '''[[philosophy]]''', but would  look at the article on philosophy to get ideas.) Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
269191 +++$+++ Andrew Lancaster +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269189 +++$+++ 269190 +++$+++ 2009-01-16 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.232176800E09 +++$+++ I did not mean to defend any of the URLs. I am looking at the places where you placed the templates, which are mainly places were it seems to me that a quotations are being made which name their source very precisely. What is wrong with the example I quoted for example?-- +++$+++ ::I did not mean to defend any of the URLs. I am looking at the places where you placed the templates, which are mainly places were it seems to me that a quotations are being made which name their source very precisely. What is wrong with the example I quoted for example?--[[User:Andrew Lancaster|Andrew Lancaster]] ([[User talk:Andrew Lancaster|talk]]) 23:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
269192 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269189 +++$+++ 269191 +++$+++ 2009-01-16 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.232177400E09 +++$+++ As it says in the wikipedia policies and guidelines that I referenced above, the point of giving a reference is so the reader can go to that book, that page and see if the reference is correct. Without knowing what edition, what publisher, what page number, the reader cannot do that. However, I mostly was reacting to the article as a whole, so if you want me to remove the tag from the blockquote, I am certainly willing to do so. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::As it says in the wikipedia policies and guidelines that I referenced above, the point of giving a reference is so the reader can go to that book, that page and see if the reference is correct. Without knowing what edition, what publisher, what page number, the reader cannot do that. However, I mostly was reacting to the article as a whole, so if you want me to remove the tag from the blockquote, I am certainly willing to do so. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:30, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
269193 +++$+++ Andrew Lancaster +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269189 +++$+++ 269192 +++$+++ 2009-01-17 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.232209080E09 +++$+++ I'd suggest indeed that any template you feel does not need to be there should not be there. I believe that the norm for \"classical\" works, works that appear in hundreds of editions (though in some cases none might be in print anymore) is to cite in the way mentioned above. Citing right down to paragraph level is of course more accurate than citing down to page number? If any doubt remains then I'd suggest placing a hyperlink to a web edition. It takes a few more seconds that placing a template, but one action improves Wikipedia and the other makes it worse. Concerning the OR concern, can you post something on the talkpage? How can an article made up largely of direct quotes be OR? You must have something specific in mind?-- +++$+++ ::::I'd suggest indeed that any template you feel does not need to be there should not be there. I believe that the norm for "classical" works, works that appear in hundreds of editions (though in some cases none might be in print anymore) is to cite in the way mentioned above. Citing right down to paragraph level is of course more accurate than citing down to page number? If any doubt remains then I'd suggest placing a hyperlink to a web edition. It takes a few more seconds that placing a template, but one action improves Wikipedia and the other makes it worse. Concerning the OR concern, can you post something on the talkpage? How can an article made up largely of direct quotes be OR? You must have something specific in mind?--[[User:Andrew Lancaster|Andrew Lancaster]] ([[User talk:Andrew Lancaster|talk]]) 08:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
269194 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269189 +++$+++ 269193 +++$+++ 2009-01-17 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.232251920E09 +++$+++ I did put a note on the article talk page about my concern regarding [[WP:SYN]].  Regards &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I did put a note on the article talk page about my concern regarding [[WP:SYN]].  Regards &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
269195 +++$+++ Andrew Lancaster +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269189 +++$+++ 269194 +++$+++ 2009-01-17 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.232260200E09 +++$+++ Great! Thanks! I can't promise to work on this article again quickly, but placing such a note might help get any concerns fixed up. I think it is a short article that will remain short, but it can certainly be tightened up.-- +++$+++ ::::::Great! Thanks! I can't promise to work on this article again quickly, but placing such a note might help get any concerns fixed up. I think it is a short article that will remain short, but it can certainly be tightened up.--[[User:Andrew Lancaster|Andrew Lancaster]] ([[User talk:Andrew Lancaster|talk]]) 22:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

531334 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-11 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.200042840E09 +++$+++ Lovely work and thanks.  Now all we need is a current day photo which shouldn't be too hard (in theory) as lots of ppl go down that way.  I'll leave a note at [[WT:WA]] if you like.  I reckon it'd be DYK-worthy. &mdash; +++$+++ Lovely work and thanks.  Now all we need is a current day photo which shouldn't be too hard (in theory) as lots of ppl go down that way.  I'll leave a note at [[WT:WA]] if you like.  I reckon it'd be DYK-worthy. &mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 01:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
531335 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531334 +++$+++ 531334 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.200046560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding it to [[WT:WA]]; I haven't seen that page before. I think it's too late for DYK, since I wrote it on 31 December (and unfortunately only investigated the rules for DYK a few days ago). The only photo I know I have of Fonty's Pool is one of me and a whole bunch of family members as kids lined up along the diving board - although funny, it's not really suitable for an encyclopedia. :)  +++$+++ :Thanks for adding it to [[WT:WA]]; I haven't seen that page before. I think it's too late for DYK, since I wrote it on 31 December (and unfortunately only investigated the rules for DYK a few days ago). The only photo I know I have of Fonty's Pool is one of me and a whole bunch of family members as kids lined up along the diving board - although funny, it's not really suitable for an encyclopedia. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
531336 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531334 +++$+++ 531335 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.200050220E09 +++$+++ Not to worry. &mdash; +++$+++ ::Not to worry. &mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 03:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
531337 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531334 +++$+++ 531334 +++$+++ 2008-01-13 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.200218160E09 +++$+++ Australians don't drink [[Foster's Lager|Fosters]], it's a myth. There's info in the article about the beers we do actually drink. :) Don't forget to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~), and welcome to Wikipedia!  +++$+++ :Australians don't drink [[Foster's Lager|Fosters]], it's a myth. There's info in the article about the beers we do actually drink. :) Don't forget to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~), and welcome to Wikipedia! [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 01:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

569153 +++$+++ Seraphimblade +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569153 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.163358900E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I did attempt to discuss the matter civilly, and was met with some quite rude comments. I will continue to try to do so, if you have any suggestions please let me know.  +++$+++ Thanks. I did attempt to discuss the matter civilly, and was met with some quite rude comments. I will continue to try to do so, if you have any suggestions please let me know. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] 11:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
569154 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569153 +++$+++ 569153 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.163359260E09 +++$+++ Yes, looking at  +++$+++ :Yes, looking at [[User:Waiting4|Waiting4's]] Talk page history, they have removed quite a few warnings and a block message.  You did the right thing about bringing it to admin attention.  Just remember [[WP:3RR|the three revert rule]] and be careful not to cross it when reinstating speedy tags.  This stops petty edit wars and tit-for-tat arguments about content. You don't cross it when reverting vandalism, though. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 11:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

7050 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-15 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.295100120E09 +++$+++ }}  [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 06:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ }}  [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 06:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
7051 +++$+++ EncMstr +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7050 +++$+++ 7050 +++$+++ 2011-01-15 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.295155740E09 +++$+++ Chiming in here.  This discussion would be best at the article's talk page.  Please continue at [[talk:Horace Baker Log Cabin]].  Thanks, \u2014 +++$+++ :Chiming in here.  This discussion would be best at the article's talk page.  Please continue at [[talk:Horace Baker Log Cabin]].  Thanks, —[[user:EncMstr|EncMstr]] ([[user talk:EncMstr|talk]]) 21:29, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

531339 +++$+++ Corvus cornix +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-14 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.200302040E09 +++$+++ I removed the nonsense tag from [[On-beat dance roller skating]] because it isn't really nonsense, but I did put an afd tag on it for discussion.  <font face=\"Comic Sans\"> +++$+++ I removed the nonsense tag from [[On-beat dance roller skating]] because it isn't really nonsense, but I did put an afd tag on it for discussion.  <font face="Comic Sans">[[User:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:green">Corvus cornix</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:Dark Green">talk</span>]]''</sub></font> 01:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
531340 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531339 +++$+++ 531339 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.200302220E09 +++$+++ I agree, I wasn't really sure what to do with it. Thanks!  +++$+++ :I agree, I wasn't really sure what to do with it. Thanks! [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 01:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

7052 +++$+++ Jager008 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7052 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-17 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.295281500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Jager008|Jager008]] ([[User talk:Jager008|talk]]) 08:25, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
7053 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7052 +++$+++ 7052 +++$+++ 2011-01-17 08:47:00 +++$+++ 1.295282820E09 +++$+++ As to #1, yes, feel free to improve the article while it is at Articles for Deletion. I would however focus just on it, and not on linking other articles to it until the AfD process is complete in a few days. As to #2, the note at the top of the article about few or no other articles linking to it is solely about other Wikipedia articles linking to it. After the AfD is done, see if there are other articles in Wikipedia that should be linked to this article. For more info on this, click on the link in the notice on the article's page. Happy editing.  +++$+++ :As to #1, yes, feel free to improve the article while it is at Articles for Deletion. I would however focus just on it, and not on linking other articles to it until the AfD process is complete in a few days. As to #2, the note at the top of the article about few or no other articles linking to it is solely about other Wikipedia articles linking to it. After the AfD is done, see if there are other articles in Wikipedia that should be linked to this article. For more info on this, click on the link in the notice on the article's page. Happy editing. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 08:47, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

531341 +++$+++ Allstarecho +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-15 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.200394560E09 +++$+++ When you warn someone, start with at least the Caution warning. Otherwise there will be insufficient warnings for a block.  +++$+++ When you warn someone, start with at least the Caution warning. Otherwise there will be insufficient warnings for a block. [[User:Allstarecho|<strong style="color:#fff;background:#DC143C;border:1px solid #000;font-family:Verdana ">ALLSTAR</strong>]][[User talk:Allstarecho|<strong style="color:#FFF;background:#0F4D92;border:1px solid #000"><small>echo</small></strong>]] 02:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
531342 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531341 +++$+++ 531341 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.200394920E09 +++$+++ Thanks, have replied on your talk page.  +++$+++ :Thanks, have replied on your talk page. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
531343 +++$+++ Allstarecho +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531341 +++$+++ 531342 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.200394920E09 +++$+++ Are you using Twinkle?  +++$+++ ::Are you using Twinkle? [[User:Allstarecho|<strong style="color:#fff;background:#DC143C;border:1px solid #000;font-family:Verdana ">ALLSTAR</strong>]][[User talk:Allstarecho|<strong style="color:#FFF;background:#0F4D92;border:1px solid #000"><small>echo</small></strong>]] 03:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
531344 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531341 +++$+++ 531343 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.200395040E09 +++$+++ Nope, copying and pasting [[WP:TT|template messages]].  +++$+++ :::Nope, copying and pasting [[WP:TT|template messages]]. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
531345 +++$+++ Allstarecho +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531341 +++$+++ 531344 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.200395220E09 +++$+++ If it's a user that has never been warned before, it's good practice to at least warn first with level 2. Admins frown upon less than 3 warnings so starting at 2 then 3 then 4 is 3 warnings so on the 4th violation you can reasonably request a block without actually having to issue a 4th warning.  +++$+++ ::::If it's a user that has never been warned before, it's good practice to at least warn first with level 2. Admins frown upon less than 3 warnings so starting at 2 then 3 then 4 is 3 warnings so on the 4th violation you can reasonably request a block without actually having to issue a 4th warning. [[User:Allstarecho|<strong style="color:#fff;background:#DC143C;border:1px solid #000;font-family:Verdana ">ALLSTAR</strong>]][[User talk:Allstarecho|<strong style="color:#FFF;background:#0F4D92;border:1px solid #000"><small>echo</small></strong>]] 03:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
531346 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531341 +++$+++ 531345 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.200395340E09 +++$+++ Will do, thanks for letting me know. :)  +++$+++ :::::Will do, thanks for letting me know. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

7055 +++$+++ Wikidea +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7055 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-17 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.295304300E09 +++$+++ Hello Aboutmovies, I appreciate all the updating work you're doing on these case pages, but can you stop removing links to case pages, please? The reason they are there is so that they will be created - and that's useful. At the very least they can be put in another section, that isn't see also, but they should not be deleted, and I would be grateful if you could revert the deletions you've made. '''<font color=\"red\">[[User:Wikidea|Wik]]<\/font><font color=\"gold\"> +++$+++ Hello Aboutmovies, I appreciate all the updating work you're doing on these case pages, but can you stop removing links to case pages, please? The reason they are there is so that they will be created - and that's useful. At the very least they can be put in another section, that isn't see also, but they should not be deleted, and I would be grateful if you could revert the deletions you've made. '''<font color="red">[[User:Wikidea|Wik]]</font><font color="gold">[[User:Wikidea|idea]]</font>''' 14:45, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
7056 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7055 +++$+++ 7055 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.295342700E09 +++$+++ I fully agree that redlinks can be useful, and I often leave them in pages just so people understand that Wikipedia is not complete. But the ones I leave in are in compliance with [[WP:REDLINK]] and the [[WP:MOS]]. Red links serve absolutely no purpose in a see also section, nor do links to articles already linked to in the rest of the article, as covered by [[WP:SEEALSO]] (part of the MOS). This is because the see also section is specifically (as covered by its title) for links to other articles no covered in the rest of the article, but in order for the see also to fulfill its purpose, there ''must'' be an article. For what the see also section has been used for in most of those cases is not what consensus has directed us to (consensus being the MOS). If you want to change it to \"Related cases\" or move those redlinks out, feel free to, but I will not be doing so as frankly I didn't create the mess, and I personally don't expect other people to clean up after the messes I create. Going forward, I will refrain from removing them from all those in the unassessed LAW que, but once that que is cleared out, anything new in there is fair game. I know this sounds ruff and gruff, but this has been a problem for a longtime in the UK law cases (that and the huge quotes of the decisions) and what is there is the problem, as those articles are not conforming to the MOS. I could understand if my edits were in contravention of established editing rules, but that is not the case, as consensus has long held that we don't have redlinks in see also sections.  +++$+++ :I fully agree that redlinks can be useful, and I often leave them in pages just so people understand that Wikipedia is not complete. But the ones I leave in are in compliance with [[WP:REDLINK]] and the [[WP:MOS]]. Red links serve absolutely no purpose in a see also section, nor do links to articles already linked to in the rest of the article, as covered by [[WP:SEEALSO]] (part of the MOS). This is because the see also section is specifically (as covered by its title) for links to other articles no covered in the rest of the article, but in order for the see also to fulfill its purpose, there ''must'' be an article. For what the see also section has been used for in most of those cases is not what consensus has directed us to (consensus being the MOS). If you want to change it to "Related cases" or move those redlinks out, feel free to, but I will not be doing so as frankly I didn't create the mess, and I personally don't expect other people to clean up after the messes I create. Going forward, I will refrain from removing them from all those in the unassessed LAW que, but once that que is cleared out, anything new in there is fair game. I know this sounds ruff and gruff, but this has been a problem for a longtime in the UK law cases (that and the huge quotes of the decisions) and what is there is the problem, as those articles are not conforming to the MOS. I could understand if my edits were in contravention of established editing rules, but that is not the case, as consensus has long held that we don't have redlinks in see also sections. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 01:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

7057 +++$+++ Orygun +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-22 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.295692020E09 +++$+++ Noticed you updated rating on [[John M. Drake]] article.  It was listed Wiki-Oregon [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Oregon\/Assessment#Requests for assessment|assessment request]] page for long time.  Just out of curiosity, did you find Drake article on assessment page or did you run across it in some way?  In any case, thanks for all the assessment you do!-- +++$+++ Noticed you updated rating on [[John M. Drake]] article.  It was listed Wiki-Oregon [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Oregon/Assessment#Requests for assessment|assessment request]] page for long time.  Just out of curiosity, did you find Drake article on assessment page or did you run across it in some way?  In any case, thanks for all the assessment you do!--[[User:Orygun|Orygun]] ([[User talk:Orygun|talk]]) 02:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
7058 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7057 +++$+++ 7057 +++$+++ 2011-01-22 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.295703480E09 +++$+++ I came across it when I was updating the DYKs at the Oregon Portal and saw that it was rated as a stub, and it clearly was not.  +++$+++ :I came across it when I was updating the DYKs at the Oregon Portal and saw that it was rated as a stub, and it clearly was not. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 05:38, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

7059 +++$+++ MetaCow +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-23 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.295824080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding the bold title and the 2 categories, but can you please explain your thoughts on the tone? I mean, can you give me a specific part or just the whole article?  +++$+++ Thanks for adding the bold title and the 2 categories, but can you please explain your thoughts on the tone? I mean, can you give me a specific part or just the whole article? [[User:MetaCow|MetaCow]] ([[User talk:MetaCow|talk]]) 15:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
7060 +++$+++ MetaCow +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7059 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.295860260E09 +++$+++ This did help, thanks. I`ll see what I can do about fixing this up tomorrow.  +++$+++ :: This did help, thanks. I`ll see what I can do about fixing this up tomorrow. [[User:MetaCow|MetaCow]] ([[User talk:MetaCow|talk]]) 01:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

269204 +++$+++ D.M.N. +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269204 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-18 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.232338860E09 +++$+++ How come you marked [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lockdown_(2008)&diff=264930271&oldid=264925561 this] good-faith edit as vandalism? All I see is a user fixing a few links which were redirects. That doesn't fall under vandalism whatsoever. I've undone your edit.  +++$+++ How come you marked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lockdown_(2008)&diff=264930271&oldid=264925561 this] good-faith edit as vandalism? All I see is a user fixing a few links which were redirects. That doesn't fall under vandalism whatsoever. I've undone your edit. [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 20:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
269205 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269204 +++$+++ 269204 +++$+++ 2009-01-18 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.232339400E09 +++$+++ Sorry! I self-reverted immediately, and got an edit conflict on your page when apologizing. I was too quick on the trigger. Totally unwarranted on my part. (I have edited that article a lot -- thought I saw vandalizm ) I am very sorry. (I see by the history that you reverted first so my self revert did not take.)   Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Sorry! I self-reverted immediately, and got an edit conflict on your page when apologizing. I was too quick on the trigger. Totally unwarranted on my part. (I have edited that article a lot -- thought I saw vandalizm ) I am very sorry. (I see by the history that you reverted first so my self revert did not take.)   Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

7061 +++$+++ Haiyizhu +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-24 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.295935680E09 +++$+++ Cheers -- +++$+++ Cheers --[[User:Haiyizhu|Haiyizhu]] ([[User talk:Haiyizhu|talk]]) 22:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
7062 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7061 +++$+++ 7061 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.296356520E09 +++$+++ I will answer your questions, but it might be a few more days.  +++$+++ :I will answer your questions, but it might be a few more days. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 19:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

269206 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-18 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.232347260E09 +++$+++ Look, I'm going to nominate Woodes Rogers for FAC.  Reason for this is we have the 300th anniversary of the rescue of Selkirk coming up, and I'm hoping to get this main page for that.  Time may be too short, but they can't hang me for trying.  I'd appreciate it if you'd hang with me through the FAC and keep working on the article.  This gives us the time to decide what we are gonna do about Wolters, I've got another ref coming in the mail that is cited in the German Wikipedia.-- +++$+++ Look, I'm going to nominate Woodes Rogers for FAC.  Reason for this is we have the 300th anniversary of the rescue of Selkirk coming up, and I'm hoping to get this main page for that.  Time may be too short, but they can't hang me for trying.  I'd appreciate it if you'd hang with me through the FAC and keep working on the article.  This gives us the time to decide what we are gonna do about Wolters, I've got another ref coming in the mail that is cited in the German Wikipedia.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 22:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
269207 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269206 +++$+++ 269206 +++$+++ 2009-01-18 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.232347380E09 +++$+++ I did pass it as GA and listed it. I will keep working on the article.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I did pass it as GA and listed it. I will keep working on the article.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
269208 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269206 +++$+++ 269207 +++$+++ 2009-01-18 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.232347560E09 +++$+++ I know, but it might be possible if we can push it to FA to get it on the main page fast.  The tercentenary of the rescue of Selkirk is next month.  Thanks!-- +++$+++ ::I know, but it might be possible if we can push it to FA to get it on the main page fast.  The tercentenary of the rescue of Selkirk is next month.  Thanks!--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 22:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
269209 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269206 +++$+++ 269208 +++$+++ 2009-01-18 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.232347680E09 +++$+++ Wow, that is a good date for the main page. Can it get through FAC that fast?  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Wow, that is a good date for the main page. Can it get through FAC that fast?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
269210 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269206 +++$+++ 269209 +++$+++ 2009-01-18 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.232347920E09 +++$+++ Maybe for the 14th, but we'd have to be lucky indeed-- +++$+++ ::::Maybe for the 14th, but we'd have to be lucky indeed--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 22:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

7063 +++$+++ Sadads +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7063 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-25 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.296028440E09 +++$+++ I saw you [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of recent edits|have been really active lately]] and I clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the [[WP:Online_Ambassadors]] program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador,  +++$+++ I saw you [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of recent edits|have been really active lately]] and I clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the [[WP:Online_Ambassadors]] program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 23:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
7064 +++$+++ EncMstr +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7063 +++$+++ 7063 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.296183300E09 +++$+++ Let me chime in that all of Aboutmovies edits that I have witnessed are an exemplary model of complying with [[WP:MOS|Wikipedia's Manual of Style]].  While it is true that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Thrustmaster&diff=410322992&oldid=410196758 the reversion] reintroduces a tag for cleanup, that is vastly superior to the excessive [[WP:EL|external links]] you introduced.  You also removed all signs of [[WP:NPOV|neutrality]] in coverage of Thrustmaster.  Aboutmovies will be along shortly to further explain, but I'm sure his reasoning will be solidly based on the [[WP:5P|Five Pillars]].  \u2014 +++$+++ :Let me chime in that all of Aboutmovies edits that I have witnessed are an exemplary model of complying with [[WP:MOS|Wikipedia's Manual of Style]].  While it is true that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thrustmaster&diff=410322992&oldid=410196758 the reversion] reintroduces a tag for cleanup, that is vastly superior to the excessive [[WP:EL|external links]] you introduced.  You also removed all signs of [[WP:NPOV|neutrality]] in coverage of Thrustmaster.  Aboutmovies will be along shortly to further explain, but I'm sure his reasoning will be solidly based on the [[WP:5P|Five Pillars]].  —[[user:EncMstr|EncMstr]] ([[user talk:EncMstr|talk]]) 18:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
7065 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7063 +++$+++ 7064 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.296316020E09 +++$+++ EncMstr pretty much covered it. As to COI, I had said likely, which was based on the removal of any criticisms - i.e. the whitewash job comment - and additions such as \"prestigious brands\". The article is pretty much crap either way, but at least it was not completely promotional and was slightly better in the way of being in compliance with the [[WP:MOS|manual of style]]. Feel free to re-edit the article and improve it, just don't go against [[WP:NPOV|our neutral point of view]] and please [[WP:V|cite your sources]] while refraining from introducing more [[WP:EL|external links]] into the body of the article. For [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to cite, try industry magazines or even the Portland Business Journal. Happy editing.  +++$+++ ::EncMstr pretty much covered it. As to COI, I had said likely, which was based on the removal of any criticisms - i.e. the whitewash job comment - and additions such as "prestigious brands". The article is pretty much crap either way, but at least it was not completely promotional and was slightly better in the way of being in compliance with the [[WP:MOS|manual of style]]. Feel free to re-edit the article and improve it, just don't go against [[WP:NPOV|our neutral point of view]] and please [[WP:V|cite your sources]] while refraining from introducing more [[WP:EL|external links]] into the body of the article. For [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to cite, try industry magazines or even the Portland Business Journal. Happy editing. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 07:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
7066 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7063 +++$+++ 7063 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.296356400E09 +++$+++ Basically, see [[WP:OR|what original research is]] and you will see a rather huge problem for you and your editing attempts. Then, as I said, the existing article is crap, so anything from you about how bad the original article was is completely pointless and a waste of mine, and your's, time (if you want to deal with those problems, tag items you think are defamation with a citation needed tag and see if anyone can come up with a citation for it, and if not remove the sentence after a month or so). If you want to work towards improving it, add information from reliable, published sources, which is covered at our NOT OPTIONAL core policy of [[WP:V|verifiability]]. Then do it using one of our other core guidelines, which again is not an optional one, of writing from a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. Once, and only until, you get those policies will you understand Wikipedia and how to edit articles. As to promotional, you wrote \"Thrustmaster flagships are\" and list out the products and add a bunch of external links to the company's website, which although that may not have been your intent, it comes across as promotional (again, the original article was flawed as well). Lastly, there were manual of style problems, as there was before, but we don't introduce more problems just because it was already crap.  +++$+++ :Basically, see [[WP:OR|what original research is]] and you will see a rather huge problem for you and your editing attempts. Then, as I said, the existing article is crap, so anything from you about how bad the original article was is completely pointless and a waste of mine, and your's, time (if you want to deal with those problems, tag items you think are defamation with a citation needed tag and see if anyone can come up with a citation for it, and if not remove the sentence after a month or so). If you want to work towards improving it, add information from reliable, published sources, which is covered at our NOT OPTIONAL core policy of [[WP:V|verifiability]]. Then do it using one of our other core guidelines, which again is not an optional one, of writing from a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. Once, and only until, you get those policies will you understand Wikipedia and how to edit articles. As to promotional, you wrote "Thrustmaster flagships are" and list out the products and add a bunch of external links to the company's website, which although that may not have been your intent, it comes across as promotional (again, the original article was flawed as well). Lastly, there were manual of style problems, as there was before, but we don't introduce more problems just because it was already crap. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 19:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

531354 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-05 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.202216400E09 +++$+++ I've blocked for a month. I also took the liberty of deleting his garbage from your user page history - I don't see any reason why you should have that crap hanging around. I was going to delete the crap from your user talk page history too, but it is interspersed with legit discussion, so I didn't bother.  +++$+++ I've blocked for a month. I also took the liberty of deleting his garbage from your user page history - I don't see any reason why you should have that crap hanging around. I was going to delete the crap from your user talk page history too, but it is interspersed with legit discussion, so I didn't bother. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 05:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
531355 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531354 +++$+++ 531354 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.202216520E09 +++$+++ Brilliant, thank you! :)  +++$+++ :Brilliant, thank you! :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 05:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

269211 +++$+++ Grahamec +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-19 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.232356680E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for constructive criticism.-- +++$+++ Thanks very much for constructive criticism.--[[User:Grahamec|Grahame]] ([[User talk:Grahamec|talk]]) 01:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
269212 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269211 +++$+++ 269211 +++$+++ 2009-01-19 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.232356800E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. You did a great job. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :You are very welcome. You did a great job. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

531356 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-05 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.202217000E09 +++$+++ Just FYI, the only way to delete revisions from a page is to delete the page entirely, then restore the revisions you want. That's why you talk page disappeared for a moment. I would be surprised if your friend is back in a month. You've got to be pretty disturbed to put \"start harassing Somno again\" on your calendar.  +++$+++ Just FYI, the only way to delete revisions from a page is to delete the page entirely, then restore the revisions you want. That's why you talk page disappeared for a moment. I would be surprised if your friend is back in a month. You've got to be pretty disturbed to put "start harassing Somno again" on your calendar. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 05:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
531357 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531356 +++$+++ 531356 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.202217180E09 +++$+++ Ah, that explains that. I don't know, someone making 5 edits to mainspace and 59 edits harassing me - that's pretty disturbed! :)  +++$+++ :Ah, that explains that. I don't know, someone making 5 edits to mainspace and 59 edits harassing me - that's pretty disturbed! :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 05:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
531358 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531356 +++$+++ 531357 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.202217480E09 +++$+++ I'd bet London to a brick we've been dealing with \"some punk kid\", not a disturbed adult. Now that he can't scrawl on your user page, he'll go back to scrawling on bus stops.  +++$+++ ::I'd bet London to a brick we've been dealing with "some punk kid", not a disturbed adult. Now that he can't scrawl on your user page, he'll go back to scrawling on bus stops. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 05:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
531359 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531356 +++$+++ 531358 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.202217720E09 +++$+++ Haha, I just imagined a kid scrawling \"Somno sucks\" on a bus stop.  +++$+++ :::Haha, I just imagined a kid scrawling "Somno sucks" on a bus stop. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 05:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

7071 +++$+++ Sbmeirow +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7071 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-07 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.297092060E09 +++$+++ Go ahead and cleanup [[Hillsboro]] how you want it. \u2022  +++$+++ Go ahead and cleanup [[Hillsboro]] how you want it. • [[User:Sbmeirow|<span style="color:#8D38C9;">Sbmeirow</span>]] • [[User talk:Sbmeirow|<span style="color:#8D38C9;White;">Talk</span>]] •  07:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
7072 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7071 +++$+++ 7071 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.297172280E09 +++$+++ It has been cleaned-up, but not how I want it, but in conformance with [[MOS:DAB|our guideline on disambiguation pages.]] Which means we leave red-linked entries, unless the only link to the red link is a dab page.  +++$+++ :It has been cleaned-up, but not how I want it, but in conformance with [[MOS:DAB|our guideline on disambiguation pages.]] Which means we leave red-linked entries, unless the only link to the red link is a dab page. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 05:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

88560 +++$+++ Gbeeker +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-19 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.124490180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Gbeeker|Gbeeker]] 15:23, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
88561 +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88560 +++$+++ 88560 +++$+++ 2005-08-19 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.124509800E09 +++$+++ Umm, you broke the link by adding \" shell\". The edit was unnecessary at the time when it was done, so I had rolled it back. Someone created that redirect in the meantime. -- +++$+++ :Umm, you broke the link by adding " shell". The edit was unnecessary at the time when it was done, so I had rolled it back. Someone created that redirect in the meantime. --[[User:Joy|Joy <small><small>&#91;shallot&#93;</small></small>]] 20:50, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
88562 +++$+++ Gbeeker +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88560 +++$+++ 88561 +++$+++ 2005-08-22 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.124770680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for replying. I actually removed the ' shell' to fix the redlink. I suspect that the redirect may have been in flux when you did the revert. No harm done, it all looks good now.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for replying. I actually removed the ' shell' to fix the redlink. I suspect that the redirect may have been in flux when you did the revert. No harm done, it all looks good now. [[User:Gbeeker|Gbeeker]] 21:18, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

531362 +++$+++ TennisProdigy +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531362 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.202902200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the Welcome!...Guess that's it. :)  +++$+++ Thanks for the Welcome!...Guess that's it. :) [[User:TennisProdigy|TennisProdigy]] ([[User talk:TennisProdigy|talk]]) 03:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
531363 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531362 +++$+++ 531362 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.202902860E09 +++$+++ No worries, happy to help! If you have any questions, let me know. :)  +++$+++ :No worries, happy to help! If you have any questions, let me know. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

7075 +++$+++ Cimmerian praetor +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7075 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-15 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.297788840E09 +++$+++ thank you for the assessments ([[Centre for Clinical Legal Education (Palack\xfd University, Faculty of Law)|1]], [[CME\/Lauder v. Czech Republic|2]]). Could you please re-assess [[Palack\xfd University of Olomouc]]? I spent quite some time working on that, and don't feel unbiased enough to do it myself. Thank you. +++$+++ thank you for the assessments ([[Centre for Clinical Legal Education (Palacký University, Faculty of Law)|1]], [[CME/Lauder v. Czech Republic|2]]). Could you please re-assess [[Palacký University of Olomouc]]? I spent quite some time working on that, and don't feel unbiased enough to do it myself. Thank you.[[User:Cimmerian praetor|Cimmerian praetor]] ([[User talk:Cimmerian praetor|talk]]) 08:54, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
7076 +++$+++ Cimmerian praetor +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7075 +++$+++ 7075 +++$+++ 2011-02-17 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.297960920E09 +++$+++ Thank you for re-assesing the page. Could you please give me a hint, what is in your view missing, to get the page to GA level? I would like to work on that further. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thank you for re-assesing the page. Could you please give me a hint, what is in your view missing, to get the page to GA level? I would like to work on that further. Thanks. [[User:Cimmerian praetor|Cimmerian praetor]] ([[User talk:Cimmerian praetor|talk]]) 08:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

7077 +++$+++ JimKillock +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-27 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.298798820E09 +++$+++ Hi there, thanks for rating [[Industrial Organisation and Development Act 1947]]. I wondered if you could give feedback as to what sort of improvements I should make? And I'll try to make them :) Thank you  +++$+++ Hi there, thanks for rating [[Industrial Organisation and Development Act 1947]]. I wondered if you could give feedback as to what sort of improvements I should make? And I'll try to make them :) Thank you [[User:JimKillock|Jim Killock]] [[User_talk:JimKillock|(talk)]] 01:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
7078 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7077 +++$+++ 7077 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.298820540E09 +++$+++ First, the [[WP:LEAD|lede needs to be expanded]]. Then, a good copy edit as some periods seem to be missing. More importantly though, you need more non-primary sources, such as journals, and not primary sources. The problem with such as reliance on primary sources is that it is far more likely to end up with [[WP:OR|original research]]. Lastly, and this ties into the last one, we don't usually have \"Conclusions\", as this should be an encyclopedia article and not an essay. As in there are no points to prove, and again, this would tend to lead to original research. What you have is a good start, but it needs refinement to get to the next level. Happy editing.  +++$+++ :First, the [[WP:LEAD|lede needs to be expanded]]. Then, a good copy edit as some periods seem to be missing. More importantly though, you need more non-primary sources, such as journals, and not primary sources. The problem with such as reliance on primary sources is that it is far more likely to end up with [[WP:OR|original research]]. Lastly, and this ties into the last one, we don't usually have "Conclusions", as this should be an encyclopedia article and not an essay. As in there are no points to prove, and again, this would tend to lead to original research. What you have is a good start, but it needs refinement to get to the next level. Happy editing. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 07:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
7079 +++$+++ JimKillock +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7077 +++$+++ 7078 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.298841960E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'll give it a go. I have one academic study on this and the Cotton Board, which you also rated, which gives more information about how and why it was enacted and how the Development Boards policy was pursued. But it's not often that people write about acts as \"units\" of history, especially once they are absorbed into a general body of powers, and used beyond the original intent, so I think think there is some inevitability in resorting to primary sources to see how an act has been deployed, particularly this, as it is an enabling act used in very disparate ways. Nevertheless I've tried to avoid the main original research problem which is including ''original'' \u201cfacts, allegations, ideas, and stories\u201d.   +++$+++ :: Thanks, I'll give it a go. I have one academic study on this and the Cotton Board, which you also rated, which gives more information about how and why it was enacted and how the Development Boards policy was pursued. But it's not often that people write about acts as "units" of history, especially once they are absorbed into a general body of powers, and used beyond the original intent, so I think think there is some inevitability in resorting to primary sources to see how an act has been deployed, particularly this, as it is an enabling act used in very disparate ways. Nevertheless I've tried to avoid the main original research problem which is including ''original'' “facts, allegations, ideas, and stories”.  [[User:JimKillock|Jim Killock]] [[User_talk:JimKillock|(talk)]] 13:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

269223 +++$+++ Classicfilms +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-19 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.232434560E09 +++$+++ (outdent) Thanks for tweaking the sentence as it is a bit awkward. The only problem with \"The film's influence was noted when...\" is that it is in the passive voice - I know that the use of the passive is up for debate in the WP but I try to avoid it when possible. Maybe we need to restructure the paragraph. Any other ideas? - +++$+++ (outdent) Thanks for tweaking the sentence as it is a bit awkward. The only problem with "The film's influence was noted when..." is that it is in the passive voice - I know that the use of the passive is up for debate in the WP but I try to avoid it when possible. Maybe we need to restructure the paragraph. Any other ideas? -[[User:Classicfilms|Classicfilms]] ([[User talk:Classicfilms|talk]]) 22:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
269224 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269223 +++$+++ 269223 +++$+++ 2009-01-19 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.232434800E09 +++$+++ I messed it up as I must have been looking at a unrefreshed version. I was going to put back what you suggested on the GA1 page: The suspension of the [[Field_hockey_in_India#Management|Indian Hockey Federation]] in April, 2008 emphasized the film's influence - is that ok?  &mdash; +++$+++ :I messed it up as I must have been looking at a unrefreshed version. I was going to put back what you suggested on the GA1 page: The suspension of the [[Field_hockey_in_India#Management|Indian Hockey Federation]] in April, 2008 emphasized the film's influence - is that ok?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
269225 +++$+++ Classicfilms +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269223 +++$+++ 269224 +++$+++ 2009-01-19 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.232435160E09 +++$+++ No problem - refresh is always a pain... sentence is fine... - +++$+++ ::No problem - refresh is always a pain... sentence is fine... -[[User:Classicfilms|Classicfilms]] ([[User talk:Classicfilms|talk]]) 23:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

7081 +++$+++ Student7 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-02 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.299103620E09 +++$+++ Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  +++$+++ Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. [[User:Student7|Student7]] ([[User talk:Student7|talk]]) 14:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
7082 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7081 +++$+++ 7081 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.299160080E09 +++$+++ And I care why? Plus, see [[WP:DTTR]], not to mention I already commented at the original deletion discussion.  +++$+++ :And I care why? Plus, see [[WP:DTTR]], not to mention I already commented at the original deletion discussion. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 05:48, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

269226 +++$+++ Classicfilms +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-19 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.232436720E09 +++$+++ (outdent) Hmmm. Lines up on my computer - the display probably varies from computer to computer. Thanks so much for the review! - +++$+++ (outdent) Hmmm. Lines up on my computer - the display probably varies from computer to computer. Thanks so much for the review! -[[User:Classicfilms|Classicfilms]] ([[User talk:Classicfilms|talk]]) 23:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
269227 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269226 +++$+++ 269226 +++$+++ 2009-01-19 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.232437200E09 +++$+++ Might depend on the browser. I use Firefox 3.0.4.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Might depend on the browser. I use Firefox 3.0.4.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
269228 +++$+++ Classicfilms +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269226 +++$+++ 269227 +++$+++ 2009-01-19 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.232437320E09 +++$+++ I'm using 3.0.5 - maybe you are right. Also, should I remove the link for the GA review discussion taking it to the article talk page? - +++$+++ ::I'm using 3.0.5 - maybe you are right. Also, should I remove the link for the GA review discussion taking it to the article talk page? -[[User:Classicfilms|Classicfilms]] ([[User talk:Classicfilms|talk]]) 23:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
269229 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269226 +++$+++ 269228 +++$+++ 2009-01-19 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.232437500E09 +++$+++ Don't remove link. There is a bot that goes around and puts it in the article history. Unless you know how to put it in the article history yourself.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Don't remove link. There is a bot that goes around and puts it in the article history. Unless you know how to put it in the article history yourself.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
269230 +++$+++ Classicfilms +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269226 +++$+++ 269229 +++$+++ 2009-01-19 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.232437560E09 +++$+++ Got it! Thanks - +++$+++ ::::Got it! Thanks -[[User:Classicfilms|Classicfilms]] ([[User talk:Classicfilms|talk]]) 23:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

569159 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163376360E09 +++$+++ I always wondered but I had forgot to ask, but was the misspelling of your name intentional? ''' +++$+++ I always wondered but I had forgot to ask, but was the misspelling of your name intentional? '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 16:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
569160 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569159 +++$+++ 569159 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.163390880E09 +++$+++ [[User_talk:%28aeropagitica%29\/Archive_13#Go_raibh_maith_agat.21|The story of my username]].  +++$+++ :[[User_talk:%28aeropagitica%29/Archive_13#Go_raibh_maith_agat.21|The story of my username]]. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 20:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
569161 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569159 +++$+++ 569160 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.163402160E09 +++$+++ Lol, okay, thanks for sharing the story. =) ''' +++$+++ ::Lol, okay, thanks for sharing the story. =) '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 23:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

531372 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531372 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-15 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.203073380E09 +++$+++ Just to save you time re the WA locality ones - we have a ref template for Landgate suburb histories. <nowiki>{{LandInfo WA|m|X|2008-02-15}}<\/nowiki> where X is the first letter of the suburb's name (m means metropolitan so you don't need to change this).  +++$+++ Just to save you time re the WA locality ones - we have a ref template for Landgate suburb histories. <nowiki>{{LandInfo WA|m|X|2008-02-15}}</nowiki> where X is the first letter of the suburb's name (m means metropolitan so you don't need to change this). [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 03:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
531373 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531372 +++$+++ 531372 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.203073560E09 +++$+++ I thought I'd seen something like that around but couldn't find it again! Thanks!  +++$+++ :I thought I'd seen something like that around but couldn't find it again! Thanks! [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
531374 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531372 +++$+++ 531373 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.203073800E09 +++$+++ No worries :) It has a nice generic name and a template because this department moves site regularly - 3 times in the last 3 years the department has changed name or branding (DLS -> DOLA -> DLI -> Landgate)  +++$+++ ::No worries :) It has a nice generic name and a template because this department moves site regularly - 3 times in the last 3 years the department has changed name or branding (DLS -> DOLA -> DLI -> Landgate) [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 03:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
531375 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531372 +++$+++ 531374 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.203073920E09 +++$+++ Makes sense. I think that's the same for most government departments!  +++$+++ :::Makes sense. I think that's the same for most government departments! [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
531376 +++$+++ Gnangarra +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531372 +++$+++ 531372 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.203081840E09 +++$+++ Good work with referencing though I'd be careful striking Quinten Lynch[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Western_Australia&diff=191583200&oldid=191567462 ] the AFL might give you a 2 week suspension, thought your lawyer could say mitigating circumstances since you struck Jeff first :)  +++$+++ *Good work with referencing though I'd be careful striking Quinten Lynch[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Western_Australia&diff=191583200&oldid=191567462 ] the AFL might give you a 2 week suspension, thought your lawyer could say mitigating circumstances since you struck Jeff first :) [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 05:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
531377 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531372 +++$+++ 531376 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.203084060E09 +++$+++ Oh well, to quote the written work of well-known philosopher Ben Cousins, \"such is life\". ;)  +++$+++ ::Oh well, to quote the written work of well-known philosopher Ben Cousins, "such is life". ;) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 06:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

7087 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-08 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.299591900E09 +++$+++ Hi, non-existent categories shouldn't be added to articles. I don't know if you're intending to create those categories or if you just didn't realise they were red links, but you've added a lot of non-existent cats to articles in the last few minutes.  +++$+++ Hi, non-existent categories shouldn't be added to articles. I don't know if you're intending to create those categories or if you just didn't realise they were red links, but you've added a lot of non-existent cats to articles in the last few minutes. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  05:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
7088 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7087 +++$+++ 7087 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 05:53:00 +++$+++ 1.299592380E09 +++$+++ OK, I'm going to have to try really hard not to dive into some serious personal attacks. But seeing as very few people have more edits than me on Wikipedia, I am going to have to go with I sort of know what I'm doing. You see, you can either add articles to non-existent categories and then start them that way, or you can start a cat without any articles, either way you run afoul of CAT, as you cannot have empty cats, nor can you have articles in non-existent cats. So in order for categories to get started, you have to go one way or the other. I personally don't care how people do it, and since I am a nice guy, I don't revert after a couple minutes. Instead, I go the prudent way and check out the contributor's contributions to see if there seems to be a theme - it's really easy, we have a nice link to user contributions it is on the left <-- that anyone can click on. Or I wait a a day to see if the editor is working on setting up the cat. But reverting after a few minutes is like doing CSD on a two-minute old article, which is frowned upon. But happy editing.  +++$+++ :OK, I'm going to have to try really hard not to dive into some serious personal attacks. But seeing as very few people have more edits than me on Wikipedia, I am going to have to go with I sort of know what I'm doing. You see, you can either add articles to non-existent categories and then start them that way, or you can start a cat without any articles, either way you run afoul of CAT, as you cannot have empty cats, nor can you have articles in non-existent cats. So in order for categories to get started, you have to go one way or the other. I personally don't care how people do it, and since I am a nice guy, I don't revert after a couple minutes. Instead, I go the prudent way and check out the contributor's contributions to see if there seems to be a theme - it's really easy, we have a nice link to user contributions it is on the left <-- that anyone can click on. Or I wait a a day to see if the editor is working on setting up the cat. But reverting after a few minutes is like doing CSD on a two-minute old article, which is frowned upon. But happy editing. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 05:53, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
7089 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7087 +++$+++ 7088 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.299593100E09 +++$+++ Personally, I would say that a cat that stays empty for a few minutes is a lot less unsightly than a cat that doesn't (yet) exist being added to dozens of articles. It might be a technical violation, but CSD C1 doesn't kick in until four days later, by which time the three-article minimum should easily be fulfilled. I don't know what I was supposed to learn from looking at your contribs other than that you've added a red-linked cat to lots of articles, but when I saw it on my watchlist, I just assumed that you weren't aware of the policy or hadn't realised the cat didn't (yet) exist, so I dropped you a line. I'm not sure why you'd have to try hard not to dive into personal attacks whn I've done nothing but assume good faith on your part.  +++$+++ ::Personally, I would say that a cat that stays empty for a few minutes is a lot less unsightly than a cat that doesn't (yet) exist being added to dozens of articles. It might be a technical violation, but CSD C1 doesn't kick in until four days later, by which time the three-article minimum should easily be fulfilled. I don't know what I was supposed to learn from looking at your contribs other than that you've added a red-linked cat to lots of articles, but when I saw it on my watchlist, I just assumed that you weren't aware of the policy or hadn't realised the cat didn't (yet) exist, so I dropped you a line. I'm not sure why you'd have to try hard not to dive into personal attacks whn I've done nothing but assume good faith on your part. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  06:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
7090 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7087 +++$+++ 7089 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.299594120E09 +++$+++ AFG would mean you not revert first as you did at some British actor's article. AFG would mean you wait 30 minutes and see what happens. And a whole lot of articles? At most 8 were red linked, and they all involved the same school - hint that means there is a pattern. And 8 would be a drop in the bucket compared to 90,000+ edits for me, or around 500 just this month. As to technical violation, yes it would only be a technical violation, but either way it is a technical violation to have an empty cat or to have redlinked cats, thus why one has to give. You have one preference, I have another, and they are compatible. But just like I am not going to correct your British grammar\/spelling to make it American, I would not force you to add redlinked cats to articles before starting your cats, which is my preference. FYI, CAT is not a policy, it is only a guideline, which makes it even more inane that you would not only revert someone, but then leave a message on their talk page. I mean, I could sort of understand if the editor had a redlinked user page, and no messages on their talk page or only templated warnings on their talk page, but seriously, did you not see all the messages and my extensive archives? There is a reason [[WP:DTTR]] exists (not that you used a template, but think of the general theme there). If I see someone is a rather experienced and active user I'm not going to go leave them message about WP:CAT unless I think they are doing something seriously wrong like violating BLP. But to each his own.  +++$+++ :::AFG would mean you not revert first as you did at some British actor's article. AFG would mean you wait 30 minutes and see what happens. And a whole lot of articles? At most 8 were red linked, and they all involved the same school - hint that means there is a pattern. And 8 would be a drop in the bucket compared to 90,000+ edits for me, or around 500 just this month. As to technical violation, yes it would only be a technical violation, but either way it is a technical violation to have an empty cat or to have redlinked cats, thus why one has to give. You have one preference, I have another, and they are compatible. But just like I am not going to correct your British grammar/spelling to make it American, I would not force you to add redlinked cats to articles before starting your cats, which is my preference. FYI, CAT is not a policy, it is only a guideline, which makes it even more inane that you would not only revert someone, but then leave a message on their talk page. I mean, I could sort of understand if the editor had a redlinked user page, and no messages on their talk page or only templated warnings on their talk page, but seriously, did you not see all the messages and my extensive archives? There is a reason [[WP:DTTR]] exists (not that you used a template, but think of the general theme there). If I see someone is a rather experienced and active user I'm not going to go leave them message about WP:CAT unless I think they are doing something seriously wrong like violating BLP. But to each his own. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 06:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

269233 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-21 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.232575980E09 +++$+++ Hi, [[User:Mattisse|<font color=\"navy\">'''Mattisse'''<\/font>]], I'm here to ask a really big favour. I've just issued a \"fail\" in the [[Talk:North Sea\/GA1 | GA review]] of [[North Sea]]. The editors have worked really hard, but they don't ''yet'' have the skills for such a big topic. I've left some advice at the end of the review. Since I know you're an experienced and helpful GA reviewer, I'd be grateful if you'd have a look and see if there's addtional advice you think would help these editors. -- +++$+++ Hi, [[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]], I'm here to ask a really big favour. I've just issued a "fail" in the [[Talk:North Sea/GA1 | GA review]] of [[North Sea]]. The editors have worked really hard, but they don't ''yet'' have the skills for such a big topic. I've left some advice at the end of the review. Since I know you're an experienced and helpful GA reviewer, I'd be grateful if you'd have a look and see if there's addtional advice you think would help these editors. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 14:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
269234 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269233 +++$+++ 269233 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.232580480E09 +++$+++ It feels just awful, I known, to fail an article where the editors are motivated and have worked hard. I will take a look and see if there is any more advice to be offered. The topic is big, and also, even though they did not succeed in achieving GA status for the article now, that does not mean they did not learn a great deal from the experience of trying. You offered a great deal of in depth help, and I don't think I could have done as well as you did reviewing the article! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :It feels just awful, I known, to fail an article where the editors are motivated and have worked hard. I will take a look and see if there is any more advice to be offered. The topic is big, and also, even though they did not succeed in achieving GA status for the article now, that does not mean they did not learn a great deal from the experience of trying. You offered a great deal of in depth help, and I don't think I could have done as well as you did reviewing the article! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
269235 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269233 +++$+++ 269234 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.232646600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reassurance that I haven't missed anything important or useful. Feel free to call me if I can help you any time. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the reassurance that I haven't missed anything important or useful. Feel free to call me if I can help you any time. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 09:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

531378 +++$+++ Lester +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-15 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.203098400E09 +++$+++ Hi Somno, you asked for the word \"living\" to be removed from the sentence about Howard being the only living PM not to attend Sorry Day. What other way could it be described? I can't think of an alternative that gets the same meaning across. You may wish to answer the question on this page, on my page, or on the article talk page. Either way. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ Hi Somno, you asked for the word "living" to be removed from the sentence about Howard being the only living PM not to attend Sorry Day. What other way could it be described? I can't think of an alternative that gets the same meaning across. You may wish to answer the question on this page, on my page, or on the article talk page. Either way. Cheers, '''[[User:Lester|<span style="color:green">Lester</span>]]''' 10:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
531379 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531378 +++$+++ 531378 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.203160800E09 +++$+++ Replied on Lester's talk page.  +++$+++ :Replied on Lester's talk page. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno|talk]]) 03:20, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

612851 +++$+++ ZayZayEM +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-04 06:48:00 +++$+++ 1.188913680E09 +++$+++ This is getting way out of hand for me. Plus I keep getting off topic about how science fields aren't stoic boxes. I'm only a lowly undergrad student.-- +++$+++ This is getting way out of hand for me. Plus I keep getting off topic about how science fields aren't stoic boxes. I'm only a lowly undergrad student.--[[User:ZayZayEM|ZayZayEM]] 06:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
612852 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612851 +++$+++ 612851 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 08:33:00 +++$+++ 1.188919980E09 +++$+++ Fair point. Brings me back to the item above! ..  +++$+++ :Fair point. Brings me back to the item above! .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 08:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

7092 +++$+++ Valfontis +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-20 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.300683420E09 +++$+++ I see our edits crossed, but with the same result. Do agree that this article should be held to the same standard as the community articles re: Notable people? I figured it was simpler to be draconian about it, but the [[SHAC 7]] person might be notable? I have no investment in it either way, just trying to cut down on the spam.  +++$+++ I see our edits crossed, but with the same result. Do agree that this article should be held to the same standard as the community articles re: Notable people? I figured it was simpler to be draconian about it, but the [[SHAC 7]] person might be notable? I have no investment in it either way, just trying to cut down on the spam. [[User:Valfontis|Valfontis]] ([[User talk:Valfontis|talk]]) 21:57, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
7093 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7092 +++$+++ 7092 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.300688220E09 +++$+++ Yes, I think the [[WP:BIO|blue link requirement]] is the only way to keep it reasonable. I think some of the ones you removed used to be blue links. The SHAC 7 guy, if I recall correctly, is borderline notable, but keeping him out for consistency sake is best.  +++$+++ :Yes, I think the [[WP:BIO|blue link requirement]] is the only way to keep it reasonable. I think some of the ones you removed used to be blue links. The SHAC 7 guy, if I recall correctly, is borderline notable, but keeping him out for consistency sake is best. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 23:17, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
7094 +++$+++ Valfontis +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7092 +++$+++ 7093 +++$+++ 2011-03-21 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.300695120E09 +++$+++ Cool. For your answer, you win a [[Verboort, Oregon|sausage festival]]. I had no idea the place was so happening. I am so biking there in November.  +++$+++ ::Cool. For your answer, you win a [[Verboort, Oregon|sausage festival]]. I had no idea the place was so happening. I am so biking there in November. [[User:Valfontis|Valfontis]] ([[User talk:Valfontis|talk]]) 01:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

269238 +++$+++ Peregrine_Fisher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-22 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.232694600E09 +++$+++ It's ready for you to take a look whenever you have time.  Thanks. -  +++$+++ It's ready for you to take a look whenever you have time.  Thanks. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 23:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
269239 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269238 +++$+++ 269238 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.232694900E09 +++$+++ I am looking at it right now. I am trying to find the quotebox template, as under [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Quotations|MoS:Quotations]]  the decorative quotation marks are deprecated, I think. I like the quote though - good addition. &mdash; +++$+++ :I am looking at it right now. I am trying to find the quotebox template, as under [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Quotations|MoS:Quotations]]  the decorative quotation marks are deprecated, I think. I like the quote though - good addition. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

269240 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-23 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.232754420E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I'm pleased to see you weighing in on some FAC reviews again; as several editors indicated on the RfC, your Wiki work is recognized and valued.  I hope the New Year will bring positive things for you on Wiki: I welcome a fresh start with the past buried and hope you do, too.  Regards,  +++$+++ Mattisse, I'm pleased to see you weighing in on some FAC reviews again; as several editors indicated on the RfC, your Wiki work is recognized and valued.  I hope the New Year will bring positive things for you on Wiki: I welcome a fresh start with the past buried and hope you do, too.  Regards, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
269241 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269240 +++$+++ 269240 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.232757600E09 +++$+++ OK. &mdash; +++$+++ :OK. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

7098 +++$+++ Jezhotwells +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-13 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.302759420E09 +++$+++ I have nominated this article for reassessment against the good article criteria, following the superficial review and fail by [[User:Wikipedian2]].  As far as I can see the article meets the criteria.  You are invited to comment at the re-assessment page.  +++$+++ I have nominated this article for reassessment against the good article criteria, following the superficial review and fail by [[User:Wikipedian2]].  As far as I can see the article meets the criteria.  You are invited to comment at the re-assessment page. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 22:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
7099 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7098 +++$+++ 7098 +++$+++ 2011-04-14 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.302784980E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 05:43, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

525471 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-04 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.188896700E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/Greg_Kuperberg|Greg Kuperberg]] has moved Tendonitis and Achilles Tendonitis to [[Tendinitis]] for both.  As a layperson I'm not sure about the difference, I'd never spell it as tendinitis but I know both spellings are accepted medically.  Is there a policy, appropriate spelling, anything?  Thanks,  +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/Greg_Kuperberg|Greg Kuperberg]] has moved Tendonitis and Achilles Tendonitis to [[Tendinitis]] for both.  As a layperson I'm not sure about the difference, I'd never spell it as tendinitis but I know both spellings are accepted medically.  Is there a policy, appropriate spelling, anything?  Thanks, [[User:WLU|WLU]] 02:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
525472 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525471 +++$+++ 525471 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.188897240E09 +++$+++ Of the spellings from the infobox sources, three prefer \"Tendinitis\" (including [[ICD-10]] and [[ICD-9]]) and only one prefers \"Tendonitis\" ([[eMedicine]]). \"Tendonitis\" wins on Google and on PubMed, but only by a very small margin. Finally, of the three interwiki links that are cognates (es, fr, and pt), all three communities independently chose the \"i\" spelling. Given that data, and [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(medicine-related_articles)#Naming_conventions|MEDMOS]], I think that the ICD spelling (\"Tendinitis\") is probably the right choice. -- +++$+++ :Of the spellings from the infobox sources, three prefer "Tendinitis" (including [[ICD-10]] and [[ICD-9]]) and only one prefers "Tendonitis" ([[eMedicine]]). "Tendonitis" wins on Google and on PubMed, but only by a very small margin. Finally, of the three interwiki links that are cognates (es, fr, and pt), all three communities independently chose the "i" spelling. Given that data, and [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(medicine-related_articles)#Naming_conventions|MEDMOS]], I think that the ICD spelling ("Tendinitis") is probably the right choice. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 02:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

531389 +++$+++ Wongm +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-18 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.205830920E09 +++$+++ Will review it soon.  +++$+++ Will review it soon. [[User:Wongm|Wongm]] ([[User talk:Wongm|talk]]) 02:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
531390 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531389 +++$+++ 531389 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.205831340E09 +++$+++ Yes (I didn't think the review was going to be so long when I started!), but it was worth it because a lot of you put a lot of effort into the article! :) Thanks,  +++$+++ :Yes (I didn't think the review was going to be so long when I started!), but it was worth it because a lot of you put a lot of effort into the article! :) Thanks, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
531391 +++$+++ Littleteddy +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531389 +++$+++ 531390 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.205957460E09 +++$+++ Hi Somno, I loved your thoroughness. Next time I develop a GA, could I get you to review it please? :) Thanks, <font face=\"comic sans ms\"> +++$+++ ::Hi Somno, I loved your thoroughness. Next time I develop a GA, could I get you to review it please? :) Thanks, <font face="comic sans ms">[[User talk:Littleteddy|Littleteddy]]... keep me in a good mood</font> 13:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
531392 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531389 +++$+++ 531391 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.205996520E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Only if your article is shorter than the Geelong one! ;)  +++$+++ :::Thanks! Only if your article is shorter than the Geelong one! ;) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 00:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
531393 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531389 +++$+++ 531389 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.206357120E09 +++$+++ Hi Kelly, yes, you probably do know a lot about the industry, I'm not disputing that, and I'm also not disputing that the information is true. I am saying that it's not a reliable source as far as Wikipedia is concerned. The article on Dancerdolls has this as its sole reference: \"This article is based on the experience and opinions of seasoned dancers and ex-dancers who were interviewed by Kelly Davis of Dancerdolls.com\". Wikipedia is not the place for the people's experience and opinions, no matter how true or interesting. Does this make sense? Have you read the [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] policy I mentioned on your talk page? I think it does a better job of explaining it than I do! Hope that helps,  +++$+++ :Hi Kelly, yes, you probably do know a lot about the industry, I'm not disputing that, and I'm also not disputing that the information is true. I am saying that it's not a reliable source as far as Wikipedia is concerned. The article on Dancerdolls has this as its sole reference: "This article is based on the experience and opinions of seasoned dancers and ex-dancers who were interviewed by Kelly Davis of Dancerdolls.com". Wikipedia is not the place for the people's experience and opinions, no matter how true or interesting. Does this make sense? Have you read the [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] policy I mentioned on your talk page? I think it does a better job of explaining it than I do! Hope that helps, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 04:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

7103 +++$+++ CanalPark +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7103 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-15 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.302935340E09 +++$+++ Hello, Aboutmovies. I see that you recently reviewed [[Monitor Group]] for WikiProject Universities; I had placed the WikiProject templates on the page. Earlier today, I [[Talk:Monitor_Group#Assistance_requested|posted a request for an independent editor]] to review the article in light of facts and research I have introduced. I do not wish to edit the page directly, because I am commenting on behalf of Monitor Group, and the subject matter I have inquired about is sensitive, especially now. If you have the time and are willing, please review and take any action on the page you see fit. Thank you,  +++$+++ Hello, Aboutmovies. I see that you recently reviewed [[Monitor Group]] for WikiProject Universities; I had placed the WikiProject templates on the page. Earlier today, I [[Talk:Monitor_Group#Assistance_requested|posted a request for an independent editor]] to review the article in light of facts and research I have introduced. I do not wish to edit the page directly, because I am commenting on behalf of Monitor Group, and the subject matter I have inquired about is sensitive, especially now. If you have the time and are willing, please review and take any action on the page you see fit. Thank you, [[User:CanalPark|CanalPark]] ([[User talk:CanalPark|talk]]) 23:29, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
7104 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7103 +++$+++ 7103 +++$+++ 2011-04-16 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.302958020E09 +++$+++ I probably don't have time, I suggest posting at [[WT:UNI]] as they are generally an active group.  +++$+++ :I probably don't have time, I suggest posting at [[WT:UNI]] as they are generally an active group. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 05:47, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
7105 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7103 +++$+++ 7103 +++$+++ 2011-04-17 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.303041480E09 +++$+++ Done, though next time, feel free to update it yourself, just keep it [[WP:NPOV|neutral\/unbiased]].  +++$+++ :Done, though next time, feel free to update it yourself, just keep it [[WP:NPOV|neutral/unbiased]]. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 04:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

269249 +++$+++ NoCal100 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269249 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-23 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.232713440E09 +++$+++ I don't understand your citation request. Please see the comment I left on the talk page of the article.  +++$+++ I don't understand your citation request. Please see the comment I left on the talk page of the article. [[User:NoCal100|NoCal100]] ([[User talk:NoCal100|talk]]) 04:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
269250 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269249 +++$+++ 269249 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.232713680E09 +++$+++ OK, I will look. But the essesnce of it is that you need a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] stating that the [[Zarqa River]] has been identified as the same one mentioned in the Bible.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, I will look. But the essesnce of it is that you need a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] stating that the [[Zarqa River]] has been identified as the same one mentioned in the Bible.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
269251 +++$+++ NoCal100 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269249 +++$+++ 269250 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.232713860E09 +++$+++ I've added such a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] to the article, before you tagged it. If there's something wrong with that source, or with what it says, please be explicit about it so I can fix it.  +++$+++ ::I've added such a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] to the article, before you tagged it. If there's something wrong with that source, or with what it says, please be explicit about it so I can fix it. [[User:NoCal100|NoCal100]] ([[User talk:NoCal100|talk]]) 04:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
269252 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269249 +++$+++ 269251 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.232714640E09 +++$+++ Too tired tonight to do more, but as I remember it was a dictionary source, which is fine for pronunciation and such, but not for the veracity of a historical fact. If in doubt we can ask at the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources\/Noticeboard\u200e]].  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Too tired tonight to do more, but as I remember it was a dictionary source, which is fine for pronunciation and such, but not for the veracity of a historical fact. If in doubt we can ask at the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard‎]].  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
269253 +++$+++ NoCal100 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269249 +++$+++ 269252 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.232714940E09 +++$+++ No, it's ''The Oxford History of the Biblical World''. Have a look when you get the chance.  +++$+++ ::::No, it's ''The Oxford History of the Biblical World''. Have a look when you get the chance. [[User:NoCal100|NoCal100]] ([[User talk:NoCal100|talk]]) 04:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
269254 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269249 +++$+++ 269253 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.232743980E09 +++$+++ Sorry. That sounds fine. So I will take care of it. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Sorry. That sounds fine. So I will take care of it. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:53, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

7106 +++$+++ Eastenra +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7106 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-17 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.303065540E09 +++$+++ It's honor to promote European artists like as [[Ennio Morricone]], [[Andrea Bocelli]],  especially they are cooperating with [[New Zealand]] amazing songwriter and graceful soprano [[Hayley Westenra]]!  +++$+++ It's honor to promote European artists like as [[Ennio Morricone]], [[Andrea Bocelli]],  especially they are cooperating with [[New Zealand]] amazing songwriter and graceful soprano [[Hayley Westenra]]! [[User:Eastenra|Eastenra]] ([[User talk:Eastenra|talk]]) 11:39, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
7107 +++$+++ Tedder +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7106 +++$+++ 7106 +++$+++ 2011-04-20 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.303334880E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=8P27cyhFo6E Don't you mean 'MERICA]? And what's up with the odd racism?  +++$+++ :[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8P27cyhFo6E Don't you mean 'MERICA]? And what's up with the odd racism? [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 14:28, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
7108 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7106 +++$+++ 7107 +++$+++ 2011-04-21 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.303389660E09 +++$+++ Tedder, and the half-dozen other admins with my talk page on their watchlist, please block this editor and the IP s\/he has used (50.43.36.157) if they attempt any further personal attacks or racist comments.  +++$+++ ::Tedder, and the half-dozen other admins with my talk page on their watchlist, please block this editor and the IP s/he has used (50.43.36.157) if they attempt any further personal attacks or racist comments. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 05:41, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

531398 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-03 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.207227540E09 +++$+++ If we ever meet in real life i owe you either a jug (or perhaps an afternoons worth of coffee) - I could be more extreme - but hey that is beyond my wildest dreams - thank you for expanding the stub - would you be interested in any other arts that need work? ;)   +++$+++ If we ever meet in real life i owe you either a jug (or perhaps an afternoons worth of coffee) - I could be more extreme - but hey that is beyond my wildest dreams - thank you for expanding the stub - would you be interested in any other arts that need work? ;)  [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 05:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
531399 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531398 +++$+++ 531398 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.207228020E09 +++$+++ No worries. Thought I'd do a quick search in Factiva and see if anything came up, and it did, so there goes my lunch break! :) What else do you have that needs work? I already have a bunch of articles I'm working on, but a bit of variety's always good.  +++$+++ :No worries. Thought I'd do a quick search in Factiva and see if anything came up, and it did, so there goes my lunch break! :) What else do you have that needs work? I already have a bunch of articles I'm working on, but a bit of variety's always good. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 06:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

269255 +++$+++ NoCal100 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269255 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.232950920E09 +++$+++ Have a look at the recent changes I've introduced, to \"beef up\" the article.  +++$+++ Have a look at the recent changes I've introduced, to "beef up" the article. [[User:NoCal100|NoCal100]] ([[User talk:NoCal100|talk]]) 22:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
269256 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269255 +++$+++ 269255 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.232954940E09 +++$+++ Very good job. The article passes GA. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Very good job. The article passes GA. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
269257 +++$+++ NoCal100 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269255 +++$+++ 269256 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.232955600E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Thanks! [[User:NoCal100|NoCal100]] ([[User talk:NoCal100|talk]]) 23:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

531400 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-03 06:15:00 +++$+++ 1.207228500E09 +++$+++ The UWA student guild article is a hagiography of the current instalment of guile and brash youth - I donated my collection of materials ( I have donated an ephemera collection in ''another'' uni library that is about 3 metres but thats  another story ) to the guild archives about 10 years ago or more - and dont have access to them anymore - but there is surely something around?  Maybe the history that is mentioned on the prosh talk page? the history is far more interesting than the current line up  +++$+++ The UWA student guild article is a hagiography of the current instalment of guile and brash youth - I donated my collection of materials ( I have donated an ephemera collection in ''another'' uni library that is about 3 metres but thats  another story ) to the guild archives about 10 years ago or more - and dont have access to them anymore - but there is surely something around?  Maybe the history that is mentioned on the prosh talk page? the history is far more interesting than the current line up [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 06:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
531401 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531400 +++$+++ 531400 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.207232040E09 +++$+++ Hmm, I'll give it a go. Its list of current reps is annoying me already, and it'd be nice to replace that with something more interesting and useful.  +++$+++ :Hmm, I'll give it a go. Its list of current reps is annoying me already, and it'd be nice to replace that with something more interesting and useful. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 07:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
531402 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531400 +++$+++ 531401 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.207234560E09 +++$+++ If you have difficulty finding anything - I might be near the campus next week - and might try to track down the guild history book  +++$+++ ::If you have difficulty finding anything - I might be near the campus next week - and might try to track down the guild history book [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 07:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

438092 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ 438092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.311851220E09 +++$+++ Is this related to the new subpage system that has been implemented? -- +++$+++ Is this related to the new subpage system that has been implemented? --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 04:07, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
438093 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ 438092 +++$+++ 438092 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311891840E09 +++$+++ Yep, see [[#Wikipedia:Did you know\/DYK hook count]]. I stopped it instead of letting it run and produce inaccurate stats.  +++$+++ :Yep, see [[#Wikipedia:Did you know/DYK hook count]]. I stopped it instead of letting it run and produce inaccurate stats. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator#top|talk]]) 15:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
438094 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ 438092 +++$+++ 438093 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.312337700E09 +++$+++ The output from [[Wikipedia:Did you know\/DYK hook count]] is still appearing on the Queue page, but it hasn't been updated since July 24... The count has been really useful in the past; it should be reinstated if at all possible, IMO. -- +++$+++ ::The output from [[Wikipedia:Did you know/DYK hook count]] is still appearing on the Queue page, but it hasn't been updated since July 24... The count has been really useful in the past; it should be reinstated if at all possible, IMO. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 19:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
438095 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ 438092 +++$+++ 438094 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.312376400E09 +++$+++ I'll try to get to it within a week.  +++$+++ :::I'll try to get to it within a week. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator#top|talk]]) 06:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
438096 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ 438092 +++$+++ 438095 +++$+++ 2011-08-07 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.312725480E09 +++$+++ DYKHousekeepingBot is now up and running. It's a decent bit more brittle than it used to be, since it's now scraping the HTML directly and not the wikitext. Also, the sections that have been promoted (and show only \"Promoted:\" and a link) are seen as unverified hooks by the bot. If we can add some sort of marker (HTML comment?), I can make the bot ignore those sections entirely.  +++$+++ ::::DYKHousekeepingBot is now up and running. It's a decent bit more brittle than it used to be, since it's now scraping the HTML directly and not the wikitext. Also, the sections that have been promoted (and show only "Promoted:" and a link) are seen as unverified hooks by the bot. If we can add some sort of marker (HTML comment?), I can make the bot ignore those sections entirely. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator#top|talk]]) 06:58, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
438097 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ 438092 +++$+++ 438096 +++$+++ 2011-08-07 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.312759680E09 +++$+++ I can do that, for both promoted and rejected noms. How about <code><nowiki><!--Archived nomination--><\/nowiki><\/code> in front of both? (I mean, in front of the \"Promoted:\", not in front of the section header.) <b class=\"IPA\">[[Special:Contributions\/Rjanag|r<font color=\"#8B0000\">\u02a8<\/font>ana\u0262]]<\/b>&nbsp;( +++$+++ :::::I can do that, for both promoted and rejected noms. How about <code><nowiki><!--Archived nomination--></nowiki></code> in front of both? (I mean, in front of the "Promoted:", not in front of the section header.) <b class="IPA">[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;([[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]) 16:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

269258 +++$+++ Wildroot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-24 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.232797200E09 +++$+++ I think I fixed your concerns, but you should check to see if I did it the proper way, or if the article needs more improvement. Thanks for the review.  +++$+++ I think I fixed your concerns, but you should check to see if I did it the proper way, or if the article needs more improvement. Thanks for the review. [[User:Wildroot|Wildroot]] ([[User talk:Wildroot|talk]]) 03:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
269259 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269258 +++$+++ 269258 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.232938740E09 +++$+++ The article is now GA. Good work. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :The article is now GA. Good work. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

531403 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531403 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-03 08:02:00 +++$+++ 1.207234920E09 +++$+++ bah - they never have had a very good sense of their place in the insanity of the crawley campus - even if they are the main provider so to speak   +++$+++ bah - they never have had a very good sense of their place in the insanity of the crawley campus - even if they are the main provider so to speak  [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 08:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
531404 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531403 +++$+++ 531403 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.207298700E09 +++$+++ I don't know, \"Wahoo : The Song Book Of The Century\" seems very helpful... ;)  +++$+++ :I don't know, "Wahoo : The Song Book Of The Century" seems very helpful... ;) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 01:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
531405 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531403 +++$+++ 531404 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.207298880E09 +++$+++ To think that big carving in what remains of the arts faculty building  'know thyself' - clearly never hit the eyballs or the conciousness of the guild pollies as they rushed out of reid coffee shop (theres another uwa library article was a coi and needs working on) down to the tavern  +++$+++ ::To think that big carving in what remains of the arts faculty building  'know thyself' - clearly never hit the eyballs or the conciousness of the guild pollies as they rushed out of reid coffee shop (theres another uwa library article was a coi and needs working on) down to the tavern [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 01:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
531406 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531403 +++$+++ 531405 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.207299780E09 +++$+++ If I work on another UWA article, the guilt of the poor neglected ECU article will be overwhelming... next uni article I tackle should probably be that. :)  +++$+++ :::If I work on another UWA article, the guilt of the poor neglected ECU article will be overwhelming... next uni article I tackle should probably be that. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
531407 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531403 +++$+++ 531403 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.207299780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for getting back to me. No, certainly not illegal - I just wanted to make sure you knew her and weren't vandalising her userpage. I also didn't mention the term \"sockpuppet\". :)  +++$+++ :Thanks for getting back to me. No, certainly not illegal - I just wanted to make sure you knew her and weren't vandalising her userpage. I also didn't mention the term "sockpuppet". :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
531408 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531403 +++$+++ 531403 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.207300920E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, I don't think you're a vandal. :) I've answered the image question on your talk page as requested.  +++$+++ :Don't worry, I don't think you're a vandal. :) I've answered the image question on your talk page as requested. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

269260 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-24 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.232797980E09 +++$+++ Btw, do you realize that \"Lightbot\" doesn't mean the script? although I have little confidence in it. It means [[User:Lightbot]], a bot whose [[Wikipedia:Bots\/Requests for approval\/Lightbot 3|request for approval]] is a license to do pretty much anything, by a botmaster who [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Lightmouse&diff=265266647&oldid=265241092 now admits] being the infamous {{checkuser|Bobblewik}}; check the block log.  +++$+++ Btw, do you realize that "Lightbot" doesn't mean the script? although I have little confidence in it. It means [[User:Lightbot]], a bot whose [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Lightbot 3|request for approval]] is a license to do pretty much anything, by a botmaster who [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lightmouse&diff=265266647&oldid=265241092 now admits] being the infamous {{checkuser|Bobblewik}}; check the block log. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 03:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
269261 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269260 +++$+++ 269260 +++$+++ 2009-01-24 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.232849940E09 +++$+++ I am becoming less clear what is being arbitrated. Is it the behavior of \"Lightbot\" the editor, or \"Lightbot\" the bot? Or is it the issue of edit warring between factions? Or is it the issue of autoformatting of dates? Or is it the need to promote links to date pages? &mdash; +++$+++ :I am becoming less clear what is being arbitrated. Is it the behavior of "Lightbot" the editor, or "Lightbot" the bot? Or is it the issue of edit warring between factions? Or is it the issue of autoformatting of dates? Or is it the need to promote links to date pages? &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:19, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
269262 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269260 +++$+++ 269261 +++$+++ 2009-01-24 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.232865900E09 +++$+++ Lightbot is the bot; Lightmouse is the human editor. Both have user accounts (this is standard for bots); the actions of both, and much else, are being arbitrated. The evidence may be the clearest place to start.  +++$+++ ::Lightbot is the bot; Lightmouse is the human editor. Both have user accounts (this is standard for bots); the actions of both, and much else, are being arbitrated. The evidence may be the clearest place to start. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 22:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
269263 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269260 +++$+++ 269262 +++$+++ 2009-01-24 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.232866560E09 +++$+++ I did look at the evidence as well as the workshop proposals. That is why I ask. It focus is not clear. I would not be surprised if the Arbcom's decision has little to do with the evidence provided. (I will look through it again).  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I did look at the evidence as well as the workshop proposals. That is why I ask. It focus is not clear. I would not be surprised if the Arbcom's decision has little to do with the evidence provided. (I will look through it again).  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

269264 +++$+++ Drilnoth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-24 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.232857440E09 +++$+++ At the [[Talk:Drizzt Do'Urden|the article's talk page]] there's been discussion about trying to bring it up to FA-Class. Since you reviewed if for the GA, I was wondering if you could provide any advice on how it should be improved before a nomination. Thanks! - +++$+++ At the [[Talk:Drizzt Do'Urden|the article's talk page]] there's been discussion about trying to bring it up to FA-Class. Since you reviewed if for the GA, I was wondering if you could provide any advice on how it should be improved before a nomination. Thanks! -[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|talk]]) 20:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
269265 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269264 +++$+++ 269264 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.232939220E09 +++$+++ Just to read [[Wikipedia:Featured article criteria]] and perhaps look through the current list of [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates]] to get an idea of what happens there. I believe I can safely say that is is not an experience everyone finds pleasurable, so you have to be prepared.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Just to read [[Wikipedia:Featured article criteria]] and perhaps look through the current list of [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates]] to get an idea of what happens there. I believe I can safely say that is is not an experience everyone finds pleasurable, so you have to be prepared.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:07, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
269266 +++$+++ Drilnoth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269264 +++$+++ 269265 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.232941020E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks! - +++$+++ ::Okay, thanks! -[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|talk]]) 19:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

531409 +++$+++ SuggestBot +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-11 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.207956420E09 +++$+++ P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on [[User:SuggestBot\/Requests|the SuggestBot request page]].  If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --  +++$+++ P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on [[User:SuggestBot/Requests|the SuggestBot request page]].  If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 16:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
531410 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531409 +++$+++ 531409 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.208171700E09 +++$+++ Hmmm, SuggestBot sure thinks that I like cars...  +++$+++ :Hmmm, SuggestBot sure thinks that I like cars... [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 04:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
531411 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531409 +++$+++ 531410 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.208172660E09 +++$+++ That's hilarious. :-D But ForteTuba won't think so; I hope you're going to give him some feedback on this.  +++$+++ ::That's hilarious. :-D But ForteTuba won't think so; I hope you're going to give him some feedback on this. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 04:31, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
531412 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531409 +++$+++ 531411 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.208174640E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I've left a message. I'd hoped SuggestBot could tell that my edits to car articles (external link removals done right after one another) were bot-like minor article edits, not articles I spent a lot of time improving and therefore might show an interest in.  +++$+++ :::Yeah, I've left a message. I'd hoped SuggestBot could tell that my edits to car articles (external link removals done right after one another) were bot-like minor article edits, not articles I spent a lot of time improving and therefore might show an interest in. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 05:04, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
531413 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531409 +++$+++ 531412 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.208176140E09 +++$+++ Ah, it all makes sense to me now. SuggestBot doesn't use the live database. It uses a recent database dump. In this case it uses a dump in which the most recent 500 of your edits are ''all'' car-related.  +++$+++ ::::Ah, it all makes sense to me now. SuggestBot doesn't use the live database. It uses a recent database dump. In this case it uses a dump in which the most recent 500 of your edits are ''all'' car-related. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 05:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

7122 +++$+++ Tedder +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-31 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.306889040E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Columbia_College_%28Oregon%29&curid=31920156&diff=431859164&oldid=431699183 \"The college also had an issue with slavery, which was illegal in Oregon at that time\"].. it doesn't really explain what the issue was. Can you word it better?  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Columbia_College_%28Oregon%29&curid=31920156&diff=431859164&oldid=431699183 "The college also had an issue with slavery, which was illegal in Oregon at that time"].. it doesn't really explain what the issue was. Can you word it better? [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 17:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
7123 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7122 +++$+++ 7122 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.306889160E09 +++$+++ I wish I could, but the source doesn't give what the issue was. Given that it was illegal, and some knowledge about Joaquin Miller at that time, I would surmise that the school or many in the school were pro-slavery. If the OHQ volume with the multiple pages numbers could be located, that may provide the answer.  +++$+++ :I wish I could, but the source doesn't give what the issue was. Given that it was illegal, and some knowledge about Joaquin Miller at that time, I would surmise that the school or many in the school were pro-slavery. If the OHQ volume with the multiple pages numbers could be located, that may provide the answer. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 17:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
7124 +++$+++ Tedder +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7122 +++$+++ 7123 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.306889340E09 +++$+++ Gotcha. I wish I was still in PDX- I'd go grab the dead-tree OHQ and look it up. I assumed the awkward wording was yours- not that the information was missing. Sorry for the incorrect assumption.  +++$+++ ::Gotcha. I wish I was still in PDX- I'd go grab the dead-tree OHQ and look it up. I assumed the awkward wording was yours- not that the information was missing. Sorry for the incorrect assumption. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 17:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
7125 +++$+++ Valfontis +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7122 +++$+++ 7124 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.308183060E09 +++$+++ Pete might still have some dead-tree OHQs, he posted a list somewhere. Just a heads up, I've been approved to get a [[Credo Reference]] account (which I haven't set up yet), and I also have access to JSTOR via a friend. Let me know if you need me to find something and I may get around to it eventually.  +++$+++ :::Pete might still have some dead-tree OHQs, he posted a list somewhere. Just a heads up, I've been approved to get a [[Credo Reference]] account (which I haven't set up yet), and I also have access to JSTOR via a friend. Let me know if you need me to find something and I may get around to it eventually. [[User:Valfontis|Valfontis]] ([[User talk:Valfontis|talk]]) 17:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
7126 +++$+++ Esprqii +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7122 +++$+++ 7125 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.308186660E09 +++$+++ I was gonna say, I  now have Pete's stash of DTOHQs (they aren't permitted to cross state lines dontchaknow) and I'd be happy to sift through 'em if there is a particular reference we need to look up. -- +++$+++ ::::I was gonna say, I  now have Pete's stash of DTOHQs (they aren't permitted to cross state lines dontchaknow) and I'd be happy to sift through 'em if there is a particular reference we need to look up. --[[User:Esprqii|Esprqii]] ([[User talk:Esprqii|talk]]) 18:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
7127 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7122 +++$+++ 7126 +++$+++ 2011-06-16 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.308232920E09 +++$+++ I think Pete's old stash is a bit newer than what is needed here, but here are articles: OHQ vol. 32, p. 67; OHQ vol. 56, pp. 327-351.  +++$+++ :::::I think Pete's old stash is a bit newer than what is needed here, but here are articles: OHQ vol. 32, p. 67; OHQ vol. 56, pp. 327-351. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 07:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
7128 +++$+++ Another Believer +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7122 +++$+++ 7122 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.308177240E09 +++$+++ Wow, congrats! Also, thanks so much for adding\/correcting categories for the NRHP sites in Portland. The external tool I was using to create those stubs did not always generate the best categories (but it was a helpful tool nonetheless). Hopefully many of these stubs will become GAs over time! Thanks again. --<font color=\"navy\"> +++$+++ : Wow, congrats! Also, thanks so much for adding/correcting categories for the NRHP sites in Portland. The external tool I was using to create those stubs did not always generate the best categories (but it was a helpful tool nonetheless). Hopefully many of these stubs will become GAs over time! Thanks again. --<font color="navy">[[User:Another Believer|Another Believer]]</font> <sub>(<font color="cc6600">[[User talk:Another Believer|Talk]]</font>)</sub> 15:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
7129 +++$+++ Finetooth +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7122 +++$+++ 7128 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.308180180E09 +++$+++ Congratulations. That is an amazing milestone.  +++$+++ ::Congratulations. That is an amazing milestone. [[User:Finetooth|Finetooth]] ([[User talk:Finetooth|talk]]) 16:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
7130 +++$+++ Little Mountain 5 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7122 +++$+++ 7129 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.308182340E09 +++$+++ Whoa! That is awesome. Congrats! '''''<font style=\"font-variant:small-caps;\"> +++$+++ :::Whoa! That is awesome. Congrats! '''''<font style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Little Mountain 5|<font color="black">Little</font>]][[User talk:Little Mountain 5|<font color="red">Mountain</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Little Mountain 5|<font color="blue">5</font>]]</font>''''' 16:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
7131 +++$+++ Valfontis +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7122 +++$+++ 7130 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.308182700E09 +++$+++ I am so envious! Congratulations!  +++$+++ ::::I am so envious! Congratulations! [[User:Valfontis|Valfontis]] ([[User talk:Valfontis|talk]]) 17:05, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

269267 +++$+++ RexxS +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.232941500E09 +++$+++ Also it may be helpful to sign, even though it's in your section (saves scrolling up to find out who made the comment). Hope that helps. Cheers -- +++$+++ Also it may be helpful to sign, even though it's in your section (saves scrolling up to find out who made the comment). Hope that helps. Cheers --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 19:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
269268 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269267 +++$+++ 269267 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.232941860E09 +++$+++ OK, I will try to manage doing what you suggest. I have to admit being somewhat visually challenged in this kind of task and do not understand where I should be putting what. Thanks for the suggestion.  &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, I will try to manage doing what you suggest. I have to admit being somewhat visually challenged in this kind of task and do not understand where I should be putting what. Thanks for the suggestion.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

269270 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-23 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.232740080E09 +++$+++ Also, have you been keeping an eye on discussions at [[Talk:Rudolf Wolters]]?  Definitely we have some limitations there but I am hoping that I can glean some info out of the German book I have ordered and hopefully will come early next week.  All the best,-- +++$+++ Also, have you been keeping an eye on discussions at [[Talk:Rudolf Wolters]]?  Definitely we have some limitations there but I am hoping that I can glean some info out of the German book I have ordered and hopefully will come early next week.  All the best,--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 11:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
269271 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269270 +++$+++ 269270 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.232744580E09 +++$+++ I have been keeps an eye on the Rudolf Wolters discussions. The article needs work. What happened to your sleek, sparse style, strictly NPOV of the [[Albert Speer]] days? (Some of your \"journalist\" style - \"Wolters was angrily intransigent\" - seems to have appeared!) Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I have been keeps an eye on the Rudolf Wolters discussions. The article needs work. What happened to your sleek, sparse style, strictly NPOV of the [[Albert Speer]] days? (Some of your "journalist" style - "Wolters was angrily intransigent" - seems to have appeared!) Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:03, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
269272 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269270 +++$+++ 269271 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.232747640E09 +++$+++ I didn't put that in there, that was Fainites.  I've been meaning to smooth that out.  Before we nominate for FA, I will go through it and assure a consistant style.  Wolters' blockquotes speak for him better than anyone else would care to.-- +++$+++ ::I didn't put that in there, that was Fainites.  I've been meaning to smooth that out.  Before we nominate for FA, I will go through it and assure a consistant style.  Wolters' blockquotes speak for him better than anyone else would care to.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 13:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
269273 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269270 +++$+++ 269272 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.232748060E09 +++$+++ I agree. Let the material (Rudolf Wolters) speak for itself. &mdash; +++$+++ :::I agree. Let the material (Rudolf Wolters) speak for itself. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
269274 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269270 +++$+++ 269273 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.233136680E09 +++$+++ Well, Rogers passed FA (I've nominated it for TFA because the 300th anniversary of the rescue of Selkirk is on Sunday).  Given that we are not yet ready to go on Wolters, I've let the Lane article cut in line and nominated it for FA.-- +++$+++ ::::Well, Rogers passed FA (I've nominated it for TFA because the 300th anniversary of the rescue of Selkirk is on Sunday).  Given that we are not yet ready to go on Wolters, I've let the Lane article cut in line and nominated it for FA.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
269275 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269270 +++$+++ 269274 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.233136860E09 +++$+++ Tell me something that will get me interested in Lane. I would love to be but he doesn't match Speer or Rogers.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Tell me something that will get me interested in Lane. I would love to be but he doesn't match Speer or Rogers.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
269276 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269270 +++$+++ 269275 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.233137040E09 +++$+++ What about his comment that has been used as a putdown of New Jersey (especially the legislature) for the better part of a century: \"Nobody comes back from Trenton knowing anything more than when he went.\"-- +++$+++ ::::::What about his comment that has been used as a putdown of New Jersey (especially the legislature) for the better part of a century: "Nobody comes back from Trenton knowing anything more than when he went."--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 02:04, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
269277 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269270 +++$+++ 269276 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.233137220E09 +++$+++ You must be from New Jersey! How are you going to parley that into a main page date?  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::You must be from New Jersey! How are you going to parley that into a main page date?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
269278 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269270 +++$+++ 269277 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.233137340E09 +++$+++ Dunno yet, it is early days yet.  Getting it through FA is gonna be a challenge because the best ref on Lane is the book of letters, with added bio detail, that his widow published after his death.  And yes, I grew up in [[Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey]].-- +++$+++ ::::::::Dunno yet, it is early days yet.  Getting it through FA is gonna be a challenge because the best ref on Lane is the book of letters, with added bio detail, that his widow published after his death.  And yes, I grew up in [[Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey]].--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 02:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
269279 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269270 +++$+++ 269278 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.233137580E09 +++$+++ Is the [[Woodes Rogers]] main page entry something that I should vote on?  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::Is the [[Woodes Rogers]] main page entry something that I should vote on?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

531418 +++$+++ Ursasapien +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-23 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.208963640E09 +++$+++ I have done some significant editing.  Could you give another look and perhaps tell me if I am close or not?  Thanks again for your review and for your volunteer service.   +++$+++ I have done some significant editing.  Could you give another look and perhaps tell me if I am close or not?  Thanks again for your review and for your volunteer service.  [[User:Ursasapien|Ursasapien]] <small>[[User talk:Ursasapien|(talk)]]</small> 08:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
531419 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531418 +++$+++ 531418 +++$+++ 2008-04-26 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.209221100E09 +++$+++ Hey Ursasapien, you and the other editors have done a great job with the article. Only a couple of small problems left, the main one being a lack of references. Seeing what you've achieved so far makes me confident the article will be a GA soon! Regards,  +++$+++ :Hey Ursasapien, you and the other editors have done a great job with the article. Only a couple of small problems left, the main one being a lack of references. Seeing what you've achieved so far makes me confident the article will be a GA soon! Regards, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 07:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

7132 +++$+++ TaerkastUA +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.308512940E09 +++$+++ Hi. I asked on [[Template talk:Infobox high court#2nd chief judge|the talk page]] whether it's possible to add a parameter for a second chief judge, i.e. a deputy or otherwise. I'm not too good with infoboxes and codes. Thanks, -- +++$+++ Hi. I asked on [[Template talk:Infobox high court#2nd chief judge|the talk page]] whether it's possible to add a parameter for a second chief judge, i.e. a deputy or otherwise. I'm not too good with infoboxes and codes. Thanks, --[[User:TaerkastUA|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Tærkast'''</span>]] ([[User talk:TaerkastUA|'''Discuss''']]) 12:49, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
7133 +++$+++ TaerkastUA +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7132 +++$+++ 7132 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.309205460E09 +++$+++ Nobody seems willing to respond. I'll try and do it myself.-- +++$+++ :Nobody seems willing to respond. I'll try and do it myself.--[[User:TaerkastUA|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Tærkast'''</span>]] ([[User talk:TaerkastUA|'''Discuss''']]) 13:11, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

7135 +++$+++ Droll +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7135 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-25 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.309008720E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you edited [[Bald Peak State Scenic Viewpoint]] and changed the nearest city. In the [[:Template:Infobox park#Parameter descriptions|parameter descriptions]] section on the doc page for {{tl|Infobox park}} it mentions that the nearest city \"could be a city with a major airport or a large gateway town where supplies and lodging are available\". That's why I've skipped past smaller cities in most of my recent edits to articles about Oregon state parks. I have to admit that I wrote that documentation but it reflects the documentation for {{tl|Infobox protected area}}. I updated the documentation for that template as well, but the phrase was there before my update, if my memory is correct. Anyway, no big deal. Maybe \"major airport\" is a bit much and I'll change that now. If you have any thoughts on the matter, I would be glad to hear them.&#32;\u2013<font style=\"color:#355E3B\"> +++$+++ I noticed that you edited [[Bald Peak State Scenic Viewpoint]] and changed the nearest city. In the [[:Template:Infobox park#Parameter descriptions|parameter descriptions]] section on the doc page for {{tl|Infobox park}} it mentions that the nearest city "could be a city with a major airport or a large gateway town where supplies and lodging are available". That's why I've skipped past smaller cities in most of my recent edits to articles about Oregon state parks. I have to admit that I wrote that documentation but it reflects the documentation for {{tl|Infobox protected area}}. I updated the documentation for that template as well, but the phrase was there before my update, if my memory is correct. Anyway, no big deal. Maybe "major airport" is a bit much and I'll change that now. If you have any thoughts on the matter, I would be glad to hear them.&#32;–<font style="color:#355E3B">[[User:Droll|'''droll''']]</font>&nbsp;<font style="color:#704214">[[User talk:Droll|'''&#91;chat&#93;''']]</font> 06:32, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
7136 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7135 +++$+++ 7135 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.309009740E09 +++$+++ One problem I see is that it could get into a rather trivial discussion as to which city then meet this somewhat ambiguous criteria. Or where you have a situation such as with Bald Peak where I am assuming you are not from the area? With Bald Peak specifically, Newberg has an airport and a major hotel now, Tigard does not. Not to mention Hillsboro is a lot closer than Tigard and has the state's 2d busiest airport and is nearly twice as big as Tigard (and about 4x bigger than Newberg). Which takes us back to the first point. I think it should probably be something like this: if a park is in a metropolitan area (which has specific definitions set forth by the Census bureau) go with the actual closest incorporated city. If it is outside of a metro area (say Crater Lake National Park) then go with the \"gateway city\" option which would have the amenities mentioned, and which I think I have heard many cities mentioned as a gateway to this or that national park\/monument so one might even be able to have a citation and mention in the body.  +++$+++ :One problem I see is that it could get into a rather trivial discussion as to which city then meet this somewhat ambiguous criteria. Or where you have a situation such as with Bald Peak where I am assuming you are not from the area? With Bald Peak specifically, Newberg has an airport and a major hotel now, Tigard does not. Not to mention Hillsboro is a lot closer than Tigard and has the state's 2d busiest airport and is nearly twice as big as Tigard (and about 4x bigger than Newberg). Which takes us back to the first point. I think it should probably be something like this: if a park is in a metropolitan area (which has specific definitions set forth by the Census bureau) go with the actual closest incorporated city. If it is outside of a metro area (say Crater Lake National Park) then go with the "gateway city" option which would have the amenities mentioned, and which I think I have heard many cities mentioned as a gateway to this or that national park/monument so one might even be able to have a citation and mention in the body. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 06:49, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

531424 +++$+++  +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531424 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-29 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.209465780E09 +++$+++ Hi SeanMack, I hope you don't mind but I lightened this image on Commons, because it looked a bit too dark when I added it to the Did You Know section of the WA Portal. I'm happy if you want to revert or change my change. :) Regards, Somno (talk) 03:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ Hi SeanMack, I hope you don't mind but I lightened this image on Commons, because it looked a bit too dark when I added it to the Did You Know section of the WA Portal. I'm happy if you want to revert or change my change. :) Regards, Somno (talk) 03:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
531425 +++$+++ SeanMack +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531424 +++$+++ 531424 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.209492960E09 +++$+++ No worries at all.  +++$+++ :No worries at all. [[User:SeanMack|SeanMack]] ([[User talk:SeanMack|talk]]) 11:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

7137 +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-26 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.309114980E09 +++$+++ Hi! can you assess this article. [[Hema Malini]]. I expanded the article a bit and added more sources. Regards! -- +++$+++ Hi! can you assess this article. [[Hema Malini]]. I expanded the article a bit and added more sources. Regards! --[[User:Vensatry|<span style="color:#556655"><small>'''Commander'''</small></span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Vensatry|<span style="color:#556655"><small>'''(Ping Me)'''</small></span>]]</sub> 12:03, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
7138 +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7137 +++$+++ 7137 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.309374720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that! Also can you also re-assess these articles: [[K. Balachander]], [[Chiranjeevi]] and [[Jayaprada]]. I had been working on these articles for the past few months and expanded those considerably. -- +++$+++ : Thanks for that! Also can you also re-assess these articles: [[K. Balachander]], [[Chiranjeevi]] and [[Jayaprada]]. I had been working on these articles for the past few months and expanded those considerably. --[[User:Vensatry|<span style="color:#556655"><small>'''Commander'''</small></span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Vensatry|<span style="color:#556655"><small>'''(Ping Me)'''</small></span>]]</sub> 12:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
7139 +++$+++ Vensatry +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7137 +++$+++ 7138 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.309704300E09 +++$+++ I've nominated the article for a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography\/Peer_review\/Hema_Malini peer review]. Your comments and suggestions are most welcome. -- +++$+++ :: I've nominated the article for a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Peer_review/Hema_Malini peer review]. Your comments and suggestions are most welcome. --[[User:Vensatry|<span style="color:#556655"><small>'''Commander'''</small></span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Vensatry|<span style="color:#556655"><small>'''(Ping Me)'''</small></span>]]</sub> 07:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

531426 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-09 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.210330560E09 +++$+++ Looking at your recent contribs and cf'ing them with mine - such a drag - the slog of beating off the hordes - well done anyways  +++$+++ Looking at your recent contribs and cf'ing them with mine - such a drag - the slog of beating off the hordes - well done anyways [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 03:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
531427 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531426 +++$+++ 531426 +++$+++ 2008-05-09 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.210346820E09 +++$+++ It's what I do when I can't be bothered writing stuff. :)  +++$+++ :It's what I do when I can't be bothered writing stuff. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
531428 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531426 +++$+++ 531427 +++$+++ 2008-05-09 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.210351080E09 +++$+++ If you like eccentric referencing - check out [[Ten Pound Poms]] for a great variant on standard usage :(  +++$+++ ::If you like eccentric referencing - check out [[Ten Pound Poms]] for a great variant on standard usage :( [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 09:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
531429 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531426 +++$+++ 531427 +++$+++ 2008-05-10 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.210426980E09 +++$+++ '''Yes''' it would be good - try something like either the americas cup in wa art or licensing plates or something in oz -im about to be off for a while so enjoy! cheers  +++$+++ ::'''Yes''' it would be good - try something like either the americas cup in wa art or licensing plates or something in oz -im about to be off for a while so enjoy! cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 06:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

269283 +++$+++ Dan56 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-26 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.233033540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dan56|Dan56]] ([[User talk:Dan56|talk]]) 21:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
269284 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269283 +++$+++ 269283 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.233034800E09 +++$+++ I don't think that just adding an \"artwork section\" does it. Everything in the artwork section is demonstrated by the album cover. You have to give a good reason for violating someone's copyright on a high volume site like Wikipedia. (Also, you have an uncited quote in that para: Kimberley Chun of the San Francisco Bay Guardian wrote \"So what is a soul food taquer\xeda? Do you get a side of collard greens with your menudo?\") &mdash; +++$+++ :I don't think that just adding an "artwork section" does it. Everything in the artwork section is demonstrated by the album cover. You have to give a good reason for violating someone's copyright on a high volume site like Wikipedia. (Also, you have an uncited quote in that para: Kimberley Chun of the San Francisco Bay Guardian wrote "So what is a soul food taquería? Do you get a side of collard greens with your menudo?") &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

7140 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7140 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-02 07:38:00 +++$+++ 1.309617480E09 +++$+++ I have replied at the [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Carl_Prine|Carl Prine DYK]] and proposed an Alt hook for your review. Thank you. <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ I have replied at the [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Carl_Prine|Carl Prine DYK]] and proposed an Alt hook for your review. Thank you. <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 07:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
7141 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7140 +++$+++ 7140 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 09:16:00 +++$+++ 1.309623360E09 +++$+++ I moved around Henry Posner's name to give the hook a bit more flow. What do you think? I thought defining him as the owner would give it a bit more importance than just a random person with the company. <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ :I moved around Henry Posner's name to give the hook a bit more flow. What do you think? I thought defining him as the owner would give it a bit more importance than just a random person with the company. <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 09:16, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
7142 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7140 +++$+++ 7141 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.309701960E09 +++$+++ That's fine, as the hook is still less than 200 characters.  +++$+++ ::That's fine, as the hook is still less than 200 characters. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 07:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

269285 +++$+++ Dan56 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-27 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.233060840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dan56|Dan56]] ([[User talk:Dan56|talk]]) 04:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
269286 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269285 +++$+++ 269285 +++$+++ 2009-01-27 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.233097680E09 +++$+++ Great. I hope you do understand why Wikipedia must take this position. &mdash; +++$+++ :Great. I hope you do understand why Wikipedia must take this position. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

531430 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-10 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.210463220E09 +++$+++ I began the improvements - I'm not finished yet, but I already added and removed sections and added information as per your suggestions :)  +++$+++ I began the improvements - I'm not finished yet, but I already added and removed sections and added information as per your suggestions :) [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 16:47, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
531431 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531430 +++$+++ 531430 +++$+++ 2008-05-11 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.210503240E09 +++$+++ Cool, looks good so far. Just noticed something though - make sure you avoid one sentence paragraphs where possible, because good articles need to follow the [[WP:LAYOUT|Guide to layout]]. :)  +++$+++ :Cool, looks good so far. Just noticed something though - make sure you avoid one sentence paragraphs where possible, because good articles need to follow the [[WP:LAYOUT|Guide to layout]]. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

7143 +++$+++ Obornp +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7143 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.309813680E09 +++$+++ I'm working on adding Distribution paragraphs for all of the major telecoms in the US so that shareholders (private and public) can know how exactly each company plans to grow its sales.  There are many flavors of distribution in the marketplace and, in my opinion, it's very relevant to the topic at hand.  I noticed you lopped off my entire paragraph citing conflict of interest.  I'm not sure how you arrived at that conclusion since nothing here in WP is making me (or anyone else) any money.  My sole goal is to accurately describe the most important aspect of any company in America: distribution.  If you would help me find alternative language to make it seem less biased, I'd appreciate it.  The facts that I've cited therein are all reliable 3rd party sources.  Thanks, and happy 4th of July!   +++$+++ I'm working on adding Distribution paragraphs for all of the major telecoms in the US so that shareholders (private and public) can know how exactly each company plans to grow its sales.  There are many flavors of distribution in the marketplace and, in my opinion, it's very relevant to the topic at hand.  I noticed you lopped off my entire paragraph citing conflict of interest.  I'm not sure how you arrived at that conclusion since nothing here in WP is making me (or anyone else) any money.  My sole goal is to accurately describe the most important aspect of any company in America: distribution.  If you would help me find alternative language to make it seem less biased, I'd appreciate it.  The facts that I've cited therein are all reliable 3rd party sources.  Thanks, and happy 4th of July!  [[User:Obornp|Obornp]] ([[User talk:Obornp|talk]]) 14:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
7144 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7143 +++$+++ 7143 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.309820880E09 +++$+++ Look, COI was the last item listed, and it said \"likely\". Apparently the COI is not present, but please review the other policies\/guidelines cited. Then think about what you apparently are planning for all the telecoms and see if it is encyclopedic. As to reliable, third-party sources, that just gets you to the point where you ''might'' be able to use the material. Just because something is in a reliable source does not mean we can or even should use it, as then we still have [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:NOT]] that come into play. For instance, Sunset Magazine is a very reliable source, but since it is travel focused, the tips on traveling somewhere are something we would not include since Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Here, Wikipedia is not a investor's site (see [[WP:NOTGUIDE|#1]]), and thus a company's plan for growing sales is not really encyclopedic. Another issue if you plan to go ahead is that you need to review the [[WP:MOS|manual of style]] regarding capitalization of headers. Otherwise, sentences such as \"In 2008 a nationalized indirect channel was instituted to enable larger channel partners access to all Integra markets through a single point of contact\" come across as marketing by emphasizing the companies efforts to make it easier for their customers to work with them, and it uses buzz words such as ''single point of contact''. About the only thing salvageable is the first sentence added, which should be integrated elsewhere. But feel free to drop a note on the business WikiProject talk page for a broader discussion since this touches on more than just Integra.  +++$+++ :Look, COI was the last item listed, and it said "likely". Apparently the COI is not present, but please review the other policies/guidelines cited. Then think about what you apparently are planning for all the telecoms and see if it is encyclopedic. As to reliable, third-party sources, that just gets you to the point where you ''might'' be able to use the material. Just because something is in a reliable source does not mean we can or even should use it, as then we still have [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:NOT]] that come into play. For instance, Sunset Magazine is a very reliable source, but since it is travel focused, the tips on traveling somewhere are something we would not include since Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Here, Wikipedia is not a investor's site (see [[WP:NOTGUIDE|#1]]), and thus a company's plan for growing sales is not really encyclopedic. Another issue if you plan to go ahead is that you need to review the [[WP:MOS|manual of style]] regarding capitalization of headers. Otherwise, sentences such as "In 2008 a nationalized indirect channel was instituted to enable larger channel partners access to all Integra markets through a single point of contact" come across as marketing by emphasizing the companies efforts to make it easier for their customers to work with them, and it uses buzz words such as ''single point of contact''. About the only thing salvageable is the first sentence added, which should be integrated elsewhere. But feel free to drop a note on the business WikiProject talk page for a broader discussion since this touches on more than just Integra. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 16:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
7145 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7143 +++$+++ 7143 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.309842360E09 +++$+++ But the main problem with the article is basically a manual of style problem. There are not really inline citations (something required for GA and above articles), there are just footnotes (and those that exist are problematic as all but one have a problem with the punctuation preceding it; as in there should not be a space between period and the footnote. Next, there is really just one section, Life. For that amount of text, there should be at least one or two more sections, see [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (layout)]]. Then, the [[WP:LEDE]] is a single sentence, and for something this long it should be a solid paragraph, as what is currently there does not adequately summarize his life. Address these items, add an infobox, and work on the sentence flow and you will easily have a B class article.  +++$+++ :But the main problem with the article is basically a manual of style problem. There are not really inline citations (something required for GA and above articles), there are just footnotes (and those that exist are problematic as all but one have a problem with the punctuation preceding it; as in there should not be a space between period and the footnote. Next, there is really just one section, Life. For that amount of text, there should be at least one or two more sections, see [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (layout)]]. Then, the [[WP:LEDE]] is a single sentence, and for something this long it should be a solid paragraph, as what is currently there does not adequately summarize his life. Address these items, add an infobox, and work on the sentence flow and you will easily have a B class article. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 22:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

531432 +++$+++ JimDunning +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531432 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-11 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.210534200E09 +++$+++ Somno, it appears you did the GAN review for ''[[The Muppets' Wizard of Oz]]''. Would you mind taking a look at the discussions I initiated on the article's [[Talk:The Muppets' Wizard of Oz|Talk page]] regarding sources? I'm concerned that many of the sources do not support the statements to which they're attached. Some of the issues appear to have been raised by you during the review, but may not have been adequately addressed by the article's editors. If I'm missing or misinterpreting something, feel free to let me know. Thanks for your input and time.<br \/><span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px; color:#000000;\"><b> +++$+++ Somno, it appears you did the GAN review for ''[[The Muppets' Wizard of Oz]]''. Would you mind taking a look at the discussions I initiated on the article's [[Talk:The Muppets' Wizard of Oz|Talk page]] regarding sources? I'm concerned that many of the sources do not support the statements to which they're attached. Some of the issues appear to have been raised by you during the review, but may not have been adequately addressed by the article's editors. If I'm missing or misinterpreting something, feel free to let me know. Thanks for your input and time.<br /><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px; color:#000000;"><b>[[User:JimDunning|Jim Dunning]]</b> | [[User talk:JimDunning|<small>talk</small>]]</span> 12:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
531433 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531432 +++$+++ 531432 +++$+++ 2008-05-12 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.210583220E09 +++$+++ Hi JimDunning. The GA review for this article was a little frustrating, because some issues I brought up were dismissed, only to be brought up repeatedly in subsequent peer and FA reviews (reliable sources, whether DVD prices should be included and so on). I agree with you about sources - I didn't check that each one backed up what it cited, just a couple of them, and that they all worked. The article has definitely improved, but it would improve further if the feedback provided by reviewers was embraced and incorporated. I support all you've brought up on the article's talk page and will comment there shortly.  +++$+++ :Hi JimDunning. The GA review for this article was a little frustrating, because some issues I brought up were dismissed, only to be brought up repeatedly in subsequent peer and FA reviews (reliable sources, whether DVD prices should be included and so on). I agree with you about sources - I didn't check that each one backed up what it cited, just a couple of them, and that they all worked. The article has definitely improved, but it would improve further if the feedback provided by reviewers was embraced and incorporated. I support all you've brought up on the article's talk page and will comment there shortly. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
531434 +++$+++ JimDunning +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531432 +++$+++ 531433 +++$+++ 2008-05-12 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.210640100E09 +++$+++ I noticed that as well as I reviewed the peer review and FAC discussions. Many of the recommendations that the article's editor(s) claimed were accepted and executed were, in fact, never done. After I raised the initial source questions I did a more thorough review and found that substantial portions of the article are unsupported by the attached cites. So much so, that many statements probably are [[WP:OR]]. Not on a grand scale, certainly, but many statements may have been \"loosely\" written to make the prose interesting and to fill in \"gaps\" between supported statements. OR nonetheless. Unfortunately, once you remove those phrases, the quality of the writing suffers and the information content is noticeably diminished. That's why I raised the question of reassessment with you. Also, I'm fearful Limetolime may take my crticisms personally (as any of us might when it comes to an article in which we've invested a lot of effort). I've tried to tactfully (and gently) raise these concerns on his [[User talk:Limetolime#The Muppets.27 Wizard of Oz concerns|Talk page]], but I fear that the volume of issues may make it appear I'm landing on his work with both feet. Let's see what happens.<br \/><span style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px; color:#000000;\"><b> +++$+++ ::I noticed that as well as I reviewed the peer review and FAC discussions. Many of the recommendations that the article's editor(s) claimed were accepted and executed were, in fact, never done. After I raised the initial source questions I did a more thorough review and found that substantial portions of the article are unsupported by the attached cites. So much so, that many statements probably are [[WP:OR]]. Not on a grand scale, certainly, but many statements may have been "loosely" written to make the prose interesting and to fill in "gaps" between supported statements. OR nonetheless. Unfortunately, once you remove those phrases, the quality of the writing suffers and the information content is noticeably diminished. That's why I raised the question of reassessment with you. Also, I'm fearful Limetolime may take my crticisms personally (as any of us might when it comes to an article in which we've invested a lot of effort). I've tried to tactfully (and gently) raise these concerns on his [[User talk:Limetolime#The Muppets.27 Wizard of Oz concerns|Talk page]], but I fear that the volume of issues may make it appear I'm landing on his work with both feet. Let's see what happens.<br /><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px; color:#000000;"><b>[[User:JimDunning|Jim Dunning]]</b> | [[User talk:JimDunning|<small>talk</small>]]</span> 17:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
531435 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531432 +++$+++ 531434 +++$+++ 2008-05-13 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.210669440E09 +++$+++ The number of issues is a little worrying, but you're just trying to improve the article. My concerns are the Future developments section, DVD prices and ratings boxes being re-added without discussion and the tendency for the article to be [[WP:OWN|owned]] by one editor.  +++$+++ :::The number of issues is a little worrying, but you're just trying to improve the article. My concerns are the Future developments section, DVD prices and ratings boxes being re-added without discussion and the tendency for the article to be [[WP:OWN|owned]] by one editor. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

269290 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269290 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-28 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.233140520E09 +++$+++ I don't want to reply until you're sure you meant what you said.  Are you seriously saying that there are VPs of the US who are not notable?  That's what you just said! I'd rather discuss that here and give you an opportunity to edit.-- +++$+++ I don't want to reply until you're sure you meant what you said.  Are you seriously saying that there are VPs of the US who are not notable?  That's what you just said! I'd rather discuss that here and give you an opportunity to edit.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 03:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
269291 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269290 +++$+++ 269290 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.233141000E09 +++$+++ OK. I wasn't trying to stir up trouble. I just don't think this guy is main page material unless he has a great hook, and I don't see it in the article. But as far as FA is concerned, that is not necessary for an article to be FA  so I will not pursue those issues.  I certainly do not want to meddle in FA and was being provocative only.  &mdash; +++$+++ :OK. I wasn't trying to stir up trouble. I just don't think this guy is main page material unless he has a great hook, and I don't see it in the article. But as far as FA is concerned, that is not necessary for an article to be FA  so I will not pursue those issues.  I certainly do not want to meddle in FA and was being provocative only.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
269292 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269290 +++$+++ 269291 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.233141120E09 +++$+++ I don't have any plans to nominate this for TFA.  No need to apologize, I invited you in.  There are plenty of FAs that will never be featured front page.  All I like to do is keep stamping out FA's, and to see SOME of them front page.  I'm not greedy and people would get steamed anyway if I had too  many TFA's.  It's cool.-- +++$+++ ::I don't have any plans to nominate this for TFA.  No need to apologize, I invited you in.  There are plenty of FAs that will never be featured front page.  All I like to do is keep stamping out FA's, and to see SOME of them front page.  I'm not greedy and people would get steamed anyway if I had too  many TFA's.  It's cool.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 03:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
269293 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269290 +++$+++ 269292 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.233141540E09 +++$+++ OK. Sorry. Well, at least I stirred up some publicity for you on FAC.  You can respond and expound. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::OK. Sorry. Well, at least I stirred up some publicity for you on FAC.  You can respond and expound. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
269294 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269290 +++$+++ 269293 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.233141780E09 +++$+++ I said, it's cool.  No problemo.  This one may not pass anyway, due to the heavy reliance on the \"Letters\" book.  No one has ever written a bio of him, which is a pity.-- +++$+++ ::::I said, it's cool.  No problemo.  This one may not pass anyway, due to the heavy reliance on the "Letters" book.  No one has ever written a bio of him, which is a pity.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 03:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

525479 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525479 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-10 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.189412460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for outlining [[levosalbutamol]].  +++$+++ Thanks for outlining [[levosalbutamol]]. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 01:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
525480 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525479 +++$+++ 525479 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.189412580E09 +++$+++ And thank you for moving the article to its proper location. -- +++$+++ :And thank you for moving the article to its proper location. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
525481 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525479 +++$+++ 525480 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.189413180E09 +++$+++ [[User:Galaxiaad|Galaxiaad]] suggested it, actually. I had the article in my Watchlist and hadn't even noticed.  +++$+++ ::[[User:Galaxiaad|Galaxiaad]] suggested it, actually. I had the article in my Watchlist and hadn't even noticed. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 01:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

531436 +++$+++ AgnosticPreachersKid +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-14 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.210760040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing [[Old Stone House (Washington, D.C.)]]. Let me know where improvements can be made and I'll correct them ASAP. Cheers.  +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing [[Old Stone House (Washington, D.C.)]]. Let me know where improvements can be made and I'll correct them ASAP. Cheers. [[User:AgnosticPreachersKid|<b><font color="blue">'''APK'''</font></b>]] [[User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid|<font color="red"><sup><small>'''yada yada'''</small></sup></font>]] 03:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
531437 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531436 +++$+++ 531436 +++$+++ 2008-05-14 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.210760280E09 +++$+++ Wow, you're quick! I'm just reviewing it now, but I can tell you already that it's very close to GA and any suggestions should be easy to implement. :)  +++$+++ :Wow, you're quick! I'm just reviewing it now, but I can tell you already that it's very close to GA and any suggestions should be easy to implement. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
531438 +++$+++ AgnosticPreachersKid +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531436 +++$+++ 531437 +++$+++ 2008-05-14 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.210766280E09 +++$+++ Gracias. I'm quick because I spend waaaay too much time on this site. Where's my WikiPaycheck? Jimbo owes me overtime! :-) Anyway, as mentioned on the article's talk page I'm not feeling well (fever and nausea are ''never'' fun), but will try to work on it when possible over the next day or so. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::Gracias. I'm quick because I spend waaaay too much time on this site. Where's my WikiPaycheck? Jimbo owes me overtime! :-) Anyway, as mentioned on the article's talk page I'm not feeling well (fever and nausea are ''never'' fun), but will try to work on it when possible over the next day or so. Cheers. [[User:AgnosticPreachersKid|<b><font color="blue">'''APK'''</font></b>]] [[User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid|<font color="red"><sup><small>'''yada yada'''</small></sup></font>]] 04:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
531439 +++$+++ AgnosticPreachersKid +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531436 +++$+++ 531438 +++$+++ 2008-05-15 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.210867920E09 +++$+++ I've worked on improvements, but there is still one issue explained [[Talk:Old Stone House (Washington, D.C.)|here]]. When I first wrote the article I spent 2 hours trying to find the origin of the house's name! I thought that would be one of the easiest things to find. ''bangs head on wall'' LOL. Cheers.  +++$+++ :::I've worked on improvements, but there is still one issue explained [[Talk:Old Stone House (Washington, D.C.)|here]]. When I first wrote the article I spent 2 hours trying to find the origin of the house's name! I thought that would be one of the easiest things to find. ''bangs head on wall'' LOL. Cheers. [[User:AgnosticPreachersKid|<b><font color="blue">'''APK'''</font></b>]] [[User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid|<font color="red"><sup><small>'''yada yada'''</small></sup></font>]] 09:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

175954 +++$+++ Sreed888 +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ 175954 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-06 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.257511560E09 +++$+++ I noticed you made some changes from Gauss' to Gauss's. I found that Wikipedia style allows either apostrophe alone or apostrophe s as long as it's used consistently for all such possessives in each article. However, I can't find a rule that addresses the plural of a name that ends in two s's. I'd like to find out about this rule and wondered if you would share your source for it? I also wondered if you'd checked the articles where you made the changes to ensure they were using the same rule you are. Thanks  +++$+++ I noticed you made some changes from Gauss' to Gauss's. I found that Wikipedia style allows either apostrophe alone or apostrophe s as long as it's used consistently for all such possessives in each article. However, I can't find a rule that addresses the plural of a name that ends in two s's. I'd like to find out about this rule and wondered if you would share your source for it? I also wondered if you'd checked the articles where you made the changes to ensure they were using the same rule you are. Thanks [[User:Sreed888|Jojalozzo]] ([[User talk:Sreed888|talk]]) 04:46, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
175955 +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ 175954 +++$+++ 175954 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.257529860E09 +++$+++ Regretfully I must say it had more to do with me being too hasty. I looked at the ''Gauss's law'' and ''Gauss's law for magnetism'' articles and presumed there must be a consensus for the spelling. This version simply felt more suitable as well, I guess. It was only after I found the [[Gauss' law for gravity]] article, which was consistently using the opposite version, that I started to really wonder, if there indeed was a consensus. This topic has been discussed in [[Talk:Gauss's law#Move]] and [[Talk:Gauss's law#Gauss's law]]. They seem to prefer ''Gauss's'', but mostly as a personal preference. After that I decided to stop, since both versions are indeed acceptable and the ''Gauss' law for gravity'' was using it consistently as well. So I apologize for my thoughtlessness, if you disagree with my edits. \u2014 +++$+++ :Regretfully I must say it had more to do with me being too hasty. I looked at the ''Gauss's law'' and ''Gauss's law for magnetism'' articles and presumed there must be a consensus for the spelling. This version simply felt more suitable as well, I guess. It was only after I found the [[Gauss' law for gravity]] article, which was consistently using the opposite version, that I started to really wonder, if there indeed was a consensus. This topic has been discussed in [[Talk:Gauss's law#Move]] and [[Talk:Gauss's law#Gauss's law]]. They seem to prefer ''Gauss's'', but mostly as a personal preference. After that I decided to stop, since both versions are indeed acceptable and the ''Gauss' law for gravity'' was using it consistently as well. So I apologize for my thoughtlessness, if you disagree with my edits. —[[User:Quibik|Quibik]] ([[User talk:Quibik#top|talk]]) 09:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
175956 +++$+++ Sreed888 +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ 175954 +++$+++ 175954 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.257556800E09 +++$+++ No apology required. I appreciate your attempts to get things right but was concerned that your broad approach may have overlooked the different styles adopted in different articles. I also found that the rules talked about possessives for nouns ending in a single 's' and hoped you had found one that addressed the double 's' ending.  +++$+++ :No apology required. I appreciate your attempts to get things right but was concerned that your broad approach may have overlooked the different styles adopted in different articles. I also found that the rules talked about possessives for nouns ending in a single 's' and hoped you had found one that addressed the double 's' ending. [[User:Sreed888|Jojalozzo]] ([[User talk:Sreed888|talk]]) 17:20, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

7150 +++$+++ Bobbyc3aop +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311260760E09 +++$+++ However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words.  While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]]. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.  Thank you. <!-- Inserted via Template:Nothanks-sd -->  +++$+++ However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words.  While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]]. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.  Thank you. <!-- Inserted via Template:Nothanks-sd --> [[User:Bobbyc3aop|Bobbyc3aop]] ([[User talk:Bobbyc3aop|talk]]) 08:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
7151 +++$+++ Tedder +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7150 +++$+++ 7150 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311378960E09 +++$+++ I guess the legal blustering was because the COI user Bobbyc3aop wanted a newer version of the logo. Weird way to go about it.  +++$+++ :I guess the legal blustering was because the COI user Bobbyc3aop wanted a newer version of the logo. Weird way to go about it. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 16:56, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
7152 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7150 +++$+++ 7151 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.311427980E09 +++$+++ I know. Weird. Makes me think this is one of those people who shows up somewhere new and is unfamiliar with anything and instead of asking around or being respectful, just makes an ass out of themselves. Or is the new neighbor who moves in and starts mowing their lawn at 6 am Saturday morning in their pajamas as they are only concerned with themselves, etc.  +++$+++ ::I know. Weird. Makes me think this is one of those people who shows up somewhere new and is unfamiliar with anything and instead of asking around or being respectful, just makes an ass out of themselves. Or is the new neighbor who moves in and starts mowing their lawn at 6 am Saturday morning in their pajamas as they are only concerned with themselves, etc. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 06:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
7153 +++$+++ Valfontis +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7150 +++$+++ 7152 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.311467580E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/wweek.com\/portland\/article-17757-bad_neighbor.html Reminds me of this guy].  +++$+++ :::[http://wweek.com/portland/article-17757-bad_neighbor.html Reminds me of this guy]. [[User:Valfontis|Valfontis]] ([[User talk:Valfontis|talk]]) 17:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

269295 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-27 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.233055920E09 +++$+++ Thanks for all your help! It looks like I need to learn my writing style better since my main problem seems to be copy-editing. Thanks again with the article review!!  +++$+++ Thanks for all your help! It looks like I need to learn my writing style better since my main problem seems to be copy-editing. Thanks again with the article review!! [[User:Andrzejbanas|Andrzejbanas]] ([[User talk:Andrzejbanas|talk]]) 03:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
269296 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269295 +++$+++ 269295 +++$+++ 2009-01-27 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.233056340E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. Yes, your information is sound. Just the occasional slip up in prose style. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :You are very welcome. Yes, your information is sound. Just the occasional slip up in prose style. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

531440 +++$+++ Derek.cashman +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531440 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-14 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.210819740E09 +++$+++ I see you've tagged this article for review. I took a brief look at it, and unfortunately, it's nowhere near meeting the [[WP:WIAGA|GA criteria]]. Probably start-class at best. I added a few comments to it, but held off on failing so that you could add your comments. I guess if you wanna put it on hold, it's up to you, but there's so much work to do to get it up to standards, that failing and subsequent renomination is probably the better route at this point.  +++$+++ I see you've tagged this article for review. I took a brief look at it, and unfortunately, it's nowhere near meeting the [[WP:WIAGA|GA criteria]]. Probably start-class at best. I added a few comments to it, but held off on failing so that you could add your comments. I guess if you wanna put it on hold, it's up to you, but there's so much work to do to get it up to standards, that failing and subsequent renomination is probably the better route at this point. [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 19:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
531441 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531440 +++$+++ 531440 +++$+++ 2008-05-15 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.210838340E09 +++$+++ I agree, but I still want to properly review it and give the editor(s) my suggestions. Thanks :)  +++$+++ :I agree, but I still want to properly review it and give the editor(s) my suggestions. Thanks :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 00:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
531442 +++$+++ Postoak +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531440 +++$+++ 531441 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.211006880E09 +++$+++ Hello Somno, I made some revisions to this article. Perhaps it is in better shape, but I look forward to your comments to improve the article. Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Hello Somno, I made some revisions to this article. Perhaps it is in better shape, but I look forward to your comments to improve the article. Thanks! [[User:Postoak|Postoak]] ([[User talk:Postoak|talk]]) 23:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

269297 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-27 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.233092580E09 +++$+++ I now understand completely your complaints about DYK. I'm sorry if I was ever curt about it, I tried not to be. Ah well, they have lost yet another valuable contributor in that area in me. -- +++$+++ I now understand completely your complaints about DYK. I'm sorry if I was ever curt about it, I tried not to be. Ah well, they have lost yet another valuable contributor in that area in me. --[[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 13:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
269298 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269297 +++$+++ 269297 +++$+++ 2009-01-27 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.233097860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for understanding and for contacting me to let me know. What changed your mind?  &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks for understanding and for contacting me to let me know. What changed your mind?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

7155 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7155 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311378540E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you recently assessed the above as C-class, and was curious to know why you didn't rated it B-class. Comparing it with other B-class articles such as [[Legal system of the Republic of Turkey]], it's unclear to me what's missing. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you recently assessed the above as C-class, and was curious to know why you didn't rated it B-class. Comparing it with other B-class articles such as [[Legal system of the Republic of Turkey]], it's unclear to me what's missing. Thanks. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 16:49, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
7156 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7155 +++$+++ 7155 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311427740E09 +++$+++ The Saudi article is superior to the Turkish one, and the Saudi one is very close to B status. But the Turkish one is really a C class if not start class article. Whoever assessed the Turkish one either did not know what the criteria was, or it was such a long time ago that it was B class at that time (C class is only about 3-4 years old, and in general the standards have been raised in the last 5 years). For me, why I think the Saudi article is still C class is mostly with the [[WP:LEAD|lede]]. For an article this size, the lede should be bigger. And more importantly, the lede comes across more as analysis of the system instead of a summary of the article. The other important issue, but less notable, is there are a fair amount of criticisms about the system that lack citations. My guess is that many of the sources already cited might cover them, but anything controversial should have an inline citation at the end of the sentence. The most glaring example is in the section \"The courts and the judiciary\" in the last paragraph. Lastly, many of the paragraphs are a bit long (the two I counted had 7 and 9 sentences) and could use breaking up into smaller paragraphs. These becomes more of an issue with run-on sentences such as \"The main complaint reportedly made by Saudis privately is that judges, who have wide discretion in interpreting the Sharia, have no knowledge, and are often contemptuous, of the modern world.\" That should be two sentences at a minimum. Long paragraphs and sentences effect readability. But address the lede and add-in some more citations for the controversial items and it is B class. Address the other items and I would suggest it would pass as a GA.  +++$+++ :The Saudi article is superior to the Turkish one, and the Saudi one is very close to B status. But the Turkish one is really a C class if not start class article. Whoever assessed the Turkish one either did not know what the criteria was, or it was such a long time ago that it was B class at that time (C class is only about 3-4 years old, and in general the standards have been raised in the last 5 years). For me, why I think the Saudi article is still C class is mostly with the [[WP:LEAD|lede]]. For an article this size, the lede should be bigger. And more importantly, the lede comes across more as analysis of the system instead of a summary of the article. The other important issue, but less notable, is there are a fair amount of criticisms about the system that lack citations. My guess is that many of the sources already cited might cover them, but anything controversial should have an inline citation at the end of the sentence. The most glaring example is in the section "The courts and the judiciary" in the last paragraph. Lastly, many of the paragraphs are a bit long (the two I counted had 7 and 9 sentences) and could use breaking up into smaller paragraphs. These becomes more of an issue with run-on sentences such as "The main complaint reportedly made by Saudis privately is that judges, who have wide discretion in interpreting the Sharia, have no knowledge, and are often contemptuous, of the modern world." That should be two sentences at a minimum. Long paragraphs and sentences effect readability. But address the lede and add-in some more citations for the controversial items and it is B class. Address the other items and I would suggest it would pass as a GA. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 06:29, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
7157 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7155 +++$+++ 7156 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311435540E09 +++$+++ Thanks that's very helpful. I'll work on the Lede, paragraphs and run-on sentences. However, I don't understand the comment on in-line citations. I'm very careful on that and have made sure that everything in the article has a citation. The way I work is that everything in the text is covered by an in-line citation back to the beginning of the paragraph or the previous in-line citation. In the example you give, the last para of Courts and judiciary, it is all derived from the two cited Economist articles. Do you see something that's not covered in those articles? I notice you said that the citation should be \"at the end of the sentence\". But that would mean that where one citation is used for several sentences or a whole paragraph that the same citation would be repeated several times consecutively. That surely isn't good practice?  +++$+++ ::Thanks that's very helpful. I'll work on the Lede, paragraphs and run-on sentences. However, I don't understand the comment on in-line citations. I'm very careful on that and have made sure that everything in the article has a citation. The way I work is that everything in the text is covered by an in-line citation back to the beginning of the paragraph or the previous in-line citation. In the example you give, the last para of Courts and judiciary, it is all derived from the two cited Economist articles. Do you see something that's not covered in those articles? I notice you said that the citation should be "at the end of the sentence". But that would mean that where one citation is used for several sentences or a whole paragraph that the same citation would be repeated several times consecutively. That surely isn't good practice? [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 08:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
7158 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7155 +++$+++ 7157 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311467940E09 +++$+++ With the inline citations, I know that is a common point people make, but that is really based on experience with writing academic papers. Wikipedia is not an academic paper. Think of it this way, as the reader, how would I know that the citation four sentences later is what sources the information I am reading now? Only the writer knows this with any certainty. And here, you are not the writer, but one of many writers with a potential of even more writers in the future. Which leads to the next major issue, how Wikipedia works. Unlike an academic paper, Wikipedia can and does change. So, in two years where someone inserts new information into the article, how does anyone still know that the citation four sentences down and two citations away still supports the sentence you are reading? It would be nice to think we will all still be editors in two years and we could clarify, but even if we are still here in two, three years, will you still remember which citations support which bits of information? Especially where not all sources are online and easily checked by the reader. This issue alone would not prevent it from getting to B, but could be an issue at GA or FA.  +++$+++ :::With the inline citations, I know that is a common point people make, but that is really based on experience with writing academic papers. Wikipedia is not an academic paper. Think of it this way, as the reader, how would I know that the citation four sentences later is what sources the information I am reading now? Only the writer knows this with any certainty. And here, you are not the writer, but one of many writers with a potential of even more writers in the future. Which leads to the next major issue, how Wikipedia works. Unlike an academic paper, Wikipedia can and does change. So, in two years where someone inserts new information into the article, how does anyone still know that the citation four sentences down and two citations away still supports the sentence you are reading? It would be nice to think we will all still be editors in two years and we could clarify, but even if we are still here in two, three years, will you still remember which citations support which bits of information? Especially where not all sources are online and easily checked by the reader. This issue alone would not prevent it from getting to B, but could be an issue at GA or FA. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 17:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
7159 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7155 +++$+++ 7158 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.311471780E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to make sure I've got what you're saying because I don't remember seeing a Wikipedia article with citations in that way.  +++$+++ ::::I just wanted to make sure I've got what you're saying because I don't remember seeing a Wikipedia article with citations in that way. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 18:43, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
7160 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7155 +++$+++ 7159 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311472560E09 +++$+++ On the key points, yes (note you have the full cite twice in case you copy and paste this into the article). And yes, you do not always come across this, but the majority of articles out there are still poorly sourced in general (see the Turkisk article for reference). You would find this more often with the GA and FA articles.  +++$+++ :::::On the key points, yes (note you have the full cite twice in case you copy and paste this into the article). And yes, you do not always come across this, but the majority of articles out there are still poorly sourced in general (see the Turkisk article for reference). You would find this more often with the GA and FA articles. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 18:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
7161 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7155 +++$+++ 7160 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311476280E09 +++$+++ OK, I'll work on it. I'm the only editor whose worked on it so far (I created the article earlier in the week) and am very familiar with all the sources so it won't take me long to do - a day or so. Would you mind taking another look at it once I've made all the changes?  +++$+++ ::::::OK, I'll work on it. I'm the only editor whose worked on it so far (I created the article earlier in the week) and am very familiar with all the sources so it won't take me long to do - a day or so. Would you mind taking another look at it once I've made all the changes? [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 19:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
7162 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7155 +++$+++ 7161 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311515940E09 +++$+++ Sure, just drop me a note here. And again, nice article (though I was curious, do they have anything such as municipal codes?).  +++$+++ :::::::Sure, just drop me a note here. And again, nice article (though I was curious, do they have anything such as municipal codes?). [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 06:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
7163 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7155 +++$+++ 7162 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.311831360E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've made the changes as you suggested (I think). Could you take a look? I've not seen anything about municipal codes in the sources, all of which only refer to royal decrees and sharia. The provinces are governed by princes from the royal family who act as \"mini-kings\" and their word is law, so to speak. But I don't think it's as formal as amounting to local codes. Rule of law is still a fairly fluid concept there.  +++$+++ ::::::::Hi, I've made the changes as you suggested (I think). Could you take a look? I've not seen anything about municipal codes in the sources, all of which only refer to royal decrees and sharia. The provinces are governed by princes from the royal family who act as "mini-kings" and their word is law, so to speak. But I don't think it's as formal as amounting to local codes. Rule of law is still a fairly fluid concept there. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 22:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
7164 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7155 +++$+++ 7163 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.312040580E09 +++$+++ Nice work, I've upped it to B. That's as high as it can go with a formal review process via GA or FA. I think it is pretty much ready for GA.  +++$+++ :::::::::Nice work, I've upped it to B. That's as high as it can go with a formal review process via GA or FA. I think it is pretty much ready for GA. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 08:43, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
7165 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7155 +++$+++ 7164 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312042200E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Is there a country \"Legal system of\" or \"Law of\" you could recommend to take a look at for best practice? I looked at the WikiProject Law page and couldn't see any country GAs\/FAs.  +++$+++ ::::::::::Thanks. Is there a country "Legal system of" or "Law of" you could recommend to take a look at for best practice? I looked at the WikiProject Law page and couldn't see any country GAs/FAs. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 09:10, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

394409 +++$+++ Honesroc +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.311927360E09 +++$+++ I cleaned up APUS as best as my abilities would allow, and was wondering if you could give it a look-over.  Thanks!-- +++$+++ I cleaned up APUS as best as my abilities would allow, and was wondering if you could give it a look-over.  Thanks!--[[User:Honesroc|Honesroc]] ([[User talk:Honesroc|talk]]) 01:16, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
394410 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.312089300E09 +++$+++ I saw a double issue with the quotation in that sentence. Who wrote that about the music of Charles Ives and who applied those words to the Grey Friars? When you quote someone else's remarks, you need to identify the speaker. You have now nicely answered the first question (who said this about Charles Ives), but the second question is still unanswered. -- +++$+++ :I saw a double issue with the quotation in that sentence. Who wrote that about the music of Charles Ives and who applied those words to the Grey Friars? When you quote someone else's remarks, you need to identify the speaker. You have now nicely answered the first question (who said this about Charles Ives), but the second question is still unanswered. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady#top|talk]]) 22:15, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
394411 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.312093560E09 +++$+++ Yes, that resolves the concern I expressed via [[:Template:Whosequote]], but I confess to being puzzled by your radical changes to the text of the section... -- +++$+++ :Yes, that resolves the concern I expressed via [[:Template:Whosequote]], but I confess to being puzzled by your radical changes to the text of the section... --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady#top|talk]]) 23:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
394412 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312150860E09 +++$+++ PS - Is there a reason why you are editing anonymously, instead of using your login? -- +++$+++ :PS - Is there a reason why you are editing anonymously, instead of using your login? --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady#top|talk]]) 15:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
394413 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.312179900E09 +++$+++ Sorry to hear you can't log in from that laptop. I've edited a few times from IPs when I was using a borrowed computer, but only to do things like fix typos in articles I happened to look at, nothing substantial. Is it not possible for you to request your password? -- +++$+++ :Sorry to hear you can't log in from that laptop. I've edited a few times from IPs when I was using a borrowed computer, but only to do things like fix typos in articles I happened to look at, nothing substantial. Is it not possible for you to request your password? --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady#top|talk]]) 23:25, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
394414 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312263960E09 +++$+++ I wish I could help with that! -- +++$+++ :I wish I could help with that! --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady#top|talk]]) 22:46, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
394415 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ 394409 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.312485180E09 +++$+++ I agree. The article is interesting, it appears to be well-sourced, and it looks like an encyclopedia article, not an insider's guide or an expos\xe9. Hurray! As for improvement, I suggest that you work on getting sources for more of the past members -- and try to find [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] in lieu of dubious attributions like En.academic.ru. -- +++$+++ :I agree. The article is interesting, it appears to be well-sourced, and it looks like an encyclopedia article, not an insider's guide or an exposé. Hurray! As for improvement, I suggest that you work on getting sources for more of the past members -- and try to find [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] in lieu of dubious attributions like En.academic.ru. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady#top|talk]]) 12:13, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

269304 +++$+++ Dan56 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-29 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.233221460E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dan56|Dan56]] ([[User talk:Dan56|talk]]) 01:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
269305 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269304 +++$+++ 269304 +++$+++ 2009-01-29 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.233221820E09 +++$+++ A really good place to ask about sources is the  [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources\/Noticeboard]]. Usually you get some very good answers quickly (within a few hours or so). I wanted to ask you, have you ever thought about submitting one of your very best articles to [[WP:FAC]]? It can be a gruelling process, but you will learn lots about article writing. &mdash; +++$+++ :A really good place to ask about sources is the  [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard]]. Usually you get some very good answers quickly (within a few hours or so). I wanted to ask you, have you ever thought about submitting one of your very best articles to [[WP:FAC]]? It can be a gruelling process, but you will learn lots about article writing. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

269306 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269306 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-29 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.233293220E09 +++$+++ From what I have seen, GA can be the \"last step\" for an article in which very little information is available; any article can become a GA. I will ask at [[WT:GAN]] but if there is concensus in my favor, would you mind unfailing it? ~<strong>''''' +++$+++ From what I have seen, GA can be the "last step" for an article in which very little information is available; any article can become a GA. I will ask at [[WT:GAN]] but if there is concensus in my favor, would you mind unfailing it? ~<strong>'''''[[User:Editorofthewiki|<font color="#F900">EDDY</font>]]'' <sup>([[User talk:Editorofthewiki#top|<font color="Green">talk</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Editorofthewiki|<font color="Green">contribs</font>]]/[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Editorofthewiki|<font color="Green">editor review</font>]])</sup>'''</span></strong>~ 21:27, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
269307 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269306 +++$+++ 269306 +++$+++ 2009-01-29 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.233293880E09 +++$+++ If others think it should pass, then you can nominate it again right away. (There is no time limit, you renominated it immediately, and the fact it failed once does not matter at all.) Then either I or someone else can pass it. It is no stigma in failing once. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :If others think it should pass, then you can nominate it again right away. (There is no time limit, you renominated it immediately, and the fact it failed once does not matter at all.) Then either I or someone else can pass it. It is no stigma in failing once. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

531452 +++$+++ Dihydrogen Monoxide +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-22 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.211471580E09 +++$+++ Have some kudos; you're doing great! '' +++$+++ Have some kudos; you're doing great! ''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|dihydrogen monoxide]]'' <small>([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|H<sub>2</sub>O]])</small> 08:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
531453 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531452 +++$+++ 531452 +++$+++ 2008-05-22 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.211471820E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that means a lot. I'm trying my best. :)  +++$+++ :Thanks, that means a lot. I'm trying my best. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

525482 +++$+++ Hovea +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-11 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.189508280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Hovea|Hovea]] 03:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
525483 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525482 +++$+++ 525482 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.189539000E09 +++$+++ I looked through the edit history on that page, but had a hard time figuring out who removed what you added. It looks like your response was appropriate (asking on the talk page), and there has been no objection so far, so you may want to try adding it again. -- +++$+++ :I looked through the edit history on that page, but had a hard time figuring out who removed what you added. It looks like your response was appropriate (asking on the talk page), and there has been no objection so far, so you may want to try adding it again. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 12:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

7166 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7166 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.311512100E09 +++$+++ Your reverting a verifiable, reliable secondary source from Google Books which I added while retaining less reliable offline unverifiable references (both of which appear to be newspaper reports) does not make sense to me. Do you really prefer AGF to \"good to go\" in DYK reviews? I dont care for your retaining or reverting my edit but your motive seemed strange to me.  +++$+++ Your reverting a verifiable, reliable secondary source from Google Books which I added while retaining less reliable offline unverifiable references (both of which appear to be newspaper reports) does not make sense to me. Do you really prefer AGF to "good to go" in DYK reviews? I dont care for your retaining or reverting my edit but your motive seemed strange to me. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 05:55, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
7167 +++$+++ Valfontis +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7166 +++$+++ 7166 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.311515700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Valfontis|Valfontis]] ([[User talk:Valfontis|talk]]) 06:55, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
7168 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7166 +++$+++ 7167 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311515940E09 +++$+++ What she said, and as I just noted on your talk page.  +++$+++ ::What she said, and as I just noted on your talk page. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 06:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
7169 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7166 +++$+++ 7168 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.311517620E09 +++$+++ Obviously a case of not doing due diligence on my part. Thanks for the clarification, the both of you. Happy editing about Oregon issues! :)  +++$+++ :::Obviously a case of not doing due diligence on my part. Thanks for the clarification, the both of you. Happy editing about Oregon issues! :) [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 07:27, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

614568 +++$+++ 85.75.233.92 +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-14 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.158225120E09 +++$+++ Hello there. Why you reverted my edit in [[gyros]]? -- +++$+++ Hello there. Why you reverted my edit in [[gyros]]? --[[User:85.75.233.92|85.75.233.92]] 02:12, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
614569 +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614568 +++$+++ 614568 +++$+++ 2006-09-14 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.158235260E09 +++$+++ I felt that it read better before you changed it, and it included the Grrek and Turkish names. -- +++$+++ *I felt that it read better before you changed it, and it included the Grrek and Turkish names. --[[User:Daniel Olsen|Daniel Olsen]] 05:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

531457 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-29 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.212083640E09 +++$+++ It may be me but i didnt think that news in the west constituted a linkable item from the portal - I may well be very wrong but I thought it might link to a section of our articles - rather than outside wikiedpia  +++$+++ It may be me but i didnt think that news in the west constituted a linkable item from the portal - I may well be very wrong but I thought it might link to a section of our articles - rather than outside wikiedpia [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 10:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
531458 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531457 +++$+++ 531457 +++$+++ 2008-05-29 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.212100920E09 +++$+++ That's what I thought at first too, but a look at the [[Portal:Western Australia\/Western Australia news\/Archive|archives]], and the lack of specifics in the portal guidelines led me to believe otherwise. The ideal would be to link to relevant items on Wikinews, but that's hopeless ([http:\/\/en.wikinews.org\/wiki\/Portal:Australia]) and I didn't want to commit myself to updating Wikinews! :)  +++$+++ :That's what I thought at first too, but a look at the [[Portal:Western Australia/Western Australia news/Archive|archives]], and the lack of specifics in the portal guidelines led me to believe otherwise. The ideal would be to link to relevant items on Wikinews, but that's hopeless ([http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Portal:Australia]) and I didn't want to commit myself to updating Wikinews! :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 15:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
531459 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531457 +++$+++ 531458 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.212576720E09 +++$+++ Gawd - youre brave - some prefer to be more neutral and ambiguous - take care with that level of exposure :| - I mean I prefer landscapes for my own ambiguity - cheers and well good luck :|  +++$+++ ::Gawd - youre brave - some prefer to be more neutral and ambiguous - take care with that level of exposure :| - I mean I prefer landscapes for my own ambiguity - cheers and well good luck :| [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 03:52, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
531460 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531457 +++$+++ 531459 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.212577020E09 +++$+++ I just got sick of being referred to as male. I'm not a fan of the \"this user is female\" userbox, and I wasn't putting up a photo to maintain some level of anonymity, so that's my compromise. I'm far from an artist, so the sketch only vaguely resembles me. :)  +++$+++ :::I just got sick of being referred to as male. I'm not a fan of the "this user is female" userbox, and I wasn't putting up a photo to maintain some level of anonymity, so that's my compromise. I'm far from an artist, so the sketch only vaguely resembles me. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
531461 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531457 +++$+++ 531458 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.212577260E09 +++$+++ Well youre amongst an excellent group of oz eds of your gender - I would say overall more helpful, more steadily productive and more considerate than the majority of the lot that i belong to :|  +++$+++ ::Well youre amongst an excellent group of oz eds of your gender - I would say overall more helpful, more steadily productive and more considerate than the majority of the lot that i belong to :| [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 04:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

7171 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7171 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.311680580E09 +++$+++ }}  [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 04:43, 26 July 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ }}  [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 04:43, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
7172 +++$+++ Steven Walling +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7171 +++$+++ 7171 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311681360E09 +++$+++ Highly entertaining and edifying article. Nice work. :) <font style=\"font-family:Palatino, Georgia, serif;\"> +++$+++ :Highly entertaining and edifying article. Nice work. :) <font style="font-family:Palatino, Georgia, serif;">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[User talk:Steven Walling|<span style="color: #8080b0">talk</span>]]</font>  04:56, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
7173 +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ Aboutmovies +++$+++ 7171 +++$+++ 7172 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.311765780E09 +++$+++ Thanks, and glad you enjoyed it.  +++$+++ ::Thanks, and glad you enjoyed it. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] ([[User talk:Aboutmovies#top|talk]]) 04:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

269316 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269316 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-30 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.233318120E09 +++$+++ (undent) No need to get depressed. No need to spend any time at all&mdash;not even a minute&mdash;thinking about  the individual editors. Doing so is self-defeating; just rolling thoughts around in my mind that make me unhappy is... just a way to make myself unhappy. It accomplishes nothing else. So I don't let myself think those thoughts, simply by mentally labeling\/dismissing them as self-defeating. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ (undent) No need to get depressed. No need to spend any time at all&mdash;not even a minute&mdash;thinking about  the individual editors. Doing so is self-defeating; just rolling thoughts around in my mind that make me unhappy is... just a way to make myself unhappy. It accomplishes nothing else. So I don't let myself think those thoughts, simply by mentally labeling/dismissing them as self-defeating. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 04:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
269317 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269316 +++$+++ 269316 +++$+++ 2009-01-30 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.233318240E09 +++$+++ It's a hard lesson, here. &mdash; +++$+++ :It's a hard lesson, here. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
269318 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269316 +++$+++ 269317 +++$+++ 2009-01-30 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.233318720E09 +++$+++ Yay! Hard lessons are almost always the most valuable ones&mdash;else everyone on the planet would be height-weight-proportional (I definitely am NOT; am on Day 3 of my latest commitment to jogging), healthy, non-smoking, etc etc. :-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ :: Yay! Hard lessons are almost always the most valuable ones&mdash;else everyone on the planet would be height-weight-proportional (I definitely am NOT; am on Day 3 of my latest commitment to jogging), healthy, non-smoking, etc etc. :-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 04:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

531462 +++$+++ Sa.vakilian +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-03 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.212486840E09 +++$+++ Hi, I found you're reviewing the article while there is GA tag on the the page. Unfortunately the article has some problems from technical viewpoint. I asked another Muslim wikipedian to tell us his viewpoint. Can you wait to discuss on it more.--<font face=\"monospace\"> +++$+++ Hi, I found you're reviewing the article while there is GA tag on the the page. Unfortunately the article has some problems from technical viewpoint. I asked another Muslim wikipedian to tell us his viewpoint. Can you wait to discuss on it more.--<font face="monospace">[[User:Sa.vakilian|Seyyed]]([[User talk:Sa.vakilian|t]]-[[Special:Contributions/Sa.vakilian|c]])</font> 02:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
531463 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531462 +++$+++ 531462 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.212568680E09 +++$+++ It's not a good article. I put it on hold. I'll change it back.  +++$+++ :It's not a good article. I put it on hold. I'll change it back. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 01:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
531464 +++$+++ Sa.vakilian +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531462 +++$+++ 531463 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.212569460E09 +++$+++ I agree with you. But please remove it from [[WP:GAN]].--<font face=\"monospace\"> +++$+++ ::I agree with you. But please remove it from [[WP:GAN]].--<font face="monospace">[[User:Sa.vakilian|Seyyed]]([[User talk:Sa.vakilian|t]]-[[Special:Contributions/Sa.vakilian|c]])</font> 01:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
531465 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531462 +++$+++ 531464 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.212569820E09 +++$+++ I can't do that because I've taken it to Good Article Reassessment, rather than simply delisting it. I think delisting straight away is too hasty and since another editor thought it passed GA criteria, reassessment is a better option as it encourages more reviews. If consensus is that it's not a Good Article, it will be delisted. Feel free to comment on the reassessment page.  +++$+++ :::I can't do that because I've taken it to Good Article Reassessment, rather than simply delisting it. I think delisting straight away is too hasty and since another editor thought it passed GA criteria, reassessment is a better option as it encourages more reviews. If consensus is that it's not a Good Article, it will be delisted. Feel free to comment on the reassessment page. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 01:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
531466 +++$+++ Sa.vakilian +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531462 +++$+++ 531465 +++$+++ 2008-06-06 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.212744360E09 +++$+++ Please write your idea about alternative lead which I've proposed[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Sources_of_Islamic_law\/GA2#Proposal].--<font face=\"monospace\"> +++$+++ ::::Please write your idea about alternative lead which I've proposed[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sources_of_Islamic_law/GA2#Proposal].--<font face="monospace">[[User:Sa.vakilian|Seyyed]]([[User talk:Sa.vakilian|t]]-[[Special:Contributions/Sa.vakilian|c]])</font> 02:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

269319 +++$+++ SusanLesch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269319 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-30 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.233325620E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, there's a note for you in the GA review for [[Alan Kotok]]. Thanks. - +++$+++ Mattisse, there's a note for you in the GA review for [[Alan Kotok]]. Thanks. -[[User:SusanLesch|SusanLesch]] ([[User talk:SusanLesch|talk]]) 06:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
269320 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269319 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-30 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.233376200E09 +++$+++ Although I am not familiar with the subject matter of [[Alan Kotok]] article, I suspect that you have included mention of the relevant information. The problem is that the material is not rounded out. I have looked for some similar articles so that you could see by example what I mean. The best I could find was the following: [[Stuart Milner-Barry]], [[Ronald Fedkiw]], [[Otto Julius Zobel]]. These articles are not quite on the same subject, but they can give you an idea of what a full fledged GA article should look like.  &mdash; +++$+++ :*Although I am not familiar with the subject matter of [[Alan Kotok]] article, I suspect that you have included mention of the relevant information. The problem is that the material is not rounded out. I have looked for some similar articles so that you could see by example what I mean. The best I could find was the following: [[Stuart Milner-Barry]], [[Ronald Fedkiw]], [[Otto Julius Zobel]]. These articles are not quite on the same subject, but they can give you an idea of what a full fledged GA article should look like.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
269321 +++$+++ SusanLesch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269319 +++$+++ 269319 +++$+++ 2009-01-30 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.233387780E09 +++$+++ OK. Another note for you there. Thanks. - +++$+++ :OK. Another note for you there. Thanks. -[[User:SusanLesch|SusanLesch]] ([[User talk:SusanLesch|talk]]) 23:43, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
269322 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269319 +++$+++ 269321 +++$+++ 2009-01-30 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.233388200E09 +++$+++ Having read the note, all I can do is reiterate that  I am not familiar enough with the subject matter to be more specific, so go ahead and ask for GAR, if that is what you want, as I am unable help you any more. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::Having read the note, all I can do is reiterate that  I am not familiar enough with the subject matter to be more specific, so go ahead and ask for GAR, if that is what you want, as I am unable help you any more. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

7177 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-18 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.305753240E09 +++$+++ Hi, I am glad that is resolved. I am sure that is the correct position and supported from the cites so we can defend that and alterations will require additional reliable externals. Thanks for your patience. Regards.  +++$+++ Hi, I am glad that is resolved. I am sure that is the correct position and supported from the cites so we can defend that and alterations will require additional reliable externals. Thanks for your patience. Regards. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 14:14, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
7178 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7177 +++$+++ 7177 +++$+++ 2011-05-22 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.306090380E09 +++$+++ Please provide this reply at the Talk page of the main article so all interested editors can see. -- +++$+++ :Please provide this reply at the Talk page of the main article so all interested editors can see. --[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast#top|talk]]) 11:53, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

269323 +++$+++ Bilby +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269323 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-30 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.233383220E09 +++$+++ Hi! Thanks again for reviewing the article, and equally thanks for the copyedits. Your suggestions were great, and I think they improved the article a great deal. :) -  +++$+++ Hi! Thanks again for reviewing the article, and equally thanks for the copyedits. Your suggestions were great, and I think they improved the article a great deal. :) - [[User:Bilby|Bilby]] ([[User talk:Bilby|talk]]) 22:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
269324 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269323 +++$+++ 269323 +++$+++ 2009-01-30 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.233383340E09 +++$+++ Thanks! You improved the article too.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks! You improved the article too.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
269325 +++$+++ Bilby +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269323 +++$+++ 269324 +++$+++ 2009-01-30 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.233383880E09 +++$+++ Guess so. :) But I still think the the coolest thing about WP is getting to collaborate on articles, so I really enjoy it when I get to do so - it's much more fun than writing on my own like I normally have to do. And the articles end up much better than anything I could produce. -  +++$+++ ::Guess so. :) But I still think the the coolest thing about WP is getting to collaborate on articles, so I really enjoy it when I get to do so - it's much more fun than writing on my own like I normally have to do. And the articles end up much better than anything I could produce. - [[User:Bilby|Bilby]] ([[User talk:Bilby|talk]]) 22:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
269326 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269323 +++$+++ 269325 +++$+++ 2009-01-30 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.233384000E09 +++$+++ I agree. It's a great feeling!  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I agree. It's a great feeling!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

7182 +++$+++ Short Brigade Harvester Boris +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7182 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-26 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.306474740E09 +++$+++ {{DTTR}}  +++$+++ {{DTTR}} [[User:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|Short Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 22:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
7183 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7182 +++$+++ 7182 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.306474980E09 +++$+++ I hope that the user is more civil in the future. -- +++$+++ :I hope that the user is more civil in the future. --[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast#top|talk]]) 22:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

263341 +++$+++ GWP +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-15 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.145127840E09 +++$+++ If you intend replying to this with a 'witty' riposte, could you attempt better than above.  +++$+++ If you intend replying to this with a 'witty' riposte, could you attempt better than above. [[User:GWP|GWP]] 12:04, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
263342 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263341 +++$+++ 263341 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.145128740E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, I don't think this [[Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks|aggressive response]] is called for. This project is a collaborative effort. I brought your project to the attention of the community via talk pages. This gave other wikipedians the opportunity to assess the appropriateness of your project. Since everyone else who has contributed to the discussions have expressed doubts over the validity of yor project, I took this as consensus, something you seem to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=As_Time_Goes_By&diff=48257603&oldid=48114624 ignore]  +++$+++ :I'm sorry, I don't think this [[Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks|aggressive response]] is called for. This project is a collaborative effort. I brought your project to the attention of the community via talk pages. This gave other wikipedians the opportunity to assess the appropriateness of your project. Since everyone else who has contributed to the discussions have expressed doubts over the validity of yor project, I took this as consensus, something you seem to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=As_Time_Goes_By&diff=48257603&oldid=48114624 ignore] [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 12:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

269329 +++$+++ DavidCane +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269329 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-31 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.233460440E09 +++$+++ Regarding the anti-Semitic aspects of the attacks made against him, the literature does seem to link the anti-German and anti-Semitic movements together to the extent that to some they were interchangeable. There appears to be some ambiguity as to his Jewishness. He was indisputably of Jewish decent, but he married in an Anglican church and when he took the oath of office of the Privy Council he initially tried to do it on the the Bible until the priggish clerk, Almeric FitzRoy, forced him to use a Jewish holy book. His children also seem to have married in Christian ceremonies. Therefore, he may have converted at some time, or he might just have been trying to fit in. I originally left out any direct reference to anti-Semitism, but, if I can find some definite examples of it applying to him, I will add something on the subject. -- +++$+++ Regarding the anti-Semitic aspects of the attacks made against him, the literature does seem to link the anti-German and anti-Semitic movements together to the extent that to some they were interchangeable. There appears to be some ambiguity as to his Jewishness. He was indisputably of Jewish decent, but he married in an Anglican church and when he took the oath of office of the Privy Council he initially tried to do it on the the Bible until the priggish clerk, Almeric FitzRoy, forced him to use a Jewish holy book. His children also seem to have married in Christian ceremonies. Therefore, he may have converted at some time, or he might just have been trying to fit in. I originally left out any direct reference to anti-Semitism, but, if I can find some definite examples of it applying to him, I will add something on the subject. --[[User:DavidCane|DavidCane]] ([[User talk:DavidCane|talk]]) 19:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
269330 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269329 +++$+++ 269329 +++$+++ 2009-01-31 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.233462600E09 +++$+++ As far as \"being Jewish\", I don't think it depends on what Bible a person swears on but on decent, as it is an ethnicity even more than it is a religion.    In the U.S., there was a general prejudice toward Jews but I don't think it was overtly a part of any foreign policy and probably would not be mentioned openly or in publications. In fact, it was only after World War II had ended and the treatment of Jews in Germany became general knowledge, that the issue of Jewishness became one of open discussion in the press. I would not be surprised if the situation was similar in the UK; that is, that it was not a topic of open discussion. In WWI, Jews and Germans could well be combined in people's minds, as WWII and concentration camp, etc. had not yet happened. I think you are correct in not making it an issue in your article (unless, of course, you find evidence) because the German connection was a justification for those looking for a reason to treat Speyer as they did. It is remarkable, however, that Speyer was treated so harshly, a person who had contributed so much to the British culture ans was honored for doing so. However, his business success (in some minds connection to Judaism) perhaps increased the degree of harsh punishment to a seemingly harmless man. To me the story in the way you have presented it eloquently  speaks for itself. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :As far as "being Jewish", I don't think it depends on what Bible a person swears on but on decent, as it is an ethnicity even more than it is a religion.    In the U.S., there was a general prejudice toward Jews but I don't think it was overtly a part of any foreign policy and probably would not be mentioned openly or in publications. In fact, it was only after World War II had ended and the treatment of Jews in Germany became general knowledge, that the issue of Jewishness became one of open discussion in the press. I would not be surprised if the situation was similar in the UK; that is, that it was not a topic of open discussion. In WWI, Jews and Germans could well be combined in people's minds, as WWII and concentration camp, etc. had not yet happened. I think you are correct in not making it an issue in your article (unless, of course, you find evidence) because the German connection was a justification for those looking for a reason to treat Speyer as they did. It is remarkable, however, that Speyer was treated so harshly, a person who had contributed so much to the British culture ans was honored for doing so. However, his business success (in some minds connection to Judaism) perhaps increased the degree of harsh punishment to a seemingly harmless man. To me the story in the way you have presented it eloquently  speaks for itself. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

269331 +++$+++ Truco +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-31 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.233466560E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I addressed your concerns.--'''''<small> +++$+++ Thanks, I addressed your concerns.--'''''<small>[[User:Truco|<font color="navy">TRU</font>]]</small><small>[[User talk:Truco|<font color="black">CO</font>]]</small>''''' 21:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
269332 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269331 +++$+++ 269331 +++$+++ 2009-01-31 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.233466680E09 +++$+++ OK, I'll look. &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, I'll look. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

611272 +++$+++ VWBot +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-23 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.293167460E09 +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes-->  +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes--> [[User:VWBot|VWBot]] ([[User talk:VWBot|talk]]) 21:11, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
611273 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611272 +++$+++ 611272 +++$+++ 2010-12-23 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.293172800E09 +++$+++ The material on that site was actually taken from a public domain site so there is nothing wrong with it.  +++$+++ :The material on that site was actually taken from a public domain site so there is nothing wrong with it. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 22:40, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
611274 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611272 +++$+++ 611272 +++$+++ 2010-12-24 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.293263700E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 23:55, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

7189 +++$+++ MissMJ +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7189 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-05 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.307284200E09 +++$+++ {{GL map reply}}  +++$+++ {{GL map reply}} [[User:MissMJ|MissMJ]] ([[User talk:MissMJ|talk]]) 07:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
7190 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7189 +++$+++ 7189 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.307342340E09 +++$+++ Please post comments on [[Talk:Filipino American#June 2011|the discussion]] previously provided. Dispute of newly added content that isn't inclusive to <b>all<\/b> Asian Americans can be found there, previous consensus, and new consensus can be found there as well. -- +++$+++ :Please post comments on [[Talk:Filipino American#June 2011|the discussion]] previously provided. Dispute of newly added content that isn't inclusive to <b>all</b> Asian Americans can be found there, previous consensus, and new consensus can be found there as well. --[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast#top|talk]]) 23:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

269334 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-01 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.233550680E09 +++$+++ Sorry for being so argumentative! -- +++$+++ Sorry for being so argumentative! --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 20:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
269335 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269334 +++$+++ 269334 +++$+++ 2009-02-01 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.233550800E09 +++$+++ No problem. It is not clear to me what the heading should be! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :No problem. It is not clear to me what the heading should be! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
269336 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269334 +++$+++ 269335 +++$+++ 2009-02-02 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.233595860E09 +++$+++ How about \"Challenges of inter-species medicine\"? Or does that soud too much like [[management speak]]? -- +++$+++ ::How about "Challenges of inter-species medicine"? Or does that soud too much like [[management speak]]? --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 09:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

7191 +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7191 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-11 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.307813700E09 +++$+++ Ref to your recent revert at [[Eight Nation Alliance]], please have a look:[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard#100_years_old_history_book  100 years old history book] <i><b><small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Ref to your recent revert at [[Eight Nation Alliance]], please have a look:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#100_years_old_history_book  100 years old history book] <i><b><small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Arilang1234|<font style="color:white;background:#fe0000;"> Arilang  </font>]]</span></small><font color="blue"> <sup>[[User talk:Arilang1234|''talk'']]</sup></font></b></i> 10:35, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
7192 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7191 +++$+++ 7191 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.307840220E09 +++$+++ The external links to Wikisource that was provided lead to bad page names, or did not exist; therefore, the reference did not exist. Per [[WP:BURDEN]] it is up to the editor who ads the content to added the references, as no references were provided at the time content was removed per policy. -- +++$+++ :The external links to Wikisource that was provided lead to bad page names, or did not exist; therefore, the reference did not exist. Per [[WP:BURDEN]] it is up to the editor who ads the content to added the references, as no references were provided at the time content was removed per policy. --[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast#top|talk]]) 17:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

531481 +++$+++ Clockwork84 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531481 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-20 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.214004000E09 +++$+++ Somno, as you had replied many times on my talk page, could you please assist me with this article [[Maria Houkli]]. I've added the notes and the references and I need you to verify if the article is okay now and if that be the case, remove the tags above. Thank you.  +++$+++ Somno, as you had replied many times on my talk page, could you please assist me with this article [[Maria Houkli]]. I've added the notes and the references and I need you to verify if the article is okay now and if that be the case, remove the tags above. Thank you. [[User:Clockwork84|Clockwork84]] ([[User talk:Clockwork84|talk]]) 16:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
531482 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531481 +++$+++ 531481 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.214321760E09 +++$+++ All sorted on [[Talk:Maria Houkli]] and [[User_talk:Clockwork84]].  +++$+++ :All sorted on [[Talk:Maria Houkli]] and [[User_talk:Clockwork84]]. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

7194 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7194 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.307928900E09 +++$+++ Hi, please note that I have mentioned a tag you placed on [[Jose Peralta]] at [[WP:RFAR]]. See [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case#Statement_by_Jayen466]]. --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ Hi, please note that I have mentioned a tag you placed on [[Jose Peralta]] at [[WP:RFAR]]. See [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Statement_by_Jayen466]]. --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|J]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|N]]</font><font color="#0000FF">[[Special:Contributions/Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 18:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
7195 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7194 +++$+++ 7194 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.307933700E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the notice. I was informed about this article [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject United States#Request for NPOV review|here]] and placed the tag after a POV check. I have only checked the top two, but can check the rest on the list, but am probably going to hold off until the ARBCOM event is finished as not to become further involved. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the notice. I was informed about this article [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject United States#Request for NPOV review|here]] and placed the tag after a POV check. I have only checked the top two, but can check the rest on the list, but am probably going to hold off until the ARBCOM event is finished as not to become further involved. --[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast#top|talk]]) 19:55, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
7196 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7194 +++$+++ 7195 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.307934360E09 +++$+++ The [[Everybody Draw Mohammed Day]] article has long since been neutralised, so I don't think it's worthy of your attention. At the time, the controversy was about featuring a DYK hook for that article on the main page, which some editors (me included) felt was in effect promoting the upcoming event. The reason the editor in question no longer cares about the politicians' articles and is happy for them to be NPOV'ed is, I suspect, that the entire effort was just focused on the elections at the time. (Peralta and Anderson won.) Also see [[Wikipedia:NPOVN#Request_for_NPOV_review]]. Cheers, --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ ::The [[Everybody Draw Mohammed Day]] article has long since been neutralised, so I don't think it's worthy of your attention. At the time, the controversy was about featuring a DYK hook for that article on the main page, which some editors (me included) felt was in effect promoting the upcoming event. The reason the editor in question no longer cares about the politicians' articles and is happy for them to be NPOV'ed is, I suspect, that the entire effort was just focused on the elections at the time. (Peralta and Anderson won.) Also see [[Wikipedia:NPOVN#Request_for_NPOV_review]]. Cheers, --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|J]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|N]]</font><font color="#0000FF">[[Special:Contributions/Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 20:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
7197 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7194 +++$+++ 7196 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.307934660E09 +++$+++ [[Reliability of Wikipedia#Liberal bias|There]] was written in an article that Wikipedia is often used as a form of attack against political candidates. It would be unfortunate if this is yet another case. -- +++$+++ :::[[Reliability of Wikipedia#Liberal bias|There]] was written in an article that Wikipedia is often used as a form of attack against political candidates. It would be unfortunate if this is yet another case. --[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast#top|talk]]) 20:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
7198 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7194 +++$+++ 7197 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.307935860E09 +++$+++ I posted voluminous evidence at RfAR about Cirt's actions prior to those two past elections, as well as with regard to the current [[Santorum (neologism)]] dispute. It's in a collapsed box, as it's rather a lot. If you look at that material, I think you'll find that Cirt's actions are indistinguishable from those of an editor out to use Wikipedia as a campaign tool in favour or disfavour of specific candidates, in time for upcoming elections. It is the most egregious such case I have ever seen on Wikipedia. --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ ::::I posted voluminous evidence at RfAR about Cirt's actions prior to those two past elections, as well as with regard to the current [[Santorum (neologism)]] dispute. It's in a collapsed box, as it's rather a lot. If you look at that material, I think you'll find that Cirt's actions are indistinguishable from those of an editor out to use Wikipedia as a campaign tool in favour or disfavour of specific candidates, in time for upcoming elections. It is the most egregious such case I have ever seen on Wikipedia. --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|J]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|N]]</font><font color="#0000FF">[[Special:Contributions/Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 20:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
7199 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7194 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.307936880E09 +++$+++ When involved or politically invested in a candidate or race, I find it best, for [[WP:COI]] issues to avoid editing article spaces during that period related to that aforementioned. One can always suggest edits in the talk page, during that period, but anything else IMHO brings up COI and NPOV issues. -- +++$+++ ::::::When involved or politically invested in a candidate or race, I find it best, for [[WP:COI]] issues to avoid editing article spaces during that period related to that aforementioned. One can always suggest edits in the talk page, during that period, but anything else IMHO brings up COI and NPOV issues. --[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast#top|talk]]) 20:48, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
7200 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7194 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.307937420E09 +++$+++ Perhaps my practice should be written up as an essay, within the COI article space, or elsewhere? -- +++$+++ ::::::Perhaps my practice should be written up as an essay, within the COI article space, or elsewhere? --[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast#top|talk]]) 20:57, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
7201 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7194 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.308016320E09 +++$+++ It's difficult, because neither side should have a monopoly, and investment is a flexible concept. Many editors have strong views; some are able to edit neutrally, others aren't. In general, of course, what you say is sound; if everyone behaved that way, we wouldn't have problems. Like with BLPs generally, the problems tend to be more pronounced with minor figures: it's much easier to \"spin\" the article on a candidate in a minor, local election, which few Wikipedians know or care about, than it is to \"own\" the article on a major figure. However, local people googling their candidates will still find our page on the candidate, if we have one, come top of their Google results. Given the number of minor elections going on at any one time, this is difficult to guard against. It would need a neutrality project that keeps track of any upcoming minor elections, and a group of editors committed to monitoring articles on candidates for neutrality. I don't know if that's feasible, but it might be worthwhile. --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ :::::::It's difficult, because neither side should have a monopoly, and investment is a flexible concept. Many editors have strong views; some are able to edit neutrally, others aren't. In general, of course, what you say is sound; if everyone behaved that way, we wouldn't have problems. Like with BLPs generally, the problems tend to be more pronounced with minor figures: it's much easier to "spin" the article on a candidate in a minor, local election, which few Wikipedians know or care about, than it is to "own" the article on a major figure. However, local people googling their candidates will still find our page on the candidate, if we have one, come top of their Google results. Given the number of minor elections going on at any one time, this is difficult to guard against. It would need a neutrality project that keeps track of any upcoming minor elections, and a group of editors committed to monitoring articles on candidates for neutrality. I don't know if that's feasible, but it might be worthwhile. --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|J]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|N]]</font><font color="#0000FF">[[Special:Contributions/Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 18:52, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
7202 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7194 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-14 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.308048900E09 +++$+++ Or perhaps you may want to propose what you wrote above in the conversation I linked above. -- +++$+++ ::::::::Or perhaps you may want to propose what you wrote above in the conversation I linked above. --[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast#top|talk]]) 03:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

531483 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-29 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.214764080E09 +++$+++ Wow, thats the biggest and best single edit new article I've seen for a while.  Good work and congratulations.   +++$+++ Wow, thats the biggest and best single edit new article I've seen for a while.  Good work and congratulations.  [[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 11:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
531484 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531483 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.214767440E09 +++$+++ In my case the biggest ever  i have seen that has clearly pass on all V N RS - well done  +++$+++ ::In my case the biggest ever  i have seen that has clearly pass on all V N RS - well done [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
531485 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531483 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.214768700E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Lot of work went into that one. :)  +++$+++ :::Thanks! Lot of work went into that one. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 12:45, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
531486 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531483 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.214769060E09 +++$+++ You might want to re-format the external links to the PR web pages - possibly the bolding dosnt work well :(  +++$+++ ::::You might want to re-format the external links to the PR web pages - possibly the bolding dosnt work well :( [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
531487 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531483 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.214774400E09 +++$+++ Moondynes fixed it  +++$+++ :::::Moondynes fixed it [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 14:20, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

607585 +++$+++ Exploding Boy +++$+++ Exploding Boy +++$+++ 607585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-02 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.149241200E09 +++$+++ IE6.   +++$+++ IE6.  [[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]] 02:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
607586 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ Exploding Boy +++$+++ 607585 +++$+++ 607585 +++$+++ 2006-06-02 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.149241320E09 +++$+++ OK, lets get a screenshot then. What is your keyboard layout, is it a qwerty keyboard?  +++$+++ :OK, lets get a screenshot then. What is your keyboard layout, is it a qwerty keyboard? [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 02:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
607587 +++$+++ nathanrdotcom +++$+++ Exploding Boy +++$+++ 607585 +++$+++ 607585 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.149361560E09 +++$+++ Making comments here and there that you don't like the signature yet refuse to explain exactly ''how'' isn't a discussion. A discussion works two ways, not just one. \u2014 [[User:nathanrdotcom|<font color=\"navy\">'''Natha'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Making comments here and there that you don't like the signature yet refuse to explain exactly ''how'' isn't a discussion. A discussion works two ways, not just one. — [[User:nathanrdotcom|<font color="navy">'''Natha'''</font>]][[User:ILovePlankton/My loyalties to my friends|<font color="#336666">'''n'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:nathanrdotcom|talk]])</sup> 12:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
607588 +++$+++  +++$+++ Exploding Boy +++$+++ 607585 +++$+++ 607585 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ If you need it to be official, I'm involving Prodego because he's a good mediator. ~~ 2:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :If you need it to be official, I'm involving Prodego because he's a good mediator. ~~ 2:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

269342 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269342 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-03 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.233697380E09 +++$+++ Best wishes, -- +++$+++ Best wishes, --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 13:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
269343 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269342 +++$+++ 269342 +++$+++ 2009-02-03 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.233701520E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for your advice. I will read through it carefully and seek to profit from it. I very much appreciate the fact that you took the time of yourself to give to me. Please, please do not let the RFC depress you. It is very one sided and a distorted version of events. Please judge for yourself, based my behavior that you see and not what others say. And I urge you to feel free to let me know if you think I am behaving badly or if you have a suggestion as to how I could have improved the way I handled a situation. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you very much for your advice. I will read through it carefully and seek to profit from it. I very much appreciate the fact that you took the time of yourself to give to me. Please, please do not let the RFC depress you. It is very one sided and a distorted version of events. Please judge for yourself, based my behavior that you see and not what others say. And I urge you to feel free to let me know if you think I am behaving badly or if you have a suggestion as to how I could have improved the way I handled a situation. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

531488 +++$+++ Sfan00 IMG +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-29 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.214768340E09 +++$+++ Redundant - <nowiki>{{geofacti}}<\/nowiki> should be used inline in preference :)  +++$+++ Redundant - <nowiki>{{geofacti}}</nowiki> should be used inline in preference :) [[User:Sfan00 IMG|Sfan00 IMG]] ([[User talk:Sfan00 IMG|talk]]) 12:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
531489 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531488 +++$+++ 531488 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.214773440E09 +++$+++ Cool, that makes more sense to me than a huge template. :)  +++$+++ :Cool, that makes more sense to me than a huge template. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 14:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
531490 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531488 +++$+++ 531488 +++$+++ 2008-06-30 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.214819160E09 +++$+++ Me too, although there's more stuff in Factiva to extract later. That should be enough to save it from AFD.  +++$+++ :Me too, although there's more stuff in Factiva to extract later. That should be enough to save it from AFD. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
531491 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531488 +++$+++ 531488 +++$+++ 2008-06-30 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.214819400E09 +++$+++ Cheers and thanks - im henrietta exploiting to the fullest from my end  +++$+++ :Cheers and thanks - im henrietta exploiting to the fullest from my end [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 02:50, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

269346 +++$+++ DiverseMentality +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-04 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.233814320E09 +++$+++ Just thought I'd point out that you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Alicia_Keys&diff=268562323&oldid=268545305 forget] to update the assessment of articles you pass as GA.  +++$+++ Just thought I'd point out that you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alicia_Keys&diff=268562323&oldid=268545305 forget] to update the assessment of articles you pass as GA. [[User:DiverseMentality|<font color="D24A4A">'''Diverse'''</font>]][[User talk:DiverseMentality|<font color="9F1616">'''Mentality'''</font>]] 22:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
269347 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269346 +++$+++ 269346 +++$+++ 2009-02-04 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.233814740E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I am operating on only  a few cylinders today! I fixed it. Thanks for reminding me.  &mdash; +++$+++ *Thank you. I am operating on only  a few cylinders today! I fixed it. Thanks for reminding me.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

7204 +++$+++ Cla68 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7204 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-14 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.308060480E09 +++$+++ I have responded to your review and suggestions on the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Vermouth\/GA1#GA_Review review page].  +++$+++ I have responded to your review and suggestions on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vermouth/GA1#GA_Review review page]. [[User:Cla68|Cla68]] ([[User talk:Cla68|talk]]) 07:08, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
7205 +++$+++ Cla68 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7204 +++$+++ 7204 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.308142260E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AVermouth%2FGA1&action=historysubmit&diff=434361564&oldid=434316223 Answered].  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AVermouth%2FGA1&action=historysubmit&diff=434361564&oldid=434316223 Answered]. [[User:Cla68|Cla68]] ([[User talk:Cla68|talk]]) 05:51, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
7206 +++$+++ Cla68 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7204 +++$+++ 7205 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 09:24:00 +++$+++ 1.308414240E09 +++$+++ I don't agree with you about adding more citations at the end of sentences that are within cited paragraphs.  So, I won't be following your suggestion, even if that means that the article fails GA nomination.  Thank you for taking the time to review and for your other helpful inputs and suggestions for the article.  +++$+++ ::I don't agree with you about adding more citations at the end of sentences that are within cited paragraphs.  So, I won't be following your suggestion, even if that means that the article fails GA nomination.  Thank you for taking the time to review and for your other helpful inputs and suggestions for the article. [[User:Cla68|Cla68]] ([[User talk:Cla68|talk]]) 09:24, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

531493 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-01 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.214924280E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=222820606&oldid=222816701 LOL!].  Draft beer?   +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=222820606&oldid=222816701 LOL!].  Draft beer?  [[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 07:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
531494 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531493 +++$+++ 531493 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.214924640E09 +++$+++ Have to focus on the most important things in such a crisis!  +++$+++ :Have to focus on the most important things in such a crisis! [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

269350 +++$+++ Giano II +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-03 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.233682080E09 +++$+++ I now consider your behaviour to be so intollerable that I have commented here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/Mattisse_3#Outside_view_by_Giano].  +++$+++ I now consider your behaviour to be so intollerable that I have commented here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Mattisse_3#Outside_view_by_Giano]. [[User:Giano II|Giano]] ([[User talk:Giano II|talk]]) 09:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
269351 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269350 +++$+++ 269350 +++$+++ 2009-02-03 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.233692520E09 +++$+++ Thanks Giano, your input is always welcome and I am honored that you took the time.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks Giano, your input is always welcome and I am honored that you took the time.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
269352 +++$+++ Giano II +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269350 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-03 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.233723300E09 +++$+++ It's no honour. Please just don't interfere with you fatuous comments in my work, and try to follow some of the wise advice your friends are giving you. I'm sure we can co-exist here quite well, it's not as though our orbits are likely to collide - is it?  +++$+++ :::It's no honour. Please just don't interfere with you fatuous comments in my work, and try to follow some of the wise advice your friends are giving you. I'm sure we can co-exist here quite well, it's not as though our orbits are likely to collide - is it? [[User:Giano II|Giano]] ([[User talk:Giano II|talk]]) 20:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
269353 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269350 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-03 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.233723720E09 +++$+++ Thank you for taking the time to contact me. I was honored to help improve your article and I thank you for allowing me to do so.    &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Thank you for taking the time to contact me. I was honored to help improve your article and I thank you for allowing me to do so.    &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

531495 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-03 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.215090060E09 +++$+++ well one wonders indeed -  +++$+++ well one wonders indeed - [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 06:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
531496 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531495 +++$+++ 531495 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.215090780E09 +++$+++ Didn't mean to suggest a conspiracy, just seemed like a strange thing to omit. :)  +++$+++ :Didn't mean to suggest a conspiracy, just seemed like a strange thing to omit. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 06:13, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
531497 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531495 +++$+++ 531495 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 06:16:00 +++$+++ 1.215090960E09 +++$+++ Nah hesp is quite right there is a potential BLP issue if there is inadequate refs available  +++$+++ :Nah hesp is quite right there is a potential BLP issue if there is inadequate refs available [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 06:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
531498 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531495 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.215091200E09 +++$+++ Heheh - well im not currently an enrolled student anywhere either so access to it is zilch  +++$+++ :::Heheh - well im not currently an enrolled student anywhere either so access to it is zilch [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 06:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
531499 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531495 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 06:23:00 +++$+++ 1.215091380E09 +++$+++ It's the only reason I'm still a student! OK, slight exaggeration, but I would be lost without access to it.  +++$+++ ::::It's the only reason I'm still a student! OK, slight exaggeration, but I would be lost without access to it. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 06:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
531500 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531495 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.215091620E09 +++$+++ Have fun with the art I think I used to know the guy mentioned in the sunday times summary - ill be interested to see how you go with the art - interesting to think it got such wide coverage - a few other consulates in west perth about 15 or 20 years ago used to always have shady looking unmarked vehicles always parked outside them all the time  +++$+++ :::::Have fun with the art I think I used to know the guy mentioned in the sunday times summary - ill be interested to see how you go with the art - interesting to think it got such wide coverage - a few other consulates in west perth about 15 or 20 years ago used to always have shady looking unmarked vehicles always parked outside them all the time [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 06:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

269354 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-05 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.233854280E09 +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse. I'm about to fail [[Valley of Mexico]] as GA, since there are plenty of issues that are not individually huge but have not been addressed in the last 2 weeks. However I think a couple of sections are too long and detailed, poorly structured, and less concise than they need to be. I've left some hints on how to rewrite these, and would be grateful if you could add any comments or tips that would help the editors - or  present a different point of view, if you think my critique is questionable. The sections that give most difficulty are described at [[Talk:Valley_of_Mexico\/GA1#Overall_impression]]. -- +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse. I'm about to fail [[Valley of Mexico]] as GA, since there are plenty of issues that are not individually huge but have not been addressed in the last 2 weeks. However I think a couple of sections are too long and detailed, poorly structured, and less concise than they need to be. I've left some hints on how to rewrite these, and would be grateful if you could add any comments or tips that would help the editors - or  present a different point of view, if you think my critique is questionable. The sections that give most difficulty are described at [[Talk:Valley_of_Mexico/GA1#Overall_impression]]. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 09:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
269355 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269354 +++$+++ 269354 +++$+++ 2009-02-06 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.233940680E09 +++$+++ [[Murphy's Law]] strikes again - Thelmadatter did a lot to deal with one of the issues last night. Maybe he was unavailable until very recently - it's a fairly common consequence of the GA queue's being so long. -- +++$+++ :[[Murphy's Law]] strikes again - Thelmadatter did a lot to deal with one of the issues last night. Maybe he was unavailable until very recently - it's a fairly common consequence of the GA queue's being so long. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 09:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

481799 +++$+++ Minun +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481799 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-16 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.153087620E09 +++$+++ Well done for managing to become an admin, I wish you good luck with your new administrator priviledges, cheers [[User:Minun\/PCP\/Entrance|<font color=\"red\">'''''M'''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ Well done for managing to become an admin, I wish you good luck with your new administrator priviledges, cheers [[User:Minun/PCP/Entrance|<font color="red">'''''M'''''</font>]][[User:Minun|<font color="#ffcc00;">''' ''inun'' '''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Minun|<font color="#ffcc00;">''' ''(Spiderman)'' '''</font>]]</sup> 15:07, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
481800 +++$+++ Jusjih +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481799 +++$+++ 481799 +++$+++ 2006-07-17 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.153124760E09 +++$+++ Best wish for your adminship.-- +++$+++ :Best wish for your adminship.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 01:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
481801 +++$+++ I@n +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481799 +++$+++ 481799 +++$+++ 2006-07-17 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.153130940E09 +++$+++ Congratulations - you deserve it. --  +++$+++ :Congratulations - you deserve it. -- [[User:I@n|I@n]] &equiv; [[User_talk:I@n|talk]] 03:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

269356 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-06 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.233921900E09 +++$+++ '''Thank you Mattisse''' for the barn star of peace. I hope that it will act as a symbolic \u201cnew beginning\u201d to a more harmonious editing relationship between us. My wish is for us to operate with a clean slate towards one another and to leave the past behind. You have many valuable attributes to offer Wikipedia, and it is my desire for us both to no longer be distracted from our main mission ... which is the production of a great encyclopedic resource. In appreciation, &nbsp;&nbsp; +++$+++ '''Thank you Mattisse''' for the barn star of peace. I hope that it will act as a symbolic “new beginning” to a more harmonious editing relationship between us. My wish is for us to operate with a clean slate towards one another and to leave the past behind. You have many valuable attributes to offer Wikipedia, and it is my desire for us both to no longer be distracted from our main mission ... which is the production of a great encyclopedic resource. In appreciation, &nbsp;&nbsp;[[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]])RT 04:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
269357 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269356 +++$+++ 269356 +++$+++ 2009-02-06 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.233922680E09 +++$+++ I want that too. I value you because you are honest. Besides, I really do like you! &mdash; +++$+++ :I want that too. I value you because you are honest. Besides, I really do like you! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

269358 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-03 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.233720540E09 +++$+++ I responded to your GA review.  +++$+++ I responded to your GA review. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 20:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
269359 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269358 +++$+++ 269358 +++$+++ 2009-02-03 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.233720720E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks. I will take a look. &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, thanks. I will take a look. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
269360 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269358 +++$+++ 269359 +++$+++ 2009-02-04 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.233795060E09 +++$+++ I have some further responses. I have partially addressed your concerns, but I couldn't find anything in policy which would require citing or at least listing a print version of ''Moby-Dick'' in addition to the wikisource one. Given that the book was public domain long before the Internet era (making for ''many'' print editions, so I don't see the usefulness of a page number citation) and thus ''many'' online editions exist, perhaps we should get some opinions on this at one of the relevant policy talk pages. As for the page numbers from the NRHP application, I will be putting them in later.  +++$+++ ::I have some further responses. I have partially addressed your concerns, but I couldn't find anything in policy which would require citing or at least listing a print version of ''Moby-Dick'' in addition to the wikisource one. Given that the book was public domain long before the Internet era (making for ''many'' print editions, so I don't see the usefulness of a page number citation) and thus ''many'' online editions exist, perhaps we should get some opinions on this at one of the relevant policy talk pages. As for the page numbers from the NRHP application, I will be putting them in later. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 16:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
269361 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269358 +++$+++ 269360 +++$+++ 2009-02-04 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.233795600E09 +++$+++ Ok, I will look later. (I am a little under the weather today.) The reason for the citing of Moby Dick is so the reader can go to that page an verify that indeed that is an exact quote from Moby Dick. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Ok, I will look later. (I am a little under the weather today.) The reason for the citing of Moby Dick is so the reader can go to that page an verify that indeed that is an exact quote from Moby Dick. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
269362 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269358 +++$+++ 269361 +++$+++ 2009-02-05 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.233883440E09 +++$+++ I have now cited the sections of Moby-Dick to the Plain Label Books edition at Google, which gives it an ISBN and page numbers. So, all your issues have been addressed. (This might still be worth a discussion at WT:CITE, though).  +++$+++ ::::I have now cited the sections of Moby-Dick to the Plain Label Books edition at Google, which gives it an ISBN and page numbers. So, all your issues have been addressed. (This might still be worth a discussion at WT:CITE, though). [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 17:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
269363 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269358 +++$+++ 269362 +++$+++ 2009-02-06 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.233971160E09 +++$+++ OK. I did the bibliography now.  +++$+++ :::::OK. I did the bibliography now. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 17:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
269364 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269358 +++$+++ 269363 +++$+++ 2009-02-06 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.233971460E09 +++$+++ Great! I will take a look shortly.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::Great! I will take a look shortly.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
269365 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269358 +++$+++ 269364 +++$+++ 2009-02-06 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.233984600E09 +++$+++ Thank you!  +++$+++ :::::::Thank you! [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 21:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
269366 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269358 +++$+++ 269365 +++$+++ 2009-02-06 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.233984780E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. A very nice, clearly written article. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::You are welcome. A very nice, clearly written article. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

7215 +++$+++ Parsecboy +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-06 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312644000E09 +++$+++ Hello, RightCowLeftCoast. The article meets B5 with the infobox - the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Assessment\/B-Class|B-class criteria]] requires \"an infobox, images, or diagrams\" for B5. Please reconsider your assessment of the article. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hello, RightCowLeftCoast. The article meets B5 with the infobox - the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/B-Class|B-class criteria]] requires "an infobox, images, or diagrams" for B5. Please reconsider your assessment of the article. Thanks. [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] ([[User talk:Parsecboy|talk]]) 08:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
7216 +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ RightCowLeftCoast +++$+++ 7215 +++$+++ 7215 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.312669380E09 +++$+++ I was specifically looking for images or diagrams. If you feel strongly about this, you can reassess, be [[WP:BOLD|bold]], be free, I won't take it [[WP:AGF|negatively]]. -- +++$+++ :I was specifically looking for images or diagrams. If you feel strongly about this, you can reassess, be [[WP:BOLD|bold]], be free, I won't take it [[WP:AGF|negatively]]. --[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast#top|talk]]) 15:23, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

531505 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531505 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-08 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.215519120E09 +++$+++ Looks fine - i tend to balk at blocks of text like that and i like headings for toc purposes but others tend to try to reduce em - so there you have it - what has constituted events such as this in oz history would have made me edit the earlier version of the lead para - but it reads fine now - well done! also when you do your multiple messages - moondyne is well worth cc'ing to as well - he has a very good eye for that sort of article - cheers  +++$+++ Looks fine - i tend to balk at blocks of text like that and i like headings for toc purposes but others tend to try to reduce em - so there you have it - what has constituted events such as this in oz history would have made me edit the earlier version of the lead para - but it reads fine now - well done! also when you do your multiple messages - moondyne is well worth cc'ing to as well - he has a very good eye for that sort of article - cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 05:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
531506 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531505 +++$+++ 531505 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.215526320E09 +++$+++ I like headings too, but I didn't bother as I thought it was going to be a few paragraphs, and then I was in a hurry so I just posted it. I'm going to try reorganising it how Hesperian suggested, or at least fix up the lead and put in a couple of headings. Didn't think of Moondyne in this instance, just those who'd commented on the talk page (another side effect of hurrying!). Thanks,  +++$+++ :I like headings too, but I didn't bother as I thought it was going to be a few paragraphs, and then I was in a hurry so I just posted it. I'm going to try reorganising it how Hesperian suggested, or at least fix up the lead and put in a couple of headings. Didn't think of Moondyne in this instance, just those who'd commented on the talk page (another side effect of hurrying!). Thanks, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 07:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

525491 +++$+++ Bibliomaniac15 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-01 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.191305400E09 +++$+++ You started the article Digoxin antitoxin, which I moved to a more appropriate name. I added some information to it, and I was wondering if you could check it. Thanks! ''''' +++$+++ You started the article Digoxin antitoxin, which I moved to a more appropriate name. I added some information to it, and I was wondering if you could check it. Thanks! '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="black">bibliomaniac</font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="red">1</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bibliomaniac15|<font color="blue">5</font>]]''''' 23:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
525492 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525491 +++$+++ 525491 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.191658020E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your expansion. It looks good, and I've added a journal ref, but it's now expanded to a little beyond my level of expertise. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for your expansion. It looks good, and I've added a journal ref, but it's now expanded to a little beyond my level of expertise. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

7221 +++$+++ DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-11 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.229016900E09 +++$+++ (re [[Spooks]]) - it's a new development apparently! Hope you don't mind that I have stuck it back in, as the whole line is fact-tagged anyway so it may as well just stand in line for verification. Cheers  +++$+++ (re [[Spooks]]) - it's a new development apparently! Hope you don't mind that I have stuck it back in, as the whole line is fact-tagged anyway so it may as well just stand in line for verification. Cheers [[User:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered]] ([[User talk:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|talk]]) 09:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
7222 +++$+++ DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7221 +++$+++ 7221 +++$+++ 2008-12-11 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.229025360E09 +++$+++ Yup all sounds good to me thanks, including the loss of \"particularly\"! And I am ''very'' envious of your having seen the Bond exhibition ... Best wishes  +++$+++ :Yup all sounds good to me thanks, including the loss of "particularly"! And I am ''very'' envious of your having seen the Bond exhibition ... Best wishes [[User:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered]] ([[User talk:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|talk]]) 11:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

7223 +++$+++ Grk1011 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-06 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.241648820E09 +++$+++ I see your name a lot when editing the pages for series and shows so I figured you might be able to answer my question. Is there a correct way to do an episode summary? I just started doing a few this week and I figured I would just watch the show and then write about what happened. I wasn't sure if this could be considered original research or not (I figured no since the show would be the source), but I thought I would ask and see if there is a preferred way. Also any guidelines for length and can they be spoilers for the episode? A lot of the stubby descriptions are very vague and don't actually say what happens, rather they hint at things.  +++$+++ I see your name a lot when editing the pages for series and shows so I figured you might be able to answer my question. Is there a correct way to do an episode summary? I just started doing a few this week and I figured I would just watch the show and then write about what happened. I wasn't sure if this could be considered original research or not (I figured no since the show would be the source), but I thought I would ask and see if there is a preferred way. Also any guidelines for length and can they be spoilers for the episode? A lot of the stubby descriptions are very vague and don't actually say what happens, rather they hint at things. [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 15:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
7224 +++$+++ Grk1011 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7223 +++$+++ 7223 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.241653800E09 +++$+++ In my defense, I only wrote the one, long summary for In Plain Sight, I don't know who wrote the others. I was using the summary for [[Law_%26_Order:_Criminal_Intent_(season_8)#Episodes|Episode 1 of Criminal Intent]] that I saw the other day as a guide since the user who created the whole season page wrote it and I figured that that must be the way it is done (I wrote the ep 3 recap).  +++$+++ :In my defense, I only wrote the one, long summary for In Plain Sight, I don't know who wrote the others. I was using the summary for [[Law_%26_Order:_Criminal_Intent_(season_8)#Episodes|Episode 1 of Criminal Intent]] that I saw the other day as a guide since the user who created the whole season page wrote it and I figured that that must be the way it is done (I wrote the ep 3 recap). [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 16:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
7225 +++$+++ Grk1011 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7223 +++$+++ 7224 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.241655780E09 +++$+++ Ok great. I'm definitely a fan of at least 3 sentences and some actual details about what happened. I am behind in The Mentalist and tried to look at the summaries to see where I was and had a hard time trying to figure out if I had seen them or not. They were very vague and hinted at things without saying what happened so it was very difficult. So since you approve of my edited summary, I'll try to make them more like it from now on.  +++$+++ ::Ok great. I'm definitely a fan of at least 3 sentences and some actual details about what happened. I am behind in The Mentalist and tried to look at the summaries to see where I was and had a hard time trying to figure out if I had seen them or not. They were very vague and hinted at things without saying what happened so it was very difficult. So since you approve of my edited summary, I'll try to make them more like it from now on. [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 17:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

269368 +++$+++ Burningclean +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-07 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.233999000E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the review. And your one complaint is taken care of. :D Woo! I just wrote the article for the most hated album in metal! <font color=\"steelblue\"> +++$+++ Thank you for the review. And your one complaint is taken care of. :D Woo! I just wrote the article for the most hated album in metal! <font color="steelblue">[[User:Burningclean|'''''Burningclean''''']]</font>&nbsp;<sub><font color="red">[[User talk:Burningclean|[speak]]]</font></sub> 01:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
269369 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269368 +++$+++ 269368 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.233999120E09 +++$+++ Really! The most hated, why?  &mdash; +++$+++ :Really! The most hated, why?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
269370 +++$+++ Burningclean +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269368 +++$+++ 269369 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.234006380E09 +++$+++ Ah, just metal fan-snob rubbish. They don't like the fact that Metallica progresses and that they don't keep making the same album over and over. <font color=\"steelblue\"> +++$+++ ::Ah, just metal fan-snob rubbish. They don't like the fact that Metallica progresses and that they don't keep making the same album over and over. <font color="steelblue">[[User:Burningclean|'''''Burningclean''''']]</font>&nbsp;<sub><font color="red">[[User talk:Burningclean|[speak]]]</font></sub> 03:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

609331 +++$+++ H.J. Bellamy +++$+++ The Haunted Angel +++$+++ 609331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-19 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164000840E09 +++$+++ Yes President Bush is a republican. Also what does anon Christian mean  +++$+++ Yes President Bush is a republican. Also what does anon Christian mean [[User:H.J. Bellamy|H.J. Bellamy]] 21:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
609332 +++$+++ The Haunted Angel +++$+++ The Haunted Angel +++$+++ 609331 +++$+++ 609331 +++$+++ 2006-11-19 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.164003000E09 +++$+++ When I said \"Anon Christian\" I was reffereing to 68.52.232.43, the IP vandal who is spouting Christian crap on ''my'' talk page. '''<font color=\"Indigo\"> +++$+++ :When I said "Anon Christian" I was reffereing to 68.52.232.43, the IP vandal who is spouting Christian crap on ''my'' talk page. '''<font color="Indigo">[[User:The Haunted Angel|The Haunted Angel]]</font>''' <sup>([[User talk:The Haunted Angel|The Forest Whispers My Name]])</sup> 22:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

531514 +++$+++ Epicadam +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531514 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-22 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.216782420E09 +++$+++ {{User:Epicadam\/ganremind|Sources of Islamic law}} Best,  +++$+++ {{User:Epicadam/ganremind|Sources of Islamic law}} Best, [[User:Epicadam|epicAdam]] ([[User talk:Epicadam|talk]]) 20:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
531515 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531514 +++$+++ 531514 +++$+++ 2008-07-23 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.216798500E09 +++$+++ Yes, yes I know. I'm getting to it! :) It's a long article that needs a lot of time to review, and I'm pretty sure it will pass GA so it will be worth it in the end.  +++$+++ :Yes, yes I know. I'm getting to it! :) It's a long article that needs a lot of time to review, and I'm pretty sure it will pass GA so it will be worth it in the end. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 00:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

44895 +++$+++ Novice7 +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ 44895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-06 07:22:00 +++$+++ 1.307370120E09 +++$+++ Hi Prosperosity. Do you happen to know any good Japanese to English online translators? Google and Babelfish are really bad. I want to translate parts of [http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20040408205746\/http:\/\/www.sonymusic.co.jp\/Music\/International\/Special\/JessicaSimpson\/Interview\/index.html this] interview to expand an article. <font face=\"Arial\" color=\"CornflowerBlue\"> +++$+++ Hi Prosperosity. Do you happen to know any good Japanese to English online translators? Google and Babelfish are really bad. I want to translate parts of [http://web.archive.org/web/20040408205746/http://www.sonymusic.co.jp/Music/International/Special/JessicaSimpson/Interview/index.html this] interview to expand an article. <font face="Arial" color="CornflowerBlue">[[User:Novice7|'''Novice7''']]</font> (<font face="Arial" color="DodgerBlue">[[User talk:Novice7|'''talk''']]</font>) 07:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
44896 +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ 44895 +++$+++ 44895 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.307434320E09 +++$+++ Due to the lack of mapping of a lot of concepts in English\/Japanese, plus the amount of unstated subjects in Japanese, I don't think good online translators will exist for another 15+, maybe 20+ years. What were you wanting to know from the interview? In all honestly, it's probably a translation of an English interview already out there. -- +++$+++ :Due to the lack of mapping of a lot of concepts in English/Japanese, plus the amount of unstated subjects in Japanese, I don't think good online translators will exist for another 15+, maybe 20+ years. What were you wanting to know from the interview? In all honestly, it's probably a translation of an English interview already out there. --[[User:Prosperosity|Prosperosity]] ([[User talk:Prosperosity#top|talk]]) 01:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
44897 +++$+++ Novice7 +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ 44895 +++$+++ 44896 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.307452740E09 +++$+++ Wow, that long?? I wanted to get some of the quotes from the interview and yes, it is a translation of an English interview (from 2001). I can't find the original interview and the link to the video is broken too... <font face=\"Arial\" color=\"CornflowerBlue\"> +++$+++ ::Wow, that long?? I wanted to get some of the quotes from the interview and yes, it is a translation of an English interview (from 2001). I can't find the original interview and the link to the video is broken too... <font face="Arial" color="CornflowerBlue">[[User:Novice7|'''Novice7''']]</font> (<font face="Arial" color="DodgerBlue">[[User talk:Novice7|'''talk''']]</font>) 06:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
44898 +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ 44895 +++$+++ 44897 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.307460060E09 +++$+++ Okay, well look at it in Google Translate, find the parts that you think will be good for the article, and I'll have a look and translate closer to what it actually says. It's still probably easier to find the original interview, as you'll get some issues when you translate back and forth. A sneaky way to do it might be to find the interview at like, a fan forum or something, and then cite the Japanese version, as it's from an official source. -- +++$+++ :::Okay, well look at it in Google Translate, find the parts that you think will be good for the article, and I'll have a look and translate closer to what it actually says. It's still probably easier to find the original interview, as you'll get some issues when you translate back and forth. A sneaky way to do it might be to find the interview at like, a fan forum or something, and then cite the Japanese version, as it's from an official source. --[[User:Prosperosity|Prosperosity]] ([[User talk:Prosperosity#top|talk]]) 08:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
44899 +++$+++ Novice7 +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ 44895 +++$+++ 44898 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.307466300E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I'll take a print of the translated version and select the ones which are good. I searched on many websites, but in vain. <font face=\"Arial\" color=\"CornflowerBlue\"> +++$+++ ::::Thank you! I'll take a print of the translated version and select the ones which are good. I searched on many websites, but in vain. <font face="Arial" color="CornflowerBlue">[[User:Novice7|'''Novice7''']]</font> (<font face="Arial" color="DodgerBlue">[[User talk:Novice7|'''talk''']]</font>) 10:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

531516 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-27 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.217170980E09 +++$+++ As I dont have access to factiva i was wondering... if I could ask for some help for a possible set of refs against an article that i had to abandon some six months ago ?  +++$+++ As I dont have access to factiva i was wondering... if I could ask for some help for a possible set of refs against an article that i had to abandon some six months ago ? [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 08:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
531517 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.217171100E09 +++$+++ Yep, no worries. What's the article?  +++$+++ :Yep, no worries. What's the article? [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
531518 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.217171400E09 +++$+++ Its up to you - she used to use Reid LIbrary when she was in Perth many moons ago - the article is http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Anna_Livia_Julian_Brawn problem was i could find few reasonable refs when i was in sydney watching over my war of warcraft sons' allnighters last january - just kept hitting dead ends - and havent been back to the article since - it would be great to move it beyond the rather skeletal stage - but hey no obligation - it might be an odd subject - but she was a friend a very long time ago  +++$+++ :Its up to you - she used to use Reid LIbrary when she was in Perth many moons ago - the article is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Livia_Julian_Brawn problem was i could find few reasonable refs when i was in sydney watching over my war of warcraft sons' allnighters last january - just kept hitting dead ends - and havent been back to the article since - it would be great to move it beyond the rather skeletal stage - but hey no obligation - it might be an odd subject - but she was a friend a very long time ago [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 08:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
531519 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ 531518 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 08:15:00 +++$+++ 1.217171700E09 +++$+++ Not bothered if you are not interested for any reason - just the recent conversation about factiva reminded me that there might be reviews of books etc which i otherwise have diffs in finding easily - no big deal either way - it was just a thought  +++$+++ ::Not bothered if you are not interested for any reason - just the recent conversation about factiva reminded me that there might be reviews of books etc which i otherwise have diffs in finding easily - no big deal either way - it was just a thought [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 08:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
531520 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ 531519 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.217172120E09 +++$+++ Factiva has a heap of info about the Anna Livia Dublin International Opera Festival... so far the only article about the woman herself is the same Guardian one linked to in the article. I'll keep looking  +++$+++ :::Factiva has a heap of info about the Anna Livia Dublin International Opera Festival... so far the only article about the woman herself is the same Guardian one linked to in the article. I'll keep looking [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
531521 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ 531520 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.217172240E09 +++$+++ Also an Anna Livia airport lounge and radio station...  +++$+++ ::::Also an Anna Livia airport lounge and radio station... [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
531522 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ 531521 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.217172420E09 +++$+++ Problem is that annas parents decided to name her after the first words in a james joyce novel and there are doppelgangers and echoes around the net like something out of doctor who - theres an anna livia in every nook and cranny - but her original pen name was anna livia - and boy what a google mess that is  +++$+++ :::::Problem is that annas parents decided to name her after the first words in a james joyce novel and there are doppelgangers and echoes around the net like something out of doctor who - theres an anna livia in every nook and cranny - but her original pen name was anna livia - and boy what a google mess that is [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 08:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
531523 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ 531522 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.217172540E09 +++$+++ sure that her mother is still here in perth somewhere but didnt contact at the time of annas death - had lost contact +++$+++ ::::::sure that her mother is still here in perth somewhere but didnt contact at the time of annas death - had lost contact[[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 08:29, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
531524 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ 531523 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 08:31:00 +++$+++ 1.217172660E09 +++$+++ My list of boolean \"NOT\"s keeps growing. Will get there eventually.  +++$+++ :::::::My list of boolean "NOT"s keeps growing. Will get there eventually. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
531525 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ 531524 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.217172960E09 +++$+++ Feel free to drop it if its  problem - in january i was trying by the book names rather than her name - in the case that oggle or clusty had anythng - as I was getting notability issues (with a publication list like that!) hints from other eds -  I wasnt sure where to hunt for reviews or arts - but hey maybe i need to return to reid or murdoch uni libraries and try what i can find from their databases - hope i hvent caused a problem - im off for a while now - thanks for offering anyways  +++$+++ ::::::::Feel free to drop it if its  problem - in january i was trying by the book names rather than her name - in the case that oggle or clusty had anythng - as I was getting notability issues (with a publication list like that!) hints from other eds -  I wasnt sure where to hunt for reviews or arts - but hey maybe i need to return to reid or murdoch uni libraries and try what i can find from their databases - hope i hvent caused a problem - im off for a while now - thanks for offering anyways [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 08:36, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
531526 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531516 +++$+++ 531525 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.217173140E09 +++$+++ I have found a couple of articles related to Berkeley, so it's not hopeless. Will check other databases too just in case.  +++$+++ :::::::::I have found a couple of articles related to Berkeley, so it's not hopeless. Will check other databases too just in case. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

269374 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-04 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.233755640E09 +++$+++ '''Mattisse''', I have not said a remotely negative word about you in more than 6 months, and have been more than courteous to you despite our turbulent past. I have gone out of my way to twice unilaterally apologize to you ''(something you still have yet to ever return)'', extend my hand in friendship to you, and send you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=prev&oldid=263081246 encouragement] during your difficult recent RfC tribulations. I purposely chose not to be a part of your RfC because I remained optimistic that you would realize that your abrasive actions, only stain the many valuable things you bring to Wikipedia. [[User:Coppertwig]] for his\/her part has gone even further than I have and continually always deals with you in a respectful manner. Still you insist on casting aspersions against us as some \"courteous cabal\" who secretly works together in unison to be as friendly to others as we possibly can. You find our commitment ''(and Copper's advice to me)'' on civility to be a threat for some reason, and interpret it as a sinister plot to push POV, or prevent you from editing an article -[[Che Guevara]]-, that Coppertwig has repeatedly invited you to collaborate with us on. Now out of the blue you begin with a unprovoked attack against myself and Copper [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Che_Guevara&diff=prev&oldid=268416145 1]. I removed this for your own good. Because I believe you are a good person, and I know that you sometimes let your emotions get the best of you ''(as I also do)''. Luckily, I have Copper to remind me when I slip up and get frustrated, however you lack such a safety net, and it unfortunately results in you sporadically showing your anger in situations as mentioned in the RfC. I am not sure what I need to say to implore you to not blemish your full Wiki potential with these continued episodes. The last thing I want is to have you as an enemy, or to see you attacked for your behavior ... however you make this commitment to civility very difficult with such actions as your recent decision to turn an article's talk page into a [[WP:Forum]] to voice your concerns against me and Copper. I will revert this one more time, in the hopes that you will let it be, and take some time to cool off. You and I both know that the result of this will only be more frustration for both of us, and that it will distract us both from our more meaningful tasks of editing articles. Please, take this message to heart and learn to let things go. You literally just posted that you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Che_Guevara&diff=prev&oldid=268417930 \"can't breathe\"] because you are so frustrated that Copper and myself ''(do the basic task)'' of responding to messages on the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Che_Guevara talk page] of Che Guevara. There is no reason for you to get yourself so worked up about nothing. Thanks. &nbsp;&nbsp; +++$+++ '''Mattisse''', I have not said a remotely negative word about you in more than 6 months, and have been more than courteous to you despite our turbulent past. I have gone out of my way to twice unilaterally apologize to you ''(something you still have yet to ever return)'', extend my hand in friendship to you, and send you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=prev&oldid=263081246 encouragement] during your difficult recent RfC tribulations. I purposely chose not to be a part of your RfC because I remained optimistic that you would realize that your abrasive actions, only stain the many valuable things you bring to Wikipedia. [[User:Coppertwig]] for his/her part has gone even further than I have and continually always deals with you in a respectful manner. Still you insist on casting aspersions against us as some "courteous cabal" who secretly works together in unison to be as friendly to others as we possibly can. You find our commitment ''(and Copper's advice to me)'' on civility to be a threat for some reason, and interpret it as a sinister plot to push POV, or prevent you from editing an article -[[Che Guevara]]-, that Coppertwig has repeatedly invited you to collaborate with us on. Now out of the blue you begin with a unprovoked attack against myself and Copper [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Che_Guevara&diff=prev&oldid=268416145 1]. I removed this for your own good. Because I believe you are a good person, and I know that you sometimes let your emotions get the best of you ''(as I also do)''. Luckily, I have Copper to remind me when I slip up and get frustrated, however you lack such a safety net, and it unfortunately results in you sporadically showing your anger in situations as mentioned in the RfC. I am not sure what I need to say to implore you to not blemish your full Wiki potential with these continued episodes. The last thing I want is to have you as an enemy, or to see you attacked for your behavior ... however you make this commitment to civility very difficult with such actions as your recent decision to turn an article's talk page into a [[WP:Forum]] to voice your concerns against me and Copper. I will revert this one more time, in the hopes that you will let it be, and take some time to cool off. You and I both know that the result of this will only be more frustration for both of us, and that it will distract us both from our more meaningful tasks of editing articles. Please, take this message to heart and learn to let things go. You literally just posted that you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Che_Guevara&diff=prev&oldid=268417930 "can't breathe"] because you are so frustrated that Copper and myself ''(do the basic task)'' of responding to messages on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Che_Guevara talk page] of Che Guevara. There is no reason for you to get yourself so worked up about nothing. Thanks. &nbsp;&nbsp;[[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]])RT 05:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
269375 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269374 +++$+++ 269374 +++$+++ 2009-02-04 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.233762240E09 +++$+++ Redthoreau, I thank you for your very kind response. I have no problem with you, as you are up front and I understand that you are passionate about the subject matter. What I do not like is the collusion that is not up front. All that I ask, is for the liasions between editors be disclosed and transparent to the editors attempting to edit the article, rather than being covert. I believe a dispassionate glance at the article history tells the story.[http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&page=Che+Guevara&since=&until=&grouped=on&hideminor=on&order=-edit_count&max=100&order=-edit_count&format=html] Do you not wonder why Polaris999 refuses to edit the article that was once so important to Polaris999? I believe that your style is overt, so I do not in any way blame you. Please understand. I am equally passionate but I have no person giving advice as to how to ensure my point of view dominates and to help me implement it.  When two collude, then they can defeat honest attempts to communicate by individual editors. I feel that this is what is happening. Again, I do not think that this collusion is your style, other than the fact you delete your talk page and do not archive, so that it is extremely difficult to document this issue. <small> Added to this, is the tendency to whisper which is very annoying to those of us who prefer outright disclosure.<\/small> Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Redthoreau, I thank you for your very kind response. I have no problem with you, as you are up front and I understand that you are passionate about the subject matter. What I do not like is the collusion that is not up front. All that I ask, is for the liasions between editors be disclosed and transparent to the editors attempting to edit the article, rather than being covert. I believe a dispassionate glance at the article history tells the story.[http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&page=Che+Guevara&since=&until=&grouped=on&hideminor=on&order=-edit_count&max=100&order=-edit_count&format=html] Do you not wonder why Polaris999 refuses to edit the article that was once so important to Polaris999? I believe that your style is overt, so I do not in any way blame you. Please understand. I am equally passionate but I have no person giving advice as to how to ensure my point of view dominates and to help me implement it.  When two collude, then they can defeat honest attempts to communicate by individual editors. I feel that this is what is happening. Again, I do not think that this collusion is your style, other than the fact you delete your talk page and do not archive, so that it is extremely difficult to document this issue. <small> Added to this, is the tendency to whisper which is very annoying to those of us who prefer outright disclosure.</small> Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 07:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
269376 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269374 +++$+++ 269375 +++$+++ 2009-02-04 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.233785340E09 +++$+++ '''Mattisse''', to specifically answer some of your concerns. I don't view Copper and my communications as \"collusion\". If it were so, then all collaboration would be. I also am not sure why you define simple talk page comments to me to be liaisons. I wouldn't classify our current discussion as a \"liaison\", so why is it so when me and Copper do so. I also am not sure how Copper leaving me a message on my talk page is \"covert\". If anything Copper has my email ''(which I publicly disclose)'' and could easily 'covertly' communicate with me, if that was our intention ... but it is not. In reference to \"whispering\", I believe that you are misreading Copper's practice of simply placing any critiques\/criticisms in <small>small font.<\/small> It is sort of his\/her modus operandi, and not an attempt to hide or conceal anything ''(as it is still easily readable to all)'' and not a \"code\" or something. Lastly, it seems that Copper has [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Che_Guevara&diff=prev&oldid=268465243 reverted] my removal of your talk page comments ... thus '''I am going to politely request that you remove these yourself.''' I feel that such comments will only \"poison the well\" and reflect poorly on you, as you are far more reasonable than they appear. Moreover, if they remain then I will have to counter your claims with how I disagree with your assessment ''(and blaming me for the article losing FA status)'', and we both know where that will lead and possibly spiral into. So please will you remove those comments yourself? I believe that such an action will go a long way to displaying your commitment to taking some of those RfC comments to heart. There is no reason to feed the unfair stereotypes that you believe you have been painted with. &nbsp;&nbsp; +++$+++ :: '''Mattisse''', to specifically answer some of your concerns. I don't view Copper and my communications as "collusion". If it were so, then all collaboration would be. I also am not sure why you define simple talk page comments to me to be liaisons. I wouldn't classify our current discussion as a "liaison", so why is it so when me and Copper do so. I also am not sure how Copper leaving me a message on my talk page is "covert". If anything Copper has my email ''(which I publicly disclose)'' and could easily 'covertly' communicate with me, if that was our intention ... but it is not. In reference to "whispering", I believe that you are misreading Copper's practice of simply placing any critiques/criticisms in <small>small font.</small> It is sort of his/her modus operandi, and not an attempt to hide or conceal anything ''(as it is still easily readable to all)'' and not a "code" or something. Lastly, it seems that Copper has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Che_Guevara&diff=prev&oldid=268465243 reverted] my removal of your talk page comments ... thus '''I am going to politely request that you remove these yourself.''' I feel that such comments will only "poison the well" and reflect poorly on you, as you are far more reasonable than they appear. Moreover, if they remain then I will have to counter your claims with how I disagree with your assessment ''(and blaming me for the article losing FA status)'', and we both know where that will lead and possibly spiral into. So please will you remove those comments yourself? I believe that such an action will go a long way to displaying your commitment to taking some of those RfC comments to heart. There is no reason to feed the unfair stereotypes that you believe you have been painted with. &nbsp;&nbsp;[[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]])RT 14:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
269377 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269374 +++$+++ 269376 +++$+++ 2009-02-04 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.233808680E09 +++$+++ [[User:Redthoreau|<font color=\"#FF3333\">'''Red'''<\/font><font color=\"#FFCC00\">'''thoreau'''<\/font>]], I truly appreciate your message and I feel you good will. As I said before, I like you and can empathize with you. Please do not see me as an enemy. The problem is that we disagree on some issues. But I have little juice left in me to to work on this page. especially as I would have to contend with the two of you. I am so much more interested in what Che actually did versus is \"icon\" status. So there we differ. But if I had a free hand on the page, I would probably do as you have, and put the information in that I see as relevant. I wish us to be friends and I will not hassle you any more about the Che article. I just wanted to have my last say, in case someone came along who whas really interested in the dynamics of what happend to lower the standards of the page. It is not that important to me anymore. Please understand and be my friend. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::: [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]], I truly appreciate your message and I feel you good will. As I said before, I like you and can empathize with you. Please do not see me as an enemy. The problem is that we disagree on some issues. But I have little juice left in me to to work on this page. especially as I would have to contend with the two of you. I am so much more interested in what Che actually did versus is "icon" status. So there we differ. But if I had a free hand on the page, I would probably do as you have, and put the information in that I see as relevant. I wish us to be friends and I will not hassle you any more about the Che article. I just wanted to have my last say, in case someone came along who whas really interested in the dynamics of what happend to lower the standards of the page. It is not that important to me anymore. Please understand and be my friend. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
269378 +++$+++ Coppertwig +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269374 +++$+++ 269377 +++$+++ 2009-02-05 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.233870540E09 +++$+++ I agree with Redthoreau that your article talk page comments are not helpful.  You've posted numerous comments to [[Talk:Che Guevara]] in the last couple of months, almost none of which contribute a single word that could be interpreted as a suggested edit to the article.  If you're not going to edit the article or discuss article content on the article talk page, I would prefer that you not edit the article talk page.  If you're not going to participate in editing the article, please remember that you've called that your \"last say\", and stick to that. I think deleting or striking out your comments would be a good idea. (If anyone replies to them, then striking them out would be a better idea than deleting them.) <span style=\"color:Green; font-size:17pt;\">\u263a<\/span> +++$+++ :::: I agree with Redthoreau that your article talk page comments are not helpful.  You've posted numerous comments to [[Talk:Che Guevara]] in the last couple of months, almost none of which contribute a single word that could be interpreted as a suggested edit to the article.  If you're not going to edit the article or discuss article content on the article talk page, I would prefer that you not edit the article talk page.  If you're not going to participate in editing the article, please remember that you've called that your "last say", and stick to that. I think deleting or striking out your comments would be a good idea. (If anyone replies to them, then striking them out would be a better idea than deleting them.) <span style="color:Green; font-size:17pt;">☺</span>[[User:Coppertwig|Coppertwig]] ([[User talk:Coppertwig|talk]]) 13:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
269379 +++$+++ Redthoreau +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269374 +++$+++ 269378 +++$+++ 2009-02-05 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.233872160E09 +++$+++ '''Mattisse''', I don't agree with your analysis that the pages standards have been lowered, but on that issue we will just have to agree to disagree. However, '''I would be more than willing to be your friend :o) , and I appreciate your commitment to \"not hassle me anymore about the Che article\"'''. I believe that such a commitment will be best for both of us in the long run. You add countless things to this wiki project, and I feel that your talents are best used when you are not in confrontation, but rather in adding your wiki knowledge to the hundreds of various articles you like to edit. As for your talk page comments, I will let you decide what to do with those. I don't believe that they help your image, and they aren't exactly a good way to begin a friendship, but if you wish for them to stand as your parting testament, then there isn't much I can do about that. I do understand where you are coming from, and to reiterate will be happy to \"be your friend\" per your request. Thanks. &nbsp;&nbsp; +++$+++ ::::: '''Mattisse''', I don't agree with your analysis that the pages standards have been lowered, but on that issue we will just have to agree to disagree. However, '''I would be more than willing to be your friend :o) , and I appreciate your commitment to "not hassle me anymore about the Che article"'''. I believe that such a commitment will be best for both of us in the long run. You add countless things to this wiki project, and I feel that your talents are best used when you are not in confrontation, but rather in adding your wiki knowledge to the hundreds of various articles you like to edit. As for your talk page comments, I will let you decide what to do with those. I don't believe that they help your image, and they aren't exactly a good way to begin a friendship, but if you wish for them to stand as your parting testament, then there isn't much I can do about that. I do understand where you are coming from, and to reiterate will be happy to "be your friend" per your request. Thanks. &nbsp;&nbsp;[[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]])RT 14:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
269380 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269374 +++$+++ 269379 +++$+++ 2009-02-05 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.233880740E09 +++$+++ [[User:Redthoreau|<font color=\"#FF3333\">'''Red'''<\/font><font color=\"#FFCC00\">'''thoreau'''<\/font>]], I know you have your view and I accept that. I do value you much more as a friend and would much rather have a relationship of good will toward you than worry about the article. Again, I thank you for your kind words toward me. You have a greater emotional investment in the article than I do, as my interest is purely historical. So I am willing to let go and let you have the article without input from me. I have not been trying to \"hassle you\" but to object to other procedures and issues instilled by another editor (which I do not consider your fault). I believe that the time for the Che page to be upgraded is not now but  will be in the future, as the history of Cuba and Che moves on from its current focus in the article on past cultural phenomena, to incorporate a more recent perspective, as more data will undoubtedly  come to light as regimes change and archives are opened and made public (hopefully). I am always willing to try to help you in others ways, if I can, as I do like you very much and understand your emotional commitment, I frequently empathize with the situations you find yourself in, and very much want you as a friend. Again, I thank you so much for your recent input. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::[[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]], I know you have your view and I accept that. I do value you much more as a friend and would much rather have a relationship of good will toward you than worry about the article. Again, I thank you for your kind words toward me. You have a greater emotional investment in the article than I do, as my interest is purely historical. So I am willing to let go and let you have the article without input from me. I have not been trying to "hassle you" but to object to other procedures and issues instilled by another editor (which I do not consider your fault). I believe that the time for the Che page to be upgraded is not now but  will be in the future, as the history of Cuba and Che moves on from its current focus in the article on past cultural phenomena, to incorporate a more recent perspective, as more data will undoubtedly  come to light as regimes change and archives are opened and made public (hopefully). I am always willing to try to help you in others ways, if I can, as I do like you very much and understand your emotional commitment, I frequently empathize with the situations you find yourself in, and very much want you as a friend. Again, I thank you so much for your recent input. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
269381 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269374 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-08 10:26:00 +++$+++ 1.234117560E09 +++$+++ If you strongly disagree with what I have just written, please reply on ''my'' Talk page. -- +++$+++ ::::::::If you strongly disagree with what I have just written, please reply on ''my'' Talk page. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 10:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
269382 +++$+++ Coppertwig +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269374 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-09 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.234212720E09 +++$+++ Good point. Thank you for pointing that out.  I've struck out my comment. I hope it didn't interfere. <span style=\"color:Orange; font-size:15pt;\">\u263a<\/span> +++$+++ :::::::::Good point. Thank you for pointing that out.  I've struck out my comment. I hope it didn't interfere. <span style="color:Orange; font-size:15pt;">☺</span>[[User:Coppertwig|Coppertwig]] ([[User talk:Coppertwig|talk]]) 12:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

7231 +++$+++ Cinemaniac86 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7231 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-22 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.256210220E09 +++$+++ So, as for Top Chef, I know that we're blessed with several immense talents this season, but am I the only one vehemently bored by their lacks of personalities (save for Ash, who I only wish had the skills to compensate and he'd surely be the fan favorite) and aggravated by the general obnoxious manner most of the chefs operate with? Ironically, I like Mike, though I hated him Episode 1 for being such a misogynist. But his flirtation and ignored bromance with Ash was kinda cute. And at least he's got a personality. Jennifer is easily my favorite though, and Kevin's my second--although I am seriously hoping he loses, because I am just tired of seeing female chefs disintegrate the way they do here. S5 had such a great cast of females and they wasted it with seriously misguided eliminations (Leah shoulda went over Ariane and the whole season would've played out differently). I'll save any further comments I have for later. Your thoughts?-- +++$+++ So, as for Top Chef, I know that we're blessed with several immense talents this season, but am I the only one vehemently bored by their lacks of personalities (save for Ash, who I only wish had the skills to compensate and he'd surely be the fan favorite) and aggravated by the general obnoxious manner most of the chefs operate with? Ironically, I like Mike, though I hated him Episode 1 for being such a misogynist. But his flirtation and ignored bromance with Ash was kinda cute. And at least he's got a personality. Jennifer is easily my favorite though, and Kevin's my second--although I am seriously hoping he loses, because I am just tired of seeing female chefs disintegrate the way they do here. S5 had such a great cast of females and they wasted it with seriously misguided eliminations (Leah shoulda went over Ariane and the whole season would've played out differently). I'll save any further comments I have for later. Your thoughts?--[[User:Cinemaniac86|Cinemaniac86]]<sup>[[User talk:Cinemaniac86|Oy_gevalt.]]</sup> 04:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
7232 +++$+++ Cinemaniac86 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7231 +++$+++ 7231 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.256743740E09 +++$+++ Thanks to the painkillers, I pretty much typed out everything on my mind. Oy vey. Well, I hope this doesn't overwhelm you from replying! I'll leave it at this novella-state for now. Talk to you soon. Oh, and fyi, my name is James. You're probably the first on Wiki to know that. Whoa.-- +++$+++ :Thanks to the painkillers, I pretty much typed out everything on my mind. Oy vey. Well, I hope this doesn't overwhelm you from replying! I'll leave it at this novella-state for now. Talk to you soon. Oh, and fyi, my name is James. You're probably the first on Wiki to know that. Whoa.--[[User:Cinemaniac86|Cinemaniac]]<sup>[[User talk:Cinemaniac86|86]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Cinemaniac86|Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire]]</sub> 08:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
7233 +++$+++ Cinemaniac86 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7231 +++$+++ 7232 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.257495540E09 +++$+++ On a more positive note, I'm gathering that you are also a fan of the fantastically underrated ''[[Southland (TV series)|Southland]]''? =) If I didn't have to finish last week's ''Survivor'' before this week's comes on, I'd ramble on about how much I'm loving it. But I'll let you speak first.-- +++$+++ ::On a more positive note, I'm gathering that you are also a fan of the fantastically underrated ''[[Southland (TV series)|Southland]]''? =) If I didn't have to finish last week's ''Survivor'' before this week's comes on, I'd ramble on about how much I'm loving it. But I'll let you speak first.--[[User:Cinemaniac86|Cinemaniac]]<sup>[[User talk:Cinemaniac86|86]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Cinemaniac86|Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire]]</sub> 00:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

7234 +++$+++ AussieLegend +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-06 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.257556020E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_Burn_Notice_episodes&action=historysubmit&diff=324289577&oldid=324289269 this edit], I assume you meant [[WP:OVERLINK]], not [[WP:OL|Wikipedia:Overlistification]]. While [[Wikipedia:Linking#Repeated links]] does indeed state \"''In general, link only the first occurrence of an item''\", it goes on to say, \"''This is a rule of thumb that has many exceptions, including....tables, in which each row should be able to stand on its own.''\" Each episode entry is seen as a row in a table, so linking the same field data in different entries is appropriate, although it can be messy. -- +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Burn_Notice_episodes&action=historysubmit&diff=324289577&oldid=324289269 this edit], I assume you meant [[WP:OVERLINK]], not [[WP:OL|Wikipedia:Overlistification]]. While [[Wikipedia:Linking#Repeated links]] does indeed state "''In general, link only the first occurrence of an item''", it goes on to say, "''This is a rule of thumb that has many exceptions, including....tables, in which each row should be able to stand on its own.''" Each episode entry is seen as a row in a table, so linking the same field data in different entries is appropriate, although it can be messy. --[[User:AussieLegend|AussieLegend]] ([[User talk:AussieLegend|talk]]) 17:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
7235 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7234 +++$+++ 7234 +++$+++ 2009-11-08 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.257743520E09 +++$+++ I do appreciate the heads-up on the gaffe re: overlinking v. overlisting!  Thank you for that.   +++$+++ : I do appreciate the heads-up on the gaffe re: overlinking v. overlisting!  Thank you for that.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 21:12, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

7236 +++$+++ Dbrodbeck +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-06 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.257569280E09 +++$+++ Longest subject header ever....  anyway, yeah let's report the 3rr violation, how do we do that?  I have not done that before.   +++$+++ Longest subject header ever....  anyway, yeah let's report the 3rr violation, how do we do that?  I have not done that before.  [[User:Dbrodbeck|Dbrodbeck]] ([[User talk:Dbrodbeck|talk]]) 20:48, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
7237 +++$+++ Cinemaniac86 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7236 +++$+++ 7236 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.257960720E09 +++$+++ Just a heads-up: Left you an acerbic reply on the above user's talk page. If you're Don and Dbrodbeck is Bert, I must be Roger in this ''Mad Men'' task force.-- +++$+++ :Just a heads-up: Left you an acerbic reply on the above user's talk page. If you're Don and Dbrodbeck is Bert, I must be Roger in this ''Mad Men'' task force.--[[User:Cinemaniac86|Cinemaniac]]<sup>[[User talk:Cinemaniac86|86]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Cinemaniac86|Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire]]</sub> 09:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
7238 +++$+++ Dbrodbeck +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7236 +++$+++ 7237 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.257969540E09 +++$+++ I like to think of us more like The Unit, can I be Jonas Blaine?  +++$+++ ::I like to think of us more like The Unit, can I be Jonas Blaine? [[User:Dbrodbeck|Dbrodbeck]] ([[User talk:Dbrodbeck|talk]]) 11:59, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
7239 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7236 +++$+++ 7238 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.257995280E09 +++$+++ Too much testosterone for me, boys!   +++$+++ ::: Too much testosterone for me, boys!  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 19:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

269383 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-07 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.234050420E09 +++$+++ Matisse, your note to Lightmouse, and your support otherwise of the cause, is much appreciated. Lightmouse has been beaten about, bloodied and bruised, for all his skill and hard work. It's manifestly unjust.  +++$+++ Matisse, your note to Lightmouse, and your support otherwise of the cause, is much appreciated. Lightmouse has been beaten about, bloodied and bruised, for all his skill and hard work. It's manifestly unjust. [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 15:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
269384 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269383 +++$+++ 269383 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.234073340E09 +++$+++ As an addendum, it is good that you removed yourself from the debate when you did. The whole issue is a mess, and it is not worth your time to argue against a few editors making ''ad hominem'' arguments. Nevertheless, your support and input have been very helpful.  +++$+++ :As an addendum, it is good that you removed yourself from the debate when you did. The whole issue is a mess, and it is not worth your time to argue against a few editors making ''ad hominem'' arguments. Nevertheless, your support and input have been very helpful. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 22:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
269385 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269383 +++$+++ 269384 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.234073640E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your words. It is hard to understand what is happening, or that the direction it seems to be going in will solve anything. I do feel for Lightmouse and cannot understand how Lightmouse became a target.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Thank you for your words. It is hard to understand what is happening, or that the direction it seems to be going in will solve anything. I do feel for Lightmouse and cannot understand how Lightmouse became a target.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

7240 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-09 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.257758700E09 +++$+++ '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a [[WP:BOT|bot]]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- +++$+++ '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a [[WP:BOT|bot]]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 01:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
7241 +++$+++ AussieLegend +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7240 +++$+++ 7240 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.257771120E09 +++$+++ I don't know your feelings about the result of this AfD but I think that the close was premature with an inappropriate result. The consensus was clearly to merge to the main episode list but the closer, who wasn't an admin, decided to merge everythng to the main article. The AfD was also closed after less than 11 hours while [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How an AfD discussion is closed]] says that AfDs run for seven days. I don't follow this program so I'm not going to take it to DRV. -- +++$+++ :I don't know your feelings about the result of this AfD but I think that the close was premature with an inappropriate result. The consensus was clearly to merge to the main episode list but the closer, who wasn't an admin, decided to merge everythng to the main article. The AfD was also closed after less than 11 hours while [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How an AfD discussion is closed]] says that AfDs run for seven days. I don't follow this program so I'm not going to take it to DRV. --[[User:AussieLegend|AussieLegend]] ([[User talk:AussieLegend|talk]]) 04:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
7242 +++$+++ Grk1011 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7240 +++$+++ 7241 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.257798360E09 +++$+++ I too thought the rough consensus was to merge into the episode list, not main article.  +++$+++ ::I too thought the rough consensus was to merge into the episode list, not main article. [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 12:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
7243 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7240 +++$+++ 7242 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.257811860E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure how this all landed on my talk page other than that I was the last to respond before the premature closing of the discussion and that Aussie and I have been chatting on another subject.  I suppose what will have to happen now is that someone who cares to can pursue it beyond this point, although frankly, as badly as the show's ratings have begun to fall, I'm not sure it's going to be around all that long anyway.  I left a little note on the originating editor's (Magioladitis) page so he\/she can come take a look.   +++$+++ ::: I'm not sure how this all landed on my talk page other than that I was the last to respond before the premature closing of the discussion and that Aussie and I have been chatting on another subject.  I suppose what will have to happen now is that someone who cares to can pursue it beyond this point, although frankly, as badly as the show's ratings have begun to fall, I'm not sure it's going to be around all that long anyway.  I left a little note on the originating editor's (Magioladitis) page so he/she can come take a look.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 16:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
7244 +++$+++ Grk1011 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7240 +++$+++ 7243 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.257814380E09 +++$+++ Lol. Your talk page was in my watchlist from our prior communication. That is how I found out about the deletion debate and how saw that someone else felt the same way I did.  +++$+++ ::::Lol. Your talk page was in my watchlist from our prior communication. That is how I found out about the deletion debate and how saw that someone else felt the same way I did. [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 16:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
7245 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7240 +++$+++ 7244 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.257814620E09 +++$+++ That clears that up.  It don't mind the discussion; I'm actually rather enjoying it.  I was just afraid someone thought I'd started the whole thing and would expect some action on my part.  I think we all agree that the editor in question overstepped in closing the AfD so early.  But given how quickly I'm losing interest in the show, and that I know next to nothing about a DRV, I wanted to be sure everyone knew I wasn't planning to make the next move.   +++$+++ ::::: That clears that up.  It don't mind the discussion; I'm actually rather enjoying it.  I was just afraid someone thought I'd started the whole thing and would expect some action on my part.  I think we all agree that the editor in question overstepped in closing the AfD so early.  But given how quickly I'm losing interest in the show, and that I know next to nothing about a DRV, I wanted to be sure everyone knew I wasn't planning to make the next move.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 16:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

269386 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-07 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.234074300E09 +++$+++ Hey there, thanks for offering to pick up the GA review for [[Spider-Man]]. :) I just wanted to point out that there were apparently two prior GA nominations for this article per the talk page, but I haven't found any evidence of a review being done previously.  +++$+++ Hey there, thanks for offering to pick up the GA review for [[Spider-Man]]. :) I just wanted to point out that there were apparently two prior GA nominations for this article per the talk page, but I haven't found any evidence of a review being done previously. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 22:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
269387 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269386 +++$+++ 269386 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.234074600E09 +++$+++ O.K. I'll look around and see if there is one that is not showing up for some reason.  &mdash; +++$+++ :O.K. I'll look around and see if there is one that is not showing up for some reason.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
269388 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269386 +++$+++ 269387 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.234076880E09 +++$+++ It may be that the GA process changed in the past two years, is all, and that a review back in the day consisted of little more than some talk page comments. For example, [[Talk:Spider-Man\/Archive03#Re:GA nom... suggestions|this]] (and [[Talk:Spider-Man\/Archive03#GA FAILED|this]]) might be all that exists of review one, and [[Talk:Spider-Man\/Archive03#Failed GA|this]] might be all there is for the second review. PS, I was considering working on some of the recent items mentioned by Emperor on the talk page, but I'll let you do what you're doing first. :)  +++$+++ ::It may be that the GA process changed in the past two years, is all, and that a review back in the day consisted of little more than some talk page comments. For example, [[Talk:Spider-Man/Archive03#Re:GA nom... suggestions|this]] (and [[Talk:Spider-Man/Archive03#GA FAILED|this]]) might be all that exists of review one, and [[Talk:Spider-Man/Archive03#Failed GA|this]] might be all there is for the second review. PS, I was considering working on some of the recent items mentioned by Emperor on the talk page, but I'll let you do what you're doing first. :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 23:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
269389 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269386 +++$+++ 269388 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.234077540E09 +++$+++ I don't know. According to the article history,  the article failed GA October 2, 2006 and February 21, 2007, but there is no review there, so maybe those GA nom suggestions refer to that. I do think that the separate \"GA review\" page used now, which is relatively new, is an improvement and prevents that kind of confusion. Now a new review page opens every time the article is nominated, GA1, GA2 etc. &mdash; +++$+++ :::I don't know. According to the article history,  the article failed GA October 2, 2006 and February 21, 2007, but there is no review there, so maybe those GA nom suggestions refer to that. I do think that the separate "GA review" page used now, which is relatively new, is an improvement and prevents that kind of confusion. Now a new review page opens every time the article is nominated, GA1, GA2 etc. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
269390 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269386 +++$+++ 269389 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.234078020E09 +++$+++ Agreed 100% - the current method is a way better means of focusing everyone's attention, presenting the review, and keeping track of the discussion.  +++$+++ ::::Agreed 100% - the current method is a way better means of focusing everyone's attention, presenting the review, and keeping track of the discussion. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 23:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

525495 +++$+++ Phgao +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-06 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.191657300E09 +++$+++ I'm enjoying your \"stub flood\" (oh it rhymes!), as I'm doing NP patrol, a welcome sight after constantly seeing test pages.  +++$+++ I'm enjoying your "stub flood" (oh it rhymes!), as I'm doing NP patrol, a welcome sight after constantly seeing test pages. [[User:Phgao|Phgao]] 00:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
525496 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525495 +++$+++ 525495 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.191657780E09 +++$+++ Thanks -- and if monitoring all those test pages give you headaches, perhaps one of these pharma stubs may be of interest to you someday. :) -- +++$+++ :Thanks -- and if monitoring all those test pages give you headaches, perhaps one of these pharma stubs may be of interest to you someday. :) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:03, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
525497 +++$+++ Phgao +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525495 +++$+++ 525496 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.191658980E09 +++$+++ Yes perhaps, I've got to ask, those medicines are produced by med companies, and therefore, if I were to expand one, would not that be advertising for that medicine, especially if there isn't any news articles or notable sources for them? I need some clarification on this.  +++$+++ ::Yes perhaps, I've got to ask, those medicines are produced by med companies, and therefore, if I were to expand one, would not that be advertising for that medicine, especially if there isn't any news articles or notable sources for them? I need some clarification on this. [[User:Phgao|Phgao]] 01:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
525498 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525495 +++$+++ 525497 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.191659220E09 +++$+++ If you have serious concerns, that would probably be a question better directed to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pharmacology]]. -- +++$+++ :::If you have serious concerns, that would probably be a question better directed to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pharmacology]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:27, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
525499 +++$+++ Edgar181 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525495 +++$+++ 525495 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.191659700E09 +++$+++ Hey...I'm trying to clear out some of the list of drug pages needing a structure drawing.  But no matter how many I do, the list keeps getting longer.  :)  -- +++$+++ :Hey...I'm trying to clear out some of the list of drug pages needing a structure drawing.  But no matter how many I do, the list keeps getting longer.  :)  --[[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 01:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
525500 +++$+++ Phgao +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525495 +++$+++ 525499 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.191660000E09 +++$+++ I feel for you :D  +++$+++ ::I feel for you :D [[User:Phgao|Phgao]] 01:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
525501 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525495 +++$+++ 525500 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.191660300E09 +++$+++ I can empathize -- I keep trying to fill up \"Category:Drug pages needing a structure drawing\", and [[User:Fvasconcellos|these]] [[User:Edgar181|two]] guys keep emptying out my beautiful long list. Still, [[The Myth of Sisyphus|the struggle itself is enough to fill a man's heart]]. :) -- +++$+++ :::I can empathize -- I keep trying to fill up "Category:Drug pages needing a structure drawing", and [[User:Fvasconcellos|these]] [[User:Edgar181|two]] guys keep emptying out my beautiful long list. Still, [[The Myth of Sisyphus|the struggle itself is enough to fill a man's heart]]. :) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 01:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
525502 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525495 +++$+++ 525501 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.191895380E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, we'll never beat it :) There will always be polymers, inorganics, obscure antibiotics with yet-undetermined structures... Seriously, thank you. I've been learning about some very interesting compounds I'd probably never find out about elsewhere, and if that's not one of the purposes of a ''bona fide'' encyclopedia, I don't know what is :)  +++$+++ ::::Don't worry, we'll never beat it :) There will always be polymers, inorganics, obscure antibiotics with yet-undetermined structures... Seriously, thank you. I've been learning about some very interesting compounds I'd probably never find out about elsewhere, and if that's not one of the purposes of a ''bona fide'' encyclopedia, I don't know what is :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 19:03, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

531532 +++$+++ Chimelel +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531532 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-29 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.217331360E09 +++$+++ Lauren Wheaton Bentley +++$+++ Lauren Wheaton Bentley[[User:Chimelel|Chimelel]] ([[User talk:Chimelel|talk]]) 04:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
531533 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531532 +++$+++ 531532 +++$+++ 2008-07-29 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.217333820E09 +++$+++ In regards to your bio specifically for Wikipedia, I suggest you post it to your user page first (e.g. at [[User:Chimelel\/Karen Wheaton]]. Ask some editors to take a look at it and make sure it's suitable. I'm happy to do this for you if you like. You need to make sure the new article uses [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and is written in a [[WP:NPOV|neutral]] way. If you need any help or further explanations, please contact me.  +++$+++ :In regards to your bio specifically for Wikipedia, I suggest you post it to your user page first (e.g. at [[User:Chimelel/Karen Wheaton]]. Ask some editors to take a look at it and make sure it's suitable. I'm happy to do this for you if you like. You need to make sure the new article uses [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and is written in a [[WP:NPOV|neutral]] way. If you need any help or further explanations, please contact me. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 05:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

269391 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269391 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-09 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.234168440E09 +++$+++ Thanks. :) I wasn't sure if this should be \"GA3\" or, since the other two were very limited reviews, if we should go with \"GA1\" to make things less confusing. I'll do my best to address your concerns throughout the week.  +++$+++ Thanks. :) I wasn't sure if this should be "GA3" or, since the other two were very limited reviews, if we should go with "GA1" to make things less confusing. I'll do my best to address your concerns throughout the week. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 00:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
269392 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269391 +++$+++ 269391 +++$+++ 2009-02-09 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.234168860E09 +++$+++ The \"GA1\" was automatically linked, and not something I have control over.  The GA number is coded into the nomination link, and for whatever reason the article's past reviews didn't \"count\". It doesn't matter in any real way whether this is the 1rst or the 10th. There is no penalty for having prior GA's. The only advantage of  prior reviews occurs if they contain relevant information pertinent to this review. &mdash; +++$+++ :The "GA1" was automatically linked, and not something I have control over.  The GA number is coded into the nomination link, and for whatever reason the article's past reviews didn't "count". It doesn't matter in any real way whether this is the 1rst or the 10th. There is no penalty for having prior GA's. The only advantage of  prior reviews occurs if they contain relevant information pertinent to this review. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
269393 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269391 +++$+++ 269392 +++$+++ 2009-02-09 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.234215000E09 +++$+++ Yep, and those two certainly didn't contain relevant information unless I was missing something. ;) OK, I'll see what I can do to get this article improved, and see what kind of support I can marshall from other editors as well. Might be very busy this week, but I can at least do ''some'' work.  +++$+++ ::Yep, and those two certainly didn't contain relevant information unless I was missing something. ;) OK, I'll see what I can do to get this article improved, and see what kind of support I can marshall from other editors as well. Might be very busy this week, but I can at least do ''some'' work. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 13:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

7250 +++$+++ Logical Fuzz +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-23 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.264250040E09 +++$+++ I have no idea what you \"prefer,\" but I did notice you were a contributor at the [[List of Trauma episodes]] page, so feel free to revert my \"fix\".  As a newbie to that page, I did not, in any way, mean to step on anyone's toes or create a war.  My main feeling is to make sure we compare apples with apples, at least.  As I have wandered around the TV list pages, I have realized that some pages do things differently and I want to try to \"go with the flow\".  I hope my rambling is making sense, and sorry again, for butting in with my \"fix\". -- +++$+++ I have no idea what you "prefer," but I did notice you were a contributor at the [[List of Trauma episodes]] page, so feel free to revert my "fix".  As a newbie to that page, I did not, in any way, mean to step on anyone's toes or create a war.  My main feeling is to make sure we compare apples with apples, at least.  As I have wandered around the TV list pages, I have realized that some pages do things differently and I want to try to "go with the flow".  I hope my rambling is making sense, and sorry again, for butting in with my "fix". --[[User:Logical Fuzz|Logical Fuzz]] ([[User talk:Logical Fuzz|talk]]) 04:34, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
7251 +++$+++ Logical Fuzz +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7250 +++$+++ 7250 +++$+++ 2010-01-23 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.264313640E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm glad I did not offend you, especially after I recently said that Rosie\/CB edits like a bull in a china shop. I was feeling bad about it.  Regarding the Live +7 day data, I agree that it is useful, especially in this world of DVRs.  I rarely see it though.  Funny you mention the averaging of fast nationals.  That drives me nuts, too! I recently got in-between a war that CB\/Rosie was having with someone else about just that.  Sometimes I think people just feel the need to be first to post data, and don't even look at it carefully.  Grrr, enough venting.  Anyway, I'm glad you were OK with my edit on the Trauma page.  -- +++$+++ :Well, I'm glad I did not offend you, especially after I recently said that Rosie/CB edits like a bull in a china shop. I was feeling bad about it.  Regarding the Live +7 day data, I agree that it is useful, especially in this world of DVRs.  I rarely see it though.  Funny you mention the averaging of fast nationals.  That drives me nuts, too! I recently got in-between a war that CB/Rosie was having with someone else about just that.  Sometimes I think people just feel the need to be first to post data, and don't even look at it carefully.  Grrr, enough venting.  Anyway, I'm glad you were OK with my edit on the Trauma page.  --[[User:Logical Fuzz|Logical Fuzz]] ([[User talk:Logical Fuzz|talk]]) 22:14, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

7252 +++$+++ Grk1011 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7252 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-24 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.264384860E09 +++$+++ I'm looking for an opinion on how to further improve the ratings table for The Mentalist as seen [[The_Mentalist#Season_2_.282009.E2.80.9310.29_weekly_ratings|here]]. I made a source column since the info for 4 of the columns come from the same source, but the rank has a different source each week. Do you think I should just leave it the way it is an give each rank its own source or should i put a ref number next to each number in the table?  +++$+++ I'm looking for an opinion on how to further improve the ratings table for The Mentalist as seen [[The_Mentalist#Season_2_.282009.E2.80.9310.29_weekly_ratings|here]]. I made a source column since the info for 4 of the columns come from the same source, but the rank has a different source each week. Do you think I should just leave it the way it is an give each rank its own source or should i put a ref number next to each number in the table? [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 18:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
7253 +++$+++ Grk1011 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7252 +++$+++ 7252 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.264388940E09 +++$+++ I didn't make the table in the first place, I just saw that it needed some help and tracked down a few missing numbers. The suggestions you made make sense and to be honest, I have no idea what the ratings, share, etc mean. I plan on moving the tables to the episode page at some point which will allow me to remove the viewers column from the plot summary area.  +++$+++ :I didn't make the table in the first place, I just saw that it needed some help and tracked down a few missing numbers. The suggestions you made make sense and to be honest, I have no idea what the ratings, share, etc mean. I plan on moving the tables to the episode page at some point which will allow me to remove the viewers column from the plot summary area. [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 19:09, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

531541 +++$+++ Orion2004 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-30 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.217421000E09 +++$+++ I've just gone over the Conflict with editor page. I think ''you'' need to take a closer look at this page regarding your own actions. As advised by the article, I am walking away from this, and wish no further contact from you. I '''strongly''' suggest you do the same.  +++$+++ I've just gone over the Conflict with editor page. I think ''you'' need to take a closer look at this page regarding your own actions. As advised by the article, I am walking away from this, and wish no further contact from you. I '''strongly''' suggest you do the same. [[User:Orion2004|Orion2004]] ([[User talk:Orion2004|talk]]) 05:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
531542 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531541 +++$+++ 531541 +++$+++ 2008-07-30 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.217421300E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but I'm already familiar with that page. Take the time away from the article to read more policies and familiarise yourself with how the encyclopedia works. If you have any questions when you've cooled down, feel free to ask me or another editor.  +++$+++ :Thanks, but I'm already familiar with that page. Take the time away from the article to read more policies and familiarise yourself with how the encyclopedia works. If you have any questions when you've cooled down, feel free to ask me or another editor. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 05:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

7254 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-16 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.266363900E09 +++$+++ I thought I'd let you know that I've tagged [[List of Southland episodes]] as a copyvio. ''''' +++$+++ I thought I'd let you know that I've tagged [[List of Southland episodes]] as a copyvio. '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 15:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
7255 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7254 +++$+++ 7254 +++$+++ 2010-02-16 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.266366300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up.  I'd finally given up on trying to stop the constant copyvios, since the show wasn't all that interesting to me.  I did fix the blinding background colors in the table.  BTW, I see your from Sweden.  If you speak any German, it's useful to duplicate your comments to Coral Bay in that language, since she's not an English speaker, and has very poor English reading skills.   +++$+++ : Thanks for the heads up.  I'd finally given up on trying to stop the constant copyvios, since the show wasn't all that interesting to me.  I did fix the blinding background colors in the table.  BTW, I see your from Sweden.  If you speak any German, it's useful to duplicate your comments to Coral Bay in that language, since she's not an English speaker, and has very poor English reading skills.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 16:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
7256 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7254 +++$+++ 7255 +++$+++ 2010-02-16 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.266367200E09 +++$+++ Sorry, my German is very rusty. I do know [[User:MLauba|a guy]] who speaks it though. If Coral Bay continues I'll ask him to translate. Thanks for letting me know. :) ''''' +++$+++ ::Sorry, my German is very rusty. I do know [[User:MLauba|a guy]] who speaks it though. If Coral Bay continues I'll ask him to translate. Thanks for letting me know. :) '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 16:40, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
7257 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7254 +++$+++ 7256 +++$+++ 2010-02-16 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.266367380E09 +++$+++ Rusty is better than I can manage.  I tend to alert anyone closer to Germany than New York City of the language issue in the hope we can eventually get through to Rosie (as Coral Bay used to be known.)  She's got quite a history, including a lifetime ban from the German Wikipedia.  Don't look for a lot of well-crafted edit summaries.   +++$+++ ::: Rusty is better than I can manage.  I tend to alert anyone closer to Germany than New York City of the language issue in the hope we can eventually get through to Rosie (as Coral Bay used to be known.)  She's got quite a history, including a lifetime ban from the German Wikipedia.  Don't look for a lot of well-crafted edit summaries.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 16:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

263353 +++$+++ 83.146.55.85 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-17 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.145260620E09 +++$+++ FYI, I have removed the db tag; you're welcome to AFD it if you insist, but it doesn't fall under speedy in my opinion, and I believe it to certainly be notable enough, he's a local celebrity here in fenland. The user is a separate matter.  +++$+++ FYI, I have removed the db tag; you're welcome to AFD it if you insist, but it doesn't fall under speedy in my opinion, and I believe it to certainly be notable enough, he's a local celebrity here in fenland. The user is a separate matter. [[User:83.146.55.85|83.146.55.85]] 00:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
263354 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263353 +++$+++ 263353 +++$+++ 2006-04-17 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.145303580E09 +++$+++ I'm not the one with multiple accounts named after murderers.  +++$+++ :I'm not the one with multiple accounts named after murderers. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 12:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
263355 +++$+++ 83.146.55.85 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263353 +++$+++ 263354 +++$+++ 2006-04-17 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.145304000E09 +++$+++ If you are accusing me of having anything to do with the Hamish Ross sockpuppetry thing I suggest you retract that accusation, as I am getting very close to reporting you for wiki-stalking and bad faith. And where did this test3 come from?  +++$+++ ::If you are accusing me of having anything to do with the Hamish Ross sockpuppetry thing I suggest you retract that accusation, as I am getting very close to reporting you for wiki-stalking and bad faith. And where did this test3 come from? [[User:83.146.55.85|83.146.55.85]] 13:00, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
263356 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263353 +++$+++ 263355 +++$+++ 2006-04-17 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.145311440E09 +++$+++ Your user contributions. The test3 tag came from [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Adaptation_to_global_warming&diff=prev&oldid=48749450] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Qur%27an&diff=prev&oldid=48758874] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Qur%27an&diff=prev&oldid=48759159]  +++$+++ :::Your user contributions. The test3 tag came from [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adaptation_to_global_warming&diff=prev&oldid=48749450] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Qur%27an&diff=prev&oldid=48758874] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Qur%27an&diff=prev&oldid=48759159] [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 15:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

269401 +++$+++ Sssoul +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-09 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.234198380E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, thank you for your really helpful comments on the [[George Harrison]] article.  trying to resopond to one of your comments, i found that the \"transclusion\" from [[Talk:George_Harrison\/GA2]] to [[Talk:George_Harrison]] seems not to be working right: not all the comments on the \/GA2 page are appearing on the main talk page.  i have no idea what's causing that or how to fix it, but maybe we could simply keep the discussion on the [[Talk:George_Harrison]] page, instead of transcluding it from elsewhere?  it gets very confusing if two different pages need to be checked to carry on a current discussion!  thanks ... i'll ask Dendodge and Silk Tork to have a look at this too  +++$+++ Mattisse, thank you for your really helpful comments on the [[George Harrison]] article.  trying to resopond to one of your comments, i found that the "transclusion" from [[Talk:George_Harrison/GA2]] to [[Talk:George_Harrison]] seems not to be working right: not all the comments on the /GA2 page are appearing on the main talk page.  i have no idea what's causing that or how to fix it, but maybe we could simply keep the discussion on the [[Talk:George_Harrison]] page, instead of transcluding it from elsewhere?  it gets very confusing if two different pages need to be checked to carry on a current discussion!  thanks ... i'll ask Dendodge and Silk Tork to have a look at this too [[User:Sssoul|Sssoul]] ([[User talk:Sssoul|talk]]) 08:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
269402 +++$+++ Sssoul +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269401 +++$+++ 269401 +++$+++ 2009-02-09 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.234211160E09 +++$+++ '''ps:''' sorry, i guess it <u>is<\/u> transcluding, but there's a delay of some kind.  still, wouldn't it be simpler to have the discussion directly on the [[Talk:George_Harrison]] page?  maybe some of the earlier stuff there could be archived if space considerations are important ...  +++$+++ :'''ps:''' sorry, i guess it <u>is</u> transcluding, but there's a delay of some kind.  still, wouldn't it be simpler to have the discussion directly on the [[Talk:George_Harrison]] page?  maybe some of the earlier stuff there could be archived if space considerations are important ... [[User:Sssoul|Sssoul]] ([[User talk:Sssoul|talk]]) 12:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
269403 +++$+++ Dendodge +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269401 +++$+++ 269402 +++$+++ 2009-02-09 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.234211340E09 +++$+++ {{purge|purging}} both pages should fix it, but the lag's definitely getting worse recently (maybe it's related to the 'stick' \"You have new messages\" banners). If there's an abnormally long [[Special:Statistics|job queue]], that could account for it.  +++$+++ ::{{purge|purging}} both pages should fix it, but the lag's definitely getting worse recently (maybe it's related to the 'stick' "You have new messages" banners). If there's an abnormally long [[Special:Statistics|job queue]], that could account for it. [[User: Densock|'''<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:#999FFF">Den</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:Gainsboro">sock</em>''']]|<small>[[User talk:Dendodge|Dendodge]]</small><sup>in public</sup> 12:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

7258 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-18 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.266551520E09 +++$+++ Hey again. I noticed [[List of Castle episodes]] is full of copyvios. You don't happen to know who added them? Regards, ''''' +++$+++ Hey again. I noticed [[List of Castle episodes]] is full of copyvios. You don't happen to know who added them? Regards, '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 19:52, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
7259 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7258 +++$+++ 7258 +++$+++ 2010-02-18 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.266552060E09 +++$+++ I didn't, no.  It's a constant issue.  Rather than tagging it, let's get rid of them.  -- +++$+++ : I didn't, no.  It's a constant issue.  Rather than tagging it, let's get rid of them.  --[[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 20:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
7260 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7258 +++$+++ 7259 +++$+++ 2010-02-18 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.266552540E09 +++$+++ I'm removed everything I could find. The rest seems fine. ''''' +++$+++ ::I'm removed everything I could find. The rest seems fine. '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 20:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
7261 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7258 +++$+++ 7260 +++$+++ 2010-02-18 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.266553260E09 +++$+++ Well done, you!  What an undertaking! -- +++$+++ ::: Well done, you!  What an undertaking! --[[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 20:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

612879 +++$+++ C56C +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612879 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.191899040E09 +++$+++ I responded to your remarks. You falsely said I was \"trolling, and should learn that disruptive editing is not acceptable.\" I think you are confused about who is trolling who[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Richard_Roberts_%28evangelist%29&diff=prev&oldid=163126280][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Oral_Roberts_University&diff=163016039&oldid=163015160]. I've been on wikipedia for more than year, I know what [[WP:DE]], and think you should support or withdrawal your attack against me.  +++$+++ I responded to your remarks. You falsely said I was "trolling, and should learn that disruptive editing is not acceptable." I think you are confused about who is trolling who[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Roberts_%28evangelist%29&diff=prev&oldid=163126280][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oral_Roberts_University&diff=163016039&oldid=163015160]. I've been on wikipedia for more than year, I know what [[WP:DE]], and think you should support or withdrawal your attack against me. [[User:C56C|C56C]] 20:04, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
612880 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612879 +++$+++ 612879 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.191909660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up, I've commented on Gwen's page. ..  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up, I've commented on Gwen's page. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 23:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

269404 +++$+++ GaryColemanFan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-05 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.233906960E09 +++$+++ Thank you for reviewing this article. I was pleasantly surprised to see it reviewed this quickly. It actually caught me a little off-guard, as this week is literally the busiest I've ever had at work. If it's okay with you, I'd like to work on your suggestions this weekend. I've been on Wikipedia a little this week as a distraction, but I won't have time to do anything that requires thought until Saturday, so I thought I should let you know that I am not ignoring your review. I have the information you wanted me to add to the article, so I have every intention of doing that as soon as my schedule and mental capacity permits. I hope this is okay. Thanks again,  +++$+++ Thank you for reviewing this article. I was pleasantly surprised to see it reviewed this quickly. It actually caught me a little off-guard, as this week is literally the busiest I've ever had at work. If it's okay with you, I'd like to work on your suggestions this weekend. I've been on Wikipedia a little this week as a distraction, but I won't have time to do anything that requires thought until Saturday, so I thought I should let you know that I am not ignoring your review. I have the information you wanted me to add to the article, so I have every intention of doing that as soon as my schedule and mental capacity permits. I hope this is okay. Thanks again, [[User:GaryColemanFan|GaryColemanFan]] ([[User talk:GaryColemanFan|talk]]) 23:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
269405 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269404 +++$+++ 269404 +++$+++ 2009-02-06 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.233907320E09 +++$+++ Yes, take your time. As long as I know someone is working on an article, I am not overly concerned with time limits. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes, take your time. As long as I know someone is working on an article, I am not overly concerned with time limits. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
269406 +++$+++ GaryColemanFan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269404 +++$+++ 269405 +++$+++ 2009-02-11 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.234361040E09 +++$+++ Sorry again about the delay. I'll have time in the next couple of days to work on this.  +++$+++ ::Sorry again about the delay. I'll have time in the next couple of days to work on this. [[User:GaryColemanFan|GaryColemanFan]] ([[User talk:GaryColemanFan|talk]]) 06:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

7262 +++$+++ Mkativerata +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-06 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.270608720E09 +++$+++ Hi there - FYI as you got a mention on my talk page :) [[User talk:Mkativerata#DrMargi]]. -- +++$+++ Hi there - FYI as you got a mention on my talk page :) [[User talk:Mkativerata#DrMargi]]. --[[User:Mkativerata|Mkativerata]] ([[User talk:Mkativerata|talk]]) 19:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
7263 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7262 +++$+++ 7262 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.270612620E09 +++$+++ My, but he never gives up, does he?   +++$+++ : My, but he never gives up, does he?  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 20:57, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
7264 +++$+++ Mkativerata +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7262 +++$+++ 7263 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.270612860E09 +++$+++ I must say I am impressed with his persistence! -- +++$+++ :: I must say I am impressed with his persistence! --[[User:Mkativerata|Mkativerata]] ([[User talk:Mkativerata|talk]]) 21:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
7265 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7262 +++$+++ 7264 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.270613700E09 +++$+++ I once asked him, during one of his extended attempts to baffle us with verbiage he'd used over and over, if he knew the definition of insanity.  Clearly, he doesn't.   +++$+++ ::: I once asked him, during one of his extended attempts to baffle us with verbiage he'd used over and over, if he knew the definition of insanity.  Clearly, he doesn't.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 21:15, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

269407 +++$+++ Kieran4 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-09 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.234242840E09 +++$+++ I took care of the issues you listed for the GA Review on the Battle of the Assunpink Creek.- +++$+++ I took care of the issues you listed for the GA Review on the Battle of the Assunpink Creek.-[[User:Kieran4|Kieran4]] ([[User talk:Kieran4|talk]]) 21:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
269408 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269407 +++$+++ 269407 +++$+++ 2009-02-09 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.234243140E09 +++$+++ Great. Thanks, &mdash; +++$+++ :Great. Thanks, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

531552 +++$+++ Ultraexactzz +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-14 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.218763320E09 +++$+++ Since you started the AFD debate, and since no other editors recommended '''Delete''', you can indeed withdraw your nomination. And, since that seemed to be your intent, I went ahead and closed the debate as withdrawn. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Best,  +++$+++ Since you started the AFD debate, and since no other editors recommended '''Delete''', you can indeed withdraw your nomination. And, since that seemed to be your intent, I went ahead and closed the debate as withdrawn. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Best, [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 18:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
531553 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531552 +++$+++ 531552 +++$+++ 2008-08-15 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.218832620E09 +++$+++ Fantastic, thanks for your help. If I'd been the one who added the prod tag ''and'' started the AFD, I'd have just withdrawn the AFD, but I was unsure because there was an implied delete vote from another editor who prodded it. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Fantastic, thanks for your help. If I'd been the one who added the prod tag ''and'' started the AFD, I'd have just withdrawn the AFD, but I was unsure because there was an implied delete vote from another editor who prodded it. Thanks again. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 13:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
531554 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531552 +++$+++ 531552 +++$+++ 2008-08-31 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.220194680E09 +++$+++ I am not the only one who's reverted your nonsense and vandalism. If you have such sources, use them in the article.  +++$+++ :I am not the only one who's reverted your nonsense and vandalism. If you have such sources, use them in the article. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 07:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
531555 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531552 +++$+++ 531552 +++$+++ 2008-08-31 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.220195400E09 +++$+++ Please remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~), which will produce a signature automatically. I couldn't care less about chiropractors; my concern is that you're adding your personal opinions to articles, which violates the [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] and [[WP:V|verifiability]] policies.  +++$+++ :Please remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~), which will produce a signature automatically. I couldn't care less about chiropractors; my concern is that you're adding your personal opinions to articles, which violates the [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] and [[WP:V|verifiability]] policies. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
531556 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531552 +++$+++ 531552 +++$+++ 2008-09-01 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.220262420E09 +++$+++ Hi Craig, I will add a \"welcome\" template to your talk page that will give you some help with editing Wikipedia. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Craig, I will add a "welcome" template to your talk page that will give you some help with editing Wikipedia. Regards, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:47, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

269409 +++$+++ Kieran4 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-10 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.234257480E09 +++$+++ I believe I took care of your concerns for the GA Review on the Battle of [[Long Island]].- +++$+++ I believe I took care of your concerns for the GA Review on the Battle of [[Long Island]].-[[User:Kieran4|Kieran4]] ([[User talk:Kieran4|talk]]) 01:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
269410 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269409 +++$+++ 269409 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.234257720E09 +++$+++ OK, I will check. Thanks, &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, I will check. Thanks, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
269411 +++$+++ Kieran4 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269409 +++$+++ 269410 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.234328580E09 +++$+++ I corrected what you listed.- +++$+++ ::I corrected what you listed.-[[User:Kieran4|Kieran4]] ([[User talk:Kieran4|talk]]) 21:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
269412 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269409 +++$+++ 269411 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.234329180E09 +++$+++ Great! Thanks, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Great! Thanks, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

7266 +++$+++ OracleGuy01 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-13 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.271147700E09 +++$+++ Hi there, I noticed we've both been doing clean up on the [[List of Top Gear episodes]] article to get rid of the rumors people keep adding about series 15. My Wikipedia knowledge isn't that great but does the level of abuse by IP users warrant asking for a semi-protection lock on the page? Is that the right move? I've been editing the talk pages of the offending users warning them to not add unsourced information but that hasn't seemed to help. The same kind of thing happened back before series 14 but the people were not nearly as persistent. I'd appreciate hearing your thoughts on the issue. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi there, I noticed we've both been doing clean up on the [[List of Top Gear episodes]] article to get rid of the rumors people keep adding about series 15. My Wikipedia knowledge isn't that great but does the level of abuse by IP users warrant asking for a semi-protection lock on the page? Is that the right move? I've been editing the talk pages of the offending users warning them to not add unsourced information but that hasn't seemed to help. The same kind of thing happened back before series 14 but the people were not nearly as persistent. I'd appreciate hearing your thoughts on the issue. Thanks, [[User:OracleGuy01|OracleGuy01]] ([[User talk:OracleGuy01|talk]]) 01:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
7267 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7266 +++$+++ 7266 +++$+++ 2010-04-13 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.271151540E09 +++$+++ Let's not go for the hand grenade approach just yet.  It's one IP that's making the vast majority of edits.  Why don't we try a note in his\/her user page and a comment regarding sources on the TG page first?   +++$+++ : Let's not go for the hand grenade approach just yet.  It's one IP that's making the vast majority of edits.  Why don't we try a note in his/her user page and a comment regarding sources on the TG page first?  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 02:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
7268 +++$+++ OracleGuy01 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7266 +++$+++ 7267 +++$+++ 2010-04-13 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.271161800E09 +++$+++ Alright. I've added a note on their talk page, hopefully it will help.  +++$+++ :: Alright. I've added a note on their talk page, hopefully it will help. [[User:OracleGuy01|OracleGuy01]] ([[User talk:OracleGuy01|talk]]) 05:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
7269 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7266 +++$+++ 7268 +++$+++ 2010-04-13 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.271162640E09 +++$+++ Fingers crossed.  And if it doesn't, you've done your due diligence and can justify lowering the boom.   +++$+++ ::: Fingers crossed.  And if it doesn't, you've done your due diligence and can justify lowering the boom.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 05:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

43887 +++$+++ Ebanony +++$+++ Cmguy777 +++$+++ 43887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-19 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.284892620E09 +++$+++ I did that to give you a chance to address the 10 obvious examples in this article ''alone'' I'm pretty sure you made. I'm reiterating what 4 or 5 other editors have told you: copyright is not allowed. Remove the copyright problems you cut and pasted from Mt Vernon and other sites. You copied verbatim text in many places. About half the paragraphs in that article have this problem.  +++$+++ I did that to give you a chance to address the 10 obvious examples in this article ''alone'' I'm pretty sure you made. I'm reiterating what 4 or 5 other editors have told you: copyright is not allowed. Remove the copyright problems you cut and pasted from Mt Vernon and other sites. You copied verbatim text in many places. About half the paragraphs in that article have this problem. [[User:Ebanony|Ebanony]] ([[User talk:Ebanony|talk]]) 03:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
43888 +++$+++ Ebanony +++$+++ Cmguy777 +++$+++ 43887 +++$+++ 43887 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.284971760E09 +++$+++ The article Jefferson and slavery has more than 20 different places with verbatim copy and paste from the sources, including your timelines, introduction, views on slavery, Revolutionary period, Gr\xe9goire's book, African American enslavement etc - literally half or more of the artocle has this problem (just like the Washington article). Please remove the violations. I gave you several warnings on the Washington and slavery page; you ignored them.  +++$+++ :The article Jefferson and slavery has more than 20 different places with verbatim copy and paste from the sources, including your timelines, introduction, views on slavery, Revolutionary period, Grégoire's book, African American enslavement etc - literally half or more of the artocle has this problem (just like the Washington article). Please remove the violations. I gave you several warnings on the Washington and slavery page; you ignored them. [[User:Ebanony|Ebanony]] ([[User talk:Ebanony|talk]]) 01:36, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
43889 +++$+++ Ebanony +++$+++ Cmguy777 +++$+++ 43887 +++$+++ 43888 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.284976200E09 +++$+++ I've posted an example of the copyright problem for you to see. I think this is your edit on 30 September 2009, but I'mnot certain. I suggest you remove the offending text from the article's main page of the Jefferson and slavery article, as well as the others I warned you about here (you deleted my earlier messages). Some of the other edits I know you did.  +++$+++ :: I've posted an example of the copyright problem for you to see. I think this is your edit on 30 September 2009, but I'mnot certain. I suggest you remove the offending text from the article's main page of the Jefferson and slavery article, as well as the others I warned you about here (you deleted my earlier messages). Some of the other edits I know you did. [[User:Ebanony|Ebanony]] ([[User talk:Ebanony|talk]]) 02:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

269413 +++$+++ Cavie78 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-10 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.234313100E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, sorry to bother you - was wondering if, as an experienced reviewer, you could give me a second opinion on an issue I have with the album article ''[[The Return of Dr. Octagon]]'' that I'm currently reviewing for GA status. I feel that the split between 'Origins and recording' and 'Music: Production' is a bit arbitrary and doesn't read that well but the editor disagrees. I'm thinking about letting the issue slide but the phrase 'GA should not be FA lite' keeps coming to mind and I'd appreciate your input. Thanks  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, sorry to bother you - was wondering if, as an experienced reviewer, you could give me a second opinion on an issue I have with the album article ''[[The Return of Dr. Octagon]]'' that I'm currently reviewing for GA status. I feel that the split between 'Origins and recording' and 'Music: Production' is a bit arbitrary and doesn't read that well but the editor disagrees. I'm thinking about letting the issue slide but the phrase 'GA should not be FA lite' keeps coming to mind and I'd appreciate your input. Thanks [[User:Cavie78|Cavie78]] ([[User talk:Cavie78|talk]]) 16:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
269414 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269413 +++$+++ 269413 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.234314900E09 +++$+++ I have passed a couple recently when I had reservations, letting a issue or two slide, as you are considering. Personally, I think I would not do it again. If I felt the issue was important, and I think confused chronology and section headings is important, then I would fail the article and let the editor take it to GAR or renominate it. &mdash; +++$+++ :I have passed a couple recently when I had reservations, letting a issue or two slide, as you are considering. Personally, I think I would not do it again. If I felt the issue was important, and I think confused chronology and section headings is important, then I would fail the article and let the editor take it to GAR or renominate it. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

7270 +++$+++ Pipedreamz +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-18 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.271642940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Pipedreamz|Pipedreamz]] 19:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
7271 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7270 +++$+++ 7270 +++$+++ 2010-04-18 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.271643600E09 +++$+++ The problem with the casting stuff I removed was that it was only a few words different than the original press release, and thereby a [[WP:COPY|copyright violation]].  How much editing you've done has no bearing, and a comment like yours will be viewed by some as [[WP:OWN|ownership]] of the article.  That it's factual and sourced doesn't necessarily make an edit [[WP:NOTE|notable]], and I felt that, aside from the larger copyright violation, that undue attention was given to the casting change.  It certainly could be re-added in a more concise form.   +++$+++ : The problem with the casting stuff I removed was that it was only a few words different than the original press release, and thereby a [[WP:COPY|copyright violation]].  How much editing you've done has no bearing, and a comment like yours will be viewed by some as [[WP:OWN|ownership]] of the article.  That it's factual and sourced doesn't necessarily make an edit [[WP:NOTE|notable]], and I felt that, aside from the larger copyright violation, that undue attention was given to the casting change.  It certainly could be re-added in a more concise form.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 19:20, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

531559 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-03 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.220433960E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/henrietta.liswa.wa.gov.au\/search\/X?SEARCH=barbagallo&searchscope=1&Da=&Db=&p=&SORT=D is one way to start - not easy but  +++$+++ http://henrietta.liswa.wa.gov.au/search/X?SEARCH=barbagallo&searchscope=1&Da=&Db=&p=&SORT=D is one way to start - not easy but [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 02:26, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
531560 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531559 +++$+++ 531559 +++$+++ 2008-09-03 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.220434500E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I will check it out. I'm now working on Telfer's article... anything to avoid uni work, I guess! :)  +++$+++ :Thanks, I will check it out. I'm now working on Telfer's article... anything to avoid uni work, I guess! :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
531561 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531559 +++$+++ 531560 +++$+++ 2008-09-03 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.220434560E09 +++$+++ Ahh therein lies something that I indeed can relate to :|  +++$+++ ::Ahh therein lies something that I indeed can relate to :| [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 02:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

7272 +++$+++ Knownalias +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-02 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.272836880E09 +++$+++ Actually, the Futon Critic does provide estimated dates, and refer to them as '''projected''' dates.  Right now for \"In Plain Sight\", those dates are in July for the 7th, 14th, 21st & 28th.  The editor that provided those TBA dates didn't provide the July dates, but rather only provided the confirmed dates of June 2nd, 9th, 16th and 23rd, which are marked \"N\/A\" because (as I'm sure you know) the title is not yet available.  But they know that an episode ''will'' air on that date.  I've yet to see any deviation from this pattern (changes to schedules like this invariably happen to the projected dates), which is why I backed this editor up with the cite.  Especially for a cable show like on FX or USA, which doesn't repeat shows throught the \"season\" but rather throughout the week, running episodes straight through to the end, unless they bow out early and show the last few episodes later, like in the winter (like maybe those last four projected episdodes not yet officially on the schedule?)  If you look at the Futon Critic schedule, you'll even note the lack of June 30th.  No show scheduled.  They know that ''now''.  The same thing happened with \"White Collar\" and their winter return, which showed a gap on Feb 16 as early as December (turned out to be the Westminister dog show.  They ''knew''.)  The use of these \"N\/A\" dates is a standard practice for a great number of editors on a great number of pages, even for network shows who ''do'' fall victim to repeats, Presidential addresses and hurricane relief telethons.  How can it not be acceptable here, where the schedule only exsists to interrupt their constant run of Bourne Identity movies and NCIS reruns?  They ''know''.  +++$+++ Actually, the Futon Critic does provide estimated dates, and refer to them as '''projected''' dates.  Right now for "In Plain Sight", those dates are in July for the 7th, 14th, 21st & 28th.  The editor that provided those TBA dates didn't provide the July dates, but rather only provided the confirmed dates of June 2nd, 9th, 16th and 23rd, which are marked "N/A" because (as I'm sure you know) the title is not yet available.  But they know that an episode ''will'' air on that date.  I've yet to see any deviation from this pattern (changes to schedules like this invariably happen to the projected dates), which is why I backed this editor up with the cite.  Especially for a cable show like on FX or USA, which doesn't repeat shows throught the "season" but rather throughout the week, running episodes straight through to the end, unless they bow out early and show the last few episodes later, like in the winter (like maybe those last four projected episdodes not yet officially on the schedule?)  If you look at the Futon Critic schedule, you'll even note the lack of June 30th.  No show scheduled.  They know that ''now''.  The same thing happened with "White Collar" and their winter return, which showed a gap on Feb 16 as early as December (turned out to be the Westminister dog show.  They ''knew''.)  The use of these "N/A" dates is a standard practice for a great number of editors on a great number of pages, even for network shows who ''do'' fall victim to repeats, Presidential addresses and hurricane relief telethons.  How can it not be acceptable here, where the schedule only exsists to interrupt their constant run of Bourne Identity movies and NCIS reruns?  They ''know''. [[User:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Kristen ITC"; color:#23297A'>KnownAlias</span>]] [[user talk:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Segoe script"; color:#614051'><small> contact</small></span>]] 14:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
7273 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7272 +++$+++ 7272 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.272842400E09 +++$+++ I could strongly encourage you to be careful about lecturing editors as experienced as I am about the basics until you know there's a need to.  You assume I am unaware of a number of basic practices I know well, simply by reading far too  much into a simple edit.  I would also caution you against over-reliance on Futon Critic as a source; it's a good one in the short-term, but as dates and titles get longer term, it becomes increasingly less so, and not just because it projects dates and episode titles.  History suggests it doesn't know as much as you contend it does.   +++$+++ :  I could strongly encourage you to be careful about lecturing editors as experienced as I am about the basics until you know there's a need to.  You assume I am unaware of a number of basic practices I know well, simply by reading far too  much into a simple edit.  I would also caution you against over-reliance on Futon Critic as a source; it's a good one in the short-term, but as dates and titles get longer term, it becomes increasingly less so, and not just because it projects dates and episode titles.  History suggests it doesn't know as much as you contend it does.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 16:20, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
7274 +++$+++ Knownalias +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7272 +++$+++ 7273 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.272847740E09 +++$+++ Truth is, I'm a truck driver.  My entire participation is only to keep ''my'' info straight so I can manage my Tivo at home, and watch my shows on DVD on the road to kill my down time.  I keep a chart on my Excell projecting when new episodes will air (I only need titles to weed out the repeats during schedule changes), and the cable network projections have yet to need adjusting. It's worked for me so far.   +++$+++ ::Truth is, I'm a truck driver.  My entire participation is only to keep ''my'' info straight so I can manage my Tivo at home, and watch my shows on DVD on the road to kill my down time.  I keep a chart on my Excell projecting when new episodes will air (I only need titles to weed out the repeats during schedule changes), and the cable network projections have yet to need adjusting. It's worked for me so far.  [[User:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Kristen ITC"; color:#23297A'>KnownAlias</span>]] [[user talk:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Segoe script"; color:#614051'><small> contact</small></span>]] 17:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

269418 +++$+++ Peregrine_Fisher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-11 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.234354980E09 +++$+++ I don't know if you liked reviewing [[Tomb of Horrors]] ([[Talk:Tomb of Horrors\/GA1|review)]] but I've got three more just like it.  [[White Plume Mountain]], [[Expedition to the Barrier Peaks]], and [[The Lost Caverns of Tsojcanth]].  They are all part of a four part series.  If you're trying to mix it up, I totally understand, and don't worry about it.  I just like your reviews: they're easy on me and really help the articles.  Also, it's kind of you're fault. ;-)  Your review at [[Talk:Dwellers of the Forbidden City\/GA1]], which suggested finding more sources, led me to a lot of what I sourced those three articles with. -  +++$+++ I don't know if you liked reviewing [[Tomb of Horrors]] ([[Talk:Tomb of Horrors/GA1|review)]] but I've got three more just like it.  [[White Plume Mountain]], [[Expedition to the Barrier Peaks]], and [[The Lost Caverns of Tsojcanth]].  They are all part of a four part series.  If you're trying to mix it up, I totally understand, and don't worry about it.  I just like your reviews: they're easy on me and really help the articles.  Also, it's kind of you're fault. ;-)  Your review at [[Talk:Dwellers of the Forbidden City/GA1]], which suggested finding more sources, led me to a lot of what I sourced those three articles with. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 04:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
269419 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 2009-02-11 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.234356120E09 +++$+++ I'll consider it. I don't consider myself any kind of expert on Dungeons & Dragons. Plus, since you are tending to go on to FAC, I feel like I owe you to do a good, thorough job!  &mdash; +++$+++ :I'll consider it. I don't consider myself any kind of expert on Dungeons & Dragons. Plus, since you are tending to go on to FAC, I feel like I owe you to do a good, thorough job!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
269420 +++$+++ Peregrine_Fisher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269419 +++$+++ 2009-02-11 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.234356480E09 +++$+++ That's cool.  Just so you know, I'm not going anywhere near FAC anytime soon, if I can help it.  It's quite painfull, although I learned more in the week of my one FAC than probably anyting else.  In general I expect all GA reviews to thorough, though (just speaking in general, not about you), so that part I totally understand. -  +++$+++ ::That's cool.  Just so you know, I'm not going anywhere near FAC anytime soon, if I can help it.  It's quite painfull, although I learned more in the week of my one FAC than probably anyting else.  In general I expect all GA reviews to thorough, though (just speaking in general, not about you), so that part I totally understand. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 04:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
269421 +++$+++ Peregrine_Fisher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269420 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.234428720E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for the review.  I think I've addressed your comments. -  +++$+++ :::Thanks again for the review.  I think I've addressed your comments. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 00:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269422 +++$+++ Peregrine_Fisher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269421 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.234435920E09 +++$+++ Hopefully I got it this time. -  +++$+++ ::::Hopefully I got it this time. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 02:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269423 +++$+++ Peregrine_Fisher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269422 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.234510020E09 +++$+++ Anything else I can work on with [[White Plume Mountain]]? -  +++$+++ :::::Anything else I can work on with [[White Plume Mountain]]? - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 23:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269424 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269423 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.234510320E09 +++$+++ You said the cover art was not really attributed to [[Jeff Dee]]? Because if it is, you could credit him, as the [[Spider-Man]] article does. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::You said the cover art was not really attributed to [[Jeff Dee]]? Because if it is, you could credit him, as the [[Spider-Man]] article does. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269425 +++$+++ Peregrine_Fisher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269424 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.234510620E09 +++$+++ It's taken care of, now.  I forgot to mention that on GA1. -  +++$+++ :::::::It's taken care of, now.  I forgot to mention that on GA1. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 23:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269426 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269425 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.234511220E09 +++$+++ So he is not responsible for the cover that is shown in the article? The red one?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::So he is not responsible for the cover that is shown in the article? The red one?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269427 +++$+++ Peregrine_Fisher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269426 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.234511940E09 +++$+++ Are you seeing the old version of [[:File:S2 White Plume Mountain.jpg]]?  It should be orange. -  +++$+++ :::::::::Are you seeing the old version of [[:File:S2 White Plume Mountain.jpg]]?  It should be orange. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 23:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269428 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269427 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.234512180E09 +++$+++ I don't know. It is red or orange. [[:File:S2 White Plume Mountain.jpg]]. Is that the one by [[Jeff Dee]]?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::I don't know. It is red or orange. [[:File:S2 White Plume Mountain.jpg]]. Is that the one by [[Jeff Dee]]?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
269429 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269428 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.234512480E09 +++$+++ Yep. If you look in the file history, you'll see an older cover; I don't know who was the artist for the original beige cover.  +++$+++ :::::::::::Yep. If you look in the file history, you'll see an older cover; I don't know who was the artist for the original beige cover. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 00:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
269430 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269429 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.234512720E09 +++$+++ Is there a reason why you don't give him credit in the pix caption like [[Spider-Man]] does for its cover art? Looks classy.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::::Is there a reason why you don't give him credit in the pix caption like [[Spider-Man]] does for its cover art? Looks classy.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:12, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
269431 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269430 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.234513560E09 +++$+++ Actually, I just fixed it, although the caption format might need a tweak. I think most of the D&D module infoboxes were missing the caption line, so I just copied it from [[Ravenloft (module)]] which is at FAC.  +++$+++ :::::::::::::Actually, I just fixed it, although the caption format might need a tweak. I think most of the D&D module infoboxes were missing the caption line, so I just copied it from [[Ravenloft (module)]] which is at FAC. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 00:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
269432 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269418 +++$+++ 269431 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.234513680E09 +++$+++ Great, I like it.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::::::Great, I like it.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

7275 +++$+++ AussieLegend +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-29 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.275157080E09 +++$+++ I've been over [[List of In Plain Sight episodes]] and the three season articles and given them a good cleanup. I've removed the succession boxes as they aren't needed (the same functionality is included in {{tl|Infobox television season}}), added general refs, reorganised the tables so all fields are in the correct order, fixed a few errors and so on. One thing I find really peculiar is the table on the list article. Guest star information should be in the season articles but they contained only partial information so I've merged the rest from the table to the season articles. [[List of In Plain Sight episodes]] now provides little to no additional information to what's in the season articles. That said, other than cast information, the season articles don't provide anything of substance over what the episode tables provide. There's really no need for separate articles at this time. A combined article is only 36kB, well below the threshold for splitting.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:AussieLegend\/Project_03&oldid=364826578] -- +++$+++ I've been over [[List of In Plain Sight episodes]] and the three season articles and given them a good cleanup. I've removed the succession boxes as they aren't needed (the same functionality is included in {{tl|Infobox television season}}), added general refs, reorganised the tables so all fields are in the correct order, fixed a few errors and so on. One thing I find really peculiar is the table on the list article. Guest star information should be in the season articles but they contained only partial information so I've merged the rest from the table to the season articles. [[List of In Plain Sight episodes]] now provides little to no additional information to what's in the season articles. That said, other than cast information, the season articles don't provide anything of substance over what the episode tables provide. There's really no need for separate articles at this time. A combined article is only 36kB, well below the threshold for splitting.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:AussieLegend/Project_03&oldid=364826578] --[[User:AussieLegend|AussieLegend]] ([[User talk:AussieLegend|talk]]) 11:18, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
7276 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7275 +++$+++ 7275 +++$+++ 2010-05-29 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.275180960E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  I started the discussion regarding reverting to one [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:List_of_In_Plain_Sight_episodes#Restoration_of_original_lists_article one article] on the IPS talk page.  I couldn't remember the word merge (annoying) for a while, now fixed, but I think the point is made.  +++$+++ : Thanks!  I started the discussion regarding reverting to one [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_In_Plain_Sight_episodes#Restoration_of_original_lists_article one article] on the IPS talk page.  I couldn't remember the word merge (annoying) for a while, now fixed, but I think the point is made. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 17:56, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
7277 +++$+++ AussieLegend +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7275 +++$+++ 7276 +++$+++ 2010-05-29 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.275200400E09 +++$+++ I'll comment further there. -- +++$+++ ::I'll comment further there. --[[User:AussieLegend|AussieLegend]] ([[User talk:AussieLegend|talk]]) 23:20, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
7278 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7275 +++$+++ 7277 +++$+++ 2010-05-30 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.275203520E09 +++$+++ Great - and thanks for fixing the url.  +++$+++ ::: Great - and thanks for fixing the url. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 00:12, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
7279 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7275 +++$+++ 7275 +++$+++ 2010-05-30 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.275215040E09 +++$+++ That's the risk you run, and something we've all had happen.  Nothing condescending about my attitude, just my rationale for the edits I made.  You might want to read up on what recurring characters on TV are.  +++$+++ : That's the risk you run, and something we've all had happen.  Nothing condescending about my attitude, just my rationale for the edits I made.  You might want to read up on what recurring characters on TV are. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 03:24, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

611275 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-25 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.293286920E09 +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes-->  +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 06:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
611276 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611275 +++$+++ 611275 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 06:38:00 +++$+++ 1.293287880E09 +++$+++ That page in turn was taken from [http:\/\/www.af.mil\/information\/bios\/bio.asp?bioID=6955 here].  +++$+++ :That page in turn was taken from [http://www.af.mil/information/bios/bio.asp?bioID=6955 here]. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 06:38, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
611277 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611275 +++$+++ 611275 +++$+++ 2010-12-26 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.293376860E09 +++$+++ Do you have a source that states that the books are widely popular? The problem with such statement is that I cannot fact check that statement. Also, just because a book sells doesn't necessarily make it popular. You should also find more sources to back it up. For now I am going to decline it but that doesn't mean that you can't re-submit it later on.  +++$+++ :Do you have a source that states that the books are widely popular? The problem with such statement is that I cannot fact check that statement. Also, just because a book sells doesn't necessarily make it popular. You should also find more sources to back it up. For now I am going to decline it but that doesn't mean that you can't re-submit it later on. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 07:21, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

531567 +++$+++ Stijndon +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531567 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-04 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.220545320E09 +++$+++ Hi, I removed your CsD and just added \"weasel\" at the top, and some \"fact?\" tags throughout the text. I guess the article is notable enough when properly sourced. (That is: if everything he claims can actually be verified) Hope you agree!  +++$+++ Hi, I removed your CsD and just added "weasel" at the top, and some "fact?" tags throughout the text. I guess the article is notable enough when properly sourced. (That is: if everything he claims can actually be verified) Hope you agree! [[User:Stijndon|Stijndon]] ([[User talk:Stijndon|talk]]) 09:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
531568 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531567 +++$+++ 531567 +++$+++ 2008-09-04 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.220546520E09 +++$+++ Hi Stijndon, the CSD tag was not for notability, it was because [[Stefan Pasborg|the article]]'s a direct copy from here: http:\/\/www.pasborg.dk\/pasborg_biography.doc  +++$+++ :Hi Stijndon, the CSD tag was not for notability, it was because [[Stefan Pasborg|the article]]'s a direct copy from here: http://www.pasborg.dk/pasborg_biography.doc [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 09:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

7280 +++$+++ AussieLegend +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-02 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.275487080E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AList_of_In_Plain_Sight_episodes&action=historysubmit&diff=365583540&oldid=365565328 This suggestion] was spot on. -- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AList_of_In_Plain_Sight_episodes&action=historysubmit&diff=365583540&oldid=365565328 This suggestion] was spot on. --[[User:AussieLegend|AussieLegend]] ([[User talk:AussieLegend|talk]]) 06:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
7281 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7280 +++$+++ 7280 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.275505980E09 +++$+++ Great!  I think it's time to start a little campaign to fix a few of these.  Burn Notice is OK, although the articles are loaded with fancruft to my mind, but White Collar is another example of jumping this particular gun.  Are you up for it?  +++$+++ : Great!  I think it's time to start a little campaign to fix a few of these.  Burn Notice is OK, although the articles are loaded with fancruft to my mind, but White Collar is another example of jumping this particular gun.  Are you up for it? [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 12:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
7282 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7280 +++$+++ 7280 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.275507420E09 +++$+++ Let the discussion begin!  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_White_Collar_episodes&action=edit&section=3]  +++$+++ : Let the discussion begin!  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_White_Collar_episodes&action=edit&section=3] [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 12:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
7283 +++$+++ AussieLegend +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7280 +++$+++ 7282 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.275507720E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Burn_Notice_(season_1)&action=historysubmit&diff=365627079&oldid=365593212 This edit] is a good example of why articles shouldn't be split unnecessarily and then duplicated. Obviously somebody had updated the main list, but not the season. -- +++$+++ :: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Burn_Notice_(season_1)&action=historysubmit&diff=365627079&oldid=365593212 This edit] is a good example of why articles shouldn't be split unnecessarily and then duplicated. Obviously somebody had updated the main list, but not the season. --[[User:AussieLegend|AussieLegend]] ([[User talk:AussieLegend|talk]]) 12:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
7284 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7280 +++$+++ 7283 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.275508440E09 +++$+++ I started the discussion on the White Collar episode list page.   +++$+++ ::: I started the discussion on the White Collar episode list page.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 12:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

531569 +++$+++ delldot +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531569 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-05 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.220608920E09 +++$+++ Hey, sorry you never got a response to your [[WP:RFF|request for feedback]]{{#if:Sindy|&nbsp;on [[:Sindy]]}}.  Did you still have any questions about it?  If so you can always ask me on my talk page (about that article or any other), I'm always glad to try and help out. I'm going to go ahead and tag the section resolved, but definitely let me know if you need anything, or feel free to file another request.  Peace,  +++$+++ Hey, sorry you never got a response to your [[WP:RFF|request for feedback]]{{#if:Sindy|&nbsp;on [[:Sindy]]}}.  Did you still have any questions about it?  If so you can always ask me on my talk page (about that article or any other), I'm always glad to try and help out. I'm going to go ahead and tag the section resolved, but definitely let me know if you need anything, or feel free to file another request.  Peace, [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small> 03:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
531570 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531569 +++$+++ 531569 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.220609400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for following up. The article's since been made a Good Article and gone to Peer Review, so I don't need any more feedback at this time. I think Request for Feedback should be scrapped - not enough response, and it's not clear enough what it's there for, hence why a lot of editors are posting random stuff like the entire contents of new articles. Thanks anyway!  +++$+++ :Thanks for following up. The article's since been made a Good Article and gone to Peer Review, so I don't need any more feedback at this time. I think Request for Feedback should be scrapped - not enough response, and it's not clear enough what it's there for, hence why a lot of editors are posting random stuff like the entire contents of new articles. Thanks anyway! [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
531571 +++$+++ delldot +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531569 +++$+++ 531570 +++$+++ 2008-09-06 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.220699640E09 +++$+++ Great work on Sindy!  I can certainly see why you'd think it should be scrapped given the response you got.  It seems like it gets few enough requests that a couple dedicated people could keep it under control.  I might start helping out there, and others are taking interest too, so hopefully it'll pick up.  Peace,  +++$+++ ::Great work on Sindy!  I can certainly see why you'd think it should be scrapped given the response you got.  It seems like it gets few enough requests that a couple dedicated people could keep it under control.  I might start helping out there, and others are taking interest too, so hopefully it'll pick up.  Peace, [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small> 04:14, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

576359 +++$+++ PouponOnToast +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576359 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-12 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.202836200E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your support, MONGO, but I'm walking away from this one. Keep your powder dry.  +++$+++ Thank you for your support, MONGO, but I'm walking away from this one. Keep your powder dry. [[User:PouponOnToast|PouponOnToast]] ([[User talk:PouponOnToast|talk]]) 09:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
576360 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576359 +++$+++ 576359 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.202837400E09 +++$+++ He's had recent disputes with you...a neutral admin should have been requested.-- +++$+++ :He's had recent disputes with you...a neutral admin should have been requested.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 09:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
576361 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576359 +++$+++ 576360 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.202837640E09 +++$+++ what dispute would that be MONGO? I havent crossed paths with Poupon on any matter except the RFCU\/Samiharris one and as far as I know there has never been a comment exchanged between us. You keep repeating the \"recent disputes mantra\" as if repeating it will magically make it true. A difference of opinion on an issue in which i am only tangently involved is hardly a recent dispute MONGO.  +++$+++ ::what dispute would that be MONGO? I havent crossed paths with Poupon on any matter except the RFCU/Samiharris one and as far as I know there has never been a comment exchanged between us. You keep repeating the "recent disputes mantra" as if repeating it will magically make it true. A difference of opinion on an issue in which i am only tangently involved is hardly a recent dispute MONGO. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 09:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
576362 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576359 +++$+++ 576361 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.202838600E09 +++$+++ Okay....and I'm sure you're in agreement on the subject matter? Have you seen [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=nsVx09Jzvhg this]?-- +++$+++ :::Okay....and I'm sure you're in agreement on the subject matter? Have you seen [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsVx09Jzvhg this]?--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 09:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
576363 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576359 +++$+++ 576362 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.202841000E09 +++$+++ Who the hell cares whether we agree or not? There has been no dispute. Stop continually lying about this now.  +++$+++ ::::Who the hell cares whether we agree or not? There has been no dispute. Stop continually lying about this now. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 10:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
576364 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576359 +++$+++ 576363 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.202841360E09 +++$+++ Facts are, you are on the opposite side of a conflict issue...you should have asked a neutral admin to examine the situation. Please don't say I am lying...it is not appreciated and is a violation of our [[WP:CIVIL|civility]] guidelines.-- +++$+++ :::::Facts are, you are on the opposite side of a conflict issue...you should have asked a neutral admin to examine the situation. Please don't say I am lying...it is not appreciated and is a violation of our [[WP:CIVIL|civility]] guidelines.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 10:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
576365 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576359 +++$+++ 576364 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.202841780E09 +++$+++ NO it is a lie, and one which you repeat often. Being that I was not one of the people involved in teh dispute, I am not a party to it - and neither for that matter is Poupon. Being aware of a dispute and holding an opinion about it does not make me a participant in it. This is the second time in recent  times you have accused me of being in a dispute when I am not, and judging by the last time you tried to pull this one, I am not the only one who thinks you are talking through your hat.  +++$+++ ::::::NO it is a lie, and one which you repeat often. Being that I was not one of the people involved in teh dispute, I am not a party to it - and neither for that matter is Poupon. Being aware of a dispute and holding an opinion about it does not make me a participant in it. This is the second time in recent  times you have accused me of being in a dispute when I am not, and judging by the last time you tried to pull this one, I am not the only one who thinks you are talking through your hat. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 10:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
576366 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576359 +++$+++ 576365 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.202842620E09 +++$+++ Viridae...please calm down. My observation is that you are on the opposite side of a dispute then that which PouponOnToast is...you should have asked for a neutral admin to perform that block....it is simple to do such an action, and having an itchy trigger finger is unbecoming an admin. There are lots of real trolls out there for you to go and block.-- +++$+++ :::::::Viridae...please calm down. My observation is that you are on the opposite side of a dispute then that which PouponOnToast is...you should have asked for a neutral admin to perform that block....it is simple to do such an action, and having an itchy trigger finger is unbecoming an admin. There are lots of real trolls out there for you to go and block.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 10:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
576367 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576359 +++$+++ 576366 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.202844060E09 +++$+++ Hardly an itchy trigger finger MONGO, just as I was not in a dispute. Poupon has been uncivil about this matter across multiple pages for days on end - something I had noticed but until today did not reach the level where enough was enough. He got a civility warning for his language on Durova's talk page, and then proceeded to troll the RfC. That is hardly an itchy trigger finger - the block was performormed in full knowledge of Jimbo's recent example that incivility cannot be tolerated. Furthermore, under your \"interperatation\" of a dispute it would be nigh on impossible to find someone neutral because all they have to do is hold an opinion - something that has been pointed out to you on more than one occasion by people other than myself. Hell even arbitrators follow disputes before they reach RfAr. Now how about you see sense and stop screamigng admin abuse every single time i make a block you disagree with?  +++$+++ ::::::::Hardly an itchy trigger finger MONGO, just as I was not in a dispute. Poupon has been uncivil about this matter across multiple pages for days on end - something I had noticed but until today did not reach the level where enough was enough. He got a civility warning for his language on Durova's talk page, and then proceeded to troll the RfC. That is hardly an itchy trigger finger - the block was performormed in full knowledge of Jimbo's recent example that incivility cannot be tolerated. Furthermore, under your "interperatation" of a dispute it would be nigh on impossible to find someone neutral because all they have to do is hold an opinion - something that has been pointed out to you on more than one occasion by people other than myself. Hell even arbitrators follow disputes before they reach RfAr. Now how about you see sense and stop screamigng admin abuse every single time i make a block you disagree with? [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 11:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
576368 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576359 +++$+++ 576367 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.202868420E09 +++$+++ You crossed the line on that block, as you done a lot of times lately. You've protected pages you shouldn't have, you've been aiding banned editors, you've been highly incivil at times, like here, calling me a liar, and recently where you told me to put up or shut up...it's amusing watching you scream about others being less then perfect when you yourself are behaving so miserably.-- +++$+++ :::::::::You crossed the line on that block, as you done a lot of times lately. You've protected pages you shouldn't have, you've been aiding banned editors, you've been highly incivil at times, like here, calling me a liar, and recently where you told me to put up or shut up...it's amusing watching you scream about others being less then perfect when you yourself are behaving so miserably.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 18:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
576369 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576359 +++$+++ 576368 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.202881380E09 +++$+++ Yeah pull the other one MONGO, it plays a tune. The protections have been endorsed every time I have performed one - you are the only person who has a problem with them. Aiding banned editors? Yeah go on - I would like to see that one stand up. Incivil calling yu a liar? You ARE lying, whil that may not be the most civil i have been that is hardly anything like your horrific track record. So once again MONGO, either put up or shut up. +++$+++ ::::::::::Yeah pull the other one MONGO, it plays a tune. The protections have been endorsed every time I have performed one - you are the only person who has a problem with them. Aiding banned editors? Yeah go on - I would like to see that one stand up. Incivil calling yu a liar? You ARE lying, whil that may not be the most civil i have been that is hardly anything like your horrific track record. So once again MONGO, either put up or shut up.[[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 21:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

531572 +++$+++ Adam.J.W.C. +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531572 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-05 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.220609040E09 +++$+++ I cant see why the link to the portal had to be removed from every single article that it was in. Why would it be irrelavent in the city of Bankstown article or the bankstown article. All the articles were related to the city of Bankstown. I believe admin who removed all those links has a grudge against me because he had me blocked once and is doing this to annoy. If the links should be at the bottom of the page then why were they not removed there. Shouldn't they have waited until the portal was deleted. Also why would they be calling it spam when all I am trying to do is contribute to wikipedia and trying to help build on topics about Bankstown and link them up. I think some of the admins on this site a bit narrow minded in some cases. This seems a bit like victimization  +++$+++ I cant see why the link to the portal had to be removed from every single article that it was in. Why would it be irrelavent in the city of Bankstown article or the bankstown article. All the articles were related to the city of Bankstown. I believe admin who removed all those links has a grudge against me because he had me blocked once and is doing this to annoy. If the links should be at the bottom of the page then why were they not removed there. Shouldn't they have waited until the portal was deleted. Also why would they be calling it spam when all I am trying to do is contribute to wikipedia and trying to help build on topics about Bankstown and link them up. I think some of the admins on this site a bit narrow minded in some cases. This seems a bit like victimization [[User:Adam.J.W.C.|Adam]] ([[User talk:Adam.J.W.C.|talk]]) 03:04, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
531573 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531572 +++$+++ 531572 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.220609400E09 +++$+++ I didn't say it was irrelevant to either of those articles. I just think it should be considered before being inserted automatically into every article that mentions the City of Bankstown as part of a template, and it certainly shouldn't be linked to ''instead of'' the City of Bankstown article at the top of the template. I can't comment on the actions of anyone else or whether the portal will or should be deleted. I respect your work on the portal (I've done a lot of work at [[P:WA|the WA portal]]), and think you should have your say at the Australian noticeboard (there's a link on your talk page).  +++$+++ :I didn't say it was irrelevant to either of those articles. I just think it should be considered before being inserted automatically into every article that mentions the City of Bankstown as part of a template, and it certainly shouldn't be linked to ''instead of'' the City of Bankstown article at the top of the template. I can't comment on the actions of anyone else or whether the portal will or should be deleted. I respect your work on the portal (I've done a lot of work at [[P:WA|the WA portal]]), and think you should have your say at the Australian noticeboard (there's a link on your talk page). [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
531574 +++$+++ Adam.J.W.C. +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531572 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.220609640E09 +++$+++ The reason I didn't comment on the notice board is because I wasn't actually worried about this being deleted. Also I have come across other temps with the commens media link and portal link in them and no one complains about these. I think its a good idea to save a few edits  +++$+++ :::The reason I didn't comment on the notice board is because I wasn't actually worried about this being deleted. Also I have come across other temps with the commens media link and portal link in them and no one complains about these. I think its a good idea to save a few edits [[User:Adam.J.W.C.|Adam]] ([[User talk:Adam.J.W.C.|talk]]) 03:14, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
531575 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531572 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.220609760E09 +++$+++ Does that mean you don't mind if it's deleted, or you don't think it will be deleted? Perhaps no one's mentioned the links in those templates because they haven't noticed, or because they make a lot of sense there? Hard to comment without knowing exactly which ones you're referring to. Regards,  +++$+++ ::::Does that mean you don't mind if it's deleted, or you don't think it will be deleted? Perhaps no one's mentioned the links in those templates because they haven't noticed, or because they make a lot of sense there? Hard to comment without knowing exactly which ones you're referring to. Regards, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:16, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

7285 +++$+++ SVU4671 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-07 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.275899160E09 +++$+++ Please I have made the episode list 'simple' (ex. [[List of NCIS episodes]], [[List of Law & Order: CI episodes]], [[List of M*A*S*H episodes]]) if you will. All the excess information was moved to a subarticle (i.e. [[In Plain Sight (season 1)]]) if you will. The more excess and uneeded info on the MAIN episode list the harder it is to find what you are looking for. It all needs it's own seasons-by-season article.  +++$+++ Please I have made the episode list 'simple' (ex. [[List of NCIS episodes]], [[List of Law & Order: CI episodes]], [[List of M*A*S*H episodes]]) if you will. All the excess information was moved to a subarticle (i.e. [[In Plain Sight (season 1)]]) if you will. The more excess and uneeded info on the MAIN episode list the harder it is to find what you are looking for. It all needs it's own seasons-by-season article. [[User:SVU4671|SVU4671]] ([[User talk:SVU4671|talk]]) 01:26, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
7286 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7285 +++$+++ 7285 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.275899340E09 +++$+++ You cannot make these changes when it was discussed and consensus reached to restore the article.  \"Making it simple\" is not sufficient reason - see the discussion on the list article's discussion page, which includes links to the criteria for a split.  Those criteria haven't been met.   +++$+++ : You cannot make these changes when it was discussed and consensus reached to restore the article.  "Making it simple" is not sufficient reason - see the discussion on the list article's discussion page, which includes links to the criteria for a split.  Those criteria haven't been met.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 01:29, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

7287 +++$+++ Bbb23 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-12 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.276384140E09 +++$+++ Thank you for correcting my inadvertent error on the year of one of his films.-- +++$+++ Thank you for correcting my inadvertent error on the year of one of his films.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 16:09, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
7288 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7287 +++$+++ 7287 +++$+++ 2010-06-12 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.276393380E09 +++$+++ Well, I don't see that after makes it any clearer that he's left ER, or that it's even particularly relevant given the passage discusses work both during and after the time he ''started'' on the show, but this isn't a hill I'd care to die on.  Recently is a necessary evil to avoid some of the awkward construction I fixed.   +++$+++ : Well, I don't see that after makes it any clearer that he's left ER, or that it's even particularly relevant given the passage discusses work both during and after the time he ''started'' on the show, but this isn't a hill I'd care to die on.  Recently is a necessary evil to avoid some of the awkward construction I fixed.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 18:43, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

531576 +++$+++ Adam.J.W.C. +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-05 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.220610120E09 +++$+++ I found them somewhere along my travels, I forget which ones they were. I meant that I wasn't concerned about it being deleted but I can see that user Steven is trying to entrap me by undoing all of my edits concerning the portal links and draw me into some kind of edit ware and then get me blocked. I think I may have to report this somewhere. Also I know that this admin like to stalk edits and change things just to get under your skin.  +++$+++ I found them somewhere along my travels, I forget which ones they were. I meant that I wasn't concerned about it being deleted but I can see that user Steven is trying to entrap me by undoing all of my edits concerning the portal links and draw me into some kind of edit ware and then get me blocked. I think I may have to report this somewhere. Also I know that this admin like to stalk edits and change things just to get under your skin. [[User:Adam.J.W.C.|Adam]] ([[User talk:Adam.J.W.C.|talk]]) 03:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
531577 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531576 +++$+++ 531576 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.220610300E09 +++$+++ Have you tried discussing it with him? Perhaps he can explain his reasoning? Or if you say your point of view on the noticeboard, perhaps a consensus can be established and the links kept?  +++$+++ :Have you tried discussing it with him? Perhaps he can explain his reasoning? Or if you say your point of view on the noticeboard, perhaps a consensus can be established and the links kept? [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
531578 +++$+++ Adam.J.W.C. +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531576 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.220626020E09 +++$+++ I have a feeling that this may be like talking to a brick wall due to the fact that I have been blocked a couple of times by these admins so I think there might be some bias involved. Also if the Bankstown Bunker article and the subject itself is in the City of Bankstown then why is it irrelevant to have the portal link in the article especially when the article is in the portal, its like not having the Portal Military Australia not in an article about the Australian army , regardless of how shameful there history is  +++$+++ :::I have a feeling that this may be like talking to a brick wall due to the fact that I have been blocked a couple of times by these admins so I think there might be some bias involved. Also if the Bankstown Bunker article and the subject itself is in the City of Bankstown then why is it irrelevant to have the portal link in the article especially when the article is in the portal, its like not having the Portal Military Australia not in an article about the Australian army , regardless of how shameful there history is [[User:Adam.J.W.C.|Adam]] ([[User talk:Adam.J.W.C.|talk]]) 07:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
531579 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531576 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-06 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.220695440E09 +++$+++ I just didn't see someone looking at the Bankstown Bunker article, then deciding to go to the portal. It seems, to me anyway, just related to the City of Bankstown article and not as much to other articles about things\/places in Bankstown. I didn't create the WA portal, so I don't know the reasoning behind this, but as a comparison it's only linked to from a few articles.  +++$+++ ::::I just didn't see someone looking at the Bankstown Bunker article, then deciding to go to the portal. It seems, to me anyway, just related to the City of Bankstown article and not as much to other articles about things/places in Bankstown. I didn't create the WA portal, so I don't know the reasoning behind this, but as a comparison it's only linked to from a few articles. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:04, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

7289 +++$+++ Cshashaty +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-28 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.277758980E09 +++$+++ I'll take the action to write up a description of how the scoring is done. Let me know if you have any suggestions!  :-)  -- +++$+++ I'll take the action to write up a description of how the scoring is done. Let me know if you have any suggestions!  :-)  --[[User:Cshashaty|Cshashaty]] ([[User talk:Cshashaty|talk]]) 14:03, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
7290 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7289 +++$+++ 7289 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.277762220E09 +++$+++ I'd wait until you have consensus that it even needs to be there.  Right now, there's no meaningful discussion taking place, and no consensus.   +++$+++ : I'd wait until you have consensus that it even needs to be there.  Right now, there's no meaningful discussion taking place, and no consensus.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 14:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

7291 +++$+++ AussieLegend +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-10 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.278790680E09 +++$+++ Is there any chance of you enabling email to you, even for a short time? I've got something to tell you that I'd rather say off-Wiki. -- +++$+++ Is there any chance of you enabling email to you, even for a short time? I've got something to tell you that I'd rather say off-Wiki. --[[User:AussieLegend|AussieLegend]] ([[User talk:AussieLegend|talk]]) 12:38, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
7292 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7291 +++$+++ 7291 +++$+++ 2010-07-10 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.278793140E09 +++$+++ Done!  +++$+++ : Done! [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 13:19, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
7293 +++$+++ AussieLegend +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7291 +++$+++ 7292 +++$+++ 2010-07-10 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.278793920E09 +++$+++ That's strange. There's no \"E-mail this user\" link. - +++$+++ ::That's strange. There's no "E-mail this user" link. -[[User:AussieLegend|AussieLegend]] ([[User talk:AussieLegend|talk]]) 13:32, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
7294 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7291 +++$+++ 7293 +++$+++ 2010-07-10 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.278794040E09 +++$+++ Try again.  I didn't realize at first that I had to confirm it.  I just e-mailed you, and it worked.  +++$+++ ::: Try again.  I didn't realize at first that I had to confirm it.  I just e-mailed you, and it worked. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 13:34, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
7295 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7291 +++$+++ 7291 +++$+++ 2010-07-13 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.279079160E09 +++$+++ I have no position on the issue.  I simply took it back to where it started before what appears to be a budding edit war got going.  I would suggest you leave it as is and discuss the situation, with an eye toward consensus, before making any further changes.  You clearly have a valid argument to be made, but trying to simply make edits such as your wish, against long-standing consensus, will simply result in an edit war.  Use the discussion route, and you stand a far better chance of getting where you want to be.   +++$+++ : I have no position on the issue.  I simply took it back to where it started before what appears to be a budding edit war got going.  I would suggest you leave it as is and discuss the situation, with an eye toward consensus, before making any further changes.  You clearly have a valid argument to be made, but trying to simply make edits such as your wish, against long-standing consensus, will simply result in an edit war.  Use the discussion route, and you stand a far better chance of getting where you want to be.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 20:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

531580 +++$+++ BorgQueen +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531580 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-08 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.220884020E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> -- +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --[[User:BorgQueen|BorgQueen]] ([[User talk:BorgQueen|talk]]) 07:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
531581 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531580 +++$+++ 531580 +++$+++ 2008-09-10 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.221037980E09 +++$+++ Hi. I can't check the contents of the page as it was deleted on 28 August. From memory, it read like an advertisement for data vault modelling and your website, where you sell books and training on the subject, which is why it was deleted. For the future, you might find it helpful to read the [[WP:COI|conflict of interest guideline]]. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi. I can't check the contents of the page as it was deleted on 28 August. From memory, it read like an advertisement for data vault modelling and your website, where you sell books and training on the subject, which is why it was deleted. For the future, you might find it helpful to read the [[WP:COI|conflict of interest guideline]]. Regards, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
531582 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531580 +++$+++ 531580 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.221120900E09 +++$+++ Hi Dlinstedt. You need to find references in third-party publications to establish notability. For example, has data vault modelling been reviewed by an industry publication? Have magazine or newspaper articles covered the topic? These are [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] in the context of Wikipedia. Forums and blogs generally aren't reliable sources, so aren't much help when establishing notability, but other websites might be if they're independent from you. Satisfying the [[WP:V|verifiability]] and [[WP:N|notability]] policies by referencing these sources will mean the article won't be deleted, and the first and third tags can be removed from the top of the page, so I think that's your first step.  +++$+++ :Hi Dlinstedt. You need to find references in third-party publications to establish notability. For example, has data vault modelling been reviewed by an industry publication? Have magazine or newspaper articles covered the topic? These are [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] in the context of Wikipedia. Forums and blogs generally aren't reliable sources, so aren't much help when establishing notability, but other websites might be if they're independent from you. Satisfying the [[WP:V|verifiability]] and [[WP:N|notability]] policies by referencing these sources will mean the article won't be deleted, and the first and third tags can be removed from the top of the page, so I think that's your first step. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 01:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

569194 +++$+++ Laptop critic +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569194 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-17 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.163812140E09 +++$+++ stop making my life miserable. why dont you try being in my situation? battries on the laptop is running low, no a\/c adaptor avalible. those bastards at dell can kiss my ass. -- +++$+++ stop making my life miserable. why dont you try being in my situation? battries on the laptop is running low, no a/c adaptor avalible. those bastards at dell can kiss my ass. --[[User:Laptop critic|Laptop critic]] 17:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
569195 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569194 +++$+++ 569194 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.163812260E09 +++$+++ This is not the area in which to air your greivances.  Please read [[:WP:CIVIL]] and cease making provocative and inflammatory comments.  +++$+++ :This is not the area in which to air your greivances.  Please read [[:WP:CIVIL]] and cease making provocative and inflammatory comments. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 17:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

269438 +++$+++ ItsLassieTime +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-12 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.234458900E09 +++$+++ I'm sending the article back to GA with the hope of having a reviewer \"work with me\" on improving the article rather than summarily dismissing it.  If this is something a reviewer cannot do or does not want to do, I think it best that a reviewer remove himself from the article rather than dismissing it \"Fail\". The reviewer should give the editor an opportunity to improve an article during an \"on hold\" period before dismising it as \"Fail\".  +++$+++ I'm sending the article back to GA with the hope of having a reviewer "work with me" on improving the article rather than summarily dismissing it.  If this is something a reviewer cannot do or does not want to do, I think it best that a reviewer remove himself from the article rather than dismissing it "Fail". The reviewer should give the editor an opportunity to improve an article during an "on hold" period before dismising it as "Fail". [[User:ItsLassieTime|ItsLassieTime]] ([[User talk:ItsLassieTime|talk]]) 09:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269439 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269438 +++$+++ 269438 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.234472280E09 +++$+++ Regretfully, I failed the article because it was no where near meeting the criteria for a GA. In my opinion, the amount of work needed is massive. Not only does the article need to be rewritten, but much more research needs to go into it. Please do not resubmit it before you have tried to improve the article yourself. It is not the reviewers job to do this work for you. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Regretfully, I failed the article because it was no where near meeting the criteria for a GA. In my opinion, the amount of work needed is massive. Not only does the article need to be rewritten, but much more research needs to go into it. Please do not resubmit it before you have tried to improve the article yourself. It is not the reviewers job to do this work for you. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269440 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269438 +++$+++ 269439 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.234479060E09 +++$+++ There are some people you just [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Philcha&diff=cur can't] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AItsLassieTime&diff=270215317&oldid=270178739 help] :-(  +++$+++ ::There are some people you just [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Philcha&diff=cur can't] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AItsLassieTime&diff=270215317&oldid=270178739 help] :-( [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 14:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269441 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269438 +++$+++ 269440 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.234480200E09 +++$+++ I am getting burned out. I am tired of rewriting GA articles for such editors. Some editors are very responsive and it is a pleasure. But looking at an article by that same editor that just passed as GA [[Ruth Martin (Lassie)]] and I begin to think that, by and large, the GA effort is pointless. When editors have come to \"expect\" a massive effort by the reviewer, as I this case, then I will refuse. To fulfill those expectations merely serves to increase the intensity of those demands (they are morphing into entitlements) in future GANs, I think. That is why I failed it.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I am getting burned out. I am tired of rewriting GA articles for such editors. Some editors are very responsive and it is a pleasure. But looking at an article by that same editor that just passed as GA [[Ruth Martin (Lassie)]] and I begin to think that, by and large, the GA effort is pointless. When editors have come to "expect" a massive effort by the reviewer, as I this case, then I will refuse. To fulfill those expectations merely serves to increase the intensity of those demands (they are morphing into entitlements) in future GANs, I think. That is why I failed it.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269442 +++$+++ ItsLassieTime +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269438 +++$+++ 269441 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.234481820E09 +++$+++ Nobody is asking you to rewrite anything. The article gives the reader the facts - publication history, first English translation (this is an Eng encyclopedia), source, and a bit of background. What more do you want? What do you expect to find by consulting more references? Some huge surprise missed by everyone else? Or is it just more for the sake of more? This is ''one'' short story -- not the Bible, the complete Shakespeare, or Homer. As you pointed out in your review I used the best and most current material from a dean of humantiies at Harvard and an Andersen biographer, art correspondent and literary critic for the ''Financial Times''.  Why should I drag around looking for less? If you don't want to 'work' on an article by placing it on hold for a few days, (that's the point, or WP wouldn't offer it) then stop reviewing! There are plenty of reviewers out there willing to 'coach' an editor along on improving an article and willing to give an editor a chance before '''dismissing an article with 'Fail'.''' If coaching is something you don't want to do then step aside and let someone else do it. As it is you've given the article a negative review which cannot help but influence the next reviewer. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::: Nobody is asking you to rewrite anything. The article gives the reader the facts - publication history, first English translation (this is an Eng encyclopedia), source, and a bit of background. What more do you want? What do you expect to find by consulting more references? Some huge surprise missed by everyone else? Or is it just more for the sake of more? This is ''one'' short story -- not the Bible, the complete Shakespeare, or Homer. As you pointed out in your review I used the best and most current material from a dean of humantiies at Harvard and an Andersen biographer, art correspondent and literary critic for the ''Financial Times''.  Why should I drag around looking for less? If you don't want to 'work' on an article by placing it on hold for a few days, (that's the point, or WP wouldn't offer it) then stop reviewing! There are plenty of reviewers out there willing to 'coach' an editor along on improving an article and willing to give an editor a chance before '''dismissing an article with 'Fail'.''' If coaching is something you don't want to do then step aside and let someone else do it. As it is you've given the article a negative review which cannot help but influence the next reviewer. Thanks. [[User:ItsLassieTime|ItsLassieTime]] ([[User talk:ItsLassieTime|talk]]) 15:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269443 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269438 +++$+++ 269442 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.234482120E09 +++$+++ I suggest [[User:ItsLassieTime|ItsLassieTime]] should look at some articles wehich have passed recently, and see how much or rather how relatively little they needed to be improved in order to pass - compare their contents just before and just after the review. -- +++$+++ :::::I suggest [[User:ItsLassieTime|ItsLassieTime]] should look at some articles wehich have passed recently, and see how much or rather how relatively little they needed to be improved in order to pass - compare their contents just before and just after the review. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 15:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269444 +++$+++ ItsLassieTime +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269438 +++$+++ 269443 +++$+++ 2009-02-12 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.234482960E09 +++$+++ I have and I noticed in the literature GAs that no one has been required to track world translations of their subject or \"world views\" on their subject  in order to Pass. Matisse expects a world view of this one short story. Fer ... why? It's not required in the GA criteria nor has it been required of other GA literature articles. Virtually everything known and written about this one little short story has been included in the article. Researchers tend to repeat each other on these details so there's no reason to consult fifty authorities on the publication date or the story's souce in order to make the 'reference' section look impressive.  I've deleted the images in the article (they posed an issue, dine the article can live without them), I've deleted the quotebox, I've repositioned some material, and have retitled some sections for clarity. Now, what ''specifically'' do we need for GA? Please reference the GA criteria for my enlightenment. This is GA not FA. GA does not require us to be exhaustive on a subject and this subject is one little short story -- not the entire Andersen catalog. +++$+++ ::::::I have and I noticed in the literature GAs that no one has been required to track world translations of their subject or "world views" on their subject  in order to Pass. Matisse expects a world view of this one short story. Fer ... why? It's not required in the GA criteria nor has it been required of other GA literature articles. Virtually everything known and written about this one little short story has been included in the article. Researchers tend to repeat each other on these details so there's no reason to consult fifty authorities on the publication date or the story's souce in order to make the 'reference' section look impressive.  I've deleted the images in the article (they posed an issue, dine the article can live without them), I've deleted the quotebox, I've repositioned some material, and have retitled some sections for clarity. Now, what ''specifically'' do we need for GA? Please reference the GA criteria for my enlightenment. This is GA not FA. GA does not require us to be exhaustive on a subject and this subject is one little short story -- not the entire Andersen catalog.[[User:ItsLassieTime|ItsLassieTime]] ([[User talk:ItsLassieTime|talk]]) 15:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
269445 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269438 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.234526460E09 +++$+++ I apologize to you for this incident. I did not explain myself well. The problem is that any Hans Christen Andersen fairy tale has a universal element, as all fairy tales do. There are common themes that relate to the human unconscious. I am sorry for not being clear. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::I apologize to you for this incident. I did not explain myself well. The problem is that any Hans Christen Andersen fairy tale has a universal element, as all fairy tales do. There are common themes that relate to the human unconscious. I am sorry for not being clear. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:01, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

531583 +++$+++ MrHarper +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-11 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.221138060E09 +++$+++ No problem, I'm fiddling and adding to a rail sucession template, hopefully will be finished soon. +++$+++ No problem, I'm fiddling and adding to a rail sucession template, hopefully will be finished soon.[[User:MrHarper|MrHarper]] ([[User talk:MrHarper|talk]]) 06:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
531584 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531583 +++$+++ 531583 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.221138120E09 +++$+++ No worries, good luck! I stay away from templates myself - too technical for me. :)  +++$+++ :No worries, good luck! I stay away from templates myself - too technical for me. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 06:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
531585 +++$+++ Glen Dillon +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531583 +++$+++ 531584 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.221316500E09 +++$+++ thanks & short note on my [[User talk:Glen Dillon|talk]] page  +++$+++ ::thanks & short note on my [[User talk:Glen Dillon|talk]] page [[user:Glen Dillon|GlenDillon]] 07:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

7296 +++$+++ Emgee1129 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7296 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-21 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.279740120E09 +++$+++ I undid your undo of my revision because while it lengthens the character description by a sentence, it is important info about the character's background. Since there is no page dedicated to a character biography, the overview should contain the most important information, and that fact seems pretty central to Eliot's background.-- +++$+++ I undid your undo of my revision because while it lengthens the character description by a sentence, it is important info about the character's background. Since there is no page dedicated to a character biography, the overview should contain the most important information, and that fact seems pretty central to Eliot's background.--[[User:Emgee1129|Emgee1129]] ([[User talk:Emgee1129|talk]]) 12:22, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
7297 +++$+++ Emgee1129 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7296 +++$+++ 7296 +++$+++ 2010-07-21 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.279765800E09 +++$+++ On another note, I would like to ask at what point a show should start having individual episodes having their own pages. Should a certain number of episodes be produced or is it just when someone decides to begin creating the pages?-- +++$+++ :On another note, I would like to ask at what point a show should start having individual episodes having their own pages. Should a certain number of episodes be produced or is it just when someone decides to begin creating the pages?--[[User:Emgee1129|Emgee1129]] ([[User talk:Emgee1129|talk]]) 19:30, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

7298 +++$+++ Emgee1129 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7298 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-23 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.279889820E09 +++$+++ Thanks.-- +++$+++ Thanks.--[[User:Emgee1129|Emgee1129]] ([[User talk:Emgee1129|talk]]) 05:57, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
7299 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7298 +++$+++ 7298 +++$+++ 2010-07-23 08:11:00 +++$+++ 1.279897860E09 +++$+++ Don't get carried away.  Identify a few notable episodes (I'd say Nigerian, Bank Shot, and the two Davids from S1) for articles.  Not every episode is notable enough for its own article.  Alert me when they're up, and I'll pitch in. To make it easier, follow my talk page, and let's keep the discussion here.    +++$+++ : Don't get carried away.  Identify a few notable episodes (I'd say Nigerian, Bank Shot, and the two Davids from S1) for articles.  Not every episode is notable enough for its own article.  Alert me when they're up, and I'll pitch in. To make it easier, follow my talk page, and let's keep the discussion here.   [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 08:11, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
7300 +++$+++ Emgee1129 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7298 +++$+++ 7299 +++$+++ 2010-07-24 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.279966920E09 +++$+++ Thanks.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks.--[[User:Emgee1129|Emgee1129]] ([[User talk:Emgee1129|talk]]) 03:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
7301 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7298 +++$+++ 7300 +++$+++ 2010-07-25 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.280046480E09 +++$+++ Sorry, it's been a busy couple days, and I let this get away from me.  The deletion of episode articles is often a bit arbitrary, in my experience.  Let me go to work on it and see what I can do.  In the meantime, think about why you feel this particular episode is notable enough to merit its own article.   +++$+++ ::: Sorry, it's been a busy couple days, and I let this get away from me.  The deletion of episode articles is often a bit arbitrary, in my experience.  Let me go to work on it and see what I can do.  In the meantime, think about why you feel this particular episode is notable enough to merit its own article.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 01:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

531587 +++$+++ Glen Dillon +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531587 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-13 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.221349560E09 +++$+++ I second that. An ambitious project on a complex and significant subject. Comprehensively treated.  +++$+++ I second that. An ambitious project on a complex and significant subject. Comprehensively treated. [[user:Glen Dillon|GlenDillon]] 16:46, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
531588 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531587 +++$+++ 531587 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.221393240E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I hope the article gets to FA some day - another thing on the never-ending to-do list!  +++$+++ :Thanks! I hope the article gets to FA some day - another thing on the never-ending to-do list! [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 04:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
531589 +++$+++ Glen Dillon +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531587 +++$+++ 531588 +++$+++ 2008-09-17 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.221672900E09 +++$+++ just saw your most recent edits to the gas crisis article. slick! great skill you have for adding precision, refining, tightening and removing redundant words. I'm going to look over my recent work on WA and the related Petroleum article etc and try and refine the material before you get to it! (But don't let that stop you from applying the knife as you see fit)  +++$+++ :: just saw your most recent edits to the gas crisis article. slick! great skill you have for adding precision, refining, tightening and removing redundant words. I'm going to look over my recent work on WA and the related Petroleum article etc and try and refine the material before you get to it! (But don't let that stop you from applying the knife as you see fit) [[user:Glen Dillon|GlenDillon]] 10:35, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
531590 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531587 +++$+++ 531589 +++$+++ 2008-09-18 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.221727920E09 +++$+++ Haha, a skill I've learnt from applying the knife (or red pen) to my own work. I'll have a look at the petroleum article at some point; just remember I've little technical knowledge of this stuff!  +++$+++ :::Haha, a skill I've learnt from applying the knife (or red pen) to my own work. I'll have a look at the petroleum article at some point; just remember I've little technical knowledge of this stuff! [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 01:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

7303 +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-25 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.280107800E09 +++$+++ I'm keeping an eye on him and I'm sure that means others are too. He's looking for a response and to waste our time. It takes seconds to revert, longer for him to edit, and much more time to enter into lengthy discussions (between ourselves or with him), so I'm just waiting for him to do something more characteristic to make it clear he's a sock or get bored of us reverting him.  +++$+++ I'm keeping an eye on him and I'm sure that means others are too. He's looking for a response and to waste our time. It takes seconds to revert, longer for him to edit, and much more time to enter into lengthy discussions (between ourselves or with him), so I'm just waiting for him to do something more characteristic to make it clear he's a sock or get bored of us reverting him. [[User:Halsteadk|Halsteadk]] ([[User talk:Halsteadk|talk]]) 18:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
7304 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7303 +++$+++ 7303 +++$+++ 2010-07-25 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.280113020E09 +++$+++ That's fine.  But at least start warning the guy or he will escalate.  History suggests that.  At the very least, you're giving him a free pass to vandalise and abuse a user name.  +++$+++ : That's fine.  But at least start warning the guy or he will escalate.  History suggests that.  At the very least, you're giving him a free pass to vandalise and abuse a user name. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 19:57, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

269448 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269448 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-14 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.234648680E09 +++$+++ Do you think you could return to the Lane FAC page and at least note that your concerns have been addressed (if in fact they have been)?  After three weeks, we have no supports and no opposes, I'm concerned that people may be thinking that I haven't addressed your concerns.-- +++$+++ Do you think you could return to the Lane FAC page and at least note that your concerns have been addressed (if in fact they have been)?  After three weeks, we have no supports and no opposes, I'm concerned that people may be thinking that I haven't addressed your concerns.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 13:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
269449 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269448 +++$+++ 269448 +++$+++ 2009-02-14 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.234649460E09 +++$+++ OK. &mdash; +++$+++ :OK. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

44908 +++$+++ Ryulong +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ 44908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.309828920E09 +++$+++ Have you attempted to try iTunes?\u2014 +++$+++ Have you attempted to try iTunes?—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>]]) 18:22, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
44909 +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ Prosperosity +++$+++ 44908 +++$+++ 44908 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.309884180E09 +++$+++ Good idea, but sourcing that would be such a bitch. Plus I'm not sure if the director information is there. -- +++$+++ :Good idea, but sourcing that would be such a bitch. Plus I'm not sure if the director information is there. --[[User:Prosperosity|Prosperosity]] ([[User talk:Prosperosity#top|talk]]) 09:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

7306 +++$+++ 24.176.191.234 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7306 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-28 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.285737180E09 +++$+++ {{IPvandal|66.217.112.3}} has been reported to Administrators noticeboard for repeated \"fan speculation\" sections, references that do not support his edits, and repeated usage of invalid sources. Just thought you would like to know. Trista (user Triste Tierra - cannot log in at work) [[Special:Contributions\/24.176.191.234|24.176.191.234]] ( +++$+++ {{IPvandal|66.217.112.3}} has been reported to Administrators noticeboard for repeated "fan speculation" sections, references that do not support his edits, and repeated usage of invalid sources. Just thought you would like to know. Trista (user Triste Tierra - cannot log in at work) [[Special:Contributions/24.176.191.234|24.176.191.234]] ([[User talk:24.176.191.234|talk]]) 22:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
7307 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7306 +++$+++ 7306 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.285772460E09 +++$+++ Thank you!  This one's been a problem child.   +++$+++ : Thank you!  This one's been a problem child.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 08:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
7308 +++$+++ 24.176.191.234 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7306 +++$+++ 7307 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.285807320E09 +++$+++ \"Problem child\" ?!? My, you are polite....I had several other terms in mind - all of them \"uncivil\" in Wikipedia language. :-) Trista [[Special:Contributions\/24.176.191.234|24.176.191.234]] ( +++$+++ ::"Problem child" ?!? My, you are polite....I had several other terms in mind - all of them "uncivil" in Wikipedia language. :-) Trista [[Special:Contributions/24.176.191.234|24.176.191.234]] ([[User talk:24.176.191.234|talk]]) 17:42, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
7309 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7306 +++$+++ 7308 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.285807920E09 +++$+++ That's my generic expression for editors who need some attention and can't mind their manners.  Uncivil captures this one, I agree completely!   +++$+++ ::: That's my generic expression for editors who need some attention and can't mind their manners.  Uncivil captures this one, I agree completely!  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 17:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
7310 +++$+++ 24.176.191.234 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7306 +++$+++ 7309 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.287274740E09 +++$+++ \"Problem Child\" was blocked for a week after I reported them again. FYI! Trista [[Special:Contributions\/24.176.191.234|24.176.191.234]] ( +++$+++ ::::"Problem Child" was blocked for a week after I reported them again. FYI! Trista [[Special:Contributions/24.176.191.234|24.176.191.234]] ([[User talk:24.176.191.234|talk]]) 17:19, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
7311 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7306 +++$+++ 7310 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.287278280E09 +++$+++ Excellent!! Thanks for being so dilligent.   +++$+++ ::::: Excellent!! Thanks for being so dilligent.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 18:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

269453 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269453 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-14 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.234652280E09 +++$+++ <blockquote>However, LucasArts abruptly canceled the project in March 2004; Purcell described himself as \"frustrated and disappointed\" at the decision, unable to understand why development, which had been proceeding smoothly, had been halted.<\/blockquote> &mdash; +++$+++ <blockquote>However, LucasArts abruptly canceled the project in March 2004; Purcell described himself as "frustrated and disappointed" at the decision, unable to understand why development, which had been proceeding smoothly, had been halted.</blockquote> &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
269454 +++$+++ S@bre +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269453 +++$+++ 269453 +++$+++ 2009-02-14 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.234655340E09 +++$+++ I can't quite see how to integrate such information into the structure. Most of those people are too structured in what they work with, Purcell's everywhere at once. A split-off section dedicated to Sam & Max would be over-the-top, but I can't see a decent place to insert such information into article. Where abouts would you suggest? As you may have guessed, I'm not experienced with writing biography articles, this just isn't coming together in my mind to allow me to write. I also can't see what's to explain about the statement. Purcell worked on the fringes of the project, LucasArts abruptly cancelled it for what seemed to the media as petty reasons, Purcell said he was frustrated and disappointed at the cancellation. Seems reasonable to me. --  +++$+++ :I can't quite see how to integrate such information into the structure. Most of those people are too structured in what they work with, Purcell's everywhere at once. A split-off section dedicated to Sam & Max would be over-the-top, but I can't see a decent place to insert such information into article. Where abouts would you suggest? As you may have guessed, I'm not experienced with writing biography articles, this just isn't coming together in my mind to allow me to write. I also can't see what's to explain about the statement. Purcell worked on the fringes of the project, LucasArts abruptly cancelled it for what seemed to the media as petty reasons, Purcell said he was frustrated and disappointed at the cancellation. Seems reasonable to me. -- [[User:S@bre|Sabre]] ([[User talk:S@bre|talk]]) 15:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

7312 +++$+++ NearTheZoo +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7312 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-03 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.286169360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:NearTheZoo|NearTheZoo]] ([[User talk:NearTheZoo|talk]]) 22:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
7313 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7312 +++$+++ 7312 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.286171700E09 +++$+++ No problem!  I am, too.  +++$+++ : No problem!  I am, too. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 22:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
7314 +++$+++ NearTheZoo +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7312 +++$+++ 7313 +++$+++ 2010-10-04 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.286220060E09 +++$+++ Could you look at the Prime Suspect article, and the discussion page, and share your thoughts. Whether you agree with me or not, I'd feel better if this issue could be a subject for discussion rather than a one-person decision.  Thanks!!  +++$+++ ::Could you look at the Prime Suspect article, and the discussion page, and share your thoughts. Whether you agree with me or not, I'd feel better if this issue could be a subject for discussion rather than a one-person decision.  Thanks!! [[User:NearTheZoo|NearTheZoo]] ([[User talk:NearTheZoo|talk]]) 12:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
7315 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7312 +++$+++ 7314 +++$+++ 2010-10-04 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.286228520E09 +++$+++ I added some comments.  I tend to agree that the content does have a place in the article, but you might want to be careful to note that these comments were largely about he first season, which bore a striking resemblance to PS.  You might also want to find early interviews with James Duff and Greer Shepherd, both of whom state PS was not inspiration.  It would add some balance. I'd also move it down in the article, so it follows the descriptions of the individual series. It doesn't belong so early in the article.  +++$+++ ::: I added some comments.  I tend to agree that the content does have a place in the article, but you might want to be careful to note that these comments were largely about he first season, which bore a striking resemblance to PS.  You might also want to find early interviews with James Duff and Greer Shepherd, both of whom state PS was not inspiration.  It would add some balance. I'd also move it down in the article, so it follows the descriptions of the individual series. It doesn't belong so early in the article. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 14:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
7316 +++$+++ NearTheZoo +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7312 +++$+++ 7315 +++$+++ 2010-10-04 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.286229480E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much! I just read this note from you plus the remarks on the Prime Suspect discussion page, and appreciate everything you've said. I am much more comfortable discussing how and where -- and even if -- the link between the shows should be noted, rather than having one editor unilaterally delete everything I wrote, along with the references. By the way, my original notes were shorter, and part of the \"undue\" weight noted by another editor might be because I added more references in an attempt to satisfy the editor who challenged my sources as \"unreliable.\"  I will search for the comments by The Closer creators you recommend, and try to figure out a better place for the notes.  Again--thanks!!!!  It is obvious we both share a love of certain TV programs! (I was a drama major decades ago whose life took an unexpected turn toward a completely different direction -- but my love of theater, movies, and TV is still a big part of me.) Thanks again!   +++$+++ ::::Thanks very much! I just read this note from you plus the remarks on the Prime Suspect discussion page, and appreciate everything you've said. I am much more comfortable discussing how and where -- and even if -- the link between the shows should be noted, rather than having one editor unilaterally delete everything I wrote, along with the references. By the way, my original notes were shorter, and part of the "undue" weight noted by another editor might be because I added more references in an attempt to satisfy the editor who challenged my sources as "unreliable."  I will search for the comments by The Closer creators you recommend, and try to figure out a better place for the notes.  Again--thanks!!!!  It is obvious we both share a love of certain TV programs! (I was a drama major decades ago whose life took an unexpected turn toward a completely different direction -- but my love of theater, movies, and TV is still a big part of me.) Thanks again!  [[User:NearTheZoo|NearTheZoo]] ([[User talk:NearTheZoo|talk]]) 14:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
7317 +++$+++ NearTheZoo +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7312 +++$+++ 7316 +++$+++ 2010-10-04 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.286232600E09 +++$+++ Quick update (hope I'm not bombarding you with too much info). I did move the location of the section and noted the similarity was evidently more pronounced during the early series (using an early 2006 reference to the show as an \"Americanization\" of the series as a reference).  I did want to share the film clip interview I found -- http:\/\/www.fancast.com\/tv\/The-Closer\/1813\/966634443\/The-Closer---James-Duff-And-Kyra-Sedgwick-On-Recruiting-Kyra\/videos -- which is an interview of both cast and creators of the show.  It is only an excerpt, so it is possible that Duff mentions elsewhere in the interview that he originally envisioned the lead as a man, but here it is obvious that by the time the show was casting, the lead was set to be a woman. That's when Sedgwick's manager enticed her to read the script, calling it \"a little bit like Prime Suspect\" -- and that was the hook that got Sedgwick interested, after she had said she was not at all interested in the show for other reasons, including the fact that she did not want to do a show in L.A.  I'm looking for more!  +++$+++ :::::Quick update (hope I'm not bombarding you with too much info). I did move the location of the section and noted the similarity was evidently more pronounced during the early series (using an early 2006 reference to the show as an "Americanization" of the series as a reference).  I did want to share the film clip interview I found -- http://www.fancast.com/tv/The-Closer/1813/966634443/The-Closer---James-Duff-And-Kyra-Sedgwick-On-Recruiting-Kyra/videos -- which is an interview of both cast and creators of the show.  It is only an excerpt, so it is possible that Duff mentions elsewhere in the interview that he originally envisioned the lead as a man, but here it is obvious that by the time the show was casting, the lead was set to be a woman. That's when Sedgwick's manager enticed her to read the script, calling it "a little bit like Prime Suspect" -- and that was the hook that got Sedgwick interested, after she had said she was not at all interested in the show for other reasons, including the fact that she did not want to do a show in L.A.  I'm looking for more! [[User:NearTheZoo|NearTheZoo]] ([[User talk:NearTheZoo|talk]]) 15:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

269460 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-14 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.234683000E09 +++$+++ As a subject Purcell is notable but not very interesting: despite the ''Fish Detectives'', his career is based entirely on ''Sam and Max'', right back to his childhood; there seem to have been no early struggles, everything just fell into place for him; his private life has been so quiet that the major event was \"adopting\" the Sam & Max idea from his brother. A \"Critical Appraisal\" section would be difficult for the same reason - with most artists the articles on works have fairly detailed critical appraisals and the articles on the artist is an overview of these, but with Purcell it's all ''Sam and Max''. However I'd want to to see a \"Critical Appraisal\" section, even if it's a rehash of the one in ''[[Sam and Max]]''. These things happen - I've just done the phylogeny section of [Ctenophore]] and half of it is is a copy of the phylogeny section of [[Cnidaria]], because the issues are the same. Count your blessings - at least it's not an article about a US highway :-)  +++$+++ As a subject Purcell is notable but not very interesting: despite the ''Fish Detectives'', his career is based entirely on ''Sam and Max'', right back to his childhood; there seem to have been no early struggles, everything just fell into place for him; his private life has been so quiet that the major event was "adopting" the Sam & Max idea from his brother. A "Critical Appraisal" section would be difficult for the same reason - with most artists the articles on works have fairly detailed critical appraisals and the articles on the artist is an overview of these, but with Purcell it's all ''Sam and Max''. However I'd want to to see a "Critical Appraisal" section, even if it's a rehash of the one in ''[[Sam and Max]]''. These things happen - I've just done the phylogeny section of [Ctenophore]] and half of it is is a copy of the phylogeny section of [[Cnidaria]], because the issues are the same. Count your blessings - at least it's not an article about a US highway :-) [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 23:30, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
269461 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269460 +++$+++ 269460 +++$+++ 2009-02-14 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.234683420E09 +++$+++ Thanks! (There is on \"biography\" on the current GAN list that barely mentions its subject.)  &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks! (There is on "biography" on the current GAN list that barely mentions its subject.)  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

269462 +++$+++ Efe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-08 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.234101540E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, how are you. I have left comments on the review page. I am just curious about this line: \"Sorry, I accidently reviewed this article!\". -- +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, how are you. I have left comments on the review page. I am just curious about this line: "Sorry, I accidently reviewed this article!". --[[User:Efe|Efe]] ([[User talk:Efe|talk]]) 05:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
269463 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269462 +++$+++ 269462 +++$+++ 2009-02-08 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.234146480E09 +++$+++ Hi Efe, my comment does look a little strange. I reviewed the article for GA, thinking that I had already signed up to do it. Only when I went back to place it on hold did I see another editor's name there. Since I had already opened the review page, I thought I needed to offer an explanation! The other editor said that I should just continue with the review. Hope all that is OK with you. (It was inadvertent; I have never done that before.) Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Hi Efe, my comment does look a little strange. I reviewed the article for GA, thinking that I had already signed up to do it. Only when I went back to place it on hold did I see another editor's name there. Since I had already opened the review page, I thought I needed to offer an explanation! The other editor said that I should just continue with the review. Hope all that is OK with you. (It was inadvertent; I have never done that before.) Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
269464 +++$+++ Efe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269462 +++$+++ 269463 +++$+++ 2009-02-08 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.234165140E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see. I did not notice there was another editor interested in reviewing it. Its fine with me. -- +++$+++ ::Ah, I see. I did not notice there was another editor interested in reviewing it. Its fine with me. --[[User:Efe|Efe]] ([[User talk:Efe#top|talk]]) 23:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
269465 +++$+++ Efe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269462 +++$+++ 269464 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.234283040E09 +++$+++ Although I still have to add more on the article, perhaps you could re-review it for me to know what's lacking. And by the way, I have left comments on the review page. Thanks Mattisse. -- +++$+++ :::Although I still have to add more on the article, perhaps you could re-review it for me to know what's lacking. And by the way, I have left comments on the review page. Thanks Mattisse. --[[User:Efe|Efe]] ([[User talk:Efe|talk]]) 08:24, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
269466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269462 +++$+++ 269465 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.234316460E09 +++$+++ I will look at it later today, as I don't have time now. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I will look at it later today, as I don't have time now. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
269467 +++$+++ Efe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269462 +++$+++ 269466 +++$+++ 2009-02-17 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.234866540E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. Thanks for passing the article to GA. That was such a nice and challenging review. -- +++$+++ :::::Hi Mattisse. Thanks for passing the article to GA. That was such a nice and challenging review. --[[User:Efe|Efe]] ([[User talk:Efe|talk]]) 02:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
269468 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269462 +++$+++ 269467 +++$+++ 2009-02-17 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.234866720E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. You worked hard and accepted criticism with good will. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::You are very welcome. You worked hard and accepted criticism with good will. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

7319 +++$+++ Logical Fuzz +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7319 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-14 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.289795100E09 +++$+++ Hi Drmargi!  Long time no see, since the awful Coral\/Rosie days, I believe.  I just saw [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_Covert_Affairs_episodes&curid=25740548&diff=396764161&oldid=396758869 your edit] on [[List of Covert Affairs episodes]] where you changed 'comprised' to 'is comprised of'.  Things can be \"composed of\", or \"consist of\", but they comprise.  Not sure where I learned that, but it was from someone here at Wiki, for sure.  I remember being surprised about it, and looking it up.  Apparently it is a very common mistake, one that I used to make often!  Just thought I'd point it out to you. ;) -- +++$+++ Hi Drmargi!  Long time no see, since the awful Coral/Rosie days, I believe.  I just saw [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Covert_Affairs_episodes&curid=25740548&diff=396764161&oldid=396758869 your edit] on [[List of Covert Affairs episodes]] where you changed 'comprised' to 'is comprised of'.  Things can be "composed of", or "consist of", but they comprise.  Not sure where I learned that, but it was from someone here at Wiki, for sure.  I remember being surprised about it, and looking it up.  Apparently it is a very common mistake, one that I used to make often!  Just thought I'd point it out to you. ;) --[[User:Logical Fuzz|Logical Fuzz]] ([[User talk:Logical Fuzz|talk]]) 20:25, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
7320 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7319 +++$+++ 7319 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.289801580E09 +++$+++ Nice to hear from you, too!  I'm not sure where you learned it either, but my style manual disagrees.  Maybe we're looking at American v. British English grammar?  +++$+++ : Nice to hear from you, too!  I'm not sure where you learned it either, but my style manual disagrees.  Maybe we're looking at American v. British English grammar? [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 22:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
7321 +++$+++ Logical Fuzz +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7319 +++$+++ 7320 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.289805240E09 +++$+++ Ah, that may very well be the case...why does English need to be so complicated?  I didn't realize that would be one of those type of things that differs by country. Sorry! (But I'm glad i got to say HI!)-- +++$+++ ::Ah, that may very well be the case...why does English need to be so complicated?  I didn't realize that would be one of those type of things that differs by country. Sorry! (But I'm glad i got to say HI!)--[[User:Logical Fuzz|Logical Fuzz]] ([[User talk:Logical Fuzz|talk]]) 23:14, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
7322 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7319 +++$+++ 7321 +++$+++ 2010-11-15 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.289809740E09 +++$+++ It's good to say hi to you, too!  I've got Elements of Style in my office.  It's pretty much definitive American English -- why don't I check that?  +++$+++ ::: It's good to say hi to you, too!  I've got Elements of Style in my office.  It's pretty much definitive American English -- why don't I check that? [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 00:29, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

531610 +++$+++ Dramafreak92 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531610 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-30 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.222783380E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Dramafreak92|Dramafreak92]] ([[User talk:Dramafreak92|talk]]) 07:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
531611 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531610 +++$+++ 531610 +++$+++ 2008-09-30 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.222783680E09 +++$+++ Hi Dramafreak92, articles on organisations must meet [[WP:ORG|notability criteria]]. Your article on a local children's theatre did not meet this criteria. Please let me know if you have any questions.  +++$+++ :Hi Dramafreak92, articles on organisations must meet [[WP:ORG|notability criteria]]. Your article on a local children's theatre did not meet this criteria. Please let me know if you have any questions. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 07:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

7324 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-20 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.295523060E09 +++$+++ I started changing these because I've noticed they've been leaning more toward this on other shows (such as ''The Office'' and others like that).  I think it's because it makes the number columns smaller.  I thought it was weird, too.  Anywhere we could look to see if there's a new rule about this?  +++$+++ I started changing these because I've noticed they've been leaning more toward this on other shows (such as ''The Office'' and others like that).  I think it's because it makes the number columns smaller.  I thought it was weird, too.  Anywhere we could look to see if there's a new rule about this? [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 03:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
7325 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7324 +++$+++ 7324 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.295523360E09 +++$+++ The problem is # and No. mean the same thing: number.  Some IP editor started them recently, as far as I can tell, but when you use them, you remove the label that identifies the numbering system: number by season or number over the life of the series.  Moreover, using different symbols to signify the same thing is never done in published encyclopedias.  Esthetically, they might look nice to you, but they take away information the reader needs -- it's far less important that the columns are narrower than to have the reader able to tell what the numbers in the columns mean.   +++$+++ : The problem is # and No. mean the same thing: number.  Some IP editor started them recently, as far as I can tell, but when you use them, you remove the label that identifies the numbering system: number by season or number over the life of the series.  Moreover, using different symbols to signify the same thing is never done in published encyclopedias.  Esthetically, they might look nice to you, but they take away information the reader needs -- it's far less important that the columns are narrower than to have the reader able to tell what the numbers in the columns mean.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 03:36, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
7326 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7324 +++$+++ 7325 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.295523480E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see.  Sorry about that.  I thought there was some new thing.  As it stands, I like it (I have a wide monitor, so wide columns don't bother me).  Thanks.  +++$+++ :: Ah, I see.  Sorry about that.  I thought there was some new thing.  As it stands, I like it (I have a wide monitor, so wide columns don't bother me).  Thanks. [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 03:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
7327 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7324 +++$+++ 7326 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.295523600E09 +++$+++ No apology needed!  It's one of those little fads that sweeps through Wikipedia occasionally.  The one that drives me barking is people who put Part 1 or Part 2 in the box with the episode title when it's not explicitly part of the title.  That's just wrong.   +++$+++ ::: No apology needed!  It's one of those little fads that sweeps through Wikipedia occasionally.  The one that drives me barking is people who put Part 1 or Part 2 in the box with the episode title when it's not explicitly part of the title.  That's just wrong.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 03:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
7328 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7324 +++$+++ 7327 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.295523780E09 +++$+++ Definitely.  If that's done, why not call episode 1 \"Part 1\", episode 2 \"Part 2\", and so on for the entire series?  Many shows' episodes are just continuations of the previous, so it's basically a giant several-hundred-part thing.  That drives me crazy too.  +++$+++ :::: Definitely.  If that's done, why not call episode 1 "Part 1", episode 2 "Part 2", and so on for the entire series?  Many shows' episodes are just continuations of the previous, so it's basically a giant several-hundred-part thing.  That drives me crazy too. [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 03:43, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
7329 +++$+++ AussieLegend +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7324 +++$+++ 7328 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.295572080E09 +++$+++ The first editor I saw pushing \u2116\/# was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk%3AEpisode_list&action=historysubmit&diff=371860443&oldid=371851329 this one]. -- +++$+++ :::::The first editor I saw pushing №/# was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk%3AEpisode_list&action=historysubmit&diff=371860443&oldid=371851329 this one]. --[[User:AussieLegend|AussieLegend]] ([[User talk:AussieLegend|talk]]) 17:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
7330 +++$+++ Deliriousandlost +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7324 +++$+++ 7329 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.295573220E09 +++$+++ Part 67 ;) I just thought to say that for a change i actually agree with you on something. \u2116 # is about as helpful as & %. If one doesn't know the symbol it actually looks like the heading is saying NO NUMBER and then has two columns of numbers below it. How odd. I do agree with Xeworlebi that squishing tables at lower resolutions is not nice but i am not in favour of sacrificing context to avoid the squish. <font face=\"Georgia\"> +++$+++ ::::::Part 67 ;) I just thought to say that for a change i actually agree with you on something. № # is about as helpful as & %. If one doesn't know the symbol it actually looks like the heading is saying NO NUMBER and then has two columns of numbers below it. How odd. I do agree with Xeworlebi that squishing tables at lower resolutions is not nice but i am not in favour of sacrificing context to avoid the squish. <font face="Georgia">[[User:Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">delirious</font>]] &amp; [[Special:Contributions/Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">lost</font>]] ☯ [[User Talk:Deliriousandlost|<sup><font color="purple">~hugs~</font></sup>]]</font> 17:27, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
7331 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7324 +++$+++ 7329 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.295574360E09 +++$+++ Oh, our old friend, who also pushes the Part 1\/2 error I noted above as well; he does tend to favor moving the TOC to right screen and a couple other esthetic edits as well.  And woe betide anyone who doesn't agree.  I find the distorting the table argument a bit precious.  Yes, in a perfect world a distorted table should be avoided, but when it sacrifices information, so what if the table isn't perfection? The purpose it to inform, not to get it pretty.  And as I said above, using two symbols for the same term does nothing to differentiate the two columns and violates every MOS you can name, I'd wager.  As I think we four would all agree: content and clarity come first.   +++$+++ :::::: Oh, our old friend, who also pushes the Part 1/2 error I noted above as well; he does tend to favor moving the TOC to right screen and a couple other esthetic edits as well.  And woe betide anyone who doesn't agree.  I find the distorting the table argument a bit precious.  Yes, in a perfect world a distorted table should be avoided, but when it sacrifices information, so what if the table isn't perfection? The purpose it to inform, not to get it pretty.  And as I said above, using two symbols for the same term does nothing to differentiate the two columns and violates every MOS you can name, I'd wager.  As I think we four would all agree: content and clarity come first.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 17:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

269469 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269469 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-13 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.234521300E09 +++$+++ What can I do for the footnotes? I don't quite understand the formatting style used by the article's previous contributors (who did at least 98% of the work before I got there), but it does remind me somewhat of the footnote formatting I've seen on the main [[Dungeons & Dragons]] article.  +++$+++ What can I do for the footnotes? I don't quite understand the formatting style used by the article's previous contributors (who did at least 98% of the work before I got there), but it does remind me somewhat of the footnote formatting I've seen on the main [[Dungeons & Dragons]] article. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 02:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
269470 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269469 +++$+++ 269469 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.234524660E09 +++$+++ Any suggestions? I'm not quite sure what to do.  +++$+++ :Any suggestions? I'm not quite sure what to do. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 03:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
269471 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269469 +++$+++ 269470 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.234525140E09 +++$+++ Not really, as I do not know what to think of the footnotes either. I guess, if you are really interested, the books under references look good. I added one of them from the footnotes, as it was not listed. I almost feel like acquiring a few, as the whole subject is very interesting. Who ever wrote the article must have known quite a bit of detail.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Not really, as I do not know what to think of the footnotes either. I guess, if you are really interested, the books under references look good. I added one of them from the footnotes, as it was not listed. I almost feel like acquiring a few, as the whole subject is very interesting. Who ever wrote the article must have known quite a bit of detail.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
269472 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269469 +++$+++ 269471 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.234526040E09 +++$+++ Yes, [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] seems to have done more work on it than anyone else, but he's been missing for a few weeks. I'll do what little things I can for the article here and there, and if it doesn't work out this time I'll talk to him when he comes back and we can make it really solid before renominating!  +++$+++ :::Yes, [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] seems to have done more work on it than anyone else, but he's been missing for a few weeks. I'll do what little things I can for the article here and there, and if it doesn't work out this time I'll talk to him when he comes back and we can make it really solid before renominating! [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 03:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
269473 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269469 +++$+++ 269471 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.234526100E09 +++$+++ In the meantime, keep posting questions and comments on the review page as you think of them, and I'll deal with them as best I can; if the nom is not successful this time, at least we'll have a very good idea what needs to be improved to move it on.  +++$+++ :::In the meantime, keep posting questions and comments on the review page as you think of them, and I'll deal with them as best I can; if the nom is not successful this time, at least we'll have a very good idea what needs to be improved to move it on. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 03:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

531614 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-01 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.222846560E09 +++$+++ Then there is a tie in with kimberley missions (another article) and kimberley aboriginal communities (another article) as I will be away next week - I wont even try to start any of those :)  +++$+++ Then there is a tie in with kimberley missions (another article) and kimberley aboriginal communities (another article) as I will be away next week - I wont even try to start any of those :) [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 00:36, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
531615 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531614 +++$+++ 531614 +++$+++ 2008-10-01 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.222852140E09 +++$+++ Replied on your talk page [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEntect&diff=242142657&oldid=242140224 here].  +++$+++ :Replied on your talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEntect&diff=242142657&oldid=242140224 here]. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:09, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

531616 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531616 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-01 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.222912860E09 +++$+++ If you have time, please look at [[Gulfton, Houston, Texas]] again. This time it is under a GA review hold period and [[User:Derek.cashman]] is the reviewer. Dr. Cash asked me to add more material to the article which reflected Gulfton as a neighborhood, so I did so. I would like to know how to best deal with the education primary and secondary section, which is now very long and may need reorganizing. Even though Dr. Cash is the GA reviewer, both of us would like some more input in this. :)  +++$+++ If you have time, please look at [[Gulfton, Houston, Texas]] again. This time it is under a GA review hold period and [[User:Derek.cashman]] is the reviewer. Dr. Cash asked me to add more material to the article which reflected Gulfton as a neighborhood, so I did so. I would like to know how to best deal with the education primary and secondary section, which is now very long and may need reorganizing. Even though Dr. Cash is the GA reviewer, both of us would like some more input in this. :) [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 19:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
531617 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531616 +++$+++ 531616 +++$+++ 2008-10-02 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.222935780E09 +++$+++ The review is in good hands with Dr Cash (best GA reviewer for articles about places, IMHO), but I'll have a look when I have some time and see if I can add anything. :)  +++$+++ :The review is in good hands with Dr Cash (best GA reviewer for articles about places, IMHO), but I'll have a look when I have some time and see if I can add anything. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 01:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
531618 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531616 +++$+++ 531617 +++$+++ 2008-10-02 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.222998000E09 +++$+++ Alright - thank you very much :)  +++$+++ ::Alright - thank you very much :) [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 18:40, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
531619 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531616 +++$+++ 531617 +++$+++ 2008-10-08 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.223527320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the advice! I spun high school into its own section and the profile of a typical Gulfton public school student into its section. I haven't totally figured out what I will do with the elementary + middle school section.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the advice! I spun high school into its own section and the profile of a typical Gulfton public school student into its section. I haven't totally figured out what I will do with the elementary + middle school section. [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 21:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

269475 +++$+++ HelenWatt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269475 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-15 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.234689060E09 +++$+++ Why are nominators singled out for GA praise, while others who have contributed and done hard research, for many months to get the article up to standard, don't even get a mention?  +++$+++ Why are nominators singled out for GA praise, while others who have contributed and done hard research, for many months to get the article up to standard, don't even get a mention? [[User:HelenWatt|HelenWatt]] ([[User talk:HelenWatt|talk]]) 01:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
269476 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269475 +++$+++ 269475 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.234689540E09 +++$+++ No reason, other than that editor addressed the reviewer's concerns. They are not really singled out for praise; it is the article that achieves the GA status, not the nominator.   And specific  GA praise means little, except perhaps to the nominator. It has no lasting effect.  Are you concerned about a particular article? (If you were responsible for a specific article reaching GA status, you can claim the honor as much as anyone else.) &mdash; +++$+++ :No reason, other than that editor addressed the reviewer's concerns. They are not really singled out for praise; it is the article that achieves the GA status, not the nominator.   And specific  GA praise means little, except perhaps to the nominator. It has no lasting effect.  Are you concerned about a particular article? (If you were responsible for a specific article reaching GA status, you can claim the honor as much as anyone else.) &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:19, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
269477 +++$+++ HelenWatt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269475 +++$+++ 269476 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.234691220E09 +++$+++ I notice on some User pages, editors claiming GA awarded nominations. I consider wikipedia a collaborative project and that to me is a slap in the face to other editors who contribute and a form of article \"ownership\". It discourages new editors from contributing to existing articles. That's all.  +++$+++ ::I notice on some User pages, editors claiming GA awarded nominations. I consider wikipedia a collaborative project and that to me is a slap in the face to other editors who contribute and a form of article "ownership". It discourages new editors from contributing to existing articles. That's all. [[User:HelenWatt|HelenWatt]] ([[User talk:HelenWatt|talk]]) 01:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
269478 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269475 +++$+++ 269477 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.234691520E09 +++$+++ Well, people are people. If you feel you contributed substantially to an article, you can list it also. The truth will out (to some degree) with the contributors tool. Fill in the article name: [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&page=Forensic+psychology&since=&until=&grouped=on&hideminor=on&order=-edit_count&max=100&order=-edit_count&format=html] &mdash; +++$+++ :::Well, people are people. If you feel you contributed substantially to an article, you can list it also. The truth will out (to some degree) with the contributors tool. Fill in the article name: [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&page=Forensic+psychology&since=&until=&grouped=on&hideminor=on&order=-edit_count&max=100&order=-edit_count&format=html] &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:52, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
269479 +++$+++ HelenWatt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269475 +++$+++ 269478 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.234699680E09 +++$+++ Helpful tool but it doesn't show the real story. Lots of editors do quality edits where they take the time to check spelling, check links, grammar etc before pressing the \"Save page\" button. Editors sometimes save a page without marking it as minor. The tool only shows all recorded edits. I guess it's harder to quantify a quality edit.  +++$+++ ::::Helpful tool but it doesn't show the real story. Lots of editors do quality edits where they take the time to check spelling, check links, grammar etc before pressing the "Save page" button. Editors sometimes save a page without marking it as minor. The tool only shows all recorded edits. I guess it's harder to quantify a quality edit. [[User:HelenWatt|HelenWatt]] ([[User talk:HelenWatt|talk]]) 04:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
269480 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269475 +++$+++ 269479 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.234701720E09 +++$+++ True. If you feel you deserve credit, then do not fear taking it. It is up to you and what you feel you did. Do not hold back from taking credit if you feel credit is due. As you can see. others do not. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::True. If you feel you deserve credit, then do not fear taking it. It is up to you and what you feel you did. Do not hold back from taking credit if you feel credit is due. As you can see. others do not. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
269481 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269475 +++$+++ 269477 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.234693500E09 +++$+++ Unsolicited comment here&mdash;I agree with your concerns, HelenWatt, but at the same time, GA awards (if they're really awards) aren't a zero sum...10 people can claim GA on the same article, if they all helped a lot with writing it; if I worked with you on writing an article then I wouldn't mind if you put a GA doodad for it on your userpage (even if I did 75% of the work on it and you did 25%...you still would have made a valuable contribution).  I guess it would be a problem if someone was trying to go around saying \"hey don't take credit for my GA,\" but I don't know if anyone has ever been that ridiculous.  But anyway, you're right about the spirit of the whole thing: we should be improving articles for its own sake, not for awards or baubles to put on our user pages. ''' +++$+++ :::Unsolicited comment here&mdash;I agree with your concerns, HelenWatt, but at the same time, GA awards (if they're really awards) aren't a zero sum...10 people can claim GA on the same article, if they all helped a lot with writing it; if I worked with you on writing an article then I wouldn't mind if you put a GA doodad for it on your userpage (even if I did 75% of the work on it and you did 25%...you still would have made a valuable contribution).  I guess it would be a problem if someone was trying to go around saying "hey don't take credit for my GA," but I don't know if anyone has ever been that ridiculous.  But anyway, you're right about the spirit of the whole thing: we should be improving articles for its own sake, not for awards or baubles to put on our user pages. '''[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000"><span class="Unicode">ʨ</span></font>ana<span class="Unicode">ɢ</span>]]''' <sup><small>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</small></sup>/<sub><small>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</small></sub> 02:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

7332 +++$+++ Deliriousandlost +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.296167520E09 +++$+++ Since you seem to object to my taking a position on the RfC that is outside of the set options you put forward i have removed all of my initial, revised, and subsequent comments. I don't really take too kindly to you refactoring my comment to exclude it from the direct responses to the formal RfC. Calling my comment inappropriately placed when i undo your refactoring is beyond being polite. You formalised it into a Request For Comments and i commented. My interest and involvement in this show has only been the matter of this inconsistency of sources. I do not like the path that appears to be leading to declaring one source unreliable and the other reliable when they are both published by the BBC but no\xf6ne else seems interested in my observations. At your prompting i have removed myself from the Request For Comments. Considering i was on your side in using topgear.com i am a bit confused by your response but o well. <font face=\"Georgia\"> +++$+++ Since you seem to object to my taking a position on the RfC that is outside of the set options you put forward i have removed all of my initial, revised, and subsequent comments. I don't really take too kindly to you refactoring my comment to exclude it from the direct responses to the formal RfC. Calling my comment inappropriately placed when i undo your refactoring is beyond being polite. You formalised it into a Request For Comments and i commented. My interest and involvement in this show has only been the matter of this inconsistency of sources. I do not like the path that appears to be leading to declaring one source unreliable and the other reliable when they are both published by the BBC but noöne else seems interested in my observations. At your prompting i have removed myself from the Request For Comments. Considering i was on your side in using topgear.com i am a bit confused by your response but o well. <font face="Georgia">[[User:Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">delirious</font>]] &amp; [[Special:Contributions/Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">lost</font>]] ☯ [[User Talk:Deliriousandlost|<sup><font color="purple">~hugs~</font></sup>]]</font> 14:32, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
7333 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7332 +++$+++ 7332 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.296168420E09 +++$+++ Frankly, I'm heartily weary of the whole thing, and would prefer we avoid one another in future.   +++$+++ : Frankly, I'm heartily weary of the whole thing, and would prefer we avoid one another in future.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 14:47, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
7334 +++$+++ Deliriousandlost +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7332 +++$+++ 7333 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.296173940E09 +++$+++ Frankly, you left me a talk back for what? To prompt me to not ignore you. I mean, come on.<br\/>Considering we edit about the same thing and i am not quitting then if you want to avoid me.... <br\/>Whatever you think of it it is still my response to the RFC. How you you like if i were to have removed yours to somewhere else on the page because i didn't like it? You all objected & i re-wrote it. And again i received objection to it. It is a bloody request for comments and you don't want my comment which points out a fundamental flaw in the request being commented on. Moving my comment out of the section for comments was most absolutely uncalled for. Calling it inappropriate was worse. The first version was a bit much with the bold red. That is why i re-wrote it. If you don't call that prompting then you really need to look of the meaning of the word because those were some rather bold hints you repeatedly gave.<br\/>''Which information from the same publisher is more reliable?'' When the approach is the consider the reliability of the publisher in determining appropriate sources and an RfC is set up pitting the publisher against itself in a question of reliability then yes i oppose the RfC. Now Aussie won't let me have the comments removed. How nice. I showed up there to try to help. Clearly it was neither wanted or needed and has been a complete waste of my time. So yes, removing my comments entirely from the rfc is completely intentional so as to be done with it. But you do know we still have common interest in shows like Lie to me*, White Collar, Southland, and probably a few dozen others. I just have no interest at all in Top Gear and only wanted to ensure the info in the episode list would be accurate once the dust settled. <font face=\"Georgia\"> +++$+++ ::Frankly, you left me a talk back for what? To prompt me to not ignore you. I mean, come on.<br/>Considering we edit about the same thing and i am not quitting then if you want to avoid me.... <br/>Whatever you think of it it is still my response to the RFC. How you you like if i were to have removed yours to somewhere else on the page because i didn't like it? You all objected & i re-wrote it. And again i received objection to it. It is a bloody request for comments and you don't want my comment which points out a fundamental flaw in the request being commented on. Moving my comment out of the section for comments was most absolutely uncalled for. Calling it inappropriate was worse. The first version was a bit much with the bold red. That is why i re-wrote it. If you don't call that prompting then you really need to look of the meaning of the word because those were some rather bold hints you repeatedly gave.<br/>''Which information from the same publisher is more reliable?'' When the approach is the consider the reliability of the publisher in determining appropriate sources and an RfC is set up pitting the publisher against itself in a question of reliability then yes i oppose the RfC. Now Aussie won't let me have the comments removed. How nice. I showed up there to try to help. Clearly it was neither wanted or needed and has been a complete waste of my time. So yes, removing my comments entirely from the rfc is completely intentional so as to be done with it. But you do know we still have common interest in shows like Lie to me*, White Collar, Southland, and probably a few dozen others. I just have no interest at all in Top Gear and only wanted to ensure the info in the episode list would be accurate once the dust settled. <font face="Georgia">[[User:Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">delirious</font>]] &amp; [[Special:Contributions/Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">lost</font>]] ☯ [[User Talk:Deliriousandlost|<sup><font color="purple">~hugs~</font></sup>]]</font> 16:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

531622 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-06 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.223286300E09 +++$+++ Yeah, AWB is very sensitive to the mouse scroller. The tiniest click of it by accident and the description reverts to what you had in before. I was quite tired at the time I was doing the fixes and didn't notice until I clicked my watchlist and thought \"oops\", so made the null edits to correct them. Happened twice over the two days.  +++$+++ Yeah, AWB is very sensitive to the mouse scroller. The tiniest click of it by accident and the description reverts to what you had in before. I was quite tired at the time I was doing the fixes and didn't notice until I clicked my watchlist and thought "oops", so made the null edits to correct them. Happened twice over the two days. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 02:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
531623 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531622 +++$+++ 531622 +++$+++ 2008-10-06 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.223286720E09 +++$+++ Good job with the changes though - but I could do without the watchlist flooding. Haha. :)  +++$+++ :Good job with the changes though - but I could do without the watchlist flooding. Haha. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
531624 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531622 +++$+++ 531623 +++$+++ 2008-10-06 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.223287620E09 +++$+++ As it's my second account doing most of the work, I can't block it off my own watchlist either, so I feel your pain. :P The good thing is with trying to do electorates, coords, pops and minor fixes all at the same time it should only require this one run. Thank God, because I'm bored with it already.  +++$+++ ::As it's my second account doing most of the work, I can't block it off my own watchlist either, so I feel your pain. :P The good thing is with trying to do electorates, coords, pops and minor fixes all at the same time it should only require this one run. Thank God, because I'm bored with it already. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 03:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
531625 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531622 +++$+++ 531623 +++$+++ 2008-10-06 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.223287980E09 +++$+++ Oh and it goes without saying if you see anything in the specific areas you tend to watch which I've done which needs fixing (like a scale's out, or coords are not quite right or whatever) feel free to fix. Most of the coord figures I just grabbed off ga.gov.au and some of them are a little out. The purpose of it was after a discussion with one of the tech people on IRC I was told the reasons why Google Maps is both odd and rather selective in its sampling of WA coordinates in its Wikipedia layer - the thing needs to be near the beginning of the article, and needs to be not transcluded in a template. The person also showed me how to use the \"city\" field to best effect, so I was then able to set up an Excel spreadsheet and generate the coord profile from that.  +++$+++ ::Oh and it goes without saying if you see anything in the specific areas you tend to watch which I've done which needs fixing (like a scale's out, or coords are not quite right or whatever) feel free to fix. Most of the coord figures I just grabbed off ga.gov.au and some of them are a little out. The purpose of it was after a discussion with one of the tech people on IRC I was told the reasons why Google Maps is both odd and rather selective in its sampling of WA coordinates in its Wikipedia layer - the thing needs to be near the beginning of the article, and needs to be not transcluded in a template. The person also showed me how to use the "city" field to best effect, so I was then able to set up an Excel spreadsheet and generate the coord profile from that. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 03:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

7337 +++$+++ Cyberia23 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-28 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.296256920E09 +++$+++ Another thing, if you're going call me out on something at least have the courtesy of doing on [[User talk:Cyberia23|my talk page]], instead of another [[User talk:Sue Kastle|user's]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ Another thing, if you're going call me out on something at least have the courtesy of doing on [[User talk:Cyberia23|my talk page]], instead of another [[User talk:Sue Kastle|user's]]. Thank you. [[User:Cyberia23|Cyberia23]] ([[User talk:Cyberia23|talk]]) 15:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
7338 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7337 +++$+++ 7337 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.296267660E09 +++$+++ And you're right there.  I should at least have give you a talkback on your talkpage.  For that, I apologize.   +++$+++ : And you're right there.  I should at least have give you a talkback on your talkpage.  For that, I apologize.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 18:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

269482 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-15 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.234695060E09 +++$+++ <s>:::That's a fair point HelenWatt, and I have in the past taken editors to task for claiming credit for articles they were at best only marginally responsible for. But at the end of the day it's your decision as to whether or not you think that you contributed significantly to the article, whatever \"significantly\" means to you. For me it means contributing content, so no matter how much time or effort I might spend on copyediting or reviewing, for instance, I would never claim to have been a contributor to the article, and so would not expect any credit for it. We each have to decide for ourselves what we believe to be fair. What is certainly unfair though is that reviewers get no credit for anything, just stick when it all goes tits up. -- +++$+++ <s>:::That's a fair point HelenWatt, and I have in the past taken editors to task for claiming credit for articles they were at best only marginally responsible for. But at the end of the day it's your decision as to whether or not you think that you contributed significantly to the article, whatever "significantly" means to you. For me it means contributing content, so no matter how much time or effort I might spend on copyediting or reviewing, for instance, I would never claim to have been a contributor to the article, and so would not expect any credit for it. We each have to decide for ourselves what we believe to be fair. What is certainly unfair though is that reviewers get no credit for anything, just stick when it all goes tits up. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 02:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
269483 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269482 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.234696500E09 +++$+++ The difference is perhaps between \"I wrote\", and \"I significantly contributed to\"? -- +++$+++ :::The difference is perhaps between "I wrote", and "I significantly contributed to"? --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 03:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
269484 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269482 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.234838940E09 +++$+++ This editor's opinion is not welcome on my talk page. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::This editor's opinion is not welcome on my talk page. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

7339 +++$+++  +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-28 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.296251040E09 +++$+++ You wrote: \"Whoa! Puerto Rico is an associated territory, but is not an American state, and it does not use the American flag. It has its own flag, which should be displayed. Check the article here in the Wikipedia.\" Drmargi (talk) 13:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ You wrote: "Whoa! Puerto Rico is an associated territory, but is not an American state, and it does not use the American flag. It has its own flag, which should be displayed. Check the article here in the Wikipedia." Drmargi (talk) 13:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
7340 +++$+++ Sue Kastle +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7339 +++$+++ 7339 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.296256920E09 +++$+++ I had nothing to do with this and agree that Puerto Rico is not an American state, that's why I put the Puerto Rican flag icon. However I believe it was changed back by the creator of the page ([[User:Cyberia23|Cyberia23]]), so you should direct all you \"talk\" conments to this user as he\/she has done with me. Clearly this user does not want to use flags of the countries themselves and reverted all my England, Scotland, and Wales flags to United Kingdom flags, its Cyberia23's page so I cannot change them back. Next time, please check the user history on who edited the page. But I do agree at least PR should have its own flage represented!  +++$+++ :I had nothing to do with this and agree that Puerto Rico is not an American state, that's why I put the Puerto Rican flag icon. However I believe it was changed back by the creator of the page ([[User:Cyberia23|Cyberia23]]), so you should direct all you "talk" conments to this user as he/she has done with me. Clearly this user does not want to use flags of the countries themselves and reverted all my England, Scotland, and Wales flags to United Kingdom flags, its Cyberia23's page so I cannot change them back. Next time, please check the user history on who edited the page. But I do agree at least PR should have its own flage represented! [[user:Sue Kastle|Sue Kastle]] ([[User talk:Sue Kastle|talk]]), 15:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
7341 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7339 +++$+++ 7340 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.296276660E09 +++$+++ Sorry; I had a brain cramp and replied the wrong place, so just ignore or delete my comments.  No sweat there.  I realize we're on the same page regarding PR (which is now correct) and the UK countries; my comments were directed at Cyberia23, which is why they were subordinated under his\/her posting.  Actually, you can change them back as long as you don't violate [[WP:3RR]] or start an edit war -- articles don't have owners (see [[WP:OWN]]), so Cyberia23 has no final say in the matter.  I wonder if we want to initiate a discussion on the article talk page given we're in agreement.  The Union Flag doesn't represent the individual countries but rather the union, and is arguably used inappropriately in this context.  What do you think?   +++$+++ :: Sorry; I had a brain cramp and replied the wrong place, so just ignore or delete my comments.  No sweat there.  I realize we're on the same page regarding PR (which is now correct) and the UK countries; my comments were directed at Cyberia23, which is why they were subordinated under his/her posting.  Actually, you can change them back as long as you don't violate [[WP:3RR]] or start an edit war -- articles don't have owners (see [[WP:OWN]]), so Cyberia23 has no final say in the matter.  I wonder if we want to initiate a discussion on the article talk page given we're in agreement.  The Union Flag doesn't represent the individual countries but rather the union, and is arguably used inappropriately in this context.  What do you think?  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 20:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

531628 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-17 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.224232200E09 +++$+++ I cannot get to it but i can vouch for most of them - can give caricatures of the bunch here at some later date - not too cheeky but revealing in a way :)  +++$+++ I cannot get to it but i can vouch for most of them - can give caricatures of the bunch here at some later date - not too cheeky but revealing in a way :) [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 01:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
531629 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531628 +++$+++ 531628 +++$+++ 2008-10-17 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.224232740E09 +++$+++ The ones you can't vouch for are trouble, I take it? Haha. I'll definitely be there (if only to be prove there are women on teh [[interweb]]s) if other things don't get in the way.  +++$+++ :The ones you can't vouch for are trouble, I take it? Haha. I'll definitely be there (if only to be prove there are women on teh [[interweb]]s) if other things don't get in the way. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 01:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
531630 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531628 +++$+++ 531629 +++$+++ 2008-10-17 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.224264180E09 +++$+++ Note the discussion on the talk page about possibly having it a couple of weeks earlier.  +++$+++ ::Note the discussion on the talk page about possibly having it a couple of weeks earlier. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 10:23, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
531631 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531628 +++$+++ 531630 +++$+++ 2008-10-18 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.224341700E09 +++$+++ One of the things on that date is moveable, so I'll see how that goes first. November is a really busy month for me, so I'll have the same prob no matter which weekend it is... but fingers crossed it'll be sorted.  +++$+++ :::One of the things on that date is moveable, so I'll see how that goes first. November is a really busy month for me, so I'll have the same prob no matter which weekend it is... but fingers crossed it'll be sorted. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 07:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

269485 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-16 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.234829580E09 +++$+++ I thank you for your wonderful help and support. I have completed something like 140 GAs in the past few months and have loved doing it. However, it probably is best for me not rely on you for further help, as your repeated lectures to me on NPOV suggest that you have little faith that I know the basics. If you have a specific problem with an edit of mine that you feel is POV, then feel free to point it out to me. Otherwise, thank you again for your help but it is best I move on. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ I thank you for your wonderful help and support. I have completed something like 140 GAs in the past few months and have loved doing it. However, it probably is best for me not rely on you for further help, as your repeated lectures to me on NPOV suggest that you have little faith that I know the basics. If you have a specific problem with an edit of mine that you feel is POV, then feel free to point it out to me. Otherwise, thank you again for your help but it is best I move on. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
269486 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.234845180E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I have no problem with you moving on and wish you all the best. '' +++$+++ : Anyway, I have no problem with you moving on and wish you all the best. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 20:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
269487 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ 269486 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.234853340E09 +++$+++ I wish you the best also. But I hope you do not feel the need to take over the Scientology article. It seems that you are not disinterested and I am worried about your POV.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::I wish you the best also. But I hope you do not feel the need to take over the Scientology article. It seems that you are not disinterested and I am worried about your POV.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
269488 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ 269487 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.234854180E09 +++$+++ I will add comments to the talk page only, to inform the content dispute, without prejudice to your review. I am disinterested in Scientology, but that is irrelevant. You might reflect that your worries about my point of view could be taken by me as criticism of my understanding of the basics. However, I do not take it that way, and continue not to worry. This is my leisure time. I don't come here to worry. '' +++$+++ :::I will add comments to the talk page only, to inform the content dispute, without prejudice to your review. I am disinterested in Scientology, but that is irrelevant. You might reflect that your worries about my point of view could be taken by me as criticism of my understanding of the basics. However, I do not take it that way, and continue not to worry. This is my leisure time. I don't come here to worry. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
269489 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ 269488 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.234854420E09 +++$+++ Well, I do not perceive you as disinterested. That was apparent to me on your talk page. However, of course you can interfere as you like. I am sorry to see it happen as the editors were dealing with it well, in my opinion. But, of course, you are free to have your own POV. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Well, I do not perceive you as disinterested. That was apparent to me on your talk page. However, of course you can interfere as you like. I am sorry to see it happen as the editors were dealing with it well, in my opinion. But, of course, you are free to have your own POV. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:07, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
269490 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ 269489 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.234854960E09 +++$+++ I still don't understand your usage of \"POV\": would it label \"interfere\" in your own comment as POV? '' +++$+++ :::::I still don't understand your usage of "POV": would it label "interfere" in your own comment as POV? ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
269491 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ 269490 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.234855260E09 +++$+++ I do not understand what you mean. My own point of view is that \"taking over\" an article while reviewing it is unethical. Your comments on your talk page indicated a very definite point of view on your part regarding the subject. You may think it is neutral, but I do not.  I do not think it is right for you to interject it in a GAN article because you think it is correct.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::I do not understand what you mean. My own point of view is that "taking over" an article while reviewing it is unethical. Your comments on your talk page indicated a very definite point of view on your part regarding the subject. You may think it is neutral, but I do not.  I do not think it is right for you to interject it in a GAN article because you think it is correct.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
269492 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ 269491 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.234856400E09 +++$+++ My opinion on talk pages only carries weight per strength of argument. The relevant policy on talk pages is [[WP:CONSENSUS]], not [[WP:NPOV]]. My interpretation of anything anywhere is subject to consensus. I have zero desire to impose my viewpoint on any article. I simply hope to raise neutrality issues to inform discussion. If my arguments are crap, then dismiss them. If they suggest improvements, then follow them. If you feel I have failed in some way to contribute towards improving the encyclopedia, then advise me or chastise me. '' +++$+++ :::::::My opinion on talk pages only carries weight per strength of argument. The relevant policy on talk pages is [[WP:CONSENSUS]], not [[WP:NPOV]]. My interpretation of anything anywhere is subject to consensus. I have zero desire to impose my viewpoint on any article. I simply hope to raise neutrality issues to inform discussion. If my arguments are crap, then dismiss them. If they suggest improvements, then follow them. If you feel I have failed in some way to contribute towards improving the encyclopedia, then advise me or chastise me. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
269493 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ 269492 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.234856520E09 +++$+++ I have withdrawn. You have taken over. I do not want to deal with your POV.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::I have withdrawn. You have taken over. I do not want to deal with your POV.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
269494 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ 269493 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.234856940E09 +++$+++ Applying Wikipedia initials for articles to editors is unhelpful. Can you explain what is \"my POV\" in a way which helps me understand why it makes you so unhappy? If not, simply: sorry. '' +++$+++ :::::::::Applying Wikipedia initials for articles to editors is unhelpful. Can you explain what is "my POV" in a way which helps me understand why it makes you so unhappy? If not, simply: sorry. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
269495 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ 269485 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.234857300E09 +++$+++ You clearly have a point of view. You expressed it on your page. It is not neutral, although you seem to think it is, and therefore you have carte blanche to interfere. Since you have greater power, and you wish to conduct the GAN in a way that I do not like, that is antithetical to my way of doing things, then I have no choice. I resent it but there is nothing I can do except refuse to associate myself with it. It is very unfortunate but then, GAN has become an unpleasant experience between you and Malleus, so it belongs to you guys. &mdash; +++$+++ *You clearly have a point of view. You expressed it on your page. It is not neutral, although you seem to think it is, and therefore you have carte blanche to interfere. Since you have greater power, and you wish to conduct the GAN in a way that I do not like, that is antithetical to my way of doing things, then I have no choice. I resent it but there is nothing I can do except refuse to associate myself with it. It is very unfortunate but then, GAN has become an unpleasant experience between you and Malleus, so it belongs to you guys. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

7343 +++$+++ Deliriousandlost +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-19 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.298135940E09 +++$+++ I have amended the complaint filed against me to name yourself as a co-accused by myself, mostly for creating the side-discussion about me at Aussie's talk page when you had just told me \"''it's very poor form, and quite uncivil, to discuss a user not part of a discussion in that discussion''\". <font face=\"Georgia\"> +++$+++ I have amended the complaint filed against me to name yourself as a co-accused by myself, mostly for creating the side-discussion about me at Aussie's talk page when you had just told me "''it's very poor form, and quite uncivil, to discuss a user not part of a discussion in that discussion''". <font face="Georgia">[[User:Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">delirious</font>]] &amp; [[Special:Contributions/Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">lost</font>]] ☯ [[User Talk:Deliriousandlost|<sup><font color="purple">~hugs~</font></sup>]]</font> 09:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
7344 +++$+++ Deliriousandlost +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7343 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.298140500E09 +++$+++ I have noticed that Aussie has deemed me not welcome in the discussion about me on his talk page. I have added it to the complaint and made a request on Aussie's talk page that all mention of me be removed per your own standard of not being mentioned in a discussion you are not part of and not welcome to participate in. That would mean entirely removing all mention of me and continuing the secondary conversation about SAG on as you wish with a section heading that doesn't name me.<br\/>For making this a 3rd message i do apologies but i am having a bit of trouble keeping track of everything right now and as i notice them i mention them. <font face=\"Georgia\"> +++$+++ ::I have noticed that Aussie has deemed me not welcome in the discussion about me on his talk page. I have added it to the complaint and made a request on Aussie's talk page that all mention of me be removed per your own standard of not being mentioned in a discussion you are not part of and not welcome to participate in. That would mean entirely removing all mention of me and continuing the secondary conversation about SAG on as you wish with a section heading that doesn't name me.<br/>For making this a 3rd message i do apologies but i am having a bit of trouble keeping track of everything right now and as i notice them i mention them. <font face="Georgia">[[User:Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">delirious</font>]] &amp; [[Special:Contributions/Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">lost</font>]] ☯ [[User Talk:Deliriousandlost|<sup><font color="purple">~hugs~</font></sup>]]</font> 10:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
7345 +++$+++ AussieLegend +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7343 +++$+++ 7343 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.298141880E09 +++$+++ I have reverted Deliriousandlost's change of name. Since it's \"my\" complaint and it was about her actions at a specific page, it's inappropriate after more than 3 weeks and 9,500 words to amend a complaint, especially by the complainee. If she persists in such disruptive action I'll take it to ANI myself. The discussion on my talk page will remain. If anybody wants to retract their comments by striking them through, they're welcome to do so. -- +++$+++ :I have reverted Deliriousandlost's change of name. Since it's "my" complaint and it was about her actions at a specific page, it's inappropriate after more than 3 weeks and 9,500 words to amend a complaint, especially by the complainee. If she persists in such disruptive action I'll take it to ANI myself. The discussion on my talk page will remain. If anybody wants to retract their comments by striking them through, they're welcome to do so. --[[User:AussieLegend|AussieLegend]] ([[User talk:AussieLegend|talk]]) 10:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
7346 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7343 +++$+++ 7345 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.298153340E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  I'll deal with the above in due course -- it's very early Saturday morning here, and I have other fish to fry for most of the day.   +++$+++ :: Thank you.  I'll deal with the above in due course -- it's very early Saturday morning here, and I have other fish to fry for most of the day.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 14:09, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

531632 +++$+++ Rebecca +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-17 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.224250860E09 +++$+++ I certainly am, but I've been a bit busy, unfortunately. If you'd like to kick something off I'll gladly help out.  +++$+++ I certainly am, but I've been a bit busy, unfortunately. If you'd like to kick something off I'll gladly help out. [[User:Rebecca|Rebecca]] ([[User talk:Rebecca|talk]]) 06:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
531633 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531632 +++$+++ 531632 +++$+++ 2008-10-18 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.224341700E09 +++$+++ OK, I will have a look at the Wikiproject stuff when I get a chance. Thought you might be too busy, but I didn't want to step on your toes. :)  +++$+++ :OK, I will have a look at the Wikiproject stuff when I get a chance. Thought you might be too busy, but I didn't want to step on your toes. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 07:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
531634 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531632 +++$+++ 531632 +++$+++ 2008-10-18 09:14:00 +++$+++ 1.224346440E09 +++$+++ If he's not to busy as well orderinchaos has started more than little me - and worth a chat - but the last time i checked hes chockers in a manner of speaking -  +++$+++ :If he's not to busy as well orderinchaos has started more than little me - and worth a chat - but the last time i checked hes chockers in a manner of speaking - [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 09:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
531635 +++$+++ Rebecca +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531632 +++$+++ 531634 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.225015860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for creating the thing! I guess a couple of early tasks that come to mind are a) getting some sort of talkpage tag going, so we can work out how many existing artices we have that need maintaining (also good for finding ones that need expansion), and b) getting some sort of to-do list going, and working out where best to get items for that (National Trust, state registers, Commonwealth Heritage List, etc - which ones do we want to use?).  +++$+++ ::Thanks for creating the thing! I guess a couple of early tasks that come to mind are a) getting some sort of talkpage tag going, so we can work out how many existing artices we have that need maintaining (also good for finding ones that need expansion), and b) getting some sort of to-do list going, and working out where best to get items for that (National Trust, state registers, Commonwealth Heritage List, etc - which ones do we want to use?). [[User:Rebecca|Rebecca]] ([[User talk:Rebecca|talk]]) 03:11, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
531636 +++$+++ Rebecca +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531632 +++$+++ 531635 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.225018380E09 +++$+++ Wouldn't be a bad idea, I think. Nice to get a bit more assistance from the beginning if we can.  +++$+++ :::Wouldn't be a bad idea, I think. Nice to get a bit more assistance from the beginning if we can. [[User:Rebecca|Rebecca]] ([[User talk:Rebecca|talk]]) 03:53, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
531637 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531632 +++$+++ 531632 +++$+++ 2008-10-19 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.224419880E09 +++$+++ Hi Paranormal Research. I did a Google search and read through the references you refer to. Constable Worden was a great man and it's sad that he died protecting the community, but as cold as it may seem, he doesn't meet Wikipedia's standard for [[WP:N|notability]] because this is an enyclopedia, [[WP:NOTMEMORIAL|not a memorial site]]. This doesn't in any way diminish his achievements, but the guidelines here are quite strict. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Paranormal Research. I did a Google search and read through the references you refer to. Constable Worden was a great man and it's sad that he died protecting the community, but as cold as it may seem, he doesn't meet Wikipedia's standard for [[WP:N|notability]] because this is an enyclopedia, [[WP:NOTMEMORIAL|not a memorial site]]. This doesn't in any way diminish his achievements, but the guidelines here are quite strict. Regards, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 05:38, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

7347 +++$+++ Ringkichardthethird +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I willingly apologize for the incivility, it was in bad taste. However, since you are the one constantly redoing my edits, I question why you feel it necessary to police the page as such. To look at the history of my edits on the Leverage page, you will notice that while the first round may have indeed been excessive, the second edit was noticeably shorter and was intended mostly to take out what I considered to be confusing and inelegant writing, such as replacing \"catching the bad guys\" with \"making major arrests\". These are effectively cosmetic changes and it frustrated me to see them taken down so rapidly. I feel that it is necessary to note that Taggert and McSweeten ''are'' incompetent (the way the paragraph is written now, this is not implicit), and that Nate and Maggie's marriage ended just as much because of Sam's death as Nate's alcoholism. If you feel that is excessive, would you mind explaining why? -  +++$+++ I willingly apologize for the incivility, it was in bad taste. However, since you are the one constantly redoing my edits, I question why you feel it necessary to police the page as such. To look at the history of my edits on the Leverage page, you will notice that while the first round may have indeed been excessive, the second edit was noticeably shorter and was intended mostly to take out what I considered to be confusing and inelegant writing, such as replacing "catching the bad guys" with "making major arrests". These are effectively cosmetic changes and it frustrated me to see them taken down so rapidly. I feel that it is necessary to note that Taggert and McSweeten ''are'' incompetent (the way the paragraph is written now, this is not implicit), and that Nate and Maggie's marriage ended just as much because of Sam's death as Nate's alcoholism. If you feel that is excessive, would you mind explaining why? - [[User:Ringkichardthethird|Ringkichardthethird]] ([[User talk:Ringkichardthethird|talk]]) 1:05, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
7348 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7347 +++$+++ 7347 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.298445540E09 +++$+++ I would be careful about accusing me, or anyone else, of \"policing\" a page.  Editors take varying degrees of interest in given articles, and you tend to see the same editors more frequently on certain pages.  It's easy to throw around terms like policing or owning an article, but very, very difficult to prove.  Moreover, the guiding assumption around here is one of [[WP:GF|good faith]] -- we assume editors act to improve the article, not for personal or other reasons.  I agree with your point regarding the inelegant writing in the descriptions of some of the characters, catching the bad guys being among the more problematic phrases, but you need to temper your editing with awareness of a few basic guidelines.   +++$+++ : I would be careful about accusing me, or anyone else, of "policing" a page.  Editors take varying degrees of interest in given articles, and you tend to see the same editors more frequently on certain pages.  It's easy to throw around terms like policing or owning an article, but very, very difficult to prove.  Moreover, the guiding assumption around here is one of [[WP:GF|good faith]] -- we assume editors act to improve the article, not for personal or other reasons.  I agree with your point regarding the inelegant writing in the descriptions of some of the characters, catching the bad guys being among the more problematic phrases, but you need to temper your editing with awareness of a few basic guidelines.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 23:19, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

531638 +++$+++ Cygnis insignis +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-26 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.225017540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the encouraging message. You would probably recognise the call, there is a sound file in one of the links. Glad to see you are still contributing. What are you cooking up with Rebecca?  <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps;\"> +++$+++ Thanks for the encouraging message. You would probably recognise the call, there is a sound file in one of the links. Glad to see you are still contributing. What are you cooking up with Rebecca?  <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User talk:cygnis insignis|cygnis insignis]]</span> 03:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
531639 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531638 +++$+++ 531638 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.225018200E09 +++$+++ Yes, probably, I will go have a listen - at night frogs are really noisy at my place so it's likely to be one I've heard before! Yep, I'm still here - glad to see you're back. We are cooking up [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian historic places|WikiProject Australian historic places]], but there's so much to do and it's going to take ages.  +++$+++ :Yes, probably, I will go have a listen - at night frogs are really noisy at my place so it's likely to be one I've heard before! Yep, I'm still here - glad to see you're back. We are cooking up [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian historic places|WikiProject Australian historic places]], but there's so much to do and it's going to take ages. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:50, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
531640 +++$+++ Cygnis insignis +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531638 +++$+++ 531639 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.225019100E09 +++$+++ If they don't make a single plonk sound in unison, they are very likely to be ''[[Litoria moorei]]'' - the Motorbike frog. Good to be back. In reference to the third thread of this conversation, regarding heritage site - cool! I've done a few obscure ones and plan to do some more. I gave up trying to decide which registers are more notable, I mention them all, they often list things for different reasons. <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps;\"> +++$+++ ::If they don't make a single plonk sound in unison, they are very likely to be ''[[Litoria moorei]]'' - the Motorbike frog. Good to be back. In reference to the third thread of this conversation, regarding heritage site - cool! I've done a few obscure ones and plan to do some more. I gave up trying to decide which registers are more notable, I mention them all, they often list things for different reasons. <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User talk:cygnis insignis|cygnis insignis]]</span> 04:05, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

7351 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-06 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.299410400E09 +++$+++ As someone who has worked on various USA shows in the past, including this one, I assume you are fairly knowledgable about the subject.  I've been working on an article for a list of ''White Collar'' characters, which can be found [[User:Kevinbrogers\/Sandbox\/List of White Collar characters|here]].  I've decided it's about time to make one, as many other character lists have been made about shows in the past (some at much earlier points in the show, such as the [[List of Royal Pains characters|''Royal Pains'' character list]]) and have done fairly well.  Any contributions or tips you may have would be welcome.  Thank you,  +++$+++ As someone who has worked on various USA shows in the past, including this one, I assume you are fairly knowledgable about the subject.  I've been working on an article for a list of ''White Collar'' characters, which can be found [[User:Kevinbrogers/Sandbox/List of White Collar characters|here]].  I've decided it's about time to make one, as many other character lists have been made about shows in the past (some at much earlier points in the show, such as the [[List of Royal Pains characters|''Royal Pains'' character list]]) and have done fairly well.  Any contributions or tips you may have would be welcome.  Thank you, [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 03:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
7352 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7351 +++$+++ 7351 +++$+++ 2011-03-06 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.299415500E09 +++$+++ Looks good so far.  I'll keep an eye on it as it progresses; let me know if you want me to read\/edit\/comment at any specific time.  Otherwise, I'll communicate with you about it rather than messing with the article itself.  One thing did jump out at me:  you need to be consistent with the main article in terms of describing main v. recurring characters.  Billing isn't the only measure, and is often determined less by the nature of the role than by the idiocies of a SAG contract.  Sharif Atkins is clearly a main character, as was discussed earlier, whereas Natalie Morales was never more than a recurring character, which is reflected in the table (and discussed on the talk page.)  Aside from that, you're good to go for now!  +++$+++ :  Looks good so far.  I'll keep an eye on it as it progresses; let me know if you want me to read/edit/comment at any specific time.  Otherwise, I'll communicate with you about it rather than messing with the article itself.  One thing did jump out at me:  you need to be consistent with the main article in terms of describing main v. recurring characters.  Billing isn't the only measure, and is often determined less by the nature of the role than by the idiocies of a SAG contract.  Sharif Atkins is clearly a main character, as was discussed earlier, whereas Natalie Morales was never more than a recurring character, which is reflected in the table (and discussed on the talk page.)  Aside from that, you're good to go for now! [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 04:45, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
7353 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7351 +++$+++ 7352 +++$+++ 2011-03-06 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.299415680E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'll switch those.  I was going off billing on the show, but I see now that the main page is a bit different (and rightly so).  Thanks!  +++$+++ :: Okay, I'll switch those.  I was going off billing on the show, but I see now that the main page is a bit different (and rightly so).  Thanks! [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 04:48, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

269497 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-17 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.234862100E09 +++$+++ I am very sorry that you have ignored my advice that matters between editors should be discussed on user talk, not article talk. In that respect, this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Scientology_in_Germany&curid=21354059&diff=271241669&oldid=271241324 edit summary] is particularly unfortunate. It neither contributes to improving the article, nor summarizes the comment you made. The suggestion that I could take over the content in a contentious article such as this is ludicrous, and you open yourself to ridicule by suggesting it. I repeat, I am not an GAN reviewer for this article. I have no special status. I am an editor like any other. When I comment on an NPOV issue, either on my talk page or on an article talk page, it is not a dictat from any sort of authority. All contributions to Wikipedia are judged on their merits. Yours too. '' +++$+++ I am very sorry that you have ignored my advice that matters between editors should be discussed on user talk, not article talk. In that respect, this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Scientology_in_Germany&curid=21354059&diff=271241669&oldid=271241324 edit summary] is particularly unfortunate. It neither contributes to improving the article, nor summarizes the comment you made. The suggestion that I could take over the content in a contentious article such as this is ludicrous, and you open yourself to ridicule by suggesting it. I repeat, I am not an GAN reviewer for this article. I have no special status. I am an editor like any other. When I comment on an NPOV issue, either on my talk page or on an article talk page, it is not a dictat from any sort of authority. All contributions to Wikipedia are judged on their merits. Yours too. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 01:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
269498 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269497 +++$+++ 269497 +++$+++ 2009-02-17 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.234862340E09 +++$+++ Your second reply was much better, however. Thank you for that. '' +++$+++ : Your second reply was much better, however. Thank you for that. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 01:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

7354 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-22 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.300799880E09 +++$+++ Kevin, what's the status of this article at present?  I've got the same message from Daily Editor as you do.  I'd hate to see the two of you working at cross-purposes on the same project.  I know you've put a lot of work in, and I don't want to encourage DE to do what you've already done when collaboration would be a better option.   +++$+++ Kevin, what's the status of this article at present?  I've got the same message from Daily Editor as you do.  I'd hate to see the two of you working at cross-purposes on the same project.  I know you've put a lot of work in, and I don't want to encourage DE to do what you've already done when collaboration would be a better option.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 06:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
7355 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7354 +++$+++ 7354 +++$+++ 2011-03-22 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.300831560E09 +++$+++ I sent DE a message informing him\/her of my article, and suggested that we collaborate on the article.  While I have the outline drawn up, DE has two of the actual descriptions written, so I don't think there should be any problems.  +++$+++ :I sent DE a message informing him/her of my article, and suggested that we collaborate on the article.  While I have the outline drawn up, DE has two of the actual descriptions written, so I don't think there should be any problems. [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 15:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

269499 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-18 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.234949640E09 +++$+++ After 10 badly (mis)spelt [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Scientology_in_Germany&diff=271476184&oldid=271457217 edits] by VoxPopulis the article on [[Scientology in Germany]] now manages to mention \"the Unification Church, ISKCON, Children of God, and the Divine Light Mission\", as well as \"the Waco Siege in 1993, Order of the Solar Temple associated murders and suicides in Canada and Switzerland in 1994, and the 1995 Aum Shinrikyo incidents in Japan.\" Is that what you meant by \"short and to the point\"? :-)) <font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ After 10 badly (mis)spelt [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology_in_Germany&diff=271476184&oldid=271457217 edits] by VoxPopulis the article on [[Scientology in Germany]] now manages to mention "the Unification Church, ISKCON, Children of God, and the Divine Light Mission", as well as "the Waco Siege in 1993, Order of the Solar Temple associated murders and suicides in Canada and Switzerland in 1994, and the 1995 Aum Shinrikyo incidents in Japan." Is that what you meant by "short and to the point"? :-)) <font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|Jayen]]</font>''<font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>'' 01:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
269500 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269499 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-18 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.234950780E09 +++$+++ I am trying to think of solutions. What is that book he is using as a reference? Seiwert, H. (2004), p. 86? I could post on his talk page, asking him to discuss on the talk page first. Then  I could use a few edits to remove his material, and if he reverts, document his editing as disruptive on the talk page, especially if he is not discussing his edits  on the talk page first. [[User:Moni3]] is the admin that put a note on his page before. She might be willing to help again, especially if we do everything right, using the talk page, etc.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::I am trying to think of solutions. What is that book he is using as a reference? Seiwert, H. (2004), p. 86? I could post on his talk page, asking him to discuss on the talk page first. Then  I could use a few edits to remove his material, and if he reverts, document his editing as disruptive on the talk page, especially if he is not discussing his edits  on the talk page first. [[User:Moni3]] is the admin that put a note on his page before. She might be willing to help again, especially if we do everything right, using the talk page, etc.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
269501 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269499 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-18 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.234953360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for having a look. Vp has also asked Gg to weigh in. The source is [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=BhscdzDrCfQC&pg=PA85&dq=isbn:0306478870#PPA85,M1 here]. It is a chapter discussing the German Parliamentary Enqu\xeate Commission on \"so-called sects and psychogroups\", which took place in the 1990s. Its purpose was to address popular concerns about new religious movements. Generally speaking, what has been inserted is from a useful book and a reputable scholar, it's just a bit off-topic and [[WP:COATRACK]]Y the way it's been used. <font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ :::Thanks for having a look. Vp has also asked Gg to weigh in. The source is [http://books.google.com/books?id=BhscdzDrCfQC&pg=PA85&dq=isbn:0306478870#PPA85,M1 here]. It is a chapter discussing the German Parliamentary Enquête Commission on "so-called sects and psychogroups", which took place in the 1990s. Its purpose was to address popular concerns about new religious movements. Generally speaking, what has been inserted is from a useful book and a reputable scholar, it's just a bit off-topic and [[WP:COATRACK]]Y the way it's been used. <font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|Jayen]]</font>''<font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>'' 02:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
269502 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269499 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-18 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.234953720E09 +++$+++ I think he needs to show a point why those specific cults are being mentioned. Otherwise, it is just inflammatory. The articles they link to are poor, and for that reason I would not link to them in an article. Otherwise, lets just keep a watch on what he puts in. He must justify everything. (He has at least become more careful.) &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I think he needs to show a point why those specific cults are being mentioned. Otherwise, it is just inflammatory. The articles they link to are poor, and for that reason I would not link to them in an article. Otherwise, lets just keep a watch on what he puts in. He must justify everything. (He has at least become more careful.) &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

7357 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-07 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.299505740E09 +++$+++ Take it out. Not a big deal.   +++$+++ Take it out. Not a big deal.  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>any time you're ready, Uhura</small> </sup>]]</font> 05:49, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
7358 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7357 +++$+++ 7357 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.299506340E09 +++$+++ Another editor already did.  I'm surprised someone who helps newbies wouldn't know that kind of post doesn't go on the talk page. +++$+++ : Another editor already did.  I'm surprised someone who helps newbies wouldn't know that kind of post doesn't go on the talk page.[[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 05:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
7359 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7357 +++$+++ 7358 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.299507120E09 +++$+++ It's been a long day. :(   +++$+++ ::It's been a long day. :(  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>any time you're ready, Uhura</small> </sup>]]</font> 06:12, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
7360 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7357 +++$+++ 7359 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.299507720E09 +++$+++ I can seriously relate to that.  Ah, well.  Tempest in a teapot, and not much of one at that.   +++$+++ ::: I can seriously relate to that.  Ah, well.  Tempest in a teapot, and not much of one at that.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 06:22, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

269503 +++$+++ Voxpopulis +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-18 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.234952040E09 +++$+++ Can you tell me what you find objectionable [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Scientology_in_Germany&diff=271476184&oldid=271457217 here] and also tell me why [[User:Jayen466|Jayen466]] has not received warnings for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Scientology_in_Germany&action=history  these] edits. If you have specific issues with my recent edits elaborate on the talk page. If you continue display editor bias I will have to raise this as a possible case of admin abuse. Thanks.  +++$+++ Can you tell me what you find objectionable [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology_in_Germany&diff=271476184&oldid=271457217 here] and also tell me why [[User:Jayen466|Jayen466]] has not received warnings for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology_in_Germany&action=history  these] edits. If you have specific issues with my recent edits elaborate on the talk page. If you continue display editor bias I will have to raise this as a possible case of admin abuse. Thanks. [[User:Voxpopulis|Voxpopulis]] ([[User talk:Voxpopulis|talk]]) 02:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
269504 +++$+++ Voxpopulis +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269503 +++$+++ 269503 +++$+++ 2009-02-18 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.234955520E09 +++$+++ and it's not [[WP:GF]] of you to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Mattisse#Short_and_to_the_point discuss] me the way you have with another editor.  +++$+++ :and it's not [[WP:GF]] of you to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mattisse#Short_and_to_the_point discuss] me the way you have with another editor. [[User:Voxpopulis|Voxpopulis]] ([[User talk:Voxpopulis#top|talk]]) 03:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
269505 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269503 +++$+++ 269504 +++$+++ 2009-02-18 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.234956060E09 +++$+++ It is fine if I am referring to your behavior. I am not trying to read your mind. I am saying that you need to show such and such material. That is discussing your behavior. I am saying that such material without context is inflammatory in the article. That is called discussing the material and its context.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::It is fine if I am referring to your behavior. I am not trying to read your mind. I am saying that you need to show such and such material. That is discussing your behavior. I am saying that such material without context is inflammatory in the article. That is called discussing the material and its context.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
269506 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269503 +++$+++ 269504 +++$+++ 2009-02-18 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.234956240E09 +++$+++ To answer your other question, [[User:Jayen466|Jayen466]] has discussed everything at length. Unfortunately [[User:Geometry guy]] reverted much of the discussion on the article talk page. However, if you look in the article history you will see that much discussion took place.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::To answer your other question, [[User:Jayen466|Jayen466]] has discussed everything at length. Unfortunately [[User:Geometry guy]] reverted much of the discussion on the article talk page. However, if you look in the article history you will see that much discussion took place.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
269507 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269503 +++$+++ 269506 +++$+++ 2009-02-18 09:06:00 +++$+++ 1.234976760E09 +++$+++ Please point to any information I have reverted and I will restore it. '' +++$+++ ::: Please point to any information I have reverted and I will restore it. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 09:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

7361 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-08 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.299585480E09 +++$+++ Your report was stale, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/86.133.163.134 the user] had not edited in over four hours.  +++$+++ Your report was stale, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/86.133.163.134 the user] had not edited in over four hours. [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 03:58, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
7362 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7361 +++$+++ 7361 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.299586380E09 +++$+++ The user is in the UK, and I'm in the US (west coast).  There's bound to be a disparity.  Four hours is far from what I'd term stale, particularly under the circumstances.   +++$+++ : The user is in the UK, and I'm in the US (west coast).  There's bound to be a disparity.  Four hours is far from what I'd term stale, particularly under the circumstances.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 04:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
7363 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7361 +++$+++ 7362 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 04:20:00 +++$+++ 1.299586800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 04:20, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
7364 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7361 +++$+++ 7363 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.299586980E09 +++$+++ I'll periodically check that user's edits, and if you see further problematic edits, please let me know directly, and I'll take care of it.   +++$+++ :::I'll periodically check that user's edits, and if you see further problematic edits, please let me know directly, and I'll take care of it.  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 04:23, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
7365 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7361 +++$+++ 7364 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.299592800E09 +++$+++ Will do.  I see this a bit differently because I see his\/her edits as they occur.  I also interpreted \"active now\" as fitting into a broader time frame than a few hours.  There are multiple warnings on his\/her talk page, and this may be one of four IPs (two London and two Manchester) he\/she is using.  That part I can't prove (yet), but when you look at the substance of his\/her edits, it's more than just some jarhead rushing to add incorrect information; it's deliberately added to disrupt the article(s) and has been since the fracas over one of Top Gear's comments about Mexico.  But we've got a plan to deal with him\/her, and that's good for now.  Thanks!   +++$+++ ::::  Will do.  I see this a bit differently because I see his/her edits as they occur.  I also interpreted "active now" as fitting into a broader time frame than a few hours.  There are multiple warnings on his/her talk page, and this may be one of four IPs (two London and two Manchester) he/she is using.  That part I can't prove (yet), but when you look at the substance of his/her edits, it's more than just some jarhead rushing to add incorrect information; it's deliberately added to disrupt the article(s) and has been since the fracas over one of Top Gear's comments about Mexico.  But we've got a plan to deal with him/her, and that's good for now.  Thanks!  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 06:00, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
7366 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7361 +++$+++ 7365 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.299593400E09 +++$+++ I went ahead and [[WP:SEMI|semiprotected]] several of the Top Gear articles, looks like there's been some long-term disruption and vandalism by anon editors.  That should help, but let me know if there are others.   +++$+++ :::::I went ahead and [[WP:SEMI|semiprotected]] several of the Top Gear articles, looks like there's been some long-term disruption and vandalism by anon editors.  That should help, but let me know if there are others.  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 06:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
7367 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7361 +++$+++ 7366 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.299593520E09 +++$+++ I will, and thanks again, particularly for the semi-protects.  I'm trying to back-track a group of IP's that are in the UK to see if we can find a pattern; I think we've got an IP hopper here, but can't be sure.  I do know one or two have been blocked previously.  Will let you know if anything shakes out.   +++$+++ :::::: I will, and thanks again, particularly for the semi-protects.  I'm trying to back-track a group of IP's that are in the UK to see if we can find a pattern; I think we've got an IP hopper here, but can't be sure.  I do know one or two have been blocked previously.  Will let you know if anything shakes out.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 06:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

269508 +++$+++ Voxpopulis +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269508 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-18 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.234957380E09 +++$+++ These are irresponsible remarks to make about an editor who has not made any disruptive edits to the article. Please try and observe [[WP:GF]] thanks.  +++$+++ These are irresponsible remarks to make about an editor who has not made any disruptive edits to the article. Please try and observe [[WP:GF]] thanks. [[User:Voxpopulis|Voxpopulis]] ([[User talk:Voxpopulis|talk]]) 03:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
269509 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269508 +++$+++ 269508 +++$+++ 2009-02-18 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.234957920E09 +++$+++ I disagree. They are comments directed at your behavior, my behavior, [[User:Jayen466|Jayen466]]'s behavior. Not at personalities, personal qualities etc. Everyone must justify everything. It is a compliment that you have become more careful in your behavior. I have said nothing about you personally. But at least now your behavior does not merit more warnings. That is good. It is also good that you are using the talk page and communicating, albeit somewhat agressively, but nonetheless communicating with me. Maybe we will be able to work with each other. I see that your additions were responsible. I feel that you are doing well. It would be good if we each could become more pleasant in our communications with each other. I wish that would happen and apologize for anything I said to which you took offense.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I disagree. They are comments directed at your behavior, my behavior, [[User:Jayen466|Jayen466]]'s behavior. Not at personalities, personal qualities etc. Everyone must justify everything. It is a compliment that you have become more careful in your behavior. I have said nothing about you personally. But at least now your behavior does not merit more warnings. That is good. It is also good that you are using the talk page and communicating, albeit somewhat agressively, but nonetheless communicating with me. Maybe we will be able to work with each other. I see that your additions were responsible. I feel that you are doing well. It would be good if we each could become more pleasant in our communications with each other. I wish that would happen and apologize for anything I said to which you took offense.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
269510 +++$+++ Voxpopulis +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269508 +++$+++ 269508 +++$+++ 2009-02-18 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.234959360E09 +++$+++ apology accepted, and no offense was taken, just please do not assume my intention is to disrupt or that I have some kind of \"anti-cult\" agenda, I simply do not believe it is wise - and it is potentially misleading - to present controversial subject matter without sufficient context.  +++$+++ :apology accepted, and no offense was taken, just please do not assume my intention is to disrupt or that I have some kind of "anti-cult" agenda, I simply do not believe it is wise - and it is potentially misleading - to present controversial subject matter without sufficient context. [[User:Voxpopulis|Voxpopulis]] ([[User talk:Voxpopulis|talk]]) 04:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
269511 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269508 +++$+++ 269510 +++$+++ 2009-02-18 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.234960260E09 +++$+++ OK, and please do not assume anything on my part, as I had my own problems with the GAN people that only happened to involve that article, but were not caused by any views I have of the article content, other than as it pertained to GA status. I have withdrawn from GA reviewing and do not wish to be involved, other than to do the right thing.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::OK, and please do not assume anything on my part, as I had my own problems with the GAN people that only happened to involve that article, but were not caused by any views I have of the article content, other than as it pertained to GA status. I have withdrawn from GA reviewing and do not wish to be involved, other than to do the right thing.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 04:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

531653 +++$+++ Andhra setty +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-17 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.226954820E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much.  +++$+++ Thank you so much. [[User:Andhra setty|Andhra setty]] ([[User talk:Andhra setty|talk]]) 12:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
531654 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531653 +++$+++ 531653 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.226850000E09 +++$+++ I don't have access to do this, but I will ask the deleting admin to move a copy of the page to your userspace.  +++$+++ :I don't have access to do this, but I will ask the deleting admin to move a copy of the page to your userspace. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 07:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
531655 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531653 +++$+++ 531653 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.226850000E09 +++$+++ No worries, keep up the good work! :)  +++$+++ :No worries, keep up the good work! :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 07:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
531656 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531653 +++$+++ 531653 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.226944620E09 +++$+++ Any website that is primarily focussed on social networking (as opposed to being focussed on something else like sharing photos, with social networking just an added feature) and has a Wikipedia article that shows it meets notability guidelines can be included in [[List of social networking websites]]. This criteria was agreed upon by editors on the article's talk page. To get TopNews Social onto the list, you need to write an article that shows how it meets the notability guidelines (and therefore won't be deleted). You can do this by including multiple independent, reliable references that discuss the website. If you draft a new version of the article on [[User:GoodMorningManji|your user page]], I can have a look and help you meet the guidelines, if you like?  +++$+++ :Any website that is primarily focussed on social networking (as opposed to being focussed on something else like sharing photos, with social networking just an added feature) and has a Wikipedia article that shows it meets notability guidelines can be included in [[List of social networking websites]]. This criteria was agreed upon by editors on the article's talk page. To get TopNews Social onto the list, you need to write an article that shows how it meets the notability guidelines (and therefore won't be deleted). You can do this by including multiple independent, reliable references that discuss the website. If you draft a new version of the article on [[User:GoodMorningManji|your user page]], I can have a look and help you meet the guidelines, if you like? [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 09:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

7368 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-08 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.299636300E09 +++$+++ I see you blocked this account this morning.  Hopefully that will at least slow him\/her down; you might want to take a peek at [[User:86.133.163.241]]; the patterns of edits is very similar, and I hear ducks quacking.  That account has also had a good few warnings.  I don't think there's anything actionable at the moment, but there's potential for it to go active again.  Thanks!  +++$+++ I see you blocked this account this morning.  Hopefully that will at least slow him/her down; you might want to take a peek at [[User:86.133.163.241]]; the patterns of edits is very similar, and I hear ducks quacking.  That account has also had a good few warnings.  I don't think there's anything actionable at the moment, but there's potential for it to go active again.  Thanks! [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 18:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
7369 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7368 +++$+++ 7368 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.299639420E09 +++$+++ Got it.   +++$+++ :Got it.  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 18:57, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
7370 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7368 +++$+++ 7369 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.299639960E09 +++$+++ OH, you're good.  That should take the wind out of his\/her sails nicely!   +++$+++ :: OH, you're good.  That should take the wind out of his/her sails nicely!  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 19:06, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

531657 +++$+++ Dweller +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-23 10:03:00 +++$+++ 1.227463380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the edit - loved the irony of the edit summary! :-) -- +++$+++ Thanks for the edit - loved the irony of the edit summary! :-) --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 10:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
531658 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531657 +++$+++ 531657 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.227467160E09 +++$+++ Me too! Had to laugh when I saw that. I should \"rix\" things more often.  +++$+++ :Me too! Had to laugh when I saw that. I should "rix" things more often. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 11:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

269514 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269514 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-19 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.235111640E09 +++$+++ for all your copyediting at [[Street newspaper]].  I'm beginning to get quite amazed at how good a writer I am in real life and how bad a writer I am on Wikipedia...I guess it has something to do with all the moving stuff around and putting things together so incrementally, losing track of the bigger picture. Oh, well... ''' +++$+++ for all your copyediting at [[Street newspaper]].  I'm beginning to get quite amazed at how good a writer I am in real life and how bad a writer I am on Wikipedia...I guess it has something to do with all the moving stuff around and putting things together so incrementally, losing track of the bigger picture. Oh, well... '''[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000"><span class="Unicode">ʨ</span></font>ana<span class="Unicode">ɢ</span>]]''' <sup><small>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</small></sup>/<sub><small>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</small></sub> 22:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
269515 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269514 +++$+++ 269514 +++$+++ 2009-02-19 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.235111820E09 +++$+++ I think it just has to do with \"new eyes\". When you are familiar with the material, it is hard to be objective!  &mdash; +++$+++ :I think it just has to do with "new eyes". When you are familiar with the material, it is hard to be objective!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
269516 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269514 +++$+++ 269514 +++$+++ 2009-02-21 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.235269500E09 +++$+++ To me \"comprehension, use, and knowledge\" doesn't quite make sense. \"Comprehension\" of language, I understand. By \"use\" of language, you could mean the understanding and use of grammar or structure of language, or you could mean the mechanics of actually speaking. \"Knowledge\", I don't know what that adds. What do you mean specifically by \"knowledge\" of language?  Looking up \"Neurolinguistics\" on Google returns very broad definitions. &mdash; +++$+++ :To me "comprehension, use, and knowledge" doesn't quite make sense. "Comprehension" of language, I understand. By "use" of language, you could mean the understanding and use of grammar or structure of language, or you could mean the mechanics of actually speaking. "Knowledge", I don't know what that adds. What do you mean specifically by "knowledge" of language?  Looking up "Neurolinguistics" on Google returns very broad definitions. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
269517 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269514 +++$+++ 269516 +++$+++ 2009-02-21 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.235270220E09 +++$+++ As for Google, I have long since given up on trying to look up anything on neurolinguistics there, since almost all the results it turns up are spammy pages about the pseudoscience [[neuro-linguistic programming]] (another depressing thing is that that article gets more page views daily than [[neurolinguistics]] does). ''' +++$+++ ::As for Google, I have long since given up on trying to look up anything on neurolinguistics there, since almost all the results it turns up are spammy pages about the pseudoscience [[neuro-linguistic programming]] (another depressing thing is that that article gets more page views daily than [[neurolinguistics]] does). '''[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000"><span class="Unicode">ʨ</span></font>ana<span class="Unicode">ɢ</span>]]''' <sup><small>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</small></sup>/<sub><small>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</small></sub> 18:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
269518 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269514 +++$+++ 269517 +++$+++ 2009-02-21 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.235270880E09 +++$+++ I think the more specific terms you suggest are better. &mdash; +++$+++ :::I think the more specific terms you suggest are better. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

7371 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-11 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.299831000E09 +++$+++ Apologies, I'm not currently able to look into this, I've got a major issue I'm dealing with.  You might want to take it to [[WP:RFPP]]....sorry!   +++$+++ Apologies, I'm not currently able to look into this, I've got a major issue I'm dealing with.  You might want to take it to [[WP:RFPP]]....sorry!  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 00:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
7372 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7371 +++$+++ 7371 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.299832620E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about it;  I appreciate your help.  I was hoping to KISS and avoid an RFP, but the guy is pretty clearly a sockpuppet (I hear ducks quacking all over the place) who's not willing to work within the system, so something will have to be done.   +++$+++ :  Don't worry about it;  I appreciate your help.  I was hoping to KISS and avoid an RFP, but the guy is pretty clearly a sockpuppet (I hear ducks quacking all over the place) who's not willing to work within the system, so something will have to be done.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 00:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
7373 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7371 +++$+++ 7372 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.299847740E09 +++$+++ I took a look and it was an obvious disruptive [[WP:SPA|SPA]] sock, so I blocked the master and sprotected the target pages since there is [[WP:IPHOP|IP Hopping]] going on.   +++$+++ ::I took a look and it was an obvious disruptive [[WP:SPA|SPA]] sock, so I blocked the master and sprotected the target pages since there is [[WP:IPHOP|IP Hopping]] going on.  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 04:49, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
7374 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7371 +++$+++ 7373 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.299848580E09 +++$+++ You are the best.  I really do appreciate the trouble you went to, especially in the middle of a hassle.  This is the second go-round with the master and his puppets (Suffolk County, VA -- pull the other one) and I wasn't relishing the ugliness of a sockpuppet report.  Thank you!   +++$+++ ::: You are the best.  I really do appreciate the trouble you went to, especially in the middle of a hassle.  This is the second go-round with the master and his puppets (Suffolk County, VA -- pull the other one) and I wasn't relishing the ugliness of a sockpuppet report.  Thank you!  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 05:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
7375 +++$+++  +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7371 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.299804900E09 +++$+++ Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Your use of multiple IP's and a registered account to create the illusion you're more than one person (sockpuppeting) to disruptively edit is no longer acceptable. Drmargi (talk) 16:55, 10 March 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ :::::  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Your use of multiple IP's and a registered account to create the illusion you're more than one person (sockpuppeting) to disruptively edit is no longer acceptable. Drmargi (talk) 16:55, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
7376 +++$+++ Occasionallyhelping +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7371 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.299884880E09 +++$+++ An editor has expressed concern? An editor is either 1. carelessly but not deliberately wrong on the facts (in the vernacular, clueless), or else 2. (and this would be even worse) deliberately predisposed, in bad faith, to call everyone who does anything she doesn't like an alternate IP of a single person. I imagine she reckons that in this fashion she can make it a one-on-one and then claim superiority to the \"one\", rather than having to face and do something about the reality that she is simply one rigid person facing multiple openminded people who happen not to agree with her at every moment about every little preference. I see she got a senior wikipedian to lock the \"List of Iron Chef America episodes\" article for a time. Wow, impressive. And did she give him accurate facts in order to get him to do that? ... Apparently WP:VERIFY, WP:POV, and WP:RS only come into play to justify her reversion of edits she dislikes. She might consider deploying those research principles when it comes to her own constant hypotheses of sockpuppetry. Reading around wikipedia pages over the years, I notice that bossy people often make this \"you are all one person\" claim, often without actually proving it with written evidence that withstands scrutiny. Reminds me of olden times on usenet. In this particular case about 74.108.11.202, it's easy for me to call BS, and we'll see how it goes from here.  +++$+++ :::::: An editor has expressed concern? An editor is either 1. carelessly but not deliberately wrong on the facts (in the vernacular, clueless), or else 2. (and this would be even worse) deliberately predisposed, in bad faith, to call everyone who does anything she doesn't like an alternate IP of a single person. I imagine she reckons that in this fashion she can make it a one-on-one and then claim superiority to the "one", rather than having to face and do something about the reality that she is simply one rigid person facing multiple openminded people who happen not to agree with her at every moment about every little preference. I see she got a senior wikipedian to lock the "List of Iron Chef America episodes" article for a time. Wow, impressive. And did she give him accurate facts in order to get him to do that? ... Apparently WP:VERIFY, WP:POV, and WP:RS only come into play to justify her reversion of edits she dislikes. She might consider deploying those research principles when it comes to her own constant hypotheses of sockpuppetry. Reading around wikipedia pages over the years, I notice that bossy people often make this "you are all one person" claim, often without actually proving it with written evidence that withstands scrutiny. Reminds me of olden times on usenet. In this particular case about 74.108.11.202, it's easy for me to call BS, and we'll see how it goes from here. [[User:Occasionallyhelping|Occasionallyhelping]] ([[User talk:Occasionallyhelping|talk]]) 15:08, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

269519 +++$+++ FClef +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269519 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-22 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.235328540E09 +++$+++ Dear Matisse, Thanks for advising me about your nommo for [[Buckingham Palace]].  I've been out of action for a while and see that the period has just expired.  Is discussion still live? Please reply to my talk page. +++$+++ Dear Matisse, Thanks for advising me about your nommo for [[Buckingham Palace]].  I've been out of action for a while and see that the period has just expired.  Is discussion still live? Please reply to my talk page.[[User:FClef|FClef]] [[User talk:FClef| (talk)]] 10:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
269520 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269519 +++$+++ 269519 +++$+++ 2009-02-22 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.235347260E09 +++$+++ Yes, please help in upgrading the article. The discussion is still alive.  All the above links are still relevant as the FAR goes on for quite a while, so your input would be greatly appreciated. The article should meed [[Wikipedia:Featured article criteria]], which have been upgraded since the article's last FAR two years ago. Not being British myself, I find the amount of information considered \"common knowledge\" confusing, with much not explained and   with so few citations given, and many of those just to the Buckingham Palace website; the  lack of scholarly references is a disservice for such an import article for Britain.   &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes, please help in upgrading the article. The discussion is still alive.  All the above links are still relevant as the FAR goes on for quite a while, so your input would be greatly appreciated. The article should meed [[Wikipedia:Featured article criteria]], which have been upgraded since the article's last FAR two years ago. Not being British myself, I find the amount of information considered "common knowledge" confusing, with much not explained and   with so few citations given, and many of those just to the Buckingham Palace website; the  lack of scholarly references is a disservice for such an import article for Britain.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

7377 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-15 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.300228560E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for the barnstar!  Really appreciated, especially now!  And I'm glad I could help...  +++$+++ Thanks so much for the barnstar!  Really appreciated, especially now!  And I'm glad I could help... [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 15:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
7378 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7377 +++$+++ 7377 +++$+++ 2011-03-15 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.300228800E09 +++$+++ You deserve it.  I read a bit of the case, and I'm rooting for you!   +++$+++ : You deserve it.  I read a bit of the case, and I'm rooting for you!  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 15:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

618061 +++$+++ D-Day +++$+++ D-Day +++$+++ 618061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-11 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.123806600E09 +++$+++ I hear you. I'll delete all those images. I'll try to avoid loading images in the future. -- +++$+++ I hear you. I'll delete all those images. I'll try to avoid loading images in the future. --[[User:D-Day|D-Day]] 17:30, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
618062 +++$+++ Slowpokeiv +++$+++ D-Day +++$+++ 618061 +++$+++ 618061 +++$+++ 2005-08-11 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.123808220E09 +++$+++ Pardon me for intruding, and Durin, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think that Durin was suggesting you not load images, but ''copyrighted'' images. Truth be told, almost every image ''is'' copyrighted, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Some are not, for example: Images created by the '''United States''' Government, Images made by the [[USSR]] before May 1973, and others. Take a quick look at [[Wikipedia:Copyrights#Image_guidelines]] and also [[Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags]] for ideas of images one can use. (Note: I've uploaded extremly few images myself, excepting logos, so don't feel bad.) - +++$+++ :Pardon me for intruding, and Durin, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think that Durin was suggesting you not load images, but ''copyrighted'' images. Truth be told, almost every image ''is'' copyrighted, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Some are not, for example: Images created by the '''United States''' Government, Images made by the [[USSR]] before May 1973, and others. Take a quick look at [[Wikipedia:Copyrights#Image_guidelines]] and also [[Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags]] for ideas of images one can use. (Note: I've uploaded extremly few images myself, excepting logos, so don't feel bad.) -[[User:Slowpokeiv|slowpokeiv]] 17:57, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
618063 +++$+++ Durin +++$+++ D-Day +++$+++ 618061 +++$+++ 618062 +++$+++ 2005-08-11 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.123808520E09 +++$+++ Absolutely! It's ok to upload images; there's a LOT of images on Wikipedia. It's not the images you uploaded that are the problem; the problem is their copyright status. Please DO upload images; just make sure they are clear of any copyright concerns. -- +++$+++ :*Absolutely! It's ok to upload images; there's a LOT of images on Wikipedia. It's not the images you uploaded that are the problem; the problem is their copyright status. Please DO upload images; just make sure they are clear of any copyright concerns. --[[User:Durin|Durin]] 18:02, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
618064 +++$+++ Dystopos +++$+++ D-Day +++$+++ 618061 +++$+++ 618062 +++$+++ 2005-08-11 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.123820280E09 +++$+++ If you were to ask my advice, I'd say that the best thing to do is to start with [[Wikipedia:Images]] and stick to sources that you know to be in the public domain. (i.e. free of copyright). If you have a camera, taking your own pictures and granting them to the public could be the most straightforward way to contribute. Good luck, and thanks for putting up with all this lecturing.  +++$+++ ::If you were to ask my advice, I'd say that the best thing to do is to start with [[Wikipedia:Images]] and stick to sources that you know to be in the public domain. (i.e. free of copyright). If you have a camera, taking your own pictures and granting them to the public could be the most straightforward way to contribute. Good luck, and thanks for putting up with all this lecturing. [[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 21:18, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

7379 +++$+++ Ckatz +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7379 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.300402680E09 +++$+++ Hello... sorry to have to ask this, given all your work here, but you need to stop reverting the word \"season\" in place of \"series\" for the list of Doctor Who episodes. Despite the airing on BBCA, the article is written in British English and as such uses the appropriate spellings. (We do not mix spellings, as demonstrated in [[Cheque]].) Incidentally, I dialled up your contributions to see if you had posted about the \"series\"\/\"season\" matter and noticed that you were also reverting in \"Quebecois\" at the \"Iron Chef\" list. Again, please note that we would in fact use \"Canada\" in that case; the notes refer to the country and the subject's own article uses \"Canadian\". Thanks in advance. --''' +++$+++ Hello... sorry to have to ask this, given all your work here, but you need to stop reverting the word "season" in place of "series" for the list of Doctor Who episodes. Despite the airing on BBCA, the article is written in British English and as such uses the appropriate spellings. (We do not mix spellings, as demonstrated in [[Cheque]].) Incidentally, I dialled up your contributions to see if you had posted about the "series"/"season" matter and noticed that you were also reverting in "Quebecois" at the "Iron Chef" list. Again, please note that we would in fact use "Canada" in that case; the notes refer to the country and the subject's own article uses "Canadian". Thanks in advance. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 15:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
7380 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7379 +++$+++ 7379 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.300411260E09 +++$+++ I still disagree.  I made the original edit that added the information about the BBC America promotions for '''season''' six, which is how it's being promoted in the US.  It's not just a matter of preference for American English, it's inaccurate to use the term series to describe what BBC America is showing\/promoting.  The MOS and ENGVAR allow for variations such as this in order to maintain accuracy, given BBC America is not promoting the UK Series 6, but rather is promoting US Season 6.   +++$+++ : I still disagree.  I made the original edit that added the information about the BBC America promotions for '''season''' six, which is how it's being promoted in the US.  It's not just a matter of preference for American English, it's inaccurate to use the term series to describe what BBC America is showing/promoting.  The MOS and ENGVAR allow for variations such as this in order to maintain accuracy, given BBC America is not promoting the UK Series 6, but rather is promoting US Season 6.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 18:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

531668 +++$+++ Timurite +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531668 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-01 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.228175160E09 +++$+++ When a person writes in his user page \"This user comes from Bosnia and Herzegovina\" and later insists that there is no such thing as [[Arebica]] or the person [[D\u017eemaludin \u010cau\u0161evi\u0107]] is a hoax, then either he is a liar and\/or has some motives which has nothing in common of wikipedia's goal of disseminating information. I don't see recognition from his side of making a honest mistake.   +++$+++ When a person writes in his user page "This user comes from Bosnia and Herzegovina" and later insists that there is no such thing as [[Arebica]] or the person [[Džemaludin Čaušević]] is a hoax, then either he is a liar and/or has some motives which has nothing in common of wikipedia's goal of disseminating information. I don't see recognition from his side of making a honest mistake.  [[User:Timurite|Timurite]] ([[User talk:Timurite|talk]]) 15:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
531669 +++$+++ Timurite +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531668 +++$+++ 531668 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.228183920E09 +++$+++ After some thought, I came to understanding that you were right. If a person is decent, they will learn the lesson; if the person is nasty, my (discussed) comments will not help wikipedia anyway.  +++$+++ :After some thought, I came to understanding that you were right. If a person is decent, they will learn the lesson; if the person is nasty, my (discussed) comments will not help wikipedia anyway. [[User:Timurite|Timurite]] ([[User talk:Timurite|talk]]) 18:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
531670 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531668 +++$+++ 531669 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.228247460E09 +++$+++ I agree! I similarly questioned the nominator's motives, but it's best to keep the discussion focussed on what's important -- that those topics are notable and the articles should be kept.  +++$+++ ::I agree! I similarly questioned the nominator's motives, but it's best to keep the discussion focussed on what's important -- that those topics are notable and the articles should be kept. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 11:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

531671 +++$+++ Dan arndt +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-02 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.228210440E09 +++$+++ Have started updating information on the books - consider that the film & TV series should be a separate article - you may want to do some editing magic  +++$+++ Have started updating information on the books - consider that the film & TV series should be a separate article - you may want to do some editing magic [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 01:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
531672 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531671 +++$+++ 531671 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.228248540E09 +++$+++ Looks heaps better already! I will have a closer look when I have more time and see if I can add or improve anything. I agree that they should be separate articles. (BTW, your first edit was much cooler than [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_Perth_bus_routes&diff=prev&oldid=162453981 mine]...)  +++$+++ :Looks heaps better already! I will have a closer look when I have more time and see if I can add or improve anything. I agree that they should be separate articles. (BTW, your first edit was much cooler than [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Perth_bus_routes&diff=prev&oldid=162453981 mine]...) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 12:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
531673 +++$+++ Dan arndt +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531671 +++$+++ 531672 +++$+++ 2008-12-03 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.228299000E09 +++$+++ Well it needed to be done & was bored at the time. Just a check of my first edits & I can't believe what a mess I got myself into simply trying to create a new article (which reminds me to create a draft article for his latest solo album).  +++$+++ ::Well it needed to be done & was bored at the time. Just a check of my first edits & I can't believe what a mess I got myself into simply trying to create a new article (which reminds me to create a draft article for his latest solo album). [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 02:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
531674 +++$+++ Dan arndt +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531671 +++$+++ 531673 +++$+++ 2009-01-05 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.231171920E09 +++$+++ Your latest edits look good - maybe you might want to re-assess the article - doubt if it is 'start' class anymore.  +++$+++ :::Your latest edits look good - maybe you might want to re-assess the article - doubt if it is 'start' class anymore. [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 08:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
531675 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531671 +++$+++ 531674 +++$+++ 2009-01-05 08:16:00 +++$+++ 1.231172160E09 +++$+++ Took me long enough, hey? ;) I think there's still more info to add, but I haven't looked for sources yet.  +++$+++ ::::Took me long enough, hey? ;) I think there's still more info to add, but I haven't looked for sources yet. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

7384 +++$+++ Stefan +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7384 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-29 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.301394000E09 +++$+++ You are behaving very badly, you revert everything I do, just stating 'because I saw it in the show' as your argument, I discuss, you do not say much more than that you are right, then when someone else adds something that is a step towards a reasonable compromise with references (at least more referenced than what you reverted to), you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Top_Chef_%28season_8%29&action=historysubmit&diff=421245164&oldid=421244869 revert] with just a comment in the edit to discuss, please at least write something on the talk page when you revert. I do not want to fight, I do not want to drag admins in or anything, just discuss and reach a compromise, Please try to help a bit. Please read [[WP:WAR]] and [[WP:BRD]], both states that you should not revert and you should discuss. -- +++$+++ You are behaving very badly, you revert everything I do, just stating 'because I saw it in the show' as your argument, I discuss, you do not say much more than that you are right, then when someone else adds something that is a step towards a reasonable compromise with references (at least more referenced than what you reverted to), you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Top_Chef_%28season_8%29&action=historysubmit&diff=421245164&oldid=421244869 revert] with just a comment in the edit to discuss, please at least write something on the talk page when you revert. I do not want to fight, I do not want to drag admins in or anything, just discuss and reach a compromise, Please try to help a bit. Please read [[WP:WAR]] and [[WP:BRD]], both states that you should not revert and you should discuss. --[[User:Stefan|Stefan]] [[User_talk:Stefan|<sup>talk</sup>]] 03:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
7385 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7384 +++$+++ 7384 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.301407080E09 +++$+++ I will reply to your comments in due course, and in the fashion I feel is appropriate.  I find it both arrogant and rude to have another editor tell me I have to reply in a specific manner, much less to feel he has the right do decide what is or is not discussion.  I recognize that you're not a native speaker of English, but that does not excuse such rudeness.  I am now adding [[WP:CIVIL]] to the list of policies of which you need to gain command.   +++$+++ :  I will reply to your comments in due course, and in the fashion I feel is appropriate.  I find it both arrogant and rude to have another editor tell me I have to reply in a specific manner, much less to feel he has the right do decide what is or is not discussion.  I recognize that you're not a native speaker of English, but that does not excuse such rudeness.  I am now adding [[WP:CIVIL]] to the list of policies of which you need to gain command.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 06:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
7386 +++$+++ Stefan +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7384 +++$+++ 7385 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 08:58:00 +++$+++ 1.301414280E09 +++$+++ Sorry I did not mean to be uncivil, I just feel like this has been going on for almost a week and I still cannot understand that you can use the show as the source and that you have not made any attempts to explain why that is acceptable in this case. -- +++$+++ ::Sorry I did not mean to be uncivil, I just feel like this has been going on for almost a week and I still cannot understand that you can use the show as the source and that you have not made any attempts to explain why that is acceptable in this case. --[[User:Stefan|Stefan]] [[User_talk:Stefan|<sup>talk</sup>]] 08:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

7387 +++$+++ 88.104.174.70 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-03 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.301879340E09 +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions\/88.104.174.70|88.104.174.70]] ( +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions/88.104.174.70|88.104.174.70]] ([[User talk:88.104.174.70|talk]]) 18:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
7388 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7387 +++$+++ 7387 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.301879940E09 +++$+++ The Armitage thing wasn't plagiarized; even he isn't commenting on his character's status in keeping with a cliffhange, so the \"not expected to return\" is pure [[WP:OR]] based on your perception of I'm not sure what.  The remainder of the sentence was extremely close to the text in one of your sources, and that's plagiarism.  Rewrite, and source it, and you're good to go.   +++$+++ : The Armitage thing wasn't plagiarized; even he isn't commenting on his character's status in keeping with a cliffhange, so the "not expected to return" is pure [[WP:OR]] based on your perception of I'm not sure what.  The remainder of the sentence was extremely close to the text in one of your sources, and that's plagiarism.  Rewrite, and source it, and you're good to go.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 18:19, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
7389 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7387 +++$+++ 7388 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.301880540E09 +++$+++ OK, apologies.  I went back and had another read; it wasn't as close as I remembered, so I restored some of the text.  The Armitage thing is unsourced and has to stay out, and the rest belongs inside the reference, since it all is covered by that reference.  Also, the cast list in the infobox stays as is until Series 10 begins to broadcast.  The infobox always has the current cast as of the most recently broadcast episodes; we also don't know if any of the characters described are recurring versus main cast.   +++$+++ :: OK, apologies.  I went back and had another read; it wasn't as close as I remembered, so I restored some of the text.  The Armitage thing is unsourced and has to stay out, and the rest belongs inside the reference, since it all is covered by that reference.  Also, the cast list in the infobox stays as is until Series 10 begins to broadcast.  The infobox always has the current cast as of the most recently broadcast episodes; we also don't know if any of the characters described are recurring versus main cast.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 18:29, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
7390 +++$+++ 88.104.174.70 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7387 +++$+++ 7389 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.301880900E09 +++$+++ And just as I was submitting a reply... I was sure one of the sources had mentioned Richard Armitage, but actually they'd mentioned Sophia Myles (incorrectly) as 'boss spook', so apologies. Nevertheless, shouldn't Lucas now be under Non-Grid based characters as, as of last series, he isn't a member of the grid? Regarding plagiarism, I'd never intend to plagiarize which is why I brought it up here. The Sophia Myles thing is also dubious, given the sources suggest she ''has'' departed rather than explicitly stating it. I had another point, but I've now forgotten it. Thanks, --[[Special:Contributions\/88.104.174.70|88.104.174.70]] ( +++$+++ ::: And just as I was submitting a reply... I was sure one of the sources had mentioned Richard Armitage, but actually they'd mentioned Sophia Myles (incorrectly) as 'boss spook', so apologies. Nevertheless, shouldn't Lucas now be under Non-Grid based characters as, as of last series, he isn't a member of the grid? Regarding plagiarism, I'd never intend to plagiarize which is why I brought it up here. The Sophia Myles thing is also dubious, given the sources suggest she ''has'' departed rather than explicitly stating it. I had another point, but I've now forgotten it. Thanks, --[[Special:Contributions/88.104.174.70|88.104.174.70]] ([[User talk:88.104.174.70|talk]]) 18:35, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
7391 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7387 +++$+++ 7390 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.301885640E09 +++$+++ I'd leave Armitage alone until we have a more definitive end to his story.  We spent a good bit of time talking it out at the time, and that was the consensus.  I think the comment on Sophia Myles is OK as is, and it's sourced.  The plagiarism was my error, which I fixed.  Again, I apologize for that.   +++$+++ :::: I'd leave Armitage alone until we have a more definitive end to his story.  We spent a good bit of time talking it out at the time, and that was the consensus.  I think the comment on Sophia Myles is OK as is, and it's sourced.  The plagiarism was my error, which I fixed.  Again, I apologize for that.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 19:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
7392 +++$+++ Duggy 1138 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7387 +++$+++ 7387 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.307388420E09 +++$+++ Why doesn't Richard Armitage count as a reliable source?  +++$+++ : Why doesn't Richard Armitage count as a reliable source? [[User:Duggy 1138|Duggy 1138]] ([[User talk:Duggy 1138|talk]]) 12:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

531676 +++$+++ BorgQueen +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-05 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.228541160E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] -->  +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> [[User:BorgQueen|BorgQueen]] ([[User talk:BorgQueen|talk]]) 21:26, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
531677 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531676 +++$+++ 531676 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.228574580E09 +++$+++ Hooray for getting a DYK without writing a hook or submitting anything to DYK! Thanks [[User:RyanCross|RyanCross]] and [[User:Orlady|Orlady]]. :)  +++$+++ :Hooray for getting a DYK without writing a hook or submitting anything to DYK! Thanks [[User:RyanCross|RyanCross]] and [[User:Orlady|Orlady]]. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 06:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

531678 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-20 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.229817120E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I hereby award you a barnstar for saving [[Road Island Diner]] from deletion and offering a confuddled newbie additional help.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I hereby award you a barnstar for saving [[Road Island Diner]] from deletion and offering a confuddled newbie additional help. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 15:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
531679 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531678 +++$+++ 531678 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.229855340E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Exhibited at the World's Fair, donated to the American Diner Museum, refurbished for $1 million by its new owner, and it served 5,500 customers in the first two weeks open, despite being in a town of only 1,000 residents = no way it should have been deleted. :)  +++$+++ :Thanks! Exhibited at the World's Fair, donated to the American Diner Museum, refurbished for $1 million by its new owner, and it served 5,500 customers in the first two weeks open, despite being in a town of only 1,000 residents = no way it should have been deleted. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:29, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

531680 +++$+++  +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-21 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.229865840E09 +++$+++ Hi Dreadstar. I agree that the above article was crap, but I don't think speedy deleting it as \"patent nonsense\" was correct. Graymornings was able to determine in the AfD that the article was part of the There Goes a... series, so surely therefore it was not patent nonsense? I would have preferred that the AfD was allowed to continue and the lack of the video's notability established so the article couldn't be recreated. Have I misinterpreted something? Somno (talk) 05:24, 21 December 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ Hi Dreadstar. I agree that the above article was crap, but I don't think speedy deleting it as "patent nonsense" was correct. Graymornings was able to determine in the AfD that the article was part of the There Goes a... series, so surely therefore it was not patent nonsense? I would have preferred that the AfD was allowed to continue and the lack of the video's notability established so the article couldn't be recreated. Have I misinterpreted something? Somno (talk) 05:24, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
531681 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531680 +++$+++ 531680 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.229871300E09 +++$+++ That specific article title does not appear to be part of the [[There Goes a...]] series, as Graymornings points out [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Look,_there_goes_a_truck&diff=prev&oldid=259285950 here], and its contents did indeed appear to be patent nonsense (Dave getting hung from a crane by his underwear?); much as the other nonsense or attack articles created by the same banned editor that created this one. But I went ahead and changed the speedy reason to vandalism.  Although I doubt it will be recreated, I'll keep an eye on it just in case.   +++$+++ :That specific article title does not appear to be part of the [[There Goes a...]] series, as Graymornings points out [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Look,_there_goes_a_truck&diff=prev&oldid=259285950 here], and its contents did indeed appear to be patent nonsense (Dave getting hung from a crane by his underwear?); much as the other nonsense or attack articles created by the same banned editor that created this one. But I went ahead and changed the speedy reason to vandalism.  Although I doubt it will be recreated, I'll keep an eye on it just in case.  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 06:55, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
531682 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531680 +++$+++ 531681 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.229871900E09 +++$+++ I must admit that I can't remember much of the article's contents any more, but Dave hanging from a crane by his underwear does seem a little unlikely for a children's show. I couldn't find any mention of that in the [http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/There-Goes-Truck-Real-Wheels\/dp\/6303144217 reviews at Amazon], so I agree that the article's contents were probably just vandalism. Thanks for clarifying that for me. :)  +++$+++ ::I must admit that I can't remember much of the article's contents any more, but Dave hanging from a crane by his underwear does seem a little unlikely for a children's show. I couldn't find any mention of that in the [http://www.amazon.com/There-Goes-Truck-Real-Wheels/dp/6303144217 reviews at Amazon], so I agree that the article's contents were probably just vandalism. Thanks for clarifying that for me. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 07:05, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

7393 +++$+++ Johnmylove +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-04 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.301919600E09 +++$+++ I added the category for aarti sequeira bcoz if she calls herself a catholic, then she should be categorised under Indian Christians or Indian Roman catholics...--[[User:Johnmylove|Johnmylove]] ([[User talk:Johnmylove|talk]]) 05:20, 4 April 2011 (UTC)-- +++$+++ I added the category for aarti sequeira bcoz if she calls herself a catholic, then she should be categorised under Indian Christians or Indian Roman catholics...--[[User:Johnmylove|Johnmylove]] ([[User talk:Johnmylove|talk]]) 05:20, 4 April 2011 (UTC)--[[User:Johnmylove|Johnmylove]] ([[User talk:Johnmylove|talk]]) 05:20, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
7394 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7393 +++$+++ 7393 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.301920380E09 +++$+++ I had nothing to do with the assignment of categories.  Do as you think is best.  However, Catholic is a proper noun, and should always be capitalized, as should Aarti's name.  It's also customary to add a heading when you start a new section, and to write in full words, not \"text-speak\".  You're not writing text messages here.  You're writing to an encyclopedic standard and to be clearly understood.   +++$+++ : I had nothing to do with the assignment of categories.  Do as you think is best.  However, Catholic is a proper noun, and should always be capitalized, as should Aarti's name.  It's also customary to add a heading when you start a new section, and to write in full words, not "text-speak".  You're not writing text messages here.  You're writing to an encyclopedic standard and to be clearly understood.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 05:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

7395 +++$+++ Intoronto1125 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-09 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.302394080E09 +++$+++ I was not calling you out it seems like you took offense to it. I did not mean to offend you, rather point out your mistake.  +++$+++ I was not calling you out it seems like you took offense to it. I did not mean to offend you, rather point out your mistake. [[User:Intoronto1125|Intoronto1125]] ([[User talk:Intoronto1125|talk]]) 17:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
7396 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7395 +++$+++ 7395 +++$+++ 2011-04-10 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.302423480E09 +++$+++ As for doctoral study, advice?  Other than don't expect to have a life for at least five years?  Be darned sure it's what you want.  It will take over your life.  And learn to say no.  You'll have a tremendous number of opportunities come your way.  Learn to pick and choose so you don't overwhelm yourself.   +++$+++ : As for doctoral study, advice?  Other than don't expect to have a life for at least five years?  Be darned sure it's what you want.  It will take over your life.  And learn to say no.  You'll have a tremendous number of opportunities come your way.  Learn to pick and choose so you don't overwhelm yourself.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 01:18, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
7397 +++$+++ Intoronto1125 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7395 +++$+++ 7396 +++$+++ 2011-04-10 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.302424380E09 +++$+++ Well I am still considering it since i am in my first year, but I love what I am learning, so it is wide open at this point. Thanks for the advice. Are you a professor by any chance?  +++$+++ ::Well I am still considering it since i am in my first year, but I love what I am learning, so it is wide open at this point. Thanks for the advice. Are you a professor by any chance? [[User:Intoronto1125|Intoronto1125]] ([[User talk:Intoronto1125|talk]]) 01:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
7398 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7395 +++$+++ 7397 +++$+++ 2011-04-10 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.302424800E09 +++$+++ I am.  You're in for a big adventure.  I had a ball doing my doc program.  Good luck with your studies!   +++$+++ ::: I am.  You're in for a big adventure.  I had a ball doing my doc program.  Good luck with your studies!  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 01:40, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
7399 +++$+++ Intoronto1125 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7395 +++$+++ 7398 +++$+++ 2011-04-10 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.302427980E09 +++$+++ Thank you it does mean a lot.  +++$+++ ::::Thank you it does mean a lot. [[User:Intoronto1125|Intoronto1125]] ([[User talk:Intoronto1125|talk]]) 02:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

531685 +++$+++ Savolya +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-29 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.230574200E09 +++$+++ [[User:Savolya|Savolya]] ([[User talk:Savolya|talk]]) 10:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)savolya +++$+++ [[User:Savolya|Savolya]] ([[User talk:Savolya|talk]]) 10:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)savolya[[User:Savolya|Savolya]] ([[User talk:Savolya|talk]]) 10:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
531686 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531685 +++$+++ 531685 +++$+++ 2008-12-31 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.230713040E09 +++$+++ Replied on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASavolya&diff=260794557&oldid=260682021 Savolya's talk page].  +++$+++ :Replied on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASavolya&diff=260794557&oldid=260682021 Savolya's talk page]. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 00:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

7400 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-09 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.302398280E09 +++$+++ Just fyi, Re: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Robert_Irvine&diff=423169521&oldid=423164525 this], see [[WP:TPO]], Section headings. :)   +++$+++ Just fyi, Re: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Robert_Irvine&diff=423169521&oldid=423164525 this], see [[WP:TPO]], Section headings. :)  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 18:18, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
7401 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7400 +++$+++ 7400 +++$+++ 2011-04-10 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.302423600E09 +++$+++ Oh, you're right.  It was just 6:30 am on a Saturday and I was ''annoyed''. --  +++$+++ : Oh, you're right.  It was just 6:30 am on a Saturday and I was ''annoyed''. -- [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 01:20, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
7402 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7400 +++$+++ 7401 +++$+++ 2011-04-10 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.302427020E09 +++$+++ I totally [[grok|comprehend]] that feeling.  I really do.   +++$+++ ::I totally [[grok|comprehend]] that feeling.  I really do.  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 02:17, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
7403 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7400 +++$+++ 7402 +++$+++ 2011-04-10 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.302437520E09 +++$+++ I can see why you might of late.  Thanks for the back-up!  +++$+++ ::: I can see why you might of late.  Thanks for the back-up! [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 05:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

531690 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-30 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.230678120E09 +++$+++ Well, there has to be a consensus before a close can be made. Sorry for the inconvenience, but a second relist was necessary. Cheers, &ndash; +++$+++ Well, there has to be a consensus before a close can be made. Sorry for the inconvenience, but a second relist was necessary. Cheers, &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 15:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
531691 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531690 +++$+++ 531690 +++$+++ 2008-12-31 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.230713040E09 +++$+++ Replied on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJuliancolton&diff=260992378&oldid=260942126 Juliancolton's talk page].  +++$+++ :Replied on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJuliancolton&diff=260992378&oldid=260942126 Juliancolton's talk page]. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 00:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
531692 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531690 +++$+++ 531690 +++$+++ 2008-12-31 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.230725820E09 +++$+++ Happy to help. It's often a problem for newly registered users because until a user is [[WP:AUTOCONFIRMED|autoconfirmed]] (either by the account being over 4 days old or making 10 edits), they won't see the \"Move\" tab at the top of the page. But now you know for next time. I'll put a welcome message on your talk page with some links you might find useful - it's difficult to understand how everything works on here, especially straight away! :)  +++$+++ :Happy to help. It's often a problem for newly registered users because until a user is [[WP:AUTOCONFIRMED|autoconfirmed]] (either by the account being over 4 days old or making 10 edits), they won't see the "Move" tab at the top of the page. But now you know for next time. I'll put a welcome message on your talk page with some links you might find useful - it's difficult to understand how everything works on here, especially straight away! :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 04:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
531693 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531690 +++$+++ 531690 +++$+++ 2009-01-03 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.231004400E09 +++$+++ Hi Bashish. You're correct, I do have little information about Gwalior. That's why, to me, both the articles seemed to be about the same institute. Thank you for clarifying that. If you have any questions, please let me know.  +++$+++ :Hi Bashish. You're correct, I do have little information about Gwalior. That's why, to me, both the articles seemed to be about the same institute. Thank you for clarifying that. If you have any questions, please let me know. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 09:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

269547 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-24 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.235474460E09 +++$+++ There have been six Saxbe fixes executed and all have been for cabinet positions.  A seventh should be on the way for Solis also a cabinet position.  Judges have been considered in relation to the clause, but alternative nominees have always been put forward.  The clause pertains to judges.  Judges are civil officers.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ There have been six Saxbe fixes executed and all have been for cabinet positions.  A seventh should be on the way for Solis also a cabinet position.  Judges have been considered in relation to the clause, but alternative nominees have always been put forward.  The clause pertains to judges.  Judges are civil officers.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 03:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
269548 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269547 +++$+++ 269547 +++$+++ 2009-02-24 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.235474640E09 +++$+++ I could have sworn you had a paragraph on several who served as judges and legislators during Washington's time. Maybe it was in one of your sources, like Meese.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I could have sworn you had a paragraph on several who served as judges and legislators during Washington's time. Maybe it was in one of your sources, like Meese.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

7404 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-26 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.303804800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your note Drmargi. I have done that \"what does spell check want this word to be\" a time or two myself. In this case I looked at the word in the editing field, when I hit Show preview, after I had saved it and missed my error all three times. It wasn't til I looked at the reply that it came leaping out at me. I wanted to blame the spell check but you know the old adage about a workman blaming his tools :-) Glad you got a chuckle out of it. Cheers and happy editing.  +++$+++ Thanks for your note Drmargi. I have done that "what does spell check want this word to be" a time or two myself. In this case I looked at the word in the editing field, when I hit Show preview, after I had saved it and missed my error all three times. It wasn't til I looked at the reply that it came leaping out at me. I wanted to blame the spell check but you know the old adage about a workman blaming his tools :-) Glad you got a chuckle out of it. Cheers and happy editing. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 01:00, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
7405 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7404 +++$+++ 7404 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.305285480E09 +++$+++ That's all well and good, but this discussion should be on the article talk page, not here.  Please review [[WP:BRD]].   +++$+++ : That's all well and good, but this discussion should be on the article talk page, not here.  Please review [[WP:BRD]].  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 04:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

269549 +++$+++ Jmh649 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-24 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.235545860E09 +++$+++ Thanks -- +++$+++ Thanks --[[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 23:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
269550 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269549 +++$+++ 269549 +++$+++ 2009-02-25 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.235549640E09 +++$+++ If the reviewer fails the article, I would recommend the [[WP:GAR|Good article reassessment]]. Especially if you draw attention to the problem via [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations]] or [[User:Geometry guy]], that process should go fast.  &mdash; +++$+++ :If the reviewer fails the article, I would recommend the [[WP:GAR|Good article reassessment]]. Especially if you draw attention to the problem via [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations]] or [[User:Geometry guy]], that process should go fast.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
269551 +++$+++ Jmh649 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269549 +++$+++ 269550 +++$+++ 2009-02-25 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.235559720E09 +++$+++ Thank.  I think he might have just missed a number of the reference I have added.-- +++$+++ ::Thank.  I think he might have just missed a number of the reference I have added.--[[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 03:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

7406 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7406 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-21 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.306022100E09 +++$+++ Hello Drmargi. I thought something wasn't quite right about what was going on with the various moves regarding Prime Suspect but they were getting too confusing for me to follow. Thus, I appreciate the time you took to post on the talk page for the disambig article. On a lighter note I thought that the TNT series ''The Closer'' already was the US version of PS. I also can't imagine that this new series will have any of the gripping impact of the UK one - even if they can find someone as good as Helen Mirren. Thanks again and enjoy the rest of your weekend.  +++$+++ Hello Drmargi. I thought something wasn't quite right about what was going on with the various moves regarding Prime Suspect but they were getting too confusing for me to follow. Thus, I appreciate the time you took to post on the talk page for the disambig article. On a lighter note I thought that the TNT series ''The Closer'' already was the US version of PS. I also can't imagine that this new series will have any of the gripping impact of the UK one - even if they can find someone as good as Helen Mirren. Thanks again and enjoy the rest of your weekend. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 16:55, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
7407 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7406 +++$+++ 7406 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.306022580E09 +++$+++ No problem, and I agree about the mess created!  I still have to post on the talk page of the guy who made the moves, but that series of moves should never have been done without discussion.  I didn't want to mess with too much, but at least fixed the U.S. version.  No argument about ''The Closer''.  James Duff denies it, and the lead was originally male, but it must have been some sort of inspiration.  You could almost match characters 1-1 the first season.  The new version has Maria Bello in the Tennison role (Jane Timoney).  Good actress, bad choice for the role.  I've seen a couple clips that are so-so.  But we'll give it a chance.  Enjoy your weekend as well, unless the Rapture gets there first.   +++$+++ : No problem, and I agree about the mess created!  I still have to post on the talk page of the guy who made the moves, but that series of moves should never have been done without discussion.  I didn't want to mess with too much, but at least fixed the U.S. version.  No argument about ''The Closer''.  James Duff denies it, and the lead was originally male, but it must have been some sort of inspiration.  You could almost match characters 1-1 the first season.  The new version has Maria Bello in the Tennison role (Jane Timoney).  Good actress, bad choice for the role.  I've seen a couple clips that are so-so.  But we'll give it a chance.  Enjoy your weekend as well, unless the Rapture gets there first.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 17:03, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
7408 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7406 +++$+++ 7407 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.306041720E09 +++$+++ Hi again. If you enjoyed PS I am wondering if you also watched the Robbie Coltrane series ''Cracker''. If you did then you might be interested in this [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=7s8uxq7sfBo] skit that he and Mirren performed for Comic Relief one year. When both of these were airing - in the mid 90's for us US viewers - I mentioned to more than one friend that I wished that they would do a crossover episode. Lo and behold they (sort of) did and it is a real hoot. Of course, you may have already seen this but I thought that I would make you aware of it in case you hadn't. Cheers  +++$+++ ::Hi again. If you enjoyed PS I am wondering if you also watched the Robbie Coltrane series ''Cracker''. If you did then you might be interested in this [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s8uxq7sfBo] skit that he and Mirren performed for Comic Relief one year. When both of these were airing - in the mid 90's for us US viewers - I mentioned to more than one friend that I wished that they would do a crossover episode. Lo and behold they (sort of) did and it is a real hoot. Of course, you may have already seen this but I thought that I would make you aware of it in case you hadn't. Cheers [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 22:22, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
7409 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7406 +++$+++ 7408 +++$+++ 2011-05-22 08:50:00 +++$+++ 1.306079400E09 +++$+++ Oh, my lordy that's hilarious!  I love both Cracker and PS, so it's perfect for me.  Thanks for sharing it.  I have a chum who follows Red Nose Day avidly, and she hadn't seen it either, so I passed it along.  Good stuff!  +++$+++ ::: Oh, my lordy that's hilarious!  I love both Cracker and PS, so it's perfect for me.  Thanks for sharing it.  I have a chum who follows Red Nose Day avidly, and she hadn't seen it either, so I passed it along.  Good stuff! [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 08:50, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
7410 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7406 +++$+++ 7409 +++$+++ 2011-05-22 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.306116540E09 +++$+++ Glad you enjoyed it. I had read about this a few years ago but, at that time, it wasn't posted anywhere. Thank goodness for youtube so that we could finally see it. It was also fun seeing Pete Postlethwaite. His passing was a sad day. I'm also glad that your friend got to see it.  +++$+++ ::::Glad you enjoyed it. I had read about this a few years ago but, at that time, it wasn't posted anywhere. Thank goodness for youtube so that we could finally see it. It was also fun seeing Pete Postlethwaite. His passing was a sad day. I'm also glad that your friend got to see it. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 19:09, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

269552 +++$+++ BanyanTree +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-28 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.235847420E09 +++$+++ Please see my response at [[Template talk:Did you know#Gersony Report]].  I am gob-smacked by the credibility challenge here - not that the findings were correct or not, but that the findings are asserted to exist. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your words.  +++$+++ Please see my response at [[Template talk:Did you know#Gersony Report]].  I am gob-smacked by the credibility challenge here - not that the findings were correct or not, but that the findings are asserted to exist. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your words. [[User:BanyanTree|Banyan]][[User talk:BanyanTree|Tree]] 10:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
269553 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269552 +++$+++ 269552 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.235857200E09 +++$+++ The Prunier book, to which I do not have access, verifies the trip was actually made and it is used as a source on what others said the findings were. However, apparently Prunier does not address the issue of whether there was a written report. Most of the rest of the article is sourced to \"Human Rights Watch (1999)\" and \"Purported 14 October 1994 [http:\/\/webpages.charter.net\/jabdmb\/Gersony1.PDF cable from Shaharyar Khan to Annan and Goulding, subject heading \"The Gersoni 'Report' Rwanda\"], hosted by webpages.charter.net (Alternative [http:\/\/www.rwasta.net\/fileadmin\/user_upload\/dossiers\/2008-Critique-Rapport-Mucyo-documents-annexes\/19941014-DK112-Gersony%20Report.pdf copy] at rwasta.net)\". This is not enough information for these to quality as [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. The statement: \"The contents of Gersony's findings were leaked to the international press, infuriating the RPF government\" is sourced by the ''New York Times'' refers to a \"report\" and does not specify that the \"report\" was unwritten. Nor does the last source, as far as I can tell: Lieutenant Colonel Thomas P. Odom USA (ret.),{{PDFlink|[http:\/\/smallwarsjournal.com\/documents\/swjvol5.pdf \"Guerrillas From the Mist: A Defense Attach\xe9 Watches the Rwandan Patriotic Front Transform from Insurgent to Counter Insurgent\"]}}, ''Small Wars Journal'' Volume 5, July 2006, p. 6-7. Reviews of the Prunier book say it is confusing to anyone without in depth knowledge of the Rwanda situation, and perhaps that is the case with this article. The sources verify that there was a free lance consultant hired by the U.N. to go to Rwanda and that the trip resulted in controversial \"findings\". However, whether nothing was ever put into \"writing\" is not verified, as far as I could tell. Are you saying it was all word of mouth?  &mdash; +++$+++ :The Prunier book, to which I do not have access, verifies the trip was actually made and it is used as a source on what others said the findings were. However, apparently Prunier does not address the issue of whether there was a written report. Most of the rest of the article is sourced to "Human Rights Watch (1999)" and "Purported 14 October 1994 [http://webpages.charter.net/jabdmb/Gersony1.PDF cable from Shaharyar Khan to Annan and Goulding, subject heading "The Gersoni 'Report' Rwanda"], hosted by webpages.charter.net (Alternative [http://www.rwasta.net/fileadmin/user_upload/dossiers/2008-Critique-Rapport-Mucyo-documents-annexes/19941014-DK112-Gersony%20Report.pdf copy] at rwasta.net)". This is not enough information for these to quality as [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. The statement: "The contents of Gersony's findings were leaked to the international press, infuriating the RPF government" is sourced by the ''New York Times'' refers to a "report" and does not specify that the "report" was unwritten. Nor does the last source, as far as I can tell: Lieutenant Colonel Thomas P. Odom USA (ret.),{{PDFlink|[http://smallwarsjournal.com/documents/swjvol5.pdf "Guerrillas From the Mist: A Defense Attaché Watches the Rwandan Patriotic Front Transform from Insurgent to Counter Insurgent"]}}, ''Small Wars Journal'' Volume 5, July 2006, p. 6-7. Reviews of the Prunier book say it is confusing to anyone without in depth knowledge of the Rwanda situation, and perhaps that is the case with this article. The sources verify that there was a free lance consultant hired by the U.N. to go to Rwanda and that the trip resulted in controversial "findings". However, whether nothing was ever put into "writing" is not verified, as far as I could tell. Are you saying it was all word of mouth?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
269554 +++$+++ BanyanTree +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269552 +++$+++ 269553 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.235861280E09 +++$+++ Getting back to the hook, would \"... that the \"''''[[Gersony Report]]'''\", the controversial finding by [[United Nations]] contractors that [[Rwandan Patriotic Front|the new government]] in [[Rwandan Genocide|post-genocide]] [[Rwanda]] had carried out systematic killings of civilians, was never <u>released<\/u>?\" be acceptable? -  +++$+++ ::Getting back to the hook, would "... that the "''''[[Gersony Report]]'''", the controversial finding by [[United Nations]] contractors that [[Rwandan Patriotic Front|the new government]] in [[Rwandan Genocide|post-genocide]] [[Rwanda]] had carried out systematic killings of civilians, was never <u>released</u>?" be acceptable? - [[User:BanyanTree|Banyan]][[User talk:BanyanTree|Tree]] 14:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
269555 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269552 +++$+++ 269554 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.235862840E09 +++$+++ Perhaps, \"never formally released\"? And actually, that is unclear. Released to whom? The consultants were contracted to make a trip and undoubtedly they reported something to the UN, if the UN hired them. Consultants have to provide something in order to get paid usually.  The article is very confusing. So, you are saying that the UN never released anything? (I would have to go back through the article and sources to clarify.) And are they obligated to release such \"reports\" always? Also, make sure whatever you do put in the hook is sourced by a reliable source. &mdash; +++$+++ :::Perhaps, "never formally released"? And actually, that is unclear. Released to whom? The consultants were contracted to make a trip and undoubtedly they reported something to the UN, if the UN hired them. Consultants have to provide something in order to get paid usually.  The article is very confusing. So, you are saying that the UN never released anything? (I would have to go back through the article and sources to clarify.) And are they obligated to release such "reports" always? Also, make sure whatever you do put in the hook is sourced by a reliable source. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
269556 +++$+++ BanyanTree +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269552 +++$+++ 269555 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.235868240E09 +++$+++ I'm really at a loss about how to clarify the article in a way that doesn't create false confidence in facts that would be controversial even if they were discussed openly, as opposed to having another layer of controversy on if the report exists and if the purported findings of that report say what people think it says.  I'm not surprised some book reviews report confusion. -  +++$+++ ::::I'm really at a loss about how to clarify the article in a way that doesn't create false confidence in facts that would be controversial even if they were discussed openly, as opposed to having another layer of controversy on if the report exists and if the purported findings of that report say what people think it says.  I'm not surprised some book reviews report confusion. - [[User:BanyanTree|Banyan]][[User talk:BanyanTree|Tree]] 16:44, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
269557 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269552 +++$+++ 269556 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.235869020E09 +++$+++ Well, one way is to rely completely on your sources. \"As related by XYX, Gersony did such and such. However, a conflicting version says that ABC actually happened instead.\" It is not up to you to reconcile conflicting reports. You just describe what the sources say happened, giving more weight to the more reliable sources rather than the advocacy group or information they put forth. I think all the qualifications in your lead are  [[WP:WTA|Words to avoid]], unless specifically sourced,  and could be called [[WP:OR|Original research]].  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Well, one way is to rely completely on your sources. "As related by XYX, Gersony did such and such. However, a conflicting version says that ABC actually happened instead." It is not up to you to reconcile conflicting reports. You just describe what the sources say happened, giving more weight to the more reliable sources rather than the advocacy group or information they put forth. I think all the qualifications in your lead are  [[WP:WTA|Words to avoid]], unless specifically sourced,  and could be called [[WP:OR|Original research]].  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
269558 +++$+++ BanyanTree +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269552 +++$+++ 269557 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.235870100E09 +++$+++ I have changed the proposed hook.  Have your concerns about the accuracy of the hook been addressed? It's running off the end of the queue... -  +++$+++ ::::::I have changed the proposed hook.  Have your concerns about the accuracy of the hook been addressed? It's running off the end of the queue... - [[User:BanyanTree|Banyan]][[User talk:BanyanTree|Tree]] 17:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
269559 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269552 +++$+++ 269558 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.235870700E09 +++$+++ The hook needs to be able to be found within the article, either in the lead, or in some other easily recognizable place, and it needs to be sourced.  I can't find the hook in the article.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::The hook needs to be able to be found within the article, either in the lead, or in some other easily recognizable place, and it needs to be sourced.  I can't find the hook in the article.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

531697 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531697 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.232876820E09 +++$+++ Hi Eustress, I just noticed that you failed the GA nomination for Canning Dam. I'm just wondering why? As far as I can see, the only two issues not addressed are that there were too many citations in the lead (which you said wasn't a big problem on [[User:Mdavies 965|Mdavies 965]]'s talk page), and that a caption needed to be slightly expanded? Mdavies 965 hasn't been online since you warned him the hold period's seven days were up, and seven days isn't a strict rule - you could've left it a little longer before failing to give him time to see your comment, since there were so few issues? You could've even fixed those two issues yourself in order to pass it - it's not a requirement of GA reviewing to fix the article, of course, but GA reviewers can make little adjustments and improve the article too. Anyway, just wondering and I thought I'd ask. (If I'd seen it was on hold, I'd have fixed it myself, but I only noticed it after the fact.) Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Eustress, I just noticed that you failed the GA nomination for Canning Dam. I'm just wondering why? As far as I can see, the only two issues not addressed are that there were too many citations in the lead (which you said wasn't a big problem on [[User:Mdavies 965|Mdavies 965]]'s talk page), and that a caption needed to be slightly expanded? Mdavies 965 hasn't been online since you warned him the hold period's seven days were up, and seven days isn't a strict rule - you could've left it a little longer before failing to give him time to see your comment, since there were so few issues? You could've even fixed those two issues yourself in order to pass it - it's not a requirement of GA reviewing to fix the article, of course, but GA reviewers can make little adjustments and improve the article too. Anyway, just wondering and I thought I'd ask. (If I'd seen it was on hold, I'd have fixed it myself, but I only noticed it after the fact.) Thanks, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno|talk]]) 01:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
531698 +++$+++ Eustress +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531697 +++$+++ 531697 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.232878200E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you're right, but it is the nominating editor's duty to oversee the GAN, and at least he\/she was aware of the deadline, as we discussed part of the review via talk page. The article can easily be renominated, and I would be happy to conduct an expedited follow-up review if so petitioned. -- +++$+++ :Perhaps you're right, but it is the nominating editor's duty to oversee the GAN, and at least he/she was aware of the deadline, as we discussed part of the review via talk page. The article can easily be renominated, and I would be happy to conduct an expedited follow-up review if so petitioned. --[[User:Eustress|Eustress]] ([[User talk:Eustress|talk]]) 02:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
531699 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531697 +++$+++ 531698 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.232882400E09 +++$+++ Replied on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEustress&diff=266242033&oldid=266232085 Eustress's talk page].  +++$+++ ::Replied on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEustress&diff=266242033&oldid=266232085 Eustress's talk page]. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

525523 +++$+++ 75.44.207.24 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-21 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.193033160E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:75.44.207.24|75.44.207.24]] 23:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
525524 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525523 +++$+++ 525523 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.193043660E09 +++$+++ A general overview to your questions is available at [[Wikipedia:Administrators]]. I only see two edits under your IP address, so I can't tell which specific page reversion you're concerned about. Which page were you trying to edit? -- +++$+++ :A general overview to your questions is available at [[Wikipedia:Administrators]]. I only see two edits under your IP address, so I can't tell which specific page reversion you're concerned about. Which page were you trying to edit? --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 02:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
525525 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525523 +++$+++ 525523 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.193296800E09 +++$+++ I commend you for your work with charitable organizations. Please review [[Wikipedia:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided]], [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(medicine-related_articles)#External_links]], and [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]]. If, after reading those pages, you still feel that links to http:\/\/www.haileyswish.org\/ should still be added, the best place to propose its inclusion would probably be at [[Talk:Mitochondrial disease]]. -- +++$+++ :I commend you for your work with charitable organizations. Please review [[Wikipedia:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided]], [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(medicine-related_articles)#External_links]], and [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]]. If, after reading those pages, you still feel that links to http://www.haileyswish.org/ should still be added, the best place to propose its inclusion would probably be at [[Talk:Mitochondrial disease]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 00:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

7412 +++$+++ Logical Fuzz +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7412 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-22 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.306095000E09 +++$+++ Hi Drmargi.  I know you are really good with style\/grammar, so you were the first person I thought of when I didn't find the answer I wanted via brief Google search. Regarding TV show articles, is the word \"fall\" capitalized, as in ''\"It will premiere in Fall 2011\"''? I know that when you phrase it ''\"in the fall\"'', it is decapped. I keep having the urge to decapitalize the word, but have refrained because I wasn't sure.  I did find this in the MOS: [[WP:Capitalization#Calendar_items]], but it didn't help me. :\/ Any insight into this?  Thanks. -- +++$+++ Hi Drmargi.  I know you are really good with style/grammar, so you were the first person I thought of when I didn't find the answer I wanted via brief Google search. Regarding TV show articles, is the word "fall" capitalized, as in ''"It will premiere in Fall 2011"''? I know that when you phrase it ''"in the fall"'', it is decapped. I keep having the urge to decapitalize the word, but have refrained because I wasn't sure.  I did find this in the MOS: [[WP:Capitalization#Calendar_items]], but it didn't help me. :/ Any insight into this?  Thanks. --[[User:Logical Fuzz|Logical Fuzz]] ([[User talk:Logical Fuzz|talk]]) 13:10, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
7413 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7412 +++$+++ 7412 +++$+++ 2011-05-22 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.306106700E09 +++$+++ Technically, it's a common noun and not capitalized. However, I think it should be at times, although it's probably more a matter of taste than a hard-and-fast rule.  For example, when we use it to label the Fall television season (which might go another noun, as in the MOS), I believe we're treating it as a proper noun, and it's correct to capitalize it, as you suggest.  Otherwise, we use it as a common noun and shouldn't be capitalized.  Funnily enough, I have the same argument with myself all the time when I write about academic terms (i.e. fall semester) and when they should be capitalized.  Hope that helps!  +++$+++ : Technically, it's a common noun and not capitalized. However, I think it should be at times, although it's probably more a matter of taste than a hard-and-fast rule.  For example, when we use it to label the Fall television season (which might go another noun, as in the MOS), I believe we're treating it as a proper noun, and it's correct to capitalize it, as you suggest.  Otherwise, we use it as a common noun and shouldn't be capitalized.  Funnily enough, I have the same argument with myself all the time when I write about academic terms (i.e. fall semester) and when they should be capitalized.  Hope that helps! [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 16:25, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

531702 +++$+++ Essin +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.232925180E09 +++$+++ I've responded to your message on [[user talk:Essin|my talk page]]. {{Don't template the regulars}}  +++$+++ I've responded to your message on [[user talk:Essin|my talk page]]. {{Don't template the regulars}} [[User:Essin|Essin]] ([[User talk:Essin|talk]]) 15:13, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
531703 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531702 +++$+++ 531702 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.232959140E09 +++$+++ Responded on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEssin&diff=266423991&oldid=266322525 Essin's talk page].  +++$+++ :Responded on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEssin&diff=266423991&oldid=266322525 Essin's talk page]. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 00:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

7415 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7415 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-27 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.306495980E09 +++$+++ Would you mind looking over and possibly rating a couple new articles I've created?  I want to make sure I didn't miss anything, and have a third party read over and fix anything I may have done wrong.  The articles can be found at ''[[Burn Notice: The Fall of Sam Axe]]'' and \"[[Pilot (White Collar)|Pilot (''White Collar'')]]\".  Thanks!   +++$+++ Would you mind looking over and possibly rating a couple new articles I've created?  I want to make sure I didn't miss anything, and have a third party read over and fix anything I may have done wrong.  The articles can be found at ''[[Burn Notice: The Fall of Sam Axe]]'' and "[[Pilot (White Collar)|Pilot (''White Collar'')]]".  Thanks!  [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 04:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
7416 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7415 +++$+++ 7415 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 10:06:00 +++$+++ 1.306515960E09 +++$+++ Sure! I'm not sure how to rate them; isn't that something a TV project member does?  I'm happy to learn how if it's appropriate.   +++$+++ : Sure! I'm not sure how to rate them; isn't that something a TV project member does?  I'm happy to learn how if it's appropriate.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 10:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
7417 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7415 +++$+++ 7416 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.306543740E09 +++$+++ I think it is, but I believe it's already been done on these two articles.  Thanks, though!   +++$+++ :: I think it is, but I believe it's already been done on these two articles.  Thanks, though!  [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 17:49, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

269560 +++$+++ LifeStroke420 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-28 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.235878200E09 +++$+++ Thats not how it works if the source doesnt meet wikipedia standards besides that you can go on the source and it says in the opening paragraph he is biased on his ranking. If you think it should be put back in then try discussing it on the page maybe somebody will take your cause up but until they we dont add information without a VALID source. +++$+++ Thats not how it works if the source doesnt meet wikipedia standards besides that you can go on the source and it says in the opening paragraph he is biased on his ranking. If you think it should be put back in then try discussing it on the page maybe somebody will take your cause up but until they we dont add information without a VALID source.[[User:LifeStroke420|LifeStroke420]] ([[User talk:LifeStroke420|talk]]) 19:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
269561 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269560 +++$+++ 269560 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.235883420E09 +++$+++ Replied on your talk page.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Replied on your talk page.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

7418 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-30 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.306811880E09 +++$+++ I thought the series had finished for the year? \u2190 +++$+++ I thought the series had finished for the year? ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 20:18, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
7419 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7418 +++$+++ 7418 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.306812060E09 +++$+++ It has.  Was there a concern?   +++$+++ : It has.  Was there a concern?  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 20:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
7420 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7418 +++$+++ 7419 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.306813320E09 +++$+++ There was a concern over the fact that supposedly the final show was still pending, overseas. I'm not sure if that's still the case, or if it even matters. But it might. However, if the show has run its course elsewhere, there's no problem that I can think of. \u2190 +++$+++ ::There was a concern over the fact that supposedly the final show was still pending, overseas. I'm not sure if that's still the case, or if it even matters. But it might. However, if the show has run its course elsewhere, there's no problem that I can think of. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 20:42, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
7421 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7418 +++$+++ 7420 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.306819260E09 +++$+++ It doesn't matter if it is.  [[WP:SPOILER]] covers inclusion of episode details, and folks from overseas need to exercise some personal responsibility before reading the article.   +++$+++ ::: It doesn't matter if it is.  [[WP:SPOILER]] covers inclusion of episode details, and folks from overseas need to exercise some personal responsibility before reading the article.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 22:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
7422 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7418 +++$+++ 7421 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.306820640E09 +++$+++ You're right. I was just confused. Feel free to zap this whole section. :) \u2190 +++$+++ ::::You're right. I was just confused. Feel free to zap this whole section. :) ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 22:44, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

269563 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269563 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-28 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.235881140E09 +++$+++ When you get a chance, I've started the discussion at [[Talk:Rudolf Wolters]] as to whether we think we are ready for FAC.  I think we might as well put it up and see who salutes.  Maybe some of the Speer magic will rub off on Wolters.  Unhappily, the Lane nom failed due to lack of consensus, there were no opposes, but only one support after a month, and I'm considering my options there.-- +++$+++ When you get a chance, I've started the discussion at [[Talk:Rudolf Wolters]] as to whether we think we are ready for FAC.  I think we might as well put it up and see who salutes.  Maybe some of the Speer magic will rub off on Wolters.  Unhappily, the Lane nom failed due to lack of consensus, there were no opposes, but only one support after a month, and I'm considering my options there.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 20:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
269564 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269563 +++$+++ 269563 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.235882400E09 +++$+++ Sorry about the Lane article. Go for [[Rudolf Wolters]]! A different kettle of fish.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Sorry about the Lane article. Go for [[Rudolf Wolters]]! A different kettle of fish.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
269565 +++$+++ Risker +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269563 +++$+++ 269564 +++$+++ 2009-03-18 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.237370340E09 +++$+++ Response [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARisker&diff=278022960&oldid=277998030:The last person who ranted on my page about the passive voice was Geogre, who regularly rants about it; to be honest, I didn't really look at the signature and just assumed...  +++$+++ **Response [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARisker&diff=278022960&oldid=277998030:The last person who ranted on my page about the passive voice was Geogre, who regularly rants about it; to be honest, I didn't really look at the signature and just assumed... [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker#top|talk]]) 02:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
269566 +++$+++ Mackensen +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269563 +++$+++ 269565 +++$+++ 2009-03-18 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.237364100E09 +++$+++ (another post)http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Risker&diff=next&oldid=277998030 I figured he was, and dropped Geogre a suitably cryptic note in that connection about two years ago [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Geogre&diff=prev&oldid=120247604]. Given the response I decided that (a) I was probably mistaken and (b) I really didn't care that much.  +++$+++ ***(another post)http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Risker&diff=next&oldid=277998030 I figured he was, and dropped Geogre a suitably cryptic note in that connection about two years ago [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Geogre&diff=prev&oldid=120247604]. Given the response I decided that (a) I was probably mistaken and (b) I really didn't care that much. [[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]] 01:15, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
269567 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269563 +++$+++ 269563 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.239177600E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Search?search=Ottava+Rima&prefix=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27+noticeboard%2FIncidentArchive&fulltext=Search+Incident+archives&fulltext=Search OR is rarely at Ani!] &mdash; +++$+++ *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Ottava+Rima&prefix=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27+noticeboard%2FIncidentArchive&fulltext=Search+Incident+archives&fulltext=Search OR is rarely at Ani!] &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

531708 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-01 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.233493740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 05:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
531709 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531708 +++$+++ 531708 +++$+++ 2009-02-01 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.233494340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the hints Gramps. ;) Ah, the olden days... That was a time when I just read the encyclopedia and it solved a lot of trivial arguments with friends and co-workers, without me realising that there were arguments going on behind the scenes.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the hints Gramps. ;) Ah, the olden days... That was a time when I just read the encyclopedia and it solved a lot of trivial arguments with friends and co-workers, without me realising that there were arguments going on behind the scenes. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 05:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

7423 +++$+++ Boycool42 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7423 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-07 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.307473200E09 +++$+++ I've been working on the article for the ''Chuck'' pilot, \"[[Chuck Versus the Intersect]]\", and would like to nominate it for GA or FA eventually. But I know how long that process can take. Would you mind looking over the article and correcting anything I missed or giving me advice on how to improve it (other than the fact that the last sentence is unsourced; if I can't find a reliable source, I'll just remove the statement)? Thanks! -- +++$+++ I've been working on the article for the ''Chuck'' pilot, "[[Chuck Versus the Intersect]]", and would like to nominate it for GA or FA eventually. But I know how long that process can take. Would you mind looking over the article and correcting anything I missed or giving me advice on how to improve it (other than the fact that the last sentence is unsourced; if I can't find a reliable source, I'll just remove the statement)? Thanks! --[[User:Boycool42|Boycool]] ([[User talk:Boycool42|talk]]) 12:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
7424 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7423 +++$+++ 7423 +++$+++ 2011-06-08 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.307575440E09 +++$+++ Sure!  It may be a few days before I can.  And do bear in mind, I don't watch Chuck, so I can't comment on accuracy of story points.  But that might also be helpful, because I can read it from an outsider's point of view.   +++$+++ :  Sure!  It may be a few days before I can.  And do bear in mind, I don't watch Chuck, so I can't comment on accuracy of story points.  But that might also be helpful, because I can read it from an outsider's point of view.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 16:24, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
7425 +++$+++ Boycool42 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7423 +++$+++ 7424 +++$+++ 2011-06-08 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.307576460E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I just need someone with experience on Wikipedia. -- +++$+++ ::Thank you. I just need someone with experience on Wikipedia. --[[User:Boycool42|Boycool]] ([[User talk:Boycool42|talk]]) 16:41, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

269568 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-02 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.235990640E09 +++$+++ Did you miss my clarification request?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ Did you miss my clarification request?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 02:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
269569 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269568 +++$+++ 269568 +++$+++ 2009-03-02 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.235991240E09 +++$+++ I don't think your position is valid. You are saying that, although the father can give his son a ride home, he is not allowed to ask his son if he wants a ride? He is not allowed to tell his son he has a flat tire? There is a reason why such quotations are not considered reliable sources for something like the NCAA rules. Find the NCAA rule book and quote it if you want to make  a statement that sounds so ridiculous.  That would be a reliable source.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I don't think your position is valid. You are saying that, although the father can give his son a ride home, he is not allowed to ask his son if he wants a ride? He is not allowed to tell his son he has a flat tire? There is a reason why such quotations are not considered reliable sources for something like the NCAA rules. Find the NCAA rule book and quote it if you want to make  a statement that sounds so ridiculous.  That would be a reliable source.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
269570 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269568 +++$+++ 269569 +++$+++ 2009-03-03 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.236097080E09 +++$+++ I am just seeing that you want me to quote the rule. I am going to go back digging.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::I am just seeing that you want me to quote the rule. I am going to go back digging.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 08:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

7426 +++$+++ 203.35.135.133 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-11 08:55:00 +++$+++ 1.307807700E09 +++$+++ On [[Spooks]]. [[Special:Contributions\/203.35.135.133|203.35.135.133]] ( +++$+++ On [[Spooks]]. [[Special:Contributions/203.35.135.133|203.35.135.133]] ([[User talk:203.35.135.133|talk]]) 08:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
7427 +++$+++ Duggy 1138 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7426 +++$+++ 7426 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.307961240E09 +++$+++ No opinion anymore?  +++$+++ : No opinion anymore? [[User:Duggy 1138|Duggy 1138]] ([[User talk:Duggy 1138|talk]]) 03:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
7428 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7426 +++$+++ 7427 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.307971140E09 +++$+++ I'll respond in my own time.  Your call is a vote, and consensus is not a vote.   +++$+++ :: I'll respond in my own time.  Your call is a vote, and consensus is not a vote.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 06:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
7429 +++$+++ Duggy 1138 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7426 +++$+++ 7428 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.307978040E09 +++$+++ What exactly is you problem with Lucas the article saying Lucas is dead?  It can't be because you don't want him to be dead, because you're a good editor who's done a lot of good work and know that our opinion  doesn't count.  It can't be that you're afraid that the makers may reverse it, that sort of thing can happen, but you know we can't pre-guess twists or changes.  It can't be that an interview on a DVD isn't reliable because it is.  It can't be because you believe that the previous reference to an earlier interview is better because it is seriously flawed.  So what is the problem you have?  +++$+++ ::: What exactly is you problem with Lucas the article saying Lucas is dead?  It can't be because you don't want him to be dead, because you're a good editor who's done a lot of good work and know that our opinion  doesn't count.  It can't be that you're afraid that the makers may reverse it, that sort of thing can happen, but you know we can't pre-guess twists or changes.  It can't be that an interview on a DVD isn't reliable because it is.  It can't be because you believe that the previous reference to an earlier interview is better because it is seriously flawed.  So what is the problem you have? [[User:Duggy 1138|Duggy 1138]] ([[User talk:Duggy 1138|talk]]) 08:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
7430 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7426 +++$+++ 7429 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.307996640E09 +++$+++ I haven't seen anything yet that establishes definitively that John Bateman is dead.  Yes, Armitage refers to Lucas being dead, but he means the real Lucas.  It's just that simple.  Do I think John Bateman is probably dead?  Yes, because I know Richard Armitage is in New Zealand making the Hobbit films, and because there's no way back for his character.  But I can't state that to an encyclopedic standard.  +++$+++ :::: I haven't seen anything yet that establishes definitively that John Bateman is dead.  Yes, Armitage refers to Lucas being dead, but he means the real Lucas.  It's just that simple.  Do I think John Bateman is probably dead?  Yes, because I know Richard Armitage is in New Zealand making the Hobbit films, and because there's no way back for his character.  But I can't state that to an encyclopedic standard. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 13:24, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
7431 +++$+++ Duggy 1138 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7426 +++$+++ 7430 +++$+++ 2011-06-14 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.308072180E09 +++$+++ No, he isn't refering to the original Lucas.  He is refering to his character's own death and the interview is intercut with the final scene on the roof.  You clearly have to seen the evidence and thus your opinion is flawed.  Sorry.  +++$+++ ::::: No, he isn't refering to the original Lucas.  He is refering to his character's own death and the interview is intercut with the final scene on the roof.  You clearly have to seen the evidence and thus your opinion is flawed.  Sorry. [[User:Duggy 1138|Duggy 1138]] ([[User talk:Duggy 1138|talk]]) 10:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
7432 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7426 +++$+++ 7431 +++$+++ 2011-06-14 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.308089400E09 +++$+++ Look at the video again.   +++$+++ :::::: Look at the video again.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 15:10, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
7433 +++$+++ Duggy 1138 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7426 +++$+++ 7432 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.308151260E09 +++$+++ I have.  A number of times.  I own the DVD.  It is not ambiguous.  It is not about the real-Lucas.  It is about John's confrontation with Harry.  Have you looked at the DVD?  +++$+++ :::::::   I have.  A number of times.  I own the DVD.  It is not ambiguous.  It is not about the real-Lucas.  It is about John's confrontation with Harry.  Have you looked at the DVD? [[User:Duggy 1138|Duggy 1138]] ([[User talk:Duggy 1138|talk]]) 08:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
7434 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7426 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 08:45:00 +++$+++ 1.308152700E09 +++$+++ This is pointless.  I don't know whether you're not reading my comments with care, or haven't watched the whole video, but I'm referring to an earlier comment, not the end.  Regardless, this discussion is over.   +++$+++ :::::::::  This is pointless.  I don't know whether you're not reading my comments with care, or haven't watched the whole video, but I'm referring to an earlier comment, not the end.  Regardless, this discussion is over.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 08:45, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
7435 +++$+++ Duggy 1138 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7426 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308154920E09 +++$+++ Who cares about an earlier statement?  The one being discussed is the one near the end.  The one I quoted on the discussion page.  That one clearly supports the fact that John is dead.  Which is the point.  I'm glad you've accepted that this has been decided and the discussion is over. +++$+++ ::::::::::  Who cares about an earlier statement?  The one being discussed is the one near the end.  The one I quoted on the discussion page.  That one clearly supports the fact that John is dead.  Which is the point.  I'm glad you've accepted that this has been decided and the discussion is over.[[User:Duggy 1138|Duggy 1138]] ([[User talk:Duggy 1138|talk]]) 09:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
7436 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7426 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-16 10:26:00 +++$+++ 1.308245160E09 +++$+++ I've addressed this on the show talk page, where this discussion belongs.   +++$+++ ::::::::::: I've addressed this on the show talk page, where this discussion belongs.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 10:26, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

612907 +++$+++ CBM +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612907 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-25 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.193361240E09 +++$+++ I meant to point out I posted about this template on WP:AN this morning: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#0RR_on_dominionism_template]. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>( +++$+++ I meant to point out I posted about this template on WP:AN this morning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#0RR_on_dominionism_template]. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 18:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
612908 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612907 +++$+++ 612907 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.193361480E09 +++$+++ There's continuing discussion, which I'd hope will reach consensus, if not unanimity. I've read it, and this is what I noticed \u2013 \"Take a common-sense approach. If an experienced editor who understands how collaborative editing works makes a mistake, a block is unlikely to do anything but alienate the editor, and is unproductive.\" . ...  +++$+++ :There's continuing discussion, which I'd hope will reach consensus, if not unanimity. I've read it, and this is what I noticed – "Take a common-sense approach. If an experienced editor who understands how collaborative editing works makes a mistake, a block is unlikely to do anything but alienate the editor, and is unproductive." . ... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
612909 +++$+++ CBM +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612907 +++$+++ 612908 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.193361960E09 +++$+++ Unless there is some impending harm that the protection is meant to address, I would like to unprotect the template. I'm watching it closely enough that the protection isn't needed to stop the edit war. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>( +++$+++ ::Unless there is some impending harm that the protection is meant to address, I would like to unprotect the template. I'm watching it closely enough that the protection isn't needed to stop the edit war. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 18:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
612910 +++$+++ CBM +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612907 +++$+++ 612909 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.193372640E09 +++$+++ Barring any compelling reasoning to keep the template protected, I'll unprotect it later tonight. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>( +++$+++ :::Barring any compelling reasoning to keep the template protected, I'll unprotect it later tonight. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 21:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

269573 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-04 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.236235680E09 +++$+++ I added refs to the article, and replied to your comment [[Template talk:Did you know#Force India VJM02|here]]. <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ I added refs to the article, and replied to your comment [[Template talk:Did you know#Force India VJM02|here]]. <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 22:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
269574 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269573 +++$+++ 269573 +++$+++ 2009-03-04 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.236236280E09 +++$+++ OK, I took care of it on DYK. &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, I took care of it on DYK. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
269575 +++$+++ Apterygial +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269573 +++$+++ 269574 +++$+++ 2009-03-04 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.236236820E09 +++$+++ Thanks. <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks. <font face="Impact">[[User:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">Aptery</font>]][[User talk:Apterygial|<font color="#006400">gial</font>]]</font> 23:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

531719 +++$+++ Deskana +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-07 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.234035480E09 +++$+++ Congratulations, I have closed your Request for Adminship as successful and you are now a sysop! If you have any questions about adminship, feel free to ask me. Please consider messaging me on IRC for access to the [[Wikipedia:IRC channels\/wikipedia-en-admins|#wikipedia-en-admins]] channel. Good luck! -- +++$+++ Congratulations, I have closed your Request for Adminship as successful and you are now a sysop! If you have any questions about adminship, feel free to ask me. Please consider messaging me on IRC for access to the [[Wikipedia:IRC channels/wikipedia-en-admins|#wikipedia-en-admins]] channel. Good luck! --[[User:Deskana|Deskana]] <small>[[User talk:Deskana|(talk)]]</small> 11:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531720 +++$+++ Chasingsol +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531719 +++$+++ 531719 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.234035660E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! Well deserved. -- +++$+++ :Congratulations! Well deserved. --[[User:Chasingsol|Chasingsol]][[User Talk:Chasingsol|<sup style="color:darkblue">(talk)</sup>]] 11:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531721 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531719 +++$+++ 531719 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.234035720E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Right as you were posting that, I noticed a bunch of new tab links at the top of the screen. :)  +++$+++ :Thanks! Right as you were posting that, I noticed a bunch of new tab links at the top of the screen. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 11:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531722 +++$+++ SoWhy +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531719 +++$+++ 531721 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.234035900E09 +++$+++ Congratulations, Somno, I am sure you will do a great job. Now it's time to head to [[WP:NAS]] and most importantly, choose which userbox you want to use. Someone will be around with your admin-shirt any minute, I just forgot where I left it... ;-) ''' +++$+++ ::Congratulations, Somno, I am sure you will do a great job. Now it's time to head to [[WP:NAS]] and most importantly, choose which userbox you want to use. Someone will be around with your admin-shirt any minute, I just forgot where I left it... ;-) '''[[User:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #AC0000">So</span>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #1F3F53">Why</span>]]''' 11:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531723 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531719 +++$+++ 531722 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.234036200E09 +++$+++ Ah yes, choosing a userbox. I must put everything else on hold and focus on the most important part of adminship! ;)  +++$+++ :::Ah yes, choosing a userbox. I must put everything else on hold and focus on the most important part of adminship! ;) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 11:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531724 +++$+++ Chasingsol +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531719 +++$+++ 531723 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.234036440E09 +++$+++ I thought getting an entry at [[Wikipedia:Village stocks|the super secret Cabal page]] was the most important part? I'm so confused... <sub>p.s. those buttons at the top are your ticket to infamy... use them wisely :)<\/sub>-- +++$+++ ::::I thought getting an entry at [[Wikipedia:Village stocks|the super secret Cabal page]] was the most important part? I'm so confused... <sub>p.s. those buttons at the top are your ticket to infamy... use them wisely :)</sub>--[[User:Chasingsol|Chasingsol]][[User Talk:Chasingsol|<sup style="color:darkblue">(talk)</sup>]] 11:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531725 +++$+++ Mazca +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531719 +++$+++ 531719 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.234037520E09 +++$+++ Congrats, I'm sure you'll do very well with the tools. Your RfA was agreeably low on the drama side too... as far as RfAs go, anyway! Best of luck. ~ <font color=\"#228b22\"> +++$+++ :Congrats, I'm sure you'll do very well with the tools. Your RfA was agreeably low on the drama side too... as far as RfAs go, anyway! Best of luck. ~ <font color="#228b22">[[User:Mazca|'''m'''a'''z'''c'''a''']]</font> <sup>[[User_talk:Mazca|'''t''']]|[[Special:Contributions/Mazca|'''c''']]</sup> 12:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531726 +++$+++ Tinucherian +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531719 +++$+++ 531725 +++$+++ 2009-02-09 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.234181580E09 +++$+++ '''Congratulations''' and Best wishes again --  +++$+++ :: '''Congratulations''' and Best wishes again -- [[User:Tinucherian|'''<em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> Tinu</em>''']] [[User talk:Tinucherian|'''<em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000">Cherian </em>''']] - 04:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
531727 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531719 +++$+++ 531726 +++$+++ 2009-02-14 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.234609080E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I'll go around to !voters' talk pages and thank everyone properly soon.  +++$+++ :::Thank you. I'll go around to !voters' talk pages and thank everyone properly soon. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

269577 +++$+++ Enigmaticanant +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-07 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.236418080E09 +++$+++ oh that'd be nice...no problem dude...go ahead. I hadnt heard of DYK till now...I, kind of, just edit on wikipedias. anyways, i havent removed that info...i hav just moved it below in the 'reception' section. thanks again -- +++$+++ oh that'd be nice...no problem dude...go ahead. I hadnt heard of DYK till now...I, kind of, just edit on wikipedias. anyways, i havent removed that info...i hav just moved it below in the 'reception' section. thanks again --[[User:Enigmaticanant|Anant Singh]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticanant|talk]]) 01:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
269578 +++$+++ Enigmaticanant +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269577 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.236420300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the nomination. And the info too. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :: Thanks for the nomination. And the info too. Regards, —[[User:Enigmaticanant|Anant Singh]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticanant|talk]]) 02:05, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
269579 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269577 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.236420480E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome! Regards,  &mdash; +++$+++ :::You are very welcome! Regards,  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

394455 +++$+++ Roaming27 +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394455 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.161951780E09 +++$+++ Anthony, thank you for your speedy help with this article :-) -- +++$+++ Anthony, thank you for your speedy help with this article :-) --[[User:Roaming27|Roaming27]] 05:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
394456 +++$+++ Anthony5429 +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394455 +++$+++ 394455 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.163243880E09 +++$+++ Sorry - will make note of this. -- +++$+++ :Sorry - will make note of this. --[[User:Anthony5429|Anthony5429]] 03:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

269580 +++$+++ Enigmaticanant +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269580 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-07 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.236482580E09 +++$+++ Hello Mattise,<br \/>I was just going through your edits in ''[[The Cloud Door]]'' and am quite happy with the way you have constructed the Indian Film Festival part and the controversy. But I'm not quite sure if this was Mani Kaul's first erotic film. This was definitely the first one to have on screen nudity, but then, eroticism need not necessarily mean to have nudity. I think he has made an erotic film before this too. I'll see if i can find out anything about it online. Regards, -- +++$+++ Hello Mattise,<br />I was just going through your edits in ''[[The Cloud Door]]'' and am quite happy with the way you have constructed the Indian Film Festival part and the controversy. But I'm not quite sure if this was Mani Kaul's first erotic film. This was definitely the first one to have on screen nudity, but then, eroticism need not necessarily mean to have nudity. I think he has made an erotic film before this too. I'll see if i can find out anything about it online. Regards, --[[User:Enigmaticanant|Anant Singh]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticanant|talk]]) 19:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
269581 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269580 +++$+++ 269580 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.236485220E09 +++$+++ The Ziegler reference that we are using  says \"For the first time, despite a treasury of native erotic art and literature, an Indian erotic film had been made by Mani Kaul, the aesthete among Indian filmmakers, and could be seen at the festival.\"[http:\/\/www.ziegler-film.com\/en\/pro\/prod.html?lang=EN&ID=193&CATEGORY=kino] Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :The Ziegler reference that we are using  says "For the first time, despite a treasury of native erotic art and literature, an Indian erotic film had been made by Mani Kaul, the aesthete among Indian filmmakers, and could be seen at the festival."[http://www.ziegler-film.com/en/pro/prod.html?lang=EN&ID=193&CATEGORY=kino] Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
269582 +++$+++ Enigmaticanant +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269580 +++$+++ 269581 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.236486000E09 +++$+++ Agreed the site says so, but there have been instances, where an erotic film WAS made in India, that too before The Cloud Door. The only film thats coming to my mind right now is [[Utsav]] (1984) which was based on a play by [[Bh\u0101sa]] and had [[V\u0101tsy\u0101yana]] (the author of ''[[Kama Sutra]]'') as a principal character in the film. The film was erotic, just without any on screen nudity displayed by any of the actors. So, its quite debatable.-- +++$+++ ::Agreed the site says so, but there have been instances, where an erotic film WAS made in India, that too before The Cloud Door. The only film thats coming to my mind right now is [[Utsav]] (1984) which was based on a play by [[Bhāsa]] and had [[Vātsyāyana]] (the author of ''[[Kama Sutra]]'') as a principal character in the film. The film was erotic, just without any on screen nudity displayed by any of the actors. So, its quite debatable.--[[User:Enigmaticanant|Anant Singh]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticanant|talk]]) 20:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
269583 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269580 +++$+++ 269582 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.236487920E09 +++$+++ But was it made by Mani Kaul? Also, remember, Wikipedias mission is [[WP:V|verifiability]] and not \"truth\". Unless you think the Ziegler site is unreliable, we can go with what we can find supported. In any case, we can reword it or remove it. We do need a reason to explain the threats of \"riot\" though.    &mdash; +++$+++ :::But was it made by Mani Kaul? Also, remember, Wikipedias mission is [[WP:V|verifiability]] and not "truth". Unless you think the Ziegler site is unreliable, we can go with what we can find supported. In any case, we can reword it or remove it. We do need a reason to explain the threats of "riot" though.    &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
269584 +++$+++ Enigmaticanant +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269580 +++$+++ 269583 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.236489600E09 +++$+++ what if we reword it and mention about the Indian censor laws which do not allow on-screen nudity at all? due to that law, political parties and its workers do create problems in the screening of a particular work of art - ''[[Bandit Queen]], [[Kama Sutra: A Tale of Love]], [[Fire (1996 film)|Fire]]'', [[M.F. Hussain]]'s paintings of nude godesses, etc.. If its against the \"law\" then obviously it gives a reason to explain the riotin and all.-- +++$+++ ::::what if we reword it and mention about the Indian censor laws which do not allow on-screen nudity at all? due to that law, political parties and its workers do create problems in the screening of a particular work of art - ''[[Bandit Queen]], [[Kama Sutra: A Tale of Love]], [[Fire (1996 film)|Fire]]'', [[M.F. Hussain]]'s paintings of nude godesses, etc.. If its against the "law" then obviously it gives a reason to explain the riotin and all.--[[User:Enigmaticanant|Anant Singh]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticanant|talk]]) 21:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
269585 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269580 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.236489960E09 +++$+++ As long as the hook is reliably sourced in the article, is under 200 characters, and is intriguing.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::As long as the hook is reliably sourced in the article, is under 200 characters, and is intriguing.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
269586 +++$+++ Enigmaticanant +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269580 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.236490980E09 +++$+++ Let me search for a good reference...i'll think of the hook  too. Regards, -- +++$+++ :::::::Let me search for a good reference...i'll think of the hook  too. Regards, --[[User:Enigmaticanant|Anant Singh]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticanant|talk]]) 21:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
269587 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269580 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.236491040E09 +++$+++ Great!  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::Great!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

7437 +++$+++ Ckatz +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7437 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.307862240E09 +++$+++ Ah, didn't see the duplicate entry. Thanks for catching that. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ Ah, didn't see the duplicate entry. Thanks for catching that. Cheers. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 00:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
7438 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7437 +++$+++ 7437 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.307863080E09 +++$+++ It was easy to miss -- I did a couple fixes and missed it as well.   +++$+++ :  It was easy to miss -- I did a couple fixes and missed it as well.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 00:18, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

531728 +++$+++ Neurolysis +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-07 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.234035840E09 +++$+++ <font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"><b>&mdash;  +++$+++ <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>&mdash; [[User:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">neuro</font>]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">(talk)</font>]]</i></sup></font> 11:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531729 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531728 +++$+++ 531728 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.234036260E09 +++$+++ Pretty graphs! Already the RFA has paid off. :)  +++$+++ :Pretty graphs! Already the RFA has paid off. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 11:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531730 +++$+++ Neurolysis +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531728 +++$+++ 531729 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.234728360E09 +++$+++ And I [[User_talk:Neurolysis\/Archives\/2009\/January#Abacus|already got my trouting]] :D <font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"><b>&mdash;  +++$+++ ::And I [[User_talk:Neurolysis/Archives/2009/January#Abacus|already got my trouting]] :D <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>&mdash; [[User:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">neuro</font>]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">(talk)</font>]]</i></sup></font> 12:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

7442 +++$+++ Agent 86 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-24 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.308984540E09 +++$+++ As for the \"tablizing\" that you have been doing, while I was not a big fan of the idea, it looks really good.  +++$+++ As for the "tablizing" that you have been doing, while I was not a big fan of the idea, it looks really good. [[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] ([[User talk:Agent 86|talk]]) 23:49, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
7443 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.308990540E09 +++$+++ I've removed the notes parameter.  The notes need to be there, but they go under a table, not in a table.  Check the Iron Chef America episode article for format.  The parameter as you created it makes the table much longer with too many empty cells in order to house too little information. Hang on until I finish Season 2, then I'll restore all the notes at once.  Also, it's really tough when we're editing \"over\" each other.  Let me finish season two, then we can talk about what needs to be done next aside from finishing the rest of the seasons.  That avoids a repeat of edits such as you removing the first-instance linking of the editors I'd very carefully done.   +++$+++ : I've removed the notes parameter.  The notes need to be there, but they go under a table, not in a table.  Check the Iron Chef America episode article for format.  The parameter as you created it makes the table much longer with too many empty cells in order to house too little information. Hang on until I finish Season 2, then I'll restore all the notes at once.  Also, it's really tough when we're editing "over" each other.  Let me finish season two, then we can talk about what needs to be done next aside from finishing the rest of the seasons.  That avoids a repeat of edits such as you removing the first-instance linking of the editors I'd very carefully done.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 01:29, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
7444 +++$+++ Agent 86 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ 7443 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.308991620E09 +++$+++ All in all, I must admit the new table format looks good. Great work. +++$+++ ::All in all, I must admit the new table format looks good. Great work.[[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] ([[User talk:Agent 86|talk]]) 01:47, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
7445 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ 7444 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.308992760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification -- I understand your motives for the note above.  For some reason, it just took me aback.  Sorry if I was heavy-handed; I tried a little humor but EPIC FAIL.   +++$+++ ::: Thanks for the clarification -- I understand your motives for the note above.  For some reason, it just took me aback.  Sorry if I was heavy-handed; I tried a little humor but EPIC FAIL.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 02:06, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
7446 +++$+++ Agent 86 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.308993120E09 +++$+++ FYI, before you posted your latest follow up, I added this issue to the article's talk page, plus invited comments on a few of the TV wikiproject pages. I had a longer comment about it for your talk page, but got conflicted out when I hit save. +++$+++ *FYI, before you posted your latest follow up, I added this issue to the article's talk page, plus invited comments on a few of the TV wikiproject pages. I had a longer comment about it for your talk page, but got conflicted out when I hit save.[[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] ([[User talk:Agent 86|talk]]) 02:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
7447 +++$+++ Agent 86 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.309161120E09 +++$+++ I'm so disappointed you reverted my last set of edits without doing a revision history check. There was no potential for edit conflicts, as [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:List_of_Chopped_episodes#Trivia_and_overlinking you had said that you were done for the night]. All I did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_Chopped_episodes&action=historysubmit&diff=436319160&oldid=436302094 was remove the overlinks]. I did nothing to change the tables, format, or content. It took me three hours to remove all that linkcruft, so I'm feeling a little out of sorts about its revision. +++$+++ *I'm so disappointed you reverted my last set of edits without doing a revision history check. There was no potential for edit conflicts, as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Chopped_episodes#Trivia_and_overlinking you had said that you were done for the night]. All I did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Chopped_episodes&action=historysubmit&diff=436319160&oldid=436302094 was remove the overlinks]. I did nothing to change the tables, format, or content. It took me three hours to remove all that linkcruft, so I'm feeling a little out of sorts about its revision.[[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] ([[User talk:Agent 86|talk]]) 00:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
7448 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.309161600E09 +++$+++ Trouble was, I was in the middle of converting seasons four and five, which created the edit conflict.  You couldn't see it, which is why I asked you to please not edit over or ahead of me (more than once), and to be patient until the conversion is done.  I'm sorry you're out of sorts, but it takes me three to four hours to convert one season to table, and that's without having to go back and attempt to find, then correct the edits you made in the middle of the conversion.  Imagine how frustrated I was.  It was an outright nightmare to fix, so I had no choice but to revert.  Please, PLEASE just wait until the table conversion is done before you make any further edits.  I know you want to improve the article, but the idea was to collaborate, and you're just making things more difficult.  +++$+++ :  Trouble was, I was in the middle of converting seasons four and five, which created the edit conflict.  You couldn't see it, which is why I asked you to please not edit over or ahead of me (more than once), and to be patient until the conversion is done.  I'm sorry you're out of sorts, but it takes me three to four hours to convert one season to table, and that's without having to go back and attempt to find, then correct the edits you made in the middle of the conversion.  Imagine how frustrated I was.  It was an outright nightmare to fix, so I had no choice but to revert.  Please, PLEASE just wait until the table conversion is done before you make any further edits.  I know you want to improve the article, but the idea was to collaborate, and you're just making things more difficult. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 01:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
7449 +++$+++ Agent 86 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ 7448 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.309162560E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but I took you at your word when you said you were done for the night. I had thought as part of the collaboration that you'd wake up and be able to work with a version that did not require you to remove all the linkcruft. +++$+++ ::I'm sorry, but I took you at your word when you said you were done for the night. I had thought as part of the collaboration that you'd wake up and be able to work with a version that did not require you to remove all the linkcruft.[[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] ([[User talk:Agent 86|talk]]) 01:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
7450 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7442 +++$+++ 7449 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.309162860E09 +++$+++ And I took you at your word that you were going to stop editing until the tables were done, or I'd have warned you I had torn S4 and S5 (as I now have S6 and S7) apart to get them ready to move to table form.  I know you wanted to be helpful, and I appreciate that, but I would really appreciate it if you'd stop editing until I finish the tables.  Right now, that's the best way you can help.  Then we can discuss what should\/shouldn't be linked, and what needs to be done next.   +++$+++ ::: And I took you at your word that you were going to stop editing until the tables were done, or I'd have warned you I had torn S4 and S5 (as I now have S6 and S7) apart to get them ready to move to table form.  I know you wanted to be helpful, and I appreciate that, but I would really appreciate it if you'd stop editing until I finish the tables.  Right now, that's the best way you can help.  Then we can discuss what should/shouldn't be linked, and what needs to be done next.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 01:21, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

531731 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531731 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-07 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.234045380E09 +++$+++ Well done girl! :) hope you dont mind me calling you that !  +++$+++ Well done girl! :) hope you dont mind me calling you that ! [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 14:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531732 +++$+++ Neurolysis +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531731 +++$+++ 531731 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.234048080E09 +++$+++ I hope he doesn't mind you calling him a girl ;) <font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"><b>&mdash;  +++$+++ :I hope he doesn't mind you calling him a girl ;) <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>&mdash; [[User:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">neuro</font>]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">(talk)</font>]]</i></sup></font> 15:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531733 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531731 +++$+++ 531731 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.234048380E09 +++$+++ Huh? people vote in rfas and dont even look at the user pages - nah i dont believe it  +++$+++ :Huh? people vote in rfas and dont even look at the user pages - nah i dont believe it [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 15:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531734 +++$+++ Neurolysis +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531731 +++$+++ 531733 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.234049280E09 +++$+++ People are silly. Usually that's just me, though. <font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"><b>&mdash;  +++$+++ ::People are silly. Usually that's just me, though. <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>&mdash; [[User:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">neuro</font>]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">(talk)</font>]]</i></sup></font> 15:28, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531735 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531731 +++$+++ 531731 +++$+++ 2009-02-08 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.234119900E09 +++$+++ Thanks mate! Yeah, I thought everyone calling me \"he\" was pretty funny because Hesp's nom statement clearly referred to me as \"she\", and I assumed the people !voting would have read that. :)  +++$+++ :Thanks mate! Yeah, I thought everyone calling me "he" was pretty funny because Hesp's nom statement clearly referred to me as "she", and I assumed the people !voting would have read that. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 11:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

269588 +++$+++ Anameofmyveryown +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269588 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-07 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.236421800E09 +++$+++ Re your check of Forward Poland [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ADid_you_know&diff=275391783&oldid=275391715 here]: I've increased the word count to what I think is 2000+ characters, ex spaces. Could you be so kind as to give it another pass? Regards,  +++$+++ Re your check of Forward Poland [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ADid_you_know&diff=275391783&oldid=275391715 here]: I've increased the word count to what I think is 2000+ characters, ex spaces. Could you be so kind as to give it another pass? Regards, [[User:Anameofmyveryown|Anameofmyveryown]] ([[User talk:Anameofmyveryown|talk]]) 02:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
269589 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269588 +++$+++ 269588 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.236423360E09 +++$+++ Fixed. But I don't think you need all those headings. They detract from the article, in my opinion.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Fixed. But I don't think you need all those headings. They detract from the article, in my opinion.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
269590 +++$+++ Anameofmyveryown +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269588 +++$+++ 269589 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.236569400E09 +++$+++ I've tablefied the \"structure\" section, thus reducing the headings. Hope that helps, regards  +++$+++ ::I've tablefied the "structure" section, thus reducing the headings. Hope that helps, regards [[User:Anameofmyveryown|Anameofmyveryown]] ([[User talk:Anameofmyveryown|talk]]) 20:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

269591 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-08 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.236510180E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I wasn't attacking you. If you have any technical problems, then I can deal with them. I did not write the language of the piece. That is Liz. If you want her to change some of the phrases or colloquialisms, ask her. If you require grammar clean up and the rest, then mention them. It has been copyedited by four different people so far. Sure, there are things that are missed. There are things from the Johnson page that are missed until now. Can you please come back and help me find things that -I- can work with.  +++$+++ Mattisse, I wasn't attacking you. If you have any technical problems, then I can deal with them. I did not write the language of the piece. That is Liz. If you want her to change some of the phrases or colloquialisms, ask her. If you require grammar clean up and the rest, then mention them. It has been copyedited by four different people so far. Sure, there are things that are missed. There are things from the Johnson page that are missed until now. Can you please come back and help me find things that -I- can work with. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 04:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
269592 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269591 +++$+++ 269591 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.236512940E09 +++$+++ And Mattisse - I am sorry if I was brisk with you. You are a great reviewer. I just need something I can work with besides what appears to be \"the wording isn't really appealing to me\".  +++$+++ :And Mattisse - I am sorry if I was brisk with you. You are a great reviewer. I just need something I can work with besides what appears to be "the wording isn't really appealing to me". [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 04:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
269593 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269591 +++$+++ 269592 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.236545700E09 +++$+++ I gave specific examples from the third para of the lede, as did Fowler&Fowler from the first two paras. Those were examples. The whole article needs a good copy editing, in my opinion.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::I gave specific examples from the third para of the lede, as did Fowler&Fowler from the first two paras. Those were examples. The whole article needs a good copy editing, in my opinion.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
269594 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269591 +++$+++ 269593 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.236579660E09 +++$+++ Then go through and copy edit. Fowler threw out malformed jargon and showed that he did not know what he is talking about. He is also continuing to harp on something a long time after there was already a change. If you see some grammatical problems, feel free to change. Awadewit has done so already.  +++$+++ :::Then go through and copy edit. Fowler threw out malformed jargon and showed that he did not know what he is talking about. He is also continuing to harp on something a long time after there was already a change. If you see some grammatical problems, feel free to change. Awadewit has done so already. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 23:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

531736 +++$+++ Neurolysis +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-07 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.234053360E09 +++$+++ I've just been looking at your userpage, and figured I should make mine more minimal. Would it be alright if I modified the content of and proceeded to use yours? <font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"><b>&mdash;  +++$+++ I've just been looking at your userpage, and figured I should make mine more minimal. Would it be alright if I modified the content of and proceeded to use yours? <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>&mdash; [[User:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">neuro</font>]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">(talk)</font>]]</i></sup></font> 16:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531737 +++$+++ Neurolysis +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531736 +++$+++ 531736 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.234076520E09 +++$+++ Okay, I've got it up at [[User:Neurolysis]] (with attribution in the source). If you would prefer otherwise, hit me up. :) <font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"><b>&mdash;  +++$+++ :Okay, I've got it up at [[User:Neurolysis]] (with attribution in the source). If you would prefer otherwise, hit me up. :) <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>&mdash; [[User:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">neuro</font>]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">(talk)</font>]]</i></sup></font> 23:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
531738 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531736 +++$+++ 531737 +++$+++ 2009-02-08 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.234120500E09 +++$+++ Looks good! I like minimalist user pages. :)  +++$+++ ::Looks good! I like minimalist user pages. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 11:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

569220 +++$+++ SadDamMadDam +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-19 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.164003960E09 +++$+++ A idiotic user [[:User:GhostPirate]] has deleted my article [[:Onion Street]] without my permission. I then made a page critising his actions and that also got deleted. I demand the banning of this user at once. -- +++$+++ A idiotic user [[:User:GhostPirate]] has deleted my article [[:Onion Street]] without my permission. I then made a page critising his actions and that also got deleted. I demand the banning of this user at once. --[[User:SadDamMadDam|SadDamMadDam]] 22:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
569221 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569220 +++$+++ 569220 +++$+++ 2006-11-19 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.164004260E09 +++$+++ I take it that you mean [[:Onion Bridge]]?  Permission is not required for speedy deletions; indeed, the author's permission is not required for anything as under the terms of GFDL you do not own your contributions, so being possessive about articles is a waste of time and energy. I have already told you about resolving disputes amicably.  I suggest that you take the necessary steps to do so.  +++$+++ :I take it that you mean [[:Onion Bridge]]?  Permission is not required for speedy deletions; indeed, the author's permission is not required for anything as under the terms of GFDL you do not own your contributions, so being possessive about articles is a waste of time and energy. I have already told you about resolving disputes amicably.  I suggest that you take the necessary steps to do so. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:31, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
569222 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569220 +++$+++ 569220 +++$+++ 2006-11-19 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.164006120E09 +++$+++ No problem! I'm surprised that it didn't already exist, considering the cast list. It's a good film.  Perhaps you can look at the [[:Template:Infobox Film|film infobox template]] as something else to add to raise the standard of the article, along with all of the great information that you have already contributed? Regards,  +++$+++ :No problem! I'm surprised that it didn't already exist, considering the cast list. It's a good film.  Perhaps you can look at the [[:Template:Infobox Film|film infobox template]] as something else to add to raise the standard of the article, along with all of the great information that you have already contributed? Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

7451 +++$+++ 87.78.48.131 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7451 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-07 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310073840E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Battlestar_Galactica_%282004_TV_series%29&action=historysubmit&diff=438243745&oldid=438240736 This] was not [[WP:vandalism|vandalism]]. Imo, the quotes give the article a very [[WP:IN-U|in-universe]] touch. Somebody apparently put them there in place of properly verifiable review and analysis of the plot. The quotes convey the tone of the series in an unreflected way rather than contributing to a sober, neutral recounting of the narrative content. --[[Special:Contributions\/87.78.48.131|87.78.48.131]] ( +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battlestar_Galactica_%282004_TV_series%29&action=historysubmit&diff=438243745&oldid=438240736 This] was not [[WP:vandalism|vandalism]]. Imo, the quotes give the article a very [[WP:IN-U|in-universe]] touch. Somebody apparently put them there in place of properly verifiable review and analysis of the plot. The quotes convey the tone of the series in an unreflected way rather than contributing to a sober, neutral recounting of the narrative content. --[[Special:Contributions/87.78.48.131|87.78.48.131]] ([[User talk:87.78.48.131|talk]]) 14:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
7452 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7451 +++$+++ 7451 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.310074320E09 +++$+++ Which is all fine.  But with an IP editor, and absent both an edit summary and any discussion on the talk page, how is another editor to know?  This is a potentially controversial edit, as those quotes have been in the article for some time, and accumulated as they changed.  At the very least, the edit should have had a clearly explanatory edit summary.  Ideally, the edit was discussed before it was made, and then made only once you had consensus to remove the quotes.  As it is, to take them out with neither invited other editors to draw their own conclusions about why the quotes were removed.   +++$+++ : Which is all fine.  But with an IP editor, and absent both an edit summary and any discussion on the talk page, how is another editor to know?  This is a potentially controversial edit, as those quotes have been in the article for some time, and accumulated as they changed.  At the very least, the edit should have had a clearly explanatory edit summary.  Ideally, the edit was discussed before it was made, and then made only once you had consensus to remove the quotes.  As it is, to take them out with neither invited other editors to draw their own conclusions about why the quotes were removed.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 14:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
7453 +++$+++ 87.78.48.131 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7451 +++$+++ 7452 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.310075160E09 +++$+++ More importantly, since you appear to be focused on the perceived accusatory content of my message (which, again, is far removed from my intentions), how about you focus on the edit itself rather than its circumstances? It is of crucial importance to your revert whether ''you'' believe that those quotes should be in there or not. Do you? If so, let's focus the discussion on the content of my edit, on those quotes. --[[Special:Contributions\/87.78.48.131|87.78.48.131]] ( +++$+++ ::More importantly, since you appear to be focused on the perceived accusatory content of my message (which, again, is far removed from my intentions), how about you focus on the edit itself rather than its circumstances? It is of crucial importance to your revert whether ''you'' believe that those quotes should be in there or not. Do you? If so, let's focus the discussion on the content of my edit, on those quotes. --[[Special:Contributions/87.78.48.131|87.78.48.131]] ([[User talk:87.78.48.131|talk]]) 14:46, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
7454 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7451 +++$+++ 7453 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.310077920E09 +++$+++ So, if you feel strongly that they should come out, start a discussion on the article talk page.  Who knows; no one may give a hoot, and you can take them out with implied consensus behind you.  (An aside: you're rather well-informed for an IP editor.  That will draw questions from some editors, many of whom may have suspicions about why an experienced editor isn't registered. Fair or not, that colors perceptions of an edit.)   +++$+++ ::: So, if you feel strongly that they should come out, start a discussion on the article talk page.  Who knows; no one may give a hoot, and you can take them out with implied consensus behind you.  (An aside: you're rather well-informed for an IP editor.  That will draw questions from some editors, many of whom may have suspicions about why an experienced editor isn't registered. Fair or not, that colors perceptions of an edit.)  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 15:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
7455 +++$+++ 87.78.48.131 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7451 +++$+++ 7454 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310081040E09 +++$+++ In all, the quotes need at least proper attribution. Even then, they still represent questionable style. Local consensus cannot override site-wide policy considerations, especially not copyright or essential stylistic issues. --[[Special:Contributions\/87.78.48.131|87.78.48.131]] ( +++$+++ ::::In all, the quotes need at least proper attribution. Even then, they still represent questionable style. Local consensus cannot override site-wide policy considerations, especially not copyright or essential stylistic issues. --[[Special:Contributions/87.78.48.131|87.78.48.131]] ([[User talk:87.78.48.131|talk]]) 16:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

531741 +++$+++ Cygnis insignis +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-13 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.234561380E09 +++$+++ Unless you are closing up shop for the evening, I was wondering if I could ask you to run your eye over [[Novae Hollandiae Plantarum Specimen]]? <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps;\"> +++$+++ Unless you are closing up shop for the evening, I was wondering if I could ask you to run your eye over [[Novae Hollandiae Plantarum Specimen]]? <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User talk:cygnis insignis|cygnis insignis]]</span> 13:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
531742 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531741 +++$+++ 531741 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.234562040E09 +++$+++ I took a quick look and I'm not up to reading through it properly at the moment. :) I'll be back on here tomorrow morning and I'll have a look then, if that's OK?  +++$+++ :I took a quick look and I'm not up to reading through it properly at the moment. :) I'll be back on here tomorrow morning and I'll have a look then, if that's OK? [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 13:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
531743 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531741 +++$+++ 531742 +++$+++ 2009-02-14 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.234609080E09 +++$+++ Actually it'll be later today.  +++$+++ ::Actually it'll be later today. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

7456 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7456 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310432160E09 +++$+++ I'm indeed happy he's made this first step. I have to admit I'm perplexed by his back-and-forth edits at ''[[Top Chef: Just Desserts]]'', and his score of contentious edits and subsequent talk-page warnings are troubling. I guess the thing to do for now is keep a watch in case of non-constructive edits. Good to be working with you.-- +++$+++ I'm indeed happy he's made this first step. I have to admit I'm perplexed by his back-and-forth edits at ''[[Top Chef: Just Desserts]]'', and his score of contentious edits and subsequent talk-page warnings are troubling. I guess the thing to do for now is keep a watch in case of non-constructive edits. Good to be working with you.--[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 17:56, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
7457 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7456 +++$+++ 7456 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.310451540E09 +++$+++ That editor seems to have pulled back for the moment. I'd say the proper course would be to just keep an eye on  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/205.209.83.211 the editor's contributions page] and to try, as hard as it is, to assume good faith. I've seen people change their behavior when they begin to realize it's necessary to be collaborative and to follow Wikipedia policies. Of course, I've also seen rogue editors whose behavior defies logic or common sense...! -- +++$+++ :That editor seems to have pulled back for the moment. I'd say the proper course would be to just keep an eye on  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/205.209.83.211 the editor's contributions page] and to try, as hard as it is, to assume good faith. I've seen people change their behavior when they begin to realize it's necessary to be collaborative and to follow Wikipedia policies. Of course, I've also seen rogue editors whose behavior defies logic or common sense...! --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 23:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
7458 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7456 +++$+++ 7457 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.310517300E09 +++$+++ Good call. I think this editor was given every good-faith benefit of the doubt, but this person is behaving very irresponsibly. -- +++$+++ ::Good call. I think this editor was given every good-faith benefit of the doubt, but this person is behaving very irresponsibly. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 17:35, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7459 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7456 +++$+++ 7458 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310525700E09 +++$+++ And by the way, Ph.D. in philosophy? Very impressive! So many Wikipedia contributors appear to be intemperate high schoolers! -- +++$+++ :::And by the way, Ph.D. in philosophy? Very impressive! So many Wikipedia contributors appear to be intemperate high schoolers! --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 19:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7460 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7456 +++$+++ 7459 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.310539500E09 +++$+++ Yes, clearly, to my eyes, a sockpuppet. I've had experienced reporting them. I'll be glad to handle that now while you keep an eye on this rogue editor. -- +++$+++ ::::Yes, clearly, to my eyes, a sockpuppet. I've had experienced reporting them. I'll be glad to handle that now while you keep an eye on this rogue editor. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 23:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7461 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7456 +++$+++ 7460 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.310540580E09 +++$+++ I've started off by notifying the admin who instituted the block, about this block evasion.-- +++$+++ :::::I've started off by notifying the admin who instituted the block, about this block evasion.--[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 00:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

269602 +++$+++ Enigmaticanant +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-09 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.236617460E09 +++$+++ Hello Matisse,<br \/>I'm not quite happy with the rewording of the plot as it actually gives out wrong information. the film is kind of an artistic flow of images and not everything is explained in it. its not really true that the parrot brought the lover out of gratitude; also, the lover just knows the name \"kurangi' but doesnt know who she is...its his imagination, which is conflicted when he hears the captured parrot utter her name. anyways, i'll try rewording it and not make it look like a copy-paste. the problem is that i can write a plot synopsis having seen the film, but m not quite sure i can find suitable sources for that.<br \/> regards, -- +++$+++ Hello Matisse,<br />I'm not quite happy with the rewording of the plot as it actually gives out wrong information. the film is kind of an artistic flow of images and not everything is explained in it. its not really true that the parrot brought the lover out of gratitude; also, the lover just knows the name "kurangi' but doesnt know who she is...its his imagination, which is conflicted when he hears the captured parrot utter her name. anyways, i'll try rewording it and not make it look like a copy-paste. the problem is that i can write a plot synopsis having seen the film, but m not quite sure i can find suitable sources for that.<br /> regards, --[[User:Enigmaticanant|Anant Singh]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticanant|talk]]) 09:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
269603 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269602 +++$+++ 269602 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.236622260E09 +++$+++ I rewrote the plot to get rid of the copyvio as a temporary measure,  as that was disqualifying the DYK. I believe the plot section does not have to be referenced for film, TV series etc. because it is considered a description and not an interpretation. So I believe you could factually describe the script without interpreting any of it and not need a reference. Alternatively, you could reword the cut\/paste into you own words and use the same reference. The plot section should not be very long anyway.  Just no copyvio\/cut and paste. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I rewrote the plot to get rid of the copyvio as a temporary measure,  as that was disqualifying the DYK. I believe the plot section does not have to be referenced for film, TV series etc. because it is considered a description and not an interpretation. So I believe you could factually describe the script without interpreting any of it and not need a reference. Alternatively, you could reword the cut/paste into you own words and use the same reference. The plot section should not be very long anyway.  Just no copyvio/cut and paste. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 11:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
269604 +++$+++ Enigmaticanant +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269602 +++$+++ 269603 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.236622740E09 +++$+++ alright, no problem. will make the amendments soon. regards, -- +++$+++ :: alright, no problem. will make the amendments soon. regards, --[[User:Enigmaticanant|Anant Singh]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticanant|talk]]) 11:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

579654 +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ 579654 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-01 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.183323780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] 14:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
579655 +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ 579654 +++$+++ 579654 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.183757880E09 +++$+++ The notability issue is separate from the copyright issue I already responded to you about.  Notability documentation can be found at [[WP:NOTE]].  [[WP:RS]] is also important here.  In general, it says that you need to show that your organization has been detailed in ''reliable''', '''independent''', '''3rd party''' sources.  Read the links, please.  One more of importance here is [[WP:COI]], conflict of interest.  That describes why, while not prohibited, it is generally a Very Bad Thing for the subjects of articles to be writing their own articles.  It very, very often ends badly. -  +++$+++ : The notability issue is separate from the copyright issue I already responded to you about.  Notability documentation can be found at [[WP:NOTE]].  [[WP:RS]] is also important here.  In general, it says that you need to show that your organization has been detailed in ''reliable''', '''independent''', '''3rd party''' sources.  Read the links, please.  One more of importance here is [[WP:COI]], conflict of interest.  That describes why, while not prohibited, it is generally a Very Bad Thing for the subjects of articles to be writing their own articles.  It very, very often ends badly. - [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] 14:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

269605 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269605 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-09 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.236585540E09 +++$+++ Have you had a chance to read my [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/Water_fluoridation&diff=274881111&oldid=274683927 response] to your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/Water_fluoridation&diff=274675504&oldid=274661857 latest (March 3) comment] in ''[[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Water fluoridation]]''? Briefly, what I attempted to do was to be more-consistent about terminology in that article. I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Water_fluoridation&diff=274878094&oldid=274719727 modified] the article to following the source's use of the term \"fluoridated water\" to include both naturally and artificially fluoridated water, and the term \"water fluoridation\" to mean the act of artificially fluoridating water. Further comments are welcome.  +++$+++ Have you had a chance to read my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Water_fluoridation&diff=274881111&oldid=274683927 response] to your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Water_fluoridation&diff=274675504&oldid=274661857 latest (March 3) comment] in ''[[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Water fluoridation]]''? Briefly, what I attempted to do was to be more-consistent about terminology in that article. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Water_fluoridation&diff=274878094&oldid=274719727 modified] the article to following the source's use of the term "fluoridated water" to include both naturally and artificially fluoridated water, and the term "water fluoridation" to mean the act of artificially fluoridating water. Further comments are welcome. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] ([[User talk:Eubulides|talk]]) 00:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
269606 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269605 +++$+++ 269605 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.236624000E09 +++$+++ I will look at the article again.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I will look at the article again.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 11:40, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
269607 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269605 +++$+++ 269606 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.236662400E09 +++$+++ Thanks. In the meantime the featured-article nomination has failed, with the nomination discussion archived to ''[[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Water fluoridation\/archive1]]''. I expect that the main problem for reviewers (and for me!) was burnout: we'd all looked at the article too many times. Anyway, I plan to nominate ''[[Water fluoridation]]'' again in a few weeks, as I have tried to modify it to address all the objections raised during nomination; so if you could follow up on ''[[Talk:Water fluoridation]]'' I'd appreciate it.  +++$+++ :: Thanks. In the meantime the featured-article nomination has failed, with the nomination discussion archived to ''[[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Water fluoridation/archive1]]''. I expect that the main problem for reviewers (and for me!) was burnout: we'd all looked at the article too many times. Anyway, I plan to nominate ''[[Water fluoridation]]'' again in a few weeks, as I have tried to modify it to address all the objections raised during nomination; so if you could follow up on ''[[Talk:Water fluoridation]]'' I'd appreciate it. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] ([[User talk:Eubulides|talk]]) 22:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
269608 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269605 +++$+++ 269607 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.236662880E09 +++$+++ Yay, I looked for it and couldn't find it, so I figure it had been archived. I would not have supported it anyway. At the most I would have removed my Oppose. I hope in the meantime you clarify it. It remained  confusing, not straightforward. I hope you won't be offended if I say that I question if you understood the complaints regarding it. I didn't feel like you understood my complaints. In fact, the article seemed to be deteriorating with every attempt to fix it.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Yay, I looked for it and couldn't find it, so I figure it had been archived. I would not have supported it anyway. At the most I would have removed my Oppose. I hope in the meantime you clarify it. It remained  confusing, not straightforward. I hope you won't be offended if I say that I question if you understood the complaints regarding it. I didn't feel like you understood my complaints. In fact, the article seemed to be deteriorating with every attempt to fix it.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
269609 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269605 +++$+++ 269608 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.236683160E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::[[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] ([[User talk:Eubulides|talk]]) 04:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
269610 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269605 +++$+++ 269609 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.236747480E09 +++$+++ Sorry that I was unclear. As I said, the most I would have done was withdraw my Oppose, and I did notice that some who withdrew their Oppose were less than enthusiastic about the article and did not Support. Next time I will try to be clearer, but in reading through the comments of others, I felt that they had somewhat the same complaint.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Sorry that I was unclear. As I said, the most I would have done was withdraw my Oppose, and I did notice that some who withdrew their Oppose were less than enthusiastic about the article and did not Support. Next time I will try to be clearer, but in reading through the comments of others, I felt that they had somewhat the same complaint.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
269611 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269605 +++$+++ 269610 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.236852480E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. Did the above-mentioned changes[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Water_fluoridation&diff=274878094&oldid=274810675][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Water_fluoridation&diff=274810675&oldid=274724471][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Water_fluoridation&diff=274724471&oldid=274719727] improve the article? If not, perhaps we should revert them, as they were made in an attempt to fix the problems that you noted.  +++$+++ :::::: Fair enough. Did the above-mentioned changes[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Water_fluoridation&diff=274878094&oldid=274810675][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Water_fluoridation&diff=274810675&oldid=274724471][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Water_fluoridation&diff=274724471&oldid=274719727] improve the article? If not, perhaps we should revert them, as they were made in an attempt to fix the problems that you noted. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] ([[User talk:Eubulides|talk]]) 03:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

7462 +++$+++ Cindamuse +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.310683020E09 +++$+++ Noticed some conversation on the talk page of the IP User [[User talk:205.209.83.211|205.209.83.211]] and thought to give you a heads up. While the lack of edit summaries frustrate me to no end, the use is not a requirement on Wikipedia. That said, it is definitely good practice, tending to minimize the removal of user contributions. Consistent use also becomes a factor during requests for adminship, with RfA pages presenting statistics about how often the nominee has provided edit summaries in the past. All in all though, it's just not policy or a requirement. You can find more information about edit summaries '''[[Help:Edit summary|here]]'''. Best regards, <b><font color=\"navy\" face=\"Tahoma\"> +++$+++ Noticed some conversation on the talk page of the IP User [[User talk:205.209.83.211|205.209.83.211]] and thought to give you a heads up. While the lack of edit summaries frustrate me to no end, the use is not a requirement on Wikipedia. That said, it is definitely good practice, tending to minimize the removal of user contributions. Consistent use also becomes a factor during requests for adminship, with RfA pages presenting statistics about how often the nominee has provided edit summaries in the past. All in all though, it's just not policy or a requirement. You can find more information about edit summaries '''[[Help:Edit summary|here]]'''. Best regards, <b><font color="navy" face="Tahoma">[[User:Cindamuse|Cind.]]</font><font color="purple" face="Tahoma">[[User talk:Cindamuse#top|amuse]]</font></b> 15:37, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
7463 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7462 +++$+++ 7462 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.310692020E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the heads up, but I know all that.  But there's a little more to it than meets the eye if you're unfamiliar with the IP user's history, and in his\/her case, it became a line in the sand that was needed to begin to curb some pretty aggressive editing practices, particularly on articles relating to elimination-style competition TV shows.   +++$+++ : I appreciate the heads up, but I know all that.  But there's a little more to it than meets the eye if you're unfamiliar with the IP user's history, and in his/her case, it became a line in the sand that was needed to begin to curb some pretty aggressive editing practices, particularly on articles relating to elimination-style competition TV shows.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 18:07, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
7464 +++$+++ Cindamuse +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7462 +++$+++ 7463 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.310699520E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm completely aware of his history, encouraging him on all fronts to use edit summaries. Due to a lack of rationale for arbitrarily blanking content, I simply reverted his edits and placed a warning for blanking content. Anything short of threatening a block for not using edit summaries, which is not a blockable offense. Honestly, I expect a return to the same after the week block is over. That said, I also expect a block for blanking, if the disruptive editing continues. I would recommend a user warning more inline with policy, such as placing an escalating blanking template, rather than offering empty threats for not using an edit summary. In the long run, we'll likely have better (and quicker) results. Best regards, <b><font color=\"navy\" face=\"Tahoma\"> +++$+++ :: Yeah, I'm completely aware of his history, encouraging him on all fronts to use edit summaries. Due to a lack of rationale for arbitrarily blanking content, I simply reverted his edits and placed a warning for blanking content. Anything short of threatening a block for not using edit summaries, which is not a blockable offense. Honestly, I expect a return to the same after the week block is over. That said, I also expect a block for blanking, if the disruptive editing continues. I would recommend a user warning more inline with policy, such as placing an escalating blanking template, rather than offering empty threats for not using an edit summary. In the long run, we'll likely have better (and quicker) results. Best regards, <b><font color="navy" face="Tahoma">[[User:Cindamuse|Cind.]]</font><font color="purple" face="Tahoma">[[User talk:Cindamuse#top|amuse]]</font></b> 20:12, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
7465 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7462 +++$+++ 7464 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.310795580E09 +++$+++ You might want to read my comments with a bit more care before accusing me of making empty threats.  All my comments relating to blocks has to do with his\/ her edit warring and disruptive editing, which DID eventually result in a block.  Assumption of good faith extends to other editors' talk pages.  +++$+++ ::: You might want to read my comments with a bit more care before accusing me of making empty threats.  All my comments relating to blocks has to do with his/ her edit warring and disruptive editing, which DID eventually result in a block.  Assumption of good faith extends to other editors' talk pages. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 22:53, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
7466 +++$+++ Cindamuse +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7462 +++$+++ 7465 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.310820060E09 +++$+++ Certainly no accusation is intended, my apologies if the intent of my comment has been misimplied. This is not an indictment of your editing practices, but rather support offered, which may assist you in receiving better results in the future when encountering a disruptive editor. My comments have been presented, based on a misunderstanding of policy, indicated on the above referenced IP user's talk page.([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:205.209.83.211&diff=next&oldid=431371348] use of edit summaries [or lack thereof] is not applicable to policy.) ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:205.209.83.211&diff=next&oldid=431366535] failure to use edit summaries is not a blocking offense.) The talk page shows that you have made threats to report another editor, based on his lack of edit summaries.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:205.209.83.211&diff=next&oldid=431497507][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:205.209.83.211&diff=next&oldid=438684339][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:205.209.83.211&diff=next&oldid=438944038] While use of edit summaries is important and valuable within a collaborative community, the use is not required, as determined by the community.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29\/Archive_70#Force_edit_summary_usage_for_new_users_until_they.27re_autoconfirmed][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:PEREN#Automatically_prompt_for_missing_edit_summary] The community provides for a single-level notification, rather than escalated user warnings, for failing to use edit summaries. You have indicated that continued lack of edit summary use would result in an ANI report. Use of edit summaries is again, neither required nor a blockable offense. You have also presented a misunderstanding of WP's blocking policy.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:205.209.83.211&diff=next&oldid=438684339] The IP user was not blocked earlier, due to lack of process for that result. See also, '''[[WP:Guide_to_administrator_intervention_against_vandalism#When_to_report|when to report]]'''. The escalated process at this link [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:205.209.83.211#June_2011] would have resulted in a block, following just one act of disruptive editing and a report to AIV. This was never done. Overall, this IP user is a fairly new editor of four months. While it is clear that the editing was disruptive, some of the responses this editor has received have been inaccurate, based on a misunderstanding of policy. Responding to new users with excessive force (i.e., misapplication of policy, threats, and warnings using bold\/all caps and not in accordance with policy) can discourage them from editing in the future. While I fully believe that your communication with this other editor has been offered in good faith, you might consider suggesting editing standards and practices; and presenting reasoning, based on community guidelines and policies, rather than visually yelling and offering threats to other editors. A report to ANI or AIV for failure to provide edit summaries would be fruitless, essentially, an empty threat. Please note, the IP was blocked for vandalism and abusing multiple accounts, rather than failure to use edit summaries. While it is clear that the user's edits were disruptive, failure to use edit summaries is not applicable to vandalism. You can find additional information about the blocking policy '''[[WP:BP|here]]'''. Here is a list of '''[[Wikipedia:Template_messages\/User_talk_namespace\/Multi-level_templates|multi-level user warning templates]]'''. You may also be interested in utilizing '''[[WP:Twinkle|Twinkle]]''' for addressing vandalism. Again, my desire in contacting you is not to present an indictment, but to offer guidance which may present better results in your interaction with other editors in the future. If you are not able to receive this offer of support at this time, it will be in your talk page history for future reference. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you ever need assistance or have questions in the future. If you have concerns regarding my communication here and effort to offer support, you may notify others, '''[[WP:ANI|here]]'''. Best regards, <b><font color=\"navy\" face=\"Tahoma\"> +++$+++ ::::Certainly no accusation is intended, my apologies if the intent of my comment has been misimplied. This is not an indictment of your editing practices, but rather support offered, which may assist you in receiving better results in the future when encountering a disruptive editor. My comments have been presented, based on a misunderstanding of policy, indicated on the above referenced IP user's talk page.([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:205.209.83.211&diff=next&oldid=431371348] use of edit summaries [or lack thereof] is not applicable to policy.) ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:205.209.83.211&diff=next&oldid=431366535] failure to use edit summaries is not a blocking offense.) The talk page shows that you have made threats to report another editor, based on his lack of edit summaries.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:205.209.83.211&diff=next&oldid=431497507][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:205.209.83.211&diff=next&oldid=438684339][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:205.209.83.211&diff=next&oldid=438944038] While use of edit summaries is important and valuable within a collaborative community, the use is not required, as determined by the community.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29/Archive_70#Force_edit_summary_usage_for_new_users_until_they.27re_autoconfirmed][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:PEREN#Automatically_prompt_for_missing_edit_summary] The community provides for a single-level notification, rather than escalated user warnings, for failing to use edit summaries. You have indicated that continued lack of edit summary use would result in an ANI report. Use of edit summaries is again, neither required nor a blockable offense. You have also presented a misunderstanding of WP's blocking policy.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:205.209.83.211&diff=next&oldid=438684339] The IP user was not blocked earlier, due to lack of process for that result. See also, '''[[WP:Guide_to_administrator_intervention_against_vandalism#When_to_report|when to report]]'''. The escalated process at this link [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:205.209.83.211#June_2011] would have resulted in a block, following just one act of disruptive editing and a report to AIV. This was never done. Overall, this IP user is a fairly new editor of four months. While it is clear that the editing was disruptive, some of the responses this editor has received have been inaccurate, based on a misunderstanding of policy. Responding to new users with excessive force (i.e., misapplication of policy, threats, and warnings using bold/all caps and not in accordance with policy) can discourage them from editing in the future. While I fully believe that your communication with this other editor has been offered in good faith, you might consider suggesting editing standards and practices; and presenting reasoning, based on community guidelines and policies, rather than visually yelling and offering threats to other editors. A report to ANI or AIV for failure to provide edit summaries would be fruitless, essentially, an empty threat. Please note, the IP was blocked for vandalism and abusing multiple accounts, rather than failure to use edit summaries. While it is clear that the user's edits were disruptive, failure to use edit summaries is not applicable to vandalism. You can find additional information about the blocking policy '''[[WP:BP|here]]'''. Here is a list of '''[[Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace/Multi-level_templates|multi-level user warning templates]]'''. You may also be interested in utilizing '''[[WP:Twinkle|Twinkle]]''' for addressing vandalism. Again, my desire in contacting you is not to present an indictment, but to offer guidance which may present better results in your interaction with other editors in the future. If you are not able to receive this offer of support at this time, it will be in your talk page history for future reference. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you ever need assistance or have questions in the future. If you have concerns regarding my communication here and effort to offer support, you may notify others, '''[[WP:ANI|here]]'''. Best regards, <b><font color="navy" face="Tahoma">[[User:Cindamuse|Cind.]]</font><font color="purple" face="Tahoma">[[User talk:Cindamuse#top|amuse]]</font></b> 05:41, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
7467 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7462 +++$+++ 7466 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 07:41:00 +++$+++ 1.310827260E09 +++$+++ There's a fine old adage about leading a horse to water. Your intent appears to demonstrate what you see as your superior knowledge, and in so doing, to make me feel as stupid as possible.  A short course in human nature would teach you that unsolicited \"support\" tends to result in behavior opposite that desired.  I reiterate: your reading of my comments is erroneous, and your advise based on your own misunderstanding of what I said.  I have no interest in using the ANI.  Rather, I consider this discussion at an end.   +++$+++ ::::: There's a fine old adage about leading a horse to water. Your intent appears to demonstrate what you see as your superior knowledge, and in so doing, to make me feel as stupid as possible.  A short course in human nature would teach you that unsolicited "support" tends to result in behavior opposite that desired.  I reiterate: your reading of my comments is erroneous, and your advise based on your own misunderstanding of what I said.  I have no interest in using the ANI.  Rather, I consider this discussion at an end.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 07:41, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

531753 +++$+++ Buridan +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-22 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.235300220E09 +++$+++ actually, i didn't try to do what you said.  what i tried to do was a simple fork of precarity, because there were 2 different, but apparently there are 4 groups working on different concepts that do not overlap.   anyway, it isn't my issue, i was jsut trying to resolve the issue between groups.-- +++$+++ actually, i didn't try to do what you said.  what i tried to do was a simple fork of precarity, because there were 2 different, but apparently there are 4 groups working on different concepts that do not overlap.   anyway, it isn't my issue, i was jsut trying to resolve the issue between groups.--[[User:Buridan|Buridan]] ([[User talk:Buridan|talk]]) 02:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
531754 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531753 +++$+++ 531753 +++$+++ 2009-02-22 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.235300820E09 +++$+++ Replied [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABuridan&diff=272406874&oldid=272404867 on Buridan's talk page].  +++$+++ :Replied [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABuridan&diff=272406874&oldid=272404867 on Buridan's talk page]. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:07, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
531755 +++$+++ Buridan +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531753 +++$+++ 531754 +++$+++ 2009-02-22 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.235301540E09 +++$+++ should give attribution, just a nice thing to do. given the communities involved, there was no need.-- +++$+++ ::should give attribution, just a nice thing to do. given the communities involved, there was no need.--[[User:Buridan|Buridan]] ([[User talk:Buridan|talk]]) 03:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
531756 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531753 +++$+++ 531755 +++$+++ 2009-02-22 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.235301900E09 +++$+++ Replied [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABuridan&diff=272409524&oldid=272406874 here].  +++$+++ :::Replied [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABuridan&diff=272409524&oldid=272406874 here]. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
531757 +++$+++ Buridan +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531753 +++$+++ 531756 +++$+++ 2009-02-22 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.235303940E09 +++$+++ actually there seems to be a somewhat confused notion of legal, as it is not necessary for 'legal reasons' here, as the practices preclude it if you mean u.s. copyright law.  in published works of claimed authorship, then yes, but here we do not have claimed or solo authorship, we have community authorship, so good luck with the 'legal reasons', because there aren't any to speak of given the terms of participation in current frameworks of copyright law given the stated policies and current practices.  else if we did have to do such things, we'd have to close the whole project because we cannot account for copyright, nor the moral rights of the author claims we'd face.  I can see the moral necessity, but alas, i'm afraid you'll have to explain the legal issues quite a bit more for me to recognize them.-- +++$+++ ::::actually there seems to be a somewhat confused notion of legal, as it is not necessary for 'legal reasons' here, as the practices preclude it if you mean u.s. copyright law.  in published works of claimed authorship, then yes, but here we do not have claimed or solo authorship, we have community authorship, so good luck with the 'legal reasons', because there aren't any to speak of given the terms of participation in current frameworks of copyright law given the stated policies and current practices.  else if we did have to do such things, we'd have to close the whole project because we cannot account for copyright, nor the moral rights of the author claims we'd face.  I can see the moral necessity, but alas, i'm afraid you'll have to explain the legal issues quite a bit more for me to recognize them.--[[User:Buridan|Buridan]] ([[User talk:Buridan|talk]]) 03:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
531758 +++$+++ Buridan +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531753 +++$+++ 531756 +++$+++ 2009-02-22 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.235304960E09 +++$+++ so yes, there are no legal issues, unless you are claiming each discrete page is a separate project,  which it isn't and you want to claim that there is no way to determine past authors of the current pages, which would seem to be pretty hard to argue given that you found it and the bots found it before so there is a clear trail.  i agree giving credit is a wikipedia convention and part of the gfdl(granted all of my contributions are public domain), but simple examination of these pages shows the same contributors took the 'forked page' and started making a mess of it, so it is sort of moot.  it would be nice to do, but unnecessary. if you want to do it, be bold, but alas, i did what i did, and i'm not going to go back and do more there, nor am i likely to act differently unless there is good reason in the future.  I agree with the convention, i don't see that it is a norm, nor should i really worry about it.  but i welcome your concern and efforts as you see fit. -- +++$+++ ::::so yes, there are no legal issues, unless you are claiming each discrete page is a separate project,  which it isn't and you want to claim that there is no way to determine past authors of the current pages, which would seem to be pretty hard to argue given that you found it and the bots found it before so there is a clear trail.  i agree giving credit is a wikipedia convention and part of the gfdl(granted all of my contributions are public domain), but simple examination of these pages shows the same contributors took the 'forked page' and started making a mess of it, so it is sort of moot.  it would be nice to do, but unnecessary. if you want to do it, be bold, but alas, i did what i did, and i'm not going to go back and do more there, nor am i likely to act differently unless there is good reason in the future.  I agree with the convention, i don't see that it is a norm, nor should i really worry about it.  but i welcome your concern and efforts as you see fit. --[[User:Buridan|Buridan]] ([[User talk:Buridan|talk]]) 04:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
531759 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531753 +++$+++ 531753 +++$+++ 2009-03-03 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.236080580E09 +++$+++ Hi Bowielkk, please read the [[Wikipedia:FAQ\/Organizations|Frequently Asked Questions page for businesses]], particularly numbers 4, 5 and 6 in the list of contents. It explains the [[WP:notability|notability]] requirements for articles, and how to write an article that meets Wikipedia's standards. Once you have established notability (through multiple non-trivial mentions of AsiaPay in independent, [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]), make sure the text is [[WP:NPOV|neutral]] and not an advertisment. The article I deleted, [[Paydollar]], was a blatant advertisement (e.g. \"integrated payment transaction-processing service that enables your business...\", \"Visit our PayDollar eCharity corner to learn more.\" etc), hence why it wasn't suitable for Wikipedia. I hope that helps; please ask if you have any more questions.  +++$+++ :Hi Bowielkk, please read the [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations|Frequently Asked Questions page for businesses]], particularly numbers 4, 5 and 6 in the list of contents. It explains the [[WP:notability|notability]] requirements for articles, and how to write an article that meets Wikipedia's standards. Once you have established notability (through multiple non-trivial mentions of AsiaPay in independent, [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]), make sure the text is [[WP:NPOV|neutral]] and not an advertisment. The article I deleted, [[Paydollar]], was a blatant advertisement (e.g. "integrated payment transaction-processing service that enables your business...", "Visit our PayDollar eCharity corner to learn more." etc), hence why it wasn't suitable for Wikipedia. I hope that helps; please ask if you have any more questions. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
531760 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531753 +++$+++ 531753 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.236364440E09 +++$+++ Have a read through the links above and work on the article in userspace so it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me. :) Regards,  +++$+++ :Have a read through the links above and work on the article in userspace so it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me. :) Regards, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 10:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

569223 +++$+++ Netscott +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-21 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.164177180E09 +++$+++ Thanks (areopagitica) for the helping hand. ''([[User_talk:Netscott|\u2192]] +++$+++ Thanks (areopagitica) for the helping hand. ''([[User_talk:Netscott|→]][[User:Netscott|<span style='background: white; color: grey'>Netscott</span>]])'' 22:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
569224 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569223 +++$+++ 569223 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.164177420E09 +++$+++ No problem! Glad that I could help.  +++$+++ :No problem! Glad that I could help. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

7468 +++$+++ Jguy +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311192240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your diligent work keeping the [[CSI: Crime Scene Investigation]] article tidy and clean. Your efforts are awesome! <sup> +++$+++ Thanks for your diligent work keeping the [[CSI: Crime Scene Investigation]] article tidy and clean. Your efforts are awesome! <sup>[[User:Jguy|Jguy]]</sup><sub>[[User_talk:Jguy|Talk]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Jguy|Done]]</sup> 13:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
7469 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ 7468 +++$+++ 7468 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.311295680E09 +++$+++ My pleasure!  And thank you for the kind words, particularly coming as they did after the exchange above.   +++$+++ : My pleasure!  And thank you for the kind words, particularly coming as they did after the exchange above.  [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 17:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

269615 +++$+++ Laser_brain +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269615 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-13 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.236949140E09 +++$+++ Good evening, I am curious as to why you object to YellowMonkey being a delegate at FAR. I haven't spent much time over there, but I wonder if you had noticed anything troublesome that causes you to object. -- +++$+++ Good evening, I am curious as to why you object to YellowMonkey being a delegate at FAR. I haven't spent much time over there, but I wonder if you had noticed anything troublesome that causes you to object. --[[User:Laser_brain|<font color="purple">'''Laser brain'''</font >]] [[User_talk:Laser_brain|<font color="purple">(talk)</font >]] 05:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
269616 +++$+++ Raul654 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269615 +++$+++ 269615 +++$+++ 2009-03-13 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.236953220E09 +++$+++ I actually came here to ask something similar. You can send it by email if you want.  +++$+++ :I actually came here to ask something similar. You can send it by email if you want. [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654|talk]]) 07:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
269617 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269615 +++$+++ 269616 +++$+++ 2009-03-13 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.237010160E09 +++$+++ Done.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::Done.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

7473 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ DocYako +++$+++ 7473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-18 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.255919160E09 +++$+++ You are doing agreat job with the order of precedence of military decorations. I would like for you to take a look at this image [[:File:Alberto A. Nido jpg..jpg]] of Brigadier General [[Alberto A. Nido]]. Notice the badge. Now, during World War II he also served in the [[Royal Canadian Air Force]] and the [[British Royal Air Force]]. I was wondering if you know anything about the badge and if we have a proper image of the same in Wikipedia. Take care,  +++$+++ You are doing agreat job with the order of precedence of military decorations. I would like for you to take a look at this image [[:File:Alberto A. Nido jpg..jpg]] of Brigadier General [[Alberto A. Nido]]. Notice the badge. Now, during World War II he also served in the [[Royal Canadian Air Force]] and the [[British Royal Air Force]]. I was wondering if you know anything about the badge and if we have a proper image of the same in Wikipedia. Take care, [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 19:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
7474 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ DocYako +++$+++ 7473 +++$+++ 7473 +++$+++ 2009-10-19 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.255938480E09 +++$+++ I would like to thank all of you, [[User:DocYako|DocYako]], [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] and [[User:Brian Crawford|Brian Crawford]] for your imput. Yes, it is custom that an American military officer who prior to his service served for another country, place the military decorations of said country on his right side and the U.S. ones on the left, as long as said military decorations are permitted to be worn. His lapel covers a small portion of the crown above the wings, but I agree that it is hard to determine if the badge is an RAF or RCAF pilot's wings. That is the only known photo of Nido, however, I would be inclined to believe that the wings were RAF, since he participated in various missions as a member of such. It is a tough call. Thank you all once more.  +++$+++ *I would like to thank all of you, [[User:DocYako|DocYako]], [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] and [[User:Brian Crawford|Brian Crawford]] for your imput. Yes, it is custom that an American military officer who prior to his service served for another country, place the military decorations of said country on his right side and the U.S. ones on the left, as long as said military decorations are permitted to be worn. His lapel covers a small portion of the crown above the wings, but I agree that it is hard to determine if the badge is an RAF or RCAF pilot's wings. That is the only known photo of Nido, however, I would be inclined to believe that the wings were RAF, since he participated in various missions as a member of such. It is a tough call. Thank you all once more. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 00:48, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

269618 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-14 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.237068600E09 +++$+++ When I say \"it dealt more with off FAC matters\" I was referring to the perceptions of the people attacking you rather than your actual actions. In your own words - \"my perceived treatment\". I hope that clears things up.  +++$+++ When I say "it dealt more with off FAC matters" I was referring to the perceptions of the people attacking you rather than your actual actions. In your own words - "my perceived treatment". I hope that clears things up. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 15:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
269619 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269618 +++$+++ 269618 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.237069620E09 +++$+++ Yes! Thank you very much. And I do appreciate your eloquent defense of me there.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes! Thank you very much. And I do appreciate your eloquent defense of me there.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

531763 +++$+++ Cerejota +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-09 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.236598260E09 +++$+++ It was speedy deleted under A1 this user also created the similar [[Philadelphia Phillies Radio Network]]. Since I didn't get a chance to see the original, I ask for recreation, and for allowing to at least tag categorize and include in {{tl|Major League Baseball on the radio}}. The article certainly lacks quality and could be better, but we shouldn't [[WP:BITE]] and in particular in view of {{tl|Major League Baseball on the radio}} it most probably was not CSD A1. Could you please reverse? -- +++$+++ It was speedy deleted under A1 this user also created the similar [[Philadelphia Phillies Radio Network]]. Since I didn't get a chance to see the original, I ask for recreation, and for allowing to at least tag categorize and include in {{tl|Major League Baseball on the radio}}. The article certainly lacks quality and could be better, but we shouldn't [[WP:BITE]] and in particular in view of {{tl|Major League Baseball on the radio}} it most probably was not CSD A1. Could you please reverse? --[[User:Cerejota|Cerejota]] ([[User talk:Cerejota|talk]]) 04:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
531764 +++$+++ Cerejota +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531763 +++$+++ 531763 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.236598440E09 +++$+++ Also applies to [[San Diego Padres Radio Network]]. Thanks!-- +++$+++ :Also applies to [[San Diego Padres Radio Network]]. Thanks!--[[User:Cerejota|Cerejota]] ([[User talk:Cerejota|talk]]) 04:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
531765 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531763 +++$+++ 531764 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.236681720E09 +++$+++ I try my best not to be bite-y! Nine hours lapsed between another user tagging the Mets article and me deleting it, which is enough time to add more content or a hangon tag (as the user was still active), in which case I may have declined the speedy rather than delete. To me, an article consisting of the name of a radio station and a call sign is not encyclopedic content - same as, for example, the name of a company and an external link. [[Philadelphia Phillies Radio Network]] has been improved by other editors though so I'm willing to take a chance that these two articles will be too. I think you're also aware that this user had another 20 articles deleted that were much the same?  +++$+++ ::I try my best not to be bite-y! Nine hours lapsed between another user tagging the Mets article and me deleting it, which is enough time to add more content or a hangon tag (as the user was still active), in which case I may have declined the speedy rather than delete. To me, an article consisting of the name of a radio station and a call sign is not encyclopedic content - same as, for example, the name of a company and an external link. [[Philadelphia Phillies Radio Network]] has been improved by other editors though so I'm willing to take a chance that these two articles will be too. I think you're also aware that this user had another 20 articles deleted that were much the same? [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
531766 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531763 +++$+++ 531765 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.236785340E09 +++$+++ Well, San Diego Padres Radio Network has been speedily deleted again with much agreement at its [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/San Diego Padres Radio Network|AFD]], and New York Mets Radio Network has been made into a redirect. If you think the articles belong here, it looks like you'll need to recreate them because consensus shows that [[User:Bryn Morgan|Bryn Morgan]]'s versions of the articles don't meet Wikipedia's standards.  +++$+++ :::Well, San Diego Padres Radio Network has been speedily deleted again with much agreement at its [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Diego Padres Radio Network|AFD]], and New York Mets Radio Network has been made into a redirect. If you think the articles belong here, it looks like you'll need to recreate them because consensus shows that [[User:Bryn Morgan|Bryn Morgan]]'s versions of the articles don't meet Wikipedia's standards. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

269622 +++$+++ Kernel Saunters +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-15 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.237143360E09 +++$+++ Re:[[Hew  Pike]], can you clarify your comments [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_March_13|here]]. The quote is from the last paragraph of the citation.  +++$+++ Re:[[Hew  Pike]], can you clarify your comments [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_March_13|here]]. The quote is from the last paragraph of the citation. [[User:Kernel Saunters|Kernel Saunters]] ([[User talk:Kernel Saunters|talk]]) 11:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
269623 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269622 +++$+++ 269622 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.237147740E09 +++$+++ What I meant was that the quote \"cool example and inspiring leadership\" was referenced as I understand it, by the website http:\/\/www.london-gazette.co.uk\/issues\/49134\/supplements\/12844. However, although I could get the website only a few times out of several tries, the quote did not appear on the web page, as far as I could determine. Therefore, the quote was unsourced. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :What I meant was that the quote "cool example and inspiring leadership" was referenced as I understand it, by the website http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/49134/supplements/12844. However, although I could get the website only a few times out of several tries, the quote did not appear on the web page, as far as I could determine. Therefore, the quote was unsourced. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
269624 +++$+++ Kernel Saunters +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269622 +++$+++ 269623 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.237182420E09 +++$+++ Can I be a pain and ask you take a second look. The quote is contained on the second column and is the last paragragh of Pike's citation, \"Lieutenant Colonel Pike's cool example and inspiring leadership........etc. If there are still issues here I'll change the hook. Cheers  +++$+++ ::Can I be a pain and ask you take a second look. The quote is contained on the second column and is the last paragragh of Pike's citation, "Lieutenant Colonel Pike's cool example and inspiring leadership........etc. If there are still issues here I'll change the hook. Cheers [[User:Kernel Saunters|Kernel Saunters]] ([[User talk:Kernel Saunters|talk]]) 22:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
269625 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269622 +++$+++ 269624 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.237183080E09 +++$+++ I just looked again, but this time I cannot get the webpage. Just the black bar that says \"Gazette Issue 49134 published on the 8 October 1982. Page 14 of 36\" but nothing under it. However, If you say that it is there, then I will take your word on good faith. &mdash; +++$+++ :::I just looked again, but this time I cannot get the webpage. Just the black bar that says "Gazette Issue 49134 published on the 8 October 1982. Page 14 of 36" but nothing under it. However, If you say that it is there, then I will take your word on good faith. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
269626 +++$+++ Kernel Saunters +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269622 +++$+++ 269625 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.237183380E09 +++$+++ The page displays as PDF which has caused me issues in the past. I've just tried the page and it worked for me. The ref is defo there, I don't mind emailed a screen shot or the text if that would help  +++$+++ :::: The page displays as PDF which has caused me issues in the past. I've just tried the page and it worked for me. The ref is defo there, I don't mind emailed a screen shot or the text if that would help [[User:Kernel Saunters|Kernel Saunters]] ([[User talk:Kernel Saunters|talk]]) 23:03, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
269627 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269622 +++$+++ 269626 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.237183860E09 +++$+++ I will take your word for it.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I will take your word for it.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

531767 +++$+++ Decltype +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531767 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-12 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.236875160E09 +++$+++ Oops, did I put the incorrect tag? It was previously deleted per G11 so I just put the same tag. <tt> +++$+++ Oops, did I put the incorrect tag? It was previously deleted per G11 so I just put the same tag. <tt>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</tt> ([[User talk:Decltype|talk]]) 09:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
531768 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531767 +++$+++ 531767 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.236875880E09 +++$+++ Yeah, the text was different - last time it was promoting his website, this time it wasn't promoting anything in particular. If Theo doesn't stop mentioning himself everywhere on Wikipedia soon, I don't think he'll be able to edit here for much longer.  +++$+++ :Yeah, the text was different - last time it was promoting his website, this time it wasn't promoting anything in particular. If Theo doesn't stop mentioning himself everywhere on Wikipedia soon, I don't think he'll be able to edit here for much longer. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 09:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
531769 +++$+++ Decltype +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531767 +++$+++ 531768 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 09:48:00 +++$+++ 1.236876480E09 +++$+++ Ahh yes, now I remember. Thanks! :) <tt> +++$+++ :: Ahh yes, now I remember. Thanks! :) <tt>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</tt> ([[User talk:Decltype|talk]]) 09:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

555213 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ 555213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-26 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.193391120E09 +++$+++ Hey. I've seen you around and was wondering if you'd be willing to consider adminship, as I'd certainly nom you at [[WP:RFA]]. Let me know of your decision.  +++$+++ Hey. I've seen you around and was wondering if you'd be willing to consider adminship, as I'd certainly nom you at [[WP:RFA]]. Let me know of your decision. [[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#060">'''''Wizardman'''''</span>]] 02:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
555214 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ 555213 +++$+++ 555213 +++$+++ 2007-10-26 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.193391780E09 +++$+++ No problem, just lemme know when you're ready.  +++$+++ :No problem, just lemme know when you're ready. [[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#060">'''''Wizardman'''''</span>]] 02:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
555215 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ 555213 +++$+++ 555214 +++$+++ 2007-10-26 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.193457600E09 +++$+++ Just asking one quick question since it'll probably be asked at RfA. Do you know the difference between a block and a ban?  +++$+++ ::Just asking one quick question since it'll probably be asked at RfA. Do you know the difference between a block and a ban? [[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#060">'''''Wizardman'''''</span>]] 21:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
555216 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ 555213 +++$+++ 555213 +++$+++ 2007-10-29 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.193685420E09 +++$+++ Yes, I went and read your question. You kinda have the idea down, for a more accurate answer (and for the reason why I'm asking in the first place), see [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Remember the dot|here]]. The second question is no problem, you don't have to be a vandal patroller to be an admin.  +++$+++ *Yes, I went and read your question. You kinda have the idea down, for a more accurate answer (and for the reason why I'm asking in the first place), see [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Remember the dot|here]]. The second question is no problem, you don't have to be a vandal patroller to be an admin. [[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#060">'''''Wizardman'''''</span>]] 12:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

531770 +++$+++ Bearian +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531770 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-12 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.236901560E09 +++$+++ There are plenty of cites, see [[Talk:Smokestack america]].  +++$+++ There are plenty of cites, see [[Talk:Smokestack america]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 16:46, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
531771 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531770 +++$+++ 531770 +++$+++ 2009-03-13 09:17:00 +++$+++ 1.236961020E09 +++$+++ Looks heaps better, but is it still only a dictionary definition? I'll comment on the article's talk page.  +++$+++ :Looks heaps better, but is it still only a dictionary definition? I'll comment on the article's talk page. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 09:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

269628 +++$+++ Risker +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-16 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.237235280E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_article_review%2FRestoration_comedy&diff=277569756&oldid=277534684 this] comment by you assumes bad faith on the part of other editors.  Your tendency to assume bad faith was recently discussed at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/Mattisse_3 a Request for comment] on your editorial behaviour, and you appear to have agreed to stop making such assumptions of bad faith. Your failure to do so is problematic and interferes in the process of improving the encyclopedia. Please stop, and consider refactoring your comment above.   +++$+++ Mattisse, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AFeatured_article_review%2FRestoration_comedy&diff=277569756&oldid=277534684 this] comment by you assumes bad faith on the part of other editors.  Your tendency to assume bad faith was recently discussed at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Mattisse_3 a Request for comment] on your editorial behaviour, and you appear to have agreed to stop making such assumptions of bad faith. Your failure to do so is problematic and interferes in the process of improving the encyclopedia. Please stop, and consider refactoring your comment above.  [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 13:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269629 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269628 +++$+++ 269628 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.237239300E09 +++$+++ In the RFC you point to above against me, none of the allegations received wide community support. That RFC was an example of bad faith against me by another editor. I remind you that I voted against you in the  ArbCom election specifically because I see you as protecting entitled editors on Wikipedia, specifically the editors I think you are alluding to your post above. I commented at the time of my vote that this was the case. The three editors involved in the above \"warning\" from you about my assumption of bad faith, have repeatedly  assumed bad faith on my part, one to the extent of taking out that RFC against me, the other two by tag teaming and making a joke of my two FARC nominations and by repeated personal attacks against me, the most recent here:[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review\/Restoration_comedy&diff=277596206&oldid=277569756] (This editor, until a few days ago,  had an RFC open on him per Arbcom for just such behavior.) Since among the sins listed in the RFC against me were these two FARC nominations, and since one resulted in a '''delist''', it would make the RFC accusations seem in even more clearly in bad faith if the second FARC also resulted in a '''delist'''. Now the generator of the RFC is stating once again that the second article should not result in a '''delist''', although he has done nothing to help the article in the 1 1\/2 months it has been on FARC, while he has generated a plethora of new articles and DYKs in the meantime. If you read through the FARC, you will numerous comments assuming bad faith on my part. You did not comment or intervene to help me at any of those points. Consequently,    I do not see you as neutral in this matter. Therefore, I think in the interest of fairness, neutrality, and avoiding the appearance of bias, you should refrain from commenting about me in this matter. Perhaps you might address the recent uncivil behavior of this same editor toward another, innocent editor on FARC [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review\/Restoration_comedy&diff=prev&oldid=277534684]  rather than protecting this long standing editor with a record of incivility. This persistent behavior, despite an arbitration case and the recently closed RFC,  is  far worse than anything I am doing. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ : In the RFC you point to above against me, none of the allegations received wide community support. That RFC was an example of bad faith against me by another editor. I remind you that I voted against you in the  ArbCom election specifically because I see you as protecting entitled editors on Wikipedia, specifically the editors I think you are alluding to your post above. I commented at the time of my vote that this was the case. The three editors involved in the above "warning" from you about my assumption of bad faith, have repeatedly  assumed bad faith on my part, one to the extent of taking out that RFC against me, the other two by tag teaming and making a joke of my two FARC nominations and by repeated personal attacks against me, the most recent here:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/Restoration_comedy&diff=277596206&oldid=277569756] (This editor, until a few days ago,  had an RFC open on him per Arbcom for just such behavior.) Since among the sins listed in the RFC against me were these two FARC nominations, and since one resulted in a '''delist''', it would make the RFC accusations seem in even more clearly in bad faith if the second FARC also resulted in a '''delist'''. Now the generator of the RFC is stating once again that the second article should not result in a '''delist''', although he has done nothing to help the article in the 1 1/2 months it has been on FARC, while he has generated a plethora of new articles and DYKs in the meantime. If you read through the FARC, you will numerous comments assuming bad faith on my part. You did not comment or intervene to help me at any of those points. Consequently,    I do not see you as neutral in this matter. Therefore, I think in the interest of fairness, neutrality, and avoiding the appearance of bias, you should refrain from commenting about me in this matter. Perhaps you might address the recent uncivil behavior of this same editor toward another, innocent editor on FARC [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/Restoration_comedy&diff=prev&oldid=277534684]  rather than protecting this long standing editor with a record of incivility. This persistent behavior, despite an arbitration case and the recently closed RFC,  is  far worse than anything I am doing. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

7485 +++$+++ Jake V +++$+++ DocYako +++$+++ 7485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.289940480E09 +++$+++ The archived version offers many advantages; For example, if you go to GenLt Wilhelm von Altrock from the non-archived version you'll end up [http:\/\/geocities.com\/Pentagon\/bunker\/7729\/WEHRMACHT\/HEER\/Generalleutnant\/ALTROCK_WILHELM.html here], while the [http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101116123945\/http:\/\/geocities.com\/Pentagon\/bunker\/7729\/WEHRMACHT\/HEER\/Generalleutnant\/ALTROCK_WILHELM.html archived version] makes the image appear, too. It will also prevent a massive \"link-death\" when Geocities becomes unaccessible. All the best and carry on your precious contributions! -- +++$+++ The archived version offers many advantages; For example, if you go to GenLt Wilhelm von Altrock from the non-archived version you'll end up [http://geocities.com/Pentagon/bunker/7729/WEHRMACHT/HEER/Generalleutnant/ALTROCK_WILHELM.html here], while the [http://web.archive.org/web/20101116123945/http://geocities.com/Pentagon/bunker/7729/WEHRMACHT/HEER/Generalleutnant/ALTROCK_WILHELM.html archived version] makes the image appear, too. It will also prevent a massive "link-death" when Geocities becomes unaccessible. All the best and carry on your precious contributions! --[[User:Jake V|Jake V]] ([[User talk:Jake V|talk]]) 12:48, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
7486 +++$+++ Jake V +++$+++ DocYako +++$+++ 7485 +++$+++ 7485 +++$+++ 2010-11-17 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.290025800E09 +++$+++ Also, if you want, when you come across an officer whose name was referenced in the Wehrmachtbericht, you could notify me so I can add the respective text(s). Best regards! -- +++$+++ :Also, if you want, when you come across an officer whose name was referenced in the Wehrmachtbericht, you could notify me so I can add the respective text(s). Best regards! --[[User:Jake V|Jake V]] ([[User talk:Jake V|talk]]) 12:30, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

269630 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269630 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-13 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.236928920E09 +++$+++ Well, eh, thanks anyway ;) All you points were taken on board in a general sence, and not just with the specific instances you raised. About a month needed, I think, before we take it back. Onwards!  +++$+++ Well, eh, thanks anyway ;) All you points were taken on board in a general sence, and not just with the specific instances you raised. About a month needed, I think, before we take it back. Onwards! [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 00:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
269631 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269630 +++$+++ 269630 +++$+++ 2009-03-13 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.236929400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the acknowledgement and the reassurance that I am not a bad guy! My intent was certainly not to deep six your article. And Fowler&Fowler is a very good editor, very conscientious.   I am confused as to why, or even if, your article was removed. There was never an explanation, and it has not been archived, per the usual routine. Are you sure that it's disappearance from the FA list is not some kind of mistake? Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks for the acknowledgement and the reassurance that I am not a bad guy! My intent was certainly not to deep six your article. And Fowler&Fowler is a very good editor, very conscientious.   I am confused as to why, or even if, your article was removed. There was never an explanation, and it has not been archived, per the usual routine. Are you sure that it's disappearance from the FA list is not some kind of mistake? Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
269632 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269630 +++$+++ 269631 +++$+++ 2009-03-13 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.237004940E09 +++$+++ It was kind of a relief to be honest when it closed, I think once things get steamy its probably best to give it a rest. I have no porblem with an intense review once its constructive (actually thoes can be very rewarding given that they lead to vast improvement in a short space of time) but maybe we were beyond that. These things happen. (O and gimme hasn't run yet to archive closed noms is all). By the way I agree about Fowler&Fowler, he is being most helpful to us. Anyway, talk later.  +++$+++ ::It was kind of a relief to be honest when it closed, I think once things get steamy its probably best to give it a rest. I have no porblem with an intense review once its constructive (actually thoes can be very rewarding given that they lead to vast improvement in a short space of time) but maybe we were beyond that. These things happen. (O and gimme hasn't run yet to archive closed noms is all). By the way I agree about Fowler&Fowler, he is being most helpful to us. Anyway, talk later. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 21:29, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
269633 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269630 +++$+++ 269632 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.237172880E09 +++$+++ Compliments to  you on the way you handled the whole thing. You were very constructive all around  and made me feel much better, and hopefully Fowler&Fowler also.  I see that Awadewit is doing a great job editing the article. I predict your next run through will be a piece of cake!  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Compliments to  you on the way you handled the whole thing. You were very constructive all around  and made me feel much better, and hopefully Fowler&Fowler also.  I see that Awadewit is doing a great job editing the article. I predict your next run through will be a piece of cake!  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
269634 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269630 +++$+++ 269630 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.237290240E09 +++$+++ Steady there with the predictions. My experience of life and espically wiki is that it smites such grand hopes. Lets tread carefully.  +++$+++ :Steady there with the predictions. My experience of life and espically wiki is that it smites such grand hopes. Lets tread carefully. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 04:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

531778 +++$+++ 69.119.113.6 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531778 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-14 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.237067280E09 +++$+++ Plus the original 3 sources... [[Special:Contributions\/69.119.113.6|69.119.113.6]] ( +++$+++ Plus the original 3 sources... [[Special:Contributions/69.119.113.6|69.119.113.6]] ([[User talk:69.119.113.6|talk]]) 14:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
531779 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531778 +++$+++ 531778 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.237128000E09 +++$+++ But none of those links or the original three sources work, so we have no way of [[WP:V|verifying]] the information. I will check some news databases and see if I can find anything. If we can't, then we have to remove the section.  +++$+++ :But none of those links or the original three sources work, so we have no way of [[WP:V|verifying]] the information. I will check some news databases and see if I can find anything. If we can't, then we have to remove the section. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 07:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
531780 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531778 +++$+++ 531779 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.237129560E09 +++$+++ Google News doesn't show a single hit in its archive about this issue in relation to Stephens,[http:\/\/news.google.com.au\/archivesearch?q=%22willis+stephens%22+galante+&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=au&hl=en] and I've searched two online news databases and found nothing. All I have found is one article where his political opponent accuses Stephens of the conflict of interest,[http:\/\/ncnlocal.com\/archives\/archives_2006\/8-23-06\/topstory.htm] (which I linked to before on the article's talk page) but it doesn't appear that the newspaper or anyone neutral and reliable investigated the allegations. I couldn't care less about Stephens, but I do care about the [[WP:biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons]] policy -- there's no way we can keep this uncited negative section in his article.  +++$+++ ::Google News doesn't show a single hit in its archive about this issue in relation to Stephens,[http://news.google.com.au/archivesearch?q=%22willis+stephens%22+galante+&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=au&hl=en] and I've searched two online news databases and found nothing. All I have found is one article where his political opponent accuses Stephens of the conflict of interest,[http://ncnlocal.com/archives/archives_2006/8-23-06/topstory.htm] (which I linked to before on the article's talk page) but it doesn't appear that the newspaper or anyone neutral and reliable investigated the allegations. I couldn't care less about Stephens, but I do care about the [[WP:biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons]] policy -- there's no way we can keep this uncited negative section in his article. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

269635 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-16 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.237190400E09 +++$+++ You may want to take another look at Chotiner.  He is like Speer in a way, he is the kind of technocrat who was very good at what he did and was rather amoral.  There's no redemption in Chotiner's story though, as there kinda is in Speer's and in Wolters' as well, come to think of it.  I really like the nice little bit I dug up about his 1938 Assembly race, read it and see.-- +++$+++ You may want to take another look at Chotiner.  He is like Speer in a way, he is the kind of technocrat who was very good at what he did and was rather amoral.  There's no redemption in Chotiner's story though, as there kinda is in Speer's and in Wolters' as well, come to think of it.  I really like the nice little bit I dug up about his 1938 Assembly race, read it and see.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:00, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269636 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269635 +++$+++ 269635 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.237190880E09 +++$+++ I will. But I am sick to death of Nixon, and nothing seems new in the recent surge of Nixon info. And it was the fact that Speer was not unambiguously evil that made him interesting.  (I noticed your \"shocking\" hook re [[Centre Praying Colonels football]]!)  &mdash; +++$+++ :I will. But I am sick to death of Nixon, and nothing seems new in the recent surge of Nixon info. And it was the fact that Speer was not unambiguously evil that made him interesting.  (I noticed your "shocking" hook re [[Centre Praying Colonels football]]!)  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269637 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269635 +++$+++ 269636 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.237191600E09 +++$+++ I like people like that.  I wish I could find another Speer, but they are thin on the ground.-- +++$+++ ::I like people like that.  I wish I could find another Speer, but they are thin on the ground.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269638 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269635 +++$+++ 269637 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.237192380E09 +++$+++ It looks like [[Rudolf Wolters]] has passed. That is a very good article also. Its quality was overlook at FAC. It is his ambiguity over Speer that makes him interesting. His behavior toward Speer has an emotional quality that is incongruous. Now if I read that Chotiner was genuinely fond of Nixon, that would be intriguing. &mdash; +++$+++ :::It looks like [[Rudolf Wolters]] has passed. That is a very good article also. Its quality was overlook at FAC. It is his ambiguity over Speer that makes him interesting. His behavior toward Speer has an emotional quality that is incongruous. Now if I read that Chotiner was genuinely fond of Nixon, that would be intriguing. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269639 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269635 +++$+++ 269638 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.237192560E09 +++$+++ I will see what I can find on that subject.  Usually when I write about someone, he's left memoirs or letters or something.  Chotiner did not.  I think Wolters is still waiting an image review.  Unless they question fair use on the ID photo, we shoudl be fine.-- +++$+++ ::::I will see what I can find on that subject.  Usually when I write about someone, he's left memoirs or letters or something.  Chotiner did not.  I think Wolters is still waiting an image review.  Unless they question fair use on the ID photo, we shoudl be fine.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269640 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269635 +++$+++ 269639 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.237192980E09 +++$+++ It is still waiting, but it will pass as things stand now. FAC reviewing has slowed to a crawl. I would vote except that I am named as a nominator. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::It is still waiting, but it will pass as things stand now. FAC reviewing has slowed to a crawl. I would vote except that I am named as a nominator. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269641 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269635 +++$+++ 269640 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.237193460E09 +++$+++ It will be fine.  Slightly to my surprise.  I guess with Albert Speer's help, one can do anything, as Wolters himself said.  After this I will nom Lane, and then Chotiner, probably.  I really want that centennial TFA in October.  The problem with Chotiner is that he never really discussed his inner feelings to anyone, that I can see, and there are implications in the White House tapes that he wasn't in the loop on Watergate, but nothing definite (of course, since he nailed Voorhis and Douglas, some saw him as evil incarnate on general principles)  Haldeman told Nixon on the tapes that Chotiner wasn't \"wired in\", but I can't find any sources interpreting that.-- +++$+++ ::::::It will be fine.  Slightly to my surprise.  I guess with Albert Speer's help, one can do anything, as Wolters himself said.  After this I will nom Lane, and then Chotiner, probably.  I really want that centennial TFA in October.  The problem with Chotiner is that he never really discussed his inner feelings to anyone, that I can see, and there are implications in the White House tapes that he wasn't in the loop on Watergate, but nothing definite (of course, since he nailed Voorhis and Douglas, some saw him as evil incarnate on general principles)  Haldeman told Nixon on the tapes that Chotiner wasn't "wired in", but I can't find any sources interpreting that.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269642 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269635 +++$+++ 269641 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.237193760E09 +++$+++ I thought you already tried Lane? Are you going to do a \"cram down\"? &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::I thought you already tried Lane? Are you going to do a "cram down"? &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269643 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269635 +++$+++ 269642 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.237194240E09 +++$+++ It had one support, no opposes when Sandy called time on it.  I've done some work on it, mostly in article structure and images, and I'm prepared to try it again.-- +++$+++ ::::::::It had one support, no opposes when Sandy called time on it.  I've done some work on it, mostly in article structure and images, and I'm prepared to try it again.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 02:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269644 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269635 +++$+++ 269643 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.237194720E09 +++$+++ One support... Maybe you should wait until there is more activity on FAC. There are calls on the talk page of putting a do-or-die time line on FACs. It is so bogged down now. I will take a new look at Lane. But to be honest, I have not been able to read the article through so far.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::One support... Maybe you should wait until there is more activity on FAC. There are calls on the talk page of putting a do-or-die time line on FACs. It is so bogged down now. I will take a new look at Lane. But to be honest, I have not been able to read the article through so far.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269645 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269635 +++$+++ 269644 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.237197420E09 +++$+++ If only interesting people got FA's written about them, then what's the point of having a complete encyclopedia?  Incidently, I just bought some articles from the Washington Post, and they paint a very interesting view of Chotiner.  Even the Post felt that Chotiner didn't know about Watergate.  There's now the image of this guy who is a friend of Nixon but not really in the loop, and of course he turns out to be right when he calls Watergate \"stupid\".  Interesting.-- +++$+++ ::::::::::If only interesting people got FA's written about them, then what's the point of having a complete encyclopedia?  Incidently, I just bought some articles from the Washington Post, and they paint a very interesting view of Chotiner.  Even the Post felt that Chotiner didn't know about Watergate.  There's now the image of this guy who is a friend of Nixon but not really in the loop, and of course he turns out to be right when he calls Watergate "stupid".  Interesting.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 02:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

531781 +++$+++  +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531781 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-14 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.237076400E09 +++$+++ The artist's article does ''not'' exist, it's just a redirect to the album. I still think it's a pretty clear cut A9 that doesn't need to slog its way through AfD.  +++$+++ The artist's article does ''not'' exist, it's just a redirect to the album. I still think it's a pretty clear cut A9 that doesn't need to slog its way through AfD. [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 17:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
531782 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531781 +++$+++ 531781 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.237125960E09 +++$+++ Oh, I thought the band was [[Mindless Self Indulgence]], but now I see it's a side project of that band.  +++$+++ :Oh, I thought the band was [[Mindless Self Indulgence]], but now I see it's a side project of that band. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 07:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

7494 +++$+++ DocYako +++$+++ DocYako +++$+++ 7494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-25 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.309055700E09 +++$+++ Franz Jasiek was not just decorated with the Iron Cross, he was awarded the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross which was one of Germany's highest decorations for bravery and valour.  In my opinion that has some notability.   +++$+++ Franz Jasiek was not just decorated with the Iron Cross, he was awarded the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross which was one of Germany's highest decorations for bravery and valour.  In my opinion that has some notability.  [[User:DocYako|DocYako]] ([[User talk:DocYako|talk]]) 19:35, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
7495 +++$+++ DonaldDuck +++$+++ DocYako +++$+++ 7494 +++$+++ 7494 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.309079100E09 +++$+++ But is he known for anything else, apart from Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross? -- +++$+++ :But is he known for anything else, apart from Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross? --[[User:DonaldDuck|DonaldDuck]] ([[User talk:DonaldDuck|talk]]) 02:05, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

531783 +++$+++ Steven Walling +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531783 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-15 08:40:00 +++$+++ 1.237131600E09 +++$+++ I'd prefer if you'd add a decent reference, but I'll restore it since I'll admit that I'm not 100% sure about whether the team she played for meets WP:ATHLETE. <font style=\"font-family: Lucida Grande\"> +++$+++ I'd prefer if you'd add a decent reference, but I'll restore it since I'll admit that I'm not 100% sure about whether the team she played for meets WP:ATHLETE. <font style="font-family: Lucida Grande">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]] [[User talk:Steven Walling|(talk)]]</font> 08:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
531784 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531783 +++$+++ 531783 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.237132440E09 +++$+++ Replied on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Steven_Walling&diff=prev&oldid=277365352 Steven Walling's talk page].  +++$+++ :Replied on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Steven_Walling&diff=prev&oldid=277365352 Steven Walling's talk page]. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 08:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

7497 +++$+++ MisterBee1966 +++$+++ DocYako +++$+++ 7497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311641520E09 +++$+++ I have a question for you. By definition a recipient of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross is also a recipient of the Iron Cross. Do you think that we have to add both categories to the articles? I have always refrained from doing this but I am a bit unsure now that you started doing this.  +++$+++ I have a question for you. By definition a recipient of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross is also a recipient of the Iron Cross. Do you think that we have to add both categories to the articles? I have always refrained from doing this but I am a bit unsure now that you started doing this. [[User:MisterBee1966|MisterBee1966]] ([[User talk:MisterBee1966|talk]]) 17:52, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
7498 +++$+++ MisterBee1966 +++$+++ DocYako +++$+++ 7497 +++$+++ 7497 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.311730020E09 +++$+++ I posted the question [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Categorizing|here]]  +++$+++ : I posted the question [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Categorizing|here]] [[User:MisterBee1966|MisterBee1966]] ([[User talk:MisterBee1966|talk]]) 18:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

531787 +++$+++ Moorec4 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-16 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.237253160E09 +++$+++ Somno; Re MacDonald & Kahn I have contacted family to see if they will create page for MacDonald...as well Tex Thornton page needs work.. I will pursue family to see if they might help-- +++$+++ Somno; Re MacDonald & Kahn I have contacted family to see if they will create page for MacDonald...as well Tex Thornton page needs work.. I will pursue family to see if they might help--[[User:Moorec4|charles moore]] ([[User talk:Moorec4|talk]]) 18:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
531788 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531787 +++$+++ 531787 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.237287120E09 +++$+++ Hi Charles. There was no content in this article so I'm not sure whether it would be appropriate for Wikipedia. It is preferable if articles aren't created by family members, who have a [[WP:conflict of interest|conflict of interest]]. Just make sure the articles are [[WP:NPOV|neutral]] and [[WP:V|reliably sourced]] before posting to avoid them being deleted, or draft them in [[WP:USER|userspace]] and ask other editors to have a look first.  +++$+++ :Hi Charles. There was no content in this article so I'm not sure whether it would be appropriate for Wikipedia. It is preferable if articles aren't created by family members, who have a [[WP:conflict of interest|conflict of interest]]. Just make sure the articles are [[WP:NPOV|neutral]] and [[WP:V|reliably sourced]] before posting to avoid them being deleted, or draft them in [[WP:USER|userspace]] and ask other editors to have a look first. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

531789 +++$+++ Moorec4 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-23 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.237798980E09 +++$+++ When I started \"Wiking \" a month ago Gatoclass set me up with a SandBox where I built a page. When the family is ready to write the story (who better?) then lets set em up with sandbox.  I wrote (with tons of help from Gatoclass & Nuero) Charles E Moore as impartially as i could , then Gato edited.....  --[[Special:Contributions\/24.5.23.95|24.5.23.95]] ([[User talk:24.5.23.95|talk]]) 02:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)-- +++$+++ When I started "Wiking " a month ago Gatoclass set me up with a SandBox where I built a page. When the family is ready to write the story (who better?) then lets set em up with sandbox.  I wrote (with tons of help from Gatoclass & Nuero) Charles E Moore as impartially as i could , then Gato edited.....  --[[Special:Contributions/24.5.23.95|24.5.23.95]] ([[User talk:24.5.23.95|talk]]) 02:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)--[[User:Moorec4|charles moore]] ([[User talk:Moorec4|talk]]) 02:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
531790 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531789 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-24 10:15:00 +++$+++ 1.237914900E09 +++$+++ Yes, that is a good plan and definitely what MacDonald's family should do.  +++$+++ ::Yes, that is a good plan and definitely what MacDonald's family should do. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 10:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

7502 +++$+++ Miserlou +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-07 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.204946940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Miserlou|Miserlou]] ([[User talk:Miserlou|talk]]) 19:29, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
7503 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7502 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.188288240E09 +++$+++ Glad you liked it. I think it would be cool to have my name (Benjamin Small) on your thesis.  +++$+++ ::Glad you liked it. I think it would be cool to have my name (Benjamin Small) on your thesis. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] 01:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
7504 +++$+++ ShawnDouglas +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7502 +++$+++ 7502 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.173533580E09 +++$+++ Awesome, thanks again.  I'd pretty much worked out a similar strategy, but yours is a little more succinct.  -- +++$+++ :Awesome, thanks again.  I'd pretty much worked out a similar strategy, but yours is a little more succinct.  --[[User:ShawnDouglas|smd]] 05:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
7505 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7502 +++$+++ 7504 +++$+++ 2007-03-31 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.175398020E09 +++$+++ BTW, Jmol can be modified to export pre-coded POV-Ray files like this.  +++$+++ ::BTW, Jmol can be modified to export pre-coded POV-Ray files like this. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] 20:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

531791 +++$+++ 86.155.212.21 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531791 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-17 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.237326240E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/86.155.212.21|86.155.212.21]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/86.155.212.21|86.155.212.21]] ([[User talk:86.155.212.21|talk]]) 14:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
531792 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531791 +++$+++ 531791 +++$+++ 2009-03-18 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.237395000E09 +++$+++ Hi, I have moved the article here: [[User:Rosewood 999\/The Train That Never Came]]. It is a sub-page of your userspace, separate to the talk page.  You might like to take a look at some of the [[WP:FA|Featured Articles]] for some inspiration - they have been judged the \"best\" of Wikipedia and are very comprehensive, well-written and well-sourced. You don't need to get ''The Train That Never Came'' up to anywhere near the same level, but it might give you some tips about content and encyclopedic tone\/writing style? A few examples I've found are: ''[[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]]'', ''[[To Kill a Mockingbird]]'', ''[[Romeo and Juliet]]'' and ''[[Bone Sharps, Cowboys, and Thunder Lizards]]''. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi, I have moved the article here: [[User:Rosewood 999/The Train That Never Came]]. It is a sub-page of your userspace, separate to the talk page.  You might like to take a look at some of the [[WP:FA|Featured Articles]] for some inspiration - they have been judged the "best" of Wikipedia and are very comprehensive, well-written and well-sourced. You don't need to get ''The Train That Never Came'' up to anywhere near the same level, but it might give you some tips about content and encyclopedic tone/writing style? A few examples I've found are: ''[[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]]'', ''[[To Kill a Mockingbird]]'', ''[[Romeo and Juliet]]'' and ''[[Bone Sharps, Cowboys, and Thunder Lizards]]''. Regards, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 09:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
531793 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531791 +++$+++ 531791 +++$+++ 2009-03-18 10:06:00 +++$+++ 1.237395960E09 +++$+++ Hi Snd33083. The article didn't state why he is important\/significant - from what I could see when I reviewed the speedy deletion tag, he provides movie reviews on a local radio station, he hosted a TV show on a local unnamed station, he released a short film and a short documentary through self-publication, and the cited source just confirmed that Dennis Willis exists. Perhaps I misunderstood the content, but if so, that shows it wasn't clear enough why Dennis and his achievements are significant and should be included in Wikipedia. I have userfied the article here for you to work on: [[User:Snd33083\/Dennis Willis]]. Please let me know if you need assistance with anything. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Snd33083. The article didn't state why he is important/significant - from what I could see when I reviewed the speedy deletion tag, he provides movie reviews on a local radio station, he hosted a TV show on a local unnamed station, he released a short film and a short documentary through self-publication, and the cited source just confirmed that Dennis Willis exists. Perhaps I misunderstood the content, but if so, that shows it wasn't clear enough why Dennis and his achievements are significant and should be included in Wikipedia. I have userfied the article here for you to work on: [[User:Snd33083/Dennis Willis]]. Please let me know if you need assistance with anything. Regards, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 10:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

531794 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-18 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.237409580E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 13:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
531795 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531794 +++$+++ 531794 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.237630680E09 +++$+++ Places are much more interesting than plants. :) I will take a proper look when I have some more time (shouldn't be on here at all at the moment; just checking my talk page and watchlist!)  +++$+++ :Places are much more interesting than plants. :) I will take a proper look when I have some more time (shouldn't be on here at all at the moment; just checking my talk page and watchlist!) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
531796 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531794 +++$+++ 531794 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.237630740E09 +++$+++ Hmmm I said that 4 hours ago :(  +++$+++ :Hmmm I said that 4 hours ago :( [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 03:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
531797 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531794 +++$+++ 531796 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.237630860E09 +++$+++ The last time I came on \"just to check my watchlist\" I was on here for about six hours, so I hope I do better this time.  +++$+++ ::The last time I came on "just to check my watchlist" I was on here for about six hours, so I hope I do better this time. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
531798 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531794 +++$+++ 531797 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.237631160E09 +++$+++ 12 step programs for wikiholics are needed :( Im a good candidate - thank god and others I have to go out in a few minutes  +++$+++ :::12 step programs for wikiholics are needed :( Im a good candidate - thank god and others I have to go out in a few minutes [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 03:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

7508 +++$+++ EldKatt +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7508 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-20 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.198191660E09 +++$+++ Your image [[:Image:Monte carlo method.png]] was discussed on [[Talk:Monte Carlo method#Battleships_diagram|Talk:Monte Carlo method]] a couple of months ago. The question of what it actually means was raised, and has not really been answered. I came across the image today and couldn't make any sense of it either. I would be glad if you would take a look at the discussion and answer or edit an explanation into the article as appropriate. Thanks,  +++$+++ Your image [[:Image:Monte carlo method.png]] was discussed on [[Talk:Monte Carlo method#Battleships_diagram|Talk:Monte Carlo method]] a couple of months ago. The question of what it actually means was raised, and has not really been answered. I came across the image today and couldn't make any sense of it either. I would be glad if you would take a look at the discussion and answer or edit an explanation into the article as appropriate. Thanks, [[User:EldKatt|EldKatt]] <small>([[User talk:EldKatt|Talk]])</small> 15:01, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
7509 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7508 +++$+++ 7508 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.198197060E09 +++$+++ I just added a caption.  +++$+++ :I just added a caption. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 16:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

569230 +++$+++ Foo12 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-24 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.164370980E09 +++$+++ Hello i am fairly new how do you become an administrator? thanks -- +++$+++ Hello i am fairly new how do you become an administrator? thanks --[[User:Foo12|&quot;P-Machine&quot;]] 04:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
569231 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569230 +++$+++ 569230 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.164376800E09 +++$+++ You can read [[:Wikipedia:Administrators]] and [[:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship]].  If you have less than ~2500 edits then I wouldn't go for the position cold as you probably don't have enough experience to satisfy the majority of the contributors at RfA.  To prepare for the position, you should continue to contribute to all relevant areas of Wikipedia - the main Article space, the project space (pages beginning with Wikipedia) and the user space (Talk pages).  Admins have three powers; to block users from editing, to protect pages from being edited and to restore deleted pages.  You can participate in admin related duties by patrolling the New and Recent Changes pages and spotting and tagging pages for deletion based upon the criteria found at [[:WP:CSD]].  You can also warn vandals when you tag their pages.  If you haven't done this before then I would watch the pages and see how people actually patrol.  I would also watch the [[:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion]] and [[:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]] to see how people perform the tasks and back their opinions up with [[:Wikipedia:Policy|policies and guidelines]].  You can also report persistent vandals to [[:WP:AIV|the administrators' intervention noticeboard]].  When you have done some of the above, you can also sign up for [[:Wikipedia:Esperanza\/Admin coaching|Admin coaching]] for future guidance.  It's best just to learn how to contribute effectively to the encyclopedia first, which means encyclopedic content, references, sources and cleaning up language.  Regards,  +++$+++ :You can read [[:Wikipedia:Administrators]] and [[:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship]].  If you have less than ~2500 edits then I wouldn't go for the position cold as you probably don't have enough experience to satisfy the majority of the contributors at RfA.  To prepare for the position, you should continue to contribute to all relevant areas of Wikipedia - the main Article space, the project space (pages beginning with Wikipedia) and the user space (Talk pages).  Admins have three powers; to block users from editing, to protect pages from being edited and to restore deleted pages.  You can participate in admin related duties by patrolling the New and Recent Changes pages and spotting and tagging pages for deletion based upon the criteria found at [[:WP:CSD]].  You can also warn vandals when you tag their pages.  If you haven't done this before then I would watch the pages and see how people actually patrol.  I would also watch the [[:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion]] and [[:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]] to see how people perform the tasks and back their opinions up with [[:Wikipedia:Policy|policies and guidelines]].  You can also report persistent vandals to [[:WP:AIV|the administrators' intervention noticeboard]].  When you have done some of the above, you can also sign up for [[:Wikipedia:Esperanza/Admin coaching|Admin coaching]] for future guidance.  It's best just to learn how to contribute effectively to the encyclopedia first, which means encyclopedic content, references, sources and cleaning up language.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 06:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

531799 +++$+++ Rosewood 999 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531799 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-19 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.237483260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Rosewood 999|Rosewood 999]] ([[User talk:Rosewood 999|talk]]) 10:21, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
531800 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531799 +++$+++ 531799 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.237631280E09 +++$+++ Looks great! The tone and structure are much more encyclopedic. The only thing it still needs are [[WP:V|references]] from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] about the book (for example, book reviews that discuss the book's themes). Referenced articles are much less likely to be deleted or taken to [[WP:articles for deletion|articles for deletion]]. Great job so far; it's really impressive. When you have some references, I'll take another look but it should be ready to go back to mainspace. :)  +++$+++ :Looks great! The tone and structure are much more encyclopedic. The only thing it still needs are [[WP:V|references]] from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] about the book (for example, book reviews that discuss the book's themes). Referenced articles are much less likely to be deleted or taken to [[WP:articles for deletion|articles for deletion]]. Great job so far; it's really impressive. When you have some references, I'll take another look but it should be ready to go back to mainspace. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

269656 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-16 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.237249020E09 +++$+++ Casliber's request for ten days does come a little tardy; you have a point there.  Yet Wikipedia isn't on a deadline.  It's so much more gracious to say 'yes, best wishes with that' and hold back from expressing minor misgivings.  The article will get better (let's all hope) and the good faith may come back from more directions.  Best wishes, <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Casliber's request for ten days does come a little tardy; you have a point there.  Yet Wikipedia isn't on a deadline.  It's so much more gracious to say 'yes, best wishes with that' and hold back from expressing minor misgivings.  The article will get better (let's all hope) and the good faith may come back from more directions.  Best wishes, <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 17:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269657 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269656 +++$+++ 269656 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.237250400E09 +++$+++ Yes, the bad faith implicit in that RFC was shocking and has made me more callous, I fear, but also more realistic. I see now the Emperor is nude. He is wearing no clothes! Although \"a little tardy\", Casliber's request definitely is more weighty than all those other editors who bothered to assess the article objectively and  weigh in with a considered opinion. So it will be a huge  blow to his credibility if he does not massively improve [[Buckingham Palace]] now.  That would be a very good thing, as that article needs to be excellent if Wikipedia is to fulfill its responsibility to its readership, including school age children.  &mdash; +++$+++ : Yes, the bad faith implicit in that RFC was shocking and has made me more callous, I fear, but also more realistic. I see now the Emperor is nude. He is wearing no clothes! Although "a little tardy", Casliber's request definitely is more weighty than all those other editors who bothered to assess the article objectively and  weigh in with a considered opinion. So it will be a huge  blow to his credibility if he does not massively improve [[Buckingham Palace]] now.  That would be a very good thing, as that article needs to be excellent if Wikipedia is to fulfill its responsibility to its readership, including school age children.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269658 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269656 +++$+++ 269657 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.237262940E09 +++$+++ The best way you could repay the good faith I had in you at RFC would be to extend a little more good faith in others.  Or at least--if you really are jaded--perhaps a change of pace with content work?  I'll be starting a featured content nomination in the next hour (not an article though); it helps keep a sense of balance to concentrate on the positives when wiki conflicts get frustrating.  Regards, <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::The best way you could repay the good faith I had in you at RFC would be to extend a little more good faith in others.  Or at least--if you really are jaded--perhaps a change of pace with content work?  I'll be starting a featured content nomination in the next hour (not an article though); it helps keep a sense of balance to concentrate on the positives when wiki conflicts get frustrating.  Regards, <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 21:09, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269659 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269656 +++$+++ 269658 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.237263720E09 +++$+++ I have very good relationships with almost all editors. I get along very well at [[User:Mattisse\/GA|GAN]], DYK, and even FAC. It is only the clique on that particular article at Featured article review where there is a problem. Even other articles being reviewed there, such as [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Paleolithic diet]] I have no problems. Read my talk page if you doubt that. I dislike being accused of persistent bad faith when no one else has that problem with me outside of that clique of editors. What do you suggest, besides just accepting abuse from those particular editors?  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I have very good relationships with almost all editors. I get along very well at [[User:Mattisse/GA|GAN]], DYK, and even FAC. It is only the clique on that particular article at Featured article review where there is a problem. Even other articles being reviewed there, such as [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Paleolithic diet]] I have no problems. Read my talk page if you doubt that. I dislike being accused of persistent bad faith when no one else has that problem with me outside of that clique of editors. What do you suggest, besides just accepting abuse from those particular editors?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269660 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269656 +++$+++ 269659 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.237264620E09 +++$+++ Patience, along with eventualism and fairness, often go a long way.  Usually between established editors, even people who usually disagree with each other will have natural moments here and there when they see eye to eye.  It's good to recognize those moments.  Combined with that, drawing the line politely yet firmly on inappropriate behavior, and using site processes.  About three years ago when hardly anyone knew me and I was coping with two very difficult people (both of whom later got sitebanned), I started an essay that was basically a set of reminders of the person I wanted to be.  If you haven't already read [[Wikipedia:No angry mastodons]], have a look.  Quite a few people have added to it since then. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::Patience, along with eventualism and fairness, often go a long way.  Usually between established editors, even people who usually disagree with each other will have natural moments here and there when they see eye to eye.  It's good to recognize those moments.  Combined with that, drawing the line politely yet firmly on inappropriate behavior, and using site processes.  About three years ago when hardly anyone knew me and I was coping with two very difficult people (both of whom later got sitebanned), I started an essay that was basically a set of reminders of the person I wanted to be.  If you haven't already read [[Wikipedia:No angry mastodons]], have a look.  Quite a few people have added to it since then. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 21:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269661 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269656 +++$+++ 269660 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.237266060E09 +++$+++ I have read it many times but will read it again. However, those who condone and encourage Giano are only harming Wikipedia and article quality. [[Buckingham Palace]] remains a disgrace because Giano is encouraged to   intimidate others to get his way. A poorly written FA will remain, an article that should be a shining jewel on Wikipedia, hardly a situation  to condone. [[Denial]] is a very effective [[defense mechanism]] for those who employ it. I am not a [[Pollyana]] and do not think that all of Wikipedia's problems can be swept under the rug.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I have read it many times but will read it again. However, those who condone and encourage Giano are only harming Wikipedia and article quality. [[Buckingham Palace]] remains a disgrace because Giano is encouraged to   intimidate others to get his way. A poorly written FA will remain, an article that should be a shining jewel on Wikipedia, hardly a situation  to condone. [[Denial]] is a very effective [[defense mechanism]] for those who employ it. I am not a [[Pollyana]] and do not think that all of Wikipedia's problems can be swept under the rug.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
269662 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269656 +++$+++ 269661 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.237273800E09 +++$+++ Well, Giano and I disagree more often than we agree.  Let's leave it at that.  Best to keep disagreements to the venues that are appropriate for it and make it as clear as possible that views posted in other contexts are strictly on the merits. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::::Well, Giano and I disagree more often than we agree.  Let's leave it at that.  Best to keep disagreements to the venues that are appropriate for it and make it as clear as possible that views posted in other contexts are strictly on the merits. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 00:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
269663 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269656 +++$+++ 269662 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.237274100E09 +++$+++ What other venues have I posted in? It was not my idea to bring it up in an RFC nor on my talk page. Other than a warning to Giano, I have not posted anything about this across venues. However, if persons like [[User:Sam Korn]] are going to continue to lecture me that being called a troll is not a personal attack, I will consider ANI. I really resent editors who feel they must lecture me on Giano's behalf. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::What other venues have I posted in? It was not my idea to bring it up in an RFC nor on my talk page. Other than a warning to Giano, I have not posted anything about this across venues. However, if persons like [[User:Sam Korn]] are going to continue to lecture me that being called a troll is not a personal attack, I will consider ANI. I really resent editors who feel they must lecture me on Giano's behalf. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

531801 +++$+++ Rosewood 999 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-21 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.237662420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Rosewood 999|Rosewood 999]] ([[User talk:Rosewood 999|talk]]) 12:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
531802 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531801 +++$+++ 531801 +++$+++ 2009-03-24 10:15:00 +++$+++ 1.237914900E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... I thought the book had been reviewed, but I'm not sure why I thought that (I must have imagined it! :). You are right that Amazon and Barnes & Noble reviews don't count. If you look at the [[Wikipedia:Notability_(books)#Criteria|notability criteria for books]], we need to show that the book meets one of those criterion.  +++$+++ :Hmmm... I thought the book had been reviewed, but I'm not sure why I thought that (I must have imagined it! :). You are right that Amazon and Barnes & Noble reviews don't count. If you look at the [[Wikipedia:Notability_(books)#Criteria|notability criteria for books]], we need to show that the book meets one of those criterion. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 10:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

7515 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-04 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.244100900E09 +++$+++ [[:File:G protein1.png]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:G protein1.png]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:G protein1.png]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:File:G protein1.png]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:G protein1.png]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:G protein1.png]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 00:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
7516 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7515 +++$+++ 7515 +++$+++ 2009-06-04 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.244101080E09 +++$+++ [[:File:G-protein-coupled receptor.png]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:G-protein-coupled receptor.png]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:G-protein-coupled receptor.png]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:G-protein-coupled receptor.png]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 00:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
7517 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7515 +++$+++ 7515 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.253848080E09 +++$+++ [[:File:X-ray crystallography.svg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:X-ray crystallography.svg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:X-ray crystallography.svg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:X-ray crystallography.svg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 20:08, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

7519 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7519 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-12 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.247388240E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Translation.gif]] is absolutely superb!  +++$+++ [[:File:Translation.gif]] is absolutely superb! [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 01:44, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
7520 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7519 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-12 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.247433480E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I am glad u like it.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. I am glad u like it. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 14:18, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

269664 +++$+++ Dmadeo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269664 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-17 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.237358160E09 +++$+++ I thought you'd appreciate this [[List of National Natural Landmarks in New Jersey]], only two more to go.  +++$+++ I thought you'd appreciate this [[List of National Natural Landmarks in New Jersey]], only two more to go. [[User:Dmadeo|dm]] ([[User talk:Dmadeo|talk]]) 23:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
269665 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269664 +++$+++ 269664 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.237358580E09 +++$+++ I do appreciate it. Thank you.  Very well done! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I do appreciate it. Thank you.  Very well done! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

569232 +++$+++ Msikma +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-24 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.164428220E09 +++$+++ Hello there. I see that you have deleted the [[Gaming World]] article after it turned up on AfD for the [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Gaming_World_%28second_nomination%29|second time]]. While I agree that the article itself was very poor and perhaps not the most important one of our encyclopedia, I do find it a bit strange that it was deleted for being non-notable. The submitter said that it isn't notable in its field (which is amateur [[Computer_role-playing_game|RPG]] creation); the site was rather large, however, with over 30,000 members and high-ranking Google results (for example, by far the most popular software for the creation of RPG games is [[RPG Maker series|RPG maker]]; while results for this software are mostly limited to product information, Gaming World is the first actual community site listed for a phrase such as \"[http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&lr=&q=rpg+maker+game&btnG=Search rpg maker game]\", which yields 1,730,000 results). The submitter also said that the site cannot easily be found when searching on Google for its name, [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=gaming%20world Gaming World], but this seems to be untrue; it instead shows up as the first result. Perhaps you could review this deletion sometime? I think that this website is sufficiently notable in its field to warrant inclusion. Thanks! \u2014 +++$+++ Hello there. I see that you have deleted the [[Gaming World]] article after it turned up on AfD for the [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gaming_World_%28second_nomination%29|second time]]. While I agree that the article itself was very poor and perhaps not the most important one of our encyclopedia, I do find it a bit strange that it was deleted for being non-notable. The submitter said that it isn't notable in its field (which is amateur [[Computer_role-playing_game|RPG]] creation); the site was rather large, however, with over 30,000 members and high-ranking Google results (for example, by far the most popular software for the creation of RPG games is [[RPG Maker series|RPG maker]]; while results for this software are mostly limited to product information, Gaming World is the first actual community site listed for a phrase such as "[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=rpg+maker+game&btnG=Search rpg maker game]", which yields 1,730,000 results). The submitter also said that the site cannot easily be found when searching on Google for its name, [http://www.google.com/search?q=gaming%20world Gaming World], but this seems to be untrue; it instead shows up as the first result. Perhaps you could review this deletion sometime? I think that this website is sufficiently notable in its field to warrant inclusion. Thanks! —[[User:Msikma|msikma]] &lt;[[User_talk:Msikma|user_talk:msikma]]&gt; 20:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
569233 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569232 +++$+++ 569232 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.164428580E09 +++$+++ Hello! If you want the deletion reviewed then you need to take your business case to [[:Wikipedia:Deletion review]] and state your reasons why the article should be reinstated.  +++$+++ :Hello! If you want the deletion reviewed then you need to take your business case to [[:Wikipedia:Deletion review]] and state your reasons why the article should be reinstated. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 20:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
569234 +++$+++ Msikma +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569232 +++$+++ 569233 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164429240E09 +++$+++ Okay, I will do that. I thought of putting it up there first, but the page stated that I should take it up with you first, as you were the closing admin. Nevertheless, I'll add it there. Thanks for the help. \u2014 +++$+++ ::Okay, I will do that. I thought of putting it up there first, but the page stated that I should take it up with you first, as you were the closing admin. Nevertheless, I'll add it there. Thanks for the help. —[[User:Msikma|msikma]] &lt;[[User_talk:Msikma|user_talk:msikma]]&gt; 20:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
569235 +++$+++ Msikma +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569232 +++$+++ 569233 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.164429600E09 +++$+++ I have listed the article on Deletion Review. You can find the discussion [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review\/Log\/2006_November_24|here]]. \u2014 +++$+++ ::I have listed the article on Deletion Review. You can find the discussion [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_November_24|here]]. —[[User:Msikma|msikma]] &lt;[[User_talk:Msikma|user_talk:msikma]]&gt; 20:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

7523 +++$+++  +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-31 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.251705180E09 +++$+++ What exactly did you mean by your edit summary?   +++$+++ What exactly did you mean by your edit summary?  [[User:Agradman|Andrew Gradman]]&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Agradman|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[WP:Hornbook]]</sub></small> 00:53, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
7524 +++$+++  +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7523 +++$+++ 7523 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.251705240E09 +++$+++ Oh, and thanks for supporting my proposal at [[WT:NPOV]]!!  +++$+++ :Oh, and thanks for supporting my proposal at [[WT:NPOV]]!! [[User:Agradman|Andrew Gradman]]&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Agradman|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[WP:Hornbook]]</sub></small> 00:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
7525 +++$+++  +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.251705480E09 +++$+++ PS You might be interested in joining us at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Policy and Guidelines]].  We're trying to make things less ... bureaucratic.  +++$+++ ::*PS You might be interested in joining us at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Policy and Guidelines]].  We're trying to make things less ... bureaucratic. [[User:Agradman|Andrew Gradman]]&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Agradman|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[WP:Hornbook]]</sub></small> 00:58, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
7526 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.251705780E09 +++$+++ Recruiting people to a project dedicated to making things less bureaucratic? Did you notice the irony in that? Anyways don't take this to my talk page. Use the discussion pages. That is what they are for.  +++$+++ :::Recruiting people to a project dedicated to making things less bureaucratic? Did you notice the irony in that? Anyways don't take this to my talk page. Use the discussion pages. That is what they are for. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 01:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
7527 +++$+++  +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.251717000E09 +++$+++ Jesus christ. 1) you didn't answer my question 2) you ignored the fact that I thanked you for something, and that I invited you to work with me at a wikiproject (I saw the links on your User page and thought we had interests in common)  3) you're being hostile.  You don't have to be nice to strangers, but I will ask you to show a little [[WP:Etiquette]].  My god.   +++$+++ ::::*Jesus christ. 1) you didn't answer my question 2) you ignored the fact that I thanked you for something, and that I invited you to work with me at a wikiproject (I saw the links on your User page and thought we had interests in common)  3) you're being hostile.  You don't have to be nice to strangers, but I will ask you to show a little [[WP:Etiquette]].  My god.  [[User:Agradman|Andrew Gradman]]&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Agradman|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[WP:Hornbook]]</sub></small> 04:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
7528 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.251720720E09 +++$+++ 1. The answer is on the appropriate discussion page, 2. You can't force people to join a wikiproject. 3. Calling me hostile for not saying \"your welcome\" when you thanked me makes me wonder if you deserve whatever you are thanking me for.  :).  +++$+++ ::::::1. The answer is on the appropriate discussion page, 2. You can't force people to join a wikiproject. 3. Calling me hostile for not saying "your welcome" when you thanked me makes me wonder if you deserve whatever you are thanking me for.  :). [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 05:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

531813 +++$+++ Glen Dillon +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531813 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-17 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.239962160E09 +++$+++ Hey. Not sure how to approach an issue concerning [[Petroleum in Western Australia]] which a user moved to Oil Industry of Western Australia yesterday. A significant change with only a brief edit note claiming \"standardization\".  I haven't raised my concerns with the user who made the change. I disagree with the change for a number of reasons, including, mainly, that: (1) Title is now inaccurate as oil is a specific product (part of the set of petroleum products) (2) Most of article is unrelated to oil. I tried to undo the change and was going to explain the basis for my revert on the talk page but the edit didn't happen.  I don't fully understand the technical aspects of Redirect vs Move etc. A redirect from Oil Industry... to Petroleum Industry would be appropriate but I'm firmly of the view that the original title should stand. Have you any thoughts on how I should approach this, including the approach I might take.  e.g. originally thought I'd just boldly undo the change and explain myself fully on the talk page, but is this something I need to raise directly with the person who did the move? Its no big deal to me, except that if it stays as is, I'd feel obliged, in the interests of accuracy, to substantially change the article - relocating about two thirds of the content to a new article on Gas Industry in WA etc etc. Would appreciate your brief thoughts.  +++$+++ Hey. Not sure how to approach an issue concerning [[Petroleum in Western Australia]] which a user moved to Oil Industry of Western Australia yesterday. A significant change with only a brief edit note claiming "standardization".  I haven't raised my concerns with the user who made the change. I disagree with the change for a number of reasons, including, mainly, that: (1) Title is now inaccurate as oil is a specific product (part of the set of petroleum products) (2) Most of article is unrelated to oil. I tried to undo the change and was going to explain the basis for my revert on the talk page but the edit didn't happen.  I don't fully understand the technical aspects of Redirect vs Move etc. A redirect from Oil Industry... to Petroleum Industry would be appropriate but I'm firmly of the view that the original title should stand. Have you any thoughts on how I should approach this, including the approach I might take.  e.g. originally thought I'd just boldly undo the change and explain myself fully on the talk page, but is this something I need to raise directly with the person who did the move? Its no big deal to me, except that if it stays as is, I'd feel obliged, in the interests of accuracy, to substantially change the article - relocating about two thirds of the content to a new article on Gas Industry in WA etc etc. Would appreciate your brief thoughts. [[user:Glen Dillon|GlenDillon]] 02:56, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
531814 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531813 +++$+++ 531813 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.239962340E09 +++$+++ Hmm I'd be interested too, standardisation issues plague categories to the point of absurdity  +++$+++ :Hmm I'd be interested too, standardisation issues plague categories to the point of absurdity [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 02:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
531815 +++$+++ Djanga +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531813 +++$+++ 531814 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.239969900E09 +++$+++ Its a bad move IMO.  It makes no sense in terms of the article content and was done without discussion or consensus.  As Satu alludes to, the action was likely motivated category standardisation issues.  It is a big deal to me when a high quality article gets stuffed around with in this manner. I'm reverting and will leave a note at Neelix's page suggesting further discussion be at the article talk.   +++$+++ ::Its a bad move IMO.  It makes no sense in terms of the article content and was done without discussion or consensus.  As Satu alludes to, the action was likely motivated category standardisation issues.  It is a big deal to me when a high quality article gets stuffed around with in this manner. I'm reverting and will leave a note at Neelix's page suggesting further discussion be at the article talk.  [[User talk:Djanga|Djanga]] 05:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
531816 +++$+++ Glen Dillon +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531813 +++$+++ 531815 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.239971280E09 +++$+++ brilliant. thank-you very much Djanga.  +++$+++ :::brilliant. thank-you very much Djanga. [[user:Glen Dillon|GlenDillon]] 05:28, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
531817 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531813 +++$+++ 531816 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 09:24:00 +++$+++ 1.239985440E09 +++$+++ I agree with you three. \"Standardisation\" for the sake of standardising, with no leeway for regional differences, seems pointless to me and the article is about petroleum, not the oil industry. Glen, feel free to go ahead and revert another user's changes; just explain why in the edit summary and\/or the talk page (I tend to revert with an explanation in the edit summary, and leave an explanation on the article or user's talk page if it seems appropriate). Moving pages creates redirects by default, and a page can't be moved over existing page (unless the existing page is just a single-edit redirect) except by administrators. When you try to move a page, you'll receive a message if you're unable to move it to the new location (then you could take it to [[WP:requested moves|requested moves]] or ask an admin to move it directly if it's not controversial). Oh, and thanks for being quicker than me, Djanga. :)  +++$+++ ::::I agree with you three. "Standardisation" for the sake of standardising, with no leeway for regional differences, seems pointless to me and the article is about petroleum, not the oil industry. Glen, feel free to go ahead and revert another user's changes; just explain why in the edit summary and/or the talk page (I tend to revert with an explanation in the edit summary, and leave an explanation on the article or user's talk page if it seems appropriate). Moving pages creates redirects by default, and a page can't be moved over existing page (unless the existing page is just a single-edit redirect) except by administrators. When you try to move a page, you'll receive a message if you're unable to move it to the new location (then you could take it to [[WP:requested moves|requested moves]] or ask an admin to move it directly if it's not controversial). Oh, and thanks for being quicker than me, Djanga. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 09:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

7531 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-07 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.252323240E09 +++$+++ How do you think NPOV came about?  +++$+++ How do you think NPOV came about? [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 04:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
7532 +++$+++ Sam +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7531 +++$+++ 7531 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.252324920E09 +++$+++ It is a founding policy.  Have you read [[Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines]]?  If you are proposing a new policy, than label it as a proposal and publicize it broadly.  I would say that your essay is already covered by existing policy and is an essay that does a very good job of explaining one aspect of that policy.  I am not saying that it is wrong, and I am not saying that it should or shouldn't be elevated to become a policy.  But if you want to elevate it to policy, you need to generate community support and show the need for a new policy.  Wikipedia pages are community process pages, proposals, policies, guidelines or essays.  If they are not tagged as one of these, they are likely to be deleted.  The work of a single editor is either a proposal or an essay.  It is your choice which you'd like it to be. -- [[User:Sam\/R|&#x2611; ]]<b> +++$+++ :It is a founding policy.  Have you read [[Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines]]?  If you are proposing a new policy, than label it as a proposal and publicize it broadly.  I would say that your essay is already covered by existing policy and is an essay that does a very good job of explaining one aspect of that policy.  I am not saying that it is wrong, and I am not saying that it should or shouldn't be elevated to become a policy.  But if you want to elevate it to policy, you need to generate community support and show the need for a new policy.  Wikipedia pages are community process pages, proposals, policies, guidelines or essays.  If they are not tagged as one of these, they are likely to be deleted.  The work of a single editor is either a proposal or an essay.  It is your choice which you'd like it to be. -- [[User:Sam/R|&#x2611; ]]<b>[[User:Sam|Sam]]</b><font color="#CCCCFF">[[User talk:Sam|uelWantman]]</font> 05:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

269676 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-19 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.237449720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your note. Glad to see you're still here. One thing I've learned about Wikipedia is that, despite its name, it requires patience. Cheers, &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ Thanks for your note. Glad to see you're still here. One thing I've learned about Wikipedia is that, despite its name, it requires patience. Cheers, &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 01:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
269677 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269676 +++$+++ 269676 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.237449960E09 +++$+++ You certainly have patience. I will take a page out of your play book! &mdash; +++$+++ :You certainly have patience. I will take a page out of your play book! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
269678 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269676 +++$+++ 269676 +++$+++ 2009-03-20 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.237538100E09 +++$+++ OK. I will give it a look over. &mdash; +++$+++ :OK. I will give it a look over. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

7533 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7533 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-07 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.252325520E09 +++$+++ I will do what I like with it, but right now it is what it is. If slapping tags on things makes you feel important, go ahead. Calling it an essay, (even though it isn't) will make it look less official, so people will feel that much less need to heed it.  +++$+++ I will do what I like with it, but right now it is what it is. If slapping tags on things makes you feel important, go ahead. Calling it an essay, (even though it isn't) will make it look less official, so people will feel that much less need to heed it. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 05:12, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
7534 +++$+++ Sam +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7533 +++$+++ 7533 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.252332960E09 +++$+++ If you think it should be official, perhaps you should try adding some of the clarifications you have made to [[WP:NPOV]], or alternatively, suggest that your page be made a subpage of that policy.  That policy's talk page would be the best forum to start the discussion. -- [[User:Sam\/R|&#x2611; ]]<b> +++$+++ :If you think it should be official, perhaps you should try adding some of the clarifications you have made to [[WP:NPOV]], or alternatively, suggest that your page be made a subpage of that policy.  That policy's talk page would be the best forum to start the discussion. -- [[User:Sam/R|&#x2611; ]]<b>[[User:Sam|Sam]]</b><font color="#CCCCFF">[[User talk:Sam|uelWantman]]</font> 07:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
7535 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7533 +++$+++ 7534 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.252368300E09 +++$+++ If you think it shouldn't be official, you should say so. And say why. Otherwise you are just promoting bureaucracy for the sake of bureaucracy.  +++$+++ ::If you think it shouldn't be official, you should say so. And say why. Otherwise you are just promoting bureaucracy for the sake of bureaucracy. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 17:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
7536 +++$+++ Sam +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7533 +++$+++ 7535 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.252374960E09 +++$+++ I think the point that you explain already IS official because it is part of [[WP:NPOV]], and I don't think there needs to be a policy page explaining the subtleties of every aspect of every guideline or rule.  If it is controversial, or not widely applied, you should start a discussion that attempts to reach community consensus.  You can't have it both ways.  If it is uncontroversial then a separate policy page is not needed.  If it is controversial, then you need to start discussions.  My concern is not with the sake of maintining bureaucracy, it is the opposite.  I do not want to add more policies if they are not needed. -- [[User:Sam\/R|&#x2611; ]]<b> +++$+++ :::I think the point that you explain already IS official because it is part of [[WP:NPOV]], and I don't think there needs to be a policy page explaining the subtleties of every aspect of every guideline or rule.  If it is controversial, or not widely applied, you should start a discussion that attempts to reach community consensus.  You can't have it both ways.  If it is uncontroversial then a separate policy page is not needed.  If it is controversial, then you need to start discussions.  My concern is not with the sake of maintining bureaucracy, it is the opposite.  I do not want to add more policies if they are not needed. -- [[User:Sam/R|&#x2611; ]]<b>[[User:Sam|Sam]]</b><font color="#CCCCFF">[[User talk:Sam|uelWantman]]</font> 18:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
7537 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7533 +++$+++ 7535 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.252377900E09 +++$+++ It is widely applied, and it is related to NPOV but it is not part of NPOV (what part were you thinking of?). If it is controversial, the controversy is with those who misuse NPOV (for whom every conflict results in adding opinions). The purpose of the page is to limit the precedence of opinions over facts that results from sloppy NPOV misuse. By ensuring the page looks unofficial you help prevent this from happening.  +++$+++ :::It is widely applied, and it is related to NPOV but it is not part of NPOV (what part were you thinking of?). If it is controversial, the controversy is with those who misuse NPOV (for whom every conflict results in adding opinions). The purpose of the page is to limit the precedence of opinions over facts that results from sloppy NPOV misuse. By ensuring the page looks unofficial you help prevent this from happening. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 19:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
7538 +++$+++ Sam +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7533 +++$+++ 7537 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.252391160E09 +++$+++ I am not the appropriate audience for your argument.  You don't have to convince me to agree with what you have written, I already agree.  But, if you want to call this a policy instead of an essay, then start the discussion on the talk page of NPOV and at the village pump and change the tag to {{tl|proposal}}.  I know of no policy that was the result of one person's work.  Start the discussion.  I'll support your effort. -- [[User:Sam\/R|&#x2611; ]]<b> +++$+++ ::::I am not the appropriate audience for your argument.  You don't have to convince me to agree with what you have written, I already agree.  But, if you want to call this a policy instead of an essay, then start the discussion on the talk page of NPOV and at the village pump and change the tag to {{tl|proposal}}.  I know of no policy that was the result of one person's work.  Start the discussion.  I'll support your effort. -- [[User:Sam/R|&#x2611; ]]<b>[[User:Sam|Sam]]</b><font color="#CCCCFF">[[User talk:Sam|uelWantman]]</font> 23:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
7539 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7533 +++$+++ 7538 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.252404840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the support. If you feel like following such a process go ahead. Right now what bothers me is the tag you added. I infer that you feel like some proper procedure would be violated if the tag was not in place. Since you want to play Wikilawyering perhaps you could direct me to this procedure.  +++$+++ :::::Thanks for the support. If you feel like following such a process go ahead. Right now what bothers me is the tag you added. I infer that you feel like some proper procedure would be violated if the tag was not in place. Since you want to play Wikilawyering perhaps you could direct me to this procedure. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 03:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
7540 +++$+++ Sam +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7533 +++$+++ 7539 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.252425720E09 +++$+++ Virtually all Wikipedia pages are tagged with something. I don't think I am alone in thinking that if a page is untagged then it is probably newly created, obscure, and\/or irrelevant.  So having a tag on it indicates that the author is aware of how policy and guidelines evolve.  To my eyes, and I think many others, having it tagged will make it look more legitimate, not less.  It also makes everything more transparent.  My first question when I say your page was \"what is this?\".  It was clear to me from looking at the history and the discussion page that it was an essay.  I tagged it as such to make it more transparent to the next reader.  The life cycle of a policy is discussed [[Wikipedia:PGLIFE#Life_cycle|here]]. -- [[User:Sam\/R|&#x2611; ]]<b> +++$+++ ::::::Virtually all Wikipedia pages are tagged with something. I don't think I am alone in thinking that if a page is untagged then it is probably newly created, obscure, and/or irrelevant.  So having a tag on it indicates that the author is aware of how policy and guidelines evolve.  To my eyes, and I think many others, having it tagged will make it look more legitimate, not less.  It also makes everything more transparent.  My first question when I say your page was "what is this?".  It was clear to me from looking at the history and the discussion page that it was an essay.  I tagged it as such to make it more transparent to the next reader.  The life cycle of a policy is discussed [[Wikipedia:PGLIFE#Life_cycle|here]]. -- [[User:Sam/R|&#x2611; ]]<b>[[User:Sam|Sam]]</b><font color="#CCCCFF">[[User talk:Sam|uelWantman]]</font> 09:02, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
7541 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7533 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.252453740E09 +++$+++ Maybe you should have read it instead, It usually helps if you are trying to find out what something is. Point me to the policy that says every page must be tagged.  +++$+++ ::::::::Maybe you should have read it instead, It usually helps if you are trying to find out what something is. Point me to the policy that says every page must be tagged. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 16:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
7542 +++$+++ Sam +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7533 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.253001960E09 +++$+++ I don't know if there is anything that explicitly says you must add a tag, but that is the customary practice.  Tagging puts the Wikipedia pages into categories and make their classification transparent to the user.  There is language that says that all Wikipedia-space pages are either community process pages, proposals, policies, guidelines or essays, and there are tags for all of these types.  I don't recall seeing any Wikipedia-space page that does not have a tag at the top, at least not for long. -- [[User:Sam\/R|&#x2611; ]]<b> +++$+++ :::::::::I don't know if there is anything that explicitly says you must add a tag, but that is the customary practice.  Tagging puts the Wikipedia pages into categories and make their classification transparent to the user.  There is language that says that all Wikipedia-space pages are either community process pages, proposals, policies, guidelines or essays, and there are tags for all of these types.  I don't recall seeing any Wikipedia-space page that does not have a tag at the top, at least not for long. -- [[User:Sam/R|&#x2611; ]]<b>[[User:Sam|Sam]]</b><font color="#CCCCFF">[[User talk:Sam|uelWantman]]</font> 01:06, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
7543 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7533 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.253012760E09 +++$+++ Try this logic on bigger fish first. Go tag the [[Wikipedia:Village pump|village pump]].  +++$+++ :::::::::::Try this logic on bigger fish first. Go tag the [[Wikipedia:Village pump|village pump]]. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 04:06, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

531822 +++$+++ Saebjorn +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-20 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.240217700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Saebjorn|Saebjorn]] ([[User talk:Saebjorn|talk]]) 01:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
531823 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531822 +++$+++ 531822 +++$+++ 2009-04-20 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.240248600E09 +++$+++ It does not look like \"[[When it Rains (song)|When it Rains]]\" meets this criteria, which is why I redirected the article to the artist's article. Hope that helps. :) Regards,  +++$+++ :It does not look like "[[When it Rains (song)|When it Rains]]" meets this criteria, which is why I redirected the article to the artist's article. Hope that helps. :) Regards, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 10:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
531824 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531822 +++$+++ 531822 +++$+++ 2009-04-28 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.240937940E09 +++$+++ Please read about [[WP:SPAM|spam on Wikipedia]]. Your repeated insertion of links to trxlink.com (e.g. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Vendor_portal&diff=286603805&oldid=270078984 here], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=E-procurement&diff=286603479&oldid=286397901 here]) are against Wikipedia policy and if you don't stop, you will be blocked for spamming. Regards,  +++$+++ :Please read about [[WP:SPAM|spam on Wikipedia]]. Your repeated insertion of links to trxlink.com (e.g. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vendor_portal&diff=286603805&oldid=270078984 here], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=E-procurement&diff=286603479&oldid=286397901 here]) are against Wikipedia policy and if you don't stop, you will be blocked for spamming. Regards, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 09:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

269679 +++$+++ Rosiestep +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-20 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.237537260E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Matisse, I award you this barnstar for reviewing so many ''DYK'' hook suggestions this week. After looking at the current [[T:TDYK]] page, I counted 168 edits have your name attached to them. Whether that's a record or not, your diligence is duly noted.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Matisse, I award you this barnstar for reviewing so many ''DYK'' hook suggestions this week. After looking at the current [[T:TDYK]] page, I counted 168 edits have your name attached to them. Whether that's a record or not, your diligence is duly noted. [[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 01:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
269680 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269679 +++$+++ 269679 +++$+++ 2009-03-20 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.237537740E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much! Thank you for noticing and for counting! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ *Thank you so much! Thank you for noticing and for counting! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

269681 +++$+++ Sarujo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-19 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.237517460E09 +++$+++ I'm glad to see your still in on this article. I seriously worried that I scared you off. Ont the article statis, if there are problems then we should fix them. I just don't want the article split again after I worked so hard to get as a single. Only to have certain users gloat and throw out \"I told you so\". So far I feel I've manged to build some nobility, but a little more couldn't hurt here and there. In responce to your statment, if you have questions about the character that could help you out, I'll be more than willing to tell you what I can in either mine or the article's talk page. As I also have a discussion on the article in my talk page. I look forward to any future involvement from you.  +++$+++ I'm glad to see your still in on this article. I seriously worried that I scared you off. Ont the article statis, if there are problems then we should fix them. I just don't want the article split again after I worked so hard to get as a single. Only to have certain users gloat and throw out "I told you so". So far I feel I've manged to build some nobility, but a little more couldn't hurt here and there. In responce to your statment, if you have questions about the character that could help you out, I'll be more than willing to tell you what I can in either mine or the article's talk page. As I also have a discussion on the article in my talk page. I look forward to any future involvement from you. [[User:Sarujo|Sarujo]] ([[User talk:Sarujo|talk]]) 19:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
269682 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269681 +++$+++ 269681 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.237626420E09 +++$+++ I will try to help you, but it is not a subject I know about. Glad to see you are still going strong also! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I will try to help you, but it is not a subject I know about. Glad to see you are still going strong also! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

269683 +++$+++ Enigmaticanant +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-20 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.237615080E09 +++$+++ sorry, i'm still coping to learn more about the different aspects of wikipedia. i edited [[Shadows of Time]] and created [[Prashant Narayanan]] and edited the two quite heavily on 15th\/16th of March and properly referenced for this \"interesting\" DYK (i think...). I dint know about this 5-day thing coz i took my own sweet time to edit the two articles. and also dint know about the 1500 word thing; wouldnt have nominated [[Florian Gallenberger]] then. so, can i nominate it for an earlier date?  if not, do i delete the whole thing from the DYK nomination page? regards, -- +++$+++ sorry, i'm still coping to learn more about the different aspects of wikipedia. i edited [[Shadows of Time]] and created [[Prashant Narayanan]] and edited the two quite heavily on 15th/16th of March and properly referenced for this "interesting" DYK (i think...). I dint know about this 5-day thing coz i took my own sweet time to edit the two articles. and also dint know about the 1500 word thing; wouldnt have nominated [[Florian Gallenberger]] then. so, can i nominate it for an earlier date?  if not, do i delete the whole thing from the DYK nomination page? regards, --[[User:Enigmaticanant|Anant Singh]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticanant|talk]]) 22:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
269684 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269683 +++$+++ 269683 +++$+++ 2009-03-20 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.237615740E09 +++$+++ Sorry! The five day rule is a little flexible but it does not extend to 15 days. Here are the '''[[Wikipedia:Did_you_know#DYK_rules|DYK rules]]'''. Some editors keep a new article in their [[WP:user space|user space]] until it is ready for DYK, as if the article is in you user space it does not count toward the 5 days for a new article. Also, you can expand an old article 5-fold and that will count if done within approximately 5 days. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ : Sorry! The five day rule is a little flexible but it does not extend to 15 days. Here are the '''[[Wikipedia:Did_you_know#DYK_rules|DYK rules]]'''. Some editors keep a new article in their [[WP:user space|user space]] until it is ready for DYK, as if the article is in you user space it does not count toward the 5 days for a new article. Also, you can expand an old article 5-fold and that will count if done within approximately 5 days. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
269685 +++$+++ Enigmaticanant +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269683 +++$+++ 269684 +++$+++ 2009-03-20 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.237616940E09 +++$+++ \"''The five day rule is a little flexible but it does not extend to 15 days.''\"<br \/>its just the sixth day today since i expanded those articles?? 15th and 16th march! cant it be flexible for a day or two?? -- +++$+++ :: "''The five day rule is a little flexible but it does not extend to 15 days.''"<br />its just the sixth day today since i expanded those articles?? 15th and 16th march! cant it be flexible for a day or two?? --[[User:Enigmaticanant|Anant Singh]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticanant|talk]]) 23:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
269686 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269683 +++$+++ 269685 +++$+++ 2009-03-20 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.237617540E09 +++$+++ But did you expand them five-fold, that is, in character bits of prose (not including markup, references, infobox, lists, quotations etc.) you must have made the article five times as big as it was when you started, as measured by [[User:Dr pda\/prosesize.js]]? Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::: But did you expand them five-fold, that is, in character bits of prose (not including markup, references, infobox, lists, quotations etc.) you must have made the article five times as big as it was when you started, as measured by [[User:Dr pda/prosesize.js]]? Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
269687 +++$+++ Enigmaticanant +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269683 +++$+++ 269686 +++$+++ 2009-03-20 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.237618080E09 +++$+++ Alright...will delete the entry. its jus that all this was a little demotivating...anyways will keep in mind all these \"rules\" the next time. thanks for the extra info...regards -- +++$+++ :::: Alright...will delete the entry. its jus that all this was a little demotivating...anyways will keep in mind all these "rules" the next time. thanks for the extra info...regards --[[User:Enigmaticanant|Anant Singh]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticanant|talk]]) 23:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
269688 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269683 +++$+++ 269687 +++$+++ 2009-03-20 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.237618440E09 +++$+++ You can just leave it there if you want, as it harms nothing. I know it can be discouraging, especially when you nominate a good DKY and it gets ignored anyway! Current the DYK people seem to be doing a good job, but the rules take some getting used to. Remember how much I monitored ''[[The Cloud Gate]]''? It can be a bit of an ordeal, but it is nice to get those DYK banners! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::: You can just leave it there if you want, as it harms nothing. I know it can be discouraging, especially when you nominate a good DKY and it gets ignored anyway! Current the DYK people seem to be doing a good job, but the rules take some getting used to. Remember how much I monitored ''[[The Cloud Gate]]''? It can be a bit of an ordeal, but it is nice to get those DYK banners! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

531830 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531830 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-29 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.241027760E09 +++$+++ Yeah well i suppose it when it gets to the problem level it might need a protect :( - for some weird reason - most of perth private schools seem relatively unharmed of recent  +++$+++ Yeah well i suppose it when it gets to the problem level it might need a protect :( - for some weird reason - most of perth private schools seem relatively unharmed of recent [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 10:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
531831 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531830 +++$+++ 531830 +++$+++ 2009-04-30 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.241088300E09 +++$+++ I predict there'll be all sorts of trouble in the Perth articles now you've said that and jinxed it. :)  +++$+++ :I predict there'll be all sorts of trouble in the Perth articles now you've said that and jinxed it. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:45, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

269689 +++$+++ CarpetCrawler +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-21 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.237638660E09 +++$+++ I'm not exactly an expert at this stuff... so now whoever the person is that picks what DYK's get selected, will pick between my DYK choice for this article, and your alternate choice? This is my first time nominating something in the DYK, so I'm still a n00b at this stuff. :) Your alternate take on the DYK for the article is pretty good! Have a nice day!  +++$+++ I'm not exactly an expert at this stuff... so now whoever the person is that picks what DYK's get selected, will pick between my DYK choice for this article, and your alternate choice? This is my first time nominating something in the DYK, so I'm still a n00b at this stuff. :) Your alternate take on the DYK for the article is pretty good! Have a nice day! [[User:CarpetCrawler|CarpetCrawler]] ([[User talk:CarpetCrawler|talk]]) 05:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
269690 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269689 +++$+++ 269689 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.237663260E09 +++$+++ I have not, so far, helped with the picking of the hooks and moving them to the queues. I am trying to learn the process. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I have not, so far, helped with the picking of the hooks and moving them to the queues. I am trying to learn the process. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
269691 +++$+++ CarpetCrawler +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269689 +++$+++ 269690 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.237692780E09 +++$+++ OK, thank you for the clarification! :)  +++$+++ ::OK, thank you for the clarification! :) [[User:CarpetCrawler|CarpetCrawler]] ([[User talk:CarpetCrawler|talk]]) 20:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

7548 +++$+++ Brambleclawx +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7548 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-29 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.262074920E09 +++$+++ Hello. You have listed yourself as a member of WikiProject Cats. I would appreciate your help in creating [[User:Brambleclawx\/Canadian Cat Association|Canadian Cat Association]], which is a request on the to-do list. Thank you, ''<span style=\"background:#00BB00\"> +++$+++ Hello. You have listed yourself as a member of WikiProject Cats. I would appreciate your help in creating [[User:Brambleclawx/Canadian Cat Association|Canadian Cat Association]], which is a request on the to-do list. Thank you, ''<span style="background:#00BB00">[[User:Brambleclawx|<span style="color:brown">Bramble</span>]][[User talk:Brambleclawx|<span style="color:brown">claw</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Brambleclawx|<span style="color:brown">x</span>]]</span>'' 00:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
7549 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7548 +++$+++ 7548 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.262078760E09 +++$+++ Actually, I think I started that project.  +++$+++ :Actually, I think I started that project. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 01:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
7550 +++$+++ Brambleclawx +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7548 +++$+++ 7549 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.262083860E09 +++$+++ Whatever. I think its actually [[User:GeorgeMoney]] who started it (he made the wikiproject page), but thats besides the point. Will you help? ''<span style=\"background:#00BB00\"> +++$+++ ::Whatever. I think its actually [[User:GeorgeMoney]] who started it (he made the wikiproject page), but thats besides the point. Will you help? ''<span style="background:#00BB00">[[User:Brambleclawx|<span style="color:brown">Bramble</span>]][[User talk:Brambleclawx|<span style="color:brown">claw</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Brambleclawx|<span style="color:brown">x</span>]]</span>'' 02:51, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
7551 +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7548 +++$+++ 7550 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.262155980E09 +++$+++ You think wrong. It was originally Wikipedia:WikiProject Cat breeds. It got renamed\/moved.  +++$+++ :::You think wrong. It was originally Wikipedia:WikiProject Cat breeds. It got renamed/moved. [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] ([[User talk:Bensaccount#top|talk]]) 22:53, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
7552 +++$+++ Brambleclawx +++$+++ Bensaccount +++$+++ 7548 +++$+++ 7551 +++$+++ 2009-12-30 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.262238480E09 +++$+++ Well, alrighty. I don't have ''that'' much time to do research on the histories of Wikiprojects. ''<span style=\"background:#00BB00\"> +++$+++ ::::Well, alrighty. I don't have ''that'' much time to do research on the histories of Wikiprojects. ''<span style="background:#00BB00">[[User:Brambleclawx|<span style="color:brown">Bramble</span>]][[User talk:Brambleclawx|<span style="color:brown">claw</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Brambleclawx|<span style="color:brown">x</span>]]</span>'' 21:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

176021 +++$+++ Jbarta +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ 176021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-06 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.307426460E09 +++$+++ How did you remove the watermark?  +++$+++ How did you remove the watermark? [[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta|talk]]) 23:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
176022 +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ 176021 +++$+++ 176021 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.307431200E09 +++$+++ I scanned the archive page for images with minimal content and extracted a rough watermark using their thumbnails (the watermark was additive). I did that with multiple images and also combined the watermark with a mirrored copy to get rid of any random junk and average away the noise. Then, after using the watermark on the requested images, I used FFT filtering to remove remaining thin horizontal and vertical lines (JPEG artifacts). Of course, some cloning and blurring was also necessary. The watermark at the top was removed by simply cloning or cropping. \u2014 +++$+++ :I scanned the archive page for images with minimal content and extracted a rough watermark using their thumbnails (the watermark was additive). I did that with multiple images and also combined the watermark with a mirrored copy to get rid of any random junk and average away the noise. Then, after using the watermark on the requested images, I used FFT filtering to remove remaining thin horizontal and vertical lines (JPEG artifacts). Of course, some cloning and blurring was also necessary. The watermark at the top was removed by simply cloning or cropping. —[[User:Quibik|Quibik]] ([[User talk:Quibik#top|talk]]) 00:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
176023 +++$+++ Jbarta +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ 176021 +++$+++ 176022 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.307433300E09 +++$+++ ''\"using the watermark on the requested images\"''... could you explain this a little further? Or possibly point me in a useful direction?  +++$+++ ::''"using the watermark on the requested images"''... could you explain this a little further? Or possibly point me in a useful direction? [[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta|talk]]) 00:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
176024 +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ 176021 +++$+++ 176023 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.307435580E09 +++$+++ I meant: paste the watermark image that was extracted, set the layer mode to \"grain merge\" or \"grain extract\" (I don't how it's called in Photoshop), and possibly do some aligning. Then merge. That's all. Just a note: some watermarks are created using \"multiply\" (which can thus be extracted by dividing) or even a combination of \"grain merge\" and \"multiply\" modes. If you'd like, I could e-mail you the watermark image I extracted? I guess that would make this a bit more clear for you. \u2014 +++$+++ :::I meant: paste the watermark image that was extracted, set the layer mode to "grain merge" or "grain extract" (I don't how it's called in Photoshop), and possibly do some aligning. Then merge. That's all. Just a note: some watermarks are created using "multiply" (which can thus be extracted by dividing) or even a combination of "grain merge" and "multiply" modes. If you'd like, I could e-mail you the watermark image I extracted? I guess that would make this a bit more clear for you. —[[User:Quibik|Quibik]] ([[User talk:Quibik#top|talk]]) 01:33, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
176025 +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ 176021 +++$+++ 176024 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 08:02:00 +++$+++ 1.307458920E09 +++$+++ That was some seriously cool watermark removal, I agree. [http:\/\/emptyeasel.com\/2008\/11\/07\/how-blending-modes-work-part-two-dodge-burn-soft-light-and-hard-light\/ An old blog thing] I found says GIMP's grain extract\/merge blending modes are not available in PS, but hints that it's a less extreme version of Hard light. \u2013&nbsp;<font color=\"#06266f\">Ker\u03b1u<\/font><font color=\"#1240AB\">no\u03c2co<\/font><font color=\"#4671DS\">pia<\/font><font color=\"#A60000\"><sup>\u25c1<\/sup><\/font><i><sub><font color=\"#5E1FFF\"> +++$+++ ::::That was some seriously cool watermark removal, I agree. [http://emptyeasel.com/2008/11/07/how-blending-modes-work-part-two-dodge-burn-soft-light-and-hard-light/ An old blog thing] I found says GIMP's grain extract/merge blending modes are not available in PS, but hints that it's a less extreme version of Hard light. –&nbsp;<font color="#06266f">Kerαu</font><font color="#1240AB">noςco</font><font color="#4671DS">pia</font><font color="#A60000"><sup>◁</sup></font><i><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User:Keraunoscopia|gala]][[User talk:Keraunoscopia|xies]]</font></sub></i> 08:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
176026 +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ 176021 +++$+++ 176025 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 09:39:00 +++$+++ 1.307464740E09 +++$+++ Wow. I'm really quite surprised to see that photoshop does not have a direct equivalent of \"grain merge\" or \"grain extract\". Their mathematical definition is (calling our 2 layers ''top'' and ''bottom''): ''bottom''+(''top''\u2212128) for \"grain merge\" and ''bottom''\u2212(''top''\u2212128) for \"grain extract\". That is, you are basically doing addition and subtraction with the two layers, but the top layer's zero point is set to 128. This means you can represent both negative and positive values inside a layer. I guess I should mention then that by ''extracting'' (in my first response) I meant \"grain extract\". By looking at the [http:\/\/dunnbypaul.net\/blends\/ mathematical definitions] and the [http:\/\/help.adobe.com\/en_US\/photoshop\/cs\/using\/WSfd1234e1c4b69f30ea53e41001031ab64-77e9a.html official manual] of Photoshop's layer modes, the closest ones are perhaps \"Linear Dodge\" and \"Subtract\". At least CS5 seems to have added \"divide\" mode which is necessary for working with watermarks that were added by using \"multiply\" (a very common case). \u2014 +++$+++ :::::Wow. I'm really quite surprised to see that photoshop does not have a direct equivalent of "grain merge" or "grain extract". Their mathematical definition is (calling our 2 layers ''top'' and ''bottom''): ''bottom''+(''top''−128) for "grain merge" and ''bottom''−(''top''−128) for "grain extract". That is, you are basically doing addition and subtraction with the two layers, but the top layer's zero point is set to 128. This means you can represent both negative and positive values inside a layer. I guess I should mention then that by ''extracting'' (in my first response) I meant "grain extract". By looking at the [http://dunnbypaul.net/blends/ mathematical definitions] and the [http://help.adobe.com/en_US/photoshop/cs/using/WSfd1234e1c4b69f30ea53e41001031ab64-77e9a.html official manual] of Photoshop's layer modes, the closest ones are perhaps "Linear Dodge" and "Subtract". At least CS5 seems to have added "divide" mode which is necessary for working with watermarks that were added by using "multiply" (a very common case). —[[User:Quibik|Quibik]] ([[User talk:Quibik#top|talk]]) 09:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

531840 +++$+++ Kasaalan +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531840 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-04 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.241485140E09 +++$+++ Without wikifying the quotes, what is your main reason to delete the article, article is notable based on good references. It had blockquotes with clear references, waiting for wikifying. You deleted the article as a whole, removing all info from it, without discussing or warning, or expressing your concerns. At least you could give me time to take a copy of the article before deleting it. What was your exact hurry.  +++$+++ Without wikifying the quotes, what is your main reason to delete the article, article is notable based on good references. It had blockquotes with clear references, waiting for wikifying. You deleted the article as a whole, removing all info from it, without discussing or warning, or expressing your concerns. At least you could give me time to take a copy of the article before deleting it. What was your exact hurry. [[User:Kasaalan|Kasaalan]] ([[User talk:Kasaalan|talk]]) 17:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
531841 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531840 +++$+++ 531840 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.241511900E09 +++$+++ Hi Kasaalan, sorry I didn't get a chance to drop a note on your talk page about this article when I deleted it. The article was deleted per [[WP:CSD#G12|CSD criterion G12]] as an unambiguous copyright violation (99% of the article was copied from other sources). There are a few ways of dealing with copyright infringement - reverting the article back to a non-infringing version, which was not possible with this article as there was no non-infringing version, rewriting the article (which was the option I chose with [[Phil Goldvarg]] in February, when I explained copyright infringement to you but you continued to edit war over it) or deleting the article. The best way to deal with [[Philip Munger]], when the entire article was a copyright violation, was speedy deletion. This does not exclude the article from being recreated with non-copyvio text.  +++$+++ :Hi Kasaalan, sorry I didn't get a chance to drop a note on your talk page about this article when I deleted it. The article was deleted per [[WP:CSD#G12|CSD criterion G12]] as an unambiguous copyright violation (99% of the article was copied from other sources). There are a few ways of dealing with copyright infringement - reverting the article back to a non-infringing version, which was not possible with this article as there was no non-infringing version, rewriting the article (which was the option I chose with [[Phil Goldvarg]] in February, when I explained copyright infringement to you but you continued to edit war over it) or deleting the article. The best way to deal with [[Philip Munger]], when the entire article was a copyright violation, was speedy deletion. This does not exclude the article from being recreated with non-copyvio text. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 01:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
531842 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531840 +++$+++ 531841 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.241514060E09 +++$+++ In response to your message [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Category_talk:Wikipedia_administrators_who_will_provide_copies_of_deleted_articles&diff=prev&oldid=287886393 here], the sorting issue is caused by users who haven't added a defaultsort template to their user page, so it is up to them to fix. If you are looking for someone to provide a copy of Philip Munger, no admin will restore a copyright violation (which would have been my answer if you'd asked me as the deleting admin to restore it). I can give you the links in the article though if you like, which will enable you to access the content that was in the article anyway?  +++$+++ ::In response to your message [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Wikipedia_administrators_who_will_provide_copies_of_deleted_articles&diff=prev&oldid=287886393 here], the sorting issue is caused by users who haven't added a defaultsort template to their user page, so it is up to them to fix. If you are looking for someone to provide a copy of Philip Munger, no admin will restore a copyright violation (which would have been my answer if you'd asked me as the deleting admin to restore it). I can give you the links in the article though if you like, which will enable you to access the content that was in the article anyway? [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
531843 +++$+++ Kasaalan +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531840 +++$+++ 531842 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.241580180E09 +++$+++ You claim copyright violation, yet it had selected parts from his biography as a lead, and some clearly referenced blockquotes from various sources waiting to be wikified in musical career and on his discussion with [[Sarah Palin]] over dinosaurs, along with various reliable external links and references. Yet again without trying to improve and wikify an article, discuss it, warn it, or asked for improvement you tried to delete it. Except the generally required wikifying the article was in good shape, because all the research needed has been done by my work. At least I found a copy of the article. You simply lack the collaborative and positive approach to build an article, the rules are for improvements of the articles not deletion of them.  +++$+++ :::You claim copyright violation, yet it had selected parts from his biography as a lead, and some clearly referenced blockquotes from various sources waiting to be wikified in musical career and on his discussion with [[Sarah Palin]] over dinosaurs, along with various reliable external links and references. Yet again without trying to improve and wikify an article, discuss it, warn it, or asked for improvement you tried to delete it. Except the generally required wikifying the article was in good shape, because all the research needed has been done by my work. At least I found a copy of the article. You simply lack the collaborative and positive approach to build an article, the rules are for improvements of the articles not deletion of them. [[User:Kasaalan|Kasaalan]] ([[User talk:Kasaalan|talk]]) 20:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
531844 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531840 +++$+++ 531843 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.241610720E09 +++$+++ Hi Kasaalan. 99% of the article was a copyright violation. Wikipedia can't have an entire article filled with stuff copied in from other websites, even if it's formatted in block quotes. The article was not in good shape - copyright violations are illegal and not welcome on Wikipedia. I don't know why you say \"yet again without trying to improve and wikify an article\", because all I do on Wikipedia is improve articles. If you remember, in February, I chose that option with Phil Goldvarg, which was also a copyright violation, and you edit warred over it until I gave up and the copyvio version remained. I'm not sure if you are intentionally being [[WP:Tendentious editing|tendentious]] to wear other editors down, but I had hoped you would show acceptance of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines by now - otherwise I cannot assist you.  +++$+++ ::::Hi Kasaalan. 99% of the article was a copyright violation. Wikipedia can't have an entire article filled with stuff copied in from other websites, even if it's formatted in block quotes. The article was not in good shape - copyright violations are illegal and not welcome on Wikipedia. I don't know why you say "yet again without trying to improve and wikify an article", because all I do on Wikipedia is improve articles. If you remember, in February, I chose that option with Phil Goldvarg, which was also a copyright violation, and you edit warred over it until I gave up and the copyvio version remained. I'm not sure if you are intentionally being [[WP:Tendentious editing|tendentious]] to wear other editors down, but I had hoped you would show acceptance of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines by now - otherwise I cannot assist you. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 04:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
531845 +++$+++ Kasaalan +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531840 +++$+++ 531844 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 09:17:00 +++$+++ 1.241626620E09 +++$+++ You could easily tag the article for improving. I took 3 different copyright classes in university and published a number of academic papers, a case where you clearly adress the source is not same as you put text as your own. '''I specifically put the text as blockquote for other editors can be easily aware they are blockquotes needs to be wikified.''' '''You have a point the article had 4, 1 paragraph long blockquotes from 4 reliable sources, yet they were clearly referenced, and deleting the article completely is not a constructive approach.''' And they could converted into proper format by especially more experienced editors.'' You are right they need to be wikified, but instead putting any effort on wikifying them, ask for help from other editors or discuss with me, you deleted it yourself completely, without return.'' That is not a constructive approach, you know it, but you have a delete this, delete that approach in applying guidelines. When I asked your opinion on my notability proofs for another case you claimed ''\"I am very busy at the moment with off-wiki stuff\"'' to give opinion, yet you have time for all the pages that \"needs to be deleted\".  +++$+++ :::::You could easily tag the article for improving. I took 3 different copyright classes in university and published a number of academic papers, a case where you clearly adress the source is not same as you put text as your own. '''I specifically put the text as blockquote for other editors can be easily aware they are blockquotes needs to be wikified.''' '''You have a point the article had 4, 1 paragraph long blockquotes from 4 reliable sources, yet they were clearly referenced, and deleting the article completely is not a constructive approach.''' And they could converted into proper format by especially more experienced editors.'' You are right they need to be wikified, but instead putting any effort on wikifying them, ask for help from other editors or discuss with me, you deleted it yourself completely, without return.'' That is not a constructive approach, you know it, but you have a delete this, delete that approach in applying guidelines. When I asked your opinion on my notability proofs for another case you claimed ''"I am very busy at the moment with off-wiki stuff"'' to give opinion, yet you have time for all the pages that "needs to be deleted". [[User:Kasaalan|Kasaalan]] ([[User talk:Kasaalan|talk]]) 09:17, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

612928 +++$+++ Persianhistory2008 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-20 09:17:00 +++$+++ 1.195579020E09 +++$+++ Hello Dave, I got your message, but not sure what it is you want me to do? Which other page is it on? thank you.-- +++$+++ Hello Dave, I got your message, but not sure what it is you want me to do? Which other page is it on? thank you.--[[User:Persianhistory2008|Persianhistory2008]] ([[User talk:Persianhistory2008|talk]]) 09:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
612929 +++$+++ Persianhistory2008 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612928 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.195614780E09 +++$+++ '''Also, I need some help!''' I have to change the \"E\" into a lower case in [[Ahl-E Haqq]], but it says there is already a page there and will not go through. Can you please make it lower case or tell me how?-- +++$+++ ::'''Also, I need some help!''' I have to change the "E" into a lower case in [[Ahl-E Haqq]], but it says there is already a page there and will not go through. Can you please make it lower case or tell me how?--[[User:Persianhistory2008|Persianhistory2008]] ([[User talk:Persianhistory2008|talk]]) 19:13, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
612930 +++$+++ Gyrofrog +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612928 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.195623960E09 +++$+++ Dave, I've weighed in at [[Talk:Ahl-E Haqq#Page move]]. Unless I've missed something, it might not be as bad as expected. --  +++$+++ :::Dave, I've weighed in at [[Talk:Ahl-E Haqq#Page move]]. Unless I've missed something, it might not be as bad as expected. -- [[User:Gyrofrog|Gyrofrog ]] [[User_talk:Gyrofrog|(talk)]] 21:46, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
612931 +++$+++ Persianhistory2008 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612928 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.196093400E09 +++$+++ Dave, okay, wow, so I just spent a few hours trying to correct the \"On\" on all the pages you asked me to. I did it on a few, but 95% of all the pages that linked into \"On the Origin of Species\" already use \"On\", so I did not even have to add anything, but I checked most of them anyway.-- +++$+++ ::::Dave, okay, wow, so I just spent a few hours trying to correct the "On" on all the pages you asked me to. I did it on a few, but 95% of all the pages that linked into "On the Origin of Species" already use "On", so I did not even have to add anything, but I checked most of them anyway.--[[User:Persianhistory2008|Persianhistory2008]] ([[User talk:Persianhistory2008|talk]]) 08:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
612932 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612928 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.196126040E09 +++$+++ Thanks, there still seem to be plenty still to tidy up. More than half of the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere\/On_the_Origin_of_Species&limit=500&from=0 Pages that link to On the Origin of Species] link through the redirect, and can be seen directly under [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere\/The_Origin_of_Species&limit=250&from=0 Pages that link to The Origin of Species]. No doubt we'll get them all sorted out in the fullness of time. ...  +++$+++ ::::::Thanks, there still seem to be plenty still to tidy up. More than half of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere/On_the_Origin_of_Species&limit=500&from=0 Pages that link to On the Origin of Species] link through the redirect, and can be seen directly under [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere/The_Origin_of_Species&limit=250&from=0 Pages that link to The Origin of Species]. No doubt we'll get them all sorted out in the fullness of time. ... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
612933 +++$+++ Persianhistory2008 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612928 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-27 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.196177040E09 +++$+++ There is a big problem on the page. \"Francis Schonken\" keeps moving the page back, and now is bulling me with threats. I have provided citations and proof for the name.-- +++$+++ ::::::::There is a big problem on the page. "Francis Schonken" keeps moving the page back, and now is bulling me with threats. I have provided citations and proof for the name.--[[User:Persianhistory2008|Persianhistory2008]] ([[User talk:Persianhistory2008|talk]]) 07:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

269698 +++$+++ The Little Blue Frog +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269698 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-21 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.237691160E09 +++$+++ Sorry to bother you again: on the DYK suggestion page (for ''Annual Bulletin'' and ''ABA Journal'') I still don't understand why you wrote off my sources as unverified books or offline that'd need to be AGF: they're all directly online. Another editor commented \"It means that Mattisse didn't check the source itself but is trusting that the information is in there\", all right, but then wouldn't it be more clear for us to say \"Online sources not checked on good faith\" in this case? <span style=\"color:#00F\">&mdash;<\/span>&nbsp; +++$+++ Sorry to bother you again: on the DYK suggestion page (for ''Annual Bulletin'' and ''ABA Journal'') I still don't understand why you wrote off my sources as unverified books or offline that'd need to be AGF: they're all directly online. Another editor commented "It means that Mattisse didn't check the source itself but is trusting that the information is in there", all right, but then wouldn't it be more clear for us to say "Online sources not checked on good faith" in this case? <span style="color:#00F">&mdash;</span>&nbsp;[[User:The Little Blue Frog|The Little Blue Frog]]&nbsp;([[User talk:The Little Blue Frog|<span style="font-weight:lighter">ribbit</span>]]) 20:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
269699 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269698 +++$+++ 269698 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.237691700E09 +++$+++ I would have to go look at the situation again to remember what happened in the case of your articles. Sometimes the problem is I cannot access the online version (subscription\/membership situation); there have been cases recently where \"error in digital signature\" has prevented my browser from opening pages; sometimes verification requires reading many long tables or articles and essentially piecing the information together. If I can't find the info but the editor has credibility then sometimes I will accept the online info in good faith. I don't want to say I found the information if I did not.  Hope that explanation helps.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I would have to go look at the situation again to remember what happened in the case of your articles. Sometimes the problem is I cannot access the online version (subscription/membership situation); there have been cases recently where "error in digital signature" has prevented my browser from opening pages; sometimes verification requires reading many long tables or articles and essentially piecing the information together. If I can't find the info but the editor has credibility then sometimes I will accept the online info in good faith. I don't want to say I found the information if I did not.  Hope that explanation helps.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
269700 +++$+++ The Little Blue Frog +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269698 +++$+++ 269699 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.237694580E09 +++$+++ (Last followup, I promise ;-) In the case of my hook, a Find on \"first comparative\" in the cited online source located the reference \u2013 but I realize you can't always read\/check everything and you don't want to report otherwise. However my suggestion was about the wording of the report on the DYK page: I think that reporting \"Book not checked\" or \"Offline source not checked\" should be used only for paper sources, or it'll give the nominator a feeling that something is wrong when he knowns his hook was sourced online. If it's an online source that you couldn't parse or access, I think the report should mention \"Online source\", as in \"Online source not checked, assumed on good faith\" or \"Online source not checked (membership)\" or \"Online source not checked (site down)\" or such. I would be more clear for everyone (also, \"Online source not checked\" means that other admins can try it if they feel like, whereas \"Book not checked\" basically means \"forget it, impossible to verify without going to a library\"). Regards, <span style=\"color:#00F\">&mdash;<\/span>&nbsp; +++$+++ ::(Last followup, I promise ;-) In the case of my hook, a Find on "first comparative" in the cited online source located the reference – but I realize you can't always read/check everything and you don't want to report otherwise. However my suggestion was about the wording of the report on the DYK page: I think that reporting "Book not checked" or "Offline source not checked" should be used only for paper sources, or it'll give the nominator a feeling that something is wrong when he knowns his hook was sourced online. If it's an online source that you couldn't parse or access, I think the report should mention "Online source", as in "Online source not checked, assumed on good faith" or "Online source not checked (membership)" or "Online source not checked (site down)" or such. I would be more clear for everyone (also, "Online source not checked" means that other admins can try it if they feel like, whereas "Book not checked" basically means "forget it, impossible to verify without going to a library"). Regards, <span style="color:#00F">&mdash;</span>&nbsp;[[User:The Little Blue Frog|The Little Blue Frog]]&nbsp;([[User talk:The Little Blue Frog|<span style="font-weight:lighter">ribbit</span>]]) 21:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
269701 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269698 +++$+++ 269700 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.237696260E09 +++$+++ Maybe the above  will clarify. If you feel that what you are suggesting should be a \"rule\", you should take it up on [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]] where that kind of thing is decided. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Maybe the above  will clarify. If you feel that what you are suggesting should be a "rule", you should take it up on [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]] where that kind of thing is decided. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
269702 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269698 +++$+++ 269698 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.237703520E09 +++$+++ Jumping in uninvited.... I have always used \"X source accepted in good faith\" as a blanket statement for any time I don't check a source, for whatever reason.  Sometimes it's for like biology articles and stuff where I wouldn't understand it anyway, so I say something like \"technical source accepted....\".  Other times it's for a source that I couldn't access, either because it's not online or it's behind a paywall.  This is the first time I've heard of a nominator worrying that something was wrong....but in general, any time we say your source was accepted, it should mean that nothing is wrong. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ :Jumping in uninvited.... I have always used "X source accepted in good faith" as a blanket statement for any time I don't check a source, for whatever reason.  Sometimes it's for like biology articles and stuff where I wouldn't understand it anyway, so I say something like "technical source accepted....".  Other times it's for a source that I couldn't access, either because it's not online or it's behind a paywall.  This is the first time I've heard of a nominator worrying that something was wrong....but in general, any time we say your source was accepted, it should mean that nothing is wrong. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 23:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

269703 +++$+++ Wpwatchdog +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269703 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-22 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.237750980E09 +++$+++ The external link is removed from the Shipwreck section.  An article by the Great Lakes Exploration Group is used as a reference in the Construction section.  Should this be removed?  -- +++$+++ The external link is removed from the Shipwreck section.  An article by the Great Lakes Exploration Group is used as a reference in the Construction section.  Should this be removed?  --[[User:Wpwatchdog|Wpwatchdog]] ([[User talk:Wpwatchdog|talk]]) 12:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
269704 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269703 +++$+++ 269703 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.237752180E09 +++$+++ Using it as a reference is fine for appropriate information. Glancing at the article, it looks good with no exterior links in the article body. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Using it as a reference is fine for appropriate information. Glancing at the article, it looks good with no exterior links in the article body. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

269706 +++$+++ Deacon of Pndapetzim +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-23 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.237803720E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ADid_you_know&diff=279030104&oldid=279029645 this], you appear to have misunderstood. The ODNB link was given as an extra reference to help User:Law if he could use it, or for anyone passing who could, as this reference is online. What purpose did you think it had? I can't really make sense of the \"what percentage of readers\" comment. Thanks.  +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ADid_you_know&diff=279030104&oldid=279029645 this], you appear to have misunderstood. The ODNB link was given as an extra reference to help User:Law if he could use it, or for anyone passing who could, as this reference is online. What purpose did you think it had? I can't really make sense of the "what percentage of readers" comment. Thanks. [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 03:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269707 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269706 +++$+++ 269706 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.237842420E09 +++$+++ Sorry. I mistakenly thought you were offering the link to hook  specifically to [[User:Law]].  I was wondering what percentage of readers the new link would help, as [[User:Law]] specifically is not the issue, but rather the general accessibility of a reference to all readers. I was double checking the hook review, and the new link did not help me. I am sorry if I offended you. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Sorry. I mistakenly thought you were offering the link to hook  specifically to [[User:Law]].  I was wondering what percentage of readers the new link would help, as [[User:Law]] specifically is not the issue, but rather the general accessibility of a reference to all readers. I was double checking the hook review, and the new link did not help me. I am sorry if I offended you. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

7564 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-06 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.304716140E09 +++$+++ Their brief reply follows.  I believe it illustrates they didn't read the definition of \"ad hominem\" I brought to their attention, and will continue to misuse the term in future.   +++$+++ Their brief reply follows.  I believe it illustrates they didn't read the definition of "ad hominem" I brought to their attention, and will continue to misuse the term in future.  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan#top|talk]]) 14:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
7565 +++$+++ Iqinn +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7564 +++$+++ 7564 +++$+++ 2011-05-06 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.304677200E09 +++$+++ Stop using [[Ad hominem]] it simply waste our time.  +++$+++ :Stop using [[Ad hominem]] it simply waste our time. [[User:Iqinn|IQinn]] ([[User talk:Iqinn|talk]]) 03:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
7566 +++$+++ Iqinn +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7564 +++$+++ 7565 +++$+++ 2011-05-06 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.304716440E09 +++$+++ I read it and you should stop [[Ad hominem]] and concentrate on the content. I guess it would really be the best you would agree to be mentored as the community suggest to you. It seems to be the case that you did not learn anything.  +++$+++ ::I read it and you should stop [[Ad hominem]] and concentrate on the content. I guess it would really be the best you would agree to be mentored as the community suggest to you. It seems to be the case that you did not learn anything. [[User:Iqinn|IQinn]] ([[User talk:Iqinn|talk]]) 14:14, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

7568 +++$+++ Iqinn +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-11 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.305150780E09 +++$+++ What is wrong with you?  +++$+++ What is wrong with you? [[User:Iqinn|IQinn]] ([[User talk:Iqinn|talk]]) 14:53, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
7569 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7568 +++$+++ 7568 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.305151200E09 +++$+++ I want the opinion of uninvolved third parties.  I believe that my initiation of the {{tl|puf}} discussion was a reasonable thing to do.   +++$+++ :I want the opinion of uninvolved third parties.  I believe that my initiation of the {{tl|puf}} discussion was a reasonable thing to do.  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan#top|talk]]) 15:00, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
7570 +++$+++ Iqinn +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7568 +++$+++ 7569 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.305151620E09 +++$+++ You do not need to edit warring for the opinion of uninvolved parties and these reverts are not about the copyright status. You have reverted multiple other edits including the use of primary sources against BLP. That is troublesome. I have opened a discussion here [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#User_Geo_Swan_continues_violation_of_BLP]]  +++$+++ ::You do not need to edit warring for the opinion of uninvolved parties and these reverts are not about the copyright status. You have reverted multiple other edits including the use of primary sources against BLP. That is troublesome. I have opened a discussion here [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#User_Geo_Swan_continues_violation_of_BLP]] [[User:Iqinn|IQinn]] ([[User talk:Iqinn|talk]]) 15:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
7571 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7568 +++$+++ 7570 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.305159180E09 +++$+++ I'll take a look at Bensayah Belkacem this afternoon.  If there is material I re-introduced with the image, that shouldn't have been re-introduced, I'll trim it.  I request some patience here.   +++$+++ :::I'll take a look at Bensayah Belkacem this afternoon.  If there is material I re-introduced with the image, that shouldn't have been re-introduced, I'll trim it.  I request some patience here.  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan#top|talk]]) 17:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
7572 +++$+++ Yachtsman1 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7568 +++$+++ 7568 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.305162420E09 +++$+++ '''COMMENT''' -  I have \"trimmed\" the article of primary source materials, and left a comment on the talk page.  This issue has been raised repeatedly. My suggestion would be to find secondary sources to confer notability, not primary sourced government documents.  Thank you.-- +++$+++ *'''COMMENT''' -  I have "trimmed" the article of primary source materials, and left a comment on the talk page.  This issue has been raised repeatedly. My suggestion would be to find secondary sources to confer notability, not primary sourced government documents.  Thank you.--[[User:Yachtsman1|Yachtsman1]] ([[User talk:Yachtsman1|talk]]) 18:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

269713 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-23 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.237863840E09 +++$+++ Yes, I know what you are thinking, another California politician.  Don't worry, it is just to avoid having no link in the Chotiner article.  I'm giving some thought to expanding an article I worked on a long time ago, [[Maynooth grant]].  Lot of potential there, and probably lots of old references.-- +++$+++ Yes, I know what you are thinking, another California politician.  Don't worry, it is just to avoid having no link in the Chotiner article.  I'm giving some thought to expanding an article I worked on a long time ago, [[Maynooth grant]].  Lot of potential there, and probably lots of old references.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 20:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269714 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269713 +++$+++ 269713 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.237864380E09 +++$+++ The articles of yours that have been most successful are those that involved an added dimension that allowed them to have general appeal, WWII and the holocaust, Robinson Crusoe ... Perhaps you can get Chotiers through FAC on pure grit and persistence, like the endless bishop articles that make it. If you live in Virginia, what is your attraction to California politicians?  &mdash; +++$+++ :The articles of yours that have been most successful are those that involved an added dimension that allowed them to have general appeal, WWII and the holocaust, Robinson Crusoe ... Perhaps you can get Chotiers through FAC on pure grit and persistence, like the endless bishop articles that make it. If you live in Virginia, what is your attraction to California politicians?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269715 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269713 +++$+++ 269714 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.237864620E09 +++$+++ Well, Lane came because I was researching cabinet members to see if I could find any Saxbe fixes Tony had missed.  The Nixon related articles are because I wrote a DYK following the death of Nixon's 1948 opponent, [[Stephen Zetterberg]], and that led me to Voorhis (which I've put in cold storage at GAN for a while) and I realized that Chotiner was more interesting.  I am really hoping that the Nixon connection will get it through.  People are fascinated by Nixon, love him or hate him.  I'm hoping for a Speer effect, though Nixon is no Hitler.-- +++$+++ ::Well, Lane came because I was researching cabinet members to see if I could find any Saxbe fixes Tony had missed.  The Nixon related articles are because I wrote a DYK following the death of Nixon's 1948 opponent, [[Stephen Zetterberg]], and that led me to Voorhis (which I've put in cold storage at GAN for a while) and I realized that Chotiner was more interesting.  I am really hoping that the Nixon connection will get it through.  People are fascinated by Nixon, love him or hate him.  I'm hoping for a Speer effect, though Nixon is no Hitler.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 20:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269716 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269713 +++$+++ 269715 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.237865160E09 +++$+++ I have to read through the article again, but is there enough about Nixon of interest in there? To me, you have to show a dramatic tension between Nixon and Chotiner, as there was between Wolters and Speer, to make it interesting. So much about Nixon is so very well known. If you could show that Chotiner really was Nixon's only \"friend\" and why.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I have to read through the article again, but is there enough about Nixon of interest in there? To me, you have to show a dramatic tension between Nixon and Chotiner, as there was between Wolters and Speer, to make it interesting. So much about Nixon is so very well known. If you could show that Chotiner really was Nixon's only "friend" and why.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269717 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269713 +++$+++ 269716 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.237865520E09 +++$+++ Chotiner kept his mouth shut for the most part.  I've got to get a copy of Nixon's memoirs and see what he says.  Damn, I wish there was more analysis of Chotiner.  I'm pretty sure that the reason why Nixon never gave him anything important after 1962 was that he was too controversial (Chotiner himself said a campaign manager has to be invisible) but I can't find anything for sure that says that was the reason.-- +++$+++ ::::Chotiner kept his mouth shut for the most part.  I've got to get a copy of Nixon's memoirs and see what he says.  Damn, I wish there was more analysis of Chotiner.  I'm pretty sure that the reason why Nixon never gave him anything important after 1962 was that he was too controversial (Chotiner himself said a campaign manager has to be invisible) but I can't find anything for sure that says that was the reason.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 20:32, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269718 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269713 +++$+++ 269717 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.237865820E09 +++$+++ Are you sure that he is missing in action because there is no \"there\" there. In other words, there is no more to say about him. No twisted secrets. Maybe his three wives? That is rather unusual for that era.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Are you sure that he is missing in action because there is no "there" there. In other words, there is no more to say about him. No twisted secrets. Maybe his three wives? That is rather unusual for that era.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269719 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269713 +++$+++ 269718 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.237866060E09 +++$+++ Four, actually.  There may be more; one newspaper refers to his \"sometimes troubled home life\".  They didn't always print all they knew back in the day.  What I really want to know is:  Why didn't Nixon involve him in Watergate? It was all hands on deck in the storm, and Chotiner seems to be sleeping below decks (reference is to the book of Jonah, if you are interested).-- +++$+++ ::::::Four, actually.  There may be more; one newspaper refers to his "sometimes troubled home life".  They didn't always print all they knew back in the day.  What I really want to know is:  Why didn't Nixon involve him in Watergate? It was all hands on deck in the storm, and Chotiner seems to be sleeping below decks (reference is to the book of Jonah, if you are interested).--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 20:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269720 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269713 +++$+++ 269719 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.237866540E09 +++$+++ Why was he not close to Nixon in Washington? Was he one of those people who burn out early? The article on him is anticlimactic because just as the going gets rough, Chotiner is dead and gone. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::Why was he not close to Nixon in Washington? Was he one of those people who burn out early? The article on him is anticlimactic because just as the going gets rough, Chotiner is dead and gone. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269721 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269713 +++$+++ 269720 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.237866840E09 +++$+++ I think he was dead meat as a campaign manager because you can't have a campaign manager who is himself an issue.  Well, OK, Lee Atwater.  I think Nixon decided that Chotiner was behind the times, he had all these new friends with the crew cuts like Haldeman and Ehrlichman, he just kept Chotiner around because he owed the guy something and wanted his advice.-- +++$+++ ::::::::I think he was dead meat as a campaign manager because you can't have a campaign manager who is himself an issue.  Well, OK, Lee Atwater.  I think Nixon decided that Chotiner was behind the times, he had all these new friends with the crew cuts like Haldeman and Ehrlichman, he just kept Chotiner around because he owed the guy something and wanted his advice.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 20:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269722 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269713 +++$+++ 269721 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.237867140E09 +++$+++ But Nixon's reactions in that transcript ...-- +++$+++ :::::::::But Nixon's reactions in that transcript ...--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 20:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269723 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269713 +++$+++ 269722 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.237867740E09 +++$+++ That is the thing about Nixon. He was oddly trusting. The cast of characters around him, Dean, Halderman, Erlich, Kissinger even; he was strangely open to them, as a man would be who did not have friends, did not know the difference between friends and associates. He selected those who were around him. Where was Chotiner?  The evidence that Wolters and Speer's wives remained close&mdash;there is nothing like that to show cement in Nixon's relationships. And now it turns out, he was one of the better presidents in many ways. Better then Carter; in some ways better than LBJ.   &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::That is the thing about Nixon. He was oddly trusting. The cast of characters around him, Dean, Halderman, Erlich, Kissinger even; he was strangely open to them, as a man would be who did not have friends, did not know the difference between friends and associates. He selected those who were around him. Where was Chotiner?  The evidence that Wolters and Speer's wives remained close&mdash;there is nothing like that to show cement in Nixon's relationships. And now it turns out, he was one of the better presidents in many ways. Better then Carter; in some ways better than LBJ.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

531859 +++$+++ Glebesam +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531859 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.241676960E09 +++$+++ Hi Somno, thank you for your comments on the above page, I appreciate you taking the time to consider the question.  You seem to know a great deal about editing wiki entries so I was wondering if I could ask you some questions.  Firstly, now that there has been some discussion about the inclusion of the film Fool Me Twice do you think I am now able to delete the reference to the film?  Also, if the film contains a number of copyright violations (I believe it uses music without the rights to do so and also photographs) is this grounds also to have the reference deleted?  I'd appreciate your advice.  Oh, and one last question, how can you support Freo and the Cats?  I know who I'd be behind if I had the choice! +++$+++ Hi Somno, thank you for your comments on the above page, I appreciate you taking the time to consider the question.  You seem to know a great deal about editing wiki entries so I was wondering if I could ask you some questions.  Firstly, now that there has been some discussion about the inclusion of the film Fool Me Twice do you think I am now able to delete the reference to the film?  Also, if the film contains a number of copyright violations (I believe it uses music without the rights to do so and also photographs) is this grounds also to have the reference deleted?  I'd appreciate your advice.  Oh, and one last question, how can you support Freo and the Cats?  I know who I'd be behind if I had the choice![[User:Glebesam|sc]] ([[User talk:Glebesam|talk]]) 23:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
531860 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531859 +++$+++ 531859 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.241689500E09 +++$+++ In regards to supporting two teams, it is a long story... Some Western Australians support two teams as a legacy from the days before WA had its own AFL teams - formerly some supported [[Victorian Football League|VFL]] teams based on whether their colours or nicknames matched [[West Australian Football League|WAFL]] teams - for example, supporters of the red-and-white [[South Fremantle Football Club]] may have supported the [[South Melbourne Football Club]] (now Sydney). How [[Swan Districts Football Club|Swan Districts]] ended up equalling [[Geelong Football Club|Geelong]] and not [[Collingwood Football Club|Collingwood]] in my family is one of those enduring mysteries. I became a [[West Coast Eagles]] supporter when WA finally got its own team, however, due to intra-family rivalries the Eagles ended up last on my list a few years after the [[Fremantle Dockers]] appeared. At the moment, it's quite good supporting two teams, because at least if Fremantle loses, there's probably a Geelong win to balance it out. :)  +++$+++ :In regards to supporting two teams, it is a long story... Some Western Australians support two teams as a legacy from the days before WA had its own AFL teams - formerly some supported [[Victorian Football League|VFL]] teams based on whether their colours or nicknames matched [[West Australian Football League|WAFL]] teams - for example, supporters of the red-and-white [[South Fremantle Football Club]] may have supported the [[South Melbourne Football Club]] (now Sydney). How [[Swan Districts Football Club|Swan Districts]] ended up equalling [[Geelong Football Club|Geelong]] and not [[Collingwood Football Club|Collingwood]] in my family is one of those enduring mysteries. I became a [[West Coast Eagles]] supporter when WA finally got its own team, however, due to intra-family rivalries the Eagles ended up last on my list a few years after the [[Fremantle Dockers]] appeared. At the moment, it's quite good supporting two teams, because at least if Fremantle loses, there's probably a Geelong win to balance it out. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 02:45, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
531861 +++$+++ Glebesam +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531859 +++$+++ 531860 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.241698680E09 +++$+++ Thanks again.   +++$+++ :: Thanks again.  [[User:Glebesam|sc]] ([[User talk:Glebesam|talk]]) 05:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
531862 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531859 +++$+++ 531861 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.241956860E09 +++$+++ Ah, yes, a South Australian would understand! I see you have removed the reference to ''Fool Me Twice''. If, as Japan1000 says, that is the only source for these claims, then the claims shouldn't be there at all so I definitely support its removal.  +++$+++ :::Ah, yes, a South Australian would understand! I see you have removed the reference to ''Fool Me Twice''. If, as Japan1000 says, that is the only source for these claims, then the claims shouldn't be there at all so I definitely support its removal. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 05:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
531863 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531859 +++$+++ 531859 +++$+++ 2009-05-11 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.242061140E09 +++$+++ No worries, now you know for next time. :) Regards,  +++$+++ :No worries, now you know for next time. :) Regards, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 09:59, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

263406 +++$+++ Deville +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263406 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-03 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.146640380E09 +++$+++ Yes, congrats from me as well -- +++$+++ Yes, congrats from me as well --[[User:Deville|Deville]] ([[User talk:Deville|Talk]]) 00:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
263407 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263406 +++$+++ 263406 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.146645600E09 +++$+++ Congrats from me too. If you ever need a hand with your new [[mop|superpowers]], feel free to drop me a note :)  +++$+++ :Congrats from me too. If you ever need a hand with your new [[mop|superpowers]], feel free to drop me a note :) [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 01:40, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

531864 +++$+++ TC1234 8923 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531864 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-15 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.242385380E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:TC1234 8923|TC1234 8923]] ([[User talk:TC1234 8923|talk]]) 04:03, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
531865 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531864 +++$+++ 531864 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.242385980E09 +++$+++ I have \"[[WP:user|userfied]]\" the article for you (which means I moved it to your userspace) here: [[User:TC1234 8923\/Army Staff Sergeant Richard S. Eaton Jr]]. This will allow you to work on the article to make a claim of significance, if possible, and preferably to reference the article using [[WP:reliable sources|reliable sources]]. Please ask if you have any questions. Regards,  +++$+++ :I have "[[WP:user|userfied]]" the article for you (which means I moved it to your userspace) here: [[User:TC1234 8923/Army Staff Sergeant Richard S. Eaton Jr]]. This will allow you to work on the article to make a claim of significance, if possible, and preferably to reference the article using [[WP:reliable sources|reliable sources]]. Please ask if you have any questions. Regards, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 04:13, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

531866 +++$+++ Enigmaman +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-19 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.242784800E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/Biasprotector|this]]  +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/Biasprotector|this]] [[User:Enigmaman|'''<font color="blue">Enigma</font>''']]<sup>[[User talk:Enigmaman|''<font color="#FFA500">msg</font>'']]</sup> 19:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
531867 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531866 +++$+++ 531866 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.242942780E09 +++$+++ I thought I missed out on the sockpuppet saga, but I see the article is still at DRV. Sigh.  +++$+++ :I thought I missed out on the sockpuppet saga, but I see the article is still at DRV. Sigh. [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 14:53, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
531868 +++$+++ Enigmaman +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531866 +++$+++ 531867 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.242960840E09 +++$+++ I removed it, but then Ricky asked me to put it back, so I did. What I really am interested in is a checkuser. I asked Luna Santin a few days ago, but he hasn't gotten back to me. Blocking the sock and not investigating further doesn't accomplish much. [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/IncidentArchive538#Public_reactions_to_death_of_Rachel_Corrie|archived AN\/I thread]].  +++$+++ ::I removed it, but then Ricky asked me to put it back, so I did. What I really am interested in is a checkuser. I asked Luna Santin a few days ago, but he hasn't gotten back to me. Blocking the sock and not investigating further doesn't accomplish much. [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive538#Public_reactions_to_death_of_Rachel_Corrie|archived AN/I thread]]. [[User:Enigmaman|'''<font color="blue">Enigma</font>''']]<sup>[[User talk:Enigmaman|''<font color="#FFA500">msg</font>'']]</sup> 19:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
531869 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531866 +++$+++ 531868 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.242987060E09 +++$+++ I think a checkuser would definitely be worthwhile. It is obviously a sock of another user and that user should be identified, even though the sock is blocked. Anyone with common sense would know that creating another account solely to disrupt the encyclopedia is not allowed and they should be held accountable.   +++$+++ :::I think a checkuser would definitely be worthwhile. It is obviously a sock of another user and that user should be identified, even though the sock is blocked. Anyone with common sense would know that creating another account solely to disrupt the encyclopedia is not allowed and they should be held accountable.  [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 03:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
531870 +++$+++ Enigmaman +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531866 +++$+++ 531869 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.243013400E09 +++$+++ [[User_talk:Luna_Santin#Checkuser.3F|unfortunate]]  +++$+++ ::::[[User_talk:Luna_Santin#Checkuser.3F|unfortunate]] [[User:Enigmaman|'''<font color="blue">Enigma</font>''']]<sup>[[User talk:Enigmaman|''<font color="#FFA500">msg</font>'']]</sup> 10:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

269724 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-23 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.237868160E09 +++$+++ (outdent) To sum it up, Nixon made a bad mistake and didn't admit it while the admitting might have done him some good.  Like Speer, he spent the final 15 years or so of his life working to improve what posterity would say about him.  Yes, someone like Chotiner should have been the person Nixon talked to, but I am sure that the new crowd saw him as an old fuddy duddy and a threat as well.-- +++$+++ (outdent) To sum it up, Nixon made a bad mistake and didn't admit it while the admitting might have done him some good.  Like Speer, he spent the final 15 years or so of his life working to improve what posterity would say about him.  Yes, someone like Chotiner should have been the person Nixon talked to, but I am sure that the new crowd saw him as an old fuddy duddy and a threat as well.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269725 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269724 +++$+++ 269724 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.237868580E09 +++$+++ The new crowd being Halderman, Erlich and Dean? You make it sound like Nixon and Chotiner were both passive recipients. I don't think of Nixon that way. His personal flaws formed his fate, not Halderman, Erlich, or Dean. Did not Chotiner have any effect on his own life? He was passive in all this?  &mdash; +++$+++ :The new crowd being Halderman, Erlich and Dean? You make it sound like Nixon and Chotiner were both passive recipients. I don't think of Nixon that way. His personal flaws formed his fate, not Halderman, Erlich, or Dean. Did not Chotiner have any effect on his own life? He was passive in all this?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
269726 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269724 +++$+++ 269725 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.237870500E09 +++$+++ No.  Chotiner made a choice.  His twenty years of investment in Nixon finally paid off, he went to Washington even though it cost him his marriage.  I don't think he was ever in the loop though.  Nixon had made new friends.-- +++$+++ ::No.  Chotiner made a choice.  His twenty years of investment in Nixon finally paid off, he went to Washington even though it cost him his marriage.  I don't think he was ever in the loop though.  Nixon had made new friends.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

569242 +++$+++ Edxx3 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-27 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.164700020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Edxx3|Edxx3]] 23:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
569243 +++$+++ Edxx3 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569242 +++$+++ 569242 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.164699900E09 +++$+++ A big fan of yours,  +++$+++ *A big fan of yours, [[User:Edxx3|Edxx3]] 23:45, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
569244 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569242 +++$+++ 569242 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.164701160E09 +++$+++ Sarcasm gets you nowhere.  If you want to become an administrator then you can read about the role at [[:Wikipedia:Administrators]].  You need 2-3000 edits in the major spaces of Wikipedia and these edits should be helpful contributions such as finding references using reliable sources, fighting vandals and contributing encyclopedic information to articles.  It is also very helpful to have between six and twelve months' experience of editing. I would start by reading the welcome salutation below and looking at the pages linked from there.  You can also help the project by joining Wikiprojects such as [[:Wikipedia:Esperanza]], where like-minded editors can exchange help and advice.  +++$+++ :Sarcasm gets you nowhere.  If you want to become an administrator then you can read about the role at [[:Wikipedia:Administrators]].  You need 2-3000 edits in the major spaces of Wikipedia and these edits should be helpful contributions such as finding references using reliable sources, fighting vandals and contributing encyclopedic information to articles.  It is also very helpful to have between six and twelve months' experience of editing. I would start by reading the welcome salutation below and looking at the pages linked from there.  You can also help the project by joining Wikiprojects such as [[:Wikipedia:Esperanza]], where like-minded editors can exchange help and advice. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 00:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

7583 +++$+++ Martinp +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-09 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.307620740E09 +++$+++ Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  +++$+++ Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. [[User:Martinp|Martinp]] ([[User talk:Martinp|talk]]) 04:59, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
7584 +++$+++ Martinp +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7583 +++$+++ 7583 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.307620920E09 +++$+++ Geo Swan, apologies for the automated Twinkle notification. This is of course in continuation 2 sections above. I noticed that you did't reply but have edited the article since then, so it seemed most expedient to bring this up for discussion at AFD.  +++$+++ :Geo Swan, apologies for the automated Twinkle notification. This is of course in continuation 2 sections above. I noticed that you did't reply but have edited the article since then, so it seemed most expedient to bring this up for discussion at AFD. [[User:Martinp|Martinp]] ([[User talk:Martinp|talk]]) 05:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
7585 +++$+++ Iqinn +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7583 +++$+++ 7583 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.307688540E09 +++$+++ Stop violating BLP by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Hafizullah_Shabaz_Khail&action=historysubmit&diff=433162833&oldid=428416742 by adding primary source \"crap\" to BLP's] as you have just done. The \"image\" violates BLP [[WP:MUG]] as it shows the individual in a false or disparaging light. Obviously not suitable to present the individual of a biography in that way. You clearly know about these issues and you have been warned by a large number of members of our community. Do listen to the community.  +++$+++ * Stop violating BLP by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hafizullah_Shabaz_Khail&action=historysubmit&diff=433162833&oldid=428416742 by adding primary source "crap" to BLP's] as you have just done. The "image" violates BLP [[WP:MUG]] as it shows the individual in a false or disparaging light. Obviously not suitable to present the individual of a biography in that way. You clearly know about these issues and you have been warned by a large number of members of our community. Do listen to the community. [[User:Iqinn|IQinn]] ([[User talk:Iqinn|talk]]) 23:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
7586 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7583 +++$+++ 7585 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.307812860E09 +++$+++ I think I need to point out that someone using the Iqinn ID on commons uploaded five wikileaked images: [[:File:Khirullah Khairkhwa.jpg]], [[:File:Hamidullah.jpg]], [[:File:Tolfiq Nassar Ahmed al Bihani.jpg]], [[:File:Abdallah Aiza al Matrafi.jpg]], [[:File:Abu Zubaydah.jpg]].  Were you aware of this?  Was that you?   +++$+++ ** I think I need to point out that someone using the Iqinn ID on commons uploaded five wikileaked images: [[:File:Khirullah Khairkhwa.jpg]], [[:File:Hamidullah.jpg]], [[:File:Tolfiq Nassar Ahmed al Bihani.jpg]], [[:File:Abdallah Aiza al Matrafi.jpg]], [[:File:Abu Zubaydah.jpg]].  Were you aware of this?  Was that you?  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan#top|talk]]) 10:21, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
7587 +++$+++ Iqinn +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7583 +++$+++ 7586 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.307814540E09 +++$+++ Is this your justification for violating BLP by adding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Hafizullah_Shabaz_Khail&action=historysubmit&diff=433162833&oldid=428416742 \xa0this crap \"image\"] to a BLP?  +++$+++ *** Is this your justification for violating BLP by adding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hafizullah_Shabaz_Khail&action=historysubmit&diff=433162833&oldid=428416742  this crap "image"] to a BLP? [[User:Iqinn|IQinn]] ([[User talk:Iqinn|talk]]) 10:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

269730 +++$+++ Vantine84 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-22 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.237734240E09 +++$+++ Over on [[T:TDYK]], I've added an explanation for [[Monster Kingdom: Jewel Summoner]].  Also, I may have to scrap the one for [[Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (video game)]], unless you have any alts for it. \u2014  <small><b><span style=\"border:1px solid#000000;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Chicago,sans-serif;\"> +++$+++ Over on [[T:TDYK]], I've added an explanation for [[Monster Kingdom: Jewel Summoner]].  Also, I may have to scrap the one for [[Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (video game)]], unless you have any alts for it. —  <small><b><span style="border:1px solid#000000;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Chicago,sans-serif;">[[User:Vantine84|<font color="#000000">Levi van Tine]] ([[User talk:Vantine84|t]] – [[Special:Contributions/Vantine84|c]])</font></span></b></small> 08:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
269731 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269730 +++$+++ 269730 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.237752360E09 +++$+++ There must be something in the article you can use as a hook! Is there an interesting or unusual part of the plot, or the protagonist, for example?  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :There must be something in the article you can use as a hook! Is there an interesting or unusual part of the plot, or the protagonist, for example?  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
269732 +++$+++ Vantine84 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269730 +++$+++ 269731 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.237755180E09 +++$+++ How about \"...that the [[PlayStation Portable]] [[video game]] '''''[[Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (video game)|Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem]]''''' had a shorter development cycle than the [[Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem|movie it was based on]]?\"  The source is the IGN preview page 2 (reference #8). \u2014  <small><b><span style=\"border:1px solid#000000;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Chicago,sans-serif;\"> +++$+++ ::How about "...that the [[PlayStation Portable]] [[video game]] '''''[[Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (video game)|Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem]]''''' had a shorter development cycle than the [[Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem|movie it was based on]]?"  The source is the IGN preview page 2 (reference #8). —  <small><b><span style="border:1px solid#000000;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Chicago,sans-serif;">[[User:Vantine84|<font color="#000000">Levi van Tine]] ([[User talk:Vantine84|t]] – [[Special:Contributions/Vantine84|c]])</font></span></b></small> 13:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
269733 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269730 +++$+++ 269732 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.237762800E09 +++$+++ I think that is an improvement. Perhaps it will help give ideas. (I have no idea how long video games take to develop versus a film.)  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I think that is an improvement. Perhaps it will help give ideas. (I have no idea how long video games take to develop versus a film.)  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
269734 +++$+++ Vantine84 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269730 +++$+++ 269733 +++$+++ 2009-03-28 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.238271120E09 +++$+++ Should be all set now. \u2014  <small><b><span style=\"border:1px solid#000000;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Chicago,sans-serif;\"> +++$+++ ::::Should be all set now. —  <small><b><span style="border:1px solid#000000;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Chicago,sans-serif;">[[User:Vantine84|<font color="#000000">Levi van Tine]] ([[User talk:Vantine84|t]] – [[Special:Contributions/Vantine84|c]])</font></span></b></small> 13:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

438171 +++$+++ Chaser +++$+++ BorgQueen +++$+++ 438171 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-08 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.297202640E09 +++$+++ I'm guessing the reason you did not use [[:File:Far side of the Sun 3D STEREO crop.jpg]] is because it was taken before the satellites reached 180 degrees of separation and it is therefore not a complete image of the far side. Frankly, I'm a bit peeved that NASA made this announcement without making such an image available. However, I still think that image is superior to one from 2007, as many people will expect the lead image to have something to do with the announcement. The 3D anaglyph, although from STEREO, is not a product of the situation that has been in the news for the past few days. I'd suggest the recent image and \"preliminary view pictured\" or something along those lines. What do you think?-- +++$+++ I'm guessing the reason you did not use [[:File:Far side of the Sun 3D STEREO crop.jpg]] is because it was taken before the satellites reached 180 degrees of separation and it is therefore not a complete image of the far side. Frankly, I'm a bit peeved that NASA made this announcement without making such an image available. However, I still think that image is superior to one from 2007, as many people will expect the lead image to have something to do with the announcement. The 3D anaglyph, although from STEREO, is not a product of the situation that has been in the news for the past few days. I'd suggest the recent image and "preliminary view pictured" or something along those lines. What do you think?--[[User:Chaser|Chaser]] 14:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
438172 +++$+++ BorgQueen +++$+++ BorgQueen +++$+++ 438171 +++$+++ 438171 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.297204080E09 +++$+++ I don't really mind. Please feel free to switch the image. -- +++$+++ :I don't really mind. Please feel free to switch the image. --[[User:BorgQueen|BorgQueen]] 14:28, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
438173 +++$+++ Chaser +++$+++ BorgQueen +++$+++ 438171 +++$+++ 438172 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.297222500E09 +++$+++ Done. Thank you.-- +++$+++ ::Done. Thank you.--[[User:Chaser|Chaser]] ([[User talk:Chaser|talk]]) 19:35, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

531876 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531876 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-22 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.242993960E09 +++$+++ Rule number one with journos (sorry David if you read this, I'll owe you another coffee or beer sometime) is never expect anything but wanting to make mileage out of tyops and idiocies of POV - (so maybe we should try keep as many of the super crawlers = ie pollies - on watch) and as for ''Indie - side cover'' - they dont need thanks for anything, but thats another story   +++$+++ Rule number one with journos (sorry David if you read this, I'll owe you another coffee or beer sometime) is never expect anything but wanting to make mileage out of tyops and idiocies of POV - (so maybe we should try keep as many of the super crawlers = ie pollies - on watch) and as for ''Indie - side cover'' - they dont need thanks for anything, but thats another story  [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 05:06, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
531877 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531876 +++$+++ 531876 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.243030080E09 +++$+++ I was surprised that nobody from the ALP fixed the article before I looked at it. Inside Cover is one of my fave sections of the paper (the other is the Letters page), so my thanks was more an overall thanks for entertaining me every day, rather than thanks for pointing out the issue with the article. :)  +++$+++ :I was surprised that nobody from the ALP fixed the article before I looked at it. Inside Cover is one of my fave sections of the paper (the other is the Letters page), so my thanks was more an overall thanks for entertaining me every day, rather than thanks for pointing out the issue with the article. :) [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 15:08, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
531878 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531876 +++$+++ 531877 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.243108440E09 +++$+++ Oh wellfor some the only ''real'' part of the worst is the funerals and deaths to make sure you dont miss the funerals of those whose careers families and lives and etc have crossed paths in this life... have missed so many funerals in the last 10 years its getting bad  +++$+++ ::Oh wellfor some the only ''real'' part of the worst is the funerals and deaths to make sure you dont miss the funerals of those whose careers families and lives and etc have crossed paths in this life... have missed so many funerals in the last 10 years its getting bad [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

7589 +++$+++ Sfan00 IMG +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.309285320E09 +++$+++ Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Sfan00 IMG|Sfan00 IMG]] ([[User talk:Sfan00 IMG|talk]]) 11:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
7590 +++$+++ GentlemanGhost +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7589 +++$+++ 7589 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.309649340E09 +++$+++ ''I don't think you started this one, but you've contributed to it a couple of times.'' -- +++$+++ :''I don't think you started this one, but you've contributed to it a couple of times.'' --[[User:GentlemanGhost|GentlemanGhost]] ([[User talk:GentlemanGhost|talk]]) 16:29, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

394481 +++$+++ Dr. Shaggeman +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394481 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.165455240E09 +++$+++ Dear Anthony, I am SysOp from the German language Wikipedia and I am sorry that your article was deleted on our project, well, we have criteria which are a little different from those in the English language version. Thats a pity for some toppics and with that some users but it is the way it is. However, I read what the IP wrote on your de-discussion page and I want you to know that he or she was not writing what most users in the de-project think about not native speaking people. So in the name of (I think the mayority) of de-users I have to apologize for such a behavior. And as you can see, my english is also not perfect. Best regards, -- +++$+++ Dear Anthony, I am SysOp from the German language Wikipedia and I am sorry that your article was deleted on our project, well, we have criteria which are a little different from those in the English language version. Thats a pity for some toppics and with that some users but it is the way it is. However, I read what the IP wrote on your de-discussion page and I want you to know that he or she was not writing what most users in the de-project think about not native speaking people. So in the name of (I think the mayority) of de-users I have to apologize for such a behavior. And as you can see, my english is also not perfect. Best regards, --[[User:Dr. Shaggeman|Dr. Shaggeman]] 17:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
394482 +++$+++ Dr. Shaggeman +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394481 +++$+++ 394481 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.165567320E09 +++$+++ Hi Anthony, I am not sure wether you have my de-talk-page on your watchlist, so i respond here. For an article about ''The Rule'' in de-wp it would be good to have maybe some prices they won or some chart position in the article or anything which is special in an NPOV way. de-, at-, ch-charts would be nice but uk- or us-charts should be enough. The problem is that obviously people in Germany do not know the band (and actually ''The Rule'' is a shitty name for searching in google). And also I think after somebody tried to fix your translation of the en-article the content was almost completely wrong (as compared with the en-article). With the translation I can help you, but with the rest of the job I can't. So, this was todays last action, \/me needs some sleep, it is gettin late, -- +++$+++ :Hi Anthony, I am not sure wether you have my de-talk-page on your watchlist, so i respond here. For an article about ''The Rule'' in de-wp it would be good to have maybe some prices they won or some chart position in the article or anything which is special in an NPOV way. de-, at-, ch-charts would be nice but uk- or us-charts should be enough. The problem is that obviously people in Germany do not know the band (and actually ''The Rule'' is a shitty name for searching in google). And also I think after somebody tried to fix your translation of the en-article the content was almost completely wrong (as compared with the en-article). With the translation I can help you, but with the rest of the job I can't. So, this was todays last action, /me needs some sleep, it is gettin late, --[[User:Dr. Shaggeman|Dr. Shaggeman]] 00:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
394483 +++$+++ Anthony5429 +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394481 +++$+++ 394482 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.165649280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help. I am starting a recreation of the artikel at http:\/\/de.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Benutzer:Anthony5429\/The_Rule. If you feel inclined to help. I am trying to translate it from English to German. Thanks! -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for your help. I am starting a recreation of the artikel at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Anthony5429/The_Rule. If you feel inclined to help. I am trying to translate it from English to German. Thanks! --[[User:Anthony5429|Anthony5429]] 23:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
394484 +++$+++ Dr._Shaggeman +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394481 +++$+++ 394483 +++$+++ 2006-12-09 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.165651860E09 +++$+++ I will take a look tomorrow. Surely I can help (at least with the translation and maybe with some formating stuff). I was taking a look around on some German webpages but unfortunately I found nothing about the band, so (I think) it will be difficult to prove the relevance for de-wp. But sometime being a sysop helps, or maybe wait a little till they are know here also ;-) --  +++$+++ :::I will take a look tomorrow. Surely I can help (at least with the translation and maybe with some formating stuff). I was taking a look around on some German webpages but unfortunately I found nothing about the band, so (I think) it will be difficult to prove the relevance for de-wp. But sometime being a sysop helps, or maybe wait a little till they are know here also ;-) -- [[User:Dr. Shaggeman|ShaggeDoc]] <small>[[User talk:Dr._Shaggeman|talk]]</small> 00:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

7592 +++$+++ GentlemanGhost +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-17 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.310957520E09 +++$+++ Nice work on the refs, too! -- +++$+++ Nice work on the refs, too! --[[User:GentlemanGhost|GentlemanGhost]] ([[User talk:GentlemanGhost|talk]]) 19:52, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
7593 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7592 +++$+++ 7592 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310958300E09 +++$+++ What her article really needs is a couple of nice free photos.  One of the references I came across said that her beauty was balanced by her being an uncontrollable chain-smoker.   +++$+++ :What her article really needs is a couple of nice free photos.  One of the references I came across said that her beauty was balanced by her being an uncontrollable chain-smoker.  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan#top|talk]]) 20:05, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

269738 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269738 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-25 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.237969680E09 +++$+++ importScript('User:Dr_pda\/prosesize.js'); \" into your monobook.js (without the quotes). It would be [[User:GaryColemanFan\/monobook.js]]. Just paste it in, or create it first, if you do not have one.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ importScript('User:Dr_pda/prosesize.js'); " into your monobook.js (without the quotes). It would be [[User:GaryColemanFan/monobook.js]]. Just paste it in, or create it first, if you do not have one.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
269739 +++$+++ GaryColemanFan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269738 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.238021940E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your help. I got the prosesize tool added, which will make future DYK suggestions easier. I also figured out why there was such a difference in our initial figures&mdash;the prosesize tool includes footnotes and section headers, both of which I wasn't counting. Anyhow, I added more information to the article so that it should meet the expansion criterion. Best wishes,  +++$+++ ::::Thanks again for your help. I got the prosesize tool added, which will make future DYK suggestions easier. I also figured out why there was such a difference in our initial figures&mdash;the prosesize tool includes footnotes and section headers, both of which I wasn't counting. Anyhow, I added more information to the article so that it should meet the expansion criterion. Best wishes, [[User:GaryColemanFan|GaryColemanFan]] ([[User talk:GaryColemanFan|talk]]) 15:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

7596 +++$+++ Cloveapple +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310526780E09 +++$+++ Or, if you are comfortable with it, could I collaborate on it while it's in your use space to help get it ready for rough seas ahead?  +++$+++ Or, if you are comfortable with it, could I collaborate on it while it's in your use space to help get it ready for rough seas ahead? [[User:Cloveapple|Cloveapple]] ([[User talk:Cloveapple|talk]]) 20:13, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7597 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7596 +++$+++ 7596 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310707080E09 +++$+++ I responded via email.   +++$+++ :I responded via email.  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan#top|talk]]) 22:18, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

531885 +++$+++ Pdfpdf +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-15 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.245092520E09 +++$+++ Yes please, go ahead. No, I most certainly do not object. And thank you for asking first! Cheers,  +++$+++ Yes please, go ahead. No, I most certainly do not object. And thank you for asking first! Cheers, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 12:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
531886 +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ Somno +++$+++ 531885 +++$+++ 531885 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.246568880E09 +++$+++ Hi Primarchus. The Geelong Football Club meets the [[WP:notability|notability]] criteria and information about the club is [[WP:V|verifiable]]. If you can show that The Cowboy Bebop Experience has received non-trivial coverage in multiple independent, [[WP:reliable sources|reliable sources]], the group might qualify for a Wikipedia article, however, the article I deleted met speedy deletion criterion [[WP:CSD#A7|A7]]. Best wishes,  +++$+++ :Hi Primarchus. The Geelong Football Club meets the [[WP:notability|notability]] criteria and information about the club is [[WP:V|verifiable]]. If you can show that The Cowboy Bebop Experience has received non-trivial coverage in multiple independent, [[WP:reliable sources|reliable sources]], the group might qualify for a Wikipedia article, however, the article I deleted met speedy deletion criterion [[WP:CSD#A7|A7]]. Best wishes, [[User:Somno|Somno]] ([[User talk:Somno#top|talk]]) 14:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

269742 +++$+++ Peeky44 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269742 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-27 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.238196900E09 +++$+++ I'd quite like to see this article pass the DYK criteria before its time runs out.  I have made changes to the article, at least partly based on [[Template talk:Did you know#Railways on the Isle of Wight|your suggestions]], plus I've commented on the original ALT hook and supplied another which I feel better reflects the article content.  There doesn't seem to be any further progress.  Could you take another look and comment further please?  Thanks, -- +++$+++ I'd quite like to see this article pass the DYK criteria before its time runs out.  I have made changes to the article, at least partly based on [[Template talk:Did you know#Railways on the Isle of Wight|your suggestions]], plus I've commented on the original ALT hook and supplied another which I feel better reflects the article content.  There doesn't seem to be any further progress.  Could you take another look and comment further please?  Thanks, --[[User:Peeky44|Peeky44]] ([[User talk:Peeky44|talk]]) 16:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
269743 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269742 +++$+++ 269742 +++$+++ 2009-03-27 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.238197020E09 +++$+++ OK.  &mdash; +++$+++ :OK.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

544739 +++$+++ Justinm1978 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-08 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.197109020E09 +++$+++ That was awfully quick, considering that it was open for less than 12 hours.  Since I must now do them individually, must they be considered \"Second Nominations\" if I put them up again?  +++$+++ That was awfully quick, considering that it was open for less than 12 hours.  Since I must now do them individually, must they be considered "Second Nominations" if I put them up again? [[User:Justinm1978|Justinm1978]] ([[User talk:Justinm1978|talk]]) 02:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
544740 +++$+++ Justinm1978 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544739 +++$+++ 544739 +++$+++ 2007-12-08 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.197110400E09 +++$+++ \"More notable\" doesn't mean that it will still pass [[WP:NOTABLE]], and you still didn't answer when I do them individually that I'll have to list it as a second nomination or not.  +++$+++ :"More notable" doesn't mean that it will still pass [[WP:NOTABLE]], and you still didn't answer when I do them individually that I'll have to list it as a second nomination or not. [[User:Justinm1978|Justinm1978]] ([[User talk:Justinm1978|talk]]) 02:40, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

7600 +++$+++ R. Baley +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311067740E09 +++$+++ Hi Geo, I recently ran across a photo you uploaded to commons and added it to the [[Charles Swift]] article. I wasn't able to access the source webpage pdf, and was wondering if you still had access to it or could send to me any further info about the circumstances surrounding the press conference. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Geo, I recently ran across a photo you uploaded to commons and added it to the [[Charles Swift]] article. I wasn't able to access the source webpage pdf, and was wondering if you still had access to it or could send to me any further info about the circumstances surrounding the press conference. Thanks, [[User:R. Baley|R. Baley]] ([[User talk:R. Baley|talk]]) 02:29, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
7601 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7600 +++$+++ 7600 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.311109020E09 +++$+++ Here are some other DoD documents that mention Swift's role...   +++$+++ :Here are some other DoD documents that mention Swift's role...  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan#top|talk]]) 13:57, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

531889 +++$+++ Dantadd +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-06 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.141699920E09 +++$+++ Ok, I will translate the article as soon as I can. Greetings, -- +++$+++ Ok, I will translate the article as soon as I can. Greetings, --[[User:Dantadd|Dantadd]] 18:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
531890 +++$+++ DaB. +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531889 +++$+++ 531889 +++$+++ 2006-03-08 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.141807800E09 +++$+++ Hello. You ask in de: a bot for help ;-). Others and I are trying to fix this articel at the moment, thanks for yor translation :-). -- +++$+++ :Hello. You ask in de: a bot for help ;-). Others and I are trying to fix this articel at the moment, thanks for yor translation :-). --[[User:DaB.|DaB.]] 00:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

263411 +++$+++ Master Jay +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-02 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.146635820E09 +++$+++ Just so you are aware, there was a dispute over the notability, etc, of the article [[The puya]]. To allow for proper discussion and put out the edit wars, I have taken the interim step of restoring the article, therefore, a more appropriate AfD can be held. Thanks -- +++$+++ Just so you are aware, there was a dispute over the notability, etc, of the article [[The puya]]. To allow for proper discussion and put out the edit wars, I have taken the interim step of restoring the article, therefore, a more appropriate AfD can be held. Thanks --[[User:Master Jay|<font style="background:black">'''<font color="white">Jay</font>'''</font>]]'''<font style="background:gold">([[User talk:Master Jay|Reply]])'''</font> 22:57, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
263412 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263411 +++$+++ 263411 +++$+++ 2006-05-02 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.146635880E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks. I wasn't aware.  +++$+++ :OK, thanks. I wasn't aware. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:58, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

7604 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312320240E09 +++$+++ Thanks   +++$+++ Thanks  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 14:24, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
7605 +++$+++ BoogaLouie +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7604 +++$+++ 7604 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.312330560E09 +++$+++ There was none. Since [[Jama'at al-Muslimin]] was crushed and Shukri Mustafa executed, I thought there was enough of a distinction between [[Jama'at al-Muslimin]] and any succeeding groups calling themselves Takfir wal-Hijra to have separate articles (if for no other reason than [[Jama'at al-Muslimin]] objected to being  called  Takfir wal-Hijra). I originally only created a redirect from Takfir wal-Hijra to [[Jama'at al-Muslimin]], but then I found a lot of sources on  Takfir wal-Hijra from old versions of the article, so I created a separate article. Do you object to the dividing of the article? -- +++$+++ :There was none. Since [[Jama'at al-Muslimin]] was crushed and Shukri Mustafa executed, I thought there was enough of a distinction between [[Jama'at al-Muslimin]] and any succeeding groups calling themselves Takfir wal-Hijra to have separate articles (if for no other reason than [[Jama'at al-Muslimin]] objected to being  called  Takfir wal-Hijra). I originally only created a redirect from Takfir wal-Hijra to [[Jama'at al-Muslimin]], but then I found a lot of sources on  Takfir wal-Hijra from old versions of the article, so I created a separate article. Do you object to the dividing of the article? --[[User:BoogaLouie|BoogaLouie]] ([[User talk:BoogaLouie#top|talk]]) 17:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
7606 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7604 +++$+++ 7605 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312330920E09 +++$+++ Let's conduct this discussion on [[Talk:Jama'at al-Muslimin]].   +++$+++ ::Let's conduct this discussion on [[Talk:Jama'at al-Muslimin]].  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan#top|talk]]) 17:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

7607 +++$+++ RafikiSykes +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7607 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.312419300E09 +++$+++ I didnt want to get the sonny and cher toys AFD off topic but your comment was brilliant I am still laughing. +++$+++ I didnt want to get the sonny and cher toys AFD off topic but your comment was brilliant I am still laughing.[[User:RafikiSykes|RafikiSykes]] ([[User talk:RafikiSykes|talk]]) 17:55, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
7608 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ 7607 +++$+++ 7607 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312422960E09 +++$+++ Glad you liked it.   +++$+++ :Glad you liked it.  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan#top|talk]]) 18:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

269752 +++$+++ Anonymous Dissident +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269752 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-30 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.238396640E09 +++$+++ Best wishes, &mdash;<strong> +++$+++ Best wishes, &mdash;<strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 00:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269753 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269752 +++$+++ 269752 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.238397360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for responding to my query. I am not asking about a specific situation, since I have asked that question of candidates long before that RFC was opened.  However, I understand that the topic in general is a sensitive, and one that only the newer folk are willing to address. C'est la vie!  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks for responding to my query. I am not asking about a specific situation, since I have asked that question of candidates long before that RFC was opened.  However, I understand that the topic in general is a sensitive, and one that only the newer folk are willing to address. C'est la vie!  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269754 +++$+++ Anonymous Dissident +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269752 +++$+++ 269753 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.238424900E09 +++$+++ Not at all; I thank you for appreciating my position with regard to your question. &mdash;<strong> +++$+++ ::Not at all; I thank you for appreciating my position with regard to your question. &mdash;<strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 07:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269755 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269752 +++$+++ 269754 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.238445720E09 +++$+++ Thank you again for your message and willingness to respond. I do not think I can vote for you however, as the issue I raised has caused  much bad blood on Wikipedia and has  cast such  a pall that still lies over all. I think that until the entrenched elements, including Arbcom, firmly deals with this behavior on the part of entitled editors, Wikipedia will remain a frequently ugly experience. There are a group of editors, a    less entrenched group, that seem to have a firmer stance on civility  and it is there where I believe hope lies. I want to believe that you are a member of this latter, wonderful group, as I have only seen you respond well to others and never witnessed untoward behavior on your part.    Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Thank you again for your message and willingness to respond. I do not think I can vote for you however, as the issue I raised has caused  much bad blood on Wikipedia and has  cast such  a pall that still lies over all. I think that until the entrenched elements, including Arbcom, firmly deals with this behavior on the part of entitled editors, Wikipedia will remain a frequently ugly experience. There are a group of editors, a    less entrenched group, that seem to have a firmer stance on civility  and it is there where I believe hope lies. I want to believe that you are a member of this latter, wonderful group, as I have only seen you respond well to others and never witnessed untoward behavior on your part.    Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

7611 +++$+++ Gadget850 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-14 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.281813000E09 +++$+++ When you remove {{tl|Non-free Scout logo}}, you are also removing the category. Please place those images into some category so that we don't loose them. ---'''''\u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ When you remove {{tl|Non-free Scout logo}}, you are also removing the category. Please place those images into some category so that we don't loose them. ---'''''—&nbsp;[[User:Gadget850|<span style="color:gray">Gadget850&nbsp;(Ed)</span>]]<span style="color:darkblue">&nbsp;'''''</span><sup>[[User talk:Gadget850|''talk'']]</sup> 12:10, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
7612 +++$+++ Gadget850 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7611 +++$+++ 7611 +++$+++ 2010-08-14 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.281813120E09 +++$+++ You also need to change the rationale from non-free. And they should be marked for move to Commons. ---'''''\u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ :You also need to change the rationale from non-free. And they should be marked for move to Commons. ---'''''—&nbsp;[[User:Gadget850|<span style="color:gray">Gadget850&nbsp;(Ed)</span>]]<span style="color:darkblue">&nbsp;'''''</span><sup>[[User talk:Gadget850|''talk'']]</sup> 12:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
7613 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7611 +++$+++ 7612 +++$+++ 2010-08-14 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.281817140E09 +++$+++ Also, you have several ZHP images marked ZHR. They are separate competing orgs, just the name is close in Polish. They should all be ZHP.-- +++$+++ ::Also, you have several ZHP images marked ZHR. They are separate competing orgs, just the name is close in Polish. They should all be ZHP.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 13:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
7614 +++$+++ Gadget850 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7611 +++$+++ 7612 +++$+++ 2010-08-14 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.281831240E09 +++$+++ Tag any that need to be renamed. ---'''''\u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Tag any that need to be renamed. ---'''''—&nbsp;[[User:Gadget850|<span style="color:gray">Gadget850&nbsp;(Ed)</span>]]<span style="color:darkblue">&nbsp;'''''</span><sup>[[User talk:Gadget850|''talk'']]</sup> 17:14, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

269756 +++$+++ Nvvchar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-30 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.238424660E09 +++$+++ Please let me know if there are still any problems to be resolved in the DYK.I have clarified on the issues of religious places given in Hindua as the only source I could get on the web.Thanks-- +++$+++ Please let me know if there are still any problems to be resolved in the DYK.I have clarified on the issues of religious places given in Hindua as the only source I could get on the web.Thanks--[[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]) 07:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269757 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269756 +++$+++ 269756 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.238447640E09 +++$+++ No problems, as given the situation, what you have is reasonable and rewording is not necessary.  &mdash; +++$+++ :No problems, as given the situation, what you have is reasonable and rewording is not necessary.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269758 +++$+++ Tivedshambo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269756 +++$+++ 269756 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.238430840E09 +++$+++ Ignore that - I think you meant the {{tl|translate}} tag, not {{tl|translated}}&nbsp;\u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ :Ignore that - I think you meant the {{tl|translate}} tag, not {{tl|translated}}&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Tivedshambo|<span style="color:#7F0000">'''&nbsp;Tivedshambo&nbsp;'''</span>]]&nbsp;([[User Talk:Tivedshambo|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Tivedshambo|c]]) 09:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

531901 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531901 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-12 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.144880340E09 +++$+++ Ali pogledajte [[Bosnian language]]. Ja sam samo definirao ono sto pise u Bosanskome pravilnom pisanju. Pise da se koriste i latinica i cirilica. -- +++$+++ Ali pogledajte [[Bosnian language]]. Ja sam samo definirao ono sto pise u Bosanskome pravilnom pisanju. Pise da se koriste i latinica i cirilica. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 15:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
531902 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531901 +++$+++ 531901 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.144881360E09 +++$+++ No idea what you meant with this personal attack. I'm not from Gazimestan, not from Serbia. The Serbo-Croatian will never be extinct, as the whole world says (Brockhaus' wikipedia, Infoplease and even wikipedia) The mere reason is [[romantic nationalism]] which made every nation have its own language like in the [[19th century]]. The Serbs and Croats are free to choose whatever they want a name for thweir language to be, but illogical fallacy is to claim that their languages are not one. Sincerely. -- +++$+++ :No idea what you meant with this personal attack. I'm not from Gazimestan, not from Serbia. The Serbo-Croatian will never be extinct, as the whole world says (Brockhaus' wikipedia, Infoplease and even wikipedia) The mere reason is [[romantic nationalism]] which made every nation have its own language like in the [[19th century]]. The Serbs and Croats are free to choose whatever they want a name for thweir language to be, but illogical fallacy is to claim that their languages are not one. Sincerely. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 15:36, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

269759 +++$+++ Kelapstick +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269759 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-30 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.238473020E09 +++$+++ I just saw your Alternate hook for [[Anaconda Copper Mine (Nevada)]].  [[Weed Heights, Nevada|Weed Heights]] became a ghost town at the time I suppose (not sure, I wasn't here then), but now that it is owned by the county commissioner, is all rental property (so it's not a ghost town any more, would that make it a ghost town that has been [[resurrection|resurrected]]?).  I don't know if the hook should be changed or not (since it is correct, maybe incomplete, I couldn't find a source about the rental property though), but I thought you might want to know.  Thanks!-- +++$+++ I just saw your Alternate hook for [[Anaconda Copper Mine (Nevada)]].  [[Weed Heights, Nevada|Weed Heights]] became a ghost town at the time I suppose (not sure, I wasn't here then), but now that it is owned by the county commissioner, is all rental property (so it's not a ghost town any more, would that make it a ghost town that has been [[resurrection|resurrected]]?).  I don't know if the hook should be changed or not (since it is correct, maybe incomplete, I couldn't find a source about the rental property though), but I thought you might want to know.  Thanks!--[[User:Kelapstick|kelapstick]] ([[User talk:Kelapstick|talk]]) 21:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269760 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269759 +++$+++ 269759 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.238473740E09 +++$+++ Oh no! I don't even see the ghost town bit in the article. I don't normally ever make things up for a hook. But I looked through all the sources and I don't see ghost town anywhere. I will change it.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Oh no! I don't even see the ghost town bit in the article. I don't normally ever make things up for a hook. But I looked through all the sources and I don't see ghost town anywhere. I will change it.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269761 +++$+++ Kelapstick +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269759 +++$+++ 269760 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.238474040E09 +++$+++ In hindsight I did mention it was a rental community (should have checked the article I wrote before I talked about it...d'oh!), at least we caught it before it made the main page!  I suppose anyone living in Weed Heights might take exception to Wikipedia calling their community a ghost town!  Thanks, and happy editing.-- +++$+++ ::In hindsight I did mention it was a rental community (should have checked the article I wrote before I talked about it...d'oh!), at least we caught it before it made the main page!  I suppose anyone living in Weed Heights might take exception to Wikipedia calling their community a ghost town!  Thanks, and happy editing.--[[User:Kelapstick|kelapstick]] ([[User talk:Kelapstick|talk]]) 21:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269762 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269759 +++$+++ 269761 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.238474520E09 +++$+++ Can you think of a substitute hook, or should I not suggest a replacement?  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Can you think of a substitute hook, or should I not suggest a replacement?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269763 +++$+++ Kelapstick +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269759 +++$+++ 269762 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.238475480E09 +++$+++ Not particularly interesting I suppose...if you can think of a better one, by all means.-- +++$+++ ::::Not particularly interesting I suppose...if you can think of a better one, by all means.--[[User:Kelapstick|kelapstick]] ([[User talk:Kelapstick|talk]]) 21:58, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269764 +++$+++ Kelapstick +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269759 +++$+++ 269759 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.238476380E09 +++$+++ I modified it a bit, the \"Weed Heights\" part was just kind of hanging there.  Also make sure there is a (Nevada) after \"Anaconda Copper Mine\" it will link to a mine in Montana rather if there isn't (there is a proposal for standardizing the title of two mines with the same name at [[WP:MINING]]).  I also depluralized the word \"waste\", it just sounded odd (even though that is how it was reported).-- +++$+++ :I modified it a bit, the "Weed Heights" part was just kind of hanging there.  Also make sure there is a (Nevada) after "Anaconda Copper Mine" it will link to a mine in Montana rather if there isn't (there is a proposal for standardizing the title of two mines with the same name at [[WP:MINING]]).  I also depluralized the word "waste", it just sounded odd (even though that is how it was reported).--[[User:Kelapstick|kelapstick]] ([[User talk:Kelapstick|talk]]) 22:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269765 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269759 +++$+++ 269761 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.238476920E09 +++$+++ You can see how I reported it at [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Queue_5__mistake|DYK: Queue 5 mistake]].  See what you think, and you can add your comments.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::* You can see how I reported it at [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Queue_5__mistake|DYK: Queue 5 mistake]].  See what you think, and you can add your comments.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269766 +++$+++ Kelapstick +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269759 +++$+++ 269761 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.238477760E09 +++$+++ Both hooks look good to me, thanks for your help!-- +++$+++ :::Both hooks look good to me, thanks for your help!--[[User:Kelapstick|kelapstick]] ([[User talk:Kelapstick|talk]]) 22:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
269767 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269759 +++$+++ 269766 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.238477940E09 +++$+++ Good! I feel really bad for screwing it up.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Good! I feel really bad for screwing it up.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

7617 +++$+++ Traveler100 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-15 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.281909180E09 +++$+++ I am a little unclear on the article if it is a specific tree or about the type of tree [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Cryptomeria_japonica cryptomeria_japonica]. Just wondering if one of the images on this link will do for the article?-- +++$+++ I am a little unclear on the article if it is a specific tree or about the type of tree [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cryptomeria_japonica cryptomeria_japonica]. Just wondering if one of the images on this link will do for the article?--[[User:Traveler100|Traveler100]] ([[User talk:Traveler100|talk]]) 14:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
7618 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7617 +++$+++ 7617 +++$+++ 2010-08-15 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.281909360E09 +++$+++ I believe, based on the wording, that it is the type of tree, not a specific one. You do great legwork!-- +++$+++ :I believe, based on the wording, that it is the type of tree, not a specific one. You do great legwork!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 14:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

350795 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-09 11:13:00 +++$+++ 1.260385980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 11:13, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
350796 +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350795 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-09 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.260422940E09 +++$+++ I did not acknowledge because the only thing that I could answer is a triviality: removing material \"''could'' to some appear as censorship\", just like adding material \"''could'' to some appear as propaganda\". From that point, one has to either renounce doing anything ever, or admit that all coins have two sides and do for the best.  +++$+++ :: I did not acknowledge because the only thing that I could answer is a triviality: removing material "''could'' to some appear as censorship", just like adding material "''could'' to some appear as propaganda". From that point, one has to either renounce doing anything ever, or admit that all coins have two sides and do for the best. [[User:Rama|Rama]] ([[User talk:Rama#top|talk]]) 21:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
350797 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350795 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.260467580E09 +++$+++ The question was \"What harm does it do having it there ?  +++$+++ ::: The question was "What harm does it do having it there ? [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 09:53, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
350798 +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350795 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.260467640E09 +++$+++ It does the harm of passing Wikipedia as a low-quality medium written by people who cannot tell a personal blog from an authoritative source.  +++$+++ :::: It does the harm of passing Wikipedia as a low-quality medium written by people who cannot tell a personal blog from an authoritative source. [[User:Rama|Rama]] ([[User talk:Rama#top|talk]]) 09:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
350799 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350795 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 10:25:00 +++$+++ 1.260469500E09 +++$+++ It was in the further reading section, not passing it self off as anything - it was saying to the reader of the artical \"if you want more information you ''may'' want to look here\".  I disagree with your premis that a personal blog '''can not''' be an authoritative source.  Did you read the artical before you deleted the link or did you just do it because the URL had blog in it ?  +++$+++ ::::: It was in the further reading section, not passing it self off as anything - it was saying to the reader of the artical "if you want more information you ''may'' want to look here".  I disagree with your premis that a personal blog '''can not''' be an authoritative source.  Did you read the artical before you deleted the link or did you just do it because the URL had blog in it ? [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 10:25, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
350800 +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350795 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 10:42:00 +++$+++ 1.260470520E09 +++$+++ I am not saying that a personal blog cannot be authoritative (counter-example: [http:\/\/www.maitre-eolas.fr\/]). I am saying that, as far as I can see, this particular blog in ''only'' a personal blog.  +++$+++ :::::: I am not saying that a personal blog cannot be authoritative (counter-example: [http://www.maitre-eolas.fr/]). I am saying that, as far as I can see, this particular blog in ''only'' a personal blog. [[User:Rama|Rama]] ([[User talk:Rama#top|talk]]) 10:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
350801 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350795 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.260471240E09 +++$+++ I still don't understand you point - what you mean by \"''only'' a personal blog\" - and what is the problem with that ? Also can you answer the other question I asked - Namily did you read the artical before you deleted the link or did you just do it because the URL had blog in it ?  +++$+++ ::::::: I still don't understand you point - what you mean by "''only'' a personal blog" - and what is the problem with that ? Also can you answer the other question I asked - Namily did you read the artical before you deleted the link or did you just do it because the URL had blog in it ? [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 10:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
350802 +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350795 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.260479520E09 +++$+++ I mean \"only a personal blog\" to be an attempt at politely say that this is a blog by some random chap without any particular education or authority to give his statements any importance. I think that advertising this sort of blogs gives the impression that Wikipedia editors are incapable of telling relevant and authoritative commentators from armchair philosophers, which is marginally harmful for the project.  +++$+++ :::::::: I mean "only a personal blog" to be an attempt at politely say that this is a blog by some random chap without any particular education or authority to give his statements any importance. I think that advertising this sort of blogs gives the impression that Wikipedia editors are incapable of telling relevant and authoritative commentators from armchair philosophers, which is marginally harmful for the project. [[User:Rama|Rama]] ([[User talk:Rama#top|talk]]) 13:12, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
350803 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350795 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.260488160E09 +++$+++ '''''this is a blog by some random chap without any particular education or authority''''' you mean other than a degree in politics - for example one other link on the page is to a artical written by a ''Swiss national who currently works in New York'' who if you look up lists his practice areas as ''competition law, as well as banking and financial law''. How is that any diffrent ?   +++$+++ ::::::::: '''''this is a blog by some random chap without any particular education or authority''''' you mean other than a degree in politics - for example one other link on the page is to a artical written by a ''Swiss national who currently works in New York'' who if you look up lists his practice areas as ''competition law, as well as banking and financial law''. How is that any diffrent ?  [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 15:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
350804 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350795 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.260820080E09 +++$+++ I am intrigued as to the answer to this question?  +++$+++ :::::::::: I am intrigued as to the answer to this question? [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 11:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
350805 +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350795 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.260821640E09 +++$+++ 2) Assuming your characterisation of this second link is accurate, there is little difference between your anecdotical blog and this anecdotical blog; this would entail that this second anecdotical blog should be removed too, not that anecdotical blogs are becomming a must.  +++$+++ ::::::::::: 2) Assuming your characterisation of this second link is accurate, there is little difference between your anecdotical blog and this anecdotical blog; this would entail that this second anecdotical blog should be removed too, not that anecdotical blogs are becomming a must. [[User:Rama|Rama]] ([[User talk:Rama#top|talk]]) 12:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

7620 +++$+++ De728631 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-16 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.282016580E09 +++$+++ Hello Kintetsubuffalo. I've come across your tagging of this page and would like to remind you that {{t|notenglish}} should really only be used for articles in the article namespace. If you would like to have it translated, please list the page at the \"Cleanup\" section at [[WP:PNT]] with a short explanation. It has to go there because the \"Pages for consideration\" section is reserved for articles, and pages listed there have a deadline of 14 days. If you have more questions about translations, please ask them here, I'll watch your page. Regards,  +++$+++ Hello Kintetsubuffalo. I've come across your tagging of this page and would like to remind you that {{t|notenglish}} should really only be used for articles in the article namespace. If you would like to have it translated, please list the page at the "Cleanup" section at [[WP:PNT]] with a short explanation. It has to go there because the "Pages for consideration" section is reserved for articles, and pages listed there have a deadline of 14 days. If you have more questions about translations, please ask them here, I'll watch your page. Regards, [[User:De728631|De728631]] ([[User talk:De728631|talk]]) 20:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
7621 +++$+++ De728631 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7620 +++$+++ 7620 +++$+++ 2010-08-19 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.282271100E09 +++$+++ I've gone ahead now and translated the titles and quotations on that page; but only because I remembered to have look at it, not because it was marked at \"Pages needing translation\". The \"notenglish\" template does not automatically list the page at [[WP:PNT]], that's why there is an instruction on the template tag. You have to do that yourself after tagging a page. That said, good luck with future Pfadfinder articles.  +++$+++ :I've gone ahead now and translated the titles and quotations on that page; but only because I remembered to have look at it, not because it was marked at "Pages needing translation". The "notenglish" template does not automatically list the page at [[WP:PNT]], that's why there is an instruction on the template tag. You have to do that yourself after tagging a page. That said, good luck with future Pfadfinder articles. [[User:De728631|De728631]] ([[User talk:De728631|talk]]) 19:25, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
7622 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7620 +++$+++ 7620 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.282312380E09 +++$+++ That's wonderful, thank you so much for your help! Also thank you for the legwork, I don't know everything, so it's nice that others know things I don't! :) -- +++$+++ :That's wonderful, thank you so much for your help! Also thank you for the legwork, I don't know everything, so it's nice that others know things I don't! :) --[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 06:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

531909 +++$+++  +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531909 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-13 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.144955820E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 12:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
531910 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531909 +++$+++ 531909 +++$+++ 2006-04-13 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.144959180E09 +++$+++ You acused me to Emir Arven of saying bad things, but I only stated that he was defending the Cyrillic scrypt from Serbinization. Why did you interpret it that way? -- +++$+++ :You acused me to Emir Arven of saying bad things, but I only stated that he was defending the Cyrillic scrypt from Serbinization. Why did you interpret it that way? --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 13:13, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
531911 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531909 +++$+++ 531910 +++$+++ 2006-04-13 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.144979100E09 +++$+++ Don't mind it. :) He was only trying to stop the Serbinization of the Cyrillic scrypt in former Yugo. -- +++$+++ ::Don't mind it. :) He was only trying to stop the Serbinization of the Cyrillic scrypt in former Yugo. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 18:45, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

7624 +++$+++ East of Borschov +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7624 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-24 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.282702500E09 +++$+++ It does not look like a Ukrainian COA. It looks one of the towns of the former Ryazan vice-royalty, Russia - see [[:commons:Category:Coats_of_arms_of_cities_and_villages_of_Ryazan_Region]]. The towns of the southern frontier of the former governorate are now not in [[Ryazan Oblast]] but in Lipetsk Oblast, Voronezh Oblast etc. and some were abandoned or downgraded to villages. The upper half (Ryazan ) is easily identifiable, although the sword is curved, not straight as it should be (there are two options for this part - either sword, sheath and hat in upper half, or just the hat in a small escutcheon like [[commons:Category:Coats of arms of districts of Ryazan Region|here]]). Bottom half - which identifies the town - ???  +++$+++ It does not look like a Ukrainian COA. It looks one of the towns of the former Ryazan vice-royalty, Russia - see [[:commons:Category:Coats_of_arms_of_cities_and_villages_of_Ryazan_Region]]. The towns of the southern frontier of the former governorate are now not in [[Ryazan Oblast]] but in Lipetsk Oblast, Voronezh Oblast etc. and some were abandoned or downgraded to villages. The upper half (Ryazan ) is easily identifiable, although the sword is curved, not straight as it should be (there are two options for this part - either sword, sheath and hat in upper half, or just the hat in a small escutcheon like [[commons:Category:Coats of arms of districts of Ryazan Region|here]]). Bottom half - which identifies the town - ??? [[User talk:East of Borschov|East of Borschov]] 19:15, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
7625 +++$+++ East of Borschov +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7624 +++$+++ 7624 +++$+++ 2010-08-24 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.282703400E09 +++$+++ Got it: It's [[Yegoryevsk]], Moscow oblast. Contemporary COA has only the dragon in red field, but the historical COA was topped with the symbols of Ryazan (see here [http:\/\/www.dragon-nest.ru\/def\/herald\/egoriev.jpg].).  +++$+++ * Got it: It's [[Yegoryevsk]], Moscow oblast. Contemporary COA has only the dragon in red field, but the historical COA was topped with the symbols of Ryazan (see here [http://www.dragon-nest.ru/def/herald/egoriev.jpg].). [[User talk:East of Borschov|East of Borschov]] 19:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
7626 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7624 +++$+++ 7624 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.282722540E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much! I have looked for this information for five years! Thank you thank you thank you!-- +++$+++ :Thank you so much! I have looked for this information for five years! Thank you thank you thank you!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 00:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

269769 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-31 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.238565780E09 +++$+++ Every time I look, you've reviewed another hook.  Fantastic work.  And I know you were given a barnstar a few days ago for the same thing, but you deserve it. Warmest wishes,  +++$+++ Every time I look, you've reviewed another hook.  Fantastic work.  And I know you were given a barnstar a few days ago for the same thing, but you deserve it. Warmest wishes, [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 23:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
269770 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269769 +++$+++ 269769 +++$+++ 2009-03-31 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.238566020E09 +++$+++ Thank you so very much! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you so very much! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
269771 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269769 +++$+++ 269770 +++$+++ 2009-03-31 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.238566140E09 +++$+++ Is there a reason why [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Mattisse]] is a redlink?  -- +++$+++ ::Is there a reason why [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mattisse]] is a redlink?  --[[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 23:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
269772 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269769 +++$+++ 269771 +++$+++ 2009-03-31 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.238566620E09 +++$+++ Yes. I am periodically misunderstood pretty severely. I think it is due to my excessively high energy level at times.  Besides, I would not be good at it. I am not a technical person.  Thanks for thinking of me though. &mdash; +++$+++ :::Yes. I am periodically misunderstood pretty severely. I think it is due to my excessively high energy level at times.  Besides, I would not be good at it. I am not a technical person.  Thanks for thinking of me though. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

531914 +++$+++ CrnaGora +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-28 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.146277860E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Flag of Montenegro.svg|25px]]  +++$+++ [[Image:Flag of Montenegro.svg|25px]] [[User:CrnaGora|CrnaGora]] ([[User talk:CrnaGora|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/CrnaGora|Contribs]] | [[Special:Emailuser/CrnaGora|E-mail]]) 19:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
531915 +++$+++ CrnaGora +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531914 +++$+++ 531914 +++$+++ 2006-04-28 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.146278640E09 +++$+++ I agree with you on that. I forgot that Bosnian Serbs actually talk [[Serbian language|Serbian]] and not [[Bosnian language|Bosnian]]. Good point on that, why would Bosnians need to know the Cyrillic script. Only Bosnian Serbs use Cyrillic because they speak Serbian, so why should other Bosnians have to do that. I personally hate the Cyrillic script because of all the letters, it's very tricky to understand. [[Image:Flag of Montenegro.svg|25px]]  +++$+++ :I agree with you on that. I forgot that Bosnian Serbs actually talk [[Serbian language|Serbian]] and not [[Bosnian language|Bosnian]]. Good point on that, why would Bosnians need to know the Cyrillic script. Only Bosnian Serbs use Cyrillic because they speak Serbian, so why should other Bosnians have to do that. I personally hate the Cyrillic script because of all the letters, it's very tricky to understand. [[Image:Flag of Montenegro.svg|25px]] [[User:CrnaGora|CrnaGora]] ([[User talk:CrnaGora|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/CrnaGora|Contribs]] | [[Special:Emailuser/CrnaGora|E-mail]]) 19:44, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

7627 +++$+++ Orionist +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7627 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-25 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.282740540E09 +++$+++ Hello! I've just got a message that the [[:File:3rd_World_Scout_Jamboree.svg]] file I uploaded for your request on the Illustration Workshop has been nominated for speedy deletion. So you might want to use it in an article so that it can be valid as Fair Use, or maybe use a {{tl|hangon}} template and provide a reason. Regards, --  +++$+++ Hello! I've just got a message that the [[:File:3rd_World_Scout_Jamboree.svg]] file I uploaded for your request on the Illustration Workshop has been nominated for speedy deletion. So you might want to use it in an article so that it can be valid as Fair Use, or maybe use a {{tl|hangon}} template and provide a reason. Regards, -- [[User:Orionist|<font color="#0066CC">'''Orionist'''</font>]] ★ [[User talk:Orionist|<font color="#0066CC">talk</font>]] 05:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
7628 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7627 +++$+++ 7627 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.282760220E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I totally didn't see that this was done, I am sorry for the delay.-- +++$+++ :Thank you, I totally didn't see that this was done, I am sorry for the delay.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 11:17, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

531916 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-28 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.146279360E09 +++$+++ The only problem is that there's a little controvesry - ''official'' forming of the Montenegrin people's Language is still in progress, and the pro-independency parties in Montenegro (that choose Montenegrin over Serbian) use the Cyrillic scrypt instead. Like the party of Milo Djukanovich. Although when the Montenegrin language will finally be officialized, there is no controversy over the fact that the Latin scrypt would be the main, the problem is that the Cyrillic scrypt is still the main in usage in the Republic of Montenegro. -- +++$+++ The only problem is that there's a little controvesry - ''official'' forming of the Montenegrin people's Language is still in progress, and the pro-independency parties in Montenegro (that choose Montenegrin over Serbian) use the Cyrillic scrypt instead. Like the party of Milo Djukanovich. Although when the Montenegrin language will finally be officialized, there is no controversy over the fact that the Latin scrypt would be the main, the problem is that the Cyrillic scrypt is still the main in usage in the Republic of Montenegro. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 19:56, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
531917 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531916 +++$+++ 531916 +++$+++ 2006-04-28 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.146280020E09 +++$+++ I ja bih htio da Crna Gora postane svojstvena drzava, ko sto je i bila prije 1918. Nije pitanje da li su Crnogorci Srbi, srpskog porijekla ili nijesu Srbi uopce, no Crnoj Gori je sve krenulo lose od 1920s pa do danas. Prije joj je islo dobro, iako je bila zemlja sa najmanjim brojem stanovnika na svijetu - sto jos uvecava njena cuda. -- +++$+++ : I ja bih htio da Crna Gora postane svojstvena drzava, ko sto je i bila prije 1918. Nije pitanje da li su Crnogorci Srbi, srpskog porijekla ili nijesu Srbi uopce, no Crnoj Gori je sve krenulo lose od 1920s pa do danas. Prije joj je islo dobro, iako je bila zemlja sa najmanjim brojem stanovnika na svijetu - sto jos uvecava njena cuda. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 20:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
531918 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531916 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-28 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.146283560E09 +++$+++ Most of my education I received in [[Montenegro]] and [[Croatia]]. My \"touchy\" :) additude towards the Cyrillic is because I am currently staying in [[Belgrade]]. -- +++$+++ ::: Most of my education I received in [[Montenegro]] and [[Croatia]]. My "touchy" :) additude towards the Cyrillic is because I am currently staying in [[Belgrade]]. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 21:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

269773 +++$+++ Alansohn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-01 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.238578380E09 +++$+++ Please accept my thanks for all of the hard work you've put in on reviewing and approving DYKs. While I and every other editor knows what they were trying to do when creating an article, we can make it hard on reviewers like you to hunt through an article to confirm what is being cited. Please accept my apologies for any crankiness that may be reflected in any recent comments.  +++$+++ Please accept my thanks for all of the hard work you've put in on reviewing and approving DYKs. While I and every other editor knows what they were trying to do when creating an article, we can make it hard on reviewers like you to hunt through an article to confirm what is being cited. Please accept my apologies for any crankiness that may be reflected in any recent comments. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 02:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
269774 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269773 +++$+++ 269773 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.238579280E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much. I used to submit bunches of DYKs back in the days when no one went through them, so I know what it feels like to have a DYK ignored. I understand your side of it. And I appreciate how you jump on the news (including the obits!) like the [[Polycap]] article (which I heard on the news this morning) and you do write good articles quickly. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you very much. I used to submit bunches of DYKs back in the days when no one went through them, so I know what it feels like to have a DYK ignored. I understand your side of it. And I appreciate how you jump on the news (including the obits!) like the [[Polycap]] article (which I heard on the news this morning) and you do write good articles quickly. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

7630 +++$+++ Ukexpat +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7630 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-26 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.282879020E09 +++$+++ I cropped it a little - does it look better now?&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp; +++$+++ I cropped it a little - does it look better now?&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 20:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
7631 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7630 +++$+++ 7630 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.282915140E09 +++$+++ Much, thank you!-- +++$+++ :Much, thank you!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 06:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

269775 +++$+++ Art LaPella +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269775 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-01 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.238631000E09 +++$+++ I reversed \"as\" in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=281084050&oldid=281083313 your edit here] (it will work with or without the 's). [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22as+much+as+a+third%22&btnG=Search \"as much as a third\"] out-Googles [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22as+much+a+third%22&btnG=Search \"as much a third\"]  by 1,960,000 to 164, so perhaps English isn't your native language.  +++$+++ I reversed "as" in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=281084050&oldid=281083313 your edit here] (it will work with or without the 's). [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22as+much+as+a+third%22&btnG=Search "as much as a third"] out-Googles [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22as+much+a+third%22&btnG=Search "as much a third"]  by 1,960,000 to 164, so perhaps English isn't your native language. [[User:Art LaPella|Art LaPella]] ([[User talk:Art LaPella|talk]]) 17:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
269776 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269775 +++$+++ 269775 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.238631360E09 +++$+++ Your edit looks wrong to me, incorrect American English anyway, but you're the boss! \"as much a third\"? I did remove the 's.   Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Your edit looks wrong to me, incorrect American English anyway, but you're the boss! "as much a third"? I did remove the 's.   Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
269777 +++$+++ Art LaPella +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269775 +++$+++ 269776 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.238639400E09 +++$+++ Yes, \"as much a third\" looks wrong to me also; that's why I reverted to \"as much as a third\", which I showed is thousands of times more common.  +++$+++ ::Yes, "as much a third" looks wrong to me also; that's why I reverted to "as much as a third", which I showed is thousands of times more common. [[User:Art LaPella|Art LaPella]] ([[User talk:Art LaPella|talk]]) 19:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
269778 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269775 +++$+++ 269777 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.238639760E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you added that! Almost 100% of the time I can trust my instincts, even if I can't explain why in fancy grammatical terms. British English is a mysterious thing, and my confusion is not help by my partial education in Britain where I was punished by teachers for American English. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::I'm glad you added that! Almost 100% of the time I can trust my instincts, even if I can't explain why in fancy grammatical terms. British English is a mysterious thing, and my confusion is not help by my partial education in Britain where I was punished by teachers for American English. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

7632 +++$+++ Hugahoody +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-26 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.282882560E09 +++$+++ Hello. The file above has been tagged to be uploaded as a PNG but in my opinion any conversion will have little positive effect. What do you think could be done about this and similar files?  +++$+++ Hello. The file above has been tagged to be uploaded as a PNG but in my opinion any conversion will have little positive effect. What do you think could be done about this and similar files? [[User:Hugahoody|Hugahoody]] ([[User talk:Hugahoody|talk]]) 21:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
7633 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7632 +++$+++ 7632 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.282915260E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia supports change to png for lossless compression and so on. I appreciate the hard work you've done thus far!-- +++$+++ :Wikipedia supports change to png for lossless compression and so on. I appreciate the hard work you've done thus far!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 06:21, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
7634 +++$+++ Hugahoody +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7632 +++$+++ 7633 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.282959720E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! I'll upload this and similar photos to PNG. It's just that I can't see where changing it from JPG will achieve much as it's a dated photograph.  +++$+++ ::You're welcome! I'll upload this and similar photos to PNG. It's just that I can't see where changing it from JPG will achieve much as it's a dated photograph. [[User:Hugahoody|Hugahoody]] ([[User talk:Hugahoody|talk]]) 18:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

269779 +++$+++ Haiduc +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269779 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-02 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.238738760E09 +++$+++ I did not think that was a refinement. How were those categories not appropriate?  +++$+++ I did not think that was a refinement. How were those categories not appropriate? [[User:Haiduc|Haiduc]] ([[User talk:Haiduc|talk]]) 23:06, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
269780 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269779 +++$+++ 269779 +++$+++ 2009-04-02 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.238739420E09 +++$+++ What specifically are you referring to? I moves it out of [[:Category:Sexuality and age]]  because the category name is not very descriptive. It has  age related issues in sexuality, and then things like  Child sex abuse,   etc. Is that what you are referring to? It can go back [[:Category:Sexuality and age]]  if you want. Looking at what is left there, it seems to be a mixed bag of deviant behavior. I just thought the category name was too vague. Also, the whole category [[:Category:Human sexuality]] has a big tag on in to encourage a cleaning up of the categories to make them more precise and descriptive. Do you have some good suggestions?  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :What specifically are you referring to? I moves it out of [[:Category:Sexuality and age]]  because the category name is not very descriptive. It has  age related issues in sexuality, and then things like  Child sex abuse,   etc. Is that what you are referring to? It can go back [[:Category:Sexuality and age]]  if you want. Looking at what is left there, it seems to be a mixed bag of deviant behavior. I just thought the category name was too vague. Also, the whole category [[:Category:Human sexuality]] has a big tag on in to encourage a cleaning up of the categories to make them more precise and descriptive. Do you have some good suggestions?  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
269781 +++$+++ Haiduc +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269779 +++$+++ 269780 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.238783880E09 +++$+++ Well, in order of appearance, it is a very intimate relationship, it is a form of sexuality that essentially involves issues of age, and it certainly has been used by a number of cultures as a rite of passage. Removing them makes the cat less precise and descriptive. The ''only'' cat that I am less sure about is one you left, \"sexuality and society.\" Seems like a truism. After all, what sexuality is not related to society?!  +++$+++ ::Well, in order of appearance, it is a very intimate relationship, it is a form of sexuality that essentially involves issues of age, and it certainly has been used by a number of cultures as a rite of passage. Removing them makes the cat less precise and descriptive. The ''only'' cat that I am less sure about is one you left, "sexuality and society." Seems like a truism. After all, what sexuality is not related to society?! [[User:Haiduc|Haiduc]] ([[User talk:Haiduc|talk]]) 11:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
269782 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269779 +++$+++ 269781 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.238788140E09 +++$+++ So you think the whole category [[:Category:Sexuality and society]] should be removed as obvious and unnecessary?  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::So you think the whole category [[:Category:Sexuality and society]] should be removed as obvious and unnecessary?  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

7638 +++$+++ Hydroxonium +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-29 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.283122080E09 +++$+++ I have started a [[Jack Horkheimer]] article per the discussion on the [[Talk:Jack Horkheimer: Star Gazer#Article|Jack Horkheimer: Star Gazer talk page]]. I am cordially inviting you join in adding to the article. Or to just watch over my shoulder and correct my mistakes.  I will be working on the article over the next few days. Thanks for your time -  +++$+++ I have started a [[Jack Horkheimer]] article per the discussion on the [[Talk:Jack Horkheimer: Star Gazer#Article|Jack Horkheimer: Star Gazer talk page]]. I am cordially inviting you join in adding to the article. Or to just watch over my shoulder and correct my mistakes.  I will be working on the article over the next few days. Thanks for your time - [[User:Hydroxonium|Hydroxonium]] ([[User talk:Hydroxonium|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Hydroxonium|contribs]]) 15:48, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
7639 +++$+++ Hydroxonium +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7638 +++$+++ 7638 +++$+++ 2010-09-04 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.283618040E09 +++$+++ I've finished the work on the [[Jack Horkheimer]] artcile that I wanted to do. It'a a good start on the article but it needs copy editing and clean up. If you have some time, could you review the article and make any necessary changes? Thanks very much. -  +++$+++ :I've finished the work on the [[Jack Horkheimer]] artcile that I wanted to do. It'a a good start on the article but it needs copy editing and clean up. If you have some time, could you review the article and make any necessary changes? Thanks very much. - [[User:Hydroxonium|Hydroxonium]] ([[User talk:Hydroxonium|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Hydroxonium|contribs]]) 09:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

7640 +++$+++ DePiep +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-31 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.283282700E09 +++$+++ [[image:Imbox notice.png|40x40px|link=|alt=]]'''Your userpage [[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo\/Archive 6]]''' has a category, and so appears in '''[[:Category:Typography]]'''.<br> As the [[Wikipedia:UP#Categories, templates, and redirects|guideline on userpages]] describes, this is undesired. It is suggested that you edit the userpage to prevent this showing. It can be done by adding a semicolon (''':''') before the word Category, like this: <tt><nowiki>[[:Category:<\/nowiki>Typography<nowiki>]]<\/nowiki><\/tt>.- +++$+++ [[image:Imbox notice.png|40x40px|link=|alt=]]'''Your userpage [[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo/Archive 6]]''' has a category, and so appears in '''[[:Category:Typography]]'''.<br> As the [[Wikipedia:UP#Categories, templates, and redirects|guideline on userpages]] describes, this is undesired. It is suggested that you edit the userpage to prevent this showing. It can be done by adding a semicolon (''':''') before the word Category, like this: <tt><nowiki>[[:Category:</nowiki>Typography<nowiki>]]</nowiki></tt>.-[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 12:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
7641 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7640 +++$+++ 7640 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.283282880E09 +++$+++ I can't find it, if you can fix it, run with it.-- +++$+++ *I can't find it, if you can fix it, run with it.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 12:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
7642 +++$+++ DePiep +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7640 +++$+++ 7641 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.283285760E09 +++$+++ The Talkpage had an emoticon-like thing: <code><nowiki>{{:)|devil}}<\/nowiki><\/code> by [[User talk:Gadget850]] 16:16, 12 November 2009. This thing sort of copiesd the whole page [[Bracket]] into the Talkpage. That introduced the (three) Bracket-categories. Workings are unclear to me. But I made the code ''nowiki'', and now it's solved as far as I could check. {{done}} - +++$+++ ::The Talkpage had an emoticon-like thing: <code><nowiki>{{:)|devil}}</nowiki></code> by [[User talk:Gadget850]] 16:16, 12 November 2009. This thing sort of copiesd the whole page [[Bracket]] into the Talkpage. That introduced the (three) Bracket-categories. Workings are unclear to me. But I made the code ''nowiki'', and now it's solved as far as I could check. {{done}} -[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 13:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

531929 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-09 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.147209360E09 +++$+++ ...raspitah ze sa simbole Hrvata Bosne i Hercegovine, no sve sto sam vidio (i cuo od njih) je ona (izmjenjena) sahovnica Bosne i Hercegovine. (kao na [[Herzeg-Bosnia]], a ne kao na [[Croatia]]). -- +++$+++ ...raspitah ze sa simbole Hrvata Bosne i Hercegovine, no sve sto sam vidio (i cuo od njih) je ona (izmjenjena) sahovnica Bosne i Hercegovine. (kao na [[Herzeg-Bosnia]], a ne kao na [[Croatia]]). --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 14:16, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
531930 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531929 +++$+++ 531929 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.147209660E09 +++$+++ I nisam siguran da li bi bilo dobro Srbe oznaciti crvenom bojom a Hrvate plavom - kroz historiju, (u etnickim kartama se tako vidi), Plavo je oznacavalo Srbe a crveno Hrvate - bas kao sto je Crveno oznacavalo Rimokatolicku crkvu, a plavo Istocno(srpsko)pravoslavnu. Tim sistemom su i isle srpsko-hrvatske zastave - koje su postale uzor jugoslovenskim crvenim-plavim-bijelim. -- +++$+++ :I nisam siguran da li bi bilo dobro Srbe oznaciti crvenom bojom a Hrvate plavom - kroz historiju, (u etnickim kartama se tako vidi), Plavo je oznacavalo Srbe a crveno Hrvate - bas kao sto je Crveno oznacavalo Rimokatolicku crkvu, a plavo Istocno(srpsko)pravoslavnu. Tim sistemom su i isle srpsko-hrvatske zastave - koje su postale uzor jugoslovenskim crvenim-plavim-bijelim. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 14:21, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
531931 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531929 +++$+++ 531930 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.147209840E09 +++$+++ Prva zastava na [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Flags_of_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina#First_Set_of_Proposals First Set of Proposals] nije losa, ali ja bih zamijenio mjesta zelene i plave boje (nekako da ispada da su muslimani u sredi, izmedju). -- +++$+++ :: Prva zastava na [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flags_of_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina#First_Set_of_Proposals First Set of Proposals] nije losa, ali ja bih zamijenio mjesta zelene i plave boje (nekako da ispada da su muslimani u sredi, izmedju). --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 14:24, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

269786 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-05 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.238956080E09 +++$+++ The only good thing to come out of the Lucy wars was that I got to know F&f. The man can [[History of Mysore and Coorg (1565\u20131760)|write]] and is very impressive all round; he has been a ''huge'' help to us, both in encouraging myself, Liz and Modernist, and in helping us out with prose. In the Lucy process, I fell out with Ottava, which frankly pains me, but maybe the damage is not fatal. Whatever, thanks for your kind note, and to let you know again I hope to work with you at some stage - I have already said to you that I actively seek out sharp and skilled reviewers who are unafraid to tear articles apart. Its a nice irony that well constructed oppose votes actually benifit an article more than light weight or drive by supports.  +++$+++ The only good thing to come out of the Lucy wars was that I got to know F&f. The man can [[History of Mysore and Coorg (1565–1760)|write]] and is very impressive all round; he has been a ''huge'' help to us, both in encouraging myself, Liz and Modernist, and in helping us out with prose. In the Lucy process, I fell out with Ottava, which frankly pains me, but maybe the damage is not fatal. Whatever, thanks for your kind note, and to let you know again I hope to work with you at some stage - I have already said to you that I actively seek out sharp and skilled reviewers who are unafraid to tear articles apart. Its a nice irony that well constructed oppose votes actually benifit an article more than light weight or drive by supports. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 11:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
269787 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269786 +++$+++ 269786 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.239001380E09 +++$+++ F&F was the only editor who was willing to helped me prevent a POV article from passing FAC. To oppose was unpopular,  but through the power of his intellect in expressing his opposes and his superb marshaling of evidence, we were able to succeed. I appreciate that he is willing to stick his neck out for what is right. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :F&F was the only editor who was willing to helped me prevent a POV article from passing FAC. To oppose was unpopular,  but through the power of his intellect in expressing his opposes and his superb marshaling of evidence, we were able to succeed. I appreciate that he is willing to stick his neck out for what is right. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

7643 +++$+++  +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-01 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.283356800E09 +++$+++ I have completed the requests you made in the Graphics Lab. Really sorry about it being late. I had some exams and was a lil' busy! [[:en:User:Finemann|<b><FONT COLOR=\"#007CFF\"><i>F\u03b9\u03b7\u03b5m\u03b1\u03b7\u03b7<\/i><\/FONT><\/b>]] [[:en:User_talk:Finemann|<sup><FONT COLOR=\"#616D7E\"><i>(talk)<\/i><\/FONT><\/sup>]] 09:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ I have completed the requests you made in the Graphics Lab. Really sorry about it being late. I had some exams and was a lil' busy! [[:en:User:Finemann|<b><FONT COLOR="#007CFF"><i>Fιηεmαηη</i></FONT></b>]] [[:en:User_talk:Finemann|<sup><FONT COLOR="#616D7E"><i>(talk)</i></FONT></sup>]] 09:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
7644 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7643 +++$+++ 7643 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.283364900E09 +++$+++ No problem, I really appreciate your help and the great work you do!-- +++$+++ :No problem, I really appreciate your help and the great work you do!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 11:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

269788 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-27 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.238213700E09 +++$+++ There is an oppose on the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/Murray_Chotiner Chotiner FAC] that I've not seen before, an oppose because the image in the infobox is fair use, and that it (according to the objector) should be possible to get a FedGov copyright photo of Chotiner (how, he doesn't explain).  I've responded, but I'd be very glad for your advice on how to deal with this.-- +++$+++ There is an oppose on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Murray_Chotiner Chotiner FAC] that I've not seen before, an oppose because the image in the infobox is fair use, and that it (according to the objector) should be possible to get a FedGov copyright photo of Chotiner (how, he doesn't explain).  I've responded, but I'd be very glad for your advice on how to deal with this.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:15, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
269789 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ 2009-03-27 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.238215140E09 +++$+++ I have seen that done rather frequently lately, but I have never seen it hold up an article from passing. Some resolution can surely be attained.  You could put a bang up fair use rational there. How the picture shows information in the article that simply cannot be explained through words. [[User:Rjanag]] is going through a similar '''Oppose''' at [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Street_newspaper|FAC Street newspaper]] with an editor who is challenging his use of newspaper pics. The editor is refusing to accept his justifications. At worst, you could remove the pic, as it is not required for an FA to have a picture.  I believe it all lies in having a complete fair use rationale. Why is the editor objecting so sure there must be a free image around? I will try to think of ideas.   &mdash; +++$+++ :I have seen that done rather frequently lately, but I have never seen it hold up an article from passing. Some resolution can surely be attained.  You could put a bang up fair use rational there. How the picture shows information in the article that simply cannot be explained through words. [[User:Rjanag]] is going through a similar '''Oppose''' at [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Street_newspaper|FAC Street newspaper]] with an editor who is challenging his use of newspaper pics. The editor is refusing to accept his justifications. At worst, you could remove the pic, as it is not required for an FA to have a picture.  I believe it all lies in having a complete fair use rationale. Why is the editor objecting so sure there must be a free image around? I will try to think of ideas.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
269790 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ 269789 +++$+++ 2009-03-27 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.238215500E09 +++$+++ I don't think he has read the article, and realized that Chotiner was in a Federal position for only two years.  The rest of the time he was a backroom guy, an electon geek.  Chotiner did not make himself very public, especially in his final years.-- +++$+++ ::I don't think he has read the article, and realized that Chotiner was in a Federal position for only two years.  The rest of the time he was a backroom guy, an electon geek.  Chotiner did not make himself very public, especially in his final years.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:45, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
269791 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ 269790 +++$+++ 2009-03-27 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.238215980E09 +++$+++ You have to say that there is no free use photo available, that your use of it will not infringe on the copyright owner's commercial opportunities, that you are using a low resolution version of the photo, that it meets [[Wikipedia: Image policy]], etc. Everything it says at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria]]. There is a nice little form somewhere that you can use. Perhaps I can find it on a current picture and copy it.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::You have to say that there is no free use photo available, that your use of it will not infringe on the copyright owner's commercial opportunities, that you are using a low resolution version of the photo, that it meets [[Wikipedia: Image policy]], etc. Everything it says at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria]]. There is a nice little form somewhere that you can use. Perhaps I can find it on a current picture and copy it.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
269792 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ 269791 +++$+++ 2009-03-27 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.238216100E09 +++$+++ Thanks, if you would, I'd be grateful.  I'm going to point out that there are no free use photos on WP of the three other men who served as White House Counsel with Chotiner, though only two have articles.-- +++$+++ ::::Thanks, if you would, I'd be grateful.  I'm going to point out that there are no free use photos on WP of the three other men who served as White House Counsel with Chotiner, though only two have articles.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:55, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
269793 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ 269792 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.238790060E09 +++$+++ I'm gong to try to take care of the specific concerns Tony addresses in his comments in the Chotiner FAC in the next few hours.  Do you think you could run through the article and give it a once-over as he suggests?  I don't think he wants anything really deep, and is generally satisfied, just a fresh set of eyes.  Thanks.-- +++$+++ :::::I'm gong to try to take care of the specific concerns Tony addresses in his comments in the Chotiner FAC in the next few hours.  Do you think you could run through the article and give it a once-over as he suggests?  I don't think he wants anything really deep, and is generally satisfied, just a fresh set of eyes.  Thanks.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 13:21, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
269794 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ 269793 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.238792280E09 +++$+++ Yes, after you are done. If you can make the wording as specific as possible, that will help. Many of his concerns I wondered about also.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::Yes, after you are done. If you can make the wording as specific as possible, that will help. Many of his concerns I wondered about also.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:58, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
269795 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ 269794 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.238793180E09 +++$+++ I'm done.  But a lot of it was due to Brian's complaint I was using the name \"Chotiner\" too often.  Damned if you do, damned if you don't.  Thanks for your help.-- +++$+++ :::::::I'm done.  But a lot of it was due to Brian's complaint I was using the name "Chotiner" too often.  Damned if you do, damned if you don't.  Thanks for your help.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 14:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
269796 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ 269795 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.239163920E09 +++$+++ It passed!  And I even spent an hour and a half at the National Archives this afternoon, hoping they'd have a free use photo of him, which they didn't.  Thanks so much for your help.  Woot!-- +++$+++ ::::::::It passed!  And I even spent an hour and a half at the National Archives this afternoon, hoping they'd have a free use photo of him, which they didn't.  Thanks so much for your help.  Woot!--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:12, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269797 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ 269796 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.239164160E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome! I am so glad (although I knew it would!) It is good for your moral fiber to spend time in the National Archives, but why is this guy so obscure? He is not even mentioned in Nixon's Wikipedia biograpy. Maybe you should insert him.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::You are very welcome! I am so glad (although I knew it would!) It is good for your moral fiber to spend time in the National Archives, but why is this guy so obscure? He is not even mentioned in Nixon's Wikipedia biograpy. Maybe you should insert him.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269798 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ 269797 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.239164580E09 +++$+++ His philosophy was that a good campaign manager should neither be seen nor heard.  The National Archives is an immensely great place to visit.  Just so much there!  I mostly spent time in the image room, now that I have a researcher card (anyone can get one), plan on going back.-- +++$+++ ::::::::::His philosophy was that a good campaign manager should neither be seen nor heard.  The National Archives is an immensely great place to visit.  Just so much there!  I mostly spent time in the image room, now that I have a researcher card (anyone can get one), plan on going back.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269799 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269788 +++$+++ 269798 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.239164940E09 +++$+++ Chotiner certainly succeeded in implementing his philosophy then. So you were right about there being no existing official photograph. Well, who is next?  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::::Chotiner certainly succeeded in implementing his philosophy then. So you were right about there being no existing official photograph. Well, who is next?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

394490 +++$+++ Remember the dot +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-07 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.168177740E09 +++$+++ Hi. I noticed that you've converted a few images including [[:Image:04 Jan 2003 (12).jpg]] and [[:Image:04 Jan 2003 (11).jpg]] to the [[PNG]] format instead of the JPEG format. These images have already lost resolution by being in the [[JPEG]] format. Putting them into the PNG format doesn't improve the quality; all it does is increase the file size. Could you please explain on my talk page why you have done this? -- +++$+++ Hi. I noticed that you've converted a few images including [[:Image:04 Jan 2003 (12).jpg]] and [[:Image:04 Jan 2003 (11).jpg]] to the [[PNG]] format instead of the JPEG format. These images have already lost resolution by being in the [[JPEG]] format. Putting them into the PNG format doesn't improve the quality; all it does is increase the file size. Could you please explain on my talk page why you have done this? --[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] 05:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
394491 +++$+++ Anthony5429 +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394490 +++$+++ 394490 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.168268160E09 +++$+++ Please see my response on your talk page. -- +++$+++ :Please see my response on your talk page. --[[User:Anthony5429|Anthony5429]] 06:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

531935 +++$+++ Bormalagurski +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-11 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.147341060E09 +++$+++ U principu ne treba ni\u0161ta brisati, ali mo\u017ee\u0161 arhivirati stranicu, ili prebaciti ovu poruku u User:Kseferovic\/insults, pa ne napraviti ni jedan link ka toj stranici, tako ja re\u0161avam ove probleme ;-)  -- +++$+++ U principu ne treba ništa brisati, ali možeš arhivirati stranicu, ili prebaciti ovu poruku u User:Kseferovic/insults, pa ne napraviti ni jedan link ka toj stranici, tako ja rešavam ove probleme ;-)  --[[User:Bormalagurski|<font color="#003399">'''serbiana'''</font>]] [[Yugoslavia|'''-''']] [[User_talk:Bormalagurski|<font color="#A61022">'''talk'''</font>]] 02:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
531936 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531935 +++$+++ 531935 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.147408560E09 +++$+++ Nadam se da sam pomogao; pozdrav! -- +++$+++ :Nadam se da sam pomogao; pozdrav! --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 21:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

7649 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-11 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.284244080E09 +++$+++ Can I ask why you think this is the work of the UK Government? I may be wrong, but I strongly doubt there were UK Government photographers at the [[Tripartite Pact]]. The fact the IWM has a copy of the photo (or even the original) does not mean they own the copyright.  +++$+++ Can I ask why you think this is the work of the UK Government? I may be wrong, but I strongly doubt there were UK Government photographers at the [[Tripartite Pact]]. The fact the IWM has a copy of the photo (or even the original) does not mean they own the copyright. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 15:28, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
7650 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7649 +++$+++ 7649 +++$+++ 2010-09-11 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.284244380E09 +++$+++ It's got \"Imperial War Museum\" stamped on it, all others I have seen on Commons (and had removed as watermarking) are tagged thus. I don't know why they do that, maybe they had observers or spies? But they seem to have laid claim to the thing.-- +++$+++ :It's got "Imperial War Museum" stamped on it, all others I have seen on Commons (and had removed as watermarking) are tagged thus. I don't know why they do that, maybe they had observers or spies? But they seem to have laid claim to the thing.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 15:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
7651 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7649 +++$+++ 7650 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.285107540E09 +++$+++ They may owe the original, they may own a copy, I don't know. Doesn't mean they own the rights; I'm gonna remove the PD notice (and, for what it's worth, having both a PD and a non-free notice is rather bad form).  +++$+++ ::They may owe the original, they may own a copy, I don't know. Doesn't mean they own the rights; I'm gonna remove the PD notice (and, for what it's worth, having both a PD and a non-free notice is rather bad form). [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 15:19, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

7653 +++$+++ VMS Mosaic +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-15 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.284551700E09 +++$+++ Forgive me if I'm missing an earlier issue with this editor, but I just went thru an unpleasant interaction with an IP (who had to be blocked) on this article.  I see where your first action was a rollback, whereas I understand it can be a close call as to whether to use rollback or undo, perhaps undo might have resulted in the editor taking less offense since his edit would not have been labeled as vandalism.   +++$+++ Forgive me if I'm missing an earlier issue with this editor, but I just went thru an unpleasant interaction with an IP (who had to be blocked) on this article.  I see where your first action was a rollback, whereas I understand it can be a close call as to whether to use rollback or undo, perhaps undo might have resulted in the editor taking less offense since his edit would not have been labeled as vandalism.  [[User:VMS Mosaic|VMS Mosaic]] ([[User talk:VMS Mosaic|talk]]) 04:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
7654 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7653 +++$+++ 7653 +++$+++ 2010-09-15 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.284552900E09 +++$+++ Understood, but the IP came loaded for bear in their edit summaries, they were looking for a fight by the time I saw them this morning. Rolling back a miscapped and contentious editor who favors misspelled screeds makes sense to me.-- +++$+++ :Understood, but the IP came loaded for bear in their edit summaries, they were looking for a fight by the time I saw them this morning. Rolling back a miscapped and contentious editor who favors misspelled screeds makes sense to me.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 05:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

7655 +++$+++ Stepshep +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-22 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.285221360E09 +++$+++ Hi Chris, I'm not very familiar with what the scouting project considers notable enough to be on Wikipedia and was hoping you could take a look at [[SFVS - Slieve Foy Venture Scouts]] if you have a free moment. It would be much appreciated. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Chris, I'm not very familiar with what the scouting project considers notable enough to be on Wikipedia and was hoping you could take a look at [[SFVS - Slieve Foy Venture Scouts]] if you have a free moment. It would be much appreciated. Thanks, [[User:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Calibri;color:#006600;">'''Shep'''</span>]][[User talk:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Helvetica;color:#006600;"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 22:56, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
7656 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7655 +++$+++ 7655 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.285227060E09 +++$+++ Thanks, the Powers That Be are quick this morning!-- +++$+++ :Thanks, the Powers That Be are quick this morning!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 00:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
7657 +++$+++ Stepshep +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7655 +++$+++ 7656 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.285293000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help,  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the help, [[User:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Calibri;color:#C83232;">'''Shep'''</span>]][[User talk:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Helvetica;color:#C83232;"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 18:50, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
7658 +++$+++ Sadads +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7655 +++$+++ 7655 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.285230480E09 +++$+++ Also, [[Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab\/Photography_workshop#Falun_Gong]],  +++$+++ :Also, [[Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab/Photography_workshop#Falun_Gong]], [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 01:28, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

269800 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269800 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-07 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.239165060E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269801 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269800 +++$+++ 269800 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.239165480E09 +++$+++ Humm. That is interesting. Supports your theory that 1. he did exist, and 2. he was definitely behind the scenes. &mdash; +++$+++ :Humm. That is interesting. Supports your theory that 1. he did exist, and 2. he was definitely behind the scenes. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:38, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269802 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269800 +++$+++ 269801 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.239165840E09 +++$+++ I may scan that memo, the typewritten portion is only about 3 inches square and use it for the TFA blurb photo when the time comes.  The other memo they gave me is dated 1969, it is Chotiner to Ehrlichman and Dent, announcing he has been able to secure the minutes of the last ''Democratic'' National Committee executive meeting, thanks to \"operator 41\".  Except, Chotiner reports, page five is missing and 41 is out of town.  He is something else!-- +++$+++ ::I may scan that memo, the typewritten portion is only about 3 inches square and use it for the TFA blurb photo when the time comes.  The other memo they gave me is dated 1969, it is Chotiner to Ehrlichman and Dent, announcing he has been able to secure the minutes of the last ''Democratic'' National Committee executive meeting, thanks to "operator 41".  Except, Chotiner reports, page five is missing and 41 is out of town.  He is something else!--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269803 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269800 +++$+++ 269802 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.239166020E09 +++$+++ It must be strange to come across some real from this man with whom you have been preoccupied for so long. Even I fee strange about it. A verification.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::It must be strange to come across some real from this man with whom you have been preoccupied for so long. Even I fee strange about it. A verification.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269804 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269800 +++$+++ 269803 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.239169260E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, I'm not gonna haunt his grave, bringing flowers.  I find it freaky when the guy at the archives knew who I was talking about.  Most people are \"Murray Who?\"  I think using a cropped image of the Cash memo, including the words \"neutralize Johnny Cash\" and the signature, will work as a TFA blurb photo.-- +++$+++ ::::Don't worry, I'm not gonna haunt his grave, bringing flowers.  I find it freaky when the guy at the archives knew who I was talking about.  Most people are "Murray Who?"  I think using a cropped image of the Cash memo, including the words "neutralize Johnny Cash" and the signature, will work as a TFA blurb photo.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 22:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269805 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269800 +++$+++ 269804 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.239169680E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I don't think of you as the bring flowers type. That scanned image would be great for the TFA. It brings the reality home that your article is describing a real guy who acted in the way you describe. (You could look up his descendants, interview what is left of his four wives - no need to stop now!) &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Yeah, I don't think of you as the bring flowers type. That scanned image would be great for the TFA. It brings the reality home that your article is describing a real guy who acted in the way you describe. (You could look up his descendants, interview what is left of his four wives - no need to stop now!) &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269806 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269800 +++$+++ 269804 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.239169920E09 +++$+++ Sorry, too late.  I started work on expanding [[Checkers speech]] last night, though it is far from done.-- +++$+++ :::::Sorry, too late.  I started work on expanding [[Checkers speech]] last night, though it is far from done.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 22:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269807 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269800 +++$+++ 269806 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.239170040E09 +++$+++ Are you going to go for FAC on that?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::Are you going to go for FAC on that?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269808 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269800 +++$+++ 269807 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.239170340E09 +++$+++ Ha ha, not quite yet.  In a while.  Images are going to be a pain on that one, but I think I can justify fair use screencaps.  But it is going to be a pain figuring out how to deal with the speech itself.  I'm always thinking about FAC on any serious article (not just a DYK throwaway).-- +++$+++ :::::::Ha ha, not quite yet.  In a while.  Images are going to be a pain on that one, but I think I can justify fair use screencaps.  But it is going to be a pain figuring out how to deal with the speech itself.  I'm always thinking about FAC on any serious article (not just a DYK throwaway).--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 22:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269809 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269800 +++$+++ 269808 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.239171240E09 +++$+++ Couldn't you get a TV shot of Nixon's mug giving the speech? I suppose there would be copy right issues. How about a pix of a good Republican cloth coat? &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::Couldn't you get a TV shot of Nixon's mug giving the speech? I suppose there would be copy right issues. How about a pix of a good Republican cloth coat? &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:14, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269810 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269800 +++$+++ 269809 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.239172140E09 +++$+++ The problem is that it would be hard to verify that the coat was Republican and the RNC apparently holds the copyright on the broadcast ... cross that when we come to it.  My proposed blurb and image for Chotiner TFA is in [[User:Wehwalt\/Sandbox]].-- +++$+++ :::::::::The problem is that it would be hard to verify that the coat was Republican and the RNC apparently holds the copyright on the broadcast ... cross that when we come to it.  My proposed blurb and image for Chotiner TFA is in [[User:Wehwalt/Sandbox]].--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 23:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

263420 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-03 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.146708060E09 +++$+++ Not only are you a great contributor, but you are now an admin. Ever since I became an admin, I've gotten to busy with admining and programming javascript to do much major article work; I mainly just protect and monitor the articles we have. I thinks its time to get back into regular editing. Don't forget, editing is fun! Not to infect you with editcountities, but your last 5000 edits were pretty solid. ''' +++$+++ Not only are you a great contributor, but you are now an admin. Ever since I became an admin, I've gotten to busy with admining and programming javascript to do much major article work; I mainly just protect and monitor the articles we have. I thinks its time to get back into regular editing. Don't forget, editing is fun! Not to infect you with editcountities, but your last 5000 edits were pretty solid. '''[[User:Voice of All|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue">-of-</font><font color="black">All</font>]]'''<sup>[[user_talk:Voice_of_All|<font color="blue">T</font>]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Voice of All|@]]|[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="darkgreen">ESP]]</font></sup> 19:01, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
263421 +++$+++ Tim! +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263420 +++$+++ 263420 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.146712380E09 +++$+++ Congrats. The only appropriate quote I can think of is \"I love it when a plan comes together\" even though thats US tv rather than UK. Good luck.  +++$+++ :Congrats. The only appropriate quote I can think of is "I love it when a plan comes together" even though thats US tv rather than UK. Good luck. [[User:Tim!|Tim!]] 20:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

7659 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-26 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.285524480E09 +++$+++ I regret to inform you that you have been blocked for 24 hours because of your edit warring at [[Japanese place names]]. Since you've been here a while, I imagine you know all my usual spiel about consensus, dispute resolution and appealing blocks, so I won't repeat it here.  +++$+++ I regret to inform you that you have been blocked for 24 hours because of your edit warring at [[Japanese place names]]. Since you've been here a while, I imagine you know all my usual spiel about consensus, dispute resolution and appealing blocks, so I won't repeat it here. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 11:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
7660 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.285594920E09 +++$+++ Yeah, and thanks for taking the side of the deletionists. I was the one who brought the edit war and improper behavior to your attention. Meh. That's why this place is going down the toilet.-- +++$+++ :Yeah, and thanks for taking the side of the deletionists. I was the one who brought the edit war and improper behavior to your attention. Meh. That's why this place is going down the toilet.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 06:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
7661 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ 7660 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.285596120E09 +++$+++ Your accusations are hollow. I blocked the anon for exactly the same amount of time as I blocked you. I've taken no sides here except the one against edit warring.  +++$+++ ::Your accusations are hollow. I blocked the anon for exactly the same amount of time as I blocked you. I've taken no sides here except the one against edit warring. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 07:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
7662 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.285599660E09 +++$+++ Didn't know blocks were all around, for that at least I thank you. Still it's improper to remove images during a deletion discussion, trying to shoehorn the answer they wanted by forcing POV changes here. That should have been considered-contentious editors brought the fight over from Commons, I didn't, I was fighting bad removals. Anyway how much time is left on this turkey? I don't want to jump the gun and get in more trouble than I already don't need.-- +++$+++ :Didn't know blocks were all around, for that at least I thank you. Still it's improper to remove images during a deletion discussion, trying to shoehorn the answer they wanted by forcing POV changes here. That should have been considered-contentious editors brought the fight over from Commons, I didn't, I was fighting bad removals. Anyway how much time is left on this turkey? I don't want to jump the gun and get in more trouble than I already don't need.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 08:01, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
7663 +++$+++ John Vandenberg +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ 7662 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.285601100E09 +++$+++ Your block is for 24 hours.  In a future situation like this, after you have reverted twice, notify the administrators noticeboard, and then leave it be.  If you understand that edit warring about that image isn't the best way to deal with this type of situation, and wont re-instate that image again, you can be unblocked now. <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ ::Your block is for 24 hours.  In a future situation like this, after you have reverted twice, notify the administrators noticeboard, and then leave it be.  If you understand that edit warring about that image isn't the best way to deal with this type of situation, and wont re-instate that image again, you can be unblocked now. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 08:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
7664 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.285601280E09 +++$+++ Agreed, sounds good, let's shake on it! That seems a better way to cover myself.-- +++$+++ :Agreed, sounds good, let's shake on it! That seems a better way to cover myself.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 08:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
7665 +++$+++ John Vandenberg +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ 7664 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.285601640E09 +++$+++ I've unblocked you.  Have a good evening, <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ :: I've unblocked you.  Have a good evening, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 08:34, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
7666 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 08:37:00 +++$+++ 1.285601820E09 +++$+++ You too, and thank you for the good faith. The pink box is still showing up.-- +++$+++ :You too, and thank you for the good faith. The pink box is still showing up.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 08:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
7667 +++$+++ John Vandenberg +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7659 +++$+++ 7666 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 08:48:00 +++$+++ 1.285602480E09 +++$+++ Should be fixed now. <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ :: Should be fixed now. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 08:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

531949 +++$+++ Bormalagurski +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-18 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.147947420E09 +++$+++ Bojim se da gre\u0161i\u0161, prijatelju. Samo Albanci smatraju Kosovo odvojeno od Srbije i to samo u 20. veku. Pre Drugog svetskog rata, Srbi su \u010dinili ve\u0107inu u Kosovu, ali s obzirom da je Albanija bila na strani Nemaca, Srbi su proterani sa Kosova. Posle rata, Tito je odlu\u010dio da ne otera Albance sa Kosova, ve\u0107 je promovisao svoju ideju Bratsva i jedinstva na taj na\u010din. Albanci su od po\u010detka tra\u017eili nezavisnost i pripajanje matici Albaniji. Evo, molim te, pro\u010ditaj [http:\/\/sr.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0 ovaj \u010dlanak]. Slede\u0107i put malo prou\u010di istoriju pre pravljenja la\u017enih konstatacija, hvala. -- +++$+++ Bojim se da grešiš, prijatelju. Samo Albanci smatraju Kosovo odvojeno od Srbije i to samo u 20. veku. Pre Drugog svetskog rata, Srbi su činili većinu u Kosovu, ali s obzirom da je Albanija bila na strani Nemaca, Srbi su proterani sa Kosova. Posle rata, Tito je odlučio da ne otera Albance sa Kosova, već je promovisao svoju ideju Bratsva i jedinstva na taj način. Albanci su od početka tražili nezavisnost i pripajanje matici Albaniji. Evo, molim te, pročitaj [http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0 ovaj članak]. Sledeći put malo prouči istoriju pre pravljenja lažnih konstatacija, hvala. --[[User:Bormalagurski|<font color="#003399">'''serbiana'''</font>]] [[Yugoslavia|'''-''']] [[User_talk:Bormalagurski|<font color="#A61022">'''talk'''</font>]] 03:17, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
531950 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531949 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-18 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.147969800E09 +++$+++ Borise, Kosovo was separated from Albania as a region even during the  Ottoman Empire, and was treated as separate, if you look at it like that. And eversince Albanians fought to change that, as it was imposed by Ottomans. The clanak you are referring to, isn't it written by Serbian editors? how reliable a source is that? Furthermore, I do not think you should dislike someone because they recognize what most of the international community has: that after all this that happened in Kosovo, there is no alternative to the independence of Kosovo. Pozdrav,  +++$+++ :::Borise, Kosovo was separated from Albania as a region even during the  Ottoman Empire, and was treated as separate, if you look at it like that. And eversince Albanians fought to change that, as it was imposed by Ottomans. The clanak you are referring to, isn't it written by Serbian editors? how reliable a source is that? Furthermore, I do not think you should dislike someone because they recognize what most of the international community has: that after all this that happened in Kosovo, there is no alternative to the independence of Kosovo. Pozdrav, [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 09:30, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

531952 +++$+++ Bormalagurski +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-18 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.148016120E09 +++$+++ Dakle, stvar nije toliko jednostavna, kao \"Kosovo je na\u0161e\" ili \"Ne, Kosovo nije va\u0161e, na\u0161e je\". Stvar je u tome da je Kosovo sada deo Srbije, Srbi nisu prvi po\u010deli haose i napade, Albanci su ti koji su se hteli odvojiti, iako su imali \u0161iroku autonomiju, svoju vlast, svog predsednika, kao republika. To im nije bilo dovoljno, pa su \u010dim je Tito umro, jo\u0161 1981. godine, organizovali pobunu. U su\u0161tini, ko je prvi bio na Kosovu, ili \u010dije je Kosovo bilo du\u017ee, nije ni toliko bitno. Bitno je da su Albanci hteli da se odvoje, Srbi im nisu dali, do\u0161lo je do krvi. \u0160ta \u0107e sada biti, sam Bog zna, ali imaj u vidu da RATA NE BI BILO DA ALBANCI NISU HTELI DA SE ODVOJE. Thats the simple part. -- +++$+++ Dakle, stvar nije toliko jednostavna, kao "Kosovo je naše" ili "Ne, Kosovo nije vaše, naše je". Stvar je u tome da je Kosovo sada deo Srbije, Srbi nisu prvi počeli haose i napade, Albanci su ti koji su se hteli odvojiti, iako su imali široku autonomiju, svoju vlast, svog predsednika, kao republika. To im nije bilo dovoljno, pa su čim je Tito umro, još 1981. godine, organizovali pobunu. U suštini, ko je prvi bio na Kosovu, ili čije je Kosovo bilo duže, nije ni toliko bitno. Bitno je da su Albanci hteli da se odvoje, Srbi im nisu dali, došlo je do krvi. Šta će sada biti, sam Bog zna, ali imaj u vidu da RATA NE BI BILO DA ALBANCI NISU HTELI DA SE ODVOJE. Thats the simple part. --[[User:Bormalagurski|<font color="#003399">'''serbiana'''</font>]] [[Yugoslavia|'''-''']] [[User_talk:Bormalagurski|<font color="#A61022">'''talk'''</font>]] 22:22, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
531953 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531952 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.148022840E09 +++$+++ But let us not get that far. My only argument to \"nase\" or \"vase\" referring to Kosovo is: Kosovo belongs to those who live in it. Those who do not will move, just like I moved from one city to another in Kosovo itself, or lived abroad for some time. The free will of people should be respected. I agree with your statement, that history is manipulated with. Thus, I do not believe in history at all.  +++$+++ :::But let us not get that far. My only argument to "nase" or "vase" referring to Kosovo is: Kosovo belongs to those who live in it. Those who do not will move, just like I moved from one city to another in Kosovo itself, or lived abroad for some time. The free will of people should be respected. I agree with your statement, that history is manipulated with. Thus, I do not believe in history at all. [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 00:14, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
531954 +++$+++ Bormalagurski +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531952 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.148024700E09 +++$+++ Sorry Ilir, the first part is a complete lie. In 1981. when the first rebelion took place, Slobodan Milosevic was an unknown banker working who knows where. Why should Kosovo had been a republic? What was so disgusting about living with Serbs? Were you really opressed? Or was it something else... Kosovo had its own government, police, president. It had a vote in SFRY, it could vote against Serbia. The stuff that happened when Slobodan came to power is a pity, but it had to happen. And I'm sad that it did happen. But if Kosovo was a republic inside of SFRY, you guys would've separated a long time ago - you're not slavic, and the country's name was Yugo'''slavia'''. Peacefull resistance? Haha, well of course, Tito didn't allow anyone to say a word against him, let alone organizing protests or terrorist organizations! And guess what, the moment he died, the peacefull protests ended and violence started, what a coincidence. You guys must have waited for that for a long time... So what if not everything was in Albanian? You still spoke Albanian, I'm sure you could buy books in Albanian... Thats how it is when you're an ethnic minority, and the Albanians were an ethnic minority. But no, you wanted your own country where you could be a majority, too bad you didn't already have that. Oh, wait, yes you did, I think its called Albania, or something like that. Well, Albania was too little I guess, and Kosovo ain't big enough for the both of us. Whatever happened in the last 15 years is horrible, but is a result of the Albanian separatist movement. The only reason Slobodan Milosevic came to power, were the '''Albanians'''. You guys helped him to get power, and by boycotting elections, you helped him to stay in power. So, who is to blame? Nationalist Slobodan Milosevic, who was only hungry for power, and didn't care about people's lives? Sure! But why did he come to power? What was the issue that made Serbs go \"Slobo! Slobo! Slobo!\"? Kosovo! Albanians in Kosovo! Not because Serbs didn't like them or anything like that, because you wanted separation. Free will? Were you in jails (I'm talking about pre-Milosevic)? Were you slaves to wealthy Serb sugar cane plantation owners? I don't think so, I think the Albanians had just as much rights as Serbs, Croats, Bosniaks, and all the other people in Yugoslavia. But you wanted more. Well, you're gonna get it, but at what cost? -- +++$+++ ::Sorry Ilir, the first part is a complete lie. In 1981. when the first rebelion took place, Slobodan Milosevic was an unknown banker working who knows where. Why should Kosovo had been a republic? What was so disgusting about living with Serbs? Were you really opressed? Or was it something else... Kosovo had its own government, police, president. It had a vote in SFRY, it could vote against Serbia. The stuff that happened when Slobodan came to power is a pity, but it had to happen. And I'm sad that it did happen. But if Kosovo was a republic inside of SFRY, you guys would've separated a long time ago - you're not slavic, and the country's name was Yugo'''slavia'''. Peacefull resistance? Haha, well of course, Tito didn't allow anyone to say a word against him, let alone organizing protests or terrorist organizations! And guess what, the moment he died, the peacefull protests ended and violence started, what a coincidence. You guys must have waited for that for a long time... So what if not everything was in Albanian? You still spoke Albanian, I'm sure you could buy books in Albanian... Thats how it is when you're an ethnic minority, and the Albanians were an ethnic minority. But no, you wanted your own country where you could be a majority, too bad you didn't already have that. Oh, wait, yes you did, I think its called Albania, or something like that. Well, Albania was too little I guess, and Kosovo ain't big enough for the both of us. Whatever happened in the last 15 years is horrible, but is a result of the Albanian separatist movement. The only reason Slobodan Milosevic came to power, were the '''Albanians'''. You guys helped him to get power, and by boycotting elections, you helped him to stay in power. So, who is to blame? Nationalist Slobodan Milosevic, who was only hungry for power, and didn't care about people's lives? Sure! But why did he come to power? What was the issue that made Serbs go "Slobo! Slobo! Slobo!"? Kosovo! Albanians in Kosovo! Not because Serbs didn't like them or anything like that, because you wanted separation. Free will? Were you in jails (I'm talking about pre-Milosevic)? Were you slaves to wealthy Serb sugar cane plantation owners? I don't think so, I think the Albanians had just as much rights as Serbs, Croats, Bosniaks, and all the other people in Yugoslavia. But you wanted more. Well, you're gonna get it, but at what cost? --[[User:Bormalagurski|<font color="#003399">'''serbiana'''</font>]] [[Yugoslavia|'''-''']] [[User_talk:Bormalagurski|<font color="#A61022">'''talk'''</font>]] 00:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
531955 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531952 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.148025420E09 +++$+++ I am afraid I do not have much time to answer to so many unclear questions in your head, Boris. You obviously are not informed well. I will answer to you in my personal page, no need to both Kseferovic here. Calling someone a liar is not good, Boris. You rushed in your judgement and misinterpretation of what I said.  +++$+++ ::I am afraid I do not have much time to answer to so many unclear questions in your head, Boris. You obviously are not informed well. I will answer to you in my personal page, no need to both Kseferovic here. Calling someone a liar is not good, Boris. You rushed in your judgement and misinterpretation of what I said. [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 00:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
531956 +++$+++ Bormalagurski +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531952 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.148027160E09 +++$+++ I'm sad that you don't want to continue this conversation here, maybe you don't want Kseferovic to actually learn something about Kosovo which isn't Albanian propaganda. I'm not calling you a liar, I'm trying to say that the information in your head which you think is true - is a lie. I'm not misinterpreting anything here, I'm stating the facts as they are. There is a movie called \"pozdravi sa Kosova\", I'm not sure how they translated it into Albanian, it's a Serbo-Albanian movie about Kosovo and the role of the media in the conflict. Its quite interesting, I'll try to find it for you (since I couldn't find \"Does Anyone Have a Plan?\", searched everywhere for it...). -- +++$+++ :::I'm sad that you don't want to continue this conversation here, maybe you don't want Kseferovic to actually learn something about Kosovo which isn't Albanian propaganda. I'm not calling you a liar, I'm trying to say that the information in your head which you think is true - is a lie. I'm not misinterpreting anything here, I'm stating the facts as they are. There is a movie called "pozdravi sa Kosova", I'm not sure how they translated it into Albanian, it's a Serbo-Albanian movie about Kosovo and the role of the media in the conflict. Its quite interesting, I'll try to find it for you (since I couldn't find "Does Anyone Have a Plan?", searched everywhere for it...). --[[User:Bormalagurski|<font color="#003399">'''serbiana'''</font>]] [[Yugoslavia|'''-''']] [[User_talk:Bormalagurski|<font color="#A61022">'''talk'''</font>]] 01:26, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
531957 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531952 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 10:16:00 +++$+++ 1.148058960E09 +++$+++ If Kseferovic is interested, I would sure continue here. I need to hear his \"go ahead\"  +++$+++ :::::If Kseferovic is interested, I would sure continue here. I need to hear his "go ahead" [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 10:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

269811 +++$+++ Dan56 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-06 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.239012240E09 +++$+++ If u r interested, this article needs a [[Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations#Music|GAN]] review.  +++$+++ If u r interested, this article needs a [[Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations#Music|GAN]] review. [[User:Dan56|Dan56]] ([[User talk:Dan56|talk]]) 03:04, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
269812 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269811 +++$+++ 269811 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.239155640E09 +++$+++ I would like to, as you know that I like your writing.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I would like to, as you know that I like your writing.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

7668 +++$+++ CJLippert +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7668 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-27 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.285572960E09 +++$+++ Curious as to your decision to restore the \"List of foreign place names in Japanese\" but having it as part of your sandbox. If my memory serves me, after I had started the article, a decision was made that it would be better for this type of article to be housed at Wiktionary instead of at Wikipedia, it was deleted in Wikipedia, but also not created in Wiktionary. Since its deletion, the Japanese article has been beefed up, as have the German article.  +++$+++ Curious as to your decision to restore the "List of foreign place names in Japanese" but having it as part of your sandbox. If my memory serves me, after I had started the article, a decision was made that it would be better for this type of article to be housed at Wiktionary instead of at Wikipedia, it was deleted in Wikipedia, but also not created in Wiktionary. Since its deletion, the Japanese article has been beefed up, as have the German article. [[User:CJLippert|CJLippert]] ([[User talk:CJLippert|talk]]) 00:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
7669 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7668 +++$+++ 7668 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.285594920E09 +++$+++ I'm not planning to use it \"as-is\", I need the information from it for a local placename etymology article. So nice for everyone to question me on this undelete request.-- +++$+++ :I'm not planning to use it "as-is", I need the information from it for a local placename etymology article. So nice for everyone to question me on this undelete request.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 06:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
7670 +++$+++ CJLippert +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7668 +++$+++ 7669 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.285614900E09 +++$+++ As the article was never transwiki'd to Wiktionary, if you know how do it (as I don't), would you mind doing that while you have the page there with you?  +++$+++ ::As the article was never transwiki'd to Wiktionary, if you know how do it (as I don't), would you mind doing that while you have the page there with you? [[User:CJLippert|CJLippert]] ([[User talk:CJLippert|talk]]) 12:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
7671 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7668 +++$+++ 7668 +++$+++ 2010-10-04 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.286185200E09 +++$+++ I don't know how to do it either.-- +++$+++ :I don't know how to do it either.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 02:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

263422 +++$+++ Filthish +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-04 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.146726060E09 +++$+++ Viking Skull are an important musical force within the United Kindgom, they ahve performed on the main stage at the DOWNLOAD festival to over 50,000 people. There albums are available and have sold in large quantities through highstreet retailers as well as online retailers. They are frequently featured in metal magazines in europe. I have no affiliation with the band other than having seen them twice at large venues\/events. This is a genuine article which is significant!! Please reply and lift the restraint on me adding the information I've spent the last 1hr formatting. Please reply -- +++$+++ Viking Skull are an important musical force within the United Kindgom, they ahve performed on the main stage at the DOWNLOAD festival to over 50,000 people. There albums are available and have sold in large quantities through highstreet retailers as well as online retailers. They are frequently featured in metal magazines in europe. I have no affiliation with the band other than having seen them twice at large venues/events. This is a genuine article which is significant!! Please reply and lift the restraint on me adding the information I've spent the last 1hr formatting. Please reply --[[User:Filthish|Filthish]] 00:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
263423 +++$+++ Filthish +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263422 +++$+++ 263422 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.146726360E09 +++$+++ I have re-created the page despite your objections and I will endeavour to find new information and finish it when I finish my current block of nightshifts --> [[Viking Skull]] -- +++$+++ : I have re-created the page despite your objections and I will endeavour to find new information and finish it when I finish my current block of nightshifts --> [[Viking Skull]] --[[User:Filthish|Filthish]] 00:06, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
263424 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263422 +++$+++ 263423 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.146726900E09 +++$+++ OK -- the article now expresses notability. However, you cannot use those album covers in the article at present, because you are not providing a commentary about them. They are only there for illustration. You could have used them on articles about the albums themselves. You also need to provide refernces for your article. To prevent further speedy deletions, it would be a good idea to complete the article in your user space first (perhaps as a subpage) before transferring it to main space.  +++$+++ ::OK -- the article now expresses notability. However, you cannot use those album covers in the article at present, because you are not providing a commentary about them. They are only there for illustration. You could have used them on articles about the albums themselves. You also need to provide refernces for your article. To prevent further speedy deletions, it would be a good idea to complete the article in your user space first (perhaps as a subpage) before transferring it to main space. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 00:15, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
263425 +++$+++ Filthish +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263422 +++$+++ 263424 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.146727140E09 +++$+++ Ok, I understand your objections. But User-Space? What is this? -- +++$+++ ::: Ok, I understand your objections. But User-Space? What is this? --[[User:Filthish|Filthish]] 00:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
263426 +++$+++ Filthish +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263422 +++$+++ 263424 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.146727260E09 +++$+++ Oh, on my '''user-page''', ok. Yeah, good idea. that had not occured to me, thank you -- +++$+++ ::: Oh, on my '''user-page''', ok. Yeah, good idea. that had not occured to me, thank you --[[User:Filthish|Filthish]] 00:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
263427 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263422 +++$+++ 263426 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.146727560E09 +++$+++ Yeah, but you can expand 'user space'. So, for example, you could create [[User:Filthish\/Sandbox]] (or whatever you want to name it) as a place to test out formatting etc. You can do practically what you like in there! That way you can draft your articles, so they are fully formed and referenced articles by the time you put them in 'main' space. Many users have subpages like that for various reasons. I have one at the moment for an article I'm working on that isn't good enough to create in main space yet.  +++$+++ ::::Yeah, but you can expand 'user space'. So, for example, you could create [[User:Filthish/Sandbox]] (or whatever you want to name it) as a place to test out formatting etc. You can do practically what you like in there! That way you can draft your articles, so they are fully formed and referenced articles by the time you put them in 'main' space. Many users have subpages like that for various reasons. I have one at the moment for an article I'm working on that isn't good enough to create in main space yet. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 00:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

531958 +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-19 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.148030220E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Kseferovic|Kseferovic]] 02:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
531959 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531958 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 10:17:00 +++$+++ 1.148059020E09 +++$+++ Yes, I've seen all parts of this documentary, thanks for the link.  +++$+++ ::Yes, I've seen all parts of this documentary, thanks for the link. [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 10:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

269815 +++$+++ Chillum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-07 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.239093300E09 +++$+++ The more brains I have helping me the better I can get this concept across to people. More brains can also be a potent [[sanity check]].  +++$+++ The more brains I have helping me the better I can get this concept across to people. More brains can also be a potent [[sanity check]]. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color="Green">'''Chillum'''</font>]] 01:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
269816 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269815 +++$+++ 269815 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.239130800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for inviting me to participate. I would have been glad to contribute, except for the outcome of my one post on your page, a comment meant to be helpful. Apparently posts on your pages followed. I cannot risk another such outcome, wanting to stay away from that kind of trouble; I personally do not get involved in AN\/I drama and must refuse any offer that has that potential. Posting on your pages appears to have that result. Therefore, I will not do so in the future. Thank you for thinking of me. Under other circumstances I would be pleased to be part of your project. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks for inviting me to participate. I would have been glad to contribute, except for the outcome of my one post on your page, a comment meant to be helpful. Apparently posts on your pages followed. I cannot risk another such outcome, wanting to stay away from that kind of trouble; I personally do not get involved in AN/I drama and must refuse any offer that has that potential. Posting on your pages appears to have that result. Therefore, I will not do so in the future. Thank you for thinking of me. Under other circumstances I would be pleased to be part of your project. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

7673 +++$+++ Axl +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-29 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.285779120E09 +++$+++ I have posted a GA reassessment at [[Talk:Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China]]. Please feel free to comment.  +++$+++ I have posted a GA reassessment at [[Talk:Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China]]. Please feel free to comment. [[User:Axl|<font color="#808000">'''Axl'''</font>]] <font color="#3CB371">¤</font> <small>[[User talk:Axl|<font color="#808000">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 09:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
7674 +++$+++ Axl +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7673 +++$+++ 7673 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.286294340E09 +++$+++ Please comment [[Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment#Organ_transplantation_in_the_People.27s_Republic_of_China|here]].  +++$+++ : Please comment [[Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment#Organ_transplantation_in_the_People.27s_Republic_of_China|here]]. [[User:Axl|<font color="#808000">'''Axl'''</font>]] <font color="#3CB371">¤</font> <small>[[User talk:Axl|<font color="#808000">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 08:59, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

531962 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-19 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.148047020E09 +++$+++ Was that you? You left your message unsigned. Well, it is not true that Albania is ahaid of Bosnia and Serbia in joining the EU, but it is very much correct that it's ahead in many, many things - while its backward on many others. Did you ever see Tirana, for instance? The City is by far one of the most beautiful that I have ever seen, and it simply beames with art from the romantic nationalist age and Medieval-style architecture. By far, one of the most beautiful European metropolises, and most certainly among the prettiest in the Balkan peninsular. -- +++$+++ Was that you? You left your message unsigned. Well, it is not true that Albania is ahaid of Bosnia and Serbia in joining the EU, but it is very much correct that it's ahead in many, many things - while its backward on many others. Did you ever see Tirana, for instance? The City is by far one of the most beautiful that I have ever seen, and it simply beames with art from the romantic nationalist age and Medieval-style architecture. By far, one of the most beautiful European metropolises, and most certainly among the prettiest in the Balkan peninsular. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 06:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
531963 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531962 +++$+++ 531962 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.148047440E09 +++$+++ P. S. Why don't you make a World Map for the Cold War? -- +++$+++ :P. S. Why don't you make a World Map for the Cold War? --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 07:04, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
531964 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531962 +++$+++ 531963 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.148059380E09 +++$+++ hehe HRE, you do have some good info, but some are exaggerated. And living in Belgrade, I am not surprised that you think so. First of all, Albanians in Albania are one of the least nationalists nations in the whole Balkans. Crime and corruption exists like everywhere in the Balkans, but PM Berisha has received good evaluations on his attempts to erradicate that. Comparing it to Moldova is offensive, if you don't know the real facts. We all know where tereotypes about Albanians have been cooked. One of the worst stereotypes I once heard, that Albanians have tails. It was funny when I studied in an international environment, some Serb asked me \"I thought Albanians should be not tall, and rather blondish, and without mustache\"...horrible. HRE, get updated on Albania's current political situation. It is far from what you think.  +++$+++ ::hehe HRE, you do have some good info, but some are exaggerated. And living in Belgrade, I am not surprised that you think so. First of all, Albanians in Albania are one of the least nationalists nations in the whole Balkans. Crime and corruption exists like everywhere in the Balkans, but PM Berisha has received good evaluations on his attempts to erradicate that. Comparing it to Moldova is offensive, if you don't know the real facts. We all know where tereotypes about Albanians have been cooked. One of the worst stereotypes I once heard, that Albanians have tails. It was funny when I studied in an international environment, some Serb asked me "I thought Albanians should be not tall, and rather blondish, and without mustache"...horrible. HRE, get updated on Albania's current political situation. It is far from what you think. [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 10:23, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
531965 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531962 +++$+++ 531964 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.148143620E09 +++$+++ Sorry, Kseferovic, for using your talk page to reply. Oh, and Ilir, you've been wiki-stalking me. ;) -- +++$+++ ::: Sorry, Kseferovic, for using your talk page to reply. Oh, and Ilir, you've been wiki-stalking me. ;) --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 09:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
531966 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531962 +++$+++ 531963 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.148161620E09 +++$+++ \"what Europe thinks\" ??? that is some claim, HRE. I\xb4ve travelled all around Europe, and most of the contacts I had I wanted to confirm this \"what Europe thinks\" and most of them just remembered the war and the bombing, and none ever heard of Albanian bad stories before. I am not sure about which Europe you are talking about.  +++$+++ ::"what Europe thinks" ??? that is some claim, HRE. I´ve travelled all around Europe, and most of the contacts I had I wanted to confirm this "what Europe thinks" and most of them just remembered the war and the bombing, and none ever heard of Albanian bad stories before. I am not sure about which Europe you are talking about. [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 14:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

7675 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-04 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.286185080E09 +++$+++ See this. Gave you and I both credit for it. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ See this. Gave you and I both credit for it. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 02:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
7676 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7675 +++$+++ 7675 +++$+++ 2010-10-04 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.286185140E09 +++$+++ Thank you for cleaning it up, DYKing it and the heads up!-- +++$+++ :Thank you for cleaning it up, DYKing it and the heads up!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 02:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

531967 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531967 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-20 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.148143980E09 +++$+++ Evo, pitaj mene o Kosovu - ja sam ti (nazovi-)historicar (tj. neka vrsta). Na primjer, ja mislim da Kosovo kao suverena drzava ne bi bila dobra, i ne mogu to otvoreno da podrzim, bez podrzavanja novoga rata u Bosni i Hercegovini (tj, BiH-ovo rasturanje). Selam Alejkum! -- +++$+++ Evo, pitaj mene o Kosovu - ja sam ti (nazovi-)historicar (tj. neka vrsta). Na primjer, ja mislim da Kosovo kao suverena drzava ne bi bila dobra, i ne mogu to otvoreno da podrzim, bez podrzavanja novoga rata u Bosni i Hercegovini (tj, BiH-ovo rasturanje). Selam Alejkum! --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 09:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
531968 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531967 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.148161500E09 +++$+++ Feel free to ask me as well, Kseferovic. I am not a historian, but I can tell you what you need from 1980 and on. For the information previous to that I cannot speculate with the documents that Balkans historians adapted according to their needs. I do not see how Kosovo is related to a new bloodshed in Bosnia, HRE. And I think that independence to Kosovo is the only solution to the crisis in the region, and the rest of Balkans. That has been acknowledged by many from the [http:\/\/www.b92.net\/info\/vesti\/u_fokusu.php?id=24&start=0&nav_id=198163 international community]. Only the Serbian regime is hesitating, but I think that is temporary, as they know the reality as well. They are just trying to get the best out of negotiations, by having extreme demands. For some (rather neutral opinions) see [http:\/\/www.otvoreno.co.yu Otvoreno] where Serbian politicians admit the facts about Kosovo , and [http:\/\/www.kosovakosovo.com here] you can see some information as well.   +++$+++ ::Feel free to ask me as well, Kseferovic. I am not a historian, but I can tell you what you need from 1980 and on. For the information previous to that I cannot speculate with the documents that Balkans historians adapted according to their needs. I do not see how Kosovo is related to a new bloodshed in Bosnia, HRE. And I think that independence to Kosovo is the only solution to the crisis in the region, and the rest of Balkans. That has been acknowledged by many from the [http://www.b92.net/info/vesti/u_fokusu.php?id=24&start=0&nav_id=198163 international community]. Only the Serbian regime is hesitating, but I think that is temporary, as they know the reality as well. They are just trying to get the best out of negotiations, by having extreme demands. For some (rather neutral opinions) see [http://www.otvoreno.co.yu Otvoreno] where Serbian politicians admit the facts about Kosovo , and [http://www.kosovakosovo.com here] you can see some information as well.  [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 14:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
531969 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531967 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.148165460E09 +++$+++ Hi Kseferovic, thanks for dropping a line in my talk page. Situation in Kosovo now is better than it ever was in its history. The democratic institutions are building up, and getting stronger and stronger. And the awareness that there is no alternative to the independence for Kosovo is increasing in the international community. Now it is not the question if, but when will the independence of Kosovo be formally recognized, this or in the beginning of the next year. As far as Montenegro's independence referendum is concerned, if Montenegro seceedes that is another reason why Kosovo should not be in any kind of federation with Serbia, as its closest allies EVER are leaving that federation. Not sure what you meant by \"will the situation cool down\". If you explain I might be able to answer to that part.  +++$+++ ::Hi Kseferovic, thanks for dropping a line in my talk page. Situation in Kosovo now is better than it ever was in its history. The democratic institutions are building up, and getting stronger and stronger. And the awareness that there is no alternative to the independence for Kosovo is increasing in the international community. Now it is not the question if, but when will the independence of Kosovo be formally recognized, this or in the beginning of the next year. As far as Montenegro's independence referendum is concerned, if Montenegro seceedes that is another reason why Kosovo should not be in any kind of federation with Serbia, as its closest allies EVER are leaving that federation. Not sure what you meant by "will the situation cool down". If you explain I might be able to answer to that part. [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 15:51, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
531970 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531967 +++$+++ 531967 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.148186340E09 +++$+++ Selam Alejkum! -- +++$+++ :Selam Alejkum! --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 21:39, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

7680 +++$+++ Gliese876 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-10 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.286725560E09 +++$+++ \u3053\u3093\u306b\u3061\u306f\u3002;) Over the past year or so I've been working on gradually expanding the article on German-Japanese relations. I've recently discovered the pictures of the Hitlerjugend visiting the Meiji Shrine in Tokyo that you've uploaded. So far I've hastily implemented one of them in the article, but I'd like to ask you, if you could elaborate on that visit (and\/or similar ones during these years) in a short paragraph at approximately the place the image sits now. Thanks :)  +++$+++ こんにちは。;) Over the past year or so I've been working on gradually expanding the article on German-Japanese relations. I've recently discovered the pictures of the Hitlerjugend visiting the Meiji Shrine in Tokyo that you've uploaded. So far I've hastily implemented one of them in the article, but I'd like to ask you, if you could elaborate on that visit (and/or similar ones during these years) in a short paragraph at approximately the place the image sits now. Thanks :) [[User:Gliese876|Gliese876]] ([[User talk:Gliese876|talk]]) 08:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
7681 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7680 +++$+++ 7680 +++$+++ 2010-10-10 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.286725740E09 +++$+++ I will do my best.-- +++$+++ :I will do my best.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 08:49, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

394496 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-15 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.171532100E09 +++$+++ Hey. I'm putting up this article you created for deletion due to the fact that it makes no attempt to establish notability. If you disagree, you can remove the tag so long as you expand this article. -- +++$+++ Hey. I'm putting up this article you created for deletion due to the fact that it makes no attempt to establish notability. If you disagree, you can remove the tag so long as you expand this article. --[[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#0D0;background:#009">Wizardman</span>]] 01:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
394497 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394496 +++$+++ 394496 +++$+++ 2007-02-15 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.171536720E09 +++$+++ Well, there's no firm policy in place because schools are such a heated issue. Still, is there a big event that happened in the school's history? Is it recognized for a great finish at a national academics event? The addition of things like that would help it show notability. Right now all it says is that it's a school in Kentucky, so any additions can only help the article. -- +++$+++ :Well, there's no firm policy in place because schools are such a heated issue. Still, is there a big event that happened in the school's history? Is it recognized for a great finish at a national academics event? The addition of things like that would help it show notability. Right now all it says is that it's a school in Kentucky, so any additions can only help the article. --[[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#0D0;background:#009">Wizardman</span>]] 02:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
394498 +++$+++ Anthony5429 +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394496 +++$+++ 394497 +++$+++ 2007-02-15 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.171536900E09 +++$+++ Okay. Thanks. I will try to improve the article if I get the time. -- +++$+++ ::Okay. Thanks. I will try to improve the article if I get the time. --[[User:Anthony5429|Anthony5429]] 02:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

269826 +++$+++ Aloysius +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269826 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-08 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.239240720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your question. Yes, your interpretation is right, I might say in the hook Kisza is a painter. And it is true that he not only runs it but also owns it - my English is troublesome a bit. Can you suggest a new hook? Thanks a lot for help. Today I want to add some photos.-- +++$+++ Thanks for your question. Yes, your interpretation is right, I might say in the hook Kisza is a painter. And it is true that he not only runs it but also owns it - my English is troublesome a bit. Can you suggest a new hook? Thanks a lot for help. Today I want to add some photos.--[[User:Aloysius|Aloysius]] ([[User talk:Aloysius|talk]]) 18:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
269827 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269826 +++$+++ 269826 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.239241260E09 +++$+++ And the collection is of his work as well as that of others? But the largest single artist collection in Europe in the gallery is his? Some photos would be great! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :And the collection is of his work as well as that of others? But the largest single artist collection in Europe in the gallery is his? Some photos would be great! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
269828 +++$+++ Aloysius +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269826 +++$+++ 269827 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.239242220E09 +++$+++ There is only his work in the gallery. And I can copy a photo from his book - I even asked him if I can use scans from his book for wikipedia but I am not sure how to prove that he agreed.-- +++$+++ :: There is only his work in the gallery. And I can copy a photo from his book - I even asked him if I can use scans from his book for wikipedia but I am not sure how to prove that he agreed.--[[User:Aloysius|Aloysius]] ([[User talk:Aloysius|talk]]) 18:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
269829 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269826 +++$+++ 269828 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.239242880E09 +++$+++ If you have a letter from him agreeing, you can send it to OTRS to get an OTRS ticket. I will look more into that, as I am not sure how that is done. &mdash; +++$+++ :::If you have a letter from him agreeing, you can send it to OTRS to get an OTRS ticket. I will look more into that, as I am not sure how that is done. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:08, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
269830 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269826 +++$+++ 269829 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.239243900E09 +++$+++ I have asked at the [[Wikipedia:Help desk]] what you should do to prove you have permission.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&diff=prev&oldid=282612013] I will let you know what I find out.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I have asked at the [[Wikipedia:Help desk]] what you should do to prove you have permission.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&diff=prev&oldid=282612013] I will let you know what I find out.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:25, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
269831 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269826 +++$+++ 269830 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.239244380E09 +++$+++ The problem is that the photographer who took the pictures in the book also has a copyright in her\/his photos; possibly, so does the publisher of the book! All parties involved would have to grant permission under one of our licenses. -- +++$+++ :::::The problem is that the photographer who took the pictures in the book also has a copyright in her/his photos; possibly, so does the publisher of the book! All parties involved would have to grant permission under one of our licenses. --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  &#x007C;  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 19:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
269832 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269826 +++$+++ 269831 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.239245400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the answer! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::Thanks for the answer! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

7683 +++$+++ Clovis Sangrail +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-19 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.287475200E09 +++$+++ Hi, I refomatted your comment slightly on the BBW talk page to try and help construct some consensus [[Talk:Big Beautiful Woman]].  Please check it to ensure I've understood your meaning.  Cheers  +++$+++ Hi, I refomatted your comment slightly on the BBW talk page to try and help construct some consensus [[Talk:Big Beautiful Woman]].  Please check it to ensure I've understood your meaning.  Cheers [[User:Clovis Sangrail|Clovis Sangrail]] ([[User talk:Clovis Sangrail|talk]]) 01:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
7684 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7683 +++$+++ 7683 +++$+++ 2010-10-19 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.287475380E09 +++$+++ Close, and thanks for the heads up.-- +++$+++ :Close, and thanks for the heads up.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 01:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

7685 +++$+++ SarekOfVulcan +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-21 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.287705600E09 +++$+++ Please watch it with the edit summaries -- I know you don't make a habit of it, but good to avoid anyway. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Please watch it with the edit summaries -- I know you don't make a habit of it, but good to avoid anyway. Thanks. --[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] ([[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|talk]]) 17:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
7686 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7685 +++$+++ 7685 +++$+++ 2010-10-21 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.287705720E09 +++$+++ Nope, that was very intentional on my part, and said exactly what I needed to say. I appreciate your sentiment, but sometimes softness won't do.-- +++$+++ :Nope, that was very intentional on my part, and said exactly what I needed to say. I appreciate your sentiment, but sometimes softness won't do.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 17:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

531974 +++$+++ Nightstallion +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-26 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.148647560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for separating Serbia and Montenegro in the EU member states article map; could you do the same for a number of other articles? Would be great. =] Just say if so, then I can give you a list. You should upload the new map on top of the old one, though, not under a new file name. &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">Nightst<\/span>]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Nightstallion\/esperanza|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">a<\/span>]]<\/font> +++$+++ Thanks for separating Serbia and Montenegro in the EU member states article map; could you do the same for a number of other articles? Would be great. =] Just say if so, then I can give you a list. You should upload the new map on top of the old one, though, not under a new file name. &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightst</span>]]<font color="green">[[User:Nightstallion/esperanza|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">a</span>]]</font>[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">llion</span>]] [[User talk:Nightstallion|''(?)'']] 05:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
531975 +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531974 +++$+++ 531974 +++$+++ 2006-05-26 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.148668740E09 +++$+++ Sure I'll do it (Change the maps) for all of the images. Just give me all of the article names and I will do it as soon as possible. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Sure I'll do it (Change the maps) for all of the images. Just give me all of the article names and I will do it as soon as possible. Thanks, [[User:Kseferovic|Kseferovic]] 11:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
531976 +++$+++ Nightstallion +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531974 +++$+++ 531975 +++$+++ 2006-05-26 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.148669220E09 +++$+++ It will take some time, though, since there's really a *lot* of maps to be updated, and not all are even categorised correctly... Another problem will be that we may run into trouble with people who think the maps should only be updated once Montenegro is entirely independent... We should probably wait until independence is offially proclaimed, aye? &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">Nightst<\/span>]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Nightstallion\/esperanza|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">a<\/span>]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::It will take some time, though, since there's really a *lot* of maps to be updated, and not all are even categorised correctly... Another problem will be that we may run into trouble with people who think the maps should only be updated once Montenegro is entirely independent... We should probably wait until independence is offially proclaimed, aye? &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightst</span>]]<font color="green">[[User:Nightstallion/esperanza|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">a</span>]]</font>[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">llion</span>]] [[User talk:Nightstallion|''(?)'']] 11:47, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
531977 +++$+++ Nightstallion +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531974 +++$+++ 531974 +++$+++ 2006-05-26 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.148692860E09 +++$+++ Incidentally, are you sure your borders of Montenegro are correct? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Euro_accession.PNG These] are correct as far as I know, and they differ from [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:European_Union_member_states_with_applications.png yours]... &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">Nightst<\/span>]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Nightstallion\/esperanza|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">a<\/span>]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Incidentally, are you sure your borders of Montenegro are correct? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Euro_accession.PNG These] are correct as far as I know, and they differ from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:European_Union_member_states_with_applications.png yours]... &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightst</span>]]<font color="green">[[User:Nightstallion/esperanza|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">a</span>]]</font>[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">llion</span>]] [[User talk:Nightstallion|''(?)'']] 18:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
531978 +++$+++ Nightstallion +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 531974 +++$+++ 531977 +++$+++ 2006-06-04 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.149461460E09 +++$+++ One map I'd need update for one of \"my\" articles is [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Image:European_Union_commemorative_2_euro_coins.png this one]. Apart from that, almost all location maps in the country and territory articles for Europe need updating, likely all maps in [[:Category:Europe]] here *and* on the commons, and so on... &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">Nightst<\/span>]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Nightstallion\/esperanza|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">a<\/span>]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::One map I'd need update for one of "my" articles is [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:European_Union_commemorative_2_euro_coins.png this one]. Apart from that, almost all location maps in the country and territory articles for Europe need updating, likely all maps in [[:Category:Europe]] here *and* on the commons, and so on... &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightst</span>]]<font color="green">[[User:Nightstallion/esperanza|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">a</span>]]</font>[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">llion</span>]] [[User talk:Nightstallion|''(?)'']] 15:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

7687 +++$+++ Breitkopf +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7687 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-24 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.287986880E09 +++$+++ I wonder if you can help with the Spanish page dealing with the Marxist MIR and FPMR guerrilla groups in Chile in the 70s and 80s: [[http:\/\/es.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Acciones_armadas_de_extrema_izquierda_en_Chile]] . There are two individuals bent on sweeping their crimes under the carpet. I don't think this is fair, for I have provided reliable sources. There are many lies propagated by the left, like the belief held by many ill informed Chileans, that 200,000 to 1 million were exiled and the vast majority of the armed forces personnel, that appear in their roll of honour, were in fact killed at the hands of their superiors. This is an insult to their families. In reality their were a handful (about a dozen) that were court-martialled and shot, although over a hundred were jailed or exiled. I strive to separate fact from fiction, but instead get penalized for it.-- +++$+++ I wonder if you can help with the Spanish page dealing with the Marxist MIR and FPMR guerrilla groups in Chile in the 70s and 80s: [[http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acciones_armadas_de_extrema_izquierda_en_Chile]] . There are two individuals bent on sweeping their crimes under the carpet. I don't think this is fair, for I have provided reliable sources. There are many lies propagated by the left, like the belief held by many ill informed Chileans, that 200,000 to 1 million were exiled and the vast majority of the armed forces personnel, that appear in their roll of honour, were in fact killed at the hands of their superiors. This is an insult to their families. In reality their were a handful (about a dozen) that were court-martialled and shot, although over a hundred were jailed or exiled. I strive to separate fact from fiction, but instead get penalized for it.--[[User:Breitkopf|Breitkopf]] ([[User talk:Breitkopf|talk]]) 23:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
7688 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7687 +++$+++ 7687 +++$+++ 2010-10-24 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.287987900E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, I don't speak Spanish. :( Lo siento mucho.-- +++$+++ :Unfortunately, I don't speak Spanish. :( Lo siento mucho.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 23:25, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

269833 +++$+++ Alan De Smet +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-08 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.239249660E09 +++$+++ In your comment about the [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Violet_.28computer_game.29_.28history.29|DYK for Violet (computer game)]], I believe you overlooked that the article moved from user space to article space on the 8th, which I believe per [[Wikipedia:Did_you_know\/Additional_rules#Other_additional_rules_for_the_article|D7]] qualifies as new for DYK.  Would you be so kind as to review your statement?  Thanks for taking the time to review my nomination! \u2014  +++$+++ In your comment about the [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Violet_.28computer_game.29_.28history.29|DYK for Violet (computer game)]], I believe you overlooked that the article moved from user space to article space on the 8th, which I believe per [[Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Additional_rules#Other_additional_rules_for_the_article|D7]] qualifies as new for DYK.  Would you be so kind as to review your statement?  Thanks for taking the time to review my nomination! — [[User:Alan De Smet|Alan De&nbsp;Smet]] | [[User talk:Alan De Smet|Talk]] 21:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
269834 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269833 +++$+++ 269833 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.239249960E09 +++$+++ Yes, I will. I could very well have overlooked a move from user space. My apologies. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes, I will. I could very well have overlooked a move from user space. My apologies. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

7690 +++$+++ Whpq +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-03 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.288832520E09 +++$+++ Hi, you added the {{tl|wikify}} tag to [[Akashi Domain]], but I could see no need for wikification so I removed it.  Did I miss something because I don't see what needs to be done.  --  +++$+++ Hi, you added the {{tl|wikify}} tag to [[Akashi Domain]], but I could see no need for wikification so I removed it.  Did I miss something because I don't see what needs to be done.  -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 18:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
7691 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7690 +++$+++ 7690 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.288858740E09 +++$+++ Ah, I meant the sources need to be, uh, sourcified.-- +++$+++ :Ah, I meant the sources need to be, uh, sourcified.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 01:19, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

269835 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-10 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.239397740E09 +++$+++ Could you try again looking for the PDF at http:\/\/www.amherst.ny.us\/pdf\/planning\/snyder\/actionplan.pdf, the main source for DYK nomination [[Snyder, New York]]?  It downloads for me (size of 4.62 MB), although it's slower than many other PDFs to download.   +++$+++ Could you try again looking for the PDF at http://www.amherst.ny.us/pdf/planning/snyder/actionplan.pdf, the main source for DYK nomination [[Snyder, New York]]?  It downloads for me (size of 4.62 MB), although it's slower than many other PDFs to download.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 14:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
269836 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269835 +++$+++ 269835 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.239398520E09 +++$+++ Great! I was able to look at it with no problems. I suspected that it was a temporary problem. Thanks, &mdash; +++$+++ :Great! I was able to look at it with no problems. I suspected that it was a temporary problem. Thanks, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:22, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

7692 +++$+++ Bk314159 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-04 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.288862280E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px|]] I noticed the message you recently left to [[User_Talk:99.231.241.146|99.231.241.146]]. Please remember: [[WP:BITE|do not bite the newcomers]]. If you see someone make a [[WP:ACM|common mistake]], try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-bite --> ''This is especially considering your comment at [[Talk:Sriracha sauce]], where you said \"I feel no need to justify myself to an IP\".'' --  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px|]] I noticed the message you recently left to [[User_Talk:99.231.241.146|99.231.241.146]]. Please remember: [[WP:BITE|do not bite the newcomers]]. If you see someone make a [[WP:ACM|common mistake]], try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-bite --> ''This is especially considering your comment at [[Talk:Sriracha sauce]], where you said "I feel no need to justify myself to an IP".'' -- [[User:Bk314159|Bk314159]] ([[User talk:Bk314159|Talk to me]] and [[Special:Contributions/Bk314159|find out what I've done]]) 02:18, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
7693 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7692 +++$+++ 7692 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.288862460E09 +++$+++ I wasn't biting him because he was new, I was biting him because he was contentious, also explained on that page. Look at my history, I also welcome IPs. I just don't welcome fights.-- +++$+++ :I wasn't biting him because he was new, I was biting him because he was contentious, also explained on that page. Look at my history, I also welcome IPs. I just don't welcome fights.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 02:21, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
7694 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7692 +++$+++ 7693 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.288862640E09 +++$+++ And the accusation of antiJapanese racism was over the top, you can also check my edit history for that one, I love everything about this country.-- +++$+++ ::And the accusation of antiJapanese racism was over the top, you can also check my edit history for that one, I love everything about this country.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 02:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

7695 +++$+++ btphelps  +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-04 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.288916280E09 +++$+++ Your edits adding more picture parameters to the  [[Template:Infobox family name]] infobox is apparently now causing the same image to appear twice in the infobox, as found on [[Phelps (surname)]]. --  +++$+++ Your edits adding more picture parameters to the  [[Template:Infobox family name]] infobox is apparently now causing the same image to appear twice in the infobox, as found on [[Phelps (surname)]]. -- [[User:btphelps|btphelps]] <sup>([[User_talk:Btphelps |talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Btphelps |contribs]])</sup> 17:18, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
7696 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7695 +++$+++ 7695 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.288937940E09 +++$+++ Ah, crud. Okay, I'll undo it, please read the talkpage for ''what'' I want to do, is there any way this is  possible?-- +++$+++ :Ah, crud. Okay, I'll undo it, please read the talkpage for ''what'' I want to do, is there any way this is  possible?--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 23:19, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
7697 +++$+++ btphelps  +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7695 +++$+++ 7696 +++$+++ 2010-11-08 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.289222760E09 +++$+++ I'm no expert, but I tried adding image2 ... image3 and using those names as parameters and no duplicate images are showing. I checked two other pages that use the template and all seems fine. If you want to change a parameter name to \"coatofarms\" or \"familyshield\" feel free. --  +++$+++ :: I'm no expert, but I tried adding image2 ... image3 and using those names as parameters and no duplicate images are showing. I checked two other pages that use the template and all seems fine. If you want to change a parameter name to "coatofarms" or "familyshield" feel free. -- [[User:btphelps|btphelps]] <sup>([[User_talk:Btphelps |talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Btphelps |contribs]])</sup> 05:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
7698 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7695 +++$+++ 7695 +++$+++ 2010-11-08 05:34:00 +++$+++ 1.289223240E09 +++$+++ Just tried it, the second image shows but not the third.-- +++$+++ :Just tried it, the second image shows but not the third.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 05:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
7699 +++$+++ btphelps  +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7695 +++$+++ 7698 +++$+++ 2010-11-08 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.289223900E09 +++$+++ Tried adding num to image_size paramater. Try it again. --  +++$+++ :: Tried adding num to image_size paramater. Try it again. -- [[User:btphelps|btphelps]] <sup>([[User_talk:Btphelps |talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Btphelps |contribs]])</sup> 05:45, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
7700 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7695 +++$+++ 7695 +++$+++ 2010-11-08 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.289224980E09 +++$+++ Nothin' yet.-- +++$+++ :Nothin' yet.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 06:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

269841 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-10 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.239421200E09 +++$+++ Just beep me if there are any concerns. Yep, it went through a lot of work; me and Viditras hammered at it for a full month :P I'ts nice that someone picked it up; it's been at GAN for over 2 weeks (as has my other GA, [[Hawaii hotspot]]). My goal for the article is an FA. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ Just beep me if there are any concerns. Yep, it went through a lot of work; me and Viditras hammered at it for a full month :P I'ts nice that someone picked it up; it's been at GAN for over 2 weeks (as has my other GA, [[Hawaii hotspot]]). My goal for the article is an FA. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="black">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="black">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario|Mar]]</font></span> 20:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
269842 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269841 +++$+++ 269841 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.239421680E09 +++$+++ FA seems like an appropriate goal. It is a very interesting and thorough article. I have been worrying about some FAC type things as I copy edit it. If there are two of you to jump in to rectify FAC objections, that is good.  &mdash; +++$+++ :FA seems like an appropriate goal. It is a very interesting and thorough article. I have been worrying about some FAC type things as I copy edit it. If there are two of you to jump in to rectify FAC objections, that is good.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
269843 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269841 +++$+++ 269842 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.239421860E09 +++$+++ I'm glad my work is appreciated! <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ ::I'm glad my work is appreciated! <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="black">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="black">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario|Mar]]</font></span> 20:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

269844 +++$+++ Snowmanradio +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269844 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-11 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.239485160E09 +++$+++ I wonder if you can classify this [http:\/\/caribjsci.org\/July08\/44_215-222.pdf ref] as a primary source or a secondary source. It has been used on the [[Saint Croix Macaw]] article. There is some discussion about it at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds#Saint_Croix_Macaw]].  +++$+++ I wonder if you can classify this [http://caribjsci.org/July08/44_215-222.pdf ref] as a primary source or a secondary source. It has been used on the [[Saint Croix Macaw]] article. There is some discussion about it at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds#Saint_Croix_Macaw]]. [[User:Snowmanradio|Snowman]] ([[User talk:Snowmanradio|talk]]) 14:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
269845 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269844 +++$+++ 269844 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.239569520E09 +++$+++ Answered on Snowmanradio's talk page. &mdash; +++$+++ :Answered on Snowmanradio's talk page. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

7701 +++$+++ Stepshep +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-06 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.289098920E09 +++$+++ Hi Chris, I thought you might be interested in this: [[User talk:Stepshep#State seals of Burma]]. You may want to make back-ups to save locally if they end up getting removed from Commons.  +++$+++ Hi Chris, I thought you might be interested in this: [[User talk:Stepshep#State seals of Burma]]. You may want to make back-ups to save locally if they end up getting removed from Commons. [[User:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Calibri;color:#625d5d;">'''Shep'''</span>]][[User talk:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Helvetica;color:#625d5d;"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 20:02, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
7702 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7701 +++$+++ 7701 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.289112960E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the headsup, that's a pity. Right now I am proudly on a week block at Commons for fighting the crapocracy, but I will comment when I am back.-- +++$+++ :Thank you for the headsup, that's a pity. Right now I am proudly on a week block at Commons for fighting the crapocracy, but I will comment when I am back.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 23:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
7703 +++$+++ btphelps  +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7701 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-08 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.289222820E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on fighting the good fight. --  +++$+++ ::: Congratulations on fighting the good fight. -- [[User:btphelps|btphelps]] <sup>([[User_talk:Btphelps |talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Btphelps |contribs]])</sup> 05:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
7704 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7701 +++$+++ 7701 +++$+++ 2010-11-08 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.289223360E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that's refreshing to hear, in the climate this has become lately, I appreciate it. Shame what happened to Randy.-- +++$+++ :Thanks, that's refreshing to hear, in the climate this has become lately, I appreciate it. Shame what happened to Randy.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 05:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
7705 +++$+++ btphelps  +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7701 +++$+++ 7704 +++$+++ 2010-11-08 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.289223960E09 +++$+++ Sorry, have been steering clear of administrivia and adminisdrama. I see his account is ''gone'', '''deleted''', like he never existed. He left or was encouraged to leave? --  +++$+++ :: Sorry, have been steering clear of administrivia and adminisdrama. I see his account is ''gone'', '''deleted''', like he never existed. He left or was encouraged to leave? -- [[User:btphelps|btphelps]] <sup>([[User_talk:Btphelps |talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Btphelps |contribs]])</sup> 05:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
7706 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7701 +++$+++ 7701 +++$+++ 2010-11-08 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.289225160E09 +++$+++ He got accused of plagiarism for actually ''over''sourcing an article. Admins eat their own, which is why I never wanted to be one. They're a necessary evil, in equal measure. See http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=395463652#Right.21_What.27s_going_on_with_RLevse.3F and http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Vanished_6551232 .-- +++$+++ :He got accused of plagiarism for actually ''over''sourcing an article. Admins eat their own, which is why I never wanted to be one. They're a necessary evil, in equal measure. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=395463652#Right.21_What.27s_going_on_with_RLevse.3F and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Vanished_6551232 .--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 06:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

269846 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-12 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.239533220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for removing the stub tag; I'd added it early in the writing stage, when I had much less information than I finished with, and forgot to remove it after expansion.   +++$+++ Thanks for removing the stub tag; I'd added it early in the writing stage, when I had much less information than I finished with, and forgot to remove it after expansion.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 03:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269847 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269846 +++$+++ 269846 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.239533400E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. It also needs a project template on the talk page, so the talk page is not a red link. I've been trying to find one!  &mdash; +++$+++ :You're welcome. It also needs a project template on the talk page, so the talk page is not a red link. I've been trying to find one!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269848 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269846 +++$+++ 269847 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.239533760E09 +++$+++ Another tag added.   +++$+++ ::Another tag added.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 03:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

576373 +++$+++ Sallicio +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576373 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-18 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.203349440E09 +++$+++ It's strange, as I was reading it, I could \"see\" him yelling (if that makes sense). From what I can see, very disgraceful from an admin or even a regular editor. Hopefully he won't have to go through what you did to learn the same lessons. I wonder what all his supporters at his RfA would have done if they saw this block of text during their decision-making at his RfA? As an unaffected third-party, I am considering reporting this behavior. What do you think ?-- +++$+++ It's strange, as I was reading it, I could "see" him yelling (if that makes sense). From what I can see, very disgraceful from an admin or even a regular editor. Hopefully he won't have to go through what you did to learn the same lessons. I wonder what all his supporters at his RfA would have done if they saw this block of text during their decision-making at his RfA? As an unaffected third-party, I am considering reporting this behavior. What do you think ?--[[User:Sallicio|Sallicio]][[User talk:Sallicio|<sup><math>\color{Red} \oplus</math></sup>]] 07:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
576374 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576373 +++$+++ 576373 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.203351480E09 +++$+++ No, please don't report it...it's from almost a week ago and I don't want to see more drama than we need. If this pattern persists then other steps will become necessary...but if we avoid each other as much as possible, then escalating this to further levels will become less likely.-- +++$+++ :No, please don't report it...it's from almost a week ago and I don't want to see more drama than we need. If this pattern persists then other steps will become necessary...but if we avoid each other as much as possible, then escalating this to further levels will become less likely.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 08:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
576375 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576373 +++$+++ 576374 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 08:31:00 +++$+++ 1.203352260E09 +++$+++ Constantly trying to besmirch me by accusing me of being \"involved with a dispute\" is hardly an attempt to avoid me MONGO, but yes my dealing with the issue was not to the best of my liking so I am only semi active now and do not actively seek out MONGO.  +++$+++ ::Constantly trying to besmirch me by accusing me of being "involved with a dispute" is hardly an attempt to avoid me MONGO, but yes my dealing with the issue was not to the best of my liking so I am only semi active now and do not actively seek out MONGO. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 08:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
576376 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576373 +++$+++ 576375 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.203352920E09 +++$+++ There is no doubt in my mind that PouponOnToast and you have been diametrically opposed to each others POV's about various issues. I'm done commenting on this issue.-- +++$+++ :::There is no doubt in my mind that PouponOnToast and you have been diametrically opposed to each others POV's about various issues. I'm done commenting on this issue.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 08:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
576377 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576373 +++$+++ 576373 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.203352200E09 +++$+++ Ha..well thank you...very much appreciated! Sometimes we have bad days...but there is no doubt that Viridae and I have had some difficulty getting along. Best wishes!-- +++$+++ :Ha..well thank you...very much appreciated! Sometimes we have bad days...but there is no doubt that Viridae and I have had some difficulty getting along. Best wishes!--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 08:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

269849 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-12 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.239547740E09 +++$+++ I know Bencherlite gave you a barnstar for this a couple of weeks ago, but I've been so impressed by your work ethic at [[T:TDYK]] over the last few weeks that I think you should have one of these. I know how much work there can be in verifiying hooks so I really think you have earned it!  +++$+++ I know Bencherlite gave you a barnstar for this a couple of weeks ago, but I've been so impressed by your work ethic at [[T:TDYK]] over the last few weeks that I think you should have one of these. I know how much work there can be in verifiying hooks so I really think you have earned it! [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 07:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269850 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269849 +++$+++ 269849 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.239569640E09 +++$+++ Thank you for noticing! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you for noticing! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269851 +++$+++ JamieS93 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269849 +++$+++ 269850 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.239590040E09 +++$+++ I came here to say the same thing \u2013 thanks a lot for your continuous work helping with this backlog right now. Getting hooks moved off [[T:TDYK]] and into updates can be the easiest task (heck, I'm doing that right now, although it does need to be done). But verifying and commenting is the thankless, tiring job that really keeps DYK going. We really appreciate it. ''':)'''  +++$+++ ::I came here to say the same thing – thanks a lot for your continuous work helping with this backlog right now. Getting hooks moved off [[T:TDYK]] and into updates can be the easiest task (heck, I'm doing that right now, although it does need to be done). But verifying and commenting is the thankless, tiring job that really keeps DYK going. We really appreciate it. ''':)''' [[User:JamieS93|'''<font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size="2px" color="green">Jamie</font>''']]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/JamieS93|☆]]</sup>[[User talk:JamieS93|'''<font face="Bradley Hand ITC" size="2px" color="blue">S93</font>''']] 19:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269852 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269849 +++$+++ 269851 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.239590220E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I feel very rewarded. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Thank you! I feel very rewarded. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

7708 +++$+++ Wereldburger758 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-11 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.289489280E09 +++$+++ You use the abbreviation WPMOS on your request on the Graphic Map Lab [[Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab\/Map_workshop# Antartica]]. What does it mean?  +++$+++ You use the abbreviation WPMOS on your request on the Graphic Map Lab [[Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab/Map_workshop# Antartica]]. What does it mean? [[User:Wereldburger758|Wereldburger758]] ([[User talk:Wereldburger758|talk]]) 07:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
7709 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7708 +++$+++ 7708 +++$+++ 2010-11-11 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.289490660E09 +++$+++ Hi World Citizen! It stands for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]].-- +++$+++ :Hi World Citizen! It stands for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]].--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 07:51, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

269853 +++$+++ Cornucopia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269853 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-12 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.239568740E09 +++$+++ Hey there. Could you please read my response at the nom. page? Thanks. :) '''<font face=\"verdana\"> +++$+++ Hey there. Could you please read my response at the nom. page? Thanks. :) '''<font face="verdana">[[User:Cornucopia|<span style="color: Orangered">Corn.u.</span><span style="color: crimson">co.pia</span>]] • [[User talk:Cornucopia|<span style="color: Teal">Disc.u</span><span style="color: Seagreen">s.sion</span>]]</font>''' 13:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269854 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269853 +++$+++ 269853 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.239569700E09 +++$+++ Will do! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Will do! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:55, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269855 +++$+++ Cornucopia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269853 +++$+++ 269854 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.239576720E09 +++$+++ Hey again. Please check back, because hopefully the problem has been solved. :) '''<font face=\"verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Hey again. Please check back, because hopefully the problem has been solved. :) '''<font face="verdana">[[User:Cornucopia|<span style="color: Orangered">Corn.u.</span><span style="color: crimson">co.pia</span>]] • [[User talk:Cornucopia|<span style="color: Teal">Disc.u</span><span style="color: Seagreen">s.sion</span>]]</font>''' 15:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269856 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269853 +++$+++ 269855 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.239578520E09 +++$+++ OK.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::OK.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269857 +++$+++ Cornucopia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269853 +++$+++ 269856 +++$+++ 2009-04-13 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.239608040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for all your help; it's much appreciated (and you certainly deserve that barnstar above!). :) '''<font face=\"verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::Thanks for all your help; it's much appreciated (and you certainly deserve that barnstar above!). :) '''<font face="verdana">[[User:Cornucopia|<span style="color: Orangered">Corn.u.</span><span style="color: crimson">co.pia</span>]] • [[User talk:Cornucopia|<span style="color: Teal">Disc.u</span><span style="color: Seagreen">s.sion</span>]]</font>''' 00:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
269858 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269853 +++$+++ 269857 +++$+++ 2009-04-13 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.239609360E09 +++$+++ You are welcome! And thanks!  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::You are welcome! And thanks!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

7710 +++$+++ Durero +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-11 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.289529120E09 +++$+++ A lot of articles use [[File:Flag of New Spain]] and now the file is missing. You must arrange it. Thanks.  +++$+++ A lot of articles use [[File:Flag of New Spain]] and now the file is missing. You must arrange it. Thanks. [[User:Durero|Durero]] ([[User talk:Durero|talk]]) 18:32, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
7711 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7710 +++$+++ 7710 +++$+++ 2010-11-12 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.289557980E09 +++$+++ Please see http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File_talk:Flag_of_New_Spain.svg .-- +++$+++ :Please see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Flag_of_New_Spain.svg .--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 02:33, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

7712 +++$+++ Naraht +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7712 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-19 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.290220080E09 +++$+++ While I have interests in both scouting and Asia (I was a scout, am an [[Alpha Phi Omega]] historian, lived in Taiwan for two years and [[Alpha Phi Omega]] also exists in the Philippines), the area where I am most comfortable is filling in tables of events like National Fraternity Conventions and Jamborees. The information on jamborees for the Interamerican Zone seems fairly complete, to the point where I wonder if [[User:Inauditous]] got the rest from a single site (which should be referenced). BTW, the phrase \"Even today, the Interamerican Region exists more for the benefit of countries south of the Rio Grande, as evidenced by the website being only in Spanish; consequently, the United States and Canada do not participate as vigorously in regional activities as do other national organizations around the world.\" seems inappropriate for wikipedia. +++$+++ While I have interests in both scouting and Asia (I was a scout, am an [[Alpha Phi Omega]] historian, lived in Taiwan for two years and [[Alpha Phi Omega]] also exists in the Philippines), the area where I am most comfortable is filling in tables of events like National Fraternity Conventions and Jamborees. The information on jamborees for the Interamerican Zone seems fairly complete, to the point where I wonder if [[User:Inauditous]] got the rest from a single site (which should be referenced). BTW, the phrase "Even today, the Interamerican Region exists more for the benefit of countries south of the Rio Grande, as evidenced by the website being only in Spanish; consequently, the United States and Canada do not participate as vigorously in regional activities as do other national organizations around the world." seems inappropriate for wikipedia.[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 18:28, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
7713 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7712 +++$+++ 7712 +++$+++ 2010-11-19 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.290220980E09 +++$+++ Ps-how was Taiwan? Everyone suggests to go there, it's friendly but humid, apparently.-- +++$+++ :Ps-how was Taiwan? Everyone suggests to go there, it's friendly but humid, apparently.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 18:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
7714 +++$+++ Naraht +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7712 +++$+++ 7713 +++$+++ 2010-11-20 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.290245460E09 +++$+++ I liked Taiwan, definitely humid. It is about half way between Miami and Havana in Latitude I think. It has been 20 years since I was there... +++$+++ ::I liked Taiwan, definitely humid. It is about half way between Miami and Havana in Latitude I think. It has been 20 years since I was there...[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 01:31, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

532001 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-01 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.157121360E09 +++$+++ Bi li ti bio problem popri\u010dati malo sa [[User:Hahahihihoho]]? On ne shva\u0107a da na Wikipediji ne mo\u017ee\u0161 pisati ono \u0161to ti smatra\u0161 da je istina nego ono za \u0161ta ima\u0161 dokaze. Tako da uporno stavlja u \u010dlanak o Sarajevu informaciju da Sarajevo ima 500.000 stanovnika, a po zadnjem popisu Sarajevo ima 308.558 stavnika. On tvrdi da je bio i u Sarajevu i u Zagrebu i da Sarajevo nije duplo manje od Zagreba, dakle Sarajevo mora imati 500.000. Za nas koji mu obja\u0161njavamo da postoji ne\u0161to \u0161to se zove popis stanovni\u0161tva i da je taj podatak relevantan on ka\u017ee da mrzimo Muslimane i da smo prokleti Hrvati koji vr\u0161e propagandu na Wikipediji. Bi li tebi, kao Bo\u0161njaku bio problem ostaviti mu kakvu poruku na talk pageu i zamoliti ga da pi\u0161e samo ono za \u0161ta ima dokaze? Jer, bojim se da \u0107e ga netko od admina blokirati, a to nebi bilo dobro jer \u0107e se onda on raspizdit pa \u0107e tek onda po\u010det radit sranja po Wikipediji... -- +++$+++ Bi li ti bio problem popričati malo sa [[User:Hahahihihoho]]? On ne shvaća da na Wikipediji ne možeš pisati ono što ti smatraš da je istina nego ono za šta imaš dokaze. Tako da uporno stavlja u članak o Sarajevu informaciju da Sarajevo ima 500.000 stanovnika, a po zadnjem popisu Sarajevo ima 308.558 stavnika. On tvrdi da je bio i u Sarajevu i u Zagrebu i da Sarajevo nije duplo manje od Zagreba, dakle Sarajevo mora imati 500.000. Za nas koji mu objašnjavamo da postoji nešto što se zove popis stanovništva i da je taj podatak relevantan on kaže da mrzimo Muslimane i da smo prokleti Hrvati koji vrše propagandu na Wikipediji. Bi li tebi, kao Bošnjaku bio problem ostaviti mu kakvu poruku na talk pageu i zamoliti ga da piše samo ono za šta ima dokaze? Jer, bojim se da će ga netko od admina blokirati, a to nebi bilo dobro jer će se onda on raspizdit pa će tek onda počet radit sranja po Wikipediji... --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 07:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
532002 +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532001 +++$+++ 532001 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.157247960E09 +++$+++ Who is this? Why do you want my MSN messenger? Just tell me who you are and I will give you it. Greetings,  +++$+++ :Who is this? Why do you want my MSN messenger? Just tell me who you are and I will give you it. Greetings, [[User:Kseferovic|Kseferovic]] 18:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

269859 +++$+++ 82.33.48.96 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269859 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-12 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.239605160E09 +++$+++ You're an experienced editor.  You must know that vandalism ONLY refers to edits that are wilfully destructive.  An editor who is making an attempt to improve the encyclopedia, no matter how badly they do it, is not a vandal, and MUST NOT be called a vandal.  With that in mind do you want to reconsider your unfriendly welcome to 207.6.206.218?  New editors are unlikely to realise that trigger happy editors who don't check the output of their scripts are slapping inappropriate templated warnings everywhere.  Maybe it's too late?  Maybe that IP editor is gone, and will never make any edits again. [[Special:Contributions\/82.33.48.96|82.33.48.96]] ( +++$+++ You're an experienced editor.  You must know that vandalism ONLY refers to edits that are wilfully destructive.  An editor who is making an attempt to improve the encyclopedia, no matter how badly they do it, is not a vandal, and MUST NOT be called a vandal.  With that in mind do you want to reconsider your unfriendly welcome to 207.6.206.218?  New editors are unlikely to realise that trigger happy editors who don't check the output of their scripts are slapping inappropriate templated warnings everywhere.  Maybe it's too late?  Maybe that IP editor is gone, and will never make any edits again. [[Special:Contributions/82.33.48.96|82.33.48.96]] ([[User talk:82.33.48.96|talk]]) 23:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269860 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269859 +++$+++ 269859 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.239605640E09 +++$+++ Sure. I'm very willing never to leave another warning. I only do it out of a sense of duty, but I will stop. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Sure. I'm very willing never to leave another warning. I only do it out of a sense of duty, but I will stop. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

269861 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269861 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-13 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.239677400E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to point out that the purpose of my DYK query was to find out what the community thought plus see what they expected out of the articles - what would the expansion be, what pages would need it, how would it be divided, etc. It is a problem with old articles that combined multiple notable subjects without giving them their own separate pages. I am not concerned with the specific amount, but I do want people to come to a general agreement on whatever so I know how to proceed.  +++$+++ I just wanted to point out that the purpose of my DYK query was to find out what the community thought plus see what they expected out of the articles - what would the expansion be, what pages would need it, how would it be divided, etc. It is a problem with old articles that combined multiple notable subjects without giving them their own separate pages. I am not concerned with the specific amount, but I do want people to come to a general agreement on whatever so I know how to proceed. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 19:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
269862 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269861 +++$+++ 269861 +++$+++ 2009-04-13 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.239678060E09 +++$+++ That's OK. I'm just an old timer who remembers the days when DYK was more informal and when there were not so many editors seriously racking up points. Nothing depends on what I think. It seems that the general DYK community of tolerant of the increasing DYK complexity and the \"advertising\" use of DYK by experienced editors, so that is what is important. I am just one editor.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :That's OK. I'm just an old timer who remembers the days when DYK was more informal and when there were not so many editors seriously racking up points. Nothing depends on what I think. It seems that the general DYK community of tolerant of the increasing DYK complexity and the "advertising" use of DYK by experienced editors, so that is what is important. I am just one editor.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
269863 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269861 +++$+++ 269862 +++$+++ 2009-04-13 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.239679200E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I've been around DYK for a long time. I put it on the talk page because I don't \"rack up points\" and that I just want things to go through without having the problems that happened back in November when the community decision wasn't clear.  +++$+++ ::Mattisse, I've been around DYK for a long time. I put it on the talk page because I don't "rack up points" and that I just want things to go through without having the problems that happened back in November when the community decision wasn't clear. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 20:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

532007 +++$+++ Crism +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532007 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-06 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.157535600E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Image talk:Iron Curtain (Correction-2).PNG]]\u2014pick public domain (no copyright) or GFDL, but you can\u2019t have both. \u2014 +++$+++ Please see [[Image talk:Iron Curtain (Correction-2).PNG]]—pick public domain (no copyright) or GFDL, but you can’t have both. —[[User:Crism|crism]] 02:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
532008 +++$+++ Ulflarsen +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532007 +++$+++ 532007 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.159359600E09 +++$+++ Hi, great map of the \"Iron curtain\", have used it on the Norwegian Wikipedia article about the same. One question though, could it be made larger? I have it as a thumb, but I guess it could be useful to have a larger version also... Keep up the good work!  +++$+++ :Hi, great map of the "Iron curtain", have used it on the Norwegian Wikipedia article about the same. One question though, could it be made larger? I have it as a thumb, but I guess it could be useful to have a larger version also... Keep up the good work! [[User:Ulflarsen|Ulflarsen]] 05:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

7720 +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-07 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.291781100E09 +++$+++ No problem. This made more sense to me because the SCG page now described a comparatively minor part of the complete history. The main question now is how much of the SCG page was generic, i.e. how much of it also applied in the 1950-1991 period too, not just 1995-2006. Those parts should be moved to a higher header level. -- +++$+++ No problem. This made more sense to me because the SCG page now described a comparatively minor part of the complete history. The main question now is how much of the SCG page was generic, i.e. how much of it also applied in the 1950-1991 period too, not just 1995-2006. Those parts should be moved to a higher header level. --[[User:Joy|Joy &#91;shallot&#93;]] ([[User talk:Joy|talk]]) 20:05, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
7721 +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7720 +++$+++ 7720 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.291781460E09 +++$+++ Oh, I'm so sorry to hear that. Well, it'll be pretty straightforward to work on this for someone who actually knows anything about these guys. I have no idea about scouting, I just did this to help clear out the obsolete category [[:Category:Organizations based in Serbia and Montenegro]] :) -- +++$+++ : Oh, I'm so sorry to hear that. Well, it'll be pretty straightforward to work on this for someone who actually knows anything about these guys. I have no idea about scouting, I just did this to help clear out the obsolete category [[:Category:Organizations based in Serbia and Montenegro]] :) --[[User:Joy|Joy &#91;shallot&#93;]] ([[User talk:Joy|talk]]) 20:11, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

269866 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-11 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.239483780E09 +++$+++ I've finished construction work and nommed for GA.  I'll continue to polish it, but I think it is turning out really well, better than I expected.  The thing is, it is an unusual structure and some may think it overdetailed, but as we are dealing with, in effect, a ten day period, I think a detailed article is needed to assure the reader understands the intricacies of what went on; it is a coherent story and is an important article, everyone from then on saw Nixon through the filter of the speech, for good or bad.  I have Nixon's book, ''Six Crises'', in which he discusses the Fund crisis in detail, on order.-- +++$+++ I've finished construction work and nommed for GA.  I'll continue to polish it, but I think it is turning out really well, better than I expected.  The thing is, it is an unusual structure and some may think it overdetailed, but as we are dealing with, in effect, a ten day period, I think a detailed article is needed to assure the reader understands the intricacies of what went on; it is a coherent story and is an important article, everyone from then on saw Nixon through the filter of the speech, for good or bad.  I have Nixon's book, ''Six Crises'', in which he discusses the Fund crisis in detail, on order.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 14:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
269867 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269866 +++$+++ 269866 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.239522660E09 +++$+++ I would wade in and review it, except without the discipline of FAC you will disregard all my suggestions! (I know this from experience.) I see big things right away that are wrong with the article. &mdash; +++$+++ :I would wade in and review it, except without the discipline of FAC you will disregard all my suggestions! (I know this from experience.) I see big things right away that are wrong with the article. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269868 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269866 +++$+++ 269867 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.239535680E09 +++$+++ I tend to revert you on word choice more than anything else, sometimes I include a word for a very specific reason and you aren't aware of this (how could you be) and you replace with a synonym.  I don't think we tend to disagree on \"big picture\" items.  Why don't you tell me what the major problems you see are here, and then we can go on from there?-- +++$+++ ::I tend to revert you on word choice more than anything else, sometimes I include a word for a very specific reason and you aren't aware of this (how could you be) and you replace with a synonym.  I don't think we tend to disagree on "big picture" items.  Why don't you tell me what the major problems you see are here, and then we can go on from there?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 04:28, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269869 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269866 +++$+++ 269868 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.239569400E09 +++$+++ For one, the use of all caps is strictly forbidden by MoS.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::For one, the use of all caps is strictly forbidden by MoS.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269870 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269866 +++$+++ 269869 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.239588600E09 +++$+++ I've decapitated that.  Next?-- +++$+++ ::::I've decapitated that.  Next?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 19:10, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269871 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269866 +++$+++ 269866 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.239604740E09 +++$+++ \" ... discussions between his campaign staff and his longtime California backers resulted in a privately-run fund ...\". Are you saying that Nixon did not know about this, had no input etc.? Weaselly.   &mdash; +++$+++ *" ... discussions between his campaign staff and his longtime California backers resulted in a privately-run fund ...". Are you saying that Nixon did not know about this, had no input etc.? Weaselly.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
269872 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269866 +++$+++ 269871 +++$+++ 2009-04-12 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.239605460E09 +++$+++ :Good point.  I've consulted the Morris book and made it clearer.  Of course, Nixon had to know, he cashed the checks from the Fund, didn't he?-- +++$+++ *:Good point.  I've consulted the Morris book and made it clearer.  Of course, Nixon had to know, he cashed the checks from the Fund, didn't he?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 23:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

7725 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7725 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-15 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.292414460E09 +++$+++ Thank you for adding a fair use rationale to this image.  However, it is tolerably clear from [http:\/\/www.alynepustanio.com\/DELPHINELALAURIE.php this site] that the image was painted in recent years, is still under copyright, and holds no claim of accurately depicting its subject.  I have amended the image's description accordingly, awaiting its pending deletion. -  +++$+++ Thank you for adding a fair use rationale to this image.  However, it is tolerably clear from [http://www.alynepustanio.com/DELPHINELALAURIE.php this site] that the image was painted in recent years, is still under copyright, and holds no claim of accurately depicting its subject.  I have amended the image's description accordingly, awaiting its pending deletion. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 04:01, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
7726 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7725 +++$+++ 7725 +++$+++ 2010-12-15 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.292414700E09 +++$+++ Didn't know that. From the site, it looks like the top image was painted from a life photo. Any ideas how we can find that one?-- +++$+++ :Didn't know that. From the site, it looks like the top image was painted from a life photo. Any ideas how we can find that one?--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 04:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
7727 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7725 +++$+++ 7726 +++$+++ 2010-12-15 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.292414700E09 +++$+++ No, but all the editors working on [[Delphine LaLaurie]] would be deeply grateful if you managed it!  (All the relevant results on Google image search trace back to Haunted America Tours or Pustanio.) -  +++$+++ ::No, but all the editors working on [[Delphine LaLaurie]] would be deeply grateful if you managed it!  (All the relevant results on Google image search trace back to Haunted America Tours or Pustanio.) - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 04:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

532014 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-15 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.158389580E09 +++$+++ Pre svega, BIH je po ustavu dr\u017eava tri ravnopravna naroda i srpski jezik u BIH vredi isto koliko i bosanski. Drugo pitanje je na koji na\u010din \u0107emo listati slu\u017ebene jezike BIH. Ti tvrdi\u0161 da bosanski do\u0111e prvi po abecednom redu, ali nigde ne pi\u0161e da moramo koristiti abecedni listing za ovo. Da niko ni u jednom delu BIH ne bi bio uvre\u0111en ovakvim listanjem, onda jezike kod \u010dlanaka o gradovima treba listati tako da odra\u017eavaju jezi\u010dku strukturu samog grada, odnosno prvo ide onaj jezik kojim govori najve\u0107i deo stanovnika grada, pa onda ostali u zavisnosti od broja ljudi koji njime govore. Slede\u0107e, ne vidim razlog za brisanje \u0107irili\u010dnih naziva iz \u010dlanaka o Palama i Bijeljini. I zadnje, ako si ve\u0107 koristio slu\u017ebeni sajt vlade RS u slu\u010daju Bos. Kostajnice i Bos. Broda, za\u0161to ga nisi koristio i u slu\u010daju Kozarske Dubice?  +++$+++ Pre svega, BIH je po ustavu država tri ravnopravna naroda i srpski jezik u BIH vredi isto koliko i bosanski. Drugo pitanje je na koji način ćemo listati službene jezike BIH. Ti tvrdiš da bosanski dođe prvi po abecednom redu, ali nigde ne piše da moramo koristiti abecedni listing za ovo. Da niko ni u jednom delu BIH ne bi bio uvređen ovakvim listanjem, onda jezike kod članaka o gradovima treba listati tako da odražavaju jezičku strukturu samog grada, odnosno prvo ide onaj jezik kojim govori najveći deo stanovnika grada, pa onda ostali u zavisnosti od broja ljudi koji njime govore. Sledeće, ne vidim razlog za brisanje ćiriličnih naziva iz članaka o Palama i Bijeljini. I zadnje, ako si već koristio službeni sajt vlade RS u slučaju Bos. Kostajnice i Bos. Broda, zašto ga nisi koristio i u slučaju Kozarske Dubice? [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 23:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
532015 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532014 +++$+++ 532014 +++$+++ 2006-09-16 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.158432180E09 +++$+++ E, vidi\u0161 postoji u celoj pri\u010di ne\u0161to \u0161to si prevideo: u BIH se dokumenti mogu izdati na bilo kom od tri slu\u017ebena jezika. Ti si tra\u017eio  da ti se dokumenti izdaju na bosanskom i ime Bosanska Dubica\/Kozarska Dubica se o\u010digledno koristi u bosanskom jeziku kao zvani\u010dno ime grada. Da si tra\u017eio isprave na srpskom, tu bi verovatno pisalo samo Kozarska Dubica i to isklju\u010divo \u0107irilicom. Po\u0161to je srpski jezik glavni jezik u gradu, onda za \u010dlanak treba koristiti ono ime koje se koristi u srpskom jeziku. Da\u0107u ti jedan sli\u010dan primer: u Vojvodini se dokumenti tako\u0111e mogu izdati na vi\u0161e slu\u017ebenih jezika, i na osnovu toga, ime grada [[Zrenjanin]] \u0107e u dokumentima na ma\u0111arskom glasiti Nagybecskerek, u dokumentima na rumunskom Becicherecul Mare, itd, itd. Me\u0111utim, to ne zna\u010di da su ovo glavna imena za taj grad.  +++$+++ :E, vidiš postoji u celoj priči nešto što si prevideo: u BIH se dokumenti mogu izdati na bilo kom od tri službena jezika. Ti si tražio  da ti se dokumenti izdaju na bosanskom i ime Bosanska Dubica/Kozarska Dubica se očigledno koristi u bosanskom jeziku kao zvanično ime grada. Da si tražio isprave na srpskom, tu bi verovatno pisalo samo Kozarska Dubica i to isključivo ćirilicom. Pošto je srpski jezik glavni jezik u gradu, onda za članak treba koristiti ono ime koje se koristi u srpskom jeziku. Daću ti jedan sličan primer: u Vojvodini se dokumenti takođe mogu izdati na više službenih jezika, i na osnovu toga, ime grada [[Zrenjanin]] će u dokumentima na mađarskom glasiti Nagybecskerek, u dokumentima na rumunskom Becicherecul Mare, itd, itd. Međutim, to ne znači da su ovo glavna imena za taj grad. [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 11:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
532016 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532014 +++$+++ 532015 +++$+++ 2006-09-16 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.158433500E09 +++$+++ A isti slu\u010daj je i ovde: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bijeljina&diff=75823147&oldid=75374353 Dakle, tu se opet radi o dokumentima na bosanskom, jer u dokumentima na srpskom latini\u010dno ime sigurno ne stoji prvo (ako tamo ime uop\u0161te i pi\u0161e latinicom).  +++$+++ ::A isti slučaj je i ovde: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bijeljina&diff=75823147&oldid=75374353 Dakle, tu se opet radi o dokumentima na bosanskom, jer u dokumentima na srpskom latinično ime sigurno ne stoji prvo (ako tamo ime uopšte i piše latinicom). [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 12:05, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
532017 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532014 +++$+++ 532014 +++$+++ 2006-09-16 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.158437280E09 +++$+++ Also, how did the Bosnian nation exist for over 1500 years? -- +++$+++ :Also, how did the Bosnian nation exist for over 1500 years? --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 13:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

7729 +++$+++ Begoon +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7729 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-16 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.292553780E09 +++$+++ Well, I did... Go figure that which is me, if you like...) &nbsp; +++$+++ Well, I did... Go figure that which is me, if you like...) &nbsp;[[User:Begoon|<font face="Arial" color="#0645AD">'''Begoon'''</font>]]&#149;[[User Talk:Begoon|<font style="color:#808080;font-weight:bold;">talk</font>]] 18:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
7730 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7729 +++$+++ 7729 +++$+++ 2010-12-16 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.292568540E09 +++$+++ I've missed you and I look forward to your return!-- +++$+++ :I've missed you and I look forward to your return!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 22:49, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

532018 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-16 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.158462900E09 +++$+++ Ja lomim svoje kosti za drugu dr\u017eavu, a? Pa ja bar \u017eivim u susednoj dr\u017eavi, za razliku od tebe koji si Amerikanac. Ako ba\u0161 ho\u0107e\u0161 da zna\u0161, zabole me ona stvar kako se taj grad zove, samo ne volim kad neko kao ti ho\u0107e da progura ime koje se njemu vi\u0161e svi\u0111a, a ne \u017eeli da utvrdi da li je to ime najprikladnije ili ne. Nemam uop\u0161te vi\u0161e nameru da dalje diskutujem sa tobom o tome. Napi\u0161i koje god \u017eeli\u0161 ime za taj \u010dlanak, ali jednom \u0107e\u0161 shvatiti da Vikipedija nije mesto za politi\u010dku propagandu (oni koji odlu\u010duju o politi\u010dkim pitanjima ionako ne uzimaju podatke sa Vikipedije), ve\u0107 mesto gde treba stvari predstaviti onakvim kakve jesu.  +++$+++ Ja lomim svoje kosti za drugu državu, a? Pa ja bar živim u susednoj državi, za razliku od tebe koji si Amerikanac. Ako baš hoćeš da znaš, zabole me ona stvar kako se taj grad zove, samo ne volim kad neko kao ti hoće da progura ime koje se njemu više sviđa, a ne želi da utvrdi da li je to ime najprikladnije ili ne. Nemam uopšte više nameru da dalje diskutujem sa tobom o tome. Napiši koje god želiš ime za taj članak, ali jednom ćeš shvatiti da Vikipedija nije mesto za političku propagandu (oni koji odlučuju o političkim pitanjima ionako ne uzimaju podatke sa Vikipedije), već mesto gde treba stvari predstaviti onakvim kakve jesu. [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 20:15, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
532019 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532018 +++$+++ 532018 +++$+++ 2006-09-16 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.158466620E09 +++$+++ Tvrtko was a Roman Catholic Christian Bosnian of German origin, who prided himself on his (partial) Serb origin. He was partly of Croat origin as well. What I meant is that ''the Yugoslav nation'' existd before - and that the Bosnian nation has been created in 1992, and finally formalized in 1995 - with still lacking a lot of shapes of a single, unified nation. -- +++$+++ :Tvrtko was a Roman Catholic Christian Bosnian of German origin, who prided himself on his (partial) Serb origin. He was partly of Croat origin as well. What I meant is that ''the Yugoslav nation'' existd before - and that the Bosnian nation has been created in 1992, and finally formalized in 1995 - with still lacking a lot of shapes of a single, unified nation. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 21:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

7731 +++$+++ Jergen +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-20 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.292908860E09 +++$+++ Are you sure that this organization really exists? I couldn't find anything except the ebay offer by a spanish ebay trader. It could be a scam; the fleur-de-lis was taken from Wikipedia. Is there any other proof of the existence of these groups? -- +++$+++ Are you sure that this organization really exists? I couldn't find anything except the ebay offer by a spanish ebay trader. It could be a scam; the fleur-de-lis was taken from Wikipedia. Is there any other proof of the existence of these groups? --[[User:Jergen|jergen]] ([[User talk:Jergen|talk]]) 21:21, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
7732 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.292919720E09 +++$+++ That the fleur-de-lis was taken from Wikipedia is what drew my attention to it-somebody ''does'' read us! ;) It is too elaborate to be a hoax, with the attention to detail; in addition, I have known that seller for 18 years, he's (or was) head of the International Badgers Club Spanish Tejones, so while I don't have proof, I am taking it on good faith. Mostly I was impressed that someone chose to use our design.-- +++$+++ :That the fleur-de-lis was taken from Wikipedia is what drew my attention to it-somebody ''does'' read us! ;) It is too elaborate to be a hoax, with the attention to detail; in addition, I have known that seller for 18 years, he's (or was) head of the International Badgers Club Spanish Tejones, so while I don't have proof, I am taking it on good faith. Mostly I was impressed that someone chose to use our design.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 00:22, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
7733 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.293002580E09 +++$+++ I didn't bring his contact info with me to Japan-I will do some searching for it.-- +++$+++ :I didn't bring his contact info with me to Japan-I will do some searching for it.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 23:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
7734 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.293002580E09 +++$+++ Not so fast-anybody practicing that religion might know those symbols-I would argue the triangles and the little gold effigy one you pointed me to could be gotten from any source. You know way more about the religion than I do-I didn't even know what to call some of those, but it doesn't follow they got those here-a Google search would do.-- +++$+++ :Not so fast-anybody practicing that religion might know those symbols-I would argue the triangles and the little gold effigy one you pointed me to could be gotten from any source. You know way more about the religion than I do-I didn't even know what to call some of those, but it doesn't follow they got those here-a Google search would do.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 23:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
7735 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.293002580E09 +++$+++ That is a good series of questions and I appreciate your legwork on this. It could also be that there are believers who are not registered with a church or org-I am that way (different religion though), so probably I am not counted as a member.-- +++$+++ :That is a good series of questions and I appreciate your legwork on this. It could also be that there are believers who are not registered with a church or org-I am that way (different religion though), so probably I am not counted as a member.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 23:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
7736 +++$+++ Jergen +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 7735 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.292952780E09 +++$+++ And why is there a separate organization in the US with BSA accepting Asatru units (eg former Troop 1239; Great Salt Lake Council)? -- +++$+++ :: And why is there a separate organization in the US with BSA accepting Asatru units (eg former Troop 1239; Great Salt Lake Council)? --[[User:Jergen|jergen]] ([[User talk:Jergen|talk]]) 09:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
7737 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 7736 +++$+++ 2010-12-23 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.293121200E09 +++$+++ That's a question for Egel-that was not information I had, and I don't know if that counts as Scouting.-- +++$+++ :::That's a question for Egel-that was not information I had, and I don't know if that counts as Scouting.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 08:20, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
7738 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.293002580E09 +++$+++ I'll do my best, thanks for your hard work!-- +++$+++ :I'll do my best, thanks for your hard work!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 23:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
7739 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 7738 +++$+++ 2010-12-22 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.293053640E09 +++$+++ ps-Jergen, do you know what the really complex red one is? I wanna take a look at that. To me it doesn't look like anything similar to the other ones.-- +++$+++ ::ps-Jergen, do you know what the really complex red one is? I wanna take a look at that. To me it doesn't look like anything similar to the other ones.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 13:34, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
7740 +++$+++ Phips +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7731 +++$+++ 7739 +++$+++ 2010-12-24 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.293221340E09 +++$+++ Merry Christmas, Happy Holydays and Happy New Year. Yours in Scouting- +++$+++ :::Merry Christmas, Happy Holydays and Happy New Year. Yours in Scouting-[[User:Phips|Phips]] ([[User talk:Phips|talk]]) 12:09, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

532021 +++$+++ Cordless Larry +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-28 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.159478820E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I was wondering if you had any thoughts about setting up a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] for Bosnia? I'm torn between thinking that it would be a good way of improving the quality of articles on Bosnia on the one had, and that it might just end up another place for the kind of arguments that regularly flare up around Bosnia articles on the other. Thoughts\/suggestions\/help would be appreciated. Hvala.  +++$+++ Hi there. I was wondering if you had any thoughts about setting up a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] for Bosnia? I'm torn between thinking that it would be a good way of improving the quality of articles on Bosnia on the one had, and that it might just end up another place for the kind of arguments that regularly flare up around Bosnia articles on the other. Thoughts/suggestions/help would be appreciated. Hvala. [[User:Cordless Larry|Cordless Larry]] 14:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
532022 +++$+++ Cordless Larry +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532021 +++$+++ 532021 +++$+++ 2006-10-02 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.159804440E09 +++$+++ I see you've set up the project. That's great. I'm rather busy with other things at the moment, but I'll try to contribute as much as possible when I get the time.  +++$+++ :I see you've set up the project. That's great. I'm rather busy with other things at the moment, but I'll try to contribute as much as possible when I get the time. [[User:Cordless Larry|Cordless Larry]] 08:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

263433 +++$+++ Dr.Boogins +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263433 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-04 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.146807420E09 +++$+++ Can I have an explaination for why you deleted my Ruadhri Conroy page?. -- +++$+++ Can I have an explaination for why you deleted my Ruadhri Conroy page?. --[[User:Dr.Boogins|Dr.Boogins]] 22:37, 04 May 2006 (UTC)
263434 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263433 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.146804240E09 +++$+++ IIRC, it was an 'article' about a non-notable person with a massive photo in the middle of it.  +++$+++ **IIRC, it was an 'article' about a non-notable person with a massive photo in the middle of it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

269883 +++$+++ Arcayne +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-15 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.239862680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reference assistance. I surely do appreciate it. I was kinda goaded into writing the article, which took about 3-4 hours to write-n'-cite. I would have converted them eventually, but I figured that having it come up as a DYK would bring a lot of hands to the article. mooting the necessity. Thanks for the help, though! :) -  +++$+++ Thanks for the reference assistance. I surely do appreciate it. I was kinda goaded into writing the article, which took about 3-4 hours to write-n'-cite. I would have converted them eventually, but I figured that having it come up as a DYK would bring a lot of hands to the article. mooting the necessity. Thanks for the help, though! :) - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 23:18, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
269884 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269883 +++$+++ 269883 +++$+++ 2009-04-15 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.239862980E09 +++$+++ It's an interesting little article, and the first one I have seen to use podcasts! Glad to do it. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :It's an interesting little article, and the first one I have seen to use podcasts! Glad to do it. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

532028 +++$+++ Estavisti +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532028 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-19 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.161249840E09 +++$+++ Mislim, cenim \u0161to si se izvinio, znam da svi ponekad ka\u017eemo ne\u0161to \u0161to nije ba\u0161 dobro shva\u0107eno, ili nismo tako mislili. No hard feelings, OK? E da, ima\u0161 li emesen? -- +++$+++ Mislim, cenim što si se izvinio, znam da svi ponekad kažemo nešto što nije baš dobro shvaćeno, ili nismo tako mislili. No hard feelings, OK? E da, imaš li emesen? --[[User:Estavisti|estavisti]] 02:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
532029 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532028 +++$+++ 532028 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 08:50:00 +++$+++ 1.161273000E09 +++$+++ heh - he got ''a formal'' invitation and I didn't. :( -- +++$+++ :heh - he got ''a formal'' invitation and I didn't. :( --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 08:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

269885 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-16 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.239884760E09 +++$+++ After a quick skim through, I think the only section that ''might'' be over-laudatory is \"critical reception\", and that depends on what the sources say and whether the article omits reviews that were less positive or contained criticisms among the praise. The material about the concept naturally contains a lot of the creator's views, that's inevitable. The description of the production includes conflicts with the record company and Maxwell's contributions to these. If I were reviewing, I'd look at the cited reviews and Google to see if there are others. If that research finds no less positive notes, then I think the tone is acceptable. -- +++$+++ After a quick skim through, I think the only section that ''might'' be over-laudatory is "critical reception", and that depends on what the sources say and whether the article omits reviews that were less positive or contained criticisms among the praise. The material about the concept naturally contains a lot of the creator's views, that's inevitable. The description of the production includes conflicts with the record company and Maxwell's contributions to these. If I were reviewing, I'd look at the cited reviews and Google to see if there are others. If that research finds no less positive notes, then I think the tone is acceptable. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 05:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
269886 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269885 +++$+++ 269885 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.239909540E09 +++$+++ Great! Thanks. I like the editor's writing and have passed his work before. So I am happy to get this go ahead! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Great! Thanks. I like the editor's writing and have passed his work before. So I am happy to get this go ahead! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:19, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

7743 +++$+++ Hugahoody +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-27 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.293487620E09 +++$+++ Hello, since a lot of images tagged for conversion to PNG are your own, is there any way you could convert the originals from your collection and upload them in PNG form?  +++$+++ Hello, since a lot of images tagged for conversion to PNG are your own, is there any way you could convert the originals from your collection and upload them in PNG form? [[User:Hugahoody|Hugahoody]] ([[User talk:Hugahoody|talk]]) 14:07, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
7744 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7743 +++$+++ 7743 +++$+++ 2010-12-27 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.293520380E09 +++$+++ I'm 6,000 miles away from the originals, having moved to Japan.-- +++$+++ :I'm 6,000 miles away from the originals, having moved to Japan.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 23:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

532034 +++$+++ Bmaganti +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-21 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.161417540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Bmaganti|Bmaganti]] 00:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
532035 +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532034 +++$+++ 532034 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.161430320E09 +++$+++ So everyone else knows, it is userBmaganti who has stopped contributing, not me.  +++$+++ :So everyone else knows, it is userBmaganti who has stopped contributing, not me. [[User:Kseferovic|Vseferović]] 04:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

525579 +++$+++ DMLudwinski +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-13 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.197589020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:DMLudwinski|DMLudwinski]] ([[User talk:DMLudwinski|talk]]) 15:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
525580 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525579 +++$+++ 525579 +++$+++ 2007-12-13 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.197593040E09 +++$+++ There are a few different issues going on here, and they will be easier to address if split. First, I want to thank you for your comments at [[Talk:Neuroblastoma]]. That was sufficient to allow me to find the journal article you were talking about, and add a reference to it. It sounds like you're familiar with the literature, and so I'd encourage you to expand what I wrote. For the external links issue, I agree that there is a concern, but I'd recommend getting additional outside input, since I've already repeatedly used semi-protection on that article without success, and when that happens, it's better to establish a consensus before moving on to hard-blocks. I'd recommend reporting the issue to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam]], and\/or [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine]]. -- +++$+++ :There are a few different issues going on here, and they will be easier to address if split. First, I want to thank you for your comments at [[Talk:Neuroblastoma]]. That was sufficient to allow me to find the journal article you were talking about, and add a reference to it. It sounds like you're familiar with the literature, and so I'd encourage you to expand what I wrote. For the external links issue, I agree that there is a concern, but I'd recommend getting additional outside input, since I've already repeatedly used semi-protection on that article without success, and when that happens, it's better to establish a consensus before moving on to hard-blocks. I'd recommend reporting the issue to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam]], and/or [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 16:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

269892 +++$+++ Sticky Parkin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-17 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.239997080E09 +++$+++ Ooh, thanks for your suggestion.  I just woke up lol.  I asked LS if s\/he was interested in being adopted by me, then I looked on ANI and saw others had already said they would do it.  So they have plenty of people willing to lend them a hand now.:)  +++$+++ Ooh, thanks for your suggestion.  I just woke up lol.  I asked LS if s/he was interested in being adopted by me, then I looked on ANI and saw others had already said they would do it.  So they have plenty of people willing to lend them a hand now.:) [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 12:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
269893 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269892 +++$+++ 269892 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.239999600E09 +++$+++ You might still keep an eye on LS, as that person seems to get things wrong, although at other times sounds perfectly reasonable. Thanks for looking into it. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :You might still keep an eye on LS, as that person seems to get things wrong, although at other times sounds perfectly reasonable. Thanks for looking into it. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

7749 +++$+++ 御門桜 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-12 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.294871700E09 +++$+++ Please expanding it. -- +++$+++ Please expanding it. --[[User:御門桜|御門桜(MIKADO, Sakura)]] ([[User talk:御門桜|talk]]) 14:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
7750 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7749 +++$+++ 7749 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.295433840E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much!-- +++$+++ :Thank you so much!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 02:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

269894 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-17 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.240000800E09 +++$+++ Who hands out the DYK medals?  I should have 26 credits by now, one as a nominator and 25 as a writer\/expander.-- +++$+++ Who hands out the DYK medals?  I should have 26 credits by now, one as a nominator and 25 as a writer/expander.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 13:40, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
269895 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269894 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.240004280E09 +++$+++ Why are you not on this list: [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs]]? For the most part, the DYK people keep track of this, but I have seen some people update their number themselves. You could ask at [[Wikipedia talk:List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs]]. I know my medals came without me doing anything. In fact, I did not even know they existed until I received them. (So you are a numbers collector, eh?) &mdash; +++$+++ :*Why are you not on this list: [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs]]? For the most part, the DYK people keep track of this, but I have seen some people update their number themselves. You could ask at [[Wikipedia talk:List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs]]. I know my medals came without me doing anything. In fact, I did not even know they existed until I received them. (So you are a numbers collector, eh?) &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

7751 +++$+++ 28bytes +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-14 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.295013420E09 +++$+++ I'm not 100% sure if your comment was directed at me or [[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]] (or possibly both of us), but I do want to point out that I did not bring up TPH's edit-warring, even though I noticed it, because as I said at AN\/I, my intention is ''not'' to get TPH blocked. I think the more AN\/I threads he starts about Hullabaloo while simultaneously edit-warring and making insults elsewhere, the more likely it is that an admin is going to get tired of it and block him, which is why I think it's in his best interest and everybody's just to be a little more diligent with these AfD nominations and stay off HW's talk page. That's not an unreasonable suggestion, is it?  +++$+++ I'm not 100% sure if your comment was directed at me or [[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]] (or possibly both of us), but I do want to point out that I did not bring up TPH's edit-warring, even though I noticed it, because as I said at AN/I, my intention is ''not'' to get TPH blocked. I think the more AN/I threads he starts about Hullabaloo while simultaneously edit-warring and making insults elsewhere, the more likely it is that an admin is going to get tired of it and block him, which is why I think it's in his best interest and everybody's just to be a little more diligent with these AfD nominations and stay off HW's talk page. That's not an unreasonable suggestion, is it? [[User:28bytes|28bytes]] ([[User talk:28bytes|talk]]) 05:57, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
7752 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7751 +++$+++ 7751 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 06:16:00 +++$+++ 1.295014560E09 +++$+++ In itself it's not, but why is no one suggesting doing something about HW? TPH doesn't go out of his way to insult people, HW makes it an artform. There's a double-standard there, the level of good editors getting frustrated and leaving has increased while the scab-pickers are coddled. If you honestly are trying to watch out for TPH, thanks, but... making it TPH's issue doesn't address the underlying problem, it just says \"look in the mirror\". Sometimes that's the case, sometimes it's not. I try to avoid editors I dislike, but sometimes they get in my face and won't stop. My sister played the same game when we were kids, I was patient to excess, until she crossed the line and I threw a punch. Of course I became the bad guy and was punished, which is what she wanted all along. It's the same thing. (my sister and I are fine now, 30 years on, thanks) Somebody needs to step in and be dad and send them both to corners, something like a contact ban.-- +++$+++ :In itself it's not, but why is no one suggesting doing something about HW? TPH doesn't go out of his way to insult people, HW makes it an artform. There's a double-standard there, the level of good editors getting frustrated and leaving has increased while the scab-pickers are coddled. If you honestly are trying to watch out for TPH, thanks, but... making it TPH's issue doesn't address the underlying problem, it just says "look in the mirror". Sometimes that's the case, sometimes it's not. I try to avoid editors I dislike, but sometimes they get in my face and won't stop. My sister played the same game when we were kids, I was patient to excess, until she crossed the line and I threw a punch. Of course I became the bad guy and was punished, which is what she wanted all along. It's the same thing. (my sister and I are fine now, 30 years on, thanks) Somebody needs to step in and be dad and send them both to corners, something like a contact ban.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 06:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
7753 +++$+++ 28bytes +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7751 +++$+++ 7752 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.295015220E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm familiar with that childhood game, and yeah, I do see iterations of that around here from time to time. :) Like I said, I think the best way for TPH to avoid HW is to avoid putting up really dodgy XfDs that HW can pounce on, but I've said as much there, so I suppose he'll take that advice or leave it. Anyway, I'll bow out of the AN\/I discussion and leave it to the admins to decide what to do. Best,  +++$+++ ::Yeah, I'm familiar with that childhood game, and yeah, I do see iterations of that around here from time to time. :) Like I said, I think the best way for TPH to avoid HW is to avoid putting up really dodgy XfDs that HW can pounce on, but I've said as much there, so I suppose he'll take that advice or leave it. Anyway, I'll bow out of the AN/I discussion and leave it to the admins to decide what to do. Best, [[User:28bytes|28bytes]] ([[User talk:28bytes|talk]]) 06:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
7754 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7751 +++$+++ 7751 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.295015580E09 +++$+++ Best to you as well. I've been here 5+ years, I wonder if it's time for me to just burn out. I've seen a lot of good people go, and I feel like this is still my baby, but I am so tired of the daily crap. Jimbo has to be feeling the same.-- +++$+++ :Best to you as well. I've been here 5+ years, I wonder if it's time for me to just burn out. I've seen a lot of good people go, and I feel like this is still my baby, but I am so tired of the daily crap. Jimbo has to be feeling the same.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 06:33, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
7755 +++$+++ 28bytes +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7751 +++$+++ 7754 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.295017020E09 +++$+++ Nah, no need to burn out... there are plenty of relatively untouched areas of the 'pedia where one can edit in peace. I'm relatively new as an active editor, although I popped in a couple of times in '06 and '07, so my hat's off to anyone who's been able to keep at it for 5+ years straight.  +++$+++ ::Nah, no need to burn out... there are plenty of relatively untouched areas of the 'pedia where one can edit in peace. I'm relatively new as an active editor, although I popped in a couple of times in '06 and '07, so my hat's off to anyone who's been able to keep at it for 5+ years straight. [[User:28bytes|28bytes]] ([[User talk:28bytes|talk]]) 06:57, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
7756 +++$+++ Naraht +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7751 +++$+++ 7755 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.295035860E09 +++$+++ Amen. +++$+++ :::Amen.[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 12:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

269896 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269896 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-17 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.240017780E09 +++$+++ Hi! Thank you very much for your contribution. Cheers. +++$+++ Hi! Thank you very much for your contribution. Cheers.[[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee|talk]]) 18:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
269897 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269896 +++$+++ 269896 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.240026060E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :You are very welcome! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

269898 +++$+++ Mercurywoodrose +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-17 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.240029300E09 +++$+++ You did some major work on an article i started, [[Bookpeople (distributor)]], on the reference formatting. i am still new to this process, and did what i thought was good work, but i was vaguely aware of a higher level of reference formatting. looks like you did that. i would like to be able to properly reference an article i write, but i know that if i dont do it perfectly, if the information is still good, the article wont be deleted. i did have an article i tried to rescue deleted, which i still think was notable (i may try to introduce the material within another article that it could be a section of). its persons like you which make me much more likely to continue to contribute, and to learn more about how to best do it. thanks, and ill try to read up on referencing. +++$+++ You did some major work on an article i started, [[Bookpeople (distributor)]], on the reference formatting. i am still new to this process, and did what i thought was good work, but i was vaguely aware of a higher level of reference formatting. looks like you did that. i would like to be able to properly reference an article i write, but i know that if i dont do it perfectly, if the information is still good, the article wont be deleted. i did have an article i tried to rescue deleted, which i still think was notable (i may try to introduce the material within another article that it could be a section of). its persons like you which make me much more likely to continue to contribute, and to learn more about how to best do it. thanks, and ill try to read up on referencing.[[User:Mercurywoodrose|Mercurywoodrose]] ([[User talk:Mercurywoodrose|talk]]) 21:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
269899 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269898 +++$+++ 269898 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.240029840E09 +++$+++ It takes a while to get the hang of the referencing format. The fact that there are different formats confuses the issue. I  think [[WP:Cite]] tries to explain. [[Wikipedia:Citation templates]] are helpful templates. There are also some tools that help in the formatting. Feel free to ask me questions. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :It takes a while to get the hang of the referencing format. The fact that there are different formats confuses the issue. I  think [[WP:Cite]] tries to explain. [[Wikipedia:Citation templates]] are helpful templates. There are also some tools that help in the formatting. Feel free to ask me questions. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
269900 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269898 +++$+++ 269899 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.240030140E09 +++$+++ I saw this while passing through. A widget called \"refTools\" is very helpful in formatting references, I use it all the time. See instructions in the \"Tools\" section of my page. -- +++$+++ ::I saw this while passing through. A widget called "refTools" is very helpful in formatting references, I use it all the time. See instructions in the "Tools" section of my page. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 21:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
269901 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269898 +++$+++ 269900 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.240030380E09 +++$+++ Yes, I use it also. It is wonderful! But you have to know about reference formatting before it makes any sense.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Yes, I use it also. It is wonderful! But you have to know about reference formatting before it makes any sense.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
269902 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269898 +++$+++ 269901 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.240031040E09 +++$+++ Now I've told you all I know about refs and I've got a few articles to GA - some passed by Mattisse! -- +++$+++ ::::Now I've told you all I know about refs and I've got a few articles to GA - some passed by Mattisse! --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 22:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
269903 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269898 +++$+++ 269898 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.240031340E09 +++$+++ Well, I am not going to go through that explanation with an editor who is learning to write articles. I just formatted the 23+ or so references in his article. I think he is  learning from that.  &mdash; +++$+++ *Well, I am not going to go through that explanation with an editor who is learning to write articles. I just formatted the 23+ or so references in his article. I think he is  learning from that.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

532043 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.161933540E09 +++$+++ D'ever'ave a thought o' it? ;) -- +++$+++ D'ever'ave a thought o' it? ;) --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 00:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
532044 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532043 +++$+++ 532043 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.161934740E09 +++$+++ Other than that, there's the amount of your edits. Since ''all'' edit counters are malfunctioning, I can't see your contributions. -- +++$+++ :Other than that, there's the amount of your edits. Since ''all'' edit counters are malfunctioning, I can't see your contributions. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 00:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
532045 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532043 +++$+++ 532044 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.161996000E09 +++$+++ I could still nominate you non-the-less... but I still maintain what I said before. -- +++$+++ ::I could still nominate you non-the-less... but I still maintain what I said before. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 17:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

7757 +++$+++ Gryffindor +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7757 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-17 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.295304900E09 +++$+++ could you maybe point out to me who you mean?  +++$+++ could you maybe point out to me who you mean? [[User:Gryffindor|Gryffindor]] ([[User talk:Gryffindor|talk]]) 14:55, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
7758 +++$+++ Gryffindor +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7757 +++$+++ 7757 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.295347920E09 +++$+++ Thank you for pointing that out.  +++$+++ :Thank you for pointing that out. [[User:Gryffindor|Gryffindor]] ([[User talk:Gryffindor|talk]]) 02:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

611291 +++$+++ Mono +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-28 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.293591300E09 +++$+++ You held [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation\/Gina DeVettori]], saying \"This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see tips on how to better format your article.\", yet it clearly establishes context.  +++$+++ You held [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gina DeVettori]], saying "This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see tips on how to better format your article.", yet it clearly establishes context. [[User:Mono|Mono]] ([[User talk:Mono|talk]]) 18:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
611292 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611291 +++$+++ 611291 +++$+++ 2010-12-28 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.293593460E09 +++$+++ I would like to see a bit more information on them in the article, which would suffice as context.  +++$+++ :I would like to see a bit more information on them in the article, which would suffice as context. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 19:31, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

7759 +++$+++ Makeemlighter +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7759 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-18 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.295347980E09 +++$+++ I've fixed the rendering problem per your request. See my comments there. Let me know if there's any further problem. Cheers,  +++$+++ I've fixed the rendering problem per your request. See my comments there. Let me know if there's any further problem. Cheers, [[User:Makeemlighter|Makeemlighter]] ([[User talk:Makeemlighter|talk]]) 02:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
7760 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7759 +++$+++ 7759 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.295433600E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much!-- +++$+++ :Thank you so much!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 02:40, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

269904 +++$+++ Born Gay +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-18 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.240117260E09 +++$+++ Hi, Matisse, I noticed that you recently added the pseudoscience category to the NARTH article. I agree personally that the conversion therapy that NARTH advocates is pseudoscience. However, I still see problems with your edit. As I understand it, the pseudoscience category can only be used if there is general agreement in the scientific community that a topic is pseudoscience, and I don't believe that this is the case here. The NARTH article states that conversion therapy is \"identified by mainstream mental health organizations as a pseudoscience\", however, as far as I can make out, this statement is based on a misinterpreted source, which doesn't actually contain it. There is a discussion about this on the talk page, and I would appreciate it if you could take a look at it and make some comment. I don't want to edit the NARTH article at the moment, let alone get involved in an edit war, but ultimately this edit will have to be reverted if it cannot be justified.  +++$+++ Hi, Matisse, I noticed that you recently added the pseudoscience category to the NARTH article. I agree personally that the conversion therapy that NARTH advocates is pseudoscience. However, I still see problems with your edit. As I understand it, the pseudoscience category can only be used if there is general agreement in the scientific community that a topic is pseudoscience, and I don't believe that this is the case here. The NARTH article states that conversion therapy is "identified by mainstream mental health organizations as a pseudoscience", however, as far as I can make out, this statement is based on a misinterpreted source, which doesn't actually contain it. There is a discussion about this on the talk page, and I would appreciate it if you could take a look at it and make some comment. I don't want to edit the NARTH article at the moment, let alone get involved in an edit war, but ultimately this edit will have to be reverted if it cannot be justified. [[User:Born Gay|Born Gay]] ([[User talk:Born Gay|talk]]) 22:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
269905 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269904 +++$+++ 269904 +++$+++ 2009-04-18 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.240117500E09 +++$+++ I don't have strong feelings about the category. If [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] can justify its inclusion as an accepted therapy, that is fine wuth me.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I don't have strong feelings about the category. If [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] can justify its inclusion as an accepted therapy, that is fine wuth me.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:05, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
269906 +++$+++ Born Gay +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269904 +++$+++ 269905 +++$+++ 2009-04-18 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.240117920E09 +++$+++ I would personally very much like to see the pseudoscience category used, but only if that can be justified in terms of Wikipedia's policies. At the moment, I don't think that reliable sources indicate that the mainstream view is that conversion therapy is a pseudoscience (I wish that WERE the mainstream view, but currently it may not be). I think that, if you wanted to add the pseudoscience category, it would have been better to have added it to the conversion therapy article first, not to the NARTH article. Starting a discussion about this on the conversion therapy talk page would have been the ideal approach, before making changes to any of the articles.  +++$+++ ::I would personally very much like to see the pseudoscience category used, but only if that can be justified in terms of Wikipedia's policies. At the moment, I don't think that reliable sources indicate that the mainstream view is that conversion therapy is a pseudoscience (I wish that WERE the mainstream view, but currently it may not be). I think that, if you wanted to add the pseudoscience category, it would have been better to have added it to the conversion therapy article first, not to the NARTH article. Starting a discussion about this on the conversion therapy talk page would have been the ideal approach, before making changes to any of the articles. [[User:Born Gay|Born Gay]] ([[User talk:Born Gay|talk]]) 22:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
269907 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269904 +++$+++ 269906 +++$+++ 2009-04-18 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.240118460E09 +++$+++ Would you take a look at [[Homosexual transsexual]], where there is an argument going on about what the article contents should be, and give an opinion? It seems as if personal points of view are being injected into the article content. &mdash; +++$+++ :::Would you take a look at [[Homosexual transsexual]], where there is an argument going on about what the article contents should be, and give an opinion? It seems as if personal points of view are being injected into the article content. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
269908 +++$+++ Born Gay +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269904 +++$+++ 269907 +++$+++ 2009-04-19 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.240126080E09 +++$+++ I know next to nothing about trans issues, so I don't think I can say anything helpful there. I have replied to your comments about pseudoscience on the NARTH talk page.  +++$+++ ::::I know next to nothing about trans issues, so I don't think I can say anything helpful there. I have replied to your comments about pseudoscience on the NARTH talk page. [[User:Born Gay|Born Gay]] ([[User talk:Born Gay|talk]]) 00:28, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

7761 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-18 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.295389140E09 +++$+++ Hi Kintetsubuffalo. Could you add a note to the 3O section on the talk page of this article? I have some questions regarding Quigley's note but would rather wait until you've had the chance to state your position. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Hi Kintetsubuffalo. Could you add a note to the 3O section on the talk page of this article? I have some questions regarding Quigley's note but would rather wait until you've had the chance to state your position. Thanks. --[[User:RegentsPark|rgpk]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 14:19, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
7762 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7761 +++$+++ 7761 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.295433540E09 +++$+++ Done, and they're still at it. I'm begging everyone I can to lock this down until 3O is resolved.-- +++$+++ :Done, and they're still at it. I'm begging everyone I can to lock this down until 3O is resolved.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 02:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

157381 +++$+++ Ni fact finder +++$+++ Larry V +++$+++ 157381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-21 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.308705840E09 +++$+++ In relation to this article, I got allot of the information for the history section from a historian who works in the Enniskillen Castle Museum, Fermanagh - this information also appeared in a newspaper booklet that in not available online; how can this be referenced?  +++$+++ In relation to this article, I got allot of the information for the history section from a historian who works in the Enniskillen Castle Museum, Fermanagh - this information also appeared in a newspaper booklet that in not available online; how can this be referenced? [[User:Ni fact finder|Ni fact finder]] ([[User talk:Ni fact finder|talk]]) 18:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
157382 +++$+++ Larry V +++$+++ Larry V +++$+++ 157381 +++$+++ 157381 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.308709920E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Offline sources]]. ''' +++$+++ : See [[Wikipedia:Offline sources]]. '''[[User:Larry V|Larry&nbsp;V]]'''&nbsp;<small>([[User talk:Larry V|talk]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[Special:Emailuser/Larry V|email]])</small> 19:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

7764 +++$+++ Reisio +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-24 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.295937000E09 +++$+++ \xa6  +++$+++ ¦ [[User:Reisio|Reisio]] ([[User talk:Reisio|talk]]) 22:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
7765 +++$+++ Reisio +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7764 +++$+++ 7764 +++$+++ 2011-02-06 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.297034820E09 +++$+++ Thanks man :p I'll stop buggin' you now. \xa6  +++$+++ :Thanks man :p I'll stop buggin' you now. ¦ [[User:Reisio|Reisio]] ([[User talk:Reisio|talk]]) 15:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

7766 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-28 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.296221340E09 +++$+++ [[WP:VOA|Vandalism only account]] applies only to named accounts, not IP's. We can indefinitely block named accounts, but rarely an IP.   +++$+++ [[WP:VOA|Vandalism only account]] applies only to named accounts, not IP's. We can indefinitely block named accounts, but rarely an IP.  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 05:29, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
7767 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7766 +++$+++ 7766 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.296222180E09 +++$+++ Yeah, but if that's all they're here for, they should get more than a hand-wringing \"oh, they don't have enough warnings yet\". They're vandals just the same, they steal moments of my life and yours that we don't need to be cleaning up after them, yet we have to. They should feel that somehow, even just a day block. Otherwise it's just a waste of time to continually warn them.-- +++$+++ :Yeah, but if that's all they're here for, they should get more than a hand-wringing "oh, they don't have enough warnings yet". They're vandals just the same, they steal moments of my life and yours that we don't need to be cleaning up after them, yet we have to. They should feel that somehow, even just a day block. Otherwise it's just a waste of time to continually warn them.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 05:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
7768 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7766 +++$+++ 7767 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.296262980E09 +++$+++ I agree; and it depends on the 'quality' of the vandalism, in severe cases a jump in warning level or even a block on no-warnings is warranted.  Depends on the situation and the reviewing admin.   +++$+++ ::I agree; and it depends on the 'quality' of the vandalism, in severe cases a jump in warning level or even a block on no-warnings is warranted.  Depends on the situation and the reviewing admin.  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">☥</span>]]</small> 17:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

269911 +++$+++ Thorseth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269911 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-20 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.240282560E09 +++$+++ You have changed the category of a few articles related to LEDs from \"Display technology\" to \"Liquid crystal displays\". LEDs are not related to LCD other than that they are sometimes used for backlighting. Would you explain you edits or revert them? Regards  +++$+++ You have changed the category of a few articles related to LEDs from "Display technology" to "Liquid crystal displays". LEDs are not related to LCD other than that they are sometimes used for backlighting. Would you explain you edits or revert them? Regards [[User:Thorseth|Thorseth]] ([[User talk:Thorseth|talk]]) 19:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
269912 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269911 +++$+++ 269911 +++$+++ 2009-04-20 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.240282800E09 +++$+++ I will revert them if you want.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I will revert them if you want.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
269913 +++$+++ Thorseth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269911 +++$+++ 269912 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.240336560E09 +++$+++ That would be allright, Thanks -- +++$+++ ::That would be allright, Thanks --[[User:Thorseth|Thorseth]] ([[User talk:Thorseth|talk]]) 10:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

7769 +++$+++ Urashimataro +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-28 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.296226020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Urashimataro|Frank (Urashima Tarō)]] ([[User talk:Urashimataro|talk]]) 06:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
7770 +++$+++ Tenmei +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7769 +++$+++ 7769 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.296252600E09 +++$+++ IMO, even though there is disagreement about four words, I construe this as a context in which both [[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] and [[User:Urashimataro|Urashimataro]] and I are all [http:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/on_the_same_page  \"on the same page\"]. Do you take my point? -- +++$+++ :IMO, even though there is disagreement about four words, I construe this as a context in which both [[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] and [[User:Urashimataro|Urashimataro]] and I are all [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/on_the_same_page  "on the same page"]. Do you take my point? --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 14:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
7771 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7769 +++$+++ 7769 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.296254220E09 +++$+++ Thank you Tenmei. Being Shinto myself, I am uncomfortable with this seeming rewrite of Japanese culture as it has been understood for so long. I take umbrage at Urashimataro's claim that I know nothing of the subject, and so no, we're not on the same page after all.-- +++$+++ :Thank you Tenmei. Being Shinto myself, I am uncomfortable with this seeming rewrite of Japanese culture as it has been understood for so long. I take umbrage at Urashimataro's claim that I know nothing of the subject, and so no, we're not on the same page after all.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 14:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
7772 +++$+++ Tenmei +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7769 +++$+++ 7771 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.296352020E09 +++$+++ Please consider the analysis and opinions I have posted [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Japan&diff=410787580&oldid=410751748  here] -- +++$+++ ::Please consider the analysis and opinions I have posted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Japan&diff=410787580&oldid=410751748  here] --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 17:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

269914 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-20 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.240294920E09 +++$+++ Hi there!  Would you like to offer a broad critique of [[History of Mysore and Coorg (1565\u20131760)]], which I've been ignoring lately.  You can do so on the article talk page.  A paragraph or two.  Not the details, but the big picture.  I'm hoping it will inspire me to get my ass in gear and attend to the article, add the footnotes etc.  I mean I haven't even copyedited it in a long time.  Shameful.    +++$+++ Hi there!  Would you like to offer a broad critique of [[History of Mysore and Coorg (1565–1760)]], which I've been ignoring lately.  You can do so on the article talk page.  A paragraph or two.  Not the details, but the big picture.  I'm hoping it will inspire me to get my ass in gear and attend to the article, add the footnotes etc.  I mean I haven't even copyedited it in a long time.  Shameful.   [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 23:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
269915 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269914 +++$+++ 269914 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.240298640E09 +++$+++ Hi! It is good to hear from you. I will try to offer a critique. I am suffering from Wiki-malaise, so it means I will have to get my ass in gear also, as I have not been doing anything Wiki-constructive lately. It means I have to Wiki-think! Will do my best. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Hi! It is good to hear from you. I will try to offer a critique. I am suffering from Wiki-malaise, so it means I will have to get my ass in gear also, as I have not been doing anything Wiki-constructive lately. It means I have to Wiki-think! Will do my best. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

525583 +++$+++ Mikebar +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-16 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.197825660E09 +++$+++ You removed red linked syndromes in [[Fatigue (medical)]].  I suggest that the items be put back but not wikilinked until articles are written.   +++$+++ You removed red linked syndromes in [[Fatigue (medical)]].  I suggest that the items be put back but not wikilinked until articles are written.  [[User:Mikebar|Mikebar]] ([[User talk:Mikebar|talk]]) 09:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
525584 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525583 +++$+++ 525583 +++$+++ 2007-12-16 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.197846480E09 +++$+++ If you are offering to provide references to assert that those conditions are causes of fatigue, I'd have no objection to their reinclusion. If you're not offering to provide references, but still want the redlinks back in, please discuss at [[Talk:Fatigue (medical)]] before restoring them. -- +++$+++ :If you are offering to provide references to assert that those conditions are causes of fatigue, I'd have no objection to their reinclusion. If you're not offering to provide references, but still want the redlinks back in, please discuss at [[Talk:Fatigue (medical)]] before restoring them. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 15:08, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

269916 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-17 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.240026960E09 +++$+++ In return for [[Maxwell's Urban Hang Suite]], would you have time to look over the prose quality at [[Field lacrosse]]? -- +++$+++ In return for [[Maxwell's Urban Hang Suite]], would you have time to look over the prose quality at [[Field lacrosse]]? --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 20:56, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
269917 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269916 +++$+++ 269916 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.240029900E09 +++$+++ Answered on Philcha's talkpage.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Answered on Philcha's talkpage.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
269918 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269916 +++$+++ 269917 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.240030380E09 +++$+++ If you don't mind copy-editing, I'd be grateful. Otherwise I was on the point of failing the article on prose quality, despite its other virtues, because IMO the amount of help it needs is more than a reviewer ought to provide, in terms of objectivity. The editor is a nice guy, and knows the game, but has a tin ear for prose. If you do, give it a couple of days, as there are a couple of factual items that need to be clarified. -- +++$+++ ::If you don't mind copy-editing, I'd be grateful. Otherwise I was on the point of failing the article on prose quality, despite its other virtues, because IMO the amount of help it needs is more than a reviewer ought to provide, in terms of objectivity. The editor is a nice guy, and knows the game, but has a tin ear for prose. If you do, give it a couple of days, as there are a couple of factual items that need to be clarified. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 21:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
269919 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269916 +++$+++ 269918 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.240030620E09 +++$+++ OK. Let me know when. Also, make sure it is all right with the editor.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::OK. Let me know when. Also, make sure it is all right with the editor.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
269920 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269916 +++$+++ 269919 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.240320420E09 +++$+++ I think this would be a good time. -- +++$+++ ::::I think this would be a good time. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 06:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
269921 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269916 +++$+++ 269919 +++$+++ 2009-04-24 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.240588140E09 +++$+++ Have you done all the copyediting you intend to do on [[Field lacrosse]]? -- +++$+++ ::::Have you done all the copyediting you intend to do on [[Field lacrosse]]? --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 08:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
269922 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269916 +++$+++ 269921 +++$+++ 2009-04-24 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.240609500E09 +++$+++ I have been off wiki for the last day or two and have fallen behind. Give me a little time and I can go through it today or tomorrow.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I have been off wiki for the last day or two and have fallen behind. Give me a little time and I can go through it today or tomorrow.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:45, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
269923 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269916 +++$+++ 269921 +++$+++ 2009-04-24 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.240611900E09 +++$+++ Thaks, real life<sup>sigh<\/sup> sometimes messes up my schedule too. -- +++$+++ :::::Thaks, real life<sup>sigh</sup> sometimes messes up my schedule too. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 15:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
269924 +++$+++ Mitico +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269916 +++$+++ 269917 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.240879500E09 +++$+++ Matisse, I want to drop you a note thanking you for your copy-edits and comments regarding the Field lacrosse article. I have always noticed your work around wikipedia and appreciate your efforts. Thanks again,  +++$+++ :*Matisse, I want to drop you a note thanking you for your copy-edits and comments regarding the Field lacrosse article. I have always noticed your work around wikipedia and appreciate your efforts. Thanks again, [[User:Mitico|Mitico]] ([[User talk:Mitico|talk]]) 17:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
269925 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269916 +++$+++ 269924 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.240880700E09 +++$+++ Your thanks is much appreciated. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::*Your thanks is much appreciated. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

7774 +++$+++ Urashimataro +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-30 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.296458220E09 +++$+++ We both work on Shinto, and we have to get along. I believe I have always done good and reliable work. Every sentence I write comes from something I have read, and I am careful about the material I use. The next time you have a problem with what I write, please talk directly to me: you will find me receptive, polite and ready to compromise.  +++$+++ We both work on Shinto, and we have to get along. I believe I have always done good and reliable work. Every sentence I write comes from something I have read, and I am careful about the material I use. The next time you have a problem with what I write, please talk directly to me: you will find me receptive, polite and ready to compromise. [[User:Urashimataro|Frank (Urashima Tarō)]] ([[User talk:Urashimataro|talk]]) 23:17, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
7775 +++$+++ Tenmei +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7774 +++$+++ 7774 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.296534240E09 +++$+++ [[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] -- I wonder if it makes sense to speculate that you and [[User:Urashimataro|Urashimataro]] are alike in wanting your contributions to our Wikipedia project to be like a kind of \"bridge used by everyone\"? -- +++$+++ :[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] -- I wonder if it makes sense to speculate that you and [[User:Urashimataro|Urashimataro]] are alike in wanting your contributions to our Wikipedia project to be like a kind of "bridge used by everyone"? --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 20:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

532063 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532063 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-30 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.164950220E09 +++$+++ The list includes many people that can't be really called war criminals: Draza Mihailovic for instance... then again, we need to choose what really a \"war criminal\" is, or we'll lose the list. The list also attracts the Lists of Croat and Bosniac wars to be created (which someone will, probably) and then, you can imagine what'll happen. -- +++$+++ The list includes many people that can't be really called war criminals: Draza Mihailovic for instance... then again, we need to choose what really a "war criminal" is, or we'll lose the list. The list also attracts the Lists of Croat and Bosniac wars to be created (which someone will, probably) and then, you can imagine what'll happen. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 21:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
532064 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532063 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.164953580E09 +++$+++ I repeat - what makes someone a war criminal? Are Slobodan Milosevic and Franjo Tudjman (and perhaps if at all, Alija Izetbegovic) not war criminals, just because death saved them? Then again I ask - why is Draza Mihailovic a war criminal. Also, only a part of the people on the list was accused by ICTY. This is all ambiguous, and what precisely is a War Criminal should be much more precise. -- +++$+++ :::I repeat - what makes someone a war criminal? Are Slobodan Milosevic and Franjo Tudjman (and perhaps if at all, Alija Izetbegovic) not war criminals, just because death saved them? Then again I ask - why is Draza Mihailovic a war criminal. Also, only a part of the people on the list was accused by ICTY. This is all ambiguous, and what precisely is a War Criminal should be much more precise. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 22:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
532065 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532063 +++$+++ 532063 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.164954000E09 +++$+++ Besides, the article ''has to'' be deleted, because it violates [[WP:POINT]]. You may create it - or someone else, but plain fact is that Ancient Land of Bosoni created it to prove that one ethnic group is more evil than the others - and that's why it simply has to be deleted. If you think the article should stay, please do remake it after its deletion. -- +++$+++ :Besides, the article ''has to'' be deleted, because it violates [[WP:POINT]]. You may create it - or someone else, but plain fact is that Ancient Land of Bosoni created it to prove that one ethnic group is more evil than the others - and that's why it simply has to be deleted. If you think the article should stay, please do remake it after its deletion. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 22:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

7781 +++$+++ Bduke +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7781 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-11 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.297440420E09 +++$+++ Hi, I tried to fix the fair use stuff for [[:File:Chief Scout's Award (The Scout Association) (pre 2003).png]] on [[Scouts (The Scout Association)]]. There is a similar need to do it for [[:File:Chief Scout's Silver Award (The Scout Association).png]] on [[Cub Scouts (The Scout Association)]]. The problem has been flagged on their talk pages. Could you please take a look. We need to to the merge pf the Progressive Award Scheme, but I am tied up. That will then need all these imgaes looking at again. Cheers, -- +++$+++ Hi, I tried to fix the fair use stuff for [[:File:Chief Scout's Award (The Scout Association) (pre 2003).png]] on [[Scouts (The Scout Association)]]. There is a similar need to do it for [[:File:Chief Scout's Silver Award (The Scout Association).png]] on [[Cub Scouts (The Scout Association)]]. The problem has been flagged on their talk pages. Could you please take a look. We need to to the merge pf the Progressive Award Scheme, but I am tied up. That will then need all these imgaes looking at again. Cheers, --[[User:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''Bduke'''</span>]]  [[User_talk:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''(Discussion)'''</span>]] 08:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
7782 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7781 +++$+++ 7781 +++$+++ 2011-02-11 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.297453860E09 +++$+++ Got it-the bot isn't recognizing that these names were corrected about a year ago. At some point we have to go through all Scout images and correct the names in the articles, but Ed and Jergen and I are fixing them as the bots catch them. This has been happening a lot the last month-it's a bot error.-- +++$+++ :Got it-the bot isn't recognizing that these names were corrected about a year ago. At some point we have to go through all Scout images and correct the names in the articles, but Ed and Jergen and I are fixing them as the bots catch them. This has been happening a lot the last month-it's a bot error.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 11:51, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
7783 +++$+++ Bduke +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7781 +++$+++ 7782 +++$+++ 2011-02-11 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.297488060E09 +++$+++ I think the problem is different. First, the talk pages say that there is no justification for fair use. For [[:File:Chief Scout's Award (The Scout Association) (pre 2003).png]], I added a section for [[:Scouts (The Scout Association)]], but there is now some big red error stuff. Second, I noticed that the earlier justification says the image is used in the infobox, but it is not. I tried to alter it. I then stopped, but justification for [[: File:Chief Scout's Silver Award (The Scout Association).png]] on [[:Cub Scouts (The Scout Association)]] is still needed and the current justification says it is in the infobox of [[:Cub Scouts (The Scout Association)]], which is not correct. I seem to forget more about images than I remember! -- +++$+++ ::I think the problem is different. First, the talk pages say that there is no justification for fair use. For [[:File:Chief Scout's Award (The Scout Association) (pre 2003).png]], I added a section for [[:Scouts (The Scout Association)]], but there is now some big red error stuff. Second, I noticed that the earlier justification says the image is used in the infobox, but it is not. I tried to alter it. I then stopped, but justification for [[: File:Chief Scout's Silver Award (The Scout Association).png]] on [[:Cub Scouts (The Scout Association)]] is still needed and the current justification says it is in the infobox of [[:Cub Scouts (The Scout Association)]], which is not correct. I seem to forget more about images than I remember! --[[User:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''Bduke'''</span>]]  [[User_talk:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''(Discussion)'''</span>]] 21:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

269926 +++$+++ Born Gay +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269926 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-21 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.240306620E09 +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse, I noticed that you added the conversion therapy category to the Sexual Identity Therapy article. I'm not sure that the category applies there. I left a comment about that on the article's talk page.  +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse, I noticed that you added the conversion therapy category to the Sexual Identity Therapy article. I'm not sure that the category applies there. I left a comment about that on the article's talk page. [[User:Born Gay|Born Gay]] ([[User talk:Born Gay|talk]]) 02:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
269927 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269926 +++$+++ 269926 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.240467480E09 +++$+++ Whatever you think is OK with me. &mdash; +++$+++ :Whatever you think is OK with me. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:18, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

525585 +++$+++ FQ1513 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-22 05:50:00 +++$+++ 1.198331400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:FQ1513|FQ1513]] ([[User talk:FQ1513|talk]]) 05:50, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
525586 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525585 +++$+++ 525585 +++$+++ 2007-12-22 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.198389360E09 +++$+++ Thank you, but the person you should really thank is [[User talk:Diberri|Diberri]], who built that wonderful tool. -- +++$+++ :Thank you, but the person you should really thank is [[User talk:Diberri|Diberri]], who built that wonderful tool. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 21:56, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

269928 +++$+++ Ling.Nut.Public +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-23 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.240477260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your nice comment on my user page, some time ago. I removed it, solely because the user page wasn't the location where I wanted to discuss things. But I appreciate your comment!  +++$+++ Thanks for your nice comment on my user page, some time ago. I removed it, solely because the user page wasn't the location where I wanted to discuss things. But I appreciate your comment! [[User:Ling.Nut.Public|Ling.Nut.Public]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut.Public|talk]]) 02:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
269929 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269928 +++$+++ 269928 +++$+++ 2009-04-23 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.240477740E09 +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Ling.Nut.Public|Ling.Nut.Public]]. It was extraordinarily beautiful, touching. Hope you are doing OK as a Public entity, and I miss your more frequent presence.  &mdash; +++$+++ : Thanks, [[User:Ling.Nut.Public|Ling.Nut.Public]]. It was extraordinarily beautiful, touching. Hope you are doing OK as a Public entity, and I miss your more frequent presence.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
269930 +++$+++ Ryan Postlethwaite +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269928 +++$+++ 269929 +++$+++ 2009-04-23 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.240544400E09 +++$+++ ''For the Mediation Committee,'' ''' +++$+++ ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' '''[[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|<font color="green">Ryan</font> <font color="purple">Postlethwaite</font>]]''' 20:40, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

7785 +++$+++ KeroroGunso +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7785 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-22 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.298365320E09 +++$+++ I'm trying to improve this page.  As it is, it's a mash of rumor, misinformation, and stuff from the General Union.  I'm more than willing to get sources to improve the page quality so that it makes it into the Japan Project and the Education Project.  I'd appreciate any help +++$+++ I'm trying to improve this page.  As it is, it's a mash of rumor, misinformation, and stuff from the General Union.  I'm more than willing to get sources to improve the page quality so that it makes it into the Japan Project and the Education Project.  I'd appreciate any help[[User:KeroroGunso|KeroroGunso]] ([[User talk:KeroroGunso|talk]]) 01:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
7786 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7785 +++$+++ 7785 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.298401680E09 +++$+++ For me it's a topic of interest but I'm not an employee, so I don't know what I can do, but I will help.-- +++$+++ :For me it's a topic of interest but I'm not an employee, so I don't know what I can do, but I will help.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 11:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

7787 +++$+++ User:benlisquare +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-24 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.298584440E09 +++$+++ I thought editors were permitted to remove blatant and obvious [[WP:SOAPBOX]]ing from article talkpages... unless I am mistaken? Comments that are [[WP:FORUM]] material and are not contributing to the project are usually removed, if I recall. --<span style=\"border:1px solid yellow;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ I thought editors were permitted to remove blatant and obvious [[WP:SOAPBOX]]ing from article talkpages... unless I am mistaken? Comments that are [[WP:FORUM]] material and are not contributing to the project are usually removed, if I recall. --<span style="border:1px solid yellow;padding:1px;">[[User:benlisquare|<font style="color:#FFFF00;background:red;">'''&nbsp;李博杰&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> | <small>—[[User talk:benlisquare|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Benlisquare|contribs]] [[Special:EmailUser/User:Benlisquare|email]]</small> 13:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
7788 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7787 +++$+++ 7787 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.298584740E09 +++$+++ They are, if the edit in question is disruptive and trolling. HXL49, however, makes a point to troll, editorialize and POV back both in talkpages and with his summaries. Hence the revert-it wasn't an AGF removal, it was snarking for the point of snarking.-- +++$+++ :They are, if the edit in question is disruptive and trolling. HXL49, however, makes a point to troll, editorialize and POV back both in talkpages and with his summaries. Hence the revert-it wasn't an AGF removal, it was snarking for the point of snarking.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 13:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

269934 +++$+++ Dylan620 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-24 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.240557660E09 +++$+++ --<font face=\"comic sans ms\">'''[[User:Dylan620|<font color=\"blue\">Dylan<\/font>]][[User talk:Dylan620|<font color=\"purple\">620<\/font>]]''' <sub>[[Special:Contributions\/Dylan620|Efforts]] \xb7  +++$+++ --<font face="comic sans ms">'''[[User:Dylan620|<font color="blue">Dylan</font>]][[User talk:Dylan620|<font color="purple">620</font>]]''' <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Dylan620|Efforts]] · [[User:Dylan620/Personal toolbox|Toolbox]]</sub></font> 00:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
269935 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269934 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-24 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.240610520E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I am truly honored and it is very kind of you. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :*Thank you! I am truly honored and it is very kind of you. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
269936 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269934 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-25 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.240720260E09 +++$+++ : Hey, sorry I missed it! (I has a similar award on 21st, funnily enough!) Many thanks for adding your own encouraging words for DV. '' +++$+++ :*: Hey, sorry I missed it! (I has a similar award on 21st, funnily enough!) Many thanks for adding your own encouraging words for DV. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 21:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

7792 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-11 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.299902520E09 +++$+++ If you look at [[Wikipedia:File_mover#What_files_should_not_be_renamed?]] it clearly says that you should not make cosmetic changes. -- +++$+++ If you look at [[Wikipedia:File_mover#What_files_should_not_be_renamed?]] it clearly says that you should not make cosmetic changes. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73|talk]]) 20:02, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
7793 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7792 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.300044780E09 +++$+++ [[WP:BOLD]], but I get it. -- +++$+++ :::[[WP:BOLD]], but I get it. --[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 12:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
7794 +++$+++ John Vandenberg +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7792 +++$+++ 7792 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.299903900E09 +++$+++ I've looked through your move log and see many other cases which are inappropriate.  Please do not push the boundaries with this new tool. <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ :I've looked through your move log and see many other cases which are inappropriate.  Please do not push the boundaries with this new tool. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]]  <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 20:25, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
7795 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7792 +++$+++ 7794 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.300044780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the pile-on, dripping with AGF.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the pile-on, dripping with AGF.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 12:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

269937 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269937 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-25 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.240727340E09 +++$+++ Would it also follow that the sources from the [http:\/\/www.fact-archive.com\/encyclopedia\/Collapse_of_the_Soviet_Union source] (''The Revenge of the Past: Nationalism, Revolution, and the Collapse of the Soviet Union, Ronald Grigor Suny, Stanford University Press, 1993, ISBN 0804722471'') are unreliable as well? Or can it be used as a substitute? <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ Would it also follow that the sources from the [http://www.fact-archive.com/encyclopedia/Collapse_of_the_Soviet_Union source] (''The Revenge of the Past: Nationalism, Revolution, and the Collapse of the Soviet Union, Ronald Grigor Suny, Stanford University Press, 1993, ISBN 0804722471'') are unreliable as well? Or can it be used as a substitute? <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 23:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
269938 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269937 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-25 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.240727640E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/www.spiritus-temporis.com\/soviet-union\/history.html is also unreliable. But the others look good, so hopefully you can replace the sources. The article is interesting.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :*http://www.spiritus-temporis.com/soviet-union/history.html is also unreliable. But the others look good, so hopefully you can replace the sources. The article is interesting.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:34, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
269939 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269937 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-25 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.240728540E09 +++$+++ Update: Thanks for the footnotes. I am...notoriously horrible at making them. I rely on the Wikifey to do it. ...hmm...*frowns* I cannot find the references that source used for its information... <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ ::Update: Thanks for the footnotes. I am...notoriously horrible at making them. I rely on the Wikifey to do it. ...hmm...*frowns* I cannot find the references that source used for its information... <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 23:49, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
269940 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269937 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-25 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.240728840E09 +++$+++ Well, try to reference as much as you can in the article. If necessary, you can use a different hook with information that is referenced.  (There are tools you can use to help format references, if you are interested.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::: Well, try to reference as much as you can in the article. If necessary, you can use a different hook with information that is referenced.  (There are tools you can use to help format references, if you are interested.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:54, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
269941 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269937 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-26 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.240729260E09 +++$+++ Well, since there '''is''' now a reference for the hook and the only issue is with another reference that has nothing to do with the hook and, thus, nothing to do with the nomination...are we good for now? I'm going to see what I can do to fix that one source, but the nomination should be able to go on while i'm doing it.  (And, yeah, i'd be interested. :) ) <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ ::::Well, since there '''is''' now a reference for the hook and the only issue is with another reference that has nothing to do with the hook and, thus, nothing to do with the nomination...are we good for now? I'm going to see what I can do to fix that one source, but the nomination should be able to go on while i'm doing it.  (And, yeah, i'd be interested. :) ) <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 00:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
269942 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269937 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-26 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.240729620E09 +++$+++ I think you should get rid of http:\/\/www.spiritus-temporis.com\/soviet-union\/history.html, as it says it gets its info from wikipedia. I will look again at the article.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I think you should get rid of http://www.spiritus-temporis.com/soviet-union/history.html, as it says it gets its info from wikipedia. I will look again at the article.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
269943 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269937 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-26 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.240729980E09 +++$+++ Done. I should be able to find a reference for that info somewhere...<font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ ::::::Done. I should be able to find a reference for that info somewhere...<font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 00:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
269944 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269937 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-26 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.240730520E09 +++$+++ Great! It is a really interesting articles, as I did not know how all that happened before.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::Great! It is a really interesting articles, as I did not know how all that happened before.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
269945 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269937 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-26 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.240733640E09 +++$+++ That's what researching a red link can do for you. :P  I got a little more with another reference, but nothing to cover that paragraph and a half. It looks like it might need a couple of references strung together, since there's unlikely to be one reference that has all the information in it. <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ ::::::::That's what researching a red link can do for you. :P  I got a little more with another reference, but nothing to cover that paragraph and a half. It looks like it might need a couple of references strung together, since there's unlikely to be one reference that has all the information in it. <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 01:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

532082 +++$+++ Estavisti +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-26 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.167205020E09 +++$+++ \u041d\u0435 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u043c \u0448\u0442\u0430 \u0441\u0438 \u0441\u0435 \u0443\u0442\u0440\u0438\u043f\u043e\u0432'\u043e, \u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0441\u0440\u043f\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u043a\u0430 \u0443 \u0411\u0438\u0425 \u0458\u0435 \u0434\u0435\u0432\u0435\u0434\u0435\u0441\u0435\u0442\u0438\u0445 \u0431\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0421\u0440\u043f\u0441\u043a\u0430 '''\u0434\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0441\u043a\u0430''' \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u043a\u0430. ''\u0422\u043e'' \u0458\u0435 \u041a\u0430\u0440\u0430\u045f\u0438\u045b\u0435\u0432\u0430 \u0438 \u041f\u043b\u0430\u0432\u0448\u0438\u045b\u0435\u0432\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u043a\u0430. \u0421\u0420\u0421 \u0443 \u0421\u0440\u043f\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0458 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0434\u0430 1% \u0433\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043e\u0432\u0430. \u0427\u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u0437\u043d\u0430... -- +++$+++ Не знам шта си се утрипов'о, али српска странка у БиХ је деведесетих била Српска '''демократска''' странка. ''То'' је Караџићева и Плавшићева странка. СРС у Српској добија можда 1% гласова. Чисто да се зна... --[[User:Estavisti|Еstavisti]] 23:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
532083 +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532082 +++$+++ 532082 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.167206820E09 +++$+++ Da li je tvoj komentar za mene ili za Paxa? Drugo, za Bos. Dubicu ne razumijem \u0161to pi\u0161e\u0161 \"19992\" a ne \"1992\", ovo je ve\u0107 drugi put danas. Pozdrav,  +++$+++ :Da li je tvoj komentar za mene ili za Paxa? Drugo, za Bos. Dubicu ne razumijem što pišeš "19992" a ne "1992", ovo je već drugi put danas. Pozdrav, [[User:Kseferovic|Vseferović]] 00:07, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
532084 +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532082 +++$+++ 532082 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.167216960E09 +++$+++ No problem, I was worried that this might have been a sick joke. However, I can see that it isn't. To answer your question, Safet is a pretty common name, while his last name isn't as much. (The opposite goes for me.)  +++$+++ :No problem, I was worried that this might have been a sick joke. However, I can see that it isn't. To answer your question, Safet is a pretty common name, while his last name isn't as much. (The opposite goes for me.) [[User:Kseferovic|Vseferović]] 02:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

7796 +++$+++ Orionist +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7796 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-16 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.300310280E09 +++$+++ This video is quite a find! I didn't realize VoA had such interesting videos on their website, and free for us to use nonetheless! Do you need me to do anything to the file by the way? Regards, --  +++$+++ This video is quite a find! I didn't realize VoA had such interesting videos on their website, and free for us to use nonetheless! Do you need me to do anything to the file by the way? Regards, -- [[User:Orionist|<font color="#0066CC">'''Orionist'''</font>]] ★ [[User talk:Orionist|<font color="#0066CC">talk</font>]] 14:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
7797 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7796 +++$+++ 7796 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.300312080E09 +++$+++ Not the video, but the [[:File:Public Scout and Girl Guide Movement.png|Libyan Scout emblem]], if you can-the flag behind the leader is deeper green, can you give it an svg?-- +++$+++ :Not the video, but the [[:File:Public Scout and Girl Guide Movement.png|Libyan Scout emblem]], if you can-the flag behind the leader is deeper green, can you give it an svg?--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 14:48, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
7798 +++$+++ Orionist +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7796 +++$+++ 7797 +++$+++ 2011-03-24 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.300998060E09 +++$+++ I have so little free time these days, and most of it I'm far from my home computer (where my graphics software are, that's why I've done very few requests in the last couple of months.) I'm hoping I can get back to working on requests (and restart work on the emblems) in a week or two. Regards, --  +++$+++ ::I have so little free time these days, and most of it I'm far from my home computer (where my graphics software are, that's why I've done very few requests in the last couple of months.) I'm hoping I can get back to working on requests (and restart work on the emblems) in a week or two. Regards, -- [[User:Orionist|<font color="#0066CC">'''Orionist'''</font>]] ★ [[User talk:Orionist|<font color="#0066CC">talk</font>]] 13:21, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
7799 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7796 +++$+++ 7796 +++$+++ 2011-03-24 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.300998240E09 +++$+++ No worries, take your time, take care, busy here in Japan too. Thank you!-- +++$+++ :No worries, take your time, take care, busy here in Japan too. Thank you!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 13:24, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

532087 +++$+++ Llama man +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-29 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.167441240E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that. I just assumed that since SUIT !voted already, !voting was open. I didn't think the answer to question 1 would affect my !vote (and it didn't) since I don't usually support a user who has almost no participation in XfDs and the Wikipedia talk namespace. By the way, you should put your RfA on [[WP:RfA|main RfA page]], as many more people !vote that way. &ndash;[[User:Llama man|The Gre]][[User talk:Llama man|at Llama]]<sup> +++$+++ Sorry about that. I just assumed that since SUIT !voted already, !voting was open. I didn't think the answer to question 1 would affect my !vote (and it didn't) since I don't usually support a user who has almost no participation in XfDs and the Wikipedia talk namespace. By the way, you should put your RfA on [[WP:RfA|main RfA page]], as many more people !vote that way. &ndash;[[User:Llama man|The Gre]][[User talk:Llama man|at Llama]]<sup>[[User:Llama man/Autographs|<span style="color:red;">sign here</span>]]</sup> 17:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
532088 +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532087 +++$+++ 532087 +++$+++ 2006-12-30 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.167469200E09 +++$+++ No problem. I'll keep it private. Just send it to me via e-mail. (Vseferovic@hotmail.com). Might as  well become a member of wikipedia by the way. :) Thanks,  +++$+++ :No problem. I'll keep it private. Just send it to me via e-mail. (Vseferovic@hotmail.com). Might as  well become a member of wikipedia by the way. :) Thanks, [[User:Kseferovic|Vseferović]] 01:00, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

7801 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-06 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.302127260E09 +++$+++ Given your name, should I assume that you're a follower of baseball in Japan? If so, do you know very much about the history of baseball there? What articles would you recommend I study? I'm asking all these questions because I'm trying to develop a list of professional teams' ballparks in Japan, and in order to do so, I need to understand the history better. And also to know if such an article already exists, so I won't be re-inventing the wheel. Thank you! \u2190 +++$+++ Given your name, should I assume that you're a follower of baseball in Japan? If so, do you know very much about the history of baseball there? What articles would you recommend I study? I'm asking all these questions because I'm trying to develop a list of professional teams' ballparks in Japan, and in order to do so, I need to understand the history better. And also to know if such an article already exists, so I won't be re-inventing the wheel. Thank you! ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 15:01, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
7802 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7801 +++$+++ 7801 +++$+++ 2011-04-06 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.302129600E09 +++$+++ Thank you for pointing me to that article on Japanese baseball! It took me to [[Japanese Baseball League]], which appears to have a complete rundown of the teams that were in that league during its existence from 1936 through 1949 (minus 1945). After that, the [[Central League]] and [[Pacific League]] replaced that single league. I had seen some of this info a day or two ago, and was having a bit of trouble getting my head around it. I started with [[List of baseball parks in Tokyo]], but was not happy with the way that was going. I think what I really need to do (unless someone else has already done it) is to make a list of all the teams and their timelines (as shown in Japanese Baseball League) and sub-head each one with a list of their ballparks. Then I can combine the two to produce a list of ballparks and the teams that played under them. I would then rename [[List of baseball parks in Tokyo]] to [[List of baseball parks in Japan]] or something like that. Talking strictly professional so as not to get too broad a scope. I also like to include ballparks' locations, and I have no clue how street locations are specified in Japan, but that's not a show-stopper at this point. \u2190 +++$+++ :Thank you for pointing me to that article on Japanese baseball! It took me to [[Japanese Baseball League]], which appears to have a complete rundown of the teams that were in that league during its existence from 1936 through 1949 (minus 1945). After that, the [[Central League]] and [[Pacific League]] replaced that single league. I had seen some of this info a day or two ago, and was having a bit of trouble getting my head around it. I started with [[List of baseball parks in Tokyo]], but was not happy with the way that was going. I think what I really need to do (unless someone else has already done it) is to make a list of all the teams and their timelines (as shown in Japanese Baseball League) and sub-head each one with a list of their ballparks. Then I can combine the two to produce a list of ballparks and the teams that played under them. I would then rename [[List of baseball parks in Tokyo]] to [[List of baseball parks in Japan]] or something like that. Talking strictly professional so as not to get too broad a scope. I also like to include ballparks' locations, and I have no clue how street locations are specified in Japan, but that's not a show-stopper at this point. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 15:40, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
7803 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7801 +++$+++ 7802 +++$+++ 2011-04-06 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.302138840E09 +++$+++ I have completed a rough draft of the article I talked about, which is currently at [[User:Baseball Bugs\/sandbachs]]. I wonder if you would mind looking it over and see if I made any mistakes or omissions. The style may not be to your liking, but it's my way of organizing the data. :) At the very least, some of this could be added to the team infoboxes, which are inconsistent. \u2190 +++$+++ ::I have completed a rough draft of the article I talked about, which is currently at [[User:Baseball Bugs/sandbachs]]. I wonder if you would mind looking it over and see if I made any mistakes or omissions. The style may not be to your liking, but it's my way of organizing the data. :) At the very least, some of this could be added to the team infoboxes, which are inconsistent. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 18:14, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

269946 +++$+++ Wildroot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269946 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-26 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.240805640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing, [[Talk:James Dean (film)\/GA1|sorry if I was acting strange earlier]]. I might have just been having a bad day. Anyway, I addressed your concerns for ''Mars Attacks!'' Good day.  +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing, [[Talk:James Dean (film)/GA1|sorry if I was acting strange earlier]]. I might have just been having a bad day. Anyway, I addressed your concerns for ''Mars Attacks!'' Good day. [[User:Wildroot|Wildroot]] ([[User talk:Wildroot|talk]]) 21:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
269947 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269946 +++$+++ 269946 +++$+++ 2009-04-26 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.240808580E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! Your article passed GA. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Congratulations! Your article passed GA. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

269948 +++$+++ David Fuchs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269948 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-27 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.240866780E09 +++$+++ Yeah, this is random and stalkerish, but trust me when I have a reason for asking: where do you edit from? (City and country would be nice, but whatever you feel comfortable telling is fine.) You can just shoot me an email or reply here or via my talk. It's for a project I have to do involving wikipedia articles and editing patterns, nothing special, but I'll let you see it when I'm finished :) --<font color=\"#cc6600\"> +++$+++ Yeah, this is random and stalkerish, but trust me when I have a reason for asking: where do you edit from? (City and country would be nice, but whatever you feel comfortable telling is fine.) You can just shoot me an email or reply here or via my talk. It's for a project I have to do involving wikipedia articles and editing patterns, nothing special, but I'll let you see it when I'm finished :) --<font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs]]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 14:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
269949 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269948 +++$+++ 269948 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.240867020E09 +++$+++ I would be willing if the information remains confidential and at no point is released in any way that can be identified with me. Your project sounds like it could be  quite interesting. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I would be willing if the information remains confidential and at no point is released in any way that can be identified with me. Your project sounds like it could be  quite interesting. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
269950 +++$+++ David Fuchs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269948 +++$+++ 269949 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.240867440E09 +++$+++ The project is basically a wiki version of \"stages of seperation\", as it were, mapping top contributors to a random featured article and then following each editor's top three edited articles and ''that'' article's contributions in turn. The location of each editor is just a minor bit of additional info I thought would be interesting to throw together (along with the number of edits to pages, article status\/class, et al.) In terms of privacy, I would be putting your location next to your username, but I'm not planning on exhibiting the project in any wide way (it's my final project for an art school project and a dozen people would be critiquing it, and that's about it.) If that's still too much exposure, I understand perfectly. (If you're interested, I started with [[Bone Wars]] -> [[User:Firsfron]] -> [[Stegosaurus]] -> [[User:Casliber]] ->[[Major depressive disorder]] -> you.) --<font color=\"#cc6600\"> +++$+++ ::The project is basically a wiki version of "stages of seperation", as it were, mapping top contributors to a random featured article and then following each editor's top three edited articles and ''that'' article's contributions in turn. The location of each editor is just a minor bit of additional info I thought would be interesting to throw together (along with the number of edits to pages, article status/class, et al.) In terms of privacy, I would be putting your location next to your username, but I'm not planning on exhibiting the project in any wide way (it's my final project for an art school project and a dozen people would be critiquing it, and that's about it.) If that's still too much exposure, I understand perfectly. (If you're interested, I started with [[Bone Wars]] -> [[User:Firsfron]] -> [[Stegosaurus]] -> [[User:Casliber]] ->[[Major depressive disorder]] -> you.) --<font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs]]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 14:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
269951 +++$+++ Firsfron +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269948 +++$+++ 269950 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.240892400E09 +++$+++ This is a really neat idea, David. I hope everyone can get involved. :) <font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ :::This is a really neat idea, David. I hope everyone can get involved. :) <font color="#0000FF">[[User:Firsfron|Firsfron of Ronchester]]</font> 21:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

532093 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532093 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-31 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.167620820E09 +++$+++ Here's a [[Stari Most]] for you! [[Mostar]] pictures somehow promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others using Template:[[Template:Smile|smile]]! Happy editing!--<strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ Here's a [[Stari Most]] for you! [[Mostar]] pictures somehow promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others using Template:[[Template:Smile|smile]]! Happy editing!--<strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 19:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
532094 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532093 +++$+++ 532093 +++$+++ 2006-12-31 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.167625140E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Happy New Year for you as well. My time zone is currently the same as UTC, so 2007 shall arrive in 3h40m. Regards.--<strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ :You're welcome. Happy New Year for you as well. My time zone is currently the same as UTC, so 2007 shall arrive in 3h40m. Regards.--<strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 20:19, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

525589 +++$+++ R'n'B +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-23 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.198462140E09 +++$+++ You may be interested in issues raised on [[Template talk:Epithelial neoplasms]] concerning links you appear to have added recently to the template.  -- +++$+++ You may be interested in issues raised on [[Template talk:Epithelial neoplasms]] concerning links you appear to have added recently to the template.  --[[User:R'n'B|Russ]] [[User talk:R'n'B|(talk)]] 18:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
525590 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525589 +++$+++ 525589 +++$+++ 2007-12-23 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.198462380E09 +++$+++ Response at [[Template talk:Epithelial neoplasms]]. -- +++$+++ :Response at [[Template talk:Epithelial neoplasms]]. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 18:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
525591 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525589 +++$+++ 525589 +++$+++ 2007-12-31 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.199156100E09 +++$+++ Please review [[Wikipedia:External_links#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest]] - \"You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked.\" -- +++$+++ :Please review [[Wikipedia:External_links#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest]] - "You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked." --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 18:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

269952 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-27 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.240876140E09 +++$+++ {{User Featured Article|Saxbe fix}}{{User BQZip01\/TFA|Saxbe fix|6 March|2009}} I am recognizing you for being one of the many people who came together to improve [[Saxbe fix]] as part of its development which has resulted in its [[WP:FA]] and [[WP:TFA]] status.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ {{User Featured Article|Saxbe fix}}{{User BQZip01/TFA|Saxbe fix|6 March|2009}} I am recognizing you for being one of the many people who came together to improve [[Saxbe fix]] as part of its development which has resulted in its [[WP:FA]] and [[WP:TFA]] status.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 16:49, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
269953 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269952 +++$+++ 269952 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.240877520E09 +++$+++ Thank you. You are very kind! Regards,  &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you. You are very kind! Regards,  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:12, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

532097 +++$+++ Deuar +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.168898700E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm wondering about the two different tones of gray in your Iron curtain images. First I thought that the dark gray countries were communist but non-Warsaw pact, while light gray were non-communist but non-NATO -- this would be a useful division. However, I notice that Albania is also light gray (with red stripes). So now I'm not sure what the dark\/light division of gray represents. Reason I'm wondering is that it would be useful to explain these in image captions when the iron curtain images are used, but now I'm not sure what to put.  +++$+++ Hi, I'm wondering about the two different tones of gray in your Iron curtain images. First I thought that the dark gray countries were communist but non-Warsaw pact, while light gray were non-communist but non-NATO -- this would be a useful division. However, I notice that Albania is also light gray (with red stripes). So now I'm not sure what the dark/light division of gray represents. Reason I'm wondering is that it would be useful to explain these in image captions when the iron curtain images are used, but now I'm not sure what to put. [[User:Deuar|Deuar]] 14:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
532098 +++$+++ Deuar +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532097 +++$+++ 532097 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.168911600E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Deuar|Deuar]] 17:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

269954 +++$+++ Synergy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269954 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-28 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.240910460E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For going beyond verification of hooks by copyediting, fixing, and adjusting nominated articles. Your work is appreciated. ''' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For going beyond verification of hooks by copyediting, fixing, and adjusting nominated articles. Your work is appreciated. '''[[User:Synergy|<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Syn</font>]]'''[[User_talk:Synergy|<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">ergy</font>]] 02:21, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
269955 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269954 +++$+++ 269954 +++$+++ 2009-04-28 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.240970460E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I enjoy doing it. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ *Thank you! I enjoy doing it. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
269956 +++$+++ KudzuVine +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269954 +++$+++ 269954 +++$+++ 2009-04-28 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.240940760E09 +++$+++ The second reference of this article (McDonald under the section \"Exterior Features of Note\") says \"mules.\" I wrote oxen was possible in the article because another source mentioned mules or oxen. I will have to go back to see which one. Is the issue the \"mules or oxen?\" Or is it that you question \"mules?\" If it is the first possibility, I will check which one said oxen. I can always change the hook to \"animal-powered.\"  +++$+++ *The second reference of this article (McDonald under the section "Exterior Features of Note") says "mules." I wrote oxen was possible in the article because another source mentioned mules or oxen. I will have to go back to see which one. Is the issue the "mules or oxen?" Or is it that you question "mules?" If it is the first possibility, I will check which one said oxen. I can always change the hook to "animal-powered." [[User:KudzuVine|KudzuVine]] ([[User talk:KudzuVine|talk]]) 10:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
269957 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269954 +++$+++ 269956 +++$+++ 2009-04-28 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.240970520E09 +++$+++ I will look at it again. All I care about is that the hook is correctly referenced.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :* I will look at it again. All I care about is that the hook is correctly referenced.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
269958 +++$+++ KudzuVine +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269954 +++$+++ 269956 +++$+++ 2009-04-29 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.241068980E09 +++$+++ '''ALT1'''... that the '''[[Cotton Press (Latta, South Carolina)|cotton press]]''' ''(pictured)'' near [[Latta, South Carolina]], and '''[[Cotton Press (Tarboro, North Carolina)|another]]''' in [[Tarboro, North Carolina]], are [[antebellum]], animal-powered, handmade wooden presses?        Thanks  +++$+++ :*'''ALT1'''... that the '''[[Cotton Press (Latta, South Carolina)|cotton press]]''' ''(pictured)'' near [[Latta, South Carolina]], and '''[[Cotton Press (Tarboro, North Carolina)|another]]''' in [[Tarboro, North Carolina]], are [[antebellum]], animal-powered, handmade wooden presses?        Thanks [[User:KudzuVine|KudzuVine]] ([[User talk:KudzuVine|talk]]) 22:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
269959 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269954 +++$+++ 269958 +++$+++ 2009-04-29 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.241069880E09 +++$+++ OK! Put that '''ALT1''' where the nomination is. Looks good.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::*OK! Put that '''ALT1''' where the nomination is. Looks good.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:38, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
269960 +++$+++ KudzuVine +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269954 +++$+++ 269959 +++$+++ 2009-04-29 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.241071620E09 +++$+++ I have made the change. Thanks  +++$+++ :::*I have made the change. Thanks [[User:KudzuVine|KudzuVine]] ([[User talk:KudzuVine|talk]]) 23:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

7812 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7812 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-17 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.305673920E09 +++$+++ You just called me a liar [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Kintetsubuffalo&diff=429578315&oldid=429577349]. Take that back, now.  +++$+++ You just called me a liar [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kintetsubuffalo&diff=429578315&oldid=429577349]. Take that back, now. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 16:12, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
7813 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7812 +++$+++ 7812 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.305674160E09 +++$+++ Yes I did, give me a reason not to believe you are a liar. So far everything you've done in our interactions tonight has been underhanded and disingenuous. You can take back the rollback thing, I never asked for it anyway and I can still undo bad edits, but it really should have been a different admin with whom I am not in a dispute. You have egg all over your face, and retaliation on top of it. Anything else?-- +++$+++ :Yes I did, give me a reason not to believe you are a liar. So far everything you've done in our interactions tonight has been underhanded and disingenuous. You can take back the rollback thing, I never asked for it anyway and I can still undo bad edits, but it really should have been a different admin with whom I am not in a dispute. You have egg all over your face, and retaliation on top of it. Anything else?--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 16:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
7814 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7812 +++$+++ 7813 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.305674460E09 +++$+++ Reported at ANI.  +++$+++ :: Reported at ANI. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 16:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

7815 +++$+++ Stwalkerster +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-17 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.305690540E09 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo, I'd strongly advise you to stop attacking other editors like that - or you'll probably find yourself blocked from editing due to uncivil behaviour. You're going way over the top here, back down a little. '''<font face=\"Verdana\">&#91; +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo, I'd strongly advise you to stop attacking other editors like that - or you'll probably find yourself blocked from editing due to uncivil behaviour. You're going way over the top here, back down a little. '''<font face="Verdana">&#91;[[User:Stwalkerster|<span style="color:black">stwalkerster</span>]]&#124;[[User talk:Stwalkerster|<span style="color:black">talk</span>]]&#93;</font>''' 20:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
7816 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7815 +++$+++ 7815 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.305745080E09 +++$+++ FPaS-I have no respect for you, and I have no fear of you. \"Take it back\"-are you 12? What are you gonna do?  You and your admin buddies gonna catch me after school? Add to your conflict of interest as you did with rollback? *''gasp''* Go ahead. A block of me would show your abuse of power, I would count it a badge of honor, and I can use the break. Otherwise, go pester someone else. You'll not get what you seek from me.-- +++$+++ :FPaS-I have no respect for you, and I have no fear of you. "Take it back"-are you 12? What are you gonna do?  You and your admin buddies gonna catch me after school? Add to your conflict of interest as you did with rollback? *''gasp''* Go ahead. A block of me would show your abuse of power, I would count it a badge of honor, and I can use the break. Otherwise, go pester someone else. You'll not get what you seek from me.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 11:58, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
7817 +++$+++ Stwalkerster +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7815 +++$+++ 7816 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.305747660E09 +++$+++ I also see you're refusing to back down on the personal attacks. Consider this your final warning in that matter. '''<font face=\"Verdana\">&#91; +++$+++ ::I also see you're refusing to back down on the personal attacks. Consider this your final warning in that matter. '''<font face="Verdana">&#91;[[User:Stwalkerster|<span style="color:black">stwalkerster</span>]]&#124;[[User talk:Stwalkerster|<span style="color:black">talk</span>]]&#93;</font>''' 12:41, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
7818 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7815 +++$+++ 7815 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.305747900E09 +++$+++ Fantastic. I clearly stated as much, and I expected the standard admin line. That which you are not seeing is that which you clearly do not want to see. Run with it.-- +++$+++ :Fantastic. I clearly stated as much, and I expected the standard admin line. That which you are not seeing is that which you clearly do not want to see. Run with it.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 12:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

269961 +++$+++ Jokestress +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269961 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-28 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.240966080E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your work on that article. Hfarmer and WhatamIdoing have equal levels of capability as scientists (and equally high \"IQ\" according to their user pages), which can make it a challenge to explain to them why this specific term needs to be distinguished from the phenomenon it attempts to describe. Their training and abilities make them see the world in a very specific and similar way. I recommend checking out Ellen Feder's analysis [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=6pcR4buMC00C&pg=PA109 here.] [[Kenneth Zucker]] has been a driving force behind the shift in the DSM from homosexuality to gender identity disorder (especially [[gender identity disorder in children]]). He is the leading voice of reparative therapy of gender-variant youth and currently chairs the DSM-V group revising this category. They appear to be heading toward advocating trans subsets of homosexual and paraphilic-- we'll know more after the APA meeting in SF next month. Don't get me started on the point that homosexuality used to be classified as a paraphilia... I need to take a breather from trying to explain to them what's going on here, so I appreciate your efforts!  +++$+++ Thanks again for your work on that article. Hfarmer and WhatamIdoing have equal levels of capability as scientists (and equally high "IQ" according to their user pages), which can make it a challenge to explain to them why this specific term needs to be distinguished from the phenomenon it attempts to describe. Their training and abilities make them see the world in a very specific and similar way. I recommend checking out Ellen Feder's analysis [http://books.google.com/books?id=6pcR4buMC00C&pg=PA109 here.] [[Kenneth Zucker]] has been a driving force behind the shift in the DSM from homosexuality to gender identity disorder (especially [[gender identity disorder in children]]). He is the leading voice of reparative therapy of gender-variant youth and currently chairs the DSM-V group revising this category. They appear to be heading toward advocating trans subsets of homosexual and paraphilic-- we'll know more after the APA meeting in SF next month. Don't get me started on the point that homosexuality used to be classified as a paraphilia... I need to take a breather from trying to explain to them what's going on here, so I appreciate your efforts! [[User:Jokestress|Jokestress]] ([[User talk:Jokestress|talk]]) 17:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
269962 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269961 +++$+++ 269961 +++$+++ 2009-04-30 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.241081520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the kind words! For one thing, I have been battling burnout for a long time. Second, and at least as important, I need to try to publish stuff, to help secure my career in the long-run. I.. may never be back as a heavy-hitting contributor. Or I may. I dunno. But either way, I appreciate your comments. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ * Thanks for the kind words! For one thing, I have been battling burnout for a long time. Second, and at least as important, I need to try to publish stuff, to help secure my career in the long-run. I.. may never be back as a heavy-hitting contributor. Or I may. I dunno. But either way, I appreciate your comments. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 01:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
269963 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269961 +++$+++ 269962 +++$+++ 2009-04-30 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.241081760E09 +++$+++ I hope you come back, as you are a true spirit. I hate it that you do not have access to English libraries. I worry about you now. &mdash; +++$+++ :* I hope you come back, as you are a true spirit. I hate it that you do not have access to English libraries. I worry about you now. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:56, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
269964 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269961 +++$+++ 269963 +++$+++ 2009-04-30 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.241082180E09 +++$+++ Worry? <blink, blink>. Absolutely no need for that... but thanks for the thought. :-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ ::* Worry? <blink, blink>. Absolutely no need for that... but thanks for the thought. :-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 02:03, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
269965 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269961 +++$+++ 269964 +++$+++ 2009-04-30 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.241082600E09 +++$+++ Ok. I don't want to worry. There is a dysphoric tone that perhaps I read into your words. I am glad to hear that I am wrong! &mdash; +++$+++ :::* Ok. I don't want to worry. There is a dysphoric tone that perhaps I read into your words. I am glad to hear that I am wrong! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
269966 +++$+++ Punkmorten +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269961 +++$+++ 269961 +++$+++ 2009-05-02 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.241327520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for copyediting the article! It needed a brushup.  +++$+++ *Thanks for copyediting the article! It needed a brushup. [[User:Punkmorten|Punkmorten]] ([[User talk:Punkmorten|talk]]) 22:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
269967 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269961 +++$+++ 269961 +++$+++ 2009-05-02 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.241327820E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. &mdash; +++$+++ :You are very welcome. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

7819 +++$+++ Naraht +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-18 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.305759840E09 +++$+++ Is it the position of Wikipedia that non-free articles of live people are not to be used at all? If so, then the primary difference is between a) removing it from articles where they have occured and then speedily deleting it and using non-use as the speedy reason, or b) attempting to delete it (for the fact that it is non-free, can that be done speedy?) and then clearing the articles afterward. The first may be the only way to quickly remove from all of wikipedia these pictures. Personally, using a picture broadcast on Television with deliberate removal of the Television station information seems like copyright infringement. +++$+++ Is it the position of Wikipedia that non-free articles of live people are not to be used at all? If so, then the primary difference is between a) removing it from articles where they have occured and then speedily deleting it and using non-use as the speedy reason, or b) attempting to delete it (for the fact that it is non-free, can that be done speedy?) and then clearing the articles afterward. The first may be the only way to quickly remove from all of wikipedia these pictures. Personally, using a picture broadcast on Television with deliberate removal of the Television station information seems like copyright infringement.[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 16:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
7820 +++$+++ Stwalkerster +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7819 +++$+++ 7819 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.305760320E09 +++$+++ Not sure if I'm reading you wrong or you got mixed up, but it's OK to have ''articles'' on live people, it's ok to have ''pictures'' of live people, but not ''non-free pictures'' of live people - simply because the image ''is'' replaceable with a free alternative. The best course of action IMHO is to remove then delete if the image is still unused - cos an image which is unacceptable for use in one article might still be acceptable in others. Yes, unused non-free images are speedily deletable, see the link I provided above. And yes, removing the banner is copyright violation IMHO, but I dunno what the procedure around that specific bit is. Hope that clarifies things :) '''<font face=\"Verdana\">&#91; +++$+++ :Not sure if I'm reading you wrong or you got mixed up, but it's OK to have ''articles'' on live people, it's ok to have ''pictures'' of live people, but not ''non-free pictures'' of live people - simply because the image ''is'' replaceable with a free alternative. The best course of action IMHO is to remove then delete if the image is still unused - cos an image which is unacceptable for use in one article might still be acceptable in others. Yes, unused non-free images are speedily deletable, see the link I provided above. And yes, removing the banner is copyright violation IMHO, but I dunno what the procedure around that specific bit is. Hope that clarifies things :) '''<font face="Verdana">&#91;[[User:Stwalkerster|<span style="color:black">stwalkerster</span>]]&#124;[[User talk:Stwalkerster|<span style="color:black">talk</span>]]&#93;</font>''' 16:12, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
7821 +++$+++ Naraht +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7819 +++$+++ 7820 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.305769380E09 +++$+++ So if the picture had also included someone who was dead, the picture could have been used on the dead person's page, but not the live person's page. So the process goes Step 1, delete the image from every live person in the photo. Step 2, is there place left it is used. If not, put in speedy delete. +++$+++ ::So if the picture had also included someone who was dead, the picture could have been used on the dead person's page, but not the live person's page. So the process goes Step 1, delete the image from every live person in the photo. Step 2, is there place left it is used. If not, put in speedy delete.[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 18:43, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
7822 +++$+++ SomeDudeWithAUserName +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7819 +++$+++ 7819 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.307094720E09 +++$+++ Another response! -- +++$+++ :Another response! --[[User:SomeDudeWithAUserName|<font color="#FF0000">Some</font><font color="FF6600">Dude</font><font color="3300CC">With</font><font color="CC6600">AUserName</font>]] ([[User talk:SomeDudeWithAUserName|talk with me!]]) 02:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
7823 +++$+++ Ichiro Kikuchi +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7819 +++$+++ 7819 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.307181780E09 +++$+++ Mr. Kintetsubuffalo!, I am a Wikipedian interested in Japanese culture. My interests are in [[leprosy]]\u3000and [[Okinawa]]. I read ''Revolution 1989, the fall of the Soviet Empire'' by Victor Sebestyen  and I found the effects of the revolution have been tremendous except in Japan. -- +++$+++ *Mr. Kintetsubuffalo!, I am a Wikipedian interested in Japanese culture. My interests are in [[leprosy]]　and [[Okinawa]]. I read ''Revolution 1989, the fall of the Soviet Empire'' by Victor Sebestyen  and I found the effects of the revolution have been tremendous except in Japan. --[[User:Ichiro Kikuchi|Ichiro Kikuchi]] ([[User talk:Ichiro Kikuchi|talk]]) 03:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

269969 +++$+++ Ceranthor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-01 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.241234340E09 +++$+++ AT [[Template talk:Did you know#Leon Ashley|this entry]] for DYK I asked if the site [[Allmusic]] was a reliable source, since it seems like a blog to me. The user said it was \"hardly\" a blog. Since I'm not such a referencing person, but you seem to be experienced in that field, what is your opinion? ''' +++$+++ AT [[Template talk:Did you know#Leon Ashley|this entry]] for DYK I asked if the site [[Allmusic]] was a reliable source, since it seems like a blog to me. The user said it was "hardly" a blog. Since I'm not such a referencing person, but you seem to be experienced in that field, what is your opinion? '''[[User:Ceranthor|<font color="#2F4F4F" face="Century">Ceran</font>]]'''[[User_talk:Ceranthor|<font color="#2F4F4F" face="Century">''thor''</font>]] 20:19, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
269970 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269969 +++$+++ 269969 +++$+++ 2009-05-01 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.241245680E09 +++$+++ It is not a blog. It is a reliable source for much infomation.  &mdash; +++$+++ : It is not a blog. It is a reliable source for much infomation.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

7826 +++$+++ Ufo karadagli +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7826 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-18 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.308414360E09 +++$+++ You need to attach the [[:File:Asociaci\xf3n de Grupos de Scouts de M\xe9xico.svg|image]] to an article as soon as possible since it is non-free.  +++$+++ You need to attach the [[:File:Asociación de Grupos de Scouts de México.svg|image]] to an article as soon as possible since it is non-free. [[User:Ufo karadagli|OCK]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Ufo karadagli|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Ufo karadagli|c]]) 09:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
7827 +++$+++ MissMJ +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7826 +++$+++ 7826 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.310560620E09 +++$+++ [[File:Chat-bubble3.jpg|30px]] - +++$+++ :[[File:Chat-bubble3.jpg|30px]] -[[User:MissMJ|MissMJ]] ([[User talk:MissMJ|talk]]) 05:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

269971 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-02 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.241305020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 15:57, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
269972 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269971 +++$+++ 269971 +++$+++ 2009-05-02 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.241308680E09 +++$+++ Hi Samir,  it looks like the article has already been deleted. I think the problem is that the article would have to be on a general subject, such as \"Death and adjustment hypotheses\" in which the theories of many individuals would be discussed. Wikipedia doesn't support a discussion of one person's theory in an article, unless that theory has received scientific support of others. Generally, articles on specific books are supported only if the book has received significant press coverage. Wikipedia has become stricter in this regard. Sincerely, &mdash; +++$+++ : Hi Samir,  it looks like the article has already been deleted. I think the problem is that the article would have to be on a general subject, such as "Death and adjustment hypotheses" in which the theories of many individuals would be discussed. Wikipedia doesn't support a discussion of one person's theory in an article, unless that theory has received scientific support of others. Generally, articles on specific books are supported only if the book has received significant press coverage. Wikipedia has become stricter in this regard. Sincerely, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:58, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
269973 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269971 +++$+++ 269972 +++$+++ 2009-05-02 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.241310720E09 +++$+++ Dear Mattisse, The article is still there. Please click [[Death and Adjustment Hypotheses]], you will find very established references this time and see if you want to participate in deletion discussion. Samir +++$+++ :: Dear Mattisse, The article is still there. Please click [[Death and Adjustment Hypotheses]], you will find very established references this time and see if you want to participate in deletion discussion. Samir[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 17:32, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
269974 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269971 +++$+++ 269973 +++$+++ 2009-05-02 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.241311980E09 +++$+++ I think that the article cannot be kept per the wikipedia rules. It is your original hypothesis, and unless you can show that it is generally accept by notable people in the field, it  falls under [[WP:OR]]. I am sorry. Even if I weighed in, it would do no good. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::I think that the article cannot be kept per the wikipedia rules. It is your original hypothesis, and unless you can show that it is generally accept by notable people in the field, it  falls under [[WP:OR]]. I am sorry. Even if I weighed in, it would do no good. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
269975 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269971 +++$+++ 269974 +++$+++ 2009-05-02 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.241312760E09 +++$+++ Ok, but as a good friend I must mention to you that this theory has been reviewed twice by the highest peer reviewed journal on death and now even McGraw-Hill company's text material sites about the theory. Ain't it enough to be a reliable topic for public reading? Anyway, I believe you have already seen the references and I respect your opinion as always!! Samir  +++$+++ :::: Ok, but as a good friend I must mention to you that this theory has been reviewed twice by the highest peer reviewed journal on death and now even McGraw-Hill company's text material sites about the theory. Ain't it enough to be a reliable topic for public reading? Anyway, I believe you have already seen the references and I respect your opinion as always!! Samir [[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 18:06, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

7829 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7829 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.309866360E09 +++$+++ I saw this comment of yours: \"VolunteerMarek-don't know what you're trying to pull, but Wikipedia is not censored and you are messing with the balance of this article. I will continue to undo you\"[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Jared_Taylor&diff=436576481&oldid=436568217]  Promising to revert war with an editor isn't good. May I suggest trying to find consensus on the talk page, or asking for mediation? &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ I saw this comment of yours: "VolunteerMarek-don't know what you're trying to pull, but Wikipedia is not censored and you are messing with the balance of this article. I will continue to undo you"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jared_Taylor&diff=436576481&oldid=436568217]  Promising to revert war with an editor isn't good. May I suggest trying to find consensus on the talk page, or asking for mediation? &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 04:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
7830 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7829 +++$+++ 7829 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.309910820E09 +++$+++ Done, I've applied for 3O, and thank you for the gentle hand. I'm tired of this place being a battleground anymore. Am I getting old, or was this just more fun five years ago?-- +++$+++ :Done, I've applied for 3O, and thank you for the gentle hand. I'm tired of this place being a battleground anymore. Am I getting old, or was this just more fun five years ago?--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 17:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
7831 +++$+++ Naraht +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7829 +++$+++ 7830 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.310000340E09 +++$+++ Often I find statements like this just before \"Wikibreak\"s happen... +++$+++ ::Often I find statements like this just before "Wikibreak"s happen...[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 17:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

532119 +++$+++ Nightstallion +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532119 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-30 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.170170940E09 +++$+++ Whatever it is, I'm glad for it -- but could you give me a brief summary so that I know what to be happy about? <tt>;)<\/tt> &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">Nightst<\/span>]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Nightstallion\/esperanza|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">a<\/span>]]<\/font> +++$+++ Whatever it is, I'm glad for it -- but could you give me a brief summary so that I know what to be happy about? <tt>;)</tt> &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightst</span>]]<font color="green">[[User:Nightstallion/esperanza|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">a</span>]]</font>[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">llion</span>]] [[User talk:Nightstallion|''(?)'']] 07:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
532120 +++$+++ Nightstallion +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532119 +++$+++ 532119 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.170171120E09 +++$+++ Also, [[Flag of Republika Srpska]] now states that the entities have until [[2007-07-27]] to design new flags and CoA... Is that true? If so, the other three articles should also state so... &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">Nightst<\/span>]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Nightstallion\/esperanza|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">a<\/span>]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Also, [[Flag of Republika Srpska]] now states that the entities have until [[2007-07-27]] to design new flags and CoA... Is that true? If so, the other three articles should also state so... &mdash;[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightst</span>]]<font color="green">[[User:Nightstallion/esperanza|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">a</span>]]</font>[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">llion</span>]] [[User talk:Nightstallion|''(?)'']] 07:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

269976 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-04 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.241455020E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, re [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Scientology\/Proposed_decision#Jayen466] \u2013 you were present at the time I had my spat with Voxpopulis. Did you think his complaint, cited in the linked proposal, was justified? I thought I had refuted it on the evidence page. Best, <font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, re [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Scientology/Proposed_decision#Jayen466] – you were present at the time I had my spat with Voxpopulis. Did you think his complaint, cited in the linked proposal, was justified? I thought I had refuted it on the evidence page. Best, <font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|Jayen]]</font>''<font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>'' 09:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
269977 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269976 +++$+++ 269976 +++$+++ 2009-05-04 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.241473020E09 +++$+++ I remember you from [[Idries Shah]] and [[Scientology in Germany]] and always found you a reasonable and accommodating editor, and not prone to edit warring. When I look at the arbitration over Scientology (the third no less), it is 99.99% about incidents that I know nothing about. What is the proposal in the link that you are referring to? I don't see Voxpopulis mentioned there, other than as a single purpose accout.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I remember you from [[Idries Shah]] and [[Scientology in Germany]] and always found you a reasonable and accommodating editor, and not prone to edit warring. When I look at the arbitration over Scientology (the third no less), it is 99.99% about incidents that I know nothing about. What is the proposal in the link that you are referring to? I don't see Voxpopulis mentioned there, other than as a single purpose accout.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
269978 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269976 +++$+++ 269977 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.241574180E09 +++$+++ Two of the diffs Roger cites (the third and fourth, currently numbered 56 and 57) lead to evidence sections by other editors that concern my behaviour in connection with the [[Scientology in Germany]] article. The latter one of those is by Voxpopulis. It cites a single diff. I am just writing a response to post on the Proposed decision talk page. <font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ ::Two of the diffs Roger cites (the third and fourth, currently numbered 56 and 57) lead to evidence sections by other editors that concern my behaviour in connection with the [[Scientology in Germany]] article. The latter one of those is by Voxpopulis. It cites a single diff. I am just writing a response to post on the Proposed decision talk page. <font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|Jayen]]</font>''<font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>'' 18:43, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

532121 +++$+++ Laughing Man +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532121 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-30 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.170208560E09 +++$+++ Did you happen to come across any English language sources regarding the status of national symbols in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska?   In the talk page [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Republika_Srpska&diff=104243277&oldid=104136679 you mentioned] that it is the final and latest decision, and that flags are being removed from official buildings.  I think this is a significant news but surprisingly I can not find any English language media that is reporting this.  Thanks. \/\/  +++$+++ Did you happen to come across any English language sources regarding the status of national symbols in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska?   In the talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Republika_Srpska&diff=104243277&oldid=104136679 you mentioned] that it is the final and latest decision, and that flags are being removed from official buildings.  I think this is a significant news but surprisingly I can not find any English language media that is reporting this.  Thanks. // [[User:Laughing Man|Laughing Man]] 17:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
532122 +++$+++ Laughing Man +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532121 +++$+++ 532121 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.170210000E09 +++$+++ Just an update, I did locate the English version of the Constitutional Court press release [http:\/\/www.ustavnisud.ba\/eng\/press\/index.php?pid=1381&sta=3&pkat=507], but still did not locate any source that is reporting on it which I still do not understand.  In any case, please let me know if you come across anything. Thanks :) \/\/  +++$+++ : Just an update, I did locate the English version of the Constitutional Court press release [http://www.ustavnisud.ba/eng/press/index.php?pid=1381&sta=3&pkat=507], but still did not locate any source that is reporting on it which I still do not understand.  In any case, please let me know if you come across anything. Thanks :) // [[User:Laughing Man|Laughing Man]] 18:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

269979 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-04 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.241482080E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, if we took Lucy to GAN, would you be interested in doing the honours. I feel confident you would give a vigerous, insightful but fair review, though if you are caught up with other committments I perfectly understand. Wiki is like that.  +++$+++ Mattisse, if we took Lucy to GAN, would you be interested in doing the honours. I feel confident you would give a vigerous, insightful but fair review, though if you are caught up with other committments I perfectly understand. Wiki is like that. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 17:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
269980 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269979 +++$+++ 269979 +++$+++ 2009-05-04 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.241489760E09 +++$+++ Yes, although only my undergraduate degree was in English. Fowler&Fowler knows more about the subject matter. I would be looking at the copy editing aspect.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes, although only my undergraduate degree was in English. Fowler&Fowler knows more about the subject matter. I would be looking at the copy editing aspect.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

269981 +++$+++ NYYfan1 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269981 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-05 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.241520060E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the GA review. I will do my best to address the issues you have outlined, but the edits may be slightly spaced out this week because I have the AP bio exam on Monday. However, I will try to work on the article. Once again, thank you.  +++$+++ Thank you for the GA review. I will do my best to address the issues you have outlined, but the edits may be slightly spaced out this week because I have the AP bio exam on Monday. However, I will try to work on the article. Once again, thank you. [[User:NYYfan1|NYYfan1]] ([[User talk:NYYfan1|talk]]) 03:41, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
269982 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269981 +++$+++ 269981 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.241556420E09 +++$+++ That's OK and long as I know you are working on it. The time limit is flexible. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :That's OK and long as I know you are working on it. The time limit is flexible. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:47, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

269983 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-05 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.241561760E09 +++$+++ Please do not link to copyrighted works, as you did here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ali%27s_Smile:_Naked_Scientology&diff=288065225&oldid=288056126]. Please take a moment to read [[WP:COPYLINKS]]. Thank you, ''' +++$+++ Please do not link to copyrighted works, as you did here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ali%27s_Smile:_Naked_Scientology&diff=288065225&oldid=288056126]. Please take a moment to read [[WP:COPYLINKS]]. Thank you, '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 15:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
269984 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269983 +++$+++ 269983 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.241562180E09 +++$+++ Sorry. Reading it is an eyeful though. Probably you do not want readers of the article to see the actual book. I was shocked reading it, as the article give no clue as to the nature of the writing in it. It is unlike the wonderful writing of ''Naked Lunch'', for example.  It shows how tilted and misleading the article on the book is. I don't think anyone who wrote the article actually read the book. I am not pro Scientology but Geometry guy has shown me the POV that exists on Wikipedia regarding it. I consider the article on this book extremely POV. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Sorry. Reading it is an eyeful though. Probably you do not want readers of the article to see the actual book. I was shocked reading it, as the article give no clue as to the nature of the writing in it. It is unlike the wonderful writing of ''Naked Lunch'', for example.  It shows how tilted and misleading the article on the book is. I don't think anyone who wrote the article actually read the book. I am not pro Scientology but Geometry guy has shown me the POV that exists on Wikipedia regarding it. I consider the article on this book extremely POV. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
269985 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269983 +++$+++ 269984 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.241562300E09 +++$+++ ''Probably you do not want readers of the article to see the actual book.'' Please [[WP:AGF]]. Comments like this are uncalled for. ''' +++$+++ ::''Probably you do not want readers of the article to see the actual book.'' Please [[WP:AGF]]. Comments like this are uncalled for. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 15:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
269986 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269983 +++$+++ 269985 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.241562660E09 +++$+++ Sorry. Please accept my apologies.  I believe that most people reading the book would realize how misleading the article is. However,  I will assume [[WP:AGF]] and accept that you are unaware of how at variance the books content and style of writing are with the picture of the book presented by the article. I am willing to accept that you are innocently acting in good faith.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Sorry. Please accept my apologies.  I believe that most people reading the book would realize how misleading the article is. However,  I will assume [[WP:AGF]] and accept that you are unaware of how at variance the books content and style of writing are with the picture of the book presented by the article. I am willing to accept that you are innocently acting in good faith.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
269987 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269983 +++$+++ 269986 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.241562720E09 +++$+++ Thank you. ''' +++$+++ ::::Thank you. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 15:32, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

7841 +++$+++ Drilnoth +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.311625920E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Kintetsubuffalo}} your upload log]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:image use policy|image use policy]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> \u2013 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Kintetsubuffalo}} your upload log]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:image use policy|image use policy]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]]) 13:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
7842 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7841 +++$+++ 7841 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.311626520E09 +++$+++ Deletionist wikilawyers, the scourge of Wikipedia.-- +++$+++ :Deletionist wikilawyers, the scourge of Wikipedia.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo#top|talk]]) 13:42, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

532131 +++$+++ Kahriman +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532131 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-01 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.170392640E09 +++$+++ Seferovi\u0107u, onaj Nlu ne\u0107e da vrati verziju (kakvi ovdje postaju administratori :)), al ka\u017ee da pitamo nekog drugog administratora da vrati verziju. Po\u0161to si ti upu\u0107eniji od mene u politiku en wikipedije, haj molim te pitaj na nekom grupnom mjestu da vrate verziju (i sve potanko objasni :)) -- +++$+++ Seferoviću, onaj Nlu neće da vrati verziju (kakvi ovdje postaju administratori :)), al kaže da pitamo nekog drugog administratora da vrati verziju. Pošto si ti upućeniji od mene u politiku en wikipedije, haj molim te pitaj na nekom grupnom mjestu da vrate verziju (i sve potanko objasni :)) --[[User:Kahriman|Kahriman]] 21:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
532132 +++$+++ Kahriman +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532131 +++$+++ 532131 +++$+++ 2007-02-01 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.170398880E09 +++$+++ evo javio ti se neko, pa probaj to rije\u0161iti. Situacija postaje apsurdna... -- +++$+++ :evo javio ti se neko, pa probaj to riješiti. Situacija postaje apsurdna... --[[User:Kahriman|Kahriman]] 22:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

7844 +++$+++ Edwtie +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7844 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.312328520E09 +++$+++ I was been in 22nd worldjamboree in Sweden. I have talked with organisators of future worldjamboree. they have made known: Unlock new world. It will be a theme on 24th Worldjamboree in America.  http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/27662315@N02\/5916614694\/  +++$+++ I was been in 22nd worldjamboree in Sweden. I have talked with organisators of future worldjamboree. they have made known: Unlock new world. It will be a theme on 24th Worldjamboree in America.  http://www.flickr.com/photos/27662315@N02/5916614694/ [[User:Edwtie|Edwtie]] ([[User talk:Edwtie|talk]]) 16:42, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
7845 +++$+++ LonelyBeacon +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ 7844 +++$+++ 7844 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.312342080E09 +++$+++ I see there seems to be some issues at this article.  I am not an expert on the particulars, but I would like to offer my services as a mediator.  I started an entry at the article talk page, and I hope you will explain all of your concerns regarding edits being made there.  +++$+++ :I see there seems to be some issues at this article.  I am not an expert on the particulars, but I would like to offer my services as a mediator.  I started an entry at the article talk page, and I hope you will explain all of your concerns regarding edits being made there. [[User:LonelyBeacon|LonelyBeacon]] ([[User talk:LonelyBeacon|talk]]) 20:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

532133 +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532133 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-01 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.170396120E09 +++$+++ I have an issue with an admin. Actually several users have issues. I request a fair admin that has minimal bias and that follows general wiki policies. Please help. Even that admin has told another user to look for a different admin... Thanks,  +++$+++ I have an issue with an admin. Actually several users have issues. I request a fair admin that has minimal bias and that follows general wiki policies. Please help. Even that admin has told another user to look for a different admin... Thanks, [[User:Kseferovic|Vseferović]] 22:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
532134 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532133 +++$+++ 532133 +++$+++ 2007-02-01 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.170396600E09 +++$+++ You could try [[WP:Mediation]] or [[WP:RFC]].  +++$+++ :You could try [[WP:Mediation]] or [[WP:RFC]]. [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Xiner|email]]) 22:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

269990 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269990 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-05 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.241586960E09 +++$+++ Noticed this.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment\/Ali%27s_Smile:_Naked_Scientology\/1&curid=22693784&diff=288144761&oldid=288143169]  A followup at [[Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review\/Ali's_Smile:_Naked_Scientology\/archive1]] is relevant: the quote you have been citing is taken out of context, and was provided without a relevant disclosure.  Best regards, <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Noticed this.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Ali%27s_Smile:_Naked_Scientology/1&curid=22693784&diff=288144761&oldid=288143169]  A followup at [[Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review/Ali's_Smile:_Naked_Scientology/archive1]] is relevant: the quote you have been citing is taken out of context, and was provided without a relevant disclosure.  Best regards, <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 22:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
269991 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269990 +++$+++ 269990 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.241587260E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much! (I am afraid I don't know quite what you are referring to, but thanks anyway.) I am being overwhelmed with admins entering into my affairs to day. I believe you are the third in the last hour. Jennevica, Flonight, you. I may be forgetting someone.  There must be a network alerting admins to comment to me!  Who will be next??!! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you so much! (I am afraid I don't know quite what you are referring to, but thanks anyway.) I am being overwhelmed with admins entering into my affairs to day. I believe you are the third in the last hour. Jennevica, Flonight, you. I may be forgetting someone.  There must be a network alerting admins to comment to me!  Who will be next??!! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
269992 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269990 +++$+++ 269991 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.241588640E09 +++$+++ Disgraced former admin, actually.  The lowly sort who drags her knuckles and grunts out commentary in between submitting featured picture nominations.  Really, your work on the content side is superb.  If you'd slow down please and discuss the availability of reliable reception sources at the peer review that started this dispute, all of this will probably come to a very simple and congenial resolution.  The best of us have seen red on occasion; I'm no exception either.  Most fellow editors would far rather see this come to a productive end.  Best wishes, <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Disgraced former admin, actually.  The lowly sort who drags her knuckles and grunts out commentary in between submitting featured picture nominations.  Really, your work on the content side is superb.  If you'd slow down please and discuss the availability of reliable reception sources at the peer review that started this dispute, all of this will probably come to a very simple and congenial resolution.  The best of us have seen red on occasion; I'm no exception either.  Most fellow editors would far rather see this come to a productive end.  Best wishes, <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 22:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
269993 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269990 +++$+++ 269992 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.241589240E09 +++$+++ It is not possible. I cannot comment there any more, nor on the article talk page.  I tried there and got nowhere. I was outnumbered by at least five to one. And now they are all coming out of the woodwork, defending the article. I asked one editor his opinion for the GAR and that was posted as if I were canvasing. The GAR was closed down by Jennevica who removed it from the talk page. This is a nasty business. If I criticize the article, I am accused of bad faith. An AN\/I thread was opened because I dared to take a stance in the peer review. MY RFC  was brought up and discussed. It is not worth ever saying anything about the FAC editor's articles, no matter what. I should know that by now. If I am driven off Wikipedia, it will be a blessing. It is too dangerous to do GA reviews.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::It is not possible. I cannot comment there any more, nor on the article talk page.  I tried there and got nowhere. I was outnumbered by at least five to one. And now they are all coming out of the woodwork, defending the article. I asked one editor his opinion for the GAR and that was posted as if I were canvasing. The GAR was closed down by Jennevica who removed it from the talk page. This is a nasty business. If I criticize the article, I am accused of bad faith. An AN/I thread was opened because I dared to take a stance in the peer review. MY RFC  was brought up and discussed. It is not worth ever saying anything about the FAC editor's articles, no matter what. I should know that by now. If I am driven off Wikipedia, it will be a blessing. It is too dangerous to do GA reviews.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

7847 +++$+++ MariaPopovici +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7847 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.310485860E09 +++$+++ Hi! Thanks very much for your help so far with my name change request, as you can see it has been approved. You mentioned on my request that you would be willing to help me out with the article I am trying to write on Forum Invest, which is currently missing third party confirmation to make it credible. If you could take a look at the article and let me know where you think I should start adding and changing things I would be really grateful. I know you're very busy so any help however small will be very appreciated :) thanks!  +++$+++ Hi! Thanks very much for your help so far with my name change request, as you can see it has been approved. You mentioned on my request that you would be willing to help me out with the article I am trying to write on Forum Invest, which is currently missing third party confirmation to make it credible. If you could take a look at the article and let me know where you think I should start adding and changing things I would be really grateful. I know you're very busy so any help however small will be very appreciated :) thanks! [[User:MariaPopovici|MariaPopovici]] ([[User talk:MariaPopovici|talk]]) 08:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7848 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7847 +++$+++ 7847 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310487480E09 +++$+++ Hi. Sure, I'll be happy to help - I've had a quick look at it at [[User:MariaPopovici\/Forum Invest]], and it first needs some reliable sources and then needs a bit of rewriting so that people don't see it as too promotional. I'm probably a bit too busy today, but I'll see what I can do over the next few days. If you want to work on it yourself first, I'd suggest the first thing to do would be some web searching to see if you can find anything that satisfies the [[WP:RS|reliable source]] requirements - just list whatever you find in the References section and we can convert them to proper refs later. English language sources would be preferable, but Romanian ones would be acceptable too - Google translate does Romanian, and that should be enough to get a basic understanding of a translation --  +++$+++ :Hi. Sure, I'll be happy to help - I've had a quick look at it at [[User:MariaPopovici/Forum Invest]], and it first needs some reliable sources and then needs a bit of rewriting so that people don't see it as too promotional. I'm probably a bit too busy today, but I'll see what I can do over the next few days. If you want to work on it yourself first, I'd suggest the first thing to do would be some web searching to see if you can find anything that satisfies the [[WP:RS|reliable source]] requirements - just list whatever you find in the References section and we can convert them to proper refs later. English language sources would be preferable, but Romanian ones would be acceptable too - Google translate does Romanian, and that should be enough to get a basic understanding of a translation -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 09:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7849 +++$+++ MariaPopovici +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7847 +++$+++ 7848 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.310492640E09 +++$+++ I added a bunch of links with some text to explain who they relate to. They are mainly in Romanian (sorry about that!) and are news articles about the forums organized by Forum Invest and confirm that the list of people invited actually happened. Are these the type of sources that help with the article? It is quite difficult to find publications to reference, so I hope we are not in dire need of them. Are good quality videos of the conferences a valuable resource? They can confirm that all the people on the list attended the events organized by Forum Invest. I will also add in a section about the founder, his CV almost, take a look if you can and if it is not necessary then let me know and I can remove it. Thanks so much!  +++$+++ :: I added a bunch of links with some text to explain who they relate to. They are mainly in Romanian (sorry about that!) and are news articles about the forums organized by Forum Invest and confirm that the list of people invited actually happened. Are these the type of sources that help with the article? It is quite difficult to find publications to reference, so I hope we are not in dire need of them. Are good quality videos of the conferences a valuable resource? They can confirm that all the people on the list attended the events organized by Forum Invest. I will also add in a section about the founder, his CV almost, take a look if you can and if it is not necessary then let me know and I can remove it. Thanks so much! [[User:MariaPopovici|MariaPopovici]] ([[User talk:MariaPopovici|talk]]) 10:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7850 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7847 +++$+++ 7849 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310493360E09 +++$+++ Hi. I won't have time today, but just one important point - Wikipedia relies on notability, so what we want is sources verifying that a topic has been covered in some depth by others, not just that a topic exists and is accurate - have a look at [[WP:N]] for notability guidance. A section about the founder might be too much, unless he is independently notable and covered by reliable sources in his own right --  +++$+++ :::Hi. I won't have time today, but just one important point - Wikipedia relies on notability, so what we want is sources verifying that a topic has been covered in some depth by others, not just that a topic exists and is accurate - have a look at [[WP:N]] for notability guidance. A section about the founder might be too much, unless he is independently notable and covered by reliable sources in his own right -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 10:56, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7851 +++$+++ MariaPopovici +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7847 +++$+++ 7850 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.310855580E09 +++$+++ Hey. I am going to be away for about 10\/14 days so I will not be able to edit much on here. But if you are still willing to help out I will drop you a line when I get back. Is that alright? Thanks for all your help so far!  +++$+++ ::::Hey. I am going to be away for about 10/14 days so I will not be able to edit much on here. But if you are still willing to help out I will drop you a line when I get back. Is that alright? Thanks for all your help so far! [[User:MariaPopovici|MariaPopovici]] ([[User talk:MariaPopovici|talk]]) 15:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
7852 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7847 +++$+++ 7851 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310856900E09 +++$+++ Hi. Yes, that would be fine. I'm sorry I haven't had a chance to help this week, but I've been very busy with a lot of other Wikipedia things. I'll try to have a look over the article while you're away - and yes, please let me know when you're back --  +++$+++ :::::Hi. Yes, that would be fine. I'm sorry I haven't had a chance to help this week, but I've been very busy with a lot of other Wikipedia things. I'll try to have a look over the article while you're away - and yes, please let me know when you're back -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 15:55, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
7853 +++$+++ MariaPopovici +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7847 +++$+++ 7852 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312224960E09 +++$+++ Hello. I am back now and will be working on the Forum Invest article this week. I hope that you will be able to help and look over some of the links I have added to support the article, if you have some time. I am also waiting on some links from more notable European Institutions which have mentioned the company so that I can add them as well. I will also work on rewording some of the text so that it does not match the company's website. As usual, any help that you can provide is greatly appreciated, please let me know of any changes I can make to ensure the article complies with all of Wikipedia's regulations.  +++$+++ ::::::Hello. I am back now and will be working on the Forum Invest article this week. I hope that you will be able to help and look over some of the links I have added to support the article, if you have some time. I am also waiting on some links from more notable European Institutions which have mentioned the company so that I can add them as well. I will also work on rewording some of the text so that it does not match the company's website. As usual, any help that you can provide is greatly appreciated, please let me know of any changes I can make to ensure the article complies with all of Wikipedia's regulations. [[User:MariaPopovici|MariaPopovici]] ([[User talk:MariaPopovici|talk]]) 11:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

269994 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-05 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.241587380E09 +++$+++ For your own sake, you need to cool it. Read a book, watch a vid, or even review an article that's actually good. -- +++$+++ For your own sake, you need to cool it. Read a book, watch a vid, or even review an article that's actually good. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 22:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
269995 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 269994 +++$+++ 269994 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.241587500E09 +++$+++ OK. Thanks! &mdash; +++$+++ :OK. Thanks! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

7854 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.310488080E09 +++$+++ I've been reported by a ''new user'' for edit warring on [[Kurmi]]. This happened while I was writing up an SPI. Brief outline of circumstances are at [[User_talk:SpacemanSpiff#Another possible sock]]. -  +++$+++ I've been reported by a ''new user'' for edit warring on [[Kurmi]]. This happened while I was writing up an SPI. Brief outline of circumstances are at [[User_talk:SpacemanSpiff#Another possible sock]]. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 09:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7855 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310489700E09 +++$+++ Sigh. I've commented at the 3RR report --  +++$+++ :Sigh. I've commented at the 3RR report -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 09:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7856 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 7855 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.310490060E09 +++$+++ Sorry. It is such a waste of productive time for you, me and others. It seems to be spreading and I am starting to wonder if there may be some sort of offwiki thing going on that basically involves getting people to stalk me. I am not paranoid but they ''are'' out to get me. <g> -  +++$+++ ::Sorry. It is such a waste of productive time for you, me and others. It seems to be spreading and I am starting to wonder if there may be some sort of offwiki thing going on that basically involves getting people to stalk me. I am not paranoid but they ''are'' out to get me. <g> - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 10:01, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7857 +++$+++ TomPaul67 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 10:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310490960E09 +++$+++ Hi, please check the timestamp to verify what Sitush has been saying. He was reported earlier for violating 3RR rule, and then he made this report to you and the socket puppet report. Please help.  +++$+++ : Hi, please check the timestamp to verify what Sitush has been saying. He was reported earlier for violating 3RR rule, and then he made this report to you and the socket puppet report. Please help. [[User:TomPaul67|TomPaul67]] ([[User talk:TomPaul67|talk]]) 10:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7858 +++$+++ SpacemanSpiff +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310521620E09 +++$+++ Pssst...in cases like this I think TP redirection per [[WP:SPI\/AI]] would be appropriate. I rarely do it, but cases like this merit it I think. cheers. &mdash; +++$+++ *Pssst...in cases like this I think TP redirection per [[WP:SPI/AI]] would be appropriate. I rarely do it, but cases like this merit it I think. cheers. &mdash;[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#BA181F">Spaceman</font>]]'''[[User_talk:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#2B18BA">Spiff</font>]]''' 18:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7859 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 7858 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.310521860E09 +++$+++ :Do you think so? I was thinking the duck evidence should be kept easily visible, as he's almost certain to be back --  +++$+++ *:Do you think so? I was thinking the duck evidence should be kept easily visible, as he's almost certain to be back -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 18:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7860 +++$+++ SpacemanSpiff +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 7859 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.310522040E09 +++$+++ ::Hmmm, I hold the other view I guess: I think ducks go well with beans! But I understand where you're coming from. cheers. &mdash; +++$+++ *::Hmmm, I hold the other view I guess: I think ducks go well with beans! But I understand where you're coming from. cheers. &mdash;[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#BA181F">Spaceman</font>]]'''[[User_talk:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#2B18BA">Spiff</font>]]''' 18:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7861 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 7860 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.310522580E09 +++$+++ :::Ducks, beans ... and now elephants. I do not have a memory such as elephants are alleged to have & comparing beans is a necessary act for me. If the beans are hidden in the history of the duck then I would be even less clueful than my present state, or at least put to slightly more work for no reason that I can understand to be necessary. Am I missing something here? The elephant in the room, perhaps? -  +++$+++ *:::Ducks, beans ... and now elephants. I do not have a memory such as elephants are alleged to have & comparing beans is a necessary act for me. If the beans are hidden in the history of the duck then I would be even less clueful than my present state, or at least put to slightly more work for no reason that I can understand to be necessary. Am I missing something here? The elephant in the room, perhaps? - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 19:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7862 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 7861 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310522880E09 +++$+++ ::::I understand the other view too - balance between spilling them to the miscreant, and leaving them for others to see. I agree it's tricky. Anyway, all this talk is making me hungry - I had beans with breakfast, so I might go to the Chinese takeaway and get some duck (I don't think they do elephant) --  +++$+++ *::::I understand the other view too - balance between spilling them to the miscreant, and leaving them for others to see. I agree it's tricky. Anyway, all this talk is making me hungry - I had beans with breakfast, so I might go to the Chinese takeaway and get some duck (I don't think they do elephant) -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 19:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7863 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 7862 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310523240E09 +++$+++ :::::No elephant but they may have some powdered rhino in a brown bag under the counter. Cash only. -  +++$+++ *:::::No elephant but they may have some powdered rhino in a brown bag under the counter. Cash only. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 19:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7864 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7854 +++$+++ 7863 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.310529840E09 +++$+++ ::::::Hmm, perhaps not at the end of a long and tiring day. I went for the duck. And from the shop next door, a bottle of wine, which I'm now about to magically turn into an empty bottle - so I will bid thee all a good night --  +++$+++ *::::::Hmm, perhaps not at the end of a long and tiring day. I went for the duck. And from the shop next door, a bottle of wine, which I'm now about to magically turn into an empty bottle - so I will bid thee all a good night -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 21:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

525597 +++$+++ Wright93 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-31 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.199127600E09 +++$+++ So why can't I put my signiature on my work?    -- +++$+++ So why can't I put my signiature on my work?    --[[User:Wright93|Dr.J.Wright MD]] ([[User talk:Wright93|talk]]) 11:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
525598 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525597 +++$+++ 525597 +++$+++ 2007-12-31 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.199155920E09 +++$+++ Please read [[Wikipedia:Signatures]] -- \"Edits on main Wikipedia article pages should not be signed\u2014the article is a shared work based on the contributions of many people and one editor should not be singled out above others.\" -- +++$+++ :Please read [[Wikipedia:Signatures]] -- "Edits on main Wikipedia article pages should not be signed—the article is a shared work based on the contributions of many people and one editor should not be singled out above others." --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 18:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

270000 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-06 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.241658660E09 +++$+++ {{arbcom notice|Mattisse}} Mattisse, I've opened this primarily in response to the most recent ANI thread.  I know that, in your opinion, your actions are reasonable and the other editors are biased against you.  I hope that the arbitration hearing can determine whether that is in fact the case - perhaps my own behavior or that of others needs to be modified and we just haven't realized it.  This is by no means an attempt to drive you from Wikipedia or get you banned, just to clear up the misunderstanding on whether there is a problem.  +++$+++ {{arbcom notice|Mattisse}} Mattisse, I've opened this primarily in response to the most recent ANI thread.  I know that, in your opinion, your actions are reasonable and the other editors are biased against you.  I hope that the arbitration hearing can determine whether that is in fact the case - perhaps my own behavior or that of others needs to be modified and we just haven't realized it.  This is by no means an attempt to drive you from Wikipedia or get you banned, just to clear up the misunderstanding on whether there is a problem. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 18:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270001 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270000 +++$+++ 270000 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.241659560E09 +++$+++ That is fine if that is your feeling. I will not defend myself. I don't have the stomach for it. Whatever happens,  I will cut back my editing according.  &mdash; +++$+++ :That is fine if that is your feeling. I will not defend myself. I don't have the stomach for it. Whatever happens,  I will cut back my editing according.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:26, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

532145 +++$+++ Rémih +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532145 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-03 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.172951880E09 +++$+++ You can answer me on en: or fr: wiki. Thank you very much.  +++$+++ You can answer me on en: or fr: wiki. Thank you very much. [[User:Rémih|Rémih]] 11:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
532146 +++$+++ Rémih +++$+++ Kseferovic +++$+++ 532145 +++$+++ 532145 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.173197040E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Bye.  +++$+++ :Thanks. Bye. [[User:Rémih|Rémih]] 08:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

270003 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270003 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.241672940E09 +++$+++ OK. I know that I am not wanted here. I would prefer to have the option of entering comments into the Arbitration against me, but that is not necessary. Thank you for ending my misery. &mdash; +++$+++ OK. I know that I am not wanted here. I would prefer to have the option of entering comments into the Arbitration against me, but that is not necessary. Thank you for ending my misery. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270004 +++$+++ Tznkai +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270003 +++$+++ 270003 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.241673060E09 +++$+++ Make your comments here, and I'm sure an Arbitration Committee clerk will be happy to transcribe them for you.-- +++$+++ :Make your comments here, and I'm sure an Arbitration Committee clerk will be happy to transcribe them for you.--[[User:Tznkai|Tznkai]] ([[User talk:Tznkai|talk]]) 22:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270005 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270003 +++$+++ 270004 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.241673240E09 +++$+++ I'd be interested in seeing a fuller rationale than \"We're done here\".-- +++$+++ ::I'd be interested in seeing a fuller rationale than "We're done here".--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 22:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270006 +++$+++ Tznkai +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270003 +++$+++ 270005 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.241673300E09 +++$+++ Linked above.-- +++$+++ :::Linked above.--[[User:Tznkai|Tznkai]] ([[User talk:Tznkai|talk]]) 22:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270007 +++$+++ Iridescent +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270003 +++$+++ 270006 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.241673540E09 +++$+++ I have to agree with Wehwalt. I have no horse in this race \u2013 AFAIK I've never had the slightest interaction with Mattisse other than seeing the occasional comment of hers on talkpages, and am only here in the first place to see what all the fuss is about \u2013 but \"we're done here\" with a link to your own statement at Arbcom seems very dubious grounds for an indefblock, especially when Arbcom's already considering her case.&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;<font style=\"font-family: Zapfino, Segoe Script\"><font color=\"#E45E05\"> +++$+++ ::::I have to agree with Wehwalt. I have no horse in this race – AFAIK I've never had the slightest interaction with Mattisse other than seeing the occasional comment of hers on talkpages, and am only here in the first place to see what all the fuss is about – but "we're done here" with a link to your own statement at Arbcom seems very dubious grounds for an indefblock, especially when Arbcom's already considering her case.&nbsp;–&nbsp;<font style="font-family: Zapfino, Segoe Script"><font color="#E45E05">[[User:Iridescent|iride]]</font><font color="#C1118C">[[User talk:Iridescent|scent]]</font></font> 22:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270008 +++$+++ Synergy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270003 +++$+++ 270003 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.241673840E09 +++$+++ I object to the indef, I think it was a bit too drastic and should be reduced. I also object to the blocking admins \"we're done here\" and he isn't even an uninvolved admin! ''' +++$+++ :I object to the indef, I think it was a bit too drastic and should be reduced. I also object to the blocking admins "we're done here" and he isn't even an uninvolved admin! '''[[User:Synergy|<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Syn</font>]]'''[[User_talk:Synergy|<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">ergy</font>]] 22:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

87552 +++$+++ leevanjackson +++$+++ Leevanjackson +++$+++ 87552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-12 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.294893120E09 +++$+++ [[List of common misconceptions]] has alcohol is healthy line, dbl check.  +++$+++ [[List of common misconceptions]] has alcohol is healthy line, dbl check. [[user:leevanjackson|Lee&there4;V]] [[User talk:leevanjackson|<font color="#a3bfb1">(talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/leevanjackson|<font color="#a3bfb1">contribs)]]</font> 20:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
87553 +++$+++ Garrondo +++$+++ Leevanjackson +++$+++ 87552 +++$+++ 87552 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.295449740E09 +++$+++ -) I hope to hear your comments during FAC. -- +++$+++ :-) I hope to hear your comments during FAC. --[[User:Garrondo|Garrondo]] ([[User talk:Garrondo|talk]]) 07:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
87554 +++$+++ leevanjackson +++$+++ Leevanjackson +++$+++ 87552 +++$+++ 87552 +++$+++ 2011-02-23 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.298498940E09 +++$+++ That's all right - my comments are really suggestions for a second opinion and not solid comments, have been inundated recently to help as much as I wished...!  +++$+++ :That's all right - my comments are really suggestions for a second opinion and not solid comments, have been inundated recently to help as much as I wished...! [[user:leevanjackson|Lee&there4;V]] [[User talk:leevanjackson|<font color="#a3bfb1">(talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/leevanjackson|<font color="#a3bfb1">contribs)]]</font> 14:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

7865 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7865 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.310496000E09 +++$+++ I am inclined to get some other admins involved in these issues. Fut. Perf and Salvio have both stepped in recently & I feel that if we spread the load a little then perhaps the message might start sinking in. Is it ok with you if I float the idea with them? -  +++$+++ I am inclined to get some other admins involved in these issues. Fut. Perf and Salvio have both stepped in recently & I feel that if we spread the load a little then perhaps the message might start sinking in. Is it ok with you if I float the idea with them? - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 11:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7866 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7865 +++$+++ 7865 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.310496180E09 +++$+++ Oh yes, definitely, please - more hands would be very much welcomed at the pump --  +++$+++ :Oh yes, definitely, please - more hands would be very much welcomed at the pump -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 11:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7867 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7865 +++$+++ 7866 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310496420E09 +++$+++ And I've reverted further at [[Yadav]] --  +++$+++ ::And I've reverted further at [[Yadav]] -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 11:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7868 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7865 +++$+++ 7867 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.310508420E09 +++$+++ {{ec}}I have contacted both the admins named above. I am also going to be keeping an eye on {{u|Amitkumar900}}, who came out unconnected in the SPI at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/Shannon1488]] but I think probably should have been included in the one at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/Sumitkachroo]]. They have not done many edits yet but the account was created within hours of Sumitkachroo being blocked, they have just responded to a really old article talk page point made by Sumitkachroo & have a another similarity probably best considered to be of the [[WP:BEANS|beans]] variety. Will see what develops. -  +++$+++ :::{{ec}}I have contacted both the admins named above. I am also going to be keeping an eye on {{u|Amitkumar900}}, who came out unconnected in the SPI at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Shannon1488]] but I think probably should have been included in the one at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sumitkachroo]]. They have not done many edits yet but the account was created within hours of Sumitkachroo being blocked, they have just responded to a really old article talk page point made by Sumitkachroo & have a another similarity probably best considered to be of the [[WP:BEANS|beans]] variety. Will see what develops. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 15:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7869 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7865 +++$+++ 7868 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310508480E09 +++$+++ Already on my list ;-) --  +++$+++ ::::Already on my list ;-) -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 15:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7870 +++$+++ Salvio giuliano +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7865 +++$+++ 7869 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310531040E09 +++$+++ Just dropping by to let you know I've added the various pages to my watchlist and that I'll be happy to lend a hand when I can, although lately I've not had as much time for Wikipedia as I'd like: when I'm online, I'll be happy to earn my 12 grands too... {{=)|5}} <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml\">  ''' +++$+++ :::::Just dropping by to let you know I've added the various pages to my watchlist and that I'll be happy to lend a hand when I can, although lately I've not had as much time for Wikipedia as I'd like: when I'm online, I'll be happy to earn my 12 grands too... {{=)|5}} <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">  '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> [[User talk:Salvio giuliano| <sup>Let's talk about it!</sup>]] 21:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7871 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7865 +++$+++ 7870 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310531340E09 +++$+++ That's great, thanks, and much appreciated - I'll pass your name on to our paymaster --  +++$+++ ::::::That's great, thanks, and much appreciated - I'll pass your name on to our paymaster -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 21:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7872 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7865 +++$+++ 7871 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.310537340E09 +++$+++ I second those thanks. I wouldn't start ordering your new car or whatever just yet, though, as Prince appears to be more of a pauper when it comes to actually paying out the profits from his rubber plantations. -  +++$+++ :::::::I second those thanks. I wouldn't start ordering your new car or whatever just yet, though, as Prince appears to be more of a pauper when it comes to actually paying out the profits from his rubber plantations. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 23:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7873 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7865 +++$+++ 7865 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310509620E09 +++$+++ You were told that all you needed to do was explain your concerns on the article Talk page, and provide a reliable source which supports your claims and discredits the sourced material you wanted to remove - then if a consensus agrees with you after discussion, the article can be changed. But you chose instead to make a legal threat, and so I have no option but to indefinitely block your account as per [[WP:NLT]]. You will not achieve anything here by threats and bluster, but if you are prepared to withdraw your legal threat and, instead, discuss the issue in a civil and constructive manner at [[Talk:Yadav]], I will be happy to unblock you - please feel free to respond on your Talk page, which I am watching --  +++$+++ :You were told that all you needed to do was explain your concerns on the article Talk page, and provide a reliable source which supports your claims and discredits the sourced material you wanted to remove - then if a consensus agrees with you after discussion, the article can be changed. But you chose instead to make a legal threat, and so I have no option but to indefinitely block your account as per [[WP:NLT]]. You will not achieve anything here by threats and bluster, but if you are prepared to withdraw your legal threat and, instead, discuss the issue in a civil and constructive manner at [[Talk:Yadav]], I will be happy to unblock you - please feel free to respond on your Talk page, which I am watching -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 15:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
7874 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7865 +++$+++ 7873 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.310510100E09 +++$+++ Oh, and as a technical correction, there are only around 1.2 billion people in the whole of India, so there can't be 10 billion Yadav - did you mean 10 million? --  +++$+++ ::Oh, and as a technical correction, there are only around 1.2 billion people in the whole of India, so there can't be 10 billion Yadav - did you mean 10 million? -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 15:35, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

270010 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270010 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.241674080E09 +++$+++ Tznkai, I suggest you unblock Mattise or let another admin do it in order for her to be able to defend herself in case the case is accepted. --  +++$+++ Tznkai, I suggest you unblock Mattise or let another admin do it in order for her to be able to defend herself in case the case is accepted. -- [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small><sup>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: Grey"><font color="white">''Wiki me up''® </font></font>]]</sup></small> 22:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270011 +++$+++ Tznkai +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270010 +++$+++ 270010 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.241674260E09 +++$+++ Sure.-- +++$+++ :Sure.--[[User:Tznkai|Tznkai]] ([[User talk:Tznkai|talk]]) 22:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270012 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270010 +++$+++ 270011 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.241674440E09 +++$+++ Thanks. --  +++$+++ ::Thanks. -- [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small><sup>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: Grey"><font color="white">''Wiki me up''® </font></font>]]</sup></small> 22:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270013 +++$+++ Tznkai +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270010 +++$+++ 270012 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.241674920E09 +++$+++ If you think it is necessary, but I think its somewhat moot now.-- +++$+++ :::If you think it is necessary, but I think its somewhat moot now.--[[User:Tznkai|Tznkai]] ([[User talk:Tznkai|talk]]) 22:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270014 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270010 +++$+++ 270011 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.241674680E09 +++$+++ It is OK, Tznkai. I don't understand your comments about why you blocked me but, in any event,  clearly the community dislikes me and does not want me here. The passion I felt for editing and contributing is the same passion that got me into trouble. I do not want to continue where I am so clearly not wanted. Thank you. &mdash; +++$+++ ::It is OK, Tznkai. I don't understand your comments about why you blocked me but, in any event,  clearly the community dislikes me and does not want me here. The passion I felt for editing and contributing is the same passion that got me into trouble. I do not want to continue where I am so clearly not wanted. Thank you. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:38, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270015 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270010 +++$+++ 270014 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.241674800E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I for one value you as a colleague.  I would like your help in building an encyclopedia.-- +++$+++ :::Mattisse, I for one value you as a colleague.  I would like your help in building an encyclopedia.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 22:40, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270016 +++$+++ Laser_brain +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270010 +++$+++ 270014 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.241674920E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I sometimes don't agree with your methods of dispute resolution but I'd say it's pretty clear that a lot of people value your contributions. That's why we're here, right? Contributions. So, I urge you to participate in the ArbCom case if accepted, if for no other reason than to clearly state your intentions here and get everything out in the open. -- +++$+++ :::Mattisse, I sometimes don't agree with your methods of dispute resolution but I'd say it's pretty clear that a lot of people value your contributions. That's why we're here, right? Contributions. So, I urge you to participate in the ArbCom case if accepted, if for no other reason than to clearly state your intentions here and get everything out in the open. --[[User:Laser_brain|<font color="purple">'''Laser brain'''</font >]] [[User_talk:Laser_brain|<font color="purple">(talk)</font >]] 22:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270017 +++$+++ Dylan620 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270010 +++$+++ 270016 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.241675040E09 +++$+++ {{ec}} Mattisse, I've seen the threads on [[WP:ANI]] and [[WP:RFAR]] about you, but I've never commented on them. I'm glad you're unblocked, and I deeply mourn your withdrawal from FAC, DYK, and GAN; you were one of the best reviewers I've ever seen, if not ''the'' best, and if I ever need help at GAN, I know [[User:Mattisse|who to contact]]. I've only had good interactions with you; I'll always remember [[Talk:Rocko's Modern Life\/GA1|the first]]. :) Please, ''please'' reconsider your withdrawal from the main content review processes &ndash; your work there is ''why'' I gave you [[#Happy Mattisse's Day!|this]]! :) Sincerely, <font face=\"comic sans ms\">'''[[User:Dylan620|<font color=\"blue\">Dylan<\/font>]][[User talk:Dylan620|<font color=\"purple\">620<\/font>]]''' <sub>[[Special:Contributions\/Dylan620|Efforts]] \xb7  +++$+++ ::::{{ec}} Mattisse, I've seen the threads on [[WP:ANI]] and [[WP:RFAR]] about you, but I've never commented on them. I'm glad you're unblocked, and I deeply mourn your withdrawal from FAC, DYK, and GAN; you were one of the best reviewers I've ever seen, if not ''the'' best, and if I ever need help at GAN, I know [[User:Mattisse|who to contact]]. I've only had good interactions with you; I'll always remember [[Talk:Rocko's Modern Life/GA1|the first]]. :) Please, ''please'' reconsider your withdrawal from the main content review processes &ndash; your work there is ''why'' I gave you [[#Happy Mattisse's Day!|this]]! :) Sincerely, <font face="comic sans ms">'''[[User:Dylan620|<font color="blue">Dylan</font>]][[User talk:Dylan620|<font color="purple">620</font>]]''' <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Dylan620|Efforts]] · [[User:Dylan620/Personal toolbox|Toolbox]]</sub></font> 22:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

307146 +++$+++ Lazyquasar +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 307146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-21 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.198239420E09 +++$+++ Crossmr, you have deleted some material, apparently mostly links, from within specific quotes that were precise quotations with attribution and online verifiable sources attached.  This quoted text was cut and pasted directly from online research papers published by scholars.  It was cleaned up by me so the formatting made the text readable as it was in the original source.  I suggest you repair this damage.  Quotes may not be modified to suit publishers whims, they are attributed to specific authors and must be accurate.   If you do not fix this damage within 48 hours I am going to take this matter up with an administrator as it directly bears on Wikipedia's reputation for accuracy and correctness.  I would fix it myself but I am getting a bit tired of being on the verge of an edit war with you and Unitedstatesian with no reasonable specific discussion of the deletion of my work.   +++$+++ Crossmr, you have deleted some material, apparently mostly links, from within specific quotes that were precise quotations with attribution and online verifiable sources attached.  This quoted text was cut and pasted directly from online research papers published by scholars.  It was cleaned up by me so the formatting made the text readable as it was in the original source.  I suggest you repair this damage.  Quotes may not be modified to suit publishers whims, they are attributed to specific authors and must be accurate.   If you do not fix this damage within 48 hours I am going to take this matter up with an administrator as it directly bears on Wikipedia's reputation for accuracy and correctness.  I would fix it myself but I am getting a bit tired of being on the verge of an edit war with you and Unitedstatesian with no reasonable specific discussion of the deletion of my work.  [[User:Lazyquasar|Lazyquasar]] ([[User talk:Lazyquasar|talk]]) 04:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
307147 +++$+++ Lazyquasar +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 307146 +++$+++ 307146 +++$+++ 2007-12-22 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.198320000E09 +++$+++ Crossmr, I am fairly familar with most Wikipedia policies and guidelines.  Recommending that I read a bunch of stuff against vague allegations is not useful.  I have not threatened you.   If you feel I have please quote the specific text you find threatening so we can resolve the confusion.   The promise to notify an adminstrator if you do not repair the quotation you damaged at article [[wikiversity]] stands.  Allow me to give you a few hints.  You can delete the quotes if you do not like them by moving the material to the discussion page and stating the reasons you find it inappropriate in the article.  This is fairly standard practice and part of a local dialogue to attempt to improve the article.  You can also delete the material and document the reasons although many editors find this pre-emptive behavior arrogant and irritating.  Many prefer you start a discussion first before deleting.  What you may not do is modify content of quoted text because it is attributed to an external author who is not locally present to defend his work.  This is a well known standard practice in academia and I have never heard any discussion at Wikipedia that these proven practices should be not be followed at Wikipedia.  In essence, you have modified a quote so that Wikipedia is now misquoting the orginal author.  I will check after the stated time limit and follow up with an administrator if you have not taken action to repair the damage.  That is a statement of fact or promise, not a threat.   +++$+++ :Crossmr, I am fairly familar with most Wikipedia policies and guidelines.  Recommending that I read a bunch of stuff against vague allegations is not useful.  I have not threatened you.   If you feel I have please quote the specific text you find threatening so we can resolve the confusion.   The promise to notify an adminstrator if you do not repair the quotation you damaged at article [[wikiversity]] stands.  Allow me to give you a few hints.  You can delete the quotes if you do not like them by moving the material to the discussion page and stating the reasons you find it inappropriate in the article.  This is fairly standard practice and part of a local dialogue to attempt to improve the article.  You can also delete the material and document the reasons although many editors find this pre-emptive behavior arrogant and irritating.  Many prefer you start a discussion first before deleting.  What you may not do is modify content of quoted text because it is attributed to an external author who is not locally present to defend his work.  This is a well known standard practice in academia and I have never heard any discussion at Wikipedia that these proven practices should be not be followed at Wikipedia.  In essence, you have modified a quote so that Wikipedia is now misquoting the orginal author.  I will check after the stated time limit and follow up with an administrator if you have not taken action to repair the damage.  That is a statement of fact or promise, not a threat.  [[User:Lazyquasar|Lazyquasar]] ([[User talk:Lazyquasar|talk]]) 02:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
307148 +++$+++ Lazyquasar +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 307146 +++$+++ 307147 +++$+++ 2007-12-23 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.198412160E09 +++$+++ The changes you made modify the quote because the information was there for the convenience of the reader.  You intentionally made things less convenient for the reader by deleting information the author wanted them to have.  I noticed you chose to delete the quotes rather than face the wrath of the adminstrators I \"threatened\" you with.  Perhaps you should discreetly ask an admin or two what they think about modifying quotes \"because Wikipedia is not a web directory\".  An early fundamental principle of Wikipedia was to improve others work not delete it.  Since you are not interested in improving the Wikiversity article perhaps you should edit at other articles you are more interested in or knowledgeable about ... or even read the Manual of Style regarding formatting quotes and reformat them yourself as references.  Have a Merry Christmas and an excellent New Year's celebration!  +++$+++ ::The changes you made modify the quote because the information was there for the convenience of the reader.  You intentionally made things less convenient for the reader by deleting information the author wanted them to have.  I noticed you chose to delete the quotes rather than face the wrath of the adminstrators I "threatened" you with.  Perhaps you should discreetly ask an admin or two what they think about modifying quotes "because Wikipedia is not a web directory".  An early fundamental principle of Wikipedia was to improve others work not delete it.  Since you are not interested in improving the Wikiversity article perhaps you should edit at other articles you are more interested in or knowledgeable about ... or even read the Manual of Style regarding formatting quotes and reformat them yourself as references.  Have a Merry Christmas and an excellent New Year's celebration! [[User:Lazyquasar|Lazyquasar]] ([[User talk:Lazyquasar|talk]]) 04:16, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

532158 +++$+++ Terra Green +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532158 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-07 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.136624460E09 +++$+++ You asked me to block a user but I'm not an admin. <font size=\"-2\"> +++$+++ You asked me to block a user but I'm not an admin. <font size="-2">[[User:Terra Green|Terra]]<font color="green">[[User talk:Terra Green|Green]]</font></font> 01:01, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
532159 +++$+++ Terra Green +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532158 +++$+++ 532158 +++$+++ 2006-01-07 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.136624700E09 +++$+++ Hi, no worries.  Have a nice day. Check out [[WP:AIV]]. <font size=\"-2\"> +++$+++ :Hi, no worries.  Have a nice day. Check out [[WP:AIV]]. <font size="-2">[[User:Terra Green|Terra]]<font color="green">[[User talk:Terra Green|Green]]</font></font> 01:05, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

219765 +++$+++ Rdm2376 +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219765 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-17 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.261042440E09 +++$+++ Can you show me the source that states that Ulya Margusheva at [[List of disputed supercentenarian claimants]] could not keep her story straight? Without a reliable source we cannot make that statement. Same goes for the other living list entries.  +++$+++ Can you show me the source that states that Ulya Margusheva at [[List of disputed supercentenarian claimants]] could not keep her story straight? Without a reliable source we cannot make that statement. Same goes for the other living list entries. [[User:Rdm2376|Kevin]] ([[User talk:Rdm2376|talk]]) 01:34, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
219766 +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219765 +++$+++ 219765 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.261043460E09 +++$+++ Its here pal http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=PhGJs6to2w4&feature=related    I added her to [[Longevity claims]] about a few weeks ago just for the heads up! -- +++$+++ :Its here pal http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhGJs6to2w4&feature=related    I added her to [[Longevity claims]] about a few weeks ago just for the heads up! --[[User:NickOrnstein|Nick Ornstein]] ([[User talk:NickOrnstein#top|talk]]) 01:51, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
219767 +++$+++ Rdm2376 +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219765 +++$+++ 219766 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.261047000E09 +++$+++ That video in no way supports that statement. That is your interpretation of what was presented, and as [[WP:OR|original research]] cannot appear in the article.  +++$+++ ::That video in no way supports that statement. That is your interpretation of what was presented, and as [[WP:OR|original research]] cannot appear in the article. [[User:Rdm2376|Kevin]] ([[User talk:Rdm2376|talk]]) 02:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
219768 +++$+++ Ryoung122 +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219765 +++$+++ 219767 +++$+++ 2009-12-19 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.261290060E09 +++$+++ Did you even watch the video? Toward the end it says she was born in 1891. It's not original research because, by definition, it was not done first on Wikipedia. +++$+++ :::Did you even watch the video? Toward the end it says she was born in 1891. It's not original research because, by definition, it was not done first on Wikipedia.[[User:Ryoung122|<span style="color:red">Ryoung</span><span style="color:blue">122</span>]] 22:21, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
219769 +++$+++ Rdm2376 +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219765 +++$+++ 219768 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.261374900E09 +++$+++ Yes I did. It makes certain claims about birth date discrepancies, but does not characterize Margusheva as being unable to keep her story straight. That is the part that needs to be removed.  +++$+++ ::::Yes I did. It makes certain claims about birth date discrepancies, but does not characterize Margusheva as being unable to keep her story straight. That is the part that needs to be removed. [[User:Rdm2376|Kevin]] ([[User talk:Rdm2376|talk]]) 21:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
219770 +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219765 +++$+++ 219767 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.261047420E09 +++$+++ Dont worry about the Youtube, its the source! Yes along the lines its original research. Ask Rob Young what he thinks about it. Im not too concerned but you are correct. -- +++$+++ :::Dont worry about the Youtube, its the source! Yes along the lines its original research. Ask Rob Young what he thinks about it. Im not too concerned but you are correct. --[[User:NickOrnstein|Nick Ornstein]] ([[User talk:NickOrnstein#top|talk]]) 02:57, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
219771 +++$+++ Rdm2376 +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219765 +++$+++ 219770 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.261048020E09 +++$+++ I am very concerned. You are making negative claims about [[WP:BLP|living people]] without providing an adequate source. Do you understand why we cannot allow these kinds of unsourced claims?  +++$+++ ::::I am very concerned. You are making negative claims about [[WP:BLP|living people]] without providing an adequate source. Do you understand why we cannot allow these kinds of unsourced claims? [[User:Rdm2376|Kevin]] ([[User talk:Rdm2376|talk]]) 03:07, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
219772 +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219765 +++$+++ 219771 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.261048140E09 +++$+++ JUST TAKE IT OFF THE LIST. i was the one who spent so much time making that whole article look nice and clean. Please just take it off before I get pissed. -- +++$+++ :::::JUST TAKE IT OFF THE LIST. i was the one who spent so much time making that whole article look nice and clean. Please just take it off before I get pissed. --[[User:NickOrnstein|Nick Ornstein]] ([[User talk:NickOrnstein#top|talk]]) 03:09, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

532161 +++$+++ Aphasia83 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-12 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.137055980E09 +++$+++ OK, I've tagged the rest of the [[Europe (band)|Europe]]-related pictures. Thanks for letting me know. \u2014  +++$+++ OK, I've tagged the rest of the [[Europe (band)|Europe]]-related pictures. Thanks for letting me know. — [[User:Aphasia83|Aphasia83]] 00:53, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
532162 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532161 +++$+++ 532161 +++$+++ 2006-01-12 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.137057060E09 +++$+++ Great!  +++$+++ *Great! [[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 01:11, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

270018 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.241675280E09 +++$+++ Matisse, I originally came here to ask you to make a statement at the request for arbitration. I'd still like to ask you to do that. I haven't decided whether to accept the case yet or not, and I would like to hear from you first before deciding. If you would prefer someone else to make a statement on your behalf, that might be an option, but ideally you would make a statement yourself. The other thing that needs to be resolved is the list you are making on your talk page. It is currently titled \"Torment\" and was titled \"Plague\". As Tznkai notes, it is not appropriate. Please remove that list and if you have any issues with other editors, please raise them in your statement, or at a case if it is accepted.  +++$+++ Matisse, I originally came here to ask you to make a statement at the request for arbitration. I'd still like to ask you to do that. I haven't decided whether to accept the case yet or not, and I would like to hear from you first before deciding. If you would prefer someone else to make a statement on your behalf, that might be an option, but ideally you would make a statement yourself. The other thing that needs to be resolved is the list you are making on your talk page. It is currently titled "Torment" and was titled "Plague". As Tznkai notes, it is not appropriate. Please remove that list and if you have any issues with other editors, please raise them in your statement, or at a case if it is accepted. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 22:48, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270019 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270018 +++$+++ 270018 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.241675640E09 +++$+++ I cannot defend myself. That is clear. Every time  I try I make it worse. My passion for editing and contributing is the same passion that gets me into trouble. It is clear that I am disliked.  It is better that I leave. I do not want to continue where I am not wanted.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I cannot defend myself. That is clear. Every time  I try I make it worse. My passion for editing and contributing is the same passion that gets me into trouble. It is clear that I am disliked.  It is better that I leave. I do not want to continue where I am not wanted.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270020 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270018 +++$+++ 270019 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.241676240E09 +++$+++ That isn't a decision that should be taken in the heat of the moment. If you are going to leave, please take the time to consider your options first, and talk with those you are on good terms with, and who may want you to stay. Please be aware that if you leave and then later return, that will in the long run reflect poorly on you. It is best to either make a clean break and leave permanently, or to take an extended break (weeks or months) to recharge the batteries, or to stay and participate in the case (if it is accepted). If you chose to take a break, be aware that the case may take place in your absence, or be resumed on your return (depending on what the Arbitration Committee as a whole decide).  +++$+++ ::That isn't a decision that should be taken in the heat of the moment. If you are going to leave, please take the time to consider your options first, and talk with those you are on good terms with, and who may want you to stay. Please be aware that if you leave and then later return, that will in the long run reflect poorly on you. It is best to either make a clean break and leave permanently, or to take an extended break (weeks or months) to recharge the batteries, or to stay and participate in the case (if it is accepted). If you chose to take a break, be aware that the case may take place in your absence, or be resumed on your return (depending on what the Arbitration Committee as a whole decide). [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 23:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270021 +++$+++ Synergy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270018 +++$+++ 270019 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.241676420E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, just take some time to think this over. You don't have to leave. Take the rest of the day (or night) to think on this. You're a valuable editor and leaving will solve nothing. If you're truly passionate about this project, you will strive to correct any perceived mistakes. You can be fixed. ''' +++$+++ ::Mattisse, just take some time to think this over. You don't have to leave. Take the rest of the day (or night) to think on this. You're a valuable editor and leaving will solve nothing. If you're truly passionate about this project, you will strive to correct any perceived mistakes. You can be fixed. '''[[User:Synergy|<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Syn</font>]]'''[[User_talk:Synergy|<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">ergy</font>]] 23:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270022 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270018 +++$+++ 270021 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.241676780E09 +++$+++ There is no one I have to talk to. I have sought out help many times.  I have done everything I know how to do. I know nothing else. It is very clear that I am not wanted here. Because I had sock puppets after me I have RFCs and such that are brought up every time I do something that someone dislikes. One of the links by a commentator at the Arbitration as his sole justification for being against me is from 2006, during the sock puppet problems. I cannot do anything with that sort of thing.  It is hopeless. I believe that.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::There is no one I have to talk to. I have sought out help many times.  I have done everything I know how to do. I know nothing else. It is very clear that I am not wanted here. Because I had sock puppets after me I have RFCs and such that are brought up every time I do something that someone dislikes. One of the links by a commentator at the Arbitration as his sole justification for being against me is from 2006, during the sock puppet problems. I cannot do anything with that sort of thing.  It is hopeless. I believe that.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270023 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270018 +++$+++ 270022 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.241677140E09 +++$+++ My talk page has been a refuge, even after disagreements between us. You are still very welcome there. '' +++$+++ ::::My talk page has been a refuge, even after disagreements between us. You are still very welcome there. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270024 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270018 +++$+++ 270023 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.241677260E09 +++$+++ I am blocked and cannot edit. I tried to post on your talk page. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I am blocked and cannot edit. I tried to post on your talk page. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270025 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270018 +++$+++ 270024 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.241677440E09 +++$+++ That is probably an autoblock. Someone should be able to fix it soon if enough people are watching this page.  +++$+++ ::::::That is probably an autoblock. Someone should be able to fix it soon if enough people are watching this page. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 23:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270026 +++$+++ Synergy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270018 +++$+++ 270022 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.241677560E09 +++$+++ And you are welcome on my talk as well. Tznkai has been notified about the autoblock and yeah someone should take care of it in a sec. ''' +++$+++ ::::And you are welcome on my talk as well. Tznkai has been notified about the autoblock and yeah someone should take care of it in a sec. '''[[User:Synergy|<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Syn</font>]]'''[[User_talk:Synergy|<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">ergy</font>]] 23:26, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

7875 +++$+++ Areeb786 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.310574780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Areeb786|Areeb786]] ([[User talk:Areeb786|talk]]) 09:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7876 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7875 +++$+++ 7875 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310579340E09 +++$+++ Nope, I don't unblock people who are socking, and if I hadn't seen [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations\/Areeb cool|this SPI report]] I would have simply blocked your new account too - but I'll leave it to its outcome now. If you want to be unblocked, you need to request it on your original account, [[User:Areeb cool]] - but this little escapade won't do your chances of success much good --  +++$+++ :Nope, I don't unblock people who are socking, and if I hadn't seen [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Areeb cool|this SPI report]] I would have simply blocked your new account too - but I'll leave it to its outcome now. If you want to be unblocked, you need to request it on your original account, [[User:Areeb cool]] - but this little escapade won't do your chances of success much good -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 10:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

7877 +++$+++ Qwyrxian +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310589720E09 +++$+++ Just in case you care, one of the caste SPAs (this one from [[Talk:Kurmi]]) has opened a discussion criticizing the behavior of you, SpacemanSpiff and myself (as \"admins\", even though I'm not one), as well as Sitush and MatthewVanitas.  It's at [[WP:NPOVN#One sided opinion of Admin and user Sitush and Matthews on the page Kurmi: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kurmi]] if you feel like commenting.   +++$+++ Just in case you care, one of the caste SPAs (this one from [[Talk:Kurmi]]) has opened a discussion criticizing the behavior of you, SpacemanSpiff and myself (as "admins", even though I'm not one), as well as Sitush and MatthewVanitas.  It's at [[WP:NPOVN#One sided opinion of Admin and user Sitush and Matthews on the page Kurmi: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurmi]] if you feel like commenting.  [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 13:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7878 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310591100E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Not sure what, if anything, I really need to say, but I might make a minor comment --  +++$+++ :Thanks. Not sure what, if anything, I really need to say, but I might make a minor comment -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 14:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7879 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ 7878 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310591280E09 +++$+++ Oh, and I'm sure that's a sock of a blocked user. There's one of them who calls MatthewVanitas \"Matthews\" - I'll need to do some digging to see who it is --  +++$+++ ::Oh, and I'm sure that's a sock of a blocked user. There's one of them who calls MatthewVanitas "Matthews" - I'll need to do some digging to see who it is -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7880 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ 7879 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.310592960E09 +++$+++ Prashantv79. -  +++$+++ :::Prashantv79. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 14:36, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7881 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ 7880 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.310595000E09 +++$+++ Yep --  +++$+++ ::::Yep -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 15:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7882 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ 7881 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310596020E09 +++$+++ Is an SPI on an IP worthwhile? They've avoided the auto-block and checkuser won't link IPs to usernames, IIRC. -  +++$+++ :::::Is an SPI on an IP worthwhile? They've avoided the auto-block and checkuser won't link IPs to usernames, IIRC. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 15:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7883 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ 7882 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.310596860E09 +++$+++ I was wondering the same, but I suspect probably not. And I can't help thinking it might be better to let his NPOVN report run to its conclusion anyway - it should at least demonstrate that he's not going to succeed that way. What's interesting is that IP 174.139.114.107 geolocates to California, and is allocated to \"VPLS Inc. d\/b\/a Krypt Technologies\" - an anonymising proxy service, perhaps? --  +++$+++ ::::::I was wondering the same, but I suspect probably not. And I can't help thinking it might be better to let his NPOVN report run to its conclusion anyway - it should at least demonstrate that he's not going to succeed that way. What's interesting is that IP 174.139.114.107 geolocates to California, and is allocated to "VPLS Inc. d/b/a Krypt Technologies" - an anonymising proxy service, perhaps? -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 15:41, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7884 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ 7883 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.310597820E09 +++$+++ I notice that Dougweller has commented there, although I have had no response from him regarding the issue that I raised. I might go out and lay a few more bricks - my argh! re: dealing with TT2011 needs to come down a notch. (And the wall needs building: I should take advantage of the lovely weather in Liverpool, problem being that the wall and myself are in Manchester!). -  +++$+++ :::::::I notice that Dougweller has commented there, although I have had no response from him regarding the issue that I raised. I might go out and lay a few more bricks - my argh! re: dealing with TT2011 needs to come down a notch. (And the wall needs building: I should take advantage of the lovely weather in Liverpool, problem being that the wall and myself are in Manchester!). - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 15:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7885 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ 7884 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310598300E09 +++$+++ It's quite a nice day here - come over any time :-) --  +++$+++ ::::::::It's quite a nice day here - come over any time :-) -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 16:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7886 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ 7885 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.310679060E09 +++$+++ Right now a beach on some Caribbean island would suit me fine, but I need to wait for the next payment to come through from Prince. Apparently I am now [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThisthat2011&action=historysubmit&diff=439439893&oldid=439429310 blackballing people]. This is from one of the group of people whom I have previously mentioned. -  +++$+++ :::::::::Right now a beach on some Caribbean island would suit me fine, but I need to wait for the next payment to come through from Prince. Apparently I am now [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThisthat2011&action=historysubmit&diff=439439893&oldid=439429310 blackballing people]. This is from one of the group of people whom I have previously mentioned. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 14:31, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
7887 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ 7886 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310687760E09 +++$+++ Blackballing, eh? Is there no end to your depravity? [[Image:Face-surprise.svg|20px]] --  +++$+++ ::::::::::Blackballing, eh? Is there no end to your depravity? [[Image:Face-surprise.svg|20px]] -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 16:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
7888 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7877 +++$+++ 7887 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310688960E09 +++$+++ Perhaps someone saw on my user page that I went to Cambridge Uni & so automatically assumed that means I am familiar with and a participant in the activities of the gentlemen's clubs of London. I don't play golf and I am not a member of the masons, either. BTW, I seem to have moved from Liverpool: one complainant today believed me to be an Indian writing from Japan. I ''do'' like to move around. -  +++$+++ :::::::::::Perhaps someone saw on my user page that I went to Cambridge Uni & so automatically assumed that means I am familiar with and a participant in the activities of the gentlemen's clubs of London. I don't play golf and I am not a member of the masons, either. BTW, I seem to have moved from Liverpool: one complainant today believed me to be an Indian writing from Japan. I ''do'' like to move around. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 17:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

532167 +++$+++ LuckyPanda +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-14 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.137233460E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about [[User:Eclectek|Eclectek's]] vandalism on my userpage. He's my friend and I was fully aware that he did that as a joke. I left the \"vandalism\" there because I thought it was funny. Just to let you know, he is fully aware of the ins and outs of wikipedia and did not just want to screw around.  +++$+++ Don't worry about [[User:Eclectek|Eclectek's]] vandalism on my userpage. He's my friend and I was fully aware that he did that as a joke. I left the "vandalism" there because I thought it was funny. Just to let you know, he is fully aware of the ins and outs of wikipedia and did not just want to screw around. [[User:LuckyPanda|LuckyPanda]] 02:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
532168 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532167 +++$+++ 532167 +++$+++ 2006-01-15 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.137372840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 16:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

532169 +++$+++ Eclectek +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-14 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.137235320E09 +++$+++ Cheers.  +++$+++ Cheers. [[User:Eclectek|Chad]] 02:42, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
532170 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532169 +++$+++ 532169 +++$+++ 2006-01-14 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.137302460E09 +++$+++ Chad, I would like to apologize for calling your edits vandalism as that is what they appeared to be.  I understand that it was all good fun.  I did not realize that you in fact go to Jesuit and are on the yearbook\/newspaper staff.  If I had looked at your user page and realized who you were (I know who you are) then I wouldn't have bothered leavng you the message and everything,and would have just let you guys sort it out yourselves.  Although it was just good fun, vandalizing each other's user pages probably isn't realy the best idea because it could be mistaken as real vandalism.  By the way, Chad, I do not think I am ready to be an admin. Again I apologize for my mistake, but vandalism is no laughing matter.  Looking at your contributions,I would just like to say that you have done a very fine job improving the Jesuit article and I hope you keep up the good work.  Have a nice day!  +++$+++ :Chad, I would like to apologize for calling your edits vandalism as that is what they appeared to be.  I understand that it was all good fun.  I did not realize that you in fact go to Jesuit and are on the yearbook/newspaper staff.  If I had looked at your user page and realized who you were (I know who you are) then I wouldn't have bothered leavng you the message and everything,and would have just let you guys sort it out yourselves.  Although it was just good fun, vandalizing each other's user pages probably isn't realy the best idea because it could be mistaken as real vandalism.  By the way, Chad, I do not think I am ready to be an admin. Again I apologize for my mistake, but vandalism is no laughing matter.  Looking at your contributions,I would just like to say that you have done a very fine job improving the Jesuit article and I hope you keep up the good work.  Have a nice day! [[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 21:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
532171 +++$+++ Eclectek +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532169 +++$+++ 532170 +++$+++ 2006-01-16 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.137405120E09 +++$+++ Consider this resolved.  Best of luck.   +++$+++ ::Consider this resolved.  Best of luck.  [[User:Eclectek|Chad]] 01:52, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
532172 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532169 +++$+++ 532171 +++$+++ 2006-01-16 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.137409740E09 +++$+++ I'm glad this is resolved. I wish you best of luck as well on both Wikipedia and for college admissions.  +++$+++ :::I'm glad this is resolved. I wish you best of luck as well on both Wikipedia and for college admissions. [[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 03:09, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

270027 +++$+++ Tznkai +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.241677620E09 +++$+++ Autoblocked cleared. Can anyone get the devs to show users an Autoblock message instead of a standard block message or something suitably brilliant?-- +++$+++ Autoblocked cleared. Can anyone get the devs to show users an Autoblock message instead of a standard block message or something suitably brilliant?--[[User:Tznkai|Tznkai]] ([[User talk:Tznkai|talk]]) 23:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270028 +++$+++ Thatcher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270027 +++$+++ 270027 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.241677800E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, if you believe, for example, that you have been unfairly hounded by people who are upset that you opposed their good and featured articles, and that admins have been ineffective in dealing with the situation, you should consider staying active and making that case for yourself.  The arbitrators really do bend over backwards to try and be fair to all parties to a case and to ferret out the underlying problems, as long as they have someone to point them in the right directions.  +++$+++ :Mattisse, if you believe, for example, that you have been unfairly hounded by people who are upset that you opposed their good and featured articles, and that admins have been ineffective in dealing with the situation, you should consider staying active and making that case for yourself.  The arbitrators really do bend over backwards to try and be fair to all parties to a case and to ferret out the underlying problems, as long as they have someone to point them in the right directions. [[User talk:Thatcher|Thatcher]] 23:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270029 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270027 +++$+++ 270028 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.241678340E09 +++$+++ If there are still any restrictions in place, they can be lifted if you can convince the community that when your personal viewpoints overlap with improving the encyclopedia you are ready to be fair or recuse if you're not sure you can be fair. (I won't reply further tonight, so take your time to think about the issues.) '' +++$+++ ::If there are still any restrictions in place, they can be lifted if you can convince the community that when your personal viewpoints overlap with improving the encyclopedia you are ready to be fair or recuse if you're not sure you can be fair. (I won't reply further tonight, so take your time to think about the issues.) ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:39, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

532173 +++$+++ Cohesion +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-16 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.137478020E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. [[User:Cohesion|cohesion]]<font color="#cc0033">&#9733;</font>[[User_talk:Cohesion|talk]] 22:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
532174 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532173 +++$+++ 532173 +++$+++ 2006-01-16 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.137479460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for alerting me about untagged '''[[:Image:LewisvilleLakeTollBridge.jpg]]'''.  I have since tagged it. Here I am tagging other people's pictures, and I forget to tag my own. Thanks again for alerting me about this and for notifying people about their images.  +++$+++ :Thanks for alerting me about untagged '''[[:Image:LewisvilleLakeTollBridge.jpg]]'''.  I have since tagged it. Here I am tagging other people's pictures, and I forget to tag my own. Thanks again for alerting me about this and for notifying people about their images. [[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 22:31, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
532175 +++$+++ Cohesion +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532173 +++$+++ 532174 +++$+++ 2006-01-16 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.137479640E09 +++$+++ No problem, I hadn't seen the template <nowiki>{{message|name}}<\/nowiki> and now I'm using it too :D I got a little bonus tagging ;)  -  +++$+++ ::No problem, I hadn't seen the template <nowiki>{{message|name}}</nowiki> and now I'm using it too :D I got a little bonus tagging ;)  - [[User:Cohesion|cohesion]]<font color="#cc0033">&#9733;</font>[[User_talk:Cohesion|talk]] 22:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

270030 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.241677980E09 +++$+++ As for some people apparently not liking you, Mattisse, sometimes you have to be able to think, ''Fuck them, it's their problem if they don't like me.'' Don't join hands with them; concentrate on the people who ''do'' value and appreciate you; I assure you there's plenty about. <font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ As for some people apparently not liking you, Mattisse, sometimes you have to be able to think, ''Fuck them, it's their problem if they don't like me.'' Don't join hands with them; concentrate on the people who ''do'' value and appreciate you; I assure you there's plenty about. <font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|Jayen]]</font>''<font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>'' 23:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270031 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.241678160E09 +++$+++ That's certainly my view. :-) -- +++$+++ :That's certainly my view. :-) --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:36, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270032 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.241678280E09 +++$+++ Matisse, I asked you above to remove the list of editors you were compiling on your talk page (in the section currently titled \"Torment\"). Can you please do that? As I said above, a list of grievances like that may be suitable for a case, but it is not suitable for your talk page. This was one of the reasons Tznkai blocked you. If you are going to discuss things on-wiki with other users, please remove that list first (saving it somewhere else if you must).  +++$+++ *Matisse, I asked you above to remove the list of editors you were compiling on your talk page (in the section currently titled "Torment"). Can you please do that? As I said above, a list of grievances like that may be suitable for a case, but it is not suitable for your talk page. This was one of the reasons Tznkai blocked you. If you are going to discuss things on-wiki with other users, please remove that list first (saving it somewhere else if you must). [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 23:38, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
270033 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270032 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.241680620E09 +++$+++ As there was no further response, I've [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=288377287&oldid=288371877 blanked the section in question]. All the text is still in the page history. If you wish to raise such concerns, please do so in the appropriate venue, either at the requests for arbitration thread, or with the editors concerned, or at another venue (such as request for comments), or a subpage in your userspace.  +++$+++ **As there was no further response, I've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=288377287&oldid=288371877 blanked the section in question]. All the text is still in the page history. If you wish to raise such concerns, please do so in the appropriate venue, either at the requests for arbitration thread, or with the editors concerned, or at another venue (such as request for comments), or a subpage in your userspace. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 00:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270034 +++$+++ Spidern +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.241684340E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, as a relatively new editor who hasn't directly interacted with you, I still '''urge''' you to at least tell your side of the story. I too share a passion for copyediting and have high hopes for this project, despite the fact that <s>bad apples can get in the way sometimes<\/s> conflicts with other editors can be stressful. Editors like you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=283325780&oldid=283306895 make this place go 'round], and it would sad to see a contributor of so many '''years''' and over 67k+ edits to suddenly stop. The point is that your contributions to this project are noted and appreciated, and it would be true shame if you allowed the heat of the moment to pressure you into invoking your [[WP:RTV|right to vanish]]. The Arbitration Committe will listen to all sides of the issue, and every effort will be made to look at things impartially. Don't give up now. [[User_talk:Spidern|<font color=\"darkred\">\u2190<\/font>]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ *Mattisse, as a relatively new editor who hasn't directly interacted with you, I still '''urge''' you to at least tell your side of the story. I too share a passion for copyediting and have high hopes for this project, despite the fact that <s>bad apples can get in the way sometimes</s> conflicts with other editors can be stressful. Editors like you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=283325780&oldid=283306895 make this place go 'round], and it would sad to see a contributor of so many '''years''' and over 67k+ edits to suddenly stop. The point is that your contributions to this project are noted and appreciated, and it would be true shame if you allowed the heat of the moment to pressure you into invoking your [[WP:RTV|right to vanish]]. The Arbitration Committe will listen to all sides of the issue, and every effort will be made to look at things impartially. Don't give up now. [[User_talk:Spidern|<font color="darkred">←</font>]]<font color="green">[[User:Spidern|Spidern]]</font>[[Special:Contributions/Spidern|<font color="darkblue">→</font>]] 01:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270035 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270034 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.241684760E09 +++$+++ I suggest that you think very carefully in future about comments like \"bad apples\" Spidern. Take a look at the contributions of those who are listed on Mattisse's talk page in her [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=288377287&oldid=288371877 \"Plague\/Torment\" section]. Are they all just worthless trouble-makers? -- +++$+++ :*I suggest that you think very carefully in future about comments like "bad apples" Spidern. Take a look at the contributions of those who are listed on Mattisse's talk page in her [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=288377287&oldid=288371877 "Plague/Torment" section]. Are they all just worthless trouble-makers? --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 01:26, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270036 +++$+++ Spidern +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270035 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.241687640E09 +++$+++ Don't read too deeply into what I said. I in no way support her Plague\/Torment section, and I support it's removal; I was simply offering the reassurance that I've dealt with difficult editors in the past. That being said, its generally not a good idea to apply generalized labels to people, and I can see how you might get the interpretation that you did out of it--I have refactored my comment. [[User_talk:Spidern|<font color=\"darkred\">\u2190<\/font>]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :**Don't read too deeply into what I said. I in no way support her Plague/Torment section, and I support it's removal; I was simply offering the reassurance that I've dealt with difficult editors in the past. That being said, its generally not a good idea to apply generalized labels to people, and I can see how you might get the interpretation that you did out of it--I have refactored my comment. [[User_talk:Spidern|<font color="darkred">←</font>]]<font color="green">[[User:Spidern|Spidern]]</font>[[Special:Contributions/Spidern|<font color="darkblue">→</font>]] 02:14, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270037 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270036 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.241688000E09 +++$+++ Thanks. You'll understand of course that not being a mind reader I can only react to what you said, not to what you meant to say. It's so difficult to communicate in words when we don't know each other or can't see each other. -- +++$+++ :::*Thanks. You'll understand of course that not being a mind reader I can only react to what you said, not to what you meant to say. It's so difficult to communicate in words when we don't know each other or can't see each other. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 02:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270038 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270035 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.241688000E09 +++$+++ Please be very careful here. This is a dangerous page. I personally am afraid to remove the link [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] put there to harm me by linking to the section [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] removed for my own protection. I feel it is too dangerous for editors to comment here. Please, anyone commenting here be aware this page is watched.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Please be very careful here. This is a dangerous page. I personally am afraid to remove the link [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] put there to harm me by linking to the section [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] removed for my own protection. I feel it is too dangerous for editors to comment here. Please, anyone commenting here be aware this page is watched.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270039 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270038 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.241688240E09 +++$+++ I would strongly suggest that you reconsider your allegation that I put a link on your talk page \"to harm you\". I put it there for clarification. If you found the link \"harmful\" than I would suggest to you that it would have been better had you not compiled that list in the first place, or removed the content yourself when you were asked to. -- +++$+++ ::::I would strongly suggest that you reconsider your allegation that I put a link on your talk page "to harm you". I put it there for clarification. If you found the link "harmful" than I would suggest to you that it would have been better had you not compiled that list in the first place, or removed the content yourself when you were asked to. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 02:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270040 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270039 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.241688840E09 +++$+++ Why else would you put it there when [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] removed it for my own protection? (see above). You know you are not welcome on this page and have been asked not to post here because of your negative impact on me.  What could be the explanation that you would put that link there, the very link to material that everyone in the Arbitration is using  against me? I cannot imagine why you would go against an arbitrator's judgment meant to be helpful to me. Your advice is not advice I trust, as I do not think you are acting in my interest. Perhaps, Malleus, you are willing to remove the link, now that you are aware of its damaging impact and the fact that an arbitrator removed it for my protection. If you remove it, I will remove my comment about its harmfulness, according to [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]]. You are defeating [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]]'s intent.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Why else would you put it there when [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] removed it for my own protection? (see above). You know you are not welcome on this page and have been asked not to post here because of your negative impact on me.  What could be the explanation that you would put that link there, the very link to material that everyone in the Arbitration is using  against me? I cannot imagine why you would go against an arbitrator's judgment meant to be helpful to me. Your advice is not advice I trust, as I do not think you are acting in my interest. Perhaps, Malleus, you are willing to remove the link, now that you are aware of its damaging impact and the fact that an arbitrator removed it for my protection. If you remove it, I will remove my comment about its harmfulness, according to [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]]. You are defeating [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]]'s intent.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:34, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270041 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270040 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.241689680E09 +++$+++ You have an unfortunate habit of distorting the facts to suit your case. Carcharoth did not remove the link, (s)he removed the content on your talk page, and left a link to it. In fact I simply copied Carcharoth's link. I will say no more here now, as anything else I might add would certainly not be complimentary. -- +++$+++ ::::::You have an unfortunate habit of distorting the facts to suit your case. Carcharoth did not remove the link, (s)he removed the content on your talk page, and left a link to it. In fact I simply copied Carcharoth's link. I will say no more here now, as anything else I might add would certainly not be complimentary. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 02:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270042 +++$+++ Spidern +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270038 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.241689080E09 +++$+++ Obviously there is much stress involved in suddenly receiving so much attention; some people in the community are rightfully concerned about recent interactions with you. But I can assure you that there's nobody out to get you here, and I think that many of us are just trying to see things from your perspective. If you think that the accusations are unfounded, prove them all wrong by extending a willingness to cooperate. That way it will all pan out for the best, guaranteed. [[User_talk:Spidern|<font color=\"darkred\">\u2190<\/font>]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ ::::Obviously there is much stress involved in suddenly receiving so much attention; some people in the community are rightfully concerned about recent interactions with you. But I can assure you that there's nobody out to get you here, and I think that many of us are just trying to see things from your perspective. If you think that the accusations are unfounded, prove them all wrong by extending a willingness to cooperate. That way it will all pan out for the best, guaranteed. [[User_talk:Spidern|<font color="darkred">←</font>]]<font color="green">[[User:Spidern|Spidern]]</font>[[Special:Contributions/Spidern|<font color="darkblue">→</font>]] 02:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270043 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270042 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.241689440E09 +++$+++ There is tremendous stress for me. This is how some editors use that to get more \"evidence\" to use against me in something like an arbitration. They know how to take advantage of an emotional moment for me. That is why I caution others, that this page is dangerous as it is watched. For me, it is already too late and I am doomed. But you see how clever editors can entrap. Beware for yourself; learn from my experience. This is not a benign place populated by kind people. You can never be too careful. As I said, it is already too late for me.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::There is tremendous stress for me. This is how some editors use that to get more "evidence" to use against me in something like an arbitration. They know how to take advantage of an emotional moment for me. That is why I caution others, that this page is dangerous as it is watched. For me, it is already too late and I am doomed. But you see how clever editors can entrap. Beware for yourself; learn from my experience. This is not a benign place populated by kind people. You can never be too careful. As I said, it is already too late for me.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:44, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270044 +++$+++ Spidern +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270043 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.241690160E09 +++$+++ I think that one of my greatest gifts as a writer is being able to jump into other peoples' perspectives. Consider some of the things you've said that might have offended people, and read them as if from the outside, asking yourself what you were to think if you were a person at the other end. Play the devil's advocate; try to see things from other editors' standpoints. I don't think for a second that you're doomed, and maintain that a simple gesture showing that you are willing to think introspectively would do wonders for you here. [[User_talk:Spidern|<font color=\"darkred\">\u2190<\/font>]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ ::::::I think that one of my greatest gifts as a writer is being able to jump into other peoples' perspectives. Consider some of the things you've said that might have offended people, and read them as if from the outside, asking yourself what you were to think if you were a person at the other end. Play the devil's advocate; try to see things from other editors' standpoints. I don't think for a second that you're doomed, and maintain that a simple gesture showing that you are willing to think introspectively would do wonders for you here. [[User_talk:Spidern|<font color="darkred">←</font>]]<font color="green">[[User:Spidern|Spidern]]</font>[[Special:Contributions/Spidern|<font color="darkblue">→</font>]] 02:56, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270045 +++$+++ Spidern +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270043 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.241690880E09 +++$+++ I would also like to add that if \"evidence\" against you is ever posted, its effect would be gradually become completely moot by a deliberate and continued willingness to cooperate with others. The community will ''always'' give you a chance so long as you are able to display a desire to work with people in good faith. [[User_talk:Spidern|<font color=\"darkred\">\u2190<\/font>]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ ::::::I would also like to add that if "evidence" against you is ever posted, its effect would be gradually become completely moot by a deliberate and continued willingness to cooperate with others. The community will ''always'' give you a chance so long as you are able to display a desire to work with people in good faith. [[User_talk:Spidern|<font color="darkred">←</font>]]<font color="green">[[User:Spidern|Spidern]]</font>[[Special:Contributions/Spidern|<font color="darkblue">→</font>]] 03:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270046 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270030 +++$+++ 270045 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.241691840E09 +++$+++ The evidence was posted against me. Few bothered to read it. Those that did weighed in on my side. The rest voted on the basis of supporting the word of  favored editors. Your seem to be advocating hypocracy, which does work. However, I am not one who can engage in it. If one dares to express an unpopular view, then the same evidence, even if it is old hat, is dragged up and used to discredit current views. I believe there is not an instance where my view has been wrong, only unpopular, so a favored editor drags up the past to discredit me. That is why, unless the past is examined, I cannot operate on Wikipedia any longer.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::The evidence was posted against me. Few bothered to read it. Those that did weighed in on my side. The rest voted on the basis of supporting the word of  favored editors. Your seem to be advocating hypocracy, which does work. However, I am not one who can engage in it. If one dares to express an unpopular view, then the same evidence, even if it is old hat, is dragged up and used to discredit current views. I believe there is not an instance where my view has been wrong, only unpopular, so a favored editor drags up the past to discredit me. That is why, unless the past is examined, I cannot operate on Wikipedia any longer.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

532176 +++$+++ Eclectek +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532176 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-18 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.137585720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Eclectek|Chad]] 04:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
532177 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532176 +++$+++ 532176 +++$+++ 2006-01-18 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.137620940E09 +++$+++ I would like it blocked myself; however, when the Jesuit IP is blocked we can't edit either even when we are logged on if we are using the Jesuit connection.  +++$+++ :I would like it blocked myself; however, when the Jesuit IP is blocked we can't edit either even when we are logged on if we are using the Jesuit connection. [[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 13:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
532178 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532176 +++$+++ 532176 +++$+++ 2006-01-19 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.137671460E09 +++$+++ Sorry about sending your IP the unnecessary welcome, but hey it doesn't hurt to get welcomed again. Have a good one!  +++$+++ :Sorry about sending your IP the unnecessary welcome, but hey it doesn't hurt to get welcomed again. Have a good one! [[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 03:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

7889 +++$+++ MatthewVanitas +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.310688900E09 +++$+++ I have it on good authority that Sitush has [[Toilet papering|TP'ed]] the houses of editors with whom he disagrees, written them fake \"secret admirer\" letters to convince them to show up for a rendezvous only to be humiliated on hidden camera as they stand there alone in the bar lobby holding a red rose, and on at least two occasions stolen their hubcaps.  +++$+++ I have it on good authority that Sitush has [[Toilet papering|TP'ed]] the houses of editors with whom he disagrees, written them fake "secret admirer" letters to convince them to show up for a rendezvous only to be humiliated on hidden camera as they stand there alone in the bar lobby holding a red rose, and on at least two occasions stolen their hubcaps. [[User:MatthewVanitas|MatthewVanitas]] ([[User talk:MatthewVanitas|talk]]) 17:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
7890 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7889 +++$+++ 7889 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310689620E09 +++$+++ Stealing hubcaps? Hmm, maybe he really is from Liverpool --  +++$+++ :Stealing hubcaps? Hmm, maybe he really is from Liverpool -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 17:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
7891 +++$+++ Qwyrxian +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7889 +++$+++ 7890 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310722920E09 +++$+++ (referring to Sitush's comment above) Moved to Japan?  Then you should stop by my place.  It might be easier to conduct the Cabal activities (btw, do we have a name for our Cabal?  I mean, I know we have a ''real name'', but we can't tell people that; I mean, a name suitable for the public) in person rather than by our usual combination of carrier pigeon and cryptic classified ads.  In any event, the weather's pretty good here, holding steady around 33, and fireworks season is almost upon us.  +++$+++ ::(referring to Sitush's comment above) Moved to Japan?  Then you should stop by my place.  It might be easier to conduct the Cabal activities (btw, do we have a name for our Cabal?  I mean, I know we have a ''real name'', but we can't tell people that; I mean, a name suitable for the public) in person rather than by our usual combination of carrier pigeon and cryptic classified ads.  In any event, the weather's pretty good here, holding steady around 33, and fireworks season is almost upon us. [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 02:42, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

263459 +++$+++ GWP +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-10 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.147322340E09 +++$+++ Thankyou for your help, I shall remove such images as do not pertain to articles. +++$+++ Thankyou for your help, I shall remove such images as do not pertain to articles.[[User:GWP|GWP]] 21:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
263460 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263459 +++$+++ 263459 +++$+++ 2006-05-10 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.147322640E09 +++$+++ Hi. yeah, that's probably best. Tag them <nowiki>{{db-author}}<\/nowiki>.  +++$+++ :Hi. yeah, that's probably best. Tag them <nowiki>{{db-author}}</nowiki>. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

7892 +++$+++ Zigzig20s +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.310606460E09 +++$+++ If you had bothered to look at my article, sources I cited, mostly books, used the title with Daily in it. Thus, that seemed to be the right title. Now, you seem to have deleted my article with references...Why would you do that? I would've understood if you'd made the mistake of changing the title but keeping the sources. +++$+++ If you had bothered to look at my article, sources I cited, mostly books, used the title with Daily in it. Thus, that seemed to be the right title. Now, you seem to have deleted my article with references...Why would you do that? I would've understood if you'd made the mistake of changing the title but keeping the sources.[[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 18:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7893 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310606640E09 +++$+++ Hi. If you would like to politely ask me to expand on why you were wrong in what you did, I'll be happy to explain. But if you only want to bluster with your \"If you had bothered to look\" nonsense, you can go find someone else to help --  +++$+++ :Hi. If you would like to politely ask me to expand on why you were wrong in what you did, I'll be happy to explain. But if you only want to bluster with your "If you had bothered to look" nonsense, you can go find someone else to help -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 18:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7894 +++$+++ Zigzig20s +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ 7893 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310606820E09 +++$+++ Why do you remove info with sources? I guess I could've moved the original page with the right title, and edited it with sources, etc. But I saw it after I'd created the right page. Still, I'm sure you'll agree that now the page you left is devoid of sources, with the wrong title, and thus pretty useless. +++$+++ ::Why do you remove info with sources? I guess I could've moved the original page with the right title, and edited it with sources, etc. But I saw it after I'd created the right page. Still, I'm sure you'll agree that now the page you left is devoid of sources, with the wrong title, and thus pretty useless.[[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 18:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7895 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ 7894 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.310607120E09 +++$+++ Oh yes, I can now see what you were trying to do, but you simply went about it the wrong way - and there are very good reasons not to do it the way you did. Now, if you want me to explain further and help you to do it the right way, stop arguing and ask me politely to help you - though I have important things to go and do now, so you'll have to wait until I get back --  +++$+++ :::Oh yes, I can now see what you were trying to do, but you simply went about it the wrong way - and there are very good reasons not to do it the way you did. Now, if you want me to explain further and help you to do it the right way, stop arguing and ask me politely to help you - though I have important things to go and do now, so you'll have to wait until I get back -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 18:32, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7896 +++$+++ Zigzig20s +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ 7895 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.310607540E09 +++$+++ This isn't a [[Sadomasochism]] playroom. Pls get back my page with sources and the right title lol. +++$+++ ::::This isn't a [[Sadomasochism]] playroom. Pls get back my page with sources and the right title lol.[[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 18:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7897 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ 7896 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.310609820E09 +++$+++ OK, please yourself - but should you decide to stop demanding the wrong thing and politely ask for help, you will be welcome here on my Talk page --  +++$+++ :::::OK, please yourself - but should you decide to stop demanding the wrong thing and politely ask for help, you will be welcome here on my Talk page -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 19:17, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7898 +++$+++ Zigzig20s +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ 7897 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.310611920E09 +++$+++ I'm not the one who deleted a page with the right title and sources. Jesus. Why can't you just do it? I don't have time to argue about this. Just fix it. Do the job. Thanks! +++$+++ ::::::I'm not the one who deleted a page with the right title and sources. Jesus. Why can't you just do it? I don't have time to argue about this. Just fix it. Do the job. Thanks![[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 19:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7899 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ 7898 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.310612760E09 +++$+++ Because if you want to change the name of an article or change its sources, creating a new one and deleting the old one is THE WRONG WAY TO DO IT! I left you a perfectly friendly message on your Talk page, telling you quite civilly that if you explained what you wanted to do I'd be happy to help. But you responded arrogantly and sarcastically, and have continued in the same vein, and now you have blown your chance of getting any help from me. So go ask someone else for help, or work it out for yourself - just don't bother me here any further --  +++$+++ :::::::Because if you want to change the name of an article or change its sources, creating a new one and deleting the old one is THE WRONG WAY TO DO IT! I left you a perfectly friendly message on your Talk page, telling you quite civilly that if you explained what you wanted to do I'd be happy to help. But you responded arrogantly and sarcastically, and have continued in the same vein, and now you have blown your chance of getting any help from me. So go ask someone else for help, or work it out for yourself - just don't bother me here any further -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 20:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
7900 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.310668080E09 +++$+++ Sorry I over-reacted a bit yesterday - I've left you some more helpful suggestions over on your Talk page --  +++$+++ *Sorry I over-reacted a bit yesterday - I've left you some more helpful suggestions over on your Talk page -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 11:28, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
7901 +++$+++ Zigzig20s +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ 7900 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.310673780E09 +++$+++ Done, thanks. All the books I cite have 'daily' in the title though. But I'm not from Yuma, I'm not sure. +++$+++ ::Done, thanks. All the books I cite have 'daily' in the title though. But I'm not from Yuma, I'm not sure.[[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 13:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
7902 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7892 +++$+++ 7901 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.310687520E09 +++$+++ I've deleted your userfied copy now. I see what you mean about the title - doing a bit of searching finds quite a lot of sources calling it the \"Yuma Daily Sun\". I wonder if adjusting the opening sentence to say \"The '''Yuma Sun''', often referred to as the '''Yuma Daily Sun''',...\" might be a good way to go? --  +++$+++ :::I've deleted your userfied copy now. I see what you mean about the title - doing a bit of searching finds quite a lot of sources calling it the "Yuma Daily Sun". I wonder if adjusting the opening sentence to say "The '''Yuma Sun''', often referred to as the '''Yuma Daily Sun''',..." might be a good way to go? -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 16:52, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

569294 +++$+++ Akihabara +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-04 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.165303500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for removing.  Next time please check history before accusing.  +++$+++ Thanks for removing.  Next time please check history before accusing. [[User:Akihabara|Akihabara]] 23:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
569295 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569294 +++$+++ 569294 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.165303800E09 +++$+++ There was no accusation! I asked a question based upon the edit summary which seemed unusual, creating a page pre-set up for deletion.  +++$+++ :There was no accusation! I asked a question based upon the edit summary which seemed unusual, creating a page pre-set up for deletion. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
569296 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569294 +++$+++ 569294 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.165306020E09 +++$+++ Firstly, please sign your Talk page comments with four tildes, <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>, as it makes it easier for editors to respond.  Secondly, the [[:WP:BIO]] guidelines are clear when it comes to notability, so speedy deletion is an option.  Thirdly, your repeated recreation of the article is vandalism and you have been warned about this on numerous occasions. Fourthly, your last comment can be considered a threat to keep on vandalising in spite of being asked not to, so this response constitutes a final warning for you. You will be blocked again if you vandalise Wikipedia in the future.  +++$+++ :Firstly, please sign your Talk page comments with four tildes, <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, as it makes it easier for editors to respond.  Secondly, the [[:WP:BIO]] guidelines are clear when it comes to notability, so speedy deletion is an option.  Thirdly, your repeated recreation of the article is vandalism and you have been warned about this on numerous occasions. Fourthly, your last comment can be considered a threat to keep on vandalising in spite of being asked not to, so this response constitutes a final warning for you. You will be blocked again if you vandalise Wikipedia in the future. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 00:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

532182 +++$+++ evrik +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532182 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-24 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.138164180E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Evrik|evrik]] 20:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
532183 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532182 +++$+++ 532182 +++$+++ 2006-01-28 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.138498200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know about the Scouting Barnstar.  +++$+++ *Thanks for letting me know about the Scouting Barnstar. [[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 17:30, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
532184 +++$+++ evrik +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532182 +++$+++ 532183 +++$+++ 2006-02-02 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.138932900E09 +++$+++ Could you go back and [[Wikipedia:Barnstar_and_award_proposals#How_to_decide|vote]] one more time. We're trying to build a consensus on a star. Thanks!  +++$+++ **Could you go back and [[Wikipedia:Barnstar_and_award_proposals#How_to_decide|vote]] one more time. We're trying to build a consensus on a star. Thanks! [[User:Evrik|evrik]] 18:15, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

480360 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-03 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.265211540E09 +++$+++ Quick question: a number of articles that are listed as uncategorized by your toolserver for uncategorized pages are actually in the hidden category {{cl|Redirects to Wiktionary}}. Is there a way to exclude those? The category isn't directly applied to articles, but is transcluded by the {{tl|wi}} template \u2014 perhaps add that template as something that the toolserver should skip?  +++$+++ Quick question: a number of articles that are listed as uncategorized by your toolserver for uncategorized pages are actually in the hidden category {{cl|Redirects to Wiktionary}}. Is there a way to exclude those? The category isn't directly applied to articles, but is transcluded by the {{tl|wi}} template — perhaps add that template as something that the toolserver should skip? [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 07:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
480361 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480360 +++$+++ 480360 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.265217780E09 +++$+++ That should be doable.  I'll try to get it in within the next week. -- +++$+++ :That should be doable.  I'll try to get it in within the next week. --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 09:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
480362 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480360 +++$+++ 480361 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.266690240E09 +++$+++ Done. Sorry for the delay. -- +++$+++ ::Done. Sorry for the delay. --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 10:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
480363 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480360 +++$+++ 480362 +++$+++ 2010-02-21 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.266754560E09 +++$+++ No worries. Looks like it worked; I didn't comprehensively go through the entire list or anything, but one of the first bunches of items on the list used to be a set of Wiktionary redirects from word suffixes (-est, -ing, that kind of thing) and they're all gone. Thanks!  +++$+++ :::No worries. Looks like it worked; I didn't comprehensively go through the entire list or anything, but one of the first bunches of items on the list used to be a set of Wiktionary redirects from word suffixes (-est, -ing, that kind of thing) and they're all gone. Thanks! [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 04:16, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

532186 +++$+++ violetriga +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-28 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.138521300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for welcoming new users, but I think that a user called \"[[User:Violetriga, you are NOT helping Wikipedia!|Violetriga, you are NOT helping Wikipedia!]]\" doesn't really deserve a welcome.   +++$+++ Thanks for welcoming new users, but I think that a user called "[[User:Violetriga, you are NOT helping Wikipedia!|Violetriga, you are NOT helping Wikipedia!]]" doesn't really deserve a welcome.  [[user:violetriga|violet/riga]] [[User_talk:violetriga|(t)]] 23:55, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
532187 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532186 +++$+++ 532186 +++$+++ 2006-01-29 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.138598280E09 +++$+++ You are probably right about this user not deserving a welcome as the name is offensive and probably inappropriate. I try to make welcomes more personal to the user, but sometimes I have gotten into the habit of just going to Recent changes and pasting a welcome on all the red linked user talk pages.  In the future if I see an offensive name such as this I will check to see if it is acceptable by Wikipedia's rules before welcoming them. I apologize for this matter and I hope you have a nice day! -- +++$+++ :You are probably right about this user not deserving a welcome as the name is offensive and probably inappropriate. I try to make welcomes more personal to the user, but sometimes I have gotten into the habit of just going to Recent changes and pasting a welcome on all the red linked user talk pages.  In the future if I see an offensive name such as this I will check to see if it is acceptable by Wikipedia's rules before welcoming them. I apologize for this matter and I hope you have a nice day! --[[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 21:18, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
532188 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532186 +++$+++ 532187 +++$+++ 2006-02-15 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.139993160E09 +++$+++ I forgot to say that I changed the \"Welcome!\" message to one informing of the block.  +++$+++ ::I forgot to say that I changed the "Welcome!" message to one informing of the block. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 00:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

7903 +++$+++ Jsfouche +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.310786340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for clarifying about the Talk Page CSD.  I was unsure how to handle that.  I was not clear if it was appropriate to remove other editor's comments.  <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ Thanks for clarifying about the Talk Page CSD.  I was unsure how to handle that.  I was not clear if it was appropriate to remove other editor's comments.  <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Jsfouche|<span style="background:#191970;color:#FF8C00;padding:0 4px">jsfouche &#9789;&#9790;</span>]][[User talk:Jsfouche|<font color="navy"></font>Talk]]</font> 20:19, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
7904 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7903 +++$+++ 7903 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310786820E09 +++$+++ NP. You were right that something needed to be done, and it did look like it was moved over from when the user was developing the article on their own page. But then some article Talk had been added to it. So I thought it best to remove the earlier user talk and leave the article talk --  +++$+++ :NP. You were right that something needed to be done, and it did look like it was moved over from when the user was developing the article on their own page. But then some article Talk had been added to it. So I thought it best to remove the earlier user talk and leave the article talk -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 20:27, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

270048 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-07 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.241759700E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Thanks a lot for your meticulous attention to [[Loihi]]. If I could copyedit like that...*jelousy* <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks a lot for your meticulous attention to [[Loihi]]. If I could copyedit like that...*jelousy* <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="black">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="black">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 22:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270049 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270048 +++$+++ 270048 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.241759880E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much!  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ *Thank you so much!  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

7905 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7905 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.310788860E09 +++$+++ Whatever you did on Commons, I see it worked. If you want to repeat the trick, there is another one [[Commons:File:Heather Vesey after Break Into Music.jpg|here]]. I meant to point that out in our original discussion, but carelessly linked the first one twice instead. Regards,  +++$+++ Whatever you did on Commons, I see it worked. If you want to repeat the trick, there is another one [[Commons:File:Heather Vesey after Break Into Music.jpg|here]]. I meant to point that out in our original discussion, but carelessly linked the first one twice instead. Regards, [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 21:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
7906 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7905 +++$+++ 7905 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.310788980E09 +++$+++ Aha, I'll try and remember what I did and do it again :-) --  +++$+++ :Aha, I'll try and remember what I did and do it again :-) -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 21:03, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

270050 +++$+++ CarpetCrawler +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-07 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.241763420E09 +++$+++ <\/div><!-- Template:smile --> :)  +++$+++ </div><!-- Template:smile --> :) [[User:CarpetCrawler|<span style="color:#660066">'''''Carpet'''''</span><span style="color:#000033">'''''Crawler'''''</span>]][[User_talk:CarpetCrawler|<span style="color:#990033"><sup>'''''message me'''''</sup></span>]] 23:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
270051 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270050 +++$+++ 270050 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.241763960E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I will try to think of someone. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ *Thank you! I will try to think of someone. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:26, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

7907 +++$+++ MatthewVanitas +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7907 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310789100E09 +++$+++ It's somewhat vexing to realise that, just on [[Talk:Kurmi]] we have 44 sections almost entirely dealing with the inclusion of the word Shudra, and it would be far worse were it not for the frequent barring of IPs from the articlespace and even the Talk. It's really not something we can back down on, because there are dozens and dozens more articles which contain inflated Kshatriya claims for labouring castes (note how the old version of [[Varna (Hinduism]] had essentially no modern castes of any significance listed as Shudra, but had quite a few listed as Kshatriya despite deep doubts). In the big picture, it'd be great to figure out some sort of way we could tackle the issue in a manner other than laborious house-to-house fighting.  +++$+++ It's somewhat vexing to realise that, just on [[Talk:Kurmi]] we have 44 sections almost entirely dealing with the inclusion of the word Shudra, and it would be far worse were it not for the frequent barring of IPs from the articlespace and even the Talk. It's really not something we can back down on, because there are dozens and dozens more articles which contain inflated Kshatriya claims for labouring castes (note how the old version of [[Varna (Hinduism]] had essentially no modern castes of any significance listed as Shudra, but had quite a few listed as Kshatriya despite deep doubts). In the big picture, it'd be great to figure out some sort of way we could tackle the issue in a manner other than laborious house-to-house fighting. [[User:MatthewVanitas|MatthewVanitas]] ([[User talk:MatthewVanitas|talk]]) 21:05, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
7908 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7907 +++$+++ 7907 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310800560E09 +++$+++ [[Talk:2011_land_acquisition_protests_in_Uttar_Pradesh]] - unbelievable. -  +++$+++ :[[Talk:2011_land_acquisition_protests_in_Uttar_Pradesh]] - unbelievable. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 00:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
7909 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7907 +++$+++ 7908 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.310838060E09 +++$+++ Sigh, yes, I think we do need to do something about it - just not sure what --  +++$+++ ::Sigh, yes, I think we do need to do something about it - just not sure what -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 10:41, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
7910 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7907 +++$+++ 7909 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.310859180E09 +++$+++ Should the matter arise once more then I am tempted to go the ANI route, on the grounds of disruption and competence. One person on that \"side\" has already received a topic ban from Indian history articles etc but appears to continue to support generally in the background (this is {{u|Zuggernaut}}), and some form of limited topic ban for the others may soon be appropriate. -  +++$+++ :::Should the matter arise once more then I am tempted to go the ANI route, on the grounds of disruption and competence. One person on that "side" has already received a topic ban from Indian history articles etc but appears to continue to support generally in the background (this is {{u|Zuggernaut}}), and some form of limited topic ban for the others may soon be appropriate. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 16:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
7911 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7907 +++$+++ 7910 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310860500E09 +++$+++ I think it's too complex for AN\/I, and as it's multiple people it isn't appropriate for RFC\/U - maybe we need to ask on AN for advice on the best avenue? --  +++$+++ ::::I think it's too complex for AN/I, and as it's multiple people it isn't appropriate for RFC/U - maybe we need to ask on AN for advice on the best avenue? -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 16:55, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
7912 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7907 +++$+++ 7911 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.310861040E09 +++$+++ The complexity concerns me, wherever it goes. But it is looking like it does need to go somewhere. There have been a fair few admins involved around the fringes of this already but I am unsure how familiar they are with the detail of events. Will AN understand the complexities any better than ANI? Or have I misunderstood your point? Apart from the obvious, that is: this is now a lengthy \"incident\". -  +++$+++ :::::The complexity concerns me, wherever it goes. But it is looking like it does need to go somewhere. There have been a fair few admins involved around the fringes of this already but I am unsure how familiar they are with the detail of events. Will AN understand the complexities any better than ANI? Or have I misunderstood your point? Apart from the obvious, that is: this is now a lengthy "incident". - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 17:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
7913 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7907 +++$+++ 7912 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310861280E09 +++$+++ No, AN won't understand it any better, and I'm not expecting people there to be able solve the problem - I'm only suggesting that we ask for suggestions there as to how we should go about it --  +++$+++ ::::::No, AN won't understand it any better, and I'm not expecting people there to be able solve the problem - I'm only suggesting that we ask for suggestions there as to how we should go about it -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 17:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
7914 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7907 +++$+++ 7913 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.310862180E09 +++$+++ OK. So I need to draft something up in as neutral a manner as possible and which somehow manages to encapsulate the various issues in a couple of short-ish paragraphs. Yikes. -  +++$+++ :::::::OK. So I need to draft something up in as neutral a manner as possible and which somehow manages to encapsulate the various issues in a couple of short-ish paragraphs. Yikes. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 17:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
7915 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7907 +++$+++ 7914 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.310862660E09 +++$+++ Don't think a couple of short paras would do, no. I think I'd be tempted to put together something in some detail in user space, then go to AN and ask \"Where should we seek help with this?\" Hopefully a number of people would endorse it first - I expect I'll be happy to once I've seen it. --  +++$+++ ::::::::Don't think a couple of short paras would do, no. I think I'd be tempted to put together something in some detail in user space, then go to AN and ask "Where should we seek help with this?" Hopefully a number of people would endorse it first - I expect I'll be happy to once I've seen it. -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 17:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
7916 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7907 +++$+++ 7915 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.310935560E09 +++$+++ Started a draft but am holding off because RegentsPark and Salvio have now hatted the ridiculous thread at WT:INDIA, basically telling everyone to take it to the article talk page or DR, which is pretty much what I've been trying to explain for days now. Will see if this brings some order to things. -  +++$+++ :::::::::Started a draft but am holding off because RegentsPark and Salvio have now hatted the ridiculous thread at WT:INDIA, basically telling everyone to take it to the article talk page or DR, which is pretty much what I've been trying to explain for days now. Will see if this brings some order to things. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 13:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
7917 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7907 +++$+++ 7916 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.310935980E09 +++$+++ Ok, sounds good. I noticed Barek has protected Nair too, so we're starting to get a few more admins involved, which can only be a good thing --  +++$+++ ::::::::::Ok, sounds good. I noticed Barek has protected Nair too, so we're starting to get a few more admins involved, which can only be a good thing -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 13:53, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

270052 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270052 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-08 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.241787420E09 +++$+++ You mentioned on my talk page that you had blanked your talk page. Sometimes it is best just to clear away old discussions and make a fresh start. At some point, though, you should restore the links to your talk page archives and archive the discussions that got blanked. I personally archive everything - if you think others should be aware of previous discussions, I would archive them. I'd also like to thank you here for submitting a statement at the request for arbitration. I've now voted to accept and made a lengthy comment that I hope you and the other parties will read. At present, you and Karanacs are the only parties listed. One of the things that the arbitration committee need to decide on (after reading the other statements presented) is the scope of the case and whether any other parties need to be added. If you have any views on this, please let us know. I will ask Karanacs the same question.  +++$+++ You mentioned on my talk page that you had blanked your talk page. Sometimes it is best just to clear away old discussions and make a fresh start. At some point, though, you should restore the links to your talk page archives and archive the discussions that got blanked. I personally archive everything - if you think others should be aware of previous discussions, I would archive them. I'd also like to thank you here for submitting a statement at the request for arbitration. I've now voted to accept and made a lengthy comment that I hope you and the other parties will read. At present, you and Karanacs are the only parties listed. One of the things that the arbitration committee need to decide on (after reading the other statements presented) is the scope of the case and whether any other parties need to be added. If you have any views on this, please let us know. I will ask Karanacs the same question. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 05:57, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
270053 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270052 +++$+++ 270052 +++$+++ 2009-05-08 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.241829060E09 +++$+++ Carcharoth, perhaps it would be best, under the circumstances, if you allow someone else the privilege of suggesting to Mattisse how to manage her talk page.  No offense, just my opinion.  I suggest that Mattisse is feeling vulnerable right now and it is probably just best to stick to ArbCom business and leave it at that, plus make replies to whatever emails that she's indicated that she may make to you, as indicated on your talk page.  Just my armchair sort of thing, you know.  All the best.-- +++$+++ :Carcharoth, perhaps it would be best, under the circumstances, if you allow someone else the privilege of suggesting to Mattisse how to manage her talk page.  No offense, just my opinion.  I suggest that Mattisse is feeling vulnerable right now and it is probably just best to stick to ArbCom business and leave it at that, plus make replies to whatever emails that she's indicated that she may make to you, as indicated on your talk page.  Just my armchair sort of thing, you know.  All the best.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 17:31, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
270054 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270052 +++$+++ 270053 +++$+++ 2009-05-08 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.241840340E09 +++$+++ I think Mattisse should be allowed archive her talk as she pleases. No harm; the history is easily accessable if needs be. A long term and valued contributor is going through a difficult time; echo Wehwalt's pleade for space.  +++$+++ ::I think Mattisse should be allowed archive her talk as she pleases. No harm; the history is easily accessable if needs be. A long term and valued contributor is going through a difficult time; echo Wehwalt's pleade for space. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 20:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
270055 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270052 +++$+++ 270054 +++$+++ 2009-05-09 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.241868060E09 +++$+++ I could say a lot more about this, especially the last point about e-mail, but that is probably best left for another time. For now, I will give Mattisse (and others) space and time to consider what I've written above. Please remember that what I've written here is intended to allay any concerns Mattisse and others have about the arbitration process. I'm away for next 12 hours or so. Mattisse, please feel free to blank or archive this section after you have read what I've written here.  +++$+++ :::I could say a lot more about this, especially the last point about e-mail, but that is probably best left for another time. For now, I will give Mattisse (and others) space and time to consider what I've written above. Please remember that what I've written here is intended to allay any concerns Mattisse and others have about the arbitration process. I'm away for next 12 hours or so. Mattisse, please feel free to blank or archive this section after you have read what I've written here. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 04:21, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
270056 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270052 +++$+++ 270055 +++$+++ 2009-05-09 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.241868180E09 +++$+++ Ah, I missed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=288756455&oldid=288715094 this] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=288760112&oldid=288757598 this]. I should have checked there first. Apologies for that. Those diffs address at least one point I raised above. Hopefully the other points will also help reassure and aid the case to go smoothly.  +++$+++ ::::Ah, I missed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=288756455&oldid=288715094 this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=288760112&oldid=288757598 this]. I should have checked there first. Apologies for that. Those diffs address at least one point I raised above. Hopefully the other points will also help reassure and aid the case to go smoothly. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 04:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
270057 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270052 +++$+++ 270052 +++$+++ 2009-05-09 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.241871000E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, to echo earlier words, you are always welcome to talk on my page. This is likely to be a stressful sling fest, and it troubles me to see content people here. You have my ear if its needed.  +++$+++ :Mattisse, to echo earlier words, you are always welcome to talk on my page. This is likely to be a stressful sling fest, and it troubles me to see content people here. You have my ear if its needed. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 05:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
270058 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270052 +++$+++ 270057 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.241942100E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much. I value your support and open page. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::Thank you so much. I value your support and open page. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:55, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
270059 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270052 +++$+++ 270058 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.241982180E09 +++$+++ I have always found Carcharoth to be a good guy and approachable; I think its positive that he is making such an effort to see things from you side. It might not seem so right now, but you are widely respected and valued, I hope you are able to weather this, and it does not not taint the years you have been contributing to wiki. Ive been in similar situations before, where it seemed all were calling for my head, and well its obviously difficult and upsetting.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ACeoil].  +++$+++ :::I have always found Carcharoth to be a good guy and approachable; I think its positive that he is making such an effort to see things from you side. It might not seem so right now, but you are widely respected and valued, I hope you are able to weather this, and it does not not taint the years you have been contributing to wiki. Ive been in similar situations before, where it seemed all were calling for my head, and well its obviously difficult and upsetting.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ACeoil]. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 12:03, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
270060 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270052 +++$+++ 270059 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.241983020E09 +++$+++ For what its worth I have not even looked at the arbcom page, and I dont intend to. I dont need other people's openions to inform my own.  +++$+++ ::::For what its worth I have not even looked at the arbcom page, and I dont intend to. I dont need other people's openions to inform my own. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 12:17, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

532201 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ What is the situation with the High Adventure category?20:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ What is the situation with the High Adventure category?20:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
532202 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532201 +++$+++ 532201 +++$+++ 2006-02-06 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.139292000E09 +++$+++ I'm not completely sure what you are referring to regarding the high adventure category. However, what I assume you are talking about is the proposed name change. I think \"BSA national high adventure bases\" is more correct than \"BSA National High Adventure Bases\" as in most BSA publications it is not capitalized. When I created the category I capitalized it by accident. If you think it is correct as it is then please let me know so I can remove it from the name change list. Thanks and good job with all of the Scouting articles.  +++$+++ :I'm not completely sure what you are referring to regarding the high adventure category. However, what I assume you are talking about is the proposed name change. I think "BSA national high adventure bases" is more correct than "BSA National High Adventure Bases" as in most BSA publications it is not capitalized. When I created the category I capitalized it by accident. If you think it is correct as it is then please let me know so I can remove it from the name change list. Thanks and good job with all of the Scouting articles. [[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 22:00, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
532203 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532201 +++$+++ 532202 +++$+++ 2006-02-06 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.139292960E09 +++$+++ Actually, it should be [Boy Scouts of America national high adventure bases]]  +++$+++ ::Actually, it should be [Boy Scouts of America national high adventure bases]] [[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 22:16, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

270061 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-10 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.241941560E09 +++$+++ I was confused too, until I saw that the FAC had been [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/Archived_nominations\/May_2009&diff=288959467&oldid=288066025 archived].  +++$+++ I was confused too, until I saw that the FAC had been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Archived_nominations/May_2009&diff=288959467&oldid=288066025 archived]. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 00:46, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
270062 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270061 +++$+++ 270061 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.241941980E09 +++$+++ What does that mean? Does it mean it failed? I am still confused! &mdash; +++$+++ :What does that mean? Does it mean it failed? I am still confused! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
270063 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270061 +++$+++ 270062 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.241942220E09 +++$+++ Yes, it failed, probably because the nomination went stale due to lack of reviews (sigh). Thanks for all your reviewing and copy-editing, though.  +++$+++ ::Yes, it failed, probably because the nomination went stale due to lack of reviews (sigh). Thanks for all your reviewing and copy-editing, though. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 00:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

7918 +++$+++ Porchcorpter +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-18 10:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311009960E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'm just letting you know, if you don't mind, I have added your userbox [[:User:Boing! said Zebedee\/Userboxes\/noadmin]] to [[Wikipedia:Userboxes\/Wikipedia\/User groups]]. Cheers. -''''' +++$+++ Hi. I'm just letting you know, if you don't mind, I have added your userbox [[:User:Boing! said Zebedee/Userboxes/noadmin]] to [[Wikipedia:Userboxes/Wikipedia/User groups]]. Cheers. -'''''[[User:Porchcorpter|Porch corpter]]''''' <span style="font-size:12px;">([[User talk:Porchcorpter|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Porchcorpter|contribs]])</span> 10:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
7919 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7918 +++$+++ 7918 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311011760E09 +++$+++ Sure, and thanks - I guess I should really have done it myself --  +++$+++ :Sure, and thanks - I guess I should really have done it myself -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 10:56, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

532207 +++$+++ Eclectek +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532207 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-08 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.139394060E09 +++$+++ Why motion to have it deleted?  It hurts nobody.  Give peace a chance and userboxes longer than one month to be adopted.  +++$+++ Why motion to have it deleted?  It hurts nobody.  Give peace a chance and userboxes longer than one month to be adopted. [[User:Eclectek|Chad]] 02:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
532208 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532207 +++$+++ 532207 +++$+++ 2006-02-08 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.139440440E09 +++$+++ I motioned to delete it as per what had been [[Template talk:User UrsulineDallasStudent|discussed]] by [[User:LuckyPanda|LuckyPanda]] and I. Listen, I have no problem with the userbox except that I have some doubts that it will be adopted. It would have been best to have created this userbox like the Jesuit one. That is, after a group of editors from the school has been established. If you wish to keep it then vote for it to be kept. The good news for you is that I think no consensus will probably be reached on the template as many voted on the false knowledge that it had only been around for a week rather than over a month. Thanks.  +++$+++ :I motioned to delete it as per what had been [[Template talk:User UrsulineDallasStudent|discussed]] by [[User:LuckyPanda|LuckyPanda]] and I. Listen, I have no problem with the userbox except that I have some doubts that it will be adopted. It would have been best to have created this userbox like the Jesuit one. That is, after a group of editors from the school has been established. If you wish to keep it then vote for it to be kept. The good news for you is that I think no consensus will probably be reached on the template as many voted on the false knowledge that it had only been around for a week rather than over a month. Thanks. [[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 15:14, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

7920 +++$+++ 203.118.185.209 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.311070020E09 +++$+++ User:Bevinbell has falsely accused me of vandalism and reverted many of my recent edits. I removed additions made by Norm mit because I saw them as spam; one could agree or disagree with my edits, but they were made in good faith and were not vandalism. I note that you removed one of Norm mit's additions yourself (at [[Khmer language]]) and that Bevinbell did not revert you. Could you please explain to Bevinbell that I am not guilty of vandalism? [[Special:Contributions\/203.118.185.209|203.118.185.209]] ( +++$+++ User:Bevinbell has falsely accused me of vandalism and reverted many of my recent edits. I removed additions made by Norm mit because I saw them as spam; one could agree or disagree with my edits, but they were made in good faith and were not vandalism. I note that you removed one of Norm mit's additions yourself (at [[Khmer language]]) and that Bevinbell did not revert you. Could you please explain to Bevinbell that I am not guilty of vandalism? [[Special:Contributions/203.118.185.209|203.118.185.209]] ([[User talk:203.118.185.209|talk]]) 03:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
7921 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7920 +++$+++ 7920 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.311338880E09 +++$+++ I've added a comment at their user page (though I believe I was mistaken to remove that link) --  +++$+++ :I've added a comment at their user page (though I believe I was mistaken to remove that link) -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 05:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
7922 +++$+++ Bevinbell +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7920 +++$+++ 7921 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.311432120E09 +++$+++ I was mistaken, do not now beleive that anon was sockpuppet nor vandalizing, honest mistake and unfortunate timing.  +++$+++ ::I was mistaken, do not now beleive that anon was sockpuppet nor vandalizing, honest mistake and unfortunate timing. [[User:Bevinbell|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Bevin</span>''']][[User talk:Bevinbell|'''<span style="color:darkRed">bell'''</span>]] 07:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
7923 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7920 +++$+++ 7922 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.311439500E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for letting me know --  +++$+++ :::OK, thanks for letting me know -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 09:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

394536 +++$+++ SoothingR +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394536 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-27 05:53:00 +++$+++ 1.182948780E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. --'''<span style=\"color:#000088;\">\u2014\u2666\u2666 <\/span> +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. --'''<span style="color:#000088;">—♦♦ </span>[[User:SoothingR|<span style="color:#000088;">''S''ʘʘ''THING''</span>]][[User talk:SoothingR|<span style="color:#0066FF;"><sup>(Я)</sup></span>]]''' 05:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
394537 +++$+++ Anthony5429 +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394536 +++$+++ 394536 +++$+++ 2007-06-27 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.182974100E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'll take care of that. -- +++$+++ :Thanks. I'll take care of that. --[[User:Anthony5429|Anthony5429]] 12:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

532211 +++$+++ Curps +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-10 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.139623200E09 +++$+++ Autoblocks are temporary, you should be able to edit on that IP address within less than 24 hours. --  +++$+++ Autoblocks are temporary, you should be able to edit on that IP address within less than 24 hours. -- [[User:Curps|Curps]] 18:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
532212 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532211 +++$+++ 532211 +++$+++ 2006-02-10 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.139628540E09 +++$+++ Ok, I understand its only 24 hours or less for autoblocks. Thanks for responding. I am amazed at your abilities.  +++$+++ :Ok, I understand its only 24 hours or less for autoblocks. Thanks for responding. I am amazed at your abilities. [[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 19:29, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

7924 +++$+++ Crusoe8181 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.311096420E09 +++$+++ ...appears to be a place in India, too (when you search for it, as one of my user pages, not yet moved to main article space pending reliable references). Too many hoaxes, too little time, best to remove unless they can can be verified- Cheers  +++$+++ ...appears to be a place in India, too (when you search for it, as one of my user pages, not yet moved to main article space pending reliable references). Too many hoaxes, too little time, best to remove unless they can can be verified- Cheers [[User:Crusoe8181|Crusoe8181]] ([[User talk:Crusoe8181|talk]]) 10:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
7925 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7924 +++$+++ 7924 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.311338460E09 +++$+++ OK - it will need sources though, as you say, or people aren't going to believe it --  +++$+++ :OK - it will need sources though, as you say, or people aren't going to believe it -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 05:41, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

612990 +++$+++ Albert Einstien's ghost +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612990 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-13 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.200277620E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Albert Einstien&#39;s ghost|Albert Einstien&#39;s ghost]] ([[User talk:Albert Einstien&#39;s ghost|talk]]) 18:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
612991 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612990 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-13 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.200278400E09 +++$+++ Who are we to argue with Johnson when he says \"the issue of Intelligent Design, which really means the reality of God\"? [footnote 50] See also [[s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/2:Context#1. An Objective Observer Would Know that ID and Teaching About \u201cGaps\u201d and \u201cProblems\u201d in Evolutionary Theory are Creationist, Religious Strategies that Evolved from Earlier Forms of Creationism]] for a detailed and well-sourced assessment of this point. ..  +++$+++ ::Who are we to argue with Johnson when he says "the issue of Intelligent Design, which really means the reality of God"? [footnote 50] See also [[s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District/2:Context#1. An Objective Observer Would Know that ID and Teaching About “Gaps” and “Problems” in Evolutionary Theory are Creationist, Religious Strategies that Evolved from Earlier Forms of Creationism]] for a detailed and well-sourced assessment of this point. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
612992 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612990 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.200378540E09 +++$+++ Your belief carries no weight, and that's not a reliable source. ..  +++$+++ ::::Your belief carries no weight, and that's not a reliable source. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
612993 +++$+++ Albert Einstien's ghost +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612990 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.200380460E09 +++$+++ What do you mean by it carrying no weight? And how is a reliable source determined? -- +++$+++ :::::What do you mean by it carrying no weight? And how is a reliable source determined? --[[User:Albert Einstien&#39;s ghost|Albert Einstien&#39;s ghost]] ([[User talk:Albert Einstien&#39;s ghost|talk]]) 23:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
612994 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612990 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.200385020E09 +++$+++ [[WP:V]] is a core policy which tells you about reliable sources, as is [[WP:NOR]] which makes it clear that you can't just put your own ideas in, and the weight given to different views is determined by [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:NPOV\/FAQ]] policy. Hope that helps, . .   +++$+++ ::::::[[WP:V]] is a core policy which tells you about reliable sources, as is [[WP:NOR]] which makes it clear that you can't just put your own ideas in, and the weight given to different views is determined by [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:NPOV/FAQ]] policy. Hope that helps, . .  [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 00:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
612995 +++$+++ Albert Einstien's ghost +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612990 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.200428640E09 +++$+++ it helps some. -- +++$+++ :::::::it helps some. --[[User:Albert Einstien&#39;s ghost|Albert Einstien&#39;s ghost]] ([[User talk:Albert Einstien&#39;s ghost|talk]]) 12:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

7926 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7926 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311103260E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/Zuggernaut]]. Just FYI. -  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Zuggernaut]]. Just FYI. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 12:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
7927 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7926 +++$+++ 7926 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 09:16:00 +++$+++ 1.311264960E09 +++$+++ They were clear & I apologised ... but look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FQwyrxian&action=historysubmit&diff=440622889&oldid=440617166 this diff at Q's RfA]]. This is never-ending. -  +++$+++ :They were clear & I apologised ... but look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FQwyrxian&action=historysubmit&diff=440622889&oldid=440617166 this diff at Q's RfA]]. This is never-ending. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 09:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
7928 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7926 +++$+++ 7927 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311338340E09 +++$+++ I have to say I was surprised by the SPI outcome, but it's good to know one way or another. And wasn't Qwyrxian's answer good? [[Image:Teeth.png|16px]] --  +++$+++ ::I have to say I was surprised by the SPI outcome, but it's good to know one way or another. And wasn't Qwyrxian's answer good? [[Image:Teeth.png|16px]] -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 05:39, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
7929 +++$+++ Qwyrxian +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7926 +++$+++ 7928 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.311338520E09 +++$+++ {{tps}} Thanks!  +++$+++ :::{{tps}} Thanks! [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 05:42, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

270072 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-14 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.242360000E09 +++$+++ You will probably see this soon enough regardless, but it's best if it comes from me: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Evidence]].  I am not angry with you.  Now to be entirely fair, if there's anything you have to say regarding that evidence you are welcome to do so.  Is there a misplaced diff?  Has there been any failure to recognize a good faith motivation?  Is something mistaken in that evidence?  If there is, please supply a specific correction and I will amend the statement.  Is there missed context or anything else I should know?  I will wait 24 hours for a response, or until you resume editing, before proceeding to the workshop. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ You will probably see this soon enough regardless, but it's best if it comes from me: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Evidence]].  I am not angry with you.  Now to be entirely fair, if there's anything you have to say regarding that evidence you are welcome to do so.  Is there a misplaced diff?  Has there been any failure to recognize a good faith motivation?  Is something mistaken in that evidence?  If there is, please supply a specific correction and I will amend the statement.  Is there missed context or anything else I should know?  I will wait 24 hours for a response, or until you resume editing, before proceeding to the workshop. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 21:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
270073 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270072 +++$+++ 270072 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.242377940E09 +++$+++ You have resumed editing.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Street_newspaper&diff=prev&oldid=289984245]  Is there something you want to add here? <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :You have resumed editing.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Street_newspaper&diff=prev&oldid=289984245]  Is there something you want to add here? <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 01:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
270074 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270072 +++$+++ 270073 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.242426660E09 +++$+++ ?[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:193.113.48.17&diff=prev&oldid=290091093][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Pseudologia_fantastica&diff=prev&oldid=290090978]  If you wish to comment upon the evidence, please do so now.  This is not the sort of query that's possible to route through John Carter, since principally it asks what you were thinking.  Please respond, otherwise I may surmise that you have no meaningful response. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::?[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:193.113.48.17&diff=prev&oldid=290091093][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pseudologia_fantastica&diff=prev&oldid=290090978]  If you wish to comment upon the evidence, please do so now.  This is not the sort of query that's possible to route through John Carter, since principally it asks what you were thinking.  Please respond, otherwise I may surmise that you have no meaningful response. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 15:31, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
270075 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270072 +++$+++ 270074 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.242427260E09 +++$+++ If the query is why I reverted that edit, it is because the editor changed the spelling of the article from \"Pseudologia fantastica\" to \"Pseudologia fantasia\". I left a message on his page because I saw that there were already three from May, so I though that was a situation where a \"unconstructive edit\" message was warrented. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::*If the query is why I reverted that edit, it is because the editor changed the spelling of the article from "Pseudologia fantastica" to "Pseudologia fantasia". I left a message on his page because I saw that there were already three from May, so I though that was a situation where a "unconstructive edit" message was warrented. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
270076 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270072 +++$+++ 270074 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.242429300E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I want straight responses.  There will never be a better time for you to give them to me than now.  Do you have any comment or correction to make upon my evidence? <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::Mattisse, I want straight responses.  There will never be a better time for you to give them to me than now.  Do you have any comment or correction to make upon my evidence? <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 16:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
270077 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270072 +++$+++ 270076 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.242430260E09 +++$+++ Durova, I cannot make much sense of your evidence. There is a lot of background knowledge that you assume I have in your evidence that I don't know about.   John Carter will figure it out and respond as best he can on my behalf. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Durova, I cannot make much sense of your evidence. There is a lot of background knowledge that you assume I have in your evidence that I don't know about.   John Carter will figure it out and respond as best he can on my behalf. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:31, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

462903 +++$+++ Warrah +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 462903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-23 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.261630980E09 +++$+++ As an FYI - I did not tag the [[Poland Central School]] as an A7 because I felt it was a non-notable school.  If you go back and look, the A7 tag was for db-web -- the original article was called [[Www.polandcs.org]] and I was judging that version since it focused (barely) on the school's web site and not the school. Thanks.  +++$+++ As an FYI - I did not tag the [[Poland Central School]] as an A7 because I felt it was a non-notable school.  If you go back and look, the A7 tag was for db-web -- the original article was called [[Www.polandcs.org]] and I was judging that version since it focused (barely) on the school's web site and not the school. Thanks. [[User:Warrah|Warrah]] ([[User talk:Warrah|talk]]) 21:03, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
462904 +++$+++ Deon +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 462903 +++$+++ 462903 +++$+++ 2009-12-24 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.261693500E09 +++$+++ And again &mdash;  +++$+++ :And again &mdash; [[User:Deon|Deon]]<sup><font color="purple">[[User_talk:Deon|'''talk''']]</font></sup> 14:25, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

7930 +++$+++ CHAK 001 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311263520E09 +++$+++ |}  +++$+++ |} [[User:CHAK 001|CHAK <small>001</small>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:CHAK 001#top|Improvements? Please let me know!]])</small></sup> 08:52, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
7931 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7930 +++$+++ 7930 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311318120E09 +++$+++ That's kind, thanks --  +++$+++ :That's kind, thanks -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 00:02, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

7932 +++$+++ Bampublore +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311309240E09 +++$+++ --[[User:Bampublore|Bampublore]] ([[User talk:Bampublore|talk]]) 21:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)one user is abusing me please help me , please check my talk page . --[[User:Bampublore|Bampublore]] ([[User talk:Bampublore|talk]]) 21:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)-- +++$+++ --[[User:Bampublore|Bampublore]] ([[User talk:Bampublore|talk]]) 21:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)one user is abusing me please help me , please check my talk page . --[[User:Bampublore|Bampublore]] ([[User talk:Bampublore|talk]]) 21:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)--[[User:Bampublore|Bampublore]] ([[User talk:Bampublore|talk]]) 21:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
7933 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7932 +++$+++ 7932 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311317520E09 +++$+++ Hi, I don't really see any abuse, but I do see a lot of confusion and misunderstandings over basic issues. I suggest you take a break from editing and have a good read over the links in the Welcome message at the top of your Talk page - that should help you better understand the Wikipedia way of doing things --  +++$+++ :Hi, I don't really see any abuse, but I do see a lot of confusion and misunderstandings over basic issues. I suggest you take a break from editing and have a good read over the links in the Welcome message at the top of your Talk page - that should help you better understand the Wikipedia way of doing things -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 23:52, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

270078 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270078 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-15 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.242430800E09 +++$+++ I'm offering to do you a favor here.  Don't waste the offer. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ I'm offering to do you a favor here.  Don't waste the offer. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 16:40, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
270079 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270078 +++$+++ 270078 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.242431160E09 +++$+++ Durova, I cannot follow what you are saying to me nor determine what you want from me. I cannot understand what talking about here. If you have problems with John not notifying you about something, please take it up with him. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Durova, I cannot follow what you are saying to me nor determine what you want from me. I cannot understand what talking about here. If you have problems with John not notifying you about something, please take it up with him. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
270080 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270078 +++$+++ 270079 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.242431820E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, you are a featured article writer.  You have contributed 75 DYK articles.  You are one of this website's best copyeditors.  You presented competent and detailed evidence at the Zeraeph arbitration case.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Zeraeph\/Evidence&oldid=184254525#Evidence_presented_by_Mattisse]  And now you expect me to suppose all capacity for nuanced comprehension has inexplicably departed when it would do you the most good. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Mattisse, you are a featured article writer.  You have contributed 75 DYK articles.  You are one of this website's best copyeditors.  You presented competent and detailed evidence at the Zeraeph arbitration case.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Zeraeph/Evidence&oldid=184254525#Evidence_presented_by_Mattisse]  And now you expect me to suppose all capacity for nuanced comprehension has inexplicably departed when it would do you the most good. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 16:57, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
270081 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270078 +++$+++ 270080 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.242432000E09 +++$+++ And actually, Mattisse, I would have preferred if you hadn't restored the edit conflicted version.  But I won't edit war at your user talk.  This will be my final attempt to interact productively on this matter; an offer to tone down my evidence shouldn't become a new bone of contention. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::And actually, Mattisse, I would have preferred if you hadn't restored the edit conflicted version.  But I won't edit war at your user talk.  This will be my final attempt to interact productively on this matter; an offer to tone down my evidence shouldn't become a new bone of contention. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 17:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
270082 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270078 +++$+++ 270081 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.242432600E09 +++$+++ Writing content about subjects I know is completely different than trying to understand your logic or the issues you present in your evidence.  I do not feel you and I understand each other at all. We are on completely different wavelengths.  I don't understand where you are coming from or what your goals are regarding me. I believe to pursue this further is futile. I think it is best if we have no further contact.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::: Writing content about subjects I know is completely different than trying to understand your logic or the issues you present in your evidence.  I do not feel you and I understand each other at all. We are on completely different wavelengths.  I don't understand where you are coming from or what your goals are regarding me. I believe to pursue this further is futile. I think it is best if we have no further contact.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
270083 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270078 +++$+++ 270078 +++$+++ 2009-05-16 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.242465960E09 +++$+++ I do not necessarily think that I am obliged to express my feelings to you. If you want to hear from me, you can post on the talk page of one of the ArbCom pages or elsewhere and ask. I want John Carter to relay my comments during the course of this arbitration to reduce the amount of pressure on me. I can't see how anyone would have any real cause to object to this plan. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ * I do not necessarily think that I am obliged to express my feelings to you. If you want to hear from me, you can post on the talk page of one of the ArbCom pages or elsewhere and ask. I want John Carter to relay my comments during the course of this arbitration to reduce the amount of pressure on me. I can't see how anyone would have any real cause to object to this plan. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

7936 +++$+++ MangoWong +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7936 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311379980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message above the edit box. It is really astounding to see a message pop up when I opened the edit box. I hope you don't mind me disturbing you, but I do think that I should inform you about this. I have reported Sitush at WP\/ANI and also mentioned you in the report.- +++$+++ Thanks for the message above the edit box. It is really astounding to see a message pop up when I opened the edit box. I hope you don't mind me disturbing you, but I do think that I should inform you about this. I have reported Sitush at WP/ANI and also mentioned you in the report.-[[User:MangoWong|MangoWong]] ([[User talk:MangoWong|talk]]) 17:13, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
7937 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7936 +++$+++ 7936 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.311380400E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for letting me know --  +++$+++ :OK, thanks for letting me know -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 17:20, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

7938 +++$+++ MatthewVanitas +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311387000E09 +++$+++ This IP has posted a thinly-veiled threat about \"militias\" and then an ''extremely'' coarse mockery about predicted future Pashtun suffering in Afghanistan (which I imagine looks even worse through South Asian eyes than through Anglo). Is this enough to just block off his IP, or anything really to be done for someone we can't easily pin down? My post here covers his diffs: [[User talk:84.59.190.210]]  +++$+++ This IP has posted a thinly-veiled threat about "militias" and then an ''extremely'' coarse mockery about predicted future Pashtun suffering in Afghanistan (which I imagine looks even worse through South Asian eyes than through Anglo). Is this enough to just block off his IP, or anything really to be done for someone we can't easily pin down? My post here covers his diffs: [[User talk:84.59.190.210]] [[User:MatthewVanitas|MatthewVanitas]] ([[User talk:MatthewVanitas|talk]]) 19:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
7939 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7938 +++$+++ 7938 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.311387480E09 +++$+++ I've blocked for 24 hours and done a RevDel on the intermediate edits - please let me know if you see it happen again --  +++$+++ :I've blocked for 24 hours and done a RevDel on the intermediate edits - please let me know if you see it happen again -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 19:18, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
7940 +++$+++ MatthewVanitas +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7938 +++$+++ 7939 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311388080E09 +++$+++ There's no way, at my level, that I can put a ''User'' on my Watchlist, is there? I've had folks messing around where I'd really like to know when they edit, since I see blantant patterns of poor editing, but without a way to track them it's hard to check back in on them, especially if they go dormant and then return to disruption later. More an issue with regs than IPs, but still.  +++$+++ ::There's no way, at my level, that I can put a ''User'' on my Watchlist, is there? I've had folks messing around where I'd really like to know when they edit, since I see blantant patterns of poor editing, but without a way to track them it's hard to check back in on them, especially if they go dormant and then return to disruption later. More an issue with regs than IPs, but still. [[User:MatthewVanitas|MatthewVanitas]] ([[User talk:MatthewVanitas|talk]]) 19:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
7941 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7938 +++$+++ 7940 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311388740E09 +++$+++ Nah, nobody can watch a user - what I do is bookmark their contributions page and check a couple of times a day --  +++$+++ :::Nah, nobody can watch a user - what I do is bookmark their contributions page and check a couple of times a day -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 19:39, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
7942 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7938 +++$+++ 7941 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311390840E09 +++$+++ That is sort of what MW has done for you (BsZ) and other admins involved in the recent palaver, except he has sandboxed it. -  +++$+++ ::::That is sort of what MW has done for you (BsZ) and other admins involved in the recent palaver, except he has sandboxed it. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 20:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
7943 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7938 +++$+++ 7942 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311391560E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I see it. I don't mind really - everything I do is open for all to see --  +++$+++ :::::Yeah, I see it. I don't mind really - everything I do is open for all to see -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 20:26, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
7944 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7938 +++$+++ 7943 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311391740E09 +++$+++ Oh, yeah. I was just pointing out that there is more than one way to do it. Happen I think MW's method is a little overcomplicated but s\/he'll probably have reasons for it. -  +++$+++ ::::::Oh, yeah. I was just pointing out that there is more than one way to do it. Happen I think MW's method is a little overcomplicated but s/he'll probably have reasons for it. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 20:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

532228 +++$+++ LiquidGhoul +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-17 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.140185160E09 +++$+++ I am very glad you are not cruel to animals, but after hearing what some people will do to frogs, I kind of have a pessimistic view on the matter. Again, I'm very sorry for jumping to conslusions. -- +++$+++ I am very glad you are not cruel to animals, but after hearing what some people will do to frogs, I kind of have a pessimistic view on the matter. Again, I'm very sorry for jumping to conslusions. --[[User:LiquidGhoul|liquidGhoul]] 06:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
532229 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532228 +++$+++ 532228 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.140185400E09 +++$+++ I see what you mean. Photography really isn't my specialty anyway. Have a nice day.  +++$+++ :I see what you mean. Photography really isn't my specialty anyway. Have a nice day. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 06:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
532230 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532228 +++$+++ 532228 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.140191640E09 +++$+++ My apologies, but please try to use edit summaries. If you did this wouldn't have happened as at quick glance your edits looked like minor vandalism. Have a nice day. +++$+++ :My apologies, but please try to use edit summaries. If you did this wouldn't have happened as at quick glance your edits looked like minor vandalism. Have a nice day.[[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 07:54, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

270085 +++$+++ Iridescent +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270085 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-15 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.242427380E09 +++$+++ I've [[User_talk:DGG#Lordship_Lane.2C_Haringey|asked User:DGG here]] if he has any thoughts about what, if anything, can be done to rescue this article, which currently seems to have pretty much every problem issue going. (I've involved him as he was the one who made the loudest and most reasoned defense of \"minor road\" articles last time the issue came up, so I thought he'd be best placed to make suggestions of how it could be kept.) As it was yourself who originally tagged it for cleanup back in 2007, you may want to comment.&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;'''<font style=\"font-family: Courier\"><font color=\"#E45E05\"> +++$+++ I've [[User_talk:DGG#Lordship_Lane.2C_Haringey|asked User:DGG here]] if he has any thoughts about what, if anything, can be done to rescue this article, which currently seems to have pretty much every problem issue going. (I've involved him as he was the one who made the loudest and most reasoned defense of "minor road" articles last time the issue came up, so I thought he'd be best placed to make suggestions of how it could be kept.) As it was yourself who originally tagged it for cleanup back in 2007, you may want to comment.&nbsp;–&nbsp;'''<font style="font-family: Courier"><font color="#E45E05">[[User:Iridescent|iride]]</font><font color="#C1118C">[[User talk:Iridescent|scent]]</font></font>''' 15:43, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
270086 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270085 +++$+++ 270085 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.242430560E09 +++$+++ I don't know anything about road articles at all. I have never worked on a road article and I have no suggestions regarding this one. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I don't know anything about road articles at all. I have never worked on a road article and I have no suggestions regarding this one. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
270087 +++$+++ Brianhe +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270085 +++$+++ 270086 +++$+++ 2009-05-18 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.242652020E09 +++$+++ Maybe you are forgetting [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lordship_Lane,_Haringey&oldid=166098573 this edit]? --  +++$+++ ::Maybe you are forgetting [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lordship_Lane,_Haringey&oldid=166098573 this edit]? -- [[User:Brianhe|Brianhe]] ([[User talk:Brianhe|talk]]) 06:07, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
270088 +++$+++ Iridescent +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270085 +++$+++ 270087 +++$+++ 2009-05-18 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.242662700E09 +++$+++ All Mattisse did was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lordship_Lane,_Haringey&diff=prev&oldid=166098573 tag it for cleanup], not edit it in any way; I've mentioned it here as a courtesy in case M has any suggestions, as there's a (belated) discussion about what form the cleanup should take.&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;'''''<font color=\"#E45E05\"> +++$+++ :::All Mattisse did was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lordship_Lane,_Haringey&diff=prev&oldid=166098573 tag it for cleanup], not edit it in any way; I've mentioned it here as a courtesy in case M has any suggestions, as there's a (belated) discussion about what form the cleanup should take.&nbsp;–&nbsp;'''''<font color="#E45E05">[[User:Iridescent|iride]]</font><font color="#C1118C">[[User talk:Iridescent|scent]]</font>''''' 09:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

532231 +++$+++ Hansnesse +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532231 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-17 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.140192000E09 +++$+++ Howdy, I noticed you reverted the changes on [[Supreme crime]]; I think the changes were legitimate and took the liberty of changing them back.  I assume that you'd misread the largescale changes as vandalism and reverted.  But per the discussion on the [[Talk:Supreme crime#Deleted material from religious dispensationalism|talk page]], I wanted to be sure.  Sorry to trouble you and keep up the good work, -- +++$+++ Howdy, I noticed you reverted the changes on [[Supreme crime]]; I think the changes were legitimate and took the liberty of changing them back.  I assume that you'd misread the largescale changes as vandalism and reverted.  But per the discussion on the [[Talk:Supreme crime#Deleted material from religious dispensationalism|talk page]], I wanted to be sure.  Sorry to trouble you and keep up the good work, --[[User:Hansnesse|Hansnesse]] 08:00, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
532232 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532231 +++$+++ 532231 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.140192180E09 +++$+++ Yeah, you're right. Next time someone makes such dramatic changes they need to leave an edit summary. To the outsider it looked like vandalism at first glance. Have a good one!  +++$+++ :Yeah, you're right. Next time someone makes such dramatic changes they need to leave an edit summary. To the outsider it looked like vandalism at first glance. Have a good one! [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 08:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
532233 +++$+++ Hansnesse +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532231 +++$+++ 532232 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 08:11:00 +++$+++ 1.140192660E09 +++$+++ Many thanks, keep fighting the good fight.  I'll make a note of this on the article talk page. -- +++$+++ ::Many thanks, keep fighting the good fight.  I'll make a note of this on the article talk page. --[[User:Hansnesse|Hansnesse]] 08:11, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

7945 +++$+++ Yogesh Khandke +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7945 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311477660E09 +++$+++ Please look at this edit[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AGanges&action=historysubmit&diff=440611922&oldid=440611176], could you take some action on such insults to (a)India (b)Indian editors (c)Wikipedia policy makers, a provocative statement, as an admin, please. +++$+++ Please look at this edit[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGanges&action=historysubmit&diff=440611922&oldid=440611176], could you take some action on such insults to (a)India (b)Indian editors (c)Wikipedia policy makers, a provocative statement, as an admin, please.[[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 20:21, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
7946 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7945 +++$+++ 7945 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.311478260E09 +++$+++ Hmm, yes, that does seem to be a bit of a provocative allegation - and I certainly do not agree with the sentiment apparently being expressed. I don't really have time to look at it right now as I'm just off for the evening, and it does require some digging into the background. But I will try to have a look at it tomorrow and offer my thoughts. --  +++$+++ :Hmm, yes, that does seem to be a bit of a provocative allegation - and I certainly do not agree with the sentiment apparently being expressed. I don't really have time to look at it right now as I'm just off for the evening, and it does require some digging into the background. But I will try to have a look at it tomorrow and offer my thoughts. -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 20:31, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
7947 +++$+++ Yogesh Khandke +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7945 +++$+++ 7946 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311478440E09 +++$+++ I can provide enough to keep you busy for many evenings. Have a nice weekend. +++$+++ ::I can provide enough to keep you busy for many evenings. Have a nice weekend.[[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 20:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
7948 +++$+++ Yogesh Khandke +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7945 +++$+++ 7947 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.311531420E09 +++$+++ (unrelated to above) I have pasted the blog link <link to personal attack redacted> on Jimmy Wales and Sue Gardner talk pages, fyi. +++$+++ :::(unrelated to above) I have pasted the blog link <link to personal attack redacted> on Jimmy Wales and Sue Gardner talk pages, fyi.[[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 11:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

532234 +++$+++ Spudderly +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-17 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.140193500E09 +++$+++ I got a user name and I read about edit summaries.  I will be more careful next time I see and error.  +++$+++ I got a user name and I read about edit summaries.  I will be more careful next time I see and error. [[User:Spudderly|Spudderly]] 08:25, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
532235 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532234 +++$+++ 532234 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.140229380E09 +++$+++ Good idea to get a user name. Have a nice day!  +++$+++ :Good idea to get a user name. Have a nice day! [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 18:23, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
532236 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532234 +++$+++ 532234 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.140248640E09 +++$+++ Yes, you did make some constructive edits to the article, however, they were followed by non-sense, removal of large amounts of content or other edits deemed to be vandalism. Then you began blanking the page and taking part in other inappropriate acts. That is why you were warned. Thank you.  +++$+++ :Yes, you did make some constructive edits to the article, however, they were followed by non-sense, removal of large amounts of content or other edits deemed to be vandalism. Then you began blanking the page and taking part in other inappropriate acts. That is why you were warned. Thank you. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 23:44, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
532237 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532234 +++$+++ 532234 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.140252180E09 +++$+++ Here's what you did wrong. This [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wu-Tang_Clan_affiliates&oldid=40069106], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wu-Tang_Clan_affiliates&oldid=40068755], and this unconstructive\/unencyclopedic addition of content [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wu-Tang_Clan_affiliates&diff=next&oldid=40066464]  +++$+++ :Here's what you did wrong. This [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wu-Tang_Clan_affiliates&oldid=40069106], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wu-Tang_Clan_affiliates&oldid=40068755], and this unconstructive/unencyclopedic addition of content [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wu-Tang_Clan_affiliates&diff=next&oldid=40066464] [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 00:43, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
532238 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532234 +++$+++ 532237 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.140252480E09 +++$+++ Here's some more content issues [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wu-Tang_Clan_affiliates&diff=40065417&oldid=40065215]. I am not mistaken and if you continue to leave unsigned, evidence-less comments on my talk page you may be '''blocked'''.  +++$+++ ::Here's some more content issues [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wu-Tang_Clan_affiliates&diff=40065417&oldid=40065215]. I am not mistaken and if you continue to leave unsigned, evidence-less comments on my talk page you may be '''blocked'''. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 00:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
532239 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532234 +++$+++ 532234 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.140253320E09 +++$+++ My apologies. I was looking for key terms such as dirty which are commonly used in vandalism. You are correct that this is a computer term, however, I would suggest using a more encyclopedic word that isn't computer slang. Also, to avoid this problem in the future please use edit summaries and you might want to consider getting an account.  +++$+++ :My apologies. I was looking for key terms such as dirty which are commonly used in vandalism. You are correct that this is a computer term, however, I would suggest using a more encyclopedic word that isn't computer slang. Also, to avoid this problem in the future please use edit summaries and you might want to consider getting an account. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 01:02, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

270091 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-20 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.242805680E09 +++$+++ And I'm sure you will want to ask me why the quote box was included...I know it's probably not very encyclopedic, but it's just so pretty I couldn't help myself. (And for now it's only in my userspace anyway, so anything goes!) <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ And I'm sure you will want to ask me why the quote box was included...I know it's probably not very encyclopedic, but it's just so pretty I couldn't help myself. (And for now it's only in my userspace anyway, so anything goes!) <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 00:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
270092 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270091 +++$+++ 270091 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.242806280E09 +++$+++ Thanks! It is a subject that I have a fair amount of experience regarding. I will be happy to take a look. There are books on it and probably journal articles. I have never researched the literature, but I have some old books so there must be more. Of course, community mental health has taken over and state hospitals are closing down. Did you look under [[deinstitutionalization]] also? And prisons have their own mental health facilities these days. Don't know if you want to get into that. And sex offenders have their own prison mental health facilities some places. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks! It is a subject that I have a fair amount of experience regarding. I will be happy to take a look. There are books on it and probably journal articles. I have never researched the literature, but I have some old books so there must be more. Of course, community mental health has taken over and state hospitals are closing down. Did you look under [[deinstitutionalization]] also? And prisons have their own mental health facilities these days. Don't know if you want to get into that. And sex offenders have their own prison mental health facilities some places. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:58, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

7949 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311628860E09 +++$+++ ... in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&action=historysubmit&diff=441351187&oldid=441350820 this]. There are some serious accusations being made + another repeat of the blog. -  +++$+++ ... in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&action=historysubmit&diff=441351187&oldid=441350820 this]. There are some serious accusations being made + another repeat of the blog. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 14:21, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
7950 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7949 +++$+++ 7949 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.311629520E09 +++$+++ Interesting. I somehow can't see that promoting those blog accusations is going to result in anything but a boomerang, but we shall have to wait and see - I won't comment there yet (bit busy anyway, but I'd rather sit back first and see what others might have to say) --  +++$+++ :Interesting. I somehow can't see that promoting those blog accusations is going to result in anything but a boomerang, but we shall have to wait and see - I won't comment there yet (bit busy anyway, but I'd rather sit back first and see what others might have to say) -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 14:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

7951 +++$+++ Salvio giuliano +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7951 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311659580E09 +++$+++ Hello BsZ, I just wanted to let you know you've been mentioned on my talk page, [[User talk:Salvio giuliano#Thanks|here]]. Cheers. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml\">  ''' +++$+++ Hello BsZ, I just wanted to let you know you've been mentioned on my talk page, [[User talk:Salvio giuliano#Thanks|here]]. Cheers. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">  '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> [[User talk:Salvio giuliano| <sup>Let's talk about it!</sup>]] 22:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
7952 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7951 +++$+++ 7951 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.311660180E09 +++$+++ Got it, thanks --  +++$+++ :Got it, thanks -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 23:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

532240 +++$+++ Krash +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-18 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.140258240E09 +++$+++ Please revisit [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Sma\u017een\xfd S\xfdr]] and consider the current revision of [[Sma\u017een\xfd S\xfdr]]. --&nbsp; +++$+++ Please revisit [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smažený Sýr]] and consider the current revision of [[Smažený Sýr]]. --&nbsp;[[User:Krash|Krash]]&nbsp;<small>([[User talk:Krash|Talk]])</small> 02:24, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
532241 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532240 +++$+++ 532240 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.140271320E09 +++$+++ At first glance your edits looked very much like vandalism as I was fitering for key words and as you can guess masturbate is one of them. I have reverted my revertion as per some research I have done regarding the link you gave me. Please consider getting an account. Thanks.  +++$+++ :At first glance your edits looked very much like vandalism as I was fitering for key words and as you can guess masturbate is one of them. I have reverted my revertion as per some research I have done regarding the link you gave me. Please consider getting an account. Thanks. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 06:02, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
532242 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532240 +++$+++ 532240 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.140273960E09 +++$+++ I have no problem with your opinion regarding the essay. However, expressing it on the article is inappropriate and is considered vandalism. If you wish to express some constructive comments and thoughts regarding the essay you are welcome to do so on the article's talk page. Thank you.  +++$+++ :I have no problem with your opinion regarding the essay. However, expressing it on the article is inappropriate and is considered vandalism. If you wish to express some constructive comments and thoughts regarding the essay you are welcome to do so on the article's talk page. Thank you. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 06:46, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
532243 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532240 +++$+++ 532240 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.140274260E09 +++$+++ Good question. I must agree with you on this regarding the quality of the essay.  +++$+++ :Good question. I must agree with you on this regarding the quality of the essay. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 06:51, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

569304 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.165476000E09 +++$+++ I'm not criticising. Just saying that if I tag them I will warn them, so if you find an article that I have tagged you can be certain that I will warn them, and you need not do so.-- +++$+++ I'm not criticising. Just saying that if I tag them I will warn them, so if you find an article that I have tagged you can be certain that I will warn them, and you need not do so.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 23:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
569305 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569304 +++$+++ 569304 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.165476300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification - if only other editors were so conscientious in their patrolling!  I do so because the Talk pages are red links and letting vandalism go by without acknowledgement benefits no one.  Tonight's edit conflicts probably occurred as we were both patrolling the same area of the new articles list.  I'm off to bed now, so the matter ends here. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks for the clarification - if only other editors were so conscientious in their patrolling!  I do so because the Talk pages are red links and letting vandalism go by without acknowledgement benefits no one.  Tonight's edit conflicts probably occurred as we were both patrolling the same area of the new articles list.  I'm off to bed now, so the matter ends here. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
569306 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569304 +++$+++ 569305 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.165476480E09 +++$+++ Best wishes.-- +++$+++ ::Best wishes.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 23:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
569307 +++$+++ Adam Riley +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569304 +++$+++ 569304 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 06:16:00 +++$+++ 1.165500960E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I'm sorry about that.  When I started doing that, he was not blocked.  The block must have taken place while I was writing it.  Anyways, I was interested in taking a more involved role with vandalism.  Do you have any suggestions for me? -- +++$+++ * Hi.  I'm sorry about that.  When I started doing that, he was not blocked.  The block must have taken place while I was writing it.  Anyways, I was interested in taking a more involved role with vandalism.  Do you have any suggestions for me? --[[User:Adam Riley|Riley]] 06:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
569308 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569304 +++$+++ 569304 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.165536420E09 +++$+++ If you want to get more involved in preventing vandalism, take a look at [[:Wikipedia:Vandalism]] for information.  You can also patrol the [[:Special:Newpages|new pages]] and [[:Special:Recentchanges|recent changes]] pages.  [[:Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|The policy for speedy deletions]] will give you information about tagging articles and repeat offenders can be warned with [[:Wikipedia:Template messages\/User talk namespace|vandalism messages]].  People who vandalise page the fourth warning can be reported to [[:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard|the administrators' noticeboard]] for blocking.  +++$+++ :If you want to get more involved in preventing vandalism, take a look at [[:Wikipedia:Vandalism]] for information.  You can also patrol the [[:Special:Newpages|new pages]] and [[:Special:Recentchanges|recent changes]] pages.  [[:Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|The policy for speedy deletions]] will give you information about tagging articles and repeat offenders can be warned with [[:Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace|vandalism messages]].  People who vandalise page the fourth warning can be reported to [[:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard|the administrators' noticeboard]] for blocking. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 16:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

7955 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.311776100E09 +++$+++ This [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Vikraantkaka&curid=30732921&diff=441669180&oldid=438843739 edit on their talk page] is the first since {{u|Vikraantkaka}} was blocked for a couple of days on 11 July. It is baffling (the first 4 characters may be \"eyes\" ?). Just a little concerned that something may be going on, or about to happen. -  +++$+++ This [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vikraantkaka&curid=30732921&diff=441669180&oldid=438843739 edit on their talk page] is the first since {{u|Vikraantkaka}} was blocked for a couple of days on 11 July. It is baffling (the first 4 characters may be "eyes" ?). Just a little concerned that something may be going on, or about to happen. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 07:15, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
7956 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7955 +++$+++ 7955 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.311779880E09 +++$+++ Curious - I'll keep my 3Y3 on it --  +++$+++ :Curious - I'll keep my 3Y3 on it -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 08:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
7957 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7955 +++$+++ 7956 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.311780180E09 +++$+++ Now deleted and protesting innocence. Again. -  +++$+++ ::Now deleted and protesting innocence. Again. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 08:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

532244 +++$+++ Spudderly +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-18 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.140276420E09 +++$+++ And what role do you play Dustmagic?  How did you know I had changed that article? Are you on guard for a shift, and respond to all edits, or is that job shared by others or do you only respond when certain articles are edited?  +++$+++ And what role do you play Dustmagic?  How did you know I had changed that article? Are you on guard for a shift, and respond to all edits, or is that job shared by others or do you only respond when certain articles are edited? [[User:Spudderly|Spudderly]] 07:27, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
532245 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532244 +++$+++ 532244 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.140276840E09 +++$+++ I am a recent changes patroller. I was watching IP edits and saw that you had changed the article and mistakenly reverted your edits. Please see the following link to learn more about vandal fighting and how you can help. To see who made the changes you can look at the history tab of the article. Thanks. I'm glad you're interested. Click [[Wikipedia:Recent changes patrol|here]] to learn more. Have a great day!  +++$+++ :I am a recent changes patroller. I was watching IP edits and saw that you had changed the article and mistakenly reverted your edits. Please see the following link to learn more about vandal fighting and how you can help. To see who made the changes you can look at the history tab of the article. Thanks. I'm glad you're interested. Click [[Wikipedia:Recent changes patrol|here]] to learn more. Have a great day! [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 07:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
532246 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532244 +++$+++ 532244 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.140277860E09 +++$+++ I don't really know much about [[Varadero]], but I can try to help out.  +++$+++ :I don't really know much about [[Varadero]], but I can try to help out. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 07:51, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

7958 +++$+++ MatthewVanitas +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.311906660E09 +++$+++ Greetings Zeb, once I get some time this evening I'll be filing an ANI on Yogesh. Today he brough up \"that blog\" ''again'', and despite his coy claims \"I'm not saying it's true, it's just important to see how WP's credibility is damaged\", he clearly implies that you, Sitush, CT, and I are under investigation by Jimbo and will get our comeuppance. Basically still clearly using the blog to undermine others. Also still throwing around vague accusations  (bias, grudge, incompetence) that any legit editor would take to ANI, but by not doing so and just dragging them up he's being disruptive and basically constantly PAing. Of course, he ''did'' file an ANI and not a single one of us was criticized by outside editors. I hate to drag you into this since I know now the caste-crufters are claiming you're a pet attack admin and all, but just mentioning in case you want in on the ANI as PA'ed party, especially as YK keeps tossing around claims of \"incompetent admin\" which again is totally unsat unless you're bringing up an actual ANI (and he did, and it failed).  Anyway, here's a discussion which includes some diffs; will try to file ANI later tonight: [[User_talk:MatthewVanitas#Malaise]].  +++$+++ Greetings Zeb, once I get some time this evening I'll be filing an ANI on Yogesh. Today he brough up "that blog" ''again'', and despite his coy claims "I'm not saying it's true, it's just important to see how WP's credibility is damaged", he clearly implies that you, Sitush, CT, and I are under investigation by Jimbo and will get our comeuppance. Basically still clearly using the blog to undermine others. Also still throwing around vague accusations  (bias, grudge, incompetence) that any legit editor would take to ANI, but by not doing so and just dragging them up he's being disruptive and basically constantly PAing. Of course, he ''did'' file an ANI and not a single one of us was criticized by outside editors. I hate to drag you into this since I know now the caste-crufters are claiming you're a pet attack admin and all, but just mentioning in case you want in on the ANI as PA'ed party, especially as YK keeps tossing around claims of "incompetent admin" which again is totally unsat unless you're bringing up an actual ANI (and he did, and it failed).  Anyway, here's a discussion which includes some diffs; will try to file ANI later tonight: [[User_talk:MatthewVanitas#Malaise]]. [[User:MatthewVanitas|MatthewVanitas]] ([[User talk:MatthewVanitas|talk]]) 19:31, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
7959 +++$+++ MatthewVanitas +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7958 +++$+++ 7958 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.311906660E09 +++$+++ Oh, buddy compared me to the Oslo bomber, then tried to weasel his way out of it being a PA without retracting it in the slighest. Stay classy, Yogesh.  +++$+++ :Oh, buddy compared me to the Oslo bomber, then tried to weasel his way out of it being a PA without retracting it in the slighest. Stay classy, Yogesh. [[User:MatthewVanitas|MatthewVanitas]] ([[User talk:MatthewVanitas|talk]]) 19:31, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
7960 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7958 +++$+++ 7959 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311913800E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for letting me know. I'll sleep on it and decide how to respond --  +++$+++ ::OK, thanks for letting me know. I'll sleep on it and decide how to respond -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 21:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
7961 +++$+++ Msreddy004 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7958 +++$+++ 7958 +++$+++ 2010-10-18 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.287464460E09 +++$+++ \"Ohhh Yet again the d-Bag <B>MatthewVanitas<\/B> Ranting nonsense\".... I would love to agree those claims, but I have asked more than once to prove the reasoning behind marking and locking the classification and I quote <B><I>\"ensure to get a good academic citation to backup what you claim\"<\/I><\/B>. This time around please come up with a reliable source backed up by academic citation stating that \"Reddy's were not kings or are not Kshatriyas\" as opposed to your willy-nilly personal preferences without any verifiable publication\/citations by or from reputable source(s). Good luck. +++$+++ *"Ohhh Yet again the d-Bag <B>MatthewVanitas</B> Ranting nonsense".... I would love to agree those claims, but I have asked more than once to prove the reasoning behind marking and locking the classification and I quote <B><I>"ensure to get a good academic citation to backup what you claim"</I></B>. This time around please come up with a reliable source backed up by academic citation stating that "Reddy's were not kings or are not Kshatriyas" as opposed to your willy-nilly personal preferences without any verifiable publication/citations by or from reputable source(s). Good luck.[[User:Msreddy004|Msreddy004]] ([[User talk:Msreddy004|talk]]) 22:01, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
7962 +++$+++ Msreddy004 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7958 +++$+++ 7958 +++$+++ 2010-10-18 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.287462360E09 +++$+++ \"<B>@ Matthew Vanitas<\/B>\" - That is exactly my point <B>'Einstein'<\/B>. When you do not have evidence to back up what you claim - why have you marked the classification as you please ? That purely show how immature you are and how low your thoughts are. I am sure someone from Reddy Community has taken you for a royal spin and I believe that suits well for a c0ward like yourself. Anyway here are a couple of links - knock your self off. <ref>\"http:\/\/hubpages.com\/hub\/REDDIS-OF-KONDAVEEDU\" <\/ref> <ref> \"http:\/\/www.rajahmundry.net\/history.aspx#Rajamahendravaram_reddy\"<\/ref>. I am quite sure that is not good enough for you as your soo deep up yours 'you know what' & btw you still have to prove that you are an <B> expert <\/B> and the unbiased source of your reasoning (if there is ONE) to mark & lock this article's classification. Since you cannot prove otherwise by providing \"quote 'reputable footnote'\" it should be deleted - \"Its very simple\" in your own words. Oh BTW I google'd\/bing'd & ask'd \"Matthew Vanitas\" and the result was four letter word starts with an <B>\"S\"<\/B> followed by <B>\"H\"<\/B> followed<B> \"I\"<\/B> and yes - YES you know this and you are RIGHT this <B> ONE TIME <\/B>, its ending with <B>\"T\"<\/B> - how true is that. Have a good day.  +++$+++ * "<B>@ Matthew Vanitas</B>" - That is exactly my point <B>'Einstein'</B>. When you do not have evidence to back up what you claim - why have you marked the classification as you please ? That purely show how immature you are and how low your thoughts are. I am sure someone from Reddy Community has taken you for a royal spin and I believe that suits well for a c0ward like yourself. Anyway here are a couple of links - knock your self off. <ref>"http://hubpages.com/hub/REDDIS-OF-KONDAVEEDU" </ref> <ref> "http://www.rajahmundry.net/history.aspx#Rajamahendravaram_reddy"</ref>. I am quite sure that is not good enough for you as your soo deep up yours 'you know what' & btw you still have to prove that you are an <B> expert </B> and the unbiased source of your reasoning (if there is ONE) to mark & lock this article's classification. Since you cannot prove otherwise by providing "quote 'reputable footnote'" it should be deleted - "Its very simple" in your own words. Oh BTW I google'd/bing'd & ask'd "Matthew Vanitas" and the result was four letter word starts with an <B>"S"</B> followed by <B>"H"</B> followed<B> "I"</B> and yes - YES you know this and you are RIGHT this <B> ONE TIME </B>, its ending with <B>"T"</B> - how true is that. Have a good day. [[User:Msreddy004|Msreddy004]] ([[User talk:Msreddy004|talk]]) 21:26, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

532247 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-18 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.140281820E09 +++$+++ For your efforts against vandalism, which are greatly appreciated.  With thanks.  --  +++$+++ For your efforts against vandalism, which are greatly appreciated.  With thanks.  -- [[User:Samir_grover|Samir]] ∙ <sup>[[User_talk:Samir_grover|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Samir_grover|C]]</sub>  [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] 08:57, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
532248 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532247 +++$+++ 532247 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.140314880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for this I appreciate it. Keep up the good work as well!.  +++$+++ :Thanks for this I appreciate it. Keep up the good work as well!. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 18:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

270105 +++$+++ Passportguy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-19 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.242780060E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}<\/code> to '''the top of [[:Other9|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or \"db\" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Other9|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontext-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom -->  +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Other9|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Other9|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontext-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Passportguy|Passportguy]] ([[User talk:Passportguy|talk]]) 17:41, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270106 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270105 +++$+++ 270105 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.242780420E09 +++$+++ Moved to  +++$+++ : Moved to [[User:Mattisse/Other9]]. Hopefully problem solved? [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 17:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270107 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270105 +++$+++ 270106 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.242780600E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Gimmetrow! That was scary. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::Thank you, Gimmetrow! That was scary. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270108 +++$+++ Passportguy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270105 +++$+++ 270105 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.242781260E09 +++$+++ Not quite. In the meantime I had moved it to [[User talk:Mattisse\/Other9]] - but no harm done, you can alweays request deletion of the latter if there is no longer a need for it.  +++$+++ :Not quite. In the meantime I had moved it to [[User talk:Mattisse/Other9]] - but no harm done, you can alweays request deletion of the latter if there is no longer a need for it. [[User:Passportguy|Passportguy]] ([[User talk:Passportguy|talk]]) 18:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270109 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270105 +++$+++ 270108 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.242781740E09 +++$+++ I do not know how to access it if it is at [[User talk:Mattisse\/Other9]]. I have a link to [[User:Mattisse\/Other9]] on my user page, where I keep all my links to user pages. I am confused now.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::I do not know how to access it if it is at [[User talk:Mattisse/Other9]]. I have a link to [[User:Mattisse/Other9]] on my user page, where I keep all my links to user pages. I am confused now.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270110 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270105 +++$+++ 270109 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.242782520E09 +++$+++ Well, where do you want the page? It looks like you've settled on  +++$+++ ::: Well, where do you want the page? It looks like you've settled on [[User:Mattisse/other9]], which seems to have all the info you wrote. Would you like the two older pages deleted? [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 18:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270111 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270105 +++$+++ 270110 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.242782940E09 +++$+++ Yes, I copied it to [[User:Mattisse\/Other9]] which is what I meant to do in the first place. However, the {{tl|db-author}} doesn't seem to work any more on the old page, but I would like it deleted. Thanks.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Yes, I copied it to [[User:Mattisse/Other9]] which is what I meant to do in the first place. However, the {{tl|db-author}} doesn't seem to work any more on the old page, but I would like it deleted. Thanks.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:29, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270112 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270105 +++$+++ 270111 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.242783300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::: [[User:Mattisse/other9]] fits the pattern of your subpages. Everything else should be a red link now. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 18:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270113 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270105 +++$+++ 270112 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.242784140E09 +++$+++ Great. Thanks! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::Great. Thanks! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

7963 +++$+++ MatthewVanitas +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7963 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.311975360E09 +++$+++ In any case, Reddy-centric SPA that does pretty much nothing but mess with pages and insult people. Thanks for your consideration. I did delete a few of his posts, but only because they were blatant trolling\/attacks and would in no way lead to positive discourse, so thought it best to remove the bait from the equation.  +++$+++ In any case, Reddy-centric SPA that does pretty much nothing but mess with pages and insult people. Thanks for your consideration. I did delete a few of his posts, but only because they were blatant trolling/attacks and would in no way lead to positive discourse, so thought it best to remove the bait from the equation. [[User:MatthewVanitas|MatthewVanitas]] ([[User talk:MatthewVanitas|talk]]) 14:36, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
7964 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7963 +++$+++ 7963 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.311979380E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'll have a look at this as soon as I get a chance, but it's unlikely to be today now, I'm afraid --  +++$+++ :Hi, I'll have a look at this as soon as I get a chance, but it's unlikely to be today now, I'm afraid -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 15:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
7965 +++$+++ Jasper Deng +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7963 +++$+++ 7963 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.312022220E09 +++$+++ {{tps}}It's a bigger undertaking than that. See [[WP:ADMIN]] - clearly something that you aren't even close to at the moment. +++$+++ :{{tps}}It's a bigger undertaking than that. See [[WP:ADMIN]] - clearly something that you aren't even close to at the moment.[[User:Jasper Deng|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng|(talk)]] 03:37, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
7966 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7963 +++$+++ 7965 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 08:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312038660E09 +++$+++ And, erm, you can't be an admin until at least after you've actually registered an account --  +++$+++ ::And, erm, you can't be an admin until at least after you've actually registered an account -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 08:11, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
7967 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7963 +++$+++ 7963 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.312122900E09 +++$+++ Hi. I don't actually see any further personal attacks since the block expired - just content changes, which I presume are disputed. And I'm afraid I can't judge content here - you'd be best discussing content changes on the relevant Talk pages, or perhaps consulting an appropriate project Talk page. --  +++$+++ :Hi. I don't actually see any further personal attacks since the block expired - just content changes, which I presume are disputed. And I'm afraid I can't judge content here - you'd be best discussing content changes on the relevant Talk pages, or perhaps consulting an appropriate project Talk page. -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 07:35, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

532253 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-19 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.140360720E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for the barnstar!  Appreciated.  --  +++$+++ Many thanks for the barnstar!  Appreciated.  -- [[User:Samir_grover|Samir]] ∙ <sup>[[User_talk:Samir_grover|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Samir_grover|C]]</sub>  [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] 06:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
532254 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532253 +++$+++ 532253 +++$+++ 2006-02-19 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.140360780E09 +++$+++ Your welcome. You deserve it.  +++$+++ :Your welcome. You deserve it. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 06:53, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
532255 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532253 +++$+++ 532253 +++$+++ 2006-02-19 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.140362280E09 +++$+++ You may feel that the article is poorly written But you can help make it better. However, rather than blanking it or removing huge sections of it you should express your thoughts on how it can be improved on the article's talk page. That would be far more productive. Thanks.  +++$+++ :You may feel that the article is poorly written But you can help make it better. However, rather than blanking it or removing huge sections of it you should express your thoughts on how it can be improved on the article's talk page. That would be far more productive. Thanks. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 07:18, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
532256 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532253 +++$+++ 532253 +++$+++ 2006-02-19 07:22:00 +++$+++ 1.140362520E09 +++$+++ Ok, I understand. That is a common problem with a lot of what is called \"vandalism.\" Be patient with the editor. Also, I would reccomend that you consider getting an account.  +++$+++ :Ok, I understand. That is a common problem with a lot of what is called "vandalism." Be patient with the editor. Also, I would reccomend that you consider getting an account. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 07:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
532257 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532253 +++$+++ 532253 +++$+++ 2006-02-19 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.140363000E09 +++$+++ Well then why don't you press the button to request a new password be sent to your e-mail address. Also, can you please sign your comments like this on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;~~). Of course if you forgot your user name though that's a whole different problem. I suggest creating a new account. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Well then why don't you press the button to request a new password be sent to your e-mail address. Also, can you please sign your comments like this on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;~~). Of course if you forgot your user name though that's a whole different problem. I suggest creating a new account. Thanks. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 07:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

7968 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7968 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312156200E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#How_to_deal_with_tendentious_editing.3F]]. You are not named: this is just so you know, given your heavy involvement. -  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#How_to_deal_with_tendentious_editing.3F]]. You are not named: this is just so you know, given your heavy involvement. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 16:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
7969 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7968 +++$+++ 7968 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.312157520E09 +++$+++ Thanks - having a busy weekend, but I'll pop over and offer what I can asap --  +++$+++ :Thanks - having a busy weekend, but I'll pop over and offer what I can asap -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 17:12, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
7970 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7968 +++$+++ 7969 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312166460E09 +++$+++ Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.   <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. - moved from [[WP:AN]] per request of Fowler&fowler. -  +++$+++ ::Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.   <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. - moved from [[WP:AN]] per request of Fowler&fowler. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 19:41, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

270114 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270114 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-20 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.242887580E09 +++$+++ By the way, if you come across any other problems I might be able to help with, just let me know.  +++$+++ By the way, if you come across any other problems I might be able to help with, just let me know. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 23:33, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
270115 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270114 +++$+++ 270114 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.242888180E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I will. Much of the technical stuff like templates and transclusion and various codes is still a mystery to me.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks. I will. Much of the technical stuff like templates and transclusion and various codes is still a mystery to me.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

7971 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.312291140E09 +++$+++ Personally, I do not have a problem with Harvardnb but I know that a lot of people do not like it, a lot do not know that it exists, and if changing like this then one might as well go the whole hog and use the citeshort format so beloved at [[WP:FAC]] (& which I use if starting a new article). I could ask F&f direct but am not sure of my ground here<\/s>. -  +++$+++ Personally, I do not have a problem with Harvardnb but I know that a lot of people do not like it, a lot do not know that it exists, and if changing like this then one might as well go the whole hog and use the citeshort format so beloved at [[WP:FAC]] (& which I use if starting a new article). I could ask F&f direct but am not sure of my ground here</s>. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 06:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
7972 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7971 +++$+++ 7971 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.312292220E09 +++$+++ I am now sure of my ground - Qwyrxian has in fact made exactly the points that I would have made. -  +++$+++ :I am now sure of my ground - Qwyrxian has in fact made exactly the points that I would have made. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 06:37, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
7973 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ 7971 +++$+++ 7971 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312397640E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'm afraid I can only take a neutral point of view, as required by [[WP:NPOV]], and in my capacity as an admin on these articles I cannot offer opinions on the content or validity of actual sources - all I can do is help judge whether policies are being followed or not. Please be aware that Wikipedia only documents what reliable sources say, does not change articles to avoid hurting people's sentiments, and does not engage in any [[WP:OR|original research]] or [[WP:SYNTH|synthesis]] - which means we cannot make our own new deductions based on combinations of different sources. All of this has been explained many times on the various caste article Talk pages, and if you believe that the people currently working on those articles have not done much research, then you are very much mistaken - as far as I can see, they have researched many books, and have explained their research. You really should read those Talk pages, and their archives, and avoid repeating the same old same old arguments that have been raised before, and you really should revise your claims that editors have not done their research. However, if you now believe you have reliable sources that nobody has managed to uncover so far, which are better than those already presented, then please present them at the relevant article Talk page and try to gain a consensus to support the changes you wish to make - I will not myself take part in the actual content discussion --  +++$+++ :Hi. I'm afraid I can only take a neutral point of view, as required by [[WP:NPOV]], and in my capacity as an admin on these articles I cannot offer opinions on the content or validity of actual sources - all I can do is help judge whether policies are being followed or not. Please be aware that Wikipedia only documents what reliable sources say, does not change articles to avoid hurting people's sentiments, and does not engage in any [[WP:OR|original research]] or [[WP:SYNTH|synthesis]] - which means we cannot make our own new deductions based on combinations of different sources. All of this has been explained many times on the various caste article Talk pages, and if you believe that the people currently working on those articles have not done much research, then you are very much mistaken - as far as I can see, they have researched many books, and have explained their research. You really should read those Talk pages, and their archives, and avoid repeating the same old same old arguments that have been raised before, and you really should revise your claims that editors have not done their research. However, if you now believe you have reliable sources that nobody has managed to uncover so far, which are better than those already presented, then please present them at the relevant article Talk page and try to gain a consensus to support the changes you wish to make - I will not myself take part in the actual content discussion -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 11:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

270116 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-20 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.242861420E09 +++$+++ Sorry for not being able to do anything on Sunday through Tuesday. There was a funeral to deal with, as well as a rather incredible number of relatives coming in. Did I mention that I have something like twenty aunts and uncles, and they all seem to have bred like rabbits? The accompanying legal matters were I think largely resolved yesterday, although there might be need for additional information tomorrow.  +++$+++ Sorry for not being able to do anything on Sunday through Tuesday. There was a funeral to deal with, as well as a rather incredible number of relatives coming in. Did I mention that I have something like twenty aunts and uncles, and they all seem to have bred like rabbits? The accompanying legal matters were I think largely resolved yesterday, although there might be need for additional information tomorrow. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 16:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
270117 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270116 +++$+++ 270116 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.242862080E09 +++$+++ I am so glad you are back! When my mother died, my whole family moved into the house and we were all immobilized for a week, talking.  I was prepared for you to be away for a longer time. Hope I haven't messed up while you were gone, as I posted evidence. Tell me what you think. I don't know what arbitration rules are, but perhaps I can remove evidence if you think what I put there is inappropriate. I tried to address Durova's concerns, but frankly, some of them are over my head. If you explain them to me I will try to address them.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I am so glad you are back! When my mother died, my whole family moved into the house and we were all immobilized for a week, talking.  I was prepared for you to be away for a longer time. Hope I haven't messed up while you were gone, as I posted evidence. Tell me what you think. I don't know what arbitration rules are, but perhaps I can remove evidence if you think what I put there is inappropriate. I tried to address Durova's concerns, but frankly, some of them are over my head. If you explain them to me I will try to address them.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:28, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
270118 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270116 +++$+++ 270117 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.242863820E09 +++$+++ Anyone is free to change the nature of the evidence they present at any time. If you could provide a link to the comments from Durova you find difficult, and perhaps an indication of which e-mail comments you want retrieved, I can do so. It will be a bit harder going through what's left of your e-mail with your new additions, though. I should still be able to finish by the end of the day however.  +++$+++ ::Anyone is free to change the nature of the evidence they present at any time. If you could provide a link to the comments from Durova you find difficult, and perhaps an indication of which e-mail comments you want retrieved, I can do so. It will be a bit harder going through what's left of your e-mail with your new additions, though. I should still be able to finish by the end of the day however. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 16:57, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
270119 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270116 +++$+++ 270118 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.242865380E09 +++$+++ As far as the emails, if there is any evidence in them that I did not present that would be useful. For example, I thought I gave more of an analysis of Durova's comments, but what I gave may not be useful. I do not understand her accusations that I subtle vandalize, her accusations that I knew about her history over the last year or more, that I knew about her arbitrations, about her relationship with Giano and her mentoring relationship with Cirt. And I am not sure what difference she expected my knowledge of those things would make. I knew that she was involved in photography, providing featured pictures, but that is about it. Could you give me a brief summary of what in her history she is referring to and what I should know?  &mdash; +++$+++ :::As far as the emails, if there is any evidence in them that I did not present that would be useful. For example, I thought I gave more of an analysis of Durova's comments, but what I gave may not be useful. I do not understand her accusations that I subtle vandalize, her accusations that I knew about her history over the last year or more, that I knew about her arbitrations, about her relationship with Giano and her mentoring relationship with Cirt. And I am not sure what difference she expected my knowledge of those things would make. I knew that she was involved in photography, providing featured pictures, but that is about it. Could you give me a brief summary of what in her history she is referring to and what I should know?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
270120 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270116 +++$+++ 270119 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.242866160E09 +++$+++ I'm going through your e-mails to me as we speak, actually. Regarding where Durova gets her assumptions about what you know of her, I have no idea. I assume, possibly mistakenly, that she thinks I or someone else communicated that information to you through e-mails, or perhaps that such knowledge might be the reason for you not taking her up on her various offers.  +++$+++ ::::I'm going through your e-mails to me as we speak, actually. Regarding where Durova gets her assumptions about what you know of her, I have no idea. I assume, possibly mistakenly, that she thinks I or someone else communicated that information to you through e-mails, or perhaps that such knowledge might be the reason for you not taking her up on her various offers. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 17:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
270121 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270116 +++$+++ 270120 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.242872820E09 +++$+++ I reviewed the e-mails you sent me since the last ones I reviewed before I left, and you seem to have covered most all of the information already. Some slight details might be lacking in a few cases, but those details are probably not the primary points in any event.  +++$+++ :::::I reviewed the e-mails you sent me since the last ones I reviewed before I left, and you seem to have covered most all of the information already. Some slight details might be lacking in a few cases, but those details are probably not the primary points in any event. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 19:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
270122 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270116 +++$+++ 270121 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.242873360E09 +++$+++ OK. Do you have any suggestions?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::OK. Do you have any suggestions?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
270123 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270116 +++$+++ 270122 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.242873960E09 +++$+++ Well, if you have any specific ideas as to how to resolve the current situation, or if you see any ideas you like or dislike on the workshop page, those would be about it. When the evidence is basically collected, all that really happens thereafter is discussion of the evidence and the final decision of the arbitrators.  +++$+++ :::::::Well, if you have any specific ideas as to how to resolve the current situation, or if you see any ideas you like or dislike on the workshop page, those would be about it. When the evidence is basically collected, all that really happens thereafter is discussion of the evidence and the final decision of the arbitrators. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 19:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

350854 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350854 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-17 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.261094280E09 +++$+++ You probably saw\/will see this linked at ANI but just in case please be advised there is a thread that concerns you [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#A question about new drawing downloads|here]]. \u2013<font face=\"verdana\" color=\"black\"> +++$+++ You probably saw/will see this linked at ANI but just in case please be advised there is a thread that concerns you [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#A question about new drawing downloads|here]]. –<font face="verdana" color="black">[[user:xeno|'''xeno''']]</font>[[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 15:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
350855 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ Rama +++$+++ 350854 +++$+++ 350854 +++$+++ 2009-12-18 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.261125000E09 +++$+++ FYI I initiated an RFC on the drawing\/illustration concept here: [[Wikipedia talk:Non-free content\/Archive 44#Does a drawing of a person, or the fact that one might be drawn, mean all non-free photos of people are thus replaceable?]]. Cheers, \u2013<font face=\"verdana\" color=\"black\"> +++$+++ :FYI I initiated an RFC on the drawing/illustration concept here: [[Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 44#Does a drawing of a person, or the fact that one might be drawn, mean all non-free photos of people are thus replaceable?]]. Cheers, –<font face="verdana" color="black">[[user:xeno|'''xeno''']]</font>[[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 00:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

532263 +++$+++ Dethomas +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-21 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.140535560E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. [[User:Dethomas|Dethomas]] 07:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
532264 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532263 +++$+++ 532263 +++$+++ 2006-02-21 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.140579120E09 +++$+++ Put up for deletion as OB.  +++$+++ :Put up for deletion as OB. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 19:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

532265 +++$+++ Dethomas +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532265 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-21 07:31:00 +++$+++ 1.140535860E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ Regards, [[User:Dethomas|Dethomas]] 07:31, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
532266 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532265 +++$+++ 532265 +++$+++ 2006-02-21 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.140579180E09 +++$+++ Tagged with source info.  +++$+++ :Tagged with source info. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 19:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

532267 +++$+++ Petros471 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-21 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.140579300E09 +++$+++ I was reverting vandalism, hence the rvv, but you got there first ;-) i.e. started my revert after you did you first one and the IP had vandalised again, but before you did your second one. You started and finished your second revert quicker than mine completed. There must have been minor difference in what version we reverted to, and for some reason it didn't edit conflict. Hope that makes sense- I wasn't trying to revert your actions, just some weirdness in the software and WP servers being slow for me again!  +++$+++ I was reverting vandalism, hence the rvv, but you got there first ;-) i.e. started my revert after you did you first one and the IP had vandalised again, but before you did your second one. You started and finished your second revert quicker than mine completed. There must have been minor difference in what version we reverted to, and for some reason it didn't edit conflict. Hope that makes sense- I wasn't trying to revert your actions, just some weirdness in the software and WP servers being slow for me again! [[User:Petros471|Petros471]] 19:35, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
532268 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532267 +++$+++ 532267 +++$+++ 2006-02-21 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.140579540E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I understand. I know you didn't revert my edits. I have done a similar thing myself where I have somehow reverted a revert due to the servers\/software so I had to revert my revert immediately. Also, just a note reverting vandalism is great but rvv may not be the most adequate of an edit summary it is always better to metion the people involved. No worries. Have a nice day!.  +++$+++ :Yeah, I understand. I know you didn't revert my edits. I have done a similar thing myself where I have somehow reverted a revert due to the servers/software so I had to revert my revert immediately. Also, just a note reverting vandalism is great but rvv may not be the most adequate of an edit summary it is always better to metion the people involved. No worries. Have a nice day!. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 19:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
532269 +++$+++ Petros471 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532267 +++$+++ 532268 +++$+++ 2006-02-22 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.140636960E09 +++$+++ I generally use rvv because it's the quickest. It's arguably more useful than the automated pop-ups edit summary, which mentions version number but not specific reason or people. Also I generally assume that rvv means revert to the last version by the previous editor before the vandal. I'll certainly try in more complicated reverts to mention in more detail who\/what I'm reverting from\/to, but in simple cases I'll probably stick with speed. Btw, do you use god-mode light or some other rollback script that does your revert summaries automatically?  +++$+++ ::I generally use rvv because it's the quickest. It's arguably more useful than the automated pop-ups edit summary, which mentions version number but not specific reason or people. Also I generally assume that rvv means revert to the last version by the previous editor before the vandal. I'll certainly try in more complicated reverts to mention in more detail who/what I'm reverting from/to, but in simple cases I'll probably stick with speed. Btw, do you use god-mode light or some other rollback script that does your revert summaries automatically? [[User:Petros471|Petros471]] 11:36, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

7980 +++$+++ BigDunc +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 7980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-10 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.228970700E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}<\/code> to '''the top of [[:William Ament|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or \"db\" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:William Ament|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-bio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <strong> +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:William Ament|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:William Ament|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-bio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <strong>[[User:BigDunc|<span style="font-family:Ariel Black;color:Green">BigDunc</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:BigDunc|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Orange">Talk</span></sup>]] 20:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
7981 +++$+++ BigDunc +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 7980 +++$+++ 7980 +++$+++ 2008-12-10 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.228971600E09 +++$+++ I have removed the speedy tag I added to give you more time to establish notability. <strong> +++$+++ :I have removed the speedy tag I added to give you more time to establish notability. <strong>[[User:BigDunc|<span style="font-family:Ariel Black;color:Green">BigDunc</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:BigDunc|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Orange">Talk</span></sup>]] 21:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

525618 +++$+++ CSDWarnBot +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-06 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.202344200E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information_icon.svg|left]]Hello, this is a message from [[User:CSDWarnBot|an automated bot]]. A tag has been placed on [[:Freund Publishing House]], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|[[User:{{{nominator}}}|{{{nominator}}}]]&nbsp;([[User talk:{{{nominator}}}|talk]]&nbsp;'''\xb7''' [[Special:Contributions\/{{{nominator}}}|contribs]]),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:Freund Publishing House]] seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]]. <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting [[:Freund Publishing House]], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}<\/nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. Feel free to contact the [[User:CSDWarnBot|bot operator]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&page={{urlencode:Freund Publishing House}} here]'''  +++$+++ [[Image:Information_icon.svg|left]]Hello, this is a message from [[User:CSDWarnBot|an automated bot]]. A tag has been placed on [[:Freund Publishing House]], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|[[User:{{{nominator}}}|{{{nominator}}}]]&nbsp;([[User talk:{{{nominator}}}|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{{nominator}}}|contribs]]),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:Freund Publishing House]] seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]]. <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting [[:Freund Publishing House]], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. Feel free to contact the [[User:CSDWarnBot|bot operator]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page={{urlencode:Freund Publishing House}} here]''' [[User:CSDWarnBot|CSDWarnBot]] ([[User talk:CSDWarnBot|talk]]) 16:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
525619 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525618 +++$+++ 525618 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.202870100E09 +++$+++ Thank you -- I have updated [[Template:ICDO]] accordingly. -- +++$+++ :Thank you -- I have updated [[Template:ICDO]] accordingly. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 18:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

270126 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-19 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.242766620E09 +++$+++ Keep calm - I suggest you should only comment when asked, and stick to what is requested, responding concisely and calmly (use your copyedting skills for your own benefit. I've already deconstructed (euphemism) one of the complaints against you and invited the Arbs to look for other cases where the complaints contain the seeds of their own destruction. - +++$+++ Keep calm - I suggest you should only comment when asked, and stick to what is requested, responding concisely and calmly (use your copyedting skills for your own benefit. I've already deconstructed (euphemism) one of the complaints against you and invited the Arbs to look for other cases where the complaints contain the seeds of their own destruction. -[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 13:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270127 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270126 +++$+++ 270126 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.242767040E09 +++$+++ I don't know what to do, as I have been warned by Arbs that if I did not respond, it would be worse for me. So I am confused and rudderless. Many of the complaints are old stuff from the last RFC, so I must reexplain all that again. As far as I can tell, no one has asked me a question that I can understand. Where are the questions? Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I don't know what to do, as I have been warned by Arbs that if I did not respond, it would be worse for me. So I am confused and rudderless. Many of the complaints are old stuff from the last RFC, so I must reexplain all that again. As far as I can tell, no one has asked me a question that I can understand. Where are the questions? Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270128 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270126 +++$+++ 270127 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.242767700E09 +++$+++ P.S. Please see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Workshop#Case_status] where I am told to present evidence. Carathor also told me that. I have not hear from John Carter since Saturday so I do not know what that status is on that. He told me he would present evidence starting Sunday, then he told me his mother died. I began to panic. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::P.S. Please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Workshop#Case_status] where I am told to present evidence. Carathor also told me that. I have not hear from John Carter since Saturday so I do not know what that status is on that. He told me he would present evidence starting Sunday, then he told me his mother died. I began to panic. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:15, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270129 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270126 +++$+++ 270128 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.242768000E09 +++$+++ I know you asked me not to post on your talk page again, and I apologise for now doing so, but I just wanted to support what Philcha said. There are a lot of people on your side and I'm sure quite a few like me who have declined to get involved in this case for whatever reason. I honestly believe that the last thing anyone wants is to drive you away, even if that's what it seems like to you right now. As Philcha said, you're good with words, so now's the time to exercise that skill to your own advantage; stay calm and dignified. I think John said that he would probably be away until Wednesday because of brother's death, so no need for panic over that. Anyway, I'm gone, I won't be bothering you here again. -- +++$+++ :::I know you asked me not to post on your talk page again, and I apologise for now doing so, but I just wanted to support what Philcha said. There are a lot of people on your side and I'm sure quite a few like me who have declined to get involved in this case for whatever reason. I honestly believe that the last thing anyone wants is to drive you away, even if that's what it seems like to you right now. As Philcha said, you're good with words, so now's the time to exercise that skill to your own advantage; stay calm and dignified. I think John said that he would probably be away until Wednesday because of brother's death, so no need for panic over that. Anyway, I'm gone, I won't be bothering you here again. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 14:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270130 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270126 +++$+++ 270128 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.242768300E09 +++$+++ They said you had to respond, but not how quickly. Copy the relevant stuff into a User page and edit there; leave for 24 hours; do a thorough GA review on it - another of your strengths you should use to your own advantage - ; fix it; leave another 24 hours; put on your [[Worzel Gummidge | GA reviewer head]] again and review the changes. -- +++$+++ :::They said you had to respond, but not how quickly. Copy the relevant stuff into a User page and edit there; leave for 24 hours; do a thorough GA review on it - another of your strengths you should use to your own advantage - ; fix it; leave another 24 hours; put on your [[Worzel Gummidge | GA reviewer head]] again and review the changes. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 14:25, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270131 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270126 +++$+++ 270130 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.242769020E09 +++$+++ I am not good with words when it comes to this kind of thing. I do not understand the mentality behind it. Thank you for your advice. I am done responding. If John Carter comes back, that will be great. However, after my mother died it was way more that one week before any of us were functional again, so I can't count on him. I am confused over the Arbitration and need help. I will stay out of it from now on, as it seems that you are both saying I am harming myself by responding. Thank you for notifying me. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I am not good with words when it comes to this kind of thing. I do not understand the mentality behind it. Thank you for your advice. I am done responding. If John Carter comes back, that will be great. However, after my mother died it was way more that one week before any of us were functional again, so I can't count on him. I am confused over the Arbitration and need help. I will stay out of it from now on, as it seems that you are both saying I am harming myself by responding. Thank you for notifying me. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270132 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270126 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.242769680E09 +++$+++ Don't over-react. Try taking my suggestion literally, but without actually posting the results. Then see if you think it works for you. My commnets were not a subtle hint, I don't do subtle. -- +++$+++ ::::::Don't over-react. Try taking my suggestion literally, but without actually posting the results. Then see if you think it works for you. My commnets were not a subtle hint, I don't do subtle. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 14:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270133 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270126 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.242770580E09 +++$+++ Well, I don't want to start a user page. I just can't make myself do that. I have said pretty much everything, except the stuff I emailed to John which I cannot figure out how to retrieve. Everything is either defending myself against charges that I already have in the last RFC or defending myself from intensely hostile new charges over that one Scientology article. The history of Cirt, Durova, Scientology, the mentorship, Durova's relationship with Giano II etc. I know nothing about. Whatever happens, happens. I hope John Carter comes back. It will be a while before I can think clearly again. Thank you for your advice. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::Well, I don't want to start a user page. I just can't make myself do that. I have said pretty much everything, except the stuff I emailed to John which I cannot figure out how to retrieve. Everything is either defending myself against charges that I already have in the last RFC or defending myself from intensely hostile new charges over that one Scientology article. The history of Cirt, Durova, Scientology, the mentorship, Durova's relationship with Giano II etc. I know nothing about. Whatever happens, happens. I hope John Carter comes back. It will be a while before I can think clearly again. Thank you for your advice. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
270134 +++$+++ Paine_Ellsworth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270126 +++$+++ 270127 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.243066920E09 +++$+++ You certainly have my best wishes, Mattisse.  Your overall excellent editing history speaks for itself.  If there's anything I can do from my humble position, please just ask.  &nbsp;<small> +++$+++ ::You certainly have my best wishes, Mattisse.  Your overall excellent editing history speaks for itself.  If there's anything I can do from my humble position, please just ask.  &nbsp;<small>[[User:Paine_Ellsworth|<font color="darkblue"><b><sup>.`</sup></b>^)&nbsp;</font>Paine]][[User_talk:Paine_Ellsworth|<sup>diss`cuss</sup>&nbsp;<font color="darkblue">(^<b><sup>`.</sup></b></font>]]</small>&nbsp; 01:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

532273 +++$+++ Polanco +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532273 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-21 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.140588720E09 +++$+++ Out of curiosity, what in the world are you going to do with this little...\"project?\" My needs more info, si vous plait.  +++$+++ Out of curiosity, what in the world are you going to do with this little..."project?" My needs more info, si vous plait. [[User:Polanco|Polanco]] 22:12, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
532274 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532273 +++$+++ 532273 +++$+++ 2006-02-21 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.140593280E09 +++$+++ Please do not discuss the project (meWiki) here. It is highly confidential at the moment. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Please do not discuss the project (meWiki) here. It is highly confidential at the moment. Thanks. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 23:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
532275 +++$+++ LuckyPanda +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532273 +++$+++ 532274 +++$+++ 2006-02-22 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.140612600E09 +++$+++ ZOMG CONFIDENTIALZ! SECRETZ!  +++$+++ ::ZOMG CONFIDENTIALZ! SECRETZ! [[User:LuckyPanda|LuckyPanda]] 04:50, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
532276 +++$+++ Polanco +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532273 +++$+++ 532275 +++$+++ 2006-02-22 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.140627540E09 +++$+++ QFT  +++$+++ :::QFT [[User:Polanco|Polanco]] 08:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

7987 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 7987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-11 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.229048880E09 +++$+++ I have other research interests that I should be pursuing, so I do not imagine I will put much more effort into this article for a little while. Another one of my methods is to let the article settle for a while, and allow me sufficient perspective to rigorously pare it down. I agree the Oberlin Band would be worth researching. +++$+++ I have other research interests that I should be pursuing, so I do not imagine I will put much more effort into this article for a little while. Another one of my methods is to let the article settle for a while, and allow me sufficient perspective to rigorously pare it down. I agree the Oberlin Band would be worth researching.[[User:Smjwalsh|smjwalsh]] ([[User talk:Smjwalsh#top|talk]]) 18:28, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
7988 +++$+++ CWH +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 7987 +++$+++ 7987 +++$+++ 2008-12-11 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.229048220E09 +++$+++ Apologies if I seem too forward.  +++$+++ :Apologies if I seem too forward. [[User:CWH|ch]] ([[User talk:CWH|talk]]) 18:17, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

270135 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270135 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-21 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.242960960E09 +++$+++ One of the arbitrators, Carcharoth, has requested input from various people regarding why there are such widely dissimilar opinions of you. In that request, he also requested comments from you yourself. The discussion can be found at [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Evidence#Differing opinions of Mattisse's conduct ]].  +++$+++ One of the arbitrators, Carcharoth, has requested input from various people regarding why there are such widely dissimilar opinions of you. In that request, he also requested comments from you yourself. The discussion can be found at [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Evidence#Differing opinions of Mattisse's conduct ]]. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 19:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
270136 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270135 +++$+++ 270135 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.242963720E09 +++$+++ I am fearful if I add my opinion, it will just stir up more negative comments. I believe you have done a good job of explaining how my \"past\" and the  excessive mentions of me, the \"Oh, no not Mattisse again\", has created an image that preceeds me and gives me a negative halo. I also like what [[User:WhatamIdoing]] said on that talk page today. I feel like I am in a double bind.  What do you think I should do? &mdash; +++$+++ :I am fearful if I add my opinion, it will just stir up more negative comments. I believe you have done a good job of explaining how my "past" and the  excessive mentions of me, the "Oh, no not Mattisse again", has created an image that preceeds me and gives me a negative halo. I also like what [[User:WhatamIdoing]] said on that talk page today. I feel like I am in a double bind.  What do you think I should do? &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
270137 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270135 +++$+++ 270136 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.242964680E09 +++$+++ The Arbitrator wants the material, so I'm guessing some sort of response would make sense. Exactly how detailed you would want to be is entirely your call. Were it me, I would probably put in a fairly short statement myself.  +++$+++ ::The Arbitrator wants the material, so I'm guessing some sort of response would make sense. Exactly how detailed you would want to be is entirely your call. Were it me, I would probably put in a fairly short statement myself. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 20:58, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
270138 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270135 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.242967440E09 +++$+++ I will think about doing that, Philcha. However, I believe that the result is that I would be accused of more bad faith. It would stir up more dust, ending up in me feeling worse, I fear. There is no way I can express myself that would not just bring a barrage of negative comments.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I will think about doing that, Philcha. However, I believe that the result is that I would be accused of more bad faith. It would stir up more dust, ending up in me feeling worse, I fear. There is no way I can express myself that would not just bring a barrage of negative comments.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
270139 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270135 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.242968160E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry to butt in, but as a suggestion, you could email your input to Carcharoth or to the Committee as a whole (arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org). That way you could express your perspective without stirring up a negative reaction from the peanut gallery (myself included, I suppose). ''' +++$+++ :::::I'm sorry to butt in, but as a suggestion, you could email your input to Carcharoth or to the Committee as a whole (arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org). That way you could express your perspective without stirring up a negative reaction from the peanut gallery (myself included, I suppose). '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 21:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
270140 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270135 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.242968520E09 +++$+++ (ec) I think Carcharoth asked a very helpful question of those who have interacted with you to provide background information, which can be responded to in a largely factual way. However his question \"And to Mattisse herself... can you explain why people have such differing opinions of your conduct?\" has no factual response. I do not think it is helpful to answer it, and in your position I would politely not comment. As I said to Philcha on my talk page recently, it is rarely a good idea to guess what are other editors' intentions and motivations. If you need to know their intentions, ask them. If you don't, forget about it. '' +++$+++ ::::::(ec) I think Carcharoth asked a very helpful question of those who have interacted with you to provide background information, which can be responded to in a largely factual way. However his question "And to Mattisse herself... can you explain why people have such differing opinions of your conduct?" has no factual response. I do not think it is helpful to answer it, and in your position I would politely not comment. As I said to Philcha on my talk page recently, it is rarely a good idea to guess what are other editors' intentions and motivations. If you need to know their intentions, ask them. If you don't, forget about it. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 22:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
270141 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270135 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.242969780E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Geometry guy. I agree. I can only speculate as to why.   &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::Thank you, Geometry guy. I agree. I can only speculate as to why.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
270142 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270135 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.242974580E09 +++$+++ People have differing opinions about all sorts of things, just the way it is. Not for us to speculate as to why. Or more specifically for you to offer any speculation. Geometry guy's quite right. -- +++$+++ ::::::::People have differing opinions about all sorts of things, just the way it is. Not for us to speculate as to why. Or more specifically for you to offer any speculation. Geometry guy's quite right. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
270143 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270135 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.242974820E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Malleus. I do value your judgment. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::Thanks, Malleus. I do value your judgment. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
270144 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270135 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.242975000E09 +++$+++ Geometry guy and I don't always agree, but when we do it's a copper-bottomed certainty that we're right. ;-) -- +++$+++ ::::::::::Geometry guy and I don't always agree, but when we do it's a copper-bottomed certainty that we're right. ;-) --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
270145 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270135 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.242975480E09 +++$+++ And almost all  of the time, you do agree. Gold-bottomed certainty.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::::And almost all  of the time, you do agree. Gold-bottomed certainty.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:58, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

532282 +++$+++ Chris Bradley +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532282 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-26 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.141016820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Chris Bradley|Chris Bradley]] 21:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
532283 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532282 +++$+++ 532282 +++$+++ 2006-02-27 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.141083420E09 +++$+++ Your welcome!  +++$+++ :Your welcome! [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 15:37, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

532284 +++$+++ KillerChihuahua +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532284 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-06 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.141700220E09 +++$+++ You may wish to consider using test1 through test4 instead of bv. Read [[User:Mindspillage\/admin#Blocking]] if you want a good explanation of why. Also, many admins will not block for one instance of vandalism, unless it is truly blatant (the types you have been warning against have been more of the silly or nonsense variety.) Just a few things to think about.  +++$+++ You may wish to consider using test1 through test4 instead of bv. Read [[User:Mindspillage/admin#Blocking]] if you want a good explanation of why. Also, many admins will not block for one instance of vandalism, unless it is truly blatant (the types you have been warning against have been more of the silly or nonsense variety.) Just a few things to think about. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup> 18:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
532285 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532284 +++$+++ 532284 +++$+++ 2006-03-07 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.141730340E09 +++$+++ If you look at my edits I do 9+ times out of 10 use the test warnings. Also, the blockings I requested on [[WP:AIV|AIV]] were not for a single act of vandalism. I have been here long enough to know that admins don't block one-time vandals, unless of course they have been blocked many times recently. Please check you facts before explaining to me again something I already understand and do. The reason some of my warnings jumped immediately to test 4 or bv was because of my review of that IPs previous recent acts of vandalism; often to the same article that had been reverted and left unwarned by other lazy RC patrollers. Thanks.  +++$+++ :If you look at my edits I do 9+ times out of 10 use the test warnings. Also, the blockings I requested on [[WP:AIV|AIV]] were not for a single act of vandalism. I have been here long enough to know that admins don't block one-time vandals, unless of course they have been blocked many times recently. Please check you facts before explaining to me again something I already understand and do. The reason some of my warnings jumped immediately to test 4 or bv was because of my review of that IPs previous recent acts of vandalism; often to the same article that had been reverted and left unwarned by other lazy RC patrollers. Thanks. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 03:19, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
532286 +++$+++ Arniep +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532284 +++$+++ 532285 +++$+++ 2006-03-08 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.141858080E09 +++$+++ I think don't test1 was ever intended to be used for blatant vandalism <nowiki>{{subst:bv}}<\/nowiki>, deliberate adding of nonsense <nowiki>{{subst:test2}}<\/nowiki> or deliberate false information <nowiki>{{subst:verror2}}<\/nowiki>. Unfortunately in my opinion many people seem to have totally got the wrong end of the stick on what the purpose of [[WP:BITE]] was meant to be applied for. I don't think it was ever intended to indicate that we should use test templates inaccurately it was just meant to be applied where newbies do silly things like upload a bunch of images without tags or add well intended but badly formatted templates to articles. In those cases you I totally agree that we should not bite, but we should apply warning templates accurately to give other users a correct impression of what sort of edits the user has made previously.  +++$+++ ::I think don't test1 was ever intended to be used for blatant vandalism <nowiki>{{subst:bv}}</nowiki>, deliberate adding of nonsense <nowiki>{{subst:test2}}</nowiki> or deliberate false information <nowiki>{{subst:verror2}}</nowiki>. Unfortunately in my opinion many people seem to have totally got the wrong end of the stick on what the purpose of [[WP:BITE]] was meant to be applied for. I don't think it was ever intended to indicate that we should use test templates inaccurately it was just meant to be applied where newbies do silly things like upload a bunch of images without tags or add well intended but badly formatted templates to articles. In those cases you I totally agree that we should not bite, but we should apply warning templates accurately to give other users a correct impression of what sort of edits the user has made previously. [[User:Arniep|Arniep]] 14:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
532287 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532284 +++$+++ 532286 +++$+++ 2006-03-08 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.141859040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your thoughts on the whole test warning system. As warning for vandalism is subjective this leads to inconsistencies and disagreements. Have a nice day!  +++$+++ :::Thanks for your thoughts on the whole test warning system. As warning for vandalism is subjective this leads to inconsistencies and disagreements. Have a nice day! [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 15:04, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
532288 +++$+++ Arniep +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532284 +++$+++ 532287 +++$+++ 2006-03-08 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.141859580E09 +++$+++ That is exactly right. Not only that but I frequently check to see if people post a warning after reverting vandalism and unfortunately numerous times they don't post any warning at all, effectively making a nonsense of the whole test template system and allowing a lot more vandalism to occur before the user gets blocked (if ever).  +++$+++ ::::That is exactly right. Not only that but I frequently check to see if people post a warning after reverting vandalism and unfortunately numerous times they don't post any warning at all, effectively making a nonsense of the whole test template system and allowing a lot more vandalism to occur before the user gets blocked (if ever). [[User:Arniep|Arniep]] 15:13, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
532289 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532284 +++$+++ 532288 +++$+++ 2006-03-08 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.141859820E09 +++$+++ That's very true. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :::::That's very true. Thanks again. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 15:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

525621 +++$+++ A.Spotted.Owl +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.202913420E09 +++$+++ I rather hope you specialize in Neuropsychiatry (or Psychoneurology).   My niece has wanted to be a psychiatrist since she was in 6th grade and is now nearly in her senior year and still just as anxious.  I keep sending her articles in psych-related neurology (and primatology), wanting her to keep her enthusiasm up by recognizing what an exciting growing field she is entering.  She will have tools and knowledge that my psychiatrist husband never had.   Back then, they were taught that children could not be depressed - that only older adolescents and adults were capable of depression.   (and you should of seen the look on his face when I told him that my mother's dog was severely depressed after her dog companion was killed *laughing*)   +++$+++ I rather hope you specialize in Neuropsychiatry (or Psychoneurology).   My niece has wanted to be a psychiatrist since she was in 6th grade and is now nearly in her senior year and still just as anxious.  I keep sending her articles in psych-related neurology (and primatology), wanting her to keep her enthusiasm up by recognizing what an exciting growing field she is entering.  She will have tools and knowledge that my psychiatrist husband never had.   Back then, they were taught that children could not be depressed - that only older adolescents and adults were capable of depression.   (and you should of seen the look on his face when I told him that my mother's dog was severely depressed after her dog companion was killed *laughing*)  [[User:A.Spotted.Owl|Spotted Owl]] ([[User talk:A.Spotted.Owl|talk]]) 06:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
525622 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525621 +++$+++ 525621 +++$+++ 2008-02-29 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.204336080E09 +++$+++ Sorry -- I did some hunting, but couldn't find much on this condition that wasn't already in the article. -- +++$+++ :Sorry -- I did some hunting, but couldn't find much on this condition that wasn't already in the article. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 17:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

45024 +++$+++ Eddaido +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ 45024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-15 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.297774320E09 +++$+++ Urgent, I need help from a historically-minded city-editor interested in cars. I have just added a large section to [[Jowett]] because I was browsing something like 1400 images in Commons and was distracted by a Javelin with which I was at one time very intimate. I have probably unwisely added the original-finish image and then mentally noted the inadequacy of the description of the business's downfall. I have doubtless overdone it with my addition. I am glad to be a long way from Yorkshire if Idle, but I just might live near a Yorkshireman who is about to become inflamed by my efforts. Your experienced modification-to-suit of my Bold attempt is anxiously requested.  +++$+++ Urgent, I need help from a historically-minded city-editor interested in cars. I have just added a large section to [[Jowett]] because I was browsing something like 1400 images in Commons and was distracted by a Javelin with which I was at one time very intimate. I have probably unwisely added the original-finish image and then mentally noted the inadequacy of the description of the business's downfall. I have doubtless overdone it with my addition. I am glad to be a long way from Yorkshire if Idle, but I just might live near a Yorkshireman who is about to become inflamed by my efforts. Your experienced modification-to-suit of my Bold attempt is anxiously requested. [[User:Eddaido|Eddaido]] ([[User talk:Eddaido|talk]]) 04:52, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
45025 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ 45024 +++$+++ 45024 +++$+++ 2011-02-15 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.297782720E09 +++$+++ Well, I've duly savaged the opening para.   But I stress that part of what I've done is simply to replace your style with mine.   If you don't like it, feel free to improve on my efforts or to reverse them completely.   I'll resist the temptation to do anything more till I've seen your reaction to what I just did...   Regards    +++$+++ :Well, I've duly savaged the opening para.   But I stress that part of what I've done is simply to replace your style with mine.   If you don't like it, feel free to improve on my efforts or to reverse them completely.   I'll resist the temptation to do anything more till I've seen your reaction to what I just did...   Regards   [[User:Charles01|Charles01]] ([[User talk:Charles01#top|talk]]) 07:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
45026 +++$+++ Eddaido +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ 45024 +++$+++ 45025 +++$+++ 2011-02-15 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.297788180E09 +++$+++ You did that (first bit) very nicely indeed thank you, and on top of that you rise early. I went in to tackle my too variable tenses and found you had been at it just as I updated. Miraculously without a crash\/clash. I'm concerned that most of the article is now about the, let's face it, rather silly end of the business. I could revise and improve but I'd have to leave it alone for many months before it would come naturally and so read better, right now I would just hack at it. Please do as much as you feel you can. Even if that's no more, thank you very much and too for the sound advice  +++$+++ ::You did that (first bit) very nicely indeed thank you, and on top of that you rise early. I went in to tackle my too variable tenses and found you had been at it just as I updated. Miraculously without a crash/clash. I'm concerned that most of the article is now about the, let's face it, rather silly end of the business. I could revise and improve but I'd have to leave it alone for many months before it would come naturally and so read better, right now I would just hack at it. Please do as much as you feel you can. Even if that's no more, thank you very much and too for the sound advice [[User:Eddaido|Eddaido]] ([[User talk:Eddaido|talk]]) 08:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
45027 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ 45024 +++$+++ 45026 +++$+++ 2011-02-15 09:25:00 +++$+++ 1.297790700E09 +++$+++ Anyhow, I have a long wiki-todo list (as who does not?) but this subject is indeed something that interests me and my intention is to come back to it.   Best wishes  +++$+++ :::Anyhow, I have a long wiki-todo list (as who does not?) but this subject is indeed something that interests me and my intention is to come back to it.   Best wishes [[User:Charles01|Charles01]] ([[User talk:Charles01#top|talk]]) 09:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

532290 +++$+++ KillerChihuahua +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532290 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-09 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.141892220E09 +++$+++ I'm very sorry you were dragged into this, Dustimagic - you seem like a very nice person, and had I known you would be receiving so much attention concerning this I would have refrained from commenting on your page. One small caveat: be aware that biting newbies is a serious issue, be aware that Arniep is speaking only for himself, and be aware that not very many people support his revision of the policies.  +++$+++ I'm very sorry you were dragged into this, Dustimagic - you seem like a very nice person, and had I known you would be receiving so much attention concerning this I would have refrained from commenting on your page. One small caveat: be aware that biting newbies is a serious issue, be aware that Arniep is speaking only for himself, and be aware that not very many people support his revision of the policies. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup> 00:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
532291 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532290 +++$+++ 532290 +++$+++ 2006-03-09 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.141896300E09 +++$+++ Ok, I agree the warned many times thing was incorrect. I was using a copy and paste AIV vandal addition notice that I have used before when it is true; however, that is no excuse. My personal opinions on the whole vandal warning issue lie in the middle of don't biting the newbies and bv warnings. I think after a couple of \"tests\" the person is obviously a vandal because otherwhise they would have gone to the sndbox or stopped all together. Inconsistencies as far as block times and warnings lead to confusion and disinterest from anons. I wasn't really being badgered, but thanks for apologizing anyway. I appreciate your thoughts. I think the bv I added might have been in mistake as I believe I was warning multiple users around the same time and might have copied and pasted the wrong template. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and I would like to wish you best of luck on Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :Ok, I agree the warned many times thing was incorrect. I was using a copy and paste AIV vandal addition notice that I have used before when it is true; however, that is no excuse. My personal opinions on the whole vandal warning issue lie in the middle of don't biting the newbies and bv warnings. I think after a couple of "tests" the person is obviously a vandal because otherwhise they would have gone to the sndbox or stopped all together. Inconsistencies as far as block times and warnings lead to confusion and disinterest from anons. I wasn't really being badgered, but thanks for apologizing anyway. I appreciate your thoughts. I think the bv I added might have been in mistake as I believe I was warning multiple users around the same time and might have copied and pasted the wrong template. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and I would like to wish you best of luck on Wikipedia. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 01:25, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

8003 +++$+++ Arverniking +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8003 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-23 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.248345540E09 +++$+++ Hey, I noticed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Church_of_the_Nazarene&diff=303667769&oldid=303662242 this]. Seems we reverted different bits at the same time. :-) With regards to your edit summary, I'd agree but also say that it simply wasn't necessary to remove the infobox parameter, especially without explanation. It's not as if the article is overly long. Cheers! -- +++$+++ Hey, I noticed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Church_of_the_Nazarene&diff=303667769&oldid=303662242 this]. Seems we reverted different bits at the same time. :-) With regards to your edit summary, I'd agree but also say that it simply wasn't necessary to remove the infobox parameter, especially without explanation. It's not as if the article is overly long. Cheers! --[[User:Arverniking|King of the Arverni]] ([[User talk:Arverniking|talk]]) 03:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
8004 +++$+++ Arverniking +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8003 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.248349080E09 +++$+++ You didn't; you re-added it (from what I saw), as you should have. I was commending you. Well done. (-: -- +++$+++ ::You didn't; you re-added it (from what I saw), as you should have. I was commending you. Well done. (-: --[[User:Arverniking|King of the Arverni]] ([[User talk:Arverniking|talk]]) 04:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
8005 +++$+++ Arverniking +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8003 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.248387960E09 +++$+++ Yes, I'm not sure why they felt such a need to delete the parameter in the first place, which is why I re-added it. Thanks again! -- +++$+++ ::::Yes, I'm not sure why they felt such a need to delete the parameter in the first place, which is why I re-added it. Thanks again! --[[User:Arverniking|King of the Arverni]] ([[User talk:Arverniking|talk]]) 15:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

532293 +++$+++ Lightishdark +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-20 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.142863080E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Lightishdark|Lightishdark]] 05:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
532294 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532293 +++$+++ 532293 +++$+++ 2006-03-20 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.142863320E09 +++$+++ Could you give me the specifics on where the image is loacted\/where you got it like a link or something. Some kind of description would help me be able to help you. Thanks for asking.  +++$+++ :Could you give me the specifics on where the image is loacted/where you got it like a link or something. Some kind of description would help me be able to help you. Thanks for asking. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 06:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
532295 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532293 +++$+++ 532294 +++$+++ 2006-03-20 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.142863800E09 +++$+++ I would recommend this tag <nowiki>: {{PD-art-US}}<\/nowiki> on the image page. See [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|image tags]] for further information on images. Also, be sure to put that link on the page where the image page. Thanks. I hope this helps.  +++$+++ ::I would recommend this tag <nowiki>: {{PD-art-US}}</nowiki> on the image page. See [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|image tags]] for further information on images. Also, be sure to put that link on the page where the image page. Thanks. I hope this helps. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 06:10, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
532296 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532293 +++$+++ 532294 +++$+++ 2006-03-20 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.142864280E09 +++$+++ How about going to [[enzyme]]? PLease sign your comments as mentioned in my welcome message to you.  +++$+++ ::How about going to [[enzyme]]? PLease sign your comments as mentioned in my welcome message to you. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 06:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

532297 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-21 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.142930640E09 +++$+++ Good luck!  I'm sure it will come through -- <font color=\"black\" face=\"Arial\"> +++$+++ Good luck!  I'm sure it will come through -- <font color="black" face="Arial">[[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|Samir]] </font>[[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]]<font face="Arial Narrow" color="#000000"> <small> [[User_talk:Samir_(The_Scope)|(the scope)]]</small></font> 00:44, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
532298 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532297 +++$+++ 532297 +++$+++ 2006-03-21 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.142931240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your support. I don't understand some of the oppose votes as many of those editors have voted support for users who have been here for equal or lesser time and had equal or less edits. My experience with voting on Wikipedia is that people tend to be like sheep early on and go for the vote they feel most comfortable given the previous votes. Nevertheless I recognize other's viewpoints on adminship etc. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your support. I don't understand some of the oppose votes as many of those editors have voted support for users who have been here for equal or lesser time and had equal or less edits. My experience with voting on Wikipedia is that people tend to be like sheep early on and go for the vote they feel most comfortable given the previous votes. Nevertheless I recognize other's viewpoints on adminship etc. Thanks again. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 00:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
532299 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532297 +++$+++ 532298 +++$+++ 2006-03-21 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.142932080E09 +++$+++ Don't sweat the naysayers.  I find a lot of users on Rfa have rather arbitrary requirements, and vote erratically (even the more experienced ones).  If the numbers trend as they are now, I think you'll be an admin for sure.  Cheers -- <font color=\"black\" face=\"Arial\"> +++$+++ ::Don't sweat the naysayers.  I find a lot of users on Rfa have rather arbitrary requirements, and vote erratically (even the more experienced ones).  If the numbers trend as they are now, I think you'll be an admin for sure.  Cheers -- <font color="black" face="Arial">[[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|Samir]] </font>[[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]]<font face="Arial Narrow" color="#000000"> <small> [[User_talk:Samir_(The_Scope)|(the scope)]]</small></font> 01:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

8012 +++$+++ Collect +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8012 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-02 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.265141340E09 +++$+++ Lots of neat stuff -- but far too long for just one article. Might you consider either breaking out smaller articles and wikilinking to them, or pruning some of the minutiae which are interesting enough, but not essential for the reader to know?   Thanks!  +++$+++ Lots of neat stuff -- but far too long for just one article. Might you consider either breaking out smaller articles and wikilinking to them, or pruning some of the minutiae which are interesting enough, but not essential for the reader to know?   Thanks! [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 12:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
8013 +++$+++ Collect +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8012 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.265142780E09 +++$+++ I would actually prefer you do the dividing - I tend to cut a bit -- and I would like to honor your understanding of what is, and is not, important.   This is not really an article where folks will pick apart the references, to be sure.  In order to keep all the history intact bewteen the new articles, you might ask an admin to make copies of the page with the new names - then edit each of them down, and wikilink the new names to the article you keep with this name?   Perhaops a short overview of its history and history since 1954 (\"modern history\"?), a broken-out \"history to 1954\" linked,  \"Notable Guests\" (losing the \"unconfirmed\" ones as not really adding a lot to the article?) and pruning the references a bit would work? Thanks!  +++$+++ ::I would actually prefer you do the dividing - I tend to cut a bit -- and I would like to honor your understanding of what is, and is not, important.   This is not really an article where folks will pick apart the references, to be sure.  In order to keep all the history intact bewteen the new articles, you might ask an admin to make copies of the page with the new names - then edit each of them down, and wikilink the new names to the article you keep with this name?   Perhaops a short overview of its history and history since 1954 ("modern history"?), a broken-out "history to 1954" linked,  "Notable Guests" (losing the "unconfirmed" ones as not really adding a lot to the article?) and pruning the references a bit would work? Thanks! [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 12:33, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
8014 +++$+++ Collect +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8012 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.265144040E09 +++$+++ Too heck with PR departments <g>.  Let's whip this too long article into shape, right?  +++$+++ ::Too heck with PR departments <g>.  Let's whip this too long article into shape, right? [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 12:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

532302 +++$+++ James.kendall +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-22 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.143068220E09 +++$+++ I hope that helps. Now you can enjoy welcoming and helping others! <i><font color=\"green\">[[User:James.kendall| James]]<\/font> <font color=\"purple\"> +++$+++ I hope that helps. Now you can enjoy welcoming and helping others! <i><font color="green">[[User:James.kendall| James]]</font> <font color="purple">[[User:James.kendall| Kendall]]</font></i> [[User_talk:James.kendall| [talk]]] 14:57, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
532303 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532302 +++$+++ 532302 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.143084240E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for yor help!  +++$+++ :Thanks a lot for yor help! [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 19:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

532304 +++$+++ Delta x +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-24 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.143263700E09 +++$+++ Hello Dustimagic. I Just wanted to drop by and say thank you for rolling out the welcome mat. I discovered Wikipedia several years ago, but it was'nt until just recently that I actually considered making contributions. So far, I have'nt hit any major snags. However, if and when I do, I'll be sure to send up a flare. Again, thanks.  +++$+++ Hello Dustimagic. I Just wanted to drop by and say thank you for rolling out the welcome mat. I discovered Wikipedia several years ago, but it was'nt until just recently that I actually considered making contributions. So far, I have'nt hit any major snags. However, if and when I do, I'll be sure to send up a flare. Again, thanks. [[User:Delta x|Delta x]] 21:15, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
532305 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532304 +++$+++ 532304 +++$+++ 2006-03-25 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.143274740E09 +++$+++ Great, thanks for the reply. Have a nice day!.  +++$+++ :Great, thanks for the reply. Have a nice day!. [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 00:19, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

8018 +++$+++ Walter Görlitz +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-30 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.272634920E09 +++$+++ I need to go to bed. Could you please stop editing the Stonehill section. I just lost nearly an hour of editing to two conflicts. I need to fix some issues with that section. Thanks. -- +++$+++ I need to go to bed. Could you please stop editing the Stonehill section. I just lost nearly an hour of editing to two conflicts. I need to fix some issues with that section. Thanks. --[[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 06:42, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
8019 +++$+++ Walter Görlitz +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8018 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-30 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.272636540E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'm done now. Fortunately I have some tools that allow me to merge changes together, albeit external to Wikipedia. I needed to clarify the differing points of view around the end of Randy's first marriage. Larry and his biographer seem to be at odds with the first-hand accounts in [[Fallen Angel]]. I really appreciate how you're fleshing-out the rest of the section. You're a very good and dedicated editor. Feel free to add whatever information you can to other Jesus music artists. -- +++$+++ :: Thanks. I'm done now. Fortunately I have some tools that allow me to merge changes together, albeit external to Wikipedia. I needed to clarify the differing points of view around the end of Randy's first marriage. Larry and his biographer seem to be at odds with the first-hand accounts in [[Fallen Angel]]. I really appreciate how you're fleshing-out the rest of the section. You're a very good and dedicated editor. Feel free to add whatever information you can to other Jesus music artists. --[[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 07:09, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

270163 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-23 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.243089180E09 +++$+++ I have nommed Wolters for TFA.  Would you mind going [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article\/requests here] and joining as a conominator?  Please.-- +++$+++ I have nommed Wolters for TFA.  Would you mind going [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article/requests here] and joining as a conominator?  Please.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 07:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
270164 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270163 +++$+++ 270163 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.243117860E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much, Wehwalt. It is very generous of you. I went there and registered a support. I hope I did it correctly.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you so much, Wehwalt. It is very generous of you. I went there and registered a support. I hope I did it correctly.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:31, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
270165 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270163 +++$+++ 270164 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.243128120E09 +++$+++ It's fine.  How are you doing?-- +++$+++ ::It's fine.  How are you doing?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 18:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
270166 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270163 +++$+++ 270165 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.243128660E09 +++$+++ Not very well. The suggestion from the Arbitrators so far is to ban me for 60 days. &mdash; +++$+++ :::Not very well. The suggestion from the Arbitrators so far is to ban me for 60 days. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:31, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
270167 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270163 +++$+++ 270166 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.243128780E09 +++$+++ I'll go take a look at it.  I can't see how that would help.-- +++$+++ ::::I'll go take a look at it.  I can't see how that would help.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 18:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
270168 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270163 +++$+++ 270167 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.243129920E09 +++$+++ I think the chorus of indignation, to which I have added my voice, speaks for itself on NYB's proposal.-- +++$+++ :::::I think the chorus of indignation, to which I have added my voice, speaks for itself on NYB's proposal.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 18:52, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

8021 +++$+++ Hulmem +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-23 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.272063120E09 +++$+++ I noticed you recently edited [[Little Anthony and the Imperials\u200e]], changing \"Little Anthony and the Imperials ''are'' a rhythm and blues\/soul\/doo-wop vocal group...\" to \"Little Anthony and the Imperials ''is'' a rhythm and blues\/soul\/doo-wop vocal group...\", with the edit summary \"Rules of English grammar require collective noun to have singular form of verb, therefore 'Is' not 'are')\".  I agree with you for American English, but British English (and most other variants of English) use the plural form of the verb with a collective noun.  So you will see that all non-U.S. band articles use ''are''.  However, you will see that most Wikipedia references to U.S. bands also use ''are'' (and other plural forms such as ''were'' and ''they'').  If you look at the edit histories of these articles, you may see multiple revisions changing back and forth between singular and plural forms.  So I think you are fighting a losing battle; don't be surprised if someone eventually reverts the edit and similar edits to other articles you may have made.  -- +++$+++ I noticed you recently edited [[Little Anthony and the Imperials‎]], changing "Little Anthony and the Imperials ''are'' a rhythm and blues/soul/doo-wop vocal group..." to "Little Anthony and the Imperials ''is'' a rhythm and blues/soul/doo-wop vocal group...", with the edit summary "Rules of English grammar require collective noun to have singular form of verb, therefore 'Is' not 'are')".  I agree with you for American English, but British English (and most other variants of English) use the plural form of the verb with a collective noun.  So you will see that all non-U.S. band articles use ''are''.  However, you will see that most Wikipedia references to U.S. bands also use ''are'' (and other plural forms such as ''were'' and ''they'').  If you look at the edit histories of these articles, you may see multiple revisions changing back and forth between singular and plural forms.  So I think you are fighting a losing battle; don't be surprised if someone eventually reverts the edit and similar edits to other articles you may have made.  --[[User:Hulmem|hulmem]] ([[User talk:Hulmem|talk]]) 15:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
8022 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8021 +++$+++ 8021 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.272063540E09 +++$+++ I came here to say something like that. The whole BrE\/AmE thing is a pain - I dunno why we can't just mix 'em all up...  +++$+++ :I came here to say something like that. The whole BrE/AmE thing is a pain - I dunno why we can't just mix 'em all up... [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe|talk]]) 15:59, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
8023 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8021 +++$+++ 8021 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.272066060E09 +++$+++ I know. Isn't it a frightful bore?  +++$+++ :I know. Isn't it a frightful bore? [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe|talk]]) 16:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
8024 +++$+++ Hulmem +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8021 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.272067080E09 +++$+++ I agree, and I've tried that ([[Beach Boys]], etc.) but someone invariably reverts the edit back to the plural form.  It just isn't important so I quickly gave up.  I guess I was trying to alert you that you have an uphill battle.  I think the root of the issue is that to many people, one way \"sounds\" right and the other way \"sounds\" wrong.  Based on an informal look at a number of articles, the empirical consensus seems to be to use the plural form, right or wrong.  -- +++$+++ :::I agree, and I've tried that ([[Beach Boys]], etc.) but someone invariably reverts the edit back to the plural form.  It just isn't important so I quickly gave up.  I guess I was trying to alert you that you have an uphill battle.  I think the root of the issue is that to many people, one way "sounds" right and the other way "sounds" wrong.  Based on an informal look at a number of articles, the empirical consensus seems to be to use the plural form, right or wrong.  --[[User:Hulmem|hulmem]] ([[User talk:Hulmem|talk]]) 16:58, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

532310 +++$+++ JoshuaZ +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-27 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.143462360E09 +++$+++ Congrats, and now will you kindly block {{vandal |203.166.99.239}}?   +++$+++ Congrats, and now will you kindly block {{vandal |203.166.99.239}}?  [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 04:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
532311 +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532310 +++$+++ 532310 +++$+++ 2006-03-27 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.143476340E09 +++$+++ Yes  +++$+++ :Yes [[User:Dustimagic| <font color="black">'''¡Dustimagic!'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 08:19, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
532312 +++$+++ Wezzo +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532310 +++$+++ 532310 +++$+++ 2006-03-27 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.143500280E09 +++$+++ Congratulations nfrom me too. Enjoy the mop and bucket! - '''[[User:Wezzo|W]][[User:Wezzo\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]][[User:Wezzo|zzo]]''' <small>[[User talk:Wezzo|(talk)]]  +++$+++ :Congratulations nfrom me too. Enjoy the mop and bucket! - '''[[User:Wezzo|W]][[User:Wezzo/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Wezzo|zzo]]''' <small>[[User talk:Wezzo|(talk)]] [[User:Wezzo/userboxes|(ubx)]]</small> 14:58, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
532313 +++$+++ gwernol +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532310 +++$+++ 532310 +++$+++ 2006-03-27 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.143503340E09 +++$+++ Just to add my congratulations, well done. You're going to do a great job. Best,  +++$+++ :Just to add my congratulations, well done. You're going to do a great job. Best, [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 15:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
532314 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532310 +++$+++ 532310 +++$+++ 2006-03-27 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.143508200E09 +++$+++ Congratulations Dustimagic.  Please let me know if I can ever be of assistance to you in your new role.  Best,  +++$+++ :Congratulations Dustimagic.  Please let me know if I can ever be of assistance to you in your new role.  Best, [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 17:10, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
532315 +++$+++ KillerChihuahua +++$+++ Dustimagic +++$+++ 532310 +++$+++ 532314 +++$+++ 2006-03-27 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.143517740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup> 19:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

485342 +++$+++ Thirdbeach +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 485342 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-13 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.223887440E09 +++$+++ Oops, Wknight94, I may have misinterpreted the contents of your table in the KillAllSpammers checkuser. For one thing, I interpreted it as a bot -- sorry to anti-anthropomorphize you! If your IP ranges matched mine and I just misunderstood the syntax, I definitely apologize and in any case am grateful for your help.  +++$+++ Oops, Wknight94, I may have misinterpreted the contents of your table in the KillAllSpammers checkuser. For one thing, I interpreted it as a bot -- sorry to anti-anthropomorphize you! If your IP ranges matched mine and I just misunderstood the syntax, I definitely apologize and in any case am grateful for your help. [[User:Thirdbeach|Thirdbeach]] ([[User talk:Thirdbeach|talk]]) 01:44, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
485343 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 485342 +++$+++ 485342 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.223887680E09 +++$+++ No problem.  My notations were [[CIDR]] and I was hoping a checkuser would find the links useful.  But I also don't want to give you cause for concern so I'll leave it to your discretion.  \u2014 +++$+++ :No problem.  My notations were [[CIDR]] and I was hoping a checkuser would find the links useful.  But I also don't want to give you cause for concern so I'll leave it to your discretion.  —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:Wknight94|talk]]) 01:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
485344 +++$+++ 63.229.62.199 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 485342 +++$+++ 485343 +++$+++ 2008-10-30 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.225431060E09 +++$+++ Ah, got it: CIDR. Twenty steps behind you but hope to close the gap someday :-). [[Special:Contributions\/63.229.62.199|63.229.62.199]] ( +++$+++ ::Ah, got it: CIDR. Twenty steps behind you but hope to close the gap someday :-). [[Special:Contributions/63.229.62.199|63.229.62.199]] ([[User talk:63.229.62.199|talk]]) 22:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
485345 +++$+++ Semitransgenic +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 485342 +++$+++ 485342 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.223919780E09 +++$+++ Despite a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets#User:Valueyou protracted dispute] with [[User:Valueyou|Valueyou]] leading to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Valueyou#Canvassing_inappropriate_articles_for_support intervention] of multiple editors, [[User:Valueyou|Valueyou]]'s immediate action, following the conclusion of this period of disruption, was to revert the disputed article to a condition that [[User:Valueyou|Valueyou]] deemed acceptable, therefore leaving outstanding issues with [[WP:OR]], [[WP:VER]], [[WP:SYN]], unaddressed. The dispute esentially relates to disagreement about tagging and to [[User:Semitransgenic|Semitransgenic]]'s request for citations. The origin of this dispute can be traced to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Noise_(music)#Additonal_uncited_material here]. The user engaged in [[WP:CANVASS]] by copy pasting a personal attack across the talk pages of multiple articles user [[User:Semitransgenic|Semitransgenic]] has edited. There is also evidence of [[User:Valueyou|Valueyou]] accusing [[User:Semitransgenic|Semitransgenic]] of anti-semitism, resulting in [[User:Valueyou|Valueyou]] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:%D7%91%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%99#Spiteful_Semitransgenic attempting to canvass] [[User:\u05d1\u05e8\u05d5\u05e7\u05d5\u05dc\u05d9|\u05d1\u05e8\u05d5\u05e7\u05d5\u05dc\u05d9]]. This last allegation arose as a result of the statement made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Valueyou#Noise_edits. here] at 17:42 on the 10th of August. Irrespective of the nature of this hostile campaign [[User:Semitransgenic|Semitransgenic]] attempted to arrive at a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Valueyou#Proposal truce] but [[User:Valueyou|Valueyou]]'s repsonse was instead to engage in antagonistic reversion. Please advise.  +++$+++ :Despite a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets#User:Valueyou protracted dispute] with [[User:Valueyou|Valueyou]] leading to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Valueyou#Canvassing_inappropriate_articles_for_support intervention] of multiple editors, [[User:Valueyou|Valueyou]]'s immediate action, following the conclusion of this period of disruption, was to revert the disputed article to a condition that [[User:Valueyou|Valueyou]] deemed acceptable, therefore leaving outstanding issues with [[WP:OR]], [[WP:VER]], [[WP:SYN]], unaddressed. The dispute esentially relates to disagreement about tagging and to [[User:Semitransgenic|Semitransgenic]]'s request for citations. The origin of this dispute can be traced to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Noise_(music)#Additonal_uncited_material here]. The user engaged in [[WP:CANVASS]] by copy pasting a personal attack across the talk pages of multiple articles user [[User:Semitransgenic|Semitransgenic]] has edited. There is also evidence of [[User:Valueyou|Valueyou]] accusing [[User:Semitransgenic|Semitransgenic]] of anti-semitism, resulting in [[User:Valueyou|Valueyou]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%D7%91%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%99#Spiteful_Semitransgenic attempting to canvass] [[User:ברוקולי|ברוקולי]]. This last allegation arose as a result of the statement made [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Valueyou#Noise_edits. here] at 17:42 on the 10th of August. Irrespective of the nature of this hostile campaign [[User:Semitransgenic|Semitransgenic]] attempted to arrive at a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Valueyou#Proposal truce] but [[User:Valueyou|Valueyou]]'s repsonse was instead to engage in antagonistic reversion. Please advise. [[User:Semitransgenic|Semitransgenic]] ([[User talk:Semitransgenic|talk]]) 10:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

8027 +++$+++ Walter Görlitz +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-08 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.275982920E09 +++$+++ Related to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Larry_Norman&curid=97205&diff=366681674&oldid=366581136 this edit], where's the new article? -- +++$+++ Related to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Larry_Norman&curid=97205&diff=366681674&oldid=366581136 this edit], where's the new article? --[[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 00:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
8028 +++$+++ Walter Görlitz +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8027 +++$+++ 8027 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.275983040E09 +++$+++ Just found [[Relationship of Larry Norman and Randy Stonehill|it]]. Perhaps a brief paragraph or two in the LN article with a main tag is appropriate. -- +++$+++ :Just found [[Relationship of Larry Norman and Randy Stonehill|it]]. Perhaps a brief paragraph or two in the LN article with a main tag is appropriate. --[[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 00:44, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

555523 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ 555523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-21 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.208821140E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates\/delist\/Hawaii_turtle nomination]. I asked you a question there and I'd like to bring your attention to this question please because I really would like to get an answer. Thanks.-- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/Hawaii_turtle nomination]. I asked you a question there and I'd like to bring your attention to this question please because I really would like to get an answer. Thanks.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 16:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
555524 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ 555523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-22 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.208855520E09 +++$+++ Because you've never responded my question let me please assume that you yourself do not know what you were talking about. May I please also mention that IMO Wikipedia is not a place for the ungrounded accusations? Thanks.-- +++$+++ :*Because you've never responded my question let me please assume that you yourself do not know what you were talking about. May I please also mention that IMO Wikipedia is not a place for the ungrounded accusations? Thanks.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 02:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
555525 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ 555523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-22 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.208856180E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the response. I do not think you understood me right. They all are mine pictures and I wish they all were featured. They all are different and IMO they all are interesting in their own way. I just did not want to nominate the second image to get an FP status because I was afraid that it would get opposed because we already have one FP of a green turtle.-- +++$+++ ::*Thank you for the response. I do not think you understood me right. They all are mine pictures and I wish they all were featured. They all are different and IMO they all are interesting in their own way. I just did not want to nominate the second image to get an FP status because I was afraid that it would get opposed because we already have one FP of a green turtle.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 02:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
555526 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ 555523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-22 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.208856600E09 +++$+++ Commons, yes, but what about English Wikipedia? I bet, if I am to nominate one of my recent images on English Wikipedia, it would probably get opposed because one turtle is already featured. I believe you saw it yourself. Few people voted to keep an old image, but none, but you, said why not to have a second one featured too.Thank you.-- +++$+++ :::*Commons, yes, but what about English Wikipedia? I bet, if I am to nominate one of my recent images on English Wikipedia, it would probably get opposed because one turtle is already featured. I believe you saw it yourself. Few people voted to keep an old image, but none, but you, said why not to have a second one featured too.Thank you.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 02:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

8029 +++$+++ Tuxhedoh +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8029 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-14 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.276565100E09 +++$+++ I'm interested in assisting in creating new articles to help weed this page down.  I don't have any stake in it, just saw somewhere I might be useful in growing my wiki-editing skills. So if you have suggestions of pages that can be culled out, let me know. I'll spend some time with the article later today and see if I can come up with something on my own. +++$+++ I'm interested in assisting in creating new articles to help weed this page down.  I don't have any stake in it, just saw somewhere I might be useful in growing my wiki-editing skills. So if you have suggestions of pages that can be culled out, let me know. I'll spend some time with the article later today and see if I can come up with something on my own.[[User:Tuxhedoh|Tuxhedoh]] ([[User talk:Tuxhedoh|talk]]) 18:25, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
8030 +++$+++ Tuxhedoh +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8029 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-14 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.276581480E09 +++$+++ Get back to me... that's fine. +++$+++ ::Get back to me... that's fine.[[User:Tuxhedoh|Tuxhedoh]] ([[User talk:Tuxhedoh|talk]]) 22:58, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

270175 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270175 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-30 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.243675740E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision#Mattisse_banned_conditionally Per this], if you cannot find someone to serve as a mentor or adviser in a way that satisfies the community, you can add me to the list. I know there are probably better candidates that have offered, but I would rather not see you get into a position where you are left without someone in the next 15 days. So, you can consider me a backup, a primary, whatever.  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision#Mattisse_banned_conditionally Per this], if you cannot find someone to serve as a mentor or adviser in a way that satisfies the community, you can add me to the list. I know there are probably better candidates that have offered, but I would rather not see you get into a position where you are left without someone in the next 15 days. So, you can consider me a backup, a primary, whatever. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 02:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
270176 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270175 +++$+++ 270175 +++$+++ 2009-05-30 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.243676100E09 +++$+++ Along the same lines as what OR just said, I almost certainly would suck as a mentor. I have a fairly long history of spending about half my time arguing with people (though I'm trying to cut down now, as per [[WP:DGAF]]). Please do not consider me as a primary candidate or anything. However, I could offer a second opinion on issues from time to time, if you like.  +++$+++ :Along the same lines as what OR just said, I almost certainly would suck as a mentor. I have a fairly long history of spending about half my time arguing with people (though I'm trying to cut down now, as per [[WP:DGAF]]). Please do not consider me as a primary candidate or anything. However, I could offer a second opinion on issues from time to time, if you like. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 02:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

270177 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-30 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.243676700E09 +++$+++ Seems to me like this ArbCom case may now at last be heading towards a reasonable settlement Mattisse, and I hope you feel the same way. I also hope that you take heart from the offers made by the two reprobates above. Frankly though, if I were in your shoes I wouldn't touch either of them with a very long barge pole, and I'd want an even longer one for me. :-) -- +++$+++ Seems to me like this ArbCom case may now at last be heading towards a reasonable settlement Mattisse, and I hope you feel the same way. I also hope that you take heart from the offers made by the two reprobates above. Frankly though, if I were in your shoes I wouldn't touch either of them with a very long barge pole, and I'd want an even longer one for me. :-) --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 02:45, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
270178 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270177 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.243799040E09 +++$+++ A list is a good first step, but what is needed, in my view, is a dedicated page (with an associated talk page) containing, among other things, clear statements, agreed by Mattisse and each editor offering to advise\/mentor, on what the relationship involves. '' +++$+++ ::A list is a good first step, but what is needed, in my view, is a dedicated page (with an associated talk page) containing, among other things, clear statements, agreed by Mattisse and each editor offering to advise/mentor, on what the relationship involves. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 12:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
270179 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270177 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.243799940E09 +++$+++ What's the process you have in mind, G-guy? The one I had in mind was: identify those involved; agree objectives (possibly multiple); brainstorm; draft procedures. At present I think one page will be needed for the design and another for handling specific cases. -- +++$+++ :::What's the process you have in mind, G-guy? The one I had in mind was: identify those involved; agree objectives (possibly multiple); brainstorm; draft procedures. At present I think one page will be needed for the design and another for handling specific cases. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 12:59, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
270180 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270177 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.243801380E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's pretty much the way forward I have in mind too. The place to do this drafting, in my view, is the dedicated page itself, and the place to brainstorm, discuss and agree objectives is the associated talk page. The question is, where should this page be, and what should it be called? '' +++$+++ ::::Yes, that's pretty much the way forward I have in mind too. The place to do this drafting, in my view, is the dedicated page itself, and the place to brainstorm, discuss and agree objectives is the associated talk page. The question is, where should this page be, and what should it be called? ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 13:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
270181 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270177 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.243800120E09 +++$+++ BTW the point of [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision#Users willing to act as advisers]] is to make it publicly clear that this approach has enough supporters to make it a runner. -- +++$+++ :::BTW the point of [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision#Users willing to act as advisers]] is to make it publicly clear that this approach has enough supporters to make it a runner. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 13:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
270182 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270177 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.243803960E09 +++$+++ I've raised at [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision#Where to put all this together?]] the question of where the plan should be designed and operated. -- +++$+++ :::I've raised at [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision#Where to put all this together?]] the question of where the plan should be designed and operated. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 14:06, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
270183 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270177 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.243804500E09 +++$+++ Several people (including me) volunteered before Philcha quite helpfully put up that thread. Do y'all plan to notify them of the new de facto signup spot?  +++$+++ ::::Several people (including me) volunteered before Philcha quite helpfully put up that thread. Do y'all plan to notify them of the new de facto signup spot? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 14:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
270184 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270177 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.243805760E09 +++$+++ If you're referring to those listed at this page, I was hoping they would have this on their watchlists and would sign up at [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision#Users willing to act as advisers]]. Fowler&fowler posted other suggestions at [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision#Users willing to act as advisers]], and I'm inclined to see whether \/ how they respond rather than push them. I think volunteers will do better than conscripts in this. -- +++$+++ :::::If you're referring to those listed at this page, I was hoping they would have this on their watchlists and would sign up at [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision#Users willing to act as advisers]]. Fowler&fowler posted other suggestions at [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision#Users willing to act as advisers]], and I'm inclined to see whether / how they respond rather than push them. I think volunteers will do better than conscripts in this. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 14:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
270185 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270177 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.243814520E09 +++$+++ Moni3 has kindly set up a [[User:Moni3\/Mattisse stewards arbcom| sandbox page]] where we can start working out the details. I suggest we discuss ideas at its Talk page first. -- +++$+++ ::Moni3 has kindly set up a [[User:Moni3/Mattisse stewards arbcom| sandbox page]] where we can start working out the details. I suggest we discuss ideas at its Talk page first. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 17:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

8035 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-02 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.278108060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 15:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
8036 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8035 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-02 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.278109020E09 +++$+++ Sorry but I don't see that the answer to the problem is to create articles on non-notable companies - if you need to reduce and summarise the section in the main article then do that but unless you can show [[Phydeaux Records]] meets [[WP:CORP]] then it should be redirected to [[Larry Norman]] as per [[WP:BEFORE]].  +++$+++ :: Sorry but I don't see that the answer to the problem is to create articles on non-notable companies - if you need to reduce and summarise the section in the main article then do that but unless you can show [[Phydeaux Records]] meets [[WP:CORP]] then it should be redirected to [[Larry Norman]] as per [[WP:BEFORE]]. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 15:17, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
8037 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8035 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-02 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.278110520E09 +++$+++ I think that is the issue - when you say \"secondary sources that reference Phydeaux\" - that does not meet [[WP:CORP]] - they need to cover Phydeaux, not just \"report\" on record releases.  +++$+++ :::: I think that is the issue - when you say "secondary sources that reference Phydeaux" - that does not meet [[WP:CORP]] - they need to cover Phydeaux, not just "report" on record releases. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 15:42, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
8038 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8035 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-02 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.278111180E09 +++$+++ Thats fine, if that that is the case - otherwise it will need to be a re-direct.  +++$+++ :::::: Thats fine, if that that is the case - otherwise it will need to be a re-direct. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 15:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
8039 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8035 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.278514860E09 +++$+++ Absent that notability rationale - I have re-redirected the article.  +++$+++ ::::::: Absent that notability rationale - I have re-redirected the article. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 08:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

532325 +++$+++ Havok +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532325 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-22 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.127440260E09 +++$+++ Please do not re-add \"History\", it is believed to be copyright violation. I have checked the history for the the edit, and it was added by Driz at 10:39, on the 16 of April 2005 with no notice if it was his or what not. I have found the same information on [http:\/\/www.rehorror.com\/ www.rehorror.com] and [http:\/\/darkwinds.net\/tyrant\/Umbhistory.htm], so until the information is found to NOT be in violation of any copyright, it stays off the article. If you revert again I will have to report the article as a [[Wikipedia:Possible copyright violations|possible copyright violation]]. Thank you. [[User:Havok|<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Havok<\/span>]] [[User_talk:Havok|(T]]\/ +++$+++ Please do not re-add "History", it is believed to be copyright violation. I have checked the history for the the edit, and it was added by Driz at 10:39, on the 16 of April 2005 with no notice if it was his or what not. I have found the same information on [http://www.rehorror.com/ www.rehorror.com] and [http://darkwinds.net/tyrant/Umbhistory.htm], so until the information is found to NOT be in violation of any copyright, it stays off the article. If you revert again I will have to report the article as a [[Wikipedia:Possible copyright violations|possible copyright violation]]. Thank you. [[User:Havok|<span style="font-weight: bold;">Havok</span>]] [[User_talk:Havok|(T]]/[[User:Havok/Contributions|C)]] 18:51, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
532326 +++$+++ Havok +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532325 +++$+++ 532325 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.127441820E09 +++$+++ Second, using slurs on my talk page really shows me what kind of person you are. Thank you for proving to me that your \"feelings\" on the subject should be ignored. [[User:Havok|<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Havok<\/span>]] [[User_talk:Havok|(T]]\/ +++$+++ :Second, using slurs on my talk page really shows me what kind of person you are. Thank you for proving to me that your "feelings" on the subject should be ignored. [[User:Havok|<span style="font-weight: bold;">Havok</span>]] [[User_talk:Havok|(T]]/[[User:Havok/Contributions|C)]] 19:17, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

270186 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-31 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.243826040E09 +++$+++ In this spirit, I have attempted to come up with a resolution to the ArbCom case, as posted here by Philcha. I am making some assumptions about your motivations in this resolutions, so you must confirm if they are accurate or deny them and offer alternatives to any objectionable stipulations. The 3 steward system I have formed has clear consequences in it, including the possibility that the stewards you agree to may block you. The success of this system depends on your willingness to have stress-free interactions with other editors. You must trust these stewards to tell you when you are wrong and back you up when you are right. I do not anticipate any further judgments attached to any steward's statement other than to give you a different perspective. But you must be willing to continue to work within the 3 steward system in the event that you are blocked. All four of you must be very honest about what you expect to happen with this system. If you are uncooperative it will fail. The alternative is the 60-day block at this moment. I, for one, think that is a last resort although I understand why it was offered. Your feedback is integral. -- +++$+++ In this spirit, I have attempted to come up with a resolution to the ArbCom case, as posted here by Philcha. I am making some assumptions about your motivations in this resolutions, so you must confirm if they are accurate or deny them and offer alternatives to any objectionable stipulations. The 3 steward system I have formed has clear consequences in it, including the possibility that the stewards you agree to may block you. The success of this system depends on your willingness to have stress-free interactions with other editors. You must trust these stewards to tell you when you are wrong and back you up when you are right. I do not anticipate any further judgments attached to any steward's statement other than to give you a different perspective. But you must be willing to continue to work within the 3 steward system in the event that you are blocked. All four of you must be very honest about what you expect to happen with this system. If you are uncooperative it will fail. The alternative is the 60-day block at this moment. I, for one, think that is a last resort although I understand why it was offered. Your feedback is integral. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 20:14, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
270187 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.243831860E09 +++$+++ I would use the word \"mentors\" but it seems there is opposition to the use of that word. I personally have no objection to a mentoring relationship. I have had such relationships in the past with [[User:Salix alba]], [[User:SilkTork]] and [[User:Geometry guy]], all of which were immensely satisfying. I welcome more such relationships and opportunities for feedback. [[User:Philcha]] and I have successfully collaborated in the past and hopefully we will continue to do so. Warmest regards, &mdash; +++$+++ *I would use the word "mentors" but it seems there is opposition to the use of that word. I personally have no objection to a mentoring relationship. I have had such relationships in the past with [[User:Salix alba]], [[User:SilkTork]] and [[User:Geometry guy]], all of which were immensely satisfying. I welcome more such relationships and opportunities for feedback. [[User:Philcha]] and I have successfully collaborated in the past and hopefully we will continue to do so. Warmest regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
270188 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.243898580E09 +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse. Moni3, RegentsPark and I have done a bit of work at [[User:Moni3\/Mattisse stewards arbcom]], and it probably needs review and comments from others, especially you, before any attempt to spell out procedures in any more detail. Please let us know if you spot any errors, omissions, things that are poorly explained or just plain bad ideas. Best wishes, -- +++$+++ :Hi, Mattisse. Moni3, RegentsPark and I have done a bit of work at [[User:Moni3/Mattisse stewards arbcom]], and it probably needs review and comments from others, especially you, before any attempt to spell out procedures in any more detail. Please let us know if you spot any errors, omissions, things that are poorly explained or just plain bad ideas. Best wishes, --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 16:23, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
270189 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 270188 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.243900140E09 +++$+++ Hi, Philcha. I'm sorry but  I am not up to copy editing at the moment. I have already made some initial comments in response to Moni3's inquiry at [[User_talk:Mattisse\/Plan#The_Mentors]]. There are also comments from others with which I basically agree at [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision#Edit_break]]. I could not openly consult with someone that was also my potential punisher - a person in the good parent\/bad parent role. The regime does not seem to be oriented toward furthering my growth in the use of collaborative relationships, but rather the opposite. Also, just three advisers would be inordinately stressful, as the likelihood that none of them would be available for periods of time would be high. Then I would be left rudderless under pressure.  However,  I will look at it more.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::Hi, Philcha. I'm sorry but  I am not up to copy editing at the moment. I have already made some initial comments in response to Moni3's inquiry at [[User_talk:Mattisse/Plan#The_Mentors]]. There are also comments from others with which I basically agree at [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision#Edit_break]]. I could not openly consult with someone that was also my potential punisher - a person in the good parent/bad parent role. The regime does not seem to be oriented toward furthering my growth in the use of collaborative relationships, but rather the opposite. Also, just three advisers would be inordinately stressful, as the likelihood that none of them would be available for periods of time would be high. Then I would be left rudderless under pressure.  However,  I will look at it more.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
270190 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 270189 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.243903260E09 +++$+++ BTW I notice you've listed a bunch of willing mentors. You should ask them to sign up in the bullet list at [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision#Users_willing_to_act_as_advisers]]. IMO the more the better, as it provides options like vacation cover and shift rotation. -- +++$+++ :::BTW I notice you've listed a bunch of willing mentors. You should ask them to sign up in the bullet list at [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision#Users_willing_to_act_as_advisers]]. IMO the more the better, as it provides options like vacation cover and shift rotation. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 17:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
270191 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 270190 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.243904520E09 +++$+++ I think my list of willing advisor would drop to zero if they have to do things like sign up for vacations and shift rotation.  I think the ArbCom wants me and my advisor(s) to decide on the details, such as number of advisors to insure that we each buy into it and are willing participants.  My understanding of their words, and I will read them again, is that for that reason, they want me in conjunction with the actual advisor(s) to come up with the proposals.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I think my list of willing advisor would drop to zero if they have to do things like sign up for vacations and shift rotation.  I think the ArbCom wants me and my advisor(s) to decide on the details, such as number of advisors to insure that we each buy into it and are willing participants.  My understanding of their words, and I will read them again, is that for that reason, they want me in conjunction with the actual advisor(s) to come up with the proposals.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
270192 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 270191 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.243905780E09 +++$+++ If you see possible improvements, speak up - it's for your benefit. -- +++$+++ :::::If you see possible improvements, speak up - it's for your benefit. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 18:23, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
270193 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 270192 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.243906440E09 +++$+++ Geometry guy has told me in the past that his wiki time is limited and that he does not like using what little he has on this kind of stuff. Ling.Nut does not always have computer access and is not always sure when he will. He has asked to be put at the bottom of the list. Salix alba goes for days without being on wiki, as does John Carter. Ottava Rima is often absent or preoccupied for days; for example, he has not entered into this discussion. SilkTork has has an infant to care for and does not always know when he will be available. Fowler&fowler has a busy real life, as do several others.  And so on. I think it would boil down to Malleus, who appears to be on wiki the most but who is not keen on being really involved, certainly not keen on being the mainstay.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision&curid=22760247&diff=293770303&oldid=293768904] &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::Geometry guy has told me in the past that his wiki time is limited and that he does not like using what little he has on this kind of stuff. Ling.Nut does not always have computer access and is not always sure when he will. He has asked to be put at the bottom of the list. Salix alba goes for days without being on wiki, as does John Carter. Ottava Rima is often absent or preoccupied for days; for example, he has not entered into this discussion. SilkTork has has an infant to care for and does not always know when he will be available. Fowler&fowler has a busy real life, as do several others.  And so on. I think it would boil down to Malleus, who appears to be on wiki the most but who is not keen on being really involved, certainly not keen on being the mainstay.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision&curid=22760247&diff=293770303&oldid=293768904] &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
270194 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 270193 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.243909380E09 +++$+++ So far 7 people have publicly signed up at [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision#Users_willing_to_act_as_advisers]]. That's in the 6-9 range I thought (about a week ago) would give sufficient cover. And with RegentsPark and Moni3 on the list we have 2 who keep similar hours to yours. I don't think the idea will fail for lack of willing mentors. Probably the best contribution you can make to getting the \"panel of mentors\" proposal adopted rather than something harsher would be for you to state at the Talk page which aspects work for you and which cause you concern. -- +++$+++ :::::::So far 7 people have publicly signed up at [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision#Users_willing_to_act_as_advisers]]. That's in the 6-9 range I thought (about a week ago) would give sufficient cover. And with RegentsPark and Moni3 on the list we have 2 who keep similar hours to yours. I don't think the idea will fail for lack of willing mentors. Probably the best contribution you can make to getting the "panel of mentors" proposal adopted rather than something harsher would be for you to state at the Talk page which aspects work for you and which cause you concern. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 19:23, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
270195 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 270194 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.243910640E09 +++$+++ Ling.Nut has said he is unwilling to be called a mentor as has SilkTork  and they are unwilling to impose sanctions. Malleus said that he is unwilling to participate in a round robin 24-hour help line.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision&curid=22760247&diff=293770303&oldid=293768904]. SilkTork has a new infant and has limited time. Geometry guy has limited wiki time. Fowler&fowler is busy in real life. They are great as a panel of advisors, but I don't know if they are willing to follow your program. That leaves only three, you, Moni3 and Regents Park (who also expressed some reluctance about imposing his judgment over mine). You would have to find out how they feel about your program.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::Ling.Nut has said he is unwilling to be called a mentor as has SilkTork  and they are unwilling to impose sanctions. Malleus said that he is unwilling to participate in a round robin 24-hour help line.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision&curid=22760247&diff=293770303&oldid=293768904]. SilkTork has a new infant and has limited time. Geometry guy has limited wiki time. Fowler&fowler is busy in real life. They are great as a panel of advisors, but I don't know if they are willing to follow your program. That leaves only three, you, Moni3 and Regents Park (who also expressed some reluctance about imposing his judgment over mine). You would have to find out how they feel about your program.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
270196 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 270195 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.243914240E09 +++$+++ The bottom line is that some people are willing to risk their reputations to help you. -- +++$+++ :::::::::The bottom line is that some people are willing to risk their reputations to help you. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 20:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
270197 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270186 +++$+++ 270196 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.243914480E09 +++$+++ I think you need to turn it down a notch Philcha. The only reputation on the line here is Mattisse's, and she needs to be given the time and space to consider what it is that ''she'' wants to do. -- +++$+++ ::::::::::I think you need to turn it down a notch Philcha. The only reputation on the line here is Mattisse's, and she needs to be given the time and space to consider what it is that ''she'' wants to do. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 20:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

8045 +++$+++ ImageTaggingBot +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8045 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-13 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.297584480E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your cooperation. -- +++$+++ Thank you for your cooperation. --[[User:ImageTaggingBot|ImageTaggingBot]] ([[User talk:ImageTaggingBot|talk]]) 00:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
8046 +++$+++ Arjayay +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8045 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.299801360E09 +++$+++ Rather as suggested in [[User talk:Smjwalsh#Larry_Norman_References]] above  +++$+++ ::Rather as suggested in [[User talk:Smjwalsh#Larry_Norman_References]] above [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 15:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
8047 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8045 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.299801780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the suggestions. I was going to deal with multiple cites later through use of the AWB process. +++$+++ :::Thanks for the suggestions. I was going to deal with multiple cites later through use of the AWB process.[[User:Smjwalsh|smjwalsh]] ([[User talk:Smjwalsh#top|talk]]) 16:03, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

532334 +++$+++ Shawnc +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-08 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.134088260E09 +++$+++ Nice page! I like Gradius too. Keep up the good work.  +++$+++ Nice page! I like Gradius too. Keep up the good work. [[User:Shawnc|Shawnc]] 16:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
532335 +++$+++ Diceman +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532334 +++$+++ 532334 +++$+++ 2005-12-19 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.135046220E09 +++$+++ When the original image has been deleted (as is the case with a number of other console pages) using the only available image for the infobox is justified. -  +++$+++ :When the original image has been deleted (as is the case with a number of other console pages) using the only available image for the infobox is justified. - [[User:Diceman|Diceman]] 18:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

8050 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-19 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.303245000E09 +++$+++ #Prose size (text only): 107 kB (18235 words) \"readable prose size\" +++$+++ #Prose size (text only): 107 kB (18235 words) "readable prose size"[[User:Smjwalsh|smjwalsh]] ([[User talk:Smjwalsh#top|talk]]) 13:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
8051 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8050 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-20 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.303285980E09 +++$+++ I agree on the need to consolidate references and there seems to be several ways to do it. In my academic research, where one can use ibids and op cits, it takes care of length issues. I too tend to be pedantic on cites since editing on WP. My usual practice would be to consolidate all sources in one footnote at the end of a paragraph, but WP seems to prefer sources individually. Also, I have edited other WP articles where chapter and verse is needed for every single edit. +++$+++ :::I agree on the need to consolidate references and there seems to be several ways to do it. In my academic research, where one can use ibids and op cits, it takes care of length issues. I too tend to be pedantic on cites since editing on WP. My usual practice would be to consolidate all sources in one footnote at the end of a paragraph, but WP seems to prefer sources individually. Also, I have edited other WP articles where chapter and verse is needed for every single edit.[[User:Smjwalsh|smjwalsh]] ([[User talk:Smjwalsh#top|talk]]) 00:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
8052 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8050 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-20 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.303285980E09 +++$+++ It may be as you say about page load speed. WP seems to prefer more references than less, but I'm sure there can be too much of a good thing:) +++$+++ :::It may be as you say about page load speed. WP seems to prefer more references than less, but I'm sure there can be too much of a good thing:)[[User:Smjwalsh|smjwalsh]] ([[User talk:Smjwalsh#top|talk]]) 00:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
8053 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8050 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-20 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.303285980E09 +++$+++ Thanbks again for the scholarship. While I edit all kinds of articles, and have created many that are quite small, I like to create quality articles for \"deserving subjects\", especially those slightly off the beaten path. Here's my take. Casual readers will find most of what they need about the subject in the lead. More interested readers, will look at specific sections. Most Christian readers will probably look at her bio details and the hymn section, but there is so much more to this subject unknown to both the hoi polloi (including me). There is a lot of erroneous, incomplete, and inadequate informatiojn scattered throughout the internet. Even the best, most scholarly biography (Blumhofer) misses stuff. I imagine the article will be split into \"Hymns of Fanny Crosby\", \"Poetry of Fanny Crosby\", \"Popular Songs of Fanny Crosby\", another on her career as a rescue worker, etc that will reduce the actual length of the main article. I do have a plan in mind and have done the same in other articles that have been as long as this one. +++$+++ :::Thanbks again for the scholarship. While I edit all kinds of articles, and have created many that are quite small, I like to create quality articles for "deserving subjects", especially those slightly off the beaten path. Here's my take. Casual readers will find most of what they need about the subject in the lead. More interested readers, will look at specific sections. Most Christian readers will probably look at her bio details and the hymn section, but there is so much more to this subject unknown to both the hoi polloi (including me). There is a lot of erroneous, incomplete, and inadequate informatiojn scattered throughout the internet. Even the best, most scholarly biography (Blumhofer) misses stuff. I imagine the article will be split into "Hymns of Fanny Crosby", "Poetry of Fanny Crosby", "Popular Songs of Fanny Crosby", another on her career as a rescue worker, etc that will reduce the actual length of the main article. I do have a plan in mind and have done the same in other articles that have been as long as this one.[[User:Smjwalsh|smjwalsh]] ([[User talk:Smjwalsh#top|talk]]) 00:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
8054 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8050 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-19 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.303261440E09 +++$+++ As for edit summaries, well, we all forget from time to time. As I understand it, the rule is that they should be used always. However, check the link I gave above if you do not fancy being consistent about it. -  +++$+++ ::As for edit summaries, well, we all forget from time to time. As I understand it, the rule is that they should be used always. However, check the link I gave above if you do not fancy being consistent about it. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 18:04, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
8055 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8050 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-20 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.303285980E09 +++$+++ I re-read the edit summary article. While it does say they should be used always, it also seems to suggest their use primarily in contentious edits, or when one is removing or changing the work of another editor, which I invariably do. As I tend to work away from the public glare until an article jumps into the top 50 of lengthy articles, and very few watch my articles, and because I make anywhere from 600 to 2,000 edits on these mega-articles, I have tended not to bother, and have rarely been called on it in these situations. I cannot recall a time when one of my 16,000+ edits have been mis-identified as vandalism. Thank you for your courtesy in dialoguing and your contributions to WP. +++$+++ :::I re-read the edit summary article. While it does say they should be used always, it also seems to suggest their use primarily in contentious edits, or when one is removing or changing the work of another editor, which I invariably do. As I tend to work away from the public glare until an article jumps into the top 50 of lengthy articles, and very few watch my articles, and because I make anywhere from 600 to 2,000 edits on these mega-articles, I have tended not to bother, and have rarely been called on it in these situations. I cannot recall a time when one of my 16,000+ edits have been mis-identified as vandalism. Thank you for your courtesy in dialoguing and your contributions to WP.[[User:Smjwalsh|smjwalsh]] ([[User talk:Smjwalsh#top|talk]]) 00:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

219795 +++$+++ Ryoung122 +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-06 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.267881840E09 +++$+++ By the way, Dora McRae lives in Maine (the US), not the UK...and it's almost certain she is still alive, even if we have not seen a news report. +++$+++ By the way, Dora McRae lives in Maine (the US), not the UK...and it's almost certain she is still alive, even if we have not seen a news report.[[User:Ryoung122|<span style="color:red">Ryoung</span><span style="color:blue">122</span>]] 05:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
219796 +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219795 +++$+++ 219795 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.267882200E09 +++$+++ I know that IP address user. He edits my page occasionally. Its not me at all. Thx for tip on McRae living in US. Had no idea at all. I know that Australian claimant u were talking about. -- +++$+++ :I know that IP address user. He edits my page occasionally. Its not me at all. Thx for tip on McRae living in US. Had no idea at all. I know that Australian claimant u were talking about. --[[User:NickOrnstein|Nick Ornstein]] ([[User talk:NickOrnstein#top|talk]]) 05:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

532340 +++$+++ Vic Vipr +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532340 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-02 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.136228700E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the absence! Back now &mdash; +++$+++ Sorry for the absence! Back now &mdash;[[User:Vic Vipr|Vic Vipr]] 11:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
532341 +++$+++ Vic Vipr +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532340 +++$+++ 532340 +++$+++ 2006-01-12 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.137124800E09 +++$+++ Just a quick question, do you want to keep compilations in the gradius template? Personally I'm not sure since we already have specific articles for most of them. Thoughts? - +++$+++ :Just a quick question, do you want to keep compilations in the gradius template? Personally I'm not sure since we already have specific articles for most of them. Thoughts? -[[User:Vic Vipr|Vic Vipr]] 20:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

270198 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-01 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.243925100E09 +++$+++ ...too many forums! Everything is spread all over Wikipedia. Can we all agree to talk in one and only one place?  +++$+++ ...too many forums! Everything is spread all over Wikipedia. Can we all agree to talk in one and only one place? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 23:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
270199 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270198 +++$+++ 270198 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.243925880E09 +++$+++ Well Geometry guy suggested that I start a user spage page for the development of my plan so I used one of the links he suggested [[User talk:Mattisse\/Plan]]. He said it was important that I have some control over my proposal. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ *Well Geometry guy suggested that I start a user spage page for the development of my plan so I used one of the links he suggested [[User talk:Mattisse/Plan]]. He said it was important that I have some control over my proposal. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
270200 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270198 +++$+++ 270199 +++$+++ 2009-06-02 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.243928880E09 +++$+++ Yup! My point is that all this chatter on your Talk is unproductive, and should be moved to your Plan forum. Everyone chats on their Talk page, of course, but your talk page threatens to be overwhelmed by this talk. What will people do if they wanna ask questions about articles? You know, there ''is'' this thing called an ''encyclopedia'' out there somewhere in Wikipedia space.. :-P  +++$+++ :* Yup! My point is that all this chatter on your Talk is unproductive, and should be moved to your Plan forum. Everyone chats on their Talk page, of course, but your talk page threatens to be overwhelmed by this talk. What will people do if they wanna ask questions about articles? You know, there ''is'' this thing called an ''encyclopedia'' out there somewhere in Wikipedia space.. :-P [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 00:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
270201 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270198 +++$+++ 270200 +++$+++ 2009-06-02 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.243929780E09 +++$+++ Do you think I should move what is here to a talk page off of [[User talk:Mattisse\/Plan]] such as [[User talk:Mattisse\/Plan talk]]? Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::*Do you think I should move what is here to a talk page off of [[User talk:Mattisse/Plan]] such as [[User talk:Mattisse/Plan talk]]? Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
270202 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270198 +++$+++ 270201 +++$+++ 2009-06-02 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.243930080E09 +++$+++ I dunno. They're your pages! ;-) But I think that going forward maybe we should try to chat more there than here, when we are talking about this topic. My psychic powers are informing me that there are one or more Wikipedia n00bs aching to ask content-related questions from an old hand like yourself, but unsure where to turn... and perplexed by all this talk on your Talk... later!  +++$+++ :::*I dunno. They're your pages! ;-) But I think that going forward maybe we should try to chat more there than here, when we are talking about this topic. My psychic powers are informing me that there are one or more Wikipedia n00bs aching to ask content-related questions from an old hand like yourself, but unsure where to turn... and perplexed by all this talk on your Talk... later! [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 01:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

8057 +++$+++ Arjayay +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-21 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.303397760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 07:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
8058 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8057 +++$+++ 8057 +++$+++ 2011-04-22 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.303479720E09 +++$+++ I read your comments with interest and the relevant WP article. I apologise for reversing the lot but could not find a quick and convenient way to reverse some. I should not have done so, but was not aware of the over-linking guideliness and could not see the harm in the 15-20 links you de-linked. I just tried to undo my edit but could not, getting this message: \"The edit could not be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits\". So if you can, please do so with the assurance it won't be reverted by me. I appreciate your comments and the way you communicated them. +++$+++ :I read your comments with interest and the relevant WP article. I apologise for reversing the lot but could not find a quick and convenient way to reverse some. I should not have done so, but was not aware of the over-linking guideliness and could not see the harm in the 15-20 links you de-linked. I just tried to undo my edit but could not, getting this message: "The edit could not be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits". So if you can, please do so with the assurance it won't be reverted by me. I appreciate your comments and the way you communicated them.[[User:Smjwalsh|smjwalsh]] ([[User talk:Smjwalsh#top|talk]]) 06:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

270203 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-02 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.244009760E09 +++$+++ This is just my opinion, however. There are many interested editors, and we need a way to allow everyone to contribute without snarling up the process by going round the same issues again and again. '' +++$+++ This is just my opinion, however. There are many interested editors, and we need a way to allow everyone to contribute without snarling up the process by going round the same issues again and again. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
270204 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270203 +++$+++ 270203 +++$+++ 2009-06-02 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.244012220E09 +++$+++ If I create the page  [[User:Mattisse\/Plan]], where should I put the link? At the bottom of the talk plan page? And perhaps at the Arbitration workshop page?  &mdash; +++$+++ :If I create the page  [[User:Mattisse/Plan]], where should I put the link? At the bottom of the talk plan page? And perhaps at the Arbitration workshop page?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
270205 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270203 +++$+++ 270204 +++$+++ 2009-06-03 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.244013360E09 +++$+++ My suggestion is that this will ultimately be the page you submit to ArbCom if\/when they ask for it (in a couple of weeks or more perhaps). But the current priority is to attract and encourage the advice of editors to help you make the plan as good as it can be. '' +++$+++ ::My suggestion is that this will ultimately be the page you submit to ArbCom if/when they ask for it (in a couple of weeks or more perhaps). But the current priority is to attract and encourage the advice of editors to help you make the plan as good as it can be. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 00:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
270206 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270203 +++$+++ 270205 +++$+++ 2009-06-03 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.244020380E09 +++$+++ People adding suggestions is one thing, but chatting ceaselessly with one another (and not with Mattisse) is something else again. The way I see it is this: take me and SilkTork for example. ST made his suggestions. I made mine. Fine. Done. There's no reason on God's green earth for he and I to babble at each other (or worse yet, babble with ten other people, including God knows who) about our suggestions. If Mattisse has a question, fine, she asks, we answer. But if ten people make suggestions ''and eighty people blather about them'', then the result is chaos in which Mattisse has no clear voice.  +++$+++ :::People adding suggestions is one thing, but chatting ceaselessly with one another (and not with Mattisse) is something else again. The way I see it is this: take me and SilkTork for example. ST made his suggestions. I made mine. Fine. Done. There's no reason on God's green earth for he and I to babble at each other (or worse yet, babble with ten other people, including God knows who) about our suggestions. If Mattisse has a question, fine, she asks, we answer. But if ten people make suggestions ''and eighty people blather about them'', then the result is chaos in which Mattisse has no clear voice. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 02:13, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
270207 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270203 +++$+++ 270206 +++$+++ 2009-06-03 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.244022480E09 +++$+++ I appreciate all suggestions, as I am at a loss here. Reggards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I appreciate all suggestions, as I am at a loss here. Reggards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

8060 +++$+++ Walter Görlitz +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8060 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.309763400E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=David_Di_Sabatino&action=historysubmit&diff=437624934&oldid=436734074 This edit] was well-done! -- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Di_Sabatino&action=historysubmit&diff=437624934&oldid=436734074 This edit] was well-done! --[[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 00:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
8061 +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ Smjwalsh +++$+++ 8060 +++$+++ 8060 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.309789440E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I had something similar when article was first created. I have both editions of DDS's bibliography and have appreciated his writings over the years. I have always tried to be fair to him prefering to discuss his work than the other stuff that people focus on. +++$+++ :Thanks. I had something similar when article was first created. I have both editions of DDS's bibliography and have appreciated his writings over the years. I have always tried to be fair to him prefering to discuss his work than the other stuff that people focus on.[[User:Smjwalsh|smjwalsh]] ([[User talk:Smjwalsh#top|talk]]) 07:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

532349 +++$+++ Zilog Jones +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532349 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-27 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.138416000E09 +++$+++ Damn, you beat me to it (I was the one who mentioned it on the Pantarou talk page) - good work! I have to say it's one of the only old Konami games I've actually managed to finish - I can't even beat the first boss in the MSX Parodius! ^_^ -- +++$+++ Damn, you beat me to it (I was the one who mentioned it on the Pantarou talk page) - good work! I have to say it's one of the only old Konami games I've actually managed to finish - I can't even beat the first boss in the MSX Parodius! ^_^ --[[User:Zilog Jones|Zilog Jones]] 18:40, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
532350 +++$+++ Zilog Jones +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532349 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-27 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.138418280E09 +++$+++ Regarding the whole obesity issue with Yume Penguin Monogatari - I don't think Konami were trying to make some sort of political or sociological (or whatever other -ology) statement with the game, but then again what way NOA took the game is a totally different matter. It was probably just too quirky and cute for North American release regardless of that. -- +++$+++ ::Regarding the whole obesity issue with Yume Penguin Monogatari - I don't think Konami were trying to make some sort of political or sociological (or whatever other -ology) statement with the game, but then again what way NOA took the game is a totally different matter. It was probably just too quirky and cute for North American release regardless of that. --[[User:Zilog Jones|Zilog Jones]] 19:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
532351 +++$+++ Zilog Jones +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532349 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-27 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.138418580E09 +++$+++ My only issue with the articles right now are the use of names - in all the MSX games he was only really called \"Pengiun\" (I don't think the Pentarou name came into place until [[Parodius Da!]]), so I think the articles on the MSX games should reflect this. -- +++$+++ :::My only issue with the articles right now are the use of names - in all the MSX games he was only really called "Pengiun" (I don't think the Pentarou name came into place until [[Parodius Da!]]), so I think the articles on the MSX games should reflect this. --[[User:Zilog Jones|Zilog Jones]] 19:23, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

8064 +++$+++ 63.124.111.130 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8064 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-06 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.254884940E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/63.124.111.130|63.124.111.130]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/63.124.111.130|63.124.111.130]] ([[User talk:63.124.111.130|talk]]) 20:09, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
8065 +++$+++ 63.124.111.130 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8064 +++$+++ 8064 +++$+++ 2009-10-07 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.254968340E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/63.124.111.130|63.124.111.130]] ( +++$+++ :[[Special:Contributions/63.124.111.130|63.124.111.130]] ([[User talk:63.124.111.130|talk]]) 19:19, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
8066 +++$+++ 63.124.111.130 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8064 +++$+++ 8064 +++$+++ 2009-10-07 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.254969360E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/63.124.111.130|63.124.111.130]] ( +++$+++ :[[Special:Contributions/63.124.111.130|63.124.111.130]] ([[User talk:63.124.111.130|talk]]) 19:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
8067 +++$+++ Pats1 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8064 +++$+++ 8064 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.228565940E09 +++$+++ In 48 hours or earlier, you will be unblocked and allowed to edit again. I hope by then you are able to read and understand the points I made above, because if you do not, then there will continue to be further problems. You currently are a major part of making sure NFL pages stay updated, and I would really would not like to lose you as an editor here. Being an editor on Wikipedia entails more than just passively editing pages. Blocking you is a last resort, but it unfortunately has become the only way of communicating with you.  +++$+++ :In 48 hours or earlier, you will be unblocked and allowed to edit again. I hope by then you are able to read and understand the points I made above, because if you do not, then there will continue to be further problems. You currently are a major part of making sure NFL pages stay updated, and I would really would not like to lose you as an editor here. Being an editor on Wikipedia entails more than just passively editing pages. Blocking you is a last resort, but it unfortunately has become the only way of communicating with you. [[User:Pats1|<b><font color="#0d254c">Pats</font><font color="#8f8f8f">1</font></b>]] [[User_talk:Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><sup><small>'''T'''</small></sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><small>'''C'''</small></font>]] 04:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
8068 +++$+++ Pats1 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8064 +++$+++ 8067 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.228812840E09 +++$+++ You obviously didn't read bullet point #5 (or #4, since you didn't leave an edit summary), given your latest edits to [[2008 New England Patriots season]].  +++$+++ ::You obviously didn't read bullet point #5 (or #4, since you didn't leave an edit summary), given your latest edits to [[2008 New England Patriots season]]. [[User:Pats1|<b><font color="#0d254c">Pats</font><font color="#8f8f8f">1</font></b>]] [[User_talk:Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><sup><small>'''T'''</small></sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><small>'''C'''</small></font>]] 00:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

270210 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-03 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.244092320E09 +++$+++ Hope this helps. -- +++$+++ Hope this helps. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 22:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
270211 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270210 +++$+++ 270210 +++$+++ 2009-06-03 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.244093160E09 +++$+++ The hard part is coming up with a monitoring plan. Per ArbCom: ''The plan should also address how any lapses by Mattisse from the standards of behavior described in the plan shall be addressed.''  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :The hard part is coming up with a monitoring plan. Per ArbCom: ''The plan should also address how any lapses by Mattisse from the standards of behavior described in the plan shall be addressed.''  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
270212 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270210 +++$+++ 270210 +++$+++ 2009-06-04 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.244113500E09 +++$+++ Later!  +++$+++ * Later! [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 04:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
270213 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270210 +++$+++ 270210 +++$+++ 2009-06-04 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.244182380E09 +++$+++ I think asking folks one by one to reply to your Plan is a very, very good idea.  +++$+++ * I think asking folks one by one to reply to your Plan is a very, very good idea. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 23:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
270214 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270210 +++$+++ 270210 +++$+++ 2009-06-05 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.244190000E09 +++$+++ Thanks I did not notice so it is a good thing you let me know! I responded as best I can. I have asked some people to respond to my plan: Malleus, Ottava Rima, Salix Alba, Geometry guy, SilkTork, and John Carter. And, of course, you.  Moni3 and Philichea know about it and have commented on the talk page.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks I did not notice so it is a good thing you let me know! I responded as best I can. I have asked some people to respond to my plan: Malleus, Ottava Rima, Salix Alba, Geometry guy, SilkTork, and John Carter. And, of course, you.  Moni3 and Philichea know about it and have commented on the talk page.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:20, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

532357 +++$+++ Thunderbrand +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-08 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.139392680E09 +++$+++ That's pretty good for a new article! I read through it and it sounds OK. I'm not really an expert in that field so I wouldn't really know what to add. Nice work.  +++$+++ That's pretty good for a new article! I read through it and it sounds OK. I'm not really an expert in that field so I wouldn't really know what to add. Nice work. [[User:Thunderbrand|Thunderbrand]] 01:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
532358 +++$+++ Jacoplane +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532357 +++$+++ 532357 +++$+++ 2006-02-08 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.139398920E09 +++$+++ Yeah, indeed, good job! I've added it to my watchlist and I'll ponder over how I think it could be improved. In the mean time, please give your opinion on  [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer and video games#Proposed merge|this]] ;) <font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ :Yeah, indeed, good job! I've added it to my watchlist and I'll ponder over how I think it could be improved. In the mean time, please give your opinion on  [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer and video games#Proposed merge|this]] ;) <font color="red">[[User:Jacoplane|Jaco]]</font><font color="blue">[[User_talk:Jacoplane|plane]]</font> 03:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

8070 +++$+++ Richmond96 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-09 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.228812900E09 +++$+++ Your summaries could be alot better if you would not start each one with the same sentence (\"Hoping to rebound...\" or \"Coming off the win over...\"). See this summary [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/2008_dallas_cowboys#Week_13:_at_Pittsburgh_Steelers here] for a good example. Your summaries are a big help and I just want to help you make them better. '''~ +++$+++ Your summaries could be alot better if you would not start each one with the same sentence ("Hoping to rebound..." or "Coming off the win over..."). See this summary [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_dallas_cowboys#Week_13:_at_Pittsburgh_Steelers here] for a good example. Your summaries are a big help and I just want to help you make them better. '''~[[User:Richmond96|<span style="color:blue;">Richmond</span><span style="color:#FF4A00;">96 </span>]]<small>[[User talk:Richmond96|<span style="color:blue;">t</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Richmond96|<span style="color:blue;">c</span>]]</small>''' 00:55, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
8071 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8070 +++$+++ 8070 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.228812960E09 +++$+++ Ditto.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :Ditto.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 00:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
8072 +++$+++ 206.233.95.18 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8070 +++$+++ 8070 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.228865400E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/206.233.95.18|206.233.95.18]] ( +++$+++ :[[Special:Contributions/206.233.95.18|206.233.95.18]] ([[User talk:206.233.95.18|talk]]) 15:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

270215 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-06 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.244274660E09 +++$+++ I was astonished that a 2005 FA could look so good and be up-to-date with today's FA standards, until I looked through the page history. Nice work.  +++$+++ I was astonished that a 2005 FA could look so good and be up-to-date with today's FA standards, until I looked through the page history. Nice work. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 00:51, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
270216 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270215 +++$+++ 270215 +++$+++ 2009-06-06 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.244274840E09 +++$+++ Thank you!  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you!  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

8073 +++$+++ Richmond96 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8073 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-11 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.229062500E09 +++$+++ Once again, dont use \"Indy\" \"Jags\" \"Pats\" \"Phins\" \"boys\" or any nicknames in your summaries. They are not from a neutral point of view. '''~ +++$+++ Once again, dont use "Indy" "Jags" "Pats" "Phins" "boys" or any nicknames in your summaries. They are not from a neutral point of view. '''~[[User:Richmond96|<span style="color:blue;">Richmond</span><span style="color:#FF4A00;">96 </span>]]<small>[[User talk:Richmond96|<span style="color:blue;">t</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Richmond96|<span style="color:blue;">c</span>]]</small>''' 22:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
8074 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8073 +++$+++ 8073 +++$+++ 2008-12-11 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.229063940E09 +++$+++ This is pretty unbelievable.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :This is pretty unbelievable.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 22:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
8075 +++$+++ Pats1 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8073 +++$+++ 8074 +++$+++ 2008-12-12 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.229081520E09 +++$+++ Also, please refrain from using position abbreviations like \"TE\" or \"CB,\" as this could confuse non-American football followers.  +++$+++ ::Also, please refrain from using position abbreviations like "TE" or "CB," as this could confuse non-American football followers. [[User:Pats1|<b><font color="#0d254c">Pats</font><font color="#8f8f8f">1</font></b>]] [[User_talk:Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><sup><small>'''T'''</small></sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><small>'''C'''</small></font>]] 03:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
8076 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8073 +++$+++ 8075 +++$+++ 2008-12-12 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.229082840E09 +++$+++ How much more of this until we just ban him from this are altogether?\u25ba''' +++$+++ :::How much more of this until we just ban him from this are altogether?►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 03:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
8077 +++$+++ Pats1 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8073 +++$+++ 8076 +++$+++ 2008-12-12 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.229084760E09 +++$+++ He's getting better, and the transgressions are not ''that'' bad. Just gotta get him to read this, and he seems to get the point.  +++$+++ ::::He's getting better, and the transgressions are not ''that'' bad. Just gotta get him to read this, and he seems to get the point. [[User:Pats1|<b><font color="#0d254c">Pats</font><font color="#8f8f8f">1</font></b>]] [[User_talk:Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><sup><small>'''T'''</small></sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><small>'''C'''</small></font>]] 04:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
8078 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8073 +++$+++ 8077 +++$+++ 2008-12-12 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.229085720E09 +++$+++ His writing is still repetitive to a retarded extent.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :::::His writing is still repetitive to a retarded extent.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 04:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

532362 +++$+++  +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532362 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Im thinking about applying for adminship, do you think its a good idea? Or should i hold off for now till i build up my street cred some more. --Larsinio 22:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ Im thinking about applying for adminship, do you think its a good idea? Or should i hold off for now till i build up my street cred some more. --Larsinio 22:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
532363 +++$+++ Jacoplane +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532362 +++$+++ 532362 +++$+++ 2006-02-13 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.139900460E09 +++$+++ Your [http:\/\/tools.wikimedia.de\/~interiot\/cgi-bin\/count_edits?user=Larsinio&dbname=enwiki_p record] on Interiot's tool looks good enough for Adminship, at least for the Mainspace (articles). If you run for adminship, there will be a lot of people who will oppose on the grounds that you have little experience within the Wikipedia: namespace. I would recommend that you spend some time voting\/commenting on other people's RfA's, and participate in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]]. Of course, any contribution on Wikipedia:WikiProject CVG also helps here :) Anyway, if you do that for a month or so I'll nominate you myself. Cheers! <font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ :Your [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=Larsinio&dbname=enwiki_p record] on Interiot's tool looks good enough for Adminship, at least for the Mainspace (articles). If you run for adminship, there will be a lot of people who will oppose on the grounds that you have little experience within the Wikipedia: namespace. I would recommend that you spend some time voting/commenting on other people's RfA's, and participate in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]]. Of course, any contribution on Wikipedia:WikiProject CVG also helps here :) Anyway, if you do that for a month or so I'll nominate you myself. Cheers! <font color="red">[[User:Jacoplane|Jaco]]</font><font color="blue">[[User_talk:Jacoplane|plane]]</font> 23:01, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
532364 +++$+++ larsinio +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532362 +++$+++ 532362 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.140129000E09 +++$+++ I reverted his blanked out talk page. Youre not supposed to blank out your talk page , moving to archive yes. blanking no. This user obviously does not know what hes talkinga bout -- +++$+++ :I reverted his blanked out talk page. Youre not supposed to blank out your talk page , moving to archive yes. blanking no. This user obviously does not know what hes talkinga bout --[[User:Larsinio|Larsinio]] 14:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
532365 +++$+++ Taxman +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532362 +++$+++ 532364 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.140172020E09 +++$+++ Actually user's are allowed to do that in most circumstances. It's not the greatest idea, and doesn't really hide anything. I would recommend leaving the user alone now unless they actually vandalize pages. The personal attacks are another thing, and that has to stop. But I imagine they will if you move out of the situation. -  +++$+++ ::Actually user's are allowed to do that in most circumstances. It's not the greatest idea, and doesn't really hide anything. I would recommend leaving the user alone now unless they actually vandalize pages. The personal attacks are another thing, and that has to stop. But I imagine they will if you move out of the situation. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Taxman|Talk]]</small></sup> 02:27, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

270219 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-08 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.244501940E09 +++$+++ Among your very helpful edits to ''[[On the Origin of Species]]'', you questioned in an edit aummary \"not clear who was \"as missionaries\" - the Fuegians?\" They were indeed, according to Desmond and Moore, under the leadership of trainee missionary, a Mr. Matthews who found it rather hard going and left them to continue with the Anglican mission work on their own. See [[Second voyage of HMS Beagle#Tierra del Fuego]] for the dismal tale. Having said that, your edit was really for the best as it's a bit of a side issue, so I've left that aspect out. . .  +++$+++ Among your very helpful edits to ''[[On the Origin of Species]]'', you questioned in an edit aummary "not clear who was "as missionaries" - the Fuegians?" They were indeed, according to Desmond and Moore, under the leadership of trainee missionary, a Mr. Matthews who found it rather hard going and left them to continue with the Anglican mission work on their own. See [[Second voyage of HMS Beagle#Tierra del Fuego]] for the dismal tale. Having said that, your edit was really for the best as it's a bit of a side issue, so I've left that aspect out. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:59, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
270220 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270219 +++$+++ 270219 +++$+++ 2009-06-08 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.244503920E09 +++$+++ Your explanation does clarify  why the three Fuegians might be different than those on the island, but I agree that it is tempting to get into distracting detail! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Your explanation does clarify  why the three Fuegians might be different than those on the island, but I agree that it is tempting to get into distracting detail! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:32, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

270221 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-09 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.244536020E09 +++$+++ You'll recall that I had some reservations when you asked me to join the mentor list &mdash; not reservations about you, but reservations about the fact that I'm not too tightly attached to Wikipedia these days. So now I'm going to try to retire again. I wish the very best for you in all these things...  +++$+++ You'll recall that I had some reservations when you asked me to join the mentor list &mdash; not reservations about you, but reservations about the fact that I'm not too tightly attached to Wikipedia these days. So now I'm going to try to retire again. I wish the very best for you in all these things... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 01:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
270222 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270221 +++$+++ 270221 +++$+++ 2009-06-11 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.244704920E09 +++$+++ I understand and will miss you and hope fervently that  you will be back as you.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I understand and will miss you and hope fervently that  you will be back as you.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
270223 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270221 +++$+++ 270221 +++$+++ 2009-06-09 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.244592300E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I, on the other hand, am certainly not retiring, but will be away until July 1.  (We are moving and I'm finding myself strapped for time, finding also that, in order to de-stress at the end of the day, I'm making random edits on pages that I usually don't edit.  I certainly would like to me among your list of advisers, friends, and mentors, but I'm finding this RfArb becoming too complicated&mdash;requiring a measure of focus that I can't bring to bear on the topic right now.  Could Geometry Guy, Malleus F., and RegentsPark pinch hit for me until July 1?  In other words, I trust them enough that I'll go along with their proposals, if they have your blessings as well.  You can always reach me by email in the event of any Arbitration-related emergency.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Mattisse, I, on the other hand, am certainly not retiring, but will be away until July 1.  (We are moving and I'm finding myself strapped for time, finding also that, in order to de-stress at the end of the day, I'm making random edits on pages that I usually don't edit.  I certainly would like to me among your list of advisers, friends, and mentors, but I'm finding this RfArb becoming too complicated&mdash;requiring a measure of focus that I can't bring to bear on the topic right now.  Could Geometry Guy, Malleus F., and RegentsPark pinch hit for me until July 1?  In other words, I trust them enough that I'll go along with their proposals, if they have your blessings as well.  You can always reach me by email in the event of any Arbitration-related emergency.  Regards, [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 17:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
270224 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270221 +++$+++ 270223 +++$+++ 2009-06-09 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.244592540E09 +++$+++ Sure! Just as long as you are not going away forever, which would be a huge loss. I certainly support anything that de-stresses you.  Good luck with you moving. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::Sure! Just as long as you are not going away forever, which would be a huge loss. I certainly support anything that de-stresses you.  Good luck with you moving. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

471637 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471637 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-03 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.188840900E09 +++$+++ Please do not change journal category names without proposing and discussing the change. see WP:CATEGORY. The work is sufficient that they must be discussed and get consensus first. These changes are not trivial,   because every contained item must be charged. The question of whether to say academic and scholarly for example has been discussed at length, along with the distinction from scientific. It's necessary to be consistent with other parallel parts of Wikipedia. This is the type of potentially far reaching change that can not be done BOLDly. ''' +++$+++ Please do not change journal category names without proposing and discussing the change. see WP:CATEGORY. The work is sufficient that they must be discussed and get consensus first. These changes are not trivial,   because every contained item must be charged. The question of whether to say academic and scholarly for example has been discussed at length, along with the distinction from scientific. It's necessary to be consistent with other parallel parts of Wikipedia. This is the type of potentially far reaching change that can not be done BOLDly. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 10:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
471638 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471637 +++$+++ 471637 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 10:42:00 +++$+++ 1.188841320E09 +++$+++ Sure, I will be careful. I'm not going to try and make or propose any major changes without discussion first. As you say, making such changes is difficult because of the sheer number of edits needed. I find it best to discuss renaming at a WikiProject, get consensus, then propose at CfD so the bot that deals with that can do the boring stuff. I'm trying to get discussion going at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academic Journals]], and trying to lay out a plan at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals\/Categories]]. I've been thinking about this distinction between academic, scientific and literary, and it would be good to come up with some examples and definitions to help categorization be more consistent. Such guidelines can then be put on the category pages. It would also be helpful to link to previous discussions. Do you have links to these previous discussions?  +++$+++ :Sure, I will be careful. I'm not going to try and make or propose any major changes without discussion first. As you say, making such changes is difficult because of the sheer number of edits needed. I find it best to discuss renaming at a WikiProject, get consensus, then propose at CfD so the bot that deals with that can do the boring stuff. I'm trying to get discussion going at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academic Journals]], and trying to lay out a plan at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Categories]]. I've been thinking about this distinction between academic, scientific and literary, and it would be good to come up with some examples and definitions to help categorization be more consistent. Such guidelines can then be put on the category pages. It would also be helpful to link to previous discussions. Do you have links to these previous discussions? [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 10:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

8079 +++$+++ Blackngold29 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8079 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-12 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.229142240E09 +++$+++ Also, please stop adding totals to the linescore summary as you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=2008_Pittsburgh_Steelers_season&diff=257520494&oldid=257369244 here]. I've told you about this multiple times and you did stop for a while, which I appreciate. Also do not fill in 0s for the score until the game has been played. I don't know why you do things like this because its a waste of your time too. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma\">''' +++$+++ Also, please stop adding totals to the linescore summary as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2008_Pittsburgh_Steelers_season&diff=257520494&oldid=257369244 here]. I've told you about this multiple times and you did stop for a while, which I appreciate. Also do not fill in 0s for the score until the game has been played. I don't know why you do things like this because its a waste of your time too. <span style="font-family: tahoma">'''[[User:Blackngold29|<span style="color:black">black</span>]][[User talk:Blackngold29|<span style="color:#B8860B">ngold29</span>]]'''</span> 20:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
8080 +++$+++ Blackngold29 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8079 +++$+++ 8079 +++$+++ 2008-12-28 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.230460920E09 +++$+++ Again, DO NOT add totals to the linescore summary as you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=2008_Pittsburgh_Steelers_season&curid=14870870&diff=260417213&oldid=260360816 here]. They should not be filled in until the game has been played, adding zeros gives the mis-leading appearence that the game was scoreless. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma\">''' +++$+++ :Again, DO NOT add totals to the linescore summary as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2008_Pittsburgh_Steelers_season&curid=14870870&diff=260417213&oldid=260360816 here]. They should not be filled in until the game has been played, adding zeros gives the mis-leading appearence that the game was scoreless. <span style="font-family: tahoma">'''[[User:Blackngold29|<span style="color:black">black</span>]][[User talk:Blackngold29|<span style="color:#B8860B">ngold29</span>]]'''</span> 02:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

8081 +++$+++ 63.124.111.130 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-24 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.253850120E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/63.124.111.130|63.124.111.130]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/63.124.111.130|63.124.111.130]] ([[User talk:63.124.111.130|talk]]) 20:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
8082 +++$+++ Pats1 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8081 +++$+++ 8081 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.229167200E09 +++$+++ I feel like I'm banging my head against a wall with you.  +++$+++ :I feel like I'm banging my head against a wall with you. [[User:Pats1|<b><font color="#0d254c">Pats</font><font color="#8f8f8f">1</font></b>]] [[User_talk:Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><sup><small>'''T'''</small></sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><small>'''C'''</small></font>]] 03:20, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
8083 +++$+++ Pats1 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8081 +++$+++ 8082 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.229489100E09 +++$+++ No, it's more than just that. You kept re-linking CBS when I've told you at least thrice not to do that. And you seemed to have ignored everything I told you as it pertains to edit summaries and engaging in talk page discussions. That's all we're asking for.  +++$+++ ::No, it's more than just that. You kept re-linking CBS when I've told you at least thrice not to do that. And you seemed to have ignored everything I told you as it pertains to edit summaries and engaging in talk page discussions. That's all we're asking for. [[User:Pats1|<b><font color="#0d254c">Pats</font><font color="#8f8f8f">1</font></b>]] [[User_talk:Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><sup><small>'''T'''</small></sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Pats1|<font color="#c0001d"><small>'''C'''</small></font>]] 20:45, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
8084 +++$+++ Doctorindy +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8081 +++$+++ 8083 +++$+++ 2009-09-25 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.253864640E09 +++$+++ I second the comment immediately above. The legidimate suggestions offered above seem to have been ignored. DO NOT start every single summary with \"Hoping to rebound from the loss\" or \"So-and-so flew to ___\" or bad grammar such as \"got a field goal.\" Plus, please learn how to use the scorebox. It has a script in it that totals the score for you. Many of the summaries, as pointed out already, are not neutral POV, are campy, and do not hold up to the formal style they should be. In addition, it's one thing to be a heavy contributor, but with 32 teams in the league, you alone do not need to be the editor for all 32 team season pages. There are plenty of other very good editors who dedicate a lot of time to these individual season pages. I suggest you select a handful to concetrate on, and do them well, instead of doing 32 of them poorly.  +++$+++ :::I second the comment immediately above. The legidimate suggestions offered above seem to have been ignored. DO NOT start every single summary with "Hoping to rebound from the loss" or "So-and-so flew to ___" or bad grammar such as "got a field goal." Plus, please learn how to use the scorebox. It has a script in it that totals the score for you. Many of the summaries, as pointed out already, are not neutral POV, are campy, and do not hold up to the formal style they should be. In addition, it's one thing to be a heavy contributor, but with 32 teams in the league, you alone do not need to be the editor for all 32 team season pages. There are plenty of other very good editors who dedicate a lot of time to these individual season pages. I suggest you select a handful to concetrate on, and do them well, instead of doing 32 of them poorly. [[User:Doctorindy|Doctorindy]] ([[User talk:Doctorindy|talk]]) 00:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

270227 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270227 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-09 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.244608800E09 +++$+++ Possibly not what you meant, but if it was, please revert me [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/On_the_Origin_of_Species\/archive1&diff=next&oldid=295453344 diff]!  +++$+++ Possibly not what you meant, but if it was, please revert me [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/On_the_Origin_of_Species/archive1&diff=next&oldid=295453344 diff]! [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 21:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
270228 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270227 +++$+++ 270227 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.244697180E09 +++$+++ Speaking of which, sorry you're finding concerns about recent directions, a pointer about the particular issues would be greatly appreciated. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Speaking of which, sorry you're finding concerns about recent directions, a pointer about the particular issues would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
270229 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270227 +++$+++ 270228 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.244697600E09 +++$+++ I was sorry to see the religious issues start to overtake the scientific importance of Darwin's book. I feel as if that aspect can be discussed in articles with a wider focus. I thought this article was about the book and its publication. If you get into all that, then it seems to me that you do have to discuss Darwin's changing personal views on the issues. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::I was sorry to see the religious issues start to overtake the scientific importance of Darwin's book. I feel as if that aspect can be discussed in articles with a wider focus. I thought this article was about the book and its publication. If you get into all that, then it seems to me that you do have to discuss Darwin's changing personal views on the issues. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:20, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
270230 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270227 +++$+++ 270229 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.244699340E09 +++$+++ In my opinion it worked pretty well shifting the religious aspects of the book itself from the publication section (where there's now just a brief mention) to the ''Religious attitudes'' section, and if anything that's more focussed on the book now. I'm less pleased with the addition of the '50s Roman Catholic position, and the sentence on the \"controversy\" in the ''Modern influence'' section, but both are pretty small in proportion to the article and arose from reviewer's concerns. With a bit of discussion we could look at tightening them further, or possibly removing them but that would have to be well argued against a likely backlash. Will review thinga in the morning. .  +++$+++ :::In my opinion it worked pretty well shifting the religious aspects of the book itself from the publication section (where there's now just a brief mention) to the ''Religious attitudes'' section, and if anything that's more focussed on the book now. I'm less pleased with the addition of the '50s Roman Catholic position, and the sentence on the "controversy" in the ''Modern influence'' section, but both are pretty small in proportion to the article and arose from reviewer's concerns. With a bit of discussion we could look at tightening them further, or possibly removing them but that would have to be well argued against a likely backlash. Will review thinga in the morning. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:49, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
270231 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270227 +++$+++ 270230 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.244700240E09 +++$+++ OK. But it looks like the references are not addressing the impact at the time, but rather are recent evaluations of the impact on a larger scale than just that publication at the time it was published.Initially,  I was elated that the article seemed to be bypassing all of that.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::OK. But it looks like the references are not addressing the impact at the time, but rather are recent evaluations of the impact on a larger scale than just that publication at the time it was published.Initially,  I was elated that the article seemed to be bypassing all of that.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:04, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
270232 +++$+++ Rusty Cashman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270227 +++$+++ 270231 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.244860680E09 +++$+++ I have proposed compromise wording (which I kind of like actually) in response to your last comment on the talk page. I would really like to here your thoughts on it because I agree that you have a point about problems with the text as it is now. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::::: I have proposed compromise wording (which I kind of like actually) in response to your last comment on the talk page. I would really like to here your thoughts on it because I agree that you have a point about problems with the text as it is now. Thanks. [[User:Rusty Cashman|Rusty Cashman]] ([[User talk:Rusty Cashman|talk]]) 19:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
270233 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270227 +++$+++ 270232 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.244882160E09 +++$+++ I have responded on the article talk page. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::I have responded on the article talk page. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:36, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

8085 +++$+++ Iamawesome800 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8085 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-10 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.228902960E09 +++$+++ Now this is really minor, but do you mind using edit summaries so other editors can see what you've done to the page. Thanks!--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE --><font face=\"tahoma\"> +++$+++ Now this is really minor, but do you mind using edit summaries so other editors can see what you've done to the page. Thanks!--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE --><font face="tahoma">[[User:Iamawesome800|'''<span style="background:Green;color:White">Iamawesome</span>''']][[User talk:Iamawesome800|'''<span style="background:Red;color:White">800</span>''']]</font><!-- END --> 01:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
8086 +++$+++ Iamawesome800 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8085 +++$+++ 8085 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.229945940E09 +++$+++ Can you please start using edit summaries if you don't know how to go to [[Help:Edit Summary]].--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE --><font face=\"tahoma\"> +++$+++ :Can you please start using edit summaries if you don't know how to go to [[Help:Edit Summary]].--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE --><font face="tahoma">[[User:Iamawesome800|'''<span style="background:Green;color:White">Iamawesome</span>''']][[User talk:Iamawesome800|'''<span style="background:Red;color:White">800</span>''']]</font><!-- END --> 03:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

532375 +++$+++ Discordance +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-09 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.141949160E09 +++$+++ I know it is, but proof is not universal, most of the world uses ABV, the average person in the UK would have no idea what proof is.  +++$+++ I know it is, but proof is not universal, most of the world uses ABV, the average person in the UK would have no idea what proof is. [[User:Discordance|Discordance]] 16:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
532376 +++$+++ Discordance +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532375 +++$+++ 532375 +++$+++ 2006-03-09 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.141951920E09 +++$+++ Sorry if my edit summary sounded abrupt, in the same way i dont expect the average person in the UK to know what proof is I wouldn't expect you to know that ABV is more understandable abroad. Just one of those things  +++$+++ :Sorry if my edit summary sounded abrupt, in the same way i dont expect the average person in the UK to know what proof is I wouldn't expect you to know that ABV is more understandable abroad. Just one of those things [[User:Discordance|Discordance]] 16:52, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

532377 +++$+++ Thunderbrand +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-10 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.142055900E09 +++$+++ I moved the page. About the adminship thing....I dunno. You have plenty of edits and you are committed to Wikipedia, but I think some people may oppose you. Scanning through some of your past edits, I see little involvement outside of the CVG stuff, and some people would probably want you to do other things before they support you. It would be good to scan the Recent changes to do some vandal hunting and get involved in the AfD process or something similar. I would probably wait maybe a month or two from now, but if you wanted to nominate yourself, I could see you passing the RfA fairly easy, since you have been here a while and as far as I know haven't been in any major conflicts. Just my thoughts.  +++$+++ I moved the page. About the adminship thing....I dunno. You have plenty of edits and you are committed to Wikipedia, but I think some people may oppose you. Scanning through some of your past edits, I see little involvement outside of the CVG stuff, and some people would probably want you to do other things before they support you. It would be good to scan the Recent changes to do some vandal hunting and get involved in the AfD process or something similar. I would probably wait maybe a month or two from now, but if you wanted to nominate yourself, I could see you passing the RfA fairly easy, since you have been here a while and as far as I know haven't been in any major conflicts. Just my thoughts. [[User:Thunderbrand|Thunderbrand]] 21:45, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
532378 +++$+++ Thunderbrand +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532377 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-11 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.142111700E09 +++$+++ When I nominated myself in July of last year, I passed easily even though I didn't do that much outside of the CVG realm (the only other thing I really did was stub sort, and I started to revert vandalism). I think that the standards now are a bit tougher than last year, though. But a lot of people would support you if you look at their [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Standards|Standards]].  +++$+++ ::When I nominated myself in July of last year, I passed easily even though I didn't do that much outside of the CVG realm (the only other thing I really did was stub sort, and I started to revert vandalism). I think that the standards now are a bit tougher than last year, though. But a lot of people would support you if you look at their [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Standards|Standards]]. [[User:Thunderbrand|Thunderbrand]] 13:15, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
532379 +++$+++ Thunderbrand +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532377 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-16 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.142557620E09 +++$+++ I dunno. The only thing I can think of would be to go to some admins who haven't voted and ask them for their input. But that kind of borders on \"ballot stuffing\" so personally I wouldn't.  +++$+++ :::I dunno. The only thing I can think of would be to go to some admins who haven't voted and ask them for their input. But that kind of borders on "ballot stuffing" so personally I wouldn't. [[User:Thunderbrand|Thunderbrand]] 17:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

270234 +++$+++ Nvineeth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-11 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.244763240E09 +++$+++ I know a [[User:Yann|editor]] who is fairly good at handling issues related to copyright, and asked him a [[s:User_talk:Yann#Need_your_opinion|question]]. Hopefully he will get back. Regards,  +++$+++ I know a [[User:Yann|editor]] who is fairly good at handling issues related to copyright, and asked him a [[s:User_talk:Yann#Need_your_opinion|question]]. Hopefully he will get back. Regards, [[User:Nvineeth|Nvineeth]] ([[User talk:Nvineeth|talk]]) 16:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
270235 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270234 +++$+++ 270234 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.244790960E09 +++$+++ OK. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :OK. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:16, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

270236 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-12 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.244859120E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, long time no-see (smile). I have a special request. On June 11th I nominated [[Rafael Carri\xf3n, Sr.]] for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_June_11 DYK] and since it would be my 50th \"DYK\", and as such it would kind-of a milestone in my DYK's, I would like someone like you, who I admire, to look it over. I know it is a silly request, but a fun one at that. Take care.  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, long time no-see (smile). I have a special request. On June 11th I nominated [[Rafael Carrión, Sr.]] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_June_11 DYK] and since it would be my 50th "DYK", and as such it would kind-of a milestone in my DYK's, I would like someone like you, who I admire, to look it over. I know it is a silly request, but a fun one at that. Take care. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 19:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
270237 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270236 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.244859720E09 +++$+++ Do you have a reference that [[Rafael Carri\xf3n, Sr.]] was the founding father, as the reference after the hook doesn't state that. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::Do you have a reference that [[Rafael Carrión, Sr.]] was the founding father, as the reference after the hook doesn't state that. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:22, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
270238 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270236 +++$+++ 270236 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.244862540E09 +++$+++ Done, The book refers to him as the founder, but he was part of a group of founder, therefore I rehrased the hook. The statement \"founding father\" may confuse others. I was using it the same why that the term \"founding father\" is used to describe Washington, Franklin, etc. Do you think that I did the right thing?  +++$+++ *Done, The book refers to him as the founder, but he was part of a group of founder, therefore I rehrased the hook. The statement "founding father" may confuse others. I was using it the same why that the term "founding father" is used to describe Washington, Franklin, etc. Do you think that I did the right thing? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 20:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
270239 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270236 +++$+++ 270238 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.244863140E09 +++$+++ But you need to reference the hook in the article that [[Rafael Carri\xf3n, Sr.]] was a founder. See [[WP:DYKDN|DYK rules D1]] Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :*But you need to reference the hook in the article that [[Rafael Carrión, Sr.]] was a founder. See [[WP:DYKDN|DYK rules D1]] Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
270240 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270236 +++$+++ 270238 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.244864820E09 +++$+++ O.K., now I am confused, because I did add a reference to the hook in the article to that respect. I also added another reference for good measure (smile).  +++$+++ **O.K., now I am confused, because I did add a reference to the hook in the article to that respect. I also added another reference for good measure (smile). [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 20:47, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
270241 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270236 +++$+++ 270240 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.244865060E09 +++$+++ Ok, sorry! It looks fine now. Maybe I forgot to refresh the page. My bad. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::*Ok, sorry! It looks fine now. Maybe I forgot to refresh the page. My bad. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

576386 +++$+++ Neil +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-28 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.204236360E09 +++$+++ Hey MONGO.  Re my [[Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship\/Neil|RFB]]: ''\"Neil is no where near my expectations for crat\"'' - you didn't give any reasoning, so could I ask why?  What are your expectations? Perhaps it's something I can work on. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hey MONGO.  Re my [[Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Neil|RFB]]: ''"Neil is no where near my expectations for crat"'' - you didn't give any reasoning, so could I ask why?  What are your expectations? Perhaps it's something I can work on. Thanks. [[User:Neil|<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#060">Neıl</u>]] [[User_talk:Neil|<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#060">☎</u>]] 14:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
576387 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576386 +++$+++ 576386 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.204236960E09 +++$+++ Almost perfection....in other words, I expect crats to be 10X better than the average admin candidate.-- +++$+++ :Almost perfection....in other words, I expect crats to be 10X better than the average admin candidate.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 14:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
576388 +++$+++ Neil +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576386 +++$+++ 576387 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.204237080E09 +++$+++ That's reasonable, thanks.  So where've I fallen short? Am I only 7X better?  8X? :)  +++$+++ ::That's reasonable, thanks.  So where've I fallen short? Am I only 7X better?  8X? :) [[User:Neil|<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#060">Neıl</u>]] [[User_talk:Neil|<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#060">☎</u>]] 14:18, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
576389 +++$+++ Neil +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576386 +++$+++ 576388 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.204249560E09 +++$+++ And also, if I may ask, why did you \"deeply regret\" supporting my RFA?   +++$+++ :::And also, if I may ask, why did you "deeply regret" supporting my RFA?  [[User:Neil|<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#060">Neıl</u>]] [[User_talk:Neil|<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#060">☎</u>]] 17:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
576390 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576386 +++$+++ 576389 +++$+++ 2008-02-29 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.204295340E09 +++$+++ On a personal note, from my vantage point, most of our interactions have not been the best...maybe this is my fault, and if so, I hope we can find a way to put whatever those issues are behind us.-- +++$+++ ::::On a personal note, from my vantage point, most of our interactions have not been the best...maybe this is my fault, and if so, I hope we can find a way to put whatever those issues are behind us.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 06:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

394565 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394565 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-15 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.200411360E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 07:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
394566 +++$+++ Anthony5429 +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394565 +++$+++ 394565 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.200450600E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the information. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the information. --[[User:Anthony5429|Anthony5429]] ([[User talk:Anthony5429#top|talk]]) 18:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

532385 +++$+++  +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532385 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-19 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.142832060E09 +++$+++ It is with regret that I have to inform you that your request for adminship was unsuccessful on this occasion.  Keep up the good work, and I look forward to seeing a nomination with your name on it in the future. --  +++$+++ It is with regret that I have to inform you that your request for adminship was unsuccessful on this occasion.  Keep up the good work, and I look forward to seeing a nomination with your name on it in the future. -- [[User:Francs2000|Francs]][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Francs2000&amp;action=edit&amp;section=new 2000] [[Image:Gay flag.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] 21:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
532386 +++$+++ Tutmosis +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532385 +++$+++ 532385 +++$+++ 2006-03-20 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.142843160E09 +++$+++ Sorry it didnt work out. Im sure it will work out in the future.  +++$+++ : Sorry it didnt work out. Im sure it will work out in the future. [[User:Tutmosis|Tutmosis]] 00:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

270243 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-10 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.244697780E09 +++$+++ All my FACs have passed, I have nothing near ready, and probably won't until August.-- +++$+++ All my FACs have passed, I have nothing near ready, and probably won't until August.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 22:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
270244 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.244697900E09 +++$+++ Poor you! I can work on your  election article (ugh!) currently lingering  at GAN if that would help. &mdash; +++$+++ :Poor you! I can work on your  election article (ugh!) currently lingering  at GAN if that would help. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:25, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
270245 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ 270244 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.244698440E09 +++$+++ Sure, if you like!  Thanks.-- +++$+++ ::Sure, if you like!  Thanks.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 22:34, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
270246 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ 270245 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.244700360E09 +++$+++ I don't ''like'' but I will, if no one else steps up to the plate. &mdash; +++$+++ :::I don't ''like'' but I will, if no one else steps up to the plate. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:06, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
270247 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ 270246 +++$+++ 2009-06-11 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.244721120E09 +++$+++ Have you actually looked at it, or just judging the book by the title?-- +++$+++ ::::Have you actually looked at it, or just judging the book by the title?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 04:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
270248 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ 270247 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.244790900E09 +++$+++ I actually looked at it. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I actually looked at it. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
270249 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ 270247 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.244816460E09 +++$+++ Oh.  Well, I got Happyme22 to take care of it.  He's a Nixon fan, I gather.  But once this and the 1946 article are done, I'm looking for other projects.  I may go back and take care of [[Helen Douglas]], but as a new bio of her is due out in November, I don't want to deal with that now.  Am considering [[Matthew Boulton]].  Well known, fairly important, lots of source material out there, new bio out next month, neglected article.  Worth doing.  I still want to go back and redo [[Spandau Prison]] to complete the Speer trilogy, but am hampered by a lack of images, diagrams, that kinda thing.-- +++$+++ :::::Oh.  Well, I got Happyme22 to take care of it.  He's a Nixon fan, I gather.  But once this and the 1946 article are done, I'm looking for other projects.  I may go back and take care of [[Helen Douglas]], but as a new bio of her is due out in November, I don't want to deal with that now.  Am considering [[Matthew Boulton]].  Well known, fairly important, lots of source material out there, new bio out next month, neglected article.  Worth doing.  I still want to go back and redo [[Spandau Prison]] to complete the Speer trilogy, but am hampered by a lack of images, diagrams, that kinda thing.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 07:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
270250 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ 270249 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.244859840E09 +++$+++ Any subject but California politics! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::Any subject but California politics! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
270251 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ 270250 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.244868240E09 +++$+++ Frankly, I'm sick and tired of doing most of WikiProject California (of which I'm not a member) FA work and they give me absolutely no help.  And I've asked.  I get no response.  Once I clean up the remaining articles, I'm done with California.  I'd really like to find another Speer or Wolters but they are thin on the ground.-- +++$+++ :::::::Frankly, I'm sick and tired of doing most of WikiProject California (of which I'm not a member) FA work and they give me absolutely no help.  And I've asked.  I get no response.  Once I clean up the remaining articles, I'm done with California.  I'd really like to find another Speer or Wolters but they are thin on the ground.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
270252 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ 270251 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.244868540E09 +++$+++ Why are you doing it then? What about getting  [[Richard Nixon]] to FA status? Or [[Spandau Prison]]? Or any of a bunch of articles that are not FA now? What subjects are you interested in? What about some legal topics? Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::Why are you doing it then? What about getting  [[Richard Nixon]] to FA status? Or [[Spandau Prison]]? Or any of a bunch of articles that are not FA now? What subjects are you interested in? What about some legal topics? Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
270253 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ 270252 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.244873340E09 +++$+++ I've thought about the Nixon article but don't want to step on Happyme22's toes.  I don't know if I want to do a legal article, too much like work.  I'm interested in almost anything, but not all articles interest me.  I suspect the next project will come almost randomly, I'll pick up a book and get interested.  -- +++$+++ :::::::::I've thought about the Nixon article but don't want to step on Happyme22's toes.  I don't know if I want to do a legal article, too much like work.  I'm interested in almost anything, but not all articles interest me.  I suspect the next project will come almost randomly, I'll pick up a book and get interested.  --[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 23:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
270254 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270243 +++$+++ 270253 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.244873580E09 +++$+++ I'm like you. Something has to interest me, and usually the interests appear to come randomly. Plus, like you, I don't particularly like something in my field. I have wide ranging interests, and they have become wider even, due to Wikipedia. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::I'm like you. Something has to interest me, and usually the interests appear to come randomly. Plus, like you, I don't particularly like something in my field. I have wide ranging interests, and they have become wider even, due to Wikipedia. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

532390 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-21 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.142990940E09 +++$+++ First, I haven't violated [[WP:3RR|3RR]].  Secondly, a glance at [[User talk:Gingerfield rocks]], as well as that the Talk pages of many of the articles in question, should answer your questions. -- +++$+++ First, I haven't violated [[WP:3RR|3RR]].  Secondly, a glance at [[User talk:Gingerfield rocks]], as well as that the Talk pages of many of the articles in question, should answer your questions. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 17:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
532391 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532390 +++$+++ 532390 +++$+++ 2006-03-21 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.142992440E09 +++$+++ Given that the month can't be verified, and that it really doesn't matter anyway, I think that we can safely omit it, and leave just the year. -- +++$+++ :Given that the month can't be verified, and that it really doesn't matter anyway, I think that we can safely omit it, and leave just the year. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 17:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

8107 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8107 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-06 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.244348220E09 +++$+++ Please stop re-instating the logos onto this page. Those logos are not the logo of the rivalry, and there's no rationale for there use on that article. Thank you. -- +++$+++ Please stop re-instating the logos onto this page. Those logos are not the logo of the rivalry, and there's no rationale for there use on that article. Thank you. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 21:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
8108 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8107 +++$+++ 8107 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.255641000E09 +++$+++ I wonder, how many times do you plan on restoring the images to [[I-85 Rivalry]] as you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=I-85_Rivalry&action=historysubmit&diff=319891378&oldid=317567703 here] in violation of policy? You've done so three times already, and I've removed them every time. You're wasting your time. -- +++$+++ *I wonder, how many times do you plan on restoring the images to [[I-85 Rivalry]] as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I-85_Rivalry&action=historysubmit&diff=319891378&oldid=317567703 here] in violation of policy? You've done so three times already, and I've removed them every time. You're wasting your time. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 14:10, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
8109 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8107 +++$+++ 8107 +++$+++ 2009-12-07 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.260225360E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Steelers%E2%80%93Ravens_rivalry&action=historysubmit&diff=330207470&oldid=328828521 And again]. Please stop violating policy. Thank you, -- +++$+++ *[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steelers%E2%80%93Ravens_rivalry&action=historysubmit&diff=330207470&oldid=328828521 And again]. Please stop violating policy. Thank you, --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 14:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
8110 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8107 +++$+++ 8107 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.286150880E09 +++$+++ And now you're doing it at [[Steelers\u2013Ravens rivalry]]. -- +++$+++ *And now you're doing it at [[Steelers–Ravens rivalry]]. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 17:08, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
8111 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8107 +++$+++ 8107 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.295044320E09 +++$+++ And again at [[2010 Atlanta Falcons season]]. You've been reverted, again. If you keep on insisting on violating [[WP:NFCC]] #10c, you may find yourself blocked. -- +++$+++ *And again at [[2010 Atlanta Falcons season]]. You've been reverted, again. If you keep on insisting on violating [[WP:NFCC]] #10c, you may find yourself blocked. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 14:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

569330 +++$+++ Hornetman16 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-11 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.165887720E09 +++$+++ What do you mean \"supportive evidence\"? --  +++$+++ What do you mean "supportive evidence"? -- [[User:Hornetman16|Hornetman16]] 17:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
569331 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569330 +++$+++ 569330 +++$+++ 2006-12-11 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.165889040E09 +++$+++ Support'''ING''' evidence, i.e. the 243 edits that you have contributed don't show participation in XfD discussions, assisting on new page\/recent change patrols; vandal warnings and reporting to [[:WP:AIV]]; assisting new users at the Help and Reference Desks; participation in Wikiprojects, etc.  As predicted, your RfA has been closed early.  Take the advice and get some experience before attempting another one in six to eight months' time. Regards,  +++$+++ :Support'''ING''' evidence, i.e. the 243 edits that you have contributed don't show participation in XfD discussions, assisting on new page/recent change patrols; vandal warnings and reporting to [[:WP:AIV]]; assisting new users at the Help and Reference Desks; participation in Wikiprojects, etc.  As predicted, your RfA has been closed early.  Take the advice and get some experience before attempting another one in six to eight months' time. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 18:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

270256 +++$+++ Kathyrncelestewright +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-13 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.244940540E09 +++$+++ Wow! I am so embarassed. I cannot believe I was so negligent with the details of criteria in entering a \"Puss in Boots\" hook at DYK! I've since upgraded the nomination and re-entered it as [[Le Maistre Chat, ou le Chat Bott\xe9 (Puss in Boots)]]. Hope it meets the criteria. Thank you for spotting the original entry's deficiencies in a very timely manner!  +++$+++ Wow! I am so embarassed. I cannot believe I was so negligent with the details of criteria in entering a "Puss in Boots" hook at DYK! I've since upgraded the nomination and re-entered it as [[Le Maistre Chat, ou le Chat Botté (Puss in Boots)]]. Hope it meets the criteria. Thank you for spotting the original entry's deficiencies in a very timely manner! [[User:Kathyrncelestewright|Kathyrncelestewright]] ([[User talk:Kathyrncelestewright|talk]]) 17:49, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
270257 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270256 +++$+++ 270256 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.244941560E09 +++$+++ Article looks much improved. It is easy to overlook important details in the rush to meet the time limits of DYK! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Article looks much improved. It is easy to overlook important details in the rush to meet the time limits of DYK! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

8114 +++$+++ TomCat4680 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8114 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-29 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.254277980E09 +++$+++ Your game summaries are boring and repetitive. Other users agree (see [[Talk:2008_Detroit_Lions_season]]). Please read [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]] before you write more of them.  +++$+++ Your game summaries are boring and repetitive. Other users agree (see [[Talk:2008_Detroit_Lions_season]]). Please read [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]] before you write more of them. [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 19:33, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
8115 +++$+++ TomCat4680 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8114 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-29 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.254282540E09 +++$+++ I wasn't trying to insult you, I was trying to help. Be more creative, don't start and end every summary with the same sentences. Don't say \"he got a touchdown\" say \"he caught a ## yard touchdown pass\" or \"he ran in a touchdown from ## yards out\". Doesn't it sound more interesting that way?  I strongly advise you read the manual of style I linked to above. I also think a thesaurus would be a wise investment for you.  +++$+++ ::I wasn't trying to insult you, I was trying to help. Be more creative, don't start and end every summary with the same sentences. Don't say "he got a touchdown" say "he caught a ## yard touchdown pass" or "he ran in a touchdown from ## yards out". Doesn't it sound more interesting that way?  I strongly advise you read the manual of style I linked to above. I also think a thesaurus would be a wise investment for you. [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 20:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

532403 +++$+++ Dspserpico +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532403 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-18 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.145393460E09 +++$+++ I think your edits the template led to the disabling of the \"free_label\" portion of the template.  Check out [[Delta Sigma Phi]] in which the founders lost ther tag.  I tried to fix it, but I couldn't get it right.  Can you help me out with this?  +++$+++ I think your edits the template led to the disabling of the "free_label" portion of the template.  Check out [[Delta Sigma Phi]] in which the founders lost ther tag.  I tried to fix it, but I couldn't get it right.  Can you help me out with this? [[User:Dspserpico|Dspserpico]] 13:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
532404 +++$+++ Dspserpico +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532403 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.145568600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for fixing the template.  I tried to fix it but ended up just reverting it.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for fixing the template.  I tried to fix it but ended up just reverting it. [[User:Dspserpico|Dspserpico]] 14:30, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

270260 +++$+++ Cyclonebiskit +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-13 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.244951880E09 +++$+++ {{talkback|Talk:Effects of Hurricane Georges in Louisiana\/GA1}}  +++$+++ {{talkback|Talk:Effects of Hurricane Georges in Louisiana/GA1}} [[User:Cyclonebiskit|Cyclonebiskit]] ([[User talk:Cyclonebiskit|talk]]) 20:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
270261 +++$+++ Cyclonebiskit +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270260 +++$+++ 270260 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.244953020E09 +++$+++ I think I've expanded the lead enough now.  +++$+++ :I think I've expanded the lead enough now. [[User:Cyclonebiskit|Cyclonebiskit]] ([[User talk:Cyclonebiskit|talk]]) 21:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
270262 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270260 +++$+++ 270261 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.244956800E09 +++$+++ Done!  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::Done!  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

532405 +++$+++ Vic Vipr +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532405 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-24 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.145930460E09 +++$+++ I wanted to tell you that I have been poking an awful lot at all related articles recently in an effort to address the many inconsistencies that once were, some cleaning up, factual errors etc. Anyway, just letting you know so it doesn't come as a complete shock or anything! Cheers - +++$+++ I wanted to tell you that I have been poking an awful lot at all related articles recently in an effort to address the many inconsistencies that once were, some cleaning up, factual errors etc. Anyway, just letting you know so it doesn't come as a complete shock or anything! Cheers -[[User:Vic Vipr|Vic Vipr]] 19:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
532406 +++$+++ Vic Vipr +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532405 +++$+++ 532405 +++$+++ 2006-04-26 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.146080640E09 +++$+++ When I'm not [[User_talk:Eliashc#Dont_be_discouraged|reaching out]] I am looking at the [[Gradius series]] page and thinking of expanding it with a Bacterion section, which, as you know, is the opposing force. But this encompasses Core Warships and perhaps parts of Final Bosses, any ideas where to put it? &ndash; +++$+++ :When I'm not [[User_talk:Eliashc#Dont_be_discouraged|reaching out]] I am looking at the [[Gradius series]] page and thinking of expanding it with a Bacterion section, which, as you know, is the opposing force. But this encompasses Core Warships and perhaps parts of Final Bosses, any ideas where to put it? &ndash;[[User:Vic Vipr|Vic Vipr]] 12:44, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
532407 +++$+++ Vic Vipr +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532405 +++$+++ 532405 +++$+++ 2006-04-28 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.146258960E09 +++$+++ Hey, you're unbanned! Anyway, Gradius Gaiden shows up in Galaxies introductory sequence, shouldn't it be moved back up in the template? - +++$+++ :Hey, you're unbanned! Anyway, Gradius Gaiden shows up in Galaxies introductory sequence, shouldn't it be moved back up in the template? -[[User:Vic Vipr|Vic Vipr]] 14:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
532408 +++$+++ Vic Vipr +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532405 +++$+++ 532407 +++$+++ 2006-04-28 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.146264120E09 +++$+++ Actually, I was referring to [[:Template:Gradius series]] :) - +++$+++ ::Actually, I was referring to [[:Template:Gradius series]] :) -[[User:Vic Vipr|Vic Vipr]] 15:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
532409 +++$+++ Vic Vipr +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532405 +++$+++ 532405 +++$+++ 2006-05-02 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.146588720E09 +++$+++ [[User:Vic_Vipr\/Gradius#Timeline|Timeline]] as requested (a bit rough though). - +++$+++ :[[User:Vic_Vipr/Gradius#Timeline|Timeline]] as requested (a bit rough though). -[[User:Vic Vipr|Vic Vipr]] 09:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
532410 +++$+++ Vic Vipr +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532405 +++$+++ 532408 +++$+++ 2006-05-02 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.146603840E09 +++$+++ I don't believe I have seen one before, got any examples? - +++$+++ :::I don't believe I have seen one before, got any examples? -[[User:Vic Vipr|Vic Vipr]] 14:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
532411 +++$+++ larsinio +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532405 +++$+++ 532410 +++$+++ 2006-05-02 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.146605640E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Template:Timeline_FPS_games Here] and  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Template:Timeline_US_Presidents_2 here] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Template:Timeline_History_of_Computing here] and many more here http:\/\/meta.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Help:EasyTimeline_examples. I dont know whether horizontal or vertical would be better. Also shoudl we combine parodius and gradiu sstuff into one article? Whatever we do we should start applying this to all series pages. --'''<font color=\"LimeGreen\"> +++$+++ ::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Timeline_FPS_games Here] and  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Timeline_US_Presidents_2 here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Timeline_History_of_Computing here] and many more here http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:EasyTimeline_examples. I dont know whether horizontal or vertical would be better. Also shoudl we combine parodius and gradiu sstuff into one article? Whatever we do we should start applying this to all series pages. --'''<font color="LimeGreen">[[User:larsinio|larsinio]]</font>''' [[User talk:larsinio|(<font color="orange">poke</font>)]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/larsinio|(<font color="DodgerBlue">prod</font>)]]</sup> 14:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

8119 +++$+++ TomCat4680 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8119 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-05 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.254800760E09 +++$+++ Please keep the conversations on your page for better flow, and use the <nowiki>{{Talkback}}<\/nowiki> template to let me know you responded here. Its easier than switching back and forth between pages. The instructions on how to use it are on the top of my talk page.  +++$+++ Please keep the conversations on your page for better flow, and use the <nowiki>{{Talkback}}</nowiki> template to let me know you responded here. Its easier than switching back and forth between pages. The instructions on how to use it are on the top of my talk page. [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 20:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
8120 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8119 +++$+++ 8119 +++$+++ 2009-10-07 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.254968880E09 +++$+++ Seriously, if you can't write good summaries, don't write any at all.\u25ba''' +++$+++ :Seriously, if you can't write good summaries, don't write any at all.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 19:28, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
8121 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8119 +++$+++ 8120 +++$+++ 2009-10-07 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.254969300E09 +++$+++ Did you ever stop to think there's a reason you constantly get crap for your summaries? It's because they aren't good. They are poorly written, use biased language and are ridiculously repetitive and formulaic. Not trying to be mean, but seriously - if you can't write a good summary, leave it to someone else.\u25ba''' +++$+++ ::Did you ever stop to think there's a reason you constantly get crap for your summaries? It's because they aren't good. They are poorly written, use biased language and are ridiculously repetitive and formulaic. Not trying to be mean, but seriously - if you can't write a good summary, leave it to someone else.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 19:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

569332 +++$+++ Krasniy +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-11 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.165889460E09 +++$+++ Hi there, thanks for adopting me! What's the best way to communicate with you when I have questions and such? IM, email, talk pages, or probably anything else works for me. \u2248 +++$+++ Hi there, thanks for adopting me! What's the best way to communicate with you when I have questions and such? IM, email, talk pages, or probably anything else works for me. ≈[[User:Krasniy|<span style="color: rgb(130, 0,0);">Krasniy</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Krasniy|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Krasniy|contribs]])</sup> 18:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
569333 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569332 +++$+++ 569332 +++$+++ 2006-12-11 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.165903500E09 +++$+++ A message on my Talk page when you have a question or issue will be enough for me, thanks! I look forward to working with you soon.  +++$+++ :A message on my Talk page when you have a question or issue will be enough for me, thanks! I look forward to working with you soon. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

482898 +++$+++ Flubeca +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.183546140E09 +++$+++ We had a serial vandaliser (making a blanking per like 30 seconds) and a minute after he was posted, you banned him. Thank you for saving an article. - +++$+++ We had a serial vandaliser (making a blanking per like 30 seconds) and a minute after he was posted, you banned him. Thank you for saving an article. -[[User:Flubeca|<span style="color:green;font-weight:bold;">Flubeca</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Flubeca|<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 03:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
482899 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482898 +++$+++ 482898 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.183546200E09 +++$+++ Glad I could help.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Glad I could help.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

8124 +++$+++ TomCat4680 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8124 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-08 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.257679860E09 +++$+++ Please be advised that per consensus [[WP:MOSTM|manual of style of trademarks]], that it is written here as Fox, NOT FOX.  +++$+++ Please be advised that per consensus [[WP:MOSTM|manual of style of trademarks]], that it is written here as Fox, NOT FOX. [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 03:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
8125 +++$+++ TomCat4680 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8124 +++$+++ 8124 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.258038780E09 +++$+++ Hello, what part of that did you not understand? STOP writing it FOX. We write it Fox here.  +++$+++ :Hello, what part of that did you not understand? STOP writing it FOX. We write it Fox here. [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 07:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

532414 +++$+++ Vic Vipr +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532414 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-17 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.147915200E09 +++$+++ Not sure about Solar, there's so little info about them but I reckon Revised is an official title. I've actually thought about these other remakes too, a part of me wants them separate purely for convenience (including Life Force). Though the template is getting sort of crowded... ~  +++$+++ Not sure about Solar, there's so little info about them but I reckon Revised is an official title. I've actually thought about these other remakes too, a part of me wants them separate purely for convenience (including Life Force). Though the template is getting sort of crowded... ~ [[User:Vic Vipr|Vic Vipr]] 18:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
532415 +++$+++ Vic Vipr +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532414 +++$+++ 532414 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.148091540E09 +++$+++ Do you think the intro weapons and tech chapters of [[Vic Viper]] are acceptable in their current form? I was wondering if we should move the cleanup tag further down the page. Oh, and also, would you agree to move Life Force out of Salamander as well? I suppose it's not an immediate necessity but I don't want to proceed without backing. Cheers ~  +++$+++ :Do you think the intro weapons and tech chapters of [[Vic Viper]] are acceptable in their current form? I was wondering if we should move the cleanup tag further down the page. Oh, and also, would you agree to move Life Force out of Salamander as well? I suppose it's not an immediate necessity but I don't want to proceed without backing. Cheers ~ [[User:Vic Vipr|Vic Vipr]] 19:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

8127 +++$+++ Highway99 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-08 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.255004760E09 +++$+++ Others and myself have asked you this before, but I'll reiterate it again. When adding game summaries, please don't add the RT and HT tags to [[Template:Linescore Amfootball]], as you've been doing on [[2009 New York Jets season]]. The template does not need those tags to display the totals for each team. -- +++$+++ Others and myself have asked you this before, but I'll reiterate it again. When adding game summaries, please don't add the RT and HT tags to [[Template:Linescore Amfootball]], as you've been doing on [[2009 New York Jets season]]. The template does not need those tags to display the totals for each team. --[[User:Highway99|Highway99]] ([[User talk:Highway99|talk]]) 05:26, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
8128 +++$+++ The Arbiter +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8127 +++$+++ 8127 +++$+++ 2009-11-02 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.257204120E09 +++$+++ Indianapolis did NOT take the lead with Stover's field goal. That score made it 14-12, San Francisco.  +++$+++ *Indianapolis did NOT take the lead with Stover's field goal. That score made it 14-12, San Francisco. [[user:The Arbiter|<span style='color: #FFFFFF;background-color: #191970;'>'''''The Arbiter'''''</span>]][[user talk:The Arbiter|'''<span style='color: #B20000;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup></span>''']] 15:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

613024 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-12 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.202820300E09 +++$+++ Hello, '''Dave souza'''. You've blocked ELNUMERO1 before due to [[User talk:ELNUMERO1#Your .22race.22 issue|his or her \"race\" issue]]. I must state that it has become apparent that this user will not stop his or her damaging edits, and needs to be blocked permanently. All one needs to do is look at this user's contributions, and how he or she took right back to damaging Wikipedia as soon as his or her block expired. Any further assistance you can provide in ridding this \"editor\" from Wikipedia would be much appreciated.  +++$+++ Hello, '''Dave souza'''. You've blocked ELNUMERO1 before due to [[User talk:ELNUMERO1#Your .22race.22 issue|his or her "race" issue]]. I must state that it has become apparent that this user will not stop his or her damaging edits, and needs to be blocked permanently. All one needs to do is look at this user's contributions, and how he or she took right back to damaging Wikipedia as soon as his or her block expired. Any further assistance you can provide in ridding this "editor" from Wikipedia would be much appreciated. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 04:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
613025 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613024 +++$+++ 613024 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.202832000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up. I've no problem with his or her \"race\" issue, but removal of information without good reason and discussion when it's reverted is vandalism, and leads to escalating blocks as you suggest. If there's no improvement the point will be reached where an indefinite block as a vandal only account will be appropriate, but to some extent it's a content dispute so I'm not rushing. ..  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up. I've no problem with his or her "race" issue, but removal of information without good reason and discussion when it's reverted is vandalism, and leads to escalating blocks as you suggest. If there's no improvement the point will be reached where an indefinite block as a vandal only account will be appropriate, but to some extent it's a content dispute so I'm not rushing. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 08:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
613026 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613024 +++$+++ 613025 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.202879340E09 +++$+++ Okay, thank you for your help, Dave (don't know if you mind me calling you Dave, but thanks again).  +++$+++ ::Okay, thank you for your help, Dave (don't know if you mind me calling you Dave, but thanks again). [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 21:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

8130 +++$+++  +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-03 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.259903400E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia{{#if:Cato June|, as you did to [[:Cato June]],}} without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please make use of the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia{{#if:Cato June|, as you did to [[:Cato June]],}} without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please make use of the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 21:10, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
8131 +++$+++  +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8130 +++$+++ 8130 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.259904660E09 +++$+++ It is not that your writing is a sin. You removed [[WP:ALT]] text and other content from the article.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :It is not that your writing is a sin. You removed [[WP:ALT]] text and other content from the article.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 21:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

525643 +++$+++ Icek +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-17 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.208428020E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, regarding 'your' article on [[cladinose]], I think the classification as \"hexose deoxy sugar\" is clearly wrong, it would be rather something like \"methyl ether of a branched heptose dideoxy sugar\" but I'm not sure how chemists usually refer to such substances. Could you shed light on the issure?  +++$+++ Hi Arcadian, regarding 'your' article on [[cladinose]], I think the classification as "hexose deoxy sugar" is clearly wrong, it would be rather something like "methyl ether of a branched heptose dideoxy sugar" but I'm not sure how chemists usually refer to such substances. Could you shed light on the issure? [[User:Icek|Icek]] ([[User talk:Icek|talk]]) 03:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
525644 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525643 +++$+++ 525643 +++$+++ 2008-04-17 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.208428800E09 +++$+++ I was following the [http:\/\/www.nlm.nih.gov\/cgi\/mesh\/2008\/MB_cgi?mode=&term=Cladinose guidance] provided by [[MeSH]]. I don't object to your proposed change, but if you are looking for more details on naming standards, the good people at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry]] would probably be able to help you more than I could. -- +++$+++ :I was following the [http://www.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/mesh/2008/MB_cgi?mode=&term=Cladinose guidance] provided by [[MeSH]]. I don't object to your proposed change, but if you are looking for more details on naming standards, the good people at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry]] would probably be able to help you more than I could. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 03:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

532420 +++$+++ ed_g2s +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-12 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.147476360E09 +++$+++ is already quite clear on the matter. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana;\"> +++$+++ is already quite clear on the matter. <span style="font-family: Verdana;">[[User:ed_g2s|ed g2s]] &bull; [[User talk:ed_g2s|talk]]</span> 16:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
532421 +++$+++ ed_g2s +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532420 +++$+++ 532420 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.147476660E09 +++$+++ Because we shouldn't be justifying our copyright violations by finding loopholes, but instead trying to provide free content where available, and resorting to copyright material as a last resort. As it stands, there is no justification for these galleries. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana;\"> +++$+++ :Because we shouldn't be justifying our copyright violations by finding loopholes, but instead trying to provide free content where available, and resorting to copyright material as a last resort. As it stands, there is no justification for these galleries. <span style="font-family: Verdana;">[[User:ed_g2s|ed g2s]] &bull; [[User talk:ed_g2s|talk]]</span> 16:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
532422 +++$+++ larsinio +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532420 +++$+++ 532421 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.147476720E09 +++$+++ Were not finding loopholes, were trying to adequately explain a topic. the CVG space depends oupon fair use, there is no free content when itcopmes to screenshots. And its an open issue, which is not settled. can you just temporarily hault all until there is a community consensus? --'''<font color=\"LimeGreen\"> +++$+++ ::Were not finding loopholes, were trying to adequately explain a topic. the CVG space depends oupon fair use, there is no free content when itcopmes to screenshots. And its an open issue, which is not settled. can you just temporarily hault all until there is a community consensus? --'''<font color="LimeGreen">[[User:larsinio|larsinio]]</font>''' [[User talk:larsinio|(<font color="orange">poke</font>)]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/larsinio|(<font color="DodgerBlue">prod</font>)]]</sup> 16:32, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
532423 +++$+++ larsinio +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532420 +++$+++ 532421 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.147476960E09 +++$+++ Furthermore it is your opinion that the jsutification given is just a way to \"cheat\" the system. I personalyl do not think you have enough information about the CVG aspect to this to justify what is and what is not fair use. \"Fair use, ill know it when i see it\" right, something like that? --'''<font color=\"LimeGreen\"> +++$+++ ::Furthermore it is your opinion that the jsutification given is just a way to "cheat" the system. I personalyl do not think you have enough information about the CVG aspect to this to justify what is and what is not fair use. "Fair use, ill know it when i see it" right, something like that? --'''<font color="LimeGreen">[[User:larsinio|larsinio]]</font>''' [[User talk:larsinio|(<font color="orange">poke</font>)]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/larsinio|(<font color="DodgerBlue">prod</font>)]]</sup> 16:36, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
532424 +++$+++ ed_g2s +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532420 +++$+++ 532423 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.147477080E09 +++$+++ We need to err on the side of caution. Images should not be on a page until we are sure they are allowed. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana;\"> +++$+++ :::We need to err on the side of caution. Images should not be on a page until we are sure they are allowed. <span style="font-family: Verdana;">[[User:ed_g2s|ed g2s]] &bull; [[User talk:ed_g2s|talk]]</span> 16:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
532425 +++$+++ larsinio +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532420 +++$+++ 532424 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.147477500E09 +++$+++ 1) this is not the german wikipedia, 2) a game article without a screenshot showing it is usless IMO. 3) It is established that CVG screenshots are valid type of fair use material. 4) The question is do you think screenshots are useful in explaining the capabil.iteis of a video game console? If the answer is yes then the effort shoudl be focused on not mass deleting, but on implementing the images in teh proper manner; i.e. contextual references and fair use rationale--'''<font color=\"LimeGreen\"> +++$+++ ::::1) this is not the german wikipedia, 2) a game article without a screenshot showing it is usless IMO. 3) It is established that CVG screenshots are valid type of fair use material. 4) The question is do you think screenshots are useful in explaining the capabil.iteis of a video game console? If the answer is yes then the effort shoudl be focused on not mass deleting, but on implementing the images in teh proper manner; i.e. contextual references and fair use rationale--'''<font color="LimeGreen">[[User:larsinio|larsinio]]</font>''' [[User talk:larsinio|(<font color="orange">poke</font>)]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/larsinio|(<font color="DodgerBlue">prod</font>)]]</sup> 16:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
532426 +++$+++ ed_g2s +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532420 +++$+++ 532425 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.147477620E09 +++$+++ #They are useful, but a large gallery of them is not fair use. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana;\"> +++$+++ :::::#They are useful, but a large gallery of them is not fair use. <span style="font-family: Verdana;">[[User:ed_g2s|ed g2s]] &bull; [[User talk:ed_g2s|talk]]</span> 16:47, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
532427 +++$+++ larsinio +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532420 +++$+++ 532424 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.147478040E09 +++$+++ Granted some of the galleries are large, but 4-8 screenshots is not what i consider large, specially if keepin in context its a system that has hundreds of games over several years. --'''<font color=\"LimeGreen\"> +++$+++ ::::Granted some of the galleries are large, but 4-8 screenshots is not what i consider large, specially if keepin in context its a system that has hundreds of games over several years. --'''<font color="LimeGreen">[[User:larsinio|larsinio]]</font>''' [[User talk:larsinio|(<font color="orange">poke</font>)]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/larsinio|(<font color="DodgerBlue">prod</font>)]]</sup> 16:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
532428 +++$+++ ed_g2s +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532420 +++$+++ 532427 +++$+++ 2006-05-12 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.147493580E09 +++$+++ As is already said on [[Template:game-screenshot]], \"''[the image may be used] for identification and critical commentary on the computer or video game in question or''\". And this does not mean that we should shoehorn in some commentary just so we can continue to use the image. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana;\"> +++$+++ :::::As is already said on [[Template:game-screenshot]], "''[the image may be used] for identification and critical commentary on the computer or video game in question or''". And this does not mean that we should shoehorn in some commentary just so we can continue to use the image. <span style="font-family: Verdana;">[[User:ed_g2s|ed g2s]] &bull; [[User talk:ed_g2s|talk]]</span> 21:13, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

270277 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270277 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-16 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.245217800E09 +++$+++ Ciao Mattisse, good to hear from you again.Sorry I have taken so long to reply to your message, I am travelling with little internet access until the 20th. If it's not to much trouble to off finishing up the [[Talk:Golos Truda\/GA1|GA review]] for the ''[[Golos Truda]]'' article until next week I would be most appreciative. Thanks for your work so far. Mahalo,  +++$+++ Ciao Mattisse, good to hear from you again.Sorry I have taken so long to reply to your message, I am travelling with little internet access until the 20th. If it's not to much trouble to off finishing up the [[Talk:Golos Truda/GA1|GA review]] for the ''[[Golos Truda]]'' article until next week I would be most appreciative. Thanks for your work so far. Mahalo, [[user:|<span style="background: #222; color: #fff;"><font face="Goudy Old Style">&nbsp;Skomorokh&nbsp;</font></span>]] 22:50, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
270278 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270277 +++$+++ 270277 +++$+++ 2009-06-16 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.245218340E09 +++$+++ That's fine. No hurry.  Enjoy yourself! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :That's fine. No hurry.  Enjoy yourself! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

270279 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270279 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-17 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.245274680E09 +++$+++ Come look at the progress.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ Come look at the progress.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 14:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
270280 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270279 +++$+++ 270279 +++$+++ 2009-06-17 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.245280500E09 +++$+++ I have added more comments. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I have added more comments. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
270281 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270279 +++$+++ 270280 +++$+++ 2009-06-17 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.245293580E09 +++$+++ I have replied.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::I have replied.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 19:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
270282 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270279 +++$+++ 270281 +++$+++ 2009-06-17 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.245297780E09 +++$+++ Further guidance would be appreciated.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::Further guidance would be appreciated.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 21:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
270283 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270279 +++$+++ 270282 +++$+++ 2009-06-17 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.245299760E09 +++$+++ I suggest that you look at other political biographies. The reviewer of GA1 suggested a couple and I suggested one in GA2. Another is [[Ron Paul]] which is more strictly political in content, but you can see how it is more that just a listing of his political activities. If you want, I can ask for a second opinion from someone like Malleus.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I suggest that you look at other political biographies. The reviewer of GA1 suggested a couple and I suggested one in GA2. Another is [[Ron Paul]] which is more strictly political in content, but you can see how it is more that just a listing of his political activities. If you want, I can ask for a second opinion from someone like Malleus.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

8137 +++$+++ Muboshgu +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-27 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.285636080E09 +++$+++ Are you the editor who keeps writing \"would\" on [[2010 New York Jets season]]?  Please be mindful of your use of \"would\" as it's not grammatically appropriate. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Are you the editor who keeps writing "would" on [[2010 New York Jets season]]?  Please be mindful of your use of "would" as it's not grammatically appropriate. Thanks. --[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu|talk]]) 18:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
8138 +++$+++ Muboshgu +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8137 +++$+++ 8137 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.286163120E09 +++$+++ I asked you to stop typing \"would\" on these articles.  It's not proper grammar. -- +++$+++ :I asked you to stop typing "would" on these articles.  It's not proper grammar. --[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu|talk]]) 20:32, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

549980 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 549980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-02 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.151890380E09 +++$+++ ''But, his actions to prevent radical Serbian nationalists are... well... hard for me to find.'' Please refer to my swift protection of [[Dalmatia]], [[Tourism of Croatia]] and similiar Croat-related articles that were contiously being pushed with Serbian nationalist POV. Also, see the [[Rudjer Boskovic]] article and open its history (note my last edits). I have made a balanced compromise - Rudjer Boskovic was being invaded for ages by Serbian POV (including from my own brother's). One funny thing is that I ''haven't'' combated Albanian nationalism as much as you presented. :) ALl the things that I did was to \"restore to the light\" a little <not intending to insult the User in subject> - but now a good contributor - [[User:Ilir_pz]]. -- +++$+++ ''But, his actions to prevent radical Serbian nationalists are... well... hard for me to find.'' Please refer to my swift protection of [[Dalmatia]], [[Tourism of Croatia]] and similiar Croat-related articles that were contiously being pushed with Serbian nationalist POV. Also, see the [[Rudjer Boskovic]] article and open its history (note my last edits). I have made a balanced compromise - Rudjer Boskovic was being invaded for ages by Serbian POV (including from my own brother's). One funny thing is that I ''haven't'' combated Albanian nationalism as much as you presented. :) ALl the things that I did was to "restore to the light" a little <not intending to insult the User in subject> - but now a good contributor - [[User:Ilir_pz]]. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 18:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
549981 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 549980 +++$+++ 549980 +++$+++ 2006-07-02 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.151890860E09 +++$+++ And essentially - when I edit articles, I deal strictly with bot-like translations from books, encyclopediae, or the Croatian or Serbian wikipedias. This means that my edits ''must seem POV'' - see for instance [[Serbian Lands]], an article translated from the Serbian wikipedia. However, I have ''no intention'' of enforcing the POV that stands there - and always pull the discussion to the talk page when I am interested in discussing. -- +++$+++ : And essentially - when I edit articles, I deal strictly with bot-like translations from books, encyclopediae, or the Croatian or Serbian wikipedias. This means that my edits ''must seem POV'' - see for instance [[Serbian Lands]], an article translated from the Serbian wikipedia. However, I have ''no intention'' of enforcing the POV that stands there - and always pull the discussion to the talk page when I am interested in discussing. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 18:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

569335 +++$+++ Fang Aili +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569335 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-11 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.165892640E09 +++$+++ Hello. I see from the admin coaching [[Wikipedia:Esperanza\/Admin coaching\/Status|status page]] that you (along with The Gerg, who is retired) were coaching [[User:SP-KP]]. Did that ever get off the ground? If you're not actively coaching someone, would you like a new student? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hello. I see from the admin coaching [[Wikipedia:Esperanza/Admin coaching/Status|status page]] that you (along with The Gerg, who is retired) were coaching [[User:SP-KP]]. Did that ever get off the ground? If you're not actively coaching someone, would you like a new student? Thanks, [[User:Fang Aili|Fang Aili]] <sup>[[User talk:Fang Aili|<font color="green">talk</font>]]</sup> 19:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
569336 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569335 +++$+++ 569335 +++$+++ 2006-12-11 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.165909860E09 +++$+++ It didn't get off of the ground, what with my associate coach retiring and all of the vandalfighting I've been doing lately.  If you have another candidate who would like some guidance then please do let me know!  +++$+++ :It didn't get off of the ground, what with my associate coach retiring and all of the vandalfighting I've been doing lately.  If you have another candidate who would like some guidance then please do let me know! [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
569337 +++$+++ Fang Aili +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569335 +++$+++ 569336 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.165979460E09 +++$+++ I've asked SP-KP if he would like to restart coaching; if he doesn't respond in a few weeks we can move on to another student. :) -- +++$+++ ::I've asked SP-KP if he would like to restart coaching; if he doesn't respond in a few weeks we can move on to another student. :) --[[User:Fang Aili|Fang Aili]] <sup>[[User talk:Fang Aili|<font color="green">talk</font>]]</sup> 19:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

270284 +++$+++ Cyclonebiskit +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270284 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-17 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.245290460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the review, I've replied to all your comments.  +++$+++ Thanks for the review, I've replied to all your comments. [[User:Cyclonebiskit|Cyclonebiskit]] ([[User talk:Cyclonebiskit|talk]]) 19:01, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
270285 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270284 +++$+++ 270284 +++$+++ 2009-06-17 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.245291300E09 +++$+++ Ok, will look! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Ok, will look! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

532429 +++$+++ Vic Vipr +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532429 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-15 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.147727760E09 +++$+++ A point was recently raised on WP:CVG talk [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Computer_and_video_games#coverart_or_screenshot_for_infoboxes.3F] that there is a consensus to use cover art instead of titlescreens or other screenshots in the infobox. However, I'm personally a bit peeved in terms of arcade games where cover art for ports do not always accurately represent the arcade game, taking alterations into account such as visuals that have been scaled down or mechanics changed to accomodate the target platform etc. Could you take a moment to give your opinion on the matter? ~  +++$+++ A point was recently raised on WP:CVG talk [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Computer_and_video_games#coverart_or_screenshot_for_infoboxes.3F] that there is a consensus to use cover art instead of titlescreens or other screenshots in the infobox. However, I'm personally a bit peeved in terms of arcade games where cover art for ports do not always accurately represent the arcade game, taking alterations into account such as visuals that have been scaled down or mechanics changed to accomodate the target platform etc. Could you take a moment to give your opinion on the matter? ~ [[User:Vic Vipr|Vic Vipr]] 14:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
532430 +++$+++ Vic Vipr +++$+++ Larsinio +++$+++ 532429 +++$+++ 532429 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 09:25:00 +++$+++ 1.147883100E09 +++$+++ There does appear to be a consensus regarding use of cover art for infobox images, though for the Template:Infobox CVG variety, but not for Template:Infobox Arcade Game so the arcade titles can be left as they are. Though I'm considering adding cover art for some of the console-only releases for compliance. ~  +++$+++ :There does appear to be a consensus regarding use of cover art for infobox images, though for the Template:Infobox CVG variety, but not for Template:Infobox Arcade Game so the arcade titles can be left as they are. Though I'm considering adding cover art for some of the console-only releases for compliance. ~ [[User:Vic Vipr|Vic Vipr]] 09:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

525645 +++$+++ Lisa4edit +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-19 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.208610120E09 +++$+++ Sorry for bothering you, glad if you could help out. Thanks. --[[User:Lisa4edit|Lisa4edit]] ([[User talk:Lisa4edit|talk]]) 03:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)oops-- +++$+++ Sorry for bothering you, glad if you could help out. Thanks. --[[User:Lisa4edit|Lisa4edit]] ([[User talk:Lisa4edit|talk]]) 03:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)oops--[[User:Lisa4edit|Lisa4edit]] ([[User talk:Lisa4edit|talk]]) 06:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
525646 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525645 +++$+++ 525645 +++$+++ 2008-04-21 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.208762160E09 +++$+++ I'd be happy to work with you, and working section-by-section would probably be best. First, if you haven't yet, please read [[Wikipedia:Five pillars]], [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]], [[Wikipedia:External links]], and [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)]]. Then, start adding content, but since you are a new user, it would be better to add it relatively slowly, to help facilitate collaboration. If you have specific questions, of course I'd be happy to answer them, but I'll bet after reading the four links above you'll have a good sense of how to move forward. -- +++$+++ :I'd be happy to work with you, and working section-by-section would probably be best. First, if you haven't yet, please read [[Wikipedia:Five pillars]], [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]], [[Wikipedia:External links]], and [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles)]]. Then, start adding content, but since you are a new user, it would be better to add it relatively slowly, to help facilitate collaboration. If you have specific questions, of course I'd be happy to answer them, but I'll bet after reading the four links above you'll have a good sense of how to move forward. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 00:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

270288 +++$+++ Shimgray +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-17 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.245302100E09 +++$+++ If you do have anything else to bring up, I'd be more than happy to have a go at it, but I'm going to be away until Saturday evening, so I can't promise I'll be able to do anything useful before then!  +++$+++ If you do have anything else to bring up, I'd be more than happy to have a go at it, but I'm going to be away until Saturday evening, so I can't promise I'll be able to do anything useful before then! [[User:Shimgray|Shimgray]] | [[User talk:Shimgray|talk]] | 22:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
270289 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270288 +++$+++ 270288 +++$+++ 2009-06-17 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.245302280E09 +++$+++ I think my concerns have been addressed. Nice article.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I think my concerns have been addressed. Nice article.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
270290 +++$+++ Shimgray +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270288 +++$+++ 270289 +++$+++ 2009-06-17 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.245303180E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Thanks! [[User:Shimgray|Shimgray]] | [[User talk:Shimgray|talk]] | 22:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

8145 +++$+++ Paine Ellsworth +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8145 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-07 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.302181440E09 +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:King Arthur (film)]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> &ndash;&nbsp;<font color=\"darkblue\" face=\"Ariel\"> +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:King Arthur (film)]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> &ndash;&nbsp;<font color="darkblue" face="Ariel">[[User:Paine Ellsworth|Paine&nbsp;Ellsworth]]</font>&nbsp;(&nbsp;<font color="blue" face="Ariel">[[User talk:Paine Ellsworth|C<small>LIMAX</small>]]</font>&nbsp;)&nbsp; 06:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
8146 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8145 +++$+++ 8145 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.302222900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Alakazam|Alakazam]] ([[User talk:Alakazam|talk]]) 17:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
8147 +++$+++ Paine Ellsworth +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8145 +++$+++ 8146 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.302555540E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure, though, that you understand that, in the case of [[King Arthur (film)|King Arthur]], you linked to the wrong movie at Rotten Tomatoes.  Did you get that? &ndash;&nbsp;<font color=\"darkblue\" face=\"Ariel\"> +++$+++ ::I'm not sure, though, that you understand that, in the case of [[King Arthur (film)|King Arthur]], you linked to the wrong movie at Rotten Tomatoes.  Did you get that? &ndash;&nbsp;<font color="darkblue" face="Ariel">[[User:Paine Ellsworth|Paine&nbsp;Ellsworth]]</font>&nbsp;(&nbsp;<font color="blue" face="Ariel">[[User talk:Paine Ellsworth|C<small>LIMAX</small>]]</font>&nbsp;)&nbsp; 13:59, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
8148 +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8145 +++$+++ 8147 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.302559260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Alakazam|Alakazam]] ([[User talk:Alakazam|talk]]) 15:01, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
8149 +++$+++ Paine Ellsworth +++$+++ Alakazam +++$+++ 8145 +++$+++ 8148 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.302647100E09 +++$+++ \"What doesn't kill us makes us stronger!\" <grin>  So sorry for the vandalism thing.  It would also greatly help in the future if you would remember to leave a brief [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] when you make alterations to a page, which you forgot to do in the [[King Arthur (film)|King Arthur]] article.  This helps other editors when they bring up the article's history, and it makes it less likely that your good edits will be mistaken for vandalism.  Also, please get in the habit of responding on your Talk page rather than on my Talk page.  I watch the Talk pages where I leave notices, and the jumping around can be very confusing.  Best to you! &ndash;&nbsp;<font color=\"darkblue\" face=\"Ariel\"> +++$+++ ::::"What doesn't kill us makes us stronger!" <grin>  So sorry for the vandalism thing.  It would also greatly help in the future if you would remember to leave a brief [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] when you make alterations to a page, which you forgot to do in the [[King Arthur (film)|King Arthur]] article.  This helps other editors when they bring up the article's history, and it makes it less likely that your good edits will be mistaken for vandalism.  Also, please get in the habit of responding on your Talk page rather than on my Talk page.  I watch the Talk pages where I leave notices, and the jumping around can be very confusing.  Best to you! &ndash;&nbsp;<font color="darkblue" face="Ariel">[[User:Paine Ellsworth|Paine&nbsp;Ellsworth]]</font>&nbsp;(&nbsp;<font color="blue" face="Ariel">[[User talk:Paine Ellsworth|C<small>LIMAX</small>]]</font>&nbsp;)&nbsp; 15:25, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

270291 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-06 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.244280660E09 +++$+++ Its been long since [[Sagara Sanosuke]] became GA, but I finally edited the [[Myojin Yahiko]] article adding refs, exp lead, reception, creation, etc. I dont know if my grammar is better right now, but I made all the fixes you mentioned while fixing the Sanosuke article. Could you make a copy-edit to see if it can goes to GA. I was also thinking about getting the main series article, [[Rurouni Kenshin]], to GA, but that one is too long and the one from Yahiko is shorter. Tell me if you can and take your time. Regards. +++$+++ Its been long since [[Sagara Sanosuke]] became GA, but I finally edited the [[Myojin Yahiko]] article adding refs, exp lead, reception, creation, etc. I dont know if my grammar is better right now, but I made all the fixes you mentioned while fixing the Sanosuke article. Could you make a copy-edit to see if it can goes to GA. I was also thinking about getting the main series article, [[Rurouni Kenshin]], to GA, but that one is too long and the one from Yahiko is shorter. Tell me if you can and take your time. Regards.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 02:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
270292 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270291 +++$+++ 270291 +++$+++ 2009-06-06 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.244280840E09 +++$+++ OK, I will look at it. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, I will look at it. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
270293 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270291 +++$+++ 270292 +++$+++ 2009-06-06 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.244324160E09 +++$+++ Thanks. +++$+++ ::Thanks.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 14:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
270294 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270291 +++$+++ 270293 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.244444100E09 +++$+++ Hope what I did was helpful! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Hope what I did was helpful! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
270295 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270291 +++$+++ 270294 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.244444220E09 +++$+++ Thanks^_^. +++$+++ ::::Thanks^_^.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 23:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

576167 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-18 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.195386240E09 +++$+++ A request for arbitration involving you has been filed.  +++$+++ A request for arbitration involving you has been filed. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 03:44, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
576168 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576167 +++$+++ 576167 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.195394100E09 +++$+++ I see. Well...if the arbitration committee accepts it, then I'll have to participate. Otherwise, I see my efforts to continue to try and work out a reasonable solution on the NPA policy as well as efforts I commenced today to begin writing at least some short stubs on the glaciers in [[Glacier National Park (U.S.)]] will be sidetracked...that is truly unfortunate.-- +++$+++ :I see. Well...if the arbitration committee accepts it, then I'll have to participate. Otherwise, I see my efforts to continue to try and work out a reasonable solution on the NPA policy as well as efforts I commenced today to begin writing at least some short stubs on the glaciers in [[Glacier National Park (U.S.)]] will be sidetracked...that is truly unfortunate.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] ([[User talk:MONGO|talk]]) 05:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
576169 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576167 +++$+++ 576168 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.195397460E09 +++$+++ I reasonable solution at NPA would have occured a HELL of a lot sooner had you not attacked everyone you disagreed with. Now I have noticed your change in demeanour, and I hope this lasts, but as evinced by at least two arbcom cases you have been involved in, you have a problem with civility. This has been going for years, I do not see a resolution without arbcom intervention.  +++$+++ ::I reasonable solution at NPA would have occured a HELL of a lot sooner had you not attacked everyone you disagreed with. Now I have noticed your change in demeanour, and I hope this lasts, but as evinced by at least two arbcom cases you have been involved in, you have a problem with civility. This has been going for years, I do not see a resolution without arbcom intervention. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 06:51, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
576170 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576167 +++$+++ 576169 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.195401660E09 +++$+++ Sorry you feel that way.-- +++$+++ :::Sorry you feel that way.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] ([[User talk:MONGO|talk]]) 08:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
576171 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576167 +++$+++ 576170 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.195401780E09 +++$+++ To be honest, so am I.  +++$+++ ::::To be honest, so am I. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 08:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
576172 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576167 +++$+++ 576171 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 08:13:00 +++$+++ 1.195402380E09 +++$+++ You can still withdraw the request. I haven't decided who else to add yet, but I believe in full transparency as much as possible, so any names I add will be done publically and I'll notify them. I won't post anything unless arbcom accepts the case....I really do have other things I want to be doing.-- +++$+++ :::::You can still withdraw the request. I haven't decided who else to add yet, but I believe in full transparency as much as possible, so any names I add will be done publically and I'll notify them. I won't post anything unless arbcom accepts the case....I really do have other things I want to be doing.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] ([[User talk:MONGO|talk]]) 08:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
576173 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576167 +++$+++ 576172 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 08:48:00 +++$+++ 1.195404480E09 +++$+++ I would withdraw the request straight away, if i had felt this new calmer MONGO was goi ng to be a permanent change. But this has happened so many times, I cannot have confidence that that will be the case.  +++$+++ ::::::I would withdraw the request straight away, if i had felt this new calmer MONGO was goi ng to be a permanent change. But this has happened so many times, I cannot have confidence that that will be the case. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 08:48, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

174852 +++$+++ Magog the Ogre +++$+++ Jim.henderson +++$+++ 174852 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.311302400E09 +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Worldwide-plaza-fount-medium.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:Worldwide-plaza-fount-medium.JPG|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files\/2011 July 21#File:Worldwide-plaza-fount-medium.JPG|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf -->  +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Worldwide-plaza-fount-medium.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:Worldwide-plaza-fount-medium.JPG|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 July 21#File:Worldwide-plaza-fount-medium.JPG|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 19:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
174853 +++$+++ Jim.henderson +++$+++ Jim.henderson +++$+++ 174852 +++$+++ 174852 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311549180E09 +++$+++ Alas, in those days I didn't understand the possibility that a photo could violate the copyright of a statue, so I uploaded without knowing the copyright status.  Still don't know.   +++$+++ :Alas, in those days I didn't understand the possibility that a photo could violate the copyright of a statue, so I uploaded without knowing the copyright status.  Still don't know.  [[User:Jim.henderson|Jim.henderson]] ([[User talk:Jim.henderson#top|talk]]) 16:13, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
174854 +++$+++ Beyond My Ken +++$+++ Jim.henderson +++$+++ 174852 +++$+++ 174853 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.311582780E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, \"Freedom of Panorama\" in the U.S. covers only buildings, not statues and sculptures -- unlike most of the rest of the world where it covers everything.  It's patently ridiculous that it doesn't, but it would take a change in the law to make it right, and I don't exactly know who could help bring pressure in the right place to facilitate it.  The idea that a scultpure, for instance, which is displayed in a public place cannot be photographed is ludicrous, and cannot (obviously) be enforced in the real world, except in those cases where it is used for commercial purposes. The whole idea is even more bizarre when it involves art purchased with public money, displayed on public land, for the benefit of the public, if the artist has retained the copyright. Just crazy.<p>In the meantime, visual works made before 1923 are in the public domain, works from 1923 to 1978 must have a copyright notice (a simple c-in-a-circle with the date was sufficient for visual works) and are copyrighted for 95 years from the \"publication\" date, and works \"published\" after 1978 are covered for the life of the artist plus 70 years or 95 years if made for hire or anonymous.  +++$+++ ::Unfortunately, "Freedom of Panorama" in the U.S. covers only buildings, not statues and sculptures -- unlike most of the rest of the world where it covers everything.  It's patently ridiculous that it doesn't, but it would take a change in the law to make it right, and I don't exactly know who could help bring pressure in the right place to facilitate it.  The idea that a scultpure, for instance, which is displayed in a public place cannot be photographed is ludicrous, and cannot (obviously) be enforced in the real world, except in those cases where it is used for commercial purposes. The whole idea is even more bizarre when it involves art purchased with public money, displayed on public land, for the benefit of the public, if the artist has retained the copyright. Just crazy.<p>In the meantime, visual works made before 1923 are in the public domain, works from 1923 to 1978 must have a copyright notice (a simple c-in-a-circle with the date was sufficient for visual works) and are copyrighted for 95 years from the "publication" date, and works "published" after 1978 are covered for the life of the artist plus 70 years or 95 years if made for hire or anonymous. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 01:33, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
174855 +++$+++ Beyond My Ken +++$+++ Jim.henderson +++$+++ 174852 +++$+++ 174854 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311584640E09 +++$+++ According to [http:\/\/www.sidneysimon.com\/time_line.htm his website], the artist, Sidney Simon, died in 1997, so by our current law, the fountain (if the copyright was retained by him) will not be out of copyright until the end of 2067.  If the complex owns the copyright, it will be public domain in 2084.  That this is the case is preposterous.  We really need to get full Freedom of Panorama in the U.S.  +++$+++ :::According to [http://www.sidneysimon.com/time_line.htm his website], the artist, Sidney Simon, died in 1997, so by our current law, the fountain (if the copyright was retained by him) will not be out of copyright until the end of 2067.  If the complex owns the copyright, it will be public domain in 2084.  That this is the case is preposterous.  We really need to get full Freedom of Panorama in the U.S. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 02:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
174856 +++$+++ Jim.henderson +++$+++ Jim.henderson +++$+++ 174852 +++$+++ 174853 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311821460E09 +++$+++ As Mr Bumble exclaimed, upon hearing of a consequence of the law of [[coverture]], if that's how the law sees it \"then the law's a ass\".  However, if that's how the law sees it then it's still the law.  As with other concepts such as [[Orphan works in the United States]] and [[Freedom of panorama]] there are pressure groups for looser protection from photography and other potential violations, but the groups for tightness have been winning.  Without a central legal enactment, local authorities could specify that a public sculpture paid by public funds would have to be free from copyright (or, free at least as regards photography) but most new statuary in New York nowadays is by private funds, and anyway politicians see no reason for such an abstruse enactment.  Drat.   +++$+++ ::As Mr Bumble exclaimed, upon hearing of a consequence of the law of [[coverture]], if that's how the law sees it "then the law's a ass".  However, if that's how the law sees it then it's still the law.  As with other concepts such as [[Orphan works in the United States]] and [[Freedom of panorama]] there are pressure groups for looser protection from photography and other potential violations, but the groups for tightness have been winning.  Without a central legal enactment, local authorities could specify that a public sculpture paid by public funds would have to be free from copyright (or, free at least as regards photography) but most new statuary in New York nowadays is by private funds, and anyway politicians see no reason for such an abstruse enactment.  Drat.  [[User:Jim.henderson|Jim.henderson]] ([[User talk:Jim.henderson#top|talk]]) 19:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

176121 +++$+++ Heironymous Rowe +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ 176121 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-18 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.287449760E09 +++$+++ Cool, right on. I do alot of stuff on Pre Columbian Native American articles, glad you like them. Do you do murals too?  +++$+++ Cool, right on. I do alot of stuff on Pre Columbian Native American articles, glad you like them. Do you do murals too? [[User:Heironymous Rowe|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkBlue">He</span>''']][[User talk:Heironymous Rowe|'''<span style="color:darkBlue">iro'''</span>]] 17:56, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
176122 +++$+++ Heironymous Rowe +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ 176121 +++$+++ 176121 +++$+++ 2010-10-19 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.287540360E09 +++$+++ I dont really edit much about murals here, since it is what I do for a living, lol. Most of what I know about them is from the 300 or so I've worked on across the country. And writing about those would probably involve some COI issues here. I edit mostly Native American history, mostly [[Mississippian culture]] related stuff, but also alot of the other Mound Building cultures. With my job, I've gotten to travel quit a bit thru the Ohio and Mississippi river valleys, so I make side trips and pitstops to photograph them, consequently quit a few are illustrated with my photos. I grew up not too far from Serpent Mound in southern Ohio. I used to have an apartment in Portsmouth, Ohio about 2 houses over from the last remnants of the [[Portsmouth Earthworks]].  +++$+++ :I dont really edit much about murals here, since it is what I do for a living, lol. Most of what I know about them is from the 300 or so I've worked on across the country. And writing about those would probably involve some COI issues here. I edit mostly Native American history, mostly [[Mississippian culture]] related stuff, but also alot of the other Mound Building cultures. With my job, I've gotten to travel quit a bit thru the Ohio and Mississippi river valleys, so I make side trips and pitstops to photograph them, consequently quit a few are illustrated with my photos. I grew up not too far from Serpent Mound in southern Ohio. I used to have an apartment in Portsmouth, Ohio about 2 houses over from the last remnants of the [[Portsmouth Earthworks]]. [[User:Heironymous Rowe|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkBlue">He</span>''']][[User talk:Heironymous Rowe|'''<span style="color:darkBlue">iro'''</span>]] 19:06, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

270296 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270296 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-19 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.245450720E09 +++$+++ It became GA. Thanks for the copy-edit. +++$+++ It became GA. Thanks for the copy-edit.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 15:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
270297 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270296 +++$+++ 270296 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.245451020E09 +++$+++ I'm very happy to hear that. Congratulations! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I'm very happy to hear that. Congratulations! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:37, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

613028 +++$+++ Pencefn +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613028 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.202934780E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Fila943&oldid=191105599 This edit (latest outburst)] shows that any attempt at coaching is not getting anywhere. You may recall in the past you [[User_talk:Fila3466757#Behaviour|warned this user]] about his behaviour. Where do we go now? -- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fila943&oldid=191105599 This edit (latest outburst)] shows that any attempt at coaching is not getting anywhere. You may recall in the past you [[User_talk:Fila3466757#Behaviour|warned this user]] about his behaviour. Where do we go now? --[[User:Pencefn|Stewart]]<small><font color="maroon"><sup> '''[[User talk:Pencefn#top|(talk)]]'''</sup></font></small> 12:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
613029 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613028 +++$+++ 613028 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.202944020E09 +++$+++ Pretty clear it's the same, we have a breathing space as Fila943 was blocked by Alexf42 for 48 hours from 14:14 today. If you could put a brief report up at [[WP:SSP]] then I'll review it and extend the block. That ok? ..  +++$+++ :Pretty clear it's the same, we have a breathing space as Fila943 was blocked by Alexf42 for 48 hours from 14:14 today. If you could put a brief report up at [[WP:SSP]] then I'll review it and extend the block. That ok? .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
613030 +++$+++ Pencefn +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613028 +++$+++ 613029 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.202953320E09 +++$+++ Others have submitted [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Fila943]] and an indefinite block has been applied. -- +++$+++ ::Others have submitted [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fila943]] and an indefinite block has been applied. --[[User:Pencefn|Stewart]]<small><font color="maroon"><sup> '''[[User talk:Pencefn#top|(talk)]]'''</sup></font></small> 17:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
613031 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613028 +++$+++ 613030 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.202956200E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that's better. ...  +++$+++ :::Thanks, that's better. ... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

270298 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270298 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-17 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.245305940E09 +++$+++ Just a quick note; if you feel at any point that you'd prefer to back away from the [[Arthur Eve]] GA review then I'd be quite happy to take it over from you, or perhaps one of your advisors? In any event don't let it stress you. :-) -- +++$+++ Just a quick note; if you feel at any point that you'd prefer to back away from the [[Arthur Eve]] GA review then I'd be quite happy to take it over from you, or perhaps one of your advisors? In any event don't let it stress you. :-) --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
270299 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270298 +++$+++ 270298 +++$+++ 2009-06-17 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.245306720E09 +++$+++ Actually, I would like that.  I want to see a good way of handling these situations and you could model that for me. I do feel unsure about how to proceed.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Actually, I would like that.  I want to see a good way of handling these situations and you could model that for me. I do feel unsure about how to proceed.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
270300 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270298 +++$+++ 270299 +++$+++ 2009-06-17 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.245307680E09 +++$+++ If you want me take over the review then just post a note saying so on the review page and I'll take it from there. I'm certain that you'd do the same for me if the situation was reversed. -- +++$+++ ::If you want me take over the review then just post a note saying so on the review page and I'll take it from there. I'm certain that you'd do the same for me if the situation was reversed. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

270301 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-19 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.245475380E09 +++$+++ I'm getting about ready to close this review now Mattisse; just a couple of issues outstanding. Perhaps you'd like to take a look through my summary of what I think remains to be done, and if you think there's anything else maybe add it? Naturally I'll take any and all flak, but your opinion on the article now, either here or in the article's review page would be appreciated, at least by me. -- +++$+++ I'm getting about ready to close this review now Mattisse; just a couple of issues outstanding. Perhaps you'd like to take a look through my summary of what I think remains to be done, and if you think there's anything else maybe add it? Naturally I'll take any and all flak, but your opinion on the article now, either here or in the article's review page would be appreciated, at least by me. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 22:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
270302 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270301 +++$+++ 270301 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.245477720E09 +++$+++ It is certainly much improved and I agree with your judgment. (It still seems strange that his birth place is unknown.) Thank you so much for taking this review over! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :It is certainly much improved and I agree with your judgment. (It still seems strange that his birth place is unknown.) Thank you so much for taking this review over! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
270303 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270301 +++$+++ 270302 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.245478560E09 +++$+++ That does seem strange, I agree, but public figures are often less than open about certain aspects of their private lives. I've got no doubt that Eve's place of birth coukd be established pretty easily, but unless we can provide a citation to a reliable source which has taken the trouble to do the investigation then it's just OR, not allowed by the rules of engagement here on wikipedia, as you know. And as this article is a BLP we need to be doubly careful. Anyway, thanks for taking another look through it; if you'd still had major reservations I would have failed the article. -- +++$+++ ::That does seem strange, I agree, but public figures are often less than open about certain aspects of their private lives. I've got no doubt that Eve's place of birth coukd be established pretty easily, but unless we can provide a citation to a reliable source which has taken the trouble to do the investigation then it's just OR, not allowed by the rules of engagement here on wikipedia, as you know. And as this article is a BLP we need to be doubly careful. Anyway, thanks for taking another look through it; if you'd still had major reservations I would have failed the article. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
270304 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270301 +++$+++ 270303 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.245479460E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I appreciate the very thorough job you did! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Thank you. I appreciate the very thorough job you did! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

8160 +++$+++ Secretlondon +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8160 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-12 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.189580820E09 +++$+++ Your name isn't part of an [[IP address]].  +++$+++ Your name isn't part of an [[IP address]]. [[User:Secretlondon|Secretlondon]] 00:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
8161 +++$+++ Secretlondon +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8160 +++$+++ 8160 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.189856040E09 +++$+++ I've removed you, but you could have removed yourself.  +++$+++ :I've removed you, but you could have removed yourself. [[User:Secretlondon|Secretlondon]] 04:34, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

270306 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270306 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-21 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.245649800E09 +++$+++ FYI, I decided not to list this article as a GA. -- +++$+++ FYI, I decided not to list this article as a GA. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 22:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
270307 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270306 +++$+++ 270306 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.245659100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know the outcome. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know the outcome. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

8164 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.189717740E09 +++$+++ I have added Internal Links to this article.   +++$+++ I have added Internal Links to this article.  [[User:Kathleen.wright5|Kathleen.wright5]] 14:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
8165 +++$+++ SteveCrook +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8164 +++$+++ 8164 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.189718760E09 +++$+++ You can over-do the links. A lot of the links you made don't link to anything. Do you plan to write articles for them all, or do you think anyone else will. Some of them, like the link to [[Walker]] have nothing to do with Private Walker --  +++$+++ : You can over-do the links. A lot of the links you made don't link to anything. Do you plan to write articles for them all, or do you think anyone else will. Some of them, like the link to [[Walker]] have nothing to do with Private Walker -- [[User:SteveCrook|SteveCrook]] 14:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
8166 +++$+++ Zir +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8164 +++$+++ 8165 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.189809900E09 +++$+++ And I agree entirely with --[[User:R'n'B|Russ]] and -- [[User:SteveCrook|SteveCrook]] as I've just spent half an hour removing or redirecting your wikilinks in just one [[Dad's Army#Origins|section]] of this article which went to disambiguation pages or the wrong place! Curb your enthusiasm please and TRY wikilinks once you have created them to see where they lead.....  +++$+++ ::And I agree entirely with --[[User:R'n'B|Russ]] and -- [[User:SteveCrook|SteveCrook]] as I've just spent half an hour removing or redirecting your wikilinks in just one [[Dad's Army#Origins|section]] of this article which went to disambiguation pages or the wrong place! Curb your enthusiasm please and TRY wikilinks once you have created them to see where they lead..... [[User:Zir|Zir]] 15:45, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

270309 +++$+++ Literaturegeek  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270309 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-18 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.245389940E09 +++$+++ Some quick background, issues with references and most other issues have been resolved, copy editing has been done by several editors but reviewers keep finding several problems with the article and no matter how hard I or others try there is always \"something\" which remains to be done, so really think we need a skilled copyeditor to give the final nudge to FA status. :)-- +++$+++ Some quick background, issues with references and most other issues have been resolved, copy editing has been done by several editors but reviewers keep finding several problems with the article and no matter how hard I or others try there is always "something" which remains to be done, so really think we need a skilled copyeditor to give the final nudge to FA status. :)--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 22:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
270310 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270309 +++$+++ 270309 +++$+++ 2009-06-18 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.245390780E09 +++$+++ I can go through it strictly as a copy editor, not addressing content or referencing. Can't guarantee success though.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I can go through it strictly as a copy editor, not addressing content or referencing. Can't guarantee success though.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

532454 +++$+++ AjaxSmack +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-27 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.141036500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:AjaxSmack|AjaxSmack]] 02:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
532455 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532454 +++$+++ 532454 +++$+++ 2006-02-27 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.141081140E09 +++$+++ Acknowledged. Regards, -- +++$+++ : Acknowledged. Regards, --[[User:Tone|Tone]] 14:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

8167 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-15 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.189878900E09 +++$+++ I have removed most of the Internal Links at \"[[Lost in Space]]\".   +++$+++ I have removed most of the Internal Links at "[[Lost in Space]]".  [[User:Kathleen.wright5|Kathleen.wright5]] 10:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
8168 +++$+++ Zir +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8167 +++$+++ 8167 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.189883580E09 +++$+++ Best of luck & tread carefully as some people can be very proprietorial about articles.....  +++$+++ :Best of luck & tread carefully as some people can be very proprietorial about articles..... [[User:Zir|Zir]] 12:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

270313 +++$+++ Literaturegeek  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270313 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-19 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.245458520E09 +++$+++ Thanks. :) Impressive so far Mattisse. :) It is amazing how much redundancy and needed copyediting is easily missed. One comment, you put a comma before the word \"and\". Is that American thing? I was always taught not to do that when in school in UK, just curious.-- +++$+++ Thanks. :) Impressive so far Mattisse. :) It is amazing how much redundancy and needed copyediting is easily missed. One comment, you put a comma before the word "and". Is that American thing? I was always taught not to do that when in school in UK, just curious.--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 17:42, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
270314 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270313 +++$+++ 270313 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.245458940E09 +++$+++ I usually don't put a comma before the last \"and\". There was one sentence where I added it in that situation because the context seemed possibly a little confusing, but its a judgement call so remove it if you think it is unneeded. It's an interesting article, a thorough explanation of the drug. I enjoyed reading it!  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I usually don't put a comma before the last "and". There was one sentence where I added it in that situation because the context seemed possibly a little confusing, but its a judgement call so remove it if you think it is unneeded. It's an interesting article, a thorough explanation of the drug. I enjoyed reading it!  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

8170 +++$+++ Truthanado +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-22 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.190452080E09 +++$+++ Would you please explain what you are doing to the [[State leaders by year]] article. Assuming that you are making [[good faith]] edits, important [[wikilink]]s to articles for each individual year individual are being incorrectly removed. This article is actually an index to all of the detailed articles, arranged by year. If you need help with this, please let me know by responding here. This talk page is on my watchlist so I will see when you make a response. Thanks.  +++$+++ Would you please explain what you are doing to the [[State leaders by year]] article. Assuming that you are making [[good faith]] edits, important [[wikilink]]s to articles for each individual year individual are being incorrectly removed. This article is actually an index to all of the detailed articles, arranged by year. If you need help with this, please let me know by responding here. This talk page is on my watchlist so I will see when you make a response. Thanks. [[User:Truthanado|Truthanado]] 02:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
8171 +++$+++ Truthanado +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8170 +++$+++ 8170 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.190452800E09 +++$+++ I see you are trying to remove red links. Although it is normally a good idea to do that, in this article, the red links are okay. Eventually, someone will create articles for the red-link years. Apologizing for the time you have spent on this, I suggest you revert the article to the version before you started your edits today. If you need help doing that, let me know.  +++$+++ :I see you are trying to remove red links. Although it is normally a good idea to do that, in this article, the red links are okay. Eventually, someone will create articles for the red-link years. Apologizing for the time you have spent on this, I suggest you revert the article to the version before you started your edits today. If you need help doing that, let me know. [[User:Truthanado|Truthanado]] 02:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
8172 +++$+++ Truthanado +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8170 +++$+++ 8171 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.190453220E09 +++$+++ Please stop trying to remove the red links in this article. All of the effort you are spending will probably be reverted. In this article, it is OKAY to have red links because there will eventually be articles written to correctly [[wikilink]] to.  +++$+++ ::Please stop trying to remove the red links in this article. All of the effort you are spending will probably be reverted. In this article, it is OKAY to have red links because there will eventually be articles written to correctly [[wikilink]] to. [[User:Truthanado|Truthanado]] 02:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
8173 +++$+++ Truthanado +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8170 +++$+++ 8172 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.190453580E09 +++$+++ Let me help with the revert you've started. You don't need to undo each one individually. I'll do it for you and then explain, okay?  +++$+++ :::Let me help with the revert you've started. You don't need to undo each one individually. I'll do it for you and then explain, okay? [[User:Truthanado|Truthanado]] 02:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
8174 +++$+++ Truthanado +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8170 +++$+++ 8173 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.190454120E09 +++$+++ When that version of the article opens, click ''edit this page'', enter the reason for the revert in the ''Edit summary'' and click ''Save page''. Presto. Article is reverted. ''Undo'' works best for reverting just 1 edit. BTW, I notice from your user page that you are in Australia. A nice country, I've been there a few times on business, Brisbane and Perth. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::::When that version of the article opens, click ''edit this page'', enter the reason for the revert in the ''Edit summary'' and click ''Save page''. Presto. Article is reverted. ''Undo'' works best for reverting just 1 edit. BTW, I notice from your user page that you are in Australia. A nice country, I've been there a few times on business, Brisbane and Perth. Cheers. [[User:Truthanado|Truthanado]] 02:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
8175 +++$+++ Truthanado +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8170 +++$+++ 8174 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.190454660E09 +++$+++ Could you tell me where I can find the \"REDLINKS to be removed department\"? I don't think this article should be included. I suspect it may have been included by a BOT who just blindly looks for red links.  +++$+++ :::::Could you tell me where I can find the "REDLINKS to be removed department"? I don't think this article should be included. I suspect it may have been included by a BOT who just blindly looks for red links. [[User:Truthanado|Truthanado]] 02:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
8176 +++$+++ Truthanado +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8170 +++$+++ 8175 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.190455560E09 +++$+++ The Wikipedia community appreciates your work to reduce the number of red links in articles. Unfortunately, this article is one that doesn't need to be fixed. There are many others ... happy hunting.  +++$+++ ::::::The Wikipedia community appreciates your work to reduce the number of red links in articles. Unfortunately, this article is one that doesn't need to be fixed. There are many others ... happy hunting. [[User:Truthanado|Truthanado]] 03:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
8177 +++$+++ -The Doctor- +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8170 +++$+++ 8170 +++$+++ 2007-09-24 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.190618340E09 +++$+++ Hmm, Well I'll try my best, I'm not farmiliar with that though but I wouldn't mind doing a bit of research. If it does get deleted though I'll save a copy of it as a sub off my userpage. I'll add a link here under this when I finally add it and please feel free to add to it. <b>An [[Apple]] a day keeps  +++$+++ :Hmm, Well I'll try my best, I'm not farmiliar with that though but I wouldn't mind doing a bit of research. If it does get deleted though I'll save a copy of it as a sub off my userpage. I'll add a link here under this when I finally add it and please feel free to add to it. <b>An [[Apple]] a day keeps [[User:-The Doctor-|<font color="Green">-The Doctor-</font>]] Away.. </b><i>[[Special:Random|Or does it!]]</i> <sup>[[User_talk:-The Doctor-|(talk)]][[Special:contributions/-The Doctor-|(contribs)]]</sup> 00:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

270316 +++$+++ Priyanath +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270316 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-18 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.245392160E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, thank you for your guidance and understanding with the [[Ramprasad Sen]] article, and for helping make Wikipedia a positive experience! Regards,  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, thank you for your guidance and understanding with the [[Ramprasad Sen]] article, and for helping make Wikipedia a positive experience! Regards, [[User:Priyanath|Priyanath]]&nbsp;<i><sup>[[User talk:Priyanath|talk]]</sup></i> 23:16, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
270317 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270316 +++$+++ 270316 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.245398880E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome, as I believe your article deserves recognition. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :You are very welcome, as I believe your article deserves recognition. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

270318 +++$+++ Nvineeth +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-19 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.245419880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the GAR, I feel that the article has improved since & I learnt quite a few things from the GAR. Thank you. -- +++$+++ Thanks for the GAR, I feel that the article has improved since & I learnt quite a few things from the GAR. Thank you. --[[User:Nvineeth|Nvineeth]] ([[User talk:Nvineeth|talk]]) 06:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
270319 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270318 +++$+++ 270318 +++$+++ 2009-06-21 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.245635160E09 +++$+++ Also, thanks very much for all the polishing of ''[[On the Origin of Species]]'' to successfully bring it through FAC. Much appreciated,  +++$+++ :Also, thanks very much for all the polishing of ''[[On the Origin of Species]]'' to successfully bring it through FAC. Much appreciated, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
270320 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270318 +++$+++ 270319 +++$+++ 2009-06-21 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.245636060E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. It was a pleasure! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::You are very welcome. It was a pleasure! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

45053 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ 45053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-07 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.307480340E09 +++$+++ Hmmm & regards   +++$+++ Hmmm & regards  [[User:Charles01|Charles01]] ([[User talk:Charles01#top|talk]]) 13:59, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
45054 +++$+++ Cimmerian praetor +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ 45053 +++$+++ 45053 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.307482620E09 +++$+++ If it helps, here comes the [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=D3mllMoNJ0IC&dq=Franzens%20universit%C3%A4t%20olm%C3%BCtz&hl=de&pg=RA1-PA297#v=onepage&q=Franzens%20universit%C3%A4t%20olm%C3%BCtz&f=false context]. +++$+++ :If it helps, here comes the [http://books.google.com/books?id=D3mllMoNJ0IC&dq=Franzens%20universit%C3%A4t%20olm%C3%BCtz&hl=de&pg=RA1-PA297#v=onepage&q=Franzens%20universit%C3%A4t%20olm%C3%BCtz&f=false context].[[User:Cimmerian praetor|Cimmerian praetor]] ([[User talk:Cimmerian praetor|talk]]) 14:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
45055 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ 45053 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.307494740E09 +++$+++ Either way, it lacks the simple elegance (I suspect) of the German original text.   When discussing Bavaria, there is no real Anglophone equivalent of Weiss-blau.   Unless your English speaking interlocutor is familiar with Bavaria you have to explain Weiss-blau and by the time you've done that, you wonder if it was worth it.   I wonder if we have the same issue with Schwarz-gelb here.   Perhaps, since it is a short text, one could quote BOTH the German language original AND in (italics) a translation in the info box.   I'm not sure about this.   Just thinking on paper.   Regards  +++$+++ :::Either way, it lacks the simple elegance (I suspect) of the German original text.   When discussing Bavaria, there is no real Anglophone equivalent of Weiss-blau.   Unless your English speaking interlocutor is familiar with Bavaria you have to explain Weiss-blau and by the time you've done that, you wonder if it was worth it.   I wonder if we have the same issue with Schwarz-gelb here.   Perhaps, since it is a short text, one could quote BOTH the German language original AND in (italics) a translation in the info box.   I'm not sure about this.   Just thinking on paper.   Regards [[User:Charles01|Charles01]] ([[User talk:Charles01#top|talk]]) 17:59, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

270321 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-21 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.245631080E09 +++$+++ I have been working on this list for the past several months, and, if available, wanted to know if you would give me some feedback?  I am thinking about nominating it for FA status in the next couple months, and would appreciate your input.  Regardless, thank you for your work on wikipedia! --- +++$+++ I have been working on this list for the past several months, and, if available, wanted to know if you would give me some feedback?  I am thinking about nominating it for FA status in the next couple months, and would appreciate your input.  Regardless, thank you for your work on wikipedia! ---[[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 17:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
270322 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270321 +++$+++ 270321 +++$+++ 2009-06-21 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.245633180E09 +++$+++ I'm not a good person to ask, since I am not that familiar with skin conditions and I also don't know  much about lists. I have never even copy edited a list.  I notice that the article has an \"A\" rating. Good luck!  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I'm not a good person to ask, since I am not that familiar with skin conditions and I also don't know  much about lists. I have never even copy edited a list.  I notice that the article has an "A" rating. Good luck!  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:13, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

8180 +++$+++ Graeme Bartlett +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-02 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.191391380E09 +++$+++ I notice that you are adding categories  to radio stations.  This is unnecessary as the articles are already in narrower categories.  You may find that other editors may remove this category later, I won't bother myself!  +++$+++ I notice that you are adding categories  to radio stations.  This is unnecessary as the articles are already in narrower categories.  You may find that other editors may remove this category later, I won't bother myself! [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] 23:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
8181 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8180 +++$+++ 8180 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.191446880E09 +++$+++ And some might get concerned that there are more templates than info in some stubs! - cheers  +++$+++ :And some might get concerned that there are more templates than info in some stubs! - cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 14:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
8182 +++$+++ Muzzamo +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8180 +++$+++ 8181 +++$+++ 2007-10-07 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.191826020E09 +++$+++ Agreed..  +++$+++ :: Agreed.. [[User:Muzzamo|Muzzamo]] 23:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

270326 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-22 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.245694020E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Thanks for all [[Tiktaalik|the fish]], [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]], and for doing so much to improve ''[[On the Origin of Species]]''. . .  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for all [[Tiktaalik|the fish]], [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]], and for doing so much to improve ''[[On the Origin of Species]]''. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 11:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
270327 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270326 +++$+++ 270326 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.245723960E09 +++$+++ Thanks! A pleasure for me.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks! A pleasure for me.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:26, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

532471 +++$+++ J S Lundeen +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-11 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.142141460E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know that you incorrectly sorted [[Principle of minimum energy]] into the classical mechanics stub.  This principle is wide reaching, as the article shows, and belongs in the general physics stub.-- +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know that you incorrectly sorted [[Principle of minimum energy]] into the classical mechanics stub.  This principle is wide reaching, as the article shows, and belongs in the general physics stub.--[[User:J S Lundeen|J S Lundeen]] 21:31, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
532472 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532471 +++$+++ 532471 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.142195400E09 +++$+++ I agree, this sort was not perfect. Sometiems it's hard to tell where to put something since the fields are close to each other. Notify me if you find another mistakes. Thanks. --[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : I agree, this sort was not perfect. Sometiems it's hard to tell where to put something since the fields are close to each other. Notify me if you find another mistakes. Thanks. --[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]] 12:30, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

270328 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-22 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.245693900E09 +++$+++ Do you think you can hold your nose and do some copyediting on [[United States Senate election in California, 1950]]?-- +++$+++ Do you think you can hold your nose and do some copyediting on [[United States Senate election in California, 1950]]?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 11:05, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
270329 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270328 +++$+++ 270328 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.245737940E09 +++$+++ I tried. But I ran into \"party officials\" in the lead, and could not go any further!  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I tried. But I ran into "party officials" in the lead, and could not go any further!  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
270330 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270328 +++$+++ 270329 +++$+++ 2009-06-23 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.245801480E09 +++$+++ Oh.  Sorry.  How about [[Matthew Boulton]], then?-- +++$+++ ::Oh.  Sorry.  How about [[Matthew Boulton]], then?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 16:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
270331 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270328 +++$+++ 270330 +++$+++ 2009-06-24 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.245871860E09 +++$+++ Boulton is now at FAC, possibly a bit early but I think I can clean up the sawdust and mess faster than they can find it.-- +++$+++ :::Boulton is now at FAC, possibly a bit early but I think I can clean up the sawdust and mess faster than they can find it.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 12:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

612829 +++$+++ Daisey cutter +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612829 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-17 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.187348700E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:66.47.51.78&oldid=101199517], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3A66.47.51.78&diff=148817816&oldid=101199517] which will make a whole lot of sense once you trace the IP to the NSCE.  See also [[Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest\/Noticeboard#Project_Steve]], as well as edits to the [[Eugenie Scott]] article.   +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:66.47.51.78&oldid=101199517], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A66.47.51.78&diff=148817816&oldid=101199517] which will make a whole lot of sense once you trace the IP to the NSCE.  See also [[Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Project_Steve]], as well as edits to the [[Eugenie Scott]] article.  [[User:Daisey cutter|Daisey cutter]] 04:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
612830 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612829 +++$+++ 612829 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.187370120E09 +++$+++ Ta. ...  +++$+++ :Ta. ... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 10:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

8187 +++$+++ Muzzamo +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8187 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-07 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.191826440E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Muzzamo|Muzzamo]] 23:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
8188 +++$+++ Muzzamo +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8187 +++$+++ 8187 +++$+++ 2007-10-17 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.192629360E09 +++$+++ Kathleen, I noticed that you have done this again in the article [[Cruise_1323]]. Could you please take more care?  +++$+++ : Kathleen, I noticed that you have done this again in the article [[Cruise_1323]]. Could you please take more care? [[User:Muzzamo|Muzzamo]] 06:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

270333 +++$+++ Nvvchar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-19 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.245423900E09 +++$+++ Since you gave me a tutorial about 18 months back on how to sign, I have made progress in posting articles on Wikipedia. My earliest one was on [[Kadamba tree]] which you had started long back. After that you have reviewed a number of my articles on DYK talkpage. I have now prepared an expanded version of the stub article [[Chitradurga Fort]] in my sand box page [[User:Nvvchar\/sandbox]], which you had started quite some time back. I have now expanded it by more than five times. I thought it proper to request you nominate this article (if you find it in order) on DYK with a suitable Hook. I will transfer it to the main article after hearing from you. Thank you.-- +++$+++ Since you gave me a tutorial about 18 months back on how to sign, I have made progress in posting articles on Wikipedia. My earliest one was on [[Kadamba tree]] which you had started long back. After that you have reviewed a number of my articles on DYK talkpage. I have now prepared an expanded version of the stub article [[Chitradurga Fort]] in my sand box page [[User:Nvvchar/sandbox]], which you had started quite some time back. I have now expanded it by more than five times. I thought it proper to request you nominate this article (if you find it in order) on DYK with a suitable Hook. I will transfer it to the main article after hearing from you. Thank you.--[[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]) 08:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
270334 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270333 +++$+++ 270333 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.245449040E09 +++$+++ I am unsure how to move the article out of your user space to replace the old article with the same title. If you just pasted it over, you would lose all of your edit history for the article. Have you thought of a way to do that? I would be happy to co-nominate it and give it a hook. &mdash; +++$+++ :I am unsure how to move the article out of your user space to replace the old article with the same title. If you just pasted it over, you would lose all of your edit history for the article. Have you thought of a way to do that? I would be happy to co-nominate it and give it a hook. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
270335 +++$+++ Nvvchar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270333 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-20 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.245489300E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I have pasted the enlarged article on the existing stub page of the [[Chitradurga Fort]], as a start stage article. It does not disturb the History, since, in the Sandbox, only my name appears. You may kindly co-nominate with a hook and also an image of the fort.-- +++$+++ ::* Thanks. I have pasted the enlarged article on the existing stub page of the [[Chitradurga Fort]], as a start stage article. It does not disturb the History, since, in the Sandbox, only my name appears. You may kindly co-nominate with a hook and also an image of the fort.--[[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]) 02:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
270336 +++$+++ Nvvchar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270333 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-26 09:07:00 +++$+++ 1.246032420E09 +++$+++ The DYK has been cleared but I don't understand the remark which says \"You seemed to have placed a reference within the body of the article, was this the intent?\". Shall I say yes or would you like to reply? I have also read your observations on my User page. Thanks. Since I have seen most of my country as part of my service life, I suppose I can contribute articles on a number of subjects. Are there any stub articles on India which you want me to expand for our joint nomination?Thanks and Regards-- +++$+++ ::: The DYK has been cleared but I don't understand the remark which says "You seemed to have placed a reference within the body of the article, was this the intent?". Shall I say yes or would you like to reply? I have also read your observations on my User page. Thanks. Since I have seen most of my country as part of my service life, I suppose I can contribute articles on a number of subjects. Are there any stub articles on India which you want me to expand for our joint nomination?Thanks and Regards--[[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]) 09:07, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
270337 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270333 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-26 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.246042920E09 +++$+++ I don't understand the remark at DYK either. Maybe you should ask what is meant? I haven't worked on articles for India for a long time. The water and energy issues are particularly interesting. I tried to do some articles on the river systems and found it is quite complex. That is something we could think about. I was impressed at how creative and proactive India is in dealing with energy problems. (I change the [[Chitradurga Fort]] article to the way I had it before, but feel free to modify it to your preference!)  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I don't understand the remark at DYK either. Maybe you should ask what is meant? I haven't worked on articles for India for a long time. The water and energy issues are particularly interesting. I tried to do some articles on the river systems and found it is quite complex. That is something we could think about. I was impressed at how creative and proactive India is in dealing with energy problems. (I change the [[Chitradurga Fort]] article to the way I had it before, but feel free to modify it to your preference!)  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
270338 +++$+++ Nvvchar +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270333 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-27 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.246090440E09 +++$+++ Thank you for making the revert. The DYK is through now. I will think about the issues you have mentioned to post artciles.-- +++$+++ ::::: Thank you for making the revert. The DYK is through now. I will think about the issues you have mentioned to post artciles.--[[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]) 01:14, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

8191 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8191 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-13 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.192310400E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Chrome_paint&diff=164043933&oldid=163901485 for teaching me a new stub type.] +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chrome_paint&diff=164043933&oldid=163901485 for teaching me a new stub type.][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|  '''Cheers,<font color="#009500"> :) Dloh</font><font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 14:20, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
8192 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8191 +++$+++ 8191 +++$+++ 2007-10-13 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.192310880E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADlohcierekim&diff=164283218&oldid=164254298 Me neither, but it's one more option.] +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADlohcierekim&diff=164283218&oldid=164254298 Me neither, but it's one more option.][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|  '''Cheers,<font color="#009500"> :) Dloh</font><font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 14:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

532480 +++$+++ Jfingers88 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532480 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-04 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.144141080E09 +++$+++ I saw you welcomed the user above, but your <nowiki>{{helpme}}<\/nowiki> turned into the full template, putting this user on the <nowiki>[[Category:Wikipedians looking for help]]<\/nowiki>. I changed your <nowiki><code> tag into a <nowiki> tag<\/nowiki>. Please check your welcome to see that it doesn't happen again. Thanks. [[User:Jfingers88|<font color=\"darkgreen\">Jfing<\/font>]] +++$+++ I saw you welcomed the user above, but your <nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki> turned into the full template, putting this user on the <nowiki>[[Category:Wikipedians looking for help]]</nowiki>. I changed your <nowiki><code> tag into a <nowiki> tag</nowiki>. Please check your welcome to see that it doesn't happen again. Thanks. [[User:Jfingers88|<font color="darkgreen">Jfing</font>]][[User:Jfingers88/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''e'''</font>]]<font color="blue">r</font><font color="black">s</font>[[User Talk:Jfingers88|<font color="blue">88</font>]] 01:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
532481 +++$+++ Jfingers88 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532480 +++$+++ 532480 +++$+++ 2006-04-04 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.144141920E09 +++$+++ It turns out it was [[User:ZsinjBot]]. Sorry. [[User:Jfingers88|<font color=\"darkgreen\">Jfing<\/font>]] +++$+++ :It turns out it was [[User:ZsinjBot]]. Sorry. [[User:Jfingers88|<font color="darkgreen">Jfing</font>]][[User:Jfingers88/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''e'''</font>]]<font color="blue">r</font><font color="black">s</font>[[User Talk:Jfingers88|<font color="blue">88</font>]] 02:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

569344 +++$+++ BradBeattie +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569344 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.165922400E09 +++$+++ Hey there Aeropagitica, a while back you provided some insightful comments on my RFA. If you have a moment, could you take a look at what I've been up to over the past while and provide any pointers where you see fit? Thanks. :) -- +++$+++ Hey there Aeropagitica, a while back you provided some insightful comments on my RFA. If you have a moment, could you take a look at what I've been up to over the past while and provide any pointers where you see fit? Thanks. :) --[[User:BradBeattie|Brad Beattie]] <small>[[User talk:BradBeattie|(talk)]]</small> 03:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
569345 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569344 +++$+++ 569344 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.166060820E09 +++$+++ Good afternoon Brad, or should I say ''konishiwa'' as you appear to be in Tokyo as I type this?  I have reviewed your last five hundred edits in the user Talk and Wikipedia spaces, as they are the areas that I made a particular point of noting at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FBradBeattie&diff=82289846&oldid=82287580 your RfA]. My particular concerns were to do with warning vandals and justifying your opinions on XfD discussions with reference to policies and guidelines. In the two months since your RfA took place, I can see that you have made substantial and successful attempts to communicate with vandals and to back your opinions up with policies.  I really like editors who do this as it makes it easy for me and any other person to instantly review your reasoning in order to support you - no one has to redo your work as all of your working-out is included! On this basis, using your current performance as a baseline, I would have no problem in supporting you if you decide to go for another RfA in the New Year.  Even if you don't, this is the sort of performance that new editors should be able to look at and  use as a model for their own Wiki-careers.  I hope that this information is useful to you. Regards and happy editing,  +++$+++ :Good afternoon Brad, or should I say ''konishiwa'' as you appear to be in Tokyo as I type this?  I have reviewed your last five hundred edits in the user Talk and Wikipedia spaces, as they are the areas that I made a particular point of noting at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FBradBeattie&diff=82289846&oldid=82287580 your RfA]. My particular concerns were to do with warning vandals and justifying your opinions on XfD discussions with reference to policies and guidelines. In the two months since your RfA took place, I can see that you have made substantial and successful attempts to communicate with vandals and to back your opinions up with policies.  I really like editors who do this as it makes it easy for me and any other person to instantly review your reasoning in order to support you - no one has to redo your work as all of your working-out is included! On this basis, using your current performance as a baseline, I would have no problem in supporting you if you decide to go for another RfA in the New Year.  Even if you don't, this is the sort of performance that new editors should be able to look at and  use as a model for their own Wiki-careers.  I hope that this information is useful to you. Regards and happy editing, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 17:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

8195 +++$+++ Tiddly Tom +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8195 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-21 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.193012880E09 +++$+++ | <center> You have been placed on the '''Inactive''' members list. If you would like to continue contributing to the project, please move your name back onto the active members list [[Wikipedia:WikiProject BBC#Members|here]]. Thank You, <span style=\"border:2px solid #483C32;\"> +++$+++ | <center> You have been placed on the '''Inactive''' members list. If you would like to continue contributing to the project, please move your name back onto the active members list [[Wikipedia:WikiProject BBC#Members|here]]. Thank You, <span style="border:2px solid #483C32;">[[User:Tiddly Tom|<font style="color:#7FFF00;background:#483C32;">'''Tiddly</font><font style="color:#483C32;background:#483C32;">-</font><font style="color:#DFFF00;background:#483C32;">Tom'''</font>]]</span> 17:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
8196 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8195 +++$+++ 8195 +++$+++ 2007-10-21 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.192999440E09 +++$+++ Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, such as the one you made to [[:{{{1}}}]],}} did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed.  Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->|Article [[Loire Valley]]   +++$+++ :Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, such as the one you made to [[:{{{1}}}]],}} did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed.  Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->|Article [[Loire Valley]]  [[User:Kathleen.wright5|Kathleen.wright5]] 13:44, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

8198 +++$+++ Tiddly Tom +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 08:33:00 +++$+++ 1.193239980E09 +++$+++ Hopefully I have done what you wanted, you can see it by clicking the link above. <span style=\"border:2px solid #483C32;\"> +++$+++ Hopefully I have done what you wanted, you can see it by clicking the link above. <span style="border:2px solid #483C32;">[[User:Tiddly Tom|<font style="color:#7FFF00;background:#483C32;">'''Tiddly</font><font style="color:#483C32;background:#483C32;">-</font><font style="color:#DFFF00;background:#483C32;">Tom'''</font>]]</span> 08:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
8199 +++$+++ Tiddly Tom +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8198 +++$+++ 8198 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 08:44:00 +++$+++ 1.193240640E09 +++$+++ Hehe, no problem. Come back and speak to me if I can help you with anything else, <span style=\"border:2px solid #483C32;\"> +++$+++ : Hehe, no problem. Come back and speak to me if I can help you with anything else, <span style="border:2px solid #483C32;">[[User:Tiddly Tom|<font style="color:#7FFF00;background:#483C32;">'''Tiddly</font><font style="color:#483C32;background:#483C32;">-</font><font style="color:#DFFF00;background:#483C32;">Tom'''</font>]]</span> 08:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

270343 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-26 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.246055100E09 +++$+++ sorry again that I dropped out of the mentoring thing. Had to...  +++$+++ sorry again that I dropped out of the mentoring thing. Had to... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 15:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
270344 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270343 +++$+++ 270343 +++$+++ 2009-06-26 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.246055460E09 +++$+++ That's ok. I still consider you \"in\". I implemented your suggestion of a list of \"stressful situations\" and doing so has already been useful to me. There is plenty of time for you to help me out more. I value your judgment. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :That's ok. I still consider you "in". I implemented your suggestion of a list of "stressful situations" and doing so has already been useful to me. There is plenty of time for you to help me out more. I value your judgment. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

8201 +++$+++ Sseballos +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.193798040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Sseballos|Sseballos]] 19:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
8202 +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8201 +++$+++ 8201 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.194957480E09 +++$+++ When specifying a value for the \"date\" parameter in a maintenance tag (such as {{tl|locateme}}), please remember to specify the month ''and'' the year, to ensure that pages are placed into the proper categories. Thanks, ''' +++$+++ :When specifying a value for the "date" parameter in a maintenance tag (such as {{tl|locateme}}), please remember to specify the month ''and'' the year, to ensure that pages are placed into the proper categories. Thanks, '''[[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Black Falcon|Talk]])</sup> 04:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

532490 +++$+++ Cool Cat +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-12 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.144894560E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the fix. --<small> +++$+++ Thank you for the fix. --<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cool Cat]]<sup>[[User talk:Cool Cat|Talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Cool Cat|@]]</sup></small> 19:16, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
532491 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532490 +++$+++ 532490 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.144894680E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. I hope you find some time to expand the article. Regards, --[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : You're welcome. I hope you find some time to expand the article. Regards, --[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]] 19:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
532492 +++$+++ Cool Cat +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532490 +++$+++ 532491 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.144895040E09 +++$+++ I was hoping you would join the quest... --<small> +++$+++ ::I was hoping you would join the quest... --<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cool Cat]]<sup>[[User talk:Cool Cat|Talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Cool Cat|@]]</sup></small> 19:24, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
532493 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532490 +++$+++ 532492 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.144895100E09 +++$+++ Depends on the time. Why not. --[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ ::: Depends on the time. Why not. --[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]] 19:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
532494 +++$+++ Cool Cat +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532490 +++$+++ 532493 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.144896180E09 +++$+++ episodes after the recap are in a stub state. I do not have the courage to write those, I wrote the previous ones. I'd like help with those as well as various character pages... --<small> +++$+++ ::::episodes after the recap are in a stub state. I do not have the courage to write those, I wrote the previous ones. I'd like help with those as well as various character pages... --<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cool Cat]]<sup>[[User talk:Cool Cat|Talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Cool Cat|@]]</sup></small> 19:43, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

8203 +++$+++ BD2412 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-15 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.195151040E09 +++$+++ Hey! Just wanted to say that I'm pleased as punch to see you're doing some work on this. I started this project years ago, and kind of lost sight of it. But I think it's a good and important thing to keep track of templates with red links for many reasons (not the least of which is avoiding junk!) I'd like to see the project rebooted from the most recent database dump. What do you think? Cheers!  +++$+++ Hey! Just wanted to say that I'm pleased as punch to see you're doing some work on this. I started this project years ago, and kind of lost sight of it. But I think it's a good and important thing to keep track of templates with red links for many reasons (not the least of which is avoiding junk!) I'd like to see the project rebooted from the most recent database dump. What do you think? Cheers! [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:gold">'''''bd2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 10:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
8204 +++$+++ BD2412 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8203 +++$+++ 8203 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 08:47:00 +++$+++ 1.195231620E09 +++$+++ I have asked Beland (the techie who set it up in the first place) to reboot. So, hopefully there will soon be a brand new and up to date list of templates with redlinks to work from. I will offer you whatever guidance I can from my previous experience working on this project. Cheers again!  +++$+++ :I have asked Beland (the techie who set it up in the first place) to reboot. So, hopefully there will soon be a brand new and up to date list of templates with redlinks to work from. I will offer you whatever guidance I can from my previous experience working on this project. Cheers again! [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:gold">'''''bd2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 08:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
8205 +++$+++ BD2412 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8203 +++$+++ 8204 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.196858940E09 +++$+++ Hey, [[Wikipedia:Templates with red links]] is officially up and running anew - check out the seventy-seven pages of templates with redlinks generated in the most recent database dump! You are now (as of this moment) officially in charge of this project. Congratulations, and cheers!  +++$+++ ::Hey, [[Wikipedia:Templates with red links]] is officially up and running anew - check out the seventy-seven pages of templates with redlinks generated in the most recent database dump! You are now (as of this moment) officially in charge of this project. Congratulations, and cheers! [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:gold">'''''bd2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 04:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

569346 +++$+++ Krasniy +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.165985460E09 +++$+++ I figure I should expand a bit with my contributions. What do I need to know to get involved into Afds? Could you provide me with some links or anything useful so I can know what to do and how to do it right? I figure I'll read up on it and try my hand at it later in the week. Thanks! \u2248 +++$+++ I figure I should expand a bit with my contributions. What do I need to know to get involved into Afds? Could you provide me with some links or anything useful so I can know what to do and how to do it right? I figure I'll read up on it and try my hand at it later in the week. Thanks! ≈[[User:Krasniy|<span style="color: rgb(130, 0,0);">Krasniy</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Krasniy|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Krasniy|contribs]])</sup> 20:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
569347 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569346 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.165988040E09 +++$+++ '''Delete''' Non-notable biography as per the criteria set out in [[:WP:BIO]].  +++$+++ ::*'''Delete''' Non-notable biography as per the criteria set out in [[:WP:BIO]]. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
569348 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569346 +++$+++ 569346 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.165988040E09 +++$+++ That way, if anyone disagrees with you and tries to tell you otherwise, you can be sure that your opinion was based upon one of the key sections of WP - it's their problem, not your problem! So, to summarise - 1) read the AfD discussions, 2) follow the work of editors who quote policy in their opinions and 3) read and become familiar with the policies and guidelines. This will take a few months, so don't treat it like a University Finals exam! Regards,  +++$+++ :That way, if anyone disagrees with you and tries to tell you otherwise, you can be sure that your opinion was based upon one of the key sections of WP - it's their problem, not your problem! So, to summarise - 1) read the AfD discussions, 2) follow the work of editors who quote policy in their opinions and 3) read and become familiar with the policies and guidelines. This will take a few months, so don't treat it like a University Finals exam! Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
569349 +++$+++ Krasniy +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569346 +++$+++ 569348 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.165990200E09 +++$+++ Oh don't talk about finals! I just finished those. ha :cP Thanks, I'll start looking into this and checking out old AfDs. \u2248 +++$+++ ::Oh don't talk about finals! I just finished those. ha :cP Thanks, I'll start looking into this and checking out old AfDs. ≈[[User:Krasniy|<span style="color: rgb(130, 0,0);">Krasniy</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Krasniy|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Krasniy|contribs]])</sup> 22:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

8206 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-07 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.197044520E09 +++$+++ Please don't add to the P's in C category people who are already in the sub-cat [[:Category:Prophets of the Hebrew Bible]].  Thank you.  +++$+++ Please don't add to the P's in C category people who are already in the sub-cat [[:Category:Prophets of the Hebrew Bible]].  Thank you. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 08:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
8207 +++$+++ Fayenatic_london +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8206 +++$+++ 8206 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.197061980E09 +++$+++ The main point of the Hebrew Bible categories is to avoid unnecessary duplication of categories for subjects that are relevant to both Judaism and Christianity. I hope this is helpful. -  +++$+++ :The main point of the Hebrew Bible categories is to avoid unnecessary duplication of categories for subjects that are relevant to both Judaism and Christianity. I hope this is helpful. - [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User_talk:Fayenatic_london|(talk)]] 13:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
8208 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8206 +++$+++ 8207 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.197090180E09 +++$+++ Ok, many thanks for that. I'm not sure how reliable that 2nd group are - it has [[Nebuchadrezzar II]] but what about all his dinner-guests?  +++$+++ ::Ok, many thanks for that. I'm not sure how reliable that 2nd group are - it has [[Nebuchadrezzar II]] but what about all his dinner-guests? [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 21:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

532496 +++$+++ Tobyk777 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-14 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.145073120E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  With, the way it's last FA nomination looked I almost decided to give up, but since then it's made massive progress.  I will move it to the A list.  Right now, It's also a [[WP:GA|Good Article]] canidate.  It has not been approved yet.  It would be good someone approved it.  As for it being a FA; I thought that subject matter had nothing to do with it.  I thought that WP's plolicy was that FAs are judged by the quality of the article, not the subject they're on.   +++$+++ Thanks.  With, the way it's last FA nomination looked I almost decided to give up, but since then it's made massive progress.  I will move it to the A list.  Right now, It's also a [[WP:GA|Good Article]] canidate.  It has not been approved yet.  It would be good someone approved it.  As for it being a FA; I thought that subject matter had nothing to do with it.  I thought that WP's plolicy was that FAs are judged by the quality of the article, not the subject they're on.  [[User:Tobyk777|Tobyk777]] 20:52, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
532497 +++$+++ Tobyk777 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532496 +++$+++ 532496 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.145076360E09 +++$+++ There already is lots of info about the real world in this article.  There are sections for other fictional works, the prop, and its plausibility in real life.  There is nothing more that can be added.  It's 100% complete.  It exhausts the topic.  [[User:BrianSmithson\/Writing about fiction]] states that articles should be written from an out of universe perspective.  After I read his argument, I agreed, so I reworded the whole thing to be out of universe.  Does it still sound in universe to you?  If it does ill fix it.  Also, I don't know what you mean when you say: \"is not so widely used  as Stargate or some weapons in the series. So I suggest it stays as it is\"   +++$+++ :There already is lots of info about the real world in this article.  There are sections for other fictional works, the prop, and its plausibility in real life.  There is nothing more that can be added.  It's 100% complete.  It exhausts the topic.  [[User:BrianSmithson/Writing about fiction]] states that articles should be written from an out of universe perspective.  After I read his argument, I agreed, so I reworded the whole thing to be out of universe.  Does it still sound in universe to you?  If it does ill fix it.  Also, I don't know what you mean when you say: "is not so widely used  as Stargate or some weapons in the series. So I suggest it stays as it is"  [[User:Tobyk777|Tobyk777]] 21:46, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

263512 +++$+++ Lightdarkness +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263512 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-21 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.148250420E09 +++$+++ Hi there.  Maybe I'm not fully understanding what a ''publicity'' photo is, but I'm sure that [[:Image:Michael Rose.jpg]] can fall under another fair use blanket (but a fair use rationale is needed regardless).  As for [[:Image:Facade.jpg]], just change the tag to tv-screenshot, and give a fair use rationale, and it should be fine.  Thanks. --<b><font color=\"666666\">[[User:Lightdarkness|light]]<\/font><font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ Hi there.  Maybe I'm not fully understanding what a ''publicity'' photo is, but I'm sure that [[:Image:Michael Rose.jpg]] can fall under another fair use blanket (but a fair use rationale is needed regardless).  As for [[:Image:Facade.jpg]], just change the tag to tv-screenshot, and give a fair use rationale, and it should be fine.  Thanks. --<b><font color="666666">[[User:Lightdarkness|light]]</font><font color="#000000">[[User:Lightdarkness|darkness]]</font></b><sup> ([[User_talk:Lightdarkness|talk]])</sup> 15:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
263513 +++$+++ Lightdarkness +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263512 +++$+++ 263512 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.148320920E09 +++$+++ Then perhaps the best thing to do here, is tag them with {{tl|Non-free fair use in}} and give a rationale, or remove them from the articles. --<b><font color=\"666666\">[[User:Lightdarkness|light]]<\/font><font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Then perhaps the best thing to do here, is tag them with {{tl|Non-free fair use in}} and give a rationale, or remove them from the articles. --<b><font color="666666">[[User:Lightdarkness|light]]</font><font color="#000000">[[User:Lightdarkness|darkness]]</font></b><sup> ([[User_talk:Lightdarkness|talk]])</sup> 11:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
263514 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263512 +++$+++ 263512 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.148317680E09 +++$+++ I have never been incivil to you, Ben. It is a pity you a choosing to damage your previously good reputation by acting in such a way.  +++$+++ :I have never been incivil to you, Ben. It is a pity you a choosing to damage your previously good reputation by acting in such a way. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:08, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
263515 +++$+++ Feydey +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263512 +++$+++ 263512 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.148412060E09 +++$+++ Adding \"Scottish paki-poof\" is not civil.  +++$+++ :Adding "Scottish paki-poof" is not civil. [[User:Feydey|feydey]] 12:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
263516 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263512 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.148419200E09 +++$+++ Oh, right. I'd still be careful about how to use them. Some people can be very offended by both words. If it is to be included, then it is vital that it be rephrased and sourced (...he describes himself as... [source to external URL]) so that it is not misconstrued again as vandalism. I'm suprised that Channel 4 allowed 'paki' to be broadcast in a frivolous way.  +++$+++ :::Oh, right. I'd still be careful about how to use them. Some people can be very offended by both words. If it is to be included, then it is vital that it be rephrased and sourced (...he describes himself as... [source to external URL]) so that it is not misconstrued again as vandalism. I'm suprised that Channel 4 allowed 'paki' to be broadcast in a frivolous way. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:20, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

8210 +++$+++ Tiddly Tom +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-10 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.197340620E09 +++$+++ Hey :) I notice you have been adding the banner to some of the talk pages of articles currently not covered by the project, Thank you! If you like, feel free to also [[Wikipedia:WikiProject BBC\/Assessment|assess]] them when adding them to the talk pages. It does not take long to get the idea of the assessment system. Doing the assessment at the same time as tagging takes a lot less time than tagging the page, and then someone else assessing them. If you don't want to, you don't have to, just an idea for if you had not thought about it. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Thanks again, <span style=\"border:2px solid #483C32;\"> +++$+++ Hey :) I notice you have been adding the banner to some of the talk pages of articles currently not covered by the project, Thank you! If you like, feel free to also [[Wikipedia:WikiProject BBC/Assessment|assess]] them when adding them to the talk pages. It does not take long to get the idea of the assessment system. Doing the assessment at the same time as tagging takes a lot less time than tagging the page, and then someone else assessing them. If you don't want to, you don't have to, just an idea for if you had not thought about it. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Thanks again, <span style="border:2px solid #483C32;">[[User:Tiddly Tom|<font style="color:#7FFF00;background:#483C32;">'''Tiddly</font><font style="color:#483C32;background:#483C32;">-</font><font style="color:#DFFF00;background:#483C32;">Tom'''</font>]]</span> 18:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
8211 +++$+++ Tiddly Tom +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8210 +++$+++ 8210 +++$+++ 2007-12-11 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.197385440E09 +++$+++ The ''|importance='' parameter still remains. Also, for people to assess articles they will look [[:Category:Unassessed BBC articles|here]]. How are they to know, without looking through all the articles which need to be assessed and which don't? I am not saying you have to, but just explaining the consequences fully for other editors. <span style=\"border:2px solid #483C32;\"> +++$+++ : The ''|importance='' parameter still remains. Also, for people to assess articles they will look [[:Category:Unassessed BBC articles|here]]. How are they to know, without looking through all the articles which need to be assessed and which don't? I am not saying you have to, but just explaining the consequences fully for other editors. <span style="border:2px solid #483C32;">[[User:Tiddly Tom|<font style="color:#7FFF00;background:#483C32;">'''Tiddly</font><font style="color:#483C32;background:#483C32;">-</font><font style="color:#DFFF00;background:#483C32;">Tom'''</font>]]</span> 07:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

8212 +++$+++ Itsmejudith +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8212 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-14 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.197661740E09 +++$+++ Hi Kathleen, lovely to hear from you. I'd say it can be discharged from ICU. I wouldn't take all the tags off though. It has many references now but could do with more. We could keep on the tag for an expert too. And the merger could be done. A good example of improvement through co-operation I'd say. ICU can move on to the more difficult cases. All the best.  +++$+++ Hi Kathleen, lovely to hear from you. I'd say it can be discharged from ICU. I wouldn't take all the tags off though. It has many references now but could do with more. We could keep on the tag for an expert too. And the merger could be done. A good example of improvement through co-operation I'd say. ICU can move on to the more difficult cases. All the best. [[User:Itsmejudith|Itsmejudith]] ([[User talk:Itsmejudith|talk]]) 11:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
8213 +++$+++ Itsmejudith +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8212 +++$+++ 8212 +++$+++ 2007-12-15 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.197737760E09 +++$+++ I'll help you on that article. But we have a more general problem that the initial enthusiasm for the ICU seems to have waned. Either the original members have to start paying attention again or we have to get some new members. How about if you and I jointly write a message to all the members gently chivvying them up?  +++$+++ :I'll help you on that article. But we have a more general problem that the initial enthusiasm for the ICU seems to have waned. Either the original members have to start paying attention again or we have to get some new members. How about if you and I jointly write a message to all the members gently chivvying them up? [[User:Itsmejudith|Itsmejudith]] ([[User talk:Itsmejudith|talk]]) 08:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
8214 +++$+++ Itsmejudith +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8212 +++$+++ 8213 +++$+++ 2007-12-15 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.197738480E09 +++$+++ Specifically in regard to Esanda, I don't think it meets the notability criteria. I can't find any non-trivial external references to it. It gets 815 google hits but most are listings in business directories. Can we agree to tag it for merge with its parent company?  +++$+++ ::Specifically in regard to Esanda, I don't think it meets the notability criteria. I can't find any non-trivial external references to it. It gets 815 google hits but most are listings in business directories. Can we agree to tag it for merge with its parent company? [[User:Itsmejudith|Itsmejudith]] ([[User talk:Itsmejudith|talk]]) 09:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
8215 +++$+++ Itsmejudith +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8212 +++$+++ 8213 +++$+++ 2007-12-15 09:17:00 +++$+++ 1.197739020E09 +++$+++ How about a joky message \"Calling all clinicians! Can you help clear the Intensive Care Unit backlog? Some patients are lingering in the unit and the beds are needed for new urgent cases. Please come and use your bold editing skills.\" And we would also add a message to the ICU talk page explaining that we felt that a backlog was developing and that was why we needed to send the message. What do you think?  +++$+++ ::How about a joky message "Calling all clinicians! Can you help clear the Intensive Care Unit backlog? Some patients are lingering in the unit and the beds are needed for new urgent cases. Please come and use your bold editing skills." And we would also add a message to the ICU talk page explaining that we felt that a backlog was developing and that was why we needed to send the message. What do you think? [[User:Itsmejudith|Itsmejudith]] ([[User talk:Itsmejudith|talk]]) 09:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

532501 +++$+++ Celestianpower +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532501 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-23 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.145850120E09 +++$+++ Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that [[WP:ESP\/EL|the elections]] are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on [[2006-04-29]]. Please vote [[Wikipedia:Esperanza\/April 2006 elections\/vote|here]]. Thanks. --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Celestianpower\/Esperanza|es]]<\/font> +++$+++ Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that [[WP:ESP/EL|the elections]] are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on [[2006-04-29]]. Please vote [[Wikipedia:Esperanza/April 2006 elections/vote|here]]. Thanks. --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color="green">[[User:Celestianpower/Esperanza|es]]</font>[[User:Celestianpower|tianpower]] <sup>[[user talk:Celestianpower|háblame]]</sup> 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
532502 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532501 +++$+++ 532501 +++$+++ 2006-04-23 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.145854800E09 +++$+++ Already did. I might support some more people in time. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : Already did. I might support some more people in time. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 22:00, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

532503 +++$+++ Rockero +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-23 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.145860140E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to express my gratitude for your support in my RfA. And thanks for the advice. 8)-- +++$+++ Just wanted to express my gratitude for your support in my RfA. And thanks for the advice. 8)--[[User:Rockero|Rockero]] 23:29, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
532504 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532503 +++$+++ 532503 +++$+++ 2006-04-24 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.145908620E09 +++$+++ De nada :-) --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : De nada :-) --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 12:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

8216 +++$+++ Kbthompson +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8216 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-18 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.198007280E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you've been busy adding {{t1|WPE}} to lots of London stuff. I've given up arguing against parent project tagging of their offshoots! - but, since everyone is now multiply tagging London articles, could I ask you to use {{t1|WikiProjectBannerShell}} to collapse the banners, we have a ridiculous situation where many articles now have more adopters than sections in the articles. Cheers  +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you've been busy adding {{t1|WPE}} to lots of London stuff. I've given up arguing against parent project tagging of their offshoots! - but, since everyone is now multiply tagging London articles, could I ask you to use {{t1|WikiProjectBannerShell}} to collapse the banners, we have a ridiculous situation where many articles now have more adopters than sections in the articles. Cheers [[User:Kbthompson|Kbthompson]] ([[User talk:Kbthompson|talk]]) 11:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
8217 +++$+++ Kbthompson +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8216 +++$+++ 8216 +++$+++ 2007-12-18 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.198050060E09 +++$+++ Thank you, much appreciated ... hopefully the next round - architects, I reckon - will have the good grace to use the BannerShell, and not just 'bot' the lot ... cheers, and good luck with your corner of wiki.  +++$+++ :Thank you, much appreciated ... hopefully the next round - architects, I reckon - will have the good grace to use the BannerShell, and not just 'bot' the lot ... cheers, and good luck with your corner of wiki. [[User:Kbthompson|Kbthompson]] ([[User talk:Kbthompson|talk]]) 23:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

8218 +++$+++ BobClive +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-05 07:31:00 +++$+++ 1.199547060E09 +++$+++ WISH YOU A HAPPY AND ACTIVE NEW YEAR.-- +++$+++ WISH YOU A HAPPY AND ACTIVE NEW YEAR.--[[User:BobClive|BobClive]] ([[User talk:BobClive|talk]]) 07:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
8219 +++$+++ BobClive +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8218 +++$+++ 8218 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.199923440E09 +++$+++ What a coincidence, 26 January! Thanks for the information.-- +++$+++ :What a coincidence, 26 January! Thanks for the information.--[[User:BobClive|BobClive]] ([[User talk:BobClive|talk]]) 16:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

8223 +++$+++ Pegship +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-27 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.201423920E09 +++$+++ Hi there, and thanks for tackling the stub categories. If you need guidance on how to format them (or templates), take a look at [[Wikipedia:Stub#New_stub_templates|the main stub page]] or ask on the talk page (where you were before). Welcome to it - Cheers!  +++$+++ Hi there, and thanks for tackling the stub categories. If you need guidance on how to format them (or templates), take a look at [[Wikipedia:Stub#New_stub_templates|the main stub page]] or ask on the talk page (where you were before). Welcome to it - Cheers! [[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]] <small><font color="green">[[User talk:Pegship| (tis herself)]]</font></small> 00:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
8224 +++$+++ Pegship +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8223 +++$+++ 8223 +++$+++ 2008-01-28 05:16:00 +++$+++ 1.201526160E09 +++$+++ No problem - I'll take a look tomorrow (I'm in California). Usually the template is created first, then the category; more on that later. G'night!  +++$+++ :No problem - I'll take a look tomorrow (I'm in California). Usually the template is created first, then the category; more on that later. G'night! [[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]] <small><font color="green">[[User talk:Pegship| (tis herself)]]</font></small> 05:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

270368 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-28 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.246243200E09 +++$+++ This article has already had some good work throughout this years, but has not been nominated to GA due to minor doubts about grammar. A user has already made some copy-edit, but there are still. Could you check it up if you have some free time? It's a bit longer than Yahiko's article, but it seems to have been worked more in prose. Regards. +++$+++ This article has already had some good work throughout this years, but has not been nominated to GA due to minor doubts about grammar. A user has already made some copy-edit, but there are still. Could you check it up if you have some free time? It's a bit longer than Yahiko's article, but it seems to have been worked more in prose. Regards.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 19:40, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
270369 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270368 +++$+++ 270368 +++$+++ 2009-06-29 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.246266000E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision&diff=prev&oldid=299227964 Here is Ling.Nut].  +++$+++ * [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision&diff=prev&oldid=299227964 Here is Ling.Nut]. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 02:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

8225 +++$+++ NapoliRoma +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8225 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-28 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.201560840E09 +++$+++ I can't find any evidence that Context MBA was ever available for the Mac, just for the pre-Mac Apple III.  Should this be reverted, or alternatively, do you have anything that can be added to the article that discusses this?-- +++$+++ I can't find any evidence that Context MBA was ever available for the Mac, just for the pre-Mac Apple III.  Should this be reverted, or alternatively, do you have anything that can be added to the article that discusses this?--[[User:NapoliRoma|NapoliRoma]] ([[User talk:NapoliRoma|talk]]) 14:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
8226 +++$+++ NapoliRoma +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8225 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-29 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.201597800E09 +++$+++ Thanks!-- +++$+++ ::Thanks!--[[User:NapoliRoma|NapoliRoma]] ([[User talk:NapoliRoma|talk]]) 01:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

270370 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-29 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.246315260E09 +++$+++ My advice, for what it's worth, is to remove the section you've added about \"aspersions cast by Tony1\". I can see that you firmly believe in the truth of what you're saying, but it's really sending out the wrong message IMO, or is at best open to misinterpretation. Some may view it as a getting your excuses in first, for instance, a reluctance to accept your own responsibility for events. Sometimes it's best just to bite your tongue. -- +++$+++ My advice, for what it's worth, is to remove the section you've added about "aspersions cast by Tony1". I can see that you firmly believe in the truth of what you're saying, but it's really sending out the wrong message IMO, or is at best open to misinterpretation. Some may view it as a getting your excuses in first, for instance, a reluctance to accept your own responsibility for events. Sometimes it's best just to bite your tongue. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 15:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
270371 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ 2009-06-29 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.246318680E09 +++$+++ I understand your point. Yet aspersions cast on me  is the basis of almost the entire case against me in the Major Depression RFC, the ANI leading to the Arbitration, and the Arbitration itself. If this type of behavior was not routine regarding me, there would not have an arbitration covering my three years at Wikipedia based on only a kernal of legitimate incidents, which I acknowledge, but  the preponderance of \"evidence\" was in the category of \"aspersions cast by Tony1\".  His casting of aspersions, although without merit, are repeated over and over by those editors vested in my down fall, then taken up and reiterated by their affiliates\/cohorts. Even after the entire legitimacy of the original aspersion is disproved, no one bothers to look into the facts afterward. This is a very serious situation and is the core of my problems on Wikipedia. If it cannot be stopped, if people cannot be held responsible when then cast aspersions, as I have been, then this whole arbitration has a double standard and  is hopeless. That fact may as well be acknowledged now, before we waste any more time on it. Have you ever really  gone through the reams of evidence against me to see if it was valid? Those that have, like SilkTorn, see that largely it is not. Did you know that RFC1 and RFC2 against me were entirely without merit?  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I understand your point. Yet aspersions cast on me  is the basis of almost the entire case against me in the Major Depression RFC, the ANI leading to the Arbitration, and the Arbitration itself. If this type of behavior was not routine regarding me, there would not have an arbitration covering my three years at Wikipedia based on only a kernal of legitimate incidents, which I acknowledge, but  the preponderance of "evidence" was in the category of "aspersions cast by Tony1".  His casting of aspersions, although without merit, are repeated over and over by those editors vested in my down fall, then taken up and reiterated by their affiliates/cohorts. Even after the entire legitimacy of the original aspersion is disproved, no one bothers to look into the facts afterward. This is a very serious situation and is the core of my problems on Wikipedia. If it cannot be stopped, if people cannot be held responsible when then cast aspersions, as I have been, then this whole arbitration has a double standard and  is hopeless. That fact may as well be acknowledged now, before we waste any more time on it. Have you ever really  gone through the reams of evidence against me to see if it was valid? Those that have, like SilkTorn, see that largely it is not. Did you know that RFC1 and RFC2 against me were entirely without merit?  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
270372 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ 270371 +++$+++ 2009-06-29 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.246319460E09 +++$+++ The important issue here is the impression you're giving of how you react to such perceived injustices, and an unwillingness to let the past be the past. How long ago was RfC1, for instance? Don't offer people rocks and them complain when they throw them at you. Nothing can change what's happened, but you ''can'' at least influence what's going to happen. I'm just offering my opinion though, perhaps others may see more merit in this apparent refusal to let bygones be bygones than I do. -- +++$+++ ::The important issue here is the impression you're giving of how you react to such perceived injustices, and an unwillingness to let the past be the past. How long ago was RfC1, for instance? Don't offer people rocks and them complain when they throw them at you. Nothing can change what's happened, but you ''can'' at least influence what's going to happen. I'm just offering my opinion though, perhaps others may see more merit in this apparent refusal to let bygones be bygones than I do. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 16:51, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
270373 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ 270372 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.246490220E09 +++$+++ OK, the general point is well taken.  I am willing to let bygones by bygones, but are others? To answer your question,  RfC1 was 2 1\/2 years ago, but it was the trigger for the arbitration because [[User:Cirt|Cirt]]'s AN\/I thread that provoked the Arbitration  used it to prove  many RfC's had not solved the problem of me. This resulted directly in me being blocked indefinitely by [[User:Tznkai|Tznkai]], and in the Request for Arbitration by [[User:Durova|Durova]], and  by several editors to show I was incorrigible. Are you saying that it will never be used unjustly again?  Or that  [[User:Tony1|Tony]]'s aspersion will never be used against me? Should I not dare, in the future, to ask for reliable references on an article talk page in case the editor flips out and characterizes me inaccurately, and Tony or someone like him wants to use it against me? Perhaps it is just too risky.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::OK, the general point is well taken.  I am willing to let bygones by bygones, but are others? To answer your question,  RfC1 was 2 1/2 years ago, but it was the trigger for the arbitration because [[User:Cirt|Cirt]]'s AN/I thread that provoked the Arbitration  used it to prove  many RfC's had not solved the problem of me. This resulted directly in me being blocked indefinitely by [[User:Tznkai|Tznkai]], and in the Request for Arbitration by [[User:Durova|Durova]], and  by several editors to show I was incorrigible. Are you saying that it will never be used unjustly again?  Or that  [[User:Tony1|Tony]]'s aspersion will never be used against me? Should I not dare, in the future, to ask for reliable references on an article talk page in case the editor flips out and characterizes me inaccurately, and Tony or someone like him wants to use it against me? Perhaps it is just too risky.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270374 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ 270373 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.246493700E09 +++$+++ No, I'm simply saying try to be bigger than those you believe are holding grudges against you, not the same size as them. My block log is not infrequently used as evidence against me, and in particular of my alleged \"incivility\", but do I care? Not a whit; I just consider those shallow enough not to examine the facts to be twats hardly worth bothering about. And if I may say so that's got to be the way forward for you as well. Who cares who said what when? You can't change the past, I can't change the past, but maybe we can help change the future. -- +++$+++ ::::No, I'm simply saying try to be bigger than those you believe are holding grudges against you, not the same size as them. My block log is not infrequently used as evidence against me, and in particular of my alleged "incivility", but do I care? Not a whit; I just consider those shallow enough not to examine the facts to be twats hardly worth bothering about. And if I may say so that's got to be the way forward for you as well. Who cares who said what when? You can't change the past, I can't change the past, but maybe we can help change the future. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 17:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270375 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ 270373 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.246498800E09 +++$+++ The, as Malleus says, you can get credit for being \"bigger than those you believe are holding grudges against you\" - but still ready to zap them if they give serious trouble. -- +++$+++ ::::The, as Malleus says, you can get credit for being "bigger than those you believe are holding grudges against you" - but still ready to zap them if they give serious trouble. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 18:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270376 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ 270375 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.246501560E09 +++$+++ As my hero Oliver Cromwell is reported to have said: \"Trust in God, and keep your powder dry.\" Personally I'd said, \"... ''but'' keep your powder dry\". -- +++$+++ :::::As my hero Oliver Cromwell is reported to have said: "Trust in God, and keep your powder dry." Personally I'd said, "... ''but'' keep your powder dry". --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 19:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270377 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ 270376 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.246502940E09 +++$+++ People seem to come up with stuff I can't find anyway. I have enough trouble keeping track of My plan and the arbitration links. I have nearly 3000 pages on my watchlist. I can't feature keeping things on my hard drive. My life is complicated enough.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::People seem to come up with stuff I can't find anyway. I have enough trouble keeping track of My plan and the arbitration links. I have nearly 3000 pages on my watchlist. I can't feature keeping things on my hard drive. My life is complicated enough.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270378 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ 270377 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.246503360E09 +++$+++ I thought I had a lot, perhaps too many, at 570 on my watchlist. Time for a clearout? -- +++$+++ :::::::I thought I had a lot, perhaps too many, at 570 on my watchlist. Time for a clearout? --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 19:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270379 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ 270378 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.246504260E09 +++$+++ I cleaned it out a little just recently. I would have to actually remember things if I cleaned it out more. Some pages I would not know how to find if they did not crop up on my watchlist. I'm always sorry after when I remove one of those.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::I cleaned it out a little just recently. I would have to actually remember things if I cleaned it out more. Some pages I would not know how to find if they did not crop up on my watchlist. I'm always sorry after when I remove one of those.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:11, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270380 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ 270379 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.246504800E09 +++$+++ I'm more often sorry when I don't, like [[WP:ANI]] for instance, but each to their own. -- +++$+++ :::::::::I'm more often sorry when I don't, like [[WP:ANI]] for instance, but each to their own. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 20:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270381 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270370 +++$+++ 270380 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.246505880E09 +++$+++ I don't have that kind of thing on my watchlist. If I'm being discussed there, I will find out soon enough. Also, I checked and I only have 1900 on my watchlist. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::I don't have that kind of thing on my watchlist. If I'm being discussed there, I will find out soon enough. Also, I checked and I only have 1900 on my watchlist. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

8228 +++$+++ Pairadox +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-05 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.202201520E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add content without [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|citing]] [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|reliable sources]]{{#if:Virgo (astrology)|, as you did to [[:Virgo (astrology)]]}}. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page.  If you are familiar with [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article.  Contact me if you need assistance adding references. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> These articles are enough of a mess without established editors adding unreferenced qualities.  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add content without [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|citing]] [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|reliable sources]]{{#if:Virgo (astrology)|, as you did to [[:Virgo (astrology)]]}}. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page.  If you are familiar with [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article.  Contact me if you need assistance adding references. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> These articles are enough of a mess without established editors adding unreferenced qualities. [[User:Pairadox|Pairadox]] ([[User talk:Pairadox|talk]]) 00:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
8229 +++$+++ Pairadox +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8228 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.202202060E09 +++$+++ Nope, and the same is applicable to ''all'' of the astrology articles (I just didn't want to give you twelve different warnings). Each instance needs to be sourced directly to a reliable, off-wiki source - Wikipedia can't use itself as a source.  +++$+++ ::Nope, and the same is applicable to ''all'' of the astrology articles (I just didn't want to give you twelve different warnings). Each instance needs to be sourced directly to a reliable, off-wiki source - Wikipedia can't use itself as a source. [[User:Pairadox|Pairadox]] ([[User talk:Pairadox|talk]]) 01:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
8230 +++$+++ Pairadox +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8228 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.202273040E09 +++$+++ So are you going to provide sources or am I going to remove your additions?  +++$+++ :::So are you going to provide sources or am I going to remove your additions? [[User:Pairadox|Pairadox]] ([[User talk:Pairadox|talk]]) 20:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
8231 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8228 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.202276700E09 +++$+++ Yes, you can remove the additions, but Virgo I added to someone else's work. Taurus and Sagittarius I did myself and Scorpio, Capricorn, Aquarius and Pices were done by other editors, which is why I thought it was OK to use the medical astrology link.  +++$+++ ::::Yes, you can remove the additions, but Virgo I added to someone else's work. Taurus and Sagittarius I did myself and Scorpio, Capricorn, Aquarius and Pices were done by other editors, which is why I thought it was OK to use the medical astrology link. [[User:Kathleen.wright5|Kathleen.wright5]] 21:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
8232 +++$+++ Pairadox +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8228 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.202277840E09 +++$+++ Understood. I really have no opinion on the info itself, I just want to make sure that it's tied to a third party source.  +++$+++ :::::Understood. I really have no opinion on the info itself, I just want to make sure that it's tied to a third party source. [[User:Pairadox|Pairadox]] ([[User talk:Pairadox|talk]]) 22:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

613041 +++$+++ CarpeScientia +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613041 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-22 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.203744060E09 +++$+++ Wow, sorry, my edit was actually a complete mistake, I thought I was doing exactly what you actually did. I misread your edit summary \"useful to its environment > useful to it in its environment\", thinking the  \">\" meant \"is better than\", as opposed to using it as an arrow, so I assumed you were doing exactly the opposite of what you were actually doing.  +++$+++ Wow, sorry, my edit was actually a complete mistake, I thought I was doing exactly what you actually did. I misread your edit summary "useful to its environment > useful to it in its environment", thinking the  ">" meant "is better than", as opposed to using it as an arrow, so I assumed you were doing exactly the opposite of what you were actually doing. [[User:CarpeScientia|CarpeScientia]] ([[User talk:CarpeScientia|talk]]) 21:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
613042 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613041 +++$+++ 613041 +++$+++ 2008-02-22 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.203744840E09 +++$+++ No problem, sorry that was rather ambiguous. Soon mended! Thanks for taking an interest, ..  +++$+++ :No problem, sorry that was rather ambiguous. Soon mended! Thanks for taking an interest, .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

532521 +++$+++ Shanel +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-13 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.147576920E09 +++$+++ When moving pages, don't do it so quickly, otherwise Curpsbot will block you.--''' +++$+++ When moving pages, don't do it so quickly, otherwise Curpsbot will block you.--'''[[User:Shanel|<font color="#CD2626">Shanel</font>]] [[User talk:Shanel|<sup><font color="#EE2C2C">§</font></sup>]]''' 20:22, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
532522 +++$+++ BrokenSegue +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532521 +++$+++ 532521 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.147578120E09 +++$+++ You are unblocked, but see [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Admin_issuing_threats_and_abusing_powers|this discussion]]. Not everyone agrees those moves are proper.  +++$+++ :You are unblocked, but see [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Admin_issuing_threats_and_abusing_powers|this discussion]]. Not everyone agrees those moves are proper. [[User:BrokenSegue|''B''roken]][[User talk:BrokenSegue|''S''egue]] 20:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

532523 +++$+++ 203.214.88.244 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-14 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.147645800E09 +++$+++ Another thing, are you going to adjust all the infoboxes to redirect the article titles you have displaced or are you going to leave it for others to do instead? I know redirections are not a big issue, and sorry to play devil's advocate, but haven't you just caused more (even if minor) problems?-- +++$+++ Another thing, are you going to adjust all the infoboxes to redirect the article titles you have displaced or are you going to leave it for others to do instead? I know redirections are not a big issue, and sorry to play devil's advocate, but haven't you just caused more (even if minor) problems?--[[User:203.214.88.244|203.214.88.244]] 15:30, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
532524 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532523 +++$+++ 532523 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.147646220E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Naming convention]]. The present state was that some episodes had the qualifiers and some not. I am proposing to have a uniform standard for naming the episodes. I know there are redirects now, I can fix them manually if there is no automated tool to do the job. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ :Please see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Naming convention]]. The present state was that some episodes had the qualifiers and some not. I am proposing to have a uniform standard for naming the episodes. I know there are redirects now, I can fix them manually if there is no automated tool to do the job. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 15:37, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
532525 +++$+++ 203.214.88.244 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532523 +++$+++ 532524 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.147646520E09 +++$+++ Alright, thanks for the reply. Consensus seems all very tentative, though.. I'm satisfied, nevertheless. Thanks anyways.. -- +++$+++ ::Alright, thanks for the reply. Consensus seems all very tentative, though.. I'm satisfied, nevertheless. Thanks anyways.. --[[User:203.214.88.244|203.214.88.244]] 15:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
532526 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532523 +++$+++ 532525 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.147646640E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I know it is hard to get a consensus but it's nevertheless worth trying. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ ::: Yeah, I know it is hard to get a consensus but it's nevertheless worth trying. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 15:44, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

481970 +++$+++ Tecmobowl +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-01 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.159692840E09 +++$+++ I am getting quite frustrated with this person.  He\/she refuses to engage in a conversation with me on his talk page about this.  He insists on trying to engage others in conversations about me, yet hypocritically reverts my comments on his page.  [[User:TBTA|TBTA]] was not driven off by me.  That user made ridiculous edits on [[Baseball card]] and refused to make accurate edits. I ended up having to do it for him.  I never once attacked you or anything you said until you started this harassment.  At that point I told you to go learn to read.  I believe there is nothing that will come of this, but I would like to be kept abrest of the topics if they are going to involve me.  The pages I have edited are mostly related to Baseball because that's what I am a fan of.  Of cours I'm going to react to being accused of this and deny the claims when they are untrue and totally uncalled for.  I'm not vandalizing anything. -- +++$+++ I am getting quite frustrated with this person.  He/she refuses to engage in a conversation with me on his talk page about this.  He insists on trying to engage others in conversations about me, yet hypocritically reverts my comments on his page.  [[User:TBTA|TBTA]] was not driven off by me.  That user made ridiculous edits on [[Baseball card]] and refused to make accurate edits. I ended up having to do it for him.  I never once attacked you or anything you said until you started this harassment.  At that point I told you to go learn to read.  I believe there is nothing that will come of this, but I would like to be kept abrest of the topics if they are going to involve me.  The pages I have edited are mostly related to Baseball because that's what I am a fan of.  Of cours I'm going to react to being accused of this and deny the claims when they are untrue and totally uncalled for.  I'm not vandalizing anything. --[[User:Tecmobowl|Tecmobowl]] 01:54, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
481971 +++$+++ CFIF +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481970 +++$+++ 481970 +++$+++ 2006-10-01 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.159693680E09 +++$+++ {{vandal|A Coin Off Rims}} has been reverting my recent edits, calling them minor. Also, look at my talk page history and there is an IP there that claims they are Displaced Brit. -- +++$+++ :{{vandal|A Coin Off Rims}} has been reverting my recent edits, calling them minor. Also, look at my talk page history and there is an IP there that claims they are Displaced Brit. --[[User:CFIF|CFIF]] [[User talk:CFIF|☎]] [[Special:Contributions/CFIF|⋐]] 02:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
481972 +++$+++ TV Newser +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481970 +++$+++ 481970 +++$+++ 2006-10-01 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.159741080E09 +++$+++ The user name seems to be an anagram for \"CFIF is a moron\" which makes it a blatant attack.  +++$+++ *The user name seems to be an anagram for "CFIF is a moron" which makes it a blatant attack. [[User:TV Newser|TV Newser]] [[User talk:TV Newser|Tipline]] 15:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

8239 +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8239 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-24 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.206390300E09 +++$+++ Please stop blanking articles.  Blanking of articles is (almost) never the proper way to handle bad content on the project.  And already tagged copyvios do not fit the \"almost\".  All of your blankings are now showing up on reports of blank pages, mixed in with vandalism blankings.  I'm going to revert the blankings to their copyvio tagged state so that they can be properly handled, and not bloat up the reports.  -  +++$+++ Please stop blanking articles.  Blanking of articles is (almost) never the proper way to handle bad content on the project.  And already tagged copyvios do not fit the "almost".  All of your blankings are now showing up on reports of blank pages, mixed in with vandalism blankings.  I'm going to revert the blankings to their copyvio tagged state so that they can be properly handled, and not bloat up the reports.  - [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] ([[User talk:TexasAndroid|talk]]) 13:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
8240 +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8239 +++$+++ 8239 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.206391920E09 +++$+++ Let me stress that I too have full assumptions that this all happened in a good faith effort to do right by the project.  I used admin roll-back on some of them because of the sheer number that needed to be reverted.  Admin rollback is normally supposed to be used for reverting vandalism.  I want to stress that my use in this case was not in any way intended to show or imply that I thought that these edits were vandalism.  As for what next, I'll let you deal with Moonriddengirl on that.  She sounds to be much more an expert on handling copyvios than I am.  For myself, I'm a short pages patroller, and it was on the short pages reports that I found all these blankings. -  +++$+++ : Let me stress that I too have full assumptions that this all happened in a good faith effort to do right by the project.  I used admin roll-back on some of them because of the sheer number that needed to be reverted.  Admin rollback is normally supposed to be used for reverting vandalism.  I want to stress that my use in this case was not in any way intended to show or imply that I thought that these edits were vandalism.  As for what next, I'll let you deal with Moonriddengirl on that.  She sounds to be much more an expert on handling copyvios than I am.  For myself, I'm a short pages patroller, and it was on the short pages reports that I found all these blankings. - [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] ([[User talk:TexasAndroid|talk]]) 13:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

270384 +++$+++ Thegreatdr +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270384 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-30 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.246415160E09 +++$+++ I made comments on the GAN page three days ago, which haven't been responded to.  I need clarification concerning one of your points, and if I have satisfied your other concerns.  +++$+++ I made comments on the GAN page three days ago, which haven't been responded to.  I need clarification concerning one of your points, and if I have satisfied your other concerns. [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] ([[User talk:Thegreatdr|talk]]) 19:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
270385 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270384 +++$+++ 270384 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.246601280E09 +++$+++ Sorry! I have taken care of this.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Sorry! I have taken care of this.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
270386 +++$+++ Tiptoety +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270384 +++$+++ 270384 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.246446660E09 +++$+++ ''On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,''  +++$+++ :''On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,'' [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 04:11, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270387 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270384 +++$+++ 270386 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.246456800E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I hope that the above confusing summary of the arbitration case does not cause you concern. I think the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse#Final decision|final decision]] is fairly clear, and you should read that in order to understand the outcome, not the above. (I've commented on the potential confusion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration&diff=prev&oldid=299647671 here].)In any case the arbitration case is over with a fairly sensible outcome in my view. I hope you will never need to return to arbitration again, and that your plan will enable you to enjoy the pleasure of contributing to Wikipedia, while easing the stress that this sometimes involves. '' +++$+++ :: Mattisse, I hope that the above confusing summary of the arbitration case does not cause you concern. I think the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse#Final decision|final decision]] is fairly clear, and you should read that in order to understand the outcome, not the above. (I've commented on the potential confusion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration&diff=prev&oldid=299647671 here].)In any case the arbitration case is over with a fairly sensible outcome in my view. I hope you will never need to return to arbitration again, and that your plan will enable you to enjoy the pleasure of contributing to Wikipedia, while easing the stress that this sometimes involves. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 07:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270388 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270384 +++$+++ 270387 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.246490460E09 +++$+++ I am not clear whether there is more that I should do. Is there? Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::I am not clear whether there is more that I should do. Is there? Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270389 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270384 +++$+++ 270388 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.246492380E09 +++$+++ Nope, it's over Mattisse, nothing else you need to do. Just go about your normal business now. :-) -- +++$+++ ::::Nope, it's over Mattisse, nothing else you need to do. Just go about your normal business now. :-) --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 16:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270390 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270384 +++$+++ 270389 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.246492560E09 +++$+++ That's good. Thanks!  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::That's good. Thanks!  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270391 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270384 +++$+++ 270386 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.246474740E09 +++$+++ Hear, hear. I think that's just about as good an outcome as could reasonably be expected. Now let's all get back to work. :-) -- +++$+++ ::Hear, hear. I think that's just about as good an outcome as could reasonably be expected. Now let's all get back to work. :-) --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 11:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

532532 +++$+++ Eleassar +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532532 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-17 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.147915560E09 +++$+++ I have reverted your edits to the Freising manuscripts, per [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Slovenian vs Slovene]]. I hope for your understanding. -- +++$+++ I have reverted your edits to the Freising manuscripts, per [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Slovenian vs Slovene]]. I hope for your understanding. --[[User:Eleassar|'''Eleassar''']] <sup>[[User talk:Eleassar|my talk]]</sup> 18:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
532533 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532532 +++$+++ 532532 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.147917360E09 +++$+++ Ok, leave it that way although the guideline prefers ''Slovenian''. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : Ok, leave it that way although the guideline prefers ''Slovenian''. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 18:56, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

270393 +++$+++ Cyclonebiskit +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-05 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.246777680E09 +++$+++ There are very few sources available for it so what's in the article is all I could really work with. I've responded to your comments on the review page.  +++$+++ There are very few sources available for it so what's in the article is all I could really work with. I've responded to your comments on the review page. [[User:Cyclonebiskit|Cyclonebiskit]] ([[User talk:Cyclonebiskit|talk]]) 00:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
270394 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270393 +++$+++ 270393 +++$+++ 2009-07-05 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.246777740E09 +++$+++ OK. That was quick! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :OK. That was quick! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

8251 +++$+++ Itsmejudith +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8251 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-27 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.209310980E09 +++$+++ I rescued it. What I did was to type in Mom jeans and press go, which took me to Saturday Night Live but at the top was a little note saying I had been redirected from Mom jeans, which was linked. I was then able to access the page history and took the page back to a previous version. However, the redirect was a good faith edit. If there is not much more to say about this term then maybe it should be merged with SNL. The correct way to do this would be to tag it for merge and invite discussion. Best wishes.  +++$+++ I rescued it. What I did was to type in Mom jeans and press go, which took me to Saturday Night Live but at the top was a little note saying I had been redirected from Mom jeans, which was linked. I was then able to access the page history and took the page back to a previous version. However, the redirect was a good faith edit. If there is not much more to say about this term then maybe it should be merged with SNL. The correct way to do this would be to tag it for merge and invite discussion. Best wishes. [[User:Itsmejudith|Itsmejudith]] ([[User talk:Itsmejudith|talk]]) 08:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
8252 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8251 +++$+++ 8251 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 06:38:00 +++$+++ 1.209562680E09 +++$+++ To be honest, I wish you hadn't, though I realise your intentions were good. As it says at the top of the page, <nowiki> \"If you take any of the other stubs to either WSS\/D or SFD, score through it on the list using <s> and <\/s>\"\"<\/nowiki> - a lot of those you scored through haven't been near either the discovery page or SFD, so shouldn't have been scored through ({{tl|cook-tool-stub}} is one that immediately springs to mind that hasn't been to either) - I still need to go through them and see whether any of them are possible sfd candidates (again, cook-tool-stub is one possibility). I'm going to un-score the lot for now and check through them when I get the chance to see which ones still need to be looked at.  +++$+++ :To be honest, I wish you hadn't, though I realise your intentions were good. As it says at the top of the page, <nowiki> "If you take any of the other stubs to either WSS/D or SFD, score through it on the list using <s> and </s>""</nowiki> - a lot of those you scored through haven't been near either the discovery page or SFD, so shouldn't have been scored through ({{tl|cook-tool-stub}} is one that immediately springs to mind that hasn't been to either) - I still need to go through them and see whether any of them are possible sfd candidates (again, cook-tool-stub is one possibility). I'm going to un-score the lot for now and check through them when I get the chance to see which ones still need to be looked at. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 06:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

45066 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ 45066 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.307917380E09 +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes-->  +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 15:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
45067 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ 45066 +++$+++ 45066 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.307917620E09 +++$+++ The robot is wrong.   The text is my own.   It paraphrases the text of the German wikipedia entry on the same car and (more loosely) elements of the Italian wikipedia entry on the car.   +++$+++ :The robot is wrong.   The text is my own.   It paraphrases the text of the German wikipedia entry on the same car and (more loosely) elements of the Italian wikipedia entry on the car.  [[User:Charles01|Charles01]] ([[User talk:Charles01#top|talk]]) 15:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

539506 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539506 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-08 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.234132140E09 +++$+++ In all honesty I'm disappointed by the way you have responded to the Bulgarian municipal templates. I noticed you didn't respond when I first mentioned it, I gather you don't think it is a good idea. If I could access the guide Bulgaria site more easily I'd start working on it myself but my computer comes to a halt when I try to access it.  +++$+++ In all honesty I'm disappointed by the way you have responded to the Bulgarian municipal templates. I noticed you didn't respond when I first mentioned it, I gather you don't think it is a good idea. If I could access the guide Bulgaria site more easily I'd start working on it myself but my computer comes to a halt when I try to access it. [[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 14:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
539507 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539506 +++$+++ 539506 +++$+++ 2009-02-08 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.234138920E09 +++$+++ All the best and good luck with those templates. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : All the best and good luck with those templates. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 16:22, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

532545 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532545 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-27 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.148717580E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! Indeed.  +++$+++ Congratulations! Indeed. [[User_talk:Dlohcierekim| :) Dlohcierekim]] 01:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
532546 +++$+++ J.smith +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532545 +++$+++ 532545 +++$+++ 2006-05-27 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.148718720E09 +++$+++ Congrats tone! --- +++$+++ :Congrats tone! ---[[User:J.smith|J.S]] ([[User_talk:J.smith|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/J.smith|c]]) 01:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

270402 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-06 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.246869300E09 +++$+++ Why the theory of evolution?  And what transportation?  Agree with the rest of it.-- +++$+++ Why the theory of evolution?  And what transportation?  Agree with the rest of it.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
270403 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270402 +++$+++ 270402 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.246869840E09 +++$+++ Darwin was in the group. I have been copy editing Darwin articles lately, like ''[[Origin of the Species]]''. It is impossible to underestimate the importance of this. I copyied the rest of the phrase from the [[Industrial Revolution]] article. But also look at the [[Industrialization]] article. It is ridiculous to assert that Boulton was a major driver of this. Best to remove the implication. &mdash; +++$+++ :Darwin was in the group. I have been copy editing Darwin articles lately, like ''[[Origin of the Species]]''. It is impossible to underestimate the importance of this. I copyied the rest of the phrase from the [[Industrial Revolution]] article. But also look at the [[Industrialization]] article. It is ridiculous to assert that Boulton was a major driver of this. Best to remove the implication. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
270404 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270402 +++$+++ 270403 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.246870260E09 +++$+++ Erasmus Darwin, actually, but I guess he presaged his grandson's work enough from what I can see.  Plainly there are different views of what drove the industrial revolution.  If you read what I wrote, I refer to the engine driving it, not Boulton.  I think it is right.  Causation chains are difficult to deal with.-- +++$+++ ::Erasmus Darwin, actually, but I guess he presaged his grandson's work enough from what I can see.  Plainly there are different views of what drove the industrial revolution.  If you read what I wrote, I refer to the engine driving it, not Boulton.  I think it is right.  Causation chains are difficult to deal with.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
270405 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270402 +++$+++ 270404 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.246871520E09 +++$+++ Yes, he did presage his grandson.  The Watt engine contributed to the Industrial Revolutions, but so did an enormous number of other things. To say one engine, one version of the steam engine, \"drove\" the revolution is a massive statement. However, if you want to root around in industrialization articles, to provide your point, be my guest as they say. I feel this is a red herring in the article, but if you feel it is worth holding up the article  to  \"prove\" this point, that is your choice. I feel that Boulton does not need this extraneous baggage to be an interesting, notable, historically interesting person. A creative businessman, yes. Did he personally design the coins, develop the processes etc. or did those that he hired?  I say ditch the hype about driving industrialization, unless you want to immerse yourself in the history of industrialization in Britain. Personally, I do not think you will find anything. \"My view\" - disclaimer! &mdash; +++$+++ :::Yes, he did presage his grandson.  The Watt engine contributed to the Industrial Revolutions, but so did an enormous number of other things. To say one engine, one version of the steam engine, "drove" the revolution is a massive statement. However, if you want to root around in industrialization articles, to provide your point, be my guest as they say. I feel this is a red herring in the article, but if you feel it is worth holding up the article  to  "prove" this point, that is your choice. I feel that Boulton does not need this extraneous baggage to be an interesting, notable, historically interesting person. A creative businessman, yes. Did he personally design the coins, develop the processes etc. or did those that he hired?  I say ditch the hype about driving industrialization, unless you want to immerse yourself in the history of industrialization in Britain. Personally, I do not think you will find anything. "My view" - disclaimer! &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
270406 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270402 +++$+++ 270405 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.246871820E09 +++$+++ I may make it clearer that it is opinion.  You are correct, how do you say in a myriad of factors which \"drove\" and which didn't?  And no, Boulton didn't design the coins.  As near as I can tell, he waved the wand.  He may have done designing of the machines, but he made almost nothing with his own hands.-- +++$+++ ::::I may make it clearer that it is opinion.  You are correct, how do you say in a myriad of factors which "drove" and which didn't?  And no, Boulton didn't design the coins.  As near as I can tell, he waved the wand.  He may have done designing of the machines, but he made almost nothing with his own hands.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 02:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
270407 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270402 +++$+++ 270406 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.246872360E09 +++$+++ I am not clear how much he actually \"designed\". He saw the potential in the design and he encouraged Watt to do it. But mainly, it appears to me, he was a business man who fascilitated others to do the designing necessary for his business. Therefore, how much should the article get into proving he \"drove\" anything. Even the pictures of the designs suggested are not \"his\", and therefore unnecessary to the article, in my opinion. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I am not clear how much he actually "designed". He saw the potential in the design and he encouraged Watt to do it. But mainly, it appears to me, he was a business man who fascilitated others to do the designing necessary for his business. Therefore, how much should the article get into proving he "drove" anything. Even the pictures of the designs suggested are not "his", and therefore unnecessary to the article, in my opinion. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
270408 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270402 +++$+++ 270407 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.246872660E09 +++$+++ He designed things like the mint machinery; Watt designed the engines and I think Boulton helped make them practical by designing the processes by which they could be made.  Anyway, I think you are right about the Industrial Revolution.  I can't definitively say that the machines triggered, or drove, or whatever, the Industrial Revolution, and so the article shouldn't say it.  I've left a comment on the FAC page.  You keep me honest.-- +++$+++ ::::::He designed things like the mint machinery; Watt designed the engines and I think Boulton helped make them practical by designing the processes by which they could be made.  Anyway, I think you are right about the Industrial Revolution.  I can't definitively say that the machines triggered, or drove, or whatever, the Industrial Revolution, and so the article shouldn't say it.  I've left a comment on the FAC page.  You keep me honest.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 02:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
270409 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270402 +++$+++ 270408 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.246873320E09 +++$+++ It's only for your own good!  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::It's only for your own good!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:42, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
270410 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270402 +++$+++ 270409 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.246873560E09 +++$+++ That's what they told the tomcat before his operation!  Anyway, I think nothing more is going to happen tonight, so I'm getting some sleep.-- +++$+++ ::::::::That's what they told the tomcat before his operation!  Anyway, I think nothing more is going to happen tonight, so I'm getting some sleep.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 02:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

176139 +++$+++ 75.211.163.115 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ 176139 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-25 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.296009780E09 +++$+++ Thank you.<!-- Template:Fdw-multi --> [[Special:Contributions\/75.211.163.115|75.211.163.115]] ( +++$+++ Thank you.<!-- Template:Fdw-multi --> [[Special:Contributions/75.211.163.115|75.211.163.115]] ([[User talk:75.211.163.115|talk]]) 18:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
176140 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ 176139 +++$+++ 176139 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.296028320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the notification, but not really interested in preserving them.   +++$+++ :Thanks for the notification, but not really interested in preserving them.  [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] ([[User talk:Carptrash#top|talk]]) 23:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

8260 +++$+++ TRAVELLINGCARI +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-07 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.210194300E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for helping with this stubbing. I think it's a needed and useful stub, so hope it will survive its discussion. <sub> +++$+++ Thanks so much for helping with this stubbing. I think it's a needed and useful stub, so hope it will survive its discussion. <sub>[[User_talk:Travellingcari|TravellingCari]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Travellingcari|the Busy Bee]]</sup> 14:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
8261 +++$+++ TRAVELLINGCARI +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8260 +++$+++ 8260 +++$+++ 2008-05-09 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.210366140E09 +++$+++ and thanks for letting me know it passed! <sub> +++$+++ : and thanks for letting me know it passed! <sub>[[User_talk:Travellingcari|TravellingCari]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Travellingcari|the Busy Bee]]</sup> 13:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

532550 +++$+++ Jusjih +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-27 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.148763900E09 +++$+++ Best wish for your adminship. As you have asked if there's any anything you can help in the future, I would like to request periodically deleting images with copyright problems. I am tagging some now.-- +++$+++ Best wish for your adminship. As you have asked if there's any anything you can help in the future, I would like to request periodically deleting images with copyright problems. I am tagging some now.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] 14:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
532551 +++$+++ Rama's Arrow +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532550 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-27 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.148784360E09 +++$+++ Mighty congratulations! You are a wise person.  +++$+++ ::Mighty congratulations! You are a wise person. [[User:Rama's Arrow|Rama&#39;s Arrow]] 19:46, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

270411 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-27 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.246138260E09 +++$+++ You know, you keep telling me to look for another Speer, and I think I've found one.  I was reading a book about Khrushchev's visit to the US in 1959, and he seems to have been a very conflicted character.  He ended his career, in retirement by writing his memoirs against the demands of the KGB and having them smuggled to the West to be published.  As it happens, I am going to Moscow in August, though I doubt it will be much help to the article.  But he could be incredibly charming, and he could be a total jerk.  Might be worth doing, though I'd have to get in a fair number of references.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 14:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)-- +++$+++ You know, you keep telling me to look for another Speer, and I think I've found one.  I was reading a book about Khrushchev's visit to the US in 1959, and he seems to have been a very conflicted character.  He ended his career, in retirement by writing his memoirs against the demands of the KGB and having them smuggled to the West to be published.  As it happens, I am going to Moscow in August, though I doubt it will be much help to the article.  But he could be incredibly charming, and he could be a total jerk.  Might be worth doing, though I'd have to get in a fair number of references.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 14:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 14:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
270412 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270411 +++$+++ 270411 +++$+++ 2009-06-27 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.246139700E09 +++$+++ Perhaps Khrushchev had an interesting relationship with his wife, as I remember her being mentioned in an era when wives, never mind Soviet wives were not showcased. And there must be plenty of material. I did not know about the autobiography. Dasha by the Black Sea? I know little about the complexities of Soviet politics of the time. My brother sent me a book on recently released files on Cuba, including the Cuban missile crisis and the relationship between Castro and Khrushchev then.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Perhaps Khrushchev had an interesting relationship with his wife, as I remember her being mentioned in an era when wives, never mind Soviet wives were not showcased. And there must be plenty of material. I did not know about the autobiography. Dasha by the Black Sea? I know little about the complexities of Soviet politics of the time. My brother sent me a book on recently released files on Cuba, including the Cuban missile crisis and the relationship between Castro and Khrushchev then.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:55, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
270413 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270411 +++$+++ 270412 +++$+++ 2009-06-27 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.246140300E09 +++$+++ Apparently he was allowed to keep two homes, a dasha, and a house in Moscow.  This was unusual, usually when Soviet bigwigs were retired, they either (ahem) died, or else were forced to be an \"ordinary citizen\".  I'm not sure where the dasha was.  At least according to the book on K's visit to the US, which has an afterword, he was very remorseful about his role in Stalin's crimes, and when his grandson was asked what his grandfather did in retirement, he said, \"Grandfather cries\".  And when he came to America, there was an unprecedented media frenzy.  I'm going to start looking for good references.  I don't know that I will start serious work until I finish Boulton and get the Nixon election articles out of the way.  But I have a good feeling about this one.  As for the wife, she was rather outspoken for a Soviet wife, from what I could see from the book I read (most were thick in the body, thick in the head, and spoke about as much as a wooden doll).-- +++$+++ ::Apparently he was allowed to keep two homes, a dasha, and a house in Moscow.  This was unusual, usually when Soviet bigwigs were retired, they either (ahem) died, or else were forced to be an "ordinary citizen".  I'm not sure where the dasha was.  At least according to the book on K's visit to the US, which has an afterword, he was very remorseful about his role in Stalin's crimes, and when his grandson was asked what his grandfather did in retirement, he said, "Grandfather cries".  And when he came to America, there was an unprecedented media frenzy.  I'm going to start looking for good references.  I don't know that I will start serious work until I finish Boulton and get the Nixon election articles out of the way.  But I have a good feeling about this one.  As for the wife, she was rather outspoken for a Soviet wife, from what I could see from the book I read (most were thick in the body, thick in the head, and spoke about as much as a wooden doll).--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 15:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
270414 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270411 +++$+++ 270413 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.246502100E09 +++$+++ I got several books on K at a used bookstore I favor.  I really saw no point in buying any bio before 1991, though, I would consider a bio that lacked access to the Soviet archives hopelessly out of date.-- +++$+++ :::I got several books on K at a used bookstore I favor.  I really saw no point in buying any bio before 1991, though, I would consider a bio that lacked access to the Soviet archives hopelessly out of date.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 19:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270415 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270411 +++$+++ 270414 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.246502700E09 +++$+++ Agree. I think the Taubman book is a must.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Agree. I think the Taubman book is a must.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270416 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270411 +++$+++ 270415 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.246502820E09 +++$+++ Yeah, they had it, but as I had already ordered it by mail, I didn't buy it of course.  But it is likely to be the book most heavily relied on.  Thanks for the support at Boulton.  With a centennial date six weeks away, I nommed it faster than I should have but I think it is all working out.-- +++$+++ :::::Yeah, they had it, but as I had already ordered it by mail, I didn't buy it of course.  But it is likely to be the book most heavily relied on.  Thanks for the support at Boulton.  With a centennial date six weeks away, I nommed it faster than I should have but I think it is all working out.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 19:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
270417 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270411 +++$+++ 270415 +++$+++ 2009-07-04 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.246691580E09 +++$+++ I have all the books now except that key biography.  I've also been giving some thought to [[Liberty Bell]] in the spirit of the holiday, but there is surprisingly little written about it.  As for books, just some kiddie books and something from 1910 which is utterly unusable.-- +++$+++ :::::I have all the books now except that key biography.  I've also been giving some thought to [[Liberty Bell]] in the spirit of the holiday, but there is surprisingly little written about it.  As for books, just some kiddie books and something from 1910 which is utterly unusable.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
270418 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270411 +++$+++ 270417 +++$+++ 2009-07-04 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.246741380E09 +++$+++ All I know about the bell is that there was some discussion about the crack causing it to deteriorate a while ago. It is a icon, but not like the flag. I have the key biography ordered also. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::All I know about the bell is that there was some discussion about the crack causing it to deteriorate a while ago. It is a icon, but not like the flag. I have the key biography ordered also. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
270419 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270411 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.246867920E09 +++$+++ Would make a great DYK, depending on your \"web\" sources. Article name: \"Liberty bell warranty\". &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::Would make a great DYK, depending on your "web" sources. Article name: "Liberty bell warranty". &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

8268 +++$+++ mrg3105 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-06 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.212763140E09 +++$+++ on Kabbalah related articles - why?-- +++$+++ on Kabbalah related articles - why?--[[User:mrg3105|mrg3105]] ([[User talk:mrg3105|comms]]) ♠<font color="#BB0000">♥</font><font color="#BB0000">♦</font>♣ 07:39, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
8269 +++$+++ mrg3105 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8268 +++$+++ 8268 +++$+++ 2008-06-06 08:58:00 +++$+++ 1.212767880E09 +++$+++ Ok, fair enough. I'll give you a hand since I have just undone three-- +++$+++ :Ok, fair enough. I'll give you a hand since I have just undone three--[[User:mrg3105|mrg3105]] ([[User talk:mrg3105|comms]]) ♠<font color="#BB0000">♥</font><font color="#BB0000">♦</font>♣ 08:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

525666 +++$+++ Eleassar +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-19 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.211246400E09 +++$+++ The external links provided by the template do not lead where intended. See e.g. at [[International Classification of Diseases for Oncology]]. -- +++$+++ The external links provided by the template do not lead where intended. See e.g. at [[International Classification of Diseases for Oncology]]. --[[User:Eleassar|'''Eleassar''']] <sup>[[User talk:Eleassar|my talk]]</sup> 18:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
525667 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525666 +++$+++ 525666 +++$+++ 2008-05-19 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.211253600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know -- I've [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3AICDO&diff=213543142&oldid=190948579 updated] the link again. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know -- I've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AICDO&diff=213543142&oldid=190948579 updated] the link again. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 20:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
525668 +++$+++ Eleassar +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525666 +++$+++ 525667 +++$+++ 2008-05-20 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.211323140E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but some of the links still don't work. I've tried with '(M8590\/1) Sex cord-stromal tumor' at [[International Classification of Diseases for Oncology]]. -- +++$+++ ::Sorry, but some of the links still don't work. I've tried with '(M8590/1) Sex cord-stromal tumor' at [[International Classification of Diseases for Oncology]]. --[[User:Eleassar|'''Eleassar''']] <sup>[[User talk:Eleassar|my talk]]</sup> 15:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
525669 +++$+++ Eleassar +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525666 +++$+++ 525667 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.211393280E09 +++$+++ Could you please comment this before I try to tweak the template myself? Thanks. -- +++$+++ ::Could you please comment this before I try to tweak the template myself? Thanks. --[[User:Eleassar|'''Eleassar''']] <sup>[[User talk:Eleassar|my talk]]</sup> 11:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
525670 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525666 +++$+++ 525669 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.211411820E09 +++$+++ I believe the issue is that the source (progenetix) doesn't support every ICDO code. If you can find a different way of linking to the source that provides more success, or if you can a different source that supports more codes, feel free to implement those changes. (If you have further comments, it would be more productive to leave them at [[Template talk:ICDO]], to make it easier for others in the future to follow the discussion.) -- +++$+++ :::I believe the issue is that the source (progenetix) doesn't support every ICDO code. If you can find a different way of linking to the source that provides more success, or if you can a different source that supports more codes, feel free to implement those changes. (If you have further comments, it would be more productive to leave them at [[Template talk:ICDO]], to make it easier for others in the future to follow the discussion.) --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 16:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

532560 +++$+++ Mangojuice +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-30 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.149047700E09 +++$+++ I've noticed that you have proposed a bunch of articles for deletion recently with \"notability\" or \"notability concerns\" as your only reason.  Could you be a little more illuminating in your prod reasons?  It's sometimes hard to tell what you find non-notable about each of these articles.. and also, note that [[WP:N]] isn't an official guideline (in fact, it's been rejected), but more specific ones are, such as WP:BIO, WP:CORP, and so on.  Thanks!   +++$+++ I've noticed that you have proposed a bunch of articles for deletion recently with "notability" or "notability concerns" as your only reason.  Could you be a little more illuminating in your prod reasons?  It's sometimes hard to tell what you find non-notable about each of these articles.. and also, note that [[WP:N]] isn't an official guideline (in fact, it's been rejected), but more specific ones are, such as WP:BIO, WP:CORP, and so on.  Thanks!  [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 20:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
532561 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532560 +++$+++ 532560 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.149131820E09 +++$+++ The reply is on user's talkpage. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : The reply is on user's talkpage. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 20:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

481976 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-02 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.159838520E09 +++$+++ I noticed the sporadic editing by the user, and that was why I made the initial block of one week. I have changed it to one day now, because I don't want this block to affect other potentially good users from editing on Wikipedia. My reasoning for the initial block was because the edits were so spaced out, and the person had vandalized every few days, and I thought if I blocked them for a week, I could possibly discourage them from contributing negatively to Wikipedia. -- +++$+++ I noticed the sporadic editing by the user, and that was why I made the initial block of one week. I have changed it to one day now, because I don't want this block to affect other potentially good users from editing on Wikipedia. My reasoning for the initial block was because the edits were so spaced out, and the person had vandalized every few days, and I thought if I blocked them for a week, I could possibly discourage them from contributing negatively to Wikipedia. --[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="color:red">'''Nish'''</span><span style="color:blue">'''kid'''</span><span style="color:green">'''64'''</span>]] 18:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
481977 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481976 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-02 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.159838820E09 +++$+++ Okay, I have a question here. See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/block&page=User:24.75.176.130 here].  I was about to block that user for maybe a day or two, but not for a whole month like DVD did. Would this be a case in which a long-term block is appropriate because the user has only made bad edits? I would think that is the reason for his decision (and also because the last block was a month long), but I just want to make sure. Thanks for answering my question. -- +++$+++ ::Okay, I have a question here. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User:24.75.176.130 here].  I was about to block that user for maybe a day or two, but not for a whole month like DVD did. Would this be a case in which a long-term block is appropriate because the user has only made bad edits? I would think that is the reason for his decision (and also because the last block was a month long), but I just want to make sure. Thanks for answering my question. --[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="color:red">'''Nish'''</span><span style="color:blue">'''kid'''</span><span style="color:green">'''64'''</span>]] 18:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

532563 +++$+++ Thorpe +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532563 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-31 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.149143940E09 +++$+++ Why did you delete [[Hamish Tildesley]] article? This isn't a personal biography. --<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"><b> +++$+++ Why did you delete [[Hamish Tildesley]] article? This isn't a personal biography. --<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><b>[[User:Thorpe|Thorpe]]</b> | [[User talk:Thorpe|talk]]</span> 23:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
532564 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532563 +++$+++ 532563 +++$+++ 2006-06-01 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.149173760E09 +++$+++ It was tagged as a speedy delete. I will restore it and put it to a AfD discussion. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : It was tagged as a speedy delete. I will restore it and put it to a AfD discussion. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 07:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

270420 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-05 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.246787640E09 +++$+++ The funny thing is that I didn't even know that [[Hispanic Americans in World War II]] was in the main page until I checked my \"watchlist\" and began to wonder why are so many people editing it. Remember the tough time I had with the \"FAC\"? I was stressed out. I also want to thank you for helping me gain my 50th DYK.  +++$+++ The funny thing is that I didn't even know that [[Hispanic Americans in World War II]] was in the main page until I checked my "watchlist" and began to wonder why are so many people editing it. Remember the tough time I had with the "FAC"? I was stressed out. I also want to thank you for helping me gain my 50th DYK. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 02:54, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
270421 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270420 +++$+++ 270420 +++$+++ 2009-07-05 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.246845600E09 +++$+++ Yes, I do remember all the problems we had, so I was particularly gratified to see it on the main page, and on July 4.  A triumph! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ : Yes, I do remember all the problems we had, so I was particularly gratified to see it on the main page, and on July 4.  A triumph! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:00, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

8278 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-27 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.214587380E09 +++$+++ ...although I use a different version of both. I tend to not be an \"early adopter\" of technology for precisely this sort of reason.  +++$+++ ...although I use a different version of both. I tend to not be an "early adopter" of technology for precisely this sort of reason. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 10:23, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
8279 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8278 +++$+++ 8278 +++$+++ 2008-06-27 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.214604660E09 +++$+++ Me too. Just got a brand new computer, and I insisted that Windows XP be installed and ''not'' Vista. -  +++$+++ :Me too. Just got a brand new computer, and I insisted that Windows XP be installed and ''not'' Vista. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 15:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
8280 +++$+++ mrg3105 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8278 +++$+++ 8279 +++$+++ 2008-06-27 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.214629740E09 +++$+++ So funny, I was one of the earliest people to receive MS DOS V1 in the 80s, and since then have waited at least a year before upgrading to next version of MS offering. With Windows I wisely waited almost 2 years, and with Vista I will likely wait more given its complexity. Hmmm, by the time I retire I will be waiting a full decade to upgrade a Microsoft product :)-- +++$+++ ::So funny, I was one of the earliest people to receive MS DOS V1 in the 80s, and since then have waited at least a year before upgrading to next version of MS offering. With Windows I wisely waited almost 2 years, and with Vista I will likely wait more given its complexity. Hmmm, by the time I retire I will be waiting a full decade to upgrade a Microsoft product :)--[[User:mrg3105|mrg3105]] ([[User talk:mrg3105|comms]]) ♠<font color="#BB0000">♥</font><font color="#BB0000">♦</font>♣ 22:09, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

394596 +++$+++ Boleyn2 +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-19 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.224473460E09 +++$+++ This article has been nomiated for deletion. Please see [[WP:PROD]]. Thanks,  +++$+++ This article has been nomiated for deletion. Please see [[WP:PROD]]. Thanks, [[User:Boleyn2|Boleyn2]] ([[User talk:Boleyn2|talk]]) 20:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
394597 +++$+++ Anthony5429 +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394596 +++$+++ 394596 +++$+++ 2008-10-24 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.224832800E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks for the notification. -- +++$+++ :Okay, thanks for the notification. --[[User:Anthony5429|Anthony5429]] ([[User talk:Anthony5429#top|talk]]) 00:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

8283 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-26 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.217066100E09 +++$+++ Are there any Wikisource members in this project, if so would you like to help with the above project. I'm trying to revive this project, but the other two members haven't been near it since 2006. At the moment it consists of copying pages of [[Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)]] If anyone's interested please reply on my talk page.  +++$+++ Are there any Wikisource members in this project, if so would you like to help with the above project. I'm trying to revive this project, but the other two members haven't been near it since 2006. At the moment it consists of copying pages of [[Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)]] If anyone's interested please reply on my talk page. [[User:Kathleen.wright5|Kathleen.wright5]] 02:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
8284 +++$+++ Carlaude +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8283 +++$+++ 8283 +++$+++ 2008-07-28 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.217303280E09 +++$+++ I may be interested. I do not understand where the pages of [[Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)]] are. A lot of the links are red.-- +++$+++ :I may be interested. I do not understand where the pages of [[Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)]] are. A lot of the links are red.--[[User:Carlaude|Carlaude]] ([[User talk:Carlaude|talk]]) 20:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

270428 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-05 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.246808940E09 +++$+++ How are you? Its me Samir. I am in great need of rewriting a journal article to improve its English, can you help me? Its 35 A4 pages long. Let me know by sending an e-mail to mohammadsamirhossain@yahoo.com please. - Samir +++$+++ How are you? Its me Samir. I am in great need of rewriting a journal article to improve its English, can you help me? Its 35 A4 pages long. Let me know by sending an e-mail to mohammadsamirhossain@yahoo.com please. - Samir[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 08:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
270429 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270428 +++$+++ 270428 +++$+++ 2009-07-05 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.246845660E09 +++$+++ Replied by email. &mdash; +++$+++ :Replied by email. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
270430 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270428 +++$+++ 270429 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.246872300E09 +++$+++ Please check the mail again and reply. +++$+++ :: Please check the mail again and reply.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 02:25, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
270431 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270428 +++$+++ 270430 +++$+++ 2009-07-07 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.246956960E09 +++$+++ I have sent the article by e-mail. Pls start as soon as you can, please! +++$+++ ::: I have sent the article by e-mail. Pls start as soon as you can, please![[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 01:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

8286 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8286 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ If you know the whereabouts of the other two users, could you ask them if they're still interested in this project, if not I will remove their names from the members list.  +++$+++ If you know the whereabouts of the other two users, could you ask them if they're still interested in this project, if not I will remove their names from the members list. [[User:Kathleen.wright5|Kathleen.wright5]] 24:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
8287 +++$+++ Carlaude +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8286 +++$+++ 8286 +++$+++ 2008-08-01 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.217583840E09 +++$+++ --<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ :--<span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Carlaude|Carlaude]] <sup>([[User talk:Carlaude|talk]])</sup></span> 02:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

270432 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270432 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-07 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.246952640E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Morse_v._Frederick\/GA1]-- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Morse_v._Frederick/GA1]--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
270433 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270432 +++$+++ 270432 +++$+++ 2009-07-07 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.246953540E09 +++$+++ Without going through all your comments one by one,  I asked you to review the article because you are an expert in law and I respect your opinion. I have written a variety of Supreme Court cases articles having to do with mental health law, my area of expertise, but I was always aware that I was not a legal expert. I learned a great deal from reading one of your previous reviews of a case. I appreciated your expertise.  I am an advocate of Wikipedia articles on subjects relating to  my profession reflecting a profession level of writing and knowledge. I don't think you need worry about having the same expectations regarding legal subjects. You are performing the function of educating on legal matters. I think people in general misunderstand court decisions and your expertise is of benefit. &mdash; +++$+++ :Without going through all your comments one by one,  I asked you to review the article because you are an expert in law and I respect your opinion. I have written a variety of Supreme Court cases articles having to do with mental health law, my area of expertise, but I was always aware that I was not a legal expert. I learned a great deal from reading one of your previous reviews of a case. I appreciated your expertise.  I am an advocate of Wikipedia articles on subjects relating to  my profession reflecting a profession level of writing and knowledge. I don't think you need worry about having the same expectations regarding legal subjects. You are performing the function of educating on legal matters. I think people in general misunderstand court decisions and your expertise is of benefit. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
270434 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270432 +++$+++ 270433 +++$+++ 2009-07-07 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.246953840E09 +++$+++ Well, thanks.  I have gotten him to change his mind and resume work, and I'll take pains to be gentle but strict.-- +++$+++ ::Well, thanks.  I have gotten him to change his mind and resume work, and I'll take pains to be gentle but strict.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

569360 +++$+++ TeckWiz +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-13 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.166079240E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; 1px solid gray;\" | Hello (aeropagitica)! I want to thank you for taking time to comment in my [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/TeckWiz|recent request for adminship.]] Though it didn't succeed, I value everyone's opinion, and hope to use the descriptions of the neutral and oppose votes to improve. [[User:TeckWiz|'''T''']][[User:TeckWiz\/Esperanza|<span style=\"color:green;\">e<\/span>]] +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; 1px solid gray;" | Hello (aeropagitica)! I want to thank you for taking time to comment in my [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TeckWiz|recent request for adminship.]] Though it didn't succeed, I value everyone's opinion, and hope to use the descriptions of the neutral and oppose votes to improve. [[User:TeckWiz|'''T''']][[User:TeckWiz/Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">e</span>]][[User:TeckWiz|'''ckWiz''']]<sup>[[User_talk:TeckWiz|Talk]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/TeckWiz|Contribs]]<sub>[[Special:Emailuser/TeckWiz|@]]</sub></small> 22:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
569361 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569360 +++$+++ 569360 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.166080440E09 +++$+++ Don't look at this as a defeat because it isn't.  Everyone who commented on your RfA wants to see you improve as an editor; we all believe that you can and it's good that you do too!  Take the advice on board and keep up the good edits.  I'll expect to see you back on RfA some time in the New Year.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Don't look at this as a defeat because it isn't.  Everyone who commented on your RfA wants to see you improve as an editor; we all believe that you can and it's good that you do too!  Take the advice on board and keep up the good edits.  I'll expect to see you back on RfA some time in the New Year.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

270435 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270435 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-07 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.247004420E09 +++$+++ I have added the article myself in my talk page at the last part. Please try to edit it for language. +++$+++ I have added the article myself in my talk page at the last part. Please try to edit it for language.[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 15:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
270436 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270435 +++$+++ 270435 +++$+++ 2009-07-07 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.247005620E09 +++$+++ I am so sorry to say that I cannot do it. The subject is not one with which I am familiar nor am an expert. It would take me weeks to do and I would not be confident in the results. I apologize to you. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I am so sorry to say that I cannot do it. The subject is not one with which I am familiar nor am an expert. It would take me weeks to do and I would not be confident in the results. I apologize to you. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:27, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
270437 +++$+++ Shoovrow +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270435 +++$+++ 270436 +++$+++ 2009-07-08 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.247082540E09 +++$+++ Thank you +++$+++ :: Thank you[[User:Shoovrow|Shoovrow]] ([[User talk:Shoovrow|talk]]) 12:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

8295 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-12 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.231831200E09 +++$+++ That's a weird one - but I've found out the cause. The clue was that the message was down by the userboxes. looks like [[Wikipedia:Intensive Care Unit\/UBX]] - one of the userboxes you've got on that section - has been nominated for deletion, and that's where the message is coming from. Your page is safe :)  +++$+++ That's a weird one - but I've found out the cause. The clue was that the message was down by the userboxes. looks like [[Wikipedia:Intensive Care Unit/UBX]] - one of the userboxes you've got on that section - has been nominated for deletion, and that's where the message is coming from. Your page is safe :) [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 23:20, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
8296 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8295 +++$+++ 8295 +++$+++ 2009-01-12 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.231831440E09 +++$+++ The nominator had used the wrong MfD message template when the userbox was nominated. Hopefully it's fixed now.  +++$+++ :The nominator had used the wrong MfD message template when the userbox was nominated. Hopefully it's fixed now. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 23:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

8298 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8298 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.232926500E09 +++$+++ Why are you tagging images that are not screenshots of Windows Vista, with [[:Category:Screenshots of Windows Vista]]?  You're making extra work for me, reviewing every edit you've made and correcting these mistakes.  Please endeavor to be more careful... thanks.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ Why are you tagging images that are not screenshots of Windows Vista, with [[:Category:Screenshots of Windows Vista]]?  You're making extra work for me, reviewing every edit you've made and correcting these mistakes.  Please endeavor to be more careful... thanks.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 15:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
8299 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8298 +++$+++ 8298 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.232926920E09 +++$+++ Furthermore, by adding screenshots of non-free software to categories, you are inadvertently creating galleries in the category articles themselves.  This is explicitly against Wikipedia's image use policy (see [[WP:NFCC]] #9).  To avoid this, you need to add <nowiki>\"__NOGALLERY__\"<\/nowiki> to every category article for which you are adding non-free images.  It would be better still to create new categories specifically for screenshots, so that they can be found by navigating the image categories. Thanks.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Furthermore, by adding screenshots of non-free software to categories, you are inadvertently creating galleries in the category articles themselves.  This is explicitly against Wikipedia's image use policy (see [[WP:NFCC]] #9).  To avoid this, you need to add <nowiki>"__NOGALLERY__"</nowiki> to every category article for which you are adding non-free images.  It would be better still to create new categories specifically for screenshots, so that they can be found by navigating the image categories. Thanks.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 15:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

8301 +++$+++ Vojvodaen +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-08 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.234118880E09 +++$+++ thanks for link. I started voting. Can you chach have i done it on apropriate way?-- +++$+++ thanks for link. I started voting. Can you chach have i done it on apropriate way?--[[user:vojvodaen|Vojvodae]][http://istorijska-biblioteka.wikidot.com/start ist] 10:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
8302 +++$+++ Vojvodaen +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8301 +++$+++ 8301 +++$+++ 2009-02-08 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.234128900E09 +++$+++ Serbian Orthodox Church isn't new religiouss movement. It was constitute in 1219 by [[Saint Sava]]. Since than it has long and interesting (for me) history and of course present.-- +++$+++ :Serbian Orthodox Church isn't new religiouss movement. It was constitute in 1219 by [[Saint Sava]]. Since than it has long and interesting (for me) history and of course present.--[[user:vojvodaen|Vojvodae]][http://istorijska-biblioteka.wikidot.com/start ist] 13:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
8303 +++$+++ Vojvodaen +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8301 +++$+++ 8302 +++$+++ 2009-02-09 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.234191660E09 +++$+++ I saw mistake and I will fix it.-- +++$+++ ::I saw mistake and I will fix it.--[[user:vojvodaen|Vojvodae]][http://istorijska-biblioteka.wikidot.com/start ist] 07:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

270447 +++$+++ Al Ameer son +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270447 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-11 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.247307240E09 +++$+++ Hey Mattisse! I've come to inform you that, unfortunately, I probably won't be able to work on the article as I had planned and the original nominator has still not returned. I don't what the procedure is here, but if nothing is done before the expiration of the hold, don't hesitate to fail the article. -- +++$+++ Hey Mattisse! I've come to inform you that, unfortunately, I probably won't be able to work on the article as I had planned and the original nominator has still not returned. I don't what the procedure is here, but if nothing is done before the expiration of the hold, don't hesitate to fail the article. --[[User:Al Ameer son|Al Ameer son]] ([[User talk:Al Ameer son|talk]]) 03:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270448 +++$+++ Davesalterego +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270447 +++$+++ 270447 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.247337120E09 +++$+++ In an unrelated incident, my home internet access has gone on the blink so won't be able to work on ''Coral Reefs'' until a replacement part arrives. Should he back online within a week, in the meantime thanks for your continuing efforts to improve the article; [[user:dave souza|dave souza]] editing from a public library as  +++$+++ :In an unrelated incident, my home internet access has gone on the blink so won't be able to work on ''Coral Reefs'' until a replacement part arrives. Should he back online within a week, in the meantime thanks for your continuing efforts to improve the article; [[user:dave souza|dave souza]] editing from a public library as [[User:Davesalterego|Davesalterego]] ([[User talk:Davesalterego|talk]]) 11:32, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

532592 +++$+++ TruthbringerToronto +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-06 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.152231480E09 +++$+++ Please undelete [[Joseph E. Ibberson Conservation Area]]. I had reduced the article to a stub in order to eliminate the copyvio material, and I was intending to expand it. In general, if an article is flagged as a stub, it's probably best not to delete it speedily.  +++$+++ Please undelete [[Joseph E. Ibberson Conservation Area]]. I had reduced the article to a stub in order to eliminate the copyvio material, and I was intending to expand it. In general, if an article is flagged as a stub, it's probably best not to delete it speedily. [[User:TruthbringerToronto|TruthbringerToronto]] ([[User_talk:TruthbringerToronto|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TruthbringerToronto|contribs)]] 17:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
532593 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532592 +++$+++ 532592 +++$+++ 2006-07-06 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.152231540E09 +++$+++ Ok, fixed. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : Ok, fixed. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 17:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
532594 +++$+++ TruthbringerToronto +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532592 +++$+++ 532593 +++$+++ 2006-07-06 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.152233280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for fixing it. I have updated the article. If you wish, delete it and then recreate it. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for fixing it. I have updated the article. If you wish, delete it and then recreate it. Thanks. [[User:TruthbringerToronto|TruthbringerToronto]] ([[User_talk:TruthbringerToronto|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TruthbringerToronto|contribs)]] 17:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

270449 +++$+++ Mr Tan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270449 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-12 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.247406660E09 +++$+++ A few minor lapses aside, I think you have done a very good copyedit job for the article which I have since amended. Perhaps you may want to take a look at the article one more time before endorsing itas GA? Thanks!  +++$+++ A few minor lapses aside, I think you have done a very good copyedit job for the article which I have since amended. Perhaps you may want to take a look at the article one more time before endorsing itas GA? Thanks! [[User:Mr Tan|Mr Tan]] ([[User talk:Mr Tan|talk]]) 06:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
270450 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270449 +++$+++ 270449 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.247538660E09 +++$+++ I have revisted it. Nice job? Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I have revisted it. Nice job? Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

270451 +++$+++ I dream of horses +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270451 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-12 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.247447640E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I just read the solution to the arbcom case you just endured. I admire the fact that you proposed that, that you went through all that and you're still here, and that you're willing to change regardless. +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I just read the solution to the arbcom case you just endured. I admire the fact that you proposed that, that you went through all that and you're still here, and that you're willing to change regardless.[[User:I dream of horses|I dream of horses]] ([[User talk:I dream of horses|talk]]) 18:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
270452 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270451 +++$+++ 270451 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.247538840E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your kind thoughts. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you for your kind thoughts. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:34, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

613054 +++$+++ Anthon01 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-29 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.204286340E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you can help. You described a pro-homeopathy pile-on on AN\/I. I submit that Filll is the initiator of the diversion.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Neutral_point_of_view\/Homeopathy%2C_NPOV_and_Minority_Topics&diff=194785243&oldid=194775345] Your help and\/or insight would be appreciated.  +++$+++ Perhaps you can help. You described a pro-homeopathy pile-on on AN/I. I submit that Filll is the initiator of the diversion.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Neutral_point_of_view/Homeopathy%2C_NPOV_and_Minority_Topics&diff=194785243&oldid=194775345] Your help and/or insight would be appreciated. [[User:Anthon01|Anthon01]] ([[User talk:Anthon01|talk]]) 03:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
613055 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613054 +++$+++ 613054 +++$+++ 2008-03-02 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.204502880E09 +++$+++ I didn't say anything about anyone initiating a diversion, and note that the diff you provide postdates my comment. ...  +++$+++ :I didn't say anything about anyone initiating a diversion, and note that the diff you provide postdates my comment. ... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 16:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

270454 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-11 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.247377620E09 +++$+++ I have to agree with Philcha, walk away now, you've said your piece. -- +++$+++ I have to agree with Philcha, walk away now, you've said your piece. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 22:47, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270455 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270454 +++$+++ 270454 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.247378040E09 +++$+++ I realize that there are different standards for different editors, and that Giano is immune from normal standards.. Besides, he is a member of the \"special committee\" appointed by ArbCom. Given that reality, that he can cause an arbitration against me, I will take your advice. Thank you for pointing out the reality of Wikipedia. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I realize that there are different standards for different editors, and that Giano is immune from normal standards.. Besides, he is a member of the "special committee" appointed by ArbCom. Given that reality, that he can cause an arbitration against me, I will take your advice. Thank you for pointing out the reality of Wikipedia. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:54, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270456 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270454 +++$+++ 270455 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.247378280E09 +++$+++ That's not the point Mattisse. The point is that getting down and dirty with Giano will do you no favours, and neither will calling for Kirill's head. Let it be. -- +++$+++ ::That's not the point Mattisse. The point is that getting down and dirty with Giano will do you no favours, and neither will calling for Kirill's head. Let it be. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 22:58, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270457 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270454 +++$+++ 270456 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.247378520E09 +++$+++ I am not calling for Kirill's head. Please stop implying that I am. I asked for an acknowledgement of poor judgment only. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::I am not calling for Kirill's head. Please stop implying that I am. I asked for an acknowledgement of poor judgment only. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:02, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

8311 +++$+++ Miller17CU94 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8311 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-25 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.256515920E09 +++$+++ I saw the edits you did for the Celebrate Freedom 2007 images stating that they were Christian television images. How can they be television if they were taken from a cell phone camera? Would it be for the fact that the images taken were about the television station itself? Please advise.  +++$+++ I saw the edits you did for the Celebrate Freedom 2007 images stating that they were Christian television images. How can they be television if they were taken from a cell phone camera? Would it be for the fact that the images taken were about the television station itself? Please advise. [[User:Miller17CU94|Chris]] ([[User talk:Miller17CU94|talk]]) 17:12, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
8312 +++$+++ Miller17CU94 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8311 +++$+++ 8311 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.256526300E09 +++$+++ WFSH-FM is about a radio station though. Would this be classified as Christian radio station image?  +++$+++ :WFSH-FM is about a radio station though. Would this be classified as Christian radio station image? [[User:Miller17CU94|Chris]] ([[User talk:Miller17CU94|talk]]) 20:05, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

270458 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270458 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-11 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.247378700E09 +++$+++ and the wisdom to know the difference.}} -- +++$+++ and the wisdom to know the difference.}} --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270459 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270458 +++$+++ 270458 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.247378820E09 +++$+++ [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]], Are you willing to remove [[User talk:Giano II|Giano]]'s ad hominem attack on me?[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee\/Noticeboard&diff=301598085&oldid=301597714] Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ *[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]], Are you willing to remove [[User talk:Giano II|Giano]]'s ad hominem attack on me?[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&diff=301598085&oldid=301597714] Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:07, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270460 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270458 +++$+++ 270459 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.247379240E09 +++$+++ : This ad hominem serves only to indicate how sour is Giano's perspective. I've no idea why he is tolerated, but the best approach, in my view, is to ignore him. '' +++$+++ *: This ad hominem serves only to indicate how sour is Giano's perspective. I've no idea why he is tolerated, but the best approach, in my view, is to ignore him. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270461 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270458 +++$+++ 270459 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.247380740E09 +++$+++ :No, I am not, and neither would I remove it or ask anyone else to remove it had it been said about me. We need to learn to be a bit thicker skinned around here, less of the \"personal attack\" nonsense over a bit of name calling. -- +++$+++ *:No, I am not, and neither would I remove it or ask anyone else to remove it had it been said about me. We need to learn to be a bit thicker skinned around here, less of the "personal attack" nonsense over a bit of name calling. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:39, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

8315 +++$+++ Andy Dingley +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-02 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.275497700E09 +++$+++ Please stop (and revert!) This is a terrible idea.  +++$+++ Please stop (and revert!) This is a terrible idea. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 09:55, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
8316 +++$+++ Andy Dingley +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8315 +++$+++ 8315 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.275500160E09 +++$+++ Look at {{tl|LNER Locomotives}} for an even stronger example and the link <code><nowiki>[[GCR Class 9F|N5]]<\/nowiki><\/code> [[GCR Class 9F|N5]].   Without the redlink, how would the new article creator be guided to create under [[GCR Class 9F]] rather than [[LNER Class N5]] ?  +++$+++ : Look at {{tl|LNER Locomotives}} for an even stronger example and the link <code><nowiki>[[GCR Class 9F|N5]]</nowiki></code> [[GCR Class 9F|N5]].   Without the redlink, how would the new article creator be guided to create under [[GCR Class 9F]] rather than [[LNER Class N5]] ? [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 10:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
8317 +++$+++ Andy Dingley +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8315 +++$+++ 8315 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.275500940E09 +++$+++ I've raised some discussion of this at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Stripping redlinks from navigation templates]]. If you can suggest a suitable forum re the redlinks project, that would be useful. Thanks  +++$+++ : I've raised some discussion of this at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Stripping redlinks from navigation templates]]. If you can suggest a suitable forum re the redlinks project, that would be useful. Thanks [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 10:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
8318 +++$+++ BD2412 +++$+++ Kathleen.wright5 +++$+++ 8315 +++$+++ 8317 +++$+++ 2010-06-05 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.275774600E09 +++$+++ Hi, sorry I haven't responded, I've been away. Well, here I am. I'll address the discussion now.  +++$+++ :: Hi, sorry I haven't responded, I've been away. Well, here I am. I'll address the discussion now. [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:gold">'''''bd2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 14:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

263530 +++$+++ Rosameliamartinez +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263530 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-26 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.148660280E09 +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png]] Thanks a lot for reverting the vandalism done to my userpage. :)<font color=\"violet\"> +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png]] Thanks a lot for reverting the vandalism done to my userpage. :)<font color="violet">[[User:Rosameliamartinez|'''Rosa''']]</font> 09:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
263531 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263530 +++$+++ 263530 +++$+++ 2006-05-26 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.148660580E09 +++$+++ My pleasure :)  +++$+++ :My pleasure :) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

270462 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-11 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.247379240E09 +++$+++ (ec) I agree as well. Admitting to mistakes is not easy: such admissions should be received gracefully. Kirill may have made some good faith mistakes, just as you have Mattisse, and indeed we all have. The \"special committee\" is not going to happen, and was never intended to cause arbitration cases anyway. '' +++$+++ (ec) I agree as well. Admitting to mistakes is not easy: such admissions should be received gracefully. Kirill may have made some good faith mistakes, just as you have Mattisse, and indeed we all have. The "special committee" is not going to happen, and was never intended to cause arbitration cases anyway. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270463 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270462 +++$+++ 270462 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.247380140E09 +++$+++ I never asked for Krill to resign. I asked for him to acknowledge a mistake. Giano is not just \"tolerated\", he is asked to be a member of the \"special committee\" by ArbCom. Along with [[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]], whose edit analysis shows that Giano's page is his second highest edit;[http:\/\/en.wikichecker.com\/user\/?l=all&t=Joopercoopers] and who justifies Giano's behavior.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Joopercoopers&diff=301607023&oldid=301606587] What is going on? Actually, I am learning from this. Just tack \"behaving\" on a statement and you can say anything. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I never asked for Krill to resign. I asked for him to acknowledge a mistake. Giano is not just "tolerated", he is asked to be a member of the "special committee" by ArbCom. Along with [[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]], whose edit analysis shows that Giano's page is his second highest edit;[http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?l=all&t=Joopercoopers] and who justifies Giano's behavior.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Joopercoopers&diff=301607023&oldid=301606587] What is going on? Actually, I am learning from this. Just tack "behaving" on a statement and you can say anything. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270464 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270462 +++$+++ 270463 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.247380920E09 +++$+++ Do not try to learn from the bad behaviour of other editors. '' +++$+++ ::Do not try to learn from the bad behaviour of other editors. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270465 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270462 +++$+++ 270464 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.247381400E09 +++$+++ This is a person selected for the \"special committee\" by ArbCom and defended by another member of the \"special committee\". What am I to think? Please do not ask me to be irrational in the face of evidence. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::This is a person selected for the "special committee" by ArbCom and defended by another member of the "special committee". What am I to think? Please do not ask me to be irrational in the face of evidence. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:50, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270466 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270462 +++$+++ 270465 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.247381700E09 +++$+++ All I've seen is people asking you not to trade insults with Giano. Nobody's asking you to be irrational, simply to be dignified. -- +++$+++ ::::All I've seen is people asking you not to trade insults with Giano. Nobody's asking you to be irrational, simply to be dignified. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:55, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

532610 +++$+++ Born Acorn +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-12 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.160704380E09 +++$+++ Im afraid I must protest the deletion of the [[TTDPatch]] article. TTDPatch is quite a notable piece of software, as it has been the only \"modification\" to [[Transport Tycoon]] since 1994. [http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/search?q=TTDPatch&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 Google Results].  +++$+++ Im afraid I must protest the deletion of the [[TTDPatch]] article. TTDPatch is quite a notable piece of software, as it has been the only "modification" to [[Transport Tycoon]] since 1994. [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=TTDPatch&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 Google Results]. [[User:Born Acorn|Born Acorn]] 18:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
532611 +++$+++ Orudge +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 2006-10-12 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.160705100E09 +++$+++ I support Born Acorn on this. TTDPatch is fairly notable within its own field, and the speedy deletion of the article was unwarranted. At the very least, it should have been put up for VfD.  +++$+++ : I support Born Acorn on this. TTDPatch is fairly notable within its own field, and the speedy deletion of the article was unwarranted. At the very least, it should have been put up for VfD. [[User:Orudge|orudge]] 19:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
532612 +++$+++ SpComb +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 2006-10-12 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.160705520E09 +++$+++ There's a large and active community for TTD Patch, and it's certainly a noteable piece of software. Several other wikipedia pages linked to the TTD Patch article (at least the page on TTD itself, as well as OpenTTD). The article was not a blatant advertisement by any definition, and as such, I feel that a mistake has been made. -- +++$+++ :There's a large and active community for TTD Patch, and it's certainly a noteable piece of software. Several other wikipedia pages linked to the TTD Patch article (at least the page on TTD itself, as well as OpenTTD). The article was not a blatant advertisement by any definition, and as such, I feel that a mistake has been made. --[[User:SpComb|SpComb]] 19:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
532613 +++$+++ Darkvater +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Why was this page deleted? Following the same principle all other open-source projects can be deleted under 'advertisement'. This was a very, very bad and too quick a decision without any overhtought. Please put the page back, TTDPatch is an icon to anyone that has played [[Transport Tycoon]] and is NOT an advert.  +++$+++ :Why was this page deleted? Following the same principle all other open-source projects can be deleted under 'advertisement'. This was a very, very bad and too quick a decision without any overhtought. Please put the page back, TTDPatch is an icon to anyone that has played [[Transport Tycoon]] and is NOT an advert. [[User:Darkvater|Darkvater]] 21:07, October 12 2006 (UTC)
532614 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 532613 +++$+++ 2006-10-12 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.160709060E09 +++$+++ Ok guys, I will restore it. Just make sure it doesn't read as an advertisment. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ :: Ok guys, I will restore it. Just make sure it doesn't read as an advertisment. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 20:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
532615 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 2006-10-20 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.161354900E09 +++$+++ Article restored. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : Article restored. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 07:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
532616 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 2006-10-22 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.161569580E09 +++$+++ I guess it was deleted. I can check, if you tell me the title? --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : I guess it was deleted. I can check, if you tell me the title? --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 19:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
532617 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 2006-10-24 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.161708600E09 +++$+++ Fixed. You can rewrite it now. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : Fixed. You can rewrite it now. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 09:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
532618 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 532610 +++$+++ 2006-10-24 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.161745140E09 +++$+++ Indeed, [[The vendettas]]. It was deleted because of [[WP:BAND]] guidelines. Sorry, but I think your band is not yet important enough to have its own article. But I can restore the content at your userpage, it won't bother anyone there. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : Indeed, [[The vendettas]]. It was deleted because of [[WP:BAND]] guidelines. Sorry, but I think your band is not yet important enough to have its own article. But I can restore the content at your userpage, it won't bother anyone there. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 19:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

394603 +++$+++ Moe Epsilon +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394603 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-08 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.239250800E09 +++$+++ Next time you decide to tag an image for something like it being inappropriately uploaded under a format, please make sure it isn't a commons image. The [[Wikimedia Commons]] is hosting this image, not Wikipedia, so its better to be tagged on that project than this one because new versions of the image will uploaded there. \u2014  +++$+++ Next time you decide to tag an image for something like it being inappropriately uploaded under a format, please make sure it isn't a commons image. The [[Wikimedia Commons]] is hosting this image, not Wikipedia, so its better to be tagged on that project than this one because new versions of the image will uploaded there. — [[User:Moe Epsilon|<font color="DD0000">Moe</font>]] --[[User talk:Moe Epsilon|<font color="0000FF">ε</font>]] 21:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
394604 +++$+++ Anthony5429 +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394603 +++$+++ 394603 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.239420840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the tip! -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the tip! --[[User:Anthony5429|Anthony5429]] ([[User talk:Anthony5429#top|talk]]) 20:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

270468 +++$+++ Caspian blue +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-11 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.247381820E09 +++$+++ Mattise, you'd better stop pursuing \"catch Giano's personal attack\" for your own safety. Once you said the comment toward Krill that is perceived as \"distasteful\" by many, the people would automatically recall your ArbCom probation.-- +++$+++ Mattise, you'd better stop pursuing "catch Giano's personal attack" for your own safety. Once you said the comment toward Krill that is perceived as "distasteful" by many, the people would automatically recall your ArbCom probation.--[[User talk:Caspian blue|'''Caspian''' blue]] 23:57, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270469 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270468 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-12 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.247382720E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I really am begging you to step away from this. Whatever the rights and wrongs may be this spat is going to harm nobody but you. -- +++$+++ ::Mattisse, I really am begging you to step away from this. Whatever the rights and wrongs may be this spat is going to harm nobody but you. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 00:12, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
270470 +++$+++ Caspian blue +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270468 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-12 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.247382960E09 +++$+++ Huh? Mattisse, I just advised you for your own safety because I know many people who are agitated there, would lash out at you if you continue to do so. Please have good faith. -- +++$+++ ::Huh? Mattisse, I just advised you for your own safety because I know many people who are agitated there, would lash out at you if you continue to do so. Please have good faith. --[[User talk:Caspian blue|'''Caspian''' blue]] 00:16, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
270471 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270468 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-12 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.247383200E09 +++$+++ I said nothing in bad faith. Yet I was personally attacked. Why am I not safe for complaining about a personal attack? Why is the personal attacker not only allowed to personally attack me, but get \"chosen\" by ArbCom to be on a \"special committee\" to advise ArbCom. Please explain the thinking here, as I really don't understand. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::I said nothing in bad faith. Yet I was personally attacked. Why am I not safe for complaining about a personal attack? Why is the personal attacker not only allowed to personally attack me, but get "chosen" by ArbCom to be on a "special committee" to advise ArbCom. Please explain the thinking here, as I really don't understand. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
270472 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270468 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-12 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.247384880E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I'll try this for one last time. Please let your advisors fight your corner and withdraw from the discussion. -- +++$+++ ::::Mattisse, I'll try this for one last time. Please let your advisors fight your corner and withdraw from the discussion. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 00:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
270473 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270468 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-12 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.247386260E09 +++$+++ Come on Mattisse, what you were talking about with me, you're caring too much.  Let's just step around the block for a walk.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)-- +++$+++ :::::Come on Mattisse, what you were talking about with me, you're caring too much.  Let's just step around the block for a walk.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

8327 +++$+++ Wekn reven i susej eht +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8327 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-27 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.306533960E09 +++$+++ Charles, we need your help deciding wether or not to change 'Creation Science' to 'Creation science'. Here's the link: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Creation_Science#Capitals]  +++$+++ Charles, we need your help deciding wether or not to change 'Creation Science' to 'Creation science'. Here's the link: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Creation_Science#Capitals] [[User:Wekn reven i susej eht|Wekn reven i susej eht]] ([[User talk:Wekn reven i susej eht|talk]]) 15:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
8328 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8327 +++$+++ 8327 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.307673540E09 +++$+++ Add the sources with the text and it will not be reverted. Do you have reliable secondary sources?-- +++$+++ :Add the sources with the text and it will not be reverted. Do you have reliable secondary sources?--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 19:39, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
8329 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8327 +++$+++ 8327 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.307735580E09 +++$+++ Not for me to decide. You can put back your changes by reverting my edit. Use the sources you think best and other editors will review it.-- +++$+++ :Not for me to decide. You can put back your changes by reverting my edit. Use the sources you think best and other editors will review it.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 12:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

8330 +++$+++ TerriersFan +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-16 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.308215460E09 +++$+++ I have removed the {{tl|prod}} tag from [[Yarmouth bus station]], which you proposed for deletion.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{tl|prod}} template back to the article.  Instead, feel free to list it at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]].  Thanks! <!-- [[Template:Deprod]] --> I agree that this needs merging into the settlement page but deletion would prevent that.  +++$+++ I have removed the {{tl|prod}} tag from [[Yarmouth bus station]], which you proposed for deletion.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{tl|prod}} template back to the article.  Instead, feel free to list it at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]].  Thanks! <!-- [[Template:Deprod]] --> I agree that this needs merging into the settlement page but deletion would prevent that. [[User:TerriersFan|TerriersFan]] ([[User talk:TerriersFan|talk]]) 02:11, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
8331 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8330 +++$+++ 8330 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.308379080E09 +++$+++ Thanks.-- +++$+++ :Thanks.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 23:38, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

532619 +++$+++ Agathoclea +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-28 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.162065600E09 +++$+++ You just deleted a usertalk page of someone that caused disruption, and violations were marked in the talk history.  +++$+++ You just deleted a usertalk page of someone that caused disruption, and violations were marked in the talk history. [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] 13:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
532620 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532619 +++$+++ 532619 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.162065840E09 +++$+++ Which one was it exactly? The only one that could be doubtful has quoted right to vanish that I respect. Or was it another one and I deleted it mistakenly? I will fix it if you tell me which one. Regards, --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ : Which one was it exactly? The only one that could be doubtful has quoted right to vanish that I respect. Or was it another one and I deleted it mistakenly? I will fix it if you tell me which one. Regards, --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 13:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
532621 +++$+++ Agathoclea +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532619 +++$+++ 532620 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.162066680E09 +++$+++ It was [[User:Cogito ergo sumo]]. As far as right to vanish is concerned the text mentions real names and also refers to the above text. The user also appeared again under a different username after \"vanishing permanently\" see [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/E Pluribus Anthony]] (althaugh that case was handled a little to strongly))  +++$+++ ::It was [[User:Cogito ergo sumo]]. As far as right to vanish is concerned the text mentions real names and also refers to the above text. The user also appeared again under a different username after "vanishing permanently" see [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/E Pluribus Anthony]] (althaugh that case was handled a little to strongly)) [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] 13:18, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
532622 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532619 +++$+++ 532621 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.162074600E09 +++$+++ Ok, I restored it all. But please, keep an eye on it. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ ::: Ok, I restored it all. But please, keep an eye on it. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 15:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
532623 +++$+++ Agathoclea +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532619 +++$+++ 532622 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.162082640E09 +++$+++ I blanked the page down to a bare minimum.  +++$+++ ::::I blanked the page down to a bare minimum. [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] 17:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
532624 +++$+++ Cogito ergo sumo +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532619 +++$+++ 532623 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.162084440E09 +++$+++ This is untenable: regardless of accusations or the recency of my edits, I am entitled to exercise control over my user\/talk page and to request a [[:m:right to vanish]].  If I return for ''any'' reason to edit Wikipedia (which will not happen given the farce above), it will be for this.   +++$+++ :::::This is untenable: regardless of accusations or the recency of my edits, I am entitled to exercise control over my user/talk page and to request a [[:m:right to vanish]].  If I return for ''any'' reason to edit Wikipedia (which will not happen given the farce above), it will be for this.  [[User:Cogito ergo sumo|Cogito ergo sumo]] 18:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
532625 +++$+++ Agathoclea +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532619 +++$+++ 532624 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.162085280E09 +++$+++ Maybe that should go somewhere else, and you are aware that I have opposed the block of your other account[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKilo-Lima&diff=82074483&oldid=82061748] as strictly speaking there was no violation of [[WP:SOCK]] just a continuation of your reverting which got you blocked in the first place. I will make a note on AN\/I and see what the other admins consensus is.  +++$+++ ::::::Maybe that should go somewhere else, and you are aware that I have opposed the block of your other account[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKilo-Lima&diff=82074483&oldid=82061748] as strictly speaking there was no violation of [[WP:SOCK]] just a continuation of your reverting which got you blocked in the first place. I will make a note on AN/I and see what the other admins consensus is. [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] 18:28, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
532626 +++$+++ Cogito ergo sumo +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532619 +++$+++ 532625 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.162085760E09 +++$+++ I am aware -- and 'my' position above stands.  +++$+++ :::::::I am aware -- and 'my' position above stands. [[User:Cogito ergo sumo|Cogito ergo sumo]] 18:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
532627 +++$+++ Agathoclea +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532619 +++$+++ 532626 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.162089540E09 +++$+++ I have made the comments at [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Cogito_ergo_sumo_and_right_to_vanish|AN\/I]]  +++$+++ ::::::::I have made the comments at [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Cogito_ergo_sumo_and_right_to_vanish|AN/I]] [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] 19:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

8332 +++$+++ Fashionistic +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-07 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.310093160E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Fashionistic|Fashionistic]] ([[User talk:Fashionistic|talk]]) 19:46, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
8333 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8332 +++$+++ 8332 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.310097060E09 +++$+++ I see you have been adding links to the same website, and nothing else, to a number of weapons articles. This indicates that it may be your own self-published site and this would be a conflict of interest. We do not generally allow these type of links. Please read [[WP:EL]].-- +++$+++ :I see you have been adding links to the same website, and nothing else, to a number of weapons articles. This indicates that it may be your own self-published site and this would be a conflict of interest. We do not generally allow these type of links. Please read [[WP:EL]].--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 20:51, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

595372 +++$+++ HawkerTyphoon +++$+++ Courtney Akins +++$+++ 595372 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-07 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.157621160E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGwernol&diff=74255111&oldid=74253950 this edit] - don't. It's showing off, and extremely bad form. You have already broken quite a few guidleines on Wikipedia, as well as crushed Wikiquette quite conclusively - If you want to be a good user, take my advice, and please, please try and keep a low profile!  +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGwernol&diff=74255111&oldid=74253950 this edit] - don't. It's showing off, and extremely bad form. You have already broken quite a few guidleines on Wikipedia, as well as crushed Wikiquette quite conclusively - If you want to be a good user, take my advice, and please, please try and keep a low profile! [[User:HawkerTyphoon|HawkerTyphoon]] 02:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
595373 +++$+++ HawkerTyphoon +++$+++ Courtney Akins +++$+++ 595372 +++$+++ 595372 +++$+++ 2006-09-07 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.157622240E09 +++$+++ I apologise for the reverts, but I was under the impression that the copyvio hadn't been cleared up - it wasn't mentioned in your edit suummary at all. In regard to your comment on my talk page, though, I can assure you my knowledge of England and France is excellent, as I'm Half English, half French - and with a degree in European History. I'm intrigued though - you seem to be quite an expert yourself if you have books like the ones you mentioned lying around! Are you English yourself?  +++$+++ : I apologise for the reverts, but I was under the impression that the copyvio hadn't been cleared up - it wasn't mentioned in your edit suummary at all. In regard to your comment on my talk page, though, I can assure you my knowledge of England and France is excellent, as I'm Half English, half French - and with a degree in European History. I'm intrigued though - you seem to be quite an expert yourself if you have books like the ones you mentioned lying around! Are you English yourself? [[User:HawkerTyphoon|HawkerTyphoon]] 02:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
595374 +++$+++ HawkerTyphoon +++$+++ Courtney Akins +++$+++ 595372 +++$+++ 595373 +++$+++ 2006-09-07 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.157623200E09 +++$+++ The reason I'm worried is that I have ''Memoirs of the Duke of Saint Simon on the Reign of Louis XIV and the Regency'' in my loft, insured for \xa3350 - where the hell did you get your hands on one of those in the US? They're hard enough to get hold of here! Not even my National University library had a copy, so you can see why we're a bit worried about copyright violations!  +++$+++ :: The reason I'm worried is that I have ''Memoirs of the Duke of Saint Simon on the Reign of Louis XIV and the Regency'' in my loft, insured for £350 - where the hell did you get your hands on one of those in the US? They're hard enough to get hold of here! Not even my National University library had a copy, so you can see why we're a bit worried about copyright violations! [[User:HawkerTyphoon|HawkerTyphoon]] 03:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

8334 +++$+++ Fashionistic +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-07 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310102640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Fashionistic|Fashionistic]] ([[User talk:Fashionistic|talk]]) 22:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
8335 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8334 +++$+++ 8334 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.310141940E09 +++$+++ If you want to be taken seriously try adding quality content to articles instead of just external links. Can these images be uploaded to commons for use in pages? If not then your external links may be copyright infringement anyway. I still do not see that the link adds anything that would not be in a good article.-- +++$+++ :If you want to be taken seriously try adding quality content to articles instead of just external links. Can these images be uploaded to commons for use in pages? If not then your external links may be copyright infringement anyway. I still do not see that the link adds anything that would not be in a good article.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 09:19, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

270480 +++$+++ Joopercoopers +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270480 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-12 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.247394060E09 +++$+++ Dear Matisse, without prejudice to the rights and wrongs of it, I've removed Giano's description of you[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AArbitration_Committee%2FNoticeboard&diff=301635325&oldid=301620385] as it's really of so little consequence and is apparently causing behaviour from you seemingly out of all proportion to the action. The sage [[User:Geogre]] is fond of describing the internet as populated by eggshells armed with hammers. Your eggshell is supposed to be cosied by your mentors. Would you please talk this through with them, and let them act on your behalf? Kind regards -- +++$+++ Dear Matisse, without prejudice to the rights and wrongs of it, I've removed Giano's description of you[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AArbitration_Committee%2FNoticeboard&diff=301635325&oldid=301620385] as it's really of so little consequence and is apparently causing behaviour from you seemingly out of all proportion to the action. The sage [[User:Geogre]] is fond of describing the internet as populated by eggshells armed with hammers. Your eggshell is supposed to be cosied by your mentors. Would you please talk this through with them, and let them act on your behalf? Kind regards --[[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]] ([[User talk:Joopercoopers|talk]]) 03:21, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
270481 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270480 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-12 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.247410560E09 +++$+++ If the attacks are persistent, by a gang, or really severe, consult your mentors. Whichever of us you consult will probably look, among other things, about how to bring the attack(s) to a sharp halt. [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse#Principles]] describes principles that apply to all editors equally, and a brisk reminder plus a hint of the consequences of ignoring these principles will make attackers think twice. -- +++$+++ :*If the attacks are persistent, by a gang, or really severe, consult your mentors. Whichever of us you consult will probably look, among other things, about how to bring the attack(s) to a sharp halt. [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse#Principles]] describes principles that apply to all editors equally, and a brisk reminder plus a hint of the consequences of ignoring these principles will make attackers think twice. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 07:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

8337 +++$+++ Adam mugliston +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.311117600E09 +++$+++ Don't you think, what I wrote actually has to be there for me to be able to add references to it?! <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000\"> +++$+++ Don't you think, what I wrote actually has to be there for me to be able to add references to it?! <small><span style="border:1px solid #000">[[User:Adam mugliston|<font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;">&nbsp;Adam mugliston&nbsp;</font>]][[User talk:Adam mugliston|<span style="color:#BF4;background:#000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 16:20, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
8338 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.311117720E09 +++$+++ That's the point. You never did. Probably because there arn't any for that sort of dross.-- +++$+++ :That's the point. You never did. Probably because there arn't any for that sort of dross.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 16:22, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
8339 +++$+++ Adam mugliston +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 8338 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311119760E09 +++$+++ I never did, because no one ever told me to put refs on this particular article. Plus, some things can't be referenced with secondary sources and that doesn't make them non-notable. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000\"> +++$+++ ::I never did, because no one ever told me to put refs on this particular article. Plus, some things can't be referenced with secondary sources and that doesn't make them non-notable. <small><span style="border:1px solid #000">[[User:Adam mugliston|<font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;">&nbsp;Adam mugliston&nbsp;</font>]][[User talk:Adam mugliston|<span style="color:#BF4;background:#000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 16:56, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
8340 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 8339 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311133920E09 +++$+++ Actually lack of secondary sources does make them non-notable.-- +++$+++ :::Actually lack of secondary sources does make them non-notable.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 20:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
8341 +++$+++ Adam mugliston +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 8340 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311168600E09 +++$+++ How? For example, how am I suppose to prove, with your ''secondary sources'' the termini of a bus route?! Virtually impossible, yet still notable. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000\"> +++$+++ ::::How? For example, how am I suppose to prove, with your ''secondary sources'' the termini of a bus route?! Virtually impossible, yet still notable. <small><span style="border:1px solid #000">[[User:Adam mugliston|<font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;">&nbsp;Adam mugliston&nbsp;</font>]][[User talk:Adam mugliston|<span style="color:#BF4;background:#000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 06:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
8342 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.311190860E09 +++$+++ You just don't get it do you? They are not ''my'' secondary sources. Everything published in Wikipedia should be verifiable by multiple secondary sources. Notability is conferred by significant coverage in multiple secondary sources. If this is not the case it does not belong here. Take it to Wikia.-- +++$+++ :You just don't get it do you? They are not ''my'' secondary sources. Everything published in Wikipedia should be verifiable by multiple secondary sources. Notability is conferred by significant coverage in multiple secondary sources. If this is not the case it does not belong here. Take it to Wikia.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 12:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
8343 +++$+++ Adam mugliston +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 8342 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.311201660E09 +++$+++ Yes, I do get it. And by 'your' I meant Wikipedia's and it's members. For example, all towns, villages and even hamlets are notable. Yet still, many of them are not verifiable by secondary sources, because they are very small and nothing much ever happens, yet still they are notable. I'm happy here, thank you. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000\"> +++$+++ ::Yes, I do get it. And by 'your' I meant Wikipedia's and it's members. For example, all towns, villages and even hamlets are notable. Yet still, many of them are not verifiable by secondary sources, because they are very small and nothing much ever happens, yet still they are notable. I'm happy here, thank you. <small><span style="border:1px solid #000">[[User:Adam mugliston|<font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;">&nbsp;Adam mugliston&nbsp;</font>]][[User talk:Adam mugliston|<span style="color:#BF4;background:#000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 15:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
8344 +++$+++ Adam mugliston +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 8340 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.311287460E09 +++$+++ Yes, but not for all of the small hamlets. Look, there will be a constant dispute about bus routes. At least for now, if they bother you don't look at them, but there are people who do. About the colours, none of them are particularly pale, may I suggest glasses? <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000\"> +++$+++ ::::Yes, but not for all of the small hamlets. Look, there will be a constant dispute about bus routes. At least for now, if they bother you don't look at them, but there are people who do. About the colours, none of them are particularly pale, may I suggest glasses? <small><span style="border:1px solid #000">[[User:Adam mugliston|<font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;">&nbsp;Adam mugliston&nbsp;</font>]][[User talk:Adam mugliston|<span style="color:#BF4;background:#000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 15:31, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
8345 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 8344 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311300000E09 +++$+++ Yes even small hamlets in most cases. If not they will be redirected to the parish article. My eyesight is pretty good thank you and I know pale colours when I see them.-- +++$+++ :::::Yes even small hamlets in most cases. If not they will be redirected to the parish article. My eyesight is pretty good thank you and I know pale colours when I see them.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 19:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
8346 +++$+++ Adam mugliston +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 8345 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311303900E09 +++$+++ Well, in that case you shouldn't have a problem with pale colours and leave worrying about other people to themselves. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000\"> +++$+++ ::::::Well, in that case you shouldn't have a problem with pale colours and leave worrying about other people to themselves. <small><span style="border:1px solid #000">[[User:Adam mugliston|<font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;">&nbsp;Adam mugliston&nbsp;</font>]][[User talk:Adam mugliston|<span style="color:#BF4;background:#000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 20:05, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
8347 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 8346 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311304080E09 +++$+++ So you don't care about anybody else? Well I do.-- +++$+++ :::::::So you don't care about anybody else? Well I do.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 20:08, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
8348 +++$+++ Demiurge1000 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 8346 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311304200E09 +++$+++ Cool it please, Adam. The colours problem is a valid issue to raise, for the reasons already discussed (and already fixed) at the Colchester buses article. -- +++$+++ :::::::Cool it please, Adam. The colours problem is a valid issue to raise, for the reasons already discussed (and already fixed) at the Colchester buses article. --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 20:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
8349 +++$+++ Adam mugliston +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8337 +++$+++ 8348 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311306360E09 +++$+++ Sorry, Demiurge, it's just I have a solution, thanks to you, and just need Charles to keep the colours for a while, as I'm not able to do them all at once. Though, Charles still seems to have a problem with the extra column... <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000\"> +++$+++ ::::::::Sorry, Demiurge, it's just I have a solution, thanks to you, and just need Charles to keep the colours for a while, as I'm not able to do them all at once. Though, Charles still seems to have a problem with the extra column... <small><span style="border:1px solid #000">[[User:Adam mugliston|<font style="color:#000;background:#ADFF2F;">&nbsp;Adam mugliston&nbsp;</font>]][[User talk:Adam mugliston|<span style="color:#BF4;background:#000;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 20:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

270483 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-14 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.247597640E09 +++$+++ Hi, Mattise, I've just seen your 3 most recent contributions to the \"Advisory Council\" discussion (all in section \"Not about governance\") - firm but concise, constructive and level-headed. When you're good you're very very good :-) -- +++$+++ Hi, Mattise, I've just seen your 3 most recent contributions to the "Advisory Council" discussion (all in section "Not about governance") - firm but concise, constructive and level-headed. When you're good you're very very good :-) --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 11:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
270484 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270483 +++$+++ 270483 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.247665440E09 +++$+++ OTOH I don't think you should follow up on your \"The bad humor, nasty behavior, groups of entrenched editors supporting each other, may be reflective of the way thing have always been done\", which has left you vulnerable to being lured into a trap. If someone asks for examples, I'd suggest e.g. \"These problems are so widespread that it would be unfair to identify just a few of those who have been involved in such conflicts\". Unfortunately you still need to be a little more cautious than the average editor. -- +++$+++ :OTOH I don't think you should follow up on your "The bad humor, nasty behavior, groups of entrenched editors supporting each other, may be reflective of the way thing have always been done", which has left you vulnerable to being lured into a trap. If someone asks for examples, I'd suggest e.g. "These problems are so widespread that it would be unfair to identify just a few of those who have been involved in such conflicts". Unfortunately you still need to be a little more cautious than the average editor. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 06:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
270485 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270483 +++$+++ 270484 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.247685720E09 +++$+++ Philcha, thanks for the suggested wording, if asked for a follow up. I thought a lot about posting that comment before I did. There is always the tension between expressing a fundamental belief I consider important to the dialog, or out of fear, saying nothing. I appreciate your advice. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::Philcha, thanks for the suggested wording, if asked for a follow up. I thought a lot about posting that comment before I did. There is always the tension between expressing a fundamental belief I consider important to the dialog, or out of fear, saying nothing. I appreciate your advice. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

270487 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-10 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.247293740E09 +++$+++ I, for one, was not asked. Malleus was not asked. I assume you were not asked? Was Iridescent? It seems that Tony1 may have been asked (the statements are vague). I am sure others can speak up.  +++$+++ I, for one, was not asked. Malleus was not asked. I assume you were not asked? Was Iridescent? It seems that Tony1 may have been asked (the statements are vague). I am sure others can speak up. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 23:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
270488 +++$+++ Shoemaker's Holiday +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.247293860E09 +++$+++ I wasn't asked, though, given the whole Matthew Hoffman ase and a willingness o speak out when I think they've acted badly, perhaps it's understandable, given that they wouldn't want someone pointing out all their injustices and wontonviolation of the NPOV policy. (e.g Scientology, where having a view = topic ban) +++$+++ :I wasn't asked, though, given the whole Matthew Hoffman ase and a willingness o speak out when I think they've acted badly, perhaps it's understandable, given that they wouldn't want someone pointing out all their injustices and wontonviolation of the NPOV policy. (e.g Scientology, where having a view = topic ban)[[User:Shoemaker's Holiday|Shoemaker's Holiday]] ([[User talk:Shoemaker's Holiday|talk]]) 23:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
270489 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.247294100E09 +++$+++ I agree. I want to know the process entailed in the selection, or non selection. I agree that both of  you would have been an excellent members, as I do believe in your impartiality, although I do not always agree with your points of view.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I agree. I want to know the process entailed in the selection, or non selection. I agree that both of  you would have been an excellent members, as I do believe in your impartiality, although I do not always agree with your points of view.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:35, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
270490 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ 270489 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.247294520E09 +++$+++ Really it does not matter a lot\/jot who was asked. The questions are: was this thought through, what is the purpose, what kind of editors are needed, and why? The impression of a fait accompli has left a lot of editors (many well established) with a sour taste in the mouth. Arbcom was doing really well until this. '' +++$+++ ::Really it does not matter a lot/jot who was asked. The questions are: was this thought through, what is the purpose, what kind of editors are needed, and why? The impression of a fait accompli has left a lot of editors (many well established) with a sour taste in the mouth. Arbcom was doing really well until this. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
270491 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ 270490 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.247294940E09 +++$+++ Agree. I was feeling good until this. It is unclear who is at the steering wheel of this proposal, and what is their investment in having this \"committee\" whose duties are undefined and the selection process  of which is unspecified.    &mdash; +++$+++ :::Agree. I was feeling good until this. It is unclear who is at the steering wheel of this proposal, and what is their investment in having this "committee" whose duties are undefined and the selection process  of which is unspecified.    &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
270492 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ 270491 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.247295660E09 +++$+++ Whatever the thinking behind this move, and I'm keeping an open mind, I'm absolutely certain that you've got nothing to worry about personally Mattisse. That six or seven or however many members took part in your ArbCom case isn't really all that surprising, as lots of editors did. -- +++$+++ ::::Whatever the thinking behind this move, and I'm keeping an open mind, I'm absolutely certain that you've got nothing to worry about personally Mattisse. That six or seven or however many members took part in your ArbCom case isn't really all that surprising, as lots of editors did. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 00:01, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270493 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ 270492 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.247296260E09 +++$+++ Not true. There were \"key\" editors, and those are on the \"committee\", plus one who \"turned it down\" allegedly&ndash;one third.   So you thing it is a \"coincidence\"? Name those who were more key.  It is enough for me to lose my new found faith in ArbCom. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Not true. There were "key" editors, and those are on the "committee", plus one who "turned it down" allegedly&ndash;one third.   So you thing it is a "coincidence"? Name those who were more key.  It is enough for me to lose my new found faith in ArbCom. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:11, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270494 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ 270493 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.247296620E09 +++$+++ Malleus is completely right to keep an open mind and a relaxed perspective: that is what is best for wikipedia. '' +++$+++ ::::::Malleus is completely right to keep an open mind and a relaxed perspective: that is what is best for wikipedia. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 00:17, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270495 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ 270493 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.247297160E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, Mattisse. If they dared to do anything like that there would be hell to pay. But they probably know that and wouldn't bother.  +++$+++ ::::::Don't worry, Mattisse. If they dared to do anything like that there would be hell to pay. But they probably know that and wouldn't bother. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 00:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270496 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ 270495 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.247371020E09 +++$+++ Interesting that [[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]] second most edited page is [[User talk:Giano II]][http:\/\/en.wikichecker.com\/user\/?l=all&t=Joopercoopers], also on the \"list\". I don't think the names on the list are independent from each other, aside from the issue that two of them are already on ArbCom and presumably know the agenda.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::Interesting that [[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]] second most edited page is [[User talk:Giano II]][http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?l=all&t=Joopercoopers], also on the "list". I don't think the names on the list are independent from each other, aside from the issue that two of them are already on ArbCom and presumably know the agenda.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:57, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
270497 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270487 +++$+++ 270495 +++$+++ 2009-07-17 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.247887140E09 +++$+++ [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee\/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=301616813][https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee\/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=301619237][https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Advisory_Council_on_Project_Development\/Forum&diff=302134065&oldid=302133833] Not an encouraging group.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=301616813][https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=301619237][https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Advisory_Council_on_Project_Development/Forum&diff=302134065&oldid=302133833] Not an encouraging group.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

532633 +++$+++ Sd31415 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-22 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.164201420E09 +++$+++ I can help with your [[User:Tone|user page]]. Please post your response on my talk page. (Since I am very busy in real life, I may not respond immediately.) [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color=\"purple\">( +++$+++ I can help with your [[User:Tone|user page]]. Please post your response on my talk page. (Since I am very busy in real life, I may not respond immediately.) [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color="purple">([[User:Sd31415|User]] • [[User talk:Sd31415|Talk]])</font></small> 05:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
532634 +++$+++ Sd31415 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532633 +++$+++ 532633 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.164427260E09 +++$+++ I starting now...I think I will create a few subpages under your name to make editing your page easier. [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color=\"purple\">( +++$+++ :I starting now...I think I will create a few subpages under your name to make editing your page easier. [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color="purple">([[User:Sd31415|User]] • [[User talk:Sd31415|Talk]])</font></small> 20:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
532635 +++$+++ Sd31415 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532633 +++$+++ 532634 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.164429600E09 +++$+++ I did a bit of reorganization on your [[User:Tone|user page]]. If you have any questions or comments, do not hesitate to notify me on my [[User talk:Sd31415|talk page]]. After we are finished, I will move your name to the completed section on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject User Page Help\/Trading Spaces|trading spaces page]] [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color=\"purple\">( +++$+++ ::I did a bit of reorganization on your [[User:Tone|user page]]. If you have any questions or comments, do not hesitate to notify me on my [[User talk:Sd31415|talk page]]. After we are finished, I will move your name to the completed section on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject User Page Help/Trading Spaces|trading spaces page]] [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color="purple">([[User:Sd31415|User]] • [[User talk:Sd31415|Talk]])</font></small> 20:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
532636 +++$+++ Sd31415 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532633 +++$+++ 532635 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.164439380E09 +++$+++ \u2192'''Note''': I basically cleaned up your [[User:Tone|page]]. But if you would like the design that I have<sup>created by [[User:BradBeattie|Brad Beattie]]<\/sup>, please [[User talk:Sd31415|tell me]]. [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color=\"purple\">( +++$+++ :::→'''Note''': I basically cleaned up your [[User:Tone|page]]. But if you would like the design that I have<sup>created by [[User:BradBeattie|Brad Beattie]]</sup>, please [[User talk:Sd31415|tell me]]. [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color="purple">([[User:Sd31415|User]] • [[User talk:Sd31415|Talk]])</font></small> 23:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
532637 +++$+++ Sd31415 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532633 +++$+++ 532636 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.164439920E09 +++$+++ I will now begin. I'll try to bring back to Slovenian UBX. [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color=\"purple\">( +++$+++ ::::I will now begin. I'll try to bring back to Slovenian UBX. [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color="purple">([[User:Sd31415|User]] • [[User talk:Sd31415|Talk]])</font></small> 23:32, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
532638 +++$+++ Sd31415 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532633 +++$+++ 532637 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.164442440E09 +++$+++ Job done. If you do not mind I will now move your name to the completed section on the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject User Page Help\/Trading Spaces|trading spaces page]]. Thanks for enlisting my help! [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color=\"purple\">( +++$+++ :::::Job done. If you do not mind I will now move your name to the completed section on the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject User Page Help/Trading Spaces|trading spaces page]]. Thanks for enlisting my help! [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color="purple">([[User:Sd31415|User]] • [[User talk:Sd31415|Talk]])</font></small> 00:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

8350 +++$+++ Demiurge1000 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.311286680E09 +++$+++ If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you continue to edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- +++$+++ If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you continue to edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 15:18, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
8351 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8350 +++$+++ 8350 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.311299700E09 +++$+++ Oops. Thought it was only two.-- +++$+++ :Oops. Thought it was only two.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 18:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
8352 +++$+++ Ian.thomson +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8350 +++$+++ 8350 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311420600E09 +++$+++ {{tps}}(Explained various reasons why his edits should have been removed, while still addressing sources and trying to get him to go along with WP:NPOV and RS.)  +++$+++ :{{tps}}(Explained various reasons why his edits should have been removed, while still addressing sources and trying to get him to go along with WP:NPOV and RS.) [[User:Ian.thomson|Ian.thomson]] ([[User talk:Ian.thomson|talk]]) 04:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
8353 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8350 +++$+++ 8352 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.311433380E09 +++$+++ Good on you for trying Ian but I think you are likely to get more sense from talking to a lamp post. Have a good weekend.-- +++$+++ ::Good on you for trying Ian but I think you are likely to get more sense from talking to a lamp post. Have a good weekend.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 08:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
8354 +++$+++ Ian.thomson +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8350 +++$+++ 8353 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.311457200E09 +++$+++ Looking over his other edits, that seems likely, but the more things are explained amd the more detailed they're explained, the easier it'll be to say \"he'll never positively contribute.\"  You have a good weekend, too.   +++$+++ :::Looking over his other edits, that seems likely, but the more things are explained amd the more detailed they're explained, the easier it'll be to say "he'll never positively contribute."  You have a good weekend, too.  [[User:Ian.thomson|Ian.thomson]] ([[User talk:Ian.thomson|talk]]) 14:40, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

532640 +++$+++ Sd31415 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-25 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.164489540E09 +++$+++ Yes, I mostly use Mozilla Firefox. I looked at my page and your page on my Internet Explorer, and I saw the problem. I tried editing mine without improvement. If you can, you should download Mozilla Firefox, because boxes (and a lot of other formatting styles) are best viewed on Mozilla Firefox. [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color=\"purple\">( +++$+++ Yes, I mostly use Mozilla Firefox. I looked at my page and your page on my Internet Explorer, and I saw the problem. I tried editing mine without improvement. If you can, you should download Mozilla Firefox, because boxes (and a lot of other formatting styles) are best viewed on Mozilla Firefox. [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color="purple">([[User:Sd31415|User]] • [[User talk:Sd31415|Talk]])</font></small><sup>I see Slovenia had a dan Rudolfa Maistra two days ago.</sup> 13:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
532641 +++$+++ Sd31415 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532640 +++$+++ 532640 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.164490500E09 +++$+++ Your welcome. Thanks for enlisting my help! [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color=\"purple\">( +++$+++ :Your welcome. Thanks for enlisting my help! [[Image:EtruscanS-01.png|15px]] [[Image:PhoenicianD-01.png|15px]] [[Image:Pi-symbol.svg|15px]] <small><font color="purple">([[User:Sd31415|User]] • [[User talk:Sd31415|Talk]])</font></small> 13:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

394608 +++$+++ Aldaron +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394608 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-15 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.242442500E09 +++$+++ Looking at the [[Wikipedia:Layout#Standard_appendices|style guide]], and and at the documentation for the templates relevant for the \"standard appendices\" after \"see also\", it strikes me that, although all of these appendices ''should'' be \"small\", if any of them are, that there's only template support for making \"notes\" and \"references\" small. Is there an agreed to approach to making \"further reading\" and \"external links\" small also? The obvious way to proceed is to use {{tl|refbegin}} and {{tl|refend}}. Is that the way to go? Are there {{tl|notesbegin}} or {{tl|furtherbegin}} templates that I've missed? Thanks for any guidance! <span style= \"font-family: papyrus; color:silver\">  &mdash;  +++$+++ Looking at the [[Wikipedia:Layout#Standard_appendices|style guide]], and and at the documentation for the templates relevant for the "standard appendices" after "see also", it strikes me that, although all of these appendices ''should'' be "small", if any of them are, that there's only template support for making "notes" and "references" small. Is there an agreed to approach to making "further reading" and "external links" small also? The obvious way to proceed is to use {{tl|refbegin}} and {{tl|refend}}. Is that the way to go? Are there {{tl|notesbegin}} or {{tl|furtherbegin}} templates that I've missed? Thanks for any guidance! <span style= "font-family: papyrus; color:silver">  &mdash; [[User:Aldaron|Aldaron]] &bull; <small>[[User talk:Aldaron|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Aldaron|C]] </small> </span> 19:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
394609 +++$+++ Aldaron +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394608 +++$+++ 394608 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.242442800E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Herschel_Space_Observatory&action=view&diff=290157390 Here]'s what I mean, if that wasn't clear. <span style= \"font-family: papyrus; color:silver\">  &mdash;  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Herschel_Space_Observatory&action=view&diff=290157390 Here]'s what I mean, if that wasn't clear. <span style= "font-family: papyrus; color:silver">  &mdash; [[User:Aldaron|Aldaron]] &bull; <small>[[User talk:Aldaron|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Aldaron|C]] </small> </span> 20:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
394610 +++$+++ Anthony5429 +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394608 +++$+++ 394609 +++$+++ 2009-05-16 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.242522000E09 +++$+++ I don't know of any other templates like that, but you are certainly welcome to start your own template for that purpose and see what others feel about it. Cheers! -- +++$+++ ::I don't know of any other templates like that, but you are certainly welcome to start your own template for that purpose and see what others feel about it. Cheers! --[[User:Anthony5429|Anthony5429]] ([[User talk:Anthony5429#top|talk]]) 18:00, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

8355 +++$+++ Simple Bob +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8355 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.311542520E09 +++$+++ I have just submitted a bunch of Hampshire bus routes for deletion - take a look at my contribs or today's AfD log and feel free to comment. Rather than submit every bus route article in the UK for AfD, which I think should be done, do you know if there is there a more effective way to do it? -- +++$+++ I have just submitted a bunch of Hampshire bus routes for deletion - take a look at my contribs or today's AfD log and feel free to comment. Rather than submit every bus route article in the UK for AfD, which I think should be done, do you know if there is there a more effective way to do it? --[[User:Simple Bob|Simple Bob<sup> a.k.a. The Spaminator</sup>]] ([[User talk:Simple Bob|Talk]]) 14:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
8356 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8355 +++$+++ 8355 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311565920E09 +++$+++ Good luck with that. These AfD debates are not supposed to be a ballot. Closing amins should give due weight to the strength of the various arguments put forward and discount \"me too\" meatpuppets but in practise they tend to sit on the fence and call no consensus. It would certainly be easier to have some kind of category deletion but I do not know how that would be done.-- +++$+++ :Good luck with that. These AfD debates are not supposed to be a ballot. Closing amins should give due weight to the strength of the various arguments put forward and discount "me too" meatpuppets but in practise they tend to sit on the fence and call no consensus. It would certainly be easier to have some kind of category deletion but I do not know how that would be done.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 20:52, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

8357 +++$+++ Worm That Turned +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311692400E09 +++$+++ Hi Charles. I've noticed your recent dealings with Adam mugliston and have been watching his talk page. This morning, he made a very reasonable request [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Adam_mugliston&curid=18953420&diff=441485309&oldid=441420219] that you do not post on his talk page, except for notifications. He has identified that discussions between you on user talk pages are generally destructive rather than constructive and as I happen to agree I recommend that you comply with that request.  +++$+++ Hi Charles. I've noticed your recent dealings with Adam mugliston and have been watching his talk page. This morning, he made a very reasonable request [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adam_mugliston&curid=18953420&diff=441485309&oldid=441420219] that you do not post on his talk page, except for notifications. He has identified that discussions between you on user talk pages are generally destructive rather than constructive and as I happen to agree I recommend that you comply with that request. [[User:Worm That Turned|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><font color="#000">'''''Worm'''''<sup>TT</sup></font></span>]]&nbsp;<span style="font-weight:bold;">&middot;</span>&#32;([[User Talk:Worm That Turned|talk]]) 08:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
8358 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8357 +++$+++ 8357 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 08:45:00 +++$+++ 1.311695100E09 +++$+++ Hi Worm. I would be happy not to have to go to Adam's talkpage as his large loud sickly green signature all over the place is rather puke making. If he made any reasonable attempt to abide by the normal editing guidelines I would not need to go there. There are many problems that you as his mentor should be addressing as shown by his recent post at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/List_of_bus_routes_in_Peterborough_%282nd_nomination%29#]. Here he uses the spurious \"other stuff exists\" arguments to justify adding more non-notable material. He then admits that it is original research and that it is intended to be a source of detailed information i.e. a directory. In spite of good advice from yourself and many other experienced editors there has been no progress towards writing properly sourced encyclopedic prose, only more listcruft. He is clearly not stupid which makes it likely that rather than failing to understand these issues he is deliberately ignoring them. To come back to your original request I will continue to edit where I see fit.-- +++$+++ :Hi Worm. I would be happy not to have to go to Adam's talkpage as his large loud sickly green signature all over the place is rather puke making. If he made any reasonable attempt to abide by the normal editing guidelines I would not need to go there. There are many problems that you as his mentor should be addressing as shown by his recent post at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_bus_routes_in_Peterborough_%282nd_nomination%29#]. Here he uses the spurious "other stuff exists" arguments to justify adding more non-notable material. He then admits that it is original research and that it is intended to be a source of detailed information i.e. a directory. In spite of good advice from yourself and many other experienced editors there has been no progress towards writing properly sourced encyclopedic prose, only more listcruft. He is clearly not stupid which makes it likely that rather than failing to understand these issues he is deliberately ignoring them. To come back to your original request I will continue to edit where I see fit.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 08:45, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
8359 +++$+++ Worm That Turned +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8357 +++$+++ 8358 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 09:07:00 +++$+++ 1.311696420E09 +++$+++ Returning to my original recommendation, be careful about editing \"where you see fit\", Wikipedia has a policy on [[WP:Harassment|harassment]] - \"Harassment, threats, intimidation, '''repeated annoying and unwanted contact or attention''', and repeated personal attacks may reduce an editor's enjoyment of Wikipedia and thus cause disruption to the project.\" (bolding added). Adam has made a reasonable request for you to stop posting on his talk page, nipping a possible larger future problem in the bud. Keep that in mind if you see fit to edit on his talk page.  +++$+++ ::Returning to my original recommendation, be careful about editing "where you see fit", Wikipedia has a policy on [[WP:Harassment|harassment]] - "Harassment, threats, intimidation, '''repeated annoying and unwanted contact or attention''', and repeated personal attacks may reduce an editor's enjoyment of Wikipedia and thus cause disruption to the project." (bolding added). Adam has made a reasonable request for you to stop posting on his talk page, nipping a possible larger future problem in the bud. Keep that in mind if you see fit to edit on his talk page. [[User:Worm That Turned|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><font color="#000">'''''Worm'''''<sup>TT</sup></font></span>]]&nbsp;<span style="font-weight:bold;">&middot;</span>&#32;([[User Talk:Worm That Turned|talk]]) 09:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
8360 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8357 +++$+++ 8359 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311711180E09 +++$+++ Featured lists that achieve featured list status are lists of notable things and they tend to have quite a lot of prose in them. They are nothing like the original research databases that Adam and a few others have been compiling. I am not harrassing anyone but I will continue to point out breaches of WP's basic policies when necessary. If you choose to interpret that as harrassment that is your problem.-- +++$+++ :::Featured lists that achieve featured list status are lists of notable things and they tend to have quite a lot of prose in them. They are nothing like the original research databases that Adam and a few others have been compiling. I am not harrassing anyone but I will continue to point out breaches of WP's basic policies when necessary. If you choose to interpret that as harrassment that is your problem.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 13:13, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

532647 +++$+++ 64.191.230.157 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-30 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.164937080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:64.191.230.157|64.191.230.157]] 17:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
532648 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532647 +++$+++ 532647 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.164952500E09 +++$+++ In that case, no problem. Page is restored. For proper formatting, I advise you to check some similar articles and try to format it in the similar way. Any by the way, if you upload a photo, you should always correctly state the copyright info. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : In that case, no problem. Page is restored. For proper formatting, I advise you to check some similar articles and try to format it in the similar way. Any by the way, if you upload a photo, you should always correctly state the copyright info. Regards, --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 21:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

8361 +++$+++ Stephfo +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.311696720E09 +++$+++ I just would like to ask you about the rationale for your removal of list of countries after India, South Korea, Brazil and Israel have been added as ones with widespread creationism as opposition to evolutionary views, do you have anything personal against these countries or why you've been tolerating the list for so long until these have been added? Pls., clarify. Thanx in advance.-- +++$+++ I just would like to ask you about the rationale for your removal of list of countries after India, South Korea, Brazil and Israel have been added as ones with widespread creationism as opposition to evolutionary views, do you have anything personal against these countries or why you've been tolerating the list for so long until these have been added? Pls., clarify. Thanx in advance.--[[User:Stephfo|Stephfo]] ([[User talk:Stephfo|talk]]) 09:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
8362 +++$+++  +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8361 +++$+++ 8361 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311697560E09 +++$+++ If I may butt in -- the longer, and thus more prominent, a list becomes, the more scrutiny it will be under, and the more important becomes the question of \"does this really belong here?\" A few words, connected (albeit loosely and without substantiation) to the topic is likely to be overlooked. A far longer, and less connected, list is not. <font face=\"Antiqua, serif\">'' +++$+++ :If I may butt in -- the longer, and thus more prominent, a list becomes, the more scrutiny it will be under, and the more important becomes the question of "does this really belong here?" A few words, connected (albeit loosely and without substantiation) to the topic is likely to be overlooked. A far longer, and less connected, list is not. <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub><sup>''('''[[M:Precisionism|P]]''')</sup></font> 09:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
8363 +++$+++ 213.52.31.122 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8361 +++$+++ 8362 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311699720E09 +++$+++ But then why you removed the list from section \"Degree of acceptance\", it does not make sense to speak about degree of acceptance if you are not mentioning by whom, and here is the place where countries such as Korea or Brazil fit well in the picture, all article is full of controversy in US, but this is not the whole world, a fortiori because Korea is held to be \"creatoinist capital in the world in density\" and in Brazil they teach creationism along evolutionary theory, thus it is absolutely awkward to elaborate on this topic w\/o mentioning countries highly involved in stating their objections to evolution. Without that the article becomes a propaganda of proponents of evolutionary view w\/o giving any room to countries famous for opposing that view by majority of their poppulation.--[[Special:Contributions\/213.52.31.122|213.52.31.122]] ( +++$+++ :: But then why you removed the list from section "Degree of acceptance", it does not make sense to speak about degree of acceptance if you are not mentioning by whom, and here is the place where countries such as Korea or Brazil fit well in the picture, all article is full of controversy in US, but this is not the whole world, a fortiori because Korea is held to be "creatoinist capital in the world in density" and in Brazil they teach creationism along evolutionary theory, thus it is absolutely awkward to elaborate on this topic w/o mentioning countries highly involved in stating their objections to evolution. Without that the article becomes a propaganda of proponents of evolutionary view w/o giving any room to countries famous for opposing that view by majority of their poppulation.--[[Special:Contributions/213.52.31.122|213.52.31.122]] ([[User talk:213.52.31.122|talk]]) 10:02, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
8364 +++$+++  +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8361 +++$+++ 8363 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.311704520E09 +++$+++ Yes, because it was not articulating either an \"Objection to evolution\", or a rebuttal of such an objection. The purpose of that section <u>is not<\/u> ''any and all information related to \"degree of acceptance\"'', but rather degree of acceptance ''as it relates to an objection to evolution''. <font face=\"Antiqua, serif\">'' +++$+++ :::Yes, because it was not articulating either an "Objection to evolution", or a rebuttal of such an objection. The purpose of that section <u>is not</u> ''any and all information related to "degree of acceptance"'', but rather degree of acceptance ''as it relates to an objection to evolution''. <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub><sup>''('''[[M:Precisionism|P]]''')</sup></font> 11:22, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
8365 +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ Charlesdrakew +++$+++ 8361 +++$+++ 8364 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.311727380E09 +++$+++ This sounds as though it belongs at the creationism article if anywhere. Wikipedia articles are intended to give a broad overview of a subject without going into every detail and where to stop is a matter for editorial consensus.-- +++$+++ ::::This sounds as though it belongs at the creationism article if anywhere. Wikipedia articles are intended to give a broad overview of a subject without going into every detail and where to stop is a matter for editorial consensus.--[[User:Charlesdrakew|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesdrakew#top|talk]]) 17:43, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

270507 +++$+++ Doc Tropics +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-19 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.248073020E09 +++$+++ We had a couple reverts between us, but I think I found the reason for our misunderstanding: there is an unsourced sentence in [[Primate]] which suggests that they \"may\" date back 86mya. I din't initially notice its lack of a ref, but just took it at face value when comparing the numbers cited in each article. This was the cause of my confusion so I added a fact tag to that and now completely accept your revions at [[Human Evolution]]. Thanks, and happy editing.  +++$+++ We had a couple reverts between us, but I think I found the reason for our misunderstanding: there is an unsourced sentence in [[Primate]] which suggests that they "may" date back 86mya. I din't initially notice its lack of a ref, but just took it at face value when comparing the numbers cited in each article. This was the cause of my confusion so I added a fact tag to that and now completely accept your revions at [[Human Evolution]]. Thanks, and happy editing. [[User:Doc Tropics|Doc ]] <font color ="green">[[User talk:Doc Tropics|Tropics]]</font > 23:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
270508 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270507 +++$+++ 270507 +++$+++ 2009-07-20 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.248073440E09 +++$+++ OK, as 85 million didn't make sense. The article is woefully under referenced.  Thanks! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, as 85 million didn't make sense. The article is woefully under referenced.  Thanks! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

532653 +++$+++ Tonicthebrown +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-01 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.165013880E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Tonicthebrown|Tonicthebrown]] 14:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
532654 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532653 +++$+++ 532653 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.165020300E09 +++$+++ Hi. After reconsidering my decision, I see I was a bit fast. I will restore the article but please, expand it a little and provide some more references. At it present state, it provides very few information. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. After reconsidering my decision, I see I was a bit fast. I will restore the article but please, expand it a little and provide some more references. At it present state, it provides very few information. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 16:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

532655 +++$+++ *Spark* +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-02 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.165098060E09 +++$+++ You deleted [[:Image:limhof.jpg]] without verifying that it *isn't* orphaned.  It's used here: [[Long Island Music Hall of Fame]].  Please restore it, thanks.  +++$+++ You deleted [[:Image:limhof.jpg]] without verifying that it *isn't* orphaned.  It's used here: [[Long Island Music Hall of Fame]].  Please restore it, thanks. [[User:*Spark*/s|<font color="green">*Spark*</font>]] 14:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
532656 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532655 +++$+++ 532655 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.165098420E09 +++$+++ Indeed, it wasn't orphaned. My mistake. Restored. --''' +++$+++ : Indeed, it wasn't orphaned. My mistake. Restored. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 14:27, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
532657 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532655 +++$+++ 532655 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.165123680E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. But please, reword it, because a great part of the article reads like an advertisment at the moment. And I moved it to a capitalized title, I guess it should be this way. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. But please, reword it, because a great part of the article reads like an advertisment at the moment. And I moved it to a capitalized title, I guess it should be this way. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 21:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
532658 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532655 +++$+++ 532655 +++$+++ 2006-12-03 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.165175220E09 +++$+++ I saw it was deleted again and therefore I checked the log. I see the deletion of the article was justified with [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Battles of Norghan|this]] discussion. There is not much I can do about it but you can complain at [[Wikipedia:Undeletion policy]]. --''' +++$+++ : I saw it was deleted again and therefore I checked the log. I see the deletion of the article was justified with [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battles of Norghan|this]] discussion. There is not much I can do about it but you can complain at [[Wikipedia:Undeletion policy]]. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 11:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

270513 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270513 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-27 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.248678240E09 +++$+++ I like to like the people I write about.  His involvement in Stalin's purges makes that very difficult indeed.  Just so much blood.  At least Speer never got his hands dirty.  Still, I'll keep moving forward on the article.  I don't know how long it will take me to finish.  A while, probably, it is easy enough to write biography, but the discussions of his premiership will take more sources and more time.-- +++$+++ I like to like the people I write about.  His involvement in Stalin's purges makes that very difficult indeed.  Just so much blood.  At least Speer never got his hands dirty.  Still, I'll keep moving forward on the article.  I don't know how long it will take me to finish.  A while, probably, it is easy enough to write biography, but the discussions of his premiership will take more sources and more time.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
270514 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270513 +++$+++ 270513 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.248679740E09 +++$+++ Think of him visiting China, where Mao invited him to swim in a pool. Fat and unfit,  Khrushchev thrashed about in the shallow end with a floating device, while Mao elegantly  dove in and swam several laps using a variety of strokes&mdash;all the while lecturing Khrushchev on communist doctrine. There are so many scenes like that, it  becomes unreal. My main beef with the book is that all I can say is, \"How could this possibly have happened?\" Meeting with world leaders that end up crass shouting matches and brute ego plays. It is interesting to contemplate a person who can figure out how to build a motorcycle all on his own as a kid, but is almost totally uneducated, learning on the job. making fantastic agriculture errors, like declaring American corn was the way to go for all of the Soviet Union. Like much of Russian history, it is incomprehensible how all of this could have occurred. He reminds me of some very severe criminals I have known. Repulsive, yet charming and fascinating. &mdash; +++$+++ :Think of him visiting China, where Mao invited him to swim in a pool. Fat and unfit,  Khrushchev thrashed about in the shallow end with a floating device, while Mao elegantly  dove in and swam several laps using a variety of strokes&mdash;all the while lecturing Khrushchev on communist doctrine. There are so many scenes like that, it  becomes unreal. My main beef with the book is that all I can say is, "How could this possibly have happened?" Meeting with world leaders that end up crass shouting matches and brute ego plays. It is interesting to contemplate a person who can figure out how to build a motorcycle all on his own as a kid, but is almost totally uneducated, learning on the job. making fantastic agriculture errors, like declaring American corn was the way to go for all of the Soviet Union. Like much of Russian history, it is incomprehensible how all of this could have occurred. He reminds me of some very severe criminals I have known. Repulsive, yet charming and fascinating. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:29, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
270515 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270513 +++$+++ 270514 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.248679980E09 +++$+++ I like to think of him on his American tour, visiting his friend Gornt in Iowa, and enjoying his trip to IBM more for the self service cafeteria than for the machines.  Yet nearly alienating Eisenhower at Camp David, and a year later, destroying the Paris Conference before returning to New York, shoe in hand.  Very primitive emotions, yet in his way extremely intelligent.-- +++$+++ ::I like to think of him on his American tour, visiting his friend Gornt in Iowa, and enjoying his trip to IBM more for the self service cafeteria than for the machines.  Yet nearly alienating Eisenhower at Camp David, and a year later, destroying the Paris Conference before returning to New York, shoe in hand.  Very primitive emotions, yet in his way extremely intelligent.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
270516 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270513 +++$+++ 270515 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.248736560E09 +++$+++ He lived in horrible filth in the industrial\/mining job. The poverty  described was unbelievable (although I have read such before). Then feeling \"insecure\" as the book repeatedly says, through wits, wiles and hard work, he gets to the top and enjoys it.  An animal cunning and a natural understanding of people. He talked easily to others, \"jabbered\" and joked. I think he lived in the moment, relishing enjoyment, with little personal reflection. So he felt bad when the brutality hit him viscerally in the face, as when confronted with the reality a broken old friend, but the rest of the time it was pushed to the side by his immersion in  work and political maneuvering that demanded full attention. Just scraw \"arrest\" across the top of a paper.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::He lived in horrible filth in the industrial/mining job. The poverty  described was unbelievable (although I have read such before). Then feeling "insecure" as the book repeatedly says, through wits, wiles and hard work, he gets to the top and enjoys it.  An animal cunning and a natural understanding of people. He talked easily to others, "jabbered" and joked. I think he lived in the moment, relishing enjoyment, with little personal reflection. So he felt bad when the brutality hit him viscerally in the face, as when confronted with the reality a broken old friend, but the rest of the time it was pushed to the side by his immersion in  work and political maneuvering that demanded full attention. Just scraw "arrest" across the top of a paper.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

394611 +++$+++ Aspects +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-10 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.257899820E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of \"file\" pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Aspects|Aspects]] ([[User talk:Aspects|talk]]) 16:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
394612 +++$+++ Anthony5429 +++$+++ Karam.Anthony.K +++$+++ 394611 +++$+++ 394611 +++$+++ 2010-06-19 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.277000940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the info. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the info. --[[User:Anthony5429|Anthony5429]] ([[User talk:Anthony5429#top|talk]]) 19:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

515292 +++$+++ GentlemanGhost +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515292 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-02 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.246527900E09 +++$+++ Thanks! That was quick! -- +++$+++ Thanks! That was quick! --[[User:GentlemanGhost|GentlemanGhost]] ([[User talk:GentlemanGhost|talk]]) 02:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
515293 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515292 +++$+++ 515292 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.246528140E09 +++$+++ Cheers. :) - +++$+++ :Cheers. :) -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 02:49, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

270517 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-27 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.248747900E09 +++$+++ I know it's frustrating and a sore spot for you, but comments like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Disinfoboxman&diff=304483290&oldid=304479152 this] won't help matters. I'd advise you to stay well away from any discussions related to Geogre\/Giano\/Bishonen for the time being.  +++$+++ I know it's frustrating and a sore spot for you, but comments like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Disinfoboxman&diff=304483290&oldid=304479152 this] won't help matters. I'd advise you to stay well away from any discussions related to Geogre/Giano/Bishonen for the time being. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 19:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
270518 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270517 +++$+++ 270517 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.248748020E09 +++$+++ OK. I didn't think anyone would notice. Sorry. Won't do it again.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :OK. I didn't think anyone would notice. Sorry. Won't do it again.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:27, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
270519 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270517 +++$+++ 270518 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.248748380E09 +++$+++ Not a problem. Just looking out for you.  +++$+++ ::Not a problem. Just looking out for you. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 19:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
270520 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270517 +++$+++ 270518 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.248748440E09 +++$+++ If you're interested as to how I stumbled upon that exchange, see [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/A. E. J. Collins\/archive1]].  +++$+++ ::If you're interested as to how I stumbled upon that exchange, see [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/A. E. J. Collins/archive1]]. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 19:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
270521 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270517 +++$+++ 270520 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.248748860E09 +++$+++ Very interesting! Thanks!  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Very interesting! Thanks!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

532662 +++$+++ RockMFR +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532662 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-22 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.166845920E09 +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Image:Geh.jpg}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Image:Geh.jpg]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ---  +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Image:Geh.jpg}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Image:Geh.jpg]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --- [[User:RockMFR|RockMFR]] 19:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
532663 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532662 +++$+++ 532662 +++$+++ 2006-12-22 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.166853540E09 +++$+++ Are you sure I closed it? The article was not even deleted, as far as I can see. --''' +++$+++ : Are you sure I closed it? The article was not even deleted, as far as I can see. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 21:59, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

8376 +++$+++ Alecsdaniel +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8376 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-27 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.235763780E09 +++$+++ Hello Max. I've got a question: why do you keep removing the [[Romanian Singles Chart]] from the \"[[A New Day Has Come (song)|A New Day Has Come]]\" page?  +++$+++ Hello Max. I've got a question: why do you keep removing the [[Romanian Singles Chart]] from the "[[A New Day Has Come (song)|A New Day Has Come]]" page? [[User:Alecsdaniel|Alecsdaniel]] ([[User talk:Alecsdaniel|talk]]) 11:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
8377 +++$+++ Alecsdaniel +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8376 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-27 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.235770200E09 +++$+++ Oh :( OK.  +++$+++ ::Oh :( OK. [[User:Alecsdaniel|Alecsdaniel]] ([[User talk:Alecsdaniel|talk]]) 13:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

270522 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270522 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-20 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.248100800E09 +++$+++ I've remove the comment at the top of the FAR page saying that people should only have one FAR at a time, since the de facto operating consensus was that multiple ones were allowed. Just in case you were thinking of nominating another (or three or four) while Greeks was still open, as you raised concerns about people being too worried\/huilty about keeping old FARs. ''' +++$+++ I've remove the comment at the top of the FAR page saying that people should only have one FAR at a time, since the de facto operating consensus was that multiple ones were allowed. Just in case you were thinking of nominating another (or three or four) while Greeks was still open, as you raised concerns about people being too worried/huilty about keeping old FARs. '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">cricket calendar poll!</font>]]'') [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Paid_editing#Statement_by_YellowMonkey|paid editing=POV]] 07:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
270523 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270522 +++$+++ 270522 +++$+++ 2009-07-20 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.248135840E09 +++$+++ The process does go excruciatingly slow. I nominated another. Hope my nom is OK. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :The process does go excruciatingly slow. I nominated another. Hope my nom is OK. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
270524 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270522 +++$+++ 270523 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.248172080E09 +++$+++ It's fine. Nishkid, Cirt and myself all have 4+ up there ''' +++$+++ ::It's fine. Nishkid, Cirt and myself all have 4+ up there '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">cricket calendar poll!</font>]]'') [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Paid_editing#Statement_by_YellowMonkey|paid editing=POV]] 03:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

569375 +++$+++ Martha Lois +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-14 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.166157780E09 +++$+++ Thank you for offering to adopt me.  I just started using Wikipedia a few months ago, so I don't know much about editing pages.  I will appreciate any comments, suggestions, even criticism that you have for me.  As for time zone I am on Central Time(U.S.A.).-- +++$+++ Thank you for offering to adopt me.  I just started using Wikipedia a few months ago, so I don't know much about editing pages.  I will appreciate any comments, suggestions, even criticism that you have for me.  As for time zone I am on Central Time(U.S.A.).--[[User:Martha Lois|Martha Lois]] 20:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
569376 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569375 +++$+++ 569375 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.166160240E09 +++$+++ OK, if you are on Central US time then I will go to bed at around 1600 your time, so there may be a lag in our correspondence from time to time!  I see the adoption service as more of a mentor\/guidance facility, where I can try to answer all of your questions either from experience or doing research on your behalf and giving my opinion.  It's your service, so please feel free to ask me any questions that occur to you in the course of editing.  I'll try and do my best for you! Regards,  +++$+++ :OK, if you are on Central US time then I will go to bed at around 1600 your time, so there may be a lag in our correspondence from time to time!  I see the adoption service as more of a mentor/guidance facility, where I can try to answer all of your questions either from experience or doing research on your behalf and giving my opinion.  It's your service, so please feel free to ask me any questions that occur to you in the course of editing.  I'll try and do my best for you! Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

270525 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270525 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-23 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.248338400E09 +++$+++ I don't have a problem personally, no ''' +++$+++ I don't have a problem personally, no '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">cricket calendar poll!</font>]]'') [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Paid_editing#Statement_by_YellowMonkey|paid editing=POV]] 01:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
270526 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270525 +++$+++ 270525 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.248338520E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, thanks! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:42, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

8383 +++$+++ Sparks Fly +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-10 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.241992380E09 +++$+++ I requested the article peer review, and a [[User:Jaespinoza|experienced user]] said that nothing with new revision was wrong. Anyway, I will try to push it to GA and then we will see if the article misses something. Regards, '''<font color=\"00778F\"> +++$+++ I requested the article peer review, and a [[User:Jaespinoza|experienced user]] said that nothing with new revision was wrong. Anyway, I will try to push it to GA and then we will see if the article misses something. Regards, '''<font color="00778F">[[User:Sparks Fly|Sparks]]</font>  <font color="009FBF">[[User talk:Sparks Fly|Fly]]</font>''' 14:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
8384 +++$+++ Sparks Fly +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8383 +++$+++ 8383 +++$+++ 2009-05-11 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.242025560E09 +++$+++ I really hope we can reach a consensus, otherwise I will have to kill you. Thanks, '''<font color=\"00778F\"> +++$+++ :I really hope we can reach a consensus, otherwise I will have to kill you. Thanks, '''<font color="00778F">[[User:Sparks Fly|Sparks]]</font>  <font color="009FBF">[[User talk:Sparks Fly|Fly]]</font>''' 00:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
8385 +++$+++ Sparks Fly +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8383 +++$+++ 8384 +++$+++ 2009-05-11 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.242088560E09 +++$+++ I reverted again, we still need to discuss. '''<font color=\"00778F\"> +++$+++ ::I reverted again, we still need to discuss. '''<font color="00778F">[[User:Sparks Fly|Sparks]]</font>  <font color="009FBF">[[User talk:Sparks Fly|Fly]]</font>''' 17:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
8386 +++$+++ Sparks Fly +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8383 +++$+++ 8385 +++$+++ 2009-05-12 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.242172500E09 +++$+++ Here we go again. '''<font color=\"00778F\"> +++$+++ :::Here we go again. '''<font color="00778F">[[User:Sparks Fly|Sparks]]</font>  <font color="009FBF">[[User talk:Sparks Fly|Fly]]</font>''' 16:55, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

270529 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270529 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-24 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.248499560E09 +++$+++ I have 4 GA reviews in progress, and real life (yes, I have one!) is hectic at present, so I may not be able to contribute much to [[Fertilisation of Orchids]] in the next week or so - sorry. -- +++$+++ I have 4 GA reviews in progress, and real life (yes, I have one!) is hectic at present, so I may not be able to contribute much to [[Fertilisation of Orchids]] in the next week or so - sorry. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 22:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
270530 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270529 +++$+++ 270529 +++$+++ 2009-07-24 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.248499860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the link. I tried some things and it works. Spits out the information.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks for the link. I tried some things and it works. Spits out the information.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
270531 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270529 +++$+++ 270530 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.248545940E09 +++$+++ <edit conflict on the article!> Thought someone was laughing at ''Orchids''! Sorry that focus has been lost a bit in trying to expand the aspects of relationship to other projects and Darwin's life at the time, will have a go a tightening things up. Maybe worth pulling it from FAC until there's been more of a chance to resolve these issues and get feedback, possibly reconsidering the article name? Don't know how to do that, myself, do I just make an announcement on the FAC page? . .  +++$+++ ::<edit conflict on the article!> Thought someone was laughing at ''Orchids''! Sorry that focus has been lost a bit in trying to expand the aspects of relationship to other projects and Darwin's life at the time, will have a go a tightening things up. Maybe worth pulling it from FAC until there's been more of a chance to resolve these issues and get feedback, possibly reconsidering the article name? Don't know how to do that, myself, do I just make an announcement on the FAC page? . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 11:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
270532 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270529 +++$+++ 270531 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.248548640E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure it needs to be withdrawn. I tried to fix the specific points the opposer brought up.  And I plan to go through it again today. It would be good to get more feedback. I asked Philcha for an opinion, but he is too busy right now. If you do want to withdraw it, you can just post on the FAC page that you want to do so. Also, you can notify [[User:SandyGeorgia]]. It will withdrawn upon request.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::: I'm not sure it needs to be withdrawn. I tried to fix the specific points the opposer brought up.  And I plan to go through it again today. It would be good to get more feedback. I asked Philcha for an opinion, but he is too busy right now. If you do want to withdraw it, you can just post on the FAC page that you want to do so. Also, you can notify [[User:SandyGeorgia]]. It will withdrawn upon request.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
270533 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270529 +++$+++ 270532 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.248549600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that clarification. I'll return to it later today with a particular aim of tightening the focus. . .  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for that clarification. I'll return to it later today with a particular aim of tightening the focus. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 12:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

8389 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-30 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.243732680E09 +++$+++ could you protect the [[Mariah Carey discography]] article as you did today to few of her albums pages? The reason is the same as was on the Mariah Carey mess discussion. The site is vandalised every day by two sockpuppets {{userlinks|Petergriffin9901}} (see also [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations\/Petergriffin9901\/Archive]]) and {{userlinks|JuStar}} (see also [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations\/JuStar\/Archive]]).  +++$+++ could you protect the [[Mariah Carey discography]] article as you did today to few of her albums pages? The reason is the same as was on the Mariah Carey mess discussion. The site is vandalised every day by two sockpuppets {{userlinks|Petergriffin9901}} (see also [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Petergriffin9901/Archive]]) and {{userlinks|JuStar}} (see also [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations/JuStar/Archive]]). [[User:Max24|Max24]] ([[User talk:Max24|Max24]]) 18:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
8390 +++$+++ Firsfron +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8389 +++$+++ 8389 +++$+++ 2009-05-30 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.243741620E09 +++$+++ Done. I've also left a more detailed message on [[WP:AN\/I]]. Thanks for your efforts on cleaning up these articles. <font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ :Done. I've also left a more detailed message on [[WP:AN/I]]. Thanks for your efforts on cleaning up these articles. <font color="#0000FF">[[User:Firsfron|Firsfron of Ronchester]]</font> 20:47, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
8391 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8389 +++$+++ 8390 +++$+++ 2009-05-30 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.243747620E09 +++$+++ If you aren't sure how to request changes to fully-protected articles, let me know, and I'll help with the mechanics.&mdash; +++$+++ ::If you aren't sure how to request changes to fully-protected articles, let me know, and I'll help with the mechanics.&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 22:27, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
8392 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8389 +++$+++ 8391 +++$+++ 2009-06-21 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.245627540E09 +++$+++ I've created a sandbox copy at [[User:Max24\/Mariah Carey discography]]. Edit it there, and make your changes. When you are done, let me know, and I'll review them and take it from there if I agree with your changes.&mdash; +++$+++ :::I've created a sandbox copy at [[User:Max24/Mariah Carey discography]]. Edit it there, and make your changes. When you are done, let me know, and I'll review them and take it from there if I agree with your changes.&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 16:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
8393 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8389 +++$+++ 8392 +++$+++ 2009-06-23 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.245741900E09 +++$+++ I'll get it reviewed in the next day.&mdash; +++$+++ ::::I'll get it reviewed in the next day.&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 00:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
8394 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8389 +++$+++ 8393 +++$+++ 2009-06-23 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.245751020E09 +++$+++ Your changes have been promoted. Please place the text <nowiki>{{db-author}}<\/nowiki> at the front of the sandbox copy. That will show that you are done with it, and an admin will delete it. There's no reason to keep extra copies around.&mdash; +++$+++ :::::Your changes have been promoted. Please place the text <nowiki>{{db-author}}</nowiki> at the front of the sandbox copy. That will show that you are done with it, and an admin will delete it. There's no reason to keep extra copies around.&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 02:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

270534 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-27 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.248737700E09 +++$+++ <ri> At FAC, Philcha has questioned the paragraph \"Darwin began to include women who were botany enthusiasts in his correspondence. As a popular and acceptable activity, botany had been taken up by many middle class ladies. On the recommendation of John Lindley, Darwin wrote to Lady Dorothy Nevill who responded generously by sending numerous exotic orchids, and requested a signed photograph of him to hang up in her sitting room next to portraits of her notable friends including Hooker.\" My feeling is that the general issue is valid, the last bit \"and requested a signed photograph of him to hang up in her sitting room next to portraits of her notable friends including Hooker\" is amusing and biographically of interest, but a bit offtopic and could be deleted. What think you? .   +++$+++ <ri> At FAC, Philcha has questioned the paragraph "Darwin began to include women who were botany enthusiasts in his correspondence. As a popular and acceptable activity, botany had been taken up by many middle class ladies. On the recommendation of John Lindley, Darwin wrote to Lady Dorothy Nevill who responded generously by sending numerous exotic orchids, and requested a signed photograph of him to hang up in her sitting room next to portraits of her notable friends including Hooker." My feeling is that the general issue is valid, the last bit "and requested a signed photograph of him to hang up in her sitting room next to portraits of her notable friends including Hooker" is amusing and biographically of interest, but a bit offtopic and could be deleted. What think you? .  [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 16:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
270535 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.248738540E09 +++$+++ In the lede you talk of the  \"vogue at the time for growing exotic orchids.\" You also say his field work  \"developed into enjoyable and challenging experiments, aided by his family, village friends and a widening circle of correspondents across Britain and worldwide.\" To me the Lady Dorothy Nevill material is an example of these statements. Just the sort of vogue upper crust Victorian ladies would enjoy, plus it shows the breath of those who contributed. This collaboration of Darwin with so many is one of his charms. That is the way I took it. I don't see it as a sop thrown to feminists. It has never been denied there were educated Victorian ladies. Plus I do disagree with some of his other nitpicks, perhaps because I have looked at the references you supply.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :In the lede you talk of the  "vogue at the time for growing exotic orchids." You also say his field work  "developed into enjoyable and challenging experiments, aided by his family, village friends and a widening circle of correspondents across Britain and worldwide." To me the Lady Dorothy Nevill material is an example of these statements. Just the sort of vogue upper crust Victorian ladies would enjoy, plus it shows the breath of those who contributed. This collaboration of Darwin with so many is one of his charms. That is the way I took it. I don't see it as a sop thrown to feminists. It has never been denied there were educated Victorian ladies. Plus I do disagree with some of his other nitpicks, perhaps because I have looked at the references you supply.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
270536 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270535 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.248741660E09 +++$+++ Thanks, will leave the photo bit in for now. Please don't hesitate to make it clear where you think that I'm going too far in conceding changes to meet nitpicks. Any such advice is greatly welcomed. . .  +++$+++ ::Thanks, will leave the photo bit in for now. Please don't hesitate to make it clear where you think that I'm going too far in conceding changes to meet nitpicks. Any such advice is greatly welcomed. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
270537 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270536 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.248846780E09 +++$+++ Having had some discussion with Philcha on my talk page, I've tried trimming down the family detail and some other aspects in my sandbox.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User%3ADave_souza%2FSandbox%2FFertilisation_of_Orchids&diff=304766723&oldid=304707834] I'd appreciate it if you could have a look, some of it's through gritted teeth but I'm inclined to implement these changes, including losing the bit about Lady Nevill asking for Darwin's photo!  If you think other bits should be deleted, please say. Thanks for all your help,  +++$+++ :::Having had some discussion with Philcha on my talk page, I've tried trimming down the family detail and some other aspects in my sandbox.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ADave_souza%2FSandbox%2FFertilisation_of_Orchids&diff=304766723&oldid=304707834] I'd appreciate it if you could have a look, some of it's through gritted teeth but I'm inclined to implement these changes, including losing the bit about Lady Nevill asking for Darwin's photo!  If you think other bits should be deleted, please say. Thanks for all your help, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
270538 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270537 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.248847920E09 +++$+++ I do not like the changes. It takes all the charm and drama out of the article. I guess this article is supposed to be dry and encyclopedia, but for me it is too painful to see the changes. The best I can do is not look at the article, as what I see I do not like. Maybe it is better to have the article fail. In fact, I may withdraw my support the way things are going. Put the article out of its misery. Sorry that I am feeling so emotion, but I did very much like the original article. Is getting an FA woth it? Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I do not like the changes. It takes all the charm and drama out of the article. I guess this article is supposed to be dry and encyclopedia, but for me it is too painful to see the changes. The best I can do is not look at the article, as what I see I do not like. Maybe it is better to have the article fail. In fact, I may withdraw my support the way things are going. Put the article out of its misery. Sorry that I am feeling so emotion, but I did very much like the original article. Is getting an FA woth it? Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
270539 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.248886800E09 +++$+++ Sorry that by posting rather late at night I've given the wrong impression, I was asking your opinion before going further, and will not make the changes. Individual aspects can be discussed, but as you say it's important to try to keep the qualities of the original. I'll try looking back to the version where you gave your support, and will compare it to the current version to try to find exactly where quality is being lost. The sandbox proposals were actually pretty minor, but as you say these things can chip away at the original quality of writing. Will think it over for a while now. .  +++$+++ ::::::Sorry that by posting rather late at night I've given the wrong impression, I was asking your opinion before going further, and will not make the changes. Individual aspects can be discussed, but as you say it's important to try to keep the qualities of the original. I'll try looking back to the version where you gave your support, and will compare it to the current version to try to find exactly where quality is being lost. The sandbox proposals were actually pretty minor, but as you say these things can chip away at the original quality of writing. Will think it over for a while now. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 10:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270540 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270538 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.248852240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know I was wasting my time. I thought it was quite a nice article, and with a bit of tidying up and clarification on a coule of points I'd have been prepared to support it. But if it's liable to be overwritten from an editor's sandbox then it can hardly be considered stable. -- +++$+++ :::::Thanks for letting me know I was wasting my time. I thought it was quite a nice article, and with a bit of tidying up and clarification on a coule of points I'd have been prepared to support it. But if it's liable to be overwritten from an editor's sandbox then it can hardly be considered stable. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 00:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270541 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270540 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.248886800E09 +++$+++ Have responded in detail on your talk page, your changes seemed to me to be improvements and would not be discarded even if the sandbox proposals were implemented. .  +++$+++ ::::::Have responded in detail on your talk page, your changes seemed to me to be improvements and would not be discarded even if the sandbox proposals were implemented. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 10:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270542 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270535 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.248871020E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, if you dislike the direction the FA review is taking you should speak out there, explaining in detail why you think it's going wrong. You too, Malleus. If you think the problems you find are caused by my comments, say which and why. Sure, I'll argue my case, but I'll play fair - I know I'm not infallible. -- +++$+++ ::Mattisse, if you dislike the direction the FA review is taking you should speak out there, explaining in detail why you think it's going wrong. You too, Malleus. If you think the problems you find are caused by my comments, say which and why. Sure, I'll argue my case, but I'll play fair - I know I'm not infallible. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 05:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270543 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270535 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.248872280E09 +++$+++ PS re Lady Dorothy Nevill, I'd be inclined to put the item about the signed photo in the bio article [[Charles Darwin]], where the idea of his being a \"pop star\" would be amusing. In ''[[Fertilisation of Orchids]]'' I'd consider changing \"His requests to the wealthy enthusiasts who had taken up the fashionable pursuit of growing rare orchids brought large numbers of specimens\" to e.g. \"He obtained many specimens from wealthy enthusiasts who had taken up the fashionable pursuit of growing rare orchids &nbsp;\u2013 including [[Lady Dorothy Nevill]] and other ladies of high-status, for whom this was one of the few hobbies considered respectable\" as a sly dig at Victorian restrictions on women.\" I'm all for including a little humour and colour into science related articles, provided it does not distract from the science. -- +++$+++ ::PS re Lady Dorothy Nevill, I'd be inclined to put the item about the signed photo in the bio article [[Charles Darwin]], where the idea of his being a "pop star" would be amusing. In ''[[Fertilisation of Orchids]]'' I'd consider changing "His requests to the wealthy enthusiasts who had taken up the fashionable pursuit of growing rare orchids brought large numbers of specimens" to e.g. "He obtained many specimens from wealthy enthusiasts who had taken up the fashionable pursuit of growing rare orchids &nbsp;– including [[Lady Dorothy Nevill]] and other ladies of high-status, for whom this was one of the few hobbies considered respectable" as a sly dig at Victorian restrictions on women." I'm all for including a little humour and colour into science related articles, provided it does not distract from the science. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 05:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270544 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270535 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.248892740E09 +++$+++ Please come back to the FAC - given what I've seen, you'll probably disagree strongly - but I won't complain, I'll be glad to see you stand up for what you believe in a firm, level-headed way. -- +++$+++ ::Please come back to the FAC - given what I've seen, you'll probably disagree strongly - but I won't complain, I'll be glad to see you stand up for what you believe in a firm, level-headed way. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 11:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270545 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270544 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.248894300E09 +++$+++ Now I don't want to fall out with anyone, but thinking it over, the half sentence on Lady Nevill says a lot about the circles Darwin was getting his plants from, and is worth keeping. Also, am unhappy with moving the \"Botany as recreation\" heading, though I appreciate the intention. Have tried looking over the version [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fertilisation_of_Orchids&oldid=301452766 as of 10 July] and the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fertilisation_of_Orchids&oldid=304780043 current version], and the first thing that struck me is that the background section is now much more clumsy, if also much more informative. As an experiment, not to be just pasted over anyone else's improvements, I've tried reintegrating it with the \"Insect fertilisation of plants\" section, and restoring the Downe house \/ Orchis Bank connection which had been lost by digressing into Sprengel.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Dave_souza\/Sandbox\/Fertilisation_of_Orchids_quality_restoration#Insect_fertilisation_of_plants]  That seems to me to restore a bit of the old quality, comments welcome. Will review other sections when time permits. .  +++$+++ :::Now I don't want to fall out with anyone, but thinking it over, the half sentence on Lady Nevill says a lot about the circles Darwin was getting his plants from, and is worth keeping. Also, am unhappy with moving the "Botany as recreation" heading, though I appreciate the intention. Have tried looking over the version [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fertilisation_of_Orchids&oldid=301452766 as of 10 July] and the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fertilisation_of_Orchids&oldid=304780043 current version], and the first thing that struck me is that the background section is now much more clumsy, if also much more informative. As an experiment, not to be just pasted over anyone else's improvements, I've tried reintegrating it with the "Insect fertilisation of plants" section, and restoring the Downe house / Orchis Bank connection which had been lost by digressing into Sprengel.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dave_souza/Sandbox/Fertilisation_of_Orchids_quality_restoration#Insect_fertilisation_of_plants]  That seems to me to restore a bit of the old quality, comments welcome. Will review other sections when time permits. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 12:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270546 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270545 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.248899340E09 +++$+++ Remember, those of us who supported the article supported it as it was then, not necessarily as it is now.    Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Remember, those of us who supported the article supported it as it was then, not necessarily as it is now.    Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270547 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270546 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.248903180E09 +++$+++ Your account of the difference of opinion that Philcha and I had over the [[Manchester Mark I]]'s GA doesn't quite tally with my own recollection Mattisse. I didn't \"withdraw\", I simply refused to make some of the changes suggested, and encouraged him to fail the article so that I could take it to GAR, for other opinions. At no point did Philcha and I fall out over the review, we simply disagreed, and I dare say we still disagree over exactly the same points. FAC is different though, in that there are always other opinions, and sometimes they conflict. The trick is to bend with them as far as is reasonable, like a tree in the wind, not to break under a light summer breeze. It's obvious to me that a lot of good work's been done on this article, and that it's very close to meeting the FA criteria. Seems a shame to withdraw at this late stage when just one final push is needed. If you object to some of the changes thast Philcha or anyone else has proposed (I haven't made up my mind yet), then the prope thing to do is to argue your corner, as I did at that GAR. If you're right, then it will be obvious to at least most people. I would encourage you to strike your opposition and to fight for what you believe the article should be. It's quite possible to do that without any ill will or rancour; even though I haven't always agreed with him I have the greatest respect for the work Philcha does, and the fact that the bastard failed one of my GAs didn't alter that one little bit. :-) Walking away when things get tough isn't always the answer. -- +++$+++ :::::Your account of the difference of opinion that Philcha and I had over the [[Manchester Mark I]]'s GA doesn't quite tally with my own recollection Mattisse. I didn't "withdraw", I simply refused to make some of the changes suggested, and encouraged him to fail the article so that I could take it to GAR, for other opinions. At no point did Philcha and I fall out over the review, we simply disagreed, and I dare say we still disagree over exactly the same points. FAC is different though, in that there are always other opinions, and sometimes they conflict. The trick is to bend with them as far as is reasonable, like a tree in the wind, not to break under a light summer breeze. It's obvious to me that a lot of good work's been done on this article, and that it's very close to meeting the FA criteria. Seems a shame to withdraw at this late stage when just one final push is needed. If you object to some of the changes thast Philcha or anyone else has proposed (I haven't made up my mind yet), then the prope thing to do is to argue your corner, as I did at that GAR. If you're right, then it will be obvious to at least most people. I would encourage you to strike your opposition and to fight for what you believe the article should be. It's quite possible to do that without any ill will or rancour; even though I haven't always agreed with him I have the greatest respect for the work Philcha does, and the fact that the bastard failed one of my GAs didn't alter that one little bit. :-) Walking away when things get tough isn't always the answer. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 14:33, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270548 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270547 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.248904260E09 +++$+++ I did not mean you did \"withdraw\" in a formal sense. I meant that you stopped complying with his requests, in effect withdrawing, knowing it meant the article would fail GA. That is the choice Dave has here with ''Orchids''. Have you looked at the FAC page and the long, and lengthening lists of requests? I have presented my case to Dave by posts and emails. As you know, I cannot comment, as in \"presenting my case\" on FAC pages, as my doing so in the [[Major depressive disorder]] is one of the main reasons I ended up in arbitration. So I cannot \"argue\" as you did, nor \"fight for what [I] believe the article should be.\" You are allowed latitude; I am not. My only option, per My Plan, is to withdraw. I have put too much into the article[http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&page=Fertilisation+of+Orchids&since=&until=&grouped=on&hideminor=on&order=-edit_count&max=100&order=-edit_count&format=html] It is painful to see the beauty and charm of the article destroyed.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::I did not mean you did "withdraw" in a formal sense. I meant that you stopped complying with his requests, in effect withdrawing, knowing it meant the article would fail GA. That is the choice Dave has here with ''Orchids''. Have you looked at the FAC page and the long, and lengthening lists of requests? I have presented my case to Dave by posts and emails. As you know, I cannot comment, as in "presenting my case" on FAC pages, as my doing so in the [[Major depressive disorder]] is one of the main reasons I ended up in arbitration. So I cannot "argue" as you did, nor "fight for what [I] believe the article should be." You are allowed latitude; I am not. My only option, per My Plan, is to withdraw. I have put too much into the article[http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&page=Fertilisation+of+Orchids&since=&until=&grouped=on&hideminor=on&order=-edit_count&max=100&order=-edit_count&format=html] It is painful to see the beauty and charm of the article destroyed.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270549 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270548 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.248910080E09 +++$+++ Malleus has stated the case perfectly, as usual. If your plan winds up making you a doormat, it's failed, because you will become angry and depressed - I know I would if I tried to be a doormat - and then either you will withdraw from WP or you will explode. Your \"opponent\" (me) in this case is also your friend and one of your mentors, so if you do go too far I won't make a huge fuss - I'd just leave a message on your Talk page, e.g. \"you might want to rephrase that\". What better situation to practise the skills you need to develop? C'mon, let's have fun - I just realised that's the point: treat it as a word game, not as life or death. -- +++$+++ :::::::Malleus has stated the case perfectly, as usual. If your plan winds up making you a doormat, it's failed, because you will become angry and depressed - I know I would if I tried to be a doormat - and then either you will withdraw from WP or you will explode. Your "opponent" (me) in this case is also your friend and one of your mentors, so if you do go too far I won't make a huge fuss - I'd just leave a message on your Talk page, e.g. "you might want to rephrase that". What better situation to practise the skills you need to develop? C'mon, let's have fun - I just realised that's the point: treat it as a word game, not as life or death. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 16:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270550 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ 270548 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.248912900E09 +++$+++ I had a quick look through last night, and I think it's a great little article, so why don't we all try and work together to see it home? I haven't fully formed my opinion on the article yet, or some of the proposed changes, but when I do I won't be shy about presenting my opinion. This growing series on Darwin is important addition to the encyclopedia, and one worth a little bit of effort to get right. It's perfectly possible to disagree with another editor, even strongly, without that developing into rancour so long as the focus is maintained on the article, not the editor; things start to get nasty when the comments become personal. The purpose of your plan was to help you to spot and deal with situations which were becoming stressful to you, and do avoid the descent into personal remarks. If you've reached the point where you feel unable to continue the discussion at FAC without that risk, then of course it is better that you take no further part. Best of all though would be to argue your case clearly and rationally and, if you're right, win Philcha round. -- +++$+++ :::::::I had a quick look through last night, and I think it's a great little article, so why don't we all try and work together to see it home? I haven't fully formed my opinion on the article yet, or some of the proposed changes, but when I do I won't be shy about presenting my opinion. This growing series on Darwin is important addition to the encyclopedia, and one worth a little bit of effort to get right. It's perfectly possible to disagree with another editor, even strongly, without that developing into rancour so long as the focus is maintained on the article, not the editor; things start to get nasty when the comments become personal. The purpose of your plan was to help you to spot and deal with situations which were becoming stressful to you, and do avoid the descent into personal remarks. If you've reached the point where you feel unable to continue the discussion at FAC without that risk, then of course it is better that you take no further part. Best of all though would be to argue your case clearly and rationally and, if you're right, win Philcha round. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 17:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270551 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.248923700E09 +++$+++ I quite like the article largely as it is. As I said last night, to me it just needs a bit of tidying up here and there, so I've no intention of making any sweeping demands of Dave. -- +++$+++ :::::::::I quite like the article largely as it is. As I said last night, to me it just needs a bit of tidying up here and there, so I've no intention of making any sweeping demands of Dave. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 20:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270552 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270534 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.248919320E09 +++$+++ I have expressed myself already regarding what I considered the charm and the beauty of the article on the FAC page. The richness of the imagery in conveying Darwin's thinking and writing processes and the life around him that contributed to the work are the very things being purged from the article.   Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::I have expressed myself already regarding what I considered the charm and the beauty of the article on the FAC page. The richness of the imagery in conveying Darwin's thinking and writing processes and the life around him that contributed to the work are the very things being purged from the article.   Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

532683 +++$+++ Knverma +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-09 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.168375800E09 +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Bill_Britt}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Bill_Britt]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.  +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Bill_Britt}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Bill_Britt]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:Knverma|Knverma]] 12:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
532684 +++$+++ Knverma +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532683 +++$+++ 532683 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.168380780E09 +++$+++ The Brulington Times-News link above was wrong. Here it is: http:\/\/www.amquix.info\/britt_separation.html --  +++$+++ * The Brulington Times-News link above was wrong. Here it is: http://www.amquix.info/britt_separation.html -- [[User:Knverma|Knverma]] 14:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

8397 +++$+++ Imperatore +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-20 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.248130440E09 +++$+++ I have reworked Celine Dion's infobox labels entry so that it can be more precise\/historically significant- also meeting wp:albums guidelines for labels. Please provide me some input.   +++$+++ I have reworked Celine Dion's infobox labels entry so that it can be more precise/historically significant- also meeting wp:albums guidelines for labels. Please provide me some input.  [[User:Imperatore|Imperatore]] ([[User talk:Imperatore|talk]]) 15:54, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
8398 +++$+++ Imperatore +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8397 +++$+++ 8397 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.249602060E09 +++$+++ To this day with the latest release, taking chances, the owner\/copyright holder of all of Celine's discography is Sony Music Canada- (P) and (C), even though epic and now columbia in NYC is where she is signed to produce recordings. For now, Celine's infobox says \"CBS Records Canada (1986\u20131990)\", but since her discography owner\/copyright holder is still Sony Canada, should I change this to Sony Music Canada (1986-present)?  +++$+++ :To this day with the latest release, taking chances, the owner/copyright holder of all of Celine's discography is Sony Music Canada- (P) and (C), even though epic and now columbia in NYC is where she is signed to produce recordings. For now, Celine's infobox says "CBS Records Canada (1986–1990)", but since her discography owner/copyright holder is still Sony Canada, should I change this to Sony Music Canada (1986-present)? [[User:Imperatore|Imperatore]] ([[User talk:Imperatore|talk]]) 16:41, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

532687 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532687 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.168557780E09 +++$+++ You might be just the person I need- [[Indigenous Australians]] has just been repeatedly vandalised and with ? German - in there - wonder what you would do with the vandal?   +++$+++ You might be just the person I need- [[Indigenous Australians]] has just been repeatedly vandalised and with ? German - in there - wonder what you would do with the vandal?  [[User talk:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 15:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
532688 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532687 +++$+++ 532687 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.168557900E09 +++$+++ For now, I have left a note on the vandal's page. If you see he continue to vandalize the article, let me kno wand I will block him. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : For now, I have left a note on the vandal's page. If you see he continue to vandalize the article, let me kno wand I will block him. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 15:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
532689 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532687 +++$+++ 532688 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.168558080E09 +++$+++ OK - I've alerted another admin here in Perth - WA - its after midnight here :) so at least we are watching. Thank you for your help - it is appreciated!  +++$+++ ::OK - I've alerted another admin here in Perth - WA - its after midnight here :) so at least we are watching. Thank you for your help - it is appreciated! [[User talk:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 15:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

532690 +++$+++ FrankWilliams +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.168559100E09 +++$+++ I see you've reverted back edits by [[70.128.117.245]] on the [[Jeet Kune Do]] article.  If you look he's real close to violating the [[WP:3RR|Three Revert Rule]].  Any chance of you blocking him as he's really creating a lot of commotion and unnecessary grief?  Thanks  +++$+++ I see you've reverted back edits by [[70.128.117.245]] on the [[Jeet Kune Do]] article.  If you look he's real close to violating the [[WP:3RR|Three Revert Rule]].  Any chance of you blocking him as he's really creating a lot of commotion and unnecessary grief?  Thanks [[User:FrankWilliams|FrankWilliams]] 15:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
532691 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532690 +++$+++ 532690 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.168559280E09 +++$+++ Indeed. Well, since noone told him anything yet, I left him a notice for now. But if he continues, tell me and I will block him. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Indeed. Well, since noone told him anything yet, I left him a notice for now. But if he continues, tell me and I will block him. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 15:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

8403 +++$+++ Decltype +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8403 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-12 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.250106240E09 +++$+++ Hi Max24! I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on [[I Surrender (Celione Dion song)]]- because: '''I realize you are an expert on the subject, and would know whether the single is notable or not. However, speedy deletion [[WP:CSD#A9|criterion A9]] is not for singles by a notable artist.''' If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. <tt> +++$+++ Hi Max24! I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on [[I Surrender (Celione Dion song)]]- because: '''I realize you are an expert on the subject, and would know whether the single is notable or not. However, speedy deletion [[WP:CSD#A9|criterion A9]] is not for singles by a notable artist.''' If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. <tt>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</tt> ([[User talk:Decltype|talk]]) 12:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
8404 +++$+++ Decltype +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8403 +++$+++ 8403 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.250106600E09 +++$+++ After having redirected the song to the album, I realized that the title was misspelled. As such, it was useless as a redirect, and I deleted it anyway. Regards, <tt> +++$+++ :After having redirected the song to the album, I realized that the title was misspelled. As such, it was useless as a redirect, and I deleted it anyway. Regards, <tt>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</tt> ([[User talk:Decltype|talk]]) 12:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

532692 +++$+++ FrankWilliams +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.168559700E09 +++$+++ Tone he just changed your edit and I reverted back.  Do what you have to do.  Thanks  +++$+++ Tone he just changed your edit and I reverted back.  Do what you have to do.  Thanks [[User:FrankWilliams|FrankWilliams]] 15:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
532693 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532692 +++$+++ 532692 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.168559820E09 +++$+++ Now I let him the notice about 3RR. The next violation results in a block. By the way, you can also remind the user next time yourself ;-) --''' +++$+++ : Now I let him the notice about 3RR. The next violation results in a block. By the way, you can also remind the user next time yourself ;-) --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 15:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

613070 +++$+++ Pencefn +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-08 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.207703700E09 +++$+++ Dave - Has arrived today as {{user5|1=Filafirerap}} -- +++$+++ Dave - Has arrived today as {{user5|1=Filafirerap}} --[[User:Pencefn|Stewart]]<small><font color="maroon"><sup> '''[[User talk:Pencefn#top|(talk)]]'''</sup></font></small> 18:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
613071 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613070 +++$+++ 613070 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.207709580E09 +++$+++ Convincing, blocked as sock. Thanks, ..  +++$+++ :Convincing, blocked as sock. Thanks, .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

8407 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-12 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.255335120E09 +++$+++ Hey Max, why dont you express your opinion here with regards to our freind Kww. He has helped us both with many issues, so I think we should show our support.-- +++$+++ Hey Max, why dont you express your opinion here with regards to our freind Kww. He has helped us both with many issues, so I think we should show our support.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|Petergriffin9901]] ([[User talk:Petergriffin9901|talk]]) 01:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
8408 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8407 +++$+++ 8407 +++$+++ 2009-10-20 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.256089380E09 +++$+++ &mdash; +++$+++ :&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 18:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

270553 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270553 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-29 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.248925560E09 +++$+++ <reduce indent> Sorry I've been out most of today, my feeling is that both Mattisse and Philcha are right: the concerns about the imagery are very important, and all of the relevant text has been left in place, but as I suggested in my last draft proposal the insertion of other material in between the move to Down House and the description of Orchis Bank weakened the force of that section. Which is why I've suggested restoring the original order, without deleting any of the text in that section. In addition there could be merit in trimming the recently inserted \"Background\" about the earlier life of Darwin, and merging it into the insect fertilisation section. In other sections more information has been added clarifying aspects of the imagery, I don't think it looks too bad but will gladly discuss any improvements. What was the \"Influence\" section has been greatly expanded and reorganised, and in my opinion Philcha has been very right to look for more information and clarification both of the scientific implications of the work and of its influence. The Asa Gray quote wasn't in the original, so there should not be a problem with trimming or deleting it. The greenhouses section wasn't in the original: it adds more about Darwin's home life, but could be transferred to a Darwin biography page and trimmed a bit without losing much. I appreciate that it's very easy for changes to blunt or lose the quality of language, and there's a tension between improving the coverage of the article and maintaining its freshness. Any guidance you can give on this tricky balance is very much appreciated. p.s. we did remove \"larks abound there\" etc. from the Down House description, it did seem a bit off topic.  +++$+++ <reduce indent> Sorry I've been out most of today, my feeling is that both Mattisse and Philcha are right: the concerns about the imagery are very important, and all of the relevant text has been left in place, but as I suggested in my last draft proposal the insertion of other material in between the move to Down House and the description of Orchis Bank weakened the force of that section. Which is why I've suggested restoring the original order, without deleting any of the text in that section. In addition there could be merit in trimming the recently inserted "Background" about the earlier life of Darwin, and merging it into the insect fertilisation section. In other sections more information has been added clarifying aspects of the imagery, I don't think it looks too bad but will gladly discuss any improvements. What was the "Influence" section has been greatly expanded and reorganised, and in my opinion Philcha has been very right to look for more information and clarification both of the scientific implications of the work and of its influence. The Asa Gray quote wasn't in the original, so there should not be a problem with trimming or deleting it. The greenhouses section wasn't in the original: it adds more about Darwin's home life, but could be transferred to a Darwin biography page and trimmed a bit without losing much. I appreciate that it's very easy for changes to blunt or lose the quality of language, and there's a tension between improving the coverage of the article and maintaining its freshness. Any guidance you can give on this tricky balance is very much appreciated. p.s. we did remove "larks abound there" etc. from the Down House description, it did seem a bit off topic. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270554 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270553 +++$+++ 270553 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.248925860E09 +++$+++ Just one outstanding issue from my point of view Dave; which version ought I to be looking at? I really do want to make my mind up after having read through the version that's at FAC, whichever one that's going to be. -- +++$+++ :Just one outstanding issue from my point of view Dave; which version ought I to be looking at? I really do want to make my mind up after having read through the version that's at FAC, whichever one that's going to be. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 20:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270555 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270553 +++$+++ 270554 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.248926760E09 +++$+++ I have no objection to the inclusion of more information of the scientific implications\/influence etc. of his work. I do think that the information about his environment and the way a hobby expanded into a major contribution to his theory of evolution shows how science evolves from everyday experience and not just a great mind contemplating in a room. This process is particularly integrated in Darwin's descriptions. I also think the article could be more specific in explaining his thinking in a way the general reader can understand. This book contained crucial and fundamental findings. As far as what you are proposing above, I have not been able to keep up with all the changes, so I don't know at this point what is in the article.&mdash; +++$+++ ::I have no objection to the inclusion of more information of the scientific implications/influence etc. of his work. I do think that the information about his environment and the way a hobby expanded into a major contribution to his theory of evolution shows how science evolves from everyday experience and not just a great mind contemplating in a room. This process is particularly integrated in Darwin's descriptions. I also think the article could be more specific in explaining his thinking in a way the general reader can understand. This book contained crucial and fundamental findings. As far as what you are proposing above, I have not been able to keep up with all the changes, so I don't know at this point what is in the article.&mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270556 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270553 +++$+++ 270555 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.248932460E09 +++$+++ I've avoided making any changes lately, and don't want to do anything drastic without agreement here. The proposals I'm making are purely illustrations, and any edits to the main article will be done in place to keep any useful changes, not pasted in from my rough draft. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Dave_souza\/Sandbox\/Fertilisation_of_Orchids_quality_restoration&diff=304863980&oldid=304863270#Insect_fertilisation_of_plants This idea] involves two changes: the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Dave_souza\/Sandbox\/Fertilisation_of_Orchids_quality_restoration&diff=304863270&oldid=304861239 less important one] involves shrinking the pre-orchids biography and integrating it into the \"insect fertilisation\" section, the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Dave_souza\/Sandbox\/Fertilisation_of_Orchids_quality_restoration&diff=304863980&oldid=304863270 more useful possibility], in my opinion, moves the \"orchis bank\" information back into a paragraph with the move to Down House, as it was originally, and makes the Sprengel information into a separate paragraph. I think that makes a more vivid picture of the family life at Downe, but will leave it unless you agree. Something Philcha suggested, which seems worthwhile to me, is to either [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Dave_souza\/Sandbox\/Fertilisation_of_Orchids&diff=304714172&oldid=304713361 trim and integrate Asa Gray's quote] in the Reception section, or delete it altogether. The Thompson source will allow slight expansion of the influence on biology, as has been requested at FAC, so that's something I've still to tackle. Hope that change is OK with everyone. So, won't do any more tonight, will see what comments anyone has on these ideas. Thanks for your patience. . .  +++$+++ :::I've avoided making any changes lately, and don't want to do anything drastic without agreement here. The proposals I'm making are purely illustrations, and any edits to the main article will be done in place to keep any useful changes, not pasted in from my rough draft. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dave_souza/Sandbox/Fertilisation_of_Orchids_quality_restoration&diff=304863980&oldid=304863270#Insect_fertilisation_of_plants This idea] involves two changes: the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dave_souza/Sandbox/Fertilisation_of_Orchids_quality_restoration&diff=304863270&oldid=304861239 less important one] involves shrinking the pre-orchids biography and integrating it into the "insect fertilisation" section, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dave_souza/Sandbox/Fertilisation_of_Orchids_quality_restoration&diff=304863980&oldid=304863270 more useful possibility], in my opinion, moves the "orchis bank" information back into a paragraph with the move to Down House, as it was originally, and makes the Sprengel information into a separate paragraph. I think that makes a more vivid picture of the family life at Downe, but will leave it unless you agree. Something Philcha suggested, which seems worthwhile to me, is to either [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dave_souza/Sandbox/Fertilisation_of_Orchids&diff=304714172&oldid=304713361 trim and integrate Asa Gray's quote] in the Reception section, or delete it altogether. The Thompson source will allow slight expansion of the influence on biology, as has been requested at FAC, so that's something I've still to tackle. Hope that change is OK with everyone. So, won't do any more tonight, will see what comments anyone has on these ideas. Thanks for your patience. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270557 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270553 +++$+++ 270556 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.248932940E09 +++$+++ I have made some improvements (in my opinion) in the sections you are thinking of moving and changing, which I hope you will consider and not just overwrite, as I removed redundant wording, added wikilinks etc. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I have made some improvements (in my opinion) in the sections you are thinking of moving and changing, which I hope you will consider and not just overwrite, as I removed redundant wording, added wikilinks etc. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
270558 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270553 +++$+++ 270557 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.248933540E09 +++$+++ Yes, I've considered them, they look good to me and won't just be overwritten. The possible change to integrate the \"background\" biography into the \"insect fertilisation\" section is aimed at meeting your concern about the writing quality, if you don't like it then I'm glad to leave it alone: the reuniting of the move to Downe with Orchis Bank is purely a move of paragraphs, and your latest wording would be kept. That's the one I think more significant for writing quality, again if you'd rather leave it as it is, no problem. . .  +++$+++ :::::Yes, I've considered them, they look good to me and won't just be overwritten. The possible change to integrate the "background" biography into the "insect fertilisation" section is aimed at meeting your concern about the writing quality, if you don't like it then I'm glad to leave it alone: the reuniting of the move to Downe with Orchis Bank is purely a move of paragraphs, and your latest wording would be kept. That's the one I think more significant for writing quality, again if you'd rather leave it as it is, no problem. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

532699 +++$+++ Tango +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.168650780E09 +++$+++ Hi! Could you explain this edit: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=100250555&oldid=100250292]? It seems you blocked another IP for 24 hours a few minutes before, but the IP your comment is under has not been blocked... -- +++$+++ Hi! Could you explain this edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=100250555&oldid=100250292]? It seems you blocked another IP for 24 hours a few minutes before, but the IP your comment is under has not been blocked... --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 17:13, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
532700 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532699 +++$+++ 532699 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.168650900E09 +++$+++ Funny, probably it's because another admin blocked him at the same time. He's blocked now anyway. --''' +++$+++ : Funny, probably it's because another admin blocked him at the same time. He's blocked now anyway. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 17:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
532701 +++$+++ Tango +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532699 +++$+++ 532699 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.168651200E09 +++$+++ He hadn't been blocked when I looked at the log. He wasn't blocked until 5 minutes after you left that message. Strange... You don't need to leave a comment when you've blocked a user, anyway, you can just remove them (or these days, leave it and a bot will remove them). -- +++$+++ :He hadn't been blocked when I looked at the log. He wasn't blocked until 5 minutes after you left that message. Strange... You don't need to leave a comment when you've blocked a user, anyway, you can just remove them (or these days, leave it and a bot will remove them). --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 17:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

532702 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.168664640E09 +++$+++ Hi.  You blocked [[User:Thwrebvebthwr]] for vandalism.  Most of his vandalism has been reverted; but he uploaded a clearly-unfree image, [[:Image:Patrick Swayze.jpg]], with no fair-use rational which he used in his vandalism.  He also created a userpage for a user that did not have one [[User:Dstumme]].  Those probably ought to be deleted.  Thanks.  ~ '' +++$+++ Hi.  You blocked [[User:Thwrebvebthwr]] for vandalism.  Most of his vandalism has been reverted; but he uploaded a clearly-unfree image, [[:Image:Patrick Swayze.jpg]], with no fair-use rational which he used in his vandalism.  He also created a userpage for a user that did not have one [[User:Dstumme]].  Those probably ought to be deleted.  Thanks.  ~ ''[[User:ONUnicorn|<span style="color:#0cc">ONUnicorn</span>]]''<sup>([[User talk:ONUnicorn|Talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/ONUnicorn|Contribs]])</sup><small>[[WP:P&amp;S|problem solving]]</small> 21:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
532703 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532702 +++$+++ 532702 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.168664700E09 +++$+++ Indeed. Fixed. --''' +++$+++ : Indeed. Fixed. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 21:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
532704 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532702 +++$+++ 532703 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.168665120E09 +++$+++ Thanks again. :) ~ '' +++$+++ ::Thanks again. :) ~ ''[[User:ONUnicorn|<span style="color:#0cc">ONUnicorn</span>]]''<sup>([[User talk:ONUnicorn|Talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/ONUnicorn|Contribs]])</sup><small>[[WP:P&amp;S|problem solving]]</small> 21:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
532705 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532702 +++$+++ 532702 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.168737840E09 +++$+++ Hi. First of all, you should a capitalised letter for the surname also :-) Sometimes it is hard to write an article that reads neutral, I know. Follow the link and try again, if there's any problem, ask me. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. First of all, you should a capitalised letter for the surname also :-) Sometimes it is hard to write an article that reads neutral, I know. Follow the link and try again, if there's any problem, ask me. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 17:24, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
532706 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532702 +++$+++ 532702 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.168739040E09 +++$+++ The one in the title. Sorry, I forgot to put it there... Now I deleted the protected page so you should be able to edit it. --''' +++$+++ : The one in the title. Sorry, I forgot to put it there... Now I deleted the protected page so you should be able to edit it. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 17:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

8415 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8415 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-14 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.268616660E09 +++$+++ Maybe in four years things chance, on Wikipedia everything must be verified, you have been reported and I will await an admins response on the matter rather than continuous edit warring on articles.  +++$+++ Maybe in four years things chance, on Wikipedia everything must be verified, you have been reported and I will await an admins response on the matter rather than continuous edit warring on articles. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 18:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
8416 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8415 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.268616960E09 +++$+++ Also, can I ask because usually this question gets ignored by IP's who do this, what would the artist gain from a fan rising their sales on Wikipedia? It just created a false account. Also there is no section in the link or on the RIAA website that says \"chart success\"  +++$+++ ::Also, can I ask because usually this question gets ignored by IP's who do this, what would the artist gain from a fan rising their sales on Wikipedia? It just created a false account. Also there is no section in the link or on the RIAA website that says "chart success" [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 18:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
8417 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8415 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.268621520E09 +++$+++ Then tell me where the \"chart success\" section is on the Riaa website? and all the french certifications listed are dead links!  +++$+++ ::Then tell me where the "chart success" section is on the Riaa website? and all the french certifications listed are dead links! [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 19:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
8418 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8415 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.268623200E09 +++$+++ Well if you can find the information, then I won't delete it, if you can't then I will it's simple. and in the chart success section it should have been cited how it is now, with refs in the charts section and the chart success.  +++$+++ :::Well if you can find the information, then I won't delete it, if you can't then I will it's simple. and in the chart success section it should have been cited how it is now, with refs in the charts section and the chart success. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 20:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
8419 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8415 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.268623680E09 +++$+++ Nope, it's fine I will not edit then, they're too messy, too inflated and too badly sourced, it would take me about 50 years to fix her album, when I said I'd go through earlier, I didn't think they was so bad, all the references are badly done with no retrieval date, and every single chart column has \"Should be certified 3x Platinum\" or something, which doesn't exist in the music industry, it's either certified or it's not. Also as an act of good faith I've retracted my request for the admin to review your edits as I was hasty. Thank you.  +++$+++ :::Nope, it's fine I will not edit then, they're too messy, too inflated and too badly sourced, it would take me about 50 years to fix her album, when I said I'd go through earlier, I didn't think they was so bad, all the references are badly done with no retrieval date, and every single chart column has "Should be certified 3x Platinum" or something, which doesn't exist in the music industry, it's either certified or it's not. Also as an act of good faith I've retracted my request for the admin to review your edits as I was hasty. Thank you. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 20:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

270560 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-30 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.248987900E09 +++$+++ For information, I've [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fertilisation_of_Orchids&diff=305043803&oldid=305028292 implemented the proposed change to the Influence section], briefly summarising Gray's statement rather than making it a blockquote. Will introduce some more into that section using Thompson as a source. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 10:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Having done that, I've [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fertilisation_of_Orchids&curid=21436165&diff=305077866&oldid=305075662 tweaked the lead] to reflect that information and give more impact to the influence of the book. .  +++$+++ For information, I've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fertilisation_of_Orchids&diff=305043803&oldid=305028292 implemented the proposed change to the Influence section], briefly summarising Gray's statement rather than making it a blockquote. Will introduce some more into that section using Thompson as a source. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 10:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Having done that, I've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fertilisation_of_Orchids&curid=21436165&diff=305077866&oldid=305075662 tweaked the lead] to reflect that information and give more impact to the influence of the book. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 14:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
270561 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270560 +++$+++ 270560 +++$+++ 2009-07-30 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.248988620E09 +++$+++ It looks like you are improving it by adding concrete detail. It is hard for me to evaluate it now, piecemeal.  I will just have to wait and see how it looks when done. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :It looks like you are improving it by adding concrete detail. It is hard for me to evaluate it now, piecemeal.  I will just have to wait and see how it looks when done. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
270562 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270560 +++$+++ 270561 +++$+++ 2009-07-30 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.249017000E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that's me done now. Hope you find it acceptable, any comments or suggestions will be most welcome. . .  +++$+++ ::Thanks, that's me done now. Hope you find it acceptable, any comments or suggestions will be most welcome. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:10, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
270563 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270560 +++$+++ 270562 +++$+++ 2009-07-30 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.249018920E09 +++$+++ OK. I'll look through it. To think that I supported it originally to get \"some action\" going on the nomination that seemed stalled! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::OK. I'll look through it. To think that I supported it originally to get "some action" going on the nomination that seemed stalled! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
270564 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270560 +++$+++ 270563 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.249105140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your support, I appreciate what you've done for the article and also feel myself that it's pretty difficult to see the article with fresh eyes after doing a lot of editing on it. Re. your request, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Coevolution&diff=305343202&oldid=292556573 this] was an example of trying to improve related pages \u2013 still a lot to do, as the example in that article of the moth and orchid could do with a transplant from the ''Fertilisation of Orchids'' sections relating to that subject. It's never-ending! Thanks again, .  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for your support, I appreciate what you've done for the article and also feel myself that it's pretty difficult to see the article with fresh eyes after doing a lot of editing on it. Re. your request, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coevolution&diff=305343202&oldid=292556573 this] was an example of trying to improve related pages – still a lot to do, as the example in that article of the moth and orchid could do with a transplant from the ''Fertilisation of Orchids'' sections relating to that subject. It's never-ending! Thanks again, . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
270565 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270560 +++$+++ 270564 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.249105920E09 +++$+++ I've always admired Darwin but much more so now. The article dramatically illustrates the process through which his theory was developed. I think it is a wonderful article and was improved through the suggestions at FAC. You were right to be open-minded about the suggestions! Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I've always admired Darwin but much more so now. The article dramatically illustrates the process through which his theory was developed. I think it is a wonderful article and was improved through the suggestions at FAC. You were right to be open-minded about the suggestions! Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
270566 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270560 +++$+++ 270565 +++$+++ 2009-08-01 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.249150680E09 +++$+++ Well, I certainly took heed of your suggestions as well! Your advice on quality gave a good focus, and is very much welcomed. Thanks again,  +++$+++ ::::::Well, I certainly took heed of your suggestions as well! Your advice on quality gave a good focus, and is very much welcomed. Thanks again, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 11:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

532707 +++$+++ Doctorevil64 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.168824900E09 +++$+++ This page, which you recently edited on, is constantly getting vandalized by a rival school. Could you please put an edit lock on the page?  +++$+++ This page, which you recently edited on, is constantly getting vandalized by a rival school. Could you please put an edit lock on the page? [[User:Doctorevil64|Rohan]] 17:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
532708 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532707 +++$+++ 532707 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.168841520E09 +++$+++ Hi. The vandalism is not so heavy as you put it. In the log I don't see more than one vandalism per day in average. So I think the protection is not necessary since we try to avoid protecting the articles in general. For now, let just keep an eye on the article and if the situation aggravates, let me know and I will protect it. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The vandalism is not so heavy as you put it. In the log I don't see more than one vandalism per day in average. So I think the protection is not necessary since we try to avoid protecting the articles in general. For now, let just keep an eye on the article and if the situation aggravates, let me know and I will protect it. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 22:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
532709 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532707 +++$+++ 532707 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.168844280E09 +++$+++ Yeah, sometimes it is hard to convince the other users that a person deserves an article. You see, there are thousands of vanity pages created every day and it takes time to deal with them all. I suggest you enter the deletion discussion (follow the link in the AfD notice) and present your arguments there. It will be the best thing to do. --''' +++$+++ : Yeah, sometimes it is hard to convince the other users that a person deserves an article. You see, there are thousands of vanity pages created every day and it takes time to deal with them all. I suggest you enter the deletion discussion (follow the link in the AfD notice) and present your arguments there. It will be the best thing to do. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 22:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

532711 +++$+++ Geohevy +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532711 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-17 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.169025840E09 +++$+++ I edited my userpage at school, without logging in, and you reverted the edit. Please change it back  +++$+++ I edited my userpage at school, without logging in, and you reverted the edit. Please change it back [[User:Geohevy|Geohevy]] 01:24, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
532712 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532711 +++$+++ 532711 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.169057940E09 +++$+++ Ok, sorry. I couldn't have known that it was you, it could have been a vandal... Reverted now. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, sorry. I couldn't have known that it was you, it could have been a vandal... Reverted now. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 10:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
532713 +++$+++ Geohevy +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532711 +++$+++ 532712 +++$+++ 2007-02-09 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.171088580E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I understand. I won;t do that again.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. I understand. I won;t do that again. [[User:Geohevy|Geohevy]] 22:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

8424 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8424 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-20 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.269135600E09 +++$+++ My examples, the ones you didn't change in her discography. ''Celine Dion'' the source says 5M, yet you left 5.5M, because that's what ''YOU'' believe it sold, and didn't change the source either. Next D'eux, the source says 8M, yet you didn't change the figures, because you want it to stay at 9M, because that's what ''you'' believe. ''These are special Times'' says 15M even though the source ''You'' picked which lists all her albums says 13.5M, why, because you don't want to hurt her sales, even though they are NOT true. Either way 8notes & superpics are NOT reliable so they will be soon removed.-- +++$+++ My examples, the ones you didn't change in her discography. ''Celine Dion'' the source says 5M, yet you left 5.5M, because that's what ''YOU'' believe it sold, and didn't change the source either. Next D'eux, the source says 8M, yet you didn't change the figures, because you want it to stay at 9M, because that's what ''you'' believe. ''These are special Times'' says 15M even though the source ''You'' picked which lists all her albums says 13.5M, why, because you don't want to hurt her sales, even though they are NOT true. Either way 8notes & superpics are NOT reliable so they will be soon removed.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="purple" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="blue" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Cont.</font>]] 18:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
8425 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8424 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.269409380E09 +++$+++ I can do whatever I please on my page, either way you can always see it by comparing versions. Take care of your own talk page.-- +++$+++ ::I can do whatever I please on my page, either way you can always see it by comparing versions. Take care of your own talk page.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|Petergriffin9901]] ([[User talk:Petergriffin9901|talk]]) 22:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

8427 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-23 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.269410700E09 +++$+++ Another thing, please read [[Wikipedia:GOODCHARTS]] InfoDisc is a valid source for French certifications. ChartsPlus is also licensed for subscribers of the site, it gets certifications before the BPI updates them for the public. Please stop making policy and actually read up on things.  +++$+++ Another thing, please read [[Wikipedia:GOODCHARTS]] InfoDisc is a valid source for French certifications. ChartsPlus is also licensed for subscribers of the site, it gets certifications before the BPI updates them for the public. Please stop making policy and actually read up on things. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 23:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
8428 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8427 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-24 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.269471060E09 +++$+++ That was my fault with the Ballads, I called it Gold when I should say 100,000+. If you look at all albums released in 2008 on that page and their certifications, you'll see some of them certified Gold when The Ballads is higher on the list of biggest selling albums, which means it sold 100,000 or more. I take full responsibility, I shouldn't have called it Gold I should have said 100,000 or more. I will however revert all of your edits on the InfoDisc, and if you make them again I will report you. All sales are estimates Max, ALL sales, you can never have a clear approximation because not all shops and retailers have always been taken into account, but since it says estime I will put a note saying \"sales estimatation\", if the website is valid, then everything on there is valid, if something is on Wikipedia:GOODCHART, you know, where you go to find out what is allowed and what isn't? Then I will use it.  +++$+++ :: That was my fault with the Ballads, I called it Gold when I should say 100,000+. If you look at all albums released in 2008 on that page and their certifications, you'll see some of them certified Gold when The Ballads is higher on the list of biggest selling albums, which means it sold 100,000 or more. I take full responsibility, I shouldn't have called it Gold I should have said 100,000 or more. I will however revert all of your edits on the InfoDisc, and if you make them again I will report you. All sales are estimates Max, ALL sales, you can never have a clear approximation because not all shops and retailers have always been taken into account, but since it says estime I will put a note saying "sales estimatation", if the website is valid, then everything on there is valid, if something is on Wikipedia:GOODCHART, you know, where you go to find out what is allowed and what isn't? Then I will use it. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 15:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
8429 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8427 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-24 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.269471720E09 +++$+++ Also, if you have a problem with my edits, report me to an admin, not IKnow23, he's not an admin and can not issue me with blocks.  +++$+++ :::Also, if you have a problem with my edits, report me to an admin, not IKnow23, he's not an admin and can not issue me with blocks. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 16:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
8430 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8427 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-24 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.269471960E09 +++$+++ One more thing, '''you''' don't make policy, if you have a problem with me using sources from Wikipedia:Record charts then bring it up for discussion, unless it says on that page that you shouldn't used the sales from InfoDisc then I will continue to use them.  +++$+++ :::One more thing, '''you''' don't make policy, if you have a problem with me using sources from Wikipedia:Record charts then bring it up for discussion, unless it says on that page that you shouldn't used the sales from InfoDisc then I will continue to use them. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 16:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

613074 +++$+++ Cxw +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-13 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.205439000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Cxw|Cxw]] ([[User talk:Cxw|talk]]) 13:10, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
613075 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613074 +++$+++ 613074 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.205439300E09 +++$+++ Believe it or not, the level of vandalism is still pretty low for a featured article, and there's an idea that we avoid protecting such articles so that we can showcase the \"anyone can edit\" idea. If it gets really bad it can be semi-protected for a short time to give us a break, but best to avoid that if possible. Thanks, ..  +++$+++ :Believe it or not, the level of vandalism is still pretty low for a featured article, and there's an idea that we avoid protecting such articles so that we can showcase the "anyone can edit" idea. If it gets really bad it can be semi-protected for a short time to give us a break, but best to avoid that if possible. Thanks, .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 13:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
613076 +++$+++ Arcayne +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613074 +++$+++ 613074 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.205793060E09 +++$+++ Speaking of such, what the hell was OrangeMarlin going on about [[User_talk:Orangemarlin\/Archives_6#Cretaceous.E2.80.93Tertiary_extinction_event here]]? I was not aware of ''any'' personal attack or uncivil behavior on my part, and ''completely'' unaware of editors I have driven away from the project on account of my \"behavior\" there? That he called for my warning or blocking is something I consider to be a serious breach in civility, and I would absolutely want an apology (or at least, an explanation) which so far has been unforthcoming. -  +++$+++ :Speaking of such, what the hell was OrangeMarlin going on about [[User_talk:Orangemarlin/Archives_6#Cretaceous.E2.80.93Tertiary_extinction_event here]]? I was not aware of ''any'' personal attack or uncivil behavior on my part, and ''completely'' unaware of editors I have driven away from the project on account of my "behavior" there? That he called for my warning or blocking is something I consider to be a serious breach in civility, and I would absolutely want an apology (or at least, an explanation) which so far has been unforthcoming. - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 15:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
613077 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613074 +++$+++ 613076 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.205793660E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm not a mind reader. Since you've [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Orangemarlin&diff=198870712&oldid=198854504 asked him], see what he says. A clarification or a gracious retraction would doubtless resolve things, for goodness sake don't go around suggesting that you're demanding an apology which needlessly raises the temperature. ..  +++$+++ ::Well, I'm not a mind reader. Since you've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Orangemarlin&diff=198870712&oldid=198854504 asked him], see what he says. A clarification or a gracious retraction would doubtless resolve things, for goodness sake don't go around suggesting that you're demanding an apology which needlessly raises the temperature. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
613078 +++$+++ Arcayne +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613074 +++$+++ 613077 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.205796540E09 +++$+++ He has [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Orangemarlin&diff=198873496&oldid=198870712 replied] after my request for clarity without really supplying me with any info. He isn't really listening or responding helpfully at all. Dave, I am not sure, but I am thinking that this might ''need'' to be pursued, so as to not bite me on the ass later. Your thoughts - as always - are invaluable. -  +++$+++ :::He has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Orangemarlin&diff=198873496&oldid=198870712 replied] after my request for clarity without really supplying me with any info. He isn't really listening or responding helpfully at all. Dave, I am not sure, but I am thinking that this might ''need'' to be pursued, so as to not bite me on the ass later. Your thoughts - as always - are invaluable. - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 16:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
613079 +++$+++ Arcayne +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613074 +++$+++ 613077 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.205982360E09 +++$+++ Still waiting on those invaluable thoughts, Dave... -  +++$+++ :::Still waiting on those invaluable thoughts, Dave... - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 20:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
613080 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613074 +++$+++ 613079 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.205986200E09 +++$+++ Have patience, I'm collecting my thoughts. ..  +++$+++ ::::Have patience, I'm collecting my thoughts. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

8431 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-24 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.269472140E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Shipments_and_Sales_in_box Please \"voice\" your opinion in form of agree or disagree please] if it's resolved there won't even be a sales box, but in the prose I will put \"estimated French sales are etc\" if you have a problem with that PLEASE bring it up for discussion  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Shipments_and_Sales_in_box Please "voice" your opinion in form of agree or disagree please] if it's resolved there won't even be a sales box, but in the prose I will put "estimated French sales are etc" if you have a problem with that PLEASE bring it up for discussion [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 16:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
8432 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-24 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.269495480E09 +++$+++ Okay, I changed it back-- +++$+++ ::Okay, I changed it back--[[User:Petergriffin9901|Petergriffin9901]] ([[User talk:Petergriffin9901|talk]]) 22:38, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

87571 +++$+++ Hunter_Kahn +++$+++ Sweetmoose6 +++$+++ 87571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-08 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.257722460E09 +++$+++ Just so you know, [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_November_6|I've nominated]] your [[Collision (film)]] entry for a DYK. Hope you don't mind... \u2014 <b> +++$+++ Just so you know, [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_November_6|I've nominated]] your [[Collision (film)]] entry for a DYK. Hope you don't mind... — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hunter</font>]] [[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#595454">Kahn</font>]] <small><sub>([[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="darkblue">c</font>]])</sub></small></b> 15:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
87572 +++$+++ Hunter_Kahn +++$+++ Sweetmoose6 +++$+++ 87571 +++$+++ 87571 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.257935160E09 +++$+++ No problem! I'm very interested to see the documentary now thanks to this entry! Nice work, and feel free to get in touch with me if I can ever be of any help in the future... \u2014 <b> +++$+++ *No problem! I'm very interested to see the documentary now thanks to this entry! Nice work, and feel free to get in touch with me if I can ever be of any help in the future... — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hunter</font>]] [[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#595454">Kahn</font>]] <small><sub>([[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="darkblue">c</font>]])</sub></small></b> 02:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

532725 +++$+++ Paulcantrell2 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532725 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-22 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.172209560E09 +++$+++ I would like to get a rating on [[Diocese of Ely]], [[Owen Spencer-Thomas]] biogrpahy and [[Sounding Brass]] which I have been udating from time to time. I've read the pages on this but still cannot follow the intructions satisfactorily.  Could you explain how I do this?   +++$+++ I would like to get a rating on [[Diocese of Ely]], [[Owen Spencer-Thomas]] biogrpahy and [[Sounding Brass]] which I have been udating from time to time. I've read the pages on this but still cannot follow the intructions satisfactorily.  Could you explain how I do this?  [[User:Paulcantrell2|Paulcantrell2]] 21:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
532726 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532725 +++$+++ 532725 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.172366160E09 +++$+++ Hi. I am not sure what exactly you would like. The articles seem pretty ok to me. If you mean the rating within a wiki project, I guess the best thing is to contact someone from there. Sorry, I guess I am not very helpful this time... Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I am not sure what exactly you would like. The articles seem pretty ok to me. If you mean the rating within a wiki project, I guess the best thing is to contact someone from there. Sorry, I guess I am not very helpful this time... Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 17:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
532727 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532725 +++$+++ 532725 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.172540640E09 +++$+++ Hi. The original argumentation was: ''According to Google, there is a Frazer's Theory (to do with religion and morality), but this isn't it.'' Besides, if it was discovered the same day you posted the article, it might be a littel too fresh... Well, if you provide sufficient references, I see no problem in keeping the article, if you want, I can recreate it. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The original argumentation was: ''According to Google, there is a Frazer's Theory (to do with religion and morality), but this isn't it.'' Besides, if it was discovered the same day you posted the article, it might be a littel too fresh... Well, if you provide sufficient references, I see no problem in keeping the article, if you want, I can recreate it. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 17:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
532728 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532725 +++$+++ 532725 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.172770440E09 +++$+++ I guess you are complaining because of the deletion of the article. It was not even written in English and it contained very little text, apart from links. Try again with a longer article, and in English. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : I guess you are complaining because of the deletion of the article. It was not even written in English and it contained very little text, apart from links. Try again with a longer article, and in English. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 09:34, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

8438 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-28 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.269845580E09 +++$+++ ?  +++$+++ ? [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 23:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
8439 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8438 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-29 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.269900600E09 +++$+++ First of all, here you are again inventing your own policies. There is nothing on that page that says I can't give you a warning for Adding FAKE and NOT RELIABLE information. Your a fake and inventing your own policies. PS: weren't you the one who said you can't remove warnings from your talk page, even if they are unjustified? As I thought, your a hypocrite as well.-- +++$+++ ::First of all, here you are again inventing your own policies. There is nothing on that page that says I can't give you a warning for Adding FAKE and NOT RELIABLE information. Your a fake and inventing your own policies. PS: weren't you the one who said you can't remove warnings from your talk page, even if they are unjustified? As I thought, your a hypocrite as well.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="blue" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]]  15:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
8440 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8438 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-29 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.269902400E09 +++$+++ Please do not post on my talk page about something, I didn't ask your opinion on, unless you're going to reply to things I actually want you to reply, I want you to reply to the point of why did you lie to an admin and say I was inflating sales?  +++$+++ ::Please do not post on my talk page about something, I didn't ask your opinion on, unless you're going to reply to things I actually want you to reply, I want you to reply to the point of why did you lie to an admin and say I was inflating sales? [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 15:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

270583 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-02 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.249197900E09 +++$+++ It looks very good.  I'll probably do a touchup for technical stuff, but I think I'll notify the opposers to reconsider once that's done.  Let me know when you are done working it over.  Thanks!  Did you get my email?-- +++$+++ It looks very good.  I'll probably do a touchup for technical stuff, but I think I'll notify the opposers to reconsider once that's done.  Let me know when you are done working it over.  Thanks!  Did you get my email?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:25, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
270584 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270583 +++$+++ 270583 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.249198380E09 +++$+++ Got the email and don't know what to make of it. One thing is clear from your article:  Nixon was really into to \"tactics\". In fact, Douglas sounds a little \"flaky\". I'm pretty much done. Hope the quotes are reduced enough to satisfy. I tried to leave in the ones that gave a flavor of the rhetoric. &mdash; +++$+++ :Got the email and don't know what to make of it. One thing is clear from your article:  Nixon was really into to "tactics". In fact, Douglas sounds a little "flaky". I'm pretty much done. Hope the quotes are reduced enough to satisfy. I tried to leave in the ones that gave a flavor of the rhetoric. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:33, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
270585 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270583 +++$+++ 270584 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.249198740E09 +++$+++ How could they not know those things about Chotiner?  After ten years' association with the man.  As for Douglas, probably.  Or more of a feeling that she was invincible, her NY Times obit said that the 1950 loss was the first major setback in her entire life.  Before that, as the final quote makes clear, things just came easy to her.  -- +++$+++ ::How could they not know those things about Chotiner?  After ten years' association with the man.  As for Douglas, probably.  Or more of a feeling that she was invincible, her NY Times obit said that the 1950 loss was the first major setback in her entire life.  Before that, as the final quote makes clear, things just came easy to her.  --[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
270586 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270583 +++$+++ 270585 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.249199040E09 +++$+++ They were very concrete in their thinking. The fact they would need to write those things down indicates that, I think. &mdash; +++$+++ :::They were very concrete in their thinking. The fact they would need to write those things down indicates that, I think. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
270587 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270583 +++$+++ 270586 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.249200960E09 +++$+++ True.  I've gone through it and made a few minor changes.  Sorry, I just like \"iconic\" vehicle!  They have it displayed (surely a replica) at the Nixon Museum.  Incidentally, this article has no heroes.  Everyone winds up looking bad.  Except maybe the minor candidates ...-- +++$+++ ::::True.  I've gone through it and made a few minor changes.  Sorry, I just like "iconic" vehicle!  They have it displayed (surely a replica) at the Nixon Museum.  Incidentally, this article has no heroes.  Everyone winds up looking bad.  Except maybe the minor candidates ...--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
270588 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270583 +++$+++ 270587 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.249201560E09 +++$+++ Well, if \"iconic\" passes the POV test, it's OK with me.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Well, if "iconic" passes the POV test, it's OK with me.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
270589 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270583 +++$+++ 270588 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.249201740E09 +++$+++ It's to contrast to Douglas's \"Helencopter\".  Both had vehicles that got a lot of comment in the spring of 1950.-- +++$+++ ::::::It's to contrast to Douglas's "Helencopter".  Both had vehicles that got a lot of comment in the spring of 1950.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:29, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
270590 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270583 +++$+++ 270589 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.249202160E09 +++$+++ But \"iconic\" is something like the [[Statue of Liberty]]. I don't think the \"Helencopter\" is iconic. I have never heard of it before. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::But "iconic" is something like the [[Statue of Liberty]]. I don't think the "Helencopter" is iconic. I have never heard of it before. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:36, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
270591 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270583 +++$+++ 270589 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.249202340E09 +++$+++ Hm.  Good point.  Notable?  Noteworthy?  What's a good word for this?-- +++$+++ :::::::Hm.  Good point.  Notable?  Noteworthy?  What's a good word for this?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
270592 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270583 +++$+++ 270591 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.249202520E09 +++$+++ I just put \"campaign vehicle\"  almost anything is a bit peacocky.-- +++$+++ ::::::::I just put "campaign vehicle"  almost anything is a bit peacocky.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
270593 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270583 +++$+++ 270592 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.249202820E09 +++$+++ Sounds good. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::Sounds good. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

532729 +++$+++ Prunk +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532729 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-01 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.172779560E09 +++$+++ Morda si spregledal referenco, glede \u0161olske afere z Jankovi\u0107evim sinom ki je na Mladinini strani - http:\/\/www.mladina.si\/tednik\/200404\/clanek\/nar-kdo_je_kdaj--vanja_pirc\/  +++$+++ Morda si spregledal referenco, glede šolske afere z Jankovićevim sinom ki je na Mladinini strani - http://www.mladina.si/tednik/200404/clanek/nar-kdo_je_kdaj--vanja_pirc/ [[User:Prunk|Prunk]] 12:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
532730 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532729 +++$+++ 532729 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.172788620E09 +++$+++ Aja, tam je... No, ker ej to angle\u0161ki projekt, mogo\u010de ne bi \u0161kodila angle\u0161ka referenca, \u010de pa ne, pa naredi footnote. LP --''' +++$+++ : Aja, tam je... No, ker ej to angleški projekt, mogoče ne bi škodila angleška referenca, če pa ne, pa naredi footnote. LP --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 14:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

532731 +++$+++ Brack +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532731 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-06 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.173239700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Brack|Brack]] 19:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
532732 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532731 +++$+++ 532731 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.173241980E09 +++$+++ Reconsidered and restored. Though I would prefer trimming of some sections... Regards, --''' +++$+++ : Reconsidered and restored. Though I would prefer trimming of some sections... Regards, --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 20:33, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

8445 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-13 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.271161320E09 +++$+++ After you mentioned these books I searched for them in a few libraries in order to add them to Mariah's discography. Unfortunately, I have not been able to track down any of these books. If possible I'd like to ask you to add these 3 sources and whatever cert they hold for Mariah, like the single certs for her before 97 in Australia, and her New Zealand and Belgium certs for her singles. Since you own or have access to these books\/pamphlets, I was wondering if you can add them to the article, as you did to Celine's. Thanks Max, I'd appreciate it if you can!:D-- +++$+++ After you mentioned these books I searched for them in a few libraries in order to add them to Mariah's discography. Unfortunately, I have not been able to track down any of these books. If possible I'd like to ask you to add these 3 sources and whatever cert they hold for Mariah, like the single certs for her before 97 in Australia, and her New Zealand and Belgium certs for her singles. Since you own or have access to these books/pamphlets, I was wondering if you can add them to the article, as you did to Celine's. Thanks Max, I'd appreciate it if you can!:D--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="blue" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]]  05:22, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
8446 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8445 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-13 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.271206140E09 +++$+++ Hey Max, Thanks allot anyway, I guess I'll just keep trying to find those books online. I appreciate it though, thanks!:D-- +++$+++ ::Hey Max, Thanks allot anyway, I guess I'll just keep trying to find those books online. I appreciate it though, thanks!:D--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="blue" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]]  17:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

532734 +++$+++ Feisty12 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532734 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-15 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.174023060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Feisty12|Feisty12]] 22:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
532735 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532734 +++$+++ 532734 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.174058760E09 +++$+++ The problem is that you created an article about a website that doesn't exist yet. So what I suggest you do is to wait until it launches and try to avoid phrases like ''written to reflect Jasmine's wity and down-to-earth approach to money advice'', because this is not an encyclopedic tone. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : The problem is that you created an article about a website that doesn't exist yet. So what I suggest you do is to wait until it launches and try to avoid phrases like ''written to reflect Jasmine's wity and down-to-earth approach to money advice'', because this is not an encyclopedic tone. Regards, --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 08:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

8447 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8447 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-05 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.273101480E09 +++$+++ As you see, many countries are using this forum, which doesn't even mention anything about their certifications. I would like to improve her charts as I already did with Mariah Carey, however I'd prefer to wait until all the countries are properly sourced. Can you source all these? Thanks Max.-- +++$+++ As you see, many countries are using this forum, which doesn't even mention anything about their certifications. I would like to improve her charts as I already did with Mariah Carey, however I'd prefer to wait until all the countries are properly sourced. Can you source all these? Thanks Max.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]]  16:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
8448 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8447 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-05-09 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.273408320E09 +++$+++ Can you tell me how to find this page once I have registered? Thanks...:)-- +++$+++ ::Can you tell me how to find this page once I have registered? Thanks...:)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]]  05:32, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
8449 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8447 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-05-09 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.273452540E09 +++$+++ Ok so Iv'e looked at the article, and the certifications look in order, however I still have a question. How do we know that these are even real certifications or album charts? I mean if you look at the left side of the column, you'll see Columbian, Chilean, Czech Republic album charts, and non are sourced. How do we know those are even real album charts, considering they are not sourced by an official reference.-- +++$+++ ::::Ok so Iv'e looked at the article, and the certifications look in order, however I still have a question. How do we know that these are even real certifications or album charts? I mean if you look at the left side of the column, you'll see Columbian, Chilean, Czech Republic album charts, and non are sourced. How do we know those are even real album charts, considering they are not sourced by an official reference.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]]  17:49, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

8450 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-10 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.273475760E09 +++$+++ That's not what I mean. Heres my example, we have \"German Album Charts\" with [http:\/\/www.musicline.de\/de\/chartverfolgung_summary\/artist\/Dion,Celine\/?type=longplay this source] in the left side of the chart. That's how we know it's an actual album chart or system. Here we have again for the, \"Italian Album Chart\" with [http:\/\/www.fimi.it\/classifiche_artisti.php this source], which is the official album charts for Italy. Then we have for example, \"Malaysian Album Charts\", without any link to the countries official album charts, making it hard to know if it's even a real system. I understand the part about saying, Chile Platinum, Columbia Platinum, but how do we know \"Chilean Album Charts\" is real, if that album chart isn't sourced?-- +++$+++ That's not what I mean. Heres my example, we have "German Album Charts" with [http://www.musicline.de/de/chartverfolgung_summary/artist/Dion,Celine/?type=longplay this source] in the left side of the chart. That's how we know it's an actual album chart or system. Here we have again for the, "Italian Album Chart" with [http://www.fimi.it/classifiche_artisti.php this source], which is the official album charts for Italy. Then we have for example, "Malaysian Album Charts", without any link to the countries official album charts, making it hard to know if it's even a real system. I understand the part about saying, Chile Platinum, Columbia Platinum, but how do we know "Chilean Album Charts" is real, if that album chart isn't sourced?--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]]  00:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
8451 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8450 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-05-10 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.273492200E09 +++$+++ Lol, you read my mind Max, that is pretty much what I was planning to do myself, once I understood your side on the certifications. Take a look after, and maybe you'd like to add some to it-- +++$+++ ::Lol, you read my mind Max, that is pretty much what I was planning to do myself, once I understood your side on the certifications. Take a look after, and maybe you'd like to add some to it--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]]  04:50, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
8452 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8450 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-05-10 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.273496040E09 +++$+++ Ok, take a look at the work I did in these two articles. They actually came out pretty nicely, as I eventually intend to make the transition to all her albums. What do you think?-- +++$+++ :::Ok, take a look at the work I did in these two articles. They actually came out pretty nicely, as I eventually intend to make the transition to all her albums. What do you think?--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]]  05:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

176171 +++$+++ Hut 8.5 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ 176171 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-30 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.304232900E09 +++$+++ You need to read [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]]. Unsourced contentious material must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, and this most definitely includes allegations of murder and serious mental illness. We don't mess around with \"citation needed\" tags for this kind of content. You can only restore the material if you add good quality references for it. The burden is on the editor who wants to add this material to justify its inclusion, not me to justify removing it. '''''<font color=\"#FF0000\"> +++$+++ You need to read [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]]. Unsourced contentious material must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, and this most definitely includes allegations of murder and serious mental illness. We don't mess around with "citation needed" tags for this kind of content. You can only restore the material if you add good quality references for it. The burden is on the editor who wants to add this material to justify its inclusion, not me to justify removing it. '''''<font color="#FF0000">[[User:Hut 8.5|Hut 8.5]]</font>''''' 23:55, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
176172 +++$+++ Hut 8.5 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ 176171 +++$+++ 176171 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.304278080E09 +++$+++ Several of those, especially [http:\/\/www.jamiethompson.net\/jim_gordon.htm] and [http:\/\/rulefortytwo.com\/secret-rock-knowledge\/chapter-7\/jim-gordon\/] do not look like appropriate sources for this type of material (see [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Avoid self-published sources]]). I've added some material to the article myself on this subject with proper sourcing. '''''<font color=\"#FF0000\"> +++$+++ :Several of those, especially [http://www.jamiethompson.net/jim_gordon.htm] and [http://rulefortytwo.com/secret-rock-knowledge/chapter-7/jim-gordon/] do not look like appropriate sources for this type of material (see [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Avoid self-published sources]]). I've added some material to the article myself on this subject with proper sourcing. '''''<font color="#FF0000">[[User:Hut 8.5|Hut 8.5]]</font>''''' 12:28, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
176173 +++$+++ Hut 8.5 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ 176171 +++$+++ 176172 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.304292120E09 +++$+++ OK, I understand. Good luck to your friend. '''''<font color=\"#FF0000\"> +++$+++ ::OK, I understand. Good luck to your friend. '''''<font color="#FF0000">[[User:Hut 8.5|Hut 8.5]]</font>''''' 16:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

532741 +++$+++ AnonMoos +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-07 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.175931660E09 +++$+++ That article badly needs a map, or the reader who is not already intimately familiar with the geography of the Piran bay will have no concrete visual reference to latch on to.  Furthermore, your stated reason for deleting the map which was already on the page sounds extremely stupid, since Croatia can point to generalized traditional principles of maritime border demarcation in support of its claim, while Slovenia has to appeal to special circumstances which it argues override generalized traditional principles of maritime border demarcation in this particular case to support ''its'' claim -- so the situation between the two countries is not absolutely symmetric.  (And even if the situation between the two countries were absolutely symmetric, your \"solution\" of deleting without offering any practical alternative suggestions is hardly helpful.)   +++$+++ That article badly needs a map, or the reader who is not already intimately familiar with the geography of the Piran bay will have no concrete visual reference to latch on to.  Furthermore, your stated reason for deleting the map which was already on the page sounds extremely stupid, since Croatia can point to generalized traditional principles of maritime border demarcation in support of its claim, while Slovenia has to appeal to special circumstances which it argues override generalized traditional principles of maritime border demarcation in this particular case to support ''its'' claim -- so the situation between the two countries is not absolutely symmetric.  (And even if the situation between the two countries were absolutely symmetric, your "solution" of deleting without offering any practical alternative suggestions is hardly helpful.)  [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 00:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
532742 +++$+++ AnonMoos +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532741 +++$+++ 532741 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.176065640E09 +++$+++ But I don't see any reason to have three maps, when the existing situation is pretty clearly covered with one map -- Yellow-colored captions label the areas whose territorial control is undisputed and uncontroversial, while Green-colored captions label the areas which Slovenia wants, and which would be covered by the Drnov\u0161ek-Ra\u010dan agreement, but which Croatia doesn't currently recognize as belonging to Slovenia.   If you have an alternative suggestion to offer for the caption \"claimed by Slovenia\", then by all means offer it, but I think it more or less adequately reflects the current reality, without really fully adopting the position of either side...  +++$+++ :But I don't see any reason to have three maps, when the existing situation is pretty clearly covered with one map -- Yellow-colored captions label the areas whose territorial control is undisputed and uncontroversial, while Green-colored captions label the areas which Slovenia wants, and which would be covered by the Drnovšek-Račan agreement, but which Croatia doesn't currently recognize as belonging to Slovenia.   If you have an alternative suggestion to offer for the caption "claimed by Slovenia", then by all means offer it, but I think it more or less adequately reflects the current reality, without really fully adopting the position of either side... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 13:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
532743 +++$+++ AnonMoos +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532741 +++$+++ 532742 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.176106020E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid I don't really see any major problem -- the current map shows both the undisputed areas (yellow captions) and the areas which would be recognized as Slovenian if the agreement came into full force, which it hasn't yet (green captions).  +++$+++ ::I'm afraid I don't really see any major problem -- the current map shows both the undisputed areas (yellow captions) and the areas which would be recognized as Slovenian if the agreement came into full force, which it hasn't yet (green captions). [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 01:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
532744 +++$+++ AnonMoos +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532741 +++$+++ 532743 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 10:25:00 +++$+++ 1.176139500E09 +++$+++ Then what is your concrete practical suggestion to change the caption \"claimed by Slovenia\" to?  +++$+++ :::Then what is your concrete practical suggestion to change the caption "claimed by Slovenia" to? [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 10:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

270600 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-04 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.249426740E09 +++$+++ Both of them were utter nut jobs, I'm discovering.  Meyer was arrested days after the general election on bigamy charges, and turned out to have six wives (well, there may have been one valid divorce).  Levitt was a former law professor, the plaintiff in [[Ex parte Levitt]] which sought to have Hugo Black disqualified from being on the Supreme Court, and later got in a lawsuit against Gerald Smith, the anti Semitic fellow nut job.  Amazing they got any votes.  Too bad it would be a distraction to put it in the article.  Well, maybe a phrase about Levitt, \"a former law professor and plaintiff in [[Ex parte Levitt]], running on an anti-Catholic platform\", eh?-- +++$+++ Both of them were utter nut jobs, I'm discovering.  Meyer was arrested days after the general election on bigamy charges, and turned out to have six wives (well, there may have been one valid divorce).  Levitt was a former law professor, the plaintiff in [[Ex parte Levitt]] which sought to have Hugo Black disqualified from being on the Supreme Court, and later got in a lawsuit against Gerald Smith, the anti Semitic fellow nut job.  Amazing they got any votes.  Too bad it would be a distraction to put it in the article.  Well, maybe a phrase about Levitt, "a former law professor and plaintiff in [[Ex parte Levitt]], running on an anti-Catholic platform", eh?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 15:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
270601 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270600 +++$+++ 270600 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.249427040E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I think you could add that as the other fringe candidate's occupation (runs dating service) is given. Re \"War in Korea; conflict in California\", is a semi-colon good in a heading? Looks funny.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Yeah, I think you could add that as the other fringe candidate's occupation (runs dating service) is given. Re "War in Korea; conflict in California", is a semi-colon good in a heading? Looks funny.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
270602 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270600 +++$+++ 270601 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.249427520E09 +++$+++ See no harm in changing it to a comma, I'll do that.  Apparently Levitt was once a judge in the Virgin Islands and ruled that women had to be allowed to vote.  I've started a stub article on him and will expand it tonight.-- +++$+++ ::See no harm in changing it to a comma, I'll do that.  Apparently Levitt was once a judge in the Virgin Islands and ruled that women had to be allowed to vote.  I've started a stub article on him and will expand it tonight.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 16:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
270603 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270600 +++$+++ 270602 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.249427760E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/law.wlu.edu\/faculty\/history\/levitt.asp Interesting if no doubt sanitized].-- +++$+++ :::[http://law.wlu.edu/faculty/history/levitt.asp Interesting if no doubt sanitized].--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 16:16, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
270604 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270600 +++$+++ 270603 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.249428060E09 +++$+++ How do you find these things?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::How do you find these things?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
270605 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270600 +++$+++ 270604 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.249428180E09 +++$+++ Curiosity.  I got interested in the fringe candidates.  It was hard to find much on Meyer, but Levitt was easy on Google.  I've got to go to work but I'll write Levitt's article later!-- +++$+++ :::::Curiosity.  I got interested in the fringe candidates.  It was hard to find much on Meyer, but Levitt was easy on Google.  I've got to go to work but I'll write Levitt's article later!--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 16:23, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

8457 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-16 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.279349160E09 +++$+++ First of all your mistaken Max. Billboard does not list Carey's holiday album at 11 million sales, it lists it at 12. Carey's website lists it at 11. Secondly, in that page there is a section where it lists the best-selling of all time. You have no proof or hard evidence or anything, your just making claims. I have a reliable source claiming something, that it all.-- +++$+++ First of all your mistaken Max. Billboard does not list Carey's holiday album at 11 million sales, it lists it at 12. Carey's website lists it at 11. Secondly, in that page there is a section where it lists the best-selling of all time. You have no proof or hard evidence or anything, your just making claims. I have a reliable source claiming something, that it all.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]]  23:46, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
8458 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8457 +++$+++ 8457 +++$+++ 2010-07-16 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.279349520E09 +++$+++ In addition, Fox is an independent source, one that assists its parent source (her website).-- +++$+++ :In addition, Fox is an independent source, one that assists its parent source (her website).--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]]  23:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

532747 +++$+++ ReidarM +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-12 08:33:00 +++$+++ 1.176391980E09 +++$+++ ...not questioning your deletion, just trying to understand. I stumbled across this as I was researching Hitfarm, and actually found the google [http:\/\/72.14.235.104\/search?q=cache:Uvh9P5Ame_kJ:en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hitfarm+hitfarm+wiki&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1 cache] of the article helpful.  +++$+++ ...not questioning your deletion, just trying to understand. I stumbled across this as I was researching Hitfarm, and actually found the google [http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:Uvh9P5Ame_kJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitfarm+hitfarm+wiki&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1 cache] of the article helpful. [[User:ReidarM|ReidarM]] 08:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
532748 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532747 +++$+++ 532747 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 08:58:00 +++$+++ 1.176393480E09 +++$+++ Yeah, typographical error... I wanted to write ad (advertisment) but pressed the wrong button and it was too late before I realized the mistake ;-) Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Yeah, typographical error... I wanted to write ad (advertisment) but pressed the wrong button and it was too late before I realized the mistake ;-) Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 08:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
532749 +++$+++ ReidarM +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532747 +++$+++ 532748 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.176399540E09 +++$+++ irony of fate...hitfarm makes money on typographical errors (in domain names)  +++$+++ :: irony of fate...hitfarm makes money on typographical errors (in domain names) [[User:ReidarM|ReidarM]] 10:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
532750 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532747 +++$+++ 532747 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.176825840E09 +++$+++ Verjetno je pri\u0161lo do tega slu\u010dajno ob blokadi celega niza IP-jev, s katerih je prihajal vandalizem, pa je bil po nesre\u010di tudi tvoj na seznamu. V\u010dasih je enostavno treba blokirati npr. ra\u010dunalni\u0161ko u\u010dilnico v osnovni \u0161oli ali kaj podobnega. Sem odblokiral naslov, ki je bil najbli\u017ee tvojemu, poskusi \u0161e enkrat s prijavo, \u010de ne bo \u0161lo, mi pa sporo\u010di. LP --''' +++$+++ :Verjetno je prišlo do tega slučajno ob blokadi celega niza IP-jev, s katerih je prihajal vandalizem, pa je bil po nesreči tudi tvoj na seznamu. Včasih je enostavno treba blokirati npr. računalniško učilnico v osnovni šoli ali kaj podobnega. Sem odblokiral naslov, ki je bil najbliže tvojemu, poskusi še enkrat s prijavo, če ne bo šlo, mi pa sporoči. LP --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 09:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

524024 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-28 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.185621660E09 +++$+++ Hi there, I've reverted that change, as the version they examined was the old draft before our internal peer-review and the FA process. The newspaper article is therefore completely out of date. All the best  +++$+++ Hi there, I've reverted that change, as the version they examined was the old draft before our internal peer-review and the FA process. The newspaper article is therefore completely out of date. All the best [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 04:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
524025 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524024 +++$+++ 524024 +++$+++ 2007-07-28 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.185623100E09 +++$+++ and others - why should this link be removed? It's a useful and interesting bit of article history, that a reasonably well known newspaper took the effort to take this article and get it reviewed by and experienced university professor, and that he liked it. -- +++$+++ : and others - why should this link be removed? It's a useful and interesting bit of article history, that a reasonably well known newspaper took the effort to take this article and get it reviewed by and experienced university professor, and that he liked it. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 04:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
524026 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524024 +++$+++ 524025 +++$+++ 2007-07-28 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.185660600E09 +++$+++ Yes, but to me the way the new version read was like these were things that needed fixed with the current article, rather than things that were fixed in response to the review. Maybe just my point of view, since it was this review that prompted my drive to bring the article back to FA.  +++$+++ ::Yes, but to me the way the new version read was like these were things that needed fixed with the current article, rather than things that were fixed in response to the review. Maybe just my point of view, since it was this review that prompted my drive to bring the article back to FA. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 15:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
524027 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524024 +++$+++ 524026 +++$+++ 2007-07-28 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.185669600E09 +++$+++ Ah. I think I put in the date wrong in the template, I wrote June, but it was actually either April 30 or May 1. Here, let me put it back with the correct date, and an explicit note that this was a pre-FA review. -- +++$+++ ::: Ah. I think I put in the date wrong in the template, I wrote June, but it was actually either April 30 or May 1. Here, let me put it back with the correct date, and an explicit note that this was a pre-FA review. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
524028 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524024 +++$+++ 524026 +++$+++ 2007-07-28 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.185669720E09 +++$+++ Better? -- +++$+++ ::: Better? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
524029 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524024 +++$+++ 524025 +++$+++ 2007-07-28 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.185670440E09 +++$+++ Great! Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Great! Thanks. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 17:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

8462 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-22 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.285144560E09 +++$+++ I fixed all the problems you outlined and more. So please be fair and just and re-assess your opinion. If you fix the issues I would indeed change my opinion on your page as well, as I wrote.-- +++$+++ I fixed all the problems you outlined and more. So please be fair and just and re-assess your opinion. If you fix the issues I would indeed change my opinion on your page as well, as I wrote.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  01:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
8463 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8462 +++$+++ 8462 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.285203420E09 +++$+++ If I were to act fairly to your FLC, like I originally intended, would you do the same to mine? Or leave me hanging?-- +++$+++ :If I were to act fairly to your FLC, like I originally intended, would you do the same to mine? Or leave me hanging?--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  17:57, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
8464 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8462 +++$+++ 8463 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.285222500E09 +++$+++ Hi, please check back at the page for further comments :)-- +++$+++ ::Hi, please check back at the page for further comments :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  23:15, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
8465 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8462 +++$+++ 8464 +++$+++ 2010-09-25 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.285409280E09 +++$+++ Hey Max, so thanks for your help. I really don't know where you find some of these things but thank you! I think I fixed everything, so please take a look and re-assess you opinion.-- +++$+++ :::Hey Max, so thanks for your help. I really don't know where you find some of these things but thank you! I think I fixed everything, so please take a look and re-assess you opinion.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  03:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
8466 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8462 +++$+++ 8465 +++$+++ 2010-09-26 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.285484520E09 +++$+++ Hehehe, I'm starting to wonder that myself! Either that or you have connections at the ARIA and CRIA ;). Anyway, thanks for the help and I now believe everything to have been solved. :)-- +++$+++ ::::Hehehe, I'm starting to wonder that myself! Either that or you have connections at the ARIA and CRIA ;). Anyway, thanks for the help and I now believe everything to have been solved. :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  00:02, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

270608 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270608 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-05 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.249486680E09 +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse, if you are no longer directly involved in DYK (I don't want to involve you in any conflict of interests), could you please have a look at [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Phylactolaemata]] and suggest any improvements you can think of. -- +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse, if you are no longer directly involved in DYK (I don't want to involve you in any conflict of interests), could you please have a look at [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Phylactolaemata]] and suggest any improvements you can think of. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 08:38, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
270609 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270608 +++$+++ 270608 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.249589520E09 +++$+++ Hey Philcha, I added some '''alt''' hooks. See what you can do with them. You might what to modify them. Regards. &mdash; +++$+++ :Hey Philcha, I added some '''alt''' hooks. See what you can do with them. You might what to modify them. Regards. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
270610 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270608 +++$+++ 270608 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.249590420E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Mattisse. I just found your \"buffet\" and have suggested a [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_August_3 | smorgasbord version}}. What do you think? -- +++$+++ :Thanks, Mattisse. I just found your "buffet" and have suggested a [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_August_3 | smorgasbord version}}. What do you think? --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 13:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
270611 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270608 +++$+++ 270610 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.249591200E09 +++$+++ I'm thinking that it should either be \"produced\" and \"survived\" or \"produces\" and \"survives\". &mdash; +++$+++ ::I'm thinking that it should either be "produced" and "survived" or "produces" and "survives". &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
270612 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270608 +++$+++ 270611 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.249598640E09 +++$+++ What do you think? -- +++$+++ :::What do you think? --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 15:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
270613 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270608 +++$+++ 270612 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.249599060E09 +++$+++ It's not a big deal. I noted it on the DYK page. If someone thinks it is important enough they will probably fix it, or at least mention it.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::It's not a big deal. I noted it on the DYK page. If someone thinks it is important enough they will probably fix it, or at least mention it.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

532753 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-08 07:31:00 +++$+++ 1.178634660E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'd be glad to help you with advices. So if you have any questions, feel free to ask. However, my schedule is a bit hectic these days so it may take a day or two for me to answer. Best regards, --''' +++$+++ Hi. I'd be glad to help you with advices. So if you have any questions, feel free to ask. However, my schedule is a bit hectic these days so it may take a day or two for me to answer. Best regards, --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 07:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
532754 +++$+++ Shoessss +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532753 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.178649000E09 +++$+++ Thank you...I do appreciate the help. Probably the first question would be; in reviewing my edit history, what area do you think I should work on before applying for Administration privileges.  As you will probably note, I have worked and been a major contributor on several larger articles.  However, a majority of my time is spent working on new articles to review for deletion.  Any suggestions?  Once again, thanks for the help.  Have a great day.  +++$+++ ::Thank you...I do appreciate the help. Probably the first question would be; in reviewing my edit history, what area do you think I should work on before applying for Administration privileges.  As you will probably note, I have worked and been a major contributor on several larger articles.  However, a majority of my time is spent working on new articles to review for deletion.  Any suggestions?  Once again, thanks for the help.  Have a great day. [[User:Shoessss|Shoessss]] 11:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

8467 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-26 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.285553220E09 +++$+++ '''Done'''-- +++$+++ '''Done'''--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  19:07, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
8468 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8467 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-28 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.285678140E09 +++$+++ Back again :). Done and ready for possible Support hehe, I hope. Thanks!-- +++$+++ ::Back again :). Done and ready for possible Support hehe, I hope. Thanks!--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  05:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
8469 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8467 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.285808820E09 +++$+++ I reverted. I didn't realize they were all 150, it just looked so wide in comparison to the others and its alignment. Anyways, can you please report back to the FLC as soon as possible? Thanks.-- +++$+++ :::I reverted. I didn't realize they were all 150, it just looked so wide in comparison to the others and its alignment. Anyways, can you please report back to the FLC as soon as possible? Thanks.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  18:07, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
8470 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8467 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.285811460E09 +++$+++ Hi, so I guess it is a live album, I mean the whole album was recorded at a live show, so yea I guess. I agree sorta, I'll change it.-- +++$+++ ::::Hi, so I guess it is a live album, I mean the whole album was recorded at a live show, so yea I guess. I agree sorta, I'll change it.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  18:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
8471 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8467 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.285812360E09 +++$+++ '''Fixed'''-- +++$+++ :::::'''Fixed'''--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  19:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

569390 +++$+++ Kchase02 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-15 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.166235600E09 +++$+++ Aeropagitica, if you get a chance, could you review my block of [[Special:Contributions\/204.39.48.8|this IP]]. I tripled the last block of one month, but it's a school IP, so I'm not sure that's appropriate. You can reply here. Thanks!-- +++$+++ Aeropagitica, if you get a chance, could you review my block of [[Special:Contributions/204.39.48.8|this IP]]. I tripled the last block of one month, but it's a school IP, so I'm not sure that's appropriate. You can reply here. Thanks!--[[User:Kchase02|Kchase]] [[User_talk:Kchase02|T]] 18:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
569391 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569390 +++$+++ 569390 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.166236920E09 +++$+++ Hello! I have looked at the IP address and it is originating from the Detroit area, so I have tagged the IP's Talk page with a box to this effect.  As it is a school IP address, I would make the block soft and allow accounts to be created and registered users to log on to edit.  We do have schoolchildren who make effective contributions to WP and there is no reason to deny their legitimate use of WP.  I have been caught out by this before and changed my blocks upon appeal.  I don't have a problem with the escalating duration of the blocks due to vandalism but no one wants to accidentally block legitimate editors. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello! I have looked at the IP address and it is originating from the Detroit area, so I have tagged the IP's Talk page with a box to this effect.  As it is a school IP address, I would make the block soft and allow accounts to be created and registered users to log on to edit.  We do have schoolchildren who make effective contributions to WP and there is no reason to deny their legitimate use of WP.  I have been caught out by this before and changed my blocks upon appeal.  I don't have a problem with the escalating duration of the blocks due to vandalism but no one wants to accidentally block legitimate editors. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 18:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

270614 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-06 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.249626840E09 +++$+++ Please stop from doing this without explaining exactly ''why'' the parameters automatically make a reference a self-reference. And don't do it on random articles; that's [[WP:POINT|disruption to make a point]]. Do it on [[Template talk:Cite episode]]. ''' +++$+++ Please stop from doing this without explaining exactly ''why'' the parameters automatically make a reference a self-reference. And don't do it on random articles; that's [[WP:POINT|disruption to make a point]]. Do it on [[Template talk:Cite episode]]. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 23:34, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
270615 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270614 +++$+++ 270614 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.249627140E09 +++$+++ The reason I removed them is because they lead to nonexistent wikipedia pages. The pages do not exist. There should not be false links in the references.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :The reason I removed them is because they lead to nonexistent wikipedia pages. The pages do not exist. There should not be false links in the references.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
270616 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270614 +++$+++ 270615 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.249627740E09 +++$+++ Because someone has been messing with the template code, not because they were deliberately put there. ''' +++$+++ ::Because someone has been messing with the template code, not because they were deliberately put there. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 23:49, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
270617 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270614 +++$+++ 270616 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.249627920E09 +++$+++ Is that an important distinction? -- +++$+++ :::Is that an important distinction? --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
270618 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270614 +++$+++ 270617 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.249628160E09 +++$+++ The links to the real wikipedia articles still work. Just the ones that do not exist - the episodelink  - are removed. Besides, a reference to another wikipedia article is not a real reference. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::The links to the real wikipedia articles still work. Just the ones that do not exist - the episodelink  - are removed. Besides, a reference to another wikipedia article is not a real reference. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
270619 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270614 +++$+++ 270618 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.249628400E09 +++$+++ '''The episodelink parameter does not even imply a reference to Wikipedia'''. It's never even appeared in the source-checking for multiple FACs. It's like saying that linking to a book article in {{tl|cite book}} makes ''that'' a Wikipedia reference too (it doesn't). ''' +++$+++ :::::'''The episodelink parameter does not even imply a reference to Wikipedia'''. It's never even appeared in the source-checking for multiple FACs. It's like saying that linking to a book article in {{tl|cite book}} makes ''that'' a Wikipedia reference too (it doesn't). '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 00:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
270620 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270614 +++$+++ 270619 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.249628640E09 +++$+++ But the links to the episodes are still there. The only difference is that they no longer look like an external link. Looking like an external link to go to another wikipedia article is misleading.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::But the links to the episodes are still there. The only difference is that they no longer look like an external link. Looking like an external link to go to another wikipedia article is misleading.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:04, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
270621 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270614 +++$+++ 270620 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.249630140E09 +++$+++ Should be settled now, just need to wait for the template changes to propogate. ''' +++$+++ :::::::Should be settled now, just need to wait for the template changes to propogate. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 00:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

8472 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8472 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-29 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.285815000E09 +++$+++ Thanks Max, I will change that as well. Can you do me a favor? Now that you support, can you change the bold ''Oppose'' to ''Support'', simply because I fear your change of decision will go by unnoticed. Thank you :)-- +++$+++ Thanks Max, I will change that as well. Can you do me a favor? Now that you support, can you change the bold ''Oppose'' to ''Support'', simply because I fear your change of decision will go by unnoticed. Thank you :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  19:50, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
8473 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8472 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.285816620E09 +++$+++ Thank you Max :). I was wondering if you could answer a question. I heard a Celine Dion audio (I have on my Ipod) of her singing \"Everything I Do (I Do It For You)\" I'm guessing alongside Bryan Adams. Do you know what year and TV show it was on? Judging from her vocals, I would say its for sure after 1996-97, probably 98-99 or so. Thanks!-- +++$+++ ::Thank you Max :). I was wondering if you could answer a question. I heard a Celine Dion audio (I have on my Ipod) of her singing "Everything I Do (I Do It For You)" I'm guessing alongside Bryan Adams. Do you know what year and TV show it was on? Judging from her vocals, I would say its for sure after 1996-97, probably 98-99 or so. Thanks!--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  20:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
8474 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8472 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.285817520E09 +++$+++ Aha! Thank you, I knew it was around there. With Celine, Whitney and Mariah I can tell pretty accurately what year from their voice. There is a change in almost every year :)-- +++$+++ :::Aha! Thank you, I knew it was around there. With Celine, Whitney and Mariah I can tell pretty accurately what year from their voice. There is a change in almost every year :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  20:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
8475 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8472 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.285818120E09 +++$+++ Lol, well I'm always open to and interested in new information! :). That would be great.-- +++$+++ ::::Lol, well I'm always open to and interested in new information! :). That would be great.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  20:42, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

532761 +++$+++ Shoessss +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-14 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.179175380E09 +++$+++ Hey [[User:tone|Tone]] got my second question\/request for advice.  Just ran a cross a situation where I have an editor that is just an out right bigot.  While reverting some edits he\/she made I noticed their username could be taken as racist, depending on your point of view.  What is the best way to handle this situation?  Thanks for your help  +++$+++ Hey [[User:tone|Tone]] got my second question/request for advice.  Just ran a cross a situation where I have an editor that is just an out right bigot.  While reverting some edits he/she made I noticed their username could be taken as racist, depending on your point of view.  What is the best way to handle this situation?  Thanks for your help [[User:Shoessss|Shoessss]] 13:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
532762 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532761 +++$+++ 532761 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.179176280E09 +++$+++ This one is a bit tricky. Which user do you have in mind? If a username is straightaway racist, the user probably gets a permanent block at the very beginning. But sometimes it is hard to judge. If you spot a user who is problematic, you should first contact him and try to reach a consensus. If this doesn't work and you are considering a block, the best solution is to report the user to the administrator's noticeboard so a third party can have a look at the situation and perform a block if needed. IMO, it is always better to ask another admin for a block if you are involved in a dispute. I hope I answered you. --''' +++$+++ : This one is a bit tricky. Which user do you have in mind? If a username is straightaway racist, the user probably gets a permanent block at the very beginning. But sometimes it is hard to judge. If you spot a user who is problematic, you should first contact him and try to reach a consensus. If this doesn't work and you are considering a block, the best solution is to report the user to the administrator's noticeboard so a third party can have a look at the situation and perform a block if needed. IMO, it is always better to ask another admin for a block if you are involved in a dispute. I hope I answered you. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 13:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
532763 +++$+++ Shoessss +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532761 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.179176460E09 +++$+++ Thanks guy!! Yes you did.  Appreciate your help.  By the way, not an Adminstator yet!  Holding off for a little while before applying. Just to make sure I put my best foot forward. Have a great day.  +++$+++ :::Thanks guy!! Yes you did.  Appreciate your help.  By the way, not an Adminstator yet!  Holding off for a little while before applying. Just to make sure I put my best foot forward. Have a great day. [[User:Shoessss|Shoessss]] 14:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

45103 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Cybervoron +++$+++ 45103 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-26 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.264565640E09 +++$+++ A question, why is testing so important that it justifies such a large table? While in March it may have been the only interesting thing to have happened in the series, it should be born in mind that these articles should be written towards how they should look at the end of the season. The important part of a motor racing season article is the races. Testing does not contribute significantly towards the results of the season. It's coverage in a season article should reflect its' importance. Two or three sentences should suffice for the whole of pre-season testing. -- +++$+++ A question, why is testing so important that it justifies such a large table? While in March it may have been the only interesting thing to have happened in the series, it should be born in mind that these articles should be written towards how they should look at the end of the season. The important part of a motor racing season article is the races. Testing does not contribute significantly towards the results of the season. It's coverage in a season article should reflect its' importance. Two or three sentences should suffice for the whole of pre-season testing. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore|talk]]) 20:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45104 +++$+++ Cybervoron +++$+++ Cybervoron +++$+++ 45103 +++$+++ 45103 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.264566420E09 +++$+++ Simply because information about the tests over time is difficult to find (try to find information on all the test leaders of the 2005 GP2 Series season), but here in wikipedia all in one article. And this information is fully relevant to the article of the season, albeit not as important as in Formula One.  +++$+++ * Simply because information about the tests over time is difficult to find (try to find information on all the test leaders of the 2005 GP2 Series season), but here in wikipedia all in one article. And this information is fully relevant to the article of the season, albeit not as important as in Formula One. [[User:Cybervoron|Cybervoron]] ([[User talk:Cybervoron#top|talk]]) 20:27, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45105 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Cybervoron +++$+++ 45103 +++$+++ 45104 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.264566600E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia is not the place to create your own personal statistics database. [[WP:NOTSTATS]]. -- +++$+++ ::Wikipedia is not the place to create your own personal statistics database. [[WP:NOTSTATS]]. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore|talk]]) 20:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45106 +++$+++ Cybervoron +++$+++ Cybervoron +++$+++ 45103 +++$+++ 45105 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.264567140E09 +++$+++ You had too one-sided look at these rules and I'm not saying that this should only me.  +++$+++ :::You had too one-sided look at these rules and I'm not saying that this should only me. [[User:Cybervoron|Cybervoron]] ([[User talk:Cybervoron#top|talk]]) 20:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45107 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Cybervoron +++$+++ 45103 +++$+++ 45106 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.264568640E09 +++$+++ On the contrary, there was a discussion recently on testing's inclusion in formula one articles, which embarrassingly I cannot find quickly, of which consensus was to reduce and de-tabulate testing coverage. -- +++$+++ ::::On the contrary, there was a discussion recently on testing's inclusion in formula one articles, which embarrassingly I cannot find quickly, of which consensus was to reduce and de-tabulate testing coverage. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore|talk]]) 21:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45108 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Cybervoron +++$+++ 45103 +++$+++ 45106 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.264568940E09 +++$+++ Additionally other than saying it is 'fully relevant' you've not done much to demonstrate its notability. I does not contribute to points. It does not contribute to event qualifying, and while a good test may contribute to preparation prior to an event, so do technical changes at the factory, and fitness training of the drivers, neither of which get much coverage in season articles. Are testing times include in Olympic event coverage on wikipedia? -- +++$+++ ::::Additionally other than saying it is 'fully relevant' you've not done much to demonstrate its notability. I does not contribute to points. It does not contribute to event qualifying, and while a good test may contribute to preparation prior to an event, so do technical changes at the factory, and fitness training of the drivers, neither of which get much coverage in season articles. Are testing times include in Olympic event coverage on wikipedia? --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore|talk]]) 21:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45109 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Cybervoron +++$+++ 45103 +++$+++ 45106 +++$+++ 2010-01-28 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.264675440E09 +++$+++ [[Talk:2010 Formula One season\/Archive 3#Pre-season testing|Found it]]. -- +++$+++ ::::[[Talk:2010 Formula One season/Archive 3#Pre-season testing|Found it]]. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore|talk]]) 02:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

532764 +++$+++ Shoessss +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-14 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.179207540E09 +++$+++ Hey [[User:tone|Tone]], I\u2019m sorry to drag you into this one, but can you mediate a situation that is going on at [[Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom murder]].  Appreciate your input on the situation.  I\u2019ll let you read the discussion page and decide the method of resolving the disagreement. +++$+++ Hey [[User:tone|Tone]], I’m sorry to drag you into this one, but can you mediate a situation that is going on at [[Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom murder]].  Appreciate your input on the situation.  I’ll let you read the discussion page and decide the method of resolving the disagreement.[[User:Shoessss|Shoessss]] 22:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
532765 +++$+++ Shoessss +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532764 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.179209400E09 +++$+++ P.S.  Never thought I be this much a pain in the butt\u2026\u2026did ya.  +++$+++ ::::P.S.  Never thought I be this much a pain in the butt……did ya. [[User:Shoessss|Shoessss]] 23:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

8477 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-29 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.285819740E09 +++$+++ Wow! Thanks Max, thats really cool. Is that source able to include in an article? Also, are those sales from Oricon or Billboard\/Shimbun, because Oricon sales are lower for some reason. #1's was listed by Billboard as having sold 3.25 in Japan (1M the first week) only 3 months after its release. However, Oricon lists the sales at only 2.8 million. I'm looking for Billboard\/Shimbun sales, which I have for a few of the albums, (check the discography) but not for some :(. Also, I thought ''Mariah Carey'' was certified the \"Million Award\"? Thats what you posted on my talk page like 6 months ago. Thanks Max this info is really cool!-- +++$+++ Wow! Thanks Max, thats really cool. Is that source able to include in an article? Also, are those sales from Oricon or Billboard/Shimbun, because Oricon sales are lower for some reason. #1's was listed by Billboard as having sold 3.25 in Japan (1M the first week) only 3 months after its release. However, Oricon lists the sales at only 2.8 million. I'm looking for Billboard/Shimbun sales, which I have for a few of the albums, (check the discography) but not for some :(. Also, I thought ''Mariah Carey'' was certified the "Million Award"? Thats what you posted on my talk page like 6 months ago. Thanks Max this info is really cool!--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  21:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
8478 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8477 +++$+++ 8477 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.285821660E09 +++$+++ Thanks Max, this is really interesting and good info! I'm really surprised at how detailed it is!. But yes, the sales match Oricon, as \"Music Box\" is listed by Oricon as having sold 1.58 million.-- +++$+++ :Thanks Max, this is really interesting and good info! I'm really surprised at how detailed it is!. But yes, the sales match Oricon, as "Music Box" is listed by Oricon as having sold 1.58 million.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  21:41, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
8479 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8477 +++$+++ 8478 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.285827120E09 +++$+++ Hehehe, well I guess its our history that leads people to believe that. And also, no matter what you think, I also really like Celine, shes my second fave :D. Thanks you for all this information Max! This is really cool, I have no clue how the heck you find all this stuff! lol. What are Celines Oricon sales for \"All The Way\"? I know its certified 2x Million, but I doubt the sales reach that. Anyways, thank you for your help in the FLC and the Japanese sales, I'm starting to think your from Japan not Poland :p. When you nominate the singles discography, I'll take a look and if its good (it looks good already!) I'll glady suppoert! :)-- +++$+++ ::Hehehe, well I guess its our history that leads people to believe that. And also, no matter what you think, I also really like Celine, shes my second fave :D. Thanks you for all this information Max! This is really cool, I have no clue how the heck you find all this stuff! lol. What are Celines Oricon sales for "All The Way"? I know its certified 2x Million, but I doubt the sales reach that. Anyways, thank you for your help in the FLC and the Japanese sales, I'm starting to think your from Japan not Poland :p. When you nominate the singles discography, I'll take a look and if its good (it looks good already!) I'll glady suppoert! :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  23:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
8480 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8477 +++$+++ 8479 +++$+++ 2010-09-30 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.285916340E09 +++$+++ Hiya Max. Wow, where dd you get all this information from? Is it available for Wikipedia use? Also, yes I see they are Oricon sales, becaus Billboard\/Shimbun clamed #1's sales at over 3.25 million coopies after only 3 months after its release. Look [http:\/\/books.google.co.kr\/books?id=yg0EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA49&dq=bodyguard+top+foreign+album&lr=&as_brr=0&as_pt=MAGAZINES&cd=5#v=onepage&q=bodyguard%20top%20foreign%20album&f=false here] you will see them announcing #1's as the best-selling international album ever (beat the bodyguard) only 3 months after its release. This being so, I wonder how much the sales are now according to Billboard, I guess they must be about 4 million. Do you know how to find the Billboard\/Shimun sales of any of her albums, specifically \"Butterfly\"? Because I imagine then the sales must be like 1.5 million. As you see I have Billboard sales on like 4 of her albums, even thouigh they are from like 94-95 :(. Did you eever find worldwide sales for Rainbow or Butterfly? I have tried to find reliable ones for a whhile and never were able. Judgin from available certifications, \"Butterfly: has 5m in US, 1M in Europe, 1m in Japan and another 1m in other territoriues (canda, aus etc.) SO if they certifications equal 8M+, the sales must be around 13-15 ish. Doing the same thing, Rainbows equal around 10. ANyway, thanks for the information Max, its really informative!! Have you ever seen Celine or Mariah in concert? I saw Mariah last year and would love to see Celine, maybe I'll see her in Vegas soon :D-- +++$+++ :::Hiya Max. Wow, where dd you get all this information from? Is it available for Wikipedia use? Also, yes I see they are Oricon sales, becaus Billboard/Shimbun clamed #1's sales at over 3.25 million coopies after only 3 months after its release. Look [http://books.google.co.kr/books?id=yg0EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA49&dq=bodyguard+top+foreign+album&lr=&as_brr=0&as_pt=MAGAZINES&cd=5#v=onepage&q=bodyguard%20top%20foreign%20album&f=false here] you will see them announcing #1's as the best-selling international album ever (beat the bodyguard) only 3 months after its release. This being so, I wonder how much the sales are now according to Billboard, I guess they must be about 4 million. Do you know how to find the Billboard/Shimun sales of any of her albums, specifically "Butterfly"? Because I imagine then the sales must be like 1.5 million. As you see I have Billboard sales on like 4 of her albums, even thouigh they are from like 94-95 :(. Did you eever find worldwide sales for Rainbow or Butterfly? I have tried to find reliable ones for a whhile and never were able. Judgin from available certifications, "Butterfly: has 5m in US, 1M in Europe, 1m in Japan and another 1m in other territoriues (canda, aus etc.) SO if they certifications equal 8M+, the sales must be around 13-15 ish. Doing the same thing, Rainbows equal around 10. ANyway, thanks for the information Max, its really informative!! Have you ever seen Celine or Mariah in concert? I saw Mariah last year and would love to see Celine, maybe I'll see her in Vegas soon :D--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  23:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
8481 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8477 +++$+++ 8480 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.286090340E09 +++$+++ Yes, I really like \"Oh Santa\" its really cute and fun, its obviously not AIWFCIY, but its really festive, I cant wait for the big ballads and classsical covers! :D-- +++$+++ ::::Yes, I really like "Oh Santa" its really cute and fun, its obviously not AIWFCIY, but its really festive, I cant wait for the big ballads and classsical covers! :D--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  00:19, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

270622 +++$+++ Madcoverboy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-28 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.248837720E09 +++$+++ I'm in the midst of attempting to address the points you raised in the [[Talk:Francis Amasa Walker\/GA1|GA review]], but I'm really struggling with how to summarize for the lead. I wanted to inquire if you wanted to attempt a summary or perhaps point me to another GA or FA to use as a template to summarize a man with such multi-faceted and diverse interests.  +++$+++ I'm in the midst of attempting to address the points you raised in the [[Talk:Francis Amasa Walker/GA1|GA review]], but I'm really struggling with how to summarize for the lead. I wanted to inquire if you wanted to attempt a summary or perhaps point me to another GA or FA to use as a template to summarize a man with such multi-faceted and diverse interests. [[User:Madcoverboy|Madcoverboy]] ([[User talk:Madcoverboy|talk]]) 20:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
270623 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270622 +++$+++ 270622 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.248838980E09 +++$+++ Hope this helps. Feel free to ask me more questions. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Hope this helps. Feel free to ask me more questions. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:43, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
270624 +++$+++ Madcoverboy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270622 +++$+++ 270623 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.249428000E09 +++$+++ I've rewritten the lead. I fear it may be too long, but it can always be summarized. Hopefully this is sufficient for GA and beyond! :)  +++$+++ :: I've rewritten the lead. I fear it may be too long, but it can always be summarized. Hopefully this is sufficient for GA and beyond! :) [[User:Madcoverboy|Madcoverboy]] ([[User talk:Madcoverboy|talk]]) 16:20, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
270625 +++$+++ Madcoverboy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270622 +++$+++ 270624 +++$+++ 2009-08-08 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.249725360E09 +++$+++ Cheers, thanks for your feedback and attention!  +++$+++ ::: Cheers, thanks for your feedback and attention! [[User:Madcoverboy|Madcoverboy]] ([[User talk:Madcoverboy|talk]]) 02:56, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

611315 +++$+++ Victuallers +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-03 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.294117320E09 +++$+++ }}  Thanks for this article  +++$+++ }}  Thanks for this article [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 21:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
611316 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611315 +++$+++ 611315 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.294239840E09 +++$+++ It would really help at this point if you had independent news sources so that you could back up the award a bit. Otherwise the article is pretty solid.  +++$+++ :It would really help at this point if you had independent news sources so that you could back up the award a bit. Otherwise the article is pretty solid. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 07:04, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

532769 +++$+++ ToxicArtichoke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-22 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.179879720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:ToxicArtichoke|ToxicArtichoke]] 17:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
532770 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532769 +++$+++ 532769 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.180323360E09 +++$+++ Hi. The image was classified as a fair use image but it was not used in any articles. I can restore it so you can copy it on your disk but if you want it to stay on WP, you have to do something about the licence. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The image was classified as a fair use image but it was not used in any articles. I can restore it so you can copy it on your disk but if you want it to stay on WP, you have to do something about the licence. Regards, --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 20:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
532771 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532769 +++$+++ 532769 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.180323360E09 +++$+++ Hello. The article says that the company hasn't produced any video games yet. So there may be an obstacle regarding the notability criteria. If you could provide those, I think it should be ok. The same goes for the second article you asked. Regadrs, --''' +++$+++ : Hello. The article says that the company hasn't produced any video games yet. So there may be an obstacle regarding the notability criteria. If you could provide those, I think it should be ok. The same goes for the second article you asked. Regadrs, --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 20:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
532772 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532769 +++$+++ 532769 +++$+++ 2007-06-01 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.180706580E09 +++$+++ Ok, just wait for the release. Until then, the notice in the other article should suffice. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : Ok, just wait for the release. Until then, the notice in the other article should suffice. Regards, --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 07:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
532773 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532769 +++$+++ 532769 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.181142060E09 +++$+++ Well, when you add the references, you can also remove the template yourself :-) I trimmed the style a bit and it should be fine now. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : Well, when you add the references, you can also remove the template yourself :-) I trimmed the style a bit and it should be fine now. Regards, --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 08:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

8482 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-04 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.286257680E09 +++$+++ Hi Max, I fixed everything. Check back. Thanks :)-- +++$+++ Hi Max, I fixed everything. Check back. Thanks :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  22:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
8483 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8482 +++$+++ 8482 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.286359740E09 +++$+++ Other than that, everything is perfecto! :D-- +++$+++ :Other than that, everything is perfecto! :D--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  03:09, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
8484 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8482 +++$+++ 8483 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.286406180E09 +++$+++ Finished :D. Check back please :). Also Max, if your going for two weeks, what will be if there are any issues with Celine's FLC's? Well I can promise you that I will watch them and treat them like MC's when your gone, and if there are any problems found by other editors, I will do my very best to fix it and get it through! :D-- +++$+++ ::Finished :D. Check back please :). Also Max, if your going for two weeks, what will be if there are any issues with Celine's FLC's? Well I can promise you that I will watch them and treat them like MC's when your gone, and if there are any problems found by other editors, I will do my very best to fix it and get it through! :D--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  16:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
8485 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8482 +++$+++ 8484 +++$+++ 2010-10-07 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.286463540E09 +++$+++ '''Complete!''' :)-- +++$+++ :::'''Complete!''' :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  07:59, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
8486 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8482 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-10-07 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.286465760E09 +++$+++ Hey. So honestly I don't. I can't find them in Billboard, or any other site. If you like I could remove it, they aren't significant. If not the I guess we can just leave them there.-- +++$+++ :::::Hey. So honestly I don't. I can't find them in Billboard, or any other site. If you like I could remove it, they aren't significant. If not the I guess we can just leave them there.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  08:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

532774 +++$+++ Rghoward +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.180676280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Rghoward|Rghoward]] 22:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
532775 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532774 +++$+++ 532774 +++$+++ 2007-06-01 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.180706580E09 +++$+++ Hi. The thing that was missing in the article was assertion of notability. Please see [[WP:CORP]] and try to meet the criteria. I hope it helps, you can also ask me, if you need more help. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The thing that was missing in the article was assertion of notability. Please see [[WP:CORP]] and try to meet the criteria. I hope it helps, you can also ask me, if you need more help. Regards, --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 07:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
532776 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532774 +++$+++ 532774 +++$+++ 2007-06-01 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.180706580E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. The deletion was a bit too fast, sorry. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. The deletion was a bit too fast, sorry. Regards, --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 07:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

8488 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-31 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.288521900E09 +++$+++ I was wondering if you had a source for AIWFCIY being one of the best-selling singles by a non-Asian female? I thought it was in one of my Billboard magazine sources but its not :S. Have you heard MCIIY? Its Amazing!! :D-- +++$+++ I was wondering if you had a source for AIWFCIY being one of the best-selling singles by a non-Asian female? I thought it was in one of my Billboard magazine sources but its not :S. Have you heard MCIIY? Its Amazing!! :D--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  03:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
8489 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8488 +++$+++ 8488 +++$+++ 2010-11-01 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.288651140E09 +++$+++ Yes I love it, I honestly didn't expect the vocals to be as good, judging from ''Memoirs'' but I'm happy. Yeah, I thought I saw it once but I guess not :\/. Nice, these SoundScan figures are interesting! Its cool to see their albums sell well each year, I have a hunch that due to her upcoming Xmas specials and promotion, her old album will also be booming, just a hunch ;). Have you heard about Nelson and Eddy? :)-- +++$+++ :Yes I love it, I honestly didn't expect the vocals to be as good, judging from ''Memoirs'' but I'm happy. Yeah, I thought I saw it once but I guess not :/. Nice, these SoundScan figures are interesting! Its cool to see their albums sell well each year, I have a hunch that due to her upcoming Xmas specials and promotion, her old album will also be booming, just a hunch ;). Have you heard about Nelson and Eddy? :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  15:39, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
8490 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8488 +++$+++ 8489 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.288828020E09 +++$+++ Hey Max. Here are [http:\/\/www.mediafire.com\/?qhxphmfmpjqbvew Celine Dion's Canadian Certifications] in an official CRIA document. There it is if you want to use it for anything :)-- +++$+++ ::Hey Max. Here are [http://www.mediafire.com/?qhxphmfmpjqbvew Celine Dion's Canadian Certifications] in an official CRIA document. There it is if you want to use it for anything :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  16:47, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

532777 +++$+++ Cnota +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-01 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.180758180E09 +++$+++ Hi, I saw the tag on it this morning, threw a hangon tag at the top and it was deleted just a few hours later. Are all groups supposed to be deleted? If so everything under Category:Film critics association should be deleted and it would seem that would have already been done... Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, I saw the tag on it this morning, threw a hangon tag at the top and it was deleted just a few hours later. Are all groups supposed to be deleted? If so everything under Category:Film critics association should be deleted and it would seem that would have already been done... Thanks. [[User:Cnota|Cnota]] 21:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
532778 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532777 +++$+++ 532777 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.180794420E09 +++$+++ I see this article was deleted once before after tagged as prod. To get a consensus, I suggest you nominate it at the deletion review. I don't oppose restoring it but I would prefer have some more opinions. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : I see this article was deleted once before after tagged as prod. To get a consensus, I suggest you nominate it at the deletion review. I don't oppose restoring it but I would prefer have some more opinions. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 07:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

532779 +++$+++ Neil +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532779 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-03 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.180929360E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone.  Not sure if you realised, but this article had been \"kept\" at an AFD before, so wasn't eligible for speedy deletion.  I've edited out the blatant advertising now anyway (I wish more people would do that instead of tagging them with db-spam ...), so it should be ok.  Best,  +++$+++ Hi Tone.  Not sure if you realised, but this article had been "kept" at an AFD before, so wasn't eligible for speedy deletion.  I've edited out the blatant advertising now anyway (I wish more people would do that instead of tagging them with db-spam ...), so it should be ok.  Best, [[User:Neil|<span style="text-decoration:none; font-family: cursive ;color: #006600">Neil</span>]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Neil|<span style="text-decoration:none; color: #006600"><big>╦</big></span>]] 20:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
532780 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532779 +++$+++ 532779 +++$+++ 2007-06-03 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.180929660E09 +++$+++ Yeah, sometimes it's hard to judge all the details... Indeed, it's ok now and I think I have enough deletions for a while. Deleting too many things in one day makes the judgement a bit blurry... Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Yeah, sometimes it's hard to judge all the details... Indeed, it's ok now and I think I have enough deletions for a while. Deleting too many things in one day makes the judgement a bit blurry... Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 21:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

8493 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-13 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.292310540E09 +++$+++ Heya :) Please help reach consensus [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Merry_Christmas_(Mariah_Carey_album)#New_Claim here]. Its an easy vote, so don't get discouraged.-- +++$+++ Heya :) Please help reach consensus [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Merry_Christmas_(Mariah_Carey_album)#New_Claim here]. Its an easy vote, so don't get discouraged.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  23:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
8494 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8493 +++$+++ 8493 +++$+++ 2010-12-14 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.292327340E09 +++$+++ Hey. So we have unanymous consensus to my claim. Check out the results. Hope everythings good with you :)-- +++$+++ :Hey. So we have unanymous consensus to my claim. Check out the results. Hope everythings good with you :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  03:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

8495 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-14 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.292384100E09 +++$+++ Check this [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council\/Proposals\/Mariah Carey|out]] :)-- +++$+++ Check this [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Mariah Carey|out]] :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  19:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
8496 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8495 +++$+++ 8495 +++$+++ 2010-12-15 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.292473680E09 +++$+++ Hiya Max, nice to hear from you. So, honestly I disagree. Elvis' album shipped 12 million in the US, we have sales listed at around 9 million, so you see its not exact. As for Carey-Dion, Carey's certifications\/sales equal more. 5 (US) + 1-2 (EU) + 2.5 (JAP) + 480k (AUS)(CAN sales). Thats 9-10M in shipped\/sales. Dion is 5 (US) + 1-2 (EU) + 1 (CAN) + 400K (JAP). Thats 7.4-8.4 As you see, Carey's has indeed shipped\/sold more. Anyways, yes its upsetting because Mariah has done little promo for the album :( I expected a full world promo tour like she did for ''Memoirs'', but she has barely done anything. (Rockafeller & Special). At least it will make it to Gold, and surpass Memoirs I'm pretty sure! Yes that is frustrating! Yes I will ask him that. Do you have a Celine album you'd like some sales on? :) Well the Wikiproject in all honesty doesn't accomplish anything, lol its just a way to keep track of her GA\/FA stuff, you know. I already have developed quite a few Carey stuff, look at my page to see which ones! BTW, did you see her sing \"Imagine\" on Larry King? :) She obviously wasn't giving her all, but it reminded me of the 92-93 Leno performance of it :D-- +++$+++ :Hiya Max, nice to hear from you. So, honestly I disagree. Elvis' album shipped 12 million in the US, we have sales listed at around 9 million, so you see its not exact. As for Carey-Dion, Carey's certifications/sales equal more. 5 (US) + 1-2 (EU) + 2.5 (JAP) + 480k (AUS)(CAN sales). Thats 9-10M in shipped/sales. Dion is 5 (US) + 1-2 (EU) + 1 (CAN) + 400K (JAP). Thats 7.4-8.4 As you see, Carey's has indeed shipped/sold more. Anyways, yes its upsetting because Mariah has done little promo for the album :( I expected a full world promo tour like she did for ''Memoirs'', but she has barely done anything. (Rockafeller & Special). At least it will make it to Gold, and surpass Memoirs I'm pretty sure! Yes that is frustrating! Yes I will ask him that. Do you have a Celine album you'd like some sales on? :) Well the Wikiproject in all honesty doesn't accomplish anything, lol its just a way to keep track of her GA/FA stuff, you know. I already have developed quite a few Carey stuff, look at my page to see which ones! BTW, did you see her sing "Imagine" on Larry King? :) She obviously wasn't giving her all, but it reminded me of the 92-93 Leno performance of it :D--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  20:28, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
8497 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8495 +++$+++ 8496 +++$+++ 2010-12-15 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.292478900E09 +++$+++ Also Max, on a different subject. There is something '''very''' inconsistent with Dion's New Zealand certifications. Now, I've never seen the book, but you have and claim ''Music Box'' and ''Daydream'' are both 5x Platinum and Dion's ''FIY'' and ''LTAL'' are both 10x and 9x Platinum. Now, [http:\/\/charts.org.nz\/showitem.asp?interpret=Mariah+Carey&titel=Music+Box&cat=a here] we see ''Music Box'' peaked at #2 and spent 77 weeks in the chart, and is #20 on the [http:\/\/charts.org.nz\/showitem.asp?interpret=Mariah+Carey&titel=Daydream&cat=a \"all time chart\"]. Now ''Daydream'' peaked at #1 and spent only 49 weeks in the chart and is #252 on the all time chart. Big difference, I doubt they could share the same certification level. Now it gets really weird with Dion. ''FIY'' peaked at #1 and spent 76 weeks in the chart (1 less than MB) and is #19 on the [http:\/\/charts.org.nz\/showitem.asp?interpret=C%E9line+Dion&titel=Falling+Into+You&cat=a \"all time chart\"] (1 higher place than Carey. Now it in no way makes sense that her album should have sold double. Its absolutely impossible. Now look at ''LTAL'' which like ''Daydream'' was less successful. It peaked at #1 as well spending 50 weeks in the chart (1 more than Carey), however charting at #145 on the [http:\/\/charts.org.nz\/showitem.asp?interpret=C%E9line+Dion&titel=Let%27s+Talk+About+Love&cat=a \"all time chart\"]. Now the reason ''Daydream'' and ''LTAL'' are 100 spaces away is because Dion's spent 8 weeks at number 1, where Carey's spent 1. its understandable. Anyway, there must obviously be some flaw in the information provided in the past. Please comment :)-- +++$+++ ::Also Max, on a different subject. There is something '''very''' inconsistent with Dion's New Zealand certifications. Now, I've never seen the book, but you have and claim ''Music Box'' and ''Daydream'' are both 5x Platinum and Dion's ''FIY'' and ''LTAL'' are both 10x and 9x Platinum. Now, [http://charts.org.nz/showitem.asp?interpret=Mariah+Carey&titel=Music+Box&cat=a here] we see ''Music Box'' peaked at #2 and spent 77 weeks in the chart, and is #20 on the [http://charts.org.nz/showitem.asp?interpret=Mariah+Carey&titel=Daydream&cat=a "all time chart"]. Now ''Daydream'' peaked at #1 and spent only 49 weeks in the chart and is #252 on the all time chart. Big difference, I doubt they could share the same certification level. Now it gets really weird with Dion. ''FIY'' peaked at #1 and spent 76 weeks in the chart (1 less than MB) and is #19 on the [http://charts.org.nz/showitem.asp?interpret=C%E9line+Dion&titel=Falling+Into+You&cat=a "all time chart"] (1 higher place than Carey. Now it in no way makes sense that her album should have sold double. Its absolutely impossible. Now look at ''LTAL'' which like ''Daydream'' was less successful. It peaked at #1 as well spending 50 weeks in the chart (1 more than Carey), however charting at #145 on the [http://charts.org.nz/showitem.asp?interpret=C%E9line+Dion&titel=Let%27s+Talk+About+Love&cat=a "all time chart"]. Now the reason ''Daydream'' and ''LTAL'' are 100 spaces away is because Dion's spent 8 weeks at number 1, where Carey's spent 1. its understandable. Anyway, there must obviously be some flaw in the information provided in the past. Please comment :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  21:55, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
8498 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8495 +++$+++ 8497 +++$+++ 2010-12-19 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.292758920E09 +++$+++ I will, but I'm wondering where you got Celine's info from? Have you ever seen the book?-- +++$+++ :::I will, but I'm wondering where you got Celine's info from? Have you ever seen the book?--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  03:42, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

525704 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-22 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.216780320E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Particularly honoured by your well-chosen example :-). By the way, I think you have been insufficiently barnstarred for your simply ''awesome'' work on medical categorisation, infoboxing and otherwise badly neglected anatomy articles.  +++$+++ Thanks. Particularly honoured by your well-chosen example :-). By the way, I think you have been insufficiently barnstarred for your simply ''awesome'' work on medical categorisation, infoboxing and otherwise badly neglected anatomy articles. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 19:32, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
525705 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.216781040E09 +++$+++ Thank you! -- +++$+++ :::Thank you! --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 19:44, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

8500 +++$+++ Armbrust +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8500 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-23 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.295832660E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <font color=\"#082567\"> +++$+++ If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <font color="#082567">[[User:Armbrust|Armbrust]]</font> <sup><font color="#E3A857">[[User talk:Armbrust|Talk]]</font></sup> <sub><font color="#008000">[[Special:Contributions/Armbrust|Contribs]]</font></sub> 17:31, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
8501 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8500 +++$+++ 8500 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.296025320E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing![[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  23:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

532789 +++$+++ Tri400 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.181054160E09 +++$+++ Why the hell did u delete my page on Criminal MPs?  +++$+++ Why the hell did u delete my page on Criminal MPs? [[User:Tri400|Tri400]] 07:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
532790 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532789 +++$+++ 532789 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.181055120E09 +++$+++ The article was evry short, providing no sources and it was not clear what it was about. I invite you to rewrite it, at the moment, it was not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : The article was evry short, providing no sources and it was not clear what it was about. I invite you to rewrite it, at the moment, it was not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Regards, --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 07:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
532791 +++$+++ Tri400 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532789 +++$+++ 532790 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.181092020E09 +++$+++ I invite you to re-install that page. There was no need to remove it so dam quickly. It was a factual page with links within Wikipedia to [[Sibu Soren]] and [[Phoolan Devi]] etc. It was a page of an EXISTING CATEGORY Criminal-MPs.  +++$+++ :: I invite you to re-install that page. There was no need to remove it so dam quickly. It was a factual page with links within Wikipedia to [[Sibu Soren]] and [[Phoolan Devi]] etc. It was a page of an EXISTING CATEGORY Criminal-MPs. [[User:Tri400|Tri400]] 18:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
532792 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532789 +++$+++ 532791 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.181092500E09 +++$+++ There was no other content than links to other articles. If you are planning to add more content and most of all, provide sources, I am willing to restore the article. I am unfamiliar with the whole situation but check [[WP:ATTACK]]. This was the main reason the article got deleted in the first place. --''' +++$+++ ::: There was no other content than links to other articles. If you are planning to add more content and most of all, provide sources, I am willing to restore the article. I am unfamiliar with the whole situation but check [[WP:ATTACK]]. This was the main reason the article got deleted in the first place. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 18:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
532793 +++$+++ Tri400 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532789 +++$+++ 532791 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.181165460E09 +++$+++ If you are unfamiliar with the situation, as you said, then you had no right to remove the page. BTW Corruption is rampant in India and many other nations, but since the last few years the system has been getting cleaned up: [[Sibu Soren]] was the 1st ever Federal Parliamentarian in India to be found guilty of murder. This was a page to provide information on the extrodinary situation of having criminals winning local elections.  +++$+++ ::: If you are unfamiliar with the situation, as you said, then you had no right to remove the page. BTW Corruption is rampant in India and many other nations, but since the last few years the system has been getting cleaned up: [[Sibu Soren]] was the 1st ever Federal Parliamentarian in India to be found guilty of murder. This was a page to provide information on the extrodinary situation of having criminals winning local elections. [[User:Tri400|Tri400]] 14:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
532794 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532789 +++$+++ 532793 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.181180520E09 +++$+++ You can't say I have no right to remove an unsoursed page that can possibly be a personal attack. Of course, if you can provide the reference and expand the article, I won't complain at all. Regards. --''' +++$+++ :::: You can't say I have no right to remove an unsoursed page that can possibly be a personal attack. Of course, if you can provide the reference and expand the article, I won't complain at all. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 18:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

8503 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-27 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.298838000E09 +++$+++ Hi Max. Hope you are doing ok :) Just had a quick question I wanted to run by you. Do you have a link for the year-end charts in Japan for albums and singles? Like official on Oricon? I get the 2010, but I can't navigate to other years :S Its very confusing as Google doesn't translate the entire page. Care to help? :) I hope to find ''TEOM'' position in Japan for 2005 :D Thanks!-- +++$+++ Hi Max. Hope you are doing ok :) Just had a quick question I wanted to run by you. Do you have a link for the year-end charts in Japan for albums and singles? Like official on Oricon? I get the 2010, but I can't navigate to other years :S Its very confusing as Google doesn't translate the entire page. Care to help? :) I hope to find ''TEOM'' position in Japan for 2005 :D Thanks!--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  12:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
8504 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8503 +++$+++ 8503 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.298890920E09 +++$+++ Oh ok :) Thanks for the information Max, I appreciate it! :D Did you watch Celine at the Oscars? She looked so radiant! She finally gained a few needed pounds lol. I also liked her singing, although I would have appreciated some belting and more of her!-- +++$+++ :Oh ok :) Thanks for the information Max, I appreciate it! :D Did you watch Celine at the Oscars? She looked so radiant! She finally gained a few needed pounds lol. I also liked her singing, although I would have appreciated some belting and more of her!--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  03:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

410548 +++$+++ Sross (Public Policy) +++$+++ MSJapan +++$+++ 410548 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-20 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.292910060E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Sross (Public Policy)|Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Sross (Public Policy)|talk]]) 21:41, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
410549 +++$+++ Jeepday +++$+++ MSJapan +++$+++ 410548 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-08 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.294519080E09 +++$+++ FYI - [[User_talk:Carla.hunter#Content_dispute]],  +++$+++ :: FYI - [[User_talk:Carla.hunter#Content_dispute]], [[User:Jeepday|Jeepday]] <small>([[User talk:Jeepday|talk]])</small> 12:38, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

525706 +++$+++ Selket +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-25 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.216973760E09 +++$+++ --''' +++$+++ --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 01:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
525707 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525706 +++$+++ 525706 +++$+++ 2008-07-25 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.217018700E09 +++$+++ Response at [[Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion\/Log\/2008_July_25#July_25]]. Also, please stop deleting the external links while the TfD is active. -- +++$+++ :Response at [[Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_July_25#July_25]]. Also, please stop deleting the external links while the TfD is active. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 13:45, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
525708 +++$+++ Selket +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525706 +++$+++ 525707 +++$+++ 2008-07-25 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.217030880E09 +++$+++ I stopped deleting them once I had the idea to TfD the template.  --''' +++$+++ ::I stopped deleting them once I had the idea to TfD the template.  --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 17:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

270655 +++$+++ Ragesoss +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-07 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.249695000E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I'd be happy to see an interview with Graham in the ''Signpost''.  Would you like to do the interview, as Graham suggests?-- +++$+++ Mattisse, I'd be happy to see an interview with Graham in the ''Signpost''.  Would you like to do the interview, as Graham suggests?--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 18:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
270656 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270655 +++$+++ 270655 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.249695300E09 +++$+++ I would be happy to try, especially if you can give me some guidance as I have never done an interview for a publication in my life. Perhaps you could give me some links to past Signpost interview so I could get an idea of what is wanted. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I would be happy to try, especially if you can give me some guidance as I have never done an interview for a publication in my life. Perhaps you could give me some links to past Signpost interview so I could get an idea of what is wanted. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
270657 +++$+++ Ragesoss +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270655 +++$+++ 270656 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.249704120E09 +++$+++ Sure.  The ''Signpost'' style is pretty flexible for interviews, so in general I would say just use your best judgment.  One approach I like is to summarize a relevant issue (e.g., the alt text debate or WP:ACCESS) as neutrally and concisely as you can (basically in order to give the readers context), and then ask an open-ended question related to that issue that lets the interviewee share his perspective on it.  What I would find interesting would be finding out what it's like for a person who is blind to be an active editor... what sorts of methods and tools does he use to access the site and keep up with things, what sorts of problems does he encounter, etc.  You might also ask some more general questions, so that readers get a feel for Graham as an editor... what areas does he work in, what's he proud of, etc.; that kind of thing is often a good way to start out.  And then after the interview you can compose a sentence or two for the introduction to explain to readers why you are interviewing him and give them an idea of whether they might (or might not) want to read the whole interview.  You can browse some ''Signpost'' interviews with the WikiProject reports; here's the latest one: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost\/2009-07-27\/WikiProject report]].  For another type of interview, you can check out the questions I put to the Wikimedia board candidates, for example, [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost\/2009 Board elections\/Adam Koenigsberg]].-- +++$+++ ::Sure.  The ''Signpost'' style is pretty flexible for interviews, so in general I would say just use your best judgment.  One approach I like is to summarize a relevant issue (e.g., the alt text debate or WP:ACCESS) as neutrally and concisely as you can (basically in order to give the readers context), and then ask an open-ended question related to that issue that lets the interviewee share his perspective on it.  What I would find interesting would be finding out what it's like for a person who is blind to be an active editor... what sorts of methods and tools does he use to access the site and keep up with things, what sorts of problems does he encounter, etc.  You might also ask some more general questions, so that readers get a feel for Graham as an editor... what areas does he work in, what's he proud of, etc.; that kind of thing is often a good way to start out.  And then after the interview you can compose a sentence or two for the introduction to explain to readers why you are interviewing him and give them an idea of whether they might (or might not) want to read the whole interview.  You can browse some ''Signpost'' interviews with the WikiProject reports; here's the latest one: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-07-27/WikiProject report]].  For another type of interview, you can check out the questions I put to the Wikimedia board candidates, for example, [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009 Board elections/Adam Koenigsberg]].--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 21:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

8513 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8513 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.311225060E09 +++$+++ Hi Max. Nice to see you editing again :) So I have a question, maybe you can help. As you've seen, ''Mimi'' is headed to FAC soon, so InfoDisc is questionable (to them). Is there another source you know of that we can use to source ''Mimi'' certification and\/or sales in France? Thanks :D-- +++$+++ Hi Max. Nice to see you editing again :) So I have a question, maybe you can help. As you've seen, ''Mimi'' is headed to FAC soon, so InfoDisc is questionable (to them). Is there another source you know of that we can use to source ''Mimi'' certification and/or sales in France? Thanks :D--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  22:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
8514 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Max24 +++$+++ 8513 +++$+++ 8513 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.311287520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the source :) I was aware that Disque queen had certifications, but I for some reason didn't think ''Mimi'' appeared there :S Also, I wonder why ''Mimi'' isn't certified in Germany? Mariah '''did''' receive an award for Gold status there (it was stolen and presented to her at the Bambi awards). Any reason why its not under the certifications?-- +++$+++ :Thanks for the source :) I was aware that Disque queen had certifications, but I for some reason didn't think ''Mimi'' appeared there :S Also, I wonder why ''Mimi'' isn't certified in Germany? Mariah '''did''' receive an award for Gold status there (it was stolen and presented to her at the Bambi awards). Any reason why its not under the certifications?--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  15:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

270658 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270658 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-07 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.249700940E09 +++$+++ About ten days ago I made some changes in response to your comments. Can you please look at them and make your GA decision?  +++$+++ About ten days ago I made some changes in response to your comments. Can you please look at them and make your GA decision? [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 20:09, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
270659 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270658 +++$+++ 270658 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.249702080E09 +++$+++ OK, sorry!  &mdash; +++$+++ :OK, sorry!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
270660 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270658 +++$+++ 270659 +++$+++ 2009-08-08 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.249723260E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I really appreciated that you appreciated the work Wade and I have put into it. And yes, you will probably be seeing it at FAC sometime in the medium term.  +++$+++ ::Thanks! I really appreciated that you appreciated the work Wade and I have put into it. And yes, you will probably be seeing it at FAC sometime in the medium term. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 02:21, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

8515 +++$+++ Macdonald-ross +++$+++ Richard001 +++$+++ 8515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-17 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.276797360E09 +++$+++ Incidentally 1, I enjoyed the developing [[Chemical mimicry]], and wonder where\/how we can make a place for some of it in the main article.<br\/>Incidentally 2, have you noticed [[Underwater camouflage and mimicry]], a new page which virtually ignores the main mimicry article? It has some nice examples and pics.  +++$+++ Incidentally 1, I enjoyed the developing [[Chemical mimicry]], and wonder where/how we can make a place for some of it in the main article.<br/>Incidentally 2, have you noticed [[Underwater camouflage and mimicry]], a new page which virtually ignores the main mimicry article? It has some nice examples and pics. [[User:Macdonald-ross|Macdonald-ross]] ([[User talk:Macdonald-ross|talk]]) 10:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
8516 +++$+++ Richard001 +++$+++ Richard001 +++$+++ 8515 +++$+++ 8515 +++$+++ 2010-06-17 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.276801920E09 +++$+++ I haven't been very active lately. I don't see why it can't be updated by someone else - I may not get around to this. Haven't even been paying attention to the page for the most part, besides rereading it at some point this year. Chemical mimicry is something I did a little research on this year, and I hope to work more on that article as well as starting one on [[alarm pheromone]]s (the two overlap, as alarm pheromones are mimicked). I haven't really worked on integrating chemical mimicry into the main (mimicry) article, which I haven't edited for some time; I just posted a link to it on the mimicry template (as well as a red link for auditory mimicry, which could also do with an article at some point). Will have to check out this new article at some point; will bookmark it and look at it after my last exam. It is a pity when people don't look at integrating their new article into the rest of the project, which is important, though I haven't done much on this myself here and in many other places!  +++$+++ :I haven't been very active lately. I don't see why it can't be updated by someone else - I may not get around to this. Haven't even been paying attention to the page for the most part, besides rereading it at some point this year. Chemical mimicry is something I did a little research on this year, and I hope to work more on that article as well as starting one on [[alarm pheromone]]s (the two overlap, as alarm pheromones are mimicked). I haven't really worked on integrating chemical mimicry into the main (mimicry) article, which I haven't edited for some time; I just posted a link to it on the mimicry template (as well as a red link for auditory mimicry, which could also do with an article at some point). Will have to check out this new article at some point; will bookmark it and look at it after my last exam. It is a pity when people don't look at integrating their new article into the rest of the project, which is important, though I haven't done much on this myself here and in many other places! [[User:Richard001|Richard001]] ([[User talk:Richard001#top|talk]]) 12:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

8517 +++$+++ Karada +++$+++ Richard001 +++$+++ 8517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-23 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.277319840E09 +++$+++ Human sexuality is a very good example of an area where different social moralities are in conflict, with different groups of people holding strongly opposing views, so the distinction is particularly appropriate in articles like [[sexual intercourse]]. --  +++$+++ Human sexuality is a very good example of an area where different social moralities are in conflict, with different groups of people holding strongly opposing views, so the distinction is particularly appropriate in articles like [[sexual intercourse]]. -- [[User:Karada|Karada]] ([[User talk:Karada|talk]]) 12:04, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
8518 +++$+++ Karada +++$+++ Richard001 +++$+++ 8517 +++$+++ 8517 +++$+++ 2010-06-23 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.277320800E09 +++$+++ Update: see [http:\/\/www.philosophyblog.com.au\/ethics-vs-morality-the-distinction-between-ethics-and-morals\/ this blog entry] for more discussion of this topic. --  +++$+++ :Update: see [http://www.philosophyblog.com.au/ethics-vs-morality-the-distinction-between-ethics-and-morals/ this blog entry] for more discussion of this topic. -- [[User:Karada|Karada]] ([[User talk:Karada|talk]]) 12:20, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

270662 +++$+++ Graham87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270662 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-08 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.249730820E09 +++$+++ I suppose that my usability issues would be the most important thing for the interview, but only a fraction of my work is accessibility-related. I' do a lot of [[WP:HISTMERGE|history merging]] and work to preserve old pages like those at the [[Wikipedia:Historical archive|historical archive]]. I also upload music to Wikipedia and add sound samples to articles; see my [[Commons:User:Graham87|user page at Commons]]. I've done some fairly crazy things, as you can see on my user page and my talk page archives, but most of my work has just been standard [[WP:GNOME|WikiGnoming]]. ''' +++$+++ I suppose that my usability issues would be the most important thing for the interview, but only a fraction of my work is accessibility-related. I' do a lot of [[WP:HISTMERGE|history merging]] and work to preserve old pages like those at the [[Wikipedia:Historical archive|historical archive]]. I also upload music to Wikipedia and add sound samples to articles; see my [[Commons:User:Graham87|user page at Commons]]. I've done some fairly crazy things, as you can see on my user page and my talk page archives, but most of my work has just been standard [[WP:GNOME|WikiGnoming]]. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 04:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
270663 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270662 +++$+++ 270662 +++$+++ 2009-08-08 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.249740180E09 +++$+++ [[User:Graham87|Graham]], I'm sure that most of work has been standard [[WP:GNOME|WikiGnoming]]. But one of the distinctive features of your work is your contributions to discussions about [[WP:ACCESS]] and related topics. While you naturally don't want to be known as \"that blind editor\", your accessibility work is what gets your name recognised - heck, I've known it for about a year without trying at all. I also know from your recent contributions to the alt text discussions that you can paint a vivid picture of what using WP is like for a blind editor, and that will grab readers' attention much more strongly than the typical \"village magazine\" article, especially if introduced by a good tag line in the issue's contents page. -- +++$+++ :[[User:Graham87|Graham]], I'm sure that most of work has been standard [[WP:GNOME|WikiGnoming]]. But one of the distinctive features of your work is your contributions to discussions about [[WP:ACCESS]] and related topics. While you naturally don't want to be known as "that blind editor", your accessibility work is what gets your name recognised - heck, I've known it for about a year without trying at all. I also know from your recent contributions to the alt text discussions that you can paint a vivid picture of what using WP is like for a blind editor, and that will grab readers' attention much more strongly than the typical "village magazine" article, especially if introduced by a good tag line in the issue's contents page. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 07:03, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
270664 +++$+++ Graham87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270662 +++$+++ 270663 +++$+++ 2009-08-08 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.249749660E09 +++$+++ My blindness also influences the types of edits I make: removing spacing between list items, trying to rearrange the TOC so it's in the standard position, and even spelling fixes, because some spelling mistakes stick out like a sore thumb to me. So there is probably a lot to talk about related to my experience of blindness alone. Even though, as you said, I don't want to be known as \"just that blind editor\", it's an important part of my editing experience. ''' +++$+++ ::My blindness also influences the types of edits I make: removing spacing between list items, trying to rearrange the TOC so it's in the standard position, and even spelling fixes, because some spelling mistakes stick out like a sore thumb to me. So there is probably a lot to talk about related to my experience of blindness alone. Even though, as you said, I don't want to be known as "just that blind editor", it's an important part of my editing experience. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 09:41, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
270665 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270662 +++$+++ 270664 +++$+++ 2009-08-08 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.249750860E09 +++$+++ So all you need is a good tag line for the issue's contents page. Mattisse will think of something eye-catchng, she's good at DYK hooks. -- +++$+++ :::So all you need is a good tag line for the issue's contents page. Mattisse will think of something eye-catchng, she's good at DYK hooks. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 10:01, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

8519 +++$+++ Joe Chill +++$+++ Richard001 +++$+++ 8519 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-25 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.277458740E09 +++$+++ I noticed your comment on the talk page of [[Bahama Swallow]]. I asked the uploader of http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/peregrinebirdphoto\/4467073606\/ for permission to use the picture for the article.  +++$+++ I noticed your comment on the talk page of [[Bahama Swallow]]. I asked the uploader of http://www.flickr.com/photos/peregrinebirdphoto/4467073606/ for permission to use the picture for the article. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 02:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
8520 +++$+++ Joe Chill +++$+++ Richard001 +++$+++ 8519 +++$+++ 8519 +++$+++ 2010-06-25 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.277497320E09 +++$+++ I got permission and now the image is in the article.  +++$+++ :I got permission and now the image is in the article. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 13:22, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

532755 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532755 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-08 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.178652720E09 +++$+++ So much for now. If I get some other ideas, I'll tell you. And ask me if you need anything. Have a nice day. --''' +++$+++ So much for now. If I get some other ideas, I'll tell you. And ask me if you need anything. Have a nice day. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 12:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
532756 +++$+++ Shoessss +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532755 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.178683080E09 +++$+++ Once again, thanks for the input.  As always it is appreciated.  +++$+++ ::::Once again, thanks for the input.  As always it is appreciated. [[User:Shoessss|Shoessss]] 20:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
532757 +++$+++ Shoessss +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532755 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-04 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.180944540E09 +++$+++ Hey Guy!   Just wanted to say\u2026..\u201dWelcome Back\u201d! \u2022 <font face=\"Times New Roman\"> +++$+++ :::::Hey Guy!   Just wanted to say…..”Welcome Back”! • <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></font>  01:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

270666 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-08 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.249719060E09 +++$+++ In the background section, I think you edited to \"most major California officeholders were Republican\".  Wouldn't that be better as \"Republicans\"?-- +++$+++ In the background section, I think you edited to "most major California officeholders were Republican".  Wouldn't that be better as "Republicans"?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
270667 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270666 +++$+++ 270666 +++$+++ 2009-08-08 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.249719660E09 +++$+++ No. You wouldn't say \"all California officeholders are Americans\", would you? Or should I think of a better example. \"All Americans are Americans?\" I think you are obsessing too much over the article, and when you do that, then your writing \"idiosyncrasies\" tend to creep in.  &mdash; +++$+++ :No. You wouldn't say "all California officeholders are Americans", would you? Or should I think of a better example. "All Americans are Americans?" I think you are obsessing too much over the article, and when you do that, then your writing "idiosyncrasies" tend to creep in.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:21, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
270668 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270666 +++$+++ 270667 +++$+++ 2009-08-08 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.249719780E09 +++$+++ True.  Thanks.-- +++$+++ ::True.  Thanks.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:23, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
270669 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270666 +++$+++ 270666 +++$+++ 2009-08-09 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.249880820E09 +++$+++ Can you improve the final paragraph of the lede?  I'm very satisfied with the ending, but the first sentence needs work.  Feel free to do what you like with it.  I think the lede needs to end with the nicknames, because the \"Tricky Dick\" is a way to get the reader to go on to the rest of the article.-- +++$+++ :Can you improve the final paragraph of the lede?  I'm very satisfied with the ending, but the first sentence needs work.  Feel free to do what you like with it.  I think the lede needs to end with the nicknames, because the "Tricky Dick" is a way to get the reader to go on to the rest of the article.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 22:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
270670 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270666 +++$+++ 270669 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.250110620E09 +++$+++ Promoted!  Nearly as ugly as the campaign itself, but it made it.  I don't have anything nearly ready for FAC, so that gives things time to calm down and so forth.  Couldn't have done it without your help and calming influence.-- +++$+++ ::Promoted!  Nearly as ugly as the campaign itself, but it made it.  I don't have anything nearly ready for FAC, so that gives things time to calm down and so forth.  Couldn't have done it without your help and calming influence.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 13:57, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
270671 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270666 +++$+++ 270670 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.250111640E09 +++$+++ Thank god! congratulations.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Thank god! congratulations.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:14, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
270672 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270666 +++$+++ 270671 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.250111880E09 +++$+++ And to you, feel free to add it to your stats.  Not looking for TFA for this one anytime soon, 60th anniversary is next November, that would be a good time.-- +++$+++ ::::And to you, feel free to add it to your stats.  Not looking for TFA for this one anytime soon, 60th anniversary is next November, that would be a good time.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 14:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

532811 +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-11 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.181588280E09 +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Nicholas Saunders (Vice-Chancellor)}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Nicholas Saunders (Vice-Chancellor)]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.  +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Nicholas Saunders (Vice-Chancellor)}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Nicholas Saunders (Vice-Chancellor)]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:David Newton|David Newton]] 11:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
532812 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532811 +++$+++ 532811 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.181608680E09 +++$+++ Hi. The reason the article was deleted was that it was a copy from the stated website. You shouldn't do it unless you are the author of the website. What to do... I suggest you rewrite the article in your own words, state the notability, provide sources... There's more to read at [[WP:MOS]]. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The reason the article was deleted was that it was a copy from the stated website. You shouldn't do it unless you are the author of the website. What to do... I suggest you rewrite the article in your own words, state the notability, provide sources... There's more to read at [[WP:MOS]]. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 17:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

532813 +++$+++ ProfMozart +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532813 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-13 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.181728080E09 +++$+++ Why do you keep erasing the Romano German article. It is well written save for a few grammer errors, for english isnt my native tounge. Secondly it did have 5 proper refrences. Wiki has Romano British, and Roman Gaul, but no Romano German? Besides for its sincere relavence, compared to articles on porn stars, and video games, its an important part of history..I cant even restore it for some reason to work on grammer. Please do something. -- +++$+++ Why do you keep erasing the Romano German article. It is well written save for a few grammer errors, for english isnt my native tounge. Secondly it did have 5 proper refrences. Wiki has Romano British, and Roman Gaul, but no Romano German? Besides for its sincere relavence, compared to articles on porn stars, and video games, its an important part of history..I cant even restore it for some reason to work on grammer. Please do something. --[[User:ProfMozart|ProfMozart]] 02:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532814 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532813 +++$+++ 532813 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.181747280E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

532815 +++$+++ Xtreme racer +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-13 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.181803920E09 +++$+++ I personally see no reason for restoring a past version of this page. This author has been unwilling to comply to policy or proper format. The article has gone through 2 deletions for good reason. Several authors have offered suggestions but ProfMozart just erases them. Now I understand that he has said he will improve the article but given that chance before he failed to improve the article at all. Plus 3 of the references ProfMozart listed are to poets and the other one is to a work that has been unable to be located anywhere. Please reconsider your actions in restoring this article.  +++$+++ I personally see no reason for restoring a past version of this page. This author has been unwilling to comply to policy or proper format. The article has gone through 2 deletions for good reason. Several authors have offered suggestions but ProfMozart just erases them. Now I understand that he has said he will improve the article but given that chance before he failed to improve the article at all. Plus 3 of the references ProfMozart listed are to poets and the other one is to a work that has been unable to be located anywhere. Please reconsider your actions in restoring this article. [[User:Xtreme racer|Xtreme racer]] 23:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532816 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532815 +++$+++ 532815 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.181830980E09 +++$+++ Well, let's give the author a couple of days to improve the article. Otherwise, we can still delete it. I'll keep an eye on it. --''' +++$+++ : Well, let's give the author a couple of days to improve the article. Otherwise, we can still delete it. I'll keep an eye on it. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

270673 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-08 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.249777680E09 +++$+++ On a side note...do you have any thoughts on redirecting [[Elizabeth Eden]] to this article (to the Historical subsection) or to [[John Wojtowicz]]? It seems that she is not notable for anything other than connection with this event. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ On a side note...do you have any thoughts on redirecting [[Elizabeth Eden]] to this article (to the Historical subsection) or to [[John Wojtowicz]]? It seems that she is not notable for anything other than connection with this event. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 17:28, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
270674 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270673 +++$+++ 270673 +++$+++ 2009-08-08 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.249778640E09 +++$+++ In general, I am not in favor of redirecting articles out of existence if they can establish their notability independently, which  [[Elizabeth Eden]] does. I like short to-the-point articles and don't want to wade through [[Dog Day Afternoon]] to read about her. Also, adding this detail to the movie article would not benefit that article. She apparently has relevance to the LGBT community. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :In general, I am not in favor of redirecting articles out of existence if they can establish their notability independently, which  [[Elizabeth Eden]] does. I like short to-the-point articles and don't want to wade through [[Dog Day Afternoon]] to read about her. Also, adding this detail to the movie article would not benefit that article. She apparently has relevance to the LGBT community. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
270675 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270673 +++$+++ 270674 +++$+++ 2009-08-08 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.249778880E09 +++$+++ That's a good point. Thanks, <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ ::That's a good point. Thanks, <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 17:48, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

532818 +++$+++ Matthew +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532818 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-13 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.181763480E09 +++$+++ Hello, I'm not seeing what part of [[WP:NOT]] music fails -- so I've reverted your edits. It's OOU information, and certainly isn't indiscriminate. Feel free to bring it up on the discussion page if you feel differently, so that consensus may be achieved.  +++$+++ Hello, I'm not seeing what part of [[WP:NOT]] music fails -- so I've reverted your edits. It's OOU information, and certainly isn't indiscriminate. Feel free to bring it up on the discussion page if you feel differently, so that consensus may be achieved. [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 12:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532819 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532818 +++$+++ 532818 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.181763840E09 +++$+++ It's one of the subpages, wait... I found it. It's written here: [[Wikipedia:Television episodes#Things to avoid]]. I should've been more precise. It is at least unencyclopedical and bears no significance. Shall we move this discussion to a talkpage of some article? --''' +++$+++ : It's one of the subpages, wait... I found it. It's written here: [[Wikipedia:Television episodes#Things to avoid]]. I should've been more precise. It is at least unencyclopedical and bears no significance. Shall we move this discussion to a talkpage of some article? --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532820 +++$+++ Matthew +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532818 +++$+++ 532819 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.181764080E09 +++$+++ Somebody has apparently just added that, recently. As it states: \"Original song lyrics for a television episode breach copyright. References to featured music should be supported by ''reliable sources'' to establish notability. Do not just list music: Wikipedia is not a directory.\" (a primary source is a reliable source, the episode is source), opening a discussion sounds good to me.  +++$+++ :: Somebody has apparently just added that, recently. As it states: "Original song lyrics for a television episode breach copyright. References to featured music should be supported by ''reliable sources'' to establish notability. Do not just list music: Wikipedia is not a directory." (a primary source is a reliable source, the episode is source), opening a discussion sounds good to me. [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 12:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532821 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532818 +++$+++ 532820 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.181764260E09 +++$+++ The ''establish notability'' is the one that bothers me. Ok, there is a song or two by a reputed author in some episodes but how does this improve the significance? For a discussion, I suggest [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television]]. --''' +++$+++ ::: The ''establish notability'' is the one that bothers me. Ok, there is a song or two by a reputed author in some episodes but how does this improve the significance? For a discussion, I suggest [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television]]. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532822 +++$+++ Matthew +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532818 +++$+++ 532821 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.181764500E09 +++$+++ I've often found that music plays quite a significant part of an episode (often aiding in building a scene). Admittedly I've not seen past season one of Smallville yet... so I can't comment 100%. But it does seem relevant to me. I'd prefer it if we could get some secondary sources for the information as well.  +++$+++ :::: I've often found that music plays quite a significant part of an episode (often aiding in building a scene). Admittedly I've not seen past season one of Smallville yet... so I can't comment 100%. But it does seem relevant to me. I'd prefer it if we could get some secondary sources for the information as well. [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 12:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532823 +++$+++ Matthew +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532818 +++$+++ 532822 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.181765520E09 +++$+++ I'm all for discussion -- I'd much rather gain consensus on the issue than edit war, and I'll start one after I return in about five minutes (if one hasn't already been started).  +++$+++ ::::: I'm all for discussion -- I'd much rather gain consensus on the issue than edit war, and I'll start one after I return in about five minutes (if one hasn't already been started). [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 13:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

88803 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-17 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.150610520E09 +++$+++ E vidi, ne\u0161to sam razmi\u0161ljao oko naziva \u010dlanaka o starim hrvatskim \u017eupanijama: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Historical_counties_of_Croatia Nazivi \u010dlanaka su sada na ma\u0111arskom ali mislim da bi trebali da budu na hrvatskom. Pogledaj ovo: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Counties_in_the_Kingdom_of_Hungary Tu mo\u017ee\u0161 videti da nazivi \u010dlanaka o starim ma\u0111arskim \u017eupanijama sa podru\u010dja dana\u0161nje Slova\u010dke nisu na ma\u0111arskom, ve\u0107 na slova\u010dkom. Tim pre bi trebali da koristimo hrvatske nazive za \u017eupanije sa podru\u010dja Hrvatske-Slavonije, koja je bila autonomna u okviru Ugarske i gde je hrvatski jezik bio slu\u017ebeni. Nasuprot tome, Slova\u010dka nije bila autonomna niti je slova\u010dki bio slu\u017ebeni jezik u pomenutim \u017eupanijama, ali nazivi ovih \u010dlanaka su na slova\u010dkom. \u0160ta misli\u0161 o ovome?  +++$+++ E vidi, nešto sam razmišljao oko naziva članaka o starim hrvatskim županijama: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Historical_counties_of_Croatia Nazivi članaka su sada na mađarskom ali mislim da bi trebali da budu na hrvatskom. Pogledaj ovo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Counties_in_the_Kingdom_of_Hungary Tu možeš videti da nazivi članaka o starim mađarskim županijama sa područja današnje Slovačke nisu na mađarskom, već na slovačkom. Tim pre bi trebali da koristimo hrvatske nazive za županije sa područja Hrvatske-Slavonije, koja je bila autonomna u okviru Ugarske i gde je hrvatski jezik bio službeni. Nasuprot tome, Slovačka nije bila autonomna niti je slovački bio službeni jezik u pomenutim županijama, ali nazivi ovih članaka su na slovačkom. Šta misliš o ovome? [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 23:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
88804 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88803 +++$+++ 88803 +++$+++ 2006-06-17 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.150612200E09 +++$+++ Pa u jednom od istorijskih atlasa koji imam (ovaj je izdat 1970 u biv\u0161oj Jugoslaviji), \u017eupanije se zovu ovako: vara\u017edinska, kri\u017eeva\u010dka, po\u017ee\u0161ka, viroviti\u010dka, sremska, zagreba\u010dka, modru\u0161ko-rije\u010dka, li\u010dko-krbavska. Naravno, sremska \u017eupanija bi pre bila srijemska u originalu (ovaj atlas je ipak izdat u Beogradu). Dakle nazivi na\u0161ih \u010dlanaka mogli bi biti: Vara\u017edin, Kri\u017eevci, Po\u017eega, Virovitica, Srijem, Zagreb, Modru\u0161-Rijeka, Lika-Krbava (ovaj zadnji se ve\u0107 tako zove). Srijem bi mogao biti i Syrmia, jer se i \u010dlanak o sada\u0161njoj hrvatskoj \u017eupaniji zove Vukovar-Syrmia County, mada ja nemam ni\u0161ta protiv ni da koristimo naziv Srijem. Pored glavnog naziva kod naslova bi u zagradu mogli napisati ne\u0161to kao \"former county\" ili sli\u010dno. Ja nemam sada vremena da se time vi\u0161e bavim i da u\u010destvujem u razgovoru na Talk:Administrative divisions of the Kingdom of Hungary, ali nadam se da ti ovo \u0161to sam napisao mo\u017ee pomo\u0107i da ti ne\u0161to uradi\u0161 sa tim. Naravno ukoliko ima\u0161 volje i vremena da se time bavi\u0161 :)  +++$+++ *Pa u jednom od istorijskih atlasa koji imam (ovaj je izdat 1970 u bivšoj Jugoslaviji), županije se zovu ovako: varaždinska, križevačka, požeška, virovitička, sremska, zagrebačka, modruško-riječka, ličko-krbavska. Naravno, sremska županija bi pre bila srijemska u originalu (ovaj atlas je ipak izdat u Beogradu). Dakle nazivi naših članaka mogli bi biti: Varaždin, Križevci, Požega, Virovitica, Srijem, Zagreb, Modruš-Rijeka, Lika-Krbava (ovaj zadnji se već tako zove). Srijem bi mogao biti i Syrmia, jer se i članak o sadašnjoj hrvatskoj županiji zove Vukovar-Syrmia County, mada ja nemam ništa protiv ni da koristimo naziv Srijem. Pored glavnog naziva kod naslova bi u zagradu mogli napisati nešto kao "former county" ili slično. Ja nemam sada vremena da se time više bavim i da učestvujem u razgovoru na Talk:Administrative divisions of the Kingdom of Hungary, ali nadam se da ti ovo što sam napisao može pomoći da ti nešto uradiš sa tim. Naravno ukoliko imaš volje i vremena da se time baviš :) [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 23:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
88805 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88803 +++$+++ 88804 +++$+++ 2006-06-17 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.150613340E09 +++$+++ Pa \u0161ta fali ovoj literaturi koju sam ti naveo? :) Ina\u010de, napisao sam komentar na Talk:Administrative divisions of the Kingdom of Hungary, a mo\u017eda \u0107u kasnije predlo\u017eiti i glasanje o promeni naziva \u010dlanaka (Ipak se sa ovim treba ne\u0161to uraditi).  +++$+++ ::Pa šta fali ovoj literaturi koju sam ti naveo? :) Inače, napisao sam komentar na Talk:Administrative divisions of the Kingdom of Hungary, a možda ću kasnije predložiti i glasanje o promeni naziva članaka (Ipak se sa ovim treba nešto uraditi). [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 23:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
88806 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88803 +++$+++ 88805 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.150614840E09 +++$+++ Ina\u010de zanimljivo je da \u010dlanak Lika-Krbava ve\u0107 ima hrvatsko ime, jer je pravilan ma\u0111arski naziv za tu \u017eupaniju Lika-Korbava. Ako se niko ne bude bunio na moj predlog na Talk:Administrative divisions of the Kingdom of Hungary, ja \u0107u preimenovati i druge \u010dlanke o hrvatskim \u017eupanijama za nekoliko dana (da dam prvo ljudima vremena da prodiskutuju o tome).  +++$+++ :::Inače zanimljivo je da članak Lika-Krbava već ima hrvatsko ime, jer je pravilan mađarski naziv za tu županiju Lika-Korbava. Ako se niko ne bude bunio na moj predlog na Talk:Administrative divisions of the Kingdom of Hungary, ja ću preimenovati i druge članke o hrvatskim županijama za nekoliko dana (da dam prvo ljudima vremena da prodiskutuju o tome). [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 00:14, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

270676 +++$+++ GiacomoReturned +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-09 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.249878660E09 +++$+++ Bored again Mattise, trolling again, or just taking an interest in the finer things of life  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Palladian_architecture&curid=592136&diff=307043027&oldid=307035472]? So sorry, to dissapoint you, but neither of those paragraphs are by me. However, they were by someone who knew what they were talking about. How destructive your trolling is becoming - I thought you were never going to darken those FARC areas again with your presence - obviously just another of your \"statements!\"  +++$+++ Bored again Mattise, trolling again, or just taking an interest in the finer things of life  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Palladian_architecture&curid=592136&diff=307043027&oldid=307035472]? So sorry, to dissapoint you, but neither of those paragraphs are by me. However, they were by someone who knew what they were talking about. How destructive your trolling is becoming - I thought you were never going to darken those FARC areas again with your presence - obviously just another of your "statements!" [[User:GiacomoReturned|Giano]] ([[User talk:GiacomoReturned|talk]]) 21:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
270677 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270676 +++$+++ 270676 +++$+++ 2009-08-09 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.249879440E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I suggest you paste the diffs to the Talk page and ask for interested editors to source and reinstate as much as they can, and clean up the prose. -- +++$+++ :Mattisse, I suggest you paste the diffs to the Talk page and ask for interested editors to source and reinstate as much as they can, and clean up the prose. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 21:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
270678 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270676 +++$+++ 270677 +++$+++ 2009-08-09 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.249879860E09 +++$+++ I didn't remove any paragraphs. Giano did.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Palladian_architecture&curid=592136&diff=307043027&oldid=307035472] &mdash; +++$+++ ::I didn't remove any paragraphs. Giano did.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Palladian_architecture&curid=592136&diff=307043027&oldid=307035472] &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
270679 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270676 +++$+++ 270678 +++$+++ 2009-08-09 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.249880760E09 +++$+++ It might still be best for you to post the diffs of the tagging and removal to the Talk page, in case Giano does not do so. -- +++$+++ :::It might still be best for you to post the diffs of the tagging and removal to the Talk page, in case Giano does not do so. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 22:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
270680 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270676 +++$+++ 270679 +++$+++ 2009-08-09 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.249880940E09 +++$+++ I think I would be starting trouble if I did that. Could you do it with my permission? &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I think I would be starting trouble if I did that. Could you do it with my permission? &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:09, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
270681 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270676 +++$+++ 270680 +++$+++ 2009-08-09 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.249882440E09 +++$+++ I don't think imposing \"no go\" areas is a good way to implement \"the plan\". I suggest you do the posting, noting that another editor removed the contnet, but using the most neutral language possible. However if after a bit more thought you still think a neutral statement plus request for help in improving that content would be asking for trouble, leave me a message and I'll do it tomorrow. -- +++$+++ :::::I don't think imposing "no go" areas is a good way to implement "the plan". I suggest you do the posting, noting that another editor removed the contnet, but using the most neutral language possible. However if after a bit more thought you still think a neutral statement plus request for help in improving that content would be asking for trouble, leave me a message and I'll do it tomorrow. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 22:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
270682 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270676 +++$+++ 270681 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.249907280E09 +++$+++ Done. -- +++$+++ ::::::Done. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 05:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
270683 +++$+++ GiacomoReturned +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270676 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.249962240E09 +++$+++ Mattise, is just up to one of her games, before nominating for FARC or whatever, some may call it trolling others stalking - who knows and who cares - life is too short to be bothered by Mattisse or even Wikipedia- so go nominate Mattisse, or get one of your friends too - I am away at the moment  - so you should have a good run at it.  +++$+++ :::::::::Mattise, is just up to one of her games, before nominating for FARC or whatever, some may call it trolling others stalking - who knows and who cares - life is too short to be bothered by Mattisse or even Wikipedia- so go nominate Mattisse, or get one of your friends too - I am away at the moment  - so you should have a good run at it. [[User:GiacomoReturned|Giano]] ([[User talk:GiacomoReturned|talk]]) 20:44, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
270684 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270676 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.249963020E09 +++$+++ Giano, on reading your comments here and at [[Talk:Palladian architecture]], I wish you an enjoyable holiday\/wikibreak and hope you will return suitably refreshed and enthusiastic to contribute to the project. '' +++$+++ ::::::::::Giano, on reading your comments here and at [[Talk:Palladian architecture]], I wish you an enjoyable holiday/wikibreak and hope you will return suitably refreshed and enthusiastic to contribute to the project. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 20:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

569401 +++$+++ Krasniy +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-16 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.166266800E09 +++$+++ Once again an anon has added the UK rescue link to the Alaskan Malamute page. The last two times it was from the same IP, but usually it's from various different ones that I think all belong to a block from a UK broadband company. What should I do about this since it tends to come from different (so far, 5) IP addresses?\u2248 +++$+++ Once again an anon has added the UK rescue link to the Alaskan Malamute page. The last two times it was from the same IP, but usually it's from various different ones that I think all belong to a block from a UK broadband company. What should I do about this since it tends to come from different (so far, 5) IP addresses?≈[[User:Krasniy|<span style="color: rgb(130, 0,0);">Krasniy</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Krasniy|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Krasniy|contribs]])</sup> 03:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
569402 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569401 +++$+++ 569401 +++$+++ 2006-12-16 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.166311620E09 +++$+++ Hello! This article is having a little problem with this anonymous IP editor using Tiscali and originating out of Manchester, isn't it?  I have added a {{tl|spam}} warning to each of their respective Talk pages, along with the diff showing the evidence of their spamming the inappropriate external link.  We at Wikipedia are a tolerant bunch and these warnings are issued in order to educate editors as to the errors of their ways.  If they persist after warnings such as these, we increase the warnings up to level four and then report them to [[:WP:AIV]] for admin attention.  An admin then reviews the evidence of their contributions and decides what to do.  A short block is usually in order, the length increasing for each subsequent vandalism.  You can issue warnings up to level four, as can any editor.  Blocking can be done by admins such as myself.  Hopefully you won't have to report them to AIV but let me know if you do.  You might want to look at [[:Wikipedia:Template messages\/User talk namespace]] for a range of warnings that can be issued to editors.  The appropriate warnings in this case would be {{tl|spam}}, {{tl|spam2}}, {{tl|spam3}} and {{tl|spam4}}. If the page was being repeatedly spammed several times an hour then there might be a case for requesting [[:Wikipedia:Requests for page protection|semi-protection]] but I don't think that this is appropriate here. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello! This article is having a little problem with this anonymous IP editor using Tiscali and originating out of Manchester, isn't it?  I have added a {{tl|spam}} warning to each of their respective Talk pages, along with the diff showing the evidence of their spamming the inappropriate external link.  We at Wikipedia are a tolerant bunch and these warnings are issued in order to educate editors as to the errors of their ways.  If they persist after warnings such as these, we increase the warnings up to level four and then report them to [[:WP:AIV]] for admin attention.  An admin then reviews the evidence of their contributions and decides what to do.  A short block is usually in order, the length increasing for each subsequent vandalism.  You can issue warnings up to level four, as can any editor.  Blocking can be done by admins such as myself.  Hopefully you won't have to report them to AIV but let me know if you do.  You might want to look at [[:Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace]] for a range of warnings that can be issued to editors.  The appropriate warnings in this case would be {{tl|spam}}, {{tl|spam2}}, {{tl|spam3}} and {{tl|spam4}}. If the page was being repeatedly spammed several times an hour then there might be a case for requesting [[:Wikipedia:Requests for page protection|semi-protection]] but I don't think that this is appropriate here. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 15:27, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
569403 +++$+++ Krasniy +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569401 +++$+++ 569402 +++$+++ 2006-12-16 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.166321760E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for the help and adding the first spam warning. I hope I won't have to report them to AIV too \u2248 +++$+++ ::Hi, thanks for the help and adding the first spam warning. I hope I won't have to report them to AIV too ≈[[User:Krasniy|<span style="color: rgb(130, 0,0);">Krasniy</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Krasniy|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Krasniy|contribs]])</sup> 18:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

8536 +++$+++ JefffBeck +++$+++ GreatOrangePumpkin +++$+++ 8536 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311706920E09 +++$+++ Hi. How do you think, is [[Pink Floyd discography]] of FL quality?  +++$+++ Hi. How do you think, is [[Pink Floyd discography]] of FL quality? [[User:JefffBeck|JefffBeck]] ([[User talk:JefffBeck|talk]]) 12:02, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
8537 +++$+++ JefffBeck +++$+++ GreatOrangePumpkin +++$+++ 8536 +++$+++ 8536 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311735840E09 +++$+++ And wouldn't you like to improve [[Queen discography]] or [[The Rolling Stones discography]]?  +++$+++ :And wouldn't you like to improve [[Queen discography]] or [[The Rolling Stones discography]]? [[User:JefffBeck|JefffBeck]] ([[User talk:JefffBeck|talk]]) 20:04, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

532825 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.181765160E09 +++$+++ Simple list doesn't hold encyclopedic value. Matt says it helps build the scenes, ok, find third party sources that discuss ''Smallville'''s use of music to build scenes. Otherwise, that's just a personal opinion, that doesn't even help when you don't know what scenes go to which music. As of right now, it's simple trivia. <span style=\"font-family:Tempus Sans ITC\"> +++$+++ Simple list doesn't hold encyclopedic value. Matt says it helps build the scenes, ok, find third party sources that discuss ''Smallville'''s use of music to build scenes. Otherwise, that's just a personal opinion, that doesn't even help when you don't know what scenes go to which music. As of right now, it's simple trivia. <span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC">[[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]</span>  <span style="font-family:Showcard Gothic">[[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]]</span> 13:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532826 +++$+++ Matthew +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532825 +++$+++ 532825 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.181765520E09 +++$+++ My opinions are irrelevant to the article, as they won't be listed. I would expect Smallville's music has been discussed, however. I'll have a look around -- some examples may strengthen my argument.  +++$+++ :My opinions are irrelevant to the article, as they won't be listed. I would expect Smallville's music has been discussed, however. I'll have a look around -- some examples may strengthen my argument. [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 13:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532827 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532825 +++$+++ 532826 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.181765820E09 +++$+++ Everyone's opinions are irrelevant to the article, not just yours. [http:\/\/www.broadcastingcable.com\/article\/CA236149.html?display=Special+Report here's a source] that mentions that most of the artists try and contract with TV shows because it helps their album sales. You can't simply have a list of music and say it's encyclopedic. Where is the value? A song name? This isn't a fansite. <span style=\"font-family:Tempus Sans ITC\"> +++$+++ ::Everyone's opinions are irrelevant to the article, not just yours. [http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA236149.html?display=Special+Report here's a source] that mentions that most of the artists try and contract with TV shows because it helps their album sales. You can't simply have a list of music and say it's encyclopedic. Where is the value? A song name? This isn't a fansite. <span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC">[[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]</span>  <span style="font-family:Showcard Gothic">[[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]]</span> 13:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532828 +++$+++ Matthew +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532825 +++$+++ 532827 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.181766240E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure what you are stating when you talk about artists contacting the shows. You then talk about fansites, please stick to the core issue: listing music. I quickly find a verifiable secondary source with a Google search ([http:\/\/www.kryptonsite.com\/smallvillemusic.htm click]). The source is reliable, as per [[WP:RS]] -- authoritative and has a history of stability.  +++$+++ ::: I'm not sure what you are stating when you talk about artists contacting the shows. You then talk about fansites, please stick to the core issue: listing music. I quickly find a verifiable secondary source with a Google search ([http://www.kryptonsite.com/smallvillemusic.htm click]). The source is reliable, as per [[WP:RS]] -- authoritative and has a history of stability. [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 13:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532829 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532825 +++$+++ 532828 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.181766540E09 +++$+++ Kryptonsite is an external link, and a fansite. They list all the songs for us (as they wouldn't be normally included as just a list). There is no encyclopedic value to them. Secondly, Krpytonsite hasn't updated their list in awhile. Have you found a secondary source that discusses the use of music in those episodes? You're simply creating a directory of songs to episodes. And yes, I'm searching alongside you. I'd like to see the music section expanded to include reasons why they choose songs, or at least some interpretations of what the songs do for the show. Otherwise, it's nothing more than a directory, that can be found on any fansite, or IMDB.com. <span style=\"font-family:Tempus Sans ITC\"> +++$+++ ::::Kryptonsite is an external link, and a fansite. They list all the songs for us (as they wouldn't be normally included as just a list). There is no encyclopedic value to them. Secondly, Krpytonsite hasn't updated their list in awhile. Have you found a secondary source that discusses the use of music in those episodes? You're simply creating a directory of songs to episodes. And yes, I'm searching alongside you. I'd like to see the music section expanded to include reasons why they choose songs, or at least some interpretations of what the songs do for the show. Otherwise, it's nothing more than a directory, that can be found on any fansite, or IMDB.com. <span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC">[[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]</span>  <span style="font-family:Showcard Gothic">[[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]]</span> 13:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532830 +++$+++ Matthew +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532825 +++$+++ 532829 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.181766900E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict) Uh-huh, \"Kryptonsite is an external link\": Well, what was you expecting :-\\? Being a fan site doesn't disqualify a website from being a RS... your average Joe fansite isn't a RS, though. Even if they haven't updated their list, that doesn't disqualify it from being a valid source for the episodes it has listed.  +++$+++ ::::: (edit conflict) Uh-huh, "Kryptonsite is an external link": Well, what was you expecting :-\? Being a fan site doesn't disqualify a website from being a RS... your average Joe fansite isn't a RS, though. Even if they haven't updated their list, that doesn't disqualify it from being a valid source for the episodes it has listed. [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 13:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532831 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532825 +++$+++ 532828 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.181766720E09 +++$+++ Ok, good. We have a reliable source (to some degree). I've checked the talk pages, seems the problem was rised once before but with no comments (Season 1 talk). The fact that songs appear in the episodes benefits to the singers and to the producers, presumably. Still, I don't find the fact that some song was featured in a particular episode significant for the episode as itself, but it might be a good idea to expand the Music section in the Smallville article. There, I find appropriate to mention that the episodes usually feature contemporary music hits and give some examples. --''' +++$+++ :::: Ok, good. We have a reliable source (to some degree). I've checked the talk pages, seems the problem was rised once before but with no comments (Season 1 talk). The fact that songs appear in the episodes benefits to the singers and to the producers, presumably. Still, I don't find the fact that some song was featured in a particular episode significant for the episode as itself, but it might be a good idea to expand the Music section in the Smallville article. There, I find appropriate to mention that the episodes usually feature contemporary music hits and give some examples. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532832 +++$+++ Matthew +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532825 +++$+++ 532831 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.181766900E09 +++$+++ Expanding the music section with some of the more notable examples works for me.  +++$+++ ::::: Expanding the music section with some of the more notable examples works for me. [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 13:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

263567 +++$+++ Bob Castle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263567 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-08 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.149836280E09 +++$+++ Hello JPS, I have recently been attempting to significantly improve the ''[[One Foot in the Grave]]'' page, and I noticed that you have been involved with the page in the past. Obviously, it's relatively short at the moment, but I was wondering if there are any significant omissions that need rectifying in your opinion.  +++$+++ Hello JPS, I have recently been attempting to significantly improve the ''[[One Foot in the Grave]]'' page, and I noticed that you have been involved with the page in the past. Obviously, it's relatively short at the moment, but I was wondering if there are any significant omissions that need rectifying in your opinion. [[User:Bob Castle|Bob]] 23:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
263568 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263567 +++$+++ 263567 +++$+++ 2006-06-09 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.149870900E09 +++$+++ Hi Bob. Yes, I see you've been doing some work. I like how you've given the episode list its own page. I'll take a look at it sometime, though it seems to be pretty comprehensive. I agree that a couple of fair use images would be good. We should use tv-screenshot rather than the often misunderstood promophoto though.  +++$+++ :Hi Bob. Yes, I see you've been doing some work. I like how you've given the episode list its own page. I'll take a look at it sometime, though it seems to be pretty comprehensive. I agree that a couple of fair use images would be good. We should use tv-screenshot rather than the often misunderstood promophoto though. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

8540 +++$+++ Uzerakount +++$+++ GreatOrangePumpkin +++$+++ 8540 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.312166100E09 +++$+++ Hi, not sure about the concern of your message as it was not left on the article's [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/CeCe Peniston discography\/archive1|WFL list candidate]], but if you're one of its reviewers, just a note that required changes were made.  +++$+++ Hi, not sure about the concern of your message as it was not left on the article's [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/CeCe Peniston discography/archive1|WFL list candidate]], but if you're one of its reviewers, just a note that required changes were made. [[User:Uzerakount|Uzerakount]] ([[User talk:Uzerakount|talk]]) 19:35, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
8541 +++$+++ Uzerakount +++$+++ GreatOrangePumpkin +++$+++ 8540 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.312166220E09 +++$+++ Oh yes, I remember you now.. Sorry, tired out here. Hope you're well yrslf.  +++$+++ ::Oh yes, I remember you now.. Sorry, tired out here. Hope you're well yrslf. [[User:Uzerakount|Uzerakount]] ([[User talk:Uzerakount|talk]]) 19:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

176186 +++$+++ Neutrality +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ 176186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-15 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.308189120E09 +++$+++ All the entries on the list need to have a [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable source]] which is properly cited. Citing Wikipedia itself will not suffice, because anyone can change entries; there needs to be some sort of more authoritative reference. Being \"well policed by editors who care what instrument is being played\" is a great thing, but it is no substitute for reliable sources. Ordinary readers, as well as Wikipedians who do not work on the article, have no idea whether or not the list is accurate, or from where the information is derived. That is why citing reliable references is so important.  +++$+++ All the entries on the list need to have a [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable source]] which is properly cited. Citing Wikipedia itself will not suffice, because anyone can change entries; there needs to be some sort of more authoritative reference. Being "well policed by editors who care what instrument is being played" is a great thing, but it is no substitute for reliable sources. Ordinary readers, as well as Wikipedians who do not work on the article, have no idea whether or not the list is accurate, or from where the information is derived. That is why citing reliable references is so important. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality]]<sup>[[User talk:Neutrality|talk]]</sup> 18:52, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
176187 +++$+++ Neutrality +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ 176186 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.308192420E09 +++$+++ A photo would probably work. But every name on there needs some sort of source - we can't relying on readers trusting anonymous contributors. As far as \"ignore all rules,\" the necessity for verifiable, reliable sources is fundamental: It is one of the [[Wikipedia:Core content policies]], and is a principle rather than a rule. [[Wikipedia:What \"Ignore all rules\" means]] may be of assistance.  +++$+++ ::A photo would probably work. But every name on there needs some sort of source - we can't relying on readers trusting anonymous contributors. As far as "ignore all rules," the necessity for verifiable, reliable sources is fundamental: It is one of the [[Wikipedia:Core content policies]], and is a principle rather than a rule. [[Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means]] may be of assistance. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality]]<sup>[[User talk:Neutrality|talk]]</sup> 19:47, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

270687 +++$+++ Caspian blue +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270687 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-10 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.249949400E09 +++$+++ Hello, Mattisse. I saw you checking on sources on the article of [[Gyeongju]] for FARC. If possible, would you hold you review for a while? I've been working on the article, and replaced 12 dead links with others and added new 90 inline sources. I know the article that passed FA in 2004 is not like one of currently promoted FA articles, but I've tried to comply to the demands from reviewers. Still, the article has 6 dead links in total, and 10 something inline sources should be added. I could add them in a couple of days. However, I've known that you reviews for FA articles have significantly weighted to the community, so honestly, I'm afraid what you would evaluate it. So I'm seeking a favor. Thanks. +++$+++ Hello, Mattisse. I saw you checking on sources on the article of [[Gyeongju]] for FARC. If possible, would you hold you review for a while? I've been working on the article, and replaced 12 dead links with others and added new 90 inline sources. I know the article that passed FA in 2004 is not like one of currently promoted FA articles, but I've tried to comply to the demands from reviewers. Still, the article has 6 dead links in total, and 10 something inline sources should be added. I could add them in a couple of days. However, I've known that you reviews for FA articles have significantly weighted to the community, so honestly, I'm afraid what you would evaluate it. So I'm seeking a favor. Thanks.[[User talk:Caspian blue|'''Caspian''' blue]] 17:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
270688 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270687 +++$+++ 270687 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.249949520E09 +++$+++ I noticed all the progress you make and was not intending to weigh in at this point. You certainly deserve more time.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I noticed all the progress you make and was not intending to weigh in at this point. You certainly deserve more time.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:12, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
270689 +++$+++ Caspian blue +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270687 +++$+++ 270688 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.249949820E09 +++$+++ Thank you!-- +++$+++ ::Thank you!--[[User talk:Caspian blue|'''Caspian''' blue]] 17:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

8544 +++$+++  +++$+++ GreatOrangePumpkin +++$+++ 8544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.312352160E09 +++$+++ When you get a chance, please evaluate our progress at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)\/archive1]] and <s>strike<\/s> any resolved concerns.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ When you get a chance, please evaluate our progress at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)/archive1]] and <s>strike</s> any resolved concerns.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 23:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
8545 +++$+++  +++$+++ GreatOrangePumpkin +++$+++ 8544 +++$+++ 8544 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312414560E09 +++$+++ It appears that you struck all of your initial concerns as resolved. Is there anything further that we can do to get your '''support'''?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ :It appears that you struck all of your initial concerns as resolved. Is there anything further that we can do to get your '''support'''?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 16:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
8546 +++$+++  +++$+++ GreatOrangePumpkin +++$+++ 8544 +++$+++ 8545 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.312419420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the 2nd review. I have responded.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ ::Thanks for the 2nd review. I have responded.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 17:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
8547 +++$+++  +++$+++ GreatOrangePumpkin +++$+++ 8544 +++$+++ 8546 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312580160E09 +++$+++ How are we doing?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ :::How are we doing?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 14:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
8548 +++$+++  +++$+++ GreatOrangePumpkin +++$+++ 8544 +++$+++ 8547 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.312676280E09 +++$+++ Still trying to make everyone happy. How am I doing?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ ::::Still trying to make everyone happy. How am I doing?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 17:18, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

532833 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.181767020E09 +++$+++ IMDb contains the same list, and is probably updated with season 6 songs. The point isn't just verifying what songs were in the episodes, but why they were there. I read in The Stanford Daily, that ''Smallville'' may have\/had the highest number of music artists per episode of any show. The problem is that the author is like \"I think I heard somewhere\", and I have yet to find the original source (which could have just been a friend on his). I think that would be good to have, because it discusses this marketing tool of using all these songs in one episode. I didn't say it disqualified KS, I said that it being there already gave us a link to a comprehensive list of every song on the show, as does IMDb. But that isn't what Wikipedia is about. As I stated, Wiki isn't a directory for songs. <span style=\"font-family:Tempus Sans ITC\"> +++$+++ IMDb contains the same list, and is probably updated with season 6 songs. The point isn't just verifying what songs were in the episodes, but why they were there. I read in The Stanford Daily, that ''Smallville'' may have/had the highest number of music artists per episode of any show. The problem is that the author is like "I think I heard somewhere", and I have yet to find the original source (which could have just been a friend on his). I think that would be good to have, because it discusses this marketing tool of using all these songs in one episode. I didn't say it disqualified KS, I said that it being there already gave us a link to a comprehensive list of every song on the show, as does IMDb. But that isn't what Wikipedia is about. As I stated, Wiki isn't a directory for songs. <span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC">[[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]</span>  <span style="font-family:Showcard Gothic">[[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]]</span> 13:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532834 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532833 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.181767260E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict) Good. Do we have a consensus? Of course, we can bring more people to the debate if you think we should. If you have time, could you expand the section some time in future? Funny, I know the series only briefly and I've seen just a couple of episodes. I came across the articles coincidently and corrected them. I didn't expect such a debate :-) Anyway, it was a constructive one, after all. --''' +++$+++ :::::: (edit conflict) Good. Do we have a consensus? Of course, we can bring more people to the debate if you think we should. If you have time, could you expand the section some time in future? Funny, I know the series only briefly and I've seen just a couple of episodes. I came across the articles coincidently and corrected them. I didn't expect such a debate :-) Anyway, it was a constructive one, after all. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

270690 +++$+++ Haus +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-10 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.249959060E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I've been on the verge of verifying your hook for [[Okeanos Explorer]] twice and stopped myself because it should really be merged with [[USNS Capable (T-AGOS-16)]].  The resulting article would qualify for DYK as a 5x expansion.  If you agree and feel like doing the merge, drop me a note and I'll verify the hook for you.  Cheers. <span style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;\"><span style=\"color:Blue;\" > +++$+++ Hi.  I've been on the verge of verifying your hook for [[Okeanos Explorer]] twice and stopped myself because it should really be merged with [[USNS Capable (T-AGOS-16)]].  The resulting article would qualify for DYK as a 5x expansion.  If you agree and feel like doing the merge, drop me a note and I'll verify the hook for you.  Cheers. <span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;"><span style="color:Blue;" >[[User:Haus|<big>H</big>aus]]</span><sup><small>[[User_talk:Haus|<span style="color:Green;">Talk</span>]]</small></sup></span> 19:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
270691 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270690 +++$+++ 270690 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.249960080E09 +++$+++ If it is merged, the name needs to be retained, as all the new information forthcoming will be titled  [[Okeanos Explorer]] as are all the sources. Current and future NOAA and other articles will refer to it by the ''Okeanos Explorer'' name. The [[USNS Capable (T-AGOS-16)]] has ceased to exist. It would not be right to title [[Okeanos Explorer]] under an article name that is no longer relevant. Readers will not understand why Explorer info is under that title. I would be against your suggestion. If you want, the article should mention the former name as ''USNS Capable (T-AGOS-16)''. The ''Okeanos Explorer'' is followed on [[Twitter]], not ''USNS Capable (T-AGOS-16)''.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :If it is merged, the name needs to be retained, as all the new information forthcoming will be titled  [[Okeanos Explorer]] as are all the sources. Current and future NOAA and other articles will refer to it by the ''Okeanos Explorer'' name. The [[USNS Capable (T-AGOS-16)]] has ceased to exist. It would not be right to title [[Okeanos Explorer]] under an article name that is no longer relevant. Readers will not understand why Explorer info is under that title. I would be against your suggestion. If you want, the article should mention the former name as ''USNS Capable (T-AGOS-16)''. The ''Okeanos Explorer'' is followed on [[Twitter]], not ''USNS Capable (T-AGOS-16)''.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
270692 +++$+++ Haus +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270690 +++$+++ 270691 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.249961760E09 +++$+++ An example of how this situation can be handled is the first paragraph of the FA [[USS Siboney (ID-2999)]] which has redirects from its former names, such as [[USAHS Charles A. Stafford]], and mentions the previous names in the lede.  I think that something along the lines of \"...'''{{MV|Okeanos Explorer}}''', formerly known as '''{{USNS|Capable|T-AGOS-16}}'''\" would do the trick nicely.  Keeping the article name ''Okeanos Explorer'' seems perfectly logical. Cheers. <span style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;\"><span style=\"color:Blue;\" > +++$+++ :: An example of how this situation can be handled is the first paragraph of the FA [[USS Siboney (ID-2999)]] which has redirects from its former names, such as [[USAHS Charles A. Stafford]], and mentions the previous names in the lede.  I think that something along the lines of "...'''{{MV|Okeanos Explorer}}''', formerly known as '''{{USNS|Capable|T-AGOS-16}}'''" would do the trick nicely.  Keeping the article name ''Okeanos Explorer'' seems perfectly logical. Cheers. <span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;"><span style="color:Blue;" >[[User:Haus|<big>H</big>aus]]</span><sup><small>[[User_talk:Haus|<span style="color:Green;">Talk</span>]]</small></sup></span> 20:36, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
270693 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270690 +++$+++ 270692 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.249962720E09 +++$+++ As long as the article is named [[Okeanos Explorer]], its ok. Some places it is called NOAAS Okeanos Explorer. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::As long as the article is named [[Okeanos Explorer]], its ok. Some places it is called NOAAS Okeanos Explorer. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

532835 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.181767620E09 +++$+++ I've been searching my 'work' butt off, but I haven't come across people discussing the importance of the music as a whole to the series, not even on an individual episode basis, which would help me expand the episode pages some more. Though, I'm limited to what I can view at work, a lot of the larger news organizations are in subscriptioned areas. <span style=\"font-family:Tempus Sans ITC\"> +++$+++ I've been searching my 'work' butt off, but I haven't come across people discussing the importance of the music as a whole to the series, not even on an individual episode basis, which would help me expand the episode pages some more. Though, I'm limited to what I can view at work, a lot of the larger news organizations are in subscriptioned areas. <span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC">[[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]</span>  <span style="font-family:Showcard Gothic">[[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]]</span> 13:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532836 +++$+++ Wrad +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532835 +++$+++ 532835 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.181777220E09 +++$+++ Shouldn't this discussion be on the smallville talk page in question?  At least someone should copy and paste it there for future reference, otherwise we'll have this discussion all over again.  +++$+++ :Shouldn't this discussion be on the smallville talk page in question?  At least someone should copy and paste it there for future reference, otherwise we'll have this discussion all over again. [[User:Wrad|Wrad]] 16:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

532837 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-13 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.181783400E09 +++$+++ Hello, Iomesus! I see that you have expressed an interest in being [[WP:ADOPT|adopted]] by an experienced editor. I accept your request, being an experienced editor myself. Whether you want to learn about wiki markup, find something to do, or just talk to somebody, I'm the one you can talk to - just leave a message on my [[User talk:Tone|talk page]]. Good luck with Wikipedia!--''' +++$+++ Hello, Iomesus! I see that you have expressed an interest in being [[WP:ADOPT|adopted]] by an experienced editor. I accept your request, being an experienced editor myself. Whether you want to learn about wiki markup, find something to do, or just talk to somebody, I'm the one you can talk to - just leave a message on my [[User talk:Tone|talk page]]. Good luck with Wikipedia!--'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
532838 +++$+++ Iomesus +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532837 +++$+++ 532837 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.181785080E09 +++$+++ Now, is there some official way that you accept me as an adoptee? Thanks again, I really appreciate this.  +++$+++ :Now, is there some official way that you accept me as an adoptee? Thanks again, I really appreciate this. [[User:Iomesus|Iomesus]] 18:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

270695 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-11 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.249982280E09 +++$+++ Well I can't close ones that I nominated or edited non-superficially. Raul scheduled TFA 17 days in advance at the start of the month. He normally doesn't do this, so maybe he is going to be lying low until Aug 18 or so :( ''' +++$+++ Well I can't close ones that I nominated or edited non-superficially. Raul scheduled TFA 17 days in advance at the start of the month. He normally doesn't do this, so maybe he is going to be lying low until Aug 18 or so :( '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">cricket photo poll!</font>]]'') [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Paid_editing#Statement_by_YellowMonkey|paid editing=POV]] 02:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
270696 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270695 +++$+++ 270695 +++$+++ 2009-08-11 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.249988280E09 +++$+++ Started a discussion at [[WT:FAR]] ''' +++$+++ :Started a discussion at [[WT:FAR]] '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">cricket photo poll!</font>]]'') [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Paid_editing#Statement_by_YellowMonkey|paid editing=POV]] 03:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
270697 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270695 +++$+++ 270696 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.250116620E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. Please don't take the recent discussions at FAR to mean that you've been doing bad things and that you should leave. Nobody thinks there is anything wrong with individuals; rather, some are questioning the current culture at FAR. I sincerely hope that you continue to stay, as your presence has been totally positive\u2014I'm sure others would agree. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Hi Mattisse. Please don't take the recent discussions at FAR to mean that you've been doing bad things and that you should leave. Nobody thinks there is anything wrong with individuals; rather, some are questioning the current culture at FAR. I sincerely hope that you continue to stay, as your presence has been totally positive—I'm sure others would agree. Cheers, [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 15:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

8554 +++$+++  T-borg +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-24 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.167016860E09 +++$+++ '''''<font color=\"Green\">Merry Christmas, and<\/font>''''' <font color=\"Green\">'''''May the Edit be with you, always.'''''<\/font>  +++$+++ '''''<font color="Green">Merry Christmas, and</font>''''' <font color="Green">'''''May the Edit be with you, always.'''''</font> [[User: T-borg|<font color="Green">'''''T'''''</font>]]-<font color="Green">[[Borg (Star Trek)|borg]]</font> [[User talk: T-borg|<sup><font color="Orange">(drop me a line)</font></sup>]] 19:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
8555 +++$+++ AndonicO +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8554 +++$+++ 8554 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.166173440E09 +++$+++ <font color=\"white\">Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays {{BASEPAGENAME}}! | [[User:AndonicO|<font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\">'''A'''<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"DarkSlateGray\">ndonic<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"2\">'''O'''<\/font>]] <small><sup><font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"Tan\">[[User talk:AndonicO|''Talk'']]<\/font> | <font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"Tan\"> +++$+++ :<font color="white">Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays {{BASEPAGENAME}}! | [[User:AndonicO|<font face="Papyrus" color="Black">'''A'''</font><font face="Papyrus" color="DarkSlateGray">ndonic</font><font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="2">'''O'''</font>]] <small><sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="Tan">[[User talk:AndonicO|''Talk'']]</font> | <font face="Times New Roman" color="Tan">[[User:AndonicO/My Autograph Book|''Sign Here'']]</font></sup></small> 01:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

613095 +++$+++ Hut 8.5 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613095 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-08 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.207701060E09 +++$+++ It was a dab page, but while I was fixing the links [[Caledonia (Roman)]] was moved there. There were quite a few links unconnected with Scotland. '''''<font color=\"#FF0000\"> +++$+++ It was a dab page, but while I was fixing the links [[Caledonia (Roman)]] was moved there. There were quite a few links unconnected with Scotland. '''''<font color="#FF0000">[[User:Hut 8.5|Hut 8.5]]</font>''''' 17:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
613096 +++$+++ Hut 8.5 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613095 +++$+++ 613095 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.207705740E09 +++$+++ FYI, I've reverted all the edits. '''''<font color=\"#FF0000\"> +++$+++ :FYI, I've reverted all the edits. '''''<font color="#FF0000">[[User:Hut 8.5|Hut 8.5]]</font>''''' 18:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
613097 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613095 +++$+++ 613096 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.207706040E09 +++$+++ Thanks, as Deacon says above the move was made by another, sorry about the confusion. I think it likely that all of the non-Scottish links were to places named after Scotland, that sort of thing is very common. ..  +++$+++ ::Thanks, as Deacon says above the move was made by another, sorry about the confusion. I think it likely that all of the non-Scottish links were to places named after Scotland, that sort of thing is very common. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:54, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

270700 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270700 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-12 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.250131320E09 +++$+++ Are you not able to access [http:\/\/library.buffalo.edu\/pl\/collections\/jamesjoyce\/ this page]?  +++$+++ Are you not able to access [http://library.buffalo.edu/pl/collections/jamesjoyce/ this page]? [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 19:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
270701 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270700 +++$+++ 270700 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.250131380E09 +++$+++ Please explain your edits on talk before reverting twice (see [[WP:3RR]]).  I don't have a membership, and I can access the information.  Please use the article talk page before continuing to revert, to explain why you can't access a page that others can.   +++$+++ : Please explain your edits on talk before reverting twice (see [[WP:3RR]]).  I don't have a membership, and I can access the information.  Please use the article talk page before continuing to revert, to explain why you can't access a page that others can.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
270702 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270700 +++$+++ 270701 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.250131620E09 +++$+++ I am able to access that page, Dabomb87,  but twice before when I tried, it asked for my membership and login.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::I am able to access that page, Dabomb87,  but twice before when I tried, it asked for my membership and login.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
270703 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270700 +++$+++ 270702 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.250131800E09 +++$+++ So, when another editor indicates it is not membership only, please consider discussing on talk before reverting.  AGF.  Similar issues are occurring at the unreviewed featured article page; stability in FA and related pages is a concern, so please discuss edits before reverting.   +++$+++ ::: So, when another editor indicates it is not membership only, please consider discussing on talk before reverting.  AGF.  Similar issues are occurring at the unreviewed featured article page; stability in FA and related pages is a concern, so please discuss edits before reverting.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
270704 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270700 +++$+++ 270702 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.250132040E09 +++$+++ OK. And I suggest you do the same.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::: OK. And I suggest you do the same.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:54, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
270705 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270700 +++$+++ 270704 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.250132820E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, when you have been reverted once, and a reason has been given, then you should attempt to understand the problem before you revert twice.  Would you please remove [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=James_Joyce&diff=307612243&oldid=307611329 this edit] now, since it's not correct?  Thanks,  +++$+++ :::: Mattisse, when you have been reverted once, and a reason has been given, then you should attempt to understand the problem before you revert twice.  Would you please remove [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Joyce&diff=307612243&oldid=307611329 this edit] now, since it's not correct?  Thanks, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:07, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

480382 +++$+++ Ulric1313 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480382 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-15 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.268699100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ulric1313|Ulric1313]] ([[User talk:Ulric1313|talk]]) 17:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
480383 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480382 +++$+++ 480382 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 09:39:00 +++$+++ 1.268757540E09 +++$+++ Ergh, Toolserver is killin' me. The error that is causing the dab challenge to fail is causing my database connections to pile up. I checked - the tables are still there, so my schema hasn't been deleted, despite what the error implies.  I'll try to get to this, but we just moved to a new apartment (no broadband yet) and I can't access the Toolserver from work.  But I'll do what I can. -- +++$+++ :Ergh, Toolserver is killin' me. The error that is causing the dab challenge to fail is causing my database connections to pile up. I checked - the tables are still there, so my schema hasn't been deleted, despite what the error implies.  I'll try to get to this, but we just moved to a new apartment (no broadband yet) and I can't access the Toolserver from work.  But I'll do what I can. --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 09:39, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
480384 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480382 +++$+++ 480383 +++$+++ 2010-03-22 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.269285120E09 +++$+++ OK, should be sorted. Let me know if you see any new problems. -- +++$+++ ::OK, should be sorted. Let me know if you see any new problems. --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 12:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

532849 +++$+++ Claphands +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-17 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.182121140E09 +++$+++ It would be great if you could recreate the article so I could add more information about the artist and continue to assert its notability.  Thanks.  +++$+++ It would be great if you could recreate the article so I could add more information about the artist and continue to assert its notability.  Thanks. [[User:Claphands|Claphands]] 15:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
532850 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532849 +++$+++ 532849 +++$+++ 2007-06-17 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.182122520E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. You're free to work on the article now. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. You're free to work on the article now. Regards, --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

270707 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-12 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.250132580E09 +++$+++ <edit conflict> I lost my edit in the conflict, but basically I would like to thank SlimVirgin as I have always wondered how to do that. Thanks!  &mdash; +++$+++ <edit conflict> I lost my edit in the conflict, but basically I would like to thank SlimVirgin as I have always wondered how to do that. Thanks!  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
270708 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270707 +++$+++ 270707 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.250132280E09 +++$+++ The [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~dispenser\/view\/Checklinks link checker] is a very handy tool for identifying and fixing dead links.  +++$+++ :The [http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/view/Checklinks link checker] is a very handy tool for identifying and fixing dead links. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 19:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
270709 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270707 +++$+++ 270708 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.250132760E09 +++$+++ I use the toolserver, but I have found that it is quite inaccurate. You really have to check each link, as it indicates many are ok when they are 404. There is no substitute for checking.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::I use the toolserver, but I have found that it is quite inaccurate. You really have to check each link, as it indicates many are ok when they are 404. There is no substitute for checking.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
270710 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270707 +++$+++ 270709 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.250133120E09 +++$+++ Yes, it is not always correct, which is why I always check.  +++$+++ :::Yes, it is not always correct, which is why I always check. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 20:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

8564 +++$+++ Arjun01 +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.169179980E09 +++$+++ Ahh!!! Where have you been Gray Porpoise? I was getting worried, hope everything is going okay and I hope that adminship is treating you well :). Cheers <small>did I already tell you I got my name changed from Seadog.M.S?<\/small>  +++$+++ Ahh!!! Where have you been Gray Porpoise? I was getting worried, hope everything is going okay and I hope that adminship is treating you well :). Cheers <small>did I already tell you I got my name changed from Seadog.M.S?</small> [[User:Arjun01|<font color="#7b68ee">'''Arjun'''</font>]] 20:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
8565 +++$+++ Arjun01 +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8564 +++$+++ 8564 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.169180700E09 +++$+++ Doh. That is okay :). Well I have been busy on wikipedia, I have gotten over the 7,500 mark, I have been working on [[List of Stratocaster players|this list]] and also working on this [[Portal:Hinduism|this portal]] which I nominated for Featured portal :). So we will just have to see where that goes. Cheers!  +++$+++ :Doh. That is okay :). Well I have been busy on wikipedia, I have gotten over the 7,500 mark, I have been working on [[List of Stratocaster players|this list]] and also working on this [[Portal:Hinduism|this portal]] which I nominated for Featured portal :). So we will just have to see where that goes. Cheers! [[User:Arjun01|<font color="#7b68ee">'''Arjun'''</font>]] 20:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

532853 +++$+++ Chris Buttigieg +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532853 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-18 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.182179880E09 +++$+++ My apologies. I was a bit rash there.  +++$+++ My apologies. I was a bit rash there. [[User:Chris Buttigieg|Chris Buttigieg]]<sup>[[User Talk:Chris Buttigieg|<font color="#008080">talk</font>]]</sup> 08:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
532854 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532853 +++$+++ 532853 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.182195360E09 +++$+++ Ok, if you make sure that the article will be made NPOV, I see no problem in restoring. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, if you make sure that the article will be made NPOV, I see no problem in restoring. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

8566 +++$+++ AO +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.169181540E09 +++$+++ Hi Gray Porpoise! Great to see you back again! I thought a whaler had found you and that [[:Image:Whaling in the Faroe Islands.jpg|this]] had happened to you. ;-) | [[User:AO|<font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"1\">'''A'''<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"DarkSlateGray\">ndonic<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"1\">'''O'''<\/font>]] <sup><font color=\"DarkSlateGray\">[[User talk:AO|''Talk'']]<\/font> \xb7 <font color=\"DarkSlateGray\"> +++$+++ Hi Gray Porpoise! Great to see you back again! I thought a whaler had found you and that [[:Image:Whaling in the Faroe Islands.jpg|this]] had happened to you. ;-) | [[User:AO|<font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="1">'''A'''</font><font face="Papyrus" color="DarkSlateGray">ndonic</font><font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="1">'''O'''</font>]] <sup><font color="DarkSlateGray">[[User talk:AO|''Talk'']]</font> · <font color="DarkSlateGray">[[User:AO/My Autograph Book|''Sign Here'']]</font></sup> 20:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
8567 +++$+++ AO +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8566 +++$+++ 8566 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.169181960E09 +++$+++ I'm glad it was only a migration then. :-) Good luck on your WikiProject! By the way, your page ''still'' says you're not an admin. :-O | [[User:AO|<font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"1\">'''A'''<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"DarkSlateGray\">ndonic<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"1\">'''O'''<\/font>]] <sup><font color=\"DarkSlateGray\">[[User talk:AO|''Talk'']]<\/font> \xb7 <font color=\"DarkSlateGray\"> +++$+++ :I'm glad it was only a migration then. :-) Good luck on your WikiProject! By the way, your page ''still'' says you're not an admin. :-O | [[User:AO|<font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="1">'''A'''</font><font face="Papyrus" color="DarkSlateGray">ndonic</font><font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="1">'''O'''</font>]] <sup><font color="DarkSlateGray">[[User talk:AO|''Talk'']]</font> · <font color="DarkSlateGray">[[User:AO/My Autograph Book|''Sign Here'']]</font></sup> 20:46, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
8568 +++$+++ AO +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8566 +++$+++ 8567 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.169182200E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. | [[User:AO|<font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"1\">'''A'''<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"DarkSlateGray\">ndonic<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"1\">'''O'''<\/font>]] <sup><font color=\"DarkSlateGray\">[[User talk:AO|''Talk'']]<\/font> \xb7 <font color=\"DarkSlateGray\"> +++$+++ ::You're welcome. | [[User:AO|<font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="1">'''A'''</font><font face="Papyrus" color="DarkSlateGray">ndonic</font><font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="1">'''O'''</font>]] <sup><font color="DarkSlateGray">[[User talk:AO|''Talk'']]</font> · <font color="DarkSlateGray">[[User:AO/My Autograph Book|''Sign Here'']]</font></sup> 20:50, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

532855 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-19 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.182285000E09 +++$+++ Anyway, from what you told me, I think the magazine meets the notability criteria. I am sure you can rewrite it, considering my comments. I'll post the copy of the text on your talkpage but I suggest you start from the beginning. Regards. --''' +++$+++ Anyway, from what you told me, I think the magazine meets the notability criteria. I am sure you can rewrite it, considering my comments. I'll post the copy of the text on your talkpage but I suggest you start from the beginning. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
532856 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532855 +++$+++ 532855 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.182370020E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article you submitted was extremly short and it had no references and no external links. Besides, the notability was not stated. Try to comply with these guidelines and the article should be ok. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article you submitted was extremly short and it had no references and no external links. Besides, the notability was not stated. Try to comply with these guidelines and the article should be ok. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

270712 +++$+++ J.delanoy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270712 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.251454620E09 +++$+++ If you wish to contest this block, you may do so by placing {{tlp|unblock|''reason''}} below this notice.  +++$+++ If you wish to contest this block, you may do so by placing {{tlp|unblock|''reason''}} below this notice. [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="green">J'''.'''delanoy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<font color="blue"><sub>adds</sub></font>]] 03:17, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270713 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270712 +++$+++ 270712 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.251455040E09 +++$+++ I agree with J.delanoy's CU findings. In addition, the SPAs all seem to be targeting Bishonen, who I know Mattisse has some issues with, based on previous encounters at FAR, AN\/I, and other drama huts. <span style=\"background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;\"> +++$+++ :I agree with J.delanoy's CU findings. In addition, the SPAs all seem to be targeting Bishonen, who I know Mattisse has some issues with, based on previous encounters at FAR, AN/I, and other drama huts. <span style="background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not wikidrama]])</sub> 03:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270714 +++$+++ Versageek +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270712 +++$+++ 270713 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.251455400E09 +++$+++ I also agree with J.delanoy's & Nishkid64's CU findings. -- +++$+++ ::I also agree with J.delanoy's & Nishkid64's CU findings. --[[User:Versageek|<span style="color:midnightblue">Versa</span>]][[User_talk:Versageek|<span style="color:darkred">geek</span>]] 03:30, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270715 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270712 +++$+++ 270714 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.251455640E09 +++$+++ Fine. I have no \"issues\" with Bishon. However, I get the strong hint and will leave Wikipedia. You make your choices about who to favor and who to kick away. I am gone. I see you favor certain editors at the expense of trashing others. I am willing to leave Wikipedia. It is an ugly place ruled by cabals.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::Fine. I have no "issues" with Bishon. However, I get the strong hint and will leave Wikipedia. You make your choices about who to favor and who to kick away. I am gone. I see you favor certain editors at the expense of trashing others. I am willing to leave Wikipedia. It is an ugly place ruled by cabals.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:34, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270716 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270712 +++$+++ 270715 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.251456120E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I am saddened that you are unwilling to let go of personal issues and carry on with your productive article work. However, I implore you to return to Wikipedia after this block and focus solely on what you do well: improve articles.  +++$+++ ::::Mattisse, I am saddened that you are unwilling to let go of personal issues and carry on with your productive article work. However, I implore you to return to Wikipedia after this block and focus solely on what you do well: improve articles. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 03:42, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270717 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270712 +++$+++ 270716 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.251456480E09 +++$+++ You are mistaken. I have no issues as you assume. If my contributions are not good enough, I am willing to leave. It is time to stop trying to contribute to Wikipedia when this is my reward.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::You are mistaken. I have no issues as you assume. If my contributions are not good enough, I am willing to leave. It is time to stop trying to contribute to Wikipedia when this is my reward.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:48, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270718 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270712 +++$+++ 270717 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.251456540E09 +++$+++ I sign off on the above block, not that it matters.  +++$+++ ::::::I sign off on the above block, not that it matters. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 03:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

532857 +++$+++ Wildthing61476 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-19 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.182313740E09 +++$+++ I saw you were the deleting admin earlier today for this article. Is it possible this article can be salted, as it has been recreated again for the 2nd time today alone. This article already has had an AfD and was voted to be deleted, and I have left requests on the talk page to have an editor request for the page to be restored in deletion review.  +++$+++ I saw you were the deleting admin earlier today for this article. Is it possible this article can be salted, as it has been recreated again for the 2nd time today alone. This article already has had an AfD and was voted to be deleted, and I have left requests on the talk page to have an editor request for the page to be restored in deletion review. [[User:Wildthing61476|Wildthing61476]] 21:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
532858 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532857 +++$+++ 532857 +++$+++ 2007-06-19 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.182315060E09 +++$+++ You can list an article for a deletion review yourself as well. See [[WP:DRV]] for details. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : You can list an article for a deletion review yourself as well. See [[WP:DRV]] for details. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
532859 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532857 +++$+++ 532857 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.182370020E09 +++$+++ Yes, there are still no references. See WP:CITE for the way to cite sources properly. And don't use bold text apart from title. Otherwise, the article is better now. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Yes, there are still no references. See WP:CITE for the way to cite sources properly. And don't use bold text apart from title. Otherwise, the article is better now. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

8570 +++$+++ Fang Aili +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8570 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-24 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.169705040E09 +++$+++ Are you coaching [[User:Selmo|Selmo]] right now? Did that ever get off the ground? Thanks,  +++$+++ Are you coaching [[User:Selmo|Selmo]] right now? Did that ever get off the ground? Thanks, [[User:Fang Aili|Fang Aili]] <sup>[[User talk:Fang Aili|<font color="green">talk</font>]]</sup> 22:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
8571 +++$+++ Fang Aili +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8570 +++$+++ 8570 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.169770740E09 +++$+++ That's fine. I was just wondering because in case you were free I might try to match you up with a new student. There's a line and I'd like to match up people with available coaches. But.. whatever you're comfortable with. -- +++$+++ :That's fine. I was just wondering because in case you were free I might try to match you up with a new student. There's a line and I'd like to match up people with available coaches. But.. whatever you're comfortable with. --[[User:Fang Aili|Fang Aili]] <sup>[[User talk:Fang Aili|<font color="green">talk</font>]]</sup> 16:19, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
8572 +++$+++ Fang Aili +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8570 +++$+++ 8571 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.169784720E09 +++$+++ Ok. Do you mind asking Selmo if he still wants a coach? -- +++$+++ ::Ok. Do you mind asking Selmo if he still wants a coach? --[[User:Fang Aili|Fang Aili]] <sup>[[User talk:Fang Aili|<font color="green">talk</font>]]</sup> 20:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

532860 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-20 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.182402120E09 +++$+++ Hi; just for the record, the naked neck chicken does actually exist, although I would agree that the article which you deleted (while I was considering it) was not a good article. I have made no change to your action.--<font color=\"Red\"> +++$+++ Hi; just for the record, the naked neck chicken does actually exist, although I would agree that the article which you deleted (while I was considering it) was not a good article. I have made no change to your action.--<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony.bradbury|'''Anthony.bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 22:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
532861 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532860 +++$+++ 532860 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.182402180E09 +++$+++ Acknowledged. Thank you for checking. --''' +++$+++ : Acknowledged. Thank you for checking. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

613098 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-08 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.207713060E09 +++$+++ I doubt the choice of username is enough to prevent the inevitable: {{user5|1=FilaNoBlock}} \u2013 +++$+++ I doubt the choice of username is enough to prevent the inevitable: {{user5|1=FilaNoBlock}} –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 20:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
613099 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613098 +++$+++ 613098 +++$+++ 2008-04-09 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.207791240E09 +++$+++ Just found another one: {{user5|1=IloveTrains}} \u2013 +++$+++ :Just found another one: {{user5|1=IloveTrains}} –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 18:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
613100 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613098 +++$+++ 613099 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.208144880E09 +++$+++ This one was created today: {{user5|1=FilaNeverBlock}} \u2013 +++$+++ ::This one was created today: {{user5|1=FilaNeverBlock}} –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 20:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

532862 +++$+++ Kubigula +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532862 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-21 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.182422880E09 +++$+++ ...for you support at my RFA.  Looks like you have been doing this for a while, so please let me know if you have any suggestions on where I can help out.  I've already discovered the constant backlog at CSD.--<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman; font-size:11pt\"> +++$+++ ...for you support at my RFA.  Looks like you have been doing this for a while, so please let me know if you have any suggestions on where I can help out.  I've already discovered the constant backlog at CSD.--<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size:11pt">[[User:Kubigula|Kubigula]] ''([[User talk:Kubigula|talk]])''</span> 03:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
532863 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532862 +++$+++ 532862 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.182482340E09 +++$+++ There are some copyright symbols. You should avoid using those in the article. Otherwise... it would be ok if you could trim it a little. I will restore it for you. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : There are some copyright symbols. You should avoid using those in the article. Otherwise... it would be ok if you could trim it a little. I will restore it for you. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

525717 +++$+++ Shell_Kinney +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525717 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-29 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.217392620E09 +++$+++ I'm completely confused about what happened with this edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Kasabach-Merritt_syndrome&diff=227948799&oldid=227907255]. I've reverted the change, but then it occurred to me that you might have just subst a template or something else that caused [[Kasabach-Merritt syndrome]] to be overwritten with the content from Helen of Troy...anyways, I thought I'd give you a heads up.  Thanks. <font face=\"Tempus Sans ITC\"  color=\"#2B0066\"> +++$+++ I'm completely confused about what happened with this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kasabach-Merritt_syndrome&diff=227948799&oldid=227907255]. I've reverted the change, but then it occurred to me that you might have just subst a template or something else that caused [[Kasabach-Merritt syndrome]] to be overwritten with the content from Helen of Troy...anyways, I thought I'd give you a heads up.  Thanks. <font face="Tempus Sans ITC"  color="#2B0066">[[User:Shell_Kinney|Shell]]   <sup>[[User_talk:Shell_Kinney|babelfish]]</sup></font> 21:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
525718 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525717 +++$+++ 525717 +++$+++ 2008-07-29 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.217394000E09 +++$+++ I'm not exactly sure what happened there, but thank you for correcting it. -- +++$+++ :I'm not exactly sure what happened there, but thank you for correcting it. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian#top|talk]]) 22:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
525719 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525717 +++$+++ 525718 +++$+++ 2008-07-30 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.217426400E09 +++$+++ That was indeed really awkward... were you reading about Helen of Troy or something? -- +++$+++ ::That was indeed really awkward... were you reading about Helen of Troy or something? --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 07:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

270720 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.251484380E09 +++$+++ What were the edits of CallMeNow that were worth a two week block? They are deleted so I cannot tell. What were the \"abusive\" edits by the other account. I do not see any in the conbributions of that account. Others are allowed to have undisclosed sockpuppets. So, even if these were mine, what is the harm? It took Arbcom a month to desyp Geogre for a two year sockpuppet spree of abusive sockpuppeting and he was never blocked that I recall. Favouritism at it's worse on Wikipedia. There is a cabal for real, protecting the elite.  &mdash; +++$+++ What were the edits of CallMeNow that were worth a two week block? They are deleted so I cannot tell. What were the "abusive" edits by the other account. I do not see any in the conbributions of that account. Others are allowed to have undisclosed sockpuppets. So, even if these were mine, what is the harm? It took Arbcom a month to desyp Geogre for a two year sockpuppet spree of abusive sockpuppeting and he was never blocked that I recall. Favouritism at it's worse on Wikipedia. There is a cabal for real, protecting the elite.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 11:33, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270721 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.251492420E09 +++$+++ I think those who support the block should explain why there was no prior warning and why the block was so severe. -- +++$+++ :I think those who support the block should explain why there was no prior warning and why the block was so severe. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 13:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270722 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.251493140E09 +++$+++ What Mattisse appears to have done was \"impolitic\" at best, and I'd go so far as to say bloody stupid. But I don't see anything in the contributions of CallMeNow to warrant such a severe punishment, without warning. As Philcha says above, it really does confirm what many already know; favoured sons like Geogre\u2014and many others\u2014routinely get away with behaviours that would get a less popular editor blocked. Corrupt doesn't even get close to describing the chaotic governance of this place. -- +++$+++ *What Mattisse appears to have done was "impolitic" at best, and I'd go so far as to say bloody stupid. But I don't see anything in the contributions of CallMeNow to warrant such a severe punishment, without warning. As Philcha says above, it really does confirm what many already know; favoured sons like Geogre—and many others—routinely get away with behaviours that would get a less popular editor blocked. Corrupt doesn't even get close to describing the chaotic governance of this place. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 13:59, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270723 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 270722 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.251493500E09 +++$+++ I too would be interested in knowing why there were no prior warning and why the block was for as long as it is.  +++$+++ :*I too would be interested in knowing why there were no prior warning and why the block was for as long as it is. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 14:05, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270724 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.251493740E09 +++$+++ From what I can see, while the sockpuppetry is juvenile in character, it is barely abusive. A couple of childish comments from one account, a second account not used abusively, and a third unused account hardly call for a drastic block unless there is a prior pattern\/history of abusive sockpuppetry. I suggest rescinding the block and warning the user instead. -- +++$+++ *From what I can see, while the sockpuppetry is juvenile in character, it is barely abusive. A couple of childish comments from one account, a second account not used abusively, and a third unused account hardly call for a drastic block unless there is a prior pattern/history of abusive sockpuppetry. I suggest rescinding the block and warning the user instead. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 14:09, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270725 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 270724 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.251495780E09 +++$+++ Mattisse has been here for 3 years. We're supposed to just give her a slap on the wrist for sockpuppetry now? I don't think the user should be unblocked, but perhaps the block could be reduced to 31 hours or something along those lines. <span style=\"background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;\"> +++$+++ :*Mattisse has been here for 3 years. We're supposed to just give her a slap on the wrist for sockpuppetry now? I don't think the user should be unblocked, but perhaps the block could be reduced to 31 hours or something along those lines. <span style="background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not wikidrama]])</sub> 14:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270726 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 270725 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.251495780E09 +++$+++ Furthermore, this looks to me like a clear case of [[WP:GHBH]], which by definition is a violation of our sockpuppetry policy. <span style=\"background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;\"> +++$+++ ::*Furthermore, this looks to me like a clear case of [[WP:GHBH]], which by definition is a violation of our sockpuppetry policy. <span style="background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not wikidrama]])</sub> 14:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270727 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 270726 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.251496020E09 +++$+++ I don't see any evidence of [[WP:GHBH]], and neither do I believe that sockpuppets\u2014whether disclosed or not\u2014is necessarily a blocking offence. Many do so without being blocked, and have done so over extended periods of time. Even some ArbCom members. The length of this block seems disproportionate to the crime. -- +++$+++ :::*I don't see any evidence of [[WP:GHBH]], and neither do I believe that sockpuppets—whether disclosed or not—is necessarily a blocking offence. Many do so without being blocked, and have done so over extended periods of time. Even some ArbCom members. The length of this block seems disproportionate to the crime. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 14:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270728 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 270727 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.251496320E09 +++$+++ \"All users are proscribed from operating a \"bad hand\" account for the purpose of disruption or artificially stirring up controversy. It is never acceptable to keep one account \"clean\", while using another account to engage in disruptive behavior.\" In my opinion, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:CallMeNow&diff=prev&oldid=310469607 this] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:CallMeNow&diff=prev&oldid=310469795 this] are disruptive. <span style=\"background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;\"> +++$+++ ::::*"All users are proscribed from operating a "bad hand" account for the purpose of disruption or artificially stirring up controversy. It is never acceptable to keep one account "clean", while using another account to engage in disruptive behavior." In my opinion, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CallMeNow&diff=prev&oldid=310469607 this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CallMeNow&diff=prev&oldid=310469795 this] are disruptive. <span style="background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not wikidrama]])</sub> 14:52, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270729 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.251494760E09 +++$+++ The sockpuppetry and subsequent lame denials of such completely surprised me not in its stupidity and pettiness, but its direction at Bishonen of whom I have very little knowledge and negligible interaction. I have little opinion on the protocol for blocking sockpuppets, but I have quite strong opinions that this is but another example of a pattern of disruption of the sort the ArbCom case was opened on Mattisse in the first place. Mattisse has scores to settle, and it does not seem to matter what article improvement processes or Wikipedia policies are in place, because by God, she is out to settle them all. If Mattisse's mentors-turned-defenders impress the blocking admins enough to reduce or void the block, I'm fairly going to insist the ArbCom case be re-opened, even if I must do it myself. Mattisse's mentors need to start addressing this problematic behavior at once and not in private. She is her own worst enemy, self-defeating and projecting blame in all directions. Wikipedia is not for everyone. If Mattisse cannot let other editors alone, let her retirement stand, work with her earnestly to change her behavior, or block her for the 60-day period suggested by NewYorkBrad. -- +++$+++ *The sockpuppetry and subsequent lame denials of such completely surprised me not in its stupidity and pettiness, but its direction at Bishonen of whom I have very little knowledge and negligible interaction. I have little opinion on the protocol for blocking sockpuppets, but I have quite strong opinions that this is but another example of a pattern of disruption of the sort the ArbCom case was opened on Mattisse in the first place. Mattisse has scores to settle, and it does not seem to matter what article improvement processes or Wikipedia policies are in place, because by God, she is out to settle them all. If Mattisse's mentors-turned-defenders impress the blocking admins enough to reduce or void the block, I'm fairly going to insist the ArbCom case be re-opened, even if I must do it myself. Mattisse's mentors need to start addressing this problematic behavior at once and not in private. She is her own worst enemy, self-defeating and projecting blame in all directions. Wikipedia is not for everyone. If Mattisse cannot let other editors alone, let her retirement stand, work with her earnestly to change her behavior, or block her for the 60-day period suggested by NewYorkBrad. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 14:26, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270730 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 270729 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.251494940E09 +++$+++ Just to be clear, I am in no way defending what Mattisse has done. As I said, I think it was bloody stupid, and I was rather shocked at its pointless childishness. My only concern is that all editors are treated equally in such cases. -- +++$+++ **Just to be clear, I am in no way defending what Mattisse has done. As I said, I think it was bloody stupid, and I was rather shocked at its pointless childishness. My only concern is that all editors are treated equally in such cases. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 14:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270731 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 270720 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.251498300E09 +++$+++ Perhaps those posting against this block have forgotten (or never read or never understood) that checkuser evidence shows this to be a long-standing trend, not a new editing behavior for Mattisse ?  To use socks while under ArbCom sanction, when she has been CU verified as socking before, and against an editor with whom she has been in prior conflict surely warrants the two weeks.  More importantly, IMO ArbCom missed the boat in its first ruling by not recognizing that a short break (as suggested by NYB, which he did *not* call a block) is something that could be very good for Mattisse.  Mattisse, I urge you to take the time off, re-think your priorities, and enjoy the break.  I've always found that it takes more than a few days away from Wiki to be able to come back refreshed and renewed, and I hope you'll take that chance.  It could change your perspective.  Philcha, once again, you are doing Mattisse no favors by defending this behavior; she looks to you for guidance, and you continually turn a blind eye to the ongoing behaviors that lead to Mattisse's problems.   +++$+++ * Perhaps those posting against this block have forgotten (or never read or never understood) that checkuser evidence shows this to be a long-standing trend, not a new editing behavior for Mattisse ?  To use socks while under ArbCom sanction, when she has been CU verified as socking before, and against an editor with whom she has been in prior conflict surely warrants the two weeks.  More importantly, IMO ArbCom missed the boat in its first ruling by not recognizing that a short break (as suggested by NYB, which he did *not* call a block) is something that could be very good for Mattisse.  Mattisse, I urge you to take the time off, re-think your priorities, and enjoy the break.  I've always found that it takes more than a few days away from Wiki to be able to come back refreshed and renewed, and I hope you'll take that chance.  It could change your perspective.  Philcha, once again, you are doing Mattisse no favors by defending this behavior; she looks to you for guidance, and you continually turn a blind eye to the ongoing behaviors that lead to Mattisse's problems.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

8577 +++$+++ Arjun01 +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-11 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.171192500E09 +++$+++ Hey buddy, I just thought I would let you know that [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Arjun01|my RFA]] passed, and now I am an admin. Cheers! ~  +++$+++ Hey buddy, I just thought I would let you know that [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Arjun01|my RFA]] passed, and now I am an admin. Cheers! ~ [[User:Arjun01|<font color="#7b68ee">'''Arjun'''</font>]] 03:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
8578 +++$+++ Arjun01 +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8577 +++$+++ 8577 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.171269900E09 +++$+++ Thanks; I never doubted that you wouldn't leave. :), hope everything is well. Cheers! ~  +++$+++ :Thanks; I never doubted that you wouldn't leave. :), hope everything is well. Cheers! ~ [[User:Arjun01|<font color="#7b68ee">'''Arjun'''</font>]] 00:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
8579 +++$+++ AO +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8577 +++$+++ 8578 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.171403040E09 +++$+++ Sorry to interrupt, but have you noticed that [[Meta:Wikipedia is an MMORPG|Wikipedia is an MMORPG]]? I guess you guys are \"game masters\" now. :-) \xb7 [[User:AO|<font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"1\">'''A'''<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"DarkSlateGray\">ndonic<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"1\">'''O'''<\/font>]] <sup><font color=\"DarkSlateGray\">[[User talk:AO|''Talk'']]<\/font> \xb7 <font color=\"DarkSlateGray\"> +++$+++ ::Sorry to interrupt, but have you noticed that [[Meta:Wikipedia is an MMORPG|Wikipedia is an MMORPG]]? I guess you guys are "game masters" now. :-) · [[User:AO|<font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="1">'''A'''</font><font face="Papyrus" color="DarkSlateGray">ndonic</font><font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="1">'''O'''</font>]] <sup><font color="DarkSlateGray">[[User talk:AO|''Talk'']]</font> · <font color="DarkSlateGray">[[User:AO/My Autograph Book|''Sign Here'']]</font></sup> 13:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

532867 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-26 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.182871260E09 +++$+++ Your reply: : Hi. I will be glad to help you but you should tell me the name of the article. I have recently deleted 100+ articles so it may be a bit time consuming to find it. We will see what to do then. Regards. --''' +++$+++ Your reply: : Hi. I will be glad to help you but you should tell me the name of the article. I have recently deleted 100+ articles so it may be a bit time consuming to find it. We will see what to do then. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
532868 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532867 +++$+++ 532867 +++$+++ 2007-06-27 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.182960240E09 +++$+++ Hi. The problem is that the content was copied from a [http:\/\/www.geocities.com\/polishnobles\/Counts.html website]. If this is your website, everything is ok, you must just explicitly state that somewhere, preferably on the talkpage of the article. If you are not owner of the page, this is a violation of copyright and WP is pretty strict when it comes to this. So, if you are the owner, I can restore the article, no problem, but otherwise you have to write it with your own words. And don't forget to sign your posts on talkpages (use a button up there). Regards. --''' +++$+++ :Hi. The problem is that the content was copied from a [http://www.geocities.com/polishnobles/Counts.html website]. If this is your website, everything is ok, you must just explicitly state that somewhere, preferably on the talkpage of the article. If you are not owner of the page, this is a violation of copyright and WP is pretty strict when it comes to this. So, if you are the owner, I can restore the article, no problem, but otherwise you have to write it with your own words. And don't forget to sign your posts on talkpages (use a button up there). Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
532869 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532867 +++$+++ 532867 +++$+++ 2010-03-15 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.268705700E09 +++$+++ Hi. I see the article has just been deleted on the copyvio basis. The user who claimed the copyrights back in 2007 has not been active for more than a year and had just a couple of edits so I see no need for action here. I believe the problem is solved now. Best regards, --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I see the article has just been deleted on the copyvio basis. The user who claimed the copyrights back in 2007 has not been active for more than a year and had just a couple of edits so I see no need for action here. I believe the problem is solved now. Best regards, --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
532870 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532867 +++$+++ 532867 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.183070340E09 +++$+++ Hm.... it really reads like an advertisment to me... In fact, the article was accused of being created by the company's pr department. I'll restore it but I am leaving the advert tag on it until someone fixes it. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hm.... it really reads like an advertisment to me... In fact, the article was accused of being created by the company's pr department. I'll restore it but I am leaving the advert tag on it until someone fixes it. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
532871 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532867 +++$+++ 532867 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.183047000E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

532872 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532872 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-28 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.183062240E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I was curious about your speedy deletion of [[Bowflex Machine]].  I know absolutely nothing about exercise equipment and even I've heard the name Bowflex countless times and there seem to be reliable sources at the bottom.  If it was the spammy sound of the article that caused you to speedy it, I've tried to rectify that, but your deletion reason was [[WP:CSD#A7]] not [[WP:CSD#G11]].  Am I missing something?  That article had been edited over 150 times since 2004 so something seems amiss.  Let me know.  Thanks.  \u2014 +++$+++ Hi.  I was curious about your speedy deletion of [[Bowflex Machine]].  I know absolutely nothing about exercise equipment and even I've heard the name Bowflex countless times and there seem to be reliable sources at the bottom.  If it was the spammy sound of the article that caused you to speedy it, I've tried to rectify that, but your deletion reason was [[WP:CSD#A7]] not [[WP:CSD#G11]].  Am I missing something?  That article had been edited over 150 times since 2004 so something seems amiss.  Let me know.  Thanks.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 13:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
532873 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532872 +++$+++ 532872 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.183070340E09 +++$+++ I see you've already restored it. Seems that it was tagged with the wrong csd tag but I suppose the article is good enough to stay. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : I see you've already restored it. Seems that it was tagged with the wrong csd tag but I suppose the article is good enough to stay. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
532874 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532872 +++$+++ 532873 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.183072620E09 +++$+++ Spam was definitely an issue.  Notability isn't.  At the risk of falling into the [[WP:POKEMON]] trap, if obscure two-album bands from the 1980s can have articles, surely an internationally-known piece of gym equipment in a large percentage of the nation's gyms and owned by however many millions of people (and getting nearly [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&q=bowflex two million Google hits]) sufficiently establishes notability.  The 2004 recalls affected over 1.2 million machines which alone establishes a decent level of notability IMHO.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::Spam was definitely an issue.  Notability isn't.  At the risk of falling into the [[WP:POKEMON]] trap, if obscure two-album bands from the 1980s can have articles, surely an internationally-known piece of gym equipment in a large percentage of the nation's gyms and owned by however many millions of people (and getting nearly [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bowflex two million Google hits]) sufficiently establishes notability.  The 2004 recalls affected over 1.2 million machines which alone establishes a decent level of notability IMHO.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 16:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
532875 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532872 +++$+++ 532872 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.183158720E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. If you are building the article slowly, you can put a {{tl|under construction}} template on it to notify other users. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. If you are building the article slowly, you can put a {{tl|under construction}} template on it to notify other users. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

8586 +++$+++  T-borg +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8586 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-21 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.177212240E09 +++$+++ I'm having some trouble with the organisation of a new WikiProject, more specifically [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon Network|this one]]. Could you take a look at the situation and provide some help? \u2014<font color=\"Green\">'''''May the Edit be with you, always.'''''<\/font> <small> +++$+++ I'm having some trouble with the organisation of a new WikiProject, more specifically [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon Network|this one]]. Could you take a look at the situation and provide some help? —<font color="Green">'''''May the Edit be with you, always.'''''</font> <small>[[User: T-borg|<font color="Green">('''''T-borg''''')</font>]]</small> [[User talk: T-borg|<sup><font color="Orange">(drop me a line)</font></sup>]] 20:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
8587 +++$+++  T-borg +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8586 +++$+++ 8586 +++$+++ 2007-04-21 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.177223220E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Um, specific areas, just check out the talk page, you'll see what I'm talking about. \u2014<font color=\"Green\">'''''May the Edit be with you, always.'''''<\/font> <small> +++$+++ :Thanks. Um, specific areas, just check out the talk page, you'll see what I'm talking about. —<font color="Green">'''''May the Edit be with you, always.'''''</font> <small>[[User: T-borg|<font color="Green">('''''T-borg''''')</font>]]</small> [[User talk: T-borg|<sup><font color="Orange">(drop me a line)</font></sup>]] 23:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

270732 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270732 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.251486420E09 +++$+++ Please provide proof of your charges. &mdash; +++$+++ Please provide proof of your charges. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:07, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270733 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270732 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.251456240E09 +++$+++ [[User:Bishapod|Little friends]] should always be protected. ;)  +++$+++ ::[[User:Bishapod|Little friends]] should always be protected. ;) [[User:Ched Davis|The silent one]] 03:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270734 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270732 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.251468720E09 +++$+++ [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse&diff=310483370&oldid=310482229 Confirmed].\u2014 ''' +++$+++ ::[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse&diff=310483370&oldid=310482229 Confirmed].— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 07:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

8589 +++$+++ joshuajohnlee +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-30 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.177991580E09 +++$+++ Could you please explain to me how to link a category to a userbox, as in, if you use a userbox on your user page, you are put in such a category? [[user:joshuajohnlee|Josh Lee]]<sub> +++$+++ Could you please explain to me how to link a category to a userbox, as in, if you use a userbox on your user page, you are put in such a category? [[user:joshuajohnlee|Josh Lee]]<sub>[[user:joshuajohnlee|PAGE]]|[[user_talk:joshuajohnlee|TALK]]</sub> 20:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
8590 +++$+++ joshuajohnlee +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8589 +++$+++ 8589 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.178378880E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, your reply did help. :)  +++$+++ : Thank you very much, your reply did help. :) [[user:joshuajohnlee|Josh Lee]]<sub>[[user_talk:joshuajohnlee|TALK]]</sub> 08:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

532879 +++$+++ Runnersdialzero33 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532879 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-28 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.191035700E09 +++$+++ You deleted my page about the [[Fall Out Boy]] song entitled \"[[I Liked You a Whole Lot Better Before You Became a Fucking MySpace Whore]]\" without even so much as giving ANY kind of warning. NO fucking warning, and you claim it was \"pure speculation\". If you wanted sources, I have them, the song has been discussed in countless interviews with the band. If you wanted sources, you could have asked. So thanks.  +++$+++ You deleted my page about the [[Fall Out Boy]] song entitled "[[I Liked You a Whole Lot Better Before You Became a Fucking MySpace Whore]]" without even so much as giving ANY kind of warning. NO fucking warning, and you claim it was "pure speculation". If you wanted sources, I have them, the song has been discussed in countless interviews with the band. If you wanted sources, you could have asked. So thanks. [[User:Runnersdialzero33|Runnersdialzero33]] 20:15, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
532880 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532879 +++$+++ 532879 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.191035940E09 +++$+++ The article was tagged with proposed deletion template a couple of days before it got deleted. Since noone objected, the deletion was a standard procedure. If you think you can improve the article, you are welcome to rewrite it and mind the concerns because of which it got tagged in the first place. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : The article was tagged with proposed deletion template a couple of days before it got deleted. Since noone objected, the deletion was a standard procedure. If you think you can improve the article, you are welcome to rewrite it and mind the concerns because of which it got tagged in the first place. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

270736 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.251495180E09 +++$+++ I though I was just doing what Geogre and Bishonem do all the time - use sockpuppets in a \"playful\" manner. I was making a joke about Bishonen's sock with a tiny little sock. But I am not in the \"in\" crowd at Wikipedia.   &mdash; +++$+++ I though I was just doing what Geogre and Bishonem do all the time - use sockpuppets in a "playful" manner. I was making a joke about Bishonen's sock with a tiny little sock. But I am not in the "in" crowd at Wikipedia.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:33, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270737 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270736 +++$+++ 270736 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.251495780E09 +++$+++ The best that can be said about your sockpuppets is that you displayed rather poor judgement in setting them up in the present climate. What on Earth were you thinking of? -- +++$+++ :The best that can be said about your sockpuppets is that you displayed rather poor judgement in setting them up in the present climate. What on Earth were you thinking of? --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 14:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270738 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270736 +++$+++ 270737 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.251496020E09 +++$+++ I too tend to agree that some of the names, which while not as obvious as \"Bishzilla\", were ones which many people would have fairly quickly recognized, and would have been fairly easily obvious to most people, particularly those directly involved. I'm not sure that the specific actions were appropriate, like adding the links on the top of someone's talk page to what are said to be alternate accounts, but at the same time I have very real trouble seeing how they were really worthy of any sort of block. This belief is, yes, at least in part based on the fact that Geogre, who admitted to using a multiple account for some time, wasn't blocked for it. Blocking or closing the alternate accounts to me seems reasonable, but I don't think that a two week block on the primary is necessarily called for in this instance, based on the information visible to me.  +++$+++ ::I too tend to agree that some of the names, which while not as obvious as "Bishzilla", were ones which many people would have fairly quickly recognized, and would have been fairly easily obvious to most people, particularly those directly involved. I'm not sure that the specific actions were appropriate, like adding the links on the top of someone's talk page to what are said to be alternate accounts, but at the same time I have very real trouble seeing how they were really worthy of any sort of block. This belief is, yes, at least in part based on the fact that Geogre, who admitted to using a multiple account for some time, wasn't blocked for it. Blocking or closing the alternate accounts to me seems reasonable, but I don't think that a two week block on the primary is necessarily called for in this instance, based on the information visible to me. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 14:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270739 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270736 +++$+++ 270738 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.251497280E09 +++$+++ I thought it was a joke. I don't know what the rules are. [[User:Bishonen]] can have [[User:Little Toxic Personality]] so I had [[User:Big Toxic Personality]]. [[User:Bishonen]] has [[User:Toxic Avenger]] so I had [[User:CallMeNow]] to make a point about socks. I find the using of socks offensive, I wanted to make that point. But I am not allowed to do what others regularly do. There are specially harsh rules for me that do not apply to others. That is what I am thinking of.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::*I thought it was a joke. I don't know what the rules are. [[User:Bishonen]] can have [[User:Little Toxic Personality]] so I had [[User:Big Toxic Personality]]. [[User:Bishonen]] has [[User:Toxic Avenger]] so I had [[User:CallMeNow]] to make a point about socks. I find the using of socks offensive, I wanted to make that point. But I am not allowed to do what others regularly do. There are specially harsh rules for me that do not apply to others. That is what I am thinking of.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270740 +++$+++ Chillum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270736 +++$+++ 270738 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.251497460E09 +++$+++ That really is the issue, you made your point in a disruptive fashion. What sort of logic makes it okay to use a sock puppet to discourage sock puppetry? Think about it, any point you may have had, regardless of validity, is discredited by the hypocrisy of your methods.  +++$+++ :::That really is the issue, you made your point in a disruptive fashion. What sort of logic makes it okay to use a sock puppet to discourage sock puppetry? Think about it, any point you may have had, regardless of validity, is discredited by the hypocrisy of your methods. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color='#4F7212'>'''Chillum'''</font>]] 15:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270741 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270736 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.251500100E09 +++$+++ [[User talk:Chillum|Chillum]], you posted hostile comments at [[User talk:CallMeNow]] ''after'' [[User:CallMeNow]] was blocked from editing [[User talk:CallMeNow]]. You may not have realised [[User:CallMeNow]] was blocked from [[User talk:CallMeNow]], but your actions could be interpreted as cowardly. If you want anyone to pay attention to your opinions and for the sake of your own reputation, I suggest you retract those remarks. -- +++$+++ :::::[[User talk:Chillum|Chillum]], you posted hostile comments at [[User talk:CallMeNow]] ''after'' [[User:CallMeNow]] was blocked from editing [[User talk:CallMeNow]]. You may not have realised [[User:CallMeNow]] was blocked from [[User talk:CallMeNow]], but your actions could be interpreted as cowardly. If you want anyone to pay attention to your opinions and for the sake of your own reputation, I suggest you retract those remarks. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 15:55, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270742 +++$+++ Chillum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270736 +++$+++ 270738 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.251500400E09 +++$+++ I will gladly discuss this matter with you on my talk page Philcha.  +++$+++ :::I will gladly discuss this matter with you on my talk page Philcha. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color='#606B12'>'''Chillum'''</font>]] 16:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270743 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270736 +++$+++ 270742 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.251498300E09 +++$+++ I am thinking about it. Ohers do the same thing, make disruptive points with their sockpuppets, I thought that was the \"playful\" way to do it. That is the way it is regarded when others do it. I made a few quite harmless edits to make a point, as I have watched all the sockpuppeting go on and condoned. I have made my dislike of sockpuppets known and really do not understand why they are allowed for the elite editors. How is anyone able to understand the rules around here?  How was I to know I would be treated differently? Was what I did worse that Geogre. Yet he was treated better. Never blocked at all. Because Geogre was even allowed to keep his alternate account. It was unblocked so he could, even though he had used it abusively. That is why I am confused. Was I more disruptive than Geogre or the many others who do it while admins look the other way? Why not look the other way for me too? I don't get it. I really do not. I made a few harmless edits that I will now accept as poor judgment, but at the time they merely seemed like the sockpuppeting edits I see all the time by others. &mdash; +++$+++ :::: I am thinking about it. Ohers do the same thing, make disruptive points with their sockpuppets, I thought that was the "playful" way to do it. That is the way it is regarded when others do it. I made a few quite harmless edits to make a point, as I have watched all the sockpuppeting go on and condoned. I have made my dislike of sockpuppets known and really do not understand why they are allowed for the elite editors. How is anyone able to understand the rules around here?  How was I to know I would be treated differently? Was what I did worse that Geogre. Yet he was treated better. Never blocked at all. Because Geogre was even allowed to keep his alternate account. It was unblocked so he could, even though he had used it abusively. That is why I am confused. Was I more disruptive than Geogre or the many others who do it while admins look the other way? Why not look the other way for me too? I don't get it. I really do not. I made a few harmless edits that I will now accept as poor judgment, but at the time they merely seemed like the sockpuppeting edits I see all the time by others. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270744 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270736 +++$+++ 270743 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.251498840E09 +++$+++ \"He's done it as well, so why pick on me\" is probably just about the worst defence you could mount Mattisse. You do not occupy the moral high ground by aping the behaviours that you claim to be protesting against. -- +++$+++ :::::"He's done it as well, so why pick on me" is probably just about the worst defence you could mount Mattisse. You do not occupy the moral high ground by aping the behaviours that you claim to be protesting against. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 15:34, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

532881 +++$+++ Runnersdialzero33 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-03 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.191462840E09 +++$+++ Understood, kind gentleman. Thank you very much.  +++$+++ Understood, kind gentleman. Thank you very much. [[User:Runnersdialzero33|Runnersdialzero33]] 18:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
532882 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532881 +++$+++ 532881 +++$+++ 2007-09-23 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.190605080E09 +++$+++ Ok, I will restore it but please provide all the things that resulted in this article's deletion, otherwise it may be deleted again. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : Ok, I will restore it but please provide all the things that resulted in this article's deletion, otherwise it may be deleted again. Regards, --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
532883 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532881 +++$+++ 532881 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.183158720E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. If you are building the article slowly, you can put a {{tl|under construction}} template on it to notify other users. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. If you are building the article slowly, you can put a {{tl|under construction}} template on it to notify other users. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

532884 +++$+++ Grandpafootsoldier +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-29 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.183169220E09 +++$+++ Why did you delete this article? It seems to me to be a perfectly noteworthy documentary film. It just hasn't been released so far so there is as yet not much to fill out the page. Thanks for your help. --  +++$+++ Why did you delete this article? It seems to me to be a perfectly noteworthy documentary film. It just hasn't been released so far so there is as yet not much to fill out the page. Thanks for your help. -- [[User:Grandpafootsoldier|Grandpafootsoldier]] 19:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
532885 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532884 +++$+++ 532884 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.183173480E09 +++$+++ It was tagged as not asserting notability. I guess we can restore it once it is released. Usually at the WP there are no articles about forthcoming films or books, with exceptions like the new Potter book and film. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : It was tagged as not asserting notability. I guess we can restore it once it is released. Usually at the WP there are no articles about forthcoming films or books, with exceptions like the new Potter book and film. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
532886 +++$+++ Grandpafootsoldier +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532884 +++$+++ 532885 +++$+++ 2007-06-30 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.183207380E09 +++$+++ Um, I'm positive that's not true. Why is there the {{tl|Future film}} template specifically for upcoming films then? Whoever made that page just failed to put that in. Also, it obviously wasn't tagged for very long as I just looked at it a couple days ago and didn't see it marked for notability. Maybe you should hold off a bit on deleting pages so fast in the future. Thanks. --  +++$+++ ::Um, I'm positive that's not true. Why is there the {{tl|Future film}} template specifically for upcoming films then? Whoever made that page just failed to put that in. Also, it obviously wasn't tagged for very long as I just looked at it a couple days ago and didn't see it marked for notability. Maybe you should hold off a bit on deleting pages so fast in the future. Thanks. -- [[User:Grandpafootsoldier|Grandpafootsoldier]] 05:43, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
532887 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532884 +++$+++ 532886 +++$+++ 2007-06-30 09:07:00 +++$+++ 1.183219620E09 +++$+++ Sure, there is a future film template. But I think its use is justified only when the upcoming film is notable in one way in another. Otherwise the WP would become a place for announcements and this is against [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. Of course, if you can state the notability and provide sources for the film we talk about, there is no problem. Regards. --''' +++$+++ ::: Sure, there is a future film template. But I think its use is justified only when the upcoming film is notable in one way in another. Otherwise the WP would become a place for announcements and this is against [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. Of course, if you can state the notability and provide sources for the film we talk about, there is no problem. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

270745 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.251499740E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, of course people have reasons and explanations for doing things. When we lash out in frustration at something, it appears to us at the time that we have a valid reason for doing it. Later, when people point out that we were wrong, we learn not to do it again. By creating the CallMeNow account and saying [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:CallMeNow&direction=next&oldid=310469607 this], you were misbehaving. It was an inappropriate thing to do, and in doing that you have created drama, been offensive to another user, let yourself and others down (I feel somewhat embarrassed that I have defended and still defend you when you do things like that), and you have distracted from our main purpose and what you are so good at, and that is building the encyclopedia. What I'd like to see you do now is stop making excuses for your action - take responsibility, realise you did an inappropriate thing, apologize for what you have done and reassure us you won't do it again. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ Mattisse, of course people have reasons and explanations for doing things. When we lash out in frustration at something, it appears to us at the time that we have a valid reason for doing it. Later, when people point out that we were wrong, we learn not to do it again. By creating the CallMeNow account and saying [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CallMeNow&direction=next&oldid=310469607 this], you were misbehaving. It was an inappropriate thing to do, and in doing that you have created drama, been offensive to another user, let yourself and others down (I feel somewhat embarrassed that I have defended and still defend you when you do things like that), and you have distracted from our main purpose and what you are so good at, and that is building the encyclopedia. What I'd like to see you do now is stop making excuses for your action - take responsibility, realise you did an inappropriate thing, apologize for what you have done and reassure us you won't do it again. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 15:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270746 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270745 +++$+++ 270745 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.251500040E09 +++$+++ Agreed on all points.  +++$+++ :Agreed on all points. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 15:54, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270747 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270745 +++$+++ 270745 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.251502740E09 +++$+++ I am very sorry I let you and others down. I was not lashing out in frustration, however. That was not my emotion. Really, I thought of it as a playful trick. I understand that others do not see it that way. I had no reason to \"lash out in frustration\". Maybe \"lashing out\" in discouragement. I have never had interactions with Bishonen. I have been watching all the sockpuppeting and wanted to make a point. I really did not think it was a serious act that would bring about this type of punishment. I also though warnings had to precede blocks. The fact that I have let you down means I should not be editing at Wikipedia. I have been trying very hard and I have failed.  I am very sorry for that. I failed, not because I was \"lashing out\" but because I really do not understand the rules.  The community did not follow my ArbCom plan so it was hopeless anyway. I thought the plan was supportive and would help me understand these finer points that I do not seem to get, but in the end I was not protected from arbitrary punishment.   So I am gone from Wikipedia. I can hever hold my head up here again after this. I do have some pride and I have tried to do a good job and further the encyclopedia. But I have failed. To be honest, I am not capable of doing much  better than I was doing. I will always make mistakes. If my plan did not work, if I am blocked for two weeks over what I did, then  I am unfit to be here and cannot continue.  &mdash; +++$+++ *I am very sorry I let you and others down. I was not lashing out in frustration, however. That was not my emotion. Really, I thought of it as a playful trick. I understand that others do not see it that way. I had no reason to "lash out in frustration". Maybe "lashing out" in discouragement. I have never had interactions with Bishonen. I have been watching all the sockpuppeting and wanted to make a point. I really did not think it was a serious act that would bring about this type of punishment. I also though warnings had to precede blocks. The fact that I have let you down means I should not be editing at Wikipedia. I have been trying very hard and I have failed.  I am very sorry for that. I failed, not because I was "lashing out" but because I really do not understand the rules.  The community did not follow my ArbCom plan so it was hopeless anyway. I thought the plan was supportive and would help me understand these finer points that I do not seem to get, but in the end I was not protected from arbitrary punishment.   So I am gone from Wikipedia. I can hever hold my head up here again after this. I do have some pride and I have tried to do a good job and further the encyclopedia. But I have failed. To be honest, I am not capable of doing much  better than I was doing. I will always make mistakes. If my plan did not work, if I am blocked for two weeks over what I did, then  I am unfit to be here and cannot continue.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:39, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270748 +++$+++ Chillum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270745 +++$+++ 270745 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.251503340E09 +++$+++ Another course of action would be to wait out the two weeks, and perhaps wait a bit longer if you think it prudent, and then come back and resume your good work here. You are not perfect, and the system is not perfect either. It is a fact that some people on Wikipedia do indeed get special treatment, and while I don't agree with your methods, or for that matter your targets, I do agree that there is some validity to the claim of a double standard. I would very much like it if you asked me to replace the {{tl|retired}} tag on your user page with a {{tl|wikibreak}} tag.  +++$+++ :Another course of action would be to wait out the two weeks, and perhaps wait a bit longer if you think it prudent, and then come back and resume your good work here. You are not perfect, and the system is not perfect either. It is a fact that some people on Wikipedia do indeed get special treatment, and while I don't agree with your methods, or for that matter your targets, I do agree that there is some validity to the claim of a double standard. I would very much like it if you asked me to replace the {{tl|retired}} tag on your user page with a {{tl|wikibreak}} tag. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color='#6F6513'>'''Chillum'''</font>]] 16:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270749 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270745 +++$+++ 270745 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.251504000E09 +++$+++ I think that Chillum is probably offering good advice. Although I believe that the punishment is excessive for the crime, it's apparent that a significant body of others do not, and that if the block length is reduced then the ArbCom case is quite likely to be reopened, which would certainly not have a good outcome for you Mattisse. Some of us have to be more careful in what we do than others, who are given more leeway; just the way it is. I can't change that, you can't change that. -- +++$+++ :I think that Chillum is probably offering good advice. Although I believe that the punishment is excessive for the crime, it's apparent that a significant body of others do not, and that if the block length is reduced then the ArbCom case is quite likely to be reopened, which would certainly not have a good outcome for you Mattisse. Some of us have to be more careful in what we do than others, who are given more leeway; just the way it is. I can't change that, you can't change that. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 17:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270750 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270745 +++$+++ 270749 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.251504480E09 +++$+++ No. Why I remained after the ArbCom was that ArbCom realized that I had been treated unfairly, that it was a two-way street and it was not my behavior that was entirely at fault but others also. They said I had been baited. They noted in their decision that even during the ArbCom, certain editors continued to \"snipe\" at me. They were trying to protect me from this type of arbitrary punishment and heckling I was receiving before by providing me with mentor\/advisers in my plan [[User:Mattisse\/Plan]]. The fact that ArbCom and the plan could not protect me means it is hopeless.  But thank you for your thoughts.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::No. Why I remained after the ArbCom was that ArbCom realized that I had been treated unfairly, that it was a two-way street and it was not my behavior that was entirely at fault but others also. They said I had been baited. They noted in their decision that even during the ArbCom, certain editors continued to "snipe" at me. They were trying to protect me from this type of arbitrary punishment and heckling I was receiving before by providing me with mentor/advisers in my plan [[User:Mattisse/Plan]]. The fact that ArbCom and the plan could not protect me means it is hopeless.  But thank you for your thoughts.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270751 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270745 +++$+++ 270750 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.251504900E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid that your persistent misrepresentation of the events at and surroundoing that ArbCom case are at the root of your ongoing problems. No rational person would come to the conclusions that you have about what ArbCom recognised, or that they were in any way trying to protect you from anything. I'm very much afraid that until you hold your hand up and admit that you have been at least as much at fault as those you believe have been \"sniping\" at you\u2014with no \"ifs\", \"buts\", or \"it wasn't really my fault, I was provoked\"s\u2014the situation is hopeless, and you ''will'' end up being banned. -- +++$+++ :::I'm afraid that your persistent misrepresentation of the events at and surroundoing that ArbCom case are at the root of your ongoing problems. No rational person would come to the conclusions that you have about what ArbCom recognised, or that they were in any way trying to protect you from anything. I'm very much afraid that until you hold your hand up and admit that you have been at least as much at fault as those you believe have been "sniping" at you—with no "ifs", "buts", or "it wasn't really my fault, I was provoked"s—the situation is hopeless, and you ''will'' end up being banned. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 17:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270752 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270745 +++$+++ 270751 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.251506460E09 +++$+++ You could always take the time off to have a break from this place, which something most of us need regularly. I know for myself there are a rather distressingly large number of items from [[The Teaching Company]] I would like to access. You could always do something like that. Alternately, if you still wanted to spend the time doing something related to this site, maybe working on developing one of our less impressive articles might be the best way to spend the period, as it would give you a bit of a break from your routine.  +++$+++ ::::You could always take the time off to have a break from this place, which something most of us need regularly. I know for myself there are a rather distressingly large number of items from [[The Teaching Company]] I would like to access. You could always do something like that. Alternately, if you still wanted to spend the time doing something related to this site, maybe working on developing one of our less impressive articles might be the best way to spend the period, as it would give you a bit of a break from your routine. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 17:41, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

532890 +++$+++ Andrejj +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-03 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.183513440E09 +++$+++ Prosim poglej in popravi\/dopolni: [[Ivan Bratko]]. -- +++$+++ Prosim poglej in popravi/dopolni: [[Ivan Bratko]]. --[[User:Andrejj|AndrejJ]] 18:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
532891 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532890 +++$+++ 532890 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.183070340E09 +++$+++ Hm.... it really reads like an advertisment to me... In fact, the article was accused of being created by the company's pr department. I'll restore it but I am leaving the advert tag on it until someone fixes it. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hm.... it really reads like an advertisment to me... In fact, the article was accused of being created by the company's pr department. I'll restore it but I am leaving the advert tag on it until someone fixes it. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

8603 +++$+++ Alex 8194 +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8603 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-08 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.215509760E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Alex 8194|Mr Alex]] ([[User talk:Alex 8194|talk]]) 02:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
8604 +++$+++ Deamon138 +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8603 +++$+++ 8603 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.215573600E09 +++$+++ He's right you know, he asked me at least, so has seeked other users opinions.  +++$+++ :He's right you know, he asked me at least, so has seeked other users opinions. [[User:Deamon138|Deamon138]] ([[User talk:Deamon138|talk]]) 20:20, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

532892 +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-14 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.184448360E09 +++$+++ A {{[[Template:prod|prod]]}} template has been added to the article [[List of Slovenian footballers]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion|criteria for inclusion]], and the deletion notice explains why (see also \"[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]\" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]).  You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}<\/nowiki><\/code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:List of Slovenian footballers|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.  +++$+++ A {{[[Template:prod|prod]]}} template has been added to the article [[List of Slovenian footballers]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion|criteria for inclusion]], and the deletion notice explains why (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]).  You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:List of Slovenian footballers|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached. [[User:Jogurney|Jogurney]] 14:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
532893 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532892 +++$+++ 532892 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.187644020E09 +++$+++ Support deletion. Too many lists... --''' +++$+++ : Support deletion. Too many lists... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

532895 +++$+++ Sergey shandar +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-24 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.185266340E09 +++$+++ Why did you delete the [[Ratbag Games]] article? The article is about a company that doesn't exist any more so it can not be advertisement. Wikipedia itself has a lot of links to the article http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Whatlinkshere\/Ratbag_Games. -- +++$+++ Why did you delete the [[Ratbag Games]] article? The article is about a company that doesn't exist any more so it can not be advertisement. Wikipedia itself has a lot of links to the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/Ratbag_Games. --[[User:Sergey shandar|Sergey Shandar]] 01:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
532896 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532895 +++$+++ 532895 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.187644020E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. Regards, --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

270753 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.251508380E09 +++$+++ Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270754 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270753 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.251509040E09 +++$+++ \"''I think the blocking admin is one of those protecting that special group ... I believe he will not reduce the block, as probably it is in revenge for my speaking up at Geogre's ArbCom and makes Giano happy.''\" For Christ's sake Mattisse, you're just not getting it, are you. There you go making more accusations against all and sundry when you need to be showing some understanding that what you have done is unacceptable. So what if someone else is doing it as well, without being similarly punished? Does that excuse your behaviour? No it fucking doesn't. You either have to shape up or ship out now, there are no other options. -- +++$+++ :*"''I think the blocking admin is one of those protecting that special group ... I believe he will not reduce the block, as probably it is in revenge for my speaking up at Geogre's ArbCom and makes Giano happy.''" For Christ's sake Mattisse, you're just not getting it, are you. There you go making more accusations against all and sundry when you need to be showing some understanding that what you have done is unacceptable. So what if someone else is doing it as well, without being similarly punished? Does that excuse your behaviour? No it fucking doesn't. You either have to shape up or ship out now, there are no other options. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 18:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

270756 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.251506280E09 +++$+++ The sniping has started up in the last weeks, even personal attacks and uncivil comments by others. They broke the rules above but I did not. I have not engaged in the above behaviors to my knowledge, and if close, I have followed my mentor's advice. Making a joking sockpuppet statement was \"impolitic\" and very poor judgment, but it was not made with malice by rather to make fun. I am not malicious like some of the statements made to and about me lately. And I have not sniped, as others do to me. There are those who will not rest until I am gone.  They want things their way and occasionally I have a different opinion, so I must be denigrated and snuffed out.  ArbCom was trying to level the playing field, but they could not do it. It is too bad, but I see there is to much of network out to get me and it is hopeless. There is nothing I can do to stop this. This incident drains all hope.  &mdash; +++$+++ The sniping has started up in the last weeks, even personal attacks and uncivil comments by others. They broke the rules above but I did not. I have not engaged in the above behaviors to my knowledge, and if close, I have followed my mentor's advice. Making a joking sockpuppet statement was "impolitic" and very poor judgment, but it was not made with malice by rather to make fun. I am not malicious like some of the statements made to and about me lately. And I have not sniped, as others do to me. There are those who will not rest until I am gone.  They want things their way and occasionally I have a different opinion, so I must be denigrated and snuffed out.  ArbCom was trying to level the playing field, but they could not do it. It is too bad, but I see there is to much of network out to get me and it is hopeless. There is nothing I can do to stop this. This incident drains all hope.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270757 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270756 +++$+++ 270756 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.251508200E09 +++$+++ None of these could remotely be construed as \"playful\" or \"joking\". You used sockpuppets to cast these aspersions, then acted evasively when called on it, and finally offered unnamed and uncited \"attacks\" on you as justification. Your statement that others \"broke the rules but I did not\" suggests that you see nothing problematic in your actions. I see that your mentors have raised some of these concerns above. I am strongly opposed to shortening this block, to the point that I would strongly encourage any admin considering doing so to submit the matter for community review before acting. If there is reason to think that this sort of thing will continue after the 2-week block expires, then I will raise the issue with the Arbitration Committee. This is unhealthy. ''' +++$+++ :None of these could remotely be construed as "playful" or "joking". You used sockpuppets to cast these aspersions, then acted evasively when called on it, and finally offered unnamed and uncited "attacks" on you as justification. Your statement that others "broke the rules but I did not" suggests that you see nothing problematic in your actions. I see that your mentors have raised some of these concerns above. I am strongly opposed to shortening this block, to the point that I would strongly encourage any admin considering doing so to submit the matter for community review before acting. If there is reason to think that this sort of thing will continue after the 2-week block expires, then I will raise the issue with the Arbitration Committee. This is unhealthy. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 18:10, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270758 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.251510180E09 +++$+++ I do see my sockpuppets are problematic. I admit that the sockpuppet was extremely ill considered and I regret it. Because I saw so many sockpuppets, with some users knowing and some not, I did not think it was a big deal. Geogre used his to harass and stack opinion, and apparently many in the community knew he was doing it.  He was not even blocked for the sockpuppeting. In fact, his alternate account, the sockpuppet was unblocked so he could continue to use it. I was harmed by his alternate accounts over time as I explained at his ArbCom. So it never occurred to me that what I did was that serious. If my block is not reduced, I will not be back editing on Wikipedia. You have my word on this.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::* I do see my sockpuppets are problematic. I admit that the sockpuppet was extremely ill considered and I regret it. Because I saw so many sockpuppets, with some users knowing and some not, I did not think it was a big deal. Geogre used his to harass and stack opinion, and apparently many in the community knew he was doing it.  He was not even blocked for the sockpuppeting. In fact, his alternate account, the sockpuppet was unblocked so he could continue to use it. I was harmed by his alternate accounts over time as I explained at his ArbCom. So it never occurred to me that what I did was that serious. If my block is not reduced, I will not be back editing on Wikipedia. You have my word on this.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270759 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.251511680E09 +++$+++ You perceived Geogre's alternate account as deeply inappropriate and hurtful ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FMotions&diff=303792297&oldid=303788067]). You also expressed concern at other accounts which you believed to be sockpuppets targeting you ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Motions&diff=304101297&oldid=304088704]). Obviously, you consider such a practice reprehensible when directed at you. It therefore rings false that you thought it was \"no big deal\" to target someone else in this fashion.<p>Additionally, you were asked one month ago to [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse&diff=304532081&oldid=304513834 \"stay well away from any discussions related to Geogre\/Giano\/Bishonen\"]. You agreed to do so ([https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=next&oldid=304532081]). Your subsequent use of sockpuppets to target these editors renders your agreement meaningless at best. It also calls into question the value of your commitments to amend your behavior, which tend to be made only under duress to begin with. ''' +++$+++ :::* You perceived Geogre's alternate account as deeply inappropriate and hurtful ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FMotions&diff=303792297&oldid=303788067]). You also expressed concern at other accounts which you believed to be sockpuppets targeting you ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions&diff=304101297&oldid=304088704]). Obviously, you consider such a practice reprehensible when directed at you. It therefore rings false that you thought it was "no big deal" to target someone else in this fashion.<p>Additionally, you were asked one month ago to [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse&diff=304532081&oldid=304513834 "stay well away from any discussions related to Geogre/Giano/Bishonen"]. You agreed to do so ([https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=next&oldid=304532081]). Your subsequent use of sockpuppets to target these editors renders your agreement meaningless at best. It also calls into question the value of your commitments to amend your behavior, which tend to be made only under duress to begin with. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 19:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270760 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.251514740E09 +++$+++ Geogre's alternate account played a large role in my problems at FAR and thus, over time was partly responsible for  ArbCom on me. That was why it was hurtful, all the more so as the other players of the game knew who he was. His alternate account harmed me in several different situations and made me look bad, so that others piled on against me.  The sockpuppet gang who targeted me did so over more that a six month period, started and RFC against me, too man AN\/I's too count, resulted in several mediations, and ultimately let me to an ArbCom in which YellowMonkey caught the pack of them. Meanwhile I had such a bad rap from all these groundless accusations, and was unjustly blocked because of sockpuppet complaints, that in every situation from then on I was assumed to be wrong. That is the baggage that led me today. So, yes, I saw Bishonen's \"playful\" socks aimed at Jimmy Wales as in somewhat different category as I did mine, which was a one time deal. Of course, as I realized yesterday,  Geogre (whose arbcom I provided evidence in), Giano, and Bishonen are are all together. I just didn't connect the dots until yesterday. But perhaps Bishonen's and mine are in the same category as Geogre and the sock pack. And  I guess I am being punished for the Giano, Bishonen, Geogre connect. In any event, I most likely will not be editing, as my block is unlikely to be reduced and you see all the nastiness. Though people keep telling me I am one of the most productive editors on Wikipedia, and one of the most helpful, there are editors dedicated to destroy me. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::*Geogre's alternate account played a large role in my problems at FAR and thus, over time was partly responsible for  ArbCom on me. That was why it was hurtful, all the more so as the other players of the game knew who he was. His alternate account harmed me in several different situations and made me look bad, so that others piled on against me.  The sockpuppet gang who targeted me did so over more that a six month period, started and RFC against me, too man AN/I's too count, resulted in several mediations, and ultimately let me to an ArbCom in which YellowMonkey caught the pack of them. Meanwhile I had such a bad rap from all these groundless accusations, and was unjustly blocked because of sockpuppet complaints, that in every situation from then on I was assumed to be wrong. That is the baggage that led me today. So, yes, I saw Bishonen's "playful" socks aimed at Jimmy Wales as in somewhat different category as I did mine, which was a one time deal. Of course, as I realized yesterday,  Geogre (whose arbcom I provided evidence in), Giano, and Bishonen are are all together. I just didn't connect the dots until yesterday. But perhaps Bishonen's and mine are in the same category as Geogre and the sock pack. And  I guess I am being punished for the Giano, Bishonen, Geogre connect. In any event, I most likely will not be editing, as my block is unlikely to be reduced and you see all the nastiness. Though people keep telling me I am one of the most productive editors on Wikipedia, and one of the most helpful, there are editors dedicated to destroy me. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:59, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

219889 +++$+++ Jarkeld +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-21 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.287684420E09 +++$+++ Hi, If it is your intent to re-nominate for deletion, please open up a new afd.  +++$+++ Hi, If it is your intent to re-nominate for deletion, please open up a new afd. [[User:Jarkeld|Jarkeld]] ([[User talk:Jarkeld|talk]]) 11:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
219890 +++$+++ Muhandes +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219889 +++$+++ 219889 +++$+++ 2010-10-21 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.287693600E09 +++$+++ Just noticed the same issue, and wanted to also say that you have to go through the entire procedure in [[WP:AfD]], including for instance adding the page to the log, otherwise the request will be ignored.-- +++$+++ : Just noticed the same issue, and wanted to also say that you have to go through the entire procedure in [[WP:AfD]], including for instance adding the page to the log, otherwise the request will be ignored.--[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]) 13:40, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
219891 +++$+++ Muhandes +++$+++ NickOrnstein +++$+++ 219889 +++$+++ 219890 +++$+++ 2010-10-21 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.287707820E09 +++$+++ Hi again. Just letting you know that proposal still was not done according to the procedure in [[WP:AfD]]. It's pretty simple to follow, but unfortunately if not all steps are followed, the request is typically ignored. If you were simply planning to do the other steps a bit later, ignore this. Best regards. -- +++$+++ :: Hi again. Just letting you know that proposal still was not done according to the procedure in [[WP:AfD]]. It's pretty simple to follow, but unfortunately if not all steps are followed, the request is typically ignored. If you were simply planning to do the other steps a bit later, ignore this. Best regards. --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]) 17:37, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

270761 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-29 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.251531420E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 00:37, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
270762 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270761 +++$+++ 270761 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.251532560E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your advice. I thought I had made an apology but I will do it again; I have certainly made it by email. I regret deeply the foolish act of sock-puppetry that I engaged in and apologize for the disturbance it has caused. All I can say is that I had no idea of the serious nature of the act I committed or certainly I would not have done it. I voluntarily gave them my IP number so that they could verify it; they would not have been able to do so otherwise. I tried to cooperate. As far as not responding to accusations, if I do not I will have no chance of avoiding the Arbitration that is obviously being prepared for me over what I consider trivial reasons. Other than the sockpuppet, I have done nothing wrong. However, I cannot endure another Arbitration and will not edit if my block lasts two weeks, as there are those already calling for a 60 day block. I learned from the previous arbitration that not responding on the spot brings heartache. If you have another suggestion, I would appreciate it. But when people start listing diffs on your page for every opinion you have ever expressed, then it behooves me to answer now while I have nothing else to do. You think this is wrong? They are collecting \"evidence\" as we speak. For example, in the past I over looked Moni3's personal attacks. Now I have time to hunt them down. I have no way to record them except on this page, as I cannot edit anywhere else. What do you suggest I do? In two weeks, I will not have the energy to defend myslef. That is why I will not edit again when the two weeks are up. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you for your advice. I thought I had made an apology but I will do it again; I have certainly made it by email. I regret deeply the foolish act of sock-puppetry that I engaged in and apologize for the disturbance it has caused. All I can say is that I had no idea of the serious nature of the act I committed or certainly I would not have done it. I voluntarily gave them my IP number so that they could verify it; they would not have been able to do so otherwise. I tried to cooperate. As far as not responding to accusations, if I do not I will have no chance of avoiding the Arbitration that is obviously being prepared for me over what I consider trivial reasons. Other than the sockpuppet, I have done nothing wrong. However, I cannot endure another Arbitration and will not edit if my block lasts two weeks, as there are those already calling for a 60 day block. I learned from the previous arbitration that not responding on the spot brings heartache. If you have another suggestion, I would appreciate it. But when people start listing diffs on your page for every opinion you have ever expressed, then it behooves me to answer now while I have nothing else to do. You think this is wrong? They are collecting "evidence" as we speak. For example, in the past I over looked Moni3's personal attacks. Now I have time to hunt them down. I have no way to record them except on this page, as I cannot edit anywhere else. What do you suggest I do? In two weeks, I will not have the energy to defend myslef. That is why I will not edit again when the two weeks are up. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
270763 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270761 +++$+++ 270762 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.251535500E09 +++$+++ Given the hash that I make of my own real life, I'm really uneasy about giving life advice - but a general rule about life is that if you're in the wrong for something and people are throwing shit at you, you've just gotta eat it. You're in the wrong here and you should just eat it. (BTW, on re-reading the discussion, it seems to me that you didn't start the grievance\/accusation cycle so apologies for implying you did. Nevertheless, my general advice remains the same.) -- +++$+++ ::Given the hash that I make of my own real life, I'm really uneasy about giving life advice - but a general rule about life is that if you're in the wrong for something and people are throwing shit at you, you've just gotta eat it. You're in the wrong here and you should just eat it. (BTW, on re-reading the discussion, it seems to me that you didn't start the grievance/accusation cycle so apologies for implying you did. Nevertheless, my general advice remains the same.) --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 01:45, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
270764 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270761 +++$+++ 270763 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.251536400E09 +++$+++ I don't mind admitting I was in the wrong regarding the sockpuppet. But when long list of diffs are provides regarding remarks I made at FAR and accusations are made that I am the most incompetent GA review that editor has ever seen, that I am responsible for that editors problems, etc.  all with statements that I need a 60 day ban an  implications and statements that I should go back to Arbitration, then I feel I need to defend myself. If I don't do it now, I never will. Personal attacks that are not responded to end up in an Arbitration as fact I found from past experience. This is my last ditch effort at remaining on Wikipedia. If these attacks on me that have nothing to do with the sockpuppet incident are not refused, people tend to accept them as true. This I learned from my psst experience. Most often, the diffs prove nothing, but others tend not to check them out.  So you are suggesting that I just give up? You may be right as I am clearly being driven from Wikipedia by a small but determined group, the same ones  that worked so hard at getting me banned at my last arbitration. I can cease responding. But that will force my retirement. Maybe that is best.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::I don't mind admitting I was in the wrong regarding the sockpuppet. But when long list of diffs are provides regarding remarks I made at FAR and accusations are made that I am the most incompetent GA review that editor has ever seen, that I am responsible for that editors problems, etc.  all with statements that I need a 60 day ban an  implications and statements that I should go back to Arbitration, then I feel I need to defend myself. If I don't do it now, I never will. Personal attacks that are not responded to end up in an Arbitration as fact I found from past experience. This is my last ditch effort at remaining on Wikipedia. If these attacks on me that have nothing to do with the sockpuppet incident are not refused, people tend to accept them as true. This I learned from my psst experience. Most often, the diffs prove nothing, but others tend not to check them out.  So you are suggesting that I just give up? You may be right as I am clearly being driven from Wikipedia by a small but determined group, the same ones  that worked so hard at getting me banned at my last arbitration. I can cease responding. But that will force my retirement. Maybe that is best.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

253429 +++$+++ Brittle heaven +++$+++ Voorlandt +++$+++ 253429 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-08 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.207721580E09 +++$+++ Now the question is whether to split the Cadets up some more, or leave them together and give an explanation in the notes (not easy to reference though, because we're tying together various shreds of evidence rather than quoting from one fully correct source).  +++$+++ Now the question is whether to split the Cadets up some more, or leave them together and give an explanation in the notes (not easy to reference though, because we're tying together various shreds of evidence rather than quoting from one fully correct source). [[User:Brittle heaven|Brittle heaven]] ([[User talk:Brittle heaven|talk]]) 23:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
253430 +++$+++ Brittle heaven +++$+++ Voorlandt +++$+++ 253429 +++$+++ 253429 +++$+++ 2008-04-09 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.207809180E09 +++$+++ I tend to think that's probably a mistake. Maybe it was just in the mind of the editor that France historically organises under 17 tournaments. Dreev and Piket were both under 16 when that event took place. If there were other notable names given in an extended list of contestants, you may just want to check their ages at the time of the event, to be more reassured. It sounds like the contest was well and truly under the aegis of FIDE by then, so I can't see why the age limit would go back to the earlier French U-17 standard for one year. Speaking of mistakes, I checked ''Brace'' (pub. 1977) and found reference to a World Cadet Championship - and although he confirms the first 2 editions were U-18 and won by Mestel and Goodman, he then messes up by saying the event was inaugurated in 1975. ''Hooper and Whyld'' (pub. 1984) says simply that FIDE 'organises events for World Juniors (under 20) and World Cadets (Under 16)'. Unfortunately, there's no way of knowing whether this comment was typeset prior to the 1984 event you speak of. I think I would go along the lines you suggest - keep the cadets in one block, but add ''under-18'' from 1974-1976, then ''under-17'' to each edition after and including 1977. This could be annotated within one of the boxes in the block, or even as a footnote, like with Ftacnik\/Diesen in the Euro\/World Junior. Then all we need to do is start solving some of the other conflicts ... while wondering where FIDE\/Mr Leong get their facts from (probably an earlier version of Wikipedia!)   +++$+++ :I tend to think that's probably a mistake. Maybe it was just in the mind of the editor that France historically organises under 17 tournaments. Dreev and Piket were both under 16 when that event took place. If there were other notable names given in an extended list of contestants, you may just want to check their ages at the time of the event, to be more reassured. It sounds like the contest was well and truly under the aegis of FIDE by then, so I can't see why the age limit would go back to the earlier French U-17 standard for one year. Speaking of mistakes, I checked ''Brace'' (pub. 1977) and found reference to a World Cadet Championship - and although he confirms the first 2 editions were U-18 and won by Mestel and Goodman, he then messes up by saying the event was inaugurated in 1975. ''Hooper and Whyld'' (pub. 1984) says simply that FIDE 'organises events for World Juniors (under 20) and World Cadets (Under 16)'. Unfortunately, there's no way of knowing whether this comment was typeset prior to the 1984 event you speak of. I think I would go along the lines you suggest - keep the cadets in one block, but add ''under-18'' from 1974-1976, then ''under-17'' to each edition after and including 1977. This could be annotated within one of the boxes in the block, or even as a footnote, like with Ftacnik/Diesen in the Euro/World Junior. Then all we need to do is start solving some of the other conflicts ... while wondering where FIDE/Mr Leong get their facts from (probably an earlier version of Wikipedia!)  [[User:Brittle heaven|Brittle heaven]] ([[User talk:Brittle heaven|talk]]) 23:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

8621 +++$+++ wyatt915 +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-13 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.234585620E09 +++$+++ --<span style=\"border:2px solid grey;background-color:black\"><font color=\"green\" >[[User:wyatt915|Wyatt]]<\/font><font  color=\"blue\">[[User talk:wyatt915|915]]<\/font><font color=\"orange\" size=\"5\"> +++$+++ --<span style="border:2px solid grey;background-color:black"><font color="green" >[[User:wyatt915|Wyatt]]</font><font  color="blue">[[User talk:wyatt915|915]]</font><font color="orange" size="5">[[User:Wyatt915/Guestbook|✍]]</font></span> 20:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
8622 +++$+++ wyatt915 +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8621 +++$+++ 8621 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.234594800E09 +++$+++ Good.  I just had to check.  If you couldn't, then you really cant be an \xdcberScienceNerd.  But you passed!!!  Hooray! :\xfe --<span style=\"border:2px solid grey;background-color:black\"><font color=\"green\" >[[User:wyatt915|Wyatt]]<\/font><font  color=\"blue\">[[User talk:wyatt915|915]]<\/font><font color=\"orange\" size=\"5\"> +++$+++ :Good.  I just had to check.  If you couldn't, then you really cant be an ÜberScienceNerd.  But you passed!!!  Hooray! :þ --<span style="border:2px solid grey;background-color:black"><font color="green" >[[User:wyatt915|Wyatt]]</font><font  color="blue">[[User talk:wyatt915|915]]</font><font color="orange" size="5">[[User:Wyatt915/Guestbook|✍]]</font></span> 23:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

270767 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270767 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-29 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.251535620E09 +++$+++ Writing as a person, rather than an administrator or an arbitrator. I strongly urge that Mattisse step away from the computer and refrain from writing anything on this page for at least several days.  +++$+++ Writing as a person, rather than an administrator or an arbitrator. I strongly urge that Mattisse step away from the computer and refrain from writing anything on this page for at least several days. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 01:47, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
270768 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270767 +++$+++ 270767 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.251536400E09 +++$+++ Seconded, but on the condition that Mattisse does indeed return after a while. \u2013''' +++$+++ :Seconded, but on the condition that Mattisse does indeed return after a while. –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 02:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
270769 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270767 +++$+++ 270767 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.251537900E09 +++$+++ Good advice. -- +++$+++ :Good advice. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 02:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
270770 +++$+++ Ceranthor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270767 +++$+++ 270767 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.251575700E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, please return after a rest period. You are very helpful in general, not just in writing as everyone seems to be purporting. Best, ''' +++$+++ :Mattisse, please return after a rest period. You are very helpful in general, not just in writing as everyone seems to be purporting. Best, '''[[User:Ceranthor|<font color="#2F4F4F" face="Optima">ceran</font>]]'''[[User_talk:Ceranthor|<font color="#2F4F4F" face="Optima">''thor''</font>]] 12:55, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
270771 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270767 +++$+++ 270767 +++$+++ 2009-09-05 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.252182600E09 +++$+++ Mattisse? RETIRED?!?!? SOCKPUPPETRY????!!!???!!!??? Can you please come back when this boils over you're a great contributor and helped me with Loihi...we've lost too many great editors already... <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ :Mattisse? RETIRED?!?!? SOCKPUPPETRY????!!!???!!!??? Can you please come back when this boils over you're a great contributor and helped me with Loihi...we've lost too many great editors already... <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="black">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="black">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 13:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

532912 +++$+++ Terrycarroll +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-25 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.190771760E09 +++$+++ Please do not continue reverting unless you can point to a WP policy stating that these pieces should not be in the article. --  +++$+++ Please do not continue reverting unless you can point to a WP policy stating that these pieces should not be in the article. -- [[User:Terrycarroll|Terry Carroll]] 18:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
532913 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532912 +++$+++ 532912 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 08:11:00 +++$+++ 1.190992260E09 +++$+++ Ok, feel free to improve it. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, feel free to improve it. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

532914 +++$+++ Roadrunnerz45 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-28 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.191008400E09 +++$+++ Hi, I was wondering whether you would be kind enough to start a new page about the Womens version of the olympic qualifiers just like you did with the mens tournament. Only two teams have advanced so far being Japan and Chinese Taipei but over the next couple of weeks until October 7 all the teams will be set. You can bascially put the same info like you did and here is a website that gives you all the information [http:\/\/www.fiba2006brazil.com\/noticias.asp?l=en&n=194] Hope you can do it  +++$+++ Hi, I was wondering whether you would be kind enough to start a new page about the Womens version of the olympic qualifiers just like you did with the mens tournament. Only two teams have advanced so far being Japan and Chinese Taipei but over the next couple of weeks until October 7 all the teams will be set. You can bascially put the same info like you did and here is a website that gives you all the information [http://www.fiba2006brazil.com/noticias.asp?l=en&n=194] Hope you can do it [[User:Roadrunnerz45|Roadrunnerz45]] 12:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
532915 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532914 +++$+++ 532914 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.191012780E09 +++$+++ Sure, no problem. I presume it's better to make a separate article but what should be the name? FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament 2008\/Women? In fact, these namings are a bit biased but men sports are prevalent... Any suggestions? --''' +++$+++ : Sure, no problem. I presume it's better to make a separate article but what should be the name? FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament 2008/Women? In fact, these namings are a bit biased but men sports are prevalent... Any suggestions? --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
532916 +++$+++ Roadrunnerz45 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532914 +++$+++ 532915 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.191070440E09 +++$+++ Yeah you know what just say FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament 2008 for Women. I know its a handful, and i dont know whether it will fit but you cant call it the exact same name. I dont know what the official name is called but it will be something like this, just do your best and put something down. Thanks +++$+++ :: Yeah you know what just say FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament 2008 for Women. I know its a handful, and i dont know whether it will fit but you cant call it the exact same name. I dont know what the official name is called but it will be something like this, just do your best and put something down. Thanks[[User:Roadrunnerz45|Roadrunnerz45]] 05:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

613107 +++$+++ Govvy +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613107 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-14 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.208207220E09 +++$+++ Probably needs a more deceived ban, this IP is vandalising with \"Muhammad Jihad\".  +++$+++ Probably needs a more deceived ban, this IP is vandalising with "Muhammad Jihad". [[User:Govvy|Govvy]] ([[User talk:Govvy|talk]]) 14:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
613108 +++$+++ Govvy +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613107 +++$+++ 613107 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.208208240E09 +++$+++ btw, I put that block tag on the main user page, not if it's needed there know. Or what should be there.  +++$+++ :btw, I put that block tag on the main user page, not if it's needed there know. Or what should be there. [[User:Govvy|Govvy]] ([[User talk:Govvy|talk]]) 14:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
613109 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613107 +++$+++ 613108 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.208208840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up about this, the tag really belongs on the user talk page, where you've added it \u2013  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the heads-up about this, the tag really belongs on the user talk page, where you've added it – [[User talk:212.248.245.18]]. Note that a whois found the IP to be a school network or the like, so that's influenced the length of block. [[WP:VAND]] gives advice on all this, your assistance is much appreciated... 14:34, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

270772 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-08 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.252438980E09 +++$+++ I don't think she's coming back: she's posted retired all over the place...<span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ I don't think she's coming back: she's posted retired all over the place...<span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="black">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="black">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 12:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
270773 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270772 +++$+++ 270772 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.252453440E09 +++$+++ Mattisse's block does not expire until Friday.  Perhaps she will return after that.  +++$+++ :Mattisse's block does not expire until Friday.  Perhaps she will return after that. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 16:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
270774 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270772 +++$+++ 270773 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.252831020E09 +++$+++ I hope Mattise's recent edits indicate that she is indeed not retired.  +++$+++ ::I hope Mattise's recent edits indicate that she is indeed not retired. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 01:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

532918 +++$+++ Angie Y. +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-02 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.191355800E09 +++$+++ Why did you delete the [[American Karate]] article? It was fine until you deleted it. Now it'll have to be recreated all over again!  +++$+++ Why did you delete the [[American Karate]] article? It was fine until you deleted it. Now it'll have to be recreated all over again! [[User:Angie Y.|Angie Y.]] 13:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
532919 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532918 +++$+++ 532918 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.191384600E09 +++$+++ I guess the article you mean was moved to [[Red Dragon American Karate]]. So you can edit it from there. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : I guess the article you mean was moved to [[Red Dragon American Karate]]. So you can edit it from there. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
532920 +++$+++ Rp +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532918 +++$+++ 532919 +++$+++ 2007-12-14 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.197703860E09 +++$+++ Then set a redirection! *sigh*  +++$+++ ::Then set a redirection! *sigh* [[User:Rp|Rp]] ([[User talk:Rp|talk]]) 23:31, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
532921 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532918 +++$+++ 532920 +++$+++ 2007-12-15 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.197754320E09 +++$+++ I don't think this is a good idea. After all, there may be another thing with the same name... --''' +++$+++ ::: I don't think this is a good idea. After all, there may be another thing with the same name... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
532922 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532918 +++$+++ 532918 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.191690120E09 +++$+++ Hi. This page was tagged as proposed deletion, claiming that ''Fails notability. Appeared on a show, now has a streaming radioprogram. Googling on his real name gives four hits, surprisingly low.'' If you think you can address the concern, I can reinstate the article so you can work on it. Tell me. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. This page was tagged as proposed deletion, claiming that ''Fails notability. Appeared on a show, now has a streaming radioprogram. Googling on his real name gives four hits, surprisingly low.'' If you think you can address the concern, I can reinstate the article so you can work on it. Tell me. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
532923 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532918 +++$+++ 532918 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.191725640E09 +++$+++ Ok, reinstated. I agree that according to what you say the topic is notable. Just don't forget to add external references. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, reinstated. I agree that according to what you say the topic is notable. Just don't forget to add external references. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
532924 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532918 +++$+++ 532918 +++$+++ 2007-10-07 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.191806160E09 +++$+++ I didn't write that argumentation, I just deleted the article because it was tagged for deletion and noone objected. I know IMDB and not everyone there deserves an article on WP. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : I didn't write that argumentation, I just deleted the article because it was tagged for deletion and noone objected. I know IMDB and not everyone there deserves an article on WP. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

270775 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270775 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-28 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.254127980E09 +++$+++ I had already done the ArticleHistory update, manually. Perhaps you had not noticed this. ''' +++$+++ I had already done the ArticleHistory update, manually. Perhaps you had not noticed this. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 01:53, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
270776 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270775 +++$+++ 270775 +++$+++ 2009-09-29 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.254285060E09 +++$+++ No, I didn't notice. Thank you. I hope I didn't screw things up! (I just noticed your comment now.)  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :No, I didn't notice. Thank you. I hope I didn't screw things up! (I just noticed your comment now.)  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

8633 +++$+++ Simply south +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-16 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.287266160E09 +++$+++ Hello fellow motto contributor. Discussions arer still open on [[Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day\/Nominations#Suggested changes]] and still require further input especially on ideas 10-17. Please could you voice your opinion as this is going to be closed in early November. Please help out or even make any new idea suggestions.  +++$+++ Hello fellow motto contributor. Discussions arer still open on [[Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations#Suggested changes]] and still require further input especially on ideas 10-17. Please could you voice your opinion as this is going to be closed in early November. Please help out or even make any new idea suggestions. [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] ([[User talk:Simply south|talk]]) 14:56, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
8634 +++$+++ Simply south +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8633 +++$+++ 8633 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.288584780E09 +++$+++ This is a last call. Any opinions should be suggested by and including November 5th. See [[Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day\/Nominations\/Archive 2#Suggested Changes]]  +++$+++ :This is a last call. Any opinions should be suggested by and including November 5th. See [[Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations/Archive 2#Suggested Changes]] [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] ([[User talk:Simply south|talk]]) 21:13, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

8635 +++$+++ Simply south +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-24 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.290667800E09 +++$+++ The motto idea for those between 25th December and mid January needs consensus dtermined on what should be used for which day or even whether the whole idea should be scrapped or postponed. Please help by discussion and determining consensus at [[WT:Motto of the day\/Nominations#Christmas series]] and [[Wikipedia:Motto of the day\/Nominations\/Specials]].  +++$+++ The motto idea for those between 25th December and mid January needs consensus dtermined on what should be used for which day or even whether the whole idea should be scrapped or postponed. Please help by discussion and determining consensus at [[WT:Motto of the day/Nominations#Christmas series]] and [[Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/Specials]]. [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] ([[User talk:Simply south|talk]]) 22:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
8636 +++$+++  +++$+++ UberScienceNerd +++$+++ 8635 +++$+++ 8635 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.293003120E09 +++$+++ nEED TO KNOW BY fRIDAY.  +++$+++ :nEED TO KNOW BY fRIDAY. [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] ([[User talk:Simply south|talk]]) and their [[:Image:Xmas_tree_basic.jpg|tree]] 23:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

532925 +++$+++ Jack Merridew +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.191876840E09 +++$+++ Hi. I have started a [[List of Oh My Goddess characters]] page and tagged the character articles suggesting a merge. White Cat has just mass-reverted the whole thing. I strongly object and am having a bit of difficulty restraining the urge to revert right back. I would appreciate your opinion on this. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Hi. I have started a [[List of Oh My Goddess characters]] page and tagged the character articles suggesting a merge. White Cat has just mass-reverted the whole thing. I strongly object and am having a bit of difficulty restraining the urge to revert right back. I would appreciate your opinion on this. Thanks. --[[User:Jack Merridew|Jack Merridew]] 13:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
532926 +++$+++ White Cat +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532925 +++$+++ 532925 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.191877080E09 +++$+++ Tone you have told on the talk page \"So much for now, I'll come around again when some standpoints are made\" after that Jack Merridew has mass tagged the articles and I reverted him. He also mass redirectified the episode articles despite the lack of consensus [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=250&target=Jack+Merridew just a little while] ago. I need time to sort these articles out. I won't be able to work on them at all if I keep dealing with this aggressive tagging by Jack Merridew who has even tagged the articles on the main characters. --<small>  +++$+++ :Tone you have told on the talk page "So much for now, I'll come around again when some standpoints are made" after that Jack Merridew has mass tagged the articles and I reverted him. He also mass redirectified the episode articles despite the lack of consensus [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=250&target=Jack+Merridew just a little while] ago. I need time to sort these articles out. I won't be able to work on them at all if I keep dealing with this aggressive tagging by Jack Merridew who has even tagged the articles on the main characters. --<small> [[User:White Cat/07|Cat]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:White Cat/07|chi?]]</sup> 13:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
532927 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532925 +++$+++ 532926 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.191885960E09 +++$+++ Hm... as I said, maybe it's really better to get a full consensus on a topic with more people following... I have started a debate at the Tolkien project and there seems to be some progress there. I would prefer both of you to take a couple of days' break and we continue then. Nothing will be lost. --''' +++$+++ :: Hm... as I said, maybe it's really better to get a full consensus on a topic with more people following... I have started a debate at the Tolkien project and there seems to be some progress there. I would prefer both of you to take a couple of days' break and we continue then. Nothing will be lost. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
532928 +++$+++ Jack Merridew +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532925 +++$+++ 532927 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.191940380E09 +++$+++ I am not at all sure that conducting a discussion of this sort in the context of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga]] is appropriate as they state right up front that the project is about ''expansion'' of coverage. Certainly they can have their say, but I feel that outsiders have less fanish-bias. -- +++$+++ ::: I am not at all sure that conducting a discussion of this sort in the context of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga]] is appropriate as they state right up front that the project is about ''expansion'' of coverage. Certainly they can have their say, but I feel that outsiders have less fanish-bias. --[[User:Jack Merridew|Jack Merridew]] 07:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
532929 +++$+++ Jack Merridew +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532925 +++$+++ 532925 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.192052280E09 +++$+++ see: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Belldandy]] -- +++$+++ * see: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belldandy]] --[[User:Jack Merridew|Jack Merridew]] 14:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

8640 +++$+++ Diannaa +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.310704200E09 +++$+++ To facilitate answering the items listed at the FA, I have copied the lists into my [[User:Diannaa\/Sandbox|main sandbox]]. We are not allowed to tick off things or interweave our replies, so this is a good way to keep track of where we're at so far. Please go ahead and edit in the sandbox if you like. Regards, -- +++$+++ To facilitate answering the items listed at the FA, I have copied the lists into my [[User:Diannaa/Sandbox|main sandbox]]. We are not allowed to tick off things or interweave our replies, so this is a good way to keep track of where we're at so far. Please go ahead and edit in the sandbox if you like. Regards, --[[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 21:30, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
8641 +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8640 +++$+++ 8640 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.310730060E09 +++$+++ Excellent - thank you very much for the note! I see you've already done the majority of the proposed changes, and I'll assist in any way I can with the rest. Thanks again for your excellent help with this article!  +++$+++ :Excellent - thank you very much for the note! I see you've already done the majority of the proposed changes, and I'll assist in any way I can with the rest. Thanks again for your excellent help with this article! [[User:Doc9871|<font color="#000000" size="2">'''Doc'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Doc9871|<font color="#999999">'''talk'''</font>]] 04:41, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

8642 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.311180000E09 +++$+++ Yeah, we really need to have a centralised discussion about this. The two things we need to work out are, firstly, under which license these images are ''actually'' released, preferably replacing the \"I reckon it's CC\" template with one that says \"This is from blah. Therefore, it is released in such a way.\" Secondly, however, we need to work out how the archive got these images, and so what right they have to release them. If they were all taken by employees of the State of Florida, that's fine (but that may actually make them PD anyway) but, if not, we'll need details.  +++$+++ Yeah, we really need to have a centralised discussion about this. The two things we need to work out are, firstly, under which license these images are ''actually'' released, preferably replacing the "I reckon it's CC" template with one that says "This is from blah. Therefore, it is released in such a way." Secondly, however, we need to work out how the archive got these images, and so what right they have to release them. If they were all taken by employees of the State of Florida, that's fine (but that may actually make them PD anyway) but, if not, we'll need details. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 09:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
8643 +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8642 +++$+++ 8642 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 10:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311181560E09 +++$+++ I know for a fact that not all of these images were necessarily taken by employees of the State of Florida. But it's \"all or nothing\": the entire archive must be shown to be unacceptable if even one image from it is. I'll start sending some e-mails. Cheers :>  +++$+++ :I know for a fact that not all of these images were necessarily taken by employees of the State of Florida. But it's "all or nothing": the entire archive must be shown to be unacceptable if even one image from it is. I'll start sending some e-mails. Cheers :> [[User:Doc9871|<font color="#000000" size="2">'''Doc'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Doc9871|<font color="#999999">'''talk'''</font>]] 10:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
8644 +++$+++ Crohnie +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8642 +++$+++ 8643 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311182460E09 +++$+++ Ok this is from memory but some of the images were put there by [[User:Vidor|Vidor]].  Some I believe were snagged off of Flickr (sp?) (rage photo I believe), and some from the state (mugshots).  Also the images of the VW he used to own is from a museum that got started, don't remember the name of it but it's about serial killers and so forth. I'll help too if there is something you all need me to do.  I've been around a bit here but just being a lurker to help with another article.  They needed editors to kind of watch what was going on and to step in when things got a little too hot, that was what I was trying to help with. ;)  So please let me know what I can do to help.  Diannaa, I hope it's ok for me to use your sandbox too but I will ask you directly to be sure.  It looks good everyone.  I knew the images were going to be questioned again.  You should also be able to find discussions about them and why they are acceptable for use too since there was an editor long ago that kept trying to get the images in a lot of article removed.  Thanks, -- +++$+++ ::Ok this is from memory but some of the images were put there by [[User:Vidor|Vidor]].  Some I believe were snagged off of Flickr (sp?) (rage photo I believe), and some from the state (mugshots).  Also the images of the VW he used to own is from a museum that got started, don't remember the name of it but it's about serial killers and so forth. I'll help too if there is something you all need me to do.  I've been around a bit here but just being a lurker to help with another article.  They needed editors to kind of watch what was going on and to step in when things got a little too hot, that was what I was trying to help with. ;)  So please let me know what I can do to help.  Diannaa, I hope it's ok for me to use your sandbox too but I will ask you directly to be sure.  It looks good everyone.  I knew the images were going to be questioned again.  You should also be able to find discussions about them and why they are acceptable for use too since there was an editor long ago that kept trying to get the images in a lot of article removed.  Thanks, --[[User:Crohnie|<span style="color:Indigo">'''Crohnie'''</span><span style="color:deeppink">'''Gal'''</span>]][[User talk:Crohnie|<span style="color:deepskyblue"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 10:21, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
8645 +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8642 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311243840E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I pretty much hate Corbis: using Bill Gates' limitless fortune to buy up every image on the planet so that they can lease the usage rights for even more money to put into his coffers. That's capitalism for you though, and it's the way it works. FWIW: the \"rage\" picture in Foreman 1992 (p.6) is credited to \"AP\/Wide World Photos, New York\", so clearly Corbis  bought up a lot of photos from them. Which of the \"several\" photos are going to be a problem now?  +++$+++ ::::Yeah, I pretty much hate Corbis: using Bill Gates' limitless fortune to buy up every image on the planet so that they can lease the usage rights for even more money to put into his coffers. That's capitalism for you though, and it's the way it works. FWIW: the "rage" picture in Foreman 1992 (p.6) is credited to "AP/Wide World Photos, New York", so clearly Corbis  bought up a lot of photos from them. Which of the "several" photos are going to be a problem now? [[User:Doc9871|<font color="#000000" size="2">'''Doc'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Doc9871|<font color="#999999">'''talk'''</font>]] 03:24, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
8646 +++$+++ Diannaa +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8642 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311246000E09 +++$+++ The problematic images are listed at [[:commons:Commons:Deletion requests\/Images from the Florida Photographic Collection]]. The ones that apply to the Ted Bundy article have already been removed from the article. About what was expected. The one we formerly had in teh info box and the one where he's leaning against the wall are Bettman\/Corbis for sure. All the victim photos are gone. I would like to provide the readers with a link to a good website about the victims; if anyone knows of one? How about [https:\/\/sites.google.com\/site\/tributetothevictimsoftedbundy\/  this one]? -- +++$+++ :::::The problematic images are listed at [[:commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Images from the Florida Photographic Collection]]. The ones that apply to the Ted Bundy article have already been removed from the article. About what was expected. The one we formerly had in teh info box and the one where he's leaning against the wall are Bettman/Corbis for sure. All the victim photos are gone. I would like to provide the readers with a link to a good website about the victims; if anyone knows of one? How about [https://sites.google.com/site/tributetothevictimsoftedbundy/  this one]? --[[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 04:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
8647 +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8642 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311247140E09 +++$+++ They have *not* been removed from the article and they should not be until the situation at the Commons is resolved. I've already established that two different agencies \"claim\" copyright to the same image and charge for its use: they are not owned by the same company to my knowledge. I've also established that Florida mug shots are subject to being credited to one of the same agencies that lays claim to the infobox image, so the Florida PD thing wiki-wide isn't even so crystal clear. No one is going to die if we wait to see what happens at the Commons (and hopefully before then what the Florida Memory Project says about each specific image). We're going to slap a PD license on [[:File:Ted Bundy mug shot.jpg]] and take it from the same place that we're trying to get rid of all the other images without knowing the full story? As you said: no deadline.  +++$+++ ::::::They have *not* been removed from the article and they should not be until the situation at the Commons is resolved. I've already established that two different agencies "claim" copyright to the same image and charge for its use: they are not owned by the same company to my knowledge. I've also established that Florida mug shots are subject to being credited to one of the same agencies that lays claim to the infobox image, so the Florida PD thing wiki-wide isn't even so crystal clear. No one is going to die if we wait to see what happens at the Commons (and hopefully before then what the Florida Memory Project says about each specific image). We're going to slap a PD license on [[:File:Ted Bundy mug shot.jpg]] and take it from the same place that we're trying to get rid of all the other images without knowing the full story? As you said: no deadline. [[User:Doc9871|<font color="#000000" size="2">'''Doc'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Doc9871|<font color="#999999">'''talk'''</font>]] 04:19, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

270788 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-30 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.254361440E09 +++$+++ Do you think we need to tell the reader how many months the Battle of Stalingrad was, in the lede yet?  Or can you come up with a better way of putting it?-- +++$+++ Do you think we need to tell the reader how many months the Battle of Stalingrad was, in the lede yet?  Or can you come up with a better way of putting it?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 18:44, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
270789 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270788 +++$+++ 270788 +++$+++ 2009-09-30 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.254362220E09 +++$+++ Too hard to come up with months accurately, and is there a reason to? I like the \"bloody\" but I wonder why you do not name the war. \u2014 +++$+++ : Too hard to come up with months accurately, and is there a reason to? I like the "bloody" but I wonder why you do not name the war. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:57, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
270790 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270788 +++$+++ 270789 +++$+++ 2009-09-30 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.254364080E09 +++$+++ No reason to.  Someone put in a comment, \"how many months?\"  Thought it was you.  Name the war?  Since this article is supposed to be a little Russo centric, I called it the Great Patriotic War whereever I could.-- +++$+++ ::No reason to.  Someone put in a comment, "how many months?"  Thought it was you.  Name the war?  Since this article is supposed to be a little Russo centric, I called it the Great Patriotic War whereever I could.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 19:28, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
270791 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270788 +++$+++ 270790 +++$+++ 2009-09-30 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.254364320E09 +++$+++ Is it OK now?  \u2014 +++$+++ :::Is it OK now?  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:32, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
270792 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270788 +++$+++ 270791 +++$+++ 2009-09-30 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.254364860E09 +++$+++ I'm fine with it.  It is what it is.  Horrifying casualty count.-- +++$+++ ::::I'm fine with it.  It is what it is.  Horrifying casualty count.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 19:41, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

394657 +++$+++ Crazymonkey1123 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-03 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.307087820E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&diff=prev&oldid=432270511  I hope your enjoying yourself now]. [[User:Crazymonkey1123|Crazymonkey1123]] (Jacob) <sup>[[User talk:Crazymonkey1123|T]] or [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Crazymonkey1123&action=edit&section=new M]<\/sup>\/<sub>[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Crazymonkey1123\/guestbook&action=edit Sign]  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&diff=prev&oldid=432270511  I hope your enjoying yourself now]. [[User:Crazymonkey1123|Crazymonkey1123]] (Jacob) <sup>[[User talk:Crazymonkey1123|T]] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Crazymonkey1123&action=edit&section=new M]</sup>/<sub>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Crazymonkey1123/guestbook&action=edit Sign] [[User:Crazymonkey1123/guestbook|mine]]</sub> 00:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
394658 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394657 +++$+++ 394657 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.307088840E09 +++$+++ Don't be so childish, my comments were in no way intended to be personal, I was simply pointing out that protection is unnecessary. And by the way, you might want to take a look at [[WP:SMI]] and [[Wikipedia talk:User pages\/UI spoofing]]-- +++$+++ :Don't be so childish, my comments were in no way intended to be personal, I was simply pointing out that protection is unnecessary. And by the way, you might want to take a look at [[WP:SMI]] and [[Wikipedia talk:User pages/UI spoofing]]--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 01:14, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
394659 +++$+++ Crazymonkey1123 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394657 +++$+++ 394658 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.307158320E09 +++$+++ I have already been bugged about that twice. [[User:Crazymonkey1123|Crazymonkey1123]] (Jacob) <sup>[[User talk:Crazymonkey1123|T]] or [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Crazymonkey1123&action=edit&section=new M]<\/sup>\/<sub>[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Crazymonkey1123\/guestbook&action=edit Sign]  +++$+++ ::I have already been bugged about that twice. [[User:Crazymonkey1123|Crazymonkey1123]] (Jacob) <sup>[[User talk:Crazymonkey1123|T]] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Crazymonkey1123&action=edit&section=new M]</sup>/<sub>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Crazymonkey1123/guestbook&action=edit Sign] [[User:Crazymonkey1123/guestbook|mine]]</sub> 20:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
394660 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394657 +++$+++ 394659 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.307160480E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you should listen then-- +++$+++ :::Perhaps you should listen then--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 21:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

8648 +++$+++ Crohnie +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8648 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311382800E09 +++$+++ {{od}}Ok doing a search for 'Free images of Ted Bundy' comes up with [http:\/\/www.bing.com\/images\/search?q=Free+photos+Ted+Bundy&qpvt=Free+photos+Ted+Bundy&FORM=IGRE this].  There are a lot of images here but I'm not sure what we can do with them but it says they are free.  Thoughts? -- +++$+++ {{od}}Ok doing a search for 'Free images of Ted Bundy' comes up with [http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Free+photos+Ted+Bundy&qpvt=Free+photos+Ted+Bundy&FORM=IGRE this].  There are a lot of images here but I'm not sure what we can do with them but it says they are free.  Thoughts? --[[User:Crohnie|<span style="color:Indigo">'''Crohnie'''</span><span style="color:deeppink">'''Gal'''</span>]][[User talk:Crohnie|<span style="color:deepskyblue"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 18:00, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
8649 +++$+++ Crohnie +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8648 +++$+++ 8648 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311383400E09 +++$+++ I just looked at the dif above and there shouldn't be any problems with the images.  These have all been discussed.  The one of the victim needed removal I think because I believe it was a yearbook image though even with those copyright does run out, doesn't it?  Most of these images are old, real old so I would think they would become public domain with time, am I wrong? The dif I provide is free images and we have quite a few of them that are on this dif.  -- +++$+++ :I just looked at the dif above and there shouldn't be any problems with the images.  These have all been discussed.  The one of the victim needed removal I think because I believe it was a yearbook image though even with those copyright does run out, doesn't it?  Most of these images are old, real old so I would think they would become public domain with time, am I wrong? The dif I provide is free images and we have quite a few of them that are on this dif.  --[[User:Crohnie|<span style="color:Indigo">'''Crohnie'''</span><span style="color:deeppink">'''Gal'''</span>]][[User talk:Crohnie|<span style="color:deepskyblue"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 18:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

176204 +++$+++ Jezhotwells +++$+++ P. S. Burton +++$+++ 176204 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311641160E09 +++$+++ Hi, would you care to specify what you believe to be non-free material in the article? I recently passed this for GA and found no copy-vios.  +++$+++ Hi, would you care to specify what you believe to be non-free material in the article? I recently passed this for GA and found no copy-vios. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 17:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
176205 +++$+++ P. S. Burton +++$+++ P. S. Burton +++$+++ 176204 +++$+++ 176204 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311653940E09 +++$+++ Hi. The problem is not the text (which is very good and indeed of GA quality) but the excessive use of non-free sounds and images. Have a look a e.g. [[The Beatles]] for guidance. Right now their is too much non-free media for one article. <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps\"><span style=\"font-family:Baskerville\"> +++$+++ :Hi. The problem is not the text (which is very good and indeed of GA quality) but the excessive use of non-free sounds and images. Have a look a e.g. [[The Beatles]] for guidance. Right now their is too much non-free media for one article. <span style="font-variant: small-caps"><span style="font-family:Baskerville">[[User:P. S. Burton|P. S. Burton]]  ([[User talk:P. S. Burton|talk]])</span></span> 21:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
176206 +++$+++ Jezhotwells +++$+++ P. S. Burton +++$+++ 176204 +++$+++ 176205 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.311657360E09 +++$+++ Yes, I mentioned that as far as FAC would be concerned, but there is no GA criteria on this. I think a copy-vio tag may not be quite the thing.  +++$+++ ::Yes, I mentioned that as far as FAC would be concerned, but there is no GA criteria on this. I think a copy-vio tag may not be quite the thing. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 22:16, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
176207 +++$+++ P. S. Burton +++$+++ P. S. Burton +++$+++ 176204 +++$+++ 176206 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.311657780E09 +++$+++ I don't mean to be disruptive, and by no means do I want to destroy such a nice article. However, regardless of FAC and GA, excessive use of non-free material is generally discouraged. Please see [[WP:FAIRUSE]]. Cheers. <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps\"><span style=\"font-family:Baskerville\"> +++$+++ :::I don't mean to be disruptive, and by no means do I want to destroy such a nice article. However, regardless of FAC and GA, excessive use of non-free material is generally discouraged. Please see [[WP:FAIRUSE]]. Cheers. <span style="font-variant: small-caps"><span style="font-family:Baskerville">[[User:P. S. Burton|P. S. Burton]]  ([[User talk:P. S. Burton|talk]])</span></span> 22:23, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
176208 +++$+++ Kohoutek1138 +++$+++ P. S. Burton +++$+++ 176204 +++$+++ 176207 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311699720E09 +++$+++ In addition to my above points, I have to agree with Jezhotwells that slapping a copy-vio tag on the article may not be quite the proper thing to do, given that there are no actual copy-vios per se and it recently passed that part of a GA review. As an aside, I have transcluded this conversation to [[Talk: The Byrds]] and would suggest that we continue it there in case other interested editors want to pitch in with their opinions. -- +++$+++ ::::In addition to my above points, I have to agree with Jezhotwells that slapping a copy-vio tag on the article may not be quite the proper thing to do, given that there are no actual copy-vios per se and it recently passed that part of a GA review. As an aside, I have transcluded this conversation to [[Talk: The Byrds]] and would suggest that we continue it there in case other interested editors want to pitch in with their opinions. --[[User:Kohoutek1138|Kohoutek1138]] ([[User talk:Kohoutek1138|talk]]) 10:02, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

270794 +++$+++ Tanweer Morshed +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-02 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.254527820E09 +++$+++ Dear Mattisse, I found that you are an experienced and efficient user in Wikipedia. Could you please help me by reviewing my nominated article [[Dhaka Residential Model College]] ?. I have nominated the article for [[WP:GA]] status. If you think that the article is eligible enough for the [[WP:Good article]] status then please give it PASS. Thanks,  +++$+++ Dear Mattisse, I found that you are an experienced and efficient user in Wikipedia. Could you please help me by reviewing my nominated article [[Dhaka Residential Model College]] ?. I have nominated the article for [[WP:GA]] status. If you think that the article is eligible enough for the [[WP:Good article]] status then please give it PASS. Thanks, [[User:Tanweer Morshed|Tanweer Morshed]] ([[User talk:Tanweer Morshed|talk]]) 16:57, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
270795 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270794 +++$+++ 270794 +++$+++ 2009-10-02 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.254545040E09 +++$+++ I am sorry but I am not doing GA reviews at the present time. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :I am sorry but I am not doing GA reviews at the present time. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:44, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

8652 +++$+++ Koavf +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.312551300E09 +++$+++ '''Excessive?''' I'm \"editing\" his page only to the extent that I am using [[WP:TWINKLE]] to nominate articles for deletion that he created ''and'' his user talk redirects to his user page (as a product of having been banned.) Note that I am removing the notices most every time (some admins have beaten me to the punch a few times... \u2014 +++$+++ '''Excessive?''' I'm "editing" his page only to the extent that I am using [[WP:TWINKLE]] to nominate articles for deletion that he created ''and'' his user talk redirects to his user page (as a product of having been banned.) Note that I am removing the notices most every time (some admins have beaten me to the punch a few times... —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 06:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
8653 +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8652 +++$+++ 8652 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.312551840E09 +++$+++ It's best not to stir the pot: just some advice. As a banned user he really doesn't need to be notified of things like this.  +++$+++ :It's best not to stir the pot: just some advice. As a banned user he really doesn't need to be notified of things like this. [[User:Doc9871|<font color="#000000" size="2">'''Doc'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Doc9871|<font color="#999999">'''talk'''</font>]] 06:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
8654 +++$+++ Koavf +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8652 +++$+++ 8653 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312551960E09 +++$+++ '''Oh, I know''' He's already sent me several harassing and offensive e-mails. \u2014 +++$+++ ::'''Oh, I know''' He's already sent me several harassing and offensive e-mails. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 06:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
8655 +++$+++ Diannaa +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8652 +++$+++ 8654 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.312598100E09 +++$+++ Courcelles has now full-protected the page. -- +++$+++ :::Courcelles has now full-protected the page. --[[User:Diannaa|Dianna]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 19:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

270797 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-04 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.254717540E09 +++$+++ [[User:Alefbe|Alefbe]] doesn't like me because I blocked him for edit warring several weeks ago and, even though other administrators upheld the block, apparently I am the evil admin who's out to get him. (See discussion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Alefbe&oldid=315425236#page_moves here].) So that's why he's going out of his way to make a big deal out of my edits here. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ [[User:Alefbe|Alefbe]] doesn't like me because I blocked him for edit warring several weeks ago and, even though other administrators upheld the block, apparently I am the evil admin who's out to get him. (See discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alefbe&oldid=315425236#page_moves here].) So that's why he's going out of his way to make a big deal out of my edits here. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 21:39, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
270798 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270797 +++$+++ 270797 +++$+++ 2009-10-04 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.254717960E09 +++$+++ Also: given that I posted a rationale for this naming [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Turpan&diff=317911008&oldid=317910492 over 30 minutes ago] and Alefbe has made no effort to respond to it, but has just reiterated over and over again that he thinks it was mean of me to move it, I will assume that 1) he has nothing constructive left to say and thus agrees with my arguments; and 2) he is more interested in trying to get me in 'trouble' than in the article itself. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ :Also: given that I posted a rationale for this naming [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Turpan&diff=317911008&oldid=317910492 over 30 minutes ago] and Alefbe has made no effort to respond to it, but has just reiterated over and over again that he thinks it was mean of me to move it, I will assume that 1) he has nothing constructive left to say and thus agrees with my arguments; and 2) he is more interested in trying to get me in 'trouble' than in the article itself. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 21:46, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
270799 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270797 +++$+++ 270798 +++$+++ 2009-10-04 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.254718920E09 +++$+++ OK. I was just asking. I have written articles referring to the place, but I honestly cannot remember the spelling I used. I would have to look in the reference books I used, which I don't feel like doing at the moment. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::OK. I was just asking. I have written articles referring to the place, but I honestly cannot remember the spelling I used. I would have to look in the reference books I used, which I don't feel like doing at the moment. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
270800 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270797 +++$+++ 270799 +++$+++ 2009-10-04 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.254720420E09 +++$+++ For example, I was the original author of [[Emin Minaret]]. My sources spelled it \"Turfan\" Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::For example, I was the original author of [[Emin Minaret]]. My sources spelled it "Turfan" Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
270801 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270797 +++$+++ 270800 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.254728460E09 +++$+++ For a bit of background...the \/f\/ sound is rare in Uyghur (mostly just present in borrowed words, like Kalifuniya--California) and Uyghur speakers often mix it up with \/p\/...for instance, many say \"propessor\" instead of \"professor\". I don't know the etymology of \"Turpan\", but the word \"Turfan\" probably comes from English re-translation of the Chinese name (the Chinese language takes  great liberties in adapting foreign words to its strict sound system, so the Uyghur name \"Turpan\" was changed to \"Tulufan\" when it was brought into Chinese... since Western writers and missionaries had greater contact with Chinese than Uyghurs, it is likely that they [[Back-translation|back-translated]] Tulufan into Turfan). <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ ::::For a bit of background...the /f/ sound is rare in Uyghur (mostly just present in borrowed words, like Kalifuniya--California) and Uyghur speakers often mix it up with /p/...for instance, many say "propessor" instead of "professor". I don't know the etymology of "Turpan", but the word "Turfan" probably comes from English re-translation of the Chinese name (the Chinese language takes  great liberties in adapting foreign words to its strict sound system, so the Uyghur name "Turpan" was changed to "Tulufan" when it was brought into Chinese... since Western writers and missionaries had greater contact with Chinese than Uyghurs, it is likely that they [[Back-translation|back-translated]] Tulufan into Turfan). <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 00:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

8656 +++$+++ Koavf +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312551900E09 +++$+++ '''Friendly heads-up''' Your file mover and dab pages with links top icons are on top of one another (at least, on Firefox 5 running on Windows Vista.) \u2014 +++$+++ '''Friendly heads-up''' Your file mover and dab pages with links top icons are on top of one another (at least, on Firefox 5 running on Windows Vista.) —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 06:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
8657 +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ Doc9871 +++$+++ 8656 +++$+++ 8656 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312552020E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Don't know how to fix it, but if you can I'd appreciate it! :>  +++$+++ :Thanks! Don't know how to fix it, but if you can I'd appreciate it! :> [[User:Doc9871|<font color="#000000" size="2">'''Doc'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Doc9871|<font color="#999999">'''talk'''</font>]] 06:47, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

532945 +++$+++ 72.1.134.252 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532945 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-31 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.193820480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:72.1.134.252|72.1.134.252]] 01:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
532946 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532945 +++$+++ 532945 +++$+++ 2007-10-28 08:48:00 +++$+++ 1.193586480E09 +++$+++ Hi. If you have an approval from the original author, I see no probelms in restoring the article. However, some cleanup needs to be cone in order to fit WP standards and I will rename it to International Conference of Symphony and Opera Musicians (without acronym). Next time you simply write on the talkpage that the author allows to post the content and noone will complain. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. If you have an approval from the original author, I see no probelms in restoring the article. However, some cleanup needs to be cone in order to fit WP standards and I will rename it to International Conference of Symphony and Opera Musicians (without acronym). Next time you simply write on the talkpage that the author allows to post the content and noone will complain. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

270802 +++$+++ Shii +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270802 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-12 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.250121840E09 +++$+++ I saw you were reviewing my article, which made me very glad. :) But then a review never appeared, and it made me very sad. :( I sat around for a few hours editing random pages and waiting for a review to appear. But it never did. Woe is me!  +++$+++ I saw you were reviewing my article, which made me very glad. :) But then a review never appeared, and it made me very sad. :( I sat around for a few hours editing random pages and waiting for a review to appear. But it never did. Woe is me! [[User:Shii|Shii]] [[user_talk:Shii|(tock)]] 17:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
270803 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270802 +++$+++ 270802 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.250122380E09 +++$+++ Which article is yours?  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Which article is yours?  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:13, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
270804 +++$+++ Shii +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270802 +++$+++ 270803 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.251092040E09 +++$+++ Paging you to [[Talk:Living River Siam]], just a few things left  +++$+++ ::Paging you to [[Talk:Living River Siam]], just a few things left [[User:Shii|Shii]] [[user_talk:Shii|(tock)]] 22:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
270805 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270802 +++$+++ 270804 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.251094380E09 +++$+++ OK. Ping me when you are done. &mdash; +++$+++ :::OK. Ping me when you are done. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
270806 +++$+++ Shii +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270802 +++$+++ 270805 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.251094680E09 +++$+++ If you don't have any objection to my responses (2) and (1) then I'm pretty much done. Thanks for your help!  +++$+++ ::::If you don't have any objection to my responses (2) and (1) then I'm pretty much done. Thanks for your help! [[User:Shii|Shii]] [[user_talk:Shii|(tock)]] 23:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

8659 +++$+++ 71.194.32.252 +++$+++ Stephen Day +++$+++ 8659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-10 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.241952780E09 +++$+++ Hi Stephen. ''Marvel Zombies 1'' and ''Marvel Zombies 2'' took place entirely in an alternate universe. ''Marvel Zombies 3'' took place partly in both the same universe, and partly in the \"mainstream\" Marvel Universe, as the virus entered into \"Earth-616\" and the heroes try to keep it contained. ''Marvel Zombies 4'' has so far taken place entirely in the mainstream Marvel Universe. [[Special:Contributions\/71.194.32.252|71.194.32.252]] ( +++$+++ Hi Stephen. ''Marvel Zombies 1'' and ''Marvel Zombies 2'' took place entirely in an alternate universe. ''Marvel Zombies 3'' took place partly in both the same universe, and partly in the "mainstream" Marvel Universe, as the virus entered into "Earth-616" and the heroes try to keep it contained. ''Marvel Zombies 4'' has so far taken place entirely in the mainstream Marvel Universe. [[Special:Contributions/71.194.32.252|71.194.32.252]] ([[User talk:71.194.32.252|talk]]) 03:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
8660 +++$+++ 71.194.32.252 +++$+++ Stephen Day +++$+++ 8659 +++$+++ 8659 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.241994660E09 +++$+++ Cool, no worries. :) [[Special:Contributions\/71.194.32.252|71.194.32.252]] ( +++$+++ :Cool, no worries. :) [[Special:Contributions/71.194.32.252|71.194.32.252]] ([[User talk:71.194.32.252|talk]]) 15:31, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

569422 +++$+++ Lethaniol +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-17 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.166384760E09 +++$+++ I see you are part of the adoption process, and have adopted a fair few new users (I am not spying, I just check the new users wanting adoption every few hours to check that people are getting adopted and see that you contact a fair few), but I see you are not using the [[Template:Adopting]] or [[Template|Adopted]], and so your name does not appear on the Categories of Wikipedians involved in Adopt-a-User. I wondered if there was a particular reason for that? Cheers  +++$+++ I see you are part of the adoption process, and have adopted a fair few new users (I am not spying, I just check the new users wanting adoption every few hours to check that people are getting adopted and see that you contact a fair few), but I see you are not using the [[Template:Adopting]] or [[Template|Adopted]], and so your name does not appear on the Categories of Wikipedians involved in Adopt-a-User. I wondered if there was a particular reason for that? Cheers [[User:Lethaniol|Lethaniol]] 11:46, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
569423 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569422 +++$+++ 569422 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.166392560E09 +++$+++ My mistake entirely!  I have been so busy with the adoptees and answering their queries along with my own regular duties that I forgot to add the adopted template to my own pages!  I will correct that now.  Thanks for reminding me,  +++$+++ :My mistake entirely!  I have been so busy with the adoptees and answering their queries along with my own regular duties that I forgot to add the adopted template to my own pages!  I will correct that now.  Thanks for reminding me, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 13:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

270807 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-13 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.250152440E09 +++$+++ ..is a fightin' word. Has that [[ad hominem]] kinda odor...  +++$+++ ..is a fightin' word. Has that [[ad hominem]] kinda odor... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 01:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270808 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270807 +++$+++ 270807 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.250152620E09 +++$+++ I think someone is stalking me. That was one, sole,  edit to an article that was not at FAR. So what was the point of the comment?  The discussion is about articles at FAR. So what did that one edit prove? You tell me. &mdash; +++$+++ :I think someone is stalking me. That was one, sole,  edit to an article that was not at FAR. So what was the point of the comment?  The discussion is about articles at FAR. So what did that one edit prove? You tell me. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270809 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270807 +++$+++ 270808 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.250154060E09 +++$+++ I dunno if it means anything or not. And this may sound shocking, but I doubt it matters. First of all, a long time ago I myself used to comb through peoples' contribs looking for evidence when I disagreed with them. I don't do it now, but only because I've become very very lazy, or perhaps thge laziness is actually residue from my period of burnout. Either way, I don't do it now, but I think it's common and even normal (though perhaps a bit confrontational, in some contexts). Secondly, if I could summarize absolutely everything that I have ever said to you about on-wiki interactions, it would be this: \"Learn not to give a crap.\" Let it go. Water of a duck's back. It washes off. And soon. I learned this lesson out of context... many years ago  a mother of several children told me she'd been (very literally) pooped and peed on more than a few times. I said \"Wow, that's disgusting\". She said, \"You know, one thing I've learned after years of being a mother &mdash; poop just washes off.\" :-)  +++$+++ ::I dunno if it means anything or not. And this may sound shocking, but I doubt it matters. First of all, a long time ago I myself used to comb through peoples' contribs looking for evidence when I disagreed with them. I don't do it now, but only because I've become very very lazy, or perhaps thge laziness is actually residue from my period of burnout. Either way, I don't do it now, but I think it's common and even normal (though perhaps a bit confrontational, in some contexts). Secondly, if I could summarize absolutely everything that I have ever said to you about on-wiki interactions, it would be this: "Learn not to give a crap." Let it go. Water of a duck's back. It washes off. And soon. I learned this lesson out of context... many years ago  a mother of several children told me she'd been (very literally) pooped and peed on more than a few times. I said "Wow, that's disgusting". She said, "You know, one thing I've learned after years of being a mother &mdash; poop just washes off." :-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 02:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270810 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270807 +++$+++ 270809 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.250155260E09 +++$+++ Well, I can't image stalking someone. And I am surprised you did it.  Recently someone told me to post on an article talk page, but when I refused to do it, retribution followed, nonetheless,  when that person insisted on posting on my behalf.  Retribution not  only on my talk page, but under my posts on the talk pages of others not even involved!  Some editors clearly have nothing else to do but follow me around!  This place is really an interpersonal circus; the encyclopedia is just an excuse for everyone to ego bash and post sweet nothings on favorite other's pages. You are one of the few editors I respect, and whose view I value, despite what I am saying here.   Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Well, I can't image stalking someone. And I am surprised you did it.  Recently someone told me to post on an article talk page, but when I refused to do it, retribution followed, nonetheless,  when that person insisted on posting on my behalf.  Retribution not  only on my talk page, but under my posts on the talk pages of others not even involved!  Some editors clearly have nothing else to do but follow me around!  This place is really an interpersonal circus; the encyclopedia is just an excuse for everyone to ego bash and post sweet nothings on favorite other's pages. You are one of the few editors I respect, and whose view I value, despite what I am saying here.   Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270811 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270807 +++$+++ 270810 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.250156220E09 +++$+++ Ha! If you respect me, then you are one of the few who do! I'm sorta two-dimensional&mdash;sometimes I channel [[User:Geometry guy]], but  more often than not I represent a faint, faded echo of the legend that is [[User:Malleus Fatuorum]]. ;-) But back to the point... ummm... I'm not sure my limited attention span enables me to follow that whole retribution anecdote, but.... uh... I dunno. If someone came at my door calling me an idiot, I'd mention [[WP:DENY]] then very studiously ignore him or her. And continue to do so, no matter what.... I get very very involved and excited in debates sometimes, but I am almost always involved in the topic rather than the person. With extremely few exceptions. I'm not perfect. yet. But anyhow. [[WP:DENY]].  +++$+++ ::::Ha! If you respect me, then you are one of the few who do! I'm sorta two-dimensional&mdash;sometimes I channel [[User:Geometry guy]], but  more often than not I represent a faint, faded echo of the legend that is [[User:Malleus Fatuorum]]. ;-) But back to the point... ummm... I'm not sure my limited attention span enables me to follow that whole retribution anecdote, but.... uh... I dunno. If someone came at my door calling me an idiot, I'd mention [[WP:DENY]] then very studiously ignore him or her. And continue to do so, no matter what.... I get very very involved and excited in debates sometimes, but I am almost always involved in the topic rather than the person. With extremely few exceptions. I'm not perfect. yet. But anyhow. [[WP:DENY]]. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 02:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270812 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270807 +++$+++ 270808 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.250156820E09 +++$+++ eh, we're discussing. let's not butt heads....  +++$+++ ::eh, we're discussing. let's not butt heads.... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 02:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270813 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270807 +++$+++ 270812 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.250157060E09 +++$+++ I find it amusing that SandyGeorgia  must remove my perfectly legitimate post to her  page. Unnecessarily [[WP:POINT|POINTy]], in my opinion. &mdash; +++$+++ ::: I find it amusing that SandyGeorgia  must remove my perfectly legitimate post to her  page. Unnecessarily [[WP:POINT|POINTy]], in my opinion. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:51, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270814 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270807 +++$+++ 270813 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.250157120E09 +++$+++ Your page IS a little more public than a confessional, methinks!  Judging from events!-- +++$+++ :::: Your page IS a little more public than a confessional, methinks!  Judging from events!--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 02:52, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270815 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270807 +++$+++ 270813 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.250157240E09 +++$+++ (ec) maybe it was pointy, I dunno,  but also yawn-worthy. I am so used to folks getting irritated at each other on-wiki that.. it kinda... washes off... so...maybe... it.. should... wash  off...  +++$+++ ::::(ec) maybe it was pointy, I dunno,  but also yawn-worthy. I am so used to folks getting irritated at each other on-wiki that.. it kinda... washes off... so...maybe... it.. should... wash  off... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 02:54, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270816 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270807 +++$+++ 270815 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.250157600E09 +++$+++ Amazing, isn't it? In real life this quality of mine made me a lot of money but here it is merely a curiosity that I garner so much attention. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::: Amazing, isn't it? In real life this quality of mine made me a lot of money but here it is merely a curiosity that I garner so much attention. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:00, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

532952 +++$+++ Maksdo +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-13 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.194994020E09 +++$+++ This summer I wanted to work on [[Carino\u2019s Italian Grill]] article but got busy and lost track of it. Now it is deleted. Is there any chance you could restore it and post on my talk page, so I can have some basis for jump start? Thank you.  +++$+++ This summer I wanted to work on [[Carino’s Italian Grill]] article but got busy and lost track of it. Now it is deleted. Is there any chance you could restore it and post on my talk page, so I can have some basis for jump start? Thank you. [[User:Maksdo|Maksdo]] 14:47, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
532953 +++$+++ Maksdo +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532952 +++$+++ 532952 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.195026180E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much! Being an inclusionist, I cry when I see articles going bye-bye. I will try to build something out of it so other can benefit. Appreciated.  +++$+++ :Thank you so much! Being an inclusionist, I cry when I see articles going bye-bye. I will try to build something out of it so other can benefit. Appreciated. [[User:Maksdo|Maksdo]] 23:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

532954 +++$+++ Number 57 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532954 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-19 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.195506660E09 +++$+++ Using your admin powers to lock the page in a place which you approve of is not exactly fair play either.  +++$+++ Using your admin powers to lock the page in a place which you approve of is not exactly fair play either. [[User:Number 57|<font color="orange">пﮟოьεԻ</font>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<font color="green">5</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<font color="blue">7</font>]] 13:11, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
532955 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532954 +++$+++ 532954 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.195506840E09 +++$+++ As stated, please use the talkpage to reach the consensus about the particular article. I locked it to the certain title to prevent edit warring, if a consensus is reached for the other title, I will be happy to unlock it and move it back. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : As stated, please use the talkpage to reach the consensus about the particular article. I locked it to the certain title to prevent edit warring, if a consensus is reached for the other title, I will be happy to unlock it and move it back. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
532956 +++$+++ Number 57 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532954 +++$+++ 532955 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.195507080E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't mind you locking it if you hadn't been involved before, but given that you have stated a preference for the title in the past on the talk page, I don't think it is appropriate for you to do so (I'm an admin too, and would definitely not do so).  +++$+++ ::I wouldn't mind you locking it if you hadn't been involved before, but given that you have stated a preference for the title in the past on the talk page, I don't think it is appropriate for you to do so (I'm an admin too, and would definitely not do so). [[User:Number 57|<font color="orange">пﮟოьεԻ</font>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<font color="green">5</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<font color="blue">7</font>]] 13:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
532957 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532954 +++$+++ 532956 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.195524240E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your comment. Indeed, I made a preference, but if I hadn't come across the article in the first place, I wouldn't even  notice the movings. I see that some discussion has begun already, let's see... Regards. --''' +++$+++ ::: I appreciate your comment. Indeed, I made a preference, but if I hadn't come across the article in the first place, I wouldn't even  notice the movings. I see that some discussion has begun already, let's see... Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
532958 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532954 +++$+++ 532954 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.195615740E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted in standard prod procedure, the reason was No [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], nothing to indicate [[WP:ORG|notability]]. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted in standard prod procedure, the reason was No [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], nothing to indicate [[WP:ORG|notability]]. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

8670 +++$+++ Sfan00 IMG +++$+++ Stephen Day +++$+++ 8670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-15 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.279262040E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/Stephen Day|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/Stephen Day|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> [[User:Sfan00 IMG|Sfan00 IMG]] ([[User talk:Sfan00 IMG|talk]]) 23:34, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
8671 +++$+++ Stephen Day +++$+++ Stephen Day +++$+++ 8670 +++$+++ 8670 +++$+++ 2010-07-17 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.279352700E09 +++$+++ The article that uses this image doesn't really need it. I'm not going to go through an effort to save it.  +++$+++ :The article that uses this image doesn't really need it. I'm not going to go through an effort to save it. [[User:Stephen Day|Stephen Day]] ([[User talk:Stephen Day#top|talk]]) 00:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

532959 +++$+++ Darth armitage +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-23 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.195884000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Darth armitage|Darth armitage]] ([[User talk:Darth armitage|talk]]) 22:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
532960 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532959 +++$+++ 532959 +++$+++ 2007-11-23 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.195884180E09 +++$+++ Right, you've put hangon on, I should have explained myself first. The reason is that it does not assert notability and it doesn't cite independent sources (myspace does not count). Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Right, you've put hangon on, I should have explained myself first. The reason is that it does not assert notability and it doesn't cite independent sources (myspace does not count). Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

8672 +++$+++ DASHBot +++$+++ Stephen Day +++$+++ 8672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-19 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.279542360E09 +++$+++ Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:DASHBot|DASHBot]] ([[User talk:DASHBot|talk]]) 05:26, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
8673 +++$+++ Stephen Day +++$+++ Stephen Day +++$+++ 8672 +++$+++ 8672 +++$+++ 2010-07-19 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.279542780E09 +++$+++ See my response to the above message.  +++$+++ :See my response to the above message. [[User:Stephen Day|Stephen Day]] ([[User talk:Stephen Day#top|talk]]) 05:33, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

270817 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-13 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.250157780E09 +++$+++ (undent, free the indentured colons of Wikipedia) <shrug> Wikipedia is its own weird world. Just shrug it off. Or rather, shrug the people off. I actually wish I could shrug off the issues; as time goes on, I'm becoming more apathetic....  +++$+++ (undent, free the indentured colons of Wikipedia) <shrug> Wikipedia is its own weird world. Just shrug it off. Or rather, shrug the people off. I actually wish I could shrug off the issues; as time goes on, I'm becoming more apathetic.... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 03:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270818 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.250158020E09 +++$+++ I must admit I am becoming more apathetic also. I have no real interest here anymore. There is nothing I care about. That is a loss, but so be it.  I figure it happens to everyone, as the \"lifespan\" here seems to be around three years.  &mdash; +++$+++ :I must admit I am becoming more apathetic also. I have no real interest here anymore. There is nothing I care about. That is a loss, but so be it.  I figure it happens to everyone, as the "lifespan" here seems to be around three years.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270819 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ 270818 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.250158320E09 +++$+++ (ec) I would like to actually edit articles more. I may do so. I enjoy making awards and images, though it is very, very  time-consuming. I am considering putting the \"does not want to be an admin\" ubox back on my bio page though. Blech. Argue this, argue that, blah blah blah. I weary myself nearly as much as others weary me.  +++$+++ ::(ec) I would like to actually edit articles more. I may do so. I enjoy making awards and images, though it is very, very  time-consuming. I am considering putting the "does not want to be an admin" ubox back on my bio page though. Blech. Argue this, argue that, blah blah blah. I weary myself nearly as much as others weary me. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 03:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270820 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.250158920E09 +++$+++ What can i say? I love the concept of Wikipedia. It's the reality that sorta has a mildly unpleasant odor. But then again, that describes most (but not all) of reality. ;-)  +++$+++ ::::What can i say? I love the concept of Wikipedia. It's the reality that sorta has a mildly unpleasant odor. But then again, that describes most (but not all) of reality. ;-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 03:22, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270821 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.250159580E09 +++$+++ I think it is the reviewing\/copy editing business that has the \"unpleasant order\" you describe. The article writing is enjoyable. I think I will get out of the grunt work business, stop worring abot the \"quality\" of wikipedia, and just do my own thing writing articles thaat I feel like doing, without trying to grab \"stars\" and \"awards\".  That is the only chance I see of regaining any pleasure and escaping the uglines. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I think it is the reviewing/copy editing business that has the "unpleasant order" you describe. The article writing is enjoyable. I think I will get out of the grunt work business, stop worring abot the "quality" of wikipedia, and just do my own thing writing articles thaat I feel like doing, without trying to grab "stars" and "awards".  That is the only chance I see of regaining any pleasure and escaping the uglines. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270822 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.250160360E09 +++$+++ (Ugh, too many colons.) Er, I am still looking for the fabled balance that leads to happiness. Article work often involves flying solo, which can get lonely after a while... But if content review is the locus of most of your unhappiness, then perhaps article work is the way to go. Prob is, content review involves much more interaction with others. Interaction with others is where we all wanna find that [[Cheers]]-like atmosphere. So perhaps (I think) the best way to go may be to find a Wikiproject in an interesting area & that has some active & friendly members, make friends with the latter and do content work in collaboration with them.  +++$+++ ::::::(Ugh, too many colons.) Er, I am still looking for the fabled balance that leads to happiness. Article work often involves flying solo, which can get lonely after a while... But if content review is the locus of most of your unhappiness, then perhaps article work is the way to go. Prob is, content review involves much more interaction with others. Interaction with others is where we all wanna find that [[Cheers]]-like atmosphere. So perhaps (I think) the best way to go may be to find a Wikiproject in an interesting area & that has some active & friendly members, make friends with the latter and do content work in collaboration with them. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 03:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270823 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.250160840E09 +++$+++ Wise words Ling.Nut. I'd have left wikipedia some time ago without the help and support of the [[WP:GM]] project. Even then, as you say, article work can be a pretty lonely furrow to plough, so I think it's all about getting the balance right between doing what you want to do and helping others. My feeling is that Mattisse sometimes hasn't been selfish enough. -- +++$+++ :::::::Wise words Ling.Nut. I'd have left wikipedia some time ago without the help and support of the [[WP:GM]] project. Even then, as you say, article work can be a pretty lonely furrow to plough, so I think it's all about getting the balance right between doing what you want to do and helping others. My feeling is that Mattisse sometimes hasn't been selfish enough. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 03:54, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270824 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.250160600E09 +++$+++ (ec) You've spent a lot of time reviewing\/copyediting Mattisse, perhaps too much relative to spending time on those topics that genuinely interest ''you''. Perhaps you're just feeling the effects of that imbalance right now. Reviewing in particular is pretty thankless, and there's no real sense of achievement, no matter how well you do it. -- +++$+++ ::::::(ec) You've spent a lot of time reviewing/copyediting Mattisse, perhaps too much relative to spending time on those topics that genuinely interest ''you''. Perhaps you're just feeling the effects of that imbalance right now. Reviewing in particular is pretty thankless, and there's no real sense of achievement, no matter how well you do it. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 03:50, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270825 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.250173620E09 +++$+++ I agree with what [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] and [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] have just said. Do what you ''enjoy'' doing rather than what you feel you ''ought'' to be doing. Associate with people who share your interests or whose company you find enjoyable for personal reasons, and <s>scr<\/s>forget the politics. \"My feeling is that Mattisse sometimes hasn't been selfish enough\" looks like a very good diagnosis. -- +++$+++ ::::::I agree with what [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] and [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] have just said. Do what you ''enjoy'' doing rather than what you feel you ''ought'' to be doing. Associate with people who share your interests or whose company you find enjoyable for personal reasons, and <s>scr</s>forget the politics. "My feeling is that Mattisse sometimes hasn't been selfish enough" looks like a very good diagnosis. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 07:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270826 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.250189340E09 +++$+++ Agree with that. When trying to put Wikipedia to rights got too tedious around the start of this year I turned to [[Wikipedia:WikiSloth|Wikisloth]] and took the Darwin anniversary opportunity to have fun writing a few minor articles, one of which turned out rather better than expected. Your help with the struggle to get that whimsy through FAC is hugely appreciated, hence the award below. However, the same goes for you: it's easy to get sucked into \"doing your duty\", but that's only worth doing if you find it rewarding. Fun comes first! . .  +++$+++ :::::::Agree with that. When trying to put Wikipedia to rights got too tedious around the start of this year I turned to [[Wikipedia:WikiSloth|Wikisloth]] and took the Darwin anniversary opportunity to have fun writing a few minor articles, one of which turned out rather better than expected. Your help with the struggle to get that whimsy through FAC is hugely appreciated, hence the award below. However, the same goes for you: it's easy to get sucked into "doing your duty", but that's only worth doing if you find it rewarding. Fun comes first! . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 11:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
270827 +++$+++ Yobmod +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.250235060E09 +++$+++ Which is all very well, but can anyone honestly say that for their next GAN, they don't wish Mattisse was there to review it? (just speaking up for those of us that would feel the lack of such great reviewers!) +++$+++ ::::::::Which is all very well, but can anyone honestly say that for their next GAN, they don't wish Mattisse was there to review it? (just speaking up for those of us that would feel the lack of such great reviewers!)[[User:Yobmod|<b><font color="#0000CD">Yob</font></b>]][[User talk:Yobmod|<b><font color="CC3399 ">Mod</font></b>]] 00:31, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270828 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.250236380E09 +++$+++ Thank you. However, I fear that GA standards are too low. But you are very kind. Unfortunately, Ga supports the propagation of psychological inventions publicized by one man. The article in question is a fork at best. But, hey, anything on pop culture gets a free pass. I give up on the task of giving psychiatry\/psychology any credibility on Wikipedia. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::Thank you. However, I fear that GA standards are too low. But you are very kind. Unfortunately, Ga supports the propagation of psychological inventions publicized by one man. The article in question is a fork at best. But, hey, anything on pop culture gets a free pass. I give up on the task of giving psychiatry/psychology any credibility on Wikipedia. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270829 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.250237340E09 +++$+++ I have to say that I could hardly disagree with you more Mattisse; all psychological\/psychiatric theories (yes, I do understand the difference between psychologists and psychiatrists) are the work of one man, like my all-time favourite [[cognitive dissonance]]. How many men were involved in the development of [[transactional analysis]]? How many men was Freud, Jung, or Adler? GA standards are neither \"too low\" nor too high, they simply represent a pragmatic attempt to improve the quality of this encyclopedia. Pragmatism has its limits, which are far short of perfection, admittedly.-- +++$+++ ::::::::::I have to say that I could hardly disagree with you more Mattisse; all psychological/psychiatric theories (yes, I do understand the difference between psychologists and psychiatrists) are the work of one man, like my all-time favourite [[cognitive dissonance]]. How many men were involved in the development of [[transactional analysis]]? How many men was Freud, Jung, or Adler? GA standards are neither "too low" nor too high, they simply represent a pragmatic attempt to improve the quality of this encyclopedia. Pragmatism has its limits, which are far short of perfection, admittedly.--[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 01:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270830 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.250237520E09 +++$+++ OK. So goes my faith in humankind and in GA. Feel free and have at it. Wreck what you will.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::: OK. So goes my faith in humankind and in GA. Feel free and have at it. Wreck what you will.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270831 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.250237640E09 +++$+++ You mean, I should withdraw my article, [[California's 12th congressional district election, 1946]], which has been waiting a month at GAN, from it because it is worthless?-- +++$+++ ::::::::::::You mean, I should withdraw my article, [[California's 12th congressional district election, 1946]], which has been waiting a month at GAN, from it because it is worthless?--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270832 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.250238000E09 +++$+++ Oh no! Another political article by you! Actually, I had not noticed it as I am basically getting out of the business of reviewing GA articles. I hope you are not going to guilt-trip me into doing it. You know I am already suspicious of you, as I suspect you are either 21 or 67 years old and I cannot tell which. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::::::: Oh no! Another political article by you! Actually, I had not noticed it as I am basically getting out of the business of reviewing GA articles. I hope you are not going to guilt-trip me into doing it. You know I am already suspicious of you, as I suspect you are either 21 or 67 years old and I cannot tell which. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:20, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

482043 +++$+++ Granpire Viking Man +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.163064900E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I didn't know that he was inactive for that long, and I think that that \"AD\" if you like, is actually like an article, but without a neutral point of view. I was just fixing a broken link too. -- +++$+++ Sorry, I didn't know that he was inactive for that long, and I think that that "AD" if you like, is actually like an article, but without a neutral point of view. I was just fixing a broken link too. --[[User:Granpire Viking Man|Granpire Viking Man]] 01:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
482044 +++$+++ Granpire Viking Man +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482043 +++$+++ 482043 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.163065500E09 +++$+++ By the way, he answered a question just a few weeks ago, so he couldn't have been inactive that long-- +++$+++ :By the way, he answered a question just a few weeks ago, so he couldn't have been inactive that long--[[User:Granpire Viking Man|Granpire Viking Man]] 01:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

480386 +++$+++ TenPoundHammer +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-09 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.270866720E09 +++$+++ Don't you think that making the Rolling Stones song the primary topic shows bias? If it stays at (Rolling Stones song) I'll be more than happy to fix the links. <span style=\"color:green\">Ten Pound Hammer<\/span>, his otters and a clue-bat \u2022 <sup>([[Special:Contributions\/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] \u2022 [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] \u2022  +++$+++ Don't you think that making the Rolling Stones song the primary topic shows bias? If it stays at (Rolling Stones song) I'll be more than happy to fix the links. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 19:32, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
480387 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480386 +++$+++ 480386 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.270877340E09 +++$+++ <<shrug>> I'd say that is the most famous \"version\", making it primary. The question boils down to popularity; if most people, when searching for [[Wild Horses (song)]], have the Stones' version in mind, the link should go there, with a hatnote for the other versions.  Just the other day, someone wanted to point [[Balzac]] to a disambig because there's other stuff called Balzac. But since a large number of searches and links are with the intention of finding the author, the author gets primary status - proper bias, I suppose.  Now, Wild Horses is much more debatable, and if the status quo stays I won't be upset. Mostly, I hope to see those who boldly move articles clean up after themselves. (I'm not at all worried about you, btw; I've seen you around and know you to be responsible; I only needed to make sure you were aware of the need of cleanup.) -- +++$+++ :<<shrug>> I'd say that is the most famous "version", making it primary. The question boils down to popularity; if most people, when searching for [[Wild Horses (song)]], have the Stones' version in mind, the link should go there, with a hatnote for the other versions.  Just the other day, someone wanted to point [[Balzac]] to a disambig because there's other stuff called Balzac. But since a large number of searches and links are with the intention of finding the author, the author gets primary status - proper bias, I suppose.  Now, Wild Horses is much more debatable, and if the status quo stays I won't be upset. Mostly, I hope to see those who boldly move articles clean up after themselves. (I'm not at all worried about you, btw; I've seen you around and know you to be responsible; I only needed to make sure you were aware of the need of cleanup.) --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 22:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

532968 +++$+++ 72.76.0.8 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532968 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-25 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.196027220E09 +++$+++ Thank you for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/delete&page=HX_(magazine)].  Can you take care of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/HX_Magazine] as well? Thanks.--[[Special:Contributions\/72.76.0.8|72.76.0.8]] ( +++$+++ Thank you for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=HX_(magazine)].  Can you take care of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HX_Magazine] as well? Thanks.--[[Special:Contributions/72.76.0.8|72.76.0.8]] ([[User talk:72.76.0.8|talk]]) 13:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
532969 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532968 +++$+++ 532968 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.196056500E09 +++$+++ I agree, after closer reading I think it is not db-bio, so I restored it. But please, fix the style and add references. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : I agree, after closer reading I think it is not db-bio, so I restored it. But please, fix the style and add references. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

525735 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-13 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.186989840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Michfan2123|michfan2123]] 00:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
525736 +++$+++ Craig.Scott +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525735 +++$+++ 525735 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.187030340E09 +++$+++ I'd rather see that info taken out of the infoboxes, to return them to the smaller neater form they had before. Like many infoboxes on Wikipedia, they are too big in relation to the size of the articles, and repeat too high a proportion of the information in the article for little or no benefit.  +++$+++ :I'd rather see that info taken out of the infoboxes, to return them to the smaller neater form they had before. Like many infoboxes on Wikipedia, they are too big in relation to the size of the articles, and repeat too high a proportion of the information in the article for little or no benefit. [[User:Craig.Scott|Craig.Scott]] 11:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

569426 +++$+++ Lethaniol +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-19 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.166592120E09 +++$+++ Cheers - you must hate userboxes - but as long as you are in the categories that is cool with me. Keep up the good work, and pop by [[WP:ADOPT]], especially the Adopter's area - there is a section now for Adopter's ecounting their experiences to help others.  +++$+++ Cheers - you must hate userboxes - but as long as you are in the categories that is cool with me. Keep up the good work, and pop by [[WP:ADOPT]], especially the Adopter's area - there is a section now for Adopter's ecounting their experiences to help others. [[User:Lethaniol|Lethaniol]] 21:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
569427 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569426 +++$+++ 569426 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.166592240E09 +++$+++ Not hate ''per se'', I just think that I have enough!  I will work visits to [[:WP:ADOPT]] in to my WP shifts - somehow! Regards,  +++$+++ :Not hate ''per se'', I just think that I have enough!  I will work visits to [[:WP:ADOPT]] in to my WP shifts - somehow! Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
569428 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569426 +++$+++ 569426 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166430480E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ :Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 00:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

532974 +++$+++ Giftoffer +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-26 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.196148540E09 +++$+++ You removed the border issue coverage in [[Slovenia]], and your explanation was that it's covered in another article. Where is it covered?  +++$+++ You removed the border issue coverage in [[Slovenia]], and your explanation was that it's covered in another article. Where is it covered? [[User:Giftoffer|Giftoffer]] ([[User talk:Giftoffer|talk]]) 23:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
532975 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532974 +++$+++ 532974 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.196150160E09 +++$+++ [[Gulf of Piran]] and probably more. In Croatia, there is a whole section in the international relations article. --''' +++$+++ : [[Gulf of Piran]] and probably more. In Croatia, there is a whole section in the international relations article. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 23:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

8689 +++$+++ Tvccs +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-17 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.161153360E09 +++$+++ Your changes are generally a mess, and there was no POV in the article as it existed, and you made no specific references to where you saw a POV.  You also butchered the layout, and now I get to spend hours reverting what you've done.   +++$+++ Your changes are generally a mess, and there was no POV in the article as it existed, and you made no specific references to where you saw a POV.  You also butchered the layout, and now I get to spend hours reverting what you've done.  [[User:Tvccs|Tvccs]] 23:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
8690 +++$+++ Tvccs +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8689 +++$+++ 8689 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.161154860E09 +++$+++ In looking at your contribution history, you have an obvious interest in the bass and bass guitar - in looking at your changes and deletions - it would be a POV to say Jaco Pastorius was innovative, because it's an unsourced \"POV\", even though we and thousands of others would agree with it.  Such criteria is a POV in and of itself, and if POV is that large a concern, your efforts might well have been better spent researching and linking\/bookmarking the content that was there.  The deletions you made on Soft Machine, for example, are completely inappropriate - Third is their largest selling record by far, was in print for many, many years, and is seen by most familiar with the Canterbury Scene as one of, if not the, leading recording of that era - Hugh Hopper's interviews, which are linked on his page and the Soft Machine page, support that. and I see little or no other contributions from you to anything else to do with Canterbury.  The various references cited in the article - most of which predated my contributions, support the prior article, as do other Wikipedia and other sources referenced.  It's also not appropriate to move the radio section down to the 1990's and 2000's section you renamed, it's not related. And the majority of other edits, no matter how well-intentioned, create havoc with the prior article, and reflect your own POV.  +++$+++ :In looking at your contribution history, you have an obvious interest in the bass and bass guitar - in looking at your changes and deletions - it would be a POV to say Jaco Pastorius was innovative, because it's an unsourced "POV", even though we and thousands of others would agree with it.  Such criteria is a POV in and of itself, and if POV is that large a concern, your efforts might well have been better spent researching and linking/bookmarking the content that was there.  The deletions you made on Soft Machine, for example, are completely inappropriate - Third is their largest selling record by far, was in print for many, many years, and is seen by most familiar with the Canterbury Scene as one of, if not the, leading recording of that era - Hugh Hopper's interviews, which are linked on his page and the Soft Machine page, support that. and I see little or no other contributions from you to anything else to do with Canterbury.  The various references cited in the article - most of which predated my contributions, support the prior article, as do other Wikipedia and other sources referenced.  It's also not appropriate to move the radio section down to the 1990's and 2000's section you renamed, it's not related. And the majority of other edits, no matter how well-intentioned, create havoc with the prior article, and reflect your own POV. [[User:Tvccs|Tvccs]] 00:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
8691 +++$+++ Tvccs +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8689 +++$+++ 8690 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.161155700E09 +++$+++ Speaking of POV, you are the only contributor to that article in the last however many months that feels that fusion was \"well-represented in the 1980's - nearly everyone else has concurred otherwise.  You also removed the section on virtuosity, which is also your POV - you have to be a virtuoso to play most of that music, and very few musicians can at the highest levels, or play and improvise in those meters, etc.   +++$+++ ::Speaking of POV, you are the only contributor to that article in the last however many months that feels that fusion was "well-represented in the 1980's - nearly everyone else has concurred otherwise.  You also removed the section on virtuosity, which is also your POV - you have to be a virtuoso to play most of that music, and very few musicians can at the highest levels, or play and improvise in those meters, etc.  [[User:Tvccs|Tvccs]] 00:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
8692 +++$+++ Tvccs +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8689 +++$+++ 8689 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.161649980E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your most recent comments - please use the page http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Tvccs, or discussion page, am I am using here, for future comments\/discussion with users.   +++$+++ :Thank you for your most recent comments - please use the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tvccs, or discussion page, am I am using here, for future comments/discussion with users.  [[User:Tvccs|Tvccs]] 17:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

8695 +++$+++ Tvccs +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-23 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164285240E09 +++$+++ I read your comments quickly...thought we'd leave them all here...but...as in the first go-round, you again deleted content i.e. Santana, which you discovered on further review the first time.  Please link here, if you would be so kind, articles you've generally created.  Thank you.   +++$+++ I read your comments quickly...thought we'd leave them all here...but...as in the first go-round, you again deleted content i.e. Santana, which you discovered on further review the first time.  Please link here, if you would be so kind, articles you've generally created.  Thank you.  [[User:Tvccs|Tvccs]] 04:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
8696 +++$+++ Tvccs +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8695 +++$+++ 8695 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.164308100E09 +++$+++ Let me also add, for the record, that I write for a NY Times newspaper, including material about music, and have for many years.  I've also written and produced dozens of television interviews and musical performances for more than ten years, and served as an editor and Executive Producer for many more.  I work directly with the artists themselves on numerous occasions, including Wikipedia.   +++$+++ *Let me also add, for the record, that I write for a NY Times newspaper, including material about music, and have for many years.  I've also written and produced dozens of television interviews and musical performances for more than ten years, and served as an editor and Executive Producer for many more.  I work directly with the artists themselves on numerous occasions, including Wikipedia.  [[User:Tvccs|Tvccs]] 10:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

8698 +++$+++ DCGeist +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8698 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-01 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.165040040E09 +++$+++ Hi, Nazamo. So...there aren't articles on either of them. I have a strong allergy to red links, but I'm resisting it here. If you start the articles, as you said, I'll help out as I can. I know nothing of Frank other than his seminal article (and maybe that's all there is to know); I have in my library most of what Silver has written, so I can certainly contribute there. Best, Dan \u2014 +++$+++ Hi, Nazamo. So...there aren't articles on either of them. I have a strong allergy to red links, but I'm resisting it here. If you start the articles, as you said, I'll help out as I can. I know nothing of Frank other than his seminal article (and maybe that's all there is to know); I have in my library most of what Silver has written, so I can certainly contribute there. Best, Dan —[[User:DCGeist|DCGeist]] 22:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
8699 +++$+++ DCGeist +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8698 +++$+++ 8698 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.165319220E09 +++$+++ Great. I'll see if there's anything on Frank in my library. As for oneiric\/oneirism, that's an interesting cite you give for \"oneirism.\" On the other hand, the very same source--i.e., Princeton--give for \"oneiric\": \"of or relating to or suggestive of dreams\" (see [http:\/\/wordnet.princeton.edu\/perl\/webwn?s=oneiric here]). Similarly, MedicineNet.com gives for \"oneiric\": \"Relating to dreams; dream-like.\" (see [http:\/\/www.medterms.com\/script\/main\/art.asp?articlekey=21057 here]). Not to mention the latest edition of the standard ''Merrian-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary'': \"of or relating to dreams : dreamy.\"  The translation, by the way, is direct; Borde and Chaumeton's original French is \"onirique.\" They use the word often, as they do the standard French noun for \"dream\": ''r\xeave''. In their discussion of noir, they never use the standard French noun for \"daydream\": ''r\xeaverie''.\u2014 +++$+++ :Great. I'll see if there's anything on Frank in my library. As for oneiric/oneirism, that's an interesting cite you give for "oneirism." On the other hand, the very same source--i.e., Princeton--give for "oneiric": "of or relating to or suggestive of dreams" (see [http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=oneiric here]). Similarly, MedicineNet.com gives for "oneiric": "Relating to dreams; dream-like." (see [http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=21057 here]). Not to mention the latest edition of the standard ''Merrian-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary'': "of or relating to dreams : dreamy."  The translation, by the way, is direct; Borde and Chaumeton's original French is "onirique." They use the word often, as they do the standard French noun for "dream": ''rêve''. In their discussion of noir, they never use the standard French noun for "daydream": ''rêverie''.—[[User:DCGeist|DCGeist]] 03:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
8700 +++$+++ DCGeist +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8698 +++$+++ 8699 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.165387920E09 +++$+++ Yes, that is interesting about Silver. I had vaguely heard that he was involved in film production, but had no sense to what extent until you raised it and I looked him up at IMDb. A somwhat comparable case is that of [[James Schamus]]--the very successful producer of Ang Lee's movies (''Brokeback'', ''Crouching Tiger''), he's also a professor of highbrow film theory and philosophy at Columbia University (I briefly attended a class of his there). Of course, Silver is the leading presence in the noir critical field; I don't believe Schamus has written nearly as much in terms of film theory\/history. Best, Dan\u2014 +++$+++ ::Yes, that is interesting about Silver. I had vaguely heard that he was involved in film production, but had no sense to what extent until you raised it and I looked him up at IMDb. A somwhat comparable case is that of [[James Schamus]]--the very successful producer of Ang Lee's movies (''Brokeback'', ''Crouching Tiger''), he's also a professor of highbrow film theory and philosophy at Columbia University (I briefly attended a class of his there). Of course, Silver is the leading presence in the noir critical field; I don't believe Schamus has written nearly as much in terms of film theory/history. Best, Dan—[[User:DCGeist|DCGeist]] 22:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
8701 +++$+++ DCGeist +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8698 +++$+++ 8700 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.165412460E09 +++$+++ Just had a chance to look at the Frank article--terrific job!\u2014 +++$+++ :::Just had a chance to look at the Frank article--terrific job!—[[User:DCGeist|DCGeist]] 05:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

482047 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482047 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.163109420E09 +++$+++ Re: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:NJ-FedRep&diff=86667887&oldid=86656241 this revert], I'm not going to revert your revert but please consider whether readers will benefit more from us showing lame duck reps or showing upcoming congress members which will likely be around for the next two years. \u2014 +++$+++ Re: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:NJ-FedRep&diff=86667887&oldid=86656241 this revert], I'm not going to revert your revert but please consider whether readers will benefit more from us showing lame duck reps or showing upcoming congress members which will likely be around for the next two years. —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 13:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
482048 +++$+++ ChrisRuvolo +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482047 +++$+++ 482047 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.163197200E09 +++$+++ WKnight, the template is clear that it is \"New Jersey's current delegation\".  Including Albio under that heading would not be factually correct. -- +++$+++ :WKnight, the template is clear that it is "New Jersey's current delegation".  Including Albio under that heading would not be factually correct. --[[User:ChrisRuvolo|ChrisRuvolo]] ([[User talk:ChrisRuvolo|t]]) 14:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

532990 +++$+++ Chaipau +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532990 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.196990340E09 +++$+++ You have deleted the page, even though I have responded to the notice that there are plans to expand the article, by moving much of the subsection in [[Assam]] to it.  I am not aware of any other votes on the deletion issue (I have it on my watch list and am not aware of any edits to the talk page).  Please restore the article.  Thanks.   +++$+++ You have deleted the page, even though I have responded to the notice that there are plans to expand the article, by moving much of the subsection in [[Assam]] to it.  I am not aware of any other votes on the deletion issue (I have it on my watch list and am not aware of any edits to the talk page).  Please restore the article.  Thanks.  [[User:Chaipau|Chaipau]] ([[User talk:Chaipau|talk]]) 17:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
532991 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532990 +++$+++ 532990 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.196990460E09 +++$+++ Hi. Well, the article practically had zero content and someone tagged it as prod. So it got deleted 5 days after tagging. If you are willing to expand it, I will gladly restore it. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Well, the article practically had zero content and someone tagged it as prod. So it got deleted 5 days after tagging. If you are willing to expand it, I will gladly restore it. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

532992 +++$+++ Cuchullain +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.197003300E09 +++$+++ The problem is we don't have a category for \"saints from what is now Croatia\", there are just too few of them. So, Marinus gets put in the generic Croatia cat. It's mainly for geographical reasons; this is standard practice for all the saints articles (For example saints from what is now America go in the American saints cat, even if they lived before the US was founded). There's really no better way to do it.-- +++$+++ The problem is we don't have a category for "saints from what is now Croatia", there are just too few of them. So, Marinus gets put in the generic Croatia cat. It's mainly for geographical reasons; this is standard practice for all the saints articles (For example saints from what is now America go in the American saints cat, even if they lived before the US was founded). There's really no better way to do it.--[[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 20:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
532993 +++$+++ Cuchullain +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532992 +++$+++ 532992 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.197005400E09 +++$+++ I don't know how they do things on other Wikipedias, I'm only in the saints WikiProject at this one. The Ancient Roman saints category is not useful as a geographical designation since it included many modern nations, and that's what we are trying to do with these categories. We are using \"Croatia\" as a geographical term, as in [[Croatia before the Croats]]; he is not being called a \"Croat saint\". Also note that \"Italy\" was a generic geographical term for the are long before the modern nation was founded. In some cases there are enough saints to have subcategories, notably [[:Category:British saints]], which has subcategories for [[:Category:Romano-British saints]] and [[:Category:Anglo-Saxon saints]], for example. In this case there are not enough entries to justify that. That is not the case here. There has been long standing consensus in the saints project (and in the saints categories in general) to use geographical terms in this way. If there is another well known geographical term in this case, you could suggest the category be renamed, but I don't know of any. -- +++$+++ :I don't know how they do things on other Wikipedias, I'm only in the saints WikiProject at this one. The Ancient Roman saints category is not useful as a geographical designation since it included many modern nations, and that's what we are trying to do with these categories. We are using "Croatia" as a geographical term, as in [[Croatia before the Croats]]; he is not being called a "Croat saint". Also note that "Italy" was a generic geographical term for the are long before the modern nation was founded. In some cases there are enough saints to have subcategories, notably [[:Category:British saints]], which has subcategories for [[:Category:Romano-British saints]] and [[:Category:Anglo-Saxon saints]], for example. In this case there are not enough entries to justify that. That is not the case here. There has been long standing consensus in the saints project (and in the saints categories in general) to use geographical terms in this way. If there is another well known geographical term in this case, you could suggest the category be renamed, but I don't know of any. --[[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 21:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
532994 +++$+++ Cuchullain +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532992 +++$+++ 532993 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.197005580E09 +++$+++ I have placed a disclaimer at the category explaining the use of the term. How is that?-- +++$+++ ::I have placed a disclaimer at the category explaining the use of the term. How is that?--[[User:Cuchullain|Cúchullain]] [[User talk:Cuchullain|<sup>t</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cuchullain|<small>c</small>]] 21:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

270849 +++$+++ Vadakkan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-14 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.250299800E09 +++$+++ Hello Mattisse.  With regard to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=307836394&oldid=307789346 this edit] on the [[Tamil language]] article, the dictionary does actually say the word is from Tamil or from a cognate word in another Dravidian language. The online interface to their dictionary only displays the first entry (a verb) by default - you need to click through to the second entry.  I've therefore taken out your tag - I hope this is OK.  Please feel free to re-insert it if I misunderstood your point. --  +++$+++ Hello Mattisse.  With regard to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=307836394&oldid=307789346 this edit] on the [[Tamil language]] article, the dictionary does actually say the word is from Tamil or from a cognate word in another Dravidian language. The online interface to their dictionary only displays the first entry (a verb) by default - you need to click through to the second entry.  I've therefore taken out your tag - I hope this is OK.  Please feel free to re-insert it if I misunderstood your point. -- [[User:Vadakkan|Arvind]] ([[User talk:Vadakkan|talk]]) 18:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270850 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270849 +++$+++ 270849 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.250300580E09 +++$+++ I will take your word for it, though I did search around to make sure it wasn't there. But if you say so, ok. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I will take your word for it, though I did search around to make sure it wasn't there. But if you say so, ok. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270851 +++$+++ Vadakkan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270849 +++$+++ 270850 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.250302860E09 +++$+++ I've [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=prev&oldid=307991958 changed] the reference to the OED, which is quite unambiguous. I hope that's better. -- +++$+++ ::I've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamil_language&diff=prev&oldid=307991958 changed] the reference to the OED, which is quite unambiguous. I hope that's better. --[[User:Vadakkan|Arvind]] ([[User talk:Vadakkan|talk]]) 19:21, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

525739 +++$+++ Golden Wattle +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-06 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.189148340E09 +++$+++ Hi - a flag on your template ([[Torres Strait Islander Flag]]) was copyrighted - see the article for reasons why.  Fair use doesn't cover use on user pages.  I have removed it.  Regards -- +++$+++ Hi - a flag on your template ([[Torres Strait Islander Flag]]) was copyrighted - see the article for reasons why.  Fair use doesn't cover use on user pages.  I have removed it.  Regards --[[User:Golden Wattle|Golden Wattle ]] <sup>[[User_talk:Golden Wattle|talk]]</sup> 23:59, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
525740 +++$+++ Golden Wattle +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525739 +++$+++ 525739 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.189148580E09 +++$+++ not a problem - it is somewhat unusual that a national flag should be copyrighted ... I am not surprised that you didn't realise :-) -- +++$+++ :not a problem - it is somewhat unusual that a national flag should be copyrighted ... I am not surprised that you didn't realise :-) --[[User:Golden Wattle|Golden Wattle ]] <sup>[[User_talk:Golden Wattle|talk]]</sup> 00:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

270852 +++$+++ Edhubbard +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270852 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-14 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.250315280E09 +++$+++ Hi Matisse, I just saw that you added a deadlink marker to the NICE guidelines webpage on the schizophrenia article.  I did a little poking around, and it looks like the guidelines were updated in February, 2009, but when I try to click on the links, the pdf causes my computer to freeze up.  The non-pdf part of the page is here: [http:\/\/guidance.nice.org.uk\/CG82] and I think the one that we want is the NICE guidelines updated here: [http:\/\/guidance.nice.org.uk\/CG82\/NiceGuidance\/pdf\/English] but since I can't make the pdf work, I can't actually read it over to verify that this update hasn't changed the content in such a way that this is no longer a valid reference.  Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Matisse, I just saw that you added a deadlink marker to the NICE guidelines webpage on the schizophrenia article.  I did a little poking around, and it looks like the guidelines were updated in February, 2009, but when I try to click on the links, the pdf causes my computer to freeze up.  The non-pdf part of the page is here: [http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG82] and I think the one that we want is the NICE guidelines updated here: [http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG82/NiceGuidance/pdf/English] but since I can't make the pdf work, I can't actually read it over to verify that this update hasn't changed the content in such a way that this is no longer a valid reference.  Cheers, [[User:Edhubbard|Edhubbard]] ([[User talk:Edhubbard|talk]]) 22:48, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270853 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270852 +++$+++ 270852 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.250315520E09 +++$+++ I can't get the pdf to open either. It is just an empty link. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I can't get the pdf to open either. It is just an empty link. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270854 +++$+++ Edhubbard +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270852 +++$+++ 270853 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.250315760E09 +++$+++ Oh, sorry, you have to click one more link beyond that... on that page, it only gives you the link to the pdf and tells you to make sure you have acrobat.  Here's the link directly to the pdf: [http:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/nicemedia\/pdf\/CG82NICEGuideline.pdf].  On my computer, it gets about halfway through downloading and then hangs, so don't click that link if you're in the middle of something important(!). Cheers,  +++$+++ :: Oh, sorry, you have to click one more link beyond that... on that page, it only gives you the link to the pdf and tells you to make sure you have acrobat.  Here's the link directly to the pdf: [http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG82NICEGuideline.pdf].  On my computer, it gets about halfway through downloading and then hangs, so don't click that link if you're in the middle of something important(!). Cheers, [[User:Edhubbard|Edhubbard]] ([[User talk:Edhubbard|talk]]) 22:56, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270855 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270852 +++$+++ 270854 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.250315940E09 +++$+++ That link is an empty link for me. It returns a blank page. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::: That link is an empty link for me. It returns a blank page. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:59, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270856 +++$+++ Edhubbard +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270852 +++$+++ 270855 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.250316240E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... and the other one too?  Curiouser and curiouser.  +++$+++ :::: Hmmm... and the other one too?  Curiouser and curiouser. [[User:Edhubbard|Edhubbard]] ([[User talk:Edhubbard|talk]]) 23:04, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270857 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270852 +++$+++ 270856 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.250316600E09 +++$+++ This one is not blank: http:\/\/guidance.nice.org.uk\/CG82 But that is the one you wanted to verify the text of, right? By looking at the pdf? This one is blank: http:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/nicemedia\/pdf\/CG82FullGuideline.pdf  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::: This one is not blank: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG82 But that is the one you wanted to verify the text of, right? By looking at the pdf? This one is blank: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG82FullGuideline.pdf  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270858 +++$+++ Edhubbard +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270852 +++$+++ 270857 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.250317380E09 +++$+++ Yeah, the second one, with the pdf in the title is the one that keeps hanging for me.  It opens part way, and then stops.  You might be having a version of the same problem I am, but even worse.  I can see that it's not completely blank when I try to open it, but it won't open all the way... what version of Acrobat do you have? I have Reader 8. In any case, NICE needs to make these things more readable.   Cheers,  +++$+++ :::::: Yeah, the second one, with the pdf in the title is the one that keeps hanging for me.  It opens part way, and then stops.  You might be having a version of the same problem I am, but even worse.  I can see that it's not completely blank when I try to open it, but it won't open all the way... what version of Acrobat do you have? I have Reader 8. In any case, NICE needs to make these things more readable.   Cheers, [[User:Edhubbard|Edhubbard]] ([[User talk:Edhubbard|talk]]) 23:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270859 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270852 +++$+++ 270858 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.250317620E09 +++$+++ I have the plug in for Firefox 3.0.13. It updates automatically so I am sure it is Reader 8. I don't normally have any problems opening a pdf.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::I have the plug in for Firefox 3.0.13. It updates automatically so I am sure it is Reader 8. I don't normally have any problems opening a pdf.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:27, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

532997 +++$+++ Rp +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-14 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.197703740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Rp|Rp]] ([[User talk:Rp|talk]]) 23:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
532998 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532997 +++$+++ 532997 +++$+++ 2007-12-15 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.197754620E09 +++$+++ Well, ok, Let's say it is not spam. Nevertehless, it does not establish notability - why should there be an article about it on the WP? Is it a widely used? Associated with some other important software? And it needs references as well. If you are willing to improve the article, I can restore it. But otherwise, Wp is an encyclopedia, it is not a catalogue of everything. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Well, ok, Let's say it is not spam. Nevertehless, it does not establish notability - why should there be an article about it on the WP? Is it a widely used? Associated with some other important software? And it needs references as well. If you are willing to improve the article, I can restore it. But otherwise, Wp is an encyclopedia, it is not a catalogue of everything. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
532999 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532997 +++$+++ 532997 +++$+++ 2007-12-16 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.197858540E09 +++$+++ Hi. I must have missed your post, sorry. If you are willing to exapand the article, I can restore it. The article didn't mention any lead roles. By the way, I just deleted the article under a standard procedure, someone tagged it as a prod. So, shall I restoer it? --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I must have missed your post, sorry. If you are willing to exapand the article, I can restore it. The article didn't mention any lead roles. By the way, I just deleted the article under a standard procedure, someone tagged it as a prod. So, shall I restoer it? --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

8712 +++$+++ Oo7565 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8712 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.176345720E09 +++$+++ Another editor has added the \"{{tl|prod}}\" template to the article [[Art television]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability]]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at [[Talk:Art television|its talk page]]. If you remove the {{tl|prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  +++$+++ Another editor has added the "{{tl|prod}}" template to the article [[Art television]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability]]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at [[Talk:Art television|its talk page]]. If you remove the {{tl|prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. [[User:Oo7565|Oo7565]] 19:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
8713 +++$+++ Jajasoon +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8712 +++$+++ 8712 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.176366600E09 +++$+++ My delete suggestion wasn't meant to be harsh, but I don't think the term is sufficiently noteworthy to warrant its own topic. Perhaps as a paragraph section on Kristin Thompson's page, or under a broader television article. -- +++$+++ :My delete suggestion wasn't meant to be harsh, but I don't think the term is sufficiently noteworthy to warrant its own topic. Perhaps as a paragraph section on Kristin Thompson's page, or under a broader television article. --[[User:Jajasoon|Jajasoon]] 01:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

8714 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-12 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.176435840E09 +++$+++ The problem is that this isn't a straightforward, objective concept; it's an evaluative notion (as if we were to have one article on [[Music]] and one on [[Good music]]). I honestly doubt that it would survive an [[WP:AFD|AfD]]. -- +++$+++ The problem is that this isn't a straightforward, objective concept; it's an evaluative notion (as if we were to have one article on [[Music]] and one on [[Good music]]). I honestly doubt that it would survive an [[WP:AFD|AfD]]. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]) 20:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
8715 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8714 +++$+++ 8714 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.176436620E09 +++$+++ Well yes, but scholars and critics also talk about \"great art\" and \"good music\", \"good food\" and \"fine wine\" &mdash; evaluations all.  \"Quality television\" isn't a term of art any more than any of the others; like them there will probably be a great deal of agreement among mature, educated people &mdash; but it's still not objective. -- +++$+++ :Well yes, but scholars and critics also talk about "great art" and "good music", "good food" and "fine wine" &mdash; evaluations all.  "Quality television" isn't a term of art any more than any of the others; like them there will probably be a great deal of agreement among mature, educated people &mdash; but it's still not objective. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]) 20:57, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

533003 +++$+++ Tcisco +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533003 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-17 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.197951900E09 +++$+++ Thank you for removing the POV tag.   +++$+++ Thank you for removing the POV tag.  [[User:Tcisco|Tcisco]] ([[User talk:Tcisco|talk]]) 20:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
533004 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533003 +++$+++ 533003 +++$+++ 2007-12-18 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.198013760E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. If you are not familiar with the wiki syntax, you should first check [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page]], they have a nice tutorial there. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. If you are not familiar with the wiki syntax, you should first check [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page]], they have a nice tutorial there. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

270860 +++$+++ Edhubbard +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-14 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.250318100E09 +++$+++ (undent) Ok, so I'm using Firefox 3.5.2 normally, but based on your comment, I just tried it with IE (I hate to do that!) and it seems to work in IE.  So, perhaps this is a compatibility issue with Firefox that NICE hasn't tested?  Not nice NICE.  Can you let me know if it works for you?  I'm going to start looking to see if the pdf still contains the relevant info. Cheers,   +++$+++ (undent) Ok, so I'm using Firefox 3.5.2 normally, but based on your comment, I just tried it with IE (I hate to do that!) and it seems to work in IE.  So, perhaps this is a compatibility issue with Firefox that NICE hasn't tested?  Not nice NICE.  Can you let me know if it works for you?  I'm going to start looking to see if the pdf still contains the relevant info. Cheers,  [[User:Edhubbard|Edhubbard]] ([[User talk:Edhubbard|talk]]) 23:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270861 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270860 +++$+++ 270860 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.250318520E09 +++$+++ The only reason I have not upgraded to Firefox 3.5 is that I am concerned that some of my add-ons (upon which I depend) won't work. Have you had any trouble?  I tried the link in my IE 8 (I believe) and it is still a blank page. Don't know what to think. &mdash; +++$+++ :The only reason I have not upgraded to Firefox 3.5 is that I am concerned that some of my add-ons (upon which I depend) won't work. Have you had any trouble?  I tried the link in my IE 8 (I believe) and it is still a blank page. Don't know what to think. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270862 +++$+++ Edhubbard +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270860 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.250318100E09 +++$+++ Ok, so I'm using Firefox 3.5.2 normally, but based on your comment, I just tried it with IE (I hate to do that!) and it seems to work in IE.  So, perhaps this is a compatibility issue with Firefox that NICE hasn't tested?  Not nice NICE.  Can you let me know if it works for you?  I'm going to start looking to see if the pdf still contains the relevant info. Cheers,   +++$+++ ::::::: Ok, so I'm using Firefox 3.5.2 normally, but based on your comment, I just tried it with IE (I hate to do that!) and it seems to work in IE.  So, perhaps this is a compatibility issue with Firefox that NICE hasn't tested?  Not nice NICE.  Can you let me know if it works for you?  I'm going to start looking to see if the pdf still contains the relevant info. Cheers,  [[User:Edhubbard|Edhubbard]] ([[User talk:Edhubbard|talk]]) 23:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270863 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270860 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.250318520E09 +++$+++ The only reason I have not upgraded to Firefox 3.5 is that I am concerned that some of my add-ons (upon which I depend) won't work. Have you had any trouble?  I tried the link in my IE 8 (I believe) and it is still a blank page. Don't know what to think. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::::The only reason I have not upgraded to Firefox 3.5 is that I am concerned that some of my add-ons (upon which I depend) won't work. Have you had any trouble?  I tried the link in my IE 8 (I believe) and it is still a blank page. Don't know what to think. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270864 +++$+++ Edhubbard +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270860 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.250319300E09 +++$+++ So, it seems that some things might have changed with the addition of new evidence, and it might be worth figuring out how to get this new information incorporated into the article, or at least to temper conclusions that have been superseded by new evidence.  I'll take a look through this thing, but it's 399 pages long, and comes in at 3.16 MB, so a sizeable document. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::::::: So, it seems that some things might have changed with the addition of new evidence, and it might be worth figuring out how to get this new information incorporated into the article, or at least to temper conclusions that have been superseded by new evidence.  I'll take a look through this thing, but it's 399 pages long, and comes in at 3.16 MB, so a sizeable document. Cheers, [[User:Edhubbard|Edhubbard]] ([[User talk:Edhubbard|talk]]) 23:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
270865 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270860 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.250319720E09 +++$+++ Well, that is rather vague and disheartening. It is rather like antidepressants. The end of the road seems to have been reached  there and we are in need a new concept, or to reach back further in the causal chain to wherever neurotransmitters arise, instead of influencing them directly. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::: Well, that is rather vague and disheartening. It is rather like antidepressants. The end of the road seems to have been reached  there and we are in need a new concept, or to reach back further in the causal chain to wherever neurotransmitters arise, instead of influencing them directly. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:02, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
270866 +++$+++ Edhubbard +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270860 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.250320620E09 +++$+++ Yes, I agree that we're reaching a sort of plateau with what the meds can currently do.  My fiancee is a sz researcher (post-doc with Stephan Heckers at Vanderbilt Psychiatry [http:\/\/www.mc.vanderbilt.edu\/root\/vumc.php?site=psychiatry&doc=9886]) and one of the things that seems to be the wave of the future is early detection and a sort of \"pre-habilitation\", even prior to the first episode, since after even a single episode, patients rarely, if ever, attain their pre-morbid state.  So, early markers, endophenotypes, etc, etc are becoming the hot topics, for example at SOBP. Of course, this is all complicated by the fact that the genetics people have turned up at least a dozen genes.  I did see part of a great symposium at SFN about a year and a half ago where they talked about how the genes link up to pathways, and there might be some specific targets there.  So, I'm optimistic about the long-term future, but in the short-term, I agree that this line of treatment is reaching the limits of where we can hope to go... of course, this is still better than just 100 years ago.  +++$+++ ::::::::::: Yes, I agree that we're reaching a sort of plateau with what the meds can currently do.  My fiancee is a sz researcher (post-doc with Stephan Heckers at Vanderbilt Psychiatry [http://www.mc.vanderbilt.edu/root/vumc.php?site=psychiatry&doc=9886]) and one of the things that seems to be the wave of the future is early detection and a sort of "pre-habilitation", even prior to the first episode, since after even a single episode, patients rarely, if ever, attain their pre-morbid state.  So, early markers, endophenotypes, etc, etc are becoming the hot topics, for example at SOBP. Of course, this is all complicated by the fact that the genetics people have turned up at least a dozen genes.  I did see part of a great symposium at SFN about a year and a half ago where they talked about how the genes link up to pathways, and there might be some specific targets there.  So, I'm optimistic about the long-term future, but in the short-term, I agree that this line of treatment is reaching the limits of where we can hope to go... of course, this is still better than just 100 years ago. [[User:Edhubbard|Edhubbard]] ([[User talk:Edhubbard|talk]]) 00:17, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
270867 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270860 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.250321220E09 +++$+++ Long-term optimism yes. But having received the [[Schizophrenia Bulletin]] since the 1970s I think perhaps that will be in the twilight of my lifetime, if then. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::::::: Long-term optimism yes. But having received the [[Schizophrenia Bulletin]] since the 1970s I think perhaps that will be in the twilight of my lifetime, if then. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

533005 +++$+++ Alai +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-20 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.198208220E09 +++$+++ The standard would be {{cl|physics organization stubs}} (as we discussed at some length at the proposals page), to avoid the clumsy double plural.  Any objection if I change it back?   +++$+++ The standard would be {{cl|physics organization stubs}} (as we discussed at some length at the proposals page), to avoid the clumsy double plural.  Any objection if I change it back?  [[User:Alai|Alai]] ([[User talk:Alai|talk]]) 19:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
533006 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533005 +++$+++ 533005 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.198208580E09 +++$+++ No objection. I just thought that we somehow skipped the ploral form as it is in the Category:Physics organizations. By the way, I would really like to find a way to include the experiments in the category but I ran out of ideas. Maybe another time. --''' +++$+++ : No objection. I just thought that we somehow skipped the ploral form as it is in the Category:Physics organizations. By the way, I would really like to find a way to include the experiments in the category but I ran out of ideas. Maybe another time. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
533007 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533005 +++$+++ 533005 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.200965880E09 +++$+++ Hi. These articles were deleted after a debate that took place [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Francis Cavanaugh|here]]. If you have relevant sources, add the references by all means. I can restore the articles so you can work on them. But because they were deleted in a process, I would appreciate if you could fix them soon, like in a week or so. Just so that they other editors won't complain on recreation of deleted articles. Tell me if it's ok with you and when do you want me to restore them. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. These articles were deleted after a debate that took place [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Cavanaugh|here]]. If you have relevant sources, add the references by all means. I can restore the articles so you can work on them. But because they were deleted in a process, I would appreciate if you could fix them soon, like in a week or so. Just so that they other editors won't complain on recreation of deleted articles. Tell me if it's ok with you and when do you want me to restore them. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
533008 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533005 +++$+++ 533007 +++$+++ 2008-01-22 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.201017660E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ :: Ok, restored. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

8718 +++$+++ MadMaxDog +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-25 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.180112520E09 +++$+++ Responded on my page. Cheers.  +++$+++ Responded on my page. Cheers. [[User:MadMaxDog|MadMaxDog]] 10:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
8719 +++$+++ MadMaxDog +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8718 +++$+++ 8718 +++$+++ 2007-06-08 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.181333700E09 +++$+++ Again, I am impressed at the stuff you have added to the page. Even if it again meant I had to clean up some refs...  +++$+++ :Again, I am impressed at the stuff you have added to the page. Even if it again meant I had to clean up some refs... [[User:MadMaxDog|MadMaxDog]] 13:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

533009 +++$+++ Managerpants +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533009 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-24 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.198537080E09 +++$+++ Thanks! -- +++$+++ Thanks! --[[User:Managerpants|Managerpants]] ([[User talk:Managerpants|talk]]) 14:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
533010 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533009 +++$+++ 533009 +++$+++ 2007-12-24 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.198547280E09 +++$+++ Hi. I don't object that the list is useful the way it is. However, it is not encyclopedic, as the WP content is supposed to be. If someone wants to have a look at the specific person, it is always possible to use the search box on the left. In my opinion, the list is redundant but if you want more people to join the discussion, I will be happy to restore it and put it to AfD. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I don't object that the list is useful the way it is. However, it is not encyclopedic, as the WP content is supposed to be. If someone wants to have a look at the specific person, it is always possible to use the search box on the left. In my opinion, the list is redundant but if you want more people to join the discussion, I will be happy to restore it and put it to AfD. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
533011 +++$+++ Managerpants +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533009 +++$+++ 533010 +++$+++ 2007-12-24 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.198548300E09 +++$+++ That sounds good. I appreciate it! -- +++$+++ ::That sounds good. I appreciate it! --[[User:Managerpants|Managerpants]] ([[User talk:Managerpants|talk]]) 18:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

8723 +++$+++ East718 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.183602900E09 +++$+++ Please reply on my talk page if you have any other concerns. Thanks! ''' +++$+++ Please reply on my talk page if you have any other concerns. Thanks! '''[[User:east718|<small style="color:black">east</small>]]<font color="green">.</font>[[User talk:east718|<small style="color:gray">718</small>]]''' 19:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
8724 +++$+++ East718 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8723 +++$+++ 8723 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.183602960E09 +++$+++ Looks like you beat my message, great job on the additions! ''' +++$+++ :Looks like you beat my message, great job on the additions! '''[[User:east718|<small style="color:black">east</small>]]<font color="green">.</font>[[User talk:east718|<small style="color:gray">718</small>]]''' 19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

270868 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270868 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-15 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.250353800E09 +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse. I think your comments at [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment\/M\xfcnchausen by Internet\/1]] and the responses they received may be an example of the difficulties experts in a subject experience at WP. The upside is your thorough knowledge of the subject area, but one of the downsides is excessive concentration on the way in which experts analyse the topic, when there may be other ways of looking at it - a good example of this might be Jesus, about whom theologians, textual critics and historians of 1st century Judea would all adopt very different perspectives. M\xfcnchausen by Internet may not deserve its own entry in DSM, since (from the point of this very non-expert) it looks like the core behaviours and causes are standard M\xfcnchausen's. However the way in which it seems to play out on the Internet appears to be distinctive and to have caught some attention, at least for a while. I've added my name to the list of willing reviewers if it's re-nominated, and if I wind up reviewing the article and not crushed in the January-sales rush, I hope I could ask your advice on the technical aspects. -- +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse. I think your comments at [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Münchausen by Internet/1]] and the responses they received may be an example of the difficulties experts in a subject experience at WP. The upside is your thorough knowledge of the subject area, but one of the downsides is excessive concentration on the way in which experts analyse the topic, when there may be other ways of looking at it - a good example of this might be Jesus, about whom theologians, textual critics and historians of 1st century Judea would all adopt very different perspectives. Münchausen by Internet may not deserve its own entry in DSM, since (from the point of this very non-expert) it looks like the core behaviours and causes are standard Münchausen's. However the way in which it seems to play out on the Internet appears to be distinctive and to have caught some attention, at least for a while. I've added my name to the list of willing reviewers if it's re-nominated, and if I wind up reviewing the article and not crushed in the January-sales rush, I hope I could ask your advice on the technical aspects. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 09:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
270869 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270868 +++$+++ 270868 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.250365620E09 +++$+++ Does Feldman mention message boards,  IRC etc.? He is concerned about on-line support groups for health issues only.[http:\/\/www.selfhelpmagazine.com\/articles\/chronic\/faking.html] I don't think Feldman is into the other behaviors mentioned farther down, such as [[stalking]]. Stalking has little to do with the motivations behind [[Factitious disorders]] and therefore, by analogy, presumably behind M\xfcnchausen by Internet.  The editor has interjected OR and this must be carefully checked. Articles that mention problems that \"sound\" like they are talking about [[M\xfcnchausen by Internet]] but do not mention the \"diagnosis\" of M\xfcnchausen by Internet should '''not''' be used to support the article editor's thesis that these are the same. The article is OR the way it is written now.  You need someone besides Feldman validating the term, not just someone '''mentioning''' Feldman and his term. Wikipedia will become a major vehicle to push Feldman and his term.[http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&=&q=M%C3%BCnchausen+by+Internet&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=] If you check this article as carefully as you checked [[Talk:Manchester Mark 1\/GA1|the article by Malleus you reviewed]], you should have no problem, and make sure the statements are supported with no weasel words. Who uses this term to \"classify behaviors\", for what purpose  and under what conditions? Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Does Feldman mention message boards,  IRC etc.? He is concerned about on-line support groups for health issues only.[http://www.selfhelpmagazine.com/articles/chronic/faking.html] I don't think Feldman is into the other behaviors mentioned farther down, such as [[stalking]]. Stalking has little to do with the motivations behind [[Factitious disorders]] and therefore, by analogy, presumably behind Münchausen by Internet.  The editor has interjected OR and this must be carefully checked. Articles that mention problems that "sound" like they are talking about [[Münchausen by Internet]] but do not mention the "diagnosis" of Münchausen by Internet should '''not''' be used to support the article editor's thesis that these are the same. The article is OR the way it is written now.  You need someone besides Feldman validating the term, not just someone '''mentioning''' Feldman and his term. Wikipedia will become a major vehicle to push Feldman and his term.[http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&=&q=M%C3%BCnchausen+by+Internet&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=] If you check this article as carefully as you checked [[Talk:Manchester Mark 1/GA1|the article by Malleus you reviewed]], you should have no problem, and make sure the statements are supported with no weasel words. Who uses this term to "classify behaviors", for what purpose  and under what conditions? Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:47, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

525742 +++$+++ SJS1971 +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525742 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-11 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.189556820E09 +++$+++ I really should chew you out for stealing my menu... except that then the guy I stole it from my come looking for me... :0  +++$+++ I really should chew you out for stealing my menu... except that then the guy I stole it from my come looking for me... :0 [[User:SJS1971|SJS1971]] 17:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
525743 +++$+++ Hokeman +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525742 +++$+++ 525742 +++$+++ 2007-09-23 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.190582340E09 +++$+++ It's going to be very difficult to find this information in one place.  Sometimes you can get lucky and put in the name of an old tournament in a search engine (I've been using the '''Dogpile''' search engine lately), and there will be an article somewhere that gives you a great deal of info. I've started searching the articles of older guys who won a lot of PGA events in the 1950s and 1960s (e.g. Palmer, Finsterwald, Rosburg) and writing each tournament which doesn't have an article in a notebook -trying to reconstruct it that way. Lastly, I live in Florida, and plan to visit the bookstore at the Hall of Fame sometime before the end of the year to look for a book that has all the old tournaments. If I find anything, I'll let you know. Keep up the good work that you've been doing!!-- +++$+++ * It's going to be very difficult to find this information in one place.  Sometimes you can get lucky and put in the name of an old tournament in a search engine (I've been using the '''Dogpile''' search engine lately), and there will be an article somewhere that gives you a great deal of info. I've started searching the articles of older guys who won a lot of PGA events in the 1950s and 1960s (e.g. Palmer, Finsterwald, Rosburg) and writing each tournament which doesn't have an article in a notebook -trying to reconstruct it that way. Lastly, I live in Florida, and plan to visit the bookstore at the Hall of Fame sometime before the end of the year to look for a book that has all the old tournaments. If I find anything, I'll let you know. Keep up the good work that you've been doing!!--[[User:Hokeman|Hokeman]] 14:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

270870 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-15 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.250368200E09 +++$+++ As ever, I will remain interested in improving the article. I am wholly disinterested in another round of argument and drama with Mattisse. GA process fail. ArbCom fail. Mattisse win. Everyone goes home happy. -- +++$+++ As ever, I will remain interested in improving the article. I am wholly disinterested in another round of argument and drama with Mattisse. GA process fail. ArbCom fail. Mattisse win. Everyone goes home happy. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 13:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
270871 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.250368740E09 +++$+++ Hi Mon3, I am merely concerned about the encyclopedia. It is not for us to write articles on novel topics that are \"similar to the discovery of a new organism\", as you say you are doing. Wikipedia is a tertiary source, not for the synthesis of new information. I suggest you  recast the article per Malleus's comments on the article talk page and clear up what he called the article's \"identity crisis.\" Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Hi Mon3, I am merely concerned about the encyclopedia. It is not for us to write articles on novel topics that are "similar to the discovery of a new organism", as you say you are doing. Wikipedia is a tertiary source, not for the synthesis of new information. I suggest you  recast the article per Malleus's comments on the article talk page and clear up what he called the article's "identity crisis." Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:39, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
270872 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 270871 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.250375220E09 +++$+++ I didn't pass anything on to anyone. What I said was that if the article was renominated at GAN and not picked up quickly then I would undertake to do the review. It's my belief from my own experience that Philcha would do a fine job, very likely better than I would have done, and the article would be significantly improved in the the process, so it would be disappointing if it were not renominated. Re your general comments, I think the tenor of the whole discussion surrounding this review started off badly because of the poor decision made by the original reviewer to (effectively) quickfail the article, and has gradually become less and less helpful. I broadly agree with the position that Mattisse has espoused, although I do regret thst she was unable to strike a less gladiatorial tone. The poor experiences some others of us have had with that reviewer earlier also didn't help in producing a more collegial atmosphere, and I'm perhaps as much to blame as anyone for that. Perhaps one day I'll be perfect, but I've still got a ways to go. -- +++$+++ ::I didn't pass anything on to anyone. What I said was that if the article was renominated at GAN and not picked up quickly then I would undertake to do the review. It's my belief from my own experience that Philcha would do a fine job, very likely better than I would have done, and the article would be significantly improved in the the process, so it would be disappointing if it were not renominated. Re your general comments, I think the tenor of the whole discussion surrounding this review started off badly because of the poor decision made by the original reviewer to (effectively) quickfail the article, and has gradually become less and less helpful. I broadly agree with the position that Mattisse has espoused, although I do regret thst she was unable to strike a less gladiatorial tone. The poor experiences some others of us have had with that reviewer earlier also didn't help in producing a more collegial atmosphere, and I'm perhaps as much to blame as anyone for that. Perhaps one day I'll be perfect, but I've still got a ways to go. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 15:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
270873 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 270872 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.250462700E09 +++$+++ I don't know how to express my disappointment in this ArbCom mentor process. It seems I would basically have to behave like Mattisse to get you folks to do your jobs. Instead, I disengage, remark only about content, refuse to rise to the accusations that I'm synthesizing information and conducting original research, while Mattisse defends an indefensible and astonishingly incompetent GA review. Seriously, is decency so foreign to Wikipedia? I am refusing to renominate the GA, not because I don't think the article does not meet the criteria, but because of the stress and headache I will go through while she rambles on, displaying a complete lack of understanding for core Wikipedia policies. I'm seriously considering abandoning review processes altogether, which is unfortunate because I really would like the articles I write to be the best they can be. Is your desire to be able to end your posts with winky-faces what compels you to be impotent? Do I have to bring out more effective language and say that Mattisse is full of neurotic bullshit, and scream like a mentally imbalanced 14-year-old? Or is this the honest to God best you folks can do? -- +++$+++ :::I don't know how to express my disappointment in this ArbCom mentor process. It seems I would basically have to behave like Mattisse to get you folks to do your jobs. Instead, I disengage, remark only about content, refuse to rise to the accusations that I'm synthesizing information and conducting original research, while Mattisse defends an indefensible and astonishingly incompetent GA review. Seriously, is decency so foreign to Wikipedia? I am refusing to renominate the GA, not because I don't think the article does not meet the criteria, but because of the stress and headache I will go through while she rambles on, displaying a complete lack of understanding for core Wikipedia policies. I'm seriously considering abandoning review processes altogether, which is unfortunate because I really would like the articles I write to be the best they can be. Is your desire to be able to end your posts with winky-faces what compels you to be impotent? Do I have to bring out more effective language and say that Mattisse is full of neurotic bullshit, and scream like a mentally imbalanced 14-year-old? Or is this the honest to God best you folks can do? --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 15:45, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270874 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 270873 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.250465220E09 +++$+++ [[WP:POT]] evidently applies, I suggest that you strike these aggressive and [[WP:CIV|uncivil]] assertions. A bit more patience and a suitable plea to uninvolved editors is more likely to be succeed than this evidently unproductive name-calling. . .  +++$+++ ::::[[WP:POT]] evidently applies, I suggest that you strike these aggressive and [[WP:CIV|uncivil]] assertions. A bit more patience and a suitable plea to uninvolved editors is more likely to be succeed than this evidently unproductive name-calling. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 16:27, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270875 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 270874 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.250466180E09 +++$+++ So yes, it is that sort of language that earns attention. Those who wish to exist outside of this culture are unto themselves, apparently. Someone who creates a melodramatic scene merely hinted at by my previous post makes people uncomfortable, but the respectful decency I employ on a regular basis gives others the impression that things are swell. Mattisse's behavior, obviously, plays no part in this which I find perverse. Conflict forces value reassessment, as is illustrated in many articles on this website, some of which I have written. My passivity and respectfulness has not accomplished that. I am challenging this wiki-culture that follows such a status-quo. I heartily dislike using hurtful language, but it is the equivalent to laying down in front of the Food and Drug Administration in a public die-in to get arrested in front of the media. If I have to start peppering my posts with \"fuck\" and start ranting about conspiracy, might that inspire action as well? How about if her mentors start addressing her behavior so articles can be improved? -- +++$+++ :::::So yes, it is that sort of language that earns attention. Those who wish to exist outside of this culture are unto themselves, apparently. Someone who creates a melodramatic scene merely hinted at by my previous post makes people uncomfortable, but the respectful decency I employ on a regular basis gives others the impression that things are swell. Mattisse's behavior, obviously, plays no part in this which I find perverse. Conflict forces value reassessment, as is illustrated in many articles on this website, some of which I have written. My passivity and respectfulness has not accomplished that. I am challenging this wiki-culture that follows such a status-quo. I heartily dislike using hurtful language, but it is the equivalent to laying down in front of the Food and Drug Administration in a public die-in to get arrested in front of the media. If I have to start peppering my posts with "fuck" and start ranting about conspiracy, might that inspire action as well? How about if her mentors start addressing her behavior so articles can be improved? --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 16:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270876 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 270875 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.250466360E09 +++$+++ I never saw your posts about sending sources etc. I un-volunteered my help 'cause I'm busy and 'cause Philcha would do as well or better than i could. But I re-volunteer. Go ahead and send me those sources, if you want, although I believe there is no need to do so, because I believe your contributions are completely in order and above reproach.  +++$+++ ::::::I never saw your posts about sending sources etc. I un-volunteered my help 'cause I'm busy and 'cause Philcha would do as well or better than i could. But I re-volunteer. Go ahead and send me those sources, if you want, although I believe there is no need to do so, because I believe your contributions are completely in order and above reproach. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 16:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270877 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 270876 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.250466420E09 +++$+++ The ArbCom mentor]\/adviser process is working well, from my point of view, and over time I have received  honest and timely advice from my advisers. Regarding your article, I have given my opinion at GAR and on the article talk page (where I understood  Geometry guy to say comments should go), which I am  allowed to do. You are free to ignore my comments, or to argue against them on the article talk page. It is unclear what you are expecting of me now. I never indicated any interest in  rewriting the article or in reviewing it for a second GAN. Perhaps those who offered to review your article, should you renominate it, will be interested in your materials. I agree the article would emerge improved from a renomination should Philcha or Malleus do the review. If you want to refuse to renominate the article, then that is up to you.  I do ask that you stop repeatedly  posting disparaging remarks about me and my mentoring\/advising process on my talk page. Regarding, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::The ArbCom mentor]/adviser process is working well, from my point of view, and over time I have received  honest and timely advice from my advisers. Regarding your article, I have given my opinion at GAR and on the article talk page (where I understood  Geometry guy to say comments should go), which I am  allowed to do. You are free to ignore my comments, or to argue against them on the article talk page. It is unclear what you are expecting of me now. I never indicated any interest in  rewriting the article or in reviewing it for a second GAN. Perhaps those who offered to review your article, should you renominate it, will be interested in your materials. I agree the article would emerge improved from a renomination should Philcha or Malleus do the review. If you want to refuse to renominate the article, then that is up to you.  I do ask that you stop repeatedly  posting disparaging remarks about me and my mentoring/advising process on my talk page. Regarding, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270878 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 270873 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.250466780E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I think it's time to put this incident behind you - as I've noticed to-day, you have some new interests that I hope will give you more enjoyment.-- +++$+++ ::::Mattisse, I think it's time to put this incident behind you - as I've noticed to-day, you have some new interests that I hope will give you more enjoyment.--[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 16:53, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270879 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 270873 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.250466900E09 +++$+++ PS I think that applies to ''everyone'' else too. -- +++$+++ ::::PS I think that applies to ''everyone'' else too. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 16:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270880 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 270879 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.250467080E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I have had new interests all along and would prefer to have this matter dropped.  &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Thanks! I have had new interests all along and would prefer to have this matter dropped.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:58, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270881 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.250473380E09 +++$+++ You have expressed interest in leaving this behind. I think it would help right now. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMoni3&diff=308335685&oldid=308335512 Please read].  +++$+++ * You have expressed interest in leaving this behind. I think it would help right now. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMoni3&diff=308335685&oldid=308335512 Please read]. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 18:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270882 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 270870 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.250473800E09 +++$+++ I have left it behind. I have not engaged further in the matter.  This is not something I am thinking about anymore and have moved on to other things.  So I would appreciate your dropping the matter also. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ * I have left it behind. I have not engaged further in the matter.  This is not something I am thinking about anymore and have moved on to other things.  So I would appreciate your dropping the matter also. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:50, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

176217 +++$+++ Mailer diablo +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-15 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.226753460E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> Thank you for your contributions! - ''Cheers'',  +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> Thank you for your contributions! - ''Cheers'', [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 04:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
176218 +++$+++ A bit iffy +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176217 +++$+++ 176217 +++$+++ 2008-11-15 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.226772840E09 +++$+++ Excellent, interesting new article.-- +++$+++ :Excellent, interesting new article.--[[User:A bit iffy|A bit iffy]] ([[User talk:A bit iffy|talk]]) 10:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
176219 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176217 +++$+++ 176218 +++$+++ 2008-11-15 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.226782260E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I came across the term in a book recently and was surprised that we didn't have an article on it, though we did have several links in articles. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::Thanks! I came across the term in a book recently and was surprised that we didn't have an article on it, though we did have several links in articles. &mdash; [[User:BillC|BillC]]  <sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 12:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
176220 +++$+++ A bit iffy +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176217 +++$+++ 176219 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.226871420E09 +++$+++ Yes, I also came across it recently, but I can't remember where - possibly it was in Ben Goldacre's book Bad Science.-- +++$+++ :::Yes, I also came across it recently, but I can't remember where - possibly it was in Ben Goldacre's book Bad Science.--[[User:A bit iffy|A bit iffy]] ([[User talk:A bit iffy|talk]]) 13:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
176221 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176217 +++$+++ 176220 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.226871840E09 +++$+++ I don't remember it being there, though I'll check my copy. I read about it in [[Edzard Ernst|Ernst]]'s and [[Simon Singh|Singh]]'s ''Trick or Treatment''. It would have helped if I had had my copy while I was writing this... but I had lent it to someone... &mdash;  +++$+++ ::::I don't remember it being there, though I'll check my copy. I read about it in [[Edzard Ernst|Ernst]]'s and [[Simon Singh|Singh]]'s ''Trick or Treatment''. It would have helped if I had had my copy while I was writing this... but I had lent it to someone... &mdash; [[User:BillC|BillC]]  <sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 13:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
176222 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176217 +++$+++ 176220 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.226982360E09 +++$+++ After having now checked, it is in fact mentioned in both. Still, we have our own little article now. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::::After having now checked, it is in fact mentioned in both. Still, we have our own little article now. &mdash; [[User:BillC|BillC]]  <sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 20:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

8733 +++$+++ Frédérick Duhautpas +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-24 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.195891800E09 +++$+++ Original research, the use of parallel fifths in heavy metal? Come on, this claim is easily verifiable empirically\u2026 I didn\u2019t thought it was necessary to prove it as I thought it was obvious. But ok I can provide countless musical examples of HM using them. I will provide some. +++$+++ Original research, the use of parallel fifths in heavy metal? Come on, this claim is easily verifiable empirically… I didn’t thought it was necessary to prove it as I thought it was obvious. But ok I can provide countless musical examples of HM using them. I will provide some.[[User:Frédérick Duhautpas|Frédérick Duhautpas]] ([[User talk:Frédérick Duhautpas|talk]]) 00:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
8734 +++$+++ Frédérick Duhautpas +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8733 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.196011200E09 +++$+++ PS: at any rate, your French is wonderful! I wish I could speak English as well as that. +++$+++ ::PS: at any rate, your French is wonderful! I wish I could speak English as well as that.[[User:Frédérick Duhautpas|Frédérick Duhautpas]] ([[User talk:Frédérick Duhautpas|talk]]) 09:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

533022 +++$+++ Roffel +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-03 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.199401320E09 +++$+++ I saw you deleted the Paulo Bellinati page. I disagree with that. Bellinati is an important guitarist and composer. A Google search for \"Paulo Bellinati\" (with quotes) gives 69000 entries and the German and Portuguese wikipedias have Bellinati entries too. +++$+++ I saw you deleted the Paulo Bellinati page. I disagree with that. Bellinati is an important guitarist and composer. A Google search for "Paulo Bellinati" (with quotes) gives 69000 entries and the German and Portuguese wikipedias have Bellinati entries too.[[User:Roffel|Roffel]] ([[User talk:Roffel|talk]]) 15:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
533023 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533022 +++$+++ 533022 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.199406480E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, restored. But I would aprpeciate if you could expant the article. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Fair enough, restored. But I would aprpeciate if you could expant the article. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

263600 +++$+++ Trampikey +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-02 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.151887380E09 +++$+++ [[User:AnemoneProjectors]] is a sock puppet for the user (I think) you banned - Sweetie Petie. Is this allowed? Just thought I'd let you know incase it wasn't... '''[[User:Trampikey|Trampik]]<font color=\"green\">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]<\/font> +++$+++ [[User:AnemoneProjectors]] is a sock puppet for the user (I think) you banned - Sweetie Petie. Is this allowed? Just thought I'd let you know incase it wasn't... '''[[User:Trampikey|Trampik]]<font color="green">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User:Trampikey|y]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Trampikey|talk to me]])</sup><sup>([[Special:Contributions/Trampikey|contribs]])</sup> 17:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
263601 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263600 +++$+++ 263600 +++$+++ 2006-07-02 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.151895420E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but it's all been sorted. I didn't ban Sweetie Petie. Just treat AnemoneProjectors as any other good, genuine user.  +++$+++ :Thanks, but it's all been sorted. I didn't ban Sweetie Petie. Just treat AnemoneProjectors as any other good, genuine user. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:57, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

8739 +++$+++ Alatari +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-11 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.200085440E09 +++$+++ She describes her own music as [[Southern Soul]] on her [http:\/\/profile.myspace.com\/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=13263180 myspace page].  Is that enough to classify her genre on her Wiki page as [[Southern Soul]]?  It is hard to classify IMO, it sounds country, soul, gospel and alternative at different listening moments within the same song.  Elements of all involved.   +++$+++ She describes her own music as [[Southern Soul]] on her [http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=13263180 myspace page].  Is that enough to classify her genre on her Wiki page as [[Southern Soul]]?  It is hard to classify IMO, it sounds country, soul, gospel and alternative at different listening moments within the same song.  Elements of all involved.  [[User:Alatari|Alatari]] ([[User talk:Alatari|talk]]) 13:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
8740 +++$+++ Alatari +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8739 +++$+++ 8739 +++$+++ 2008-01-12 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.200168360E09 +++$+++ You had worked on other music articles leading me to believe you would have a serious opinion or sources at the ready.   +++$+++ :You had worked on other music articles leading me to believe you would have a serious opinion or sources at the ready.  [[User:Alatari|Alatari]] ([[User talk:Alatari|talk]]) 12:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

462930 +++$+++ Magiko +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 462930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-11 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.263268140E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ Thank you. [[User:Magiko|Magiko]] ([[User talk:Magiko|talk]]) 19:49, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
462931 +++$+++ Magiko +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 462930 +++$+++ 462930 +++$+++ 2010-01-11 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.263270120E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for your understanding and help. The Observer article is indeed from the Hastings Observer from 11.12.09 and the review was written by critic Rob Alderson on 18.12.2009 (same Observer) as you mentioned. I have added also some reviews (below) from German newspapers and magazines reviewing my music on my composition and performances with Frieder Noegge on our program entitled: Der 'Satierkreis'. Please let me know if you need more materials (although you can find more on my official website as well). Thanks a lot again for all your help. It is much appreciated.  +++$+++ :Thank you very much for your understanding and help. The Observer article is indeed from the Hastings Observer from 11.12.09 and the review was written by critic Rob Alderson on 18.12.2009 (same Observer) as you mentioned. I have added also some reviews (below) from German newspapers and magazines reviewing my music on my composition and performances with Frieder Noegge on our program entitled: Der 'Satierkreis'. Please let me know if you need more materials (although you can find more on my official website as well). Thanks a lot again for all your help. It is much appreciated. [[User:Magiko|Magiko]] ([[User talk:Magiko|talk]]) 20:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

270885 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-16 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.250437980E09 +++$+++ PS Your original message about this said, \"I am very interested in coral\". If you want to work on coral-related articles, it might be good to drill down from [[Cnidaria]], which provides basic info and refs about corals. Or you could approach the subject via reef ecosystems, which would give you the opportunity to find a wider range of related subjects to work on, e.g. ecosystems, conservation, economic aspects, and all the types of organism that coral reefs support. -- +++$+++ PS Your original message about this said, "I am very interested in coral". If you want to work on coral-related articles, it might be good to drill down from [[Cnidaria]], which provides basic info and refs about corals. Or you could approach the subject via reef ecosystems, which would give you the opportunity to find a wider range of related subjects to work on, e.g. ecosystems, conservation, economic aspects, and all the types of organism that coral reefs support. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 08:53, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270886 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270885 +++$+++ 270885 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.250449740E09 +++$+++ I'm not looking for a GA or anything. I'm just not interested in that. I like starting little articles that others eventually expand (and also it was a red link that I came across). This one is interesting because scientists, being focused now on the critical importance of coral reefs, are looking into what is destroying them and discovering how much they do not know. These now obscure topics (specific agents that infect and kill coral) are just now being detected and will become important in the future. I don't have your thoroughness. I am looking for a simple little article that explains a few points. I can't read lengthy, detailed articles, never mind writing them! (I copy edit long ones under duress, the ''Fertilisation of Orchids'' being the pleasurable exception).  ''[[Halofolliculina corallasia]]'' only has to be over 1500 characters for a DYK and make some clear, understandable statements. My attention span is fractured lately. I can learn the coral and coral reef vocabulary slowly by dipping my toe into small, circumscribed articles. I am considering books on coral to acquire. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :I'm not looking for a GA or anything. I'm just not interested in that. I like starting little articles that others eventually expand (and also it was a red link that I came across). This one is interesting because scientists, being focused now on the critical importance of coral reefs, are looking into what is destroying them and discovering how much they do not know. These now obscure topics (specific agents that infect and kill coral) are just now being detected and will become important in the future. I don't have your thoroughness. I am looking for a simple little article that explains a few points. I can't read lengthy, detailed articles, never mind writing them! (I copy edit long ones under duress, the ''Fertilisation of Orchids'' being the pleasurable exception).  ''[[Halofolliculina corallasia]]'' only has to be over 1500 characters for a DYK and make some clear, understandable statements. My attention span is fractured lately. I can learn the coral and coral reef vocabulary slowly by dipping my toe into small, circumscribed articles. I am considering books on coral to acquire. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:09, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270887 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270885 +++$+++ 270886 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.250466600E09 +++$+++ Now it's your turn - let me know when you've thought of a DYK hook. -- +++$+++ ::Now it's your turn - let me know when you've thought of a DYK hook. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 16:50, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270888 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270885 +++$+++ 270887 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.250517660E09 +++$+++ Meanwhile I'll rationalise the structure of both articles. -- +++$+++ :::Meanwhile I'll rationalise the structure of both articles. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 07:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
270889 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270885 +++$+++ 270888 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 09:36:00 +++$+++ 1.250526960E09 +++$+++ Re-structure done, I think it makes it clear that the articles have a different focus. -- +++$+++ ::::Re-structure done, I think it makes it clear that the articles have a different focus. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 09:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
270890 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270885 +++$+++ 270889 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.250542260E09 +++$+++ I did not put the merge banner on [[Skeletal Eroding Band]] [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Skeletal_Eroding_Band&diff=308373905&oldid=308373604]. Wetman did. So I don't think I should unilaterally remove it. I did comment on the discussion page. Also, now there are hook problems. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::::I did not put the merge banner on [[Skeletal Eroding Band]] [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Skeletal_Eroding_Band&diff=308373905&oldid=308373604]. Wetman did. So I don't think I should unilaterally remove it. I did comment on the discussion page. Also, now there are hook problems. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

8743 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-21 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.200986760E09 +++$+++ Your insertion of the material failed to take into account whether or not it was inseted well and was well-written. Inserting \"roots rock\" into the first sentence and into the musical style was forced and ill-written. Additionally, there's no reason to put it in the first sentence, which is supposed to be as general as possible. If it were to be more specific, there are other genres that would be selected first (alt-rock, alt-country, and so forth.) As [[Wilco]] is a Featured Article and is supposed to represent the best of Wikipedia, just shoving in unformated references is not a good idea. I suggest discussing adding such material with the article's primary editor, [[User:Teemu08]].  +++$+++ Your insertion of the material failed to take into account whether or not it was inseted well and was well-written. Inserting "roots rock" into the first sentence and into the musical style was forced and ill-written. Additionally, there's no reason to put it in the first sentence, which is supposed to be as general as possible. If it were to be more specific, there are other genres that would be selected first (alt-rock, alt-country, and so forth.) As [[Wilco]] is a Featured Article and is supposed to represent the best of Wikipedia, just shoving in unformated references is not a good idea. I suggest discussing adding such material with the article's primary editor, [[User:Teemu08]]. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 23:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
8744 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8743 +++$+++ 8743 +++$+++ 2008-01-23 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.201157940E09 +++$+++ I'm not saying that Teemu08 controls the article. I'm saying he's worked on it a lot and is quite the expert on Wilco, so it would be prudent to seek his opinion.  +++$+++ :I'm not saying that Teemu08 controls the article. I'm saying he's worked on it a lot and is quite the expert on Wilco, so it would be prudent to seek his opinion. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 22:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

533034 +++$+++ Refsworldlee +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-24 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.201206300E09 +++$+++ I would like to re-create this article, and would like your assessment of whether or not this is now advisable. Thanks.  +++$+++ I would like to re-create this article, and would like your assessment of whether or not this is now advisable. Thanks. [[User:Refsworldlee|'''Ref''']] <sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(do)</small>]] 12:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
533035 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533034 +++$+++ 533034 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.201212600E09 +++$+++ Hello. The article was deleted in prod process, the reason was probably because there was basically one sentence in whole article. By all means, you are welcome to re-create the article, I only suggest you start from beginning because there isn't much useful content in the deleted version. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hello. The article was deleted in prod process, the reason was probably because there was basically one sentence in whole article. By all means, you are welcome to re-create the article, I only suggest you start from beginning because there isn't much useful content in the deleted version. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
533036 +++$+++ Refsworldlee +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533034 +++$+++ 533035 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.201237320E09 +++$+++ Ah, yes, I found it - when the prod said \"per [[WP:BIO]]\", I assumed there were serious notability issues, whereas Google alone turns up some decent media discussion and blog interest, which is why I said he is talked about at the moment - there's quite an air of expectation over ''August'' - let's hope it's not all hype. I prefer to start from scratch anyway, so not to worry about the original. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Ah, yes, I found it - when the prod said "per [[WP:BIO]]", I assumed there were serious notability issues, whereas Google alone turns up some decent media discussion and blog interest, which is why I said he is talked about at the moment - there's quite an air of expectation over ''August'' - let's hope it's not all hype. I prefer to start from scratch anyway, so not to worry about the original. Thanks. [[User:Refsworldlee|'''Ref''']] <sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(do)</small>]] 21:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
533037 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533034 +++$+++ 533034 +++$+++ 2008-01-25 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.201282320E09 +++$+++ Hi. The reason was ''self promotion of unknown subject, use as model resume, no unusual accomplishments (as yet)'' when it was deleted for the first time. If you can address this issue, you are welcome to do so. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The reason was ''self promotion of unknown subject, use as model resume, no unusual accomplishments (as yet)'' when it was deleted for the first time. If you can address this issue, you are welcome to do so. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

8747 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-09 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.202611800E09 +++$+++ The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Coordinators\/February 2008|'''sign up here''']] by February 14!  +++$+++ The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/February 2008|'''sign up here''']] by February 14! [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill]] 18:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
8748 +++$+++ Roger Davies +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8747 +++$+++ 8747 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.203397740E09 +++$+++ The February 2008 [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] election has begun.  We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates.  Please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Coordinators\/February 2008|vote here]] by February 28. -- +++$+++ :The February 2008 [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] election has begun.  We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates.  Please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/February 2008|vote here]] by February 28. --[[User:Roger Davies|<font color="maroon">'''R<small>OGER</small>&nbsp;D<small>AVIES'''</small></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 21:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

394674 +++$+++ Tpbradbury +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-09 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.307681940E09 +++$+++ Hello I have actually been editing the machine translation, i'd suggest you reread the instructions you point to regarding machine translation  +++$+++ Hello I have actually been editing the machine translation, i'd suggest you reread the instructions you point to regarding machine translation [[User:Tpbradbury|Tom B]] ([[User talk:Tpbradbury|talk]]) 21:59, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
394675 +++$+++ Tpbradbury +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394674 +++$+++ 394674 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.307683560E09 +++$+++ hi, yes it does mean translating to sensible english but you also have to fix headings which is what i'm in the middle of, we can hardly do everything instantly and simultaneously! the problem with putting it in userspace is that it is much, much harder to enable people to collaborate, as you know this is one of our core principles. are you working on any translations at the moment?  +++$+++ :hi, yes it does mean translating to sensible english but you also have to fix headings which is what i'm in the middle of, we can hardly do everything instantly and simultaneously! the problem with putting it in userspace is that it is much, much harder to enable people to collaborate, as you know this is one of our core principles. are you working on any translations at the moment? [[User:Tpbradbury|Tom B]] ([[User talk:Tpbradbury|talk]]) 22:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

270894 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-17 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.250558820E09 +++$+++ Glad you like the latest hook idea. [[User:Long Shrift|Long Shrift]] did the real work, I just buffed it up a bit. We should thank (?)him if it runs. -- +++$+++ Glad you like the latest hook idea. [[User:Long Shrift|Long Shrift]] did the real work, I just buffed it up a bit. We should thank (?)him if it runs. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 18:27, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
270895 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270894 +++$+++ 270894 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.250560260E09 +++$+++ Re \"\"However, the relationship between the presence of ciliates and coral mortality ...\", my Talk page - I'm losing my sense of direction. -- +++$+++ :Re ""However, the relationship between the presence of ciliates and coral mortality ...", my Talk page - I'm losing my sense of direction. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 18:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

602595 +++$+++ Stumps +++$+++ Lord Hawk +++$+++ 602595 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-31 08:13:00 +++$+++ 1.149088380E09 +++$+++ Yes, in accordance with [[WP:CONTEXT]] we generally don't link just any date in an article, and never isolated months like 'May' or day names like 'Wednesday'.  I've made a start at reverting your date link changes, but you certainly were busy!!  I don't think I'll get through them all.  +++$+++ Yes, in accordance with [[WP:CONTEXT]] we generally don't link just any date in an article, and never isolated months like 'May' or day names like 'Wednesday'.  I've made a start at reverting your date link changes, but you certainly were busy!!  I don't think I'll get through them all. [[User:Stumps|Stumps]] 08:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
602596 +++$+++ Stumps +++$+++ Lord Hawk +++$+++ 602595 +++$+++ 602595 +++$+++ 2006-06-06 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.149627360E09 +++$+++ Hi ... I see you are adding more wikilinks for years in some articles ... please read the above comments carefully and also the relevant pages in the style manual ... [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Partial_dates|such as this one]].  Thanks  +++$+++ :Hi ... I see you are adding more wikilinks for years in some articles ... please read the above comments carefully and also the relevant pages in the style manual ... [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Partial_dates|such as this one]].  Thanks [[User:Stumps|Stumps]] 13:56, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

270896 +++$+++ Mav +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270896 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-16 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.250476020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your edits! :) -- +++$+++ Thanks for your edits! :) --[[User:Mav|mav]] ([[User talk:Mav|talk]]) 19:27, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
270897 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270896 +++$+++ 270896 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.250476320E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. There is a lot of good information in the reference articles that are already linked to the article, maybe all that you need. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :You're welcome. There is a lot of good information in the reference articles that are already linked to the article, maybe all that you need. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:32, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

585137 +++$+++ The Joker +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-13 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.205393820E09 +++$+++ Hi Acalamari. I have a question: en.wp has a list of featured articles that doesn't exist in other languages? I would like to translate featured articles from here that doesn't exist at pt.wp. Greets,  +++$+++ Hi Acalamari. I have a question: en.wp has a list of featured articles that doesn't exist in other languages? I would like to translate featured articles from here that doesn't exist at pt.wp. Greets, [[User:The Joker|Slade]] ([[meta:User:Slade|The]][[User talk:The Joker|Joker]]) 00:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
585138 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585137 +++$+++ 585137 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.205397600E09 +++$+++ I'm not totally sure what you mean. Are you asking for a list of all featured articles on the English Wikipedia?  +++$+++ :I'm not totally sure what you mean. Are you asking for a list of all featured articles on the English Wikipedia? [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 01:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
585139 +++$+++ The Joker +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585137 +++$+++ 585138 +++$+++ 2008-03-15 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.205569320E09 +++$+++ I mean a list of fetaured articles on English Wikipedia that doesn't have a counterpart at Portuguese Wikipedia. Greets,  +++$+++ ::I mean a list of fetaured articles on English Wikipedia that doesn't have a counterpart at Portuguese Wikipedia. Greets, [[User:The Joker|Slade]] ([[meta:User:Slade|The]][[User talk:The Joker|Joker]]) 01:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
585140 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585137 +++$+++ 585139 +++$+++ 2008-03-15 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.205569920E09 +++$+++ I'm not very familiar with the featured article process, to be honest. I think somebody like [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] or [[User:SandyGeorgia|SandyGeorgia]] might be better to ask, as they're more involved with featured articles.  +++$+++ :::I'm not very familiar with the featured article process, to be honest. I think somebody like [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] or [[User:SandyGeorgia|SandyGeorgia]] might be better to ask, as they're more involved with featured articles. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 01:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
585141 +++$+++ The Joker +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585137 +++$+++ 585140 +++$+++ 2008-03-15 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.205620980E09 +++$+++ I'll ask ;)  +++$+++ ::::I'll ask ;) [[User:The Joker|Slade]] ([[meta:User:Slade|The]][[User talk:The Joker|Joker]]) 15:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
585142 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585137 +++$+++ 585141 +++$+++ 2008-03-15 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.205624100E09 +++$+++ Thanks. :)  +++$+++ :::::Thanks. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

270899 +++$+++ Thatcher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270899 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-20 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.250754720E09 +++$+++ Can you answer my question about good article etiquette [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations&diff=prev&oldid=308975721]?  +++$+++ Can you answer my question about good article etiquette [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations&diff=prev&oldid=308975721]? [[User talk:Thatcher|Thatcher]] 00:52, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
270900 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270899 +++$+++ 270899 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.250755080E09 +++$+++ Have answered your question![http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AGood_article_nominations&diff=308979450&oldid=308975721] Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Have answered your question![http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AGood_article_nominations&diff=308979450&oldid=308975721] Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
270901 +++$+++ Thatcher +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270899 +++$+++ 270900 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.250755560E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but further...  +++$+++ ::Thanks, but further... [[User talk:Thatcher|Thatcher]] 01:06, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
270902 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270899 +++$+++ 270901 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.250756460E09 +++$+++ Have answered on GAN talk page (with typos).[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations&diff=prev&oldid=308982182] Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::Have answered on GAN talk page (with typos).[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations&diff=prev&oldid=308982182] Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:21, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

270903 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-22 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.251007500E09 +++$+++ I'm up to the death of Stalin.  I know I'll have to go back and trim, but almost any article on a world leader is huge.  Now comes the hard part, all the stuff about him in power.-- +++$+++ I'm up to the death of Stalin.  I know I'll have to go back and trim, but almost any article on a world leader is huge.  Now comes the hard part, all the stuff about him in power.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 23:05, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
270904 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270903 +++$+++ 270903 +++$+++ 2009-08-22 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.251010680E09 +++$+++ Maybe some of it can be spun off into sub articles. Too much detail becomes unwieldy and the overall picture is lost in the subplots that don't have a large impact on the outcome. For example, it is very complex after Stalin died&mdash;how  Khrushchev consolidated his power. But should all the moves be in this article?  &mdash; +++$+++ :Maybe some of it can be spun off into sub articles. Too much detail becomes unwieldy and the overall picture is lost in the subplots that don't have a large impact on the outcome. For example, it is very complex after Stalin died&mdash;how  Khrushchev consolidated his power. But should all the moves be in this article?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
270905 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270903 +++$+++ 270903 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.251010800E09 +++$+++ I'll concentrate on doing it lightly, and if necessary spin it off into at least short articles.-- +++$+++ :I'll concentrate on doing it lightly, and if necessary spin it off into at least short articles.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

8761 +++$+++ Ward3001 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-14 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.210761960E09 +++$+++ Although I appreciate your attempts at cleaning up the article, I think you are making too many sweeping, '''unilateral''' conclusions about what should and should not be in the article. As just one example (which I have restored), the info on Erdos-Bacon number has been discussed on Talk with no consensus to remove it. And bear in mind that your comment \"''appears to be nonsense??''\" is your opinion and does not carry enough weight to overturn consensus. You might want to take a look at the talk page before slashing more of the article out. There may be other of your removals that I will restore when I have more time, but for the time being, let me make a polite request that you slow down and consider discussing some of your concerns on the talk page before bulldozing your way through the article any more. Thank you.  +++$+++ Although I appreciate your attempts at cleaning up the article, I think you are making too many sweeping, '''unilateral''' conclusions about what should and should not be in the article. As just one example (which I have restored), the info on Erdos-Bacon number has been discussed on Talk with no consensus to remove it. And bear in mind that your comment "''appears to be nonsense??''" is your opinion and does not carry enough weight to overturn consensus. You might want to take a look at the talk page before slashing more of the article out. There may be other of your removals that I will restore when I have more time, but for the time being, let me make a polite request that you slow down and consider discussing some of your concerns on the talk page before bulldozing your way through the article any more. Thank you. [[User:Ward3001|Ward3001]] ([[User talk:Ward3001|talk]]) 03:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
8762 +++$+++ Ward3001 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8761 +++$+++ 8761 +++$+++ 2008-05-14 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.210763040E09 +++$+++ \"Be bold\" is fine. Just don't forget a more fundamental Wikipedia policy: [[WP:CON|consensus]]. Sometimes it's better to discuss your \"bold\" ideas on talk before making decisions on your own to make major changes that might be controversial.  +++$+++ :"Be bold" is fine. Just don't forget a more fundamental Wikipedia policy: [[WP:CON|consensus]]. Sometimes it's better to discuss your "bold" ideas on talk before making decisions on your own to make major changes that might be controversial. [[User:Ward3001|Ward3001]] ([[User talk:Ward3001|talk]]) 04:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

270906 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-23 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.251018000E09 +++$+++ An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Whitepox disease.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion\/2009 August 23#File:Whitepox disease.jpg|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Whitepox disease.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 August 23#File:Whitepox disease.jpg|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|306]]''</sup> 02:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
270907 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270906 +++$+++ 270906 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.251018780E09 +++$+++ See: \"White pox disease is characterized by white circular lesions on the surface of infected colonies (Photo: Dr. A. Bruckner, NOAA)\"[http:\/\/www8.nos.noaa.gov\/coris_glossary\/index.aspx?letter=w white pox disease] A. Bruckner is an employee of NOAA. It says so right on the photo. &mdash; +++$+++ * See: "White pox disease is characterized by white circular lesions on the surface of infected colonies (Photo: Dr. A. Bruckner, NOAA)"[http://www8.nos.noaa.gov/coris_glossary/index.aspx?letter=w white pox disease] A. Bruckner is an employee of NOAA. It says so right on the photo. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
270908 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270906 +++$+++ 270907 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.251018960E09 +++$+++ Ah, thanks.  Okay, removing.  Bear in mind that the photograph that provides his affiliation is hosted on a different page, but not on the source for the image in question.  In future you can avoid this type of confusion by providing both links as sources with your upload. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ **Ah, thanks.  Okay, removing.  Bear in mind that the photograph that provides his affiliation is hosted on a different page, but not on the source for the image in question.  In future you can avoid this type of confusion by providing both links as sources with your upload. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|306]]''</sup> 02:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

8763 +++$+++ Ward3001 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-14 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.210762560E09 +++$+++ I personally don't see the need to repeat what the reader can find simply by clicking the link to [[Erd\u0151s\u2013Bacon number]], and I suspect someone will remove the \"gloss\" later, but this is not a point that I consider important enough to revert.  +++$+++ I personally don't see the need to repeat what the reader can find simply by clicking the link to [[Erdős–Bacon number]], and I suspect someone will remove the "gloss" later, but this is not a point that I consider important enough to revert. [[User:Ward3001|Ward3001]] ([[User talk:Ward3001|talk]]) 03:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
8764 +++$+++ Ward3001 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8763 +++$+++ 8763 +++$+++ 2008-05-14 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.210803240E09 +++$+++ \"''could there be cases where the article is licensed to another location, in such a way that the Wikilinks don't work?''\": Not quite sure I understand your question. A wikilink will always work if it's properly formatted and a target article exists. Maybe you mean an inline external link, such as [http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0000204 this one]. Those will always work unless the URL changes.  +++$+++ :"''could there be cases where the article is licensed to another location, in such a way that the Wikilinks don't work?''": Not quite sure I understand your question. A wikilink will always work if it's properly formatted and a target article exists. Maybe you mean an inline external link, such as [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000204 this one]. Those will always work unless the URL changes. [[User:Ward3001|Ward3001]] ([[User talk:Ward3001|talk]]) 15:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
8765 +++$+++ Ward3001 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8763 +++$+++ 8764 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.211092800E09 +++$+++ \"''When Wikipedia articles are licensed to other websites (under the GFDL), I was wondering if the licensees always import the wikitext HTML markup, including the Wikilinks. Could it be that in some cases, a Wikipedia article appears just as \"text\", with inoperative Wikilinks? If this were the case, then it would help to justify adding glosses''\": Wikipedia's free license allows any website to use it's material. It isn't licensed to any specific websites. And Wikipedia has no responsibilities to other websites that use its materials. So if they copy wikilinks that don't work on their sites, that's their problem, not Wikipedia's.  +++$+++ ::"''When Wikipedia articles are licensed to other websites (under the GFDL), I was wondering if the licensees always import the wikitext HTML markup, including the Wikilinks. Could it be that in some cases, a Wikipedia article appears just as "text", with inoperative Wikilinks? If this were the case, then it would help to justify adding glosses''": Wikipedia's free license allows any website to use it's material. It isn't licensed to any specific websites. And Wikipedia has no responsibilities to other websites that use its materials. So if they copy wikilinks that don't work on their sites, that's their problem, not Wikipedia's. [[User:Ward3001|Ward3001]] ([[User talk:Ward3001|talk]]) 23:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

533053 +++$+++ 24.5.78.60 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-09 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.202603400E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/24.5.78.60|24.5.78.60]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/24.5.78.60|24.5.78.60]] ([[User talk:24.5.78.60|talk]]) 16:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
533054 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533053 +++$+++ 533053 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.202608740E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article basically had no content apart from two sentences. In two sentences, it is very hard to establish notability of the subject, add references and stick to the wiki-style. I guess there will be no problems in keeping the article if you rewrite it with some more content. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article basically had no content apart from two sentences. In two sentences, it is very hard to establish notability of the subject, add references and stick to the wiki-style. I guess there will be no problems in keeping the article if you rewrite it with some more content. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
533055 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533053 +++$+++ 533053 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.202883300E09 +++$+++ Hello. There's no problem with the idea of the article itself. Of course, Wikipedia tends to be objective and treat various aspects and viewpoints. However, the article was only a sketch and contained no references. When dealing with a possibly controversial topic, this should be avoided. Have a look at [[WP:NOR]] as well, you should always provide sources for your claims. So I invite you to start the article from the beginning instead of restoring the previous versin. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hello. There's no problem with the idea of the article itself. Of course, Wikipedia tends to be objective and treat various aspects and viewpoints. However, the article was only a sketch and contained no references. When dealing with a possibly controversial topic, this should be avoided. Have a look at [[WP:NOR]] as well, you should always provide sources for your claims. So I invite you to start the article from the beginning instead of restoring the previous versin. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
533056 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533053 +++$+++ 533053 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.202958900E09 +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for the compliments :-) The problem with the article is that it does not assert the notability well enough and notability is the criteria a band deserves its article. You can find a good reading for the beginning at [[WP:MUSIC]], the criteria are listed there. Two study albums is good but you only provide one website apart from the official one as the reference. For now, I will copy the article to your userpage so you can work on it and repost it when you think it's ready. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Thanks for the compliments :-) The problem with the article is that it does not assert the notability well enough and notability is the criteria a band deserves its article. You can find a good reading for the beginning at [[WP:MUSIC]], the criteria are listed there. Two study albums is good but you only provide one website apart from the official one as the reference. For now, I will copy the article to your userpage so you can work on it and repost it when you think it's ready. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

8768 +++$+++ Steve Carlson +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8768 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-10 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.215690000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your edits to [[Distortion (guitar)]] - they're great!   +++$+++ Thanks for your edits to [[Distortion (guitar)]] - they're great!  [[User:Steve_carlson|Steve Carlson]]<sup>[[User talk:Steve carlson|Talk]]</sup> 04:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
8769 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8768 +++$+++ 8768 +++$+++ 2008-07-10 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.215722880E09 +++$+++ Hi Steve, Thank you. I try to work on the lede section of any article I edit. Ideally, the lede should give the basic information AND interest the reader. I find that some lede sections are too \"dry\" and bare! I have been going through a lot of guitar and music-related articles to clean them up. Guitar and music-related articles are close to a lot of people's hearts, so there tends to be a lot of POV\/ OR\/ praise, and the words \"legendary\", \"classic\", and \"greatest\" get thrown around way too much. As well, with guitar topics, there is a lot of \"a guy at the guitar store told me that...\" type legends\/rumours\/myths that circulate, to the point that people believe them (e.g., on the [[Jaco Pastorious]] page, we have had to remove claims that he put chicken grease on the neck of his bass). One issue I wanted to raise with you is how to deal with the problem of duplication in the guitar\/effects topic area. There is a \"guitar effects\" article, an \"effects units\" article, a \"stompbox\" article. I think it might be good to merge them all into one BIG effects article, and have the other titles REDIRECT to the main article. +++$+++ :Hi Steve, Thank you. I try to work on the lede section of any article I edit. Ideally, the lede should give the basic information AND interest the reader. I find that some lede sections are too "dry" and bare! I have been going through a lot of guitar and music-related articles to clean them up. Guitar and music-related articles are close to a lot of people's hearts, so there tends to be a lot of POV/ OR/ praise, and the words "legendary", "classic", and "greatest" get thrown around way too much. As well, with guitar topics, there is a lot of "a guy at the guitar store told me that..." type legends/rumours/myths that circulate, to the point that people believe them (e.g., on the [[Jaco Pastorious]] page, we have had to remove claims that he put chicken grease on the neck of his bass). One issue I wanted to raise with you is how to deal with the problem of duplication in the guitar/effects topic area. There is a "guitar effects" article, an "effects units" article, a "stompbox" article. I think it might be good to merge them all into one BIG effects article, and have the other titles REDIRECT to the main article.[[User:OnBeyondZebrax|OnBeyondZebrax]] ([[User talk:OnBeyondZebrax#top|talk]]) 13:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
8770 +++$+++ Steve Carlson +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8768 +++$+++ 8769 +++$+++ 2008-07-19 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.216454940E09 +++$+++ I agree, there is really no point in there being separate articles for each, and they duplicate a lot of content.  I believe the issue has been raised on the talk page of one or more of those articles, so please chime in.  Or [[WP:BOLD|be bold]] and just do it!  I'm watching those articles too and will help straighten out the mess if you take the plunge.   +++$+++ ::I agree, there is really no point in there being separate articles for each, and they duplicate a lot of content.  I believe the issue has been raised on the talk page of one or more of those articles, so please chime in.  Or [[WP:BOLD|be bold]] and just do it!  I'm watching those articles too and will help straighten out the mess if you take the plunge.  [[User:Steve_carlson|Steve Carlson]]<sup>[[User talk:Steve carlson|Talk]]</sup> 01:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

533057 +++$+++ WandaWeigert +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-12 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.202888760E09 +++$+++ I would like to know why you deleted '''[[:Globant]]''' \xb4s page. That company is commonly known in the IT world in [[Argentina]], referred by lots of media and received different recognitions... It has been named as the top 5 leader in the south of the border and [[International Data Corporation]] has also mentioned the growth of the company as part of its 2008 trends. When writing the article, I followed the guidelines and used the articles of another companies as a model... Could you please let me know if we could restore it? if not, is there a chance to recover the source and point out how to improve it? Thanks -- +++$+++ I would like to know why you deleted '''[[:Globant]]''' ´s page. That company is commonly known in the IT world in [[Argentina]], referred by lots of media and received different recognitions... It has been named as the top 5 leader in the south of the border and [[International Data Corporation]] has also mentioned the growth of the company as part of its 2008 trends. When writing the article, I followed the guidelines and used the articles of another companies as a model... Could you please let me know if we could restore it? if not, is there a chance to recover the source and point out how to improve it? Thanks --[[User:WandaWeigert|WandaWeigert]] ([[User talk:WandaWeigert|talk]]) 23:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
533058 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533057 +++$+++ 533057 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.202958900E09 +++$+++ Hello. The article at the present state reads completely like an advertisment and can't stay like this. Things like ''Organization Culture'' don't fit into an encyclopedic article. And the prose should read more neutral (like ''Moreover, Globant has aligned its businesses specializing in different industries...'', ''Globant's growth was reflected in its revenue and headcount, which were doubled each year'' and so on need to be rewritten). Because you say the company is notable in Argentina, I am going to restore it and put to afd. This will give you a week time to improve it and hopefully there will be some comments from other editors as well. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hello. The article at the present state reads completely like an advertisment and can't stay like this. Things like ''Organization Culture'' don't fit into an encyclopedic article. And the prose should read more neutral (like ''Moreover, Globant has aligned its businesses specializing in different industries...'', ''Globant's growth was reflected in its revenue and headcount, which were doubled each year'' and so on need to be rewritten). Because you say the company is notable in Argentina, I am going to restore it and put to afd. This will give you a week time to improve it and hopefully there will be some comments from other editors as well. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

270915 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270915 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-27 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.251429360E09 +++$+++ I'd appreciate you taking a look. Thanks <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ I'd appreciate you taking a look. Thanks <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 20:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
270916 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270915 +++$+++ 270915 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.251433320E09 +++$+++ Also, who were the \"team of producers\" directors and other involved people,  and how much was Joan involved after the its creation and the  beginning? The article seems rather focused on Joan, who (although important) is not responsible for 40+ years of history. What is the focus of this article?  It seems unbalanced if it is meant to cover the \"history\" of Sesame Street.   &mdash; +++$+++ :Also, who were the "team of producers" directors and other involved people,  and how much was Joan involved after the its creation and the  beginning? The article seems rather focused on Joan, who (although important) is not responsible for 40+ years of history. What is the focus of this article?  It seems unbalanced if it is meant to cover the "history" of Sesame Street.   &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:22, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
270917 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270915 +++$+++ 270916 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.251437460E09 +++$+++ Thanks. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ ::Thanks. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 22:31, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

8772 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-12 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.215918120E09 +++$+++ Your expansion of the lead, I don't feel that it's needed, since it's a condensed copy of the celebrity section.  +++$+++ Your expansion of the lead, I don't feel that it's needed, since it's a condensed copy of the celebrity section. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 20:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
8773 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8772 +++$+++ 8772 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.215919260E09 +++$+++ Oh, and forgive my using a subheading for this additional comment, but I'm responding to you this moment through the [[Playstation 3]], which doesn't allow much editing freedom.  +++$+++ :Oh, and forgive my using a subheading for this additional comment, but I'm responding to you this moment through the [[Playstation 3]], which doesn't allow much editing freedom. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 20:21, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
8774 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8772 +++$+++ 8773 +++$+++ 2008-07-16 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.216261260E09 +++$+++ And any valid sources you can find for more supercouples would also be a great addition to this article, of course.  +++$+++ ::And any valid sources you can find for more supercouples would also be a great addition to this article, of course. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 19:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

270918 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.251448140E09 +++$+++ Suddenly I can no longer edit as I have been blocked for no reason. I do not understand what has happened. &mdash; +++$+++ Suddenly I can no longer edit as I have been blocked for no reason. I do not understand what has happened. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270919 +++$+++ Intelligentsium +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270918 +++$+++ 270918 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.251448380E09 +++$+++ According to the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&user=&page=User:Mattisse&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1 log], you have not been blocked. I don't know why you can't edit - try {{tl|adminhelp}} maybe? <i><font face=\"Decorative\"> +++$+++ :According to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&user=&page=User:Mattisse&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1 log], you have not been blocked. I don't know why you can't edit - try {{tl|adminhelp}} maybe? <i><font face="Decorative">[[User:Intelligentsium|<span style="color:DarkGreen">Intelligent</span>]]<b>[[User_talk:Intelligentsium|<span style="color:Black">sium</span>]]</b></font></i> 01:33, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

8775 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8775 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-18 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.216389360E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your work on the creation of a fan subculture section in the [[Heavy metal music]] article (It's one thing the article needed but we never got around to). However, there's two problems. One is that that citation style is inconsistent with the rest of the article. This is simple enough to fix; as you cited the Weinstein book (which is cited several times in the article already) it's as simple as copying the footnote style and putting in the proper pages numbers. More problematic is the way you wrote the section. I tried to format the refs properly myself, but found the way the section was written very reminiscent of an academic essay, which made me hestiant to redo the refs since it seemed like some synthesis was going on. I can help you if you need it to rewrite to section.  +++$+++ I appreciate your work on the creation of a fan subculture section in the [[Heavy metal music]] article (It's one thing the article needed but we never got around to). However, there's two problems. One is that that citation style is inconsistent with the rest of the article. This is simple enough to fix; as you cited the Weinstein book (which is cited several times in the article already) it's as simple as copying the footnote style and putting in the proper pages numbers. More problematic is the way you wrote the section. I tried to format the refs properly myself, but found the way the section was written very reminiscent of an academic essay, which made me hestiant to redo the refs since it seemed like some synthesis was going on. I can help you if you need it to rewrite to section. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 06:56, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
8776 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8775 +++$+++ 8775 +++$+++ 2008-07-18 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.216436520E09 +++$+++ The problem with the photos is that there are too many and they are messing up the page formatting.  +++$+++ :The problem with the photos is that there are too many and they are messing up the page formatting. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 20:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

270920 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.251448680E09 +++$+++ Why can I not edit? My block log shows no blocks. I am confused.  &mdash; +++$+++ Why can I not edit? My block log shows no blocks. I am confused.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270921 +++$+++ Mysdaao +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270920 +++$+++ 270920 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.251449040E09 +++$+++ You may have been [[Wikipedia:Autoblock|autoblocked]].  Please follow the directions at [[Template:Autoblock]].  -- +++$+++ :You may have been [[Wikipedia:Autoblock|autoblocked]].  Please follow the directions at [[Template:Autoblock]].  --[[User:Mysdaao|Mysdaao]] <sup>[[User talk:Mysdaao|talk]]</sup> 01:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
270922 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270920 +++$+++ 270921 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.251449220E09 +++$+++ Hi. If you use IRC, I'll be able to help you there, otherwise you can email me the block info. This is the \"To request unblocking\" box in the \"Additional information\" section of the block message. [[Special:Emailuser\/Prodego]].  +++$+++ ::Hi. If you use IRC, I'll be able to help you there, otherwise you can email me the block info. This is the "To request unblocking" box in the "Additional information" section of the block message. [[Special:Emailuser/Prodego]]. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 01:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

8777 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-19 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.216501800E09 +++$+++ I've noticed you're moving the images around on [[electric guitar]]. The MoS [[MOS:IMAGES|specifically says]] \"''start an article with a right-aligned lead image''\", so I've reverted your recent move of the first image down-article. There's no longer anything in the MoS which recommends not starting sections with images, and it makes it easier to locate them when editing than sifting through text for the image code, so it seems better to place them at the top of sections unless there's a specific reason not to.  +++$+++ I've noticed you're moving the images around on [[electric guitar]]. The MoS [[MOS:IMAGES|specifically says]] "''start an article with a right-aligned lead image''", so I've reverted your recent move of the first image down-article. There's no longer anything in the MoS which recommends not starting sections with images, and it makes it easier to locate them when editing than sifting through text for the image code, so it seems better to place them at the top of sections unless there's a specific reason not to. [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 14:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
8778 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8777 +++$+++ 8777 +++$+++ 2008-07-19 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.216505820E09 +++$+++ I see you reverted another image move back to below the accompanying text. Your summary was \"add to discussion\" - can you explain?  +++$+++ : I see you reverted another image move back to below the accompanying text. Your summary was "add to discussion" - can you explain? [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 15:17, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

270923 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-05 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.254775260E09 +++$+++ Please do not carry on conversations with other users on this talk page. Thank you.  Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ Please do not carry on conversations with other users on this talk page. Thank you.  Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
270924 +++$+++ GiacomoReturned +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270923 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.254793380E09 +++$+++ I have removed my comments from \"the page\" Mattisse place them, per the reasons outlined here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Bishonen&curid=14915080&diff=318095004&oldid=317991083].  +++$+++ ::I have removed my comments from "the page" Mattisse place them, per the reasons outlined here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bishonen&curid=14915080&diff=318095004&oldid=317991083]. [[User:GiacomoReturned|Giano]] ([[User talk:GiacomoReturned|talk]]) 18:43, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
270925 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270923 +++$+++ 270923 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.254796920E09 +++$+++ Ignore the provocation, Mattisse. -- +++$+++ :Ignore the provocation, Mattisse. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 19:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
270926 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270923 +++$+++ 270925 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.254798840E09 +++$+++ [[WP:DFTT|Yeah, ignore it]].  +++$+++ ::[[WP:DFTT|Yeah, ignore it]]. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 20:14, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
270927 +++$+++ GiacomoReturned +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270923 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.254799800E09 +++$+++ If it is provocation you want, then look to your charge. Either control her or admit defeat. Quite frankly, I care not which, just stop her trolling, or let he meet her inevitable wiki-end - it matters not. OK?  +++$+++ ::::If it is provocation you want, then look to your charge. Either control her or admit defeat. Quite frankly, I care not which, just stop her trolling, or let he meet her inevitable wiki-end - it matters not. OK? [[User:GiacomoReturned|Giano]] ([[User talk:GiacomoReturned|talk]]) 20:30, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

8781 +++$+++ Olberon +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8781 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-25 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.217037900E09 +++$+++ I oppose to your edit and the conclusion you made in the Scientology article. [[Talk:Scientology]], see #5 ''L. Ron Hubbard: speculative fiction writer or science fiction writer''. I made a response and give a link to information. -- +++$+++ I oppose to your edit and the conclusion you made in the Scientology article. [[Talk:Scientology]], see #5 ''L. Ron Hubbard: speculative fiction writer or science fiction writer''. I made a response and give a link to information. --[[User:Olberon|Olberon]] ([[User talk:Olberon|talk]]) 19:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
8782 +++$+++ Olberon +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8781 +++$+++ 8781 +++$+++ 2008-07-25 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.217044080E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your response. I copied it to the talkpage in the article. I also did respond to it (please keep your responses there!). -- +++$+++ :Thank you for your response. I copied it to the talkpage in the article. I also did respond to it (please keep your responses there!). --[[User:Olberon|Olberon]] ([[User talk:Olberon|talk]]) 20:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

533070 +++$+++ Jalen +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-18 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.203357180E09 +++$+++ te lahko prosim, \u010de ob\u010dasno nadzira\u0161 ta \u010dlanek. Hvala in LP,  +++$+++ te lahko prosim, če občasno nadziraš ta članek. Hvala in LP, [[User:Jalen|Jalen]] ([[User talk:Jalen|talk]]) 09:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
533071 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533070 +++$+++ 533070 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.203358200E09 +++$+++ Bom dodal na spisek nadzorov. Zgodba iz sl: se ponavlja... LP --''' +++$+++ : Bom dodal na spisek nadzorov. Zgodba iz sl: se ponavlja... LP --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

533072 +++$+++ Marcos G. Tusar +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-18 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.203364440E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone and Jalen! I would like to particpate in the talk by my knowledge of sloven\u0161\u010dina is very poor. I think that, as this is english Wikipedia it is better to talk in english.-- +++$+++ Hi Tone and Jalen! I would like to particpate in the talk by my knowledge of slovenščina is very poor. I think that, as this is english Wikipedia it is better to talk in english.--[[User:Marcos G. Tusar|Marcos G. Tusar]] ([[User talk:Marcos G. Tusar|talk]]) 11:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
533073 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533072 +++$+++ 533072 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.203364560E09 +++$+++ Sure. The translation of the above: Jalen asked me to check the article and I said I'll put it to my watchlist. Since we've discussed the topic at sl:wiki, we already know what it is about. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Sure. The translation of the above: Jalen asked me to check the article and I said I'll put it to my watchlist. Since we've discussed the topic at sl:wiki, we already know what it is about. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

394680 +++$+++ Soap +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-14 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.308049500E09 +++$+++ <b> +++$+++ <b>[[User:Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]][[User talk:Soap|<font color="057602">''Soap''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]]</b> 04:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
394681 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394680 +++$+++ 394680 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.308537900E09 +++$+++ I have deleted your article because it did not demonstrate why it was important, it had no sources or references and it also wasn't in english, this is the english wikipedia-- +++$+++ :I have deleted your article because it did not demonstrate why it was important, it had no sources or references and it also wasn't in english, this is the english wikipedia--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 19:45, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

8787 +++$+++ Skitzouk +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-30 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.222828740E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Skitzouk|Skitzo]] ([[User talk:Skitzouk|talk]]) 19:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
8788 +++$+++ Skitzouk +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8787 +++$+++ 8787 +++$+++ 2008-09-30 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.222829460E09 +++$+++ by sources you need to add external verifiable references mate, either links to a website or bibliography esq. sources ...  +++$+++ :by sources you need to add external verifiable references mate, either links to a website or bibliography esq. sources ... [[User:Skitzouk|Skitzo]] ([[User talk:Skitzouk|talk]]) 19:51, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
8789 +++$+++ Skitzouk +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8787 +++$+++ 8788 +++$+++ 2008-09-30 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.222830360E09 +++$+++ it is however policy to use your [[User:OnBeyondZebrax\/Sandbox|sandbox]] to work on articles in order to bring them up to standard before posting them in the main space.  +++$+++ ::it is however policy to use your [[User:OnBeyondZebrax/Sandbox|sandbox]] to work on articles in order to bring them up to standard before posting them in the main space. [[User:Skitzouk|Skitzo]] ([[User talk:Skitzouk|talk]]) 20:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
8790 +++$+++ Skitzouk +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8787 +++$+++ 8789 +++$+++ 2008-09-30 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.222830840E09 +++$+++ it doesn't matter how long there are there, only if they meet the standard, as i said it is better for an article like this to use your sandbox until you have it at least to stub standard, look [[special:NewPages|here]] you'd be amazed how many look like yours did and then never get touched, hence why i used prod instead of speedy delete as that gives you 5 days to improve it, others wouldn't be so generous i'm afraid.  +++$+++ :::it doesn't matter how long there are there, only if they meet the standard, as i said it is better for an article like this to use your sandbox until you have it at least to stub standard, look [[special:NewPages|here]] you'd be amazed how many look like yours did and then never get touched, hence why i used prod instead of speedy delete as that gives you 5 days to improve it, others wouldn't be so generous i'm afraid. [[User:Skitzouk|Skitzo]] ([[User talk:Skitzouk|talk]]) 20:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

533077 +++$+++  Shoessss +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-18 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.203385320E09 +++$+++ A voice from the past :-).  First, how has everything been [[User:Tone|Tone]]?  I hope everything is going well with you and yours.  Now that I buttered you up, was hoping you could look over an article and give some insight.  To be honest, the material is so far over my head I would not know where to begin.  The article in question is [[Cohen Modal Cluster Haplotype]], which is involved in a very contentious Afd as shown here [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Cohen Modal Cluster Haplotype]].  Both parties, for and against,  are looking to me to settle. Moreover, as I said, I do not even know what they are talking about, let alone contribute reasonably and rationally.  Appreciate any and all insight you may be able to shed.  In the mean time, take care. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ A voice from the past :-).  First, how has everything been [[User:Tone|Tone]]?  I hope everything is going well with you and yours.  Now that I buttered you up, was hoping you could look over an article and give some insight.  To be honest, the material is so far over my head I would not know where to begin.  The article in question is [[Cohen Modal Cluster Haplotype]], which is involved in a very contentious Afd as shown here [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cohen Modal Cluster Haplotype]].  Both parties, for and against,  are looking to me to settle. Moreover, as I said, I do not even know what they are talking about, let alone contribute reasonably and rationally.  Appreciate any and all insight you may be able to shed.  In the mean time, take care. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Shoessss|<b>Shoessss</b>]] | [[User_talk: Shoessss|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;Chat&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 17:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
533078 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533077 +++$+++ 533077 +++$+++ 2008-02-19 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.203470340E09 +++$+++ Hello. I'm doing fine... I'll have a look at the afd but probably in a day or two because I already see it's going to take some time... I am not an expert on the subject but maybe I can help anyway. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hello. I'm doing fine... I'll have a look at the afd but probably in a day or two because I already see it's going to take some time... I am not an expert on the subject but maybe I can help anyway. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
533079 +++$+++  Shoessss +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533077 +++$+++ 533078 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.203529920E09 +++$+++ Appreciate.  Have a great day.<small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::Appreciate.  Have a great day.<small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Shoessss|<b>Shoessss</b>]] | [[User_talk: Shoessss|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;Chat&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 09:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

8792 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-13 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.223918340E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to say that I thought your edits were generally excellent, though I've had another go at the opening sentence - see what you think.  The article needs a lot more work, but I'm happy to collaborate on editing further if you're interested.   +++$+++ Just wanted to say that I thought your edits were generally excellent, though I've had another go at the opening sentence - see what you think.  The article needs a lot more work, but I'm happy to collaborate on editing further if you're interested.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 10:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
8793 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8792 +++$+++ 8792 +++$+++ 2008-10-16 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.224186300E09 +++$+++ I agree with your analysis.  I think as a start the best approach would be to identify and cite reliable sources for the information set out - starting with the rock music article, and then moving on to the various genres.  But what are the most reliable sources?  I don't have many encyclopedias of rock music (I do have an old ''Rolling Stone'' \"History...\").  What do you think?  What are the best \/most objective online sources that give a fair overview?  I'll add it to my \"to do\" list, but personally I need to prioritise in other areas right now.   +++$+++ :I agree with your analysis.  I think as a start the best approach would be to identify and cite reliable sources for the information set out - starting with the rock music article, and then moving on to the various genres.  But what are the most reliable sources?  I don't have many encyclopedias of rock music (I do have an old ''Rolling Stone'' "History...").  What do you think?  What are the best /most objective online sources that give a fair overview?  I'll add it to my "to do" list, but personally I need to prioritise in other areas right now.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 12:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

533084 +++$+++ Excirial +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-23 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.203815580E09 +++$+++ Unless im making a major mistake here, this article was about a Not for profit organisation which seemed notable enough to give the origional creator at least some time to source it. Are you sure this had to be a speedy?  +++$+++ Unless im making a major mistake here, this article was about a Not for profit organisation which seemed notable enough to give the origional creator at least some time to source it. Are you sure this had to be a speedy? [[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Talk</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup> 17:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
533085 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533084 +++$+++ 533084 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.203815940E09 +++$+++ Well, it seemed pretty much as blatant advertizing to me. Written in first person and seems as copied from somewhere. Needs to be written from scratch again, IMO. I can restore it but it won't help much. --''' +++$+++ : Well, it seemed pretty much as blatant advertizing to me. Written in first person and seems as copied from somewhere. Needs to be written from scratch again, IMO. I can restore it but it won't help much. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
533086 +++$+++ Nsaa +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533084 +++$+++ 533084 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.203837780E09 +++$+++ If you don't agree, please consider deleting [[Template:Bibsys]] (created, but still not in use. Used in 25+ articles in the Norwegian Wikipedia [[:no:Spesial:Lenker_hit\/Mal:Bibsys]]).  +++$+++ :If you don't agree, please consider deleting [[Template:Bibsys]] (created, but still not in use. Used in 25+ articles in the Norwegian Wikipedia [[:no:Spesial:Lenker_hit/Mal:Bibsys]]). [[User:Nsaa|Nsaa]] ([[User talk:Nsaa|talk]]) 23:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
533087 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533084 +++$+++ 533086 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.203888240E09 +++$+++ Restored after reconsideration. However, it would be nice if you could add more than one sentence of content. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ :: Restored after reconsideration. However, it would be nice if you could add more than one sentence of content. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
533088 +++$+++ Nsaa +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533084 +++$+++ 533087 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.203921180E09 +++$+++ Thanx. Did some small changes and added a sentence.  +++$+++ :::Thanx. Did some small changes and added a sentence. [[User:Nsaa|Nsaa]] ([[User talk:Nsaa|talk]]) 22:33, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

394682 +++$+++ MikeLynch +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-20 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.308621780E09 +++$+++ Hi Jac, thought its best let you know about the draft [[User:Gespee\/Purswani]] which you had moved back. I have cleaned up the article, found some refs and added them. Thought I'd ask your opinion on it before I do a move on it. Thanks. ''' +++$+++ Hi Jac, thought its best let you know about the draft [[User:Gespee/Purswani]] which you had moved back. I have cleaned up the article, found some refs and added them. Thought I'd ask your opinion on it before I do a move on it. Thanks. '''[[User:MikeLynch|<span style="color:#000080">Lynch</span>]][[User talk:MikeLynch|<span style="color:#00BFFF">7</span>]]''' 19:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
394683 +++$+++ MikeLynch +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394682 +++$+++ 394682 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.308861060E09 +++$+++ Any comments? ''' +++$+++ :Any comments? '''[[User:MikeLynch|<span style="color:#000080">Lynch</span>]][[User talk:MikeLynch|<span style="color:#00BFFF">7</span>]]''' 13:31, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
394684 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394682 +++$+++ 394683 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.308861240E09 +++$+++ Oops, sorry. Move it if you like, it is somewhat better-- +++$+++ ::Oops, sorry. Move it if you like, it is somewhat better--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 13:34, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
394685 +++$+++ MikeLynch +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394682 +++$+++ 394684 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.308861420E09 +++$+++ Okay; Will do so, though I'm not really satisfied with the article. ''' +++$+++ :::Okay; Will do so, though I'm not really satisfied with the article. '''[[User:MikeLynch|<span style="color:#000080">Lynch</span>]][[User talk:MikeLynch|<span style="color:#00BFFF">7</span>]]''' 13:37, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
394686 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394682 +++$+++ 394685 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.308861780E09 +++$+++ I will say this much though, whatever state you leave it in, thats most likely how it will stay for a very long time, articles like that are difficult to improve, so not many people even try-- +++$+++ ::::I will say this much though, whatever state you leave it in, thats most likely how it will stay for a very long time, articles like that are difficult to improve, so not many people even try--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 13:43, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
394687 +++$+++ MikeLynch +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394682 +++$+++ 394686 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.308865560E09 +++$+++ I agree. There are not many working on caste articles, and it is very hard to find a NPOV source. MatthewVanitas is the only one whom I know is working on caste articles. ''' +++$+++ :::::I agree. There are not many working on caste articles, and it is very hard to find a NPOV source. MatthewVanitas is the only one whom I know is working on caste articles. '''[[User:MikeLynch|<span style="color:#000080">Lynch</span>]][[User talk:MikeLynch|<span style="color:#00BFFF">7</span>]]''' 14:46, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

270942 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-13 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.255489500E09 +++$+++ (moved inappropriate comment  to monitoring page [[User:Mattisse\/Monitoring#John_Carter_.26_Mattisse.27s_Mentors.]] \u2014 +++$+++ (moved inappropriate comment  to monitoring page [[User:Mattisse/Monitoring#John_Carter_.26_Mattisse.27s_Mentors.]] —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:05, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
270943 +++$+++ Unitanode +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270942 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.255489740E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, it was ''not'' an \"inappropriate comment.\" Giano has every right to be frustrated with his name being dredged up in nearly every discussion someone attempts about ''your'' behavior. And your continual removal of his posts to the monitoring page isn't helpful either. He's made it clear he doesn't want his name associated with that page.  +++$+++ ::Mattisse, it was ''not'' an "inappropriate comment." Giano has every right to be frustrated with his name being dredged up in nearly every discussion someone attempts about ''your'' behavior. And your continual removal of his posts to the monitoring page isn't helpful either. He's made it clear he doesn't want his name associated with that page. [[User:Unitanode|<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-variant:small-caps;color:#63739F">Unit</span>]][[User talk:Unitanode|<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-variant:small-caps;color:#63739F">Anode</span>]] 20:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
270944 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270942 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.255490160E09 +++$+++ I do not believe I have raised Giano's name. If he has a beef with another editor, he should take it to that editor's talk page. I have previously requested that Giano not post here, and respectfully ask that he honor that request.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::I do not believe I have raised Giano's name. If he has a beef with another editor, he should take it to that editor's talk page. I have previously requested that Giano not post here, and respectfully ask that he honor that request.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:16, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
270945 +++$+++ Unitanode +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270942 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.255491960E09 +++$+++ Are you really denying that you brought Giano and Bishonen's names into this? Seriously?  +++$+++ :::::Are you really denying that you brought Giano and Bishonen's names into this? Seriously? [[User:Unitanode|<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-variant:small-caps;color:#63739F">Unit</span>]][[User talk:Unitanode|<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-variant:small-caps;color:#63739F">Anode</span>]] 20:46, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
270946 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270942 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.255491600E09 +++$+++ And the primary reason he couldn't post on my page is that I explicitly requested it up front. As an admin, I guess he gives my requests more credit than he does those of Mattisse, who indicates that she had previously asked him to stay of her page.  +++$+++ ::::And the primary reason he couldn't post on my page is that I explicitly requested it up front. As an admin, I guess he gives my requests more credit than he does those of Mattisse, who indicates that she had previously asked him to stay of her page. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 20:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

544747 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-11 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.197431460E09 +++$+++ Hello TimVickers, I thought I'd mention that you can unprotect my user page now please. I know I could do it myself, but I felt it would be more courteous to ask you to do it, as you were the one who semi-protected it. Thanks!  +++$+++ Hello TimVickers, I thought I'd mention that you can unprotect my user page now please. I know I could do it myself, but I felt it would be more courteous to ask you to do it, as you were the one who semi-protected it. Thanks! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
544748 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544747 +++$+++ 544747 +++$+++ 2007-12-11 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.197432180E09 +++$+++ That's fine; thanks for both the initial protection, and now the unprotection. :)  +++$+++ :That's fine; thanks for both the initial protection, and now the unprotection. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

8801 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-25 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.240697700E09 +++$+++ Basically, your oldest username has an orphaned talk page, do you mind if I move it to [[User talk:OnBeyondZebrax\/Archive]]?-- +++$+++ Basically, your oldest username has an orphaned talk page, do you mind if I move it to [[User talk:OnBeyondZebrax/Archive]]?--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]][[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 15:15, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
8802 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8801 +++$+++ 8801 +++$+++ 2009-04-25 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.240710840E09 +++$+++ Done, thanks-- +++$+++ :Done, thanks--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]][[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 18:54, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

8803 +++$+++ Commander Zulu +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-15 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.242414360E09 +++$+++ I'm not really sure it's appropriate to go and arbitrarily change the pop culture referencing rules in the WP:GUNS, especially without discussion and when you're not a prolific or \"recognised\" editor on the subject. There's a difference between \"Being Bold\" and \"Completely Ignoring Or Deciding You Know Better Than The Project Task Force\". I'm not saying I disagree with your changes, but I don't think it's appropriate for you to make them without reference to the people who put a lot of time and effort into the articles and the relevant task force(s).  +++$+++ I'm not really sure it's appropriate to go and arbitrarily change the pop culture referencing rules in the WP:GUNS, especially without discussion and when you're not a prolific or "recognised" editor on the subject. There's a difference between "Being Bold" and "Completely Ignoring Or Deciding You Know Better Than The Project Task Force". I'm not saying I disagree with your changes, but I don't think it's appropriate for you to make them without reference to the people who put a lot of time and effort into the articles and the relevant task force(s). [[User:Commander Zulu|Commander Zulu]] ([[User talk:Commander Zulu|talk]]) 12:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
8804 +++$+++ LWF +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8803 +++$+++ 8803 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.242431220E09 +++$+++ Commander Zulu is right. What you did wasn't being bold, it was a decision to go against consensus that had previously been established. If you think they need to be changed, come to [[WT:GUNS]] and discuss it. You would never try to change a Wikipedia policy or guideline, so let's not try it with Wikiproject policies. If the consensus to change exists, we will discuss with the others how it should read, and I will implement the changes myself.-- +++$+++ :Commander Zulu is right. What you did wasn't being bold, it was a decision to go against consensus that had previously been established. If you think they need to be changed, come to [[WT:GUNS]] and discuss it. You would never try to change a Wikipedia policy or guideline, so let's not try it with Wikiproject policies. If the consensus to change exists, we will discuss with the others how it should read, and I will implement the changes myself.--[[User:LWF|LWF]] ([[User talk:LWF|talk]]) 16:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

523446 +++$+++ Cbrown1023 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 523446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-20 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.166684760E09 +++$+++ Hey, when you close an [[WP:AfD|AfD]], could you make sure that you but <code><nowiki>{{subs:at}}<\/nowiki><\/code> at the top of the page, above the header.  If you don't do that, it messess up the program that counts the pages.  Thanks and happy closing!  +++$+++ Hey, when you close an [[WP:AfD|AfD]], could you make sure that you but <code><nowiki>{{subs:at}}</nowiki></code> at the top of the page, above the header.  If you don't do that, it messess up the program that counts the pages.  Thanks and happy closing! [[User:Cbrown1023|Cbrown1023]] 23:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
523447 +++$+++ Cbrown1023 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 523446 +++$+++ 523446 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.166685420E09 +++$+++ You seem to be a good person to ask on this.  What do you do when an AfD has a \"redirect\" consensus?  Do you delete the article and then redirect to prevent recreation or do you just redirect?  +++$+++ :You seem to be a good person to ask on this.  What do you do when an AfD has a "redirect" consensus?  Do you delete the article and then redirect to prevent recreation or do you just redirect? [[User:Cbrown1023|Cbrown1023]] 23:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

270951 +++$+++ Sarujo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270951 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-13 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.255496700E09 +++$+++ I thought I'd bring these to your attention as there is alot going on here. I would make drastic changes, but I've already cause quite a stur as it is.  +++$+++ I thought I'd bring these to your attention as there is alot going on here. I would make drastic changes, but I've already cause quite a stur as it is. [[User:Sarujo|Sarujo]] ([[User talk:Sarujo|talk]]) 22:05, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
270952 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270951 +++$+++ 270951 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.255497540E09 +++$+++ I am sorry but I am unable to do any copy editing anymore. Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ :I am sorry but I am unable to do any copy editing anymore. Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:19, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

270953 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270953 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-14 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.255564980E09 +++$+++ I think you should give yourself to think calmly and then probably edit [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification#Statement_by_Mattisse]], which I think you wrote while upset and confused (not unreasonably). While Moni3 has sometimes be critical of your conduct, she has consistently been constructive, all the way back to the early mentoring proposals during your ArbCom. While I disagree with Moni3 about many specific issues, I respect her determination to find ways of making progress. Recently Moni3 was the first to suggested a more structured format, some variation of which should remove the free-for-alls that have been confusing for you and for all those whose are trying to help you. If we can agree a business-like format that gets issues resolved clearly and usually quickly and then such a proposal gets ArbCom's blessing, free-for-alls should be very rare and possibly result in severe warnings for those who cause them. In short, I think Moni3's referral to ArbCom and her short-term lock on the monitoring page will be helpful to you. -- +++$+++ I think you should give yourself to think calmly and then probably edit [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Statement_by_Mattisse]], which I think you wrote while upset and confused (not unreasonably). While Moni3 has sometimes be critical of your conduct, she has consistently been constructive, all the way back to the early mentoring proposals during your ArbCom. While I disagree with Moni3 about many specific issues, I respect her determination to find ways of making progress. Recently Moni3 was the first to suggested a more structured format, some variation of which should remove the free-for-alls that have been confusing for you and for all those whose are trying to help you. If we can agree a business-like format that gets issues resolved clearly and usually quickly and then such a proposal gets ArbCom's blessing, free-for-alls should be very rare and possibly result in severe warnings for those who cause them. In short, I think Moni3's referral to ArbCom and her short-term lock on the monitoring page will be helpful to you. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 17:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270954 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270953 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.255565880E09 +++$+++ Moni3 did make a good suggestion, which my monitors\/advisers adapted yesterday and on which we were working. However, Moni3 has also personally attacked me [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=prev&oldid=308309700] and refused to retract when asked by another admin.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=next&oldid=308309700] I cannot trust her. Things are unstable enough without an admin like that involved, taking sides, and locking down my user space page. That is an abuse of admin tools.  \u2014 +++$+++ :*Moni3 did make a good suggestion, which my monitors/advisers adapted yesterday and on which we were working. However, Moni3 has also personally attacked me [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=prev&oldid=308309700] and refused to retract when asked by another admin.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=next&oldid=308309700] I cannot trust her. Things are unstable enough without an admin like that involved, taking sides, and locking down my user space page. That is an abuse of admin tools.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270955 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270953 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.255571400E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, regardless of right or wrong, I think you should chill on rushing to your own defense. It should be clear to you that there are many editors out here who value the work you do on wikipedia and many of them are willing to go the extra mile to help you. However, your situation here, again the validity of the 'why' is no longer important, is rather precarious, and, each and every time you rush to your own defense you only end up slipping down the slope a little further. Others are defending you, let them do it. Far better, I think, to focus on the many people who want to help you than to hunt everywhere for signs of editors trying to diss you. I won't pretend to understand where each and every person who comments on you is coming from but I can quite clearly see where all this will end up if you don't learn to keep the stuff that is inside you - inside. (I'm sorry if this sounds harsh but I think it needs to be said by somebody.) -- +++$+++ ::Mattisse, regardless of right or wrong, I think you should chill on rushing to your own defense. It should be clear to you that there are many editors out here who value the work you do on wikipedia and many of them are willing to go the extra mile to help you. However, your situation here, again the validity of the 'why' is no longer important, is rather precarious, and, each and every time you rush to your own defense you only end up slipping down the slope a little further. Others are defending you, let them do it. Far better, I think, to focus on the many people who want to help you than to hunt everywhere for signs of editors trying to diss you. I won't pretend to understand where each and every person who comments on you is coming from but I can quite clearly see where all this will end up if you don't learn to keep the stuff that is inside you - inside. (I'm sorry if this sounds harsh but I think it needs to be said by somebody.) --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 18:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

8811 +++$+++ Conical Johnson +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-17 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.255792080E09 +++$+++ In case we run into each other again while working on WP, I just want to apologize for my sometimes terse language, which can come off the wrong way, and extend a handshake.  +++$+++ In case we run into each other again while working on WP, I just want to apologize for my sometimes terse language, which can come off the wrong way, and extend a handshake. [[User:Conical Johnson|Conical Johnson]] ([[User talk:Conical Johnson|talk]]) 08:08, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
8812 +++$+++ Conical Johnson +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8811 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.256262420E09 +++$+++ I've made a comment on [[Talk:Effects unit]] regarding the serious need for references, was hoping you'd take a look since you're the major editor on this article right now. Thanks  +++$+++ ::I've made a comment on [[Talk:Effects unit]] regarding the serious need for references, was hoping you'd take a look since you're the major editor on this article right now. Thanks [[User:Conical Johnson|Conical Johnson]] ([[User talk:Conical Johnson|talk]]) 18:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
8813 +++$+++ Conical Johnson +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8811 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-24 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.256435760E09 +++$+++ I notice you reverted the bit about portamento on defretter effects. Care to cite a source on this one?  +++$+++ ::I notice you reverted the bit about portamento on defretter effects. Care to cite a source on this one? [[User:Conical Johnson|Conical Johnson]] ([[User talk:Conical Johnson|talk]]) 18:56, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

270956 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-14 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.255566600E09 +++$+++ These comments [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=319832379] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=319831516] contain inappropriate content -> speculation on motivations of other editors, and making accusing\/deragatory comments about another user without diffs.  Mentors, please discuss with Mattissee whether these comments were appropriate.  I'd appreciate if this could be done in a public forum - here, or somewhere else with a link provided.  +++$+++ These comments [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=319832379] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=319831516] contain inappropriate content -> speculation on motivations of other editors, and making accusing/deragatory comments about another user without diffs.  Mentors, please discuss with Mattissee whether these comments were appropriate.  I'd appreciate if this could be done in a public forum - here, or somewhere else with a link provided. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 17:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270957 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.255567440E09 +++$+++ O.K. I will go through all of SandyGeorgia's edits and post here diffs registering her dissatisfaction. As far as you second point, where did arbcom give SandyGeogria any feedback that she had enhanced influence over what happens to me after arbcom ended or that she has special input into the monitoring? I though it was clear by the arbitration outcome that she did not. Please provide diffs showing that she does.  Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ :O.K. I will go through all of SandyGeorgia's edits and post here diffs registering her dissatisfaction. As far as you second point, where did arbcom give SandyGeogria any feedback that she had enhanced influence over what happens to me after arbcom ended or that she has special input into the monitoring? I though it was clear by the arbitration outcome that she did not. Please provide diffs showing that she does.  Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:44, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270958 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270957 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.255567680E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ ::Thank you. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 17:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270959 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270958 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.255568400E09 +++$+++ The only editor that continually and insistently posted after the page was cleared was SandyGeorgia (and Moni3).(See page edit history [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse%2FMonitoring&action=history]) Not one other editor was posting after the page was cleared yesterday. So the page was locked down to prevent the removal of SandyGeorgia's posts. It was very discouraging to see the \"discussions\" resume after my mentors\/advisers and I had decided that the page could not continue that way. To have SandyGeorgia repeatedly posting, and Moni3 \"explaining\" to SandyGeorgia on the page was exactly what we wanted to eliminate. I removed SandyGeorgia's repeated post to the editorial comment page. Look at the edit history of the page to see if anyone other than SandyGeorgia was making posts.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::The only editor that continually and insistently posted after the page was cleared was SandyGeorgia (and Moni3).(See page edit history [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse%2FMonitoring&action=history]) Not one other editor was posting after the page was cleared yesterday. So the page was locked down to prevent the removal of SandyGeorgia's posts. It was very discouraging to see the "discussions" resume after my mentors/advisers and I had decided that the page could not continue that way. To have SandyGeorgia repeatedly posting, and Moni3 "explaining" to SandyGeorgia on the page was exactly what we wanted to eliminate. I removed SandyGeorgia's repeated post to the editorial comment page. Look at the edit history of the page to see if anyone other than SandyGeorgia was making posts.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:00, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270960 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.255569240E09 +++$+++ I will collect SandyGeorgia's suggestions from the arbitration and we can count how many were accepted.  Is that fair? It is difficult to proof the absence of something. \u2014 +++$+++ *I will collect SandyGeorgia's suggestions from the arbitration and we can count how many were accepted.  Is that fair? It is difficult to proof the absence of something. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:14, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270961 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270960 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.255569840E09 +++$+++ Implies that Moni3 is a tool of SandyGeorgia is ridiculous and insulting to Moni3. I recommend a full an immediate apology to Moni3. Since the ANI has been archived, you would normally not be allowed to edit part of that discussion. However in this case I think it advisable, ''if'' the rules allow it. Karanacs, do you know whether it would be permissible for Mattisse to sanitise that part of her remarks? -- +++$+++ **Implies that Moni3 is a tool of SandyGeorgia is ridiculous and insulting to Moni3. I recommend a full an immediate apology to Moni3. Since the ANI has been archived, you would normally not be allowed to edit part of that discussion. However in this case I think it advisable, ''if'' the rules allow it. Karanacs, do you know whether it would be permissible for Mattisse to sanitise that part of her remarks? --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 18:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270962 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270961 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.255570380E09 +++$+++ I neither require nor desire an apology. I expect people mean what they say, as I do. If they think otherwise afterwards, then I hope that goes to how they behave in the future. Mattisse does not designate what my motivations are, despite what she posts. -- +++$+++ ::: I neither require nor desire an apology. I expect people mean what they say, as I do. If they think otherwise afterwards, then I hope that goes to how they behave in the future. Mattisse does not designate what my motivations are, despite what she posts. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 18:33, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270963 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270962 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.255570620E09 +++$+++ Same here, but there's a bigger issue.  Mattisse is under ArbCom sanction, and she has violated them.  Striking those comments before the arbs review them will be to her benefit.  To answer Philcha's question, yes, I have seen editors strike comments after archiving, and I can't see why anyone reasonable would object.   +++$+++ :::: Same here, but there's a bigger issue.  Mattisse is under ArbCom sanction, and she has violated them.  Striking those comments before the arbs review them will be to her benefit.  To answer Philcha's question, yes, I have seen editors strike comments after archiving, and I can't see why anyone reasonable would object.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270964 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270960 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.255573860E09 +++$+++ Moni3 made up her mind long ago and is not disinterested. Example: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:SandyGeorgia&diff=prev&oldid=311091341] \u2014 +++$+++ **Moni3 made up her mind long ago and is not disinterested. Example: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SandyGeorgia&diff=prev&oldid=311091341] —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:31, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270965 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270964 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.255574700E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, please follow the advice of your mentors.  You are not helping yourself.  The diff you linked expresses the exact same sentiments about your behavior that Arbcom approved; Moni just uses more colorful language.  +++$+++ ***Mattisse, please follow the advice of your mentors.  You are not helping yourself.  The diff you linked expresses the exact same sentiments about your behavior that Arbcom approved; Moni just uses more colorful language. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 19:45, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270966 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.255570500E09 +++$+++ <edit conflict> Philcha, please look at the edit history of the page[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse%2FMonitoring&action=history]. After the page was cleaned up yesterday and my mentors\/advisers were contributing  constructive ideas, SandyGeorgia was the only editor to post. She and Moni3's interference. If you look at the history, you can perhaps understand what I was experiencing. ArbCom made it clear that only I was responsible for my plan.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ *<edit conflict> Philcha, please look at the edit history of the page[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse%2FMonitoring&action=history]. After the page was cleaned up yesterday and my mentors/advisers were contributing  constructive ideas, SandyGeorgia was the only editor to post. She and Moni3's interference. If you look at the history, you can perhaps understand what I was experiencing. ArbCom made it clear that only I was responsible for my plan.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:35, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270967 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270966 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.255570740E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, could you please explain why you think it was wrong for me to post to the talk page, providing a sample to work out the kinks before a new structure was implemented?   +++$+++ :* Mattisse, could you please explain why you think it was wrong for me to post to the talk page, providing a sample to work out the kinks before a new structure was implemented?  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:39, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270968 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270966 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.255575840E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, Moni3 sometimes gets exasperated and blows her top. Unfortunately you seem to have the knack of making that happens, as at the M. by Internet GA review. However Moni3 has put a lot of work into contructive comments over the last 3-4 months, and you should be grateful that someome who has had disputes with you still continues to be constructive. One of the things you need to learn is the difference between disagreement. and hostility. I won't embarrass the innocent by naming them, but there are some editors with whom I have had vigorous debates, but also enoughs laughs - sometimes in the middle of debates. In fact some people treat debates as a sport, like chess or tennis - I sometimes do so if I think I'm dealing with another players of the same \"game\", but try to hold back on WP unless I get the right vibes. After the digression, back to the message: disagreement is not hostility. -- +++$+++ ::Mattisse, Moni3 sometimes gets exasperated and blows her top. Unfortunately you seem to have the knack of making that happens, as at the M. by Internet GA review. However Moni3 has put a lot of work into contructive comments over the last 3-4 months, and you should be grateful that someome who has had disputes with you still continues to be constructive. One of the things you need to learn is the difference between disagreement. and hostility. I won't embarrass the innocent by naming them, but there are some editors with whom I have had vigorous debates, but also enoughs laughs - sometimes in the middle of debates. In fact some people treat debates as a sport, like chess or tennis - I sometimes do so if I think I'm dealing with another players of the same "game", but try to hold back on WP unless I get the right vibes. After the digression, back to the message: disagreement is not hostility. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 20:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270969 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270966 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.255575840E09 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia, would you like to provide diffs or other links? -- +++$+++ ::SandyGeorgia, would you like to provide diffs or other links? --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 20:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270970 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270969 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.255576380E09 +++$+++ Diffs or other links to what?  I'm querying statements made in this very section ... ????  (Including at 18:00 and at 18:35).   +++$+++ ::: Diffs or other links to what?  I'm querying statements made in this very section ... ????  (Including at 18:00 and at 18:35).  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:13, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270971 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270970 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.255576980E09 +++$+++ Maybe SandyGeorgia could explain why she is, to my mind, over preoccupied with me and my failings, as exemplified by this discussion on her talk page[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:SandyGeorgia&diff=next&oldid=311091462#Saddens_me_to_say_it_...] when I have little if anything to do with her. I rarely post on FAC, I no longer do extensive reviews and copy edits of FACs. I have given up for the time being reviewing GAs.  How do I get in SandyGeorgia's way enough for her to go to all this trouble to get me banned? It is ok for Moni3 to blow her stack every now and then, you say Philcha, but when I get hectored by constant negative postings on my page and see my mentors\/advisers attacked it is not understandable that I get upset? I don't understand the rationale. Why does Moni3 even care? is it just because [[Munchausen by Internet]] never made it to GA? Isn't it time  to drop the grudges and leave me alone? My mentors\/advisers have been wonderful and I have learned a lot. It seems to me that my failing are few and are brought on by this hectoring on the mentoring page. Thanks. \u2014 +++$+++ ::::Maybe SandyGeorgia could explain why she is, to my mind, over preoccupied with me and my failings, as exemplified by this discussion on her talk page[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SandyGeorgia&diff=next&oldid=311091462#Saddens_me_to_say_it_...] when I have little if anything to do with her. I rarely post on FAC, I no longer do extensive reviews and copy edits of FACs. I have given up for the time being reviewing GAs.  How do I get in SandyGeorgia's way enough for her to go to all this trouble to get me banned? It is ok for Moni3 to blow her stack every now and then, you say Philcha, but when I get hectored by constant negative postings on my page and see my mentors/advisers attacked it is not understandable that I get upset? I don't understand the rationale. Why does Moni3 even care? is it just because [[Munchausen by Internet]] never made it to GA? Isn't it time  to drop the grudges and leave me alone? My mentors/advisers have been wonderful and I have learned a lot. It seems to me that my failing are few and are brought on by this hectoring on the mentoring page. Thanks. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:23, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270972 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270970 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.255577220E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, that approach would create some short-term risks for you, as there would not be immediate responses to any genuine incidents. You would have to be very disciplined and patient - if you are considering a post that comments on the conduct or motives of other editors, contact one or more of your mentors and delay the post until you get feedback from the mentors you contact - starting now, and with this Talk page. -- +++$+++ :::*Mattisse, that approach would create some short-term risks for you, as there would not be immediate responses to any genuine incidents. You would have to be very disciplined and patient - if you are considering a post that comments on the conduct or motives of other editors, contact one or more of your mentors and delay the post until you get feedback from the mentors you contact - starting now, and with this Talk page. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 20:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270973 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270972 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.255577280E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, part of dispute resolution is a willingness to engage in dialogue with other editors.  You've never done that, and are changing the subject here.  I asked why you think it was wrong of me to post a sample to talk; will you please answer?  And where have I ever tried to get you banned?  I can't think of any two editors who have worked as hard as Moni and I have at avoiding what is happening today; you ending up back at ArbCom because you didn't consult your mentors or take their advice.   Please answer the question:  why do you think it was wrong for me to post a trivial sample on your monitoring talk page, to help get a better structure in place ? (Philcha, for gosh sakes, Mattisse doesn't deal well with page moves; leave this where it started.  We've got too damn many pages already, with discussion about Mattisse spreading all over wiki!)   +++$+++ ::::: Mattisse, part of dispute resolution is a willingness to engage in dialogue with other editors.  You've never done that, and are changing the subject here.  I asked why you think it was wrong of me to post a sample to talk; will you please answer?  And where have I ever tried to get you banned?  I can't think of any two editors who have worked as hard as Moni and I have at avoiding what is happening today; you ending up back at ArbCom because you didn't consult your mentors or take their advice.   Please answer the question:  why do you think it was wrong for me to post a trivial sample on your monitoring talk page, to help get a better structure in place ? (Philcha, for gosh sakes, Mattisse doesn't deal well with page moves; leave this where it started.  We've got too damn many pages already, with discussion about Mattisse spreading all over wiki!)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270974 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270972 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.255577880E09 +++$+++ Philcha, I'm still unclear why you're requesting a diff?  Perhaps because you didn't see the monitoring talk page before it got chopped?  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse\/Monitoring&oldid=319820132 Here it is.]   +++$+++ ::::: Philcha, I'm still unclear why you're requesting a diff?  Perhaps because you didn't see the monitoring talk page before it got chopped?  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse/Monitoring&oldid=319820132 Here it is.]  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270975 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270974 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.255578180E09 +++$+++ [[User:SandyGeorgia|SandyGeorgia]], I apologise if I missed something - as I said, this Talk thread is becoming thoroughly muddled, and that's why I suggesting discussing a structure of mentoring at a subpage of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification]]. -- +++$+++ ::::::[[User:SandyGeorgia|SandyGeorgia]], I apologise if I missed something - as I said, this Talk thread is becoming thoroughly muddled, and that's why I suggesting discussing a structure of mentoring at a subpage of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification]]. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 20:43, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270976 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.255578360E09 +++$+++ No problem, I just was unclear what you were asking, and wanted to be sure.   +++$+++ :::::::: No problem, I just was unclear what you were asking, and wanted to be sure.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:46, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270977 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.255578300E09 +++$+++ <edit conflict> To SandyGeorgia.  Because my mentors\/advisers and I had just undergone a rough period of time with multiple attacks on them, arguments between editors on the monitoring page etc. that I have described elsewhere. And we had decided to have a strict format so that the monitoring page was not a free for all. After the page had been cleared for the last time and my mentors\/advisers and I were discussing the format, you posted a longish post that Moni3 felt she had to answer, and you to answer that etc. and the who dismal situation of editors discussing me in the third person again on a page that was meant for communication between me and my advisers\/mentors. Why did you insist that you had to post right then? Why could you not allow me and my advisers\/mentors a little breather to collect ourselves. Some editor called [[User:Unitanode]], whom I have never heard of and never had any interactions with,  posted six times in one day (August 13) on my talk page, as well as a multitude of times on the monitoring page, as well as posting individually to my mentors\/advisers, to your talk page, to NewYorkBrad etc. Do you not think it is time to step back for a while? Why are all these people involved that I have had no connection with? Why the full court press? The new format for the monitoring page was meant to stop all this, and restrict posts by other editors to a brief comment, plus diffs, plus a statement of expectations and notes by mentors\/editors. It was very discouraging to see the whole circus begin instantly again when we actually had a format in hand.  Why not give us a chance? Thanks.  \u2014 +++$+++ *<edit conflict> To SandyGeorgia.  Because my mentors/advisers and I had just undergone a rough period of time with multiple attacks on them, arguments between editors on the monitoring page etc. that I have described elsewhere. And we had decided to have a strict format so that the monitoring page was not a free for all. After the page had been cleared for the last time and my mentors/advisers and I were discussing the format, you posted a longish post that Moni3 felt she had to answer, and you to answer that etc. and the who dismal situation of editors discussing me in the third person again on a page that was meant for communication between me and my advisers/mentors. Why did you insist that you had to post right then? Why could you not allow me and my advisers/mentors a little breather to collect ourselves. Some editor called [[User:Unitanode]], whom I have never heard of and never had any interactions with,  posted six times in one day (August 13) on my talk page, as well as a multitude of times on the monitoring page, as well as posting individually to my mentors/advisers, to your talk page, to NewYorkBrad etc. Do you not think it is time to step back for a while? Why are all these people involved that I have had no connection with? Why the full court press? The new format for the monitoring page was meant to stop all this, and restrict posts by other editors to a brief comment, plus diffs, plus a statement of expectations and notes by mentors/editors. It was very discouraging to see the whole circus begin instantly again when we actually had a format in hand.  Why not give us a chance? Thanks.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:45, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270978 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270977 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.255578600E09 +++$+++ I am not sure what you are referring to, Mattisse.  I posted a trivial sample so your mentors could see if the proposed structure would work, on talk.  What exactly are you talking about?  I was trying to help you and your mentors, by providing a sample on talk. If I had bad intentions towards you, I could have just waited for the structure to be put in place, and load it up with multiple examples; have I done that ? I just provided a diff for Philcha of the page before you started moving things; where are these posts you are referring to?   +++$+++ :* I am not sure what you are referring to, Mattisse.  I posted a trivial sample so your mentors could see if the proposed structure would work, on talk.  What exactly are you talking about?  I was trying to help you and your mentors, by providing a sample on talk. If I had bad intentions towards you, I could have just waited for the structure to be put in place, and load it up with multiple examples; have I done that ? I just provided a diff for Philcha of the page before you started moving things; where are these posts you are referring to?  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270979 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270977 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.255578720E09 +++$+++ Also, FYI, you haven't yet struck the comments about me at AN\/I as recommended by Philcha above.  For me, there's no difference, but it will help your case before the arbs.   +++$+++ :* Also, FYI, you haven't yet struck the comments about me at AN/I as recommended by Philcha above.  For me, there's no difference, but it will help your case before the arbs.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270980 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270979 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.255579740E09 +++$+++ I believe that I struck through the part Phicha suggested  as soon as he suggested it. I will check and do it again, if necessary.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::*I believe that I struck through the part Phicha suggested  as soon as he suggested it. I will check and do it again, if necessary.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:09, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270981 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.255579320E09 +++$+++ <edit conflict x 2> I have lost my edits and I am tired. If you look through the edit history of the monitoring page, you will see exactly what happened on that page. And that is not counting the constant posts and edit conflicts on my talk page. We had worked out a format, we were finalizing it. We had cleared the page of extraneous posts. Sandy Georgia posted, Moni3 felt she had to post in response and the whole vicious cycle was returning. It had to be nipped in the bud. Next others would be giving their opinions who were not mentors\/advisers etc. etc. Give us a chance to catch our breath. If you have a complaint, you will be asked to post a (very brief e.g. one sentence) description with a diff, reference the norm violated in the Arbcom, the damage you felt it did to Wikipedia, what you expect the mentors\/advisers to do. Then the complaint can be processed in an orderly fashion. More suggestions at this point is not helpful. Let us try out our format. Thanks. \u2014 +++$+++ * <edit conflict x 2> I have lost my edits and I am tired. If you look through the edit history of the monitoring page, you will see exactly what happened on that page. And that is not counting the constant posts and edit conflicts on my talk page. We had worked out a format, we were finalizing it. We had cleared the page of extraneous posts. Sandy Georgia posted, Moni3 felt she had to post in response and the whole vicious cycle was returning. It had to be nipped in the bud. Next others would be giving their opinions who were not mentors/advisers etc. etc. Give us a chance to catch our breath. If you have a complaint, you will be asked to post a (very brief e.g. one sentence) description with a diff, reference the norm violated in the Arbcom, the damage you felt it did to Wikipedia, what you expect the mentors/advisers to do. Then the complaint can be processed in an orderly fashion. More suggestions at this point is not helpful. Let us try out our format. Thanks. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:02, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270982 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.255579620E09 +++$+++ There was a mistaken impression that the monitoring page was a free-for-all where anyone can post suggestions\/arguments\/complaints how ever they feel and whatever format they choose. We wanted that stopped as that had become impossibly overloaded and negative. Now it is only the mentors\/advisers that will post on the monitoring page for the time being. ArbCom made it clear that I was responsible for these mentoring pages and that I was in charge. SandyGeorgia is insisting on doing it her way right now. I am saying no, we need to collect our thoughts and ideas about what has happened already. There is no reason to put people under this much stress and expect them to operate optimally. Thanks, \u2014 +++$+++ :There was a mistaken impression that the monitoring page was a free-for-all where anyone can post suggestions/arguments/complaints how ever they feel and whatever format they choose. We wanted that stopped as that had become impossibly overloaded and negative. Now it is only the mentors/advisers that will post on the monitoring page for the time being. ArbCom made it clear that I was responsible for these mentoring pages and that I was in charge. SandyGeorgia is insisting on doing it her way right now. I am saying no, we need to collect our thoughts and ideas about what has happened already. There is no reason to put people under this much stress and expect them to operate optimally. Thanks, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270983 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270982 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.255579980E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, Mattisse, but you can no longer avoid necessary dispute resolution by claiming that you're too tired to back up your statements after dissing another editor.  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse\/Monitoring&oldid=319820132 This is the page just before you started moving posts.] WHERE are these posts you mention?  That sample was an explicit example of exactly what you and your mentors were working on, specifically placed only on talk to help out in the effort.  When you make derogatory statements about other editors, you need to be sure you are correct, and you need to be able to back them with diffs.  Your misunderstanding of me and my motives has caused enough agida for all of Wiki that it is time for you to provide diffs, not say you're too tired.  The edit conflicts, which caused this whole brouhaha, and caused you to be so tired, only happened because you didn't explain what you were doing, didn't answer queries, and didn't wait for your mentors.  It's time that you started treating other editors the way you want to be treated. I will be out for most of the evening, and all day tomorrow.  I will be checking to see if you've struck your post at AN\/I, because it is time that you started listening to your mentors and treating other editors fairly. If you aren't able to find it, perhaps a mentor will help, as I'll be out.   +++$+++ :: I'm sorry, Mattisse, but you can no longer avoid necessary dispute resolution by claiming that you're too tired to back up your statements after dissing another editor.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse/Monitoring&oldid=319820132 This is the page just before you started moving posts.] WHERE are these posts you mention?  That sample was an explicit example of exactly what you and your mentors were working on, specifically placed only on talk to help out in the effort.  When you make derogatory statements about other editors, you need to be sure you are correct, and you need to be able to back them with diffs.  Your misunderstanding of me and my motives has caused enough agida for all of Wiki that it is time for you to provide diffs, not say you're too tired.  The edit conflicts, which caused this whole brouhaha, and caused you to be so tired, only happened because you didn't explain what you were doing, didn't answer queries, and didn't wait for your mentors.  It's time that you started treating other editors the way you want to be treated. I will be out for most of the evening, and all day tomorrow.  I will be checking to see if you've struck your post at AN/I, because it is time that you started listening to your mentors and treating other editors fairly. If you aren't able to find it, perhaps a mentor will help, as I'll be out.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:13, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270984 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270983 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.255581360E09 +++$+++ I am not trying to avoid anything. Please assume good faith and do not automatically disparage me.  I am sick of repeating myself. But I will do it again. My advisors\/mentors were in the process of coming up with a strict format to prevent free-form suggestion, comments, criticisms, discussion between other editors who were not advisers\/mentors from occurring on that page, as it was disruptive. We were undergoing that process when Moni3 decided to lock down the page. Therefore, until it is unlocked not much can be done. Once we are able, my advisers\/mentors and I will continue our work. It is not true that anyone has a right to post on my userspace page. I have determined that for now, only my advisers\/mentors can post there so we can complete our work without disruption. It is not productive to insist on posting on that page. Thanks,  \u2014 +++$+++ :::I am not trying to avoid anything. Please assume good faith and do not automatically disparage me.  I am sick of repeating myself. But I will do it again. My advisors/mentors were in the process of coming up with a strict format to prevent free-form suggestion, comments, criticisms, discussion between other editors who were not advisers/mentors from occurring on that page, as it was disruptive. We were undergoing that process when Moni3 decided to lock down the page. Therefore, until it is unlocked not much can be done. Once we are able, my advisers/mentors and I will continue our work. It is not true that anyone has a right to post on my userspace page. I have determined that for now, only my advisers/mentors can post there so we can complete our work without disruption. It is not productive to insist on posting on that page. Thanks,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:36, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270985 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270956 +++$+++ 270984 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.255581660E09 +++$+++ And ''you, and only you'' caused this whole brouhaha, resulting in you being before ArbCom again, because you acted unilaterally, apparently based on a misunderstanding, and without consulting your mentors, again.  When you cause problems, you have to accept the tiring consequences of dealing with the fallout.  A huge percentage of Wiki's best editors are involved now in trying to help you.  Please start helping yourself.  If you can't back disparaging comments you make about other editors, stop making them.  I agree with the sentiment below that everyone would be well advised to take a breather, but unfortunately on Wiki, once you start problems, they tend to spiral.  That's the nature of Wiki, so it's best not to start them to begin with.   +++$+++ :::: And ''you, and only you'' caused this whole brouhaha, resulting in you being before ArbCom again, because you acted unilaterally, apparently based on a misunderstanding, and without consulting your mentors, again.  When you cause problems, you have to accept the tiring consequences of dealing with the fallout.  A huge percentage of Wiki's best editors are involved now in trying to help you.  Please start helping yourself.  If you can't back disparaging comments you make about other editors, stop making them.  I agree with the sentiment below that everyone would be well advised to take a breather, but unfortunately on Wiki, once you start problems, they tend to spiral.  That's the nature of Wiki, so it's best not to start them to begin with.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

613138 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613138 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-24 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.209091620E09 +++$+++ Dave, I've looked through the Edit histories, and I believe the comment in question is this one on Guettarda's Talk Page: \"By contrast, I have explained how your edits are POV, and three or four other people, such as Dave Souza, clearly saw the same thing I did.\" Both Guettarda and Orangemarlin were engaging in the same POV pushing, but with respect to the \"clearly saw the same thing\", that was specifically in reference to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Expelled%3A_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=207316453&oldid=207297633 this edit], in which you properly reverted Orangemarlin's revert of my edit. Although both Guettarda and Orangemarlin were engaged in such behavior, the comment about you specifically referenced Orangemarlin. Sorry for the confusion.  +++$+++ Dave, I've looked through the Edit histories, and I believe the comment in question is this one on Guettarda's Talk Page: "By contrast, I have explained how your edits are POV, and three or four other people, such as Dave Souza, clearly saw the same thing I did." Both Guettarda and Orangemarlin were engaging in the same POV pushing, but with respect to the "clearly saw the same thing", that was specifically in reference to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Expelled%3A_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=207316453&oldid=207297633 this edit], in which you properly reverted Orangemarlin's revert of my edit. Although both Guettarda and Orangemarlin were engaged in such behavior, the comment about you specifically referenced Orangemarlin. Sorry for the confusion. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 19:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
613139 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613138 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.209094980E09 +++$+++ Ah, seems to have been some confusion and I didn't notice this till now. From memory, I didn't actually revert OM's reversion of your edit, but rather went through the issues and agreed with some but not others of the points. Hope that's put things to rest. ..  +++$+++ ::Ah, seems to have been some confusion and I didn't notice this till now. From memory, I didn't actually revert OM's reversion of your edit, but rather went through the issues and agreed with some but not others of the points. Hope that's put things to rest. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

533102 +++$+++ Iomesus +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-02 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.204525440E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Iomesus|Iomesus]] ([[User talk:Iomesus|talk]]) 22:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
533103 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533102 +++$+++ 533102 +++$+++ 2008-03-08 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.205036400E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article about Big-O had no content whatsoever so no point in keeping an empty article. You can write some content. The other one is existing, I didn't delete it... --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article about Big-O had no content whatsoever so no point in keeping an empty article. You can write some content. The other one is existing, I didn't delete it... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

533104 +++$+++ SusanLesch +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-09 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.205057340E09 +++$+++ Hello, Tone. Your name was mentioned [[Talk:Main_Page#Errors_in_In_the_news|here]] as a person who might be able to help. Best wishes. - +++$+++ Hello, Tone. Your name was mentioned [[Talk:Main_Page#Errors_in_In_the_news|here]] as a person who might be able to help. Best wishes. -[[User:Susanlesch|Susanlesch]] ([[User talk:Susanlesch|talk]]) 03:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
533105 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533104 +++$+++ 533104 +++$+++ 2008-03-09 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.205122560E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted in prod process, since you object, there is no problem with restoring. However, I invite you to add some references to the article to make it better. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted in prod process, since you object, there is no problem with restoring. However, I invite you to add some references to the article to make it better. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

8818 +++$+++ Collectonian +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8818 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-06 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.260142860E09 +++$+++ Please stop attempting to add illustrations to notability guidelines. They do not benefit from them and it only clutters the page, and could confuse new editors. --  +++$+++ Please stop attempting to add illustrations to notability guidelines. They do not benefit from them and it only clutters the page, and could confuse new editors. -- [[User:Collectonian|<span style='font-family: "Comic Sans MS"; color:#5342FF'>Collectonian</span>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Collectonian|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 15:41, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
8819 +++$+++ Fences and windows +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8818 +++$+++ 8818 +++$+++ 2009-12-19 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.261218240E09 +++$+++ And ditto the civility and NPA pages. I've removed the pictures, they are frankly bizarre. And I am amazed you would think that a [[Carlos Latuff]] picture to illustrate an apology is a good idea on a policy page; he's rather controversial.  +++$+++ :And ditto the civility and NPA pages. I've removed the pictures, they are frankly bizarre. And I am amazed you would think that a [[Carlos Latuff]] picture to illustrate an apology is a good idea on a policy page; he's rather controversial. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:grey;">&amp;</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 02:24, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

482067 +++$+++  +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up first time nominating a page in AFD it's done. EnsRedShirt 18:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up first time nominating a page in AFD it's done. EnsRedShirt 18:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
482068 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482067 +++$+++ 482067 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.164934380E09 +++$+++ The last section is the only one that ''is'' wikified.  All of the city names and such throughout the rest of the article can be wikified.  \u2014 +++$+++ :The last section is the only one that ''is'' wikified.  All of the city names and such throughout the rest of the article can be wikified.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 16:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

533109 +++$+++ MATKD +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533109 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-14 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.205490360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:MATKD|MATKD]] ([[User talk:MATKD|talk]]) 03:26, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
533110 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533109 +++$+++ 533109 +++$+++ 2008-03-14 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.205541240E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted in a standard prod procedure. Since you object, I restored it. You may want to fix the references in the article so that they will fit the wiki-style and so that they won't be just a bunch of external links. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted in a standard prod procedure. Since you object, I restored it. You may want to fix the references in the article so that they will fit the wiki-style and so that they won't be just a bunch of external links. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
533111 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533109 +++$+++ 533109 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.206141840E09 +++$+++ Hi. Teh article in question was just a list of external links and this is in direct contradiction with a guideline for an encyclopedic article. I believe that the content is useful, it is only not appropriate fot WP. If you need the content of the article, I can provide it to you but I don't think it would be ok to restore the article completely. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Teh article in question was just a list of external links and this is in direct contradiction with a guideline for an encyclopedic article. I believe that the content is useful, it is only not appropriate fot WP. If you need the content of the article, I can provide it to you but I don't think it would be ok to restore the article completely. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

8822 +++$+++ unforgettableid +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-08 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.265679960E09 +++$+++ Cheers, -- +++$+++ Cheers, --[[User:unforgettableid|unforgettableid]] | [[User_talk:unforgettableid|talk]] 17:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
8823 +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8822 +++$+++ 8822 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.266068520E09 +++$+++ Hi, I appreciate your suggestion about being more concise. I agree with the example from the Ghostwriting article. The comment about the missing space in the Ghostwriting article I found patronizing. It was a minor typo in a contribution that otherwise--I think--was fairly helpful (adding a longer lede). I suppose it is a matter of personal editing style; you perhaps view it as an \"unfinished edit\" or carelessness. I don't agree with your statement that you cannot merge sections. Wikipedia has a tendency to have too many headings. Look at an Encyclopedia Brittannica article for a topic, and then look at the Wikipedia equivalent. In some cases where Brittanica will have two headings for an entire article, a Wikipedia has a new heading for every paragraph. Your statement that a person should not merge sections makes it sound as if by putting something in a heading, it is then \"protected\" against being merged. I don't agree that one or two sentences should have a separate section heading. Starting with positive statements was a good idea...too often people focus on the negative elements. The emoticons are friendly. Thanks +++$+++ : Hi, I appreciate your suggestion about being more concise. I agree with the example from the Ghostwriting article. The comment about the missing space in the Ghostwriting article I found patronizing. It was a minor typo in a contribution that otherwise--I think--was fairly helpful (adding a longer lede). I suppose it is a matter of personal editing style; you perhaps view it as an "unfinished edit" or carelessness. I don't agree with your statement that you cannot merge sections. Wikipedia has a tendency to have too many headings. Look at an Encyclopedia Brittannica article for a topic, and then look at the Wikipedia equivalent. In some cases where Brittanica will have two headings for an entire article, a Wikipedia has a new heading for every paragraph. Your statement that a person should not merge sections makes it sound as if by putting something in a heading, it is then "protected" against being merged. I don't agree that one or two sentences should have a separate section heading. Starting with positive statements was a good idea...too often people focus on the negative elements. The emoticons are friendly. Thanks[[User:OnBeyondZebrax|OnBeyondZebrax]] ([[User talk:OnBeyondZebrax|talk]]) 05:42, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
8824 +++$+++ unforgettableid +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8822 +++$+++ 8823 +++$+++ 2010-05-12 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.273655040E09 +++$+++ Best regards, -- +++$+++ :: Best regards, --[[User:unforgettableid|unforgettableid]] | [[User_talk:unforgettableid|talk]] 02:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

533114 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533114 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-21 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.206142980E09 +++$+++ I;ve created [[List of lakes in Slovenia]] but could you add the englishized some of the lake e.g Lake ... and then the slovenian name (.... jezero) in brackets? When that is done I can add the lakes to the hyrdology template with rivers cheers  +++$+++ I;ve created [[List of lakes in Slovenia]] but could you add the englishized some of the lake e.g Lake ... and then the slovenian name (.... jezero) in brackets? When that is done I can add the lakes to the hyrdology template with rivers cheers [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">'''$1,000,000?'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 16:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
533115 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533114 +++$+++ 533114 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.206143160E09 +++$+++ Hi. Nice idea with the project. About the templates, the problem with translation is that in Slovenian, you make an adjective while you don't use it in English as such. So there is Cerkni\u0161ko jezero and [[Cerknica Lake]]. So shall I put both? Translation as such can be tricky, I don't want to invent new namings... I can help but be more specific. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Nice idea with the project. About the templates, the problem with translation is that in Slovenian, you make an adjective while you don't use it in English as such. So there is Cerkniško jezero and [[Cerknica Lake]]. So shall I put both? Translation as such can be tricky, I don't want to invent new namings... I can help but be more specific. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

8828 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-06 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.267911120E09 +++$+++ I assume the citation you added recently to [[heavy metal music]] was from a website. Can you add the URL, publication date, and access date?  +++$+++ I assume the citation you added recently to [[heavy metal music]] was from a website. Can you add the URL, publication date, and access date? [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 13:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
8829 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8828 +++$+++ 8828 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.267996680E09 +++$+++ You need to indicate in the citation where you get the information, and if it was online, you need to include the retrieval date. It does not matter if there's a payment fee. Otherwise the citation is imcomplete and should be removed.  +++$+++ :You need to indicate in the citation where you get the information, and if it was online, you need to include the retrieval date. It does not matter if there's a payment fee. Otherwise the citation is imcomplete and should be removed. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 13:18, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

533118 +++$+++ Mika1h +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-20 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.206081060E09 +++$+++ Someone recreated an article you deleted last fall: [[Antagarich]]. I just thought you should know since it still lacks the real world info you cited as the reason for deletion. -- +++$+++ Someone recreated an article you deleted last fall: [[Antagarich]]. I just thought you should know since it still lacks the real world info you cited as the reason for deletion. --[[User:Mika1h|Mika1h]] ([[User talk:Mika1h|talk]]) 23:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
533119 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533118 +++$+++ 533118 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.206216720E09 +++$+++ Ok, I will recreate the article and put it to afd. During the process, there will be enough suggestions how to improve it. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, I will recreate the article and put it to afd. During the process, there will be enough suggestions how to improve it. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

533120 +++$+++ Andrejj +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533120 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-21 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.206142440E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Crnikal.jpg? -- +++$+++ http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Crnikal.jpg? --[[User:Andrejj|AndrejJ]] ([[User talk:Andrejj|talk]]) 16:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
533121 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533120 +++$+++ 533120 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.206216720E09 +++$+++ Urejeno. LP --''' +++$+++ : Urejeno. LP --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
533122 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533120 +++$+++ 533120 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.206216720E09 +++$+++ After re-checking, I see that the prod process was carried out not in the perfect way. So I will recreate the article and nominate it on afd, I hope you can fix the problems during the process. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : After re-checking, I see that the prod process was carried out not in the perfect way. So I will recreate the article and nominate it on afd, I hope you can fix the problems during the process. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
533123 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533120 +++$+++ 533120 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.206216720E09 +++$+++ Hi. Can you tell me which article it was? I can't really help you if I don't know which article we talk about... Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Can you tell me which article it was? I can't really help you if I don't know which article we talk about... Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

8835 +++$+++ intelati +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-09 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.281423300E09 +++$+++ Lead is fine-- +++$+++ Lead is fine--[[User:intelati|<FONT COLOR="#FF0000">in</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">te</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">la</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">ti</FONT>]] 23:55, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
8836 +++$+++ intelati +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8835 +++$+++ 8835 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.281423600E09 +++$+++ you some how broke the \"soldiers\" row?-- +++$+++ :you some how broke the "soldiers" row?--[[User:intelati|<FONT COLOR="#FF0000">in</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">te</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">la</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">ti</FONT>]] 00:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
8837 +++$+++ intelati +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8835 +++$+++ 8836 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.281423960E09 +++$+++ It's acctually still broken somehow-- +++$+++ ::It's acctually still broken somehow--[[User:intelati|<FONT COLOR="#FF0000">in</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">te</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">la</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">ti</FONT>]] 00:06, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
8838 +++$+++ intelati +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8835 +++$+++ 8837 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.281424140E09 +++$+++ Got it you forgot (deleted) the \"|-|rowspan=2\" tag. nice working with you. :) -- +++$+++ :::Got it you forgot (deleted) the "|-|rowspan=2" tag. nice working with you. :) --[[User:intelati|<FONT COLOR="#FF0000">in</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">te</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">la</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">ti</FONT>]] 00:09, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
8839 +++$+++ intelati +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8835 +++$+++ 8838 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.281424320E09 +++$+++ the \"rowspan\" makes the movies for the year line up.-- +++$+++ ::::the "rowspan" makes the movies for the year line up.--[[User:intelati|<FONT COLOR="#FF0000">in</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">te</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">la</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">ti</FONT>]] 00:12, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
8840 +++$+++ intelati +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8835 +++$+++ 8839 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.281424680E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Now get back to work :). -- +++$+++ :::::You're welcome. Now get back to work :). --[[User:intelati|<FONT COLOR="#FF0000">in</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">te</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">la</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">ti</FONT>]] 00:18, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
8841 +++$+++ intelati +++$+++ OnBeyondZebrax +++$+++ 8835 +++$+++ 8835 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.281423720E09 +++$+++ thanks that's perfect. -- +++$+++ :thanks that's perfect. --[[User:intelati|<FONT COLOR="#FF0000">in</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">te</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">la</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">ti</FONT>]] 00:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

533124 +++$+++ Andrejj +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533124 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-22 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.206215520E09 +++$+++ Prosim poglej, naveden je vir, pa kljub temu dodaja unreferenced. -- +++$+++ Prosim poglej, naveden je vir, pa kljub temu dodaja unreferenced. --[[User:Andrejj|AndrejJ]] ([[User talk:Andrejj|talk]]) 12:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
533125 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533124 +++$+++ 533124 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.206236280E09 +++$+++ Odstranjena predloga. LP --''' +++$+++ : Odstranjena predloga. LP --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

533126 +++$+++ Andrejj +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-22 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.206236100E09 +++$+++ Pa spet in spet, pa tudi [[Zidani Most]], pravzaprav skoraj vsi slovenski kraji. -- +++$+++ Pa spet in spet, pa tudi [[Zidani Most]], pravzaprav skoraj vsi slovenski kraji. --[[User:Andrejj|AndrejJ]] ([[User talk:Andrejj|talk]]) 18:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
533127 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533126 +++$+++ 533126 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.206236280E09 +++$+++ Ja kaj ho\u010de\u0161, saj res nima referenc. Osebno se zavzemam za referencirane \u010dlanke, tukaj na en: imam nekoliko stro\u017eja na\u010dela kot na sl: Predlagam, da damo nalogo na taskforce Slovenia, da se \u010dlanke opremi z referencami. Saj pri ve\u010dini bi se dalo shajati s popisom, samo zunanjo povezavo je treba dodati (trenutno je samo np.) Potem pa AWB hitro opravi delo (samo jaz ga nimam). --''' +++$+++ : Ja kaj hočeš, saj res nima referenc. Osebno se zavzemam za referencirane članke, tukaj na en: imam nekoliko strožja načela kot na sl: Predlagam, da damo nalogo na taskforce Slovenia, da se članke opremi z referencami. Saj pri večini bi se dalo shajati s popisom, samo zunanjo povezavo je treba dodati (trenutno je samo np.) Potem pa AWB hitro opravi delo (samo jaz ga nimam). --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

533130 +++$+++ Andrejj +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-24 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.206372300E09 +++$+++ Prosim te tudi, \u010de lahko za\u0161\u010diti\u0161 [[User:Andrejj]] pred anonimi. -- +++$+++ Prosim te tudi, če lahko zaščitiš [[User:Andrejj]] pred anonimi. --[[User:Andrejj|AndrejJ]] ([[User talk:Andrejj|talk]]) 08:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
533131 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533130 +++$+++ 533130 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.206381360E09 +++$+++ Sem za\u0161\u010ditil tvojo stran. Kar se ti\u010de referenc, footnote notacija je verjetno bolj\u0161a, \u010de se ti da. Gooddays ima pa hecen smisel za humor, res je. Jaz sem tukaj admin in se mi ne zdi prav vpletati \u010de ni ravno kr\u0161enja pravil, lahko pa prosi\u0161 za komentar kak\u0161nega nevtralnega, da pove svoje mnenje ([[WP:RFC]]). Seveda mu lahko spet na pogovorno stran nalima\u0161 komentar. --''' +++$+++ : Sem zaščitil tvojo stran. Kar se tiče referenc, footnote notacija je verjetno boljša, če se ti da. Gooddays ima pa hecen smisel za humor, res je. Jaz sem tukaj admin in se mi ne zdi prav vpletati če ni ravno kršenja pravil, lahko pa prosiš za komentar kakšnega nevtralnega, da pove svoje mnenje ([[WP:RFC]]). Seveda mu lahko spet na pogovorno stran nalimaš komentar. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

270987 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.255580100E09 +++$+++ Follow the advice. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ Follow the advice. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 21:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270988 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270987 +++$+++ 270987 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.255580340E09 +++$+++ I agree totally. -- +++$+++ :I agree totally. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 21:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270989 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270987 +++$+++ 270988 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.255581480E09 +++$+++ Me [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse&action=historysubmit&diff=319861561&oldid=319859350 three]. -- +++$+++ ::Me [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMattisse&action=historysubmit&diff=319861561&oldid=319859350 three]. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 21:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270990 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270987 +++$+++ 270987 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.255581600E09 +++$+++ OK. I have just now read this part of my page. I will do no more commenting anywhere. I am so grateful that you guys are willing to keep working with me. I feel that we have a format pretty well nailed down to try out as a complaint form. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ *OK. I have just now read this part of my page. I will do no more commenting anywhere. I am so grateful that you guys are willing to keep working with me. I feel that we have a format pretty well nailed down to try out as a complaint form. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

533132 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-24 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.206390000E09 +++$+++ Hi. How is it going? Could I ask you for a comment since you can be neutral here. I am having some hard times with [[User:Gooddays]]. He is massively tagging article with unref and cleanup templates, although a great part of the articles are in fact referenced and do not require cleanup, at least not an obvious one. Any attempts to clear this out have been met with an reaction that I consider a rude provocation (or with blanking user talk). Can you have a look? Thanks. --''' +++$+++ Hi. How is it going? Could I ask you for a comment since you can be neutral here. I am having some hard times with [[User:Gooddays]]. He is massively tagging article with unref and cleanup templates, although a great part of the articles are in fact referenced and do not require cleanup, at least not an obvious one. Any attempts to clear this out have been met with an reaction that I consider a rude provocation (or with blanking user talk). Can you have a look? Thanks. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
533133 +++$+++ Shoessss +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533132 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.206392520E09 +++$+++ Good, and you guy?  I think you have a well-intentioned new editor here.  I did look over the articles he\/she was tagging, and your right.  Just a tad over the top there :-). I left a note on the user\u2019s page.  Hope it helps. <font face=\"Times New Roman\"> +++$+++ :::Good, and you guy?  I think you have a well-intentioned new editor here.  I did look over the articles he/she was tagging, and your right.  Just a tad over the top there :-). I left a note on the user’s page.  Hope it helps. <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></font> 14:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

533134 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-24 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.206403620E09 +++$+++ Hi there! I just thought I'd make a clarification on the talk page archiving thing. Users are allowed to remove any comments from their talk page. If a user removes a comment, it's best to just take it as acknowledgement of the post.  +++$+++ Hi there! I just thought I'd make a clarification on the talk page archiving thing. Users are allowed to remove any comments from their talk page. If a user removes a comment, it's best to just take it as acknowledgement of the post. [[User:Seraphim Whipp|<font color="FF69B4">Seraphim&hearts;</font>]]  [[User_talk:Seraphim Whipp|<sup><font color="black">Whipp</font></sup>]] 17:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
533135 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533134 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.206403740E09 +++$+++ Ok, acknowledged. After all, it's all in the history that should not get deleted. --''' +++$+++ :: Ok, acknowledged. After all, it's all in the history that should not get deleted. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:09, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
533136 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533134 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.206403920E09 +++$+++ Exactly :)! That's why I wasn't sure why the talk page was deleted, but I see that the deleting admin would have deleted a page called \"old\" not \"talk page archive\" and that would mislead.  +++$+++ :::Exactly :)! That's why I wasn't sure why the talk page was deleted, but I see that the deleting admin would have deleted a page called "old" not "talk page archive" and that would mislead. [[User:Seraphim Whipp|<font color="FF69B4">Seraphim&hearts;</font>]]  [[User_talk:Seraphim Whipp|<sup><font color="black">Whipp</font></sup>]] 17:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
533137 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533134 +++$+++ 533134 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.206406020E09 +++$+++ Hi. This article was nominated for deletion, see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Magillem]]. The problem asserted is that it does not meet guidelines for organizations, see [[WP:CORP]]. If you want the article back, you should nominate it on deletion review, not recreate it. I hope it helps. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. This article was nominated for deletion, see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magillem]]. The problem asserted is that it does not meet guidelines for organizations, see [[WP:CORP]]. If you want the article back, you should nominate it on deletion review, not recreate it. I hope it helps. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

270991 +++$+++ Hipocrite +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.255580640E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification]] is not for threaded discussion. If you simply must respond to someone, you have to respond to them in your own section - not in their section. Thanks.  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification]] is not for threaded discussion. If you simply must respond to someone, you have to respond to them in your own section - not in their section. Thanks. [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] ([[User talk:Hipocrite|talk]]) 21:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270992 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270991 +++$+++ 270991 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.255581120E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, please put your comments in your own section: I've moved your latest from my section to yours, but I'm in a hurry, so you'll have to doublecheck that I did it correctly.   +++$+++ : Mattisse, please put your comments in your own section: I've moved your latest from my section to yours, but I'm in a hurry, so you'll have to doublecheck that I did it correctly.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270993 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270991 +++$+++ 270992 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.255581960E09 +++$+++ So who's going to move Giano's interpolation into Mattisse's statement? -- +++$+++ ::So who's going to move Giano's interpolation into Mattisse's statement? --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 21:46, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

270994 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.255582680E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I don't think anyone else agrees with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification&curid=22747419&diff=319889985&oldid=319889742 your idea that the mentoring page is only for yourself and your mentors]. While I want cut right down on the dog-piling, hostilities and downright irrelevances, there has to be a place for concerns to be raised. OK, in theory they could be raised at some sort of \"pending\" page, but then they'd have to be summarised at the mentoring page - and the person best placed to do that is the original poster. That's why some of us support a structure approach including a form, with sections for the original poster, the mentors and yourself - and IMO no other parties, because that's been where the muddles have arisen. I suggest other parties comment at a subpage which the mentors can review before making recommendations. -- +++$+++ Mattisse, I don't think anyone else agrees with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification&curid=22747419&diff=319889985&oldid=319889742 your idea that the mentoring page is only for yourself and your mentors]. While I want cut right down on the dog-piling, hostilities and downright irrelevances, there has to be a place for concerns to be raised. OK, in theory they could be raised at some sort of "pending" page, but then they'd have to be summarised at the mentoring page - and the person best placed to do that is the original poster. That's why some of us support a structure approach including a form, with sections for the original poster, the mentors and yourself - and IMO no other parties, because that's been where the muddles have arisen. I suggest other parties comment at a subpage which the mentors can review before making recommendations. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 21:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270995 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270994 +++$+++ 270994 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.255583520E09 +++$+++ There has been two issues to mentor, which the advisors\/mentors handled extremely well. And the joke sockpuppet incident, for which I was blocked for two weeks, longer that the abusive sockpuppeters at arbcom, as arbcom did not block anyone for long term abusive sockpuppetting. The only think that has not worked is the monitoring page. That is because it is a free-for-all. The mentoring process is working, in my opinion, but the monitoring page is not. There is no requirement that there even be a monitoring page. Dissatisfied editors with grievances can contact individual mentors\/advisers. The mentoring page was being used almost entirely for abuse, attacks, and bickering. The monitoring page caused  major stress on me, even though many of the posts were not about me but rather thoughts by uninvolved editors, or attacks on my mentors\/advisers.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :There has been two issues to mentor, which the advisors/mentors handled extremely well. And the joke sockpuppet incident, for which I was blocked for two weeks, longer that the abusive sockpuppeters at arbcom, as arbcom did not block anyone for long term abusive sockpuppetting. The only think that has not worked is the monitoring page. That is because it is a free-for-all. The mentoring process is working, in my opinion, but the monitoring page is not. There is no requirement that there even be a monitoring page. Dissatisfied editors with grievances can contact individual mentors/advisers. The mentoring page was being used almost entirely for abuse, attacks, and bickering. The monitoring page caused  major stress on me, even though many of the posts were not about me but rather thoughts by uninvolved editors, or attacks on my mentors/advisers.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270996 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270994 +++$+++ 270995 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.255584420E09 +++$+++ We need a central place for this to happen. For example if someone with a concern has to contact individual mentors and the chosen mentor is unavailable, the delay in response could be dangerous for you. -- +++$+++ ::We need a central place for this to happen. For example if someone with a concern has to contact individual mentors and the chosen mentor is unavailable, the delay in response could be dangerous for you. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 22:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270997 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270994 +++$+++ 270996 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.255584660E09 +++$+++ Exactly; notice how things spiraled today while no mentors were available.   +++$+++ ::: Exactly; notice how things spiraled today while no mentors were available.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:31, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270998 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270994 +++$+++ 270997 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.255585140E09 +++$+++ I don't see how. If the page had not been locked down by an involved admin, there would not have been a problem. Even with the page locked down, there did not need to be a problem. I went to AN\/I because I really believed that a user, in the normal course of events, could be forbidden from editing his own userpage. If I was wrong about that, I could have be told that I was wrong. There was no need to escalate this into a major situation.  That is not a major incident and did not need to be addressed immediately.  When I did something obviously wrong I was blocked. Other than the recent uproar caused by the multiple postings across forums by some editors, I have not engaged in a pattern of casting aspersions and personal attacks. I get along fine with 99.9999 percent of the editors on Wikipedia. If this is the nature of a major emergency on Wikipedia, then I have to say, \"Yeah, it is just a website.\"  Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ ::::I don't see how. If the page had not been locked down by an involved admin, there would not have been a problem. Even with the page locked down, there did not need to be a problem. I went to AN/I because I really believed that a user, in the normal course of events, could be forbidden from editing his own userpage. If I was wrong about that, I could have be told that I was wrong. There was no need to escalate this into a major situation.  That is not a major incident and did not need to be addressed immediately.  When I did something obviously wrong I was blocked. Other than the recent uproar caused by the multiple postings across forums by some editors, I have not engaged in a pattern of casting aspersions and personal attacks. I get along fine with 99.9999 percent of the editors on Wikipedia. If this is the nature of a major emergency on Wikipedia, then I have to say, "Yeah, it is just a website."  Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:39, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
270999 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270994 +++$+++ 270998 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.255585440E09 +++$+++ Perhaps Moni did you a huge favor by locking down the page, as that prevented you from digging yourself in further given that no mentors were available?  That's what I saw.   +++$+++ ::::: Perhaps Moni did you a huge favor by locking down the page, as that prevented you from digging yourself in further given that no mentors were available?  That's what I saw.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:44, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
271000 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270994 +++$+++ 270999 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.255585800E09 +++$+++ I don't think so. Moni3's locked down version of the monitoring page omits all the progress we had made. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse\/Monitoring&oldid=319797906 See this version] I am not sure how the pared down version was chosen for lock down over the one with the mentors\/advisers suggestions for improvements. Thanks, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::::I don't think so. Moni3's locked down version of the monitoring page omits all the progress we had made. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse/Monitoring&oldid=319797906 See this version] I am not sure how the pared down version was chosen for lock down over the one with the mentors/advisers suggestions for improvements. Thanks, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
271001 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270994 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.255587540E09 +++$+++ Um, well you were the only one removing content from the page, so if something was \"stripped down\", how can Moni help it?  Please, when making statements like this, go back through the page and get them accurate.  Everything that you removed is now on the \"Editorial\" page that you created.   +++$+++ :::::::::: Um, well you were the only one removing content from the page, so if something was "stripped down", how can Moni help it?  Please, when making statements like this, go back through the page and get them accurate.  Everything that you removed is now on the "Editorial" page that you created.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
271002 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 270994 +++$+++ 271000 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.255585980E09 +++$+++ I very much agree with SandyG. One of the reasons I gave up on your mentorship was that I wasn't able to issue the short blocks you'd agreed to during the Arbcom case. -- +++$+++ :::::::I very much agree with SandyG. One of the reasons I gave up on your mentorship was that I wasn't able to issue the short blocks you'd agreed to during the Arbcom case. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 22:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

8852 +++$+++ Velella +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ 8852 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-09 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.307684880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I am however confused as to why Catholic Bishops should be or are considered notable. There is no mention in [[WP:Bio|notability guidelines]] and there seems to me nothing  in their role which would indicate that they should be treated in this way. Many Bishops perform their roles without gaining any notability except in their local area. If you can point me towards a policy or guideline on this I would be grateful. Thanks <span style=\"background-color:lightblue\">'''''&nbsp; +++$+++ Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I am however confused as to why Catholic Bishops should be or are considered notable. There is no mention in [[WP:Bio|notability guidelines]] and there seems to me nothing  in their role which would indicate that they should be treated in this way. Many Bishops perform their roles without gaining any notability except in their local area. If you can point me towards a policy or guideline on this I would be grateful. Thanks <span style="background-color:lightblue">'''''&nbsp;[[User:Velella|Velella]]&nbsp;'''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue">&nbsp;<sup>''[[User talk:Velella|Velella]] Talk ''</sup>&nbsp;</span> 22:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
8853 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ 8852 +++$+++ 8852 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.307707680E09 +++$+++ They are known nationally as the highest in their field per [[WP:ANYBIO]] point #2. Right now I'm writing an article on a church on the National Register of Historic Places and I mention many of the [[Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Milwaukee#Diocesan bishops|bishops]] in the article. Since all bishops in world have the highest positions in their field, many independent reliable sources will exist for all bishops. Lots of readers are interested in the history and structure of major religions - so authors write books about it. If I ever found a bishop in any major religion come up at AFD, I would automatically give it a keep comment since I think they are inherently notable. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :They are known nationally as the highest in their field per [[WP:ANYBIO]] point #2. Right now I'm writing an article on a church on the National Register of Historic Places and I mention many of the [[Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Milwaukee#Diocesan bishops|bishops]] in the article. Since all bishops in world have the highest positions in their field, many independent reliable sources will exist for all bishops. Lots of readers are interested in the history and structure of major religions - so authors write books about it. If I ever found a bishop in any major religion come up at AFD, I would automatically give it a keep comment since I think they are inherently notable. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 05:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
8854 +++$+++ Velella +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ 8852 +++$+++ 8853 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.308009000E09 +++$+++ I think I could make a cogent case that [[Archbishop]]s are the  highest positions in their field. To date I can find no compelling policy that confirms any special position for Bishops in Wikipedia unless they have established notability; as with all other biographies. <span style=\"background-color:lightblue\">'''''&nbsp; +++$+++ ::I think I could make a cogent case that [[Archbishop]]s are the  highest positions in their field. To date I can find no compelling policy that confirms any special position for Bishops in Wikipedia unless they have established notability; as with all other biographies. <span style="background-color:lightblue">'''''&nbsp;[[User:Velella|Velella]]&nbsp;'''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue">&nbsp;<sup>''[[User talk:Velella|Velella]] Talk ''</sup>&nbsp;</span> 16:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

533141 +++$+++ Andretalierciom +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533141 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-24 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.206410280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Andretalierciom|Andretalierciom]] ([[User talk:Andretalierciom|talk]]) 18:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
533142 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533141 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.206410940E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Now, what you do is wait for comments of administrators monitoring the page and they will present there opinions. You can also go in a discussion there. --''' +++$+++ :: You're welcome. Now, what you do is wait for comments of administrators monitoring the page and they will present there opinions. You can also go in a discussion there. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:09, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

533144 +++$+++ Bardin +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533144 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-25 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.206435960E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I noticed you were the one who deleted the [[Tales, Ale and Fire (album)]] by Lemuria after I put up the deletion proposal. For some reason though the talk page for the article still exists: [[Talk:Tales, Ale and Fire (album)]]. Could you delete it as well? While you're at it, maybe speedy delete the now empty [[:Category:Lemuria albums]] too. -- +++$+++ Hi there. I noticed you were the one who deleted the [[Tales, Ale and Fire (album)]] by Lemuria after I put up the deletion proposal. For some reason though the talk page for the article still exists: [[Talk:Tales, Ale and Fire (album)]]. Could you delete it as well? While you're at it, maybe speedy delete the now empty [[:Category:Lemuria albums]] too. --[[User:Bardin|Bardin]] ([[User talk:Bardin|talk]]) 02:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
533145 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533144 +++$+++ 533144 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.206498420E09 +++$+++ Done. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Done. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

8857 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ 8857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-17 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.308367080E09 +++$+++ It was recently suggested that [[Wikipedia:WikiProject US State Legislatures|WikiProject US State Legislatures]] might be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by [[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States|WikiProject United States]]. I have started a discussion on the projects talk page soliciting the opinions of the members of the project if this project would be interested in being supported by WikiProject United States. Please feel free to comment on your opinions about this suggestion. -- +++$+++ It was recently suggested that [[Wikipedia:WikiProject US State Legislatures|WikiProject US State Legislatures]] might be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by [[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States|WikiProject United States]]. I have started a discussion on the projects talk page soliciting the opinions of the members of the project if this project would be interested in being supported by WikiProject United States. Please feel free to comment on your opinions about this suggestion. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 20:18, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
8858 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ 8857 +++$+++ 8857 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308781320E09 +++$+++ Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives\u2014which houses some of America's most important historical documents\u2014is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/NARA\/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]].  +++$+++ :Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]]. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

533146 +++$+++ Balloonman +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-25 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.206451860E09 +++$+++ But now that I am here, I have another question for you... one of my coachees stumbled across two Slovene related AFDs.  It appears to me that a debate from Slovene Wikipedia has crossed boundaries to the Eng Wikipedia.  As I can't read the sources or discussions elsewhere, I was wondering if you could take a look at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Festival of New Songs]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Zeus (band)]] and give us your unique insight on these articles and the debates that are occuring between the two users? +++$+++ But now that I am here, I have another question for you... one of my coachees stumbled across two Slovene related AFDs.  It appears to me that a debate from Slovene Wikipedia has crossed boundaries to the Eng Wikipedia.  As I can't read the sources or discussions elsewhere, I was wondering if you could take a look at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Festival of New Songs]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeus (band)]] and give us your unique insight on these articles and the debates that are occuring between the two users?[[User:Balloonman|Balloonman]] ([[User talk:Balloonman|talk]]) 06:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
533147 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533146 +++$+++ 533146 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.206498420E09 +++$+++ Ok, I'll have a look at the AfD cases and contact [[User:Master_son]]. Probably today. I hope I can help. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, I'll have a look at the AfD cases and contact [[User:Master_son]]. Probably today. I hope I can help. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
533148 +++$+++ Balloonman +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533146 +++$+++ 533147 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.206498780E09 +++$+++ Thanks, your input into those AfD's will be invaluable as you can better assess the articles in question. +++$+++ ::Thanks, your input into those AfD's will be invaluable as you can better assess the articles in question.[[User:Balloonman|Balloonman]] ([[User talk:Balloonman|talk]]) 19:33, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

271003 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271003 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-14 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.255587360E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, you said you were too tired to locate diffs, yet you continue editing, and still haven't struck this deragotory comment from AN\/I:  \"Moni3 has no right to lock down my user page because SandyGeorgia is not getting her way\".  It doesn't appear that you are too tired to locate it, as you've already been to AN\/I where you *altered* a comment rather than striking it.  Moni did you a favor by preventing you from making your situation worse while your mentors were absent, and you can read NYB's comments on the arb, as well as Durova's.  You've done this to yourself, but you still have a chance to salvage what you've done; rather than spending time arguing the situation here on your talk, don't you think your time would be better spent, and you could make a better case to the arbs by striking your derogatory comments at AN\/I, and going through this (your) talk page to do the same?   +++$+++ Mattisse, you said you were too tired to locate diffs, yet you continue editing, and still haven't struck this deragotory comment from AN/I:  "Moni3 has no right to lock down my user page because SandyGeorgia is not getting her way".  It doesn't appear that you are too tired to locate it, as you've already been to AN/I where you *altered* a comment rather than striking it.  Moni did you a favor by preventing you from making your situation worse while your mentors were absent, and you can read NYB's comments on the arb, as well as Durova's.  You've done this to yourself, but you still have a chance to salvage what you've done; rather than spending time arguing the situation here on your talk, don't you think your time would be better spent, and you could make a better case to the arbs by striking your derogatory comments at AN/I, and going through this (your) talk page to do the same?  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:16, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
271004 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271003 +++$+++ 271003 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.255589220E09 +++$+++ I apologize for inferring that Moni3 removed material. When you introduced negative comments[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse\/Monitoring&oldid=319824461], the constructive atmosphere of the page once again became polluted. I sought to remove you comments to an alternative page, because frankly they made further constructive work very difficult. That was the problem before and the problem we agreed shouild be eliminated or controlled by a rigid structure. Because I became caught in a series of unfathomable (at the time) edit conflicts, I was caught in the middle when the page was locked down to prevent me from controlling the material on my monitoring work page. To me, it was either remove the comments and continue the constructive work, or allow them to stay and see the page devolve into bickering and ugliness again. I apologize if I implied that you did anything other than add the unhelpful comments and alter the constructive mood of the page and contribute to the confusing edit conflicts. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ *I apologize for inferring that Moni3 removed material. When you introduced negative comments[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse/Monitoring&oldid=319824461], the constructive atmosphere of the page once again became polluted. I sought to remove you comments to an alternative page, because frankly they made further constructive work very difficult. That was the problem before and the problem we agreed shouild be eliminated or controlled by a rigid structure. Because I became caught in a series of unfathomable (at the time) edit conflicts, I was caught in the middle when the page was locked down to prevent me from controlling the material on my monitoring work page. To me, it was either remove the comments and continue the constructive work, or allow them to stay and see the page devolve into bickering and ugliness again. I apologize if I implied that you did anything other than add the unhelpful comments and alter the constructive mood of the page and contribute to the confusing edit conflicts. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:47, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
271005 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271003 +++$+++ 271003 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.255600740E09 +++$+++ # It is also completely inaccurate for you to continue saying that \"I was caught in the middle when the page was locked down to prevent me from controlling the material on my monitoring work page.\"  You had already removed all the material yourself; you failed to move it correctly to the other page, or to the correct sections.  But you ''did'' control the material on your page; you removed it all.  No one else had anything to do with that.  What do you mean when you say you were \"prevented\" from controlling the material?  What else were you intending to do?  That is why I say Moni did you a favor, as you weren't apparently aware of what you were creating, and were digging yourself in, going against the consensus of your mentors that other editors could post to the Monitoring page, and your example of bringing other editors' posts to that page from the day before.   +++$+++ :# It is also completely inaccurate for you to continue saying that "I was caught in the middle when the page was locked down to prevent me from controlling the material on my monitoring work page."  You had already removed all the material yourself; you failed to move it correctly to the other page, or to the correct sections.  But you ''did'' control the material on your page; you removed it all.  No one else had anything to do with that.  What do you mean when you say you were "prevented" from controlling the material?  What else were you intending to do?  That is why I say Moni did you a favor, as you weren't apparently aware of what you were creating, and were digging yourself in, going against the consensus of your mentors that other editors could post to the Monitoring page, and your example of bringing other editors' posts to that page from the day before.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271006 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271003 +++$+++ 271003 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.255600320E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, you seem to hold many entrenched inaccurate views about other editors and their motives; until and unless you learn to read diffs and page histories and back your statements with diffs, it would be wise to refrain from making derogatory statements about your ''beliefs'' about other editors.  You could have avoided this entire incident by 1) waiting for and talking with your mentors before moving commentary, and 2) immediately striking your derogatory statements from AN\/I, which you have yet to do.  Enough of Wiki's finest editors are spending inordinate amounts of time sorting these unnecessary messes, and it's time for you to start helping yourself, so they can do productive things like write articles, fight vandals, and review articles. The monitoring page was doing fine until you unilaterally started moving material, leading to a large number of editors now spending an entire day sorting the fallout.   +++$+++ : Mattisse, you seem to hold many entrenched inaccurate views about other editors and their motives; until and unless you learn to read diffs and page histories and back your statements with diffs, it would be wise to refrain from making derogatory statements about your ''beliefs'' about other editors.  You could have avoided this entire incident by 1) waiting for and talking with your mentors before moving commentary, and 2) immediately striking your derogatory statements from AN/I, which you have yet to do.  Enough of Wiki's finest editors are spending inordinate amounts of time sorting these unnecessary messes, and it's time for you to start helping yourself, so they can do productive things like write articles, fight vandals, and review articles. The monitoring page was doing fine until you unilaterally started moving material, leading to a large number of editors now spending an entire day sorting the fallout.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

533150 +++$+++ Andretalierciom +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-25 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.206489180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Andretalierciom|Andretalierciom]] ([[User talk:Andretalierciom|talk]]) 16:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
533151 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533150 +++$+++ 533150 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.206498420E09 +++$+++ Take it easy, the case is not closed yet ;-) After a couple of days, when the case closes, if the final result is reinsert, the closing admin will recreate the article and potentially put it to AfD or keep it as such. No need to hurry. --''' +++$+++ : Take it easy, the case is not closed yet ;-) After a couple of days, when the case closes, if the final result is reinsert, the closing admin will recreate the article and potentially put it to AfD or keep it as such. No need to hurry. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

8863 +++$+++ TheFEARgod +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-30 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.167526920E09 +++$+++ You should change to War in Somalia 2006 on your battles maps, now. -- +++$+++ You should change to War in Somalia 2006 on your battles maps, now. --[[User:TheFEARgod|<font color="#003399">The'''FE'''</font><font color="red">'''AR'''god</font>]] ([[User talk:TheFEARgod|'''Ч''']]) 17:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
8864 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8863 +++$+++ 8863 +++$+++ 2006-12-30 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.167531840E09 +++$+++ I understand your point of view, yet I maintain the war is still primarily a [[civil war]], fought between the ICU, the TFG, Puntland, and Galmudug, etc., with the foreign intervention of Ethiopia (and others). The media still refer to it as a civil war as well, such as this Dec 24, 2006 reference in the [[Boston Globe]]: [http:\/\/www.boston.com\/news\/globe\/editorial_opinion\/editorials\/articles\/2006\/12\/24\/the_surrogate_war_in_somalia\/ The surrogate war in Somalia] -- +++$+++ :I understand your point of view, yet I maintain the war is still primarily a [[civil war]], fought between the ICU, the TFG, Puntland, and Galmudug, etc., with the foreign intervention of Ethiopia (and others). The media still refer to it as a civil war as well, such as this Dec 24, 2006 reference in the [[Boston Globe]]: [http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2006/12/24/the_surrogate_war_in_somalia/ The surrogate war in Somalia] --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 18:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

438384 +++$+++ Snek01 +++$+++ JoJan +++$+++ 438384 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-19 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.305850500E09 +++$+++ can be applied. -- +++$+++ can be applied. --[[User:Snek01|Snek01]] ([[User talk:Snek01|talk]]) 17:15, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
438385 +++$+++ JoJan +++$+++ JoJan +++$+++ 438384 +++$+++ 438384 +++$+++ 2011-05-19 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.305851220E09 +++$+++ Refused. There is already a disambiguation page for [[Stanleya]].   +++$+++ : Refused. There is already a disambiguation page for [[Stanleya]].  [[User:JoJan|JoJan]] ([[User talk:JoJan#top|talk]]) 17:27, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

8868 +++$+++ Pethr +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8868 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-04 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.167913860E09 +++$+++ Hi Petercorless, first of, you're doing some amazing work on Wikipedia, thank you! However, it would be very helpful if you considered use of guidelines on citing sources included in [[WP:CITE]]. It's not compulsory but sources without retrieved on, author, date of publishing, etc. are generally considered invalid. F.e., if the your articles are to be considered for [[WP:FAC]] someone will have to add all the information you omitted, which will be much more difficult to do. Please consider using source citation templates; see [[Wikipedia:Template_messages\/Sources_of_articles#Citations_of_generic_sources]]. Also consider providing edit summaries on your edits as it's helpful for other editors and may be use preview more often than submit as you are flooding wikipedia' database with edits often just one-three minutes one from another. Thank you.-- +++$+++ Hi Petercorless, first of, you're doing some amazing work on Wikipedia, thank you! However, it would be very helpful if you considered use of guidelines on citing sources included in [[WP:CITE]]. It's not compulsory but sources without retrieved on, author, date of publishing, etc. are generally considered invalid. F.e., if the your articles are to be considered for [[WP:FAC]] someone will have to add all the information you omitted, which will be much more difficult to do. Please consider using source citation templates; see [[Wikipedia:Template_messages/Sources_of_articles#Citations_of_generic_sources]]. Also consider providing edit summaries on your edits as it's helpful for other editors and may be use preview more often than submit as you are flooding wikipedia' database with edits often just one-three minutes one from another. Thank you.--[[User:Pethr|Pethr]] 04:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
8869 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8868 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.167914460E09 +++$+++ Understood. Yes. Since the \"urgency\" of the Somalia war is winding down, I can take more time to read through the Wiki guidelines and put in the more formal information for references. I've been doing it on a few articles, but I had not been all-too-thorough yet. On the flip side, I am already going in at some places cleaning up those even-more glib links and poorly-formed external refs by others left long before me. As far as using \"preview\" -- I do. However, there are a number of technical issues I've been having, including losing sessions (particularly bad today), which require me to save early and often. Otherwise, the update gets \"lost\" when I try to submit it. I've also found a lot of my updates are iterative as I swap data around from section to section. There's just no other way to do that than a few submissions at a go. I'll try to do better with the change notes. -- +++$+++ ::Understood. Yes. Since the "urgency" of the Somalia war is winding down, I can take more time to read through the Wiki guidelines and put in the more formal information for references. I've been doing it on a few articles, but I had not been all-too-thorough yet. On the flip side, I am already going in at some places cleaning up those even-more glib links and poorly-formed external refs by others left long before me. As far as using "preview" -- I do. However, there are a number of technical issues I've been having, including losing sessions (particularly bad today), which require me to save early and often. Otherwise, the update gets "lost" when I try to submit it. I've also found a lot of my updates are iterative as I swap data around from section to section. There's just no other way to do that than a few submissions at a go. I'll try to do better with the change notes. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 04:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
8870 +++$+++ Pethr +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8868 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.167915720E09 +++$+++ Thank you for reply. Try hitting back buttom in your browser if your session is aborted or if you receive some kind of error from the server. It works for me in Safari\/Firefox without exception. Hope it helps.-- +++$+++ ::Thank you for reply. Try hitting back buttom in your browser if your session is aborted or if you receive some kind of error from the server. It works for me in Safari/Firefox without exception. Hope it helps.--[[User:Pethr|Pethr]] 05:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
8871 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8868 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.167915780E09 +++$+++ Good tip, which I did try, and it didn't work. Restarting the browser also did not seem to clear it up. However, by this evening, I'm back to mostly normal. -- +++$+++ :::Good tip, which I did try, and it didn't work. Restarting the browser also did not seem to clear it up. However, by this evening, I'm back to mostly normal. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 05:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
8872 +++$+++ Pethr +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8868 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.167916500E09 +++$+++ And what exactly is happening? What error are you seeing? It's unusual to say the least, modern browsers remember those things. I assume you're a mac user, I like using simple apps such as TextEdit for editing Wikipedia, it adds one copy and paste to the process but it can be more comfortable especially if you have enough screen real estate to accommodate browser and editor side by side.-- +++$+++ ::::And what exactly is happening? What error are you seeing? It's unusual to say the least, modern browsers remember those things. I assume you're a mac user, I like using simple apps such as TextEdit for editing Wikipedia, it adds one copy and paste to the process but it can be more comfortable especially if you have enough screen real estate to accommodate browser and editor side by side.--[[User:Pethr|Pethr]] 05:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
8873 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8868 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.167916800E09 +++$+++ I'd be editing, and suddenly I was unable to save. It would tell me I had lost my session. Going back and trying to re-submit would tell me I needed to log in again. Have to log out, then log in again, then go back to the page I was editing. I'd also have to copy the text buffer of the article, and paste it once I got back in and ready to edit. It was not a good time. It happened about 20 times today. It finally cleared up a few hours ago. -- +++$+++ :::::I'd be editing, and suddenly I was unable to save. It would tell me I had lost my session. Going back and trying to re-submit would tell me I needed to log in again. Have to log out, then log in again, then go back to the page I was editing. I'd also have to copy the text buffer of the article, and paste it once I got back in and ready to edit. It was not a good time. It happened about 20 times today. It finally cleared up a few hours ago. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 05:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
8874 +++$+++ Pethr +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8868 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.167917880E09 +++$+++ It seems that your problem is descibed in [[Help:Logging in#Log in problems]] but I'd double check cookies settings (usually in privacy tab in prefs) first. External text editor also might help (as you don't lose your changes when the session ends unexpectedly. Hope you will solve this!-- +++$+++ ::::::It seems that your problem is descibed in [[Help:Logging in#Log in problems]] but I'd double check cookies settings (usually in privacy tab in prefs) first. External text editor also might help (as you don't lose your changes when the session ends unexpectedly. Hope you will solve this!--[[User:Pethr|Pethr]] 05:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

533158 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533158 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.206604140E09 +++$+++ Hi there Tone. In regards to this situation with Gooddays, you mentioned \"all the users reported and almost all the articles tagged are connected to Slovenia. Just a curious remark\". Have you had a major dispute with someone or encountered a user who has done this before? Because I find a number of things about this situation peculiar and I hear [[WP:DUCK|quacking]].  +++$+++ Hi there Tone. In regards to this situation with Gooddays, you mentioned "all the users reported and almost all the articles tagged are connected to Slovenia. Just a curious remark". Have you had a major dispute with someone or encountered a user who has done this before? Because I find a number of things about this situation peculiar and I hear [[WP:DUCK|quacking]]. [[User:Seraphim Whipp|<font color="FF69B4">Seraphim&hearts;</font>]]  [[User_talk:Seraphim Whipp|<sup><font color="black">Whipp</font></sup>]] 00:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
533159 +++$+++ Shoessss +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.206609660E09 +++$+++ Hello [[User:Tone|Tone]] I hope you do not mind, but asked [[User:DGG|DGG]] to take a look at the situation and advice.  Take care and remember spring is just right around the comer for you.  Here it has already arrived :-). <font face=\"Times New Roman\"> +++$+++ :::Hello [[User:Tone|Tone]] I hope you do not mind, but asked [[User:DGG|DGG]] to take a look at the situation and advice.  Take care and remember spring is just right around the comer for you.  Here it has already arrived :-). <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></font> 02:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
533160 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.206615420E09 +++$+++ I left some comments: see [[User talk:Shoessss]]. If Seraphim's question is relevant, please email me. ''' +++$+++ ::I left some comments: see [[User talk:Shoessss]]. If Seraphim's question is relevant, please email me. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 03:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
533161 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.206749580E09 +++$+++ I just blocked for 2 hrs for gaming the system--details of latest variations on his talk page.. Future blocks will be considerably  longer if it resumes (eg 31 hours). ''' +++$+++ ::I just blocked for 2 hrs for gaming the system--details of latest variations on his talk page.. Future blocks will be considerably  longer if it resumes (eg 31 hours). '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 17:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

271016 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-15 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.255590540E09 +++$+++ Clarifications requests are not usually the place for back and forth between editors.  In response to my comments you pose several questions.  The syntax makes it unclear whether the queries are directed to the arbitrators, or are rhetorical, or are for me.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification&diff=319913227&oldid=319910205]  Several months ago you asked that I cease posting to your user talk.  If today's questions are not directed at me, then feel free to blank this post and we can agree to disagree.  If you intended to initiate a dialog then let's continue it here.  I've been known to change my mind and revise opinions. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Clarifications requests are not usually the place for back and forth between editors.  In response to my comments you pose several questions.  The syntax makes it unclear whether the queries are directed to the arbitrators, or are rhetorical, or are for me.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification&diff=319913227&oldid=319910205]  Several months ago you asked that I cease posting to your user talk.  If today's questions are not directed at me, then feel free to blank this post and we can agree to disagree.  If you intended to initiate a dialog then let's continue it here.  I've been known to change my mind and revise opinions. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|326]]''</sup> 00:09, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271017 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271016 +++$+++ 271016 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.255591260E09 +++$+++ Frankly, I do not know what to think of you or how to respond. I am not sure what you expect of me here. I am sorry that editors see my advisers\/mentors as failures when they have been unfailingly informative to me. I certainly do not think they stint on criticism or give me a free ride. I would like to think that mentoring\/advising can work on Wikipedia, and that good editors like me, excellent editors like me who engage almost entirely in content work without criticism, can be driven from Wikipedia by old grudges, still carried. Other than the last 24 hours or so, when I have been under unstinting (and unnecessary) pressure, I think you will find very few \"mistakes\" that I have made, other than the joke sockpuppet thing. I am not a perfect human being, but I have given liberally and constructively to Wikipedia. I think there is no question that I am a net positive. And the fact that some hold grudges over time should not determine whether I am allowed to continue to contribute to the project or not. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Frankly, I do not know what to think of you or how to respond. I am not sure what you expect of me here. I am sorry that editors see my advisers/mentors as failures when they have been unfailingly informative to me. I certainly do not think they stint on criticism or give me a free ride. I would like to think that mentoring/advising can work on Wikipedia, and that good editors like me, excellent editors like me who engage almost entirely in content work without criticism, can be driven from Wikipedia by old grudges, still carried. Other than the last 24 hours or so, when I have been under unstinting (and unnecessary) pressure, I think you will find very few "mistakes" that I have made, other than the joke sockpuppet thing. I am not a perfect human being, but I have given liberally and constructively to Wikipedia. I think there is no question that I am a net positive. And the fact that some hold grudges over time should not determine whether I am allowed to continue to contribute to the project or not. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271018 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271016 +++$+++ 271017 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.255591620E09 +++$+++ Then we share some common ground: mentorship as an undertaking can be worthwhile; it does have successes.  Could it be possible that some of your critics are sincere (even if mistaken) and do not bear you a personal grudge? <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Then we share some common ground: mentorship as an undertaking can be worthwhile; it does have successes.  Could it be possible that some of your critics are sincere (even if mistaken) and do not bear you a personal grudge? <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|326]]''</sup> 00:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271019 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271016 +++$+++ 271018 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.255592460E09 +++$+++ Anything is possible. It is hard to understand when I have had no interaction with them at all outside the monitoring page today, do not edit the same places etc. What could the explanation be, do you think, besides old grudges? All I have been doing for a while is dyks and copy editing for a few trusted editors.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::Anything is possible. It is hard to understand when I have had no interaction with them at all outside the monitoring page today, do not edit the same places etc. What could the explanation be, do you think, besides old grudges? All I have been doing for a while is dyks and copy editing for a few trusted editors.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:41, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271020 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271016 +++$+++ 271019 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.255596120E09 +++$+++ Well, it's possible I may have been mistaken.  Your content contributions are very laudable.  The thing is, some people have wikiphilosophies that occasionally get mistaken for personal grudges.  It's best to think of [[WP:AGF]] as a checklist where bad faith is the final item after other reasonable possibilities are exhausted and opportunity for clarification has been provided.  That's much easier to say than to abide by, so feel free to nudge me when appropriate if I err.  There were basically three things in the last several months that caught my attention.  One was the socking--or joke account if you'd rather call it that--which prompted two reactions.  My inner teenager quietly found it hilarious, but the 41-year-old I actually am cringed for your sake.  Really, ''[[tu quoque]]'' isn't a good answer to anything.  Better to take the high road.  Now in terms of joke accounts you may or may not realize this, but my own alternate account (who pretends to be a troll but really strives to be very uncontroversial) did have an unexpected run-in with you while he tried as hard as he could to be a good editor.  My little sockpuppet [[User:Hamlet,_Prince_of_Trollmark]] was trying for a triple crown.  His interests are very specialized: trolls and trolling (broadly defined), hosiery, and parodies of Hamlet.  He's gotten three featured pictures on the themes \"trolling\" (from a Currier and Ives print of fishing), \"sock\" (from a hosiery factory) and \"puppet\" (from a burlesque poster).  Found a company called [[Gold Toe Brands]] that didn't have an article yet and wrote something for it, yet it had trouble passing DYK review.  Now Hamlet has a standing offer to retire if he actually offends anyone.  So speak now if you object.  He was thinking of raising either a [[The Producer|Gilligan's Island episode]] or the [[Pets.com]] article to GA before he ran into experienced and prolific ''you'' at DYK nominees.  <small>If you don't mind his existence he'd be delighted because an important Tom Stoppard play called ''[[Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead]]'' could really use improvement.<\/small>  Then--getting back to you--the events of the last day.  I really want to see you doing all that good work that you do without the conflicts.  Sometimes, in my book, that means saying 'no'.  But not everyone who says 'no' is an enemy.  In fact, one of the most effective ways to be someone's enemy is to say 'yes' every time a person wants to hear it.  You know how that goes? <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::Well, it's possible I may have been mistaken.  Your content contributions are very laudable.  The thing is, some people have wikiphilosophies that occasionally get mistaken for personal grudges.  It's best to think of [[WP:AGF]] as a checklist where bad faith is the final item after other reasonable possibilities are exhausted and opportunity for clarification has been provided.  That's much easier to say than to abide by, so feel free to nudge me when appropriate if I err.  There were basically three things in the last several months that caught my attention.  One was the socking--or joke account if you'd rather call it that--which prompted two reactions.  My inner teenager quietly found it hilarious, but the 41-year-old I actually am cringed for your sake.  Really, ''[[tu quoque]]'' isn't a good answer to anything.  Better to take the high road.  Now in terms of joke accounts you may or may not realize this, but my own alternate account (who pretends to be a troll but really strives to be very uncontroversial) did have an unexpected run-in with you while he tried as hard as he could to be a good editor.  My little sockpuppet [[User:Hamlet,_Prince_of_Trollmark]] was trying for a triple crown.  His interests are very specialized: trolls and trolling (broadly defined), hosiery, and parodies of Hamlet.  He's gotten three featured pictures on the themes "trolling" (from a Currier and Ives print of fishing), "sock" (from a hosiery factory) and "puppet" (from a burlesque poster).  Found a company called [[Gold Toe Brands]] that didn't have an article yet and wrote something for it, yet it had trouble passing DYK review.  Now Hamlet has a standing offer to retire if he actually offends anyone.  So speak now if you object.  He was thinking of raising either a [[The Producer|Gilligan's Island episode]] or the [[Pets.com]] article to GA before he ran into experienced and prolific ''you'' at DYK nominees.  <small>If you don't mind his existence he'd be delighted because an important Tom Stoppard play called ''[[Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead]]'' could really use improvement.</small>  Then--getting back to you--the events of the last day.  I really want to see you doing all that good work that you do without the conflicts.  Sometimes, in my book, that means saying 'no'.  But not everyone who says 'no' is an enemy.  In fact, one of the most effective ways to be someone's enemy is to say 'yes' every time a person wants to hear it.  You know how that goes? <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|326]]''</sup> 01:42, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271021 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271016 +++$+++ 271020 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.255596600E09 +++$+++ I don't understand what you are saying. Is it that I did something wrong at dyk? I am even more careful now about verifying hooks. I avoid most and only verify those that are unquestionable. I no longer add comments and suggest very few alternative hooks. I am quite willing to give up verifying hooks entirely, as it is not fun but rather anxiety provoking.  Is that what you are suggesting? I only do it out of a sense of obligation because I have so many dyks myself, so I am quite willing to give up any further involvement, other than entering hooks for consideration. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::I don't understand what you are saying. Is it that I did something wrong at dyk? I am even more careful now about verifying hooks. I avoid most and only verify those that are unquestionable. I no longer add comments and suggest very few alternative hooks. I am quite willing to give up verifying hooks entirely, as it is not fun but rather anxiety provoking.  Is that what you are suggesting? I only do it out of a sense of obligation because I have so many dyks myself, so I am quite willing to give up any further involvement, other than entering hooks for consideration. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271022 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271016 +++$+++ 271021 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.255597500E09 +++$+++ (ec'd, saw the words 'rather anxiety provoking' added (but not much else) and willing to lay off upon request) Well, the general sense is that one incident is a one-off, two raises an antenna, and three is a pattern. The subtext seemed to be that the article might be getting held to a higher standard than others because the DYK might have been construed as promotional. Actually that hook was nearly the only interesting thing about the topic. I was on the fence about whether to outright say to you that it was my other account, but it's stated so prominently on the userpage that specific comment didn't seem necessary. Now consider for a moment if it had really been a new editor. Yes, you made me gunshy about using that account (which I had created because I was near burnout) and although he lingered a little bit he hasn't actually done very much in months. Wanted to keep him fun and productive. What if it had been an editor who was really new? Do you kind of see the concern? Taken together with your previous block of 2 September 2006, and your very pointy joke account while your conduct was under scrutiny, and the edit war within the last day--can you see how someone who mostly observes from a distance may think ''better a short ban than a long one''? I may be wrong in that. But I don't want to see a long departure and I worry that may otherwise happen down the road. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::::(ec'd, saw the words 'rather anxiety provoking' added (but not much else) and willing to lay off upon request) Well, the general sense is that one incident is a one-off, two raises an antenna, and three is a pattern. The subtext seemed to be that the article might be getting held to a higher standard than others because the DYK might have been construed as promotional. Actually that hook was nearly the only interesting thing about the topic. I was on the fence about whether to outright say to you that it was my other account, but it's stated so prominently on the userpage that specific comment didn't seem necessary. Now consider for a moment if it had really been a new editor. Yes, you made me gunshy about using that account (which I had created because I was near burnout) and although he lingered a little bit he hasn't actually done very much in months. Wanted to keep him fun and productive. What if it had been an editor who was really new? Do you kind of see the concern? Taken together with your previous block of 2 September 2006, and your very pointy joke account while your conduct was under scrutiny, and the edit war within the last day--can you see how someone who mostly observes from a distance may think ''better a short ban than a long one''? I may be wrong in that. But I don't want to see a long departure and I worry that may otherwise happen down the road. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|326]]''</sup> 02:05, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

533162 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533162 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-28 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.206762420E09 +++$+++ I've archived the AN thread for trolling. I just wish I could do something more about it, but [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Sceptre 3|people hate me for not being cheery enough...]] create another thread about ''him'' if he continues. ''' +++$+++ I've archived the AN thread for trolling. I just wish I could do something more about it, but [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Sceptre 3|people hate me for not being cheery enough...]] create another thread about ''him'' if he continues. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 20:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
533163 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533162 +++$+++ 533162 +++$+++ 2008-03-29 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.206776520E09 +++$+++ I've created [[WP:AN#Gooddays, part 2|a thread]] about his behaviour on AN, your comments are appreciated. ''' +++$+++ :I've created [[WP:AN#Gooddays, part 2|a thread]] about his behaviour on AN, your comments are appreciated. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 00:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

8875 +++$+++ Aiden +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-04 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.167945960E09 +++$+++ I never said they weren't involved. I merely said the source provided next to their listing under 'combatants' makes no such claim. It states merely that the US gives 'tacit approval' to Ethiopia's military support for the TFG. Thus, it is wholly inaccurate and mis-representative to use it as a reference claiming the US is a 'combatant'. Further, if are not combatants, as you readily admit, why would they be listed under the 'combatants' section of the campaign box? \u2014 +++$+++ I never said they weren't involved. I merely said the source provided next to their listing under 'combatants' makes no such claim. It states merely that the US gives 'tacit approval' to Ethiopia's military support for the TFG. Thus, it is wholly inaccurate and mis-representative to use it as a reference claiming the US is a 'combatant'. Further, if are not combatants, as you readily admit, why would they be listed under the 'combatants' section of the campaign box? —[[User:Aiden|<font color="077cd0">'''Aiden'''</font>]] 13:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
8876 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8875 +++$+++ 8875 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.167946140E09 +++$+++ Check the reference I made, which shows the USN is indeed patrolling off the coast, and has committed to trapping escaping Jihadists. I mentioned they were on \"Maritime Patrol,\" a form of combat support, though they are not direct combatants in the land combat. -- +++$+++ :Check the reference I made, which shows the USN is indeed patrolling off the coast, and has committed to trapping escaping Jihadists. I mentioned they were on "Maritime Patrol," a form of combat support, though they are not direct combatants in the land combat. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 13:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

533164 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-29 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.206827700E09 +++$+++ '''Tone, I want to commend you''' for your patient work in reverting all of the nonsense that this user & his sockpuppets have been adding. ''' +++$+++ '''Tone, I want to commend you''' for your patient work in reverting all of the nonsense that this user & his sockpuppets have been adding. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 14:55, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
533165 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533164 +++$+++ 533164 +++$+++ 2008-03-29 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.206827820E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Well, someone has to do it and despite these edits were provocative, this will lead to better sourcing of several articles. --''' +++$+++ : Thanks. Well, someone has to do it and despite these edits were provocative, this will lead to better sourcing of several articles. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

8877 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8877 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.168116540E09 +++$+++ To say that his successor is the incumbent is false; ''he'' is the incumbent &mdash; he doesn't have a successor. -- +++$+++ To say that his successor is the incumbent is false; ''he'' is the incumbent &mdash; he doesn't have a successor. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 12:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
8878 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8877 +++$+++ 8877 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.168116600E09 +++$+++ Eh... thanks. I didn't write that. And I agree. -- +++$+++ :Eh... thanks. I didn't write that. And I agree. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 12:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
8879 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8877 +++$+++ 8878 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.168118820E09 +++$+++ Sorry, of course you didn't &mdash; I misread the History.  -- +++$+++ ::Sorry, of course you didn't &mdash; I misread the History.  --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 13:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
8880 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8877 +++$+++ 8879 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.168120440E09 +++$+++ Not a worry. It's taken care of. -- +++$+++ ::: Not a worry. It's taken care of. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 13:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

271023 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-15 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.255598940E09 +++$+++ Per [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&curid=10924019&diff=319940815&oldid=319938661 this post], do you interpret this thread as an attack?  I don't mean to personally attack you. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&curid=10924019&diff=319940815&oldid=319938661 this post], do you interpret this thread as an attack?  I don't mean to personally attack you. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|326]]''</sup> 02:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271024 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271023 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.255637340E09 +++$+++ I cannot make sense out of these posts. Could you explain what is being meant here? Could you give diffs so that I would know what on earth this refers to? Are you saying that you have a joke account and I did something bad to that joke account in dyk? I can't follow what you are saying. Can you clearly explain exactly what I did in that situation that was wrong? I assure you that if I ever knew a dyk was by a sockpuppet, I would skip it and let someone else deal with it. At the most, I would ask Art LaPella was to do.   Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :*I cannot make sense out of these posts. Could you explain what is being meant here? Could you give diffs so that I would know what on earth this refers to? Are you saying that you have a joke account and I did something bad to that joke account in dyk? I can't follow what you are saying. Can you clearly explain exactly what I did in that situation that was wrong? I assure you that if I ever knew a dyk was by a sockpuppet, I would skip it and let someone else deal with it. At the most, I would ask Art LaPella was to do.   Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:09, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271025 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271023 +++$+++ 271023 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.255611120E09 +++$+++ Sorry for butting in, but this discussion seems to have got lost its way. [[User:Durova|Durova]], on the basis of your comments here I have no doubt about your good faith here. But your comments after the first have become longer and unfocussed. Perhaps you're trying to be diplomatic, but the result appears to be confusion. It might help if you return to your original point, about Mattisse's [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification&diff=319913227&oldid=319910205 comment] at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification]]. What are you you clear up? -- +++$+++ :Sorry for butting in, but this discussion seems to have got lost its way. [[User:Durova|Durova]], on the basis of your comments here I have no doubt about your good faith here. But your comments after the first have become longer and unfocussed. Perhaps you're trying to be diplomatic, but the result appears to be confusion. It might help if you return to your original point, about Mattisse's [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification&diff=319913227&oldid=319910205 comment] at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification]]. What are you you clear up? --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 05:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

8881 +++$+++ Wandalstouring +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.168828860E09 +++$+++ Would you be interested in joining the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military_history\/African military history task force|African military history task force]]?  +++$+++ Would you be interested in joining the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military_history/African military history task force|African military history task force]]? [[User:Wandalstouring|Wandalstouring]] 18:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
8882 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8881 +++$+++ 8881 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.168835280E09 +++$+++ Done! -- +++$+++ :Done! --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 20:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

271026 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271026 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-14 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.255573260E09 +++$+++ This is the new page for editors who are not my mentors\/advisers to make editorial comments on: [[User talk:Mattisse\/Monitoring\/Editorial comments]]. Please watch list this page. However, I would prefer that dissatisfied editors contact a mentor\/adviser individual, to prevent a battleground or attack mentality from developing on that page. Please let me know if you object to this. Thanks! Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ This is the new page for editors who are not my mentors/advisers to make editorial comments on: [[User talk:Mattisse/Monitoring/Editorial comments]]. Please watch list this page. However, I would prefer that dissatisfied editors contact a mentor/adviser individual, to prevent a battleground or attack mentality from developing on that page. Please let me know if you object to this. Thanks! Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:21, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
271027 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271026 +++$+++ 271026 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.255653480E09 +++$+++ I'm willing to respond to alerts about your behaviour, and to discuss with the other advisors the best course of action. And I will communicate with those who are impacted by your behaviour, and who wish to discuss the matter with me. And I will also respond to reasonable requests from people who might have an interest (members of ArbCom spring to mind) or who have a known history with you. But I'm not sure what benefit will be gained by my watching (and reading!) a side-discussion. Could you explain why I might need to watch that page? <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :I'm willing to respond to alerts about your behaviour, and to discuss with the other advisors the best course of action. And I will communicate with those who are impacted by your behaviour, and who wish to discuss the matter with me. And I will also respond to reasonable requests from people who might have an interest (members of ArbCom spring to mind) or who have a known history with you. But I'm not sure what benefit will be gained by my watching (and reading!) a side-discussion. Could you explain why I might need to watch that page? <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 17:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271028 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271026 +++$+++ 271027 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.255654260E09 +++$+++ That should be reworked with my mentors\/advisers. At the time, I was trying to move all the lengthy posts, discussion between editors who were not my mentors\/advisers off the monitoring page so that I and my mentors\/advisers could reasonably work on a complaint format free from attacks and the disruptive free-for-all that was occurring on the monitoring page. I felt the monitoring page had become useless. However, apparently I went about this the wrong way. So, I am looking for input on how to handle this. Meanwhile, at least the arbitration clarification request is siphoning  off all the comments that would have gone on that page, so that is a blessing, and discussion is progressing as to a complaint form.  What do you think I should do?  Regard, \u2014 +++$+++ ::That should be reworked with my mentors/advisers. At the time, I was trying to move all the lengthy posts, discussion between editors who were not my mentors/advisers off the monitoring page so that I and my mentors/advisers could reasonably work on a complaint format free from attacks and the disruptive free-for-all that was occurring on the monitoring page. I felt the monitoring page had become useless. However, apparently I went about this the wrong way. So, I am looking for input on how to handle this. Meanwhile, at least the arbitration clarification request is siphoning  off all the comments that would have gone on that page, so that is a blessing, and discussion is progressing as to a complaint form.  What do you think I should do?  Regard, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271029 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271026 +++$+++ 271028 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.255654680E09 +++$+++ You should immediately stop claiming that you are the one who is being attacked, when in reality it is ''you'' who persist in impugning the motives of others. You just did it again above. -- +++$+++ :::You should immediately stop claiming that you are the one who is being attacked, when in reality it is ''you'' who persist in impugning the motives of others. You just did it again above. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 17:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271030 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271026 +++$+++ 271028 +++$+++ 2009-10-16 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.255719240E09 +++$+++ I think you should pause activity on any of the subpages until the result of the ArbCom clarification is known. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :::I think you should pause activity on any of the subpages until the result of the ArbCom clarification is known. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 11:54, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
271031 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271026 +++$+++ 271030 +++$+++ 2009-10-16 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.255719660E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I have. Thanks!  \u2014 +++$+++ ::::Yeah, I have. Thanks!  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

8883 +++$+++ Conscious +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.168841760E09 +++$+++ Hello, you should probably visit Commons and put licensing tags to your images, they're in danger of deletion.  +++$+++ Hello, you should probably visit Commons and put licensing tags to your images, they're in danger of deletion. [[User:Conscious|Conscious]] 22:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
8884 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8883 +++$+++ 8883 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.168842000E09 +++$+++ Argh!! I thought I did! -- +++$+++ : Argh!! I thought I did! --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 22:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

8885 +++$+++ BanyanTree +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.168924200E09 +++$+++ Hi Peter, I created [[:commons:Category:Somali Civil War maps]] and placed your maps, as well as those created by others, there.  I noticed that in one case you had noted on a talk that an image had been superceded by an updated upload.  When you have the time, it would be helpful of using the \"other versions\" field to clarify both the \"previous\" and \"succeeding\" maps for the images, so users can step through the maps without searching the entire category. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Peter, I created [[:commons:Category:Somali Civil War maps]] and placed your maps, as well as those created by others, there.  I noticed that in one case you had noted on a talk that an image had been superceded by an updated upload.  When you have the time, it would be helpful of using the "other versions" field to clarify both the "previous" and "succeeding" maps for the images, so users can step through the maps without searching the entire category. Cheers, [[User:BanyanTree|Banyan]][[User talk:BanyanTree|Tree]] 21:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
8886 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8885 +++$+++ 8885 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.168933920E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I was thinking of doing that just the other day but got sleepy! I took the old images and marked them with \"badname\" and also filled out the succeeding maps field. I also took out the Somali Civil War category field so that they would not clutter up the gallery. Yes, it would be confusing to someone to see the others, which I consider \"deprecated\" like old versions of software. -- +++$+++ :Thanks! I was thinking of doing that just the other day but got sleepy! I took the old images and marked them with "badname" and also filled out the succeeding maps field. I also took out the Somali Civil War category field so that they would not clutter up the gallery. Yes, it would be confusing to someone to see the others, which I consider "deprecated" like old versions of software. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 23:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

532527 +++$+++ Rama's Arrow +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-14 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.147661640E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone - I'm very sorry to have disappointed your expectation in me, but it had become impossible for me to compromise my principles. I don't covet adminship at all, so it wasn't a difficult decision - I simply cannot accept misrepresentation and nonsense. However, I cannot tell you how greatly joyous I feel at the enthusiastic, wonderful support you expressed for me. I don't know how hard it will be to understand that your supports means extremely a lot to me. I thank you from my heart, and please let me know if I can ever be assistance or help in anything.  +++$+++ Hi Tone - I'm very sorry to have disappointed your expectation in me, but it had become impossible for me to compromise my principles. I don't covet adminship at all, so it wasn't a difficult decision - I simply cannot accept misrepresentation and nonsense. However, I cannot tell you how greatly joyous I feel at the enthusiastic, wonderful support you expressed for me. I don't know how hard it will be to understand that your supports means extremely a lot to me. I thank you from my heart, and please let me know if I can ever be assistance or help in anything. [[User:Rama's Arrow|Rama&#39;s Arrow]] 19:54, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
532528 +++$+++ Rama's Arrow +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532527 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.147665540E09 +++$+++ I sincerely regret the cut\/paste mistake. Make no mistake - I am greatly thankful to you.  +++$+++ ::I sincerely regret the cut/paste mistake. Make no mistake - I am greatly thankful to you. [[User:Rama's Arrow|Rama&#39;s Arrow]] 20:59, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
532529 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532527 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.147665600E09 +++$+++ It's fine. I know what you ment. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ ::: It's fine. I know what you ment. --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 21:00, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
532530 +++$+++ Rama's Arrow +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532527 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.147665840E09 +++$+++ No in fact I'm feeling high - it was a torture to allow people to think I would put up with that nonsense just for adminship.  +++$+++ ::No in fact I'm feeling high - it was a torture to allow people to think I would put up with that nonsense just for adminship. [[User:Rama's Arrow|Rama&#39;s Arrow]] 21:04, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

8887 +++$+++ JuJube +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-16 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.168973220E09 +++$+++ Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. <!-- Template:Drmspeedy -->   +++$+++ Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. <!-- Template:Drmspeedy -->  [[User:JuJube|JuJube]] 10:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
8888 +++$+++ JuJube +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8887 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.168977300E09 +++$+++ You have recently re-created the article [[:Castle Marrach]], which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's [[WP:DP|deletion policies]]. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a [[WP:DRV|deletion review]]. <!-- Template:Recreated -->  +++$+++ **You have recently re-created the article [[:Castle Marrach]], which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's [[WP:DP|deletion policies]]. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a [[WP:DRV|deletion review]]. <!-- Template:Recreated --> [[User:JuJube|JuJube]] 11:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

8889 +++$+++ Janarius +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-16 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.168989240E09 +++$+++ Hello, can you move your current article to Bruce Williams (Royal Navy). It is to follow the policy on [[wikipedia:disambiguation|disambiguation]]. Thank you, -- +++$+++ Hello, can you move your current article to Bruce Williams (Royal Navy). It is to follow the policy on [[wikipedia:disambiguation|disambiguation]]. Thank you, --[[User:Janarius|Janarius]] 15:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
8890 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8889 +++$+++ 8889 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.168989300E09 +++$+++ Willdo. I had already created the redirect under that. I'll flip-flop it. -- +++$+++ :Willdo. I had already created the redirect under that. I'll flip-flop it. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 15:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
8891 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8889 +++$+++ 8890 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.168989420E09 +++$+++ Done. -- +++$+++ ::Done. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 15:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

533178 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533178 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-30 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.206927720E09 +++$+++ Well it really is good to see that several editors such as yourself and the others are on the ball, and are also capable individuals who are able to root out the articles which aren't notable. Lets hope coverage and quality can increase in due course. Regards  +++$+++ Well it really is good to see that several editors such as yourself and the others are on the ball, and are also capable individuals who are able to root out the articles which aren't notable. Lets hope coverage and quality can increase in due course. Regards [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">'''$1,000,000?'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 18:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
533179 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533178 +++$+++ 533178 +++$+++ 2008-03-30 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.206927960E09 +++$+++ :-) As you have noticed, we are having a discussion on three talkpages (we two and Viator). Maybe we should discuss issues, that are relevant to the project on the taskforce talkpage... I'll add that thing about wuality rating to the page as well. --''' +++$+++ : :-) As you have noticed, we are having a discussion on three talkpages (we two and Viator). Maybe we should discuss issues, that are relevant to the project on the taskforce talkpage... I'll add that thing about wuality rating to the page as well. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

271035 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-11 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.255292340E09 +++$+++ Mattisse I have an [[The Disasters of War| FAC]] I would very much like you to look at. A careful, detailed review from you would be appreciated. I would relish the challenge of going up against your scalpels, I think it would lead to a much improved artice.  +++$+++ Mattisse I have an [[The Disasters of War| FAC]] I would very much like you to look at. A careful, detailed review from you would be appreciated. I would relish the challenge of going up against your scalpels, I think it would lead to a much improved artice. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 13:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
271036 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271035 +++$+++ 271035 +++$+++ 2009-10-11 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.255298100E09 +++$+++ I would be happy to go through it, though having no expert knowledge on Goya. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :I would be happy to go through it, though having no expert knowledge on Goya. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:55, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
271037 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271035 +++$+++ 271036 +++$+++ 2009-10-17 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.255830420E09 +++$+++ More please.  +++$+++ ::More please. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 18:47, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
271038 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271035 +++$+++ 271037 +++$+++ 2009-10-19 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.255999560E09 +++$+++ I think it is best if I do no more. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::I think it is best if I do no more. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:46, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

8892 +++$+++ Ingoman +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.169111040E09 +++$+++ Galmudug's ambition, for instance, isn't to overthrow an authority or independence, but rather a regional administration.-- +++$+++ Galmudug's ambition, for instance, isn't to overthrow an authority or independence, but rather a regional administration.--[[User:Ingoman|Ingoman]] 01:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
8893 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8892 +++$+++ 8892 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.169111580E09 +++$+++ I know it is a \"state\" but it's not a country with its own currency, etc. I gave it the same sort of Infobox we're using for the ICU and other Somali Civil War factions. It is certainly not as well-organized as Puntland or Somaliland, and in fact, we've heard no news of it since the December battles. It is far more like a faction which declared itself like a state, such as Southwestern Somalia or the [[Juba Valley Alliance]]. -- +++$+++ : I know it is a "state" but it's not a country with its own currency, etc. I gave it the same sort of Infobox we're using for the ICU and other Somali Civil War factions. It is certainly not as well-organized as Puntland or Somaliland, and in fact, we've heard no news of it since the December battles. It is far more like a faction which declared itself like a state, such as Southwestern Somalia or the [[Juba Valley Alliance]]. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 01:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

8894 +++$+++ WilsonjrWikipedia +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-22 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.169458140E09 +++$+++ Peter, great work on the Somali articles! How do you know so much about Somalia (I ask b\/c aren't you an author on role playing games)? Anyways, keep up the good work!!! Cheers - [[Image:Face-grin.svg|20px]] -  +++$+++ Peter, great work on the Somali articles! How do you know so much about Somalia (I ask b/c aren't you an author on role playing games)? Anyways, keep up the good work!!! Cheers - [[Image:Face-grin.svg|20px]] - [[User:WilsonjrWikipedia|WilsonjrWikipedia]] ([[User talk:WilsonjrWikipedia|talk]]) 01:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
8895 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8894 +++$+++ 8894 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.170111120E09 +++$+++ Thanks greatly! Besides the roleplaying games I have worked on, I work on a number of other games which are more historical, political and military. I came in \"sideways\" to the Somalia project. My other focus has been on the west Balkans (former Yugoslavia). -- +++$+++ :Thanks greatly! Besides the roleplaying games I have worked on, I work on a number of other games which are more historical, political and military. I came in "sideways" to the Somalia project. My other focus has been on the west Balkans (former Yugoslavia). --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 14:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

271039 +++$+++ Edge3 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271039 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-18 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.255929480E09 +++$+++ Hello, Mattisse. I'm reminding you that you still have a GA review in progress at [[Talk:Choor Singh\/GA1]]. [[User:Jacklee|Jacklee]] has been reminded of this fact as well.-- +++$+++ Hello, Mattisse. I'm reminding you that you still have a GA review in progress at [[Talk:Choor Singh/GA1]]. [[User:Jacklee|Jacklee]] has been reminded of this fact as well.--[[User:Edge3|Edge3]] ([[User talk:Edge3|talk]]) 22:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
271040 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271039 +++$+++ 271039 +++$+++ 2009-10-18 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.255933020E09 +++$+++ I have reminded him again on his user page. If only he would address the [[Talk:Choor Singh\/GA1]].  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :I have reminded him again on his user page. If only he would address the [[Talk:Choor Singh/GA1]].  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
271041 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271039 +++$+++ 271040 +++$+++ 2009-10-19 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.255986720E09 +++$+++ Thanks. This has been completed. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::Thanks. This has been completed. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:12, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

8896 +++$+++ RoboRanks +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8896 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-29 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.170116760E09 +++$+++ i agree your a good contributor please continue the fine work!   +++$+++ i agree your a good contributor please continue the fine work!  [[User:RoboRanks|RoboRanks]] 16:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
8897 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8896 +++$+++ 8896 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.170117000E09 +++$+++ Danke! I'm back after I took a week off after a lot of intense wikifying. -- +++$+++ :Danke! I'm back after I took a week off after a lot of intense wikifying. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 16:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

88864 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88864 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-31 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.162363560E09 +++$+++ P. S. Why is your activity dropping rapidly? -- +++$+++ P. S. Why is your activity dropping rapidly? --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 22:46, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
88865 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88864 +++$+++ 88864 +++$+++ 2006-10-31 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.162364220E09 +++$+++ You (Joy) might want to put a notice on top of your talk page saying \"I will not archive my talk page, if you want to know why, read it\" or something :-) -- +++$+++ : You (Joy) might want to put a notice on top of your talk page saying "I will not archive my talk page, if you want to know why, read it" or something :-) --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 22:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

8898 +++$+++ Rangeley +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-26 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.169875680E09 +++$+++ As someone who has shown themselves to be objective in [[War in Somalia (2006\u2013present)|articles on war]], I invite you to participate in discussion on the topic of the relationship between the [[Iraq War]] and the US-led [[War on Terrorism]] campaign at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Iraq_War#War_on_Terrorism this location]. ~''' +++$+++ As someone who has shown themselves to be objective in [[War in Somalia (2006–present)|articles on war]], I invite you to participate in discussion on the topic of the relationship between the [[Iraq War]] and the US-led [[War on Terrorism]] campaign at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Iraq_War#War_on_Terrorism this location]. ~'''[[User:Rangeley|<span style="color:#0055aa;text-decoration:underline;">Rangeley</span>]] ([[User_talk:Rangeley|<span style="color:#0055aa;text-decoration:underline;">talk</span>]])''' 21:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
8899 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8898 +++$+++ 8898 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.170111180E09 +++$+++ Yeesh. What an edit war! -- +++$+++ :Yeesh. What an edit war! --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 14:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

8900 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8900 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-03 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.170516840E09 +++$+++ Peter, you seem to have some interest\/expertise in [[Somalia]], which I lack.  Can you take a look at [[Special:Contributions\/Finfinne|these]] edits?  I reviewed the changes, and as far as I can tell, all of this person's edits either introduced errors into cited figures, or removed citations entirely; I've reverted all of his recent edits.  I have no idea what he's trying to accomplish, but this seems to be an ongoing pattern. --  +++$+++ Peter, you seem to have some interest/expertise in [[Somalia]], which I lack.  Can you take a look at [[Special:Contributions/Finfinne|these]] edits?  I reviewed the changes, and as far as I can tell, all of this person's edits either introduced errors into cited figures, or removed citations entirely; I've reverted all of his recent edits.  I have no idea what he's trying to accomplish, but this seems to be an ongoing pattern. -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 07:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
8901 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8900 +++$+++ 8900 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 07:37:00 +++$+++ 1.170517020E09 +++$+++ Thanks greatly. Yes, he seems to be simply screwing with numbers, as many people have done with many articles. It's annoying, but you are to be commended for keeping sanity. -- +++$+++ :Thanks greatly. Yes, he seems to be simply screwing with numbers, as many people have done with many articles. It's annoying, but you are to be commended for keeping sanity. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 07:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
8902 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8900 +++$+++ 8901 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.170517140E09 +++$+++ By the way, just noticed he was blocked. It's a shame when people try to be obtuse. -- +++$+++ ::By the way, just noticed he was blocked. It's a shame when people try to be obtuse. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 07:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
8903 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8900 +++$+++ 8902 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.170517560E09 +++$+++ Yes, when I reverted the first batch of changes, I noticed that his talk page was already cluttered with similar warnings, so I sent him a final warning, with a links to prove to him that he had vandalized cited figures.  He continued making the same sort of edits, so I reported him to [[WP:AIV]].  Unfortunately, I know nothing about the subject, so I have no way to tell if he's ever made any legitimate edits, so I only reported him for vandalism (i.e. temporary block) as opposed to a vandalism-only account (permanent block). --  +++$+++ :::Yes, when I reverted the first batch of changes, I noticed that his talk page was already cluttered with similar warnings, so I sent him a final warning, with a links to prove to him that he had vandalized cited figures.  He continued making the same sort of edits, so I reported him to [[WP:AIV]].  Unfortunately, I know nothing about the subject, so I have no way to tell if he's ever made any legitimate edits, so I only reported him for vandalism (i.e. temporary block) as opposed to a vandalism-only account (permanent block). -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 07:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

438390 +++$+++ Invertzoo +++$+++ JoJan +++$+++ 438390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-01 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.306982340E09 +++$+++ Hi JoJan, This disambiguation page was recently created a few days ago. I explained the reasons against doing this kind of thing and the editor has agreed to have it deleted. The discussion is partly on the article talk page and partly on the user's talk page. Do you agree that it is not a useful DAP? Should it be listed for deletion? Is that how this is done?  +++$+++ Hi JoJan, This disambiguation page was recently created a few days ago. I explained the reasons against doing this kind of thing and the editor has agreed to have it deleted. The discussion is partly on the article talk page and partly on the user's talk page. Do you agree that it is not a useful DAP? Should it be listed for deletion? Is that how this is done? [[User:Invertzoo|Invertzoo]] ([[User talk:Invertzoo|talk]]) 19:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
438391 +++$+++ JoJan +++$+++ JoJan +++$+++ 438390 +++$+++ 438390 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.307056020E09 +++$+++ The disambiguation page has been deleted under \"G7. Author requests deletion\".  +++$+++ : The disambiguation page has been deleted under "G7. Author requests deletion". [[User:JoJan|JoJan]] ([[User talk:JoJan#top|talk]]) 16:07, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

271047 +++$+++ the_ed17 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271047 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-07 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.254950700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the copyediting, Matisse; it's much appreciated. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=North_Carolina_class_battleship&curid=483130&diff=318457185&oldid=318456703 Here] I was trying to say \"eight or nine\" with a dash because I had another \"or\" later in the sentence. Have any ideas on how to make it work? :-) \u2014<font face=\"Baskerville Old Face\"> +++$+++ Thanks for the copyediting, Matisse; it's much appreciated. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_Carolina_class_battleship&curid=483130&diff=318457185&oldid=318456703 Here] I was trying to say "eight or nine" with a dash because I had another "or" later in the sentence. Have any ideas on how to make it work? :-) —<font face="Baskerville Old Face">[[User:the_ed17|<font color="800000">Ed]]&nbsp;[[User talk:the_ed17|<font color="800000">(talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/the_ed17|<font color="800000">contribs)]]</font> 14:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
271048 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271047 +++$+++ 271047 +++$+++ 2009-10-07 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.254951120E09 +++$+++ I am not very confident copy editing the article, not being familiar with the subject matter at all. MoS has strict rules regarding hyphens, dashes etc., but if I think about them too much I get mixed up. You should format it however you prefer over any changes I make.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :I am not very confident copy editing the article, not being familiar with the subject matter at all. MoS has strict rules regarding hyphens, dashes etc., but if I think about them too much I get mixed up. You should format it however you prefer over any changes I make.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
271049 +++$+++ the_ed17 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271047 +++$+++ 271048 +++$+++ 2009-10-07 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.254952740E09 +++$+++ Be confident; I'm looking over the copyedits anyway to be sure. ;-) In that, it now says \"[...] ship with an eight-nine, 16-inch main battery, or rather one akin to \"A\", \"B\" or \"C\"\" when we need it to say \"[...] ship with an eight or nine, 16-inch main battery, or rather one akin to \"A\", \"B\" or \"C\". The problem is that there are two \"or\"s, and I can't come up with a way to phrase it... \u2014<font face=\"Baskerville Old Face\"> +++$+++ ::Be confident; I'm looking over the copyedits anyway to be sure. ;-) In that, it now says "[...] ship with an eight-nine, 16-inch main battery, or rather one akin to "A", "B" or "C"" when we need it to say "[...] ship with an eight or nine, 16-inch main battery, or rather one akin to "A", "B" or "C". The problem is that there are two "or"s, and I can't come up with a way to phrase it... —<font face="Baskerville Old Face">[[User:the_ed17|<font color="800000">Ed]]&nbsp;[[User talk:the_ed17|<font color="800000">(talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/the_ed17|<font color="800000">contribs)]]</font> 14:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
271050 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271047 +++$+++ 271049 +++$+++ 2009-10-08 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.255048740E09 +++$+++ I did what I could but the article is over my head. I no longer copy edit articles, so I have forgotten many of the rules. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::I did what I could but the article is over my head. I no longer copy edit articles, so I have forgotten many of the rules. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
271051 +++$+++ the_ed17 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271047 +++$+++ 271050 +++$+++ 2009-10-08 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.255068240E09 +++$+++ It's alright; your copyedits were greatly appreciated, regardless of how little you remember. :-) Besides, I'm sure that if you missed anything the FAC people will catch it. ;-) Thanks again and cheers, \u2014<font face=\"Baskerville Old Face\"> +++$+++ ::::It's alright; your copyedits were greatly appreciated, regardless of how little you remember. :-) Besides, I'm sure that if you missed anything the FAC people will catch it. ;-) Thanks again and cheers, —<font face="Baskerville Old Face">[[User:the_ed17|<font color="800000">Ed]]&nbsp;[[User talk:the_ed17|<font color="800000">(talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/the_ed17|<font color="800000">contribs)]]</font> 23:04, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
271052 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271047 +++$+++ 271051 +++$+++ 2009-10-08 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.255068720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments. The article is very well written and I was impressed.  I am unsure about the hyphen\/endash situation, as I said. Good luck! Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::Thanks for your comments. The article is very well written and I was impressed.  I am unsure about the hyphen/endash situation, as I said. Good luck! Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
271053 +++$+++ the_ed17 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271047 +++$+++ 271052 +++$+++ 2009-10-08 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.255068960E09 +++$+++ No, thanks for ''your'' comments and edits to the article! I'll figure out the endash\/hyphen crap when I go to FAC...so confusing. :-) \u2014<font face=\"Baskerville Old Face\"> +++$+++ ::::::No, thanks for ''your'' comments and edits to the article! I'll figure out the endash/hyphen crap when I go to FAC...so confusing. :-) —<font face="Baskerville Old Face">[[User:the_ed17|<font color="800000">Ed]]&nbsp;[[User talk:the_ed17|<font color="800000">(talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/the_ed17|<font color="800000">contribs)]]</font> 23:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

8904 +++$+++ Whiskey Pete +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Good [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Abdullahi_Yusuf_Ahmed&curid=1056813&diff=105341251&oldid=105340864 catch], man. -- +++$+++ Good [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abdullahi_Yusuf_Ahmed&curid=1056813&diff=105341251&oldid=105340864 catch], man. --[[User:Whiskey Pete|Whiskey Pete]], 00:43 5 February 2007 (UTC)
8905 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8904 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.170679500E09 +++$+++ Danke! The thing is that in relative terms of Somali politics, it ''is'' somewhat powerful. Also, thank you for the catches you have been making in many of the related articles. -- +++$+++ :: Danke! The thing is that in relative terms of Somali politics, it ''is'' somewhat powerful. Also, thank you for the catches you have been making in many of the related articles. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 04:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

8906 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-05 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.170689580E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that was a pleasant surprise!  I have to say, though, I'm baffled as to what that person ([[User talk:Finfinne]], [[User talk:Eastafrica institute]]) is up to.  I hesitate to call it simple vandalism...there seems to be a method to his madness; I just can't figure it out.  I've wondered if possibly his English is so limited that he's not able to communicate well on talk pages, but if that's the case, he really shouldn't be editing articles on the English Wikipedia in the first place. --  +++$+++ Thanks, that was a pleasant surprise!  I have to say, though, I'm baffled as to what that person ([[User talk:Finfinne]], [[User talk:Eastafrica institute]]) is up to.  I hesitate to call it simple vandalism...there seems to be a method to his madness; I just can't figure it out.  I've wondered if possibly his English is so limited that he's not able to communicate well on talk pages, but if that's the case, he really shouldn't be editing articles on the English Wikipedia in the first place. -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 07:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
8907 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8906 +++$+++ 8906 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.170690000E09 +++$+++ Most welcome! Yes. There often seems to be a method to many folk's insertions. I also try to give folks a chance to explain their actions, and invite discussion on the Talk pages. However, I have seen the Somali pages get very contentious regarding tribal ethnicity and I watch quite a bit of hijacking of the articles because of deep-seated ethnic and political agendas. Claims of condemnation of other factional leaders as \"war criminals\" or the apologetic whitewashing of similar pasts. When I saw these maps and entire clans were removed, I had an immediate concern there was some revisionism going on. -- +++$+++ :Most welcome! Yes. There often seems to be a method to many folk's insertions. I also try to give folks a chance to explain their actions, and invite discussion on the Talk pages. However, I have seen the Somali pages get very contentious regarding tribal ethnicity and I watch quite a bit of hijacking of the articles because of deep-seated ethnic and political agendas. Claims of condemnation of other factional leaders as "war criminals" or the apologetic whitewashing of similar pasts. When I saw these maps and entire clans were removed, I had an immediate concern there was some revisionism going on. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 07:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
8908 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8906 +++$+++ 8907 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.170690240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the barnstar, at this point I feel little of my sanity is left. I deleted the images from [[User:Eastafrica institute]] and [[User:Sanaagian]], who I also blocked. I need to go back to Sanaagian and see if he is a sockpuppet and if so of who.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the barnstar, at this point I feel little of my sanity is left. I deleted the images from [[User:Eastafrica institute]] and [[User:Sanaagian]], who I also blocked. I need to go back to Sanaagian and see if he is a sockpuppet and if so of who. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 07:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
8909 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8906 +++$+++ 8907 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.170690660E09 +++$+++ I was actually relieved to find straightforward POV edits like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Gurage&diff=prev&oldid=105571783 this one]; at least that's vandalism that I understand!  But that business of repeatedly deleting the citations from the opening paragraph while leaving the text more or less intact just confuses me.  And edits that just involve the addition, deletion, or changes to huge lists of mostly redlinked names leaves me at a complete loss.  Without any context to go by, I have to let it go and hope for the best. I'm just glad you're keeping an eye on those articles to sanity-check the bizarre edits. --  +++$+++ ::I was actually relieved to find straightforward POV edits like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gurage&diff=prev&oldid=105571783 this one]; at least that's vandalism that I understand!  But that business of repeatedly deleting the citations from the opening paragraph while leaving the text more or less intact just confuses me.  And edits that just involve the addition, deletion, or changes to huge lists of mostly redlinked names leaves me at a complete loss.  Without any context to go by, I have to let it go and hope for the best. I'm just glad you're keeping an eye on those articles to sanity-check the bizarre edits. -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 07:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
8910 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8906 +++$+++ 8909 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.170690840E09 +++$+++ Yes, I am also concerned when there are long lists of undocumented additions. Some of them are based on other article sources on Wikipedia, but some, such as a recent addition of a General of the 1st Division of the new TFG army made me scratch my head. The only reference to that name I could find on Google that was similar is a 1997 track star from Somalia. Could it be the same person? A different person with the same name? I have no context. However, when I see \"Tony Blair\" listed as a Somali member of the ICU, even I smile at the baldfaced attempts of vandals. Nice try, but... Revert! -- +++$+++ :::Yes, I am also concerned when there are long lists of undocumented additions. Some of them are based on other article sources on Wikipedia, but some, such as a recent addition of a General of the 1st Division of the new TFG army made me scratch my head. The only reference to that name I could find on Google that was similar is a 1997 track star from Somalia. Could it be the same person? A different person with the same name? I have no context. However, when I see "Tony Blair" listed as a Somali member of the ICU, even I smile at the baldfaced attempts of vandals. Nice try, but... Revert! --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 07:54, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

271054 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-22 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.256268060E09 +++$+++ Do you think you could do some work on Khrushchev?  Tony left a very productive note on the Military review page, pointing out some specific problems (I'll do them today or tomorrow, I'm trying to get some work done on Chamberlain) and seems to think it could use a ce.  No huge hurry.  Thanks.-- +++$+++ Do you think you could do some work on Khrushchev?  Tony left a very productive note on the Military review page, pointing out some specific problems (I'll do them today or tomorrow, I'm trying to get some work done on Chamberlain) and seems to think it could use a ce.  No huge hurry.  Thanks.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 20:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271055 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271054 +++$+++ 271054 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.256360100E09 +++$+++ No, sorry,  as I am not doing copy editing for FAC or potential FAC articles any more. Gets me into too much trouble. I'm sticking to more serene areas of Wikipedia for now.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :No, sorry,  as I am not doing copy editing for FAC or potential FAC articles any more. Gets me into too much trouble. I'm sticking to more serene areas of Wikipedia for now.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

8911 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8911 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 07:38:00 +++$+++ 1.170949080E09 +++$+++ Can you look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Darod&diff=prev&oldid=106479876 this] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Darod&diff=next&oldid=106479876 this], plus the newly created [[Sheikh Abdirahmaan bin Ismaaciil Jabarti]]. I can't seem to find any solid references to him under that name and even looking for the older version from the Darod article isn't that great either. Thanks.  +++$+++ Can you look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Darod&diff=prev&oldid=106479876 this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Darod&diff=next&oldid=106479876 this], plus the newly created [[Sheikh Abdirahmaan bin Ismaaciil Jabarti]]. I can't seem to find any solid references to him under that name and even looking for the older version from the Darod article isn't that great either. Thanks. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 07:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
8912 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8911 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.170950580E09 +++$+++ Urgh. Yes, it is problematic. I just left comments on [[Talk:Abdirahman Is'mail Al Jaberti]]. -- +++$+++ ::Urgh. Yes, it is problematic. I just left comments on [[Talk:Abdirahman Is'mail Al Jaberti]]. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 08:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
8913 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8911 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.170951000E09 +++$+++ Also, just moved it to [[Abdirahman Is'mail Al Jaberti]] -- +++$+++ :::Also, just moved it to [[Abdirahman Is'mail Al Jaberti]] --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 08:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

271056 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-13 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.255500840E09 +++$+++ Just thought you might like to know. There are about 14000 works with at least the word \"encyclopedia\" prominently included in the public domain available at Google scholar [http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar?hl=en&as_yhi=1922&q=encyclopedia here].  +++$+++ Just thought you might like to know. There are about 14000 works with at least the word "encyclopedia" prominently included in the public domain available at Google scholar [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_yhi=1922&q=encyclopedia here]. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 23:14, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
271057 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.255501680E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I am a little at a loss how to turn an encyclopedia into a dyk. Any hints as to how to do it?  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks! I am a little at a loss how to turn an encyclopedia into a dyk. Any hints as to how to do it?  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:28, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
271058 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271057 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.255502640E09 +++$+++ Well, obviously, you can't. But each of those sources is at this point public domain. Which means, in the worst case scenario, you could take the content word for word from any one of the and add it to our article on the subject, if we have one. Like I've said elsewhere, we are missing a lot of articles, particularly about the non-English speaking world. And a lot of others are in fairly poor shape, Stubs and the like. With this, you could probably turn at least half of the articles which are basically \"historic\" in nature into real articles, by just adding the material from these sources. I was looking at one of the public domain books on the papacy, actually. About half of the articles we have on individual popes are right now stubs. With what in the public domain, considering history doesn't change that much over time, I think we could probably turn almost all of them into at least good C class articles. That's just one area I was noticing today, but there would be any number of others as well. Any state or country, I think I saw an encyclopedia of Virginia in there?, would welcome content regarding its historical political and cultural leaders, and improvement to the articles on its localities. Basically, find any subject that isn't too current that you find an interest in, use those sources and some other, more current ones, which you could probably get off the net, and I think you could probably turn virtually anything you wanted to into at least a good DYK, if you used multiple sources from there probably even at least a C class. And we've only got about 1 or 2 million stubs as we speak right now, so I think if you wanted to there would be more than enough to keep one occupied and keeping the DYK secton full for at least a few weeks, maybe even a few months. I guess it depends on how fast you can type. :)  +++$+++ ::Well, obviously, you can't. But each of those sources is at this point public domain. Which means, in the worst case scenario, you could take the content word for word from any one of the and add it to our article on the subject, if we have one. Like I've said elsewhere, we are missing a lot of articles, particularly about the non-English speaking world. And a lot of others are in fairly poor shape, Stubs and the like. With this, you could probably turn at least half of the articles which are basically "historic" in nature into real articles, by just adding the material from these sources. I was looking at one of the public domain books on the papacy, actually. About half of the articles we have on individual popes are right now stubs. With what in the public domain, considering history doesn't change that much over time, I think we could probably turn almost all of them into at least good C class articles. That's just one area I was noticing today, but there would be any number of others as well. Any state or country, I think I saw an encyclopedia of Virginia in there?, would welcome content regarding its historical political and cultural leaders, and improvement to the articles on its localities. Basically, find any subject that isn't too current that you find an interest in, use those sources and some other, more current ones, which you could probably get off the net, and I think you could probably turn virtually anything you wanted to into at least a good DYK, if you used multiple sources from there probably even at least a C class. And we've only got about 1 or 2 million stubs as we speak right now, so I think if you wanted to there would be more than enough to keep one occupied and keeping the DYK secton full for at least a few weeks, maybe even a few months. I guess it depends on how fast you can type. :) [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 23:44, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
271059 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271058 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.255503960E09 +++$+++ Even if material is in the public domain, it must either be quoted or rewritten in one's own words. Therefore, I only write articles on subjects that I know enough about, or can figure out, to write from scratch. I am not interested in doing an article otherwise. If you look at my dyk's or my article creations, you will see that they cover a wide range of topics, many weighted toward third world topics. But with each, I started with an interest in the topic. I have created hundreds of articles, almost all still basically in their original state, although some have undergone name changes. I no longer believe in the concept of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, which basically means I can only write articles on subjects that I am driven to learn about. My ability to copy edit has diminished also. I used to be able to copy edit any article on any topic for the joy of copy editing. Now I have to be motivated by a genuine interest in the topic, and cannot do it as \"for Wiki hire\" so to speak. Meaning, I am not willing to copy edit upon demand like I used to do. There was one editor who regularly copy\/pasted my edits from his user space into his own article in the main space. After a while, I refused to copy edit his FACs any more, which caused a brouhaha. I think I was being regarded as a copy edit work horse. I'm no longer willing to do that. However, I appreciate your suggestions, as I would love to feel about Wikipedia as I did in the olden days when I really cared and believed in it.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::Even if material is in the public domain, it must either be quoted or rewritten in one's own words. Therefore, I only write articles on subjects that I know enough about, or can figure out, to write from scratch. I am not interested in doing an article otherwise. If you look at my dyk's or my article creations, you will see that they cover a wide range of topics, many weighted toward third world topics. But with each, I started with an interest in the topic. I have created hundreds of articles, almost all still basically in their original state, although some have undergone name changes. I no longer believe in the concept of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, which basically means I can only write articles on subjects that I am driven to learn about. My ability to copy edit has diminished also. I used to be able to copy edit any article on any topic for the joy of copy editing. Now I have to be motivated by a genuine interest in the topic, and cannot do it as "for Wiki hire" so to speak. Meaning, I am not willing to copy edit upon demand like I used to do. There was one editor who regularly copy/pasted my edits from his user space into his own article in the main space. After a while, I refused to copy edit his FACs any more, which caused a brouhaha. I think I was being regarded as a copy edit work horse. I'm no longer willing to do that. However, I appreciate your suggestions, as I would love to feel about Wikipedia as I did in the olden days when I really cared and believed in it.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:06, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
271060 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271059 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.255505100E09 +++$+++ I don't doubt you. That's why I said find a subject that interests you up front. But there are so many subjects out there. For all I know, as a slight opera fan, I could probably put together about 30 to 40 articles on the more notable performers of Wotan in Wagner's Ring cycle on the basis of the material there. And I think most people would consider that a fairly minor topic. If nothing else, you might consider just paging through [[JSTOR]], Google books or Google scholar and see if there are any subjects that aren't covered very well that you find interesting. We could use all of it, believe me. Anyway, if there are any subjects in there that do interest you, I think everyone would be more than happy to see you add whatever you wanted to from them. [[User:Himalayan Explorer]], like I've said before, is one of our leaders in developing content from less-well-covered areas, and I'm sure if you wanted to help develop some content regarding such areas, I think he would have even more sources which could be used.  +++$+++ ::::I don't doubt you. That's why I said find a subject that interests you up front. But there are so many subjects out there. For all I know, as a slight opera fan, I could probably put together about 30 to 40 articles on the more notable performers of Wotan in Wagner's Ring cycle on the basis of the material there. And I think most people would consider that a fairly minor topic. If nothing else, you might consider just paging through [[JSTOR]], Google books or Google scholar and see if there are any subjects that aren't covered very well that you find interesting. We could use all of it, believe me. Anyway, if there are any subjects in there that do interest you, I think everyone would be more than happy to see you add whatever you wanted to from them. [[User:Himalayan Explorer]], like I've said before, is one of our leaders in developing content from less-well-covered areas, and I'm sure if you wanted to help develop some content regarding such areas, I think he would have even more sources which could be used. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 00:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
271061 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271059 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.255525500E09 +++$+++ I agree with [[User:John Carter|John Carter]]. In fact I'd go further - find a topic you really, irrespective of whether it's covered already; there are always gaps to be filled. It's struck me a few times that much of your work at WP has been helping others - it's time to do something just for your own satisfaction.  -- +++$+++ ::::I agree with [[User:John Carter|John Carter]]. In fact I'd go further - find a topic you really, irrespective of whether it's covered already; there are always gaps to be filled. It's struck me a few times that much of your work at WP has been helping others - it's time to do something just for your own satisfaction.  --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 06:05, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
271062 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271061 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.255546620E09 +++$+++ That is what I have been doing lately with the dyk's. I have no desire to put substantial work into anything for Wikipedia again at this point. It is easier to do dyk's than to copy edit someone else's article. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::: That is what I have been doing lately with the dyk's. I have no desire to put substantial work into anything for Wikipedia again at this point. It is easier to do dyk's than to copy edit someone else's article. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 11:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
271063 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271062 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.255597320E09 +++$+++ Anyway, shutting up now.  +++$+++ ::::::Anyway, shutting up now. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 02:02, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271064 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271063 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.255598400E09 +++$+++ Well, I used to enjoy reviewing and copy editing FACs untill driven away from there by accusations about my comments about a couple of articles from a very few editors. I used to enjoy reviewing GAN, until driven away by accusations aout my comments about a couple of articles by a very few editors. I used to enjoy evaluating dyk hooks, but now I am under attack about that, an attack I don't at this point understand. So I will desist from reviewing hooks for now. The point is that just a couple of insistent  editors is enough to drive a productive editor from Wikipedia chores.  Is this in the best interest of Wikipedia? Regads, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::::: Well, I used to enjoy reviewing and copy editing FACs untill driven away from there by accusations about my comments about a couple of articles from a very few editors. I used to enjoy reviewing GAN, until driven away by accusations aout my comments about a couple of articles by a very few editors. I used to enjoy evaluating dyk hooks, but now I am under attack about that, an attack I don't at this point understand. So I will desist from reviewing hooks for now. The point is that just a couple of insistent  editors is enough to drive a productive editor from Wikipedia chores.  Is this in the best interest of Wikipedia? Regads, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:20, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271065 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271064 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.255601100E09 +++$+++ If there were any topics you did find interesting that weren't well developed, if you provided a bit of a focus for others to collect around, you might well be able to actually make the content on those topics something we could all be proud of. And I mean the entire content, not just those articles that are close to DYK, GA, or FA. That is, of course, if you found any subjects that really interest you. All I'm really asking is that you, basically, keep your eyes open. If there is one editor around here who basically knows the extant WikiProjects, I think a lot of people might say it was me. I've created and at least laid the foundations for a lot of them. I'd be more than willing to offer any help I might be able to on any topic, whether \"Project\" size or not, that you thought you'd like to work on. Like I said, my writing sucks, and being given something to do that I can do fairly well makes me feel a bit useful once in a while too. If you ever do find any topics that really do interest you, and you want a little help finding or structuring the content, plesse let me know. I'd be more than happy to do whatever I could.  +++$+++ ::::::::If there were any topics you did find interesting that weren't well developed, if you provided a bit of a focus for others to collect around, you might well be able to actually make the content on those topics something we could all be proud of. And I mean the entire content, not just those articles that are close to DYK, GA, or FA. That is, of course, if you found any subjects that really interest you. All I'm really asking is that you, basically, keep your eyes open. If there is one editor around here who basically knows the extant WikiProjects, I think a lot of people might say it was me. I've created and at least laid the foundations for a lot of them. I'd be more than willing to offer any help I might be able to on any topic, whether "Project" size or not, that you thought you'd like to work on. Like I said, my writing sucks, and being given something to do that I can do fairly well makes me feel a bit useful once in a while too. If you ever do find any topics that really do interest you, and you want a little help finding or structuring the content, plesse let me know. I'd be more than happy to do whatever I could. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 03:05, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271066 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271065 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.255641780E09 +++$+++ Like I tried to indicate with my first username, \"warlordjohncarter\", I can be more than a bit of a belligerent bastard. I know from experience that there are some things I have been pretty good at in general that I now avoid because of the occasional negative consequencs for me or others. Maybe the time has come to admit that, while you were good at reviews, you might have been a little too personally invested in them at times, and that as a result they weren't as much of a positive to you peronally as you might have told yourself. God knows I found that out myself during my days in the student council and related activities in high school. I try to avoid \"governmental\" actions these days as a result. That doesn't mean that I can't do things related to the same basic subjects, but I do try to avoid taking on the \"power\" that comes with some of those responsibilities, because having to always remain on your toes about your own conduct got to me after a while. Maybe the time has come for you to admit the same to yourself, if you think that it applies. No one would ask you to be a \"work horse\", like you said earlier, but I believe we would all welcome input in developing weak content in any area. And God knows there is enough weak content out there. I'm at least marginally involved in all the geographical WikiProjects out there, and peripherally involved in a lot of the social and cultural ones. Almost literally ever one of them is comparatively undermanned. If you had any interest in any of those topics, and wanted to help develop the content, I;m sure the editors active in that area would be ore than happy to take any contributions you might want to make. Finally, maybe a bit belatedly, I tink I might actually really be shutting up now. Sorry for taking up so much space on your talk page.  +++$+++ :::::::::Like I tried to indicate with my first username, "warlordjohncarter", I can be more than a bit of a belligerent bastard. I know from experience that there are some things I have been pretty good at in general that I now avoid because of the occasional negative consequencs for me or others. Maybe the time has come to admit that, while you were good at reviews, you might have been a little too personally invested in them at times, and that as a result they weren't as much of a positive to you peronally as you might have told yourself. God knows I found that out myself during my days in the student council and related activities in high school. I try to avoid "governmental" actions these days as a result. That doesn't mean that I can't do things related to the same basic subjects, but I do try to avoid taking on the "power" that comes with some of those responsibilities, because having to always remain on your toes about your own conduct got to me after a while. Maybe the time has come for you to admit the same to yourself, if you think that it applies. No one would ask you to be a "work horse", like you said earlier, but I believe we would all welcome input in developing weak content in any area. And God knows there is enough weak content out there. I'm at least marginally involved in all the geographical WikiProjects out there, and peripherally involved in a lot of the social and cultural ones. Almost literally ever one of them is comparatively undermanned. If you had any interest in any of those topics, and wanted to help develop the content, I;m sure the editors active in that area would be ore than happy to take any contributions you might want to make. Finally, maybe a bit belatedly, I tink I might actually really be shutting up now. Sorry for taking up so much space on your talk page. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 14:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
271067 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271066 +++$+++ 2009-10-24 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.256369700E09 +++$+++ Cirt ran to AN\/I within minutes of his post of disagreement about the article. That was not right. In general, my opinion on the article was supported by others. He was, as you say, a bit of a \"belligerent\" person. People do not take well to honest criticism of their articles. Fluffy, \"nice nice\" evaluators do better on wikipedia, but is the fluffy \"nice nice\"  comments the best way to obtain quality articles, or is it a way to let junk get the \"banners\" of \"wikipedia's best\" or \"good article\" status ? Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::::::::Cirt ran to AN/I within minutes of his post of disagreement about the article. That was not right. In general, my opinion on the article was supported by others. He was, as you say, a bit of a "belligerent" person. People do not take well to honest criticism of their articles. Fluffy, "nice nice" evaluators do better on wikipedia, but is the fluffy "nice nice"  comments the best way to obtain quality articles, or is it a way to let junk get the "banners" of "wikipedia's best" or "good article" status ? Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:35, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
271068 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271057 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.251510360E09 +++$+++ Further diffs, accusations of stalking, personalizing and derailing FAR discussions, failure to AGF, pointy posts, edit warring, and accusations of a class sytems and cabalism, '' all after the ArbCom closed'':  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=301466088&oldid=301464944], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:SandyGeorgia&diff=prev&oldid=307784914], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=prev&oldid=307667527], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=prev&oldid=307666886], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=prev&oldid=307617817], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=James_Joyce&diff=prev&oldid=307612243], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=prev&oldid=307545154], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=prev&oldid=307563697], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:YellowMonkey&curid=10494883&diff=307857880&oldid=307854583].  Any one of these diffs, taken alone, is not highly problematic, but taken in the context of your ArbCom and Plan, show that you still haven't understood what behaviors lead you to trouble.  What concerns me most is that your mentors (with the exception of Malleus) have often turned a blind eye rather than helping you understand. Do they not understand that there are enough diffs showing that the problems have continued to justify re-opening the ArbCom?  They aren't helping you if they don't point this out.  Mattisse, I hope you will take a few weeks off, completely walk away for a while, and re-think your approach to Wiki.  +++$+++ :: Further diffs, accusations of stalking, personalizing and derailing FAR discussions, failure to AGF, pointy posts, edit warring, and accusations of a class sytems and cabalism, '' all after the ArbCom closed'':  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=301466088&oldid=301464944], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SandyGeorgia&diff=prev&oldid=307784914], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=prev&oldid=307667527], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=prev&oldid=307666886], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=prev&oldid=307617817], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Joyce&diff=prev&oldid=307612243], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=prev&oldid=307545154], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review&diff=prev&oldid=307563697], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:YellowMonkey&curid=10494883&diff=307857880&oldid=307854583].  Any one of these diffs, taken alone, is not highly problematic, but taken in the context of your ArbCom and Plan, show that you still haven't understood what behaviors lead you to trouble.  What concerns me most is that your mentors (with the exception of Malleus) have often turned a blind eye rather than helping you understand. Do they not understand that there are enough diffs showing that the problems have continued to justify re-opening the ArbCom?  They aren't helping you if they don't point this out.  Mattisse, I hope you will take a few weeks off, completely walk away for a while, and re-think your approach to Wiki. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
271069 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.251524280E09 +++$+++ If at any time in future you feel that Mattisse is engaging in unseemly conduct, it might be helpful to contact myself or any of the others who signed up to the plan. We could look into it, and give Mattisse our views on what is happening. If you or others do not alert us to potential problems then in all likelihood we will miss it, as we are not watching Mattisse, nor have we been required to do that. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :If at any time in future you feel that Mattisse is engaging in unseemly conduct, it might be helpful to contact myself or any of the others who signed up to the plan. We could look into it, and give Mattisse our views on what is happening. If you or others do not alert us to potential problems then in all likelihood we will miss it, as we are not watching Mattisse, nor have we been required to do that. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 22:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
271070 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271069 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.251524820E09 +++$+++ and yet, none of you can monitor her ''own user talk page''?  She just created these three sections, aimed at me (remember the Plan ... no plague lists ... ) with a derogatory and false edit summary,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=310597684&oldid=310597132] and unless you've done it privately (which seems counterproductive), no one yet has called her on it. I rest my case.  I have ''no intentions'' of taking this back channel, where none of us knows if any of you are doing anything helpful.  EVERY instance I have pointed out is on pages I have, and must because of my ''\"job\"'' as FA delegate, routinely followed for years, yet she continues to allege stalking and you all continue to overlook breaches of her plan ''posted to her own talk page''.  At a minimum, I would think her mentors would notice breaches of her plan on her own talk page, and this is more than once that she's done it.  +++$+++ :: and yet, none of you can monitor her ''own user talk page''?  She just created these three sections, aimed at me (remember the Plan ... no plague lists ... ) with a derogatory and false edit summary,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=310597684&oldid=310597132] and unless you've done it privately (which seems counterproductive), no one yet has called her on it. I rest my case.  I have ''no intentions'' of taking this back channel, where none of us knows if any of you are doing anything helpful.  EVERY instance I have pointed out is on pages I have, and must because of my ''"job"'' as FA delegate, routinely followed for years, yet she continues to allege stalking and you all continue to overlook breaches of her plan ''posted to her own talk page''.  At a minimum, I would think her mentors would notice breaches of her plan on her own talk page, and this is more than once that she's done it. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
271071 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271056 +++$+++ 271070 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.251525840E09 +++$+++ I did send this, however, in my last message sent on August 18: \"By all of her mentors refusing to step in and tell her that she is wrong, you marginalize the efforts of good editors like ... and further reinforce the same problematic behavior. Why should she stop? None of her mentors have stepped in to say, 'Mattisse, no reasonable person could interpret policy this way. Participate in this discussion to improve the article or leave.' No one is taking a hard line to represent that there are issues beyond individual editors like Mattisse or me. I don't see any effort to reform disruptive behavior, just praise for neutral or good acts. That is simply not effective in any any psychological or pedagogical arena.\"  (Ellipses for other users I named.) -- +++$+++ :::I did send this, however, in my last message sent on August 18: "By all of her mentors refusing to step in and tell her that she is wrong, you marginalize the efforts of good editors like ... and further reinforce the same problematic behavior. Why should she stop? None of her mentors have stepped in to say, 'Mattisse, no reasonable person could interpret policy this way. Participate in this discussion to improve the article or leave.' No one is taking a hard line to represent that there are issues beyond individual editors like Mattisse or me. I don't see any effort to reform disruptive behavior, just praise for neutral or good acts. That is simply not effective in any any psychological or pedagogical arena."  (Ellipses for other users I named.) --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 23:04, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

533203 +++$+++ Beamathan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-10 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.207885620E09 +++$+++ Or not ;) But seriously, I'm impressed at your ability to be so calm in the face of blatant bias, where as I lose my cool (slightly) and act like an asshole (definitely). Anyway, just wanted to give you some well deserved positivity. :)  +++$+++ Or not ;) But seriously, I'm impressed at your ability to be so calm in the face of blatant bias, where as I lose my cool (slightly) and act like an asshole (definitely). Anyway, just wanted to give you some well deserved positivity. :) [[User:Beamathan|Beam]] 20:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
533204 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533203 +++$+++ 533203 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.207886460E09 +++$+++ Haha, I see you still have a good sense of sarcasm :-) Well, I suppose the best thing to act when the debate is heated (the way I do it) is to write an answer, read it again and then close the browser without posting. It vents out some negative energy and does not add even more heat to the discussion. Hope that helps... Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : Haha, I see you still have a good sense of sarcasm :-) Well, I suppose the best thing to act when the debate is heated (the way I do it) is to write an answer, read it again and then close the browser without posting. It vents out some negative energy and does not add even more heat to the discussion. Hope that helps... Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
533205 +++$+++ Beamathan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533203 +++$+++ 533204 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.207896480E09 +++$+++ That would definitely help if I had that ability. But I type something up as fast as I can, than hit tab a couple of times and smash the space bar to post it as soon as I can. That way all my anger and riff raff gets vented AND posted. It's a method that I'm still perfecting, obviously.  +++$+++ ::That would definitely help if I had that ability. But I type something up as fast as I can, than hit tab a couple of times and smash the space bar to post it as soon as I can. That way all my anger and riff raff gets vented AND posted. It's a method that I'm still perfecting, obviously. [[User:Beamathan|Beam]] 23:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

8916 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-11 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.171250400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions! ''' +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions! '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 19:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
8917 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8916 +++$+++ 8916 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.171282440E09 +++$+++ Woot!!! -- +++$+++ :Woot!!! --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 04:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

8918 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-12 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.171292820E09 +++$+++ Hope that helps explain things!  +++$+++ Hope that helps explain things! [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 07:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
8919 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8918 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.171292940E09 +++$+++ It's not a \"battle.\" Stop changing it to a battle. It's an ongoing operation, mostly non-combat-oriented. -- +++$+++ ::It's not a "battle." Stop changing it to a battle. It's an ongoing operation, mostly non-combat-oriented. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 07:09, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
8920 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8918 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.171293120E09 +++$+++ In other words: I'm not arguing that it ''is'' a battle; merely that if it's a ''combat operation'', it gets placed in the ''same'' category as battles do.  +++$+++ :::In other words: I'm not arguing that it ''is'' a battle; merely that if it's a ''combat operation'', it gets placed in the ''same'' category as battles do. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 07:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
8921 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8918 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.171293900E09 +++$+++ Your mode of thinking is rather narrow-minded. Two (2) military strikes have occurred in the theatre of operations defined under OEF-HOA. A number of other [[Military Operations Other Than War]] (MOOTW) have also occurred, such as anti-piracy interdictions. There have also been numerous civil-military operations and humanitarian missions. So the answer is that it is both a combat operation ''and'' a non-military operation. However, it's neither a \"battle\" nor a \"war.\" I'm not one given to simply pigeon-hole article because guidelines are that -- guidelines. They are not to be used to shoe-horn or misinterpret truth. -- +++$+++ :::::Your mode of thinking is rather narrow-minded. Two (2) military strikes have occurred in the theatre of operations defined under OEF-HOA. A number of other [[Military Operations Other Than War]] (MOOTW) have also occurred, such as anti-piracy interdictions. There have also been numerous civil-military operations and humanitarian missions. So the answer is that it is both a combat operation ''and'' a non-military operation. However, it's neither a "battle" nor a "war." I'm not one given to simply pigeon-hole article because guidelines are that -- guidelines. They are not to be used to shoe-horn or misinterpret truth. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 07:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
8922 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8918 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.171329780E09 +++$+++ (The background: given that this issue has come up before, [[WP:MILHIST]] is now planning a set of renamings of the form \"Battles involving X\" \u2192 \"Battles and combat operations involving X\", to avoid having to argue over whether something is a \"battle\" or not; and I'm wondering if that will resolve this particular issue or not.)  +++$+++ ::::::(The background: given that this issue has come up before, [[WP:MILHIST]] is now planning a set of renamings of the form "Battles involving X" → "Battles and combat operations involving X", to avoid having to argue over whether something is a "battle" or not; and I'm wondering if that will resolve this particular issue or not.) [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 17:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
8923 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8918 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.171338720E09 +++$+++ I'd be content to put it under both [[:Category:Military operations involving the United States]] and [[:Category:Non-combat military operations involving the United States]], since though there were two (2) combat air strikes, the vast majority of OEF-HOA's activities have been MOOTW. So both of those categories are true of OEF-HOA. Just don't put it under a \"battle\" or a \"war\" since it is neither of those. I'm not sure I like the wierd complex renaming \"Battles and combat operations involving X\". There are battles. There are military campaigns. There are wars. What is lacking in your heirarchy is a \"campaign\" ([[:Category:Military_campaigns]]) which is a series of battles in an overall war. Many operations are limited to a single battle. Some operations are related to an overall campaign. Some operations comprise an entire war. Other operations are not a battle, nor a campaign, nor a war. So... It depends. If I had the choice of \"battle,\" \"campaign\" or \"war,\" the closest analogy OEF-HOA would relate to would be a \"campaign.\" Sans \"campaign,\" leave it simply as an \"operation\", both military and non-military. -- +++$+++ :::::::I'd be content to put it under both [[:Category:Military operations involving the United States]] and [[:Category:Non-combat military operations involving the United States]], since though there were two (2) combat air strikes, the vast majority of OEF-HOA's activities have been MOOTW. So both of those categories are true of OEF-HOA. Just don't put it under a "battle" or a "war" since it is neither of those. I'm not sure I like the wierd complex renaming "Battles and combat operations involving X". There are battles. There are military campaigns. There are wars. What is lacking in your heirarchy is a "campaign" ([[:Category:Military_campaigns]]) which is a series of battles in an overall war. Many operations are limited to a single battle. Some operations are related to an overall campaign. Some operations comprise an entire war. Other operations are not a battle, nor a campaign, nor a war. So... It depends. If I had the choice of "battle," "campaign" or "war," the closest analogy OEF-HOA would relate to would be a "campaign." Sans "campaign," leave it simply as an "operation", both military and non-military. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 19:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
8924 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8918 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.171293600E09 +++$+++ And, incidentally, if you're arguing that it's a non-combat operation, you might want to check whether the casualty counts in the infobox are actually related to it; having 2,500+ casualties almost certainly qualifies it as a \"combat operation\" that the U.S. is involved in (even if the U.S. isn't responsible for most of them).  +++$+++ ::::And, incidentally, if you're arguing that it's a non-combat operation, you might want to check whether the casualty counts in the infobox are actually related to it; having 2,500+ casualties almost certainly qualifies it as a "combat operation" that the U.S. is involved in (even if the U.S. isn't responsible for most of them). [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 07:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
8925 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8918 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.171293900E09 +++$+++ I have argued that the \"casualties\" listed on the OEF-HOA page (carried over from CJTF-HOA) are an utter misattribution, since they are a \"double-dipping\" of the casualties listed under the [[Second Battle of Mogadishu]] and the [[Rise of the Islamic Courts Union (2006)]]. Nothing that happened in Somalia, aside from the two U.S. airstrikes, have anything to do with OEF-HOA on an official basis. Hence, I have argued strenuously in the past to ''remove'' those casualty figures. -- +++$+++ :::::I have argued that the "casualties" listed on the OEF-HOA page (carried over from CJTF-HOA) are an utter misattribution, since they are a "double-dipping" of the casualties listed under the [[Second Battle of Mogadishu]] and the [[Rise of the Islamic Courts Union (2006)]]. Nothing that happened in Somalia, aside from the two U.S. airstrikes, have anything to do with OEF-HOA on an official basis. Hence, I have argued strenuously in the past to ''remove'' those casualty figures. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 07:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

307321 +++$+++ Sweetfornow +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 307321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-16 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.253120640E09 +++$+++ And about this article: [[Terry Evanswood]]: Don't write whatever you want. Don't assume that you see a link and think that the article is fully cited. Go click on the links. If the link that does not reference the article, then adding additional info will be removed, regarding this policy: [[WP: LIBEL]]  +++$+++ And about this article: [[Terry Evanswood]]: Don't write whatever you want. Don't assume that you see a link and think that the article is fully cited. Go click on the links. If the link that does not reference the article, then adding additional info will be removed, regarding this policy: [[WP: LIBEL]] [[User:Sweetfornow|Sweetfornow]] ([[User talk:Sweetfornow|talk]]) 10:04, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
307322 +++$+++ Sweetfornow +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 307321 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.253125740E09 +++$+++ I checked all the links. I click through every single one of them. I read the content. I only deleted the links that doesn't reference the info on the Wiki pages.   +++$+++ ::I checked all the links. I click through every single one of them. I read the content. I only deleted the links that doesn't reference the info on the Wiki pages.  [[User:Sweetfornow|Sweetfornow]] ([[User talk:Sweetfornow|talk]]) 11:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

533208 +++$+++ Beamathan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533208 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-12 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.207995840E09 +++$+++ Tone, even if it isn't \"widely accepted\" English version, ANY English version should be preferred over a Serbian\/Albanian\/JupiterSpeak version.  +++$+++ Tone, even if it isn't "widely accepted" English version, ANY English version should be preferred over a Serbian/Albanian/JupiterSpeak version. [[User:Beamathan|Beam]] 03:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
533209 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533208 +++$+++ 533208 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.208050020E09 +++$+++ Hi. So, here's the thing. You are very welcome to add references and fix the article to suit the standards. In order not to get it speedy deleted again, I suggest you fix it in your userspace. So if you agree, I can copy the content to your user talk page, you work on it and repost it when finished. Tell me. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. So, here's the thing. You are very welcome to add references and fix the article to suit the standards. In order not to get it speedy deleted again, I suggest you fix it in your userspace. So if you agree, I can copy the content to your user talk page, you work on it and repost it when finished. Tell me. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:27, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
533210 +++$+++ 213.84.53.62 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533208 +++$+++ 533209 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.208051820E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/213.84.53.62|213.84.53.62]] ( +++$+++ ::[[Special:Contributions/213.84.53.62|213.84.53.62]] ([[User talk:213.84.53.62|talk]]) 18:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
533211 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533208 +++$+++ 533210 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.208052120E09 +++$+++ I must be tired, this was indeed funny wording... anyway, ok, I'll restore the article and I wish you good work :-) If you have any problems with editing, feel free to ask. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ ::: I must be tired, this was indeed funny wording... anyway, ok, I'll restore the article and I wish you good work :-) If you have any problems with editing, feel free to ask. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

533212 +++$+++ Grant.Alpaugh +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533212 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-14 10:17:00 +++$+++ 1.208193420E09 +++$+++ Hey there are like 3-4 items from the past few days at ITN\/C that have consensus to go up, and no one has done so.  Can you please check it out?  The Haiti story, the Korean story, and the Masters results, have consensus.  The new Australian Gov-Gen is iffy.  Thanks for helping.  --  ''' +++$+++ Hey there are like 3-4 items from the past few days at ITN/C that have consensus to go up, and no one has done so.  Can you please check it out?  The Haiti story, the Korean story, and the Masters results, have consensus.  The new Australian Gov-Gen is iffy.  Thanks for helping.  --  '''[[User:Grant.Alpaugh|<font color="#BF0A30">Grant</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Grant.Alpaugh|<font color="#FFFFFF">.</font>]][[User talk:Grant.Alpaugh|<font color="#002868">Alpaugh</font>]]''' 10:17, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
533213 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533212 +++$+++ 533212 +++$+++ 2008-04-20 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.208714520E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was ok, but there was no assertion why this house is notable... Were there any famous people living in? Is it a nice example of some architectural style?... And also, there are no sources, hence no chance to verify the information. If you can address these issues, I will gladly restore the article. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was ok, but there was no assertion why this house is notable... Were there any famous people living in? Is it a nice example of some architectural style?... And also, there are no sources, hence no chance to verify the information. If you can address these issues, I will gladly restore the article. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:02, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
533214 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533212 +++$+++ 533212 +++$+++ 2008-04-20 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.208714520E09 +++$+++ The article was deelted in a prod process, since you object, I have restored it. By the way, the image in the article was deelted as well, maybe you would like to add a new one (and don't forget the licences and stuff.) Regards. --''' +++$+++ : The article was deelted in a prod process, since you object, I have restored it. By the way, the image in the article was deelted as well, maybe you would like to add a new one (and don't forget the licences and stuff.) Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:02, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

8927 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8927 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-15 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.171554840E09 +++$+++ into making the [[Battle of Cieneguilla]] a better article.  I was not really looking for a critique of the article, or lack of one -  if someone does not like it they are free to delete it - rather I was using it as an entry point for getting your opinion as to where the edges of [[original research]] might be and also your thoughts on the archeologist issue.  I appreciate your time and energy in collecting those web sites and for responding to my questions.   +++$+++ into making the [[Battle of Cieneguilla]] a better article.  I was not really looking for a critique of the article, or lack of one -  if someone does not like it they are free to delete it - rather I was using it as an entry point for getting your opinion as to where the edges of [[original research]] might be and also your thoughts on the archeologist issue.  I appreciate your time and energy in collecting those web sites and for responding to my questions.  [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] 07:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
8928 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8927 +++$+++ 8927 +++$+++ 2007-02-15 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.171559100E09 +++$+++ Most welcome! Once a subject comes up to my attention, I tend to get interested. I think it would make a good article. As for the \"original research,\" you know the answer to that already. :) -- +++$+++ :Most welcome! Once a subject comes up to my attention, I tend to get interested. I think it would make a good article. As for the "original research," you know the answer to that already. :) --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 09:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

271072 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.251526860E09 +++$+++ ]&mdash; +++$+++ ]&mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
271073 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271072 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.251527700E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure bitter can quite accurately characterize the way I view you or my own actions. I am now deeply regretting I ever attempted to encourage any leeway during your ArbCom case. I considered my own anger at your preposterous posts that landed you at ArbCom to be as much a personal failing as it was your own astonishingly bad judgment. Call it what you will: idealism, optimism, or idiocy that I truly thought you would want to participate here to improve content and not use policy or review processes to pursue your personal and imaginary vendettas against other editors. You included me on your Torture list for your own reasons that only you can fathom. I don't know how you could possibly dig yourself further into the hole you're in, but listing all the times I have persecuted you will make it deeper. I didn't think I should have to remind anyone with your experience what GA criteria actually were, but I was wrong. So I should remind you that you have requested an admin post that you are retired. You continue to post here, very much like #6 in your ArbCom complaint. -- +++$+++ :::::I'm not sure bitter can quite accurately characterize the way I view you or my own actions. I am now deeply regretting I ever attempted to encourage any leeway during your ArbCom case. I considered my own anger at your preposterous posts that landed you at ArbCom to be as much a personal failing as it was your own astonishingly bad judgment. Call it what you will: idealism, optimism, or idiocy that I truly thought you would want to participate here to improve content and not use policy or review processes to pursue your personal and imaginary vendettas against other editors. You included me on your Torture list for your own reasons that only you can fathom. I don't know how you could possibly dig yourself further into the hole you're in, but listing all the times I have persecuted you will make it deeper. I didn't think I should have to remind anyone with your experience what GA criteria actually were, but I was wrong. So I should remind you that you have requested an admin post that you are retired. You continue to post here, very much like #6 in your ArbCom complaint. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 23:35, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
271074 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271072 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.251528360E09 +++$+++ I would say \"bitter\" characterizes your appearance from my point of view. Because I requested clarification of a legal statement in your [[Harvey Milk]] FA, you have posted against me at every opportunity and became, considering your involvement with me, overly emeshed in my arbitration. Now you have posted on my talk page and here because of one GAR that did not go your way. And I was not the decision maker on that GAR. I merely posted an opinion and you dragged to my personal talk page. I would say that is not neutral behavior.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::I would say "bitter" characterizes your appearance from my point of view. Because I requested clarification of a legal statement in your [[Harvey Milk]] FA, you have posted against me at every opportunity and became, considering your involvement with me, overly emeshed in my arbitration. Now you have posted on my talk page and here because of one GAR that did not go your way. And I was not the decision maker on that GAR. I merely posted an opinion and you dragged to my personal talk page. I would say that is not neutral behavior.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
271075 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271072 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.251529500E09 +++$+++ And I would appreciate no personal attacks, Moni3 as you did above. I know that you think I am fair game, but still. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=310624309&oldid=310623620] &mdash; +++$+++ :::::::And I would appreciate no personal attacks, Moni3 as you did above. I know that you think I am fair game, but still. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=310624309&oldid=310623620] &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:05, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
271076 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271072 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.251525180E09 +++$+++ I think the message is quite clear. If I dare to come back there is another Arbitration coming. I do not have the foresight or the will or the ability to collect diffs like Sandy does. As you can see, if I say anything, that is grounds for her collection. There is no way I can survive on Wikipedia in the future. She is using my talk page to start the arbitration. The wonderful world of Wikipedia. Where does [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] come in. Were my comments, posted above by Sandy and probably culled from 15,000 edits or so since the arbitration, really that bad (if you really do [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]? Why do they all have to do with FAR when YellowMonkey has had no complaints?  Well, I am done for, obviously. Attack me, attack my panel, attack arbcom. If I did that I would be blocked all over again.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::I think the message is quite clear. If I dare to come back there is another Arbitration coming. I do not have the foresight or the will or the ability to collect diffs like Sandy does. As you can see, if I say anything, that is grounds for her collection. There is no way I can survive on Wikipedia in the future. She is using my talk page to start the arbitration. The wonderful world of Wikipedia. Where does [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] come in. Were my comments, posted above by Sandy and probably culled from 15,000 edits or so since the arbitration, really that bad (if you really do [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]? Why do they all have to do with FAR when YellowMonkey has had no complaints?  Well, I am done for, obviously. Attack me, attack my panel, attack arbcom. If I did that I would be blocked all over again.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
271077 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271072 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.251526140E09 +++$+++ What AGF actually says: ''This guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of contrary evidence. Assuming good faith does not prohibit discussion and criticism, but instead editors should not attribute the actions being criticized to malice unless there is specific evidence of malice.'' -- +++$+++ :::What AGF actually says: ''This guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of contrary evidence. Assuming good faith does not prohibit discussion and criticism, but instead editors should not attribute the actions being criticized to malice unless there is specific evidence of malice.'' --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 23:09, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
271078 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271072 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.251527040E09 +++$+++ I think that applies equally to you and SandyGeorgia. I think the arbcom saw that in your comments there. I am to blame for all the failures, bad feelings, lack of reviews, etc at FA, FAR, GA, GAR, as you both have made clear. Do you think driving me off of Wikipedia will solve all you problems?  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I think that applies equally to you and SandyGeorgia. I think the arbcom saw that in your comments there. I am to blame for all the failures, bad feelings, lack of reviews, etc at FA, FAR, GA, GAR, as you both have made clear. Do you think driving me off of Wikipedia will solve all you problems?  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
271079 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271072 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.251525960E09 +++$+++ If it isn't inappropriate to offer a few words, experienced mentors often find it difficult to keep up with unexpected developments. This included a mentorship where the other two-thirds of the team included a steward and an administrator who later got elected to ArbCom. Things can happen quickly in wiki-time. It really does help to give a mentor a heads-up. Today, for example, my sole remaining mentoree got warned by two administrators for altering another person's posts. The actual problem was probably a ban-evading post by a sitebanned user, which neither of those administrators knew about and the mentoree did not know how to articulate. None of them thought to notify me. I left a followup message at the mentoree's user talk and have been debating whether it's worth the trouble to chase down both administrators. An ounce of prevention is usually worth a pound of cure in these situations. That might not help today's dilemma, but here's hoping it's useful in future. With respect extended toward all parties, <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::If it isn't inappropriate to offer a few words, experienced mentors often find it difficult to keep up with unexpected developments. This included a mentorship where the other two-thirds of the team included a steward and an administrator who later got elected to ArbCom. Things can happen quickly in wiki-time. It really does help to give a mentor a heads-up. Today, for example, my sole remaining mentoree got warned by two administrators for altering another person's posts. The actual problem was probably a ban-evading post by a sitebanned user, which neither of those administrators knew about and the mentoree did not know how to articulate. None of them thought to notify me. I left a followup message at the mentoree's user talk and have been debating whether it's worth the trouble to chase down both administrators. An ounce of prevention is usually worth a pound of cure in these situations. That might not help today's dilemma, but here's hoping it's useful in future. With respect extended toward all parties, <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|306]]''</sup> 23:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
271080 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271072 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.251529980E09 +++$+++ I request that Moni3 withdraw or strike her personal attacks above. She has a history of personally attacking me on my own talk page as well as other places. e.g.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=308309700&oldid=308286350] and refusing the requests of others to withdraw them.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=308315254&oldid=308309700] &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I request that Moni3 withdraw or strike her personal attacks above. She has a history of personally attacking me on my own talk page as well as other places. e.g.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=308309700&oldid=308286350] and refusing the requests of others to withdraw them.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=308315254&oldid=308309700] &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:13, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

533218 +++$+++ Muddyb Blast Producer +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-23 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.208975460E09 +++$+++ Hello, Tone. Could please tell me further about deletion of Frank Zagarino article? Don't tell me you don't know him, cause I know is famous arround the world. And I believe when you start an article, not only your self can make it completely, some one else will come and put those thing which are needed in article. Tha article I try to provide all things which are needed to be in any article, such external links-etc. This i s real dishertening me to move forward and contribute an article here. Thats not good. -- +++$+++ Hello, Tone. Could please tell me further about deletion of Frank Zagarino article? Don't tell me you don't know him, cause I know is famous arround the world. And I believe when you start an article, not only your self can make it completely, some one else will come and put those thing which are needed in article. Tha article I try to provide all things which are needed to be in any article, such external links-etc. This i s real dishertening me to move forward and contribute an article here. Thats not good. --[[User:Muddyb Blast Producer|Muddyb Blast Producer]] ([[User talk:Muddyb Blast Producer|talk]]) 11:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
533219 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533218 +++$+++ 533218 +++$+++ 2008-04-23 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.208975940E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted in a standard prod process. The problem stated was ''No context, no evidence of notability''. You see, the article needs to establish why is he notable (played in notable films, won awards, media coverage...). And you need references for that. The only content was that he's an actor and when is his birthday. So if you can provide more information, I will gladly restore the article. The WP process indeed is supposed to work like someone starts an article and others expand it, however, the beginning article should not be a micro-stub but at least include some content. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted in a standard prod process. The problem stated was ''No context, no evidence of notability''. You see, the article needs to establish why is he notable (played in notable films, won awards, media coverage...). And you need references for that. The only content was that he's an actor and when is his birthday. So if you can provide more information, I will gladly restore the article. The WP process indeed is supposed to work like someone starts an article and others expand it, however, the beginning article should not be a micro-stub but at least include some content. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

8931 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8931 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-15 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.171602120E09 +++$+++ I have to give you a big thumbs-up also! Nice job. -- +++$+++ I have to give you a big thumbs-up also! Nice job. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 21:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
8932 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8931 +++$+++ 8931 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.171652700E09 +++$+++ Thanks Peter. -- '' +++$+++ :Thanks Peter. -- ''[[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">Szvest</font></font>]]'' - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up ®''</sup></font>]]</small> 11:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

533220 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-23 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.209003120E09 +++$+++ Hi. The reason for deletion (prod process) was ''No evidence of notability; fails [[WP:PRODUCT]]''. I am not sure about the rest of the articles on the list you mention, I'll ask someone to check them. We'll see what to do then. Regards. --''' +++$+++ Hi. The reason for deletion (prod process) was ''No evidence of notability; fails [[WP:PRODUCT]]''. I am not sure about the rest of the articles on the list you mention, I'll ask someone to check them. We'll see what to do then. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
533221 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533220 +++$+++ 533220 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.209093660E09 +++$+++ Must have been a misunderstanding, notability is stated. I have recreated the article. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Must have been a misunderstanding, notability is stated. I have recreated the article. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
533222 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533220 +++$+++ 533221 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.209093720E09 +++$+++ However, the article is unreferenced. Please, provide some references and some additional content would be useful as well. --''' +++$+++ :: However, the article is unreferenced. Please, provide some references and some additional content would be useful as well. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

8933 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8933 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.171672680E09 +++$+++ I was grateful to see your vote for me. Regardless of who gets appointed as a MilHist AC, I look forward to working with you over the coming year. Rock on! -- +++$+++ I was grateful to see your vote for me. Regardless of who gets appointed as a MilHist AC, I look forward to working with you over the coming year. Rock on! --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 16:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
8934 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8933 +++$+++ 8933 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.171673460E09 +++$+++ I was astonished when i found out that i hadn't voted for you before. I thought i had done it before! Working w\/ you is my pleasure as well. -- '' +++$+++ :I was astonished when i found out that i hadn't voted for you before. I thought i had done it before! Working w/ you is my pleasure as well. -- ''[[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]]'' - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up ®''</sup></font>]]</small> 16:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
8935 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8933 +++$+++ 8933 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.171673640E09 +++$+++ Thanks muchly. The list of candidates is strong. I'm pleased to be near the top 7. Even if I don't get in, I'm quite happy to support all those who are appointed. Best of luck! -- +++$+++ :Thanks muchly. The list of candidates is strong. I'm pleased to be near the top 7. Even if I don't get in, I'm quite happy to support all those who are appointed. Best of luck! --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 16:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

8936 +++$+++ MarshallBagramyan +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8936 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.172031360E09 +++$+++ Hey Peter, so what becomes of the article? Most of the voters have voiced support for the article so....Their's some minor issues on the NK War talk page regarding the article's sources but I believe we've gone over it several times over. If you can just input your opinion on both issues (FAC candidacy and sources on Talk Page), it would be much appreciated. Good job on your appointment, regards -- +++$+++ Hey Peter, so what becomes of the article? Most of the voters have voiced support for the article so....Their's some minor issues on the NK War talk page regarding the article's sources but I believe we've gone over it several times over. If you can just input your opinion on both issues (FAC candidacy and sources on Talk Page), it would be much appreciated. Good job on your appointment, regards --[[User:MarshallBagramyan|MarshallBagramyan]] 20:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
8937 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8936 +++$+++ 8936 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.172042820E09 +++$+++ That's a good question. Just reading over the list of supports and oppositions, there is no clear consensus. However, some of those oppositions seemed partisan to me, and others seemed out of date by the end of the debate and the revisions the article went through. Unfortunately, that might fail it for FA status based upon instability. But let's see what others say. -- +++$+++ :That's a good question. Just reading over the list of supports and oppositions, there is no clear consensus. However, some of those oppositions seemed partisan to me, and others seemed out of date by the end of the debate and the revisions the article went through. Unfortunately, that might fail it for FA status based upon instability. But let's see what others say. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 23:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

271081 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-01 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.251809880E09 +++$+++ You commented at the prior FAC and many issues have been resolved.  Please comment at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Crown Fountain\/archive4\u200e]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ You commented at the prior FAC and many issues have been resolved.  Please comment at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Crown Fountain/archive4‎]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 05:58, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
271082 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271081 +++$+++ 271081 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.253086860E09 +++$+++ I see you started reading this one. Let me know if there is anything we can do to get your support.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :I see you started reading this one. Let me know if there is anything we can do to get your support.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 00:41, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

8938 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-22 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.172170860E09 +++$+++ He's violated 3RR on the Sanaag article. I've warned him but it was a few hours ago. Also because I am involved in it I will not block him. SO you may need to report at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/3RR]]. Cheers.  +++$+++ He's violated 3RR on the Sanaag article. I've warned him but it was a few hours ago. Also because I am involved in it I will not block him. SO you may need to report at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR]]. Cheers. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 11:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
8939 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8938 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.172171220E09 +++$+++ True, he's violated 3RR, but he had his reasons, trying to hold to what he considered was true and factual. Rather than simply see him banned, I'd like to engage him for the good. However, after my latest additions, which show the Somaliland division more accurately (10 districts, six of which graded \"A\" through \"C\" were involved in the 2005 elections), if he continues to simply blank the section, we can escalate matters. I'd prefer to battle over who has the best citations than simply win by fiat of getting him ousted. But yes, simply reverting excisions is no fun. -- +++$+++ ::True, he's violated 3RR, but he had his reasons, trying to hold to what he considered was true and factual. Rather than simply see him banned, I'd like to engage him for the good. However, after my latest additions, which show the Somaliland division more accurately (10 districts, six of which graded "A" through "C" were involved in the 2005 elections), if he continues to simply blank the section, we can escalate matters. I'd prefer to battle over who has the best citations than simply win by fiat of getting him ousted. But yes, simply reverting excisions is no fun. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 11:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
8940 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8938 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.172171460E09 +++$+++ OK but the only thing is your edits have references. His have none on the article page.  +++$+++ :::OK but the only thing is your edits have references. His have none on the article page. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 11:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
8941 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8938 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.172171700E09 +++$+++ Quite true. He's simply blanking the section. Not good form. Let's give him some time to read over what I added tonight. If we continue to get blanked sections, we can escalate. Right now, I have to say that the additional pressure to prove my point through citations actually has taught me a bit more about the area. But his methods of editorial contribution do leave much to be desired. -- +++$+++ ::::Quite true. He's simply blanking the section. Not good form. Let's give him some time to read over what I added tonight. If we continue to get blanked sections, we can escalate. Right now, I have to say that the additional pressure to prove my point through citations actually has taught me a bit more about the area. But his methods of editorial contribution do leave much to be desired. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 11:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

271083 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271083 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-13 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.252831560E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  Hope you're doing well.  I noticed your question about warnings.  For the most part, if you go to the person's contribs., at the top of the page you'll see a link to their \"block log\".  I know it doesn't display what warnings are given, but it does give you an idea on what's going on a bit.  In Mal's case, it was a smile and a joke that Jenna posted I think.  Sometimes folks get a little silly after they've been here a while (and I'm just as guilty).  It's all in the spirit of talking to folks, being friendly, and people who have gotten to know each other just having a little fun.  There's probably a few editors that would frown on this type of behavior, but for the most part it's harmless.  Just friends enjoying their time on Wikipedia. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  Hope you're doing well.  I noticed your question about warnings.  For the most part, if you go to the person's contribs., at the top of the page you'll see a link to their "block log".  I know it doesn't display what warnings are given, but it does give you an idea on what's going on a bit.  In Mal's case, it was a smile and a joke that Jenna posted I think.  Sometimes folks get a little silly after they've been here a while (and I'm just as guilty).  It's all in the spirit of talking to folks, being friendly, and people who have gotten to know each other just having a little fun.  There's probably a few editors that would frown on this type of behavior, but for the most part it's harmless.  Just friends enjoying their time on Wikipedia. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 01:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
271084 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271083 +++$+++ 271083 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.252832400E09 +++$+++ Yes, it is nice that blocks warnings are not to be taken seriously. Sorry to have caused you to reply. I should have known that in Mal's case it was a smile and a joke, as editors are not all treated equally, depending.   I guess warnings are never to be taken at their face value.  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Yes, it is nice that blocks warnings are not to be taken seriously. Sorry to have caused you to reply. I should have known that in Mal's case it was a smile and a joke, as editors are not all treated equally, depending.   I guess warnings are never to be taken at their face value.  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
271085 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271083 +++$+++ 271084 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.252835580E09 +++$+++ Hey, you don't have to apologize to me for anything.  I ''enjoy'' talking to the folks here ;).  And it's a pleasure to meet you Mattisse! \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ ::Hey, you don't have to apologize to me for anything.  I ''enjoy'' talking to the folks here ;).  And it's a pleasure to meet you Mattisse! — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 02:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
271086 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271083 +++$+++ 271085 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.252918140E09 +++$+++ Let's just step back here for a minute Ched. All of a sudden I'm the one being castigated because of a joke that Jennavecia made on my talk page? How does that work exactly? -- +++$+++ :::Let's just step back here for a minute Ched. All of a sudden I'm the one being castigated because of a joke that Jennavecia made on my talk page? How does that work exactly? --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 01:49, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

525778 +++$+++ Grovermj +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525778 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-11 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.194784080E09 +++$+++ I assessed those articles for you, they were all start class, but [[Rory McIlroy]] and [[Martin Kaymer]] were verging on B class. I don't have hard and fast rules for assessing, except for if the article has no or very little references then the best it will rate is a start class. For example the [[Charles Howell III]] article has a fair bit of info but noo references, so I classed it as start. The other two had some good information and were fairly well referenced, but, again, were only ''just'' not a B-class article. Maybe a little more info including references and they would be pretty safe B-class articles. For something to be a B class article, for me, it should be the quality prose and relative length of [[Charles Howell III]] with fairly good referencing. As for the importance, I just assess each article as I get to it. I haven't figured out any rules for that. Anyways, hope that helps, and happy editing!  +++$+++ I assessed those articles for you, they were all start class, but [[Rory McIlroy]] and [[Martin Kaymer]] were verging on B class. I don't have hard and fast rules for assessing, except for if the article has no or very little references then the best it will rate is a start class. For example the [[Charles Howell III]] article has a fair bit of info but noo references, so I classed it as start. The other two had some good information and were fairly well referenced, but, again, were only ''just'' not a B-class article. Maybe a little more info including references and they would be pretty safe B-class articles. For something to be a B class article, for me, it should be the quality prose and relative length of [[Charles Howell III]] with fairly good referencing. As for the importance, I just assess each article as I get to it. I haven't figured out any rules for that. Anyways, hope that helps, and happy editing! [[User:Grovermj|Grover]] 04:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
525779 +++$+++ Grovermj +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525778 +++$+++ 525778 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.194784200E09 +++$+++ P.S. I'm glad someone is getting in with me and doing the hard yards with assessing, a bit more of this and they'll all be assessed :D. I'm keeping a running tally and at the moment it's down to about 60-61% unassessed, which is good from 83-84% a couple of months ago.  +++$+++ :P.S. I'm glad someone is getting in with me and doing the hard yards with assessing, a bit more of this and they'll all be assessed :D. I'm keeping a running tally and at the moment it's down to about 60-61% unassessed, which is good from 83-84% a couple of months ago. [[User:Grovermj|Grover]] 04:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

533230 +++$+++ TigerShark +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-28 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.209446280E09 +++$+++ Hi. Could you look again at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Undelete\/Josh_Phillips_%28actor%29 this]] please, and let me know if you are sure there is not even a reasonable indication of why the subject may be notable. Cheers  +++$+++ Hi. Could you look again at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Undelete/Josh_Phillips_%28actor%29 this]] please, and let me know if you are sure there is not even a reasonable indication of why the subject may be notable. Cheers [[User:TigerShark|TigerShark]] ([[User talk:TigerShark|talk]]) 22:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
533231 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533230 +++$+++ 533230 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.209477300E09 +++$+++ Hi. I haven't noticed you removed sd tag then. Judging from the article, it's hard to say since there are no references and I am not an expert on voice actors. Just in case, I will put it to AfD, it will be clear then. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I haven't noticed you removed sd tag then. Judging from the article, it's hard to say since there are no references and I am not an expert on voice actors. Just in case, I will put it to AfD, it will be clear then. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 06:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

271087 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-13 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.252847040E09 +++$+++ Hi, I hope you're back - so many editors appreciate your contributions to articles. If you think you're about to do something even slightly controversial, please check with one of your mentors first. If it looks like someone's trying to use you as a soft target, we'll warn them off. -- +++$+++ Hi, I hope you're back - so many editors appreciate your contributions to articles. If you think you're about to do something even slightly controversial, please check with one of your mentors first. If it looks like someone's trying to use you as a soft target, we'll warn them off. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 06:04, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
271088 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271087 +++$+++ 271087 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.252851600E09 +++$+++ Any responses would be appreciated. ''' +++$+++ :Any responses would be appreciated. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 07:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
271089 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271087 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.252892520E09 +++$+++ All good questions.  Suggest we put them on hold until we see if Mattisse is doing more than dipping a toe in the water.  I think we all want her back (or most, anyway), hitting her with 1000 kg (bricks) might not be helpful right now.-- +++$+++ :::All good questions.  Suggest we put them on hold until we see if Mattisse is doing more than dipping a toe in the water.  I think we all want her back (or most, anyway), hitting her with 1000 kg (bricks) might not be helpful right now.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 18:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

533233 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-29 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.209477540E09 +++$+++ Please close the discussion on the talk page so we can end this debacle.  For the record, I felt your closure was far too premature (3 days?) when a discussion which took place just last month, and was open for 14 days, resulted in the opposite consensus.  Also, a parallel discussion at WP:FOOTBALL was taking place which was heading, at the very least, towards no consensus to move.   +++$+++ Please close the discussion on the talk page so we can end this debacle.  For the record, I felt your closure was far too premature (3 days?) when a discussion which took place just last month, and was open for 14 days, resulted in the opposite consensus.  Also, a parallel discussion at WP:FOOTBALL was taking place which was heading, at the very least, towards no consensus to move.  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 06:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
533234 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533233 +++$+++ 533233 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.209477720E09 +++$+++ I was not aware of the paralel debate... Seemed like a rough consensus on the talkpage but I'll close it and I suppose it's better to start again if the need arises. --''' +++$+++ : I was not aware of the paralel debate... Seemed like a rough consensus on the talkpage but I'll close it and I suppose it's better to start again if the need arises. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
533235 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533233 +++$+++ 533234 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.209477780E09 +++$+++ Nor aware of how quickly you made the closure despite the previous discussion?   +++$+++ ::Nor aware of how quickly you made the closure despite the previous discussion?  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 07:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
533236 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533233 +++$+++ 533235 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.209477960E09 +++$+++ Ok, my bad. I will just leave the discussion open for a week or two, then we fix the name. Regards. --''' +++$+++ ::: Ok, my bad. I will just leave the discussion open for a week or two, then we fix the name. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
533237 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533233 +++$+++ 533236 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.209478980E09 +++$+++ Appreciated.  I know how it can be when someone asks you for a favour out of the blue.  Best.  +++$+++ ::::Appreciated.  I know how it can be when someone asks you for a favour out of the blue.  Best. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 07:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

8946 +++$+++ TomStar81 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8946 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.172479020E09 +++$+++ Congrats on your election as an assistant coordinator. In honor of your achievement, I present you with these stars. I wish you luck in the coming term.  +++$+++ Congrats on your election as an assistant coordinator. In honor of your achievement, I present you with these stars. I wish you luck in the coming term. [[User:TomStar81|TomStar81]] ([[User talk:TomStar81|Talk]]) 00:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
8947 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8946 +++$+++ 8946 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.172498460E09 +++$+++ Thanks muchly Tom! -- +++$+++ :Thanks muchly Tom! --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 06:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

8948 +++$+++ Shoreranger +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8948 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.172562900E09 +++$+++ My first! (And hopefully not my last!!)  I didn't even know about them before.  I am glad you liked my work, and I hope to improve it and do much more.  +++$+++ My first! (And hopefully not my last!!)  I didn't even know about them before.  I am glad you liked my work, and I hope to improve it and do much more. [[User:Shoreranger|Shoreranger]] 23:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
8949 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8948 +++$+++ 8948 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.172562960E09 +++$+++ You are most welcome! -- +++$+++ :You are most welcome! --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 23:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

533238 +++$+++ Magioladitis +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-29 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.209480840E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 07:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
533239 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533238 +++$+++ 533238 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I performed the merge today. -- 19:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :I performed the merge today. -- 19:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

8952 +++$+++ Grant65 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-27 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.172576880E09 +++$+++ I have added mention of France in 1939-40. The UN certainly existed during WW2; the security council did not. We need a reference for France in 1944-45, not for something that happened in 1946.  +++$+++ I have added mention of France in 1939-40. The UN certainly existed during WW2; the security council did not. We need a reference for France in 1944-45, not for something that happened in 1946. [[User:Grant65|Grant]] | [[User talk:Grant65|Talk]] 03:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
8953 +++$+++ Grant65 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8952 +++$+++ 8952 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 04:20:00 +++$+++ 1.172578800E09 +++$+++ I repeat; a reference for 1944\/45 please. If we are talking about 1946 we may as well be talking about 2006.  +++$+++ :I repeat; a reference for 1944/45 please. If we are talking about 1946 we may as well be talking about 2006. [[User:Grant65|Grant]] | [[User talk:Grant65|Talk]] 04:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
8954 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8952 +++$+++ 8953 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.172578860E09 +++$+++ Potsdam Conference is 1945. -- +++$+++ ::Potsdam Conference is 1945. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 04:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
8955 +++$+++ Grant65 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8952 +++$+++ 8954 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 05:53:00 +++$+++ 1.172584380E09 +++$+++ I have the flu at the moment, so I'm somehwat terser than I would be otherwise. Nevertheless, as I've worked on Allies of WW2 for a couple of years now, I feel somewhat protective of it. Can we please discuss major changes before you implement them?  +++$+++ :::I have the flu at the moment, so I'm somehwat terser than I would be otherwise. Nevertheless, as I've worked on Allies of WW2 for a couple of years now, I feel somewhat protective of it. Can we please discuss major changes before you implement them? [[User:Grant65|Grant]] | [[User talk:Grant65|Talk]] 05:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
8956 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8952 +++$+++ 8955 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.172589600E09 +++$+++ Surely. You also have my sympathies for your illness. I will in return ask for you to not be so defensive over articles. Recall that no one \"owns\" Wikipedia articles. -- +++$+++ ::::Surely. You also have my sympathies for your illness. I will in return ask for you to not be so defensive over articles. Recall that no one "owns" Wikipedia articles. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] 07:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

450475 +++$+++ Ikiroid +++$+++ Raichu +++$+++ 450475 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-27 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.148773380E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry everything seems to be going badly. Try to look on the bright side, and count all the good things that you have right now, things that other people don't. That's what I do. It may sound stupid, but it helps you appreciate life a lot more. I know what you mean about the userboxes, though. One of mine was speedy-deleted without anyone telling me.-- +++$+++ I'm sorry everything seems to be going badly. Try to look on the bright side, and count all the good things that you have right now, things that other people don't. That's what I do. It may sound stupid, but it helps you appreciate life a lot more. I know what you mean about the userboxes, though. One of mine was speedy-deleted without anyone telling me.--[[User:Ikiroid|<tt><b><font style="background:green" color="white">&nbsp;The ikiroid&nbsp;</font></b></tt>]] 16:43, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
450476 +++$+++ Natalya +++$+++ Raichu +++$+++ 450475 +++$+++ 450475 +++$+++ 2006-05-27 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.148776560E09 +++$+++ There's not much to say after those terribly inspiring words but to agree!Even if there are a bunch of bad things happening on Wikipedia, there's some reason you enjoy it, because you're here!I hope you decide to stay and keep contributing. -- [[User:Natalya|Nataly]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :There's not much to say after those terribly inspiring words but to agree!Even if there are a bunch of bad things happening on Wikipedia, there's some reason you enjoy it, because you're here!I hope you decide to stay and keep contributing. -- [[User:Natalya|Nataly]]<font color="green">[[User:Natalya/Esperanza|a]]</font> 17:36, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
450477 +++$+++ HighwayCello +++$+++ Raichu +++$+++ 450475 +++$+++ 450476 +++$+++ 2006-05-27 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.148775600E09 +++$+++ Please stay, I know any type of edit war is tough, but things will be better in the long run. They're planning on making a new namespace for it, and no more will be deleted unless they're sectarian\/racist etc. If you must leave it's your decision, but we wish you wouldn't. Regards, [[User:HighwayCello|H]]<font color=\"#009933\">[[User:HighwayCello\/Esperanza|ig]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::Please stay, I know any type of edit war is tough, but things will be better in the long run. They're planning on making a new namespace for it, and no more will be deleted unless they're sectarian/racist etc. If you must leave it's your decision, but we wish you wouldn't. Regards, [[User:HighwayCello|H]]<font color="#009933">[[User:HighwayCello/Esperanza|ig]]</font>[[User:HighwayCello|hway]] <sup>[[User talk:HighwayCello|Rainbow Sneakers]]</sup> 17:20, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

612288 +++$+++ Jim62sch +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-21 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.150955220E09 +++$+++ As for the coo dae it a' joke...Aaaaarrrrgggghhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!  :)  +++$+++ As for the coo dae it a' joke...Aaaaarrrrgggghhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!  :) [[User:Jim62sch|<font face="Times New Roman" color="FF2400">&#0149;Jim</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="F4C430">62</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="000000">sch&#0149;</font>]] 22:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
612289 +++$+++ Jim62sch +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612288 +++$+++ 612288 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.150955340E09 +++$+++ PS -- what are the odds anyone on that page got the Scots part of the joke?  ;)   +++$+++ :PS -- what are the odds anyone on that page got the Scots part of the joke?  ;)  [[User:Jim62sch|<font face="Times New Roman" color="FF2400">&#0149;Jim</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="F4C430">62</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="000000">sch&#0149;</font>]] 22:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
612290 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 612288 +++$+++ 612289 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.150956000E09 +++$+++ Just remembered that I found that when the E-type carrot joke was current, as in What's red in colour, has one wing, millions of arms, and udders? .. a left wing military coo...  +++$+++ ::Just remembered that I found that when the E-type carrot joke was current, as in What's red in colour, has one wing, millions of arms, and udders? .. a left wing military coo... [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 23:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

176255 +++$+++ Queenie +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176255 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-01 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.233532320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for welcoming me so many months ago. I only noticed it now, but thanks anyway! :)  +++$+++ Thanks for welcoming me so many months ago. I only noticed it now, but thanks anyway! :) [[User:Queenie|<font face="Candara" color="black">Queenie</font>]] [[User talk:Queenie|<font face="Candara" color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 15:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
176256 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176255 +++$+++ 176255 +++$+++ 2009-02-01 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.233532620E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! It took me a few seconds to realise who you were, with the change in username, but I'm very glad you decided to stay! &mdash; +++$+++ :You're welcome! It took me a few seconds to realise who you were, with the change in username, but I'm very glad you decided to stay! &mdash;[[User:BillC|<span style="background:#803020;color:white;font-variant:small-caps">'''BillC'''</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 15:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

533244 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-07 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.210146120E09 +++$+++ Hello Tone. Are you willing to submit requests for admin coaching? If so, could you be my coach? My subpage is at [[User:Editorofthewiki\/Adminship]]. Thanks for the time. '''''[[Special:Contributions\/Editorofthewiki|Editor]] +++$+++ Hello Tone. Are you willing to submit requests for admin coaching? If so, could you be my coach? My subpage is at [[User:Editorofthewiki/Adminship]]. Thanks for the time. '''''[[Special:Contributions/Editorofthewiki|Editor]][[User:Editorofthewiki|of]][[User talk:Editorofthewiki|the]][[Special:Random|wiki]]'''''<sup>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Editorofthewiki|review my edits here!]]</sup> 00:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
533245 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533244 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.210269360E09 +++$+++ What I have noticed isthat some users have a fake RFA with questions etc, like [[User:Scetoaux\/Admin coaching|this admin coaching subpage]]. '''''[[Special:Contributions\/Editorofthewiki|Editor]] +++$+++ ::What I have noticed isthat some users have a fake RFA with questions etc, like [[User:Scetoaux/Admin coaching|this admin coaching subpage]]. '''''[[Special:Contributions/Editorofthewiki|Editor]][[User:Editorofthewiki|of]][[User talk:Editorofthewiki|the]][[Special:Random|wiki]]'''''<sup>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Editorofthewiki|review my edits here!]]</sup> 10:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
533246 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533244 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-10 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.210460940E09 +++$+++ Fake RfA questions... I think it is more important to show that you can actually handle a situation as an admin instead of being able to write brilliant prose as an answer :-) But sure, I can present some imaginary situations for you to consider. --''' +++$+++ ::: Fake RfA questions... I think it is more important to show that you can actually handle a situation as an admin instead of being able to write brilliant prose as an answer :-) But sure, I can present some imaginary situations for you to consider. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

8958 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-28 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.172732880E09 +++$+++ Yup, I'd been meaning to get to that for awhile, and your edit reminded me.  :)  BTW, I've submitted a formal GA nomination for the article, though I haven't heard anything back yet.  After the article gets a bit longer though, I intend to go for FA.  So if you see anything else you'd like to add, by all means, have at it! -- +++$+++ Yup, I'd been meaning to get to that for awhile, and your edit reminded me.  :)  BTW, I've submitted a formal GA nomination for the article, though I haven't heard anything back yet.  After the article gets a bit longer though, I intend to go for FA.  So if you see anything else you'd like to add, by all means, have at it! --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 23:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
8959 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8958 +++$+++ 8958 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.172754600E09 +++$+++ I was actually just thinking, that if we could get this article revved up in time, it would be the perfect choice for the main page FA on October 13, 2007, since that would be the 700-year anniversary of Philip's arrests of all the French Templars.  Do you think that's a reasonable target date? -- +++$+++ : I was actually just thinking, that if we could get this article revved up in time, it would be the perfect choice for the main page FA on October 13, 2007, since that would be the 700-year anniversary of Philip's arrests of all the French Templars.  Do you think that's a reasonable target date? --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 05:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

271103 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271103 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-14 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.252928640E09 +++$+++ \u2190 To go back to the matter at hand, I would greatly appreciate a direct answer to my questions. Referring me to [[User:Mattisse\/Plan]] doesn't help me, because it's not clear to me how much, if any, of that plan remains operative. Significant parts of it seem to have been overtaken by events. I don't think it's too much to ask for Mattisse to at least specify ''who'' her current mentors are, as a starting point. ''' +++$+++ ← To go back to the matter at hand, I would greatly appreciate a direct answer to my questions. Referring me to [[User:Mattisse/Plan]] doesn't help me, because it's not clear to me how much, if any, of that plan remains operative. Significant parts of it seem to have been overtaken by events. I don't think it's too much to ask for Mattisse to at least specify ''who'' her current mentors are, as a starting point. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 04:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
271104 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271103 +++$+++ 271103 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.252971840E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure what your purpose is, but as suggested above, it might at this moment be more helpful if you read the ArbCom case and if still unclear, speak directly to the people mentioned in the plan you have been linked to. Those of us who agreed to sign up to the plan made it clear that it was Mattisse's decision as to when and how she contacted us for advice. None of us signed up to look over her shoulder, so if you want to get a response from somebody like myself, then my talkpage or my email would be the best place. I'm only here today to see if Mattisse has returned. I don't usually come here, and I dare say that is the case for most of the others. And if you do want to know more from me than what is given in the plan and was discussed during the case I would be interested in an explanation of your interest and your intentions because at the moment I am a little puzzled.  <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :I'm not sure what your purpose is, but as suggested above, it might at this moment be more helpful if you read the ArbCom case and if still unclear, speak directly to the people mentioned in the plan you have been linked to. Those of us who agreed to sign up to the plan made it clear that it was Mattisse's decision as to when and how she contacted us for advice. None of us signed up to look over her shoulder, so if you want to get a response from somebody like myself, then my talkpage or my email would be the best place. I'm only here today to see if Mattisse has returned. I don't usually come here, and I dare say that is the case for most of the others. And if you do want to know more from me than what is given in the plan and was discussed during the case I would be interested in an explanation of your interest and your intentions because at the moment I am a little puzzled.  <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 16:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
271105 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271103 +++$+++ 271104 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.252978320E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I've read the ArbCom case several times, but will re-read it at your suggestion. If I have a question for you, I will contact you on your talk page. At this point, I'm still struggling for an answer to my first question, so I haven't gotten that far.<p>Mentorship was proposed as an approach to address a pattern of problematic interactions. Following the most recent incident, it seemed to me that a) some of Mattisse's erstwhile mentors no longer wished to continue in that role, and b) members of the community in some cases had a very different conception of the mentorship process than did the mentors themselves.<p>In that context, it's no longer clear, to me at least, who Mattisse's remaining mentors are. It therefore seems reasonable to ask Mattisse directly. That would be a starting point to address the question of what can be done to prevent further distressing episodes, which is my interest here (to answer your query). The resistance to this first simple, direct question concerns me. ''' +++$+++ ::Thank you. I've read the ArbCom case several times, but will re-read it at your suggestion. If I have a question for you, I will contact you on your talk page. At this point, I'm still struggling for an answer to my first question, so I haven't gotten that far.<p>Mentorship was proposed as an approach to address a pattern of problematic interactions. Following the most recent incident, it seemed to me that a) some of Mattisse's erstwhile mentors no longer wished to continue in that role, and b) members of the community in some cases had a very different conception of the mentorship process than did the mentors themselves.<p>In that context, it's no longer clear, to me at least, who Mattisse's remaining mentors are. It therefore seems reasonable to ask Mattisse directly. That would be a starting point to address the question of what can be done to prevent further distressing episodes, which is my interest here (to answer your query). The resistance to this first simple, direct question concerns me. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 18:32, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
271106 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271103 +++$+++ 271105 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.252979400E09 +++$+++ As far as I know, all the mentors\/advisers who were originally designated per arbcom[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision#Users_willing_to_act_as_advisers], and whose advice I trusted, are still willing to be mentors\/advisers, with the possible exception of [[User:Ling.Nut]] who retired.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Ling.Nut&oldid=311592779] Please remember also that my RFC was closed due to inactivity. (See [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/User conduct\/Archive]] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/User_conduct\/Archive&diff=270840989&oldid=263183353]. Arbcom  meant to put the past to rest and focus on my behavior going forward.  You may want to bring up more recent issues with my adviser\/mentors. In the case of FAR, [[User:YellowMonkey|YellowMonkey]] would be the person to address. In the case of DYK, it would be [[User:Art LaPella|Art LaPella]]. Both agreed in arbcom to take on that role. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :::As far as I know, all the mentors/advisers who were originally designated per arbcom[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision#Users_willing_to_act_as_advisers], and whose advice I trusted, are still willing to be mentors/advisers, with the possible exception of [[User:Ling.Nut]] who retired.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ling.Nut&oldid=311592779] Please remember also that my RFC was closed due to inactivity. (See [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct/Archive&diff=270840989&oldid=263183353]. Arbcom  meant to put the past to rest and focus on my behavior going forward.  You may want to bring up more recent issues with my adviser/mentors. In the case of FAR, [[User:YellowMonkey|YellowMonkey]] would be the person to address. In the case of DYK, it would be [[User:Art LaPella|Art LaPella]]. Both agreed in arbcom to take on that role. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
271107 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271103 +++$+++ 271106 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.252987920E09 +++$+++ Thank you, that's very helpful. YellowMonkey at FAR, and Art LaPella at DYK. As I'm not able to know whose advice you currently trust, could you indicate which of the [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Proposed_decision#Users_willing_to_act_as_advisers|listed editors]] (Philcha, Fowler&fowler, Geometry Guy, RegentsPark, SilkTork, and John Carter) you still consider mentors? (I've left off Malleus and Moni3 for obvious reasons). And if I've missed anyone, please let me know. Thanks again. ''' +++$+++ ::::Thank you, that's very helpful. YellowMonkey at FAR, and Art LaPella at DYK. As I'm not able to know whose advice you currently trust, could you indicate which of the [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Proposed_decision#Users_willing_to_act_as_advisers|listed editors]] (Philcha, Fowler&fowler, Geometry Guy, RegentsPark, SilkTork, and John Carter) you still consider mentors? (I've left off Malleus and Moni3 for obvious reasons). And if I've missed anyone, please let me know. Thanks again. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 21:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
271108 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271103 +++$+++ 271107 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.252989000E09 +++$+++ Yes, YellowMonkey, Art LaPella, Philcha, Fowler&Fowlder, Geometry guy, RegentsPark, SilkTork, John Carter and Salix alba. Ling.Nut if he is around. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Yes, YellowMonkey, Art LaPella, Philcha, Fowler&Fowlder, Geometry guy, RegentsPark, SilkTork, John Carter and Salix alba. Ling.Nut if he is around. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
271109 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271103 +++$+++ 271108 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.252989480E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks. I'll address the remaining questions to them. ''' +++$+++ ::::::OK, thanks. I'll address the remaining questions to them. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 21:38, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

8962 +++$+++ Krellis +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-05 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.173158520E09 +++$+++ A [[WP:RFM|request for mediation]] has been filed with the [[WP:MC|Mediation Committee]] that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation\/World War II]], and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to [[Wikipedia:Mediation]]. '''There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.''' \u2014 +++$+++ A [[WP:RFM|request for mediation]] has been filed with the [[WP:MC|Mediation Committee]] that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/World War II]], and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to [[Wikipedia:Mediation]]. '''There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.''' —[[User:Krellis|Krellis]] <small>([[User talk:Krellis|Talk]])</small> 21:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
8963 +++$+++ Krellis +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8962 +++$+++ 8962 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.173171600E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you added [[Pacific War]] to the mediation case - from a quick look over there I couldn't immediately see a directly related dispute, so I'm not sure that it's entirely appropriate to merge them together.  Certainly, the participants do look similar, and the discussion is on a similar topic, but I'm not sure they're similar enough to try to handle in the same case.  I'd appreciate if you could maybe explain your reasoning a little more to help me understand why you made the addition.  Thanks! \u2014 +++$+++ :I noticed that you added [[Pacific War]] to the mediation case - from a quick look over there I couldn't immediately see a directly related dispute, so I'm not sure that it's entirely appropriate to merge them together.  Certainly, the participants do look similar, and the discussion is on a similar topic, but I'm not sure they're similar enough to try to handle in the same case.  I'd appreciate if you could maybe explain your reasoning a little more to help me understand why you made the addition.  Thanks! —[[User:Krellis|Krellis]] <small>([[User talk:Krellis|Talk]])</small> 01:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

482091 +++$+++ Bubba hotep +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-22 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.164263100E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm having problems with [[:Only2|this article]] and was wondering if you could have a look, especially at the talk page. It appears the author (alternating between user and anon IP, claiming to have no affiliation to the company) it using devisive tactics to make sure the article stays. I see you are an admin on duty, which is why I am asking. Thanks very much, if you have the time, that is.  +++$+++ Hi, I'm having problems with [[:Only2|this article]] and was wondering if you could have a look, especially at the talk page. It appears the author (alternating between user and anon IP, claiming to have no affiliation to the company) it using devisive tactics to make sure the article stays. I see you are an admin on duty, which is why I am asking. Thanks very much, if you have the time, that is. [[User:Bubba hotep|Bubba]] [[User talk:Bubba hotep|hot]][[Special:Contributions/Bubba hotep|ep]] 22:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
482092 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482091 +++$+++ 482091 +++$+++ 2006-11-22 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.164263880E09 +++$+++ Looks like someone beat me to it.  I was about to delete it per [[WP:CSD#G11]].  \u2014 +++$+++ :Looks like someone beat me to it.  I was about to delete it per [[WP:CSD#G11]].  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 22:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

576415 +++$+++ Ultramarine +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576415 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-16 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.205688000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ultramarine|Ultramarine]] ([[User talk:Ultramarine|talk]]) 10:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
576416 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576415 +++$+++ 576415 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.205700360E09 +++$+++ First 4 are all San Francisco..last one is not familiar. A hunch would indicate [[User:Fairness And Accuracy For All]] aka [[User:Bmedley Sutler]].-- +++$+++ :First 4 are all San Francisco..last one is not familiar. A hunch would indicate [[User:Fairness And Accuracy For All]] aka [[User:Bmedley Sutler]].--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 13:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
576417 +++$+++ Ultramarine +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576415 +++$+++ 576416 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.205724120E09 +++$+++ Thanks. The title move has the probably unintended advantage of widening the scope to include terrorism against the US. Will try to improve the article. +++$+++ ::Thanks. The title move has the probably unintended advantage of widening the scope to include terrorism against the US. Will try to improve the article.[[User:Ultramarine|Ultramarine]] ([[User talk:Ultramarine|talk]]) 20:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
576418 +++$+++ Bigtimepeace +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576415 +++$+++ 576417 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.205725920E09 +++$+++ I must say, I've enjoyed not having that article pop up on my watchlist!-- +++$+++ :::I must say, I've enjoyed not having that article pop up on my watchlist!--[[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] |  [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 20:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
576419 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576415 +++$+++ 576418 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.205852100E09 +++$+++ Me too...when I see a situation that is almost beyond repair, I tend to walk away if possible. My only exception has been some of the 9\/11 related articles.-- +++$+++ ::::Me too...when I see a situation that is almost beyond repair, I tend to walk away if possible. My only exception has been some of the 9/11 related articles.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 07:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

533253 +++$+++ Beamathan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-10 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.213129860E09 +++$+++ I SAID...HOW ARE YOU?! ;)  +++$+++ I SAID...HOW ARE YOU?! ;) [[User:Beamathan|Beam]] 13:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
533254 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533253 +++$+++ 533253 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.213130160E09 +++$+++ Sorry, must have missed your last post... :-) I am doing fine, busy as always but still manage to check what's going on every now and then. And you, how's it going? --''' +++$+++ : Sorry, must have missed your last post... :-) I am doing fine, busy as always but still manage to check what's going on every now and then. And you, how's it going? --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

271110 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271110 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-14 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.252988160E09 +++$+++ I do have a question for Mattisse: What do you think could have been done to stop the previous problem flaring up? -- +++$+++ I do have a question for Mattisse: What do you think could have been done to stop the previous problem flaring up? --[[User:Salix alba|Salix]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]): 21:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
271111 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271110 +++$+++ 271110 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.252989480E09 +++$+++ I used poor judgment and thought that I would make a point. I see so much joking going on it is hard for me to distinguish sometimes. I think a great deal would be gained by my dewatchlisting a variety of pages that seem to lead me astray and to think incorrectly. I get caught up in the wikidrama and general shenanigans and jokiness  and forget that I am not really one of them. By the way, I am number 127 on the [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits\/latest]], so a very small number of my edits are problematic, and not any of them regarding article edits. I allow myself to be provoked and let other editors get under my skin. I am so glad to hear from you!  Regards,  &mdash; +++$+++ :I used poor judgment and thought that I would make a point. I see so much joking going on it is hard for me to distinguish sometimes. I think a great deal would be gained by my dewatchlisting a variety of pages that seem to lead me astray and to think incorrectly. I get caught up in the wikidrama and general shenanigans and jokiness  and forget that I am not really one of them. By the way, I am number 127 on the [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits/latest]], so a very small number of my edits are problematic, and not any of them regarding article edits. I allow myself to be provoked and let other editors get under my skin. I am so glad to hear from you!  Regards,  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:38, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
271112 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271110 +++$+++ 271111 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.253051880E09 +++$+++ I truly don't understand how one can be \"provoked\" into creating sockpuppets.  Mattisse, you really need to begin taking responsibility for your own choices. 14:06, 15 September 2009 (UTC)   +++$+++ ::I truly don't understand how one can be "provoked" into creating sockpuppets.  Mattisse, you really need to begin taking responsibility for your own choices. 14:06, 15 September 2009 (UTC)  [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 14:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
271113 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271110 +++$+++ 271112 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.253076600E09 +++$+++ My view that mentoring is not policing has a flip-side, however: it isn't protection either. The post which started this thread has the wrong emphasis, and MastCell's response was understandable. In my spirit \"warning off\" other editors is not part of the mentoring role. For me the mentoring role is to help Mattisse protect herself, mostly from herself, but also to help her respond better to the challenges she faces. While I am not as filled with horror as Malleus is by the opening post, I firmly disagree with its tenor. Mattisse is, self-evidently, responsible for her own actions, and if she decides to continue to contribute here, she needs to appreciate that fact. '' +++$+++ ::: My view that mentoring is not policing has a flip-side, however: it isn't protection either. The post which started this thread has the wrong emphasis, and MastCell's response was understandable. In my spirit "warning off" other editors is not part of the mentoring role. For me the mentoring role is to help Mattisse protect herself, mostly from herself, but also to help her respond better to the challenges she faces. While I am not as filled with horror as Malleus is by the opening post, I firmly disagree with its tenor. Mattisse is, self-evidently, responsible for her own actions, and if she decides to continue to contribute here, she needs to appreciate that fact. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 21:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
271114 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271110 +++$+++ 271113 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.253078040E09 +++$+++ Further to this, I hope that Mattisse's removal of the retirement notice a few minutes after my post reflects that she understands her responsibilities to the community and the encyclopedia. '' +++$+++ ::::Further to this, I hope that Mattisse's removal of the retirement notice a few minutes after my post reflects that she understands her responsibilities to the community and the encyclopedia. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 22:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

533255 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533255 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-13 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.213369800E09 +++$+++ I am really sorry for blocking you. I meant to block someone else, but I wasn't paying close enough attention to what I was doing. I wish I could blame the weed, but this one's all on me. Believe it or not, I usually don't do anything amazingly stupid like that. I beg your forgiveness, take care. -- +++$+++ I am really sorry for blocking you. I meant to block someone else, but I wasn't paying close enough attention to what I was doing. I wish I could blame the weed, but this one's all on me. Believe it or not, I usually don't do anything amazingly stupid like that. I beg your forgiveness, take care. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] ([[User talk:Bongwarrior|talk]]) 08:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
533256 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533255 +++$+++ 533255 +++$+++ 2008-06-13 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.213372320E09 +++$+++ No problem, mistakes happen. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : No problem, mistakes happen. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

550228 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-04 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.160018940E09 +++$+++ P. S. Please see [[Croatia#History]]. It's too POV to present it in the '''main''' article on the Republic of Croatia; perhaps it should be mentioned at [[Croatian War of Independence]].. or [[History of Croatia]]. Cheers, mate! -- +++$+++ P. S. Please see [[Croatia#History]]. It's too POV to present it in the '''main''' article on the Republic of Croatia; perhaps it should be mentioned at [[Croatian War of Independence]].. or [[History of Croatia]]. Cheers, mate! --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 20:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
550229 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550228 +++$+++ 550228 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.160019240E09 +++$+++ Don't know, I never edited the Croatia article. If you consider it to be to POV, well, rewrite it :-) -- +++$+++ : Don't know, I never edited the Croatia article. If you consider it to be to POV, well, rewrite it :-) --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 20:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

533257 +++$+++ L'Aquatique +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533257 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-18 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.213792080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your time!  +++$+++ Thanks for your time! [[User:L'Aquatique|<font face="Georgia"><font color="#000000">'''L'Aquatique'''</font></font>]][[User talk:L'Aquatique|<font color="#838B8B">[<font face="Monotype Corsiva">talk</font>]</font>]] 05:28, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
533258 +++$+++ L'Aquatique +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533257 +++$+++ 533257 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.213792140E09 +++$+++ Whoops, just happened to read like three posts up and see that you are busy! Sorry to bother you. If you have more time in the future, I'd love it if you'd get in touch...  +++$+++ :Whoops, just happened to read like three posts up and see that you are busy! Sorry to bother you. If you have more time in the future, I'd love it if you'd get in touch... [[User:L'Aquatique|<font face="Georgia"><font color="#000000">'''L'Aquatique'''</font></font>]][[User talk:L'Aquatique|<font color="#838B8B">[<font face="Monotype Corsiva">talk</font>]</font>]] 05:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
533259 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533257 +++$+++ 533258 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.213798980E09 +++$+++ Sure. You are always welcome to ask if there are any kind of questions. But I really don't have time for a full-time coaching these months... Greetings. --''' +++$+++ :: Sure. You are always welcome to ask if there are any kind of questions. But I really don't have time for a full-time coaching these months... Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
533260 +++$+++ L'Aquatique +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533257 +++$+++ 533259 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.213849500E09 +++$+++ Well, I do have one question. If I were to come across a page that I would normally mark as a CSD- like copyright infringement, etc, as an admin can I just delete it or do I need to mark it CSD and ask another opinion?  +++$+++ :::Well, I do have one question. If I were to come across a page that I would normally mark as a CSD- like copyright infringement, etc, as an admin can I just delete it or do I need to mark it CSD and ask another opinion? [[User:L'Aquatique|<font face="Georgia"><font color="#000000">'''L'Aquatique'''</font></font>]][[User talk:L'Aquatique|<font color="#838B8B">[<font face="Monotype Corsiva">talk</font>]</font>]] 21:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
533261 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533257 +++$+++ 533260 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.213851360E09 +++$+++ If the article meets the CSD criteria, then it should be deleted. To determine, whether it meets them, is a personal decision. If it is an obvious CSD, delete it straight ahead. If not sure, it's better to use prod or afd. The fact that another editor has already tagged an article csd can serve you as an aditional opinion. But even if you delete the article, if the author is commited to write something good, he\/she will contact you on the talkpage - this happens to me often when I clean the prod cat. It is almost always possible to restore deleted content. (looking at what I've just written, it may look confusing. The message is: if sure, delete. If not, tag and wait for another opinion.) I hope this helps. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ :::: If the article meets the CSD criteria, then it should be deleted. To determine, whether it meets them, is a personal decision. If it is an obvious CSD, delete it straight ahead. If not sure, it's better to use prod or afd. The fact that another editor has already tagged an article csd can serve you as an aditional opinion. But even if you delete the article, if the author is commited to write something good, he/she will contact you on the talkpage - this happens to me often when I clean the prod cat. It is almost always possible to restore deleted content. (looking at what I've just written, it may look confusing. The message is: if sure, delete. If not, tag and wait for another opinion.) I hope this helps. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
533262 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533257 +++$+++ 533261 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.213851420E09 +++$+++ Oh, and if you delete a tagged article, the edit summary with the reason will be provided automatically. If there is no tag, make sure you write the reason. --''' +++$+++ ::::: Oh, and if you delete a tagged article, the edit summary with the reason will be provided automatically. If there is no tag, make sure you write the reason. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
533263 +++$+++ L'Aquatique +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533257 +++$+++ 533262 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.213856940E09 +++$+++ That answers my question perfectly, thank you! [[User:L'Aquatique|<font face=\"Georgia\"><font color=\"#000000\">'''L'Aquatique'''<\/font><\/font>]]<font color=\"#838B8B\">[<font face=\"Monotype Corsiva\"><sup>[[User talk:L'Aquatique|talk]]<\/sup>\/<sub> +++$+++ ::::::That answers my question perfectly, thank you! [[User:L'Aquatique|<font face="Georgia"><font color="#000000">'''L'Aquatique'''</font></font>]]<font color="#838B8B">[<font face="Monotype Corsiva"><sup>[[User talk:L'Aquatique|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[User:L'Aquatique/thoughts|think]]</sub></font>]</font> 23:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
533264 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533257 +++$+++ 533257 +++$+++ 2008-06-19 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.213939860E09 +++$+++ Ok, now I am confused. What's with this templates and why are they there with the deleted articles? If I remember correctly, there is a bot that takes care of the talkpages of the deleted articles so these should be gone shortly. Or were there some changes? In that case, please, bring me up to date, I was not following a lot recently. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, now I am confused. What's with this templates and why are they there with the deleted articles? If I remember correctly, there is a bot that takes care of the talkpages of the deleted articles so these should be gone shortly. Or were there some changes? In that case, please, bring me up to date, I was not following a lot recently. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
533265 +++$+++ 151.200.237.53 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533257 +++$+++ 533264 +++$+++ 2008-06-19 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.213942320E09 +++$+++ Those '''Oldprodfull''' tags were added during the PROD or 2nd of the PROD as an aid for the closing admin, and to prevent an attempt to PROD again after it had been contested ... it's a Very New template (less than six months old) and since all trace of it evaporates when an article is deleted, [[:Special:WhatLinksHere\/Template:Oldprodfull|who's going to notice it?]] ... I sometimes patrol [[:Category:Proposed deletion-endorsed]] and add it to Discussion pages (it's an [[Obsessive-compulsive disorder|OCD]] thing. :-) &mdash; [[Special:Contributions\/151.200.237.53|151.200.237.53]] ( +++$+++ ::Those '''Oldprodfull''' tags were added during the PROD or 2nd of the PROD as an aid for the closing admin, and to prevent an attempt to PROD again after it had been contested ... it's a Very New template (less than six months old) and since all trace of it evaporates when an article is deleted, [[:Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Oldprodfull|who's going to notice it?]] ... I sometimes patrol [[:Category:Proposed deletion-endorsed]] and add it to Discussion pages (it's an [[Obsessive-compulsive disorder|OCD]] thing. :-) &mdash; [[Special:Contributions/151.200.237.53|151.200.237.53]] ([[User talk:151.200.237.53|talk]]) 23:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
533266 +++$+++ 151.200.237.53 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533257 +++$+++ 533265 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.213957140E09 +++$+++ {{Done}} - They're history! &mdash; [[Special:Contributions\/151.200.237.53|151.200.237.53]] ( +++$+++ :::{{Done}} - They're history! &mdash; [[Special:Contributions/151.200.237.53|151.200.237.53]] ([[User talk:151.200.237.53|talk]]) 03:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

8971 +++$+++ Kyriakos +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-09 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.202618340E09 +++$+++ The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Coordinators\/February 2008|'''sign up here''']] by February 14!  +++$+++ The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/February 2008|'''sign up here''']] by February 14! [[User:Kyriakos|Kyriakos]] ([[User talk:Kyriakos|talk]]) 20:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
8972 +++$+++ Roger Davies +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8971 +++$+++ 8971 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.203398580E09 +++$+++ The February 2008 [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] election has begun.  We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates.  Please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Coordinators\/February 2008|vote here]] by February 28. -- +++$+++ :The February 2008 [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] election has begun.  We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates.  Please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/February 2008|vote here]] by February 28. --[[User:Roger Davies|<font color="maroon">'''R<small>OGER</small>&nbsp;D<small>AVIES'''</small></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 21:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

8977 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-02 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.220357040E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] ([[User talk:Petercorless|talk]]) 05:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
8978 +++$+++ Colonel Warden +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8977 +++$+++ 8977 +++$+++ 2008-09-02 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.220367960E09 +++$+++ I agree with your sentiments but a deletion review will not be productive.  I suggest that you recreate the article under an English title which makes the topic clearer and buttress it with a solid source from the outset.  +++$+++ * I agree with your sentiments but a deletion review will not be productive.  I suggest that you recreate the article under an English title which makes the topic clearer and buttress it with a solid source from the outset. [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 08:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
8979 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8977 +++$+++ 8978 +++$+++ 2008-09-02 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.220403420E09 +++$+++ It is productive if people let, allow, and permit it to be so. Which I posit will be the case upon logical reflection. It is sociologically maladaptive to be so driven to squelch this article. Colonel, your idea is a good one. In fact, in the sense of \"and\"-based thinking, we can create both Latin and English, and link both to the same destination. We have articles about [[Hello Kitty]]. I have no idea why *that* expression of modern popular culture merits inclusion while the historical popular culture of the Roman civilization, expressed by \"Carpent tua poma nepotes\" would be driven from the memetic space of Wikipedia. -- +++$+++ ** It is productive if people let, allow, and permit it to be so. Which I posit will be the case upon logical reflection. It is sociologically maladaptive to be so driven to squelch this article. Colonel, your idea is a good one. In fact, in the sense of "and"-based thinking, we can create both Latin and English, and link both to the same destination. We have articles about [[Hello Kitty]]. I have no idea why *that* expression of modern popular culture merits inclusion while the historical popular culture of the Roman civilization, expressed by "Carpent tua poma nepotes" would be driven from the memetic space of Wikipedia. --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] ([[User talk:Petercorless#top|talk]]) 17:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

533267 +++$+++ AuthorAuthor +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-20 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.213972080E09 +++$+++ Hi, Tone. I'm not the originator of the article [[Geoff Schumacher]], but I would like an opportunity to restore it, if possible. He is an author, journalist and, most notably, considered a historian in the Las Vegas area. I'd like to work on it and resubmit it in a form that meets your content requirements. Is that possible? Thanks very much.  +++$+++ Hi, Tone. I'm not the originator of the article [[Geoff Schumacher]], but I would like an opportunity to restore it, if possible. He is an author, journalist and, most notably, considered a historian in the Las Vegas area. I'd like to work on it and resubmit it in a form that meets your content requirements. Is that possible? Thanks very much. [[User:AuthorAuthor|AuthorAuthor]] ([[User talk:AuthorAuthor|talk]]) 07:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
533268 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533267 +++$+++ 533267 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 07:37:00 +++$+++ 1.213972620E09 +++$+++ Sure, you are welcome to improve it. The thing you have to address is the reason for deletion, namely \"No non-trivial coverage of subject by reliable, third-party published sources.\". Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Sure, you are welcome to improve it. The thing you have to address is the reason for deletion, namely "No non-trivial coverage of subject by reliable, third-party published sources.". Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

271126 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-14 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.252972080E09 +++$+++ Good to see you editing again. I am insanely busy in real life at the moment, but please get in touch with me if you are feeling any stress regarding returning to Wikipedia. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ Good to see you editing again. I am insanely busy in real life at the moment, but please get in touch with me if you are feeling any stress regarding returning to Wikipedia. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 16:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
271127 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271126 +++$+++ 271126 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.252986060E09 +++$+++ Also glad to see you editing again, you certainly seem to me well able to make valuable contributions. As always, I plead ignorance and idleness for not following the goings on, but will be glad to help with anything that doesn't disrupt my wikisloth. All the best,  +++$+++ :Also glad to see you editing again, you certainly seem to me well able to make valuable contributions. As always, I plead ignorance and idleness for not following the goings on, but will be glad to help with anything that doesn't disrupt my wikisloth. All the best, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
271128 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271126 +++$+++ 271127 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.252998900E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your kind words. I am deeply appreciative. &mdash; +++$+++ ::Thank you for your kind words. I am deeply appreciative. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

8985 +++$+++ 98.119.158.59 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8985 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-12 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.250060460E09 +++$+++ I read the article and see the event started in 1992. Maybe you should rename the article as [[Attempts at reconciliation in Somalia (1992\u20132004)]]. [[Special:Contributions\/98.119.158.59|98.119.158.59]] ( +++$+++ I read the article and see the event started in 1992. Maybe you should rename the article as [[Attempts at reconciliation in Somalia (1992–2004)]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.119.158.59|98.119.158.59]] ([[User talk:98.119.158.59|talk]]) 00:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
8986 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8985 +++$+++ 8985 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.250077140E09 +++$+++ How about I just add information for the 1991 events? :) -- +++$+++ :How about I just add information for the 1991 events? :) --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] ([[User talk:Petercorless#top|talk]]) 04:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
8987 +++$+++ 98.119.158.59 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8985 +++$+++ 8986 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.250084820E09 +++$+++ Cool. By the way, the war started in 1991. I think in the [[Template:Campaignbox Somali Civil War]], the link to [[Somalian Revolution (1986\u20131992)]] should be removed because it was just the background, same as the case in [[Template:Campaignbox Afghan Civil War]], see the talk page. [[Special:Contributions\/98.119.158.59|98.119.158.59]] ( +++$+++ ::Cool. By the way, the war started in 1991. I think in the [[Template:Campaignbox Somali Civil War]], the link to [[Somalian Revolution (1986–1992)]] should be removed because it was just the background, same as the case in [[Template:Campaignbox Afghan Civil War]], see the talk page. [[Special:Contributions/98.119.158.59|98.119.158.59]] ([[User talk:98.119.158.59|talk]]) 06:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
8988 +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ Petercorless +++$+++ 8985 +++$+++ 8987 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.250147940E09 +++$+++ It depends on how one looks at the Somali Civil War. It either \"started\" in 1991 with the fall of the Siad Barre government, or it was the logical continuation of the revolution which began against Siad Barre in 1986. The 1986-1992 period is useful to review as an arc from the beginning of the revolution, through the ouster of the Barre regime, through the period of post-revolution chaos and the advent of the U.N. missions in 1992. This is how Wikipedia has the main [[Somali Civil War]] page organized (q.v.). -- +++$+++ :::It depends on how one looks at the Somali Civil War. It either "started" in 1991 with the fall of the Siad Barre government, or it was the logical continuation of the revolution which began against Siad Barre in 1986. The 1986-1992 period is useful to review as an arc from the beginning of the revolution, through the ouster of the Barre regime, through the period of post-revolution chaos and the advent of the U.N. missions in 1992. This is how Wikipedia has the main [[Somali Civil War]] page organized (q.v.). --[[User:Petercorless|Petercorless]] ([[User talk:Petercorless#top|talk]]) 00:19, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

533275 +++$+++ Patrick.c.knight +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-25 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.217026740E09 +++$+++ Is the VKernel page nominated for deletion for notability? I didn't create the original page that was deleted.  I thought I might try to create a new page for VKernel.-- +++$+++ Is the VKernel page nominated for deletion for notability? I didn't create the original page that was deleted.  I thought I might try to create a new page for VKernel.--[[User:Patrick.c.knight|patrick.c.knight]] ([[User talk:Patrick.c.knight|talk]]) 15:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
533276 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533275 +++$+++ 533275 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 06:48:00 +++$+++ 1.217512080E09 +++$+++ Actually, I nominated it procedurally because it got deleted before. Anyway, it looks it will be fine this time since the article is better. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Actually, I nominated it procedurally because it got deleted before. Anyway, it looks it will be fine this time since the article is better. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 06:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

533277 +++$+++ Spencer +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533277 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-30 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.217407200E09 +++$+++ I created the category [[:Category:Wikipedia in the news frequent administrators]]. As you have experience in ITN and ITN-related matters, I invite you to add your name there. The purpose is so if a non-admin (such as myself) needs an administrator to  add, modify, or remove an item, you have experience in this area. Thanks, ''' +++$+++ I created the category [[:Category:Wikipedia in the news frequent administrators]]. As you have experience in ITN and ITN-related matters, I invite you to add your name there. The purpose is so if a non-admin (such as myself) needs an administrator to  add, modify, or remove an item, you have experience in this area. Thanks, '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#006400">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:Coral">T♦</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:Coral">C</span>]]</sup> 01:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
533278 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533277 +++$+++ 533277 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 06:48:00 +++$+++ 1.217512080E09 +++$+++ Hm... it is empty at the moment. Might work in some time though. I think the easiest way is to see which of the admins is active at the moment and he\/she will take care of the posts. The category does not help much if you want a fast response... --''' +++$+++ : Hm... it is empty at the moment. Might work in some time though. I think the easiest way is to see which of the admins is active at the moment and he/she will take care of the posts. The category does not help much if you want a fast response... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 06:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

176261 +++$+++ Earthdirt +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176261 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-07 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.236426000E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Let it be known that <big>[[User:BillC|BillC]]<\/big> was awarded Fifth Place in the first [[Wikipedia:The_Core_Contest\/Winners|Wikipedia Core Contest]]. This award is based on his outstanding work in improving '''[[Electricity]]'''. Thanks for your hard work in making Wikipedia's core articles better.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Let it be known that <big>[[User:BillC|BillC]]</big> was awarded Fifth Place in the first [[Wikipedia:The_Core_Contest/Winners|Wikipedia Core Contest]]. This award is based on his outstanding work in improving '''[[Electricity]]'''. Thanks for your hard work in making Wikipedia's core articles better. [[User:Earthdirt|Earthdirt]] ([[User talk:Earthdirt|talk]]) 03:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
176262 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176261 +++$+++ 176261 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.236448140E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot, much appreciated! And a fun image too! &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks a lot, much appreciated! And a fun image too! &mdash;[[User:BillC|<span style="background:#803020;color:white;font-variant:small-caps">'''BillC'''</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 09:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
176263 +++$+++ Earthdirt +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176261 +++$+++ 176262 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.236506460E09 +++$+++ Glad you liked it, I thought it was a funny and oddly appropriate image for the contest. Peace  +++$+++ ::Glad you liked it, I thought it was a funny and oddly appropriate image for the contest. Peace [[User:Earthdirt|Earthdirt]] ([[User talk:Earthdirt|talk]]) 02:01, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
176264 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176261 +++$+++ 176261 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.237344000E09 +++$+++ Certainly, you are free to e-mail me and I would be interested to read what you have to send. My e-mail address for this purpose is billc_wiki and the domain is @yahoo.co.uk. &mdash; +++$+++ :Certainly, you are free to e-mail me and I would be interested to read what you have to send. My e-mail address for this purpose is billc_wiki and the domain is @yahoo.co.uk. &mdash;[[User:BillC|<span style="background:#803020;color:white;font-variant:small-caps">'''BillC'''</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 19:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
176265 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176261 +++$+++ 176261 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.237446780E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your e-mail. I have had a brief read-though of the paper and will give it a more thorough reading tonight. &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you for your e-mail. I have had a brief read-though of the paper and will give it a more thorough reading tonight. &mdash;[[User:BillC|<span style="background:#803020;color:white;font-variant:small-caps">'''BillC'''</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 00:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
176266 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176261 +++$+++ 176265 +++$+++ 2009-03-26 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.238077620E09 +++$+++ Please accept my apologies for having taken so long to reply. The paper and its ensuing correspondence make interesting reading and I thank you for sending it. I am not a medical person, and so, while I take an interest in reading papers such as the one you sent, am not in a position to comment authoritatively on its contents and merits. However (and it is an important however), it is necessary to understand that Wikipedia does not take a stand on disputes such as these. Its core principle is one of [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]], hence, while it ''reports'' on disputes, it does not take a side in them. An article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source. However, one important element of NPOV is that of [[WP:WEIGHT|weight]]: the amount of coverage of a particular viewpoint should be in proportion its prominence. If we are determined to have something about epithelium removal in this treatment modality, then I think the best course of action is to say that something like the majority of practitioners in the field remove the epithelium first, but an American outfit is reporting success in a modified procedure which does not, and that this is an area of active dispute within the field. Something like that. You <u>will<\/u> need the sources that back up every word of this though. (I myself I am still of the view I held earlier -- that there is no need for the article to go into this sort of depth.) &mdash; +++$+++ ::Please accept my apologies for having taken so long to reply. The paper and its ensuing correspondence make interesting reading and I thank you for sending it. I am not a medical person, and so, while I take an interest in reading papers such as the one you sent, am not in a position to comment authoritatively on its contents and merits. However (and it is an important however), it is necessary to understand that Wikipedia does not take a stand on disputes such as these. Its core principle is one of [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]], hence, while it ''reports'' on disputes, it does not take a side in them. An article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source. However, one important element of NPOV is that of [[WP:WEIGHT|weight]]: the amount of coverage of a particular viewpoint should be in proportion its prominence. If we are determined to have something about epithelium removal in this treatment modality, then I think the best course of action is to say that something like the majority of practitioners in the field remove the epithelium first, but an American outfit is reporting success in a modified procedure which does not, and that this is an area of active dispute within the field. Something like that. You <u>will</u> need the sources that back up every word of this though. (I myself I am still of the view I held earlier -- that there is no need for the article to go into this sort of depth.) &mdash;[[User:BillC|<span style="background:#803020;color:white;font-variant:small-caps">'''BillC'''</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 07:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
176267 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176261 +++$+++ 176265 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.238962980E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I should say that the text you praise about weight and prominence are not really mine, but are a paraphrase of a section on Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View, a central pillar of its content policy. BBW's site I have not read at all, let alone too much. You have said that the overwhelming majority of practitioners are removing the epithelium first: perhaps we can set some numbers to this. For example, how many besides BBW are doing the epi-on method, and how many worldwide are doing it by the epi-off way? This would definitely affect the way something gets described&mdash;or not mentioned at all&mdash;in a Wikipedia article. (cc to [[Talk:Keratoconus]]) &mdash; +++$+++ ::Thank you. I should say that the text you praise about weight and prominence are not really mine, but are a paraphrase of a section on Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View, a central pillar of its content policy. BBW's site I have not read at all, let alone too much. You have said that the overwhelming majority of practitioners are removing the epithelium first: perhaps we can set some numbers to this. For example, how many besides BBW are doing the epi-on method, and how many worldwide are doing it by the epi-off way? This would definitely affect the way something gets described&mdash;or not mentioned at all&mdash;in a Wikipedia article. (cc to [[Talk:Keratoconus]]) &mdash;[[User:BillC|<span style="background:#803020;color:white;font-variant:small-caps">'''BillC'''</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 13:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

8993 +++$+++ gadfium +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 8993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-01 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.136183580E09 +++$+++ I note three vandalisms from your account, immediately followed by reversions. Did someone else use your computer, or were you trying to test our vandalism response?- +++$+++ I note three vandalisms from your account, immediately followed by reversions. Did someone else use your computer, or were you trying to test our vandalism response?-[[User:Gadfium|gadfium]] 22:33, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
8994 +++$+++ 81.70.91.207 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 8993 +++$+++ 8993 +++$+++ 2006-01-08 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.136764500E09 +++$+++ Neither. I just felt in the mood to vandalize. And then I felt I had been silly. Then again, Wikipedia is a silly thing anyway, so maybe I should have kept them vandalized. -  +++$+++ :Neither. I just felt in the mood to vandalize. And then I felt I had been silly. Then again, Wikipedia is a silly thing anyway, so maybe I should have kept them vandalized. - [[User:81.70.91.207|81.70.91.207]] 15:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

271138 +++$+++ Cosmic Latte +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271138 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-22 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.253609100E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. I realize that edit summaries don't allow for a whole lot of elaboration, but I have to say I'm rather baffled about your removal of the religion statement. How is the assertion, \"Depression may be less likely to occur, as well as quicker to remit, among those who are religious\", not supported by a [http:\/\/www.librapharm.com\/headeradmin\/upload\/0178web2.pdf review] article that states, \"The literature suggests that those who are religious have a lower incidence of depressive symptoms\/depression and that being religious may increase the speed of recovery from depressive disorder\"? It seems to me that the former is merely a way of paraphrasing the latter. If the former appears to be flawed for some particular reason, could you please point out this reason and suggest a better way to frame the idea? As an aside, I remember that things got a bit tense during the FAC process on this article last year. I'd like you to know, however, that I respect you as an editor, harbour no ill feelings toward you, and do not mean to imply any sort of ''personal'' conflict with you over this quote; I'm simply trying to understand your rationale, so that I might properly respond to it.  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. I realize that edit summaries don't allow for a whole lot of elaboration, but I have to say I'm rather baffled about your removal of the religion statement. How is the assertion, "Depression may be less likely to occur, as well as quicker to remit, among those who are religious", not supported by a [http://www.librapharm.com/headeradmin/upload/0178web2.pdf review] article that states, "The literature suggests that those who are religious have a lower incidence of depressive symptoms/depression and that being religious may increase the speed of recovery from depressive disorder"? It seems to me that the former is merely a way of paraphrasing the latter. If the former appears to be flawed for some particular reason, could you please point out this reason and suggest a better way to frame the idea? As an aside, I remember that things got a bit tense during the FAC process on this article last year. I'd like you to know, however, that I respect you as an editor, harbour no ill feelings toward you, and do not mean to imply any sort of ''personal'' conflict with you over this quote; I'm simply trying to understand your rationale, so that I might properly respond to it. [[User:Cosmic Latte|Cosmic Latte]] ([[User talk:Cosmic Latte|talk]]) 01:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
271139 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271138 +++$+++ 271138 +++$+++ 2009-09-22 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.253665440E09 +++$+++ The cited article is not a review article nor a meta-analysis. It is only the article writer's opinion. There is no supporting evidence that this is a widely held view, that religion is a more important factor than marrital status, health status, financial status and a number of broad indicators. Even if religion and lack of Major depressive disorder are correlated, this is not proof of a causal relationship, nor that it stands above other correlated factors. You need more than one article \"suggesting\" this to incorporate the information into the introductory paragraph of a summary article. I am not the only editor who has thought that the inclusion of this  is inappropriate. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :The cited article is not a review article nor a meta-analysis. It is only the article writer's opinion. There is no supporting evidence that this is a widely held view, that religion is a more important factor than marrital status, health status, financial status and a number of broad indicators. Even if religion and lack of Major depressive disorder are correlated, this is not proof of a causal relationship, nor that it stands above other correlated factors. You need more than one article "suggesting" this to incorporate the information into the introductory paragraph of a summary article. I am not the only editor who has thought that the inclusion of this  is inappropriate. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

8995 +++$+++ Eddideigel +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 8995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-05 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.136490180E09 +++$+++ Do you know if, and how, the robots can be programmed not to put interwikis in those pages, but automatically put them in the respective templates, or must we clean up in each case? Is there some other, robot-related forum where such things could be discussed? (<small>BTW, some users feel that interwikis should not be put in templates at all, because linking should be easy &ndash; especially for \"newbies\". But that's quite a different issue.<\/small>) I'll watch your user talk, so you may reply here. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Do you know if, and how, the robots can be programmed not to put interwikis in those pages, but automatically put them in the respective templates, or must we clean up in each case? Is there some other, robot-related forum where such things could be discussed? (<small>BTW, some users feel that interwikis should not be put in templates at all, because linking should be easy &ndash; especially for "newbies". But that's quite a different issue.</small>) I'll watch your user talk, so you may reply here. Thanks. --[[User:Eddideigel|Eddi]] <small>([[User talk:Eddideigel|Talk]])</small> 11:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
8996 +++$+++ 81.70.91.207 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 8995 +++$+++ 8995 +++$+++ 2006-01-08 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.136764620E09 +++$+++ They could be programmed that way, but I see no better way to do it than by specifying each and every such page by hand (ugly!). I'm not going to do it, I've had it with Wikipedia, and I've had it with the bot. Go to wikibots-l (just Google it or so). Farewell. -  +++$+++ :They could be programmed that way, but I see no better way to do it than by specifying each and every such page by hand (ugly!). I'm not going to do it, I've had it with Wikipedia, and I've had it with the bot. Go to wikibots-l (just Google it or so). Farewell. - [[User:81.70.91.207|81.70.91.207]] 15:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
8997 +++$+++ Eddideigel +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 8995 +++$+++ 8996 +++$+++ 2006-01-09 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.136860860E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your assistance. :) Sorry for intruding. :| -- +++$+++ ::Thank you for your assistance. :) Sorry for intruding. :| --[[User:Eddideigel|Eddi]] <small>([[User talk:Eddideigel|Talk]])</small> 18:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

271140 +++$+++ Singingdaisies +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271140 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-24 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.253840460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the cleanup work at [[Margaret Harshaw]]. That was very helpful. +++$+++ Thanks for the cleanup work at [[Margaret Harshaw]]. That was very helpful.[[User:Singingdaisies|Singingdaisies]] ([[User talk:Singingdaisies|talk]]) 18:01, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
271141 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271140 +++$+++ 271140 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.253840820E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. I meant to post on your page that I nominated it for [[Template talk:Did you know]] under September 23, and to ask you if you have any suggestions for hooks. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :You are very welcome. I meant to post on your page that I nominated it for [[Template talk:Did you know]] under September 23, and to ask you if you have any suggestions for hooks. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:07, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

8998 +++$+++ Angr +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 8998 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-15 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.137365160E09 +++$+++ Hello! You were listed on the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians\/Germany]] page as living in or being associated with Germany. As part of the [[Wikipedia:User categorisation]] project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, or one of the Bundesland-based subcategories, please visit [[:Category:Wikipedians in Germany]] for instructions. -- +++$+++ Hello! You were listed on the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Germany]] page as living in or being associated with Germany. As part of the [[Wikipedia:User categorisation]] project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, or one of the Bundesland-based subcategories, please visit [[:Category:Wikipedians in Germany]] for instructions. --[[User:Angr|Angr]] ([[User talk:Angr|<span title="Pronunciation in IPA" class="IPA">tɔk</span>]]) 14:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
8999 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 8998 +++$+++ 8998 +++$+++ 2006-01-19 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.137703500E09 +++$+++ No, I should be off... I moved out of Germany a year and a half ago. -  +++$+++ :No, I should be off... I moved out of Germany a year and a half ago. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 12:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

9000 +++$+++ Sam Vimes +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-25 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.138230180E09 +++$+++ Just because I'm curious - why did you revert the [[Canada]] article to a version that apparently is from May 2005, without even using an edit summary?  +++$+++ Just because I'm curious - why did you revert the [[Canada]] article to a version that apparently is from May 2005, without even using an edit summary? [[User:Sam Vimes|Sam Vimes]] 15:03, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
9001 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9000 +++$+++ 9000 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.138290840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the warning, I must have been asleep or something... I intended to revert a single previous edit rather than a whole bunch of them - and it seems that the edit I wanted to revert wasn't on the page in the first place. I must have hit 'save page' in the wrong window or something like that. -  +++$+++ :Thanks for the warning, I must have been asleep or something... I intended to revert a single previous edit rather than a whole bunch of them - and it seems that the edit I wanted to revert wasn't on the page in the first place. I must have hit 'save page' in the wrong window or something like that. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 07:54, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
9002 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9000 +++$+++ 9001 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.138293660E09 +++$+++ I think I already know what happened: I saw the error on a Wikipedia mirror, and used the link from there to the article, but it linked to the old version that they had copied rather than the current one. I then corrected that old version, causing me to unintendedly revert all subsequent edits. How I missed the \"You are editing an old version of the page\" warning, I still do not know. -  +++$+++ ::I think I already know what happened: I saw the error on a Wikipedia mirror, and used the link from there to the article, but it linked to the old version that they had copied rather than the current one. I then corrected that old version, causing me to unintendedly revert all subsequent edits. How I missed the "You are editing an old version of the page" warning, I still do not know. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 08:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
9003 +++$+++ Sam Vimes +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9000 +++$+++ 9002 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.138294140E09 +++$+++ Ah, makes some kind of sense. Thanks for clearing it up :)  +++$+++ :::Ah, makes some kind of sense. Thanks for clearing it up :) [[User:Sam Vimes|Sam Vimes]] 08:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

533290 +++$+++ Andrejj +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533290 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-20 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.219265460E09 +++$+++ \u010cakaj malo, prakti\u010dno skoraj vsak stavek je ozna\u010den z oznako cn!? Poleg tega je tematika tak\u0161na, da zagotovo ne more\u0161 navesti zunanjih pisnih virov, spletne strani pa so \u017ee ozna\u010dene. Ali naj torej vsak cn spremenim v referenco??  -- +++$+++ Čakaj malo, praktično skoraj vsak stavek je označen z oznako cn!? Poleg tega je tematika takšna, da zagotovo ne moreš navesti zunanjih pisnih virov, spletne strani pa so že označene. Ali naj torej vsak cn spremenim v referenco??  --[[User:Andrejj|AndrejJ]] ([[User talk:Andrejj|talk]]) 13:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
533291 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533290 +++$+++ 533290 +++$+++ 2008-08-20 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.219265820E09 +++$+++ Hm... ja. Stavki kot ''are excellent and extremely fast solving programs'' so brez navedbe vira pristranske, poleg tega je treba dodati vir iz tretje strani, ne doma\u010do stran izdelovalca. No, pri specifikacijah so tudi ti viri dovolj. Seveda lahko malo po\u010disti\u0161, recimo ena referenca na nekaj stavkov, ki so vsi pokriti itd. \u010ce komu ne bo kaj v\u0161e\u010d, se bo \u017ee oglasil. (\u010de bi bili tudi na sl: tako strogi...) :-) --''' +++$+++ : Hm... ja. Stavki kot ''are excellent and extremely fast solving programs'' so brez navedbe vira pristranske, poleg tega je treba dodati vir iz tretje strani, ne domačo stran izdelovalca. No, pri specifikacijah so tudi ti viri dovolj. Seveda lahko malo počistiš, recimo ena referenca na nekaj stavkov, ki so vsi pokriti itd. Če komu ne bo kaj všeč, se bo že oglasil. (če bi bili tudi na sl: tako strogi...) :-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

271147 +++$+++ Himalayan Explorer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-26 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.254018480E09 +++$+++ See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Nana_Palsikar|response]. The film is a 1963 film but like most films is subject to an award ceremony the following year like the Oscars. So just because it won an award in 1964 doesn't make it a 1964 film. I hope this is clear. +++$+++ See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Nana_Palsikar|response]. The film is a 1963 film but like most films is subject to an award ceremony the following year like the Oscars. So just because it won an award in 1964 doesn't make it a 1964 film. I hope this is clear.[[User talk:Himalayan Explorer| <span style="border:2px solid #C5B358 ;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:white;background:#B00760;">'''''Himalayan'''''</font>]]</span> 19:28, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
271148 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271147 +++$+++ 271147 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.254018660E09 +++$+++ The problem is that the source says the award is for 1964. I considered leaving out [[1964 in film]]. Can you fix it so the sources and the hook say the same thing?  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :The problem is that the source says the award is for 1964. I considered leaving out [[1964 in film]]. Can you fix it so the sources and the hook say the same thing?  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

9004 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-29 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.138590480E09 +++$+++ In a good faith environment, changes are made because the Wikipedians on a Wikipedia want them, not because a single Wikipedian from another Wikipedia wants them. -  +++$+++ In a good faith environment, changes are made because the Wikipedians on a Wikipedia want them, not because a single Wikipedian from another Wikipedia wants them. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 19:08, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
9005 +++$+++ Cool Cat +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9004 +++$+++ 9004 +++$+++ 2006-01-29 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.138592340E09 +++$+++ What are you trying to say? I do not like your attitude. --<small> +++$+++ :What are you trying to say? I do not like your attitude. --<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cool Cat]]<sup>[[User talk:Cool Cat|Talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Cool Cat|@]]</sup></small> 19:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

271149 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-27 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.254100800E09 +++$+++ There is no need to transclude GA Reviews after they are done, they are already prominently linked, and bolded, at the top of the page. ''' +++$+++ There is no need to transclude GA Reviews after they are done, they are already prominently linked, and bolded, at the top of the page. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 18:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
271150 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271149 +++$+++ 271149 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.254101040E09 +++$+++ Is it wrong to do it? I like to read new reviews and so I track down ones that are not viewable, as there is no link at the top of the page until the bot does the article history.  You are saying I should stop, that it is wrong? Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ :Is it wrong to do it? I like to read new reviews and so I track down ones that are not viewable, as there is no link at the top of the page until the bot does the article history.  You are saying I should stop, that it is wrong? Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

9006 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9006 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-03 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.139001360E09 +++$+++ Addition: The block threat was based on a message to me on the wikipedia-l list, see [http:\/\/mail.wikipedia.org\/pipermail\/wikipedia-l\/2006-January\/043578.html here] and [http:\/\/mail.wikipedia.org\/pipermail\/wikipedia-l\/2006-January\/043580.html here]. Anthere reacted [http:\/\/mail.wikipedia.org\/pipermail\/wikipedia-l\/2006-January\/043587.html here], apparently hearing of them for the first time and getting quite enraged. -  +++$+++ Addition: The block threat was based on a message to me on the wikipedia-l list, see [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2006-January/043578.html here] and [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2006-January/043580.html here]. Anthere reacted [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2006-January/043587.html here], apparently hearing of them for the first time and getting quite enraged. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 13:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
9007 +++$+++ Cool Cat +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9006 +++$+++ 9006 +++$+++ 2006-02-03 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.139002500E09 +++$+++ --<small> +++$+++ :--<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cool Cat]]<sup>[[User talk:Cool Cat|Talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Cool Cat|@]]</sup></small> 13:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
9008 +++$+++ Cool Cat +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9006 +++$+++ 9007 +++$+++ 2006-02-03 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.139002680E09 +++$+++ I also dont like you talking to me in 3rd person on my talk page. --<small> +++$+++ ::I also dont like you talking to me in 3rd person on my talk page. --<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cool Cat]]<sup>[[User talk:Cool Cat|Talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Cool Cat|@]]</sup></small> 13:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
9009 +++$+++ Cool Cat +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9006 +++$+++ 9007 +++$+++ 2006-02-04 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.139107320E09 +++$+++ One key thing, my actions indended to make meta more multi lingual and less of an english only cabal and hence by nature was \"anti-imperialist\" --<small> +++$+++ ::One key thing, my actions indended to make meta more multi lingual and less of an english only cabal and hence by nature was "anti-imperialist" --<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cool Cat]]<sup>[[User talk:Cool Cat|Talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Cool Cat|@]]</sup></small> 18:42, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

271152 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-22 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.256253480E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I noticed that you added a diff to some of your previous statement (thank you for your efforts to find diffs - I think that is really helping people to understand your point of view).  It might be best to create a new section for that or at least put a signature with a timestamp next to the diff; arbitrators might not notice the addition otherwise.  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I noticed that you added a diff to some of your previous statement (thank you for your efforts to find diffs - I think that is really helping people to understand your point of view).  It might be best to create a new section for that or at least put a signature with a timestamp next to the diff; arbitrators might not notice the addition otherwise. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 16:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271153 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271152 +++$+++ 271152 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.256253660E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I noticed that you misread my newest remarks regarding your statements. Please read again, and you will see you are misrepresenting them. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Thank you. I noticed that you misread my newest remarks regarding your statements. Please read again, and you will see you are misrepresenting them. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

271154 +++$+++ Hipocrite +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-23 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.256345880E09 +++$+++ I have determined that it is highly disruptive for you to mention sock-puppets in any form, joke blocks, Bishonen, Giano or George, either directly or indirectly. Consider this a final warning that mentioning any of these subjects anywhere on wikipedia without prior approval of your mentors may result in adverse consequences for your ability to edit.  +++$+++ I have determined that it is highly disruptive for you to mention sock-puppets in any form, joke blocks, Bishonen, Giano or George, either directly or indirectly. Consider this a final warning that mentioning any of these subjects anywhere on wikipedia without prior approval of your mentors may result in adverse consequences for your ability to edit. [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] ([[User talk:Hipocrite|talk]]) 17:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271155 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271154 +++$+++ 271154 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.256349540E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I would suggest not responding to Hypocrite here, or indeed anywhere. Problem also a good idea to hold your tounge on all matters relating to Giano. -- +++$+++ :Hi Mattisse, I would suggest not responding to Hypocrite here, or indeed anywhere. Problem also a good idea to hold your tounge on all matters relating to Giano. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]): 18:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

9012 +++$+++ Tempshill +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9012 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-10 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.142048520E09 +++$+++ I noticed the source web address you cited for [[:Image:Beiserebatedor.jpg]] now gets a \"page missing\" error.  Can you locate the source?  The photo of course looks like a typical agency photo and unlikely to really be freely usable, hence my looking for the source.  Thanks -  +++$+++ I noticed the source web address you cited for [[:Image:Beiserebatedor.jpg]] now gets a "page missing" error.  Can you locate the source?  The photo of course looks like a typical agency photo and unlikely to really be freely usable, hence my looking for the source.  Thanks - [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] 19:42, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
9013 +++$+++ Tempshill +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9012 +++$+++ 9012 +++$+++ 2006-03-17 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.142649360E09 +++$+++ Hi - thanks for the answer - I copied and pasted that Portuguese phrase over to the page for support.  Unfortunately an exact URL is required or eventually the photo will be deleted.   +++$+++ :Hi - thanks for the answer - I copied and pasted that Portuguese phrase over to the page for support.  Unfortunately an exact URL is required or eventually the photo will be deleted.  [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] 18:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
9014 +++$+++ Tempshill +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9012 +++$+++ 9013 +++$+++ 2006-03-17 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.142661840E09 +++$+++ The copyright status of photos you upload needs to be verifiable by other editors.  [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] is the related policy.  If you don't provide an exact source - in the case of a website, meaning an exact URL - then it may not be possible for other editors to verify the copyright status, and your image might be tagged for deletion.  I'm not going to tag it because I believe you, but others might not, and would be justified in tagging it.  On your statement about self-taken photos, at present the statement that a photo is self-taken is enough.  I can see how this is not verifiable, so my bet is that in 10 years the policy will have changed to something where they have to provide some proof that they themselves took the photo ... but I'm speculating about the future.   +++$+++ ::The copyright status of photos you upload needs to be verifiable by other editors.  [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] is the related policy.  If you don't provide an exact source - in the case of a website, meaning an exact URL - then it may not be possible for other editors to verify the copyright status, and your image might be tagged for deletion.  I'm not going to tag it because I believe you, but others might not, and would be justified in tagging it.  On your statement about self-taken photos, at present the statement that a photo is self-taken is enough.  I can see how this is not verifiable, so my bet is that in 10 years the policy will have changed to something where they have to provide some proof that they themselves took the photo ... but I'm speculating about the future.  [[User:Tempshill|Tempshill]] 22:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

394718 +++$+++ Matt91486 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-17 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310969100E09 +++$+++ \"If an article has been listed here for two weeks and is still untranslated, it should be moved to AfD.\"  So while perhaps I was wrong on the two weeks timetable, a PROD is not AfD.  I don't object to you bringing it there at all.  +++$+++ "If an article has been listed here for two weeks and is still untranslated, it should be moved to AfD."  So while perhaps I was wrong on the two weeks timetable, a PROD is not AfD.  I don't object to you bringing it there at all. [[User:Matt91486|matt91486]] ([[User talk:Matt91486|talk]]) 23:05, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
394719 +++$+++ Matt91486 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394718 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.310969400E09 +++$+++ And looking back at the article now, it appears you did and then it got translated so all is taken care of.  No harm no foul; I'll keep a closer eye on it next time.  I skimmed through it and didn't see it initially.  Quite frankly, I've never fully adjusted from the old translation request system, which always seemed to be a more logical method of doing it.  +++$+++ ::And looking back at the article now, it appears you did and then it got translated so all is taken care of.  No harm no foul; I'll keep a closer eye on it next time.  I skimmed through it and didn't see it initially.  Quite frankly, I've never fully adjusted from the old translation request system, which always seemed to be a more logical method of doing it. [[User:Matt91486|matt91486]] ([[User talk:Matt91486|talk]]) 23:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
394720 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394718 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.310971800E09 +++$+++ Prod is simply used first as a simpler method, since its a procedural deletion request rather than based on the subject of the article. And what old system, the system now has been in place for years, as far as I can tell its always been this way. Do you mean [[WP:TRANSLATION]], which is an entirely separate thing?-- +++$+++ :::Prod is simply used first as a simpler method, since its a procedural deletion request rather than based on the subject of the article. And what old system, the system now has been in place for years, as far as I can tell its always been this way. Do you mean [[WP:TRANSLATION]], which is an entirely separate thing?--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 23:50, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
394721 +++$+++ Matt91486 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394718 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.310994540E09 +++$+++ Perhaps I do mean that; as you can probably tell, my activity levels haven't been terribly high over the past while.  +++$+++ ::::Perhaps I do mean that; as you can probably tell, my activity levels haven't been terribly high over the past while. [[User:Matt91486|matt91486]] ([[User talk:Matt91486|talk]]) 06:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
394722 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394718 +++$+++ 394718 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.311020220E09 +++$+++ I had no way of knowing that and therefore could only assume the text was copied without permission. Anyway, this is the English wikipedia, articles need to be in English, you might want to try the Italian wikipedia [http:\/\/it.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pagina_principale]-- +++$+++ :I had no way of knowing that and therefore could only assume the text was copied without permission. Anyway, this is the English wikipedia, articles need to be in English, you might want to try the Italian wikipedia [http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pagina_principale]--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 13:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
394723 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394718 +++$+++ 394718 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311034860E09 +++$+++ A) learn to spell, B) did you not notice that this is the English wikipedia, for English articles, and C) I deleted it because we don't want an article about a game you and your friends made up on the playground-- +++$+++ :A) learn to spell, B) did you not notice that this is the English wikipedia, for English articles, and C) I deleted it because we don't want an article about a game you and your friends made up on the playground--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 17:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

271158 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271158 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-22 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.256263380E09 +++$+++ I request that these please be deleted if not being used for legitimate dispute resolution, and I request that your mentors discuss with you the purpose of the more recently-edited pages and whether this is an appropriate use of them.  +++$+++ I request that these please be deleted if not being used for legitimate dispute resolution, and I request that your mentors discuss with you the purpose of the more recently-edited pages and whether this is an appropriate use of them. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 19:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271159 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271158 +++$+++ 271158 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.256264280E09 +++$+++ Do you consider the last edit for [[User_talk:Mattisse\/other7b]] on 28 July 2009 within the last few weeks? What about  [[User:Giano\/Things to remember]]. Am I not allowed the same? I don't know how to keep links and other things that I want to remember? I used the links in some of those boxes just in the last few days. How do people maintain their collections of links? Some of that information I still need and some of those boxes can go. Where is the rule on what is allowed?  \u2014 +++$+++ *Do you consider the last edit for [[User_talk:Mattisse/other7b]] on 28 July 2009 within the last few weeks? What about  [[User:Giano/Things to remember]]. Am I not allowed the same? I don't know how to keep links and other things that I want to remember? I used the links in some of those boxes just in the last few days. How do people maintain their collections of links? Some of that information I still need and some of those boxes can go. Where is the rule on what is allowed?  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271160 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271158 +++$+++ 271158 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.256266440E09 +++$+++ I suggest you get rid of sub-pages that are over 1 year old, then we can look at the rest. BTW I was amused to see one of my comments linked at [[User:Giano\/Things to remember]] :-) -- +++$+++ :I suggest you get rid of sub-pages that are over 1 year old, then we can look at the rest. BTW I was amused to see one of my comments linked at [[User:Giano/Things to remember]] :-) --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 19:54, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271161 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271158 +++$+++ 271160 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.256266680E09 +++$+++ Actually, looking through them is very useful to me. Must I get rid of the old? \u2014 +++$+++ ::Actually, looking through them is very useful to me. Must I get rid of the old? —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:58, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271162 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271158 +++$+++ 271161 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.256267160E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, you can privately tell your mentors what browser you use, and have them teach you how to set up subfolders in your bookmarks or favorite places or whatever your browser calls them, and then as you delete things, you can just bookmark them off-Wiki on your browser.  This is another one of those things I've never understood why they didn't teach you, as you've expressed this frustration before.   +++$+++ ::: Mattisse, you can privately tell your mentors what browser you use, and have them teach you how to set up subfolders in your bookmarks or favorite places or whatever your browser calls them, and then as you delete things, you can just bookmark them off-Wiki on your browser.  This is another one of those things I've never understood why they didn't teach you, as you've expressed this frustration before.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:06, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271163 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271158 +++$+++ 271162 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.256267400E09 +++$+++ I have been told to make folders. John Carter says he has hundreds. However, it does not work for me. My browser only holds so many and they they fall off. I have no means of keeping track of things, diffs and such, except to hunt them down over and over again. \u2014 +++$+++ ::::I have been told to make folders. John Carter says he has hundreds. However, it does not work for me. My browser only holds so many and they they fall off. I have no means of keeping track of things, diffs and such, except to hunt them down over and over again. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:10, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271164 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.256267460E09 +++$+++ Then move them to Word documents on your hard drive.   +++$+++ :::::: Then move them to Word documents on your hard drive.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271165 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.256267580E09 +++$+++ I do not have Word documents. I only have notepad and that does not hold wiki markup.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::::::: I do not have Word documents. I only have notepad and that does not hold wiki markup.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:13, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271166 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271158 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.256268420E09 +++$+++ Then e-mail diffs to yourself.   +++$+++ :::::::: Then e-mail diffs to yourself.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

533303 +++$+++ Sillyfolkboy +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-22 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.219434660E09 +++$+++ Hi there Tone. Can you sort this out please?[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Template_talk:In_the_news#200-metres_vs_200.C2.A0metres] Cheers.  +++$+++ Hi there Tone. Can you sort this out please?[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:In_the_news#200-metres_vs_200.C2.A0metres] Cheers. [[User:Sillyfolkboy|Sillyfolkboy]] ([[User talk:Sillyfolkboy|talk]]) 12:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
533304 +++$+++ Sillyfolkboy +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533303 +++$+++ 533303 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.219435140E09 +++$+++ Cheers!  +++$+++ *Cheers! [[User:Sillyfolkboy|Sillyfolkboy]] ([[User talk:Sillyfolkboy|talk]]) 12:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

533305 +++$+++ Altar of Kez +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-22 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.219449660E09 +++$+++ I was hoping that somebody would get around to adding a page for our men's national water polo team at some point.  I think it was our only significant national team that still wasn't represented on Wikipedia.  So I just wanted to say thank you for doing that, and maybe I should apologize for my own laziness in not doing it myself when I saw it was still a red link a few weeks ago. -- +++$+++ I was hoping that somebody would get around to adding a page for our men's national water polo team at some point.  I think it was our only significant national team that still wasn't represented on Wikipedia.  So I just wanted to say thank you for doing that, and maybe I should apologize for my own laziness in not doing it myself when I saw it was still a red link a few weeks ago. --[[User:Altar of Kez|Altar of Kez]] ([[User talk:Altar of Kez|talk]]) 17:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
533306 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533305 +++$+++ 533305 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.219450980E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Well, you can still expand it a lot, I created just a stub. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : You're welcome. Well, you can still expand it a lot, I created just a stub. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:23, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

9018 +++$+++ Monotonehell +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-02 10:33:00 +++$+++ 1.146591180E09 +++$+++ Hi, just wondering what your thinking is behind removing the two articles from the Further reading section of [[Age of consent]]? I didn't add them myself, I did move them into Further reading from the main article, however. -- +++$+++ Hi, just wondering what your thinking is behind removing the two articles from the Further reading section of [[Age of consent]]? I didn't add them myself, I did move them into Further reading from the main article, however. --[[User:Monotonehell|Monotonehell]] 10:33, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
9019 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9018 +++$+++ 9018 +++$+++ 2006-05-02 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.146591480E09 +++$+++ I don't see them as being important to the subject of the page - at most they can function as source\/evidence for a statement that sometimes persecution takes place for AOC where the perpetrator and 'victim' are later married. -  +++$+++ :I don't see them as being important to the subject of the page - at most they can function as source/evidence for a statement that sometimes persecution takes place for AOC where the perpetrator and 'victim' are later married. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 10:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
9020 +++$+++ Monotonehell +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9018 +++$+++ 9019 +++$+++ 2006-05-02 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.146607080E09 +++$+++ I was in two minds about them myself. They are as you say just two examples, but since we're discussing law on that page they can be seen as precendent or enforcement of precendent. So as I said, I stood on the fence and moved them from the article to the Further reading. These are the kinds of links that have been the subject of edit wars and I wouldn't be suprised if they pop up again in the future. lol cheers for your input -- +++$+++ ::I was in two minds about them myself. They are as you say just two examples, but since we're discussing law on that page they can be seen as precendent or enforcement of precendent. So as I said, I stood on the fence and moved them from the article to the Further reading. These are the kinds of links that have been the subject of edit wars and I wouldn't be suprised if they pop up again in the future. lol cheers for your input --[[User:Monotonehell|Monotonehell]] 14:58, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

533308 +++$+++ Reywas92 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-22 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.219462140E09 +++$+++ I noticed you were creating many articles on athletes who won a medal in Beijing. If you could, please change future articles to say \"who won a medal at the Olympics\" rather than \"who has won a medal at the Olympics.\" It is not encyclopedic phrasing to use the [[perfect tense]].  Thanks, <font color=\"#1EC112\" size=\"3px\"> +++$+++ I noticed you were creating many articles on athletes who won a medal in Beijing. If you could, please change future articles to say "who won a medal at the Olympics" rather than "who has won a medal at the Olympics." It is not encyclopedic phrasing to use the [[perfect tense]].  Thanks, <font color="#1EC112" size="3px">[[User:Reywas92|Reywas92]]</font><sup><font color="#45E03A">[[User talk:Reywas92|'''Talk''']]</font></sup> 20:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
533309 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533308 +++$+++ 533308 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.219462260E09 +++$+++ I usually use past simple. Maybe sometimes perfect appeared when I was copying the etxt from somewhere else. I'll pay more attention, thanks for pointing this out. --''' +++$+++ : I usually use past simple. Maybe sometimes perfect appeared when I was copying the etxt from somewhere else. I'll pay more attention, thanks for pointing this out. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
533310 +++$+++ Reywas92 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533308 +++$+++ 533309 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.219462920E09 +++$+++ Wait a minute, these articles don't have references!  When you create a new article it ''must'' [[WP:CITE]] a source! A simple link to beijing2008.cn or nbcolympics.com is fine, but there needs to be something.  Thanks for your efforts, <font color=\"#1EC112\" size=\"3px\"> +++$+++ ::Wait a minute, these articles don't have references!  When you create a new article it ''must'' [[WP:CITE]] a source! A simple link to beijing2008.cn or nbcolympics.com is fine, but there needs to be something.  Thanks for your efforts, <font color="#1EC112" size="3px">[[User:Reywas92|Reywas92]]</font><sup><font color="#45E03A">[[User talk:Reywas92|'''Talk''']]</font></sup> 20:42, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
533311 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533308 +++$+++ 533310 +++$+++ 2008-08-23 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.219512180E09 +++$+++ I know about the references. I am planning to expand them a little later. Most of the new articles attract other editors that add the references as well. Hm, if you think a link to beijing2008.cn is enough, I'll add this now already, I was thinking about more detailed links but this is reasonable enough. --''' +++$+++ ::: I know about the references. I am planning to expand them a little later. Most of the new articles attract other editors that add the references as well. Hm, if you think a link to beijing2008.cn is enough, I'll add this now already, I was thinking about more detailed links but this is reasonable enough. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:23, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
533312 +++$+++ Reywas92 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533308 +++$+++ 533311 +++$+++ 2008-08-24 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.219636920E09 +++$+++ Well like you said, they can expand soon.  But at some point (not too far away I hope) they should link directly to the athlete's profile on the external site. Thanks!  <font color=\"#1EC112\" size=\"3px\"> +++$+++ ::::Well like you said, they can expand soon.  But at some point (not too far away I hope) they should link directly to the athlete's profile on the external site. Thanks!  <font color="#1EC112" size="3px">[[User:Reywas92|Reywas92]]</font><sup><font color="#45E03A">[[User talk:Reywas92|'''Talk''']]</font></sup> 21:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

9021 +++$+++ BD2412 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-16 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.150525560E09 +++$+++ Greetings! Your talk page is getting a bit [[Wikipedia:Article size|long in the tooth]] - please consider archiving your talk page (or ask me and I'll archive it for you). Cheers!  +++$+++ Greetings! Your talk page is getting a bit [[Wikipedia:Article size|long in the tooth]] - please consider archiving your talk page (or ask me and I'll archive it for you). Cheers! [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:gold">'''''BD2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 23:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
9022 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9021 +++$+++ 9021 +++$+++ 2006-06-16 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.150526760E09 +++$+++ DO WHATEVER YOU FUCKING LIKE. I DON'T CARE. WHY DON'T YOU ALL JUST GO HOME AND SHUT UP? FUCKERS! -  +++$+++ :DO WHATEVER YOU FUCKING LIKE. I DON'T CARE. WHY DON'T YOU ALL JUST GO HOME AND SHUT UP? FUCKERS! - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 23:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
9023 +++$+++ BD2412 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9021 +++$+++ 9022 +++$+++ 2006-06-17 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.150605000E09 +++$+++ Wonderful! I shall take care of it for you, then. Have a cheerful day!  +++$+++ ::Wonderful! I shall take care of it for you, then. Have a cheerful day! [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:gold">'''''BD2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 21:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

271167 +++$+++ Hipocrite +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-22 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.256268120E09 +++$+++ This is irritating. What browser are you using?  +++$+++ This is irritating. What browser are you using? [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] ([[User talk:Hipocrite|talk]]) 20:22, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271168 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271167 +++$+++ 271167 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.256268360E09 +++$+++ Is this really needed?  Mattisse has had a recent request for clarification, and there are indications that others feel there should be additional arbcom actions.  I see no trouble with her keeping information in the event of further disputes.  Still, Mattisse, best to keep them off wiki once you figure out a way, that way no one can peek!  I also wonder how \"public\" something is that you really, really, REALLY have to search intensively to find.-- +++$+++ :Is this really needed?  Mattisse has had a recent request for clarification, and there are indications that others feel there should be additional arbcom actions.  I see no trouble with her keeping information in the event of further disputes.  Still, Mattisse, best to keep them off wiki once you figure out a way, that way no one can peek!  I also wonder how "public" something is that you really, really, REALLY have to search intensively to find.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 20:26, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271169 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271167 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.256268540E09 +++$+++ ::<edit conflict> Firefox. I know how to make folders and bookmarks. But my browser could never hold hundreds. It only holds maybe twenty or thirty folders and those go to web page bookmarks. Wikipedia is very hard to bookmark in the way links can be keep on subpages.  \u2014 +++$+++ *::<edit conflict> Firefox. I know how to make folders and bookmarks. But my browser could never hold hundreds. It only holds maybe twenty or thirty folders and those go to web page bookmarks. Wikipedia is very hard to bookmark in the way links can be keep on subpages.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:29, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

263648 +++$+++  +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263648 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Um... hello I was wondering why the Fawlty Towers picture (with him hitting the Austin 1300) cannot be used on the userbox. Thanks - reply on my talk page it'll be easier Foxearth 00:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ Um... hello I was wondering why the Fawlty Towers picture (with him hitting the Austin 1300) cannot be used on the userbox. Thanks - reply on my talk page it'll be easier Foxearth 00:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
263649 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263648 +++$+++ 263648 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.153410660E09 +++$+++ Hello. Fair use images can only be used in article namespce. See [[User:Ed g2s\/Fair use]]. You also need a detailed [[User:The JPS\/fair use rationale|fair use rationale]] for each fair use image you use for each article it is used on.  +++$+++ :Hello. Fair use images can only be used in article namespce. See [[User:Ed g2s/Fair use]]. You also need a detailed [[User:The JPS/fair use rationale|fair use rationale]] for each fair use image you use for each article it is used on. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 08:51, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

271170 +++$+++ Hipocrite +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-22 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.256268720E09 +++$+++ Great. Go to each of the pages that you care about. Go to \"file\" then \"Save Page As\u2026\" Save the page wherever you want on your drive. Repeat this for each page. Then you have a copy you can keep forever and ever, with no one the wiser. You can gaze at them, in all of their glory, at your leisure.  +++$+++ Great. Go to each of the pages that you care about. Go to "file" then "Save Page As…" Save the page wherever you want on your drive. Repeat this for each page. Then you have a copy you can keep forever and ever, with no one the wiser. You can gaze at them, in all of their glory, at your leisure. [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] ([[User talk:Hipocrite|talk]]) 20:32, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271171 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.256270940E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]]! Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Thank you very much, [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]]! Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:09, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271172 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ 271171 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.256273280E09 +++$+++ Or, more easily, just right click in Firefox.  The menu that will come up includes \"Save page as\"-- +++$+++ ::Or, more easily, just right click in Firefox.  The menu that will come up includes "Save page as"--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 21:48, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271173 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.256276880E09 +++$+++ I think this has gone off-topic. While it's interesting to see how other manage their ammunition dumps, Mattise simply should not be holding records of things that happened more than a year ago. Almost anything that on WP over 1 year ago wasn't matter, and certainly is less important than enjoying to-day and the the day after,etc. And if any of these old issues does happen to be genuinely important, you'd remember well enough any way without on-wiki or offline records. You'll better off without 99.99% of these old grievances. -- +++$+++ :I think this has gone off-topic. While it's interesting to see how other manage their ammunition dumps, Mattise simply should not be holding records of things that happened more than a year ago. Almost anything that on WP over 1 year ago wasn't matter, and certainly is less important than enjoying to-day and the the day after,etc. And if any of these old issues does happen to be genuinely important, you'd remember well enough any way without on-wiki or offline records. You'll better off without 99.99% of these old grievances. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 22:48, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271174 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ 271173 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.256277420E09 +++$+++ Yes its well worth clearing out the old junk. Certainly pages like [[User:Mattisse\/\/Geo2]] refer to past events which are much better forgotten. -- +++$+++ ::Yes its well worth clearing out the old junk. Certainly pages like [[User:Mattisse//Geo2]] refer to past events which are much better forgotten. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]): 22:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
271175 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ 271174 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.256282640E09 +++$+++ I have requested that all but the last three (that have some relevant links in them) to be deleted. It has been an interesting read and showed me some past connection that make sense in view of todays politics on wikipedia. Very interesting.  I believe Giano, in the spirit of this endeavor, should not be allowed th mantain [[User:Giano\/Things to remember]], though it is a kick to read. I can see why wikipedia is losing editors. It is very tough going here.   \u2014 +++$+++ :::I have requested that all but the last three (that have some relevant links in them) to be deleted. It has been an interesting read and showed me some past connection that make sense in view of todays politics on wikipedia. Very interesting.  I believe Giano, in the spirit of this endeavor, should not be allowed th mantain [[User:Giano/Things to remember]], though it is a kick to read. I can see why wikipedia is losing editors. It is very tough going here.   —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:24, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271176 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ 271175 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.256283300E09 +++$+++ You have a point.  Are arbs emails available onsite (I mean, the actual emails, not just the email function)?  If they are not, Giano should not be hosting personal info regarding arbs.  He can keep people's emails in his blackberry or moral equivalent.-- +++$+++ ::::You have a point.  Are arbs emails available onsite (I mean, the actual emails, not just the email function)?  If they are not, Giano should not be hosting personal info regarding arbs.  He can keep people's emails in his blackberry or moral equivalent.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271177 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ 271176 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.256283540E09 +++$+++ In case you have not noticed, \"rules\" that apply to me do not apply to Giano. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::In case you have not noticed, "rules" that apply to me do not apply to Giano. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271178 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ 271177 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.256285340E09 +++$+++ Well, I've left a note on Giano's talk page and expect those who expressed similar concerns here to be behind me.  And no, I don't mean behind me and running in the opposite direction!-- +++$+++ ::::::Well, I've left a note on Giano's talk page and expect those who expressed similar concerns here to be behind me.  And no, I don't mean behind me and running in the opposite direction!--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271179 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ 271178 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.256285820E09 +++$+++ Thank you for that! Many would not have dared. We will see what happens, whether there are \"rules\" on wikipedia that apply to all. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::::Thank you for that! Many would not have dared. We will see what happens, whether there are "rules" on wikipedia that apply to all. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:17, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271180 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271170 +++$+++ 271179 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.256286000E09 +++$+++ I don't do Wikiprojects, I don't do cliques, I'm my own boss here on WP, and if Giano gives me a problem (and I'm sure he has this page watchlisted) I'm not going to respond, I'll just take it to MfD, and whatever they do with it is fine with me.-- +++$+++ ::::::::I don't do Wikiprojects, I don't do cliques, I'm my own boss here on WP, and if Giano gives me a problem (and I'm sure he has this page watchlisted) I'm not going to respond, I'll just take it to MfD, and whatever they do with it is fine with me.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:20, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

569483 +++$+++ MatthewUND +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-29 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.167418680E09 +++$+++ Forgive me if I have errored, but I was simply letting my fellow members of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject North Dakota|WikiProject North Dakota]] know about the RfA. --[[User:MatthewUND|Matth]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ Forgive me if I have errored, but I was simply letting my fellow members of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject North Dakota|WikiProject North Dakota]] know about the RfA. --[[User:MatthewUND|Matth]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:MatthewUND|w<font color="green"><b>UND</b></font>]]<sup>([[User talk:MatthewUND|talk]])</sup> 10:58, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
569484 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569483 +++$+++ 569483 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.167419160E09 +++$+++ Then let them find out the same way that everyone else does.  Canvassing to get your friends\/colleagues to support you is very poor practice. Both [[:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/BlackJack|BlackJack]] and [[:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Berig|Berig]] were recently warned about this.  Do you read other RfA discussions?  +++$+++ :Then let them find out the same way that everyone else does.  Canvassing to get your friends/colleagues to support you is very poor practice. Both [[:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BlackJack|BlackJack]] and [[:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Berig|Berig]] were recently warned about this.  Do you read other RfA discussions? [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 11:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
569485 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569483 +++$+++ 569483 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.167459480E09 +++$+++ Erm, I *have* disengaged!  I haven't even cast a vote in the RfA, merely pointed out factual information with reference to the guidelines for such events.  I didn't use any swearwords or [[:WP:BITE|bite]] anyone!  I haven't got a dispute with any other editor, either :-) Regards,  +++$+++ :Erm, I *have* disengaged!  I haven't even cast a vote in the RfA, merely pointed out factual information with reference to the guidelines for such events.  I didn't use any swearwords or [[:WP:BITE|bite]] anyone!  I haven't got a dispute with any other editor, either :-) Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

533318 +++$+++ Studerby +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-27 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.219877460E09 +++$+++ Sadly, there are a lot of other special rules, but the above covers 98% of all personal names your likely to see in Olympic rosters.  +++$+++ Sadly, there are a lot of other special rules, but the above covers 98% of all personal names your likely to see in Olympic rosters. [[User:Studerby|Studerby]] ([[User talk:Studerby|talk]]) 15:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
533319 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533318 +++$+++ 533318 +++$+++ 2008-08-27 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.219888740E09 +++$+++ Hi. Good, I didn't know about the Asian names trick. As you have probably seen, I've mostly been creating placeholders, adding more details, including defaultsort, birthday and so on will probably come around some time soon. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Good, I didn't know about the Asian names trick. As you have probably seen, I've mostly been creating placeholders, adding more details, including defaultsort, birthday and so on will probably come around some time soon. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

533320 +++$+++ gppande +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-28 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.219960800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for updating the Koshi river news article to ITN page. But as part of the process, I think you missed to credit me for the news update. Not that I am complaining, but I like to collect these types of [[User_talk:Gppande\/Archive_5#2008_Indian_Floods_ITN|ITN sovienier]] for my collection. Please award me one on my talkpage as per the process. Keep up your good work on ITN - I support you are last admin left on Wikipedia who cares for ITN. -- +++$+++ Thanks for updating the Koshi river news article to ITN page. But as part of the process, I think you missed to credit me for the news update. Not that I am complaining, but I like to collect these types of [[User_talk:Gppande/Archive_5#2008_Indian_Floods_ITN|ITN sovienier]] for my collection. Please award me one on my talkpage as per the process. Keep up your good work on ITN - I support you are last admin left on Wikipedia who cares for ITN. --[[User:gppande|<span style='font-family:"Arial Black";color:white;background:red'>gp</span><span style='font-family:"Arial Black";color:black'>pande</span>]] [[User talk:gppande|<span style='color:blue'>«talk»</span>]] 15:00, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
533321 +++$+++ gppande +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533320 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-06 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.220754960E09 +++$+++ Hey buddy, just thinking if I deserve a similar sovienier again this time for Indo-US nuke deal article getting to the ITN? -- +++$+++ :: Hey buddy, just thinking if I deserve a similar sovienier again this time for Indo-US nuke deal article getting to the ITN? --[[User:gppande|<span style='font-family:"Arial Black";color:white;background:red'>gp</span><span style='font-family:"Arial Black";color:black'>pande</span>]] [[User talk:gppande|<span style='color:blue'>«talk»</span>]] 19:36, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

9034 +++$+++ MadMaxDog +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-17 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.169040900E09 +++$+++ Your robot falsely removed [[assassination]] interwiki link to 'simple english' wiki. Please check so this thing doesn't happen. Thanks you.  +++$+++ Your robot falsely removed [[assassination]] interwiki link to 'simple english' wiki. Please check so this thing doesn't happen. Thanks you. [[User:MadMaxDog|MadMaxDog]] 05:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
9035 +++$+++ MadMaxDog +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9034 +++$+++ 9034 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.169053500E09 +++$+++ Actually looking at the simple english linked article finds that murder and assassination are two 'articles' on one page. Not sure if that is their style, but that is why I said your removal was wrong.  +++$+++ :Actually looking at the simple english linked article finds that murder and assassination are two 'articles' on one page. Not sure if that is their style, but that is why I said your removal was wrong. [[User:MadMaxDog|MadMaxDog]] 09:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
9036 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9034 +++$+++ 9034 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 09:27:00 +++$+++ 1.170955620E09 +++$+++ I agree that the site is real and may on some pages be related, but I also agree that it has been heavily spammed onto Wikipedia pages. Block kept. -  +++$+++ :I agree that the site is real and may on some pages be related, but I also agree that it has been heavily spammed onto Wikipedia pages. Block kept. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 09:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
9037 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9034 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-09 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.171037880E09 +++$+++ Not all related links are wanted on Wikipedia, far from it. And making such links to the same site from many articles is considered spam. Try complaining with someone else, I won't change my mind. Not based on your arguments at least. -  +++$+++ :::Not all related links are wanted on Wikipedia, far from it. And making such links to the same site from many articles is considered spam. Try complaining with someone else, I won't change my mind. Not based on your arguments at least. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 08:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

533323 +++$+++ Caknuck +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533323 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-28 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.219984860E09 +++$+++ Let me know if you see any room for improvement. <b><font color=\"FF6600\"> +++$+++ Let me know if you see any room for improvement. <b><font color="FF6600">[[User:Caknuck|caknuck]]</font> <sub><font color="black">[[User talk:Caknuck|°]]</font></sub> <font color="FF6600">is not used to being the voice of reason</font></b> 21:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
533324 +++$+++ Caknuck +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.219985700E09 +++$+++ Never mind, I see you've already updated ITN. Thanks, <b><font color=\"FF6600\"> +++$+++ ::Never mind, I see you've already updated ITN. Thanks, <b><font color="FF6600">[[User:Caknuck|caknuck]]</font> <sub><font color="black">[[User talk:Caknuck|°]]</font></sub> <font color="FF6600">is not used to being the voice of reason</font></b> 21:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

271181 +++$+++ Hipocrite +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-23 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.256286360E09 +++$+++ How exactly do I complain about you holding grudges? Why are you deflecting your bad behavior on to Giano? Where do you, exactly, get off saying that rules don't apply to Giano? How many times has he lied about his grandchildren socking for him to harass people he dislikes? You want to talk about holding grudges? Where's my apology?  +++$+++ How exactly do I complain about you holding grudges? Why are you deflecting your bad behavior on to Giano? Where do you, exactly, get off saying that rules don't apply to Giano? How many times has he lied about his grandchildren socking for him to harass people he dislikes? You want to talk about holding grudges? Where's my apology? [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] ([[User talk:Hipocrite|talk]]) 01:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271182 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.256286780E09 +++$+++ You can complain at [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification]]. But do the \"rules\" apply to him. I frankly do not understand the statement, as applied to me: \"These pages have been maintained since the Arbcom decision (some within the last few weeks), which concerns me.\" Is Giano allowed to publically post the email addressed of arbcom member? These are all emperical questions. I do not know the rules. I deleted all my files as requested, but it seems like Giano's file fall under the same rule. Am I wrong?  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :You can complain at [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification]]. But do the "rules" apply to him. I frankly do not understand the statement, as applied to me: "These pages have been maintained since the Arbcom decision (some within the last few weeks), which concerns me." Is Giano allowed to publically post the email addressed of arbcom member? These are all emperical questions. I do not know the rules. I deleted all my files as requested, but it seems like Giano's file fall under the same rule. Am I wrong?  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271183 +++$+++ Hipocrite +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 271182 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.256286900E09 +++$+++ I suggest that you stop caring about how the rules are applied to others, especially those you have had disputes with in the past, and care only about how the rules are applied to you. Again, how many times has he lied about his grandchildren socking for him to harass people he dislikes, exactly? Until you get off how other people are treated, I'm going to keep bringing this up till I see my abject apology. +++$+++ :: I suggest that you stop caring about how the rules are applied to others, especially those you have had disputes with in the past, and care only about how the rules are applied to you. Again, how many times has he lied about his grandchildren socking for him to harass people he dislikes, exactly? Until you get off how other people are treated, I'm going to keep bringing this up till I see my abject apology.[[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] ([[User talk:Hipocrite|talk]]) 01:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271184 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 271183 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.256287440E09 +++$+++ ::Sorry. you can complain at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification]]. Please do pile on, as it is obvious that my tenure at wikipedia is about to come to an end, ironically mostly based on Geogre and Giano who have been very minor blips in my editing career. But I understand that  the rules of wikipedia although unbaised, in practice will favor Geogre and Giano, sockpuppets by admins and others; such things that I do not understand.  I am not completely stupid, although very near. Do what you will to protect those that you feel right in protecting. How may times have my grandchildren been implicated. A few times in 2006, as I recall.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::: ::Sorry. you can complain at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification]]. Please do pile on, as it is obvious that my tenure at wikipedia is about to come to an end, ironically mostly based on Geogre and Giano who have been very minor blips in my editing career. But I understand that  the rules of wikipedia although unbaised, in practice will favor Geogre and Giano, sockpuppets by admins and others; such things that I do not understand.  I am not completely stupid, although very near. Do what you will to protect those that you feel right in protecting. How may times have my grandchildren been implicated. A few times in 2006, as I recall.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271185 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.256288160E09 +++$+++ I am not holding grudges. Giano continues to post on my talk page and on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification]] among othters. Mostly, I ignore his posts, so I don't consider that I am \"holding grudges\". I would appreciate it if he would stop making posts about me. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ *I am not holding grudges. Giano continues to post on my talk page and on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification]] among othters. Mostly, I ignore his posts, so I don't consider that I am "holding grudges". I would appreciate it if he would stop making posts about me. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271186 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 271185 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.256304420E09 +++$+++ [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]], you've become repetitious and increasingly strident. If you have a complaint you can describe concisely and neutrally, with relevant diffs or other links, the new monitoring format should be up & running early next week (see ArbCom). Or you could add a statement to the current ArbCom Clarification. Or at AN\/I. However, I seriously suggest you switch off your tape-recording here. -- +++$+++ ::[[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]], you've become repetitious and increasingly strident. If you have a complaint you can describe concisely and neutrally, with relevant diffs or other links, the new monitoring format should be up & running early next week (see ArbCom). Or you could add a statement to the current ArbCom Clarification. Or at AN/I. However, I seriously suggest you switch off your tape-recording here. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 06:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271187 +++$+++ Unitanode +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 271186 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.256340300E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, I just noticed this, and it seems to me simply more of the \"shoot the messenger\" mentality that pervades these issues. Please focus on mentoring Mattisse (1 line of your previous post), and less on lecturing Hipocrite (multiple lines of your previous post).  +++$+++ :::I'm sorry, I just noticed this, and it seems to me simply more of the "shoot the messenger" mentality that pervades these issues. Please focus on mentoring Mattisse (1 line of your previous post), and less on lecturing Hipocrite (multiple lines of your previous post). [[User:Unitanode|<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-variant:small-caps;color:#999999">U</span>]][[User talk:Unitanode|<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-variant:small-caps;color:#63739F">'''''A'''''</span>]] 16:25, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271188 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 271187 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.256341020E09 +++$+++ Do you think it is ok for Giano to expose the email addresses of the arbitrators, as he does on [[User:Giano\/Things to remember]], as well as what could be consider  \"gudge\" links regarding me, using my name? Do you think it is ok for me to be forced to remove any pages that could be seen as such, but he is allowed to retain his, according the the rules Karanacs has set forth above, that the links on a userspace page should only be for dispute resolution, and to '''not''' show recent activity? Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::Do you think it is ok for Giano to expose the email addresses of the arbitrators, as he does on [[User:Giano/Things to remember]], as well as what could be consider  "gudge" links regarding me, using my name? Do you think it is ok for me to be forced to remove any pages that could be seen as such, but he is allowed to retain his, according the the rules Karanacs has set forth above, that the links on a userspace page should only be for dispute resolution, and to '''not''' show recent activity? Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271189 +++$+++ Unitanode +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 271188 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.256341260E09 +++$+++ I think ''you'' should focus on ''you'', not on Giano. I'll not discuss him anyn further on this page. It's simply a distraction from what you need to be focusing on right now.  +++$+++ :::::I think ''you'' should focus on ''you'', not on Giano. I'll not discuss him anyn further on this page. It's simply a distraction from what you need to be focusing on right now. [[User:Unitanode|<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-variant:small-caps;color:#999999">U</span>]][[User talk:Unitanode|<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-variant:small-caps;color:#63739F">'''''A'''''</span>]] 16:41, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271190 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 271189 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.256341500E09 +++$+++ Do you think rules only apply to me and not Giano? What is your interest in this? I deleted all my pages as requested. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::: Do you think rules only apply to me and not Giano? What is your interest in this? I deleted all my pages as requested. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:45, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271191 +++$+++ Unitanode +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 271190 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.256341920E09 +++$+++ This issue is about you, and not anyone else. My interest in this is how your mentor Philcha treated Hipocrite in the exact same way he treated me when I raised an issue about your behavior. It's not acceptable.  +++$+++ :::::::This issue is about you, and not anyone else. My interest in this is how your mentor Philcha treated Hipocrite in the exact same way he treated me when I raised an issue about your behavior. It's not acceptable. [[User:Unitanode|<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-variant:small-caps;color:#999999">U</span>]][[User talk:Unitanode|<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-variant:small-caps;color:#63739F">'''''A'''''</span>]] 16:52, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271192 +++$+++ GiacomoReturned +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271181 +++$+++ 271185 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.256341980E09 +++$+++ Right, a few clarifications, since you obviously want to malign me. The Arbs email addresses to which you so object are a simple copy paste from here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:ARBCOM] so get your facts straight and if you don't like take it up with the Arbs who put them there. Secondly, it is quite in order to collect diffs that are more than likely to be used in an arbitration case. I suggest you behave yourself, and stop dragging in the names of people desperate to avoid you. Quite what your mentors are doing at the moment one can only imagine, but it's certainly not effective mentoring!  +++$+++ ::Right, a few clarifications, since you obviously want to malign me. The Arbs email addresses to which you so object are a simple copy paste from here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ARBCOM] so get your facts straight and if you don't like take it up with the Arbs who put them there. Secondly, it is quite in order to collect diffs that are more than likely to be used in an arbitration case. I suggest you behave yourself, and stop dragging in the names of people desperate to avoid you. Quite what your mentors are doing at the moment one can only imagine, but it's certainly not effective mentoring! [[User:GiacomoReturned|Giano]] ([[User talk:GiacomoReturned|talk]]) 16:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

9038 +++$+++ Kingjeff +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-25 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.177549920E09 +++$+++ Your bot takes zh:\u514b\u91cc\u65af\u6258\u5f17\xb7\u6885\u7b56\u723e\u5fb7 off of the Christoph Metzelder page. What exactly is wrong with it?  +++$+++ Your bot takes zh:克里斯托弗·梅策爾德 off of the Christoph Metzelder page. What exactly is wrong with it? [[User:Kingjeff|Kingjeff]] 18:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
9039 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9038 +++$+++ 9038 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.177553280E09 +++$+++ It is a problem with the traditional\/simplified orthography. If you go to the page \u514b\u91cc\u65af\u6258\u5f17\xb7\u6885\u7b56\u723e\u5fb7 on zh:, you get to \u514b\u91cc\u65af\u6258\u5f17\xb7\u6885\u7b56\u5c14\u5fb7. However, the bot uses [[Special:Export]], and on Special:Export, such an alternative orthography does not give a text, so the bot thought the page did not exist. I have now had the bot change the link to 'standard' orthography, so the link will not be removed by bots any more. -  +++$+++ :It is a problem with the traditional/simplified orthography. If you go to the page 克里斯托弗·梅策爾德 on zh:, you get to 克里斯托弗·梅策尔德. However, the bot uses [[Special:Export]], and on Special:Export, such an alternative orthography does not give a text, so the bot thought the page did not exist. I have now had the bot change the link to 'standard' orthography, so the link will not be removed by bots any more. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 19:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

533328 +++$+++ Spencer +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-05 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.220598360E09 +++$+++ Hey Tone. Thanks for your hard work in updating ITN. Whenever you post new items, can you add the tag {{tl|ITNtalk}} with the date to the talk page of the article? Thanks, ''' +++$+++ Hey Tone. Thanks for your hard work in updating ITN. Whenever you post new items, can you add the tag {{tl|ITNtalk}} with the date to the talk page of the article? Thanks, '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#006400">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:Coral">T♦</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:Coral">C</span>]]</sup> 00:06, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
533329 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533328 +++$+++ 533328 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.220644440E09 +++$+++ Acknowledged. I'll do my best to remember this every time :-) Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : Acknowledged. I'll do my best to remember this every time :-) Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
533330 +++$+++ Spencer +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533328 +++$+++ 533329 +++$+++ 2008-09-06 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.220736720E09 +++$+++ Thanks, ''' +++$+++ :: Thanks, '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#006400">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:Coral">T♦</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:Coral">C</span>]]</sup> 14:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

9042 +++$+++ Uuu87 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9042 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-13 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.192297440E09 +++$+++ So, what is with the oil-consumption in this region?It seems to me, that one of them is oil-production.  +++$+++ So, what is with the oil-consumption in this region?It seems to me, that one of them is oil-production. [[User:Uuu87|Uuu87]] 10:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
9043 +++$+++ Uuu87 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9042 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-13 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.192300140E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much!  +++$+++ :::Thank you very much! [[User:Uuu87|Uuu87]] 11:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

533331 +++$+++ Andrejj +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-05 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.220626560E09 +++$+++ Please, see the article. -- +++$+++ Please, see the article. --[[User:Andrejj|AndrejJ]] ([[User talk:Andrejj|talk]]) 07:56, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
533332 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533331 +++$+++ 533331 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.220644440E09 +++$+++ Nice. Are there any particular issues you want me to help with? --''' +++$+++ : Nice. Are there any particular issues you want me to help with? --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

533333 +++$+++ Nosleep +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-06 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.220695920E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | An extra thanks for putting [[Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's road race]] up for FA. I don't think anyone else was itching to do that, and it ''clearly'' was a brilliant idea :D  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | An extra thanks for putting [[Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's road race]] up for FA. I don't think anyone else was itching to do that, and it ''clearly'' was a brilliant idea :D [[User:Nosleep|<font style="color:#fef;background:black;">Don't fall asleep</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Nosleep|<font style="color:black">zzzzzz</font>]]</sup> 03:12, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
533334 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533333 +++$+++ 533333 +++$+++ 2008-09-06 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.220717460E09 +++$+++ Thank you! --''' +++$+++ : Thank you! --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:11, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

88889 +++$+++ Tar-Elenion +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-25 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.172443320E09 +++$+++ Hey. Do you know of any good administrator which can look into few things? A certain user which goes by the name of [[User:Nikola Smolenski|Nikola Smolenski]] along with the user [[User:Paulcicero|Paulcicero]], have recently started several revert-wars on various articles and I am wondering if there is anyone who can look into this and warn them to stop. Thank you.  +++$+++ Hey. Do you know of any good administrator which can look into few things? A certain user which goes by the name of [[User:Nikola Smolenski|Nikola Smolenski]] along with the user [[User:Paulcicero|Paulcicero]], have recently started several revert-wars on various articles and I am wondering if there is anyone who can look into this and warn them to stop. Thank you. [[User:Tar-Elenion|Tar-Elenion]] 14:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
88890 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88889 +++$+++ 88889 +++$+++ 2007-03-05 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.173165060E09 +++$+++ So what's the reason then? -- +++$+++ :So what's the reason then? --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 23:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
88891 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88889 +++$+++ 88890 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.182229320E09 +++$+++ Pretty please? ;) -- +++$+++ ::Pretty please? ;) --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 22:02, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

271193 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-23 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.256341800E09 +++$+++ (outdent) Thank you, Mattisse, for your prompt response.  +++$+++ (outdent) Thank you, Mattisse, for your prompt response. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 16:50, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271194 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271193 +++$+++ 271193 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.256342340E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. It is hard to compose myself when I and my mentors are being harassed on my talk page. I am wondering if your \"rules\" as stated above about my userspace pages, e.g. just used for dispute resolution and not have recent activity, apply to others also, or just to me. You never did provide me with documentation regarding the issue. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :You are welcome. It is hard to compose myself when I and my mentors are being harassed on my talk page. I am wondering if your "rules" as stated above about my userspace pages, e.g. just used for dispute resolution and not have recent activity, apply to others also, or just to me. You never did provide me with documentation regarding the issue. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271195 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271193 +++$+++ 271194 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.256349420E09 +++$+++ I provided a link to the documentation above [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/C68-FM-SV#Unnecessarily_divisive_behavior]].  Please be sure that you read all of the posts so that you do not ask for information that has already been provided.   +++$+++ ::I provided a link to the documentation above [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/C68-FM-SV#Unnecessarily_divisive_behavior]].  Please be sure that you read all of the posts so that you do not ask for information that has already been provided.  [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 18:57, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271196 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271193 +++$+++ 271195 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.256350560E09 +++$+++ Sorry. I can't read all my posts, as one message banner may mean one or eight posts. Sorry.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::Sorry. I can't read all my posts, as one message banner may mean one or eight posts. Sorry.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271197 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271193 +++$+++ 271196 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.256350740E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, not reading all of your posts can only lead you to frustration or misunderstanding.  You can always review threads on your talk page, or step back through the diffs to see what you may have missed.  I sometimes miss posts on my talk, so my habit is that when I see the orange bar, I read that post, and then I step backwards through the diffs to make sure I didn't miss a previous post.   +++$+++ :::: Mattisse, not reading all of your posts can only lead you to frustration or misunderstanding.  You can always review threads on your talk page, or step back through the diffs to see what you may have missed.  I sometimes miss posts on my talk, so my habit is that when I see the orange bar, I read that post, and then I step backwards through the diffs to make sure I didn't miss a previous post.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271198 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271193 +++$+++ 271197 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.256351460E09 +++$+++ There are lots of ways to handle it. I often click the \"hist\" button (for my talk page, on my watchlist) when I have a new message. '' +++$+++ ::::: There are lots of ways to handle it. I often click the "hist" button (for my talk page, on my watchlist) when I have a new message. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 19:31, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271199 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271193 +++$+++ 271198 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.256352060E09 +++$+++ That's a good idea - much better than slogging through the actual posts trying to figure out which ones are new. Especially since most of them are downers anyway. Most posts I would just as soon not receive, sad to say. How to discourage posts on my page? I wish I had the nerve to just archive my page and put an end to it, like you did.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::: That's a good idea - much better than slogging through the actual posts trying to figure out which ones are new. Especially since most of them are downers anyway. Most posts I would just as soon not receive, sad to say. How to discourage posts on my page? I wish I had the nerve to just archive my page and put an end to it, like you did.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:41, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271200 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271193 +++$+++ 271199 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.256354280E09 +++$+++ Editors will not always respect your wishes, but you have to be as courteous as you can in response. It is rare for me to close a discussion on my talk page: I've done so twice in recent memory, in both cases to stop the escalation of a disagreement on my talk page, which I would like to be a place for de-escalation. Sandy has recently requested a similar drawing of a line [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASandyGeorgia&action=historysubmit&diff=321601835&oldid=321601684 on her talk page here] and that is admirable in my view. Any action like that requires courtesy and respect for all involved to be successful: if editors understand your good intentions, they are more likely to respect your wishes. '' +++$+++ :::::::Editors will not always respect your wishes, but you have to be as courteous as you can in response. It is rare for me to close a discussion on my talk page: I've done so twice in recent memory, in both cases to stop the escalation of a disagreement on my talk page, which I would like to be a place for de-escalation. Sandy has recently requested a similar drawing of a line [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASandyGeorgia&action=historysubmit&diff=321601835&oldid=321601684 on her talk page here] and that is admirable in my view. Any action like that requires courtesy and respect for all involved to be successful: if editors understand your good intentions, they are more likely to respect your wishes. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 20:18, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271201 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271193 +++$+++ 271200 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.256355300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your suggestions. I find editors generally disrespect my page and my wishes, which is probably my fault. I can take only so much chatter. I think staying away from FAC and all related pages will help considerably. I have no idea how these various editors, with whom I have never had any direct contact, find their way here. Must be the IRC or some other form of communication that they spread the word. I just try not to respond. But it is discouraging and very unpleasant. Wikipedia's meta-problems are becoming very apparent to me. No wonder editors are being driven away! I do think the solution is to stay away from FAC and FAR, from where all trouble seems to spring.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::::::Thanks for your suggestions. I find editors generally disrespect my page and my wishes, which is probably my fault. I can take only so much chatter. I think staying away from FAC and all related pages will help considerably. I have no idea how these various editors, with whom I have never had any direct contact, find their way here. Must be the IRC or some other form of communication that they spread the word. I just try not to respond. But it is discouraging and very unpleasant. Wikipedia's meta-problems are becoming very apparent to me. No wonder editors are being driven away! I do think the solution is to stay away from FAC and FAR, from where all trouble seems to spring.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
271202 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271193 +++$+++ 271201 +++$+++ 2009-10-24 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.256444340E09 +++$+++ I'm always glad if any suggestion of mine proves helpful. Concerning your response, Wikipedia, like most of human life, is full of unpleasantness and problems, but at least withdrawing from Wikipedia is slightly less fatal. You are learning to stay away from comments, places, and issues which trouble you. However, that means you should not make metacomments either. Editors come to your talk page for several reasons: you are a prolific and frequent editor, so you will appear on the watchlists of many; the controversies surrounding you are well known, and many editors will have an opinion on them. There is no reason to invent conspiracies on IRC or elsewhere to explain it. Such speculation, and also your sweeping assertion that all trouble seems to spring from FAC and FAR, is ''contrary to your plan'', and you should not post such comments here or anywhere on Wikipedia. '' +++$+++ :::::::::I'm always glad if any suggestion of mine proves helpful. Concerning your response, Wikipedia, like most of human life, is full of unpleasantness and problems, but at least withdrawing from Wikipedia is slightly less fatal. You are learning to stay away from comments, places, and issues which trouble you. However, that means you should not make metacomments either. Editors come to your talk page for several reasons: you are a prolific and frequent editor, so you will appear on the watchlists of many; the controversies surrounding you are well known, and many editors will have an opinion on them. There is no reason to invent conspiracies on IRC or elsewhere to explain it. Such speculation, and also your sweeping assertion that all trouble seems to spring from FAC and FAR, is ''contrary to your plan'', and you should not post such comments here or anywhere on Wikipedia. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 21:19, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
271203 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271193 +++$+++ 271202 +++$+++ 2009-10-24 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.256446920E09 +++$+++ Okay. Point well taken. I'm trying to see things in perspective. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::::::: Okay. Point well taken. I'm trying to see things in perspective. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:02, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

9050 +++$+++ N +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-28 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.214638140E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Andre_Engels}} this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags\/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 00:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. <small>Do you want to [[Template:Bots#Message notification opt out|opt out]] of receiving this notice?<\/small><!-- Template:Image source --> - +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Andre_Engels}} this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 00:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. <small>Do you want to [[Template:Bots#Message notification opt out|opt out]] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:Image source --> -[[User:N|Nard]] 00:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
9051 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9050 +++$+++ 9050 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.224775200E09 +++$+++ The 'when' is on 25 September. The 'why' is because there is a long history of detrimentous changes by your students. On http:\/\/eu.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Aparteko:Log&type=block&page=Lankide%3A212.142.143.114 you find a list of all blockings of the ip, see also [[:eu:Lankide_eztabaida:212.142.143.114|Lankide eztabaida:212.142.143.114]]. On 23 September they had been blocked for one day by TXiKi after submitting an article \"L'Enfant Sauvage\" with as its text \"UEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE IJOS DE PUTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA MARICONESSSSSSSSSSSS\". On the 25th I saw the ip return with \"Faxa ez dakit zer den!!! Horrexegatik ari natzaizue galdetzen!!!\" for the article \"Faxa\" and \"aaaahhh!!\" for the article \"Memory stick\". Because of the long ranging history of nonsense articles and other vandalism from your ip address, I then decided to block it for a longer time. I will now unblock the ip, but '''please''' ask your students that if they want to post material that is ''not'' a wikipedia article to do it on [[:eu:Wikipedia:Proba_orria|Wikipedia:Proba orria]] and not in the article namespace, because subsequent misconstrued edits will likely lead to a new ban. And yes, the ban was on the Basque Wikipedia, not on the whole, so they should have been able to edit on the Spanish Wikipedia or any other language. -  +++$+++ :The 'when' is on 25 September. The 'why' is because there is a long history of detrimentous changes by your students. On http://eu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aparteko:Log&type=block&page=Lankide%3A212.142.143.114 you find a list of all blockings of the ip, see also [[:eu:Lankide_eztabaida:212.142.143.114|Lankide eztabaida:212.142.143.114]]. On 23 September they had been blocked for one day by TXiKi after submitting an article "L'Enfant Sauvage" with as its text "UEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE IJOS DE PUTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA MARICONESSSSSSSSSSSS". On the 25th I saw the ip return with "Faxa ez dakit zer den!!! Horrexegatik ari natzaizue galdetzen!!!" for the article "Faxa" and "aaaahhh!!" for the article "Memory stick". Because of the long ranging history of nonsense articles and other vandalism from your ip address, I then decided to block it for a longer time. I will now unblock the ip, but '''please''' ask your students that if they want to post material that is ''not'' a wikipedia article to do it on [[:eu:Wikipedia:Proba_orria|Wikipedia:Proba orria]] and not in the article namespace, because subsequent misconstrued edits will likely lead to a new ban. And yes, the ban was on the Basque Wikipedia, not on the whole, so they should have been able to edit on the Spanish Wikipedia or any other language. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] ([[User talk:Andre Engels#top|talk]]) 08:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

533339 +++$+++ Eleassar +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-10 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.221083880E09 +++$+++ Hi, I think it would make sense to rename the article to ''Patria case'' or something similar, per [[Wikipedia:Words to avoid#Scandal, affair]]. It should also be revised for POV. -- +++$+++ Hi, I think it would make sense to rename the article to ''Patria case'' or something similar, per [[Wikipedia:Words to avoid#Scandal, affair]]. It should also be revised for POV. --[[User:Eleassar|'''Eleassar''']] <sup>[[User talk:Eleassar|my talk]]</sup> 14:58, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
533340 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533339 +++$+++ 533339 +++$+++ 2008-09-10 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.221084780E09 +++$+++ Could be, but most of the media refer to it as affair, what is in compliance with common name guideline (at least most of the people would look for it under that name). The guideline you quote recommends to use the word affair only in well established cases - this indeed is not historic case but will probably be in some time. So renaming now and renaming back in a couple of years? Hm... doesn't make much sense for me... Do we have any other alternative names we could use? And what part of the article do you think could contain POV? Perhaps it would make sense to ask someone who has yet not been involved in writing this article to check. --''' +++$+++ : Could be, but most of the media refer to it as affair, what is in compliance with common name guideline (at least most of the people would look for it under that name). The guideline you quote recommends to use the word affair only in well established cases - this indeed is not historic case but will probably be in some time. So renaming now and renaming back in a couple of years? Hm... doesn't make much sense for me... Do we have any other alternative names we could use? And what part of the article do you think could contain POV? Perhaps it would make sense to ask someone who has yet not been involved in writing this article to check. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
533341 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533339 +++$+++ 533340 +++$+++ 2008-09-10 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.221084960E09 +++$+++ 100k+ Google hits for Afera Patria would suggest that this name is widely used. Just a comment. --''' +++$+++ :: 100k+ Google hits for Afera Patria would suggest that this name is widely used. Just a comment. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

9053 +++$+++ Fayenatic_london +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-18 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.227071100E09 +++$+++ Given your interest in articles about names, you would be very welcome to join [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthroponymy]]. There is plenty of work to do!  -  +++$+++ Given your interest in articles about names, you would be very welcome to join [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthroponymy]]. There is plenty of work to do!  - [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User_talk:Fayenatic_london|(talk)]] 21:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
9054 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9053 +++$+++ 9053 +++$+++ 2008-11-18 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.227081540E09 +++$+++ Actually, my objection was mostly based on their inclusion on [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]]. -  +++$+++ :Actually, my objection was mostly based on their inclusion on [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]]. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] ([[User talk:Andre Engels#top|talk]]) 23:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

533342 +++$+++ Eleassar +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533342 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-10 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.221089160E09 +++$+++ I won't object the usage of the word ''affair'' if the allegiations are proven. However, using this word now seems pov to me. Per [[Affair]]: 'Affair' may be used as a euphemism and in some cases to add glamour to an illicit liaison or it may be used to slander. In addition to that, we're talking about the English not Slovenian (and sensationalistic) name. In English, we have 512 hits for \"patria affair\" and 892 hits for \"patria case\" using Google. -- +++$+++ I won't object the usage of the word ''affair'' if the allegiations are proven. However, using this word now seems pov to me. Per [[Affair]]: 'Affair' may be used as a euphemism and in some cases to add glamour to an illicit liaison or it may be used to slander. In addition to that, we're talking about the English not Slovenian (and sensationalistic) name. In English, we have 512 hits for "patria affair" and 892 hits for "patria case" using Google. --[[User:Eleassar|'''Eleassar''']] <sup>[[User talk:Eleassar|my talk]]</sup> 16:26, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
533343 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533342 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-10 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.221102540E09 +++$+++ True. I will move this discussion to the article's talkpage. Let's get some more opinions before further action. --''' +++$+++ :: True. I will move this discussion to the article's talkpage. Let's get some more opinions before further action. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

533344 +++$+++ Doma-w +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533344 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-11 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.221177300E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone! I saw that you have changed the infobox back at [[Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics \u2013 Men's road race]]. But for Olympic pages this infobox <nowiki>{{Olympic Games Cycling}}<\/nowiki> is for the main page [[Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics]] and the infobox <nowiki>{{Footer olympic champions road cycling men}}<\/nowiki> is for the winner (in this case Samuel S\xe1nchez) and for the special result page like [[Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics \u2013 Men's road race]]. Please see also e.g. [[Athletics at the 2008 Summer Olympics]] and [[Athletics at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's 100 metres]]. Kind regards  +++$+++ Hi Tone! I saw that you have changed the infobox back at [[Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Men's road race]]. But for Olympic pages this infobox <nowiki>{{Olympic Games Cycling}}</nowiki> is for the main page [[Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics]] and the infobox <nowiki>{{Footer olympic champions road cycling men}}</nowiki> is for the winner (in this case Samuel Sánchez) and for the special result page like [[Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Men's road race]]. Please see also e.g. [[Athletics at the 2008 Summer Olympics]] and [[Athletics at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's 100 metres]]. Kind regards [[User:Doma-w|Doma-w]] ([[User talk:Doma-w|talk]]) 16:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
533345 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533344 +++$+++ 533344 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.221193380E09 +++$+++ Really?  I thought there is a more specific box, like 100 m at the Summer Olympics, that has links to all previous events. The Olympic champion box should only be for the champion, I think... --''' +++$+++ : Really?  I thought there is a more specific box, like 100 m at the Summer Olympics, that has links to all previous events. The Olympic champion box should only be for the champion, I think... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:23, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
533346 +++$+++ Doma-w +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533344 +++$+++ 533345 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.221272700E09 +++$+++ You can also see that there was a question on the talk page about the history of this event, please see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Cycling_at_the_2008_Summer_Olympics_%E2%80%93_Men%27s_road_race#history.3F]. Kind regards  +++$+++ ::You can also see that there was a question on the talk page about the history of this event, please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cycling_at_the_2008_Summer_Olympics_%E2%80%93_Men%27s_road_race#history.3F]. Kind regards [[User:Doma-w|Doma-w]] ([[User talk:Doma-w|talk]]) 19:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
533347 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533344 +++$+++ 533346 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.221276000E09 +++$+++ Now I am confuesed. Check the marathon events, they have year-by-year infobox instead champion one. --''' +++$+++ ::: Now I am confuesed. Check the marathon events, they have year-by-year infobox instead champion one. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:20, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
533348 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533344 +++$+++ 533347 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.221276060E09 +++$+++ Actually, it's fine. I take that back. Better template, indeed. Regards. --''' +++$+++ :::: Actually, it's fine. I take that back. Better template, indeed. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
533349 +++$+++ Doma-w +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533344 +++$+++ 533348 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.221284280E09 +++$+++ Yes I know about the marathon template, but I think there is also no need for this template... Kind regards  +++$+++ ::::: Yes I know about the marathon template, but I think there is also no need for this template... Kind regards [[User:Doma-w|Doma-w]] ([[User talk:Doma-w|talk]]) 22:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

9059 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-19 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.237501140E09 +++$+++ Before nominating a talk page redirect for deletion, check to see if after the page move a disambiguation page has been created at the article. If so, just remove the talkpage redirect and replace with {{tl|DisambigProject}}. Presto, problem solved. If no dab is there, you can do {{tl|db-g6}}, it's speedy bait.  +++$+++ Before nominating a talk page redirect for deletion, check to see if after the page move a disambiguation page has been created at the article. If so, just remove the talkpage redirect and replace with {{tl|DisambigProject}}. Presto, problem solved. If no dab is there, you can do {{tl|db-g6}}, it's speedy bait. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] ([[User talk:Carlossuarez46|talk]]) 15:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
9060 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9059 +++$+++ 9059 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.237504440E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... I went through [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion]] first, but it didn't look to me like G6 applied... As for the other possibility - I dislike throwing templates on a page or talk page and then pretending I did something useful. -  +++$+++ :Hmmm... I went through [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion]] first, but it didn't look to me like G6 applied... As for the other possibility - I dislike throwing templates on a page or talk page and then pretending I did something useful. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] ([[User talk:Andre Engels#top|talk]]) 16:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

271205 +++$+++ GoodDay +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-25 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.256527740E09 +++$+++ Howdy Mattisse. Haven't I seen you on hockey articles, years ago?  +++$+++ Howdy Mattisse. Haven't I seen you on hockey articles, years ago? [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 20:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
271206 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271205 +++$+++ 271205 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.256538900E09 +++$+++ Hi, I nay have don some copy editing of hockey articles, but it is not a subject that I amd familiar with. I can do only general copy articles on such articles. Regards,\u2014 +++$+++ :Hi, I nay have don some copy editing of hockey articles, but it is not a subject that I amd familiar with. I can do only general copy articles on such articles. Regards,—[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:35, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
271207 +++$+++ GoodDay +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271205 +++$+++ 271206 +++$+++ 2009-10-26 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.256588880E09 +++$+++ Okie Dokie.  +++$+++ ::Okie Dokie. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 13:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

9062 +++$+++ Manning Bartlett +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-05 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.254735960E09 +++$+++ Is something wrong?  +++$+++ Is something wrong? [[User:Manning Bartlett|Manning]] ([[User talk:Manning Bartlett|talk]]) 02:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
9063 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9062 +++$+++ 9062 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 06:17:00 +++$+++ 1.254748620E09 +++$+++ But deeper down I guess it's irritation about Wikipedia not working the way it should. It's supposed to work in such a way that if you don't agree about something, you discuss and find a compromise that both can agree with (in the end, that is the essence of NPOV). In actuality, such a thing is rare. If there is a conflict, what usually happens is that the person with the longest breath wins - either by silently reverting to their own version without discussion, or by keeping discussing until the other party gives up. And even if you manage to get into a discussion, it is easy enough to inject your own POV in 10 other pages in the time it costs the others to discuss its removal on one. The Wikipedia system works well if everyone is actually working towards neutrality. Many do, but the number who don't are high enough to disrupt everything. And our methods of dealing with them are at best inefficient, more often ineffective or non-existent. -  +++$+++ :But deeper down I guess it's irritation about Wikipedia not working the way it should. It's supposed to work in such a way that if you don't agree about something, you discuss and find a compromise that both can agree with (in the end, that is the essence of NPOV). In actuality, such a thing is rare. If there is a conflict, what usually happens is that the person with the longest breath wins - either by silently reverting to their own version without discussion, or by keeping discussing until the other party gives up. And even if you manage to get into a discussion, it is easy enough to inject your own POV in 10 other pages in the time it costs the others to discuss its removal on one. The Wikipedia system works well if everyone is actually working towards neutrality. Many do, but the number who don't are high enough to disrupt everything. And our methods of dealing with them are at best inefficient, more often ineffective or non-existent. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] ([[User talk:Andre Engels#top|talk]]) 06:17, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
9064 +++$+++ Manning Bartlett +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9062 +++$+++ 9063 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.254749160E09 +++$+++ The \"noise\" factor can be overwhelming at times. The best bet is simply to ignore it. Tune it out. You will be criticised no matter what you do. But remember that nothing about Wikipedia is worth getting upset over. It's just a website. Cheers  +++$+++ ::The "noise" factor can be overwhelming at times. The best bet is simply to ignore it. Tune it out. You will be criticised no matter what you do. But remember that nothing about Wikipedia is worth getting upset over. It's just a website. Cheers [[User:Manning Bartlett|Manning]] ([[User talk:Manning Bartlett|talk]]) 06:26, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
9065 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9062 +++$+++ 9064 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.254752820E09 +++$+++ No, to be honest I don't remember, but it doesn't surprise me either - as you write, everyone knew each other in that time, and almost everyone from that time worked together (I can remember that back then I would at the end of the day look what others had been doing on Wikipedia, and sometimes making small corrections and additions - all in an hour or so). Did I do the right thing? I don't know. I didn't do anything, in fact... But I think Wikipedia is more than just a website. I love it. I hate it. And really, what happened here is just a little issue. I have done much worse over past conflicts... -  +++$+++ :::No, to be honest I don't remember, but it doesn't surprise me either - as you write, everyone knew each other in that time, and almost everyone from that time worked together (I can remember that back then I would at the end of the day look what others had been doing on Wikipedia, and sometimes making small corrections and additions - all in an hour or so). Did I do the right thing? I don't know. I didn't do anything, in fact... But I think Wikipedia is more than just a website. I love it. I hate it. And really, what happened here is just a little issue. I have done much worse over past conflicts... - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] ([[User talk:Andre Engels#top|talk]]) 07:27, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

45201 +++$+++ Music2611 +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-15 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.242417840E09 +++$+++ Hi, I don't know if you keep FAcs on your watchlist (in which case this message would be redundant), but I have replied to your comments on the ''House'' FAc. It would be great if you could take another look. Thanks.-- +++$+++ Hi, I don't know if you keep FAcs on your watchlist (in which case this message would be redundant), but I have replied to your comments on the ''House'' FAc. It would be great if you could take another look. Thanks.--[[User:Music2611|<span style="color:#CC5500;">'''Music'''</span>]][[User Talk:Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''26/'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''11'''</span>]] 13:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
45202 +++$+++ Music2611 +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45201 +++$+++ 45201 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.243013940E09 +++$+++ Hi again, I don't mean to bother you, but it has been quite around the ''House'' FAc and I have adressed all of your comments. It would be great if you could reply. Thanks.-- +++$+++ :Hi again, I don't mean to bother you, but it has been quite around the ''House'' FAc and I have adressed all of your comments. It would be great if you could reply. Thanks.--[[User:Music2611|<span style="color:#CC5500;">'''Music'''</span>]][[User Talk:Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''26/'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''11'''</span>]] 10:39, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
45203 +++$+++ Music2611 +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45201 +++$+++ 45202 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.243107480E09 +++$+++ Hi, I was about to send you a message about how I was in a position where I couldn't do anything about the image because there were users opposing to the images as well as supporting the image. However, as I read the page I realized that there were only two users really against the image, Fasach Nua and Bignole. Further discussion regarding the image takes place on the FAc page.-- +++$+++ ::Hi, I was about to send you a message about how I was in a position where I couldn't do anything about the image because there were users opposing to the images as well as supporting the image. However, as I read the page I realized that there were only two users really against the image, Fasach Nua and Bignole. Further discussion regarding the image takes place on the FAc page.--[[User:Music2611|<span style="color:#CC5500;">'''Music'''</span>]][[User Talk:Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''26/'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''11'''</span>]] 12:38, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
45204 +++$+++ Music2611 +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45201 +++$+++ 45203 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.243626180E09 +++$+++ I'll problably renominate it today or tomorrow, there's no waiting period right? One question though, did you merge the spin-off section with the recurring characters section? If so, why? That's it, have nice day.-- +++$+++ :::I'll problably renominate it today or tomorrow, there's no waiting period right? One question though, did you merge the spin-off section with the recurring characters section? If so, why? That's it, have nice day.--[[User:Music2611|<span style="color:#CC5500;">'''Music'''</span>]][[User Talk:Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''26/'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''11'''</span>]] 12:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
45205 +++$+++ Music2611 +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45201 +++$+++ 45204 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.243627440E09 +++$+++ My bad, I just noticed your talk page comments, I'll see what I can do about the critical reception.-- +++$+++ ::::My bad, I just noticed your talk page comments, I'll see what I can do about the critical reception.--[[User:Music2611|<span style="color:#CC5500;">'''Music'''</span>]][[User Talk:Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''26/'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''11'''</span>]] 13:04, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
45206 +++$+++ Music2611 +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45201 +++$+++ 45205 +++$+++ 2009-05-30 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.243722780E09 +++$+++ What exactly should be done about the critical reception section?-- +++$+++ :::::What exactly should be done about the critical reception section?--[[User:Music2611|<span style="color:#CC5500;">'''Music'''</span>]][[User Talk:Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''26/'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''11'''</span>]] 15:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
45207 +++$+++ Music2611 +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45201 +++$+++ 45206 +++$+++ 2009-06-03 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.244084940E09 +++$+++ Added some info; I'm planning to add some more regarding reception of seperate seasons, but you can take a look at how it looks so far. Later.-- +++$+++ ::::::Added some info; I'm planning to add some more regarding reception of seperate seasons, but you can take a look at how it looks so far. Later.--[[User:Music2611|<span style="color:#CC5500;">'''Music'''</span>]][[User Talk:Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''26/'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''11'''</span>]] 20:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
45208 +++$+++ Music2611 +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45201 +++$+++ 45207 +++$+++ 2009-06-05 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.244221200E09 +++$+++ I'm finished, could you take a look and give me some feedback before it goes back to FAC? Thanks.-- +++$+++ :::::::I'm finished, could you take a look and give me some feedback before it goes back to FAC? Thanks.--[[User:Music2611|<span style="color:#CC5500;">'''Music'''</span>]][[User Talk:Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''26/'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''11'''</span>]] 10:00, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
45209 +++$+++ Music2611 +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45201 +++$+++ 45208 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.244406240E09 +++$+++ The article is at FAC [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/House (TV series)\/archive2|here]]. Thank you for your help.-- +++$+++ ::::::::The article is at FAC [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/House (TV series)/archive2|here]]. Thank you for your help.--[[User:Music2611|<span style="color:#CC5500;">'''Music'''</span>]][[User Talk:Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''26/'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Music2611|<span style="color: #FF9912;">'''11'''</span>]] 13:24, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

271209 +++$+++ Joopercoopers +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-26 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.256600640E09 +++$+++ Yesterday, as the the sock was quoting Philcha, it seemed possible that Philcha had been using an alternative account and responded to hypocrite having forgotten to log into his Philcha account. That possibility isn't evidence, and whilst I don't apologise for thinking it, I do apologise for saying it before I'd had a really good hard think and look at the evidence today. I can find no evidence that it is you or any of your mentors and I apologise for any distress I may have caused, particularly to Philcha. Kind regards -- +++$+++ Yesterday, as the the sock was quoting Philcha, it seemed possible that Philcha had been using an alternative account and responded to hypocrite having forgotten to log into his Philcha account. That possibility isn't evidence, and whilst I don't apologise for thinking it, I do apologise for saying it before I'd had a really good hard think and look at the evidence today. I can find no evidence that it is you or any of your mentors and I apologise for any distress I may have caused, particularly to Philcha. Kind regards --[[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]] ([[User talk:Joopercoopers|talk]]) 16:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
271210 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271209 +++$+++ 271209 +++$+++ 2009-10-26 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.256602320E09 +++$+++ Yes, your post[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Risker&diff=prev&oldid=322061620] on Risker's page was  unfortunate, as was much of the dialogue that followed on her page. I do not think that spreading the arbitration problem to many pages is helpful. Risker's responses were not reassuring to me. I'm glad you have ended your quest. All too many people are willing to air my dirty linen. Thank you for desisting further. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Yes, your post[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Risker&diff=prev&oldid=322061620] on Risker's page was  unfortunate, as was much of the dialogue that followed on her page. I do not think that spreading the arbitration problem to many pages is helpful. Risker's responses were not reassuring to me. I'm glad you have ended your quest. All too many people are willing to air my dirty linen. Thank you for desisting further. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:12, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

394727 +++$+++ Gurt Posh +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.311777720E09 +++$+++ Hi, can you please undelete [[:Penrose Prozess]] to [[:User:MadameBruxelles]]? The new editor created a legitimate German translation of [[:Penrose process]] in error on English Wikipedia, and would like to copy the source to [[:de:Penrose Prozess]] where it belongs. Better still, if you could undelete it to [[:de:Penrose Prozess]] (if that's possible) to save her having to copy the source. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi, can you please undelete [[:Penrose Prozess]] to [[:User:MadameBruxelles]]? The new editor created a legitimate German translation of [[:Penrose process]] in error on English Wikipedia, and would like to copy the source to [[:de:Penrose Prozess]] where it belongs. Better still, if you could undelete it to [[:de:Penrose Prozess]] (if that's possible) to save her having to copy the source. Thanks, [[User:Gurt Posh|Gurt Posh]] ([[User talk:Gurt Posh|talk]]) 07:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
394728 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394727 +++$+++ 394727 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.311806160E09 +++$+++ Madame asked the same question she asked you on the help desk ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Help_desk#My_first_article_.22Penrose_Prozess.22_was_deleted_within_2_minutes_of_it_being_online.2C_help_me_get_it_back_please]) where I replied, I was intending to give her the content if she got back in touch but it seems another admin has already emailed it to her-- +++$+++ :Madame asked the same question she asked you on the help desk ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk#My_first_article_.22Penrose_Prozess.22_was_deleted_within_2_minutes_of_it_being_online.2C_help_me_get_it_back_please]) where I replied, I was intending to give her the content if she got back in touch but it seems another admin has already emailed it to her--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 15:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
394729 +++$+++ Gurt Posh +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ 394727 +++$+++ 394728 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311839160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the help. [[User:Gurt Posh|Gurt Posh]] ([[User talk:Gurt Posh|talk]]) 00:46, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

271212 +++$+++ Mutual monarch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271212 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-27 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.256640240E09 +++$+++ Just a heads up: [[User:Literaturegeek|Literaturegeek]] suspects I am a sockpuppet of you, but I don't know why. See my talk page. (This is the third time I've been accused of sockpuppetry by this user.)  +++$+++ Just a heads up: [[User:Literaturegeek|Literaturegeek]] suspects I am a sockpuppet of you, but I don't know why. See my talk page. (This is the third time I've been accused of sockpuppetry by this user.) [[User:Mutual monarch|Mutual monarch]] ([[User talk:Mutual monarch|talk]]) 03:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271213 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271212 +++$+++ 271212 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.256677200E09 +++$+++ On what basis are you accused of being my sockpuppet. Indeed, this is getting very nasty.  Well, you should be cleared as you are not. Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ :On what basis are you accused of being my sockpuppet. Indeed, this is getting very nasty.  Well, you should be cleared as you are not. Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:00, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271214 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271212 +++$+++ 271213 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.256683260E09 +++$+++ So it is possible just to stick those accusations on someone's page and leave them there? There doesn't seem to be any attempt at an investigation. It seems more of a harassment technique. \u2014 +++$+++ ::So it is possible just to stick those accusations on someone's page and leave them there? There doesn't seem to be any attempt at an investigation. It seems more of a harassment technique. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271215 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271212 +++$+++ 271214 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.256683380E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I agree with Philcha: since you know you're innocent, just ignore them completely.  It's good for the investigations to continue, since they will exonerate you and possibly uncover other socks, but when you know you're innocent, there's no reason to let it trouble you or even got involved.   +++$+++ ::: Mattisse, I agree with Philcha: since you know you're innocent, just ignore them completely.  It's good for the investigations to continue, since they will exonerate you and possibly uncover other socks, but when you know you're innocent, there's no reason to let it trouble you or even got involved.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271216 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271212 +++$+++ 271215 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.256694060E09 +++$+++ SilkTork is looking into it and has offered help to [[User talk:Mutual monarch]]. Thank goodness. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::SilkTork is looking into it and has offered help to [[User talk:Mutual monarch]]. Thank goodness. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

9069 +++$+++ Gordonrox24 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-23 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.279927440E09 +++$+++ Hey there. I would ask you not do that again. It is disruptive to our project. Consider this a warning.-- +++$+++ Hey there. I would ask you not do that again. It is disruptive to our project. Consider this a warning.--[[User:Gordonrox24|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36B">Gordonrox24</span>]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Gordonrox24|<sup><span style="font-family:Arial;color:red">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 16:24, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
9070 +++$+++  +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9069 +++$+++ 9069 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I dunno what's up, but please try to be more polite and less pointy :( 16:26, 23 July 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ :I dunno what's up, but please try to be more polite and less pointy :( 16:26, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
9071 +++$+++ Gordonrox24 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9069 +++$+++ 9070 +++$+++ 2010-07-23 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.279927740E09 +++$+++ That's not pointy it is the truth. I'm not going to template a regular, and Andre knows better.-- +++$+++ ::That's not pointy it is the truth. I'm not going to template a regular, and Andre knows better.--[[User:Gordonrox24|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36B">Gordonrox24</span>]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Gordonrox24|<sup><span style="font-family:Arial;color:red">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 16:29, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
9072 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9069 +++$+++ 9071 +++$+++ 2010-07-23 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.279929600E09 +++$+++ Yeah, you're right. I shouldn't do that kind of thing, but I'm too emotional for my own good at times. -  +++$+++ :::Yeah, you're right. I shouldn't do that kind of thing, but I'm too emotional for my own good at times. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] ([[User talk:Andre Engels#top|talk]]) 17:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
9073 +++$+++ Snowolf +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9069 +++$+++ 9071 +++$+++ 2010-07-23 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.279934880E09 +++$+++ Looks like fail indentation and fail signing by me, it was meant to be addressed at Andre not you. Sorry for the mess up. <i><b> +++$+++ :::Looks like fail indentation and fail signing by me, it was meant to be addressed at Andre not you. Sorry for the mess up. <i><b>[[User:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">Snowolf</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">How can I help?</font>]]</small></sup></b></i> 18:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
9074 +++$+++ Gordonrox24 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9069 +++$+++ 9073 +++$+++ 2010-07-23 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.279935120E09 +++$+++ It's alright. Thanks Andre. If your emotions take the better of you, I suggest taking a break, stepping back, and coming back with a calm and open mind. Thanks all!-- +++$+++ ::::It's alright. Thanks Andre. If your emotions take the better of you, I suggest taking a break, stepping back, and coming back with a calm and open mind. Thanks all!--[[User:Gordonrox24|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36B">Gordonrox24</span>]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Gordonrox24|<sup><span style="font-family:Arial;color:red">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 18:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

533358 +++$+++ Spencer +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-13 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.221366180E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your amazing work at keeping ITN up and running well today. Great job! ''' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your amazing work at keeping ITN up and running well today. Great job! '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#006400">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:Coral">T♦</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:Coral">C</span>]]</sup> 21:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
533359 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533358 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.221366420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for this one. With the short difference between last reset and the last update, I didn't bother with the reset... I'll keep it in mind anyway. --''' +++$+++ :: Thanks for this one. With the short difference between last reset and the last update, I didn't bother with the reset... I'll keep it in mind anyway. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
533360 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533358 +++$+++ 533358 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.221415680E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted (twice), because it reads like an advertisement. Remember, WP is an encyclopedia, therefore it is inapropriate to include things like ''Published rates for tickets is at $8 for a 2 day pass and $5 for a 1 day pass. According to the organisers, children under the age of 6 get in for free.'' I suggest you start the article from the scratch, if you have any problems, feel free to ask. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted (twice), because it reads like an advertisement. Remember, WP is an encyclopedia, therefore it is inapropriate to include things like ''Published rates for tickets is at $8 for a 2 day pass and $5 for a 1 day pass. According to the organisers, children under the age of 6 get in for free.'' I suggest you start the article from the scratch, if you have any problems, feel free to ask. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:08, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

271217 +++$+++ Literaturegeek  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-28 10:28:00 +++$+++ 1.256750880E09 +++$+++ Philcha I am not looking for a fight with anyone and mattisse I am not trying to harass you. To the contrary when we had a brief bumping of heads several months ago I specifically said to the admin investigating, mastcell not to involve you as I did not want you to get any grief over a transient disagreement. I did ask mutual monarch to explain this,[[User_talk:Literaturegeek#Sockpuppet_tags]] but I have gotten no answer. I notice that this account, [[User_talk:Mattisse#Warning_to_Hipocrite]] has contributions to articles for deletions. A couple of the other accounts that I also have doubts about also have an edit history to articles for deletions and reasons to suspect that they were not newbies when they started the accounts. There are several reasons which I can list if requested why I <s>think<\/s> thought that the account is yours but I would like a response to this following question. If mutual monarch (or other accounts) are not you mattisse, is it possible that someone is trying to make editors such as myself think that it is you in order to cause you grief? After reading the talk page of [[User talk:As instructed]] and [[User_talk:Risker#Quandary]] just before posting this message to you this possibilty occured to me. If this is the case then I don't want to fall for their games and wrongly cause you any drama so I think discussing this with you first rather than going gun hoe into a SPI is the best option. If I am wrong I will apologise as well. I just want to get to the bottom of this, I wish no malice towards you. :)-- +++$+++ Philcha I am not looking for a fight with anyone and mattisse I am not trying to harass you. To the contrary when we had a brief bumping of heads several months ago I specifically said to the admin investigating, mastcell not to involve you as I did not want you to get any grief over a transient disagreement. I did ask mutual monarch to explain this,[[User_talk:Literaturegeek#Sockpuppet_tags]] but I have gotten no answer. I notice that this account, [[User_talk:Mattisse#Warning_to_Hipocrite]] has contributions to articles for deletions. A couple of the other accounts that I also have doubts about also have an edit history to articles for deletions and reasons to suspect that they were not newbies when they started the accounts. There are several reasons which I can list if requested why I <s>think</s> thought that the account is yours but I would like a response to this following question. If mutual monarch (or other accounts) are not you mattisse, is it possible that someone is trying to make editors such as myself think that it is you in order to cause you grief? After reading the talk page of [[User talk:As instructed]] and [[User_talk:Risker#Quandary]] just before posting this message to you this possibilty occured to me. If this is the case then I don't want to fall for their games and wrongly cause you any drama so I think discussing this with you first rather than going gun hoe into a SPI is the best option. If I am wrong I will apologise as well. I just want to get to the bottom of this, I wish no malice towards you. :)--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 10:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
271218 +++$+++ Literaturegeek  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271217 +++$+++ 271217 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.256751900E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, am I right in assuming you did a lot of work to british royalty articles? I wonder if the mutual monarch name was chosen to make it look like it was you using sockpuppet? Just a thought, might be nothing at all. After talking to user Silktork, I am believing now that it was not you behind the sockpuppet(s), so I apologise to you for any distress caused, I just want to get to the bottom of who is using mutual monarch and what accounts I need to apologise to etc.-- +++$+++ :Mattisse, am I right in assuming you did a lot of work to british royalty articles? I wonder if the mutual monarch name was chosen to make it look like it was you using sockpuppet? Just a thought, might be nothing at all. After talking to user Silktork, I am believing now that it was not you behind the sockpuppet(s), so I apologise to you for any distress caused, I just want to get to the bottom of who is using mutual monarch and what accounts I need to apologise to etc.--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 10:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
271219 +++$+++ Joopercoopers +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271217 +++$+++ 271218 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.256753400E09 +++$+++ Literaturegeek - please see my apology to Mattisse above. Whilst it is certain that As Instructed is an alternative account of someone, it is clearly not that of Mattisse or her mentors, the editing pattern and times don't fit. I regret shooting my mouth of earlier this week, and am troubled this has stirred up further antagonism to Mattisse. Please take this elsewhere as you are barking up the wrong tree. -- +++$+++ ::Literaturegeek - please see my apology to Mattisse above. Whilst it is certain that As Instructed is an alternative account of someone, it is clearly not that of Mattisse or her mentors, the editing pattern and times don't fit. I regret shooting my mouth of earlier this week, and am troubled this has stirred up further antagonism to Mattisse. Please take this elsewhere as you are barking up the wrong tree. --[[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]] ([[User talk:Joopercoopers|talk]]) 11:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
271220 +++$+++ Literaturegeek  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271217 +++$+++ 271219 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.256753700E09 +++$+++ There are two trees I was barking up if you read my message and I now do not believe mattisse is responsible, so I don't quite understand your response. Jooper, please see my apology to mattisse before your message. The conversation has moved to my talk page. I shall not respond here anymore. :)-- +++$+++ :::There are two trees I was barking up if you read my message and I now do not believe mattisse is responsible, so I don't quite understand your response. Jooper, please see my apology to mattisse before your message. The conversation has moved to my talk page. I shall not respond here anymore. :)--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 11:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
271221 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271217 +++$+++ 271220 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.256760780E09 +++$+++ To [[User:Literaturegeek]], no I have not done work on British royalty articles. To [[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]], this is an outcome of spreading issues about my arbitration thither and yon to the pages of others, such as Risker's, and her unfortunate decision to let  unfounded accusations stay there for others to read. Although you asked her to archive it, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Risker&diff=prev&oldid=322096556] she has not.  This arbitration clarification has  turned into a huge mess that is a credit to no one except my mentors\/advisers who are attempting to step up to the plate and cool it down. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::To [[User:Literaturegeek]], no I have not done work on British royalty articles. To [[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]], this is an outcome of spreading issues about my arbitration thither and yon to the pages of others, such as Risker's, and her unfortunate decision to let  unfounded accusations stay there for others to read. Although you asked her to archive it, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Risker&diff=prev&oldid=322096556] she has not.  This arbitration clarification has  turned into a huge mess that is a credit to no one except my mentors/advisers who are attempting to step up to the plate and cool it down. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
271222 +++$+++ Literaturegeek  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271217 +++$+++ 271221 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.256832780E09 +++$+++ Ah, I was refering to the [[Buckingham Palace]]; maybe should have said FA ''review'' rather than ''work''. :)-- +++$+++ :::::Ah, I was refering to the [[Buckingham Palace]]; maybe should have said FA ''review'' rather than ''work''. :)--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 09:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271223 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271217 +++$+++ 271222 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.256847120E09 +++$+++ Sorry. I consider that an architecture article rather than an article on British royalty. None of this has anything to do with you accusations of sockpuppets. Working or reviewing that article should not have opened me up to sockpuppet charges.   You said above that you would not respond any more on this page and I wish you would stick to your word. You have now posted 12 times on my page regarding this issue.    Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::: Sorry. I consider that an architecture article rather than an article on British royalty. None of this has anything to do with you accusations of sockpuppets. Working or reviewing that article should not have opened me up to sockpuppet charges.   You said above that you would not respond any more on this page and I wish you would stick to your word. You have now posted 12 times on my page regarding this issue.    Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

9077 +++$+++ Erik Evrest +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.308483540E09 +++$+++ Oh ya, I also ask to release the [[WP:SOC|SockPuppet]] I was there named [[:id:User: Erik Evermtus]] at Indonesian Wikipedia because this account will be used as a substitute if the main account stolen by others such as [[:id:User:Kenrick95Sock]]. Thank you -- +++$+++ Oh ya, I also ask to release the [[WP:SOC|SockPuppet]] I was there named [[:id:User: Erik Evermtus]] at Indonesian Wikipedia because this account will be used as a substitute if the main account stolen by others such as [[:id:User:Kenrick95Sock]]. Thank you --[[User:Erik Evrest|Erik Evrest]] ([[User talk:Erik Evrest|talk]]) 04:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
9078 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9077 +++$+++ 9077 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 10:28:00 +++$+++ 1.308504480E09 +++$+++ Stewards have the task to support communities, not to go against community decisions on the request of single persons. If you want to be unblocked on the Indonesian Wikipedia, it is the sysops and other users from the Indonesian Wikipedia that you should be contacting, not me or other Stewards. -  +++$+++ :Stewards have the task to support communities, not to go against community decisions on the request of single persons. If you want to be unblocked on the Indonesian Wikipedia, it is the sysops and other users from the Indonesian Wikipedia that you should be contacting, not me or other Stewards. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] ([[User talk:Andre Engels#top|talk]]) 10:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
9079 +++$+++ Erik Evrest +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9077 +++$+++ 9078 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.308509100E09 +++$+++ But, that means the same as [[WP:ANOT#GAME|abuse of authority]]. So blocking is feasible status revoked and the blocker can be removed his admin status -- +++$+++ ::But, that means the same as [[WP:ANOT#GAME|abuse of authority]]. So blocking is feasible status revoked and the blocker can be removed his admin status --[[User:Erik Evrest|Erik Evrest]] ([[User talk:Erik Evrest|talk]]) 11:45, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
9080 +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ Andre Engels +++$+++ 9077 +++$+++ 9079 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.308585360E09 +++$+++ I cannot judge from your few lines whether or not you have been blocked for good reason; however, if you are unable to find sysops or regulars on the Indonesian wiki who agree with you, you probably have been. It would definitely mean that I am not in a position to just go against their decision based on nothing more than a statement from you. -  +++$+++ :::I cannot judge from your few lines whether or not you have been blocked for good reason; however, if you are unable to find sysops or regulars on the Indonesian wiki who agree with you, you probably have been. It would definitely mean that I am not in a position to just go against their decision based on nothing more than a statement from you. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] ([[User talk:Andre Engels#top|talk]]) 08:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
9081 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9077 +++$+++ 9077 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.310121780E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Micmac DDE 214 1953.jpg]] - [[:File:RCN Micmac1.jpg]] - [[:File:Micmac DDE 214 1949.jpg]] There is no linkable source, no specific date, and no proof that these were released by the DND\/RCNA (except for a watermark & a statement that one image is \"Believed to be a reproduction\" and another is \"Uncertain but believed to be...\"); it would be best if you can provide all of the aforementioned information and then place a note here or at [[WP:Requests for undeletion]].  Without all of that information, the images can not be restored.  +++$+++ :[[:File:Micmac DDE 214 1953.jpg]] - [[:File:RCN Micmac1.jpg]] - [[:File:Micmac DDE 214 1949.jpg]] There is no linkable source, no specific date, and no proof that these were released by the DND/RCNA (except for a watermark & a statement that one image is "Believed to be a reproduction" and another is "Uncertain but believed to be..."); it would be best if you can provide all of the aforementioned information and then place a note here or at [[WP:Requests for undeletion]].  Without all of that information, the images can not be restored. [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 03:43, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

263657 +++$+++ John Smith's +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-24 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.153791900E09 +++$+++ So can you please tell me how I should suggest it for deletion? I was thinking about one of the \"automatic tags\", where there isn't copyright or proper source information. Could I use the \"unknown|day=|month=\" tag? Is there a different automatic tag I should use? Or should I use a slightly longer manual technique. Your help would be appreciated - thanks!  +++$+++ So can you please tell me how I should suggest it for deletion? I was thinking about one of the "automatic tags", where there isn't copyright or proper source information. Could I use the "unknown|day=|month=" tag? Is there a different automatic tag I should use? Or should I use a slightly longer manual technique. Your help would be appreciated - thanks! [[User:John Smith's|John Smith&#39;s]] 18:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
263658 +++$+++ John Smith's +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263657 +++$+++ 263657 +++$+++ 2006-07-24 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.153795080E09 +++$+++ I decided to use the \"auto tag\". If you think that's incorrect, some feedback would be appreciated.  +++$+++ :I decided to use the "auto tag". If you think that's incorrect, some feedback would be appreciated. [[User:John Smith's|John Smith&#39;s]] 19:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

271224 +++$+++ Fainites +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-27 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.256695020E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Mattisse\/sandblox&diff=next&oldid=322130845 this] a good idea?  +++$+++ Mattisse, is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mattisse/sandblox&diff=next&oldid=322130845 this] a good idea? [[User:Fainites|Fainites]] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Fainites|barley]]</small></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Fainites|<small>scribs</small>]] 18:57, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271225 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271224 +++$+++ 271224 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.256695680E09 +++$+++ Yes. I must prepare for [[User:Giano\/Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case]] Are you saying it is not a good idea to do so?  \u2014 +++$+++ :Yes. I must prepare for [[User:Giano/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case]] Are you saying it is not a good idea to do so?  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:08, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271226 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271224 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.256697360E09 +++$+++ If it came to an actual case, your best defence is to keep calm and courteous, starting ''now''. If you behave as I've just advised and Giano continues to spread attacks all over the place, it will be short and unpleasant for Giano. -- +++$+++ ::**If it came to an actual case, your best defence is to keep calm and courteous, starting ''now''. If you behave as I've just advised and Giano continues to spread attacks all over the place, it will be short and unpleasant for Giano. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 19:36, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271227 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271224 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.256698140E09 +++$+++ The  specific diff Fainites referred to[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Mattisse\/sandblox&diff=next&oldid=322130845] I want to keep as it is a September, 2008 diff that began the whole problem and took me a long time to find. The torments list  was a spontaneous list and I can never remember the names on it. It now has become reified through constant repetition, although it was never used again. I need a way of keeping track of the names, as it  is  implied that those on the list are being constantly harassed by me.  However, I can remove it. I can remove the Giano diffs as I have now used them in the arb situation, I believe. Thanks, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::*The  specific diff Fainites referred to[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mattisse/sandblox&diff=next&oldid=322130845] I want to keep as it is a September, 2008 diff that began the whole problem and took me a long time to find. The torments list  was a spontaneous list and I can never remember the names on it. It now has become reified through constant repetition, although it was never used again. I need a way of keeping track of the names, as it  is  implied that those on the list are being constantly harassed by me.  However, I can remove it. I can remove the Giano diffs as I have now used them in the arb situation, I believe. Thanks, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:49, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271228 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271224 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.256698620E09 +++$+++ (ec and probably redundant) I agree with Philcha. While it may seem to be prudent to prepare for an arbcom case that someone is setting up, it is almost always better to stay above the fray. Each and every negative comment or action that an editor makes, whether it seems justified or not, will come back to haunt that person. I know it is hard to ignore and not react to charges, insults, barbs, or what have you, but it is always better to either completely ignore them or, only if it is essential, to respond politely. (Note to self: make use of this maxim!) -- +++$+++ :::::(ec and probably redundant) I agree with Philcha. While it may seem to be prudent to prepare for an arbcom case that someone is setting up, it is almost always better to stay above the fray. Each and every negative comment or action that an editor makes, whether it seems justified or not, will come back to haunt that person. I know it is hard to ignore and not react to charges, insults, barbs, or what have you, but it is always better to either completely ignore them or, only if it is essential, to respond politely. (Note to self: make use of this maxim!) --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 19:57, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271229 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271224 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.256698800E09 +++$+++ I just want to keep the one diff that Fainites objected to.  I am in the process of entering the other two into the arbitration clarification, if I cannot keep them on the page. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::::I just want to keep the one diff that Fainites objected to.  I am in the process of entering the other two into the arbitration clarification, if I cannot keep them on the page. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:00, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271230 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271224 +++$+++ 271225 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.256701380E09 +++$+++ I do not have Word document and Notepad does not save wiki formatting.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::I do not have Word document and Notepad does not save wiki formatting.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271231 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271224 +++$+++ 271224 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.256699400E09 +++$+++ I removed the list immediately when requested above.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Mattisse\/sandblox&diff=prev&oldid=322396029 Current revision as of 19:51, 27 October 2009] Since most of the people on it I have had no voluntary contact with, the list is meaningless. But I have removed it. Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ :I removed the list immediately when requested above.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mattisse/sandblox&diff=prev&oldid=322396029 Current revision as of 19:51, 27 October 2009] Since most of the people on it I have had no voluntary contact with, the list is meaningless. But I have removed it. Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:10, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271232 +++$+++ Fainites +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271224 +++$+++ 271231 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.256700300E09 +++$+++ Thank you Mattisse. A wise move.  +++$+++ ::Thank you Mattisse. A wise move. [[User:Fainites|Fainites]] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Fainites|barley]]</small></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Fainites|<small>scribs</small>]] 20:25, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

176276 +++$+++ Kurosuke88 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-09 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.252481760E09 +++$+++ --<span style=\"border:1px solid;color:#008800\"> +++$+++ --<span style="border:1px solid;color:#008800">[[User talk:Kurosuke88|<font style="color:#00800;">&nbsp;'''Kurosuke'''&nbsp;</font>]]</span> 00:36, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
176277 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176276 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.252506720E09 +++$+++ I hope this helps, but as before, feel free to ask any more questions. &mdash; +++$+++ ::I hope this helps, but as before, feel free to ask any more questions. &mdash;[[User:BillC|<span style="background:#803020;color:white;font-variant:small-caps">'''BillC'''</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 07:32, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

9082 +++$+++ Planetary Chaos Redux +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311169920E09 +++$+++ I ran across some link spam that I can not revert due to page lock. Can you help? The article is [[Kolkata]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ I ran across some link spam that I can not revert due to page lock. Can you help? The article is [[Kolkata]]. Thank you. [[User:Planetary Chaos Redux|Planetary Chaos Redux]] ([[User talk:Planetary Chaos Redux|talk]]) 06:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
9083 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9082 +++$+++ 9082 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311170280E09 +++$+++ {{done}} I hope ;)  +++$+++ :{{done}} I hope ;) [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 06:58, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
9084 +++$+++ Planetary Chaos Redux +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9082 +++$+++ 9083 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311170640E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I don't know why I havn't been auto-confirmed yet.  +++$+++ ::Thank you. I don't know why I havn't been auto-confirmed yet. [[User:Planetary Chaos Redux|Planetary Chaos Redux]] ([[User talk:Planetary Chaos Redux|talk]]) 07:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

533372 +++$+++ Jepa +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533372 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-23 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.222189080E09 +++$+++ Hi. We already have the article \"[[Jokela school shooting]]\" so shouldn't we also have \"[[Kauhajoki school shooting]]\"? It's basically a similar incident. --  +++$+++ Hi. We already have the article "[[Jokela school shooting]]" so shouldn't we also have "[[Kauhajoki school shooting]]"? It's basically a similar incident. -- [[User:Jepa|Jepa]] ([[User talk:Jepa|talk]]) 09:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
533373 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533372 +++$+++ 533372 +++$+++ 2008-09-23 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.222189260E09 +++$+++ Sure. When I created the initial stub, I was still gathering info. I see it's moved already. --''' +++$+++ : Sure. When I created the initial stub, I was still gathering info. I see it's moved already. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
533374 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533372 +++$+++ 533373 +++$+++ 2008-09-23 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.222189320E09 +++$+++ On the other hand, let's wait a while. The redirect exists already so it should be easy to find. --''' +++$+++ :: On the other hand, let's wait a while. The redirect exists already so it should be easy to find. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
533375 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533372 +++$+++ 533372 +++$+++ 2008-09-26 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.222449600E09 +++$+++ It was deleted in the prod process. Since you object, I will recreate it and pur it to AfD, standard procedure. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : It was deleted in the prod process. Since you object, I will recreate it and pur it to AfD, standard procedure. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:20, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

9087 +++$+++ Jenks24 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.311687360E09 +++$+++ Hi there, any chance you could take the protection level on [[Planking (fad)]] from full to semi? The only vandalism on the article is from IPs\/non-autoconfirmed and the recent spamming issue was also by a non-autoconfirmed user (plus that user, {{user|Econroy56}}, is now indef-blocked anyway). I don't see any sort of edit war that justifies full protection, but feel free to correct me if I've missed anything. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi there, any chance you could take the protection level on [[Planking (fad)]] from full to semi? The only vandalism on the article is from IPs/non-autoconfirmed and the recent spamming issue was also by a non-autoconfirmed user (plus that user, {{user|Econroy56}}, is now indef-blocked anyway). I don't see any sort of edit war that justifies full protection, but feel free to correct me if I've missed anything. Cheers, [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 06:36, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
9088 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9087 +++$+++ 9087 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.311734880E09 +++$+++ {{done}} & Let me know if there are any problems with IP\/socks after this expires.  +++$+++ :{{done}} & Let me know if there are any problems with IP/socks after this expires. [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 19:48, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
9089 +++$+++ Jenks24 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9087 +++$+++ 9088 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311781560E09 +++$+++ Thanks and will do. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Thanks and will do. Cheers, [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 08:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

271233 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-27 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.256702580E09 +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse, nothing to do with lists (!!!) but I notice your comment that you do not have MS Word. You might find [[Open Office]] useful, and it's free. The only requisite is that you'll have to download [[Java (software platform)]] first, but that's also free. I'm gradually converting to Open Office. For word processing, I suggest you save Open Office documents as [[Rich Text Format]] - this is one of the options when save a document. RTF files can be shared both ways between Open Office's Writer and MS Word. Open Office's Writer is less sophisticated, probably about where MS Word was in the early 1990s - but that is plenty enough for most purposes, including sending letters. -- +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse, nothing to do with lists (!!!) but I notice your comment that you do not have MS Word. You might find [[Open Office]] useful, and it's free. The only requisite is that you'll have to download [[Java (software platform)]] first, but that's also free. I'm gradually converting to Open Office. For word processing, I suggest you save Open Office documents as [[Rich Text Format]] - this is one of the options when save a document. RTF files can be shared both ways between Open Office's Writer and MS Word. Open Office's Writer is less sophisticated, probably about where MS Word was in the early 1990s - but that is plenty enough for most purposes, including sending letters. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 21:03, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271234 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271233 +++$+++ 271233 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.256702820E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I'll think about it. But it is probably too complicated for me to get involved in. I never liked MS Word on my WindowsMe and I am just as glad to be rid of it and its excessive markup. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks! I'll think about it. But it is probably too complicated for me to get involved in. I never liked MS Word on my WindowsMe and I am just as glad to be rid of it and its excessive markup. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:07, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
271235 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271233 +++$+++ 271234 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.256794920E09 +++$+++ I also dislike MS Word - it is a crude word processing programme. I held onto my WordPerfect for as long as I could, but as Word users could not read WordPerfect (though WordPerfect could read Word) I found it difficult to send out copy to editors. For a while I ran both systems - but that just became silly. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ ::I also dislike MS Word - it is a crude word processing programme. I held onto my WordPerfect for as long as I could, but as Word users could not read WordPerfect (though WordPerfect could read Word) I found it difficult to send out copy to editors. For a while I ran both systems - but that just became silly. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 22:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

271236 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-29 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.256870520E09 +++$+++ I was thinking of nominating [[Gin Tama]] to GA, but I'm concerned about the prose. Could you take a look at it? Regards. +++$+++ I was thinking of nominating [[Gin Tama]] to GA, but I'm concerned about the prose. Could you take a look at it? Regards.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 19:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271237 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271236 +++$+++ 271236 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.256870700E09 +++$+++ OK. I'll go through it and change a few things. You are always free to revert anything I do. Looking at it quickly, the prose seems quite good! Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :OK. I'll go through it and change a few things. You are always free to revert anything I do. Looking at it quickly, the prose seems quite good! Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271238 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271236 +++$+++ 271237 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.256870820E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Take your time. +++$+++ ::Thanks. Take your time.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 19:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

438422 +++$+++ Dbutler1986 +++$+++ Arvindn +++$+++ 438422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-05 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.207393380E09 +++$+++ I noticed your name on the Hindu Mythology WikiProject. I'm hoping you can take a look at [[Asura]] - I deleted a reference to two Asura \"brothers\" I couldn't find anything about (and also, I couldn't make sense of the sentence) named Sumbha and Nisumbha. I was hoping maybe you'd know something about them, or if they even existed in mythology; or that you know someone who does, at least. That way they can be added back in with proper citations. Also, I'm not sure about Maitreya Buddha being an Asura in Hinduism, nor Vairocana Buddha. I left a note on the Talk page also, about disambiguation - I don't know who has the authority to decide whether or not my suggestion should be acted on, and I didn't want to step on any toes. Thanks!  -- +++$+++ I noticed your name on the Hindu Mythology WikiProject. I'm hoping you can take a look at [[Asura]] - I deleted a reference to two Asura "brothers" I couldn't find anything about (and also, I couldn't make sense of the sentence) named Sumbha and Nisumbha. I was hoping maybe you'd know something about them, or if they even existed in mythology; or that you know someone who does, at least. That way they can be added back in with proper citations. Also, I'm not sure about Maitreya Buddha being an Asura in Hinduism, nor Vairocana Buddha. I left a note on the Talk page also, about disambiguation - I don't know who has the authority to decide whether or not my suggestion should be acted on, and I didn't want to step on any toes. Thanks!  --[[User:Dbutler1986|Dbutler1986]] ([[User talk:Dbutler1986|talk]]) 04:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
438423 +++$+++ Arvindn +++$+++ Arvindn +++$+++ 438422 +++$+++ 438422 +++$+++ 2008-04-05 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.207393800E09 +++$+++ Yup, Shumbha and Nishumba indeed exist, except someone left out the aitches. Google turns up plenty with the right spelling. Can't be of any more help, sorry.  +++$+++ :Yup, Shumbha and Nishumba indeed exist, except someone left out the aitches. Google turns up plenty with the right spelling. Can't be of any more help, sorry. [[User:Arvindn|Arvindn]] ([[User talk:Arvindn#top|talk]]) 04:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

9094 +++$+++ AlastairRonaldo +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9094 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311957240E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:AlastairRonaldo|Alastair Carr]] ([[User talk:AlastairRonaldo|talk]]) 09:34, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
9095 +++$+++ AlastairRonaldo +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9094 +++$+++ 9094 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 06:14:00 +++$+++ 1.312031640E09 +++$+++ OK, thank you for that information. Am I allowed to use hyper-links from article space to user space? I.e. [[Alastair Carr]] directing people to my User: AlastairRonaldo page?  +++$+++ :OK, thank you for that information. Am I allowed to use hyper-links from article space to user space? I.e. [[Alastair Carr]] directing people to my User: AlastairRonaldo page? [[User:AlastairRonaldo|Alastair Carr]] ([[User talk:AlastairRonaldo|talk]]) 06:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

271239 +++$+++ EncMstr +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271239 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-29 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.256872680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for all the photos you've added to articles.  However, I reverted your addition to [[Salmon River (Clackamas County, Oregon)]] as that photo is on the coast, and the article is inland, near Mount Hood.  \u2014 +++$+++ Thanks for all the photos you've added to articles.  However, I reverted your addition to [[Salmon River (Clackamas County, Oregon)]] as that photo is on the coast, and the article is inland, near Mount Hood.  —[[user:EncMstr|EncMstr]] ([[user talk:EncMstr|talk]]) 20:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271240 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271239 +++$+++ 271239 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.256872860E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for letting me know. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :OK, thanks for letting me know. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271241 +++$+++ Katr67 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271239 +++$+++ 271240 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.256883180E09 +++$+++ I was going to add it to [[Salmon River (Lincoln County, Oregon)]] but that article is so short that I don't think it can hold another picture right now. It only needs to be expanded a bit to make room though.  +++$+++ ::I was going to add it to [[Salmon River (Lincoln County, Oregon)]] but that article is so short that I don't think it can hold another picture right now. It only needs to be expanded a bit to make room though. [[User:Katr67|Katr67]] ([[User talk:Katr67|talk]]) 23:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271242 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271239 +++$+++ 271241 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.256883480E09 +++$+++ You probably should grab it, as once it is moved to the Commons you may not be able to find it again. (This has been my experience, anyway.) Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::You probably should grab it, as once it is moved to the Commons you may not be able to find it again. (This has been my experience, anyway.) Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

9098 +++$+++ Mabdul +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.312313460E09 +++$+++ can you explain me the deletion of [[:File talk:Norwegian-road-sign-757.svg]] and [[File talk:Norwegian-road-sign-757.svg]]? I really don't know what was on the image file, but the talkpage was correctly marked with the AFC banner. (was there a file uploaded?) <small style=\"font:bold 12px Courier New;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap\"><font color=\"#000\"> +++$+++ can you explain me the deletion of [[:File talk:Norwegian-road-sign-757.svg]] and [[File talk:Norwegian-road-sign-757.svg]]? I really don't know what was on the image file, but the talkpage was correctly marked with the AFC banner. (was there a file uploaded?) <small style="font:bold 12px Courier New;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap"><font color="#000">[[User talk:Mabdul|mabdul]]</font></small> 12:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
9099 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9098 +++$+++ 9098 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.312368000E09 +++$+++ The file is not here - [[:File:Norwegian-road-sign-757.svg]] is now on commons; we don't track commons files here, you'll need to do that over there if you'd like.  These talk pages are considered as orphaned and are deleted under either G6 or G8 criteria.  +++$+++ :The file is not here - [[:File:Norwegian-road-sign-757.svg]] is now on commons; we don't track commons files here, you'll need to do that over there if you'd like.  These talk pages are considered as orphaned and are deleted under either G6 or G8 criteria. [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 03:40, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
9100 +++$+++ Mabdul +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9098 +++$+++ 9099 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312399440E09 +++$+++ Wrong! The file is at commons, but wikiprojects were added here! <small style=\"font:bold 12px Courier New;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap\"><font color=\"#000\"> +++$+++ ::Wrong! The file is at commons, but wikiprojects were added here! <small style="font:bold 12px Courier New;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap"><font color="#000">[[User talk:Mabdul|mabdul]]</font></small> 12:24, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
9101 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9098 +++$+++ 9098 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.312368180E09 +++$+++ Non-free use images such as logos are not allowed in the 'user space', i.e. user sandboxes.  Once the article is moved to the article space, the images can be restored & put on it; just leave a note at [[WP:Requests for undeletion]] and let them know the name of the file & the name of the article.   +++$+++ :Non-free use images such as logos are not allowed in the 'user space', i.e. user sandboxes.  Once the article is moved to the article space, the images can be restored & put on it; just leave a note at [[WP:Requests for undeletion]] and let them know the name of the file & the name of the article.  [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 03:43, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

271243 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.256883600E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Brooks Range Mountains.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Brooks Range Mountains.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Brooks Range Mountains.jpg]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:File:Brooks Range Mountains.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Brooks Range Mountains.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Brooks Range Mountains.jpg]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 23:20, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271244 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.256883600E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Part of Cayo del Oso Creek which empties into Corpus Christi Bay.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Part of Cayo del Oso Creek which empties into Corpus Christi Bay.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Part of Cayo del Oso Creek which empties into Corpus Christi Bay.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Part of Cayo del Oso Creek which empties into Corpus Christi Bay.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 23:20, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271245 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.256883660E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Viewing man-made canals in the marsh in Louisiana, Barataria Basin.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Viewing man-made canals in the marsh in Louisiana, Barataria Basin.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Viewing man-made canals in the marsh in Louisiana, Barataria Basin.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Viewing man-made canals in the marsh in Louisiana, Barataria Basin.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 23:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271246 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.256883660E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Shrimp, snapper, grouper, and stone crab fishing boats at Cortez, Florida.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Shrimp, snapper, grouper, and stone crab fishing boats at Cortez, Florida.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Shrimp, snapper, grouper, and stone crab fishing boats at Cortez, Florida.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Shrimp, snapper, grouper, and stone crab fishing boats at Cortez, Florida.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 23:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271247 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.256883720E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Historical marker for fishing village of Cortez, Florida.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Historical marker for fishing village of Cortez, Florida.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Historical marker for fishing village of Cortez, Florida.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Historical marker for fishing village of Cortez, Florida.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 23:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271248 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.256883780E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Brooks Range Mountains.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Brooks Range Mountains.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Brooks Range Mountains.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Brooks Range Mountains.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 23:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271249 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.256883840E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Part of Cayo del Oso Creek which empties into Corpus Christi Bay.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Part of Cayo del Oso Creek which empties into Corpus Christi Bay.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Part of Cayo del Oso Creek which empties into Corpus Christi Bay.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Part of Cayo del Oso Creek which empties into Corpus Christi Bay.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 23:24, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271250 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.256883900E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Viewing man-made canals in the marsh in Louisiana, Barataria Basin.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Viewing man-made canals in the marsh in Louisiana, Barataria Basin.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Viewing man-made canals in the marsh in Louisiana, Barataria Basin.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Viewing man-made canals in the marsh in Louisiana, Barataria Basin.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 23:25, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271251 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.256883960E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Shrimp, snapper, grouper, and stone crab fishing boats at Cortez, Florida.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Shrimp, snapper, grouper, and stone crab fishing boats at Cortez, Florida.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Shrimp, snapper, grouper, and stone crab fishing boats at Cortez, Florida.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Shrimp, snapper, grouper, and stone crab fishing boats at Cortez, Florida.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 23:26, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
271252 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 271243 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.256883960E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Historical marker for fishing village of Cortez, Florida.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Historical marker for fishing village of Cortez, Florida.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Historical marker for fishing village of Cortez, Florida.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Historical marker for fishing village of Cortez, Florida.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 23:26, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

9102 +++$+++ MichaelLNorth +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312410240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the 'heads up' regarding the orphaned images. Someone had blanked the page that they were used on, and now that this edit has been reverted, there is no longer any reason to delete them. \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #333333;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ Thanks for the 'heads up' regarding the orphaned images. Someone had blanked the page that they were used on, and now that this edit has been reverted, there is no longer any reason to delete them. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #333333;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:MichaelLNorth|Mike]]</b> : [[User_talk:MichaelLNorth|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#009900;">&nbsp;tlk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 15:24, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
9103 +++$+++ Ww2censor +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9102 +++$+++ 9102 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.312411980E09 +++$+++ Occasionally when checking [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~jason\/orphaned_images.php?limit=50&allNS=&cat=All+non-free+media the toolserver orphaned images list] I notice images that have become orphaned due to improper edits of various kinds. It is certainly worth checking the last few article edits for any orphaned images.  +++$+++ :Occasionally when checking [http://toolserver.org/~jason/orphaned_images.php?limit=50&allNS=&cat=All+non-free+media the toolserver orphaned images list] I notice images that have become orphaned due to improper edits of various kinds. It is certainly worth checking the last few article edits for any orphaned images. [[User:Ww2censor|ww2censor]] ([[User talk:Ww2censor|talk]]) 15:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

525805 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525805 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-31 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.199156280E09 +++$+++ \"Member of\" is more accurately and ''unambiguously'' descriptive than \"compete in\".  +++$+++ "Member of" is more accurately and ''unambiguously'' descriptive than "compete in". [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 18:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
525806 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525805 +++$+++ 525805 +++$+++ 2007-12-31 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.199156640E09 +++$+++ I would welcome the chance for a wider audience to weigh in on this semantics issue.  +++$+++ :I would welcome the chance for a wider audience to weigh in on this semantics issue. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 19:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

9104 +++$+++ Austex +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.312427820E09 +++$+++ Please see discussion on my talk page in response to your recommendation for deletion.  Thanks every much.  <small style=\"white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Please see discussion on my talk page in response to your recommendation for deletion.  Thanks every much.  <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;">[[User:Austex|<span style="color:#008080;">Austex</span>]] • [[User talk:Austex|<span style="color:Black;White;">Talk</span>]] </small> 20:17, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
9105 +++$+++ Austex +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9104 +++$+++ 9104 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312455240E09 +++$+++ News information added on my discussion page.  Thank you.  <small style=\"white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ : News information added on my discussion page.  Thank you.  <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;">[[User:Austex|<span style="color:#008080;">Austex</span>]] • [[User talk:Austex|<span style="color:Black;White;">Talk</span>]] </small> 03:54, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

9106 +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9106 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.312493880E09 +++$+++ I've been a bit inactive and I'm just now working through my talk page's archives. I saw [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Tim1357\/Archive_7#Suggest_amending_the_bot_message your message] and wanted to let you know that I did a database query to re-create the list. The list is a bit old (from July 25), so I can re-generate it if you wish. It's in tab-seperated format, so if you need me to re-format it, just give me a buzz. The results (10,065 lines; 385kb) are [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~tim1357\/Static\/Reports\/OversizedNonFreeMedia here]. Cheers!  +++$+++ I've been a bit inactive and I'm just now working through my talk page's archives. I saw [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tim1357/Archive_7#Suggest_amending_the_bot_message your message] and wanted to let you know that I did a database query to re-create the list. The list is a bit old (from July 25), so I can re-generate it if you wish. It's in tab-seperated format, so if you need me to re-format it, just give me a buzz. The results (10,065 lines; 385kb) are [http://toolserver.org/~tim1357/Static/Reports/OversizedNonFreeMedia here]. Cheers! [[User:Tim1357|<font color="Blue" face="Arial" >Tim]]</font><font color="Red" face="Optima" >[[Special:Contributions/Tim1357|1357]]</font> <sup><font face="Times new roman" size = 2 >[[User talk:Tim1357|talk]]</font></sup> 14:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
9107 +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9106 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.312493880E09 +++$+++ P.S. The first column is the file's name, the second is the image's hight, and the second is the width. I chose all images where height*width>=500000.  +++$+++ ::P.S. The first column is the file's name, the second is the image's hight, and the second is the width. I chose all images where height*width>=500000. [[User:Tim1357|<font color="Blue" face="Arial" >Tim]]</font><font color="Red" face="Optima" >[[Special:Contributions/Tim1357|1357]]</font> <sup><font face="Times new roman" size = 2 >[[User talk:Tim1357|talk]]</font></sup> 14:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
9108 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9106 +++$+++ 9106 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312541400E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much - I'll take a look, it appears that this is what I was looking for... will let you know - & thanks!  +++$+++ :Thank you so much - I'll take a look, it appears that this is what I was looking for... will let you know - & thanks! [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 03:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

533396 +++$+++ Jthphoton +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533396 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-18 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.224373020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Jthphoton|Jthphoton]] ([[User talk:Jthphoton|talk]]) 16:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
533397 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533396 +++$+++ 533396 +++$+++ 2008-10-18 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.224380340E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article I deleted was considerably shorter than your argumentation why I should restore it :-) Ok, it's back but I invite you to expand it and if possible, add a referecnce because it is in a poor shape at the moment. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article I deleted was considerably shorter than your argumentation why I should restore it :-) Ok, it's back but I invite you to expand it and if possible, add a referecnce because it is in a poor shape at the moment. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

9109 +++$+++ Gyan4u +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9109 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-06 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.312616340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Gyan4u|Gyan4u]] ([[User talk:Gyan4u|talk]]) 00:39, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
9110 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9109 +++$+++ 9109 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.312621500E09 +++$+++ I'm not seeing any indication on the site that the information is either copyrighted or public domain. However, the parent organization has in its disclaimer [http:\/\/www.mp.gov.in\/disclaimer\/] that materials can be used only 'after taking proper permission by sending a mail to us...' with lots of conditions.  I highly doubt that they would release anything, given those conditions, via the [[WP:OTRS]] system, but you can feel free to try.  Just follow the OTRS link for information on how to get the proper release for the image.   +++$+++ :I'm not seeing any indication on the site that the information is either copyrighted or public domain. However, the parent organization has in its disclaimer [http://www.mp.gov.in/disclaimer/] that materials can be used only 'after taking proper permission by sending a mail to us...' with lots of conditions.  I highly doubt that they would release anything, given those conditions, via the [[WP:OTRS]] system, but you can feel free to try.  Just follow the OTRS link for information on how to get the proper release for the image.  [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 02:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

533398 +++$+++ Winjammer +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-21 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.224600420E09 +++$+++ Please restore the [[Anti-clich\xe9]] page.  It deserves to be on wikipedia.  I disagree with its deletion.  Ironically, you can't even find it in any web-dictionary.  Anti-cliche is a neologism that is a literary device which exists in the transgression and subversion of language norms.  If we delete this page then we by the same logic must delete [[trope]], [[slang]], [[neologism]], and many many many others.  In its state (before it was deleted) it may have been a 'stub', but it certainly deserves inclusion in the wikipedia. +++$+++ Please restore the [[Anti-cliché]] page.  It deserves to be on wikipedia.  I disagree with its deletion.  Ironically, you can't even find it in any web-dictionary.  Anti-cliche is a neologism that is a literary device which exists in the transgression and subversion of language norms.  If we delete this page then we by the same logic must delete [[trope]], [[slang]], [[neologism]], and many many many others.  In its state (before it was deleted) it may have been a 'stub', but it certainly deserves inclusion in the wikipedia.[[User:Winjammer|Winjammer]] ([[User talk:Winjammer|talk]]) 07:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
533399 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533398 +++$+++ 533398 +++$+++ 2008-10-21 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.224606840E09 +++$+++ Done. But it is still unreferenced, one may want to fix that... Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Done. But it is still unreferenced, one may want to fix that... Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:34, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

602607 +++$+++  +++$+++ Lord Hawk +++$+++ 602607 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-31 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.154390160E09 +++$+++ Oh. Sorry. I removed it because it did not exist and I don't like having dead links that are never worked on. If you want it linked, it should have a dedicated page.  +++$+++ Oh. Sorry. I removed it because it did not exist and I don't like having dead links that are never worked on. If you want it linked, it should have a dedicated page. [[User:Lord Hawk]] 16:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
602608 +++$+++ Palpalpalpal +++$+++ Lord Hawk +++$+++ 602607 +++$+++ 602607 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.154400120E09 +++$+++ For me, the link is an invitation for others to create the page. As dead links are marked in red they cannot be an inconvenience: you know what you get before clicking. Well, anyway, I guess I could create the page.  +++$+++ :For me, the link is an invitation for others to create the page. As dead links are marked in red they cannot be an inconvenience: you know what you get before clicking. Well, anyway, I guess I could create the page. [[User:Palpalpalpal|Palpalpalpal]] 19:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

9112 +++$+++ Mtking +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-06 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312623900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for blocking this user, would you consider revdel'ing all his edits ?  +++$+++ Thanks for blocking this user, would you consider revdel'ing all his edits ? [[User:Mtking|<span style="color:Green;text-shadow:lightgreen 0.110em 0.110em 0.110em;">Mt</span>]][[User talk:Mtking|<span style="color:gold;">king</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Mtking|<font color="gold"> (edits) </font>]]</sup> 02:45, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
9113 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9112 +++$+++ 9112 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312624200E09 +++$+++ Done & done  +++$+++ :Done & done [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 02:50, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
9114 +++$+++ Mtking +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ 9112 +++$+++ 9113 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.312624260E09 +++$+++ Thanks, don't think he (or she) can take the hit.  +++$+++ :: Thanks, don't think he (or she) can take the hit. [[User:Mtking|<span style="color:Green;text-shadow:lightgreen 0.110em 0.110em 0.110em;">Mt</span>]][[User talk:Mtking|<span style="color:gold;">king</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Mtking|<font color="gold"> (edits) </font>]]</sup> 02:51, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

533401 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-25 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.224952320E09 +++$+++ Candidly   +++$+++ Candidly  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 09:32, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
533402 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533401 +++$+++ 533401 +++$+++ 2008-10-25 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.224953460E09 +++$+++ Hi. Indeed, contested prods usually get reverted and sent to afd. I have done so. The whole history of the article is preserved so you can check the previous edits. I hope it helps. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Indeed, contested prods usually get reverted and sent to afd. I have done so. The whole history of the article is preserved so you can check the previous edits. I hope it helps. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
533403 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533401 +++$+++ 533402 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.225101960E09 +++$+++ Candidly,  +++$+++ ::Candidly, [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 03:06, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
533404 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533401 +++$+++ 533403 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 07:31:00 +++$+++ 1.225117860E09 +++$+++ Hi. You are probably right, going through afd is somehow hard. Ok, I will close the afd and userfy the content of the article. Then you decide what's the next step. I hope you have no hard feelings about my previous action, I thought that was a reasonable thing to do. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ ::: Hi. You are probably right, going through afd is somehow hard. Ok, I will close the afd and userfy the content of the article. Then you decide what's the next step. I hope you have no hard feelings about my previous action, I thought that was a reasonable thing to do. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
533405 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533401 +++$+++ 533404 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.225144680E09 +++$+++ Ok.  Thanks.  All's well that ends well.  Cheers   +++$+++ ::::Ok.  Thanks.  All's well that ends well.  Cheers  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 14:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
533406 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533401 +++$+++ 533401 +++$+++ 2008-10-25 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.224957600E09 +++$+++ Hi. The reason for deletion, as the nominator stated, was ''primary-source only, film not filming, questionable notability''. There is a more detailed guideline about future films, see [[WP:NFF]]. So I suggest you wait until the film is released. I hope this helps. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The reason for deletion, as the nominator stated, was ''primary-source only, film not filming, questionable notability''. There is a more detailed guideline about future films, see [[WP:NFF]]. So I suggest you wait until the film is released. I hope this helps. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:00, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

9116 +++$+++ CMummert +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-25 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.169727780E09 +++$+++ If you are interested in fixing the article, please feel free (nobody else has stepped up, and I am putting it off). There is already some discussion on the talk page in the section '''Definition'''. I'm writing because minor changes you make might get lost if and when the article is rewritten, and that would be a waste of your time.  +++$+++ If you are interested in fixing the article, please feel free (nobody else has stepped up, and I am putting it off). There is already some discussion on the talk page in the section '''Definition'''. I'm writing because minor changes you make might get lost if and when the article is rewritten, and that would be a waste of your time. [[User:CMummert|CMummert]] · <small>[[User talk:CMummert|talk]]</small> 04:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
9117 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9116 +++$+++ 9116 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.169736420E09 +++$+++ Oh, wow, good point. Thanks for the heads-up. :-) \u2014 +++$+++ :Oh, wow, good point. Thanks for the heads-up. :-) —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 06:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

271261 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271261 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-01 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.257145620E09 +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, would you be interested in looking at ''[[Not One Less]]'' if you have free time and commenting on [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Not One Less\/archive1]]? It's been at FAC for almost two weeks and I haven't gotten any comments or criticism yet, even after messaging a few movie-ish people. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, would you be interested in looking at ''[[Not One Less]]'' if you have free time and commenting on [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Not One Less/archive1]]? It's been at FAC for almost two weeks and I haven't gotten any comments or criticism yet, even after messaging a few movie-ish people. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 23:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
271262 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271261 +++$+++ 271261 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.257550080E09 +++$+++ Added my two cents. Very nice article.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Added my two cents. Very nice article.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:28, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

9119 +++$+++ Jr mints +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9119 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-28 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.169979720E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Jr mints|Jr mints]] 02:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
9120 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9119 +++$+++ 9119 +++$+++ 2007-01-28 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.169980860E09 +++$+++ There is no need to apologize; your comments are quite welcome, both here and at [[Talk:Defective verb]]. I'm sorry if I gave the impression I minded. :-\/ \u2014 +++$+++ :There is no need to apologize; your comments are quite welcome, both here and at [[Talk:Defective verb]]. I'm sorry if I gave the impression I minded. :-/ —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 02:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

271264 +++$+++ Polargeo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-03 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.257298260E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. Just noticed you have added a picture to [[West Antarctica]] and [[Amundsen Sea]]. It is a nice picture but I'm not sure it adds much to these articles. Also technically the caption is incorrect because it is an [[iceberg]] and not [[sea ice]]. thanks  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. Just noticed you have added a picture to [[West Antarctica]] and [[Amundsen Sea]]. It is a nice picture but I'm not sure it adds much to these articles. Also technically the caption is incorrect because it is an [[iceberg]] and not [[sea ice]]. thanks [[User:Polargeo|Polargeo]] ([[User talk:Polargeo|talk]]) 17:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
271265 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271264 +++$+++ 271264 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.257298500E09 +++$+++ Sorry, you are right, it is an iceberg.  There are no pictures in either article that give the sense there is actually ocean. However, you are free to remove the image if you do not like it. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Sorry, you are right, it is an iceberg.  There are no pictures in either article that give the sense there is actually ocean. However, you are free to remove the image if you do not like it. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
271266 +++$+++ Polargeo +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271264 +++$+++ 271265 +++$+++ 2009-11-04 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.257356100E09 +++$+++ There is so little in the articles that I think they can take a nice picture and it does give more of a sense of the place. A bit of [[WP:WikiFairy]]ing here and there is a good thing.  +++$+++ ::There is so little in the articles that I think they can take a nice picture and it does give more of a sense of the place. A bit of [[WP:WikiFairy]]ing here and there is a good thing. [[User:Polargeo|Polargeo]] ([[User talk:Polargeo|talk]]) 09:35, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

9121 +++$+++ Selket +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9121 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-29 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.170089640E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Selket|Selket]] 08:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
9122 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9121 +++$+++ 9121 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 09:07:00 +++$+++ 1.170090420E09 +++$+++ Yeah, don't worry, I'm watching that page. :-) \u2014 +++$+++ :Yeah, don't worry, I'm watching that page. :-) —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 09:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

9123 +++$+++ Twas Now +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9123 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-02 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.170404460E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you could change [[restrictiveness]] so a preposition it does not end with (so it does not end with a preposition). Also, what happens if John has more than one wife? Then ''beautiful'' might be restrictive if his other wives are ugly, or even average in appearance. As the article stands now, there is a [[systemic bias]] in favour of monogamist societies. \u2212  +++$+++ Perhaps you could change [[restrictiveness]] so a preposition it does not end with (so it does not end with a preposition). Also, what happens if John has more than one wife? Then ''beautiful'' might be restrictive if his other wives are ugly, or even average in appearance. As the article stands now, there is a [[systemic bias]] in favour of monogamist societies. − [[User:Twas Now|'''Twas ''Now''''']] <small>( [[User talk:Twas Now|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Twas Now|contribs]] • [[Special:Emailuser/Twas Now|e-mail]] )</small> 00:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
9124 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9123 +++$+++ 9123 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.170407160E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ :—[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 01:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

271268 +++$+++ TenPoundHammer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-06 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.257506820E09 +++$+++ Saw your question re: the sources in this article. We've been discussing this again, take a look. <span style=\"color:green\">Ten Pound Hammer<\/span>, his otters and a clue-bat \u2022 <sup>([[Special:Contributions\/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] \u2022 [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] \u2022  +++$+++ Saw your question re: the sources in this article. We've been discussing this again, take a look. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 03:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
271269 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271268 +++$+++ 271268 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.257549960E09 +++$+++ Commented at [[Talk:Xanadu Houses]]. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Commented at [[Talk:Xanadu Houses]]. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:26, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
271270 +++$+++ TenPoundHammer +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271268 +++$+++ 271269 +++$+++ 2009-11-06 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.257556140E09 +++$+++ Very good argument. <span style=\"color:green\">Ten Pound Hammer<\/span>, his otters and a clue-bat \u2022 <sup>([[Special:Contributions\/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] \u2022 [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] \u2022  +++$+++ ::Very good argument. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 17:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

9125 +++$+++ Gracchus babeuf +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9125 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.172492760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Gracchus babeuf|Gracchus babeuf]] 04:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
9126 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9125 +++$+++ 9125 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.172502480E09 +++$+++ I completely agree about the meaning of the French construction, but disagree that ''have it done'' is an appropriate translation; it's almost coincidental that it has a similar meaning to ''have done it''. (\"Have it done by tomorrow\" means \"cause it to be complete by tomorrow\", while \"have done it by tomorrow\" means \"do it before tomorrow\". It's like how \"I have my homework done\" and \"I have done my homework\" have similar meanings, but are completely different constructions.) \u2014 +++$+++ :I completely agree about the meaning of the French construction, but disagree that ''have it done'' is an appropriate translation; it's almost coincidental that it has a similar meaning to ''have done it''. ("Have it done by tomorrow" means "cause it to be complete by tomorrow", while "have done it by tomorrow" means "do it before tomorrow". It's like how "I have my homework done" and "I have done my homework" have similar meanings, but are completely different constructions.) —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 07:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

9127 +++$+++ Gracchus babeuf +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.172546280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Gracchus babeuf|Gracchus babeuf]] 19:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
9128 +++$+++ CovenantD +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9127 +++$+++ 9127 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.172541900E09 +++$+++ I don't consider attempting to increase the accuracy of a sentence to be \"messing\" with it and don't appreciate the implication.  +++$+++ * I don't consider attempting to increase the accuracy of a sentence to be "messing" with it and don't appreciate the implication. [[User:CovenantD|CovenantD]] 18:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
9129 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9127 +++$+++ 9128 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.172543640E09 +++$+++ :Well, then, please read full sentences before attempting to increase their accuracy! You did increase its accuracy in some regards, but you took a sentence that was perfectly sensible (but with some inaccuracies) and replaced it with one that did not make sense (since the \"as\" phrase no longer connected to any part of the sentence) and that \u2014 insofar as it could be interpreted sensibly \u2014 said ''the exact opposite of what was meant'' (since it made it sound like Norvell described Smith's comments as \"politically correct nuttiness\", when in fact he described ''criticism'' of Smith's comments as \"politically correct nuttiness\"). \u2014 +++$+++ *:Well, then, please read full sentences before attempting to increase their accuracy! You did increase its accuracy in some regards, but you took a sentence that was perfectly sensible (but with some inaccuracies) and replaced it with one that did not make sense (since the "as" phrase no longer connected to any part of the sentence) and that — insofar as it could be interpreted sensibly — said ''the exact opposite of what was meant'' (since it made it sound like Norvell described Smith's comments as "politically correct nuttiness", when in fact he described ''criticism'' of Smith's comments as "politically correct nuttiness"). —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 18:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

271273 +++$+++ Ian mckenzie +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271273 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-07 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.257660960E09 +++$+++ I see you reposted that photo under [[Glacier cave]] as recommended.  But the caption was still wrong, so I have corrected that - which is tricky, because the erroneous term is also embedded within the file name, and I see that it is not your photo.  +++$+++ I see you reposted that photo under [[Glacier cave]] as recommended.  But the caption was still wrong, so I have corrected that - which is tricky, because the erroneous term is also embedded within the file name, and I see that it is not your photo. [[User:Ian mckenzie|Ian mckenzie]] ([[User talk:Ian mckenzie|talk]]) 22:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
271274 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271273 +++$+++ 271273 +++$+++ 2009-11-07 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.257662460E09 +++$+++ It is a NOAA photo and I got the title from the NOAA site.[http:\/\/www.photolib.noaa.gov\/htmls\/corp1964.htm] \u2014 +++$+++ :It is a NOAA photo and I got the title from the NOAA site.[http://www.photolib.noaa.gov/htmls/corp1964.htm] —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:41, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

9130 +++$+++ Saurabhb +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-27 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.172621760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Saurabhb|Saurabhb]] 16:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
9131 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9130 +++$+++ 9130 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.172624400E09 +++$+++ I'm really not O.K. with an \"explanation\" that doesn't actually explain the problem; but, I've rewritten the section to explain the paradox without using the word \"set\". Is this acceptable? \u2014 +++$+++ :I'm really not O.K. with an "explanation" that doesn't actually explain the problem; but, I've rewritten the section to explain the paradox without using the word "set". Is this acceptable? —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 17:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

271275 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-07 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.257642840E09 +++$+++ |}  +++$+++ |} [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 17:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
271276 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271275 +++$+++ 271275 +++$+++ 2009-11-07 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.257655260E09 +++$+++ Thank you for notifying me. I am  happy to wait and see if the revert holds before any retagging of unsourced material.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ : Thank you for notifying me. I am  happy to wait and see if the revert holds before any retagging of unsourced material.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:41, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
271277 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271275 +++$+++ 271276 +++$+++ 2009-11-07 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.257655620E09 +++$+++ OK, I'll probably give it until mid- to late next week to decide whether to work on recovering anything of value lost in the revert.  Regards,  +++$+++ :: OK, I'll probably give it until mid- to late next week to decide whether to work on recovering anything of value lost in the revert.  Regards, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

9132 +++$+++ Qe2eqe +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-28 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.177820220E09 +++$+++ I can describe infinity in under ten words (7). Also, it says: \"I can do what I can do, plus one\". There are better paradoxes to muddle ourselves in. +++$+++ I can describe infinity in under ten words (7). Also, it says: "I can do what I can do, plus one". There are better paradoxes to muddle ourselves in.[[User:Qe2eqe|Qe2eqe]] 21:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
9133 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9132 +++$+++ 9132 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.173187140E09 +++$+++ No worries, just wanted to make sure. :-) \u2014 +++$+++ :No worries, just wanted to make sure. :-) —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 05:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

394738 +++$+++ Erikeltic +++$+++ DeltaQuad +++$+++ 394738 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.312414680E09 +++$+++ When an editor is discovered to be a indef blocked sockpuppet (like Placebo, who you just blocked) what happens to the discussion he\/she started on various talk pages?  Should their comments be allowed to stand and are those sockpuppet comments given any weight whatsoever?  Specifically, I'm referring to the discussion at [[Sondra Locke]].  Thanks for any info you can provide.   +++$+++ When an editor is discovered to be a indef blocked sockpuppet (like Placebo, who you just blocked) what happens to the discussion he/she started on various talk pages?  Should their comments be allowed to stand and are those sockpuppet comments given any weight whatsoever?  Specifically, I'm referring to the discussion at [[Sondra Locke]].  Thanks for any info you can provide.  [[User:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#E00C0C"><B>Erikeltic</B>]]</span> <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:Erikeltic|<span style="color:#E00C0C">Talk]]</span>)</span></sup> 16:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
394739 +++$+++ DeltaQuad +++$+++ DeltaQuad +++$+++ 394738 +++$+++ 394738 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312417260E09 +++$+++ Usually the discussion just goes cold so we have the evidence later, and that we don't remove talkpage comments by legitimate users. You can take the socks comments at face value, just never use it in forming consensus. --  +++$+++ :Usually the discussion just goes cold so we have the evidence later, and that we don't remove talkpage comments by legitimate users. You can take the socks comments at face value, just never use it in forming consensus. -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<font color="green">DQ]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<font color="red"> (t) ]] <font color="blue">[[Special:EmailUser/DeltaQuad| (e)]]</font></font></font> 17:21, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

533422 +++$+++ Dhatfield +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-28 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.225259100E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone, can you please point me towards the log of the deletion discussion for this article? I cannot seem to find it anywhere and I've followed every lead I can think of (PROD archives, page links and your contributions). It's as though it just vanished. Thanks  +++$+++ Hi Tone, can you please point me towards the log of the deletion discussion for this article? I cannot seem to find it anywhere and I've followed every lead I can think of (PROD archives, page links and your contributions). It's as though it just vanished. Thanks [[User:Dhatfield|Dhatfield]] ([[User talk:Dhatfield|talk]]) 22:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
533423 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533422 +++$+++ 533422 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.225259820E09 +++$+++ Hi. The articles that get deleted in a prod process are not archived anywhere. They are just tagged (in this case ''essayish with too much original research'') and deleted in 5 days if there are no objections. Would you like me to recreate it? Then, we can still send it through the afd process. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The articles that get deleted in a prod process are not archived anywhere. They are just tagged (in this case ''essayish with too much original research'') and deleted in 5 days if there are no objections. Would you like me to recreate it? Then, we can still send it through the afd process. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
533424 +++$+++ Dhatfield +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533422 +++$+++ 533423 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.225313400E09 +++$+++ Hi, would you please restore the article so that I can move to a sandbox, replace with a stub (until the article is ready) and address the objections to style and originality? It's a valuable addition to the [[Tank]] article cluster and if I remember correctly it has ''some'' useful content which is hard to come by when discussing classified military technology. Thanks.  +++$+++ :: Hi, would you please restore the article so that I can move to a sandbox, replace with a stub (until the article is ready) and address the objections to style and originality? It's a valuable addition to the [[Tank]] article cluster and if I remember correctly it has ''some'' useful content which is hard to come by when discussing classified military technology. Thanks. [[User:Dhatfield|Dhatfield]] ([[User talk:Dhatfield|talk]]) 13:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
533425 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533422 +++$+++ 533424 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.225314900E09 +++$+++ Restored. Have a look what can be done. Good luck. --''' +++$+++ ::: Restored. Have a look what can be done. Good luck. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

271280 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-09 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.257799440E09 +++$+++ I got it passed at GAN, next step is a peer review.  As I only just finished writing the darn thing, there is still some sawdust and debris around that could use your help to deal with.  I intend to take it to FAC perhaps by the end of the month, no doubt Fifelfoo won't like it but I can't help that.  There are probably more bios on this guy than any other prime minister, except Churchill.-- +++$+++ I got it passed at GAN, next step is a peer review.  As I only just finished writing the darn thing, there is still some sawdust and debris around that could use your help to deal with.  I intend to take it to FAC perhaps by the end of the month, no doubt Fifelfoo won't like it but I can't help that.  There are probably more bios on this guy than any other prime minister, except Churchill.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 12:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
271281 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271280 +++$+++ 271280 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.257838920E09 +++$+++ Perhaps when it is done with peer review. I am no longer keen on copy editing for FAC, but will consider \"you\"! Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Perhaps when it is done with peer review. I am no longer keen on copy editing for FAC, but will consider "you"! Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:42, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
271282 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271280 +++$+++ 271281 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.257840240E09 +++$+++ Probably wise (and thank you).  There are rumblings that the article is a bit long.  We'll see what is left when it comes out of PR.  It's all how you look at things.  Chamberlain was not particularly distinguished as PM, but his tenure was notorious and so he is a subject of intense interest.  Note that the GA nomination got snatched from the bottom of the list.  [[Henry Campbell-Bannerman]], he's not.-- +++$+++ ::Probably wise (and thank you).  There are rumblings that the article is a bit long.  We'll see what is left when it comes out of PR.  It's all how you look at things.  Chamberlain was not particularly distinguished as PM, but his tenure was notorious and so he is a subject of intense interest.  Note that the GA nomination got snatched from the bottom of the list.  [[Henry Campbell-Bannerman]], he's not.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:04, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
271283 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271280 +++$+++ 271282 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.257840480E09 +++$+++ And Nixon, Khrushchev, Chamberlain have something in common.  They all reached the top, and then fell precipitously.  Having had one or two life experiences like that, I guess I feel sympathy.-- +++$+++ :::And Nixon, Khrushchev, Chamberlain have something in common.  They all reached the top, and then fell precipitously.  Having had one or two life experiences like that, I guess I feel sympathy.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
271284 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271280 +++$+++ 271283 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.257840600E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm just sick of all the editors talking about \"my articles\". I am thinking that FAC encourages an unhealthy attitude on Wikipedia that some editors are better than others because they collect trophies. I am feeling unwilling to contribute to all of that. Copy editing is low man on the totem pole. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::Yeah, I'm just sick of all the editors talking about "my articles". I am thinking that FAC encourages an unhealthy attitude on Wikipedia that some editors are better than others because they collect trophies. I am feeling unwilling to contribute to all of that. Copy editing is low man on the totem pole. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
271285 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271280 +++$+++ 271284 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.257840720E09 +++$+++ If you hunt down the wild beast at considerable risk to yourself, you are darn well entitled to display the head on a plaque in the den!-- +++$+++ :::::If you hunt down the wild beast at considerable risk to yourself, you are darn well entitled to display the head on a plaque in the den!--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 00:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
271286 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271280 +++$+++ 271285 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.257841020E09 +++$+++ It doesn't work that way. People consider [[WP:FAN]] the \"truth\". I'm taking my toys and going home. Not willing to play anymore!  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::::It doesn't work that way. People consider [[WP:FAN]] the "truth". I'm taking my toys and going home. Not willing to play anymore!  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:17, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

9137 +++$+++ User:JeffGent +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-08 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.176091080E09 +++$+++ Hi, you wrote in your edit summary to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Expletive_deleted&diff=116028037&oldid=116009058 this edit] \"rv: there was a decision to merge these articles. you can't just ignore that decision; you have to convince people otherwise.\"  Can you please point me to that decision?  I am having trouble finding it.  Thanks!  &nbsp; \u2014  +++$+++ Hi, you wrote in your edit summary to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Expletive_deleted&diff=116028037&oldid=116009058 this edit] "rv: there was a decision to merge these articles. you can't just ignore that decision; you have to convince people otherwise."  Can you please point me to that decision?  I am having trouble finding it.  Thanks!  &nbsp; — [[User:JeffGent|Jeff G.]] <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">([[User talk:JeffGent|talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/User:JeffGent|contribs]])</span> 20:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
9138 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9137 +++$+++ 9137 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.176093960E09 +++$+++ [[Talk:Expletive deleted]], http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Expletive_deleted&action=history, http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Expletive&action=history. There wasn't too much discussion, but one person proposed the merge by posting a comment, a different person proposed it by adding a merge template, yet another person actually performed the merge, and a number of people saw the various proposals without objecting. It doesn't seem like too many people cared very much \u2014 but if you wanted to object, you had your chance. This being Wikipedia, there's no end of new chances, but to reverse a previous decision, you really have to start a new discussion. Who knows, maybe no one will care enough to argue, and you'll be able to go ahead with it. :-) \u2014 +++$+++ :[[Talk:Expletive deleted]], http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Expletive_deleted&action=history, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Expletive&action=history. There wasn't too much discussion, but one person proposed the merge by posting a comment, a different person proposed it by adding a merge template, yet another person actually performed the merge, and a number of people saw the various proposals without objecting. It doesn't seem like too many people cared very much — but if you wanted to object, you had your chance. This being Wikipedia, there's no end of new chances, but to reverse a previous decision, you really have to start a new discussion. Who knows, maybe no one will care enough to argue, and you'll be able to go ahead with it. :-) —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 21:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

533426 +++$+++ Michael Reschke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-28 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.225260840E09 +++$+++ Could you restore please? Now there's an article in the German Wikipedia. Thx, your -- +++$+++ Could you restore please? Now there's an article in the German Wikipedia. Thx, your --[[User:Michael Reschke|Michael Reschke]] ([[User talk:Michael Reschke|talk]]) 23:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
533427 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533426 +++$+++ 533426 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.225261440E09 +++$+++ Done. However, it has no references or other assertion of notability. So you should fix that, otherwise it will get  deleted again. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Done. However, it has no references or other assertion of notability. So you should fix that, otherwise it will get  deleted again. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 23:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
533428 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533426 +++$+++ 533426 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.225301700E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process. Since you object the deletion, I will restore it but you should address the problems because otherwise it can get deleted again. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process. Since you object the deletion, I will restore it but you should address the problems because otherwise it can get deleted again. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

9139 +++$+++ 213.37.6.65 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9139 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.176278100E09 +++$+++ I saw you changed one of the Spanish examples in the [[Polypersonal agreement]] article, arguing that ''\"Spanish clitics are actually *written* as separate words when they appear before the verb\"''. Just to clarify, I'm a Spaniard and while it's true that in modern speech the usual is to say ''se lo dio'' for \"he\/she gave it to him\/her\/them\", restricting the use of suffixed pronoun clitics to imperative and non-finite forms, it is perfectly possible and grammatical to say ''di\xf3selo''. It merely has a certain archaic\/literary feel to it, because nowadays such forms are commonly found only in literature, particularly in classic works or in modern ones written in an archaicizing or solemn tone (much like the use of \"thou\" in English). In fact, the very form ''di\xf3selo'' is used, for example, in ''Don Quixote'' (in chapter 54) and in translations of the Bible.  +++$+++ I saw you changed one of the Spanish examples in the [[Polypersonal agreement]] article, arguing that ''"Spanish clitics are actually *written* as separate words when they appear before the verb"''. Just to clarify, I'm a Spaniard and while it's true that in modern speech the usual is to say ''se lo dio'' for "he/she gave it to him/her/them", restricting the use of suffixed pronoun clitics to imperative and non-finite forms, it is perfectly possible and grammatical to say ''dióselo''. It merely has a certain archaic/literary feel to it, because nowadays such forms are commonly found only in literature, particularly in classic works or in modern ones written in an archaicizing or solemn tone (much like the use of "thou" in English). In fact, the very form ''dióselo'' is used, for example, in ''Don Quixote'' (in chapter 54) and in translations of the Bible. [[User:213.37.6.65|213.37.6.65]] 00:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
9140 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9139 +++$+++ 9139 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.176278280E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ :—[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 00:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

9141 +++$+++ Hotfeba +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9141 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-12 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.176444300E09 +++$+++ I had no intention of causing anger or frustration among the math gods of the Wikipedia. I thought it was perfectly reasonable to seek clarification on bijection\/cardinality as it applied to practical programming, and I still have no real idea what sort of paradox is introduced by not having bijection (I assume its exclusion causes paradoxical results based on my previous 1-semester study of mathematical logic in school). Thanks to your comments (positive\/supportive) and the other's slap about being incoherent (not so positive\/supportive), I realized that my initial inclusion of \"one-to-one correspondence\" was overkill on finite sets, allowing me to recommend to a client a coding solution with a faster execution time than coding for strict cardinality testing as she had initially inquired about. As someone who has spent a lifetime tutoring students - especially math students - who were in over their heads, I have always been leery of defining groups of people with less education or experience than myself as \"trolls\", and I am warning students in general that making a serious query on any Wikipedia math article discussion page is liable to produce damage to their self-esteem and discouragement of further study.  +++$+++ I had no intention of causing anger or frustration among the math gods of the Wikipedia. I thought it was perfectly reasonable to seek clarification on bijection/cardinality as it applied to practical programming, and I still have no real idea what sort of paradox is introduced by not having bijection (I assume its exclusion causes paradoxical results based on my previous 1-semester study of mathematical logic in school). Thanks to your comments (positive/supportive) and the other's slap about being incoherent (not so positive/supportive), I realized that my initial inclusion of "one-to-one correspondence" was overkill on finite sets, allowing me to recommend to a client a coding solution with a faster execution time than coding for strict cardinality testing as she had initially inquired about. As someone who has spent a lifetime tutoring students - especially math students - who were in over their heads, I have always been leery of defining groups of people with less education or experience than myself as "trolls", and I am warning students in general that making a serious query on any Wikipedia math article discussion page is liable to produce damage to their self-esteem and discouragement of further study. [[User:Hotfeba|Hotfeba]] 23:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
9142 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9141 +++$+++ 9141 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.176457860E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ :—[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 02:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
9143 +++$+++ Hotfeba +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9141 +++$+++ 9142 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.176466200E09 +++$+++ For a person to emit a condescending comment such as \"Don't feed the troll\", one must first think it, and then one must believe it to be correct or believe it to be damaging, or both. To emit such a comment in the role of administrator ''after'' other persons have apparently agreed a topic had been clarified and settled is especially noteworthy for being predjudicial yet at the same time petty. Having just finished reading [[WP:NOFEEDING]] and not being completely clueless of the [http:\/\/www.shyness.com\/encyclopedia.html#II guard\/prisoner role-play studies] done in one psych department basement, I am a little bit more literate today about staying here than I was yesterday, and now I understand my place, sir. I go now. Time to talk and advise the others.  +++$+++ ::For a person to emit a condescending comment such as "Don't feed the troll", one must first think it, and then one must believe it to be correct or believe it to be damaging, or both. To emit such a comment in the role of administrator ''after'' other persons have apparently agreed a topic had been clarified and settled is especially noteworthy for being predjudicial yet at the same time petty. Having just finished reading [[WP:NOFEEDING]] and not being completely clueless of the [http://www.shyness.com/encyclopedia.html#II guard/prisoner role-play studies] done in one psych department basement, I am a little bit more literate today about staying here than I was yesterday, and now I understand my place, sir. I go now. Time to talk and advise the others. [[User:Hotfeba|Hotfeba]] 05:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
9144 +++$+++ Hotfeba +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9141 +++$+++ 9143 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.176624720E09 +++$+++ I am touched that he took time to analyze the intellectual dishonesty, confusion, and\/or stupidity he alleges of me, clearly all violations on his part of [[WP:CIVIL]]. I am not going to take the bait on the math talk page. Instead, I have a way of dealing with this through the law as it applies to the Internet within my state's jurisdiction and to the creation of new law in response to new situations.  +++$+++ :::I am touched that he took time to analyze the intellectual dishonesty, confusion, and/or stupidity he alleges of me, clearly all violations on his part of [[WP:CIVIL]]. I am not going to take the bait on the math talk page. Instead, I have a way of dealing with this through the law as it applies to the Internet within my state's jurisdiction and to the creation of new law in response to new situations. [[User:Hotfeba|Hotfeba]] 01:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
9145 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9141 +++$+++ 9141 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.177030020E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ :—[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 17:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

271287 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-09 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.257838320E09 +++$+++ I'm sure [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Flatworm&action=historysubmit&diff=324922016&oldid=324917000 this] was an unintended side-effect of your trying out to clear out previous vandalism :-) -- +++$+++ I'm sure [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flatworm&action=historysubmit&diff=324922016&oldid=324917000 this] was an unintended side-effect of your trying out to clear out previous vandalism :-) --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 23:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
271288 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271287 +++$+++ 271287 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.257838800E09 +++$+++ Yes, I did a \"restore\" as I was not clear if it should be strictly considered a \"vandal\", having been reprimanded for doing a \"vandal\" when it could have been a \"good faith\" newbie. Sorry about that. I should have checked more thoroughly. Next time I wouldn't be so quick to intervene, although I do keep an eye on that article, like many of my prior GANs. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Yes, I did a "restore" as I was not clear if it should be strictly considered a "vandal", having been reprimanded for doing a "vandal" when it could have been a "good faith" newbie. Sorry about that. I should have checked more thoroughly. Next time I wouldn't be so quick to intervene, although I do keep an eye on that article, like many of my prior GANs. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

271289 +++$+++ Manning Bartlett +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-10 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.257853860E09 +++$+++ For the Arbitration Committee,  +++$+++ For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Manning Bartlett|Manning]] ([[User talk:Manning Bartlett|talk]]) 03:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
271290 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271289 +++$+++ 271289 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 08:45:00 +++$+++ 1.257957900E09 +++$+++ You have reacted under stress and posted [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification&diff=325121469&oldid=325117176 an inappropriate and unhelpful comment]. You did not consult with me. This is against proposal 2: \"Mattisse to not post in anger or frustration anywhere on Wikipedia without having first consulted her mentors\/advisors.\" Some observations on the [[User:SilkTork\/Report#Final_Report|Report]] were that you would not be able to comply with that proposal. I felt that you would. I am willing to assist you Mattisse - but I am not willing to simply wag my finger at you after you have done silly things. Either you take this situation seriously and commit to consulting with someone when you feel stressed, or I can no longer agree to help you. Be aware that if I read a posting by you that contains a negative comment on another Wikipedia editor I will block you for 24 hours. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :You have reacted under stress and posted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification&diff=325121469&oldid=325117176 an inappropriate and unhelpful comment]. You did not consult with me. This is against proposal 2: "Mattisse to not post in anger or frustration anywhere on Wikipedia without having first consulted her mentors/advisors." Some observations on the [[User:SilkTork/Report#Final_Report|Report]] were that you would not be able to comply with that proposal. I felt that you would. I am willing to assist you Mattisse - but I am not willing to simply wag my finger at you after you have done silly things. Either you take this situation seriously and commit to consulting with someone when you feel stressed, or I can no longer agree to help you. Be aware that if I read a posting by you that contains a negative comment on another Wikipedia editor I will block you for 24 hours. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 08:45, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
271291 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271289 +++$+++ 271290 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.257963840E09 +++$+++ Regretfully I have to agreed with SilkTork. I emailed you early on 10 Nov, finishing with \"So keep calm, avoid controversy, think before saving and use your mentors\" - but a few hours later you posted [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification&diff=325121469&oldid=325117176 your inappropriate and unhelpful comment]. As SilkTork said, \"Mattisse to not post in anger or frustration anywhere on Wikipedia without having first consulted her mentors\/advisors.\" I've described (several types) editors and types of situation you should avoid until you get advice ''first''. If you can't recognise the signs of stress that lead to mistakes, or if you won't wait for advice from your mentors, you will keep getting into the same types of trouble, and the result will a very long block or a very restrictive ban or both. If you can't control your impulses, the block SilkTork suggested may be the only way to make you take time to think. -- +++$+++ ::Regretfully I have to agreed with SilkTork. I emailed you early on 10 Nov, finishing with "So keep calm, avoid controversy, think before saving and use your mentors" - but a few hours later you posted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification&diff=325121469&oldid=325117176 your inappropriate and unhelpful comment]. As SilkTork said, "Mattisse to not post in anger or frustration anywhere on Wikipedia without having first consulted her mentors/advisors." I've described (several types) editors and types of situation you should avoid until you get advice ''first''. If you can't recognise the signs of stress that lead to mistakes, or if you won't wait for advice from your mentors, you will keep getting into the same types of trouble, and the result will a very long block or a very restrictive ban or both. If you can't control your impulses, the block SilkTork suggested may be the only way to make you take time to think. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 10:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
271292 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271289 +++$+++ 271291 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.257987660E09 +++$+++ I concur, and this incident is a perfect illustration of one of the reasons: over an imperfect communication medium like this, misunderstandings arise very easily. Even small misperceptions can grow into long-lasting disputes. Consequently, being hasty to respond and hasty to assume anything other than good faith is not a good idea. As in life, when things seem out of place on Wikipedia, it is much better to assume \"cock-up\" in preference to \"conspiracy\" (and preferably assume neither). '' +++$+++ :::I concur, and this incident is a perfect illustration of one of the reasons: over an imperfect communication medium like this, misunderstandings arise very easily. Even small misperceptions can grow into long-lasting disputes. Consequently, being hasty to respond and hasty to assume anything other than good faith is not a good idea. As in life, when things seem out of place on Wikipedia, it is much better to assume "cock-up" in preference to "conspiracy" (and preferably assume neither). ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 17:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
271293 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271289 +++$+++ 271292 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.257987840E09 +++$+++ I sincerely apologize to all of you for my unfortunate post of yesterday, and the resulting confusion.  Posting while I'm crying over my dog with cancer is no excuse.   +++$+++ :::: I sincerely apologize to all of you for my unfortunate post of yesterday, and the resulting confusion.  Posting while I'm crying over my dog with cancer is no excuse.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

9146 +++$+++ Otheus +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-20 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.177090800E09 +++$+++ In my talk message [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ADisputes_in_English_grammar&diff=123844501&oldid=122327898 here], I asked for feedback, not reverts. I'm sure you put a lot of original research into this section, but it was very unclear and unwieldy. Your use of the term \"arguments\" is ambiguous. It could mean \"argument\" as in logic and argumentation, or it could mean \"disputes\" or \"disagreement\". I don't think it was meant as the former, or if it was, ''most'' of the examples do not amount to examples of arguments. They are examples of what causes disagreement. Please discuss on talk before reverting.  +++$+++ In my talk message [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ADisputes_in_English_grammar&diff=123844501&oldid=122327898 here], I asked for feedback, not reverts. I'm sure you put a lot of original research into this section, but it was very unclear and unwieldy. Your use of the term "arguments" is ambiguous. It could mean "argument" as in logic and argumentation, or it could mean "disputes" or "disagreement". I don't think it was meant as the former, or if it was, ''most'' of the examples do not amount to examples of arguments. They are examples of what causes disagreement. Please discuss on talk before reverting. [[User:Otheus|Otheus]] 10:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
9147 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9146 +++$+++ 9146 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.177096080E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ :—[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 12:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
9148 +++$+++ Otheus +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9146 +++$+++ 9147 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.177114500E09 +++$+++ Hi. I intended them to be a cleanup. What I don't understand is how they \"significantly altered the meaning\". I saw you made some subsequent revisions and that these revisions were quite helpful. Thank you. -- +++$+++ ::Hi. I intended them to be a cleanup. What I don't understand is how they "significantly altered the meaning". I saw you made some subsequent revisions and that these revisions were quite helpful. Thank you. --[[User:Otheus|Otheus]] 17:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

533436 +++$+++ Dweller +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-31 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.225478160E09 +++$+++ Why [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3AIn_the_news&diff=248794660&oldid=248793718 cut off your nose to spite your face]? It's a good piece for ITN, just that Wikipedia can't do more than report what it claims; it's POV for us to seem to agree with its findings. -- +++$+++ Why [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AIn_the_news&diff=248794660&oldid=248793718 cut off your nose to spite your face]? It's a good piece for ITN, just that Wikipedia can't do more than report what it claims; it's POV for us to seem to agree with its findings. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 11:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
533437 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533436 +++$+++ 533436 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.225484520E09 +++$+++ I am probably overreacting but I really don't like words like claim in the ITN box. Anyway, if there is a source for ''The Climatic Research Unit is ... a leading institution concerned with the study of natural and anthropogenic climate change.'' I will be fine with it. But, isn't the big institution here [[IPCC]]? Just want to check. --''' +++$+++ : I am probably overreacting but I really don't like words like claim in the ITN box. Anyway, if there is a source for ''The Climatic Research Unit is ... a leading institution concerned with the study of natural and anthropogenic climate change.'' I will be fine with it. But, isn't the big institution here [[IPCC]]? Just want to check. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
533438 +++$+++ Dweller +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533436 +++$+++ 533437 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.225489680E09 +++$+++ No idea re the institution, but surely any report of a scientific report of this nature will ''always'' be a claim, as that's the nature (pun unintended) of science - theories, supported by evidence is as best it can do. -- +++$+++ ::No idea re the institution, but surely any report of a scientific report of this nature will ''always'' be a claim, as that's the nature (pun unintended) of science - theories, supported by evidence is as best it can do. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 14:48, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
533439 +++$+++ Master of Puppets +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533436 +++$+++ 533438 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.225495080E09 +++$+++ I actually agree with Dweller here; we have claims in ITN all the time. Hell, we don't know how many people died in Earthquake A; we only know what news sources claim. What's next? \"Earthquake in Szichuan claimed to have killed 200\"?  +++$+++ :::I actually agree with Dweller here; we have claims in ITN all the time. Hell, we don't know how many people died in Earthquake A; we only know what news sources claim. What's next? "Earthquake in Szichuan claimed to have killed 200"? [[User:Master of Puppets|<span style="color:#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</span>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<sub style="color:#7d7d7d">Call me MoP! :)</sub>]] 16:18, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
533440 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533436 +++$+++ 533439 +++$+++ 2008-10-31 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.225515600E09 +++$+++ I see there is a debate at ITn\/C already, no point in iterating it here. I see I am not the only one who has issues with this post. --''' +++$+++ :::: I see there is a debate at ITn/C already, no point in iterating it here. I see I am not the only one who has issues with this post. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

9149 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-29 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.177872720E09 +++$+++ I thought it was pretty clear. If you cannot prove that it was Nixon's list, then it means that you are drawing your own conclusion of that film's joke. That's original research. Maybe it would have been better if I said \"until\", instead of \"unless\". <span style=\"font-family:Tempus Sans ITC\"> +++$+++ I thought it was pretty clear. If you cannot prove that it was Nixon's list, then it means that you are drawing your own conclusion of that film's joke. That's original research. Maybe it would have been better if I said "until", instead of "unless". <span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC">[[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]</span>  <span style="font-family:Showcard Gothic">[[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]]</span> 11:52, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
9150 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9149 +++$+++ 9149 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.180573320E09 +++$+++ What the heck are you talking about? \u2014 +++$+++ :What the heck are you talking about? —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 18:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

9151 +++$+++ Ynhockey +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9151 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-01 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.180711020E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ -- [[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] <sup>([[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]])</sup> 08:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
9152 +++$+++ Ynhockey +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9151 +++$+++ 9151 +++$+++ 2007-06-01 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.180739280E09 +++$+++ Makes sense if you look at it that way. However, I think each letter (with the possible exception of completely non-disputed ones, like ''mem'', ''nun'', etc.) should be supported by examples (can use well-known Hebrew place names and words) for each possible transliteration. --  +++$+++ :Makes sense if you look at it that way. However, I think each letter (with the possible exception of completely non-disputed ones, like ''mem'', ''nun'', etc.) should be supported by examples (can use well-known Hebrew place names and words) for each possible transliteration. -- [[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] <sup>([[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]])</sup> 16:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

271296 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271296 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-11 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.258003020E09 +++$+++ Your recent comments at the clarification page don't really help anyone, particularly yourself. Maybe you should just turn the computer off for a while, and not try to respond in potentially problematic ways there. I honestly don't think any comments you make there at this point will affect the decision there one way or another, so there really isn't any real point in making them. Just wait for the Arbs to decide whether they will reopen it or not. But saying anything new at this point, particularly without prior consultation, can do nothing but make things worse.  +++$+++ Your recent comments at the clarification page don't really help anyone, particularly yourself. Maybe you should just turn the computer off for a while, and not try to respond in potentially problematic ways there. I honestly don't think any comments you make there at this point will affect the decision there one way or another, so there really isn't any real point in making them. Just wait for the Arbs to decide whether they will reopen it or not. But saying anything new at this point, particularly without prior consultation, can do nothing but make things worse. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 21:17, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
271297 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271296 +++$+++ 271296 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.258003500E09 +++$+++ Seconded. I suggest you self-revert before switching the computer off, Mattisse. --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ *Seconded. I suggest you self-revert before switching the computer off, Mattisse. --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|JN]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 21:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
271298 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271296 +++$+++ 271297 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.258004160E09 +++$+++ That's a good point. Right now, just don't try to add any more fuel to the fire. Threatening to retire, making derogatory comments about Sandy, etc., cannot help anyone. Just revert the potentially problematic edits there and maybe ignore the page until the ArbCom makes a decision one way or another.  +++$+++ **That's a good point. Right now, just don't try to add any more fuel to the fire. Threatening to retire, making derogatory comments about Sandy, etc., cannot help anyone. Just revert the potentially problematic edits there and maybe ignore the page until the ArbCom makes a decision one way or another. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 21:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
271299 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271296 +++$+++ 271298 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.258004580E09 +++$+++ : I concur again. '' +++$+++ **: I concur again. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 21:43, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
271300 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271296 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.258005180E09 +++$+++ : I reverted the last edit. But is reality considered \"derogatory\"? If you look at the total of my edits, compared to those SandyGeorgia chooses to single out, you will see that she presents a distorted picture of the situation. She wants special treatment, and she has delineated the areas that are hers (FAC, FAR, TFA), and I will avoid them. GAN is not one of them. Do you disagree? Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ****: I reverted the last edit. But is reality considered "derogatory"? If you look at the total of my edits, compared to those SandyGeorgia chooses to single out, you will see that she presents a distorted picture of the situation. She wants special treatment, and she has delineated the areas that are hers (FAC, FAR, TFA), and I will avoid them. GAN is not one of them. Do you disagree? Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
271301 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271296 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.258005900E09 +++$+++ :I was specifically thinking of the problematic edit summary, where you referred to \"her\" territory. The phrasing there was very bad. And indicating you would retire after one more DYK didn't in any way help anything. It was situations like this one that the mentors\/advisors were set up for. God knows I'm a bit of a hothead myself, and one of the things I have always been told to do when I start crossing the line is just back off for a while and return later, after giving yourself time to think things over. Even though I rarely if ever do that myself, I know that a lot of my own problems could be alleviated a bit if I did so. Just take a break for a while and, if you feel you must say something there, I would ask you to at least think it over very clearly, to ensure that nothing you say could be interpreted by anyone else as being a problem. Yes, if you want, you could even e-mail me and\/or maybe GG the comments in advance, so that we could make sure that they don't strike anyone as odd. But, remember this is, in effect, a court room. Anything you say can and will be held against you if someone dislikes it. Knowing that, it is always in the best interests of the accused to come off as cool as a cucumber atleast, preferably as cool as ice. Some of your recent comments definitely do not impress as being that.  +++$+++ *****:I was specifically thinking of the problematic edit summary, where you referred to "her" territory. The phrasing there was very bad. And indicating you would retire after one more DYK didn't in any way help anything. It was situations like this one that the mentors/advisors were set up for. God knows I'm a bit of a hothead myself, and one of the things I have always been told to do when I start crossing the line is just back off for a while and return later, after giving yourself time to think things over. Even though I rarely if ever do that myself, I know that a lot of my own problems could be alleviated a bit if I did so. Just take a break for a while and, if you feel you must say something there, I would ask you to at least think it over very clearly, to ensure that nothing you say could be interpreted by anyone else as being a problem. Yes, if you want, you could even e-mail me and/or maybe GG the comments in advance, so that we could make sure that they don't strike anyone as odd. But, remember this is, in effect, a court room. Anything you say can and will be held against you if someone dislikes it. Knowing that, it is always in the best interests of the accused to come off as cool as a cucumber atleast, preferably as cool as ice. Some of your recent comments definitely do not impress as being that. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 22:05, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
271302 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271296 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.258007220E09 +++$+++ :::You can disagree all you want about whether it is fair. However, remember that at this point the person against whom sanctions have been considered is you, not her. If you want to criticize her behavior, than file a separate RfC or let the arbitrators themselves make a decision regarding her actions. But, particularly in your position, the only person whose actions you should be concerned with on that page are your own. You were particularly asked to refrain from commenting on the comments or motivations of others, and yet above you make several comments about her which cannot be seen as being anything other than personal. Two wrongs do not make a right. If the arbitrators think that her conduct is dubious, trust me, they can make sure to let that be known to her. But your sole concern is ensuring that no one takes any offense at your own comments. The most I think it would make any sense for you, in your position, to say would be something like \"I would request that she refrain from making any comments not directly relevant to the main topic of discussion\". But remember, as the person who is, effectively, facing sanctions, her actions aren't your concern -- your own actions are pretty much all you should be concerned with.  +++$+++ *****:::You can disagree all you want about whether it is fair. However, remember that at this point the person against whom sanctions have been considered is you, not her. If you want to criticize her behavior, than file a separate RfC or let the arbitrators themselves make a decision regarding her actions. But, particularly in your position, the only person whose actions you should be concerned with on that page are your own. You were particularly asked to refrain from commenting on the comments or motivations of others, and yet above you make several comments about her which cannot be seen as being anything other than personal. Two wrongs do not make a right. If the arbitrators think that her conduct is dubious, trust me, they can make sure to let that be known to her. But your sole concern is ensuring that no one takes any offense at your own comments. The most I think it would make any sense for you, in your position, to say would be something like "I would request that she refrain from making any comments not directly relevant to the main topic of discussion". But remember, as the person who is, effectively, facing sanctions, her actions aren't your concern -- your own actions are pretty much all you should be concerned with. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 22:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

9154 +++$+++ Wikihermit +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-14 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.181877660E09 +++$+++ I undid your reversion on the article above. I don't know how well you know spanish, but the ending for words that have \"yo\" in front of the verb is \"o\", such as \"yo hablo\" (I talk), \"yo nado\" (I swim), and \"yo bebo\" (I drink). If yo is before the word, the ending is not a. That is for words that have \"he, she or you\" in front, like \"el nada\" (he swims) and \"usted habla\" (you talk). I hope I explained it well enough, since its kind of hard to explain. If you have any questions tell me on my talk page. Thanks! '''<span style=\"font-size:97%\"><font color=\"#33ff00\">''~''<\/font>&nbsp; +++$+++ I undid your reversion on the article above. I don't know how well you know spanish, but the ending for words that have "yo" in front of the verb is "o", such as "yo hablo" (I talk), "yo nado" (I swim), and "yo bebo" (I drink). If yo is before the word, the ending is not a. That is for words that have "he, she or you" in front, like "el nada" (he swims) and "usted habla" (you talk). I hope I explained it well enough, since its kind of hard to explain. If you have any questions tell me on my talk page. Thanks! '''<span style="font-size:97%"><font color="#33ff00">''~''</font>&nbsp;[[User:Wikihermit|<font color="#33ff33">Wi</font><font color="#33ff66">ki</font>]][[User talk:Wikihermit|<font color="#33ff99">her</font><font color="#33ffcc">mit</font>]]</span>''' 20:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
9155 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9154 +++$+++ 9154 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.181881560E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but you're mistaken. Spanish verbs are conjugated not only to agree with their subjects in person and number, but also to indicate their own tense, mood, and aspect. In this case, what you're missing is the mood; those examples are in the subjunctive mood, and ''miento'' is in the indicative. (You can tell it's the subjunctive because later in the line, we have ''que \xe9l mienta'' instead of ''que \xe9l miente''; also, the fact that we're including ''que'' in the conjugations is a big hint, since while there are many conjugation tables that use ''que'' to introduce a subjunctive form, there are none that use it to introduce indicative forms.) I hope that's clear; if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. :-) \u2014 +++$+++ :I'm sorry, but you're mistaken. Spanish verbs are conjugated not only to agree with their subjects in person and number, but also to indicate their own tense, mood, and aspect. In this case, what you're missing is the mood; those examples are in the subjunctive mood, and ''miento'' is in the indicative. (You can tell it's the subjunctive because later in the line, we have ''que él mienta'' instead of ''que él miente''; also, the fact that we're including ''que'' in the conjugations is a big hint, since while there are many conjugation tables that use ''que'' to introduce a subjunctive form, there are none that use it to introduce indicative forms.) I hope that's clear; if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. :-) —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 21:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
9156 +++$+++ Wikihermit +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9154 +++$+++ 9155 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.181881920E09 +++$+++ Yup. I noticed, and I removed the note from the person I warned. Thanks! '''<span style=\"font-size:97%\"><font color=\"#33ff00\">''~''<\/font>&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Yup. I noticed, and I removed the note from the person I warned. Thanks! '''<span style="font-size:97%"><font color="#33ff00">''~''</font>&nbsp;[[User:Wikihermit|<font color="#33ff33">Wi</font><font color="#33ff66">ki</font>]][[User talk:Wikihermit|<font color="#33ff99">her</font><font color="#33ffcc">mit</font>]]</span>''' 21:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

9157 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-31 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.185922620E09 +++$+++ I don't suppose your edit summary could be more explicit, saying ''what'' tag it's adding? \u2014 +++$+++ I don't suppose your edit summary could be more explicit, saying ''what'' tag it's adding? —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]]<sub><small><i>[[User_talk:Ruakh|TALK]]</i></small></sub> 15:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
9158 +++$+++  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9157 +++$+++ 9157 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Very good point!  I think I've just changed the bot to do that.  Thanks for the suggestion!!! -- 16:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :Very good point!  I think I've just changed the bot to do that.  Thanks for the suggestion!!! -- 16:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
9159 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9157 +++$+++ 9158 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.185931080E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :-) \u2014 +++$+++ ::Thanks! :-) —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 18:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
9160 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9157 +++$+++ 9157 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.186433520E09 +++$+++ If you're trying to advertise a site \u2014 even a non-commercial site \u2014 by adding links to it from articles that don't benefit from the link (for example, linking from [[Adjective]] to the main page of a site about English grammar), I'd say you're spamming on its behalf. Maybe your intentions are good, but the result is the same as if the site owners were paying you for the service. \u2014 +++$+++ :If you're trying to advertise a site — even a non-commercial site — by adding links to it from articles that don't benefit from the link (for example, linking from [[Adjective]] to the main page of a site about English grammar), I'd say you're spamming on its behalf. Maybe your intentions are good, but the result is the same as if the site owners were paying you for the service. —[[User:Ruakh|Ruakh]] 13:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

271304 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-11 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.258007400E09 +++$+++ <s>:What about the truth of that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification&diff=325323263&oldid=325322521] Does the truth not matter to you. I have completed 236 GAN with no problems. The only problems came with two GARs (not the same as GAN) with two of the \"FAC editors\". Please learn the difference between GAN and GAR.  Why not get someone to pass [[M\xfcnchausen by Internet]] as a GA. My verdict is not the end all and be all. The same for the GAR of [[Attachment Therapy]], These GARs are the total \"evidence\" against me (repeated over and over) and were not GANs that I reviewed. So what do you mean? I completed 236 GAN reviews with no problems.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Mattisse\/GA] I have done none in the last several months because of purported complaints over this, when in essence there have been none.   Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ <s>:What about the truth of that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification&diff=325323263&oldid=325322521] Does the truth not matter to you. I have completed 236 GAN with no problems. The only problems came with two GARs (not the same as GAN) with two of the "FAC editors". Please learn the difference between GAN and GAR.  Why not get someone to pass [[Münchausen by Internet]] as a GA. My verdict is not the end all and be all. The same for the GAR of [[Attachment Therapy]], These GARs are the total "evidence" against me (repeated over and over) and were not GANs that I reviewed. So what do you mean? I completed 236 GAN reviews with no problems.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mattisse/GA] I have done none in the last several months because of purported complaints over this, when in essence there have been none.   Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
271305 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271304 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.258008120E09 +++$+++ If you want to present such information, it is in your own best interests to avoid anything remotely resembling inflammatory language, because such laugnage cannot be seen by anyone else as being remotely dealing with anything but emotion. To date, you have apparently failed in doing that. Factual data is best presented in a clear, unemotional, nonperjorative way. You have not expressed yourself in that manner. Again, remember, '''\xedt was specifically for situations like this one that the mentorship\/advisrorship was created'''. You are really not making anyone think that it is successful if you edit in a clearly emotional matter without having prior discussion. So, it is really in your own best interests to not respond directly to any statements which might be seen as being negative comments against you, either on that page or this one. Again, right now, the best thing to do is stop trying to defend yourself or respond to any comments, but to just take some time off, and, probably, by logging off for several hours. If you want to use that time to either compose comments you wish to make or something else, that would be the best atmosphere in which to create them. And, if you want to discuss things with others, I think it would probably be best to do so on their talk pages, where there is less chance of such comments as the one you seem to object to above. But, again, responding quickly to perceive insults doesn't help here. Just take some time off, possibly by logging off and composing something in Word or whatever, and maybe compose something that you wish to say. Then leave a message for me or GG or whomever to have it reviewed. But this is the time to take advantage of the mentorship, not to be seen to be acting without using it.  +++$+++ ::If you want to present such information, it is in your own best interests to avoid anything remotely resembling inflammatory language, because such laugnage cannot be seen by anyone else as being remotely dealing with anything but emotion. To date, you have apparently failed in doing that. Factual data is best presented in a clear, unemotional, nonperjorative way. You have not expressed yourself in that manner. Again, remember, '''ít was specifically for situations like this one that the mentorship/advisrorship was created'''. You are really not making anyone think that it is successful if you edit in a clearly emotional matter without having prior discussion. So, it is really in your own best interests to not respond directly to any statements which might be seen as being negative comments against you, either on that page or this one. Again, right now, the best thing to do is stop trying to defend yourself or respond to any comments, but to just take some time off, and, probably, by logging off for several hours. If you want to use that time to either compose comments you wish to make or something else, that would be the best atmosphere in which to create them. And, if you want to discuss things with others, I think it would probably be best to do so on their talk pages, where there is less chance of such comments as the one you seem to object to above. But, again, responding quickly to perceive insults doesn't help here. Just take some time off, possibly by logging off and composing something in Word or whatever, and maybe compose something that you wish to say. Then leave a message for me or GG or whomever to have it reviewed. But this is the time to take advantage of the mentorship, not to be seen to be acting without using it. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 22:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
271306 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271304 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.258008240E09 +++$+++ I have made a block for 12 hours. I have asked SilkTork to review this block. It is intended to avoid escalation of conflict and hence harm being done to the encyclopedia. I was saddened a lot to have to use this tool, but I will not disagree if any administrator feels I used it unwisely. '' +++$+++ :::I have made a block for 12 hours. I have asked SilkTork to review this block. It is intended to avoid escalation of conflict and hence harm being done to the encyclopedia. I was saddened a lot to have to use this tool, but I will not disagree if any administrator feels I used it unwisely. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 22:44, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
271307 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271304 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.258009260E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure whether that is to be taken as a request for input from others, or just as a statement. If the latter, then just wait the 12 hours and post the comment on the clarifications page. If the former, and you are asking others to indicate options, I would say that perhaps a simple statement to the effect that you will voluntarily, on your own, cease making any comments there might be enough, if you think you can do that. If you think others might question whether you can or not, then maybe indicating that you would be quite willing to accept such a ban might be enough. But I do think that the phrasing you used, requesting to be banned, might impress some people the wrong way.  +++$+++ :::::I'm not sure whether that is to be taken as a request for input from others, or just as a statement. If the latter, then just wait the 12 hours and post the comment on the clarifications page. If the former, and you are asking others to indicate options, I would say that perhaps a simple statement to the effect that you will voluntarily, on your own, cease making any comments there might be enough, if you think you can do that. If you think others might question whether you can or not, then maybe indicating that you would be quite willing to accept such a ban might be enough. But I do think that the phrasing you used, requesting to be banned, might impress some people the wrong way. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 23:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

533450 +++$+++ 96.229.193.68 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-03 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.225712760E09 +++$+++ I would like you to create article [[T\xe2n S\u01a1n Nh\u1ea5t International Airport fire]] from [http:\/\/nz.news.yahoo.com\/a\/-\/world\/5105664 here], you may write a short paragraph, I will expand it later, thank. [[Special:Contributions\/96.229.193.68|96.229.193.68]] ( +++$+++ I would like you to create article [[Tân Sơn Nhất International Airport fire]] from [http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/5105664 here], you may write a short paragraph, I will expand it later, thank. [[Special:Contributions/96.229.193.68|96.229.193.68]] ([[User talk:96.229.193.68|talk]]) 03:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
533451 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533450 +++$+++ 533450 +++$+++ 2008-11-03 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.225746180E09 +++$+++ Hi. You can create the article yourself, you just need to create an account. I invite you to do so, it is much more convenient and easier to communicate with other users. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. You can create the article yourself, you just need to create an account. I invite you to do so, it is much more convenient and easier to communicate with other users. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

9163 +++$+++ RCSB +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-25 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.188096600E09 +++$+++ \"I'm just a soul whose intentions are good... please don't let me be misunderstood\" - ''Elvis Costello''  +++$+++ "I'm just a soul whose intentions are good... please don't let me be misunderstood" - ''Elvis Costello'' [[User:RCSB|RCSB]] 19:50, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
9164 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9163 +++$+++ 9163 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.188434580E09 +++$+++ No, you're still not understanding. You talk about how the function is \"mathematically defined\", but you're looking at the wrong thing: that formula isn't a mathematical ''definition'', but a mathematical ''calculation''. We're ''defining'' the function as \"The probability that, given ''n'' random and independent events, each with the same 365 equally likely outcomes, two (or more) of the events have the same outcome.\" The ''formula'' is explicitly labeled as applying only to the case where ''n'' \u2264 365, but the function  ''itself'' is well-defined for all non-negative integers ''n''. Do you understand now? \u2014 +++$+++ :No, you're still not understanding. You talk about how the function is "mathematically defined", but you're looking at the wrong thing: that formula isn't a mathematical ''definition'', but a mathematical ''calculation''. We're ''defining'' the function as "The probability that, given ''n'' random and independent events, each with the same 365 equally likely outcomes, two (or more) of the events have the same outcome." The ''formula'' is explicitly labeled as applying only to the case where ''n'' ≤ 365, but the function  ''itself'' is well-defined for all non-negative integers ''n''. Do you understand now? —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 17:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

533452 +++$+++ 212.56.88.63 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-03 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.225776300E09 +++$+++ Hello, you have deleted the ProQuake page. This is one of the most important Quake modifications in the gaming community, significant for it's ongoing continuation of a very significant ten year old game, and significant in it's being a de facto standard for contemporary Quake 1 play. Could you restore the article please, or explain how you see it not being significant. Thank you [[Special:Contributions\/212.56.88.63|212.56.88.63]] ( +++$+++ Hello, you have deleted the ProQuake page. This is one of the most important Quake modifications in the gaming community, significant for it's ongoing continuation of a very significant ten year old game, and significant in it's being a de facto standard for contemporary Quake 1 play. Could you restore the article please, or explain how you see it not being significant. Thank you [[Special:Contributions/212.56.88.63|212.56.88.63]] ([[User talk:212.56.88.63|talk]]) 21:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
533453 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533452 +++$+++ 533452 +++$+++ 2008-11-03 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.225776660E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process. Since you object, I will restore the article (standard procedure). However, since the article was tagged by two users, I'll send it through afd (standard procedure as well). The bigghes problem is third party sources. If you can fix that, I am sure there will be no problems with keeping it. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process. Since you object, I will restore the article (standard procedure). However, since the article was tagged by two users, I'll send it through afd (standard procedure as well). The bigghes problem is third party sources. If you can fix that, I am sure there will be no problems with keeping it. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

9165 +++$+++ 74.128.180.241 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9165 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-06 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.189063920E09 +++$+++ i'm not sure why only 'see' should be italicized. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Spanish_irregular_verbs&diff=next&oldid=155487667]  +++$+++ i'm not sure why only 'see' should be italicized. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_irregular_verbs&diff=next&oldid=155487667] [[User:74.128.180.241|74.128.180.241]] 00:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
9166 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9165 +++$+++ 9165 +++$+++ 2007-09-06 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.189064340E09 +++$+++ Me either, really, but that's always how we do it. (I think it would make more sense to italicize the article name, actually.) \u2014 +++$+++ :Me either, really, but that's always how we do it. (I think it would make more sense to italicize the article name, actually.) —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 00:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
9167 +++$+++ 74.128.180.241 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9165 +++$+++ 9166 +++$+++ 2007-09-06 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.189064400E09 +++$+++ I see, i didn't realize that was the standard way of doing so.  +++$+++ ::I see, i didn't realize that was the standard way of doing so. [[User:74.128.180.241|74.128.180.241]] 00:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

533454 +++$+++ Dob78 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-04 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.225827360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dob78|Dob78]] ([[User talk:Dob78|talk]]) 11:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
533455 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533454 +++$+++ 533454 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.225831740E09 +++$+++ Hi. Most of the article was indeed written in advertising style. Thus, deletion. The articles you mention are not an excellent example of non-advertising prose, really ;-) If they exist, this may be because nobody has tagged them yet. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Most of the article was indeed written in advertising style. Thus, deletion. The articles you mention are not an excellent example of non-advertising prose, really ;-) If they exist, this may be because nobody has tagged them yet. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

271311 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271311 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-12 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.258014960E09 +++$+++ You have ten minutes to comply or I will extend your block by 24 hours. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ You have ten minutes to comply or I will extend your block by 24 hours. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 00:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
271312 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271311 +++$+++ 271311 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.258015860E09 +++$+++ I have extended the block. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :I have extended the block. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 00:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
271313 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271311 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.258017060E09 +++$+++ Click on your User contributions, and you should see the block notice. Essentially you are blocked until 7.50 Greenwich Mean Time on November 13. Will you please now strike the negative comments about Fainites, and make no more negative comments about any Wikipedia editor anywhere on Wikipedia - regardless of what you feel is the provocation. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :::Click on your User contributions, and you should see the block notice. Essentially you are blocked until 7.50 Greenwich Mean Time on November 13. Will you please now strike the negative comments about Fainites, and make no more negative comments about any Wikipedia editor anywhere on Wikipedia - regardless of what you feel is the provocation. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 01:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
271314 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271311 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.258075080E09 +++$+++ I revised the comments about Fainites to indicate that she has contributed no new evidence. Yesterday I reverted another comment upon request. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification&diff=prev&oldid=325317643] \u2014 +++$+++ ::::I revised the comments about Fainites to indicate that she has contributed no new evidence. Yesterday I reverted another comment upon request. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification&diff=prev&oldid=325317643] —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:18, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
271315 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271311 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.258093620E09 +++$+++ I found [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FClarification&action=historysubmit&diff=325342413&oldid=325323801 Fainites comments] hard to understand, but responding precipitously to them served no purpose. I was myself tempted to respond that the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment\/M\xfcnchausen_by_Internet\/1&oldid=307622934 MBI GAR was initated by Moni3] nearly three hours prior to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AM\xfcnchausen_by_Internet%2FGA1&action=historysubmit&diff=307651881&oldid=307619490 Mattisse's first involvement] when the GAN was already closed, but quite frankly, how would it help to move forwards to rehash this? Plus my perceptions could be wrong! I do not recommend lifting this block unless Mattisse understands the need for restraint and consulting with advisors before posting under stress. '' +++$+++ :::::I found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FClarification&action=historysubmit&diff=325342413&oldid=325323801 Fainites comments] hard to understand, but responding precipitously to them served no purpose. I was myself tempted to respond that the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Münchausen_by_Internet/1&oldid=307622934 MBI GAR was initated by Moni3] nearly three hours prior to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMünchausen_by_Internet%2FGA1&action=historysubmit&diff=307651881&oldid=307619490 Mattisse's first involvement] when the GAN was already closed, but quite frankly, how would it help to move forwards to rehash this? Plus my perceptions could be wrong! I do not recommend lifting this block unless Mattisse understands the need for restraint and consulting with advisors before posting under stress. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 22:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
271316 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271311 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-13 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.258104540E09 +++$+++ I too find the comments of  Fainites hard to understand. But then again, most of the \"clarification\" is rehash, diffs, and essay form information that  misprepresents.  No one dispassionately evaluating the evidence.  Fainites really is not  been involved in my editing at all, except the two  incidents (now past and hashed out in the prior arbitration).  I think that if arbs looked at the incidents \"against\" me at the \"clarification\", they will find very few after the arbcom closed, and fewer after August 31,  and those were minor except for the sockpuppeting incident. But facts are an irrelevant  here. And I see little indication that arbs will actually evaluate the evidence presented. I hope that if they reopen the case, they will put time limits on the endless rehashing of the old, some even going back to 2006. Also, I hope they disallow ong essays on an editor's personal circumstances and viewpoints. We could all write essays on our list of woes. I bet mind could easily beat Sandy's! (joke).  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::: I too find the comments of  Fainites hard to understand. But then again, most of the "clarification" is rehash, diffs, and essay form information that  misprepresents.  No one dispassionately evaluating the evidence.  Fainites really is not  been involved in my editing at all, except the two  incidents (now past and hashed out in the prior arbitration).  I think that if arbs looked at the incidents "against" me at the "clarification", they will find very few after the arbcom closed, and fewer after August 31,  and those were minor except for the sockpuppeting incident. But facts are an irrelevant  here. And I see little indication that arbs will actually evaluate the evidence presented. I hope that if they reopen the case, they will put time limits on the endless rehashing of the old, some even going back to 2006. Also, I hope they disallow ong essays on an editor's personal circumstances and viewpoints. We could all write essays on our list of woes. I bet mind could easily beat Sandy's! (joke).  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
271317 +++$+++ Fainites +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271311 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-13 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.258148400E09 +++$+++ Well I was trying to clarify an issue raised by Mattisse and SandyGeorgia first. My apologies if I did the opposite but I was not aware Moni3 had formally GAR'd MBI. Anyway - the purpose of my post was to address the claim by Mattisse that only FAC was a problem, not GAN. As you can see, I pointed out that although Mattisse had got involved in other's GAN and had GAR'd, she has not, to my knowledge, done an initial GAN of a plague list editor that has caused any comment. +++$+++ ::::::::::Well I was trying to clarify an issue raised by Mattisse and SandyGeorgia first. My apologies if I did the opposite but I was not aware Moni3 had formally GAR'd MBI. Anyway - the purpose of my post was to address the claim by Mattisse that only FAC was a problem, not GAN. As you can see, I pointed out that although Mattisse had got involved in other's GAN and had GAR'd, she has not, to my knowledge, done an initial GAN of a plague list editor that has caused any comment.[[User:Fainites|Fainites]] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Fainites|barley]]</small></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Fainites|<small>scribs</small>]] 13:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

9168 +++$+++ Ghazer +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-07 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.189207500E09 +++$+++ thank you for moving my contribution concerning power means inequality, i copied it from an user supbpage of mine, and pasted it in a wrong place.-- +++$+++ thank you for moving my contribution concerning power means inequality, i copied it from an user supbpage of mine, and pasted it in a wrong place.--[[User:Ghazer|Ghazer]] 16:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
9169 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9168 +++$+++ 9168 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.189210560E09 +++$+++ No prob. Thanks for adding it! :-) \u2014 +++$+++ :No prob. Thanks for adding it! :-) —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 17:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

9170 +++$+++ Greg_L +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-28 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.191035940E09 +++$+++ Ruakh, was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Kilogram&diff=160978000&oldid=160977426 this edit summary comment] of yours (\u201cpartial rv: I *do* understand XHTML, and use it on my own sites, but this is simpler\/prettier for non-technical editors, and MediaWiki converts it to proper XHTML.\u201d) directed at me? I don\u2019t care about what method is used. I only give a rip about the end result. As I wrote [[Talk:Kilogram#Concern|here]] on the Kilogram talk page that I\u2019ve been trying to take care of obscure new paragraphs that follow superscripted lines. Now that I just looked at that discussion topic, I see that [[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]] has a hard-on over the methodology being used. Is that who you\u2019re arguing with? What\u2019s going on?  +++$+++ Ruakh, was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kilogram&diff=160978000&oldid=160977426 this edit summary comment] of yours (“partial rv: I *do* understand XHTML, and use it on my own sites, but this is simpler/prettier for non-technical editors, and MediaWiki converts it to proper XHTML.”) directed at me? I don’t care about what method is used. I only give a rip about the end result. As I wrote [[Talk:Kilogram#Concern|here]] on the Kilogram talk page that I’ve been trying to take care of obscure new paragraphs that follow superscripted lines. Now that I just looked at that discussion topic, I see that [[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]] has a hard-on over the methodology being used. Is that who you’re arguing with? What’s going on? [[User:Greg L|Greg L]] (''[[User_talk:Greg_L|my talk]])'' 20:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
9171 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9170 +++$+++ 9170 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.191036480E09 +++$+++ No, not at you; it was a reply to [[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]]'s edit summary (one previous). \u2014 +++$+++ :No, not at you; it was a reply to [[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]]'s edit summary (one previous). —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 20:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

176291 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-15 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.276648440E09 +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice -->  +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 17:34, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
176292 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ 176291 +++$+++ 176291 +++$+++ 2010-09-17 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.284724800E09 +++$+++ I used [[Inkscape]]. Regards &mdash; +++$+++ : I used [[Inkscape]]. Regards &mdash;[[User:BillC|<span style="background:#803020;color:white;font-variant:small-caps">'''BillC'''</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 05:00, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

533460 +++$+++ Jay-Kins +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-05 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.225879380E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Jay-Kins|Jay-Kins]] ([[User talk:Jay-Kins|talk]]) 02:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
533461 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533460 +++$+++ 533460 +++$+++ 2008-11-05 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.225935360E09 +++$+++ Hi. Because the article has been deleted and reposted several times, I suggest you write the new version as a subpage of your userpage. Then, if it's ok, we can repost it. I guess it's the best way to do. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Because the article has been deleted and reposted several times, I suggest you write the new version as a subpage of your userpage. Then, if it's ok, we can repost it. I guess it's the best way to do. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

9173 +++$+++ Til Eulenspiegel +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-19 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.192842240E09 +++$+++ I saw where last January you discussed on a MOS talkpage, the question of whether the word \"Biblical\" should be capitalized like all other proper adjectives; you may wish to take part in the RFC on this at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bible]].  Thanks,  +++$+++ I saw where last January you discussed on a MOS talkpage, the question of whether the word "Biblical" should be capitalized like all other proper adjectives; you may wish to take part in the RFC on this at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bible]].  Thanks, [[User:Til Eulenspiegel|Til Eulenspiegel]] 18:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
9174 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9173 +++$+++ 9173 +++$+++ 2007-10-19 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.192854060E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :-) \u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks! :-) —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 21:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

271318 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-13 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.258105020E09 +++$+++ Meanwhile,  I will continue to try to defend myself.  see http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/Advisory_Council_on_Project_Development&diff=301765674&oldid=301765659 regarding allegation that I wanted Krill's resignation. Just more misinformation.  \u2014 +++$+++ Meanwhile,  I will continue to try to defend myself.  see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Advisory_Council_on_Project_Development&diff=301765674&oldid=301765659 regarding allegation that I wanted Krill's resignation. Just more misinformation.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
271319 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271318 +++$+++ 271318 +++$+++ 2009-11-13 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.258173540E09 +++$+++ For information, I replied by email this morning and about an hour ago. '' +++$+++ : For information, I replied by email this morning and about an hour ago. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 20:39, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

9175 +++$+++ MisterSheik +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9175 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-31 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.193817240E09 +++$+++ So, we're in an edit war.  I won't take it personally.  In my opinion the difference comes down to prescriptivism versus descriptivism.  American Heritage is descriptivist, even accepting comprise to be a reasonable substitute for \"compose\"!  I know that they do this because there are a lot of people that talk like this.  As a prescrivist, I am totally against this; my preferred sources are OED and Fowler.  If I were to frame the debate, I would say it's a decision between writing concisely and writing as people speak.   +++$+++ So, we're in an edit war.  I won't take it personally.  In my opinion the difference comes down to prescriptivism versus descriptivism.  American Heritage is descriptivist, even accepting comprise to be a reasonable substitute for "compose"!  I know that they do this because there are a lot of people that talk like this.  As a prescrivist, I am totally against this; my preferred sources are OED and Fowler.  If I were to frame the debate, I would say it's a decision between writing concisely and writing as people speak.  [[User:MisterSheik|MisterSheik]] 00:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
9176 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9175 +++$+++ 9175 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.193818320E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ : —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 01:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

9178 +++$+++ LeeMulod333 +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9178 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-02 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.196631720E09 +++$+++ Are you Bukharian Jewish or Muslim?  +++$+++ Are you Bukharian Jewish or Muslim? [[User:LeeMulod333|LeeMulod333]] 13:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
9179 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9178 +++$+++ 9178 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.196932140E09 +++$+++ (Sorry for the late reply; I'm currently without Internet at home, so my wiki-ing has become sporadic.) My father's family are Bukharim, so halakhically speaking, I am as well. (My mother's family are [[Galicia (Central Europe)|Galician]] Jews, though.) I certainly identify as Bukhari more than I do as Galician, but seeing as I don't at all identify as Galician, that doesn't say very much. :-P &nbsp; If you're curious, I think I use \"Bukhari\", \"Bukharan\", and \"Bukharian\" more or less interchangeably, but I'm not sure. I certainly never say \"Bukhori\" or \"Bukharic\", though. Regardless, my point is that it's irrelevant what word(s) you and I use; Google says that [[google:\"Bukharan\"|\"Bukharan\"]] is more common than [[google:\"Bukharian\"|\"Bukharian\"]] by a factor of more than two. \u2014 +++$+++ : (Sorry for the late reply; I'm currently without Internet at home, so my wiki-ing has become sporadic.) My father's family are Bukharim, so halakhically speaking, I am as well. (My mother's family are [[Galicia (Central Europe)|Galician]] Jews, though.) I certainly identify as Bukhari more than I do as Galician, but seeing as I don't at all identify as Galician, that doesn't say very much. :-P &nbsp; If you're curious, I think I use "Bukhari", "Bukharan", and "Bukharian" more or less interchangeably, but I'm not sure. I certainly never say "Bukhori" or "Bukharic", though. Regardless, my point is that it's irrelevant what word(s) you and I use; Google says that [[google:"Bukharan"|"Bukharan"]] is more common than [[google:"Bukharian"|"Bukharian"]] by a factor of more than two. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 01:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

9180 +++$+++ C S +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-27 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.211897880E09 +++$+++ I found [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Nothing_up_my_sleeve_number&diff=214638944&oldid=214637597 your edit] on the mark and the edit summary gave me a chuckle.  What on earth is Wikipedia coming to?  If you find any other preposterous claims of POV, let me know; I've started a section on my user page for such foolishness.  -- +++$+++ I found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nothing_up_my_sleeve_number&diff=214638944&oldid=214637597 your edit] on the mark and the edit summary gave me a chuckle.  What on earth is Wikipedia coming to?  If you find any other preposterous claims of POV, let me know; I've started a section on my user page for such foolishness.  --[[User:C S|C S]] ([[User talk:C S|talk]]) 07:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
9181 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9180 +++$+++ 9180 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.211967000E09 +++$+++ :-) \u2014 +++$+++ : :-) —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 02:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

9182 +++$+++ Rhmccullough +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9182 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-16 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.213610040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Rhmccullough|Rhmccullough]] ([[User talk:Rhmccullough|talk]]) 02:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
9183 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9182 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.213639920E09 +++$+++ Well, I changed ''the'' definition section; I don't know what this \"my\" is that you refer to. ;-) &nbsp; &nbsp; (Note: if my changes introduced any errors, I'm sorry, and please do correct them. I was trying to put the article into encyclopedia format, and there wasn't a one-to-one mapping from the previous format to encyclopedia format.) Those references are fine, provided they're attached to statements that they actually support; but the article about mKR can't make a claim about it, and attach a reference that doesn't say anything about mKR. To do so would be misleading, not to say deceptive. (For comparison, imagine that the article about George W. Bush labeled him a Democrat and explained what that meant, and gave as its \"reference\" a work published in 1978 that explains what \"Democrat\" means and doesn't mention Bush. The article would then have two problems: a false statement, and a reference that doesn't support the statement it's attached to. Presumably the statements in [[mKR (programming language)]] are true, but that only solves one of the problems. Do you see what I mean?) \u2014 +++$+++ :: Well, I changed ''the'' definition section; I don't know what this "my" is that you refer to. ;-) &nbsp; &nbsp; (Note: if my changes introduced any errors, I'm sorry, and please do correct them. I was trying to put the article into encyclopedia format, and there wasn't a one-to-one mapping from the previous format to encyclopedia format.) Those references are fine, provided they're attached to statements that they actually support; but the article about mKR can't make a claim about it, and attach a reference that doesn't say anything about mKR. To do so would be misleading, not to say deceptive. (For comparison, imagine that the article about George W. Bush labeled him a Democrat and explained what that meant, and gave as its "reference" a work published in 1978 that explains what "Democrat" means and doesn't mention Bush. The article would then have two problems: a false statement, and a reference that doesn't support the statement it's attached to. Presumably the statements in [[mKR (programming language)]] are true, but that only solves one of the problems. Do you see what I mean?) —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 11:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
9184 +++$+++ Rhmccullough +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9182 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.213646820E09 +++$+++ I didn't know what a \"Lead\" was, until one of your editors posted a note on the article this morning. Thanks for fixing it. I understand what you mean about references.  +++$+++ :::I didn't know what a "Lead" was, until one of your editors posted a note on the article this morning. Thanks for fixing it. I understand what you mean about references. [[User:Rhmccullough|Rhmccullough]] ([[User talk:Rhmccullough|talk]]) 13:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

9185 +++$+++ ShepBot +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9185 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-25 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.224933360E09 +++$+++ Delivered by: <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ Delivered by: <font color="green">[[User:ShepBot|'''§hepBot''']]</font>'''&nbsp;<small>(<font color="red">[[User talk:ShepBot|Disable]]</font>)'''</small> 04:16, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
9186 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9185 +++$+++ 9185 +++$+++ 2008-10-25 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.224986760E09 +++$+++ I'm not very active on Wikipedia anymore, but thank you, automated process, for the invitation. :-) &nbsp; \u2014 +++$+++ : I'm not very active on Wikipedia anymore, but thank you, automated process, for the invitation. :-) &nbsp; —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 19:06, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

271333 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-15 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.258335120E09 +++$+++ Thus far, no one has responded, and so you can still reduce or remove your post. In general, I advise you to respond only to new information, and with new information. You should also avoid making any post which may be considered pointy or irritating.  I recommend you consult with advisors and await a response before adding to the request for clarification. We can also comment on your behalf. '' +++$+++ Thus far, no one has responded, and so you can still reduce or remove your post. In general, I advise you to respond only to new information, and with new information. You should also avoid making any post which may be considered pointy or irritating.  I recommend you consult with advisors and await a response before adding to the request for clarification. We can also comment on your behalf. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 17:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
271334 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271333 +++$+++ 271333 +++$+++ 2009-11-15 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.258335600E09 +++$+++ OK. I removed my post as you suggested. I do think that avoiding all \"FAC editors\" on [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations]] is unrealistic. I also think reifying the \"plague\" list and adding to it is the wrong direction to go. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :OK. I removed my post as you suggested. I do think that avoiding all "FAC editors" on [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations]] is unrealistic. I also think reifying the "plague" list and adding to it is the wrong direction to go. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
271335 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271333 +++$+++ 271334 +++$+++ 2009-11-15 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.258336500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for doing that. Concerning restrictions on interactions with other editors, I would agree that any house should be built on a firm foundation, and it does not help the community to move forwards to build proposals on this unhappy incident. '' +++$+++ ::Thanks for doing that. Concerning restrictions on interactions with other editors, I would agree that any house should be built on a firm foundation, and it does not help the community to move forwards to build proposals on this unhappy incident. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 17:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
271336 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271333 +++$+++ 271335 +++$+++ 2009-11-15 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.258338180E09 +++$+++ I've added a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification&diff=prev&oldid=326013766 short comment] (#2) on your position re FA. Let me know here if you wish me to clarify this in any way, or if there is further information that you think could usefully be added. '' +++$+++ :::I've added a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification&diff=prev&oldid=326013766 short comment] (#2) on your position re FA. Let me know here if you wish me to clarify this in any way, or if there is further information that you think could usefully be added. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 18:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

9190 +++$+++ Spaceman7Spiff +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9190 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-23 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.243074780E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}<\/code> to '''the top of [[:Yehonathan Gatro|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or \"db\" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Yehonathan Gatro|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-bio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom -->  +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Yehonathan Gatro|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Yehonathan Gatro|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-bio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Spaceman7Spiff|SpacemanSpiff]] ([[User talk:Spaceman7Spiff|talk]]) 03:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
9191 +++$+++ Spaceman7Spiff +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9190 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.243115280E09 +++$+++ Hi, When I put in the tag, it was of notability, I couldn't find much on Google for the person (news.google.com\/archivesearch, not just websites that promote music, but rather those that prove some notability). I believe it was closed on copyright violation of the text being a replica from www.youtube.com\/user\/FALLONCO (I did not check for copy vio, so I don't know about this). If you believe that this is not the case and you can prove notability, you can try re-creating the page but with sufficient citations; if you go through the help sections, you may also find out how to reinstate a deleted page since the reasons for deletion weren't sufficient or it happened prematurely.- +++$+++ ::Hi, When I put in the tag, it was of notability, I couldn't find much on Google for the person (news.google.com/archivesearch, not just websites that promote music, but rather those that prove some notability). I believe it was closed on copyright violation of the text being a replica from www.youtube.com/user/FALLONCO (I did not check for copy vio, so I don't know about this). If you believe that this is not the case and you can prove notability, you can try re-creating the page but with sufficient citations; if you go through the help sections, you may also find out how to reinstate a deleted page since the reasons for deletion weren't sufficient or it happened prematurely.-[[User:Spaceman7Spiff|SpacemanSpiff]] ([[User talk:Spaceman7Spiff|talk]]) 14:48, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

533480 +++$+++ 65.120.67.98 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533480 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-12 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.226559060E09 +++$+++ Tone, Ouch!  My feelings are hurt.  Neither I nor anyone I am associated with created my Wikipedia page, so I must have been notable to someone besides my wife and kids.  Actually, I have always wondered who that was.  Anyway, if you could reinstate the page, that would be great.  I offer no other reason than it was nice to be noted and I wouldn't say that my career has been insignificant.  Thanks, Brant [[Special:Contributions\/65.120.67.98|65.120.67.98]] ( +++$+++ Tone, Ouch!  My feelings are hurt.  Neither I nor anyone I am associated with created my Wikipedia page, so I must have been notable to someone besides my wife and kids.  Actually, I have always wondered who that was.  Anyway, if you could reinstate the page, that would be great.  I offer no other reason than it was nice to be noted and I wouldn't say that my career has been insignificant.  Thanks, Brant [[Special:Contributions/65.120.67.98|65.120.67.98]] ([[User talk:65.120.67.98|talk]]) 22:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
533481 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533480 +++$+++ 533480 +++$+++ 2008-11-12 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.226559900E09 +++$+++ Hi. Don't take admin actions too personal ;-) The article was deleted in the proposed deletion process, since you object, the standard follow is to restore the article. However, I'd be happy if the article had some more footnote style references. Nothing that can't be fixed. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Don't take admin actions too personal ;-) The article was deleted in the proposed deletion process, since you object, the standard follow is to restore the article. However, I'd be happy if the article had some more footnote style references. Nothing that can't be fixed. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 23:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

9193 +++$+++ Dampinograaf +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-09 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.257829500E09 +++$+++ Keep up the good work! -- +++$+++ Keep up the good work! --[[User:Dampinograaf|Dampinograaf]] ([[User talk:Dampinograaf|talk]]) 21:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
9194 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9193 +++$+++ 9193 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.257848220E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, I didn't mean any offense. The result looked so crazy that it seemed like obvious vandalism, but on second look, I see how it could have been caused by hitting Ctrl+V a few times too many. \u2014 +++$+++ : I'm sorry, I didn't mean any offense. The result looked so crazy that it seemed like obvious vandalism, but on second look, I see how it could have been caused by hitting Ctrl+V a few times too many. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 02:17, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

271339 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-17 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.258491120E09 +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse. If you can spare a little time from your lengthening to-do list, another editor asked me for some advise and I realised that the job needs more info than I have. [[User:Bugboy52.40|Bugboy52.40]] has got [[Insect]] to GA and is raring to go to work on lower-level insect taxa. Organising the info requires a lot of thought, as there are millions of species, so at least hundreds of genera, and so up the taxonomic tree. Bugboy52.40 asked me if Hide\/show boxes would help, and I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABugboy52.40&action=historysubmit&diff=326335698&oldid=326313055 listed] some disadvantages. List-class articles and\/or Categories might be worth using. I haven't used these, so I promised to see if I can get some advice. Do you do about List-class articles and\/or Categories, or all ways or organising huge numbers of related articles? Do you do know others editors how know much about this type of task? AFAIK you've had no previous contact with Bugboy52.40, and I've enjoyed our (limited) discussions. So I think it would be fine for you to post at [[User talk:Bugboy52.40 | Bugboy52.40's Talk page]] any info, leads, etc. on how to marshal the millions. -- +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse. If you can spare a little time from your lengthening to-do list, another editor asked me for some advise and I realised that the job needs more info than I have. [[User:Bugboy52.40|Bugboy52.40]] has got [[Insect]] to GA and is raring to go to work on lower-level insect taxa. Organising the info requires a lot of thought, as there are millions of species, so at least hundreds of genera, and so up the taxonomic tree. Bugboy52.40 asked me if Hide/show boxes would help, and I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABugboy52.40&action=historysubmit&diff=326335698&oldid=326313055 listed] some disadvantages. List-class articles and/or Categories might be worth using. I haven't used these, so I promised to see if I can get some advice. Do you do about List-class articles and/or Categories, or all ways or organising huge numbers of related articles? Do you do know others editors how know much about this type of task? AFAIK you've had no previous contact with Bugboy52.40, and I've enjoyed our (limited) discussions. So I think it would be fine for you to post at [[User talk:Bugboy52.40 | Bugboy52.40's Talk page]] any info, leads, etc. on how to marshal the millions. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 12:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
271340 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271339 +++$+++ 271339 +++$+++ 2009-11-17 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.258516260E09 +++$+++ Hi Philcha. I don't know anything about organizing biological information. I could probably learn, but I have no ideas of my own on how it should be done. In fact, in doing a couple of flower  and coral  articles, I found it very confusing and basically left out the tax box. So I am not sure how helpful I can be.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Hi Philcha. I don't know anything about organizing biological information. I could probably learn, but I have no ideas of my own on how it should be done. In fact, in doing a couple of flower  and coral  articles, I found it very confusing and basically left out the tax box. So I am not sure how helpful I can be.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:51, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

9196 +++$+++ Widsith +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-08 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.265640780E09 +++$+++ Haha!  +++$+++ Haha! [[User:Widsith|Widsith]] ([[User talk:Widsith|talk]]) 06:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
9197 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9196 +++$+++ 9196 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.265877660E09 +++$+++ You know you're a wiki addict when . . . \u2014 +++$+++ : You know you're a wiki addict when . . . —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 00:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
9198 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9196 +++$+++ 9196 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.265877660E09 +++$+++ Nah, it's a bug in the OGG player. There's nothing I can do about it. But thanks for trying to let me know. :-) &nbsp; \u2014 +++$+++ : Nah, it's a bug in the OGG player. There's nothing I can do about it. But thanks for trying to let me know. :-) &nbsp; —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 00:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

271341 +++$+++ Monkeybait +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-17 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.258503780E09 +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for your image uploads. Could you please start using more specific licenses for the government images you upload? Instead of PD-USGov for Fish and Wildlife Service images, use PD-USGov-Interior-FWS, or PD-USGov-DOC-NOAA for NOAA images. Thanks.-- +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for your image uploads. Could you please start using more specific licenses for the government images you upload? Instead of PD-USGov for Fish and Wildlife Service images, use PD-USGov-Interior-FWS, or PD-USGov-DOC-NOAA for NOAA images. Thanks.--[[User:Monkeybait|Monkeybait]] ([[User talk:Monkeybait|talk]]) 16:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
271342 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271341 +++$+++ 271341 +++$+++ 2009-11-17 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.258515960E09 +++$+++ Thanks Monkeybait, but I don't get how to do that. The select box only offers five choices, and there does not seem to be a way to add the ones you suggest. Do you mean that I should add it after, i.e. edit the upload page after it is uploaded?  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks Monkeybait, but I don't get how to do that. The select box only offers five choices, and there does not seem to be a way to add the ones you suggest. Do you mean that I should add it after, i.e. edit the upload page after it is uploaded?  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
271343 +++$+++ Monkeybait +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271341 +++$+++ 271342 +++$+++ 2009-11-17 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.258520640E09 +++$+++ Yeah, you will have to change it after you upload it. Unfortunately the scroll box doesn't offer all the choices for licenses.-- +++$+++ ::Yeah, you will have to change it after you upload it. Unfortunately the scroll box doesn't offer all the choices for licenses.--[[User:Monkeybait|Monkeybait]] ([[User talk:Monkeybait|talk]]) 21:04, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
271344 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271341 +++$+++ 271343 +++$+++ 2009-11-17 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.258520880E09 +++$+++ OK. I have been adding it after. Are there other licenses I should know about besides those two? Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::OK. I have been adding it after. Are there other licenses I should know about besides those two? Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
271345 +++$+++ Monkeybait +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271341 +++$+++ 271344 +++$+++ 2009-11-17 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.258521180E09 +++$+++ You can find all the US government license templates here - [[:Category:Wikipedia image copyright templates]]. Some just add the initials of the govt agency after the \"PD-USGov\" part, some are not as intuitive-- +++$+++ ::::You can find all the US government license templates here - [[:Category:Wikipedia image copyright templates]]. Some just add the initials of the govt agency after the "PD-USGov" part, some are not as intuitive--[[User:Monkeybait|Monkeybait]] ([[User talk:Monkeybait|talk]]) 21:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
271346 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271341 +++$+++ 271345 +++$+++ 2009-11-17 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.258521420E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::Thanks! Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

533486 +++$+++ Doma-w +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-15 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.226822340E09 +++$+++ Dear friend Tone! As you can see on my user page I have the biggest respect for you. So please allow me to ask you about the \"Infobox Olympic event\". Do you really like this infobox? Do you think that this infobox is really necessary? This infobox says exactly nothing new. And the biggest problem for me is, that all Olympic events have already an infobox on exactly the same place, in the top right corner... So we have two infoboxes for the same place. Isn't there any better idea? Kind regards  +++$+++ Dear friend Tone! As you can see on my user page I have the biggest respect for you. So please allow me to ask you about the "Infobox Olympic event". Do you really like this infobox? Do you think that this infobox is really necessary? This infobox says exactly nothing new. And the biggest problem for me is, that all Olympic events have already an infobox on exactly the same place, in the top right corner... So we have two infoboxes for the same place. Isn't there any better idea? Kind regards [[User:Doma-w|Doma-w]] ([[User talk:Doma-w|talk]]) 23:59, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
533487 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533486 +++$+++ 533486 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.226869920E09 +++$+++ Hi. Too bad you missed the debate at the Olympics Wikiproject... We discussed this infobox quite a lot. Sure, it does not bring additional information but is a nice way to organize all the details in one place. This is in fact an advantage since it is easy to compare different events. The events infobox can go under this one, I don't think there's anything wrong with it. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Too bad you missed the debate at the Olympics Wikiproject... We discussed this infobox quite a lot. Sure, it does not bring additional information but is a nice way to organize all the details in one place. This is in fact an advantage since it is easy to compare different events. The events infobox can go under this one, I don't think there's anything wrong with it. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
533488 +++$+++ Doma-w +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533486 +++$+++ 533487 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.226902620E09 +++$+++ Yes, I missed the debate... But I am happy because I saw the Olympics in Beijing - and this was of course better than discussing! :) Well the infobox is only created for the wrong place! And it makes no sense on most of the Olympic result pages like [[Athletics at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's 110 metre hurdles]]. There are more infoboxes than sentences (exactly two!)... Please allow me to ask you: Does it make sense to add the \"Infobox Olympic event\" also e.g. here: [[Boxing at the 1904 Summer Olympics - Bantamweight]]? But there are some more strange things on the Olympic pages; like the use of wrong (e.g. IRI =\"Islamic Republic of Iran\" is used for the years when Iran had a Shah.) country codes after a \"consensus\". So maybe it is better not to think about these things to much... Kind regards and :)  +++$+++ ::Yes, I missed the debate... But I am happy because I saw the Olympics in Beijing - and this was of course better than discussing! :) Well the infobox is only created for the wrong place! And it makes no sense on most of the Olympic result pages like [[Athletics at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's 110 metre hurdles]]. There are more infoboxes than sentences (exactly two!)... Please allow me to ask you: Does it make sense to add the "Infobox Olympic event" also e.g. here: [[Boxing at the 1904 Summer Olympics - Bantamweight]]? But there are some more strange things on the Olympic pages; like the use of wrong (e.g. IRI ="Islamic Republic of Iran" is used for the years when Iran had a Shah.) country codes after a "consensus". So maybe it is better not to think about these things to much... Kind regards and :) [[User:Doma-w|Doma-w]] ([[User talk:Doma-w|talk]]) 22:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
533489 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533486 +++$+++ 533488 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.226971440E09 +++$+++ Lucky you, you were at the olympics...  Where would you put the infobox then? I agree that sometimes there are just two infoboxes representing all the content of the article but have a look at [[Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics \u2013 Men's road race]], how it fits nice there (your photo by the way :-) ). When the articles will be long enough, it will all make much more sense. That's what I think, at least... And regarding the links to Iran, this should be systematically fixed with the flags templates. You should contact [[User:Andrwsc]], he's good at that. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ ::: Lucky you, you were at the olympics...  Where would you put the infobox then? I agree that sometimes there are just two infoboxes representing all the content of the article but have a look at [[Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Men's road race]], how it fits nice there (your photo by the way :-) ). When the articles will be long enough, it will all make much more sense. That's what I think, at least... And regarding the links to Iran, this should be systematically fixed with the flags templates. You should contact [[User:Andrwsc]], he's good at that. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
533490 +++$+++ Doma-w +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533486 +++$+++ 533489 +++$+++ 2008-11-20 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.227222060E09 +++$+++ Many thanks and kind reagrds from Vienna  +++$+++ :::: Many thanks and kind reagrds from Vienna [[User:Doma-w|Doma-w]] ([[User talk:Doma-w|talk]]) 15:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

9200 +++$+++ Fences and windows +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9200 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-11 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.297414500E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias\/Wikipedia:Racism]], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion\/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias\/Wikipedia:Racism ]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>).  You are free to edit the content of [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias\/Wikipedia:Racism]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion.  Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning -->  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Wikipedia:Racism]], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Wikipedia:Racism ]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).  You are free to edit the content of [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Wikipedia:Racism]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion.  Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&amp;</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 00:55, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
9201 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9200 +++$+++ 9200 +++$+++ 2011-02-11 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.297464000E09 +++$+++ I didn't really \"constribute\" to it; I merely created it. :-P &nbsp; I don't care if you delete it. \u2014 +++$+++ : I didn't really "constribute" to it; I merely created it. :-P &nbsp; I don't care if you delete it. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 14:40, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

438440 +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ 438440 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-05-05 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.083788040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the privlege and to those who voted for me  +++$+++ Thanks for the privlege and to those who voted for me [[User:SD6-Agent|SD6-Agent]] 13:14, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
438441 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ 438440 +++$+++ 438440 +++$+++ 2005-10-12 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.129123920E09 +++$+++ Given that I've explained more than once that the problem has to do with '''commercial vs. non-commercial use''', how is it that you still view the issue as being a dispute between Canadian and American law?  +++$+++ : Given that I've explained more than once that the problem has to do with '''commercial vs. non-commercial use''', how is it that you still view the issue as being a dispute between Canadian and American law? [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 06:32, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
438442 +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ 438440 +++$+++ 438441 +++$+++ 2005-10-12 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.129124040E09 +++$+++ I may not comprehend the issue entirely but I would have thought that by now someone would offer a solution as to solving this issue. +++$+++ :: I may not comprehend the issue entirely but I would have thought that by now someone would offer a solution as to solving this issue.[[User:SD6-Agent|SD6-Agent]] 06:34, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
438443 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ 438440 +++$+++ 438442 +++$+++ 2005-10-12 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.129125000E09 +++$+++ You don't need to understand every last nook and cranny of GFDL, but please understand the basic point that because of the way Wikipedia content is licensed, Wikipedia is a ''commercial'' use. As a result, using material licensed only for ''non-commercial'' use is problematic. Please just don't upload anything else that's licensed for non-commercial use, until we can get a clear answer regarding the legalities involved.  +++$+++ ::: You don't need to understand every last nook and cranny of GFDL, but please understand the basic point that because of the way Wikipedia content is licensed, Wikipedia is a ''commercial'' use. As a result, using material licensed only for ''non-commercial'' use is problematic. Please just don't upload anything else that's licensed for non-commercial use, until we can get a clear answer regarding the legalities involved. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 06:50, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
438444 +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ 438440 +++$+++ 438443 +++$+++ 2005-10-12 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.129126800E09 +++$+++ I agree. We need a lawyer, or someone who knows laws well enough, to offer a solution. If this isn't a Canada vs. US laws issue then I have to wonder how a lawyer could help us. +++$+++ :::: I agree. We need a lawyer, or someone who knows laws well enough, to offer a solution. If this isn't a Canada vs. US laws issue then I have to wonder how a lawyer could help us.[[User:SD6-Agent|SD6-Agent]] 07:20, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
438445 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ 438440 +++$+++ 438444 +++$+++ 2005-10-12 07:53:00 +++$+++ 1.129128780E09 +++$+++ It's unfortunate, but the reality is that there's a ''distinct'' possibility that we will have to delete the images. The way you've talked about the matter so far, I'm just worried that you'll take it a bit too personally if that's what happens.  +++$+++ ::::: It's unfortunate, but the reality is that there's a ''distinct'' possibility that we will have to delete the images. The way you've talked about the matter so far, I'm just worried that you'll take it a bit too personally if that's what happens. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 07:53, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
438446 +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ 438440 +++$+++ 438445 +++$+++ 2005-10-12 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.129129800E09 +++$+++ You're right. I do understand this is not a Canada-US issue but when the result of this is that information provided by the Canadian government can't be used here because of a law it contradicts then I feel slighted.As a Canadian, I feel that a slap in the face of Canadian law (Crown Copyright) is a slap in my face too.  +++$+++ :::::: You're right. I do understand this is not a Canada-US issue but when the result of this is that information provided by the Canadian government can't be used here because of a law it contradicts then I feel slighted.As a Canadian, I feel that a slap in the face of Canadian law (Crown Copyright) is a slap in my face too. [[User:SD6-Agent|SD6-Agent]] 08:10, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
438447 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ 438440 +++$+++ 438446 +++$+++ 2005-10-12 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.129131120E09 +++$+++ In the meantime, I've reviewed the items with this tag on it. \"Official portrait\" photos of political figures by themselves, intended mainly to illustrate their biographical pages, are ''unquestionably'' fair use. Retag those as <nowiki>{{promophoto}}<\/nowiki>, but do cite the source in the text box under the tag. But only do those for now; don't retag anything else (including group shots) until we can get further clarification.  +++$+++ ::::::: In the meantime, I've reviewed the items with this tag on it. "Official portrait" photos of political figures by themselves, intended mainly to illustrate their biographical pages, are ''unquestionably'' fair use. Retag those as <nowiki>{{promophoto}}</nowiki>, but do cite the source in the text box under the tag. But only do those for now; don't retag anything else (including group shots) until we can get further clarification. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 08:32, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
438448 +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ 438440 +++$+++ 438446 +++$+++ 2005-10-12 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.129133100E09 +++$+++ Understood. Do you know of any legal expert you could contact to clarify this issue?  +++$+++ ::::::: Understood. Do you know of any legal expert you could contact to clarify this issue? [[User:SD6-Agent|SD6-Agent]] 09:05, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

9202 +++$+++ Duoduoduo +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9202 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-24 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.306283280E09 +++$+++ Since you have edited the article or its talk page, I'd like to let you know that the article [[English conjugation tables]] has been nominated for deletion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/English conjugation tables]].  +++$+++ Since you have edited the article or its talk page, I'd like to let you know that the article [[English conjugation tables]] has been nominated for deletion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English conjugation tables]]. [[User:Duoduoduo|Duoduoduo]] ([[User talk:Duoduoduo|talk]]) 17:28, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
9203 +++$+++  Ruakh  +++$+++ Ruakh +++$+++ 9202 +++$+++ 9202 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.306284000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the notice. I agree with everything you say in your AfD nomination. \u2014 +++$+++ : Thanks for the notice. I agree with everything you say in your AfD nomination. —[[User: Ruakh |Ruakh]] 17:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

271347 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-18 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.258575180E09 +++$+++ Khrushchev did pass FA.  You are cordially invited to the celebration in Red Square.  You can stand on top of Lenin's Tomb with me.  Problem's going to be digging up enough Soviet weaponry, it's all been scrapped or sold off, to have a good parade.  Bring your mittens!-- +++$+++ Khrushchev did pass FA.  You are cordially invited to the celebration in Red Square.  You can stand on top of Lenin's Tomb with me.  Problem's going to be digging up enough Soviet weaponry, it's all been scrapped or sold off, to have a good parade.  Bring your mittens!--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 12:13, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
271348 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271347 +++$+++ 271347 +++$+++ 2009-11-18 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.258579260E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! I never doubted it would pass. I heard an author speak on  Kennedy's view that Khrushchev was a man with whom he felt he could develop a relationship. He saw a glimmer in Khrushchev and may have made something out of it if he had not been killed.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Congratulations! I never doubted it would pass. I heard an author speak on  Kennedy's view that Khrushchev was a man with whom he felt he could develop a relationship. He saw a glimmer in Khrushchev and may have made something out of it if he had not been killed.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 13:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
271349 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271347 +++$+++ 271348 +++$+++ 2009-11-18 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.258579740E09 +++$+++ I was reading the new bio of [[Helen Douglas]] (it isn't very good, really) and it mentions that she was used as a sort of conduit to pass a message from K through Mrs K to Lyndon Johnson (she almost certainly was Johnson's lover).  But nothing ever came of that either.-- +++$+++ ::I was reading the new bio of [[Helen Douglas]] (it isn't very good, really) and it mentions that she was used as a sort of conduit to pass a message from K through Mrs K to Lyndon Johnson (she almost certainly was Johnson's lover).  But nothing ever came of that either.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 13:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

533492 +++$+++ GrandTorino +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-16 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.226908620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:GrandTorino|GrandTorino]] ([[User talk:GrandTorino|talk]]) 23:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
533493 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533492 +++$+++ 533492 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.226947260E09 +++$+++ Several users tagged this article for lack of notability and I tend to agree with them. If you disagree, feel free to take the article to [[WP:DRV]], deletion review. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Several users tagged this article for lack of notability and I tend to agree with them. If you disagree, feel free to take the article to [[WP:DRV]], deletion review. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:41, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

9205 +++$+++ NapoliRoma +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-26 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.238096460E09 +++$+++ Do you know for sure either way how this is actually used in the film?  I was going to poke around a little more to try to find a citable source, but if you've seen the movie lately and tell me that's pointless, I'd be glad to give that up...  Regards,  +++$+++ Do you know for sure either way how this is actually used in the film?  I was going to poke around a little more to try to find a citable source, but if you've seen the movie lately and tell me that's pointless, I'd be glad to give that up...  Regards, [[User:NapoliRoma|NapoliRoma]] ([[User talk:NapoliRoma|talk]]) 12:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
9206 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9205 +++$+++ 9205 +++$+++ 2009-03-26 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.238099280E09 +++$+++ I didn't see the movie. I've undone the edit. I think the main problem was the edit history. It's just that a link to that movie without any further comment looked strange. At the most there should be an internal link in an \"See also\" section, not just an imdb link.-- +++$+++ :I didn't see the movie. I've undone the edit. I think the main problem was the edit history. It's just that a link to that movie without any further comment looked strange. At the most there should be an internal link in an "See also" section, not just an imdb link.--[[User:Ospalh|ospalh]] ([[User talk:Ospalh#top|talk]]) 13:28, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
9207 +++$+++ NapoliRoma +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9205 +++$+++ 9206 +++$+++ 2009-03-26 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.238107200E09 +++$+++ Since the movie now has its own WP article, I think your removal was actually the right thing to do; I just got thrown off by the edit summary -- which is I think what you were suggesting happened :-).  Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Since the movie now has its own WP article, I think your removal was actually the right thing to do; I just got thrown off by the edit summary -- which is I think what you were suggesting happened :-).  Cheers, [[User:NapoliRoma|NapoliRoma]] ([[User talk:NapoliRoma|talk]]) 15:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

533494 +++$+++ Mjr162006 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-17 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.226909280E09 +++$+++ What exactly was your rational for this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Elementary_School_Musical&diff=next&oldid=251814926 edit]? Personally I can't think of why you would ever even consider doing that. There are 179 other South Park episode pages. What exactly made you think it was okay to delete this one?-- +++$+++ What exactly was your rational for this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elementary_School_Musical&diff=next&oldid=251814926 edit]? Personally I can't think of why you would ever even consider doing that. There are 179 other South Park episode pages. What exactly made you think it was okay to delete this one?--[[User:Mjr162006|Matt]] ([[User talk:Mjr162006|talk]]) 00:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
533495 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533494 +++$+++ 533494 +++$+++ 2008-11-17 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.226971440E09 +++$+++ Hi. The problem with the article is that it contained nothing but release info and a list of features. Such articles should have some assesment of notability, otherwise Wikipedia would turn into a directory instead of encyclopedia. Maybe WP:ORG will be useful to read. I hope this helps. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The problem with the article is that it contained nothing but release info and a list of features. Such articles should have some assesment of notability, otherwise Wikipedia would turn into a directory instead of encyclopedia. Maybe WP:ORG will be useful to read. I hope this helps. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

533497 +++$+++ 216.165.46.205 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-18 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.227010920E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/216.165.46.205|216.165.46.205]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/216.165.46.205|216.165.46.205]] ([[User talk:216.165.46.205|talk]]) 04:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
533498 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533497 +++$+++ 533497 +++$+++ 2008-11-18 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.227024720E09 +++$+++ Hi. Sure, I can fix that, but the problem is that I can't find the article in the deletion log. Can you give me the full title (with correct capitals)? Then, if you create a wiki account, I can copy the contents of the article to your userpage and you can access it from there. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Sure, I can fix that, but the problem is that I can't find the article in the deletion log. Can you give me the full title (with correct capitals)? Then, if you create a wiki account, I can copy the contents of the article to your userpage and you can access it from there. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

9211 +++$+++ Marleen01 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-29 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.246316760E09 +++$+++ Hi Ospalh, Please excuse my previous edit as I just realized I was seriously in error and that your usage of [sic] was absolutely correct. My bad! I hope you can excuse my mistake. Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi Ospalh, Please excuse my previous edit as I just realized I was seriously in error and that your usage of [sic] was absolutely correct. My bad! I hope you can excuse my mistake. Thanks! [[User:Marleen01|Marleen]] ([[User talk:Marleen01|talk]]) 16:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
9212 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9211 +++$+++ 9211 +++$+++ 2009-06-29 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.246326480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the explanation and welcome back at Wikipedia. The meaning of the {{tl|sic}} is exactly that it was spelled Hindenberg in the original (I looked up the track listing at amazon and on other web pages.) I guess Richard Bone did mean the [[LZ 129 Hindenburg]]. Even if he didn't, at least some people (read, me) could think he did mean the airship. (I went through all the \"Hindenberg\"s and most were misspellings of Hindenburg.)-- +++$+++ :Thanks for the explanation and welcome back at Wikipedia. The meaning of the {{tl|sic}} is exactly that it was spelled Hindenberg in the original (I looked up the track listing at amazon and on other web pages.) I guess Richard Bone did mean the [[LZ 129 Hindenburg]]. Even if he didn't, at least some people (read, me) could think he did mean the airship. (I went through all the "Hindenberg"s and most were misspellings of Hindenburg.)--[[User:Ospalh|ospalh]] ([[User talk:Ospalh#top|talk]]) 18:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

271356 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-27 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.259372100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore|talk]]) 17:35, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
271357 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271356 +++$+++ 271356 +++$+++ 2009-11-27 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.259372640E09 +++$+++ The issue that you bring up is a question of judgment, and opinions will vary. The hook has passed and will undoubtedly be featured as a dyk;  the editor filling the dyk queue can select either hook (unless you object to the alternative) or even alter the hook to another version. You are right that the first hook has an air of mystery, as certainly \"why\" was the first question I asked myself. Also, your hook is shorter which is usually an advantage. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :The issue that you bring up is a question of judgment, and opinions will vary. The hook has passed and will undoubtedly be featured as a dyk;  the editor filling the dyk queue can select either hook (unless you object to the alternative) or even alter the hook to another version. You are right that the first hook has an air of mystery, as certainly "why" was the first question I asked myself. Also, your hook is shorter which is usually an advantage. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

9213 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-01 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.246484820E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I didn't realize editing [[User talk:Kevinbrogers|my own page]] could be considered vandalism... and for future reference, why?  +++$+++ Sorry, I didn't realize editing [[User talk:Kevinbrogers|my own page]] could be considered vandalism... and for future reference, why? [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 14:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
9214 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9213 +++$+++ 9213 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.246485060E09 +++$+++ It was your own ''talk'' page. An it's considered vandalism because you hid contributions by other editors. It is explained in the text you referred to, or again at [[WP:TPO]].-- +++$+++ :It was your own ''talk'' page. An it's considered vandalism because you hid contributions by other editors. It is explained in the text you referred to, or again at [[WP:TPO]].--[[User:Ospalh|ospalh]] ([[User talk:Ospalh#top|talk]]) 14:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
9215 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9213 +++$+++ 9213 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.246485240E09 +++$+++ Ah.  I still don't understand, but I'll leave it.  It just makes me a little mad that it appears as if the May 2009 comments say I vandalized a page when I was making legitimate contributions to it.  +++$+++ :Ah.  I still don't understand, but I'll leave it.  It just makes me a little mad that it appears as if the May 2009 comments say I vandalized a page when I was making legitimate contributions to it. [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 14:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

271358 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-28 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.259424480E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Bat star]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Bat star|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible.  Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Bat star]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Bat star|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible.  Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 08:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
271359 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271358 +++$+++ 271358 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.259450880E09 +++$+++ Addressed on under dyk entry. Thanks!  \u2014 +++$+++ :Addressed on under dyk entry. Thanks!  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:28, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

9216 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9216 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-01 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.246485900E09 +++$+++ Me again... I understand why it may appear as if the article isn't genuine, but, as I am the producer of it (and yes, it is legitimate), I know for certain that the article is true.  When references become available, I will post them.  +++$+++ Me again... I understand why it may appear as if the article isn't genuine, but, as I am the producer of it (and yes, it is legitimate), I know for certain that the article is true.  When references become available, I will post them. [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 15:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
9217 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9216 +++$+++ 9216 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.246487460E09 +++$+++ I didn't say [[The True Victory|it]] wasn't true. (I guess that's what you mean by \"[[wikt:genuine|genuine]]\") I'm not even saying it's not a worthwile project. (I have an opinion on that, but will keep it to myself.) (Other than that, I have no idea how a film could be \"[[wikt:legitimate|illegimiate]]\") I said it may not be [[wp:notability|notable]]. To be blunt, I'm not sure why anybody outside your church would give a wet slap about this film. And that's at least a part of of notability. Another part is having some idependant, reliable sources. I also said that there may be a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. You just said that you are the producer; presumably you want that film to be a success. That is an interest other than making wikipedia a good encyclopedia and s that may be the conflict.-- +++$+++ :I didn't say [[The True Victory|it]] wasn't true. (I guess that's what you mean by "[[wikt:genuine|genuine]]") I'm not even saying it's not a worthwile project. (I have an opinion on that, but will keep it to myself.) (Other than that, I have no idea how a film could be "[[wikt:legitimate|illegimiate]]") I said it may not be [[wp:notability|notable]]. To be blunt, I'm not sure why anybody outside your church would give a wet slap about this film. And that's at least a part of of notability. Another part is having some idependant, reliable sources. I also said that there may be a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. You just said that you are the producer; presumably you want that film to be a success. That is an interest other than making wikipedia a good encyclopedia and s that may be the conflict.--[[User:Ospalh|ospalh]] ([[User talk:Ospalh#top|talk]]) 15:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
9218 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9216 +++$+++ 9217 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.246487700E09 +++$+++ I'll admit, I do want the film to be a success.  And I understand that some people may not agree with the message of the film (if that's what you meant).  What I meant by \"illegitimate\" was just those little movies that people make for fun... this film will have a limited theatrical release, which is why I have created an article for it.  +++$+++ ::I'll admit, I do want the film to be a success.  And I understand that some people may not agree with the message of the film (if that's what you meant).  What I meant by "illegitimate" was just those little movies that people make for fun... this film will have a limited theatrical release, which is why I have created an article for it. [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 15:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

533505 +++$+++ Zachorious +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533505 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-18 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.227022500E09 +++$+++ Hi I think you should remove the deletion notice from the [[Elementary School Musical]] page. If you look at the consensus it is overwhelmingly in the favor of keeping it. I am curious though, what prompted you to randomly put a deletion notice there? Doesn't it seem out of place to do that and not do the same thing with every other [[list of south park episodes|South Park episode]].  +++$+++ Hi I think you should remove the deletion notice from the [[Elementary School Musical]] page. If you look at the consensus it is overwhelmingly in the favor of keeping it. I am curious though, what prompted you to randomly put a deletion notice there? Doesn't it seem out of place to do that and not do the same thing with every other [[list of south park episodes|South Park episode]]. [[User:Zachorious|Zachorious]] ([[User talk:Zachorious|talk]]) 07:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
533506 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533505 +++$+++ 533505 +++$+++ 2008-11-18 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.227024720E09 +++$+++ Hi. I have already stated at the nomination page that I am withdrawing the nomination so any admin can close it. Some people still want to discuss the topic so it is still open... Anyway, have you read the nomination and saw my rationale there? --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I have already stated at the nomination page that I am withdrawing the nomination so any admin can close it. Some people still want to discuss the topic so it is still open... Anyway, have you read the nomination and saw my rationale there? --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
533507 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533505 +++$+++ 533505 +++$+++ 2008-11-18 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.227070260E09 +++$+++ Hi. I prefer answering here... The article was deleted in the prod process. Since you object, I have restored it, standard procedure. What you can improve in the article is to add some third party references, meaning other than club's website. Wikipedia articles should be verifiable. I hope this helps. Greetigs. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I prefer answering here... The article was deleted in the prod process. Since you object, I have restored it, standard procedure. What you can improve in the article is to add some third party references, meaning other than club's website. Wikipedia articles should be verifiable. I hope this helps. Greetigs. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
533508 +++$+++ Wjemather +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533505 +++$+++ 533507 +++$+++ 2008-11-19 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.227126600E09 +++$+++ Now listed on AfD &ndash; [[WP:Articles for deletion\/Kensington & Chelsea Cricket Club]].  +++$+++ ::Now listed on AfD &ndash; [[WP:Articles for deletion/Kensington & Chelsea Cricket Club]]. [[User:Wjemather|bigissue]] ([[User talk:Wjemather|talk]]) 12:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

9219 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-10 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.247256060E09 +++$+++ Hi. I\u2019m looking to add free-licensed photographs of the various season residences of MTV\u2019s ''[[The Real World]]'' to the articles for those seasons, so I\u2019m contacting editors whom it appears may live in or near those cities. Do you live in or near Venice Beach, and if so, would you be able to take some high-quality pics of the Los Angeles and\/or Hollywood residences and upload them [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Category:The_Real_World here] if I give you the location? If not, do you know anyone who can? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. I’m looking to add free-licensed photographs of the various season residences of MTV’s ''[[The Real World]]'' to the articles for those seasons, so I’m contacting editors whom it appears may live in or near those cities. Do you live in or near Venice Beach, and if so, would you be able to take some high-quality pics of the Los Angeles and/or Hollywood residences and upload them [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:The_Real_World here] if I give you the location? If not, do you know anyone who can? Thanks. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 13:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
9220 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9219 +++$+++ 9219 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.247257140E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, I won't be able to help you. Venice Beach is some 10,000&nbsp; from where I am. So I can't just hop into a car to take some photos there. [edit] I just made that edits to the Venice article because a) I was fixing misspellings of Ozzy Osbourne in a number of articles, b) that article was a false positive but c) tried to link to itself.-- +++$+++ :I'm sorry, I won't be able to help you. Venice Beach is some 10,000&nbsp; from where I am. So I can't just hop into a car to take some photos there. [edit] I just made that edits to the Venice article because a) I was fixing misspellings of Ozzy Osbourne in a number of articles, b) that article was a false positive but c) tried to link to itself.--[[User:Ospalh|ospalh]] ([[User talk:Ospalh#top|talk]]) 13:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

533509 +++$+++ Mr_Senseless +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533509 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-19 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.227101460E09 +++$+++ Hi, I saw you listed over at admin coaching, and was wondering if you'd be interested in taking on another student? ''' +++$+++ Hi, I saw you listed over at admin coaching, and was wondering if you'd be interested in taking on another student? '''[[User:Mr Senseless|Mister Senseless]]&trade;''' ([[User_talk:Mr Senseless|Speak]] - [[Special:Contributions/Mr_Senseless|Contributions]]) 05:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
533510 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533509 +++$+++ 533509 +++$+++ 2008-11-19 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.227113820E09 +++$+++ Hi. I am a bit busy in real life so I would prefer not to go into a full scale coaching but if you have any questions you are always welcome to ask and I'll try my best to help you out. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I am a bit busy in real life so I would prefer not to go into a full scale coaching but if you have any questions you are always welcome to ask and I'll try my best to help you out. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

271366 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-05 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.260074520E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I responded at the nom page, with the relevant quote from the cited source. ''' +++$+++ Thank you, I responded at the nom page, with the relevant quote from the cited source. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
271367 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271366 +++$+++ 271366 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.260075540E09 +++$+++ I corrected my mistake. Thanks, \u2014 +++$+++ :I corrected my mistake. Thanks, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:59, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

533511 +++$+++ 87.36.195.153 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533511 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-19 10:42:00 +++$+++ 1.227120120E09 +++$+++ While visiting the entry \"Irish Calendar\" I notice that the entry Last Light Ceremony was deleted in October on the grounds of not being important. I would suggest that any event that involved every single household in a particular country is indeed important. It was also an event unique to Ireland and therefore merits inclusion in the Irish Calendar.[[Special:Contributions\/87.36.195.153|87.36.195.153]] ( +++$+++ While visiting the entry "Irish Calendar" I notice that the entry Last Light Ceremony was deleted in October on the grounds of not being important. I would suggest that any event that involved every single household in a particular country is indeed important. It was also an event unique to Ireland and therefore merits inclusion in the Irish Calendar.[[Special:Contributions/87.36.195.153|87.36.195.153]] ([[User talk:87.36.195.153|talk]]) 10:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
533512 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533511 +++$+++ 533511 +++$+++ 2008-11-19 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.227125400E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process. Since you object, I will restore it. The problem with the article is that it has no references but there should not be too hard to find some. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process. Since you object, I will restore it. The problem with the article is that it has no references but there should not be too hard to find some. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

271368 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-02 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.259750640E09 +++$+++ Didn't pay too much attention to the edits, but I would like to know if you finished the copy-edits of Gin Tama. If not, no hurries. Take your time. Regards. +++$+++ Didn't pay too much attention to the edits, but I would like to know if you finished the copy-edits of Gin Tama. If not, no hurries. Take your time. Regards.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 02:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
271369 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271368 +++$+++ 271368 +++$+++ 2009-12-02 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.259822520E09 +++$+++ Yes, as I don't feel I know enough about the article to add much. I may copy edit it more, but don't worry about it. Good luck with it! (Did you notice that editor called {{user:Tintor4}}? Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Yes, as I don't feel I know enough about the article to add much. I may copy edit it more, but don't worry about it. Good luck with it! (Did you notice that editor called {{user:Tintor4}}? Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
271370 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271368 +++$+++ 271369 +++$+++ 2009-12-02 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.259824920E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that guy has nothing more interesting to do that creating lots of accounts just to undo my edits and make poor childish insults (and all of them are blocked). I'll see if I can nominate it to GA. Regards. +++$+++ ::Yeah, that guy has nothing more interesting to do that creating lots of accounts just to undo my edits and make poor childish insults (and all of them are blocked). I'll see if I can nominate it to GA. Regards.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 23:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
271371 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271368 +++$+++ 271369 +++$+++ 2009-12-07 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.260248580E09 +++$+++ Thanks. By the way the article is now a GA. +++$+++ ::Thanks. By the way the article is now a GA.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 21:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
271372 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271368 +++$+++ 271371 +++$+++ 2009-12-07 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.260249540E09 +++$+++ Congratulations. And well deserved! Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::Congratulations. And well deserved! Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:19, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

533513 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533513 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-19 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.227166860E09 +++$+++ I just noticed you deleted the britney image, could you take a look at the others I tagged for Britney Spears as well please. They are all suspect. \u2014  +++$+++ I just noticed you deleted the britney image, could you take a look at the others I tagged for Britney Spears as well please. They are all suspect. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 23:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
533514 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533513 +++$+++ 533513 +++$+++ 2008-11-19 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.227167220E09 +++$+++ Cheers, I'm not sure what you think of this one, [[:Image:Bspears marketing.jpg]], I've been a little more cautious here, I'm not usually one for copyright paranoia but... \u2014  +++$+++ :Cheers, I'm not sure what you think of this one, [[:Image:Bspears marketing.jpg]], I've been a little more cautious here, I'm not usually one for copyright paranoia but... — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 23:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
533515 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533513 +++$+++ 533514 +++$+++ 2008-11-19 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.227167340E09 +++$+++ This one is on Commons. The admins there should take care of it. What you can do with problematic images is that you remove them from the articles. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ :: This one is on Commons. The admins there should take care of it. What you can do with problematic images is that you remove them from the articles. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 23:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
533516 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533513 +++$+++ 533515 +++$+++ 2008-11-19 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.227167460E09 +++$+++ Yes, I've started doing that as this is a persistent problem, particularly with miss Spears for some reason. Anyone, thank you for you help. \u2014  +++$+++ :::Yes, I've started doing that as this is a persistent problem, particularly with miss Spears for some reason. Anyone, thank you for you help. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 23:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
533517 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533513 +++$+++ 533513 +++$+++ 2008-11-20 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.227202140E09 +++$+++ Hi. You can either apply for adminship yourself or someone else can nominate you, both at [[WP:RFA]]. In either case, you need to gain sufficient community support to be trusted admin tools. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. You can either apply for adminship yourself or someone else can nominate you, both at [[WP:RFA]]. In either case, you need to gain sufficient community support to be trusted admin tools. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

9226 +++$+++ Struway2 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-11 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.260559440E09 +++$+++ Hello. Your edits to [[1956 FA Cup Final]] changed page numbers used in Cite journal templates from the format <code>pages=pp.&nbsp;46\u201347<\/code> to just <code>pages=46\u201347<\/code>. This template doesn't supply the pp. automatically: as [[:Template:Cite Journal|the documentation]] mentions, it's correct to add the pp. manually if required. It ''is'' required in this article for consistency of reference formatting, particularly so as it's a [[WP:FA|featured article]] and expected to conform absolutely to the Manual of Style. I'll put them back. cheers,  +++$+++ Hello. Your edits to [[1956 FA Cup Final]] changed page numbers used in Cite journal templates from the format <code>pages=pp.&nbsp;46–47</code> to just <code>pages=46–47</code>. This template doesn't supply the pp. automatically: as [[:Template:Cite Journal|the documentation]] mentions, it's correct to add the pp. manually if required. It ''is'' required in this article for consistency of reference formatting, particularly so as it's a [[WP:FA|featured article]] and expected to conform absolutely to the Manual of Style. I'll put them back. cheers, [[User:Struway2|Struway2]] ([[User talk:Struway2|talk]]) 11:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
9227 +++$+++ Struway2 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9226 +++$+++ 9226 +++$+++ 2009-12-11 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.260561060E09 +++$+++ ''I'll put them back'' or I would have done if I hadn't been interrupted :-) thanks for reverting,  +++$+++ :''I'll put them back'' or I would have done if I hadn't been interrupted :-) thanks for reverting, [[User:Struway2|Struway2]] ([[User talk:Struway2|talk]]) 11:51, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

482135 +++$+++ Nareklm +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482135 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-25 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.164524160E09 +++$+++ I noticed alot of vandalism in the recent changes area im trying my hardest to mark the articles that are nonsense to be deleted but for the regular articles how do i revert?  +++$+++ I noticed alot of vandalism in the recent changes area im trying my hardest to mark the articles that are nonsense to be deleted but for the regular articles how do i revert? [[User:Nareklm|Nareklm]] 22:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
482136 +++$+++ Nareklm +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482135 +++$+++ 482135 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.164524760E09 +++$+++ Thanks man i needed that.  +++$+++ :Thanks man i needed that. [[User:Nareklm|Nareklm]] 23:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
482137 +++$+++ Nareklm +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482135 +++$+++ 482136 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.164525300E09 +++$+++ Just a tip for the last ten minutes i've been reverting spam and this guy is messing with alot of topics with his opinions.  +++$+++ ::Just a tip for the last ten minutes i've been reverting spam and this guy is messing with alot of topics with his opinions. [[User:Nareklm|Nareklm]] 23:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
482138 +++$+++ Nareklm +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482135 +++$+++ 482137 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.164525600E09 +++$+++ Thanks ill report more as i edit and revert spam (if there are any) :)  +++$+++ :::Thanks ill report more as i edit and revert spam (if there are any) :) [[User:Nareklm|Nareklm]] 23:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
482139 +++$+++ Nareklm +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482135 +++$+++ 482138 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.164531060E09 +++$+++ This person just blanked the tomato page and i reverted it looks suspicious... http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=72.153.193.76  +++$+++ ::::This person just blanked the tomato page and i reverted it looks suspicious... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=72.153.193.76 [[User:Nareklm|Nareklm]] 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
482140 +++$+++ Nareklm +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482135 +++$+++ 482139 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.164536880E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Hopefully i can get most people banned who are trouble makers and the ones who make stupid and immature posts continuously, well the spammers yep.  +++$+++ :::::Thanks, Hopefully i can get most people banned who are trouble makers and the ones who make stupid and immature posts continuously, well the spammers yep. [[User:Nareklm|Nareklm]] 02:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
482141 +++$+++ Nareklm +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482135 +++$+++ 482140 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.164537480E09 +++$+++ Yeah I've been cleaning out the recent changes and new pages so much today i reached 1059 edits, I've been adding stubs, WikiProjects, I reverted spam, im working to improve articles and eliminate non-sense material :-)  +++$+++ ::::::Yeah I've been cleaning out the recent changes and new pages so much today i reached 1059 edits, I've been adding stubs, WikiProjects, I reverted spam, im working to improve articles and eliminate non-sense material :-) [[User:Nareklm|Nareklm]] 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

9228 +++$+++ XLinkBot +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-22 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.261525800E09 +++$+++ Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page [[:Reaction Engines A2]] has been reverted.<br \/>Your edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?diff=333281158&oldid=333002843 here] was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our [[WP:EL|external links guideline]] from Wikipedia.  The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.  I removed the following link(s): 11.0@5.9 (matching the [[regex|regex rule]] (?<![^\\s:])[^\\s\\]\\[\\{\\}\\\\\\|^\\\/`<>@:]+@\\w+(?!\\.htm)(?:\\.\\w+){1,3}). It appears that you inserted an e-mail address to Reaction Engines A2.  Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information.  For more information, please read [[Wikipedia:BLP|Wikipedia:Biography of Living People]], specifically the section about [[Wikipedia:BLP#Privacy_of_personal_information|personal information]].<br \/>If you were trying to insert an [[Wikipedia:External links|external link]] that does comply with our [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]] and [[Wikipedia:List of guidelines|guidelines]], then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to [[WP:UNDO|undo]] the bot's revert.  However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link.  Please read Wikipedia's [[WP:EL|external links guideline]] for more information, and consult my [[User:XLinkBot\/Reversion reasons|list of frequently-reverted sites]]. For more information about me, see [[User:XLinkBot\/FAQ|my FAQ page]]. Thanks! -- +++$+++ Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page [[:Reaction Engines A2]] has been reverted.<br />Your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=333281158&oldid=333002843 here] was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our [[WP:EL|external links guideline]] from Wikipedia.  The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.  I removed the following link(s): 11.0@5.9 (matching the [[regex|regex rule]] (?<![^\s:])[^\s\]\[\{\}\\\|^\/`<>@:]+@\w+(?!\.htm)(?:\.\w+){1,3}). It appears that you inserted an e-mail address to Reaction Engines A2.  Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information.  For more information, please read [[Wikipedia:BLP|Wikipedia:Biography of Living People]], specifically the section about [[Wikipedia:BLP#Privacy_of_personal_information|personal information]].<br />If you were trying to insert an [[Wikipedia:External links|external link]] that does comply with our [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]] and [[Wikipedia:List of guidelines|guidelines]], then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to [[WP:UNDO|undo]] the bot's revert.  However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link.  Please read Wikipedia's [[WP:EL|external links guideline]] for more information, and consult my [[User:XLinkBot/Reversion reasons|list of frequently-reverted sites]]. For more information about me, see [[User:XLinkBot/FAQ|my FAQ page]]. Thanks! --[[User:XLinkBot|XLinkBot]] ([[User talk:XLinkBot|talk]]) 15:50, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
9229 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9228 +++$+++ 9228 +++$+++ 2009-12-22 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.261527240E09 +++$+++ \"11.0@5.9\" may trigger the regex for an email address, but it isn't one. And [[Reaction Engines A2]] isn't about a living person. (Rather about some [[vapourware]] airliner.) False positive.-- +++$+++ :"11.0@5.9" may trigger the regex for an email address, but it isn't one. And [[Reaction Engines A2]] isn't about a living person. (Rather about some [[vapourware]] airliner.) False positive.--[[User:Ospalh|ospalh]] ([[User talk:Ospalh#top|talk]]) 16:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

271373 +++$+++ Literaturegeek  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271373 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-06 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.260093720E09 +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, thanks for tagging that [[delorazepam]] article, I shall try and add some refs to it over the coming days. I have been meaning for some time to apologise to you for biting your head off that time on the benzo FAC. I made a comment which was a personal attack and it was over the top and you didn't deserve it. All I can say was I had multiple disputes going on, [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/ADHD|ADHD arbcom]], major benzo dispute, harassed by [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/Mwalla|Mwalla sockpuppets]] and I was at boiling point, you made some posts which I found not fair and I grossly over-reacted. I delayed apologising to you as I figured that it would not look sincere as I was in an arbcom at the time and thought that you might take it as me trying to make myself look good. This is the season of goodwill so from me to you I sincerely apologise and hope that you accept my honest apology and understand things from my perspective. :)-- +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, thanks for tagging that [[delorazepam]] article, I shall try and add some refs to it over the coming days. I have been meaning for some time to apologise to you for biting your head off that time on the benzo FAC. I made a comment which was a personal attack and it was over the top and you didn't deserve it. All I can say was I had multiple disputes going on, [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/ADHD|ADHD arbcom]], major benzo dispute, harassed by [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mwalla|Mwalla sockpuppets]] and I was at boiling point, you made some posts which I found not fair and I grossly over-reacted. I delayed apologising to you as I figured that it would not look sincere as I was in an arbcom at the time and thought that you might take it as me trying to make myself look good. This is the season of goodwill so from me to you I sincerely apologise and hope that you accept my honest apology and understand things from my perspective. :)--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 02:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
271374 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271373 +++$+++ 271373 +++$+++ 2009-12-06 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.260094020E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much for apologizing. It is gratefully  accepted. I very much appreciate that you took the time to do so. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Thank you so much for apologizing. It is gratefully  accepted. I very much appreciate that you took the time to do so. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
271375 +++$+++ Literaturegeek  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271373 +++$+++ 271374 +++$+++ 2009-12-07 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.260250740E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome and thank you for accepting. Happy editing and see you around wikipedia. :-)-- +++$+++ ::You are very welcome and thank you for accepting. Happy editing and see you around wikipedia. :-)--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 21:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

611340 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611340 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-14 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.295000040E09 +++$+++ I'm almost terrified to look at your contributions, but I just came across [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Collapsing_Opposites&action=historysubmit&diff=405774482&oldid=405759103 this] edit. How many reliable sources do you actually want? No way does that fail A7, and I strongly, strongly doubt it would be deleted at AfD. The article now has bordering on a ridiculous number of sources, and it was sitting there languishing because you'd declined it...  +++$+++ I'm almost terrified to look at your contributions, but I just came across [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collapsing_Opposites&action=historysubmit&diff=405774482&oldid=405759103 this] edit. How many reliable sources do you actually want? No way does that fail A7, and I strongly, strongly doubt it would be deleted at AfD. The article now has bordering on a ridiculous number of sources, and it was sitting there languishing because you'd declined it... [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 02:14, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
611341 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611340 +++$+++ 611340 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.295001060E09 +++$+++ Looking at it, it looks like I'm becomming too exclusionist in a way and being overly cautious. See above for what happened but I unintentionally declined it that time after pledging not to touch it. That was my fault and I feel horrible for breaking that promise. Sorry for that.  +++$+++ :Looking at it, it looks like I'm becomming too exclusionist in a way and being overly cautious. See above for what happened but I unintentionally declined it that time after pledging not to touch it. That was my fault and I feel horrible for breaking that promise. Sorry for that. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 02:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

533519 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-21 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.227281340E09 +++$+++ Could you please restore [[Fzoul Chembryl]] for me? If you like, you can redirect it to [[List of Forgotten Realms characters]].  Thanks! :)  +++$+++ Could you please restore [[Fzoul Chembryl]] for me? If you like, you can redirect it to [[List of Forgotten Realms characters]].  Thanks! :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 07:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
533520 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.227283560E09 +++$+++ Redirect created. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Redirect created. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
533521 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 533520 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.227300000E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Could you please restore the edit history prior to the redirect? I'm sure we would like to merge the text into a characters article in the near future.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. Could you please restore the edit history prior to the redirect? I'm sure we would like to merge the text into a characters article in the near future. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 12:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
533522 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 533521 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.227301500E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :)  +++$+++ :::Thanks! :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 13:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
533523 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.227381000E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process. This means that it can be restored without problems. Shall I do this? Still, someone can nominate it for deletion afterwards. Tell me what you think. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process. This means that it can be restored without problems. Shall I do this? Still, someone can nominate it for deletion afterwards. Tell me what you think. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
533524 +++$+++ Radiohead2468 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 533523 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.227389100E09 +++$+++ Thank you, if the article can be restored without problems, then I will try to edit it to the point where it won't be nominated for deletion going forward.  - Mary  +++$+++ :: Thank you, if the article can be restored without problems, then I will try to edit it to the point where it won't be nominated for deletion going forward.  - Mary [[User:Radiohead2468|Radiohead2468]] ([[User talk:Radiohead2468|talk]]) 13:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
533525 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 533524 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.227395040E09 +++$+++ We were talking about Damian D ressick, right? Restored now. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ ::: We were talking about Damian D ressick, right? Restored now. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
533526 +++$+++ Radiohead2468 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 533525 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.227432660E09 +++$+++ That's right.  Many thanks.  For what it's worth, the (\"non-notable\") person who rec'd the author page for deletion did it I assume because I edited a page [[Oliver Building (Pittsburgh)]] to remove a picture of a Cantini painting that he claims to have taken in the lobby of the office building where I've worked for over 20 years. The Cantini painting has never been in the Oliver Building and is (or was--I don't claim to know where it is, just where it isn't) in a different building. Does Wikipedia have a way of dealing with retributory (if that's a word) delete rec's?  - Mary  +++$+++ ::::That's right.  Many thanks.  For what it's worth, the ("non-notable") person who rec'd the author page for deletion did it I assume because I edited a page [[Oliver Building (Pittsburgh)]] to remove a picture of a Cantini painting that he claims to have taken in the lobby of the office building where I've worked for over 20 years. The Cantini painting has never been in the Oliver Building and is (or was--I don't claim to know where it is, just where it isn't) in a different building. Does Wikipedia have a way of dealing with retributory (if that's a word) delete rec's?  - Mary [[User:Radiohead2468|Radiohead2468]] ([[User talk:Radiohead2468|talk]]) 01:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
533527 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 533526 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.227469620E09 +++$+++ I am not completely sure what you mean by ''retributory delete rec's''... Please explain and I can probably help you out ;-) --''' +++$+++ ::::: I am not completely sure what you mean by ''retributory delete rec's''... Please explain and I can probably help you out ;-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
533528 +++$+++ Radiohead2468 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 533527 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.227479580E09 +++$+++ I don't know what the term for this would be - Say I edit a page to correct an error, and the person who made the original error takes offense at the correction. He looks up my contributions and recommends a page I initiated for deletion. (He includes some nasty remarks in the talk page as well.) Does WP have a term for this, or a policy regarding it? - Mary  +++$+++ ::::::I don't know what the term for this would be - Say I edit a page to correct an error, and the person who made the original error takes offense at the correction. He looks up my contributions and recommends a page I initiated for deletion. (He includes some nasty remarks in the talk page as well.) Does WP have a term for this, or a policy regarding it? - Mary [[User:Radiohead2468|Radiohead2468]] ([[User talk:Radiohead2468|talk]]) 14:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
533529 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 533528 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.227482340E09 +++$+++ Hm, sounds like some kind of stalking... This is not a nice behaviour but I wouldn't judge from one case only. Maybe it was just a coincidence. If this happens again, don't take it personal and report it to an admin. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ ::::::: Hm, sounds like some kind of stalking... This is not a nice behaviour but I wouldn't judge from one case only. Maybe it was just a coincidence. If this happens again, don't take it personal and report it to an admin. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:19, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
533530 +++$+++ Radiohead2468 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533519 +++$+++ 533529 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.227488940E09 +++$+++ Understood. Many thanks again.  - Mary  +++$+++ :::::::: Understood. Many thanks again.  - Mary [[User:Radiohead2468|Radiohead2468]] ([[User talk:Radiohead2468|talk]]) 17:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

9232 +++$+++ Tomeasy +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-02 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.272821220E09 +++$+++ Hi. Please see my reply to your post. Perhaps you can indicate in <s>this<\/s>the article's talk page section where you found the reported statement in your source.  +++$+++ Hi. Please see my reply to your post. Perhaps you can indicate in <s>this</s>the article's talk page section where you found the reported statement in your source. [[User:Tomeasy|<span style="color:#0000f1;font-family:Papyrus;cursor:help">'''''T<font color="#009ef2">om<font color="#6bd5f5">ea</font>s</font>y'''''</span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Tomeasy| T]][[Special:Contributions/Tomeasy| C]]</sub> 10:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
9233 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9232 +++$+++ 9232 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.272828480E09 +++$+++ \"(...) in this talk page section (...)\" Oh well. Guess should have read that more carefully. I've responded on the [[Talk:Deutsche_Mark#Coin_obverse_and_reverse|article talk page]].-- +++$+++ :"(...) in this talk page section (...)" Oh well. Guess should have read that more carefully. I've responded on the [[Talk:Deutsche_Mark#Coin_obverse_and_reverse|article talk page]].--[[User:Ospalh|ospalh]] ([[User talk:Ospalh#top|talk]]) 12:28, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
9234 +++$+++ Tomeasy +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9232 +++$+++ 9233 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.272830580E09 +++$+++ Well done, that's actually what I meant.  +++$+++ ::Well done, that's actually what I meant. [[User:Tomeasy|<span style="color:#0000f1;font-family:Papyrus;cursor:help">'''''T<font color="#009ef2">om<font color="#6bd5f5">ea</font>s</font>y'''''</span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Tomeasy| T]][[Special:Contributions/Tomeasy| C]]</sub> 13:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

271378 +++$+++ Ucucha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-08 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.260265800E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I noticed a few DYK hooks that you rejected because they were too short, but that had been moved from userspace recently. According to [[WP:DYKFN|rule F3]], an article still counts as new if it has been in userspace before. Just a friendly reminder for the future.  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I noticed a few DYK hooks that you rejected because they were too short, but that had been moved from userspace recently. According to [[WP:DYKFN|rule F3]], an article still counts as new if it has been in userspace before. Just a friendly reminder for the future. [[User talk:Ucucha|Ucucha]] 01:50, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
271379 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271378 +++$+++ 271378 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.260265980E09 +++$+++ Isn't too short the same whether they have been move from userspace or not? Too short is under 1500 characters, regardless of the article history. Is this not true?  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Isn't too short the same whether they have been move from userspace or not? Too short is under 1500 characters, regardless of the article history. Is this not true?  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:53, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
271380 +++$+++ Ucucha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271378 +++$+++ 271379 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.260267180E09 +++$+++ I may not have been as clear as I should have been. Take [[Naval Reserve Armory]] as an example. This is currently 1992 b (enough) and was moved from userspace on Dec 3, but you [[T:TDYK#Naval Reserve Armory|rejected it]] because it was not expanded fivefold.  +++$+++ ::I may not have been as clear as I should have been. Take [[Naval Reserve Armory]] as an example. This is currently 1992 b (enough) and was moved from userspace on Dec 3, but you [[T:TDYK#Naval Reserve Armory|rejected it]] because it was not expanded fivefold. [[User talk:Ucucha|Ucucha]] 02:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
271381 +++$+++ Ucucha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271378 +++$+++ 271380 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.260267660E09 +++$+++ Well, that's a bit of an overreaction. I quite appreciate your contributions to reviewing DYKs; I just wanted to note a rule you may not have been aware of. I hope you'll keep reviewing in the future.  +++$+++ :::Well, that's a bit of an overreaction. I quite appreciate your contributions to reviewing DYKs; I just wanted to note a rule you may not have been aware of. I hope you'll keep reviewing in the future. [[User talk:Ucucha|Ucucha]] 02:21, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

263683 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-28 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.154124360E09 +++$+++ Your probably best taking this image to IfD [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Charlotte_Morgan_%28The_O.C.%29.jpg] as it has been superceeded by a new much better version. :-) <font face=\"Tahoma\" size=\"1\"><font color=\"#C11B17\">Matthew<\/font> <b><font color=\"#3366ff\"> +++$+++ Your probably best taking this image to IfD [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Charlotte_Morgan_%28The_O.C.%29.jpg] as it has been superceeded by a new much better version. :-) <font face="Tahoma" size="1"><font color="#C11B17">Matthew</font> <b><font color="#3366ff">[[User_talk:MatthewFenton|Fenton]] (</font></b><font color="#356468">[[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|contribs]]</font><font color="#3366ff"><b>)</b></font></font> 15:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263684 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263683 +++$+++ 263683 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.154124480E09 +++$+++ It's OK tagged as orphan -- it'll be deleted naturally in a week (prob the same as IFD). You're absolutely right that my images should have fair use rationales, and I'll strive to add them. There's loads of ''O.C.'' images without rationales tho'.  +++$+++ :It's OK tagged as orphan -- it'll be deleted naturally in a week (prob the same as IFD). You're absolutely right that my images should have fair use rationales, and I'll strive to add them. There's loads of ''O.C.'' images without rationales tho'. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
263685 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263683 +++$+++ 263683 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.154124780E09 +++$+++ I personaly havent gone thru the images my self, but i would my self be willing to add fair use rationales and provide images for those without source info. <font face=\"Tahoma\" size=\"1\"><font color=\"#C11B17\">Matthew<\/font> <b><font color=\"#3366ff\"> +++$+++ :I personaly havent gone thru the images my self, but i would my self be willing to add fair use rationales and provide images for those without source info. <font face="Tahoma" size="1"><font color="#C11B17">Matthew</font> <b><font color="#3366ff">[[User_talk:MatthewFenton|Fenton]] (</font></b><font color="#356468">[[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|contribs]]</font><font color="#3366ff"><b>)</b></font></font> 15:13, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

9236 +++$+++ SamBlob +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-07 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.281233340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:SamBlob|Sincerely, SamBlob]] ([[User talk:SamBlob|talk]]) 19:09, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
9237 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9236 +++$+++ 9236 +++$+++ 2010-08-07 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.281239520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that ... message. (I thought we should [[WP:BOLD|be bold]].) And actually i ''do'' have a [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles\/Conventions#(More) Displacement, cc, cm3 and the SI|problem]] with that guideline.-- +++$+++ :Thanks for that ... message. (I thought we should [[WP:BOLD|be bold]].) And actually i ''do'' have a [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles/Conventions#(More) Displacement, cc, cm3 and the SI|problem]] with that guideline.--[[User:Ospalh|ospalh]] ([[User talk:Ospalh#top|talk]]) 20:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

9238 +++$+++ Junuxx +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-22 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.287809520E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I encountered a page where this (apparently sensible) correction you made was not justified, on the page [[Germanic name]] where 'eg' was listed as a typical prefix of a Germanic name (e.g. Egbert). I have corrected it. This is probably a rare situation, but you might want to double-check the other edits made with that AWB rule. Regards,  +++$+++ Hi there. I encountered a page where this (apparently sensible) correction you made was not justified, on the page [[Germanic name]] where 'eg' was listed as a typical prefix of a Germanic name (e.g. Egbert). I have corrected it. This is probably a rare situation, but you might want to double-check the other edits made with that AWB rule. Regards, [[User:Junuxx|Junuxx]] ([[User talk:Junuxx|talk]]) 21:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
9239 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9238 +++$+++ 9238 +++$+++ 2010-10-22 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.287811440E09 +++$+++ Oops. Thanks for catching that. I'll try to be more careful in the future. There are lots of chances for false positives with all those rules. (And shouldn't that be spelled \"eg E.g.bert\"?  \u30c4 )  +++$+++ :Oops. Thanks for catching that. I'll try to be more careful in the future. There are lots of chances for false positives with all those rules. (And shouldn't that be spelled "eg E.g.bert"?  ツ ) [[User:Ospalh|ospalh]] ([[User talk:Ospalh#top|talk]]) 22:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

9240 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-24 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.306253040E09 +++$+++ Why are you changing [[Bela Lugosi]] to B\xe9la Lugosi? While he may be known in his home country with the diacritcal, his greatest fame came in the U.S., where he did not use it. The WP article is at \"Bela Lugosi\". Please explain your reasoning. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ Why are you changing [[Bela Lugosi]] to Béla Lugosi? While he may be known in his home country with the diacritcal, his greatest fame came in the U.S., where he did not use it. The WP article is at "Bela Lugosi". Please explain your reasoning. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 09:04, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
9241 +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9240 +++$+++ 9240 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.306259220E09 +++$+++ The main reason was that the page ''was'' at [[B\xe9la Lugosi]] until [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=B%C3%A9la+Lugosi&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1 May 5]. I guess i should stop. +++$+++ :The main reason was that the page ''was'' at [[Béla Lugosi]] until [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=B%C3%A9la+Lugosi&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1 May 5]. I guess i should stop.[[User:Ospalh|ospalh]] ([[User talk:Ospalh#top|talk]]) 10:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
9242 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Ospalh +++$+++ 9240 +++$+++ 9241 +++$+++ 2011-05-25 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.306331700E09 +++$+++ They say if you don't like the weather in London just wait five minutes, when it'll change. I suppose that's a bit like Wikipedia. Nothing stays the same for long. I've quoted policies only to find they've been changed since I'd last read them. It happens to all of us. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::They say if you don't like the weather in London just wait five minutes, when it'll change. I suppose that's a bit like Wikipedia. Nothing stays the same for long. I've quoted policies only to find they've been changed since I'd last read them. It happens to all of us. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 06:55, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

533531 +++$+++ Radiojon +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-21 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.227332700E09 +++$+++ I must '''very strongly''' object to your deletion of [[WNYT (internet radio)]] .  It is a legitimate [[college radio]] station from a legitimate [[college]] ([[NYIT]]).  It has been so for '''over 40 years''' on [[carrier current]], [[cable radio]], and [[Internet radio]].  The only reason it is not an [[over-the-air]] [[radio station]] is because it is in the jam-packed [[media market]] of [[greater New York]], where any [[frequency allotment]]s were taken decades ago. Please restore this page. &nbsp;&ndash; +++$+++ I must '''very strongly''' object to your deletion of [[WNYT (internet radio)]] .  It is a legitimate [[college radio]] station from a legitimate [[college]] ([[NYIT]]).  It has been so for '''over 40 years''' on [[carrier current]], [[cable radio]], and [[Internet radio]].  The only reason it is not an [[over-the-air]] [[radio station]] is because it is in the jam-packed [[media market]] of [[greater New York]], where any [[frequency allotment]]s were taken decades ago. Please restore this page. &nbsp;&ndash;[[User:Radiojon|radiojon]] ([[User talk:Radiojon|talk]]) 21:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
533532 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533531 +++$+++ 533531 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.227381000E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process. Since you object, I will restore it and send it to afd in order to get a community consensus. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process. Since you object, I will restore it and send it to afd in order to get a community consensus. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
533533 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533531 +++$+++ 533531 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.227381000E09 +++$+++ Hi. Sorry, but I think the article was not encyclopedic. Articles need to assert a certain notability but this one was just a list of commercially avaialble products. And the rest of it was written in an advertizing manner. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Sorry, but I think the article was not encyclopedic. Articles need to assert a certain notability but this one was just a list of commercially avaialble products. And the rest of it was written in an advertizing manner. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

9244 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-18 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.174213140E09 +++$+++ Well, the info that you added just seemed to be a repetition of [[Gedhun Choekyi Nyima]] and [[Qoigyijabu]]. While I appreciate your efforts, it appeared to be redundant with the info that we already had. <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ Well, the info that you added just seemed to be a repetition of [[Gedhun Choekyi Nyima]] and [[Qoigyijabu]]. While I appreciate your efforts, it appeared to be redundant with the info that we already had. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 03:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
9245 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9244 +++$+++ 9244 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.174213680E09 +++$+++ But the details can already be found in the relevant articles. The [[Panchen Lama]] article is only supposed to give a general overview\/summary, and not get into too many specific details. <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :But the details can already be found in the relevant articles. The [[Panchen Lama]] article is only supposed to give a general overview/summary, and not get into too many specific details. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 03:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
9246 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9244 +++$+++ 9245 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.174214580E09 +++$+++ See [[WP:ATT]]. <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ ::See [[WP:ATT]]. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 03:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
9247 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9244 +++$+++ 9246 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.174228920E09 +++$+++ I don't think it's necessary, but if you insist on having it, at least make it NPOV. <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :::I don't think it's necessary, but if you insist on having it, at least make it NPOV. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 07:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

88922 +++$+++ JLogan +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88922 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-31 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.188570240E09 +++$+++ Ah fantastic, I didn't see them when I was searching which is why I created the taskforce. However, how active are they? Given I had trouble finding them there hasn't been much activity on their talk pages of late - are you saying they should be merged into the taskforces or the taskforce merged into the project because its members are active behind the scenes still? Thanks. - '' +++$+++ Ah fantastic, I didn't see them when I was searching which is why I created the taskforce. However, how active are they? Given I had trouble finding them there hasn't been much activity on their talk pages of late - are you saying they should be merged into the taskforces or the taskforce merged into the project because its members are active behind the scenes still? Thanks. - ''[[User:JLogan|J Logan]] <sup>[[User talk:JLogan|t]]</sup>'': 07:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
88923 +++$+++ JLogan +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88922 +++$+++ 88922 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.188624840E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. You might want to get some project banners though for visability. If you need to use anything on WP:EUR you're free to. Good luck. I'll remove the taskforce pages shortly. - '' +++$+++ :Fair enough. You might want to get some project banners though for visability. If you need to use anything on WP:EUR you're free to. Good luck. I'll remove the taskforce pages shortly. - ''[[User:JLogan|J Logan]] <sup>[[User talk:JLogan|t]]</sup>'': 22:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

533534 +++$+++ 71.96.67.224 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-23 05:50:00 +++$+++ 1.227448200E09 +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions\/71.96.67.224|71.96.67.224]] ( +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions/71.96.67.224|71.96.67.224]] ([[User talk:71.96.67.224|talk]]) 05:50, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
533535 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533534 +++$+++ 533534 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.227469620E09 +++$+++ You see, the article would then need a complete rewrite. I invite you to do this. And remember, WP is an encyclopedia, not a directory. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : You see, the article would then need a complete rewrite. I invite you to do this. And remember, WP is an encyclopedia, not a directory. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
533536 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533534 +++$+++ 533534 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.251335640E09 +++$+++ [[WP:OTHERSTUFF]]. I hope this helps... --''' +++$+++ : [[WP:OTHERSTUFF]]. I hope this helps... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
533537 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533534 +++$+++ 533534 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.227395160E09 +++$+++ Hi. You should have removed the delete template when you fixed the article... Anyway, I restored it now. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. You should have removed the delete template when you fixed the article... Anyway, I restored it now. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
533538 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533534 +++$+++ 533534 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.227469620E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was not written in encyclopedic manner and it had no refrences. What it needs is a complete rewrite. I invite you to do it. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was not written in encyclopedic manner and it had no refrences. What it needs is a complete rewrite. I invite you to do it. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

533539 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533539 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-23 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.227511920E09 +++$+++ although not properly referenced, I think its a famous model of boat. I was in the process of declining the speedy when you deleted it. Please undelete, and, since I suppose you do think its not a sustainable article, send to afd, where we can get consensus. ''' +++$+++ although not properly referenced, I think its a famous model of boat. I was in the process of declining the speedy when you deleted it. Please undelete, and, since I suppose you do think its not a sustainable article, send to afd, where we can get consensus. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 23:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
533540 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533539 +++$+++ 533539 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.227512100E09 +++$+++ Hm, probably you're right. I'll restore it and leave it for a while, maybe it gets expanded after all. It still needs a rewrite. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hm, probably you're right. I'll restore it and leave it for a while, maybe it gets expanded after all. It still needs a rewrite. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 23:35, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

533541 +++$+++ Galaga88 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-24 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.227594840E09 +++$+++ Hello Tone, I would like to contest the deletion of Spdfgh. The band is out of notable history as an all girl group during the late 90s, and with several of the members going on to be involved in successful music groups Via Tania and Sister She.  +++$+++ Hello Tone, I would like to contest the deletion of Spdfgh. The band is out of notable history as an all girl group during the late 90s, and with several of the members going on to be involved in successful music groups Via Tania and Sister She. [[User:Galaga88|Galaga88]] ([[User talk:Galaga88|talk]]) 22:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
533542 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 2008-11-24 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.227595860E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. You may want to fix the remaining issues with the article. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. You may want to fix the remaining issues with the article. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
533543 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 2008-11-25 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.227649920E09 +++$+++ Hi. I can't find the article in my deletion log. Can you provide me the exact title? I'll have a look then. Thanks. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I can't find the article in my deletion log. Can you provide me the exact title? I'll have a look then. Thanks. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:52, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
533544 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 533543 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.227829920E09 +++$+++ Aha, found it. Now it is restored. Please, fix the issues so that it does not get deleted again. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ :: Aha, found it. Now it is restored. Please, fix the issues so that it does not get deleted again. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
533545 +++$+++ AnmaFinotera +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 533544 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.227835380E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure why this was restored. It was PRODed, the prod remained for the approrpiate length of time, and NOTHING was done to address any of those issues. They had plenty of time to fix it. It does not meet the necessary guidelines, and nothing in the IPs claims change this issue. --  +++$+++ :::I'm not sure why this was restored. It was PRODed, the prod remained for the approrpiate length of time, and NOTHING was done to address any of those issues. They had plenty of time to fix it. It does not meet the necessary guidelines, and nothing in the IPs claims change this issue. -- [[User:AnmaFinotera|<span style='font-family: "Comic Sans MS"; color:#5342F'>AnmaFinotera</span>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:AnmaFinotera|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/AnmaFinotera|contribs]]) 17:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
533546 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 533545 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.227836760E09 +++$+++ I usually restore contested prods unless there is a very solid reason. Some of the articles I then send to AfD. This article may be a case for AfD, as well. --''' +++$+++ :::: I usually restore contested prods unless there is a very solid reason. Some of the articles I then send to AfD. This article may be a case for AfD, as well. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
533547 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 2008-11-25 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.227649920E09 +++$+++ Hi. The reason that there are other similar articles is not really a criteria why a specific article should exist. Anyway, because the article was deleted as a prod, I'll restore it. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The reason that there are other similar articles is not really a criteria why a specific article should exist. Anyway, because the article was deleted as a prod, I'll restore it. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:52, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
533548 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.227813900E09 +++$+++ While the article was maybe not intended to be an advert, it contained no assertion of notability and no references, therefore no reason why this article should exist. Just some description of the product is not enough. I hope this helps. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : While the article was maybe not intended to be an advert, it contained no assertion of notability and no references, therefore no reason why this article should exist. Just some description of the product is not enough. I hope this helps. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
533549 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.227813900E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. This was a prod deletion so the reason was given by the nominator, not me. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. This was a prod deletion so the reason was given by the nominator, not me. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
533550 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 533541 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.227813900E09 +++$+++ Restored and sent to AfD to gain community consensus. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Restored and sent to AfD to gain community consensus. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

9254 +++$+++ Woogie10w +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.174464060E09 +++$+++ Can anyone provide authoriative information on China's civilian losses in WW2 1937-45?--[[User:Berndd11222|Berndd11222]] 23:32, 26 November 2005 (UTC)  -- +++$+++ Can anyone provide authoriative information on China's civilian losses in WW2 1937-45?--[[User:Berndd11222|Berndd11222]] 23:32, 26 November 2005 (UTC)  --[[User:Woogie10w|Woogie10w]] 01:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
9255 +++$+++ Woogie10w +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9254 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.174764060E09 +++$+++ You are right, I think the number should be 20 million based on the data you posted from the China Academy of Science. In any case the English language source R. J. Rummel will back up the 20 million. What do think abou that?-- +++$+++ ::You are right, I think the number should be 20 million based on the data you posted from the China Academy of Science. In any case the English language source R. J. Rummel will back up the 20 million. What do think abou that?--[[User:Woogie10w|Woogie10w]] 12:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
9256 +++$+++ Woogie10w +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9254 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.174764960E09 +++$+++ Thank you, maybe if you have the time to provide a Chinese source. I think it would be better than R.J. Rummel-- +++$+++ :::Thank you, maybe if you have the time to provide a Chinese source. I think it would be better than R.J. Rummel--[[User:Woogie10w|Woogie10w]] 12:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
9257 +++$+++ Woogie10w +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9254 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.175037660E09 +++$+++ This is a great film, real powerful.[[Devils on the Doorstep]].-- +++$+++ ::::This is a great film, real powerful.[[Devils on the Doorstep]].--[[User:Woogie10w|Woogie10w]] 16:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
9258 +++$+++ wbfergus +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9254 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.182881160E09 +++$+++ Kysrie, you have violated the 3RR for the [[Korean War]]. See [[WP:AN\/3RR]]  +++$+++ ::::: Kysrie, you have violated the 3RR for the [[Korean War]]. See [[WP:AN/3RR]] [[User:wbfergus|wbfergus]] 11:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

271400 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-07 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.260244020E09 +++$+++ Dear Mattisse - your current trajectory at the Request for Clarification is taking you right in the direction of another block. You overreacted to Jooperscoopers post without consulting with your advisors (as far as I am aware), and are now acting as if you think you can solve Wikipedia's problems. You have to trust Arbitrators to make good decisions. Restrict your comments purely to clarifications of questions by other editors, and stop trying to make a point, or you will be blocked to prevent further disruption of process. '' +++$+++ Dear Mattisse - your current trajectory at the Request for Clarification is taking you right in the direction of another block. You overreacted to Jooperscoopers post without consulting with your advisors (as far as I am aware), and are now acting as if you think you can solve Wikipedia's problems. You have to trust Arbitrators to make good decisions. Restrict your comments purely to clarifications of questions by other editors, and stop trying to make a point, or you will be blocked to prevent further disruption of process. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 19:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
271401 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271400 +++$+++ 271400 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.260300300E09 +++$+++ Sometimes all that is needed is a pause for thought. Too much damage is done by people responding too quickly (and emotionally rather than rationally) to rather minor edits. I have asked Joopercoopers for a fuller explanation for the reason for that user's frustration. If Joopercoopers shows good reason for the frustration, then you and I will need to discuss how best to deal with this particular incident and how to prevent it in future. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :Sometimes all that is needed is a pause for thought. Too much damage is done by people responding too quickly (and emotionally rather than rationally) to rather minor edits. I have asked Joopercoopers for a fuller explanation for the reason for that user's frustration. If Joopercoopers shows good reason for the frustration, then you and I will need to discuss how best to deal with this particular incident and how to prevent it in future. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 11:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
271402 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271400 +++$+++ 271401 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.260334980E09 +++$+++ I fully support the above, and consequently have blocked you for posting to [[WP:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification]] without consultation subsequent to this warning. Given that your post was a minor update, I have only blocked you for 12 hours. However, your post was also indicative of a problem: that you believe your latest editing statistics are relevant to the case. If you had consulted advisors, we would have told you to stop making such updates. The arbitration case is about disruption, and avoiding it in the future, not about numbers of edits. '' +++$+++ :: I fully support the above, and consequently have blocked you for posting to [[WP:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification]] without consultation subsequent to this warning. Given that your post was a minor update, I have only blocked you for 12 hours. However, your post was also indicative of a problem: that you believe your latest editing statistics are relevant to the case. If you had consulted advisors, we would have told you to stop making such updates. The arbitration case is about disruption, and avoiding it in the future, not about numbers of edits. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 21:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
271403 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271400 +++$+++ 271402 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.260337740E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Geometry guy. I fully recognize my ridiculous achievements on Wikipedia are laughable. Didn't think that pointing out my stupid achievements were worthy of a block. But you know best. I think that after diminishing an editor's self esteem, you cannot expect that editor to ever edit again with confidence. I surely will not ever feel able again to believe that I have anything to add to this encyclopedia.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::Thank you, Geometry guy. I fully recognize my ridiculous achievements on Wikipedia are laughable. Didn't think that pointing out my stupid achievements were worthy of a block. But you know best. I think that after diminishing an editor's self esteem, you cannot expect that editor to ever edit again with confidence. I surely will not ever feel able again to believe that I have anything to add to this encyclopedia.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
271404 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271400 +++$+++ 271403 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.260339420E09 +++$+++ Which part of \"''I am warning you not to make ANY further comments, amendments or edits to the Request for Clarification without having first consulted with an advisor. If you do make a comment, amendment or edit to the Request for Clarification without having first consulted with an advisor, then I will block you for 24 hours.''\" did you not understand? I am extending your block to 24 hours per SilkTork's warning. '' +++$+++ ::::Which part of "''I am warning you not to make ANY further comments, amendments or edits to the Request for Clarification without having first consulted with an advisor. If you do make a comment, amendment or edit to the Request for Clarification without having first consulted with an advisor, then I will block you for 24 hours.''" did you not understand? I am extending your block to 24 hours per SilkTork's warning. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 22:17, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
271405 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271400 +++$+++ 271404 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.260341100E09 +++$+++ Just because you have a block does not mean that we do not appreciate your work on wikipedia, its just that we need to prevent another incident exploding, and the only way that seems to be achievable is with a short block. Hopefully being a bit calmer in a day will help. -- +++$+++ :::::Just because you have a block does not mean that we do not appreciate your work on wikipedia, its just that we need to prevent another incident exploding, and the only way that seems to be achievable is with a short block. Hopefully being a bit calmer in a day will help. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]): 22:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
271406 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271400 +++$+++ 271405 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.260342480E09 +++$+++ For the record, I disagree with this block, as I do with the 'any edit' sanction placed by SilkTork above. Asking Mattisse not to comment further on the joopercoopers incident without advice is appropriate but asking her not to edit at all in the request for clarification is not. However, since I did not weigh in earlier (I did see silktork's note but internalized it as referring only to the jc incident - yes, I should read more carefully), and because I know that discord amongst advisors will probably work against Mattisse, this is meant as a non-actionable comment. (I should add that Mattisse is proud of her accomplishments on wikipedia - do we want to kill that pride?) -- +++$+++ :::::: For the record, I disagree with this block, as I do with the 'any edit' sanction placed by SilkTork above. Asking Mattisse not to comment further on the joopercoopers incident without advice is appropriate but asking her not to edit at all in the request for clarification is not. However, since I did not weigh in earlier (I did see silktork's note but internalized it as referring only to the jc incident - yes, I should read more carefully), and because I know that discord amongst advisors will probably work against Mattisse, this is meant as a non-actionable comment. (I should add that Mattisse is proud of her accomplishments on wikipedia - do we want to kill that pride?) --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 23:08, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
271407 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271400 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.260345120E09 +++$+++ If the consensus of other advisors is that Mattisse does not need clear and unambiguous guidance from her advisors, and that she should be free to deviate from that guidance accordingly, then I wish such advisors good luck. I am perfectly happy to resign my advisorship if that is the case. '' +++$+++ ::::::::If the consensus of other advisors is that Mattisse does not need clear and unambiguous guidance from her advisors, and that she should be free to deviate from that guidance accordingly, then I wish such advisors good luck. I am perfectly happy to resign my advisorship if that is the case. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

613212 +++$+++ Gnixon +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613212 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-01 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.214980080E09 +++$+++ I should clarify, as I did to KillerChihuaha, that I was accusing you of using dishonest debate tactics, not of being a \"liar.\"  That accusation is not a personal attack, and if accurate, is entirely fair.  I apologize that my comments came off as more personal than they should have---I admit I was worked up.  In any case, as I said at the RfC talk, I'm in the process of re-evaluating that accusation out of respect for your generally calm demeanor.   +++$+++ I should clarify, as I did to KillerChihuaha, that I was accusing you of using dishonest debate tactics, not of being a "liar."  That accusation is not a personal attack, and if accurate, is entirely fair.  I apologize that my comments came off as more personal than they should have---I admit I was worked up.  In any case, as I said at the RfC talk, I'm in the process of re-evaluating that accusation out of respect for your generally calm demeanor.  [[User:Gnixon|Gnixon]] ([[User talk:Gnixon|talk]]) 23:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
613213 +++$+++ Jim62sch +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613212 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-02 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.215062160E09 +++$+++ How are the debating tactics dishonest?  Have you ever debated in the scholastic sense?  I have.  Dave is well with the bounds of proper debating techniques.  +++$+++ ::How are the debating tactics dishonest?  Have you ever debated in the scholastic sense?  I have.  Dave is well with the bounds of proper debating techniques. [[User:Jim62sch|<font face="Times New Roman" color="FF2400">&#0149;Jim</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="F4C430">62</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="000000">sch&#0149;</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Jim62sch|dissera!]]</sup> 22:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
613214 +++$+++ Gnixon +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613212 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-02 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.215062460E09 +++$+++ I'd prefer to keep this conversation between Dave and myself.  If you'd like to discuss the issue with me, let's do it on my talk page.   +++$+++ :::I'd prefer to keep this conversation between Dave and myself.  If you'd like to discuss the issue with me, let's do it on my talk page.  [[User:Gnixon|Gnixon]] ([[User talk:Gnixon|talk]]) 22:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
613215 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613212 +++$+++ 613212 +++$+++ 2008-07-06 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.215340920E09 +++$+++ Gnixon, I'm in the middle of a respite break just now and have not had the time to give this the careful consideration I think it merits. The fact that you have struck the comments is appreciated, though your comment at that time looks a bit like a [[non-apology apology]], and evidently you're awaiting the outcome of this discussion before going further.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment\/Intelligent_Design&diff=223003016&oldid=223002779] My request is simply that you withdraw any implication or suggestion that I have acted dishonestly, and accusing me of \"using dishonest debate tactics\" clearly carries that implication. . .   +++$+++ :Gnixon, I'm in the middle of a respite break just now and have not had the time to give this the careful consideration I think it merits. The fact that you have struck the comments is appreciated, though your comment at that time looks a bit like a [[non-apology apology]], and evidently you're awaiting the outcome of this discussion before going further.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Intelligent_Design&diff=223003016&oldid=223002779] My request is simply that you withdraw any implication or suggestion that I have acted dishonestly, and accusing me of "using dishonest debate tactics" clearly carries that implication. . .  [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 03:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
613216 +++$+++ Gnixon +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613212 +++$+++ 613215 +++$+++ 2008-07-06 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.215356040E09 +++$+++ This is now a much longer post than I originally intended, and it's rather late, so know that I'm hitting \"save page\" without looking carefully back over it.   +++$+++ ::This is now a much longer post than I originally intended, and it's rather late, so know that I'm hitting "save page" without looking carefully back over it.  [[User:Gnixon|Gnixon]] ([[User talk:Gnixon|talk]]) 07:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

9259 +++$+++ Kralizec! +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9259 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.174462080E09 +++$+++ Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! -- +++$+++ Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 00:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
9260 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9259 +++$+++ 9259 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.174462560E09 +++$+++ Ok,I will improve.-- +++$+++ :Ok,I will improve.--[[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]] 00:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

593883 +++$+++  +++$+++ Nick carson +++$+++ 593883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I can probably get some more photos for the gallery, expand the history section, if you wanna work on it. Ottre 10:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ I can probably get some more photos for the gallery, expand the history section, if you wanna work on it. Ottre 10:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
593884 +++$+++ Nick carson +++$+++ Nick carson +++$+++ 593883 +++$+++ 593883 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.236793260E09 +++$+++ Hi Ottre. The article was still under construction so it might be a bit early for a copyedit. Don't go changing sections and whatnot as the information you are assessing the article on only applies to complete articles. What we ''do'' need done on this article is a redirect removal to separate out \"Ruffey Creek\", \"Ruffey Lake\" and \"Ruffey Lake Park\", at present, all 3 redirect to Ruffey Lake Park which means I cannot create the other two articles. This is the most pressing issue with the article at the moment. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Hi Ottre. The article was still under construction so it might be a bit early for a copyedit. Don't go changing sections and whatnot as the information you are assessing the article on only applies to complete articles. What we ''do'' need done on this article is a redirect removal to separate out "Ruffey Creek", "Ruffey Lake" and "Ruffey Lake Park", at present, all 3 redirect to Ruffey Lake Park which means I cannot create the other two articles. This is the most pressing issue with the article at the moment. Thanks. [[User:Nick carson|Nick carson]] ([[User talk:Nick carson|talk]]) 10:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
593885 +++$+++  +++$+++ Nick carson +++$+++ 593883 +++$+++ 593884 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.236795720E09 +++$+++ That was actually  +++$+++ ::That was actually [[User:Chzz]] who did the assessment. I know full well there should be a separate article on the Linear Park (Ruffey Creek), it's just that it takes me an hour to get up there. If we were to meet up one weekend at the Doncaster library, I could make time. Ottre 11:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

533551 +++$+++ Scapler +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533551 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-27 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.227844560E09 +++$+++ I would be glad to help copyedit [[Slovenian presidential election, 2007]], always happy to help in anyway I can. Cheers!  +++$+++ I would be glad to help copyedit [[Slovenian presidential election, 2007]], always happy to help in anyway I can. Cheers! [[User:Scapler|Scapler]] ([[User talk:Scapler|talk]]) 19:56, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
533552 +++$+++ Scapler +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533551 +++$+++ 533551 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.227849000E09 +++$+++ I have partially copyedited the article, and I will complete the task later, after Thanksgiving dinner of Course! Cheers!  +++$+++ :I have partially copyedited the article, and I will complete the task later, after Thanksgiving dinner of Course! Cheers! [[User:Scapler|Scapler]] ([[User talk:Scapler|talk]]) 21:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
533553 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533551 +++$+++ 533552 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.227850140E09 +++$+++ Great, appreciated. Have a good dinner :-) --''' +++$+++ :: Great, appreciated. Have a good dinner :-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:29, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
533554 +++$+++ Lexo +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533551 +++$+++ 533553 +++$+++ 2008-11-28 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.227866280E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I had a second pass at the article and did all that I can do for this evening.  I think that Scapler is probably turkeyed to the max right now, so I wouldn't expect more from him tonight.  See what you think, anyway; if you think it needs a further polish I will be able to give it one tomorrow afternoon, but no sooner. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Hi.  I had a second pass at the article and did all that I can do for this evening.  I think that Scapler is probably turkeyed to the max right now, so I wouldn't expect more from him tonight.  See what you think, anyway; if you think it needs a further polish I will be able to give it one tomorrow afternoon, but no sooner. Cheers, [[User:Lexo|Lexo]] ([[User talk:Lexo|talk]]) 01:58, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
533555 +++$+++ Lexo +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533551 +++$+++ 533554 +++$+++ 2008-11-28 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.227942480E09 +++$+++ Hi again.  Reviewing the article I notice many sentences that are just not going to help you get FA status, if that's really what you want, and I am doing my best to fix them.  I will let you know when I have done everything I think I can do.  +++$+++ ::::Hi again.  Reviewing the article I notice many sentences that are just not going to help you get FA status, if that's really what you want, and I am doing my best to fix them.  I will let you know when I have done everything I think I can do. [[User:Lexo|Lexo]] ([[User talk:Lexo|talk]]) 23:08, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
533556 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533551 +++$+++ 533551 +++$+++ 2008-11-28 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.227936000E09 +++$+++ Hi. If you can fix the problems that were stated in the nomination, it would be ok. But remember, items must be sufficiently notable to some degree to have articles, not the other way. Wikipedia is not supposed to be used as a way to promote a product. Maybe you should wait some time and write the article later if the software will be used wider? Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. If you can fix the problems that were stated in the nomination, it would be ok. But remember, items must be sufficiently notable to some degree to have articles, not the other way. Wikipedia is not supposed to be used as a way to promote a product. Maybe you should wait some time and write the article later if the software will be used wider? Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:20, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

271410 +++$+++ DVdm +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271410 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-10 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.260503160E09 +++$+++ Fwiw, I agree with your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Frank_Zappa&diff=next&oldid=330860178 removal] of the tag. I had [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Frank_Zappa&diff=prev&oldid=330696507 inserted it] to avoid biting 71.190.97.179. Cheers,  +++$+++ Fwiw, I agree with your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frank_Zappa&diff=next&oldid=330860178 removal] of the tag. I had [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frank_Zappa&diff=prev&oldid=330696507 inserted it] to avoid biting 71.190.97.179. Cheers, [[User:DVdm|DVdm]] ([[User talk:DVdm|talk]]) 19:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
271411 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271410 +++$+++ 271410 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.260503400E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your words. I am the second author of that article and I tend to watch over it. For some reason it gets a lot of vandalism.  Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ :Thank you for your words. I am the second author of that article and I tend to watch over it. For some reason it gets a lot of vandalism.  Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

569523 +++$+++ Mrmoocow +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-03 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.167886320E09 +++$+++ By the way, I was wondering about when or when not you should link an article? For example, for an article about a [[:Labrador Retriever|dog breed]], link to [[dog]]? Should an article about a [[:Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets|specific book]] link to [[:book]]? Etc, etc.  +++$+++ By the way, I was wondering about when or when not you should link an article? For example, for an article about a [[:Labrador Retriever|dog breed]], link to [[dog]]? Should an article about a [[:Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets|specific book]] link to [[:book]]? Etc, etc. [[User:Mrmoocow|Mrmoocow]] 20:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
569524 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569523 +++$+++ 569523 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.167981900E09 +++$+++ Hmm, I am not quite sure what you are getting at.  Perhaps you mean categories rather than Wiki-links?  Articles should be categorised appropriately, yes.  This doesn't mean that every generic category such as 'Dogs' or 'Books' becomes top-loaded with every article that mentions either respective creature and object.  Categories are hierarchical, so 'Books' can be broken down in to year of publication, genre, author, etc.  This way, the categories are manageable and navigable with human intervention.  If they were all top-loaded then they would be useless. Take a look at [[:Wikipedia:Categorization]] and the pages that link from it, particularly the [[:Wikipedia:Categorization FAQ|categorization FAQ]].  These should answer your questions.  This can be a very academic topic!  +++$+++ :Hmm, I am not quite sure what you are getting at.  Perhaps you mean categories rather than Wiki-links?  Articles should be categorised appropriately, yes.  This doesn't mean that every generic category such as 'Dogs' or 'Books' becomes top-loaded with every article that mentions either respective creature and object.  Categories are hierarchical, so 'Books' can be broken down in to year of publication, genre, author, etc.  This way, the categories are manageable and navigable with human intervention.  If they were all top-loaded then they would be useless. Take a look at [[:Wikipedia:Categorization]] and the pages that link from it, particularly the [[:Wikipedia:Categorization FAQ|categorization FAQ]].  These should answer your questions.  This can be a very academic topic! [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:25, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

271413 +++$+++ Jezhotwells +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-14 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.260782580E09 +++$+++ I have reverted your addition of the {{tl|refimprove}} tag as a brief glance at the bibliography shows that the article is in fact thoroughly referenced to reliable sources.  Whilst in-line citations may be preferred by some there is no policy mandating them.  +++$+++ I have reverted your addition of the {{tl|refimprove}} tag as a brief glance at the bibliography shows that the article is in fact thoroughly referenced to reliable sources.  Whilst in-line citations may be preferred by some there is no policy mandating them. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 01:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
271414 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271413 +++$+++ 271413 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.260782820E09 +++$+++ I am adding some {{t|cn}} tags at some of the  points that need to be specifically referenced, regardless of general references the reader must comb through at the bottom. General references at the end of the article are not enough to comply with [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] for specific facts. Large swaths of outsourced material is not ok.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :I am adding some {{t|cn}} tags at some of the  points that need to be specifically referenced, regardless of general references the reader must comb through at the bottom. General references at the end of the article are not enough to comply with [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] for specific facts. Large swaths of outsourced material is not ok.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

9270 +++$+++ Armedblowfish  +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-26 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.177587660E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Daniel.Bryant|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel&nbsp;Bryant</span>]] and [[User talk:Armedblowfish |Armed Blowfish]] ([[Special:Emailuser/Armedblowfish |mail]]), 04:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
9271 +++$+++ Daniel.Bryant +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9270 +++$+++ 9270 +++$+++ 2007-05-04 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.178282340E09 +++$+++ Would it be possible for you to do what is outlined above as soon as possible? Many of the parties are itching to begin, and it'd be great if you could get on board too. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Would it be possible for you to do what is outlined above as soon as possible? Many of the parties are itching to begin, and it'd be great if you could get on board too. Cheers, '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel&nbsp;Bryant</span>]]''' 05:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

271415 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271415 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-14 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.260838080E09 +++$+++ I will follow the Clarification outcome regarding FA processes as well as other processes. If the Clarification mandates it, I will also refrain from improving, correcting spelling and grammar, evaluating sources and such for articles that already at FA status. I used to try to check the \"Main Page\" article for errors but will no longer do that ''for the time being''. I'll let the errors remain ''for now''. I used to be told to comment on the article talk page, but since that seems to enrage FA article owners, I will no longer do so for FA articles ''for now''. To repeat, I will abide by the Clarification outcome. Remarks where I am thinking out loud or sending up trial balloons to my mentors or other should not be used as attempts to trap me in the future. Rather than follow my every trial remark to my mentors or to posters on my talk page, let's all agree to follow the directions of the ArbCom. It is agreed that we are all human here, isn't it?  And after all, the cultural atmosphere dominating at the FA processes may change in the future and become more pleasant and rewarding. Anything can happen, so no comment or \"thinking out loud\" statement that I made or will make should be considered permanent to use as a trap, as all that does is shut down on wiki conversation between me an my advisers, not a goal to be sought.  Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ I will follow the Clarification outcome regarding FA processes as well as other processes. If the Clarification mandates it, I will also refrain from improving, correcting spelling and grammar, evaluating sources and such for articles that already at FA status. I used to try to check the "Main Page" article for errors but will no longer do that ''for the time being''. I'll let the errors remain ''for now''. I used to be told to comment on the article talk page, but since that seems to enrage FA article owners, I will no longer do so for FA articles ''for now''. To repeat, I will abide by the Clarification outcome. Remarks where I am thinking out loud or sending up trial balloons to my mentors or other should not be used as attempts to trap me in the future. Rather than follow my every trial remark to my mentors or to posters on my talk page, let's all agree to follow the directions of the ArbCom. It is agreed that we are all human here, isn't it?  And after all, the cultural atmosphere dominating at the FA processes may change in the future and become more pleasant and rewarding. Anything can happen, so no comment or "thinking out loud" statement that I made or will make should be considered permanent to use as a trap, as all that does is shut down on wiki conversation between me an my advisers, not a goal to be sought.  Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
271416 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271415 +++$+++ 271415 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.260852900E09 +++$+++ I would like to propose that My Plan be modified to take into account what ArbCom currently sees as my problems. Much of the plan concerns behaviors I no longer engage in. Making off-the-cuff comments to posters on my talk page regarding dyk, and thinking out loud to my mentors are not problems the arbs  mention as major. If these sorts of complaints are encouraged on the \"alerts\" page, that page will soon degenerate into the \"circus\" and\/or \"train wreck\" that the Arbitration and Clarification did because of the volume of trivial, misleading complaints made there. Minor, frivolous complaints, or complaints that target human venting in frustration that are not uncivil or personal attacks,   out-of-date complains, voluminous, wordy complaints, or complaints by editors who are not involved in the incident but are merely following my contributions and talk page looking for incidents to report should be discouraged. The complaints should be by stake holders, not the police.  Further, as they did in the Arbitration, in the Clarification arbs recognize that much of the complaining about me is frivolous or unwarranted or just plain wrong. e.g.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification&curid=22747419&diff=331646380&oldid=331642728] Please, let us concentrate on what is important and recognize that I am fallible but trying. At a time when the subject is whether or not I will be banned from FAC, DYK etc., statements of ventilation by me made in personal contexts should not be help against me.  Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ :I would like to propose that My Plan be modified to take into account what ArbCom currently sees as my problems. Much of the plan concerns behaviors I no longer engage in. Making off-the-cuff comments to posters on my talk page regarding dyk, and thinking out loud to my mentors are not problems the arbs  mention as major. If these sorts of complaints are encouraged on the "alerts" page, that page will soon degenerate into the "circus" and/or "train wreck" that the Arbitration and Clarification did because of the volume of trivial, misleading complaints made there. Minor, frivolous complaints, or complaints that target human venting in frustration that are not uncivil or personal attacks,   out-of-date complains, voluminous, wordy complaints, or complaints by editors who are not involved in the incident but are merely following my contributions and talk page looking for incidents to report should be discouraged. The complaints should be by stake holders, not the police.  Further, as they did in the Arbitration, in the Clarification arbs recognize that much of the complaining about me is frivolous or unwarranted or just plain wrong. e.g.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification&curid=22747419&diff=331646380&oldid=331642728] Please, let us concentrate on what is important and recognize that I am fallible but trying. At a time when the subject is whether or not I will be banned from FAC, DYK etc., statements of ventilation by me made in personal contexts should not be help against me.  Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:55, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

524051 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524051 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-02 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.186086720E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Amy Mihaljevic]] has a clear ''Keep'' consensus. Twice as many people are arguing for keeping instead of deleting, there are a large number of unrelated reliable sources, and it's a real stretch to bring up BLP concerns when no living people are mentioned in the article (some were before, but that was addressed). If that isn't a ''Keep'' consensus, then almost nothing is. Please change your closing. -- +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Mihaljevic]] has a clear ''Keep'' consensus. Twice as many people are arguing for keeping instead of deleting, there are a large number of unrelated reliable sources, and it's a real stretch to bring up BLP concerns when no living people are mentioned in the article (some were before, but that was addressed). If that isn't a ''Keep'' consensus, then almost nothing is. Please change your closing. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 13:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
524052 +++$+++ Neil +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524051 +++$+++ 524051 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.186088640E09 +++$+++ It was closed as \"no consensus, default to keep\".  What difference does it make?  +++$+++ :It was closed as "no consensus, default to keep".  What difference does it make? [[User:Neil|<span style="text-decoration:none; font-family: cursive ;color: #006600">Neil</span>]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Neil|<span style="text-decoration:none; color: #006600"><big>╦</big></span>]] 14:04, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

271417 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-14 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.260857640E09 +++$+++ To end on a positive note, I can see you are trying, and am glad you recognise your own fallibility and are showing a greater willingness to tolerate the fallibility of others. '' +++$+++ To end on a positive note, I can see you are trying, and am glad you recognise your own fallibility and are showing a greater willingness to tolerate the fallibility of others. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 22:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
271418 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271417 +++$+++ 271417 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.260857760E09 +++$+++ PS. Thanks for your additional post on my talk page. I have rephrased the above. '' +++$+++ : PS. Thanks for your additional post on my talk page. I have rephrased the above. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 22:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

9274 +++$+++ Babelfisch +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-08 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.178620440E09 +++$+++ Please stop the edit war on [[South Tibet]] and please stop re-inserting unsourced material. Please have another look at the talk page for that article. \u2014 +++$+++ Please stop the edit war on [[South Tibet]] and please stop re-inserting unsourced material. Please have another look at the talk page for that article. —[[User:Babelfisch|Babelfisch]] 03:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
9275 +++$+++ Babelfisch +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9274 +++$+++ 9274 +++$+++ 2007-05-11 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.178892240E09 +++$+++ Such behaviour \u2013 and calling other users \"vandals\" for removing unsourced material \u2013 is unacceptable. \u2014 +++$+++ :Such behaviour – and calling other users "vandals" for removing unsourced material – is unacceptable. —[[User:Babelfisch|Babelfisch]] 07:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

351071 +++$+++ Melchoir +++$+++ Melchoir +++$+++ 351071 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-10 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.281458040E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ Cheers, [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir|talk]]) 09:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
351072 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Melchoir +++$+++ 351071 +++$+++ 351071 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.281458760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note. Feel free to do what you are most comfortable with. If, as the review progresses, the thread of some discussions becomes entangled or confusing I may refactor - though that would be done only to ensure clarity, and anyone would be most welcome to refactor my refactoring if they saw a more helpful way of presenting the material. Regards <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :Thanks for the note. Feel free to do what you are most comfortable with. If, as the review progresses, the thread of some discussions becomes entangled or confusing I may refactor - though that would be done only to ensure clarity, and anyone would be most welcome to refactor my refactoring if they saw a more helpful way of presenting the material. Regards <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 09:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
351073 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Melchoir +++$+++ 351071 +++$+++ 351072 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.281725340E09 +++$+++ I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow the issues I've raised to be dealt with or discussed. I normally contact other contributors, though nobody else has done anything significant on the article! Regards <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ ::I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow the issues I've raised to be dealt with or discussed. I normally contact other contributors, though nobody else has done anything significant on the article! Regards <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 11:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
351074 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Melchoir +++$+++ 351071 +++$+++ 351073 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.283295180E09 +++$+++ I've closed as a fail. Good luck with developing and renominating it. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :::I've closed as a fail. Good luck with developing and renominating it. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 15:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

271420 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-16 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.260955920E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, now that arbcom has done with the clarification and we know where we all stand, I do suggest that you ask before you post anything that remotely comments on an editor. And, please, please don't respond to anything without first getting some input from one of your mentors. You are at an immense disadvantage (possibly for good reasons) in any discussion and you should recognize that if you get into a back and forth with anyone you are almost certainly going to end up with a block. Which, I suspect, cannot be nice at all. There is plenty of stuff to do on wikipedia, and moving on is always a good idea!-- +++$+++ Mattisse, now that arbcom has done with the clarification and we know where we all stand, I do suggest that you ask before you post anything that remotely comments on an editor. And, please, please don't respond to anything without first getting some input from one of your mentors. You are at an immense disadvantage (possibly for good reasons) in any discussion and you should recognize that if you get into a back and forth with anyone you are almost certainly going to end up with a block. Which, I suspect, cannot be nice at all. There is plenty of stuff to do on wikipedia, and moving on is always a good idea!--[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 01:32, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
271421 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271420 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-16 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.260992400E09 +++$+++ \"Any  posts I do make  will be accompanied with profuse apologies.\" That would not be helpful. Neutral posts without any attached baggage are what people are looking for. We are here to build the encyclopedia - the talkpages are here to assist in communication about the encyclopedia - as such please reduce comment about yourself and others as much as possible. While we are permitted to make casual and chatty comments, especially on our own talkpages, this should be kept to a minimum, especially if there have been issues about the ability of a person to communicate without conflict. Any frustrations you feel about being under scrutiny, and whatever unfairness you feel should be kept off Wikipedia - even off your own talkpage. This is not the place to be airing your frustrations and hurts. Share your personal anxieties and pressures with real life friends, or via email with your advisors, but not here on Wikipedia. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ ::"Any  posts I do make  will be accompanied with profuse apologies." That would not be helpful. Neutral posts without any attached baggage are what people are looking for. We are here to build the encyclopedia - the talkpages are here to assist in communication about the encyclopedia - as such please reduce comment about yourself and others as much as possible. While we are permitted to make casual and chatty comments, especially on our own talkpages, this should be kept to a minimum, especially if there have been issues about the ability of a person to communicate without conflict. Any frustrations you feel about being under scrutiny, and whatever unfairness you feel should be kept off Wikipedia - even off your own talkpage. This is not the place to be airing your frustrations and hurts. Share your personal anxieties and pressures with real life friends, or via email with your advisors, but not here on Wikipedia. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 11:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

9277 +++$+++ Nat Krause +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9277 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-12 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.179036060E09 +++$+++ Please respond to my comments at [[Talk:South_Tibet#Sources]] when you get a chance.&mdash; +++$+++ Please respond to my comments at [[Talk:South_Tibet#Sources]] when you get a chance.&mdash;[[User:Nat Krause|Nat Krause]]<sup>([[User talk:Nat Krause|Talk!]]·[[Special:Contributions/Nat Krause|What have I done?]])</sup> 23:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
9278 +++$+++ Danaman5 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9277 +++$+++ 9277 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.179621480E09 +++$+++ I also stopped by the article and requested that you explain your position and the sources that support it.  I am new to this issue and it would be helpful.-- +++$+++ :I also stopped by the article and requested that you explain your position and the sources that support it.  I am new to this issue and it would be helpful.--[[User:Danaman5|Danaman5]] 17:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
9279 +++$+++ Danaman5 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9277 +++$+++ 9278 +++$+++ 2007-05-20 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.179652080E09 +++$+++ Sorry, could you give me specific statements that you believe should be in the article and the sources that accompany them? I am trying to make a compromise between your position and the others, and to do that, I will need to know exactly what statements you want in the article.  I looked at the [[Arunachal Pradesh]] article, but I can't tell which statements you support.-- +++$+++ ::Sorry, could you give me specific statements that you believe should be in the article and the sources that accompany them? I am trying to make a compromise between your position and the others, and to do that, I will need to know exactly what statements you want in the article.  I looked at the [[Arunachal Pradesh]] article, but I can't tell which statements you support.--[[User:Danaman5|Danaman5]] 02:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

533566 +++$+++ Castlemate +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-09 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.228831740E09 +++$+++ If there was a discussion I would like to read it but I can't find it.  +++$+++ If there was a discussion I would like to read it but I can't find it. [[User:Castlemate|Castlemate]] ([[User talk:Castlemate|talk]]) 06:09, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
533567 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533566 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.228879260E09 +++$+++ There was no additional discussion, the deletion was due to [[WP:PROD]], proposed deletion. The reason given it stated above. --''' +++$+++ :: There was no additional discussion, the deletion was due to [[WP:PROD]], proposed deletion. The reason given it stated above. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
533568 +++$+++ Castlemate +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533566 +++$+++ 533566 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.229453400E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone, Have you given this some consideration?  +++$+++ :Hi Tone, Have you given this some consideration? [[User:Castlemate|Castlemate]] ([[User talk:Castlemate|talk]]) 10:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
533569 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533566 +++$+++ 533568 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.229456340E09 +++$+++ Hey, sorry, I must have missed your post... Ok, I'll restore the article so you can work on it. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ :: Hey, sorry, I must have missed your post... Ok, I'll restore the article so you can work on it. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

9282 +++$+++ KNHaw +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9282 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-17 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.179402720E09 +++$+++ FYI, I cleaned up some grammar on your edit to [[Chi Mak]] and also presented the prosecution viewpoint.  Thought you'd want to know...  -- +++$+++ FYI, I cleaned up some grammar on your edit to [[Chi Mak]] and also presented the prosecution viewpoint.  Thought you'd want to know...  --[[User:KNHaw|<font face="comic sans ms"><font color="SeaGreen"><i><b>KNHaw</b></i></font></font>]] <font color="SeaGreen">[[User talk:KNHaw|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]</font> 04:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
9283 +++$+++ KNHaw +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9282 +++$+++ 9282 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.179403860E09 +++$+++ You asked \"why you deleting the public domain materials?\"  Well, the term [[Public domain]] has a very specific usage, implying that anyone can copy, distribute, or sell it for any reason we wish.  From what I understand about the case, his defense attorney was claiming that it was not classified or export controlled, not that it was public domain (more than likely, his employer owns the information that he produced and could sue anyone who went out and publically claimed they owned it).  The government was not prosecuting him for taking copyrighted material out of the U.S., but for taking out information that was covered by other specific espionage laws.  -- +++$+++ :You asked "why you deleting the public domain materials?"  Well, the term [[Public domain]] has a very specific usage, implying that anyone can copy, distribute, or sell it for any reason we wish.  From what I understand about the case, his defense attorney was claiming that it was not classified or export controlled, not that it was public domain (more than likely, his employer owns the information that he produced and could sue anyone who went out and publically claimed they owned it).  The government was not prosecuting him for taking copyrighted material out of the U.S., but for taking out information that was covered by other specific espionage laws.  --[[User:KNHaw|<font face="comic sans ms"><font color="SeaGreen"><i><b>KNHaw</b></i></font></font>]] <font color="SeaGreen">[[User talk:KNHaw|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]</font> 05:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
9284 +++$+++ KNHaw +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9282 +++$+++ 9283 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.179458280E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:KNHaw|<font face="comic sans ms"><font color="SeaGreen"><i><b>KNHaw</b></i></font></font>]] <font color="SeaGreen">[[User talk:KNHaw|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]</font> 20:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
9285 +++$+++ KNHaw +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9282 +++$+++ 9284 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.179557340E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:KNHaw|<font face="comic sans ms"><font color="SeaGreen"><i><b>KNHaw</b></i></font></font>]] <font color="SeaGreen">[[User talk:KNHaw|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]</font> 23:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

525835 +++$+++ Namiba +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-13 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.289657940E09 +++$+++ Hi there, I noticed you have created a number of Golf biographies. Thank you for your work. I created a set of categories today sorting golfers by their home state, i.e. {{cl|Golfers from Texas}}. When you create new articles, please add this category when appropriate.-- +++$+++ Hi there, I noticed you have created a number of Golf biographies. Thank you for your work. I created a set of categories today sorting golfers by their home state, i.e. {{cl|Golfers from Texas}}. When you create new articles, please add this category when appropriate.--[[User:Namiba|TM]] 06:19, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
525836 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Michfan2123 +++$+++ 525835 +++$+++ 525835 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.295934600E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 21:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

271428 +++$+++ Cody574 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-21 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.261385580E09 +++$+++ See [[User_talk:Cody574#Removing_citation_tags]].  +++$+++ See [[User_talk:Cody574#Removing_citation_tags]]. [[User:Cody574|<span style="color:#0000FF">'''Cody''']][[User talk:Cody574|<sup>''574''</sup></span>]] 00:53, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
271429 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271428 +++$+++ 271428 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.261386060E09 +++$+++ When you did this:[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Smash_Records&curid=1071699&diff=332950629&oldid=332950488] you removed the \"citation needed\" tag. Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ :When you did this:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Smash_Records&curid=1071699&diff=332950629&oldid=332950488] you removed the "citation needed" tag. Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:01, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
271430 +++$+++ Cody574 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271428 +++$+++ 271429 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.261386000E09 +++$+++ Oh, I'm sorry, I meant to revert something else. You can blame Lupin for making his anti-vandal tool all bunched together and messy.  +++$+++ ::Oh, I'm sorry, I meant to revert something else. You can blame Lupin for making his anti-vandal tool all bunched together and messy. [[User:Cody574|<span style="color:#0000FF">'''Cody''']][[User talk:Cody574|<sup>''574''</sup></span>]] 01:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
271431 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271428 +++$+++ 271430 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.261386360E09 +++$+++ OK. Thanks for the apology. The tools can be confusing. It should not be too difficult to find references for the material you added. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::OK. Thanks for the apology. The tools can be confusing. It should not be too difficult to find references for the material you added. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

533573 +++$+++ FullSpecWarrior +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-09 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.228894500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:FullSpecWarrior|FullSpecWarrior]] ([[User talk:FullSpecWarrior|talk]]) 23:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
533574 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533573 +++$+++ 533573 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.229289000E09 +++$+++ Hi. I am not sure whic article exactly we are talking about. Artisan Software was deleted under argumentation that it was an advertisement but it was not me who deleted it. If you tell me the exact title of the article, I can check. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I am not sure whic article exactly we are talking about. Artisan Software was deleted under argumentation that it was an advertisement but it was not me who deleted it. If you tell me the exact title of the article, I can check. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:10, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
533575 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533573 +++$+++ 533573 +++$+++ 2008-12-18 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.229634780E09 +++$+++ Hi. I answered on your talkpage. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I answered on your talkpage. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

533576 +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-14 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.229262540E09 +++$+++ I noticed you deleted an article started for [[Alta Communications]] almost two weeks ago.  I was on a break and did not notice this one or I would have tried to help out.  This is a notable firm - it is actually one of several firms that came out of a very early PE player.  It would be great if you could restore the text as a subpage in my user space and I will get it in shape - although looking at was [http:\/\/64.233.169.132\/search?q=cache:AkRVSEgVXskJ:en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Alta_Communications there] it was not a terrible start.  Thanks <font color=\"#3950A5\" size=\"1\">|\u25ba<\/font>  +++$+++ I noticed you deleted an article started for [[Alta Communications]] almost two weeks ago.  I was on a break and did not notice this one or I would have tried to help out.  This is a notable firm - it is actually one of several firms that came out of a very early PE player.  It would be great if you could restore the text as a subpage in my user space and I will get it in shape - although looking at was [http://64.233.169.132/search?q=cache:AkRVSEgVXskJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alta_Communications there] it was not a terrible start.  Thanks <font color="#3950A5" size="1">|►</font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color="#000070"><b>ϋrban</b></font><font color="#4D4D4D">яenewaℓ</font>]] • [[User talk:Urbanrenewal|<font size="0" color="#BFA137">TALK</font>]] <font color="#3950A5" size="1">◄|</font> 05:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
533577 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533576 +++$+++ 533576 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.229289000E09 +++$+++ Ok, I'll copy the content. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, I'll copy the content. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:10, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
533578 +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533576 +++$+++ 533577 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.229290080E09 +++$+++ Thanks - that is great. PE firms are particularly hard to discern notability sometimes. If you ever have a question - please don't hesitate to drop me a line or look at some of the criteria we have discussed within the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance\/Private Equity Task Force|Private Equity Task Force]].  Thanks again. <font color=\"#3950A5\" size=\"1\">|\u25ba<\/font>  +++$+++ ::Thanks - that is great. PE firms are particularly hard to discern notability sometimes. If you ever have a question - please don't hesitate to drop me a line or look at some of the criteria we have discussed within the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance/Private Equity Task Force|Private Equity Task Force]].  Thanks again. <font color="#3950A5" size="1">|►</font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color="#000070"><b>ϋrban</b></font><font color="#4D4D4D">яenewaℓ</font>]] • [[User talk:Urbanrenewal|<font size="0" color="#BFA137">TALK</font>]] <font color="#3950A5" size="1">◄|</font> 13:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
533579 +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533576 +++$+++ 533576 +++$+++ 2008-12-18 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.229600820E09 +++$+++ Tone - one a similar note - I wanted to see if you could help with a similar request for [[Partners Group]] which you deleted in December 2007 and [[Quadrangle Group]] which you deleted in January 2008.   If you can drop them into [[User:Urbanrenewal\/Partners Group]] and [[User:Urbanrenewal\/Quadrangle Group]] that would be appreciated.  Thanks <font color=\"#3950A5\" size=\"1\">|\u25ba<\/font>  +++$+++ :Tone - one a similar note - I wanted to see if you could help with a similar request for [[Partners Group]] which you deleted in December 2007 and [[Quadrangle Group]] which you deleted in January 2008.   If you can drop them into [[User:Urbanrenewal/Partners Group]] and [[User:Urbanrenewal/Quadrangle Group]] that would be appreciated.  Thanks <font color="#3950A5" size="1">|►</font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color="#000070"><b>ϋrban</b></font><font color="#4D4D4D">яenewaℓ</font>]] • [[User talk:Urbanrenewal|<font size="0" color="#BFA137">TALK</font>]] <font color="#3950A5" size="1">◄|</font> 03:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
533580 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533576 +++$+++ 533579 +++$+++ 2008-12-18 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.229632020E09 +++$+++ Hi. It got deleted once more after I had deleted it, because it was a copyvio. Then, I suppose you can reach the content here: [http:\/\/www.partnersgroup.net\/docs\/news\/pressreleases\/20070219_pca_e.pdf], no need to copy. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ :: Hi. It got deleted once more after I had deleted it, because it was a copyvio. Then, I suppose you can reach the content here: [http://www.partnersgroup.net/docs/news/pressreleases/20070219_pca_e.pdf], no need to copy. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
533581 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533576 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-19 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.229712180E09 +++$+++ Nothing worth keeping there, IMO... just around 5 sentences with basic info and no references except for company's website. A complete rewrite would be required. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ :::: Nothing worth keeping there, IMO... just around 5 sentences with basic info and no references except for company's website. A complete rewrite would be required. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

271434 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-22 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.261552380E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
271435 +++$+++ DVdm +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271434 +++$+++ 271434 +++$+++ 2009-12-23 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.261604100E09 +++$+++ I wish you a Merry Christmas and a Super 2010! Cheers and keep up the good work.  +++$+++ :I wish you a Merry Christmas and a Super 2010! Cheers and keep up the good work. [[User:DVdm|DVdm]] ([[User talk:DVdm|talk]]) 13:35, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

9291 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-20 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.177074600E09 +++$+++ The deletion of [[Xinjiang Chalkis Co.Ltd]][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Xinjiang+Chalkis+Co.Ltd] is in question,this company is the second biggest [[Ketchup]] producer in the world.-- +++$+++ The deletion of [[Xinjiang Chalkis Co.Ltd]][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Xinjiang+Chalkis+Co.Ltd] is in question,this company is the second biggest [[Ketchup]] producer in the world.--[[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]] 06:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
9292 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9291 +++$+++ 9291 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.181194560E09 +++$+++ wait your reply.-- +++$+++ :wait your reply.--[[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]] 22:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
9293 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9291 +++$+++ 9292 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.181215500E09 +++$+++ With only the words \"One of the most biggest [[Ketchup]] producer in the world\", the article [[Xinjiang Chalkis Co.Ltd]] did not assert the notability of the subject.  If you create the article with [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], and it is notable as you say, then it will not be deleted again. \u2014<span style=\"color: red;\"> +++$+++ ::With only the words "One of the most biggest [[Ketchup]] producer in the world", the article [[Xinjiang Chalkis Co.Ltd]] did not assert the notability of the subject.  If you create the article with [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], and it is notable as you say, then it will not be deleted again. —<span style="color: red;">[[User:Mets501|M<small>ETS</small>501]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 04:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
9294 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9291 +++$+++ 9293 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.181215620E09 +++$+++ please to restore it,I will add the necessary references.-- +++$+++ :::please to restore it,I will add the necessary references.--[[User:Ksyrie|Ksyrie]] 04:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
9295 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9291 +++$+++ 9294 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.181215800E09 +++$+++ OK, I've restored it.  You should add the references quickly before another admin comes along and deletes it :-) \u2014<span style=\"color: red;\"> +++$+++ ::::OK, I've restored it.  You should add the references quickly before another admin comes along and deletes it :-) —<span style="color: red;">[[User:Mets501|M<small>ETS</small>501]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 04:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

533582 +++$+++ Elplatt +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-16 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.229433840E09 +++$+++ Why did you delete the 826 Valencia article?  The organization is extremely notable, and led to the founder winning the prestigious TED prize.  I can't imagine a legitimate reason to delete the article, so this must be some kind of mistake.  -- +++$+++ Why did you delete the 826 Valencia article?  The organization is extremely notable, and led to the founder winning the prestigious TED prize.  I can't imagine a legitimate reason to delete the article, so this must be some kind of mistake.  --[[User:Elplatt|Elplatt]] ([[User talk:Elplatt|talk]]) 05:24, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
533583 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533582 +++$+++ 533582 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.229448600E09 +++$+++ Hi. This was a prod deletion. Now the article is restored but you may want to fix the style and the references. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. This was a prod deletion. Now the article is restored but you may want to fix the style and the references. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:30, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

271440 +++$+++ Earthdirt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271440 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-27 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.261974660E09 +++$+++ The online version is only in PDF, here is the [[http:\/\/www.gsejournal.org\/content\/pdf\/1297-9686-30-3-209.pdf|link]] I left the one I used because it gives the full citation which the PDF does not - and you can click to the PDF on the right menu from that page. Obviously it would take about 5 seconds to change this, let me know if I should. Thanks for your work. Peace,  +++$+++ The online version is only in PDF, here is the [[http://www.gsejournal.org/content/pdf/1297-9686-30-3-209.pdf|link]] I left the one I used because it gives the full citation which the PDF does not - and you can click to the PDF on the right menu from that page. Obviously it would take about 5 seconds to change this, let me know if I should. Thanks for your work. Peace, [[User:Earthdirt|Earthdirt]] ([[User talk:Earthdirt|talk]]) 20:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
271441 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271440 +++$+++ 271440 +++$+++ 2009-12-27 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.261975080E09 +++$+++ For DYK, the hook must be in the article with a reference sourcing it at the hook's end. I left a note on the dyk page where I thought I found a source in a PDF link there. Is that what you are referring to?  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :For DYK, the hook must be in the article with a reference sourcing it at the hook's end. I left a note on the dyk page where I thought I found a source in a PDF link there. Is that what you are referring to?  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

271442 +++$+++ Proofreader77 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-28 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.261992180E09 +++$+++ ... about '''[[Matisse]]''' ... which is what I've read your username as since I've seen it. Not that there should be any connection or affinity between you and Henri lol, but for the record, his and my life overlapped about 3 months. I arrived, he left. (Hope it wasn't anything I did. ;-)<p>In any case, I see you have dedicated much good work in the area of [[WP:Featured articles]]... and I am just now looking in that direction (having done my stint at RC patrol, and some current events wrangling on high profile BLPs).<p>The question of what \"good\" means in Wikipedia is something I must develop my understanding of. If you know of any essays you believe shine a \"good\" :-) light on that, please share them. Happy holidays and best wishes for a beautiful 2010.  +++$+++ ... about '''[[Matisse]]''' ... which is what I've read your username as since I've seen it. Not that there should be any connection or affinity between you and Henri lol, but for the record, his and my life overlapped about 3 months. I arrived, he left. (Hope it wasn't anything I did. ;-)<p>In any case, I see you have dedicated much good work in the area of [[WP:Featured articles]]... and I am just now looking in that direction (having done my stint at RC patrol, and some current events wrangling on high profile BLPs).<p>The question of what "good" means in Wikipedia is something I must develop my understanding of. If you know of any essays you believe shine a "good" :-) light on that, please share them. Happy holidays and best wishes for a beautiful 2010. [[User:Proofreader77|Proofreader77]] <sup>([[User talk:Proofreader77|interact]])</sup>  01:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
271443 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271442 +++$+++ 271442 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.262155620E09 +++$+++ Can't think of any specific essays to read. Just do a lot of reading, especially of articles and article reviews by editors. Everyone has their own definition of what \"good\" means.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Can't think of any specific essays to read. Just do a lot of reading, especially of articles and article reviews by editors. Everyone has their own definition of what "good" means.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:47, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
271444 +++$+++ Proofreader77 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271442 +++$+++ 271443 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.262395560E09 +++$+++ Much appreciate your taking a moment to think amidst holidays. re: \"Everyone has their own definition of what \"good\" means.\" - That's what I was afraid of. :-) Cheers.  +++$+++ :: Much appreciate your taking a moment to think amidst holidays. re: "Everyone has their own definition of what "good" means." - That's what I was afraid of. :-) Cheers. [[User:Proofreader77|Proofreader77]] <sup>([[User talk:Proofreader77|interact]])</sup>  17:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

9300 +++$+++ Shadowlynk +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9300 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-29 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.183178100E09 +++$+++ Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]] wait a while for you to add contextual material.  To do this, affix the template '''<code>{{tl|hangon}}<\/code>''' to the page and state your intention on the article's [[Help:Talk page|talk page]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Empty-warn --> --  +++$+++ Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]] wait a while for you to add contextual material.  To do this, affix the template '''<code>{{tl|hangon}}</code>''' to the page and state your intention on the article's [[Help:Talk page|talk page]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Empty-warn --> -- [[User:Shadowlynk|Shadowlynk]] ([[User_talk:Shadowlynk|Talk]]) 21:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
9301 +++$+++ Shadowlynk +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9300 +++$+++ 9300 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.183178340E09 +++$+++ I've temporarily removed the db tag to give time to expand the article. In the future, though, it would be helpful to include the <nowiki>{{in-use}}<\/nowiki> tag right away when creating an article that doesn't yet meet the minimum requirements for a [[WP:STUB|stub article]]. Thanks, and good luck on your article. :) --  +++$+++ :I've temporarily removed the db tag to give time to expand the article. In the future, though, it would be helpful to include the <nowiki>{{in-use}}</nowiki> tag right away when creating an article that doesn't yet meet the minimum requirements for a [[WP:STUB|stub article]]. Thanks, and good luck on your article. :) -- [[User:Shadowlynk|Shadowlynk]] ([[User_talk:Shadowlynk|Talk]]) 21:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

271445 +++$+++ Leonard G. +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-29 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.262157780E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Leonard G.|Leonard G.]] ([[User talk:Leonard G.|talk]]) 23:23, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
271446 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271445 +++$+++ 271445 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.262158080E09 +++$+++ AGF means that I accepted the Spanish language source for the hook  [[WP:AGF| in good faith]]. Since my Spanish is faulty, I will trust that you are translating the source material correctly.  So, all is good! Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :AGF means that I accepted the Spanish language source for the hook  [[WP:AGF| in good faith]]. Since my Spanish is faulty, I will trust that you are translating the source material correctly.  So, all is good! Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
271447 +++$+++ Leonard G. +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271445 +++$+++ 271446 +++$+++ 2009-12-30 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.262161860E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ :: Thanks, [[User:Leonard G.|Leonard G.]] ([[User talk:Leonard G.|talk]]) 00:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

9302 +++$+++ Coren +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-08 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.183891320E09 +++$+++ Happy editing!  &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ Happy editing!  &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 03:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
9303 +++$+++ Coren +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9302 +++$+++ 9302 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.183892520E09 +++$+++ Ayup.  A king is notable indeed, indeed!  :-)  Happy editing!  &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ :Ayup.  A king is notable indeed, indeed!  :-)  Happy editing!  &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 04:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

533591 +++$+++ Graham87 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-23 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.230043380E09 +++$+++ I've just undone your speedy deletion of [[Centro Karratha]]. I'm not sure whether the article should exist, but the speedy deletion tag on it was clearly inappropriate ... it was certainly not patent nonsense as it [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Centro_Karratha&diff=89811218&oldid=87313855 was tagged], and it didn't meet any of the other [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion criteria]]. I know it was two years ago, but it still makes me feel a bit uneasy that you deleted a page tagged for speedy deletion without making any apparent effort to check if the page met the criteria. ''' +++$+++ I've just undone your speedy deletion of [[Centro Karratha]]. I'm not sure whether the article should exist, but the speedy deletion tag on it was clearly inappropriate ... it was certainly not patent nonsense as it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Centro_Karratha&diff=89811218&oldid=87313855 was tagged], and it didn't meet any of the other [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion criteria]]. I know it was two years ago, but it still makes me feel a bit uneasy that you deleted a page tagged for speedy deletion without making any apparent effort to check if the page met the criteria. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 06:43, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
533592 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533591 +++$+++ 533591 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.230050280E09 +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for checking. Well, I agree it was tagged inappropriately as patent nonsense but it clearly fails A7 or advert CSD criteria so in my opinion the deletion was reasonable. Anyway, I see the article is a redirect to another topic now so I think there's no problem left. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Thanks for checking. Well, I agree it was tagged inappropriately as patent nonsense but it clearly fails A7 or advert CSD criteria so in my opinion the deletion was reasonable. Anyway, I see the article is a redirect to another topic now so I think there's no problem left. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

271448 +++$+++ Aloysius +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271448 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-01 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.262400660E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Aloysius|Aloysius]] ([[User talk:Aloysius|talk]]) 18:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
271449 +++$+++ Proofreader77 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271448 +++$+++ 271448 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.262401320E09 +++$+++ (Aside to mattisse) Does this mean you are an expert in Latin? ''(Excuse the interruption, just making a mental note for future reference)''  +++$+++ * (Aside to mattisse) Does this mean you are an expert in Latin? ''(Excuse the interruption, just making a mental note for future reference)'' [[User:Proofreader77|Proofreader77]] <sup>([[User talk:Proofreader77|interact]])</sup>  19:02, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
271450 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271448 +++$+++ 271449 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.262401680E09 +++$+++ (Edit conflict) I had to rewrite this as I lost it in an edit conflict. Nearest I can remember I said that I am not an expert in this, but the only part that does not work in English is \"He would uproar the peace of [[Styx]]\"  \u2014 +++$+++ :*(Edit conflict) I had to rewrite this as I lost it in an edit conflict. Nearest I can remember I said that I am not an expert in this, but the only part that does not work in English is "He would uproar the peace of [[Styx]]"  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
271451 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271448 +++$+++ 271450 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.262401800E09 +++$+++ Okay. So I suggested \"He would upset the peace\" or \"he would disrupt the peace\" or some wording like that. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::* Okay. So I suggested "He would upset the peace" or "he would disrupt the peace" or some wording like that. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
271452 +++$+++ Proofreader77 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271448 +++$+++ 271448 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.262402700E09 +++$+++ (Apologies re EC, won't happen again.)  +++$+++ * (Apologies re EC, won't happen again.) [[User:Proofreader77|Proofreader77]] <sup>([[User talk:Proofreader77|interact]])</sup>  19:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
271453 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271448 +++$+++ 271452 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.262403060E09 +++$+++ That's okay. It is really rare to lose the edit entirely. Usually it is retrievable. Don't know what happened there. Some kink in the wiki workings.  Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ :*That's okay. It is really rare to lose the edit entirely. Usually it is retrievable. Don't know what happened there. Some kink in the wiki workings.  Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

533593 +++$+++ Spencer +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-23 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.230080160E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --''' +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --'''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:green">Spencer</span>]]'''''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:red">Merry </span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:red">Christmas!</span>]]</sup>'' 16:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
533594 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533593 +++$+++ 533593 +++$+++ 2008-12-25 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.230270480E09 +++$+++ Hi. For article to exist, you must establish notability, such as participated at exhibitions, won awards... all with sources. Since you say she is well-known, you should not have any problems adding them. I will restore the article now. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. For article to exist, you must establish notability, such as participated at exhibitions, won awards... all with sources. Since you say she is well-known, you should not have any problems adding them. I will restore the article now. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:48, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

533595 +++$+++ Alensha +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533595 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-25 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.230270900E09 +++$+++ I've accidentally seen this and have to add that Google doesn't find anything about her in Hungarian pages, except that she indeed paints (as a hobby) and that she was a contestant on some minor beauty pageant. Talented, yes, but \"well known\" is an exaggeration, today was the first time I heard about her -- when her article was written in Hungarian wikipedia. (Would be on afd there if it wasn't copyvio which will be deleted anyway.) regards, \u2013  +++$+++ I've accidentally seen this and have to add that Google doesn't find anything about her in Hungarian pages, except that she indeed paints (as a hobby) and that she was a contestant on some minor beauty pageant. Talented, yes, but "well known" is an exaggeration, today was the first time I heard about her -- when her article was written in Hungarian wikipedia. (Would be on afd there if it wasn't copyvio which will be deleted anyway.) regards, – [[User:Alensha|<span style="color: #008ea1">Alensha</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Alensha|<span style="color: #008ea1"><sup>talk</sup></span>]] 21:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
533596 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533595 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-25 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.230271860E09 +++$+++ Ok, I'll keep an eye on the article and if it is not improved, I will act appropriately. Thanks for the notice, greetings. --''' +++$+++ :: Ok, I'll keep an eye on the article and if it is not improved, I will act appropriately. Thanks for the notice, greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:11, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

533597 +++$+++ Cgingold +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-27 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.230426000E09 +++$+++ Can you tell me how long [[:Category:Wines]] was empty prior to your deletion earlier today? Thanks.  +++$+++ Can you tell me how long [[:Category:Wines]] was empty prior to your deletion earlier today? Thanks. [[User:Cgingold|Cgingold]] ([[User talk:Cgingold|talk]]) 17:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
533598 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533597 +++$+++ 533597 +++$+++ 2008-12-27 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.230426540E09 +++$+++ Hi. I am unable to check that since it is not visible in the history. I assumed that the person who tagged it checked that. If needed, I can restore it. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I am unable to check that since it is not visible in the history. I assumed that the person who tagged it checked that. If needed, I can restore it. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
533599 +++$+++ Cgingold +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533597 +++$+++ 533598 +++$+++ 2008-12-27 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.230427800E09 +++$+++ Oh, I assumed that you, as an admin, would have checked that first yourself before proceeding to delete. I would never rely solely on the editor who requested deletion. I think it would be a good idea for you to restore the category, as it is involved in a [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2008_December_27#Category:Wine by country|CFD discussion]] that is currently under way. Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::Oh, I assumed that you, as an admin, would have checked that first yourself before proceeding to delete. I would never rely solely on the editor who requested deletion. I think it would be a good idea for you to restore the category, as it is involved in a [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_December_27#Category:Wine by country|CFD discussion]] that is currently under way. Thanks again. [[User:Cgingold|Cgingold]] ([[User talk:Cgingold|talk]]) 17:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
533600 +++$+++ Occuli +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533597 +++$+++ 533599 +++$+++ 2008-12-27 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.230429360E09 +++$+++ It was substantially populated yesterday and was emptied by bizarre edits such as [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Category:Wines_by_country&diff=prev&oldid=260257157 this one].  +++$+++ :::It was substantially populated yesterday and was emptied by bizarre edits such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wines_by_country&diff=prev&oldid=260257157 this one]. [[User:Occuli|Occuli]] ([[User talk:Occuli|talk]]) 17:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
533601 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533597 +++$+++ 533600 +++$+++ 2008-12-27 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.230439740E09 +++$+++ I can check the article's history but how can I check what was in the category yesterday? If the links are removed, I have no way of finding where they were (unless you knwo something I don't, in that case, please tell me the trick ;-) ) The category is restored now. Greetings to both. --''' +++$+++ :::: I can check the article's history but how can I check what was in the category yesterday? If the links are removed, I have no way of finding where they were (unless you knwo something I don't, in that case, please tell me the trick ;-) ) The category is restored now. Greetings to both. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
533602 +++$+++ Occuli +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533597 +++$+++ 533601 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.230545400E09 +++$+++ I don't know of any way of discovering earlier contents of categories except by scrutinising the edits of the would-be deleter. (One can empty categories and then wait 4 days and all is apparently fine ... not very satisfactory.)  +++$+++ ::::: I don't know of any way of discovering earlier contents of categories except by scrutinising the edits of the would-be deleter. (One can empty categories and then wait 4 days and all is apparently fine ... not very satisfactory.) [[User:Occuli|Occuli]] ([[User talk:Occuli|talk]]) 02:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
533603 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533597 +++$+++ 533597 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.230601140E09 +++$+++ Hi. This article was deleted in the prod process. I will restore it and send it to afd instead to gain a community consensus. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. This article was deleted in the prod process. I will restore it and send it to afd instead to gain a community consensus. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:39, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

9311 +++$+++ wbfergus +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9311 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-03 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.186191180E09 +++$+++ Be a '''lot''' more careful when you arbitrarily revert an article. The last one you did to the [[People's Volunteer Army]] erased a '''lot''' of very valid article additions, much more relevant and accurate than what you reverted back to. The part you opposed being removed is questionable at best, as it is NOT a valid reference. Just because it is a web page does not make it legitimate, verifiable, or accurate.  +++$+++ Be a '''lot''' more careful when you arbitrarily revert an article. The last one you did to the [[People's Volunteer Army]] erased a '''lot''' of very valid article additions, much more relevant and accurate than what you reverted back to. The part you opposed being removed is questionable at best, as it is NOT a valid reference. Just because it is a web page does not make it legitimate, verifiable, or accurate. [[User:wbfergus|wbfergus]] 18:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
9312 +++$+++ wbfergus +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9311 +++$+++ 9311 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.186191540E09 +++$+++ I almost forgot. There 'may' be a discrepency with the [[180th Division (People's Republic of China)]], as yesterday I did find another site that referred to the same debacle (complete division being lost) as the 88th division.<ref>[http:\/\/www.china-defense.com\/orbat\/pla_orbat\/pla_orbat_32.html Disbanded Divisions]<\/ref>  +++$+++ :I almost forgot. There 'may' be a discrepency with the [[180th Division (People's Republic of China)]], as yesterday I did find another site that referred to the same debacle (complete division being lost) as the 88th division.<ref>[http://www.china-defense.com/orbat/pla_orbat/pla_orbat_32.html Disbanded Divisions]</ref> [[User:wbfergus|wbfergus]] 18:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
9313 +++$+++ wbfergus +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9311 +++$+++ 9312 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.186191780E09 +++$+++ The site is questionable in that there are 1.) several obvious falshoods (the CPV did not invent bunker warfare) and 2.) it's really difficult to believe that anything with any historical accuracy or factualness could contain so many typos and grammatical errors.  There is no way anything subjected to true academic review by real historians could have been published in it's current form. It is merely a web page where somebody expressed their opinions.  +++$+++ ::The site is questionable in that there are 1.) several obvious falshoods (the CPV did not invent bunker warfare) and 2.) it's really difficult to believe that anything with any historical accuracy or factualness could contain so many typos and grammatical errors.  There is no way anything subjected to true academic review by real historians could have been published in it's current form. It is merely a web page where somebody expressed their opinions. [[User:wbfergus|wbfergus]] 18:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
9314 +++$+++ wbfergus +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9311 +++$+++ 9313 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.186192980E09 +++$+++ I say it's personal opinion because parts of it are obviously so, like the bunker war claim. No reputable historian would ever make a claim like that, as it's so blatantly false. Even if was meant to say \"reinvent\", it's still false. The exact same tactics were employed during WWI and the American Civil War, many years before the Korean War. Also, being linked to a discussion forum doesn't help it's legitimacy, but hurts it. Finally, it starts out question 1 by saying it used 6 main references, the last being listed as only \"Chinese references\" without qualification. All the rest of 'question\/answers' don't bother attempting to reference which 'source' a claim was made by, giving the whole site the appearance that the person read the listed references, then went back and created the 'answers' from memory, not by re-verifying the actual claim. I have used the site for some references though myself, but I am picky about the verifiable accuracy of what I refence from there.  +++$+++ :::I say it's personal opinion because parts of it are obviously so, like the bunker war claim. No reputable historian would ever make a claim like that, as it's so blatantly false. Even if was meant to say "reinvent", it's still false. The exact same tactics were employed during WWI and the American Civil War, many years before the Korean War. Also, being linked to a discussion forum doesn't help it's legitimacy, but hurts it. Finally, it starts out question 1 by saying it used 6 main references, the last being listed as only "Chinese references" without qualification. All the rest of 'question/answers' don't bother attempting to reference which 'source' a claim was made by, giving the whole site the appearance that the person read the listed references, then went back and created the 'answers' from memory, not by re-verifying the actual claim. I have used the site for some references though myself, but I am picky about the verifiable accuracy of what I refence from there. [[User:wbfergus|wbfergus]] 19:03, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
9315 +++$+++ wbfergus +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9311 +++$+++ 9314 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.186194000E09 +++$+++ I '''never''' claimed that Americans or the Europeans invented bunker warfare. All I did was say that they were ''used'' by the Americans and Europeans way before the Korean War, and the claim from the centurychina web site that \"During the truce talks, PVA invented the bunker war...\".  +++$+++ ::::I '''never''' claimed that Americans or the Europeans invented bunker warfare. All I did was say that they were ''used'' by the Americans and Europeans way before the Korean War, and the claim from the centurychina web site that "During the truce talks, PVA invented the bunker war...". [[User:wbfergus|wbfergus]] 19:20, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

271456 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271456 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-04 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.262592180E09 +++$+++ {{User Good Article|Arthur Eve}} Thanks for your involvement in the development of [[Arthur Eve]] which has become a [[WP:GA]] in recent months. --[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ {{User Good Article|Arthur Eve}} Thanks for your involvement in the development of [[Arthur Eve]] which has become a [[WP:GA]] in recent months. --[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 00:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
271457 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271456 +++$+++ 271456 +++$+++ 2010-01-04 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.262592660E09 +++$+++ Thank you, and congratulations! Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Thank you, and congratulations! Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

9316 +++$+++ Nat Krause +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9316 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-04 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.186281360E09 +++$+++ It is shameful and worthy of opprobrium that you are now at the point, not only of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Indigenous_peoples_of_the_Americas&diff=149182346&oldid=149181296 reverting without an edit summary], but of not even bothering to get basic grammar right. Why \"suffered mass killing from european colonist\" rather than \"suffered mass killing from European colonists\"?&mdash; +++$+++ It is shameful and worthy of opprobrium that you are now at the point, not only of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indigenous_peoples_of_the_Americas&diff=149182346&oldid=149181296 reverting without an edit summary], but of not even bothering to get basic grammar right. Why "suffered mass killing from european colonist" rather than "suffered mass killing from European colonists"?&mdash;[[User:Nat Krause|Nat Krause]]<sup>([[User talk:Nat Krause|Talk!]]·[[Special:Contributions/Nat Krause|What have I done?]])</sup> 19:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
9317 +++$+++ Nat Krause +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9316 +++$+++ 9316 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.186282800E09 +++$+++ Please put discussion of the merits of your edits on the article talk page.&mdsah; +++$+++ :Please put discussion of the merits of your edits on the article talk page.&mdsah;[[User:Nat Krause|Nat Krause]]<sup>([[User talk:Nat Krause|Talk!]]·[[Special:Contributions/Nat Krause|What have I done?]])</sup> 20:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
9318 +++$+++ Nat Krause +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9316 +++$+++ 9317 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.186283880E09 +++$+++ I didnt find the necessity to discuss.&mdash; +++$+++ ::I didnt find the necessity to discuss.&mdash;[[User:Nat Krause|Nat Krause]]<sup>([[User talk:Nat Krause|Talk!]]·[[Special:Contributions/Nat Krause|What have I done?]])</sup> 20:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
9319 +++$+++ Dylanfly +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9316 +++$+++ 9318 +++$+++ 2007-08-05 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.186307100E09 +++$+++ I think, Ksyrie, that your English is just not worthy of Wikipedia. And you seem to rely on mythology instead of citations.  It sounds like you've made some real contributions to pages about Chinese culture, but that you are harming other pages.  I think you could contribute on the discussion pages more and do less editing, at least until your English improves.  -- +++$+++ :::I think, Ksyrie, that your English is just not worthy of Wikipedia. And you seem to rely on mythology instead of citations.  It sounds like you've made some real contributions to pages about Chinese culture, but that you are harming other pages.  I think you could contribute on the discussion pages more and do less editing, at least until your English improves.  --[[User:Dylanfly|Dylanfly]] 02:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

271461 +++$+++ Candyo32 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-15 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.263552240E09 +++$+++ Hi! I didn't want to review the article, I just wanted to give my thoughts on it.  +++$+++ Hi! I didn't want to review the article, I just wanted to give my thoughts on it. [[User:Candyo32|Candyo32]] ([[User talk:Candyo32|talk]]) 02:44, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
271462 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271461 +++$+++ 271461 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.263600360E09 +++$+++ OK. Per your statement[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=337925960&oldid=337910252], I have removed your name as reviewer and noted on the review page that the review needs to be completed by another editor.  I commented on your talk page. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :OK. Per your statement[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=337925960&oldid=337910252], I have removed your name as reviewer and noted on the review page that the review needs to be completed by another editor.  I commented on your talk page. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

533606 +++$+++ BalkanFever +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533606 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-02 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.230883680E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone. If you have time would you be able to translate the Slovene passage in [[\u017dovnek Castle]]? Thank you. ''' +++$+++ Hi Tone. If you have time would you be able to translate the Slovene passage in [[Žovnek Castle]]? Thank you. '''[[User:BalkanFever|<font color="black">Balkan</font>]][[User talk:BalkanFever|<font color="#008">Fever</font>]]''' 00:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
533607 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533606 +++$+++ 533606 +++$+++ 2009-01-02 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.230924480E09 +++$+++ I did a radical cleanup since the content would need a complete rewrite and it didn't make much sense anyway. Translating the part in Slovene wouldn't help much... Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : I did a radical cleanup since the content would need a complete rewrite and it didn't make much sense anyway. Translating the part in Slovene wouldn't help much... Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
533608 +++$+++ BalkanFever +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533606 +++$+++ 533607 +++$+++ 2009-01-02 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.230924600E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. Thank you. ''' +++$+++ ::Fair enough. Thank you. '''[[User:BalkanFever|<font color="black">Balkan</font>]][[User talk:BalkanFever|<font color="#008">Fever</font>]]''' 11:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

271463 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-15 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.263552600E09 +++$+++ I saw the review and thought that I had addressed all of the concerns. I then left a message for the reviewer on Jan 10. Please take a look let me know what you think.  +++$+++ I saw the review and thought that I had addressed all of the concerns. I then left a message for the reviewer on Jan 10. Please take a look let me know what you think. [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 02:50, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
271464 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271463 +++$+++ 271463 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.263600960E09 +++$+++ I think that you should  address the points made at [[Talk:Illinois State Toll Highway Authority\/GA1]] to clarify what has been changed. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :I think that you should  address the points made at [[Talk:Illinois State Toll Highway Authority/GA1]] to clarify what has been changed. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
271465 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271463 +++$+++ 271464 +++$+++ 2010-01-16 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.263646260E09 +++$+++ Are there any that you feel that I have not addressed? I have worked hard to address all of them (and also left one comment of explanation), and appreciate any feedback that you may have.  +++$+++ ::Are there any that you feel that I have not addressed? I have worked hard to address all of them (and also left one comment of explanation), and appreciate any feedback that you may have. [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 04:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

9321 +++$+++ Ghostexorcist +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-07 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.186470120E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your kind comments about [[Zhou Tong (archer)]]. I would like to see the Chinese edition of his page greatly expanded. -- +++$+++ Thank you for your kind comments about [[Zhou Tong (archer)]]. I would like to see the Chinese edition of his page greatly expanded. --[[User:Ghostexorcist|Ghostexorcist]] 00:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
9322 +++$+++ Ghostexorcist +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9321 +++$+++ 9321 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.186471800E09 +++$+++ I am actually writing a research paper on Zhou's historical, folklore, literature, and martial arts references. But I won't publish until my Chinese greatly improves and I've had time to read over certain Chinese manuscripts. I believe Zhou's modern day image is a distinct fictional persona born from wuxia novels and folklore. -- +++$+++ :I am actually writing a research paper on Zhou's historical, folklore, literature, and martial arts references. But I won't publish until my Chinese greatly improves and I've had time to read over certain Chinese manuscripts. I believe Zhou's modern day image is a distinct fictional persona born from wuxia novels and folklore. --[[User:Ghostexorcist|Ghostexorcist]] 00:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
9323 +++$+++ Ghostexorcist +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9321 +++$+++ 9322 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.186503480E09 +++$+++ I used an internet translator to read the editors' comments. It does my heart good to see that others enjoy my work. I am an okay writer, but I really pride myself in my research. Thanks for showing me that link. -- +++$+++ ::I used an internet translator to read the editors' comments. It does my heart good to see that others enjoy my work. I am an okay writer, but I really pride myself in my research. Thanks for showing me that link. --[[User:Ghostexorcist|Ghostexorcist]] 09:18, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

533610 +++$+++ Friginator +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533610 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-05 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.231154160E09 +++$+++ Hey, Tone. I was wondering why you deleted ''[[List of limited series]].'' I know it's been a few months since you deleted it, but I hadn't realized until now. I had always found it helpful in keeping track of different limited series, and was disappointed it was deleted (from things it had been deleted and restored before, too). I know that the list itself would be far too long for one article, but if it was split into seperate parts and alphabitized, it would be a very helpful resource. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hey, Tone. I was wondering why you deleted ''[[List of limited series]].'' I know it's been a few months since you deleted it, but I hadn't realized until now. I had always found it helpful in keeping track of different limited series, and was disappointed it was deleted (from things it had been deleted and restored before, too). I know that the list itself would be far too long for one article, but if it was split into seperate parts and alphabitized, it would be a very helpful resource. Thanks. [[User:Friginator|Friginator]] ([[User talk:Friginator|talk]]) 03:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
533611 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533610 +++$+++ 533610 +++$+++ 2009-01-05 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.231184580E09 +++$+++ Hi. That was a prod deletion. Probably the reasonable thing to do is to restore it and send it over AfD to get a consensus from the community. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. That was a prod deletion. Probably the reasonable thing to do is to restore it and send it over AfD to get a consensus from the community. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

271467 +++$+++ Nikkimaria +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-15 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.263545460E09 +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, I noticed you transcluded the GA review at [[Talk:World War II]]. It's actually already transcluded further up on the page, so I've undone yours. Thanks anyways though! Cheers,  +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, I noticed you transcluded the GA review at [[Talk:World War II]]. It's actually already transcluded further up on the page, so I've undone yours. Thanks anyways though! Cheers, [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 00:51, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
271468 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271467 +++$+++ 271467 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.263545580E09 +++$+++ OK. Sorry about that!  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :OK. Sorry about that!  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
271469 +++$+++ Nikkimaria +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271467 +++$+++ 271468 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.263851400E09 +++$+++ Oh, and it turns out you also transcluded the WWII GA review at the Ulysses S. Grant talk page [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AUlysses_S._Grant_presidential_administration_scandals&action=historysubmit&diff=337875508&oldid=334467299#GA_Review here]. I've also undone that. Happy editing! Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Oh, and it turns out you also transcluded the WWII GA review at the Ulysses S. Grant talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AUlysses_S._Grant_presidential_administration_scandals&action=historysubmit&diff=337875508&oldid=334467299#GA_Review here]. I've also undone that. Happy editing! Cheers, [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 13:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

533612 +++$+++ Helenabogdan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533612 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-06 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.231294380E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Helenabogdan|Helenabogdan]] ([[User talk:Helenabogdan|talk]]) 18:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
533613 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533612 +++$+++ 533612 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.231304400E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted because there was no meaningful content there yet so there's not much to restore. You start the article with clicking at the red link and the edit window should open. I don't know what are the errors you receive but may be something connected with your fresh account, I remember that very new accounts can't create articles for a couple of days. If this is the case, it should be ok in a day or two. If the problem persists, you can write the intro of the article to my talkpage and I will move it to the article, then it should be possible to edit it. I hope this helps. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted because there was no meaningful content there yet so there's not much to restore. You start the article with clicking at the red link and the edit window should open. I don't know what are the errors you receive but may be something connected with your fresh account, I remember that very new accounts can't create articles for a couple of days. If this is the case, it should be ok in a day or two. If the problem persists, you can write the intro of the article to my talkpage and I will move it to the article, then it should be possible to edit it. I hope this helps. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

271470 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-17 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.263783240E09 +++$+++ For whatever this is worth, I trust your edits to this article and am not deliberately editing over you. I'm not keeping track of who is inserting what as edits are being made too quickly. I apologize if we're conflicting. I appreciate what you are doing and I am glad we are working toward a common goal. -- +++$+++ For whatever this is worth, I trust your edits to this article and am not deliberately editing over you. I'm not keeping track of who is inserting what as edits are being made too quickly. I apologize if we're conflicting. I appreciate what you are doing and I am glad we are working toward a common goal. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 18:54, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
271471 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271470 +++$+++ 271470 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.263783480E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the message. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Thank you for the message. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 18:58, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

438461 +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ 438461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-27 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.138406700E09 +++$+++ Don't bother to continue adding notices to my talk page about images of Canadian government politicians whose status are in question because of legal issues. I have given up trying to fight for legal use of these images against Wikipedia so this issue is now no longer my problem.  +++$+++ Don't bother to continue adding notices to my talk page about images of Canadian government politicians whose status are in question because of legal issues. I have given up trying to fight for legal use of these images against Wikipedia so this issue is now no longer my problem. [[User:SD6-Agent|SD6-Agent]] 16:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
438462 +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ SD6-Agent +++$+++ 438461 +++$+++ 438461 +++$+++ 2006-01-28 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.138452780E09 +++$+++ You've been added to the \"do not notify\" list. -- +++$+++ :You've been added to the "do not notify" list. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] 04:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

271472 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271472 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-17 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.263793680E09 +++$+++ I'm impressed by the collaborative work on this article about an unfolding disaster. However, such articles also generate stresses and frustrations. While [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3A2010_Haiti_earthquake&action=historysubmit&diff=338417442&oldid=338416609 this edit] raises issues about selective use of source material, it isn't phrased in a way conducive to collaboration. In particular, the suggestion of article ownership in the last sentence is inappropriate and unhelpful in this context, as well as being contrary to your plan: I advise striking it. Thanks, '' +++$+++ I'm impressed by the collaborative work on this article about an unfolding disaster. However, such articles also generate stresses and frustrations. While [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3A2010_Haiti_earthquake&action=historysubmit&diff=338417442&oldid=338416609 this edit] raises issues about selective use of source material, it isn't phrased in a way conducive to collaboration. In particular, the suggestion of article ownership in the last sentence is inappropriate and unhelpful in this context, as well as being contrary to your plan: I advise striking it. Thanks, ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 21:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
271473 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271472 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.263793980E09 +++$+++ Done. \u2014 +++$+++ :*Done. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
271474 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271472 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.263794400E09 +++$+++ Thanks. If you would like any further clarifications about the spirit of good collaboration in this context, let me know. '' +++$+++ ::* Thanks. If you would like any further clarifications about the spirit of good collaboration in this context, let me know. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 22:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
271475 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271472 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.263794520E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I have struck all comments and I will not contribute further to the article. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::*Thank you. I have struck all comments and I will not contribute further to the article. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:02, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
271476 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271472 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.263794820E09 +++$+++ Why have you struck all comments? Slow down Mattisse: it is this kind of rapid over-reaction that you have to guard against. '' +++$+++ ::::*Why have you struck all comments? Slow down Mattisse: it is this kind of rapid over-reaction that you have to guard against. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 22:07, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
271477 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271472 +++$+++ 271472 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.263795000E09 +++$+++ <outdent added> Because it is wrong to become involved in articles.  I made a mistake in doing so, but thank you for reminding me.  Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ *<outdent added> Because it is wrong to become involved in articles.  I made a mistake in doing so, but thank you for reminding me.  Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
271478 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271472 +++$+++ 271477 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.263795600E09 +++$+++ It isn't wrong to become involved in articles, as long as you are able to step back to see the encyclopedic perspective, and avoid personalizing disagreements. You've contributed a lot to this article and have done so primarily with the needs of the encyclopedia in mind, so you should feel good about that. If you need to step away for a bit and do other things, that is fine: you don't have to make statements about your future plans. '' +++$+++ :*It isn't wrong to become involved in articles, as long as you are able to step back to see the encyclopedic perspective, and avoid personalizing disagreements. You've contributed a lot to this article and have done so primarily with the needs of the encyclopedia in mind, so you should feel good about that. If you need to step away for a bit and do other things, that is fine: you don't have to make statements about your future plans. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 22:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
271479 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271472 +++$+++ 271478 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.263795960E09 +++$+++ Yes, I made many fine contributions to the article, but that was a mistake on my part and I regret that I did so. I am making an effort not to contribute in substance   but I made a mistake in this situation. I hugely regret it. I hope I know better now.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::*Yes, I made many fine contributions to the article, but that was a mistake on my part and I regret that I did so. I am making an effort not to contribute in substance   but I made a mistake in this situation. I hugely regret it. I hope I know better now.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
271480 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271472 +++$+++ 271479 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.263796500E09 +++$+++ You will have a better perspective to evaluate your contributions and experience in a few days. '' +++$+++ :::*You will have a better perspective to evaluate your contributions and experience in a few days. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 22:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
271481 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271472 +++$+++ 271479 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.263796860E09 +++$+++ *Yes, I have removed  it from my watchlist and will not follow it. It will become an unhappy memory that hopefully will fade. But it will help me not to make that mistake again.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::: *Yes, I have removed  it from my watchlist and will not follow it. It will become an unhappy memory that hopefully will fade. But it will help me not to make that mistake again.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

533618 +++$+++ MJN SEIFER +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-11 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.231720560E09 +++$+++ I realize it can be seen as Original Research without sources, I '''know''' it's true what I have put, but I don't know how to prove it other thsan telling other wikiers to watch the film, that's why I said it it needed sources, as a more professional memeber might know where to find some, but I had to put it in to let them know - is that ok?  I will wait before I edit the page with it again.  +++$+++ I realize it can be seen as Original Research without sources, I '''know''' it's true what I have put, but I don't know how to prove it other thsan telling other wikiers to watch the film, that's why I said it it needed sources, as a more professional memeber might know where to find some, but I had to put it in to let them know - is that ok?  I will wait before I edit the page with it again. [[User:MJN SEIFER|MJN SEIFER]] ([[User talk:MJN SEIFER|talk]]) 16:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
533619 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533618 +++$+++ 533618 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.231726680E09 +++$+++ Hi. Ok, let's have a look where the problem is. ''He is often erroneously believed to be the cause of the accident by some of the fans[who?], because he dropped his camera shortly before the deaths started.[citation needed] However, when one watches the premonition closely, it becomes clear that the roller-coaster was already starting to collapse before he dropped it, meaning it that he only caused slightly more damage to the ride, making the deaths happen slightly sooner than they would have done.'' He is believed by fans? Ok, if this is published somewhere, fine, but otherwise this has no place in the article, true or not. Refering solely to what can be seen in the movie is also so-so, you probably won't find a reference to that, except if one of the filmers noted this somewhere (blog?) like ''Ok, we were deciding what to do with the guy and we said..., let's put this in the script'' ... Kind of. Really, the article is supposed to give a brief plot summary and production info, box office responde and things like this. A detailed analysis and interpretation are not supposed to be in the article. I hope this helps. Happy editing in the future ;-) --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Ok, let's have a look where the problem is. ''He is often erroneously believed to be the cause of the accident by some of the fans[who?], because he dropped his camera shortly before the deaths started.[citation needed] However, when one watches the premonition closely, it becomes clear that the roller-coaster was already starting to collapse before he dropped it, meaning it that he only caused slightly more damage to the ride, making the deaths happen slightly sooner than they would have done.'' He is believed by fans? Ok, if this is published somewhere, fine, but otherwise this has no place in the article, true or not. Refering solely to what can be seen in the movie is also so-so, you probably won't find a reference to that, except if one of the filmers noted this somewhere (blog?) like ''Ok, we were deciding what to do with the guy and we said..., let's put this in the script'' ... Kind of. Really, the article is supposed to give a brief plot summary and production info, box office responde and things like this. A detailed analysis and interpretation are not supposed to be in the article. I hope this helps. Happy editing in the future ;-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

9332 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-26 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.188175980E09 +++$+++ I will have to remove the footnote if you insist on changing it as that is not what the newspaper I am using as a source says. A newspaper is a better source per [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] than the site you reference. Regards,  +++$+++ I will have to remove the footnote if you insist on changing it as that is not what the newspaper I am using as a source says. A newspaper is a better source per [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] than the site you reference. Regards, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 17:53, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
9333 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9332 +++$+++ 9332 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.188176520E09 +++$+++ They may have made a mistake, but remember that Wikipedia's policy is not \"truth\" but \"verifiability\". If you cannot find a reliable, unbiased, third-party source, then the material can be removed by any editor. Regards,  +++$+++ :They may have made a mistake, but remember that Wikipedia's policy is not "truth" but "verifiability". If you cannot find a reliable, unbiased, third-party source, then the material can be removed by any editor. Regards, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 18:02, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
9334 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9332 +++$+++ 9333 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.188176700E09 +++$+++ The article you suggest has no references so it does not matter what it says.  Regards, -- +++$+++ ::The article you suggest has no references so it does not matter what it says.  Regards, --[[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 18:05, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
9335 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9332 +++$+++ 9334 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.188177420E09 +++$+++ The fact is that the term \"South Tibet\" is hardly ever used, except when talking about geology. I was lucky to find that one reference. Believe me, I have looked through Google books and the term is not used consistently, even in the same article. South Tibet is capitalized when it is a title but rarely in the text of an article is it used with capital letter.  Regards,  +++$+++ :::The fact is that the term "South Tibet" is hardly ever used, except when talking about geology. I was lucky to find that one reference. Believe me, I have looked through Google books and the term is not used consistently, even in the same article. South Tibet is capitalized when it is a title but rarely in the text of an article is it used with capital letter.  Regards, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 18:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

533621 +++$+++ Chrisjnelson +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-12 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.231806660E09 +++$+++ Please don't delete articles of notable NFL players, as you did at [[Josh Bell]]. You really need to be more careful.\u25ba''' +++$+++ Please don't delete articles of notable NFL players, as you did at [[Josh Bell]]. You really need to be more careful.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #DF6108">Nelson</span>]]'''<sup>''[[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Holla!]]''</sup> 16:31, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
533622 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533621 +++$+++ 533621 +++$+++ 2009-01-12 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.231821900E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted in a deletion discussion back in April. Deleted articles should first gain a consensus to recreate, not just be reposted. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted in a deletion discussion back in April. Deleted articles should first gain a consensus to recreate, not just be reposted. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

533624 +++$+++ EdJohnston +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533624 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-13 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.231882500E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone. Wouldn't it be logical to have the new 'oldafdfull' template on the new location of the Talk page? I.e. at [[Talk:Edward Owens]]. It just looks unusual to have an oldafdfull sitting on a redirect.  +++$+++ Hi Tone. Wouldn't it be logical to have the new 'oldafdfull' template on the new location of the Talk page? I.e. at [[Talk:Edward Owens]]. It just looks unusual to have an oldafdfull sitting on a redirect. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 13:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
533625 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533624 +++$+++ 533624 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.231887180E09 +++$+++ Indeed. Thank you for fixing it. --''' +++$+++ : Indeed. Thank you for fixing it. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

271482 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-17 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.263800640E09 +++$+++ (outdent) Mattisse, best, always, not to react in anger. I quick look shows you're doing a fine job on the article and other editors appear to appreciate that. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater (not perfect in this situation, but a useful metaphor anyway!). -- +++$+++ (outdent) Mattisse, best, always, not to react in anger. I quick look shows you're doing a fine job on the article and other editors appear to appreciate that. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater (not perfect in this situation, but a useful metaphor anyway!). --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 23:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
271483 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.263800880E09 +++$+++ Geometry guy  reminded me how dangerous it was to comment. I am not reacting out of anger but rather out of fear. I have struck all comments. Hopefully this will put this incident to rest and it will not need to be spoken of again. I will  avoid any future active involvement in articles. I am trying not to make any substantive contributions. I having no longer been doing reviews of any sort, nor participating in FAC, FAR or GAN reviews. I have not been copy editing articles as I did in the past. I did participate in DYK but I will avoid that for now.  It was a mistake on my part, a lapse from my policy to get involved. Regretfully, \u2014 +++$+++ :*Geometry guy  reminded me how dangerous it was to comment. I am not reacting out of anger but rather out of fear. I have struck all comments. Hopefully this will put this incident to rest and it will not need to be spoken of again. I will  avoid any future active involvement in articles. I am trying not to make any substantive contributions. I having no longer been doing reviews of any sort, nor participating in FAC, FAR or GAN reviews. I have not been copy editing articles as I did in the past. I did participate in DYK but I will avoid that for now.  It was a mistake on my part, a lapse from my policy to get involved. Regretfully, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
271484 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.263802260E09 +++$+++ <'''IMPORTANT'''>It is not dangerous to comment; problems arise when you act in haste. I have undone your precipitous strikes. For your own protection and that of the encyclopedia, I am banning you from editing [[2010 Haiti earthquake]] and its talk page for 36 hours from this timestamp. I hope this will provide you time to think about the matter with more perspective. I expect you will follow this ban; you may be blocked if you do not. Thanks, '' +++$+++ ::***<'''IMPORTANT'''>It is not dangerous to comment; problems arise when you act in haste. I have undone your precipitous strikes. For your own protection and that of the encyclopedia, I am banning you from editing [[2010 Haiti earthquake]] and its talk page for 36 hours from this timestamp. I hope this will provide you time to think about the matter with more perspective. I expect you will follow this ban; you may be blocked if you do not. Thanks, ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 00:11, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271485 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.263802620E09 +++$+++ <outdent added> I guess I have no choice in anything, not even in withdrawing comments. I will try to be very careful not to get involved in anything else that may bring attention in the future.  I am avoiding any substantive contributions and will continue to do so, so as not to bring attention. This incident was a horrible mistake. I deeply regret that I contributed so much to the article. I learn from this to avoid contributions. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ *<outdent added> I guess I have no choice in anything, not even in withdrawing comments. I will try to be very careful not to get involved in anything else that may bring attention in the future.  I am avoiding any substantive contributions and will continue to do so, so as not to bring attention. This incident was a horrible mistake. I deeply regret that I contributed so much to the article. I learn from this to avoid contributions. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271486 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ 271485 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.263804540E09 +++$+++ You always have many choices, including the choice to wait. '' +++$+++ :*You always have many choices, including the choice to wait. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 00:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271487 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ 271486 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.263804720E09 +++$+++ Does that mean that I can withdraw the comments at a future date? Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::*Does that mean that I can withdraw the comments at a future date? Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271488 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ 271487 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.263805380E09 +++$+++ Whenever you make a comment (or any contribution to Wikipedia) you agree in the edit window to release it under the Creative-Commons-Share-Alike and GFDL licenses. As such it cannot be withdrawn. Striking comments is typically a courtesy to other editors; it cannot be used to prevent reuse or further comment. If you want to strike comments in the future, discuss it with your advisors. '' +++$+++ :::*Whenever you make a comment (or any contribution to Wikipedia) you agree in the edit window to release it under the Creative-Commons-Share-Alike and GFDL licenses. As such it cannot be withdrawn. Striking comments is typically a courtesy to other editors; it cannot be used to prevent reuse or further comment. If you want to strike comments in the future, discuss it with your advisors. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 01:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271489 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.263805680E09 +++$+++ So when you tell me to strike a comment, I actually cannot do that, except as a courtesy? I will remember that in the future, that I cannot strike comments at will. Could you provide documentation that comments cannot be struck? Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::::*So when you tell me to strike a comment, I actually cannot do that, except as a courtesy? I will remember that in the future, that I cannot strike comments at will. Could you provide documentation that comments cannot be struck? Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:08, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271490 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.263805920E09 +++$+++ Semantics. Of course you can strike a comment, but every edit is recorded in the edit history, <s>including this one.<\/s> '' +++$+++ ::::::::*Semantics. Of course you can strike a comment, but every edit is recorded in the edit history, <s>including this one.</s> ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 01:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271491 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.263806280E09 +++$+++ *Of course I know that. So what could you mean that striking comments is a courtesy? I guess the safest route for me is to make no comments. I will resist engaging, contributing, and in any way becoming involved in an article. Meanwhile, apparently I am banned from the one article that I make substantive contributions to! Lesson learned. Do not make substantive contributions, and do not make substantive comments. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::::::: *Of course I know that. So what could you mean that striking comments is a courtesy? I guess the safest route for me is to make no comments. I will resist engaging, contributing, and in any way becoming involved in an article. Meanwhile, apparently I am banned from the one article that I make substantive contributions to! Lesson learned. Do not make substantive contributions, and do not make substantive comments. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271492 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.263806940E09 +++$+++ Striking comments is a courtesy because it is a widely respected form of deescalation: \"I know I said that, but on reflection, I wish I hadn't\". You are only banned for 36 hours (now 35) and only from a page which you said you never wanted to contribute to again, so that's no hardship. Quit complaining. '' +++$+++ ::::::::::*Striking comments is a courtesy because it is a widely respected form of deescalation: "I know I said that, but on reflection, I wish I hadn't". You are only banned for 36 hours (now 35) and only from a page which you said you never wanted to contribute to again, so that's no hardship. Quit complaining. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 01:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271493 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271482 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.263811680E09 +++$+++ Quite confusing and makes no sense to me! I will disregard the whole thing and wait the 36 hours to strike my comments. I am complaining that I cannot contribute to an article in which my contributions have been acknowledged as substantive, without getting my head chopped over. Wow, and just more wow.  I am glad to learn that my contributions are not wanted on Wikipedia. That is very clear.  It furthers my resolve to avoid any substantive contributions, as it is apparent that Wikipedia does not value what I do. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::::::::*Quite confusing and makes no sense to me! I will disregard the whole thing and wait the 36 hours to strike my comments. I am complaining that I cannot contribute to an article in which my contributions have been acknowledged as substantive, without getting my head chopped over. Wow, and just more wow.  I am glad to learn that my contributions are not wanted on Wikipedia. That is very clear.  It furthers my resolve to avoid any substantive contributions, as it is apparent that Wikipedia does not value what I do. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

9339 +++$+++ Dongwenliang +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-09 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.191985080E09 +++$+++ I found it is a violation of the spirit of neutral point of view, by showing a dead Chinese soldier with clear face identify while showing an US soldier on his back. How about the delist of this bloody image? It is hard to believe such a bloody picture was nominated as a \"featured\" picture. Is wikipedia funded by US National Defence? +++$+++ I found it is a violation of the spirit of neutral point of view, by showing a dead Chinese soldier with clear face identify while showing an US soldier on his back. How about the delist of this bloody image? It is hard to believe such a bloody picture was nominated as a "featured" picture. Is wikipedia funded by US National Defence?[[User:Dongwenliang|Dongwenliang]] 19:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
9340 +++$+++ Kfc1864 +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9339 +++$+++ 9339 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 05:53:00 +++$+++ 1.192107180E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but Wikipdia is not funded by anyone but ordinary people.  +++$+++ :I'm sorry, but Wikipdia is not funded by anyone but ordinary people. [[User:Kfc1864|<font color="blue">Kfc</font><font color="green">1864</font>]] [[User talk:Kfc1864|<font color="red">talk</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kfc1864|<sub><font color="yellow">my edits</font></sub>]] 05:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

533629 +++$+++ Kendrick7 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533629 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-21 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.232606700E09 +++$+++ Never mind, I found it; you should leave a link in the comment field next time though. I'll try and fix the incoming link I found.... --  +++$+++ Never mind, I found it; you should leave a link in the comment field next time though. I'll try and fix the incoming link I found.... -- [[User:Kendrick7|Kendrick7]]<sup>[[User_talk:Kendrick7|talk]]</sup> 22:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
533630 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533629 +++$+++ 533629 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.232606820E09 +++$+++ Hi. Yep, that was that time when the automatic summaries were not working. I suppose you see where the problem with the article was, no real content. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Yep, that was that time when the automatic summaries were not working. I suppose you see where the problem with the article was, no real content. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

533633 +++$+++ Schuym1 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.232922360E09 +++$+++ I added the reviews to the article.  +++$+++ I added the reviews to the article. [[User:Schuym1|Schuym1]] ([[User talk:Schuym1|talk]]) 14:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
533634 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533633 +++$+++ 533633 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.232922420E09 +++$+++ Thanks, much better now :-) --''' +++$+++ : Thanks, much better now :-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

533635 +++$+++ EVS3000 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.232929800E09 +++$+++ You recently deleted an article I posted http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_6ps_of_luxury_marketing. I believe the reasoning behind the deletion was because the original link I posted for the article went to a registration page. The actual link to the paper is http:\/\/winsper.com\/documents\/Win_whitepaper4.18.pdf. I believe this paper contains relevant factual information that would be beneficial to other marketers especially marketers that focus on the luxury sector. The findings in the paper are based on 350 online surveys of luxury marketers (all presidents or VP's of luxury brands) that belong to the luxury marketing council http:\/\/luxurycouncil.com\/aboutlmc. There are also numerous sources in the reference section of the paper itself. Can you please tell me what my best course for action is? Should I propose a deletion review? This is the first article I have written so I'm not exactly sure what I should do. Thanks for you time.  +++$+++ You recently deleted an article I posted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_6ps_of_luxury_marketing. I believe the reasoning behind the deletion was because the original link I posted for the article went to a registration page. The actual link to the paper is http://winsper.com/documents/Win_whitepaper4.18.pdf. I believe this paper contains relevant factual information that would be beneficial to other marketers especially marketers that focus on the luxury sector. The findings in the paper are based on 350 online surveys of luxury marketers (all presidents or VP's of luxury brands) that belong to the luxury marketing council http://luxurycouncil.com/aboutlmc. There are also numerous sources in the reference section of the paper itself. Can you please tell me what my best course for action is? Should I propose a deletion review? This is the first article I have written so I'm not exactly sure what I should do. Thanks for you time. [[User:EVS3000|EVS3000]] ([[User talk:EVS3000|talk]]) 16:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
533636 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533635 +++$+++ 533635 +++$+++ 2009-01-25 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.232938200E09 +++$+++ Hi. There were some issues with the article... They are all written in the deletion nomination. There are two options now. If you think the article as it was was ok, you can take it to deletion review and state your arguments there. Otherwise, you can try with rewriting the article so that it will follow the guidelines. I hope this helps. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. There were some issues with the article... They are all written in the deletion nomination. There are two options now. If you think the article as it was was ok, you can take it to deletion review and state your arguments there. Otherwise, you can try with rewriting the article so that it will follow the guidelines. I hope this helps. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

9349 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9349 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-12 09:27:00 +++$+++ 1.213288020E09 +++$+++ Please don't change the date of Chinese writing to 6000BCE. It's only known from 1300BCE, and the objects you're changing the date for are also from c. 1300BCE.  +++$+++ Please don't change the date of Chinese writing to 6000BCE. It's only known from 1300BCE, and the objects you're changing the date for are also from c. 1300BCE. [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 09:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
9350 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9349 +++$+++ 9349 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.213301640E09 +++$+++ Proto-writing, yes. But the pic does not show the Jiahu artifacts.  +++$+++ :Proto-writing, yes. But the pic does not show the Jiahu artifacts. [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 13:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

271494 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-18 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.263810960E09 +++$+++ I have made nothing but positive (constructive) edits to the article. Indeed, my adittions with references have straightened out may confusions.  But because I was directed to strke out comments to the talk page and did so, I am banned from the article? As I have stated, I have no intention of every contributing to the article again, but what is the logic to this ban? Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ I have made nothing but positive (constructive) edits to the article. Indeed, my adittions with references have straightened out may confusions.  But because I was directed to strke out comments to the talk page and did so, I am banned from the article? As I have stated, I have no intention of every contributing to the article again, but what is the logic to this ban? Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271495 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271494 +++$+++ 271494 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.263841500E09 +++$+++ Take your time to read and reflect before you reply. '' +++$+++ : Take your time to read and reflect before you reply. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 11:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271496 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271494 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.263859740E09 +++$+++ I feel that Geometry guy's actions are self-explanatory. I support what Geometry guy has done, and while I understand and sympathise with Mattisse's frustration - as we are all capable of getting over-involved in an article - I feel she knows that her original comment was inappropriate, and that her later actions and comments were over-reaction, and that this is the danger zone for her. When angry and frustrated like this, the most appropriate solution is to log off and cool down. Easier said than done - but it '''has''' to be done. As the solution is to cool off, I will not engage in further discussion on this matter either here or off-line until next month. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :::I feel that Geometry guy's actions are self-explanatory. I support what Geometry guy has done, and while I understand and sympathise with Mattisse's frustration - as we are all capable of getting over-involved in an article - I feel she knows that her original comment was inappropriate, and that her later actions and comments were over-reaction, and that this is the danger zone for her. When angry and frustrated like this, the most appropriate solution is to log off and cool down. Easier said than done - but it '''has''' to be done. As the solution is to cool off, I will not engage in further discussion on this matter either here or off-line until next month. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 16:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271497 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271494 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.263884460E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your comment [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Alerts&diff=prev&oldid=338598216] It gives me solace. I wish you had not removed it, as I think it sheds the clearest light. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::Thank you for your comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Alerts&diff=prev&oldid=338598216] It gives me solace. I wish you had not removed it, as I think it sheds the clearest light. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

533640 +++$+++ NE2 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-26 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.233029040E09 +++$+++ You deleted [[Danforth Carhouse and Bus Garage]], [[Birchmount Bus Garage]], and [[Eglinton Bus Garage]], citing [[WP:SNOW]]. I'm objecting to this, since these often do have history, and can be merged into a list like [[Bus depots of the New York City Transit Authority]] if necessary. (Note also that these were originally closed by  +++$+++ You deleted [[Danforth Carhouse and Bus Garage]], [[Birchmount Bus Garage]], and [[Eglinton Bus Garage]], citing [[WP:SNOW]]. I'm objecting to this, since these often do have history, and can be merged into a list like [[Bus depots of the New York City Transit Authority]] if necessary. (Note also that these were originally closed by [[User:MBisanz|MBisanz]], reopened, and then closed by you.) --[[User talk:NE2|NE2]] 20:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
533641 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533640 +++$+++ 533640 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.233030420E09 +++$+++ I am not sure why those were deleted and restored afterwards... Well, what shall we do here? Maybe I can restore the articles and put it under a single AfD nomination since the case is the same for all of them? Given the fact that you have not participated in the debate so if you can present your arguments it would not be WP:SNOW. Fine with you? Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : I am not sure why those were deleted and restored afterwards... Well, what shall we do here? Maybe I can restore the articles and put it under a single AfD nomination since the case is the same for all of them? Given the fact that you have not participated in the debate so if you can present your arguments it would not be WP:SNOW. Fine with you? Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
533642 +++$+++ NE2 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533640 +++$+++ 533641 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.233031440E09 +++$+++ I haven't participated because I didn't get a chance to [[Image:718smiley.svg|20px]] They should probably get a new AFD, since it's been a few days. -- +++$+++ ::I haven't participated because I didn't get a chance to [[Image:718smiley.svg|20px]] They should probably get a new AFD, since it's been a few days. --[[User talk:NE2|NE2]] 20:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
533643 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533640 +++$+++ 533642 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.233032220E09 +++$+++ Relisted. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ ::: Relisted. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
533644 +++$+++ NE2 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533640 +++$+++ 533643 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.233033420E09 +++$+++ Thank you. -- +++$+++ ::::Thank you. --[[User talk:NE2|NE2]] 21:17, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
533645 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533640 +++$+++ 533640 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.233183180E09 +++$+++ Hi. That deletion was done in the prod process. I will recreate the article and send it to AfD, you can address the issues during the process. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. That deletion was done in the prod process. I will recreate the article and send it to AfD, you can address the issues during the process. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

271498 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-18 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.263873300E09 +++$+++ Since I suspect G guy is busy trying to fix the issues on the Alert page, the link you requested is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=338459988&oldid=338456764 here.]   +++$+++ Since I suspect G guy is busy trying to fix the issues on the Alert page, the link you requested is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=338459988&oldid=338456764 here.]  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
271499 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271498 +++$+++ 271498 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.263873540E09 +++$+++ I had removed my request from G guy's page, so your post on my page is unnecessary.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :I had removed my request from G guy's page, so your post on my page is unnecessary.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

271500 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271500 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-19 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.263888060E09 +++$+++ Some reply. I have ceased following the article and sources, and since it would take a lot of work to update myself, I am willing to avoid editing the article. The \"lead editor\" has a view with which I disagree, so it is better to let that view prevail. Thus I wish to strike all my comments. I am deeply regretful that I ever contributed to the article and wish I could remove my contributions as well, but of course I know I cannot. As far as not seeing your comments, I have a severe eyesight problem and when comments are not well formated for reading, I have difficulty. Thus, you ban notice is still hard for me to find. Regarding \"wow\", I have seen that used many times effectively by other editors and so I copied it. It is a common device on Wikipedia. Please point out any questions that I have not answered. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ Some reply. I have ceased following the article and sources, and since it would take a lot of work to update myself, I am willing to avoid editing the article. The "lead editor" has a view with which I disagree, so it is better to let that view prevail. Thus I wish to strike all my comments. I am deeply regretful that I ever contributed to the article and wish I could remove my contributions as well, but of course I know I cannot. As far as not seeing your comments, I have a severe eyesight problem and when comments are not well formated for reading, I have difficulty. Thus, you ban notice is still hard for me to find. Regarding "wow", I have seen that used many times effectively by other editors and so I copied it. It is a common device on Wikipedia. Please point out any questions that I have not answered. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
271501 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271500 +++$+++ 271500 +++$+++ 2010-01-19 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.263945960E09 +++$+++ I have a great deal of sympathy for your poor eyesight. If you could explain when you find posts hard to read, that would be helpful to your advisors. There is browser technology available (large print, screen readers and the like) to help you contribute. Members of [[WP:WPACCESS]] may be able to provide further advice. The bottom line here, though, is that you should not be writing in response to discussions which you have not been able to read. '' +++$+++ : I have a great deal of sympathy for your poor eyesight. If you could explain when you find posts hard to read, that would be helpful to your advisors. There is browser technology available (large print, screen readers and the like) to help you contribute. Members of [[WP:WPACCESS]] may be able to provide further advice. The bottom line here, though, is that you should not be writing in response to discussions which you have not been able to read. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 16:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
271502 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271500 +++$+++ 271501 +++$+++ 2010-01-19 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.263972480E09 +++$+++ It would be helpful if you bolded starred, made big, or in some other way made the \"ban\" comment stand out. As it is, I have difficulty even now finding it. I use \"find\" in my browser now that I know the operative word is \"banning\". Before I searched for \"banned\" and could not find it. If I dared, I would refactor it so I can find it easily.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::It would be helpful if you bolded starred, made big, or in some other way made the "ban" comment stand out. As it is, I have difficulty even now finding it. I use "find" in my browser now that I know the operative word is "banning". Before I searched for "banned" and could not find it. If I dared, I would refactor it so I can find it easily.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:28, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
271503 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271500 +++$+++ 271500 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.264004040E09 +++$+++ Hi, Mattisse, excuse for butting in, but there's a simply technique that often mitigation visual difficulties without technologies - hold the CTRL key and press the + keys 1-3 times; and if you go too far, use hold the CTRL key and press the - key to reduce the size. It changes the displayed size of both text and pictures, and I know this works for Internet Explorer, Firefox and Opera. -- +++$+++ :Hi, Mattisse, excuse for butting in, but there's a simply technique that often mitigation visual difficulties without technologies - hold the CTRL key and press the + keys 1-3 times; and if you go too far, use hold the CTRL key and press the - key to reduce the size. It changes the displayed size of both text and pictures, and I know this works for Internet Explorer, Firefox and Opera. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 08:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
271504 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271500 +++$+++ 271503 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.264034880E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but I already do use that technique. It is a formating issue. The info is buried in a series of one line replies. When text is not formatted so important stuff is emphasized it is a forest and tress problem. Plus, the whole thread is confusing and doesn't make sense to me. Apparently, one is not really allowed to strike comments on an article talk but only as a courtesy. I don't understand what is being said.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::Thanks, but I already do use that technique. It is a formating issue. The info is buried in a series of one line replies. When text is not formatted so important stuff is emphasized it is a forest and tress problem. Plus, the whole thread is confusing and doesn't make sense to me. Apparently, one is not really allowed to strike comments on an article talk but only as a courtesy. I don't understand what is being said.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
271505 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271500 +++$+++ 271500 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.264049880E09 +++$+++ I have highlighted above a paragraph that is particularly important. It is better to try to understand this than whether there are rules for striking comments, and what they might be. One of the foundational principles of Wikipedia is [[WP:FIVE|Pillar Five]] and [[WP:IAR]]: rules are simply a tool to help editors improve the encyclopedia. '' +++$+++ * I have highlighted above a paragraph that is particularly important. It is better to try to understand this than whether there are rules for striking comments, and what they might be. One of the foundational principles of Wikipedia is [[WP:FIVE|Pillar Five]] and [[WP:IAR]]: rules are simply a tool to help editors improve the encyclopedia. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 20:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

9357 +++$+++ Nat Krause +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-31 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.220205240E09 +++$+++ Please do not go around accusing other editors of vandalism. Basically all Wikipedia editors know that this is not acceptable. Why don't you?&mdash; +++$+++ Please do not go around accusing other editors of vandalism. Basically all Wikipedia editors know that this is not acceptable. Why don't you?&mdash;[[User:Nat Krause|Nat Krause]]<sup>([[User talk:Nat Krause|Talk!]]·[[Special:Contributions/Nat Krause|What have I done?]])</sup> 10:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
9358 +++$+++ Nat Krause +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9357 +++$+++ 9357 +++$+++ 2008-08-31 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.220230200E09 +++$+++ No, you seem to have misunderstood. If you refer to the page on [[Wikipedia:Vandalism]], you'll find that, \"Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism\" and \"However, significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, or where a non-frivolous explanation for the removal of apparently legitimate content is provided, linked to, or referenced in an edit summary\" and \"Avoid the word \"vandal\". In particular, the word should not be used in reference to any contributor in good standing or to any edits that can arguably be construed as good-faithed. If the edits in question are made in good faith, they are not vandalism.\"&mdash; +++$+++ :No, you seem to have misunderstood. If you refer to the page on [[Wikipedia:Vandalism]], you'll find that, "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism" and "However, significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, or where a non-frivolous explanation for the removal of apparently legitimate content is provided, linked to, or referenced in an edit summary" and "Avoid the word "vandal". In particular, the word should not be used in reference to any contributor in good standing or to any edits that can arguably be construed as good-faithed. If the edits in question are made in good faith, they are not vandalism."&mdash;[[User:Nat Krause|Nat Krause]]<sup>([[User talk:Nat Krause|Talk!]]·[[Special:Contributions/Nat Krause|What have I done?]])</sup> 17:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
9359 +++$+++ Nat Krause +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9357 +++$+++ 9358 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.222550580E09 +++$+++ I don't understand why you continue to refer to my edits as vandalism after you have been advised of Wikipedia policies to the contrary. This behaviour is considered inappropriate on Wikipedia.&mdash; +++$+++ ::I don't understand why you continue to refer to my edits as vandalism after you have been advised of Wikipedia policies to the contrary. This behaviour is considered inappropriate on Wikipedia.&mdash;[[User:Nat Krause|Nat Krause]]<sup>([[User talk:Nat Krause|Talk!]]·[[Special:Contributions/Nat Krause|What have I done?]])</sup> 14:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

533648 +++$+++ Spencer +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533648 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-30 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.233380640E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --''' +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --'''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082567">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T♦</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 21:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
533649 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533648 +++$+++ 533648 +++$+++ 2009-01-31 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.233422340E09 +++$+++ Hi. This article was deleted in the prod process. I suppose the best idea is to restore it and send it through AfD to get a community consensus. This will also give you time to add sources to the article but remember, myspace and facebook don't count. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. This article was deleted in the prod process. I suppose the best idea is to restore it and send it through AfD to get a community consensus. This will also give you time to add sources to the article but remember, myspace and facebook don't count. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

9362 +++$+++ TheLeopard +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9362 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-08 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.223509980E09 +++$+++ Hi!  Please don't break the article into small main sections.  A proper encyclopedia article shouldn't have sections that only consist of one or two sentences.  These two sentences about Qi and Yue, in terms of its content, should be part of the history section, especially after the part where it says the fall of the Xia and the overthrow of Jie; it makes the article thematically more cohesive as well.  Also, if you cite a reference, be sure to review it before presenting it to the article. The source \"State of Yue\" from \"cultural-china.com\" [http:\/\/www.cultural-china.com\/chinaWH\/html\/en\/History1766bye3553.html] which you cited did not mention anything about Minyue and Han Dynasty, so please do not add statement that might be of original research.-- +++$+++ Hi!  Please don't break the article into small main sections.  A proper encyclopedia article shouldn't have sections that only consist of one or two sentences.  These two sentences about Qi and Yue, in terms of its content, should be part of the history section, especially after the part where it says the fall of the Xia and the overthrow of Jie; it makes the article thematically more cohesive as well.  Also, if you cite a reference, be sure to review it before presenting it to the article. The source "State of Yue" from "cultural-china.com" [http://www.cultural-china.com/chinaWH/html/en/History1766bye3553.html] which you cited did not mention anything about Minyue and Han Dynasty, so please do not add statement that might be of original research.--[[User:TheLeopard|TheLeopard]] ([[User talk:TheLeopard|talk]]) 16:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
9363 +++$+++ TheLeopard +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9362 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-09 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.223589000E09 +++$+++ You did not answer a single one of my questions?  I removed part of the statement because the sentence about \"Minyue\" and \"Han Dynasty\" (''After defeat by Chu and Qi in 334 BC the royal family fled and founded the state of Minyue, which was subjugated by the Han dynasty'') wasn't to be found in the \"State of Yue\" source you cited.  If you disagree, please show me where is it on the link [http:\/\/www.cultural-china.com\/chinaWH\/html\/en\/History1766bye3553.html]?  Also, I said that an encyclopedia article should not have short main sections that only has one or two sentences, and the information about Qi and Yue are the kind of information that goes with the history section, so I merged them.  Understand now?-- +++$+++ ::You did not answer a single one of my questions?  I removed part of the statement because the sentence about "Minyue" and "Han Dynasty" (''After defeat by Chu and Qi in 334 BC the royal family fled and founded the state of Minyue, which was subjugated by the Han dynasty'') wasn't to be found in the "State of Yue" source you cited.  If you disagree, please show me where is it on the link [http://www.cultural-china.com/chinaWH/html/en/History1766bye3553.html]?  Also, I said that an encyclopedia article should not have short main sections that only has one or two sentences, and the information about Qi and Yue are the kind of information that goes with the history section, so I merged them.  Understand now?--[[User:TheLeopard|TheLeopard]] ([[User talk:TheLeopard|talk]]) 14:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

533652 +++$+++ Sandstein +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-31 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.233469260E09 +++$+++ Hello. You recently closed this AfD even though the discussion had not yet lasted five days. Current policy (see [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Deletion discussion]]) as well as current consensus (see [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]]) provide that AfD discussions must run for at least five days. Accordingly, I'd like to ask you to please undo your closure and relist the AfD. Thanks, <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Hello. You recently closed this AfD even though the discussion had not yet lasted five days. Current policy (see [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Deletion discussion]]) as well as current consensus (see [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]]) provide that AfD discussions must run for at least five days. Accordingly, I'd like to ask you to please undo your closure and relist the AfD. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 22:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
533653 +++$+++ Sandstein +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533652 +++$+++ 533652 +++$+++ 2009-01-31 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.233469380E09 +++$+++ The same applies to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Kazem HajirAzad]]. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ * The same applies to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazem HajirAzad]]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 22:23, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
533654 +++$+++ Sandstein +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533652 +++$+++ 533652 +++$+++ 2009-01-31 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.233469740E09 +++$+++ And [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Ed, Edd, 'n' Eddy's Big Picture Show]]. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ * And [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed, Edd, 'n' Eddy's Big Picture Show]]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 22:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
533655 +++$+++ Sandstein +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533652 +++$+++ 533652 +++$+++ 2009-01-31 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.233470520E09 +++$+++ And also [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/School punishment]]. I'd appreciate it if you could review all of your premature closures in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Log\/2009 January 25]]. Thanks, <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ * And also [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/School punishment]]. I'd appreciate it if you could review all of your premature closures in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 January 25]]. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 22:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

271510 +++$+++ SusanLesch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-28 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.264737540E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, thank you very much for finding a bad reference in [[Music of Minnesota]]. Two, however, of your taggings are wrong. Please take it easy. Why the sudden interest in this article? - +++$+++ Mattisse, thank you very much for finding a bad reference in [[Music of Minnesota]]. Two, however, of your taggings are wrong. Please take it easy. Why the sudden interest in this article? -[[User:SusanLesch|SusanLesch]] ([[User talk:SusanLesch|talk]]) 19:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
271511 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271510 +++$+++ 271510 +++$+++ 2010-01-28 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.264737900E09 +++$+++ I don't think the tagging was wrong. The information was not in the sources given. Has anyone gone through that article and checked the sources? I did not tag every mistake I saw. I am rather surprised at the low quality of sourcing in the article. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :I don't think the tagging was wrong. The information was not in the sources given. Has anyone gone through that article and checked the sources? I did not tag every mistake I saw. I am rather surprised at the low quality of sourcing in the article. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
271512 +++$+++ SusanLesch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271510 +++$+++ 271511 +++$+++ 2010-01-28 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.264738080E09 +++$+++ The information '''was''' in the sources given both times. Pardon me while I remove myself from the wiki for the afternoon. - +++$+++ ::The information '''was''' in the sources given both times. Pardon me while I remove myself from the wiki for the afternoon. -[[User:SusanLesch|SusanLesch]] ([[User talk:SusanLesch|talk]]) 20:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
271513 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271510 +++$+++ 271512 +++$+++ 2010-01-28 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.264739280E09 +++$+++ Sorry about the two mistakes and I am glad that you removed the faulty source. As I said, I did not mark all the questionable sources; I merely did a spot check. I question whether there has been a good source check of the article. Even if one out of three is wrong, and I am sorry for that, the number is still too high.  Help with source checking should be welcomed. I usually do not make mistakes so I apologize for that.   Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::Sorry about the two mistakes and I am glad that you removed the faulty source. As I said, I did not mark all the questionable sources; I merely did a spot check. I question whether there has been a good source check of the article. Even if one out of three is wrong, and I am sorry for that, the number is still too high.  Help with source checking should be welcomed. I usually do not make mistakes so I apologize for that.   Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

9370 +++$+++ Vegaswikian +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-25 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.237984560E09 +++$+++ As the deletion comment states it lacks notability or the assertion of being notable.  It could also be deleted as spam.  If the company is notable, feel free to recreate it providing some sources that are [[WP:RS|reliable]] and [[WP:V|verifiable]] that show that it meets [[WP:N]].  +++$+++ As the deletion comment states it lacks notability or the assertion of being notable.  It could also be deleted as spam.  If the company is notable, feel free to recreate it providing some sources that are [[WP:RS|reliable]] and [[WP:V|verifiable]] that show that it meets [[WP:N]]. [[User:Vegaswikian|Vegaswikian]] ([[User talk:Vegaswikian|talk]]) 05:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
9371 +++$+++ Vegaswikian +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9370 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.237987320E09 +++$+++ An easier question would be which sections of [[WP:CORP]] does it meet?  I believe the answer to this question is none.  Playing word games is not productive.  You would be better off following the suggestions above to create an article if the case for notability exists.  +++$+++ :::An easier question would be which sections of [[WP:CORP]] does it meet?  I believe the answer to this question is none.  Playing word games is not productive.  You would be better off following the suggestions above to create an article if the case for notability exists. [[User:Vegaswikian|Vegaswikian]] ([[User talk:Vegaswikian|talk]]) 06:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
9372 +++$+++ Vegaswikian +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9370 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.237987800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::: [[User:Vegaswikian|Vegaswikian]] ([[User talk:Vegaswikian|talk]]) 06:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

533659 +++$+++ Anarkeya +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-13 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.234594500E09 +++$+++ The Roelstra page was deleted per WP:PROD, reason was 'Non-notable fictional character;' however, Roelstra is the main antagonist of ''Dragon Prince'', the first book in the ''Dragon Prince'' trilogy by Melanie Rawn. He also greatly influences characters in the following two books as well as in the follwing ''Dragon Star'' trilogy. I request that the page be restored. Thank you.  +++$+++ The Roelstra page was deleted per WP:PROD, reason was 'Non-notable fictional character;' however, Roelstra is the main antagonist of ''Dragon Prince'', the first book in the ''Dragon Prince'' trilogy by Melanie Rawn. He also greatly influences characters in the following two books as well as in the follwing ''Dragon Star'' trilogy. I request that the page be restored. Thank you. [[User:Anarkeya|Anarkeya]] ([[User talk:Anarkeya|talk]]) 22:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
533660 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533659 +++$+++ 533659 +++$+++ 2009-02-14 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.234642020E09 +++$+++ Hi. Ok, I'll restore the article and send it through AfD to gain a broader consensus. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Ok, I'll restore the article and send it through AfD to gain a broader consensus. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

533662 +++$+++ Jalen +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533662 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-15 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.234724880E09 +++$+++ This page has seen continuous vandalism over the past few days. Perhaps you could consider temporary protection. -- +++$+++ This page has seen continuous vandalism over the past few days. Perhaps you could consider temporary protection. --[[User:Jalen|Jalen]] ([[User talk:Jalen|talk]]) 11:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
533663 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533662 +++$+++ 533662 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.234729920E09 +++$+++ Yup, I put on a semi-protection for one week. I think it should do for now. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Yup, I put on a semi-protection for one week. I think it should do for now. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:32, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

9375 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-06 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.246905480E09 +++$+++ Please don't edit war over the inclusion of \"terrorist\" categories. Two editors have already voiced their opinion against including them; if you think the article should be in these categories, leave your rationale at the article's talk page and we can discuss it. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ Please don't edit war over the inclusion of "terrorist" categories. Two editors have already voiced their opinion against including them; if you think the article should be in these categories, leave your rationale at the article's talk page and we can discuss it. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 11:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
9376 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9375 +++$+++ 9375 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.246905780E09 +++$+++ Again, if you think the categories should be included, leave your rationale at '''[[Talk:July 2009 \xdcr\xfcmqi riots|the article's talk page]]''' and I will respond there. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ :Again, if you think the categories should be included, leave your rationale at '''[[Talk:July 2009 Ürümqi riots|the article's talk page]]''' and I will respond there. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 11:43, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

9377 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-06 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.246907160E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:July 2009 Urumqi riots|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:July 2009 Urumqi riots]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:July 2009 Urumqi riots|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:July 2009 Urumqi riots]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 12:06, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
9378 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9377 +++$+++ 9377 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.247227080E09 +++$+++ What part of \"[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots&diff=301315802&oldid=301315370 please discuss]\" do you not understand? This has been removed before by other editors (see, for example, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots&diff=301265037&oldid=301263509][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Pogrom&diff=prev&oldid=301157677]), and you are edit warring. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ :What part of "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots&diff=301315802&oldid=301315370 please discuss]" do you not understand? This has been removed before by other editors (see, for example, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots&diff=301265037&oldid=301263509][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pogrom&diff=prev&oldid=301157677]), and you are edit warring. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 04:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
9379 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9377 +++$+++ 9377 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.247227320E09 +++$+++ '''[[Talk:July_2009_\xdcr\xfcmqi_riots#.22Pogrom.22|Here]]''' is where the discussion is. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ :'''[[Talk:July_2009_Ürümqi_riots#.22Pogrom.22|Here]]''' is where the discussion is. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 05:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
9380 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9377 +++$+++ 9379 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.247349720E09 +++$+++ You've started edit warring again today, with these two reverts [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots&diff=prev&oldid=301526918][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots&diff=prev&oldid=301530817]. I have reported you at the Edit Warring Noticeboard, '''[[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Edit warring#User:Ksyrie reported by User:Rjanag (Result: )|here]]'''. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ ::You've started edit warring again today, with these two reverts [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots&diff=prev&oldid=301526918][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots&diff=prev&oldid=301530817]. I have reported you at the Edit Warring Noticeboard, '''[[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ksyrie reported by User:Rjanag (Result: )|here]]'''. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 15:02, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

271525 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271525 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-01 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.265079480E09 +++$+++ Good. Now please don't react to anything and keep your head down. You've expressed your view on the topic, let others express theirs. Now for my question. Are you deliberately trying to get in trouble? I can't imagine you consider your initial remark anything but aggressive and the remark about 'chuckles' anything but impolite. -- +++$+++ Good. Now please don't react to anything and keep your head down. You've expressed your view on the topic, let others express theirs. Now for my question. Are you deliberately trying to get in trouble? I can't imagine you consider your initial remark anything but aggressive and the remark about 'chuckles' anything but impolite. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 18:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271526 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271525 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.265079600E09 +++$+++ And, BTW, just to be on the safe side, I'm going to ban you from the WT:FAC page for 48 hours. Sorry, but gotta be done because you have the tendency to go off! -- +++$+++ :::: And, BTW, just to be on the safe side, I'm going to ban you from the WT:FAC page for 48 hours. Sorry, but gotta be done because you have the tendency to go off! --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 19:00, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271527 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271525 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.265080620E09 +++$+++ That's fine. I had no intention of posting there more on this subject anyway.  I was just a little shocked that not only was [[Wife selling]] suggested as an April Fools joke, but also [[Traumatic insemination]]. Thank you for your fine help.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::That's fine. I had no intention of posting there more on this subject anyway.  I was just a little shocked that not only was [[Wife selling]] suggested as an April Fools joke, but also [[Traumatic insemination]]. Thank you for your fine help.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271528 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271525 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.265080980E09 +++$+++ Different people find different things funny. Generally, if you find something shocking, or it makes you angry, follow Philcha's excellent advice and go read a book for a couple of hours. - +++$+++ ::::::Different people find different things funny. Generally, if you find something shocking, or it makes you angry, follow Philcha's excellent advice and go read a book for a couple of hours. -[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 19:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

9382 +++$+++ William M. Connolley +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9382 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-13 08:35:00 +++$+++ 1.247499300E09 +++$+++ Well, I warned you. I've blocked you for 24h  +++$+++ Well, I warned you. I've blocked you for 24h [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] ([[User talk:William M. Connolley|talk]]) 08:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
9383 +++$+++ Ohconfucius +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9382 +++$+++ 9382 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.247505840E09 +++$+++ I see that there has only been a low level of activity since the last time this editor has been warned. <s>I can only presume this block is related to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots&diff=prev&oldid=301820357 the revert] Ksyrie made to my edit of today.<\/s> Ksyrie introduced new text; it was changed by me and was reverted by Ksyrie. As far as this content is concerned, and although there was no discussion on Ksyrie's part, I don't consider there to have been any disruption or warring - just a normal part of the [[WP:BRD]] cycle. <s>I would therefore appeal this block.<\/s>  +++$+++ *I see that there has only been a low level of activity since the last time this editor has been warned. <s>I can only presume this block is related to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots&diff=prev&oldid=301820357 the revert] Ksyrie made to my edit of today.</s> Ksyrie introduced new text; it was changed by me and was reverted by Ksyrie. As far as this content is concerned, and although there was no discussion on Ksyrie's part, I don't consider there to have been any disruption or warring - just a normal part of the [[WP:BRD]] cycle. <s>I would therefore appeal this block.</s> [[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius|talk]]) 10:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
9384 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9382 +++$+++ 9383 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.247508900E09 +++$+++ Nope, Ksyrie also re-added his pogrom mumbo jumbo this morning ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots&diff=prev&oldid=301816560 diff]), so the block was well-warranted. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ **Nope, Ksyrie also re-added his pogrom mumbo jumbo this morning ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots&diff=prev&oldid=301816560 diff]), so the block was well-warranted. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 11:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
9385 +++$+++ Ohconfucius +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9382 +++$+++ 9384 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.247515560E09 +++$+++ Oh, I missed that. As it was for that stupid [[:Category:Pogroms]] nonsense, I cannot stick up for Ksyrie.  +++$+++ ***Oh, I missed that. As it was for that stupid [[:Category:Pogroms]] nonsense, I cannot stick up for Ksyrie. [[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius|talk]]) 13:06, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

533672 +++$+++ Dream Focus  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-25 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.235623620E09 +++$+++ It says to notify you.  Please discuss it there.  +++$+++ It says to notify you.  Please discuss it there. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>]]''' 20:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
533673 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533672 +++$+++ 533672 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.235869860E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article (in my and nominator's opinion) met the G11 criteria for deletion, ''Pages that exclusively promote some entity and that would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic.'' So it's not just to get money or membership, just promoting is not ok. I believe the article can be written on the topic but in another way, this one had lots of problems - weird formatting, strong statements without references (''the most open and democratical political party in Turkey''), also, I find it hard to see whether the notability has been clearly established. Is it a party, a platform or something else? How many members, run for any election etc...?  Also, there are no real references, apart from the official website and this does not count. References should be third-party. I hope this helps... I can restore the article in your userspace for a while, is this ok with you? Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article (in my and nominator's opinion) met the G11 criteria for deletion, ''Pages that exclusively promote some entity and that would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic.'' So it's not just to get money or membership, just promoting is not ok. I believe the article can be written on the topic but in another way, this one had lots of problems - weird formatting, strong statements without references (''the most open and democratical political party in Turkey''), also, I find it hard to see whether the notability has been clearly established. Is it a party, a platform or something else? How many members, run for any election etc...?  Also, there are no real references, apart from the official website and this does not count. References should be third-party. I hope this helps... I can restore the article in your userspace for a while, is this ok with you? Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:11, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
533674 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533672 +++$+++ 533672 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.235873040E09 +++$+++ Restored on your talkpage. Good luck with rewriting. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Restored on your talkpage. Good luck with rewriting. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
533675 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533672 +++$+++ 533672 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.235968080E09 +++$+++ Afd, as you can see. And there is another one, hopefully you'll get some useful comments there. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Afd, as you can see. And there is another one, hopefully you'll get some useful comments there. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

271529 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271529 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-01 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.265088300E09 +++$+++ The recent incident appears to be another example of [[WP:OWN|article ownership]]. It seems that if an opinion is given on whether or not one thinks an article is appropriate for TFA, the article's editor takes personal umbrage: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates&diff=341321414&oldid=341318805   bugger all to do with a \"spirit of cooperation\"] ??  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ The recent incident appears to be another example of [[WP:OWN|article ownership]]. It seems that if an opinion is given on whether or not one thinks an article is appropriate for TFA, the article's editor takes personal umbrage: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates&diff=341321414&oldid=341318805   bugger all to do with a "spirit of cooperation"] ??  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:25, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271530 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271529 +++$+++ 271529 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.265089020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ : [[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] has given you excellent advice and support in this matter. I have nothing to add at the moment. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 21:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271531 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271529 +++$+++ 271530 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.265089440E09 +++$+++ [[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] did not opine on the above comment, as that comment was made in response to the wording I added at the suggestion of RegentsPark. OK. I will ask him. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] did not opine on the above comment, as that comment was made in response to the wording I added at the suggestion of RegentsPark. OK. I will ask him. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271532 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271529 +++$+++ 271531 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.265089980E09 +++$+++ You just can't let things go, can you; now you're accusing me of article ownership. Your opening remarks [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates&diff=prev&oldid=341200970 \"It would be a way of beefing up it's low page view statistics and maybe even get it linked to other articles at Wikipedia so that it contributes to the general encyclopedia]\" were quite clearly intended to be inflammatory. Nothing to do with the appropriateness or otherwise of the article at TFA, which I note no other editor has objected to. -- +++$+++ :::You just can't let things go, can you; now you're accusing me of article ownership. Your opening remarks [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates&diff=prev&oldid=341200970 "It would be a way of beefing up it's low page view statistics and maybe even get it linked to other articles at Wikipedia so that it contributes to the general encyclopedia]" were quite clearly intended to be inflammatory. Nothing to do with the appropriateness or otherwise of the article at TFA, which I note no other editor has objected to. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 21:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271533 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271529 +++$+++ 271532 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.265090280E09 +++$+++ I said nothing about you and did not know it was your article. Please do not take comments made about articles personally.  It makes it seem like [[WP:OWN|you own the article]].  \u2014 +++$+++ ::::I said nothing about you and did not know it was your article. Please do not take comments made about articles personally.  It makes it seem like [[WP:OWN|you own the article]].  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271534 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271529 +++$+++ 271533 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.265090580E09 +++$+++ {{edit conflict}} You still don't get it. It's not \"my article\". I would have responded in the same way whichever article you'd adopted the same beligerent and insulting stance against, no matter who you believed the owner to be. As it happens I'd support Scratching Fanny for the 1 April TFA, and I had very little to do with that. -- +++$+++ :::::{{edit conflict}} You still don't get it. It's not "my article". I would have responded in the same way whichever article you'd adopted the same beligerent and insulting stance against, no matter who you believed the owner to be. As it happens I'd support Scratching Fanny for the 1 April TFA, and I had very little to do with that. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 22:03, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

569543 +++$+++ KMSatoh202 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569543 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-07 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.168158840E09 +++$+++ The article was deleted again before I even had the chance to add any information. Not that it matters anyway, since apparently for a band's release to be notable it has to have some chart position. Is this the case? I hope not, because I always thought that Wikipedia was a gold mine for information that was hard to find, but these \"regulations\" for articles on releases seems to make it difficult for a legitimate release to get a page without chart info and sales statistics. I guess I can understand some of the motives behind this, but while this can keep Wikipedia free from true non-notables, it also hurts bands and releases that deserve recognition. Anyway, does this mean that I have to wait for this four year old 7\" to hit it big before an article can be created? +++$+++ The article was deleted again before I even had the chance to add any information. Not that it matters anyway, since apparently for a band's release to be notable it has to have some chart position. Is this the case? I hope not, because I always thought that Wikipedia was a gold mine for information that was hard to find, but these "regulations" for articles on releases seems to make it difficult for a legitimate release to get a page without chart info and sales statistics. I guess I can understand some of the motives behind this, but while this can keep Wikipedia free from true non-notables, it also hurts bands and releases that deserve recognition. Anyway, does this mean that I have to wait for this four year old 7" to hit it big before an article can be created?[[User:KMSatoh202|KMSatoh202]] 00:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
569544 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569543 +++$+++ 569543 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.168159140E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia isn't the place to advertise future success, it is a record of notable, people, groups, places, processes, objects, achievements, etc. Standards for music-related notability are available at [[:WP:Music]].  Music and band-related articles will be reviewed according to these standards and kept or deleted as required.  Waiting isn't an issue - if a single isn't notable then an article about it cannot assert any notability; non-notable articles are deleted with reference to the policies and guidelines.  +++$+++ :Wikipedia isn't the place to advertise future success, it is a record of notable, people, groups, places, processes, objects, achievements, etc. Standards for music-related notability are available at [[:WP:Music]].  Music and band-related articles will be reviewed according to these standards and kept or deleted as required.  Waiting isn't an issue - if a single isn't notable then an article about it cannot assert any notability; non-notable articles are deleted with reference to the policies and guidelines. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 00:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

533676 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-01 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.235962740E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your support at such a difficult time. I will keep that in mind. But such accusations are very difficult to recover from... and only lead to me questioning how I can possibly rephrase words that seem to have very few synonyms without straying into original research territory. Unfortunately, I am getting great grief over a few sentences. The hassle to be taken from a number of paragraphs then hardly seems worth the bother... --<span style=\"color:red\">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]<\/span> <sub>  +++$+++ Thank you for your support at such a difficult time. I will keep that in mind. But such accusations are very difficult to recover from... and only lead to me questioning how I can possibly rephrase words that seem to have very few synonyms without straying into original research territory. Unfortunately, I am getting great grief over a few sentences. The hassle to be taken from a number of paragraphs then hardly seems worth the bother... --<span style="color:red">[[User: Candlewicke|Candlewicke]]</span> <sub> [[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<big><u>S</u></big>]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Candlewicke|<big><u>T</u></big>]] </sup><sub>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:# :);color:green;"></span>|<span style="color:green;"># :)</span>}} </sub> 18:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
533677 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533676 +++$+++ 533676 +++$+++ 2009-03-04 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.236231660E09 +++$+++ Hi. I have some issues with the article in its present state. First, no notability asserted, which is one of the things each article has to fulfill. Second, as you noticed, no references from external sources. So, an article listing just the features can easily be seen as an advert. The fact that other similar pages exist does not help, either they should be deleted as well or they comply with the guidelines. However, what I can do is to restore the article and send it through AfD debate, this would give you around 5 days to add the references and address other concerns that may be risen. I think this is the best to do here, fine with you? Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I have some issues with the article in its present state. First, no notability asserted, which is one of the things each article has to fulfill. Second, as you noticed, no references from external sources. So, an article listing just the features can easily be seen as an advert. The fact that other similar pages exist does not help, either they should be deleted as well or they comply with the guidelines. However, what I can do is to restore the article and send it through AfD debate, this would give you around 5 days to add the references and address other concerns that may be risen. I think this is the best to do here, fine with you? Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
533678 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533676 +++$+++ 533676 +++$+++ 2009-03-05 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.236270720E09 +++$+++ Done. Good luck with improvements. --''' +++$+++ : Done. Good luck with improvements. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

9389 +++$+++ Ahunt +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-15 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.263548940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for finding that item, but the ref doesn't support the text you have added. It does say they are working on a Windows version of the hardware but that doesn't support that the 1.5M installs will be Linux by any stretch. The article doesn't say Linux anywhere there. Do you have a better ref for this that supports the text? -  +++$+++ Thanks for finding that item, but the ref doesn't support the text you have added. It does say they are working on a Windows version of the hardware but that doesn't support that the 1.5M installs will be Linux by any stretch. The article doesn't say Linux anywhere there. Do you have a better ref for this that supports the text? - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 01:49, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
9390 +++$+++ Ahunt +++$+++ Ksyrie +++$+++ 9389 +++$+++ 9389 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.263549240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for finding that ref - that helps a lot! -  +++$+++ :Thanks for finding that ref - that helps a lot! - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 01:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

541513 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541513 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-30 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.175278920E09 +++$+++ Can you be more specific about what exactly you think establishes the notability of this blog in your comment? It would make your opinion a lot stronger since now it's just two votes of people who make opposite assertions with nothing to back it up. -  +++$+++ Can you be more specific about what exactly you think establishes the notability of this blog in your comment? It would make your opinion a lot stronger since now it's just two votes of people who make opposite assertions with nothing to back it up. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 11:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
541514 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541513 +++$+++ 541513 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.175441640E09 +++$+++ Bryson says notability is not asserted, you say it is. Without any sort of additional statements, I can't make an informed decision. It doesn't look all that notable to me, but I admit I know nothing about the subject at all, so if you shared your train of thought that would help me a lot. -  +++$+++ *Bryson says notability is not asserted, you say it is. Without any sort of additional statements, I can't make an informed decision. It doesn't look all that notable to me, but I admit I know nothing about the subject at all, so if you shared your train of thought that would help me a lot. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 08:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

271535 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271535 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-01 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.265090340E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I saw the comment earlier. That's what I mean by \"don't react to anything and keep your head down\". I expected that you'll get some flak after your last post (that's why I banned you from that talk page) and suggest you ignore that flak completely. Even on your own talk page. Starting now. -- +++$+++ Mattisse, I saw the comment earlier. That's what I mean by "don't react to anything and keep your head down". I expected that you'll get some flak after your last post (that's why I banned you from that talk page) and suggest you ignore that flak completely. Even on your own talk page. Starting now. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 21:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271536 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271535 +++$+++ 271535 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.265090640E09 +++$+++ Wow! Yes. I see what you mean. OK. Thanks! Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ :Wow! Yes. I see what you mean. OK. Thanks! Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

271537 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-01 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.265020380E09 +++$+++ This will date me, but I'd never heard of the lady before I got involved with Alejandro! :) -- +++$+++ This will date me, but I'd never heard of the lady before I got involved with Alejandro! :) --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 02:33, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271538 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.265020680E09 +++$+++ I never had either, until I came across [[Lady Gaga]] in the [[WP:GAN|GAN]] nominations . But I have learned that events move fast. The world is changing.  There is a new generation, and they will be important to Wikipedia! Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :I never had either, until I came across [[Lady Gaga]] in the [[WP:GAN|GAN]] nominations . But I have learned that events move fast. The world is changing.  There is a new generation, and they will be important to Wikipedia! Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271539 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 271538 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.265095560E09 +++$+++ To bring you up to speed: [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=qrO4YZeyl0I] ;) '''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ ::To bring you up to speed: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrO4YZeyl0I] ;) '''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|JN]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 23:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271540 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 271539 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.265096580E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much! I watched the [[Grammies]] and saw her last night. She is quite refreshing. (Do you  know why for some reason the flash player reloads every few seconds, making it impossible to watch it without interruption?  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::Thank you very much! I watched the [[Grammies]] and saw her last night. She is quite refreshing. (Do you  know why for some reason the flash player reloads every few seconds, making it impossible to watch it without interruption?  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:43, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
271541 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 271540 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.265100720E09 +++$+++ Glad you liked it. We are listening to it quite a lot at home. :) The problem you have is probably due to the player buffering; if you have a slow connection, the transmission can't keep up with the real-time song. If that is the problem, then the trick is simply to click on Pause and wait until most of the song is downloaded (watch the little red bar grow from left to right), and then to click Play when the red bar is complete. --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ ::::Glad you liked it. We are listening to it quite a lot at home. :) The problem you have is probably due to the player buffering; if you have a slow connection, the transmission can't keep up with the real-time song. If that is the problem, then the trick is simply to click on Pause and wait until most of the song is downloaded (watch the little red bar grow from left to right), and then to click Play when the red bar is complete. --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|JN]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 00:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
271542 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 271541 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.265101020E09 +++$+++ Supposedly I have a very fast connection. I guess I will have to make a telephone call and inquire what is going on.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::Supposedly I have a very fast connection. I guess I will have to make a telephone call and inquire what is going on.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
271543 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 271542 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.265101140E09 +++$+++ Do you have the problem on all youtube videos or just on some? --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ ::::::Do you have the problem on all youtube videos or just on some? --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|JN]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 00:59, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
271544 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 271543 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.265101320E09 +++$+++ More so on that one. Although I tried a few familiar ones, and there was a slight buffering problem. I am on the phone to technical support at the moment! Thanks, \u2014 +++$+++ :::::::More so on that one. Although I tried a few familiar ones, and there was a slight buffering problem. I am on the phone to technical support at the moment! Thanks, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:02, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
271545 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 271544 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.265101860E09 +++$+++ As it happens, that song is fine here, but we do sometimes get the problem on other videos as well, to an equally annoying degree. I reckon that the transmission is only ever as fast as the slowest link in the chain. The slowest link may be a link somewhere down the line, on the other side of the globe, rather than your or my broadband connection. That would explain why some videos are fine to play in real time, and others first need to be buffered before they will play right. Good luck with the Tech Support guys, if they have any great wisdom to share, do pass it on! --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ ::::::::As it happens, that song is fine here, but we do sometimes get the problem on other videos as well, to an equally annoying degree. I reckon that the transmission is only ever as fast as the slowest link in the chain. The slowest link may be a link somewhere down the line, on the other side of the globe, rather than your or my broadband connection. That would explain why some videos are fine to play in real time, and others first need to be buffered before they will play right. Good luck with the Tech Support guys, if they have any great wisdom to share, do pass it on! --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|JN]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 01:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
271546 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 271545 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.265104140E09 +++$+++ Well, technical support, Frances in Manila, proved to me that my download speed of 26,300 was normal. Frances tried to help me clear my cache and other such things with this Windows 7. Nothing seems to help Lady Gaga so I let Frances off the hook and said I would work it out myself. Hope this isn't going to plague me.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::::::Well, technical support, Frances in Manila, proved to me that my download speed of 26,300 was normal. Frances tried to help me clear my cache and other such things with this Windows 7. Nothing seems to help Lady Gaga so I let Frances off the hook and said I would work it out myself. Hope this isn't going to plague me.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
271547 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 271546 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.265195820E09 +++$+++ Technical support is always fun. :) When I have the buffering problem, I press Pause, spend 5 minutes doing something else, and when I come back to it afterwards, my browser has downloaded the video and plays it fine. I don't think this is a problem that can be solved, you can only work around it. The difference between you and me may just be your geographical location relative to the computer that actually hosts that specific video. --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ ::::::::::Technical support is always fun. :) When I have the buffering problem, I press Pause, spend 5 minutes doing something else, and when I come back to it afterwards, my browser has downloaded the video and plays it fine. I don't think this is a problem that can be solved, you can only work around it. The difference between you and me may just be your geographical location relative to the computer that actually hosts that specific video. --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|JN]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 03:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
271548 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 271547 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.265254560E09 +++$+++ You were right. Today it works fine!    \u2014 +++$+++ :::::::::::You were right. Today it works fine!    —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
271549 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271537 +++$+++ 271548 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.265256120E09 +++$+++ Good! :) --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ ::::::::::::Good! :) --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|JN]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 20:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

506597 +++$+++ Gabriele449 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-03 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.299217260E09 +++$+++ How can you request for an account to be deleted?  +++$+++ How can you request for an account to be deleted? [[User:Gabriele449|<font color="red">'''Gabesta449'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Gabriele449|<font color="blue"><sup>edits</sup></font>]] <sup>♦</sup> [[User talk:Gabriele449|<font color="gold"><sup>chat</sup></font>]] 21:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
506598 +++$+++ Gabriele449 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506597 +++$+++ 506597 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.299217380E09 +++$+++ Please post on my talk page, Thanks.  +++$+++ :Please post on my talk page, Thanks. [[User:Gabriele449|<font color="red">'''Gabesta449'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Gabriele449|<font color="blue"><sup>edits</sup></font>]] <sup>♦</sup> [[User talk:Gabriele449|<font color="gold"><sup>chat</sup></font>]] 21:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

533686 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-07 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.236463860E09 +++$+++ Hi, Tone. A user previously tried to Speedy and Prod this article on a pair of well-known Japanese celebrities. This article currently has an AfD tag on it. So far, so good-- I expected that outcome and was preparing evidence for it. However, when I go to that AfD, it mysteriously seems to have been Speedy-closed before anyone with any interest or knowledge of the subject could have had any input. You are listed as the speedy closer. Is there a reason the closing of this article was so urgent it could not have waited for a proper AfD discussion?  +++$+++ Hi, Tone. A user previously tried to Speedy and Prod this article on a pair of well-known Japanese celebrities. This article currently has an AfD tag on it. So far, so good-- I expected that outcome and was preparing evidence for it. However, when I go to that AfD, it mysteriously seems to have been Speedy-closed before anyone with any interest or knowledge of the subject could have had any input. You are listed as the speedy closer. Is there a reason the closing of this article was so urgent it could not have waited for a proper AfD discussion? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 14:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
533687 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533686 +++$+++ 533686 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.236464040E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was speedied under A7 criteria. If you can provide the sources, I can postpone the deletion. By the way, tha article deleted had wrong capitalisation, the one in the link is still there. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was speedied under A7 criteria. If you can provide the sources, I can postpone the deletion. By the way, tha article deleted had wrong capitalisation, the one in the link is still there. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
533688 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533686 +++$+++ 533687 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.236464880E09 +++$+++ Right-- I was wondering if the capitalization had something to do with it... Is the Speedy just for the mis-capitalized version? Because the AfD at the correctly-capitalized one still goes to the Speedy... Either way, I've never known an article on a verifiable celebrity to be Speedyable under A7 criteria, and expected to have time to put a case together. The deletion of an article on a verifiable celebrity with multiple starring appearances, and a hit song would at least merit a discussion, I thought. I've also notified another editor with knowledge in this area. I won't be able to work on it today, but last night I made a start with [[User:Dekkappai\/Temp2|THIS]] list of their rankings in the past two years at one of the largest AV retailers in Japan. They finish in the top 50 both years, have two in the top 50 for several months, and are in second place for two months. Not conclusive, I know, but then I was just starting out & thought there was enough evidence to fend off a Speedy already-- from the little info in the article, combined with the extensive list of works at the [http:\/\/ja.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%E3%81%82%E3%81%84%E3%82%8A%26%E3%82%81%E3%81%84%E3%82%8A Ja-wiki article].  +++$+++ ::Right-- I was wondering if the capitalization had something to do with it... Is the Speedy just for the mis-capitalized version? Because the AfD at the correctly-capitalized one still goes to the Speedy... Either way, I've never known an article on a verifiable celebrity to be Speedyable under A7 criteria, and expected to have time to put a case together. The deletion of an article on a verifiable celebrity with multiple starring appearances, and a hit song would at least merit a discussion, I thought. I've also notified another editor with knowledge in this area. I won't be able to work on it today, but last night I made a start with [[User:Dekkappai/Temp2|THIS]] list of their rankings in the past two years at one of the largest AV retailers in Japan. They finish in the top 50 both years, have two in the top 50 for several months, and are in second place for two months. Not conclusive, I know, but then I was just starting out & thought there was enough evidence to fend off a Speedy already-- from the little info in the article, combined with the extensive list of works at the [http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%81%82%E3%81%84%E3%82%8A%26%E3%82%81%E3%81%84%E3%82%8A Ja-wiki article]. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 14:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
533689 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533686 +++$+++ 533688 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.236465120E09 +++$+++ Well, now AfD is back and fixed and it should stay there for 5 days. So you have plenty of time to fix the article. Just more content and the case is easy. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ ::: Well, now AfD is back and fixed and it should stay there for 5 days. So you have plenty of time to fix the article. Just more content and the case is easy. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
533690 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533686 +++$+++ 533689 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.236465360E09 +++$+++ Many thanks. Yes, I intend to work on the article before casting a !vote. Regards.  +++$+++ :::: Many thanks. Yes, I intend to work on the article before casting a !vote. Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] ([[User talk:Dekkappai|talk]]) 14:36, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

88948 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88948 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-15 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.205566920E09 +++$+++ I have nominated [[Stephanie Quinn]], an article you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Stephanie Quinn]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ''' +++$+++ I have nominated [[Stephanie Quinn]], an article you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Quinn]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> '''[[User:Rodhullandemu|<font color="7F007F">'''Rodhullandemu'''</font>]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|Talk]]) 00:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
88949 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88948 +++$+++ 88948 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.205739420E09 +++$+++ Sorry about the confusion, I misunderstood what another editor was asking for, but it is all sorted out now. The above was an automated message resulting from this and it is safe to ignore it. --''' +++$+++ :Sorry about the confusion, I misunderstood what another editor was asking for, but it is all sorted out now. The above was an automated message resulting from this and it is safe to ignore it. --'''[[User:Rodhullandemu|<font color="7F007F">'''Rodhullandemu'''</font>]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|Talk]]) 00:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

533691 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533691 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-08 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.236566040E09 +++$+++ Hi there! It's a bit sad that you speedied the AfD at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Akoustic Odyssey]] since we currently discuss it at [[WP:ANI]] and still could need the diffs. --<small>''Avant-garde a clue''<\/small>-'''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ Hi there! It's a bit sad that you speedied the AfD at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akoustic Odyssey]] since we currently discuss it at [[WP:ANI]] and still could need the diffs. --<small>''Avant-garde a clue''</small>-'''<font color="#000000">[[User:HexaChord|hexa]]</font><font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:HexaChord|Chord]]</font><sup><font color="#FFFF00">[[WP:BH|2]]</font></sup>''' 19:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
533692 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533691 +++$+++ 533691 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.236570420E09 +++$+++ Hi. Hm, what to do... If you want, I can restore it and userfy it to someone space so that the diffs can be provided? Actually, any admin can do that if you need it right now. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Hm, what to do... If you want, I can restore it and userfy it to someone space so that the diffs can be provided? Actually, any admin can do that if you need it right now. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
533693 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533691 +++$+++ 533692 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.236570600E09 +++$+++ Yes, userfy it please. --<small>''Avant-garde a clue''<\/small>-'''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ ::Yes, userfy it please. --<small>''Avant-garde a clue''</small>-'''<font color="#000000">[[User:HexaChord|hexa]]</font><font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:HexaChord|Chord]]</font><sup><font color="#FFFF00">[[WP:BH|2]]</font></sup>''' 20:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
533694 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533691 +++$+++ 533693 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.236571080E09 +++$+++ Where to? Could you suggest a place? --''' +++$+++ ::: Where to? Could you suggest a place? --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:58, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
533695 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533691 +++$+++ 533694 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.236571320E09 +++$+++ As I know the creator, put it in his space as \"\/Akoustic Odyssey\", he won't kill me for that. ;-) --<small>''Avant-garde a clue''<\/small>-'''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::: As I know the creator, put it in his space as "/Akoustic Odyssey", he won't kill me for that. ;-) --<small>''Avant-garde a clue''</small>-'''<font color="#000000">[[User:HexaChord|hexa]]</font><font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:HexaChord|Chord]]</font><sup><font color="#FFFF00">[[WP:BH|2]]</font></sup>''' 21:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
533696 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533691 +++$+++ 533692 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.236571560E09 +++$+++ Done, see [[User:Ilovebucketheadz\/Akoustic Odyssey]]. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ :: Done, see [[User:Ilovebucketheadz/Akoustic Odyssey]]. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
533697 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533691 +++$+++ 533696 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.236571740E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much. --<small>''Avant-garde a clue''<\/small>-'''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::Thank you very much. --<small>''Avant-garde a clue''</small>-'''<font color="#000000">[[User:HexaChord|hexa]]</font><font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:HexaChord|Chord]]</font><sup><font color="#FFFF00">[[WP:BH|2]]</font></sup>''' 21:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

307402 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 307402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-18 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.292733300E09 +++$+++ Hello Crossmr. Just had to drop a note regarding this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=402771201] edit. Thanks for making me laugh out loud on a chilly (where I am) day. Cheers of the holiday season to you.  +++$+++ Hello Crossmr. Just had to drop a note regarding this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=402771201] edit. Thanks for making me laugh out loud on a chilly (where I am) day. Cheers of the holiday season to you. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 20:35, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
307403 +++$+++ Athaenara +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ 307402 +++$+++ 307402 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.293300480E09 +++$+++ It reached me, too, and I had to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Athaenara&diff=prev&oldid=404155413 enshrine it].  \u2013  +++$+++ : It reached me, too, and I had to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Athaenara&diff=prev&oldid=404155413 enshrine it].  – [[User:Athaenara|Athaenara]] [[User talk:Athaenara| ✉ ]] 10:08, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

271550 +++$+++ Fainites +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-03 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.265261760E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. The first four \"not in citation\" tags you added [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Alzheimer%27s_disease#Pharmaceutical here] today on the [[Alzheimer's disease]] article in the pharmacueticals section do not appear to be correct. Each drug appears in the citation given and if you go to each drug and click on \"brand name\" it gives you the brand names as cited. (The fifth one, Memantine, does now only cite one of the brand names.) Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. The first four "not in citation" tags you added [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alzheimer%27s_disease#Pharmaceutical here] today on the [[Alzheimer's disease]] article in the pharmacueticals section do not appear to be correct. Each drug appears in the citation given and if you go to each drug and click on "brand name" it gives you the brand names as cited. (The fifth one, Memantine, does now only cite one of the brand names.) Thanks. [[User:Fainites|Fainites]] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Fainites|barley]]</small></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Fainites|<small>scribs</small>]] 21:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
271551 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271550 +++$+++ 271550 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.265262180E09 +++$+++ I think the footnote should give those instructions. However, I will remove those four.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :I think the footnote should give those instructions. However, I will remove those four.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
271552 +++$+++ Fainites +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271550 +++$+++ 271551 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.265262420E09 +++$+++ OK. Thanks. I mentioned it to Garrondo too in case I was missing something and also becase he may know what's going on with the fifth brand name.  +++$+++ ::OK. Thanks. I mentioned it to Garrondo too in case I was missing something and also becase he may know what's going on with the fifth brand name. [[User:Fainites|Fainites]] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Fainites|barley]]</small></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Fainites|<small>scribs</small>]] 21:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
271553 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271550 +++$+++ 271552 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.265263020E09 +++$+++ Could  not the links be fixed to go  to the correct link for a given drug? The link checker calls them dead links, and since they have different urls, I presume they originally went to the correct pages.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::Could  not the links be fixed to go  to the correct link for a given drug? The link checker calls them dead links, and since they have different urls, I presume they originally went to the correct pages.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
271554 +++$+++ Fainites +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271550 +++$+++ 271553 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.265263380E09 +++$+++ It's worth a try. +++$+++ ::::It's worth a try.[[User:Fainites|Fainites]] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Fainites|barley]]</small></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Fainites|<small>scribs</small>]] 22:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
271555 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271550 +++$+++ 271554 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.265263920E09 +++$+++ I don't know who designed or maintains the link checker; checking the articlehistory should reveal that.  Glad this is partially settled!   +++$+++ ::::: I don't know who designed or maintains the link checker; checking the articlehistory should reveal that.  Glad this is partially settled!  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:12, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
271556 +++$+++ Fainites +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271550 +++$+++ 271554 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.265264400E09 +++$+++ I've changed the urls. They seem to work.  +++$+++ :::::I've changed the urls. They seem to work. [[User:Fainites|Fainites]] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Fainites|barley]]</small></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Fainites|<small>scribs</small>]] 22:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
271557 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271550 +++$+++ 271556 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.265267460E09 +++$+++ Fixed is better. That made the link checker tool happy.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::::::Fixed is better. That made the link checker tool happy.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:11, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

533698 +++$+++ Cool3 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533698 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-09 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.236600240E09 +++$+++ I'm currently looking for an admin coach, and I noticed on the status page for coaches that you appear to have an open slot.  So, I was wondering, would you be willing to take me on?  I've been around for a while, and I was most active in 2006, culminating in [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Cool3 2| An unsuccessful RfA]].  After that, I went through some stop and start editing for a while, before taking what became a 2 year wikibreak.  Now I'm back, and I'm interested in becoming an admin this time around.  I have just about 3400 edits at the moment, I'm active in anti-vandal work, i've participated in a few hundred RfAs, written several DYKs, a Featured Article: [[Michael Woodruff]], and I have another article [[Operation Deny Flight]] in FAC as we speak.  Anyway, would you be interested in coaching me?  +++$+++ I'm currently looking for an admin coach, and I noticed on the status page for coaches that you appear to have an open slot.  So, I was wondering, would you be willing to take me on?  I've been around for a while, and I was most active in 2006, culminating in [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cool3 2| An unsuccessful RfA]].  After that, I went through some stop and start editing for a while, before taking what became a 2 year wikibreak.  Now I'm back, and I'm interested in becoming an admin this time around.  I have just about 3400 edits at the moment, I'm active in anti-vandal work, i've participated in a few hundred RfAs, written several DYKs, a Featured Article: [[Michael Woodruff]], and I have another article [[Operation Deny Flight]] in FAC as we speak.  Anyway, would you be interested in coaching me? [[User:Cool3|Cool3]] ([[User talk:Cool3|talk]]) 05:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
533699 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533698 +++$+++ 533698 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.236692580E09 +++$+++ Hi. The thing is that I don't have time for full coaching (a bit busy these days) but I'll be happy to help if there are any questions from your side. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The thing is that I don't have time for full coaching (a bit busy these days) but I'll be happy to help if there are any questions from your side. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 06:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
533700 +++$+++ Cool3 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533698 +++$+++ 533699 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.236729780E09 +++$+++ Thanks, sorry to hear you're too busy.  +++$+++ ::Thanks, sorry to hear you're too busy. [[User:Cool3|Cool3]] ([[User talk:Cool3|talk]]) 17:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

602617 +++$+++ GargoyleMT +++$+++ Lord Hawk +++$+++ 602617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-01 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.178069520E09 +++$+++ I noticed you re-added Blue Dragon to the Xbox 360 games category.  This is over-categorization, as Blue Dragon is in the 360 exclusives category, which is a subcategory of 360 games.  I don't see a reason for it to be in both the parent and child categories.  Is there something else at work here?  -- +++$+++ I noticed you re-added Blue Dragon to the Xbox 360 games category.  This is over-categorization, as Blue Dragon is in the 360 exclusives category, which is a subcategory of 360 games.  I don't see a reason for it to be in both the parent and child categories.  Is there something else at work here?  --[[User:GargoyleMT|GargoyleMT]] 18:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
602618 +++$+++  +++$+++ Lord Hawk +++$+++ 602617 +++$+++ 602617 +++$+++ 2007-05-01 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.178080920E09 +++$+++ If you put the game on just the Xbox 360-only list, it does not get on the Xbox 360 list.  +++$+++ :If you put the game on just the Xbox 360-only list, it does not get on the Xbox 360 list. [[User:Lord Hawk]] 21:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
602619 +++$+++ GargoyleMT +++$+++ Lord Hawk +++$+++ 602617 +++$+++ 602618 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.178147280E09 +++$+++ What you said <s>on my talk page<\/s> is true, it does not appear in [[:Category:Xbox 360 games]] if you put it in [[:Category:Xbox 360-only games]].  However, users can find the 360-only games category in the 360 games category, and thus people can find the game that way.  This appears to be the convention among exclusive games and pages in general (I believe the categorizing guideline says to put pages in the most specific category (in the section talking about overcategorizing, I believe)).  (I'm watching this page, so feel free to respond here.)-- +++$+++ ::What you said <s>on my talk page</s> is true, it does not appear in [[:Category:Xbox 360 games]] if you put it in [[:Category:Xbox 360-only games]].  However, users can find the 360-only games category in the 360 games category, and thus people can find the game that way.  This appears to be the convention among exclusive games and pages in general (I believe the categorizing guideline says to put pages in the most specific category (in the section talking about overcategorizing, I believe)).  (I'm watching this page, so feel free to respond here.)--[[User:GargoyleMT|GargoyleMT]] 16:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

533701 +++$+++ Townlake +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-10 06:23:00 +++$+++ 1.236691380E09 +++$+++ You recently closed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Nabil_Rastani_:history_of_ancient_Iran this book-related AFD as speedy delete per A7] - but doesn't A7 specifically say it's not to be used for books?  Just wondering.  +++$+++ You recently closed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nabil_Rastani_:history_of_ancient_Iran this book-related AFD as speedy delete per A7] - but doesn't A7 specifically say it's not to be used for books?  Just wondering. [[User:Townlake|Townlake]] ([[User talk:Townlake|talk]]) 06:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
533702 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533701 +++$+++ 533701 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.236692580E09 +++$+++ Hm, right... I should have chosen A1 or A3. The article was hopeless anyway.--''' +++$+++ : Hm, right... I should have chosen A1 or A3. The article was hopeless anyway.--'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 06:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

271558 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-03 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.265263200E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, thanks for looking over this. It does need quite a bit of work, and I've been considering sending it to FAR for a while. What do you think? &ndash;''' +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, thanks for looking over this. It does need quite a bit of work, and I've been considering sending it to FAR for a while. What do you think? &ndash;'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 22:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
271559 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271558 +++$+++ 271558 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.265263860E09 +++$+++ Mostly it is a problem with the sources. And perhaps some tightening up of the language. It doesn't look hopeless. Couldn't it be fixed up?  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Mostly it is a problem with the sources. And perhaps some tightening up of the language. It doesn't look hopeless. Couldn't it be fixed up?  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:11, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

533703 +++$+++ Yohan euan o4 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533703 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-10 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.236738240E09 +++$+++ Hi again. I'll try to have a look at it over the next few days (if I can find time). I think more could be done with the race section, just to flesh it out a bit.  +++$+++ Hi again. I'll try to have a look at it over the next few days (if I can find time). I think more could be done with the race section, just to flesh it out a bit. [[User:Yohan euan o4|Yohan euan o4]] ([[User talk:Yohan euan o4|talk]]) 19:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
533704 +++$+++ ImperatorExercitus +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533703 +++$+++ 533703 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.236797700E09 +++$+++ Just noticed the above :\/ Cheers. ''' +++$+++ :Just noticed the above :/ Cheers. '''[[User:ImperatorExercitus|<font color=#4169E1">Im</font><font color=#7B68EE>per</font><font color=#6495ED>a</font><font color=#87CEFA>t</font><font color=#4682B4>§ r</font>]]<sup>([[User_Talk:ImperatorExercitus|Talk]])</sup>''' 11:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

533705 +++$+++  Backslash Forwardslash +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533705 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-13 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.237003620E09 +++$+++ Hello Tone! I noticed quite a few of your recent article creations showing up in the [[Special:NewPages|new pages log]]. Since they are being created at an impressive speed, is it possible you are using a bot or a script to make these creations? I ask only because the New Pages log is getting quite clogged with those new articles. Cheers! &lowast;  +++$+++ Hello Tone! I noticed quite a few of your recent article creations showing up in the [[Special:NewPages|new pages log]]. Since they are being created at an impressive speed, is it possible you are using a bot or a script to make these creations? I ask only because the New Pages log is getting quite clogged with those new articles. Cheers! &lowast; [[User:Backslash Forwardslash|\ /]] ([[User_Talk: Backslash Forwardslash|⁂]]) 21:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
533706 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533705 +++$+++ 533705 +++$+++ 2009-03-13 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.237003860E09 +++$+++ Hi. Thank you for your concern. No, it is not a bot, these are more or less a setup style articles made using copy-pasting. At least, I am an admin so they do not appear yellow ;-) Anyway, I think I've had enough for today. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Thank you for your concern. No, it is not a bot, these are more or less a setup style articles made using copy-pasting. At least, I am an admin so they do not appear yellow ;-) Anyway, I think I've had enough for today. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:11, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

271562 +++$+++ Rusty Cashman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271562 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-04 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.265342520E09 +++$+++ I have been working mostly by myself on the article and I think it could use a fresh pair of eyes. I remember all you did to improve [[history of evolutionary thought]] and [[On the Origin of Species]] and I thought you might be able to help with [[Mary Anning]] also if you found it interesting. I am hoping to nominate it for GA soon. I know you are always busy with lots of different things on Wikipedia, but if you do have the time to take a quick look I would certainly appreciate it. Thanks  +++$+++ I have been working mostly by myself on the article and I think it could use a fresh pair of eyes. I remember all you did to improve [[history of evolutionary thought]] and [[On the Origin of Species]] and I thought you might be able to help with [[Mary Anning]] also if you found it interesting. I am hoping to nominate it for GA soon. I know you are always busy with lots of different things on Wikipedia, but if you do have the time to take a quick look I would certainly appreciate it. Thanks [[User:Rusty Cashman|Rusty Cashman]] ([[User talk:Rusty Cashman|talk]]) 20:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
271563 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271562 +++$+++ 271562 +++$+++ 2010-02-04 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.265343240E09 +++$+++ OK. I do find the article interesting.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :OK. I do find the article interesting.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
271564 +++$+++ Rusty Cashman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271562 +++$+++ 271563 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.265550360E09 +++$+++ Thanks, your writing clearly flows better than mine.  +++$+++ :: Thanks, your writing clearly flows better than mine. [[User:Rusty Cashman|Rusty Cashman]] ([[User talk:Rusty Cashman|talk]]) 05:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

533707 +++$+++ Jalen +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-14 08:33:00 +++$+++ 1.237044780E09 +++$+++ Some of the articles on Czechoslovakian hockey players you created yesterday lack original Czech\/Slovak spelling (\u0159, accent marks and the kind). Check here how some of them are spelt: [http:\/\/cs.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mistrovstv%C3%AD_sv%C4%9Bta_v_ledn%C3%ADm_hokeji_1949] [http:\/\/cs.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Seznam_%C4%8Desk%C3%BDch_olympijsk%C3%BDch_medailist%C5%AF]. Regards,  +++$+++ Some of the articles on Czechoslovakian hockey players you created yesterday lack original Czech/Slovak spelling (ř, accent marks and the kind). Check here how some of them are spelt: [http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistrovstv%C3%AD_sv%C4%9Bta_v_ledn%C3%ADm_hokeji_1949] [http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seznam_%C4%8Desk%C3%BDch_olympijsk%C3%BDch_medailist%C5%AF]. Regards, [[User:Jalen|Jalen]] ([[User talk:Jalen|talk]]) 08:33, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
533708 +++$+++ Doma-w +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533707 +++$+++ 533707 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 10:03:00 +++$+++ 1.237050180E09 +++$+++ Maybe you can show the correct ref to every article? The sports-reference links have all the correct spellings of the names? Also the DoBs can be added very easily from the refs? And I think these articles also need a <nowiki>{{DEFAULTSORT:}}<\/nowiki> or <nowiki>{{Lifetime}}<\/nowiki> and the correct medals? Or do you only want to turn red links into blues? Kind regards  +++$+++ :Maybe you can show the correct ref to every article? The sports-reference links have all the correct spellings of the names? Also the DoBs can be added very easily from the refs? And I think these articles also need a <nowiki>{{DEFAULTSORT:}}</nowiki> or <nowiki>{{Lifetime}}</nowiki> and the correct medals? Or do you only want to turn red links into blues? Kind regards [[User:Doma-w|Doma-w]] ([[User talk:Doma-w|talk]]) 10:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
533709 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533707 +++$+++ 533708 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.237052940E09 +++$+++ Thank you both for comments. I intended to get rid of those red links in the first place. I'll first do the redirects, the DoB and defaultsort will be done when I find some time. --''' +++$+++ :: Thank you both for comments. I intended to get rid of those red links in the first place. I'll first do the redirects, the DoB and defaultsort will be done when I find some time. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
533710 +++$+++ Doma-w +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533707 +++$+++ 533709 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.237055520E09 +++$+++ Hmm, isn't it better NOT to create article when you do not have the time? Isn't it better to create only a few articles, which meet wiki standard? I have spent ''years'' in correcting articles like these... Kind regards  +++$+++ :::Hmm, isn't it better NOT to create article when you do not have the time? Isn't it better to create only a few articles, which meet wiki standard? I have spent ''years'' in correcting articles like these... Kind regards [[User:Doma-w|Doma-w]] ([[User talk:Doma-w|talk]]) 11:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
533711 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533707 +++$+++ 533710 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.237058520E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I know... Well, I'll go through them some time. --''' +++$+++ :::: Yeah, I know... Well, I'll go through them some time. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

271566 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-05 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.265368860E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. Graham87 agreed to be interviewed. Would you like to co-write an article with me (it would go in the Special Story section of SignPost). I'd be honored if you agreed to do so. Regards. -- +++$+++ Hi Mattisse. Graham87 agreed to be interviewed. Would you like to co-write an article with me (it would go in the Special Story section of SignPost). I'd be honored if you agreed to do so. Regards. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 03:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
271567 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271566 +++$+++ 271566 +++$+++ 2010-02-05 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.265425680E09 +++$+++ Ok, I will co-write with you.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Ok, I will co-write with you.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
271568 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271566 +++$+++ 271567 +++$+++ 2010-02-05 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.265435520E09 +++$+++ Great! If I may suggest a modus-operandi, perhaps we could alternate questions and build an interview that way. Then, once we're done with the questions, we could write up the front end, think of a nice title - I thought of ''The Blind EditMaker'' but that may be too obvious :) - and go from there. I've set up a page [[User:RegentsPark\/Graham87Interview|here]] and, if this is fine with you, we can ask Graham87 to start responding. The good news - we've got plenty of time!. -- +++$+++ ::Great! If I may suggest a modus-operandi, perhaps we could alternate questions and build an interview that way. Then, once we're done with the questions, we could write up the front end, think of a nice title - I thought of ''The Blind EditMaker'' but that may be too obvious :) - and go from there. I've set up a page [[User:RegentsPark/Graham87Interview|here]] and, if this is fine with you, we can ask Graham87 to start responding. The good news - we've got plenty of time!. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 21:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
271569 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271566 +++$+++ 271568 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.265944740E09 +++$+++ I am sorry but I have been blocked. So I will not be contributing to the Signpost interview. Hope I am not letting you down but I cannot enjoy editing in the existing  atmosphere. As you know, my last contributions were to [[2010 Haitian earthquake]] which were nipped in the bud. As a result of that and the current block, I have lost interest in writing for Wikipedia.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::I am sorry but I have been blocked. So I will not be contributing to the Signpost interview. Hope I am not letting you down but I cannot enjoy editing in the existing  atmosphere. As you know, my last contributions were to [[2010 Haitian earthquake]] which were nipped in the bud. As a result of that and the current block, I have lost interest in writing for Wikipedia.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271570 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271566 +++$+++ 271569 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.265945520E09 +++$+++ I hope you change your mind. You know, one of the ways to get out of the catch-22 kind of mess you are in now, is to try to do something different. I understand your frustration and can see that the constant reference to your advisors is hardly designed to keep you in a happy place, but engaging in new areas with new people is one way of moving on. (Personally, I don't understand this fascination with FAC, or is it FA? IMO, the encyclopedia works better when many people do little things rather than when a few people do big things. Why not move around a bit and see this as an opportunity rather than as a road block?) -- +++$+++ ::::I hope you change your mind. You know, one of the ways to get out of the catch-22 kind of mess you are in now, is to try to do something different. I understand your frustration and can see that the constant reference to your advisors is hardly designed to keep you in a happy place, but engaging in new areas with new people is one way of moving on. (Personally, I don't understand this fascination with FAC, or is it FA? IMO, the encyclopedia works better when many people do little things rather than when a few people do big things. Why not move around a bit and see this as an opportunity rather than as a road block?) --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 19:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271571 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271566 +++$+++ 271570 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.265946000E09 +++$+++ I won't. I was having enough trouble being motivated. The [[2010 Haitian earthquake]] ban was a blow because that was the first time I had felt motivated to contribute substantially to an article for a long time. And I haven't since. It has become a grind. I was very interested in the Graham87 interview, but I just don't feel I am up to it now. Best not to count on me as I doubt I will be doing much in the future. Being  interested and involved and contributing just brings punishment. Wikipedia wants robot editors apparently, without feelings or  opinions.   \u2014 +++$+++ :::::I won't. I was having enough trouble being motivated. The [[2010 Haitian earthquake]] ban was a blow because that was the first time I had felt motivated to contribute substantially to an article for a long time. And I haven't since. It has become a grind. I was very interested in the Graham87 interview, but I just don't feel I am up to it now. Best not to count on me as I doubt I will be doing much in the future. Being  interested and involved and contributing just brings punishment. Wikipedia wants robot editors apparently, without feelings or  opinions.   —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271572 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271566 +++$+++ 271571 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.265955600E09 +++$+++ The interview will be worthwhile, but it is your choice. What I don't understand is why you get so het up about things. FAC is handing out stars to too many editors (if I understood you right) - so what? An editor is leaving but not leaving - why do you care? As Alice says toward the end of her adventure in wonderland (and there are strong parallels between wikiworld and wonderland!) ''Who cares for you. You're nothing but a pack of cards!''  -- +++$+++ ::::::The interview will be worthwhile, but it is your choice. What I don't understand is why you get so het up about things. FAC is handing out stars to too many editors (if I understood you right) - so what? An editor is leaving but not leaving - why do you care? As Alice says toward the end of her adventure in wonderland (and there are strong parallels between wikiworld and wonderland!) ''Who cares for you. You're nothing but a pack of cards!''  --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 22:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271573 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271566 +++$+++ 271572 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.265956320E09 +++$+++ You are right. I have no business having opinions and expressing them. I have no business interacting with the community. Just read Moni3's analysis and mind reading of my motivations for your answer. I have no business speaking for myself. <br> I get upset about things because I get blocked without warning contrary to My Plan. My mentors\/advisers do not consult with each other before punishing me, contrary to My Plan, others are allowed to insult me and treat me with disrespect, but if I word something unwisely, one of the two editors who make it their business to monitor everything I do can go running to my mentors\/advisers and I get punished for things that other to regularly with no repercussions. I have no interest in doing hard work in a situation where I only receive harassment and punishment. That is why I no longer write articles or do reviews, or copy edit for others.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::::You are right. I have no business having opinions and expressing them. I have no business interacting with the community. Just read Moni3's analysis and mind reading of my motivations for your answer. I have no business speaking for myself. <br> I get upset about things because I get blocked without warning contrary to My Plan. My mentors/advisers do not consult with each other before punishing me, contrary to My Plan, others are allowed to insult me and treat me with disrespect, but if I word something unwisely, one of the two editors who make it their business to monitor everything I do can go running to my mentors/advisers and I get punished for things that other to regularly with no repercussions. I have no interest in doing hard work in a situation where I only receive harassment and punishment. That is why I no longer write articles or do reviews, or copy edit for others.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

569549 +++$+++ Eluchil404 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-07 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.168165200E09 +++$+++ That section of the deletion policy has been rewritten slightly since I read it last, and I apologise if I was too bold in closing the AfD.  Since it was an unambiguous G7 speedy I thought it best to simply tag it and end the discussion rather than tag it and wait for an admin to delete it before closing the AfD.  +++$+++ That section of the deletion policy has been rewritten slightly since I read it last, and I apologise if I was too bold in closing the AfD.  Since it was an unambiguous G7 speedy I thought it best to simply tag it and end the discussion rather than tag it and wait for an admin to delete it before closing the AfD. [[User:Eluchil404|Eluchil404]] 02:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
569550 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569549 +++$+++ 569549 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.168165440E09 +++$+++ If you don't have the power to enforce your decision then closing the discussion isn't an option.  I'm not aware of a previous time when non-admins were permitted to close discussions that resulted in a 'delete' consensus.  It is good that you have now reviewed and are now aware of the current policy about closing AfDs. Regards,  +++$+++ :If you don't have the power to enforce your decision then closing the discussion isn't an option.  I'm not aware of a previous time when non-admins were permitted to close discussions that resulted in a 'delete' consensus.  It is good that you have now reviewed and are now aware of the current policy about closing AfDs. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 02:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

533712 +++$+++ 93.90.247.122 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533712 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-16 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.237225440E09 +++$+++ Hello! You have recently deleted an article about a freeware program called CintaNotes, arguing that it was 'blatant spam'. Could you please provide arguments? Otherwise I can't see how it's that this article is spam, but articles about similar (even not fully freeware!) programs (e.g. [[NotesHolder]]) are not spam. Notability of CintaNotes has been established. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions\/93.90.247.122|93.90.247.122]] ( +++$+++ Hello! You have recently deleted an article about a freeware program called CintaNotes, arguing that it was 'blatant spam'. Could you please provide arguments? Otherwise I can't see how it's that this article is spam, but articles about similar (even not fully freeware!) programs (e.g. [[NotesHolder]]) are not spam. Notability of CintaNotes has been established. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/93.90.247.122|93.90.247.122]] ([[User talk:93.90.247.122|talk]]) 10:44, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
533713 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533712 +++$+++ 533712 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.237259880E09 +++$+++ Hi. Sorry, I disagree. First, notability is not established in the article. Second, listing just technical details without any external references is not ok. Regarding the article you mention, that one claims to have won 10 awards. Well, there is no source for that but there is at least a claim of notability. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Sorry, I disagree. First, notability is not established in the article. Second, listing just technical details without any external references is not ok. Regarding the article you mention, that one claims to have won 10 awards. Well, there is no source for that but there is at least a claim of notability. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
533714 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533712 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.237300500E09 +++$+++ Ok, great. If you include those in the article, I'll be perfectly happy :-) The thing is that the article has to show that the subject is notable, it's not up to the reader to surf the web to find it. Restored now. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ ::: Ok, great. If you include those in the article, I'll be perfectly happy :-) The thing is that the article has to show that the subject is notable, it's not up to the reader to surf the web to find it. Restored now. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
533715 +++$+++ Alexjenter +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533712 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.237301640E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I'll do that. Best regards.  +++$+++ :::: Thanks! I'll do that. Best regards. [[User:Alexjenter|Alexjenter]] ([[User talk:Alexjenter|talk]]) 07:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

9425 +++$+++ Dragonbones +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9425 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-27 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.143457440E09 +++$+++ Why did you change \"tail\" to \"goose-tail\" in the description of clerical script on the E. Asian calligraphy page? Is this a common English description? If so, can you provide a reference? Or is it your translation from Chinese, in which case could you please provide the characters for goose tail? Providing explanations of and references for changes you make is better than just changing things without explaining it. Thanks in advance for your clarification. Cheers! +++$+++ Why did you change "tail" to "goose-tail" in the description of clerical script on the E. Asian calligraphy page? Is this a common English description? If so, can you provide a reference? Or is it your translation from Chinese, in which case could you please provide the characters for goose tail? Providing explanations of and references for changes you make is better than just changing things without explaining it. Thanks in advance for your clarification. Cheers![[User:Dragonbones|Dragonbones]] 03:04, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
9426 +++$+++ Dragonbones +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9425 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-28 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.143537720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your response! I have been tracking the answer down in the meantime, and discovered the expression \"silkworm head and wild goose tail\" in Chinese. Very interesting! But since it's not a standard English expression, rather than introducing it as and English 'term', I've rewritten it as follows: \"Most noticeable is the dramatically flared tail of one dominant horizontal or downward-diagonal stroke, especially that to the lower right. This characteristic stroke has famously been called 'silkworm head and wild goose tail' (\u8836\u982d\u96c1\u5c3e c\xe1nt\xf3u y\xe0nw\u011bi\uff09in Chinese due to its distinctive shape.\" This certainly adds some color, no? :) BTW, I've been doing some reading on ancient scripts, from oracle bones to seal script, and have discovered that the main way to write was always with a brush, not carving in bone or wood or casting in bronzes. There's a popular misconception about this because it's mainly the harder, carved materials which survived. This is relevant to a recent addition of yours on seal script; just FYI. You might want to read Qiu Xigui for a serious but readable intro on the topic (see references on Asian Calligraphy page). Cheers! +++$+++ ::Thanks for your response! I have been tracking the answer down in the meantime, and discovered the expression "silkworm head and wild goose tail" in Chinese. Very interesting! But since it's not a standard English expression, rather than introducing it as and English 'term', I've rewritten it as follows: "Most noticeable is the dramatically flared tail of one dominant horizontal or downward-diagonal stroke, especially that to the lower right. This characteristic stroke has famously been called 'silkworm head and wild goose tail' (蠶頭雁尾 cántóu yànwěi）in Chinese due to its distinctive shape." This certainly adds some color, no? :) BTW, I've been doing some reading on ancient scripts, from oracle bones to seal script, and have discovered that the main way to write was always with a brush, not carving in bone or wood or casting in bronzes. There's a popular misconception about this because it's mainly the harder, carved materials which survived. This is relevant to a recent addition of yours on seal script; just FYI. You might want to read Qiu Xigui for a serious but readable intro on the topic (see references on Asian Calligraphy page). Cheers![[User:Dragonbones|Dragonbones]] 01:22, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

533718 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-18 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.237424760E09 +++$+++ Can you undelete [[National Wholesale Liquidators]] please? I was about to add some sources and fix it up, as it is irrefutably a notable chain (plenty of sources exist).  +++$+++ Can you undelete [[National Wholesale Liquidators]] please? I was about to add some sources and fix it up, as it is irrefutably a notable chain (plenty of sources exist). [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 18:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
533719 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533718 +++$+++ 533718 +++$+++ 2009-03-18 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.237425360E09 +++$+++ Never mind, someone else got it. DGG removed the speedy tags at least once, saying he disagreed with them, and an IP restored them blindly, including adding a totally uncalled for G3 tag. I still don't see how the page was ever G11 worthy.  +++$+++ *Never mind, someone else got it. DGG removed the speedy tags at least once, saying he disagreed with them, and an IP restored them blindly, including adding a totally uncalled for G3 tag. I still don't see how the page was ever G11 worthy. [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 18:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

271575 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-06 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.265467380E09 +++$+++ But if you're too busy right now, I totally understand, so don't feel like you're under any obligation to look at this. <b class=\"IPA\"> +++$+++ But if you're too busy right now, I totally understand, so don't feel like you're under any obligation to look at this. <b class="IPA">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 06:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
271576 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271575 +++$+++ 271575 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.265543220E09 +++$+++ I really don't like to get mixed up with an article that is going to FAC at this point. I wouldn't want to follow it through the process there, so it is best I turn down your request. Pity, as I have really liked and supported your previous articles through FAC. But I have not been copy editing articles for FAC for quite a while and don't see that changing in the immediate future.  Makes for a happier wiki life.  Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ :I really don't like to get mixed up with an article that is going to FAC at this point. I wouldn't want to follow it through the process there, so it is best I turn down your request. Pity, as I have really liked and supported your previous articles through FAC. But I have not been copy editing articles for FAC for quite a while and don't see that changing in the immediate future.  Makes for a happier wiki life.  Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 03:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
271577 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271575 +++$+++ 271576 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.265871840E09 +++$+++ Ah, no worries. That's totally understandable, given there appears to be some bad blood there. Anyway, I hope all is well! Best, <b class=\"IPA\"> +++$+++ ::Ah, no worries. That's totally understandable, given there appears to be some bad blood there. Anyway, I hope all is well! Best, <b class="IPA">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 23:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
271578 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271575 +++$+++ 271577 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.265885820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for understanding. I regard you articles highly, and may be willing to help in the future. You create unieque articles on subject matter that is not common on Wikipedia. Not the same old stuff. I really value that. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::Thanks for understanding. I regard you articles highly, and may be willing to help in the future. You create unieque articles on subject matter that is not common on Wikipedia. Not the same old stuff. I really value that. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

533721 +++$+++ SoWhy +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533721 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-19 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.237520760E09 +++$+++ Would you mind explaining why you speedy-closed this AFD although it does not meet CSD#G11 (or any other speedy criterion) and although it was just relisted hours earlier by consensus on [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\/Log\/2009 March 18]] and the deleting admins decision? Regards ''' +++$+++ Would you mind explaining why you speedy-closed this AFD although it does not meet CSD#G11 (or any other speedy criterion) and although it was just relisted hours earlier by consensus on [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 18]] and the deleting admins decision? Regards '''[[User:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #AC0000">So</span>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #1F3F53">Why</span>]]''' 20:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
533722 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533721 +++$+++ 533721 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.237521780E09 +++$+++ Aha, I see where the problem is. I saw the article got relisted because of no consensus, after that many votes established what appeared as a consensus to me. I was not aware of DRV since it was not mentioned in the nomination (I suppose that is something the relisting admin  shouldn't have forgotten mentioning). Anyway, now I have read the discussion and I have no objection in leaving the AfD take it's full time. Will you restore it or should I? Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Aha, I see where the problem is. I saw the article got relisted because of no consensus, after that many votes established what appeared as a consensus to me. I was not aware of DRV since it was not mentioned in the nomination (I suppose that is something the relisting admin  shouldn't have forgotten mentioning). Anyway, now I have read the discussion and I have no objection in leaving the AfD take it's full time. Will you restore it or should I? Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:03, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
533723 +++$+++ SoWhy +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533721 +++$+++ 533722 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.237523400E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see. I used a modified relist template to indicate that the AFD was closed for 2 days before being reopened. Seeing that I commented both in the DRV and the AFD, I think you should do it. Regards ''' +++$+++ ::Ah, I see. I used a modified relist template to indicate that the AFD was closed for 2 days before being reopened. Seeing that I commented both in the DRV and the AFD, I think you should do it. Regards '''[[User:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #AC0000">So</span>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #1F3F53">Why</span>]]''' 21:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
533724 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533721 +++$+++ 533723 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.237524540E09 +++$+++ Done. I let a note at the AfD to prevent another speedy. Regards. --''' +++$+++ ::: Done. I let a note at the AfD to prevent another speedy. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:49, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

271579 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-07 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.265532660E09 +++$+++ I have asked five times at [[WT:WIAFA]] that you stop making implications about FAC editors and stay on topic (Public domain text).  Please consult your advisors.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_criteria&curid=748814&diff=342393695&oldid=342392581]   +++$+++ I have asked five times at [[WT:WIAFA]] that you stop making implications about FAC editors and stay on topic (Public domain text).  Please consult your advisors.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_criteria&curid=748814&diff=342393695&oldid=342392581]  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
271580 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271579 +++$+++ 271579 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.265532840E09 +++$+++ I merely quoted a suggestion from above from [[User:Mike Christie|Mike Christie]]. Perhaps you should allow me to have a say. \u2014 +++$+++ :I merely quoted a suggestion from above from [[User:Mike Christie|Mike Christie]]. Perhaps you should allow me to have a say. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
271581 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271579 +++$+++ 271580 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.265536620E09 +++$+++ When you say things that don't make implications about FAC or FAC reviewers or editors participating in a discussion, they are very welcome.   +++$+++ :: When you say things that don't make implications about FAC or FAC reviewers or editors participating in a discussion, they are very welcome.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
271582 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271579 +++$+++ 271581 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.265543880E09 +++$+++ Thank you for those removals (the discussion is complex enough on its own :).   +++$+++ ::: Thank you for those removals (the discussion is complex enough on its own :).  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

271583 +++$+++ Victuallers +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-08 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.265661960E09 +++$+++ Thx for ticking Lowes Dickinson. Your comment about the image map was ambiguous (to me). Did you mean that you couldnt work out what it was? If so then run a cursor over the picture.... If you mean you think the image map is a confusion for the main page then I can change it to a jpg. Oh and hello again  +++$+++ Thx for ticking Lowes Dickinson. Your comment about the image map was ambiguous (to me). Did you mean that you couldnt work out what it was? If so then run a cursor over the picture.... If you mean you think the image map is a confusion for the main page then I can change it to a jpg. Oh and hello again [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 12:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
271584 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271583 +++$+++ 271583 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.265667000E09 +++$+++ Hi, I meant that I could not click on the image map when it was a thumbnail (which it would be on the main page) to make it bigger, so I never could apply the cursor unless I was already in the article. Also, is it an image that can be freely used?  Regards,  \u2014 +++$+++ :Hi, I meant that I could not click on the image map when it was a thumbnail (which it would be on the main page) to make it bigger, so I never could apply the cursor unless I was already in the article. Also, is it an image that can be freely used?  Regards,  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 14:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

271585 +++$+++ Victuallers +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-08 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.265694240E09 +++$+++ Oh OK, it is tricky to see the image so small - its only a gimmick at that size and yes wikipedia (and me) consider it is a free image. The National Portrait Gallery are threatening court action but wikipedia are resolute. If any admin had an issue then I'm sure another could be found.  +++$+++ Oh OK, it is tricky to see the image so small - its only a gimmick at that size and yes wikipedia (and me) consider it is a free image. The National Portrait Gallery are threatening court action but wikipedia are resolute. If any admin had an issue then I'm sure another could be found. [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 21:44, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
271586 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271585 +++$+++ 271585 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.265795640E09 +++$+++ replied on talk page.  \u2014 +++$+++ :replied on talk page.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:54, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
271587 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271585 +++$+++ 271585 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.265843700E09 +++$+++ replied on talk page.  \u2014 +++$+++ :replied on talk page.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

271588 +++$+++ Leszek Jańczuk +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271588 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-10 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.265869500E09 +++$+++ I am not sure is the article [[Franz Anton Knittel]] is long enough for the DYK nom. The article is based on this source [http:\/\/books.google.pl\/books?id=UqkdB8a759gC&pg=PA171&lpg=#v=onepage&q=&f=false (1830)].  +++$+++ I am not sure is the article [[Franz Anton Knittel]] is long enough for the DYK nom. The article is based on this source [http://books.google.pl/books?id=UqkdB8a759gC&pg=PA171&lpg=#v=onepage&q=&f=false (1830)]. [[User:Leszek Jańczuk|Leszek Jańczuk]] ([[User talk:Leszek Jańczuk|talk]]) 22:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
271589 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271588 +++$+++ 271588 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.265870040E09 +++$+++ Based on dyk character count, it has 2219 characters. So it is long enough.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Based on dyk character count, it has 2219 characters. So it is long enough.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
271590 +++$+++ Leszek Jańczuk +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271588 +++$+++ 271589 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.265883960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I did not find it on this page \"User:AlexNewArtBot\/GoodSearchResult  (links)\", that's why I was asking. Thanks for your time.  +++$+++ :: Thanks. I did not find it on this page "User:AlexNewArtBot/GoodSearchResult  (links)", that's why I was asking. Thanks for your time. [[User:Leszek Jańczuk|Leszek Jańczuk]] ([[User talk:Leszek Jańczuk|talk]]) 02:26, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271591 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271588 +++$+++ 271590 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.265884200E09 +++$+++ I have found that bot to be unreliable in picking up articles. So I would not depend on it if I were you.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::I have found that bot to be unreliable in picking up articles. So I would not depend on it if I were you.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:30, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

9445 +++$+++ Miborovsky +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-26 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.156585380E09 +++$+++ It might be confused with the Qin Dynasty... although there isn't one such project. May I suggest a rename to {{tl|Guqin project}}? -- '''[[User talk:Miborovsky|\u041c\u0438\u0431\u043e\u0440\u043e]] +++$+++ It might be confused with the Qin Dynasty... although there isn't one such project. May I suggest a rename to {{tl|Guqin project}}? -- '''[[User talk:Miborovsky|Миборо]][[User:Miborovsky/B|<font color="#FF0000">в</font>]][[User talk:Miborovsky|ский]]''' 02:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
9446 +++$+++ Miborovsky +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9445 +++$+++ 9445 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.156619400E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks. -- '''[[User talk:Miborovsky|\u041c\u0438\u0431\u043e\u0440\u043e]] +++$+++ :OK, thanks. -- '''[[User talk:Miborovsky|Миборо]][[User:Miborovsky/B|<font color="#FF0000">в</font>]][[User talk:Miborovsky|ский]]''' 12:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

533735 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-22 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.237723140E09 +++$+++ You wouldn't know if [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/luxbrand\/3373168079\/ this] is a free image, would you? It would be perfect for ITN... --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ You wouldn't know if [http://www.flickr.com/photos/luxbrand/3373168079/ this] is a free image, would you? It would be perfect for ITN... --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 04:59, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
533736 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533735 +++$+++ 533735 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.237749300E09 +++$+++ It says all rights reserved on the right. So, no, too bad. --''' +++$+++ : It says all rights reserved on the right. So, no, too bad. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

271592 +++$+++ ChildofMidnight +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-11 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.265883060E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, is it necessary for you to post on Malleus's talk page? It sure looks like you're doing the worst kind of poking and baiting. If I'm off-base I apologize, but it seems to me that you are also a good editor who gets frustrated with some of the disputes that go on here, so I'm suprise that you would be engaged in making comments that aren't constructive when someone is fed up. Again, if I'm misunderstanding I apologize. I'm tired. And I'm off. Cheers. Take care.  +++$+++ Mattisse, is it necessary for you to post on Malleus's talk page? It sure looks like you're doing the worst kind of poking and baiting. If I'm off-base I apologize, but it seems to me that you are also a good editor who gets frustrated with some of the disputes that go on here, so I'm suprise that you would be engaged in making comments that aren't constructive when someone is fed up. Again, if I'm misunderstanding I apologize. I'm tired. And I'm off. Cheers. Take care. [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 02:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271593 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271592 +++$+++ 271592 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.265883240E09 +++$+++ Well, if it seems that way to you, I will stop. I am tired of the repeated retirements, but that is my problem. It saps the community energy and I don't condone his repeated attacks on certain editors on the basis of their age. Do you agree that editors should be attacked on the basis of age?  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :Well, if it seems that way to you, I will stop. I am tired of the repeated retirements, but that is my problem. It saps the community energy and I don't condone his repeated attacks on certain editors on the basis of their age. Do you agree that editors should be attacked on the basis of age?  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271594 +++$+++ ChildofMidnight +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271592 +++$+++ 271593 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.265885280E09 +++$+++ But anyway, I appreciate your taking my comment in the good faith with which it was offered. I'm a big believer in karma. So sow kindness whenever you can even amongst those you don't like. And do as I say not as I do! That last one's most important. Take it easy Mattisse. And let me know if you want my \"help\" on anything. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::But anyway, I appreciate your taking my comment in the good faith with which it was offered. I'm a big believer in karma. So sow kindness whenever you can even amongst those you don't like. And do as I say not as I do! That last one's most important. Take it easy Mattisse. And let me know if you want my "help" on anything. Cheers. [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 02:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271595 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271592 +++$+++ 271594 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.265885520E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your perspective. And thanks for your offer. It is greatly appreciated. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::Thank you for your perspective. And thanks for your offer. It is greatly appreciated. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

533737 +++$+++ Pietru +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-22 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.237752000E09 +++$+++ Hey there. You semi-protected [[Maltese people]] yesterday after a sockpuppeteer posed as an anon and began disrupting the article. He has since threatened to stalk my future edits on Wikipedia. Is there anything I can do to counter-act this, or somewhere suitable to raise this issue? Cheers,  +++$+++ Hey there. You semi-protected [[Maltese people]] yesterday after a sockpuppeteer posed as an anon and began disrupting the article. He has since threatened to stalk my future edits on Wikipedia. Is there anything I can do to counter-act this, or somewhere suitable to raise this issue? Cheers, [[User:Pietru|we are a marvelous Machine]] ([[User talk:Pietru|talk]]) 13:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
533738 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533737 +++$+++ 533737 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.237752780E09 +++$+++ You can't really help with that, everyone can see your edit history. However, there are some remedies if this leads in edit warring (block) ;-) Don't worry. --''' +++$+++ : You can't really help with that, everyone can see your edit history. However, there are some remedies if this leads in edit warring (block) ;-) Don't worry. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
533739 +++$+++ Pietru +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533737 +++$+++ 533738 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.237752960E09 +++$+++ Alright then, hopefully it won't come to that! Although now he's back and just arguing :-( not pleasant.  +++$+++ ::Alright then, hopefully it won't come to that! Although now he's back and just arguing :-( not pleasant. [[User:Pietru|we are a marvelous Machine]] ([[User talk:Pietru|talk]]) 13:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
533740 +++$+++ Pietru +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533737 +++$+++ 533737 +++$+++ 2009-03-24 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.237955820E09 +++$+++ Here's some additional information regarding the IP's connection to [[User:Iamandrewrice]] and it's trolling MO: it is from the same range as a third of known accounts used by this editor, and traces back to the exact same place as all of them. The editor's bizarre behaviour is identical, as are the articles edited. [[User:Knepflerle]] offered this salient suggestion on a possible course of action: ''(Only a handful of fairly narrow bands of IPs are being used) - someone ought to look into which of them can be rangeblocked without collateral damage.''  +++$+++ :Here's some additional information regarding the IP's connection to [[User:Iamandrewrice]] and it's trolling MO: it is from the same range as a third of known accounts used by this editor, and traces back to the exact same place as all of them. The editor's bizarre behaviour is identical, as are the articles edited. [[User:Knepflerle]] offered this salient suggestion on a possible course of action: ''(Only a handful of fairly narrow bands of IPs are being used) - someone ought to look into which of them can be rangeblocked without collateral damage.'' [[User:Pietru|Pietru]] ([[User talk:Pietru|talk]]) 21:37, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
533741 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533737 +++$+++ 533740 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.238018220E09 +++$+++ Hm, I don't have many experiences with rangeblocks, maybe you should ask at the ANI again? --''' +++$+++ :: Hm, I don't have many experiences with rangeblocks, maybe you should ask at the ANI again? --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

271596 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-11 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.265910660E09 +++$+++ I have just read Malleus's talk page. The good point to consider here is that you disengaged after ChildofMidnight pointed out that you were out of order. The disturbing point is that even at this stage you had to be told to disengage, and that you got involved in the first place. Getting involved in a squabble because somebody disagrees with your editing on an article is one thing. Reacting to comments about you is one thing. But deliberately posting provocative comments on somebody's talkpage is quite another - especially after you have been repeatedly warned not to do this. We can't let this incident go Mattisse. We can't simply shake our head after the event and say that you were naughty, but how good you were to disengage when asked - because the damage has already been done. I have given you a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Mattisse\/Archive_26#Warning warning] about this - and that warning was directly in relation to the same person. In line with that warning, and the agreed [[User:Mattisse\/Plan#Consequences_for_failure_to_adhere_to_plan|procedure in your Plan]] I am now blocking you for 24 hours and will consult with the others as to how we are to proceed. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ I have just read Malleus's talk page. The good point to consider here is that you disengaged after ChildofMidnight pointed out that you were out of order. The disturbing point is that even at this stage you had to be told to disengage, and that you got involved in the first place. Getting involved in a squabble because somebody disagrees with your editing on an article is one thing. Reacting to comments about you is one thing. But deliberately posting provocative comments on somebody's talkpage is quite another - especially after you have been repeatedly warned not to do this. We can't let this incident go Mattisse. We can't simply shake our head after the event and say that you were naughty, but how good you were to disengage when asked - because the damage has already been done. I have given you a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mattisse/Archive_26#Warning warning] about this - and that warning was directly in relation to the same person. In line with that warning, and the agreed [[User:Mattisse/Plan#Consequences_for_failure_to_adhere_to_plan|procedure in your Plan]] I am now blocking you for 24 hours and will consult with the others as to how we are to proceed. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 09:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271597 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271596 +++$+++ 271596 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.265947140E09 +++$+++ In my opinion, a large part of the problem is that you treat me like a \"naughty\" child. If you treated me like an adult, I think my response would be better.  \u2014 +++$+++ :In my opinion, a large part of the problem is that you treat me like a "naughty" child. If you treated me like an adult, I think my response would be better.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:59, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

569554 +++$+++ Guitarmankev1 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-07 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.168224540E09 +++$+++ I wasn't aware of that policy, yet I was only trying to make other people aware of what was going on, and I was using the same message so that I wouldn't have to type it over and over again. A question, though. How are other people supposed to become aware of the vote if I cannot notify them? Again, I apologise and I did not mean to violate policy. -  +++$+++ I wasn't aware of that policy, yet I was only trying to make other people aware of what was going on, and I was using the same message so that I wouldn't have to type it over and over again. A question, though. How are other people supposed to become aware of the vote if I cannot notify them? Again, I apologise and I did not mean to violate policy. - [[User:Guitarmankev1|Kevin ]][[User_talk:Guitarmankev1|<sup>(TALK)</sup>]] 18:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
569555 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569554 +++$+++ 569554 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.168225320E09 +++$+++ The page is tagged with a link to the MfD discussion.  Interested editors can find the discussion that way. I'm sure that you didn't mean to violate policy but I was obliged to warn you when I found out.  +++$+++ :The page is tagged with a link to the MfD discussion.  Interested editors can find the discussion that way. I'm sure that you didn't mean to violate policy but I was obliged to warn you when I found out. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 19:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
569556 +++$+++ Guitarmankev1 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569554 +++$+++ 569555 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.168225500E09 +++$+++ Ok, that makes sense. And I'm not holding anything against you, since it ''is'' policy. Thanks for working this out calmly. -  +++$+++ ::Ok, that makes sense. And I'm not holding anything against you, since it ''is'' policy. Thanks for working this out calmly. - [[User:Guitarmankev1|Kevin ]][[User_talk:Guitarmankev1|<sup>(TALK)</sup>]] 19:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

9454 +++$+++ Heligoland +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-19 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.163924400E09 +++$+++ Hi, Your making some great edits to Wikipedia, but I've noticed a few edits on my Watchlist where you've not used an Edit Summary, even this small 30 second action can be a great help to Wikipedia, as it allows RC and Vandalism patrollers to better understand why and edit has been made and what was done. Once again, many thanks for your edits to Wikipedia. Best wishes and <font face=\"Arial\" color=\"#27408B\" size=\"2\">'''Kind Regards - '''<\/font> +++$+++ Hi, Your making some great edits to Wikipedia, but I've noticed a few edits on my Watchlist where you've not used an Edit Summary, even this small 30 second action can be a great help to Wikipedia, as it allows RC and Vandalism patrollers to better understand why and edit has been made and what was done. Once again, many thanks for your edits to Wikipedia. Best wishes and <font face="Arial" color="#27408B" size="2">'''Kind Regards - '''</font>[[User:Heligoland|<font face="Arial" color="#27408B" size="2">'''Heligoland '''</font>]] |  [[User talk:Heligoland|<font face="Arial" color="#27408B" size="2">'''Talk'''</font>]] |  [[Special:Contributions/Heligoland|<font face="Arial" color="#27408B" size="2">'''Contribs'''</font>]] 00:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
9455 +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9454 +++$+++ 9454 +++$+++ 2006-11-22 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.164241560E09 +++$+++ Hi Mei Sie. It would be better to bring the discussion onto my music forum (look under '''Links''' at the top). I can respond more effectively there. -- +++$+++ *Hi Mei Sie. It would be better to bring the discussion onto my music forum (look under '''Links''' at the top). I can respond more effectively there. --[[User:CharlieHuang|Charlie Huang 【正矗昊】]] 16:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

613245 +++$+++ Benjiboi +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-16 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.216271160E09 +++$+++ Hi, [[Talk:Racism]] is waaaay too huge with over 115 talk threads. Would you be willing to help tag talk sections with {{TL|resolved}} and {{tl|stale}} as appropriate so we can start archiving old talk threads? Even a few at time will help! Thank you!  +++$+++ Hi, [[Talk:Racism]] is waaaay too huge with over 115 talk threads. Would you be willing to help tag talk sections with {{TL|resolved}} and {{tl|stale}} as appropriate so we can start archiving old talk threads? Even a few at time will help! Thank you! [[User_talk:Benjiboi|<small><u style="text-decoration:none;font-family: papyrus;color:#CC00CC">Banj<font color="#FF4400">e</font></u></small><u style="font-family: Zapfino, sans-serif;color:#8000FF">b<font color="#FF4400">oi</font></u>]] 22:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
613246 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613245 +++$+++ 613245 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.216349880E09 +++$+++ The spirit is willing but I'm rather overloaded just now, why not try announcing a cut off date on the talk page then archiving all discussions that were last edited before that date? Must archive this talk page now :-\/ . .   +++$+++ :The spirit is willing but I'm rather overloaded just now, why not try announcing a cut off date on the talk page then archiving all discussions that were last edited before that date? Must archive this talk page now :-/ . .  [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:58, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
613247 +++$+++ Benjiboi +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613245 +++$+++ 613246 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.216358520E09 +++$+++ Lol. I'm sure that would get some discussion going! We're doing well so far down to 65 or so and counting. We seem to be leaning towards auto-archiving the page once a thread has sat dormant for 45 days so it's all getting sorted. No worries either way.  +++$+++ ::Lol. I'm sure that would get some discussion going! We're doing well so far down to 65 or so and counting. We seem to be leaning towards auto-archiving the page once a thread has sat dormant for 45 days so it's all getting sorted. No worries either way. [[User_talk:Benjiboi|<small><u style="text-decoration:none;font-family: papyrus;color:#CC00CC">Banj<font color="#FF4400">e</font></u></small><u style="font-family: Zapfino, sans-serif;color:#8000FF">b<font color="#FF4400">oi</font></u>]] 22:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

9457 +++$+++ Badagnani +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-04 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.165272300E09 +++$+++ OK, I think I've figured it out (and made the requisite changes). The first character, \u96c5, is the one for ''yayue'', so that's not right.  The second character, \u8f67, is the one for [[yazheng]], and the third character, \u7259, is the one Koreans use for their [[ajaeng]].   +++$+++ OK, I think I've figured it out (and made the requisite changes). The first character, 雅, is the one for ''yayue'', so that's not right.  The second character, 轧, is the one for [[yazheng]], and the third character, 牙, is the one Koreans use for their [[ajaeng]].  [[User:Badagnani|Badagnani]] 14:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
9458 +++$+++  +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9457 +++$+++ 9457 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ http:\/\/www.zgsd.net\/views.asp?PLUCODE=7805685523003 --Charlie Huang \u3010\u6b63\u77d7\u660a\u3011 11:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ *http://www.zgsd.net/views.asp?PLUCODE=7805685523003 --Charlie Huang 【正矗昊】 11:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
9459 +++$+++  +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9457 +++$+++ 9457 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ http:\/\/hkall.hku.hk\/search\/t%7Bu7434%7D%7Bu5B78%7D%7Bu53E2%7D%7Bu66F8%7D\/t%7B214b4d%7D%7B213a60%7D%7B21352b%7D%7B214355%7D\/13%2C29%2C32%2CB\/frameset&FF=t%7B214b4d%7D%7B213a60%7D%7B21352b%7D%7B214355%7D+++43%7B21407b%7D&1%2C1%2C --Charlie Huang \u3010\u6b63\u77d7\u660a\u3011 12:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ *http://hkall.hku.hk/search/t%7Bu7434%7D%7Bu5B78%7D%7Bu53E2%7D%7Bu66F8%7D/t%7B214b4d%7D%7B213a60%7D%7B21352b%7D%7B214355%7D/13%2C29%2C32%2CB/frameset&FF=t%7B214b4d%7D%7B213a60%7D%7B21352b%7D%7B214355%7D+++43%7B21407b%7D&1%2C1%2C --Charlie Huang 【正矗昊】 12:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
9460 +++$+++  +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9457 +++$+++ 9457 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ http:\/\/nbinet.ncl.edu.tw\/search*chi\/t%7B214b4d%7D%7B213a60%7D%7B21352b%7D%7B214355%7D\/t12%7B214b4d%7D16%7B213a60%7D18%7B21352b%7D10%7B214355%7D\/1%2C2%2C6%2CB\/frameset&FF=t12%7B214b4d%7D16%7B213a60%7D18%7B21352b%7D10%7B214355%7D&5%2C%2C5 --Charlie Huang \u3010\u6b63\u77d7\u660a\u3011 12:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ *http://nbinet.ncl.edu.tw/search*chi/t%7B214b4d%7D%7B213a60%7D%7B21352b%7D%7B214355%7D/t12%7B214b4d%7D16%7B213a60%7D18%7B21352b%7D10%7B214355%7D/1%2C2%2C6%2CB/frameset&FF=t12%7B214b4d%7D16%7B213a60%7D18%7B21352b%7D10%7B214355%7D&5%2C%2C5 --Charlie Huang 【正矗昊】 12:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
9461 +++$+++ Ekotkie +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9457 +++$+++ 9460 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.168470240E09 +++$+++ Hi Charlie, I need a little translation here please. I am merely one of a number of editors attempting to resolve over 2000 ISBN errors so that we may electronically convert the older 10 digit system to the newer 13 digit isbn system. If you are writing in regards to a page that I noted with a , you will note that at the bottom of that page there is also a flag note stating that this flag had an invalid isbn. If I made an inadvertent correction, please accept my apology. I am using a number of different research tools in an attempt to resolve isbn's in error. Please send me the name of the page name that you are asking about or the wikipedia url. I appreciate your support in resolving this matter.  +++$+++ :*Hi Charlie, I need a little translation here please. I am merely one of a number of editors attempting to resolve over 2000 ISBN errors so that we may electronically convert the older 10 digit system to the newer 13 digit isbn system. If you are writing in regards to a page that I noted with a , you will note that at the bottom of that page there is also a flag note stating that this flag had an invalid isbn. If I made an inadvertent correction, please accept my apology. I am using a number of different research tools in an attempt to resolve isbn's in error. Please send me the name of the page name that you are asking about or the wikipedia url. I appreciate your support in resolving this matter. [[User:Ekotkie|Ekotkie]] 15:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
9462 +++$+++  +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9457 +++$+++ 9457 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ The page in question is the guqin one. I have found and corrected the ISBN (I mistyped one number because it wasn't clearly printed on my copy of the book). --Charlie Huang \u3010\u6b63\u77d7\u660a\u3011 15:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ *The page in question is the guqin one. I have found and corrected the ISBN (I mistyped one number because it wasn't clearly printed on my copy of the book). --Charlie Huang 【正矗昊】 15:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
9463 +++$+++ Ekotkie +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9457 +++$+++ 9462 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.168476660E09 +++$+++ I somewhat recognized the cover page. Thank you for your assistance in correcting this matter. I was only interested in locating a correct 10 digit isbn. Wiki has a bot ready to go back through the entire library and convert over to the 13 digit isbn. There still is some concern about making this final move to 13 digit. I too understand the issue of making a typing error. I have made a number of them. Sometimes it comes from attempting to insert the hyphen into their proper location. I have quit using hyphen's all together. Most of the large catalog users only give a single string of numbers without hyphens. A final not, I hope that when you placed the correct isbn into its location that you also removed the error notification template that was originally placed by the reviewing bot. If you don't remove the template, a \"invalid ISBN\" statement will appear at the bottom of the page. Charlie, have a great day and thanks again for your help.  +++$+++ :*I somewhat recognized the cover page. Thank you for your assistance in correcting this matter. I was only interested in locating a correct 10 digit isbn. Wiki has a bot ready to go back through the entire library and convert over to the 13 digit isbn. There still is some concern about making this final move to 13 digit. I too understand the issue of making a typing error. I have made a number of them. Sometimes it comes from attempting to insert the hyphen into their proper location. I have quit using hyphen's all together. Most of the large catalog users only give a single string of numbers without hyphens. A final not, I hope that when you placed the correct isbn into its location that you also removed the error notification template that was originally placed by the reviewing bot. If you don't remove the template, a "invalid ISBN" statement will appear at the bottom of the page. Charlie, have a great day and thanks again for your help. [[User:Ekotkie|Ekotkie]] 16:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

533747 +++$+++ JavaTenor +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-24 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.237939020E09 +++$+++ It appears you closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Politism]] back in January and deleted the page [[Politism]], but missed the related subarticle [[Politist]], which still has an AFD notice on it.  When you get the chance, could you delete that one as well?  Thanks!  +++$+++ It appears you closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politism]] back in January and deleted the page [[Politism]], but missed the related subarticle [[Politist]], which still has an AFD notice on it.  When you get the chance, could you delete that one as well?  Thanks! [[User:JavaTenor|JavaTenor]] ([[User talk:JavaTenor|talk]]) 16:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
533748 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533747 +++$+++ 533747 +++$+++ 2009-03-24 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.237941540E09 +++$+++ Done. Thanks for noticing. --''' +++$+++ : Done. Thanks for noticing. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
533749 +++$+++ JavaTenor +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533747 +++$+++ 533748 +++$+++ 2009-03-24 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.237944300E09 +++$+++ Great, thanks for the responsiveness.  +++$+++ :: Great, thanks for the responsiveness. [[User:JavaTenor|JavaTenor]] ([[User talk:JavaTenor|talk]]) 18:25, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
533750 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533747 +++$+++ 533747 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.238018220E09 +++$+++ The above link leads to Radio-frequency identification. Could you be more specific where you want to post your article? Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : The above link leads to Radio-frequency identification. Could you be more specific where you want to post your article? Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

9464 +++$+++ Ekotkie +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.168564920E09 +++$+++ The ISBN (10 digit would be fine) as cited is incorrect and a \"Invalid ISBN\" tag is located at the bottom of the page.  If you can locate this book and ISBN,. Please go ahead and fix the error.  I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Ed_K  +++$+++ The ISBN (10 digit would be fine) as cited is incorrect and a "Invalid ISBN" tag is located at the bottom of the page.  If you can locate this book and ISBN,. Please go ahead and fix the error.  I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Ed_K [[User:Ekotkie|Ekotkie]] 17:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
9465 +++$+++  +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9464 +++$+++ 9464 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Charlie, I thank you for the assist and will duly note yours and my efforts. I tend to suspect a 23 page \"book\". It may well have been a thesis paper. Why it ended up with an ISBN is beyond me. I'll turn this over to the team leader and press on. We still have close to 2000 items to check out. I try to give a good search of foreign but sometimes its just better to have a contact in that language country. Again, thank you and I'll keep your name in my contact file. I would rather drop the ISBN all together and leave the source info for some other hardy soul to go dig for. Have a great day. Ed_KEkotkie 22:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :Charlie, I thank you for the assist and will duly note yours and my efforts. I tend to suspect a 23 page "book". It may well have been a thesis paper. Why it ended up with an ISBN is beyond me. I'll turn this over to the team leader and press on. We still have close to 2000 items to check out. I try to give a good search of foreign but sometimes its just better to have a contact in that language country. Again, thank you and I'll keep your name in my contact file. I would rather drop the ISBN all together and leave the source info for some other hardy soul to go dig for. Have a great day. Ed_KEkotkie 22:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

533754 +++$+++ Lear 21 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-29 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.238357280E09 +++$+++ Please respect that the currency image is a standard image in many country articles. At the Germany articles discussion page only one other editor has critised the currency. This editor (Husond) has also proposed an alternative image. The complete removal of the image is not backed by a majority consensus. Nor is it disputed in more than 10 country articles. Your edits need to concentrate at specific issues and not at blind reverts.  +++$+++ Please respect that the currency image is a standard image in many country articles. At the Germany articles discussion page only one other editor has critised the currency. This editor (Husond) has also proposed an alternative image. The complete removal of the image is not backed by a majority consensus. Nor is it disputed in more than 10 country articles. Your edits need to concentrate at specific issues and not at blind reverts. [[User:Lear 21|Lear 21]] ([[User talk:Lear 21|talk]]) 13:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
533755 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533754 +++$+++ 533754 +++$+++ 2009-03-29 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.238357460E09 +++$+++ You think I should start a discussion on all of those articles? At least for [[Germany]], [[Portugal]] and [[Slovenia]] there is a consensus against that image. If you prefer, I can remove the image from the other articles as well and state the reason at the talkpages. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : You think I should start a discussion on all of those articles? At least for [[Germany]], [[Portugal]] and [[Slovenia]] there is a consensus against that image. If you prefer, I can remove the image from the other articles as well and state the reason at the talkpages. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

533756 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-29 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.238379900E09 +++$+++ Do you think [[Cowen nude portraits|this]] would be appropriate for or worth proposing at [[Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page\/In The News|ITN\/AFD]]? It's been a massive news story all week but I'm not sure how well it is recognised internationally. If it is unknown it may seem a little unbelievable, especially at the top of the Main Page on AFD... --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ Do you think [[Cowen nude portraits|this]] would be appropriate for or worth proposing at [[Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/In The News|ITN/AFD]]? It's been a massive news story all week but I'm not sure how well it is recognised internationally. If it is unknown it may seem a little unbelievable, especially at the top of the Main Page on AFD... --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 19:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
533757 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533756 +++$+++ 533756 +++$+++ 2009-03-29 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.238380800E09 +++$+++ I think it may be quite amusing, if we manage to write it in non-offensive tone. Otherwise, that's the first time I've heard of this incident. The article is updated so you can put it into the good proposals section. --''' +++$+++ : I think it may be quite amusing, if we manage to write it in non-offensive tone. Otherwise, that's the first time I've heard of this incident. The article is updated so you can put it into the good proposals section. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
533758 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533756 +++$+++ 533757 +++$+++ 2009-03-29 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.238389620E09 +++$+++ Done. --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ :: Done. --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 22:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
533759 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533756 +++$+++ 533758 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.238397480E09 +++$+++ I've created [[Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page\/In The News\/1 April 2009|a sort of sample design]] to give a vague indication of what ITN might look like on 1 April 2009. --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ :::I've created [[Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/In The News/1 April 2009|a sort of sample design]] to give a vague indication of what ITN might look like on 1 April 2009. --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 00:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
533760 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533756 +++$+++ 533759 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 06:48:00 +++$+++ 1.238420880E09 +++$+++ Lovely! The first item is brilliant! The rest may need some polishing but yes, that's a great setup. --''' +++$+++ :::: Lovely! The first item is brilliant! The rest may need some polishing but yes, that's a great setup. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 06:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

569557 +++$+++ Retro machine +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569557 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-07 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.168238760E09 +++$+++ Looks like you contacted me around Dec. 31st. I've been busy with the Holidays and work. Yes I would like to be adopted. Not sure what that means yet. There is a lot to read here about this stuff. My main interests is portable video gaming systems. I own 22 different ones. I do have a general interest in video game systems, retro stuff being my first love.  +++$+++ Looks like you contacted me around Dec. 31st. I've been busy with the Holidays and work. Yes I would like to be adopted. Not sure what that means yet. There is a lot to read here about this stuff. My main interests is portable video gaming systems. I own 22 different ones. I do have a general interest in video game systems, retro stuff being my first love. [[User:Retro machine|Retro machine]] 22:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
569558 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569557 +++$+++ 569557 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.168239180E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for getting in to contact with me! I would recommend looking to see if there is a [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject Council\/Directory|Wikiproject]] about your interests.  There are a lot of videogame articles here, so there are probably other editors out there with similar interests and experiences to your own.  Let me know if you have any questions or encounter problems and I will do my best to help you.  Don't be afraid to ask questions, part of my job is to help you out so that you can help Wikipedia! Regards,  +++$+++ :OK, thanks for getting in to contact with me! I would recommend looking to see if there is a [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory|Wikiproject]] about your interests.  There are a lot of videogame articles here, so there are probably other editors out there with similar interests and experiences to your own.  Let me know if you have any questions or encounter problems and I will do my best to help you.  Don't be afraid to ask questions, part of my job is to help you out so that you can help Wikipedia! Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

9472 +++$+++ Benjwong +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9472 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-09 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.178712180E09 +++$+++ The pictures for [[Emperor Bing of Song]] and [[Emperor Duanzong of Song]] may be reversed.  I have a book here that shows the pictures and they are opposite of Bing and Duanzong.   +++$+++ The pictures for [[Emperor Bing of Song]] and [[Emperor Duanzong of Song]] may be reversed.  I have a book here that shows the pictures and they are opposite of Bing and Duanzong.  [[User:Benjwong|Benjwong]] 05:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
9473 +++$+++ Benjwong +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9472 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-10 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.178793960E09 +++$+++ I was hoping you have some opinions about it?  Maybe?   +++$+++ ::I was hoping you have some opinions about it?  Maybe?  [[User:Benjwong|Benjwong]] 03:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
9474 +++$+++ Benjwong +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9472 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-11 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.178941200E09 +++$+++ Some good news.  Your image is correct. There was actually a mistake in the book after doing more research.  Glad I didn't change anything.  +++$+++ :::Some good news.  Your image is correct. There was actually a mistake in the book after doing more research.  Glad I didn't change anything. [[User:Benjwong|Benjwong]] 20:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

533761 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-30 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.238413320E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --''' +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --'''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082567">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T♦</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|<span style="color:#FFBF00">Nominate!</span>]]</sup> 04:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
533762 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533761 +++$+++ 533761 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.238458980E09 +++$+++ What's the exact title of the article, I can't find it... --''' +++$+++ : What's the exact title of the article, I can't find it... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
533763 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533761 +++$+++ 533761 +++$+++ 2009-03-31 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.238535060E09 +++$+++ Hi. That was a prod deletion. Since you object, I will restore it and send it to AfD to get a consensus. You may want to leave a comment there, as well. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. That was a prod deletion. Since you object, I will restore it and send it to AfD to get a consensus. You may want to leave a comment there, as well. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

271618 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-11 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.265894640E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Mattisse, I don't think I've seen that particular tool before. It looks useful. <font color=\"purple\"> +++$+++ Thanks, Mattisse, I don't think I've seen that particular tool before. It looks useful. <font color="purple">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">[[User talk:SlimVirgin|TALK]]</font> <font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|contribs]]</font></sup></small> 05:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271619 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271618 +++$+++ 271618 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.265946420E09 +++$+++ According to SandyGeorgia[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates&diff=343241460&oldid=343240001], both tools are in the Featured article toolbox. I only see one though.   \u2014 +++$+++ :According to SandyGeorgia[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates&diff=343241460&oldid=343240001], both tools are in the Featured article toolbox. I only see one though.   —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271620 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271618 +++$+++ 271618 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.265960400E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I have raised these points [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Alerts here]. Whether or not to continue with the plan is your choice and I'll respect it. It is probably not a bad idea because it does seem like mentorship is not working. For one thing, the threat of 'advisors' is easily applied to any comment you make. And, I must admit that I personally am more interested in heading things off (at the pass, so to speak) even when I'm not convinced that you've done something egregious. That is probably not the right thing to do because it just exacerbates the problem. Still, I'd think about it for a couple of days if I were you because the road back at arb is long and dreary. -- +++$+++ :Mattisse, I have raised these points [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Alerts here]. Whether or not to continue with the plan is your choice and I'll respect it. It is probably not a bad idea because it does seem like mentorship is not working. For one thing, the threat of 'advisors' is easily applied to any comment you make. And, I must admit that I personally am more interested in heading things off (at the pass, so to speak) even when I'm not convinced that you've done something egregious. That is probably not the right thing to do because it just exacerbates the problem. Still, I'd think about it for a couple of days if I were you because the road back at arb is long and dreary. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 23:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271621 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271618 +++$+++ 271620 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.265960880E09 +++$+++ I would be willing to continue the plan if the plan is followed. However, currently it is being used to harass and abuse me. The way it is now a few editors can repeatedly harass me through the plan because they dislike or disagree with my opinion. I am being held to a higher standard than other editors and punished if I err in situations where others are not punished or even warned for the same or worse behavior. I do not believe that was the intention of arbcom, that my behavior must be saintly. They expressed more of a rehabilitative than the punitive approach that has resulted. The plan has not been followed. \u2014 +++$+++ ::I would be willing to continue the plan if the plan is followed. However, currently it is being used to harass and abuse me. The way it is now a few editors can repeatedly harass me through the plan because they dislike or disagree with my opinion. I am being held to a higher standard than other editors and punished if I err in situations where others are not punished or even warned for the same or worse behavior. I do not believe that was the intention of arbcom, that my behavior must be saintly. They expressed more of a rehabilitative than the punitive approach that has resulted. The plan has not been followed. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271622 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271618 +++$+++ 271621 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.265961900E09 +++$+++ I see all the discussion about the [[Wife swapping]] article. I did not know that it was Malleus' article when I made the comment. Further, are my comments worth blocks without warnings or discussion. I think rather too much is being made of this issue because the article belonged to Malleus and because he attacked me for commenting. The other article mentioned was [[Traumatic insemination]] which also can be seen as rather brutal toward females, and therefore perhaps not appropriate for an April Fools joke. So crucify me for the comments. However, whoever did that article did not come after me for the remark.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::I see all the discussion about the [[Wife swapping]] article. I did not know that it was Malleus' article when I made the comment. Further, are my comments worth blocks without warnings or discussion. I think rather too much is being made of this issue because the article belonged to Malleus and because he attacked me for commenting. The other article mentioned was [[Traumatic insemination]] which also can be seen as rather brutal toward females, and therefore perhaps not appropriate for an April Fools joke. So crucify me for the comments. However, whoever did that article did not come after me for the remark.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:05, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
271623 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271618 +++$+++ 271622 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.265962560E09 +++$+++ I am not the only person who has expressed the view that [[WP:OWN|ownership]] of articles is a problem. Some of the arbs said so in my arbitration. But because that offends some editors at FAC, I am not allowed to state the concern. Is it a blockable offense to bring up this topic?  Is it a forbidden topic? Can a few editors at FAC determine that it is abusive to bring up that topic, and the editor that does so should be harassed and punished?  That is for you all to decide. (And this is a world where some editors are allow to call others \"idiots\" and use obscenities freely. And joke about the status of women. I bet if the article were about selling Africans, it would not be considered for an April Fools joke TFA. Or maybe it would if such an article ever made it to FA status. ) \u2014 +++$+++ ::::I am not the only person who has expressed the view that [[WP:OWN|ownership]] of articles is a problem. Some of the arbs said so in my arbitration. But because that offends some editors at FAC, I am not allowed to state the concern. Is it a blockable offense to bring up this topic?  Is it a forbidden topic? Can a few editors at FAC determine that it is abusive to bring up that topic, and the editor that does so should be harassed and punished?  That is for you all to decide. (And this is a world where some editors are allow to call others "idiots" and use obscenities freely. And joke about the status of women. I bet if the article were about selling Africans, it would not be considered for an April Fools joke TFA. Or maybe it would if such an article ever made it to FA status. ) —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
271624 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271618 +++$+++ 271623 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.265964480E09 +++$+++ And apparently it is wrong to bring up the concept of page views. It is wrong to suggest that perhaps FA should consider readership to some degree. [[Wife swapping]] has few page views.[http:\/\/stats.grok.se\/en\/201002\/Wife_selling] Is it a blockable offense to bring that up? Is it a blockable offense to suggest that FAs not be {{t|orphan}}s? Now [[Wife swapping]] has two links, an improvement. Isn't interlinking a basic goal of the project?  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::And apparently it is wrong to bring up the concept of page views. It is wrong to suggest that perhaps FA should consider readership to some degree. [[Wife swapping]] has few page views.[http://stats.grok.se/en/201002/Wife_selling] Is it a blockable offense to bring that up? Is it a blockable offense to suggest that FAs not be {{t|orphan}}s? Now [[Wife swapping]] has two links, an improvement. Isn't interlinking a basic goal of the project?  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

533764 +++$+++ Mike Babic +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-31 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.238545440E09 +++$+++ I don't understand your reasoning. One sentence is saying that Serbia sees Kosovo as a province while the other is saying that the majority of the UN nations see kosovo as a province. Different subjects, different meanings. it's like saying \"Tom likes ice cream\" and \"majority of the world likes ice cream\", two very different messages.definitely not the same +++$+++ I don't understand your reasoning. One sentence is saying that Serbia sees Kosovo as a province while the other is saying that the majority of the UN nations see kosovo as a province. Different subjects, different meanings. it's like saying "Tom likes ice cream" and "majority of the world likes ice cream", two very different messages.definitely not the same[[User:Mike Babic|Mike Babic]] ([[User talk:Mike Babic|talk]]) 17:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
533765 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533764 +++$+++ 533764 +++$+++ 2009-03-31 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.238546280E09 +++$+++ Why do we discuss this here? The intro says ''considers it a United Nations-governed entity within its sovereign territory''... So there is no need to repeat that countries that do not recognize Kosovo do recognize it as a part of Serbia because this is more or less repeating the fact from above. --''' +++$+++ : Why do we discuss this here? The intro says ''considers it a United Nations-governed entity within its sovereign territory''... So there is no need to repeat that countries that do not recognize Kosovo do recognize it as a part of Serbia because this is more or less repeating the fact from above. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

558974 +++$+++  +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-15 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.179253620E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_LGBT_studies&diff=prev&oldid=131006213 That would do it, then.] \xb7\xb7[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=\" font-variant: small-caps\" >l<\/span>]][[ user talk:coelacan |acan]] 11:27, 15 May 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_LGBT_studies&diff=prev&oldid=131006213 That would do it, then.] ··[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=" font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>]][[ user talk:coelacan |acan]] 11:27, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
558975 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558974 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-15 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.179253740E09 +++$+++ Right, I'll leave messages on each of the candidate's pages. Do you mind updating [[Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies\/Coordinator]]? <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Right, I'll leave messages on each of the candidate's pages. Do you mind updating [[Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Coordinator]]? <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 11:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
558976 +++$+++  +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558974 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-15 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.179253980E09 +++$+++ I was about to ask Satyr, \"you know what you're supposed to be doing, yes?\" Because I'm a little unclear on the duties and all. I will note what I can, and they can fill in the rest as they figure it out, I guess. \xb7\xb7[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=\" font-variant: small-caps\" >l<\/span>]][[ user talk:coelacan |acan]] 11:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :::I was about to ask Satyr, "you know what you're supposed to be doing, yes?" Because I'm a little unclear on the duties and all. I will note what I can, and they can fill in the rest as they figure it out, I guess. ··[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=" font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>]][[ user talk:coelacan |acan]] 11:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
558977 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558974 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-15 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.179254280E09 +++$+++ Fair point. I was more thinking of reflecting the fact that there are now 1+2 rather than just 1. I guess they'll be doing the same thing Dev is (I advocated we should just have coordinators, not a coordinator and some assistants). <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::Fair point. I was more thinking of reflecting the fact that there are now 1+2 rather than just 1. I guess they'll be doing the same thing Dev is (I advocated we should just have coordinators, not a coordinator and some assistants). <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 11:38, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

533766 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-01 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.238639820E09 +++$+++ Can we please add the Venezuelan beauty queen [http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/americas\/7976207.stm error of judgement]? It's updated and I've left a wording at ITN. --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ Can we please add the Venezuelan beauty queen [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7976207.stm error of judgement]? It's updated and I've left a wording at ITN. --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 19:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
533767 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533766 +++$+++ 533766 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.238643840E09 +++$+++ What, that was actually true???!!!??? Now, with a couple of hours left I don't know if we need another update actually... --''' +++$+++ : What, that was actually true???!!!??? Now, with a couple of hours left I don't know if we need another update actually... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
533768 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533766 +++$+++ 533767 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.238645580E09 +++$+++ Uh, yes. It's been everywhere and features on [http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/uk_news\/magazine\/7976288.stm this list]. At the very least we can verify it with numerous sources. [http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/science\/nature\/7974995.stm This] too would be great if you could get anyone to do it. --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ ::Uh, yes. It's been everywhere and features on [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7976288.stm this list]. At the very least we can verify it with numerous sources. [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7974995.stm This] too would be great if you could get anyone to do it. --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 21:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

271625 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-11 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.265961060E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
271626 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271625 +++$+++ 271625 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.265964780E09 +++$+++ (correction) I see FAC editor [[User:Karanacs]] is sharing the load, bring up the Malleus article thing. Strange for a project that dislikes the [[WP:OWN|ownership]] concept, the complaint is concerned with the objections of [[Wife selling]]'s owner.  \u2014 +++$+++ :(correction) I see FAC editor [[User:Karanacs]] is sharing the load, bring up the Malleus article thing. Strange for a project that dislikes the [[WP:OWN|ownership]] concept, the complaint is concerned with the objections of [[Wife selling]]'s owner.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

524058 +++$+++ Lighthead +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524058 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-04 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.186238940E09 +++$+++ -- You know what that essay gave me idea that whenever I feel like it I can write an essay...Just a stupid thought.  +++$+++ -- You know what that essay gave me idea that whenever I feel like it I can write an essay...Just a stupid thought. [[User:Lighthead|þ]] 07:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
524059 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524058 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.186248900E09 +++$+++ The important thing for Flickr is that they have to change their license to CC-BY (attribution) or CC-BY-SA (share-alike). Non-commercial or no modification or \"only for use on Wikipedia\" don't work for us. Good luck. -- +++$+++ :: The important thing for Flickr is that they have to change their license to CC-BY (attribution) or CC-BY-SA (share-alike). Non-commercial or no modification or "only for use on Wikipedia" don't work for us. Good luck. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 10:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

569559 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-07 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.168240500E09 +++$+++ Hi aeropagitica, can you please explain why his\/her username is inappropriate? <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ Hi aeropagitica, can you please explain why his/her username is inappropriate? <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 23:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
569560 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569559 +++$+++ 569559 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.168241400E09 +++$+++ The username is very close to [[:User:Persian Poet Gal|Persian Poet Gal]], as reported on [[:WP:AIV]].  It is a softblock, so the user can register a new identity, if required.  +++$+++ :The username is very close to [[:User:Persian Poet Gal|Persian Poet Gal]], as reported on [[:WP:AIV]].  It is a softblock, so the user can register a new identity, if required. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
569561 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569559 +++$+++ 569560 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.168339080E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks. <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ ::OK, thanks. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 02:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

271628 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-12 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.266041160E09 +++$+++ You remain under conduct probation until advised otherwise. If you do not remove [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Mattisse\/Monitoring&curid=25459940&diff=343616317&oldid=343609764 this post] commenting negatively on another editor, you will be blocked. Thanks, '' +++$+++ You remain under conduct probation until advised otherwise. If you do not remove [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Monitoring&curid=25459940&diff=343616317&oldid=343609764 this post] commenting negatively on another editor, you will be blocked. Thanks, ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 22:06, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
271629 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271628 +++$+++ 271628 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.266041520E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I agree with geometryguy. Your options are fairly straightforward at this point. If you believe that it is important that your views on moni3 or SandyGeorgia or other editors be aired, and you are entitled to that belief, then you need to take all this back to arbcom because otherwise you're violating your conduct probation (plus, it is wrong to make charges against other editors without giving them the right venue to respond). If you wish to continue with the plan, then this sort of negative commentary must stop. -- +++$+++ :Mattisse, I agree with geometryguy. Your options are fairly straightforward at this point. If you believe that it is important that your views on moni3 or SandyGeorgia or other editors be aired, and you are entitled to that belief, then you need to take all this back to arbcom because otherwise you're violating your conduct probation (plus, it is wrong to make charges against other editors without giving them the right venue to respond). If you wish to continue with the plan, then this sort of negative commentary must stop. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 22:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
271630 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271628 +++$+++ 271629 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.266042600E09 +++$+++ OK. I have removed my posts. I realize my opinions and feeling are irrelevant. I have no say. I will edit not more. The process has achieved its purpose. I cannot believe that this is what the arbcom meant. But I see that I am powerless.  I am gone as desired. \u2014 +++$+++ ::OK. I have removed my posts. I realize my opinions and feeling are irrelevant. I have no say. I will edit not more. The process has achieved its purpose. I cannot believe that this is what the arbcom meant. But I see that I am powerless.  I am gone as desired. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

533773 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-03 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.238791200E09 +++$+++ Do the users who nominated the items for the AFD Main Page receive one of those \"thank you for creating\" tags on their talk pages? I got one for a DYK and was just wondering if I qualified for one of them for [[Brian Cowen nude portraits controversy|this]]? --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ Do the users who nominated the items for the AFD Main Page receive one of those "thank you for creating" tags on their talk pages? I got one for a DYK and was just wondering if I qualified for one of them for [[Brian Cowen nude portraits controversy|this]]? --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 13:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
533774 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533773 +++$+++ 533773 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.238793720E09 +++$+++ I guess you can credit one yourself ;-) It was on ITN after all... --''' +++$+++ : I guess you can credit one yourself ;-) It was on ITN after all... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
533775 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533773 +++$+++ 533774 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.238819100E09 +++$+++ On my ''own'' talk page? Hmmm... that seems inappropriate... --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ :: On my ''own'' talk page? Hmmm... that seems inappropriate... --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 21:25, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

271631 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271631 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-12 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.266046740E09 +++$+++ The tail does not wag the dog. If you continue to dictate to your advisors how they should enforce your conduct probation you will be blocked. '' +++$+++ The tail does not wag the dog. If you continue to dictate to your advisors how they should enforce your conduct probation you will be blocked. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
271632 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271631 +++$+++ 271631 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.266047040E09 +++$+++ I will be blocked for quoting my plan? How can that be?  I do not understand.   \u2014 +++$+++ :I will be blocked for quoting my plan? How can that be?  I do not understand.   —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
271633 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271631 +++$+++ 271632 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.266047880E09 +++$+++ You are not only quoting your plan, you are being disruptive and trying to make a point. Disengage. Clearly you are reconsidering abandoning your plan, so take some time to think about it. Please reread my comments on Monitoring talk. If, after some thought, you still disagree with any issue, explain there precisely what you disagree with. Nothing in your plan requires anything of your advisors beyond a willingness to help you, which is rapidly diminishing in my case. Stop testing my patience. I will simply walk away. '' +++$+++ :: You are not only quoting your plan, you are being disruptive and trying to make a point. Disengage. Clearly you are reconsidering abandoning your plan, so take some time to think about it. Please reread my comments on Monitoring talk. If, after some thought, you still disagree with any issue, explain there precisely what you disagree with. Nothing in your plan requires anything of your advisors beyond a willingness to help you, which is rapidly diminishing in my case. Stop testing my patience. I will simply walk away. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
271634 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271631 +++$+++ 271633 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.266048660E09 +++$+++ Thank you for removing those posts.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=343634653&oldid=343633864] That is the sort of thing I have to endure repeatedly. This is the first time a mentor\/adviser has helped me in this situation. \u2014 +++$+++ :::Thank you for removing those posts.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=343634653&oldid=343633864] That is the sort of thing I have to endure repeatedly. This is the first time a mentor/adviser has helped me in this situation. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
271635 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271631 +++$+++ 271634 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.266049620E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. I doubt it is the first time, but anyway, this is your talk page: you can remove posts here yourself, and you have evidently done so on several occasions. If you return to the Plan, you can contact advisors when someone posts on your talk page. You can also remove their comment instead of replying. If you don't deal with a sitation well, advisors may even remove your own posts from your talk page to avoid escalation. I hope you can handle that. '' +++$+++ ::::You are welcome. I doubt it is the first time, but anyway, this is your talk page: you can remove posts here yourself, and you have evidently done so on several occasions. If you return to the Plan, you can contact advisors when someone posts on your talk page. You can also remove their comment instead of replying. If you don't deal with a sitation well, advisors may even remove your own posts from your talk page to avoid escalation. I hope you can handle that. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 00:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
271636 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271631 +++$+++ 271635 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.266049800E09 +++$+++ I never remove posts. The only time I have is yesterday and today as I tried to retire. But I see retiring is not possible while I am being threatened with blocks.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::I never remove posts. The only time I have is yesterday and today as I tried to retire. But I see retiring is not possible while I am being threatened with blocks.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:30, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
271637 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271631 +++$+++ 271636 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.266049860E09 +++$+++ Sorry to bust into this cozey little party, but the solution to this problem is quite clear. You stop posting lies. -- +++$+++ ::::::Sorry to bust into this cozey little party, but the solution to this problem is quite clear. You stop posting lies. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 00:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
271638 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271631 +++$+++ 271637 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.266050100E09 +++$+++ Please stop your aggressive and intimidating posts on my page. You are harassing me. Please do not post on my page again.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::::Please stop your aggressive and intimidating posts on my page. You are harassing me. Please do not post on my page again.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

533777 +++$+++ Tintin1107 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-11 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.239480420E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:In_the_news_section_on_the_Main_Page\/Candidates&diff=prev&oldid=283168226 Clicked rollback by mistake]  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:In_the_news_section_on_the_Main_Page/Candidates&diff=prev&oldid=283168226 Clicked rollback by mistake] [[User_talk:Tintin1107|Tintin]] 13:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
533778 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533777 +++$+++ 533777 +++$+++ 2009-04-11 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.239493320E09 +++$+++ I thought so :-) No problem. --''' +++$+++ : I thought so :-) No problem. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

533779 +++$+++ Radjenef +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533779 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-14 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.239703500E09 +++$+++ You are obviously much more experienced in all matters wikipedia than I am, so I guess the right thing would be to ask you for some advice. If some new people -like me- have read the old name-conflict discussions and have genuinely new arguments with which they wish to attempt to change the consensus, is that possible or will all attempts be stopped because of what was discussed and decided six years ago? -- +++$+++ You are obviously much more experienced in all matters wikipedia than I am, so I guess the right thing would be to ask you for some advice. If some new people -like me- have read the old name-conflict discussions and have genuinely new arguments with which they wish to attempt to change the consensus, is that possible or will all attempts be stopped because of what was discussed and decided six years ago? --[[User:Radjenef|Radjenef]] ([[User talk:Radjenef|talk]]) 03:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
533780 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533779 +++$+++ 533779 +++$+++ 2009-04-14 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.239720840E09 +++$+++ Hi. The consensus can change, of course. However, for this, new arguments need to be presented. The right thing to do is to discuss the issue on the appropriate talkpage and until the debate is constructive and civil, noone should not stop it just because there was some consensus 6 years ago. I closed the last debate because it was becoming unproductive and because it was clear that the new consensus will not be reached then. I hope this helps. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The consensus can change, of course. However, for this, new arguments need to be presented. The right thing to do is to discuss the issue on the appropriate talkpage and until the debate is constructive and civil, noone should not stop it just because there was some consensus 6 years ago. I closed the last debate because it was becoming unproductive and because it was clear that the new consensus will not be reached then. I hope this helps. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
533781 +++$+++ Radjenef +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533779 +++$+++ 533780 +++$+++ 2009-04-14 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.239735360E09 +++$+++ Yes, this genuinely helps, thank you! I am a little bit confused by your use of a double negative in the phrase \"noone should not stop it\", but I take it you meant to say that noone should stop it if it is constructive and civil (correct me if I'm wrong!) Alright, all that remains now is to start a constructive and civil discussion (probably a first in this article) and see where it leads. -- +++$+++ :: Yes, this genuinely helps, thank you! I am a little bit confused by your use of a double negative in the phrase "noone should not stop it", but I take it you meant to say that noone should stop it if it is constructive and civil (correct me if I'm wrong!) Alright, all that remains now is to start a constructive and civil discussion (probably a first in this article) and see where it leads. --[[User:Radjenef|Radjenef]] ([[User talk:Radjenef|talk]]) 11:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
533782 +++$+++ Radjenef +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533779 +++$+++ 533780 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.240428360E09 +++$+++ Hello again. I am writing to you to ask your opinion and advice since you've already been involved in this article. The article was recently renamed without prior announcement or discussion from \"Republic of Macedonia\" to \"Macedonia\" by a wikipedia administrator. This goes against the whole rationale of maintaining what has been the result of a \"six year consensus\". Does this mean that the \"consensus\" no longer exists and that \u039a\u0395\u039a\u03a1\u03a9\u03a8 can re-open his old poll? -- +++$+++ :: Hello again. I am writing to you to ask your opinion and advice since you've already been involved in this article. The article was recently renamed without prior announcement or discussion from "Republic of Macedonia" to "Macedonia" by a wikipedia administrator. This goes against the whole rationale of maintaining what has been the result of a "six year consensus". Does this mean that the "consensus" no longer exists and that ΚΕΚΡΩΨ can re-open his old poll? --[[User:Radjenef|Radjenef]] ([[User talk:Radjenef|talk]]) 12:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
533783 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533779 +++$+++ 533782 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.240433820E09 +++$+++ Hi. Sorry, I am staying out of this topic this time since I will be unable to follow the whole discussion. Since the debate is already taking place, I suggest you join and present your opinion there. --''' +++$+++ ::: Hi. Sorry, I am staying out of this topic this time since I will be unable to follow the whole discussion. Since the debate is already taking place, I suggest you join and present your opinion there. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

549989 +++$+++ W.marsh +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 549989 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-03 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.151994540E09 +++$+++ If his account has been hijacked, all the more reason for it to be blocked (he wouldn't be able to log into it anyway). See also my reply on [[WT:RFA]]. -- +++$+++ If his account has been hijacked, all the more reason for it to be blocked (he wouldn't be able to log into it anyway). See also my reply on [[WT:RFA]]. --[[User:W.marsh|W.marsh]] 23:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
549990 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 549989 +++$+++ 549989 +++$+++ 2006-07-04 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.152057960E09 +++$+++ The guy said \"feel free to post (as in, drop a note) here if some help is needed\". No, I don't understand either what the guy wanted to say with that. :-( Maybe it was a message for HRE. -- +++$+++ : The guy said "feel free to post (as in, drop a note) here if some help is needed". No, I don't understand either what the guy wanted to say with that. :-( Maybe it was a message for HRE. --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 17:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

271639 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-13 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.266050700E09 +++$+++ If I may make a suggestion, why don't you continue this conversation on the [[Wikipedia Review]] discussion forum ( http:\/\/www.wikipediareview.com ). Malleus is a member there, Mattisse, and contributors are free to speak their mind there without fear of being blocked for violating AGF, being incivil etc. --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ If I may make a suggestion, why don't you continue this conversation on the [[Wikipedia Review]] discussion forum ( http://www.wikipediareview.com ). Malleus is a member there, Mattisse, and contributors are free to speak their mind there without fear of being blocked for violating AGF, being incivil etc. --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|JN]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 00:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
271640 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271639 +++$+++ 271639 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.266051480E09 +++$+++ No thanks. I have nothing to say at [[Wikipedia Review]] and do not wish to join in. I don't even know how to do so. I don't want to become one of those that offer endless opinions there. I don't admire that sort of thing at all.  I would rather have no contact with such eitors. To me it is navel gazing. \u2014 +++$+++ :No thanks. I have nothing to say at [[Wikipedia Review]] and do not wish to join in. I don't even know how to do so. I don't want to become one of those that offer endless opinions there. I don't admire that sort of thing at all.  I would rather have no contact with such eitors. To me it is navel gazing. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

271641 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271641 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-13 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.266056220E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, if I may make a suggestion. Take a week off and then decide what you want to do. You are obviously upset and that is never a good time to be saying things that cannot easily be unsaid. If, after a few days, you still want to dissolve the mentorship in place (which means the mentorship you have, not necessarily the one you want), then dissolve it and take your chances with arbcom. It is also not a bad idea to put some distance between this pressure point and a decision on whether to stay in or leave wikipedia. -- +++$+++ Mattisse, if I may make a suggestion. Take a week off and then decide what you want to do. You are obviously upset and that is never a good time to be saying things that cannot easily be unsaid. If, after a few days, you still want to dissolve the mentorship in place (which means the mentorship you have, not necessarily the one you want), then dissolve it and take your chances with arbcom. It is also not a bad idea to put some distance between this pressure point and a decision on whether to stay in or leave wikipedia. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 02:17, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
271642 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271641 +++$+++ 271641 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.266057480E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your suggestion but the situation is intolerable. I am being harrassed on multiple pages, my mentors\/advisers do not understand and do not seem familiar with my plan, and I have been threated with a block if I try to point out the provisions of the plan. As someone has pointed out to me, there is COI in their attempt to suppress my opinions of their implementation of the plan, as they do not want to admit they are have failed in their job and left me out to dry. Meanwhile, I have suffered abuse and punitive actions against me. My plan states that certain factors upset me, so my mentors\/advisers have done those very things to increase my frustration. Most of them have been missing in action. They are only periodically available. The situation cannot continue as is. It is not feasible. They are accepting input from those editors that bear lasting grudges against me as valid. I must do something or I certainly will be indefinitely blocked, as that is the mood of my mentors\/advisers. I really have not done the awful things that are being alleged. The mentors\/advisors only look superficially into the situations and accept the complainants evaluations.  I would stand a better change with the arbs who have no COI to defend. These mentors have not done their job and do not want to admit it. It would be s sign of good faith if they were willing to read the provisions of the plan and abide by them. But I am told by thejm that is unnecessary and they can do what they want. I believe that I can choose my mentors, and that mentors cannot be foisted on me, especially after they have fallen down on the job.   Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :I appreciate your suggestion but the situation is intolerable. I am being harrassed on multiple pages, my mentors/advisers do not understand and do not seem familiar with my plan, and I have been threated with a block if I try to point out the provisions of the plan. As someone has pointed out to me, there is COI in their attempt to suppress my opinions of their implementation of the plan, as they do not want to admit they are have failed in their job and left me out to dry. Meanwhile, I have suffered abuse and punitive actions against me. My plan states that certain factors upset me, so my mentors/advisers have done those very things to increase my frustration. Most of them have been missing in action. They are only periodically available. The situation cannot continue as is. It is not feasible. They are accepting input from those editors that bear lasting grudges against me as valid. I must do something or I certainly will be indefinitely blocked, as that is the mood of my mentors/advisers. I really have not done the awful things that are being alleged. The mentors/advisors only look superficially into the situations and accept the complainants evaluations.  I would stand a better change with the arbs who have no COI to defend. These mentors have not done their job and do not want to admit it. It would be s sign of good faith if they were willing to read the provisions of the plan and abide by them. But I am told by thejm that is unnecessary and they can do what they want. I believe that I can choose my mentors, and that mentors cannot be foisted on me, especially after they have fallen down on the job.   Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 02:38, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
271643 +++$+++ ChildofMidnight +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271641 +++$+++ 271642 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.266069240E09 +++$+++ I understand your frustration and I'm sorry about the way this matter has been handled. But people do make mistakes. I think if you can find a way to do some article work that would be great. That's why we're here after all. I'd be happy to try and help if I can and you want some entertainment. If I can't no worries. I respect the way you've held it together through this trial. I'm not sure why some of your mentors can't see things from your perspective, there's a saying about walking a mile in someone elses [[moccasin]]s, but anyway, just remember they're just trying in good faith. Good luck! I hope things will be brighter with the next dawn. :)  +++$+++ ::I understand your frustration and I'm sorry about the way this matter has been handled. But people do make mistakes. I think if you can find a way to do some article work that would be great. That's why we're here after all. I'd be happy to try and help if I can and you want some entertainment. If I can't no worries. I respect the way you've held it together through this trial. I'm not sure why some of your mentors can't see things from your perspective, there's a saying about walking a mile in someone elses [[moccasin]]s, but anyway, just remember they're just trying in good faith. Good luck! I hope things will be brighter with the next dawn. :) [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 05:54, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

533787 +++$+++ .IT +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-20 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.240239420E09 +++$+++ Why was my page deleted? I've cited several sources to show the notability of the subject, as was requested to recover the page. I fail to see why it is yet again deleted.  +++$+++ Why was my page deleted? I've cited several sources to show the notability of the subject, as was requested to recover the page. I fail to see why it is yet again deleted. [[User:.IT|.IT]] ([[User talk:.IT|talk]]) 07:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
533788 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533787 +++$+++ 533787 +++$+++ 2009-04-20 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.240260000E09 +++$+++ [[WP:CSD#G4]]. There was a deletion discussion about it and deletion was endorsed. If you want the article back, you need to go through that procedure again, not just recreating. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : [[WP:CSD#G4]]. There was a deletion discussion about it and deletion was endorsed. If you want the article back, you need to go through that procedure again, not just recreating. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
533789 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.240323660E09 +++$+++ I checked. The review at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\/Log\/2009 March 19]] says that the deletion was endorsed. The article was restored only for review purposes and deleted immediately when it was over. --''' +++$+++ ::: I checked. The review at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 19]] says that the deletion was endorsed. The article was restored only for review purposes and deleted immediately when it was over. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
533790 +++$+++ .IT +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.240415580E09 +++$+++ It got deleted after the review by [[User:Sandstein|Sandstein]], I contacted him through his talk page and he asked me to prove the notability, which I did. You can ask him, I don't see why the page keeps on getting deleted.  +++$+++ :::: It got deleted after the review by [[User:Sandstein|Sandstein]], I contacted him through his talk page and he asked me to prove the notability, which I did. You can ask him, I don't see why the page keeps on getting deleted. [[User:.IT|.IT]] ([[User talk:.IT|talk]]) 08:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
533791 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533787 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.240420380E09 +++$+++ If it is so, the next step is to fill in a new deletion review and then, if the result is positive, there will be no more complaints ;-) Greetings. --''' +++$+++ ::::: If it is so, the next step is to fill in a new deletion review and then, if the result is positive, there will be no more complaints ;-) Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:13, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

569562 +++$+++ Trueblood786 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569562 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-08 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.168246860E09 +++$+++ I disagree that {{IPVandal|75.15.203.99}} was blocked on a complaint of vandalism.  I have checked his posts and they do not fall under the term vandalism, therefore I request that the block should be removed and his edits be reposted.  +++$+++ I disagree that {{IPVandal|75.15.203.99}} was blocked on a complaint of vandalism.  I have checked his posts and they do not fall under the term vandalism, therefore I request that the block should be removed and his edits be reposted. [[User:Trueblood786|trueblood]] 01:01, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
569563 +++$+++ Aylahs +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569562 +++$+++ 569562 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.168251480E09 +++$+++ Other editors who have acted on the vandalism in question include [[:User:Eagle 101]] and [[:User:The Haunted Angel]] (both recipients of multiple barnstars including The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar) and [[User:Eliyahu S]]. Regards -- <i> +++$+++ :Other editors who have acted on the vandalism in question include [[:User:Eagle 101]] and [[:User:The Haunted Angel]] (both recipients of multiple barnstars including The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar) and [[User:Eliyahu S]]. Regards -- <i>[[User:Aylahs|Aylahs]] <sup>[[User talk:Aylahs|(talk)]]</sup></i> 02:18, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

271646 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271646 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-13 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.266053340E09 +++$+++ I think I will file a Clarification request. I am really taken aback that I can be blocked for quoting parts of my plan. Therefore, there is no way to enable the plan to be followed. That leaves me in limbo, since I cannot tolerate the abuse and punitiveness that has resulted from the plan as currently in action. I simply will not edit articles or contribute to the encyclopedia since the result is punishment. I prevented some punishment by no longer reviewing FACs and GANs. Since [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment\/M\xfcnchausen by Internet\/1]] I have done no GANs, thank god.   I am one of the reviews that has been driven off, and to think I used to do several reviews a week! There is really nothing for me to do here at Wikipedia anymore. I refuse to copy edit because of the ownership issue. So my leaving will be no loss.  \u2014 +++$+++ I think I will file a Clarification request. I am really taken aback that I can be blocked for quoting parts of my plan. Therefore, there is no way to enable the plan to be followed. That leaves me in limbo, since I cannot tolerate the abuse and punitiveness that has resulted from the plan as currently in action. I simply will not edit articles or contribute to the encyclopedia since the result is punishment. I prevented some punishment by no longer reviewing FACs and GANs. Since [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Münchausen by Internet/1]] I have done no GANs, thank god.   I am one of the reviews that has been driven off, and to think I used to do several reviews a week! There is really nothing for me to do here at Wikipedia anymore. I refuse to copy edit because of the ownership issue. So my leaving will be no loss.  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
271647 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271646 +++$+++ 271646 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.266055080E09 +++$+++ Yes, I will file a Clarification request. There is something wrong if I can be threatened with a block for quoting parts of my plan, since it is clear my mentors\/advisers are not familiar with it. How do you suggest I enable them to become familiar with it so that they will not violate the provisions if I am not allowed to bring relevant parts of it to their attention? Since that is the case, and I will be blocked if I do, I do not see any other alternative that to go back to Arbitration and seek clarification if the provisions of the plan are to be followed, or whether the mentors\/advisers can make up there own provisions, now that I am helpless and under their control. Have you another idea?  \u2014 +++$+++ :Yes, I will file a Clarification request. There is something wrong if I can be threatened with a block for quoting parts of my plan, since it is clear my mentors/advisers are not familiar with it. How do you suggest I enable them to become familiar with it so that they will not violate the provisions if I am not allowed to bring relevant parts of it to their attention? Since that is the case, and I will be blocked if I do, I do not see any other alternative that to go back to Arbitration and seek clarification if the provisions of the plan are to be followed, or whether the mentors/advisers can make up there own provisions, now that I am helpless and under their control. Have you another idea?  —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 01:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
271648 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271646 +++$+++ 271647 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.266131940E09 +++$+++ So, to clarify,  you will block me if I request my mentors\/advisers to follow my plan?[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=prev&oldid=343633211] \u2014 +++$+++ ::So, to clarify,  you will block me if I request my mentors/advisers to follow my plan?[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=prev&oldid=343633211] —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
271649 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271646 +++$+++ 271648 +++$+++ 2010-02-14 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.266163680E09 +++$+++ As you appear to have no confidence in your advisors, I am unable to give you any further advice at this time. SilkTork has withdrawn his offer of mentorship. If I see no sign in the next 24 hours that you are able to accept rather than deflect your failings, I may also withdraw my offer of mentorship permanently. Wikipedia does not revolve around you. Regards. '' +++$+++ ::* As you appear to have no confidence in your advisors, I am unable to give you any further advice at this time. SilkTork has withdrawn his offer of mentorship. If I see no sign in the next 24 hours that you are able to accept rather than deflect your failings, I may also withdraw my offer of mentorship permanently. Wikipedia does not revolve around you. Regards. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 08:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

533792 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-20 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.240261920E09 +++$+++ Would you consider reviewing the closure of this AfD in the light of [[:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of JamesBurns]] (checkuser results: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/JamesBurns\/Archive#Report_date_April_19_2009.2C_20:29_.28UTC.29|here]])? A relist with the sock comments struck or a pass at DRV would probably be a good idea. [[::User:Usrnme h8er|Usrnme h8er]]&nbsp;([[::User talk:Usrnme h8er|talk]]&nbsp;'''\xb7''' [[::Special:Contributions\/Usrnme h8er|contribs]]) 14:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ Would you consider reviewing the closure of this AfD in the light of [[:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of JamesBurns]] (checkuser results: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/JamesBurns/Archive#Report_date_April_19_2009.2C_20:29_.28UTC.29|here]])? A relist with the sock comments struck or a pass at DRV would probably be a good idea. [[::User:Usrnme h8er|Usrnme h8er]]&nbsp;([[::User talk:Usrnme h8er|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[::Special:Contributions/Usrnme h8er|contribs]]) 14:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
533793 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533792 +++$+++ 533792 +++$+++ 2009-04-20 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.240277160E09 +++$+++ Wow, that's a lot of socks! Still, I believe the deletion was justified in this case (it's the arguments that count, not number of votes). --''' +++$+++ * Wow, that's a lot of socks! Still, I believe the deletion was justified in this case (it's the arguments that count, not number of votes). --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:26, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
533794 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533792 +++$+++ 533793 +++$+++ 2009-04-20 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.240291860E09 +++$+++ It is isn't it? Really [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations\/Leanne\/AfDs affected|active]] too. In any case, another admin has gone ahead and relisted (as you've seen) so the point is moot. [[::User:Usrnme h8er|Usrnme h8er]]&nbsp;([[::User talk:Usrnme h8er|talk]]&nbsp;'''\xb7''' [[::Special:Contributions\/Usrnme h8er|contribs]]) 22:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ ** It is isn't it? Really [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leanne/AfDs affected|active]] too. In any case, another admin has gone ahead and relisted (as you've seen) so the point is moot. [[::User:Usrnme h8er|Usrnme h8er]]&nbsp;([[::User talk:Usrnme h8er|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[::Special:Contributions/Usrnme h8er|contribs]]) 22:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

271650 +++$+++ RegentsPark +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-14 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.266183180E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, it's up to you what you want to do next. You can go back to arb-com for a clarification, continue with the plan with the mentors you have in the way they implement mentorship, or walk away from wikipedia. What you're doing instead is venting publicly. In my opinion, there really is not much point in that. -- +++$+++ Mattisse, it's up to you what you want to do next. You can go back to arb-com for a clarification, continue with the plan with the mentors you have in the way they implement mentorship, or walk away from wikipedia. What you're doing instead is venting publicly. In my opinion, there really is not much point in that. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|sticks and stones]])</small> 13:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
271651 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271650 +++$+++ 271650 +++$+++ 2010-02-14 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.266186540E09 +++$+++ If I may suggest another alternative, Mattisse has indicated that she has ended the plan and dismissed her advisors.  Fine.  I suggest that the advisors concur in this and notify ArbCom.  I note that the ArbCom decision gives Mattisse the freedom to choose advisors, presumably she could unchoose them or choose others, if she wishes.  In the meantime, she is on conduct probation for another 10 months, which provides admins ample means of dealing with any questionable conduct.  What is difficult about that?  I should add that I urge Mattisse to be cautious, sanctions under conduct probation may be more harsh and more impersonal than she has known to date.  But it's a free wiki; give her what she wants.-- +++$+++ :If I may suggest another alternative, Mattisse has indicated that she has ended the plan and dismissed her advisors.  Fine.  I suggest that the advisors concur in this and notify ArbCom.  I note that the ArbCom decision gives Mattisse the freedom to choose advisors, presumably she could unchoose them or choose others, if she wishes.  In the meantime, she is on conduct probation for another 10 months, which provides admins ample means of dealing with any questionable conduct.  What is difficult about that?  I should add that I urge Mattisse to be cautious, sanctions under conduct probation may be more harsh and more impersonal than she has known to date.  But it's a free wiki; give her what she wants.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 14:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
271652 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271650 +++$+++ 271651 +++$+++ 2010-02-14 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.266203400E09 +++$+++ I would advise against abandoning the plan. This would require going back to arbcom, which will in itself be a painful and stressful process, I'd much rather avoid that. -- +++$+++ ::I would advise against abandoning the plan. This would require going back to arbcom, which will in itself be a painful and stressful process, I'd much rather avoid that. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]): 19:10, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
271653 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271650 +++$+++ 271652 +++$+++ 2010-02-14 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.266203820E09 +++$+++ OK, I will continue with the plan. If any of the advisers\/mentors wish to leave, of course they may. I am sorry and apologize for causing all this disturbance. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::OK, I will continue with the plan. If any of the advisers/mentors wish to leave, of course they may. I am sorry and apologize for causing all this disturbance. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

533795 +++$+++ Uncle G +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-22 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.240387080E09 +++$+++ Just to make sure:  You knew that [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Lac Motion]] was another such of these discussions when you closed it, didn't you?  +++$+++ Just to make sure:  You knew that [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lac Motion]] was another such of these discussions when you closed it, didn't you? [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 00:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
533796 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533795 +++$+++ 533795 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 07:17:00 +++$+++ 1.240409820E09 +++$+++ There were 2 socks and 4 real users in that one, I believe it was ok to delete it. Or you think I should wait for more opinions in this case? Greetings. --''' +++$+++ * There were 2 socks and 4 real users in that one, I believe it was ok to delete it. Or you think I should wait for more opinions in this case? Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
533797 +++$+++ Uncle G +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533795 +++$+++ 533796 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.240426200E09 +++$+++ I'm just making sure that you knew about the sockpuppetry (which didn't get struck out there as it has been in most of the other re-lists so far) and took it into account.   +++$+++ ** I'm just making sure that you knew about the sockpuppetry (which didn't get struck out there as it has been in most of the other re-lists so far) and took it into account.  [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 11:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

546796 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546796 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-19 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.250736000E09 +++$+++ and also the sentence \"The other side of her patriotism belonged to Egypt.\" in the source it says \"The other side of her patriotism was to her adopted country, Egypt\" Third section under \"Syrian or Egyptian?\" part http:\/\/www.utexas.edu\/utpress\/excerpts\/exzuhasp.html -- +++$+++ and also the sentence "The other side of her patriotism belonged to Egypt." in the source it says "The other side of her patriotism was to her adopted country, Egypt" Third section under "Syrian or Egyptian?" part http://www.utexas.edu/utpress/excerpts/exzuhasp.html --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 19:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
546797 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546796 +++$+++ 546796 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.250776380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for bringing these further examples to attention. I created a section on the article talk page [[Talk:Asmahan#Plagiarism issues]] where these can be listed. This will allow any other administrator from [[WP:CV]] to visit the page and see that there are other violations. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Thanks for bringing these further examples to attention. I created a section on the article talk page [[Talk:Asmahan#Plagiarism issues]] where these can be listed. This will allow any other administrator from [[WP:CV]] to visit the page and see that there are other violations. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 06:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
546798 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546796 +++$+++ 546797 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.250778420E09 +++$+++ So you will not do anything about this? like you did with the WW2 section? You want me to ad this text to the talkpage?-- +++$+++ ::So you will not do anything about this? like you did with the WW2 section? You want me to ad this text to the talkpage?--[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 07:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
546799 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546796 +++$+++ 546798 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.250778900E09 +++$+++ Yes, go ahead and add it to the talk page. I will deal with it as soon as I get a chance. At the moment, I am a bit swamped. (Note that we allow 7+1 days after notification for involved editors to rectify copyright violations before taking administrative action). <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Yes, go ahead and add it to the talk page. I will deal with it as soon as I get a chance. At the moment, I am a bit swamped. (Note that we allow 7+1 days after notification for involved editors to rectify copyright violations before taking administrative action). <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 07:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
546800 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546796 +++$+++ 546799 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 10:33:00 +++$+++ 1.250875980E09 +++$+++ I have changed some things as you said, replaced the consciousness sentence, I don't think the early life section (excluding emigration to Egypt) have any more plagiarism issues, please say if they do. I removed the \"awkward POV statement\" about her patriotism and removed the parenthetical insertion in the quote,  and some other fixes, but I still believe there are a lot of plagiarism in that section and also elsewhere: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Asmahan&diff=309225253&oldid=308686775 -- +++$+++ ::::I have changed some things as you said, replaced the consciousness sentence, I don't think the early life section (excluding emigration to Egypt) have any more plagiarism issues, please say if they do. I removed the "awkward POV statement" about her patriotism and removed the parenthetical insertion in the quote,  and some other fixes, but I still believe there are a lot of plagiarism in that section and also elsewhere: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asmahan&diff=309225253&oldid=308686775 --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 10:33, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546801 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546796 +++$+++ 546796 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.250742000E09 +++$+++ Your blanket deletions were not simply correcting a minor error, but resulted in the removal of portions  of text and references. If you have a disagreement with single items of text, please use the article talk page to discuss them with other editors. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Your blanket deletions were not simply correcting a minor error, but resulted in the removal of portions  of text and references. If you have a disagreement with single items of text, please use the article talk page to discuss them with other editors. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 21:20, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

533798 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-20 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.240275840E09 +++$+++ Could you please explain further why you redirected [[Richard Phillips (captain)]] to [[Maersk Alabama hijacking]].  Your edit summary says: ''\"redirect, per talk\"''.  There is no sign of a prior discussion of this merge at [[Talk:Maersk Alabama hijacking]].  Why doesn't your edit summary say where this discussion occurred?   +++$+++ Could you please explain further why you redirected [[Richard Phillips (captain)]] to [[Maersk Alabama hijacking]].  Your edit summary says: ''"redirect, per talk"''.  There is no sign of a prior discussion of this merge at [[Talk:Maersk Alabama hijacking]].  Why doesn't your edit summary say where this discussion occurred?  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 18:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
533799 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533798 +++$+++ 533798 +++$+++ 2009-04-20 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.240276920E09 +++$+++ There are two extensive debates with a clear consensus at the MV Maersk article and at the captain's article. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : There are two extensive debates with a clear consensus at the MV Maersk article and at the captain's article. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
533800 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533798 +++$+++ 533799 +++$+++ 2009-04-20 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.240280520E09 +++$+++ Someone pasted in a brief section on Phillips, that mentions his marraige.  It simply doesn't fit.  Frankly, the efforts put into merging the valid material from the Phillips article look like the work of a raw newbie, or worse.  +++$+++ ::Someone pasted in a brief section on Phillips, that mentions his marraige.  It simply doesn't fit.  Frankly, the efforts put into merging the valid material from the Phillips article look like the work of a raw newbie, or worse. [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 19:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
533801 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533798 +++$+++ 533800 +++$+++ 2009-04-20 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.240282680E09 +++$+++ There is a consensus that Phillips should not have a separate article. Maybe not everyone agreed, but it's really hard to have that in such cases. Maybe there should be a link on the talkpage to the discussion, please, add it the way you think it is appropriate. --''' +++$+++ ::: There is a consensus that Phillips should not have a separate article. Maybe not everyone agreed, but it's really hard to have that in such cases. Maybe there should be a link on the talkpage to the discussion, please, add it the way you think it is appropriate. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

394801 +++$+++ Fetchcomms +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ 394801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-29 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309395240E09 +++$+++ I realize you're quite busy, but I was wondering if you could do me a small favor. I'm going to be traveling until Sunday (but possibly Monday), so I won't have Internet access, and I was able to manage a quick expansion of [[Opposition to the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom]] for the Today's Document challenge of July 7. Unfortunately, I'm not nearly done, and I'm actually about to run out the door in an hour now, so I was just wondering if you could make sure the article is coherent, figure out a good DYK hook and nominate it, and get the Today's Document stuff for it taken care of (the image is in the article already), and keep an eye on the nomination\u2014I ''think'' it's been expanded 5x, but if it's a few hundred characters short, there are sources at [[User:Fetchcomms\/Opposition to the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom]]. If you don't have time, it would really be helpful if you could find someone else to nominate for DYK and watch this until I get back on July 3 (and hopefully not later). Innumerable thanks, <span style=\"font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;\">'''\/ +++$+++ I realize you're quite busy, but I was wondering if you could do me a small favor. I'm going to be traveling until Sunday (but possibly Monday), so I won't have Internet access, and I was able to manage a quick expansion of [[Opposition to the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom]] for the Today's Document challenge of July 7. Unfortunately, I'm not nearly done, and I'm actually about to run out the door in an hour now, so I was just wondering if you could make sure the article is coherent, figure out a good DYK hook and nominate it, and get the Today's Document stuff for it taken care of (the image is in the article already), and keep an eye on the nomination—I ''think'' it's been expanded 5x, but if it's a few hundred characters short, there are sources at [[User:Fetchcomms/Opposition to the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom]]. If you don't have time, it would really be helpful if you could find someone else to nominate for DYK and watch this until I get back on July 3 (and hopefully not later). Innumerable thanks, <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 17:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
394802 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ 394801 +++$+++ 394801 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.309432080E09 +++$+++ Ok I'll see what I can do in the 3 days I have; a good go-to editor for Hawaii is [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]], btw. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"#333\"> +++$+++ :Ok I'll see what I can do in the 3 days I have; a good go-to editor for Hawaii is [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]], btw. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#444">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 04:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
394803 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ 394801 +++$+++ 394802 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.309432140E09 +++$+++ Fetch: see [[User talk:Resident Mario#National Archives collaboration]]. Also, I marked UPHTS as stale, no one's really done anything there in ages. :\/ <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"#333\"> +++$+++ ::Fetch: see [[User talk:Resident Mario#National Archives collaboration]]. Also, I marked UPHTS as stale, no one's really done anything there in ages. :/ <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#444">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 04:09, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
394804 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ 394801 +++$+++ 394803 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.309499100E09 +++$+++ Ok, I've done a little background work and set down the article as a DYK nom: [[T:TDYK#July 7, \"Today's document challenge\"]]. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"#333\"> +++$+++ :::Ok, I've done a little background work and set down the article as a DYK nom: [[T:TDYK#July 7, "Today's document challenge"]]. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#444">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 22:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
394805 +++$+++ Fetchcomms +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ 394801 +++$+++ 394804 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.309516680E09 +++$+++ My hotel has wifi but I'm stuck on an iPod for now, tyvm ResMar--I'll be back hopefully on July 3 so no worries there, it's before the July 7 date. Ta. <span style=\"font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;\">'''\/ +++$+++ ::::My hotel has wifi but I'm stuck on an iPod for now, tyvm ResMar--I'll be back hopefully on July 3 so no worries there, it's before the July 7 date. Ta. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 03:38, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
394806 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ 394801 +++$+++ 394805 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.309517220E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! =) <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"#333\"> +++$+++ :::::You're welcome! =) <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#444">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 03:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
394807 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ 394801 +++$+++ 394806 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.309551300E09 +++$+++ Awesome, great job you two! :-)  +++$+++ ::::::Awesome, great job you two! :-) [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 13:15, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
394808 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ 394801 +++$+++ 394807 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.309551720E09 +++$+++ Incidentally, I think you are supposed to list the nomination in the normal area for review, and then move it to the special occasion holding area only after it is approved.  +++$+++ :::::::Incidentally, I think you are supposed to list the nomination in the normal area for review, and then move it to the special occasion holding area only after it is approved. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 13:22, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
394809 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ 394801 +++$+++ 394808 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309650840E09 +++$+++ Gotcha, now I know. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"#333\"> +++$+++ ::::::::Gotcha, now I know. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#444">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 16:54, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

271656 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-20 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.266736680E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]]  Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia!  In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed{{#if:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change|, [[:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]],}} is on [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|article probation]]. {{#if:Wikipedia:General sanctions\/Climate change probation|A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at [[:Wikipedia:General sanctions\/Climate change probation]].|}}  {{#if:|{{{3}}}|Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a [[WP:TEMPLATE|templated message]].  Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits.  Thank you.''}}<!-- Template:uw-probation --> --  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]]  Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia!  In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed{{#if:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change|, [[:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]],}} is on [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|article probation]]. {{#if:Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation|A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at [[:Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation]].|}}  {{#if:|{{{3}}}|Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a [[WP:TEMPLATE|templated message]].  Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits.  Thank you.''}}<!-- Template:uw-probation --> -- [[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 23:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
271657 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271656 +++$+++ 271656 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.266736920E09 +++$+++ OK. I had no idea.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :OK. I had no idea.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
271658 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271656 +++$+++ 271657 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.266737280E09 +++$+++ It's nothing to worry about.  We just try to ensure that everybody is aware of the special circumstances. -- +++$+++ :: It's nothing to worry about.  We just try to ensure that everybody is aware of the special circumstances. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 23:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

569564 +++$+++ Krasniy +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-08 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.168266360E09 +++$+++ Also, any Wikipedia pages I should especially take a look at before I start this venture? \u2248 +++$+++ Also, any Wikipedia pages I should especially take a look at before I start this venture? ≈[[User:Krasniy|<span style="color: #800">Krasniy</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Krasniy|t]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Krasniy|c]]</sub> 06:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
569565 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569564 +++$+++ 569564 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.168308360E09 +++$+++ The structure of the article at the moment is fine, so you can follow that layout.  Follow the format described in [[:WP:CITE]] or [[:WP:FOOT]].  Take a look at the [[:Wikipedia:Citation templates|citation templates]] for examples. Harvard referencing seems to be quite good for books - I have used that before.  As for looking at Help pages to assist you, I would always start with [[:Wikipedia:Your first article]], [[:Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles]], [[:Wikipedia:The perfect article]] and [[:Wikipedia:Article development]] - the first two in particular.  Let me know if you need any help, I will do what I can! Regards,  +++$+++ :The structure of the article at the moment is fine, so you can follow that layout.  Follow the format described in [[:WP:CITE]] or [[:WP:FOOT]].  Take a look at the [[:Wikipedia:Citation templates|citation templates]] for examples. Harvard referencing seems to be quite good for books - I have used that before.  As for looking at Help pages to assist you, I would always start with [[:Wikipedia:Your first article]], [[:Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles]], [[:Wikipedia:The perfect article]] and [[:Wikipedia:Article development]] - the first two in particular.  Let me know if you need any help, I will do what I can! Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 18:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

533804 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533804 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-07 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.241687820E09 +++$+++ Your assistance is required as BorgQueen and myself have disagreed over an ITN concerning [[2009 Brazilian floods and mudslides|the natural disaster]] which Brazil is currently experiencing. Alas that means we have a stalemate due to a typical lack of interest. Please help by casting the deciding vote if you are in the vicinity. If you receive this message days or weeks from now it might be better to ignore it and look at the one above since I had completely forgotten I asked you about that. --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ Your assistance is required as BorgQueen and myself have disagreed over an ITN concerning [[2009 Brazilian floods and mudslides|the natural disaster]] which Brazil is currently experiencing. Alas that means we have a stalemate due to a typical lack of interest. Please help by casting the deciding vote if you are in the vicinity. If you receive this message days or weeks from now it might be better to ignore it and look at the one above since I had completely forgotten I asked you about that. --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 02:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
533805 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533804 +++$+++ 533804 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.241746260E09 +++$+++ The matter has now been resolved. Thank you. --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ :The matter has now been resolved. Thank you. --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 18:31, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

533806 +++$+++ Jfahrenkrog +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533806 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-07 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.241760780E09 +++$+++ I disagree with the deletion of my wikipedia article and unfortunately did not see it until just now. If it is a simple formating issue, I understand. Otherwise, all the information in the system was correct and all details in the entry were accurate and verifiable.  +++$+++ I disagree with the deletion of my wikipedia article and unfortunately did not see it until just now. If it is a simple formating issue, I understand. Otherwise, all the information in the system was correct and all details in the entry were accurate and verifiable. [[User:Jfahrenkrog|Jfahrenkrog]] ([[User talk:Jfahrenkrog|talk]]) 22:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
533807 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533806 +++$+++ 533806 +++$+++ 2009-05-08 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.241793180E09 +++$+++ Hi. That was a prod deletion. I have some issues with sourcing but since you contest the deletion, I'll restore the article. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. That was a prod deletion. I have some issues with sourcing but since you contest the deletion, I'll restore the article. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:33, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

533808 +++$+++ Wel51x +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533808 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-08 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.241828820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Wel51x|Wel51x]] ([[User talk:Wel51x|talk]]) 17:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
533809 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533808 +++$+++ 533808 +++$+++ 2009-05-08 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.241835840E09 +++$+++ Hi. I copied the content to your userpage. Remove it when you don't need it any more. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I copied the content to your userpage. Remove it when you don't need it any more. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

9522 +++$+++ Active Banana +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9522 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-30 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.275271080E09 +++$+++ Hello, thank you for adding interesting content to [[Top hat]] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Top_hat&action=historysubmit&diff=365040144&oldid=364025635].  Are you able to provide [[WP:RS|sources]] that will help the content meet our \"[[WP:V|verifiable]]\" standard?  +++$+++ Hello, thank you for adding interesting content to [[Top hat]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Top_hat&action=historysubmit&diff=365040144&oldid=364025635].  Are you able to provide [[WP:RS|sources]] that will help the content meet our "[[WP:V|verifiable]]" standard? [[User:Active Banana|Active Banana]] ([[User talk:Active Banana|talk]]) 18:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
9523 +++$+++ Active Banana +++$+++ CharlieHuang +++$+++ 9522 +++$+++ 9522 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.277757120E09 +++$+++ Facebook and e-bay by themselves are not reliable sources. You can access the content of a lot of reliable sources through books.google.com (except for books published by Icon Inc which is a [[WP:CIRCULAR|Wikipedia mirror]] or other [[WP:SELFPUB|self published books]] such as Authorpress) or news.google.com (the archives are acceptable, but not most of the blogs). Does that help answer your question?  +++$+++ :Facebook and e-bay by themselves are not reliable sources. You can access the content of a lot of reliable sources through books.google.com (except for books published by Icon Inc which is a [[WP:CIRCULAR|Wikipedia mirror]] or other [[WP:SELFPUB|self published books]] such as Authorpress) or news.google.com (the archives are acceptable, but not most of the blogs). Does that help answer your question? [[User:Active Banana|Active Banana]] ([[User talk:Active Banana|talk]]) 13:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

533811 +++$+++ VaneWimsey +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-17 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.242543660E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I think it deserves an article.  Thanks. +++$+++ Anyway, I think it deserves an article.  Thanks.[[User:VaneWimsey|VaneWimsey]] ([[User talk:VaneWimsey|talk]]) 00:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
533812 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533811 +++$+++ 533811 +++$+++ 2009-05-17 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.242603660E09 +++$+++ Hi, the article, when I deleted it, was really short and really asserted no notability apart for Jonas brothers. But this itself is probably not enough... Anyway, if you try to rewrite it and give some better argumentation, it may stand a chance. Check [[WP:BAND]] to see what are the notability criteria in this case. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi, the article, when I deleted it, was really short and really asserted no notability apart for Jonas brothers. But this itself is probably not enough... Anyway, if you try to rewrite it and give some better argumentation, it may stand a chance. Check [[WP:BAND]] to see what are the notability criteria in this case. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

569566 +++$+++ Rougeblossom +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-08 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.168320900E09 +++$+++ Where can I find information about uploading pictures that I have taken and licensing issues that might come from it? Also, how do you reply to my messages and leave a copy on my own talk page? Thanks again,  +++$+++ Where can I find information about uploading pictures that I have taken and licensing issues that might come from it? Also, how do you reply to my messages and leave a copy on my own talk page? Thanks again, [[User:Rougeblossom|Rougeblossom]] 21:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
569567 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569566 +++$+++ 569566 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.168324920E09 +++$+++ The best place to look for information about images on Wikipedia is [[:Wikipedia:Uploading images]].  I would also think about uploading to [[:Wikipedia:Uploading_images#Multiproject_upload|Wikicommons]] rather than to Wikipedia, as this allows the images that you take to be shared amongst the WikiMedia group without the bother of multiple uploads.  [[:Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|Image copyright tags advice]] contains information for image creators such as yourself.  Lastly, to have this correspondence appear on both of our respective Talk pages, I simply copy-and-paste your enquiry and my response back on to your Talk page when I have finished. I prefer to format it as a script, that is - if you start a dialogue then your sections are fully left-justified; my sections are always indented by one space.  If someone else joins in then they are indented twice.  This way, I can instantly see which person has responded to a particular point without the bother of looking for their sig.  Other people have their own methods of organising correspondence - you are free to find a style that suits you! Regards,  +++$+++ :The best place to look for information about images on Wikipedia is [[:Wikipedia:Uploading images]].  I would also think about uploading to [[:Wikipedia:Uploading_images#Multiproject_upload|Wikicommons]] rather than to Wikipedia, as this allows the images that you take to be shared amongst the WikiMedia group without the bother of multiple uploads.  [[:Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|Image copyright tags advice]] contains information for image creators such as yourself.  Lastly, to have this correspondence appear on both of our respective Talk pages, I simply copy-and-paste your enquiry and my response back on to your Talk page when I have finished. I prefer to format it as a script, that is - if you start a dialogue then your sections are fully left-justified; my sections are always indented by one space.  If someone else joins in then they are indented twice.  This way, I can instantly see which person has responded to a particular point without the bother of looking for their sig.  Other people have their own methods of organising correspondence - you are free to find a style that suits you! Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

271672 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-26 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.153937040E09 +++$+++ blanking reverted, consider [[WP:RFD]] - <b> +++$+++ blanking reverted, consider [[WP:RFD]] - <b>[[User:Crzrussian/Userpage|CrazyRussian]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|talk]]/[[Special:Emailuser/Crzrussian|email]]</small> 11:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
271673 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271672 +++$+++ 271672 +++$+++ 2006-07-26 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.153961460E09 +++$+++ consider [[WP:RFD]]. See you. - <b> +++$+++ :consider [[WP:RFD]]. See you. - <b>[[User:Crzrussian/Userpage|CrazyRussian]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|talk]]/[[Special:Emailuser/Crzrussian|email]]</small> 17:51, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

9530 +++$+++ Knownalias +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9530 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-24 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.300993200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for saving that \"Kent\" summary; I was multi-tabbing with ''Nikita'' when I did it, and must have thought I'd already unlocked the hidden summary, as ''Nikita'' was doing the same thing with it (got ''that'' one right, at least).  +++$+++ Thanks for saving that "Kent" summary; I was multi-tabbing with ''Nikita'' when I did it, and must have thought I'd already unlocked the hidden summary, as ''Nikita'' was doing the same thing with it (got ''that'' one right, at least). [[User:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Kristen ITC"; color:#23297A'>KnownAlias</span>]][[User talk:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Segoe script"; color:#614051'><small>  contact</small></span>]] 12:00, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
9531 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9530 +++$+++ 9530 +++$+++ 2011-03-24 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.300993380E09 +++$+++ No worries. Just doing my part.  +++$+++ :No worries. Just doing my part. [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08#top|talk]]) 12:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

533819 +++$+++ Neu Euro Kaiser +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-29 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.243585740E09 +++$+++ I am a new contributor to Wikipedia and I feel my article was deleted simply because some thaught it to be racist when it at no time cliamed to be so in any way or displayed any racist symbols. I personally feel it was delteted because it was about a extremely new group that wanted to establish its own \"White-Majority\" country. The first claimed it didn't have enough information, but I tried to explain that more info was comming before two weeks from yesterday passed. And then after reading the comments in the deletion nomination I am convincent that it was deleted because it was simply aboout a Pro-White cause. If you feel that I am wrong or misunderstanding please let me know and I'll leave it alone.-- +++$+++ I am a new contributor to Wikipedia and I feel my article was deleted simply because some thaught it to be racist when it at no time cliamed to be so in any way or displayed any racist symbols. I personally feel it was delteted because it was about a extremely new group that wanted to establish its own "White-Majority" country. The first claimed it didn't have enough information, but I tried to explain that more info was comming before two weeks from yesterday passed. And then after reading the comments in the deletion nomination I am convincent that it was deleted because it was simply aboout a Pro-White cause. If you feel that I am wrong or misunderstanding please let me know and I'll leave it alone.--[[User:Neu Euro Kaiser|Neu Euro Kaiser]] ([[User talk:Neu Euro Kaiser|talk]]) 01:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
533820 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533819 +++$+++ 533819 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.243642680E09 +++$+++ Hi. We're talking about Empire of New Europe, right? The reason it was deleted is that it does not comply with the notability guidelines on Wikipedia, [[WP:N]], not because of any pro-cause. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. We're talking about Empire of New Europe, right? The reason it was deleted is that it does not comply with the notability guidelines on Wikipedia, [[WP:N]], not because of any pro-cause. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

9533 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9533 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-13 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.302685500E09 +++$+++ Please don't violate MOS when editing featured content.  Using the hash mark is unacceptable on Wikipedia, even in column headers, as most recently proven in the proceedings on [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/Huskies of Honor\/archive1]] among hundreds of precedents at FAC and FLC, as well as style guidelines I could dig up.  +++$+++ Please don't violate MOS when editing featured content.  Using the hash mark is unacceptable on Wikipedia, even in column headers, as most recently proven in the proceedings on [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Huskies of Honor/archive1]] among hundreds of precedents at FAC and FLC, as well as style guidelines I could dig up. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 02:05, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
9534 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9533 +++$+++ 9533 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.302687540E09 +++$+++ Not be be crass, but I really don't give a shit about MOS. I just follow what others do. I've been editing on Wikipedia for years and this is the first I've heard of it. There is no sense in having something as bulky and inefficient as \"season number\" in a column that features such little information. There isn't much room in these tables, so the way I see the less room those columns take up, the better. MOS is fine and all but I prefer a little [[WP:COMMONSENSE|common sense]].  +++$+++ :Not be be crass, but I really don't give a shit about MOS. I just follow what others do. I've been editing on Wikipedia for years and this is the first I've heard of it. There is no sense in having something as bulky and inefficient as "season number" in a column that features such little information. There isn't much room in these tables, so the way I see the less room those columns take up, the better. MOS is fine and all but I prefer a little [[WP:COMMONSENSE|common sense]]. [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08#top|talk]]) 02:39, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
9535 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9533 +++$+++ 9534 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.302689820E09 +++$+++ If that's your attitude towards MOS, please kindly don't make any style changes to pages ranked GA or higher.  Getting a page in line with the standards there is quite a bit of work, and ''remaining in compliance'' is a requirement for a page continuing to hold such status. And if you're going to apply common sense, remember that those symbols are not understood by- or used by- a large portion of the planet's population. Even in English, as you can see at [[Number sign]], the symbol has many different uses.  MOS is quite logical here, but there are ways to get that changed rather than degrading the standards of individual articles- it's been tried before and failed, but you're welcome to make another go at it.  Also, most articles here are substandard. Only 16,986 out of 3.6 million have passed a formal review- so copying what others do is usually a path that leads to error.   +++$+++ ::If that's your attitude towards MOS, please kindly don't make any style changes to pages ranked GA or higher.  Getting a page in line with the standards there is quite a bit of work, and ''remaining in compliance'' is a requirement for a page continuing to hold such status. And if you're going to apply common sense, remember that those symbols are not understood by- or used by- a large portion of the planet's population. Even in English, as you can see at [[Number sign]], the symbol has many different uses.  MOS is quite logical here, but there are ways to get that changed rather than degrading the standards of individual articles- it's been tried before and failed, but you're welcome to make another go at it.  Also, most articles here are substandard. Only 16,986 out of 3.6 million have passed a formal review- so copying what others do is usually a path that leads to error.  [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 03:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

271678 +++$+++ TrackerTV +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-29 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.154157420E09 +++$+++ Could you delete it? Congratulations on being an admin! - +++$+++ Could you delete it? Congratulations on being an admin! -[[User:TrackerTV/Links|TrackerTV]] 00:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
271679 +++$+++ Firsfron +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271678 +++$+++ 271678 +++$+++ 2006-07-29 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.154158980E09 +++$+++ [[User:King of Hearts]] just beat me to it. It's now been deleted. Thanks for the message, and the RfA vote. If there's anything I can do, let me know.--<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ :[[User:King of Hearts]] just beat me to it. It's now been deleted. Thanks for the message, and the RfA vote. If there's anything I can do, let me know.--<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Firsfron|Firsfron of Ronchester]]</font> 00:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

533823 +++$+++ Chiliad22 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533823 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-19 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.245442800E09 +++$+++ Hi, sorry to bug you but you've dealt with this article before. It's been recreated again with nothing new... still not even an assertion of importance. Can you look into it? I think the best solution might be protecting against recreation, or creating a protected redirect. -- +++$+++ Hi, sorry to bug you but you've dealt with this article before. It's been recreated again with nothing new... still not even an assertion of importance. Can you look into it? I think the best solution might be protecting against recreation, or creating a protected redirect. --[[User:Chiliad22|Chiliad22]] ([[User talk:Chiliad22|talk]]) 13:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
533824 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533823 +++$+++ 533823 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.245446940E09 +++$+++ Reverted back to a redirect and protected. This should do the job... Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Reverted back to a redirect and protected. This should do the job... Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
533825 +++$+++ Chiliad22 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533823 +++$+++ 533824 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.245449520E09 +++$+++ Thank you! -- +++$+++ :: Thank you! --[[User:Chiliad22|Chiliad22]] ([[User talk:Chiliad22|talk]]) 15:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

569568 +++$+++ SERSeanCrane +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-08 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.168326240E09 +++$+++ Adoption: Sounds good. I've been working on some random articles...I'll try to narrow an interest list at some point but for now I've been checking the recent changes area.  +++$+++ Adoption: Sounds good. I've been working on some random articles...I'll try to narrow an interest list at some point but for now I've been checking the recent changes area. [[User:SERSeanCrane|SERSeanCrane]] 23:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
569569 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569568 +++$+++ 569568 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.168326720E09 +++$+++ Great!  Let me know if you have any questions about editing or participating in Wikipedia.  There are many ways of contributing to this project and perhaps I can assist you in finding something that meets your needs and plays to your strengths as a researcher? Please don't feel afraid to ask a question.  I'll do my best to find an answer for you.  Half the fun of adopting people is discovering new information for myself with questions that I have not yet thought about asking! Regards,  +++$+++ :Great!  Let me know if you have any questions about editing or participating in Wikipedia.  There are many ways of contributing to this project and perhaps I can assist you in finding something that meets your needs and plays to your strengths as a researcher? Please don't feel afraid to ask a question.  I'll do my best to find an answer for you.  Half the fun of adopting people is discovering new information for myself with questions that I have not yet thought about asking! Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

9538 +++$+++ 98.234.170.224 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-27 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.303900920E09 +++$+++ Hi. Could you help me clean up the mess? What I'm trying to do is make [[List of Criminal Minds: Suspect Behavior episodes]] look like [[List of CSI: Miami episodes]] (for example), but for some reason, it isn't working for me. Can you help?[[Special:Contributions\/98.234.170.224|98.234.170.224]] ( +++$+++ Hi. Could you help me clean up the mess? What I'm trying to do is make [[List of Criminal Minds: Suspect Behavior episodes]] look like [[List of CSI: Miami episodes]] (for example), but for some reason, it isn't working for me. Can you help?[[Special:Contributions/98.234.170.224|98.234.170.224]] ([[User talk:98.234.170.224|talk]]) 03:42, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
9539 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9538 +++$+++ 9538 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.303900980E09 +++$+++ Done and done.  +++$+++ :Done and done. [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08#top|talk]]) 03:43, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

9541 +++$+++ NeoBatfreak +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-15 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.305508620E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just wonder if you have the complete list on songs played on the 2 hours series of ''Smallville''?-- +++$+++ Hi, I just wonder if you have the complete list on songs played on the 2 hours series of ''Smallville''?--[[User:NeoBatfreak|NeoBatfreak]] ([[User talk:NeoBatfreak|talk]]) 18:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
9542 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9541 +++$+++ 9541 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.305524940E09 +++$+++ No, I'm sorry but I do not. Try Google.  +++$+++ :No, I'm sorry but I do not. Try Google. [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08#top|talk]]) 22:49, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

533832 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-20 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.245560100E09 +++$+++ Hi, nice to see you have been at ITN on recent occasions. :-) BorgQueen is not interested (and neither is anyone else it would seem, at least judging by the way things have suddenly slowed down) so I would like your opinion on these for ITN. I know we've had Henry and his love of \"wild, wild women\" before but this time he has [http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/uk_news\/england\/sussex\/8108746.stm broken a world record] that has been in place since 2007 and I'm not sure Europe holds this record very often either. Also the world is [http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/europe\/8109698.stm getting hungrier] and the world is reporting this hunger - I left the links at ITN yesterday. What do you think of both of them? --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ Hi, nice to see you have been at ITN on recent occasions. :-) BorgQueen is not interested (and neither is anyone else it would seem, at least judging by the way things have suddenly slowed down) so I would like your opinion on these for ITN. I know we've had Henry and his love of "wild, wild women" before but this time he has [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/sussex/8108746.stm broken a world record] that has been in place since 2007 and I'm not sure Europe holds this record very often either. Also the world is [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8109698.stm getting hungrier] and the world is reporting this hunger - I left the links at ITN yesterday. What do you think of both of them? --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 21:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
533833 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533832 +++$+++ 533832 +++$+++ 2009-06-28 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.246223700E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted under the A7 CSD criteria since the article contained one sentence of prose. Curious, the deletion summary does not mention the reason, must have been a bug... Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted under the A7 CSD criteria since the article contained one sentence of prose. Curious, the deletion summary does not mention the reason, must have been a bug... Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
533834 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533832 +++$+++ 533832 +++$+++ 2009-06-28 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.246223700E09 +++$+++ Hi. Hm... I'll have to find some time to go through all the arguments slowly. But in short, if something is notable, someone is going to write an article sooner or later, so it's not only a work of PR team ;-) By the way, what is the exact title of the article? Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Hm... I'll have to find some time to go through all the arguments slowly. But in short, if something is notable, someone is going to write an article sooner or later, so it's not only a work of PR team ;-) By the way, what is the exact title of the article? Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
533835 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533832 +++$+++ 533832 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 08:35:00 +++$+++ 1.246462500E09 +++$+++ I don't have any issues with any other of the articles you started... but this one was an A7, sorry. --''' +++$+++ : I don't have any issues with any other of the articles you started... but this one was an A7, sorry. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

9545 +++$+++ NeoBatfreak +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9545 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-16 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.305554940E09 +++$+++ I'm thinking of creating a new article for Smallville listing all the songs played throughout the course of the series for fans to compile their own soundtrack, but there are alot.  Not sure I can keep track of them all, plus don't have much info.  Here's what I found: [http:\/\/www.tunefind.com\/show\/smallville\/season-1 tunefind.com]-- +++$+++ I'm thinking of creating a new article for Smallville listing all the songs played throughout the course of the series for fans to compile their own soundtrack, but there are alot.  Not sure I can keep track of them all, plus don't have much info.  Here's what I found: [http://www.tunefind.com/show/smallville/season-1 tunefind.com]--[[User:NeoBatfreak|NeoBatfreak]] ([[User talk:NeoBatfreak|talk]]) 07:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
9546 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9545 +++$+++ 9545 +++$+++ 2011-05-16 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.305557100E09 +++$+++ That seems fine just as long as you think there's sufficient [[WP:NMUSIC|notability]].  +++$+++ :That seems fine just as long as you think there's sufficient [[WP:NMUSIC|notability]]. [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08#top|talk]]) 07:45, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

9547 +++$+++ NeoBatfreak +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-16 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.305557640E09 +++$+++ You think ''Smallville'' will be back as a comic book series, the same way as ''Buffy the Vampire Slayer'', ''Angel'', ''Firefly'', and ''Charmed''?  That probably would have to bring at least some of the writers from the show to work on it, if they want to.  They reason that ''Buffy'' and ''Angel'' still contines after these two tv shows ended because Joss Whedon is a comic book nuts-- +++$+++ You think ''Smallville'' will be back as a comic book series, the same way as ''Buffy the Vampire Slayer'', ''Angel'', ''Firefly'', and ''Charmed''?  That probably would have to bring at least some of the writers from the show to work on it, if they want to.  They reason that ''Buffy'' and ''Angel'' still contines after these two tv shows ended because Joss Whedon is a comic book nuts--[[User:NeoBatfreak|NeoBatfreak]] ([[User talk:NeoBatfreak|talk]]) 07:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
9548 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9547 +++$+++ 9547 +++$+++ 2011-05-16 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.305558060E09 +++$+++ I really don't know. I don't actually even watch ''Smallville'', nor do I read comic books. I'm really not the right person to ask.  +++$+++ :I really don't know. I don't actually even watch ''Smallville'', nor do I read comic books. I'm really not the right person to ask. [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08#top|talk]]) 08:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

533836 +++$+++ Lasta +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533836 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-02 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.246563780E09 +++$+++ Hy Tone. I have one favour to ask, it is above my user rights. Can you please paste (if it is still available) [[NSC-Engine|deleted article]] to my [[User:Lasta\/article|work page]], where we can modify it and prepare it to fit Stirling engine article according discussion on the deletion page. Thanks -- +++$+++ Hy Tone. I have one favour to ask, it is above my user rights. Can you please paste (if it is still available) [[NSC-Engine|deleted article]] to my [[User:Lasta/article|work page]], where we can modify it and prepare it to fit Stirling engine article according discussion on the deletion page. Thanks --[[User:Lasta|<font color="Red">'''Las'''</font>]][[User talk:Lasta|<font color="Blue">'''ta'''</font>]] 12:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
533837 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533836 +++$+++ 533836 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.246574280E09 +++$+++ No problem. The last version is copied to your subpage. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : No problem. The last version is copied to your subpage. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:38, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
533838 +++$+++ Lasta +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533836 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-03 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.246628400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your quick response -- +++$+++ :::: Thanks for your quick response --[[User:Lasta|<font color="Red">'''Las'''</font>]][[User talk:Lasta|<font color="Blue">'''ta'''</font>]] 06:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

569570 +++$+++ Mrmoocow +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569570 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-09 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.168343700E09 +++$+++ How do I reference websites like [[:Spore (game)|this]], when in the template on the right it has 2007 and then a link?  +++$+++ How do I reference websites like [[:Spore (game)|this]], when in the template on the right it has 2007 and then a link? [[User:Mrmoocow|Mrmoocow]] 03:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
569571 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569570 +++$+++ 569570 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.168412220E09 +++$+++ Erm, I'm not too sure what you mean with your question!  Looking at the article, I see that it doesn't have references attached, so I would take a look at [[:WP:CITE]] and [[:WP:FOOT]] in the first instance, to see how to cite articles and place footnotes on to pages.  I would also look at [[:WP:RS]] to understand about reliable sources, as there are many websites that exist to speculate about video games and associated technology, so you don't want so place speculation on to an article instead of verifiable facts from reliable sources.  Let me know if I have misinterpreted your question and I'll try to answer more accurately if I have. Regards,  +++$+++ :Erm, I'm not too sure what you mean with your question!  Looking at the article, I see that it doesn't have references attached, so I would take a look at [[:WP:CITE]] and [[:WP:FOOT]] in the first instance, to see how to cite articles and place footnotes on to pages.  I would also look at [[:WP:RS]] to understand about reliable sources, as there are many websites that exist to speculate about video games and associated technology, so you don't want so place speculation on to an article instead of verifiable facts from reliable sources.  Let me know if I have misinterpreted your question and I'll try to answer more accurately if I have. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

271694 +++$+++ 71.223.40.167 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271694 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-03 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.157271420E09 +++$+++ Hi, I logged out to post this so It wouldn't go into my contributions.  It shouldn't be hard to figure out who I am.  Could you please nominate the Silver Town article for merger with Mt. Silver.  The guy who created the article has worked closely with me in the past and I don't want to offend him by doing it myself.  He has checked my contributions in the past, and he has checked what links to my page.   +++$+++ Hi, I logged out to post this so It wouldn't go into my contributions.  It shouldn't be hard to figure out who I am.  Could you please nominate the Silver Town article for merger with Mt. Silver.  The guy who created the article has worked closely with me in the past and I don't want to offend him by doing it myself.  He has checked my contributions in the past, and he has checked what links to my page.  [[User:71.223.40.167|71.223.40.167]] 01:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
271695 +++$+++ 71.223.40.167 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271694 +++$+++ 271694 +++$+++ 2006-09-03 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.157280660E09 +++$+++ Thank You.   +++$+++ :Thank You.  [[User:71.223.40.167|71.223.40.167]] 03:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

533839 +++$+++ EEMIV +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-07 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.246952220E09 +++$+++ I notice back in January, you removed as trivia the table of kills from [[Dexter (TV series)]]. It crept back in and I axed it again; surprise, another editor has restored it, naturally without responding to my talk-page explanation for the content's removal. Would you mind swinging past the talk page and weighing in on this? -- +++$+++ I notice back in January, you removed as trivia the table of kills from [[Dexter (TV series)]]. It crept back in and I axed it again; surprise, another editor has restored it, naturally without responding to my talk-page explanation for the content's removal. Would you mind swinging past the talk page and weighing in on this? --[[User:EEMIV|EEMIV]] ([[User talk:EEMIV|talk]]) 00:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
533840 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533839 +++$+++ 533839 +++$+++ 2009-07-07 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.246977960E09 +++$+++ I left my comments there and removed it again. Trivia and original research, no place in WP for that... Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : I left my comments there and removed it again. Trivia and original research, no place in WP for that... Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

9552 +++$+++ Serienfan2010 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311735840E09 +++$+++ I need your help. Can you tell him, that the broadcast order is the correct order. I didn't find a guideline which confirms that. Thanks --  +++$+++ I need your help. Can you tell him, that the broadcast order is the correct order. I didn't find a guideline which confirms that. Thanks -- [[User:Serienfan2010|Serienfan2010]] ([[User talk:Serienfan2010|talk]]) 20:04, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
9553 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9552 +++$+++ 9552 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311748200E09 +++$+++ I'm not exactly sure what you want me to do. Technically, he is correct. The production order is the intended order and considered the true continuity of the series. The rest of the ''Futurama'' seasons are ordered by production code, rather than bradcast order. I don't really see a reason not to do this for season six also.  +++$+++ :I'm not exactly sure what you want me to do. Technically, he is correct. The production order is the intended order and considered the true continuity of the series. The rest of the ''Futurama'' seasons are ordered by production code, rather than bradcast order. I don't really see a reason not to do this for season six also. [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08#top|talk]]) 23:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

533842 +++$+++ Unitanode +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533842 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-08 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.247120520E09 +++$+++ You deleted this article last year, and I was wondering if you'd mind restoring the contents at  +++$+++ You deleted this article last year, and I was wondering if you'd mind restoring the contents at [[User:Unitanode/Eric Frimpong]]? I'm interested in whatever was already done as I try to formulate an article on the wrongly-convicted person. [[User talk:Unitanode|<span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps;color:#63739F;font-weight:normal">Unitanode</span>]] 23:22, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
533843 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533842 +++$+++ 533842 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 12:56:00 +++$+++ 1.248378960E09 +++$+++ Hi. Seems the article has been recreated by now... Do you still need my help? Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Seems the article has been recreated by now... Do you still need my help? Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

9555 +++$+++ Ravenscroft32 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9555 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.312428840E09 +++$+++ Somebody's vandalized the viewing numbers on TB Season 4.  +++$+++ Somebody's vandalized the viewing numbers on TB Season 4. [[User:Ravenscroft32|Ravenscroft32]] ([[User talk:Ravenscroft32|talk]]) 20:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
9556 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9555 +++$+++ 9555 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.312433880E09 +++$+++ Best thing we can do is revert and see if he does it again. Leaving messages on IP's talk pages is rarely helpful, IMO, but if he persists that'll be the next step. After that an admin can be contacted and we can see about having him blocked for vandalism. We'll keep an eye on it, see if it happens again.  +++$+++ :Best thing we can do is revert and see if he does it again. Leaving messages on IP's talk pages is rarely helpful, IMO, but if he persists that'll be the next step. After that an admin can be contacted and we can see about having him blocked for vandalism. We'll keep an eye on it, see if it happens again. [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08#top|talk]]) 21:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

533844 +++$+++ OrangeDog +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533844 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-10 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.247214600E09 +++$+++ Could the article be undeleted? Would the following [http:\/\/scholar.google.co.uk\/scholar?q=Active%20Bat academic citations] and the three books in [http:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?q=Active+Bat this search] demonstrate acceptable notability? If necessary, just stub it and I'll work on it later. Thanks.  +++$+++ Could the article be undeleted? Would the following [http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=Active%20Bat academic citations] and the three books in [http://books.google.co.uk/books?q=Active+Bat this search] demonstrate acceptable notability? If necessary, just stub it and I'll work on it later. Thanks. [[User:OrangeDog|OrangeDog]]&nbsp;<small>([[User talk:OrangeDog|talk]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/OrangeDog|edits]])</small> 01:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
533845 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533844 +++$+++ 533844 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 12:56:00 +++$+++ 1.248378960E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process, so I recreated it upon your request. Good luck with improvements :-) --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process, so I recreated it upon your request. Good luck with improvements :-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

9557 +++$+++ Ihutchesson +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9557 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-06 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.312644600E09 +++$+++ You'll find out the reality soon enough. ([http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt1962775\/ *]) --  +++$+++ You'll find out the reality soon enough. ([http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1962775/ *]) -- [[User:Ihutchesson|Ihutchesson]] ([[User talk:Ihutchesson|talk]]) 08:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
9558 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ 9557 +++$+++ 9557 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.312645860E09 +++$+++ Since IMDb is user-submitted (meaning anyone can add anything they like) it is not a reliable source. If you can find one of those stating Southam directed the episode, it can be added. Or we can just wait until after the episode airs.  +++$+++ :Since IMDb is user-submitted (meaning anyone can add anything they like) it is not a reliable source. If you can find one of those stating Southam directed the episode, it can be added. Or we can just wait until after the episode airs. [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08#top|talk]]) 08:51, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

533846 +++$+++ Spaceman7Spiff +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-12 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.247401680E09 +++$+++ You closed the AfD as redirect, but the page is now back as an article, with two sources, one saying that there's no standard definition. Can you take a look? I didn't see anything on Deletion review for this either. - +++$+++ You closed the AfD as redirect, but the page is now back as an article, with two sources, one saying that there's no standard definition. Can you take a look? I didn't see anything on Deletion review for this either. -[[User:Spaceman7Spiff|SpacemanSpiff]] ([[User talk:Spaceman7Spiff|talk]]) 05:28, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
533847 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533846 +++$+++ 533846 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 12:56:00 +++$+++ 1.248378960E09 +++$+++ Redirect is back, apparently. --''' +++$+++ : Redirect is back, apparently. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

9559 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-16 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.276737540E09 +++$+++ I noticed your edits to triathlon articles (for which many thanks), and see from your user page that you're a triathlete from Kansas. Firstly, I wondered if you might like to join [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Triathlon|WikiProject Triathlon]] - we could use a few more hands to help clean up articles? Secondly, did you get to see Chrissie on Sunday 6\/6 on the \"yellow brick road\"? (just curious re. last question). -- +++$+++ I noticed your edits to triathlon articles (for which many thanks), and see from your user page that you're a triathlete from Kansas. Firstly, I wondered if you might like to join [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Triathlon|WikiProject Triathlon]] - we could use a few more hands to help clean up articles? Secondly, did you get to see Chrissie on Sunday 6/6 on the "yellow brick road"? (just curious re. last question). --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001|talk]]) 18:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
9560 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9559 +++$+++ 9559 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.276738140E09 +++$+++ Sure, I'm on board for the WikiProject Triathlon. And sadly, no I didn't get to see her (I only spied Andrew Yoder as he rode passed us after his race), though I possibly walked right passed her at the finish line as she was handing out finisher medals. I was doubled over in pain from leg cramps after I finished the race that I didn't have the presence of mind to look for her, congratulate her, etc. Nice work, by the way, on the [[Chrissie Wellington]] article. <i><font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Sure, I'm on board for the WikiProject Triathlon. And sadly, no I didn't get to see her (I only spied Andrew Yoder as he rode passed us after his race), though I possibly walked right passed her at the finish line as she was handing out finisher medals. I was doubled over in pain from leg cramps after I finished the race that I didn't have the presence of mind to look for her, congratulate her, etc. Nice work, by the way, on the [[Chrissie Wellington]] article. <i><font face="Verdana">[[User:Barkeep|<font color="Purple">'''Barkeep'''</font>]]</font></i><small><sup> [[User talk:Barkeep|<font color="Tan">'''''Chat'''''</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Barkeep|<font color="Tan">'''''$'''''</font>]]</sup></small> 18:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
9561 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9559 +++$+++ 9560 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.276739580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that. My intention is to focus on getting her article up to [[WP:GA]] status soon. Hope you're recovering well from the race by now. It seems that the run course was probably short, according to her blog and what some other people are saying, otherwise a time of 1:15:12 is pretty impressive for a chick! I guess it didn't feel quite so short for you [[Image:Smile.png|18px]]. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for that. My intention is to focus on getting her article up to [[WP:GA]] status soon. Hope you're recovering well from the race by now. It seems that the run course was probably short, according to her blog and what some other people are saying, otherwise a time of 1:15:12 is pretty impressive for a chick! I guess it didn't feel quite so short for you [[Image:Smile.png|18px]]. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001|talk]]) 18:53, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
9562 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9559 +++$+++ 9560 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.276739580E09 +++$+++ PS. no need for talkback, I've got your page on my watchlist. -- +++$+++ ::PS. no need for talkback, I've got your page on my watchlist. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001|talk]]) 18:53, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

533848 +++$+++ Jonel +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533848 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-16 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.247734860E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics \u2013 Women's road race\/archive2|Congrats!]] Excellent work. --  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Women's road race/archive2|Congrats!]] Excellent work. -- [[User:Jonel|Jonel]] ([[User talk:Jonel|Speak to me]]) 02:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
533849 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533848 +++$+++ 533848 +++$+++ 2009-07-30 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.248987600E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was tagged as A7, notability issues, and consequently deleted. If you think it can be improved, I can restore the content for you to have a look. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was tagged as A7, notability issues, and consequently deleted. If you think it can be improved, I can restore the content for you to have a look. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:00, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

533852 +++$+++ BigDom +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533852 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-09 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.249835340E09 +++$+++ Please can you recreate the article [[Alan Martin (footballer born 1989)]] you deleted, as he has made his professional league debut. Thanks,  +++$+++ Please can you recreate the article [[Alan Martin (footballer born 1989)]] you deleted, as he has made his professional league debut. Thanks, [[User:BigDom|<span style="color:#990033">Big</span>]][[User talk:BigDom|<span style="color:#3BB0FF"><small>Dom</small></span>]] 09:29, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
533853 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533852 +++$+++ 533852 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.249927200E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article is now restored but needs updates regarding the league. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article is now restored but needs updates regarding the league. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

394810 +++$+++ Ragettho +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ 394810 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-01 05:53:00 +++$+++ 1.309524780E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Hey Dominic! Again, I'd like to express my appreciation for your agreeing to answer my questions. If you ever need any press coverage for NARA or WMF events, I'd be happy to assist.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hey Dominic! Again, I'd like to express my appreciation for your agreeing to answer my questions. If you ever need any press coverage for NARA or WMF events, I'd be happy to assist. [[User:Ragettho|Ragettho]] ([[User talk:Ragettho|talk]]) 05:53, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
394811 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ 394810 +++$+++ 394810 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309551480E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I was happy to do it.  +++$+++ :Thanks, I was happy to do it. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 13:18, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

9566 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-09 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.281402360E09 +++$+++ Hi, I saw you added a date of birth to this article, where are you citing the date to?  +++$+++ Hi, I saw you added a date of birth to this article, where are you citing the date to? [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 18:06, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
9567 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9566 +++$+++ 9566 +++$+++ 2010-08-09 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.281402840E09 +++$+++ I first found the date from IMDB. There are also a few blogs out there that use the same date. The reference from the ''WSJ'' refers to her as 50-years-old (consistent with the date used in the info box). Additionally, a show she appeared on, ''Age of Love'', also lists her birthdate as 7\/16\/1960. <i><font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :I first found the date from IMDB. There are also a few blogs out there that use the same date. The reference from the ''WSJ'' refers to her as 50-years-old (consistent with the date used in the info box). Additionally, a show she appeared on, ''Age of Love'', also lists her birthdate as 7/16/1960. <i><font face="Verdana">[[User:Barkeep|<font color="Purple">'''Barkeep'''</font>]]</font></i><small><sup> [[User talk:Barkeep|<font color="Tan">'''''Chat'''''</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Barkeep|<font color="Tan">'''''$'''''</font>]]</sup></small> 18:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
9568 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9566 +++$+++ 9566 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.281478680E09 +++$+++ IMBD is not a reliable citation for any biographical detail. There are a few comments that she is 50 but the date is unsupported, a DOB requires quite a strong claim, where is this Age of Love claim, is that cited? [[Age_of_Love_(TV_series)]] I don't see a DOB there, have you got a link to that DOB claim?   +++$+++ :IMBD is not a reliable citation for any biographical detail. There are a few comments that she is 50 but the date is unsupported, a DOB requires quite a strong claim, where is this Age of Love claim, is that cited? [[Age_of_Love_(TV_series)]] I don't see a DOB there, have you got a link to that DOB claim?  [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 15:18, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
9569 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9566 +++$+++ 9568 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.281487260E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.nbc.com\/Age_of_Love\/bios\/bio_jodie.shtml Link] Considering the nature of the show and the publishing source the info should be considered reliable. Feel free to add it to the article if you wish. <i><font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::[http://www.nbc.com/Age_of_Love/bios/bio_jodie.shtml Link] Considering the nature of the show and the publishing source the info should be considered reliable. Feel free to add it to the article if you wish. <i><font face="Verdana">[[User:Barkeep|<font color="Purple">'''Barkeep'''</font>]]</font></i><small><sup> [[User talk:Barkeep|<font color="Tan">'''''Chat'''''</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Barkeep|<font color="Tan">'''''$'''''</font>]]</sup></small> 17:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
9570 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9566 +++$+++ 9569 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.281487800E09 +++$+++ Done, thank you.  +++$+++ :::Done, thank you. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 17:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

271713 +++$+++ Golbez +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-13 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.163418300E09 +++$+++ We don't delete users, and you seem perfectly able to edit. Was it an IP autoblock? -- +++$+++ We don't delete users, and you seem perfectly able to edit. Was it an IP autoblock? --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 03:45, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
271714 +++$+++ Golbez +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271713 +++$+++ 271713 +++$+++ 2006-11-13 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.163418540E09 +++$+++ The autoblock seems to have expired, let me know if it comes back; and I will archive my talk page when and how I please. -- +++$+++ :The autoblock seems to have expired, let me know if it comes back; and I will archive my talk page when and how I please. --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 03:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
271715 +++$+++ Golbez +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271713 +++$+++ 271714 +++$+++ 2006-11-13 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.163418840E09 +++$+++ Sorry for being rude myself, you're right, and I've archived. -- +++$+++ ::Sorry for being rude myself, you're right, and I've archived. --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 03:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

9571 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-20 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.282319580E09 +++$+++ P.S. Are you up for getting her through [[WP:DYK]]? Should be a lot easier with two of us working on it. -- +++$+++ P.S. Are you up for getting her through [[WP:DYK]]? Should be a lot easier with two of us working on it. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001|talk]]) 08:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
9572 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9571 +++$+++ 9571 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.282337220E09 +++$+++ I have not specific aspirations on getting the article through for DYK, but I welcome any attempt and collaboration for the article to reach that point. I'll continue to help improve the article where I can. There appears to be a good amount of information available online for her (particularly Spanish language) that could aid in expanding the article. <i><font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :I have not specific aspirations on getting the article through for DYK, but I welcome any attempt and collaboration for the article to reach that point. I'll continue to help improve the article where I can. There appears to be a good amount of information available online for her (particularly Spanish language) that could aid in expanding the article. <i><font face="Verdana">[[User:Barkeep|<font color="Purple">'''Barkeep'''</font>]]</font></i><small><sup> [[User talk:Barkeep|<font color="Tan">'''''Chat'''''</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Barkeep|<font color="Tan">'''''$'''''</font>]]</sup></small> 13:47, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

533862 +++$+++ Sarstarco +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533862 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-12 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.250134740E09 +++$+++ I am also the author of the text found on that site and want to use that same text for the article, minus the advertising aspects of it. How can I make this happen without getting deleted? How is this infringement if I am the author of both? Sorry for these novice questions. Thanks much.  +++$+++ I am also the author of the text found on that site and want to use that same text for the article, minus the advertising aspects of it. How can I make this happen without getting deleted? How is this infringement if I am the author of both? Sorry for these novice questions. Thanks much. [[User:Sarstarco|Sarstarco]] ([[User talk:Sarstarco|talk]]) 20:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
533863 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533862 +++$+++ 533862 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.250135040E09 +++$+++ Hi. In that case, this is not a problem, you just need to state that you are the author of the text from the website (how should anyone know that otherwise?). This is best done in the edit summary and on the talkpage of the article. Of course, you release the text under GFDL licence then, as all the content here. I hope this helps. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. In that case, this is not a problem, you just need to state that you are the author of the text from the website (how should anyone know that otherwise?). This is best done in the edit summary and on the talkpage of the article. Of course, you release the text under GFDL licence then, as all the content here. I hope this helps. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

271722 +++$+++ Dhett +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-10 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.165817520E09 +++$+++ I have no problems with those being used here. Are you looking for me to post them here on [[WT:TVS]]? If so, I can, but I publish them on R-I per the [[WP:NOR#Citing oneself|Citing Oneself]] policy.  +++$+++ I have no problems with those being used here. Are you looking for me to post them here on [[WT:TVS]]? If so, I can, but I publish them on R-I per the [[WP:NOR#Citing oneself|Citing Oneself]] policy. [[User:Dhett|dhett]] 22:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
271723 +++$+++ Dhett +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271722 +++$+++ 271722 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.165817880E09 +++$+++ No problem - I'll start publishing them here, too.  +++$+++ : No problem - I'll start publishing them here, too. [[User:Dhett|dhett]] 22:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

9580 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9580 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-11 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.307861580E09 +++$+++ ... if you're racing IM 70.3 Kansas tomorrow. And if not, well good luck anyway at whatever you're doing! It would be great if you get a chance to have a word with Chrissie and pass on my abject apologies for my failure to bring her article up to GA status (yet) - it now needs a lot of work to bring it up to date - but it will get done eventually [[Image:Smile.png|18px]]. I attended a talk she gave in London not long after her second Hawaii win, when very near the start she mentioned her Wikipedia article ([http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=L_tr8ELPbeg&feature=channel_page video here] - this was before she'd set up her own web site). Afterwards I said to her that I was the guy who'd written her Wikipedia article, and she replied, \"It's amazing, how did you get it so accurate?\" I mumbled something about everything being sourced, didn't get a chance to say much more, as there was a queue of people wanting to talk to her. -- +++$+++ ... if you're racing IM 70.3 Kansas tomorrow. And if not, well good luck anyway at whatever you're doing! It would be great if you get a chance to have a word with Chrissie and pass on my abject apologies for my failure to bring her article up to GA status (yet) - it now needs a lot of work to bring it up to date - but it will get done eventually [[Image:Smile.png|18px]]. I attended a talk she gave in London not long after her second Hawaii win, when very near the start she mentioned her Wikipedia article ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_tr8ELPbeg&feature=channel_page video here] - this was before she'd set up her own web site). Afterwards I said to her that I was the guy who'd written her Wikipedia article, and she replied, "It's amazing, how did you get it so accurate?" I mumbled something about everything being sourced, didn't get a chance to say much more, as there was a queue of people wanting to talk to her. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001|talk]]) 23:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
9581 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9580 +++$+++ 9580 +++$+++ 2011-06-14 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.308105780E09 +++$+++ Thanks. The race went well for me, plus I had the privilege of having Chrissie place my finishers medal around my neck (something I missed out on last year). Being out there at the venue it would've been nice to see her race, but I had my own race to take care of. I did get to see her exit from the water and transition through T1. Pretty awesome. Hours after the race I was walking through the event expo area and Chrissie reemerged for the upcoming awards ceremony. I had great opportunity to get a photo with her, but sadly I was without my camera. Pretty neat with video and the mention of her Wikipedia page. You do a great job on the page; hardly another triathlete biography out there that is comparable. <i><font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Thanks. The race went well for me, plus I had the privilege of having Chrissie place my finishers medal around my neck (something I missed out on last year). Being out there at the venue it would've been nice to see her race, but I had my own race to take care of. I did get to see her exit from the water and transition through T1. Pretty awesome. Hours after the race I was walking through the event expo area and Chrissie reemerged for the upcoming awards ceremony. I had great opportunity to get a photo with her, but sadly I was without my camera. Pretty neat with video and the mention of her Wikipedia page. You do a great job on the page; hardly another triathlete biography out there that is comparable. <i><font face="Verdana">[[User:Barkeep|<font color="Purple">'''Barkeep'''</font>]]</font></i><small><sup> [[User talk:Barkeep|<font color="Tan">'''''Chat'''''</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Barkeep|<font color="Tan">'''''$'''''</font>]]</sup></small> 19:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
9582 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9580 +++$+++ 9581 +++$+++ 2011-06-14 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.308110940E09 +++$+++ Sounds like it went a lot better than last year, hope you're recovering well. Actually, it was a lot easier to write her article back then than it is now. I really enjoy the detective work of finding out missing info, and was very curious how someone could come out of nowhere to win the World Champs, especially someone who was a former member of my running club (but she left it before I joined, so no COI). Nowadays it's the opposite problem of too much info, and that is much harder to deal with. -- +++$+++ ::Sounds like it went a lot better than last year, hope you're recovering well. Actually, it was a lot easier to write her article back then than it is now. I really enjoy the detective work of finding out missing info, and was very curious how someone could come out of nowhere to win the World Champs, especially someone who was a former member of my running club (but she left it before I joined, so no COI). Nowadays it's the opposite problem of too much info, and that is much harder to deal with. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001|talk]]) 21:09, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

271725 +++$+++ Dhett +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271725 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-22 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.166789700E09 +++$+++ I do take the protests quite seriously, however, and am starting to look for ways to improve the quality of my own writing, which I find lacking at times.  +++$+++ I do take the protests quite seriously, however, and am starting to look for ways to improve the quality of my own writing, which I find lacking at times. [[User:Dhett|dhett]] 04:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
271726 +++$+++ Dhett +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271725 +++$+++ 271725 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.167225540E09 +++$+++ Another bullet dodged. The more I encounter these deletion zealots, the more I'm assured that we'll never lack for people to serve on HOA boards anytime in the foreseeable future. ;-)  +++$+++ :Another bullet dodged. The more I encounter these deletion zealots, the more I'm assured that we'll never lack for people to serve on HOA boards anytime in the foreseeable future. ;-) [[User:Dhett|dhett]] 05:19, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

9583 +++$+++ Mzilikazi1939 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-20 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.308589740E09 +++$+++ Dear Barkeep, I'd like to thank you for responding so quickly to my appeal to upgrade the article. Can I bother you to take another look now that I and Annielogue have worked hard to widen its scope. (S\/he's been providing me with information so it's a co-operative effort). In view of the fable's enigmatic origin, investigation into which is still ongoing, it would be good if you could raise its importance level particularly.  +++$+++ Dear Barkeep, I'd like to thank you for responding so quickly to my appeal to upgrade the article. Can I bother you to take another look now that I and Annielogue have worked hard to widen its scope. (S/he's been providing me with information so it's a co-operative effort). In view of the fable's enigmatic origin, investigation into which is still ongoing, it would be good if you could raise its importance level particularly. [[User:Mzilikazi1939|Mzilikazi1939]] ([[User talk:Mzilikazi1939|talk]]) 10:09, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
9584 +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ Barkeep +++$+++ 9583 +++$+++ 9583 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.308603180E09 +++$+++ My only role in editing this article was to make sure it complied with Wikipedia's policies, in particular, [[WP:MOS|manual of style]]. I have no real knowledge of the article subject and where its importance lies within the realm of books\/stories\/etc. If you wish to gain the opinion that the article's importance should be changed I would discuss this with [[WP:WikiProject Novels]] on their [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels\/Short story task force|talk page]] as the article falls under their scope. Thanks. <i><font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :My only role in editing this article was to make sure it complied with Wikipedia's policies, in particular, [[WP:MOS|manual of style]]. I have no real knowledge of the article subject and where its importance lies within the realm of books/stories/etc. If you wish to gain the opinion that the article's importance should be changed I would discuss this with [[WP:WikiProject Novels]] on their [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels/Short story task force|talk page]] as the article falls under their scope. Thanks. <i><font face="Verdana">[[User:Barkeep|<font color="Purple">'''Barkeep'''</font>]]</font></i><small><sup> [[User talk:Barkeep|<font color="Tan">'''''Chat'''''</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Barkeep|<font color="Tan">'''''$'''''</font>]]</sup></small> 13:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
9585 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9583 +++$+++ 9583 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.294698300E09 +++$+++ Thanks, and the same to you. :-) A bit late, yes. :P ''''' +++$+++ :Thanks, and the same to you. :-) A bit late, yes. :P '''''[[User:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|DARTH SIDIOUS 2]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|Contact]])</sup> 14:25, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
9586 +++$+++ Demize +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9583 +++$+++ 9583 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.294216320E09 +++$+++ If you were not logged in, then somebody else in the school made the edit - schools generally don't have dedicated IPs for each computer. If you were logged in, then your account may have been compromised and I would recommend changing your password on it and confirming that the email on it is yours if you can still access it.  +++$+++ :If you were not logged in, then somebody else in the school made the edit - schools generally don't have dedicated IPs for each computer. If you were logged in, then your account may have been compromised and I would recommend changing your password on it and confirming that the email on it is yours if you can still access it. [[User:Demize|<span style="color:red">d</span>]][[User_Talk:Demize|<span style="color:green">m</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Demize|<span style="color:blue">z</span>]] 00:32, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

271728 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.168519320E09 +++$+++ Hi. Just so we're on the same page, you could ask for help at [[Wikipedia:Help desk]]. The article main space is \"...\" on Wikipedia, which any \"List of...\" is on. You can also add the {{tl|helpme}} tag on this talk page and someone will come to confirm this. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. Just so we're on the same page, you could ask for help at [[Wikipedia:Help desk]]. The article main space is "..." on Wikipedia, which any "List of..." is on. You can also add the {{tl|helpme}} tag on this talk page and someone will come to confirm this. Thanks. [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Xiner|email]]) 04:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
271729 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271728 +++$+++ 271728 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.168519500E09 +++$+++ For reference, [[List of Seinfeld episodes]].  +++$+++ :For reference, [[List of Seinfeld episodes]]. [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Xiner|email]]) 04:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

533873 +++$+++ Master of Puppets +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-13 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.250232720E09 +++$+++ I've got his tagline and everything ready to post, but, since we just posted the planet one, do you want to give it a bit of time? Or are you ok with me putting it up right now? Cheers,  +++$+++ I've got his tagline and everything ready to post, but, since we just posted the planet one, do you want to give it a bit of time? Or are you ok with me putting it up right now? Cheers, [[User:Master of Puppets|<span style="color:#7d7d7d;cursor:move;">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets]] - [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<sub style="color:#7d7d7d;cursor:help;">Call me MoP! :D]]</sub> 23:52, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
533874 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533873 +++$+++ 533873 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.250260320E09 +++$+++ There's no need to wait a certain time before adding new items. When it's ready, it can go up. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : There's no need to wait a certain time before adding new items. When it's ready, it can go up. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

533875 +++$+++ Alan_Liefting +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-14 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.250319300E09 +++$+++ Can you userfy the deleted [[Kiwis Against Seabed Mining]]. Cheers.  --  +++$+++ Can you userfy the deleted [[Kiwis Against Seabed Mining]]. Cheers.  -- [[User:Alan Liefting|Alan Liefting]] ([[User_talk:Alan_Liefting|talk]]) - 23:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
533876 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533875 +++$+++ 533875 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 10:12:00 +++$+++ 1.250356320E09 +++$+++ It's on your talkpaeg now. --''' +++$+++ : It's on your talkpaeg now. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:12, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
533877 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533875 +++$+++ 533875 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 10:12:00 +++$+++ 1.250356320E09 +++$+++ Sure, if you tell me what article you are interested in, I can provide you the content if you need it. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Sure, if you tell me what article you are interested in, I can provide you the content if you need it. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:12, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

9588 +++$+++ methecooldude +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9588 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-03 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.296721740E09 +++$+++ Hey DS2... as you can see I've expanded my WP plate per se with reviewer and helping out at [[WP:ABU|ABU]]. How are things going for you? - <tt> +++$+++ Hey DS2... as you can see I've expanded my WP plate per se with reviewer and helping out at [[WP:ABU|ABU]]. How are things going for you? - <tt>[[User:methecooldude|Rich<span style="color:Red;">(MTCD)</span>]]</tt><sup>[[User talk:methecooldude|Talk Page]]</sup> 00:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
9589 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9588 +++$+++ 9588 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.296843000E09 +++$+++ I've been on a long vacation for some time, and will be until the next summer, unfortunately. :( As you see, I'm a student, and doing some work for a while too, to get some extra cash. ;) As my userpage says, I still edit sometimes, when I have enough free time, but won't be such an active everyday editor as I was last year. I'm technically always on IRC, using a shell account, but otherwise my presence on IRC or in Wikipedia will be quite rare... Anyway, nice to see you have progressed and gained some rights. :-) ''''' +++$+++ :I've been on a long vacation for some time, and will be until the next summer, unfortunately. :( As you see, I'm a student, and doing some work for a while too, to get some extra cash. ;) As my userpage says, I still edit sometimes, when I have enough free time, but won't be such an active everyday editor as I was last year. I'm technically always on IRC, using a shell account, but otherwise my presence on IRC or in Wikipedia will be quite rare... Anyway, nice to see you have progressed and gained some rights. :-) '''''[[User:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|DARTH SIDIOUS 2]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|Contact]])</sup> 10:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
9590 +++$+++ methecooldude +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9588 +++$+++ 9589 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.296854400E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see, don't worry :) <tt> +++$+++ ::Ah, I see, don't worry :) <tt>[[User:methecooldude|Rich<span style="color:Red;">(MTCD)</span>]]</tt><sup>[[User talk:methecooldude|Talk Page]]</sup> 13:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

533878 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-15 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.250393040E09 +++$+++ Mr Gillani has a picture if you want. :D --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ Mr Gillani has a picture if you want. :D --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 20:24, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
533879 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533878 +++$+++ 533878 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.250393160E09 +++$+++ Nah, a picture of a train would be great but the prime minister just opened the route... We have two more items before we are in an urge for a new item. --''' +++$+++ : Nah, a picture of a train would be great but the prime minister just opened the route... We have two more items before we are in an urge for a new item. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
533880 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533878 +++$+++ 533879 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.250418300E09 +++$+++ Looks like it is on the Main Page now. :D --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ ::Looks like it is on the Main Page now. :D --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 03:25, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
533881 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533878 +++$+++ 533880 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.250435640E09 +++$+++ I don't mind. --''' +++$+++ ::: I don't mind. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

9591 +++$+++ Paulmcdonald +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-07 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.297145160E09 +++$+++ I am placing this notice on talk pages of users who have shown interest in the past, regardless of how they !voted in the discussion.  If you do participate, please mention that you were asked to participate in the discussion.-- +++$+++ I am placing this notice on talk pages of users who have shown interest in the past, regardless of how they !voted in the discussion.  If you do participate, please mention that you were asked to participate in the discussion.--[[User:Paulmcdonald|Paul McDonald]] ([[User talk:Paulmcdonald|talk]]) 22:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
9592 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9591 +++$+++ 9591 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.297393980E09 +++$+++ I had a look now, and voted. The other one seems to be already closed, sorry I didn't reply in time. As my userpage says, I'm pretty busy nowdays, and thus will not be checking my talk page every day. However, I can be reached via IRC faster, if quick reply is needed in future. :-) ''''' +++$+++ :I had a look now, and voted. The other one seems to be already closed, sorry I didn't reply in time. As my userpage says, I'm pretty busy nowdays, and thus will not be checking my talk page every day. However, I can be reached via IRC faster, if quick reply is needed in future. :-) '''''[[User:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|DARTH SIDIOUS 2]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|Contact]])</sup> 19:13, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
9593 +++$+++ Shirt58 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9591 +++$+++ 9591 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.298222460E09 +++$+++ Cancel that! -- +++$+++ : Cancel that! --[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 09:21, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
9594 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9591 +++$+++ 9593 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.298222940E09 +++$+++ On some pages here in the English Wikipedia, it was linked as [[Elegance In Black]], with upper case 'I'. Also, if you google it, you get many results with uppercase as well as lowercase. And this is not the Finnish Wikipedia, they don't essentially need to be the same. I'm anyway a little unsure which one to use, as I've seen both versions being used regularly. ''''' +++$+++ ::On some pages here in the English Wikipedia, it was linked as [[Elegance In Black]], with upper case 'I'. Also, if you google it, you get many results with uppercase as well as lowercase. And this is not the Finnish Wikipedia, they don't essentially need to be the same. I'm anyway a little unsure which one to use, as I've seen both versions being used regularly. '''''[[User:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|DARTH SIDIOUS 2]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|Contact]])</sup> 09:29, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
9595 +++$+++ Shirt58 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9591 +++$+++ 9594 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.298223900E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I saw that when I Googled it too.  No problem.  Thanks for the quick reply!  On the subject of Finnish metal, for a chuckle you might want to check out [[Hevisaurus]].-- +++$+++ :::Yeah, I saw that when I Googled it too.  No problem.  Thanks for the quick reply!  On the subject of Finnish metal, for a chuckle you might want to check out [[Hevisaurus]].--[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 09:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
9596 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9591 +++$+++ 9595 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.298224140E09 +++$+++ Heh, interesting. :D And I think I'll let Elegance In Black the way it is now, as it seems unclear how it should officially be. May someone else change in the future if necessary. ''''' +++$+++ ::::Heh, interesting. :D And I think I'll let Elegance In Black the way it is now, as it seems unclear how it should officially be. May someone else change in the future if necessary. '''''[[User:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|DARTH SIDIOUS 2]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|Contact]])</sup> 09:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

533882 +++$+++ Johnfos +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533882 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-15 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.250394120E09 +++$+++ Hi, Thank you for closing [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Health effects of wind power]] as \"delete\", but much of the material immediately re-appeared at [[Environmental effects of wind power#Health effects]] (see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Environmental_effects_of_wind_power&diff=next&oldid=308020897]) so the questionable content hasn't been deleted at all. Can we do something about this?  +++$+++ Hi, Thank you for closing [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Health effects of wind power]] as "delete", but much of the material immediately re-appeared at [[Environmental effects of wind power#Health effects]] (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Environmental_effects_of_wind_power&diff=next&oldid=308020897]) so the questionable content hasn't been deleted at all. Can we do something about this? [[User:Johnfos|Johnfos]] ([[User talk:Johnfos|talk]]) 20:42, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
533883 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533882 +++$+++ 533882 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.250394360E09 +++$+++ Sure. Now the debate moves to the talkpage - whether the content you mention is appropriate for the article or not. A deleted article already can be an indicator where the debate should head... However, some stuff may still be useful, it's to be decided. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Sure. Now the debate moves to the talkpage - whether the content you mention is appropriate for the article or not. A deleted article already can be an indicator where the debate should head... However, some stuff may still be useful, it's to be decided. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:46, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

263743 +++$+++ 24.126.193.239 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-16 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.155791700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:24.126.193.239|24.126.193.239]] 22:15, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
263744 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263743 +++$+++ 263743 +++$+++ 2006-08-17 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.155832140E09 +++$+++ Are you willing to leave the final copyediting to experienced Wikipedia editors? Wikipedia is not a promotional tool. In my experience, artists who are desperate to have an article are not notable, but I see that he does have albums listed at Amazon. Adjectives should be avoided. The final draft that I read was overly expressive. Also, I notice some legal threats on its talk page, which is please is against [[WP:LEGAL]] and coul dget you blocked. I'm sure that these threats contributed to the article's deletion. Perhaps you would like to propose a new article at [[User:The JPS\/Catman Cohen proposal]] and we can see if it satisifes our standards before moving it into mainspace?  +++$+++ :Are you willing to leave the final copyediting to experienced Wikipedia editors? Wikipedia is not a promotional tool. In my experience, artists who are desperate to have an article are not notable, but I see that he does have albums listed at Amazon. Adjectives should be avoided. The final draft that I read was overly expressive. Also, I notice some legal threats on its talk page, which is please is against [[WP:LEGAL]] and coul dget you blocked. I'm sure that these threats contributed to the article's deletion. Perhaps you would like to propose a new article at [[User:The JPS/Catman Cohen proposal]] and we can see if it satisifes our standards before moving it into mainspace? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
263745 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263743 +++$+++ 263744 +++$+++ 2006-08-17 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.155832320E09 +++$+++ P.S. My use of the word 'spam' may have been harsh, but copying your message to Cowman's page was unneccessary. A message saying a reply existed on mine would have been sufficient.  +++$+++ ::P.S. My use of the word 'spam' may have been harsh, but copying your message to Cowman's page was unneccessary. A message saying a reply existed on mine would have been sufficient. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:32, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

533884 +++$+++ Per aspera ad Astra +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-15 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.250397180E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone, thanks for helping to add the pages for the competing countries. If I might give you a piece of advice: start with the countries beginning with Z, because at those with I I'm now adding the athletes' names, so your basic info is then redundant. Cheers  +++$+++ Hi Tone, thanks for helping to add the pages for the competing countries. If I might give you a piece of advice: start with the countries beginning with Z, because at those with I I'm now adding the athletes' names, so your basic info is then redundant. Cheers [[User:Per aspera ad Astra|Per aspera ad Astra]] ([[User talk:Per aspera ad Astra|talk]]) 21:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
533885 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533884 +++$+++ 533884 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.250397240E09 +++$+++ Ok, I'll keep that in mind. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, I'll keep that in mind. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:34, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

9597 +++$+++ Joe Jarvis +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-07 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.299568080E09 +++$+++ Thank you for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Joe_Jarvis&diff=prev&oldid=417611633 reverting] the hate vandalism on my user page.  +++$+++ Thank you for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Joe_Jarvis&diff=prev&oldid=417611633 reverting] the hate vandalism on my user page. [[User:Joe Jarvis|Joe Jarvis]] ([[User talk:Joe Jarvis|talk]]) 23:08, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
9598 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9597 +++$+++ 9597 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.299810060E09 +++$+++ No problem, always happy to revert vandalism. :) ''''' +++$+++ :No problem, always happy to revert vandalism. :) '''''[[User:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|DARTH SIDIOUS 2]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|Contact]])</sup> 18:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
9599 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9597 +++$+++ 9597 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.300062060E09 +++$+++ An unconstructive edit from your IP has indeed been done ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Give_it_a_Name?diff=384192244 this one]), but it's propably dynamic IP or something, and thus you got the message even though you didn't do anything. Someone else had your IP earlier, and done that edit, so it's of course not your fault. :) ''''' +++$+++ :An unconstructive edit from your IP has indeed been done ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Give_it_a_Name?diff=384192244 this one]), but it's propably dynamic IP or something, and thus you got the message even though you didn't do anything. Someone else had your IP earlier, and done that edit, so it's of course not your fault. :) '''''[[User:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|DARTH SIDIOUS 2]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|Contact]])</sup> 17:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
9600 +++$+++ Jj98 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9597 +++$+++ 9597 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.300080480E09 +++$+++ Hi, Klein, would you mind if you discuss at [[WP:DRV]]? There is a deletion review of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conceptual Jungle]] listed at [[WP:DRV]] that you vote delete at [[WP:MFD]]. Please join the discussion [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\/Log\/2011 March 13#Wikipedia:WikiProject Conceptual Jungle|here]]. Thank for your time, regards, ''' +++$+++ :Hi, Klein, would you mind if you discuss at [[WP:DRV]]? There is a deletion review of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conceptual Jungle]] listed at [[WP:DRV]] that you vote delete at [[WP:MFD]]. Please join the discussion [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 March 13#Wikipedia:WikiProject Conceptual Jungle|here]]. Thank for your time, regards, '''[[User:Jj98|JJ98]] <small>([[User talk:Jj98|Talk]])</small>''' 22:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

533886 +++$+++ Ekaune +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533886 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-29 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.259494620E09 +++$+++ The article for the Mill Creek Town Center in Mill Creek, Washington was deleted last year due to lack of notability. The Town Center is easily the most visible and important part of Mill Creek, and I feel that if there is an article about Mill Creek (which there is), there should be an article about the Town Center. I'd like to rewrite the article if you're all right with that.  +++$+++ The article for the Mill Creek Town Center in Mill Creek, Washington was deleted last year due to lack of notability. The Town Center is easily the most visible and important part of Mill Creek, and I feel that if there is an article about Mill Creek (which there is), there should be an article about the Town Center. I'd like to rewrite the article if you're all right with that. [[User:Ekaune|Ekaune]] ([[User talk:Ekaune|talk]]) 03:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
533887 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533886 +++$+++ 533886 +++$+++ 2009-11-29 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.259518260E09 +++$+++ Sure, go ahead. But make sure you address the notability issues so that it does not get deleted again. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Sure, go ahead. But make sure you address the notability issues so that it does not get deleted again. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

613269 +++$+++ DannyMuse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-01 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.217641620E09 +++$+++ Given Dawkins' high profile in this controversy, it should be informative to watch and see how he currently uses the terms: Darwinism, evolution and natural-selection. Enjoy! -  +++$+++ Given Dawkins' high profile in this controversy, it should be informative to watch and see how he currently uses the terms: Darwinism, evolution and natural-selection. Enjoy! - [[User:DannyMuse|DannyMuse]] ([[User talk:DannyMuse|talk]]) 18:47, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
613270 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613269 +++$+++ 613269 +++$+++ 2008-08-01 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.217645940E09 +++$+++ Excellent, thanks for the heads-up. I'd probably have missed it as I'm rather allergic to adverts and didn't even realise that there are two Channel 4s now. Interestingly, the title now appears to be ''The Genius of Charles Darwin''. So that's the viddy set, something to look forward to. . .  +++$+++ :Excellent, thanks for the heads-up. I'd probably have missed it as I'm rather allergic to adverts and didn't even realise that there are two Channel 4s now. Interestingly, the title now appears to be ''The Genius of Charles Darwin''. So that's the viddy set, something to look forward to. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
613271 +++$+++ DannyMuse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613269 +++$+++ 613270 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.217755560E09 +++$+++ BTW, I watched a [http:\/\/richarddawkins.net\/article,2925,n,n clip] of the show on Richard Dawkins' page and it both begins and ends discussing \"evolution\". Not surprising, but the association is interesting to note. --   +++$+++ ::BTW, I watched a [http://richarddawkins.net/article,2925,n,n clip] of the show on Richard Dawkins' page and it both begins and ends discussing "evolution". Not surprising, but the association is interesting to note. --  [[User:DannyMuse|DannyMuse]] ([[User talk:DannyMuse|talk]]) 02:26, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

9601 +++$+++ Kleinzach +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-14 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.300093260E09 +++$+++ Perhaps he forgot to tell you? Regards. --'' +++$+++ Perhaps he forgot to tell you? Regards. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 02:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
9602 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9601 +++$+++ 9601 +++$+++ 2011-03-19 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.300564740E09 +++$+++ Done, commented. Sorry for the delay, I'm too busy with real life today. :P ''''' +++$+++ :Done, commented. Sorry for the delay, I'm too busy with real life today. :P '''''[[User:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|DARTH SIDIOUS 2]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|Contact]])</sup> 12:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

9603 +++$+++ Dualumni +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9603 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-14 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.305424620E09 +++$+++ Can you please advise on this and do the needful? Thanks  +++$+++ Can you please advise on this and do the needful? Thanks [[User:Dualumni|Dualumni]] ([[User talk:Dualumni|talk]]) 18:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
9604 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ DARTH SIDIOUS 2 +++$+++ 9603 +++$+++ 9603 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.306612020E09 +++$+++ I didn't actually give ''you'' a warning. Most propably someone else had that IP of yours in use previously, whom I then warned, and now you got the message. ''''' +++$+++ :I didn't actually give ''you'' a warning. Most propably someone else had that IP of yours in use previously, whom I then warned, and now you got the message. '''''[[User:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|DARTH SIDIOUS 2]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|Contact]])</sup> 12:47, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

533893 +++$+++ AnnaFabiano +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-18 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.250634060E09 +++$+++ I found a translation from Turkish to English of a text from a XVII century traveler that mentions Kosovo, I believe it would be worthy mentioning that it was '''not''' 1800's the first time that ''Kosovo'' was used as a name for that administrative territory. About the theory of the name ''Kosovo'' being a Turkish name, I would agree that there is a gap of sources! Sot it is fair that you removed it.  +++$+++ I found a translation from Turkish to English of a text from a XVII century traveler that mentions Kosovo, I believe it would be worthy mentioning that it was '''not''' 1800's the first time that ''Kosovo'' was used as a name for that administrative territory. About the theory of the name ''Kosovo'' being a Turkish name, I would agree that there is a gap of sources! Sot it is fair that you removed it. [[User:AnnaFabiano|AnnaFabiano]] ([[User talk:AnnaFabiano|talk]]) 15:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
533894 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533893 +++$+++ 533893 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.250634180E09 +++$+++ I'm fine with that, however, since the article is a bit controversial, you may want to discuss changes on the talkpage of the article first. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : I'm fine with that, however, since the article is a bit controversial, you may want to discuss changes on the talkpage of the article first. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

9606 +++$+++ Xyl 54 +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ 9606 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-30 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.309477260E09 +++$+++ This article (or it's previous incarnation) has already gone through a merge process (contrary to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Mussolini%27s_Mare_Nostrum&diff=prev&oldid=435374553 this comment], the previous AfD recommended its issues \"be addressed by re-writing, merging or re-directing it\", which was done, per consensus, after lengthy discussion); it is not only disruptive, but panders to the banned users agenda, to force everyone to go through the whole thing again.  +++$+++ This article (or it's previous incarnation) has already gone through a merge process (contrary to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mussolini%27s_Mare_Nostrum&diff=prev&oldid=435374553 this comment], the previous AfD recommended its issues "be addressed by re-writing, merging or re-directing it", which was done, per consensus, after lengthy discussion); it is not only disruptive, but panders to the banned users agenda, to force everyone to go through the whole thing again. [[User:Xyl 54|Xyl 54]] ([[User talk:Xyl 54|talk]]) 16:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
9607 +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ 9606 +++$+++ 9606 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.309482180E09 +++$+++ You yourself admitted that there is not enough evidence to prove that NRex4 is a sockpuppet: \"Fair enough; I\u2019d assumed Nrex4 was a sock of [[User:Brunodam]], who wrote the original article, but on looking,the connection isn't asserted anywhere.\" I did indeed see his block log with {{tl|checkuserblock}}, but I could not find any link to who the original sockpuppeteer might be. This is important, because articles created before a ban are not subject to G5. As for the content, content forks are subject to deletion \"''unless a merger or redirect is appropriate''.\" Many !voters in the AfD have suggested that a merger is indeed appropriate. -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]]  +++$+++ :You yourself admitted that there is not enough evidence to prove that NRex4 is a sockpuppet: "Fair enough; I’d assumed Nrex4 was a sock of [[User:Brunodam]], who wrote the original article, but on looking,the connection isn't asserted anywhere." I did indeed see his block log with {{tl|checkuserblock}}, but I could not find any link to who the original sockpuppeteer might be. This is important, because articles created before a ban are not subject to G5. As for the content, content forks are subject to deletion "''unless a merger or redirect is appropriate''." Many !voters in the AfD have suggested that a merger is indeed appropriate. -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|<font color="red">&hearts;</font>]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|<font color="red">&diams;</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|<font color="black">&clubs;</font>]] &spades; 18:03, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
9608 +++$+++ Xyl 54 +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ 9606 +++$+++ 9607 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.309546860E09 +++$+++ So to say that a banned user can come back with a new account and their edits are OK until they are outed is to create a cavernous loophole in WP:BAN: Is that really what we mean?  +++$+++ ::So to say that a banned user can come back with a new account and their edits are OK until they are outed is to create a cavernous loophole in WP:BAN: Is that really what we mean? [[User:Xyl 54|Xyl 54]] ([[User talk:Xyl 54|talk]]) 12:01, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
9609 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ 9606 +++$+++ 9608 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.309568760E09 +++$+++ I've been asked to comment on this issue. It is not enough to say that an editor is the sock on another editor who is banned. What we need is to know ''exactly who'' the banned user is. Otherwise G5 cannot be applied.  +++$+++ :::I've been asked to comment on this issue. It is not enough to say that an editor is the sock on another editor who is banned. What we need is to know ''exactly who'' the banned user is. Otherwise G5 cannot be applied. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 18:06, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
9610 +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ 9606 +++$+++ 9608 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.309576620E09 +++$+++ Clarifying what I mean by \"articles created before a ban are not subject to G5\": If a user gets banned, and then creates a sockpuppet to evade that ban, then any articles the sock creates are subject to G5 because they were created after the ban (ban is per user, not per account). But if a user already has a sockpuppet, uses it to create an article, and then gets banned, that article is not subject to G5 because it was created before the ban. That is why we have to know the identity of the sockpuppeteer. -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]]  +++$+++ :::Clarifying what I mean by "articles created before a ban are not subject to G5": If a user gets banned, and then creates a sockpuppet to evade that ban, then any articles the sock creates are subject to G5 because they were created after the ban (ban is per user, not per account). But if a user already has a sockpuppet, uses it to create an article, and then gets banned, that article is not subject to G5 because it was created before the ban. That is why we have to know the identity of the sockpuppeteer. -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|<font color="red">&hearts;</font>]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|<font color="red">&diams;</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|<font color="black">&clubs;</font>]] &spades; 20:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
9611 +++$+++ Xyl 54 +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ 9606 +++$+++ 9610 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.309599120E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... I can see what you're (both) getting at (though it still seems like cutting a lot of slack). On the subject of \"who\", though, [[User:Shell Kinney|the banning admin]] [[User talk:Shell Kinney#Banned user|said]] it was, in fact, [[User:Brunodam|Brunodam]]; I don't know how that affects things.  +++$+++ ::::Hmmm... I can see what you're (both) getting at (though it still seems like cutting a lot of slack). On the subject of "who", though, [[User:Shell Kinney|the banning admin]] [[User talk:Shell Kinney#Banned user|said]] it was, in fact, [[User:Brunodam|Brunodam]]; I don't know how that affects things. [[User:Xyl 54|Xyl 54]] ([[User talk:Xyl 54|talk]]) 02:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
9612 +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ 9606 +++$+++ 9611 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.309783740E09 +++$+++ A statement from a person in the know is enough. Deleted. -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]]  +++$+++ :::::A statement from a person in the know is enough. Deleted. -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|<font color="red">&hearts;</font>]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|<font color="red">&diams;</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|<font color="black">&clubs;</font>]] &spades; 05:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
9613 +++$+++ Xyl 54 +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ 9606 +++$+++ 9612 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.309792320E09 +++$+++ I've just noticed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Mussolini's Mare Nostrum|this]]; thanks for doing that! and my respect to you for grasping the nettle, on this one. Regards,  +++$+++ ::::::I've just noticed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mussolini's Mare Nostrum|this]]; thanks for doing that! and my respect to you for grasping the nettle, on this one. Regards, [[User:Xyl 54|Xyl 54]] ([[User talk:Xyl 54|talk]]) 08:12, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

533895 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-21 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.250894940E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'm not sure why you relisted this. I participated in the discuss so I inherently have a bias, but consensus seemed strongly on the side of deletion. [[WP:RELIST]] instructs to only relist discussions if they have been under-attended, so could you please explain your decision a bit? Cheers. \u2013''' +++$+++ Hi. I'm not sure why you relisted this. I participated in the discuss so I inherently have a bias, but consensus seemed strongly on the side of deletion. [[WP:RELIST]] instructs to only relist discussions if they have been under-attended, so could you please explain your decision a bit? Cheers. –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 15:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
533896 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533895 +++$+++ 533895 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.250902020E09 +++$+++ Hi. Yeah, I am in favour of deletion as well. However, there's an AfD on the pretty much same topic, US TV program, and I believe there should be a broader consensus because it affects several articles. Anyway, any admin can close it any time, no need to wait 7 days before closing now. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Yeah, I am in favour of deletion as well. However, there's an AfD on the pretty much same topic, US TV program, and I believe there should be a broader consensus because it affects several articles. Anyway, any admin can close it any time, no need to wait 7 days before closing now. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:47, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
533897 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533895 +++$+++ 533896 +++$+++ 2009-08-22 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.250934360E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, thanks for the explanation. \u2013''' +++$+++ ::Fair enough, thanks for the explanation. –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 02:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

533898 +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-23 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.251069180E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Tim1357|Tim1357]] ([[User talk:Tim1357|talk]]) 16:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
533899 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533898 +++$+++ 533898 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.251081720E09 +++$+++ Done. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Done. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
533900 +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533898 +++$+++ 533899 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.251085800E09 +++$+++ Thanks, sorry i came off a bit rude in my request, i was in a rush to get out the door.-- +++$+++ :: Thanks, sorry i came off a bit rude in my request, i was in a rush to get out the door.--[[User:Tim1357|Tim1357]] ([[User talk:Tim1357|talk]]) 20:50, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
533901 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533898 +++$+++ 533900 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.251085980E09 +++$+++ Don't worry ;-) --''' +++$+++ ::: Don't worry ;-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:53, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

454230 +++$+++ Pkalmar +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-27 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.196222700E09 +++$+++ Hi.  Your signature seems to constantly confuse my XML Parser when I parse Wikipedia pages.  What is the significance of <pre>&#0xfeff;<\/pre> and how should it be parsed?  Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi.  Your signature seems to constantly confuse my XML Parser when I parse Wikipedia pages.  What is the significance of <pre>&#0xfeff;</pre> and how should it be parsed?  Thanks. [[User:Pkalmar|Pkalmar]] ([[User talk:Pkalmar|talk]]) 20:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
454231 +++$+++ fvw +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454230 +++$+++ 454230 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.197225660E09 +++$+++ How strange, my signature is one of the top google hits for &#0xfeff; yet I don't recall ever having had anything like that in my signature. Unicode character 0xfeff is the zero width space, often also used as a byte order mark. To get it to be a proper entity would require getting rid of the leading 0 of the number though. Perhaps it's an artifact of the conversion of en.wikipedia to utf-8? Not sure what made it choose to single out my sig for this treatment though. You could try asking at [[WP:HD|the helpdesk]] if anyone knows anything about this. Good luck! -- +++$+++ :How strange, my signature is one of the top google hits for &#0xfeff; yet I don't recall ever having had anything like that in my signature. Unicode character 0xfeff is the zero width space, often also used as a byte order mark. To get it to be a proper entity would require getting rid of the leading 0 of the number though. Perhaps it's an artifact of the conversion of en.wikipedia to utf-8? Not sure what made it choose to single out my sig for this treatment though. You could try asking at [[WP:HD|the helpdesk]] if anyone knows anything about this. Good luck! --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 10:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
454232 +++$+++ Hoary +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454230 +++$+++ 454231 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.197237660E09 +++$+++ Allow me to kibitz. FEFF in hex is equivalent to 65279 in decimal; &amp;#65279; is indeed the zero width space; but if you prefer to use hex it's &amp;#xfeff; (with no zero or other character interrupting the opening sequence &amp;#x). (See [http:\/\/www.alanwood.net\/unicode\/htmlunicode.html this page] and other stuff on that man's site.) But I've a hunch that even if this is fixed and the result satisfies XML parsers, it may well confuse some HTML browsers. --  +++$+++ ::Allow me to kibitz. FEFF in hex is equivalent to 65279 in decimal; &amp;#65279; is indeed the zero width space; but if you prefer to use hex it's &amp;#xfeff; (with no zero or other character interrupting the opening sequence &amp;#x). (See [http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/htmlunicode.html this page] and other stuff on that man's site.) But I've a hunch that even if this is fixed and the result satisfies XML parsers, it may well confuse some HTML browsers. -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary|talk]]) 14:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
454233 +++$+++ PrimeHunter +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454230 +++$+++ 454231 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.197457440E09 +++$+++ For your orientation, the matter has been at [[Wikipedia:Help desk#Invalid XML entities]] and is now at [[Wikipedia:Bot requests#Invalid XML\/HTML Entity Fix]].  +++$+++ ::For your orientation, the matter has been at [[Wikipedia:Help desk#Invalid XML entities]] and is now at [[Wikipedia:Bot requests#Invalid XML/HTML Entity Fix]]. [[User:PrimeHunter|PrimeHunter]] ([[User talk:PrimeHunter|talk]]) 03:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
454234 +++$+++ fvw +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454230 +++$+++ 454230 +++$+++ 2008-12-05 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.228478340E09 +++$+++ Hi, I deleted the post because there was no context here, it was impossible to tell what the article was actually about (see [[WP:Csd]]). Note that resubmitting the article in a fleshed out form with sufficient background information will not guarantee that it is kept, but it will at least give it a chance of being evaluated on whether the subject is worth including. Good luck! -- +++$+++ :Hi, I deleted the post because there was no context here, it was impossible to tell what the article was actually about (see [[WP:Csd]]). Note that resubmitting the article in a fleshed out form with sufficient background information will not guarantee that it is kept, but it will at least give it a chance of being evaluated on whether the subject is worth including. Good luck! --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 03:59, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

533902 +++$+++ Tariqabjotu +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-26 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.251319500E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&curid=482256&diff=310162371&oldid=310156435 Classy]. -- ''' +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&curid=482256&diff=310162371&oldid=310156435 Classy]. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 13:45, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
533903 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533902 +++$+++ 533902 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.251321600E09 +++$+++ As long as people are arguing about this one, it shouldn't go on ITN... that's all... --''' +++$+++ : As long as people are arguing about this one, it shouldn't go on ITN... that's all... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
533904 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533902 +++$+++ 533903 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.251346080E09 +++$+++ I suggest you not revert that addition again. This has been raised at AN and AN\/I. I'm not uninvolved but I imagine there are plenty of uninvolved admins who would be willing to block you for edit warring if you did. ++ +++$+++ :: I suggest you not revert that addition again. This has been raised at AN and AN/I. I'm not uninvolved but I imagine there are plenty of uninvolved admins who would be willing to block you for edit warring if you did. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 21:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
533905 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533902 +++$+++ 533904 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.251346320E09 +++$+++ I assume you haven't read my comment at the last revert. I have no intention of edit warring whatsoever. I invite you to constructively participate in future ITN\/C debates so that such disputes won't occur again. --''' +++$+++ ::: I assume you haven't read my comment at the last revert. I have no intention of edit warring whatsoever. I invite you to constructively participate in future ITN/C debates so that such disputes won't occur again. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
533906 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533902 +++$+++ 533905 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.251346860E09 +++$+++ The antidote to insularity is wider participation. I think the better place to start seeking fresh eyes is on the guidelines themselves rather than the debates, but ya... glad to. Time permitting, of course. (Most of my en:wp time today was spent CUing). ++ +++$+++ :::: The antidote to insularity is wider participation. I think the better place to start seeking fresh eyes is on the guidelines themselves rather than the debates, but ya... glad to. Time permitting, of course. (Most of my en:wp time today was spent CUing). ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 21:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
533907 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533902 +++$+++ 533906 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.251347280E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I know... there was some progress last year when we reshuffled the guidelines for the first time in a while. Needs more eyes for sure, after all, ITN it is on the Main page. Well, maybe something good will come out of this discussion today and more people will participate in future... who knows. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ ::::: Yeah, I know... there was some progress last year when we reshuffled the guidelines for the first time in a while. Needs more eyes for sure, after all, ITN it is on the Main page. Well, maybe something good will come out of this discussion today and more people will participate in future... who knows. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

569581 +++$+++ Krasniy +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-09 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.168401540E09 +++$+++ Hello! How do you personally archive your talk page? I've looked into the bot that does it and other methods but wondered what you do, and why you use it. Also, that box on top of your talk page, is that a template or can I yoink the code from here to put on mine? :) \u2248 +++$+++ Hello! How do you personally archive your talk page? I've looked into the bot that does it and other methods but wondered what you do, and why you use it. Also, that box on top of your talk page, is that a template or can I yoink the code from here to put on mine? :) ≈[[User:Krasniy|<span style="color: #800">Krasniy</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Krasniy|t]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Krasniy|c]]</sub> 19:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
569582 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569581 +++$+++ 569581 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.168410480E09 +++$+++ It's quite ok for you to steal code from my or any other page.  I think that I stole it from someone else in the dim-and-distant past.  There are many more elegant pages than mine out there and also automated archive features, so don't be afraid to experiment.  It's a good idea to not let your Talk page rise above 32k in size as some browsers cut off articles that are larger than this, and you don't want editors losing their comments because of Wiki-browser interaction issues.  Regards,  +++$+++ :It's quite ok for you to steal code from my or any other page.  I think that I stole it from someone else in the dim-and-distant past.  There are many more elegant pages than mine out there and also automated archive features, so don't be afraid to experiment.  It's a good idea to not let your Talk page rise above 32k in size as some browsers cut off articles that are larger than this, and you don't want editors losing their comments because of Wiki-browser interaction issues.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
569583 +++$+++ Krasniy +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569581 +++$+++ 569582 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.168416300E09 +++$+++ Ah oke, that sounds pretty simple. Thanks a lot! \u2248 +++$+++ ::Ah oke, that sounds pretty simple. Thanks a lot! ≈[[User:Krasniy|<span style="color: #800">Krasniy</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Krasniy|t]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Krasniy|c]]</sub> 00:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

9616 +++$+++ Cjc13 +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ 9616 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.312390680E09 +++$+++ Forgive my inexperience of Wikipedia procedure but it seems odd to close a review when only those who took part in the original discussion have commented on the review. This does not seem to be any sort of review. Incidently the closer of the original debate, [[User:Occuli|Occuli]] ([[User talk:Occuli|talk]]), nominated a similar debate on 30 July, [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2011_July_30#Alumni of schools in Wales|Alumni of schools in Wales]] which was closed after only 2 days [[User:Timrollpickering|Timrollpickering]] ([[User talk:Timrollpickering|talk]]), a supporter in the orginal debate. He claimed it was on speedy criteria but if I had had the chance I would have challenged that. It is clear that both administrators are not neutral in these debates. What am I meant to do in the case of the second discussion? There is currently a [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools#RFC for naming of by school student related categories|RFC for naming of by school student related categories]] which shows that there is opposition to the new names used, although my grounds for appeal would be that Wikipedia procedures have not been followed.  +++$+++ Forgive my inexperience of Wikipedia procedure but it seems odd to close a review when only those who took part in the original discussion have commented on the review. This does not seem to be any sort of review. Incidently the closer of the original debate, [[User:Occuli|Occuli]] ([[User talk:Occuli|talk]]), nominated a similar debate on 30 July, [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_July_30#Alumni of schools in Wales|Alumni of schools in Wales]] which was closed after only 2 days [[User:Timrollpickering|Timrollpickering]] ([[User talk:Timrollpickering|talk]]), a supporter in the orginal debate. He claimed it was on speedy criteria but if I had had the chance I would have challenged that. It is clear that both administrators are not neutral in these debates. What am I meant to do in the case of the second discussion? There is currently a [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools#RFC for naming of by school student related categories|RFC for naming of by school student related categories]] which shows that there is opposition to the new names used, although my grounds for appeal would be that Wikipedia procedures have not been followed. [[User:Cjc13|Cjc13]] ([[User talk:Cjc13|talk]]) 09:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
9617 +++$+++ Occuli +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ 9616 +++$+++ 9616 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.312398540E09 +++$+++ I am not an admin and have never closed any cfds (Vegaswikian closed the other one in question and opened an rfc). Cjc13 simply does not see a consensus when he is not in it.  +++$+++ :I am not an admin and have never closed any cfds (Vegaswikian closed the other one in question and opened an rfc). Cjc13 simply does not see a consensus when he is not in it. [[User:Occuli|Occuli]] ([[User talk:Occuli|talk]]) 12:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
9618 +++$+++ Cjc13 +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ 9616 +++$+++ 9617 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 12:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312401360E09 +++$+++ Apologises for mistaking Occuli for an admin. The actual admin who closed the cfd was [[User:Vegaswikian|Vegaswikian]] ([[User talk:Vegaswikian|talk]]). Vegaswikian includes on his talk page [[User talk:Vegaswikian#Old fooian and related category nominations|this dicussion with Timrollpickering]] which suggests he is not neutral on the subject.  +++$+++ ::Apologises for mistaking Occuli for an admin. The actual admin who closed the cfd was [[User:Vegaswikian|Vegaswikian]] ([[User talk:Vegaswikian|talk]]). Vegaswikian includes on his talk page [[User talk:Vegaswikian#Old fooian and related category nominations|this dicussion with Timrollpickering]] which suggests he is not neutral on the subject. [[User:Cjc13|Cjc13]] ([[User talk:Cjc13|talk]]) 12:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
9619 +++$+++ Occuli +++$+++ King of Hearts +++$+++ 9616 +++$+++ 9618 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312403040E09 +++$+++ Apologies accepted. And any rfas will be declined.  +++$+++ :::Apologies accepted. And any rfas will be declined. [[User:Occuli|Occuli]] ([[User talk:Occuli|talk]]) 13:24, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

533908 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-26 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.251345060E09 +++$+++ Just a courtesy note that I've added Ted Kennedy back to [[Template:In the news]] per the increasingly strong consensus at [[WP:ITN\/C]]. I apologize if I've stepped on any toes. \u2013''' +++$+++ Just a courtesy note that I've added Ted Kennedy back to [[Template:In the news]] per the increasingly strong consensus at [[WP:ITN/C]]. I apologize if I've stepped on any toes. –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 20:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
533909 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533908 +++$+++ 533908 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.251345540E09 +++$+++ Don't worry. I've decided to step down here because this is really getting ridiculous. Interpretation of a consensus may be tricky in this case because both sides have relevant arguments. The criteria are not perfect, this we are aware of. There have been some attempts to make them better but this is what we have at the moment. It would be great if more people participated in the daily debates because ITN is seriously lacking staff and this is just a side effect of it. --''' +++$+++ : Don't worry. I've decided to step down here because this is really getting ridiculous. Interpretation of a consensus may be tricky in this case because both sides have relevant arguments. The criteria are not perfect, this we are aware of. There have been some attempts to make them better but this is what we have at the moment. It would be great if more people participated in the daily debates because ITN is seriously lacking staff and this is just a side effect of it. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

271765 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271765 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-10 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.223640420E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 05:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
271766 +++$+++ Hersfold +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271765 +++$+++ 271765 +++$+++ 2008-11-01 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.225540860E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, the way you did it, I now need to delete the new page to merge the histories together. In the future, please simply use the \"move\" tab at the top of the page - this allows you to rename an article, moving the entire history to the new title. You can find more information at [[WP:MOVE]]. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue\">Hers<\/em><em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold\">fold<\/em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold\/t|t]]\/ +++$+++ :Unfortunately, the way you did it, I now need to delete the new page to merge the histories together. In the future, please simply use the "move" tab at the top of the page - this allows you to rename an article, moving the entire history to the new title. You can find more information at [[WP:MOVE]]. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold</em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold/t|t]]/[[User:Hersfold/a|a]]/[[Special:Contributions/Hersfold|c]])</sup> 05:01, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
271767 +++$+++ Hersfold +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271765 +++$+++ 271766 +++$+++ 2008-11-01 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.225541460E09 +++$+++ It ''should'' be fixed now, however if something still looks funny after you [[WP:PURGE|purge the servers and clear your cache]], let me know. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue\">Hers<\/em><em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold\">fold<\/em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold\/t|t]]\/ +++$+++ ::It ''should'' be fixed now, however if something still looks funny after you [[WP:PURGE|purge the servers and clear your cache]], let me know. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold</em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold/t|t]]/[[User:Hersfold/a|a]]/[[Special:Contributions/Hersfold|c]])</sup> 05:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

533910 +++$+++ Systems polk +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533910 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.251451380E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Systems polk|Systems polk]] ([[User talk:Systems polk|talk]]) 02:23, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
533911 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533910 +++$+++ 533910 +++$+++ 2009-08-30 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.251684600E09 +++$+++ Hi. The text of the article then was a copy of [http:\/\/www.salaam.co.uk\/themeofthemonth\/september03_index.php?l=9#ali a website]. If the link still works, you can find the content there. If you would like to recreate the article, you should write it in your own words and then it will be fine. Gretings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The text of the article then was a copy of [http://www.salaam.co.uk/themeofthemonth/september03_index.php?l=9#ali a website]. If the link still works, you can find the content there. If you would like to recreate the article, you should write it in your own words and then it will be fine. Gretings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 19:10, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

613273 +++$+++ JoshuaZ +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613273 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-08 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.218261720E09 +++$+++ That seems to be a highly reasonable solution to the issue there. My thanks.  +++$+++ That seems to be a highly reasonable solution to the issue there. My thanks. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] ([[User talk:JoshuaZ|talk]]) 23:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
613274 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613273 +++$+++ 613273 +++$+++ 2008-08-08 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.218262800E09 +++$+++ No problem, I just don't like \"criticism sections\". If someone can check out the other sources, there's probably a fair amount of positive stuff about him in these stories. . .  +++$+++ :No problem, I just don't like "criticism sections". If someone can check out the other sources, there's probably a fair amount of positive stuff about him in these stories. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 23:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

533912 +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-31 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.251759780E09 +++$+++ Hi. With all due respect, could I kindly ask why you think the geographic locations are \"totally redundant?\" Isn't that template there for a reason? Isn't it helpful? In peace,  +++$+++ Hi. With all due respect, could I kindly ask why you think the geographic locations are "totally redundant?" Isn't that template there for a reason? Isn't it helpful? In peace, [[User:Eu.stefan|eu.stefan]] ([[User talk:Eu.stefan|talk]]) 16:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
533913 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533912 +++$+++ 533912 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.251767340E09 +++$+++ Hi. I agree it can be useful in article about cities but for countries, there is a map in the infobox and all the surrounding countries\/seas\/else are stated in the intro and linked. So, for that purpose, useless. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I agree it can be useful in article about cities but for countries, there is a map in the infobox and all the surrounding countries/seas/else are stated in the intro and linked. So, for that purpose, useless. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
533914 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533912 +++$+++ 533913 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.251767940E09 +++$+++ Actually, I also think it is too big and provides too little information\/size in its present state. However, for articles without maps, I see it is somehow useful. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ :: Actually, I also think it is too big and provides too little information/size in its present state. However, for articles without maps, I see it is somehow useful. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
533915 +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533912 +++$+++ 533914 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.251768060E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for your explanation. I see your point there. Cheers!  +++$+++ ::: OK, thanks for your explanation. I see your point there. Cheers! [[User:Eu.stefan|eu.stefan]] ([[User talk:Eu.stefan|talk]]) 18:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

271769 +++$+++ Pattav2 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-04 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.225791960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Pattav2|Pattav2]] ([[User talk:Pattav2|talk]]) 01:46, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
271770 +++$+++ RHaworth +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271769 +++$+++ 271769 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.225801320E09 +++$+++ It was a waste of time sending [[Pattav2]] to MfD. The obvious action was to userfy it or [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&offset=20081104040340&limit=1&user=RHaworth move it to the correct title]! &mdash;  +++$+++ * It was a waste of time sending [[Pattav2]] to MfD. The obvious action was to userfy it or [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&offset=20081104040340&limit=1&user=RHaworth move it to the correct title]! &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|Talk]] | [[special:contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 04:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

9626 +++$+++ Notpietru +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-08 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.257719220E09 +++$+++ Hey there. I'm afraid I find some of the edits you are making rather unacceptable, in an historical revisionism sort of way. The choice of words is carefully chosen, and not entirely open to rewrites, certainly not without consensus. If you would like to propose changes, please raise them on the talk page; re-writing history is not acceptable. Of course, this may not (hopefully!) be your intention, but considering the sorts of editors who focus on these pages, one should always be alert. Thanks for your understanding and attention.  +++$+++ Hey there. I'm afraid I find some of the edits you are making rather unacceptable, in an historical revisionism sort of way. The choice of words is carefully chosen, and not entirely open to rewrites, certainly not without consensus. If you would like to propose changes, please raise them on the talk page; re-writing history is not acceptable. Of course, this may not (hopefully!) be your intention, but considering the sorts of editors who focus on these pages, one should always be alert. Thanks for your understanding and attention. [[User:Notpietru|Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση]] ([[User talk:Notpietru|talk]]) 14:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
9627 +++$+++ Notpietru +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9626 +++$+++ 9626 +++$+++ 2009-11-08 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.257719460E09 +++$+++ Also, you seem to have some difficulties with the English language; \"relieved\" (\"relief\") does not simply refer to bowel movements. ''Please be careful, this is the English language wiki and some proficiency in the language is required.''  +++$+++ :Also, you seem to have some difficulties with the English language; "relieved" ("relief") does not simply refer to bowel movements. ''Please be careful, this is the English language wiki and some proficiency in the language is required.'' [[User:Notpietru|Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση]] ([[User talk:Notpietru|talk]]) 14:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
9628 +++$+++ Notpietru +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9626 +++$+++ 9627 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.257756900E09 +++$+++ My comments were not aggressive - I was simply pointing out a statement of fact, and suggesting the use of talk pages as appropriate. Also, you didn't sign your post properly. Take care,  +++$+++ ::My comments were not aggressive - I was simply pointing out a statement of fact, and suggesting the use of talk pages as appropriate. Also, you didn't sign your post properly. Take care, [[User:Notpietru|Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση]] ([[User talk:Notpietru|talk]]) 00:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

45295 +++$+++ John Cardinal +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-07 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.265582940E09 +++$+++ I saw your [[Elvis Presley]] edit where you sequenced unauthored references by ref name. Previously, they were by the article title. I am pretty sure the rule for the Harvard style is to order by article title and that's why I sort them that way. I see your point, however, that finding the item by the same text as used in the short reference is easier when going from the short footnote full reference. (I wonder why the Harvard syle specifies it otherwise?) Savvy readers will know they can click the short icon link to scroll to and highlight the appropriate reference, and that's the easiest way no matter what the sequence is. \u2014  +++$+++ I saw your [[Elvis Presley]] edit where you sequenced unauthored references by ref name. Previously, they were by the article title. I am pretty sure the rule for the Harvard style is to order by article title and that's why I sort them that way. I see your point, however, that finding the item by the same text as used in the short reference is easier when going from the short footnote full reference. (I wonder why the Harvard syle specifies it otherwise?) Savvy readers will know they can click the short icon link to scroll to and highlight the appropriate reference, and that's the easiest way no matter what the sequence is. — [[User:John Cardinal|John Cardinal]] ([[User talk:John Cardinal|talk]]) 14:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
45296 +++$+++ John Cardinal +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45295 +++$+++ 45295 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.265605980E09 +++$+++ For the time being, I am going to keep my script as is; editors can adjust the reference by specifying the web site as both {{para|work}} and {{para|author}}, and then sort by author (as done now) to get the same output as shown in the guide. If you do any more research and find something useful, please send the links along. Thanks. \u2014  +++$+++ :For the time being, I am going to keep my script as is; editors can adjust the reference by specifying the web site as both {{para|work}} and {{para|author}}, and then sort by author (as done now) to get the same output as shown in the guide. If you do any more research and find something useful, please send the links along. Thanks. — [[User:John Cardinal|John Cardinal]] ([[User talk:John Cardinal|talk]]) 21:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

533916 +++$+++ Shoessss +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-31 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.251784860E09 +++$+++ Hello there [[User:Tone|Tone]], just wanted to drop a quick semi-annual note to say hello :-).  Been awhile since I saw you around, guess we are just traveling in different circles now :-).  Take care and I hope all is well.  <font face=\"Times New Roman\"> +++$+++ Hello there [[User:Tone|Tone]], just wanted to drop a quick semi-annual note to say hello :-).  Been awhile since I saw you around, guess we are just traveling in different circles now :-).  Take care and I hope all is well.  <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></font> 23:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
533917 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533916 +++$+++ 533916 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.251813540E09 +++$+++ Hey, long time not seen, indeed! Yes, everything is doing well, more or less, thank you. I hope you're fine as well. See you around. --''' +++$+++ : Hey, long time not seen, indeed! Yes, everything is doing well, more or less, thank you. I hope you're fine as well. See you around. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 06:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

482202 +++$+++ UnitedStatesIndia +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482202 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-07 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.165485900E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for the warm welcome! I am pleased to be part of the Wikipedia community and looking forward to contribute as much as I can to this website. However, I have a question. I am very interested in the U.S. Congress and I have seen many pages of current U.S. Senators who have \"served with: _____ \". It looks really bad and was wondering, how I can create a template, like the on that has \"Political Offices\"  +++$+++ Thank you very much for the warm welcome! I am pleased to be part of the Wikipedia community and looking forward to contribute as much as I can to this website. However, I have a question. I am very interested in the U.S. Congress and I have seen many pages of current U.S. Senators who have "served with: _____ ". It looks really bad and was wondering, how I can create a template, like the on that has "Political Offices" [[User:UnitedStatesIndia|UnitedStatesIndia]] 02:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
482203 +++$+++ Mythsearcher +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482202 +++$+++ 482202 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.165499160E09 +++$+++ A lot of unsourced POV was added into the Negima!? page, and that is why the edit war was going on.  I was trying to remove the POV contents while at the same time trying my best to communicate with the user who was adding his own comments into all of the three pages he is trying to edit.  The current protected version of Negima!? contains a lot of sentences like ''this angered a lot of fans'', ''many see these characters as useless''.  Which are all POV statements made by the user Animedude, without sources, even after I have repeatedly asked for them.  If possible, can you please edit the page to reflect a more NPOV version of that page? Thank you.  +++$+++ :A lot of unsourced POV was added into the Negima!? page, and that is why the edit war was going on.  I was trying to remove the POV contents while at the same time trying my best to communicate with the user who was adding his own comments into all of the three pages he is trying to edit.  The current protected version of Negima!? contains a lot of sentences like ''this angered a lot of fans'', ''many see these characters as useless''.  Which are all POV statements made by the user Animedude, without sources, even after I have repeatedly asked for them.  If possible, can you please edit the page to reflect a more NPOV version of that page? Thank you. [[User:Mythsearcher|MythSearcher]]<sup>[[User talk:Mythsearcher|talk]]</sup> 05:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

9630 +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9630 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-12 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.263368940E09 +++$+++ Thank you for reviewing the [[Harry M\xe4nnil]] article and cleaning up where necessary. I made some additions to the article and I'd be grateful, if you took another glance at it, if it's not too much hassle. Here is the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Harry_M%C3%A4nnil&action=historysubmit&diff=337489624&oldid=337473481 diff] of my changes. Best wishes,  +++$+++ Thank you for reviewing the [[Harry Männil]] article and cleaning up where necessary. I made some additions to the article and I'd be grateful, if you took another glance at it, if it's not too much hassle. Here is the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_M%C3%A4nnil&action=historysubmit&diff=337489624&oldid=337473481 diff] of my changes. Best wishes, [[User:Quibik|Quibik]] ([[User talk:Quibik|talk]]) 23:49, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
9631 +++$+++ Quibik +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9630 +++$+++ 9630 +++$+++ 2010-01-14 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.263517260E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :) \u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks! :) —[[User:Quibik|Quibik]] ([[User talk:Quibik|talk]]) 17:01, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

525893 +++$+++ Tintin1107 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-25 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.140857460E09 +++$+++ If there any standard for using single or double quote in ''Padmanabh Govind \"Nana\" Joshi'' ? If there isn't, I would like to go back to single quotes.  +++$+++ If there any standard for using single or double quote in ''Padmanabh Govind "Nana" Joshi'' ? If there isn't, I would like to go back to single quotes. [[User:Tintin1107|Tintin]] ([[User_talk:Tintin1107|talk]]) 00:51, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
525894 +++$+++ Tintin1107 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525893 +++$+++ 525893 +++$+++ 2006-02-25 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.140859020E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Let it stay the way you have changed it.  +++$+++ :Thanks. Let it stay the way you have changed it. [[User:Tintin1107|Tintin]] ([[User_talk:Tintin1107|talk]]) 01:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

271776 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271776 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-10 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.226326380E09 +++$+++ Anyway, thanks again. I'll see you around.  +++$+++ Anyway, thanks again. I'll see you around. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 06:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
271777 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271776 +++$+++ 271776 +++$+++ 2008-11-10 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.226332500E09 +++$+++ Peace.  +++$+++ :Peace. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 07:55, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
271778 +++$+++ Bwilkins +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271776 +++$+++ 271777 +++$+++ 2008-11-11 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.226433420E09 +++$+++ Err, with the significant number of \"delete\" votes, a non-admin closure\/withdrawal is not appropriate.  You might want to re-think this - I'd rather not be the one that re-opens it as it would be a bit of a slap in the face to you. <span style=\"border:1px solid black;\"> +++$+++ :: Err, with the significant number of "delete" votes, a non-admin closure/withdrawal is not appropriate.  You might want to re-think this - I'd rather not be the one that re-opens it as it would be a bit of a slap in the face to you. <span style="border:1px solid black;">[[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="background:white;">-t </font>]]<font style="color:white;background:black;">'''BMW'''</font>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="background:white;"> c-</font>]]</span> 11:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
271779 +++$+++ Bwilkins +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271776 +++$+++ 271778 +++$+++ 2008-11-11 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.226469060E09 +++$+++ Honestly, I still see no notability.  A lesbian couple on TV *yawn* .. nothing new to see.   Size of the article doesn't matter - is it important enough to have a separate article, or can it be dealt with inside a character's article?  <span style=\"border:1px solid black;\"> +++$+++ ::: Honestly, I still see no notability.  A lesbian couple on TV *yawn* .. nothing new to see.   Size of the article doesn't matter - is it important enough to have a separate article, or can it be dealt with inside a character's article?  <span style="border:1px solid black;">[[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="background:white;">-t </font>]]<font style="color:white;background:black;">'''BMW'''</font>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="background:white;"> c-</font>]]</span> 21:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

9633 +++$+++ Crosbiesmith +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-27 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.264653420E09 +++$+++ User:Masterknighted -  you have been inappropriately adding the [[:Template:Recent death|Template:Recent deaths]] tag to articles.   This template should only be used when many editors (perhaps a hundred or more) are editing the article on the same day. Do not use it merely to tag the article of a recently deceased person. -  +++$+++ User:Masterknighted -  you have been inappropriately adding the [[:Template:Recent death|Template:Recent deaths]] tag to articles.   This template should only be used when many editors (perhaps a hundred or more) are editing the article on the same day. Do not use it merely to tag the article of a recently deceased person. - [[User:Crosbiesmith|Crosbiesmith]] ([[User talk:Crosbiesmith|talk]]) 20:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
9634 +++$+++ Crosbiesmith +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9633 +++$+++ 9633 +++$+++ 2010-01-30 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.264893360E09 +++$+++ Have you now read the template guidelines?  Have you consciously decided to ignore them? -   +++$+++ :Have you now read the template guidelines?  Have you consciously decided to ignore them? -  [[User:Crosbiesmith|Crosbiesmith]] ([[User talk:Crosbiesmith|talk]]) 15:16, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

9635 +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-30 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.264893720E09 +++$+++ I read it why don't you lecture everyone else wo puts those tags up there now +++$+++ I read it why don't you lecture everyone else wo puts those tags up there now[[User:Masterknighted|Masterknighted]] ([[User talk:Masterknighted#top|talk]]) 15:22, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
9636 +++$+++ Rettetast +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9635 +++$+++ 9635 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.265692800E09 +++$+++ What Crosbiesmith said. Please don't add the tag to every recent death.  +++$+++ :What Crosbiesmith said. Please don't add the tag to every recent death. [[User:Rettetast|Rettetast]] ([[User talk:Rettetast|talk]]) 21:20, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

9637 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9637 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-08 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.265679480E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at [[:Paul O'Grady]]. Content of this nature could be regarded as [[Wikipedia:Libel|defamatory]] and is in violation of [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|Wikipedia policy]]. If you continue, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-biog3 --> ''Nothing about his death on the news. I suggest you stop making that kind of edit.''  +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at [[:Paul O'Grady]]. Content of this nature could be regarded as [[Wikipedia:Libel|defamatory]] and is in violation of [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|Wikipedia policy]]. If you continue, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-biog3 --> ''Nothing about his death on the news. I suggest you stop making that kind of edit.'' [[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 17:38, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
9638 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9637 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.265679780E09 +++$+++ If he had been listed in [[Deaths in 2010]], it should have been [[WP:RS|reliably sourced]]; per [[WP:BLP|policy on biographies]], we require cast-iron sources before making edits like that. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::If he had been listed in [[Deaths in 2010]], it should have been [[WP:RS|reliably sourced]]; per [[WP:BLP|policy on biographies]], we require cast-iron sources before making edits like that. Cheers. [[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 17:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
9639 +++$+++ Crosbiesmith +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9637 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.265691120E09 +++$+++ You should not add the [[:Template:Recent death|recent deaths]] tag to articles, the only exceptions being ''heavily edited'' articles.   In this case, you were the first person to edit the article today.  -  +++$+++ ::You should not add the [[:Template:Recent death|recent deaths]] tag to articles, the only exceptions being ''heavily edited'' articles.   In this case, you were the first person to edit the article today.  - [[User:Crosbiesmith|Crosbiesmith]] ([[User talk:Crosbiesmith|talk]]) 20:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
9640 +++$+++ NuclearWarfare +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ 9637 +++$+++ 9637 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.265690400E09 +++$+++ Hey there. I saw you make [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=John_Murtha&action=historysubmit&diff=342771417&oldid=342770753 this edit] to the article. Please do not do that again without providing a source. Thank you. <font color=\"navy\">''' +++$+++ :Hey there. I saw you make [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Murtha&action=historysubmit&diff=342771417&oldid=342770753 this edit] to the article. Please do not do that again without providing a source. Thank you. <font color="navy">'''[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 20:40, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

271783 +++$+++ TrackerTV +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271783 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-17 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.232197140E09 +++$+++ [[Template:The Weather Channel]]: What's causing the \"white\" space on the right?  +++$+++ [[Template:The Weather Channel]]: What's causing the "white" space on the right? [[User:TrackerTV|Raymie Humbert]] ([[User talk:TrackerTV|local radar]] | [[Special:Contributions/TrackerTV|current conditions]]) 04:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
271784 +++$+++ Hersfold +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271783 +++$+++ 271783 +++$+++ 2009-01-17 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.232198520E09 +++$+++ Taken care of in IRC. Let us know if you need help again. :-) [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue\">Hers<\/em><em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold\">fold<\/em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold\/t|t]]\/ +++$+++ :Taken care of in IRC. Let us know if you need help again. :-) [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold</em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold/t|t]]/[[User:Hersfold/a|a]]/[[Special:Contributions/Hersfold|c]])</sup> 05:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

533928 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-06 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.252224900E09 +++$+++ Hi! Since you closed the initial poll\/discussion at [[Wikipedia:Centralized discussion\/Deprecating \"Future\" templates]], I was wondering if you could comment on what has since come up with opposition after implementation had started. It would be nice to have another view. \u2013 +++$+++ Hi! Since you closed the initial poll/discussion at [[Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Deprecating "Future" templates]], I was wondering if you could comment on what has since come up with opposition after implementation had started. It would be nice to have another view. –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[Special:Log/Drilnoth|L]]) 01:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
533929 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533928 +++$+++ 533928 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.252420560E09 +++$+++ Checked again. The text is almost a copy of the text from the website. Try to write it in your own words. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Checked again. The text is almost a copy of the text from the website. Try to write it in your own words. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:36, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

482204 +++$+++ IrishJew +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482204 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-07 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.165511340E09 +++$+++ Hi there, probably not my business but I'm wondering (at the risk of getting myself put on some suspicious persons list...) why was the user [[User:Techmobowls]] blocked?  I'll condede that he can be difficult\/downright stupid when people disagree with him, but is that blockworthy behavior?  Maybe it is, I don't know WP policy well enough, but if it's just an issue of vandalism\/trolling I don't really think he qualifies as either.  Thanks for hte clarification!  +++$+++ Hi there, probably not my business but I'm wondering (at the risk of getting myself put on some suspicious persons list...) why was the user [[User:Techmobowls]] blocked?  I'll condede that he can be difficult/downright stupid when people disagree with him, but is that blockworthy behavior?  Maybe it is, I don't know WP policy well enough, but if it's just an issue of vandalism/trolling I don't really think he qualifies as either.  Thanks for hte clarification! [[User:IrishJew|Avraham]] 09:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
482205 +++$+++ IrishJew +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482204 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.165556700E09 +++$+++ Hi.  First of all, thanks for your reply.  I actually was loking at User:Techmobowls and just his edits, which didn't seem seem like vandalism, however I did not realise that he was impersonating another user, that puts a whole different spin on things.  As for my NPA violation, I suppose you're right, though I didn't mean it as a personal attack.  More like: \"I understand how he could have rubbed some poeple the wrong way but does that really merit blocking?\"  Anyway, thanks for your reply.  +++$+++ ::Hi.  First of all, thanks for your reply.  I actually was loking at User:Techmobowls and just his edits, which didn't seem seem like vandalism, however I did not realise that he was impersonating another user, that puts a whole different spin on things.  As for my NPA violation, I suppose you're right, though I didn't mean it as a personal attack.  More like: "I understand how he could have rubbed some poeple the wrong way but does that really merit blocking?"  Anyway, thanks for your reply. [[User:IrishJew|Avraham]] 21:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
482206 +++$+++ IrishJew +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482204 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.165568400E09 +++$+++ Found it because I too am a sockpuppet.  Kidding!  I just found it by pure chance on the Hank Aaron talk page.  I found [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Hank_Aaron#More_Photos|This exchange]] Too weird to not look into, so I checked out Techmobowls's user contribs. which seemed weird but didn't explain the block.   +++$+++ :::Found it because I too am a sockpuppet.  Kidding!  I just found it by pure chance on the Hank Aaron talk page.  I found [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hank_Aaron#More_Photos|This exchange]] Too weird to not look into, so I checked out Techmobowls's user contribs. which seemed weird but didn't explain the block.  [[User:IrishJew|Avraham]] 01:00, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

533930 +++$+++ TenPoundHammer +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-08 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.252458840E09 +++$+++ You might want to salt this, it's been speedied thrice now. <span style=\"color:green\">Ten Pound Hammer<\/span>, his otters and a clue-bat \u2022 <sup>([[Special:Contributions\/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] \u2022 [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] \u2022  +++$+++ You might want to salt this, it's been speedied thrice now. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 18:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
533931 +++$+++ Lugnuts +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533930 +++$+++ 533930 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.252465320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for salting this, Tone. The same article has been re-created but with a lower-case on the surname here - [[Ilyass derfouf]]. Can you do the same, please?  I've added the necessary speedy tag. Thanks. ''' +++$+++ :Thanks for salting this, Tone. The same article has been re-created but with a lower-case on the surname here - [[Ilyass derfouf]]. Can you do the same, please?  I've added the necessary speedy tag. Thanks. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Lugnuts|talk]]) 20:02, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
533932 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533930 +++$+++ 533931 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.252468020E09 +++$+++ Done. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ :: Done. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
533933 +++$+++ Lugnuts +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533930 +++$+++ 533932 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.252505460E09 +++$+++ Thanks again! ''' +++$+++ :::Thanks again! '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Lugnuts|talk]]) 07:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

445502 +++$+++ Hoops gza +++$+++ OberRanks +++$+++ 445502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310356560E09 +++$+++ Hey, can you tell what rank [[Lorenz Hackenholt]] has in [[:File:Hackenholt.jpg|this photograph]]? - +++$+++ Hey, can you tell what rank [[Lorenz Hackenholt]] has in [[:File:Hackenholt.jpg|this photograph]]? -[[User:Hoops gza|Hoops gza]] ([[User talk:Hoops gza|talk]]) 20:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
445503 +++$+++ OberRanks +++$+++ OberRanks +++$+++ 445502 +++$+++ 445502 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.310366040E09 +++$+++ He appears to be wearing an Army uniform with the rank of [[Gefreiter]] and also is wearing the Equestrian Riding Badge...I think. - +++$+++ :He appears to be wearing an Army uniform with the rank of [[Gefreiter]] and also is wearing the Equestrian Riding Badge...I think. -[[User:OberRanks|OberRanks]] ([[User talk:OberRanks#top|talk]]) 23:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

533934 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-08 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.252472580E09 +++$+++ If you are around, could you have a look at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Ken Hoang (3rd nomination)]]?  There are calls for a speedy close now that the nom has been banned as a sock. I would do it myself, but I voted :) Thanks!  +++$+++ If you are around, could you have a look at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Hoang (3rd nomination)]]?  There are calls for a speedy close now that the nom has been banned as a sock. I would do it myself, but I voted :) Thanks! [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 22:03, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
533935 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533934 +++$+++ 533934 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.252550880E09 +++$+++ {{done}} Never mind. Thanks.  +++$+++ :{{done}} Never mind. Thanks. [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 19:48, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

88989 +++$+++ Silverije +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88989 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-08 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.268104320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Silverije|Silverije]] ([[User talk:Silverije|talk]]) 19:12, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
88990 +++$+++ Squash Racket +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 88989 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.268786400E09 +++$+++ [[User:Iadrian yu]] evades his block he received for edit warring.  +++$+++ ::[[User:Iadrian yu]] evades his block he received for edit warring. [[User:Squash Racket|Squash Racket]] ([[User talk:Squash Racket|talk]]) 17:40, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

533936 +++$+++ Dchmelik +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533936 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-09 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.252480260E09 +++$+++ You 'closed the debate' before it was really closed.  I had created the article and I asked for an explanation of 'NN,' and when I got the reply I explained why it is notable.  Apparently it was deleted by then, but I would like to be able to make my statement in the debate.-- +++$+++ You 'closed the debate' before it was really closed.  I had created the article and I asked for an explanation of 'NN,' and when I got the reply I explained why it is notable.  Apparently it was deleted by then, but I would like to be able to make my statement in the debate.--[[User:Dchmelik|Dchmelik]] ([[User talk:Dchmelik|talk]]) 00:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
533937 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533936 +++$+++ 533936 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.252505040E09 +++$+++ Hi. Then, it is probably best if you rewrite the article in your userspace, addressing all the criteria, and then contact the original nominator to have a look. If it is ok then, just move it back to the articlespace. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Then, it is probably best if you rewrite the article in your userspace, addressing all the criteria, and then contact the original nominator to have a look. If it is ok then, just move it back to the articlespace. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
533938 +++$+++ Dchmelik +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533936 +++$+++ 533937 +++$+++ 2009-09-10 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.252592160E09 +++$+++ I guess also the problem is most\/all the other Wikimedia wikis notify you of messages you want to read, but this one does not (and maybe there was a time limit.)  Ok, I will try to do that, though I still do not know why it was nominated NN.  I will have to see if there is a way I can get the article back since I wrote it.-- +++$+++ ::I guess also the problem is most/all the other Wikimedia wikis notify you of messages you want to read, but this one does not (and maybe there was a time limit.)  Ok, I will try to do that, though I still do not know why it was nominated NN.  I will have to see if there is a way I can get the article back since I wrote it.--[[User:Dchmelik|Dchmelik]] ([[User talk:Dchmelik|talk]]) 07:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
533939 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533936 +++$+++ 533938 +++$+++ 2009-09-10 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.252592760E09 +++$+++ I can provide you the content, just tell me where shall I put it. The easiest way to be notified is to put pages on your watchlist, there's a button on the top of each page. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ ::: I can provide you the content, just tell me where shall I put it. The easiest way to be notified is to put pages on your watchlist, there's a button on the top of each page. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
533940 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533936 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-11 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.252694880E09 +++$+++ Yep, that can be a problem... Anyway, the content is there. Not much of a content but for a start... Cheers. --''' +++$+++ ::::: Yep, that can be a problem... Anyway, the content is there. Not much of a content but for a start... Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:48, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

525896 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-09 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.141939140E09 +++$+++ Just opened a USMC Portal and could use some help if you have the chance.  Thanks in advance. -- +++$+++ Just opened a USMC Portal and could use some help if you have the chance.  Thanks in advance. --[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 13:19, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
525897 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-21 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.142941080E09 +++$+++ Two quick ones.... 1) I am having a hard time finding \"Good\" feature article.  Any ideas for this week?  I am reluctant to just throw something half decent up there but we may have to do that until our Portal gets a bit more robust and we have a large amount of articles to use.  This actually leads to my 2nd point which is do you think it would be worth it to have a new section on the portal for \"Collaboration of the Week\"  This way we can build up a decent feature articles database.  Feature by our standards not the actual Wikipedia standards.  that will have to wait till later.  Thoughts?-- +++$+++ **Two quick ones.... 1) I am having a hard time finding "Good" feature article.  Any ideas for this week?  I am reluctant to just throw something half decent up there but we may have to do that until our Portal gets a bit more robust and we have a large amount of articles to use.  This actually leads to my 2nd point which is do you think it would be worth it to have a new section on the portal for "Collaboration of the Week"  This way we can build up a decent feature articles database.  Feature by our standards not the actual Wikipedia standards.  that will have to wait till later.  Thoughts?--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 03:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
525898 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-21 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.142941860E09 +++$+++ Feature article ideas: [[Joe Foss]], Medal of Honor recipient. &mdash; +++$+++ *** Feature article ideas: [[Joe Foss]], Medal of Honor recipient. &mdash;[[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] @ 03:51, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
525899 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ 2006-03-13 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.142262420E09 +++$+++ Your rocking tonight with the articles.  Since you have the momentum, and are the main effort at the moment is there anything you need help with?  I have a 1\/2 hour to kill.-- +++$+++ * Your rocking tonight with the articles.  Since you have the momentum, and are the main effort at the moment is there anything you need help with?  I have a 1/2 hour to kill.--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 07:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
525900 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ 2006-03-14 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.142323260E09 +++$+++ As far as the commandants go what is left is between the guy after Lejeune and Al Grey.  Many of the ones in between have been done but there are a few that have been missed.-- +++$+++ * As far as the commandants go what is left is between the guy after Lejeune and Al Grey.  Many of the ones in between have been done but there are a few that have been missed.--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 00:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
525901 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ 2006-03-14 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.142368800E09 +++$+++ You takeChapman and I'll get Wilson?-- +++$+++ * You takeChapman and I'll get Wilson?--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 12:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
525902 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ 525901 +++$+++ 2006-03-14 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.142370600E09 +++$+++ Might be easier to get on the same page.  Who are you working on right now and I'll go to the next guy?-- +++$+++ ** Might be easier to get on the same page.  Who are you working on right now and I'll go to the next guy?--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 13:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
525903 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ 525902 +++$+++ 2006-03-14 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.142371560E09 +++$+++ I'll take Barrow and you got Kelley.-- +++$+++ *** I'll take Barrow and you got Kelley.--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 13:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
525904 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ 525902 +++$+++ 2006-03-14 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.142371980E09 +++$+++ Something popped up so I have to run for the rest of the morning.  I will pick up whaere you left off when I get back  Yut-- +++$+++ *** Something popped up so I have to run for the rest of the morning.  I will pick up whaere you left off when I get back  Yut--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 13:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
525905 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ 525896 +++$+++ 2006-03-20 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.142854440E09 +++$+++ Agree on medals.  Go by order of precedence down to the Purple Heart.  Don't need anything below that because they will all have NAMs and NCOMs.  Good job on the MOH articles.  I think the whole USMC portion of Wikipedia is starting to look pretty good.  Uniformity is getting there and content is improving.  Someday it will be where it needs to be-- +++$+++ * Agree on medals.  Go by order of precedence down to the Purple Heart.  Don't need anything below that because they will all have NAMs and NCOMs.  Good job on the MOH articles.  I think the whole USMC portion of Wikipedia is starting to look pretty good.  Uniformity is getting there and content is improving.  Someday it will be where it needs to be--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 03:34, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

569587 +++$+++ Maxdave2010 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569587 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-10 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.168481100E09 +++$+++ Hi there! Thanks for your offer of adoption. Sorry it took me so long to get around to responding, I almost forgot about it! If you're still interested, I would be delighted to be adopted by you. It would be nice to have someone who can help me out once in a while. This Wikipedia business is fun, but a little overwhelming. The UK time issue is not a problem seeing as I am in the UK myself :)  +++$+++ Hi there! Thanks for your offer of adoption. Sorry it took me so long to get around to responding, I almost forgot about it! If you're still interested, I would be delighted to be adopted by you. It would be nice to have someone who can help me out once in a while. This Wikipedia business is fun, but a little overwhelming. The UK time issue is not a problem seeing as I am in the UK myself :) [[User:Maxdave2010|Maxdave2010]] 18:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
569588 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569587 +++$+++ 569587 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.168481280E09 +++$+++ Not a problem, welcome aboard!  You can ask me any question about Wikipedia editing, policy or process that occurs to you.  Don't be afraid!  I'll try to help as best I can.  Check out my Talk page and archives for other questions that my adoptees have asked.  You might have similar questions.  Welcome to Wikipedia and have a great time contributing, ok?  +++$+++ :Not a problem, welcome aboard!  You can ask me any question about Wikipedia editing, policy or process that occurs to you.  Don't be afraid!  I'll try to help as best I can.  Check out my Talk page and archives for other questions that my adoptees have asked.  You might have similar questions.  Welcome to Wikipedia and have a great time contributing, ok? [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 18:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

271796 +++$+++ RIPGC +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271796 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-02 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.280740800E09 +++$+++ If the article stays, I'm not mad.  I was just surprised to see that it was an article, that's all!  +++$+++ If the article stays, I'm not mad.  I was just surprised to see that it was an article, that's all! [[User:RIPGC|RIPGC]] ([[User talk:RIPGC|talk]]) 02:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
271797 +++$+++ Mandsford +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271796 +++$+++ 271796 +++$+++ 2010-08-08 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.281254340E09 +++$+++ The table looks great, and I'd recommend it as a model for other school system articles to follow.  I was hoping that the info about the feeder system would be carried over, and that a way would be found to fit in the mascots and school colors as well (my only nitpick is that I'd go with the plural, e.g. Tigers instead of Tiger).  You've got a knack for design, Tracker-- as I say, I'd cite that as an example of how a school district article should look.   +++$+++ *The table looks great, and I'd recommend it as a model for other school system articles to follow.  I was hoping that the info about the feeder system would be carried over, and that a way would be found to fit in the mascots and school colors as well (my only nitpick is that I'd go with the plural, e.g. Tigers instead of Tiger).  You've got a knack for design, Tracker-- as I say, I'd cite that as an example of how a school district article should look.  [[User:Mandsford|Mandsford]] 00:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

533941 +++$+++ PlatinumFire +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533941 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-13 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.252865100E09 +++$+++ Can \"Unusual You\" be recreated now, cause it's gettin radio airplay? please see [[Talk:Circus_(Britney_Spears_album)#Unusual_You_Radio_Release]] --<font face=\"maiandra\"> +++$+++ Can "Unusual You" be recreated now, cause it's gettin radio airplay? please see [[Talk:Circus_(Britney_Spears_album)#Unusual_You_Radio_Release]] --<font face="maiandra">[[User:PlatinumFire|<font color="silver">'''''Platinum'''''</font>]][[User talk:PlatinumFire|<font color="gold">'''''Fire'''''</font>]]</font> 11:05, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
533942 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533941 +++$+++ 533941 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.252866300E09 +++$+++ It's just a redirect so all the history is preserved. If you think it is time to recreate it, go ahead. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : It's just a redirect so all the history is preserved. If you think it is time to recreate it, go ahead. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:25, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

271798 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-11 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.281579360E09 +++$+++ Hello Raymie. I tried to improve [[Treasures of the Snow]] that you flagged as AfD \u2013 thanks for AfDing it instead of A7ing \u2013 as you say, to give someone a chance to rescue it. What do you reckon? Is what I've done sufficient to rescue it? Cheers \u2014  +++$+++ Hello Raymie. I tried to improve [[Treasures of the Snow]] that you flagged as AfD – thanks for AfDing it instead of A7ing – as you say, to give someone a chance to rescue it. What do you reckon? Is what I've done sufficient to rescue it? Cheers — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides|talk]]) 19:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
271799 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271798 +++$+++ 271798 +++$+++ 2010-08-15 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.281921060E09 +++$+++ Hello again. I had a go at a plot summary (a lot harder to write than I imagined), and although it may be a bit rough around the edges I thought I'd better upload it as the AfD deadline is approaching. This is not the sort of article I normally write, so I looked at articles like [[The Wind in the Willows]] and [[Treasure Island]] to get some idea of the amount of detail that is expected. Any suggestions would be much appreciated. Best regards \u2014  +++$+++ :Hello again. I had a go at a plot summary (a lot harder to write than I imagined), and although it may be a bit rough around the edges I thought I'd better upload it as the AfD deadline is approaching. This is not the sort of article I normally write, so I looked at articles like [[The Wind in the Willows]] and [[Treasure Island]] to get some idea of the amount of detail that is expected. Any suggestions would be much appreciated. Best regards — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides|talk]]) 18:11, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

533943 +++$+++ Dumelow +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533943 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-14 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.252945800E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone, any chance you could add the ITN [[Wikipedia:In_the_news#Recognition|notification]] to the talk page for [[Norman Borlaug]] (and please credit me for the nom!), it seems to have been missed when the update was done.  Cheers -  +++$+++ Hi Tone, any chance you could add the ITN [[Wikipedia:In_the_news#Recognition|notification]] to the talk page for [[Norman Borlaug]] (and please credit me for the nom!), it seems to have been missed when the update was done.  Cheers - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 09:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
533944 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533943 +++$+++ 533943 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.252949700E09 +++$+++ Hi. I am really not a fan of this ITN credits but I suppose sooner or later one of the regulars will put the boxes on the proper sites. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I am really not a fan of this ITN credits but I suppose sooner or later one of the regulars will put the boxes on the proper sites. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
533945 +++$+++ Dumelow +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533943 +++$+++ 533944 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.252984980E09 +++$+++ Ah, no probs.  The item in question has been taken down and discussion is going on about whether to put it back up anyway so it probably doesn't even warrant it.  Cheers -  +++$+++ ::Ah, no probs.  The item in question has been taken down and discussion is going on about whether to put it back up anyway so it probably doesn't even warrant it.  Cheers - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 20:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

533946 +++$+++ 68.5.78.30 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-14 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.252977840E09 +++$+++ Miyachi Unitek [[Special:Contributions\/68.5.78.30|68.5.78.30]] ( +++$+++ Miyachi Unitek [[Special:Contributions/68.5.78.30|68.5.78.30]] ([[User talk:68.5.78.30|talk]]) 18:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
533947 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.252988460E09 +++$+++ Hi. I can't tell you about the other one but let's have a look at the Resistance projection welding article. It got tagged as a copyvio - this means that the text was copied from another website and this is not ok with Wikipedia copyright policies. Considering the fact that the article is not very long, it can be recreated with little effort, just try to write it in your own words. If nobody tags the article as a copyvio, it will not get deleted as it happened this time and if there are any issues, you can discuss them on the talkpage. They are useful, once you get used to them. And people do use them. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask. Good luck! --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I can't tell you about the other one but let's have a look at the Resistance projection welding article. It got tagged as a copyvio - this means that the text was copied from another website and this is not ok with Wikipedia copyright policies. Considering the fact that the article is not very long, it can be recreated with little effort, just try to write it in your own words. If nobody tags the article as a copyvio, it will not get deleted as it happened this time and if there are any issues, you can discuss them on the talkpage. They are useful, once you get used to them. And people do use them. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask. Good luck! --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
533948 +++$+++ 64.94.102.20 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.253071380E09 +++$+++ Text not taken from another website.  Taken directly from our published, copyrighted datasheet.  See page 3 paragraph 1 in http:\/\/www.muc.miyachi.com\/res_resources\/pdf\/FundamentalsofRW.pdf  Can't paraphrase that - it is what it is.  So the OTHER content - wherever it is on Wikipedia - should be removed.  Not my entry.  [[Special:Contributions\/64.94.102.20|64.94.102.20]] ( +++$+++ : Text not taken from another website.  Taken directly from our published, copyrighted datasheet.  See page 3 paragraph 1 in http://www.muc.miyachi.com/res_resources/pdf/FundamentalsofRW.pdf  Can't paraphrase that - it is what it is.  So the OTHER content - wherever it is on Wikipedia - should be removed.  Not my entry.  [[Special:Contributions/64.94.102.20|64.94.102.20]] ([[User talk:64.94.102.20|talk]]) 20:23, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
533949 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.252988460E09 +++$+++ Hi. I can't find the article, could you give me the exact title (with the proper capitals and all that)? Then I'll have a look, without the article I can help you here, really... --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I can't find the article, could you give me the exact title (with the proper capitals and all that)? Then I'll have a look, without the article I can help you here, really... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
533950 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.253041560E09 +++$+++ What kind of help would you like? --''' +++$+++ : What kind of help would you like? --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:06, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
533951 +++$+++ CocaCirca2009 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.253076120E09 +++$+++ I want to contest over your deletion of the page. You claim that it was copywritten from a [http:\/\/www.noypitayo.com\/2009\/08\/agimat-presentstiagong-akyat-casts-characters\/ website]. Even though, the story of the real person, \"Tiagong Akyat\" was taken from the [http:\/\/en.wikipilipinas.org\/index.php?title=Tiagong_Akyat WikiPilipinas] page; the page for the Philippine informations. While the character and other information were taken from the [http:\/\/www.abs-cbn.com\/Weekends\/article\/4546\/tiagongakyat\/Agimat-Presents-Tiagong-Akyat.aspx show's website]. To conclude, it isnt the wikipedia editors who copywritten the [http:\/\/www.noypitayo.com\/2009\/08\/agimat-presentstiagong-akyat-casts-characters\/ website], but its the [http:\/\/www.noypitayo.com\/2009\/08\/agimat-presentstiagong-akyat-casts-characters\/ website] who took copyrights from the wikipedia page. -- +++$+++ *I want to contest over your deletion of the page. You claim that it was copywritten from a [http://www.noypitayo.com/2009/08/agimat-presentstiagong-akyat-casts-characters/ website]. Even though, the story of the real person, "Tiagong Akyat" was taken from the [http://en.wikipilipinas.org/index.php?title=Tiagong_Akyat WikiPilipinas] page; the page for the Philippine informations. While the character and other information were taken from the [http://www.abs-cbn.com/Weekends/article/4546/tiagongakyat/Agimat-Presents-Tiagong-Akyat.aspx show's website]. To conclude, it isnt the wikipedia editors who copywritten the [http://www.noypitayo.com/2009/08/agimat-presentstiagong-akyat-casts-characters/ website], but its the [http://www.noypitayo.com/2009/08/agimat-presentstiagong-akyat-casts-characters/ website] who took copyrights from the wikipedia page. --[[User:CocaCirca2009|CocaCirca2009]] ([[User talk:CocaCirca2009|talk]]) 21:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
533952 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ 533946 +++$+++ 2009-09-21 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.253577840E09 +++$+++ Tricky one... well, in that case someone should contact that website and remind them to credit Wikipedia as a source of their content. However, since the series is very new, I believe it may be a little to late to have a separate article about the character, why not wait a couple of months and recreate the article then? Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Tricky one... well, in that case someone should contact that website and remind them to credit Wikipedia as a source of their content. However, since the series is very new, I believe it may be a little to late to have a separate article about the character, why not wait a couple of months and recreate the article then? Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:04, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

271803 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-19 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.290164220E09 +++$+++ I want to add a parenthetical title to [[Holbrook High School]] and make the existing site a disambiguation page (for my new article [[Holbrook High School (Arizona)]]. What would be the best parenthetical piece to add...Suffolk? Ipswich?  +++$+++ I want to add a parenthetical title to [[Holbrook High School]] and make the existing site a disambiguation page (for my new article [[Holbrook High School (Arizona)]]. What would be the best parenthetical piece to add...Suffolk? Ipswich? [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 02:57, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
271804 +++$+++ Fetchcomms +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271803 +++$+++ 271803 +++$+++ 2010-11-19 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.290164400E09 +++$+++ I would imagine Suffolk as the better choice, but I don't think it's a major deal. <span style=\"font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;\">'''\/ +++$+++ :I would imagine Suffolk as the better choice, but I don't think it's a major deal. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 03:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
271805 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271803 +++$+++ 271803 +++$+++ 2010-11-19 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.290164700E09 +++$+++ I don't quite like the suggestion above of 'Suffolk', simply because we'd not really use the region name with a school in that way - what I mean is, we'd say \"Foo school in Ipswich\" and not \"Foo school in Suffolk\". But, for whatever odd reason, I'd find \"Foo school in England\" to be more natural. For what it's worth, I'm English. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ :I don't quite like the suggestion above of 'Suffolk', simply because we'd not really use the region name with a school in that way - what I mean is, we'd say "Foo school in Ipswich" and not "Foo school in Suffolk". But, for whatever odd reason, I'd find "Foo school in England" to be more natural. For what it's worth, I'm English. <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 03:05, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
271806 +++$+++ Blue Square Thing +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271803 +++$+++ 271803 +++$+++ 2010-11-19 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.290229740E09 +++$+++ Might be a good idea to add this to the talk page of the article btw. I'd have argued Suffolk, but then I live here. Or Ipswich. I've also fixed the few disamb issues that resulted, in particular the schools in Suffolk template. Might be worth being aware of such relationships if you have to do a similar thing in the future. :-) OK?  +++$+++ :Might be a good idea to add this to the talk page of the article btw. I'd have argued Suffolk, but then I live here. Or Ipswich. I've also fixed the few disamb issues that resulted, in particular the schools in Suffolk template. Might be worth being aware of such relationships if you have to do a similar thing in the future. :-) OK? [[User:Blue Square Thing|Blue Square Thing]] ([[User talk:Blue Square Thing|talk]]) 21:09, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

271807 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-25 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.290675660E09 +++$+++ I've created another new article, [[Gilbert Christian Schools]]. The school chain in question has two campuses, and I want the infobox to have the capability to show both. Is it possible to create a fork of [[Template:Infobox school]] or to add the capability to display two campus sites in the infobox?  +++$+++ I've created another new article, [[Gilbert Christian Schools]]. The school chain in question has two campuses, and I want the infobox to have the capability to show both. Is it possible to create a fork of [[Template:Infobox school]] or to add the capability to display two campus sites in the infobox? [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 01:01, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
271808 +++$+++ Fetchcomms +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271807 +++$+++ 271807 +++$+++ 2010-11-25 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.290676380E09 +++$+++ You'll need to use two infoboxes or combine the info into one infobox (i.e. Principal: Person 1 (middle school); Person 2 (high school), etc.). <span style=\"font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;\">'''\/ +++$+++ :You'll need to use two infoboxes or combine the info into one infobox (i.e. Principal: Person 1 (middle school); Person 2 (high school), etc.). <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 01:13, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
271809 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271807 +++$+++ 271807 +++$+++ 2010-11-25 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.290676440E09 +++$+++ Also, please note that articles need to show [[WP:VRS|notability]], and must have appropriate [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], otherwise they are likely to be deleted. See [[WP:YFA]]. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ :Also, please note that articles need to show [[WP:VRS|notability]], and must have appropriate [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], otherwise they are likely to be deleted. See [[WP:YFA]]. <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 01:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

9664 +++$+++ @pple +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9664 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-29 09:17:00 +++$+++ 1.185725820E09 +++$+++ Aciram, I don't know how to say but I was truck with shock when reading the announcement on your userpage that you will no longer take part in Wikipedia. Though I've known you just one day so far, I was really impressed by your invaluable addition to Wikipedia's content. I'm going to miss you. I still hope that you'll come back someday. ''Best wishes''.  +++$+++ Aciram, I don't know how to say but I was truck with shock when reading the announcement on your userpage that you will no longer take part in Wikipedia. Though I've known you just one day so far, I was really impressed by your invaluable addition to Wikipedia's content. I'm going to miss you. I still hope that you'll come back someday. ''Best wishes''. [[User:@pple|@pple]] 09:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
9665 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9664 +++$+++ 9664 +++$+++ 2007-08-16 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.187258400E09 +++$+++ And from me.  Truly sorry to see you've left.  A great contributor who will be missed.  If you do decide to return someday, please drop me a line to say hello. &mdash; +++$+++ :And from me.  Truly sorry to see you've left.  A great contributor who will be missed.  If you do decide to return someday, please drop me a line to say hello. &mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 03:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

533953 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533953 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-21 09:07:00 +++$+++ 1.253549220E09 +++$+++ Hello Tone. Do you think he is ready to post? --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ Hello Tone. Do you think he is ready to post? --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 09:07, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
533954 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533953 +++$+++ 533953 +++$+++ 2009-09-21 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.253577420E09 +++$+++ I believe so. In case it is not too late (old news) --''' +++$+++ : I believe so. In case it is not too late (old news) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

9666 +++$+++ @pple +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-10 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.192022700E09 +++$+++ I'm glad that you've come back. What can I say, I've never seen such a prolific editor. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Aciram&namespace=&year=&month=-1 Good job]! Hope to see you regularly. ''Best regards''.  +++$+++ I'm glad that you've come back. What can I say, I've never seen such a prolific editor. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Aciram&namespace=&year=&month=-1 Good job]! Hope to see you regularly. ''Best regards''. [[User:@pple|@pple]] <small>[[User talk:@pple|complain]]</small> 06:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
9667 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9666 +++$+++ 9666 +++$+++ 2007-12-11 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.197407760E09 +++$+++ What great news.  Welcome! &mdash; +++$+++ :What great news.  Welcome! &mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 13:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

533956 +++$+++ Location +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533956 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-21 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.253599980E09 +++$+++ I noticed that [[Gladys Darling]] used to redirect to [[Mamacita]] prior to the later article being removed in an Afd that you closed: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Mamacita (2nd nomination)]]. Are you able to check to see if [[Gladys Darling]] is simply a recreation [[Mamacita]]? Thanks!  +++$+++ I noticed that [[Gladys Darling]] used to redirect to [[Mamacita]] prior to the later article being removed in an Afd that you closed: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamacita (2nd nomination)]]. Are you able to check to see if [[Gladys Darling]] is simply a recreation [[Mamacita]]? Thanks! [[User:Location|Location]] ([[User talk:Location|talk]]) 23:13, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
533957 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533956 +++$+++ 533956 +++$+++ 2009-09-23 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.253764800E09 +++$+++ Yes, it pretty much is a recreation of the previous one. Will you take care of that? Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Yes, it pretty much is a recreation of the previous one. Will you take care of that? Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:00, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

9669 +++$+++ Refsworldlee +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-21 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.206157560E09 +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for all your good work so far in creating historical biographies from the Scandinavian countries. I have wikified and English-grammaticised many of them before giving them a classification, but I am here asking if you could develop them as fully as possible yourself before you submit them for assessment, as it takes me a deal of time to bring them up to standard before I (or any of us at Biography) can honestly assess them while complying with Wikipedia guidelines\/policies. For now, I have tagged the latest batch with wikification templates, hoping that this will attract someone who can find the time to do this. When they are up to standard, we will be able to give them a classification. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for all your good work so far in creating historical biographies from the Scandinavian countries. I have wikified and English-grammaticised many of them before giving them a classification, but I am here asking if you could develop them as fully as possible yourself before you submit them for assessment, as it takes me a deal of time to bring them up to standard before I (or any of us at Biography) can honestly assess them while complying with Wikipedia guidelines/policies. For now, I have tagged the latest batch with wikification templates, hoping that this will attract someone who can find the time to do this. When they are up to standard, we will be able to give them a classification. Thanks. [[User:Refsworldlee|'''Ref''']] <sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(do)</small>]] 20:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
9670 +++$+++ Refsworldlee +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9669 +++$+++ 9669 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.206160560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your understanding. When I get time I will have a look at some of your articles to see if I can bring them up a bit. For now, keep up the good work. Best wishes.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your understanding. When I get time I will have a look at some of your articles to see if I can bring them up a bit. For now, keep up the good work. Best wishes. [[User:Refsworldlee|'''Ref''']] <sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(do)</small>]] 21:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

533958 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-21 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.253601660E09 +++$+++ Now that some more ITNs have been posted ([[Precious (film)|Precious]], [[Northern Sea Route]], etc.) and the two sports ITNs are no longer consecutively aligned, is there space for the [[2009 All-Ireland Senior Football Championship Final]]? It seems odd to leave it out as it is more popular than [[hurling]] and there are still [http:\/\/www.brisbanetimes.com.au\/sport\/afl\/swans-will-welcome-kennelly-with-open-arms-20090922-fyr7.html references] to the game in the Australian media. --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ Now that some more ITNs have been posted ([[Precious (film)|Precious]], [[Northern Sea Route]], etc.) and the two sports ITNs are no longer consecutively aligned, is there space for the [[2009 All-Ireland Senior Football Championship Final]]? It seems odd to leave it out as it is more popular than [[hurling]] and there are still [http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/afl/swans-will-welcome-kennelly-with-open-arms-20090922-fyr7.html references] to the game in the Australian media. --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 23:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
533959 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533958 +++$+++ 533958 +++$+++ 2009-09-22 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.253629080E09 +++$+++ I am still not really enthousiastic to have it on ITN... Opposition is quite strong at ITN\/C as well. Hurling was more or less an exception, to feature an interesting sport and I would not use it as a precedent in this case. --''' +++$+++ : I am still not really enthousiastic to have it on ITN... Opposition is quite strong at ITN/C as well. Hurling was more or less an exception, to feature an interesting sport and I would not use it as a precedent in this case. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:18, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

9671 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-04 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.212630960E09 +++$+++ Witch trials in Poland were not common due to above average religious tolerance (see [[Warsaw confederation]]), but there were some, and the subject is notable. I could point you to some reliable Polish sources (authors: 1) Ma\u0142gorzata Pilaszek from 1990s-2000s, ex. ''Procesy czarownic w Polsce XVI-XVIII wieku'' [http:\/\/nauka.opi.org.pl\/raporty\/opisy\/synaba\/131000\/sn131538.htm doctoral thesis], [http:\/\/www.mowiawieki.pl\/artykul.html?id_artykul=208 article in popular history magazine], [http:\/\/www.slady.pl\/artykul.php?art=154 another article] [http:\/\/www.slady.pl\/artykul.php?art=152 follow up to her article] 2) Bohdan Baranowski from 1950s-1960s, ex. ''Procesy czarownic w Polsce w XVII i XVII wieku'' (book) 3) Szymon Wrzesi\u0144ski, ''Wsp\xf3lniczki szatana. Czarownice na ziemiach polskich'' (book) 2006. ) 3) Piotr Byczkowski's master thesis on witch trials in Poland, [http:\/\/www.historia1.terramail.pl\/magisterki\/piotr_byczkowski\/]]) 4) Joanna \u017bak-Bucholc [http:\/\/www.racjonalista.pl\/kk.php\/s,87 Czary i stosy w Polsce]. 5) [http:\/\/www.law.uni.torun.pl\/_upload\/pliki\/historiaprocesuwdawnejpolsce.pdf Here] is an academic work with a para on bibliography of the subject: W. Korcz, Procesy czarownic w Zielonej G\xf3rze w XVII w., Rocznik Lubelski 1959, t. I; B. Baranowski, Najdawniejsze procesy o czary w Kaliszu, Archiwum Etnograficzne, t. 2, Lublin 1951; ten\u017ce, Procesy czarownic w Polsce w XVII i XVIII w., \u0141\xf3d\u017a 1952; ten\u017ce, Po\u017cegnanie z diab\u0142em i czarownic\u0105, \u0141\xf3d\u017a 1965; J. Rosenblatt, Czarownica powo\u0142ana, Warszawa 1883; K. Kaczmarczyk, Procesy o czarostwo w r. 1688 i 1689, Lud VII, 1908; ten\u017ce, Przyczynek do proces\xf3w o czary oraz Dwa procesy o czary z 1684 r.. Lud XXIV, 1925; K. Koranyi, Beczka czarownic, Lud XXVII, 1928; ten\u017ce, Czary w post\u0119powaniu s\u0105dowym, Lud XXV, 1925; J. Tazbir, Procesy o czary, Odrodzenie i Reformacja w Polsce, t. 23, 1978; M. Pilaszek, Procesy czarownic w Polsce w XVI \u2013 XVIII w. Nowe aspekty. Uwagi na marginesie pracy B. Baranowskiego, Odrodzenie i Reformacja w Polsce, t. 42, 1998; J. Rabianin, Jeszcze o czrach i gus\u0142ach w dawnym Lublinie, Lublin 1936. Out of those I'd recommend work by [[Janusz Tazbir]], he is one of the best Polish historians of the era. Oh, and of course there is a little at Polish wikipedia ([http:\/\/pl.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Procesy_o_czary#Ostatni_proces_w_Polsce]). In other words, there is a lot of material; usually I'd stub it myself but I am a bit busy now so there may be some delay. Unless you know Polish language and can use the above sources for yourse, you could request the article at [[WP:PWNB]] or wait till I find time and will to do it. PS. I also assume you have tried [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?q=witch+trials+in+Poland&btnG=Search+Books this] and [http:\/\/scholar.google.pl\/scholar?q=witch+trials+in+Poland&hl=pl&lr=&btnG=Szukaj this]. PSS. Try [[WP:RD]] and ask Clio if you need a stub, her answers usually are pretty good :) --<sub><span style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Witch trials in Poland were not common due to above average religious tolerance (see [[Warsaw confederation]]), but there were some, and the subject is notable. I could point you to some reliable Polish sources (authors: 1) Małgorzata Pilaszek from 1990s-2000s, ex. ''Procesy czarownic w Polsce XVI-XVIII wieku'' [http://nauka.opi.org.pl/raporty/opisy/synaba/131000/sn131538.htm doctoral thesis], [http://www.mowiawieki.pl/artykul.html?id_artykul=208 article in popular history magazine], [http://www.slady.pl/artykul.php?art=154 another article] [http://www.slady.pl/artykul.php?art=152 follow up to her article] 2) Bohdan Baranowski from 1950s-1960s, ex. ''Procesy czarownic w Polsce w XVII i XVII wieku'' (book) 3) Szymon Wrzesiński, ''Wspólniczki szatana. Czarownice na ziemiach polskich'' (book) 2006. ) 3) Piotr Byczkowski's master thesis on witch trials in Poland, [http://www.historia1.terramail.pl/magisterki/piotr_byczkowski/]]) 4) Joanna Żak-Bucholc [http://www.racjonalista.pl/kk.php/s,87 Czary i stosy w Polsce]. 5) [http://www.law.uni.torun.pl/_upload/pliki/historiaprocesuwdawnejpolsce.pdf Here] is an academic work with a para on bibliography of the subject: W. Korcz, Procesy czarownic w Zielonej Górze w XVII w., Rocznik Lubelski 1959, t. I; B. Baranowski, Najdawniejsze procesy o czary w Kaliszu, Archiwum Etnograficzne, t. 2, Lublin 1951; tenże, Procesy czarownic w Polsce w XVII i XVIII w., Łódź 1952; tenże, Pożegnanie z diabłem i czarownicą, Łódź 1965; J. Rosenblatt, Czarownica powołana, Warszawa 1883; K. Kaczmarczyk, Procesy o czarostwo w r. 1688 i 1689, Lud VII, 1908; tenże, Przyczynek do procesów o czary oraz Dwa procesy o czary z 1684 r.. Lud XXIV, 1925; K. Koranyi, Beczka czarownic, Lud XXVII, 1928; tenże, Czary w postępowaniu sądowym, Lud XXV, 1925; J. Tazbir, Procesy o czary, Odrodzenie i Reformacja w Polsce, t. 23, 1978; M. Pilaszek, Procesy czarownic w Polsce w XVI – XVIII w. Nowe aspekty. Uwagi na marginesie pracy B. Baranowskiego, Odrodzenie i Reformacja w Polsce, t. 42, 1998; J. Rabianin, Jeszcze o czrach i gusłach w dawnym Lublinie, Lublin 1936. Out of those I'd recommend work by [[Janusz Tazbir]], he is one of the best Polish historians of the era. Oh, and of course there is a little at Polish wikipedia ([http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procesy_o_czary#Ostatni_proces_w_Polsce]). In other words, there is a lot of material; usually I'd stub it myself but I am a bit busy now so there may be some delay. Unless you know Polish language and can use the above sources for yourse, you could request the article at [[WP:PWNB]] or wait till I find time and will to do it. PS. I also assume you have tried [http://books.google.com/books?q=witch+trials+in+Poland&btnG=Search+Books this] and [http://scholar.google.pl/scholar?q=witch+trials+in+Poland&hl=pl&lr=&btnG=Szukaj this]. PSS. Try [[WP:RD]] and ask Clio if you need a stub, her answers usually are pretty good :) --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 18:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
9672 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9671 +++$+++ 9671 +++$+++ 2008-06-05 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.212699420E09 +++$+++ Is there a template\/category for which trials by country? Could you give us (at PWNB) some examples of related existing articles? --<sub><span style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Is there a template/category for which trials by country? Could you give us (at PWNB) some examples of related existing articles? --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 13:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

533960 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-23 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.253773800E09 +++$+++ I have expanded [[2009 Bhutan earthquake]]. Is it better now? --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ I have expanded [[2009 Bhutan earthquake]]. Is it better now? --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 23:30, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
533961 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533960 +++$+++ 533960 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.253775720E09 +++$+++ Never mind. Posted now. --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ :Never mind. Posted now. --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 00:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

271818 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271818 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-20 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.300622880E09 +++$+++ Could I ask you to have a look at what I said [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Impact_of_the_2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami_on_the_video_game_industry&diff=419748962&oldid=419748562 here]? I think your comment there was unnecessary, and I am asking you as a show of good faith to please consider retracting it (using strike-out tags: <nowiki><s><\/s><\/nowiki>). Whatever else you may think of Colonel Warden, I don't think this nomination is an example of the sort of behaviour you think you have seen elsewhere, and your raising this is not helpful here.  +++$+++ Could I ask you to have a look at what I said [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Impact_of_the_2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami_on_the_video_game_industry&diff=419748962&oldid=419748562 here]? I think your comment there was unnecessary, and I am asking you as a show of good faith to please consider retracting it (using strike-out tags: <nowiki><s></s></nowiki>). Whatever else you may think of Colonel Warden, I don't think this nomination is an example of the sort of behaviour you think you have seen elsewhere, and your raising this is not helpful here. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 05:08, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
271819 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271818 +++$+++ 271818 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.300670460E09 +++$+++ Thank-you. Much appreciated.  +++$+++ :Thank-you. Much appreciated. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 18:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

45303 +++$+++ Onefortyone +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-11 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.271031060E09 +++$+++ This shows that Rodriguez was certainly right with his opinion, and for reasons of balance, his statement should be included in the Sullivan article.  +++$+++ This shows that Rodriguez was certainly right with his opinion, and for reasons of balance, his statement should be included in the Sullivan article. [[User:Onefortyone|Onefortyone]] ([[User talk:Onefortyone|talk]]) 17:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
45304 +++$+++ Onefortyone +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45303 +++$+++ 45303 +++$+++ 2010-04-13 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.271216220E09 +++$+++ Interestingly, some months ago, while removing the same commentary from the Elvis article, you said that Rodriguez\u2019 opinion about a fleeting facial expression is \u201ca clever, intriguing, plausible observation.\u201d See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Elvis_Presley&diff=335609705&oldid=335609550]. So would you please explain to me why this \u201cclever, intriguing, plausible observation\u201d should not be included in the article on the Ed Sullivan Show, especially in view of the fact that it demonstrates, for reasons of balance, that Sullivan\u2019s words weren\u2019t honest. If there is another source which shows that Sullivan\u2019s words were indeed sincere, you may also add this opinion to the article.  +++$+++ :Interestingly, some months ago, while removing the same commentary from the Elvis article, you said that Rodriguez’ opinion about a fleeting facial expression is “a clever, intriguing, plausible observation.” See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elvis_Presley&diff=335609705&oldid=335609550]. So would you please explain to me why this “clever, intriguing, plausible observation” should not be included in the article on the Ed Sullivan Show, especially in view of the fact that it demonstrates, for reasons of balance, that Sullivan’s words weren’t honest. If there is another source which shows that Sullivan’s words were indeed sincere, you may also add this opinion to the article. [[User:Onefortyone|Onefortyone]] ([[User talk:Onefortyone|talk]]) 20:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

9676 +++$+++ Frania Wisniewska +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-31 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.230778920E09 +++$+++ Aciram:  Thank you for the above comment.  I do not agree with English language wikipedia as to its  17th century-19th century judgment of women.  In France, the 17th & 18th centuries (except for the years Mme de Maintenon reigned over the morals at Versailles), and the beginning of the 19th were not a time of puritanism.  The morals at Court & in higher classes of society were rather loose & women having romantic affairs with men other than their husband were not considered to be *prostitutes*!  From the bourgeoisie on up to the royal family (even in lower class families where parents wanted their daughter to \"faire un bon mariage\", i.e. marry someone rich), marriages were pre-arranged *business deals* from which love was excluded.  This was bound to lead to latter *love affairs* when two persons happened to meet & fall in love.  One day when I have have time, I am going to remove many names from that ghetto-like '''Category:French courtesans and prostitutes''' http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Category:French_courtesans_and_prostitutes.   +++$+++ Aciram:  Thank you for the above comment.  I do not agree with English language wikipedia as to its  17th century-19th century judgment of women.  In France, the 17th & 18th centuries (except for the years Mme de Maintenon reigned over the morals at Versailles), and the beginning of the 19th were not a time of puritanism.  The morals at Court & in higher classes of society were rather loose & women having romantic affairs with men other than their husband were not considered to be *prostitutes*!  From the bourgeoisie on up to the royal family (even in lower class families where parents wanted their daughter to "faire un bon mariage", i.e. marry someone rich), marriages were pre-arranged *business deals* from which love was excluded.  This was bound to lead to latter *love affairs* when two persons happened to meet & fall in love.  One day when I have have time, I am going to remove many names from that ghetto-like '''Category:French courtesans and prostitutes''' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:French_courtesans_and_prostitutes.  [[User:Frania Wisniewska|Frania W.]] ([[User talk:Frania Wisniewska|talk]]) 19:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
9677 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9676 +++$+++ 9676 +++$+++ 2008-12-31 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.230781080E09 +++$+++ Yes, I understand. I agree with you in what you say about the weiv on sexuality in 18th century France. I was in fact also talking about the matter in general, the view on this in Europe in general; also, for example, an 19th century English actress, who had affairs, could be considered to be a prostitute, even if she was not: she could be described as such by her time, and therefore categorized as such in wikipedia, when the article is based upon such sources and tradition. I wish you good luck in adjusting this, and hope that you will also remove such wrongful labels from women of all nationalities as you find them, as I have done myself. I am glad if this puritanical wiev could be corrected toward a more neutral point of view. - +++$+++ :Yes, I understand. I agree with you in what you say about the weiv on sexuality in 18th century France. I was in fact also talking about the matter in general, the view on this in Europe in general; also, for example, an 19th century English actress, who had affairs, could be considered to be a prostitute, even if she was not: she could be described as such by her time, and therefore categorized as such in wikipedia, when the article is based upon such sources and tradition. I wish you good luck in adjusting this, and hope that you will also remove such wrongful labels from women of all nationalities as you find them, as I have done myself. I am glad if this puritanical wiev could be corrected toward a more neutral point of view. -[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram#top|talk]]) 19:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

271822 +++$+++ MauchoEagle +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-26 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.303801440E09 +++$+++ Don't you think it is a good idea that you put in a request for rollback permissions. It would be most useful considering the vandalism situation going on at that article you have contributed so much to. Also you may want to downgrade your request at [[WP:RFPP]] to semi-protection not full-protection. ''<font face=\"times new roman\"> +++$+++ Don't you think it is a good idea that you put in a request for rollback permissions. It would be most useful considering the vandalism situation going on at that article you have contributed so much to. Also you may want to downgrade your request at [[WP:RFPP]] to semi-protection not full-protection. ''<font face="times new roman">[[User:MauchoEagle|<span style="background:#91A3B0;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">maucho</span>]][[User talk:MauchoEagle|<span style="background:#666;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">eagle</span>]]</font>'' <sub><font color="blue">([[Special:Contributions/MauchoEagle|c]])</font></sub> 00:04, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
271823 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271822 +++$+++ 271822 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.303807860E09 +++$+++ I use Twinkle. I am not one of the 5800 or so rollbackers on WP.  +++$+++ :I use Twinkle. I am not one of the 5800 or so rollbackers on WP. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 01:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
271824 +++$+++ MauchoEagle +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271822 +++$+++ 271823 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.303808160E09 +++$+++ No, I meant that I think you shoul become a rollbacker. You have a lot of experience. As far as I can see you wont abuse the tool. ''<font face=\"times new roman\"> +++$+++ ::No, I meant that I think you shoul become a rollbacker. You have a lot of experience. As far as I can see you wont abuse the tool. ''<font face="times new roman">[[User:MauchoEagle|<span style="background:#91A3B0;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">maucho</span>]][[User talk:MauchoEagle|<span style="background:#666;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">eagle</span>]]</font>'' <sub><font color="blue">([[Special:Contributions/MauchoEagle|c]])</font></sub> 01:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

9679 +++$+++ Jarry1250 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-19 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.232416140E09 +++$+++ You might notice that using AWB I've recently made edits to quite a number of your articles. Really, I just needed a good list of articles to help, and your contribs seemed like that good sort of list. -  +++$+++ You might notice that using AWB I've recently made edits to quite a number of your articles. Really, I just needed a good list of articles to help, and your contribs seemed like that good sort of list. - [[User:Jarry1250|Jarry1250]] <sup>([[User_talk:Jarry1250|t]], [[Special:Contributions/Jarry1250|c]])</sup> 17:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
9680 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9679 +++$+++ 9679 +++$+++ 2009-01-19 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.232433240E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, I am not offended at all, and I know it's not personal. My articles obviously needed to be improoved, and I am only glad that they have been! Keep up the good work! -- +++$+++ :Don't worry, I am not offended at all, and I know it's not personal. My articles obviously needed to be improoved, and I am only glad that they have been! Keep up the good work! --[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram#top|talk]]) 22:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

9681 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-06 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.236392820E09 +++$+++ Hi! I've just done a bit of editing on [[Cath\xe9rine Charlotte De la Gardie]], most of which you wrote.  There's one phrase I need your help figuring out. You write that \"thirteen women and five men were accused of child abduction to Satan.\"  The phrase \"child abduction to Satan\" isn't idiomatic, and I'd rewrite it if I were sure what it meant. Does it mean they were \"accused of abducting children and sacrificing them to Satan\"? \"accused of abducting children in Satan's name\"? \"accused of abducting children at Satan's behest\"?  \"accused of abducting children at Satan's command\"? \"accused of abducting children and presenting them to Satan\"? Or something else?? - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ Hi! I've just done a bit of editing on [[Cathérine Charlotte De la Gardie]], most of which you wrote.  There's one phrase I need your help figuring out. You write that "thirteen women and five men were accused of child abduction to Satan."  The phrase "child abduction to Satan" isn't idiomatic, and I'd rewrite it if I were sure what it meant. Does it mean they were "accused of abducting children and sacrificing them to Satan"? "accused of abducting children in Satan's name"? "accused of abducting children at Satan's behest"?  "accused of abducting children at Satan's command"? "accused of abducting children and presenting them to Satan"? Or something else?? - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 18:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
9682 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9681 +++$+++ 9681 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.236400260E09 +++$+++ Of course. In Swedish witch trials, the alleged witches were often accused not of magic, but rather of abducting children to the [[witches sabbath]] of Satan. I hope that was of any help. I am glad my article is appreciated. -- +++$+++ :Of course. In Swedish witch trials, the alleged witches were often accused not of magic, but rather of abducting children to the [[witches sabbath]] of Satan. I hope that was of any help. I am glad my article is appreciated. --[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram#top|talk]]) 20:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
9683 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9681 +++$+++ 9682 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.236400500E09 +++$+++ Yes, I enjoyed the article and learned some rather interesting things from it. Please have a look to be sure I haven't ruined it :) - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ ::Yes, I enjoyed the article and learned some rather interesting things from it. Please have a look to be sure I haven't ruined it :) - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 20:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
9684 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9681 +++$+++ 9683 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.236400920E09 +++$+++ Your edits were excellent! I always welcome editing of my articles, as I am aware of the fact that English is not my birth language. -- +++$+++ :::Your edits were excellent! I always welcome editing of my articles, as I am aware of the fact that English is not my birth language. --[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram#top|talk]]) 20:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

271826 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271826 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-29 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.306670280E09 +++$+++ To add the space, a redirect needs to be removed under CSD G6. Can this be done for me? Seen in new pages patrol.  +++$+++ To add the space, a redirect needs to be removed under CSD G6. Can this be done for me? Seen in new pages patrol. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 04:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
271827 +++$+++ Feezo +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271826 +++$+++ 271826 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.306673700E09 +++$+++ {{done}}. <span style=\"font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;\" color=\"#BBAED0\"> +++$+++ :{{done}}. <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;" color="#BBAED0">[[User:Feezo|Feezo]] <font size="-2">[[User_talk:Feezo|(send a signal]] | [[Special:Contributions/Feezo|watch the sky]])</font></span> 05:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

9685 +++$+++ Kleinzach +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-15 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.239813960E09 +++$+++ Hi. I see you just edited [[Inga \xc5berg]] an article that you started in 2007. May I ask if you are Swedish? If so I am wondering if you could help with some articles about historic singers that have a few problems? Best regards. --'' +++$+++ Hi. I see you just edited [[Inga Åberg]] an article that you started in 2007. May I ask if you are Swedish? If so I am wondering if you could help with some articles about historic singers that have a few problems? Best regards. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 09:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
9686 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9685 +++$+++ 9685 +++$+++ 2009-04-15 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.239827460E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your note on my talk page. I started the article of [[Inga \xc5berg]] - and others similar - when I was new in Wikipedia. Looking at them now, I know they do have their faults. My field is Women\xb4s history, and I have written several articles of women in history from the Scandinavian countries. I am not an expert on the productions within opera, theatre and ballet, but I do have some knowledge about the history of these fields in Scandinavia. I do not have much time on my hands, but I you have anything in particular to ask regarding these articles, then feel free to do so, and I will anser to the best of my ability and time. Regards-- +++$+++ :Thank you for your note on my talk page. I started the article of [[Inga Åberg]] - and others similar - when I was new in Wikipedia. Looking at them now, I know they do have their faults. My field is Women´s history, and I have written several articles of women in history from the Scandinavian countries. I am not an expert on the productions within opera, theatre and ballet, but I do have some knowledge about the history of these fields in Scandinavia. I do not have much time on my hands, but I you have anything in particular to ask regarding these articles, then feel free to do so, and I will anser to the best of my ability and time. Regards--[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram|talk]]) 13:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
9687 +++$+++ Kleinzach +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9685 +++$+++ 9686 +++$+++ 2009-04-15 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.239862620E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately Swedish titles of French works don't mean anything to English readers. We need to give the original French titles - and wikify the original Swedish ones. There's a lot more but maybe we can start here? Thanks. --'' +++$+++ ::Unfortunately Swedish titles of French works don't mean anything to English readers. We need to give the original French titles - and wikify the original Swedish ones. There's a lot more but maybe we can start here? Thanks. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 23:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

533975 +++$+++ TerriersFan +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533975 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-26 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.254034140E09 +++$+++ Hi, will you please take a second look at this close? I identified a number of references that would meet the sourcing concern. Even the nominator acknowledged that they were sufficient to support a stub after the unencyclopaedic list of successes was removed. The only other contributor simply failed to address the sources that I found and made a generalised statement without considering the pros and cons of the notability of ''this'' group of people. I think that this should have been a 'no consensus' at worst.  +++$+++ Hi, will you please take a second look at this close? I identified a number of references that would meet the sourcing concern. Even the nominator acknowledged that they were sufficient to support a stub after the unencyclopaedic list of successes was removed. The only other contributor simply failed to address the sources that I found and made a generalised statement without considering the pros and cons of the notability of ''this'' group of people. I think that this should have been a 'no consensus' at worst. [[User:TerriersFan|TerriersFan]] ([[User talk:TerriersFan|talk]]) 23:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
533976 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533975 +++$+++ 533975 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.254080520E09 +++$+++ Ok, that sounds reasonable. Since you're an admin as well, could you take care of the article? Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, that sounds reasonable. Since you're an admin as well, could you take care of the article? Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

9688 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-23 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.243122960E09 +++$+++ Hi, those tags are to indicate where the corresponding article is featured in another language and has content that is worth translating or including. Since the scope of the project doesn't include non-featured articles, where the corresponding article is not featured I remove the tags. (Or occcasionally I replace it with something like {{tl|Expand Swedish}} that doesn't assume the article is featured.)  +++$+++ Hi, those tags are to indicate where the corresponding article is featured in another language and has content that is worth translating or including. Since the scope of the project doesn't include non-featured articles, where the corresponding article is not featured I remove the tags. (Or occcasionally I replace it with something like {{tl|Expand Swedish}} that doesn't assume the article is featured.) [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|talk]]) 16:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
9689 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9688 +++$+++ 9688 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.243123500E09 +++$+++ The new tags place things in the category [[:Category:Articles needing translation from Swedish Wikipedia]] and the subcategory [[:Category:Featured articles needing translation from Swedish Wikipedia]]. If you're ever looking for new articles to translate, good requests can be found in those two categories.  +++$+++ :The new tags place things in the category [[:Category:Articles needing translation from Swedish Wikipedia]] and the subcategory [[:Category:Featured articles needing translation from Swedish Wikipedia]]. If you're ever looking for new articles to translate, good requests can be found in those two categories. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|talk]]) 17:05, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
9690 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9688 +++$+++ 9689 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.243123800E09 +++$+++ Actually now I have a question for you! I see that you originally placed the FAOL template (and that it was not placed--like many others--as a part of the huge FAOL-template-placing project years ago). Why did you put it there? To indicate that a sv.wiki article existed? To do that, an interwiki link is better (which I see you also applied). If you were doing it to indicate that you translated from the sv.wiki article, the best practice is probably to apply the template {{tl|Translated}} (see the template page for instructions).  +++$+++ ::Actually now I have a question for you! I see that you originally placed the FAOL template (and that it was not placed--like many others--as a part of the huge FAOL-template-placing project years ago). Why did you put it there? To indicate that a sv.wiki article existed? To do that, an interwiki link is better (which I see you also applied). If you were doing it to indicate that you translated from the sv.wiki article, the best practice is probably to apply the template {{tl|Translated}} (see the template page for instructions). [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|talk]]) 17:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

533977 +++$+++ TParis00ap +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-27 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.254100860E09 +++$+++ Hello.  You closed this AfD as a redirect to itself.  I fixed the article to redirect to [[Crimeface]], but I haven't touched the AfD.-- +++$+++ Hello.  You closed this AfD as a redirect to itself.  I fixed the article to redirect to [[Crimeface]], but I haven't touched the AfD.--[[User:TParis00ap|TParis00ap]] ([[User talk:TParis00ap|talk]]) 18:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
533978 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533977 +++$+++ 533977 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.254112200E09 +++$+++ Wow. Thanks for noticing. Fixed now. --''' +++$+++ : Wow. Thanks for noticing. Fixed now. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
533979 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533977 +++$+++ 533977 +++$+++ 2009-10-10 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.255239720E09 +++$+++ Hi. Well, I see that you've started already so I suppose my help is no longer needed ;-) Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Well, I see that you've started already so I suppose my help is no longer needed ;-) Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:42, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

9691 +++$+++ Mariah-Yulia +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9691 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-12 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.244868900E09 +++$+++ In the [[Christina Ingesdotter of Sweden]] wiki article you claimed that she was a Russian princess when in fact she was a princess of [[Kievan Rus']]. Kievan Rus' is something else then Russia, just like the [[Roman Empire]] is not [[Italy]]. I hope you will be more careful in the future. \u2014  +++$+++ In the [[Christina Ingesdotter of Sweden]] wiki article you claimed that she was a Russian princess when in fact she was a princess of [[Kievan Rus']]. Kievan Rus' is something else then Russia, just like the [[Roman Empire]] is not [[Italy]]. I hope you will be more careful in the future. — [[User:Mariah-Yulia|Mariah-Yulia]] ([[User talk:Mariah-Yulia|talk]]) 21:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
9692 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9691 +++$+++ 9691 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.244871480E09 +++$+++ Of course! I am a little embarrassed about that mistake, actually, and can only blame it on simple carelessness. I am glad you corrected it! I have also corrected it even more: as she died before her spouse became Grand Prince of Kiev, it seems that she was in fact princess consort of Novgorod, Rostov and other cities, if I have understoond it correctly. Please feel free to correct whenever you have more information! -- +++$+++ :Of course! I am a little embarrassed about that mistake, actually, and can only blame it on simple carelessness. I am glad you corrected it! I have also corrected it even more: as she died before her spouse became Grand Prince of Kiev, it seems that she was in fact princess consort of Novgorod, Rostov and other cities, if I have understoond it correctly. Please feel free to correct whenever you have more information! --[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram#top|talk]]) 22:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

533980 +++$+++ Colonel Warden +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-15 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.255667460E09 +++$+++ Your deletion of this list seems improper, as there was no consensus for this and the action was contrary to our guideline [[WP:CLS]].  Also, the discussion had just been relisted - indicating a lack of consensus - and was active.  Please reconsider.  +++$+++ Your deletion of this list seems improper, as there was no consensus for this and the action was contrary to our guideline [[WP:CLS]].  Also, the discussion had just been relisted - indicating a lack of consensus - and was active.  Please reconsider. [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 21:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
533981 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 2009-10-16 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.255699980E09 +++$+++ Ok, I am fine if you put the article back to AfD. --''' +++$+++ * Ok, I am fine if you put the article back to AfD. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 06:33, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
533982 +++$+++ Uncle G +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 533981 +++$+++ 2009-10-17 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.255817160E09 +++$+++ Colonel Warden is not an administrator, and cannot undelete the article for re-listing.  Xe has come to me for help.  I don't want to step on any toes here.  Are you happy to re-open and re-list for further consideration?   +++$+++ ** Colonel Warden is not an administrator, and cannot undelete the article for re-listing.  Xe has come to me for help.  I don't want to step on any toes here.  Are you happy to re-open and re-list for further consideration?  [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 15:06, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
533983 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 533982 +++$+++ 2009-10-17 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.255820580E09 +++$+++ Oops, I must have missed he's not admin... No problem with relisting from my side. Can you do it or shall I? --''' +++$+++ *** Oops, I must have missed he's not admin... No problem with relisting from my side. Can you do it or shall I? --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:03, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
533984 +++$+++ Uncle G +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 533983 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.256236080E09 +++$+++ Better that you do, I think.  +++$+++ **** Better that you do, I think. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 11:28, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
533985 +++$+++ Colonel Warden +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.256522040E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for relisting this.  +++$+++ * Many thanks for relisting this. [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 18:54, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
533986 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 2009-10-18 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.255891200E09 +++$+++ Well, in that case it should be easy to find enough 3rd party sources to add to the article - lack of those was one of the reasons why it got deleted. Maybe it's better to start writing from beginning or if you want, I can provide you the old content. Let me know. --''' +++$+++ : Well, in that case it should be easy to find enough 3rd party sources to add to the article - lack of those was one of the reasons why it got deleted. Maybe it's better to start writing from beginning or if you want, I can provide you the old content. Let me know. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:40, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
533987 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 2009-10-19 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.255987560E09 +++$+++ It is redundant there as well, same reasoning ;-) Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : It is redundant there as well, same reasoning ;-) Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:26, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
533988 +++$+++ Proger +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 533987 +++$+++ 2009-10-19 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.255993440E09 +++$+++ But why? :) I think, this is not :) -- +++$+++ :: But why? :) I think, this is not :) --[[User:Proger|Proger]] ([[User talk:Proger|talk]]) 16:04, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
533989 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 533988 +++$+++ 2009-10-19 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.255993800E09 +++$+++ Well, it is basically duplicating the information. Countries articles all have a map in the infobox and all the surrounding countries listed in the introduction (with geographical position). Besides, the template occupies disproportionally big amount of place in the article... --''' +++$+++ ::: Well, it is basically duplicating the information. Countries articles all have a map in the infobox and all the surrounding countries listed in the introduction (with geographical position). Besides, the template occupies disproportionally big amount of place in the article... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
533990 +++$+++ Proger +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533980 +++$+++ 533989 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.256153760E09 +++$+++ O`kay. Thank you :)-- +++$+++ :::: O`kay. Thank you :)--[[User:Proger|Proger]] ([[User talk:Proger|talk]]) 12:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

271839 +++$+++  PhillieLWillie +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-16 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.250460300E09 +++$+++ <div class=\"floatleft\" style=\"margin-bottom:0\">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]<\/div>An article that you have been involved in editing, [[List of The Secret Show episodes]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]].  If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/{{str trim|List of The Secret Show episodes}}]].  Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw -->   +++$+++ <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, [[List of The Secret Show episodes]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]].  If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/{{str trim|List of The Secret Show episodes}}]].  Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw -->  [[User: PhillieLWillie|PhillieLWillie]]([[User talk: PhillieLWillie|Talk]]) 15:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
271840 +++$+++  PhillieLWillie +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271839 +++$+++ 271839 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.250460480E09 +++$+++ Sorry that I can't create a new section. My computer is having difficulties.  +++$+++ :Sorry that I can't create a new section. My computer is having difficulties. [[User: PhillieLWillie|PhillieLWillie]]([[User talk: PhillieLWillie|Talk]]) 15:08, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

9696 +++$+++ Asarelah +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9696 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-25 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.245972240E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome. You make good contributions, and I'd hate to see them removed. Dreamguy seemed to be concerned that the Fisherwife and Hans the Werewolf were tortured to make them confess, it might satisfy his concerns if you clarified that in the articles. If there is nothing in your sources to indicate that torture was used, you may want to mention that on the AFD discussions. I'll go over the articles and fix any problems I see regarding the English language. I know how cruel English can be to a non-native speaker, and I'm always impressed when people learn it, even when they don't speak it perfectly.  +++$+++ You're very welcome. You make good contributions, and I'd hate to see them removed. Dreamguy seemed to be concerned that the Fisherwife and Hans the Werewolf were tortured to make them confess, it might satisfy his concerns if you clarified that in the articles. If there is nothing in your sources to indicate that torture was used, you may want to mention that on the AFD discussions. I'll go over the articles and fix any problems I see regarding the English language. I know how cruel English can be to a non-native speaker, and I'm always impressed when people learn it, even when they don't speak it perfectly. [[User:Asarelah|Asarelah]] ([[User talk:Asarelah|talk]]) 16:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
9697 +++$+++ Asarelah +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9696 +++$+++ 9696 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.246406160E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Its mainly just some grammar and phrasing issues. I understand it fine, but apparently Dreamguy is much more nit-picky.   +++$+++ :You're welcome. Its mainly just some grammar and phrasing issues. I understand it fine, but apparently Dreamguy is much more nit-picky.  [[User:Asarelah|Asarelah]] ([[User talk:Asarelah|talk]]) 16:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
9698 +++$+++ Asarelah +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9696 +++$+++ 9697 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.246407180E09 +++$+++ I also added some hidden comments on the Fisherwife article that can only be seen when the edit tab is clicked. Its mostly requests for clarification that would improve the article greatly. I'll come back and work on it some more and also check over the Werewolf article and add more hidden comments in areas that need to be clarified.  +++$+++ ::I also added some hidden comments on the Fisherwife article that can only be seen when the edit tab is clicked. Its mostly requests for clarification that would improve the article greatly. I'll come back and work on it some more and also check over the Werewolf article and add more hidden comments in areas that need to be clarified. [[User:Asarelah|Asarelah]] ([[User talk:Asarelah|talk]]) 17:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

9699 +++$+++ Atama +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-25 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.245996120E09 +++$+++ Hello Aciram, I noticed that you mentioned reservations about commenting on an AfD discussion for an article you created. I wanted to assure you that such reservations are completely unnecessary; on the contrary, your input is probably the most valuable in such discussions. On the [[WP:AFD|AfD]] guideline page, it is strongly recommended that the person who nominates an article for deletion put notifications on the page of the article creator and significant contributors to give them a chance to provide their input. This is partially because they should have a chance to justify the work they have done, and also because they may have an insight into the subject that other editors may not. In addition, if a change to the article is suggested they would likely take part since they've already been editing the article. So please don't hesitate to do so in the future, your presence in those discussions is very much appropriate. Thanks! -- ''' +++$+++ Hello Aciram, I noticed that you mentioned reservations about commenting on an AfD discussion for an article you created. I wanted to assure you that such reservations are completely unnecessary; on the contrary, your input is probably the most valuable in such discussions. On the [[WP:AFD|AfD]] guideline page, it is strongly recommended that the person who nominates an article for deletion put notifications on the page of the article creator and significant contributors to give them a chance to provide their input. This is partially because they should have a chance to justify the work they have done, and also because they may have an insight into the subject that other editors may not. In addition, if a change to the article is suggested they would likely take part since they've already been editing the article. So please don't hesitate to do so in the future, your presence in those discussions is very much appropriate. Thanks! -- '''[[User:Atama|<span style="color:#06F">At</span><span style="color:#03B">am</span><span style="color:#006">a</span>]][[User talk:Atama|<sup><span style="color:#000">chat</span></sup>]]''' 23:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
9700 +++$+++ Atama +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9699 +++$+++ 9699 +++$+++ 2009-06-29 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.246319040E09 +++$+++ You're correct that if the problems are unresolved that the discussion can conclude with a deletion. However, the article itself doesn't have to be \"fixed\", there just needs to be a consensus that the article can and will be fixed. That counts as \"resolved\". I can't tell the future but I suspect that unless more people come into the discussions with firm objections to the articles that they would pass as \"keep\".  Thanks! -- ''' +++$+++ : You're correct that if the problems are unresolved that the discussion can conclude with a deletion. However, the article itself doesn't have to be "fixed", there just needs to be a consensus that the article can and will be fixed. That counts as "resolved". I can't tell the future but I suspect that unless more people come into the discussions with firm objections to the articles that they would pass as "keep".  Thanks! -- '''[[User:Atama|<span style="color:#06F">At</span><span style="color:#03B">am</span><span style="color:#006">a</span>]][[User talk:Atama|<sup><span style="color:#000">chat</span></sup>]]''' 16:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

533991 +++$+++ Axl +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-19 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.255963860E09 +++$+++ Hi, Tone. You [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/2160p|recently closed the AfD]] for [[2160p]]. [[User:GraYoshi2x|GraYoshi2x]] has changed it to a redirect.  +++$+++ Hi, Tone. You [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2160p|recently closed the AfD]] for [[2160p]]. [[User:GraYoshi2x|GraYoshi2x]] has changed it to a redirect. [[User:Axl|<font color="#808000">'''Axl'''</font>]] <font color="#3CB371">¤</font> <small>[[User talk:Axl|<font color="#808000">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 07:51, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
533992 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533991 +++$+++ 533991 +++$+++ 2009-10-19 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.255987560E09 +++$+++ Hi. This is an editorial issue, AfD outcome is not really relevant here. If you feel the article needs to be brought back, just revert the redirect. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. This is an editorial issue, AfD outcome is not really relevant here. If you feel the article needs to be brought back, just revert the redirect. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:26, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
533993 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533991 +++$+++ 533991 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.256158020E09 +++$+++ Nope, that wiki is not a part of Wikipedia. I suggest you start the article from scratch so that there will be no problems with copyright. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Nope, that wiki is not a part of Wikipedia. I suggest you start the article from scratch so that there will be no problems with copyright. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:47, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

9706 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-28 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.254185700E09 +++$+++ Good work today Aciram on two of our Queens by the name of Richeza in English and Rikissa in Swedish! But let's be totally consistent and rename the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Richeza_of_Denmark last one] you did ''Richeza of Denmark, Queen of Sweden'' so she matches the others perfectly. Thx!  +++$+++ Good work today Aciram on two of our Queens by the name of Richeza in English and Rikissa in Swedish! But let's be totally consistent and rename the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richeza_of_Denmark last one] you did ''Richeza of Denmark, Queen of Sweden'' so she matches the others perfectly. Thx! [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 17:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
9707 +++$+++ Surtsicna +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9706 +++$+++ 9706 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.254190380E09 +++$+++ The queenly title is neccessary only when more than one princess of a certain country bore the same name. There were three Polish princesses named Richeza, so the titles had to be [[Richeza of Poland, Queen of Sweden]], [[Richeza of Poland, Queen of Castile]] and [[Richeza of Poland, Queen of Hungary]]. Since this Richeza was the only Richeza of Denmark, the current title is just fine. We should avoid long, clumsy titles; eg. [[Catherine of Aragon]] is much better than [[Catherine of Aragon, Queen of England]].  +++$+++ :The queenly title is neccessary only when more than one princess of a certain country bore the same name. There were three Polish princesses named Richeza, so the titles had to be [[Richeza of Poland, Queen of Sweden]], [[Richeza of Poland, Queen of Castile]] and [[Richeza of Poland, Queen of Hungary]]. Since this Richeza was the only Richeza of Denmark, the current title is just fine. We should avoid long, clumsy titles; eg. [[Catherine of Aragon]] is much better than [[Catherine of Aragon, Queen of England]]. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 19:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
9708 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9706 +++$+++ 9707 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.254193380E09 +++$+++ I also believe just as much in a ''global perspective'' for all WP projects as I do in using the best possible English to reflect it.  +++$+++ ::I also believe just as much in a ''global perspective'' for all WP projects as I do in using the best possible English to reflect it. [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 20:03, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
9709 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9706 +++$+++ 9708 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.254193920E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your appreciation, SergeWoodzing. I think I must agree with Surtsicna in this issue, however. I used the queen title for Richeza of Sweden, because the dates for her births and death is unknown, but I think that should be avoided if it is possible to do so, as it is a little long for a title. -- +++$+++ :::Thank you for your appreciation, SergeWoodzing. I think I must agree with Surtsicna in this issue, however. I used the queen title for Richeza of Sweden, because the dates for her births and death is unknown, but I think that should be avoided if it is possible to do so, as it is a little long for a title. --[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram#top|talk]]) 20:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
9710 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9706 +++$+++ 9709 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.254195300E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry I wrote to you about this.  +++$+++ ::::I'm sorry I wrote to you about this. [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 20:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
9711 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9706 +++$+++ 9710 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.254196260E09 +++$+++ No need to appologize. We all have different oppinions, and that's fine with me. I'm glad the titles were changed from the original ones, if those were badly suited. -- +++$+++ :::::No need to appologize. We all have different oppinions, and that's fine with me. I'm glad the titles were changed from the original ones, if those were badly suited. --[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram#top|talk]]) 20:51, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

533998 +++$+++ Johnfos +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533998 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-22 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.258901580E09 +++$+++ This unsatisfactory situation continues, yet [[Wikipedia:User page#Copies of other pages]] says \"While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content ... Wikipedia is not a free web host.\" --  +++$+++ This unsatisfactory situation continues, yet [[Wikipedia:User page#Copies of other pages]] says "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content ... Wikipedia is not a free web host." -- [[User:Johnfos|Johnfos]] ([[User talk:Johnfos|talk]]) 06:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
533999 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533998 +++$+++ 533998 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.258941000E09 +++$+++ True. If you think this is violated, you should take it to [[WP:MFD]]. I don't feel comfortable with deleting the content straight away because it's not in the article space but if the outcome of MFD is delete, then you can always point me the recreations and they can be deleted easily. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : True. If you think this is violated, you should take it to [[WP:MFD]]. I don't feel comfortable with deleting the content straight away because it's not in the article space but if the outcome of MFD is delete, then you can always point me the recreations and they can be deleted easily. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
534000 +++$+++ Johnfos +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533998 +++$+++ 533999 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.258953480E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion\/User:Kerberos\/Sandbox]] --  +++$+++ ::See [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kerberos/Sandbox]] -- [[User:Johnfos|Johnfos]] ([[User talk:Johnfos|talk]]) 21:18, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

271855 +++$+++ Cullen328 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-02 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.296694260E09 +++$+++ Hello, Can you please explain why this is a G11?  It looks to me like an inexperienced new user barraged by four speedies within 20 minutes.  Am I missing something?  +++$+++ Hello, Can you please explain why this is a G11?  It looks to me like an inexperienced new user barraged by four speedies within 20 minutes.  Am I missing something? [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 16:51, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
271856 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271855 +++$+++ 271855 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.296695340E09 +++$+++ It was actually completely lifted from the main section of [http:\/\/www.mayhs.org\/ their official site] at first. I put the original G11 speedy after finding the article in a maintenance category and seeing the \"our\", etc. He removed the speedy and eventually blanked the page, which I took as a G7 deletion and marked for speedy once more, which it qualified for.  +++$+++ :It was actually completely lifted from the main section of [http://www.mayhs.org/ their official site] at first. I put the original G11 speedy after finding the article in a maintenance category and seeing the "our", etc. He removed the speedy and eventually blanked the page, which I took as a G7 deletion and marked for speedy once more, which it qualified for. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 17:09, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
271857 +++$+++ Cullen328 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271855 +++$+++ 271856 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.296699060E09 +++$+++ Were there any communications with the user explaining copyright issues?  Was a paraphrase suggested as an alternative to cut and paste? If you are too busy to do so, I will be happy to greet and assist the new user.  I no longer have the user name.  Please advise.  +++$+++ ::Were there any communications with the user explaining copyright issues?  Was a paraphrase suggested as an alternative to cut and paste? If you are too busy to do so, I will be happy to greet and assist the new user.  I no longer have the user name.  Please advise. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 18:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
271858 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271855 +++$+++ 271857 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.296699660E09 +++$+++ I used Twinkle, so it gave a G11 generic speedy notice to [[User:Misterman694]]. At the time I did not realize it was a copyvio.  +++$+++ :::I used Twinkle, so it gave a G11 generic speedy notice to [[User:Misterman694]]. At the time I did not realize it was a copyvio. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 18:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

534001 +++$+++ Jeremjay24 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-07 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.257588120E09 +++$+++ On the [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/MechScape_(2nd_nomination)]], you made a redirect to [[User:Jeremjay24\/MechScape]]. That page was actually a redirect to [[MechScape]], due to moving by [[User:Gordonrox24]]. It now remains a redirect loop, so could you please change the status into '''Delete''' and delete the MechScape page and my userpage? You got my approval.  +++$+++ On the [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MechScape_(2nd_nomination)]], you made a redirect to [[User:Jeremjay24/MechScape]]. That page was actually a redirect to [[MechScape]], due to moving by [[User:Gordonrox24]]. It now remains a redirect loop, so could you please change the status into '''Delete''' and delete the MechScape page and my userpage? You got my approval. [[User:Jeremjay24|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:#FF0000">Jeremjay</span>]][[User_talk:Jeremjay24|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:green">24</span>]] ''' 02:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
534002 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534001 +++$+++ 534001 +++$+++ 2009-11-07 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.257608940E09 +++$+++ Ok, done. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, done. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:49, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
534003 +++$+++ Jeremjay24 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534001 +++$+++ 534002 +++$+++ 2009-11-07 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.257628140E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Thanks! [[User:Jeremjay24|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:#FF0000">Jeremjay</span>]][[User_talk:Jeremjay24|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:green">24</span>]] ''' 13:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

271859 +++$+++ Dthomsen8 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271859 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-22 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.295730780E09 +++$+++ In a recent deletion discussion, you said \"A previous G12 failed because the SPA that created the article took out the tag.\"  As an experienced editor, I get the flavor of this jargon, but I don't know what SPA stands for, and the disambiguation page for SPA doesn't seem to include it. Please help me out as I continue to make Wikipedia jargon understandable to experienced editors, if not for the newbies.-- +++$+++ In a recent deletion discussion, you said "A previous G12 failed because the SPA that created the article took out the tag."  As an experienced editor, I get the flavor of this jargon, but I don't know what SPA stands for, and the disambiguation page for SPA doesn't seem to include it. Please help me out as I continue to make Wikipedia jargon understandable to experienced editors, if not for the newbies.--[[User:Dthomsen8|DThomsen8]] ([[User talk:Dthomsen8|talk]]) 13:13, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
271860 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271859 +++$+++ 271859 +++$+++ 2011-01-22 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.295750040E09 +++$+++ [[WP:SPA|SPA]] means '''single-purpose account''', an account with few or no edits outside the topic in question. It was recently added to the mainspace SPA page as an \"On Wikipedia\" item.  +++$+++ :[[WP:SPA|SPA]] means '''single-purpose account''', an account with few or no edits outside the topic in question. It was recently added to the mainspace SPA page as an "On Wikipedia" item. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 18:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
271861 +++$+++ Dthomsen8 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271859 +++$+++ 271860 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.298262600E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the explanation. I do know users like that, only on Wikipedia to promote some specific band, company, or narrow viewpoint. -- +++$+++ ::Thank you for the explanation. I do know users like that, only on Wikipedia to promote some specific band, company, or narrow viewpoint. --[[User:Dthomsen8|DThomsen8]] ([[User talk:Dthomsen8|talk]]) 20:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

534004 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-08 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.257670620E09 +++$+++ While I agree with keeping the page, closing an AfD you voted in is almost always inappropriate. To avoid the inevitable drama, I recommend reverting your close and leaving it for another admin. I won't make a big deal of it though. \u2013''' +++$+++ While I agree with keeping the page, closing an AfD you voted in is almost always inappropriate. To avoid the inevitable drama, I recommend reverting your close and leaving it for another admin. I won't make a big deal of it though. –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 00:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
534005 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534004 +++$+++ 534004 +++$+++ 2009-11-08 10:42:00 +++$+++ 1.257705720E09 +++$+++ Ok, reverted. I'll add a comment there. Thanks for a reminder. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, reverted. I'll add a comment there. Thanks for a reminder. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

534006 +++$+++ Dalejenkins +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534006 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-08 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.257716280E09 +++$+++ You protected [[The Fame: Monster]] after [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/The Fame: Monster|this AfD discussion]], but you did not protect [[The Fame Monster]], causing the article to be re-created again and again. Would a full protection be possible? Thanks, ''' +++$+++ You protected [[The Fame: Monster]] after [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fame: Monster|this AfD discussion]], but you did not protect [[The Fame Monster]], causing the article to be re-created again and again. Would a full protection be possible? Thanks, '''[[User:Dalejenkins|Dale]]''' 13:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
534007 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534006 +++$+++ 534006 +++$+++ 2009-11-08 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.257718140E09 +++$+++ Done. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Done. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

271864 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271864 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.300359660E09 +++$+++ Should I just gut the very un-NPOV criticism section of the article on the [[Higley Unified School District]]? It has the bulk of the references but also the bulk of the problems with the article especially after writing a new history of the district.  +++$+++ Should I just gut the very un-NPOV criticism section of the article on the [[Higley Unified School District]]? It has the bulk of the references but also the bulk of the problems with the article especially after writing a new history of the district. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 04:01, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
271865 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271864 +++$+++ 271864 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.300363440E09 +++$+++ I suggest [[WP:BRD]] (which, really, means \"gods, yeah; do it per [[WP:BOLD|bold]]\" - if people complain, then discuss it with them) - I'm leaving the 'helpme' in place, as other people may have different opinions; :this is, as always, <span title=\"in my humble opinion\">[[#|IMHO]]<\/span>.<small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ :I suggest [[WP:BRD]] (which, really, means "gods, yeah; do it per [[WP:BOLD|bold]]" - if people complain, then discuss it with them) - I'm leaving the 'helpme' in place, as other people may have different opinions; :this is, as always, <span title="in my humble opinion">[[#|IMHO]]</span>.<small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 05:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
271866 +++$+++ Banaticus +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271864 +++$+++ 271865 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.300372320E09 +++$+++ Well, it's not really policy to gut referenced sections without rewriting them (in other words, write a rewrite, then just past it into that section -- don't delete it and then let it sit around blank for a while until you're done putting together a rewrite).  That being said, that particular section did seem to have some [[WP:BLP|BLP]] problems, so I rewrote it a bit and deleted things that said some touchy things but whose references weren't still good.  That section still needs a good deal of rewriting. {{User:Banaticus\/contact}}  +++$+++ ::Well, it's not really policy to gut referenced sections without rewriting them (in other words, write a rewrite, then just past it into that section -- don't delete it and then let it sit around blank for a while until you're done putting together a rewrite).  That being said, that particular section did seem to have some [[WP:BLP|BLP]] problems, so I rewrote it a bit and deleted things that said some touchy things but whose references weren't still good.  That section still needs a good deal of rewriting. {{User:Banaticus/contact}} [[User:Banaticus|Banaticus]] ([[User talk:Banaticus|talk]]) 07:32, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

532795 +++$+++ Natsubee +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.181082960E09 +++$+++ I do not know what is happening here. Did you delete this article? If you did, what are you planning to do about its talk page? If not, well then sorry for the query. If found this in a Google search as the talk page exists in isolation.-- +++$+++ I do not know what is happening here. Did you delete this article? If you did, what are you planning to do about its talk page? If not, well then sorry for the query. If found this in a Google search as the talk page exists in isolation.--[[User:Natsubee|Natsubee]] 15:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
532796 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532795 +++$+++ 532795 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.181086980E09 +++$+++ Right, seems I missed the talk page. I deleted it now. Thanks for the remark. --''' +++$+++ : Right, seems I missed the talk page. I deleted it now. Thanks for the remark. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 16:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

9723 +++$+++ (RT) +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-06 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.283819100E09 +++$+++ Hello Aciram - I noticed you added Caterina Benedicta to the Classical era list, but with reference to her WP entry and biography in ''[http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/-\/dp\/0393034879 Norton\/Grove Dictionary of Women Composers]'', she had an oratorio performed in Vienna as early as 1705, so we can presume that she was born during the late 17th century. The oratorios are also described as \"conventional early 18th-century\" which would be late Baroque in style. On that basis, I moved her earlier on the [[List of Baroque composers]] a while ago and don't think she belongs on the Classical era list. I thought you might like to know why I have moved your entry. Regards,  +++$+++ Hello Aciram - I noticed you added Caterina Benedicta to the Classical era list, but with reference to her WP entry and biography in ''[http://www.amazon.com/-/dp/0393034879 Norton/Grove Dictionary of Women Composers]'', she had an oratorio performed in Vienna as early as 1705, so we can presume that she was born during the late 17th century. The oratorios are also described as "conventional early 18th-century" which would be late Baroque in style. On that basis, I moved her earlier on the [[List of Baroque composers]] a while ago and don't think she belongs on the Classical era list. I thought you might like to know why I have moved your entry. Regards, [[User:(RT)|(RT)]] ([[User talk:(RT)|talk]]) 17:25, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
9724 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9723 +++$+++ 9723 +++$+++ 2010-09-06 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.283823300E09 +++$+++ Thank you, that was clarifying. Regards, -- +++$+++ :Thank you, that was clarifying. Regards, --[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram#top|talk]]) 18:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

534012 +++$+++ DanV +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534012 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-11 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.257994140E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:DanV|DanV]] ([[User talk:DanV|talk]]) 18:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
534013 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534012 +++$+++ 534012 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.258033500E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'm probably not the best person to present arguments to, I just did the admin work. You should talk to user who proposed a redirect at the AfD and if they are fine with the new situation, I can easily fix the redirects back to the previous state. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I'm probably not the best person to present arguments to, I just did the admin work. You should talk to user who proposed a redirect at the AfD and if they are fine with the new situation, I can easily fix the redirects back to the previous state. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 05:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
534014 +++$+++ CycloneGU +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534012 +++$+++ 534013 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.258069200E09 +++$+++ Just a quick addition here.  I know you just did the admin. work, but where is this AfD?  I'd like to have the person who nominated The Fame Monster for AfD take a look at the comments [[User talk:Explicit#The Fame|here]].  The 8-track disc is now undisputably a standalone album and needs to have its own article for the sake of Wikipedia.  I'll check your contributions to find this AfD as well and locate the nominator.   +++$+++ ::Just a quick addition here.  I know you just did the admin. work, but where is this AfD?  I'd like to have the person who nominated The Fame Monster for AfD take a look at the comments [[User talk:Explicit#The Fame|here]].  The 8-track disc is now undisputably a standalone album and needs to have its own article for the sake of Wikipedia.  I'll check your contributions to find this AfD as well and locate the nominator.  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 15:40, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
534015 +++$+++ CycloneGU +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534012 +++$+++ 534013 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.258069500E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/The Fame: Monster|Found it.]]  Look at the dates in the AfD.  Look at the dates of the current sources.  The nominator isn't clear, but the age of the AfD in light of the new material demands the page be recreated with the new material.   +++$+++ ::[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fame: Monster|Found it.]]  Look at the dates in the AfD.  Look at the dates of the current sources.  The nominator isn't clear, but the age of the AfD in light of the new material demands the page be recreated with the new material.  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 15:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
534016 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534012 +++$+++ 534015 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.258072320E09 +++$+++ All fine with me. Could you just talk to [[User:Dalejenkins]], who nominated the article, so that this thing is fine after that? Then, I can easily remove protection from the article so it can be brought back. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ ::: All fine with me. Could you just talk to [[User:Dalejenkins]], who nominated the article, so that this thing is fine after that? Then, I can easily remove protection from the article so it can be brought back. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
534017 +++$+++ CycloneGU +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534012 +++$+++ 534016 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.258073460E09 +++$+++ Done.  I've asked in general for other editors to not add on, but if you wish to say something there, by all means.  I've asked him to check this page in any case. =)   +++$+++ ::::Done.  I've asked in general for other editors to not add on, but if you wish to say something there, by all means.  I've asked him to check this page in any case. =)  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 16:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

271869 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271869 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-09 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.304943480E09 +++$+++ Both are at different locations, and I'm concerned that the coordinate and location conflict that results is undesirable. The article is otherwise pretty nice, but I don't know if the coordinates are an issue. The coordinates currently in there are of the old building. Don't expect a reply from me: I'm going to bed for the night.  +++$+++ Both are at different locations, and I'm concerned that the coordinate and location conflict that results is undesirable. The article is otherwise pretty nice, but I don't know if the coordinates are an issue. The coordinates currently in there are of the old building. Don't expect a reply from me: I'm going to bed for the night. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 05:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
271870 +++$+++ Mabdul +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271869 +++$+++ 271869 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.304961660E09 +++$+++ Maybe if the building has enough content then split it into an own separate article... <small style=\"font:bold 12px Courier New;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap\"><font color=\"#000\"> +++$+++ :Maybe if the building has enough content then split it into an own separate article... <small style="font:bold 12px Courier New;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap"><font color="#000">[[User talk:Mabdul|mabdul]]</font></small> 10:21, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

271871 +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271871 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-13 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.305285420E09 +++$+++ The infobox is broken, and I don't know how to fix it. Found in random page patrol. (no need to reply)  +++$+++ The infobox is broken, and I don't know how to fix it. Found in random page patrol. (no need to reply) [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 04:17, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
271872 +++$+++ SudoGhost +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271871 +++$+++ 271871 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.305286860E09 +++$+++ Restored to a previous version to fix the template, since trying to manually do so didn't seem to work. -  +++$+++ :Restored to a previous version to fix the template, since trying to manually do so didn't seem to work. - [[User:SudoGhost|SudoGhost]] ([[User talk:SudoGhost|talk]]) 04:41, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
271873 +++$+++ SudoGhost +++$+++ Raymie +++$+++ 271871 +++$+++ 271872 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.305286980E09 +++$+++ Never mind, it was a open double-bracket without a closing set which broke it. -  +++$+++ ::Never mind, it was a open double-bracket without a closing set which broke it. - [[User:SudoGhost|SudoGhost]] ([[User talk:SudoGhost|talk]]) 04:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

9729 +++$+++ SQGibbon +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9729 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-29 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.293612180E09 +++$+++ Hey, I just came across the article you wrote on [[Augusta Lundin]].  I do not understand your use of references here and was hoping you might explain it to me.  Are you quoting from magazines, books, newspaper articles?  Also, it appears that the same reference is repeated multiple times.  In Wikipedia there's a way to combine multiple occurrences of the same reference into one using the ref name=\"whatever\" construction.  I'd be more than happy to do that work if I actually understood the references.  An anonymous IP removed the \"multiple issue\" template from the article, was that you not logged in?  Thanks.  +++$+++ Hey, I just came across the article you wrote on [[Augusta Lundin]].  I do not understand your use of references here and was hoping you might explain it to me.  Are you quoting from magazines, books, newspaper articles?  Also, it appears that the same reference is repeated multiple times.  In Wikipedia there's a way to combine multiple occurrences of the same reference into one using the ref name="whatever" construction.  I'd be more than happy to do that work if I actually understood the references.  An anonymous IP removed the "multiple issue" template from the article, was that you not logged in?  Thanks. [[User:SQGibbon|SQGibbon]] ([[User talk:SQGibbon|talk]]) 00:43, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
9730 +++$+++ SQGibbon +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9729 +++$+++ 9729 +++$+++ 2010-12-29 05:16:00 +++$+++ 1.293628560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the response and the extra information, I've put my response on the talk page for the article.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the response and the extra information, I've put my response on the talk page for the article. [[User:SQGibbon|SQGibbon]] ([[User talk:SQGibbon|talk]]) 05:16, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

9731 +++$+++ FactStraight +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9731 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-24 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.295924100E09 +++$+++ Please do not undo reverts of [[WP:VANDAL|vandalism]]. ''Any'' edit made using a sockpuppet while that editor is blocked is [[WP:VANDAL#Types of vandalism|considered vandalism]], and is [[Wikipedia:VANDAL|subject to immediate deletion]] ''even if the edit is an acceptable change to an article''. I reverted edits of [[User:90.193.109.158]] and of [[User:85.226.44.57]] because admins confirmed that the edits were made by sockpuppets of [[User:LouisPhilippeCharles|LouisPhilippeCharles]] who has been blocked indefinitely -- and therefore he is not allowed to edit Wikipedia articles unless his block is lifted. Whenever admins tried to persuade him to edit within Wikipedia's rules, he said he would do so, didn't, and was then blocked by different admins (I am not an admin). Please see his [[User talk:LouisPhilippeCharles|talk page]]: He always defends himself by arguing that, even if he breaks Wikipedia policies, his edits \"improve\" Wikipedia and therefore he should be allowed to continue to edit. This argument has been repeatedly rejected by different admins. If a user who is under indefinite block is allowed to edit Wikipedia, the admins' decision to block him\/her is being nullified and Wikipedia's rules are being flouted. In good faith, I will not revert your reverts this time. However I will continue to record in the edit summary that I am reverting edits made by a blocked user or his\/her sockpuppet -- and such reverts are considered proper editing. Please do not encourage a blocked user from breaking Wikipedia polcy by using sockpuppets. Thanks.  +++$+++ Please do not undo reverts of [[WP:VANDAL|vandalism]]. ''Any'' edit made using a sockpuppet while that editor is blocked is [[WP:VANDAL#Types of vandalism|considered vandalism]], and is [[Wikipedia:VANDAL|subject to immediate deletion]] ''even if the edit is an acceptable change to an article''. I reverted edits of [[User:90.193.109.158]] and of [[User:85.226.44.57]] because admins confirmed that the edits were made by sockpuppets of [[User:LouisPhilippeCharles|LouisPhilippeCharles]] who has been blocked indefinitely -- and therefore he is not allowed to edit Wikipedia articles unless his block is lifted. Whenever admins tried to persuade him to edit within Wikipedia's rules, he said he would do so, didn't, and was then blocked by different admins (I am not an admin). Please see his [[User talk:LouisPhilippeCharles|talk page]]: He always defends himself by arguing that, even if he breaks Wikipedia policies, his edits "improve" Wikipedia and therefore he should be allowed to continue to edit. This argument has been repeatedly rejected by different admins. If a user who is under indefinite block is allowed to edit Wikipedia, the admins' decision to block him/her is being nullified and Wikipedia's rules are being flouted. In good faith, I will not revert your reverts this time. However I will continue to record in the edit summary that I am reverting edits made by a blocked user or his/her sockpuppet -- and such reverts are considered proper editing. Please do not encourage a blocked user from breaking Wikipedia polcy by using sockpuppets. Thanks. [[User:FactStraight|FactStraight]] ([[User talk:FactStraight|talk]]) 18:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
9732 +++$+++ FactStraight +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9731 +++$+++ 9731 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.295936280E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your prompt reply to my comment above. I have replied on my [[User talk:FactStraight|talk page]].  +++$+++ :Thank you for your prompt reply to my comment above. I have replied on my [[User talk:FactStraight|talk page]]. [[User:FactStraight|FactStraight]] ([[User talk:FactStraight|talk]]) 22:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
9733 +++$+++ FactStraight +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9731 +++$+++ 9732 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.295947140E09 +++$+++ As you can see, the [[User talk:I'm From England|drama continues]]: He still defends his behavior, pleads for clemency -- while making edits by sockpuppet! So the admins reject his requests to unblock.  +++$+++ ::As you can see, the [[User talk:I'm From England|drama continues]]: He still defends his behavior, pleads for clemency -- while making edits by sockpuppet! So the admins reject his requests to unblock. [[User:FactStraight|FactStraight]] ([[User talk:FactStraight|talk]]) 01:19, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

534021 +++$+++ Taelus +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-13 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.258133340E09 +++$+++ Good day, you were the closing admin for the Thomas Goggin AfD. There is currently an RfD for [[Thomas goggin]], which had a concensus of keep prior to the target page being deleted. Could you speedy delete the redirect under G8 if you have the time? I will list it as such now, however I felt I would inform you. Happy editing, -- +++$+++ Good day, you were the closing admin for the Thomas Goggin AfD. There is currently an RfD for [[Thomas goggin]], which had a concensus of keep prior to the target page being deleted. Could you speedy delete the redirect under G8 if you have the time? I will list it as such now, however I felt I would inform you. Happy editing, --[[User:Taelus|Taelus]] ([[User talk:Taelus|talk]]) 09:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
534022 +++$+++ Taelus +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534021 +++$+++ 534021 +++$+++ 2009-11-13 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.258143600E09 +++$+++ Thank you, have a good day! -- +++$+++ :Thank you, have a good day! --[[User:Taelus|Taelus]] ([[User talk:Taelus|talk]]) 12:20, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
534023 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534021 +++$+++ 534021 +++$+++ 2009-11-16 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.258421100E09 +++$+++ Hi. In short, the article was way to short that the notability could be established (actually, it was not written why it is notable). Every article has to fulfil this requirement. So, basically, my suggestion is wither to start the article from the beginning and write more about it or, as someone else suggested, merge the info about this product to one of the HP articles and leave a redirect. I hope this helps. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. In short, the article was way to short that the notability could be established (actually, it was not written why it is notable). Every article has to fulfil this requirement. So, basically, my suggestion is wither to start the article from the beginning and write more about it or, as someone else suggested, merge the info about this product to one of the HP articles and leave a redirect. I hope this helps. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:25, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

9734 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9734 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-17 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.303035300E09 +++$+++ Please be more careful with your [[Swenglish]] and other language issues than [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Princess_Sophie_of_Sweden&diff=424466635&oldid=424465404 this]. Other editors are not supposed to be burdened time and time again with this kind unacceptable ''English''. Here is a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:SergeWoodzing#Best_ever good read] you might find inspiring.  +++$+++ Please be more careful with your [[Swenglish]] and other language issues than [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Princess_Sophie_of_Sweden&diff=424466635&oldid=424465404 this]. Other editors are not supposed to be burdened time and time again with this kind unacceptable ''English''. Here is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SergeWoodzing#Best_ever good read] you might find inspiring. [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 03:15, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
9735 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9734 +++$+++ 9734 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.303121760E09 +++$+++ The common ''Word'' program, for example, has very easy methods of performing '''spelling checks''' on any English text you write. Learn them! Almost all of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Princess_Sophie_of_Sweden&diff=prev&oldid=424624105 these errors] could have been avoided if you had been more careful and used tools to try to avoid them before submitting your text. We are not takling about typos here, but your continued tendency to write what you imagine might be correct English and to ''intentionally'' leave it to others to clean up your mess. That attitude of yours is getting to be well known now, as per [http:\/\/sv.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Anv%C3%A4ndardiskussion:Aciram#Hela_meningar_2 this] frightening example, and I am warning you as cordially as possible that it is going to have to change if you want to stay out of serious trouble on Wikimedia projects. The rest of us are not your clean-up crew, and it is intolerable when you show us so blatantly that you think we ''are that''. Many of your contributions are valuable, but you, too, must try to write ''English'' here, just like the rest of us must.  +++$+++ :The common ''Word'' program, for example, has very easy methods of performing '''spelling checks''' on any English text you write. Learn them! Almost all of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Princess_Sophie_of_Sweden&diff=prev&oldid=424624105 these errors] could have been avoided if you had been more careful and used tools to try to avoid them before submitting your text. We are not takling about typos here, but your continued tendency to write what you imagine might be correct English and to ''intentionally'' leave it to others to clean up your mess. That attitude of yours is getting to be well known now, as per [http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndardiskussion:Aciram#Hela_meningar_2 this] frightening example, and I am warning you as cordially as possible that it is going to have to change if you want to stay out of serious trouble on Wikimedia projects. The rest of us are not your clean-up crew, and it is intolerable when you show us so blatantly that you think we ''are that''. Many of your contributions are valuable, but you, too, must try to write ''English'' here, just like the rest of us must. [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 03:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
9736 +++$+++ Fernbom2 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9734 +++$+++ 9735 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.312109280E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, as far as I know, there are no possibility, in english as well as in Swedish, for the spelling check to find real words who are not properly used. There are, however, grammatical checks, but I am not sure how useful they are. To be careful is a good thing, but I thought that no user has duties - at least it is that way in the Swedish version.  +++$+++ :: Unfortunately, as far as I know, there are no possibility, in english as well as in Swedish, for the spelling check to find real words who are not properly used. There are, however, grammatical checks, but I am not sure how useful they are. To be careful is a good thing, but I thought that no user has duties - at least it is that way in the Swedish version. [[User:Fernbom2|Fernbom2]] ([[User talk:Fernbom2|talk]]) 03:48, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
9737 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9734 +++$+++ 9736 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.312159200E09 +++$+++ I often work out of Sweden and I have an excellent, free, built-in English or Swedish grammar ''and'' spelling program in ''Word'' on that computer using Firefox (as this user says she does) - red underlinings for spelling and green for grammar - which would preclude almost all of the huge amount of problems caused by this user regarding readability, or at least alert her to the very quanitity of the problems and inspire a constructive attitude as to her own capacity. Perhaps if one does not consider it a \"duty\" of sorts to contribute readable English here, that actually might be the problem?  +++$+++ ::: I often work out of Sweden and I have an excellent, free, built-in English or Swedish grammar ''and'' spelling program in ''Word'' on that computer using Firefox (as this user says she does) - red underlinings for spelling and green for grammar - which would preclude almost all of the huge amount of problems caused by this user regarding readability, or at least alert her to the very quanitity of the problems and inspire a constructive attitude as to her own capacity. Perhaps if one does not consider it a "duty" of sorts to contribute readable English here, that actually might be the problem? [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 17:40, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

534024 +++$+++ Kuyabribri +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-17 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.258456080E09 +++$+++ You closed this AfD with a consensus of delete, but I noticed the main article [[New album - Rotting Christ]] has not been deleted. There were some issues related to page moves, so I'm guessing this was an unintentional oversight on your part. Was it? <span style=\"color:#808080\"> +++$+++ You closed this AfD with a consensus of delete, but I noticed the main article [[New album - Rotting Christ]] has not been deleted. There were some issues related to page moves, so I'm guessing this was an unintentional oversight on your part. Was it? <span style="color:#808080">[[User:Kuyabribri|KuyaBriBri]]</span><sup><span style="color:#008080">[[User_Talk:Kuyabribri|Talk]]</span></sup> 03:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
534025 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534024 +++$+++ 534024 +++$+++ 2009-11-17 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.258480740E09 +++$+++ Hi. Yes, probably this was the case, the script deleted a redirect page but left the new one. Manually deleted now, thanks for noticing. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Yes, probably this was the case, the script deleted a redirect page but left the new one. Manually deleted now, thanks for noticing. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
534026 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534024 +++$+++ 534024 +++$+++ 2009-11-18 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.258590360E09 +++$+++ Hi. I could bring the article back but it won't last long before someone else tags it for deletion. The problem is that the guideline [[WP:ATHLETE]] says that a player has to play for a professional league and this is college football. On the other hand, the article was deleted almost 2 years ago, if there's some new content, it could be added. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I could bring the article back but it won't last long before someone else tags it for deletion. The problem is that the guideline [[WP:ATHLETE]] says that a player has to play for a professional league and this is college football. On the other hand, the article was deleted almost 2 years ago, if there's some new content, it could be added. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
534027 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534024 +++$+++ 534024 +++$+++ 2009-11-18 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.258591740E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article is back now. For further details, I believe you'll find much more useful help at one of the Wikiprojects, maybe [[Wikipedia:WikiProject College football]]. Good luck! --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article is back now. For further details, I believe you'll find much more useful help at one of the Wikiprojects, maybe [[Wikipedia:WikiProject College football]]. Good luck! --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:49, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

271881 +++$+++ Postoak +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-19 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.161242640E09 +++$+++ Hey there..what is the ideal size for an article? I will work on the \"History\" section of the article as you recommended. I would like to take the article to peer review soon. Thanks for your help.  +++$+++ Hey there..what is the ideal size for an article? I will work on the "History" section of the article as you recommended. I would like to take the article to peer review soon. Thanks for your help. [[User:Postoak|Postoak]] 00:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
271882 +++$+++ Postoak +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271881 +++$+++ 271881 +++$+++ 2007-03-07 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.173264300E09 +++$+++ The global city stuff..my sentiments exactly :)  +++$+++ :The global city stuff..my sentiments exactly :) [[User:Postoak|Postoak]] 02:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

271883 +++$+++ DMacks +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-01 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.162386420E09 +++$+++ Looks good now (well, \"agrees with the cite\", not \"gee, I'm glad a lot of folks are getting killed\":).  +++$+++ Looks good now (well, "agrees with the cite", not "gee, I'm glad a lot of folks are getting killed":). [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] 05:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
271884 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271883 +++$+++ 271883 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.162502640E09 +++$+++ Ridership already includes streetcar, as per source.-- +++$+++ :Ridership already includes streetcar, as per source.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 13:24, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
271885 +++$+++ Callcentermonkey +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271883 +++$+++ 271884 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.162506480E09 +++$+++ No problem!  Thanks again, and feel free to delete this section if you wish.-- +++$+++ :: No problem!  Thanks again, and feel free to delete this section if you wish.--[[User:Callcentermonkey|Callcentermonkey]] 14:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

9740 +++$+++ Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9740 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.310450340E09 +++$+++ Could you not create articles of consorts if all you do is write one sentence and never go back to them at all?-- +++$+++ Could you not create articles of consorts if all you do is write one sentence and never go back to them at all?--[[User:Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy|Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy]] ([[User talk:Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy|talk]]) 22:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
9741 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9740 +++$+++ 9740 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310458380E09 +++$+++ I hope she (it's a she, she says) replies. You gave a very good point here.  +++$+++ :I hope she (it's a she, she says) replies. You gave a very good point here. [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 01:13, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
9742 +++$+++ Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9740 +++$+++ 9741 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.310661600E09 +++$+++ It's not that you can or can't, it that most of the time your articles are left as stub with no one who will try to improve it. I personally think you should only create an article that you actually know something about. Also when you do create these articles. Don't write that you translated them from other wikipedia when you most likely did not. Please add the translation template on top to the best alternative article on the other language wiki so at least translators might come around to improving them. See [[Catherine Bagration]] for example.-- +++$+++ ::It's not that you can or can't, it that most of the time your articles are left as stub with no one who will try to improve it. I personally think you should only create an article that you actually know something about. Also when you do create these articles. Don't write that you translated them from other wikipedia when you most likely did not. Please add the translation template on top to the best alternative article on the other language wiki so at least translators might come around to improving them. See [[Catherine Bagration]] for example.--[[User:Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy|Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy]] ([[User talk:Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy|talk]]) 09:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

534030 +++$+++ Seanwolfington +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-22 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.258896660E09 +++$+++ I can provide more information but this is a summary of my background. Please let me know if you believe this is noteworthy enough. Thank you.  +++$+++ I can provide more information but this is a summary of my background. Please let me know if you believe this is noteworthy enough. Thank you. [[User:Seanwolfington|Seanwolfington]] ([[User talk:Seanwolfington|talk]]) 05:31, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
534031 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534030 +++$+++ 534030 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.258940820E09 +++$+++ Hi. Well, this reads good. However, when the article was deleted, it did not contain any of those information so it's a bit hard to say from that point of view... I suggest you bring the article to the [[WP:DRV]] and present the new arguments, they will direct you how to proceed. I hope this helps, good luck. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Well, this reads good. However, when the article was deleted, it did not contain any of those information so it's a bit hard to say from that point of view... I suggest you bring the article to the [[WP:DRV]] and present the new arguments, they will direct you how to proceed. I hope this helps, good luck. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

9743 +++$+++ JackofOz +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.311561480E09 +++$+++ Cheers.  +++$+++ Cheers. [[User:JackofOz|<font face="Papyrus">Jack of Oz</font>]] [[User talk:JackofOz#top|<font face="Papyrus"><sup>[your turn]</sup></font>]] 19:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
9744 +++$+++ JackofOz +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9743 +++$+++ 9743 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311563040E09 +++$+++ 'Know' and 'now' are pronounced differently as well as spelled differently.  '''Know''' rhymes with go, slow, dough, flow, grow.  '''Now''' rhymes with cow, how, vow, plough (plow) and wow.  Cheers.  --   +++$+++ : 'Know' and 'now' are pronounced differently as well as spelled differently.  '''Know''' rhymes with go, slow, dough, flow, grow.  '''Now''' rhymes with cow, how, vow, plough (plow) and wow.  Cheers.  --  [[User:JackofOz|<font face="Papyrus">Jack of Oz</font>]] [[User talk:JackofOz#top|<font face="Papyrus"><sup>[your turn]</sup></font>]] 20:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

534032 +++$+++ Seanwolfington +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-23 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.258981500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your quick response. What is the WP:DRV and how do i bring the article to them? Also, is it possible to view the old article because other editors edited the article and added references that would be nice to have if i am going to submit something to someone. Thanks again for your advice. Sean. +++$+++ Thanks for your quick response. What is the WP:DRV and how do i bring the article to them? Also, is it possible to view the old article because other editors edited the article and added references that would be nice to have if i am going to submit something to someone. Thanks again for your advice. Sean.[[User:Seanwolfington|Seanwolfington]] ([[User talk:Seanwolfington|talk]]) 05:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
534033 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534032 +++$+++ 534032 +++$+++ 2009-11-23 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.258992180E09 +++$+++ Hi. DRV, deletion review, is a process where a revision is made of the articles that were deleted through one of the deletion mechanisms. Admins will have a look at the article (an admin can view the deleted history) and new evidence you can present and wil then decide whether it is possible to bring the article back. All the instructions are at that page. Le tme know if you need any help. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. DRV, deletion review, is a process where a revision is made of the articles that were deleted through one of the deletion mechanisms. Admins will have a look at the article (an admin can view the deleted history) and new evidence you can present and wil then decide whether it is possible to bring the article back. All the instructions are at that page. Le tme know if you need any help. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:03, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
534034 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534032 +++$+++ 534032 +++$+++ 2009-11-23 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.259041560E09 +++$+++ Hi. That article was deleted in the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion]] process, pretty routine thing. A tag was placed on the article and since noone objected to deletion (people review those nominations and if they find the nomination reason bad, they remove it - apparently, noone did this time), it got deleted after a week. The standard policy in such cases is that if a deletion is contested (as you just did), the article is simply brought back (what I'll do just now). Since you say there's been new development and new sources in the last months, I invite you to incorporate them in the article. Let me know if you need any help. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. That article was deleted in the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion]] process, pretty routine thing. A tag was placed on the article and since noone objected to deletion (people review those nominations and if they find the nomination reason bad, they remove it - apparently, noone did this time), it got deleted after a week. The standard policy in such cases is that if a deletion is contested (as you just did), the article is simply brought back (what I'll do just now). Since you say there's been new development and new sources in the last months, I invite you to incorporate them in the article. Let me know if you need any help. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:46, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

9745 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312098600E09 +++$+++ I understand that English is not your native language. I just looked at your contributions to [[Louise Mountbatten]] and you've added a wealth of interesting information. I don't think anyone would complain about an occasional misuse of a word, but I probably cleaned up 30 misspelled words. Even if you do not know the correct English spelling, surely you have access to a spell-checker. In almost all cases, a spell checker picked up the error. If you were to make the corrections proposed by a spell-checker, I think others would be more inclined to clean-up the remaining issues. Does this seem like an unreasonable request? If you do not have a spell-checker, we can talk about how to get one for you. In my case, I compose in an editor with a spell checker, and my browser also has a spell-checker built-in. (As an aside, when I finished writing this post, I invoked my spell-checker which found eight errors.)  In my case, it is typing errors rather than spelling errors, but I wouldn't copy and paste my text with errors and expect others to clean it up.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ I understand that English is not your native language. I just looked at your contributions to [[Louise Mountbatten]] and you've added a wealth of interesting information. I don't think anyone would complain about an occasional misuse of a word, but I probably cleaned up 30 misspelled words. Even if you do not know the correct English spelling, surely you have access to a spell-checker. In almost all cases, a spell checker picked up the error. If you were to make the corrections proposed by a spell-checker, I think others would be more inclined to clean-up the remaining issues. Does this seem like an unreasonable request? If you do not have a spell-checker, we can talk about how to get one for you. In my case, I compose in an editor with a spell checker, and my browser also has a spell-checker built-in. (As an aside, when I finished writing this post, I invoked my spell-checker which found eight errors.)  In my case, it is typing errors rather than spelling errors, but I wouldn't copy and paste my text with errors and expect others to clean it up.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 00:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
9746 +++$+++ Peter Isotalo +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9745 +++$+++ 9745 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.312134900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Peter Isotalo|Peter]] <sup>[[User talk:Peter Isotalo|Isotalo]]</sup> 10:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
9747 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312146120E09 +++$+++ Yes they [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Aciram&diff=prev&oldid=424626877#Swenglish_..2F._acceptable_English are]. Thank you for asking!  +++$+++ :::Yes they [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aciram&diff=prev&oldid=424626877#Swenglish_..2F._acceptable_English are]. Thank you for asking! [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 14:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
9748 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.312146420E09 +++$+++ You might also wish to be aware of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Sphilbrick#User_doesn.27t_care_about_English the latest two sections here].  +++$+++ :::You might also wish to be aware of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sphilbrick#User_doesn.27t_care_about_English the latest two sections here]. [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 14:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
9749 +++$+++ Peter Isotalo +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312162320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::[[User:Peter Isotalo|Peter]] <sup>[[User talk:Peter Isotalo|Isotalo]]</sup> 18:32, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
9750 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312164120E09 +++$+++ And I'm ever sadder about the sarcasm you used while lecturing me about \"contributing only perfect prose that never has to be altered or improved\". As if I didn't know that. We all make mistakes, but if we make a huge amount of them and know it, and have shown that we don't care, I think we're doing intentional damage that needs to be addressed.  +++$+++ ::::: And I'm ever sadder about the sarcasm you used while lecturing me about "contributing only perfect prose that never has to be altered or improved". As if I didn't know that. We all make mistakes, but if we make a huge amount of them and know it, and have shown that we don't care, I think we're doing intentional damage that needs to be addressed. [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 19:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
9751 +++$+++ Peter Isotalo +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312167360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::::[[User:Peter Isotalo|Peter]] <sup>[[User talk:Peter Isotalo|Isotalo]]</sup> 19:56, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
9752 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.312167960E09 +++$+++ Your views, as  Swede, and mine as a North American, about what is \"perfectly passable English\" are widely different in the extreme, at least in this case. Some [[Swenglish]] added to those articles now hasn't even been corrected yet (mainly because none of us who know Swedish and understand what's intended seem to be willing to do it anymore for this user). I have never even come close to asserting anything like \"lack of perfection\" is the basis of any complaint I've ever made about anything anywhere. Your repeating that adds insult to injury. Stop it! Why don't we leave it at that: we agree to disagree?  +++$+++ :::::::Your views, as  Swede, and mine as a North American, about what is "perfectly passable English" are widely different in the extreme, at least in this case. Some [[Swenglish]] added to those articles now hasn't even been corrected yet (mainly because none of us who know Swedish and understand what's intended seem to be willing to do it anymore for this user). I have never even come close to asserting anything like "lack of perfection" is the basis of any complaint I've ever made about anything anywhere. Your repeating that adds insult to injury. Stop it! Why don't we leave it at that: we agree to disagree? [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 20:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
9753 +++$+++ Peter Isotalo +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.312169580E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::::::[[User:Peter Isotalo|Peter]] <sup>[[User talk:Peter Isotalo|Isotalo]]</sup> 20:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
9754 +++$+++ SergeWoodzing +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312172400E09 +++$+++ '''Trying hard to stick to the subject''' I say: Great! Go for it! Please do specialize in helping Aciram  and enWP correct this inordinate amount of errors from one user! As I've said many times by now, she usually contributes very good material, so it would be just great if people who don't know Swedish would be able to read and understand every word of it. I'm all tuckered out with it, so I really appreciate your good faith attitude on that note. Sincerely,  +++$+++ ::::::::: '''Trying hard to stick to the subject''' I say: Great! Go for it! Please do specialize in helping Aciram  and enWP correct this inordinate amount of errors from one user! As I've said many times by now, she usually contributes very good material, so it would be just great if people who don't know Swedish would be able to read and understand every word of it. I'm all tuckered out with it, so I really appreciate your good faith attitude on that note. Sincerely, [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 21:20, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

271890 +++$+++ Ravedave +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-26 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.164587520E09 +++$+++ The intro does not need references. It is a summary of the rest of the article which provides the support for the intro. -[[User:Ravedave|Ravedave]] <small><sup>( +++$+++ The intro does not need references. It is a summary of the rest of the article which provides the support for the intro. -[[User:Ravedave|Ravedave]] <small><sup>([[User:Ravedave/babyname|help name my baby]])</sup></small> 16:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
271891 +++$+++ Ravedave +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271890 +++$+++ 271890 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.164587820E09 +++$+++ Please discuss any changes to [[Minnesota]] on the talk page as it is going through an FA rght now, thank you. -[[User:Ravedave|Ravedave]] <small><sup>( +++$+++ : Please discuss any changes to [[Minnesota]] on the talk page as it is going through an FA rght now, thank you. -[[User:Ravedave|Ravedave]] <small><sup>([[User:Ravedave/babyname|help name my baby]])</sup></small> 16:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

534035 +++$+++ SMcCandlish +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-24 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.259095440E09 +++$+++ I'm asking you, since you were the deleting admin:  Would you please restore all of the articles deleted as a result of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Grand Prix 2005 (snooker)]], to my userspace, e.g. as [[User:SMcCandlish\/Grand Prix 2005 (snooker)]], etc.?  That AfD simply ripped a hole in that series of articles, half of which are still standing.  The issue with them can be fixed by addition of prose with sources. Or maybe the lot of them can be merged in some way. Or something.  I'd just like to have the content to work on myself, and for [[WP:SNOOKER]] to have a chance to do something with it all that will survive AfD.  It was a lot of work to compile and source all of this perfectly valid information, which does ''not'' violate [[WP:NOT]] except by a pretty torturous [mis?]interpretation of that policy. I'm not disputing your finding of \"delete\" consensus, such as it was (I don't think anyone from [[WP:SNOOKER]] even knew the AfD was happening). I just think the material is reparable, userspacing is commonplace, and I already have a history of fixing nuked articles (see, e.g., [[Albinism in popular culture]], a sourced, stable rewrite of [[Evil albino stereotype]] which was AfD'd into the bit-bucket). \u2014 <b><span style=\"font-family:Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ I'm asking you, since you were the deleting admin:  Would you please restore all of the articles deleted as a result of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Prix 2005 (snooker)]], to my userspace, e.g. as [[User:SMcCandlish/Grand Prix 2005 (snooker)]], etc.?  That AfD simply ripped a hole in that series of articles, half of which are still standing.  The issue with them can be fixed by addition of prose with sources. Or maybe the lot of them can be merged in some way. Or something.  I'd just like to have the content to work on myself, and for [[WP:SNOOKER]] to have a chance to do something with it all that will survive AfD.  It was a lot of work to compile and source all of this perfectly valid information, which does ''not'' violate [[WP:NOT]] except by a pretty torturous [mis?]interpretation of that policy. I'm not disputing your finding of "delete" consensus, such as it was (I don't think anyone from [[WP:SNOOKER]] even knew the AfD was happening). I just think the material is reparable, userspacing is commonplace, and I already have a history of fixing nuked articles (see, e.g., [[Albinism in popular culture]], a sourced, stable rewrite of [[Evil albino stereotype]] which was AfD'd into the bit-bucket). — <b><span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]]</span></b> &#91;[[User talk:SMcCandlish|talk]]&#93; &#91;[[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|cont]]&#93;  <b>‹(-¿-)›</b> 12:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
534036 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534035 +++$+++ 534035 +++$+++ 2009-11-24 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.259122980E09 +++$+++ Sure, no problem. There it is. If you can work on the article, it will be nice because when it was deleted, it was in awfully poor shape... Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Sure, no problem. There it is. If you can work on the article, it will be nice because when it was deleted, it was in awfully poor shape... Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

534037 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534037 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-25 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.259194080E09 +++$+++ Tone, thank you for your continous efforts to improve Wikipedia. I wanted to leave you this note to explain the change to the Kosovo infobox. That change stems from continous discussions and consensus reached. There was a vote that was taken and ended up 10-1 to the change. Please see the discussion page in \"Infobox\", I have made the last three entries (and several others). We cannot have South Ossetia with one infobox and Kosovo with three. The merge into one single infobox with a coat of arms and flags was needed and was successfully made. Thank you for your time.  +++$+++ Tone, thank you for your continous efforts to improve Wikipedia. I wanted to leave you this note to explain the change to the Kosovo infobox. That change stems from continous discussions and consensus reached. There was a vote that was taken and ended up 10-1 to the change. Please see the discussion page in "Infobox", I have made the last three entries (and several others). We cannot have South Ossetia with one infobox and Kosovo with three. The merge into one single infobox with a coat of arms and flags was needed and was successfully made. Thank you for your time. [[user:sulmues]]----Sulmues 16:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
534038 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534037 +++$+++ 534037 +++$+++ 2009-11-25 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.259195640E09 +++$+++ This is somehow better with all the improvements than the version I've reverted but I am pretty sure that not everyone will find that this a consensus. Anyway, this is not a priority topic for me at the moment so I'm staying out of this discussion. --''' +++$+++ : This is somehow better with all the improvements than the version I've reverted but I am pretty sure that not everyone will find that this a consensus. Anyway, this is not a priority topic for me at the moment so I'm staying out of this discussion. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:34, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

263769 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-26 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.156643640E09 +++$+++ All editors, please see discussion here [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of Smallville episodes]]  +++$+++ All editors, please see discussion here [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Smallville episodes]] [[User:Bignole|Bignole]] 18:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
263770 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263769 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-28 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.156790820E09 +++$+++ My judgement and vote is clear on the AFD page. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::My judgement and vote is clear on the AFD page. Thanks. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

534042 +++$+++ J04n +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534042 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-02 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.259747460E09 +++$+++ Hi, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind extending the discussion for a day or two.  One of the participants in the discussion brought it up just today at [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (music)]] and I think that the discussion there should run its course before this AfD is closed.  Thank you <font face=\"Century Gothic\"> +++$+++ Hi, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind extending the discussion for a day or two.  One of the participants in the discussion brought it up just today at [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (music)]] and I think that the discussion there should run its course before this AfD is closed.  Thank you <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</font> 01:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
534043 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534042 +++$+++ 534042 +++$+++ 2009-12-02 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.259803500E09 +++$+++ Sure, this sounds reasonable. I've relisted the discussion. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Sure, this sounds reasonable. I've relisted the discussion. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
534044 +++$+++ J04n +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534042 +++$+++ 534043 +++$+++ 2009-12-02 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.259810820E09 +++$+++ Thanks, can the page be undeleted? <font face=\"Century Gothic\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks, can the page be undeleted? <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</font> 19:27, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
534045 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534042 +++$+++ 534044 +++$+++ 2009-12-02 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.259821140E09 +++$+++ Oops, forgot that... fixed now ;-) --''' +++$+++ ::: Oops, forgot that... fixed now ;-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
534046 +++$+++ J04n +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534042 +++$+++ 534045 +++$+++ 2009-12-02 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.259825160E09 +++$+++ Thanks <font face=\"Century Gothic\"> +++$+++ ::::Thanks <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</font> 23:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

9755 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9755 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.312322640E09 +++$+++ I could report you for your breaks against Wikiquette, and if you do continue, I will not hesitate to do so. I have corrected my spelling errors on your request, so you should correct your attitude on mine. Thank you-- +++$+++ I could report you for your breaks against Wikiquette, and if you do continue, I will not hesitate to do so. I have corrected my spelling errors on your request, so you should correct your attitude on mine. Thank you--[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram#top|talk]]) 15:04, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
9756 +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ Aciram +++$+++ 9755 +++$+++ 9755 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312323000E09 +++$+++ I would also like to express my gratitude to @Peter Isotalo for his support, and for his help in explaining the rules to me. -- +++$+++ :I would also like to express my gratitude to @Peter Isotalo for his support, and for his help in explaining the rules to me. --[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram#top|talk]]) 15:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

271900 +++$+++ JackWilliams +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271900 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-08 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.173349440E09 +++$+++ Hello.  I live in the Phoenix metro area.  I feel it is misleading to say that Phoenix is the 6th largest-city in the United States without qualifying the statement.  The metro Phoenix area is moderate in size-- it is the 14th-largest metro area in the U. S.  Phoenix is the 6th largest city by virtue of the fact that it has enormous city limits.  This is why I feel it is crucial to put the information about the area within the Phoenix city limits at the top of the [[Phoenix, Arizona]] page.  In the case of Phoenix, area is not \"esoteric.\"  Area is relevant for Phoenix.  It explains why a city like Phoenix is ranked #6 in population in the U. S. when the Phoenix metro area is only #14 in the country.   +++$+++ Hello.  I live in the Phoenix metro area.  I feel it is misleading to say that Phoenix is the 6th largest-city in the United States without qualifying the statement.  The metro Phoenix area is moderate in size-- it is the 14th-largest metro area in the U. S.  Phoenix is the 6th largest city by virtue of the fact that it has enormous city limits.  This is why I feel it is crucial to put the information about the area within the Phoenix city limits at the top of the [[Phoenix, Arizona]] page.  In the case of Phoenix, area is not "esoteric."  Area is relevant for Phoenix.  It explains why a city like Phoenix is ranked #6 in population in the U. S. when the Phoenix metro area is only #14 in the country.  [[User:JackWilliams|JackWilliams]] 02:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
271901 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271900 +++$+++ 271900 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.173351540E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... not sure I agree with this.  Houston is 9th largest in area, is the fourth-largest in city limits, but still retains 7th in metro area.  Los Angeles is actually slightly larger area-wise than Phoenix, yet it still achieves 2nd largerst metro area.  I'd chalk this up to Houston and Phoenix being in the newly developing sunbelt, places which have not yet had had time to build the influence of a large metro area but that's just my idea.  Better to state population and metro population and let reader decide.  I don't think adding area is pertinent enough to warrant mention in the intro paragraph.-- +++$+++ :Hmmm... not sure I agree with this.  Houston is 9th largest in area, is the fourth-largest in city limits, but still retains 7th in metro area.  Los Angeles is actually slightly larger area-wise than Phoenix, yet it still achieves 2nd largerst metro area.  I'd chalk this up to Houston and Phoenix being in the newly developing sunbelt, places which have not yet had had time to build the influence of a large metro area but that's just my idea.  Better to state population and metro population and let reader decide.  I don't think adding area is pertinent enough to warrant mention in the intro paragraph.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 02:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

271904 +++$+++ SusanLesch +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.175871000E09 +++$+++ Hello, Loodog. Do you think [[Minneapolis, Minnesota]] is ready for featured article candidate (FAC)? I see a few weaknesses but no reason not to try. - +++$+++ Hello, Loodog. Do you think [[Minneapolis, Minnesota]] is ready for featured article candidate (FAC)? I see a few weaknesses but no reason not to try. -[[User:Susanlesch|Susanlesch]] 07:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
271905 +++$+++ SusanLesch +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271904 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.175984520E09 +++$+++ Your review was enouraging, and thanks for taking time to edit, too. I made one change to the TOC (having only one item with second level headings looked funny so I moved health to a new section with utilites like [[Boston]]) and decided to hold off a bit before FAC. - +++$+++ ::*Your review was enouraging, and thanks for taking time to edit, too. I made one change to the TOC (having only one item with second level headings looked funny so I moved health to a new section with utilites like [[Boston]]) and decided to hold off a bit before FAC. -[[User:Susanlesch|Susanlesch]] 15:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

9763 +++$+++ Abd +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-05 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.286327280E09 +++$+++ I'm out of here, it's way too much work for too little result. Thanks for your efforts, but it's not been enough. -- +++$+++ I'm out of here, it's way too much work for too little result. Thanks for your efforts, but it's not been enough. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 18:08, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
9764 +++$+++ Kevin_baas +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9763 +++$+++ 9763 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.286335920E09 +++$+++ from my experience wikipedia has a strong bias towards pseudoskepticism.  esp. given obstinate psuedoskeptical editors like kirk and science apologist who are allowed to run rampant on wikipedia while people who are guided more by reason are sternly punished on questionable justification for minor things.  and then your average person \/ editor isn't going to look to in depth to the details and probably doesn't have a very scientifically \/ logically disciplined mind, anyways.  and lacking in-depth knowledge of the stuff, they seem to take a conservative stance by default.   so you get what you get.  and i don't think that's going to change.  so i've kind of learned to live with it.  science will go on.  meanwhile, pseudoskeptics will continue to be allowed to run rampant on wikipedia, keeping it decades behind.  it's a sad state, surely.  but fortunately it's not too important.  real work will continue to go on in the labs.  that's what counts.  there will always be the bible-thumpers.  but all the bible-thumping in the world can't stop scientific and technological progress.  +++$+++ :from my experience wikipedia has a strong bias towards pseudoskepticism.  esp. given obstinate psuedoskeptical editors like kirk and science apologist who are allowed to run rampant on wikipedia while people who are guided more by reason are sternly punished on questionable justification for minor things.  and then your average person / editor isn't going to look to in depth to the details and probably doesn't have a very scientifically / logically disciplined mind, anyways.  and lacking in-depth knowledge of the stuff, they seem to take a conservative stance by default.   so you get what you get.  and i don't think that's going to change.  so i've kind of learned to live with it.  science will go on.  meanwhile, pseudoskeptics will continue to be allowed to run rampant on wikipedia, keeping it decades behind.  it's a sad state, surely.  but fortunately it's not too important.  real work will continue to go on in the labs.  that's what counts.  there will always be the bible-thumpers.  but all the bible-thumping in the world can't stop scientific and technological progress. [[User:Kevin_Baas|Kevin Baas]]<sup>[[User_talk:Kevin_Baas|talk]]</sup> 20:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
9765 +++$+++ Kevin_baas +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9763 +++$+++ 9763 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.286336340E09 +++$+++ ...and one day they'll wake up in world that they can't understand.  so they'll start postulating some extra-wordly power to explain it, and they'll prostelytize to each other for comfort, and... oh, wait... that's already happened, hasn't it?  +++$+++ :...and one day they'll wake up in world that they can't understand.  so they'll start postulating some extra-wordly power to explain it, and they'll prostelytize to each other for comfort, and... oh, wait... that's already happened, hasn't it? [[User:Kevin_Baas|Kevin Baas]]<sup>[[User_talk:Kevin_Baas|talk]]</sup> 20:39, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
9766 +++$+++ Abd +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9763 +++$+++ 9765 +++$+++ 2010-10-15 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.287203820E09 +++$+++ Why are convenience links important? Well, the more eyes on the sources, the better the article. I've seen a source behind a paywall be misrepresented, in a high-interest, high-traffic article, for more than a year. Obviously, nobody went to a library except the original writer who had misrepresented it! Besides, being able to read the sources directly and easily helps readers comprehend the subject more deeply. -- +++$+++ ::Why are convenience links important? Well, the more eyes on the sources, the better the article. I've seen a source behind a paywall be misrepresented, in a high-interest, high-traffic article, for more than a year. Obviously, nobody went to a library except the original writer who had misrepresented it! Besides, being able to read the sources directly and easily helps readers comprehend the subject more deeply. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 21:37, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
9767 +++$+++ Kevin_baas +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9763 +++$+++ 9766 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.287270300E09 +++$+++ yeah i pretty much agree with you, esp. on why the links are important.  but as regards copyvio, well as you said he's had a few take down notices, and from my experience wikipedia is really anal about copyvio (and for good reason - they're licensing it gfdl which means they have to cover not only their own butts, but everyone who uses their content's butts.), i've even had a possible copyvio notice put on my profile pic.  i took the picture!  did i ask myself for permission?  did i give it?  what if i didn't?  am i then to sue ''myself''?  so point being that does seem like a reasonable argument.  i don't know the policy details and all that, but in any case it's a lot better than the bla bla bla i've been getting so far so they at least deserve a little acknowledgement for that.   and in any case i'm more than happy to shift my focus to the proposed explanations sections, where its seems there is a lot of progress that can be made on the article (there is certainly much room for improvement).  +++$+++ :::yeah i pretty much agree with you, esp. on why the links are important.  but as regards copyvio, well as you said he's had a few take down notices, and from my experience wikipedia is really anal about copyvio (and for good reason - they're licensing it gfdl which means they have to cover not only their own butts, but everyone who uses their content's butts.), i've even had a possible copyvio notice put on my profile pic.  i took the picture!  did i ask myself for permission?  did i give it?  what if i didn't?  am i then to sue ''myself''?  so point being that does seem like a reasonable argument.  i don't know the policy details and all that, but in any case it's a lot better than the bla bla bla i've been getting so far so they at least deserve a little acknowledgement for that.   and in any case i'm more than happy to shift my focus to the proposed explanations sections, where its seems there is a lot of progress that can be made on the article (there is certainly much room for improvement). [[User:Kevin_Baas|Kevin Baas]]<sup>[[User_talk:Kevin_Baas|talk]]</sup> 16:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

534053 +++$+++ Cvelderman +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-15 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.260864780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Cvelderman|Cvelderman]] ([[User talk:Cvelderman|talk]]) 00:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
534054 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534053 +++$+++ 534053 +++$+++ 2009-12-15 09:06:00 +++$+++ 1.260896760E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process. In such cases, if there are any objections over deletion, the article can be brought back. Would you liek me to do that? Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted in the prod process. In such cases, if there are any objections over deletion, the article can be brought back. Would you liek me to do that? Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:06, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

534055 +++$+++ Cargoking +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534055 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-22 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.261544940E09 +++$+++ |text = '''Tone''', <br \/><br \/> Wishing you and your family a very joyful end of 2009, and the best of wishes for the coming year. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia, maybe take some time out to spend it with loved ones. <br \/><br \/> Seasons Greetings, <br \/> <small> <span style=\"border:2px solid #000;padding:1px;\">&nbsp;[[User:Cargoking|<font style=\"color:#000080;\">'''Cargoking'''<\/font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Cargoking|<font style=\"color:#f9f9f9;background:#000000;\">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;<\/font>]]<\/span><\/small> <sup> +++$+++ |text = '''Tone''', <br /><br /> Wishing you and your family a very joyful end of 2009, and the best of wishes for the coming year. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia, maybe take some time out to spend it with loved ones. <br /><br /> Seasons Greetings, <br /> <small> <span style="border:2px solid #000;padding:1px;">&nbsp;[[User:Cargoking|<font style="color:#000080;">'''Cargoking'''</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Cargoking|<font style="color:#f9f9f9;background:#000000;">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> <sup>[[User:Cargoking/Christmas/1|Happy Chirstmas]]</sup> 21:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
534056 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534055 +++$+++ 534055 +++$+++ 2009-12-23 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.261629480E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted after a [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of camera clubs in Ireland|discussion]]. Simply, the reason was that WP is not a directory. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted after a [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of camera clubs in Ireland|discussion]]. Simply, the reason was that WP is not a directory. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:38, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

9768 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9768 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-11 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.286833020E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not use talk pages such as [[Talk:Fox News Channel]] for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#FORUM|not to be used as a forum or chat room]]. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting [[Wikipedia:Reference desk|our reference desk]] and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|here]] for more information. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-chat2 --> [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]<\/sup> +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not use talk pages such as [[Talk:Fox News Channel]] for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#FORUM|not to be used as a forum or chat room]]. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting [[Wikipedia:Reference desk|our reference desk]] and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|here]] for more information. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-chat2 --> [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup>[[User:Heimstern/Ignoring incivility|Advice]]</small> 14:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
9769 +++$+++ Kevin_baas +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9768 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-10-11 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.286833260E09 +++$+++ i am aware of the policy.  it is generally considered good form in discussions, esp. ones that can get stressful, to occasionally make a small light-hearted quip to lighten the mood.  all the better if it is relevant to the facts and issues being discussed.  +++$+++ ::i am aware of the policy.  it is generally considered good form in discussions, esp. ones that can get stressful, to occasionally make a small light-hearted quip to lighten the mood.  all the better if it is relevant to the facts and issues being discussed. [[User:Kevin_Baas|Kevin Baas]]<sup>[[User_talk:Kevin_Baas|talk]]</sup> 14:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
9770 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9768 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.286922000E09 +++$+++ I am sure you are aware of the policy; hence the word \"reminder\". On a controversial topic, please be careful that your \"light-hearted quips\" are not perceived as aggressive, dismissive, or disparaging, or they could have the opposite effect. One puppy's opinion. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]<\/sup> +++$+++ ::I am sure you are aware of the policy; hence the word "reminder". On a controversial topic, please be careful that your "light-hearted quips" are not perceived as aggressive, dismissive, or disparaging, or they could have the opposite effect. One puppy's opinion. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup>[[User:Heimstern/Ignoring incivility|Advice]]</small> 15:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

534057 +++$+++ Shirik +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-25 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.261751400E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone. If you get a chance, could you check the conversation at [[Wikipedia_talk:In_the_news#Contributions]]? Just a discussion about a [[WP:ITN]] posting you did that you may have forgotten credits on. Thanks! -- +++$+++ Hi Tone. If you get a chance, could you check the conversation at [[Wikipedia_talk:In_the_news#Contributions]]? Just a discussion about a [[WP:ITN]] posting you did that you may have forgotten credits on. Thanks! --[[User:Shirik|Shirik]] ([[User talk:Shirik|talk]]) 06:30, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
534058 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534057 +++$+++ 534057 +++$+++ 2009-12-25 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.261767900E09 +++$+++ Hi. I was never a fan of posting those credits... Could someone else do that? Thanks. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I was never a fan of posting those credits... Could someone else do that? Thanks. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:05, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

271915 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271915 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-23 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.179917280E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your contributions and pictures to [[Curl]]. I have one suggestion however. It would be great if the pictures you put in were of higher resolution, and preferable in png, which is not blurry and which is better suited for line art. I wonder what you think. You can reply here. Thanks.  +++$+++ Thank you for your contributions and pictures to [[Curl]]. I have one suggestion however. It would be great if the pictures you put in were of higher resolution, and preferable in png, which is not blurry and which is better suited for line art. I wonder what you think. You can reply here. Thanks. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 03:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
271916 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271915 +++$+++ 271915 +++$+++ 2007-05-23 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.179917520E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, I did in the crudest way: plotted everything in Mathematica and copy-pasted to MS Paint.  This is pretty much the only way I know, but if you have a method of getting clearer images, it would certainly make the article easier to understand.-- +++$+++ :Unfortunately, I did in the crudest way: plotted everything in Mathematica and copy-pasted to MS Paint.  This is pretty much the only way I know, but if you have a method of getting clearer images, it would certainly make the article easier to understand.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 03:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
271917 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271915 +++$+++ 271916 +++$+++ 2007-05-23 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.179918180E09 +++$+++ It should be possible to export from mathematica to eps I believe, or even to other formats, like png or gif (maybe from the \"File\" menu). Could you try and see if it works?  +++$+++ :: It should be possible to export from mathematica to eps I believe, or even to other formats, like png or gif (maybe from the "File" menu). Could you try and see if it works? [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 04:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
271918 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271915 +++$+++ 271917 +++$+++ 2007-05-23 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.179919560E09 +++$+++ Not that I can figure out.-- +++$+++ :::Not that I can figure out.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 04:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
271919 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271915 +++$+++ 271918 +++$+++ 2007-05-23 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.179919800E09 +++$+++ I see. Perhaps you could post the code at each of the pictures (which is a good idea in general anway), then I can try to fix them tomorrow (I don't have mathematica at home, but have at school).  +++$+++ :::: I see. Perhaps you could post the code at each of the pictures (which is a good idea in general anway), then I can try to fix them tomorrow (I don't have mathematica at home, but have at school). [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 04:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

9773 +++$+++ Soxwon +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-12 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.294821840E09 +++$+++ I'm kind of curious on what you considered so outlandish? Yes I agree, his reasoning is shaky (basing his argument on ad hominems, a single Harvard study, and CBO's fallibility) but he did raise one or two decent points. What makes this so bad?  +++$+++ I'm kind of curious on what you considered so outlandish? Yes I agree, his reasoning is shaky (basing his argument on ad hominems, a single Harvard study, and CBO's fallibility) but he did raise one or two decent points. What makes this so bad? [[User:Soxwon|Soxwon]] ([[User talk:Soxwon|talk]]) 00:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
9774 +++$+++ Soxwon +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9773 +++$+++ 9773 +++$+++ 2011-01-12 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.294822680E09 +++$+++ I am referring to the section that he watched (and sorry, my mistake, discrediting WSJ economists for ties would actually be Guilt by Association), and honestly having watched it, I was skeptical of the section on the economy and jobs.  +++$+++ :I am referring to the section that he watched (and sorry, my mistake, discrediting WSJ economists for ties would actually be Guilt by Association), and honestly having watched it, I was skeptical of the section on the economy and jobs. [[User:Soxwon|Soxwon]] ([[User talk:Soxwon|talk]]) 00:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
9775 +++$+++ Kevin_baas +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9773 +++$+++ 9774 +++$+++ 2011-01-12 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.294830180E09 +++$+++ soxwon, maybe it had a few decent points, but i didn't watch the whole thing so i don't know.  but one logical error or fallacy is enough to destroy an entire argument, and he just kept making one after the other after the other and they were all quite egregious and it was really starting to disgust me.  so i had to turn it off.  maybe if i watched the whole thing i might have seen a decent point or two, but certainly not enough to redeem the caricature of illogic and just plain making things up that i saw in just the first few minutes.  i have a low tolerance for that kind of stuff.  +++$+++ ::soxwon, maybe it had a few decent points, but i didn't watch the whole thing so i don't know.  but one logical error or fallacy is enough to destroy an entire argument, and he just kept making one after the other after the other and they were all quite egregious and it was really starting to disgust me.  so i had to turn it off.  maybe if i watched the whole thing i might have seen a decent point or two, but certainly not enough to redeem the caricature of illogic and just plain making things up that i saw in just the first few minutes.  i have a low tolerance for that kind of stuff. [[User:Kevin_Baas|Kevin Baas]]<sup>[[User_talk:Kevin_Baas|talk]]</sup> 03:03, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

525917 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525917 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-05 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.144305060E09 +++$+++ ther original Robert Brooks article was twofold, combining the football player and the congressman. I split the article into separate articles. Upon further research, Brooks is in fact a State Representative rather than a congressman, so I will probably request a deletion over him being non-notable. Thanks for pointing that out though. -- +++$+++ ther original Robert Brooks article was twofold, combining the football player and the congressman. I split the article into separate articles. Upon further research, Brooks is in fact a State Representative rather than a congressman, so I will probably request a deletion over him being non-notable. Thanks for pointing that out though. --[[User:Wizardman|Wizardman]] 23:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
525918 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525917 +++$+++ 525917 +++$+++ 2006-04-05 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.144306740E09 +++$+++ Actually, he is not even a state representative - rather a candidate.  &mdash; +++$+++ *Actually, he is not even a state representative - rather a candidate.  &mdash;[[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] @ 23:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

271920 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-23 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.179919920E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ Cheers, [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 04:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
271921 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271920 +++$+++ 271920 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.179995940E09 +++$+++ So, as follow up of the above, are you reluctant to part with the dearly written mathematica code? :)  +++$+++ : So, as follow up of the above, are you reluctant to part with the dearly written mathematica code? :) [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 01:39, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
271922 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271920 +++$+++ 271921 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.180168800E09 +++$+++ Sure, replace whatever to improve it.  I won't be offended.-- +++$+++ ::Sure, replace whatever to improve it.  I won't be offended.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 01:40, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
271923 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271920 +++$+++ 271922 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.180176420E09 +++$+++ Loodog, you misunderstood me I think. I am very happy with your pictures. :) All I wanted is to recreate them with higher resolution, for that I would need your original code. If that's fine with you. So I won't replace the pictures, except for the resolution.  +++$+++ ::: Loodog, you misunderstood me I think. I am very happy with your pictures. :) All I wanted is to recreate them with higher resolution, for that I would need your original code. If that's fine with you. So I won't replace the pictures, except for the resolution. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 03:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

9779 +++$+++ Magog the Ogre +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9779 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-23 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.298470740E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove [[Template:Ffd|files for deletion notices]] or [[Template:Puf|possibly unfree files notices]] from pages, or remove other people's comments the discussions. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please [[Wikipedia:Guide to deletion|comment]] at the respective page instead. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-afd1 -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove [[Template:Ffd|files for deletion notices]] or [[Template:Puf|possibly unfree files notices]] from pages, or remove other people's comments the discussions. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please [[Wikipedia:Guide to deletion|comment]] at the respective page instead. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-afd1 --> [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 06:19, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
9780 +++$+++ Kevin_baas +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9779 +++$+++ 9779 +++$+++ 2011-02-23 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.298499000E09 +++$+++ sorry, i thought one was supposed to remove the notice when it was no longer applicable.  and in this case it's plainly obvious.  i have not removed anyone's comments and i resent the implication.   +++$+++ :sorry, i thought one was supposed to remove the notice when it was no longer applicable.  and in this case it's plainly obvious.  i have not removed anyone's comments and i resent the implication.  [[User:Kevin_Baas|Kevin Baas]]<sup>[[User_talk:Kevin_Baas|talk]]</sup> 14:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

271924 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-26 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.180181280E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 05:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
271925 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271924 +++$+++ 271924 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.180181640E09 +++$+++ Cool. I'll get to this after Memorial Day.  +++$+++ : Cool. I'll get to this after Memorial Day. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 05:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

532797 +++$+++ Hahnchen +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-07 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.181275680E09 +++$+++ You seem to have deleted the article.  Although the last time I saw it, it was a redirect to [[Kidnapping]], it did have a article history with non sub-stub entries.  Take a look at the deletion log and the DRV at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\/Log\/2007 June 2]]. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[Evil|<span title=\"WP:Esperanza\"><font color=\"green\">e<\/font><\/span>]] +++$+++ You seem to have deleted the article.  Although the last time I saw it, it was a redirect to [[Kidnapping]], it did have a article history with non sub-stub entries.  Take a look at the deletion log and the DRV at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 June 2]]. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[Evil|<span title="WP:Esperanza"><font color="green">e</font></span>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 21:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
532798 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532797 +++$+++ 532797 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.181276460E09 +++$+++ If I understood correctly, this article was nominated for deletion, the result was to delete and the useful content was moved into another article. A redrect doesn't make much sense, does it? --''' +++$+++ : If I understood correctly, this article was nominated for deletion, the result was to delete and the useful content was moved into another article. A redrect doesn't make much sense, does it? --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 21:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
532799 +++$+++ Hahnchen +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532797 +++$+++ 532798 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.181277660E09 +++$+++ There hasn't been an AFD nomination.  A procedural one was opened and quickly (erroneously) shot down, when an administrator speedily deleted the article, pretty much ignoring all arguments at DRV apart from those which were congruent to his own.  The same administrator, after some prodding by another administrator ([[User_talk:Doc_glasgow#AfD_Kach]]), then restored it.  It was made into a redirect (albeit without discussion).  I am guessing that some user swapped it to a substub, and then tagged it to try and illicit a backdoor speedy, which is where you come in.  I'm sure that when you looked at the empty article (or whatever it was), it looked like a speedy candidate, but what was in the history was a sourced article on a kidnapping case. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[Evil|<span title=\"WP:Esperanza\"><font color=\"green\">e<\/font><\/span>]] +++$+++ ::There hasn't been an AFD nomination.  A procedural one was opened and quickly (erroneously) shot down, when an administrator speedily deleted the article, pretty much ignoring all arguments at DRV apart from those which were congruent to his own.  The same administrator, after some prodding by another administrator ([[User_talk:Doc_glasgow#AfD_Kach]]), then restored it.  It was made into a redirect (albeit without discussion).  I am guessing that some user swapped it to a substub, and then tagged it to try and illicit a backdoor speedy, which is where you come in.  I'm sure that when you looked at the empty article (or whatever it was), it looked like a speedy candidate, but what was in the history was a sourced article on a kidnapping case. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[Evil|<span title="WP:Esperanza"><font color="green">e</font></span>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 21:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
532800 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532797 +++$+++ 532799 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.181277960E09 +++$+++ Ok, I'll restore it. Actually, I checked what was going on with the article before and I thought the problem was resolved and contents moved somewhere else. Complicated one... --''' +++$+++ ::: Ok, I'll restore it. Actually, I checked what was going on with the article before and I thought the problem was resolved and contents moved somewhere else. Complicated one... --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 21:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

9782 +++$+++ Kmhkmh +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9782 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-21 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.308657780E09 +++$+++ Might be trouble brewing in there. In particular the Maryland study seems to become subject to gaming again.-- +++$+++ Might be trouble brewing in there. In particular the Maryland study seems to become subject to gaming again.--[[User:Kmhkmh|Kmhkmh]] ([[User talk:Kmhkmh|talk]]) 05:03, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
9783 +++$+++ Kevin_baas +++$+++ Kevin Baas +++$+++ 9782 +++$+++ 9782 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.308720420E09 +++$+++ Gaaahh!!!  Thanks for the notice.  +++$+++ :Gaaahh!!!  Thanks for the notice. [[User:Kevin_Baas|Kevin Baas]]<sup>[[User_talk:Kevin_Baas|talk]]</sup> 22:27, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

271928 +++$+++ Black Harry +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-04 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.181020200E09 +++$+++ --''' +++$+++ --'''[[User:Black Harry|<span style="color:black">BH</span>]]''' [[User Talk:Black Harry|(Talk)]] 22:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
271929 +++$+++ Black Harry +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271928 +++$+++ 271928 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.181043720E09 +++$+++ in regards to [[User:71.235.81.39]] I already started a thread on him at [[WP:ANI]], after he vandalize\/trolled on my talk page ''' +++$+++ :in regards to [[User:71.235.81.39]] I already started a thread on him at [[WP:ANI]], after he vandalize/trolled on my talk page '''[[User:Black Harry|<span style="color:black">BH</span>]]''' [[User Talk:Black Harry|(Talk)]] 04:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
271930 +++$+++ Black Harry +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271928 +++$+++ 271929 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.181094360E09 +++$+++ You know I think that the longer that thread on WP:ANI stays up, the more he'll make a fool of himself, and the chances of him getting blocked will only increase.  He just posted another rant on the thread, and he's still calling us propagandists. ''' +++$+++ ::You know I think that the longer that thread on WP:ANI stays up, the more he'll make a fool of himself, and the chances of him getting blocked will only increase.  He just posted another rant on the thread, and he's still calling us propagandists. '''[[User:Black Harry|<span style="color:black">BH</span>]]''' [[User Talk:Black Harry|(Talk)]] 18:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

9785 +++$+++ OlEnglish +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9785 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-13 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.279048620E09 +++$+++ .. Too bad it was just recently reverted though. --  +++$+++ .. Too bad it was just recently reverted though. -- [[User:OlEnglish|<font size="5">&oelig;</font>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>&trade;</sup>]] 12:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
9786 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9785 +++$+++ 9785 +++$+++ 2010-07-13 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.279061400E09 +++$+++ For now the page itself can still be found here: [[User:Petri Krohn\/Best hat texts]] --  +++$+++ :For now the page itself can still be found here: [[User:Petri Krohn/Best hat texts]] -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 15:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
9787 +++$+++ OlEnglish +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9785 +++$+++ 9786 +++$+++ 2010-07-14 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.279170360E09 +++$+++ Thing is.. I actually thought that those anus\/anal hatnotes were serious at first! But you have a good point. We don't want to be [[WP:DENY|feeding the trolls]]. A lot of people have their own \"Funny vandalism\"-type lists but I've found most of them are usually witty\/intelligent vandalism, the kind of stuff you'd find at [[WP:BJAODN]], rather than inane, immature fart humor (although, admittedly, I'm a kid at heart, and can't help but snicker at things like this \"[[FL Fart]]\", or \"[[Ho Fuk Yan]]\", I guess I'm just a fan of bilingual [[heteronym]]s and [[mondegreen]]s :). I used to have a list of \"funny edit summaries\" and \"funny usernames\" but I git rid of it. What's left of it is at one of my [[User:OlEnglish\/Useful_links_and_bookmarks#Interesting user names|subpages]] if you're interested. --  +++$+++ ::Thing is.. I actually thought that those anus/anal hatnotes were serious at first! But you have a good point. We don't want to be [[WP:DENY|feeding the trolls]]. A lot of people have their own "Funny vandalism"-type lists but I've found most of them are usually witty/intelligent vandalism, the kind of stuff you'd find at [[WP:BJAODN]], rather than inane, immature fart humor (although, admittedly, I'm a kid at heart, and can't help but snicker at things like this "[[FL Fart]]", or "[[Ho Fuk Yan]]", I guess I'm just a fan of bilingual [[heteronym]]s and [[mondegreen]]s :). I used to have a list of "funny edit summaries" and "funny usernames" but I git rid of it. What's left of it is at one of my [[User:OlEnglish/Useful_links_and_bookmarks#Interesting user names|subpages]] if you're interested. -- [[User:OlEnglish|<font size="5">&oelig;</font>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>&trade;</sup>]] 22:06, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

534074 +++$+++ Tadija +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-10 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.263190080E09 +++$+++ I am deeply sorry, Tone! I really didn't understand, so i wanted to make all vote cleaner. Sorry again... :) - +++$+++ I am deeply sorry, Tone! I really didn't understand, so i wanted to make all vote cleaner. Sorry again... :) -[[User:Tadija|Tadija]] ([[User talk:Tadija|talk]]) 22:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
534075 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534074 +++$+++ 534074 +++$+++ 2010-01-10 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.263190140E09 +++$+++ No problem, just be careful in the future ;-) --''' +++$+++ : No problem, just be careful in the future ;-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

271931 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271931 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.181081520E09 +++$+++ Editor, I've noticed your contributions to the [[Providence, Rhode Island]] article.  I've just nominated it for Featured Article status.-- +++$+++ Editor, I've noticed your contributions to the [[Providence, Rhode Island]] article.  I've just nominated it for Featured Article status.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 15:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
271932 +++$+++ Threeafterthree +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271931 +++$+++ 271931 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.181081580E09 +++$+++ Cool! If you need assistance, please advise. Thanks! -- +++$+++ :Cool! If you need assistance, please advise. Thanks! --[[User:Threeafterthree|Tom]] 15:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
271933 +++$+++ Pentawing +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271931 +++$+++ 271931 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.181115000E09 +++$+++ I'll see what I can do this weekend (I am pretty busy during the weekdays).  +++$+++ :I'll see what I can do this weekend (I am pretty busy during the weekdays). [[User:Pentawing|Pentawing]]<sup>[[User_talk:Pentawing|Talk]]</sup> 00:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
271934 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271931 +++$+++ 271933 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.181115060E09 +++$+++ Thanks!-- +++$+++ ::Thanks!--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 00:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

9788 +++$+++ Stevertigo +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-13 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.279069320E09 +++$+++ I've responded on my talk. Regards, -[[User:Stevertigo|Stevertigo]] ( +++$+++ I've responded on my talk. Regards, -[[User:Stevertigo|Stevertigo]] ([[User:Stevertigo/Log|w]] | [[User_talk:Stevertigo|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Stevertigo|e]]) 18:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
9789 +++$+++ Stevertigo +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9788 +++$+++ 9788 +++$+++ 2010-07-13 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.279071900E09 +++$+++ Again. -[[User:Stevertigo|Stevertigo]] ( +++$+++ :Again. -[[User:Stevertigo|Stevertigo]] ([[User:Stevertigo/Log|w]] | [[User_talk:Stevertigo|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/Stevertigo|e]]) 18:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

534077 +++$+++ Joe Chill +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-12 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.263360480E09 +++$+++ You closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/ISCT:ISCSI-Test-Tool]] as delete, but you didn't delete the article.  +++$+++ You closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISCT:ISCSI-Test-Tool]] as delete, but you didn't delete the article. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 21:28, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
534078 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534077 +++$+++ 534077 +++$+++ 2010-01-12 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.263362400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for notice. Fixed now. --''' +++$+++ : Thanks for notice. Fixed now. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:00, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

9791 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9791 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-19 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.279584780E09 +++$+++ It's a self-published book, see [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=jD0gTGKAoz0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Torsten+Timm&hl=en&ei=1YZETJLZC4_P4garpt24Dg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false]. Not a reliable source. Thanks.  +++$+++ It's a self-published book, see [http://books.google.com/books?id=jD0gTGKAoz0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Torsten+Timm&hl=en&ei=1YZETJLZC4_P4garpt24Dg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false]. Not a reliable source. Thanks. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 17:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
9792 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9791 +++$+++ 9791 +++$+++ 2010-07-19 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.279584900E09 +++$+++ Calm down, will get back to you in just a moment. --  +++$+++ :Calm down, will get back to you in just a moment. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 17:15, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
9793 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9791 +++$+++ 9792 +++$+++ 2010-07-19 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.279588140E09 +++$+++ Calm down? I'll admit it's hot here, but my fan keeps me cool. :-)  I've replied on the article talk page.  +++$+++ ::Calm down? I'll admit it's hot here, but my fan keeps me cool. :-)  I've replied on the article talk page. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 18:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

271936 +++$+++ Wolfdog1 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271936 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-08 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.181299620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Wolfdog1|Wolfdog1]] 03:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
271937 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271936 +++$+++ 271936 +++$+++ 2007-06-08 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.181305980E09 +++$+++ As for my removal of projections, again, no other cities have this.  We don't prophesize populations.  There's even a tag for wikipedia being used as an oracle: <nowiki>{{prophecy}}<\/nowiki>.  Demographics is more a reflection of actual data gathered, though the tradition has been to allow one estimate for present day, which can never be more than 9 years from last actual census.-- +++$+++ :As for my removal of projections, again, no other cities have this.  We don't prophesize populations.  There's even a tag for wikipedia being used as an oracle: <nowiki>{{prophecy}}</nowiki>.  Demographics is more a reflection of actual data gathered, though the tradition has been to allow one estimate for present day, which can never be more than 9 years from last actual census.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 05:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

271938 +++$+++ Black Harry +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-08 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.181306340E09 +++$+++ Hi, we've met before, notably on the New England article and talk page.  I've done alot of work at [[WP:RFA]], voting on candidates to be administrators.  I was wondering if you would accept a nomination to become one.  ''' +++$+++ Hi, we've met before, notably on the New England article and talk page.  I've done alot of work at [[WP:RFA]], voting on candidates to be administrators.  I was wondering if you would accept a nomination to become one.  '''[[User:Black Harry|<span style="color:black">BH</span>]]''' [[User Talk:Black Harry|(T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Black Harry|C)]] 05:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
271939 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271938 +++$+++ 271938 +++$+++ 2007-06-08 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.181334780E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but judging from the comments I see, I'm usually not nearly an active enough editor.  I'm also trying to scale down how much time I spend on wiki.-- +++$+++ :Thanks, but judging from the comments I see, I'm usually not nearly an active enough editor.  I'm also trying to scale down how much time I spend on wiki.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 13:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
271940 +++$+++ Black Harry +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271938 +++$+++ 271939 +++$+++ 2007-06-08 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.181340540E09 +++$+++ Okay, no problem.  ''' +++$+++ ::Okay, no problem.  '''[[User:Black Harry|<span style="color:black">BH</span>]]''' [[User Talk:Black Harry|(T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Black Harry|C)]] 15:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

9795 +++$+++ Schwyz +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-09 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.281390900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Schwyz|Schwyz]] ([[User talk:Schwyz|talk]]) 14:55, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
9796 +++$+++ Ezhiki +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9795 +++$+++ 9795 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Schwyz, please assume good faith.  Petri, your comment would be much appreciated [[Talk:Guberniya#WP:RM|here]].  Thanks!\u2014 +++$+++ :Schwyz, please assume good faith.  Petri, your comment would be much appreciated [[Talk:Guberniya#WP:RM|here]].  Thanks!—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); August&nbsp;9, 2010; 15:40 (UTC)

9797 +++$+++ KoshVorlon +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-13 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.281731400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:KoshVorlon|<span style="font:95% Trebuchet MS;color:darkred">'''KoshVorlon'''</span>]]<span style="font-size:90%;position:relative;top:-0.4em;">''[[User talk:KoshVorlon|'''Naluboutes''',Aeria Gloris]]''</span> 13:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
9798 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9797 +++$+++ 9797 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.283405460E09 +++$+++ Should I turn \"Safe search\" on or off in [[Google image search]], if I want to know what that German word means in English? --  +++$+++ :Should I turn "Safe search" on or off in [[Google image search]], if I want to know what that German word means in English? -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 22:31, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

9800 +++$+++  +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9800 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-17 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.282077960E09 +++$+++ I've just reverted  +++$+++ I've just reverted [[User:Radeksz]]'s edit at [[Prince-Bishop]] and suggested we discuss the issue to try to find [[WP:consensus|consensus]] at [[Talk:Prince-Bishop#Nationalist / anti-nationalist place naming]], where I assume you will way to express your opinion. Let's see if we can solve this dispute amicably. — [[:en:User:OwenBlacker|OwenBlacker]] ([[:en:User talk:OwenBlacker|Talk]]) 13:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
9801 +++$+++  +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9800 +++$+++ 9800 +++$+++ 2010-08-18 06:23:00 +++$+++ 1.282137780E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Sander_S%C3%A4de|<span style="font-family:Courier; color:#555">Sander&nbsp;Säde</span>]] 06:23, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
9802 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9800 +++$+++ 9800 +++$+++ 2010-08-18 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.282142400E09 +++$+++ I will look for more specific sources on the breakup of the numbers. At this moment I am still looking for the 20,000 missing Jews who were imported to Estonian camps and somehow mysteriously survived the Holocaust. --  +++$+++ :I will look for more specific sources on the breakup of the numbers. At this moment I am still looking for the 20,000 missing Jews who were imported to Estonian camps and somehow mysteriously survived the Holocaust. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 07:40, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

9803 +++$+++ Student7 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-23 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.282629300E09 +++$+++ Incidentally, I like the way you have structured you contributions. Very nice!  +++$+++ Incidentally, I like the way you have structured you contributions. Very nice! [[User:Student7|Student7]] ([[User talk:Student7|talk]]) 22:55, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
9804 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9803 +++$+++ 9803 +++$+++ 2010-08-23 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.282630380E09 +++$+++ There should not be any \"honours\" parameter in [[Template:Other ships]]. There is one in [[Template:Infobox ship career]]. Maybe you have just mixed up the templates? --  +++$+++ :There should not be any "honours" parameter in [[Template:Other ships]]. There is one in [[Template:Infobox ship career]]. Maybe you have just mixed up the templates? -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 23:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
9805 +++$+++ Student7 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9803 +++$+++ 9804 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.282759440E09 +++$+++ It was just a \"pass through\" parameter which I just changed successfully. I didn't realize they worked like that. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::It was just a "pass through" parameter which I just changed successfully. I didn't realize they worked like that. Thanks. [[User:Student7|Student7]] ([[User talk:Student7|talk]]) 11:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

271949 +++$+++ User A1 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-21 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.182426960E09 +++$+++ where it is the differential\/considered fluid element. But to say that in an intro will confuse readers? What do you think about this?  +++$+++ where it is the differential/considered fluid element. But to say that in an intro will confuse readers? What do you think about this? [[User:User A1|User A1]] 04:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
271950 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271949 +++$+++ 271949 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.182426960E09 +++$+++ Either side of WHAT?-- +++$+++ :Either side of WHAT?--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 04:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
271951 +++$+++ User A1 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271949 +++$+++ 271949 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.182446940E09 +++$+++ As per my previous comment '''\"where ''it'' is the differential or considered fluid element\"''''. Perhaps we need a diagram here to clear this up.  +++$+++ : As per my previous comment '''"where ''it'' is the differential or considered fluid element"''''. Perhaps we need a diagram here to clear this up. [[User:User A1|User A1]] 10:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

9807 +++$+++ Communicat +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-27 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.282947840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Communicat|Communicat]] ([[User talk:Communicat|talk]]) 15:24, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
9808 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9807 +++$+++ 9807 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.282948740E09 +++$+++ <s>Shit<\/s> [[WP:EEML|EEML]] happened! --  +++$+++ :<s>Shit</s> [[WP:EEML|EEML]] happened! -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 15:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
9809 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9807 +++$+++ 9807 +++$+++ 2010-08-30 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.283164080E09 +++$+++ ''P.S.'' \u2013 We do not even have [[United States military presence in Europe]], yet we have [[Soviet occupations]] and about <s>a hundred<\/s> [[:Category:Soviet occupations|114]] subpages. --  +++$+++ :''P.S.'' – We do not even have [[United States military presence in Europe]], yet we have [[Soviet occupations]] and about <s>a hundred</s> [[:Category:Soviet occupations|114]] subpages. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 03:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

271953 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271953 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-28 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.183023360E09 +++$+++ Hi.  You opposed FA status for this article citing problems with publishing dates of web sources being incorrect.  I would gladly fix these, but I don't know to which you refer.  Thanks.-- +++$+++ Hi.  You opposed FA status for this article citing problems with publishing dates of web sources being incorrect.  I would gladly fix these, but I don't know to which you refer.  Thanks.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 02:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
271954 +++$+++ Epbr123 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271953 +++$+++ 271953 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.183047000E09 +++$+++ I don't have time to look through all the references at the moment, but if you do it yourself you'll see which dates are incorrect.  +++$+++ *I don't have time to look through all the references at the moment, but if you do it yourself you'll see which dates are incorrect. [[User:Epbr123|Epbr123]] 09:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

9810 +++$+++ Biophys +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9810 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-30 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.283168580E09 +++$+++ I am sorry, but ''[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Biophys&diff=381802437&oldid=381755057 that]'' indeed was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=381794160 circus] or worse. I am sorry, but calling other people \"clowns\" is not really helpful, especially after [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Biophys&diff=prev&oldid=381501188 such my edit summary]. I hoped you would respect my wish. No further circus, please. +++$+++ I am sorry, but ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Biophys&diff=381802437&oldid=381755057 that]'' indeed was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=381794160 circus] or worse. I am sorry, but calling other people "clowns" is not really helpful, especially after [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Biophys&diff=prev&oldid=381501188 such my edit summary]. I hoped you would respect my wish. No further circus, please.[[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys|talk]]) 04:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
9811 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9810 +++$+++ 9810 +++$+++ 2010-08-30 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.283169120E09 +++$+++ I ''have'' respected your wish, as you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Biophys&diff=next&oldid=381802437 see here]. Now go do something useful and fun or I ''will'' ask some administrator to reopen the case. --  +++$+++ :I ''have'' respected your wish, as you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Biophys&diff=next&oldid=381802437 see here]. Now go do something useful and fun or I ''will'' ask some administrator to reopen the case. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 04:52, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
9812 +++$+++ Biophys +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9810 +++$+++ 9811 +++$+++ 2010-08-30 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.283207520E09 +++$+++ What this suppose to mean? The AE request was about Russavia and not about me. You closed it to support Russavia, and no, you did not respect my wish, as follows from your own diff. I do not need any favors from you except leaving me alone [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Biophys&diff=prev&oldid=381501188]. The revert by Russavia was one something I do not care that much. But retaliation campaign against me by Russavia, Offliner, Igny and you has to stop. Do you agree? ''Will you leave me alone? \"Yes\" would be enough.''  +++$+++ ::What this suppose to mean? The AE request was about Russavia and not about me. You closed it to support Russavia, and no, you did not respect my wish, as follows from your own diff. I do not need any favors from you except leaving me alone [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Biophys&diff=prev&oldid=381501188]. The revert by Russavia was one something I do not care that much. But retaliation campaign against me by Russavia, Offliner, Igny and you has to stop. Do you agree? ''Will you leave me alone? "Yes" would be enough.'' [[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys|talk]]) 15:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
9813 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9810 +++$+++ 9812 +++$+++ 2010-08-30 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.283208360E09 +++$+++ And yes, I ''have'' left you alone. --  +++$+++ :::And yes, I ''have'' left you alone. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 15:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
9814 +++$+++ Biophys +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9810 +++$+++ 9813 +++$+++ 2010-08-30 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.283212440E09 +++$+++ So the answer is \"yes\". Thank you. This is all I wanted to hear. As about closing this AE request, I have no judgment except this should be done by uninvolved administrators. P.S. I am not a professional clown, as you are probably aware. And it was never my intention to appear as clown here. I take it seriously.  +++$+++ ::::So the answer is "yes". Thank you. This is all I wanted to hear. As about closing this AE request, I have no judgment except this should be done by uninvolved administrators. P.S. I am not a professional clown, as you are probably aware. And it was never my intention to appear as clown here. I take it seriously. [[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys|talk]]) 16:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

534100 +++$+++ Hobapotter +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-01 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.265057460E09 +++$+++ Hi, I have taken a few screenshots from a football match. These screenshots show the players and I intend to use them under fair use in each player's appropriate article. Can I upload them or will they be deleted?  +++$+++ Hi, I have taken a few screenshots from a football match. These screenshots show the players and I intend to use them under fair use in each player's appropriate article. Can I upload them or will they be deleted? [[User:Hobapotter|Hobapotter]] ([[User talk:Hobapotter|talk]]) 12:51, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
534101 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534100 +++$+++ 534100 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.265059620E09 +++$+++ Sorry to butt in. If the images are copyright, they must comply with Wikipedia's [[WP:NFCC|Non-free content criteria]]. Unfortunately, if the players are ''living'', the images will almost certainly fail these criteria because non-free images must not be replaceable and Wikipedia considers almost any non-free image of a living person to be replaceable. It's not ideal but it's policy. Hope that helps. Best,  +++$+++ :Sorry to butt in. If the images are copyright, they must comply with Wikipedia's [[WP:NFCC|Non-free content criteria]]. Unfortunately, if the players are ''living'', the images will almost certainly fail these criteria because non-free images must not be replaceable and Wikipedia considers almost any non-free image of a living person to be replaceable. It's not ideal but it's policy. Hope that helps. Best, [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ Mitchell'''</font>]] | [[User_Talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">fancy a chat? </font>]]  13:27, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
534102 +++$+++ Hobapotter +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534100 +++$+++ 534101 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.265060400E09 +++$+++ Hi, Thanks for the information but there's no claim on the copyright; I mean to ask Is there any copyright on a still image from a video?  +++$+++ ::Hi, Thanks for the information but there's no claim on the copyright; I mean to ask Is there any copyright on a still image from a video? [[User:Hobapotter|Hobapotter]] ([[User talk:Hobapotter|talk]]) 13:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
534103 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534100 +++$+++ 534102 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.265061360E09 +++$+++ Almost certainly- the content of the video probably belongs to the production company,  but if you can prove that it is in the [[public domain]] or licensed under the an appropriate [[Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License |Creative Commons]] license, you should be OK. The problem is that the burden of proof, so to speak, rests with you. Is the image one you found online? If so, you could give me the URL and I'll have a look for any evidence of copyright or otherwise.  +++$+++ :::Almost certainly- the content of the video probably belongs to the production company,  but if you can prove that it is in the [[public domain]] or licensed under the an appropriate [[Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License |Creative Commons]] license, you should be OK. The problem is that the burden of proof, so to speak, rests with you. Is the image one you found online? If so, you could give me the URL and I'll have a look for any evidence of copyright or otherwise. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ Mitchell'''</font>]] | [[User_Talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">fancy a chat? </font>]]  13:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

271957 +++$+++ SusanLesch +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271957 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-28 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.183097940E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | To Loodog, on the occasion of [[Providence, Rhode Island]] and [[Minneapolis, Minnesota]] reaching featured article. With thanks - +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | To Loodog, on the occasion of [[Providence, Rhode Island]] and [[Minneapolis, Minnesota]] reaching featured article. With thanks -[[User:Susanlesch|Susanlesch]] 23:19, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
271958 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271957 +++$+++ 271957 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.183346940E09 +++$+++ I apologize in failing to assume good faith; however, I failed to noticed your changing from 3480 originally, to 3703, to 1344, and later 1428 were in different units, and so, without edit summaries, I assumed them to be vandalism.  You are correct and I have since changed the Houston densities back to your figures, with slight corrections.-- +++$+++ :I apologize in failing to assume good faith; however, I failed to noticed your changing from 3480 originally, to 3703, to 1344, and later 1428 were in different units, and so, without edit summaries, I assumed them to be vandalism.  You are correct and I have since changed the Houston densities back to your figures, with slight corrections.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 20:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

271960 +++$+++ Black Harry +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-03 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.183503720E09 +++$+++ Just read in the signpost that [[Providence]] reached featured status.  Good Job.  I think you should request that it be the main page's featured article.  To do so go to [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article\/requests]].  [[Boston]] was recently on the main page, and [[Samuel Adams]] will be there tomorrow (July 4, yes its intentional).  If you do request I'd chime in if you wanted.  '''[[User:Black Harry|<span style=\"color:black\">Black Harry<\/span>]]'''  +++$+++ Just read in the signpost that [[Providence]] reached featured status.  Good Job.  I think you should request that it be the main page's featured article.  To do so go to [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests]].  [[Boston]] was recently on the main page, and [[Samuel Adams]] will be there tomorrow (July 4, yes its intentional).  If you do request I'd chime in if you wanted.  '''[[User:Black Harry|<span style="color:black">Black Harry</span>]]''' [[User:Black Harry/Highlights|(Highlights]]|[[Special:Contributions/Black Harry|Contribs)]] 16:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
271961 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271960 +++$+++ 271960 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.183505940E09 +++$+++ Well, I felt kind of demanding when I listed it for FA twice.  I figured I'd give it a bit of time before trying for front page.  Also, far as I can tell, they like to vary the front page articles and [[Boston]]'s front page moment was two weeks ago.-- +++$+++ :Well, I felt kind of demanding when I listed it for FA twice.  I figured I'd give it a bit of time before trying for front page.  Also, far as I can tell, they like to vary the front page articles and [[Boston]]'s front page moment was two weeks ago.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 16:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
271962 +++$+++ Black Harry +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271960 +++$+++ 271961 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.183520220E09 +++$+++ Okay, I was wondering what you would think about having providence there.  ''' +++$+++ ::Okay, I was wondering what you would think about having providence there.  '''[[User:Black Harry|<span style="color:Red">Black Harry</span>]] • <span style="color:Blue">Happy Independence Day</span>''' 20:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
271963 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271960 +++$+++ 271962 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.183521720E09 +++$+++ Oh, I'd love to see it.  I'm just waiting for a more feasible time.-- +++$+++ :::Oh, I'd love to see it.  I'm just waiting for a more feasible time.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 21:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

9817 +++$+++ Edward321 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9817 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-04 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.283636160E09 +++$+++ Petri, thank you for providing sources and improving the article. Unfortunately your statements on the talk page came across as personal attacks to me. I suggest you carefully read the links I provided. The alleged source, \"Fascism Today: A world survey\" clearly does not even mention Hendrik van den Bergh, so it cannot source that he was head of this organization. Likewise, my link shows that \"Fascism Today: A world survey\" says that Broederbond was created before   the Ossewa Brandwag and that the latter organization evolved into the National Party, not the Broederbond. When Comminicat is trying to use \"Fascism Today: A world survey\" to support things that are not mentioned or are flatly contradicted in \"Fascism Today: A world survey\" that is not a content dispute, especially when other users have documented Communicat doing the same thing with other sources in other articles.  +++$+++ Petri, thank you for providing sources and improving the article. Unfortunately your statements on the talk page came across as personal attacks to me. I suggest you carefully read the links I provided. The alleged source, "Fascism Today: A world survey" clearly does not even mention Hendrik van den Bergh, so it cannot source that he was head of this organization. Likewise, my link shows that "Fascism Today: A world survey" says that Broederbond was created before   the Ossewa Brandwag and that the latter organization evolved into the National Party, not the Broederbond. When Comminicat is trying to use "Fascism Today: A world survey" to support things that are not mentioned or are flatly contradicted in "Fascism Today: A world survey" that is not a content dispute, especially when other users have documented Communicat doing the same thing with other sources in other articles. [[User:Edward321|Edward321]] ([[User talk:Edward321|talk]]) 14:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
9818 +++$+++ Edward321 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9817 +++$+++ 9817 +++$+++ 2010-09-04 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.283637480E09 +++$+++ To clarify - I have no doubt that Bergh was part of these organizations - other sources clearly show that. The problem is that \"Fascism Today: A world survey\" does not mention him at all.  +++$+++ :To clarify - I have no doubt that Bergh was part of these organizations - other sources clearly show that. The problem is that "Fascism Today: A world survey" does not mention him at all. [[User:Edward321|Edward321]] ([[User talk:Edward321|talk]]) 14:58, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
9819 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9817 +++$+++ 9818 +++$+++ 2010-09-04 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.283638380E09 +++$+++ As for the talk page, I suppose you are referring to [[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert\/Archives\/2010\/September#Communicat 2]]. --  +++$+++ ::As for the talk page, I suppose you are referring to [[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert/Archives/2010/September#Communicat 2]]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 15:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

534106 +++$+++ Tedder +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534106 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-05 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.265384580E09 +++$+++ Hey, you closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Digital Insight|this AFD]], but you didn't manually close the two \"children\" nominations. I took care of it, this is just a friendly reminder\/nudge for the future. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hey, you closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Insight|this AFD]], but you didn't manually close the two "children" nominations. I took care of it, this is just a friendly reminder/nudge for the future. Cheers, [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 07:43, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
534107 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534106 +++$+++ 534106 +++$+++ 2010-02-14 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.266198180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that :-) --''' +++$+++ : Thanks for that :-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

569615 +++$+++ Prelate Zeratul +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569615 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.168839720E09 +++$+++ Hi, could you delete said article and move [[:Hunter killer (starcraft unit)]] there to take its place? That would be much appreciated. Thanks! ''' +++$+++ Hi, could you delete said article and move [[:Hunter killer (starcraft unit)]] there to take its place? That would be much appreciated. Thanks! '''[[User:Prelate Zeratul|<font color="ForestGreen">Zeratul</font>]] <sup>[[User Talk:Prelate Zeratul|<font color="DarkRed">En Taro Adun!</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Prelate Zeratul|<font color="LightSteelBlue">So be it.</font>]]</sub>''' 21:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
569616 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569615 +++$+++ 569615 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.168841640E09 +++$+++ Done, with page histories merged.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Done, with page histories merged.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

9821 +++$+++ Guettarda +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9821 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-07 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.283890680E09 +++$+++ I removed your tag, since the article had already been moved, without redirect, back to MN's userspace. The redirect Rd232 replaced it with seems appropriate.  +++$+++ I removed your tag, since the article had already been moved, without redirect, back to MN's userspace. The redirect Rd232 replaced it with seems appropriate. [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 13:18, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
9822 +++$+++ Guettarda +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9821 +++$+++ 9821 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.283891580E09 +++$+++ I see what you mean. I thought your tagging was the result of a server lag. Sorry about that.  +++$+++ :I see what you mean. I thought your tagging was the result of a server lag. Sorry about that. [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 13:33, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
9823 +++$+++ Rd232 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9821 +++$+++ 9821 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.283893080E09 +++$+++ seems a reasonable redirect. why not leave it?  +++$+++ :seems a reasonable redirect. why not leave it? [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 13:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
9824 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9821 +++$+++ 9823 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.283893260E09 +++$+++ Why? Because it makes an undiscussed change to the ''status quo'' against existing consensus. --  +++$+++ ::Why? Because it makes an undiscussed change to the ''status quo'' against existing consensus. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 14:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
9825 +++$+++ Guettarda +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9821 +++$+++ 9824 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.283893620E09 +++$+++ When the article was deleted, there was no [[climate change alarmism]] article. It exists now, and (IMO...I'm a major contributor, so I may be biased) the new article covers the material in an appropriate and NPOV manner. The status quo was changed when the cc alarmism article was created (and survived an AFD). The redirect has the added advantage that it informs anyone trying to create a cc exaggeration article that the topic is already covered and maybe, just maybe, might make them reconsider creating the article.  +++$+++ :::When the article was deleted, there was no [[climate change alarmism]] article. It exists now, and (IMO...I'm a major contributor, so I may be biased) the new article covers the material in an appropriate and NPOV manner. The status quo was changed when the cc alarmism article was created (and survived an AFD). The redirect has the added advantage that it informs anyone trying to create a cc exaggeration article that the topic is already covered and maybe, just maybe, might make them reconsider creating the article. [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 14:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
9826 +++$+++ Rd232 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9821 +++$+++ 9825 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.283893920E09 +++$+++ Makes sense to me.  +++$+++ ::::Makes sense to me. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 14:12, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
9827 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9821 +++$+++ 9826 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.283894160E09 +++$+++ OK, understood! I do however suggest that you [[WP:SALT]] the redirect to prevent recreation of deleted content. If you think that the two of you are too involved use your admin channels and have someone else do it. --  +++$+++ :::::OK, understood! I do however suggest that you [[WP:SALT]] the redirect to prevent recreation of deleted content. If you think that the two of you are too involved use your admin channels and have someone else do it. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 14:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
9828 +++$+++ Guettarda +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9821 +++$+++ 9827 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.283894700E09 +++$+++ I'm too active in the area to do that. Better to ask someone less involved.  +++$+++ ::::::I'm too active in the area to do that. Better to ask someone less involved. [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 14:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

534111 +++$+++ Aichikawa +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534111 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-25 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.267141320E09 +++$+++ Yes I'm willing to help. Please put it up and I will work on it. -- +++$+++ Yes I'm willing to help. Please put it up and I will work on it. --[[User:Aichikawa|Aichikawa]] ([[User talk:Aichikawa|talk]]) 15:42, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
534112 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534111 +++$+++ 534111 +++$+++ 2010-02-25 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.267144080E09 +++$+++ Done. Good luck :-) --''' +++$+++ : Done. Good luck :-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:28, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
534113 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534111 +++$+++ 534111 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.268606700E09 +++$+++ Hi. Indeed, the original article was deleted because of problems with sources. The new version looks well-supported by recent references so this in my opinion counters the original deletion rationale. I think you can move the article to the article space, tell me if you need any help with that. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Indeed, the original article was deleted because of problems with sources. The new version looks well-supported by recent references so this in my opinion counters the original deletion rationale. I think you can move the article to the article space, tell me if you need any help with that. Regards, --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
534114 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534111 +++$+++ 534111 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.268606700E09 +++$+++ Hi. I can't find the article you mention, are you sure it was me who deleted it? Best, --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I can't find the article you mention, are you sure it was me who deleted it? Best, --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

271969 +++$+++ Drew30319 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-10 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.184110020E09 +++$+++ I don't know if you are likely to read the talk page on the article and so am leaving this comment here instead. Please let me know your thoughts either here or on my talk page. Thanks!  +++$+++ I don't know if you are likely to read the talk page on the article and so am leaving this comment here instead. Please let me know your thoughts either here or on my talk page. Thanks! [[User:Drew30319|Drew30319]] 16:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
271970 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271969 +++$+++ 271969 +++$+++ 2007-07-10 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.184112660E09 +++$+++ The reference you found for the housing market doesn't say Atlanta's top housing status is in single-family homes.  It says: Atlanta, which has #n single family housing permits, led the nation in housing activity.-- +++$+++ :The reference you found for the housing market doesn't say Atlanta's top housing status is in single-family homes.  It says: Atlanta, which has #n single family housing permits, led the nation in housing activity.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 17:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
271971 +++$+++ Drew30319 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271969 +++$+++ 271970 +++$+++ 2007-07-10 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.184116380E09 +++$+++ With respect to growth relative to the top-50 I'm agnostic and if there is no perceived value then it's fine with me to stay with the single statistic. I merely added it because I noted the number while searching for the reference and thought it might be valuable to some.  +++$+++ :* With respect to growth relative to the top-50 I'm agnostic and if there is no perceived value then it's fine with me to stay with the single statistic. I merely added it because I noted the number while searching for the reference and thought it might be valuable to some. [[User:Drew30319|Drew30319]] 18:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

534115 +++$+++ ShadowViolet +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534115 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-17 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.268817540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:ShadowViolet|ShadowViolet]] ([[User talk:ShadowViolet|talk]]) 02:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
534116 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534115 +++$+++ 534115 +++$+++ 2010-03-17 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.268842920E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted three times by different admins. In its last shape, it was in quite a poor state and did not meet the criteria. However, if new material is available, you are invited to start the article from scratch and write it again. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted three times by different admins. In its last shape, it was in quite a poor state and did not meet the criteria. However, if new material is available, you are invited to start the article from scratch and write it again. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

9829 +++$+++ Marknutley +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9829 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.283893320E09 +++$+++ This article is under a 1r restriction, you have broken it, please self revert  +++$+++ This article is under a 1r restriction, you have broken it, please self revert [[User:Marknutley|mark nutley]] ([[User talk:Marknutley|talk]]) 14:02, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
9830 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9829 +++$+++ 9829 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.283893740E09 +++$+++ No, I have not. My [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes&diff=383440157&oldid=383435049 first edit] introduced a new lede and deleted \/ reverted some content. My [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes&diff=383454047&oldid=383451341 second edit] restored the new lede (revet #1) and integrated changes made after my first edit to section ''Origin of debate'' by User {{User|Paul Siebert}}. --  +++$+++ :No, I have not. My [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes&diff=383440157&oldid=383435049 first edit] introduced a new lede and deleted / reverted some content. My [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes&diff=383454047&oldid=383451341 second edit] restored the new lede (revet #1) and integrated changes made after my first edit to section ''Origin of debate'' by User {{User|Paul Siebert}}. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 14:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
9831 +++$+++ Marknutley +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9829 +++$+++ 9830 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.283895480E09 +++$+++ Yes you have, first revert [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes&action=historysubmit&diff=383440157&oldid=383435049] Second revert [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes&action=historysubmit&diff=383454047&oldid=383451341] Please self revert and get consensus before such changes in the future, thanks  +++$+++ ::Yes you have, first revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes&action=historysubmit&diff=383440157&oldid=383435049] Second revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes&action=historysubmit&diff=383454047&oldid=383451341] Please self revert and get consensus before such changes in the future, thanks [[User:Marknutley|mark nutley]] ([[User talk:Marknutley|talk]]) 14:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
9832 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9829 +++$+++ 9831 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.283895900E09 +++$+++ If you really think so, then you should report me to the appropriate forum, wherever that is. --  +++$+++ :::If you really think so, then you should report me to the appropriate forum, wherever that is. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 14:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
9833 +++$+++ Marknutley +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9829 +++$+++ 9832 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.283896620E09 +++$+++ Ok see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Edit_warring#User:Petri_Krohn_reported_by_User:Marknutley_.28Result:_.29 Here]  +++$+++ ::::Ok see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Petri_Krohn_reported_by_User:Marknutley_.28Result:_.29 Here] [[User:Marknutley|mark nutley]] ([[User talk:Marknutley|talk]]) 14:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

45329 +++$+++ Patthedog +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45329 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-07 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.278522840E09 +++$+++ Doc, what\u2019s up - why are you removing this? We\u2019ve been through all this before (somewhere in the archives) and pop \/ rock was settled upon. What\u2019s wrong with pop as a category? It\u2019s a perfectly accurate description of The Beatles\u2019 music circa 1963. -- +++$+++ Doc, what’s up - why are you removing this? We’ve been through all this before (somewhere in the archives) and pop / rock was settled upon. What’s wrong with pop as a category? It’s a perfectly accurate description of The Beatles’ music circa 1963. --[[User:Patthedog|Patthedog]] ([[User talk:Patthedog|talk]]) 10:14, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
45330 +++$+++ PL290 +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45329 +++$+++ 45329 +++$+++ 2010-07-08 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.278611940E09 +++$+++ Well, it was discussed, as you say, but surely \"rock band\" then stuck for a good while as the preferred modern-day parlance? That's why I too took out \"pop and rock band\" the other day&mdash;I was surprised to see it while considering those other proposed changes to the opening sentence. Sure, they played pop and rock, but if you ask me, rock band describes them perfectly. Rock bands play pop too.  +++$+++ :Well, it was discussed, as you say, but surely "rock band" then stuck for a good while as the preferred modern-day parlance? That's why I too took out "pop and rock band" the other day&mdash;I was surprised to see it while considering those other proposed changes to the opening sentence. Sure, they played pop and rock, but if you ask me, rock band describes them perfectly. Rock bands play pop too. [[User:PL290|PL290]] ([[User talk:PL290|talk]]) 10:59, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
45331 +++$+++ Patthedog +++$+++ DocKino +++$+++ 45329 +++$+++ 45330 +++$+++ 2010-07-08 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.278636360E09 +++$+++ It might seem only little thing (funnily, I was saying that to Mrs. Patthedog the other day) but it\u2019s important to me. However, I\u2019m sure that I\u2019ll get over it in time. That\u2019s the way democracy crumbles. Cheers. -- +++$+++ ::It might seem only little thing (funnily, I was saying that to Mrs. Patthedog the other day) but it’s important to me. However, I’m sure that I’ll get over it in time. That’s the way democracy crumbles. Cheers. --[[User:Patthedog|Patthedog]] ([[User talk:Patthedog|talk]]) 17:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

534120 +++$+++ Cargoking +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534120 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-21 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.269207420E09 +++$+++ I see you are online. There's a drought of ITN admins. There are a few items waiting in the wings to be posted. Would you mind doing the honours (I would if I could, but you know....). \u2014<small>&nbsp;<span style=\"border:2px solid #000;padding:1px;\">&nbsp; +++$+++ I see you are online. There's a drought of ITN admins. There are a few items waiting in the wings to be posted. Would you mind doing the honours (I would if I could, but you know....). —<small>&nbsp;<span style="border:2px solid #000;padding:1px;">&nbsp;[[User:Cargoking|<font style="color:#000080;">'''Cargoking'''</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Cargoking|<font style="color:#f9f9f9;background:#000000;">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 14:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
534121 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534120 +++$+++ 534120 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.269383580E09 +++$+++ Hey, is this a good candidate for the \"salting the earth\" option that prevents article re-creation? Tks. &bull;&nbsp; +++$+++ * Hey, is this a good candidate for the "salting the earth" option that prevents article re-creation? Tks. &bull;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 15:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
534122 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534120 +++$+++ 534120 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.269383940E09 +++$+++ I don't think this is necessary at the moment, the previous time this was deleted was in 2005. However, if the article is recreated again, salting is indeed an option. --''' +++$+++ : I don't think this is necessary at the moment, the previous time this was deleted was in 2005. However, if the article is recreated again, salting is indeed an option. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:39, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
534123 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534120 +++$+++ 534120 +++$+++ 2010-03-24 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.269443880E09 +++$+++ Hi. What do you mean by the other of the cited article? I can undelete but just saying that the copying took place the other way around is not a very strong argument... Please help me with this one. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. What do you mean by the other of the cited article? I can undelete but just saying that the copying took place the other way around is not a very strong argument... Please help me with this one. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
534124 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534120 +++$+++ 534123 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 08:40:00 +++$+++ 1.269531600E09 +++$+++ Well, it's all question of proving what was first. Anyway, let's not complicate, I'll restore it. But I invite you to work on the article, it's not really in a perfect shape. --''' +++$+++ :: Well, it's all question of proving what was first. Anyway, let's not complicate, I'll restore it. But I invite you to work on the article, it's not really in a perfect shape. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
534125 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534120 +++$+++ 534124 +++$+++ 2010-03-26 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.269634560E09 +++$+++ Tone, please do not restore this page. It was deleted per a deletion discussion, see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Open Platform as a Service]]. It is basically a form of [[WP:VANISPAM]]. See also [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations\/ComputerComet52]]. Thanks, -- ''' +++$+++ :::Tone, please do not restore this page. It was deleted per a deletion discussion, see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Platform as a Service]]. It is basically a form of [[WP:VANISPAM]]. See also [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ComputerComet52]]. Thanks, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 13:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
534126 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534120 +++$+++ 534125 +++$+++ 2010-03-26 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.269634680E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see it was deleted again, by another admin as [[Wikipedia:CSD#G4|CSD G4]]. No worries, -- ''' +++$+++ ::::Ah, I see it was deleted again, by another admin as [[Wikipedia:CSD#G4|CSD G4]]. No worries, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 13:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

271977 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-20 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.184969580E09 +++$+++ package. Cheers,  +++$+++ package. Cheers, [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 15:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
271978 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271977 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-20 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.184972880E09 +++$+++ Your new images look nice, but I worry leaving out the axes neglects an important point about the spatial dependence.-- +++$+++ ::Your new images look nice, but I worry leaving out the axes neglects an important point about the spatial dependence.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 16:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
271979 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271977 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.185012240E09 +++$+++ I added the axes. The new image is [[:Image:Uniform curl.svg]]. I'd argue that the lines look much sharper, and there are no JPG artifacts. If you could give me the EPS version of the other images I could do the same for them (I can't run the 3D code on my Mathematica installation).  +++$+++ ::: I added the axes. The new image is [[:Image:Uniform curl.svg]]. I'd argue that the lines look much sharper, and there are no JPG artifacts. If you could give me the EPS version of the other images I could do the same for them (I can't run the 3D code on my Mathematica installation). [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 03:04, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

9837 +++$+++ Wgfinley +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-07 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.283911740E09 +++$+++ I don't see that you were ever formally warned about general sanctions editing these articles, consider this your warning.  Having previously served some long blocks I would encourage you to use a great amount of care editing these articles.  Also you have a comment on the AE filing you didn't sign.  -- +++$+++ I don't see that you were ever formally warned about general sanctions editing these articles, consider this your warning.  Having previously served some long blocks I would encourage you to use a great amount of care editing these articles.  Also you have a comment on the AE filing you didn't sign.  --[[User:Wgfinley|WGFinley]] ([[User talk:Wgfinley|talk]]) 19:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
9838 +++$+++ Communicat +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9837 +++$+++ 9837 +++$+++ 2010-09-11 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.284259920E09 +++$+++ Thnaks for helping with jpeg licensing suggestion. I might or might not get around to sorting it out at some point if or when Winer becomes available again for consultation. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thnaks for helping with jpeg licensing suggestion. I might or might not get around to sorting it out at some point if or when Winer becomes available again for consultation. Regards, [[User:Communicat|Communicat]] ([[User talk:Communicat|talk]]) 19:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
9839 +++$+++  +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9837 +++$+++ 9838 +++$+++ 2010-09-11 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.284262020E09 +++$+++ Re your: Wikipedia does not exactly open the pictures for commercial \"exploitation\"; the GFDL and other copyleft licenses are \"commie poison\" that prevent any future exploitation. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 20:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ ::Re your: Wikipedia does not exactly open the pictures for commercial "exploitation"; the GFDL and other copyleft licenses are "commie poison" that prevent any future exploitation. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 20:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
9840 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9837 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.284348240E09 +++$+++ You should familiarize yourself with the concepts of [[free content]] and [[copyleft]]. After this revolution initiated by [[Richard Stallman]] \"free\" has replaced \"non-commercial\" as the right thing to do. --  +++$+++ ::::You should familiarize yourself with the concepts of [[free content]] and [[copyleft]]. After this revolution initiated by [[Richard Stallman]] "free" has replaced "non-commercial" as the right thing to do. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 20:24, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

271982 +++$+++  +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-17 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.187405820E09 +++$+++ I am not sure if you live in [[Chicagoland]], but I see you have edited [[Chicago]] quite a bit. If you are not from Chicago I apologize for the following message. A  [[Wikipedia:Meetup\/Chicago 2|Chicago Meetup]] has been scheduled.  I hope the time and place are convenient. Your reply would be appreciated.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ I am not sure if you live in [[Chicagoland]], but I see you have edited [[Chicago]] quite a bit. If you are not from Chicago I apologize for the following message. A  [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 2|Chicago Meetup]] has been scheduled.  I hope the time and place are convenient. Your reply would be appreciated.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 19:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
271983 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271982 +++$+++ 271982 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.187407260E09 +++$+++ Nope, I live on the East Coast.-- +++$+++ :Nope, I live on the East Coast.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 20:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
271984 +++$+++ Pzavon +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271982 +++$+++ 271982 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.187686080E09 +++$+++ '''Strong Oppose'''  \"City, State\" is a standard US convention for identifying any city and seems well established in Wikipedia.  The more exceptions, the harder it is to deal with the process and the ore cross-checking is needed.  Furthermore, while the cities proposed for this move are often known by city name alone, not all of them are unique city names.  Determining that the non-unique name in one state is so impressivley prominent as to trump any other use of the name in another state seems to me to rather subjective and not appropriate for the Wikipedia.  +++$+++ *'''Strong Oppose'''  "City, State" is a standard US convention for identifying any city and seems well established in Wikipedia.  The more exceptions, the harder it is to deal with the process and the ore cross-checking is needed.  Furthermore, while the cities proposed for this move are often known by city name alone, not all of them are unique city names.  Determining that the non-unique name in one state is so impressivley prominent as to trump any other use of the name in another state seems to me to rather subjective and not appropriate for the Wikipedia. [[User:Pzavon|Pzavon]] 01:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
271985 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271982 +++$+++ 271984 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.187686320E09 +++$+++ '''Comment''' And yet we've already done it for all these places by having the base page redirect to them.-- +++$+++ **'''Comment''' And yet we've already done it for all these places by having the base page redirect to them.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 01:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
271986 +++$+++ Serge Issakov +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271982 +++$+++ 271985 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.187686740E09 +++$+++ Good point, but reason does not seem to affect them.  -- +++$+++ *** Good point, but reason does not seem to affect them.  --[[User:Serge Issakov|Serge]] 01:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

534127 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-27 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.269707880E09 +++$+++ Would you mind restoring [[No Cussing Club]] to my userspace?  It's clearly notable at this point so I have half a mind to resurrect it with appropriate sources.  Thanks,  -  +++$+++ Would you mind restoring [[No Cussing Club]] to my userspace?  It's clearly notable at this point so I have half a mind to resurrect it with appropriate sources.  Thanks,  - [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 09:38, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
534128 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534127 +++$+++ 534127 +++$+++ 2010-03-27 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.269739920E09 +++$+++ Sure. Would you like to have the whole history or just the last version? (so that I know whether I need to restore and move and so on or can I just copy-paste). --''' +++$+++ : Sure. Would you like to have the whole history or just the last version? (so that I know whether I need to restore and move and so on or can I just copy-paste). --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

541528 +++$+++ Zaku Two +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-21 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.177140960E09 +++$+++ Until Namco and\/or Sony officially announce that Ace combat 6 will be on both consoles, the page will only say it's on the 360. One magazine's word isn't good enough.   +++$+++ Until Namco and/or Sony officially announce that Ace combat 6 will be on both consoles, the page will only say it's on the 360. One magazine's word isn't good enough.  [[User:Zaku_Two|Zaku]]<sup>[[User talk:Zaku Two|Talk]]</sup> 00:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
541529 +++$+++ Zaku Two +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541528 +++$+++ 541528 +++$+++ 2007-04-22 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.177306740E09 +++$+++ No problem, then.  +++$+++ :No problem, then. [[User:Zaku_Two|Zaku]]<sup>[[User talk:Zaku Two|Talk]]</sup> 22:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

9841 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-11 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.284261300E09 +++$+++ Who is Winer anyway? I did [http:\/\/www.google.com\/#sclient=psy&hl=en&safe=off&site=&source=hp&q=%22Stan+winer%22+site%3Asa&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=%22Stan+winer%22+site%3Asa&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=280187d6f0589da0 not find] any mention of him in the South African web. I may have found his [http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Stan-Winer\/100000683807099 Facebook page], but he did not seem to have too many friends. --  +++$+++ Who is Winer anyway? I did [http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&safe=off&site=&source=hp&q=%22Stan+winer%22+site%3Asa&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=%22Stan+winer%22+site%3Asa&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=280187d6f0589da0 not find] any mention of him in the South African web. I may have found his [http://www.facebook.com/people/Stan-Winer/100000683807099 Facebook page], but he did not seem to have too many friends. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 20:15, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
9842 +++$+++ Communicat +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9841 +++$+++ 9841 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.284347400E09 +++$+++ Re who is Winer? I don't know about the South African web (didn't even know there's such a thing), but the international web certainly mentions him as the author of numerous web-published and other articles, and the last of his three published books, according to my information, has been downloaded at least two million times from various sites including his own. I've also interviewed him in person and correspond with him from time to time, so I know he definitely exists, (or at least did exist until fairly recently).  +++$+++ : Re who is Winer? I don't know about the South African web (didn't even know there's such a thing), but the international web certainly mentions him as the author of numerous web-published and other articles, and the last of his three published books, according to my information, has been downloaded at least two million times from various sites including his own. I've also interviewed him in person and correspond with him from time to time, so I know he definitely exists, (or at least did exist until fairly recently). [[User:Communicat|Communicat]] ([[User talk:Communicat|talk]]) 20:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
9843 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9841 +++$+++ 9842 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.284348000E09 +++$+++ My mistake! By \"the South African web\" I refer to searching on Google with the directive <code>site:za<\/code>. I accidentally ended up searching in Saudi Arabia :-)  [http:\/\/www.google.com\/#sclient=psy&hl=en&safe=off&site=&source=hp&q=%22Stan+winer%22+site%3Asa&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=%22Stan+winer%22+site%3Aza&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=280187d6f0589da0  Here] is the proper search link. --  +++$+++ ::My mistake! By "the South African web" I refer to searching on Google with the directive <code>site:za</code>. I accidentally ended up searching in Saudi Arabia :-)  [http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&safe=off&site=&source=hp&q=%22Stan+winer%22+site%3Asa&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=%22Stan+winer%22+site%3Aza&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=280187d6f0589da0  Here] is the proper search link. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 20:20, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
9844 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9841 +++$+++ 9842 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.284349320E09 +++$+++ ''P.S'' \u2013 Do you think he would be [[Wikipedia:Notability|so notable]], that we could write an article on him? I would need reliable sources. His texts them self are not a source for anything but his opinion. --  +++$+++ ::''P.S'' – Do you think he would be [[Wikipedia:Notability|so notable]], that we could write an article on him? I would need reliable sources. His texts them self are not a source for anything but his opinion. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 20:42, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
9845 +++$+++ Communicat +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9841 +++$+++ 9844 +++$+++ 2010-09-16 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.284670620E09 +++$+++ When you say \"we\", I hope you're not including me. But if you care to travel to SA, you'll find all his primary historical documentation \/ biographical papers etc neatly filed and publicly accessible in a big file at the official South African History Archive in Pretoria, and more at Witwatersrand University library archives in Johannesburg. Why are you so interested in him?  +++$+++ ::: When you say "we", I hope you're not including me. But if you care to travel to SA, you'll find all his primary historical documentation / biographical papers etc neatly filed and publicly accessible in a big file at the official South African History Archive in Pretoria, and more at Witwatersrand University library archives in Johannesburg. Why are you so interested in him? [[User:Communicat|Communicat]] ([[User talk:Communicat|talk]]) 13:57, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
9846 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9841 +++$+++ 9841 +++$+++ 2010-09-19 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.284893040E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/afraf.oxfordjournals.org\/content\/82\/328\/311.extract Here] are [http:\/\/www.google.com\/url?url=http:\/\/www.withmaliceandforethought.com\/helderberg\/margo_SAHA_guidebook_06.pdf&rct=j&sa=U&ei=0oWVTK-pEIn2Odz2yJ0J&sqi=2&ved=0CDQQFjAH&q=%22stan+winer%22+John+Vorster&usg=AFQjCNE22AvcOiN_qM50N7hXgFVxKEHkMg&cad=rja two] references for future use. --  +++$+++ :[http://afraf.oxfordjournals.org/content/82/328/311.extract Here] are [http://www.google.com/url?url=http://www.withmaliceandforethought.com/helderberg/margo_SAHA_guidebook_06.pdf&rct=j&sa=U&ei=0oWVTK-pEIn2Odz2yJ0J&sqi=2&ved=0CDQQFjAH&q=%22stan+winer%22+John+Vorster&usg=AFQjCNE22AvcOiN_qM50N7hXgFVxKEHkMg&cad=rja two] references for future use. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 03:44, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

534131 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534131 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-02 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.270203540E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone, does Wikipedia accept contributions from the \"propoganda oragn of the Iranian dictatorship\" or is [[Press TV]] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events\/2010_April_1&diff=353473395&oldid=353467237 not a reliable source]? I'm not sure what to do or why Iran has been blacklisted in this particular case. --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ Hi Tone, does Wikipedia accept contributions from the "propoganda oragn of the Iranian dictatorship" or is [[Press TV]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2010_April_1&diff=353473395&oldid=353467237 not a reliable source]? I'm not sure what to do or why Iran has been blacklisted in this particular case. --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 03:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
534132 +++$+++ Candlewicke +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534131 +++$+++ 534131 +++$+++ 2010-04-02 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.270209120E09 +++$+++ Though the same person has on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events\/2010_March_19&diff=351703028&oldid=351306674 two] separate [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events\/2010_March_19&diff=352826618&oldid=352248444 occasions] tried to remove protests by thousands of people outside a UN building covered by the propaganda orange as well as a Malaysian newspaper. Surely that can't be non-notable? --<font face=\"serif\">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style=\"color:red\">can<\/span>]] +++$+++ :Though the same person has on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2010_March_19&diff=351703028&oldid=351306674 two] separate [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2010_March_19&diff=352826618&oldid=352248444 occasions] tried to remove protests by thousands of people outside a UN building covered by the propaganda orange as well as a Malaysian newspaper. Surely that can't be non-notable? --<font face="serif">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|&bull;]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</font> 04:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
534133 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534131 +++$+++ 534132 +++$+++ 2010-04-02 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.270217400E09 +++$+++ You should talk directly to the person who removed those items, I don't think I am the right person to ask... --''' +++$+++ :: You should talk directly to the person who removed those items, I don't think I am the right person to ask... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 07:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

271988 +++$+++ Chairboy +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-23 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.187867520E09 +++$+++ The Maddox linkspam has been removed from the E90 article.  Folks have been blocked for spamming iPhone and E90 articles with it, please refrain from re-adding it.  Yes, Maddox is great and funny, but the link doesn't make the article better. -  +++$+++ The Maddox linkspam has been removed from the E90 article.  Folks have been blocked for spamming iPhone and E90 articles with it, please refrain from re-adding it.  Yes, Maddox is great and funny, but the link doesn't make the article better. - [[User:Chairboy|C<small>HAIRBOY]]</small> ([[User_talk:Chairboy|☎]]) 04:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
271989 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271988 +++$+++ 271988 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.187869620E09 +++$+++ See also: [[WP:AGF]]-- +++$+++ :See also: [[WP:AGF]]--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 04:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
271990 +++$+++ Chairboy +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271988 +++$+++ 271989 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.187898180E09 +++$+++ What does AGF have to do with my request? -  +++$+++ ::What does AGF have to do with my request? - [[User:Chairboy|C<small>HAIRBOY]]</small> ([[User_talk:Chairboy|☎]]) 12:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

534134 +++$+++ Aiken drum +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-04 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.270427400E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone, you may want to protect [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?&diff=353936363 this], as that is not the only instance of this user's disruptive behavior. See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Tanthalas39#Disruptive_editor_on_music_articles this] for more info. Thanks! '''<span style=\"font-family:Century Gothic\"> +++$+++ Hi Tone, you may want to protect [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?&diff=353936363 this], as that is not the only instance of this user's disruptive behavior. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tanthalas39#Disruptive_editor_on_music_articles this] for more info. Thanks! '''<span style="font-family:Century Gothic">[[User:Aiken drum|<span style="color: blue;">Aiken</span>]] [[User talk:Aiken drum|<span style="color: black;">&#9835;</span>]]</span>''' 17:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
534135 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534134 +++$+++ 534134 +++$+++ 2010-04-04 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.270430400E09 +++$+++ User blocked for disruptive editing for one day. I don't think that protection is needed at the moment but let me know if this repeats in the future. --''' +++$+++ : User blocked for disruptive editing for one day. I don't think that protection is needed at the moment but let me know if this repeats in the future. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

271992 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-27 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.188208860E09 +++$+++ The disruption you accuse me of can only go on as long as [[User:Wibbble]] engages me for it.  Only once have I posted without it being a direct response to that editor.  I assure you that I do not continue my argument for the sake of ego, proving anyone wrong, or disrpution, but because I sincerely believe that this change will improve the article to those who read it.-- +++$+++ The disruption you accuse me of can only go on as long as [[User:Wibbble]] engages me for it.  Only once have I posted without it being a direct response to that editor.  I assure you that I do not continue my argument for the sake of ego, proving anyone wrong, or disrpution, but because I sincerely believe that this change will improve the article to those who read it.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 03:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
271993 +++$+++ Chairboy +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 271992 +++$+++ 271992 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.188210480E09 +++$+++ I'm absolutely certain you do, I'm not accusing you of editing in bad faith.  But your insistence is bordering on disruption, hence my gentle suggestion that you reconsider.  You don't believe me, and that's fine, perhaps you should request external comment.  I think Wibble is arguing from a point supported by policy and our style guide, and you aren't, but you're welcome to seek out another opinion.  If we all agreed all the time, it'd be boring.  One thing that puzzles me is the subject of your message, where does objectivity come in?  You didn't mention it in your message, seems a bit like a stinky fish. -  +++$+++ :I'm absolutely certain you do, I'm not accusing you of editing in bad faith.  But your insistence is bordering on disruption, hence my gentle suggestion that you reconsider.  You don't believe me, and that's fine, perhaps you should request external comment.  I think Wibble is arguing from a point supported by policy and our style guide, and you aren't, but you're welcome to seek out another opinion.  If we all agreed all the time, it'd be boring.  One thing that puzzles me is the subject of your message, where does objectivity come in?  You didn't mention it in your message, seems a bit like a stinky fish. - [[User:Chairboy|C<small>HAIRBOY]]</small> ([[User_talk:Chairboy|☎]]) 03:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

9850 +++$+++ Shell_Kinney +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9850 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-14 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.284504000E09 +++$+++ You've made a statement[https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Amendment&diff=374604571&oldid=374584903] at the newest EEML request that claims the mailing list was primarily directed at you and your \"supposed\" real life identity.  As I've already mentioned to you once, while it perfectly acceptable to make the link yourself (in no uncertain terms)[https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Aleksander_Laak&diff=prev&oldid=378780875] and later decide that perhaps you didn't want to release that information [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Aleksander_Laak&diff=prev&oldid=383420597], it is completely inappropriate that you attempt to tar and feather editors for \"outing\" you based on your own edits.  I would also suggest that making obviously false claims (the mailing list being mostly about you) is both disruptive and detrimental to any point you're trying to make.  It might help if you took a bit of a break from dealing with editors who weer involved in the EEML case since interacting with them seems to bring out the worst in you at the moment.   +++$+++ You've made a statement[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment&diff=374604571&oldid=374584903] at the newest EEML request that claims the mailing list was primarily directed at you and your "supposed" real life identity.  As I've already mentioned to you once, while it perfectly acceptable to make the link yourself (in no uncertain terms)[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Talk:Aleksander_Laak&diff=prev&oldid=378780875] and later decide that perhaps you didn't want to release that information [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Talk:Aleksander_Laak&diff=prev&oldid=383420597], it is completely inappropriate that you attempt to tar and feather editors for "outing" you based on your own edits.  I would also suggest that making obviously false claims (the mailing list being mostly about you) is both disruptive and detrimental to any point you're trying to make.  It might help if you took a bit of a break from dealing with editors who weer involved in the EEML case since interacting with them seems to bring out the worst in you at the moment.  [[User:Shell_Kinney|Shell]]   <sup>[[User_talk:Shell_Kinney|babelfish]]</sup> 15:40, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
9851 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9850 +++$+++ 9850 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.284504900E09 +++$+++ I will think about this. --  +++$+++ :I will think about this. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 15:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

9852 +++$+++ Chipmunkdavis +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9852 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-14 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.284508140E09 +++$+++ Bold move! (not that I don't agree) Anyway, you removed the dates (1912-1913) from the title. Was this intentional? I'm just wondering, as some said the dates should be there, but I guess if there's no similar events it doesn't need to be.  +++$+++ Bold move! (not that I don't agree) Anyway, you removed the dates (1912-1913) from the title. Was this intentional? I'm just wondering, as some said the dates should be there, but I guess if there's no similar events it doesn't need to be. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|Chipmunkdavis]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 16:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
9853 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9852 +++$+++ 9852 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.284508440E09 +++$+++ There is no need for disambiguation, not at least until we have some other article on some other Balkan occupation. I do not know if the [[Russo-Turkish War (1877\u20131878)]] ever reached [[Ottoman Albania]]. --  +++$+++ :There is no need for disambiguation, not at least until we have some other article on some other Balkan occupation. I do not know if the [[Russo-Turkish War (1877–1878)]] ever reached [[Ottoman Albania]]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 16:54, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
9854 +++$+++ Alexikoua +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9852 +++$+++ 9853 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.284522960E09 +++$+++ but the Venetians reached Albania for sure, see [[Venetian Albania]]. +++$+++ ::but the Venetians reached Albania for sure, see [[Venetian Albania]].[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 20:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
9855 +++$+++ Chipmunkdavis +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9852 +++$+++ 9853 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.284508860E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure there was a defined Albania then anyway. The Albania form 1912-1913 was, as noted throughout the...discussion, accepted as an autonomous albanian area by the Ottomans at the time. Anyway, thanks for clarifying!  +++$+++ ::I'm not sure there was a defined Albania then anyway. The Albania form 1912-1913 was, as noted throughout the...discussion, accepted as an autonomous albanian area by the Ottomans at the time. Anyway, thanks for clarifying! [[User:Chipmunkdavis|Chipmunkdavis]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 17:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
9856 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9852 +++$+++ 9855 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.284517440E09 +++$+++ Bold indeed.  I'm not sure a non-admin can close a page move like that.  I also see no consensus for [[Occupation of Ottoman Albania]], which I find problematic for the reasons I will outline in the talkpage.  +++$+++ :::Bold indeed.  I'm not sure a non-admin can close a page move like that.  I also see no consensus for [[Occupation of Ottoman Albania]], which I find problematic for the reasons I will outline in the talkpage. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean|talk]]) 19:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
9857 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9852 +++$+++ 9856 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.284522300E09 +++$+++ Please read [[Wikipedia:Requested moves\/Closing instructions]]. If you want to file any more complaints, I suggest you speak to [[User:Sandstein]]. He may however have zero understanding for \"Balkanic silliness\". I must also warn you that he has a habit of blocking habitual ethnic warriors on sight. --  +++$+++ ::::Please read [[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions]]. If you want to file any more complaints, I suggest you speak to [[User:Sandstein]]. He may however have zero understanding for "Balkanic silliness". I must also warn you that he has a habit of blocking habitual ethnic warriors on sight. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 20:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
9858 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9852 +++$+++ 9857 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.284522960E09 +++$+++ I have an even better idea [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Inappropriate_closing_of_page_move.2C_threats_by_User:Petri_Krohn].  +++$+++ :::::I have an even better idea [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Inappropriate_closing_of_page_move.2C_threats_by_User:Petri_Krohn]. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean|talk]]) 20:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
9859 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9852 +++$+++ 9858 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.284527040E09 +++$+++ I really do not understand the Balkans. Now you lost and the Albanians won. Are you happy now? --  +++$+++ ::::::I really do not understand the Balkans. Now you lost and the Albanians won. Are you happy now? -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 22:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

534143 +++$+++ Marcus Aurelius Antoninus +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534143 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-05 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.270528260E09 +++$+++ Any reason not to move Bombings \u2192 bombings?  +++$+++ Any reason not to move Bombings → bombings? [[User:Marcus Aurelius Antoninus|Marcus Aurelius Antoninus]] ([[User talk:Marcus Aurelius Antoninus|talk]]) 21:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
534144 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534143 +++$+++ 534143 +++$+++ 2010-04-05 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.270528440E09 +++$+++ Fixed, must have missed that... Thanks. --''' +++$+++ : Fixed, must have missed that... Thanks. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
534145 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534143 +++$+++ 534143 +++$+++ 2010-04-07 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.270685580E09 +++$+++ Hi. Instead of restoring the article, I think a better idea would be to start the article from beginning and rewrite it. The deleted version needed much improvements to get to the encyclopedic style and I believe it will be faster if you write it again - it was not that long anyway. Let me know if you need any help. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Instead of restoring the article, I think a better idea would be to start the article from beginning and rewrite it. The deleted version needed much improvements to get to the encyclopedic style and I believe it will be faster if you write it again - it was not that long anyway. Let me know if you need any help. Regards, --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

272000 +++$+++ Mikerussell +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-03 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.188871260E09 +++$+++ Hi there, thanks for you interest in detail and correct US Census figures. I appreciate that its important to list correct, unifrom census figures, but I don't think it is necessary or desirable to enter into the HTML coded references that only limit free editing. You have no reason to insert shouting points (All capitals) that really make the article look amateurish and part of a petty fight. The talk page is the place to respond to issues. Could you make an effort to entend your desire to make census articles uniform across all articles to the actual HTML of each article. Thanks -- +++$+++ Hi there, thanks for you interest in detail and correct US Census figures. I appreciate that its important to list correct, unifrom census figures, but I don't think it is necessary or desirable to enter into the HTML coded references that only limit free editing. You have no reason to insert shouting points (All capitals) that really make the article look amateurish and part of a petty fight. The talk page is the place to respond to issues. Could you make an effort to entend your desire to make census articles uniform across all articles to the actual HTML of each article. Thanks --[[User:Mikerussell|Mikerussell]] 19:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
272001 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272000 +++$+++ 272000 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.188871320E09 +++$+++ Please see my response on the talk page.-- +++$+++ :Please see my response on the talk page.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] 19:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

534146 +++$+++ Aregakn +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-07 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.270704180E09 +++$+++ Thank you in advance.  +++$+++ Thank you in advance. [[User:Aregakn|Aregakn]] ([[User talk:Aregakn|talk]]) 22:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
534147 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534146 +++$+++ 534146 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.271349600E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I must have missed your message... Which image have I deleted, let me know so that I can check. --''' +++$+++ : Sorry, I must have missed your message... Which image have I deleted, let me know so that I can check. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
534148 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534146 +++$+++ 534147 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.271357940E09 +++$+++ No worries, Tone. I left him a message and I think it's resolved! Courtesy of your friendly neighbourhood talk page stalker!  +++$+++ ::No worries, Tone. I left him a message and I think it's resolved! Courtesy of your friendly neighbourhood talk page stalker! [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User_Talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  11:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
534149 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534146 +++$+++ 534148 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.271362200E09 +++$+++ Nice to have a personal secretary :DDD Thanks ;-) --''' +++$+++ ::: Nice to have a personal secretary :DDD Thanks ;-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

263787 +++$+++ 24.126.193.239 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-08 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.157776740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:24.126.193.239|24.126.193.239]] 21:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
263788 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263787 +++$+++ 263787 +++$+++ 2006-09-09 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.157841360E09 +++$+++ It is so obvious that he is not notable per [[WP:BIO]].  +++$+++ :It is so obvious that he is not notable per [[WP:BIO]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

9861 +++$+++ 141.13.170.175 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9861 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-20 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.285030920E09 +++$+++ \u201c...only two hundred yards from the camp.\u201d From which \u201ccamp\u201d?----[[Special:Contributions\/141.13.170.175|141.13.170.175]] ( +++$+++ “...only two hundred yards from the camp.” From which “camp”?----[[Special:Contributions/141.13.170.175|141.13.170.175]] ([[User talk:141.13.170.175|talk]]) 18:02, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
9862 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9861 +++$+++ 9861 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.285031100E09 +++$+++ \"the camp for foreigners at Chambaran in Lyon\" from where he had just escaped? --  +++$+++ :"the camp for foreigners at Chambaran in Lyon" from where he had just escaped? -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 18:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
9863 +++$+++ 141.13.170.175 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9861 +++$+++ 9862 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.285033200E09 +++$+++ \u201cLe plateau de Chambaran\u201d, in France, is situated in the east of the \u201cD\xe9partement de l'[[Is\xe8re]]\u201d, which is to be found in a remarkable distance to Lyon.----[[Special:Contributions\/141.13.170.175|141.13.170.175]] ( +++$+++ ::“Le plateau de Chambaran”, in France, is situated in the east of the “Département de l'[[Isère]]”, which is to be found in a remarkable distance to Lyon.----[[Special:Contributions/141.13.170.175|141.13.170.175]] ([[User talk:141.13.170.175|talk]]) 18:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
9864 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9861 +++$+++ 9863 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.285033440E09 +++$+++ I have no idea where any of these are. You removed the content and the two references. I restored the references and tried to integrate your changes to the old text. The issue should be discussed at [[Talk:Willi M\xfcnzenberg]]. Take it there. --  +++$+++ :::I have no idea where any of these are. You removed the content and the two references. I restored the references and tried to integrate your changes to the old text. The issue should be discussed at [[Talk:Willi Münzenberg]]. Take it there. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 18:44, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
9865 +++$+++ 141.13.170.175 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9861 +++$+++ 9864 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.285033740E09 +++$+++ O.k.----[[Special:Contributions\/141.13.170.175|141.13.170.175]] ( +++$+++ ::::O.k.----[[Special:Contributions/141.13.170.175|141.13.170.175]] ([[User talk:141.13.170.175|talk]]) 18:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

534152 +++$+++ Xeteli +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-18 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.271616540E09 +++$+++ Dear [[User:Tone|Sir]], I\u2019m unable to see the graphs in my [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~soxred93\/pcount\/index.php?name=Xeteli&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia edit count]. I don't know the reason but want it to work automatically as it did. Plz help. Regards -- <span style=\"font-family: Garamond\">''' +++$+++ Dear [[User:Tone|Sir]], I’m unable to see the graphs in my [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pcount/index.php?name=Xeteli&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia edit count]. I don't know the reason but want it to work automatically as it did. Plz help. Regards -- <span style="font-family: Garamond">'''[[User:Xeteli|<big>X</big><small>ETELI</small>]]'''</span>  <sup><span style="font-family: Book Antiqua"><small>[[User talk:Xeteli|(<b style="color:blue;">HELLO</b>)]]{{•w}} [[Special:Contributions/Xeteli|<b style="color:green">FOOTAGE</b>)]]</small></span></sup> 11:49, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
534153 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534152 +++$+++ 534152 +++$+++ 2010-04-18 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.271620140E09 +++$+++ Hi. The content of editcounter occasionally changes. Try creating [[User:Xeteli\/EditCounterOptIn.js]] with any content. I hope that helps. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The content of editcounter occasionally changes. Try creating [[User:Xeteli/EditCounterOptIn.js]] with any content. I hope that helps. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:49, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

9867 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-21 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.285055580E09 +++$+++ You keep arguing about \"content\". You're wrong. Banned users are not allowed to edit. There is no compromise on that point. \u2190 +++$+++ You keep arguing about "content". You're wrong. Banned users are not allowed to edit. There is no compromise on that point. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 00:53, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
9868 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9867 +++$+++ 9867 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.285055700E09 +++$+++ Why do you not keep the issue at AN\/I where it should be. --  +++$+++ :Why do you not keep the issue at AN/I where it should be. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 00:55, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
9869 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9867 +++$+++ 9868 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.285056000E09 +++$+++ Because you continue to make the same bogus argument and you won't respond when it's pointed out that it's bogus. \u2190 +++$+++ ::Because you continue to make the same bogus argument and you won't respond when it's pointed out that it's bogus. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 01:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
9870 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9867 +++$+++ 9869 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.285056240E09 +++$+++ Continuing the argument here is a form of [[WP:HARASS|harassment]]. --  +++$+++ :::Continuing the argument here is a form of [[WP:HARASS|harassment]]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 01:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
9871 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9867 +++$+++ 9870 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.285056360E09 +++$+++ Then come back to ANI and explain yourself. \u2190 +++$+++ ::::Then come back to ANI and explain yourself. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 01:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
9872 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9867 +++$+++ 9870 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.285056780E09 +++$+++ And if you continue to stonewall the discussion, I will recommend that an RFC\/U be filed against you, for proxying edits of a banned user. \u2190 +++$+++ ::::And if you continue to stonewall the discussion, I will recommend that an RFC/U be filed against you, for proxying edits of a banned user. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 01:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
9873 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9867 +++$+++ 9872 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.285059540E09 +++$+++ I've a good mind to file the RFC\/U against you myself. Your actions in this thing have been disgraceful. \u2190 +++$+++ :::::I've a good mind to file the RFC/U against you myself. Your actions in this thing have been disgraceful. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 01:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

534156 +++$+++ Andrejj +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534156 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-22 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.271972340E09 +++$+++ ... in drugi kraji - mislim, da ve\u010dinoma ni pametnega razloga za predlogi. Ena vrstica besedila, info\u0161katla z virom - tukaj res ne more\u0161 navajati ni\u010desar ve\u010d. Se strinja\u0161 z odstranjevanjem? -- +++$+++ ... in drugi kraji - mislim, da večinoma ni pametnega razloga za predlogi. Ena vrstica besedila, infoškatla z virom - tukaj res ne moreš navajati ničesar več. Se strinjaš z odstranjevanjem? --[[User:Andrejj|AndrejJ]] ([[User talk:Andrejj|talk]]) 14:39, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
534157 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534156 +++$+++ 534156 +++$+++ 2010-04-22 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.271979300E09 +++$+++ Ja, itak. Te \u0161katle je nekdo serijsko lepil na \u010dlanke s slovensko tematiko marca 2008, ene par sem jih odstranil, eni so upravi\u010deno tam, ene sem pa spregledal. Kar odstrani, kjer se ti zdi primerno. LP --''' +++$+++ : Ja, itak. Te škatle je nekdo serijsko lepil na članke s slovensko tematiko marca 2008, ene par sem jih odstranil, eni so upravičeno tam, ene sem pa spregledal. Kar odstrani, kjer se ti zdi primerno. LP --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:35, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
534158 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534156 +++$+++ 534156 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.272054120E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article was deleted after a discussion, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/I Could Sleep For A Thousand Years]]. The reasons why it was deleted are there. Therefore, if you want to have it recreated, you have to make a request at [[WP:DRV]] (it is deleted again, this is the policy). And I don't think I've heard from you before, regarding that article... Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article was deleted after a discussion, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Could Sleep For A Thousand Years]]. The reasons why it was deleted are there. Therefore, if you want to have it recreated, you have to make a request at [[WP:DRV]] (it is deleted again, this is the policy). And I don't think I've heard from you before, regarding that article... Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:22, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
534159 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534156 +++$+++ 534156 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.272062280E09 +++$+++ Sure. The procedure is the following. An article is created. Someone finds that the article should not be there and nominates it for deletion. Then, if there is a consensus to delete the article, an admin deletes it (as I did in this case, click the link for the discussion). After the article has been deleted as a result of a discussion, it should not be simply rewritten because any admin will delete it again (as there was a previous consensus to delete). Therefore, an option is to ask for a deletion review (DRV). Then, the decision can be overturned. However, in this specific case, my advise is that you wait until the album is released and generates some responses, such as reviews in acclaimed magazines. Then, you can rewrite the article from beginning and include all that, and then I don't think anyone will complain. But at present, having an article consisting mostly of track list with zero references is a bad idea. I hope that helps, feel free to ask if you have further questions. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Sure. The procedure is the following. An article is created. Someone finds that the article should not be there and nominates it for deletion. Then, if there is a consensus to delete the article, an admin deletes it (as I did in this case, click the link for the discussion). After the article has been deleted as a result of a discussion, it should not be simply rewritten because any admin will delete it again (as there was a previous consensus to delete). Therefore, an option is to ask for a deletion review (DRV). Then, the decision can be overturned. However, in this specific case, my advise is that you wait until the album is released and generates some responses, such as reviews in acclaimed magazines. Then, you can rewrite the article from beginning and include all that, and then I don't think anyone will complain. But at present, having an article consisting mostly of track list with zero references is a bad idea. I hope that helps, feel free to ask if you have further questions. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

263789 +++$+++ 84.64.168.185 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-10 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.157917260E09 +++$+++ JPS, I'm not suprised it was you who blocked me. After all, you and your pedophile friend <small>([[Wikipedia:Remove personal attacks|Personal attack removed]])<!-- Template:RPA --><\/small> (who is thankfully now blocked for soliciting sex from young boys on Wikipedia) have been waging war on my efforts to improve the factual quality of the Dean Gaffney article for months now. Some of the facts about Dean are unpleasant and I can see why they would leave a bitter taste in the mouth of a fervant fan like yourself, but they must be recorded for future generations to know exactly how greasy and unpleasant he is. Unfortunatly I don't have the mop, so you and your pedophile cronies have control over the Gaffney article for the moment. This whole episode is a disgusting reminder of the kind of fanatical perverts that Gaffney attracts to his fanbase, corrupt administrators and those who prey on young children. I see you are interested in taboo language. If I ever see you in real life I'll have a few choice phrases for you to do a bit of research on. Rot in hell, you sick worthless freak. -- +++$+++ JPS, I'm not suprised it was you who blocked me. After all, you and your pedophile friend <small>([[Wikipedia:Remove personal attacks|Personal attack removed]])<!-- Template:RPA --></small> (who is thankfully now blocked for soliciting sex from young boys on Wikipedia) have been waging war on my efforts to improve the factual quality of the Dean Gaffney article for months now. Some of the facts about Dean are unpleasant and I can see why they would leave a bitter taste in the mouth of a fervant fan like yourself, but they must be recorded for future generations to know exactly how greasy and unpleasant he is. Unfortunatly I don't have the mop, so you and your pedophile cronies have control over the Gaffney article for the moment. This whole episode is a disgusting reminder of the kind of fanatical perverts that Gaffney attracts to his fanbase, corrupt administrators and those who prey on young children. I see you are interested in taboo language. If I ever see you in real life I'll have a few choice phrases for you to do a bit of research on. Rot in hell, you sick worthless freak. --[[User:84.64.168.185|84.64.168.185]] 12:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
263790 +++$+++ AnemoneProjectors +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263789 +++$+++ 263789 +++$+++ 2006-09-10 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.157930460E09 +++$+++ Wow, that's a bit harsh! --  +++$+++ :Wow, that's a bit harsh! -- [[User:AnemoneProjectors|AnemoneProjectors]] ([[User talk:AnemoneProjectors|talk]]) 16:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
263791 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263789 +++$+++ 263790 +++$+++ 2006-09-10 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.157931240E09 +++$+++ lol. You get used to it. I find it funny, actually.  +++$+++ ::lol. You get used to it. I find it funny, actually. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
263792 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263789 +++$+++ 263789 +++$+++ 2006-09-11 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.158027240E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Salim_Saifullah_Khan&diff=75061288&oldid=75060745 This edit] is completely unacceptible.  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Salim_Saifullah_Khan&diff=75061288&oldid=75060745 This edit] is completely unacceptible. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
263793 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263789 +++$+++ 263789 +++$+++ 2006-09-11 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.158027900E09 +++$+++ Edits like the one I have pointed you towards are not acceptable. That is why I am warning you. They are against Wikipedia's policy. Your above message is also a persoanl attack. This might also get you blocked. And please sign your posts using <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>  +++$+++ :Edits like the one I have pointed you towards are not acceptable. That is why I am warning you. They are against Wikipedia's policy. Your above message is also a persoanl attack. This might also get you blocked. And please sign your posts using <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
263794 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263789 +++$+++ 263789 +++$+++ 2006-09-11 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.158028800E09 +++$+++ Yeah -- really it was a non-notable mascot of a non-notable pizza shop.  +++$+++ :Yeah -- really it was a non-notable mascot of a non-notable pizza shop. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

9874 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9874 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-22 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.285159140E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 05:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
9875 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9874 +++$+++ 9874 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.285159380E09 +++$+++ As to your question, the [[Federal Bureau of Prisons]] may be accurate, but it is a [[primary source]]\xa0and thus unusable in a [[WP:BLP]]. --  +++$+++ :As to your question, the [[Federal Bureau of Prisons]] may be accurate, but it is a [[primary source]] and thus unusable in a [[WP:BLP]]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 05:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
9876 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9874 +++$+++ 9875 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.285159500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 05:45, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
9877 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9874 +++$+++ 9876 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 05:53:00 +++$+++ 1.285159980E09 +++$+++ As to the name in Arabic, he has spent most of his life in Arab countries and most references to him are in fact in Arabic. --  +++$+++ :::As to the name in Arabic, he has spent most of his life in Arab countries and most references to him are in fact in Arabic. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 05:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
9878 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9874 +++$+++ 9877 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.285160400E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... Maybe I could see what kind of noticeboard would discuss that. Lemme see if I can fetch a link...  +++$+++ ::::Hmmm... Maybe I could see what kind of noticeboard would discuss that. Lemme see if I can fetch a link... [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 06:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
9879 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9874 +++$+++ 9878 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 06:14:00 +++$+++ 1.285161240E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biography#Arabic_name_posting_for_a_non-Arab_person]]  +++$+++ :::::[[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biography#Arabic_name_posting_for_a_non-Arab_person]] [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 06:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

613315 +++$+++ Hrafn +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-24 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.219603080E09 +++$+++ Silly question I know, but [[User:Firefly322]]'s latest effort, [[Issues in Science and Religion]] really takes the cake. What does one do when an incredibly thin-skinned editor insists on repeatedly creating incredibly badly written articles on topics that in many cases would survive an AfD (as their topics meet the bare minimum of [[WP:NOTE]]), but contain little if any useful information? I don't see how the creation of such articles is in violation of policy (though his incendiary defences of them against attempt at correction of their deficiencies often are), but nor do I see such articles doing more than cluttering up wikipedia. <font face=\"Antiqua, serif\">'' +++$+++ Silly question I know, but [[User:Firefly322]]'s latest effort, [[Issues in Science and Religion]] really takes the cake. What does one do when an incredibly thin-skinned editor insists on repeatedly creating incredibly badly written articles on topics that in many cases would survive an AfD (as their topics meet the bare minimum of [[WP:NOTE]]), but contain little if any useful information? I don't see how the creation of such articles is in violation of policy (though his incendiary defences of them against attempt at correction of their deficiencies often are), but nor do I see such articles doing more than cluttering up wikipedia. <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub>''</font> 11:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
613316 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613315 +++$+++ 613315 +++$+++ 2008-08-24 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.219613640E09 +++$+++ It's actually an interesting topic, so I've added a request to improve the article so that it actually tells us something more about the book than just the index. No doubt there'll be a response. . .  +++$+++ :It's actually an interesting topic, so I've added a request to improve the article so that it actually tells us something more about the book than just the index. No doubt there'll be a response. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 14:34, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

534165 +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534165 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-09 06:15:00 +++$+++ 1.273410900E09 +++$+++ Hey! I've just noticed that, ages ago, you deleted [[Semiramis (band)]], for some surely wrong reason. Since it clearly deserves at least a small stub, is there any chance to recover the informations of that article? Grazie e buon lavoro. -- +++$+++ Hey! I've just noticed that, ages ago, you deleted [[Semiramis (band)]], for some surely wrong reason. Since it clearly deserves at least a small stub, is there any chance to recover the informations of that article? Grazie e buon lavoro. --[[User:Attilios|&#39;&#39;&#39;Attilios&#39;&#39;&#39;]] ([[User talk:Attilios|talk]]) 06:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
534166 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534165 +++$+++ 534165 +++$+++ 2010-05-09 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.273455360E09 +++$+++ Hi. That was a prod deletion. A standard procedure is that if anyone objects the deletion, the article gets restored, what I just did. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. That was a prod deletion. A standard procedure is that if anyone objects the deletion, the article gets restored, what I just did. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:36, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

272022 +++$+++ Masterpiece2000 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-08 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.194555180E09 +++$+++ Hello Loodog. I removed Category:Jewish American scientists and added Category:American Jews. Is there anything wrong with that? Look, I am still a new user. I don't understand all the rules. Regards,  +++$+++ Hello Loodog. I removed Category:Jewish American scientists and added Category:American Jews. Is there anything wrong with that? Look, I am still a new user. I don't understand all the rules. Regards, [[User:Masterpiece2000|Masterpiece2000]] 12:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
272023 +++$+++ Masterpiece2000 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272022 +++$+++ 272022 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.194628200E09 +++$+++ I have recategorized all the pages with the category [[:Category:Jewish American scientists]] and changed my vote to 'Neutral' on CfD. Regards,  +++$+++ :I have recategorized all the pages with the category [[:Category:Jewish American scientists]] and changed my vote to 'Neutral' on CfD. Regards, [[User:Masterpiece2000|Masterpiece2000]] 09:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

569625 +++$+++ Onorem +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-17 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.169081340E09 +++$+++ Hello.  Just wanted to say thanks for noticing and reverting the vandalism on my talk page. <br> Looks like you also blocked the editor, so thanks for that too. -- +++$+++ Hello.  Just wanted to say thanks for noticing and reverting the vandalism on my talk page. <br> Looks like you also blocked the editor, so thanks for that too. --[[User:Onorem|Onorem]] 16:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
569626 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569625 +++$+++ 569625 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.169081460E09 +++$+++ No problem, happy to help.  +++$+++ :No problem, happy to help. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 16:51, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

9880 +++$+++ Communicat +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9880 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-01 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.285998180E09 +++$+++ Meanwhile, I've not forgotten the Aftermath project. Will get down to it soon. Regards.  +++$+++ Meanwhile, I've not forgotten the Aftermath project. Will get down to it soon. Regards. [[User:Communicat|Communicat]] ([[User talk:Communicat|talk]]) 22:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
9881 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9880 +++$+++ 9880 +++$+++ 2010-10-02 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.286013660E09 +++$+++ I suggested the article because I thought you would be more familiar with the subject than the people now working on the article. More important, you might be able to find and evaluate sources. The article is under some kind of pressure. --  +++$+++ :I suggested the article because I thought you would be more familiar with the subject than the people now working on the article. More important, you might be able to find and evaluate sources. The article is under some kind of pressure. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 03:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
9882 +++$+++ Communicat +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9880 +++$+++ 9881 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.286171940E09 +++$+++ Hi, yes I'm familiar with the subject, thanks for the offer, but am not inclined to get involved there, nor with any of the various other South African party-political type articles, which are similarly in a shambolic mess, (just like the everyday politics of the country itself). Speaking about a shambles, maybe these links might be of interest to you: [http:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/thunderblogs\/archives\/davesmith_au08\/091226_wikiwoes.htm here 1] and [http:\/\/www.thunderbolts.info\/thunderblogs\/guest1.htm here 2]  +++$+++ :: Hi, yes I'm familiar with the subject, thanks for the offer, but am not inclined to get involved there, nor with any of the various other South African party-political type articles, which are similarly in a shambolic mess, (just like the everyday politics of the country itself). Speaking about a shambles, maybe these links might be of interest to you: [http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/davesmith_au08/091226_wikiwoes.htm here 1] and [http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/guest1.htm here 2] [[User:Communicat|Communicat]] ([[User talk:Communicat|talk]]) 22:59, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

9883 +++$+++ Blue-Haired Lawyer +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-03 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.286132520E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=State&action=historysubmit&diff=388288330&oldid=388278234 My recent edit to State] was clearly not vandalism, and by labelling it otherwise you are being grossly insulting. Please withdraw this assertion. \u2014  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State&action=historysubmit&diff=388288330&oldid=388278234 My recent edit to State] was clearly not vandalism, and by labelling it otherwise you are being grossly insulting. Please withdraw this assertion. — [[User:Blue-Haired Lawyer|Blue-Haired Lawyer]] <sup>[[User talk:Blue-Haired Lawyer|t]]</sup> 12:02, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
9884 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9883 +++$+++ 9883 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.286135520E09 +++$+++ I apologize, I misread the edit history, and did not notice you had edited the article after Collect's revert. --  +++$+++ :I apologize, I misread the edit history, and did not notice you had edited the article after Collect's revert. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 12:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
9885 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9883 +++$+++ 9883 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.286136300E09 +++$+++ As to my other reasons for reverting, the page has finally stabilized, so I am afraid any tweaking can escalate into an extended round of [[WP:BRD]] if not outright edit warring. --  +++$+++ :As to my other reasons for reverting, the page has finally stabilized, so I am afraid any tweaking can escalate into an extended round of [[WP:BRD]] if not outright edit warring. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 13:05, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
9886 +++$+++ Blue-Haired Lawyer +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9883 +++$+++ 9885 +++$+++ 2010-10-04 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.286259600E09 +++$+++ Thank you. \u2014  +++$+++ ::Thank you. — [[User:Blue-Haired Lawyer|Blue-Haired Lawyer]] <sup>[[User talk:Blue-Haired Lawyer|t]]</sup> 23:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

534174 +++$+++ Wolfkeeper +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534174 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-02 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.275525720E09 +++$+++ Thanks-- <small> +++$+++ Thanks-- <small>[[User_talk:Wolfkeeper|''Wolfkeeper'']]</small> 17:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
534175 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534174 +++$+++ 534174 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.275526080E09 +++$+++ Ok, maybe I would have to close it as a non consensus (still resulting in keeping it). But certainly, I did not see there would be a consensus to delete... --''' +++$+++ : Ok, maybe I would have to close it as a non consensus (still resulting in keeping it). But certainly, I did not see there would be a consensus to delete... --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:48, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
534176 +++$+++ Wolfkeeper +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534174 +++$+++ 534175 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.275531720E09 +++$+++ Yes, please do that, if you change it to non consensus then it stops people quoting it as if it was decided by the review when it wasn't.- <small> +++$+++ ::Yes, please do that, if you change it to non consensus then it stops people quoting it as if it was decided by the review when it wasn't.- <small>[[User_talk:Wolfkeeper|''Wolfkeeper'']]</small> 19:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
534177 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534174 +++$+++ 534176 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.275534600E09 +++$+++ Done. Yeah, that seems a better closure now. Thanks. --''' +++$+++ ::: Done. Yeah, that seems a better closure now. Thanks. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:10, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

9888 +++$+++ Bbeehvh +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9888 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-06 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.286402040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Bbeehvh|Bbeehvh]] ([[User talk:Bbeehvh|talk]]) 14:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
9889 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9888 +++$+++ 9888 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.286402820E09 +++$+++ I have not \"undone\" your work. In [[International law and the Arab\u2013Israeli conflict]] I accepted 4 out of your 7 edits. --  +++$+++ :I have not "undone" your work. In [[International law and the Arab–Israeli conflict]] I accepted 4 out of your 7 edits. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 15:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
9890 +++$+++ Bbeehvh +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9888 +++$+++ 9889 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.286403900E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, can you explain then your changes?   +++$+++ :: Fair enough, can you explain then your changes?  [[User:Bbeehvh|Bbeehvh]] ([[User talk:Bbeehvh|talk]]) 15:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
9891 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9888 +++$+++ 9890 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.286404020E09 +++$+++ You removed a reference, that is a ''no-no'' on Wikipedia. I did not see you other edits useful \u2013 at least not worth the effort of separating them by hand from your offending edit. I have now restored the wikilink to [[ Arab Peace Initiative]]. --  +++$+++ :::You removed a reference, that is a ''no-no'' on Wikipedia. I did not see you other edits useful – at least not worth the effort of separating them by hand from your offending edit. I have now restored the wikilink to [[ Arab Peace Initiative]]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 15:27, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

272034 +++$+++ Threeafterthree +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-12 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.197505980E09 +++$+++ Or will it get nuked you think? TIA -- +++$+++ Or will it get nuked you think? TIA --[[User:Threeafterthree|Tom]] 16:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
272035 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272034 +++$+++ 272034 +++$+++ 2007-12-13 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.197541020E09 +++$+++ Ha.  I didn't know he had a story.  Though I'm pretty sure that article will eventually get removed as nonnotable.-- +++$+++ :Ha.  I didn't know he had a story.  Though I'm pretty sure that article will eventually get removed as nonnotable.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 02:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

534179 +++$+++ Tariqabjotu +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-12 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.276391160E09 +++$+++ Note that I placed [[Wikipedia_talk:In_the_news#ITN_rules_suspended_for_World_Cup|a comment at WP:ITNT]] about the re-addition of the World Cup to ITN. -- ''' +++$+++ Note that I placed [[Wikipedia_talk:In_the_news#ITN_rules_suspended_for_World_Cup|a comment at WP:ITNT]] about the re-addition of the World Cup to ITN. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 18:06, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
534180 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534179 +++$+++ 534179 +++$+++ 2010-06-12 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.276403880E09 +++$+++ Now there's a link at the bottom, I don't mind removing the link in the top. --''' +++$+++ : Now there's a link at the bottom, I don't mind removing the link in the top. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:38, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

9892 +++$+++ Abd +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-08 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.286529060E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/meta.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Spam_blacklist&oldid=2152618#Copyright_of_pre-prints permanent link]. It suddenly all came back to me! I got into this mess with the topic that I'd better not mention at the moment, because of some commentary of yours on [[User Talk:Jehochman]]. Troublemaker!!! Well, I've also sent you an email. -- +++$+++ [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Spam_blacklist&oldid=2152618#Copyright_of_pre-prints permanent link]. It suddenly all came back to me! I got into this mess with the topic that I'd better not mention at the moment, because of some commentary of yours on [[User Talk:Jehochman]]. Troublemaker!!! Well, I've also sent you an email. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 02:11, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
9893 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9892 +++$+++ 9892 +++$+++ 2010-10-08 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.286530920E09 +++$+++ It seems both of us have had conflicts on Wikipedia that have sparked real world carriers. I too have been in contact with important and influential people. Unfortunately, what they have said has not always [[User:Petri Krohn#Quote of the month|been as nice]]. --  +++$+++ :It seems both of us have had conflicts on Wikipedia that have sparked real world carriers. I too have been in contact with important and influential people. Unfortunately, what they have said has not always [[User:Petri Krohn#Quote of the month|been as nice]]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 02:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
9894 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9892 +++$+++ 9892 +++$+++ 2010-10-08 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.286531520E09 +++$+++ ''P.S.'' \u2013 I did not know your interest in <s>retracted<\/s> [[common cold]] was sparked by my comment at [[User Talk:Jehochman]]! If that is so, then I deserve at least acknowledgement for your acknowledgement. And if your $100  gadget is of some use [[Free energy suppression|to something]], then maybe the spam blacklist was useful after all. --  +++$+++ :''P.S.'' – I did not know your interest in <s>retracted</s> [[common cold]] was sparked by my comment at [[User Talk:Jehochman]]! If that is so, then I deserve at least acknowledgement for your acknowledgement. And if your $100  gadget is of some use [[Free energy suppression|to something]], then maybe the spam blacklist was useful after all. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 02:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

534181 +++$+++ TK5610L +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-13 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.276416900E09 +++$+++ I understand why [[Hear It See It Music]] was deleted, better placed in the article [[Musical Notation Internet Publishing]]. I\u2019m still working on [[Musical Notation Internet Publishing]], esp. need to add more content to clarify. Can you tell me a bit more about the re-nomination to delete process? The one objection I heard has been taken care of (as best I know). Please help this new editor \/ slow learner, your insight is appreciated.  +++$+++ I understand why [[Hear It See It Music]] was deleted, better placed in the article [[Musical Notation Internet Publishing]]. I’m still working on [[Musical Notation Internet Publishing]], esp. need to add more content to clarify. Can you tell me a bit more about the re-nomination to delete process? The one objection I heard has been taken care of (as best I know). Please help this new editor / slow learner, your insight is appreciated. [[User:TK5610L|TK5610L]] ([[User talk:TK5610L|talk]]) 01:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
534182 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534181 +++$+++ 534181 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.276465380E09 +++$+++ Hi. I see the other article was nominated for deletion as well. Try to improve the article and participate in that debate, then there's a chance. Regarding the renomination, the proper place is [[WP:DRV]], present the case there and provide some more content that could be used in the article. I hope I answered, otherwise let me know. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I see the other article was nominated for deletion as well. Try to improve the article and participate in that debate, then there's a chance. Regarding the renomination, the proper place is [[WP:DRV]], present the case there and provide some more content that could be used in the article. I hope I answered, otherwise let me know. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:43, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

9895 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-08 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.286597580E09 +++$+++ Please discuss issues on the talk page instead of reverting back and forth repeatedly. -- ''' +++$+++ Please discuss issues on the talk page instead of reverting back and forth repeatedly. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 21:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
9896 +++$+++ Marknutley +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9895 +++$+++ 9895 +++$+++ 2010-10-08 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.286605740E09 +++$+++ Petri, i am surprised that you would revet back in those ref names. They are terrible man, i`m guessing you did not notice them and you ought to say sorry to o2rr for bringing this to the BLN board. I know your a good editor but i reckon you made a mistake here mate  +++$+++ :Petri, i am surprised that you would revet back in those ref names. They are terrible man, i`m guessing you did not notice them and you ought to say sorry to o2rr for bringing this to the BLN board. I know your a good editor but i reckon you made a mistake here mate [[User:Marknutley|mark nutley]] ([[User talk:Marknutley|talk]]) 23:29, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

272040 +++$+++ NJGW +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-08 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.199836980E09 +++$+++ Hi, first off, I just noticed new urbanism today.  I'm wondering about the section you deleted from peak oil:  is your only issue with it that it mentions new urbanism?  I tried to soften the statement about that \"movement\", and I don't think it's a plug (though maybe it belongs in the peak oil mitigation section more than the main article).  I believe thre rest of the section is based on the writtings of [[James Howard Kunstler]] and others, so it's hardly OR.  I do think some discussion of suburbs could go there (as I'm sure do those who wrote the section), so care to help flesh out what you would consider acceptable?   +++$+++ Hi, first off, I just noticed new urbanism today.  I'm wondering about the section you deleted from peak oil:  is your only issue with it that it mentions new urbanism?  I tried to soften the statement about that "movement", and I don't think it's a plug (though maybe it belongs in the peak oil mitigation section more than the main article).  I believe thre rest of the section is based on the writtings of [[James Howard Kunstler]] and others, so it's hardly OR.  I do think some discussion of suburbs could go there (as I'm sure do those who wrote the section), so care to help flesh out what you would consider acceptable?  [[User:NJGW|NJGW]] ([[User talk:NJGW|talk]]) 16:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
272041 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272040 +++$+++ 272040 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.199838480E09 +++$+++ If there had been a single source in that section making the point it makes, I would have had no problem with it.  But as it stands, it reeks of \"I told ya so\" from the Smart Growthers and New Urbanists, promising energy-profligate suburbs to be \"slums of the future\".  Speaking of which, what is this quoting?  There's no source saying it.  There's also no guarantee a lack of oil, out of all energy sources, will strand our suburbanites.-- +++$+++ :If there had been a single source in that section making the point it makes, I would have had no problem with it.  But as it stands, it reeks of "I told ya so" from the Smart Growthers and New Urbanists, promising energy-profligate suburbs to be "slums of the future".  Speaking of which, what is this quoting?  There's no source saying it.  There's also no guarantee a lack of oil, out of all energy sources, will strand our suburbanites.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 16:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
272042 +++$+++ NJGW +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272040 +++$+++ 272041 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.199839140E09 +++$+++ So if I cite one source from Kunstler you'd be satisfied that the section can stay?   +++$+++ ::So if I cite one source from Kunstler you'd be satisfied that the section can stay?  [[User:NJGW|NJGW]] ([[User talk:NJGW|talk]]) 16:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
272043 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272040 +++$+++ 272042 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.199839380E09 +++$+++ As much of the section as appears in the source.-- +++$+++ :::As much of the section as appears in the source.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 16:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
272044 +++$+++ NJGW +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272040 +++$+++ 272043 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.199839860E09 +++$+++ And do you consider any mention of \"new urbanism\" to be a plug?  In my opinion that's a bit extreme, as any mention of mitigation forms (as in hybrids, wind energy etc.) would be plugs by the same rational.  +++$+++ ::::And do you consider any mention of "new urbanism" to be a plug?  In my opinion that's a bit extreme, as any mention of mitigation forms (as in hybrids, wind energy etc.) would be plugs by the same rational. [[User:NJGW|NJGW]] ([[User talk:NJGW|talk]]) 16:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
272045 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272040 +++$+++ 272044 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.199840340E09 +++$+++ I mostly see it as a plug because of the lack of sources, but also because the availability of one energy source is, at best, peripherally related to housing patterns.-- +++$+++ :::::I mostly see it as a plug because of the lack of sources, but also because the availability of one energy source is, at best, peripherally related to housing patterns.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 16:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
272046 +++$+++ NJGW +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272040 +++$+++ 272045 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.199846760E09 +++$+++ I've added references to Kunstler's book on the subject, as well as a video lecture he gave at [[TED (conference)|TED]] 2004.  I also added other forms of mitigation so it doesn't seem like a plug for \"new urbanism\". I've moved this conversation to the [[talk:Peak oil|Peak oil talk page]].   +++$+++ ::::::I've added references to Kunstler's book on the subject, as well as a video lecture he gave at [[TED (conference)|TED]] 2004.  I also added other forms of mitigation so it doesn't seem like a plug for "new urbanism". I've moved this conversation to the [[talk:Peak oil|Peak oil talk page]].  [[User:NJGW|NJGW]] ([[User talk:NJGW|talk]]) 18:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

9897 +++$+++ The Four Deuces +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9897 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-09 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.286664780E09 +++$+++ I would prefer one of the articles to be called \"Left-wing terrorism\" which is a category actually used in the literature.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Terrorism#Types_of_Terrorism]  You could ask for help at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Socialism]], although that page seems to attract little discussion.  Otherwise you could contact the 17 project members listed.  You could also look to see if there already is an article about revolutionary violence.  I notice there is an article called [[Revolutionary terror]].   +++$+++ I would prefer one of the articles to be called "Left-wing terrorism" which is a category actually used in the literature.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism#Types_of_Terrorism]  You could ask for help at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Socialism]], although that page seems to attract little discussion.  Otherwise you could contact the 17 project members listed.  You could also look to see if there already is an article about revolutionary violence.  I notice there is an article called [[Revolutionary terror]].  [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 15:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
9898 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9897 +++$+++ 9897 +++$+++ 2010-10-09 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.286667840E09 +++$+++ A have tagged the article with a {{tl|Merge-from}} template. The article seems to be a [[WP:POVFORK]] or duplicate of [[Communist terrorism]], or at least the content now being pushed to that article. --  +++$+++ : A have tagged the article with a {{tl|Merge-from}} template. The article seems to be a [[WP:POVFORK]] or duplicate of [[Communist terrorism]], or at least the content now being pushed to that article. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 16:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

534187 +++$+++ Altafqadir +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534187 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-29 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.277832600E09 +++$+++ I had written an article \"Insurance Companies in Pakistan\" which was deleted. I wanted to rename it as \"List of Pakistan's Insurance Companies\" or \"List of Insurance Companies in Pakistan\". At present, I do not have the record of the changes I made or the complete list of those companies mentioned in the article. kindly restore that article so that I shall link some pages which are already on wikipedia and the article I shall write in future, as soon as I shall have time to write about these companies. I already have written one in this regard. Providing the link for the convenience, was my primary purpose behind writing the article \"Insurance Companies in Pakistan\" which I shall rename as \"List of Insurance Companies in Pakistan\". In this regard, your guidance will help me.  +++$+++ I had written an article "Insurance Companies in Pakistan" which was deleted. I wanted to rename it as "List of Pakistan's Insurance Companies" or "List of Insurance Companies in Pakistan". At present, I do not have the record of the changes I made or the complete list of those companies mentioned in the article. kindly restore that article so that I shall link some pages which are already on wikipedia and the article I shall write in future, as soon as I shall have time to write about these companies. I already have written one in this regard. Providing the link for the convenience, was my primary purpose behind writing the article "Insurance Companies in Pakistan" which I shall rename as "List of Insurance Companies in Pakistan". In this regard, your guidance will help me. [[User:Altafqadir|Altafqadir]] ([[User talk:Altafqadir|talk]]) 10:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
534188 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534187 +++$+++ 534187 +++$+++ 2010-06-29 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.277842380E09 +++$+++ Hi. The article got deleted after a [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Insurance Companies in Pakistan|deletion discussion]], so it would not be a good idea to bring it back and just rename it. What seems to suffice would be [[:Category:Insurance companies of Pakistan]] which does the job of listing them. Of course, those with their articles. So maybe it is better to start with those first... Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. The article got deleted after a [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insurance Companies in Pakistan|deletion discussion]], so it would not be a good idea to bring it back and just rename it. What seems to suffice would be [[:Category:Insurance companies of Pakistan]] which does the job of listing them. Of course, those with their articles. So maybe it is better to start with those first... Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

541530 +++$+++ 24.136.230.38 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541530 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-25 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.177558080E09 +++$+++ Can you revert vandalism on [[Dog]] by [[User:Mcan2|Mcan2]], please? The page is semi-protected, and being an anon, I cannot edit it. -- +++$+++ Can you revert vandalism on [[Dog]] by [[User:Mcan2|Mcan2]], please? The page is semi-protected, and being an anon, I cannot edit it. --[[User:24.136.230.38|24.136.230.38]] 20:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
541531 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541530 +++$+++ 541530 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.177558320E09 +++$+++ Consider it done.  Just out of curiosity, since you seem a conscientious enough guy\/gal, why don't you sign up for an account so you can take care of vandalism like this on your own?  It takes like thirty seconds.   +++$+++ :Consider it done.  Just out of curiosity, since you seem a conscientious enough guy/gal, why don't you sign up for an account so you can take care of vandalism like this on your own?  It takes like thirty seconds.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 20:32, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
541532 +++$+++ Mordicai +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541530 +++$+++ 541531 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.177560180E09 +++$+++ Just [[Special:Userlogin|create an account]] by following the link, if you want.  -- +++$+++ ::Just [[Special:Userlogin|create an account]] by following the link, if you want.  --[[User:Mordicai|mordicai.]] 21:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

9901 +++$+++ Marknutley +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9901 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-14 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.287106080E09 +++$+++ Your funny, you ask me to reinsert a BLP violation as i had broken the 1R on the article, so you went and put it back yourself along with the same BLP violation? I reccomend you self revert  +++$+++ Your funny, you ask me to reinsert a BLP violation as i had broken the 1R on the article, so you went and put it back yourself along with the same BLP violation? I reccomend you self revert [[User:Marknutley|mark ]] ([[User talk:Marknutley|talk]]) 18:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
9902 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9901 +++$+++ 9901 +++$+++ 2010-10-14 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.287107640E09 +++$+++ I have not yet made a single revert today. Collect objected to an earlier version, claiming weasel words. I agreed, and proposed an other version that addressed the issue. As for your BLP claim, my first version may have implied that [[R. J. Rummel]] is anti-communist \u2013 he is. The second version makes no such implication. --  +++$+++ :I have not yet made a single revert today. Collect objected to an earlier version, claiming weasel words. I agreed, and proposed an other version that addressed the issue. As for your BLP claim, my first version may have implied that [[R. J. Rummel]] is anti-communist – he is. The second version makes no such implication. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 18:54, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
9903 +++$+++ Marknutley +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9901 +++$+++ 9902 +++$+++ 2010-10-14 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.287107820E09 +++$+++ You reinserted the same basic contested text twice Petri, it is a revert and you know it  +++$+++ ::You reinserted the same basic contested text twice Petri, it is a revert and you know it [[User:Marknutley|mark ]] ([[User talk:Marknutley|talk]]) 18:57, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

532801 +++$+++ Kneale +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-08 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.181357160E09 +++$+++ Hi, I was wondering if you could undelete [[RAC AutoWindscreens]] - there was a merge tag on it and I didn't get round to merging it with [[RAC plc]]. I would appreciate it if you could undelete it for one day and I will see if there is actually anything worth merging. I will then tag it for speedy deletion again. Thanks -  +++$+++ Hi, I was wondering if you could undelete [[RAC AutoWindscreens]] - there was a merge tag on it and I didn't get round to merging it with [[RAC plc]]. I would appreciate it if you could undelete it for one day and I will see if there is actually anything worth merging. I will then tag it for speedy deletion again. Thanks - [[User:Kneale|Kneale]] 19:46, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
532802 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532801 +++$+++ 532801 +++$+++ 2007-06-08 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.181358060E09 +++$+++ Ok, done. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, done. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 20:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
532803 +++$+++ Kneale +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532801 +++$+++ 532801 +++$+++ 2007-06-09 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.181421480E09 +++$+++ All merged, thanks for your assistance -  +++$+++ * All merged, thanks for your assistance - [[User:Kneale|Kneale]] 13:38, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
532804 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532801 +++$+++ 532801 +++$+++ 2007-06-09 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.181430120E09 +++$+++ Ok, I will restore it and list it on AfD. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, I will restore it and list it on AfD. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 16:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
532805 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532801 +++$+++ 532804 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.181535180E09 +++$+++ For future reference (this one is snowballing delete, good job finding it!), the good thing about listing such useless articles on AfD is that although it wastes the community's time considering them, once deleted a recreation automatically fails CSD G4.  +++$+++ :: For future reference (this one is snowballing delete, good job finding it!), the good thing about listing such useless articles on AfD is that although it wastes the community's time considering them, once deleted a recreation automatically fails CSD G4. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 21:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

9904 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-14 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.287112800E09 +++$+++ Hi, I saw your comment and didn't think that was the case, could you point me to the detail, thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, I saw your comment and didn't think that was the case, could you point me to the detail, thanks. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 20:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
9905 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9904 +++$+++ 9904 +++$+++ 2010-10-14 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.287113820E09 +++$+++ I may be off-base here (and I'm definitely not Petri)  but I interpret a 1Rrrestrcton as limiting you to one Revert per day, but other edits, that would not be construed as reverts, would not count against the \"limit\" (in quotes, because it isn't really an allowance, but you know what I mean)--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ :I may be off-base here (and I'm definitely not Petri)  but I interpret a 1Rrrestrcton as limiting you to one Revert per day, but other edits, that would not be construed as reverts, would not count against the "limit" (in quotes, because it isn't really an allowance, but you know what I mean)--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 20:37, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
9906 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9904 +++$+++ 9905 +++$+++ 2010-10-14 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.287114780E09 +++$+++ Hi, I also see it that way  and when I was on a six week one revert condition  was informed in no uncertain terms, to stick to that, no mention of a Bold revert discuss exception?  +++$+++ ::Hi, I also see it that way  and when I was on a six week one revert condition  was informed in no uncertain terms, to stick to that, no mention of a Bold revert discuss exception? [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 20:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

534193 +++$+++ ToddSurfs +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-07 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.278515100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:ToddSurfs|ToddSurfs]] ([[User talk:ToddSurfs|talk]]) 08:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
534194 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534193 +++$+++ 534193 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.278516240E09 +++$+++ Hi. Since the article was deleted in the prod process, I will restore it. However, I will send it to AFD as there were strong arguments in favour of deletion - so let the community decide. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Since the article was deleted in the prod process, I will restore it. However, I will send it to AFD as there were strong arguments in favour of deletion - so let the community decide. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

525939 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525939 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-11 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.147371600E09 +++$+++ Someone has decided our portal deserves to be deleted.  Could use your vote [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Portal\/Proposals#.5B.5BPortal:United_States_Marine_Corps.5D.5D.E2.80.94.5B.5BPortal:Military_of_Australia.5D.5D_.E2.86.92_.5B.5BPortal:Military.5D.5D here].  If there are others you know that can give us a vote please put the word out. -- +++$+++ Someone has decided our portal deserves to be deleted.  Could use your vote [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Portal/Proposals#.5B.5BPortal:United_States_Marine_Corps.5D.5D.E2.80.94.5B.5BPortal:Military_of_Australia.5D.5D_.E2.86.92_.5B.5BPortal:Military.5D.5D here].  If there are others you know that can give us a vote please put the word out. --[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 11:20, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
525940 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525939 +++$+++ 525939 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.147372920E09 +++$+++ I voted to keep the USMC portal.  +++$+++ *I voted to keep the USMC portal. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 11:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

9908 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-14 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.287117480E09 +++$+++ \"By definition WP:BRD is not edit warring\" - but this is not related to ''edit warring'' but one revert conditions?   +++$+++ "By definition WP:BRD is not edit warring" - but this is not related to ''edit warring'' but one revert conditions?  [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 21:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
9909 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9908 +++$+++ 9908 +++$+++ 2010-10-14 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.287118620E09 +++$+++ [[WP:3RR|1\/3RR]] only applies to edit warring. Per Wikipedia:Edit warring: ''[[Wikipedia:Edit warring#What edit warring is|This is known as the bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle, and is not edit warring.]]'' --  +++$+++ :[[WP:3RR|1/3RR]] only applies to edit warring. Per Wikipedia:Edit warring: ''[[Wikipedia:Edit warring#What edit warring is|This is known as the bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle, and is not edit warring.]]'' -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 21:57, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
9910 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9908 +++$+++ 9909 +++$+++ 2010-10-14 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.287119040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for posting the assertions, I would like to get some admin feedback on the issue and will post you a link if I find anything out, thanks.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for posting the assertions, I would like to get some admin feedback on the issue and will post you a link if I find anything out, thanks. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 22:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
9911 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9908 +++$+++ 9908 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.287277200E09 +++$+++ - There is some discussion and comment [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:TFOWR#RFC here], as I read it it seems if a user had one revert and they then made another and claimed BRD they would be hard pressed to get support for that claim.  +++$+++ * - There is some discussion and comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TFOWR#RFC here], as I read it it seems if a user had one revert and they then made another and claimed BRD they would be hard pressed to get support for that claim. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 18:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

324784 +++$+++ Cbradshaw +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ 324784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-27 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.204116600E09 +++$+++ Incidently, I noticed you have been having some conflict over the entry of Singapore in the Olympics Template.  I made a specific template for the YOG a few days ago which is on all the relevant pages.  Naturally, it is the only city listed right now.  I hope that works as a compromise for you.  Cheers-- +++$+++ Incidently, I noticed you have been having some conflict over the entry of Singapore in the Olympics Template.  I made a specific template for the YOG a few days ago which is on all the relevant pages.  Naturally, it is the only city listed right now.  I hope that works as a compromise for you.  Cheers--[[User:Cbradshaw|Cbradshaw]] ([[User talk:Cbradshaw|talk]]) 04:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
324785 +++$+++ Cbradshaw +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ 324784 +++$+++ 324784 +++$+++ 2008-02-27 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.204119660E09 +++$+++ As for the template, it is merely an adaptaion of the existing template, so if you find it poorly made, you're welcome to improve it.  I will not merge it however, and I think the concensus I have read prefers a separate template.  I do agree with you that the 2010 YOG should not be devalued \"merely\" because they are the Junior edition, but there was discussion at some length a few months ago that editors did not want the YOG cities listed on the main template.  (Can't remember where though, maybe the Olympics project) If you have an issue with that, you may want to start another discussion. Cheers-- +++$+++ :As for the template, it is merely an adaptaion of the existing template, so if you find it poorly made, you're welcome to improve it.  I will not merge it however, and I think the concensus I have read prefers a separate template.  I do agree with you that the 2010 YOG should not be devalued "merely" because they are the Junior edition, but there was discussion at some length a few months ago that editors did not want the YOG cities listed on the main template.  (Can't remember where though, maybe the Olympics project) If you have an issue with that, you may want to start another discussion. Cheers--[[User:Cbradshaw|Cbradshaw]] ([[User talk:Cbradshaw|talk]]) 05:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

272054 +++$+++ Raime +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-28 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.201523040E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to let you know that I tagged three non-free images that you uploaded, [[:Image:Waterplacetower.jpg]], [[:Image:Westinres.JPG]], and [[:Image:Waterplacecondos.JPG]] for speedy deletion per CSD1, as the Residences at the Westin is now complete and the Waterplace Towers are very near completion. I went out and took a few photos of the buildings, and uploaded two, [[:Image:Waterplace Providence.JPG]] and [[:Image:Residences Westin Providence.JPG]], to use in place of the non-free ones. I apologize for the poor image quality... I will try and get some better ones to upload soon. Cheers,  +++$+++ I just wanted to let you know that I tagged three non-free images that you uploaded, [[:Image:Waterplacetower.jpg]], [[:Image:Westinres.JPG]], and [[:Image:Waterplacecondos.JPG]] for speedy deletion per CSD1, as the Residences at the Westin is now complete and the Waterplace Towers are very near completion. I went out and took a few photos of the buildings, and uploaded two, [[:Image:Waterplace Providence.JPG]] and [[:Image:Residences Westin Providence.JPG]], to use in place of the non-free ones. I apologize for the poor image quality... I will try and get some better ones to upload soon. Cheers, [[User:Raime|<font color="blue" ><b>Rai</b></font>]]-[[User talk:Raime|<font color="green" ><b><i>me</i></b></font>]] 04:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
272055 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272054 +++$+++ 272054 +++$+++ 2008-01-28 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.201523040E09 +++$+++ K.  Good work.-- +++$+++ :K.  Good work.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 04:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

9912 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-14 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.287115740E09 +++$+++ Petri, not knowing whether you are watchlisting my talk page, I'll follow-up here : I appreciate your thanks, although I do feel like a boy sticking a finger in a dike, that page gives me  the feeling it could turn into a disaster. I appreciate that you supported your edit with a reference, which is the main reason I said I didn't have a problem with it. That said, I like it when the lede is a summary of material in the main article, so I wish the discussion were about the appropriate paragraph for the main part of the article, then later decide it is deserves a mention in the lede. However, I tried reading the talk page, and it I quite contentious and involved, so I'm not optimistic.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ Petri, not knowing whether you are watchlisting my talk page, I'll follow-up here : I appreciate your thanks, although I do feel like a boy sticking a finger in a dike, that page gives me  the feeling it could turn into a disaster. I appreciate that you supported your edit with a reference, which is the main reason I said I didn't have a problem with it. That said, I like it when the lede is a summary of material in the main article, so I wish the discussion were about the appropriate paragraph for the main part of the article, then later decide it is deserves a mention in the lede. However, I tried reading the talk page, and it I quite contentious and involved, so I'm not optimistic.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 21:09, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
9913 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9912 +++$+++ 9912 +++$+++ 2010-10-14 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.287115980E09 +++$+++ Did you also remember to read all the 23 archives :-) --  +++$+++ :Did you also remember to read all the 23 archives :-) -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 21:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

272057 +++$+++ Crips r us +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-29 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.201673580E09 +++$+++ Do you live in Rhode Island? I live in Providence. +++$+++ Do you live in Rhode Island? I live in Providence.[[User:Crips r us|Crips r us]] ([[User talk:Crips r us|talk]]) 22:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
272058 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272057 +++$+++ 272057 +++$+++ 2008-01-29 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.201676520E09 +++$+++ I don't live there now, but I lived in Providence.-- +++$+++ :I don't live there now, but I lived in Providence.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 23:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

272059 +++$+++ Crips r us +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-29 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.201674180E09 +++$+++ Could you tell me about the RI Film Festival? I tried but I really didn't get it. +++$+++ Could you tell me about the RI Film Festival? I tried but I really didn't get it.[[User:Crips r us|Crips r us]] ([[User talk:Crips r us|talk]]) 22:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
272060 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272059 +++$+++ 272059 +++$+++ 2008-01-29 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.201676520E09 +++$+++ It's an event where they show independent films.  It takes place thorough Providence and the films are always interesting and unique.-- +++$+++ :It's an event where they show independent films.  It takes place thorough Providence and the films are always interesting and unique.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 23:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

534206 +++$+++ Ron Ritzman +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-28 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.282985460E09 +++$+++ Another editor has started a [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Incidents#Merge_and_delete.3F|discussion]] at ANI concerning your close of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of newly-formed bus routes in Brooklyn]]. -- +++$+++ Another editor has started a [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Merge_and_delete.3F|discussion]] at ANI concerning your close of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of newly-formed bus routes in Brooklyn]]. --[[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 01:51, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
534207 +++$+++ Protonk +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534206 +++$+++ 534206 +++$+++ 2010-08-28 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.282989600E09 +++$+++ It's no big deal.  You deleted [[List of newly-formed bus routes in Brooklyn]] which unbeknownst to you or any of the AfD participants (and not surprising given that no actual record of the merge took place) was merged into [[List of bus routes in Brooklyn]] somewhere between 3 years ago and now.  In order to preserve attribution I restored the article, redirected it and left talk page notes on both articles.  +++$+++ *It's no big deal.  You deleted [[List of newly-formed bus routes in Brooklyn]] which unbeknownst to you or any of the AfD participants (and not surprising given that no actual record of the merge took place) was merged into [[List of bus routes in Brooklyn]] somewhere between 3 years ago and now.  In order to preserve attribution I restored the article, redirected it and left talk page notes on both articles. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 03:00, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
534208 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534206 +++$+++ 534207 +++$+++ 2010-08-28 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.283040120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that. --''' +++$+++ :: Thanks for that. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

272064 +++$+++ Millbrooky +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272064 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-29 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.204344540E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Millbrooky|Millbrooky]] ([[User talk:Millbrooky|talk]]) 20:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
272065 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272064 +++$+++ 272064 +++$+++ 2008-02-29 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.204344720E09 +++$+++ There may well be more updated numbers for any given system, but this is a relative ranking we're doing.  We can't very well start comparing ridership at different points in time, much less by different reporting authorities.  Local agencies tend to overestimate for the same reason that local population estimates tend to go over.  If an agency is covered in the APTA report, we must use it.  Alternative sources should only be used when APTA has nothing to say.-- +++$+++ :There may well be more updated numbers for any given system, but this is a relative ranking we're doing.  We can't very well start comparing ridership at different points in time, much less by different reporting authorities.  Local agencies tend to overestimate for the same reason that local population estimates tend to go over.  If an agency is covered in the APTA report, we must use it.  Alternative sources should only be used when APTA has nothing to say.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 20:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
272066 +++$+++ Millbrooky +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272064 +++$+++ 272064 +++$+++ 2008-02-29 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.204354920E09 +++$+++ Understood, but then there are 6 transit systems that don't use the APTA as their source for ridership data.  Why is using old non-APTA data on the NJ systems acceptable when new non-APTA data is not?  Should we remove the cities that the APTA does not list or at least remove the ridership data? -- +++$+++ :Understood, but then there are 6 transit systems that don't use the APTA as their source for ridership data.  Why is using old non-APTA data on the NJ systems acceptable when new non-APTA data is not?  Should we remove the cities that the APTA does not list or at least remove the ridership data? --[[User:Millbrooky|Millbrooky]] ([[User talk:Millbrooky|talk]]) 23:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
272067 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272064 +++$+++ 272066 +++$+++ 2008-03-01 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.204414980E09 +++$+++ Oh, that was my fault.  I thought we were currently using APTA data on them.  Carry on.-- +++$+++ ::Oh, that was my fault.  I thought we were currently using APTA data on them.  Carry on.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 15:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

9921 +++$+++ Netalarm +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-03 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.288774500E09 +++$+++ Content appears clean... I think? If I missed anything, feel free to remove it (those sites).  +++$+++ Content appears clean... I think? If I missed anything, feel free to remove it (those sites). [[User:Netalarm|<font color="#00AA11">'''Netalarm'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Netalarm|<font color="#FF9933">'''talk'''</font>]]</sup> 01:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
9922 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9921 +++$+++ 9921 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.288775040E09 +++$+++ Thanks! --  +++$+++ :Thanks! -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 02:04, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

534210 +++$+++ Jusdafax +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-02 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.283461980E09 +++$+++ Hi Tone. Thanks for your help on the ITN article. I left a message at ITN you may not have seen regarding the hopeful inclusion of the article photo. I have changed the blurb to add (pictured). I think the article is better served with photo that is with the article and that is also on the ITN page. I will continue to monitor the situation for any possible needed updates (as I write the hurricane has not yet turned to the north as the weather forecasters were expecting.) I have also updated the article's talk page with the ITN template. And of least importance, I didn't get my \"reward\" template on my talk page... silly, I know, but I do like to see them! Thanks again for your help,  +++$+++ Hi Tone. Thanks for your help on the ITN article. I left a message at ITN you may not have seen regarding the hopeful inclusion of the article photo. I have changed the blurb to add (pictured). I think the article is better served with photo that is with the article and that is also on the ITN page. I will continue to monitor the situation for any possible needed updates (as I write the hurricane has not yet turned to the north as the weather forecasters were expecting.) I have also updated the article's talk page with the ITN template. And of least importance, I didn't get my "reward" template on my talk page... silly, I know, but I do like to see them! Thanks again for your help, [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]]   14:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
534211 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534210 +++$+++ 534210 +++$+++ 2010-09-02 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.283464500E09 +++$+++ Hi. I see the photo has been added already. Well, I somehow don't like giving those credits while some people like them... you can add one yourself, nothing wrong with that. After all, good work with the nomination. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. I see the photo has been added already. Well, I somehow don't like giving those credits while some people like them... you can add one yourself, nothing wrong with that. After all, good work with the nomination. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
534212 +++$+++ Jusdafax +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534210 +++$+++ 534211 +++$+++ 2010-09-02 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.283465160E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Yes, I see the photo was added, excellent. As for my 'reward', I'm somewhat vain, and can't find it proper somehow to reward myself for an ITN... though, I ''do'' have a self-award on my User page about my time spent on Wikipedia and number of edits. Well, it's all good; the main thing was to get that item posted. Thanks again!  +++$+++ ::Thanks. Yes, I see the photo was added, excellent. As for my 'reward', I'm somewhat vain, and can't find it proper somehow to reward myself for an ITN... though, I ''do'' have a self-award on my User page about my time spent on Wikipedia and number of edits. Well, it's all good; the main thing was to get that item posted. Thanks again! [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]]   15:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
534213 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534210 +++$+++ 534210 +++$+++ 2010-09-05 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.283671140E09 +++$+++ You're right, but the image isn't hosted on Wikipedia, it's on the [[Wikimedia Commons]], so you would have to make your request at [[commons:COM:AN]].  +++$+++ :You're right, but the image isn't hosted on Wikipedia, it's on the [[Wikimedia Commons]], so you would have to make your request at [[commons:COM:AN]]. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  00:19, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

9923 +++$+++ The Four Deuces +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-03 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.288789920E09 +++$+++ It seems strange because the evidence I presented was persuasive and the evidence you presented was conclusive.  If mark nutley was not behind those edits then it is even more important that we find out who was.  I sent a note to Newyorkbrad about this.  I let the last SPI go because I thought mark nutley would stop, but you have shown that it was not an isolated event.  I would not assume that they are cooperating off-wiki - it is more likely that they just think alike.  But we should ensure that this issue is properly investigated.  The argument that CU has cleared mark nutley is just absurd.   +++$+++ It seems strange because the evidence I presented was persuasive and the evidence you presented was conclusive.  If mark nutley was not behind those edits then it is even more important that we find out who was.  I sent a note to Newyorkbrad about this.  I let the last SPI go because I thought mark nutley would stop, but you have shown that it was not an isolated event.  I would not assume that they are cooperating off-wiki - it is more likely that they just think alike.  But we should ensure that this issue is properly investigated.  The argument that CU has cleared mark nutley is just absurd.  [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 06:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
9924 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9923 +++$+++ 9923 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.288845240E09 +++$+++ A related SPI case of a user using the same anonymizing proxy network is here: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations\/UGAdawgs2010\/Archive]]. --  +++$+++ :A related SPI case of a user using the same anonymizing proxy network is here: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UGAdawgs2010/Archive]]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 21:34, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
9925 +++$+++ The Four Deuces +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9923 +++$+++ 9924 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.288951380E09 +++$+++ There is a page devoted to this, [[WP:OP]] - didn't know if you knew about it.  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=394692649 Here] is a link to the closing of the recent ANI.   +++$+++ ::There is a page devoted to this, [[WP:OP]] - didn't know if you knew about it.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=394692649 Here] is a link to the closing of the recent ANI.  [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 03:03, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
9926 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9923 +++$+++ 9925 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.288952340E09 +++$+++ I know now! I have been posting there all day. --  +++$+++ :::I know now! I have been posting there all day. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
9927 +++$+++ The Four Deuces +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9923 +++$+++ 9926 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.288959240E09 +++$+++ I looked to see if one of your IPs had edited and found that IP69.91.223.154 had edited [[Cinnamon Gardens]].[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Cinnamon_Gardens&limit=500&action=history]  Looking at the edit history, I found that various IPs have been reversing editors with accounts.  It seems that there is a long list of potential IPs.  I checked the first few but could not find them on the OP page.   +++$+++ ::::I looked to see if one of your IPs had edited and found that IP69.91.223.154 had edited [[Cinnamon Gardens]].[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cinnamon_Gardens&limit=500&action=history]  Looking at the edit history, I found that various IPs have been reversing editors with accounts.  It seems that there is a long list of potential IPs.  I checked the first few but could not find them on the OP page.  [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 05:14, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

272068 +++$+++ Diza +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272068 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-01 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.204362420E09 +++$+++ hi. please refrain from sequentially erasing whole sections of articles just because you disapprove of their content. the OR claims is meant as a general guide line for the quality of the text, not as an excuse to erase it. moreover, The fact tag request on most of them was less than a week old. more specifically this kind of article, by it's title is meant to make \"Arguments\", if you believe these are wrongly attributed to people, please feel free to use the \"cite\" tag. thank you.-- +++$+++ hi. please refrain from sequentially erasing whole sections of articles just because you disapprove of their content. the OR claims is meant as a general guide line for the quality of the text, not as an excuse to erase it. moreover, The fact tag request on most of them was less than a week old. more specifically this kind of article, by it's title is meant to make "Arguments", if you believe these are wrongly attributed to people, please feel free to use the "cite" tag. thank you.--[[User:Diza|<font color="DarkGreen">Procrastinating'''@'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Diza|talk2me]]</sup> 01:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
272069 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272068 +++$+++ 272068 +++$+++ 2008-03-07 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.204937400E09 +++$+++ That misses the point.  If you update these, you won't be using the same source for all of them.  These are comparative rankings.  To use difference sources, or worse, different points in time, is terrible practice.-- +++$+++ :That misses the point.  If you update these, you won't be using the same source for all of them.  These are comparative rankings.  To use difference sources, or worse, different points in time, is terrible practice.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 16:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

534214 +++$+++ Cacoethes curiositas +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534214 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-05 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.283672340E09 +++$+++ wait tildes, oh  +++$+++ wait tildes, oh [[User:Cacoethes curiositas|Cacoethes curiositas]] ([[User talk:Cacoethes curiositas|talk]]) 00:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
534215 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 534214 +++$+++ 534214 +++$+++ 2010-09-13 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.284437760E09 +++$+++ Hi. Sure, I'll unprotect it so you can edit it. By the way, the article was deleted after a discussion, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Codendi]] - make sure to address all the issues. Best, --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Sure, I'll unprotect it so you can edit it. By the way, the article was deleted after a discussion, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codendi]] - make sure to address all the issues. Best, --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 21:16, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

272071 +++$+++ CSZero +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272071 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-19 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.205981220E09 +++$+++ No, I'm not looking for a gold star.  I'm looking for a better way to word that sentence, because \"8th largest\" sounds silly - that's pretty far down the list.  How would you suggest we word it so that it is clear that there are many, many cities in Massachusetts with between 80,000 and 100,000 residents?  I feel that the factual answer of \"8th largest\" is misleading in spirit.  +++$+++ No, I'm not looking for a gold star.  I'm looking for a better way to word that sentence, because "8th largest" sounds silly - that's pretty far down the list.  How would you suggest we word it so that it is clear that there are many, many cities in Massachusetts with between 80,000 and 100,000 residents?  I feel that the factual answer of "8th largest" is misleading in spirit. [[User:CSZero|CSZero]] ([[User talk:CSZero|talk]]) 19:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
272072 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272071 +++$+++ 272071 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.205981340E09 +++$+++ It's a simple honest fact.  If it sounds unimpressive, tough.  Readers know that rankings don't give regard for relative gaps between consecutive items.-- +++$+++ :It's a simple honest fact.  If it sounds unimpressive, tough.  Readers know that rankings don't give regard for relative gaps between consecutive items.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 19:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

9928 +++$+++ The Four Deuces +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-05 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.289000580E09 +++$+++ The ANI is now closed and it would be best not to comment on it.  I understand that the assumption of bad faith for your work must be irritating, especially when you made no comments about any editor's postings off-wiki.  In future of course it will be possible to check these IPs before submitting them to SPI, which will avoid these types of reactions.  Among those opposing the SPI were editors who have received sanctions for editing at Climate change, Eastern Europe, the British far right and U.S. politics, all from a right-wing perspective.  Whether or not that influenced their approach is something that you may decide.  The evidence you brought to SPI has not been erased but is being reviewed by Arbcom and there is no need to discuss it further at least until they have decided.  In the meantime your work in finding OPs should be helpful across a range of articles including many you have never edited.   +++$+++ The ANI is now closed and it would be best not to comment on it.  I understand that the assumption of bad faith for your work must be irritating, especially when you made no comments about any editor's postings off-wiki.  In future of course it will be possible to check these IPs before submitting them to SPI, which will avoid these types of reactions.  Among those opposing the SPI were editors who have received sanctions for editing at Climate change, Eastern Europe, the British far right and U.S. politics, all from a right-wing perspective.  Whether or not that influenced their approach is something that you may decide.  The evidence you brought to SPI has not been erased but is being reviewed by Arbcom and there is no need to discuss it further at least until they have decided.  In the meantime your work in finding OPs should be helpful across a range of articles including many you have never edited.  [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 16:43, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
9929 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9928 +++$+++ 9928 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.289001180E09 +++$+++ I find it weird, that no one informed me of the multiple discussions all around Wikipedia about the SPI case and my actions in it. I have belatedly stated my views \"for the record\" here: [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#Apparent legal threat on talk page of blocked user]]. Nobody seems to to have paid much attention, except maybe those persistently [[WP:WIKIHOUNDING|stalking]] my edits. --  +++$+++ :I find it weird, that no one informed me of the multiple discussions all around Wikipedia about the SPI case and my actions in it. I have belatedly stated my views "for the record" here: [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Apparent legal threat on talk page of blocked user]]. Nobody seems to to have paid much attention, except maybe those persistently [[WP:WIKIHOUNDING|stalking]] my edits. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 16:53, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

534217 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-29 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.148965500E09 +++$+++ So, when you find a question in a user's talk page, like in my case, he has most likely answered in the other's talk page. Talk pages are somewhat like \"private\" messages, so unless you want to say something or someone asked you something, don't reply in third's conversations. Hope it is clear :-) --  +++$+++ So, when you find a question in a user's talk page, like in my case, he has most likely answered in the other's talk page. Talk pages are somewhat like "private" messages, so unless you want to say something or someone asked you something, don't reply in third's conversations. Hope it is clear :-) -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 22:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
534218 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534217 +++$+++ 534217 +++$+++ 2006-05-29 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.148965800E09 +++$+++ Replied on user's talk page.  +++$+++ :Replied on user's talk page. [[User:DoomsDay349|DoomsDay349]] 22:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

394871 +++$+++ Alison +++$+++ Luvcraft +++$+++ 394871 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-17 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.187335440E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I'm really sorry but I had to close your RfA per [[WP:SNOW]] as it was rapidly heading into failure. May I suggest you get a few more months editing behind you then possibly apply again when, hopefully, things will be a lot different? Really sorry -  +++$+++ Hi there. I'm really sorry but I had to close your RfA per [[WP:SNOW]] as it was rapidly heading into failure. May I suggest you get a few more months editing behind you then possibly apply again when, hopefully, things will be a lot different? Really sorry - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#558; font-family: comic sans ms; font-variant: small-caps">'''A<font color= "#7070a0">l<font color= "#9090c0">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] [[User talk:Alison|☺]] 00:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
394872 +++$+++ Politics rule +++$+++ Luvcraft +++$+++ 394871 +++$+++ 394871 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.187336040E09 +++$+++ Per Alison!  +++$+++ :Per Alison! [[User:Politics rule|Politics rule]] 00:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

272076 +++$+++ Canyouhearmenow +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272076 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-10 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.207827840E09 +++$+++ Hello Loodog. I want to let you know that you can change the source on the Charlotte page back to the [[Census Bureau]] as a source. I have researched this and I have also consulted with another [[admin]] and we both have agreed that the census source is going to be the best one to deal with. I hope this helps. If the other editor continues to ignore and revert the edit, then we will have no other choice but to block or to ask for a 3RR review. I hope this helps.  +++$+++ Hello Loodog. I want to let you know that you can change the source on the Charlotte page back to the [[Census Bureau]] as a source. I have researched this and I have also consulted with another [[admin]] and we both have agreed that the census source is going to be the best one to deal with. I hope this helps. If the other editor continues to ignore and revert the edit, then we will have no other choice but to block or to ask for a 3RR review. I hope this helps. [[User:Canyouhearmenow|Canyouhearmenow]] 04:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
272077 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272076 +++$+++ 272076 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.207856220E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that's a 3RR violation.  Time to report him.-- +++$+++ :Yeah, that's a 3RR violation.  Time to report him.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 12:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
272078 +++$+++ Canyouhearmenow +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272076 +++$+++ 272077 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.207858620E09 +++$+++ Ok, I have looked at the [[US Census Bureau]] and here is a link that needs to be used [http:\/\/www.fedstats.gov\/qf\/states\/37\/37119.html]. As you can see, neither one of your numbers are correct according to the bureau's web site. The source that you put on is not referenced correctly and it leads you to an excel spead sheet. We cannot use that. Also, when you are sourcing, it is better to use cite web with your sourcing and referencing. Here is a link to a very easy way to [[cite web]]. Make sure to give the publisher and to add a quote. [http:\/\/diberri.dyndns.org\/wikipedia\/templates]. I hope this will help. I also hope that this issue between you and the other editor can be fixed. As I agree with you that your source is the better and more reliable one, I have to also acknowledge that his is not unsourcable either. Try to be a little kinder and explain why you feel the way you do about your edit. Remember that through this media, we are not looking each other in the face so the remarks we make via these talk pages may not seem as nice or be relayed the exact way we meant for them to be. Just a thought to keep in mind.. Have fun and let me know if I can be of further assistance.  +++$+++ ::Ok, I have looked at the [[US Census Bureau]] and here is a link that needs to be used [http://www.fedstats.gov/qf/states/37/37119.html]. As you can see, neither one of your numbers are correct according to the bureau's web site. The source that you put on is not referenced correctly and it leads you to an excel spead sheet. We cannot use that. Also, when you are sourcing, it is better to use cite web with your sourcing and referencing. Here is a link to a very easy way to [[cite web]]. Make sure to give the publisher and to add a quote. [http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/templates]. I hope this will help. I also hope that this issue between you and the other editor can be fixed. As I agree with you that your source is the better and more reliable one, I have to also acknowledge that his is not unsourcable either. Try to be a little kinder and explain why you feel the way you do about your edit. Remember that through this media, we are not looking each other in the face so the remarks we make via these talk pages may not seem as nice or be relayed the exact way we meant for them to be. Just a thought to keep in mind.. Have fun and let me know if I can be of further assistance. [[User:Canyouhearmenow|Canyouhearmenow]] 13:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
272079 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272076 +++$+++ 272078 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.207859220E09 +++$+++ I fail to see what's wrong with [http:\/\/www.census.gov\/popest\/cities\/tables\/SUB-EST2006-01.csv this one].  The source you present has a 2000 Census and a 2003 estimate, why not go with the 2006 Census estimate?  Also, I've fixed the citation format.-- +++$+++ :::I fail to see what's wrong with [http://www.census.gov/popest/cities/tables/SUB-EST2006-01.csv this one].  The source you present has a 2000 Census and a 2003 estimate, why not go with the 2006 Census estimate?  Also, I've fixed the citation format.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 13:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
272080 +++$+++ Canyouhearmenow +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272076 +++$+++ 272076 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.207859460E09 +++$+++ Lol I am sorry I was just coming back to change my link. I do think the 2006 is the best one. I changed it on the talk page. If you click, I have changed it on yours as well. I am sorry for my haste in linkage!  +++$+++ :Lol I am sorry I was just coming back to change my link. I do think the 2006 is the best one. I changed it on the talk page. If you click, I have changed it on yours as well. I am sorry for my haste in linkage! [[User:Canyouhearmenow|Canyouhearmenow]] 13:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

534221 +++$+++ RelentlessRouge +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-20 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.150793820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:RelentlessRouge|RelentlessRouge]] 01:57, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
534222 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534221 +++$+++ 534221 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.150794180E09 +++$+++ Replied on User's talk page.  +++$+++ :Replied on User's talk page. [[User:DoomsDay349|DoomsDay349]] 02:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
534223 +++$+++ RelentlessRouge +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534221 +++$+++ 534222 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.150794300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:RelentlessRouge|RelentlessRouge]] 02:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
534224 +++$+++ RelentlessRouge +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534221 +++$+++ 534223 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.150794660E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:RelentlessRouge|RelentlessRouge]] 02:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
534225 +++$+++ RelentlessRouge +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534221 +++$+++ 534224 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.150794960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::[[User:RelentlessRouge|RelentlessRouge]] 02:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

9937 +++$+++ Communicat +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9937 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-09 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.289332080E09 +++$+++ Some time back, you observed casually that a pic of Vorster which I'd uploaded as a historical image had earlier been used without creditation by a certain anti-apartheid organisation. Edward321 has repeatedly cited you as the source of copyright theft allegations which he's been repeating at various forums. I have posted on his talk page a warning to stop making baseless claims, and I've also given him an explanation as to why the image was not credited to Stan Winer when and where it was published by the organisation in question. The photographer has explained to me via email correspondence that the image was circulated and published by various international activist organisations at a time when those organisations were considered subversive by the apartheid fascists. For that reason, those organisations were officially banned in South Africa, where the photographer\/copyright owner was based at the time. Proven links to a banned organisation would have rendered the photographer\/copyright holder liable to arrest and prosecution under the \"security\" and censorship laws of the time. For that reason the image was not openly credited. I hope this clarifies the record. Thanks & Regards,  +++$+++ Some time back, you observed casually that a pic of Vorster which I'd uploaded as a historical image had earlier been used without creditation by a certain anti-apartheid organisation. Edward321 has repeatedly cited you as the source of copyright theft allegations which he's been repeating at various forums. I have posted on his talk page a warning to stop making baseless claims, and I've also given him an explanation as to why the image was not credited to Stan Winer when and where it was published by the organisation in question. The photographer has explained to me via email correspondence that the image was circulated and published by various international activist organisations at a time when those organisations were considered subversive by the apartheid fascists. For that reason, those organisations were officially banned in South Africa, where the photographer/copyright owner was based at the time. Proven links to a banned organisation would have rendered the photographer/copyright holder liable to arrest and prosecution under the "security" and censorship laws of the time. For that reason the image was not openly credited. I hope this clarifies the record. Thanks & Regards, [[User:Communicat|Communicat]] ([[User talk:Communicat|talk]]) 11:48, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
9938 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9937 +++$+++ 9937 +++$+++ 2010-11-09 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.289332380E09 +++$+++ When did he last repeat these allegations? --  +++$+++ :When did he last repeat these allegations? -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 11:53, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

9939 +++$+++ MyMoloboaccount +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9939 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-14 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.289792460E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 19:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
9940 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9939 +++$+++ 9939 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.289795280E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I bet Dr. ''Nordbruch'' is a supporter of [[Nordicism|''Nordicist'']] theories, just like [[Carl O. Nordling|Carl O. ''Nordling'']] seems to be. Makes you wonder why he chose the [[Southern hemisphere|''Southern'' hemisphere]]. --  +++$+++ :Yeah, I bet Dr. ''Nordbruch'' is a supporter of [[Nordicism|''Nordicist'']] theories, just like [[Carl O. Nordling|Carl O. ''Nordling'']] seems to be. Makes you wonder why he chose the [[Southern hemisphere|''Southern'' hemisphere]]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 20:28, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

272084 +++$+++ Raime +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-27 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.209293100E09 +++$+++ I expressed my concerns at [[Talk:Worcester (disambiguation)]], but am reluctant to begin another discussion or requested move at [[Talk:Worcester]]. The last move request turned into such a petty \"my Worcester is better than yours because...\" argument, and the last thing anyone wants to see is a repeat of that. But do you think another move request would be a good idea? 15,000 readers should not be redirected to the wrong article, even if there is a dab link in a hatnote present there. The current situation is simply unacceptable; this is a primary example of why disambiguation pages exist in the first place on Wikipedia; there is obviously no primary topic. What do you think? Cheers,  +++$+++ I expressed my concerns at [[Talk:Worcester (disambiguation)]], but am reluctant to begin another discussion or requested move at [[Talk:Worcester]]. The last move request turned into such a petty "my Worcester is better than yours because..." argument, and the last thing anyone wants to see is a repeat of that. But do you think another move request would be a good idea? 15,000 readers should not be redirected to the wrong article, even if there is a dab link in a hatnote present there. The current situation is simply unacceptable; this is a primary example of why disambiguation pages exist in the first place on Wikipedia; there is obviously no primary topic. What do you think? Cheers, [[User:Raime|<font color="blue" ><b>Rai</b></font>]]•[[User talk:Raime|<font color="green" ><b><i>me</i></b></font>]] 03:45, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
272085 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272084 +++$+++ 272084 +++$+++ 2008-04-27 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.209341820E09 +++$+++ Let's go for another round with them.-- +++$+++ :Let's go for another round with them.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 17:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

9941 +++$+++ Vecrumba +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9941 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-14 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.289802060E09 +++$+++ Offliner has [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Enforcement#Vecrumba chosen to involve you] by contending I have attacked you. Regrettably I've been forced to respond, I had hoped to let our prior unpleasantries pass without further comment.  +++$+++ Offliner has [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Vecrumba chosen to involve you] by contending I have attacked you. Regrettably I've been forced to respond, I had hoped to let our prior unpleasantries pass without further comment. [[User:Vecrumba|P<small>ЄTЄRS</small> <s>J</s> V<small>ЄСRUМВА</small>]]<small> ►[[User_talk:Vecrumba|TALK]]</small> 22:21, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
9942 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9941 +++$+++ 9941 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.289802300E09 +++$+++ In fact I am just about to post a comment. As I have stated in my draft statement, I harbor no ill feelings against you. However, I am forced to ask for an interaction ban. --  +++$+++ :In fact I am just about to post a comment. As I have stated in my draft statement, I harbor no ill feelings against you. However, I am forced to ask for an interaction ban. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 22:25, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
9943 +++$+++ Vecrumba +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9941 +++$+++ 9942 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.289901420E09 +++$+++ Your request for an interaction ban is rather based on a misinterpetation of the situation and assuming bad faith on my part. Regardless, we have both been provoked into an avoidable conflict as the result of Offliner leveling accusations involving you. Please see the enforcement request regarding my updated response. I trust you will choose to see the situation for what it is as well and act accordingly. I look forward to debating you on the sources.  +++$+++ :: Your request for an interaction ban is rather based on a misinterpetation of the situation and assuming bad faith on my part. Regardless, we have both been provoked into an avoidable conflict as the result of Offliner leveling accusations involving you. Please see the enforcement request regarding my updated response. I trust you will choose to see the situation for what it is as well and act accordingly. I look forward to debating you on the sources. [[User:Vecrumba|P<small>ЄTЄRS</small> <s>J</s> V<small>ЄСRUМВА</small>]]<small> ►[[User_talk:Vecrumba|TALK]]</small> 01:57, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
9944 +++$+++ Vecrumba +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9941 +++$+++ 9943 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.289973240E09 +++$+++ My proposal is a limited time offer. If you chose to join in renouncing Offliner's latest block shopping and enforcement request and acknowledge it for the provocation it is, editors from \"both sides\" (such as others have chosen to perceive them) might well follow.  +++$+++ ::: My proposal is a limited time offer. If you chose to join in renouncing Offliner's latest block shopping and enforcement request and acknowledge it for the provocation it is, editors from "both sides" (such as others have chosen to perceive them) might well follow. [[User:Vecrumba|P<small>ЄTЄRS</small> <s>J</s> V<small>ЄСRUМВА</small>]]<small> ►[[User_talk:Vecrumba|TALK]]</small> 21:54, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
9945 +++$+++ Vecrumba +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9941 +++$+++ 9944 +++$+++ 2010-11-17 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.290037260E09 +++$+++ Should you agree to a recanting of our mutual escalation at Offliner's AE request, that offer is still open, however I regret that you've exhausted my willingness to take unilateral action to defuse the AE.  +++$+++ :::: Should you agree to a recanting of our mutual escalation at Offliner's AE request, that offer is still open, however I regret that you've exhausted my willingness to take unilateral action to defuse the AE. [[User:Vecrumba|P<small>ЄTЄRS</small> <s>J</s> V<small>ЄСRUМВА</small>]]<small> ►[[User_talk:Vecrumba|TALK]]</small> 15:41, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
9946 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9941 +++$+++ 9945 +++$+++ 2010-11-17 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.290037560E09 +++$+++ I do not think I have escalated anything. As for the stuff below, I had no ill intentions. I thought you too would enjoy the humor. --  +++$+++ :::::I do not think I have escalated anything. As for the stuff below, I had no ill intentions. I thought you too would enjoy the humor. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 15:46, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
9947 +++$+++ Vecrumba +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9941 +++$+++ 9946 +++$+++ 2010-11-17 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.290037800E09 +++$+++ Didn't see yours. If you don't think you've escalated anything, then we'll just have to see where the AE goes.  +++$+++ :::::: Didn't see yours. If you don't think you've escalated anything, then we'll just have to see where the AE goes. [[User:Vecrumba|P<small>ЄTЄRS</small> <s>J</s> V<small>ЄСRUМВА</small>]]<small> ►[[User_talk:Vecrumba|TALK]]</small> 15:50, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

534230 +++$+++ RelentlessRouge +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-27 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.151433060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:RelentlessRouge|RelentlessRouge]] 11:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
534231 +++$+++ RelentlessRouge +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534230 +++$+++ 534230 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.151453400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:RelentlessRouge|RelentlessRouge]] 17:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

525945 +++$+++ Adolphus79 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525945 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-16 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.147767360E09 +++$+++ damn yer fast... LOL -  +++$+++ damn yer fast... LOL - [[User:Adolphus79|Adolphus79]] 01:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
525946 +++$+++ Kusma +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525945 +++$+++ 525945 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.147769340E09 +++$+++ Most seems to be reverted, see [[Special:Contributions\/Jennygrl34]]. The user currently tries to be nice after attacking me. Let's see how this ends. Thank you for fighting vandalism,  +++$+++ :Most seems to be reverted, see [[Special:Contributions/Jennygrl34]]. The user currently tries to be nice after attacking me. Let's see how this ends. Thank you for fighting vandalism, [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 01:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

534232 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-27 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.151458680E09 +++$+++ Geez, what bunch of nonsense. Note that in the second edit in the history the article was [[WP:PROD|prodded]], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Your_Team%21&diff=60582591&oldid=60578643] which was later removed without comment. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Your_Team%21&diff=next&oldid=60600178] When the prod is removed, you need to take the article to [[WP:AFD]]. Include what the user who made the prod wrote, state that it was removed without comment, and add that [[WP:NFT|Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day]]. Also, note that Googling for the names and the game name gives no significant results. --  +++$+++ Geez, what bunch of nonsense. Note that in the second edit in the history the article was [[WP:PROD|prodded]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Your_Team%21&diff=60582591&oldid=60578643] which was later removed without comment. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Your_Team%21&diff=next&oldid=60600178] When the prod is removed, you need to take the article to [[WP:AFD]]. Include what the user who made the prod wrote, state that it was removed without comment, and add that [[WP:NFT|Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day]]. Also, note that Googling for the names and the game name gives no significant results. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 18:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
534233 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534232 +++$+++ 534232 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.151458800E09 +++$+++ Also, note that no article links to it. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Your_Team%21] --  +++$+++ :Also, note that no article links to it. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Your_Team%21] -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 18:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
534234 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534232 +++$+++ 534233 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.151458800E09 +++$+++ Try to be bold and follow the instructions that appear [[WP:AFD#How to list pages for deletion|here]]. I will correct if you make a mistake. --  +++$+++ ::Try to be bold and follow the instructions that appear [[WP:AFD#How to list pages for deletion|here]]. I will correct if you make a mistake. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 18:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
534235 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534232 +++$+++ 534234 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.151461020E09 +++$+++ Good. Some things: 1. When you want to wikilink a user, use the {{tl|user}} template; 2. Note that when sending fan-made articles to deletion you may get those fans to post offensive comments at your page; and 3. If you have doubts about if an article should be deleted, prod it. If the article has already been prod'ed, send it to AFD. --  +++$+++ :::Good. Some things: 1. When you want to wikilink a user, use the {{tl|user}} template; 2. Note that when sending fan-made articles to deletion you may get those fans to post offensive comments at your page; and 3. If you have doubts about if an article should be deleted, prod it. If the article has already been prod'ed, send it to AFD. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 19:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
534236 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534232 +++$+++ 534235 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.151462400E09 +++$+++ Now there will be a discussion for a week or so, depending if the consensus is too big to either delete or keep. People will come, read your argument, check the article, and \"vote\" with '''Delete''' or '''Keep''', sometimes adding modifiers like '''Weak''' or '''Strong''', explaining why they think that way. You should keep both the article and the votation page in your Watchlist, sometimes editors of the article will delete the AFD tag, and you should restore it. Others may ask you questions in the AFD page, you should reply to them. After a week or so an administrator will review the discussion and determine if the article should be deleted. --  +++$+++ ::::Now there will be a discussion for a week or so, depending if the consensus is too big to either delete or keep. People will come, read your argument, check the article, and "vote" with '''Delete''' or '''Keep''', sometimes adding modifiers like '''Weak''' or '''Strong''', explaining why they think that way. You should keep both the article and the votation page in your Watchlist, sometimes editors of the article will delete the AFD tag, and you should restore it. Others may ask you questions in the AFD page, you should reply to them. After a week or so an administrator will review the discussion and determine if the article should be deleted. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 19:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
534237 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534232 +++$+++ 534236 +++$+++ 2006-06-28 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.151480760E09 +++$+++ Seems the article was speedied, that is good, saves a lot of time. One last thing (again): When you send something to AFD, you don't usually \"vote\", that is, you don't put '''Delete''' in your statement, nor \"vote\" after the AFD started, otherwise people will think you are taking the AFD process as a votation, which is not. --  +++$+++ :::::Seems the article was speedied, that is good, saves a lot of time. One last thing (again): When you send something to AFD, you don't usually "vote", that is, you don't put '''Delete''' in your statement, nor "vote" after the AFD started, otherwise people will think you are taking the AFD process as a votation, which is not. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 00:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

569636 +++$+++ Lxhughes +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569636 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-20 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.169360400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the information on getting started. I was wondering what will happen to my new \"Kristen McMenamy\" entry? Does this have to be approved by an administrator? How do I access the \"edit\" again? regards,  +++$+++ Thanks for the information on getting started. I was wondering what will happen to my new "Kristen McMenamy" entry? Does this have to be approved by an administrator? How do I access the "edit" again? regards, [[User:Lxhughes|Lxhughes]] 22:20, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
569637 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569636 +++$+++ 569636 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.169361540E09 +++$+++ I'll dig it out and put it on a user sub-page for you to edit.  It doesn't have to be pre-approved by an administrator, biographies have to be notable according to [[:WP:BIO]].  +++$+++ :I'll dig it out and put it on a user sub-page for you to edit.  It doesn't have to be pre-approved by an administrator, biographies have to be notable according to [[:WP:BIO]]. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
569638 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569636 +++$+++ 569636 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.169362140E09 +++$+++ [[:User:Lxhughes\/sandbox]] - this is your new sandbox. You can edit articles here without interference before you publish them.  Regards,  +++$+++ :[[:User:Lxhughes/sandbox]] - this is your new sandbox. You can edit articles here without interference before you publish them.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

272091 +++$+++ RFBailey +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-06 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.210064400E09 +++$+++ When debates turn into two sides throwing incivility accusations at each other, then it's time to keep a few paces back, which is what I'm doing now.  -- +++$+++ When debates turn into two sides throwing incivility accusations at each other, then it's time to keep a few paces back, which is what I'm doing now.  --[[User:RFBailey|RFBailey]] ([[User talk:RFBailey|talk]]) 02:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
272092 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272091 +++$+++ 272091 +++$+++ 2008-05-06 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.210065900E09 +++$+++ But you must be able to see where I'm coming from.  I wasn't trying to \"twist\" anything.  I thought he misinterpretted the proposition.  What I spent more time doing than arguing for what he meant was clarifying the terms of the move, so that he himself could respond.-- +++$+++ :But you must be able to see where I'm coming from.  I wasn't trying to "twist" anything.  I thought he misinterpretted the proposition.  What I spent more time doing than arguing for what he meant was clarifying the terms of the move, so that he himself could respond.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 02:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
272093 +++$+++ RFBailey +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272091 +++$+++ 272092 +++$+++ 2008-05-06 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.210072860E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you should just have asked for them to clarify what they were talking about, rather than saying \"''I think you mean \"support\"''\", when it really wasn't clear what they were saying one way or the other.  Then you would have avoided any claims of misrepresenting or manipulating their view.  -- +++$+++ ::Perhaps you should just have asked for them to clarify what they were talking about, rather than saying "''I think you mean "support"''", when it really wasn't clear what they were saying one way or the other.  Then you would have avoided any claims of misrepresenting or manipulating their view.  --[[User:RFBailey|RFBailey]] ([[User talk:RFBailey|talk]]) 04:21, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
272094 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272091 +++$+++ 272093 +++$+++ 2008-05-06 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.210123080E09 +++$+++ I guess you're right.  Doesn't seem to matter now.  He's off on a poorly-written tirade that's not helping anyone, and that's far more his doing than mine.-- +++$+++ :::I guess you're right.  Doesn't seem to matter now.  He's off on a poorly-written tirade that's not helping anyone, and that's far more his doing than mine.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 18:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

9948 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9948 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.289902500E09 +++$+++ Did you happen to know any of these people? --  +++$+++ Did you happen to know any of these people? -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 02:15, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
9949 +++$+++ Vecrumba +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9948 +++$+++ 9948 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.289908140E09 +++$+++ Don't know anyone who would be among the alleged deleted. Ask me again about the Justice Department's OSI when my topic ban expires.  +++$+++ : Don't know anyone who would be among the alleged deleted. Ask me again about the Justice Department's OSI when my topic ban expires. [[User:Vecrumba|P<small>ЄTЄRS</small> <s>J</s> V<small>ЄСRUМВА</small>]]<small> ►[[User_talk:Vecrumba|TALK]]</small> 03:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

534240 +++$+++ RelentlessRouge +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-25 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.153816260E09 +++$+++ [[User:RelentlessRouge|<font color=\"red\">R<\/font>]]'''''[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]]''''' +++$+++ [[User:RelentlessRouge|<font color="red">R</font>]]'''''[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]'''''[[user:RelentlessRouge|<font color="red">lentless</font>]][[User talk:RelentlessRouge|<font color="blue">Rouge</font>]] 01:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
534241 +++$+++ RelentlessRouge +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534240 +++$+++ 534240 +++$+++ 2006-07-25 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.153816500E09 +++$+++ [[User:RelentlessRouge|<font color=\"red\">R<\/font>]]'''''[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]]''''' +++$+++ :[[User:RelentlessRouge|<font color="red">R</font>]]'''''[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]'''''[[user:RelentlessRouge|<font color="red">lentless</font>]][[User talk:RelentlessRouge|<font color="blue">Rouge</font>]] 01:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

9955 +++$+++ Communicat +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-29 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.291083540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Communicat|Communicat]] ([[User talk:Communicat|talk]]) 18:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
9956 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9955 +++$+++ 9955 +++$+++ 2010-11-29 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.291083600E09 +++$+++ I will have a look \u2013 but not today. --  +++$+++ :I will have a look – but not today. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 18:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
9957 +++$+++ The Four Deuces +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9955 +++$+++ 9956 +++$+++ 2010-11-30 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.291120680E09 +++$+++ Under Digwuren one is not allowed to call other editors \"Nazis\" - Stalinist is acceptable, and Martintg is trying to argue that fascist is the same as Nazi.   +++$+++ ::Under Digwuren one is not allowed to call other editors "Nazis" - Stalinist is acceptable, and Martintg is trying to argue that fascist is the same as Nazi.  [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 04:38, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

534245 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-13 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.155473280E09 +++$+++ You should not just slap a completely new article into another. As you finish sections here, put them there. Otherwise, people who had been working in the article would just someday find all their contributions gone, and since you will just copy a version, there will be no change history in the main article. --  +++$+++ You should not just slap a completely new article into another. As you finish sections here, put them there. Otherwise, people who had been working in the article would just someday find all their contributions gone, and since you will just copy a version, there will be no change history in the main article. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 05:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
534246 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534245 +++$+++ 534245 +++$+++ 2006-08-14 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.155544920E09 +++$+++ I will see if I can check that later. I am right now focusing on an article about a MUD, and hopefully finishing reading the Annotated Chronicles. I add notes from time to time when I find something very interesting, but for now I am trying to limit my work on DL articles to prevent burning myself out. --  +++$+++ :I will see if I can check that later. I am right now focusing on an article about a MUD, and hopefully finishing reading the Annotated Chronicles. I add notes from time to time when I find something very interesting, but for now I am trying to limit my work on DL articles to prevent burning myself out. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 01:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

272102 +++$+++ Rracecarr +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-11 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.213235220E09 +++$+++ Thanks a bunch.   +++$+++ Thanks a bunch.  [[User:Rracecarr|Rracecarr]] ([[User talk:Rracecarr|talk]]) 18:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
272103 +++$+++ Electrical Experiment +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272102 +++$+++ 272102 +++$+++ 2008-06-19 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.213865640E09 +++$+++ I  fixed it. <span style=\"font-family:Gill Sans MT\">[[User talk:Electrical Experiment|<span style=\"color:gold;background:Black\">'''Electrical'''<\/span>]]<sup> +++$+++ :I  fixed it. <span style="font-family:Gill Sans MT">[[User talk:Electrical Experiment|<span style="color:gold;background:Black">'''Electrical'''</span>]]<sup>[[User:Electrical Experiment/Vand|<span style="color:gold;background:Black">Vandilize Me</span></sup>]]</span> 01:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
272104 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272102 +++$+++ 272103 +++$+++ 2008-06-19 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.213866600E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I can be somewhat derelict on these things.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks.  I can be somewhat derelict on these things.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 02:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

9960 +++$+++ 144.92.184.170 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-02 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.291335300E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you added a citation needed tag for the claim that Palinchsky was executed by the Soviets. Isn't the book the article is about enough of a citation? [[Special:Contributions\/144.92.184.170|144.92.184.170]] ( +++$+++ I noticed that you added a citation needed tag for the claim that Palinchsky was executed by the Soviets. Isn't the book the article is about enough of a citation? [[Special:Contributions/144.92.184.170|144.92.184.170]] ([[User talk:144.92.184.170|talk]]) 16:15, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
9961 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9960 +++$+++ 9960 +++$+++ 2010-12-02 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.291361040E09 +++$+++ No, \"executed\" in this context means [[Extrajudicial punishment in the Soviet Union]]. If he was tried, you need to mention that. Extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof. The book itself is not sufficient for this part of Palinchsky's biography, or if it is used, we need far more detail and page numbers. --  +++$+++ :No, "executed" in this context means [[Extrajudicial punishment in the Soviet Union]]. If he was tried, you need to mention that. Extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof. The book itself is not sufficient for this part of Palinchsky's biography, or if it is used, we need far more detail and page numbers. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 23:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

263804 +++$+++ Cobaltbluetony +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263804 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-18 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.158621840E09 +++$+++ Article recreated after g1 speedy.  By editor who has had a habit of recreating repeatedly.  Recommend watching this article\/editor and protecting the article title if persistent recreations continue. -  +++$+++ Article recreated after g1 speedy.  By editor who has had a habit of recreating repeatedly.  Recommend watching this article/editor and protecting the article title if persistent recreations continue. - [[User:Cobaltbluetony|CobaltBlueTony]] 16:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
263805 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263804 +++$+++ 263804 +++$+++ 2006-09-19 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.158698700E09 +++$+++ It seems to me that the link is there to promote the forum, which is should be avoided per [[Wikipedia:External links]]. Please don't add it again. Thanks.  +++$+++ :It seems to me that the link is there to promote the forum, which is should be avoided per [[Wikipedia:External links]]. Please don't add it again. Thanks. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 13:45, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

9962 +++$+++ Volunteer Marek +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-03 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.291381980E09 +++$+++ Please remove or strike through the following statement ''Unfortunately he failed to give credit to the creator and copyright owner as our license requires.'' that you made here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Communist_terrorism_(3rd_nomination)] as it is a very serious accusation and since you have made it without any support or foundation, it violates numerous Wikipedia policies. +++$+++ Please remove or strike through the following statement ''Unfortunately he failed to give credit to the creator and copyright owner as our license requires.'' that you made here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Communist_terrorism_(3rd_nomination)] as it is a very serious accusation and since you have made it without any support or foundation, it violates numerous Wikipedia policies.[[User:Volunteer Marek| Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 05:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
9963 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9962 +++$+++ 9962 +++$+++ 2010-12-03 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.291382820E09 +++$+++ I will redact it with an explanation \u2013 after you take the following step: Record your move with two {{tl|Copied}} tags on [[Talk:Treaties of Bautzen and Merseburg]] in a similar manner as I have done on [[Talk:Communist terrorism]]. Note however, that this is not the only part of your omission. You should have also given credit to the author \/ article when you first started [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Peace_of_Bautzen&diff=383711663&oldid=383711385 moving] the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Treaty_of_Merseburg&diff=383733172&oldid=383461157 content]. I believe your failure to give credit to the copyright owner was the primary reason why your conflict with [[User:Sk\xe4pper\xf6d]] escalated. --  +++$+++ :I will redact it with an explanation – after you take the following step: Record your move with two {{tl|Copied}} tags on [[Talk:Treaties of Bautzen and Merseburg]] in a similar manner as I have done on [[Talk:Communist terrorism]]. Note however, that this is not the only part of your omission. You should have also given credit to the author / article when you first started [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peace_of_Bautzen&diff=383711663&oldid=383711385 moving] the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Treaty_of_Merseburg&diff=383733172&oldid=383461157 content]. I believe your failure to give credit to the copyright owner was the primary reason why your conflict with [[User:Skäpperöd]] escalated. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 05:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
9964 +++$+++ Volunteer Marek +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9962 +++$+++ 9963 +++$+++ 2010-12-03 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.291387320E09 +++$+++ Either you remove the statement or you don't. +++$+++ ::Either you remove the statement or you don't.[[User:Volunteer Marek| Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 06:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
9965 +++$+++ Volunteer Marek +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9962 +++$+++ 9963 +++$+++ 2010-12-03 07:38:00 +++$+++ 1.291390680E09 +++$+++ Thanks, it's appreciated. +++$+++ ::Thanks, it's appreciated.[[User:Volunteer Marek| Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 07:38, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

534252 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534252 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-19 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.158654780E09 +++$+++ That was an example to clarify that, while US laws are strict, Wikipedia uses stricter rules to be sure to fall within US laws. --  +++$+++ That was an example to clarify that, while US laws are strict, Wikipedia uses stricter rules to be sure to fall within US laws. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 01:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
534253 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534252 +++$+++ 534252 +++$+++ 2006-09-19 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.158722760E09 +++$+++ No, there are people from all ages contributing to Wikipedia. We even have bureaucrats that are under that age. That was an extreme example intended to explain that any restriction Wikipedia imposes will usually be tighter than US law. You don't need to be of a determined age to contribute, so don't worry. --  +++$+++ :No, there are people from all ages contributing to Wikipedia. We even have bureaucrats that are under that age. That was an extreme example intended to explain that any restriction Wikipedia imposes will usually be tighter than US law. You don't need to be of a determined age to contribute, so don't worry. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 20:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

272109 +++$+++ NJGW +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272109 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-03 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.215070560E09 +++$+++ There's [[Talk:Peak_oil#Breaking_up_the_lead|talk of revamping]] the [[Peak oil]] lead, and I thought you might be interested in commenting.   +++$+++ There's [[Talk:Peak_oil#Breaking_up_the_lead|talk of revamping]] the [[Peak oil]] lead, and I thought you might be interested in commenting.  [[User:NJGW|NJGW]] ([[User talk:NJGW|talk]]) 00:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
272110 +++$+++ Arturoramos +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272109 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-07 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.215475380E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ ::-- [[User:Arturoramos|Arturoramos]] ([[User talk:Arturoramos|talk]]) 17:03, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
272111 +++$+++ Arturoramos +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272109 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-07 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.215492960E09 +++$+++ ---  +++$+++ :::--- [[User:Arturoramos|Arturoramos]] ([[User talk:Arturoramos|talk]]) 21:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
272112 +++$+++ Arturoramos +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272109 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-07 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.215493800E09 +++$+++ ---  +++$+++ :::: --- [[User:Arturoramos|Arturoramos]] ([[User talk:Arturoramos|talk]]) 22:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
272113 +++$+++ Arturoramos +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272109 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-07 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.215494640E09 +++$+++ ---  +++$+++ ::::: --- [[User:Arturoramos|Arturoramos]] ([[User talk:Arturoramos|talk]]) 22:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
272114 +++$+++ Arturoramos +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272109 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-07 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.215500340E09 +++$+++ ---  +++$+++ :::::: --- [[User:Arturoramos|Arturoramos]] ([[User talk:Arturoramos|talk]]) 23:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

9966 +++$+++ Volunteer Marek +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9966 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-05 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.291556160E09 +++$+++ Please use your sandbox, or your userspace to store links which you may feel are important\/relevant\/significant\/of interest to you for some reason, rather than randomly (your words) putting them on article pages as you did here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Vinnytsia_massacre&diff=prev&oldid=400621762]. Thanks. +++$+++ Please use your sandbox, or your userspace to store links which you may feel are important/relevant/significant/of interest to you for some reason, rather than randomly (your words) putting them on article pages as you did here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vinnytsia_massacre&diff=prev&oldid=400621762]. Thanks.[[User:Volunteer Marek| Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 05:36, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
9967 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9966 +++$+++ 9966 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.291556820E09 +++$+++ Just read the source. --  +++$+++ :Just read the source. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 05:47, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
9968 +++$+++ Volunteer Marek +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9966 +++$+++ 9967 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.291563000E09 +++$+++ Which one are you referring to? The Stormfront website you posted? Sorry, but I have no interest in even clicking on that kind of trash. And you shouldn't have an interest in posting it on Wikipedia. +++$+++ ::Which one are you referring to? The Stormfront website you posted? Sorry, but I have no interest in even clicking on that kind of trash. And you shouldn't have an interest in posting it on Wikipedia.[[User:Volunteer Marek| Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 07:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
9969 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9966 +++$+++ 9968 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.291565160E09 +++$+++ Naturally the one in the link you provided. It contains a French translation of the original 1943 report, or parts of it. I have not been able to find it in English, except for the summary on anti-communist sites. --  +++$+++ :::Naturally the one in the link you provided. It contains a French translation of the original 1943 report, or parts of it. I have not been able to find it in English, except for the summary on anti-communist sites. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 08:06, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
9970 +++$+++ Volunteer Marek +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9966 +++$+++ 9969 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.291575240E09 +++$+++ If there is some reason for that link to be there, then explain it on talk and\/or include it in the article (provided it's RS and all that). Otherwise, don't use talk pages to store 'random links'. +++$+++ ::::If there is some reason for that link to be there, then explain it on talk and/or include it in the article (provided it's RS and all that). Otherwise, don't use talk pages to store 'random links'.[[User:Volunteer Marek| Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 10:54, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
9971 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9966 +++$+++ 9966 +++$+++ 2010-12-06 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.291640040E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?ei=QGb8TIvrOIf0sgbwuoGUBA&ct=result&id=wx1nAAAAMAAJ&dq=Peaceful+Coexistence%3A+An+Analysis+of+Soviet+Foreign+Policy&q=%22I.+G.+Kebin%22#search_anchor bookmark]. --  +++$+++ * [http://books.google.com/books?ei=QGb8TIvrOIf0sgbwuoGUBA&ct=result&id=wx1nAAAAMAAJ&dq=Peaceful+Coexistence%3A+An+Analysis+of+Soviet+Foreign+Policy&q=%22I.+G.+Kebin%22#search_anchor bookmark]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 04:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

272115 +++$+++ CIreland +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272115 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-08 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.215516240E09 +++$+++ May I suggest that if the other fellow is unresponsive to requests for discussion that you ask for a [[WP:3O|third opinion]] or ask at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina]] for assistance. You could also consider an article [[WP:RFC|request for comment]] if things become really intractable. Edit warring when the other user's additions appear in good faith is an unwise idea and, in all honesty, if [[User:Gonzo fan2007]] hadn't protected the page I would have blocked all participants, yourself included.  +++$+++ May I suggest that if the other fellow is unresponsive to requests for discussion that you ask for a [[WP:3O|third opinion]] or ask at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina]] for assistance. You could also consider an article [[WP:RFC|request for comment]] if things become really intractable. Edit warring when the other user's additions appear in good faith is an unwise idea and, in all honesty, if [[User:Gonzo fan2007]] hadn't protected the page I would have blocked all participants, yourself included. [[User:CIreland|CIreland]] ([[User talk:CIreland|talk]]) 04:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
272116 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272115 +++$+++ 272115 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.215516360E09 +++$+++ Every edit I've made has included a request to discuss the addition on the talk page.  This user continues the acts of previous sock IP address, so I can hardly call it the appearance of good faith.  I started the topic on the talk page, and each subsequent reversion referenced it. User has taken no good faith actions, and also edit wars on [[Raleigh, North Carolina]] with a long history.-- +++$+++ :Every edit I've made has included a request to discuss the addition on the talk page.  This user continues the acts of previous sock IP address, so I can hardly call it the appearance of good faith.  I started the topic on the talk page, and each subsequent reversion referenced it. User has taken no good faith actions, and also edit wars on [[Raleigh, North Carolina]] with a long history.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 04:26, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
272117 +++$+++ CIreland +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272115 +++$+++ 272116 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.215516840E09 +++$+++ Well, look at it this way: Suppose you ask for comments\/help at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina]] and a couple of editors come along and offer their opinions. Suppose, further, that they agree with you, that the material should not be included. If the IP remains taciturn then you can point to a talk page consensus, request unprotection from [[User:Gonzo fan2007]] and bring the article in line with consensus. Of course, there's no guarantee that others won't agree with the inclusion of the material or suggest a compromise between the extremes of verbatim addition and removal, but that's just a part of the process of collaborative editing.  +++$+++ ::Well, look at it this way: Suppose you ask for comments/help at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina]] and a couple of editors come along and offer their opinions. Suppose, further, that they agree with you, that the material should not be included. If the IP remains taciturn then you can point to a talk page consensus, request unprotection from [[User:Gonzo fan2007]] and bring the article in line with consensus. Of course, there's no guarantee that others won't agree with the inclusion of the material or suggest a compromise between the extremes of verbatim addition and removal, but that's just a part of the process of collaborative editing. [[User:CIreland|CIreland]] ([[User talk:CIreland|talk]]) 04:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
272118 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272115 +++$+++ 272117 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.215516960E09 +++$+++ I'm fine with what any reasoning, communicative person agrees to on the page.-- +++$+++ :::I'm fine with what any reasoning, communicative person agrees to on the page.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 04:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

272120 +++$+++ Eric +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272120 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-24 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.216953540E09 +++$+++ Hello Loodog- I saw your replacement of the \"the Cape\" bit in the intro to the [[Cape Cod]] article. Just wanted to let you know that I didn't delete that without thinking about it. I think it's fine to mention the nickname somewhere, but I don't think it belongs in the opening sentence of the article. I'd also change the ''most'' in \"most New Englanders\" to ''many,'' since on several occasions I have mentioned \"the Cape\" to people in MA and ME and had them say back to me \"Cape Ann?\" or \"Cape Elizabeth?\". I've called it the Cape my whole life, but on considering this a few minutes ago, I found this intro too Cape(Cod)-centric. A quick general wp search on 'cape' will show how many capes we have articles about. - +++$+++ Hello Loodog- I saw your replacement of the "the Cape" bit in the intro to the [[Cape Cod]] article. Just wanted to let you know that I didn't delete that without thinking about it. I think it's fine to mention the nickname somewhere, but I don't think it belongs in the opening sentence of the article. I'd also change the ''most'' in "most New Englanders" to ''many,'' since on several occasions I have mentioned "the Cape" to people in MA and ME and had them say back to me "Cape Ann?" or "Cape Elizabeth?". I've called it the Cape my whole life, but on considering this a few minutes ago, I found this intro too Cape(Cod)-centric. A quick general wp search on 'cape' will show how many capes we have articles about. -[[User:Eric|Eric]] [[User talk:Eric|<sup>talk</sup>]] 19:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
272121 +++$+++ Eric +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272120 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-24 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.216957980E09 +++$+++ Hi- I'm not sure where you're going with the hit counts, but thanks for showing me the hit counter page. In any case, my main point was regarding where the nickname info should appear in the article. - +++$+++ ::Hi- I'm not sure where you're going with the hit counts, but thanks for showing me the hit counter page. In any case, my main point was regarding where the nickname info should appear in the article. -[[User:Eric|Eric]] [[User talk:Eric|<sup>talk</sup>]] 20:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
272122 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272120 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-24 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.216958460E09 +++$+++ The point of including a nickname in an opening sentence is to either (1) assure the reader he's in the right place or (2) let the reader know common ways in language to reference the topic.  Given that, I think keeping \"The Cape\" in the opening sentence would improve the article.-- +++$+++ :::The point of including a nickname in an opening sentence is to either (1) assure the reader he's in the right place or (2) let the reader know common ways in language to reference the topic.  Given that, I think keeping "The Cape" in the opening sentence would improve the article.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 21:01, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
272123 +++$+++ Eric +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272120 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-25 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.216981740E09 +++$+++ I'd be surprised if 1) someone looking for the Cape Cod article would doubt he was in the right place when the article is titled \"Cape Cod\", and 2) that someone researching [[Cape Horn]] (19,149 hits in March 2008) would agree that Cape Cod is the one cape on the English Wikipedia that should be referred to as \"the Cape\" in \"common language.\" - +++$+++ ::::I'd be surprised if 1) someone looking for the Cape Cod article would doubt he was in the right place when the article is titled "Cape Cod", and 2) that someone researching [[Cape Horn]] (19,149 hits in March 2008) would agree that Cape Cod is the one cape on the English Wikipedia that should be referred to as "the Cape" in "common language." -[[User:Eric|Eric]] [[User talk:Eric|<sup>talk</sup>]] 03:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
272124 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272120 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-25 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.216982400E09 +++$+++ (1) Someone might hear his fellow Bostonian refer to \"The Cape\", for example., and (2) I'd expect New Englanders to have a heavy bias toward Cape Cod and away from South America or [[Cape of Good Hope|South Africa]] when using the phrase.-- +++$+++ :::::(1) Someone might hear his fellow Bostonian refer to "The Cape", for example., and (2) I'd expect New Englanders to have a heavy bias toward Cape Cod and away from South America or [[Cape of Good Hope|South Africa]] when using the phrase.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 03:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
272125 +++$+++ Eric +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272120 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-25 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.216982640E09 +++$+++ Is the English Wikipedia focused on New Englanders? - +++$+++ ::::::Is the English Wikipedia focused on New Englanders? -[[User:Eric|Eric]] [[User talk:Eric|<sup>talk</sup>]] 03:44, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
272126 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272120 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-25 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.216982940E09 +++$+++ No, but recall when I reinserted \"The Cape\", I qualified it with \"Most New Englanders\".  I have no contentions about Cape Cod being the most popular cape in the world.  I'm not asking to rename the article or redirect \"[[The Cape]]\", but to include a notable nickname locals would use.-- +++$+++ :::::::No, but recall when I reinserted "The Cape", I qualified it with "Most New Englanders".  I have no contentions about Cape Cod being the most popular cape in the world.  I'm not asking to rename the article or redirect "[[The Cape]]", but to include a notable nickname locals would use.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 03:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

613332 +++$+++ SaraNoon +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-07 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.220839380E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Primary_Secondary_and_Tertiary_Sources PSTS Policy & Guidelines].-- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Primary_Secondary_and_Tertiary_Sources PSTS Policy & Guidelines].--[[User:SaraNoon|SaraNoon]] ([[User talk:SaraNoon|talk]]) 19:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
613333 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613332 +++$+++ 613332 +++$+++ 2008-09-07 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.220844600E09 +++$+++ Thanks, will try to find time to look into it. . .  +++$+++ :Thanks, will try to find time to look into it. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

9979 +++$+++ PCPP +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-04 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.294163460E09 +++$+++ Hi, I do not understand why these material [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Politburo_Standing_Committee_of_the_Communist_Party_of_China&diff=405680487&oldid=405661350] is included in the [[Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China|CCP Politburo]] article. The Wikileaks documents did not come from the PRC government, but speculation from US diplomats. Placing it there might be seen as a violation of [[WP:UNDUE]]. I believe that a better place for these material would be [[Operation Aurora]] or any other article on Chinese hackings.-- +++$+++ Hi, I do not understand why these material [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Politburo_Standing_Committee_of_the_Communist_Party_of_China&diff=405680487&oldid=405661350] is included in the [[Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China|CCP Politburo]] article. The Wikileaks documents did not come from the PRC government, but speculation from US diplomats. Placing it there might be seen as a violation of [[WP:UNDUE]]. I believe that a better place for these material would be [[Operation Aurora]] or any other article on Chinese hackings.--[[User:PCPP|PCPP]] ([[User talk:PCPP|talk]]) 09:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
9980 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9979 +++$+++ 9979 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.294199520E09 +++$+++ I fully agree. In fact the allegations do not seem to be about the [[Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China|Standing Committee]], but about the Politburo in general. Other more appropriate articles would be [[17th Politburo of the Communist Party of China]] or [[Politburo of the Communist Party of China]]. --  +++$+++ :I fully agree. In fact the allegations do not seem to be about the [[Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China|Standing Committee]], but about the Politburo in general. Other more appropriate articles would be [[17th Politburo of the Communist Party of China]] or [[Politburo of the Communist Party of China]]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 19:52, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

534269 +++$+++ Moeface +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-01 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.159762080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Moeface|- Moe]] 21:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
534270 +++$+++ Moeface +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534269 +++$+++ 534269 +++$+++ 2006-10-02 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.159794660E09 +++$+++ Nothing specific, I just fixed up articles that needed fixing, adding what little knowledge I possessed. +++$+++ :Nothing specific, I just fixed up articles that needed fixing, adding what little knowledge I possessed.[[User:Moeface|- Moe]] 06:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

534271 +++$+++ AntiVandalBot +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-04 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.160022480E09 +++$+++ Your recent edit to [[:Category:Entertainment lists]] ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Category%3AEntertainment_lists&diff=79526621&oldid=78400434 diff]) was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair [[Wikipedia:vandalism|vandalism]] to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies \u2013 if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. '''[[User:AntiVandalBot\/FAQ|Click here]]''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. \/\/  +++$+++ Your recent edit to [[:Category:Entertainment lists]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3AEntertainment_lists&diff=79526621&oldid=78400434 diff]) was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair [[Wikipedia:vandalism|vandalism]] to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. '''[[User:AntiVandalBot/FAQ|Click here]]''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. // [[User:AntiVandalBot|AntiVandalBot]] 21:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
534272 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534271 +++$+++ 534271 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.160022660E09 +++$+++ ...Sigh...I was reverted again, eh?  OK, again, this is for the record.  The edit was done '''in good faith''' and was not vandalism.  I'll explain.  The intro on that Category appeared as either out of place or an advertisement. I removed it, and was reverted.  I am currently inquiring about it, and will have this cleared up soon. <font color=\"orange\">[[User:DoomsDay349|Dooms]]<\/font><font color=\"purple\">[[User talk:DoomsDay349|Day34]]<\/font><font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :...Sigh...I was reverted again, eh?  OK, again, this is for the record.  The edit was done '''in good faith''' and was not vandalism.  I'll explain.  The intro on that Category appeared as either out of place or an advertisement. I removed it, and was reverted.  I am currently inquiring about it, and will have this cleared up soon. <font color="orange">[[User:DoomsDay349|Dooms]]</font><font color="purple">[[User talk:DoomsDay349|Day34]]</font><font color="green">[[User:DoomsDay349/Esperanza|9]]</font> 21:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

585178 +++$+++ AngelOfSadness +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585178 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-17 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.205799900E09 +++$+++ For the user talkpage revert. I really appreciated it considering the vandal was a mighty handful. Strange it seems he [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Pope_Ben_Lister&diff=prev&oldid=198893746 pleaded not to be blocked] and yet [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:AngelOfSadness&diff=prev&oldid=198894302 continued]. I wish one day I'll find a vandal who keeps their word...if that'll ever happen :). Thanks again  +++$+++ For the user talkpage revert. I really appreciated it considering the vandal was a mighty handful. Strange it seems he [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pope_Ben_Lister&diff=prev&oldid=198893746 pleaded not to be blocked] and yet [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngelOfSadness&diff=prev&oldid=198894302 continued]. I wish one day I'll find a vandal who keeps their word...if that'll ever happen :). Thanks again [[User:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background:#000000 ; color: #30D5C8;"> AngelOfSadness </span>]][[User_talk:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background: #000000; color: #FF69B4;"> talk </span>]] 17:25, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
585179 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585178 +++$+++ 585178 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.205800140E09 +++$+++ You're welcome for the revert, and thank you for the cookie. :) Regarding vandals who say they'll stop their vandalism, almost every time they say that, it's just a cover so they can vandalize more. They'll say \"I'll stop!\", hope you'll turn your back on them, and then they'll return to vandalizing. :) I was beaten to the block though, but at least I got to do the revert. :)  +++$+++ :You're welcome for the revert, and thank you for the cookie. :) Regarding vandals who say they'll stop their vandalism, almost every time they say that, it's just a cover so they can vandalize more. They'll say "I'll stop!", hope you'll turn your back on them, and then they'll return to vandalizing. :) I was beaten to the block though, but at least I got to do the revert. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
585180 +++$+++  +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585178 +++$+++ 585179 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.205801100E09 +++$+++ Foolish vandals don't they know that we ''never'' turn our backs once we know they exist. They may aswell try to see is saying \"Ooh there's an elephant behind you, if you look around know you'll see it\" would work as a distraction. I was actually very surprised when you got beaten to the block as I had one eye on his contribution list (he had removed his name from the [[WP:AIV]] twice and that was well after the final warning) and the other eye on the block log. But you managed to beat me to the revert even though I was refeshing his contrib page every five seconds. :) 17:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ ::Foolish vandals don't they know that we ''never'' turn our backs once we know they exist. They may aswell try to see is saying "Ooh there's an elephant behind you, if you look around know you'll see it" would work as a distraction. I was actually very surprised when you got beaten to the block as I had one eye on his contribution list (he had removed his name from the [[WP:AIV]] twice and that was well after the final warning) and the other eye on the block log. But you managed to beat me to the revert even though I was refeshing his contrib page every five seconds. :) 17:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
585181 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585178 +++$+++ 585180 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.205801520E09 +++$+++ Yes, whenever I spot a vandal, I refresh their contributions page every few seconds as well. :) Regarding being beaten to the block, I think was a little too slow at filling in the block form.  +++$+++ :::Yes, whenever I spot a vandal, I refresh their contributions page every few seconds as well. :) Regarding being beaten to the block, I think was a little too slow at filling in the block form. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:52, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
585182 +++$+++ AngelOfSadness +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585178 +++$+++ 585181 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.205802000E09 +++$+++ I think [[User:Acroterion|Acroterion]] might have seen the dispruption at AIV(a minute before the vandal's final edit), and so blocked him the same minute the vandal left the oh-so-thoughtful message on my talkpage.  +++$+++ ::::I think [[User:Acroterion|Acroterion]] might have seen the dispruption at AIV(a minute before the vandal's final edit), and so blocked him the same minute the vandal left the oh-so-thoughtful message on my talkpage. [[User:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background:#000000 ; color: #30D5C8;"> AngelOfSadness </span>]][[User_talk:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background: #000000; color: #FF69B4;"> talk </span>]] 18:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
585183 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585178 +++$+++ 585182 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.205802360E09 +++$+++ I think so too. :) I don't have AIV on my watchlist, so I wouldn't have noticed the disruption there. However, I do have your user and talk pages on my watchlist, hence why I reverted the vandalism. :)  +++$+++ :::::I think so too. :) I don't have AIV on my watchlist, so I wouldn't have noticed the disruption there. However, I do have your user and talk pages on my watchlist, hence why I reverted the vandalism. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
585184 +++$+++ AngelOfSadness +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585178 +++$+++ 585183 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.205802840E09 +++$+++ Sure I think I have AIV on my watchlist to see the progress of my vandal reports and to keep an eye on other blantant vandals. But yes I have your talkpage and userpage on my watchlist just in case the odd vandal comes along and feels they have to voice their extremely important thoughts :)  +++$+++ ::::::Sure I think I have AIV on my watchlist to see the progress of my vandal reports and to keep an eye on other blantant vandals. But yes I have your talkpage and userpage on my watchlist just in case the odd vandal comes along and feels they have to voice their extremely important thoughts :) [[User:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background:#000000 ; color: #30D5C8;"> AngelOfSadness </span>]][[User_talk:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background: #000000; color: #FF69B4;"> talk </span>]] 18:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
585185 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585178 +++$+++ 585184 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.205803440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help here. :)  +++$+++ :::::::Thanks for the help here. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
585186 +++$+++ AngelOfSadness +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585178 +++$+++ 585185 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.205804100E09 +++$+++ No problemo and thank you. *starts to think we could be here all day thanking each other* :)  +++$+++ ::::::::No problemo and thank you. *starts to think we could be here all day thanking each other* :) [[User:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background:#000000 ; color: #30D5C8;"> AngelOfSadness </span>]][[User_talk:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background: #000000; color: #FF69B4;"> talk </span>]] 18:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
585187 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585178 +++$+++ 585186 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.205804220E09 +++$+++ Only if you want to. :)  +++$+++ :::::::::Only if you want to. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

9985 +++$+++ The Four Deuces +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9985 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-13 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.297659420E09 +++$+++ I recently filed a report on an OP and wondered if with your knowledge of how they work you could provide some input.  Thanks.  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:WikiProject_on_open_proxies\/Unchecked#78.159.105.106]   +++$+++ I recently filed a report on an OP and wondered if with your knowledge of how they work you could provide some input.  Thanks.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_on_open_proxies/Unchecked#78.159.105.106]  [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 20:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
9986 +++$+++ The Four Deuces +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9985 +++$+++ 9985 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.297688160E09 +++$+++ The Ips are now blocked.   +++$+++ :The Ips are now blocked.  [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 04:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

272130 +++$+++ JamesMLane +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-05 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.217987160E09 +++$+++ How does that grab you?  +++$+++ How does that grab you? [[User:JamesMLane|JamesMLane]]<small>&nbsp;[[User_talk:JamesMLane|t]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/JamesMLane|c]]</small> 18:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
272131 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272130 +++$+++ 272130 +++$+++ 2008-08-05 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.217987400E09 +++$+++ The fact that we agreed there's no primary usage for \"New York\" is not my argument; it's a relevant piece of information we've agreed upon.-- +++$+++ :The fact that we agreed there's no primary usage for "New York" is not my argument; it's a relevant piece of information we've agreed upon.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 18:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
272132 +++$+++ JamesMLane +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272130 +++$+++ 272131 +++$+++ 2008-08-05 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.217987640E09 +++$+++ OK, I've edited my comment to point out that if it's a dab page, none of the readers typing \"New York\" will get to a substantive article -- which, by your reasoning, isn't my argument, it's just a relevant piece of information we've agreed on.  I think the poll would be better if set up as I suggested above but I can grudgingly accept this alternative.  +++$+++ ::OK, I've edited my comment to point out that if it's a dab page, none of the readers typing "New York" will get to a substantive article -- which, by your reasoning, isn't my argument, it's just a relevant piece of information we've agreed on.  I think the poll would be better if set up as I suggested above but I can grudgingly accept this alternative. [[User:JamesMLane|JamesMLane]]<small>&nbsp;[[User_talk:JamesMLane|t]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/JamesMLane|c]]</small> 18:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

569643 +++$+++ Pdigrl +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.169592600E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Pdigrl|Pdigrl]] 14:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
569644 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569643 +++$+++ 569643 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.169593020E09 +++$+++ Notable companies are defined as such using the criteria at [[:WP:CORP]]. Regards,  +++$+++ :Notable companies are defined as such using the criteria at [[:WP:CORP]]. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 14:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

9988 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-21 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.298341380E09 +++$+++ Hi Petri, regarding the discussion you started in December about this, I've asked again that it be removed from the spam blacklist. The discussion is [http:\/\/meta.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Spam_blacklist#www.holocaustresearchproject.org here on Meta] if you'd like to comment. Cheers, <font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ Hi Petri, regarding the discussion you started in December about this, I've asked again that it be removed from the spam blacklist. The discussion is [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spam_blacklist#www.holocaustresearchproject.org here on Meta] if you'd like to comment. Cheers, <font color="black">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="gold">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|TALK|]]</font><font color="lime">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|CONTRIBS]]</font></sup></small> 18:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
9989 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9988 +++$+++ 9988 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.298418240E09 +++$+++ Thank you for informing me. I should really take part in the discussion. Then again, the sun is shining. Maybe I should just go out and take some pictures of [[:Category:Roman Nimes|Roman temples]] :-)  +++$+++ :Thank you for informing me. I should really take part in the discussion. Then again, the sun is shining. Maybe I should just go out and take some pictures of [[:Category:Roman Nimes|Roman temples]] :-) [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 15:44, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

613334 +++$+++ Richard001 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-10 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.221039660E09 +++$+++ Don't know if you know anything about this, but is the 'T. W. Wood' artist in books by Darwin and Wallace (see [[Commons:Category:T. W. Wood]]) the same fella as [[Thomas Waterman Wood]]? They are both artists, and both have the same initials and surname, so it seems a pretty safe bet, although the latter is an American, so I'm not 100% sure on this.  +++$+++ Don't know if you know anything about this, but is the 'T. W. Wood' artist in books by Darwin and Wallace (see [[Commons:Category:T. W. Wood]]) the same fella as [[Thomas Waterman Wood]]? They are both artists, and both have the same initials and surname, so it seems a pretty safe bet, although the latter is an American, so I'm not 100% sure on this. [[User:Richard001|Richard001]] ([[User talk:Richard001|talk]]) 02:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
613335 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613334 +++$+++ 613334 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.221179400E09 +++$+++ Hi Richard, sorry to be so slow about this. A search in Darwin Online shows drawings by Wood, Thomas and some correspondence.[http:\/\/darwin-online.org.uk\/content\/search-results?sort=date-ascending&pageno=0&pagesize=50&freetext=&allfields=&searchid=&name=Wood&dateafter=&datebefore=&searchtitle=&description=&place=&publisher=&periodical=&language=English] I've not been able to find any letters in the Darwin correspondence project, but their advanced search beats me. However, Darwin Online includes a couple of images, and one is of a letter with a drawing on it.[http:\/\/darwin-online.org.uk\/content\/frameset?viewtype=image&itemID=CUL-DAR89.22-23&pageseq=1] The address seems to be 221 Stanhope Street, Hampstead Road NW. From the [[Thomas Waterman Wood]] article he seems to have been permanently settled in New York at that time, so it seems most unlikely to be the same guy, but who can tell. Will try to keep an eye open for hints. . .  +++$+++ :Hi Richard, sorry to be so slow about this. A search in Darwin Online shows drawings by Wood, Thomas and some correspondence.[http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/search-results?sort=date-ascending&pageno=0&pagesize=50&freetext=&allfields=&searchid=&name=Wood&dateafter=&datebefore=&searchtitle=&description=&place=&publisher=&periodical=&language=English] I've not been able to find any letters in the Darwin correspondence project, but their advanced search beats me. However, Darwin Online includes a couple of images, and one is of a letter with a drawing on it.[http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=image&itemID=CUL-DAR89.22-23&pageseq=1] The address seems to be 221 Stanhope Street, Hampstead Road NW. From the [[Thomas Waterman Wood]] article he seems to have been permanently settled in New York at that time, so it seems most unlikely to be the same guy, but who can tell. Will try to keep an eye open for hints. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
613336 +++$+++ Richard001 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613334 +++$+++ 613335 +++$+++ 2008-09-12 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.221216540E09 +++$+++ Maybe I'll try one of the reference desks; there must be someone who would know this.  +++$+++ ::Maybe I'll try one of the reference desks; there must be someone who would know this. [[User:Richard001|Richard001]] ([[User talk:Richard001|talk]]) 03:49, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

9991 +++$+++ Collect +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-01 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.299049440E09 +++$+++ I am pretty sure is Finnish, and therefore I am taking an extreme liberty in hoping you know something about it. I am now familiar with Ulla Procope who designed the Anemone pattern. I have a group of demitasse cups signed \"UP\/TS\" and \"UP\/IF\" and I was hoping you might be able to help me figure out who the second sets of initials belong to (the painters of the design). Many thanks if you can help in this fairly unimportant endeavour.  +++$+++ I am pretty sure is Finnish, and therefore I am taking an extreme liberty in hoping you know something about it. I am now familiar with Ulla Procope who designed the Anemone pattern. I have a group of demitasse cups signed "UP/TS" and "UP/IF" and I was hoping you might be able to help me figure out who the second sets of initials belong to (the painters of the design). Many thanks if you can help in this fairly unimportant endeavour. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 23:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
9992 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9991 +++$+++ 9991 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.299067560E09 +++$+++ As for TS and IF, the second one raises some interest. The letter ''F'' is never used in the [[Finnish alphabet]], so it would be an indication of higher social standing, i.e. membership in the previously Swedish speaking [[Estates of the realm|estates]]. If I had to guess, the last name could be something like [[Florell]] or [[Flodin]], both families have known artist, or maybe [[Fagerroos]], with [http:\/\/www.genealogia.fi\/hakem\/luettelo041s.htm a goldsmith] and a [http:\/\/www.finnishdesignshop.us\/Jan_Fagerroos-d-339.html designer]. --  +++$+++ :As for TS and IF, the second one raises some interest. The letter ''F'' is never used in the [[Finnish alphabet]], so it would be an indication of higher social standing, i.e. membership in the previously Swedish speaking [[Estates of the realm|estates]]. If I had to guess, the last name could be something like [[Florell]] or [[Flodin]], both families have known artist, or maybe [[Fagerroos]], with [http://www.genealogia.fi/hakem/luettelo041s.htm a goldsmith] and a [http://www.finnishdesignshop.us/Jan_Fagerroos-d-339.html designer]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 04:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
9993 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9991 +++$+++ 9991 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.299069420E09 +++$+++ ''P.S.'' \u2013 Here is some more information from the company museum: [http:\/\/www.arabianmuseo.fi\/web\/museumarabia.nsf\/pagesbyid\/7E71C3DAAEB9D6ADC2256F5C004B8927?OpenDocument Kuka on suunnittelija?] (Who is the designer?) They give as an example the signature UP\/AK \u2014 AK being the initials of the anonymous executioner of the design. Here is another list of [http:\/\/antiikkia.blogit.fi\/arabian-taiteilijoiden-signeerauksia\/ known artists.] --  +++$+++ :''P.S.'' – Here is some more information from the company museum: [http://www.arabianmuseo.fi/web/museumarabia.nsf/pagesbyid/7E71C3DAAEB9D6ADC2256F5C004B8927?OpenDocument Kuka on suunnittelija?] (Who is the designer?) They give as an example the signature UP/AK — AK being the initials of the anonymous executioner of the design. Here is another list of [http://antiikkia.blogit.fi/arabian-taiteilijoiden-signeerauksia/ known artists.] -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 04:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
9994 +++$+++ Collect +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9991 +++$+++ 9993 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 11:23:00 +++$+++ 1.299093780E09 +++$+++ The \"F\" is strangely formed - almost like a \"T\" with a second full crossbar. I had not realized it was not going ro pe a Finnish name. Thanks for the help on this.   The links are very interesting to be sure.  +++$+++ ::The "F" is strangely formed - almost like a "T" with a second full crossbar. I had not realized it was not going ro pe a Finnish name. Thanks for the help on this.   The links are very interesting to be sure. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 11:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

272138 +++$+++ LonelyBeacon +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272138 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-29 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.222684800E09 +++$+++ Rather than revert and run, I thought I would stop by and explain myself.  +++$+++ Rather than revert and run, I thought I would stop by and explain myself. [[User:LonelyBeacon|LonelyBeacon]] ([[User talk:LonelyBeacon|talk]]) 03:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
272139 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272138 +++$+++ 272138 +++$+++ 2008-09-29 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.222685940E09 +++$+++ Right, but she very clearly implied she doesn't want Palin as VP.  The statement \"I don't want this job\" is a cute way of saying, \"Don't vote McCain.\"-- +++$+++ :Right, but she very clearly implied she doesn't want Palin as VP.  The statement "I don't want this job" is a cute way of saying, "Don't vote McCain."--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 03:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
272140 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272138 +++$+++ 272139 +++$+++ 2008-09-29 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.222686000E09 +++$+++ Also there's no reason to remove the note about \"don't vote Republican\".  The quote already takes care of stating what she actually said.  No one would take the paraphrase beforehand to be what she said literally when the exact quote is there.-- +++$+++ ::Also there's no reason to remove the note about "don't vote Republican".  The quote already takes care of stating what she actually said.  No one would take the paraphrase beforehand to be what she said literally when the exact quote is there.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 04:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
272141 +++$+++ LonelyBeacon +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272138 +++$+++ 272138 +++$+++ 2008-09-30 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.222771860E09 +++$+++ For what its worth, I like your most recent edit.  IMO, I think the sentiment shouldn't be lost on any reader, and the edit is strongly supported by the reference. Best of luck in future editing.  +++$+++ :For what its worth, I like your most recent edit.  IMO, I think the sentiment shouldn't be lost on any reader, and the edit is strongly supported by the reference. Best of luck in future editing. [[User:LonelyBeacon|LonelyBeacon]] ([[User talk:LonelyBeacon|talk]]) 03:51, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

9996 +++$+++ Orange Suede Sofa +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9996 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.300867740E09 +++$+++ Hei Petri: now that you've made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=TGV&curid=57212&diff=420246100&oldid=417744997 this change] (which I agree with), [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Eric_Pieczak&redirect=no this redirect] no longer makes any sense. Worth removing? <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ Hei Petri: now that you've made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TGV&curid=57212&diff=420246100&oldid=417744997 this change] (which I agree with), [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eric_Pieczak&redirect=no this redirect] no longer makes any sense. Worth removing? <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Orange Suede Sofa|<font color="DarkGreen">Orange Suede Sofa</font>]]</span> ([[User talk:Orange Suede Sofa|talk]]) 01:09, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
9997 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9996 +++$+++ 9996 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.300868340E09 +++$+++ I have no idea who [[Eric Pieczak]] is, so I cannot comment on the issue. Even if he was the president of France I still would not mention him in the leede section of [[TGV]]. I have now redirected it to [[TGV world speed record]]. He is not mentioned in that article either though. --  +++$+++ :I have no idea who [[Eric Pieczak]] is, so I cannot comment on the issue. Even if he was the president of France I still would not mention him in the leede section of [[TGV]]. I have now redirected it to [[TGV world speed record]]. He is not mentioned in that article either though. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 01:19, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
9998 +++$+++ Orange Suede Sofa +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9996 +++$+++ 9997 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.300868880E09 +++$+++ To clarify, I agree that whoever he is, he should not be mentioned in the lead. What I meant is this: maybe the redirect should be removed altogether, thereby making [[Eric Pieczak]] a redlink. Redirecting to an article that doesn't even mention him seems confusing to the casual reader. <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ ::To clarify, I agree that whoever he is, he should not be mentioned in the lead. What I meant is this: maybe the redirect should be removed altogether, thereby making [[Eric Pieczak]] a redlink. Redirecting to an article that doesn't even mention him seems confusing to the casual reader. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Orange Suede Sofa|<font color="DarkGreen">Orange Suede Sofa</font>]]</span> ([[User talk:Orange Suede Sofa|talk]]) 01:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
9999 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 9996 +++$+++ 9998 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.300869420E09 +++$+++ Maybe you can squeeze his name into section [[TGV world speed record#Record of 2007]]. Here is a source: [http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/2007\/04\/03\/us-france-train-idUSL0364103520070403 French train breaks speed record in Champagne]. I really do not care. --  +++$+++ :::Maybe you can squeeze his name into section [[TGV world speed record#Record of 2007]]. Here is a source: [http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/04/03/us-france-train-idUSL0364103520070403 French train breaks speed record in Champagne]. I really do not care. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 01:37, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

534285 +++$+++ Editor at Large +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-15 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.160914740E09 +++$+++ Sorry, got sidetracked. I checked it JUST before you posted and then I forgot to check it again... sorry \u2014 [[User:Editor at Large\/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E<\/font>]] +++$+++ Sorry, got sidetracked. I checked it JUST before you posted and then I forgot to check it again... sorry — [[User:Editor at Large/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E</font>]][[User:Editor at Large|<font color=darkred face=papyrus>ditor <font color=black>at</font> <font color=darkgoldenrod>L</font>arge</font>]][[User talk:Editor at Large|<sup><font color=darkgoldenrod face=papyrus>(<font color=black>speak</font>)</font>]] 05:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
534286 +++$+++ Editor at Large +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534285 +++$+++ 534285 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.160915580E09 +++$+++ *~~[[[[Impatience]]]]~~*<br>Yes, I did. Interesting plan. However, it seems to be against the rules as you've initiated an alliance. Unless the alliance is broken off or they do something so terrible to us it deserves retribution we can't touch 'em. \u2014 [[User:Editor at Large\/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E<\/font>]] +++$+++ : *~~[[[[Impatience]]]]~~*<br>Yes, I did. Interesting plan. However, it seems to be against the rules as you've initiated an alliance. Unless the alliance is broken off or they do something so terrible to us it deserves retribution we can't touch 'em. — [[User:Editor at Large/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E</font>]][[User:Editor at Large|<font color=darkred face=papyrus>ditor <font color=black>at</font> <font color=darkgoldenrod>L</font>arge</font>]][[User talk:Editor at Large|<sup><font color=darkgoldenrod face=papyrus>(<font color=black>speak</font>)</font>]] 05:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
534287 +++$+++ Editor at Large +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534285 +++$+++ 534286 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.160953200E09 +++$+++ There are rules even for sneak attacks. Actually, there are rules ''against'' sneak attacks... \u2014 [[User:Editor at Large\/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E<\/font>]] +++$+++ :: There are rules even for sneak attacks. Actually, there are rules ''against'' sneak attacks... — [[User:Editor at Large/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E</font>]][[User:Editor at Large|<font color=darkred face=papyrus>ditor <font color=black>at</font> <font color=darkgoldenrod>L</font>arge</font>]][[User talk:Editor at Large|<sup><font color=darkgoldenrod face=papyrus>(<font color=black>speak</font>)</font>]] 16:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

569645 +++$+++ Umalee +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-24 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.169678100E09 +++$+++ Can you please tell me what you're going to do to my user page before you actually do it? I want to try to learn to do it myself. Thanks,  +++$+++ Can you please tell me what you're going to do to my user page before you actually do it? I want to try to learn to do it myself. Thanks, [[User:Umalee|Umalee]] 14:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
569646 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569645 +++$+++ 569645 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.169705640E09 +++$+++ Errr, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User%3AUmalee&diff=99593270&oldid=99472079 this was the only edit] that I made to your userpage, nothing technical at all!  Is there something that you would like to happen to your userpage that you would also like me to illustrate on a point-by-point basis?  Let me know if there is and I will be more-than-happy to oblige!  Regards,  +++$+++ :Errr, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AUmalee&diff=99593270&oldid=99472079 this was the only edit] that I made to your userpage, nothing technical at all!  Is there something that you would like to happen to your userpage that you would also like me to illustrate on a point-by-point basis?  Let me know if there is and I will be more-than-happy to oblige!  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

534289 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-15 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.160948820E09 +++$+++ I will be conducting a drill in a few minutes (see the WikiArmy section I just added). I invite you to oversee the drill and comment on the army for our various procedures.--'''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ I will be conducting a drill in a few minutes (see the WikiArmy section I just added). I invite you to oversee the drill and comment on the army for our various procedures.--'''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 14:47, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
534290 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534289 +++$+++ 534289 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.160951220E09 +++$+++ We may have a potential enemy in our hands. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEd&diff=81517063&oldid=81513079] -'''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ :We may have a potential enemy in our hands. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEd&diff=81517063&oldid=81513079] -'''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 15:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
534291 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534289 +++$+++ 534290 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.160993520E09 +++$+++ We have enough information to form a military procedure based on my drill scenarios. Do you think we can terminate drills early?--'''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ ::We have enough information to form a military procedure based on my drill scenarios. Do you think we can terminate drills early?--'''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 03:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
534292 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534289 +++$+++ 534291 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.161076440E09 +++$+++ You know...we have a POW in our hands!!!--'''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ :::You know...we have a POW in our hands!!!--'''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 02:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

10002 +++$+++ Yakushima +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 10002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-27 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.303938780E09 +++$+++ I don't quite understand why this is an article.  \"Moderated nuclear explosion\" turns up [http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar?q=moderated.nuclear.explosion&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=on absolutely no literature in a Google Scholar search].  Likewise for a [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&q=moderated.nuclear.explosion&sa=N&tbs=nws:1,ar:1 Google News Archive search].  A [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?tbm=bks&tbo=1&q=moderated.nuclear.explosion&btnG=Search+Books#sclient=psy&hl=en&tbo=1&tbm=bks&source=hp&q=moderated.nuclear.explosion&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=3eedf68e979f378d moderated.nuclear.explosion Google Book search] hardly does any better: I can't see any books using it as a term.  This leaves your (re-?)creation of the article open to charges of violating [[WP:NOR]].  Citing Busby when he doesn't even use the term \"moderated nuclear explosion\" (but does mention Chernobyl casualty rates not supported by the UN report) doesn't encourage confidence in the sources you're using for this article.  Perhaps I'm missing something here, however, something that people contributing to an Articles for Deletion discussion could pick up.  +++$+++ I don't quite understand why this is an article.  "Moderated nuclear explosion" turns up [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=moderated.nuclear.explosion&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=on absolutely no literature in a Google Scholar search].  Likewise for a [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=moderated.nuclear.explosion&sa=N&tbs=nws:1,ar:1 Google News Archive search].  A [http://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&tbo=1&q=moderated.nuclear.explosion&btnG=Search+Books#sclient=psy&hl=en&tbo=1&tbm=bks&source=hp&q=moderated.nuclear.explosion&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=3eedf68e979f378d moderated.nuclear.explosion Google Book search] hardly does any better: I can't see any books using it as a term.  This leaves your (re-?)creation of the article open to charges of violating [[WP:NOR]].  Citing Busby when he doesn't even use the term "moderated nuclear explosion" (but does mention Chernobyl casualty rates not supported by the UN report) doesn't encourage confidence in the sources you're using for this article.  Perhaps I'm missing something here, however, something that people contributing to an Articles for Deletion discussion could pick up. [[User:Yakushima|Yakushima]] ([[User talk:Yakushima|talk]]) 14:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
10003 +++$+++ Georgewilliamherbert +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 10002 +++$+++ 10002 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.304048580E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 20:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
10004 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 10002 +++$+++ 10003 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.304050080E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ ::-- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 21:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
10005 +++$+++ Georgewilliamherbert +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 10002 +++$+++ 10004 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.304052420E09 +++$+++ Gundersen may be an expert and on CNN but he's making some very fundamental errors on this point and cannot be considered a reliable source on this point.   +++$+++ :::Gundersen may be an expert and on CNN but he's making some very fundamental errors on this point and cannot be considered a reliable source on this point.  [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 21:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
10006 +++$+++ Georgewilliamherbert +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 10002 +++$+++ 10005 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.304053620E09 +++$+++ Thank you.   +++$+++ ::::Thank you.  [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 22:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

534294 +++$+++ Ddcc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-16 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.161034800E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, I've already returned Art of the Dragonlance Saga and Masters of Dragonlance Art. There aren't a lot of god pictures in there, but I'll try to address each. Mina\/Chemosh definitely aren't in either since they're too new, only covers have them. Paladine... there is a uploaded picture of Fizban. Habbakuk\/Mishakal don't think I've seen those, nor have I seen Ionthas. There is a book about Reorx in his human form (I think an Age of Mortals book... or a short story book), except for those two possibilities, don't think so. There are dragons in the artbooks, but the pictures aren't labeled with the exact dragon. You could look through some of the dragon pictures we have and call some of them Sable, Beryl, etc. Sable is on a cover of a book about Dhamon Grimwuylf (I think). There were draconian pictures, but black+white. The cover of Draconian Measures, which is uploaded has draconians, as well as the picture of Laurana being guarded by two draconians with Takhisis in the background. Aside from those, try googling? Sorry if it's not much, but that's all I can think of at the moment.  +++$+++ Unfortunately, I've already returned Art of the Dragonlance Saga and Masters of Dragonlance Art. There aren't a lot of god pictures in there, but I'll try to address each. Mina/Chemosh definitely aren't in either since they're too new, only covers have them. Paladine... there is a uploaded picture of Fizban. Habbakuk/Mishakal don't think I've seen those, nor have I seen Ionthas. There is a book about Reorx in his human form (I think an Age of Mortals book... or a short story book), except for those two possibilities, don't think so. There are dragons in the artbooks, but the pictures aren't labeled with the exact dragon. You could look through some of the dragon pictures we have and call some of them Sable, Beryl, etc. Sable is on a cover of a book about Dhamon Grimwuylf (I think). There were draconian pictures, but black+white. The cover of Draconian Measures, which is uploaded has draconians, as well as the picture of Laurana being guarded by two draconians with Takhisis in the background. Aside from those, try googling? Sorry if it's not much, but that's all I can think of at the moment. [[User:Ddcc|ddcc]] 14:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
534295 +++$+++ Kranar drogin +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534294 +++$+++ 534294 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.161076980E09 +++$+++ Send me a list of what you need, and I will see if I can point you towards the right book. Otherwise, I suggest also finding art websites, search those sites and see what people have created and then ask for permission to use them. That is the only other suggestion I can give, but don't know if that is allowable. Don't know all the rules around here.-- +++$+++ :Send me a list of what you need, and I will see if I can point you towards the right book. Otherwise, I suggest also finding art websites, search those sites and see what people have created and then ask for permission to use them. That is the only other suggestion I can give, but don't know if that is allowable. Don't know all the rules around here.--[[User:Kranar drogin|Kranar drogin]] 02:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
534296 +++$+++ Ddcc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534294 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.161128340E09 +++$+++ I've uploaded Kranar's image to [[:Image:Dawningofanewage.jpg]].  +++$+++ :::I've uploaded Kranar's image to [[:Image:Dawningofanewage.jpg]]. [[User:Ddcc|ddcc]] 16:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

10008 +++$+++ Kuhl-k +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 10008 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-06 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.304713440E09 +++$+++ The article is supposed to be deleted because it was shifted to [[Sailors' revolt in Kiel]]; please check the discussion on either article!!  The mutiny happened in the North Sea OFF Wilhelmshaven. -- +++$+++ The article is supposed to be deleted because it was shifted to [[Sailors' revolt in Kiel]]; please check the discussion on either article!!  The mutiny happened in the North Sea OFF Wilhelmshaven. --[[User:Kuhl-k|Kuhl-k]] ([[User talk:Kuhl-k|talk]]) 13:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
10009 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 10008 +++$+++ 10008 +++$+++ 2011-05-06 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.304717340E09 +++$+++ Thank you for bringing the problem to my attention. I have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sailors%27_revolt_in_Kiel&diff=427749303&oldid=427743715 undone] your [[WP:cut-and-paste move|cut-and-paste move]]. --  +++$+++ :Thank you for bringing the problem to my attention. I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sailors%27_revolt_in_Kiel&diff=427749303&oldid=427743715 undone] your [[WP:cut-and-paste move|cut-and-paste move]]. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 14:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

534297 +++$+++ Editor at Large +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-17 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.161077760E09 +++$+++ I've been working on my Photography presentation all day, am bone tired, and not even half done. I'm presenting tomorrow. I'm trying to stay away from here until I'm done (I was supposed to work on this over the weekend but Wikipedia took over), which is why I'm taking so long. Usually I'm faster! You've just caught me at bad times. \u2014 [[User:Editor at Large\/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E<\/font>]] +++$+++ I've been working on my Photography presentation all day, am bone tired, and not even half done. I'm presenting tomorrow. I'm trying to stay away from here until I'm done (I was supposed to work on this over the weekend but Wikipedia took over), which is why I'm taking so long. Usually I'm faster! You've just caught me at bad times. — [[User:Editor at Large/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E</font>]][[User:Editor at Large|<font color=darkred face=papyrus>ditor <font color=black>at</font> <font color=darkgoldenrod>L</font>arge</font>]][[User talk:Editor at Large|<sup><font color=darkgoldenrod face=papyrus>(<font color=black>speak</font>)</font>]] 02:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
534298 +++$+++ Editor at Large +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534297 +++$+++ 534297 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.161077880E09 +++$+++ Quite alright. Sorry if I sound grumpy. I don't mean to be! :-D \u2014 [[User:Editor at Large\/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Quite alright. Sorry if I sound grumpy. I don't mean to be! :-D — [[User:Editor at Large/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E</font>]][[User:Editor at Large|<font color=darkred face=papyrus>ditor <font color=black>at</font> <font color=darkgoldenrod>L</font>arge</font>]][[User talk:Editor at Large|<sup><font color=darkgoldenrod face=papyrus>(<font color=black>speak</font>)</font>]] 02:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

10010 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 10010 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-12 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.305264960E09 +++$+++ Please don't accuse me of edit warring, when we are in the middle of a discussion on the article talk page.   +++$+++ Please don't accuse me of edit warring, when we are in the middle of a discussion on the article talk page.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 22:36, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
10011 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 10010 +++$+++ 10010 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.305265500E09 +++$+++ You made 16 reverts at [[Raffaele Bendandi]] in 24 hours. (+ one more seven minutes later.) Please take a break and come back the day after tomorrow. --  +++$+++ :You made 16 reverts at [[Raffaele Bendandi]] in 24 hours. (+ one more seven minutes later.) Please take a break and come back the day after tomorrow. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 22:45, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
10012 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 10010 +++$+++ 10011 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.305265920E09 +++$+++ There was no evidence that it was a \"content dispute\" in any meaningful sense - the edits were so absurd, and unreferenced, as to give every appearance of being vandalism.  Now that you have provided a reliable source reporting the suggestion of a connection (refuted, obviously), which I accept should be in the article, we can move on, can't we?   +++$+++ ::There was no evidence that it was a "content dispute" in any meaningful sense - the edits were so absurd, and unreferenced, as to give every appearance of being vandalism.  Now that you have provided a reliable source reporting the suggestion of a connection (refuted, obviously), which I accept should be in the article, we can move on, can't we?  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 22:52, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
10013 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 10010 +++$+++ 10012 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.305266280E09 +++$+++ Please stop. I will not discuss the issues with you today. As I said earlier, take a break and return to the issue the day after tomorrow. --  +++$+++ :::Please stop. I will not discuss the issues with you today. As I said earlier, take a break and return to the issue the day after tomorrow. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 22:58, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
10014 +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ Petri Krohn +++$+++ 10010 +++$+++ 10012 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.305268200E09 +++$+++ Or even better, maybe you would like to work on ''[[The Day After Tomorrow]]''. --  +++$+++ :::Or even better, maybe you would like to work on ''[[The Day After Tomorrow]]''. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] ([[User talk:Petri Krohn#top|talk]]) 23:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

89050 +++$+++ Timbouctou +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-22 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.290475980E09 +++$+++ Hello Joy, I've noticed you moved around a few articles about Croatian political parties. I think the moves were justified but it made me wonder if we should adopt some more consistent way of labeling them. Considering that all parties were banned for almost 45 years between 1945 and 1990 perhaps splitting articles on modern parties which claim lineage to early 20th century parties should be in order (just like the [[People's Party (1841-1918)]] is currently split from the modern [[Croatian People's Party \u2013 Liberal Democrats]]). Likewise, the 1904 [[Croatian Peasant Party]] and the 1861 [[Croatian Party of Rights]] should probably have articles of their own. As for the naming, I believe only the foundation year should follow in parenthesis (which means that modern-day parties with identical names should get that too). Do you agree?  +++$+++ Hello Joy, I've noticed you moved around a few articles about Croatian political parties. I think the moves were justified but it made me wonder if we should adopt some more consistent way of labeling them. Considering that all parties were banned for almost 45 years between 1945 and 1990 perhaps splitting articles on modern parties which claim lineage to early 20th century parties should be in order (just like the [[People's Party (1841-1918)]] is currently split from the modern [[Croatian People's Party – Liberal Democrats]]). Likewise, the 1904 [[Croatian Peasant Party]] and the 1861 [[Croatian Party of Rights]] should probably have articles of their own. As for the naming, I believe only the foundation year should follow in parenthesis (which means that modern-day parties with identical names should get that too). Do you agree? [[User:Timbouctou|''<span style='font-family: Georgia, serif; color:#639;'><em>Timbouctou</em></span>]] 17:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
89051 +++$+++ Timbouctou +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89050 +++$+++ 89050 +++$+++ 2010-11-22 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.290476220E09 +++$+++ In fact, maybe even adding a new subcategory for parties which were made defunct in 1945 would be helpful. Something along the lines of [[:Category:Pre-1945 political parties in Croatia]] or maybe [[:Category:Pre-1929 political parties in Croatia]]?  +++$+++ :In fact, maybe even adding a new subcategory for parties which were made defunct in 1945 would be helpful. Something along the lines of [[:Category:Pre-1945 political parties in Croatia]] or maybe [[:Category:Pre-1929 political parties in Croatia]]? [[User:Timbouctou|''<span style='font-family: Georgia, serif; color:#639;'><em>Timbouctou</em></span>]] 17:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
89052 +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89050 +++$+++ 89050 +++$+++ 2010-11-22 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.290478260E09 +++$+++ Frankly I did this because user Kennechten forced my hand, but still, it makes a modicum of sense. I also moved out the Party of Rights part already, with an even better rationale - there's actual vivid competition for its legacy. I think there is little reason to touch the Peasant Party because I don't recall any competition for its legacy - but if there's a non-non-notable party :) saying they descend from HSS, too, then we should have [[Croatian Peasant Party (1904-1929)]], and link that from all \"children\" parties. I don't think we should touch the generic party names - i.e. keep them pointing to the mainstream modern party because that is still the primary topic in modern-day use. -- +++$+++ : Frankly I did this because user Kennechten forced my hand, but still, it makes a modicum of sense. I also moved out the Party of Rights part already, with an even better rationale - there's actual vivid competition for its legacy. I think there is little reason to touch the Peasant Party because I don't recall any competition for its legacy - but if there's a non-non-notable party :) saying they descend from HSS, too, then we should have [[Croatian Peasant Party (1904-1929)]], and link that from all "children" parties. I don't think we should touch the generic party names - i.e. keep them pointing to the mainstream modern party because that is still the primary topic in modern-day use. --[[User:Joy|Joy &#91;shallot&#93;]] ([[User talk:Joy#top|talk]]) 18:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

534302 +++$+++ Atomic-Super-Suit +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-24 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.161679020E09 +++$+++ Welcome back, pal. Hope you got things sorted out or whatever you went on break for.--[[User:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color=\"blue\">'''S'''<\/font>]][[User talk:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color=\"purple\">'''U'''<\/font>]][[User:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color=\"blue\">'''I'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ Welcome back, pal. Hope you got things sorted out or whatever you went on break for.--[[User:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color="blue">'''S'''</font>]][[User talk:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color="purple">'''U'''</font>]][[User:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color="blue">'''I'''</font>]][[User:Atomic-Super-Suit/EA|<font color="green">'''T'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Atomic-Super-Suit|<sup>''42''</sup>]] 01:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
534303 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534302 +++$+++ 534302 +++$+++ 2006-10-24 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.161679860E09 +++$+++ Me too! BTW I conducted another drill. ;) '''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ :Me too! BTW I conducted another drill. ;) '''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 01:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
534304 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534302 +++$+++ 534303 +++$+++ 2006-10-24 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.161680160E09 +++$+++ I noticed. You see, while you were on WikiBreak, our WikiInventors developed a new system in which high executive officials can keep up with changes and \"spy\" on other places and people. This function can be accessed at [[Special:Watchlist|this page]]. It is a great tool, and we can now watch everything.--'''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ ::I noticed. You see, while you were on WikiBreak, our WikiInventors developed a new system in which high executive officials can keep up with changes and "spy" on other places and people. This function can be accessed at [[Special:Watchlist|this page]]. It is a great tool, and we can now watch everything.--'''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 01:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

525957 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525957 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-25 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.148549640E09 +++$+++ Everyone here in Scouts that know of George and his war experiences is in awe of him.  But, he's so humble and quiet about it, most don't know it. He rarely talks about the war.  I once asked him if he thought some of our guys were kept there and he said some say yes, and some no; he didn't want to say one way or the other.  Now, it is a proven fact the Soviets kept some of our guys after WWII and Korea.  My guess a least a few were kept after Vietnam.  George is quite a guy.  +++$+++ Everyone here in Scouts that know of George and his war experiences is in awe of him.  But, he's so humble and quiet about it, most don't know it. He rarely talks about the war.  I once asked him if he thought some of our guys were kept there and he said some say yes, and some no; he didn't want to say one way or the other.  Now, it is a proven fact the Soviets kept some of our guys after WWII and Korea.  My guess a least a few were kept after Vietnam.  George is quite a guy. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 02:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
525958 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525957 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.148550360E09 +++$+++ I am honored to learn of him.  I don't want to overstep here, but, I expanded the introduction to include dates and location of his capture\/captivity; and that he continued to serve in the Navy after his release.  &mdash; +++$+++ :: I am honored to learn of him.  I don't want to overstep here, but, I expanded the introduction to include dates and location of his capture/captivity; and that he continued to serve in the Navy after his release.  &mdash;[[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] @ 02:46, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
525959 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525957 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.148576700E09 +++$+++ Thanks. We work well together, I don't mind you adding to the article. The article is much nicer now due to our combined efforts.  +++$+++ :::Thanks. We work well together, I don't mind you adding to the article. The article is much nicer now due to our combined efforts. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 10:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

10016 +++$+++ Kiefer.Wolfowitz +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-01 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.309529160E09 +++$+++ I moved this from DE's user page to his talk page. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ I moved this from DE's user page to his talk page. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|<font style="color:blue;background:yellow;">&nbsp;'''Kiefer'''</font>]].[[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz#top|Wolfowitz]]</span></small> 07:06, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
10017 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10016 +++$+++ 10016 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.309530540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the cleanup. \u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks for the cleanup. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein#top|talk]]) 07:29, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
10018 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10016 +++$+++ 10016 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.309530540E09 +++$+++ I'm answering this at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting]] where the same request appears. \u2014 +++$+++ :I'm answering this at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting]] where the same request appears. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein#top|talk]]) 07:29, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

534305 +++$+++  +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ For some reason, your talk page seems to be littered with unconstructive comments and adverts mostly by IPs. You do know that you can remove these? Also, I'm curious as to why you're a target for such vandalism? Do you edit a controversial area of Wikipedia? I'm just curious. DoomsDay349 02:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ For some reason, your talk page seems to be littered with unconstructive comments and adverts mostly by IPs. You do know that you can remove these? Also, I'm curious as to why you're a target for such vandalism? Do you edit a controversial area of Wikipedia? I'm just curious. DoomsDay349 02:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
534306 +++$+++ Lucasbfr +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534305 +++$+++ 534305 +++$+++ 2006-10-24 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.161683280E09 +++$+++ Yeah I know, I prefer keeping all of them as long as it's not page blanking, that makes me feel important :D. I do a lot of RC patrolling , especially when the kiddies are out. Some like less than others being reverted :) --  +++$+++ :Yeah I know, I prefer keeping all of them as long as it's not page blanking, that makes me feel important :D. I do a lot of RC patrolling , especially when the kiddies are out. Some like less than others being reverted :) -- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 02:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

10019 +++$+++ Fly by Night +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10019 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-02 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.309605960E09 +++$+++ Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.   <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. <span style=\"white-space:nowrap;\">\u2014  +++$+++ Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.   <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">— [[User:Fly by Night|<span style="font-family:Segoe print">'''''Fly by Night'''''</span>]] <font color="#000000">([[User talk:Fly by Night|<span style="font-family:Segoe print">talk</span>]])</font></span> 04:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
10020 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10019 +++$+++ 10019 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.309610520E09 +++$+++ You might want to look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Rememberway&oldid=430165175] and the block history here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Wolfkeeper],  +++$+++ :You might want to look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rememberway&oldid=430165175] and the block history here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wolfkeeper], [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 05:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

534308 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-25 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.161762780E09 +++$+++ I saw the predicament that we have now. I will be warning Her Majesty E@L and evacuating her. Anyway, I have the military procedure here: [[User:Ed\/WikiPlomacy]].--'''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ I saw the predicament that we have now. I will be warning Her Majesty E@L and evacuating her. Anyway, I have the military procedure here: [[User:Ed/WikiPlomacy]].--'''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 00:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
534309 +++$+++ Atomic-Super-Suit +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534308 +++$+++ 534308 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.161763200E09 +++$+++ Do not worry, Ed, we've struck up a compramise. Our nations willsoon be a [[Galactic Empire (Star Wars)|Galactic Empire]].--[[User:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color=\"blue\">'''S'''<\/font>]][[User talk:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color=\"purple\">'''U'''<\/font>]][[User:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color=\"blue\">'''I'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Do not worry, Ed, we've struck up a compramise. Our nations willsoon be a [[Galactic Empire (Star Wars)|Galactic Empire]].--[[User:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color="blue">'''S'''</font>]][[User talk:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color="purple">'''U'''</font>]][[User:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color="blue">'''I'''</font>]][[User:Atomic-Super-Suit/EA|<font color="green">'''T'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Atomic-Super-Suit|<sup>''42''</sup>]] 01:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
534310 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534308 +++$+++ 534309 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.161763560E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAtomic-Super-Suit&diff=83543066&oldid=83542777] Doomsday349, I, General Ed of the WikiArmy, hereby put you under arrest for treason against Her Majesty [[User:Editor at Large|Editor at Large]]. You have the right to not remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of biased martial law. You have the right to speak to an unreliable attorney, and to have a disruptive attorney present during any illegal questioning. If you cannot afford a dishonest lawyer, one will be provided for you at [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales's]] expense.--'''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAtomic-Super-Suit&diff=83543066&oldid=83542777] Doomsday349, I, General Ed of the WikiArmy, hereby put you under arrest for treason against Her Majesty [[User:Editor at Large|Editor at Large]]. You have the right to not remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of biased martial law. You have the right to speak to an unreliable attorney, and to have a disruptive attorney present during any illegal questioning. If you cannot afford a dishonest lawyer, one will be provided for you at [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales's]] expense.--'''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 01:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
534311 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534308 +++$+++ 534309 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.161764580E09 +++$+++ Dude, you're in prison-'''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ ::Dude, you're in prison-'''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 01:23, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
534312 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534308 +++$+++ 534311 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.161764760E09 +++$+++ I challenge you to war, [[Sparta|Spartan]] style. --'''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ :::I challenge you to war, [[Sparta|Spartan]] style. --'''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 01:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
534313 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534308 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.161765480E09 +++$+++ Of course =) You thought I was serious?????--'''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ :::::Of course =) You thought I was serious?????--'''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 01:38, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

10022 +++$+++ Daniele.tampieri +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.310176200E09 +++$+++ Hi David (could I call you so or should I call you \"Prof. Eppstein\"?), I saw you corrected all the mess I did with the references in the entry about [[Frederick J. Almgren, Jr.]], shuffling names ans surames: well done! Thank you very much! :D  +++$+++ Hi David (could I call you so or should I call you "Prof. Eppstein"?), I saw you corrected all the mess I did with the references in the entry about [[Frederick J. Almgren, Jr.]], shuffling names ans surames: well done! Thank you very much! :D [[User:Daniele.tampieri|Daniele.tampieri]] ([[User talk:Daniele.tampieri|talk]]) 18:50, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
10023 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10022 +++$+++ 10022 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310176500E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! (And calling me David is fine.) \u2014 +++$+++ :You're welcome! (And calling me David is fine.) —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein#top|talk]]) 18:55, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

10024 +++$+++ PassaMethod +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.310182200E09 +++$+++ I have stored some very important files on my livejournal diary account assumiming my files are safe there. Is it safe? Can i rest assured that it will still be there one year from now?  +++$+++ I have stored some very important files on my livejournal diary account assumiming my files are safe there. Is it safe? Can i rest assured that it will still be there one year from now? [[User:PassaMethod|<font color="grey" face="Tahoma">Pass a Method</font>]] [[User talk:PassaMethod|<font color="orange" face="papyrus">talk</font>]] 20:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
10025 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10024 +++$+++ 10024 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310184480E09 +++$+++ Why ask me? I have no inside knowledge about Livejournal. But my default answer to this kind of question, for any online service provider, is \"no, keep a backup yourself\". \u2014 +++$+++ :Why ask me? I have no inside knowledge about Livejournal. But my default answer to this kind of question, for any online service provider, is "no, keep a backup yourself". —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein#top|talk]]) 21:08, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
10026 +++$+++ PassaMethod +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10024 +++$+++ 10025 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310238960E09 +++$+++ Do you know any similar websites to livejournal where i could keep notes on a diary ?  +++$+++ ::Do you know any similar websites to livejournal where i could keep notes on a diary ? [[User:PassaMethod|<font color="grey" face="Tahoma">Pass a Method</font>]] [[User talk:PassaMethod|<font color="orange" face="papyrus">talk</font>]] 12:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
10027 +++$+++ Justin W Smith +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10024 +++$+++ 10026 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.310243760E09 +++$+++ As David already said, why are you asking him??  There are many resources on the web that attempt to provide good answers for this type of question. You're looking in the wrong place for the answer. <span style=\"white-space:nowrap;\"><b> +++$+++ ::: As David already said, why are you asking him??  There are many resources on the web that attempt to provide good answers for this type of question. You're looking in the wrong place for the answer. <span style="white-space:nowrap;"><b>[[User:Justin W Smith|Justin W Smith]]</b> <i><sup>[[User talk:Justin W Smith|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Justin W Smith|stalk]]</sub></i></span> 13:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

534314 +++$+++ Editor at Large +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-25 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.161766380E09 +++$+++ So, you managed to get embroiled in a war! Congratulations, but might I remind you that you were only the General of the Army and I am Queen? How exactly did you manage to escape with half the country all by yourself? None of the other officers helped in any way. \u2014 [[User:Editor at Large\/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E<\/font>]] +++$+++ So, you managed to get embroiled in a war! Congratulations, but might I remind you that you were only the General of the Army and I am Queen? How exactly did you manage to escape with half the country all by yourself? None of the other officers helped in any way. — [[User:Editor at Large/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E</font>]][[User:Editor at Large|<font color=darkred face=papyrus>ditor <font color=black>at</font> <font color=darkgoldenrod>L</font>arge</font>]][[User talk:Editor at Large|<sup><font color=darkgoldenrod face=papyrus>(<font color=black>speak</font>)</font>]] 01:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
534315 +++$+++ Editor at Large +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534314 +++$+++ 534314 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.161766980E09 +++$+++ I see. All the people we never saw or heard about... and the soldiers we never heard about... Well, Doomsday, prepare yourself for a trial within the next week. You have to answer for your crimes. \u2014 [[User:Editor at Large\/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E<\/font>]] +++$+++ : I see. All the people we never saw or heard about... and the soldiers we never heard about... Well, Doomsday, prepare yourself for a trial within the next week. You have to answer for your crimes. — [[User:Editor at Large/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E</font>]][[User:Editor at Large|<font color=darkred face=papyrus>ditor <font color=black>at</font> <font color=darkgoldenrod>L</font>arge</font>]][[User talk:Editor at Large|<sup><font color=darkgoldenrod face=papyrus>(<font color=black>speak</font>)</font>]] 02:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
534316 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534314 +++$+++ 534315 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.161849240E09 +++$+++ I formed the peace negotiations. You HAVE to go to trial, but your punishment will NEVER go as far as imprisonment. Also check out my Alliance proposal. =) '''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ ::I formed the peace negotiations. You HAVE to go to trial, but your punishment will NEVER go as far as imprisonment. Also check out my Alliance proposal. =) '''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 00:54, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
534317 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534314 +++$+++ 534316 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.161851700E09 +++$+++ Part G seems hazy. You should clarify that. =) '''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ :::Part G seems hazy. You should clarify that. =) '''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|I'm lonely, talk to me]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ed|contribs]]</sub> 01:35, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

10031 +++$+++ Avilella +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.311607620E09 +++$+++ [[User:Avilella]]  +++$+++ [[User:Avilella]] [[User:Avilella|Avilella]] ([[User talk:Avilella|talk]]) 08:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
10032 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10031 +++$+++ 10031 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311634140E09 +++$+++ As long as you check whether they pass [[WP:PROF]] first, that sounds fine. In the case of [[Jonathan K. Pritchard]], he has very high citation numbers on Google scholar (I generally look for a half dozen or so papers with 100+ citations and he has a few with thousands), and is a full professor at a very good university, so it looks clear that criterion 1 at least is passed. The ones to watch out for are assistant professors and postdocs who haven't yet had enough time in their careers to make an impact or differentiate themselves from their advisors, or maybe worse senior researchers with a steady stream of very-low-impact publications.. \u2014 +++$+++ :As long as you check whether they pass [[WP:PROF]] first, that sounds fine. In the case of [[Jonathan K. Pritchard]], he has very high citation numbers on Google scholar (I generally look for a half dozen or so papers with 100+ citations and he has a few with thousands), and is a full professor at a very good university, so it looks clear that criterion 1 at least is passed. The ones to watch out for are assistant professors and postdocs who haven't yet had enough time in their careers to make an impact or differentiate themselves from their advisors, or maybe worse senior researchers with a steady stream of very-low-impact publications.. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein#top|talk]]) 15:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
10033 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10031 +++$+++ 10031 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.311648840E09 +++$+++ It looked like a [[WP:SPS|self-published]] web page rather than like a [[WP:RS|reliably published]] academic paper to me. But if you can tell me the journal or peer-reviewed conference that it appeared in, we can put it back. \u2014 +++$+++ :It looked like a [[WP:SPS|self-published]] web page rather than like a [[WP:RS|reliably published]] academic paper to me. But if you can tell me the journal or peer-reviewed conference that it appeared in, we can put it back. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein#top|talk]]) 19:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

534320 +++$+++ Editor at Large +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-26 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.161930540E09 +++$+++ Taking over section. Umm... browsing while doing work, yes; time to really edit, no. Seriously, I've got a real trial going on and somebody's going to get away with murder (literally) if I don't get my work done. Darn Wikipedia\u2665 has taken over my life...  \u2014 [[User:Editor at Large\/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E<\/font>]] +++$+++ Taking over section. Umm... browsing while doing work, yes; time to really edit, no. Seriously, I've got a real trial going on and somebody's going to get away with murder (literally) if I don't get my work done. Darn Wikipedia♥ has taken over my life...  — [[User:Editor at Large/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E</font>]][[User:Editor at Large|<font color=darkred face=papyrus>ditor <font color=black>at</font> <font color=darkgoldenrod>L</font>arge</font>]][[User talk:Editor at Large|<sup><font color=darkgoldenrod face=papyrus>(<font color=black>speak</font>)</font>]] 23:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
534321 +++$+++ Editor at Large +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534320 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.161933360E09 +++$+++ [[Prosecutor|Possibly]]... <small>([[Qui-Gon Jinn|it's a quote]])<\/small>\u2014 [[User:Editor at Large\/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::[[Prosecutor|Possibly]]... <small>([[Qui-Gon Jinn|it's a quote]])</small>— [[User:Editor at Large/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E</font>]][[User:Editor at Large|<font color=darkred face=papyrus>ditor <font color=black>at</font> <font color=darkgoldenrod>L</font>arge</font>]][[User talk:Editor at Large|<sup><font color=darkgoldenrod face=papyrus>(<font color=black>speak</font>)</font>]] 00:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

10034 +++$+++ Ignalvarez +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312321620E09 +++$+++ You will find here an external link to the \"===> I'm here (*)\" page:  http:\/\/www.caida.org\/data\/publications\/bydate\/index.xml (in 2011). Do you think that this reference can be added again in the article? Best regards.  +++$+++ You will find here an external link to the "===> I'm here (*)" page:  http://www.caida.org/data/publications/bydate/index.xml (in 2011). Do you think that this reference can be added again in the article? Best regards. [[User:Ignalvarez|Ignalvarez]] ([[User talk:Ignalvarez|talk]]) 14:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
10035 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10034 +++$+++ 10034 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.312324800E09 +++$+++ \"LArge NETworks VIsualization tool\" doesn't look like the name of a conference, journal, or other reliable third-party publisher to me. \u2014 +++$+++ :"LArge NETworks VIsualization tool" doesn't look like the name of a conference, journal, or other reliable third-party publisher to me. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein#top|talk]]) 15:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

10036 +++$+++ Ignalvarez +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10036 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.312345140E09 +++$+++ Dear David, I already say to you in my previous message (25 July 2011) that this in just a tool, not a publication, and I also asked if external links were enough, but you only answer today negatively, before that I provide an external reference. Please, to be clear, you only consider conference or journal as a reliable third-party publisher?  The link that I provided is: 1_ a permanent web-page; 2_ it is a third party, i.e., I do not work at CAIDA, 3_ it is prestigious research center, 4_ it is not a home page, 5_ it is related to the topic of my tool. I understand that the authenticity of the information is the basement of this site (I agree with this), and this is fulfilled with this 5 points that I exposed.  +++$+++ Dear David, I already say to you in my previous message (25 July 2011) that this in just a tool, not a publication, and I also asked if external links were enough, but you only answer today negatively, before that I provide an external reference. Please, to be clear, you only consider conference or journal as a reliable third-party publisher?  The link that I provided is: 1_ a permanent web-page; 2_ it is a third party, i.e., I do not work at CAIDA, 3_ it is prestigious research center, 4_ it is not a home page, 5_ it is related to the topic of my tool. I understand that the authenticity of the information is the basement of this site (I agree with this), and this is fulfilled with this 5 points that I exposed. [[User:Ignalvarez|Ignalvarez]] ([[User talk:Ignalvarez|talk]]) 21:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
10037 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10036 +++$+++ 10036 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.312350900E09 +++$+++ I have pointed you before to [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|the Wikipedia guidelines on what constitutes a reliable source]]. Please read it this time. In this context \"third party\" means someone not directly associated with you and your co-authors; that is, it's self-published if you or your co-authors put it up on a web site under your or your employer's control, but reliably published if it's in a peer-reviewed journal or some other medium that involves people outside your circle agreeing to publish it. \u2014 +++$+++ :I have pointed you before to [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|the Wikipedia guidelines on what constitutes a reliable source]]. Please read it this time. In this context "third party" means someone not directly associated with you and your co-authors; that is, it's self-published if you or your co-authors put it up on a web site under your or your employer's control, but reliably published if it's in a peer-reviewed journal or some other medium that involves people outside your circle agreeing to publish it. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein#top|talk]]) 22:55, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

89054 +++$+++ Kennechten +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-27 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.290902220E09 +++$+++ my piece of advice :Do not delete what you dislike!-- +++$+++ my piece of advice :Do not delete what you dislike!--[[User:Kennechten|Kennechten]] ([[User talk:Kennechten|talk]]) 15:57, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
89055 +++$+++ DIREKTOR +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89054 +++$+++ 89054 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.290912600E09 +++$+++ And here's one from me: do not edit war to push new edits, even if they're not political propaganda. --<font face=\"Eras Bold ITC\"> +++$+++ :And here's one from me: do not edit war to push new edits, even if they're not political propaganda. --<font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:DIREKTOR|<font color="DimGray">DIREKTOR</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DIREKTOR|<font color="Gray">TALK</font>]])</sup></font> 18:50, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

10038 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.311951240E09 +++$+++ Thank you for a DYK review in a style I like for [[Gloria (Handel)]]! Did you see my note about a review I am ready to frame (for decency) on that overloaded discussion page? -- +++$+++ Thank you for a DYK review in a style I like for [[Gloria (Handel)]]! Did you see my note about a review I am ready to frame (for decency) on that overloaded discussion page? --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:54, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
10039 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10038 +++$+++ 10038 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311979140E09 +++$+++ I hadn't, but now I have. I guess too many people there don't want to [[WP:AGF]] that such reviews really are serious and thorough. \u2014 +++$+++ :I hadn't, but now I have. I guess too many people there don't want to [[WP:AGF]] that such reviews really are serious and thorough. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein#top|talk]]) 15:39, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

272183 +++$+++ Schwnj +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-19 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.240194840E09 +++$+++ I noticed your edit to the [[Phoenix, Arizona]] page. I agree (and didn't change any of it), but I felt compelled to mention that Phoenix's population is far greater than Atlanta. - +++$+++ I noticed your edit to the [[Phoenix, Arizona]] page. I agree (and didn't change any of it), but I felt compelled to mention that Phoenix's population is far greater than Atlanta. -[[User:Schwnj|'''Nick''']]<font color="#FF9900">[[User talk:Schwnj|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">talk</sup>]]</font> 19:34, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
272184 +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ Loodog +++$+++ 272183 +++$+++ 272183 +++$+++ 2009-04-19 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.240195140E09 +++$+++ Only in city proper.-- +++$+++ :Only in city proper.--[[User:Loodog|Loodog]] ([[User talk:Loodog#top|talk]]) 19:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

10040 +++$+++ RJHall +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.312407720E09 +++$+++ I'd like to find out why you believe the Handley-Taylor (1974) reference on the [[Wong Phui Nam]] article is a \"vanity scam\". This may be true, but I would like to verify it before removal. Thank you. Regards,  +++$+++ I'd like to find out why you believe the Handley-Taylor (1974) reference on the [[Wong Phui Nam]] article is a "vanity scam". This may be true, but I would like to verify it before removal. Thank you. Regards, [[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 14:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
10041 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10040 +++$+++ 10040 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.312408500E09 +++$+++ Please read our article on the [[International Biographical Centre]]. Basically they make their money by putting people in their who's who listings (or making up awards to give them) and then getting them to buy the books (pr award plaques etc) for exorbitant amounts. For which reason, entries in these books and awards can't be trusted to be objective. Also, it makes including them in our articles a bit embarrassing for the subjects if they ever realize they've been scammed. \u2014 +++$+++ :Please read our article on the [[International Biographical Centre]]. Basically they make their money by putting people in their who's who listings (or making up awards to give them) and then getting them to buy the books (pr award plaques etc) for exorbitant amounts. For which reason, entries in these books and awards can't be trusted to be objective. Also, it makes including them in our articles a bit embarrassing for the subjects if they ever realize they've been scammed. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein#top|talk]]) 14:55, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
10042 +++$+++ RJHall +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ 10040 +++$+++ 10041 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.312409220E09 +++$+++ Okay, thank you for the clarification. Regards,  +++$+++ :: Okay, thank you for the clarification. Regards, [[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 15:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

534330 +++$+++ E@L +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-28 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.162094820E09 +++$+++ Read the message I left Ed about jurors. \u2014 [[User:E@L\/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E<\/font>]] +++$+++ Read the message I left Ed about jurors. — [[User:E@L/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E</font>]][[User:E@L|<font color=darkred face=papyrus>ditor <font color=black>at</font> <font color=darkgoldenrod>L</font>arge</font>]][[User talk:E@L|<sup><font color=darkgoldenrod face=papyrus>(<font color=black>speak</font>)</font>]] 21:07, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
534331 +++$+++ E@L +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534330 +++$+++ 534330 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.162095180E09 +++$+++ yep, just get Ed to fill his spots, or Aleith and Biblio if they want to participate. Biblio might want to be security to intervene when things get heated.  \u2014 [[User:E@L\/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E<\/font>]] +++$+++ : yep, just get Ed to fill his spots, or Aleith and Biblio if they want to participate. Biblio might want to be security to intervene when things get heated.  — [[User:E@L/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E</font>]][[User:E@L|<font color=darkred face=papyrus>ditor <font color=black>at</font> <font color=darkgoldenrod>L</font>arge</font>]][[User talk:E@L|<sup><font color=darkgoldenrod face=papyrus>(<font color=black>speak</font>)</font>]] 21:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
534332 +++$+++ E@L +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534330 +++$+++ 534331 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.162103040E09 +++$+++ Am back (stuff put off 40 minutes -- 35 now). Overview of court procedures will be listed at [[User:Editor at Large\/Courtroom\/Court procedures]]. Not there yet, but prepare yourself. \u2014 [[User:E@L\/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E<\/font>]] +++$+++ :: Am back (stuff put off 40 minutes -- 35 now). Overview of court procedures will be listed at [[User:Editor at Large/Courtroom/Court procedures]]. Not there yet, but prepare yourself. — [[User:E@L/Esperanza|<font color=#336600 face=papyrus>E</font>]][[User:E@L|<font color=darkred face=papyrus>ditor <font color=black>at</font> <font color=darkgoldenrod>L</font>arge</font>]][[User talk:E@L|<sup><font color=darkgoldenrod face=papyrus>(<font color=black>speak</font>)</font>]] 23:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

10047 +++$+++ Camaron +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10047 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-02 11:13:00 +++$+++ 1.201979580E09 +++$+++ Congratulations!  +++$+++ Congratulations! [[User:Camaron|Camaron | Chris]] <small>[[User talk:Camaron|(talk)]]</small> 11:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
10048 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10047 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-02 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.202006700E09 +++$+++ Wow, thank you so much Camaron | Chris!  It's been fun helping edit and update the ESC articles.  +++$+++ ::Wow, thank you so much Camaron | Chris!  It's been fun helping edit and update the ESC articles. [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 18:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

10049 +++$+++ Grk1011 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-15 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.216183440E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I award Greekboy this barnstar for the many contributions he has made to articles concerning the Greek participation in [[Eurovision]].  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award Greekboy this barnstar for the many contributions he has made to articles concerning the Greek participation in [[Eurovision]]. [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 21:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
10050 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10049 +++$+++ 10049 +++$+++ 2008-07-16 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.216200960E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 02:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

289869 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-22 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.153564980E09 +++$+++ Re: your full protection at [[Lentil (slur)]], I was thinking maybe it would be a good idea to leave it sprotected so we can uncover all of the established socks.  Just a thought.  \u2014 +++$+++ Re: your full protection at [[Lentil (slur)]], I was thinking maybe it would be a good idea to leave it sprotected so we can uncover all of the established socks.  Just a thought.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
289870 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.153565100E09 +++$+++ I'm up to 16 so far BTW.  \u2014 +++$+++ :I'm up to 16 so far BTW.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
289871 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 289870 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.153565220E09 +++$+++ Fair enough.  Can we get checkuser to find the ISP source of them all, or do we have to play whack-a-mole all night? \u2014 +++$+++ ::Fair enough.  Can we get checkuser to find the ISP source of them all, or do we have to play whack-a-mole all night? —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 03:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
289872 +++$+++ Mr. Starchy +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 289871 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.153565280E09 +++$+++ Well it looks like you don't need to, they are no longer active. Lets see what happens though. +++$+++ :::Well it looks like you don't need to, they are no longer active. Lets see what happens though.[[User:Mr. Starchy|Mr. Starchy]] 03:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
289873 +++$+++ Fan-1967 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 289872 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.153565400E09 +++$+++ What do you mean \"they\"?  +++$+++ ::::What do you mean "they"? [[User:Fan-1967|Fan-1967]] 03:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
289874 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 289873 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.153565460E09 +++$+++ By sprotecting, at least we'll get the established ones - otherwise they'll go back underground.  I'm newer at the admin game and don't have checkuser rights but it might be warranted in this case.  The checkuser folks may disagree when they see how childish this puppeteer is being - I haven't been down that road.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::By sprotecting, at least we'll get the established ones - otherwise they'll go back underground.  I'm newer at the admin game and don't have checkuser rights but it might be warranted in this case.  The checkuser folks may disagree when they see how childish this puppeteer is being - I haven't been down that road.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
289875 +++$+++ Mr. Starchy +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 289874 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.153565520E09 +++$+++ For they, I mean the socks. +++$+++ ::::::For they, I mean the socks.[[User:Mr. Starchy|Mr. Starchy]] 03:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
289876 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 289875 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.153565580E09 +++$+++ Would that be a case of [[singular they]]? \u2014 +++$+++ :::::::Would that be a case of [[singular they]]? —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 03:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
289877 +++$+++ Fan-1967 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 289876 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.153565640E09 +++$+++ More like a first-person singular \"they\". Note that Mr. Starchy has never made an edit that did not involve lentils.  +++$+++ ::::::::More like a first-person singular "they". Note that Mr. Starchy has never made an edit that did not involve lentils. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan-1967]] 03:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
289878 +++$+++ Mr. Starchy +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 289877 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.153565700E09 +++$+++ I mean the vandal. I actually voted keep, but see the reason. +++$+++ :::::::::I mean the vandal. I actually voted keep, but see the reason.[[User:Mr. Starchy|Mr. Starchy]] 03:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
289879 +++$+++ Fan-1967 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 289878 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.153565760E09 +++$+++ Don't insult our intelligence.  +++$+++ ::::::::::Don't insult our intelligence. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan-1967]] 03:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
289880 +++$+++ Mr. Starchy +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 289879 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.153565880E09 +++$+++ That made no sense. ANyway I mostly contribute on deleted articles, such as tagging them. I have dits under older accounts (it was about a year ago I craeted this one) that you can see,A if I could remember them. +++$+++ :::::::::::That made no sense. ANyway I mostly contribute on deleted articles, such as tagging them. I have dits under older accounts (it was about a year ago I craeted this one) that you can see,A if I could remember them.[[User:Mr. Starchy|Mr. Starchy]] 03:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
289881 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ 289869 +++$+++ 289880 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.153566000E09 +++$+++ Silly rabbit. We can all see your contribs list, and your first edit (under this account) is on July 6 2006. What exactly do you hope to achieve? \u2014 +++$+++ ::::::::::::Silly rabbit. We can all see your contribs list, and your first edit (under this account) is on July 6 2006. What exactly do you hope to achieve? —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 04:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

263819 +++$+++ Never Mystic +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-25 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.159242600E09 +++$+++ If you're an administrator, I'd appreciate it if you just went ahead and deleted the image altogether seeing as it can't be used in many articles. If you're not, I thank you for the heads-up nonetheless. =)  +++$+++ If you're an administrator, I'd appreciate it if you just went ahead and deleted the image altogether seeing as it can't be used in many articles. If you're not, I thank you for the heads-up nonetheless. =) [[User:Never Mystic|Never Mystic]] ([[User talk:Never Mystic|t]][[Special:Contributions/Never Mystic|c]]) 20:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
263820 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263819 +++$+++ 263819 +++$+++ 2006-09-25 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.159242720E09 +++$+++ Done!  +++$+++ :Done! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
263821 +++$+++ Never Mystic +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263819 +++$+++ 263820 +++$+++ 2006-09-25 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.159242720E09 +++$+++ That was fast! Thanks for the speedy service!  +++$+++ ::That was fast! Thanks for the speedy service! [[User:Never Mystic|Never Mystic]] ([[User talk:Never Mystic|t]][[Special:Contributions/Never Mystic|c]]) 20:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
263822 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263819 +++$+++ 263821 +++$+++ 2006-09-25 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.159243020E09 +++$+++ That's what my ex girlfriend used to say.  +++$+++ :::That's what my ex girlfriend used to say. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
263823 +++$+++ Never Mystic +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263819 +++$+++ 263822 +++$+++ 2006-09-25 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.159243380E09 +++$+++ What memories.  +++$+++ ::::What memories. [[User:Never Mystic|Never Mystic]] ([[User talk:Never Mystic|t]][[Special:Contributions/Never Mystic|c]]) 21:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
263824 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263819 +++$+++ 263819 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.159379700E09 +++$+++ As long as you don't remove the references. I suggest you read the comments on the peer review to get an idea of what people have said about it.  +++$+++ :As long as you don't remove the references. I suggest you read the comments on the peer review to get an idea of what people have said about it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

532806 +++$+++ Andrejj +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532806 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-10 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.181489040E09 +++$+++ See: [[Talk:Andrej Preston]] ;-) -- +++$+++ See: [[Talk:Andrej Preston]] ;-) --[[User:Andrejj|AndrejJ]] 08:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
532807 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532806 +++$+++ 532806 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.181574420E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. But I am concerned about the comment on the talk page so I am opening a discussion. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. But I am concerned about the comment on the talk page so I am opening a discussion. Regards. --'''[[User:tone|Tone]]''' 08:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

176438 +++$+++ MyMoloboaccount +++$+++ Skäpperöd +++$+++ 176438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-15 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.300227600E09 +++$+++ Please correct your error.-- +++$+++ Please correct your error.--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 15:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
176439 +++$+++ Skäpperöd +++$+++ Skäpperöd +++$+++ 176438 +++$+++ 176438 +++$+++ 2011-03-15 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.300234080E09 +++$+++ The \"h\"-typo was corrected to proper \"\u0144\" long before you posted here.  +++$+++ :The "h"-typo was corrected to proper "ń" long before you posted here. [[User:Skäpperöd|Skäpperöd]] ([[User talk:Skäpperöd#top|talk]]) 17:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

10054 +++$+++ Camaron +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-07 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.223431020E09 +++$+++ Hello, I thought you might be interested in gaining rollback access for your account. This feature allows you to rapidly revert vandalism and other highly inappropriate edits in one click, which you might find helpful for Eurovision articles which can be the subject of vandalism. Please let me know here or on my talk page if you want this feature so I can quickly add you.  +++$+++ Hello, I thought you might be interested in gaining rollback access for your account. This feature allows you to rapidly revert vandalism and other highly inappropriate edits in one click, which you might find helpful for Eurovision articles which can be the subject of vandalism. Please let me know here or on my talk page if you want this feature so I can quickly add you. [[User:Camaron|Camaron | Chris]] <small>[[User talk:Camaron|(talk)]]</small> 18:57, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
10055 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10054 +++$+++ 10054 +++$+++ 2008-10-08 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.223533740E09 +++$+++ Looks like a good feature.  This will come in handy when Eurovision season is in full swing again.  Thanks for offering this to me.  +++$+++ :Looks like a good feature.  This will come in handy when Eurovision season is in full swing again.  Thanks for offering this to me. [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 23:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
10056 +++$+++ Camaron +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10054 +++$+++ 10055 +++$+++ 2008-10-12 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.223873880E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I forgot to come back to you. I have now given it you before I forget again.  +++$+++ ::Sorry, I forgot to come back to you. I have now given it you before I forget again. [[User:Camaron|Camaron | Chris]] <small>[[User talk:Camaron|(talk)]]</small> 21:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
10057 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10054 +++$+++ 10056 +++$+++ 2008-10-12 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.223877000E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :)  +++$+++ :::Thanks! :) [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 22:50, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

534344 +++$+++ BradBeattie +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534344 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-31 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.162288380E09 +++$+++ No no, this isn't grudge. This is just me opening a bunch of pages from the category, putting them all up for AFD, then waiting for general consensus before I put up another 5 or 10. I figure if I did them all at once and people had an issue with it, I'd have wasted some people's time. Best to take it a little at a time. -- +++$+++ No no, this isn't grudge. This is just me opening a bunch of pages from the category, putting them all up for AFD, then waiting for general consensus before I put up another 5 or 10. I figure if I did them all at once and people had an issue with it, I'd have wasted some people's time. Best to take it a little at a time. --[[User:BradBeattie|Brad Beattie]] <sup>[[User talk:BradBeattie|(talk)]]</sup> 01:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
534345 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534344 +++$+++ 534344 +++$+++ 2006-10-31 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.162288440E09 +++$+++ Interesting...it's just funny, you know? They're all identical...funny. '''''<font color=\"black\">[[User:DoomsDay349|Dooms]]<\/font><font color=\"orange\">[[User talk:DoomsDay349|Day]]<\/font><font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ :Interesting...it's just funny, you know? They're all identical...funny. '''''<font color="black">[[User:DoomsDay349|Dooms]]</font><font color="orange">[[User talk:DoomsDay349|Day]]</font><font color="black">[[User:DoomsDay349/Esperanza|349]]</font>'''''   '''<font color= "orange">Happy Halloween!</font>''' 01:54, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

534347 +++$+++  +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-02 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.162467420E09 +++$+++ get going!!! You're late!--'''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ get going!!! You're late!--'''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]] <sup>''[[Special:Random|<font color="orange">Trick?</font>]]''</sup><small> ''or'' </small> <sub> ''[[Halloween|<font color="orange">Treat?</font>]]'' </sub> 03:37, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
534348 +++$+++ Atomic-Super-Suit +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534347 +++$+++ 534347 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.162467480E09 +++$+++ It's starting now?--[[User:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color=\"blue\">'''SU'''<\/font>]][[User talk:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color=\"blue\">'''I'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :It's starting now?--[[User:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color="blue">'''SU'''</font>]][[User talk:Atomic-Super-Suit|<font color="blue">'''I'''</font>]][[User:Atomic-Super-Suit/EA|<font color="green">'''T'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Atomic-Super-Suit|<sup>''42!''</sup>]] 03:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
534349 +++$+++  +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534347 +++$+++ 534348 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.162467720E09 +++$+++ Of course! The defense has agreed to Thursday (today) as the trial date. It is 3:00 UTC, so we've already started late. Please direct yourself to [[User:Editor at Large\/Courtroom]]--'''[[User:Ed\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]''' +++$+++ ::Of course! The defense has agreed to Thursday (today) as the trial date. It is 3:00 UTC, so we've already started late. Please direct yourself to [[User:Editor at Large/Courtroom]]--'''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''[[User:Ed|d]] <sup>''[[Special:Random|<font color="orange">Trick?</font>]]''</sup><small> ''or'' </small> <sub> ''[[Halloween|<font color="orange">Treat?</font>]]'' </sub> 03:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

10060 +++$+++ Mike Halterman +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10060 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-19 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.229758440E09 +++$+++ I dropped this off at Grk1011's page too, but you may want to make a feasible article out of [[Elpida Karayianopoulou]], considering what impact she had on Greek music.  +++$+++ I dropped this off at Grk1011's page too, but you may want to make a feasible article out of [[Elpida Karayianopoulou]], considering what impact she had on Greek music. [[User:Mike Halterman|Mike H.]] [[User talk:Mike Halterman|Fierce!]] 23:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
10061 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10060 +++$+++ 10060 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.229764080E09 +++$+++ I don't know much information about her, but I will look into it. I know a couple of her songs.  +++$+++ :I don't know much information about her, but I will look into it. I know a couple of her songs. [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 01:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

10062 +++$+++ Grk1011 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-26 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.230293220E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 04:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
10063 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10062 +++$+++ 10062 +++$+++ 2008-12-26 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.230338760E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :)  +++$+++ :Thanks! :) [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 16:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

10064 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10064 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-02 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.230932280E09 +++$+++ Hi Greekboy, I've opened a reassessment on [[Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008]] as I feel there should be greater encyclopedic information (broad coverage) within the article. I don't think it would take much work to bring it up to scratch as all the information is already out there, some of it in place on Wikipedia. But it would be worth people doing the work as the article is used as an example of a \"FOO in the Eurovision Song Contest YEAR\" Good Article, and it would be worth giving people something reasonably comprehensive and worthwhile to work toward. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ Hi Greekboy, I've opened a reassessment on [[Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008]] as I feel there should be greater encyclopedic information (broad coverage) within the article. I don't think it would take much work to bring it up to scratch as all the information is already out there, some of it in place on Wikipedia. But it would be worth people doing the work as the article is used as an example of a "FOO in the Eurovision Song Contest YEAR" Good Article, and it would be worth giving people something reasonably comprehensive and worthwhile to work toward. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 13:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
10065 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10064 +++$+++ 10064 +++$+++ 2009-01-02 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.230951660E09 +++$+++ I actually disagree with you. Every country has a different selection process every year, different amount of songs, different amount of singers, ect. There is no way you can have 1 format for every country. You can have a common guideline of information to provide (like it is now) but not the same exact format. I actually think that Greece in ESC 2008 provides substantial information already. It provides information about the songs in the running, who composed them, ect. For example, on the portugal page, there is a whole section on \"Producers\", which is completely irrelevant to Greece in ESC. Other than that, all the info is already in the article, but just in a different format that fits the selection process better. (Besides and artist bio which I honestly do not think is needed on this page. This is about the contest, not what she has done. That is what linking is for)  +++$+++ :I actually disagree with you. Every country has a different selection process every year, different amount of songs, different amount of singers, ect. There is no way you can have 1 format for every country. You can have a common guideline of information to provide (like it is now) but not the same exact format. I actually think that Greece in ESC 2008 provides substantial information already. It provides information about the songs in the running, who composed them, ect. For example, on the portugal page, there is a whole section on "Producers", which is completely irrelevant to Greece in ESC. Other than that, all the info is already in the article, but just in a different format that fits the selection process better. (Besides and artist bio which I honestly do not think is needed on this page. This is about the contest, not what she has done. That is what linking is for) [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 19:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

569656 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-28 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.170047400E09 +++$+++ Sorry. Not trying to tell you how to do your job; while I tagged all of these edits, you were so quick off the mark that I was not able to locate the nqme of the author, and so could not take note of his block!-- +++$+++ Sorry. Not trying to tell you how to do your job; while I tagged all of these edits, you were so quick off the mark that I was not able to locate the nqme of the author, and so could not take note of his block!--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 21:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
569657 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569656 +++$+++ 569656 +++$+++ 2007-01-28 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.170047580E09 +++$+++ I am sorry to read about your wife on your userpage.  You have my sympathies in this difficult time. Regards,  +++$+++ :I am sorry to read about your wife on your userpage.  You have my sympathies in this difficult time. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
569658 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569656 +++$+++ 569657 +++$+++ 2007-01-28 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.170047880E09 +++$+++ Thank you.-- +++$+++ ::Thank you.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 21:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

272211 +++$+++ BigShock +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-12 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.147503420E09 +++$+++ Yo dude, I'm new on Wikipedia, and in my (very little) spare time right now I'm trying to design a decent user page. I was wondering, where do you get things to put on your user page, like those bars about yourself (I don't know what they're called)? I picked a random person to ask this... sorry -- +++$+++ Yo dude, I'm new on Wikipedia, and in my (very little) spare time right now I'm trying to design a decent user page. I was wondering, where do you get things to put on your user page, like those bars about yourself (I don't know what they're called)? I picked a random person to ask this... sorry --[[User:BigShock|BigShock]] 23:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
272212 +++$+++ BigShock +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272211 +++$+++ 272211 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.147557240E09 +++$+++ Thanks... question #2: how do I get my Babel box to align ahead of my other boxes on the right? Every time I put it before the other boxes in the coding, the other boxes end up to the left of the Babel box-- +++$+++ :  Thanks... question #2: how do I get my Babel box to align ahead of my other boxes on the right? Every time I put it before the other boxes in the coding, the other boxes end up to the left of the Babel box--[[User:BigShock|BigShock]] 14:54, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

10068 +++$+++ Debresser +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10068 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-16 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.234851300E09 +++$+++ In the article [[Apagorevmeno]] you bring a reference <nowiki><ref name=\"StarNewsBackstage\"><\/nowiki> You forgot to enter the url. I entered a url which is probably a mirror of the one you mean. Could you please enter the correct one. Thank you.  +++$+++ In the article [[Apagorevmeno]] you bring a reference <nowiki><ref name="StarNewsBackstage"></nowiki> You forgot to enter the url. I entered a url which is probably a mirror of the one you mean. Could you please enter the correct one. Thank you. [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] ([[User talk:Debresser|talk]]) 22:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
10069 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10068 +++$+++ 10068 +++$+++ 2009-02-17 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.234857780E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that's it. Thanks. I didn't know that I could source the actual YouTube link. On another note, I am wondering if there is another reference type for sourcing television shows or interviews.  +++$+++ :Yeah, that's it. Thanks. I didn't know that I could source the actual YouTube link. On another note, I am wondering if there is another reference type for sourcing television shows or interviews. [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 00:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
10070 +++$+++ Grk1011 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10068 +++$+++ 10069 +++$+++ 2009-02-17 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.234868880E09 +++$+++ Keep in mind that we can't link to work that infringes on someone else's copyright. Consider just linking the show, not the video you saw the show in.  +++$+++ ::Keep in mind that we can't link to work that infringes on someone else's copyright. Consider just linking the show, not the video you saw the show in. [[User:Grk1011|Grk1011/Stephen]] ([[User talk:Grk1011|talk]]) 03:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
10071 +++$+++ Debresser +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10068 +++$+++ 10069 +++$+++ 2009-02-17 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.234901340E09 +++$+++ That's one thing. Generally YouTube isn't the best source available (as it is self-published). But it is better than nothing. The suggestion of the previous user is a good one in general.  +++$+++ :: That's one thing. Generally YouTube isn't the best source available (as it is self-published). But it is better than nothing. The suggestion of the previous user is a good one in general. [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] ([[User talk:Debresser|talk]]) 12:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

525966 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525966 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-31 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.149070320E09 +++$+++ Point taken.  (Quite honestly, though, after [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_ADF&diff=54290521&oldid=54280441 this response], I wasn't hoping for much.)   +++$+++ Point taken.  (Quite honestly, though, after [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_ADF&diff=54290521&oldid=54280441 this response], I wasn't hoping for much.)  [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 03:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
525967 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525966 +++$+++ 525966 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.149071280E09 +++$+++ As far as the creator issue is concerened, I don't think it's really significant at this point, since the entire ADF project has only a handful of members.  If we can get even a small task force going that will actually edit Australian articles, we can ensure a minimal level of adherence to general guidelines with little fuss, even if the creator doesn't particularly like us for it.  +++$+++ :As far as the creator issue is concerened, I don't think it's really significant at this point, since the entire ADF project has only a handful of members.  If we can get even a small task force going that will actually edit Australian articles, we can ensure a minimal level of adherence to general guidelines with little fuss, even if the creator doesn't particularly like us for it. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 03:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
525968 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525966 +++$+++ 525967 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.149071700E09 +++$+++ True.  Hopefully he'll be interested.  (I think he's on wikibreak until June 5, though; I have no idea how big of a mess we'll have on our hands by then.)  +++$+++ ::True.  Hopefully he'll be interested.  (I think he's on wikibreak until June 5, though; I have no idea how big of a mess we'll have on our hands by then.) [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 03:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
525969 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525966 +++$+++ 525966 +++$+++ 2006-06-01 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.149193140E09 +++$+++ Nope, looks like I was right to begin with.  Justinbrett's deeply insightful analysis of the other countries' articles reveals that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Military_history&diff=56307965&oldid=56305767 \"I have no desire for ours to look like either of them\"].  This is going to be a ''big'' mess. ;-)  +++$+++ :Nope, looks like I was right to begin with.  Justinbrett's deeply insightful analysis of the other countries' articles reveals that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Military_history&diff=56307965&oldid=56305767 "I have no desire for ours to look like either of them"].  This is going to be a ''big'' mess. ;-) [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 13:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
525970 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525966 +++$+++ 525969 +++$+++ 2006-06-02 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.149262440E09 +++$+++ Probably best to wait and see if your effort bears fruit before drawing too many lines in the sand; but fundamentally, I see no reason why we should (willingly) cede articles to a project that's not interested in a cordial relationship.  Our ability to stamp down on their disregard for conventions in practice will probably be limited by the number of editors working on Australian topics we have access to; but I think we should maintain both (1) our claim that Australian topics fall within our scope and (2) our insistence that they follow the same guidelines every other country does, even if these points are largely a theoretical issue for the time being.  +++$+++ ::Probably best to wait and see if your effort bears fruit before drawing too many lines in the sand; but fundamentally, I see no reason why we should (willingly) cede articles to a project that's not interested in a cordial relationship.  Our ability to stamp down on their disregard for conventions in practice will probably be limited by the number of editors working on Australian topics we have access to; but I think we should maintain both (1) our claim that Australian topics fall within our scope and (2) our insistence that they follow the same guidelines every other country does, even if these points are largely a theoretical issue for the time being. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 08:34, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
525971 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525966 +++$+++ 525966 +++$+++ 2006-06-09 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.149885480E09 +++$+++ Ah, excellent.  If he could perhaps find another person or two who'd be interested in working in a task force (somehow I don't think recruiting the ADF project members will be too productive), I can set one up.   +++$+++ :Ah, excellent.  If he could perhaps find another person or two who'd be interested in working in a task force (somehow I don't think recruiting the ADF project members will be too productive), I can set one up.  [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 13:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

534360 +++$+++ Atomic-Super-Suit +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-10 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.163159880E09 +++$+++ You know, I think something's up with her. I know, that's obvious. And as Esperenzians, we should give her WikiLove or something, right?--<font face=\"comic sans ms\">[[User:Atomic-Super-Suit|'''SU''']][[User_talk:Atomic-Super-Suit|'''I''']] +++$+++ You know, I think something's up with her. I know, that's obvious. And as Esperenzians, we should give her WikiLove or something, right?--<font face="comic sans ms">[[User:Atomic-Super-Suit|'''SU''']][[User_talk:Atomic-Super-Suit|'''I''']][[User:Atomic-Super-Suit/EA|<font color="green">'''T'''</font>]]</font>[[Special:Contributions/Atomic-Super-Suit|<sup>''42''</sup>]] 03:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
534361 +++$+++ Bearly541 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534360 +++$+++ 534360 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.163161680E09 +++$+++ Please see [[User:Editor_at_Large]].  The edit may be by a vandal or something?  I will do an IP check real quick. <b><font color=\"FF9999\" face=\"trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ :Please see [[User:Editor_at_Large]].  The edit may be by a vandal or something?  I will do an IP check real quick. <b><font color="FF9999" face="trebuchet ms">[[User:Bearly541|Bearly451]]</font> <small><font color="A6F591" face="trebuchet ms">[[User talk:Bearly541|talk]]</font></small></b> 04:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
534362 +++$+++ Bearly541 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534360 +++$+++ 534361 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.163162460E09 +++$+++ Please go here.  [[User_talk:70.52.224.233]] and [[User:Editor_at_Large]]. I think she was sexually abused by her teacher.  I don't want to start any rumors, but you have to ask Kyoko or her privately what's happening. <b><font color=\"FF9999\" face=\"trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ ::Please go here.  [[User_talk:70.52.224.233]] and [[User:Editor_at_Large]]. I think she was sexually abused by her teacher.  I don't want to start any rumors, but you have to ask Kyoko or her privately what's happening. <b><font color="FF9999" face="trebuchet ms">[[User:Bearly541|Bearly451]]</font> <small><font color="A6F591" face="trebuchet ms">[[User talk:Bearly541|talk]]</font></small></b> 04:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
534363 +++$+++ Tachikoma +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534360 +++$+++ 534362 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.163220660E09 +++$+++ Hi there, I respect E@L's right to privacy, so the most I'll say is that someone has grievously wronged her. If you want to know any more, you'll have to ask her personally. She's hurting really badly, and she needs all the support and reassurance you can give her. --[[User:Tachikoma|<font face=\"zapfino\">Kyok<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::Hi there, I respect E@L's right to privacy, so the most I'll say is that someone has grievously wronged her. If you want to know any more, you'll have to ask her personally. She's hurting really badly, and she needs all the support and reassurance you can give her. --[[User:Tachikoma|<font face="zapfino">Kyok</font>]][[User:Tachikoma/Esperanza|<font color="green" face="zapfino">o</font>]] 20:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
534364 +++$+++ Tachikoma +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534360 +++$+++ 534363 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.163293140E09 +++$+++ I got an e-mail from her, and she said that she will convey her explanation of what happened, sometime in the near future. I'll let her do the talking, OK? Thanks for the smile, though I'm not sure if it's formatted properly. Yes, I am feeling a little better, but still not normal. At least I don't feel suicidal right now. --[[User:Tachikoma|<font face=\"zapfino\">Kyok<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::::I got an e-mail from her, and she said that she will convey her explanation of what happened, sometime in the near future. I'll let her do the talking, OK? Thanks for the smile, though I'm not sure if it's formatted properly. Yes, I am feeling a little better, but still not normal. At least I don't feel suicidal right now. --[[User:Tachikoma|<font face="zapfino">Kyok</font>]][[User:Tachikoma/Esperanza|<font color="green" face="zapfino">o</font>]] 16:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

272217 +++$+++ Jack O'Lantern +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-04 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.152061920E09 +++$+++ Not sure. This is just a personal preference - but I always edit by release date. I.e. in the case of [[Lucas Black]], Killer Diller was released before Fast and Furious, and Deepwater will be released after (a film festival wouldn't necessarily qualify as a release). Again, that is just a personal preference and I have no idea how it's supposed to be done policy-wise, or if there even is one.  +++$+++ Not sure. This is just a personal preference - but I always edit by release date. I.e. in the case of [[Lucas Black]], Killer Diller was released before Fast and Furious, and Deepwater will be released after (a film festival wouldn't necessarily qualify as a release). Again, that is just a personal preference and I have no idea how it's supposed to be done policy-wise, or if there even is one. [[User:Jack O'Lantern|Mad Jack]] 18:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
272218 +++$+++ Jack O'Lantern +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272217 +++$+++ 272217 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.152091980E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I usually find it best to organize by US release date (biased there, I guess - but most of the actor articles I work on are American anyway). Because, if you, say, get something like 5 films a year for an actor, you're left with no choice but to organize them chronologically.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I usually find it best to organize by US release date (biased there, I guess - but most of the actor articles I work on are American anyway). Because, if you, say, get something like 5 films a year for an actor, you're left with no choice but to organize them chronologically. [[User:Jack O'Lantern|Mad Jack]] 02:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
272219 +++$+++ Jack O'Lantern +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272217 +++$+++ 272218 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.152145200E09 +++$+++ Thank you !  +++$+++ ::Thank you ! [[User:Jack O'Lantern|Mad Jack]] 17:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

10074 +++$+++ GreekStar12 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-17 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.240011540E09 +++$+++ Hello, I've noticed that you have uploaded many music samples for various articles. Do you think you could tell me how to do that, please? Thanks in advance.  +++$+++ Hello, I've noticed that you have uploaded many music samples for various articles. Do you think you could tell me how to do that, please? Thanks in advance. [[User:GreekStar12|GreekStar12]] ([[User talk:GreekStar12|talk]]) 16:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
10075 +++$+++ GreekStar12 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10074 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.240012020E09 +++$+++ OK, well that was wierd. I directed this question to [[User:Egtheod]], however it sent me here. I guess he may have copied your layout, lol. Well, if you could be able to help me it would also be appreciated. \u039a\u03b1\u03bb\u03cc \u03a0\u03ac\u03c3\u03c7\u03b1  +++$+++ ::OK, well that was wierd. I directed this question to [[User:Egtheod]], however it sent me here. I guess he may have copied your layout, lol. Well, if you could be able to help me it would also be appreciated. Καλό Πάσχα [[User:GreekStar12|GreekStar12]] ([[User talk:GreekStar12|talk]]) 16:47, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

272221 +++$+++ Mirjay +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-16 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.153077720E09 +++$+++ If you find the time and haven't got anything better to do, could you please tell me how to make my userboxes line up like yours do? I have tried ...countless times,  but not having any luck whatsoever!-- +++$+++ If you find the time and haven't got anything better to do, could you please tell me how to make my userboxes line up like yours do? I have tried ...countless times,  but not having any luck whatsoever!--[[User:Mirjay|Mirjay]] 12:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
272222 +++$+++ Mirjay +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272221 +++$+++ 272221 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.153077960E09 +++$+++ oops you didn't add the box anyway!  hehe, apologies for being a dipstick. It would still be cool if you could help me fix the userbox issue...... it's bugging the crap out of me. -- +++$+++ :oops you didn't add the box anyway!  hehe, apologies for being a dipstick. It would still be cool if you could help me fix the userbox issue...... it's bugging the crap out of me. --[[User:Mirjay|Mirjay]] 12:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
272223 +++$+++ Mirjay +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272221 +++$+++ 272221 +++$+++ 2006-07-24 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.153780740E09 +++$+++ FUNNY!  I beg to differ.  It is not funny making yourself look like a complete dipstick! :) Thanks for your not very helpfullness ... I have been looking for those templates and have been most disappointed with the zilcho results... hmmmmph -- +++$+++ : FUNNY!  I beg to differ.  It is not funny making yourself look like a complete dipstick! :) Thanks for your not very helpfullness ... I have been looking for those templates and have been most disappointed with the zilcho results... hmmmmph --[[User:Mirjay|Mirjay]] 15:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

89061 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-07 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.291780200E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your help on this. As the original editor of SISGC, I was stymied as to what I should do once it split, I was too close to it, you provided the perfect solution!-- +++$+++ Thank you for your help on this. As the original editor of SISGC, I was stymied as to what I should do once it split, I was too close to it, you provided the perfect solution!--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 19:50, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
89062 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89061 +++$+++ 89061 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.291781280E09 +++$+++ That was my fault for making it generic. I lost my Wife in a hit-and-run right about the time Serbia and Montenegro split. I could create a roughly duplicate article, but I couldn't think out of the box for that one, still couldn't, looking at it now. You helped get through my mental block.-- +++$+++ :That was my fault for making it generic. I lost my Wife in a hit-and-run right about the time Serbia and Montenegro split. I could create a roughly duplicate article, but I couldn't think out of the box for that one, still couldn't, looking at it now. You helped get through my mental block.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 20:08, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
89063 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89061 +++$+++ 89062 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.291781580E09 +++$+++ That's exactly what was needed, was a fresh pair of eyes. Maybe I am the resident expert, but I had tunnel-vision.-- +++$+++ ::That's exactly what was needed, was a fresh pair of eyes. Maybe I am the resident expert, but I had tunnel-vision.--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Kintetsubuffalo]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 20:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

10084 +++$+++ Camaron +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-25 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.253911800E09 +++$+++ You have already been notified that your uploads that have been transferred to Commons are up for deletion at [[Commons:Commons:Deletion requests\/Files uploaded by Greekboy on en.wikipedia]], a response from you would be very helpful here. You don't seem to have an account on Commons but you can easily create one like on the English Wikipedia. Alternatively you can merge your account so it works under the name Greekboy on all Wikimedia Projects, please go to [[Special:MergeAccount]] to do this. The deletion request centres around an accusation that you stole an image from [http:\/\/www.gettyimages.com\/detail\/57655859\/Getty-Images-Entertainment GettyImages]. Per \"innocent until proven guilty\" and my interactions with you I am assuming at present that these accusations are false. However if you did steal the image, or others, I highly recommend you go to the deletion request and come clean now, no further action will likely be taken against you (except deletion of the offending images) and not doing so may have more severe consequences later. I received information that you responded to this deletion request in private correspondence, and that it turns out some images are your own and some are used with permission. Even if you don't want to go through the long process of obtaining evidence of permission so the images can stay on Commons, it would be highly appreciated if you identified which images have been uploaded as your own work, but are actually permission based, so the licences can be corrected and the images later deleted if evidence of permission is not provided. Otherwise all your uploaded images, including potentially those on the English Wikipedia, may be blanket deleted instead. Not responding to the deletion request will leave a dark cloud over your head, as these are serious accusations being made, and by not responding it may be assumed that these accusations are true. I am aware that you are wikibonked, but it is worth your time helping us sort this issue out.  +++$+++ You have already been notified that your uploads that have been transferred to Commons are up for deletion at [[Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Greekboy on en.wikipedia]], a response from you would be very helpful here. You don't seem to have an account on Commons but you can easily create one like on the English Wikipedia. Alternatively you can merge your account so it works under the name Greekboy on all Wikimedia Projects, please go to [[Special:MergeAccount]] to do this. The deletion request centres around an accusation that you stole an image from [http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/57655859/Getty-Images-Entertainment GettyImages]. Per "innocent until proven guilty" and my interactions with you I am assuming at present that these accusations are false. However if you did steal the image, or others, I highly recommend you go to the deletion request and come clean now, no further action will likely be taken against you (except deletion of the offending images) and not doing so may have more severe consequences later. I received information that you responded to this deletion request in private correspondence, and that it turns out some images are your own and some are used with permission. Even if you don't want to go through the long process of obtaining evidence of permission so the images can stay on Commons, it would be highly appreciated if you identified which images have been uploaded as your own work, but are actually permission based, so the licences can be corrected and the images later deleted if evidence of permission is not provided. Otherwise all your uploaded images, including potentially those on the English Wikipedia, may be blanket deleted instead. Not responding to the deletion request will leave a dark cloud over your head, as these are serious accusations being made, and by not responding it may be assumed that these accusations are true. I am aware that you are wikibonked, but it is worth your time helping us sort this issue out. [[User:Camaron|Camaron<span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span>  Christopher]]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span> [[User talk:Camaron|talk]]</small> 13:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
10085 +++$+++ Camaron +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10084 +++$+++ 10084 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.255554720E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your response, now hopefully this issue can be fully sorted out.  +++$+++ : Thank you for your response, now hopefully this issue can be fully sorted out. [[User:Camaron|Camaron<span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span>  Christopher]]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span> [[User talk:Camaron|talk]]</small> 14:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
10086 +++$+++ Martin H. +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10084 +++$+++ 10085 +++$+++ 2009-10-31 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.257013680E09 +++$+++ You still not corrected the authorship claim at [[:File:VissiDaimoneslive.jpg]]. Also [[:File:VissiMalaTheatro.jpg]] I assume. What about the protester at [[File talk:Antique Paparizou Panagiotidis.jpg]]? -- +++$+++ ::You still not corrected the authorship claim at [[:File:VissiDaimoneslive.jpg]]. Also [[:File:VissiMalaTheatro.jpg]] I assume. What about the protester at [[File talk:Antique Paparizou Panagiotidis.jpg]]? --[[User:Martin H.|Martin H.]] ([[User talk:Martin H.|talk]]) 11:28, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
10087 +++$+++ Martin H. +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10084 +++$+++ 10085 +++$+++ 2009-10-31 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.257017160E09 +++$+++ And [[:File:VissiKarvelas98.jpg]], also not yours, but claimed so. -- +++$+++ ::And [[:File:VissiKarvelas98.jpg]], also not yours, but claimed so. --[[User:Martin H.|Martin H.]] ([[User talk:Martin H.|talk]]) 12:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

272230 +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-30 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.154300760E09 +++$+++ Not sure why, but that made me laugh so hard!  Oh, and I agree with you abour Brandon Boyd :)  - +++$+++ Not sure why, but that made me laugh so hard!  Oh, and I agree with you abour Brandon Boyd :)  -[[User:Brian1979|Bri]] 16:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
272231 +++$+++ Zythe +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272230 +++$+++ 272230 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.154301360E09 +++$+++ Heh, why thank you, I do try! I'm a big fan of sixes myself. :P ~<b><font color=\"purple\"> +++$+++ :Heh, why thank you, I do try! I'm a big fan of sixes myself. :P ~<b><font color="purple">[[User:Zythe|Zythe]]</font></b><sup>[[User talk:Zythe|Talk to me!]]</sup> 16:16, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
272232 +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272230 +++$+++ 272231 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.154301960E09 +++$+++ I actually used to have a 5 up, because I considered the fact that I've been with four women in my life as 'incidentally heterosexual', but I thought about it and changed it...2 of the 4 were drunken mistakes, and a third ended up being a mistake...only the last was really thought out and purposeful and meaningful, because it was gfor my son.  Ah well, thus I'm a 6!- +++$+++ ::I actually used to have a 5 up, because I considered the fact that I've been with four women in my life as 'incidentally heterosexual', but I thought about it and changed it...2 of the 4 were drunken mistakes, and a third ended up being a mistake...only the last was really thought out and purposeful and meaningful, because it was gfor my son.  Ah well, thus I'm a 6!-[[User:Brian1979|Bri]] 16:26, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
272233 +++$+++ Zythe +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272230 +++$+++ 272232 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.154302320E09 +++$+++ Well, it's way more confusing with me and I wish it wasn't. I wish I could be one of those people who \"just know\" but I don't. Sometimes I like one more than the other. Sometimes I contemplate I may be straighter than my straight mates and that weirds it out. Sometimes I can be repulsed by an individual and it makes me re-evaluate whether I not I like their entire gender. Meh, it goes back and forth. So I can be quite happy to identify as gay in situations or as straight, but I don't think a lot of people understand that because they see the three terms as mutually exclusive. ~<b><font color=\"purple\"> +++$+++ :::Well, it's way more confusing with me and I wish it wasn't. I wish I could be one of those people who "just know" but I don't. Sometimes I like one more than the other. Sometimes I contemplate I may be straighter than my straight mates and that weirds it out. Sometimes I can be repulsed by an individual and it makes me re-evaluate whether I not I like their entire gender. Meh, it goes back and forth. So I can be quite happy to identify as gay in situations or as straight, but I don't think a lot of people understand that because they see the three terms as mutually exclusive. ~<b><font color="purple">[[User:Zythe|Zythe]]</font></b><sup>[[User talk:Zythe|Talk to me!]]</sup> 16:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

534376 +++$+++ Tachikoma +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534376 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-10 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163221560E09 +++$+++ Hi, just please don't delete stuff from my talk page, OK? I've sent an e-mail asking E@L how private she wants to keep this, and I'm awaiting a response. Thanks.  --[[User:Tachikoma|<font face=\"zapfino\">Kyok<\/font>]] +++$+++ Hi, just please don't delete stuff from my talk page, OK? I've sent an e-mail asking E@L how private she wants to keep this, and I'm awaiting a response. Thanks.  --[[User:Tachikoma|<font face="zapfino">Kyok</font>]][[User:Tachikoma/Esperanza|<font color="green" face="zapfino">o</font>]] 21:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
534377 +++$+++ Tachikoma +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534376 +++$+++ 534376 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.163221920E09 +++$+++ OK, I understand. It's just that in the past I have had problems with people typing thoughtless comments on my talk page, and then returning a day or two later to revise whatever they said, after I had already read and answered their messages, so I'm sorry if I wasn't assuming good faith. --[[User:Tachikoma|<font face=\"zapfino\">Kyok<\/font>]] +++$+++ :OK, I understand. It's just that in the past I have had problems with people typing thoughtless comments on my talk page, and then returning a day or two later to revise whatever they said, after I had already read and answered their messages, so I'm sorry if I wasn't assuming good faith. --[[User:Tachikoma|<font face="zapfino">Kyok</font>]][[User:Tachikoma/Esperanza|<font color="green" face="zapfino">o</font>]] 21:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

569660 +++$+++ SERSeanCrane +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-30 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.170202140E09 +++$+++ In joining these projects, I recently started an article on a player that did not have one, [[:Adam Bostick]]. There are a few other players I have interest in doing this for, and my question has to do with uploading pictures. As you can see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Adam_Bostick.jpg here], I've supplied reasoning for fair use rationale but I was hoping you could elaborate on the process of determining if such rationale is proper. Any advice you can offer in this realm would be much appreciated, thanks!  +++$+++ In joining these projects, I recently started an article on a player that did not have one, [[:Adam Bostick]]. There are a few other players I have interest in doing this for, and my question has to do with uploading pictures. As you can see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Adam_Bostick.jpg here], I've supplied reasoning for fair use rationale but I was hoping you could elaborate on the process of determining if such rationale is proper. Any advice you can offer in this realm would be much appreciated, thanks! [[User:SERSeanCrane|SERSeanCrane]] 16:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
569661 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569660 +++$+++ 569660 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.170230940E09 +++$+++ Hello there!  This is a tricky one, with each side having merit in this debate.  The rationale for Wikipedia is that the project cannot infringe copyright, which is outlined in [[:Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Fair_use_considerations]].  The guidance at [[:Wikipedia:Fair_use#Images]] suggests that publicity photos - as your example appears to be - may be used for identification of the subject, with the corollary that [[:Wikipedia:Publicity photos|the publicity photo]] could potentially be used for a limited time until a photo of the subject is taken and uploaded under the GFDL licence.  This is always going to be an equivocal point on the project as actions taken with the best intentions don't allow for leniency in the eyes of the copyright holders if they choose to enforce their legal rights to their images.  If you have searched high and low and asked for a photo taken by an amateur\/fan that could be released under the GFDL licence and come up with nothing other than the uploaded image then that may be the best argument that you have.  If it is deleted then it is with the best interests of the project at heart. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello there!  This is a tricky one, with each side having merit in this debate.  The rationale for Wikipedia is that the project cannot infringe copyright, which is outlined in [[:Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Fair_use_considerations]].  The guidance at [[:Wikipedia:Fair_use#Images]] suggests that publicity photos - as your example appears to be - may be used for identification of the subject, with the corollary that [[:Wikipedia:Publicity photos|the publicity photo]] could potentially be used for a limited time until a photo of the subject is taken and uploaded under the GFDL licence.  This is always going to be an equivocal point on the project as actions taken with the best intentions don't allow for leniency in the eyes of the copyright holders if they choose to enforce their legal rights to their images.  If you have searched high and low and asked for a photo taken by an amateur/fan that could be released under the GFDL licence and come up with nothing other than the uploaded image then that may be the best argument that you have.  If it is deleted then it is with the best interests of the project at heart. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 00:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

10093 +++$+++ Per aspera ad Astra +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10093 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-24 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.264370640E09 +++$+++ Hi Greekboy, I noticed that you reverted my edit. I think it is general consensus to have a section of codeshare partners at airline articles, but to not list codeshare destinations (because codeshare flights are still operated by another airline than the one the article is about). A Delta flights stays a Delta flights, even though the ticket is issued by Olympic Air. I appreciate your thoughts and comments. I dare say that I intend to re-revert this edit in case you cannot proof me wrong.  +++$+++ Hi Greekboy, I noticed that you reverted my edit. I think it is general consensus to have a section of codeshare partners at airline articles, but to not list codeshare destinations (because codeshare flights are still operated by another airline than the one the article is about). A Delta flights stays a Delta flights, even though the ticket is issued by Olympic Air. I appreciate your thoughts and comments. I dare say that I intend to re-revert this edit in case you cannot proof me wrong. [[User:Per aspera ad Astra|Per aspera ad Astra]] ([[User talk:Per aspera ad Astra|talk]]) 14:04, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
10094 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10093 +++$+++ 10093 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.264395960E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure about the rest, but I think there should be some mention of the JFK flight, since it is sold directly on Olympic's site and they advertise it as their destination. They even applied with DOT for it if that counts for anything.  +++$+++ :I'm not sure about the rest, but I think there should be some mention of the JFK flight, since it is sold directly on Olympic's site and they advertise it as their destination. They even applied with DOT for it if that counts for anything. [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 21:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
10095 +++$+++ Per aspera ad Astra +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10093 +++$+++ 10094 +++$+++ 2010-01-25 08:09:00 +++$+++ 1.264435740E09 +++$+++ Once again, codeshare flights are ''meant'' to be sold by both airlines, and they usually show on both route maps. Still, these flights have only ''one'' carrier operating it, even though others may issue tickets. Here at Wikipedia (per [[WP:NOTTRAVEL]]) we have articles on airlines to show their significance and importance. This is why we list codeshare partnerships. On which routes these agreements apply can change without further notice, and does not bring any more information. Those interested in it will find out that Delta is an American airline, therefore linking Athens to the US via its New York hub. As I see the matter, it is ''general consensus'' not to list codeshare destinations. I have changed the article accordingly.  +++$+++ ::Once again, codeshare flights are ''meant'' to be sold by both airlines, and they usually show on both route maps. Still, these flights have only ''one'' carrier operating it, even though others may issue tickets. Here at Wikipedia (per [[WP:NOTTRAVEL]]) we have articles on airlines to show their significance and importance. This is why we list codeshare partnerships. On which routes these agreements apply can change without further notice, and does not bring any more information. Those interested in it will find out that Delta is an American airline, therefore linking Athens to the US via its New York hub. As I see the matter, it is ''general consensus'' not to list codeshare destinations. I have changed the article accordingly. [[User:Per aspera ad Astra|Per aspera ad Astra]] ([[User talk:Per aspera ad Astra|talk]]) 08:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

534383 +++$+++ Caroldermoid +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-11 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.163298900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the Welcome. I don't want to seem so incompetent, but I have never collaborated before on a Wiki project.  I found the talk page pretty intimidating.  I don't want to make work for you, but can you give me a specific project, even if just copy-editing, or a bit of research to do? I am finding myself lacking in BE BOLD lol. If I just need to watch for a month, that is cool too. TIA <font color=\"midnightblue\" face=\"comic sans ms\">'''[[User:Caroldermoid|<font color=\"midnightblue\" face=\"comic sans ms\">Carold<\/font>]][[User:Caroldermoid\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ Thanks for the Welcome. I don't want to seem so incompetent, but I have never collaborated before on a Wiki project.  I found the talk page pretty intimidating.  I don't want to make work for you, but can you give me a specific project, even if just copy-editing, or a bit of research to do? I am finding myself lacking in BE BOLD lol. If I just need to watch for a month, that is cool too. TIA <font color="midnightblue" face="comic sans ms">'''[[User:Caroldermoid|<font color="midnightblue" face="comic sans ms">Carold</font>]][[User:Caroldermoid/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Caroldermoid|<font color="midnightblue" face="comic sans ms">rmoid</font>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Caroldermoid|<font color="midnightblue">talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Caroldermoid|<font color="midnightblue">contribs</font>]])</small></font> 18:35, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
534384 +++$+++ Caroldermoid +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534383 +++$+++ 534383 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.163299080E09 +++$+++ That's cool. I'll watch, then find some Wiki Boldness, lol. Thanks <font color=\"midnightblue\" face=\"comic sans ms\">'''[[User:Caroldermoid|<font color=\"midnightblue\" face=\"comic sans ms\">Carold<\/font>]][[User:Caroldermoid\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ :That's cool. I'll watch, then find some Wiki Boldness, lol. Thanks <font color="midnightblue" face="comic sans ms">'''[[User:Caroldermoid|<font color="midnightblue" face="comic sans ms">Carold</font>]][[User:Caroldermoid/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Caroldermoid|<font color="midnightblue" face="comic sans ms">rmoid</font>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Caroldermoid|<font color="midnightblue">talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Caroldermoid|<font color="midnightblue">contribs</font>]])</small></font> 18:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
534385 +++$+++  +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534383 +++$+++ 534384 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.163315640E09 +++$+++ Also I signed up as assistant overseer, If you need anything specific, just ask. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::Also I signed up as assistant overseer, If you need anything specific, just ask. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/FAQ|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 23:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
534386 +++$+++  +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534383 +++$+++ 534385 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.163318700E09 +++$+++ Thanks mate, user boxes are damn good at spreading information, and getting recruits. I'm doing a vandal patrol at the moment so I'll see you later. Thanks, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::Thanks mate, user boxes are damn good at spreading information, and getting recruits. I'm doing a vandal patrol at the moment so I'll see you later. Thanks, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/FAQ|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 00:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

272243 +++$+++ Plange +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272243 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-05 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.154838360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Plange|plange]] 21:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
272244 +++$+++ Plange +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272243 +++$+++ 272243 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.154838480E09 +++$+++ Oh, and for the Rev War one, if not from Virginia, you could also change TJ's photo with someone from your state (but of course TJ is a good representation of the Rev War in general)  +++$+++ :Oh, and for the Rev War one, if not from Virginia, you could also change TJ's photo with someone from your state (but of course TJ is a good representation of the Rev War in general) [[User:Plange|plange]] 21:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

10100 +++$+++ Astromahitis +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-02 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.267537260E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Astromahitis|Astromahitis]] ([[User talk:Astromahitis|talk]]) 05:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
10101 +++$+++ Astromahitis +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10100 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-02 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.267554660E09 +++$+++ Initialy I call you \"Dear\" and send you \"Friendly regards\" without even knowing you. You didn't write any comment about it on my talk page! You headed straight to the meat and undid my edit. Now you write on my talk page that I personally attack you which is neither the intention nor true. It seems that [[User:Omegatron\/About_me|Omegatron]] was right: \"I now know that Wikipedians rarely talk to each other unless they're complaining about something\". Anyway, I am still waiting for you, to have a discussion without grudge and offenses. Honestly.-- +++$+++ ::Initialy I call you "Dear" and send you "Friendly regards" without even knowing you. You didn't write any comment about it on my talk page! You headed straight to the meat and undid my edit. Now you write on my talk page that I personally attack you which is neither the intention nor true. It seems that [[User:Omegatron/About_me|Omegatron]] was right: "I now know that Wikipedians rarely talk to each other unless they're complaining about something". Anyway, I am still waiting for you, to have a discussion without grudge and offenses. Honestly.--[[User:Astromahitis|Astromahitis]] ([[User talk:Astromahitis|talk]]) 10:31, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
10102 +++$+++ Astromahitis +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10100 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-02 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.267599540E09 +++$+++ I didn't mean to attack you when I mentioned the matter of age. It seems that it was considered as such. \u03a4\u03b5\u03bb\u03bf\u03c2 \u03c0\u03ac\u03bd\u03c4\u03c9\u03bd, \u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03b1 \u03be\u03b5\u03c7\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03b1 \u03bb\u03bf\u03b9\u03c0\u03cc\u03bd. -- +++$+++ ::I didn't mean to attack you when I mentioned the matter of age. It seems that it was considered as such. Τελος πάντων, περασμένα ξεχασμένα λοιπόν. --[[User:Astromahitis|Astromahitis]] ([[User talk:Astromahitis|talk]]) 22:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

272245 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-06 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.154910900E09 +++$+++ I took a look at your page.  Nice work.   +++$+++ I took a look at your page.  Nice work.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 17:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
272246 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272245 +++$+++ 272245 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.154934780E09 +++$+++ Tell me exactly which design of my user page you would like to use (since I have different formats) and then I'll send it to you and you can work on it.  +++$+++ *Tell me exactly which design of my user page you would like to use (since I have different formats) and then I'll send it to you and you can work on it. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

272247 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-07 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.154944080E09 +++$+++ Take a look at your User page.  Hope you like it  +++$+++ Take a look at your User page.  Hope you like it [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:48, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
272248 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272247 +++$+++ 272247 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.154945520E09 +++$+++ Hey man, that's what friends are for.   +++$+++ *Hey man, that's what friends are for.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

10104 +++$+++ TenPoundHammer +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-23 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.269393540E09 +++$+++ <div class=\"floatleft\" style=\"margin-bottom:0\">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]<\/div>I have nominated [[Untitled Album (Anna Vissi)]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Untitled Album (Anna Vissi)]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> <span style=\"color:green\">Ten Pound Hammer<\/span>, his otters and a clue-bat \u2022 <sup>([[Special:Contributions\/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] \u2022 [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] \u2022  +++$+++ <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[Untitled Album (Anna Vissi)]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Album (Anna Vissi)]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 18:19, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
10105 +++$+++ Mike Cline +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10104 +++$+++ 10104 +++$+++ 2010-03-31 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.270076640E09 +++$+++ I closed the AfD by moving the article to your user space here: [[User:Greekboy\/Untitled Album (Anna Vissi)]].  Please do not recreate it in the article space until it meets [[WP:NALBUMS]].  Thanks-- +++$+++ : I closed the AfD by moving the article to your user space here: [[User:Greekboy/Untitled Album (Anna Vissi)]].  Please do not recreate it in the article space until it meets [[WP:NALBUMS]].  Thanks--[[User:Mike Cline|Mike Cline]] ([[User talk:Mike Cline|talk]]) 16:04, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

534395 +++$+++ Randfan +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.163386140E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Though what you did is not so random, I, on behalf of [[User:Editor at Large|E@L]], award you this barnstar for your support.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Though what you did is not so random, I, on behalf of [[User:Editor at Large|E@L]], award you this barnstar for your support. [[User:Randfan|Randfan]] 18:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
534396 +++$+++ Randfan +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534395 +++$+++ 534395 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.163390340E09 +++$+++ I should thank you.  I'm pretty sure it was you who made realize she was in trouble.   +++$+++ :I should thank you.  I'm pretty sure it was you who made realize she was in trouble.  [[User:Randfan|Randfan]] 19:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

10108 +++$+++ McDoobAU93 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10108 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-17 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.284718920E09 +++$+++ Greetings. I notice you're getting involved with a Six Flags fanboy who's uploading images for Six Flags Great Adventure's new ''[[Green Lantern (roller coaster)|Green Lantern]]''. I'm dealing with the same IP over at Six Flags Over Georgia's new ''[[Dare Devil Dive]]''. In the case of ''Green Lantern'', if this were a totally new roller coaster, I would think that the artwork would be acceptable, but since this is a relocation of an existing roller coaster that already has substantial free images, I don't think adding a copyrighted, photo-shopped image is going to help ... but that is merely my two cents.  --''' +++$+++ Greetings. I notice you're getting involved with a Six Flags fanboy who's uploading images for Six Flags Great Adventure's new ''[[Green Lantern (roller coaster)|Green Lantern]]''. I'm dealing with the same IP over at Six Flags Over Georgia's new ''[[Dare Devil Dive]]''. In the case of ''Green Lantern'', if this were a totally new roller coaster, I would think that the artwork would be acceptable, but since this is a relocation of an existing roller coaster that already has substantial free images, I don't think adding a copyrighted, photo-shopped image is going to help ... but that is merely my two cents.  --'''[[User:McDoobAU93|<span style="color:#000080">McDoob</span>]][[User talk:McDoobAU93|<span style="color:#cc5500">AU</span>]][[Special:Contributions/McDoobAU93|<span style="color:#000080">93</span>]]''' 03:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
10109 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10108 +++$+++ 10108 +++$+++ 2010-09-17 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.284719160E09 +++$+++ Yeah, those were my initial thoughts as well. But then I thought that it ''may'' be acceptable as it is portraying a new theme. But you are probably right, and there are more than enough free images to portray the ride for now. Thanks for your input!  +++$+++ :Yeah, those were my initial thoughts as well. But then I thought that it ''may'' be acceptable as it is portraying a new theme. But you are probably right, and there are more than enough free images to portray the ride for now. Thanks for your input! [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 03:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

597216 +++$+++ Frazzydee +++$+++ Maximus Rex +++$+++ 597216 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-07-30 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.091231340E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I noticed you were a sysop, so I'd like to request that you delete [[Howard Wales]].  As you can see on the article's talk page, the author was not comfortable with wikipedia using the information.  I would, however, advise that the talk page not be deleted to avoid future problems, and for archival purposes.  Thanks in advance. - +++$+++ Hi.  I noticed you were a sysop, so I'd like to request that you delete [[Howard Wales]].  As you can see on the article's talk page, the author was not comfortable with wikipedia using the information.  I would, however, advise that the talk page not be deleted to avoid future problems, and for archival purposes.  Thanks in advance. -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee]] 16:49, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
597217 +++$+++ Maximus Rex +++$+++ Maximus Rex +++$+++ 597216 +++$+++ 597216 +++$+++ 2004-07-30 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.091232120E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ :Done. [[User:Maximus Rex|Maximus Rex]] 17:02, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)

10112 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-23 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.287838920E09 +++$+++ }}  <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ }}  <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 06:02, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
10113 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10112 +++$+++ 10112 +++$+++ 2010-12-24 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.293252480E09 +++$+++ Not sure what you mean, I didn't edit anything? Maybe you have me confused with someone else?  +++$+++ :Not sure what you mean, I didn't edit anything? Maybe you have me confused with someone else? [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 20:48, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

569664 +++$+++ Krasniy +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569664 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-30 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.170228900E09 +++$+++ Hello, I was wondering what are and\/or where I can find the guidelines for linking terms to pages that don't yet exist. I presume there is some room for things that should have articles but don't yet. Thanks \u2248 +++$+++ Hello, I was wondering what are and/or where I can find the guidelines for linking terms to pages that don't yet exist. I presume there is some room for things that should have articles but don't yet. Thanks ≈[[User:Krasniy|<span style="color: #800">Krasniy</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Krasniy|t]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Krasniy|c]]</sub> 23:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
569665 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569664 +++$+++ 569664 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.170229920E09 +++$+++ Hello! I would have a look at [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Link Recovery]], [[:Wikipedia:Red link]] and [[:Wikipedia:Requested articles]] for starters.  Let me know if you have follow-up questions after looking through these - I think they are relevant to your question but I could be wrong! Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello! I would have a look at [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Link Recovery]], [[:Wikipedia:Red link]] and [[:Wikipedia:Requested articles]] for starters.  Let me know if you have follow-up questions after looking through these - I think they are relevant to your question but I could be wrong! Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

10115 +++$+++ Danjel +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10115 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-01 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.293917100E09 +++$+++ G'day. Reviewed this DYK for you, and just wanted to say great job. I have absolutely no interest in these sorts of shows, but I've got to credit you with keeping things [[WP:NPOV]] which I think a lot of editors on these sort of pages must struggle with. Crossposting to your fellow, [[User_talk:Grk1011|Grk1011]], also. -''<font face=\"Tahoma\"> +++$+++ G'day. Reviewed this DYK for you, and just wanted to say great job. I have absolutely no interest in these sorts of shows, but I've got to credit you with keeping things [[WP:NPOV]] which I think a lot of editors on these sort of pages must struggle with. Crossposting to your fellow, [[User_talk:Grk1011|Grk1011]], also. -''<font face="Tahoma">[[User:Danjel|danjel]]</font>'' ([[User_talk:Danjel|talk to me]]) 13:25, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
10116 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10115 +++$+++ 10115 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.294018140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking the time to review the page and go out of your way to congratulate us. :)  +++$+++ :Thanks for taking the time to review the page and go out of your way to congratulate us. :) [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 17:29, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

534405 +++$+++ SCZenz +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534405 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.163589720E09 +++$+++ Hi DoomsDay.  Thanks for your constructive response to my comments on the Esperanza MfD page. I doubt Esperanza will be deleted, and I hope you can follow through on your plans for reform. I took a look at Esperanza earlier today, to see what might be in need of reforming, and what stood out in particular was the userpage award.  While people are allowed to make their userpages as pretty as they want, it looks to me like the award encourages people to think of such prettifying is a good thing and a productive use of their time.  It's much better to give awards for writing articles!  Any thoughts? --  +++$+++ Hi DoomsDay.  Thanks for your constructive response to my comments on the Esperanza MfD page. I doubt Esperanza will be deleted, and I hope you can follow through on your plans for reform. I took a look at Esperanza earlier today, to see what might be in need of reforming, and what stood out in particular was the userpage award.  While people are allowed to make their userpages as pretty as they want, it looks to me like the award encourages people to think of such prettifying is a good thing and a productive use of their time.  It's much better to give awards for writing articles!  Any thoughts? -- [[User:SCZenz|SCZenz]] 03:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
534406 +++$+++ SCZenz +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534405 +++$+++ 534405 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.163590860E09 +++$+++ Cool, thanks.  I asked at [[Wikipedia talk:Esperanza\/User Page Award#Can you help me understand the purpose of this page?]] if anyone can explain why the award is more useful than it appears, so maybe that will lead to some good discussion. --  +++$+++ :Cool, thanks.  I asked at [[Wikipedia talk:Esperanza/User Page Award#Can you help me understand the purpose of this page?]] if anyone can explain why the award is more useful than it appears, so maybe that will lead to some good discussion. -- [[User:SCZenz|SCZenz]] 03:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

10122 +++$+++  Lil-unique1 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-18 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.295347020E09 +++$+++ Per [[WP:RS]] twitter is only occasionally a reliable source. Specifically [[WP:TWITTER]] says ''\" A specific tweet may be useful as a self-published, primary source.\"'' keyword being '''maybe'''. There is no rush to add music video information as it will be available from more reliable sources in due course. If there was an issue with the information never being revealed by other sources then there is a difference. However something as high profile as this will be reported properly in due course and hence I don't see the need to let down the standards of the article with a semi-reliable source. --  +++$+++ Per [[WP:RS]] twitter is only occasionally a reliable source. Specifically [[WP:TWITTER]] says ''" A specific tweet may be useful as a self-published, primary source."'' keyword being '''maybe'''. There is no rush to add music video information as it will be available from more reliable sources in due course. If there was an issue with the information never being revealed by other sources then there is a difference. However something as high profile as this will be reported properly in due course and hence I don't see the need to let down the standards of the article with a semi-reliable source. -- [[User:Lil-unique1|<font color="DarkRed">'''Lil_<font color="red">℧</font>niquℇ <font color="red">№</font>1</font>]] [[User talk: Lil-unique1|'''<font color="Black"><sup>[talk]</sup></font>''']] 02:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
10123 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10122 +++$+++ 10122 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.295348160E09 +++$+++ [[WP:TWITTER]] says \"maybe\". That also works the other way. There is no reason ''not'' to include reliably sourced information (per [[WP:RS]]) just because a source you feel is more reliable will be published later. There is no let down in standards as adding the twitter ref is well within guidelines. The \"maybe\" relates to the numbered list as seen here [[Wikipedia:RS#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves]], which this specific twitter passes. As it is her own video, she would have first hand knowledge of who is involved. Also, just a quick search in the archives of [[Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources]] reveals that the twitter issue\/question has in fact been brought up in the past, and as discussed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Identifying_reliable_sources\/Archive_27#Verified_Twitter_Accounts here], it was determined they can be used for things a Verified account says.  +++$+++ :[[WP:TWITTER]] says "maybe". That also works the other way. There is no reason ''not'' to include reliably sourced information (per [[WP:RS]]) just because a source you feel is more reliable will be published later. There is no let down in standards as adding the twitter ref is well within guidelines. The "maybe" relates to the numbered list as seen here [[Wikipedia:RS#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves]], which this specific twitter passes. As it is her own video, she would have first hand knowledge of who is involved. Also, just a quick search in the archives of [[Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources]] reveals that the twitter issue/question has in fact been brought up in the past, and as discussed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Identifying_reliable_sources/Archive_27#Verified_Twitter_Accounts here], it was determined they can be used for things a Verified account says. [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 02:56, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
10124 +++$+++  Lil-unique1 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10122 +++$+++ 10123 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.295348400E09 +++$+++ Okies in the interest of sensibility... Add the source back if you want... I won't revert. Equally I won't argue to save it if others choose to remove it. What I will say is that if a non-questionable\/non controversial source appears where there is no self-publishing issues etc then Twitter should be removed and replaced. Fair compromise? --  +++$+++ ::Okies in the interest of sensibility... Add the source back if you want... I won't revert. Equally I won't argue to save it if others choose to remove it. What I will say is that if a non-questionable/non controversial source appears where there is no self-publishing issues etc then Twitter should be removed and replaced. Fair compromise? -- [[User:Lil-unique1|<font color="DarkRed">'''Lil_<font color="red">℧</font>niquℇ <font color="red">№</font>1</font>]] [[User talk: Lil-unique1|'''<font color="Black"><sup>[talk]</sup></font>''']] 03:00, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
10125 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10122 +++$+++ 10124 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.295348700E09 +++$+++ I am completely ok with that. I have no problems and accept that there are \"more reliable\" sources out there (in terms of wiki), but as of right now this twitter is the only one existing to source the info. A different source will show up sooner or later. It just doesn't make much sense to not include information until then.  +++$+++ :::I am completely ok with that. I have no problems and accept that there are "more reliable" sources out there (in terms of wiki), but as of right now this twitter is the only one existing to source the info. A different source will show up sooner or later. It just doesn't make much sense to not include information until then. [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 03:05, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
10126 +++$+++  Lil-unique1 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10122 +++$+++ 10125 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.295348760E09 +++$+++ Fine with me. =) --  +++$+++ ::::Fine with me. =) -- [[User:Lil-unique1|<font color="DarkRed">'''Lil_<font color="red">℧</font>niquℇ <font color="red">№</font>1</font>]] [[User talk: Lil-unique1|'''<font color="Black"><sup>[talk]</sup></font>''']] 03:06, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

534411 +++$+++ Natalya +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.163644680E09 +++$+++ Doomsday, I know that you feel strongly about this issue, but you really should be more civil than that.  Saying that you no longer take someone's opinion into value, no matter how much you disagree with them, really isn't approriate.  It is absolutely fine to disagree with someone, but regardless of how much disagreement there is, everyone's opinion should be respected.  And even if you can't manage that, you should at least be [[WP:CIVIL|civil]] about it. -- [[User:Natalya|Nataly]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ Doomsday, I know that you feel strongly about this issue, but you really should be more civil than that.  Saying that you no longer take someone's opinion into value, no matter how much you disagree with them, really isn't approriate.  It is absolutely fine to disagree with someone, but regardless of how much disagreement there is, everyone's opinion should be respected.  And even if you can't manage that, you should at least be [[WP:CIVIL|civil]] about it. -- [[User:Natalya|Nataly]]<font color="green">[[User:Natalya/Esperanza|a]]</font> 18:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
534412 +++$+++ Natalya +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534411 +++$+++ 534411 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.163724060E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, you haven't lost my respect, I was just trying to give you some advice.  You're right, this is a really stressful situation.  That's why the nicer we all can be, the easier it will be.  And even if you're wondering what's happening, sometimes taking some time away from the situation can help.  -- [[User:Natalya|Nataly]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :Don't worry, you haven't lost my respect, I was just trying to give you some advice.  You're right, this is a really stressful situation.  That's why the nicer we all can be, the easier it will be.  And even if you're wondering what's happening, sometimes taking some time away from the situation can help.  -- [[User:Natalya|Nataly]]<font color="green">[[User:Natalya/Esperanza|a]]</font> 16:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

10127 +++$+++ Scapler +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-21 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.295601300E09 +++$+++ Just thought that I should point out that, by accident, you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=408440243 deleted a DYK nomination] when adding one of your own earlier this month. \u304b\u3093\u3071\u3044\uff01  +++$+++ Just thought that I should point out that, by accident, you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=408440243 deleted a DYK nomination] when adding one of your own earlier this month. かんぱい！ [[User:Scapler|Scapler]] ([[User talk:Scapler#top|talk]]) 01:15, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
10128 +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10127 +++$+++ 10127 +++$+++ 2011-01-21 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.295604000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know, I don't know how that happened. I remember I was trying to correct a spelling mistake for the DYK I reviewed, (B\xf6lkow Phoebus) and when clicking the edit link for the specific DYK, it kept redirecting me to edit Frank Freyer. I recall that after that I clicked the main edit tab at the top of the section, and fixed the sp mistake, but I guess somehow Frank Freyer must have been deleted in the process. Seems like some sort of glitch? Regardless, I am really sorry for the deletion.  +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know, I don't know how that happened. I remember I was trying to correct a spelling mistake for the DYK I reviewed, (Bölkow Phoebus) and when clicking the edit link for the specific DYK, it kept redirecting me to edit Frank Freyer. I recall that after that I clicked the main edit tab at the top of the section, and fixed the sp mistake, but I guess somehow Frank Freyer must have been deleted in the process. Seems like some sort of glitch? Regardless, I am really sorry for the deletion. [[User:Greekboy|Greekboy]] ([[User talk:Greekboy#top|talk]]) 02:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
10129 +++$+++ Scapler +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10127 +++$+++ 10128 +++$+++ 2011-01-21 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.295604540E09 +++$+++ No problem at all. What a strange little glitch. \u304b\u3093\u3071\u3044\uff01  +++$+++ ::No problem at all. What a strange little glitch. かんぱい！ [[User:Scapler|Scapler]] ([[User talk:Scapler#top|talk]]) 02:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

534416 +++$+++ Kyo cat +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534416 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.163665260E09 +++$+++ Feeling Better? <font face=\"Papyrus\">'''<span style=\"background:#000\">[[User:Kyo cat\/Esperanza|<span style=\"color:#0c0\">K<\/span>]] +++$+++ Feeling Better? <font face="Papyrus">'''<span style="background:#000">[[User:Kyo cat/Esperanza|<span style="color:#0c0">K</span>]][[User:Kyo cat|<span style="color:#f90">yo cat</span>]]</span>'''</font><sup>[[User talk:Kyo cat|(T)]]•[[Special:Contributions/Kyo cat|(C)]]</sup> 00:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
534417 +++$+++ Kyo cat +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534416 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.163666040E09 +++$+++ No prob. I help out users in thier time of misery. Just glad I helped. <font face=\"Papyrus\">'''<span style=\"background:#000\">[[User:Kyo cat\/Esperanza|<span style=\"color:#0c0\">K<\/span>]] +++$+++ ::No prob. I help out users in thier time of misery. Just glad I helped. <font face="Papyrus">'''<span style="background:#000">[[User:Kyo cat/Esperanza|<span style="color:#0c0">K</span>]][[User:Kyo cat|<span style="color:#f90">yo cat</span>]]</span>'''</font><sup>[[User talk:Kyo cat|(T)]]•[[Special:Contributions/Kyo cat|(C)]]</sup> 00:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
534418 +++$+++ Randfan +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534416 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.163666520E09 +++$+++ I didn't know you were stressed!  Feel better soon, mate!  I gotta getya somethin' to cheer you up!  +++$+++ :::I didn't know you were stressed!  Feel better soon, mate!  I gotta getya somethin' to cheer you up! [[User:Randfan|Randfan]] 00:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

263832 +++$+++ Jamoche +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-01 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.159753860E09 +++$+++ Anons can't complete AfDs, as they aren't allowed to create new articles. The usual thing when spotting those is to create the articles for them, which I'm doing now. -- +++$+++ Anons can't complete AfDs, as they aren't allowed to create new articles. The usual thing when spotting those is to create the articles for them, which I'm doing now. --[[User:Jamoche|Jamoche]] 18:51, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
263833 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263832 +++$+++ 263832 +++$+++ 2006-10-01 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.159754160E09 +++$+++ Ah, of course! Forgot about that.  +++$+++ :Ah, of course! Forgot about that. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

10132 +++$+++ Golden Sugarplum +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-11 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.302585420E09 +++$+++ An issue about unsourced statements came up weeks ago in ''[[Silent Hill (video game)|Silent Hill]]''{{'}}s article. I made a request for comment but it still hasn't been solved. Could you comment on the problem?  +++$+++ An issue about unsourced statements came up weeks ago in ''[[Silent Hill (video game)|Silent Hill]]''{{'}}s article. I made a request for comment but it still hasn't been solved. Could you comment on the problem? [[User:Golden Sugarplum|Golden Sugarplum]] ([[User talk:Golden Sugarplum|talk]]) 22:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
10133 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Greekboy +++$+++ 10132 +++$+++ 10132 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.302740160E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:16, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

613358 +++$+++ Rtc +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-13 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.221354900E09 +++$+++ Please stop abusing Popper and don't re-add this section into the article. The source you use is incompetent. Popper strongly disagreed with naturalism; in fact, his whole work initially developed as an opposition to naturalism and positivism. PS: I actually read the works of Popper. Did you? -- +++$+++ Please stop abusing Popper and don't re-add this section into the article. The source you use is incompetent. Popper strongly disagreed with naturalism; in fact, his whole work initially developed as an opposition to naturalism and positivism. PS: I actually read the works of Popper. Did you? --[[User:Rtc|rtc]] ([[User talk:Rtc|talk]]) 18:15, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
613359 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613358 +++$+++ 613358 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.221356160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up, Rtc, I've restored the info and templated the IP for vandalistic removal of properly sourced information. You're not a reliable source, TOA is recognised as a reliable source. . .  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up, Rtc, I've restored the info and templated the IP for vandalistic removal of properly sourced information. You're not a reliable source, TOA is recognised as a reliable source. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:36, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
613360 +++$+++ Rtc +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613358 +++$+++ 613359 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.221356400E09 +++$+++ The IP was me, I forgot to login. Did you read, for example, the article \"Natural Selection and Its Scientific Status\" in its entirity and not merely the quotations that were taken out of context? In this article, Popper does not, as the title and the quotation suggests, merely discuss whether natural selection \"is\" a scientific theory or not, but he discusses the underlying problems of why species look created, and that he agrees with the creationists that naturalism shows its failure here, and he explains why he thinks this is so (according to Popper, the species ''are'' created to a large degree, however not the way creationism claims they are. The creator is merely the species themselves as they existed yesterday, and evolution to higher species is partly a byproduct of their active problem solving by trial and error; apart from that he thinks that as far the interplay between mutation and natural selection is concerned, naturalists get it quite wrong, see \"evolution and the tree of knowledge\" on that issue, you can find it in the book ''objective knowledge''). And did you read \"In Search of a Better World\", chapter 1 \"Knowledge and the shaping of reality\" where Popper sharply criticizes the naturalistic dogma of the \"selfish gene\"? Did you read \"Knowledge and the Body-mind Problem\" where Popper further develops this view on evolution, and where he calls it \"the spearhead theory of evolution\"? On the issue of god: did you read \"popper on god, the lost interview\", where he speaks out against \"arrogant\" (as he calls it) atheism? The section, as it is, is not wrong (how can it be if consisting almost entirely of quotations), but heavily biased and suggestive. It is suggestive because of what it ''does not'' say, because of ignoring all the work of Popper on evolution and because of not descibing his views, but only the (compared to the rest) irrelevant fact that Popper thinks that natural selection is a scientific theory. If these facts are improbable to you, you should put your understanding of Popper to the test and you should read his works. If you also want to read a secondary source, I recommend \"The use and abuse of Sir Karl Popper\" in J. Biology and Philosophy. I generally recommend you to read more journals and books instead of relying on amateurish talk.origins archive websites. TOA is not a reliable source, it is  a naturalist think tank and not any better than a creationist website. -- +++$+++ ::The IP was me, I forgot to login. Did you read, for example, the article "Natural Selection and Its Scientific Status" in its entirity and not merely the quotations that were taken out of context? In this article, Popper does not, as the title and the quotation suggests, merely discuss whether natural selection "is" a scientific theory or not, but he discusses the underlying problems of why species look created, and that he agrees with the creationists that naturalism shows its failure here, and he explains why he thinks this is so (according to Popper, the species ''are'' created to a large degree, however not the way creationism claims they are. The creator is merely the species themselves as they existed yesterday, and evolution to higher species is partly a byproduct of their active problem solving by trial and error; apart from that he thinks that as far the interplay between mutation and natural selection is concerned, naturalists get it quite wrong, see "evolution and the tree of knowledge" on that issue, you can find it in the book ''objective knowledge''). And did you read "In Search of a Better World", chapter 1 "Knowledge and the shaping of reality" where Popper sharply criticizes the naturalistic dogma of the "selfish gene"? Did you read "Knowledge and the Body-mind Problem" where Popper further develops this view on evolution, and where he calls it "the spearhead theory of evolution"? On the issue of god: did you read "popper on god, the lost interview", where he speaks out against "arrogant" (as he calls it) atheism? The section, as it is, is not wrong (how can it be if consisting almost entirely of quotations), but heavily biased and suggestive. It is suggestive because of what it ''does not'' say, because of ignoring all the work of Popper on evolution and because of not descibing his views, but only the (compared to the rest) irrelevant fact that Popper thinks that natural selection is a scientific theory. If these facts are improbable to you, you should put your understanding of Popper to the test and you should read his works. If you also want to read a secondary source, I recommend "The use and abuse of Sir Karl Popper" in J. Biology and Philosophy. I generally recommend you to read more journals and books instead of relying on amateurish talk.origins archive websites. TOA is not a reliable source, it is  a naturalist think tank and not any better than a creationist website. --[[User:Rtc|rtc]] ([[User talk:Rtc|talk]]) 18:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
613361 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613358 +++$+++ 613360 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.221358200E09 +++$+++ See [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NPOV\/FAQ]]. .  +++$+++ :::See [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NPOV/FAQ]]. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:10, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
613362 +++$+++ Rtc +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613358 +++$+++ 613361 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.221358920E09 +++$+++ So what should I see in there? Neither may one write something into the article merely because one has a source for it (for example, if talk.origins describes Popper's views poorly and incompletely, it is not a good source to use), nor does one need to cite a source for every claim one makes (if it is knowlede you can find in the standard works on the topic without effort, it's not necessary to make a citation after each such claim). From what I have told you above you can easily check what I said. Please don't justify keeping the section of the article with a false interpretation of these policies. -- +++$+++ ::::So what should I see in there? Neither may one write something into the article merely because one has a source for it (for example, if talk.origins describes Popper's views poorly and incompletely, it is not a good source to use), nor does one need to cite a source for every claim one makes (if it is knowlede you can find in the standard works on the topic without effort, it's not necessary to make a citation after each such claim). From what I have told you above you can easily check what I said. Please don't justify keeping the section of the article with a false interpretation of these policies. --[[User:Rtc|rtc]] ([[User talk:Rtc|talk]]) 19:22, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

272278 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-22 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.164243840E09 +++$+++ Best wishes,   +++$+++ Best wishes,  [[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] 17:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
272279 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272278 +++$+++ 272278 +++$+++ 2006-11-22 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.164264600E09 +++$+++ Thanks again!  Capitals now adjusted.  There's so much to learn!!!!   +++$+++ :Thanks again!  Capitals now adjusted.  There's so much to learn!!!!  [[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] 22:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

272280 +++$+++ hamedog +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-23 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.164271980E09 +++$+++ I agree with it!--<small> +++$+++ I agree with it!--<small>[[User:Hamedog|Hamedog]]<sub>[[User talk:Hamedog|Talk]]</sub>|<sup>[[Special:Emailuser/Hamedog|@]]</sup></small> 00:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
272281 +++$+++ gwernol +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ 272280 +++$+++ 272280 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.164272220E09 +++$+++ I personally aqree too, but please refrain from this sort of edit summary in the future. It violates [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:POV]]. Its only going to inflame an already heavily contested article. While we all like to let off steam, please avoid doing so in edit summaries. Thanks,  +++$+++ :I personally aqree too, but please refrain from this sort of edit summary in the future. It violates [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:POV]]. Its only going to inflame an already heavily contested article. While we all like to let off steam, please avoid doing so in edit summaries. Thanks, [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 00:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

534425 +++$+++  +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534425 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-17 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.163752500E09 +++$+++ And I'd expand it, but I don't know what to expand it with! Guess I'll wait til inspiration strikes. :)  +++$+++ And I'd expand it, but I don't know what to expand it with! Guess I'll wait til inspiration strikes. :) [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] ([[Wikipedia:Peer review/Islam|Please peer review here.]]) 00:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
534426 +++$+++  +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534425 +++$+++ 534425 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.163752740E09 +++$+++ Sure, edit my page if you want. If it gets long enough we can move it to Wikipedia: space and make it a ''real'' essay...  +++$+++ :Sure, edit my page if you want. If it gets long enough we can move it to Wikipedia: space and make it a ''real'' essay... [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] ([[Wikipedia:Peer review/Islam|Please peer review here.]]) 00:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
534427 +++$+++  +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534425 +++$+++ 534426 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.163752920E09 +++$+++ Go for it. :)  +++$+++ ::Go for it. :) [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] ([[Wikipedia:Peer review/Islam|Please peer review here.]]) 00:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

10139 +++$+++ Severo +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10139 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-22 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.287756660E09 +++$+++ Hello, at [[User:The Anomebot2]] you noted in 2008 that bizarrely-formatted disambig pages were causing problems for importing geodata from PL wiki. There are now over [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poland#Geodata|10,000 articles]] about Polish places needing geodata, some or perhaps many of which have the data in PL wiki. I wonder if it's possible to look at this again, see if there is still a problem and if there is if there is a way to fix it? Thanks in advance,  +++$+++ Hello, at [[User:The Anomebot2]] you noted in 2008 that bizarrely-formatted disambig pages were causing problems for importing geodata from PL wiki. There are now over [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poland#Geodata|10,000 articles]] about Polish places needing geodata, some or perhaps many of which have the data in PL wiki. I wonder if it's possible to look at this again, see if there is still a problem and if there is if there is a way to fix it? Thanks in advance, [[User:Severo|Severo]]<sup>''[[User talk:Severo|T]][[Special:Contributions/Severo|C]]''</sup> 07:11, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
10140 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10139 +++$+++ 10139 +++$+++ 2010-10-22 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.287783300E09 +++$+++ I and other [[WP:POLAND]] editors can help translate messages between editors here and on pl wiki, if needed. --<sub><span style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :I and other [[WP:POLAND]] editors can help translate messages between editors here and on pl wiki, if needed. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 14:35, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
10141 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10139 +++$+++ 10140 +++$+++ 2010-10-23 11:34:00 +++$+++ 1.287858840E09 +++$+++ I have also recently performed a mass update using data from other-language Wikipedias, which copied around 6000 geocodes from other editions of Wikipedia, and should have copied many of the coordinates from the pl: Wikipedia to en:. However, the data from other Wikipedias dates back to May of this year, and many newer coordniates may remain to be copied from pl: --  +++$+++ ::I have also recently performed a mass update using data from other-language Wikipedias, which copied around 6000 geocodes from other editions of Wikipedia, and should have copied many of the coordinates from the pl: Wikipedia to en:. However, the data from other Wikipedias dates back to May of this year, and many newer coordniates may remain to be copied from pl: -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 11:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
10142 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10139 +++$+++ 10141 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.288049820E09 +++$+++ The other option of another full gmina-level disambiguation run from dump data is too much effort at the moment: it's not just a matter of re-running software, there are numerous manual checking and testing steps which would need to be repeated, and manual fixups of outliers,  in order to ensure that the input data was consistent before doing the final reconciliation run. This would take several days of work. --  +++$+++ :::The other option of another full gmina-level disambiguation run from dump data is too much effort at the moment: it's not just a matter of re-running software, there are numerous manual checking and testing steps which would need to be repeated, and manual fixups of outliers,  in order to ensure that the input data was consistent before doing the final reconciliation run. This would take several days of work. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 16:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
10143 +++$+++ Severo +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10139 +++$+++ 10142 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.288051020E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for looking at this (and completing around 10% of the job!). There does certainly seem to be a little imagination lacking when it came to naming places (how many [[D\u0105browa]]'s are there?!) which isn't something we can overcome, but, for anything we can improve here on Wikipedia that will make runs easier in the future do let us know. One question about the most recent run: did it only look at places (towns, villages etc) or anything with co-ordinate data? Thanks again,  +++$+++ ::::Thanks very much for looking at this (and completing around 10% of the job!). There does certainly seem to be a little imagination lacking when it came to naming places (how many [[Dąbrowa]]'s are there?!) which isn't something we can overcome, but, for anything we can improve here on Wikipedia that will make runs easier in the future do let us know. One question about the most recent run: did it only look at places (towns, villages etc) or anything with co-ordinate data? Thanks again, [[User:Severo|Severo]]<sup>''[[User talk:Severo|T]][[Special:Contributions/Severo|C]]''</sup> 16:57, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
10144 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10139 +++$+++ 10143 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.288052400E09 +++$+++ I looked at all en: articles where the en: article belonged to one of the Polish {{tl|coord missing}} categories, and where the pl: article pointed to by the en: article's interwiki also contained an unambiguous and well-formatted external coordinate link. A number of special cases will have got missed due to a number of shortcuts I took to make the job easier, but manual spot-checking seems to show that this bot pass has been fairly successful in catching most of the remaining cases. --  +++$+++ :::::I looked at all en: articles where the en: article belonged to one of the Polish {{tl|coord missing}} categories, and where the pl: article pointed to by the en: article's interwiki also contained an unambiguous and well-formatted external coordinate link. A number of special cases will have got missed due to a number of shortcuts I took to make the job easier, but manual spot-checking seems to show that this bot pass has been fairly successful in catching most of the remaining cases. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 17:20, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

534428 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.163918340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 22:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
534429 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534428 +++$+++ 534428 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.163918820E09 +++$+++ You're welcome!  +++$+++ :You're welcome! [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 22:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

525978 +++$+++ Rmt2m +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525978 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-05 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.149494340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help with [[Military history of the United States during World War II]], it needs to get finished badly.   +++$+++ Thanks for the help with [[Military history of the United States during World War II]], it needs to get finished badly.  [[User:Rmt2m|Rmt2m]] 00:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
525979 +++$+++ Rmt2m +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525978 +++$+++ 525978 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.149495900E09 +++$+++ Yeah I guess it does make more sense for them to be listed as \"References.\"  I've just gotten into the habit of using \"External links.\"  Everything that is listed under \"External links\" was used as a source, so it can be changed to \"References\" no problem.   +++$+++ :Yeah I guess it does make more sense for them to be listed as "References."  I've just gotten into the habit of using "External links."  Everything that is listed under "External links" was used as a source, so it can be changed to "References" no problem.  [[User:Rmt2m|Rmt2m]] 01:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
525980 +++$+++ Rmt2m +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525978 +++$+++ 525979 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.149496680E09 +++$+++ Looks better already.  One question:  Would it be better to go straight into \"Market Garden\" right after \"Overlord,\" or were there any major actions that deserve another section before \"Market Garden\"?  I can't really think of much.   +++$+++ ::Looks better already.  One question:  Would it be better to go straight into "Market Garden" right after "Overlord," or were there any major actions that deserve another section before "Market Garden"?  I can't really think of much.  [[User:Rmt2m|Rmt2m]] 01:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
525981 +++$+++ Rmt2m +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 525978 +++$+++ 525980 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.149497520E09 +++$+++ I don't think I've ever been called an expert before.  Thanks!  Thanks again for your help.   +++$+++ :::I don't think I've ever been called an expert before.  Thanks!  Thanks again for your help.  [[User:Rmt2m|Rmt2m]] 01:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

534430 +++$+++ Randfan +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-17 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163754360E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For supporting me, keeping me company, believing me, and for being my friend.  And kind, obviously.  Thanks!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For supporting me, keeping me company, believing me, and for being my friend.  And kind, obviously.  Thanks! [[User:Randfan|Randfan]] 01:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
534431 +++$+++ Randfan +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534430 +++$+++ 534430 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.163755200E09 +++$+++ No problemo!  And did you take out the #'s in your sig. so you wouldn't get vandaled again? ;)  You most certainly deserved it.  +++$+++ :No problemo!  And did you take out the #'s in your sig. so you wouldn't get vandaled again? ;)  You most certainly deserved it. [[User:Randfan|Randfan]] 01:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

10145 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10145 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-25 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.288054680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking a stab at it. [[User:Kotniski]] is our (WP:POLAND's) resident expert on locales and things such as disambig, you way want to drop him a comment on the difficulties. --<sub><span style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Thanks for taking a stab at it. [[User:Kotniski]] is our (WP:POLAND's) resident expert on locales and things such as disambig, you way want to drop him a comment on the difficulties. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 17:58, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
10146 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10145 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.288054920E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. [[User:Kotniski]] is indded the expert on this; they have already given me a great deal of help on this, by setting up the gmina bounding boxes used by the cross-correlation program. I'm now taking a look at the OpenStreetMap data set for Poland, to see if it has any data that might be of use. --  +++$+++ ::You're welcome. [[User:Kotniski]] is indded the expert on this; they have already given me a great deal of help on this, by setting up the gmina bounding boxes used by the cross-correlation program. I'm now taking a look at the OpenStreetMap data set for Poland, to see if it has any data that might be of use. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 18:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
10147 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10145 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.288202880E09 +++$+++ I've now taken a look at the OpenStreetMap data for Poland: it's in a well-thought-out XML format which is surprisingly easy to parse and analyze, but, on inspecting the data, all of the easy match-ups to Wikipedia seem to have been done already, with only partial data for the remaining 500 possible candidates for matching. --  +++$+++ :::I've now taken a look at the OpenStreetMap data for Poland: it's in a well-thought-out XML format which is surprisingly easy to parse and analyze, but, on inspecting the data, all of the easy match-ups to Wikipedia seem to have been done already, with only partial data for the remaining 500 possible candidates for matching. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 11:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
10148 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10145 +++$+++ 10145 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 09:44:00 +++$+++ 1.288025040E09 +++$+++ Can you provide any evidence for your assertions? If not, you cannot add them to the article. If you believe the article does not belong on Wikipedia, you may nominate the article for deletion using the [[WP:AFD|Articles for Deletion]] process. --  +++$+++ :Can you provide any evidence for your assertions? If not, you cannot add them to the article. If you believe the article does not belong on Wikipedia, you may nominate the article for deletion using the [[WP:AFD|Articles for Deletion]] process. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 09:44, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

534434 +++$+++ Llama man +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-17 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.163830260E09 +++$+++ What message? &mdash;[[User:Llama man|The Gr]][[User:Llama man\/Esperanza|<span style=\"color:green;\">e<\/span>]] +++$+++ What message? &mdash;[[User:Llama man|The Gr]][[User:Llama man/Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">e</span>]][[User:Llama man|at Llama]] <sup>[[User talk:Llama man|talk]]</sup> 22:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
534435 +++$+++ Llama man +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534434 +++$+++ 534434 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.163830320E09 +++$+++ Oh, never mind. &mdash;[[User:Llama man|The Gr]][[User:Llama man\/Esperanza|<span style=\"color:green;\">e<\/span>]] +++$+++ :Oh, never mind. &mdash;[[User:Llama man|The Gr]][[User:Llama man/Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">e</span>]][[User:Llama man|at Llama]] <sup>[[User talk:Llama man|talk]]</sup> 22:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

534436 +++$+++  +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.163905980E09 +++$+++ I noticed that Coffee Lounge was deleted. The thing is, you only nominated it today. It would be easy to nominate it, tell people who share your opinion to vote \"Delete\", then show an admin the \"consensus\" in favor of delete and have them delete the page before any \"Keep\" votes show up. I am trying to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]], but something doesn't smell right. [[User:Alethiophile|<font color=\"blue\">Al<\/font>]][[User:Alethiophile\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ I noticed that Coffee Lounge was deleted. The thing is, you only nominated it today. It would be easy to nominate it, tell people who share your opinion to vote "Delete", then show an admin the "consensus" in favor of delete and have them delete the page before any "Keep" votes show up. I am trying to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]], but something doesn't smell right. [[User:Alethiophile|<font color="blue">Al</font>]][[User:Alethiophile/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Alethiophile|<font color="blue">thiophile</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Alethiophile|<font color="red">1</font>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Random|<font color="green">2</font>]]</small><sub>[[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|<font color="blue">3</font>]]</sub> 19:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
534437 +++$+++  +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534436 +++$+++ 534436 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.163918460E09 +++$+++ Please be [[WP:CIVIL|civil]]. I am simply wondering why there were absolutely no \"Keep\" votes. I would have certainly voted \"Keep\", but the first time I heard about the MfD was when I tried to access the coffee lounge to try out my new signature. By that time, it was already deleted. I had no notice, except that the CL was a major reason for \"Delete\" votes in the [[WP:MFD\/EA|all-Esperanza MfD]]. No one who wasn't on the CL between early this morning and now would have known that it was under MfD. This might have kept away a significant number of voters, who simply might not have known about the MfD until it was too late.  At least some of these might have been \"Keep\" votes. The situation is analagous to the US deciding a president based on poll data from only the first hour of voting. The consensus from the first day is by no means indicative of the consensus over the proper five-day period. It seems unreasonable that the MfD was closed only one day (if that) into the comment period. [[User:Alethiophile|<font color=\"blue\">Al<\/font>]][[User:Alethiophile\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Please be [[WP:CIVIL|civil]]. I am simply wondering why there were absolutely no "Keep" votes. I would have certainly voted "Keep", but the first time I heard about the MfD was when I tried to access the coffee lounge to try out my new signature. By that time, it was already deleted. I had no notice, except that the CL was a major reason for "Delete" votes in the [[WP:MFD/EA|all-Esperanza MfD]]. No one who wasn't on the CL between early this morning and now would have known that it was under MfD. This might have kept away a significant number of voters, who simply might not have known about the MfD until it was too late.  At least some of these might have been "Keep" votes. The situation is analagous to the US deciding a president based on poll data from only the first hour of voting. The consensus from the first day is by no means indicative of the consensus over the proper five-day period. It seems unreasonable that the MfD was closed only one day (if that) into the comment period. [[User:Alethiophile|<font color="blue">Al</font>]][[User:Alethiophile/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Alethiophile|<font color="blue">thiophile</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Alethiophile|<font color="red">1</font>]]</sup><small>[[Special:Random|<font color="green">2</font>]]</small><sub>[[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|<font color="blue">3</font>]]</sub> 22:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

10149 +++$+++ WikiTome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-31 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.288562280E09 +++$+++ Thank you. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ Thank you. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WikiTome|<font color="#666600" size="3px" face="Papyrus">Wiki</font><font color="#660000" size="3px" face="Papyrus">Tome</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:WikiTome|<font color="green" size="1px">Talk</font>]]</sup></span> 14:58, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
10150 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10149 +++$+++ 10149 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.288562460E09 +++$+++ Please see http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/search?q=%2240Gbit+Ethernet%22 and http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/search?q=%22100Gbit+Ethernet%22 --  +++$+++ :Please see http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%2240Gbit+Ethernet%22 and http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22100Gbit+Ethernet%22 -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 15:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

10151 +++$+++ WikiTome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10151 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-31 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.288562400E09 +++$+++ Thank you. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ Thank you. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WikiTome|<font color="#666600" size="3px" face="Papyrus">Wiki</font><font color="#660000" size="3px" face="Papyrus">Tome</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:WikiTome|<font color="green" size="1px">Talk</font>]]</sup></span> 15:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
10152 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10151 +++$+++ 10151 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.288562460E09 +++$+++ Please see http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/search?q=%2240Gbit+Ethernet%22 and http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/search?q=%22100Gbit+Ethernet%22 --  +++$+++ :Please see http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%2240Gbit+Ethernet%22 and http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22100Gbit+Ethernet%22 -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 15:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

10153 +++$+++ EarthFurst +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10153 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-03 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.288842960E09 +++$+++ Contacting you because you started \"[[The Image (novel)]]\" article at Wikipedia. Article copied to LGBT Wikia, but has been nominated for deletion. Hope you have time to look at http:\/\/lgbt.wikia.com\/wiki\/Category_talk:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion#The_Image_.28novel.29 and post a reply there. -- +++$+++ Contacting you because you started "[[The Image (novel)]]" article at Wikipedia. Article copied to LGBT Wikia, but has been nominated for deletion. Hope you have time to look at http://lgbt.wikia.com/wiki/Category_talk:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion#The_Image_.28novel.29 and post a reply there. --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] ([[User talk:EarthFurst|talk]]) 20:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
10154 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10153 +++$+++ 10153 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.289104200E09 +++$+++ I'm fine with whatever the LGBT Wikia decides about that article. --  +++$+++ :I'm fine with whatever the LGBT Wikia decides about that article. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 21:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

10155 +++$+++ Jeremystalked +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10155 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-03 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.288843560E09 +++$+++ <b> +++$+++ <b>[[User:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#fff;background:#080;">Jeremy</span>]][[User_talk:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#080;">stalked</span>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#00a;">(law 296)</span>]]</sub></b> 21:06, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
10156 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10155 +++$+++ 10155 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.289104140E09 +++$+++ Can you be more specific about the nature of the POV you believe me to be pushing? I'm not aware of anything in my contributions that might be controversial within the context of Wikipedia's [[WP:NPOV]] policies. --  +++$+++ :Can you be more specific about the nature of the POV you believe me to be pushing? I'm not aware of anything in my contributions that might be controversial within the context of Wikipedia's [[WP:NPOV]] policies. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 21:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

10157 +++$+++ Jeremystalked +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-04 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.291517280E09 +++$+++ <b> +++$+++ <b>[[User:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#fff;background:#080;">Jeremy</span>]][[User_talk:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#080;">stalked</span>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#00a;">(law 296)</span>]]</sub></b> 18:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
10158 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10157 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.291588860E09 +++$+++ Can you provide any [[WP:V|verifiable]] cites from multiple [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to back those up? If so, you might want to add them to the article, following Wikipedia's [[WP:NPOV]] policy (remebering to bear in mind [[WP:UNDUE]]). --  +++$+++ ::Can you provide any [[WP:V|verifiable]] cites from multiple [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to back those up? If so, you might want to add them to the article, following Wikipedia's [[WP:NPOV]] policy (remebering to bear in mind [[WP:UNDUE]]). -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 14:41, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

534448 +++$+++ Zachary crimsonwolf +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534448 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-14 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.163538840E09 +++$+++ Ooh!! Thanks! It helped. A LOT. Very many thanks to you!! Cheers!!  [[User:Zachary crimsonwolf|<font color=\"black\" face=\"comic sans ms\">'''Zachary'''<\/font>]][[User talk:Zachary crimsonwolf|<font color=\"crimson\" face=\"comic sans ms\">'''crimsonwol'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ Ooh!! Thanks! It helped. A LOT. Very many thanks to you!! Cheers!!  [[User:Zachary crimsonwolf|<font color="black" face="comic sans ms">'''Zachary'''</font>]][[User talk:Zachary crimsonwolf|<font color="crimson" face="comic sans ms">'''crimsonwol'''</font>]][[User:Zachary crimsonwolf/Esperanza|<font color="green" face="comic sans ms">'''f'''</font>]] 13:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 13:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
534449 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534448 +++$+++ 534448 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.164359400E09 +++$+++ I'll second that one =). I'm sitting here as the turkey is getting cooked!--''''' +++$+++ :I'll second that one =). I'm sitting here as the turkey is getting cooked!--'''''[[User:Ed|<font color="green" face="comic sans ms">E</font><font color="blue" face="comic sans ms">d</font>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Ed|<font color="maroon" face="comic sans ms">¿Cómo estás?</font>]]</sup> 01:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

10162 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10162 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-24 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.290655560E09 +++$+++ HI I created this categry for geo coordinates. You may wish to alter the other missing from japan to kochi. If you could use the bot to add coordinates to the Japanese dams I create from J wiki this would be great.\u2666  +++$+++ HI I created this categry for geo coordinates. You may wish to alter the other missing from japan to kochi. If you could use the bot to add coordinates to the Japanese dams I create from J wiki this would be great.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 19:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
10163 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10162 +++$+++ 10162 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.291589220E09 +++$+++ Hi! [[:Category:K\u014dchi Prefecture articles missing geocoordinate data]] already exists, so that's already sorted: the bot will recognise both \"K\u014dchi\" and \"Kochi\" as spellings of the prefecture name. The Japanese dam articles sound interesting: there's not a lot of geocoding on jawiki, so I'll take a look. --  +++$+++ :Hi! [[:Category:Kōchi Prefecture articles missing geocoordinate data]] already exists, so that's already sorted: the bot will recognise both "Kōchi" and "Kochi" as spellings of the prefecture name. The Japanese dam articles sound interesting: there's not a lot of geocoding on jawiki, so I'll take a look. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 14:47, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
10164 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10162 +++$+++ 10163 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.291590120E09 +++$+++ Update: I've fixed the tags in those articles to point to [[:Category:K\u014dchi Prefecture articles missing geocoordinate data]] instead. I'll soft-redirect your category [[:Category:Kochi Prefecture articles missing geocoordinate data]] to the older category. --  +++$+++ ::Update: I've fixed the tags in those articles to point to [[:Category:Kōchi Prefecture articles missing geocoordinate data]] instead. I'll soft-redirect your category [[:Category:Kochi Prefecture articles missing geocoordinate data]] to the older category. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 15:02, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

272310 +++$+++  +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-11 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.163301000E09 +++$+++ There's apparently someone by the name-- well, IP number of [[24.190.12.249]][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/24.190.12.249] who's messing pages up with items about a non-existent \"zero heroes\" show on [[PBS]], and unnecessary items about [[Wow! Wow! Wubbzy!]], apparently a show on [[Nickelodeon (TV channel)|Nickelodeon]]. I've cleared some of those occurrences already but I need help! Can this user be blocked? --Addict 2006 19:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ There's apparently someone by the name-- well, IP number of [[24.190.12.249]][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/24.190.12.249] who's messing pages up with items about a non-existent "zero heroes" show on [[PBS]], and unnecessary items about [[Wow! Wow! Wubbzy!]], apparently a show on [[Nickelodeon (TV channel)|Nickelodeon]]. I've cleared some of those occurrences already but I need help! Can this user be blocked? --Addict 2006 19:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
272311 +++$+++ Royalguard11 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272310 +++$+++ 272310 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.163301060E09 +++$+++ The user has apparently stopped. If he continues, then you can warn the user using one of the many warnings listed at [[WP:UTM]]. If they continue to vandalize, then report them to [[WP:AIV]], and the admins will decide whether or not to take action. -[[User:Royalguard11|Royalguard11]]<small>([[User talk:Royalguard11|Talk]]\xb7[[User talk:Royalguard11\/Desk|Desk]]\xb7 +++$+++ :The user has apparently stopped. If he continues, then you can warn the user using one of the many warnings listed at [[WP:UTM]]. If they continue to vandalize, then report them to [[WP:AIV]], and the admins will decide whether or not to take action. -[[User:Royalguard11|Royalguard11]]<small>([[User talk:Royalguard11|Talk]]·[[User talk:Royalguard11/Desk|Desk]]·[[User:Royalguard11/ER|Review Me!]])</small> 19:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
272312 +++$+++  +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272310 +++$+++ 272311 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Okay, once I finish typing this, I might try to report that guy to the admins. Thanks Royalguard11 for the tip! --Addict 2006 00:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ ::Okay, once I finish typing this, I might try to report that guy to the admins. Thanks Royalguard11 for the tip! --Addict 2006 00:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

10167 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-23 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.293112980E09 +++$+++ I've reverted [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=BOAC_Flight_712&curid=16593522&diff=403801200&oldid=401453834 this edit], which placed the accident in [[Chadwell St Mary]].  +++$+++ I've reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BOAC_Flight_712&curid=16593522&diff=403801200&oldid=401453834 this edit], which placed the accident in [[Chadwell St Mary]]. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 06:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
10168 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10167 +++$+++ 10167 +++$+++ 2010-12-23 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.293156360E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I've removed the coordinates from the pl: article as well. --  +++$+++ :Thanks. I've removed the coordinates from the pl: article as well. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 18:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

10169 +++$+++ Stepheng3 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-23 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.293161100E09 +++$+++ Recently, The Anomebot2 has added a number of coordinates with <code>source:kolossus-dewiki<\/code> and invalid region codes:  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=2009_European_Curling_Championships&action=historysubmit&diff=403791752&oldid=401285925], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Autonomous_University_of_Campeche&action=historysubmit&diff=403756249&oldid=333885581], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Balsas_River&action=historysubmit&diff=403755440&oldid=378580554] ...  It looks like the first character after the hyphen is getting lost somewhere along the way. -- +++$+++ Recently, The Anomebot2 has added a number of coordinates with <code>source:kolossus-dewiki</code> and invalid region codes:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2009_European_Curling_Championships&action=historysubmit&diff=403791752&oldid=401285925], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Autonomous_University_of_Campeche&action=historysubmit&diff=403756249&oldid=333885581], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Balsas_River&action=historysubmit&diff=403755440&oldid=378580554] ...  It looks like the first character after the hyphen is getting lost somewhere along the way. --[[User:Stepheng3|Stepheng3]] ([[User talk:Stepheng3|talk]]) 19:25, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
10170 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10169 +++$+++ 10169 +++$+++ 2010-12-23 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.293162600E09 +++$+++ Do you know of a suitable list of codes I can use for this purpose? Failing that, I guess I can parse the relevant data out of [[ISO 3166-2:MX]] and similar articles, but it seems like a brute-force (and non-authoritative, because this is Wikipedia) way of doing it. In the meantime, I will stop the bot edits. --  +++$+++ :Do you know of a suitable list of codes I can use for this purpose? Failing that, I guess I can parse the relevant data out of [[ISO 3166-2:MX]] and similar articles, but it seems like a brute-force (and non-authoritative, because this is Wikipedia) way of doing it. In the meantime, I will stop the bot edits. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 19:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
10171 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10169 +++$+++ 10169 +++$+++ 2010-12-24 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.293229020E09 +++$+++ I've compiled a list of the bad ones I've seen so far. See [[User:The Anome\/pages with bad subregion codes in geotemplates]]. --  +++$+++ :I've compiled a list of the bad ones I've seen so far. See [[User:The Anome/pages with bad subregion codes in geotemplates]]. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 14:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
10172 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10169 +++$+++ 10171 +++$+++ 2010-12-24 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.293233460E09 +++$+++ I've gone over the list on that page, and I think they are probably all correctly fixed now. --  +++$+++ ::I've gone over the list on that page, and I think they are probably all correctly fixed now. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 15:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
10173 +++$+++ Stepheng3 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10169 +++$+++ 10172 +++$+++ 2010-12-24 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.293257220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your work on this.  I don't have access to an authoritative list of region codes; I discovered the errors while working through [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~dispenser\/view\/File_viewer#log:coord-enwiki.log Dispenser's daily report].  Best regards, -- +++$+++ :::Thanks for your work on this.  I don't have access to an authoritative list of region codes; I discovered the errors while working through [http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/view/File_viewer#log:coord-enwiki.log Dispenser's daily report].  Best regards, --[[User:Stepheng3|Stepheng3]] ([[User talk:Stepheng3|talk]]) 22:07, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
10174 +++$+++ Stepheng3 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10169 +++$+++ 10173 +++$+++ 2010-12-24 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.293259500E09 +++$+++ The bot has also added coordinates with <code>region:XA<\/code>:  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=HMHS_Rewa&action=historysubmit&diff=403799112&oldid=371815921], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=HMAT_Wandilla&action=historysubmit&diff=403799295&oldid=370735106], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=German_submarine_U-627&action=historysubmit&diff=403765834&oldid=359500649]. -- +++$+++ ::::The bot has also added coordinates with <code>region:XA</code>:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMHS_Rewa&action=historysubmit&diff=403799112&oldid=371815921], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMAT_Wandilla&action=historysubmit&diff=403799295&oldid=370735106], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=German_submarine_U-627&action=historysubmit&diff=403765834&oldid=359500649]. --[[User:Stepheng3|Stepheng3]] ([[User talk:Stepheng3|talk]]) 22:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
10175 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10169 +++$+++ 10174 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 12:56:00 +++$+++ 1.293310560E09 +++$+++ Interesting. XA is part of the private use area in ISO 3166-2, and seems to be being used here to mean \"ocean\", \"international waters\" or similar. Since it isn't an official code, I'll suppress it from my bot edits. --  +++$+++ :::::Interesting. XA is part of the private use area in ISO 3166-2, and seems to be being used here to mean "ocean", "international waters" or similar. Since it isn't an official code, I'll suppress it from my bot edits. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 12:56, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
10176 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10169 +++$+++ 10174 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.293311280E09 +++$+++ ''Update'': I've now found and fixed the remaining 10 of the 15 region:XA entries added by my recent bot run. --  +++$+++ :::::''Update'': I've now found and fixed the remaining 10 of the 15 region:XA entries added by my recent bot run. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 13:08, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
10177 +++$+++ Stepheng3 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10169 +++$+++ 10176 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.293347280E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  On enwiki at least we use region:XZ for international waters.  But if we're unsure how the code is used, then probably best to suppress it as you've done.  Merry Christmas! \u2014 +++$+++ ::::::Thanks.  On enwiki at least we use region:XZ for international waters.  But if we're unsure how the code is used, then probably best to suppress it as you've done.  Merry Christmas! —[[User:Stepheng3|Stepheng3]] ([[User talk:Stepheng3|talk]]) 23:08, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

263839 +++$+++ Rosejpalmer +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-07 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.160271240E09 +++$+++ Hello, I saw your vote to keep the article, [[Lee Crompton]]. I have investigated his authorship and found a few facts that I think may convince you to reconsider your vote.  Would you please check at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Lee Crompton]] and consider adding a further comment?  +++$+++ Hello, I saw your vote to keep the article, [[Lee Crompton]]. I have investigated his authorship and found a few facts that I think may convince you to reconsider your vote.  Would you please check at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Crompton]] and consider adding a further comment? [[User:Rosejpalmer|Rosejpalmer]] 18:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
263840 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263839 +++$+++ 263839 +++$+++ 2006-10-12 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.160703300E09 +++$+++ Oh, I see that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bat_out_of_Hell_III:_The_Monster_Is_Loose&diff=prev&oldid=77950657 this] is the statement you want in. You will see that the article employs some comprehensive citation standards. Please try to follow them when adding claims like that. For example, which date can the relevant blog entry be found under?  +++$+++ :Oh, I see that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bat_out_of_Hell_III:_The_Monster_Is_Loose&diff=prev&oldid=77950657 this] is the statement you want in. You will see that the article employs some comprehensive citation standards. Please try to follow them when adding claims like that. For example, which date can the relevant blog entry be found under? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

524081 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-10 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.186784880E09 +++$+++ ...for dealing with the [attack]. I owe you one!  +++$+++ ...for dealing with the [attack]. I owe you one! [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 15:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
524082 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524081 +++$+++ 524081 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.186789920E09 +++$+++ That's called [[meatball:DefendEachOther]]. And [[Wikipedia:Administrator|the mop]], of course. :-) -- +++$+++ : That's called [[meatball:DefendEachOther]]. And [[Wikipedia:Administrator|the mop]], of course. :-) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

534463 +++$+++ Wikizach +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-02 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.165058880E09 +++$+++ Should we hold a vote on disputed proposals for charter reform?  +++$+++ Should we hold a vote on disputed proposals for charter reform? [[User:Wikizach|<font color="red">Wiki</font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]Zach| [[User talk:Wikizach|<font color="#461B7E">talk</font>]] 03:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
534464 +++$+++ GuyDoe +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534463 +++$+++ 534463 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.166080020E09 +++$+++ I was editing some stuff recently from a differnt computer and 1 i couldn't log on and 2 someone kept sending me cookies. +++$+++ :I was editing some stuff recently from a differnt computer and 1 i couldn't log on and 2 someone kept sending me cookies.[[User:GuyDoe|GuyDoe]] 23:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

10178 +++$+++ MilborneOne +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10178 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-23 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.293162480E09 +++$+++ Hello, Anomebot2 is adding co-ords to aircraft articles which is causing a bit of effort to undo all the time. Any chance of stopping it adding co-ords to things like aircraft that do not need it, thanks.  +++$+++ Hello, Anomebot2 is adding co-ords to aircraft articles which is causing a bit of effort to undo all the time. Any chance of stopping it adding co-ords to things like aircraft that do not need it, thanks. [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 19:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
10179 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10178 +++$+++ 10178 +++$+++ 2010-12-23 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.293162600E09 +++$+++ Yes, I can do that. Can you give me some examples? I can do that in the bot heuristics, once I've done the work above to validate the region codes. --  +++$+++ :Yes, I can do that. Can you give me some examples? I can do that in the bot heuristics, once I've done the work above to validate the region codes. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 19:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
10180 +++$+++ MilborneOne +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10178 +++$+++ 10179 +++$+++ 2010-12-23 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.293162720E09 +++$+++ Understood, thanks.  +++$+++ ::Understood, thanks. [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 19:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
10181 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10178 +++$+++ 10180 +++$+++ 2010-12-23 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.293163020E09 +++$+++ I'd greatly appreciate it if you could provide me with two or three diffs of the bad edits, so I can double-check what's going on by hand. --  +++$+++ :::I'd greatly appreciate it if you could provide me with two or three diffs of the bad edits, so I can double-check what's going on by hand. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 19:57, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
10182 +++$+++ Fnlayson +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10178 +++$+++ 10181 +++$+++ 2010-12-23 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.293166200E09 +++$+++ Here are 3 aircraft articles and 1 ship: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sikorsky_S-76&action=historysubmit&diff=403912905&oldid=403169766], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sikorsky_X2&action=historysubmit&diff=403913069&oldid=403019758], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=McDonnell_Douglas_F-15_Eagle&action=historysubmit&diff=403763654&oldid=403366766]. & [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=USS_Enterprise_%28CVN-65%29&action=historysubmit&diff=403798765&oldid=402372660]. - +++$+++ :::* Here are 3 aircraft articles and 1 ship: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sikorsky_S-76&action=historysubmit&diff=403912905&oldid=403169766], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sikorsky_X2&action=historysubmit&diff=403913069&oldid=403019758], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=McDonnell_Douglas_F-15_Eagle&action=historysubmit&diff=403763654&oldid=403366766]. & [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Enterprise_%28CVN-65%29&action=historysubmit&diff=403798765&oldid=402372660]. -[[User:Fnlayson|fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 20:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
10183 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10178 +++$+++ 10181 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.293748020E09 +++$+++ OK. I'm going to start by investigating the aircraft ones, and then move on to ships later. [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=Aircraft_by_manufacturer&basedeep=3&mode=ts&templates=coord|coord+missing&go=Scan&format=wiki&userlang=en This CatScan search] (edited [[User:The Anome\/Aircraft coord catscan results 2010-12-30|results]]) should find the entries that have been added mistakenly to aircraft articles so far. It's not as simple as it might seem: some air accidents are listed under aircraft subcategories, but are valid candidates for coordinates, so I can't just use the keyword \"aircraft\" to filter these. I'll think about it more, and try to come up with a better heuristic. --  +++$+++ ::::OK. I'm going to start by investigating the aircraft ones, and then move on to ships later. [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=Aircraft_by_manufacturer&basedeep=3&mode=ts&templates=coord|coord+missing&go=Scan&format=wiki&userlang=en This CatScan search] (edited [[User:The Anome/Aircraft coord catscan results 2010-12-30|results]]) should find the entries that have been added mistakenly to aircraft articles so far. It's not as simple as it might seem: some air accidents are listed under aircraft subcategories, but are valid candidates for coordinates, so I can't just use the keyword "aircraft" to filter these. I'll think about it more, and try to come up with a better heuristic. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 14:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10184 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10178 +++$+++ 10181 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.293749640E09 +++$+++ <code>\"aircraft\" and not (\"accidents\" or \"incidents\")<\/code> is ''nearly'' enough to do it, but misses some cases of individual aircraft that are on public display. More to come. --  +++$+++ ::::<code>"aircraft" and not ("accidents" or "incidents")</code> is ''nearly'' enough to do it, but misses some cases of individual aircraft that are on public display. More to come. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 14:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

613366 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-15 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.221542340E09 +++$+++ He once denied that some anonymous edits that I believed were his could have been made by him, by leaving me an anonymous message using a different IP address. He has now admitted that he has a dynamic IP address. Thanks. \u2013 +++$+++ He once denied that some anonymous edits that I believed were his could have been made by him, by leaving me an anonymous message using a different IP address. He has now admitted that he has a dynamic IP address. Thanks. –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 22:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
613367 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613366 +++$+++ 613366 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.221583500E09 +++$+++ All the edits from the anon were to do with this, including personal attacks, so I've given it a brief block, and have given IBW some advice. No doubt you'll keep in touch. One thing I noticed was that the info IBW added which has been kept is unreferenced, and referencing for the article could be improved. .  +++$+++ :All the edits from the anon were to do with this, including personal attacks, so I've given it a brief block, and have given IBW some advice. No doubt you'll keep in touch. One thing I noticed was that the info IBW added which has been kept is unreferenced, and referencing for the article could be improved. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
613368 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613366 +++$+++ 613367 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.221583860E09 +++$+++ Thanks. There is strong evidence of socking by I B Wright, which I'm currently collating. \u2013 +++$+++ ::Thanks. There is strong evidence of socking by I B Wright, which I'm currently collating. –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 09:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
613369 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613366 +++$+++ 613367 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 10:42:00 +++$+++ 1.221586920E09 +++$+++ I've submitted a sockpuppetry report at [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/I B Wright]]. \u2013 +++$+++ ::I've submitted a sockpuppetry report at [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/I B Wright]]. –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 10:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
613370 +++$+++ I B Wright +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613366 +++$+++ 613369 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.221588540E09 +++$+++ It is hard to avoid edit wars on an open forum such as this, but I have probably endured more vitriol from Signalhead in two edits than I have endured in the rest of Wikipedia put together.  That he is having a problem with another user comes as no surprise.   +++$+++ :::It is hard to avoid edit wars on an open forum such as this, but I have probably endured more vitriol from Signalhead in two edits than I have endured in the rest of Wikipedia put together.  That he is having a problem with another user comes as no surprise.  [[User:I B Wright|I B Wright]] ([[User talk:I B Wright|talk]]) 11:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
613371 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613366 +++$+++ 613370 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 11:13:00 +++$+++ 1.221588780E09 +++$+++ Unsourced information can be aggressively deleted, per [[WP:V]], and the way to resolve things is talk page discussion, not a succession of IP socks. You're aware of the report on alleged sockpuppetry, don't do it. .  +++$+++ ::::Unsourced information can be aggressively deleted, per [[WP:V]], and the way to resolve things is talk page discussion, not a succession of IP socks. You're aware of the report on alleged sockpuppetry, don't do it. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 11:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
613372 +++$+++ I B Wright +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613366 +++$+++ 613371 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.221589080E09 +++$+++ I am aware of the report, and as I have responded to Signalhead, it is tenuous at best.  Signalhead seems to be persuing a vendetta against someone else he has had a problem with and somehow assumed it's me.  As I have pointed out the response to the nature of the edit conflict (if you could call it that) is hardly proportionate.  +++$+++ :::::I am aware of the report, and as I have responded to Signalhead, it is tenuous at best.  Signalhead seems to be persuing a vendetta against someone else he has had a problem with and somehow assumed it's me.  As I have pointed out the response to the nature of the edit conflict (if you could call it that) is hardly proportionate. [[User:I B Wright|I B Wright]] ([[User talk:I B Wright|talk]]) 11:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

272328 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.172300880E09 +++$+++ Whatever warnings he did place on us weren't subst'ed either. -- +++$+++ Whatever warnings he did place on us weren't subst'ed either. --[[User:Addict 2006|Addict]] [[User talk:Addict 2006|2006]] 23:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
272329 +++$+++ Robotman1974 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272328 +++$+++ 272328 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.172301900E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about that user, if he\/she keeps it up they're on their way to being blocked.  Any experienced editor will be able to tell from looking at our contributions that we aren't' the ones vandalising.  Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism to my talk page btw. ;)  +++$+++ :Don't worry about that user, if he/she keeps it up they're on their way to being blocked.  Any experienced editor will be able to tell from looking at our contributions that we aren't' the ones vandalising.  Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism to my talk page btw. ;) [[User:Robotman1974|Robotman]][[User talk:Robotman1974|<sup>1974</sup>]] 23:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

10185 +++$+++ MilborneOne +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10185 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-30 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.293750360E09 +++$+++ Appreciate your efforts on this Anome, if it turns out we have have a few articles that need hand reverting it is not a huge problem as you say accidents should have coords and individual aircraft that still exist (although we dont have that many of them).  +++$+++ Appreciate your efforts on this Anome, if it turns out we have have a few articles that need hand reverting it is not a huge problem as you say accidents should have coords and individual aircraft that still exist (although we dont have that many of them). [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 15:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10186 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10185 +++$+++ 10185 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.293759060E09 +++$+++ <code>\"aircraft\" and not (\"accidents\" or \"incidents\" or \"individual\")<\/code> nails it for all the cases I've seen so far. I've added this to the bot code, and will now clean up the existing outliers by hand. Next, ships. --  +++$+++ :<code>"aircraft" and not ("accidents" or "incidents" or "individual")</code> nails it for all the cases I've seen so far. I've added this to the bot code, and will now clean up the existing outliers by hand. Next, ships. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 17:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10187 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10185 +++$+++ 10186 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.293760680E09 +++$+++ I haven't seen any examples of bad ship edits yet: the one you cited, the USS Enterprise CVN-65, is correct, as that appears to be the current at least semi-permanent, and possibly final, location of that particular ship. If you can show me some bad ship edits, I'd be happy to hunt down other similar examples and fix them, in the same way as the above. --  +++$+++ ::I haven't seen any examples of bad ship edits yet: the one you cited, the USS Enterprise CVN-65, is correct, as that appears to be the current at least semi-permanent, and possibly final, location of that particular ship. If you can show me some bad ship edits, I'd be happy to hunt down other similar examples and fix them, in the same way as the above. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 17:58, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

272330 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-02 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.172823180E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm definitely not sure. If I do make an improved version, I'd rather upload it to Wikipedia instead of WM Commons... [[WP:BOLD|Though I should be bold]], I don't really feel comfortable uploading to Commons because that would mean someone'd have to transfer that back to Wikipedia... Any suggestions? -- +++$+++ Well, I'm definitely not sure. If I do make an improved version, I'd rather upload it to Wikipedia instead of WM Commons... [[WP:BOLD|Though I should be bold]], I don't really feel comfortable uploading to Commons because that would mean someone'd have to transfer that back to Wikipedia... Any suggestions? --[[User:Addict 2006|Addict]] [[User talk:Addict 2006|2006]] 00:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
272331 +++$+++ GofG  +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272330 +++$+++ 272330 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.172823300E09 +++$+++ Generally, without knowing anything about your circumstances, I would upload to Commons. :)  +++$+++ :Generally, without knowing anything about your circumstances, I would upload to Commons. :) [[User:GofG | GofG]] [[User talk:GofG|<sub>|</sub><sup>|</sup><sub>|</sub>]] [[Special:Contributions/GofG | Contribs]] 00:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

10188 +++$+++ MilborneOne +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10188 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-30 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.293761340E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=HMS_Tactician_%28P314%29&diff=next&oldid=384794730] two ships (well one ship and one submarine - both scrapped)   +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Tactician_%28P314%29&diff=next&oldid=384794730] two ships (well one ship and one submarine - both scrapped)  [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 18:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10189 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10188 +++$+++ 10188 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.293763620E09 +++$+++ ''Update'': I've finished my review of the geocoded aircraft articles that seemed worth a second look, see [[User:The Anome\/Aircraft coord catscan results 2010-12-30]]. --  +++$+++ :''Update'': I've finished my review of the geocoded aircraft articles that seemed worth a second look, see [[User:The Anome/Aircraft coord catscan results 2010-12-30]]. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 18:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10190 +++$+++ MilborneOne +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10188 +++$+++ 10189 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.293764520E09 +++$+++ Looks OK - not a big fan of inline coords they are very distracting in the text and a bit indiscriminate but I understand that is not your problem and not related to the work the bot is doing.  +++$+++ ::Looks OK - not a big fan of inline coords they are very distracting in the text and a bit indiscriminate but I understand that is not your problem and not related to the work the bot is doing. [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 19:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10191 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10188 +++$+++ 10190 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.293765360E09 +++$+++ By the way, since you're online at the moment, I wonder if you could do me a favor and take a look at the geobox for [[El Hondo]], which seems completely broken? --  +++$+++ :::By the way, since you're online at the moment, I wonder if you could do me a favor and take a look at the geobox for [[El Hondo]], which seems completely broken? -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 19:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10192 +++$+++ MilborneOne +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10188 +++$+++ 10191 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.293766260E09 +++$+++ Dont think it has ever worked some of the fields are not in the template not even coordinates, I will have a dig around and see if anything can be done.  +++$+++ ::::Dont think it has ever worked some of the fields are not in the template not even coordinates, I will have a dig around and see if anything can be done. [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 19:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10193 +++$+++ MilborneOne +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10188 +++$+++ 10191 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.293766920E09 +++$+++ El Hondo fixed.  +++$+++ ::::El Hondo fixed. [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 19:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10194 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10188 +++$+++ 10193 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.293780720E09 +++$+++ Thank you! --  +++$+++ :::::Thank you! -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 23:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

534477 +++$+++ NeoFreak +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-30 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.167548580E09 +++$+++ She's an adult, it's best to leave it be and not feed the trolls. I wouldn't think she needs to be shielded, she can do with it what she pleases. I've said what I'm going to say, I'm not getting involved in this, do what you want. Cheers.  +++$+++ She's an adult, it's best to leave it be and not feed the trolls. I wouldn't think she needs to be shielded, she can do with it what she pleases. I've said what I'm going to say, I'm not getting involved in this, do what you want. Cheers. [[User:NeoFreak|NeoFreak]] 23:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
534478 +++$+++ NeoFreak +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534477 +++$+++ 534477 +++$+++ 2006-12-30 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.167548760E09 +++$+++ No worries. I just find that the more attention something like that is given the bigger it gets. Later.  +++$+++ :No worries. I just find that the more attention something like that is given the bigger it gets. Later. [[User:NeoFreak|NeoFreak]] 23:06, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

272334 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-02 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.172831580E09 +++$+++ Alright. Thanks. Oh, and I'll exempt [[:Image:Don't abbreviate as Wiki.png|the Wiki\/pedia abbreviation]] this time because a specific one is stated. -- +++$+++ Alright. Thanks. Oh, and I'll exempt [[:Image:Don't abbreviate as Wiki.png|the Wiki/pedia abbreviation]] this time because a specific one is stated. --[[User:Addict 2006|Addict]] [[User talk:Addict 2006|2006]] 02:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
272335 +++$+++ Xaosflux +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272334 +++$+++ 272334 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.172907180E09 +++$+++ Looks good, thanks! \u2014  +++$+++ :Looks good, thanks! — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 23:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
272336 +++$+++ Xaosflux +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272334 +++$+++ 272334 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.172926200E09 +++$+++ OOps, thanks! Got it. \u2014  +++$+++ :OOps, thanks! Got it. — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 04:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

534482 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.168591080E09 +++$+++ Well, there was a reason I wanted deletion, despite what Carcharoth says. I think Ed just wants to keep the path open for it to come back, which is annoying for all of us who has to guard it. *Sigh* Oh, well, back to regular work...  +++$+++ Well, there was a reason I wanted deletion, despite what Carcharoth says. I think Ed just wants to keep the path open for it to come back, which is annoying for all of us who has to guard it. *Sigh* Oh, well, back to regular work... [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 00:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
534483 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534482 +++$+++ 534482 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.168591560E09 +++$+++ Basically, after the deletion went through, a whole bunch of people started agitating for the restoration of pages. It went back and forth with the comments getting more and more acerbic until Carcharoth lost his temper and suggested a cooling off period on the MfD talkpage. Ed seems to have taken this as law and is insisting on putting it on the main template as it means something more than one person's suggestion. Which doesn't, but if it'll give me a month off from this protracted nonsense, I'll put up with it. Anything else you haven't caught up on? :)  +++$+++ :Basically, after the deletion went through, a whole bunch of people started agitating for the restoration of pages. It went back and forth with the comments getting more and more acerbic until Carcharoth lost his temper and suggested a cooling off period on the MfD talkpage. Ed seems to have taken this as law and is insisting on putting it on the main template as it means something more than one person's suggestion. Which doesn't, but if it'll give me a month off from this protracted nonsense, I'll put up with it. Anything else you haven't caught up on? :) [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 00:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
534484 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534482 +++$+++ 534483 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.168592040E09 +++$+++ Asking Jimbo for his thoughts on the ongoing squabbles over Esperanza's deletion might be a good idea. It might serve to give us all some clarity on the situation, like he did over the Brian Peppers debacle.  +++$+++ ::Asking Jimbo for his thoughts on the ongoing squabbles over Esperanza's deletion might be a good idea. It might serve to give us all some clarity on the situation, like he did over the Brian Peppers debacle. [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 00:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
534485 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534482 +++$+++ 534484 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.168592640E09 +++$+++ Well, I suggested asking for a comment rather than a binding decision, but that's alright. A case of wait and see now, I guess. I'm going to bed. Night!  +++$+++ :::Well, I suggested asking for a comment rather than a binding decision, but that's alright. A case of wait and see now, I guess. I'm going to bed. Night! [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 01:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

394915 +++$+++ Jtdirl +++$+++ Ams80 +++$+++ 394915 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ And again, sorry for taking up space but given what The Cunctator wrote above and what it revealed about his ''real'' motivation it is worth clarifying. lol  +++$+++ And again, sorry for taking up space but given what The Cunctator wrote above and what it revealed about his ''real'' motivation it is worth clarifying. lol [[User:Jtdirl|ÉÍREman]] 22:48 May 10, 2003 (UTC)
394916 +++$+++ Ams80 +++$+++ Ams80 +++$+++ 394915 +++$+++ 394915 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Hi guys, perhaps I could have been clearer. What I meant to say was that I understood why Jtdirl thought there should be two articles, not that I agreed that there should be two articles. I'm still undecided as to what should and shouldn't be in the [[Communist state]] article, I'm just a bit surprised that this dispute, which seems to be going essentially  nowhere, hasn't been sorted out yet. I'm trying to stay out of it all as I don't know nearly enough about the details to add anything useful. And I'm sulking because my beloved [[West Ham United F.C.|West Ham]] have just been [[First Division (English Football)|relegated]] from the [[FA Premier league|Premier league]]. Woe is me --  +++$+++ :Hi guys, perhaps I could have been clearer. What I meant to say was that I understood why Jtdirl thought there should be two articles, not that I agreed that there should be two articles. I'm still undecided as to what should and shouldn't be in the [[Communist state]] article, I'm just a bit surprised that this dispute, which seems to be going essentially  nowhere, hasn't been sorted out yet. I'm trying to stay out of it all as I don't know nearly enough about the details to add anything useful. And I'm sulking because my beloved [[West Ham United F.C.|West Ham]] have just been [[First Division (English Football)|relegated]] from the [[FA Premier league|Premier league]]. Woe is me -- [[User:Ams80|Ams80]] 18:24 May 11, 2003 (UTC)

272340 +++$+++ Yume no Kishi +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272340 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-06 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.173188340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">夢の騎士</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">Yume no Kishi - Talk</font>]]</sup> 05:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
272341 +++$+++ Yume no Kishi +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272340 +++$+++ 272340 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.173191820E09 +++$+++ If the vandal is some kid (like the one who wrote the \"Falkor will eat you face\" stupidity), the warnings are absolutely useless. And they usually don't vandalize more than one or two articles. (Seriously, what's so entertaining in adding stupidity to random articles?..) Anyway, I ''badly'' need to get rid of my kindness... apparently... (OK, I'll stop writing random stuff on your talk page.)  +++$+++ :If the vandal is some kid (like the one who wrote the "Falkor will eat you face" stupidity), the warnings are absolutely useless. And they usually don't vandalize more than one or two articles. (Seriously, what's so entertaining in adding stupidity to random articles?..) Anyway, I ''badly'' need to get rid of my kindness... apparently... (OK, I'll stop writing random stuff on your talk page.) [[User:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">夢の騎士</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">Yume no Kishi - Talk</font>]]</sup> 06:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

10197 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10197 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-30 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.293758940E09 +++$+++ Hi. Just wondering why <nowiki>{{coord|18|31|N|91|26|W|source:kolossus-eowiki|display=title}}<\/nowiki> has been added by your bot to [[Carmen]], which is an opera, not a place.  Or am I missing something?  Best. --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ Hi. Just wondering why <nowiki>{{coord|18|31|N|91|26|W|source:kolossus-eowiki|display=title}}</nowiki> has been added by your bot to [[Carmen]], which is an opera, not a place.  Or am I missing something?  Best. --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 17:29, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10198 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10197 +++$+++ 10197 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.293759480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for spotting that: it's clearly an error, and I can't really see where the coordinates might have come from within the Kolossus dump: I can't see any trace of it in the eo: article. I've now added operas to the class of creative works to which my bot will no longer add geocodes. And, while I'm at it, poems as well, making my category keyword block list for this now <code>[\"songs\", \"albums\", \"novels\", \"stories\", \"anthems\", \"musicals\", \"poems\", \"books\", \"plays\", \"films\", \"movies\", \"novellas\", \"documentaries\", \"operas\"]<\/code> --  +++$+++ :Thanks for spotting that: it's clearly an error, and I can't really see where the coordinates might have come from within the Kolossus dump: I can't see any trace of it in the eo: article. I've now added operas to the class of creative works to which my bot will no longer add geocodes. And, while I'm at it, poems as well, making my category keyword block list for this now <code>["songs", "albums", "novels", "stories", "anthems", "musicals", "poems", "books", "plays", "films", "movies", "novellas", "documentaries", "operas"]</code> -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 17:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10199 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10197 +++$+++ 10198 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.293760260E09 +++$+++ Found it. It was a bad interwiki from http:\/\/eo.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Carmen_%28komunumo_en_Campeche%29 . --  +++$+++ ::Found it. It was a bad interwiki from http://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmen_%28komunumo_en_Campeche%29 . -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 17:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10200 +++$+++ GuillaumeTell +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10197 +++$+++ 10199 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.293760920E09 +++$+++ Interesting!  Thanks for disentangling.  I bunged the coord into Google maps, and got a location in [[Newcastle upon Tyne]][http:\/\/maps.google.co.uk\/maps?hl=en&rlz=1T4SUNC_en___GB365&q=coord%7C18%7C31%7CN%7C91%7C26%7CW%7C&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wl]!  Mexico looks like a more appropriate place. --<font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ :::Interesting!  Thanks for disentangling.  I bunged the coord into Google maps, and got a location in [[Newcastle upon Tyne]][http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&rlz=1T4SUNC_en___GB365&q=coord%7C18%7C31%7CN%7C91%7C26%7CW%7C&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wl]!  Mexico looks like a more appropriate place. --<font color="forestgreen">[[User:GuillaumeTell|'''Guillaume''']]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:GuillaumeTell|''Tell'']]</font> 18:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10201 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10197 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.293778320E09 +++$+++ Argh! Please accept my apologies. Unfortunately, it's pretty much impossible to make 6000+ bot edits and not have the bot make the occasional nonsense edit, particularly when it's taking human-entered data from one wiki and adding it to another. Thanks for correcting both of these: I'll take a look, and add heuristics to the bot to make sure similar errors do not happen in future. --  +++$+++ :::::Argh! Please accept my apologies. Unfortunately, it's pretty much impossible to make 6000+ bot edits and not have the bot make the occasional nonsense edit, particularly when it's taking human-entered data from one wiki and adding it to another. Thanks for correcting both of these: I'll take a look, and add heuristics to the bot to make sure similar errors do not happen in future. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 22:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10202 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10197 +++$+++ 10200 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.293778680E09 +++$+++ OK, \"sports\" and \"ingredients\" are now added to the bot's category keyword blacklist. --  +++$+++ ::::OK, "sports" and "ingredients" are now added to the bot's category keyword blacklist. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 22:58, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10203 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10197 +++$+++ 10202 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.293779760E09 +++$+++ I forgive Anomebot, as long as it continues to get better.  The concept is a nice one.   +++$+++ :::::I forgive Anomebot, as long as it continues to get better.  The concept is a nice one.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 23:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10204 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10197 +++$+++ 10203 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.293780600E09 +++$+++ It will keep on getting better, I promise, and I have lots of other cool geodata stuff on the way. Also: I've just added <code>\"ballets\"<\/code> and <code>\"treaties\"<\/code> to the list of things it won't geocode. --  +++$+++ ::::::It will keep on getting better, I promise, and I have lots of other cool geodata stuff on the way. Also: I've just added <code>"ballets"</code> and <code>"treaties"</code> to the list of things it won't geocode. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 23:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10205 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10197 +++$+++ 10203 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.293781260E09 +++$+++ And <code>\"firms\"<\/code> --  +++$+++ ::::::And <code>"firms"</code> -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 23:41, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

272344 +++$+++ Yume no Kishi +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272344 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.173563340E09 +++$+++ Hey, thank you! (And why didn't I know about these cute \"smiling\" templates?.. I need to examine Wiki-templates better...) Yeah, I'm growing old... ^_^ maybe even too old to watch ''Tokyo Mew Mew'', but it's already too late to stop. ^_^;;;  +++$+++ Hey, thank you! (And why didn't I know about these cute "smiling" templates?.. I need to examine Wiki-templates better...) Yeah, I'm growing old... ^_^ maybe even too old to watch ''Tokyo Mew Mew'', but it's already too late to stop. ^_^;;; [[User:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">夢の騎士</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">Yume no Kishi - Talk</font>]]</sup> 13:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
272345 +++$+++ Yume no Kishi +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272344 +++$+++ 272344 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.173564840E09 +++$+++ Actually, I didn't even know about TMM until I eventually came across MMP Uncensored. (I liked to read about all these \"killed\" English-dubbed anime series, just for fun.) After reading a few comparisons, I realized that this thing reminds me very much of [[Sailor Moon|something I really like]]. So I came to the conclusion that I would probably like TMM, too, downloaded the thing and watched it... Yes, I liked it, too!  +++$+++ :Actually, I didn't even know about TMM until I eventually came across MMP Uncensored. (I liked to read about all these "killed" English-dubbed anime series, just for fun.) After reading a few comparisons, I realized that this thing reminds me very much of [[Sailor Moon|something I really like]]. So I came to the conclusion that I would probably like TMM, too, downloaded the thing and watched it... Yes, I liked it, too! [[User:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">夢の騎士</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">Yume no Kishi - Talk</font>]]</sup> 14:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

534489 +++$+++ Kranar drogin +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534489 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.168670340E09 +++$+++ Well, I added a link back in November or December where a very popular Podcast site Dragons Landing talked about the Nexus being the best place to find anything DL related. Here is the link. [http:\/\/www.dragonslanding.com\/dli\/alpha-phase\/episode-alpha-66\/]. In the episode summary, they talk about it a bit, but you have to listen to it, it is at 13:35 roughly. Would that qualify? They have nothing to do with the Nexus, or the development of the site.-- +++$+++ Well, I added a link back in November or December where a very popular Podcast site Dragons Landing talked about the Nexus being the best place to find anything DL related. Here is the link. [http://www.dragonslanding.com/dli/alpha-phase/episode-alpha-66/]. In the episode summary, they talk about it a bit, but you have to listen to it, it is at 13:35 roughly. Would that qualify? They have nothing to do with the Nexus, or the development of the site.--[[User:Kranar drogin|Kranar drogin]] 22:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
534490 +++$+++ Kranar drogin +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534489 +++$+++ 534489 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.168671780E09 +++$+++ Ok, I added in the points with some info for the [[Dragonlance Nexus]]. Should I have created links to all the author contributions at the bottom of the page?-- +++$+++ :Ok, I added in the points with some info for the [[Dragonlance Nexus]]. Should I have created links to all the author contributions at the bottom of the page?--[[User:Kranar drogin|Kranar drogin]] 23:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
534491 +++$+++ Kranar drogin +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534489 +++$+++ 534490 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.168676040E09 +++$+++ Just going to keep adding to this one. Basically, Registration means do you have to register to go and visit the site. That would be No for it.-- +++$+++ ::Just going to keep adding to this one. Basically, Registration means do you have to register to go and visit the site. That would be No for it.--[[User:Kranar drogin|Kranar drogin]] 00:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

569679 +++$+++ Working for Him +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-04 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.170583380E09 +++$+++ Give me a good reason why Conservapedia is kept being deleted and I will stop. If you delete me I promise I will come back with revenge and a Wikipedia authority. - +++$+++ Give me a good reason why Conservapedia is kept being deleted and I will stop. If you delete me I promise I will come back with revenge and a Wikipedia authority. -[[User:Working for Him|I&#39;m Working for Him]] 02:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
569680 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569679 +++$+++ 569679 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.170583620E09 +++$+++ The reasons for deletion are contained within the above-linked discussion.  If you have a solid business case for its restoration and improvement then please take it to [[:Wikipedia:Deletion review|a deletion review]] rather than recreating the article.  Incidentally, it is preferred that editors [[:WP:AGF|assume good faith]] on the part of other editors and the issuing of threats runs counter to the spirit of collaborative effort and good faith.  Regards,  +++$+++ :The reasons for deletion are contained within the above-linked discussion.  If you have a solid business case for its restoration and improvement then please take it to [[:Wikipedia:Deletion review|a deletion review]] rather than recreating the article.  Incidentally, it is preferred that editors [[:WP:AGF|assume good faith]] on the part of other editors and the issuing of threats runs counter to the spirit of collaborative effort and good faith.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 02:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

534494 +++$+++ Kranar drogin +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-13 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.168687980E09 +++$+++ Ok, I think this is the page you are looking for [http:\/\/ww2.wizards.com\/books\/Wizards\/Bios\/default.aspx].-- +++$+++ Ok, I think this is the page you are looking for [http://ww2.wizards.com/books/Wizards/Bios/default.aspx].--[[User:Kranar drogin|Kranar drogin]] 03:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
534495 +++$+++ Kranar drogin +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534494 +++$+++ 534494 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.168688220E09 +++$+++ Well, I do I guess. I'll see what I can come up with later, don't have the time right now. So many more new articles to post on the Lexicon, and date additions.-- +++$+++ :Well, I do I guess. I'll see what I can come up with later, don't have the time right now. So many more new articles to post on the Lexicon, and date additions.--[[User:Kranar drogin|Kranar drogin]] 03:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

10207 +++$+++ Skookum1 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10207 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-30 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.293765480E09 +++$+++ your bot for entries in British Columbia; coordinates provided from interwiki sources are not accurate, and the two I've fixed so far were wildly off [[Fraser Valley]] and [[Kitsilano]]; the first was sourced from fr-wiki, the second from sk-wiki, but given that those pages in French and Slovak are not properly sourced (coords or otherwise), why are you using them as a source?  The Kitsilano item was on Hollyburn Mountain in West Vancouver - has a view of Kitsilano, but it's not Kitsilano; the Fraser Valley coordinates were in Rosedale, in teh upper end of teh valley northeast of Chilliwack; I adjusted them to the coordinates of the old [[District of Matsqui]], which is about centre (more or less).  Core source for coordinates in BC is [[BCGNIS]], for Canada as a whole [[CGNDB]], though not sure how\/if they can be parsed botomatically.....I have a copy of the provincial gazette, which is a CSV file and is the basis for BCGNIS; if you'd like a copy email me and I will forward it; there must be way to integrate\/parse its coordinates by bot.  Some discrepancies will result, especially in cases like \"Salmon River\" or \"Black Creek\" of which there are many entries and will require human discernment. +++$+++ your bot for entries in British Columbia; coordinates provided from interwiki sources are not accurate, and the two I've fixed so far were wildly off [[Fraser Valley]] and [[Kitsilano]]; the first was sourced from fr-wiki, the second from sk-wiki, but given that those pages in French and Slovak are not properly sourced (coords or otherwise), why are you using them as a source?  The Kitsilano item was on Hollyburn Mountain in West Vancouver - has a view of Kitsilano, but it's not Kitsilano; the Fraser Valley coordinates were in Rosedale, in teh upper end of teh valley northeast of Chilliwack; I adjusted them to the coordinates of the old [[District of Matsqui]], which is about centre (more or less).  Core source for coordinates in BC is [[BCGNIS]], for Canada as a whole [[CGNDB]], though not sure how/if they can be parsed botomatically.....I have a copy of the provincial gazette, which is a CSV file and is the basis for BCGNIS; if you'd like a copy email me and I will forward it; there must be way to integrate/parse its coordinates by bot.  Some discrepancies will result, especially in cases like "Salmon River" or "Black Creek" of which there are many entries and will require human discernment.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 19:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10208 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10207 +++$+++ 10207 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.293765780E09 +++$+++ I wonder if something similar might be possible for Canada? I can't currently see any licensing information for either the BCGNIS or CGNDB -- if it can be shown that they can be used under Wikipedia's licensing terms, I'd be happy to give this a go. --  +++$+++ :I wonder if something similar might be possible for Canada? I can't currently see any licensing information for either the BCGNIS or CGNDB -- if it can be shown that they can be used under Wikipedia's licensing terms, I'd be happy to give this a go. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 19:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10209 +++$+++ Skookum1 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10207 +++$+++ 10208 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.293769800E09 +++$+++ The coordinates and I think the basic descriptions, if any, are public domain (e.g. \"part of the city of Vancouver, in th New Westminster Land District), only the page layout and things like historical\/name-origin are Crown copyright, but even they are often citations from public works, often public-domain works (like Capt. Walbran).  Coordinates themselves are not copyrightable.  The siteowner of bivouac.com had a parsing method where he could use [http:\/\/openmaps.gov.bc.ca\/imfows13\/imf.jsp?site=idt the Provincial Basemap system] somehow to generate displays of it from pages in bivouac.  For coordinates we didn't use BCGNIS, though, as they're often rounded (they have a project underway to \"hone\" them but are short of funding....or I might have a job with them otherwise ;-)), so we used Basemap (in BC) and other sources (for YT, AB etc) to refine the coordinates visually, so their coordinates are often more accurate\/precise than in BCGNIS; theoretically parseable also.  The coordinates in BCGNIS are the same as those in the Provincial Gazette, which should be easy to parse as it's just a CSV; email me, they sent me a copy (as they will to anyone who asks); should be just a matter of stripping data from certain fields....multiple-entry items could be tagged as such, maybe (e.g. \"Bear Lake\" - though all those have been done, I think, mostly by myself), with the tag saying \"multiple entries exist, please choose from among the following entries\" +++$+++ ::The coordinates and I think the basic descriptions, if any, are public domain (e.g. "part of the city of Vancouver, in th New Westminster Land District), only the page layout and things like historical/name-origin are Crown copyright, but even they are often citations from public works, often public-domain works (like Capt. Walbran).  Coordinates themselves are not copyrightable.  The siteowner of bivouac.com had a parsing method where he could use [http://openmaps.gov.bc.ca/imfows13/imf.jsp?site=idt the Provincial Basemap system] somehow to generate displays of it from pages in bivouac.  For coordinates we didn't use BCGNIS, though, as they're often rounded (they have a project underway to "hone" them but are short of funding....or I might have a job with them otherwise ;-)), so we used Basemap (in BC) and other sources (for YT, AB etc) to refine the coordinates visually, so their coordinates are often more accurate/precise than in BCGNIS; theoretically parseable also.  The coordinates in BCGNIS are the same as those in the Provincial Gazette, which should be easy to parse as it's just a CSV; email me, they sent me a copy (as they will to anyone who asks); should be just a matter of stripping data from certain fields....multiple-entry items could be tagged as such, maybe (e.g. "Bear Lake" - though all those have been done, I think, mostly by myself), with the tag saying "multiple entries exist, please choose from among the following entries"[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 20:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10210 +++$+++ Skookum1 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10207 +++$+++ 10208 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.293770820E09 +++$+++ BTW there are two parallel systems right now, and as you've seen the older one temporarily hits \"Page not found\" but does redirect to the proper search window for \"old BCGNIS\".  The new system is BC Names and I should know the link for it by now, but haven't updated my bookmarks since the older one still works; it has nicer graphics etc and in some cases more updated name-origin\/history information.  The pages themselves are crown copyright, but again, the coordinates, by definition, ''are not''.  I can get you verification on that if need be, but bear in mind that \"source:BCGNIS\" in the coord template means that it's OK, you're only quoting a copyrighted work, not reproducing it entire\/unmodified. +++$+++ ::BTW there are two parallel systems right now, and as you've seen the older one temporarily hits "Page not found" but does redirect to the proper search window for "old BCGNIS".  The new system is BC Names and I should know the link for it by now, but haven't updated my bookmarks since the older one still works; it has nicer graphics etc and in some cases more updated name-origin/history information.  The pages themselves are crown copyright, but again, the coordinates, by definition, ''are not''.  I can get you verification on that if need be, but bear in mind that "source:BCGNIS" in the coord template means that it's OK, you're only quoting a copyrighted work, not reproducing it entire/unmodified.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 20:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10211 +++$+++ Skookum1 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10207 +++$+++ 10208 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.293774300E09 +++$+++ Googlemaps has all kinds of problems and I wish I knew how to get \"at them\"; interestingly the location given, which was at the far northern end of Okanagan Lake (and way too far north), was the location of a village-cum-HBC post ''Okanaqen'', mentioned by [[James Teit]] in his ''History of the Chiefs of the Okanagan'' passages, where [[Chief Nicola]] lived as a young man before moving to [[Nicola Lake]] (though not usually used as the name-origin cite, oddly), but that seems coincidental as Teit's works are very obscure nowadays (unless you're an ethnologist or early-BC historian); I've corrected them to [[Rattlesnake Island (Okanagan Lake)]]'s coords, which are near-centre; even Kelowna is a bit far north for centre; the range of the region is from the border to Armstrong\/Spallumcheen. +++$+++ **Googlemaps has all kinds of problems and I wish I knew how to get "at them"; interestingly the location given, which was at the far northern end of Okanagan Lake (and way too far north), was the location of a village-cum-HBC post ''Okanaqen'', mentioned by [[James Teit]] in his ''History of the Chiefs of the Okanagan'' passages, where [[Chief Nicola]] lived as a young man before moving to [[Nicola Lake]] (though not usually used as the name-origin cite, oddly), but that seems coincidental as Teit's works are very obscure nowadays (unless you're an ethnologist or early-BC historian); I've corrected them to [[Rattlesnake Island (Okanagan Lake)]]'s coords, which are near-centre; even Kelowna is a bit far north for centre; the range of the region is from the border to Armstrong/Spallumcheen.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 21:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10212 +++$+++ Skookum1 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10207 +++$+++ 10208 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.293774660E09 +++$+++ Should be, the Red River Colony included, I think, the US part of the valley, which is more south of the border than not; given the history, though, a Canadian coordinate is kind of called for, so the border should be fine. +++$+++ **Should be, the Red River Colony included, I think, the US part of the valley, which is more south of the border than not; given the history, though, a Canadian coordinate is kind of called for, so the border should be fine.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 21:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10213 +++$+++ Skookum1 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10207 +++$+++ 10208 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.293774660E09 +++$+++ The location is only at the Whistler Mountain\/Roundhouse Station; I'm not sure what to do about things like this, which is really a railway license (lifts are governed by the Railway Act in BC); the Blackcomb\/Seventh Heaven terminus wouldn't do either; I'm not in the mood right now but will use Basemap later to located the centre point, which would be roughly right over the line of Fitzsimmons Creek where it passes underneath the gondola's cables. +++$+++ **The location is only at the Whistler Mountain/Roundhouse Station; I'm not sure what to do about things like this, which is really a railway license (lifts are governed by the Railway Act in BC); the Blackcomb/Seventh Heaven terminus wouldn't do either; I'm not in the mood right now but will use Basemap later to located the centre point, which would be roughly right over the line of Fitzsimmons Creek where it passes underneath the gondola's cables.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 21:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10214 +++$+++ Skookum1 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10207 +++$+++ 10208 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.293775200E09 +++$+++ location given is near the city of Williams Lake, which on a N-S basis is OK, though I think it should be further east; I'm not happy with my own map there, as there's issues with including the Chilcotin as part of the Cariboo; which folks in the Chilcotin don't, though \"Cariboozers\" do (Caribooer is teh polite version).; seems to me somewhere mid-way between \"Billy's Puddle\" (as Williams Lake is nicknamed) and Horsefly Lake might work better, I'll tinker around about it.  French wiki probably went off that opening map; I should come up with one that's just \"Cariboo proper\", as it's different from \"Cariboo Plateau\" proper; but it's a vaguely-defined region in its southern extremities; Clinton considers itself Gateway to the Cariboo, but Ashcroft, Cache Creek, Lillooet and Kamloops have all been considered part of it over the years (Ashcroft-Cache Creek consider themselves \"South Cariboo\" but Clinton and 100 Mile are seen as t hat by people in the rest of the Cariboo, northwards; Quesnel, though near the northern limit of the region, considers itself the Centre of the Cariboo, because in the old days it was the first city and the Cariboo goldfields, which is what \"Cariboo\" meant back then, are to its east. +++$+++ **location given is near the city of Williams Lake, which on a N-S basis is OK, though I think it should be further east; I'm not happy with my own map there, as there's issues with including the Chilcotin as part of the Cariboo; which folks in the Chilcotin don't, though "Cariboozers" do (Caribooer is teh polite version).; seems to me somewhere mid-way between "Billy's Puddle" (as Williams Lake is nicknamed) and Horsefly Lake might work better, I'll tinker around about it.  French wiki probably went off that opening map; I should come up with one that's just "Cariboo proper", as it's different from "Cariboo Plateau" proper; but it's a vaguely-defined region in its southern extremities; Clinton considers itself Gateway to the Cariboo, but Ashcroft, Cache Creek, Lillooet and Kamloops have all been considered part of it over the years (Ashcroft-Cache Creek consider themselves "South Cariboo" but Clinton and 100 Mile are seen as t hat by people in the rest of the Cariboo, northwards; Quesnel, though near the northern limit of the region, considers itself the Centre of the Cariboo, because in the old days it was the first city and the Cariboo goldfields, which is what "Cariboo" meant back then, are to its east.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 22:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
10215 +++$+++ Skookum1 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10207 +++$+++ 10208 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.293775440E09 +++$+++ BCGNIS is not updated enough to have the protected area (most protected areas are not listed unless they were previously provincial parks), though the [[Nechako Canyon]] entry exists; its coords are 53\xb036'00\"N 124\xb056'00\"W - fr-wiki looks to be two minutes too far north, which is quite a bit. +++$+++ **BCGNIS is not updated enough to have the protected area (most protected areas are not listed unless they were previously provincial parks), though the [[Nechako Canyon]] entry exists; its coords are 53°36'00"N 124°56'00"W - fr-wiki looks to be two minutes too far north, which is quite a bit.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 22:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

272353 +++$+++ Lazylaces +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-12 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.176440520E09 +++$+++ Got an RfA. It'll fail miserably. +++$+++ Got an RfA. It'll fail miserably.[[User:Lazylaces|Lazy]][[User_Talk:Lazylaces|Laces]] 22:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
272354 +++$+++ Yume no Kishi +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272353 +++$+++ 272353 +++$+++ 2007-04-15 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.176675060E09 +++$+++ Well, that is probably a better place for it... ^_^;; (Heh, I finally bothered to put my userboxes into templates, too... and now you can see what else I like, besides TMM... ^_^;)  +++$+++ :Well, that is probably a better place for it... ^_^;; (Heh, I finally bothered to put my userboxes into templates, too... and now you can see what else I like, besides TMM... ^_^;) [[User:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">夢の騎士</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">Yume no Kishi - Talk</font>]]</sup> 15:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

471708 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-22 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.193080740E09 +++$+++ Congrats on breaking the [[WP:100#Requests for adminship|100]] mark : ) -  +++$+++ Congrats on breaking the [[WP:100#Requests for adminship|100]] mark : ) - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 12:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
471709 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471708 +++$+++ 471708 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.193081040E09 +++$+++ Thanks! - Thanks for the congrats. I was going to wait until it was over to drop you a note, but I'll apologise now for not letting you know about the nomination, as I know you wanted to co-nom. It all started happening very quickly once I decided to accept Wizardman's nom, and I wanted to avoid lots of co-noms,  but I think you were the first person to suggest a nomination, and I hope you found my link to that in my statement!  +++$+++ :Thanks! - Thanks for the congrats. I was going to wait until it was over to drop you a note, but I'll apologise now for not letting you know about the nomination, as I know you wanted to co-nom. It all started happening very quickly once I decided to accept Wizardman's nom, and I wanted to avoid lots of co-noms,  but I think you were the first person to suggest a nomination, and I hope you found my link to that in my statement! [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 12:24, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
471710 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471708 +++$+++ 471709 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.193081400E09 +++$+++ And as I mentioned above, I suppose I still could have, had I chosen to. But I felt that 2 verbose people in the intro was enough, you probably didn't need a third : ) -  +++$+++ ::And as I mentioned above, I suppose I still could have, had I chosen to. But I felt that 2 verbose people in the intro was enough, you probably didn't need a third : ) - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 12:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

272356 +++$+++ Yume no Kishi +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.176752400E09 +++$+++ Just was wondering... there's some person here on Wikipedia (without even an account) who keeps on tagging random fair use images (mostly screenshots) as \"unsourced\". I did bother to put some description for screenshots we (Angelofdeath275 and I) have uploaded (\"screenshot taken by Yume no Kishi and uploaded by Angelofdeath275\"), but ''do we really have to write this stuff''? These are screenshots from a particular anime, they weren't taken from any webpage, but directly from *.avi files, so there is no any other \"source\"... do we have to put this stuff on every image description page?..  +++$+++ Just was wondering... there's some person here on Wikipedia (without even an account) who keeps on tagging random fair use images (mostly screenshots) as "unsourced". I did bother to put some description for screenshots we (Angelofdeath275 and I) have uploaded ("screenshot taken by Yume no Kishi and uploaded by Angelofdeath275"), but ''do we really have to write this stuff''? These are screenshots from a particular anime, they weren't taken from any webpage, but directly from *.avi files, so there is no any other "source"... do we have to put this stuff on every image description page?.. [[User:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">夢の騎士</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">Yume no Kishi - Talk</font>]]</sup> 12:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
272357 +++$+++ Yume no Kishi +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272356 +++$+++ 272356 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.176756180E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Tsukiko.jpg]] This one was tagged as \"unsourced\", and after that I bothered to do what I described above. Look at [[Special:Contributions\/163.139.215.193|this]].  +++$+++ :[[:Image:Tsukiko.jpg]] This one was tagged as "unsourced", and after that I bothered to do what I described above. Look at [[Special:Contributions/163.139.215.193|this]]. [[User:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">夢の騎士</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yume no Kishi|<font color="goldenrod">Yume no Kishi - Talk</font>]]</sup> 13:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

534503 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.168832460E09 +++$+++ TEST MESSAGE GOES HERE. '''''<font color=\"darkblue\"> +++$+++ TEST MESSAGE GOES HERE. '''''<font color="darkblue">[[User:DoomsDay349|Dooms]]</font><font color="lightblue">[[User talk:DoomsDay349|Day349]]</font>''''' 19:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
534504 +++$+++  +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534503 +++$+++ 534503 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.168876140E09 +++$+++ I think it would look better over THERE. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.ms]] +++$+++ :I think it would look better over THERE. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.ms]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|2]] . [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Dfrg.msc|Editor Review]]</sup></small> 07:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

272361 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-26 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.177580940E09 +++$+++ It's only apparently run by [[User:Richardson j]], who also likes [[Tokyo Mew Mew|MewMew]] (darn, I know you're on to something...) -- +++$+++ It's only apparently run by [[User:Richardson j]], who also likes [[Tokyo Mew Mew|MewMew]] (darn, I know you're on to something...) --[[User:Addict 2006|Addict]] [[User talk:Addict 2006|2006]] 02:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
272362 +++$+++ Iamunknown +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272361 +++$+++ 272361 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.177582140E09 +++$+++ By the title it seems to me that Richardson j intends to start a coordinated effort to assess articles, as per [[WP:1.0]]; by the content, it quite simply is [[Wikipedia:Patent nonsense]].  Notability, however, is not a primary concern since the page is in the project namespace, but it might benefit more (and be under less scrutiny) if it were in his user space.  What do you think?  -- +++$+++ : By the title it seems to me that Richardson j intends to start a coordinated effort to assess articles, as per [[WP:1.0]]; by the content, it quite simply is [[Wikipedia:Patent nonsense]].  Notability, however, is not a primary concern since the page is in the project namespace, but it might benefit more (and be under less scrutiny) if it were in his user space.  What do you think?  --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 03:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
272363 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272361 +++$+++ 272362 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.177582320E09 +++$+++ I thought so too. Get him to move it to a user subpage or something. -- +++$+++ ::I thought so too. Get him to move it to a user subpage or something. --[[User:Addict 2006|Addict]] [[User talk:Addict 2006|2006]] 03:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
272364 +++$+++ Iamunknown +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272361 +++$+++ 272363 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.177582500E09 +++$+++ If you need any additional help, feel free to post here or on my talk page.  Regards,  +++$+++ ::* If you need any additional help, feel free to post here or on my talk page.  Regards, [[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 03:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
272365 +++$+++ Iamunknown +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272361 +++$+++ 272363 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.177582560E09 +++$+++ It looks like someone beat us to it and tagged the page for speedy deletion.  -- +++$+++ ::* It looks like someone beat us to it and tagged the page for speedy deletion.  --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 03:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

10218 +++$+++ WTucker +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-31 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.293793320E09 +++$+++ Your bot appears to be [[Special:Contributions\/The Anomebot2|adding unsourced geocoordinates]] to a massive number of articles. Interwiki hardly qualifies as a [[WP:RS]]. Please stop. Some of these geographical locations are sensitive. They may be located on private property, have restricted access, be dangerous, contain valuable and fragile cultural resources, etc. These sensitive locations are threatened by the publication of their geocoords. This invites the unprepared, the ignorant and possibly the unscrupulous to trespass, vandalise, and damage the location or to injure themselves or others. Besides most of these geocoord edits you are doing fall into the realm of [[WP:NOR|original research]] which is seriously frowned upon. Please, only add geocoords to articles which are [[WP:VERIFY|verifiable]] from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]; and, then, the citation should go with the edit. Adding unsourced, uncited, unverifiable edits to a massive number of articles is cause for concern. Please stop. Thanks.  +++$+++ Your bot appears to be [[Special:Contributions/The Anomebot2|adding unsourced geocoordinates]] to a massive number of articles. Interwiki hardly qualifies as a [[WP:RS]]. Please stop. Some of these geographical locations are sensitive. They may be located on private property, have restricted access, be dangerous, contain valuable and fragile cultural resources, etc. These sensitive locations are threatened by the publication of their geocoords. This invites the unprepared, the ignorant and possibly the unscrupulous to trespass, vandalise, and damage the location or to injure themselves or others. Besides most of these geocoord edits you are doing fall into the realm of [[WP:NOR|original research]] which is seriously frowned upon. Please, only add geocoords to articles which are [[WP:VERIFY|verifiable]] from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]; and, then, the citation should go with the edit. Adding unsourced, uncited, unverifiable edits to a massive number of articles is cause for concern. Please stop. Thanks. [[User:WTucker|WTucker]] ([[User talk:WTucker|talk]]) 03:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
10219 +++$+++ Tagishsimon +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10218 +++$+++ 10218 +++$+++ 2010-12-31 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.293795780E09 +++$+++ I'm sure WT is merely being forgetful in failing to point you to his more public rendition of this rather confused complaint, at [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Unsourced_geocoords]], Anome. -- +++$+++ :I'm sure WT is merely being forgetful in failing to point you to his more public rendition of this rather confused complaint, at [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Unsourced_geocoords]], Anome. --[[User:Tagishsimon|Tagishsimon]] [[User_talk:Tagishsimon|(talk)]] 03:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

534507 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.168837500E09 +++$+++ I know how you're feeling right now, and you have my sympathy. The best way to deal with it is to go do something else on Wikipedia, go find a good article to improve or join a WikiProject. Take a step back and don't get so personally affronted by the intense stupidity of some people. Yes, I suspect you would fail an RfA right now, but that's because your comments on the DRV show you don't have a level head in heated situations; whether being on the robotic heartless side when it comes to Esperanza is a hindrance to an RfA, I don't know, and we'll find out next week when I am nominated. Try and stay calm, don't put messages like \"If you believe you have a rat's chance in hell at overturning the MFD consensus\" on talkpages. Remember, we're vocal, but we're the rearguard of a consensus of a much larger number of editors - there's a hundred of us, and about 6 of them. They're naive, idealistic users (and Geo and why1991 have already got into trouble for other unEA related things) and all we need to do is just keep an eye on them to stop any new weird ideas they get in their tracks (which is, of course, exactly what we're doing). We can't do more than that, so just try to move on: it's not our fault that they can't. :)  +++$+++ I know how you're feeling right now, and you have my sympathy. The best way to deal with it is to go do something else on Wikipedia, go find a good article to improve or join a WikiProject. Take a step back and don't get so personally affronted by the intense stupidity of some people. Yes, I suspect you would fail an RfA right now, but that's because your comments on the DRV show you don't have a level head in heated situations; whether being on the robotic heartless side when it comes to Esperanza is a hindrance to an RfA, I don't know, and we'll find out next week when I am nominated. Try and stay calm, don't put messages like "If you believe you have a rat's chance in hell at overturning the MFD consensus" on talkpages. Remember, we're vocal, but we're the rearguard of a consensus of a much larger number of editors - there's a hundred of us, and about 6 of them. They're naive, idealistic users (and Geo and why1991 have already got into trouble for other unEA related things) and all we need to do is just keep an eye on them to stop any new weird ideas they get in their tracks (which is, of course, exactly what we're doing). We can't do more than that, so just try to move on: it's not our fault that they can't. :) [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 21:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
534508 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534507 +++$+++ 534507 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.168840620E09 +++$+++ Regarding you, I would be happy to vote for you, but I just checked your last 1000 contribs and while you have a good solid editing background, you seem a little weak on policy. You might want to contribute to some policy proposals and consensus building discussions. All you have in that direction atm is Esperanza's overhaul, and that's a touchy subject for a lot of people. Just a thought.  +++$+++ :Regarding you, I would be happy to vote for you, but I just checked your last 1000 contribs and while you have a good solid editing background, you seem a little weak on policy. You might want to contribute to some policy proposals and consensus building discussions. All you have in that direction atm is Esperanza's overhaul, and that's a touchy subject for a lot of people. Just a thought. [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 21:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
534509 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534507 +++$+++ 534508 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.168842720E09 +++$+++ Try [[:Category:Wikipedia proposals]] and [[WP:CENT]]. It's not to just \"hit all the bases\", but checking some of the discussions going on might be beneficial to you in giving you a greater understanding of consensus. Also, many of your deletion nominations don't refer to any policies. You might want to work on that, possibly by voting on a few more *fDs.  +++$+++ ::Try [[:Category:Wikipedia proposals]] and [[WP:CENT]]. It's not to just "hit all the bases", but checking some of the discussions going on might be beneficial to you in giving you a greater understanding of consensus. Also, many of your deletion nominations don't refer to any policies. You might want to work on that, possibly by voting on a few more *fDs. [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 22:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
534510 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534507 +++$+++ 534509 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.168843440E09 +++$+++ Yep, I get that. And your recent noms have all been in MfD, which is less policy driven. Nice comments on your editor review, congrats.  +++$+++ :::Yep, I get that. And your recent noms have all been in MfD, which is less policy driven. Nice comments on your editor review, congrats. [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 22:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

10220 +++$+++ Ploversegg +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-31 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.293808980E09 +++$+++ Hi. You appear to have inadvertantly added geo coordinates to a place whose location is not known ie. the ancient city of [[Ekallatum]]. If you have actually discovered it's location, that would be cool, otherwise, it's probably not a good idea. +++$+++ Hi. You appear to have inadvertantly added geo coordinates to a place whose location is not known ie. the ancient city of [[Ekallatum]]. If you have actually discovered it's location, that would be cool, otherwise, it's probably not a good idea.[[User:Ploversegg|Ploversegg]] ([[User talk:Ploversegg|talk]]) 07:23, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
10221 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10220 +++$+++ 10220 +++$+++ 2010-12-31 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.293836940E09 +++$+++ I agree. The coordinate was taken from [[:hu:Ekall\xe1tum]], which I think has it as a hypothetical location. I have filters that try to prevent the auto-geocoding of ancient sites, for exactly this sort of reason, but this time they failed. Thanks for spotting this: I've backed off the change. --  +++$+++ :I agree. The coordinate was taken from [[:hu:Ekallátum]], which I think has it as a hypothetical location. I have filters that try to prevent the auto-geocoding of ancient sites, for exactly this sort of reason, but this time they failed. Thanks for spotting this: I've backed off the change. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 15:09, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

10222 +++$+++ Marcus Qwertyus +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-03 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.294070880E09 +++$+++ Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  +++$+++ Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. [[User:Marcus Qwertyus|<font color="#21421E" face="font-family: 'Maiandra GD', sans-serif;">'''Marcus'''</font>]] [[User talk:Marcus Qwertyus|<font color="#CC7722" face="font-family: 'Maiandra GD', sans-serif;">'''Qwertyus'''</font>]]  08:08, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
10223 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10222 +++$+++ 10222 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.294089480E09 +++$+++ I've closed this AfD as a '''speedy keep''', per the comments there, and then finished the merge proposed by a majority of submitters. --  +++$+++ :I've closed this AfD as a '''speedy keep''', per the comments there, and then finished the merge proposed by a majority of submitters. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 13:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

613373 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613373 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-29 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.222738020E09 +++$+++ statement that ''\"It is completely unacceptable for a user to just delete material that he or she disagrees with\"'' contradicts [[WP:Verifiability]] which says that ''\"Any material lacking a reliable source may be removed\"'' (as you've stated above). This user is becoming increasingly nasty in his crusade to discredit me, while his sockpuppetry case is still pending. \u2013 +++$+++ statement that ''"It is completely unacceptable for a user to just delete material that he or she disagrees with"'' contradicts [[WP:Verifiability]] which says that ''"Any material lacking a reliable source may be removed"'' (as you've stated above). This user is becoming increasingly nasty in his crusade to discredit me, while his sockpuppetry case is still pending. –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 18:27, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
613374 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613373 +++$+++ 613373 +++$+++ 2008-09-29 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.222743000E09 +++$+++ VirtualSteve has given a sensible response to the \"vandalism\" allegations,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:VirtualSteve&oldid=241753683#Vandalism_etc_report_against_User:Signalhead] these accusations should sink there but obviously keep a watch out to see if any attempt is made to find diffs which need explaining. The purported email looks most unlikely, and as you say it seems to reflect I B Wright's misunderstanding of [[WP:V]] and of the need for talk page consensus. The comments on your talk page look as though they're verging on [[WP:HARASS|harassment]], and can be reported as such if they resume. Let me know if that happens . .  +++$+++ :VirtualSteve has given a sensible response to the "vandalism" allegations,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:VirtualSteve&oldid=241753683#Vandalism_etc_report_against_User:Signalhead] these accusations should sink there but obviously keep a watch out to see if any attempt is made to find diffs which need explaining. The purported email looks most unlikely, and as you say it seems to reflect I B Wright's misunderstanding of [[WP:V]] and of the need for talk page consensus. The comments on your talk page look as though they're verging on [[WP:HARASS|harassment]], and can be reported as such if they resume. Let me know if that happens . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
613375 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613373 +++$+++ 613374 +++$+++ 2008-09-29 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.222743840E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks for giving this your attention. \u2013 +++$+++ ::Okay, thanks for giving this your attention. –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 20:04, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

10224 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-04 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.294204560E09 +++$+++ [[User:The Anomebot2|The Anomebot2]] added coords to [[Light]]. This doesn't make sense to me so I removed them. Am I missing something?--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ [[User:The Anomebot2|The Anomebot2]] added coords to [[Light]]. This doesn't make sense to me so I removed them. Am I missing something?--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 21:16, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
10225 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10224 +++$+++ 10224 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.294206900E09 +++$+++ I glanced upthread after posting. Having added a few hundred geocodes manually, I applaud your efforts. I found the first 50 fun, the next 200 tolerable, then the next batch were tedious, and I've lost my desire to do it manually. If it can be done automatically with an acceptably small error rate, which you seem to be diligently improving, I'm all for it.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ : I glanced upthread after posting. Having added a few hundred geocodes manually, I applaud your efforts. I found the first 50 fun, the next 200 tolerable, then the next batch were tedious, and I've lost my desire to do it manually. If it can be done automatically with an acceptably small error rate, which you seem to be diligently improving, I'm all for it.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 21:55, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
10226 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10224 +++$+++ 10225 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.294281540E09 +++$+++ Also: looking at the edit to [[Light]] has given me some more ideas about filtering: I'll take a look at taking the output of the bot's {{tl|coord missing}} generator and using to filter interwiki coordinate copies: this should suppress most of the recent weird edits. Kind regards, --  +++$+++ ::Also: looking at the edit to [[Light]] has given me some more ideas about filtering: I'll take a look at taking the output of the bot's {{tl|coord missing}} generator and using to filter interwiki coordinate copies: this should suppress most of the recent weird edits. Kind regards, -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 18:39, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
10227 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10224 +++$+++ 10226 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.294298160E09 +++$+++ I wonder, without any specific knowledge, whether there's an alternative systematic approach. My ideal situation would include some organization (National geographic, Google  Maps, Bing Maps, AAA, Garmin) with either a long list of locations and geocodes, or plans to create such a list, and a reason why it would be in their best interests for all relevant Wikipedia articles to have geocode information. For example, maybe Garmin would find it a desirable client feature, if you plan a trip from A to B, to tell you about interesting places along the way, and pop up an option to read a Wikipedia article about the place.  That might be easier to accomplish if an article had geocodes.  Wouldn't it be wonderful if they agreed, and offered to provide us a with a table of Wikipedia articles and their geocodes (or heck, this is the encyclopedia anyone can edit, maybe they could just add the geocode.)--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::: I wonder, without any specific knowledge, whether there's an alternative systematic approach. My ideal situation would include some organization (National geographic, Google  Maps, Bing Maps, AAA, Garmin) with either a long list of locations and geocodes, or plans to create such a list, and a reason why it would be in their best interests for all relevant Wikipedia articles to have geocode information. For example, maybe Garmin would find it a desirable client feature, if you plan a trip from A to B, to tell you about interesting places along the way, and pop up an option to read a Wikipedia article about the place.  That might be easier to accomplish if an article had geocodes.  Wouldn't it be wonderful if they agreed, and offered to provide us a with a table of Wikipedia articles and their geocodes (or heck, this is the encyclopedia anyone can edit, maybe they could just add the geocode.)--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 23:16, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
10228 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10224 +++$+++ 10227 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.294299000E09 +++$+++ I fear they might have intellectual property issues about donating coordinates to Wikipedia. There are certainly a number of iPhone apps that can show you the nearest features on Wikipedia to your current location, \"Vicinity\" being a good example. --  +++$+++ ::::I fear they might have intellectual property issues about donating coordinates to Wikipedia. There are certainly a number of iPhone apps that can show you the nearest features on Wikipedia to your current location, "Vicinity" being a good example. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 23:30, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

272369 +++$+++ G.A.S +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-01 12:56:00 +++$+++ 1.178049360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the welcome - although after doing on\/off edits for about 9 months now, I do not really consider myself a newcomer anymore:)  -  +++$+++ Thanks for the welcome - although after doing on/off edits for about 9 months now, I do not really consider myself a newcomer anymore:)  - [[User:G.A.S|G.A.S]] 12:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
272370 +++$+++ G.A.S +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272369 +++$+++ 272369 +++$+++ 2007-05-01 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.178049900E09 +++$+++ Some of the links will prove useful though. (Maybe I should add my userpage to (my) current tasks) -  +++$+++ * Some of the links will prove useful though. (Maybe I should add my userpage to (my) current tasks) - [[User:G.A.S|G.A.S]] 13:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

307539 +++$+++ Agendum +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307539 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-11-12 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.100308140E09 +++$+++ What Dave has done seems to be a good compromise - it seems to work well, at least for the present, and he's been able to take in the corrections\/amendments which I recommended some months back. I'm happy to go with the new list of Scottish Clans as it is - a lot of work has clearly gone into it. Probably a good idea to ditch my old list (which is now looking rather forlorn!)  +++$+++ What Dave has done seems to be a good compromise - it seems to work well, at least for the present, and he's been able to take in the corrections/amendments which I recommended some months back. I'm happy to go with the new list of Scottish Clans as it is - a lot of work has clearly gone into it. Probably a good idea to ditch my old list (which is now looking rather forlorn!) [[User:Agendum|Bruce, aka Agendum]] | [[User talk:Agendum|Talk ]] 17:09, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
307540 +++$+++ Agendum +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307539 +++$+++ 307539 +++$+++ 2004-11-15 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.100580300E09 +++$+++ Your admonition to read the Glasgow Herald - which article? - I had a look on the online version on that day, but couldn't find anything, apart from a fascinating article entitled 'The remarkable tale of Indian Peter'....  +++$+++ :Your admonition to read the Glasgow Herald - which article? - I had a look on the online version on that day, but couldn't find anything, apart from a fascinating article entitled 'The remarkable tale of Indian Peter'.... [[User:Agendum|Bruce, aka Agendum]] | [[User talk:Agendum|Talk ]] 20:45, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

272372 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272372 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-05 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.178426460E09 +++$+++ I was doing edits around the site when suddenly, the next page I went to either refused to load or was blank. I checked the source and it indeed was blank. What was wrong with the site this morning in the hour of 9 AM (Mountain time)? -- +++$+++ I was doing edits around the site when suddenly, the next page I went to either refused to load or was blank. I checked the source and it indeed was blank. What was wrong with the site this morning in the hour of 9 AM (Mountain time)? --[[User:Addict 2006|Addict]] [[User talk:Addict 2006|2006]] 21:41, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
272373 +++$+++ Real96 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272372 +++$+++ 272372 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.178426760E09 +++$+++ The servers were down, which caused the pages to slowly load. '''<font color=\"#5B92E5\" face=\"georgia\"> +++$+++ :The servers were down, which caused the pages to slowly load. '''<font color="#5B92E5" face="georgia">[[User:Real96|Real96]]</font>''' 21:46, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

10229 +++$+++ Doncram +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10229 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-05 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.294285020E09 +++$+++ Did you, or could you, figure out how to get coordinates for NRHP-listed places?  Any advice appreciated. -- +++$+++ Did you, or could you, figure out how to get coordinates for NRHP-listed places?  Any advice appreciated. --[[User:Doncram|Doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 19:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
10230 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10229 +++$+++ 10229 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.294285140E09 +++$+++ Sure. I'll take a look a bit later. Did you get your data from the .mdb file mentioned in http:\/\/nrhp.focus.nps.gov\/natreg\/docs\/Download.html#spatial ? They also state there that their data uses the [[NAD27]] datum, which can be up to 200m off from the [[WGS84]] coordinate system Wikipedia uses, for a given place in the continental U.S.: http:\/\/www.ngs.noaa.gov\/cgi-bin\/nadcon.prl offers a conversion service from NAD27 to [[NAD83]]: [http:\/\/gpsinformation.net\/main\/ngs-accuracy.txt this] claims that NAD83 is in general within 2 meters of agreement with WGS84, which is good enough for most non-cadastral, non-technical purposes, and certainly much better than the accuracy required for this purpose. Of course, you should always spot-check a small sample of your output against ground truth with something like Google Maps to sanity check it before trusting any conversions. --  +++$+++ :Sure. I'll take a look a bit later. Did you get your data from the .mdb file mentioned in http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/natreg/docs/Download.html#spatial ? They also state there that their data uses the [[NAD27]] datum, which can be up to 200m off from the [[WGS84]] coordinate system Wikipedia uses, for a given place in the continental U.S.: http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/nadcon.prl offers a conversion service from NAD27 to [[NAD83]]: [http://gpsinformation.net/main/ngs-accuracy.txt this] claims that NAD83 is in general within 2 meters of agreement with WGS84, which is good enough for most non-cadastral, non-technical purposes, and certainly much better than the accuracy required for this purpose. Of course, you should always spot-check a small sample of your output against ground truth with something like Google Maps to sanity check it before trusting any conversions. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 19:39, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
10231 +++$+++ Doncram +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10229 +++$+++ 10230 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.294287900E09 +++$+++ Subsequent to articles being started, editors have manually made corrections.  We have about 30,000 articles started, out of 85,000 total.  A long ways to go.  It seems regrettable that we aren't using the best available coordinates to start with, like those in the Google map layers mentioned on that page, which reflect some effort by the NPS to get better coords.  I am not familiar with those.  I'll try downloading the SPAtiaL.mdb also.  Thanks. -- +++$+++ ::Subsequent to articles being started, editors have manually made corrections.  We have about 30,000 articles started, out of 85,000 total.  A long ways to go.  It seems regrettable that we aren't using the best available coordinates to start with, like those in the Google map layers mentioned on that page, which reflect some effort by the NPS to get better coords.  I am not familiar with those.  I'll try downloading the SPAtiaL.mdb also.  Thanks. --[[User:Doncram|Doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 20:25, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
10232 +++$+++ Doncram +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10229 +++$+++ 10230 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.294288380E09 +++$+++ P.S.  I had already downloaded Spatial.mdb.  I see it includes a Centroids table, which is what i would want assuming it is all the regular point locations plus centroids for historic district items.  It consists of just four fields REFNUM, ZONE, EASTING_CE, and NORTHING_C.  I am not sure which version of data Elkman might be using, but i am using neither so far:  i am stuck at this point and don't know how to convert, don't have converted hrs\/minutes\/seconds to use. -- +++$+++ ::P.S.  I had already downloaded Spatial.mdb.  I see it includes a Centroids table, which is what i would want assuming it is all the regular point locations plus centroids for historic district items.  It consists of just four fields REFNUM, ZONE, EASTING_CE, and NORTHING_C.  I am not sure which version of data Elkman might be using, but i am using neither so far:  i am stuck at this point and don't know how to convert, don't have converted hrs/minutes/seconds to use. --[[User:Doncram|Doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 20:33, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
10233 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10229 +++$+++ 10232 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.294288440E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ ::: -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 20:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
10234 +++$+++ Doncram +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10229 +++$+++ 10233 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.294289640E09 +++$+++ I don't know what a KML file is, and I can't read the KML files currently.  After i download one and click on it, i am brought to Google Earth to download Google Earth 6, which i don't want to do.  And if i did i don't know that i could extract what you have here. -- +++$+++ ::::I don't know what a KML file is, and I can't read the KML files currently.  After i download one and click on it, i am brought to Google Earth to download Google Earth 6, which i don't want to do.  And if i did i don't know that i could extract what you have here. --[[User:Doncram|Doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 20:54, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

272374 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-05 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.178433900E09 +++$+++ I have no choice but to do this. Recently, I've warned an IP about vandalism, and User:Jonghyunchung goes in and [[Template:uw-tpv3|refactors]] it. I then revert that edit and post a warning to Jonghyunchung but I see that he reverted it just now. I think Jonghyunchung might be hard to handle. -- +++$+++ I have no choice but to do this. Recently, I've warned an IP about vandalism, and User:Jonghyunchung goes in and [[Template:uw-tpv3|refactors]] it. I then revert that edit and post a warning to Jonghyunchung but I see that he reverted it just now. I think Jonghyunchung might be hard to handle. --[[User:Addict 2006|Addict]] [[User talk:Addict 2006|2006]] 23:45, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
272375 +++$+++ Real96 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272374 +++$+++ 272374 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.178434020E09 +++$+++ <s>Report to [[WP:ANI]]<\/s>. '''<font color=\"#5B92E5\" face=\"georgia\"> +++$+++ :<s>Report to [[WP:ANI]]</s>. '''<font color="#5B92E5" face="georgia">[[User:Real96|Real96]]</font>''' 23:47, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
272376 +++$+++ John Reaves +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272374 +++$+++ 272375 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.178434320E09 +++$+++ Actually, I noticed that you do not appear to have attempted any contact with this user.  I've asked them for an explanation on their talk page.  I also noticed that you left them a notice about signing their comments with <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki> when you yourself didn't sign that way.  +++$+++ ::Actually, I noticed that you do not appear to have attempted any contact with this user.  I've asked them for an explanation on their talk page.  I also noticed that you left them a notice about signing their comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> when you yourself didn't sign that way. [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 23:52, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
272377 +++$+++ John Reaves +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 272374 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-06 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.178445060E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure what that means, but you need to always sign using four tildes.  +++$+++ ::::I'm not sure what that means, but you need to always sign using four tildes. [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 02:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

10235 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10235 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-05 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.294289940E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 20:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
10236 +++$+++ Doncram +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10235 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.294290720E09 +++$+++ but TonyTheTiger knew to refine that using Google Maps satellite view or whatever else.  It is actually a high-profile example, of interest to him because it is a National Historic Landmark and a Chicago city landmark, not a run-of-the-mill merely NRHP-listed place. -- +++$+++ ::::::but TonyTheTiger knew to refine that using Google Maps satellite view or whatever else.  It is actually a high-profile example, of interest to him because it is a National Historic Landmark and a Chicago city landmark, not a run-of-the-mill merely NRHP-listed place. --[[User:Doncram|Doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 21:12, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

10238 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-05 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.294295160E09 +++$+++ Now updated to deal with occasional records with broken HTML. --  +++$+++ Now updated to deal with occasional records with broken HTML. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 22:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
10239 +++$+++ Doncram +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10238 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.294297140E09 +++$+++ You're not commenting on the UTM to latitude and longitude conversion, so i am guessing u can't help as easily on that, for records not covered in this KML data.  I'll keep trying to figure out some way to convert them.  I am way ahead now with having this KML data as good check for whether any UTM converter is working properly.  Thanks again! -- +++$+++ ::You're not commenting on the UTM to latitude and longitude conversion, so i am guessing u can't help as easily on that, for records not covered in this KML data.  I'll keep trying to figure out some way to convert them.  I am way ahead now with having this KML data as good check for whether any UTM converter is working properly.  Thanks again! --[[User:Doncram|Doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 22:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
10240 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10238 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.294299180E09 +++$+++ Sounds like both of you are way ahead of me, so I'll just note that I have found some of the NRHP sites to be a bit  off \u2013 I know I was trying to track one down one location in Bloomfield CT to get a picture, and used the geocode to find it, but it wasn't there. Luckily, I found someone who was familiar with the place, and it was a couple blocks away, not far, but far enough that you couldn't use the original article geocodes to find it. I did correct the values, with some trepidation, but I feel better now. If you two work out some way to get a better list, I'd like to work with Don to find a way to review the existing codes and improve them if possible.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ :::Sounds like both of you are way ahead of me, so I'll just note that I have found some of the NRHP sites to be a bit  off – I know I was trying to track one down one location in Bloomfield CT to get a picture, and used the geocode to find it, but it wasn't there. Luckily, I found someone who was familiar with the place, and it was a couple blocks away, not far, but far enough that you couldn't use the original article geocodes to find it. I did correct the values, with some trepidation, but I feel better now. If you two work out some way to get a better list, I'd like to work with Don to find a way to review the existing codes and improve them if possible.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 23:33, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

534527 +++$+++ Trebor Rowntree +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-30 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.170224820E09 +++$+++ Professional reviews are greatly preferred to fan reviews; the problem with the latter is that we don't know wrote them. For instance, I could easily write a review and publish it on an external website, and then cite that review in Wikipedia. It's hard to articulate what I found confusing about the synopsis of the plot, but I just found it difficult to follow. There are a lot of characters with odd names, along with the different Ages and places and goddesses (and so on), and it gets hard to remember who is who. This might just be me, so I wouldn't worry about it too much.  +++$+++ Professional reviews are greatly preferred to fan reviews; the problem with the latter is that we don't know wrote them. For instance, I could easily write a review and publish it on an external website, and then cite that review in Wikipedia. It's hard to articulate what I found confusing about the synopsis of the plot, but I just found it difficult to follow. There are a lot of characters with odd names, along with the different Ages and places and goddesses (and so on), and it gets hard to remember who is who. This might just be me, so I wouldn't worry about it too much. [[User:Trebor Rowntree|Trebor]] 22:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
534528 +++$+++ Trebor Rowntree +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534527 +++$+++ 534527 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.170225060E09 +++$+++ If you can be certain no professional (or at least published) reviews exist, then no it shouldn't hurt anything; you can't write from sources which do not exist. But although I can't judge the prominence of this book, it seems ''fairly'' unlikely that there are ''no'' reviews, even if there are none online.   +++$+++ :If you can be certain no professional (or at least published) reviews exist, then no it shouldn't hurt anything; you can't write from sources which do not exist. But although I can't judge the prominence of this book, it seems ''fairly'' unlikely that there are ''no'' reviews, even if there are none online.  [[User:Trebor Rowntree|Trebor]] 22:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
534529 +++$+++ Trebor Rowntree +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534527 +++$+++ 534528 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.170225660E09 +++$+++ [[WP:RS]] is our less-than-perfect set of guidelines about what qualifies as \"reliable\".  +++$+++ ::[[WP:RS]] is our less-than-perfect set of guidelines about what qualifies as "reliable". [[User:Trebor Rowntree|Trebor]] 22:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
534530 +++$+++ Trebor Rowntree +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534527 +++$+++ 534529 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.170226320E09 +++$+++ Um, I'm not sure. You might have trouble with the \"comprehensive\" part if you don't. I wouldn't worry about it too much though.  +++$+++ :::Um, I'm not sure. You might have trouble with the "comprehensive" part if you don't. I wouldn't worry about it too much though. [[User:Trebor Rowntree|Trebor]] 22:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

10241 +++$+++ Pi.1415926535 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10241 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-07 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.294394040E09 +++$+++ Would it be possible to set the bot to avoid area codes? It's not really possible to have geocoordinates for them. Congressional districts and storms are mostly the same; ships are also pretty tricky to tag unless they're a museum ship or whatnot. I do love the bot, by the way; it leaves me only the interesting articles to geotag. Thanks!  +++$+++ Would it be possible to set the bot to avoid area codes? It's not really possible to have geocoordinates for them. Congressional districts and storms are mostly the same; ships are also pretty tricky to tag unless they're a museum ship or whatnot. I do love the bot, by the way; it leaves me only the interesting articles to geotag. Thanks! [[User:Pi.1415926535|Pi.1415926535]] ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|talk]]) 01:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
10242 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10241 +++$+++ 10241 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.294394520E09 +++$+++ Sure. I thought I was already blacklisting storms -- can you please give me an example of each of these cases, and I'll check them out. --  +++$+++ :Sure. I thought I was already blacklisting storms -- can you please give me an example of each of these cases, and I'll check them out. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 02:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
10243 +++$+++ 7 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10241 +++$+++ 10241 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.294396260E09 +++$+++ {{tps}}Here is one [[Area codes 860 and 959]].  I had mentioned a similar article back in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Anome&diff=prev&oldid=362046023 May] but it may have been missed because I included it in an old comment.   +++$+++ :{{tps}}Here is one [[Area codes 860 and 959]].  I had mentioned a similar article back in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Anome&diff=prev&oldid=362046023 May] but it may have been missed because I included it in an old comment.  [[User talk:7|<span style="background:#acf;padding:2px;color:white;text-shadow:black 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em">&nbsp;'''7'''&nbsp;</span>]] 02:31, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
10244 +++$+++ Elipongo +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10241 +++$+++ 10243 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.294396800E09 +++$+++ I am not sure I understand the logic here. If the [[Atlantic Ocean]] can have geocoordinates, why can't congressional districts, telephone area codes, and ancient lakes? It's not like the case with storms because those other things have definite agreed upon physical locations.--&mdash; +++$+++ ::I am not sure I understand the logic here. If the [[Atlantic Ocean]] can have geocoordinates, why can't congressional districts, telephone area codes, and ancient lakes? It's not like the case with storms because those other things have definite agreed upon physical locations.--&mdash;[[User:Elipongo|Elipongo]] <small>([[User talk:Elipongo|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Elipongo|contribs]])</small> 02:40, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
10245 +++$+++ Pi.1415926535 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10241 +++$+++ 10244 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.294397820E09 +++$+++ With the Atlantic, the coordinates make it meaningful - any mapping site will show the ocean. A map is meaningful for congressional districts, area codes, and lakes; geocoordinates that point to a random location inside such things which are invisible on mass maps like Google Maps are not useful for those cases.  +++$+++ ::: With the Atlantic, the coordinates make it meaningful - any mapping site will show the ocean. A map is meaningful for congressional districts, area codes, and lakes; geocoordinates that point to a random location inside such things which are invisible on mass maps like Google Maps are not useful for those cases. [[User:Pi.1415926535|Pi.1415926535]] ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|talk]]) 02:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
10246 +++$+++ Elipongo +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10241 +++$+++ 10243 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.294399020E09 +++$+++ I still do not understand the logic of your point. What differentiates a \"random point\" in the [[Atlantic Ocean]] from one in [[Area code 203]] or [[Connecticut]] for that matter? If it's a scaling issue, that's why there's a parameter for that in the template. Our mission isn't to be a supplier of content to Google Maps, so a coordinate's lack of usefulness in their Wikipedia layer hardly seems relevent to me. --&mdash; +++$+++ ::I still do not understand the logic of your point. What differentiates a "random point" in the [[Atlantic Ocean]] from one in [[Area code 203]] or [[Connecticut]] for that matter? If it's a scaling issue, that's why there's a parameter for that in the template. Our mission isn't to be a supplier of content to Google Maps, so a coordinate's lack of usefulness in their Wikipedia layer hardly seems relevent to me. --&mdash;[[User:Elipongo|Elipongo]] <small>([[User talk:Elipongo|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Elipongo|contribs]])</small> 03:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
10247 +++$+++ 7 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10241 +++$+++ 10246 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.294399620E09 +++$+++ Putting a coord on Atlantic Ocean is not especially useful, but its at the same time at least it is not confusing because the boundaries are clearly visible on map or satellite which identify item.  However, area codes don't follow such strict boundries.  Within CT there 203, 457, and 860.  There are no clear maps which would define where one starts and one ends because after CT expanded from just 203 people who needed new phone numbers got new codes.  I know people with one house with two lines, both of which have different area codes indicating the age at which they got the numbers, not the geographical location.  Lastly, and this is a stretch (I agree), but VOIP has essentially made area codes irrelevant.  My number follows me around the world with Vonage and Skype.  Putting a coordinate on an article like this implies a false precision, regardless of how far out the map layer is zoomed.   +++$+++ :::Putting a coord on Atlantic Ocean is not especially useful, but its at the same time at least it is not confusing because the boundaries are clearly visible on map or satellite which identify item.  However, area codes don't follow such strict boundries.  Within CT there 203, 457, and 860.  There are no clear maps which would define where one starts and one ends because after CT expanded from just 203 people who needed new phone numbers got new codes.  I know people with one house with two lines, both of which have different area codes indicating the age at which they got the numbers, not the geographical location.  Lastly, and this is a stretch (I agree), but VOIP has essentially made area codes irrelevant.  My number follows me around the world with Vonage and Skype.  Putting a coordinate on an article like this implies a false precision, regardless of how far out the map layer is zoomed.  [[User talk:7|<span style="background:#acf;padding:2px;color:white;text-shadow:black 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em">&nbsp;'''7'''&nbsp;</span>]] 03:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
10248 +++$+++ Elipongo +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10241 +++$+++ 10243 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.294401300E09 +++$+++ The fact that I've retained the 860 phone number on my cellphone since I've moved to NYC does not change the fact that, for the time being at least, that number traces back to a specific region of Connecticut. Area code borders are very distinct, just ask the residents of [[Marble Hill, Manhattan]] about having to switch their area code from 212 to 718 despite the neighborhood being politically part of Manhattan, just not physically. Yes the borders of congressional districts and area codes are changed sometimes, but the same can be said for parks, towns, cities, and nations! The point of the coord template is so that users can click it and get an idea of where in the world something is. Just because you know generally where the 860 area code is doesn't mean someone from California or Sri Lanka does.--&mdash; +++$+++ ::The fact that I've retained the 860 phone number on my cellphone since I've moved to NYC does not change the fact that, for the time being at least, that number traces back to a specific region of Connecticut. Area code borders are very distinct, just ask the residents of [[Marble Hill, Manhattan]] about having to switch their area code from 212 to 718 despite the neighborhood being politically part of Manhattan, just not physically. Yes the borders of congressional districts and area codes are changed sometimes, but the same can be said for parks, towns, cities, and nations! The point of the coord template is so that users can click it and get an idea of where in the world something is. Just because you know generally where the 860 area code is doesn't mean someone from California or Sri Lanka does.--&mdash;[[User:Elipongo|Elipongo]] <small>([[User talk:Elipongo|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Elipongo|contribs]])</small> 03:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
10249 +++$+++ 7 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10241 +++$+++ 10248 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.294401900E09 +++$+++ It appears that we disagree.  While there is specific mention of states and waterbodies, there is no mention of area codes in [[WP:COORD]].  Suggest we move further discussion to [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Geographical_coordinates|the project talk page]].  Regards,   +++$+++ :::It appears that we disagree.  While there is specific mention of states and waterbodies, there is no mention of area codes in [[WP:COORD]].  Suggest we move further discussion to [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Geographical_coordinates|the project talk page]].  Regards,  [[User talk:7|<span style="background:#acf;padding:2px;color:white;text-shadow:black 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em">&nbsp;'''7'''&nbsp;</span>]] 04:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
10250 +++$+++ Elipongo +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10241 +++$+++ 10243 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.294403220E09 +++$+++ Done. See [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#What articles should have coordinates?]] --&mdash; +++$+++ ::Done. See [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#What articles should have coordinates?]] --&mdash;[[User:Elipongo|Elipongo]] <small>([[User talk:Elipongo|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Elipongo|contribs]])</small> 04:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

272388 +++$+++ Bethefawn +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-17 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.137489180E09 +++$+++ Please cease reverting my talk page. I consider it vandalism. I have no quarrel with you. You can edit my words here to say something silly if you like, but this is how things snowball. You don't have to mind your own business, but kindly quit minding mine.  +++$+++ Please cease reverting my talk page. I consider it vandalism. I have no quarrel with you. You can edit my words here to say something silly if you like, but this is how things snowball. You don't have to mind your own business, but kindly quit minding mine. [[User:Bethefawn|Bethefawn]] 01:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
272389 +++$+++ Sarahe +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272388 +++$+++ 272388 +++$+++ 2006-01-18 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.137617160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your message. I wasn't online yesterday so haven't had the chance to reply sooner. However, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABethefawn&diff=35427258&oldid=35398541 Bishonen] has already said it all, as far as I am concerned. It is simply inappropriate to publish, on any Wiki talk page, slurs against another person. If that is what you are looking to do, I suggest you try [[Live Journal]] or something similar.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your message. I wasn't online yesterday so haven't had the chance to reply sooner. However, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABethefawn&diff=35427258&oldid=35398541 Bishonen] has already said it all, as far as I am concerned. It is simply inappropriate to publish, on any Wiki talk page, slurs against another person. If that is what you are looking to do, I suggest you try [[Live Journal]] or something similar. [[User:Sarahe|Sarah Ewart]] 12:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

534533 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534533 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-10 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.171128900E09 +++$+++ I'm just tired of them trying to whitewash history. They couldn't turn the tide so they did everything they could to keep memories of it positive rather than neutral. 'Tis stupid.  +++$+++ I'm just tired of them trying to whitewash history. They couldn't turn the tide so they did everything they could to keep memories of it positive rather than neutral. 'Tis stupid. [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 09:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
534534 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534533 +++$+++ 534533 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 10:12:00 +++$+++ 1.171131120E09 +++$+++ I just saw your comments about me on Elara's talkpage. *hugs* Steve Block's stepped up to the plate now, and with Elara's barnstar, I'm feeling much better. Thankyou for your concern!  +++$+++ :I just saw your comments about me on Elara's talkpage. *hugs* Steve Block's stepped up to the plate now, and with Elara's barnstar, I'm feeling much better. Thankyou for your concern! [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 10:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
534535 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534533 +++$+++ 534534 +++$+++ 2007-02-11 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.171258200E09 +++$+++ I think you and I ''have'' moved on, we keep being yanked back by other people. It's like being on the end of a bungee rope. Maybe you should pray for them ;)  +++$+++ ::I think you and I ''have'' moved on, we keep being yanked back by other people. It's like being on the end of a bungee rope. Maybe you should pray for them ;) [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 21:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
534536 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534533 +++$+++ 534535 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.171307820E09 +++$+++ You think I haven't made enough constructive edits now? Right. Anyway, it doesn't matter, I'm not going to stand for admin again. Somehow I was turned into a viciously incivil Muslim-hating POV warrior on the basis of two diffs, and I have no intention of dignifying that process again.  +++$+++ :::You think I haven't made enough constructive edits now? Right. Anyway, it doesn't matter, I'm not going to stand for admin again. Somehow I was turned into a viciously incivil Muslim-hating POV warrior on the basis of two diffs, and I have no intention of dignifying that process again. [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 11:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

10251 +++$+++ Eldumpo +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10251 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-18 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.295390220E09 +++$+++ Regarding this edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=1957_Africa_Cup_of_Nations&diff=403792937&oldid=402122109] where did you get the co-ordinates from and what is it supposed to be pointing to. Having checked Bing and Google the co-ordinates do not lead to a football stadium. Regards.  +++$+++ Regarding this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1957_Africa_Cup_of_Nations&diff=403792937&oldid=402122109] where did you get the co-ordinates from and what is it supposed to be pointing to. Having checked Bing and Google the co-ordinates do not lead to a football stadium. Regards. [[User:Eldumpo|Eldumpo]] ([[User talk:Eldumpo|talk]]) 14:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
10252 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10251 +++$+++ 10251 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.295403000E09 +++$+++ I got it from the Wikipedia-World databased generated by the geographic coordinates wikiproject on the German-language Wikipedia. Unfortunately, this does not seem to tie up with anything reasonable in this case. I'll investigate. --  +++$+++ :I got it from the Wikipedia-World databased generated by the geographic coordinates wikiproject on the German-language Wikipedia. Unfortunately, this does not seem to tie up with anything reasonable in this case. I'll investigate. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 18:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
10253 +++$+++ Eldumpo +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10251 +++$+++ 10252 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.295406120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for response, I note you'll investigate. However, we don't normally copy data across from other-language wikis do we, as they have different views on notability, inclusion etc and anything being added to the English wiki should be sourced outright? To be honest for an article on a tournament I would not normally expect to have a co-ordinate as they are played at multiple venues, although in this article there is an unsourced comment saying that the matches were held at the same ground but it would still seem consistent to not have a co-ord.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for response, I note you'll investigate. However, we don't normally copy data across from other-language wikis do we, as they have different views on notability, inclusion etc and anything being added to the English wiki should be sourced outright? To be honest for an article on a tournament I would not normally expect to have a co-ordinate as they are played at multiple venues, although in this article there is an unsourced comment saying that the matches were held at the same ground but it would still seem consistent to not have a co-ord. [[User:Eldumpo|Eldumpo]] ([[User talk:Eldumpo|talk]]) 19:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
10254 +++$+++ Eldumpo +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10251 +++$+++ 10253 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.296160440E09 +++$+++ Hi, have you had chance to look into this any further.  +++$+++ :::Hi, have you had chance to look into this any further. [[User:Eldumpo|Eldumpo]] ([[User talk:Eldumpo|talk]]) 12:34, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

272397 +++$+++ Ashibaka +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-05 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.139138520E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately I can't keep Dante\/Opy blocked because it turns out that he uses AOL. I am getting a lot of complaints to my e-mail as well as my talk page. I rolled back\/deleted his nonsense and listed him on [[WP:VIP]], and I'm awaiting a response.  +++$+++ Unfortunately I can't keep Dante/Opy blocked because it turns out that he uses AOL. I am getting a lot of complaints to my e-mail as well as my talk page. I rolled back/deleted his nonsense and listed him on [[WP:VIP]], and I'm awaiting a response. [[User:Ashibaka|Ashibaka]] <small>[[User talk:Ashibaka|tock]]</small> 03:22, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
272398 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272397 +++$+++ 272397 +++$+++ 2006-02-13 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.139834520E09 +++$+++ I don't know much about the \"fulco scorvella\" issue. My problem with you is your persistent insertion of [[copyright]] material you lifted from other websites. You persisted in doing this even after you were repeatedly told what you were doing was illegal and against Wikipedia policy. You also persisted in inserting phoney \"Italianised\" names into random articles and ignored all requests for you to provide sources.  +++$+++ :I don't know much about the "fulco scorvella" issue. My problem with you is your persistent insertion of [[copyright]] material you lifted from other websites. You persisted in doing this even after you were repeatedly told what you were doing was illegal and against Wikipedia policy. You also persisted in inserting phoney "Italianised" names into random articles and ignored all requests for you to provide sources. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 04:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
272399 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272397 +++$+++ 272397 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.140080400E09 +++$+++ I believe the other information you're complaining about was rolled-back by admins due to your persistent insertion of copyright and unsourced material, your insertion of fake \"italianised\" names into random articles, your hoax articles and your refusal to respond to warnings and requests for sources.  +++$+++ :I believe the other information you're complaining about was rolled-back by admins due to your persistent insertion of copyright and unsourced material, your insertion of fake "italianised" names into random articles, your hoax articles and your refusal to respond to warnings and requests for sources. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 01:00, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

534542 +++$+++ M3tal H3ad +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.171630740E09 +++$+++ Hello you failed this article because \"every statement needs a source\", Every statement is sourced. I use a reference to cover the entire paragraph, instead of using five of the same sources to cover statements in one paragraph, i hope that clears it up  +++$+++ Hello you failed this article because "every statement needs a source", Every statement is sourced. I use a reference to cover the entire paragraph, instead of using five of the same sources to cover statements in one paragraph, i hope that clears it up [[User:M3tal H3ad|M3tal H3ad]] 04:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
534543 +++$+++ LuciferMorgan +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534542 +++$+++ 534542 +++$+++ 2007-02-19 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.171954740E09 +++$+++ Jeff Hanneman also needs another look, an article you placed on GA hold.  +++$+++ :Jeff Hanneman also needs another look, an article you placed on GA hold. [[User:LuciferMorgan|LuciferMorgan]] 22:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
534544 +++$+++ M3tal H3ad +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534542 +++$+++ 534543 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.172082840E09 +++$+++ Added more sources for both.  +++$+++ ::Added more sources for both. [[User:M3tal H3ad|M3tal H3ad]] 10:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

10260 +++$+++ Tom Morris +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-30 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.296450660E09 +++$+++ You put a Requested Photo tag on [[Mecklenburgh Square]]. I took a photo today and put it up on Commons ([[commons:File:Mecklenburgh_Square.jpeg]]) and have added it to the article. I've removed the template from the talk page. Enjoy! \u2013\u2014 +++$+++ You put a Requested Photo tag on [[Mecklenburgh Square]]. I took a photo today and put it up on Commons ([[commons:File:Mecklenburgh_Square.jpeg]]) and have added it to the article. I've removed the template from the talk page. Enjoy! –—[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 21:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
10261 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10260 +++$+++ 10260 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.296623460E09 +++$+++ Thank you! That's really cool! --  +++$+++ :Thank you! That's really cool! -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 21:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

534550 +++$+++ Kranar drogin +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-25 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.172473200E09 +++$+++ I was wondering DoomsDay, if you would be able to review a couple articles for the Illinois Wiki project that have been put up for Good article review. [[University of Illinois Observatory]] and [[DeKalb County Courthouse (Illinois)]] are both up for review, if you don't have the time or desire, you don't have to do it. Just figured I would ask since it seems you do reviews a lot.-- +++$+++ I was wondering DoomsDay, if you would be able to review a couple articles for the Illinois Wiki project that have been put up for Good article review. [[University of Illinois Observatory]] and [[DeKalb County Courthouse (Illinois)]] are both up for review, if you don't have the time or desire, you don't have to do it. Just figured I would ask since it seems you do reviews a lot.--[[User:Kranar drogin|Kranar drogin]] 23:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
534551 +++$+++ Kranar drogin +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534550 +++$+++ 534550 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.172488440E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the assistance man, we have a lot of articles that need to be reviewed, would you mind if I send them your way? They are going to be mainly historical right now, but we are working on revamping [[Springfield, Illinois]].-- +++$+++ :I appreciate the assistance man, we have a lot of articles that need to be reviewed, would you mind if I send them your way? They are going to be mainly historical right now, but we are working on revamping [[Springfield, Illinois]].--[[User:Kranar drogin|Kranar drogin]] 03:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
534552 +++$+++ Kranar drogin +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534550 +++$+++ 534551 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.172959260E09 +++$+++ I have another one here [[Joseph F. Glidden House]] that is up for good article review.-- +++$+++ ::I have another one here [[Joseph F. Glidden House]] that is up for good article review.--[[User:Kranar drogin|Kranar drogin]] 14:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
534553 +++$+++ Kranar drogin +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534550 +++$+++ 534552 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.172962500E09 +++$+++ This one on the [[Oregon Commercial Historic District]] might be up for a \"B\" rating. Thoughts?-- +++$+++ :::This one on the [[Oregon Commercial Historic District]] might be up for a "B" rating. Thoughts?--[[User:Kranar drogin|Kranar drogin]] 14:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

272407 +++$+++ SilverWings +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-24 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.143233640E09 +++$+++ Sarah, thanks for your editorial work on this article after our disagreement over it!  Much appreciated...  and very thorough, which is consistent with what else I have seen of your work.  You went to a good deal of trouble to track down other citations.  I have amended the layout of the footnote citations to bring them into line with a more standard approach - it is normal to place article or chapter titles in double quotes, while the title of the whole work in which it is found is normally italicised.  I'd be happy to find a style guide for this if you would like.  I was interested that you saw fit to remove my concluding paragraph - I wasn't particularly fussed to have that remain, and in fact it was only in there to satisfy earlier demands for justifiation of the article.  If anything, it might belong in the article's talk page, where you have placed it, for future reference of anyone else who might question the significance of this case.  I'd be interested in which statements you would like to have supported, as they will be found in the original article I cited.  Oh, when I get a chance I will add page refs for the articles you cited, since apparently you haven't retrieved them from Factiva.  Anyway, thanks for your constructive approach to the article's remaining.  All the best...  -- +++$+++ Sarah, thanks for your editorial work on this article after our disagreement over it!  Much appreciated...  and very thorough, which is consistent with what else I have seen of your work.  You went to a good deal of trouble to track down other citations.  I have amended the layout of the footnote citations to bring them into line with a more standard approach - it is normal to place article or chapter titles in double quotes, while the title of the whole work in which it is found is normally italicised.  I'd be happy to find a style guide for this if you would like.  I was interested that you saw fit to remove my concluding paragraph - I wasn't particularly fussed to have that remain, and in fact it was only in there to satisfy earlier demands for justifiation of the article.  If anything, it might belong in the article's talk page, where you have placed it, for future reference of anyone else who might question the significance of this case.  I'd be interested in which statements you would like to have supported, as they will be found in the original article I cited.  Oh, when I get a chance I will add page refs for the articles you cited, since apparently you haven't retrieved them from Factiva.  Anyway, thanks for your constructive approach to the article's remaining.  All the best...  --[[User:SilverWings|SilverWings]] 12:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
272408 +++$+++ SilverWings +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272407 +++$+++ 272407 +++$+++ 2006-03-24 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.143236340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the quick feedback, Sarah.  I have now added the citation for the remaining fact which needed supporting.  I'm glad that you found all the others in the articles you found, since all of them were also in the ''Courier-Mail'' article.  I think there was just the one additional note needed, unless I have overlooked something?  Thanks again...  -- +++$+++ : Thanks for the quick feedback, Sarah.  I have now added the citation for the remaining fact which needed supporting.  I'm glad that you found all the others in the articles you found, since all of them were also in the ''Courier-Mail'' article.  I think there was just the one additional note needed, unless I have overlooked something?  Thanks again...  --[[User:SilverWings|SilverWings]] 13:39, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

10264 +++$+++ The Egyptian Liberal +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-11 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.297475160E09 +++$+++ I completely agree with you. The discussing has started on the 28th of Jan. with no result and kept popping up and two or three user will discuss it and then another three will discuss in a new section with no result. It was going nowhere. I asking admins to step in otherwise, this will never end. We need an admin right now. If you know one please, speak to them. --  +++$+++ I completely agree with you. The discussing has started on the 28th of Jan. with no result and kept popping up and two or three user will discuss it and then another three will discuss in a new section with no result. It was going nowhere. I asking admins to step in otherwise, this will never end. We need an admin right now. If you know one please, speak to them. -- [[User:The Egyptian Liberal|The Egyptian Liberal]] ([[User talk:The Egyptian Liberal|talk]]) 17:46, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
10265 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10264 +++$+++ 10264 +++$+++ 2011-02-11 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.297475520E09 +++$+++ I'm an admin. Although I'm in favour of the move, it would be inappropriate for me to move the article just because I think it's a good idea -- we need to let the formal renaming process continue, and see what comes of that. In order to do that, we need to keep the discussion all in one place on the article's talk page, and not refactor it anywhere else. --  +++$+++ :I'm an admin. Although I'm in favour of the move, it would be inappropriate for me to move the article just because I think it's a good idea -- we need to let the formal renaming process continue, and see what comes of that. In order to do that, we need to keep the discussion all in one place on the article's talk page, and not refactor it anywhere else. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 17:52, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

272410 +++$+++ 2006BC +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272410 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-18 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.142688540E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:2006BC|2006BC]] 05:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
272411 +++$+++ 2006BC +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272410 +++$+++ 272410 +++$+++ 2006-03-18 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.142705580E09 +++$+++ OK, cool. Where do we start? -- +++$+++ : OK, cool. Where do we start? --[[User:2006BC|2006BC]] 10:13, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

263855 +++$+++ Lakki Marwat +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-03 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.162616820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Lakki Marwat|Lakki Marwat]] 21:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
263856 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263855 +++$+++ 263855 +++$+++ 2006-11-08 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.163033820E09 +++$+++ When he ''is'' important, and meets the criteria at [[WP:MUSIC]], then he can have his article. Until then, mySpace will be the best place to promote him.  +++$+++ :When he ''is'' important, and meets the criteria at [[WP:MUSIC]], then he can have his article. Until then, mySpace will be the best place to promote him. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

10268 +++$+++ Bonzon +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-18 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.298070300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Bonzon|Bonzon]] ([[User talk:Bonzon|talk]]) 15:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
10269 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10268 +++$+++ 10268 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.298230860E09 +++$+++ I do (or try to). These weren't recognized as such because they were in scientific notation, and also not exactly at zero-zero. As far as I can see, these were the only three tags added by my bot which match the regexp \"[0-9][Ee]-\", so that should have got them all. I'll add some more rules to exclude this type of tag in future -- we shouldn't be using scientific notation in coordinates at all. --  +++$+++ :I do (or try to). These weren't recognized as such because they were in scientific notation, and also not exactly at zero-zero. As far as I can see, these were the only three tags added by my bot which match the regexp "[0-9][Ee]-", so that should have got them all. I'll add some more rules to exclude this type of tag in future -- we shouldn't be using scientific notation in coordinates at all. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 11:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
10270 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10268 +++$+++ 10269 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.298232720E09 +++$+++ Done. --  +++$+++ ::Done. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 12:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

89093 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89093 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-16 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.297880400E09 +++$+++ Hi, if you have time, perhaps you can help that this dispute is solved: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Nedi\u0107_regime User:DIREKTOR claims that there was no political entity with name \"Serbia\" during WW2. Here, I collected sources that claiming otherwise: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:PANONIAN\/Sources02 However, user:DIREKTOR is simply ignoring these sources and pushing idea that term \"Nedi\u0107 regime\" was not just name of regime, but also name of territory in which this regime governed. He, however did not presented a single source that claim that \"Nedi\u0107 regime\" was a name of a territory. I do not want to be involved in disruptive revert war with him, but I do not know what else to do instead to ask for help from administrators. I do not know how to deal with user who ignoring sources and who pushing unsourced claims, and who also cannot stop himself from revert warring. Please help with this problem, if you have free time.  +++$+++ Hi, if you have time, perhaps you can help that this dispute is solved: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nedić_regime User:DIREKTOR claims that there was no political entity with name "Serbia" during WW2. Here, I collected sources that claiming otherwise: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PANONIAN/Sources02 However, user:DIREKTOR is simply ignoring these sources and pushing idea that term "Nedić regime" was not just name of regime, but also name of territory in which this regime governed. He, however did not presented a single source that claim that "Nedić regime" was a name of a territory. I do not want to be involved in disruptive revert war with him, but I do not know what else to do instead to ask for help from administrators. I do not know how to deal with user who ignoring sources and who pushing unsourced claims, and who also cannot stop himself from revert warring. Please help with this problem, if you have free time. [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] 10:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
89094 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89093 +++$+++ 89093 +++$+++ 2011-02-17 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.297933560E09 +++$+++ Thought I must have missed it somewhere! You're too kmuch an 'old hand\" at this sort of thing to fall foul of the \"stub nazis\" ;)  +++$+++ :Thought I must have missed it somewhere! You're too kmuch an 'old hand" at this sort of thing to fall foul of the "stub nazis" ;) [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 01:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

10272 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-09 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.299702840E09 +++$+++ A reply please?\u2666  +++$+++ A reply please?♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 12:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
10273 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10272 +++$+++ 10272 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.299703260E09 +++$+++ Hello! Sorry about the delay in getting back to you. Can you give me some links to the missing articles pages containing these coordinates? Have you spot-checked any of them for accuracy? If so, and if I can easily data-mine the coordinates from those pages, I'd be happy to put them into the articles using my bot. --  +++$+++ :Hello! Sorry about the delay in getting back to you. Can you give me some links to the missing articles pages containing these coordinates? Have you spot-checked any of them for accuracy? If so, and if I can easily data-mine the coordinates from those pages, I'd be happy to put them into the articles using my bot. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 12:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

534562 +++$+++ S. Miyano +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534562 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.174329060E09 +++$+++ How does a user become a reviewer of good article candidates? Can any editor list himself as a GA reviewer or are there any requirements? Please reply here on your talk page. Thanks  +++$+++ How does a user become a reviewer of good article candidates? Can any editor list himself as a GA reviewer or are there any requirements? Please reply here on your talk page. Thanks [[User:S. Miyano|S. Miyano]] 11:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
534563 +++$+++ S. Miyano +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534562 +++$+++ 534562 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.174507740E09 +++$+++ Hi again, I've been waiting for your response, sorry if you're busy, but when you have some free time later ''please'' make a comment. I still keep your page on watch  +++$+++ :Hi again, I've been waiting for your response, sorry if you're busy, but when you have some free time later ''please'' make a comment. I still keep your page on watch [[User:S. Miyano|S. Miyano]] 13:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
534564 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534562 +++$+++ 534563 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.174532760E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the slow response.  There's no requirement, just read the criteria page and you're good to go.  The best way to do it is experience. '''''<font color=\"darkblue\"> +++$+++ ::Sorry for the slow response.  There's no requirement, just read the criteria page and you're good to go.  The best way to do it is experience. '''''<font color="darkblue">[[User:DoomsDay349|Dooms]]</font><font color="lightblue">[[User talk:DoomsDay349|Day349]]</font>''''' 20:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

10275 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-11 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.299877320E09 +++$+++ I'll do Afghanistan and Bangladesh. Burma I will be starting too although that doesn't have any lists on here but should have entries in the geonames database..\u2666  +++$+++ I'll do Afghanistan and Bangladesh. Burma I will be starting too although that doesn't have any lists on here but should have entries in the geonames database..♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 13:02, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
10276 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10275 +++$+++ 10275 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.299877740E09 +++$+++ I've just double-checked the lists, and found a fair degree of name duplication, which suggests that there are still disambiguation problems -- I've now gone over the lists again, and only generated entries for those articles with only one occurrence in those lists. I've now reverted the edits already made to the articles with questionable coordinates, and will set the bot off again in a moment. --  +++$+++ :I've just double-checked the lists, and found a fair degree of name duplication, which suggests that there are still disambiguation problems -- I've now gone over the lists again, and only generated entries for those articles with only one occurrence in those lists. I've now reverted the edits already made to the articles with questionable coordinates, and will set the bot off again in a moment. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 13:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

534565 +++$+++ CaptainPuma +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534565 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.174330680E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:CaptainPuma|CaptainPuma]] 11:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
534566 +++$+++ CaptainPuma +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534565 +++$+++ 534565 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.174332780E09 +++$+++ Aaand the first questions have already come up: How do I add\/remove translations from \"In progress\"? How do I add the permanent link to the article's translation page? -- +++$+++ :Aaand the first questions have already come up: How do I add/remove translations from "In progress"? How do I add the permanent link to the article's translation page? --[[User:CaptainPuma|CaptainPuma]] 12:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
534567 +++$+++  +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534565 +++$+++ 534566 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Sorry for not making myself clear. On the Translation Project pages there's a section called \"In progress\" for translations in progress. But no matter, I figured it out in the end. Thanks anyway! 08:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ ::Sorry for not making myself clear. On the Translation Project pages there's a section called "In progress" for translations in progress. But no matter, I figured it out in the end. Thanks anyway! 08:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

272422 +++$+++ Ian Rose +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-26 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.140942240E09 +++$+++ Hello Sarah, congrats on your [[Sallie-Anne Huckstepp]] article and the [[Roger Rogerson]] update. Just wanted to let you know that I'm also interested in this area (done minor clean-ups of the existing Neddy Smith and Roger Rogerson ones without really expanding them) and that perhaps we could work together or at least stay across each other's contributions. I'm midway through a draft of a new article for the ''Blue Murder'' show and was planning to more fully update the [[Neddy Smith]] article.  I see you were planning a Chris Flannery article - which I look fwd to - and seems to me with your knowledge of Huckstepp you'd be the logical person to pen a Warren Lanfranchi article.  Anyway, let me know your thoughts... Cheers,  +++$+++ Hello Sarah, congrats on your [[Sallie-Anne Huckstepp]] article and the [[Roger Rogerson]] update. Just wanted to let you know that I'm also interested in this area (done minor clean-ups of the existing Neddy Smith and Roger Rogerson ones without really expanding them) and that perhaps we could work together or at least stay across each other's contributions. I'm midway through a draft of a new article for the ''Blue Murder'' show and was planning to more fully update the [[Neddy Smith]] article.  I see you were planning a Chris Flannery article - which I look fwd to - and seems to me with your knowledge of Huckstepp you'd be the logical person to pen a Warren Lanfranchi article.  Anyway, let me know your thoughts... Cheers, [[User:Ian Rose|Ian Rose]] 00:24, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
272423 +++$+++ Ian Rose +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272422 +++$+++ 272422 +++$+++ 2006-02-26 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.140945780E09 +++$+++ Hi again Sarah, re. stepping on toes with Neddy Smith, no not at all, I hadn't stated my update yet.  Thought I'd done a little clean-up of it previously as I did with Rogerson but obviously didn't save it (happens now and then, I tend to have two or three related articles open at once and now and then forget one of 'em).  I might look at Abo Henry or Mick Drury after I finish ''Blue Murder''.  Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi again Sarah, re. stepping on toes with Neddy Smith, no not at all, I hadn't stated my update yet.  Thought I'd done a little clean-up of it previously as I did with Rogerson but obviously didn't save it (happens now and then, I tend to have two or three related articles open at once and now and then forget one of 'em).  I might look at Abo Henry or Mick Drury after I finish ''Blue Murder''.  Cheers, [[User:Ian Rose|Ian Rose]] 01:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
272424 +++$+++ Ian Rose +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272422 +++$+++ 272423 +++$+++ 2006-02-28 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.141189260E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah...  Steve Bastioni, eh?  I'm impressed!  Many thanks re. the Drury book - I should have a copy I can dig out but good to have your offer too just in case.  Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Hi Sarah...  Steve Bastioni, eh?  I'm impressed!  Many thanks re. the Drury book - I should have a copy I can dig out but good to have your offer too just in case.  Cheers, [[User:Ian Rose|Ian Rose]] 21:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
272425 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272422 +++$+++ 272423 +++$+++ 2006-02-26 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.140981600E09 +++$+++ As another Australian crime writer here at Wikipedia, I'd like to say well done on your contributions. They're all top rate. --  +++$+++ ::As another Australian crime writer here at Wikipedia, I'd like to say well done on your contributions. They're all top rate. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 11:20, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
272426 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272422 +++$+++ 272425 +++$+++ 2006-02-26 11:34:00 +++$+++ 1.140982440E09 +++$+++ Your contributions are nice. You deserve the praise. Nice work with Flannery. He was next on my list. I can take a day off now ;) --  +++$+++ :::Your contributions are nice. You deserve the praise. Nice work with Flannery. He was next on my list. I can take a day off now ;) -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 11:34, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
272427 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272422 +++$+++ 272422 +++$+++ 2006-02-28 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.141193880E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry but I'm just not interested, Dante. I gave you the benefit of the doubt last time and you repaid me by continuing your vandalism. I warned you that Zoe was not an idiot. I'm glad she's not responding to you. Please stop wasting my time.  +++$+++ :I'm sorry but I'm just not interested, Dante. I gave you the benefit of the doubt last time and you repaid me by continuing your vandalism. I warned you that Zoe was not an idiot. I'm glad she's not responding to you. Please stop wasting my time. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 22:18, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

526001 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-13 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.150196820E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the update.  I uploaded a new image in the article of Lt. Gen. [[Pedro del Valle]].  In this image General Pedro del Valle is greeted by Col. [[Chesty Puller]].  When I found this image, I told myself \"Man, this is cool\".  Hell I would have loved to have met them both.  Tell me what you think of the image.   +++$+++ Thank you for the update.  I uploaded a new image in the article of Lt. Gen. [[Pedro del Valle]].  In this image General Pedro del Valle is greeted by Col. [[Chesty Puller]].  When I found this image, I told myself "Man, this is cool".  Hell I would have loved to have met them both.  Tell me what you think of the image.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
526002 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526001 +++$+++ 526001 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.150199280E09 +++$+++ I was doing some research in the public library when I came upon the photo.  It was taken on October 1944.  Major General Pedro del Valle was to replace Major General Rupertus (who was also pictured) as commander and Col. Chesty Puller was the official greeter.   +++$+++ *I was doing some research in the public library when I came upon the photo.  It was taken on October 1944.  Major General Pedro del Valle was to replace Major General Rupertus (who was also pictured) as commander and Col. Chesty Puller was the official greeter.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:48, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
526003 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526001 +++$+++ 526002 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.150285020E09 +++$+++ Response: Thanks for the info.  I've added some thoughts on your talk page. &mdash; +++$+++ :* Response: Thanks for the info.  I've added some thoughts on your talk page. &mdash;[[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) @ 04:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

10280 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-27 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.301275740E09 +++$+++ Will resume with Afghanistan this week, if not later tonight...\u2666  +++$+++ Will resume with Afghanistan this week, if not later tonight...♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 18:29, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
10281 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10280 +++$+++ 10280 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.301300400E09 +++$+++ Thanks! --  +++$+++ :Thanks! -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 01:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

351239 +++$+++ Slambo +++$+++ Slambo +++$+++ 351239 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-07 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.234054680E09 +++$+++ I'm having a harder time than I thought at allocating time to update this template.  The homework assignments from school as well as household emergencies (we had a pipe burst two weeks ago and we're still cleaning up from it) and the Featured Article Review (see below) have all taken more time than I had anticipated.  Take a look at [[User:Slambo\/RailGauge|my test area for this template]] to see what I have been able to get done.  Feel free to play with the template there and fix any mistakes that I have made.  Once we have a good copy there, we can copy\/paste the final edits to the live template.  +++$+++ I'm having a harder time than I thought at allocating time to update this template.  The homework assignments from school as well as household emergencies (we had a pipe burst two weeks ago and we're still cleaning up from it) and the Featured Article Review (see below) have all taken more time than I had anticipated.  Take a look at [[User:Slambo/RailGauge|my test area for this template]] to see what I have been able to get done.  Feel free to play with the template there and fix any mistakes that I have made.  Once we have a good copy there, we can copy/paste the final edits to the live template. [[User:Slambo|Slambo]] <small><font color="black">[[User talk:Slambo|(Speak)]]</font></small> 16:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
351240 +++$+++ Peter Horn +++$+++ Slambo +++$+++ 351239 +++$+++ 351239 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.241576580E09 +++$+++ I \"guess\" some are still pending.  +++$+++ : I "guess" some are still pending. [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] 19:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
351241 +++$+++ Peter Horn +++$+++ Slambo +++$+++ 351239 +++$+++ 351239 +++$+++ 2009-05-25 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.243244760E09 +++$+++ One more, {{RailGauge|765mm}} instead of {{convert|765|mm|ftin|1|abbr=on}}  +++$+++ : One more, {{RailGauge|765mm}} instead of {{convert|765|mm|ftin|1|abbr=on}} [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] 02:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
351242 +++$+++ Peter Horn +++$+++ Slambo +++$+++ 351239 +++$+++ 351241 +++$+++ 2009-07-24 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.248482040E09 +++$+++ The above \"gem\" I had found in [[Transport in the Democratic Republic of the Congo#Railways]] and [[Rail transport in the Democratic Republic of the Congo]]. However, [[Matadi-Kinshasa Railway#Specifications]] gives {{RailGauge|762}} so I posted a note at [[Talk:Matadi-Kinshasa Railway#Clarification needed]].  +++$+++ ::The above "gem" I had found in [[Transport in the Democratic Republic of the Congo#Railways]] and [[Rail transport in the Democratic Republic of the Congo]]. However, [[Matadi-Kinshasa Railway#Specifications]] gives {{RailGauge|762}} so I posted a note at [[Talk:Matadi-Kinshasa Railway#Clarification needed]]. [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] [[User talk:Peter Horn|User talk]] 17:34, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
351243 +++$+++ Peter Horn +++$+++ Slambo +++$+++ 351239 +++$+++ 351239 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.248342480E09 +++$+++ Slambo, Please see my additions at the end of [[Template talk:RailGauge#Please add & insert some more]] and I'll be posting some additional ones there later.  +++$+++ : Slambo, Please see my additions at the end of [[Template talk:RailGauge#Please add & insert some more]] and I'll be posting some additional ones there later. [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] [[User talk:Peter Horn|User talk]] 02:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

10285 +++$+++ Pi.1415926535 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-27 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.301272320E09 +++$+++ Thanks once again; the bot always keeps me busy with articles to geocoordinate.  +++$+++ Thanks once again; the bot always keeps me busy with articles to geocoordinate. [[User:Pi.1415926535|Pi.1415926535]] ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|talk]]) 17:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
10286 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10285 +++$+++ 10285 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.301300400E09 +++$+++ Thanks! --  +++$+++ :Thanks! -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 01:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

534575 +++$+++ Ddcc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-26 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.174908120E09 +++$+++ What do you think of [http:\/\/www.pathguy.com\/krynn.htm this] page? <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ What do you think of [http://www.pathguy.com/krynn.htm this] page? <font color="blue">[[User:Ddcc|'''D''']]</font><font color="green">[[User talk:Ddcc|''dc'']]</font><font color="black">[[Special:Emailuser/Ddcc|'''c''']]</font> 04:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
534576 +++$+++ Ddcc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534575 +++$+++ 534575 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.174908300E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.geocities.com\/skie-the-1st This] one isn't too bad either. <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :[http://www.geocities.com/skie-the-1st This] one isn't too bad either. <font color="blue">[[User:Ddcc|'''D''']]</font><font color="green">[[User talk:Ddcc|''dc'']]</font><font color="black">[[Special:Emailuser/Ddcc|'''c''']]</font> 04:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

10288 +++$+++ Crusoe8181 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-01 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.301675580E09 +++$+++ Hello, the bot has a miserable success rate for coords of towns, LGAs in Nigeria recently; not surprising as there are numerous names corresponding to dozens of places. I will be contributing (accurate) coords, pushpin maps for all the LGAs I haven't already done, and  many towns, shortly, so would suggest you shut down the bot in this area for a bit. Regards  +++$+++ Hello, the bot has a miserable success rate for coords of towns, LGAs in Nigeria recently; not surprising as there are numerous names corresponding to dozens of places. I will be contributing (accurate) coords, pushpin maps for all the LGAs I haven't already done, and  many towns, shortly, so would suggest you shut down the bot in this area for a bit. Regards [[User:Crusoe8181|Crusoe8181]] ([[User talk:Crusoe8181|talk]]) 09:33, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
10289 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10288 +++$+++ 10288 +++$+++ 2011-04-05 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.302009060E09 +++$+++ I've now stopped the auto-generation of locations for Nigeria place articles, and rolled back all such geotags recently added by the bot that have not subsequently been altered by other editors. --  +++$+++ :I've now stopped the auto-generation of locations for Nigeria place articles, and rolled back all such geotags recently added by the bot that have not subsequently been altered by other editors. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 06:11, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

534577 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-28 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.175145660E09 +++$+++ Basically, I think that the paragraph is biased, Dev thinks otherwise.--''''' +++$+++ Basically, I think that the paragraph is biased, Dev thinks otherwise.--'''''[[User:Ed|<font color="blue" face="comic sans ms">Ed</font>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Ed|<font color="maroon" face="comic sans ms">¿Cómo estás?</font>]]</sup> 22:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
534578 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534577 +++$+++ 534577 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.175147100E09 +++$+++ I've proposed a truce to Dev. (see talk page) I definitely want this to end as much as you do. ;) ''''' +++$+++ :I've proposed a truce to Dev. (see talk page) I definitely want this to end as much as you do. ;) '''''[[User:Ed|<font color="blue" face="comic sans ms">Ed</font>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Ed|<font color="maroon" face="comic sans ms">¿Cómo estás?</font>]]</sup> 22:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
534579 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534577 +++$+++ 534578 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.175147580E09 +++$+++ Dev just accepted truce...is there a place that you already have for discussions?--''''' +++$+++ ::Dev just accepted truce...is there a place that you already have for discussions?--'''''[[User:Ed|<font color="blue" face="comic sans ms">Ed</font>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Ed|<font color="maroon" face="comic sans ms">¿Cómo estás?</font>]]</sup> 22:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

10290 +++$+++ Jason Quinn +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10290 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-04 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.301952660E09 +++$+++ Anome bot added a coord missing tag to [[Don't touch my junk]], which makes little sense. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Don%27t_touch_my_junk&diff=422251084&oldid=419973914]  +++$+++ Anome bot added a coord missing tag to [[Don't touch my junk]], which makes little sense. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Don%27t_touch_my_junk&diff=422251084&oldid=419973914] [[User:Jason Quinn|Jason Quinn]] ([[User talk:Jason Quinn|talk]]) 14:31, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
10291 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10290 +++$+++ 10290 +++$+++ 2011-04-05 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.302008940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for spotting it and fixing it. The simple-minded bot thought it was an airport, because it was listed under [[:Category:Airports in the United States]] without containing any features that would have hit the blacklist it uses to try to detect non-place articles. Althogh the bot should not attempt to add the tag again, I've re-categorised the article under [[:Category:Aviation in the United States]], which is I think in any case a clearer and more appropriate category for this article. --  +++$+++ :Thanks for spotting it and fixing it. The simple-minded bot thought it was an airport, because it was listed under [[:Category:Airports in the United States]] without containing any features that would have hit the blacklist it uses to try to detect non-place articles. Althogh the bot should not attempt to add the tag again, I've re-categorised the article under [[:Category:Aviation in the United States]], which is I think in any case a clearer and more appropriate category for this article. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 06:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

10292 +++$+++ Hobart +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10292 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-10 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.302503280E09 +++$+++ Hello! It looks like your bot's source for coordinates for [[Smrije\u010dje]] claims that the village is floating in the ocean near the Prime Meridian and the Equator.  And Google Maps is faithfully rendering it out there. :-)  I have removed this assertion from the English Wikipedia, but the French Wikipedia seems to be taking its lat \/ lon info from somewhere other than the article itself -- any thoughts on how to fix this?  &mdash; +++$+++ Hello! It looks like your bot's source for coordinates for [[Smriječje]] claims that the village is floating in the ocean near the Prime Meridian and the Equator.  And Google Maps is faithfully rendering it out there. :-)  I have removed this assertion from the English Wikipedia, but the French Wikipedia seems to be taking its lat / lon info from somewhere other than the article itself -- any thoughts on how to fix this?  &mdash;[[User:Hobart|Hobart]] ([[User_talk:Hobart|talk]]) 23:28, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
10293 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10292 +++$+++ 10292 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.302538200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for catching that: zero-zero coordinates are a real pain to remove, as I'm constantly surprised by how many variants there can be for expressing them (for example, the recent ones that used scientific notation). I'll take a look to see if I can find any similar ones that slipped through. --  +++$+++ :Thanks for catching that: zero-zero coordinates are a real pain to remove, as I'm constantly surprised by how many variants there can be for expressing them (for example, the recent ones that used scientific notation). I'll take a look to see if I can find any similar ones that slipped through. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 09:10, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
10294 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10292 +++$+++ 10292 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 09:27:00 +++$+++ 1.302539220E09 +++$+++ After taking a quick look, the fr: article template (from which the original coordinates were scraped) seems to default to a weird 0.01 degrees when latitude or longitude is missing. This is truly weird. I've now fixed both articles by hand, using coordinates from the NGA GNS database. --  +++$+++ :After taking a quick look, the fr: article template (from which the original coordinates were scraped) seems to default to a weird 0.01 degrees when latitude or longitude is missing. This is truly weird. I've now fixed both articles by hand, using coordinates from the NGA GNS database. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 09:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
10295 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10292 +++$+++ 10292 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.302539400E09 +++$+++ And, after reviewing my logs, there were 67 similar cases of 00 00 06 N 00 00 06 E coordinates copied from frwiki by my bot. I'll see what I can do to fix these. --  +++$+++ :And, after reviewing my logs, there were 67 similar cases of 00 00 06 N 00 00 06 E coordinates copied from frwiki by my bot. I'll see what I can do to fix these. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 09:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
10296 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10292 +++$+++ 10292 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.302543480E09 +++$+++ {{done}} I've now wound all of these back to {{tl|coord missing}} tags, with the exception of [[Ljenobud]], which I've geocoded. --  +++$+++ :{{done}} I've now wound all of these back to {{tl|coord missing}} tags, with the exception of [[Ljenobud]], which I've geocoded. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 10:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
10297 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10292 +++$+++ 10292 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.302544860E09 +++$+++ A bit more manual log-grepping revealed a dozen or so more similar errors: however, all of these had already been fixed, by myself or others. --  +++$+++ :A bit more manual log-grepping revealed a dozen or so more similar errors: however, all of these had already been fixed, by myself or others. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 11:01, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

272437 +++$+++ Siddhartha21 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272437 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-07 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.141755780E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the suggestion however I\u2019ve frequently discussed this issue in talk section. Surely you must have discussed your recent edit in the talk page also.  +++$+++ I appreciate the suggestion however I’ve frequently discussed this issue in talk section. Surely you must have discussed your recent edit in the talk page also. [[User:Siddhartha21|Siddhartha21]] 10:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
272438 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272437 +++$+++ 272437 +++$+++ 2006-03-07 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.141756020E09 +++$+++ My edit was to maintain the status quo. I was not changing content against consensus. Nor was I edit warring.  +++$+++ :My edit was to maintain the status quo. I was not changing content against consensus. Nor was I edit warring. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 10:27, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

272439 +++$+++ Siddhartha21 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-07 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.141756860E09 +++$+++ If an issue is disputed, it will be edited accordingly and this issue is in fact disputed.  +++$+++ If an issue is disputed, it will be edited accordingly and this issue is in fact disputed. [[User:Siddhartha21|Siddhartha21]] 10:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
272440 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272439 +++$+++ 272439 +++$+++ 2006-03-07 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.141757220E09 +++$+++ Then address it on the talk page. The other editors appear to have reached a consensus which does not support your editing. In the last day-and-a-half or so, you've removed the same words 6 times, with no contributions to the talk page. Edit warring is bad.  +++$+++ :Then address it on the talk page. The other editors appear to have reached a consensus which does not support your editing. In the last day-and-a-half or so, you've removed the same words 6 times, with no contributions to the talk page. Edit warring is bad. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 10:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

272441 +++$+++ Siddhartha21 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-07 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.141758120E09 +++$+++ Well considering I was the last person to comment on this in the discussion area, there is little to be gained by replying to myself.  +++$+++ Well considering I was the last person to comment on this in the discussion area, there is little to be gained by replying to myself. [[User:Siddhartha21|Siddhartha21]] 11:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
272442 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272441 +++$+++ 272441 +++$+++ 2006-03-07 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.141758660E09 +++$+++ The other editors have reached a consensus; you need to work with them instead of trying to impose and enforce your own POV. As it is your edits are only lasting for a short while before they get reverted. You're just wasting your time.  +++$+++ :The other editors have reached a consensus; you need to work with them instead of trying to impose and enforce your own POV. As it is your edits are only lasting for a short while before they get reverted. You're just wasting your time. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 11:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

10299 +++$+++ Buttercrumbs +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10299 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-18 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.303136940E09 +++$+++ A thread has been started about the mass removal of Wisegeeks links which you are involved with.  +++$+++ A thread has been started about the mass removal of Wisegeeks links which you are involved with. [[User:Buttercrumbs|Buttercrumbs]] ([[User talk:Buttercrumbs|talk]]) 07:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
10300 +++$+++ ErrantX +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10299 +++$+++ 10299 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.303166280E09 +++$+++ That way the i's are dotted and the t's are crossed :) --''' +++$+++ :That way the i's are dotted and the t's are crossed :) --'''[[user:ErrantX|Errant]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:ErrantX|chat!]])</sup> 15:38, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

10301 +++$+++ BrittyGirl +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-28 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.303993620E09 +++$+++ Hello, I'm not a great wikipedia-er so excuse me if I'm writing this in the wrong place. I believe my article on Chris 'TEK' O'Ryan was deleted unfairly. He is a Grammy-Award winning sound engineer (I have seen the trophy) and this can be verified by The Recording Academy. As he was not the artist but the recording engineer there was little or no press about it. He is an industry leader, at the top level of his field and his name is on millions of platinum selling records around the world. He is endorsed by major music software companies such as Waves and Melodyne (see interviews). He was also shown on television recently working in the studio with the top 12 contestants on this years American Idol. I don't understand how he is not worthy of an article. +++$+++ Hello, I'm not a great wikipedia-er so excuse me if I'm writing this in the wrong place. I believe my article on Chris 'TEK' O'Ryan was deleted unfairly. He is a Grammy-Award winning sound engineer (I have seen the trophy) and this can be verified by The Recording Academy. As he was not the artist but the recording engineer there was little or no press about it. He is an industry leader, at the top level of his field and his name is on millions of platinum selling records around the world. He is endorsed by major music software companies such as Waves and Melodyne (see interviews). He was also shown on television recently working in the studio with the top 12 contestants on this years American Idol. I don't understand how he is not worthy of an article.[[User:BrittyGirl|BrittyGirl]] ([[User talk:BrittyGirl|talk]]) 05:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
10302 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10301 +++$+++ 10301 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.304226180E09 +++$+++ If you'd like the article to be restored, see [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] for how to get an article deletion reviewed, and potentially reversed. --  +++$+++ :If you'd like the article to be restored, see [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] for how to get an article deletion reviewed, and potentially reversed. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 22:03, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

10303 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-29 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.304125560E09 +++$+++ Hi. I have a download request. Would it be possible for you to access the PDF\/adobe you find at the top of google searching '''OCHA Afghanistan Settlements Index''' and download it onto wikipedia but in a fashion that puts the districts \/and or provinces in alpha order so we effectively we have a list of villages under each district\/province? Is just the vast majority of articles don't know what district it is and the old geonames out of date at times asi found out that some in Sar -i- Pol province used to be in Jowzjan province. If so I can use that as a guide to create them.\u2666  +++$+++ Hi. I have a download request. Would it be possible for you to access the PDF/adobe you find at the top of google searching '''OCHA Afghanistan Settlements Index''' and download it onto wikipedia but in a fashion that puts the districts /and or provinces in alpha order so we effectively we have a list of villages under each district/province? Is just the vast majority of articles don't know what district it is and the old geonames out of date at times asi found out that some in Sar -i- Pol province used to be in Jowzjan province. If so I can use that as a guide to create them.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 18:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
10304 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10303 +++$+++ 10303 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.304360700E09 +++$+++ I'm on it. --  +++$+++ :I'm on it. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 11:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
10305 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10303 +++$+++ 10304 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.304366760E09 +++$+++ These pages try as far as possible to disambiguate village names down to the province\/district level, and omit any entries for villages that have the same name in a single district and therefore cannot be disambiguated. Note that the transliterations in the names do not line up 100% with those used by Wikipedia as standard: if you can identify the mappings that are incorrect, I can go through the list automatically correcting them to Wikipedia standard usage. The same goes for disambiguation formats: if there is a better format, please let me know, and I will regenerate the pages appropriately. --  +++$+++ ::These pages try as far as possible to disambiguate village names down to the province/district level, and omit any entries for villages that have the same name in a single district and therefore cannot be disambiguated. Note that the transliterations in the names do not line up 100% with those used by Wikipedia as standard: if you can identify the mappings that are incorrect, I can go through the list automatically correcting them to Wikipedia standard usage. The same goes for disambiguation formats: if there is a better format, please let me know, and I will regenerate the pages appropriately. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 13:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
10306 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10303 +++$+++ 10304 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.304369820E09 +++$+++ Updated to fix some obvious transliteration errors: note that things still need further checking. --  +++$+++ ::Updated to fix some obvious transliteration errors: note that things still need further checking. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 13:57, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

534593 +++$+++ Kyoko +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-08 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.176083760E09 +++$+++ If you're curious, I don't think I'm strongly inclusionist or deletionist. I tend to like having articles about TV episodes, etc., but I don't think that Wikipedia needs articles on every garage band out there. -- +++$+++ If you're curious, I don't think I'm strongly inclusionist or deletionist. I tend to like having articles about TV episodes, etc., but I don't think that Wikipedia needs articles on every garage band out there. --[[User:Kyoko|<font face="arial" color="#8652b9">''Kyok''</font>]][[User talk:Kyoko|<font face="arial" color="#BA55D3">''o''</font>]] 18:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
534594 +++$+++ Kyoko +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534593 +++$+++ 534593 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.176166020E09 +++$+++ I want to bring up something that we've both been involved with before, [[Wikipedia:Esperanza]]. It saddens me and even bothers me that so much effort is being spent trying to find the right wording for the essay there. To use a metaphor, if Esperanza prior to the MfDs was a sinking ship, then fiddling with the essay now is like trying to repair the ship after it has already sunk. Sorry for ranting, but I'm just frustrated over how divisive Esperanza still is, even months after it became inactive. -- +++$+++ :I want to bring up something that we've both been involved with before, [[Wikipedia:Esperanza]]. It saddens me and even bothers me that so much effort is being spent trying to find the right wording for the essay there. To use a metaphor, if Esperanza prior to the MfDs was a sinking ship, then fiddling with the essay now is like trying to repair the ship after it has already sunk. Sorry for ranting, but I'm just frustrated over how divisive Esperanza still is, even months after it became inactive. --[[User:Kyoko|<font face="arial" color="#8652b9">''Kyok''</font>]][[User talk:Kyoko|<font face="arial" color="#BA55D3">''o''</font>]] 17:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

272450 +++$+++ Shimgray +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-14 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.142392320E09 +++$+++ Sadly no. Information on Ewart is pretty patchy, since he came from an obscure background, though if you go back to 1700s sources you might find something. But since you're in Melbourne, that's kind of ruled out...  +++$+++ Sadly no. Information on Ewart is pretty patchy, since he came from an obscure background, though if you go back to 1700s sources you might find something. But since you're in Melbourne, that's kind of ruled out... [[User:Shimgray|Shimgray]] | [[User talk:Shimgray|talk]] | 19:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
272451 +++$+++ FreplySpang +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272450 +++$+++ 272450 +++$+++ 2006-03-15 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.142482920E09 +++$+++ (eavesdropping) Oh, argh!  +++$+++ : (eavesdropping) Oh, argh! [[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] [[User talk:FreplySpang|(talk)]] 20:22, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

10307 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10307 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-03 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.304445060E09 +++$+++ Thanks, as I thought... I think the transliterations should be UN standard. Can you standardise them? I am aware some of them may be horrifically bad transliterations or way off more general names.. They all need standardising and dabbing, then the district lists can be copied into nav templates and the articles on the districts and I'll start them.. The dabbing convention is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Doorman&action=historysubmit&diff=427215417&oldid=427213951 here]. Don't worry though if that's how you've done it!\u2666  +++$+++ Thanks, as I thought... I think the transliterations should be UN standard. Can you standardise them? I am aware some of them may be horrifically bad transliterations or way off more general names.. They all need standardising and dabbing, then the district lists can be copied into nav templates and the articles on the districts and I'll start them.. The dabbing convention is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Doorman&action=historysubmit&diff=427215417&oldid=427213951 here]. Don't worry though if that's how you've done it!♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 10:51, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
10308 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10307 +++$+++ 10307 +++$+++ 2011-05-03 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.304449020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the information about the dab convention -- I've seen it done both ways, and wasn't sure which was standard. Presumably [[Dasht, Kuran Wa Munjan District, Badakhshan]] would be the format for an article that needs disambiguation down to the district level? --  +++$+++ :Thanks for the information about the dab convention -- I've seen it done both ways, and wasn't sure which was standard. Presumably [[Dasht, Kuran Wa Munjan District, Badakhshan]] would be the format for an article that needs disambiguation down to the district level? -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 11:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

10309 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10309 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-03 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.304450160E09 +++$+++ [[Dasht, Kuran Wa Munjan]], usually.\u2666  +++$+++ [[Dasht, Kuran Wa Munjan]], usually.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 12:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
10310 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10309 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-03 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.304467620E09 +++$+++ OK -- I'll tweak my code to try it that way, too, but first, I'll need to check if there are any two villages with the same name ''and'' district name in different provinces: if so, they will have to have the full three-level disambiguation. --  +++$+++ ::OK -- I'll tweak my code to try it that way, too, but first, I'll need to check if there are any two villages with the same name ''and'' district name in different provinces: if so, they will have to have the full three-level disambiguation. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 17:07, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
10311 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10309 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-03 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.304470260E09 +++$+++ I think it's now as finished as it can get without proper manual work to check up geographic details. Would you like to take one more quick look to double-check? --  +++$+++ :::I think it's now as finished as it can get without proper manual work to check up geographic details. Would you like to take one more quick look to double-check? -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 17:51, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

534599 +++$+++ Ddcc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-22 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.177231440E09 +++$+++ OK. I just didn't know what you were going to do with the content, so I just restored it. <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ OK. I just didn't know what you were going to do with the content, so I just restored it. <font color="blue">[[User:Ddcc|'''D''']]</font><font color="green">[[User talk:Ddcc|''dc'']]</font><font color="black">[[Special:Emailuser/Ddcc|'''c''']]</font> 01:44, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
534600 +++$+++ Ddcc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534599 +++$+++ 534599 +++$+++ 2007-04-22 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.177231500E09 +++$+++ BTW, there's a lot of double redirects right now. Some of the articles have a main leading to the redirect, which redirects back to the list. How does the \"What links here\" show double redirects? <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :BTW, there's a lot of double redirects right now. Some of the articles have a main leading to the redirect, which redirects back to the list. How does the "What links here" show double redirects? <font color="blue">[[User:Ddcc|'''D''']]</font><font color="green">[[User talk:Ddcc|''dc'']]</font><font color="black">[[Special:Emailuser/Ddcc|'''c''']]</font> 01:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
534601 +++$+++ Ddcc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534599 +++$+++ 534600 +++$+++ 2007-04-23 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.177318860E09 +++$+++ Also, on the article Takhsis, your edits have been reverted by Jason Palpatine because apparently the redirect contains no significant information. See [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Takhisis&curid=1134525&diff=125027980&oldid=124709168]]. <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ ::Also, on the article Takhsis, your edits have been reverted by Jason Palpatine because apparently the redirect contains no significant information. See [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Takhisis&curid=1134525&diff=125027980&oldid=124709168]]. <font color="blue">[[User:Ddcc|'''D''']]</font><font color="green">[[User talk:Ddcc|''dc'']]</font><font color="black">[[Special:Emailuser/Ddcc|'''c''']]</font> 02:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
534602 +++$+++ Ddcc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534599 +++$+++ 534601 +++$+++ 2007-04-23 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.177319040E09 +++$+++ In addition, make sure you're using the images, otherwise they'll be deleted since they're fair use, but aren't being used. <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :::In addition, make sure you're using the images, otherwise they'll be deleted since they're fair use, but aren't being used. <font color="blue">[[User:Ddcc|'''D''']]</font><font color="green">[[User talk:Ddcc|''dc'']]</font><font color="black">[[Special:Emailuser/Ddcc|'''c''']]</font> 02:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

10314 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-13 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.305336360E09 +++$+++ Any plan of action yet?\u2666  +++$+++ Any plan of action yet?♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 18:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
10315 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10314 +++$+++ 10314 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.305403020E09 +++$+++ I'm tied up with off-wiki issues at the moment. I'll try to make some progress on this tomorrow. --  +++$+++ :I'm tied up with off-wiki issues at the moment. I'll try to make some progress on this tomorrow. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 12:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

272459 +++$+++ CBDunkerson +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-03 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.144122600E09 +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|left]] Thank you for your support vote on my [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/CBDunkerson|RFA]]. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. -- +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|left]] Thank you for your support vote on my [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/CBDunkerson|RFA]]. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. --[[User:CBDunkerson|CBDunkerson]] 20:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
272460 +++$+++ Funky Monkey +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272459 +++$+++ 272459 +++$+++ 2006-04-03 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.144125720E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm getting slightly annoyed by his constant edit warring now.  Another user has mentioned mediation and I think if it continues after another week of votes, if the result is keep WJ, then it will have to go to mediation.  As for the red links it may be users repeatedly logging in anonymously to vote.  As there are no other contributions from these editors, I think that the opinions should not be counted, but I am not sure of Wiki policy on this. Do you?  +++$+++ :Yeah, I'm getting slightly annoyed by his constant edit warring now.  Another user has mentioned mediation and I think if it continues after another week of votes, if the result is keep WJ, then it will have to go to mediation.  As for the red links it may be users repeatedly logging in anonymously to vote.  As there are no other contributions from these editors, I think that the opinions should not be counted, but I am not sure of Wiki policy on this. Do you? [[User:Funky Monkey|Funky Monkey]] 21:42, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

272461 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-24 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.145908260E09 +++$+++ I've called for some Admins to take a look, but I'm guessing that an RfC is probably the next step. Would that be a separate topic? I'm pretty much feeling my way around through here. Thanks! -- +++$+++ I've called for some Admins to take a look, but I'm guessing that an RfC is probably the next step. Would that be a separate topic? I'm pretty much feeling my way around through here. Thanks! --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] 12:51, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
272462 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272461 +++$+++ 272461 +++$+++ 2006-04-25 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.145995080E09 +++$+++ Mailing list? Where can I find more about the mailing list? (Oh, and thanks, so much for the vote of confidence!) -- +++$+++ :Mailing list? Where can I find more about the mailing list? (Oh, and thanks, so much for the vote of confidence!) --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] 12:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

534606 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534606 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-05 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.178413980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the review on [[Historic district]]. Much appreciated as that one was in queue for quite some time.  +++$+++ Thanks for the review on [[Historic district]]. Much appreciated as that one was in queue for quite some time. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] 18:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
534607 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534606 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.178414700E09 +++$+++ Nice, I will have to thank him, the both of you have been most helpful.  +++$+++ ::Nice, I will have to thank him, the both of you have been most helpful. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] 18:25, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
534608 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534606 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.178415600E09 +++$+++ I have [[Space Interferometry Mission]] up. I watch the architecture section for Chicago project stuff, it seems like a lot of their nominations have been slipping through even though they aren't up to snuff, usually TonytheTiger noms them, I like the guy, he's a good editor, but their GA noms are weak, a lot. [[Chicago Theatre]] was renommed without the original concerns being addressed. And recently passed [[Wigwam (Chicago)]], didn't look all that great concerning the criteria. There is the nom for [[Blackstone Library]] too, from the Chicago project, while it looks a  little better, it has a trivia section, I mean, come on, that's just really bad structure. My problem is that a lot of these nominations don't seem broad enough for articles about major local landmarks in the nation's third largest city. Either way, something to watch for I think, another way to help clear the backlog I guess. I am not trying to single out this user or anything, just want GA to mean GA is all. It shouldn't be easy.  +++$+++ :::I have [[Space Interferometry Mission]] up. I watch the architecture section for Chicago project stuff, it seems like a lot of their nominations have been slipping through even though they aren't up to snuff, usually TonytheTiger noms them, I like the guy, he's a good editor, but their GA noms are weak, a lot. [[Chicago Theatre]] was renommed without the original concerns being addressed. And recently passed [[Wigwam (Chicago)]], didn't look all that great concerning the criteria. There is the nom for [[Blackstone Library]] too, from the Chicago project, while it looks a  little better, it has a trivia section, I mean, come on, that's just really bad structure. My problem is that a lot of these nominations don't seem broad enough for articles about major local landmarks in the nation's third largest city. Either way, something to watch for I think, another way to help clear the backlog I guess. I am not trying to single out this user or anything, just want GA to mean GA is all. It shouldn't be easy. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] 18:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
534609 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534606 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.178416080E09 +++$+++ You might want to take a look at and comment on the review for [[WP:GA\/R#Marquette_Building_.28Chicago.29|Marquette Building]], another Chicago article. I can't believe this even passed. I don't know who is reviewing these articles but at the very least it seems suspicious.  +++$+++ ::::You might want to take a look at and comment on the review for [[WP:GA/R#Marquette_Building_.28Chicago.29|Marquette Building]], another Chicago article. I can't believe this even passed. I don't know who is reviewing these articles but at the very least it seems suspicious. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] 18:48, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
534610 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534606 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.178416320E09 +++$+++ Yeah, maybe, just not a very diverse crowd is all, not enough editors. I'll quit bugging you now.  +++$+++ :::Yeah, maybe, just not a very diverse crowd is all, not enough editors. I'll quit bugging you now. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] 18:52, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
534611 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534606 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.178416440E09 +++$+++ You mean, like, \"wow, a message? For me? Well I never . . . \"  +++$+++ ::You mean, like, "wow, a message? For me? Well I never . . . " [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] 18:54, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
534612 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534606 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.178418120E09 +++$+++ Yep me too. Hope you enjoyed ''that'' yellowish orange bar.  +++$+++ :::Yep me too. Hope you enjoyed ''that'' yellowish orange bar. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] 19:22, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

89101 +++$+++ Kebeta +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89101 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-13 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.300066140E09 +++$+++ Good job on expanding and fixing the article. Now, if you could add some citations on the end of the sections, we could aim for 'B class'...:-) -- +++$+++ Good job on expanding and fixing the article. Now, if you could add some citations on the end of the sections, we could aim for 'B class'...:-) --[[User:Kebeta|Kebeta]] ([[User talk:Kebeta|talk]]) 18:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
89102 +++$+++ Kebeta +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89101 +++$+++ 89101 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.300067460E09 +++$+++ I know. Still, the article looks much better now. -- +++$+++ :I know. Still, the article looks much better now. --[[User:Kebeta|Kebeta]] ([[User talk:Kebeta|talk]]) 18:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

10321 +++$+++ CaroleHenson +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-05 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.304586660E09 +++$+++ Hi Anome, I'm still learning the ropes here so I was hoping you could help me understand why a painting should provide geographic coordinate info - or maybe just that it should be included in some sort of Netherlands category.  You added {{coord missing|Netherlands}} to [[Still Life with Straw Hat]] and I'm just trying to figure out: what should be done for this painting and well as other articles I'm writing about paintings.  Thanks so much!!!-- +++$+++ Hi Anome, I'm still learning the ropes here so I was hoping you could help me understand why a painting should provide geographic coordinate info - or maybe just that it should be included in some sort of Netherlands category.  You added {{coord missing|Netherlands}} to [[Still Life with Straw Hat]] and I'm just trying to figure out: what should be done for this painting and well as other articles I'm writing about paintings.  Thanks so much!!!--[[User:CaroleHenson|CaroleHenson]] ([[User talk:CaroleHenson|talk]]) 02:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
10322 +++$+++ Tagishsimon +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10321 +++$+++ 10321 +++$+++ 2011-05-05 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.304604060E09 +++$+++ {{tl|coord missing}} is placed on articles based on their categorisation; this painting was categorised as [[:Category:National museums of the Netherlands]] which effectively makes the claim that it is a bricks & mortar construction capable of having coordinates ascribed to it. I've removed the poor category and the {{tl|coord missing}}. -- +++$+++ :{{tl|coord missing}} is placed on articles based on their categorisation; this painting was categorised as [[:Category:National museums of the Netherlands]] which effectively makes the claim that it is a bricks & mortar construction capable of having coordinates ascribed to it. I've removed the poor category and the {{tl|coord missing}}. --[[User:Tagishsimon|Tagishsimon]] [[User_talk:Tagishsimon|(talk)]] 07:01, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
10323 +++$+++ CaroleHenson +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10321 +++$+++ 10322 +++$+++ 2011-05-05 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.304605680E09 +++$+++ Ah, thanks!  That makes sense.  It was one of the first articles I started on my one and I wasn't too clued into Categories then (it's still a work in progress, but definitely better).  Thanks for fixing it!-- +++$+++ ::Ah, thanks!  That makes sense.  It was one of the first articles I started on my one and I wasn't too clued into Categories then (it's still a work in progress, but definitely better).  Thanks for fixing it!--[[User:CaroleHenson|CaroleHenson]] ([[User talk:CaroleHenson|talk]]) 07:28, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

10326 +++$+++ TreasuryTag +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-08 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.304891400E09 +++$+++ Hi, The Anome, sorry to bother you about something that happened almost a year ago, but {{userlinks|Exxolon}} is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=428080851&oldid=428074365 attempting to use] the fact that I've \"gotten myself blocked ELEVEN TIMES\" in a rather tangential context; however, this figure of 11 includes your mistaken block of me in July 2010, as well as one other completely mistaken block, plus nine others which all resulted in unblock. Anyway, I wonder if you wouldn't mind commenting either on his talkpage or in the thread concerned to confirm the total irrelvance of your accidental 'incident' to my track record? Thanks. <font color=\"#A20846\">\u255f\u2500 +++$+++ Hi, The Anome, sorry to bother you about something that happened almost a year ago, but {{userlinks|Exxolon}} is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=428080851&oldid=428074365 attempting to use] the fact that I've "gotten myself blocked ELEVEN TIMES" in a rather tangential context; however, this figure of 11 includes your mistaken block of me in July 2010, as well as one other completely mistaken block, plus nine others which all resulted in unblock. Anyway, I wonder if you wouldn't mind commenting either on his talkpage or in the thread concerned to confirm the total irrelvance of your accidental 'incident' to my track record? Thanks. <font color="#A20846">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">hemicycle</span>]]─╢</font> 14:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
10327 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10326 +++$+++ 10326 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.304961180E09 +++$+++ {{done}} --  +++$+++ :{{done}} -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 10:13, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
10328 +++$+++ TreasuryTag +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10326 +++$+++ 10327 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.304962260E09 +++$+++ Great, thanks. <font color=\"#FFB911\">\u255f\u2500 +++$+++ ::Great, thanks. <font color="#FFB911">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">duumvirate</span>]]─╢</font> 10:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

10330 +++$+++ Word Sliver +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-15 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.305461340E09 +++$+++ Can you find a free image of an open-faced bondage hood and\/or a ponytail hood, because I can't find one. I wasn't using the article as a \"coat rack\" for just any old pictures. My two picture selections, which you deleted, specifically illustrate the variety of apparel being described in the article. I also cut down on the \"original research\" and reorganized the text some, so it should be OK now.  +++$+++ Can you find a free image of an open-faced bondage hood and/or a ponytail hood, because I can't find one. I wasn't using the article as a "coat rack" for just any old pictures. My two picture selections, which you deleted, specifically illustrate the variety of apparel being described in the article. I also cut down on the "original research" and reorganized the text some, so it should be OK now. [[User:Word Sliver|Word Sliver]] ([[User talk:Word Sliver|talk]]) 05:09, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
10331 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10330 +++$+++ 10330 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.305496020E09 +++$+++ Wikimedia Commons has a bunch of suitably free images of other sorts of bondage hoods -- see http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Bondage_hoods and its subcategories -- but I don't think these are what you want. A quick use of other tools to find suitable open-licensed images comes up with nothing. Have you considered making your own image, and uploading it yourself? Cameras are cheap, and all you need is a hood, a broad-minded friend (or a camera with a time-delay and willingness to appear yourself in Wikipedia), and the willingness to go through the necessary processes, including paying attention to any legal issues that may exist. --  +++$+++ :Wikimedia Commons has a bunch of suitably free images of other sorts of bondage hoods -- see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Bondage_hoods and its subcategories -- but I don't think these are what you want. A quick use of other tools to find suitable open-licensed images comes up with nothing. Have you considered making your own image, and uploading it yourself? Cameras are cheap, and all you need is a hood, a broad-minded friend (or a camera with a time-delay and willingness to appear yourself in Wikipedia), and the willingness to go through the necessary processes, including paying attention to any legal issues that may exist. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 14:47, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

272475 +++$+++ Kylet +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272475 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-16 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.145242980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Kylet|kylet]] 20:03, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
272476 +++$+++ Rodw +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272475 +++$+++ 272475 +++$+++ 2006-06-04 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.149463620E09 +++$+++ I saw your comment on Kylet's talk page about not many nurses on WP you can always add your self to the category [[:Category:Nurse Wikipedians]] &mdash;  +++$+++ : I saw your comment on Kylet's talk page about not many nurses on WP you can always add your self to the category [[:Category:Nurse Wikipedians]] &mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 16:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

10332 +++$+++ Nedim Ardoğa +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-17 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.305663180E09 +++$+++ Hi, on 18 September 2009, The Anemobot has tagged the article [[Kurto\u011flu H\u0131z\u0131r Reis]] ''coord missing''. Well this article is about a person. How can a person have a geographical coordinate ? Cheers.  +++$+++ Hi, on 18 September 2009, The Anemobot has tagged the article [[Kurtoğlu Hızır Reis]] ''coord missing''. Well this article is about a person. How can a person have a geographical coordinate ? Cheers. [[User:Nedim Ardoğa|Nedim Ardoğa]] ([[User talk:Nedim Ardoğa|talk]]) 13:13, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
10333 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10332 +++$+++ 10332 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.305706440E09 +++$+++ It's a mistake. I've added some categories that would have made the bot recognise it as a person article, but the bot should in any case, having logged itself as having changed the article already, not try to revisit the article in future. --  +++$+++ :It's a mistake. I've added some categories that would have made the bot recognise it as a person article, but the bot should in any case, having logged itself as having changed the article already, not try to revisit the article in future. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 01:14, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
10334 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10332 +++$+++ 10333 +++$+++ 2011-06-08 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.307565900E09 +++$+++ Similar today: [[Dresdner Kreuzchor]], it's a choir travelling in the world. If it has to have coords - which I don't think - take those of [[Kreuzkirche]]. -- +++$+++ ::Similar today: [[Dresdner Kreuzchor]], it's a choir travelling in the world. If it has to have coords - which I don't think - take those of [[Kreuzkirche]]. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 13:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
10335 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10332 +++$+++ 10334 +++$+++ 2011-06-08 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.307566140E09 +++$+++ Fixed by hand. The bot shouldn't try to code it again. --  +++$+++ :::Fixed by hand. The bot shouldn't try to code it again. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 13:49, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

272477 +++$+++ Cuddy Wifter +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-17 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.145266860E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I wonder if your definition of expatriate as presently \"residing in a foreign country\" is a little too narrow. In the [[:Category:British expatriates]] under the sub-category [[:Category:British people in China]] it states '''''A list of notable British people who have lived in or visited China'''''. There are a number of people, who are long deceased, included in this category. I believe the category should include any person who for some period of their life resided outside of their native country. Without a category definition of \"presently residing in a foreign country\", for expatriate categories, I see nothing wrong with including former expatriates. Regards  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I wonder if your definition of expatriate as presently "residing in a foreign country" is a little too narrow. In the [[:Category:British expatriates]] under the sub-category [[:Category:British people in China]] it states '''''A list of notable British people who have lived in or visited China'''''. There are a number of people, who are long deceased, included in this category. I believe the category should include any person who for some period of their life resided outside of their native country. Without a category definition of "presently residing in a foreign country", for expatriate categories, I see nothing wrong with including former expatriates. Regards [[User:Cuddy Wifter|Cuddy Wifter]] 02:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
272478 +++$+++ Cuddy Wifter +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272477 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-17 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.145281980E09 +++$+++ I was under the impression that you could offer an alternative opinion on a discussion page without getting your head bitten off. I will refrain from so doing, should I cross your path, in the future. Regards  +++$+++ ::I was under the impression that you could offer an alternative opinion on a discussion page without getting your head bitten off. I will refrain from so doing, should I cross your path, in the future. Regards [[User:Cuddy Wifter|Cuddy Wifter]] 06:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

272479 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272479 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks for your response advising I had not been blocked - but - I just tried to re-edit the mistake I discussed earlier and got the message that either my name or my I.P. had been blocked and when I checked the blocked list, my I.P. was there for the 16th April.White Squirrel 14:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ Thanks for your response advising I had not been blocked - but - I just tried to re-edit the mistake I discussed earlier and got the message that either my name or my I.P. had been blocked and when I checked the blocked list, my I.P. was there for the 16th April.White Squirrel 14:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
272480 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272479 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah. But this is all new to me. How do I put an UNBLOCK Tag on my Talk Page please? And does that then automatically UNBLOCK me?  Thanks again.White Squirrel 15:12, 17 April 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :: Thanks Sarah. But this is all new to me. How do I put an UNBLOCK Tag on my Talk Page please? And does that then automatically UNBLOCK me?  Thanks again.White Squirrel 15:12, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
272481 +++$+++ Werdna648 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272479 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-18 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.145349300E09 +++$+++ place {{[[Template:unblock|unblock]]}} at the top of your user-page. This requests administrator take a look into your case.  +++$+++ :::place {{[[Template:unblock|unblock]]}} at the top of your user-page. This requests administrator take a look into your case. [[User:Werdna648|Werdna648]]<sup>[[User_talk:Werdna648|T]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Werdna648|C]]</sub>\<sup>[[Special:Emailuser/Werdna648|@]]</sup> 01:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

10336 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10336 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-19 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.305860280E09 +++$+++ I've just found an article, [[Echills Wood Railway]], in [[:Category:British miniature railways]] and [[:Category:7\xbc inch gauge railways]], with no coordinates and no {{Tl|Coord missing}} template. More work for your bot? <span class=\"vcard\"><span class=\"fn\"> +++$+++ I've just found an article, [[Echills Wood Railway]], in [[:Category:British miniature railways]] and [[:Category:7¼ inch gauge railways]], with no coordinates and no {{Tl|Coord missing}} template. More work for your bot? <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (User:<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Andy's talk]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 19:58, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
10337 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10336 +++$+++ 10336 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.306011420E09 +++$+++ I've added \"miniature railways\" to my list of types of structures: they will be detected in future bot runs. --  +++$+++ :I've added "miniature railways" to my list of types of structures: they will be detected in future bot runs. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 13:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

534628 +++$+++ Bibliomaniac15 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-30 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.180511880E09 +++$+++ Please tell me whether you would like to go or not. If you accept, I will create the page. Thank you, and please reply as soon as you can. ''''' +++$+++ Please tell me whether you would like to go or not. If you accept, I will create the page. Thank you, and please reply as soon as you can. '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="black">bibliomaniac</font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="red">1</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bibliomaniac15|<font color="blue">5</font>]]''''' 00:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
534629 +++$+++ Bibliomaniac15 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534628 +++$+++ 534628 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.180512900E09 +++$+++ Sure. Take your time. Happy \"late\" Memorial Day. ''''' +++$+++ :Sure. Take your time. Happy "late" Memorial Day. '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="black">bibliomaniac</font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="red">1</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bibliomaniac15|<font color="blue">5</font>]]''''' 01:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
534630 +++$+++ Bibliomaniac15 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534628 +++$+++ 534629 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.180517820E09 +++$+++ I've created the page. Feel free to read my intro and tell me what should be corrected. ''''' +++$+++ ::I've created the page. Feel free to read my intro and tell me what should be corrected. '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="black">bibliomaniac</font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="red">1</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bibliomaniac15|<font color="blue">5</font>]]''''' 02:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
534631 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534628 +++$+++ 534630 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.180537140E09 +++$+++ You've got my support. Good luck mate. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::You've got my support. Good luck mate. Cheers, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 07:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
534632 +++$+++ Bibliomaniac15 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534628 +++$+++ 534631 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.180602540E09 +++$+++ I added an optional question. Because it's rather trivial, don't answer it if you don't want. ''''' +++$+++ ::::I added an optional question. Because it's rather trivial, don't answer it if you don't want. '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="black">bibliomaniac</font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="red">1</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bibliomaniac15|<font color="blue">5</font>]]''''' 02:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

10341 +++$+++ Redrose64 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-31 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.306873980E09 +++$+++ Hi, re {{diff|Tattenham Corner Line|prev|431809707|this}} and similar edits: railway lines tend to be long and thin, and some (such as this one) are far from straight. How would I choose suitable coordinates - one end (which one), the mid-point, or the centre of gravity of the polygon enclosed by the railway line and a [[Chord (geometry)|chord]] connecting origin with terminus? -- +++$+++ Hi, re {{diff|Tattenham Corner Line|prev|431809707|this}} and similar edits: railway lines tend to be long and thin, and some (such as this one) are far from straight. How would I choose suitable coordinates - one end (which one), the mid-point, or the centre of gravity of the polygon enclosed by the railway line and a [[Chord (geometry)|chord]] connecting origin with terminus? --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#d30000; background:#ffeeee">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 13:33, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
10342 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10341 +++$+++ 10341 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.306874100E09 +++$+++ I'd suggest a representative point somewhere in the middle that actually lies on the line itself. --  +++$+++ :I'd suggest a representative point somewhere in the middle that actually lies on the line itself. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 13:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
10343 +++$+++ Pencefn +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10341 +++$+++ 10342 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.306889580E09 +++$+++ A middle point is not always appropriate, and almost never representative. For example, the geodata for {{Stnlnk|Dovey Junction}} as added for the [[Cambrian Line]], were several major towns along the route would be more appropriate. Quite a few railway line articles already include a table of grid references of major calling points, and most, if not all, stations linked from the article include geodata. -- +++$+++ ::A middle point is not always appropriate, and almost never representative. For example, the geodata for {{Stnlnk|Dovey Junction}} as added for the [[Cambrian Line]], were several major towns along the route would be more appropriate. Quite a few railway line articles already include a table of grid references of major calling points, and most, if not all, stations linked from the article include geodata. --[[User:Pencefn|Stewart]]<small><font color="maroon"><sup> '''([[User talk:Pencefn#top|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Pencefn|edits]])'''</sup></font></small> 17:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

10344 +++$+++ Thryduulf +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10344 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-02 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.307041740E09 +++$+++ There is currently a discussion ongoing about this issue at [[WT:UKRAIL#Railway line coordinates]]. Please could you hold off adding any more templates to UK railway line articles until this has been resolved. Thanks,  +++$+++ There is currently a discussion ongoing about this issue at [[WT:UKRAIL#Railway line coordinates]]. Please could you hold off adding any more templates to UK railway line articles until this has been resolved. Thanks, [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 12:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
10345 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10344 +++$+++ 10344 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.307041980E09 +++$+++ If you get a resolution for this issue, I'll be happy to re-enable them: just let me know. --  +++$+++ :If you get a resolution for this issue, I'll be happy to re-enable them: just let me know. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 12:13, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
10346 +++$+++ Thryduulf +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10344 +++$+++ 10345 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.307048880E09 +++$+++ If your script is case sensitive, then could you treat \"line\" the same as \"Line\" please (although most are capitalised not all are, e.g. [[Piccadilly line]]). Thank you for the quick response.  +++$+++ ::If your script is case sensitive, then could you treat "line" the same as "Line" please (although most are capitalised not all are, e.g. [[Piccadilly line]]). Thank you for the quick response. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 14:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
10347 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10344 +++$+++ 10346 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.307049600E09 +++$+++ Done. --  +++$+++ :::Done. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 14:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

534633 +++$+++ Bibliomaniac15 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.180602960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. By the way, try not to bold your answers, they're an eyesore. ''''' +++$+++ Thanks. By the way, try not to bold your answers, they're an eyesore. '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="black">bibliomaniac</font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="red">1</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bibliomaniac15|<font color="blue">5</font>]]''''' 02:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
534634 +++$+++ Wikidan829 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534633 +++$+++ 534633 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.180606620E09 +++$+++ Good luck on your RfA!! You'll find that a few people can't make their own opinions and merely repeat what other people say, both good and bad(see how many times \"mature\" and variations thereof occur). Don't let it discourage you. You'll do fine.  +++$+++ :Good luck on your RfA!! You'll find that a few people can't make their own opinions and merely repeat what other people say, both good and bad(see how many times "mature" and variations thereof occur). Don't let it discourage you. You'll do fine. [[User:Wikidan829|Wikidan829]] 03:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
534635 +++$+++ Bibliomaniac15 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534633 +++$+++ 534634 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.180767960E09 +++$+++ Like most Wikipedia policy, RFA promotion tends to be vague standards. Most users reject the notion of percentage and instead rely on consensus to promote users. How crats measure this arbitrary consensus I don't know. It somehow relates to the Meta essay about polls being evil. Percentage is just around as a guideline, so far as I understand it. I think your RFA will turn to a borderline pass, since most rely on the 75% stated. '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color=\"black\">bibliomaniac<\/font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color=\"red\">1<\/font>]][[Special:Contributions\/Bibliomaniac15|<font color=\"blue\">5<\/font>]]''''' <small> +++$+++ ::Like most Wikipedia policy, RFA promotion tends to be vague standards. Most users reject the notion of percentage and instead rely on consensus to promote users. How crats measure this arbitrary consensus I don't know. It somehow relates to the Meta essay about polls being evil. Percentage is just around as a guideline, so far as I understand it. I think your RFA will turn to a borderline pass, since most rely on the 75% stated. '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="black">bibliomaniac</font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="red">1</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bibliomaniac15|<font color="blue">5</font>]]''''' <small>[[User:Bibliomaniac15/How many Wikipedians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?|An age old question...]]</small> 00:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
534636 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534633 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.180813500E09 +++$+++ How's it going? How are you holding up? I knew it was a harsh process, but, yeah, It's not pleasant having every edit you've made (ever) and then being judged against it. If I even make the strain of ''5'' more days then I'll start thinking about what next. Until then, if you want someone to talk to in the same basket, give me a bell. Cheers, a very tired  +++$+++ :::: How's it going? How are you holding up? I knew it was a harsh process, but, yeah, It's not pleasant having every edit you've made (ever) and then being judged against it. If I even make the strain of ''5'' more days then I'll start thinking about what next. Until then, if you want someone to talk to in the same basket, give me a bell. Cheers, a very tired [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 12:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
534637 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534633 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.180846260E09 +++$+++ It does help. Thanks mate, and some good luck yourself. Thiough I think I'm loosing it a bit, I just called you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:DoomsDay349&diff=135406739&oldid=135310748 meat].  Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::: It does help. Thanks mate, and some good luck yourself. Thiough I think I'm loosing it a bit, I just called you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoomsDay349&diff=135406739&oldid=135310748 meat].  Cheers, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 21:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

567732 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567732 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-19 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.192859640E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :)  +++$+++ Thanks! :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 22:54, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
567733 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567732 +++$+++ 567732 +++$+++ 2007-10-19 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.192860720E09 +++$+++ Ha ha! Thanks! :)  +++$+++ :Ha ha! Thanks! :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 23:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

10349 +++$+++ Kontrol3140 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10349 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-09 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.307677500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Kontrol3140|Kontrol3140]] ([[User talk:Kontrol3140|talk]]) 20:45, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
10350 +++$+++ Tagishsimon +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10349 +++$+++ 10349 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.307687160E09 +++$+++ In hand at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/David Lawson (author)]] -- +++$+++ :In hand at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lawson (author)]] --[[User:Tagishsimon|Tagishsimon]] [[User_talk:Tagishsimon|(talk)]] 23:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

113822 +++$+++ Ultraexactzz +++$+++ Hammersfan +++$+++ 113822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-26 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.206599220E09 +++$+++ Hi. I notice that you're correcting links to the crew members of various Apollo-era and earlier spaceflights. However, in the case of [[Apollo 8]], you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Apollo_8&diff=prev&oldid=201181251 replaced] several paragraphs of prose (and several references) with a bulleted list. While several other spaceflight articles have such lists, this article was expanded during a Featured Article Review, so - if possible - I'd like to keep the prose and references in place. Can we discuss this? Thanks in advance,  +++$+++ Hi. I notice that you're correcting links to the crew members of various Apollo-era and earlier spaceflights. However, in the case of [[Apollo 8]], you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apollo_8&diff=prev&oldid=201181251 replaced] several paragraphs of prose (and several references) with a bulleted list. While several other spaceflight articles have such lists, this article was expanded during a Featured Article Review, so - if possible - I'd like to keep the prose and references in place. Can we discuss this? Thanks in advance, [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 23:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
113823 +++$+++ Ultraexactzz +++$+++ Hammersfan +++$+++ 113822 +++$+++ 113822 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.206600600E09 +++$+++ I have to disagree, as I can't think of a way in which a list is better than a prose section that conveys the same information. The prose doesn't note previous spaceflights explicitly, so that can be added - but I think it might be better to convert the other spaceflight articles to prose in a similar fashion (or, at least, the ones in the Apollo program). Would that be better?  +++$+++ :I have to disagree, as I can't think of a way in which a list is better than a prose section that conveys the same information. The prose doesn't note previous spaceflights explicitly, so that can be added - but I think it might be better to convert the other spaceflight articles to prose in a similar fashion (or, at least, the ones in the Apollo program). Would that be better? [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 23:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
113824 +++$+++ Ultraexactzz +++$+++ Hammersfan +++$+++ 113822 +++$+++ 113823 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.206611760E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, I'm sold. However, if you get a chance, could you restore the reference (#2) that seems to be broken? I can't seem to figure out which one it is, but it's likely one of the ones removed from that section. Thanks again,  +++$+++ ::Fair enough, I'm sold. However, if you get a chance, could you restore the reference (#2) that seems to be broken? I can't seem to figure out which one it is, but it's likely one of the ones removed from that section. Thanks again, [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 02:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
113825 +++$+++ Ultraexactzz +++$+++ Hammersfan +++$+++ 113822 +++$+++ 113824 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.206612000E09 +++$+++ Nevermind, I've got the references fixed. Thanks,  +++$+++ :::Nevermind, I've got the references fixed. Thanks, [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 03:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

272495 +++$+++ Folajimi +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-20 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.150849440E09 +++$+++ Why on earth would I want to meddle with other people's signatures? Some of them are hard enough to read as it is! -- +++$+++ Why on earth would I want to meddle with other people's signatures? Some of them are hard enough to read as it is! --[[User:Folajimi|Folajimi]] 17:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
272496 +++$+++ Folajimi +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272495 +++$+++ 272495 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.150850460E09 +++$+++ Ah. The [[links (web browser)|culprit]] here happens to be the only manner by which I could correspond on that page; the [[Portable Firefox|conventional tool]] seems to choke on the sprawling page size. I will be sure to notify the affected parties on the appropriate talk page. -- +++$+++ *Ah. The [[links (web browser)|culprit]] here happens to be the only manner by which I could correspond on that page; the [[Portable Firefox|conventional tool]] seems to choke on the sprawling page size. I will be sure to notify the affected parties on the appropriate talk page. --[[User:Folajimi|Folajimi]] 17:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

10353 +++$+++ Steven Zhang +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.308509040E09 +++$+++ Hello. I noticed that you filed a fresh case for this user, but placed it in the archives. I've properly filed the case at the link listed above, but require some comments by you as to the reasons for filing a case, due to both accounts being blocked. Thanks. <font face=\"Forte\"> +++$+++ Hello. I noticed that you filed a fresh case for this user, but placed it in the archives. I've properly filed the case at the link listed above, but require some comments by you as to the reasons for filing a case, due to both accounts being blocked. Thanks. <font face="Forte">[[User:Steven Zhang|<font color="black">Steven Zhang</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Steven Zhang|<font color="#FFCC00">The clock is ticking....</font>]]</sup></font> 11:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
10354 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10353 +++$+++ 10353 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308781320E09 +++$+++ Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives\u2014which houses some of America's most important historical documents\u2014is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/NARA\/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]].  +++$+++ :Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]]. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

272498 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-21 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.150911600E09 +++$+++ Changed it once after it closed.  Sorry if it offended you, wasn't my intent. --  +++$+++ Changed it once after it closed.  Sorry if it offended you, wasn't my intent. -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|Samir]]   <small>[[User_talk:Samir_(The_Scope)|धर्म]]</small> 10:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
272499 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272498 +++$+++ 272498 +++$+++ 2006-06-24 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.151154060E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for replying.  I was feeling utterly horrible for the past few days for fear that I offended you.  Take care and a belated happy birthday.  --  +++$+++ :Thanks so much for replying.  I was feeling utterly horrible for the past few days for fear that I offended you.  Take care and a belated happy birthday.  -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|Samir]]   <small>[[User_talk:Samir_(The_Scope)|धर्म]]</small> 06:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

10355 +++$+++ DMacks +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10355 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.309832160E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Baltimore_Metro_Subway&diff=437749886&oldid=437510007 this edit], what does \"coordinates\" mean in respect to a miles-long subway line?  +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baltimore_Metro_Subway&diff=437749886&oldid=437510007 this edit], what does "coordinates" mean in respect to a miles-long subway line? [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 19:16, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
10356 +++$+++ Redrose64 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10355 +++$+++ 10355 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.309834500E09 +++$+++ See [[#Coords for railway lines]] above, also the related [[WT:UKRAIL#Railway line coordinates]]. -- +++$+++ :See [[#Coords for railway lines]] above, also the related [[WT:UKRAIL#Railway line coordinates]]. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#d30000; background:#ffeeee">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 19:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

10357 +++$+++ Elizabeth Blandra +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.309899300E09 +++$+++ Hi, Thanks for requesting a more complete citation. Per your request, \"original source\" information has been added. Please advise.  Thank you.   +++$+++ Hi, Thanks for requesting a more complete citation. Per your request, "original source" information has been added. Please advise.  Thank you.  [[User:Elizabeth Blandra|Elizabeth Blandra]] ([[User talk:Elizabeth Blandra|talk]]) 13:55, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
10358 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10357 +++$+++ 10357 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.309970580E09 +++$+++ Thank you! --  +++$+++ :Thank you! -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 09:43, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

272502 +++$+++ Mr. Turcotte +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-23 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.151112840E09 +++$+++ Enjoy your day!  +++$+++ Enjoy your day! [[User:Mr. Turcotte|<font color="Black">'''Mr. Turcotte'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mr. Turcotte|'''<font color="navy">''talk''</font>''']]</sup> 18:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
272503 +++$+++ Mr. Turcotte +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272502 +++$+++ 272502 +++$+++ 2006-06-25 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.151219400E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! :-)  +++$+++ :You're welcome! :-) [[User:Mr. Turcotte|<font color="Black">'''Mr. Turcotte'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mr. Turcotte|'''<font color="navy">''talk''</font>''']]</sup> 00:10, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

10359 +++$+++ Tagishsimon +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10359 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310003220E09 +++$+++ I've reverted [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Blair_Peach&action=historysubmit&diff=437794022&oldid=436379376 this edit] of yours. It is true that people don't in general have coordinates, BP is notably mainly for having been killed by the police on a certain Southall street corner. I think readers will tend to grok the meaning of the coords. -- +++$+++ I've reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blair_Peach&action=historysubmit&diff=437794022&oldid=436379376 this edit] of yours. It is true that people don't in general have coordinates, BP is notably mainly for having been killed by the police on a certain Southall street corner. I think readers will tend to grok the meaning of the coords. --[[User:Tagishsimon|Tagishsimon]] [[User_talk:Tagishsimon|(talk)]] 18:47, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
10360 +++$+++ Tagishsimon +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10359 +++$+++ 10359 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.310504340E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Blair_Peach&action=historysubmit&diff=439088353&oldid=438088598 Done.] -- +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blair_Peach&action=historysubmit&diff=439088353&oldid=438088598 Done.] --[[User:Tagishsimon|Tagishsimon]] [[User_talk:Tagishsimon|(talk)]] 13:59, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

10361 +++$+++ Lugnad +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.310360940E09 +++$+++ I see that you have added coord missing to all (or is it all?) ships.  By their nature they move about.  Although some have notable locations such as a rescue and some sink.  But just what coord do you have in mind? -  +++$+++ I see that you have added coord missing to all (or is it all?) ships.  By their nature they move about.  Although some have notable locations such as a rescue and some sink.  But just what coord do you have in mind? - [[User:Lugnad|Lugnad]] ([[User talk:Lugnad|talk]]) 22:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
10362 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10361 +++$+++ 10361 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310412000E09 +++$+++ The place of the sinking or rescue. I've tried only to add ships that were the subject of such events. If I've tagged any significant number of ships which weren't, please let me know, and I'll try to do another bot run to untag those. Otherwise, if they are few and far between, I suggest you just untag them when you see them. --  +++$+++ :The place of the sinking or rescue. I've tried only to add ships that were the subject of such events. If I've tagged any significant number of ships which weren't, please let me know, and I'll try to do another bot run to untag those. Otherwise, if they are few and far between, I suggest you just untag them when you see them. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 12:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
10363 +++$+++ Lugnad +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10361 +++$+++ 10362 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.310942040E09 +++$+++ OK  +++$+++ ::OK [[User:Lugnad|Lugnad]] ([[User talk:Lugnad|talk]]) 15:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

445526 +++$+++ Vince005 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ 445526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-15 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.297782540E09 +++$+++ Thanks also for the first tips.  +++$+++ Thanks also for the first tips. [[User:Vince005|Vince005]] ([[User talk:Vince005|talk]]) 07:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
445527 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ 445526 +++$+++ 445526 +++$+++ 2011-02-16 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.297902240E09 +++$+++ Hi Vince. Before you start writing about the [[City and County of San Francisco Environment Code]] you might want to make sure there are sufficient sources that have discussed it. I've had a look myself but can't really find anything that could be used. I may be wrong there though, but feel free to drop me a note once you've done some research if you want me to check what you've found. I noticed your comments at [[Talk:Wind farm]] btw - they look like they would make good additions to [[environmental effects of wind power]] so be bold and add them!  +++$+++ :Hi Vince. Before you start writing about the [[City and County of San Francisco Environment Code]] you might want to make sure there are sufficient sources that have discussed it. I've had a look myself but can't really find anything that could be used. I may be wrong there though, but feel free to drop me a note once you've done some research if you want me to check what you've found. I noticed your comments at [[Talk:Wind farm]] btw - they look like they would make good additions to [[environmental effects of wind power]] so be bold and add them! [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 16:24, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

10365 +++$+++ Singularity42 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10365 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310582940E09 +++$+++ Hope that helps.  +++$+++ Hope that helps. [[User:Singularity42|Singularity42]] ([[User talk:Singularity42|talk]]) 11:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
10366 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10365 +++$+++ 10365 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.310610960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. That certainly seems to have triggered my filter: I've now activated it to block edits matching its pattern. --  +++$+++ :Thanks. That certainly seems to have triggered my filter: I've now activated it to block edits matching its pattern. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 19:36, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

10368 +++$+++ Theoprakt +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311432360E09 +++$+++ How did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Belphegor&diff=next&oldid=401387844 this] come about? Or, to put the question more generally: are you sure you should geobot anything that is in a subcategory of [[:Category:Deities, spirits, and mythic beings]] or [[:Category:Mythological_characters]] ? --  +++$+++ How did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Belphegor&diff=next&oldid=401387844 this] come about? Or, to put the question more generally: are you sure you should geobot anything that is in a subcategory of [[:Category:Deities, spirits, and mythic beings]] or [[:Category:Mythological_characters]] ? -- [[User:Theoprakt|Theoprakt]] ([[User talk:Theoprakt|talk]]) 07:46, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
10369 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10368 +++$+++ 10368 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311444600E09 +++$+++ Agh! The bot had picked the coordinates up from the German-language Wikipedia article. I had thought I had sufficient checks in place to stop things like that from happening, but I was wrong: the bot currently checks for the words \"gods\", \"goddesses\", \"deities\", \"legend\", \"legends\", etc. etc. but not \"demons\". I'll add a few more keyword cut-off tests to stop that from happening again. I've now also checked for other tagging within the category trees you suggested, and removed a more few misplaced {{tl|coord}} and {{tl|coord missing}} tags by hand. Everything else seems to be OK. --  +++$+++ :Agh! The bot had picked the coordinates up from the German-language Wikipedia article. I had thought I had sufficient checks in place to stop things like that from happening, but I was wrong: the bot currently checks for the words "gods", "goddesses", "deities", "legend", "legends", etc. etc. but not "demons". I'll add a few more keyword cut-off tests to stop that from happening again. I've now also checked for other tagging within the category trees you suggested, and removed a more few misplaced {{tl|coord}} and {{tl|coord missing}} tags by hand. Everything else seems to be OK. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 11:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

10370 +++$+++ Hoverfish +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311465600E09 +++$+++ Hi, The Anomebot2 added a missing geodata template in [[Ruta Interbalnearia]]. I am not sure if this is a mistake or not. I know about cities and places, but how does one add geodata to a highway? Is there some special template to show 2 geodata for the beginning and the end of a road or what?  +++$+++ Hi, The Anomebot2 added a missing geodata template in [[Ruta Interbalnearia]]. I am not sure if this is a mistake or not. I know about cities and places, but how does one add geodata to a highway? Is there some special template to show 2 geodata for the beginning and the end of a road or what? [[User:Hoverfish|Hoverfish]] <small>[[User talk:Hoverfish|Talk]]</small> 17:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
10371 +++$+++ Redrose64 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10370 +++$+++ 10370 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.311466020E09 +++$+++ This is essentially [[#Coords for railway lines]] (earlier) in another form. -- +++$+++ :This is essentially [[#Coords for railway lines]] (earlier) in another form. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#d30000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 17:07, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
10372 +++$+++ Hoverfish +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10370 +++$+++ 10371 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.311484800E09 +++$+++ Here's my five cents: I do not think it is practical to give coords for a middle point of Routes. I have looked around a bit and the only place I happened to find such coords is in [[Bundesautobahn 2]]. In this example there is an important junction in a city near the centre, so it makes sense, but in some Routes like [[Route 10 (Uruguay)|Route 10]] which consist of 3 or more separate fragments, defining any \"central\" point on them is too arbitrary. Also some routes are important and wide for a part of their length only, so their \"middle\" is not anything to go by. I would be happy with 2 points, but I know this is not practical in searching. I think an important destination (city or big town) somewhere between 1\/3 and 2\/3 of their length should be picked. But cases like Route 10 need more coords, maybe inline.  +++$+++ ::Here's my five cents: I do not think it is practical to give coords for a middle point of Routes. I have looked around a bit and the only place I happened to find such coords is in [[Bundesautobahn 2]]. In this example there is an important junction in a city near the centre, so it makes sense, but in some Routes like [[Route 10 (Uruguay)|Route 10]] which consist of 3 or more separate fragments, defining any "central" point on them is too arbitrary. Also some routes are important and wide for a part of their length only, so their "middle" is not anything to go by. I would be happy with 2 points, but I know this is not practical in searching. I think an important destination (city or big town) somewhere between 1/3 and 2/3 of their length should be picked. But cases like Route 10 need more coords, maybe inline. [[User:Hoverfish|Hoverfish]] <small>[[User talk:Hoverfish|Talk]]</small> 22:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

272518 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272518 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-17 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.153130580E09 +++$+++ ''' +++$+++ '''[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]]''' ([[User talk:wknight94|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Wknight94|contribs]]) 03:03, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
272519 +++$+++ Daniel.Bryant +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272518 +++$+++ 272518 +++$+++ 2006-08-12 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.155398700E09 +++$+++ My apologies for adding the colon - I am a neat-freak, but I now know why you did it. Sorry. '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|<font face=\"tahoma\" color=\"#086F9A\">Daniel<\/font>]]. +++$+++ :My apologies for adding the colon - I am a neat-freak, but I now know why you did it. Sorry. '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|<font face="tahoma" color="#086F9A">Daniel</font>]].[[User:Daniel.Bryant/Esperanza|<font face="tahoma" color="green">Bryant</font>]]''' 09:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

10377 +++$+++ Grim23 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311882540E09 +++$+++ Hello, I've noticed you added the ISO code \"LON\" to some articles in Greater London. [[ISO 3166-2:GB]] only seems to specify codes for individual boroughs. (I've added these to [[Category talk:London articles missing geocoordinate data]]). The borough boundaries can be found in purple on Bing Maps, if you switch to \"London Street Map\", sometimes you need to zoom in a bit. If you let me know I'm happy to add borough ISO codes or to verify any British coordinates. Incidentally I suspected that that corner was the location of [[Will's Coffee House]] but wasn't bold enough to geocode it.  +++$+++ Hello, I've noticed you added the ISO code "LON" to some articles in Greater London. [[ISO 3166-2:GB]] only seems to specify codes for individual boroughs. (I've added these to [[Category talk:London articles missing geocoordinate data]]). The borough boundaries can be found in purple on Bing Maps, if you switch to "London Street Map", sometimes you need to zoom in a bit. If you let me know I'm happy to add borough ISO codes or to verify any British coordinates. Incidentally I suspected that that corner was the location of [[Will's Coffee House]] but wasn't bold enough to geocode it. [[User:Grim23|<b style="color:#000000">G</b><b style="color:#660000">ri</b><b style="color:#990000">m</b><sup><b style="color:#CC0000">2</b><b style="color:#FF0000">3</b></sup>]][[User talk:Grim23|<font color="black">★</font>]] 12:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
10378 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10377 +++$+++ 10377 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311886560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up. I clearly mis-remembered the GB-LON thing -- fortunately, I've only done a few of these -- trying to be too clever, I'm afraid. I'd greatly appreciate your help in putting the right codes in for these. Regarding Will's Coffee House: I found a quite specific second source for that location via one of the links given in the article, so I'm pretty sure it's the right place. --  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up. I clearly mis-remembered the GB-LON thing -- fortunately, I've only done a few of these -- trying to be too clever, I'm afraid. I'd greatly appreciate your help in putting the right codes in for these. Regarding Will's Coffee House: I found a quite specific second source for that location via one of the links given in the article, so I'm pretty sure it's the right place. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 13:56, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
10379 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10377 +++$+++ 10377 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311886740E09 +++$+++ ''Update:'' I think you've got them all. Thanks for fixing them, and for adding the appropriate codes to the category talk page. --  +++$+++ :''Update:'' I think you've got them all. Thanks for fixing them, and for adding the appropriate codes to the category talk page. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 13:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
10380 +++$+++ Redrose64 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10377 +++$+++ 10379 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.311978180E09 +++$+++ Hi, if you intend adding region codes for London boroughs to the {{tlx|coord}} for London railway stations, please note that most such articles don't have a visible {{tlx|coord}}. Instead, they often specify the coords by means of {{para|latitude}}{{para|longitude}} in the {{tlx|Infobox London station}}. In such cases, the {{para|coord_region}} parameter is now available, see for example [[Kentish Town station]]. -- +++$+++ ::Hi, if you intend adding region codes for London boroughs to the {{tlx|coord}} for London railway stations, please note that most such articles don't have a visible {{tlx|coord}}. Instead, they often specify the coords by means of {{para|latitude}}{{para|longitude}} in the {{tlx|Infobox London station}}. In such cases, the {{para|coord_region}} parameter is now available, see for example [[Kentish Town station]]. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#d30000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 15:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

534667 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534667 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-23 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.193194140E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 19:49, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
534668 +++$+++ A._Exeunt +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534667 +++$+++ 534667 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.193508540E09 +++$+++ Disregard everything stated above; I've made the rationales valid again. Be advised that when you add fair use rationale for images, you need to add one for '''''every''''' article and '''''you MUST state the name of the article that the fair use rationale applies to'''''. On another note...how have you been? We haven't communicated ever since that heated debate over Why1991's Mystery Game. I'm supposed to be on a Wikibreak, but I've got some spare time. --  +++$+++ :Disregard everything stated above; I've made the rationales valid again. Be advised that when you add fair use rationale for images, you need to add one for '''''every''''' article and '''''you MUST state the name of the article that the fair use rationale applies to'''''. On another note...how have you been? We haven't communicated ever since that heated debate over Why1991's Mystery Game. I'm supposed to be on a Wikibreak, but I've got some spare time. -- [[User:A. Exeunt|<font color="#40826D" face="palatino linotype">Altiris</font>]] [[User talk:A. Exeunt|<font color="#ED9121" face="Constantia">Helios</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/A._Exeunt|<font color="#66023C" face="continuum medium">Exeunt</font>]] 11:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
534669 +++$+++ A._Exeunt +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534667 +++$+++ 534668 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.193508720E09 +++$+++ Yeuch! You're an administrator now? Congratulations!<!--A bit too negligible in size for a congratulation, but I don't like large text...--> --  +++$+++ ::Yeuch! You're an administrator now? Congratulations!<!--A bit too negligible in size for a congratulation, but I don't like large text...--> -- [[User:A. Exeunt|<font color="#40826D" face="palatino linotype">Altiris</font>]] [[User talk:A. Exeunt|<font color="#ED9121" face="Constantia">Helios</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/A._Exeunt|<font color="#66023C" face="continuum medium">Exeunt</font>]] 11:12, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

550275 +++$+++ Tonycdp +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-23 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.161640200E09 +++$+++ Could you please block me indefinitely. If you can't then what do I need to do to get blocked indefinitely? +++$+++ Could you please block me indefinitely. If you can't then what do I need to do to get blocked indefinitely?[[User:Tonycdp|Tonycdp]] 14:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
550276 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550275 +++$+++ 550275 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.161643440E09 +++$+++ Sorry, that's not possible: \"Blocking to enforce a Wikiholiday or departure is specifically prohibited.\" [[WP:BLOCK]] But, what you can do is generate a random password (you can use [http:\/\/fly.srk.fer.hr\/~nick\/bin\/rand.php a script I wrote]) and change your password to it. Make it long enough so you can't remember it. And then you won't be able to login again, same as if you have been indefblocked. -- +++$+++ : Sorry, that's not possible: "Blocking to enforce a Wikiholiday or departure is specifically prohibited." [[WP:BLOCK]] But, what you can do is generate a random password (you can use [http://fly.srk.fer.hr/~nick/bin/rand.php a script I wrote]) and change your password to it. Make it long enough so you can't remember it. And then you won't be able to login again, same as if you have been indefblocked. --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 15:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
550277 +++$+++ Tonycdp +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550275 +++$+++ 550276 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.161644340E09 +++$+++ Oh I see. How many times do I have to blank this page to get blocked indefinitely. +++$+++ ::Oh I see. How many times do I have to blank this page to get blocked indefinitely.[[User:Tonycdp|Tonycdp]] 15:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
550278 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550275 +++$+++ 550277 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.161647100E09 +++$+++ Check this out: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#User:Tonycdp_wants_to_be_indefblocked]. -- +++$+++ ::: Check this out: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Tonycdp_wants_to_be_indefblocked]. --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 16:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
550279 +++$+++ Tonycdp +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550275 +++$+++ 550278 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.161648000E09 +++$+++ I've looked at it. People seem happy for you to go ahead. I connect wirelessly to this IP address, you may consider not blocking it if possible, but whatever the case I wont be editing any longer, that's a promise :) +++$+++ :::: I've looked at it. People seem happy for you to go ahead. I connect wirelessly to this IP address, you may consider not blocking it if possible, but whatever the case I wont be editing any longer, that's a promise :)[[User:Tonycdp|Tonycdp]] 17:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
550280 +++$+++ the wub +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550275 +++$+++ 550279 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.161649440E09 +++$+++ Scrambling your password and disabling e-mail is a good solution, there's no way you can get back in after that. I think I know another way, it is possible to prevent you logging in using a script in your user javascript. This will stop you from logging in, yet avoid any collateral damage for others wanting to use the IP. Is it ok if I do this? I presume you use the default monobook skin?  +++$+++ :::::Scrambling your password and disabling e-mail is a good solution, there's no way you can get back in after that. I think I know another way, it is possible to prevent you logging in using a script in your user javascript. This will stop you from logging in, yet avoid any collateral damage for others wanting to use the IP. Is it ok if I do this? I presume you use the default monobook skin? [[User:the wub|the wub]] [[User_talk:The wub|<font color="green">"?!"</font>]] 17:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
550281 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550275 +++$+++ 550280 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.161649680E09 +++$+++ I blocked him. It's quite sad to see a person requesting a block, but I think that at this point we are loosing too much time on this discussion because it is evident that he decided to be indefblocked. Of course, everybody's free to wear suns^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hunblock him, I don't want to have anything with this any more, if you think I shouldn't have done this, just unblock him. -- +++$+++ :::::: I blocked him. It's quite sad to see a person requesting a block, but I think that at this point we are loosing too much time on this discussion because it is evident that he decided to be indefblocked. Of course, everybody's free to wear suns^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hunblock him, I don't want to have anything with this any more, if you think I shouldn't have done this, just unblock him. --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 17:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
550282 +++$+++ the wub +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550275 +++$+++ 550281 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.161650880E09 +++$+++ No, I'm not really bothered. It is a shame though.  +++$+++ :::::::No, I'm not really bothered. It is a shame though. [[User:the wub|the wub]] [[User_talk:The wub|<font color="green">"?!"</font>]] 17:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

10381 +++$+++ StormContent +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.312228620E09 +++$+++ It was apparent that this user is a vandalism-only account, but have you known that his usnername is quite disruptive?  +++$+++ It was apparent that this user is a vandalism-only account, but have you known that his usnername is quite disruptive? [[User:StormContent|StormContent]] ([[User talk:StormContent|talk]]) 12:57, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
10382 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ 10381 +++$+++ 10381 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312228920E09 +++$+++ You're quite right that the username is borderline disruptive, but since they had already qualified for indefblocking as a vandalism-only account, it didn't seem necessary to add that to the block at the time. --  +++$+++ :You're quite right that the username is borderline disruptive, but since they had already qualified for indefblocking as a vandalism-only account, it didn't seem necessary to add that to the block at the time. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 13:02, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

272526 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-08 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.152388920E09 +++$+++ I've noticed you around, and wasn't sure if you were an admin. I see from the list that you're not, but I think you're suited to being one. A drawback for some people would be only 2,200 edits, but you've been here for 10 months with good edit summary usage and I think your contributions show a sensible and knowledgeable outlook, as well as balanced participation in project space and main name space. I'd be happy to nominate you, if you feel ready and wish it.  +++$+++ I've noticed you around, and wasn't sure if you were an admin. I see from the list that you're not, but I think you're suited to being one. A drawback for some people would be only 2,200 edits, but you've been here for 10 months with good edit summary usage and I think your contributions show a sensible and knowledgeable outlook, as well as balanced participation in project space and main name space. I'd be happy to nominate you, if you feel ready and wish it. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 13:02, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
272527 +++$+++ Bhadani +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272526 +++$+++ 272526 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.152479040E09 +++$+++ I would second! -- +++$+++ :I would second! --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] 14:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

272529 +++$+++ Srose +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272529 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-10 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.152567540E09 +++$+++ I reverted a bit of vandalism by [[User:Litch|Litch]].  I just thought you should know so that you can be on the look out. =)  +++$+++ I reverted a bit of vandalism by [[User:Litch|Litch]].  I just thought you should know so that you can be on the look out. =) [[User:Srose|<b>Srose</b>]] [[User talk:Srose|<font color="hotpink">(talk)</font>]] 14:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
272530 +++$+++ Srose +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272529 +++$+++ 272529 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.152578700E09 +++$+++ Lovely.  Thanks for the heads-up.  I'll have to keep an eye on it. Hope all turns out in your favor - I'm sure it will. =)  +++$+++ *Lovely.  Thanks for the heads-up.  I'll have to keep an eye on it. Hope all turns out in your favor - I'm sure it will. =) [[User:Srose|<b>Srose</b>]] [[User talk:Srose|<font color="hotpink">(talk)</font>]] 17:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
272531 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272529 +++$+++ 272530 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.152616740E09 +++$+++ I suggest you refrain for now from responding to any provocation from [[User:Litch|Litch]]. You have explained as much as you can, and you will end up getting very frustrated. Keep me posted on my talk page.  +++$+++ ::I suggest you refrain for now from responding to any provocation from [[User:Litch|Litch]]. You have explained as much as you can, and you will end up getting very frustrated. Keep me posted on my talk page. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 04:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

534676 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-15 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.221466380E09 +++$+++ Hey, if you don't mind please but just to wait till after the ppv to place the table in because the IPS hate the thing and I do not want to bother with them at the moment.-- +++$+++ Hey, if you don't mind please but just to wait till after the ppv to place the table in because the IPS hate the thing and I do not want to bother with them at the moment.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 01:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
534677 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534676 +++$+++ 534676 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.221467100E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about it man, for you to know I'm really the only one that watches the article. If it wasn't for me that article wouldn't even exist because no one wants to expand the TNA ppvs. IPs just annoy me because they keep removing stuff and are pissed half the time so I would rather not deal with them removing the table all the time. That is why I'm going to expand TNA's main ppv Bound for Glory in a sandbox so I don't deal with them.-- +++$+++ :Don't worry about it man, for you to know I'm really the only one that watches the article. If it wasn't for me that article wouldn't even exist because no one wants to expand the TNA ppvs. IPs just annoy me because they keep removing stuff and are pissed half the time so I would rather not deal with them removing the table all the time. That is why I'm going to expand TNA's main ppv Bound for Glory in a sandbox so I don't deal with them.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 01:25, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
534678 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534676 +++$+++ 534677 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.221467880E09 +++$+++ Yeah sure that would be great however I believe it wouldn't work out. Since I plan on making BFG a FA so I'm going to go at it a totally different way and I'm hard to work with on stuff. But while I have you here, could you read [[Slammiversary (2008)]] in my [[User:Wrestlinglover\/Slammiversary (2008)|Sandbox]]. I'm almost done with it but I would like to know how the background sounds so far.-- +++$+++ ::Yeah sure that would be great however I believe it wouldn't work out. Since I plan on making BFG a FA so I'm going to go at it a totally different way and I'm hard to work with on stuff. But while I have you here, could you read [[Slammiversary (2008)]] in my [[User:Wrestlinglover/Slammiversary (2008)|Sandbox]]. I'm almost done with it but I would like to know how the background sounds so far.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 01:38, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
534679 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534676 +++$+++ 534678 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.221469200E09 +++$+++ Okay, I was just wondering because I haven't worked on it in a few days and I just started on the event last night. I'm behind schedule on it. I just wanted to make sure I'm getting somewhere since I quit and put more focus on [[Hard Justice (2008)|Hard Justice]] than it.-- +++$+++ :::Okay, I was just wondering because I haven't worked on it in a few days and I just started on the event last night. I'm behind schedule on it. I just wanted to make sure I'm getting somewhere since I quit and put more focus on [[Hard Justice (2008)|Hard Justice]] than it.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 02:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

272535 +++$+++ Ehmjay +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272535 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-13 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.152782760E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. I have a rather large request. The MJ discussion page is becoming a continuingly growing place of vandalism, non-discussion, and I'm getting frusterated. I've been trying to revert things to the best of my ability and to the best of my knowledge of Wiki policy and now people are acusing me of making changes because i disagree with their comments or because I'm trying to dictate what should and should not be discussed. I'm not trying to do so, I'm only trying to remove POV and vandalism and nonsence. It would be really great if someone could make changes who is impartial because it is becoming extremely frusterating as I am not impartial. I dont know if you want to or can suggest someone else to do so but any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Also - I beleive that 195.93.21.66 needs a reminder of his behaviour. Thanks for all your help so far.  +++$+++ Hi Sarah. I have a rather large request. The MJ discussion page is becoming a continuingly growing place of vandalism, non-discussion, and I'm getting frusterated. I've been trying to revert things to the best of my ability and to the best of my knowledge of Wiki policy and now people are acusing me of making changes because i disagree with their comments or because I'm trying to dictate what should and should not be discussed. I'm not trying to do so, I'm only trying to remove POV and vandalism and nonsence. It would be really great if someone could make changes who is impartial because it is becoming extremely frusterating as I am not impartial. I dont know if you want to or can suggest someone else to do so but any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Also - I beleive that 195.93.21.66 needs a reminder of his behaviour. Thanks for all your help so far. [[User:Ehmjay|:: ehmjay]] 02:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
272536 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272535 +++$+++ 272535 +++$+++ 2006-07-13 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.152785820E09 +++$+++ I've left a note on the article talk page.  +++$+++ :I've left a note on the article talk page. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 03:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

534680 +++$+++ MartinBot +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-29 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.177906680E09 +++$+++ Your recent edit to [[:Fistandantilus]] ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fistandantilus&diff=126946150&oldid=124651542 diff]) was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair [[Wikipedia:vandalism|vandalism]] to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies \u2013 if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. '''[[User:Tawkerbot2\/FAQ|Click here]]''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. \/\/  +++$+++ Your recent edit to [[:Fistandantilus]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fistandantilus&diff=126946150&oldid=124651542 diff]) was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair [[Wikipedia:vandalism|vandalism]] to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. '''[[User:Tawkerbot2/FAQ|Click here]]''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. // [[User:MartinBot|MartinBot]] 21:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
534681 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534680 +++$+++ 534680 +++$+++ 2007-04-29 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.177906740E09 +++$+++ Made a slight error in a redirect, appeared as though I'd blanked a page.  Mistake.  '''''<font color=\"darkblue\"> +++$+++ :Made a slight error in a redirect, appeared as though I'd blanked a page.  Mistake.  '''''<font color="darkblue">[[User:DoomsDay349|Dooms]]</font><font color="lightblue">[[User talk:DoomsDay349|Day349]]</font>''''' 21:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

272539 +++$+++ gwernol +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272539 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-16 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.153050360E09 +++$+++ In your last edit you somehow removed Deon555's most recent comments. Looks like it was an edit conflict? You might want to revert and reapply your comment? Best,  +++$+++ In your last edit you somehow removed Deon555's most recent comments. Looks like it was an edit conflict? You might want to revert and reapply your comment? Best, [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 04:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
272540 +++$+++ gwernol +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272539 +++$+++ 272539 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.153050960E09 +++$+++ No worries, looks like its fixed up now. With the number of edits flying I'm not surprised it happened. No harm done. Best,  +++$+++ :No worries, looks like its fixed up now. With the number of edits flying I'm not surprised it happened. No harm done. Best, [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 04:56, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

272542 +++$+++ TransylvanianKarl +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-16 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.153086420E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your english help. -- +++$+++ Thank you for your english help. --[[User:TransylvanianKarl|TransylvanianKarl]] 14:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
272543 +++$+++ TransylvanianKarl +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272542 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.153529460E09 +++$+++ Hell\xf3 Sarah! Thank you for your encouragement. I have a special method.(''That is good language practice too.'') Usually if I try to draft something in english, after I write it in the [http:\/\/www.metamorpho.hu\/en\/ translator software]. If the software understand my english that is a good feedback for me. If the program can not understand my words or sentences I must search the mistakes.  I use the  [http:\/\/szotar.sztaki.hu\/angol-magyar online dictionary of Hungarian Academy of Sciences] I dont know how good is my english actually. But the article of International Churches of Christ is very important for me because I think on the internet there are a many inequitable criticism link about the ICOC. (I think the ICOC criticism's websites organizations are motivate by [[pentecostalism]] and [[protestantism]]'s. This is sometimes manifest, and sometimes undercover.) And I think I can do something in the wikipedia. I find  the wikipedia's ICOC article is very darker than the reality and for a long while isn't neutral. Thanks for your message. It is a good feedback for me, how understandable what I write. -- +++$+++ ::Helló Sarah! Thank you for your encouragement. I have a special method.(''That is good language practice too.'') Usually if I try to draft something in english, after I write it in the [http://www.metamorpho.hu/en/ translator software]. If the software understand my english that is a good feedback for me. If the program can not understand my words or sentences I must search the mistakes.  I use the  [http://szotar.sztaki.hu/angol-magyar online dictionary of Hungarian Academy of Sciences] I dont know how good is my english actually. But the article of International Churches of Christ is very important for me because I think on the internet there are a many inequitable criticism link about the ICOC. (I think the ICOC criticism's websites organizations are motivate by [[pentecostalism]] and [[protestantism]]'s. This is sometimes manifest, and sometimes undercover.) And I think I can do something in the wikipedia. I find  the wikipedia's ICOC article is very darker than the reality and for a long while isn't neutral. Thanks for your message. It is a good feedback for me, how understandable what I write. --[[User:TransylvanianKarl|TransylvanianKarl]] 17:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

272544 +++$+++ Abcdefghijklm +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-16 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.153091880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your kind message. Really, I knew the RfA was not going to be sucessful, and I will be withdrawing it later today (I was going to keep it open for a bit longer, just to gather in a few more comments, if nothing else). I realise I need more experience, and that I definately put up my candidacy too early, although I felt it was my duty to the community to let them judge whether I was  ready. Many thanks.  +++$+++ Thanks for your kind message. Really, I knew the RfA was not going to be sucessful, and I will be withdrawing it later today (I was going to keep it open for a bit longer, just to gather in a few more comments, if nothing else). I realise I need more experience, and that I definately put up my candidacy too early, although I felt it was my duty to the community to let them judge whether I was  ready. Many thanks. [[User:Abcdefghijklm|Abcdefghijklm]] 16:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
272545 +++$+++ Abcdefghijklm +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272544 +++$+++ 272544 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.153093500E09 +++$+++ Hi again, I have recently done an editor review, and did get some good feedback from one user, he also helped me with templates. I was looking at an RfA to be an admin, although I didn't think it would be succesful, I felt it was right to offer my services to the community. I will withdraw sooner rather than later now, and I might consider it again in a few months, I am certainly happy to wait!!  +++$+++ :Hi again, I have recently done an editor review, and did get some good feedback from one user, he also helped me with templates. I was looking at an RfA to be an admin, although I didn't think it would be succesful, I felt it was right to offer my services to the community. I will withdraw sooner rather than later now, and I might consider it again in a few months, I am certainly happy to wait!! [[User:Abcdefghijklm|Abcdefghijklm]] 16:45, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

10403 +++$+++ Ositadinma +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10403 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-30 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.256957640E09 +++$+++ Could you tell me your source for Meacham wearing #14, and will Dave Clark switch back to 3rd base when Pedrique was hired as the bench coach? ''' +++$+++ Could you tell me your source for Meacham wearing #14, and will Dave Clark switch back to 3rd base when Pedrique was hired as the bench coach? '''[[User:Ositadinma|<font color="CA001A">Osi</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Ositadinma|<font color="192F6B">tadinma</font>]]'' 19:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
10404 +++$+++ Ositadinma +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10403 +++$+++ 10403 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.256958120E09 +++$+++ No, I am refering to Meacham's number. The link only tells what coaches were hired. Also could you please sign your posts so I can tell who sent that info to me. Thank you. ''' +++$+++ :No, I am refering to Meacham's number. The link only tells what coaches were hired. Also could you please sign your posts so I can tell who sent that info to me. Thank you. '''[[User:Ositadinma|<font color="CA001A">Osi</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Ositadinma|<font color="192F6B">tadinma</font>]]'' 20:02, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

559005 +++$+++ Yankees76 +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 559005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-22 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.179900900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking swift and decisive action with regards to today's incidents - and more importantly for trusting my judgement on these socks. Best regards -- +++$+++ Thanks for taking swift and decisive action with regards to today's incidents - and more importantly for trusting my judgement on these socks. Best regards --[[User:Yankees76|Yankees76]] 23:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
559006 +++$+++  +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 559005 +++$+++ 559005 +++$+++ 2007-05-22 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.179901020E09 +++$+++ No problem. I did check up on the editing backgrounds and I agreed with your judgment. \xb7\xb7[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=\" font-variant: small-caps\" >l<\/span>]][[ user talk: coelacan |acan]] 23:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :No problem. I did check up on the editing backgrounds and I agreed with your judgment. ··[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=" font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>]][[ user talk: coelacan |acan]] 23:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
559007 +++$+++ Yankees76 +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 559005 +++$+++ 559006 +++$+++ 2007-05-23 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.179907080E09 +++$+++ A couple of new ones to add to the list: [[User:Querllat]], [[User:FankY76]] and [[User:Mezzdrecker]]. Further validates a correct decision. Cheers. -- +++$+++ ::A couple of new ones to add to the list: [[User:Querllat]], [[User:FankY76]] and [[User:Mezzdrecker]]. Further validates a correct decision. Cheers. --[[User:Yankees76|Yankees76]] 00:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

272554 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-20 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.153379880E09 +++$+++ Aloha, Sarah, and thanks for the update and welcome back.  I want to also wish you a happy, but belated birthday.  Btw, if you ever do run for admin, let me know so I can support you.  Cheers.  &mdash; +++$+++ Aloha, Sarah, and thanks for the update and welcome back.  I want to also wish you a happy, but belated birthday.  Btw, if you ever do run for admin, let me know so I can support you.  Cheers.  &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 00:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
272555 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272554 +++$+++ 272554 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.153404000E09 +++$+++ As far as the 3RR on Daffy Duck goes, I have already blocked him for NPA. Thanks, ''' +++$+++ :As far as the 3RR on Daffy Duck goes, I have already blocked him for NPA. Thanks, '''[[User:Blnguyen|Blnguyen]]''' <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[User talk:Blnguyen|rant-line]] 07:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
272556 +++$+++ CovenantD +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272554 +++$+++ 272555 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.153467780E09 +++$+++ Just thought I'd let you know that Daffy is right back at it again.  +++$+++ ::Just thought I'd let you know that Daffy is right back at it again. [[User:CovenantD|CovenantD]] 00:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
272557 +++$+++ CovenantD +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272554 +++$+++ 272554 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.153470060E09 +++$+++ ...Aaand he's been reported for Personal attacks.  +++$+++ :...Aaand he's been reported for Personal attacks. [[User:CovenantD|CovenantD]] 01:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

10411 +++$+++ Yankees10 +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-07 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.260253920E09 +++$+++ If a player signs a major league contract with a team please try to remember to add the new teams category, thanks.-- +++$+++ If a player signs a major league contract with a team please try to remember to add the new teams category, thanks.--[[User:Yankees10|Yankees10]] 22:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
10412 +++$+++ Yankees10 +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10411 +++$+++ 10411 +++$+++ 2009-12-16 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.261028460E09 +++$+++ Again please remember to add the categories.-- +++$+++ :Again please remember to add the categories.--[[User:Yankees10|Yankees10]] 21:41, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
10413 +++$+++ Halvorsen brian +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10411 +++$+++ 10412 +++$+++ 2010-01-07 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.262857800E09 +++$+++ Actually, please don't. Consensus doesn't agree, see [[WT:WPBB#Categories and Infobox]]. -- +++$+++ ::Actually, please don't. Consensus doesn't agree, see [[WT:WPBB#Categories and Infobox]]. --[[User:Halvorsen brian|Brian Halvorsen]] ([[User talk:Halvorsen brian|talk]]) 01:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

534701 +++$+++ TonyTheTiger +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-30 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.180510080E09 +++$+++ Sometimes, I am a little dense, but the section you say is poorly cited has 6 citations for 14 lines of text and you say it has an unreferenced quote where I see none. I am considering requesting a review. Please point out the unreferenced quote. [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|talk]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|cont]]\/[[User:TonyTheTiger\/Antonio Vernon|bio]]\/ +++$+++ Sometimes, I am a little dense, but the section you say is poorly cited has 6 citations for 14 lines of text and you say it has an unreferenced quote where I see none. I am considering requesting a review. Please point out the unreferenced quote. [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|cont]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM|tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]])</small> 00:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
534702 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534701 +++$+++ 534701 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.180511820E09 +++$+++ Issue resolved.  '''''<font color=\"darkblue\"> +++$+++ :Issue resolved.  '''''<font color="darkblue">[[User:DoomsDay349|Dooms]]</font><font color="lightblue">[[User talk:DoomsDay349|Day349]]</font>''''' 00:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
534703 +++$+++ JNW +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534701 +++$+++ 534701 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.180527120E09 +++$+++ Hi, Dooms. You might want to have another look at Haystacks (M). Let Tony or me know whether the sources do the trick. Many thanks,  +++$+++ *Hi, Dooms. You might want to have another look at Haystacks (M). Let Tony or me know whether the sources do the trick. Many thanks, [[User:JNW|JNW]] 05:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
534704 +++$+++ TonyTheTiger +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534701 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.180666980E09 +++$+++ Thanks. We will repost after getting [[WP:PR]] feedback. In the future, if you feel a fail comes down to a handful of citations and have no other direction you may want to consider a GA on hold. [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|talk]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|cont]]\/[[User:TonyTheTiger\/Antonio Vernon|bio]]\/ +++$+++ *** Thanks. We will repost after getting [[WP:PR]] feedback. In the future, if you feel a fail comes down to a handful of citations and have no other direction you may want to consider a GA on hold. [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|cont]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM|tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]])</small> 20:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

272560 +++$+++ Yankeefan2006.. +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-27 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.154019840E09 +++$+++ I'm not that eddie user as other are leanding you to believe, please discuss this on my tak page  +++$+++ I'm not that eddie user as other are leanding you to believe, please discuss this on my tak page [[User:Yankeefan2006..|YankeeFan2006]] 10:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
272561 +++$+++ Yankeefan2006.. +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272560 +++$+++ 272560 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.154020380E09 +++$+++ please see [[Wikipedia:Request_for_comment\/Yankeefan2006..]]  +++$+++ :please see [[Wikipedia:Request_for_comment/Yankeefan2006..]] [[User:Yankeefan2006..|YankeeFan2006]] 10:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

526024 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-02 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.151868060E09 +++$+++ I threw up my 1st draft of the new feature article on the Coordination page.  The paragraph needs some editing.  If you could make a few chops and add a little bit that would be great.  If you could put it up in the window when you are done that would be great.  Thanks-- +++$+++ I threw up my 1st draft of the new feature article on the Coordination page.  The paragraph needs some editing.  If you could make a few chops and add a little bit that would be great.  If you could put it up in the window when you are done that would be great.  Thanks--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 12:21, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
526025 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526024 +++$+++ 526024 +++$+++ 2006-07-02 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.151892720E09 +++$+++ Still some work to do.  Can be posted once we have completed the updates. &mdash;  +++$+++ * Still some work to do.  Can be posted once we have completed the updates. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) @ 19:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

272563 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272563 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-31 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.154364180E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah,<br> I know.. I feel '''terrible''' :'(<br>-- +++$+++ Hi Sarah,<br> I know.. I feel '''terrible''' :'(<br>--[[User:Deon555|Deon555]]|[[User_talk:Deon555|talk]]|<font color="green">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]</font> 09:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
272564 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272563 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.154364540E09 +++$+++ Please don't feel bad about it. I think everyone knows that you're very enthusiastic and acting in complete good faith, it's just something to keep in mind in future. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 09:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ ::Please don't feel bad about it. I think everyone knows that you're very enthusiastic and acting in complete good faith, it's just something to keep in mind in future. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 09:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
272565 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272563 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.154364780E09 +++$+++ Thanks ;) I'll keep it in mind. -- +++$+++ :::Thanks ;) I'll keep it in mind. --[[User:Deon555|Deon555]]|[[User_talk:Deon555|talk]]|<font color="green">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]</font> 09:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

10421 +++$+++ GoodDay +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-07 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.286490000E09 +++$+++ What happened to alternate captain Matt Green? We should'n't be hiding veteran players from their rosters.  +++$+++ What happened to alternate captain Matt Green? We should'n't be hiding veteran players from their rosters. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 15:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
10422 +++$+++ GoodDay +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10421 +++$+++ 10421 +++$+++ 2010-10-07 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.286490180E09 +++$+++ I restored Greene to the roster.  +++$+++ :I restored Greene to the roster. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 15:23, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

534710 +++$+++ Bibliomaniac15 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.180602960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. By the way, try not to bold your answers, they're an eyesore. ''''' +++$+++ Thanks. By the way, try not to bold your answers, they're an eyesore. '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="black">bibliomaniac</font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="red">1</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bibliomaniac15|<font color="blue">5</font>]]''''' 02:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
534711 +++$+++ Wikidan829 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534710 +++$+++ 534710 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.180606620E09 +++$+++ Good luck on your RfA!! You'll find that a few people can't make their own opinions and merely repeat what other people say, both good and bad(see how many times \"mature\" and variations thereof occur). Don't let it discourage you. You'll do fine.  +++$+++ :Good luck on your RfA!! You'll find that a few people can't make their own opinions and merely repeat what other people say, both good and bad(see how many times "mature" and variations thereof occur). Don't let it discourage you. You'll do fine. [[User:Wikidan829|Wikidan829]] 03:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
534712 +++$+++ Bibliomaniac15 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534710 +++$+++ 534711 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.180767960E09 +++$+++ Like most Wikipedia policy, RFA promotion tends to be vague standards. Most users reject the notion of percentage and instead rely on consensus to promote users. How crats measure this arbitrary consensus I don't know. It somehow relates to the Meta essay about polls being evil. Percentage is just around as a guideline, so far as I understand it. I think your RFA will turn to a borderline pass, since most rely on the 75% stated. '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color=\"black\">bibliomaniac<\/font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color=\"red\">1<\/font>]][[Special:Contributions\/Bibliomaniac15|<font color=\"blue\">5<\/font>]]''''' <small> +++$+++ ::Like most Wikipedia policy, RFA promotion tends to be vague standards. Most users reject the notion of percentage and instead rely on consensus to promote users. How crats measure this arbitrary consensus I don't know. It somehow relates to the Meta essay about polls being evil. Percentage is just around as a guideline, so far as I understand it. I think your RFA will turn to a borderline pass, since most rely on the 75% stated. '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="black">bibliomaniac</font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="red">1</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bibliomaniac15|<font color="blue">5</font>]]''''' <small>[[User:Bibliomaniac15/How many Wikipedians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?|An age old question...]]</small> 00:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
534713 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534710 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.180813500E09 +++$+++ How's it going? How are you holding up? I knew it was a harsh process, but, yeah, It's not pleasant having every edit you've made (ever) and then being judged against it. If I even make the strain of ''5'' more days then I'll start thinking about what next. Until then, if you want someone to talk to in the same basket, give me a bell. Cheers, a very tired  +++$+++ :::: How's it going? How are you holding up? I knew it was a harsh process, but, yeah, It's not pleasant having every edit you've made (ever) and then being judged against it. If I even make the strain of ''5'' more days then I'll start thinking about what next. Until then, if you want someone to talk to in the same basket, give me a bell. Cheers, a very tired [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 12:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
534714 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534710 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.180846260E09 +++$+++ It does help. Thanks mate, and some good luck yourself. Thiough I think I'm loosing it a bit, I just called you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:DoomsDay349&diff=135406739&oldid=135310748 meat].  Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::: It does help. Thanks mate, and some good luck yourself. Thiough I think I'm loosing it a bit, I just called you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoomsDay349&diff=135406739&oldid=135310748 meat].  Cheers, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 21:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

10423 +++$+++ Heymid +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10423 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-10 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.286759100E09 +++$+++ Hi, can you explain why you are impersonating my signature {{diff2|389913353|here}}? If you can't be creative, then use the standard signature. Also, it seems to me that you are signing manually (seems that you have never signed at Wikipedia). The UTC time you wrote is totally incorrect. To sign automatically, use <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>.  +++$+++ Hi, can you explain why you are impersonating my signature {{diff2|389913353|here}}? If you can't be creative, then use the standard signature. Also, it seems to me that you are signing manually (seems that you have never signed at Wikipedia). The UTC time you wrote is totally incorrect. To sign automatically, use <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. [[User:Heymid|<span style="color:green;">Hey</span>]][[User_talk:Heymid|<span style="color:red;">'''''Mid'''''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Heymid|contributions]]) 18:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
10424 +++$+++ Heymid +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10423 +++$+++ 10423 +++$+++ 2010-10-10 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.286759640E09 +++$+++ OK. But didn't you understand at first that such behavior is irritating? Also, I believe it's not nice to steal others' signatures, just because you didn't know how to sign automatically. At [[Special:Preferences]] you can design your own signature :).  +++$+++ :OK. But didn't you understand at first that such behavior is irritating? Also, I believe it's not nice to steal others' signatures, just because you didn't know how to sign automatically. At [[Special:Preferences]] you can design your own signature :). [[User:Heymid|<span style="color:green;">Hey</span>]][[User_talk:Heymid|<span style="color:red;">'''''Mid'''''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Heymid|contributions]]) 18:14, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

272568 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-01 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.154438820E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/manvsclown.cracked.com\/2006\/06\/its_hammer_time.php - ''blogger'']  +++$+++ [http://manvsclown.cracked.com/2006/06/its_hammer_time.php - ''blogger''] [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 06:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
272569 +++$+++ Matticus78 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272568 +++$+++ 272568 +++$+++ 2006-08-02 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.154541900E09 +++$+++ Is that how CSD A8 works? I've always been under the impression from the wording of it that it could only apply to a ''\"commercial content provider [...] directly engaged in making money off the content\"'' (e.g. something directly copied from Encarta, for example, or a news service selling their content to other providers) - in other words, there to get a potentially liable article off Wikipedia as quickly as possible - while something pulled from a free, publicly-accessible site that is simply promoting something went under the usual <nowiki>{{copyvio}}<\/nowiki> process. If I'm wrong about that, I'll know for future reference though. ~ +++$+++ :Is that how CSD A8 works? I've always been under the impression from the wording of it that it could only apply to a ''"commercial content provider [...] directly engaged in making money off the content"'' (e.g. something directly copied from Encarta, for example, or a news service selling their content to other providers) - in other words, there to get a potentially liable article off Wikipedia as quickly as possible - while something pulled from a free, publicly-accessible site that is simply promoting something went under the usual <nowiki>{{copyvio}}</nowiki> process. If I'm wrong about that, I'll know for future reference though. ~[[User:Matticus78|Matticus]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Matticus78|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Matticus78|C]]</sub> 11:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

10425 +++$+++ Tooga +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10425 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-17 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.287365820E09 +++$+++ About New Jersey's roster; Josefson was [[Djurg\xe5rdens IF Hockey|Djurg\xe5rden]]'s player during the 2009-10 season, he did not belong to New Jersey. He signed a contract with New Jersey on May 14, 2010 and was therefore acquired by the club, but not before May 14, 2010. Cheers  +++$+++ About New Jersey's roster; Josefson was [[Djurgårdens IF Hockey|Djurgården]]'s player during the 2009-10 season, he did not belong to New Jersey. He signed a contract with New Jersey on May 14, 2010 and was therefore acquired by the club, but not before May 14, 2010. Cheers [[User:Tooga|Tooga]] - <small>[[User talk:Tooga|BØRK!]]</small> 18:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
10426 +++$+++ Tooga +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10425 +++$+++ 10425 +++$+++ 2010-10-19 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.287540000E09 +++$+++ Hi again. Could you please explain to me why you think Josefson was acquired by NJD in 2009 without having signed any contract with the club? Cheers  +++$+++ :Hi again. Could you please explain to me why you think Josefson was acquired by NJD in 2009 without having signed any contract with the club? Cheers [[User:Tooga|Tooga]] - <small>[[User talk:Tooga|BØRK!]]</small> 19:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

10427 +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-19 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.287540780E09 +++$+++ He was drafted by New Jersey in the 2009 NHL player draft.  +++$+++ He was drafted by New Jersey in the 2009 NHL player draft. [[User:Doh286|Doh286]] ([[User talk:Doh286#top|talk]]) 19:13, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
10428 +++$+++ Tooga +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10427 +++$+++ 10427 +++$+++ 2010-10-19 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.287543060E09 +++$+++ Yes, but how does that mean that he was acquired by NJD? He still had a contract with Djurg\xe5rden at the time. He first signed with NJD in 2010, so I don't understand your reasoning. Cheers  +++$+++ :Yes, but how does that mean that he was acquired by NJD? He still had a contract with Djurgården at the time. He first signed with NJD in 2010, so I don't understand your reasoning. Cheers [[User:Tooga|Tooga]] - <small>[[User talk:Tooga|BØRK!]]</small> 19:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
10429 +++$+++ Tooga +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10427 +++$+++ 10427 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.287632280E09 +++$+++ Hello again. Please, explain to me why the draft matters when he didn't sign anything until May 14, 2010? It would be like saying that Tedenby was acquired in 2008 when he actually played with HV71 for two more seasons, and didn't join NJD until May 14, 2010. Cheers  +++$+++ :Hello again. Please, explain to me why the draft matters when he didn't sign anything until May 14, 2010? It would be like saying that Tedenby was acquired in 2008 when he actually played with HV71 for two more seasons, and didn't join NJD until May 14, 2010. Cheers [[User:Tooga|Tooga]] - <small>[[User talk:Tooga|BØRK!]]</small> 20:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
10430 +++$+++ Shootmaster 44 +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10427 +++$+++ 10429 +++$+++ 2010-10-23 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.287903360E09 +++$+++ Just an FYI Tooga, [[WP:Hockey]] considered the acquired box to be when the NHL club acquired his rights. Therefore, if Josefson was drafted in the 2009 Entry Draft, the Devils acquired him in 2009. The fact he was still playing for Djurgardens is inconsequential, as he was then a Devils prospect. Unfortunately, for European hockey fans, [[WP:Hockey]] considers the NHL to be the top league in the world. Thus, when the Devils draft a player, regardless of when he signs a contract he is considered Devils' property as of the draft. Playing in Europe simply means that he is a prospect for that team. Most [[Canadian Hockey League|CHL]] players don't sign contracts for nearly a year after they are drafted. Most [[National Collegiate Athletic Association|NCAA]] don't sign for 4 years after they are drafted. This doesn't mean that the player is any less of a NHL prospect simply because he is unsigned.  +++$+++ ::Just an FYI Tooga, [[WP:Hockey]] considered the acquired box to be when the NHL club acquired his rights. Therefore, if Josefson was drafted in the 2009 Entry Draft, the Devils acquired him in 2009. The fact he was still playing for Djurgardens is inconsequential, as he was then a Devils prospect. Unfortunately, for European hockey fans, [[WP:Hockey]] considers the NHL to be the top league in the world. Thus, when the Devils draft a player, regardless of when he signs a contract he is considered Devils' property as of the draft. Playing in Europe simply means that he is a prospect for that team. Most [[Canadian Hockey League|CHL]] players don't sign contracts for nearly a year after they are drafted. Most [[National Collegiate Athletic Association|NCAA]] don't sign for 4 years after they are drafted. This doesn't mean that the player is any less of a NHL prospect simply because he is unsigned. [[User:Shootmaster 44|Shootmaster 44]] ([[User talk:Shootmaster 44|talk]]) 23:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
10431 +++$+++ Tooga +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10427 +++$+++ 10430 +++$+++ 2010-10-24 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.287943920E09 +++$+++ Wow, that's screwed up. Cheers  +++$+++ :::Wow, that's screwed up. Cheers [[User:Tooga|Tooga]] - <small>[[User talk:Tooga|BØRK!]]</small> 11:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
10432 +++$+++ Raul17 +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10427 +++$+++ 10431 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.288077900E09 +++$+++ No, it is just like the NHL drafts players from juniors: kid gets drafted in 2008, does not sign a contract until 2009 and does not play in NHL until 2011; still listed as 2008. Think it as being named to a team's reserve or protected list: no other NHL team claim\/sign him until he is released from that team's list +++$+++ ::::No, it is just like the NHL drafts players from juniors: kid gets drafted in 2008, does not sign a contract until 2009 and does not play in NHL until 2011; still listed as 2008. Think it as being named to a team's reserve or protected list: no other NHL team claim/sign him until he is released from that team's list[[User:Raul17|Raul17]] ([[User talk:Raul17|talk]]) 00:25, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

394954 +++$+++ MarmadukePercy +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 394954 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-16 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.266382560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know about the cats. Regards,  +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know about the cats. Regards, [[User:MarmadukePercy|MarmadukePercy]] ([[User talk:MarmadukePercy|talk]]) 20:56, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
394955 +++$+++ MarmadukePercy +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 394954 +++$+++ 394954 +++$+++ 2010-02-16 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.266384240E09 +++$+++ Always a pleasure on here finding good folks. You are most welcome. Best,  +++$+++ :Always a pleasure on here finding good folks. You are most welcome. Best, [[User:MarmadukePercy|MarmadukePercy]] ([[User talk:MarmadukePercy|talk]]) 21:24, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
394956 +++$+++ MarmadukePercy +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 394954 +++$+++ 394955 +++$+++ 2010-03-04 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.267753620E09 +++$+++ I will fix that. I was in a hurry. The article has survived largely intact since it ran as a DYK, and in my estimation your edits, while well-meaning, were not an improvement in the text.  +++$+++ ::I will fix that. I was in a hurry. The article has survived largely intact since it ran as a DYK, and in my estimation your edits, while well-meaning, were not an improvement in the text. [[User:MarmadukePercy|MarmadukePercy]] ([[User talk:MarmadukePercy|talk]]) 17:47, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

272575 +++$+++ WAS 4.250 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-04 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.154753160E09 +++$+++ I want to encourage you to continue and finish your [[User:Sarah Ewart\/drafts|Sarah Ewart's draft]] so that it can replace my version. Your version is much better written.  +++$+++ I want to encourage you to continue and finish your [[User:Sarah Ewart/drafts|Sarah Ewart's draft]] so that it can replace my version. Your version is much better written. [[User:WAS 4.250|WAS 4.250]] 21:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
272576 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272575 +++$+++ 272575 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 10:12:00 +++$+++ 1.154797920E09 +++$+++ I have blocked [[User:65.8.3.68|65.8.3.68]] for 48 hours for stating personal information, and warned him about making personal attacks as above.  +++$+++ :I have blocked [[User:65.8.3.68|65.8.3.68]] for 48 hours for stating personal information, and warned him about making personal attacks as above. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 10:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

272578 +++$+++ Bhadani +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-05 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.154814180E09 +++$+++ Hello Sarah. I thank you for your message. I do not believe that he has left \u2013 for various reasons he may not have edited for last two or three days. I know that true wikipedians do not desert the ship, and as a true wikipedian, Ambuj should again become active very shortly. Regards.  -- +++$+++ Hello Sarah. I thank you for your message. I do not believe that he has left – for various reasons he may not have edited for last two or three days. I know that true wikipedians do not desert the ship, and as a true wikipedian, Ambuj should again become active very shortly. Regards.  --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] 14:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
272579 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272578 +++$+++ 272578 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.154815800E09 +++$+++ Sorry to butt in, but it says on his user page he will be back on the 7th. -- +++$+++ :Sorry to butt in, but it says on his user page he will be back on the 7th. --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 15:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

272583 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-06 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.154873280E09 +++$+++ Hey Sarah, How fantastic you are: saving it from Deletion ;) Good on ya' ;). On a '''completly''' unrelated note *-): I made ''my'' first article today: [[DECv]]. Let me know what you think :) --[[User:Deon555|Deon555]]| +++$+++ Hey Sarah, How fantastic you are: saving it from Deletion ;) Good on ya' ;). On a '''completly''' unrelated note *-): I made ''my'' first article today: [[DECv]]. Let me know what you think :) --[[User:Deon555|Deon555]]|[[User:Deon555/Contact|talk]]|<font color="green">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]</font>|<small>[[WP:ER#User:Deon555|Review Me! :D]]</small> 07:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
272584 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272583 +++$+++ 272583 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.154876340E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, Thanks for the fix's and comments. I had a look at [[WP:MELB]] earlier today and did a tiny bit of work (addresses et al) on the County Court article. --[[User:Deon555|Deon555]]| +++$+++ :Hi Sarah, Thanks for the fix's and comments. I had a look at [[WP:MELB]] earlier today and did a tiny bit of work (addresses et al) on the County Court article. --[[User:Deon555|Deon555]]|[[User:Deon555/Contact|talk]]|<font color="green">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]</font>|<small>[[WP:ER#User:Deon555|Review Me! :D]]</small> 07:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

272585 +++$+++ Funky Monkey +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-06 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.154900340E09 +++$+++ for an administrator?  I think you'll make a great job of it. -- +++$+++ for an administrator?  I think you'll make a great job of it. --[[User:Funky Monkey|<font style="background: #CC9900" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;Funky Monkey&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:Funky Monkey|<font style="background:#CD00CD" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]] 14:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
272586 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272585 +++$+++ 272585 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.154902020E09 +++$+++ I would happily second that. -- +++$+++ :I would happily second that. --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 15:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
272587 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272585 +++$+++ 272586 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.154938920E09 +++$+++ Strong Third--[[User:Deon555|Deon555]]| +++$+++ ::Strong Third--[[User:Deon555|Deon555]]|[[User:Deon555/Contact|talk]]|<font color="green">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]</font>|<small>[[WP:ER#User:Deon555|Review Me! :D]]</small> 01:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

272588 +++$+++ Doctorbruno +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272588 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-06 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.154902560E09 +++$+++ I invite your attention to http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/WP:AUTO#If_Wikipedia_already_has_an_article_about_you I did not write this article in the first place. I am forced to edit here to avoid my name being slandered. Hope you look into the matter deeply.  +++$+++ I invite your attention to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:AUTO#If_Wikipedia_already_has_an_article_about_you I did not write this article in the first place. I am forced to edit here to avoid my name being slandered. Hope you look into the matter deeply. [[User:Doctorbruno|Doctor Bruno]] 15:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
272589 +++$+++ Doctorbruno +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272588 +++$+++ 272588 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.154937540E09 +++$+++ The problem is not with the article. I am pointing out to you that it is few guys who do not like me in real world who are misguiding wikipedia +++$+++ : The problem is not with the article. I am pointing out to you that it is few guys who do not like me in real world who are misguiding wikipedia[[User:Doctorbruno|Doctor Bruno]] 00:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
272590 +++$+++ Doctorbruno +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272588 +++$+++ 272589 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.154938620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply. Not Samir. He has been misguided by a user called EyeMD (who hates me in real world). Please see Samir's talk Page. This EyeMD is responsible for this. EyeMD seems to be hating me in the real world and is spreading worng information about me. First EyeMD said that there are no books like that. When I dared him to contact the publisher and verify, he has changed the stand. I request you to kindly go into all the details and then cast your opinion. What is the definition of Cram Books. And even ifyou say cram books are different, where is the Wikipedia guideline that says Exam Cram books are NOT books. Even if so, there are less notable biographies with less known books. WHy is User EyeMD not deleting then, but is going around all user talk discussions and asking my biography to be deleted. I have proved as to why the biography satisfies Wikipedia Criteria. THen EyeMD has changed the reason to vanity. Any one can see that I am involved in the article for the past 3 days only. How will it amount to vanity. Now few guys are going around the net and spreading wrong information about me  +++$+++ :: Thanks for your reply. Not Samir. He has been misguided by a user called EyeMD (who hates me in real world). Please see Samir's talk Page. This EyeMD is responsible for this. EyeMD seems to be hating me in the real world and is spreading worng information about me. First EyeMD said that there are no books like that. When I dared him to contact the publisher and verify, he has changed the stand. I request you to kindly go into all the details and then cast your opinion. What is the definition of Cram Books. And even ifyou say cram books are different, where is the Wikipedia guideline that says Exam Cram books are NOT books. Even if so, there are less notable biographies with less known books. WHy is User EyeMD not deleting then, but is going around all user talk discussions and asking my biography to be deleted. I have proved as to why the biography satisfies Wikipedia Criteria. THen EyeMD has changed the reason to vanity. Any one can see that I am involved in the article for the past 3 days only. How will it amount to vanity. Now few guys are going around the net and spreading wrong information about me [[User:Doctorbruno|Doctor Bruno]] 01:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

10445 +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-16 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.292551380E09 +++$+++ Both players signed PTO'S with Lake Erie.  +++$+++ Both players signed PTO'S with Lake Erie. [[User:Doh286|Doh286]] ([[User talk:Doh286#top|talk]]) 18:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
10446 +++$+++ Weatherman05071 +++$+++ Doh286 +++$+++ 10445 +++$+++ 10445 +++$+++ 2010-12-16 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.292562420E09 +++$+++ You are partially incorrect here is proof that I indeed had the right information. http:\/\/www.echl.com\/echl-transactions-dec-14-p168136  +++$+++ :You are partially incorrect here is proof that I indeed had the right information. http://www.echl.com/echl-transactions-dec-14-p168136 [[User:Weatherman05071|Weatherman05071]] ([[User talk:Weatherman05071|talk]]) 21:07, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

272592 +++$+++ Seektrue +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-06 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.154917080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Seektrue|Seektrue]] 19:18, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
272593 +++$+++ Kurt Shaped Box +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272592 +++$+++ 272592 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.154923800E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Sarah. I'm a bit flummoxed as to what can actually be done in this situation. It's pretty clear to me now that he's editing in bad faith but it seems that he's now being careful (following his previous IP and username ban) not to revert often enough to fall foul of the 3RR, or frequently enough to be blocked for simple vandalism. -- +++$+++ :Thanks, Sarah. I'm a bit flummoxed as to what can actually be done in this situation. It's pretty clear to me now that he's editing in bad faith but it seems that he's now being careful (following his previous IP and username ban) not to revert often enough to fall foul of the 3RR, or frequently enough to be blocked for simple vandalism. --[[User:Kurt Shaped Box|Kurt Shaped Box]] 21:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

10449 +++$+++ Toya +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10449 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-20 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.127265960E09 +++$+++ \u05d0\u05e0\u05d9 \u05e4\u05d5\u05e8\u05e9 \u05de\u05d5\u05d5\u05d9\u05e7\u05d9\u05e4\u05d3\u05d9\u05d4 \u05d4\u05d0\u05e0\u05d2\u05dc\u05d9\u05ea.  +++$+++ אני פורש מוויקיפדיה האנגלית. [[User:Toya|Toya]] 18:26, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
10450 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10449 +++$+++ 10449 +++$+++ 2005-09-20 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.127269980E09 +++$+++ You could tell them this yourself.  +++$+++ : You could tell them this yourself. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 19:33, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

10451 +++$+++ Ramallite +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10451 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-11 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.129067700E09 +++$+++ Hi MathKnight, I have noticed that you have edited in the past regarding Israeli casualties during the conflict. I have an edit conflict with [[User:Zeq]] regarding the [[Israeli West Bank barrier]] where he is insisting that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Israeli_West_Bank_barrier&oldid=25222179 my] version is not NPOV and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Israeli_West_Bank_barrier&oldid=25221003 his] version is. I think the two are very similar, but he has a lot of redundancy, bad English, deletion of phrases that balance things out or put things in context, and has an agenda against the Palestinian Negotiations Affairs Department which has published the Palestinian official response to the barrier. The only problem with my version is the section on the effects of the barrier on Israeli security. Could you possible take a look at the article - preferably my version :) - and add to that section? I do not have enough statistics to have a coherent section on the reduction of Israeli casualties, and that section is much shorter than the \"Effects on Palestinians\" section. If you have the desire or the time to take a look, that would be great. It would also be nice to have your take on comparing the two versions, most other editors seem to have left it to me to tackle [[User:Zeq]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ Hi MathKnight, I have noticed that you have edited in the past regarding Israeli casualties during the conflict. I have an edit conflict with [[User:Zeq]] regarding the [[Israeli West Bank barrier]] where he is insisting that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israeli_West_Bank_barrier&oldid=25222179 my] version is not NPOV and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israeli_West_Bank_barrier&oldid=25221003 his] version is. I think the two are very similar, but he has a lot of redundancy, bad English, deletion of phrases that balance things out or put things in context, and has an agenda against the Palestinian Negotiations Affairs Department which has published the Palestinian official response to the barrier. The only problem with my version is the section on the effects of the barrier on Israeli security. Could you possible take a look at the article - preferably my version :) - and add to that section? I do not have enough statistics to have a coherent section on the reduction of Israeli casualties, and that section is much shorter than the "Effects on Palestinians" section. If you have the desire or the time to take a look, that would be great. It would also be nice to have your take on comparing the two versions, most other editors seem to have left it to me to tackle [[User:Zeq]]. Thank you. [[User:Ramallite|Ramallite]] <sup><small><font color="DarkBlue">[[User_talk:Ramallite|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 14:55, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
10452 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10451 +++$+++ 10451 +++$+++ 2005-10-12 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.129168860E09 +++$+++ The current version is far too different then your old one. I suggest you work your changes from there. Try to use the TalkPage to explain your changes. Since I seldom visit here recently (I far too much work in the domestic), I can't much of an help here.  +++$+++ : The current version is far too different then your old one. I suggest you work your changes from there. Try to use the TalkPage to explain your changes. Since I seldom visit here recently (I far too much work in the domestic), I can't much of an help here. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 19:01, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

10453 +++$+++ Zeq +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10453 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-01 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.130904480E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship\/Ramallite  +++$+++ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Ramallite [[User:Zeq|Zeq]] 20:08, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
10454 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10453 +++$+++ 10453 +++$+++ 2005-12-05 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.133830980E09 +++$+++ I have already corrected this at English. I guess I forgot to this in Hebrew. Thanks for the notice.  +++$+++ : I have already corrected this at English. I guess I forgot to this in Hebrew. Thanks for the notice. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 17:03, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

45433 +++$+++ Shawn in Montreal +++$+++ Mariordo +++$+++ 45433 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-30 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.296448380E09 +++$+++ Hi, as I state in my edit summaries, please do feel free to restore anything from Diamondland that you deem useful. Also, he has a particular interest in one of your areas, green transport, and so if someone shows up shortly making similar edits, including oddly named categories, a multitude of redirects, overpopulation of See also, spam links to corporate news, copyvio or close paraphrasing, and a poor command of English (he's Spanish), please do let me know, if you wish. regards,  +++$+++ Hi, as I state in my edit summaries, please do feel free to restore anything from Diamondland that you deem useful. Also, he has a particular interest in one of your areas, green transport, and so if someone shows up shortly making similar edits, including oddly named categories, a multitude of redirects, overpopulation of See also, spam links to corporate news, copyvio or close paraphrasing, and a poor command of English (he's Spanish), please do let me know, if you wish. regards, [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 20:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
45434 +++$+++ Shawn in Montreal +++$+++ Mariordo +++$+++ 45433 +++$+++ 45433 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.296451200E09 +++$+++ Incredibly, I just become aware of the allegation, baseless imo, that ''you'' are Mac. That can't be pleasant. I've weighed in at the SPI. best regards,  +++$+++ *Incredibly, I just become aware of the allegation, baseless imo, that ''you'' are Mac. That can't be pleasant. I've weighed in at the SPI. best regards, [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 21:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

10456 +++$+++ El C +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10456 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-27 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.135684560E09 +++$+++ Nice work with [[:he:\u05d0\u05d5\u05e1\u05e6\u05d9\u05dc\u05d8\u05d5\u05e8 \u05d4\u05e8\u05de\u05d5\u05e0\u05d9 \u05e7\u05d5\u05d5\u05e0\u05d8\u05d9|\u05d0\u05d5\u05e1\u05e6\u05d9\u05dc\u05d8\u05d5\u05e8 \u05d4\u05e8\u05de\u05d5\u05e0\u05d9 \u05e7\u05d5\u05d5\u05e0\u05d8\u05d9]]. Regards,  +++$+++ Nice work with [[:he:אוסצילטור הרמוני קוונטי|אוסצילטור הרמוני קוונטי]]. Regards, [[User:El C|El_C]] 03:56, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
10457 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10456 +++$+++ 10456 +++$+++ 2005-12-27 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.135735020E09 +++$+++ Thank you. To be honest, I must note I based heavily on the English article, translate most of it and added explaination where I deemed neccesary.  +++$+++ : Thank you. To be honest, I must note I based heavily on the English article, translate most of it and added explaination where I deemed neccesary. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 17:57, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

272601 +++$+++ 72.139.185.19 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-08 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.155043980E09 +++$+++ You recently made an edit the [[Michael Ignatieff]] page; could you please step in again to put an end to the current edit war? I made a personal attack against a user over his edits (bad, I know), and he's taking it out on the article.  +++$+++ You recently made an edit the [[Michael Ignatieff]] page; could you please step in again to put an end to the current edit war? I made a personal attack against a user over his edits (bad, I know), and he's taking it out on the article. [[User:72.139.185.19|72.139.185.19]] 06:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
272602 +++$+++ 72.139.185.19 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272601 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.155045780E09 +++$+++ Maybe you should consider a user name change? To, say, \"Sarah 'The Hammer' Ewart\"?  +++$+++ ::Maybe you should consider a user name change? To, say, "Sarah 'The Hammer' Ewart"? [[User:72.139.185.19|72.139.185.19]] 07:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
272603 +++$+++ 72.139.185.19 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272601 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.155071280E09 +++$+++ Not as much as I'd like. Mostly, I stick to WP. But \"The Hammer\" is truly awesome. I particularly love that he'd never even tried a case in NY. Anyway, I added a video link to the discussion page of your new draft, in case you'd like to link to the outgoing pages in the final version. His bio just isn't the same unless you've heard him firsthand!  +++$+++ :::Not as much as I'd like. Mostly, I stick to WP. But "The Hammer" is truly awesome. I particularly love that he'd never even tried a case in NY. Anyway, I added a video link to the discussion page of your new draft, in case you'd like to link to the outgoing pages in the final version. His bio just isn't the same unless you've heard him firsthand! [[User:72.139.185.19|72.139.185.19]] 14:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

10458 +++$+++ Altmany +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10458 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-21 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.137893700E09 +++$+++ Hello MathKnight. I uploaded your images from [[he:\u05e4\u05d9\u05d2\u05d5\u05e2 \u05db\u05d1\u05d9\u05e9 \u05d4\u05d7\u05d5\u05e3]] to [[Coastal Road massacre]]. Please modify the image licensing to clear any doubts, because apparently there is some question about it (see [[User_talk:Altmany#Image:1978-bus-attack01.jpg_listed_for_deletion]]). Apparently, you're not allowed to restrict your license to free educational websites. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hello MathKnight. I uploaded your images from [[he:פיגוע כביש החוף]] to [[Coastal Road massacre]]. Please modify the image licensing to clear any doubts, because apparently there is some question about it (see [[User_talk:Altmany#Image:1978-bus-attack01.jpg_listed_for_deletion]]). Apparently, you're not allowed to restrict your license to free educational websites. Thanks. [[User:Altmany|altmany]] 17:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
10459 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10458 +++$+++ 10458 +++$+++ 2006-01-21 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.137899340E09 +++$+++ I answered you on the [[User_talk:Altmany#Image:1978-bus-attack01.jpg_listed_for_deletion|talk page]]. If it is any good, I give explicit premission to use them on Wikipedia and noted so on their description pages.  +++$+++ : I answered you on the [[User_talk:Altmany#Image:1978-bus-attack01.jpg_listed_for_deletion|talk page]]. If it is any good, I give explicit premission to use them on Wikipedia and noted so on their description pages. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 19:09, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
10460 +++$+++ Altmany +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10458 +++$+++ 10459 +++$+++ 2006-01-22 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.137946320E09 +++$+++ Please see NV's answer in my [[User_talk:Altmany#Image:1978-bus-attack01.jpg_listed_for_deletion|talk page]] about the specific copyright to use.  +++$+++ ::Please see NV's answer in my [[User_talk:Altmany#Image:1978-bus-attack01.jpg_listed_for_deletion|talk page]] about the specific copyright to use. [[User:Altmany|altmany]] 08:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

10461 +++$+++ Cohesion +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-22 07:17:00 +++$+++ 1.137943020E09 +++$+++ Hello, the image [[:Image:Longbus01.jpg]] says you created it, if that's true, can you take a look at it and see what sort of license you want to give it? If you need any help picking one ([[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]]) or something just leave me a message :D -  +++$+++ Hello, the image [[:Image:Longbus01.jpg]] says you created it, if that's true, can you take a look at it and see what sort of license you want to give it? If you need any help picking one ([[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]]) or something just leave me a message :D - [[User:Cohesion|cohesion]]<font color="#cc0033">&#9733;</font>[[User_talk:Cohesion|talk]] 07:17, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
10462 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10461 +++$+++ 10461 +++$+++ 2006-01-22 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.137999900E09 +++$+++ The license is fine, as long I'm attributed and credited for the picture.  +++$+++ : The license is fine, as long I'm attributed and credited for the picture. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 23:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

272607 +++$+++ JPD +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272607 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.155245160E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. As discussed at [[WP:AN\/I#Spelling war]], Peterpansyndrome, Peterenko, etc. seem to be Pnatt, who was previously banned for spelling wars and things like that.  +++$+++ Hi Sarah. As discussed at [[WP:AN/I#Spelling war]], Peterpansyndrome, Peterenko, etc. seem to be Pnatt, who was previously banned for spelling wars and things like that. [[User:JPD|JPD]] ([[User talk:JPD|talk]]) 14:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
272608 +++$+++ JPD +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272607 +++$+++ 272607 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.155247380E09 +++$+++ I don't think there's anythign to add - I just hope and admin gets round to blocking him soon. I had half an idea that you were an admin, but I guess we have to wait.  +++$+++ :I don't think there's anythign to add - I just hope and admin gets round to blocking him soon. I had half an idea that you were an admin, but I guess we have to wait. [[User:JPD|JPD]] ([[User talk:JPD|talk]]) 15:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

10464 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-31 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.138766880E09 +++$+++ Are you the MathKnight who uploaded [http:\/\/he.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%D7%AA%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94:F-15i_6.jpg this image] into Hebrew Wikipedia? If so, could you please translate the source and copyright information into [[:Image:F-15I.jpg|this copy of the image]] that I copied into English Wikipedia? Thanks,  +++$+++ Are you the MathKnight who uploaded [http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%AA%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%94:F-15i_6.jpg this image] into Hebrew Wikipedia? If so, could you please translate the source and copyright information into [[:Image:F-15I.jpg|this copy of the image]] that I copied into English Wikipedia? Thanks, [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 20:08, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
10465 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10464 +++$+++ 10464 +++$+++ 2006-01-31 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.138768560E09 +++$+++ This image was contributed to the Hebrew Wikipedia by an Israeli website called http:\/\/www.israeli-weapons.com\/ . The license and usage conditions were not much detailed but they did asked credit for the usage.  +++$+++ : This image was contributed to the Hebrew Wikipedia by an Israeli website called http://www.israeli-weapons.com/ . The license and usage conditions were not much detailed but they did asked credit for the usage. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 20:36, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
10466 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10464 +++$+++ 10465 +++$+++ 2006-01-31 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.138775100E09 +++$+++ Could you please place the correct copyright tab on [[:Image:F-15I.jpg]]?  +++$+++ ::Could you please place the correct copyright tab on [[:Image:F-15I.jpg]]? [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 22:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
10467 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10464 +++$+++ 10466 +++$+++ 2006-02-01 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.138851240E09 +++$+++ I am not an expert for copyrights and a specially not to all the new image tags that sprunge on the EnWiki like mushrums after rain.  +++$+++ ::: I am not an expert for copyrights and a specially not to all the new image tags that sprunge on the EnWiki like mushrums after rain. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 19:34, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
10468 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10464 +++$+++ 10467 +++$+++ 2006-02-01 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.138851780E09 +++$+++ Nice analogy ;-), what are the exact 'license and usage conditions'? I don't see any information about copyright status on http:\/\/www.israeli-weapons.com\/  +++$+++ ::::Nice analogy ;-), what are the exact 'license and usage conditions'? I don't see any information about copyright status on http://www.israeli-weapons.com/ [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 19:43, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

534753 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-15 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.221466380E09 +++$+++ Hey, if you don't mind please but just to wait till after the ppv to place the table in because the IPS hate the thing and I do not want to bother with them at the moment.-- +++$+++ Hey, if you don't mind please but just to wait till after the ppv to place the table in because the IPS hate the thing and I do not want to bother with them at the moment.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 01:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
534754 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534753 +++$+++ 534753 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.221467100E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about it man, for you to know I'm really the only one that watches the article. If it wasn't for me that article wouldn't even exist because no one wants to expand the TNA ppvs. IPs just annoy me because they keep removing stuff and are pissed half the time so I would rather not deal with them removing the table all the time. That is why I'm going to expand TNA's main ppv Bound for Glory in a sandbox so I don't deal with them.-- +++$+++ :Don't worry about it man, for you to know I'm really the only one that watches the article. If it wasn't for me that article wouldn't even exist because no one wants to expand the TNA ppvs. IPs just annoy me because they keep removing stuff and are pissed half the time so I would rather not deal with them removing the table all the time. That is why I'm going to expand TNA's main ppv Bound for Glory in a sandbox so I don't deal with them.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 01:25, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
534755 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534753 +++$+++ 534754 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.221467880E09 +++$+++ Yeah sure that would be great however I believe it wouldn't work out. Since I plan on making BFG a FA so I'm going to go at it a totally different way and I'm hard to work with on stuff. But while I have you here, could you read [[Slammiversary (2008)]] in my [[User:Wrestlinglover\/Slammiversary (2008)|Sandbox]]. I'm almost done with it but I would like to know how the background sounds so far.-- +++$+++ ::Yeah sure that would be great however I believe it wouldn't work out. Since I plan on making BFG a FA so I'm going to go at it a totally different way and I'm hard to work with on stuff. But while I have you here, could you read [[Slammiversary (2008)]] in my [[User:Wrestlinglover/Slammiversary (2008)|Sandbox]]. I'm almost done with it but I would like to know how the background sounds so far.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 01:38, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
534756 +++$+++ Wrestlinglover +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534753 +++$+++ 534755 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.221469200E09 +++$+++ Okay, I was just wondering because I haven't worked on it in a few days and I just started on the event last night. I'm behind schedule on it. I just wanted to make sure I'm getting somewhere since I quit and put more focus on [[Hard Justice (2008)|Hard Justice]] than it.-- +++$+++ :::Okay, I was just wondering because I haven't worked on it in a few days and I just started on the event last night. I'm behind schedule on it. I just wanted to make sure I'm getting somewhere since I quit and put more focus on [[Hard Justice (2008)|Hard Justice]] than it.--[[User:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Red">'''Will'''</font>]][[User talk:Wrestlinglover|<font color="Blue">'''C'''</font>]] 02:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

272611 +++$+++ Musical Linguist +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-13 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.155477540E09 +++$+++ Hi, Sarah. Since you recently got (slightly) involved in the case of Giovanni and his puppets, I thought I would direct you to [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Giovanni33_once_again|new discussion]], in case you have missed it. Jayjg has now '''confirmed''' through checkuser that [[User:Professor33|Professor33]], [[User:NeoOne|NeoOne]], and [[User:CleanSocks|CleanSocks]] are all sockpuppets of Giovanni33.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=69087027&oldid=69086486] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Musical_Linguist&diff=69087631&oldid=69065700] Giovanni has now come as close as I think he ''can'' come (without losing face) to admitting sockpuppetry. He has agreed [[User_talk:Giovanni33#Block_extended_to_one_month|here]] that it doesn't pay, and has asked to be unblocked on certain conditions which, if enforced, would make the use of sockpuppets completely futile. I've made a proposal [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Giovanni_Part_Three|here]], at the Incidents Noticeboard. Also, [[User_talk:Danny#Resolution_Sought|this section]] of Danny's talk page gives a summary of this history and contains links to all or nearly all the places where it has been discussed. The blocking admin has indicated that he will consider unblocking early, and I'd be happy with that, but I think we need to work out the conditions that Giovanni agrees to first. Assuming that the sockpuppetry stops, I'd also be happy with removing the puppeteer tag from his own user page, in order to help him to make a clean start, free from any unnecessary humiliation. Don't feel you have to get involved, but if you have time, a comment at the noticeboard would be welcome. I'm hoping to have this sorted out as soon as possible, because I need to go on wiki-break to finish some writing. Cheers.  +++$+++ Hi, Sarah. Since you recently got (slightly) involved in the case of Giovanni and his puppets, I thought I would direct you to [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Giovanni33_once_again|new discussion]], in case you have missed it. Jayjg has now '''confirmed''' through checkuser that [[User:Professor33|Professor33]], [[User:NeoOne|NeoOne]], and [[User:CleanSocks|CleanSocks]] are all sockpuppets of Giovanni33.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=69087027&oldid=69086486] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Musical_Linguist&diff=69087631&oldid=69065700] Giovanni has now come as close as I think he ''can'' come (without losing face) to admitting sockpuppetry. He has agreed [[User_talk:Giovanni33#Block_extended_to_one_month|here]] that it doesn't pay, and has asked to be unblocked on certain conditions which, if enforced, would make the use of sockpuppets completely futile. I've made a proposal [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Giovanni_Part_Three|here]], at the Incidents Noticeboard. Also, [[User_talk:Danny#Resolution_Sought|this section]] of Danny's talk page gives a summary of this history and contains links to all or nearly all the places where it has been discussed. The blocking admin has indicated that he will consider unblocking early, and I'd be happy with that, but I think we need to work out the conditions that Giovanni agrees to first. Assuming that the sockpuppetry stops, I'd also be happy with removing the puppeteer tag from his own user page, in order to help him to make a clean start, free from any unnecessary humiliation. Don't feel you have to get involved, but if you have time, a comment at the noticeboard would be welcome. I'm hoping to have this sorted out as soon as possible, because I need to go on wiki-break to finish some writing. Cheers. [[User:Musical Linguist|AnnH]] [[User talk:Musical Linguist|<b><font size="3">♫</font></b>]] 06:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
272612 +++$+++ Musical Linguist +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272611 +++$+++ 272611 +++$+++ 2006-08-13 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.155492960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments, Sarah. I knew you weren't an admin, though I'm sure you'd sail through an RfA. (I remember being impressed at the time with your calm message to Count Of The Saxon Shore at the time that he was trying to nominate Robsteadman's user page for deletion.) In the meantime, don't forget that the \"lesser mortals\" are always welcome to join discussion at admin noticeboards. In fact, it's one of the things that gets potential admins \"known\" by the community. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your comments, Sarah. I knew you weren't an admin, though I'm sure you'd sail through an RfA. (I remember being impressed at the time with your calm message to Count Of The Saxon Shore at the time that he was trying to nominate Robsteadman's user page for deletion.) In the meantime, don't forget that the "lesser mortals" are always welcome to join discussion at admin noticeboards. In fact, it's one of the things that gets potential admins "known" by the community. Cheers. [[User:Musical Linguist|AnnH]] [[User talk:Musical Linguist|<b><font size="3">♫</font></b>]] 11:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

10469 +++$+++ Rickjpelleg +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10469 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-31 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.138769160E09 +++$+++ TIA,  +++$+++ TIA, [[User:Rickjpelleg|RickP]] 20:46, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
10470 +++$+++ Rickjpelleg +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10469 +++$+++ 10469 +++$+++ 2006-02-03 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.139033280E09 +++$+++ Moved, and disambig created for [[roller-compactor]].  +++$+++ :Moved, and disambig created for [[roller-compactor]]. [[User:Rickjpelleg|RickP]] 22:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

272614 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-14 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.155548520E09 +++$+++ Won't Pnatt ever stop vandalizing this place?  Good work keeping up with him and reporting him to [[WP:AIV]]! \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ Won't Pnatt ever stop vandalizing this place?  Good work keeping up with him and reporting him to [[WP:AIV]]! —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 02:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
272615 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272614 +++$+++ 272614 +++$+++ 2006-08-14 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.155548700E09 +++$+++ I know! I'm hoping he gets bored with it very soon. Thanks for blocking him so quickly. Last time he did this it took ages to get him blocked. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I know! I'm hoping he gets bored with it very soon. Thanks for blocking him so quickly. Last time he did this it took ages to get him blocked. Cheers, [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 02:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
272616 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272614 +++$+++ 272615 +++$+++ 2006-08-14 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.155548760E09 +++$+++ No problem!  It's fun; I just became an admin last night. \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ ::No problem!  It's fun; I just became an admin last night. —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 02:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
272617 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272614 +++$+++ 272614 +++$+++ 2006-08-14 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.155549120E09 +++$+++ I just semi-protected [[Australia]] and [[Macquarie Dictionary]] now to hopefully stop this vandalism.  I can't believe I didn't think of that sooner. \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ :I just semi-protected [[Australia]] and [[Macquarie Dictionary]] now to hopefully stop this vandalism.  I can't believe I didn't think of that sooner. —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 02:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

10471 +++$+++ Nv8200p +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-31 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.138771260E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. No license.  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. No license. [[User:Nv8200p|Nv8200p]] [[User_talk:Nv8200p|talk]] 21:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
10472 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10471 +++$+++ 10471 +++$+++ 2006-01-31 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.138771800E09 +++$+++ Details were given. It is used with premission by the author.  +++$+++ : Details were given. It is used with premission by the author. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 21:30, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

10474 +++$+++ Rick Block +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10474 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-19 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.119231120E09 +++$+++ Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in [[User:Rick Block\/WP600 not admins|this list]]?  I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it.  Thanks. --  +++$+++ Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in [[User:Rick Block/WP600 not admins|this list]]?  I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it.  Thanks. -- [[user:Rick Block|Rick Block]] <small>([[user talk:Rick Block|talk]])</small> 18:32, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
10475 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10474 +++$+++ 10474 +++$+++ 2006-02-01 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.138851840E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't mind being an admin, as I am already a SysOp on the [[Hebrew Wikipedia]]. However, I must be honest and note I spent most of my times there and my actvity here have declined sharply, though I'm still making edits once in a while.  +++$+++ : I wouldn't mind being an admin, as I am already a SysOp on the [[Hebrew Wikipedia]]. However, I must be honest and note I spent most of my times there and my actvity here have declined sharply, though I'm still making edits once in a while. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 19:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

482343 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.168842840E09 +++$+++ <div style=\"padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE;\"> An image that you uploaded, [[: Image:Leesmitha.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]] because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its [[: Image:Leesmitha.jpg|page]], if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Idw-cp --> <\/div> \u2014 +++$+++ <div style="padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE;"> An image that you uploaded, [[: Image:Leesmitha.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]] because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its [[: Image:Leesmitha.jpg|page]], if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Idw-cp --> </div> —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 22:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
482344 +++$+++ Nareklm +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482343 +++$+++ 482343 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.168842960E09 +++$+++ You can just delete it since i don't feel like feeling in the details :)  +++$+++ :You can just delete it since i don't feel like feeling in the details :) [[User:Nareklm|Nareklm]] 22:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

10477 +++$+++ Ynhockey +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-02 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.141327260E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, your edit was reverted by Zero on the basis that the 'attack' was unsources (and later Zeq's sourced re-addition was deleted on the basis that Arutz Sheva is not a respectable source). I am now arguing with Zero about it, please [[Talk:Machsom Watch|have a look]]. Your input would be appreciated. -- <font face=\"wingdings\">Y<\/font>  +++$+++ Just to let you know, your edit was reverted by Zero on the basis that the 'attack' was unsources (and later Zeq's sourced re-addition was deleted on the basis that Arutz Sheva is not a respectable source). I am now arguing with Zero about it, please [[Talk:Machsom Watch|have a look]]. Your input would be appreciated. -- <font face="wingdings">Y</font> [[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] || [[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]] <font face="wingdings">Y</font> 11:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
10478 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10477 +++$+++ 10477 +++$+++ 2006-03-02 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.141333500E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the notice, I took care of that.  +++$+++ : Thank you for the notice, I took care of that. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 13:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

10479 +++$+++ Zeq +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10479 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-09 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.141946220E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation#Machsom_Watch  +++$+++ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation#Machsom_Watch [[User:Zeq|Zeq]] 15:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
10480 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10479 +++$+++ 10479 +++$+++ 2006-03-09 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.141973700E09 +++$+++ Depends on what the controersy is about. I was involved in YNET-link contraversy which I see was solved. The current version of the article is OK to me, so I would like to know what is the contraversy.  +++$+++ : Depends on what the controersy is about. I was involved in YNET-link contraversy which I see was solved. The current version of the article is OK to me, so I would like to know what is the contraversy. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 22:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

10481 +++$+++ Zeq +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10481 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-12 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.142190540E09 +++$+++ take another look please  +++$+++ take another look please [[User:Zeq|Zeq]] 11:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
10482 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10481 +++$+++ 10481 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.142196780E09 +++$+++ I see no major problems in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Machsom_Watch&oldid=43408998 this version]. If you see some, please tell me so I can check it further.  +++$+++ : I see no major problems in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Machsom_Watch&oldid=43408998 this version]. If you see some, please tell me so I can check it further. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 12:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

10483 +++$+++ Donama +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-06 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.149632640E09 +++$+++ Mathknight, the he: interwiki link you put on the [[Oxalis pes-caprae]] article (\u05d7\u05de\u05e6\u05d9\u05e5) appears to be about [[Oxalis]] in general, not the specific species. Shouldn't the interviki link be (\u05d7\u05de\u05e6\u05d9\u05e5 \u05e0\u05d8\u05d5\u05d9)? &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ Mathknight, the he: interwiki link you put on the [[Oxalis pes-caprae]] article (חמציץ) appears to be about [[Oxalis]] in general, not the specific species. Shouldn't the interviki link be (חמציץ נטוי)? &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Donama|Donama]] 15:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
10484 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10483 +++$+++ 10483 +++$+++ 2006-06-07 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.149731220E09 +++$+++ The Hebrew Wikipedia article \u05d7\u05de\u05e6\u05d9\u05e5 talks about \u05d7\u05de\u05e6\u05d9\u05e5 \u05e0\u05d8\u05d5\u05d9 (Oxalis pes-caprae) only. So there is no problem about it.  +++$+++ : The Hebrew Wikipedia article חמציץ talks about חמציץ נטוי (Oxalis pes-caprae) only. So there is no problem about it. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 18:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

45438 +++$+++ Ebikeguy +++$+++ Mariordo +++$+++ 45438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-22 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.298442960E09 +++$+++ I just looked at your edit count, and it would appear you are entitled to display the box above, if you want.  If not, erase this whole post.   +++$+++ I just looked at your edit count, and it would appear you are entitled to display the box above, if you want.  If not, erase this whole post.  [[User:Ebikeguy|Ebikeguy]] ([[User talk:Ebikeguy|talk]]) 22:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
45439 +++$+++ Mariordo +++$+++ Mariordo +++$+++ 45438 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-23 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.298454840E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I will display it.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks, I will display it.--[[User:Mariordo|Mariordo]] ([[User talk:Mariordo#top|talk]]) 01:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

89129 +++$+++ Vssun +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89129 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312219920E09 +++$+++ Case of usurpation at ml.wikipedia has been taken up. Local user has been informed. Let us wait for his reply for 7 days. Regards -- +++$+++ Case of usurpation at ml.wikipedia has been taken up. Local user has been informed. Let us wait for his reply for 7 days. Regards --[[User:Vssun|Vssun]] ([[User talk:Vssun|talk]]) 10:32, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
89130 +++$+++ Vssun +++$+++ Joy +++$+++ 89129 +++$+++ 89129 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312685100E09 +++$+++ Request processed and done at mlwikipedia. -- +++$+++ :Request processed and done at mlwikipedia. --[[User:Vssun|Vssun]] ([[User talk:Vssun|talk]]) 19:45, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

394964 +++$+++ TerryE +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 394964 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-26 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.267257300E09 +++$+++ Rereading your post, I am not sure what you meant by the comment \"What I have in mind is more about issues like how to manage a large volume of input\".  Perhaps you could explaon on the RFC talk page. --  +++$+++ Rereading your post, I am not sure what you meant by the comment "What I have in mind is more about issues like how to manage a large volume of input".  Perhaps you could explaon on the RFC talk page. -- [[User:TerryE|TerryE]] ([[User talk:TerryE|talk]]) 23:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
394965 +++$+++ TerryE +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 394964 +++$+++ 394964 +++$+++ 2010-02-28 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.267398480E09 +++$+++ I didn't want to drill into details one the RfC page but what we were taught was essentially to use a multi-factor clustering analysis: to try to identify the main modes of view and drive opinion around a compare and contrast of these.  Get all of the outlier noise off the table (whilst remembering that the odd outlier might actually in the end prove to be a basis of mutual acceptability). Isolate disruptors from the consensus and above all keep the process going.  There are tools and techniques to help, but this is a specialist area -- which is why I suggested seeking advice from the appropriate project.  This all being said, it seems to me that you are already doing all this.  The trouble is that you've got a pig of a job.  You can put lipstick on the pig, but ... --  +++$+++ :I didn't want to drill into details one the RfC page but what we were taught was essentially to use a multi-factor clustering analysis: to try to identify the main modes of view and drive opinion around a compare and contrast of these.  Get all of the outlier noise off the table (whilst remembering that the odd outlier might actually in the end prove to be a basis of mutual acceptability). Isolate disruptors from the consensus and above all keep the process going.  There are tools and techniques to help, but this is a specialist area -- which is why I suggested seeking advice from the appropriate project.  This all being said, it seems to me that you are already doing all this.  The trouble is that you've got a pig of a job.  You can put lipstick on the pig, but ... -- [[User:TerryE|TerryE]] ([[User talk:TerryE|talk]]) 15:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
394966 +++$+++ TerryE +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 394964 +++$+++ 394965 +++$+++ 2010-02-28 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.267410780E09 +++$+++ Maurreen, I've added your sandbox to my watch list.  I'll make any comments specific to it on its talk page unless you want them here. --  +++$+++ ::Maurreen, I've added your sandbox to my watch list.  I'll make any comments specific to it on its talk page unless you want them here. -- [[User:TerryE|TerryE]] ([[User talk:TerryE|talk]]) 18:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

534778 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534778 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-12 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.142217120E09 +++$+++ You need to give the diffs (like this: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Kosovo&diff=43453431&oldid=43449809]), not links to the page.  I can, in any case, only see three reverts. -- +++$+++ You need to give the diffs (like this: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kosovo&diff=43453431&oldid=43449809]), not links to the page.  I can, in any case, only see three reverts. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 18:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
534779 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534778 +++$+++ 534778 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.142228400E09 +++$+++ Just to check &mdash; are you happy now about how to provide the diffs?  (I did try to give a link to a relevant Help page, but I couldn't find one; if I do, I'll come back and add it.) -- +++$+++ :Just to check &mdash; are you happy now about how to provide the diffs?  (I did try to give a link to a relevant Help page, but I couldn't find one; if I do, I'll come back and add it.) --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 21:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

10491 +++$+++ Dyfsunctional +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.163732280E09 +++$+++ The above referenced image, which you claim to have created and released under PD, was used by me to create [[:Image:Xyz_boxer.jpg]], which is currently being looked at for copyvio issues.  Can you please comment on where you got the original image at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#November 16]]? Thanks.  +++$+++ The above referenced image, which you claim to have created and released under PD, was used by me to create [[:Image:Xyz_boxer.jpg]], which is currently being looked at for copyvio issues.  Can you please comment on where you got the original image at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#November 16]]? Thanks. [[User:Dyfsunctional|Dyfsunctional]] 18:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
10492 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10491 +++$+++ 10491 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.163733480E09 +++$+++ Honestly, I don't remember. I think it was taken from a bank of free pictures.  +++$+++ : Honestly, I don't remember. I think it was taken from a bank of free pictures. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 19:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
10493 +++$+++ Chick Bowen +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10491 +++$+++ 10492 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.163739180E09 +++$+++ The image is [http:\/\/imdb.com\/gallery\/ss\/0308383\/Ss\/0308383\/0277_rgb.jpg?path=gallery&path_key=0308383 this one]--a screenshot, and not free.  I've asked Dyfsunctional if he's willing to create a replacement, but if you can (using a free image, perhaps from [[:commons:category:boxing|here]]) that would be great.  In the meantime, I'll delete the image above, since it's unused.  Thanks.   +++$+++ ::The image is [http://imdb.com/gallery/ss/0308383/Ss/0308383/0277_rgb.jpg?path=gallery&path_key=0308383 this one]--a screenshot, and not free.  I've asked Dyfsunctional if he's willing to create a replacement, but if you can (using a free image, perhaps from [[:commons:category:boxing|here]]) that would be great.  In the meantime, I'll delete the image above, since it's unused.  Thanks.  [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 20:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

534780 +++$+++ Sam Korn +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534780 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-12 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.142225940E09 +++$+++ Hi.  Please do not reintroduce copyrighted images into these templates.  The only justification Wikipedia has for keeping them on its system is fair use, and fair use will not apply in any circumstance this image is used.  This is to prevent the Wikimedia Foundation from liability for infringing copyrights.  Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi.  Please do not reintroduce copyrighted images into these templates.  The only justification Wikipedia has for keeping them on its system is fair use, and fair use will not apply in any circumstance this image is used.  This is to prevent the Wikimedia Foundation from liability for infringing copyrights.  Cheers, [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]] <sup>[[User talk:Sam Korn|(smoddy)]]</sup> 20:59, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
534781 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534780 +++$+++ 534780 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.142228760E09 +++$+++ Political Party logos can be used freely in Wikipedia. You should do your homeworks before making pointless accusations  +++$+++ :Political Party logos can be used freely in Wikipedia. You should do your homeworks before making pointless accusations [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 21:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
534782 +++$+++ Sam Korn +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534780 +++$+++ 534781 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.142231700E09 +++$+++ I am afraid you are very wrong.  Our fair use policy is *very* strict, rightly and necessarily so.  Don't abuse it.  +++$+++ ::I am afraid you are very wrong.  Our fair use policy is *very* strict, rightly and necessarily so.  Don't abuse it. [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]] <sup>[[User talk:Sam Korn|(smoddy)]]</sup> 22:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
534783 +++$+++ Sam Korn +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534780 +++$+++ 534781 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.142231940E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see your confusion.  Yes, the images are allowed in the article namespace (e.g. for [[Labour Party (UK)]]), but nowhere else.  This is to make sure we fit in with the [[fair use]] [[wikipedia:fair use criteria|criteria]].  Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Ah, I see your confusion.  Yes, the images are allowed in the article namespace (e.g. for [[Labour Party (UK)]]), but nowhere else.  This is to make sure we fit in with the [[fair use]] [[wikipedia:fair use criteria|criteria]].  Cheers, [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]] <sup>[[User talk:Sam Korn|(smoddy)]]</sup> 22:39, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
534784 +++$+++ Chick Bowen +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534780 +++$+++ 534783 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.142232600E09 +++$+++ Sam's right, as you'll see in our [[WP:FAIR|fair use policy]] and please remember our [[WP:NPA|no personal attacks]] and [[WP:CIVIL|civility]] policies.  Thank you.   +++$+++ :::Sam's right, as you'll see in our [[WP:FAIR|fair use policy]] and please remember our [[WP:NPA|no personal attacks]] and [[WP:CIVIL|civility]] policies.  Thank you.  [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 22:50, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
534785 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534780 +++$+++ 534783 +++$+++ 2006-03-13 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.142312880E09 +++$+++ It is not me who needs reminding about [[WP:CIVIL|civility]] and I did not [[WP:NPA| personally attacked]] anyone, my friend. I was accused of uploading copyrighted images. Well, I did not upload the LibDem logo, I simply linked to the already uploaded file, as present in the article. As far as Wikipedia goes, logos can benefit from Fair Use as long as it does not imply that Wikipedia is endorsed by the company or organisation depicted by such logo. This is clearly not the case. The insertion of the logos does not imply recognition or endorsement by Wikipedia or viceversa. It is common sense.  +++$+++ :::It is not me who needs reminding about [[WP:CIVIL|civility]] and I did not [[WP:NPA| personally attacked]] anyone, my friend. I was accused of uploading copyrighted images. Well, I did not upload the LibDem logo, I simply linked to the already uploaded file, as present in the article. As far as Wikipedia goes, logos can benefit from Fair Use as long as it does not imply that Wikipedia is endorsed by the company or organisation depicted by such logo. This is clearly not the case. The insertion of the logos does not imply recognition or endorsement by Wikipedia or viceversa. It is common sense. [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 21:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
534786 +++$+++ Sam Korn +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534780 +++$+++ 534785 +++$+++ 2006-03-13 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.142313420E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid to say that, no, that's not Wikipedia's fair use policy.  Please see [[Wikipedia:Fair use]].  Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::I'm afraid to say that, no, that's not Wikipedia's fair use policy.  Please see [[Wikipedia:Fair use]].  Cheers, [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]] <sup>[[User talk:Sam Korn|(smoddy)]]</sup> 21:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
534787 +++$+++ Sam Korn +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534780 +++$+++ 534780 +++$+++ 2006-03-13 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.142316660E09 +++$+++ I am afraid that keeping \"fair use\" images in your userspace is also against Wikipedia policy.  Please remove them as soon as possible.   +++$+++ :I am afraid that keeping "fair use" images in your userspace is also against Wikipedia policy.  Please remove them as soon as possible.  [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]] <sup>[[User talk:Sam Korn|(smoddy)]]</sup> 22:11, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

10494 +++$+++ Hbdragon88 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-25 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.164527700E09 +++$+++ Could you please clarify the status of this image?  In the source description, you state that it can only be used for educational purposes only.  However, the tag states this: ''The following conditions must not include terms '''which restrict usage to educational or not-for-profit purposes''' or prohibit derivatives''.  Any license here needs to allow commercial usage of the image.  Are you willing to license it for commercial usage?  +++$+++ Could you please clarify the status of this image?  In the source description, you state that it can only be used for educational purposes only.  However, the tag states this: ''The following conditions must not include terms '''which restrict usage to educational or not-for-profit purposes''' or prohibit derivatives''.  Any license here needs to allow commercial usage of the image.  Are you willing to license it for commercial usage? [[User:Hbdragon88|Hbdragon88]] 23:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
10495 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10494 +++$+++ 10494 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.164582960E09 +++$+++ O.K. As long as credit is given.  +++$+++ : O.K. As long as credit is given. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 15:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

10500 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10500 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-31 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.167597780E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 12:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
10501 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10500 +++$+++ 10500 +++$+++ 2006-12-31 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.167603480E09 +++$+++ It's a seal of a governmental agency.  +++$+++ : It's a seal of a governmental agency. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 14:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

534789 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-15 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.142490900E09 +++$+++ I did not ignore anyone. I was falsely accused of uploading copyrighted images. I was simply using Wikipedia Commons images into a template, which is perfectly legit. I have no time to waste with feeble accusations from anyone, whether he is or not an administrator. Some people are more equal than others, I assume. Best wishes,  +++$+++ I did not ignore anyone. I was falsely accused of uploading copyrighted images. I was simply using Wikipedia Commons images into a template, which is perfectly legit. I have no time to waste with feeble accusations from anyone, whether he is or not an administrator. Some people are more equal than others, I assume. Best wishes, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 22:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
534790 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534789 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.143016200E09 +++$+++ [[User:NicholasTurnbull|Nicholas'''Turnbull''']] is there a way to block Asterion from vandalizing [[Kosovo]] site as well? seems like he\/she is one of those that interferes in articles that he\/she has no clue about. regards, +++$+++ ::[[User:NicholasTurnbull|Nicholas'''Turnbull''']] is there a way to block Asterion from vandalizing [[Kosovo]] site as well? seems like he/she is one of those that interferes in articles that he/she has no clue about. regards,[[User:Ilir pz|Ilir pz]] 00:30, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
534791 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534789 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.143016680E09 +++$+++ Refer to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Wikipedia:Suspected_sockpuppets_of_Ilir_pz Category:Wikipedia:Suspected sockpuppets of Ilir pz] for details on this individual.  +++$+++ :::Refer to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia:Suspected_sockpuppets_of_Ilir_pz Category:Wikipedia:Suspected sockpuppets of Ilir pz] for details on this individual. [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 00:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

10502 +++$+++ Fang Aili +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-09 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.171067460E09 +++$+++ Re: [[:Image:Explosive-belt01.jpg]], did you create the scan yourself? Also someone is disputing the fair use assertion. Cheers,  +++$+++ Re: [[:Image:Explosive-belt01.jpg]], did you create the scan yourself? Also someone is disputing the fair use assertion. Cheers, [[User:Fang Aili|Fang Aili]] <sup>[[User talk:Fang Aili|<font color="green">talk</font>]]</sup> 16:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
10503 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10502 +++$+++ 10502 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.172885520E09 +++$+++ I scanned it myself from a police brochure distributed to civilian during the wave of terror Israel suffered in the last years.  +++$+++ : I scanned it myself from a police brochure distributed to civilian during the wave of terror Israel suffered in the last years. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 17:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

569729 +++$+++ Zbl +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569729 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-19 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.171951380E09 +++$+++ I saw that you gave this user two warnings within 1 minute.  Is it possible that this user made the second bad edit, whatever it was, before seeing the first warning?  +++$+++ I saw that you gave this user two warnings within 1 minute.  Is it possible that this user made the second bad edit, whatever it was, before seeing the first warning? [[User:Zbl|Zbl]] 22:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
569730 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569729 +++$+++ 569729 +++$+++ 2007-02-19 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.171951680E09 +++$+++ It's possible but who can tell in a hypothetical situation?  The messagebox would have popped up as per usual.  +++$+++ :It's possible but who can tell in a hypothetical situation?  The messagebox would have popped up as per usual. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:08, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

10504 +++$+++ Badger151 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10504 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.172285400E09 +++$+++ Hi - I'm going through the [[ambulance]] page in an attetmpt to pull it up to featured article status, which of course includes chasing down references, etc.  If I'm reading the page history correctly, the information regarding Israel's Merkava military ambulance was provided by you ([[ambulance#Military ambulances]], last paragraph).  I'd like to put in a citation for that, particularly for the deaths of the two soldiers at Palestinian hands after attempting to help a Palestinian woman; I don't suppose you remember where you found that info?  Thanks -- +++$+++ Hi - I'm going through the [[ambulance]] page in an attetmpt to pull it up to featured article status, which of course includes chasing down references, etc.  If I'm reading the page history correctly, the information regarding Israel's Merkava military ambulance was provided by you ([[ambulance#Military ambulances]], last paragraph).  I'd like to put in a citation for that, particularly for the deaths of the two soldiers at Palestinian hands after attempting to help a Palestinian woman; I don't suppose you remember where you found that info?  Thanks --[[User:Badger151|Badger151]] 18:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
10505 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10504 +++$+++ 10504 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.172889300E09 +++$+++ As for the TankAmbulance, it was reported in the Hebrew media and as I didn't saved the articles\\reports then I cannot find references. Maybe you can try searching \"tankbulance\" in [[Google]] (for example: [freerepublic.com\/focus\/f-news\/1672077\/posts this]). As for the the two soldiers helping an old woman, it was again widely reported in the Israeli press. You can cite the Hebrew Wikipedia as reference.  +++$+++ : As for the TankAmbulance, it was reported in the Hebrew media and as I didn't saved the articles\reports then I cannot find references. Maybe you can try searching "tankbulance" in [[Google]] (for example: [freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1672077/posts this]). As for the the two soldiers helping an old woman, it was again widely reported in the Israeli press. You can cite the Hebrew Wikipedia as reference. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 18:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

272649 +++$+++ Rarelibra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-16 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.155771300E09 +++$+++ Don't lecture me until you learn more about me. I am award-winning in my industry and I work on a regular basis with the United Nations Cartographic Group. I think I have valid input. Read above - hard to take things serious when you have such as yourselves going around quoting rules and not assuming good faith at the efforts of others.  +++$+++ Don't lecture me until you learn more about me. I am award-winning in my industry and I work on a regular basis with the United Nations Cartographic Group. I think I have valid input. Read above - hard to take things serious when you have such as yourselves going around quoting rules and not assuming good faith at the efforts of others. [[User:Rarelibra|Rarelibra]] 16:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
272650 +++$+++ Rarelibra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272649 +++$+++ 272649 +++$+++ 2006-08-16 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.155771960E09 +++$+++ Honestly? I don't have time for this. It will become my 'opinion' against that of the 'regular' contributors as such stated. Consider this - working with countries and administrative levels, I can visit 20 or 30 country pages in ONE DAY. As such, I have been able to make small (and numerous) changes at many of the various pages, be it alphabetizing, name changes, formatting, maps, etc. So I am then not qualified as a 'regular' for a page like Australia. But in my overall edits, do I not qualify on the topic of standardization (American spelling - ha!)? So you see, I do not wish to discuss... they want it that way, fine. But that doesn't mean that most of the other countries will be standardized. Life is too short and the world is too beautiful to stress over what a 'consensus' feels should be displayed on an Internet page, you see? Cheers  +++$+++ :Honestly? I don't have time for this. It will become my 'opinion' against that of the 'regular' contributors as such stated. Consider this - working with countries and administrative levels, I can visit 20 or 30 country pages in ONE DAY. As such, I have been able to make small (and numerous) changes at many of the various pages, be it alphabetizing, name changes, formatting, maps, etc. So I am then not qualified as a 'regular' for a page like Australia. But in my overall edits, do I not qualify on the topic of standardization (American spelling - ha!)? So you see, I do not wish to discuss... they want it that way, fine. But that doesn't mean that most of the other countries will be standardized. Life is too short and the world is too beautiful to stress over what a 'consensus' feels should be displayed on an Internet page, you see? Cheers [[User:Rarelibra|Rarelibra]] 16:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
272651 +++$+++ Rarelibra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272649 +++$+++ 272649 +++$+++ 2006-08-16 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.155773880E09 +++$+++ No, I disagree. You PERCEIVE it as egocentric and arrogant and such. But then again, contributions on the [[Nissan Maxima]] page were seen as too \"American\" and not including a 'world' viewpoint, thus, were criticized. And if I were to state what you said on my talk page, with the focus on the Maxima in North America (where it is still produced), I would be labeled and told not to do so. So it is a two-way street. It is far from being egocentric and arrogant - be careful of accusatory or insulting phrases, as you may be perceived as being the 'arrogant' or 'egocentric' one. Enough of this. I'll just be an outside viewer. Too many times people cannot agree and continue to revert to their own 'consensual' liking. That is the failure of Wikipedia. Besides, it only takes so long before someone comes along and completely changes what you've worked so hard at, right? Especially if they are a 'regular' contributor as to a SME contributor. Read the history of the formatting discussion I had - the claim is to have a capital letter and then smaller-case letters (such as \"Administrative divisions\") when TRUE manuals of style state the proper use would be \"Administrative Divisions\". So when a 'consensus' says one thing contradictory to true or official standards, then what?  +++$+++ :No, I disagree. You PERCEIVE it as egocentric and arrogant and such. But then again, contributions on the [[Nissan Maxima]] page were seen as too "American" and not including a 'world' viewpoint, thus, were criticized. And if I were to state what you said on my talk page, with the focus on the Maxima in North America (where it is still produced), I would be labeled and told not to do so. So it is a two-way street. It is far from being egocentric and arrogant - be careful of accusatory or insulting phrases, as you may be perceived as being the 'arrogant' or 'egocentric' one. Enough of this. I'll just be an outside viewer. Too many times people cannot agree and continue to revert to their own 'consensual' liking. That is the failure of Wikipedia. Besides, it only takes so long before someone comes along and completely changes what you've worked so hard at, right? Especially if they are a 'regular' contributor as to a SME contributor. Read the history of the formatting discussion I had - the claim is to have a capital letter and then smaller-case letters (such as "Administrative divisions") when TRUE manuals of style state the proper use would be "Administrative Divisions". So when a 'consensus' says one thing contradictory to true or official standards, then what? [[User:Rarelibra|Rarelibra]] 17:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

10508 +++$+++ NYC2TLV +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10508 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.181065740E09 +++$+++ Please get your facts straight before you start a personal attack rumor. I don't know this guy, but if he is the same as [[User:Hapoelhaifa3|Hapoelhaifa3]] or whatever he goes by, then his edits are full of POV, doesn't use documentation (No personal research, right), and threatened to sue me. I have little interest in starting up with childish Israeli preteens, I am simply playing by the rules. - +++$+++ Please get your facts straight before you start a personal attack rumor. I don't know this guy, but if he is the same as [[User:Hapoelhaifa3|Hapoelhaifa3]] or whatever he goes by, then his edits are full of POV, doesn't use documentation (No personal research, right), and threatened to sue me. I have little interest in starting up with childish Israeli preteens, I am simply playing by the rules. -[[User:NYC2TLV|NYC2TLV]] 10:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
10509 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10508 +++$+++ 10508 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.181074140E09 +++$+++ I think you both should avoid personal attacks and have some can of mediation (\u05ea\u05d9\u05d5\u05d5\u05da) to overcome the differences. It is better if you will try talk each other for understanding instead of forcing out changes.  +++$+++ : I think you both should avoid personal attacks and have some can of mediation (תיווך) to overcome the differences. It is better if you will try talk each other for understanding instead of forcing out changes. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 13:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

272654 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272654 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-13 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.155500280E09 +++$+++ Hi, Sarah. In short, Cerejota is pushing his POV, and is gaming the system with his reverts.  He's out of reverts, yet he continues to revert to previous versions, which as far as I can tell, means he has reverted at least five times in 24 hours.  A link to 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict is already in the article (linked in context, in the appropriate section as \"ongoing conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon\" in reference to the JF). The only reason Cerejota is linking to 2006 Israel-Gaza conflict is because he wants to, and I've asked hin not to edit the article based on his POV.  This began when I originally added a link in the see also section to [[August 1999 Los Angeles Jewish Community Center shooting]], which for some very strange and unknown reason, made him extremely upset, leading him to engage in wild, trollish behavior, as evidenced [[Talk:July_2006_Seattle_Jewish_Federation_shooting#See_also|here]], even though my addition of that link was [[Talk:July_2006_Seattle_Jewish_Federation_shooting#August_1999_Los_Angeles_Jewish_Community_Center_shooting|supported by references]], whereas his changes are not.  Worse, his reverting of the lead is actually a major distortion of the article, as the quote in the lead is not a quote but a paraphrase of something a witness said.  I fixed the article by placing the full alleged quotes in the context of the events themselves.  I feel that my version sticks to the facts without placing undue emphasis on dated material by placing time-sensitive information (which is already out of date) into the appropriate sections.  The current version fails on many levels.  I prefer [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=July_2006_Seattle_Jewish_Federation_shooting&oldid=69379406 this particular version] because it sticks to known facts within a chronology that does not date, and does not attempt to take any particular side. &mdash; +++$+++ Hi, Sarah. In short, Cerejota is pushing his POV, and is gaming the system with his reverts.  He's out of reverts, yet he continues to revert to previous versions, which as far as I can tell, means he has reverted at least five times in 24 hours.  A link to 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict is already in the article (linked in context, in the appropriate section as "ongoing conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon" in reference to the JF). The only reason Cerejota is linking to 2006 Israel-Gaza conflict is because he wants to, and I've asked hin not to edit the article based on his POV.  This began when I originally added a link in the see also section to [[August 1999 Los Angeles Jewish Community Center shooting]], which for some very strange and unknown reason, made him extremely upset, leading him to engage in wild, trollish behavior, as evidenced [[Talk:July_2006_Seattle_Jewish_Federation_shooting#See_also|here]], even though my addition of that link was [[Talk:July_2006_Seattle_Jewish_Federation_shooting#August_1999_Los_Angeles_Jewish_Community_Center_shooting|supported by references]], whereas his changes are not.  Worse, his reverting of the lead is actually a major distortion of the article, as the quote in the lead is not a quote but a paraphrase of something a witness said.  I fixed the article by placing the full alleged quotes in the context of the events themselves.  I feel that my version sticks to the facts without placing undue emphasis on dated material by placing time-sensitive information (which is already out of date) into the appropriate sections.  The current version fails on many levels.  I prefer [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=July_2006_Seattle_Jewish_Federation_shooting&oldid=69379406 this particular version] because it sticks to known facts within a chronology that does not date, and does not attempt to take any particular side. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 13:18, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
272655 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272654 +++$+++ 272654 +++$+++ 2006-08-14 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.155571680E09 +++$+++ Check your e-mail. &mdash; +++$+++ :Check your e-mail. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 09:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
272656 +++$+++ Jgwlaw +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272654 +++$+++ 272654 +++$+++ 2006-08-13 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.155509460E09 +++$+++ I will p;ost in discussion (as I did the last time) regarding the reason for removal, in addition to posting the reason in the edit summary.  THe paragraph with 'illegal' was not just factually incorrect, but it was also a posterad for the author's intent for writing the article - pure hatred and judgmentalism.  A poor reason for an encyclopedia article, although this is by no means the only example of that. +++$+++ :I will p;ost in discussion (as I did the last time) regarding the reason for removal, in addition to posting the reason in the edit summary.  THe paragraph with 'illegal' was not just factually incorrect, but it was also a posterad for the author's intent for writing the article - pure hatred and judgmentalism.  A poor reason for an encyclopedia article, although this is by no means the only example of that.[[User:Jgwlaw|jawesq]] 15:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

10511 +++$+++ 3R1C +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10511 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-02 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.183360080E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to say thanks for uploading a higher-quality image!  Much appreciated \/\/  +++$+++ Just wanted to say thanks for uploading a higher-quality image!  Much appreciated // [[User:3R1C|3R1C]] 00:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
10512 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10511 +++$+++ 10511 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.183397700E09 +++$+++ You welcome. Credit should go to Michael Mass, the photographer.  +++$+++ : You welcome. Credit should go to Michael Mass, the photographer. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 10:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

10513 +++$+++ Pelegisrael +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10513 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-25 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.190719680E09 +++$+++ Hello MathKnight. Can you look at the above mentioned article? I wrote it two days ago, according to the opening sgement of the Hebrew article, and nobody looked at it ever since. I guess your english is better than mine, and I'm afraid there are many mistakes in the article's English, that needs correcting. Thanks again -  +++$+++ Hello MathKnight. Can you look at the above mentioned article? I wrote it two days ago, according to the opening sgement of the Hebrew article, and nobody looked at it ever since. I guess your english is better than mine, and I'm afraid there are many mistakes in the article's English, that needs correcting. Thanks again - [[User:Pelegisrael|Pelegisrael]] 04:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
10514 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10513 +++$+++ 10513 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.190846280E09 +++$+++ I'll go over it.  +++$+++ : I'll go over it. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 15:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
10515 +++$+++ Pelegisrael +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10513 +++$+++ 10514 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.190862300E09 +++$+++ Thanks, and Chag Sameach!  +++$+++ ::Thanks, and Chag Sameach! [[User:Pelegisrael|Pelegisrael]] 20:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

272658 +++$+++ Ottawaman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272658 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-14 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.155545040E09 +++$+++ What are they? Where did that offensive photo come from?  +++$+++ What are they? Where did that offensive photo come from? [[User:Ottawaman|Ottawaman]] 01:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
272659 +++$+++ Ottawaman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272658 +++$+++ 272658 +++$+++ 2006-08-14 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.155545040E09 +++$+++ wow; i can't possibly relate to anyone who would misuse that photo in such a way.  +++$+++ :wow; i can't possibly relate to anyone who would misuse that photo in such a way. [[User:Ottawaman|Ottawaman]] 01:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
272660 +++$+++ FellowWikipedian +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272658 +++$+++ 272659 +++$+++ 2006-08-14 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.155609540E09 +++$+++ Why are we still talking about that? [[User:FellowWikipedian|FellowWikip]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ ::Why are we still talking about that? [[User:FellowWikipedian|FellowWikip]]<font color="green">[[User:FellowWikipedian/Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User talk:FellowWikipedian|dian]] 19:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

118784 +++$+++ Connormah +++$+++ Anthony Bradbury +++$+++ 118784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-08 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.284009720E09 +++$+++ Just saw the unblock decline after I unblocked - it was a bad block on my part, IMO. The speedy was also declined, so there isn't really a chance of the IP repeating the activity - sorry about the conflict.  +++$+++ Just saw the unblock decline after I unblocked - it was a bad block on my part, IMO. The speedy was also declined, so there isn't really a chance of the IP repeating the activity - sorry about the conflict. [[User:Connormah|Connormah]] ([[User talk:Connormah|talk]]) 22:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
118785 +++$+++ Connormah +++$+++ Anthony Bradbury +++$+++ 118784 +++$+++ 118784 +++$+++ 2010-09-08 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.284010140E09 +++$+++ I'm also with you somewhat - maybe a PROD is in order?  +++$+++ :I'm also with you somewhat - maybe a PROD is in order? [[User:Connormah|Connormah]] ([[User talk:Connormah|talk]]) 22:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

10516 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10516 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-05 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.191601680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] 09:28, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
10517 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10516 +++$+++ 10516 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.191604980E09 +++$+++ Yes, I do love Gothic architecture and Gothic music. I wrote the Hebrew value for it in the Hebrew Wikipedia. I think the leading pictures should include an exterior picture of a Gothic cathedral and not just the interior. Though Cologne cathedral was finished only in the 19th century, the building went according to 13th centuey blueprints, so it is pretty loyal to medieval Gothic architecture. I could do one in English, but I suggest you find a picture of a cathedral that was complete in the Middle Ages and not in the Gothic Revival era (as you said that is a con against choosing Cologne cathedral). I am an Orthodox Jew, not Christian or Messianic in any way. I just love gothic architecture and music.  +++$+++ : Yes, I do love Gothic architecture and Gothic music. I wrote the Hebrew value for it in the Hebrew Wikipedia. I think the leading pictures should include an exterior picture of a Gothic cathedral and not just the interior. Though Cologne cathedral was finished only in the 19th century, the building went according to 13th centuey blueprints, so it is pretty loyal to medieval Gothic architecture. I could do one in English, but I suggest you find a picture of a cathedral that was complete in the Middle Ages and not in the Gothic Revival era (as you said that is a con against choosing Cologne cathedral). I am an Orthodox Jew, not Christian or Messianic in any way. I just love gothic architecture and music. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 10:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
10518 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10516 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.191870900E09 +++$+++ If you have a sense of humour, go and look at the discussion page of [[Sistine Chapel ceiling]].  +++$+++ ::: If you have a sense of humour, go and look at the discussion page of [[Sistine Chapel ceiling]]. [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] 12:15, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
10519 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10516 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.191872100E09 +++$+++ I saw the last pic in the Sistine Chapel talk page. :-D , very amusing.  +++$+++ ::: I saw the last pic in the Sistine Chapel talk page. :-D , very amusing. [[User:MathKnight|MathKnight]] 12:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

534806 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534806 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-19 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.142829540E09 +++$+++ Mikkalai is an administrator. Not exactly the kind of born-yesterday \"wikipidean\" you have been canvassing. Regards,  +++$+++ Mikkalai is an administrator. Not exactly the kind of born-yesterday "wikipidean" you have been canvassing. Regards, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 20:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
534807 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534806 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-20 08:31:00 +++$+++ 1.142872260E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome!  +++$+++ ::You're very welcome! [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 08:31, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

534809 +++$+++ Sam Korn +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534809 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-25 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.143328800E09 +++$+++ Hi.  Please do not edit Arbitration Committee proposed decision pages.  As it reads at the top, ''Non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.''  Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi.  Please do not edit Arbitration Committee proposed decision pages.  As it reads at the top, ''Non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.''  Thanks, [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]] <sup>[[User talk:Sam Korn|(smoddy)]]</sup> 15:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
534810 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534809 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-25 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.143328920E09 +++$+++ I apologise. This is not completely obvious.  +++$+++ ::I apologise. This is not completely obvious. [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 15:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
534811 +++$+++ Sam Korn +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534809 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-25 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.143329100E09 +++$+++ No harm done. ;-)  +++$+++ :::No harm done. ;-) [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]] <sup>[[User talk:Sam Korn|(smoddy)]]</sup> 15:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

10524 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10524 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-09 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.197226680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 10:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
10525 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10524 +++$+++ 10524 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.197245040E09 +++$+++ In my resolution (1024px) it looks good and fit nicely in the gap near the table of contents. Maybe we should place Chartres picture below the intterior of Zanipolo, and it will be less disturbing to you. The picture suit for the opening sequence because it show one of the three aspects: western facade, interior and profile exterior with flying buttresses. I think it adds and not damage the aestetics of the article. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ : In my resolution (1024px) it looks good and fit nicely in the gap near the table of contents. Maybe we should place Chartres picture below the intterior of Zanipolo, and it will be less disturbing to you. The picture suit for the opening sequence because it show one of the three aspects: western facade, interior and profile exterior with flying buttresses. I think it adds and not damage the aestetics of the article. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight\Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 16:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

10526 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-11 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.197394320E09 +++$+++ Hooroo!  +++$+++ Hooroo! [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 09:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
10527 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10526 +++$+++ 10526 +++$+++ 2007-12-11 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.197424800E09 +++$+++ I also suggest to keep the photo of [[Clermont-Ferrand Cathedral]], [[Milan Cathedral]] and add pictures of [[Cologne Cathedral]] (maybe to put [[:Image:Gothic-Cologne-cathedral002.gif]] in the revival section), [[:Image:Salisbury Cathedral Detail Arches.jpg]] (Gothic 4-ribbed vaults at [[Salisbury Cathedral]]), [[:Image:Catedral de Burgos-Fern\xe1n Gonz\xe1lez.JPG]] (Gothic in Spain, [[Burgos cathedral]]). '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ : I also suggest to keep the photo of [[Clermont-Ferrand Cathedral]], [[Milan Cathedral]] and add pictures of [[Cologne Cathedral]] (maybe to put [[:Image:Gothic-Cologne-cathedral002.gif]] in the revival section), [[:Image:Salisbury Cathedral Detail Arches.jpg]] (Gothic 4-ribbed vaults at [[Salisbury Cathedral]]), [[:Image:Catedral de Burgos-Fernán González.JPG]] (Gothic in Spain, [[Burgos cathedral]]). '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight\Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 18:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
10528 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10526 +++$+++ 10526 +++$+++ 2007-12-11 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.197426480E09 +++$+++ Consider also: [[:Image:Cathedral of Amiens front.jpg]], [[:Image:CanterburyCathedral.png]] and [[:Image:Uppsala Cathedral.jpg]] ([[Brick Gothic]]). '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ : Consider also: [[:Image:Cathedral of Amiens front.jpg]], [[:Image:CanterburyCathedral.png]] and [[:Image:Uppsala Cathedral.jpg]] ([[Brick Gothic]]). '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight\Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 18:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

567738 +++$+++ Neil +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567738 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.193247360E09 +++$+++ I've semi-protected all those subpages and your talk page archives for you.  Happy editing!  +++$+++ I've semi-protected all those subpages and your talk page archives for you.  Happy editing! [[User:Neil|<span style="text-decoration:none; font-family: cursive ;color: #006600">Neil</span>]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Neil|<span style="text-decoration:none; color: #006600">☎</span>]] 10:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
567739 +++$+++ Neil +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567738 +++$+++ 567738 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.193248260E09 +++$+++ No problem.  +++$+++ :No problem. [[User:Neil|<span style="text-decoration:none; font-family: cursive ;color: #006600">Neil</span>]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Neil|<span style="text-decoration:none; color: #006600">☎</span>]] 10:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

10529 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10529 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-21 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.198267320E09 +++$+++ I will get back to it.  +++$+++ I will get back to it. [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 12:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
10530 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10529 +++$+++ 10529 +++$+++ 2007-12-21 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.198283520E09 +++$+++ '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ : '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight\Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 16:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

10531 +++$+++ Amire80 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-16 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.197850620E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you edited [[Shin Bet]] and [[Shabak]]. Is there a reason they aren't merged? They are nearly identical. -- +++$+++ I noticed that you edited [[Shin Bet]] and [[Shabak]]. Is there a reason they aren't merged? They are nearly identical. --[[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 16:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
10532 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10531 +++$+++ 10531 +++$+++ 2007-12-16 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.197851340E09 +++$+++ It seem strange to me too there are 2 articles, of course they should be merged. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ : It seem strange to me too there are 2 articles, of course they should be merged. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight\Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 16:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

272678 +++$+++ Cartman02au +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-09 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.155142440E09 +++$+++ I didn't get your email -  +++$+++ I didn't get your email - [[User:Cartman02au|Cartman02au]] 09:54, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
272679 +++$+++ Cartman02au +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272678 +++$+++ 272678 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.155142920E09 +++$+++ That would have been my westnet.com.au address, unfortunately I am not at home at the moment (I thought you used my gmail address, sorry bout that) -  +++$+++ :That would have been my westnet.com.au address, unfortunately I am not at home at the moment (I thought you used my gmail address, sorry bout that) - [[User:Cartman02au|Cartman02au]] 10:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

10536 +++$+++ Angr +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10536 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.202960640E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> \u2014[[User:Angr|'''An''']][[User talk:Angr|''gr'']] <sup> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> —[[User:Angr|'''An''']][[User talk:Angr|''gr'']] <sup>[[User:Angr/If|If you've written a quality article...]]</sup> 19:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
10537 +++$+++ Angr +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10536 +++$+++ 10536 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.202963220E09 +++$+++ Where is the evidence the image was released into the [[public domain]]? Making an image or a movie freely available to the public is ''not'' the same thing. Unless you can show that the IDF released all rights as copyright holder to the movie, there's no reason to think the image is public domain. \u2014[[User:Angr|'''An''']][[User talk:Angr|''gr'']] <sup> +++$+++ :Where is the evidence the image was released into the [[public domain]]? Making an image or a movie freely available to the public is ''not'' the same thing. Unless you can show that the IDF released all rights as copyright holder to the movie, there's no reason to think the image is public domain. —[[User:Angr|'''An''']][[User talk:Angr|''gr'']] <sup>[[User:Angr/If|If you've written a quality article...]]</sup> 20:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
10538 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10536 +++$+++ 10537 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.202965740E09 +++$+++ The movie was released to all media outlets and was offered for free downloading in the old IDF website (that was removed and replaced by a new one). '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :: The movie was released to all media outlets and was offered for free downloading in the old IDF website (that was removed and replaced by a new one). '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight\Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 21:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

272681 +++$+++ Pete Peters +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-11 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.155291540E09 +++$+++ As for the removals going on in the Talk page.  The removals I am talking about seem to come from the anon IPs with strong accusations. Are these edits being dumped into both user talk pages, or just Ottawamans? I feel lots of this dumping by Anon IPs is nothing more than One UPminship.  I wonder if Ottawaman in related to [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Warren Kinsella\/Evidence|this?]]  +++$+++ As for the removals going on in the Talk page.  The removals I am talking about seem to come from the anon IPs with strong accusations. Are these edits being dumped into both user talk pages, or just Ottawamans? I feel lots of this dumping by Anon IPs is nothing more than One UPminship.  I wonder if Ottawaman in related to [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Warren Kinsella/Evidence|this?]] [[User:Pete Peters|Pete Peters]] 03:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
272682 +++$+++ Pete Peters +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272681 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.155293040E09 +++$+++ This entry's history log seems very confusing.  Though, I wouldn't be suprised if many of the Pro Ignatieff editors are doing the edits from Ignatieff's leadership campaign headquarters.  I was tipped off that Ottawaman might be related because his need to cry foul at the Administrator intervention against vandalism and for his desire to revert back to his version calling it consensus version. I recommend [[User:CJCurrie|CJCurrie]] to resolve this, I have declared him the Wikipedian authority of Canadian Politics :)  +++$+++ ::This entry's history log seems very confusing.  Though, I wouldn't be suprised if many of the Pro Ignatieff editors are doing the edits from Ignatieff's leadership campaign headquarters.  I was tipped off that Ottawaman might be related because his need to cry foul at the Administrator intervention against vandalism and for his desire to revert back to his version calling it consensus version. I recommend [[User:CJCurrie|CJCurrie]] to resolve this, I have declared him the Wikipedian authority of Canadian Politics :) [[User:Pete Peters|Pete Peters]] 03:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
272683 +++$+++ Pete Peters +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272681 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.155327720E09 +++$+++ I updated Your Medal Chest.  +++$+++ :::I updated Your Medal Chest. [[User:Pete Peters|Pete Peters]] 13:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

10539 +++$+++ Jayjg +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10539 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-15 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.203073140E09 +++$+++ I see you've been editing again after a long hiatus. Hope all is well with you.  +++$+++ I see you've been editing again after a long hiatus. Hope all is well with you. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 02:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
10540 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10539 +++$+++ 10539 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.203124560E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I now invest most of the time in the [[Hebrew Wikipedia]], since there is a lot of work to be done there and here much of it was done by others and I have little to add. Recently, I jumped over here once in a time to fix some errors regarding Israeli issues but I can't gernatee I'll visit here in high frequency. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ : Thank you. I now invest most of the time in the [[Hebrew Wikipedia]], since there is a lot of work to be done there and here much of it was done by others and I have little to add. Recently, I jumped over here once in a time to fix some errors regarding Israeli issues but I can't gernatee I'll visit here in high frequency. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight\Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 17:16, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

262222 +++$+++ 24.180.173.157 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-14 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.289727540E09 +++$+++ Hello, can you please re-review the [[Plains zebra]] article for WikiProject Equine? It's come a long way and surely can no longer be considered a \"start\" article. [[Special:Contributions\/24.180.173.157|24.180.173.157]] ( +++$+++ Hello, can you please re-review the [[Plains zebra]] article for WikiProject Equine? It's come a long way and surely can no longer be considered a "start" article. [[Special:Contributions/24.180.173.157|24.180.173.157]] ([[User talk:24.180.173.157|talk]]) 01:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
262223 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262222 +++$+++ 262222 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.289728200E09 +++$+++ I've re-rated it as C class. It needs a few more references before I would really consider it B-class.  +++$+++ :I've re-rated it as C class. It needs a few more references before I would really consider it B-class. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 01:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

534829 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534829 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-06 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.144368960E09 +++$+++ Note please that he has called people to ''ban you a vandal'' for over 4 times on the page. That is certainly more than enough to draw a little attention to him (arbitration in the worst case?) -- +++$+++ Note please that he has called people to ''ban you a vandal'' for over 4 times on the page. That is certainly more than enough to draw a little attention to him (arbitration in the worst case?) --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 17:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
534830 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534829 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-06 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.144375920E09 +++$+++ About to leave work now, I shall log in in an hour or so. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::About to leave work now, I shall log in in an hour or so. Thanks, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 19:12, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

462990 +++$+++ Magiko +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 462990 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-30 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.264905780E09 +++$+++ Your help is very much appreciated. I don't know if I understand exactly all what you mean but I will try my best. The examples of other composers that you suggested will be a great help. I will be in touch when I have advanced a bit more. Thanks again.  +++$+++ Your help is very much appreciated. I don't know if I understand exactly all what you mean but I will try my best. The examples of other composers that you suggested will be a great help. I will be in touch when I have advanced a bit more. Thanks again. [[User:Magiko|Magiko]] ([[User talk:Magiko|talk]]) 18:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
462991 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 462990 +++$+++ 462990 +++$+++ 2010-01-30 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.264908660E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome.  +++$+++ :You are very welcome. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 19:31, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

10543 +++$+++ RFBailey +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10543 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-28 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.209433560E09 +++$+++ Please note that to create subpages, so should use a forward slash \"\/\", rather than a backward slash \"\\\".  I've fixed this with your user talk archives (hope you don't mind): recently a lot of these pages have been deleted (including one of your own user subpages).  Regards, -- +++$+++ Please note that to create subpages, so should use a forward slash "/", rather than a backward slash "\".  I've fixed this with your user talk archives (hope you don't mind): recently a lot of these pages have been deleted (including one of your own user subpages).  Regards, --[[User:RFBailey|RFBailey]] ([[User talk:RFBailey|talk]]) 18:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
10544 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10543 +++$+++ 10543 +++$+++ 2008-04-28 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.209434220E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the correction. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ : Thank you for the correction. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight\Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 18:57, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
10545 +++$+++ RFBailey +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10543 +++$+++ 10544 +++$+++ 2008-04-28 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.209435060E09 +++$+++ No problem.  Incidentally, the \"gothic\" link in your signature appears to be one of those which has bitten the dust already!  Oh dear.  -- +++$+++ ::No problem.  Incidentally, the "gothic" link in your signature appears to be one of those which has bitten the dust already!  Oh dear.  --[[User:RFBailey|RFBailey]] ([[User talk:RFBailey|talk]]) 19:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
10546 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10543 +++$+++ 10544 +++$+++ 2008-04-28 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.209438000E09 +++$+++ Thanks again. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :: Thanks again. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight/Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 20:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
10547 +++$+++ RFBailey +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10543 +++$+++ 10546 +++$+++ 2008-04-28 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.209443400E09 +++$+++ Oh, and you might want to get your [[User:MathKnight\\Gallery|Gallery]] fixed as well!  -- +++$+++ :::Oh, and you might want to get your [[User:MathKnight\Gallery|Gallery]] fixed as well!  --[[User:RFBailey|RFBailey]] ([[User talk:RFBailey|talk]]) 21:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

534833 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-11 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.144739700E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Stop_hand.svg|left|30px]] Please see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]] policy: <span style=\"font-size: 120%\"> '''There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them.'''<\/span> Comment on ''content'', not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for disruption. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Kosovo&diff=47876795&oldid=47856289]] Content of the personal attack \"Your behaviour is just not mature or adult-like at all\" Hope you apologize, and do not repeat your attacks in the future, or I shall ask for measures to be taken against you. Thank you,  +++$+++ [[Image:Stop_hand.svg|left|30px]] Please see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]] policy: <span style="font-size: 120%"> '''There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them.'''</span> Comment on ''content'', not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for disruption. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kosovo&diff=47876795&oldid=47856289]] Content of the personal attack "Your behaviour is just not mature or adult-like at all" Hope you apologize, and do not repeat your attacks in the future, or I shall ask for measures to be taken against you. Thank you, [[User:Ilir pz|Ilir pz]] 00:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
534834 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534833 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.144739940E09 +++$+++ Sorry, my friend, but this is not a personal attack. I was commenting on your contributions not on yourself, as explained several times in the [[Talk:Kosovo]] page. Cool down.  +++$+++ ::Sorry, my friend, but this is not a personal attack. I was commenting on your contributions not on yourself, as explained several times in the [[Talk:Kosovo]] page. Cool down. [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 00:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
534835 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534833 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.144740180E09 +++$+++ citing you: '''\"YOUR behaviour is just not mature or adult-like at all\"'''' No comment! +++$+++ :::citing you: '''"YOUR behaviour is just not mature or adult-like at all"'''' No comment![[User:Ilir pz|Ilir pz]] 00:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
534836 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534833 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.144740600E09 +++$+++ Refer to your own [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Ilir_pz&offset=20060404092353&limit=100 contributions], it has been noticed. End of the argument.  +++$+++ ::::Refer to your own [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Ilir_pz&offset=20060404092353&limit=100 contributions], it has been noticed. End of the argument. [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 00:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

10548 +++$+++ CarolSpears +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10548 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-19 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.211198760E09 +++$+++ There is much I don't understand. --  +++$+++ There is much I don't understand. -- [[User:CarolSpears|carol]] ([[User talk:CarolSpears|talk]]) 05:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
10549 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10548 +++$+++ 10548 +++$+++ 2008-05-20 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.211330220E09 +++$+++ Actually, I look like an ordinary man, wearing regular clothes and have regular black hair and beard. I'm Gothic in philosophy and art, not in look . '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ : Actually, I look like an ordinary man, wearing regular clothes and have regular black hair and beard. I'm Gothic in philosophy and art, not in look . '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight/Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 17:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

534837 +++$+++ Hipi Zhdripi +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-09 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.144631100E09 +++$+++ If you have a argument that Kosovo is representit in the Word with the serbian flage then give me, don t rev.-- +++$+++ If you have a argument that Kosovo is representit in the Word with the serbian flage then give me, don t rev.--[[User:Hipi Zhdripi|Hipi Zhdripi]] 18:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
534838 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534837 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-09 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.144631340E09 +++$+++ '''Provinces''' are represented by the flag of the state or country they belong to. Therefore, the flag of Serbia is right. Whether you like this or not is simply academic. This is an encyclopedia not a forum. Regards,  +++$+++ ::'''Provinces''' are represented by the flag of the state or country they belong to. Therefore, the flag of Serbia is right. Whether you like this or not is simply academic. This is an encyclopedia not a forum. Regards, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 18:09, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
534839 +++$+++ Hipi Zhdripi +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534837 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-09 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.144635360E09 +++$+++ I dont wont too hier the intepretation. Do you have a argument that Kosovo is representit in the Word with the serbian flage then give me. If you dont have dont rev. This hase nothing to do with forum.-- +++$+++ ::: I dont wont too hier the intepretation. Do you have a argument that Kosovo is representit in the Word with the serbian flage then give me. If you dont have dont rev. This hase nothing to do with forum.--[[User:Hipi Zhdripi|Hipi Zhdripi]] 19:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
534840 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534837 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-09 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.144634820E09 +++$+++ Hipi it is not worth arguing with these guys. Just ignore their inflamatory remarks. bye,  +++$+++ ::Hipi it is not worth arguing with these guys. Just ignore their inflamatory remarks. bye, [[User:Ilir pz|Ilir pz]] 19:07, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
534841 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534837 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-10 06:23:00 +++$+++ 1.144675380E09 +++$+++ I [[WP:DNFT|don't feed trolls]]. Best answer to inflamatory comments is to ignore them. You have shown no respect for other wikipedians and I hope you and your sockpuppets get banned soon. Any further revert on my talk page will be considered as vandalism and shall be reported as such. Good night,  +++$+++ :: I [[WP:DNFT|don't feed trolls]]. Best answer to inflamatory comments is to ignore them. You have shown no respect for other wikipedians and I hope you and your sockpuppets get banned soon. Any further revert on my talk page will be considered as vandalism and shall be reported as such. Good night, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 06:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

10550 +++$+++ Lodewijk Vadacchino +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-13 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.221336900E09 +++$+++ Good evening and regards from [[Campora San Giovanni]]. I write you regarding these two articles, if out of politeness you could translate them in Hebrew, two actors of a note concern European television series, but thanks to Rai International now with the new episodes of the 12 season they will be beautiful even more. I am speaking of the inspector Rex for better saying of their principal actors: Martin Weinek or Vainek, the veteran and Kaspar Capparoni, the new entry but very famous also in Israel. If you will help me in this I will translate you with pleasure some biography or geographical article in Spanish, French, Italian, Neapolitan and Sicilian, in how much in the Italian Wikipedia they are exactly biographer and geographer. In attends him of one certain answer of yours I send you the anticipated thanks and a regard from Campora San Giovanni, my village native. I thank you in advance-- +++$+++ Good evening and regards from [[Campora San Giovanni]]. I write you regarding these two articles, if out of politeness you could translate them in Hebrew, two actors of a note concern European television series, but thanks to Rai International now with the new episodes of the 12 season they will be beautiful even more. I am speaking of the inspector Rex for better saying of their principal actors: Martin Weinek or Vainek, the veteran and Kaspar Capparoni, the new entry but very famous also in Israel. If you will help me in this I will translate you with pleasure some biography or geographical article in Spanish, French, Italian, Neapolitan and Sicilian, in how much in the Italian Wikipedia they are exactly biographer and geographer. In attends him of one certain answer of yours I send you the anticipated thanks and a regard from Campora San Giovanni, my village native. I thank you in advance--[[User:Lodewijk Vadacchino|Lodewijk Vadacchino]] ([[User talk:Lodewijk Vadacchino|talk]]) 13:15, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
10551 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10550 +++$+++ 10550 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.221351360E09 +++$+++ I translated the two articles to Hebrew. You welcome. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ : I translated the two articles to Hebrew. You welcome. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight/Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 17:16, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

10554 +++$+++ Flayer +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-24 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.251141540E09 +++$+++ May I ask for your help with it, in case you are interested with the subject? Some native speakers say the article desperately needs a good copyedit, and unfortunately my English isn't good enough. Thanks in advance.  +++$+++ May I ask for your help with it, in case you are interested with the subject? Some native speakers say the article desperately needs a good copyedit, and unfortunately my English isn't good enough. Thanks in advance. [[User:Flayer|Flayer]] ([[User talk:Flayer|talk]]) 12:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
10555 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10554 +++$+++ 10554 +++$+++ 2009-08-24 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.251159720E09 +++$+++ I didn't see any notice about it (niether in the talk page). I'm niether a native English speaker but if you will be more specific I might be able to help. Also note I rarely visit the English Wikipedia so it is better you contact me in the Hebrew talk page: [[:he:\u05e9\u05d9\u05d7\u05ea \u05de\u05e9\u05ea\u05de\u05e9:MathKnight]]. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ : I didn't see any notice about it (niether in the talk page). I'm niether a native English speaker but if you will be more specific I might be able to help. Also note I rarely visit the English Wikipedia so it is better you contact me in the Hebrew talk page: [[:he:שיחת משתמש:MathKnight]]. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight/Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 17:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

526047 +++$+++ Murcielago +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526047 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-13 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.152785460E09 +++$+++ Yes, and the English article is pretty good.  What started me on this whole trail was that they are going to delete him from the '''Spanish''' wiki, [[http:\/\/es.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Rafael_Peralta]] and there doesn't seem to be anything we can do to stop it.  Unfortunately there aren't folks like you and Tony on that wiki.  - +++$+++ Yes, and the English article is pretty good.  What started me on this whole trail was that they are going to delete him from the '''Spanish''' wiki, [[http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Peralta]] and there doesn't seem to be anything we can do to stop it.  Unfortunately there aren't folks like you and Tony on that wiki.  -[[User:Murcielago|Murcielago]] 03:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
526048 +++$+++ Murcielago +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526047 +++$+++ 526047 +++$+++ 2006-07-14 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.152888240E09 +++$+++ Actually, it doesn't seem like the biography criteria are any different - it's just that there are lots of folks hostile to America is what it comes down to.  I (nuevomexicano on that page), and a fellow English-language wiki friend (Rockero) of mine and Tony's tried to put up an argument, but we got kyboshed because we hadn't contributed enough or been on Wiki Espa\xf1ol long enough to be able to vote (30 days or 100 edits).  They even ignored Rockero's well reasoned logic for why inclusion was proper.  The unintended benefit was that it got me interested in Peralta and that led me to Tony, which led to the MOH page that you and Tony have worked so hard on.  -- +++$+++ :Actually, it doesn't seem like the biography criteria are any different - it's just that there are lots of folks hostile to America is what it comes down to.  I (nuevomexicano on that page), and a fellow English-language wiki friend (Rockero) of mine and Tony's tried to put up an argument, but we got kyboshed because we hadn't contributed enough or been on Wiki Español long enough to be able to vote (30 days or 100 edits).  They even ignored Rockero's well reasoned logic for why inclusion was proper.  The unintended benefit was that it got me interested in Peralta and that led me to Tony, which led to the MOH page that you and Tony have worked so hard on.  --[[User:Murcielago|Murcielago]] 07:44, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

10556 +++$+++ ROG5728 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-12 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.273721400E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add content without citing [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] and [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|''reliable'' sources]], as you did to [[IMI Galil]]. Before making any potentially controversial [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|edits]], it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add content without citing [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] and [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|''reliable'' sources]], as you did to [[IMI Galil]]. Before making any potentially controversial [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|edits]], it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> [[User:ROG5728|ROG5728]] ([[User talk:ROG5728|talk]]) 20:30, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
10557 +++$+++  +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10556 +++$+++ 10556 +++$+++ 2010-05-12 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.273723560E09 +++$+++ [[IMI Galil]] can be seen on [[Knesset Guard]] officer (such as [[:File:Knesset Guard P5200034.JPG|here]] and [http:\/\/www.knesset.gov.il\/guard\/heb_html\/dept_honor_guardl_3.asp here] and [http:\/\/www.knesset.gov.il\/guard\/heb_html\/dept_perimeter_1.asp here]) but also anually in [[Independence Day (Israel)]] official ceremony on [[Mount Herzl]], where the officers march with bayoneted Galil rifles. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color=\"blue\">M<\/font><font color=\"black\">ath<\/font><font color=\"green\">K<\/font><font color=\"black\">night<\/font>]]''' <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ : [[IMI Galil]] can be seen on [[Knesset Guard]] officer (such as [[:File:Knesset Guard P5200034.JPG|here]] and [http://www.knesset.gov.il/guard/heb_html/dept_honor_guardl_3.asp here] and [http://www.knesset.gov.il/guard/heb_html/dept_perimeter_1.asp here]) but also anually in [[Independence Day (Israel)]] official ceremony on [[Mount Herzl]], where the officers march with bayoneted Galil rifles. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]''' <font color="blue">[[User:MathKnight/Gothic|Gothic]] [[Israel]]i [[Jew]]</font> 21:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

534845 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-09 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.144635180E09 +++$+++ A kind remark, Asterion!!! Stop reverting the template of Kosovo with Serbia's flag. You wouldn't like if we edit in Serbian wiki pages, would you? so please leave sites that have to do with Kosovo and Albanians alone, and don't vandalize, before it is too late. Keep exchanging barnstars with HRE, and have fun in your Serbian wiki sites, instead.  +++$+++ A kind remark, Asterion!!! Stop reverting the template of Kosovo with Serbia's flag. You wouldn't like if we edit in Serbian wiki pages, would you? so please leave sites that have to do with Kosovo and Albanians alone, and don't vandalize, before it is too late. Keep exchanging barnstars with HRE, and have fun in your Serbian wiki sites, instead. [[User:Ilir pz|Ilir pz]] 19:13, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
534846 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534845 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-10 06:23:00 +++$+++ 1.144675380E09 +++$+++ I [[WP:DNFT|don't feed trolls]]. Best answer to inflamatory comments is to ignore them. You have shown no respect for other wikipedians and I hope you and your sockpuppets get banned soon. Good night,  +++$+++ :: I [[WP:DNFT|don't feed trolls]]. Best answer to inflamatory comments is to ignore them. You have shown no respect for other wikipedians and I hope you and your sockpuppets get banned soon. Good night, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 06:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

10558 +++$+++ Telaviv1 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-22 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.274576700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Telaviv1|Telaviv1]] ([[User talk:Telaviv1|talk]]) 18:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
10559 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10558 +++$+++ 10558 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.274738700E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, I am short of time either. I was absent from the EnWiki along time so I don't know all the policies and their initials nicknames (RS, RSN etc). I also noticed that every addition to an article is needed to be backuped by English reliable source, however I know mainly Hebrew sources (such as [[Ben-Dror Yemini]] who writes in Hebrew, though some of his articles are translated to English). To built it down from scratch - I thik it is too big on me, but I can help in certain points. ''' +++$+++ : Unfortunately, I am short of time either. I was absent from the EnWiki along time so I don't know all the policies and their initials nicknames (RS, RSN etc). I also noticed that every addition to an article is needed to be backuped by English reliable source, however I know mainly Hebrew sources (such as [[Ben-Dror Yemini]] who writes in Hebrew, though some of his articles are translated to English). To built it down from scratch - I thik it is too big on me, but I can help in certain points. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]'''  15:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

272703 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272703 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-18 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.155907500E09 +++$+++ You're going to accept I presume? ''' +++$+++ You're going to accept I presume? '''[[User:Blnguyen|Blnguyen]]''' <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[User talk:Blnguyen|rant-line]] 06:25, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
272704 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272703 +++$+++ 272703 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.156075260E09 +++$+++ I came to your talk page to ask of you if you'd ever considered becoming an administrator here at Wikipedia? I then discovered this heading addressing my exact question, and wondered if something was already afoot? I'd be happy to nominate you if it hasn't already occured. --  +++$+++ :I came to your talk page to ask of you if you'd ever considered becoming an administrator here at Wikipedia? I then discovered this heading addressing my exact question, and wondered if something was already afoot? I'd be happy to nominate you if it hasn't already occured. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 05:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
272705 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272703 +++$+++ 272704 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 05:16:00 +++$+++ 1.156076160E09 +++$+++ I think you'd make a fine administrator, and will let what's already evolved run its' course. I do hope you decide to accept. Be sure to let me know once your request is online so I can lend my support. --  +++$+++ ::I think you'd make a fine administrator, and will let what's already evolved run its' course. I do hope you decide to accept. Be sure to let me know once your request is online so I can lend my support. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 05:16, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

10560 +++$+++ Misarxist +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-14 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.276546440E09 +++$+++ Blanket reverting because you have a problem with one of the changes someone made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=IHH_(%C4%B0nsani_Yard%C4%B1m_Vakf%C4%B1)&curid=21439581&diff=367956993&oldid=367953396] isn't very helpful. Please review the discussion of the sources in question and engage in discussion. Thanx  +++$+++ Blanket reverting because you have a problem with one of the changes someone made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IHH_(%C4%B0nsani_Yard%C4%B1m_Vakf%C4%B1)&curid=21439581&diff=367956993&oldid=367953396] isn't very helpful. Please review the discussion of the sources in question and engage in discussion. Thanx [[User:Misarxist|Misarxist]] ([[User talk:Misarxist|talk]]) 13:14, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
10561 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10560 +++$+++ 10560 +++$+++ 2010-06-14 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.276550400E09 +++$+++ I briefed over the talk page but didn't found any arguments or decision for removing the DIIS source. Please point me to such discussion. ''' +++$+++ : I briefed over the talk page but didn't found any arguments or decision for removing the DIIS source. Please point me to such discussion. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]'''  14:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

541552 +++$+++ Pinaki ghosh +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-14 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.181809380E09 +++$+++ Like this article [[Susnato Chowdhury]], the other article created by the same user [[Susnato]] also needs to go for speedy deletion. Can you help? -- +++$+++ Like this article [[Susnato Chowdhury]], the other article created by the same user [[Susnato]] also needs to go for speedy deletion. Can you help? --[[User:Pinaki ghosh|Pinaki ghosh]] 01:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
541553 +++$+++ Pinaki ghosh +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541552 +++$+++ 541552 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.181810340E09 +++$+++ Thanks dear -- +++$+++ : Thanks dear --[[User:Pinaki ghosh|Pinaki ghosh]] 01:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

534851 +++$+++ AmiDaniel +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-11 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.144751220E09 +++$+++ ==Welcome to [[User:AmiDaniel\/VandalProof|VandalProof]]== Thanks for your interest in VandalProof! You've been added to the list of authorized users, and feel free to contact me or post a message on [[User talk:AmiDaniel\/VandalProof|VandalProof's talk page]] if you have any questions.  +++$+++ ==Welcome to [[User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof|VandalProof]]== Thanks for your interest in VandalProof! You've been added to the list of authorized users, and feel free to contact me or post a message on [[User talk:AmiDaniel/VandalProof|VandalProof's talk page]] if you have any questions. [[User:AmiDaniel|AmiDaniel]] ([[User talk:AmiDaniel|Talk]]) 03:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
534852 +++$+++ AmiDaniel +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534851 +++$+++ 534851 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.144790880E09 +++$+++ In light of your recent edit warring regarding the [[Kosovo]] article, I've decided it best to place a slight hold on your approval. If you'd still like to use VandalProof, please resubmit your name on Monday, 17 Apr 06, or contact me on my talk page if you believe I've made a mistake. Thanks.  +++$+++ :In light of your recent edit warring regarding the [[Kosovo]] article, I've decided it best to place a slight hold on your approval. If you'd still like to use VandalProof, please resubmit your name on Monday, 17 Apr 06, or contact me on my talk page if you believe I've made a mistake. Thanks. [[User:AmiDaniel|AmiDaniel]] ([[User talk:AmiDaniel|Talk]]) 14:28, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
534853 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534851 +++$+++ 534852 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.144819800E09 +++$+++ Hi AmiDaniel, refer to your talk page. I just left a message about this. The user who made the accusations against me has just been blocked for repeated edit disruptions once again. I am refraining from further engagement with him as arbitration is sadly the only option left. Best regards,  +++$+++ ::Hi AmiDaniel, refer to your talk page. I just left a message about this. The user who made the accusations against me has just been blocked for repeated edit disruptions once again. I am refraining from further engagement with him as arbitration is sadly the only option left. Best regards, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 22:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
534854 +++$+++ AmiDaniel +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534851 +++$+++ 534853 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.144852200E09 +++$+++ Hey, I'm really sorry about this. I've been *extremely* stressed this week with real-life stuff and I've been devoting all of my freetime (and much of my not-so-free time) to Wikipedia, so I've kind of been a little rash in my decisions lately. Unfortunately, there's some db bug with Wikipedia right now and I don't seem to be able to lift the restriction tag on you, but you're now on the list again, so it shouldn't matter whether the tags are in place or not. Again, I'm sorry, but maybe you could use this event (which I think could probably also be deemed trolling) to back you up in the AbCom? Anyway, please contact me if you have problems getting on and I'll try to sort them out... you should, however, now be on the approved list.  +++$+++ :::Hey, I'm really sorry about this. I've been *extremely* stressed this week with real-life stuff and I've been devoting all of my freetime (and much of my not-so-free time) to Wikipedia, so I've kind of been a little rash in my decisions lately. Unfortunately, there's some db bug with Wikipedia right now and I don't seem to be able to lift the restriction tag on you, but you're now on the list again, so it shouldn't matter whether the tags are in place or not. Again, I'm sorry, but maybe you could use this event (which I think could probably also be deemed trolling) to back you up in the AbCom? Anyway, please contact me if you have problems getting on and I'll try to sort them out... you should, however, now be on the approved list. [[User:AmiDaniel|AmiDaniel]] ([[User talk:AmiDaniel|Talk]]) 07:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
534855 +++$+++ AmiDaniel +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534851 +++$+++ 534854 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.145064900E09 +++$+++ I'm hopefully going to have a working install for 1.0.1 (which I think might actually be 1.1.0) ready for download either tomorrow of or Sunday. That should fix your problems with unsigned system files. You are on the authorized list; are you sure that you are signed in as Asterion in Wikipedia within VP's browser? Try clicking on \"Sign In \/ Create an account\" and logging in as Asterion. VP uses the IE rendering enginge, so you'll need to be logged in in IE for it to work.  +++$+++ ::::I'm hopefully going to have a working install for 1.0.1 (which I think might actually be 1.1.0) ready for download either tomorrow of or Sunday. That should fix your problems with unsigned system files. You are on the authorized list; are you sure that you are signed in as Asterion in Wikipedia within VP's browser? Try clicking on "Sign In / Create an account" and logging in as Asterion. VP uses the IE rendering enginge, so you'll need to be logged in in IE for it to work. [[User:AmiDaniel|AmiDaniel]] ([[User talk:AmiDaniel|Talk]]) 18:35, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
534856 +++$+++ AmiDaniel +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534851 +++$+++ 534855 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.145072040E09 +++$+++ Hm... This may be a result of your Wikipedia skin. Try changing it to monobook (if you haven't already) and see if that fixes it.  +++$+++ :::::Hm... This may be a result of your Wikipedia skin. Try changing it to monobook (if you haven't already) and see if that fixes it. [[User:AmiDaniel|AmiDaniel]] ([[User talk:AmiDaniel|Talk]]) 20:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

10564 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-19 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.279578060E09 +++$+++ I can't tell you, off hand. I am trying to think of an example, and can't.  +++$+++ I can't tell you, off hand. I am trying to think of an example, and can't. [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 15:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
10565 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10564 +++$+++ 10564 +++$+++ 2010-07-23 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.279904640E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I just read your post again. I must have been half asleep. Yes, of course, Prague and St Ouen. I would say Yes.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I just read your post again. I must have been half asleep. Yes, of course, Prague and St Ouen. I would say Yes. [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 10:04, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
10566 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10564 +++$+++ 10565 +++$+++ 2010-07-23 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.279925820E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the answer. ''' +++$+++ :: Thank you for the answer. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]'''  15:57, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

272709 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272709 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-21 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.156150860E09 +++$+++ One thing to move the \"aboriginal name\" (which begs more questions than answers) from the much vandalised mania to the south, it seemed at least a talk page item, no?  +++$+++ One thing to move the "aboriginal name" (which begs more questions than answers) from the much vandalised mania to the south, it seemed at least a talk page item, no? [[User:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 02:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
272710 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272709 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.156153680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply.  Yes a quandary. I'll let it rest. If you are interested in tas things, maybe Cape Barren Island is worth putting on your watchlist, you'll understand when you check it  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your reply.  Yes a quandary. I'll let it rest. If you are interested in tas things, maybe Cape Barren Island is worth putting on your watchlist, you'll understand when you check it [[User:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 02:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
272711 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272709 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.156154580E09 +++$+++ I was thinking that the uninvited unsigned talk on front of article page needed monitoring just in case he came back again :), and also the article in general needs a cleanup, I just didnt want to be the only editor watching if he did come back, so i have alerted a few others including admins :)  +++$+++ ::I was thinking that the uninvited unsigned talk on front of article page needed monitoring just in case he came back again :), and also the article in general needs a cleanup, I just didnt want to be the only editor watching if he did come back, so i have alerted a few others including admins :) [[User:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 03:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
272712 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272709 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.156158480E09 +++$+++ At least we're not dealing with the 'Bass Strait Triangle' in this art :) sigh  +++$+++ ::At least we're not dealing with the 'Bass Strait Triangle' in this art :) sigh [[User:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 04:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

10569 +++$+++ Jmundo +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10569 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-10 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.297325640E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->  +++$+++ If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> [[User:Jmundo|Jmundo]] ([[User talk:Jmundo|talk]]) 00:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
10570 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10569 +++$+++ 10569 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.297384980E09 +++$+++ I add a non-free image rational template and info, is it OK now? ''' +++$+++ : I add a non-free image rational template and info, is it OK now? '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]'''  16:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

272715 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272715 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-24 08:44:00 +++$+++ 1.156434240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for stepping in and helping out with this!   +++$+++ Thanks for stepping in and helping out with this!  [[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] 08:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
272716 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272715 +++$+++ 272715 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 09:27:00 +++$+++ 1.156436820E09 +++$+++ ...and again, thanks.  I'm afraid I have an unfortunate urge to try to talk sense into people like this, but most of the time reason just makes them worse.  I'll stop responding to him now.  -- +++$+++ * ...and again, thanks.  I'm afraid I have an unfortunate urge to try to talk sense into people like this, but most of the time reason just makes them worse.  I'll stop responding to him now.  --[[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] 09:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

10572 +++$+++ שדדשכ +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10572 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311222360E09 +++$+++ \u05e8\u05d5\u05e6\u05d9\u05dd \u05dc\u05de\u05d7\u05d5\u05e7 \u05d0\u05ea \u05d4\u05e2\u05e8\u05da \u05d1\u05d2\u05dc\u05dc \u05d4\u05e2\u05d3\u05e8 \u05de\u05e7\u05d5\u05e8\u05d5\u05ea. \u05d0\u05e0\u05d9 \u05dc\u05d0 \u05d9\u05db\u05d5\u05dc \u05dc\u05d4\u05d5\u05e1\u05d9\u05e3 \u05d1\u05d2\u05dc\u05dc \u05ea\u05e7\u05dc\u05d4, \u05d4\u05d0\u05dd \u05ea\u05d5\u05db\u05dc \u05dc\u05d4\u05d5\u05e1\u05d9\u05e3 \u05d0\u05d5\u05ea\u05dd? \u05e4\u05d9\u05e8\u05d8\u05ea\u05d9 \u05d0\u05d5\u05ea\u05dd [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:SunCreator&diff=prev&oldid=440188496 \u05e4\u05d4] \u05ea\u05d5\u05d3\u05d4  +++$+++ רוצים למחוק את הערך בגלל העדר מקורות. אני לא יכול להוסיף בגלל תקלה, האם תוכל להוסיף אותם? פירטתי אותם [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SunCreator&diff=prev&oldid=440188496 פה] תודה [[User:שדדשכ|שדדשכ]] ([[User talk:שדדשכ|talk]]) 21:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
10573 +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ MathKnight +++$+++ 10572 +++$+++ 10572 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.311265920E09 +++$+++ Done. ''' +++$+++ : Done. '''[[User:MathKnight|<font color="blue">M</font><font color="black">ath</font><font color="green">K</font><font color="black">night</font>]]'''  09:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

272717 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272717 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-24 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.156452120E09 +++$+++ lol - you were quick tonight with your reverts. He always give himself away with the line \"Sydney is famous for its ''culture''  +++$+++ lol - you were quick tonight with your reverts. He always give himself away with the line "Sydney is famous for its ''culture'' [[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 13:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
272718 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272717 +++$+++ 272717 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.156582440E09 +++$+++ ha ha, Jackp calls me a jerk. Must mean i (and others like me) are doing something right!.  +++$+++ : ha ha, Jackp calls me a jerk. Must mean i (and others like me) are doing something right!. [[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 01:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

10574 +++$+++ Danielfolsom +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10574 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-15 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.171536060E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I know you don't know me, but I frequently go to a user's talk page, and after seeing your name helping them out on a vast majority of the ones I've been on today (not to mention the amazing quality and thoroughness of the aforementioned comments), I really think you deserve this. <font style=\"font-family:Papyrus; font-size:6px;\">'''Daniel()Folsom'''<\/font> [[User talk:Danielfolsom|<sup>T<\/sup>]]|[[Special:Contributions\/Danielfolsom|<sub>C<\/sub>]]| +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I know you don't know me, but I frequently go to a user's talk page, and after seeing your name helping them out on a vast majority of the ones I've been on today (not to mention the amazing quality and thoroughness of the aforementioned comments), I really think you deserve this. <font style="font-family:Papyrus; font-size:6px;">'''Daniel()Folsom'''</font> [[User talk:Danielfolsom|<sup>T</sup>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Danielfolsom|<sub>C</sub>]]|[[User:Danielfolsom|<sup>U</sup>]] 02:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
10575 +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10574 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-15 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.171545420E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I appreciate it.  I don't remember the exact discussion you refer to, but I assume it was about using small caps.  Formatting a word in small caps (like <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps;\">Wikipedia<\/span>) can be done using the code <code><nowiki><span style=\"font-variant:small-caps;\">Wikipedia<\/span><\/nowiki><\/code>.  But we can also use a template for this now: <code><nowiki>{{Smallcaps|Wikipedia}}<\/nowiki><\/code>.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::Thank you, I appreciate it.  I don't remember the exact discussion you refer to, but I assume it was about using small caps.  Formatting a word in small caps (like <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Wikipedia</span>) can be done using the code <code><nowiki><span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Wikipedia</span></nowiki></code>.  But we can also use a template for this now: <code><nowiki>{{Smallcaps|Wikipedia}}</nowiki></code>.  —[[User:Moverton|Mike]] 05:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

272719 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-25 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.156513440E09 +++$+++ You're smart (or a ''Buffy'' fan...). It's blocked indefinitely now. Ta!  +++$+++ You're smart (or a ''Buffy'' fan...). It's blocked indefinitely now. Ta! [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 06:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
272720 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272719 +++$+++ 272719 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.156545720E09 +++$+++ I left this editor a message about his unacceptable badgering of you. -- +++$+++ : I left this editor a message about his unacceptable badgering of you. --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 15:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
272721 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272719 +++$+++ 272720 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.156547700E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. We're all in this together! Still thinking about RfA? ;) -- +++$+++ ::You're welcome. We're all in this together! Still thinking about RfA? ;) --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 16:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
272722 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272719 +++$+++ 272721 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.156548360E09 +++$+++ Well, in that case let me thank you for '''your''' support. That was a lovely thing to say, even if I did fish for it somewhat! In all seriousness, and with no disrespect to the individual opposers, I wonder if the RfA process may need a re-examination? I feel like  I'm on the rack here... which was the fear that held me back from accepting the nom in the first place. On the other hand, I've been heartened by some of the (to me) surprising support votes. Oh well, and I'm not quite down yet I suppose. -- +++$+++ :::Well, in that case let me thank you for '''your''' support. That was a lovely thing to say, even if I did fish for it somewhat! In all seriousness, and with no disrespect to the individual opposers, I wonder if the RfA process may need a re-examination? I feel like  I'm on the rack here... which was the fear that held me back from accepting the nom in the first place. On the other hand, I've been heartened by some of the (to me) surprising support votes. Oh well, and I'm not quite down yet I suppose. --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 16:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

10576 +++$+++ Ksy92003 +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-24 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.174795920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ksy92003|<font color=green><b>Ksy92003</b></font>]] <sup>[[User Talk:Ksy92003|<font color=gray>talk</font>]]<b>·</b>[[Special:Contributions/Ksy92003|<font color=gray>contribs</font>]]</sup></font> 21:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
10577 +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10576 +++$+++ 10576 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.174796400E09 +++$+++ If you look closely at the edit history for that article you will see that someone else did a cut-and-paste move of the article.  I was simply moving the discussion material to the new article's location to keep it together.  But I doubt you looked that close at it.  As for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball\/MLB team season articles format]], it doesn't provide a template for the articles.  Projects like [[Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. counties]] provide an actual template as a ''guideline'' for article creation.  (I stress the word ''guideline''.) \u2014 +++$+++ :If you look closely at the edit history for that article you will see that someone else did a cut-and-paste move of the article.  I was simply moving the discussion material to the new article's location to keep it together.  But I doubt you looked that close at it.  As for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/MLB team season articles format]], it doesn't provide a template for the articles.  Projects like [[Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. counties]] provide an actual template as a ''guideline'' for article creation.  (I stress the word ''guideline''.) —[[User:Moverton|Mike]] 21:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
10578 +++$+++ Ksy92003 +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10576 +++$+++ 10577 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.174796880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Ksy92003|<font color=green><b>Ksy92003</b></font>]] <sup>[[User Talk:Ksy92003|<font color=gray>talk</font>]]<b>·</b>[[Special:Contributions/Ksy92003|<font color=gray>contribs</font>]]</sup></font> 21:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
10579 +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10576 +++$+++ 10578 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.174797480E09 +++$+++ If you are worried about uniformity I'd be happy to go through and add a \"Transactions\" section to each article.  But as a general rule, I don't add section titles unless I have material to include in that section.  Plus I don't care to maintain 30 articles. The purpose of these articles shouldn't be to just create a stats sheet and game log.  Adding relevant material related to the season is not forbidden.  Furthermore, if all you need is for the word \"Transactions\" to appear somewhere on that page you are citing, I'd be happy to add that (and a few other things I'll likely think of). \u2014 +++$+++ :::If you are worried about uniformity I'd be happy to go through and add a "Transactions" section to each article.  But as a general rule, I don't add section titles unless I have material to include in that section.  Plus I don't care to maintain 30 articles. The purpose of these articles shouldn't be to just create a stats sheet and game log.  Adding relevant material related to the season is not forbidden.  Furthermore, if all you need is for the word "Transactions" to appear somewhere on that page you are citing, I'd be happy to add that (and a few other things I'll likely think of). —[[User:Moverton|Mike]] 21:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
10580 +++$+++ Ksy92003 +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10576 +++$+++ 10579 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.174797960E09 +++$+++ [[User:Ksy92003|<font color=green><b>Ksy92003<\/b><\/font>]] <sup>[[User Talk:Ksy92003|<font color=gray>talk<\/font>]]<b>\xb7<\/b>[[Special:Contributions\/Ksy92003|<font color=gray>contribs<\/font>]]<\/sup><\/font>  +++$+++ ::::[[User:Ksy92003|<font color=green><b>Ksy92003</b></font>]] <sup>[[User Talk:Ksy92003|<font color=gray>talk</font>]]<b>·</b>[[Special:Contributions/Ksy92003|<font color=gray>contribs</font>]]</sup></font> [[User:Ksy92003|Ksy92003]] 21:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
10581 +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10576 +++$+++ 10580 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.174819260E09 +++$+++ I do understand.  The problem as it seems to me is that you think you own the project and that all the seaon articles have to conform to some sort of rigid format which apparently has never taken into consideration the format of existing season articles.  (The Minnesota Twins have an article for every year and their articles do include notable transactions.)  In all this fuss you have never once given me a reason why notable transactions should not be added.  And simply saying \"because I don't see it on such-and-such page\" doesn't count.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::I do understand.  The problem as it seems to me is that you think you own the project and that all the seaon articles have to conform to some sort of rigid format which apparently has never taken into consideration the format of existing season articles.  (The Minnesota Twins have an article for every year and their articles do include notable transactions.)  In all this fuss you have never once given me a reason why notable transactions should not be added.  And simply saying "because I don't see it on such-and-such page" doesn't count.  —[[User:Moverton|Mike]] 03:41, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

534866 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-14 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.145018940E09 +++$+++ Hi, I found one of your edits a bit confusing, could you please reply at [[Talk:Spanish Civil War chronology 1937]]? Thanks. -  +++$+++ Hi, I found one of your edits a bit confusing, could you please reply at [[Talk:Spanish Civil War chronology 1937]]? Thanks. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 05:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
534867 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534866 +++$+++ 534866 +++$+++ 2006-04-17 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.145275440E09 +++$+++ I've responded to you again there. -  +++$+++ : I've responded to you again there. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 05:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
534868 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534866 +++$+++ 534866 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.145137380E09 +++$+++ Please deal with other contributions in a polite and constructive manner.  Rude behavior is discouraged by Wikipedia policies.  See [[Wikipedia:Civility]].  Thank you. Regards,  +++$+++ :Please deal with other contributions in a polite and constructive manner.  Rude behavior is discouraged by Wikipedia policies.  See [[Wikipedia:Civility]].  Thank you. Regards, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 14:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

272723 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-26 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.156616040E09 +++$+++ Bainer, could you please look at [[User:- 40]], [[User:- 41]] and [[User:- 42]]? They're [[User:Pnatt]] socks\/impersonators. I reported it at AIV, but no one seems to be around and as you can see, he's rampaging through Australian articles converting CBD > downtown. Cheers,  +++$+++ Bainer, could you please look at [[User:- 40]], [[User:- 41]] and [[User:- 42]]? They're [[User:Pnatt]] socks/impersonators. I reported it at AIV, but no one seems to be around and as you can see, he's rampaging through Australian articles converting CBD > downtown. Cheers, [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 11:14, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
272724 +++$+++ Thebainer +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272723 +++$+++ 272723 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.156617120E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I noticed those, and figured they were all socks of each other, although I didn't know who the puppeteer was. I've blocked those three for the time being, and there's a case now filed at [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Pnatt (2nd)]] if you have any more to add. -- +++$+++ :Yeah, I noticed those, and figured they were all socks of each other, although I didn't know who the puppeteer was. I've blocked those three for the time being, and there's a case now filed at [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pnatt (2nd)]] if you have any more to add. --[[User:Thebainer|bainer]] ([[User_talk:Thebainer|talk]]) 11:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
272725 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272723 +++$+++ 272724 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.156617420E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I just added {{user|- 38}} and {{user|- 39}}. - 39 has been blocked but -38 hasn't yet. I hope he doesn't have another 37 of these to cycle through. :\/ Thanks, Bainer.  +++$+++ ::Thanks, I just added {{user|- 38}} and {{user|- 39}}. - 39 has been blocked but -38 hasn't yet. I hope he doesn't have another 37 of these to cycle through. :/ Thanks, Bainer. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 11:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
272726 +++$+++ Thebainer +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272723 +++$+++ 272725 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.156618380E09 +++$+++ That one's blocked too now. Hopefully the autoblock will hit him soon, although given the sheer number of socks he probably has a dynamic IP. A checkuser may be in order. -- +++$+++ :::That one's blocked too now. Hopefully the autoblock will hit him soon, although given the sheer number of socks he probably has a dynamic IP. A checkuser may be in order. --[[User:Thebainer|bainer]] ([[User_talk:Thebainer|talk]]) 11:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

534869 +++$+++ Elephantus +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534869 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-15 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.145146500E09 +++$+++ Please, when doing such things, try to gather more information about the incidents in question. Posting frivolous comments such as this one without any further explanations can often be counter-productive. Also, I suggest a re-reading of [[WP:NPOV]], especially the section titled \"Undue weight\". You seem to be interested in a number of topics about former Yugoslavia. Many of these topics are very complex and I would recommend researching them well before trying to tackle sensitive subjects. Regards, -- +++$+++ Please, when doing such things, try to gather more information about the incidents in question. Posting frivolous comments such as this one without any further explanations can often be counter-productive. Also, I suggest a re-reading of [[WP:NPOV]], especially the section titled "Undue weight". You seem to be interested in a number of topics about former Yugoslavia. Many of these topics are very complex and I would recommend researching them well before trying to tackle sensitive subjects. Regards, --[[User:Elephantus|Elephantus]] 17:15, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
534870 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534869 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.145146680E09 +++$+++ You should take the advise at face value. It is a call to civility, to respect other wikipedians views. You simply have to check your own contribution history to realise what I mean. See [[Talk:Serbia]] for further examples. As for \"researching well before trying to tackle sensitive subjects\", I certainly do, thank you very much.   +++$+++ ::You should take the advise at face value. It is a call to civility, to respect other wikipedians views. You simply have to check your own contribution history to realise what I mean. See [[Talk:Serbia]] for further examples. As for "researching well before trying to tackle sensitive subjects", I certainly do, thank you very much.  [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 17:18, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
534871 +++$+++ Elephantus +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534869 +++$+++ 534869 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.145147400E09 +++$+++ I would be most grateful if you provided me with specific examples of uncivility or rude behaviour on my part. I find unfounded accusations of uncivility because people happen to disgree with your POV a bit problematic. -- +++$+++ :I would be most grateful if you provided me with specific examples of uncivility or rude behaviour on my part. I find unfounded accusations of uncivility because people happen to disgree with your POV a bit problematic. --[[User:Elephantus|Elephantus]] 17:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
534872 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534869 +++$+++ 534871 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.145151300E09 +++$+++ Calling people a [[Internet Troll|Troll]] because they happen to disagree with your POV is not the best way to make friends. You may have your differences with them (and I agree with [[User:HolyRomanEmperor]]'s [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AElephantus&diff=48581579&oldid=48570308 views on Primadol], anyway), but it does not help a great deal. In any case, I was simply offering some advise. It was not a warning, but a civility ready-made template. Take it if you want. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Calling people a [[Internet Troll|Troll]] because they happen to disagree with your POV is not the best way to make friends. You may have your differences with them (and I agree with [[User:HolyRomanEmperor]]'s [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AElephantus&diff=48581579&oldid=48570308 views on Primadol], anyway), but it does not help a great deal. In any case, I was simply offering some advise. It was not a warning, but a civility ready-made template. Take it if you want. Regards, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 18:35, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
534873 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534869 +++$+++ 534872 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.145158860E09 +++$+++ Elephantus, the user you have the dispute <small>([[Wikipedia:Remove personal attacks|Personal attack removed]])<!-- Template:RPA --><\/small>.  +++$+++ :::Elephantus, the user you have the dispute <small>([[Wikipedia:Remove personal attacks|Personal attack removed]])<!-- Template:RPA --></small>. [[User:Ilir pz|Ilir pz]] 20:41, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
534874 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534869 +++$+++ 534873 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.145166540E09 +++$+++ You should better start following Wikipedia's [[WP:NPA|no personal attacks]] policy. Personal attacks are '''[[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|not allowed]]''' on Wikipedia.  +++$+++ ::::You should better start following Wikipedia's [[WP:NPA|no personal attacks]] policy. Personal attacks are '''[[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|not allowed]]''' on Wikipedia. [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 22:49, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

10582 +++$+++ Ksy92003 +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-28 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.175151000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ksy92003|<font color=green><b>Ksy92003</b></font>]] <sup>[[User Talk:Ksy92003|<font color=gray>talk</font>]]<b>·</b>[[Special:Contributions/Ksy92003|<font color=gray>contribs</font>]]</sup></font> 23:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
10583 +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10582 +++$+++ 10582 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.175258760E09 +++$+++ As you can probably guess, Mike is my first name.  \u2014 +++$+++ :As you can probably guess, Mike is my first name.  —[[User:Moverton|Mike]] 05:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

10588 +++$+++ Timneu22 +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10588 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-02 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.194044940E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you made things calculate automatically (and I trust you've tested it!). Shouldn't we update the [[:Template:Infobox U.S. County\/doc]] to not show the unneeded variables, then?  +++$+++ I'm glad you made things calculate automatically (and I trust you've tested it!). Shouldn't we update the [[:Template:Infobox U.S. County/doc]] to not show the unneeded variables, then? [[User:Timneu22|Timneu22]] 16:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
10589 +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10588 +++$+++ 10588 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.194067980E09 +++$+++ I figured I'd let someone else do that work.  ;) \u2014 +++$+++ :I figured I'd let someone else do that work.  ;) —[[User:Moverton|Mike]] 22:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

613434 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-01 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.228184040E09 +++$+++ Dave, [[User:I B Wright]] is back after a lengthy absence and has made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Signalhead&diff=255219126&oldid=248501106 this unprovoked attack] on my talk page (it was quickly reverted by an anonymous user). I consider this to be harassment. \u2013 +++$+++ Dave, [[User:I B Wright]] is back after a lengthy absence and has made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Signalhead&diff=255219126&oldid=248501106 this unprovoked attack] on my talk page (it was quickly reverted by an anonymous user). I consider this to be harassment. –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 18:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
613435 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613434 +++$+++ 613434 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.228190160E09 +++$+++ As you've seen, I've added a helpful reminder to IB's talk page. Since you've felt the need to address the substance of IB's assertions, you'll appreciate the need to take care to avoid confrontation and hopefully let IB realise the need for civility. . .  +++$+++ :As you've seen, I've added a helpful reminder to IB's talk page. Since you've felt the need to address the substance of IB's assertions, you'll appreciate the need to take care to avoid confrontation and hopefully let IB realise the need for civility. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
613436 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613434 +++$+++ 613435 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.228193700E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks. \u2013 +++$+++ ::OK, thanks. –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font  color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 20:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
613437 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613434 +++$+++ 613436 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.228703220E09 +++$+++ Yet more [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Signalhead&diff=prev&oldid=256454147 harassment and threats] from IBW. \u2013 +++$+++ :::Yet more [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Signalhead&diff=prev&oldid=256454147 harassment and threats] from IBW. –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 18:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
613438 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613434 +++$+++ 613437 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.228775640E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&oldid=256465234#User:I_B_Wright Tedious]. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC) ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&oldid=256623264#User:I_B_Wright for the record]) .  +++$+++ ::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=256465234#User:I_B_Wright Tedious]. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC) ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=256623264#User:I_B_Wright for the record]) . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 14:34, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
613439 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613434 +++$+++ 613438 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.228706640E09 +++$+++ Yes, it's tedious. Thanks for your swift intervention.\u2013 +++$+++ :::::Yes, it's tedious. Thanks for your swift intervention.–[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 19:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
613440 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613434 +++$+++ 613439 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.228707120E09 +++$+++ I'd just advise against trying to explain yourself to IBW, it's liable to be misunderstood or taken amiss. .  +++$+++ ::::::I'd just advise against trying to explain yourself to IBW, it's liable to be misunderstood or taken amiss. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
613441 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613434 +++$+++ 613440 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.228707420E09 +++$+++ I was thinking the same.\u2013 +++$+++ :::::::I was thinking the same.–[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 19:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

272735 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.156896600E09 +++$+++ Do you like my new warning for modern art spamlinks? See [[User_talk:Emmarella]]. --  +++$+++ Do you like my new warning for modern art spamlinks? See [[User_talk:Emmarella]]. -- [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 17:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
272736 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272735 +++$+++ 272735 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.156897860E09 +++$+++ Ta! No I hadn't noticed. Good job someone knows what's happening on my user page. I think probably more by luck than judgement it has dropped into quite a neat position. Why do such templates have a life of their own? I noticed your neat tweak to the lead section on DeBarra Mayo. Of course, you dooooooo understand I just hacked it into shape quickly and would never of course repeat the same word normally in such proximity etc!!! :)  +++$+++ :Ta! No I hadn't noticed. Good job someone knows what's happening on my user page. I think probably more by luck than judgement it has dropped into quite a neat position. Why do such templates have a life of their own? I noticed your neat tweak to the lead section on DeBarra Mayo. Of course, you dooooooo understand I just hacked it into shape quickly and would never of course repeat the same word normally in such proximity etc!!! :) [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 17:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

272737 +++$+++ X1987x +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.156920480E09 +++$+++ Will you vote to keep [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Chumby]] now that many new verifiable sources have released - the product website is even back up. If not, please explain, thanks! --<b> +++$+++ Will you vote to keep [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chumby]] now that many new verifiable sources have released - the product website is even back up. If not, please explain, thanks! --<b>[[User:X1987x|x1987x]]</b><sup>([[User_talk:X1987x|talk]])</sup> 23:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
272738 +++$+++ Doctorbruno +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272737 +++$+++ 272737 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.156965660E09 +++$+++ I would like to point out [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/I._P._Gautam] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Amit_Shah] I am not able to understand the difference between these two discussions <font style=\"background:black\"><font color=\"black\"><b>_<\/b><\/font><\/font><font style=\"background:black\"> +++$+++ : I would like to point out [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/I._P._Gautam] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amit_Shah] I am not able to understand the difference between these two discussions <font style="background:black"><font color="black"><b>_</b></font></font><font style="background:black">[[User:Doctorbruno|<font color="gold"><b>Doctor Bruno</b></font>]]</font><font style="background:black"><font color="black"><b>_</b></font></font><font style="background:gold"><font color="black"><sup>[[User talk:Doctorbruno|_Talk_]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Emailuser/Doctorbruno|E Mail]]</sub></font></font> 12:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

534883 +++$+++ Hipi Zhdripi +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-17 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.145274300E09 +++$+++ See wat is hapen without arguments [[Nis]]-- +++$+++ See wat is hapen without arguments [[Nis]]--[[User:Hipi Zhdripi|Hipi Zhdripi]] 04:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
534884 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534883 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-17 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.145274540E09 +++$+++ There is nothing to argue about. Kosovo is part of Serbia. It is a province of Serbia under United Nations administration, in the Resolution 1244 (1999), adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 10 June 1999 [http:\/\/www.un.org\/Depts\/dhl\/da\/kosovo\/koso_sc1.htm], the UN reafirmed its commitment to the [[sovereignty]] and [[territorial integrity]] of the [[Federal Republic of Yugoslavia]] (and its sucessor state, the [[Serbia and Montenegro|Union of Serbia and Montenegro]], after the country changed its name). Anyone with some knowledge on [[International Law]] is aware that Serbia does not have a separate [[foreign policy]] (now and when Serbia and Montenegro was called the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia), this is left in the hands of the federal government. Therefore, the UN would not deal directly with Serbia or Montenegro, in the same way that it wouldn't do with Scotland separately if a problem were to arise in the UK. '''There is nothing else to argue about. Facts are non-negotiable. I do not want to waste my time again. Please stop leaving comments on my talk page''' (and do not copy my replies elsewere either) -- +++$+++ ::There is nothing to argue about. Kosovo is part of Serbia. It is a province of Serbia under United Nations administration, in the Resolution 1244 (1999), adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 10 June 1999 [http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/da/kosovo/koso_sc1.htm], the UN reafirmed its commitment to the [[sovereignty]] and [[territorial integrity]] of the [[Federal Republic of Yugoslavia]] (and its sucessor state, the [[Serbia and Montenegro|Union of Serbia and Montenegro]], after the country changed its name). Anyone with some knowledge on [[International Law]] is aware that Serbia does not have a separate [[foreign policy]] (now and when Serbia and Montenegro was called the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia), this is left in the hands of the federal government. Therefore, the UN would not deal directly with Serbia or Montenegro, in the same way that it wouldn't do with Scotland separately if a problem were to arise in the UK. '''There is nothing else to argue about. Facts are non-negotiable. I do not want to waste my time again. Please stop leaving comments on my talk page''' (and do not copy my replies elsewere either) --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 04:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

272741 +++$+++ KarateLady +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.157066700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for you comments. This real life stuff gets in the way when one is trying to wiki. I had surgery 2 weeks ago and my husband is making me rest, so I'm getting time to learn the wiki-ways since I can't do much else. I'm even getting ready to add a \"wikify\" tag to an article. Cheers to you too! KarateLady +++$+++ Thanks for you comments. This real life stuff gets in the way when one is trying to wiki. I had surgery 2 weeks ago and my husband is making me rest, so I'm getting time to learn the wiki-ways since I can't do much else. I'm even getting ready to add a "wikify" tag to an article. Cheers to you too! KarateLady[[User:KarateLady|KarateLady]] 16:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
272742 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272741 +++$+++ 272741 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.157076540E09 +++$+++ Good link on [[Talk:DeBarra Mayo]] to have a look at. We're getting somewhere.  +++$+++ :Good link on [[Talk:DeBarra Mayo]] to have a look at. We're getting somewhere. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 19:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

534886 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534886 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-17 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.145342100E09 +++$+++ He done this with several more maps too. I suspect that it is a sockpupet of some of the Albanian users from Kosovo article. Since you are involved in revert wars with them there, can you report this anonymous user (or sockpupet) to the proper place (I do not know how to report him).  +++$+++ He done this with several more maps too. I suspect that it is a sockpupet of some of the Albanian users from Kosovo article. Since you are involved in revert wars with them there, can you report this anonymous user (or sockpupet) to the proper place (I do not know how to report him). [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="red">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 23:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
534887 +++$+++ The Minister of War +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534886 +++$+++ 534886 +++$+++ 2006-04-18 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.145381940E09 +++$+++ I agree. Perhaps an [[WP:RCU]] could help in this endeavour. The edit war is taking ridiculous forms, and I think there might even be enough grounds to start an RFC on some editors, especially if they indeed use socks. [[User:The Minister of War|<u><font color=\"navy\">The Minist<\/font><\/u>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<u><font color=\"green\">e<\/font><\/u>]] +++$+++ :I agree. Perhaps an [[WP:RCU]] could help in this endeavour. The edit war is taking ridiculous forms, and I think there might even be enough grounds to start an RFC on some editors, especially if they indeed use socks. [[User:The Minister of War|<u><font color="navy">The Minist</font></u>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<u><font color="green">e</font></u>]][[User:The Minister of War|<u><font color="navy">r of War</font></u>]] [[User talk:The Minister of War|<sup><font color="navy">(Peace)</font></sup>]] 10:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

272743 +++$+++ KarateLady +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.157084460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for explaining the state abbreviation issue. I've been wondering about that but forgot to ask. I appreciate the well wishes too. Happy wikiing... KarateLady +++$+++ Thanks for explaining the state abbreviation issue. I've been wondering about that but forgot to ask. I appreciate the well wishes too. Happy wikiing... KarateLady[[User:KarateLady|KarateLady]] 21:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
272744 +++$+++ KarateLady +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272743 +++$+++ 272743 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.157148840E09 +++$+++ Just found your message about the technical reason related to this. Thanks again. :) KarateLady +++$+++ *Just found your message about the technical reason related to this. Thanks again. :) KarateLady[[User:KarateLady|KarateLady]] 15:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

534888 +++$+++ Xaosflux +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534888 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-18 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.145349240E09 +++$+++ As this appears to be an ongoing case, you may want to list it on [[WP:RFCU]] to have the sock puppets verified.  If the ip's are static in nature, they can be longterm blocked. \u2014  +++$+++ As this appears to be an ongoing case, you may want to list it on [[WP:RFCU]] to have the sock puppets verified.  If the ip's are static in nature, they can be longterm blocked. — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 01:34, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
534889 +++$+++ Xaosflux +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534888 +++$+++ 534888 +++$+++ 2006-04-18 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.145349300E09 +++$+++ If these are coming from AOL there is really not much that can be done short of filing an abuse complaint with AOL, other then extending sprotection and hoping they go away.  Do you know how to use the RIR lookups to see where they are from? \u2014  +++$+++ :If these are coming from AOL there is really not much that can be done short of filing an abuse complaint with AOL, other then extending sprotection and hoping they go away.  Do you know how to use the RIR lookups to see where they are from? — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 01:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
534890 +++$+++ Xaosflux +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534888 +++$+++ 534888 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.145527260E09 +++$+++ RIR is the [[Regional Internet Registry]].  This registry maintains what IP's belong to what companies.  You can do a RIR look up on a talk page for an anon by using the links at the bottom of the page e.g. on [[User talk:127.0.0.1]].  If you suspect these are from AOL, you may want to review [[Wikipedia:Dealing with AOL vandals]]. \u2014  +++$+++ :RIR is the [[Regional Internet Registry]].  This registry maintains what IP's belong to what companies.  You can do a RIR look up on a talk page for an anon by using the links at the bottom of the page e.g. on [[User talk:127.0.0.1]].  If you suspect these are from AOL, you may want to review [[Wikipedia:Dealing with AOL vandals]]. — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 03:01, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

534892 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-18 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.145388180E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Talk:Kosovo]] and search for the word ''stupid''. Hipi is really heading beyond all ways! -- +++$+++ Please see [[Talk:Kosovo]] and search for the word ''stupid''. Hipi is really heading beyond all ways! --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 12:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
534893 +++$+++ The Minister of War +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534892 +++$+++ 534892 +++$+++ 2006-04-18 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.145388660E09 +++$+++ Case in point. [[User:The Minister of War|<u><font color=\"navy\">The Minist<\/font><\/u>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<u><font color=\"green\">e<\/font><\/u>]] +++$+++ :Case in point. [[User:The Minister of War|<u><font color="navy">The Minist</font></u>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<u><font color="green">e</font></u>]][[User:The Minister of War|<u><font color="navy">r of War</font></u>]] [[User talk:The Minister of War|<sup><font color="navy">(Peace)</font></sup>]] 12:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

10605 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10605 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-08 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.220901300E09 +++$+++ The problem with the articles that we've been looking at is that they're being used rather as general references for the work, but there are absolutely no inline citations to the Cutler book that's the source for the section.  As such, it needs to be converted to a standard reference with inline citations, which I can't do because I don't own the book.   +++$+++ The problem with the articles that we've been looking at is that they're being used rather as general references for the work, but there are absolutely no inline citations to the Cutler book that's the source for the section.  As such, it needs to be converted to a standard reference with inline citations, which I can't do because I don't own the book.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 12:15, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
10606 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10605 +++$+++ 10605 +++$+++ 2008-09-08 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.220901480E09 +++$+++ I've just realised that (1) the book is online, and (2) the history sections are largely copied from it, as it's public domain.  I'm therefore converting to inline citations, which solve the problem entirely.   +++$+++ :I've just realised that (1) the book is online, and (2) the history sections are largely copied from it, as it's public domain.  I'm therefore converting to inline citations, which solve the problem entirely.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 12:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
10607 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10605 +++$+++ 10606 +++$+++ 2008-09-08 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.220902560E09 +++$+++ With quick searching, I can't find anywhere on the cited website the bits in the county's history section.  Can you look for these?  I need to prepare for a college class.   +++$+++ ::With quick searching, I can't find anywhere on the cited website the bits in the county's history section.  Can you look for these?  I need to prepare for a college class.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 12:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

534895 +++$+++ Dcabrilo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-20 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.145587440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for bringing the reverts to the talk page :) I'm pretty sure I read the indictment correctly, and I sourced relevant parts on [[Talk:Milan Milutinovi\u0107]]. It's also interesting to read a part about Slobodan Milo\u0161evi\u0107, where they pretty much establish that the president of Serbia has authority over (what was called) Yugoslav Army. Also, presidents of both Serbia and Montenegro serve on the Supreme defense council, a council which controls the Army, and since the 1970's it was really mostly republics who made decisions about the military, not so much the federation (that said, even the federal government is highly subordinate to republic governments). Cheers -- +++$+++ Thanks for bringing the reverts to the talk page :) I'm pretty sure I read the indictment correctly, and I sourced relevant parts on [[Talk:Milan Milutinović]]. It's also interesting to read a part about Slobodan Milošević, where they pretty much establish that the president of Serbia has authority over (what was called) Yugoslav Army. Also, presidents of both Serbia and Montenegro serve on the Supreme defense council, a council which controls the Army, and since the 1970's it was really mostly republics who made decisions about the military, not so much the federation (that said, even the federal government is highly subordinate to republic governments). Cheers --[[User:Dcabrilo|dcabrilo]] 19:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
534896 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534895 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.145591880E09 +++$+++ Understood. Regards, -- +++$+++ ::Understood. Regards, --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 20:58, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
534897 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534895 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-23 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.145817060E09 +++$+++ PS: The fact is that most of the users you insist on edit-warring with are NOT Serbian. I advise you to stop this personal attack thing and get on with some constructive wikiwork instead. -- +++$+++ ::PS: The fact is that most of the users you insist on edit-warring with are NOT Serbian. I advise you to stop this personal attack thing and get on with some constructive wikiwork instead. --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] 11:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
534898 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534895 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.145662860E09 +++$+++ However, please note that Hipi Zhdripi and Dardanv are very likely the same person. Hipi signed once as Dardanv and he is the only Wikipedian that promotes this [[Dardania]] romantic nationalist movement in [[Kosovo]]. Also, both have an English-speaking problem. I can say with ''60%'' acurracy that Hipi and Dardanv are the same person. -- +++$+++ :::However, please note that Hipi Zhdripi and Dardanv are very likely the same person. Hipi signed once as Dardanv and he is the only Wikipedian that promotes this [[Dardania]] romantic nationalist movement in [[Kosovo]]. Also, both have an English-speaking problem. I can say with ''60%'' acurracy that Hipi and Dardanv are the same person. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 16:41, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

272753 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-04 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.157410080E09 +++$+++ Mr Mets, I noticed that [[User:Merryhobby]] posted another long message here and I'm moving it back to his own talk page. I am going to ask him to post his questions and comments on his own page so other can respond to him as I feel his badgering of you has been really over the top. Please revert me if you disagree and would like his comment here. Hang in there, mate.  +++$+++ Mr Mets, I noticed that [[User:Merryhobby]] posted another long message here and I'm moving it back to his own talk page. I am going to ask him to post his questions and comments on his own page so other can respond to him as I feel his badgering of you has been really over the top. Please revert me if you disagree and would like his comment here. Hang in there, mate. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 15:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
272754 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272753 +++$+++ 272753 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.157410260E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I was just about to move it to his talk page and say the same thing as well :-). \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ :Thanks.  I was just about to move it to his talk page and say the same thing as well :-). —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 15:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
272755 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272753 +++$+++ 272754 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.157413860E09 +++$+++ Excellent. I'm glad I didn't do the wrong thing! By the way, your friend [[User:Maxasus]] in the section above titled \"A reply\" is a sock of indefinitely blocked [[User:Joshuarooney]].  +++$+++ ::Excellent. I'm glad I didn't do the wrong thing! By the way, your friend [[User:Maxasus]] in the section above titled "A reply" is a sock of indefinitely blocked [[User:Joshuarooney]]. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 16:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
272756 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272753 +++$+++ 272755 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.157413980E09 +++$+++ I have no idea why Maxasus\/Joshuaroony was replying to me (I don't think I ever had contact with him), so I'll just ignore it. :) \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ :::I have no idea why Maxasus/Joshuaroony was replying to me (I don't think I ever had contact with him), so I'll just ignore it. :) —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 16:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
272757 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272753 +++$+++ 272756 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.157414280E09 +++$+++ Also, just out of curiosity, when do you think you're going to [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Sarah Ewart|run for adminship]]? \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ ::::Also, just out of curiosity, when do you think you're going to [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Sarah Ewart|run for adminship]]? —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 16:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
272758 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272753 +++$+++ 272757 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.157414700E09 +++$+++ Oh, I see. I've noticed a few other strange messages he's left various people. He also started  [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Maxasus]] where he openly declares he's Joshuarooney, so I'm not sure what he's up to. :\/ <br \/>I've been really busy with work, but I have tomorrow off and I'm planning on having a go at the RfA questions then. So, if I can get the courage up, I'll do it soon. :)    +++$+++ :::::Oh, I see. I've noticed a few other strange messages he's left various people. He also started  [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Maxasus]] where he openly declares he's Joshuarooney, so I'm not sure what he's up to. :/ <br />I've been really busy with work, but I have tomorrow off and I'm planning on having a go at the RfA questions then. So, if I can get the courage up, I'll do it soon. :)   [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 17:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
272759 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272753 +++$+++ 272758 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.157414760E09 +++$+++ Can't wait to support! :-) \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ ::::::Can't wait to support! :-) —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 17:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
272760 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272753 +++$+++ 272759 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.157415000E09 +++$+++ Thank you! That's really nice to know. I'm glad you haven't changed your mind! :)  +++$+++ :::::::Thank you! That's really nice to know. I'm glad you haven't changed your mind! :) [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 17:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
272761 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272753 +++$+++ 272760 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.157416680E09 +++$+++ That would really be a first if the nominator opposed! :-) \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ ::::::::That would really be a first if the nominator opposed! :-) —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 17:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
272762 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272753 +++$+++ 272761 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.157421960E09 +++$+++ Not really, remember the recent, weird saga of JTKiefer and Pegasus?  BTW Sarah, I will also offer strong support if\/when you are a candidate for admin.  Regards,  +++$+++ :::::::::Not really, remember the recent, weird saga of JTKiefer and Pegasus?  BTW Sarah, I will also offer strong support if/when you are a candidate for admin.  Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 19:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

10611 +++$+++ Ayrenz +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-05 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.246823520E09 +++$+++ If we have expression 10,000,000.00 how to change it into 10.000.000,00 or 1000000, is there any template that can do it or how to make such expression in Wikipedia template, thanks<br \/> +++$+++ If we have expression 10,000,000.00 how to change it into 10.000.000,00 or 1000000, is there any template that can do it or how to make such expression in Wikipedia template, thanks<br />[[User:Ayrenz|Ayrenz]] ([[User talk:Ayrenz|talk]]) 12:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
10612 +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ Moverton +++$+++ 10611 +++$+++ 10611 +++$+++ 2009-07-07 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.247027820E09 +++$+++ I don't know of any way to currently unformat a formatted number using templates.  There are string functions which have not yet been implemented in Wikipedia (see [[mw:Extension:StringFunctions]]).  Maybe the [[:Category:string manipulation templates|string manipulation templates]] would work, but I have not tried to use them. \u2014 +++$+++ :I don't know of any way to currently unformat a formatted number using templates.  There are string functions which have not yet been implemented in Wikipedia (see [[mw:Extension:StringFunctions]]).  Maybe the [[:Category:string manipulation templates|string manipulation templates]] would work, but I have not tried to use them. —[[User:Moverton|Mike]] 21:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

534904 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-23 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.145857680E09 +++$+++ It looks like the RfA has quickly become a battleground of the varous Balkan ethnic groups, Jesus Christ. I voted anyways, and I think he may have a good chance of succeeding this time. Just watch out for any signs of votestacking. Cheers, &mdash; +++$+++ It looks like the RfA has quickly become a battleground of the varous Balkan ethnic groups, Jesus Christ. I voted anyways, and I think he may have a good chance of succeeding this time. Just watch out for any signs of votestacking. Cheers, &mdash;[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoikhoi]] 22:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
534905 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534904 +++$+++ 534904 +++$+++ 2006-04-23 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.145858340E09 +++$+++ Yeah, this reminds me a lot of [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Khoikhoi|my RfA]]. Unfortunately, one user who didn't like me decided to spam the talk pages of '''100''' editors, asking them all to oppose me. Oh well, at least that can't happen for this one. &mdash; +++$+++ :Yeah, this reminds me a lot of [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Khoikhoi|my RfA]]. Unfortunately, one user who didn't like me decided to spam the talk pages of '''100''' editors, asking them all to oppose me. Oh well, at least that can't happen for this one. &mdash;[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoikhoi]] 22:59, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
534906 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534904 +++$+++ 534905 +++$+++ 2006-04-23 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.145859060E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks. :) I guess the way to undo all that is by making more friends than enemies. &mdash; +++$+++ ::Hey, thanks. :) I guess the way to undo all that is by making more friends than enemies. &mdash;[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoikhoi]] 23:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

272763 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-04 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.157433480E09 +++$+++ That's the obvious thing to do, I think. I'll sort out other things you mentioned when I can.  +++$+++ That's the obvious thing to do, I think. I'll sort out other things you mentioned when I can. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 22:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
272764 +++$+++ Alunwyn +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272763 +++$+++ 272763 +++$+++ 2006-09-13 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.158198540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for fixing this - I was born nearby, I drive past the castle every time I go home (proper home that is!) and Dryslwyn was our dialling code!  +++$+++ :Thanks for fixing this - I was born nearby, I drive past the castle every time I go home (proper home that is!) and Dryslwyn was our dialling code! [[User:Alunwyn|Alunwyn]] 18:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

272765 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272765 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-05 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.157459160E09 +++$+++ I never knew that. Is there somewhere I can quickly readup before I remove editing abilities? Not that I don't trust your judgement, but I like to be \"in the know\" before I aim. --  +++$+++ I never knew that. Is there somewhere I can quickly readup before I remove editing abilities? Not that I don't trust your judgement, but I like to be "in the know" before I aim. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 05:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
272766 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272765 +++$+++ 272765 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.157459520E09 +++$+++ Found this, [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject on open proxies]]. --  +++$+++ :Found this, [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject on open proxies]]. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 05:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
272767 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272765 +++$+++ 272766 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.157459760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that. Learn somethig every day. Zscout370 has blocked the offender anyway. Have you listed your RfA yet, and I slept through it, or you're still in the making? --  +++$+++ ::Thanks for that. Learn somethig every day. Zscout370 has blocked the offender anyway. Have you listed your RfA yet, and I slept through it, or you're still in the making? -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 05:36, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
272768 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272765 +++$+++ 272767 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.157459880E09 +++$+++ Never mind. I read the above post. It's coming :) --  +++$+++ :::Never mind. I read the above post. It's coming :) -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 05:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
272769 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272765 +++$+++ 272766 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.157467560E09 +++$+++ lol - Sliat suggests typing it in as many times as he wants is not a revert, yet when more than one person might disagree with him it's a consipracy? (actually, it's not all that clear that they do diasgree in this case though) -- +++$+++ ::lol - Sliat suggests typing it in as many times as he wants is not a revert, yet when more than one person might disagree with him it's a consipracy? (actually, it's not all that clear that they do diasgree in this case though) --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 07:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
272770 +++$+++ Slf67 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272765 +++$+++ 272765 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.157525100E09 +++$+++ You're more than welcome to try! -- +++$+++ :You're more than welcome to try! --[[User:Slf67|Steve]] 23:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

534910 +++$+++  +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534910 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-24 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.145936160E09 +++$+++ Great! I have added a link to <nowiki>{{dmoz|Dmoz\/Arts\/Digital\/Net_Art\/|Net Art}}<\/nowiki> just now. Thanks for the advise! -- +++$+++ Great! I have added a link to <nowiki>{{dmoz|Dmoz/Arts/Digital/Net_Art/|Net Art}}</nowiki> just now. Thanks for the advise! --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup>[[Image:Andalucialibre_flag.jpg|25px]] 20:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
534911 +++$+++  +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534910 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-24 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.145924520E09 +++$+++ You know the rules. Stick to civility and NPOV, discuss your views and respect other wikipedians. You were warned many times about your behaviour. Indeed you are [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/3RR#User:Dardanv_.28again.21.29|your worst enemy]]. -- +++$+++ ::You know the rules. Stick to civility and NPOV, discuss your views and respect other wikipedians. You were warned many times about your behaviour. Indeed you are [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Dardanv_.28again.21.29|your worst enemy]]. --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup>[[Image:Andalucialibre_flag.jpg|25px]] 17:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
534912 +++$+++  +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534910 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-24 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.145924640E09 +++$+++ PS:I do not \"trade\" articles. Wikipedia is owned by no one. The sooner you understand this, the better for everyone-- +++$+++ :::PS:I do not "trade" articles. Wikipedia is owned by no one. The sooner you understand this, the better for everyone--[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup>[[Image:Andalucialibre_flag.jpg|25px]] 17:24, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

263915 +++$+++ Budgiekiller +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263915 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.167797280E09 +++$+++ ...for reverting the vandalism on my user page while I was away, very much appreciated....   +++$+++ ...for reverting the vandalism on my user page while I was away, very much appreciated....  [[User:Budgiekiller|Budgiekiller]] 20:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
263916 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263915 +++$+++ 263915 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.167809700E09 +++$+++ Ah, np... I think you've done the same for me, but I was embarrassingly less courteous and didn't thank you for it.  +++$+++ :Ah, np... I think you've done the same for me, but I was embarrassingly less courteous and didn't thank you for it. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

534918 +++$+++  +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-25 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.146004620E09 +++$+++ Whether the talk page is public or not, this is irrelevant. It was Linuxbreak's discussion page. It is quite clear HRE did not invite you personally to take any action and you did not seek any sort of reassurance either. Regards, -- +++$+++ Whether the talk page is public or not, this is irrelevant. It was Linuxbreak's discussion page. It is quite clear HRE did not invite you personally to take any action and you did not seek any sort of reassurance either. Regards, --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup>[[Image:Andalucialibre_flag.jpg|25px]] 15:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
534919 +++$+++ VKokielov +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534918 +++$+++ 534918 +++$+++ 2006-04-25 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.146005100E09 +++$+++ Since neither of us is dumb, and both of us know why I did it, let's end the discussion.  Don't pretend to interpret literally.  You'll get caught in the net you lay, one day.  -- +++$+++ :Since neither of us is dumb, and both of us know why I did it, let's end the discussion.  Don't pretend to interpret literally.  You'll get caught in the net you lay, one day.  --[[User:VKokielov|VKokielov]] 15:45, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
534920 +++$+++  +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534918 +++$+++ 534919 +++$+++ 2006-04-25 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.146005220E09 +++$+++ Whatever your actions were, I still assume good faith. Simply pointing out that given the gravity of the matter, this is up to the user and the bureaucrat to sort out by themselves. Best regards, -- +++$+++ ::Whatever your actions were, I still assume good faith. Simply pointing out that given the gravity of the matter, this is up to the user and the bureaucrat to sort out by themselves. Best regards, --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup>[[Image:Andalucialibre_flag.jpg|25px]] 15:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

10636 +++$+++ FLAHAM +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ 10636 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-07 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.307482080E09 +++$+++ Abtract:  I noticed your comment on my talk page about my entry on the CIMA page.  The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and CIMA announced last week that the credential to be issued by their joint venture will be the Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA) credential.  The joint venture will begin issuing the CGMA credential early in 2012.  This is what I wanted to reflect in my edit of the CIMA article.  If I was not clear enough please change in accordingly.  I am a member of a national AICPA committee and received the AICPA press release on the subject last week.  Regards.   +++$+++ Abtract:  I noticed your comment on my talk page about my entry on the CIMA page.  The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and CIMA announced last week that the credential to be issued by their joint venture will be the Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA) credential.  The joint venture will begin issuing the CGMA credential early in 2012.  This is what I wanted to reflect in my edit of the CIMA article.  If I was not clear enough please change in accordingly.  I am a member of a national AICPA committee and received the AICPA press release on the subject last week.  Regards.  [[User:FLAHAM|FLAHAM]] ([[User talk:FLAHAM|talk]]) 14:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
10637 +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ 10636 +++$+++ 10636 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.307484120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the explanation. I reverted your edit for three reasons. First, it seemd odd as I couldn't quite see how a global qualification could be chartered (who would issue the charter?). Second, there was no citation which is a sign that it may not be correct. And last, when I went to your talk page I saw that your only contact with the WP world seemed to have also been rejected by another editor. Having said all that, you make a good sounding rebutal and I an now inclined to think you probably know what you are talking about. To put my mind at ease and avoid someone else reverting you, can I suggest that you include a citation? Apologies for reverting and thanks for stopping by.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the explanation. I reverted your edit for three reasons. First, it seemd odd as I couldn't quite see how a global qualification could be chartered (who would issue the charter?). Second, there was no citation which is a sign that it may not be correct. And last, when I went to your talk page I saw that your only contact with the WP world seemed to have also been rejected by another editor. Having said all that, you make a good sounding rebutal and I an now inclined to think you probably know what you are talking about. To put my mind at ease and avoid someone else reverting you, can I suggest that you include a citation? Apologies for reverting and thanks for stopping by. [[User:Abtract|Abtract]] ([[User talk:Abtract#top|talk]]) 15:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
10638 +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ 10636 +++$+++ 10636 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.307646540E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Abtract|Abtract]] ([[User talk:Abtract#top|talk]]) 12:09, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

10639 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ 10639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-07 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.307504700E09 +++$+++ If you continue interacting with other editors like you did in the section above, I shall have to seriously consider nominating you for adminship...  +++$+++ If you continue interacting with other editors like you did in the section above, I shall have to seriously consider nominating you for adminship... [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 20:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
10640 +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ 10639 +++$+++ 10639 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.307646420E09 +++$+++ OK, enough already.  +++$+++ :OK, enough already. [[User:Abtract|Abtract]] ([[User talk:Abtract#top|talk]]) 12:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

534928 +++$+++ Zmaj +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-26 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.146057960E09 +++$+++ You made a false statement. It's a fact. No way I'm apologizing for telling the truth. -- +++$+++ You made a false statement. It's a fact. No way I'm apologizing for telling the truth. --[[User:Zmaj|Zmaj]] 06:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
534929 +++$+++  +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534928 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-26 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.146074700E09 +++$+++ Given your recent uncivil behaviour, I will keep a close eye on you. You have already been warned twice. -- +++$+++ ::Given your recent uncivil behaviour, I will keep a close eye on you. You have already been warned twice. --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup>[[Image:Andalucialibre_flag.jpg|25px]] 11:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
534930 +++$+++ Zmaj +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534928 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-26 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.146075840E09 +++$+++ I answered on [[User talk:Zmaj|my talk page]]. -- +++$+++ :::I answered on [[User talk:Zmaj|my talk page]]. --[[User:Zmaj|Zmaj]] 11:24, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
534931 +++$+++ Zmaj +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534928 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-26 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.146076200E09 +++$+++ I checked [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]]. It explictly says: ''Disagreements about content such as \"Your statement about X is wrong\" or \"Your statement is a point of view, not fact\" are not personal attacks.'' -- +++$+++ :::I checked [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]]. It explictly says: ''Disagreements about content such as "Your statement about X is wrong" or "Your statement is a point of view, not fact" are not personal attacks.'' --[[User:Zmaj|Zmaj]] 11:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
534932 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534928 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-26 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.146076380E09 +++$+++ You know well, this is not what you said: \"...and this coming from someone who has already made a false statement\" is an [[Ad Hominem]]. Therefore, a personal attack. -- +++$+++ ::::You know well, this is not what you said: "...and this coming from someone who has already made a false statement" is an [[Ad Hominem]]. Therefore, a personal attack. --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 11:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
534933 +++$+++ Zmaj +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534928 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-26 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.146077520E09 +++$+++ I see... You're right. I did the wrong thing. If that's any solace to you, I didn't look at it that way until you pointed out [[Ad Hominem]] to me. It truly was a \"logical fallacy\", as they say in that article. OK, I'll admit my mistake on the HRE candidacy page. I'm not an unreasonable man. -- +++$+++ :::::I see... You're right. I did the wrong thing. If that's any solace to you, I didn't look at it that way until you pointed out [[Ad Hominem]] to me. It truly was a "logical fallacy", as they say in that article. OK, I'll admit my mistake on the HRE candidacy page. I'm not an unreasonable man. --[[User:Zmaj|Zmaj]] 11:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

10641 +++$+++ Phatius McBluff +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ 10641 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-22 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.308788460E09 +++$+++ Hi. I just noticed your most recent edit on [[Mythology]]: you reworded a sourced statement, changing the word \"men\" to \"humans\"; your edit summary says, \"There are quite a few women in myths\". [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mythology&action=historysubmit&diff=435430923&oldid=435006524] I'm a bit puzzled by this edit summary. It seems to suggest that you reworded the sentence because you thought that it was factually incorrect (e.g. that it limited human involvement in myths to ''male'' human involvement). Of course, as you probably know, you can't just ''change'' a sourced statement (even a factually incorrect one) while leaving the citations in place, because that might cause the statement to say something other than what the sources say. Now, I haven't reverted your edit, both because it was obviously a good-faith edit and because it seems rather innocuous. I mean, the word \"men\" in that sentence was clearly being used to denote humans in general, so your edit didn't actually change the meaning of the sentence. Please don't get the wrong idea: I'm not here to pick a fight with you. I'm just mildly confused about the rationale behind your edit. Were you simply trying to update the sentence to reflect modern English usage (in which \"man\" is no longer the usual term for referring to humans in general)? If so, then I have no objection. -- +++$+++ Hi. I just noticed your most recent edit on [[Mythology]]: you reworded a sourced statement, changing the word "men" to "humans"; your edit summary says, "There are quite a few women in myths". [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mythology&action=historysubmit&diff=435430923&oldid=435006524] I'm a bit puzzled by this edit summary. It seems to suggest that you reworded the sentence because you thought that it was factually incorrect (e.g. that it limited human involvement in myths to ''male'' human involvement). Of course, as you probably know, you can't just ''change'' a sourced statement (even a factually incorrect one) while leaving the citations in place, because that might cause the statement to say something other than what the sources say. Now, I haven't reverted your edit, both because it was obviously a good-faith edit and because it seems rather innocuous. I mean, the word "men" in that sentence was clearly being used to denote humans in general, so your edit didn't actually change the meaning of the sentence. Please don't get the wrong idea: I'm not here to pick a fight with you. I'm just mildly confused about the rationale behind your edit. Were you simply trying to update the sentence to reflect modern English usage (in which "man" is no longer the usual term for referring to humans in general)? If so, then I have no objection. --[[User:Phatius McBluff|Phatius McBluff]] ([[User talk:Phatius McBluff|talk]]) 17:21, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
10642 +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ 10641 +++$+++ 10641 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.308807060E09 +++$+++ Absolutely what I was trying to do. I certainly won't go to the stake on it, and I did consider that I may be changing the cited work's wording. However, there are three cited works and it wasn't shown in quotes so I guessed it was probably a paraphrasing in which case my new paraphrasing, I hoped, would reflect both the intention of the authors and modern mores. If you, knowing the cited works as I guess you do, think the previous wording is a better reflection of their meaning, please revert my edit. And thanks for stopping by with such an elegantly worded query.  +++$+++ :Absolutely what I was trying to do. I certainly won't go to the stake on it, and I did consider that I may be changing the cited work's wording. However, there are three cited works and it wasn't shown in quotes so I guessed it was probably a paraphrasing in which case my new paraphrasing, I hoped, would reflect both the intention of the authors and modern mores. If you, knowing the cited works as I guess you do, think the previous wording is a better reflection of their meaning, please revert my edit. And thanks for stopping by with such an elegantly worded query. [[User:Abtract|Abtract]] ([[User talk:Abtract#top|talk]]) 22:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

10643 +++$+++ PiCo +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ 10643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.309328700E09 +++$+++ If you want the current scholarly understanding of how the Pentateuch came to be written, see [[Priestly source]] and [[Jahwist]] - the PS is responsible for chapter 1 and J for chapter 2.  +++$+++ If you want the current scholarly understanding of how the Pentateuch came to be written, see [[Priestly source]] and [[Jahwist]] - the PS is responsible for chapter 1 and J for chapter 2. [[User:PiCo|PiCo]] ([[User talk:PiCo|talk]]) 23:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
10644 +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ Abtract +++$+++ 10643 +++$+++ 10643 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.309370340E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that seems very useful I will look at it in more detail after my hols.  +++$+++ :Thanks, that seems very useful I will look at it in more detail after my hols. [[User:Abtract|Abtract]] ([[User talk:Abtract#top|talk]]) 10:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

272790 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-12 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.158049260E09 +++$+++ Mr Mets, do you think you could please update the edit count in your nom on the [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Sarah Ewart|RfA]] page? I've just gone over 5000 [http:\/\/tools.wikimedia.de\/~essjay\/edit_count\/Count.php?username=Sarah+Ewart] Many thanks,  +++$+++ Mr Mets, do you think you could please update the edit count in your nom on the [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Sarah Ewart|RfA]] page? I've just gone over 5000 [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~essjay/edit_count/Count.php?username=Sarah+Ewart] Many thanks, [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 01:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
272791 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272790 +++$+++ 272790 +++$+++ 2006-09-12 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.158051780E09 +++$+++ No problem, all done!  Good luck when it goes live! \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ :No problem, all done!  Good luck when it goes live! —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 02:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

10647 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Jennica +++$+++ 10647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-15 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.208302920E09 +++$+++ Hello Jennica, I noticed you revert vandalsm occasionally. Would you like me to grant your account [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature|rollback rights]] to help you revert vandalism more easily?  +++$+++ Hello Jennica, I noticed you revert vandalsm occasionally. Would you like me to grant your account [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature|rollback rights]] to help you revert vandalism more easily? [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
10648 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Jennica +++$+++ 10647 +++$+++ 10647 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.208385780E09 +++$+++ Rollback granted. :) Just remember it's only for reverting vandalism, and not for reverting good faith edits or use in revert wars. For practice, you may wish to see [[Wikipedia:New admin school\/Rollback]]. Good luck.  +++$+++ :Rollback granted. :) Just remember it's only for reverting vandalism, and not for reverting good faith edits or use in revert wars. For practice, you may wish to see [[Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback]]. Good luck. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 15:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

613444 +++$+++ Slrubenstein +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-03 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.228366740E09 +++$+++ I do not want discussion of my comment to get bogged down in the past.  I think ArbCom needs some kind of clear (transparent) principle to guide it in the future.  Could you comment?  Say wahtever you think - just please push the conversation in the direction the future, not the past. Thanks,  +++$+++ I do not want discussion of my comment to get bogged down in the past.  I think ArbCom needs some kind of clear (transparent) principle to guide it in the future.  Could you comment?  Say wahtever you think - just please push the conversation in the direction the future, not the past. Thanks, [[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]]   |  [[User talk:Slrubenstein|Talk]] 20:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
613445 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613444 +++$+++ 613444 +++$+++ 2008-12-03 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.228374180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up, I've posted my tuppenceworth about future guidance and principles to consider. Some forethought would have helped. .  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up, I've posted my tuppenceworth about future guidance and principles to consider. Some forethought would have helped. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 23:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

272795 +++$+++ BenAveling +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-12 07:19:00 +++$+++ 1.158070740E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've added a question to your RFA. Though I'm sure you've already noticed.  :-)  Regards,  +++$+++ Hi, I've added a question to your RFA. Though I'm sure you've already noticed.  :-)  Regards, [[User talk:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 07:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
272796 +++$+++ Andypandy.UK +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272795 +++$+++ 272795 +++$+++ 2006-09-13 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.158172620E09 +++$+++ So have I.--<font style=\"background:white\"> +++$+++ :So have I.--<font style="background:white">[[User:Andypandy.UK|Andeh]]</font> 11:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
272797 +++$+++ Andypandy.UK +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272795 +++$+++ 272796 +++$+++ 2006-09-13 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.158173940E09 +++$+++ I noticed I am reading now, thank you.--<font style=\"background:white\"> +++$+++ ::I noticed I am reading now, thank you.--<font style="background:white">[[User:Andypandy.UK|Andeh]]</font> 11:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

272798 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-12 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.158097380E09 +++$+++ Your RfA writeup mentions that you've been seeking the courage to stand. I'm glad to see you have, so that I could support, but if during the process you find you need some fortification, I've supplied some liquid courage. There's a brand of [[Courage (brewery)|beer]] from the UK that would have been perfect as an image, but I couldn't source a free pic so this Irish beer will have to do. Be a \"spitfire\" if you need to be, and best wishes. ++ +++$+++ Your RfA writeup mentions that you've been seeking the courage to stand. I'm glad to see you have, so that I could support, but if during the process you find you need some fortification, I've supplied some liquid courage. There's a brand of [[Courage (brewery)|beer]] from the UK that would have been perfect as an image, but I couldn't source a free pic so this Irish beer will have to do. Be a "spitfire" if you need to be, and best wishes. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 14:43, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
272799 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272798 +++$+++ 272798 +++$+++ 2006-09-13 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.158178860E09 +++$+++ I've been informed (by one of your lurkers) that this is an English beer, not Irish, sorry for any confusion on that point. :) ++ +++$+++ :I've been informed (by one of your lurkers) that this is an English beer, not Irish, sorry for any confusion on that point. :) ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 13:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
272800 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272798 +++$+++ 272799 +++$+++ 2006-09-13 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.158179160E09 +++$+++ Sorry Sarah, that was me. It's a delicious Shepherd's Neame nutty ale. I'd be happy to buy you both a beer when your RfA is over! -- +++$+++ ::Sorry Sarah, that was me. It's a delicious Shepherd's Neame nutty ale. I'd be happy to buy you both a beer when your RfA is over! --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 13:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
272801 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272798 +++$+++ 272800 +++$+++ 2006-09-13 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.158179460E09 +++$+++ Man, you certainly are an ''efficient'' lurker, aren't you! :) I'll take you up on that next time we're in the same country... although I suspect perhaps Sarah's the one who you're really wanting to buy the round for??? :) I never turn down free beer. (although it's been my experience with the buying a round process, as practiced in the UK, that getting a round bought early on means only that you're in for more expense later, as later rounds tend to be bigger. Is it that way in Ireland too?) ++ +++$+++ :::Man, you certainly are an ''efficient'' lurker, aren't you! :) I'll take you up on that next time we're in the same country... although I suspect perhaps Sarah's the one who you're really wanting to buy the round for??? :) I never turn down free beer. (although it's been my experience with the buying a round process, as practiced in the UK, that getting a round bought early on means only that you're in for more expense later, as later rounds tend to be bigger. Is it that way in Ireland too?) ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 13:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
272802 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272798 +++$+++ 272801 +++$+++ 2006-09-13 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.158179820E09 +++$+++ Hmmm, that can vary, as people drop out (occasionally quite literally!) of the round, it can get cheaper as well. It brings to mind our Scottish expression (for a stingy person) \"First out of the taxi, last up to the bar\"; not something I have ever been accused of (at least not to my face). I may be relocating to California at some point, although it is uncertain just now. Not such a great beer culture there as here or Ireland, but not as bad either as some folks here believe. Cheers! -- +++$+++ ::::Hmmm, that can vary, as people drop out (occasionally quite literally!) of the round, it can get cheaper as well. It brings to mind our Scottish expression (for a stingy person) "First out of the taxi, last up to the bar"; not something I have ever been accused of (at least not to my face). I may be relocating to California at some point, although it is uncertain just now. Not such a great beer culture there as here or Ireland, but not as bad either as some folks here believe. Cheers! --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 13:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

10659 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ Colonies Chris +++$+++ 10659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-27 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.309222140E09 +++$+++ I've reverted your edit because the convention is that the name of the ship appears first, with the flag afterwards, per all other lists of shipwrecks. No objection to individual wikilinks being removed if you think that there is overlinking, but that edit, whilst made with good intent, was not desirable.  +++$+++ I've reverted your edit because the convention is that the name of the ship appears first, with the flag afterwards, per all other lists of shipwrecks. No objection to individual wikilinks being removed if you think that there is overlinking, but that edit, whilst made with good intent, was not desirable. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 17:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
10660 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ Colonies Chris +++$+++ 10659 +++$+++ 10659 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.309274700E09 +++$+++ No problem, I could see that the ''intent'' was constructive, even if the result wasn't!  +++$+++ :No problem, I could see that the ''intent'' was constructive, even if the result wasn't! [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 08:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

482374 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-25 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.169722200E09 +++$+++ Got another one for you: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Crankin25]  +++$+++ Got another one for you: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Crankin25] [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 02:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
482375 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482374 +++$+++ 482374 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.169722380E09 +++$+++ Done.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Done.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 02:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
482376 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482374 +++$+++ 482375 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.169723820E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I'll go through its contributions and see if anything needs reverting. Here's a poser: If someone were to go to the [[Patent]] article and posts \"patent nonsense\", would that be a redundancy? :)  +++$+++ ::Thank you. I'll go through its contributions and see if anything needs reverting. Here's a poser: If someone were to go to the [[Patent]] article and posts "patent nonsense", would that be a redundancy? :) [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 03:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
482377 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482374 +++$+++ 482376 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.169724360E09 +++$+++ You and that other user are way ahead of me. :)  +++$+++ :::You and that other user are way ahead of me. :) [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 03:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
482378 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482374 +++$+++ 482377 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.169724960E09 +++$+++ Heh heh.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::::Heh heh.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

10663 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Colonies Chris +++$+++ 10663 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312239240E09 +++$+++ Although I can appreciate unlinking overly linked words in articles I have seen several cases were you, IMO, took the delinking a little too far. For example I just reverted your edits to [[Francis D. Rauber]] were I believe one link of each is appropriate. Particularly linking United States of America under the allegiance in the Infobox. There are in fact a number of United States of X and since not all readers of the pedia are from the USA I do not agree that we should assume that they all would undeerstand. It is to me a bad assumption to make. -- +++$+++ Although I can appreciate unlinking overly linked words in articles I have seen several cases were you, IMO, took the delinking a little too far. For example I just reverted your edits to [[Francis D. Rauber]] were I believe one link of each is appropriate. Particularly linking United States of America under the allegiance in the Infobox. There are in fact a number of United States of X and since not all readers of the pedia are from the USA I do not agree that we should assume that they all would undeerstand. It is to me a bad assumption to make. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 15:54, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
10664 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Colonies Chris +++$+++ 10663 +++$+++ 10663 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.312240320E09 +++$+++ Partially true but the MOS doesn't say don't link them at all. These terms are useful to link and add value to the articles IMO. Your opinion is the opposite and thats fine but since you are using AWB, and there are those of us that would disagree that delinking these when they are only used once in the article is useful, it could be considered misuse of AWB. Ther reason I reverted the other edits was, as I stated above, because all they did was delink common terms that were only used once. If they were linked 5 times and you removed 4 I would have left them, but having them linked once each is fine. Additionally this could be considered a minor inconsequential edit. Even though delinking them does render changes to the page I would argue that delinking these terms when nothing else is done is pointless and uneeded. -- +++$+++ :Partially true but the MOS doesn't say don't link them at all. These terms are useful to link and add value to the articles IMO. Your opinion is the opposite and thats fine but since you are using AWB, and there are those of us that would disagree that delinking these when they are only used once in the article is useful, it could be considered misuse of AWB. Ther reason I reverted the other edits was, as I stated above, because all they did was delink common terms that were only used once. If they were linked 5 times and you removed 4 I would have left them, but having them linked once each is fine. Additionally this could be considered a minor inconsequential edit. Even though delinking them does render changes to the page I would argue that delinking these terms when nothing else is done is pointless and uneeded. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 16:12, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
10665 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Colonies Chris +++$+++ 10663 +++$+++ 10664 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.312241340E09 +++$+++ Just because you reject it doesn't make it untrue. I used to do a number of these tasks myself and got my hand slapped for it as wasteful myself. As for the Port au prince. When I saw multiple dubious changes I simply reverted. I'm not going to go picking through looking for one or 2 good edits. For what its worth I'm not goin to follow you around checking on what else your editing. This article was on my watchlist so I reverted. Its not worth arguing over and not worth an edit war. I am just relaying my opinions as well as some warnings I have received in the past for the same activities (I lost AWB access for a while over it by the way). Go ahead and take your chances but eventually someone else will complain who has admin rights and they just revoke your AWB access or write an ANI or something else. For what its worth I would say about 98% of your edits are fine, its just when you do these lone delink changes that I find annoying. -- +++$+++ ::Just because you reject it doesn't make it untrue. I used to do a number of these tasks myself and got my hand slapped for it as wasteful myself. As for the Port au prince. When I saw multiple dubious changes I simply reverted. I'm not going to go picking through looking for one or 2 good edits. For what its worth I'm not goin to follow you around checking on what else your editing. This article was on my watchlist so I reverted. Its not worth arguing over and not worth an edit war. I am just relaying my opinions as well as some warnings I have received in the past for the same activities (I lost AWB access for a while over it by the way). Go ahead and take your chances but eventually someone else will complain who has admin rights and they just revoke your AWB access or write an ANI or something else. For what its worth I would say about 98% of your edits are fine, its just when you do these lone delink changes that I find annoying. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 16:29, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
10666 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Colonies Chris +++$+++ 10663 +++$+++ 10665 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312242300E09 +++$+++ I left a note at the AWB discussion page [[Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser|here]]. -- +++$+++ :::I left a note at the AWB discussion page [[Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser|here]]. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 16:45, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

272810 +++$+++ 82.153.96.176 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272810 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-14 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.158294300E09 +++$+++ Just wondering why you thought this was a 'spam site'... I'd not actually looked at it before you removed the link, but it doesn't have advertising, and seems to have some quite good reference images that are relevant to the article.  +++$+++ Just wondering why you thought this was a 'spam site'... I'd not actually looked at it before you removed the link, but it doesn't have advertising, and seems to have some quite good reference images that are relevant to the article. [[User:82.153.96.176|82.153.96.176]] 21:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
272811 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272810 +++$+++ 272810 +++$+++ 2006-09-15 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.158385440E09 +++$+++ Hey Sarah, you just got in before my Wikibreak :). Yes, that's definetly true. Here's some references: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Reference_desk_archive\/Science\/2006_July_3#Open_proxy](read the last dot point), [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser\/Case\/Lightbringer#WinterMan_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29.2C_Guizarres_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29](first sentence under Feb), [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser\/Case\/BillyBong] (read first sentence), [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser\/Case\/Rockumsockum] (second paragraph). That should be enough to convince someone ;). But yeah, if you see something like '''Don'\\t''' or '''Don\\'t''', report it to AIV immediately for indef blocking :) HTH.. Send me an email at <> (you know what to remove ;) ) if you need anything while I'm away. Bye! :) --[[User:Deon555|D]]<font color=\"green\">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Hey Sarah, you just got in before my Wikibreak :). Yes, that's definetly true. Here's some references: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk_archive/Science/2006_July_3#Open_proxy](read the last dot point), [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Lightbringer#WinterMan_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29.2C_Guizarres_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29](first sentence under Feb), [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/BillyBong] (read first sentence), [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Rockumsockum] (second paragraph). That should be enough to convince someone ;). But yeah, if you see something like '''Don'\t''' or '''Don\'t''', report it to AIV immediately for indef blocking :) HTH.. Send me an email at <> (you know what to remove ;) ) if you need anything while I'm away. Bye! :) --[[User:Deon555|D]]<font color="green">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User:Deon555|on555]]<sup><font color="purple">[[User_talk:Deon555|'''talk''']]</font></sup><sub>[[WP:ER#User:Deon555|Review]]</sub> 22:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

534957 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534957 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-26 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.146113040E09 +++$+++ Ilir, as long as you behave in a civil way I have no problem talking to you or anyone. Well, just for the record, I do not hate Albanians or else. I have absolutely no idea why are you coming out with that now. I told you before, I have not expressed my opinion on Kosov@, as this is irrelevant indeed. The point is the current situation is that ''de iure'', Kosovo is still part of Serbia & Montenegro. We can talk later, I need to earn my living tomorrow and off to bed now. Cheerio,  +++$+++ Ilir, as long as you behave in a civil way I have no problem talking to you or anyone. Well, just for the record, I do not hate Albanians or else. I have absolutely no idea why are you coming out with that now. I told you before, I have not expressed my opinion on Kosov@, as this is irrelevant indeed. The point is the current situation is that ''de iure'', Kosovo is still part of Serbia & Montenegro. We can talk later, I need to earn my living tomorrow and off to bed now. Cheerio, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 21:44, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
534958 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534957 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-26 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.146117960E09 +++$+++ You needn't say it explicitly that you hate someone in particular, but checking your edits, and your pushy way of trying to make a (pro-Serbian) point, as well as supporting the Socialist Party of Serbia, which led wars that exterminated not only Albanians, does not leave me many options. Glad to hear you say explicitly you do not hate Albanians. Neither do I hate Serbs. I hate ALL those who committed crimes over anyone in my country. Many (realistic) Serbian politicians gave up on insisting the ''de jure'' issue, what makes you be so bound to that 1244 resolution? I encourage you to read further, in the UNMIK updated documents and statements from CG (Contact Group :)), and not instead cite a single document, or suspicious non-neutral sites. That would make you more acceptable with the opposite side (in which I am currently). G'luck. +++$+++ ::You needn't say it explicitly that you hate someone in particular, but checking your edits, and your pushy way of trying to make a (pro-Serbian) point, as well as supporting the Socialist Party of Serbia, which led wars that exterminated not only Albanians, does not leave me many options. Glad to hear you say explicitly you do not hate Albanians. Neither do I hate Serbs. I hate ALL those who committed crimes over anyone in my country. Many (realistic) Serbian politicians gave up on insisting the ''de jure'' issue, what makes you be so bound to that 1244 resolution? I encourage you to read further, in the UNMIK updated documents and statements from CG (Contact Group :)), and not instead cite a single document, or suspicious non-neutral sites. That would make you more acceptable with the opposite side (in which I am currently). G'luck.[[User:Ilir pz|Ilir pz]] 23:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

10670 +++$+++ Ambi +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-09-23 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.095931920E09 +++$+++ By the way, a bunch of us Australians have got together to try and eliminate some of the huge holes in Wikipedia's Australian coverage. If you're interested, it's at  [[Wikipedia:Australian wikipedians' notice board]].  +++$+++ By the way, a bunch of us Australians have got together to try and eliminate some of the huge holes in Wikipedia's Australian coverage. If you're interested, it's at  [[Wikipedia:Australian wikipedians' notice board]]. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 02:32, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
10671 +++$+++ Ambi +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10670 +++$+++ 10670 +++$+++ 2004-09-23 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.095936900E09 +++$+++ You wrote [[Breaker Morant]] too? Woah. I'll give that a bit of a copyedit when I get back, but that's pretty close to being featured-worthy already. The only problem I can see is that it does take the point of view that he was indeed a hero. For neutrality's sake, it'd be good to have some opposing views. It'd be nice to be able to get a public domain picture of him - which shouldn't be too hard considering he died in [[1902]].  +++$+++ :You wrote [[Breaker Morant]] too? Woah. I'll give that a bit of a copyedit when I get back, but that's pretty close to being featured-worthy already. The only problem I can see is that it does take the point of view that he was indeed a hero. For neutrality's sake, it'd be good to have some opposing views. It'd be nice to be able to get a public domain picture of him - which shouldn't be too hard considering he died in [[1902]]. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 03:55, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
10672 +++$+++ Ambi +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10670 +++$+++ 10671 +++$+++ 2004-09-23 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.095939120E09 +++$+++ I've got no particular opinions about the guy, and haven't studied it much, but it's generally a good idea if an article reflects all views, rather than taking a particular slant. You may well be right, but the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]] policy requires that little bit of neutrality. But like I said, it's a fantastic start, and really isn't far off being featured, I think, with a little bit more work.  +++$+++ ::I've got no particular opinions about the guy, and haven't studied it much, but it's generally a good idea if an article reflects all views, rather than taking a particular slant. You may well be right, but the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]] policy requires that little bit of neutrality. But like I said, it's a fantastic start, and really isn't far off being featured, I think, with a little bit more work. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 04:32, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

272816 +++$+++ Taxman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272816 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-19 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.158667980E09 +++$+++ You're now an admin, so have fun using your new tools to help the project. Be conservative with them at first, and re-read the policies before acting, and as you get the hang of it, jump in and help clear out the backlogs. Again, congrats. -  +++$+++ You're now an admin, so have fun using your new tools to help the project. Be conservative with them at first, and re-read the policies before acting, and as you get the hang of it, jump in and help clear out the backlogs. Again, congrats. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Taxman|Talk]]</small></sup> 05:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
272817 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272816 +++$+++ 272816 +++$+++ 2006-09-19 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.158668280E09 +++$+++ Congratulations, Sarah, very well deserved, .... and I must say I am relieved that you didn't overtake my tally....lol :) .''' +++$+++ :Congratulations, Sarah, very well deserved, .... and I must say I am relieved that you didn't overtake my tally....lol :) .'''[[User:Blnguyen|Blnguyen]]''' <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[User talk:Blnguyen|BLabberiNg]] 05:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
272818 +++$+++ Chacor +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272816 +++$+++ 272817 +++$+++ 2006-09-19 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.158680280E09 +++$+++ Many congratulations on your adminship. No problem with the nomination. You deserve it. &ndash;  +++$+++ ::Many congratulations on your adminship. No problem with the nomination. You deserve it. &ndash; [[User:Chacor|Ch]][[User talk:Chacor|acor]] 08:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
272819 +++$+++ Syrthiss +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272816 +++$+++ 272818 +++$+++ 2006-09-19 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.158700080E09 +++$+++ Congrats!  +++$+++ :::Congrats! [[User:Syrthiss|Syrthiss]] 14:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

10675 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-09-23 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.095972240E09 +++$+++ Might I just say: this is the finest piece of writing I have read yet on Wikipedia! If we can wikify it properly, have a few of my clarifications answered (see [[Talk:Breaker Morant|talk]]), find some appropriate photos and place it on peer review for a while to gather comments, then I reckon this could be a featured article!!! superb work, an interesting read and IMHO very well balanced. Please keep up the good work! -  +++$+++ Might I just say: this is the finest piece of writing I have read yet on Wikipedia! If we can wikify it properly, have a few of my clarifications answered (see [[Talk:Breaker Morant|talk]]), find some appropriate photos and place it on peer review for a while to gather comments, then I reckon this could be a featured article!!! superb work, an interesting read and IMHO very well balanced. Please keep up the good work! - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 13:44, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
10676 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10675 +++$+++ 10675 +++$+++ 2004-09-24 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.096020000E09 +++$+++ Hey, we keep losing information from this article! see http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/wiki.phtml?title=Breaker_Morant&diff=6112912&oldid=6111202 -  +++$+++ :Hey, we keep losing information from this article! see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Breaker_Morant&diff=6112912&oldid=6111202 - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 03:00, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
10677 +++$+++ Ambi +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10675 +++$+++ 10675 +++$+++ 2004-09-28 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.096356600E09 +++$+++ The same thing just happened again - I fixed the mass erasing of content, but I accidentally wiped out a couple of your edits in the process, I'm sorry.  +++$+++ :The same thing just happened again - I fixed the mass erasing of content, but I accidentally wiped out a couple of your edits in the process, I'm sorry. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 00:30, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
10678 +++$+++ Clarkk +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10675 +++$+++ 10675 +++$+++ 2005-02-24 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.109270460E09 +++$+++ hi dunks58, careful with your editing, it looks like you wiped out a huge chunk of your article [[Breaker Morant]] again on 28th of Jan 2005 (see http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Breaker_Morant&diff=9753902&oldid=9752699).  i realise that you refactored the court martial material to [[court martial of Breaker Morant]] (i moved the page), but it appears that you also inadvertantly (i presume) also deleted all the material ''after'' that section, including the reference section!  i have since readded it back (and preserved the edits after that date too).  does your browser have a bug or something?  i suggest regularly using the \"diff\" tool after you make your edits to make sure you are changing what you really think you are changing!  cheers  +++$+++ :hi dunks58, careful with your editing, it looks like you wiped out a huge chunk of your article [[Breaker Morant]] again on 28th of Jan 2005 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Breaker_Morant&diff=9753902&oldid=9752699).  i realise that you refactored the court martial material to [[court martial of Breaker Morant]] (i moved the page), but it appears that you also inadvertantly (i presume) also deleted all the material ''after'' that section, including the reference section!  i have since readded it back (and preserved the edits after that date too).  does your browser have a bug or something?  i suggest regularly using the "diff" tool after you make your edits to make sure you are changing what you really think you are changing!  cheers [[User:Clarkk|clarkk]] 10:41, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

272820 +++$+++ Funky Monkey +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272820 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-19 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.158668280E09 +++$+++ Well done on your admin status.  Hope the negative comments didn't put you off.  ps. Can I have the number of your \"publicist\" :-) -- +++$+++ Well done on your admin status.  Hope the negative comments didn't put you off.  ps. Can I have the number of your "publicist" :-) --[[User:Funky Monkey|<font style="background: #CC9900" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;Funky Monkey&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:Funky Monkey|<font style="background:#CD00CD" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</font>]] 05:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
272821 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272820 +++$+++ 272820 +++$+++ 2006-09-19 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.158684300E09 +++$+++ Bah, you only just scraped through! (joke, for the humorously challenged) Very well done, and enjoy the new buttons! -- +++$+++ :Bah, you only just scraped through! (joke, for the humorously challenged) Very well done, and enjoy the new buttons! --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 09:45, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
272822 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272820 +++$+++ 272820 +++$+++ 2006-09-19 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.158685680E09 +++$+++ I guess it's my fault. I congratulated you not only early, but also in an unorthodox way (I didn't create a new section to avoid overcrowding your talk page). It was easily missed, but you discovered it all the same. If there's any advice I can give to newly crowned admins, it's to use your best judgement (it's gotten you this far, so keep it up), ask other admins whenever in doubt, and don't be afraid of making mistakes - we all do it. Welcome aboard. --  +++$+++ :I guess it's my fault. I congratulated you not only early, but also in an unorthodox way (I didn't create a new section to avoid overcrowding your talk page). It was easily missed, but you discovered it all the same. If there's any advice I can give to newly crowned admins, it's to use your best judgement (it's gotten you this far, so keep it up), ask other admins whenever in doubt, and don't be afraid of making mistakes - we all do it. Welcome aboard. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 10:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

569758 +++$+++ Majorly +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569758 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.173658080E09 +++$+++ Hope you had a nice break! :) ''' +++$+++ Hope you had a nice break! :) '''[[User:Majorly|<font color="blue">Majorly</font>]]''' <sub>[[User talk:Majorly|<font color="green">(o rly?)</font>]]</sub> 17:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
569759 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569758 +++$+++ 569758 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.173660720E09 +++$+++ Thank you!  It was very relaxing and I just have to shake off this cold at the same time as buckling down to some proper work, where I'm paid for it and here, too!  +++$+++ :Thank you!  It was very relaxing and I just have to shake off this cold at the same time as buckling down to some proper work, where I'm paid for it and here, too! [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 17:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

534966 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534966 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-28 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.146270900E09 +++$+++ As far as I see it, you are having a content dispute with Manojlo. It does not help to call people a vandal, but this is just my advice. Usually, it makes people angrier indeed. Nevertheless, I will leave a note on his talk page about using the talk page before major edits. Regards, -- +++$+++ As far as I see it, you are having a content dispute with Manojlo. It does not help to call people a vandal, but this is just my advice. Usually, it makes people angrier indeed. Nevertheless, I will leave a note on his talk page about using the talk page before major edits. Regards, --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 17:35, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
534967 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534966 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-28 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.146276960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for doing what you did. I made a mistake by calling him a vandal. Hope he stops the revert-war and wikipedianizes, like all of us did gradually (including myself) :) Regards  +++$+++ :::Thanks for doing what you did. I made a mistake by calling him a vandal. Hope he stops the revert-war and wikipedianizes, like all of us did gradually (including myself) :) Regards [[User:Ilir pz|Ilir pz]] 19:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

613449 +++$+++ Jayvdb +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613449 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-13 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.229158140E09 +++$+++ Hi, I presume your oppose relates to [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008\/Candidate_statements\/Jayvdb\/Questions_for_the_candidate#Questions_from_Badger_Drink|Questions from Badger Drink]] .. I have provided an outline answer regarding a few of the imperfect cases, mostly linking to longer answers to other questions.  Sorry for the delay. --<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ Hi, I presume your oppose relates to [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008/Candidate_statements/Jayvdb/Questions_for_the_candidate#Questions_from_Badger_Drink|Questions from Badger Drink]] .. I have provided an outline answer regarding a few of the imperfect cases, mostly linking to longer answers to other questions.  Sorry for the delay. --<span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Jayvdb|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:Jayvdb|chat]])'''</sup></span> 00:49, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
613450 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613449 +++$+++ 613449 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.229188800E09 +++$+++ Thanks, John, that was part of it and I'll carefully review your more detailed responses. . .  +++$+++ :Thanks, John, that was part of it and I'll carefully review your more detailed responses. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:20, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

272824 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272824 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-19 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.158687660E09 +++$+++ Congrats Sarah on such a successful RfA and have fun with your new tools! (and the power that comes with it :-) \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ Congrats Sarah on such a successful RfA and have fun with your new tools! (and the power that comes with it :-) —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 10:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
272825 +++$+++ Deepujoseph +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272824 +++$+++ 272824 +++$+++ 2006-09-19 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.158702840E09 +++$+++ From me too. All the best with the new tools! :-) --[[User:Deepujoseph| thund]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Deepujoseph\/Esperanza|e]]<\/font> +++$+++ :From me too. All the best with the new tools! :-) --[[User:Deepujoseph| thund]]<font color="green">[[User:Deepujoseph/Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User:Deepujoseph|rboltz]]<sup><font color="green">[[user_talk:Deepujoseph|(Deepu)]]</font></sup> 14:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

534969 +++$+++ Manojlo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-28 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.146275040E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Manojlo|Manojlo]] 18:44, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
534970 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534969 +++$+++ 534969 +++$+++ 2006-04-29 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.146313680E09 +++$+++ Hi Manojlo, The problem is you used the same tag (<nowiki><ref><\/nowiki>) twice. You need to use <nowiki><ref><\/nowiki> and then close it with <nowiki><\/ref><\/nowiki>. -- +++$+++ :Hi Manojlo, The problem is you used the same tag (<nowiki><ref></nowiki>) twice. You need to use <nowiki><ref></nowiki> and then close it with <nowiki></ref></nowiki>. --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 05:28, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

272827 +++$+++ KarateLady +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272827 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-19 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.158700200E09 +++$+++ Your work is outstanding. You deserve all you receive in life. Thank you for your patience with my newbieness, for your attention to details, and for your kind and thoughtful gestures. We are fortunate to have you on here. Best wishes, KarateLady +++$+++ Your work is outstanding. You deserve all you receive in life. Thank you for your patience with my newbieness, for your attention to details, and for your kind and thoughtful gestures. We are fortunate to have you on here. Best wishes, KarateLady[[User:KarateLady|KarateLady]] 14:10, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
272828 +++$+++ Tachikoma +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272827 +++$+++ 272827 +++$+++ 2006-09-19 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.158700440E09 +++$+++ Hello, Sarah. I've seen your name a lot on Wikipedia recent changes, and I wanted to congratulate you as well, especially before your talk page gets crowded. --[[User:Tachikoma|Kyok]] +++$+++ :Hello, Sarah. I've seen your name a lot on Wikipedia recent changes, and I wanted to congratulate you as well, especially before your talk page gets crowded. --[[User:Tachikoma|Kyok]][[User:Tachikoma/Esperanza|<font color="green">o</font>]] 14:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

10685 +++$+++ Design +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-04 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.152009720E09 +++$+++ Dunks, I'd like to suggest you heavily reduce the Master's article and refer readers to Milesago for further info. I reckon the current article is too long and has too much trivia for an encyclopedia article.  cheers  +++$+++ Dunks, I'd like to suggest you heavily reduce the Master's article and refer readers to Milesago for further info. I reckon the current article is too long and has too much trivia for an encyclopedia article.  cheers [[User:Design|Design]] 03:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
10686 +++$+++ Design +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10685 +++$+++ 10685 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.154596560E09 +++$+++ Hello again Dunks, I haven't heard from you regarding my above comments on [[The Masters Apprentices]], I would say the same for [[Dinah Lee]]. I guess maybe you have been cut & pasting many of your Milesago pages into Wikipedia. I still reckon you should cut them down for Wikipedia (too much non-encylopedic detail) and provide a link to Milesago. Hey, I love Milesago, but think for Wikipedia the articles should be more \"readable\". cheers -- +++$+++ :Hello again Dunks, I haven't heard from you regarding my above comments on [[The Masters Apprentices]], I would say the same for [[Dinah Lee]]. I guess maybe you have been cut & pasting many of your Milesago pages into Wikipedia. I still reckon you should cut them down for Wikipedia (too much non-encylopedic detail) and provide a link to Milesago. Hey, I love Milesago, but think for Wikipedia the articles should be more "readable". cheers --[[User:Design|Design]] 02:16, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

272830 +++$+++ Coroebus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272830 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-19 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.158705540E09 +++$+++ Re: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Angela_Beesley&curid=5966703&diff=76595769&oldid=76592418 this], can I presume you'll be posting to talk soon? -- +++$+++ Re: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angela_Beesley&curid=5966703&diff=76595769&oldid=76592418 this], can I presume you'll be posting to talk soon? --[[User:Coroebus|Coroebus]] 15:39, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
272831 +++$+++ Coroebus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272830 +++$+++ 272830 +++$+++ 2006-09-20 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.158761280E09 +++$+++ Since you have not explained your reasons for that revert on the talk page I have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Angela_Beesley&diff=76744714&oldid=76595769 restored] a version of it, [[User:The bainer]] has kindly explained his reasons for reverting but I do not think they are justified. -- +++$+++ :Since you have not explained your reasons for that revert on the talk page I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angela_Beesley&diff=76744714&oldid=76595769 restored] a version of it, [[User:The bainer]] has kindly explained his reasons for reverting but I do not think they are justified. --[[User:Coroebus|Coroebus]] 07:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

534975 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534975 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-02 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.146637140E09 +++$+++ There is no need to. We all, me the first, make mistakes. Best wishes, -- +++$+++ There is no need to. We all, me the first, make mistakes. Best wishes, --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 23:19, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
534976 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534975 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.147625400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the smiley.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the smiley. [[User:Ilir pz|Ilir pz]] 09:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
534977 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534975 +++$+++ 534975 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.149059220E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Woohookitty&diff=prev&oldid=56031693 I gave] you the credits here, but you tend to rush a bit. \"The user above...\"  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Woohookitty&diff=prev&oldid=56031693 I gave] you the credits here, but you tend to rush a bit. "The user above..." [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 00:07, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
534978 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534975 +++$+++ 534977 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.149097560E09 +++$+++ Your impressions about me are completely wrong. I had to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Ilir_pz&diff=prev&oldid=56107197 answer] you, even though once I thought of ignoring your accusations. I do not know where you got all this?! Check my user page. And yes, I proved you wrong in all your accusations.  +++$+++ ::Your impressions about me are completely wrong. I had to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ilir_pz&diff=prev&oldid=56107197 answer] you, even though once I thought of ignoring your accusations. I do not know where you got all this?! Check my user page. And yes, I proved you wrong in all your accusations. [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 10:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
534979 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534975 +++$+++ 534978 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.149102780E09 +++$+++ No accusations whatsoever, your comments gave the wrong impression (i.e. being happy with page staying protected). I replied to the rest on your talk page. [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::No accusations whatsoever, your comments gave the wrong impression (i.e. being happy with page staying protected). I replied to the rest on your talk page. [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 12:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
534980 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534975 +++$+++ 534977 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.149104100E09 +++$+++ Why don't you actually ask about what I meant by my comments, instead of speculating what I might have thought, and wasting energy on sending accusation-like comments? Could be better, don't you think? I will reply to the rest in my talk page.  +++$+++ ::Why don't you actually ask about what I meant by my comments, instead of speculating what I might have thought, and wasting energy on sending accusation-like comments? Could be better, don't you think? I will reply to the rest in my talk page. [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 12:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

272832 +++$+++ Cactus.man +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-19 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.158716220E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, congratulations and well done on your RfA. Sorry I missed it, when I finally rolled up to vote, it was already closed ''':'''-( ... my voice [[WP:100|wasn't needed anyway]]. Good luck with the mop and bucket. All the best. --<font color=\"2B7A2B\"> +++$+++ Hi Sarah, congratulations and well done on your RfA. Sorry I missed it, when I finally rolled up to vote, it was already closed ''':'''-( ... my voice [[WP:100|wasn't needed anyway]]. Good luck with the mop and bucket. All the best. --<font color="2B7A2B">[[User:Cactus.man|Cactus'''.'''man]]</font> <font size="4">[[User talk:Cactus.man|<span class="Unicode">&#9997;</span>]]</font> 18:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
272833 +++$+++ Cactus.man +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272832 +++$+++ 272832 +++$+++ 2006-09-19 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.158719400E09 +++$+++ Glad you liked the photos, they usually cheer me up when WikiRioting happens. See you around. Cheers. --<font color=\"2B7A2B\"> +++$+++ :Glad you liked the photos, they usually cheer me up when WikiRioting happens. See you around. Cheers. --<font color="2B7A2B">[[User:Cactus.man|Cactus'''.'''man]]</font> <font size="4">[[User talk:Cactus.man|<span class="Unicode">&#9997;</span>]]</font> 19:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

613451 +++$+++ Aunt Entropy +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613451 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-21 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.229854380E09 +++$+++ Can't recall, did you vote in the recent elections? I feel kind of blindsided by the appointments. For some reason, I was under the impression there were seven seats open, and I made my voting strategy accordingly. Two of the additional appointments are going to be trouble: I see one as a mini-FT2 and the other as a every troll's favorite pushover. It probably wouldn't have helped, but I still feel irritated by the whole experience: a familiar feeling regarding Arbcom unfortunately... :P   +++$+++ Can't recall, did you vote in the recent elections? I feel kind of blindsided by the appointments. For some reason, I was under the impression there were seven seats open, and I made my voting strategy accordingly. Two of the additional appointments are going to be trouble: I see one as a mini-FT2 and the other as a every troll's favorite pushover. It probably wouldn't have helped, but I still feel irritated by the whole experience: a familiar feeling regarding Arbcom unfortunately... :P  [[User:Aunt Entropy|Aunt Entropy]] ([[User talk:Aunt Entropy|talk]]) 02:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
613452 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613451 +++$+++ 613451 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 09:27:00 +++$+++ 1.229880420E09 +++$+++ Certainly did vote, but left it late and tried to review the answers carefully, and was also working on the assumption of seven seats. My votes tended to be negative, as some candidates didn't seem to understand policy, at least from my viewpoint, but I didn't feel they were entirely bad and don't feel that unhappy with the outcome. It may be ignorance on my part, but there definitely seemed to be strong support in the election for people I respect. Like you, I've reservations about a couple of the appointments, but am hopeful that they'll behave well and that voices of reason will be a majority in discussions. At the least we should get away from the \"make an example of good contributors who are a bit rude occasionally\" mentality, but we'll just have to wait and see. Guess I'm pleased because it could have been much worse. The joys of pessimism. .  +++$+++ :Certainly did vote, but left it late and tried to review the answers carefully, and was also working on the assumption of seven seats. My votes tended to be negative, as some candidates didn't seem to understand policy, at least from my viewpoint, but I didn't feel they were entirely bad and don't feel that unhappy with the outcome. It may be ignorance on my part, but there definitely seemed to be strong support in the election for people I respect. Like you, I've reservations about a couple of the appointments, but am hopeful that they'll behave well and that voices of reason will be a majority in discussions. At the least we should get away from the "make an example of good contributors who are a bit rude occasionally" mentality, but we'll just have to wait and see. Guess I'm pleased because it could have been much worse. The joys of pessimism. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:27, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

10692 +++$+++ Adam Bishop +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-16 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.137457440E09 +++$+++ Hi, I removed the text you added to the Monterey Festival article, since it was taken froom the Milesago site...but then I realized you probably wrote it on Milesago too. Did you? If so, I think it might still be a problem, since there is a copyright notice on the Milesago page, which doesn't match the [[GFDL]] that Wikipedia uses.  +++$+++ Hi, I removed the text you added to the Monterey Festival article, since it was taken froom the Milesago site...but then I realized you probably wrote it on Milesago too. Did you? If so, I think it might still be a problem, since there is a copyright notice on the Milesago page, which doesn't match the [[GFDL]] that Wikipedia uses. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] 16:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
10693 +++$+++ Adam Bishop +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10692 +++$+++ 10692 +++$+++ 2006-01-16 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.137458400E09 +++$+++ Well, it's your copyright on Milesago, but not here - if you add it here, it's no longer \"yours\", and other people can change it or even copy it to another site and make a profit off of it. If you don't care about that, I suppose it's fine.  +++$+++ :Well, it's your copyright on Milesago, but not here - if you add it here, it's no longer "yours", and other people can change it or even copy it to another site and make a profit off of it. If you don't care about that, I suppose it's fine. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] 16:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

394998 +++$+++ Codrdan +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 394998 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-14 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.268611320E09 +++$+++ The first sentence you added was redundant with \"(but not necessarily content)\", so I consolidated them.  Also, \"narrower scope\" is vague, and the scope is already described in the first sentence.  The second sentence you added is covered by the sentence about proofreading, but I like \"the editorial cycle\" more than \"final publication\", because it's more general.  Your \"authority\" sentence fits in with the \"sub\" terminology in the second paragraph, so I moved it there.  Please let me know if there's anything else you think should be changed. &mdash; +++$+++ The first sentence you added was redundant with "(but not necessarily content)", so I consolidated them.  Also, "narrower scope" is vague, and the scope is already described in the first sentence.  The second sentence you added is covered by the sentence about proofreading, but I like "the editorial cycle" more than "final publication", because it's more general.  Your "authority" sentence fits in with the "sub" terminology in the second paragraph, so I moved it there.  Please let me know if there's anything else you think should be changed. &mdash;[[User:Codrdan|Codrdan]] ([[User talk:Codrdan|talk]]) 17:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
394999 +++$+++ Codrdan +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 394998 +++$+++ 394998 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.268612880E09 +++$+++ Great, that looks fine. &mdash; +++$+++ :Great, that looks fine. &mdash;[[User:Codrdan|Codrdan]] ([[User talk:Codrdan|talk]]) 17:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

569761 +++$+++ CattleGirl +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-15 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.173967740E09 +++$+++ Hi. I saw that you were free to do admin coaching, and I'd like to request you as a coach. Generally I revert vandalism, and I've been hanging around AFD and TFD discussions a lot more, as well as welcoming new users as I see them. I'd like to be an administrator when I believe I'm ready- a few months, maybe? But I'd like to know more about adminship through the admin coaching program before I submit an RFA. Interested in coaching me? Cheers- '''[[User:CattleGirl|<font color=\"blue\">Cat<\/font><font color=\"darkblue\">tleG<\/font><font color=\"black\">irl<\/font>]]''' <sup>''[[User talk: CattleGirl| talk]] |  +++$+++ Hi. I saw that you were free to do admin coaching, and I'd like to request you as a coach. Generally I revert vandalism, and I've been hanging around AFD and TFD discussions a lot more, as well as welcoming new users as I see them. I'd like to be an administrator when I believe I'm ready- a few months, maybe? But I'd like to know more about adminship through the admin coaching program before I submit an RFA. Interested in coaching me? Cheers- '''[[User:CattleGirl|<font color="blue">Cat</font><font color="darkblue">tleG</font><font color="black">irl</font>]]''' <sup>''[[User talk: CattleGirl| talk]] | [[User:CattleGirl/Autograph Book|sign!]]''</sup> 07:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
569762 +++$+++ CattleGirl +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569761 +++$+++ 569761 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.175066040E09 +++$+++ Been offered coaching by another user. Cheers- '''[[User:CattleGirl|<font color=\"blue\">Cat<\/font><font color=\"darkblue\">tleG<\/font><font color=\"black\">irl<\/font>]]''' <sup>''[[User talk: CattleGirl| talk]] |  +++$+++ :Been offered coaching by another user. Cheers- '''[[User:CattleGirl|<font color="blue">Cat</font><font color="darkblue">tleG</font><font color="black">irl</font>]]''' <sup>''[[User talk: CattleGirl| talk]] | [[User:CattleGirl/Autograph Book|sign!]]''</sup> 00:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

272841 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-21 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.158871440E09 +++$+++ You're welcome, Sarah, and congratulations on the resounding support you got, which you thoroughly deserve. :-)  +++$+++ You're welcome, Sarah, and congratulations on the resounding support you got, which you thoroughly deserve. :-) [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 13:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
272842 +++$+++ Bhadani +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272841 +++$+++ 272841 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.158872340E09 +++$+++ Oh a surprise to see the SV here. So, I wish both the ladies all the best! Thank you Sarah for your note of confidence. However, the ''other person'' was entitled to his opinion! -- +++$+++ :Oh a surprise to see the SV here. So, I wish both the ladies all the best! Thank you Sarah for your note of confidence. However, the ''other person'' was entitled to his opinion! --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] 13:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

534987 +++$+++ CanadianCaesar +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-06 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.146950100E09 +++$+++ That's OK.  I was confused by the whole thing myself.  That's the first time I ever speedied a stub type.  It would seem to me to be a useful stub type too, but what do I know...  +++$+++ That's OK.  I was confused by the whole thing myself.  That's the first time I ever speedied a stub type.  It would seem to me to be a useful stub type too, but what do I know... [[User:CanadianCaesar|CanadianCaesar]] <small>[[User_talk:CanadianCaesar|Et tu, Brute?]]</small> 14:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
534988 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 534987 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-06 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.146950220E09 +++$+++ I agree. The problem is that it leads to edit wars, instead people expanding the articles instead... Cheers, -- +++$+++ ::I agree. The problem is that it leads to edit wars, instead people expanding the articles instead... Cheers, --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 14:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

272844 +++$+++ Andypandy.UK +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272844 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-21 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.158899400E09 +++$+++ Well done, but.. YOU MISSED A QUESTION! Oh dear!--<font style=\"background:white\"> +++$+++ Well done, but.. YOU MISSED A QUESTION! Oh dear!--<font style="background:white">[[User:Andypandy.UK|Andeh]]</font> 21:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
272845 +++$+++ Junglecat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272844 +++$+++ 272844 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.158903600E09 +++$+++ Oh my! What to do??? <small>Tyrenius, please don't clobber me for saying this!<\/small> It is now a piece of Wiki history.  +++$+++ :Oh my! What to do??? <small>Tyrenius, please don't clobber me for saying this!</small> It is now a piece of Wiki history. [[User:Junglecat|<font color="green">JungleCat</font>]]  <small>[[User talk:Junglecat|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Junglecat|<font color="blue">contrib</font>]]</small> 22:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

272846 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-21 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.158897660E09 +++$+++ You blocked the above for 48 hours. He's just come off a 2 week block for abuse and has gone on another spree of personal attacks. He is also [[User:Tonetare]] and our old friend [[User:TareTone]]. He seems unable to work harmoniously with others. I think at least a month block and preferably 6 months would be in order, as I can't see anything other than continued abuse from him.  +++$+++ You blocked the above for 48 hours. He's just come off a 2 week block for abuse and has gone on another spree of personal attacks. He is also [[User:Tonetare]] and our old friend [[User:TareTone]]. He seems unable to work harmoniously with others. I think at least a month block and preferably 6 months would be in order, as I can't see anything other than continued abuse from him. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 21:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
272847 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272846 +++$+++ 272846 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.158898980E09 +++$+++ Just got email and replied.  +++$+++ :Just got email and replied. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 21:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

272849 +++$+++ KarateLady +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-21 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.158901320E09 +++$+++ Sarah, when listing books on bio pages, how do I list a book that has more than one ISBN number? For example, on the article Hal Higdon, he had a book published in 1975 but it was re-released in 1999. Now the same book has two different ISBN numbers. Which one do I use? KarateLady +++$+++ Sarah, when listing books on bio pages, how do I list a book that has more than one ISBN number? For example, on the article Hal Higdon, he had a book published in 1975 but it was re-released in 1999. Now the same book has two different ISBN numbers. Which one do I use? KarateLady[[User:KarateLady|KarateLady]] 22:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
272850 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272849 +++$+++ 272849 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.158903120E09 +++$+++ My instinct is to go for the first edition, unless there is a particular reason to choose the later one or even both.  +++$+++ :My instinct is to go for the first edition, unless there is a particular reason to choose the later one or even both. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 22:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

10707 +++$+++ GentlemanGhost +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-12 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.178959800E09 +++$+++ Hello Duncan, I see that this article is largely based on your Milesago.com article. I also see that in a similar case, [[Stewie Speer]], you gave permission to use the content and this was verified by the [[Wikimedia:Communication committee]]. Was that permission limited to the individual article or did it apply to all the articles from your website? -- +++$+++ Hello Duncan, I see that this article is largely based on your Milesago.com article. I also see that in a similar case, [[Stewie Speer]], you gave permission to use the content and this was verified by the [[Wikimedia:Communication committee]]. Was that permission limited to the individual article or did it apply to all the articles from your website? --[[User:GentlemanGhost|GentlemanGhost]] 01:50, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
10708 +++$+++ GentlemanGhost +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10707 +++$+++ 10707 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.180773000E09 +++$+++ Hi, Dunks. Thanks for the clarification. At first I had thought that someone was ripping you off by transcribing the Whitaker article here. But, I eventually figured out that you were putting your own work on Wikipedia, which put me more at ease. However, there seems to have been some miscommunication somewhere along the way. In my research, I contacted the admin, [[User:Shell Kinney]], who put up the note saying that you had OK'd the use of the Stewie Speer info. As per ShellKinney, OTRS never got the confirmation email from milesago.com saying that it was OK to use the information that you had transcribed here. So, technically, I think we're still in a copyvio situation for both articles. You might want to send another email to OTRS. As as side note, I am sorry to hear about the (unrelated) plagiarism. If you sue the book's \"author\", I hope you get a lot of money. Anyway, thanks for all your hard work! -- +++$+++ :Hi, Dunks. Thanks for the clarification. At first I had thought that someone was ripping you off by transcribing the Whitaker article here. But, I eventually figured out that you were putting your own work on Wikipedia, which put me more at ease. However, there seems to have been some miscommunication somewhere along the way. In my research, I contacted the admin, [[User:Shell Kinney]], who put up the note saying that you had OK'd the use of the Stewie Speer info. As per ShellKinney, OTRS never got the confirmation email from milesago.com saying that it was OK to use the information that you had transcribed here. So, technically, I think we're still in a copyvio situation for both articles. You might want to send another email to OTRS. As as side note, I am sorry to hear about the (unrelated) plagiarism. If you sue the book's "author", I hope you get a lot of money. Anyway, thanks for all your hard work! --[[User:GentlemanGhost|GentlemanGhost]] 01:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

272853 +++$+++ Zoe +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272853 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-21 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.158907260E09 +++$+++ Welcome to the list of rouge admins.  :)   +++$+++ Welcome to the list of rouge admins.  :)  [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|(talk)]] 23:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
272854 +++$+++ Mike 7 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272853 +++$+++ 272853 +++$+++ 2006-09-22 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.158917280E09 +++$+++ Congratulations!  +++$+++ :Congratulations! [[User:Mike 7|Michael]] 02:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
272855 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272853 +++$+++ 272854 +++$+++ 2006-09-22 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.158923520E09 +++$+++ I second that. :) &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ ::I second that. :) &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</span> 04:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
272856 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272853 +++$+++ 272855 +++$+++ 2006-09-22 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.158967320E09 +++$+++ And I third it. (Or fourth it, I think?)  +++$+++ :::And I third it. (Or fourth it, I think?) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

272857 +++$+++ EyeMD +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-22 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.158931140E09 +++$+++ Cheers!! Many congratulations indeed. Its an amazing tally that you got :-) You certainly deserve it. And indeed, as you guessed, I had been wondering about removing the history and diffs leading back to my personal info of my user page. Could you kindly remove the history from there, so that no one can look back at that info again. Thanks and congratulations again :-)  +++$+++ Cheers!! Many congratulations indeed. Its an amazing tally that you got :-) You certainly deserve it. And indeed, as you guessed, I had been wondering about removing the history and diffs leading back to my personal info of my user page. Could you kindly remove the history from there, so that no one can look back at that info again. Thanks and congratulations again :-) [[User:EyeMD|EyeMD]] 06:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
272858 +++$+++ EyeMD +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272857 +++$+++ 272857 +++$+++ 2006-09-22 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.158933420E09 +++$+++ I just edited my userpage (prolly after you left), so you can remove the rest of the history (including what the bot did) at your convenience. Am leaving town today evening for OPD & surgeries on Saturday. Be back at a later time. Thanks again :-)  +++$+++ :I just edited my userpage (prolly after you left), so you can remove the rest of the history (including what the bot did) at your convenience. Am leaving town today evening for OPD & surgeries on Saturday. Be back at a later time. Thanks again :-) [[User:EyeMD|EyeMD]] 06:57, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
272859 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272857 +++$+++ 272857 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks, you'll do a great job. Auroranorth 11:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :Thanks, you'll do a great job. Auroranorth 11:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

535003 +++$+++ Koavf +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535003 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-14 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.147645980E09 +++$+++ ===>'''Other than [[Pet Sounds]]''' Mine's probably [[Smile (Brian Wilson album)|Smile]]. Much [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] to you to, good buddy. - +++$+++ ===>'''Other than [[Pet Sounds]]''' Mine's probably [[Smile (Brian Wilson album)|Smile]]. Much [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] to you to, good buddy. -[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]], [[User talk:Koavf|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|mail]] 15:33, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
535004 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535003 +++$+++ 535003 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.147649100E09 +++$+++ Sorry, what I mean is that in [[Andalusia]], you included a link to [[List of Andalusians]]. Wouldn't it make more sense to link to the category Andalusian people instead?-- +++$+++ :Sorry, what I mean is that in [[Andalusia]], you included a link to [[List of Andalusians]]. Wouldn't it make more sense to link to the category Andalusian people instead?--[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 16:25, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
535005 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535003 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.147649760E09 +++$+++ Aha! What about adding an extra line to the bottom of [[List of Andalusians]] saying <nowiki>{{main|:Category:Andalusian people}}<\/nowiki>? Does it make sense to you? Thanks, -- +++$+++ :::Aha! What about adding an extra line to the bottom of [[List of Andalusians]] saying <nowiki>{{main|:Category:Andalusian people}}</nowiki>? Does it make sense to you? Thanks, --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 16:36, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

272860 +++$+++ DVD R W +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-23 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.159080120E09 +++$+++ Congratulations from me too :-) though I didn't get a thank you letter :-(  +++$+++ Congratulations from me too :-) though I didn't get a thank you letter :-( [[User:DVD R W| DVD]]+[[User_talk:DVD R W| R/W]] 23:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
272861 +++$+++ DVD R W +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272860 +++$+++ 272860 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.159081440E09 +++$+++ Ok, I understand, and thought it might have been because of the high voter turnout. Sorry for not being patient. Enjoy all the userpages. See ya around :-)  +++$+++ :Ok, I understand, and thought it might have been because of the high voter turnout. Sorry for not being patient. Enjoy all the userpages. See ya around :-) [[User:DVD R W| DVD]]+[[User_talk:DVD R W| R/W]] 00:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

176549 +++$+++ Tanner-Christopher +++$+++ Macrakis +++$+++ 176549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-27 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.177673760E09 +++$+++ It is however not appropriate to blank the entire top portion of an article unless you are going to properly rewrite it.  Please do not do that again, it is not constructive to the overall article.-- +++$+++ It is however not appropriate to blank the entire top portion of an article unless you are going to properly rewrite it.  Please do not do that again, it is not constructive to the overall article.--[[User:Tanner-Christopher|Christopher Tanner, CCC]] 04:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
176550 +++$+++ Tanner-Christopher +++$+++ Macrakis +++$+++ 176549 +++$+++ 176549 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.177715820E09 +++$+++ You are correct, I apologize for my hastiness and rudeness yesterday, inexcusable.  I do like the word history edit, I'm just used to having more on the top of the article and I think I may change the wording as a Chef is one who cooks professionally; not \"is a professional cook\",it is more accurate because a \"cook\" is a professional as well and is part of the article.  Thanks for the help and again I apologize for my abrupt behavior, the end of the semester is here and I'm writing five term papers for five grad classes.-- +++$+++ :You are correct, I apologize for my hastiness and rudeness yesterday, inexcusable.  I do like the word history edit, I'm just used to having more on the top of the article and I think I may change the wording as a Chef is one who cooks professionally; not "is a professional cook",it is more accurate because a "cook" is a professional as well and is part of the article.  Thanks for the help and again I apologize for my abrupt behavior, the end of the semester is here and I'm writing five term papers for five grad classes.--[[User:Tanner-Christopher|Christopher Tanner, CCC]] 16:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
176551 +++$+++ Tanner-Christopher +++$+++ Macrakis +++$+++ 176549 +++$+++ 176550 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.177822260E09 +++$+++ Would it not be better for you to reword the section you removed instead of completely removing part of the article. In addition a chef's are not mostly found restaurants, they also work in hotels, banquet facilities, institutional settings (Ie. hospitals, nursing homes, schools etc.), which is why \"professional kitchen\" is a better descriptor than [[restaurant]]. -- +++$+++ ::Would it not be better for you to reword the section you removed instead of completely removing part of the article. In addition a chef's are not mostly found restaurants, they also work in hotels, banquet facilities, institutional settings (Ie. hospitals, nursing homes, schools etc.), which is why "professional kitchen" is a better descriptor than [[restaurant]]. --[[User:Tanner-Christopher|Christopher Tanner, CCC]] 21:51, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
176552 +++$+++ Tanner-Christopher +++$+++ Macrakis +++$+++ 176549 +++$+++ 176549 +++$+++ 2007-04-29 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.177831320E09 +++$+++ I'm not to fond of the Davidson entry on Chef actually.  Although some of the information is interesting, items such as a fast-food cook being called a chef is highly inaccurate and insulting for those of us who are chefs.  There is quite a bit of POV in the book overall, which is especially interesting for an Oxford Press book, which for many of its other publications would not be so inaccurate.  I added most of the information on that page in an attempt to get rid of the useless POV information that was on there previously, in that hast that information went in probably with little edit at 1 am one day I'm sure.  That information from Davidson you removed I actually reread and realized it is not entirely accurate and is too \"broad\" in its statement.-- +++$+++ :I'm not to fond of the Davidson entry on Chef actually.  Although some of the information is interesting, items such as a fast-food cook being called a chef is highly inaccurate and insulting for those of us who are chefs.  There is quite a bit of POV in the book overall, which is especially interesting for an Oxford Press book, which for many of its other publications would not be so inaccurate.  I added most of the information on that page in an attempt to get rid of the useless POV information that was on there previously, in that hast that information went in probably with little edit at 1 am one day I'm sure.  That information from Davidson you removed I actually reread and realized it is not entirely accurate and is too "broad" in its statement.--[[User:Tanner-Christopher|Christopher Tanner, CCC]] 00:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

272865 +++$+++ I@n +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272865 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.159122780E09 +++$+++ Sarah, a belated well done!  Regards --  +++$+++ Sarah, a belated well done!  Regards -- [[User talk:I@n|I@n]] 11:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
272866 +++$+++ I@n +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272865 +++$+++ 272865 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.159123260E09 +++$+++ Shhhh! ;) --  +++$+++ :Shhhh! ;) -- [[User talk:I@n|I@n]] 11:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

10722 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-12 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.189588860E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] 02:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
10723 +++$+++ Infrogmation +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10722 +++$+++ 10722 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.189589880E09 +++$+++ '''Do not''' \"copy and paste\" material from one title to another. This loses the article history and attribution, required for our licence! What to do if you think a page should be at another title? Use the move feature; see [[Wikipedia:How to move a page]] for details. --  +++$+++ : '''Do not''' "copy and paste" material from one title to another. This loses the article history and attribution, required for our licence! What to do if you think a page should be at another title? Use the move feature; see [[Wikipedia:How to move a page]] for details. -- [[User:Infrogmation|Infrogmation]] 02:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

272867 +++$+++ RedZebra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.159125900E09 +++$+++ Well deserved adminship. All the best.  +++$+++ Well deserved adminship. All the best. [[User:RedZebra|RedZebra]] 12:25, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
272868 +++$+++ HappyCamper +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272867 +++$+++ 272867 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.159139160E09 +++$+++ Ditto the above. Feel free to come by if you ever need a hand. :-) -- +++$+++ :Ditto the above. Feel free to come by if you ever need a hand. :-) --[[User:HappyCamper|HappyCamper]] 16:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

535013 +++$+++ Computerjoe +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-14 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.147660200E09 +++$+++ This newsletter was delivered by [[User:CJBot|CJBot]], written by [[User:Computerjoe|Computerjoe]], with technical help from [[User:Misza13|Misza13]].  +++$+++ This newsletter was delivered by [[User:CJBot|CJBot]], written by [[User:Computerjoe|Computerjoe]], with technical help from [[User:Misza13|Misza13]]. [[User:Computerjoe|Computerjoe]][[User talk:Computerjoe|<span style="color:red">'s talk</span>]] 19:30, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
535014 +++$+++ Computerjoe +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535013 +++$+++ 535013 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.147665780E09 +++$+++ You just missed the last one, so here it is and welcome!  +++$+++ :You just missed the last one, so here it is and welcome! [[User:Computerjoe|Computerjoe]][[User talk:Computerjoe|<span style="color:red">'s talk</span>]] 21:03, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
535015 +++$+++ Computerjoe +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535013 +++$+++ 535013 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.147665960E09 +++$+++ YW!  +++$+++ :YW! [[User:Computerjoe|Computerjoe]][[User talk:Computerjoe|<span style="color:red">'s talk</span>]] 21:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

272870 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272870 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.159141260E09 +++$+++ Congratulations, Sarah! All the best with the new tools. &mdash; ''' +++$+++ Congratulations, Sarah! All the best with the new tools. &mdash; '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana_dzasta]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:Riana_dzasta|wreak havoc]]'''|'''[[Special:Contributions/Riana_dzasta|damage report]] </sub> 16:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
272871 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272870 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.159141800E09 +++$+++ Cheers! I like the photo of your dog &ndash; mine don't sit still long enough to take photos. &mdash; '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana_dzasta]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:Riana_dzasta|wreak havoc]]'''|'''[[Special:Contributions\/Riana_dzasta|damage report]] <\/sub> 16:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC) <edit conflict> I see you've already got some admirers! *down there* &mdash; ''' +++$+++ ::Cheers! I like the photo of your dog &ndash; mine don't sit still long enough to take photos. &mdash; '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana_dzasta]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:Riana_dzasta|wreak havoc]]'''|'''[[Special:Contributions/Riana_dzasta|damage report]] </sub> 16:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC) <edit conflict> I see you've already got some admirers! *down there* &mdash; '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana_dzasta]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:Riana_dzasta|wreak havoc]]'''|'''[[Special:Contributions/Riana_dzasta|damage report]] </sub> 16:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
272872 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272870 +++$+++ 272870 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.159163100E09 +++$+++ More belated congrats!!!  Well done!!  You'll do a fine job! --  +++$+++ :More belated congrats!!!  Well done!!  You'll do a fine job! -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|'''Samir''' <small>धर्म</small>]] 22:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

535017 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-14 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.147670400E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I really miss it sometimes, mainly because the miserable British weather. Well, you cannot have everything in life... Cheers,  +++$+++ Thank you. I really miss it sometimes, mainly because the miserable British weather. Well, you cannot have everything in life... Cheers, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 22:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
535018 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535017 +++$+++ 535017 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.147670880E09 +++$+++ You asked me about Neum. I do not think that Neum should be considered part of Dalmatia. Unlike the Gulf of Kotor, Neum even was not part of historical Dalmatia (as were its borders in Habsburg Monarchy or in the Republic of Venetia). On the contrary, the ancient Roman Dalmatia included most of Bosnia, entire Montenegro, as well as parts of Serbia and Albania. History and geography are different things. :)  +++$+++ :You asked me about Neum. I do not think that Neum should be considered part of Dalmatia. Unlike the Gulf of Kotor, Neum even was not part of historical Dalmatia (as were its borders in Habsburg Monarchy or in the Republic of Venetia). On the contrary, the ancient Roman Dalmatia included most of Bosnia, entire Montenegro, as well as parts of Serbia and Albania. History and geography are different things. :) [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 22:28, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
535019 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535017 +++$+++ 535018 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.147671720E09 +++$+++ I got confused because Image:Croatia-Dalmatia.png. By the way, I have some images from Split that I could upload once I find the time to scan them. Thanks and good night, -- +++$+++ ::I got confused because Image:Croatia-Dalmatia.png. By the way, I have some images from Split that I could upload once I find the time to scan them. Thanks and good night, --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 22:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
535020 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535017 +++$+++ 535017 +++$+++ 2006-05-15 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.147697220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the smile you gave me, too (much needed whenever this whole Kosovo business flares up again, too... :)  +++$+++ *Thanks for the smile you gave me, too (much needed whenever this whole Kosovo business flares up again, too... :) [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 05:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

272874 +++$+++ Petrit Augustini +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272874 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.159145580E09 +++$+++ You can delete everything in 'About me', even i'ts talk page. -- +++$+++ You can delete everything in 'About me', even i'ts talk page. --[[User:Petrit Augustini|Aeternus]] 17:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
272875 +++$+++ Petrit Augustini +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272874 +++$+++ 272874 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.159145940E09 +++$+++ Thanks -- +++$+++ :Thanks --[[User:Petrit Augustini|Aeternus]] 17:59, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

482386 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-01 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.170378000E09 +++$+++ And another. He got my page, even, and typically nobody bothers vandalizing my boring page: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/GymLeader_Dalton]  +++$+++ And another. He got my page, even, and typically nobody bothers vandalizing my boring page: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/GymLeader_Dalton] [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 17:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
482387 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482386 +++$+++ 482386 +++$+++ 2007-02-01 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.170379800E09 +++$+++ Looks like another admin, {{user|Gwernol}}, issued a final warning and he hasn't done anything since.  I don't want to step on Gwernol's toes by blocking him anyway.  Let me know if he vandalizes anything else soon and I'll block him.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Looks like another admin, {{user|Gwernol}}, issued a final warning and he hasn't done anything since.  I don't want to step on Gwernol's toes by blocking him anyway.  Let me know if he vandalizes anything else soon and I'll block him.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 17:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
482388 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482386 +++$+++ 482387 +++$+++ 2007-02-01 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.170380220E09 +++$+++ 10-4.  +++$+++ ::10-4. [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 17:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

10734 +++$+++ JD554 +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10734 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-16 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.229451840E09 +++$+++ <s>An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Maladjusted.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion\/2008 December 16#Maladjusted.jpg|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<\/s> <!-- Template:Idw -->  +++$+++ <s>An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Maladjusted.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2008 December 16#Maladjusted.jpg|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}</s> <!-- Template:Idw --> [[User:JD554|JD554]] ([[User talk:JD554|talk]]) 10:24, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
10735 +++$+++ JD554 +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10734 +++$+++ 10734 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.229454540E09 +++$+++ I've withdrawn the nom. I noticed that another editor had uploaded a copyrighted image over the top of yours. I've reverted to your version. -- +++$+++ :I've withdrawn the nom. I noticed that another editor had uploaded a copyrighted image over the top of yours. I've reverted to your version. --[[User:JD554|JD554]] ([[User talk:JD554|talk]]) 11:09, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

535023 +++$+++ Bormalagurski +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-21 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.148202240E09 +++$+++ Hello. I have a feeling that Ilir will respond to this message because he is stalking me. Are there rules against that? Whenever I make a change that might not agree with his POV, he suddenly appears on that page, protesting my change and reverting it. I also have a lot of inside information, about his motives, his intentions and what he is actually doing with Wikipedia. I can bring him down, but I can't do it alone. I'm just asking you to show me where I can make my case, his sockpuppets, his reverting, his constant pushing of POV has harmed Wikipedia enough. I just need to know where I can have my voice heard. Please, don't respond over Wikipedia, e-mail me at bormalagurski@hotmail.com. -- +++$+++ Hello. I have a feeling that Ilir will respond to this message because he is stalking me. Are there rules against that? Whenever I make a change that might not agree with his POV, he suddenly appears on that page, protesting my change and reverting it. I also have a lot of inside information, about his motives, his intentions and what he is actually doing with Wikipedia. I can bring him down, but I can't do it alone. I'm just asking you to show me where I can make my case, his sockpuppets, his reverting, his constant pushing of POV has harmed Wikipedia enough. I just need to know where I can have my voice heard. Please, don't respond over Wikipedia, e-mail me at bormalagurski@hotmail.com. --[[User:Bormalagurski|<font color="#003399">'''serbiana'''</font>]] [[Yugoslavia|'''-''']] [[User_talk:Bormalagurski|<font color="#A61022">'''talk'''</font>]] 02:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
535024 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535023 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-21 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.148235960E09 +++$+++ Boris, do not get me wrong. I have no intention whatsoever to bring anyone down or else. There is a set of rules for everyone to abide. You need to cool down. This is really no way to have your voice heard, as you say. On the other hand, I have explained Ilir about wiki-stalking and he understands it now. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Boris, do not get me wrong. I have no intention whatsoever to bring anyone down or else. There is a set of rules for everyone to abide. You need to cool down. This is really no way to have your voice heard, as you say. On the other hand, I have explained Ilir about wiki-stalking and he understands it now. Regards, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 11:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
535025 +++$+++ Bormalagurski +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535023 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.148355720E09 +++$+++ He does not understand it, and he continues to do it. And it's not just wikistalking, he's doing all sorts of stuff he shouldn't be doing on Wikipedia, but I don't want to waste my proof on talk pages, I want to know where I can make my case. Thats all. --[[Image:Flag of Serbia.svg|20px]]  +++$+++ :::He does not understand it, and he continues to do it. And it's not just wikistalking, he's doing all sorts of stuff he shouldn't be doing on Wikipedia, but I don't want to waste my proof on talk pages, I want to know where I can make my case. Thats all. --[[Image:Flag of Serbia.svg|20px]] [[User:Bormalagurski|<font color="#003399">'''serbiana'''</font>]] [[Yugoslavia|'''-''']] [[User_talk:Bormalagurski|<font color="#A61022">'''talk'''</font>]] 20:42, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

272880 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272880 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-26 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.159300800E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. A few weeks back you took an interest in the article on [[Peter Dupas]]. I've done a fair bit of work tonight and expanded on this monsters article. If you can stomach his life story, would you mind taking a quick glance and suggest where the article may be lacking if you have time? There's quite a lot to go, as his crimes cover a 30 year history, but I'm think I'm heading in the right direction. --  +++$+++ Hi Sarah. A few weeks back you took an interest in the article on [[Peter Dupas]]. I've done a fair bit of work tonight and expanded on this monsters article. If you can stomach his life story, would you mind taking a quick glance and suggest where the article may be lacking if you have time? There's quite a lot to go, as his crimes cover a 30 year history, but I'm think I'm heading in the right direction. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 13:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
272881 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272880 +++$+++ 272880 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.159302060E09 +++$+++ Tread carefully around the crimelibrary.com library article on Dupas. I've found them highly unreliable compared to more reliable sources such as news reports - crimelibrary.com tends to have information on Dupas I can't find anywhere else, and dates there are often incorrect. I've just found a heap more on Dupas, so perhaps leave that quick review for a few days. This character has a lot to answer for and it's going to take a while to get it all into the article. For the code on my aussie flag usage, view the content of [[User:Longhair\/Header]]. Good to see your admin bit doing it's work also. I've been watching, and you're doing fine. --  +++$+++ :Tread carefully around the crimelibrary.com library article on Dupas. I've found them highly unreliable compared to more reliable sources such as news reports - crimelibrary.com tends to have information on Dupas I can't find anywhere else, and dates there are often incorrect. I've just found a heap more on Dupas, so perhaps leave that quick review for a few days. This character has a lot to answer for and it's going to take a while to get it all into the article. For the code on my aussie flag usage, view the content of [[User:Longhair/Header]]. Good to see your admin bit doing it's work also. I've been watching, and you're doing fine. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 13:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
272882 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272880 +++$+++ 272881 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.159302840E09 +++$+++ I wonder then, do you have access to legal documents pre-1997? [http:\/\/www.austlii.edu.au Austlii] doesn't hold them for Victorian Supreme Court and Court of Appeal cases. --  +++$+++ ::I wonder then, do you have access to legal documents pre-1997? [http://www.austlii.edu.au Austlii] doesn't hold them for Victorian Supreme Court and Court of Appeal cases. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 13:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
272883 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272880 +++$+++ 272882 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.159304160E09 +++$+++ That's it. I've had others give me older court documents before from Factiva. Thanks for the offer. I'll let you know about the keywords as I require the information. No use overloading :) --  +++$+++ :::That's it. I've had others give me older court documents before from Factiva. Thanks for the offer. I'll let you know about the keywords as I require the information. No use overloading :) -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] 13:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
272884 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272880 +++$+++ 272883 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.159386060E09 +++$+++ I spent a good part of today on this article. I managed to source some documents on Dupas from the 70's and have now added a great deal of information on his earlier life and other uncharged crimes on women. Problem is, when you spend so much time looking at the one subject, things tend to blur into one big mess :\/ Pick and pick away at my work if your time will allow. Another set of eyes is always a good thing. I think the article is about 85% complete for now. Dupas won't ever see the light of day again, so hopefully there won't be much more information to add apart from what I've already found and have here with me and his court appearances to come. Cheers. --  +++$+++ ::::I spent a good part of today on this article. I managed to source some documents on Dupas from the 70's and have now added a great deal of information on his earlier life and other uncharged crimes on women. Problem is, when you spend so much time looking at the one subject, things tend to blur into one big mess :/ Pick and pick away at my work if your time will allow. Another set of eyes is always a good thing. I think the article is about 85% complete for now. Dupas won't ever see the light of day again, so hopefully there won't be much more information to add apart from what I've already found and have here with me and his court appearances to come. Cheers. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 12:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
272885 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272880 +++$+++ 272884 +++$+++ 2006-09-28 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.159446300E09 +++$+++ Fair point on the edit to \"alleged\". Thanks for your time. I've thrown it up for Peer review to see what others have to suggest. Good question on the signature link to. It'd be an interesting article. --  +++$+++ :::::Fair point on the edit to "alleged". Thanks for your time. I've thrown it up for Peer review to see what others have to suggest. Good question on the signature link to. It'd be an interesting article. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 05:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

10737 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-02 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.230907560E09 +++$+++ Hi Dunks58, thank you for expanding [[Aberfan]]! I noticed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Aberfan&diff=261399471&oldid=260705062 your edit] shares similarities to http:\/\/www.milesago.com\/almanac\/1966.htm. Wikipedia can't accept large amounts of non-free text, is that website public domain and ok to use? I am a little worried about [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations|copyright violation]]. Regards, -- +++$+++ Hi Dunks58, thank you for expanding [[Aberfan]]! I noticed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aberfan&diff=261399471&oldid=260705062 your edit] shares similarities to http://www.milesago.com/almanac/1966.htm. Wikipedia can't accept large amounts of non-free text, is that website public domain and ok to use? I am a little worried about [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations|copyright violation]]. Regards, --[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] ([[User talk:Commander Keane|talk]]) 06:46, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
10738 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10737 +++$+++ 10737 +++$+++ 2009-01-05 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.231174980E09 +++$+++ Did you know you can use the \"Show preview\" button on the edit page to avoid multiple saves when editing an article? I mean this sincerely.-- +++$+++ :Did you know you can use the "Show preview" button on the edit page to avoid multiple saves when editing an article? I mean this sincerely.--[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] ([[User talk:Commander Keane|talk]]) 09:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

535028 +++$+++ AbsolutDan +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535028 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-21 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.148252280E09 +++$+++ The link to the open directory should also provide ample suggestion to the reader to look for free info. Cheers -- +++$+++ The link to the open directory should also provide ample suggestion to the reader to look for free info. Cheers --[[User:AbsolutDan|AbsolutDan]] [[User_talk:AbsolutDan|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 15:58, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
535029 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535028 +++$+++ 535028 +++$+++ 2006-05-21 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.148252400E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's great. I suppose I let myself follow the style of the previous paragraph. I am quite happy with your last edit. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Yes, that's great. I suppose I let myself follow the style of the previous paragraph. I am quite happy with your last edit. Cheers, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 16:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
535030 +++$+++ AbsolutDan +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535028 +++$+++ 535029 +++$+++ 2006-05-21 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.148252940E09 +++$+++ No worries, your intentions were good! And thanks. FYI, I just found that there's an article [[Mystery shopper]]. I'm suggesting a merge of the 2 -- +++$+++ ::No worries, your intentions were good! And thanks. FYI, I just found that there's an article [[Mystery shopper]]. I'm suggesting a merge of the 2 --[[User:AbsolutDan|AbsolutDan]] [[User_talk:AbsolutDan|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

113835 +++$+++ Noclador +++$+++ Hammersfan +++$+++ 113835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-30 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.209578820E09 +++$+++ Instead of reverting correct information go to the discussion of London district and discuss! -- +++$+++ Instead of reverting correct information go to the discussion of London district and discuss! --[[User:Noclador|noclador]] ([[User talk:Noclador|talk]]) 11:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
113836 +++$+++ Noclador +++$+++ Hammersfan +++$+++ 113835 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.209588840E09 +++$+++ more pressing questions: have a look at: [[commons:http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Military_OrBat_Graphics\/UK]] I spend 3 days trying to piece together a complete OrBat of the British Army - but the homepages is absolutely confusing (especially regarding Logistics and TA). As you seem to be the best informed Wikipedian in all things British Army could you have a look at the graphics and check if and which units might be wrongly assigned? also: what units make up 104 Logistic Brigade? who commands 16 Air Assault Brig: Joint Helicopter Command, 3 Division or 5 Division??? thanks for any info on the British Army structure. -- +++$+++ :* more pressing questions: have a look at: [[commons:http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Military_OrBat_Graphics/UK]] I spend 3 days trying to piece together a complete OrBat of the British Army - but the homepages is absolutely confusing (especially regarding Logistics and TA). As you seem to be the best informed Wikipedian in all things British Army could you have a look at the graphics and check if and which units might be wrongly assigned? also: what units make up 104 Logistic Brigade? who commands 16 Air Assault Brig: Joint Helicopter Command, 3 Division or 5 Division??? thanks for any info on the British Army structure. --[[User:Noclador|noclador]] ([[User talk:Noclador|talk]]) 13:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

535031 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-21 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.148277240E09 +++$+++ Well, I understand what you mean in the case of Kosovo article. That is also a reason why I did not worked more with that article (it is futile because most of the \"good faith\" edits are vandalized and are a subject to revert war). Things will change of course when the future statuses of Kosovo and Montenegro are solved and then we will have decent articles about Kosovo. Some people think that Wikipedia is a good place for political propaganda and once they had no political goal any more that they want to achieve with their edits, they will not do it. It is simple logic. :)  +++$+++ Well, I understand what you mean in the case of Kosovo article. That is also a reason why I did not worked more with that article (it is futile because most of the "good faith" edits are vandalized and are a subject to revert war). Things will change of course when the future statuses of Kosovo and Montenegro are solved and then we will have decent articles about Kosovo. Some people think that Wikipedia is a good place for political propaganda and once they had no political goal any more that they want to achieve with their edits, they will not do it. It is simple logic. :) [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 22:54, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
535032 +++$+++ PANONIAN +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535031 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-21 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.148279400E09 +++$+++ Best wishes for you too. I hope you will come back when the things become better.  +++$+++ ::Best wishes for you too. I hope you will come back when the things become better. [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 23:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

10744 +++$+++ Graham87 +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10744 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-30 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.246358640E09 +++$+++ I've name-dropped you at [[Talk:Normie Rowe#Copyright issues|this discussion]]. I remember our discussion a long, long time ago about the Masters Apprentices which is why I mentioned that article specifically. ''' +++$+++ I've name-dropped you at [[Talk:Normie Rowe#Copyright issues|this discussion]]. I remember our discussion a long, long time ago about the Masters Apprentices which is why I mentioned that article specifically. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 03:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
10745 +++$+++ Graham87 +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10744 +++$+++ 10744 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.246465920E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your message on the talk page. I hate to be a pain about the copyright permissions thing, but can you note the license of your work on the Milesago website? Wikipedia uses the [http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/ CC-by-SA 3.0 license] along with the [[WP:GFDL|GFDL]]. To be compatible with Wikipedia, your text needs to use the former license, which means that it can be used commercially and it must be redistributed under the same license. Here are some [http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/license\/results-one?license_code=by-sa&jurisdiction=-&version=3.0&lang=en guidelines for noting that a website is licensed under the CC-by-SA]. The copyright issue will probably come up repeatedly, and not everyone will remember that you're the owner of Milesago so text from there is OK in Wikipedia. If you have any further questions about licensing and permissions, I recommend that you get in touch with [[User:Pfctdayelise|Pfctdayelise]], a fellow Aussie Wikipedian. I'm confident about my message here, but I'm not familiar with the finer points of Wikipedia's licensing. ''' +++$+++ :Thanks for your message on the talk page. I hate to be a pain about the copyright permissions thing, but can you note the license of your work on the Milesago website? Wikipedia uses the [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ CC-by-SA 3.0 license] along with the [[WP:GFDL|GFDL]]. To be compatible with Wikipedia, your text needs to use the former license, which means that it can be used commercially and it must be redistributed under the same license. Here are some [http://creativecommons.org/license/results-one?license_code=by-sa&jurisdiction=-&version=3.0&lang=en guidelines for noting that a website is licensed under the CC-by-SA]. The copyright issue will probably come up repeatedly, and not everyone will remember that you're the owner of Milesago so text from there is OK in Wikipedia. If you have any further questions about licensing and permissions, I recommend that you get in touch with [[User:Pfctdayelise|Pfctdayelise]], a fellow Aussie Wikipedian. I'm confident about my message here, but I'm not familiar with the finer points of Wikipedia's licensing. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 09:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

535033 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535033 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-22 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.148287800E09 +++$+++ It ''might'' work, though normally maps are kept for geo-stubs (there isn't a WesternSahara-geo-stub yet). I'm a bit worried that it would spark more edit warring, though a map may be far better than the flag.  +++$+++ It ''might'' work, though normally maps are kept for geo-stubs (there isn't a WesternSahara-geo-stub yet). I'm a bit worried that it would spark more edit warring, though a map may be far better than the flag. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 01:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
535034 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535033 +++$+++ 535033 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.148549400E09 +++$+++ sounds like a reasonable idea. I've no objection to using the map as long as it doesn't start the in-fighting again. Feel free to suggest it on the talk page - we'll see how it goes from there.  +++$+++ :sounds like a reasonable idea. I've no objection to using the map as long as it doesn't start the in-fighting again. Feel free to suggest it on the talk page - we'll see how it goes from there. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 02:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

497913 +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ 497913 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-03 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.202068320E09 +++$+++ The lock on my door is although quite compromised. I am in control of this account and always have been.  Please resysop me.  +++$+++ The lock on my door is although quite compromised. I am in control of this account and always have been.  Please resysop me. [[User:RyanGerbil10|RyanGerbil10]]<small>[[User_talk:RyanGerbil10|(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!)]]</small> 11:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
497914 +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ 497913 +++$+++ 497913 +++$+++ 2008-02-03 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.202069700E09 +++$+++ If anything, I am a crime victim. This is a matter for the campus police, not a Wikimedia sysop.  +++$+++ :If anything, I am a crime victim. This is a matter for the campus police, not a Wikimedia sysop. [[User:RyanGerbil10|RyanGerbil10]]<small>[[User_talk:RyanGerbil10|(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!)]]</small> 12:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
497915 +++$+++ Bhadani +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ 497913 +++$+++ 497914 +++$+++ 2008-02-03 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.202083740E09 +++$+++ Probably you require [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Aligarh#Economics strong locks] -- +++$+++ ::Probably you require [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aligarh#Economics strong locks] --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] ([[User_talk:Bhadani|talk]]) 16:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
497916 +++$+++ Ferdiaob +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ 497913 +++$+++ 497915 +++$+++ 2008-02-03 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.202099340E09 +++$+++ Heh, hard luck dude, gotta hate those college dorms :). [[User:Ferdiaob\/My_Musings|&#9775;]] +++$+++ :::Heh, hard luck dude, gotta hate those college dorms :). [[User:Ferdiaob/My_Musings|&#9775;]][[User:Ferdiaob|Ferdia O'Brien]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Ferdiaob|(T)]]</sup></small>/<small><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ferdiaob|(C)]]</sub></small> 20:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
497917 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ 497913 +++$+++ 497916 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.202170800E09 +++$+++ Tell me about it. Just look at the thread above yours on BN. Good luck with preventing those intruders. Regards,  +++$+++ ::::Tell me about it. Just look at the thread above yours on BN. Good luck with preventing those intruders. Regards, [[User:Rudget|<span style="color:#171788;font-weight:bold">Rudget</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Rudget|.]] 16:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

272892 +++$+++ Legolost +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-27 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.159343820E09 +++$+++ Do ya think that Citizendium might cause people & users to leave wikipedia and join Citizendium. Oh yeah, and a long overdue congrats on your adminship! --  +++$+++ Do ya think that Citizendium might cause people & users to leave wikipedia and join Citizendium. Oh yeah, and a long overdue congrats on your adminship! -- [[User:Legolost|Lego@lost]] <sub>[[User Talk:Legolost|Rocks Collide! ]]</sub> | 00:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
272893 +++$+++ Legolost +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272892 +++$+++ 272892 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.159347600E09 +++$+++ Mmmmm... I don't really believe in the project, wikipedia is more well known to users (and vandals for that matter), and isn't there something like IP's can't edit Citizendium? I think the project will flounder eventually. --  +++$+++ :Mmmmm... I don't really believe in the project, wikipedia is more well known to users (and vandals for that matter), and isn't there something like IP's can't edit Citizendium? I think the project will flounder eventually. -- [[User:Legolost|Lego@lost]] <sub>[[User Talk:Legolost|Rocks Collide! ]]</sub> | 02:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

10749 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-07 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.257653400E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Brunel-shield.JPG]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Brunel-shield.JPG]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Brunel-shield.JPG]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:File:Brunel-shield.JPG]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Brunel-shield.JPG]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Brunel-shield.JPG]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 20:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
10750 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10749 +++$+++ 10749 +++$+++ 2009-11-07 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.257653640E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Enmore-Jungle.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Enmore-Jungle.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Enmore-Jungle.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Enmore-Jungle.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 20:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

10751 +++$+++ Hulmem +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-14 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.260787860E09 +++$+++ You added significant text to [[Sunshine pop]] but for the most part it was uncited.  I removed the uncited text.  Although you have made many edits to Wikipedia, I'd like to remind you of the Wikipedia [[WP:CITE|citation]] and [[WP:NOR|no original resaerch]] policies.  Also, you incorrectly marked the edit as \"minor\", so I would also like to remind you of the [[WP:MINOR|minor edit]] policy.  I am hoping you can find some citations from reliable sources and restore the gist of the text.  Thanks,  +++$+++ You added significant text to [[Sunshine pop]] but for the most part it was uncited.  I removed the uncited text.  Although you have made many edits to Wikipedia, I'd like to remind you of the Wikipedia [[WP:CITE|citation]] and [[WP:NOR|no original resaerch]] policies.  Also, you incorrectly marked the edit as "minor", so I would also like to remind you of the [[WP:MINOR|minor edit]] policy.  I am hoping you can find some citations from reliable sources and restore the gist of the text.  Thanks, [[User:Hulmem|hulmem]] ([[User talk:Hulmem|talk]]) 02:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
10752 +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10751 +++$+++ 10751 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.260862740E09 +++$+++ If I knew how to insert sound files, this is where I would put that groaning noise that Kif makes whenever Zapp Brannigan makes an annoying remark. I would have thought that the courteous thing to do would have been to insert a \"citation needed\" tag and alert me to the fact rather than simply deleting the text? Never mind - I will find the appropriate reference and restore the text as soon as I get a chance. I appreciate your interest and feedback. -  +++$+++ :If I knew how to insert sound files, this is where I would put that groaning noise that Kif makes whenever Zapp Brannigan makes an annoying remark. I would have thought that the courteous thing to do would have been to insert a "citation needed" tag and alert me to the fact rather than simply deleting the text? Never mind - I will find the appropriate reference and restore the text as soon as I get a chance. I appreciate your interest and feedback. - [[User:Dunks58|Dunks]] ([[User talk:Dunks58#top|talk]]) 23:39, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
10753 +++$+++ Hulmem +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10751 +++$+++ 10752 +++$+++ 2009-12-15 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.260879660E09 +++$+++ See [[WP:CMF]].  If I had the audio file, I would have put it here :)  First let me say please don't take my actions and remarks to mean that your contributions are not well done or not appreciated.  If you had only added one fact, I would have put the \"citation needed\" tag; but you added enough text that about five facts would have needed citations.  When you add text, it is really your responsibility to cite at the time you add the text; not just when someone notes the lack of citations or removes the text due to lack of citations.  If I had a dollar for every occurence of \"citation needed\" over a year old, I'd have a lot of dollars.  The text you added\/modified was well written but came across as original research.  If I interpret your reference to Kif's reaction correctly, you may think you are on expert on the topic (which you may very well be) and you get frustrated when idiots like me question your additions.  However, citing reliable sources is a key element of one of the five pillars of Wikipedia.  Perhaps you have made many edits in the past without citing sources.  I reverted this particular edit (out of the millions of edits adding uncited facts in Wikipedia) simply because Sunshine pop is one of the pages I watch and you added a significant set of (uncited) factual statements.  Nothing personal.  I sincerely hope you are able to find reliable sources to cite and I will try to take the time the look for some myself, as Sunshine pop is one of my favorite music genres.  Thanks again,  +++$+++ ::See [[WP:CMF]].  If I had the audio file, I would have put it here :)  First let me say please don't take my actions and remarks to mean that your contributions are not well done or not appreciated.  If you had only added one fact, I would have put the "citation needed" tag; but you added enough text that about five facts would have needed citations.  When you add text, it is really your responsibility to cite at the time you add the text; not just when someone notes the lack of citations or removes the text due to lack of citations.  If I had a dollar for every occurence of "citation needed" over a year old, I'd have a lot of dollars.  The text you added/modified was well written but came across as original research.  If I interpret your reference to Kif's reaction correctly, you may think you are on expert on the topic (which you may very well be) and you get frustrated when idiots like me question your additions.  However, citing reliable sources is a key element of one of the five pillars of Wikipedia.  Perhaps you have made many edits in the past without citing sources.  I reverted this particular edit (out of the millions of edits adding uncited facts in Wikipedia) simply because Sunshine pop is one of the pages I watch and you added a significant set of (uncited) factual statements.  Nothing personal.  I sincerely hope you are able to find reliable sources to cite and I will try to take the time the look for some myself, as Sunshine pop is one of my favorite music genres.  Thanks again, [[User:Hulmem|hulmem]] ([[User talk:Hulmem|talk]]) 04:21, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
10754 +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10751 +++$+++ 10753 +++$+++ 2009-12-15 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.260882000E09 +++$+++ No problem -- I just hadn't had a chance to get back to it to add the citations -- it was very late at night when I did it and I was bouncing back and forth from this and several other articles while I was editing the Warner Bros Records piece that I'm working on; it got late, I had to go to bed and I forgot to go back and add citations, sorry. I *would* appreciate getting some feedback on the Warner Bros article if you have a chance (it's getting a bit long I'm afraid), just please be aware that I'm still editing it, and for personal reasons I don't have long periods to spend on it -- I have to work in fits and start between several locations, so some stuff has been added from memory and I have to add citations later when I have access to the references. Not ideal, but the best I can manage at present, sorry. Anyway I do appreciate the feedback, thanks. All the best,  +++$+++ :::No problem -- I just hadn't had a chance to get back to it to add the citations -- it was very late at night when I did it and I was bouncing back and forth from this and several other articles while I was editing the Warner Bros Records piece that I'm working on; it got late, I had to go to bed and I forgot to go back and add citations, sorry. I *would* appreciate getting some feedback on the Warner Bros article if you have a chance (it's getting a bit long I'm afraid), just please be aware that I'm still editing it, and for personal reasons I don't have long periods to spend on it -- I have to work in fits and start between several locations, so some stuff has been added from memory and I have to add citations later when I have access to the references. Not ideal, but the best I can manage at present, sorry. Anyway I do appreciate the feedback, thanks. All the best, [[User:Dunks58|Dunks]] ([[User talk:Dunks58#top|talk]]) 05:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

535041 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535041 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-24 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.148524440E09 +++$+++ I imagine it was either a friend or sockpuppet of Pantherarosa.  It's amazing the backlash you can get from asking someone not to remove warnings.  +++$+++ I imagine it was either a friend or sockpuppet of Pantherarosa.  It's amazing the backlash you can get from asking someone not to remove warnings. [[User:Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]] 19:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
535042 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535041 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.148524500E09 +++$+++ It was coming from the Emirates, so it could be him\/her. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::It was coming from the Emirates, so it could be him/her. Cheers, [[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup> 19:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

272898 +++$+++ Junglecat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-30 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.159662660E09 +++$+++ Oh, BTW: I may send you an email on something I don\u2019t want to post here (you just have to love what some users do). Plus I have been busy reading up on VandalProof so it may be a while before I send it. Cheers!  +++$+++ Oh, BTW: I may send you an email on something I don’t want to post here (you just have to love what some users do). Plus I have been busy reading up on VandalProof so it may be a while before I send it. Cheers! [[User:Junglecat|<font color="green">JungleCat</font>]]  <small>[[User talk:Junglecat|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Junglecat|<font color="blue">contrib</font>]]</small> 17:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
272899 +++$+++ Junglecat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272898 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-02 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.159818900E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah. I sent you an email. Hoping all is well... -   +++$+++ :: Thanks Sarah. I sent you an email. Hoping all is well... -  [[User:Junglecat|<font color="green">JungleCat</font>]]  <small>[[User talk:Junglecat|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Junglecat|<font color="blue">contrib</font>]]</small> 12:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

535043 +++$+++ Dr.Gonzo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-24 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.148537400E09 +++$+++ Yeah, well, now you see what I had to deal with before, and actually on a vast number of Croatia related articles. Literaly dozens of throwaway sockpuppets, swarming like there's no tommorow? What can we do? Nothing it seems. It's one of the reasons why I'm starting to lose my faith in Wikipedia unfortunately :( -- +++$+++ Yeah, well, now you see what I had to deal with before, and actually on a vast number of Croatia related articles. Literaly dozens of throwaway sockpuppets, swarming like there's no tommorow? What can we do? Nothing it seems. It's one of the reasons why I'm starting to lose my faith in Wikipedia unfortunately :( --[[User:Dr.Gonzo|Dr.Gonzo]] 23:10, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
535044 +++$+++ Dr.Gonzo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535043 +++$+++ 535043 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.148537880E09 +++$+++ You're welcome to try but I expect nothing but petty bickering from this one. BTW, I did find ChrisO version at least a little to clinical, downplaying the huge Serbian role in the breakup, but I chose to shut up and support that version. But there's just no pleasing some people, is there? -- +++$+++ :You're welcome to try but I expect nothing but petty bickering from this one. BTW, I did find ChrisO version at least a little to clinical, downplaying the huge Serbian role in the breakup, but I chose to shut up and support that version. But there's just no pleasing some people, is there? --[[User:Dr.Gonzo|Dr.Gonzo]] 23:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
535045 +++$+++ Dr.Gonzo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535043 +++$+++ 535044 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.148539680E09 +++$+++ Well I had to interfere before the whole thing gets too entangled. I'm glad ChrisO is watching it at least. -- +++$+++ ::Well I had to interfere before the whole thing gets too entangled. I'm glad ChrisO is watching it at least. --[[User:Dr.Gonzo|Dr.Gonzo]] 23:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
535046 +++$+++ Dr.Gonzo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535043 +++$+++ 535045 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.148539980E09 +++$+++ Hey, I'm always level-headed, except when I'm pissed off. Then I'm even more level headed ;) -- +++$+++ :::Hey, I'm always level-headed, except when I'm pissed off. Then I'm even more level headed ;) --[[User:Dr.Gonzo|Dr.Gonzo]] 23:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
535047 +++$+++ Bormalagurski +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535043 +++$+++ 535046 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.148544600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the link, very interesting book :-) --[[Image:GrbSrbije.PNG|26px]]  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for the link, very interesting book :-) --[[Image:GrbSrbije.PNG|26px]] [[User:Bormalagurski|<font color="#003399">'''serbiana'''</font>]] [[Yugoslavia|'''-''']] [[User_talk:Bormalagurski|<font color="#A61022">'''talk'''</font>]] 01:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

272902 +++$+++ Bhadani +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-03 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.159936620E09 +++$+++ Oh. Sarah. I thought I was looking rather tired after 8 hours of journey. Thank you for your kind comments: ''Bhadani is distinguished and handsome looking'': [http:\/\/www.kiruba.com\/2006\/10\/evening-with-jimmy-wales-thanks-to.html]. -- +++$+++ Oh. Sarah. I thought I was looking rather tired after 8 hours of journey. Thank you for your kind comments: ''Bhadani is distinguished and handsome looking'': [http://www.kiruba.com/2006/10/evening-with-jimmy-wales-thanks-to.html]. --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] 21:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
272903 +++$+++ Bhadani +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272902 +++$+++ 272902 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.159946940E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, just saw you during RC Patrol. It is early morning in India: Good morning! -- +++$+++ :Hi Sarah, just saw you during RC Patrol. It is early morning in India: Good morning! --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] 00:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
272904 +++$+++ Bhadani +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272902 +++$+++ 272903 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.159947900E09 +++$+++ It is around 6.00 (morning) in India. In fact, Jimmy also felt the absence of women editors in the meet, and wished to see some women editors from India. I know (not personally though) of only one woman editor from India, [[User:Jishacj|Jishacj]]. In India, women are excelling in many fields, and school results show that girls, in many [[States and territories of India|states]], do better in school finals. I wish that more Indian women would start editing wikipedias. -- +++$+++ ::It is around 6.00 (morning) in India. In fact, Jimmy also felt the absence of women editors in the meet, and wished to see some women editors from India. I know (not personally though) of only one woman editor from India, [[User:Jishacj|Jishacj]]. In India, women are excelling in many fields, and school results show that girls, in many [[States and territories of India|states]], do better in school finals. I wish that more Indian women would start editing wikipedias. --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] 00:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

535048 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-25 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.148606760E09 +++$+++ Hey it's me again.  I noticed your userbox condemning all personal attacks.  Given our previous interactions, would you be able to direct me to an admin who deals with personal attacks.  WP:PAIN is in a major backlog, and I have a user who has now resorted to sockpuppets in order to attack me.  +++$+++ Hey it's me again.  I noticed your userbox condemning all personal attacks.  Given our previous interactions, would you be able to direct me to an admin who deals with personal attacks.  WP:PAIN is in a major backlog, and I have a user who has now resorted to sockpuppets in order to attack me. [[User:Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]] 18:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
535049 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535048 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.148607780E09 +++$+++ If this is quite urgent (I mean constant vandalism and personal attacks on your page), try the [[Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism]] noticeboard (there is always someone watching it). For direct response, try [[User:William_M._Connolley]], [[User:Dijxtra]] or even [[User:ChrisO]]. If this is a complex issue, involving sockpuppets, list it at [[Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser]] and leave a note explaining the case further on [[User Talk :Essjay]]. For more complex issues, try [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_investigation]] and write a short note (maybe better than jumping onto the CheckUser process directly, I would say). Hope this helps! [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::If this is quite urgent (I mean constant vandalism and personal attacks on your page), try the [[Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism]] noticeboard (there is always someone watching it). For direct response, try [[User:William_M._Connolley]], [[User:Dijxtra]] or even [[User:ChrisO]]. If this is a complex issue, involving sockpuppets, list it at [[Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser]] and leave a note explaining the case further on [[User Talk :Essjay]]. For more complex issues, try [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_investigation]] and write a short note (maybe better than jumping onto the CheckUser process directly, I would say). Hope this helps! [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 18:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

45484 +++$+++ Thegreatdr +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-06 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.231289520E09 +++$+++ I believe all the issues have been addressed now.  See what you think.   +++$+++ I believe all the issues have been addressed now.  See what you think.  [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] ([[User talk:Thegreatdr|talk]]) 16:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
45485 +++$+++ Thegreatdr +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45484 +++$+++ 45484 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.231484760E09 +++$+++ That's ok.  We all have different learning curves on here.  I've only thrown two articles up for reassessment.  Both failed because the GA criteria changed markedly in 2006, and there were few, if any, inline references in those articles.  Like most articles on here, Gulf Stream has been worked on by a number of people over the years.  Indeed, the first person who put it up for GA had no recollection of doing so, since it was two years ago.  I don't think there's such a thing as original editor on here.  It's probably best to check the article history, see who did the most extensive edits, then post a message on their talk page.  Then if they don't respond, put it up for GAR (or whatever they're abbreviating it as these days.)  I have 1800 articles on my watchlist, so I missed your comments on the Gulf Stream talk page.  Either way, the matter has been resolved, so whichever route you want to take is fine by wikipedia, other than deletion.  =)   +++$+++ :That's ok.  We all have different learning curves on here.  I've only thrown two articles up for reassessment.  Both failed because the GA criteria changed markedly in 2006, and there were few, if any, inline references in those articles.  Like most articles on here, Gulf Stream has been worked on by a number of people over the years.  Indeed, the first person who put it up for GA had no recollection of doing so, since it was two years ago.  I don't think there's such a thing as original editor on here.  It's probably best to check the article history, see who did the most extensive edits, then post a message on their talk page.  Then if they don't respond, put it up for GAR (or whatever they're abbreviating it as these days.)  I have 1800 articles on my watchlist, so I missed your comments on the Gulf Stream talk page.  Either way, the matter has been resolved, so whichever route you want to take is fine by wikipedia, other than deletion.  =)  [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] ([[User talk:Thegreatdr|talk]]) 23:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

613463 +++$+++ Aunt Entropy +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-25 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.230245100E09 +++$+++ BTW, do Scots say \"Happy Xmas\" like Brits? I wonder how the hell we ended up with \"Merry\"...  +++$+++ BTW, do Scots say "Happy Xmas" like Brits? I wonder how the hell we ended up with "Merry"... [[User:Aunt Entropy|Aunt Entropy]] ([[User talk:Aunt Entropy|talk]]) 14:45, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
613464 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613463 +++$+++ 613463 +++$+++ 2008-12-25 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.230246960E09 +++$+++ An interesting question. Of course many Scots are Brits too, though that's a bit of an old argument. Christmas wasn't really a Scottish custom for the last few centuries, as [[Church of Scotland|the Kirk]] frowned on such pagan festivities but seemed to be ok with [[Hogmanay]]. So the traditional season's greeting was on the lines of \"a guid new year tae ane and aw, and mony may ye see\", as the song puts it. However, since the 1950s the English custom of prezzies for the kids has expanded into us having a full-blown American style shopping experience, complete with Coca-Cola trademark Santas and the standard greeting \"A Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year\". Nobody says \"Happy Holidays\", not least because [[holiday]] has acquired the meaning of going away for what you might call a vacation. But I digress. Season's Greetings! . .  +++$+++ :An interesting question. Of course many Scots are Brits too, though that's a bit of an old argument. Christmas wasn't really a Scottish custom for the last few centuries, as [[Church of Scotland|the Kirk]] frowned on such pagan festivities but seemed to be ok with [[Hogmanay]]. So the traditional season's greeting was on the lines of "a guid new year tae ane and aw, and mony may ye see", as the song puts it. However, since the 1950s the English custom of prezzies for the kids has expanded into us having a full-blown American style shopping experience, complete with Coca-Cola trademark Santas and the standard greeting "A Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year". Nobody says "Happy Holidays", not least because [[holiday]] has acquired the meaning of going away for what you might call a vacation. But I digress. Season's Greetings! . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

10764 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-14 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.279167900E09 +++$+++ Hi Dunks58. A GA Review of the [[Dusty Springfield]] article for which you are a significant contributor has started and is on hold to allow improvements to be made. Please go to [[Talk:Dusty Springfield\/GA1]] to see fuller comments. Regards <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ Hi Dunks58. A GA Review of the [[Dusty Springfield]] article for which you are a significant contributor has started and is on hold to allow improvements to be made. Please go to [[Talk:Dusty Springfield/GA1]] to see fuller comments. Regards <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 21:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
10765 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10764 +++$+++ 10764 +++$+++ 2010-09-28 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.285706760E09 +++$+++ The [[Dusty Springfield]] article has not met GA criteria and has been failed. I really wanted to take this all the way to GA status, but it is taking too long, and I have to move on now. There are still sourcing issues to be dealt with, and coverage of Springfield's life and career needs more attention. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :The [[Dusty Springfield]] article has not met GA criteria and has been failed. I really wanted to take this all the way to GA status, but it is taking too long, and I have to move on now. There are still sourcing issues to be dealt with, and coverage of Springfield's life and career needs more attention. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 13:46, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

526082 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-21 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.153467960E09 +++$+++ Does this make sense to you?   +++$+++ Does this make sense to you?  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
526083 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526082 +++$+++ 526082 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.153470540E09 +++$+++ I check the site and found this which if applied to the National Guard would most likely have applied to an all volunteer unit: \"Withdraw federal recognition. To remove the designation of an Army National Guard unit from the official rolls of the United States Army. Federal recognition is withdrawn when the unit no longer meets Army requirements or is no longer needed in the force structure\"   +++$+++ * I check the site and found this which if applied to the National Guard would most likely have applied to an all volunteer unit: "Withdraw federal recognition. To remove the designation of an Army National Guard unit from the official rolls of the United States Army. Federal recognition is withdrawn when the unit no longer meets Army requirements or is no longer needed in the force structure"  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

535054 +++$+++ Stbalbach +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-27 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.148766960E09 +++$+++ Not sure if you followed the talk page discussions or edit history over the month of May but a single Anon user re-wrote most of the article to its current state which is, as you say, utter junk. In response another user has been slowly translating the Spanish Wikipedia version of this article, which is a Featured Article, and a few sections are in place. If you want to help with the translation any help would be appreciated. The anon user seems to have gone away for now, gave up in the face of resistence, but there are some other edits who think his material is \"better than nothing\" so its been hard to get rid of without something better. --  +++$+++ Not sure if you followed the talk page discussions or edit history over the month of May but a single Anon user re-wrote most of the article to its current state which is, as you say, utter junk. In response another user has been slowly translating the Spanish Wikipedia version of this article, which is a Featured Article, and a few sections are in place. If you want to help with the translation any help would be appreciated. The anon user seems to have gone away for now, gave up in the face of resistence, but there are some other edits who think his material is "better than nothing" so its been hard to get rid of without something better. -- [[User:Stbalbach|Stbalbach]] 14:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
535055 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535054 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-27 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.148767200E09 +++$+++ Yes, I could help. I will have a go at it tomorrow. Thanks, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::Yes, I could help. I will have a go at it tomorrow. Thanks, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 15:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

272912 +++$+++ I elliot +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-07 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.160263560E09 +++$+++ Sarah, why can't you block this vandal?  As evidence I offer his history of 'contributions'. +++$+++ Sarah, why can't you block this vandal?  As evidence I offer his history of 'contributions'.[[User:I elliot|I elliot]] 16:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
272913 +++$+++ I elliot +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272912 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-08 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.160329860E09 +++$+++ Hey Sarah, thanks for blocking him.  Kind Regards +++$+++ :: Hey Sarah, thanks for blocking him.  Kind Regards[[User:I elliot|I elliot]] 10:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

10769 +++$+++ Dan arndt +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-28 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.285677300E09 +++$+++ Am just going through a major revision on The Loved Ones article, which is particularly relevant given the recent announcement about their induction into the ARIA Hall of Fame. In doing some research there are a few questions I have relating to the [http:\/\/www.milesago.com\/Artists\/lovedones.htm  Milesago article on the band]. In that article it states that the first single from the band was \"Everlovin' Man\" on the Astor Record label in early 1966, however when I've checked the details of the Astor single (such as [http:\/\/www.milesago.com\/industry\/astor.htm Milesago] and a [http:\/\/www.globaldogproductions.info\/a\/astor-7000-series-oz.html 45 Discography for Astor Records]) they all come up with it being released in 1975. I have also checked a number of interviews with band members and they all seem to recall that the first recording sessions resulted in their debut single being \"[[The Loved One (song)|The Loved One]]\". Can you let me know where you came up with the information that \"Everlovin' Man\" was the first single as I would like to make sure the inforation on Wikipedia is as accurate as possible. Secondly in the Milesago article on the band it states that Anderson was a member of The Wild Cherries however the [http:\/\/www.milesago.com\/Artists\/wildcherries.htm Milesago article] on The Wild Cherries doesn't list Anderson as a member. Again the interviews with the band members seem to indicate that Terry Knott was the band's initial drummer but that he was replaced by Anderson before they made their first recordings, with Anderson 'found' by Ian Clyne. Was hoping you could help me out and clarify the band's history.  +++$+++ Am just going through a major revision on The Loved Ones article, which is particularly relevant given the recent announcement about their induction into the ARIA Hall of Fame. In doing some research there are a few questions I have relating to the [http://www.milesago.com/Artists/lovedones.htm  Milesago article on the band]. In that article it states that the first single from the band was "Everlovin' Man" on the Astor Record label in early 1966, however when I've checked the details of the Astor single (such as [http://www.milesago.com/industry/astor.htm Milesago] and a [http://www.globaldogproductions.info/a/astor-7000-series-oz.html 45 Discography for Astor Records]) they all come up with it being released in 1975. I have also checked a number of interviews with band members and they all seem to recall that the first recording sessions resulted in their debut single being "[[The Loved One (song)|The Loved One]]". Can you let me know where you came up with the information that "Everlovin' Man" was the first single as I would like to make sure the inforation on Wikipedia is as accurate as possible. Secondly in the Milesago article on the band it states that Anderson was a member of The Wild Cherries however the [http://www.milesago.com/Artists/wildcherries.htm Milesago article] on The Wild Cherries doesn't list Anderson as a member. Again the interviews with the band members seem to indicate that Terry Knott was the band's initial drummer but that he was replaced by Anderson before they made their first recordings, with Anderson 'found' by Ian Clyne. Was hoping you could help me out and clarify the band's history. [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 05:35, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
10770 +++$+++ Shaidar cuebiyar +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10769 +++$+++ 10769 +++$+++ 2010-09-29 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.285816080E09 +++$+++ Dunks, thanks for your work here. Could you have a quick check at the infobox photo caption: did I match up the names? I was using the colour photo from ''Magic Box''' front cover as a guide and may have mixed up the guys. +++$+++ :Dunks, thanks for your work here. Could you have a quick check at the infobox photo caption: did I match up the names? I was using the colour photo from ''Magic Box''' front cover as a guide and may have mixed up the guys.[[User:Shaidar cuebiyar|''shaidar cuebiyar'']] ([[User talk:Shaidar cuebiyar|talk]]) 20:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
10771 +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10769 +++$+++ 10769 +++$+++ 2010-09-30 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.285869660E09 +++$+++ - Yep, they look fine!  +++$+++ :- Yep, they look fine! [[User:Dunks58|Dunks]] ([[User talk:Dunks58#top|talk]]) 11:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
10772 +++$+++ Dan arndt +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10769 +++$+++ 10771 +++$+++ 2010-09-30 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.285841940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for providing the clarification in relation to the band's releases - just wanted to make sure everything was as accurate as possible.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for providing the clarification in relation to the band's releases - just wanted to make sure everything was as accurate as possible. [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 03:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
10773 +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10769 +++$+++ 10771 +++$+++ 2010-09-30 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.285869660E09 +++$+++ - My pleasure Dan - glad to be of service to such a great band.  +++$+++ ::- My pleasure Dan - glad to be of service to such a great band. [[User:Dunks58|Dunks]] ([[User talk:Dunks58#top|talk]]) 11:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

569774 +++$+++ Umalee +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.175844840E09 +++$+++ Hey. I don't really know how to phrase this question, but I'll do the best I can. I am a recent changes patrolee, and was wondering how a dynamic IP would show up in a service like ARIN. -- +++$+++ Hey. I don't really know how to phrase this question, but I'll do the best I can. I am a recent changes patrolee, and was wondering how a dynamic IP would show up in a service like ARIN. --[[User:Umalee|Umalee]] 00:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
569775 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569774 +++$+++ 569774 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.175882700E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I don't understand your question - ARIN?  Also, if your are a patrolee that means that you are subject to patrols - I think that you mean patroller, one who patrols the recent changs.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I don't understand your question - ARIN?  Also, if your are a patrolee that means that you are subject to patrols - I think that you mean patroller, one who patrols the recent changs. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 11:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

580317 +++$+++ Asarkof +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ 580317 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-24 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.222308240E09 +++$+++ I'm not saying that because the Stratasys article exists, the Z Corp article should, as you reference above.  I'm asking you how you can consider the Stratasys article non-promotional in tone.  It contains absolutely no third-party references, which is a requirement, and it is purely promotional, using superlatives to describe it's services\/products. Did you check it out? It has been recommended for deletion and should be.  The Z Corp page contained no promotional copy whatsoever, and contained several third-party, reputable references.  This is so frustrating. There's no feasible recourse for authors, and before authors have a chance to edit\/improve\/fix their articles, they're removed - in seconds.  There's a fundamental problems with this process. Please reply to my Talk page +++$+++ I'm not saying that because the Stratasys article exists, the Z Corp article should, as you reference above.  I'm asking you how you can consider the Stratasys article non-promotional in tone.  It contains absolutely no third-party references, which is a requirement, and it is purely promotional, using superlatives to describe it's services/products. Did you check it out? It has been recommended for deletion and should be.  The Z Corp page contained no promotional copy whatsoever, and contained several third-party, reputable references.  This is so frustrating. There's no feasible recourse for authors, and before authors have a chance to edit/improve/fix their articles, they're removed - in seconds.  There's a fundamental problems with this process. Please reply to my Talk page[[User:Asarkof|Asarkof]] ([[User talk:Asarkof|talk]]) 19:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
580318 +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ 580317 +++$+++ 580317 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.222309500E09 +++$+++ # AFD\/Articles For Deletion.  The big one.  Full deletion debates on a article by aritcle basis.  The most involved of the methods by far, but gets the most thourough results, usually. -  +++$+++ :# AFD/Articles For Deletion.  The big one.  Full deletion debates on a article by aritcle basis.  The most involved of the methods by far, but gets the most thourough results, usually. - [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] ([[User talk:TexasAndroid#top|talk]]) 19:25, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

272920 +++$+++ Mike1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-07 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.160245020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know about that. However, for some reason it won't work. - <strong> +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know about that. However, for some reason it won't work. - <strong>[[User:Mike1|<font color="#FF7518">Mike</font>]] ([[User talk:Mike1|<font color="#000000">Trick</font> <font color="#FF7518">or</font> <font color="#000000">treat</font>]])</strong> 11:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
272921 +++$+++ Mike1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272920 +++$+++ 272920 +++$+++ 2006-10-07 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.160245980E09 +++$+++ Here's how it looks in my monobook - kind of out of kilter for some unknown reason. [[User:Mike1\/monobook.js]]. I'll see if I can get a hold of the creator of the script, and thanks again! - <strong> +++$+++ :Here's how it looks in my monobook - kind of out of kilter for some unknown reason. [[User:Mike1/monobook.js]]. I'll see if I can get a hold of the creator of the script, and thanks again! - <strong>[[User:Mike1|<font color="#FF7518">Mike</font>]] ([[User talk:Mike1|<font color="#000000">Trick</font> <font color="#FF7518">or</font> <font color="#000000">treat</font>]])</strong> 11:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

10777 +++$+++ Hoary +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-23 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.287842820E09 +++$+++ Please reply either here or at [[Talk:Robert Whitaker (photographer)]]. Thanks. --  +++$+++ Please reply either here or at [[Talk:Robert Whitaker (photographer)]]. Thanks. -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary|talk]]) 07:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
10778 +++$+++ Hoary +++$+++ Dunks58 +++$+++ 10777 +++$+++ 10777 +++$+++ 2010-10-24 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.287926640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply. Well, we are now faced with various problems, including two major ones. First, though it's far more interesting than are any of \"my\" articles, this article of yours no more closely meets WP's normal requirements than do those that I was creating at the same time. Could you work a little on matching assertion to source? Secondly, what do you think would be a good title for the new article? --  +++$+++ :Thanks for the reply. Well, we are now faced with various problems, including two major ones. First, though it's far more interesting than are any of "my" articles, this article of yours no more closely meets WP's normal requirements than do those that I was creating at the same time. Could you work a little on matching assertion to source? Secondly, what do you think would be a good title for the new article? -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary|talk]]) 06:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

279688 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-02 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.162461660E09 +++$+++ Thank you for reverting the vandal on my page.  +++$+++ Thank you for reverting the vandal on my page. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 02:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
279689 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279688 +++$+++ 279688 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.162461780E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome.  +++$+++ :You're very welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

611043 +++$+++ Thparkth +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-02 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.275537960E09 +++$+++ Sorry it didn't work out for you this time. I do hope there's a next time so I can support you then. For what it's worth I think RfA is far too hard, far too much of a kangaroo court. Of course it's all those OTHER people that are the problem, not me ;)  +++$+++ Sorry it didn't work out for you this time. I do hope there's a next time so I can support you then. For what it's worth I think RfA is far too hard, far too much of a kangaroo court. Of course it's all those OTHER people that are the problem, not me ;) [[User:Thparkth|Thparkth]] ([[User talk:Thparkth|talk]]) 21:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
611044 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611043 +++$+++ 611043 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.275540060E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I think it was a real dramafest this time in more ways than one. I even waited to close it so that I could fill out your question as no one should be left hanging there. Oh well, there's always next year.  +++$+++ :Yeah, I think it was a real dramafest this time in more ways than one. I even waited to close it so that I could fill out your question as no one should be left hanging there. Oh well, there's always next year. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 21:41, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
611045 +++$+++ Fences and windows +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611043 +++$+++ 611044 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.275542760E09 +++$+++ Commiserations, but I didn't see it as a dramafest. I thought that keeping the RfA open for as long as you did was admirable, but shrugging your shoulders and carrying on as before will only result in a fifth RfA failing too. I was happy to let you have the mop as I thought overall you'd do OK and we always need more keen admins, but others weren't so happy for what seem like valid reasons, and they mostly gave a lot of constructive criticism rather than the abuse or ideological wrangling RfA often sees. Overall the advice seems to be to be less hasty and more considered in your actions in admin-like areas, and to take care to adhere to policy and procedure. Tedious, but necessary if the community is going to trust you with the tools. It's somewhat unfair as I could list several admins who ride roughshod over process and make questionable decisions on a regular basis, but hey.  +++$+++ ::Commiserations, but I didn't see it as a dramafest. I thought that keeping the RfA open for as long as you did was admirable, but shrugging your shoulders and carrying on as before will only result in a fifth RfA failing too. I was happy to let you have the mop as I thought overall you'd do OK and we always need more keen admins, but others weren't so happy for what seem like valid reasons, and they mostly gave a lot of constructive criticism rather than the abuse or ideological wrangling RfA often sees. Overall the advice seems to be to be less hasty and more considered in your actions in admin-like areas, and to take care to adhere to policy and procedure. Tedious, but necessary if the community is going to trust you with the tools. It's somewhat unfair as I could list several admins who ride roughshod over process and make questionable decisions on a regular basis, but hey. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:grey;">&amp;</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 22:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
611046 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611043 +++$+++ 611045 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.275543360E09 +++$+++ Well, it didn't go as well as we hoped but you did better than before, so you're heading in the right direction. This may help: [[User:Rlevse\/AC]]. Perhaps get an admin coach. I'd suggest working on the issues raised and wait at least 6 months. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Well, it didn't go as well as we hoped but you did better than before, so you're heading in the right direction. This may help: [[User:Rlevse/AC]]. Perhaps get an admin coach. I'd suggest working on the issues raised and wait at least 6 months. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 22:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
611047 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611043 +++$+++ 611045 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.275544020E09 +++$+++ Fences, actually I should've referred to the dramafest as the votes left by three users who basically faulted me for closing an AFD during the run. Did I learn something, yes, and I am more than willing to get coached again. I also plan on contacting those who brought up a unique point and working with them to see that those issues are resolved. I guess I should've paid more attention towards the issues that were brought up insteading of assuming good faith upon myself. Oh well, what's done is done and I will be better prepared next time.  +++$+++ :::Fences, actually I should've referred to the dramafest as the votes left by three users who basically faulted me for closing an AFD during the run. Did I learn something, yes, and I am more than willing to get coached again. I also plan on contacting those who brought up a unique point and working with them to see that those issues are resolved. I guess I should've paid more attention towards the issues that were brought up insteading of assuming good faith upon myself. Oh well, what's done is done and I will be better prepared next time. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 22:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
611048 +++$+++ Immunize +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611043 +++$+++ 611047 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.275545640E09 +++$+++ I feel you could make a good admin ''at some point'', and the main reason that I opposed was the copyright vios. I was particularly concerned about the fact that you continued after a single block, thus making more copyvios and were then reblocked. However, I might support at some later time. Best wishes.  +++$+++ ::::I feel you could make a good admin ''at some point'', and the main reason that I opposed was the copyright vios. I was particularly concerned about the fact that you continued after a single block, thus making more copyvios and were then reblocked. However, I might support at some later time. Best wishes. [[User:Immunize|Immunize ]] ([[User talk:Immunize|talk]]) 23:14, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
611049 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611043 +++$+++ 611048 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.275546000E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I figured as much. I was way younger and a lot less mature then so I understand where you are coming from and how it might concern you. At the time, I figured I would be able to skirt the rules and do what I wanted. After I got the second warning which threatened to indef me, I got scared and cleaned up my act. Thus began the path to where I am today.  +++$+++ :::::Yeah, I figured as much. I was way younger and a lot less mature then so I understand where you are coming from and how it might concern you. At the time, I figured I would be able to skirt the rules and do what I wanted. After I got the second warning which threatened to indef me, I got scared and cleaned up my act. Thus began the path to where I am today. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 23:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

272924 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-08 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.160296140E09 +++$+++ [[User:Baristarim]] continually attacks pages without reason, and along with his other pan Turk friends tries to push propaganda and POV on several articles. He is currently attack the Iranian's notice board page, claiming its a place where we recruit \"meat puppets\" where infact it is a place where we can post articles that are in urgent need of attention, such as the Ottoman Empire article where him and his friend claim that Persian and Arabic cultures had no affect, where infact, its exactly the opposite (see talk page). Please do something about this user. +++$+++ [[User:Baristarim]] continually attacks pages without reason, and along with his other pan Turk friends tries to push propaganda and POV on several articles. He is currently attack the Iranian's notice board page, claiming its a place where we recruit "meat puppets" where infact it is a place where we can post articles that are in urgent need of attention, such as the Ottoman Empire article where him and his friend claim that Persian and Arabic cultures had no affect, where infact, its exactly the opposite (see talk page). Please do something about this user.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 01:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
272925 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272924 +++$+++ 272924 +++$+++ 2006-10-08 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.160296860E09 +++$+++ Please tell that to the other User, he blatantly is ignoring Inshahee's warning. +++$+++ :Please tell that to the other User, he blatantly is ignoring Inshahee's warning.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 01:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
272926 +++$+++ Baristarim +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272924 +++$+++ 272925 +++$+++ 2006-10-08 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.160297280E09 +++$+++ Please dont fall into this trap.. I didn't ignore Inshanee's warning.. EVERY single time I make a change he uses the word ''pan-turkist'', this is really getting old.. You must understand how nerving it is to be called a vandal and pan-turkist and eg ''You continuously make baseless and ridiculous assertions without facts'', ''other pan Turkists that you muster up''.. Surely you must see that it is not easy to take it easy when even legitimate edits are reversed - an hour before this episode, i made this edit to calm a revert war in the [[Culture of the Ottoman Empire]] article, please have a look at yourself - this is the one he is referring to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Culture_of_the_Ottoman_Empire&diff=prev&oldid=80085092] and right after I was reverted like this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Culture_of_the_Ottoman_Empire&diff=next&oldid=80085333] !! How would you feel if that edit summary was directed at you? honestly? As for the Iranian's noticeboard, I took down inflammatory and unconstructive notices and simply added ''POV issues'' replacing ''Full of POV and propaganda'', ''under attack by pan-turkists'' that were practically calling on everyone to a turf war, he was also warned by other impartial users for the same reason sometime ago.. Regards..  +++$+++ ::Please dont fall into this trap.. I didn't ignore Inshanee's warning.. EVERY single time I make a change he uses the word ''pan-turkist'', this is really getting old.. You must understand how nerving it is to be called a vandal and pan-turkist and eg ''You continuously make baseless and ridiculous assertions without facts'', ''other pan Turkists that you muster up''.. Surely you must see that it is not easy to take it easy when even legitimate edits are reversed - an hour before this episode, i made this edit to calm a revert war in the [[Culture of the Ottoman Empire]] article, please have a look at yourself - this is the one he is referring to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Culture_of_the_Ottoman_Empire&diff=prev&oldid=80085092] and right after I was reverted like this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Culture_of_the_Ottoman_Empire&diff=next&oldid=80085333] !! How would you feel if that edit summary was directed at you? honestly? As for the Iranian's noticeboard, I took down inflammatory and unconstructive notices and simply added ''POV issues'' replacing ''Full of POV and propaganda'', ''under attack by pan-turkists'' that were practically calling on everyone to a turf war, he was also warned by other impartial users for the same reason sometime ago.. Regards.. [[User:Baristarim|Baristarim]] 01:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
272927 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272924 +++$+++ 272926 +++$+++ 2006-10-08 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.160298360E09 +++$+++ Are you kidding me? I was not even the first to call you a pan Turk. It was evident by your edits that you have some agenda. Its funny that you also dont debate with sources, just your POV. You were proven wrong on several occasions yet you still refuse to understand that things are based on facts, not POV. You go as far as saying that the University of Texas is not a reliable source. And the Culture of the Ottoman empire is as the title says, '''about the culture''', yet you want to take out all references to Arabic and Iranian culture, which made up the culture of the Ottoman Empire. +++$+++ :::Are you kidding me? I was not even the first to call you a pan Turk. It was evident by your edits that you have some agenda. Its funny that you also dont debate with sources, just your POV. You were proven wrong on several occasions yet you still refuse to understand that things are based on facts, not POV. You go as far as saying that the University of Texas is not a reliable source. And the Culture of the Ottoman empire is as the title says, '''about the culture''', yet you want to take out all references to Arabic and Iranian culture, which made up the culture of the Ottoman Empire.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 02:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

535069 +++$+++ Burgas00 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-01 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.149219840E09 +++$+++ Ok you are right. But we should not fall for the same tendentious editing which is so characteristic of Gibnews and Gibraltarian.-- +++$+++ Ok you are right. But we should not fall for the same tendentious editing which is so characteristic of Gibnews and Gibraltarian.--[[User:Burgas00|Burgas00]] 20:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
535070 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535069 +++$+++ 535069 +++$+++ 2006-06-01 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.149220680E09 +++$+++ Yes, I know. That is why Gibnews keep dropping pills about how untrustworthy Spanish people are. He is simply trying to provoke me in that sense but it is not going to happen. I have made some mistakes in the past but after 3000 edits you learn the lesson well. I have no patience with people who think they [[WP:OWN|own]] articles and generally get tired about relatively soon (I would rather use my time somewhere else). Also, please make no mistake I have no problem with people from Gibraltar at all, one of my flatmates while I was at university in England was a Gibraltarian and I really used to enjoy the fact of being able to code-switch with him in front of everyone else as if it was the most natural thing in the world. I have problems with the attitude of other users such as Ismael76, this  is why I have ignored his comments somewhere else. Salud y saludos, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Yes, I know. That is why Gibnews keep dropping pills about how untrustworthy Spanish people are. He is simply trying to provoke me in that sense but it is not going to happen. I have made some mistakes in the past but after 3000 edits you learn the lesson well. I have no patience with people who think they [[WP:OWN|own]] articles and generally get tired about relatively soon (I would rather use my time somewhere else). Also, please make no mistake I have no problem with people from Gibraltar at all, one of my flatmates while I was at university in England was a Gibraltarian and I really used to enjoy the fact of being able to code-switch with him in front of everyone else as if it was the most natural thing in the world. I have problems with the attitude of other users such as Ismael76, this  is why I have ignored his comments somewhere else. Salud y saludos, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 20:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

454269 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-10 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.228900860E09 +++$+++ When deleting (before restoring) this, you should really have noticed that it was originally a redirect to [[medal]], which should have been left. Hatnote now added.  +++$+++ When deleting (before restoring) this, you should really have noticed that it was originally a redirect to [[medal]], which should have been left. Hatnote now added. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 01:21, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
454270 +++$+++ fvw +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454269 +++$+++ 454269 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.229238240E09 +++$+++ Good point, must have been distracted by the is-it-or-isn't-it notability issues. I'll try to be more careful in future. -- +++$+++ :Good point, must have been distracted by the is-it-or-isn't-it notability issues. I'll try to be more careful in future. --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 23:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
454271 +++$+++ fvw +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454269 +++$+++ 454269 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.229238360E09 +++$+++ [[WP:BALL|Wikipedia is not a crystal ball]]. But if you want to dispute some speedy deletion, please give me an exact article name or the account you created it under, as I can't find anything under the deleted contributions of your IP. -- +++$+++ :[[WP:BALL|Wikipedia is not a crystal ball]]. But if you want to dispute some speedy deletion, please give me an exact article name or the account you created it under, as I can't find anything under the deleted contributions of your IP. --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 23:06, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

272929 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-09 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.160385240E09 +++$+++ Regardless of whether or not the Bindi Irwin domain name is now owned by the Irwins', I've blocked the anon anyway as a resurfacing of [[Wikipedia:Long term abuse\/Universe Daily]]. He can address all the outstanding issues there if he wishes to contribute. Thanks for reverting. --  +++$+++ Regardless of whether or not the Bindi Irwin domain name is now owned by the Irwins', I've blocked the anon anyway as a resurfacing of [[Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Universe Daily]]. He can address all the outstanding issues there if he wishes to contribute. Thanks for reverting. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 02:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
272930 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272929 +++$+++ 272929 +++$+++ 2006-10-09 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.160386380E09 +++$+++ No problems. You know, you wouldn't believe how many times I'm referred to as a \"she\", the most recent occuring just yesterday. People make crazy assumptions - and I don't even have long hair :) --  +++$+++ :No problems. You know, you wouldn't believe how many times I'm referred to as a "she", the most recent occuring just yesterday. People make crazy assumptions - and I don't even have long hair :) -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 02:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

10787 +++$+++ DMG413 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-06-16 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.087433520E09 +++$+++ I think the way to create the subcategories is to enter an article in the subcategory first and then edit the subcategory page to put in the broader category. (I'm only about 90% certain that this is correct, though). I don't know who created the banks category in the first place, but I put most of the articles in there now in there. -- +++$+++ I think the way to create the subcategories is to enter an article in the subcategory first and then edit the subcategory page to put in the broader category. (I'm only about 90% certain that this is correct, though). I don't know who created the banks category in the first place, but I put most of the articles in there now in there. --[[User:DMG413|DMG413]] 17:52, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
10788 +++$+++  +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10787 +++$+++ 10787 +++$+++ 2004-06-20 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.087779720E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, I know very little myself. I reccomend you keep looking about, or trying your own ideas. [[Be bold!]] :)  +++$+++ :I'm sorry, I know very little myself. I reccomend you keep looking about, or trying your own ideas. [[Be bold!]] :) [[User:Sam Spade|Sam]] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Sam_Spade&action=edit&section=new '''Spade''']] 18:02, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

272932 +++$+++ Adam Carr +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-09 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.160391960E09 +++$+++ On reading the post, it is clearly the same person. He is now registered but refuses to sign his posts.  +++$+++ On reading the post, it is clearly the same person. He is now registered but refuses to sign his posts. [[User:Adam Carr|Adam]] 04:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
272933 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272932 +++$+++ 272932 +++$+++ 2006-10-09 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.160392920E09 +++$+++ Ok thanks for letting me know. Totally different ip range from another ISP. The words \"''filthy animal''\" and the making of legal threats haven't formed part of our anon's vocabulary or ammunition store as yet. You must have attracted your own personal breed of annoyances ;) Good luck. --  +++$+++ :Ok thanks for letting me know. Totally different ip range from another ISP. The words "''filthy animal''" and the making of legal threats haven't formed part of our anon's vocabulary or ammunition store as yet. You must have attracted your own personal breed of annoyances ;) Good luck. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 04:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

10790 +++$+++ Folajimi +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-01 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.146537120E09 +++$+++ You are invited to participate in the discussion on the deletion; feel free to contact me for more information on this matter. Cheers.  +++$+++ You are invited to participate in the discussion on the deletion; feel free to contact me for more information on this matter. Cheers. [[User:Folajimi|Folajimi]] 19:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
10791 +++$+++ Folajimi +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10790 +++$+++ 10790 +++$+++ 2006-05-02 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.146629820E09 +++$+++ The issue of notability is a non-trivial one; someone has already come to your defense on the matter at the [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Jetha_Lila|AfD discussion page]] for the entry. If you are able to make a convincing (and credible0 case for preserving the article in the encyclopaedia, now is the time to do it, and the discussion page would be the most appropriate venue.  +++$+++ :The issue of notability is a non-trivial one; someone has already come to your defense on the matter at the [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jetha_Lila|AfD discussion page]] for the entry. If you are able to make a convincing (and credible0 case for preserving the article in the encyclopaedia, now is the time to do it, and the discussion page would be the most appropriate venue. [[User:Folajimi|Folajimi]] 21:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

535080 +++$+++ Ricardo Lagos +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535080 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-03 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.149320820E09 +++$+++ What personal attack specifically are you referring to? The \"moron\" comment has been resolved.  +++$+++ What personal attack specifically are you referring to? The "moron" comment has been resolved. [[User:Ricardo Lagos|Ricardo Lagos]] 00:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
535081 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535080 +++$+++ 535080 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.149320880E09 +++$+++ Solved? You still called him \"intelectually impaired\"![[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Solved? You still called him "intelectually impaired"![[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 00:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
535082 +++$+++ Ricardo Lagos +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535080 +++$+++ 535081 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.149321900E09 +++$+++ Ah, but you see, he had written Richard Lagos instead of Ricardo Lagos. The \"intelectually impaired\" comment was not a personal attack, but a fact. Best regards,  +++$+++ :: Ah, but you see, he had written Richard Lagos instead of Ricardo Lagos. The "intelectually impaired" comment was not a personal attack, but a fact. Best regards, [[User:Ricardo Lagos|Ricardo Lagos]] 01:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
535083 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535080 +++$+++ 535082 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.149322080E09 +++$+++ I still think you ought to apologise to him. I understand that you are a relatively new user and everybody makes mistakes. I wish you learn from errors and become a good member of the wikipedia community. Regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::I still think you ought to apologise to him. I understand that you are a relatively new user and everybody makes mistakes. I wish you learn from errors and become a good member of the wikipedia community. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 01:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

272937 +++$+++ DVD R W +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272937 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-09 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.160401140E09 +++$+++ That one made so many accounts before, and after checkuser the IP was blocked for a month and lots of unblocked accounts were discovered. The IP block has probably expired, I reposted at Checkuser to have it renewed. We'll see, thanks again,  +++$+++ That one made so many accounts before, and after checkuser the IP was blocked for a month and lots of unblocked accounts were discovered. The IP block has probably expired, I reposted at Checkuser to have it renewed. We'll see, thanks again, [[User:DVD R W| DVD]]+[[User_talk:DVD R W| R/W]] 06:39, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
272938 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272937 +++$+++ 272937 +++$+++ 2006-10-09 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.160401440E09 +++$+++ As usual, you get in there just before me! I'll be travelling the next wee while. Take care, -- +++$+++ :As usual, you get in there just before me! I'll be travelling the next wee while. Take care, --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 06:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

585205 +++$+++ gadfium +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-18 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.205892420E09 +++$+++ I see you indef semi-protected [[New Zealand]] due to vandalism about a week ago. I've started a discussion about the semi-protection at [[Talk:New Zealand#Semi-protection]], and you're welcome to give your views there.-<font face=\"cursive\" color=\"#808080\"> +++$+++ I see you indef semi-protected [[New Zealand]] due to vandalism about a week ago. I've started a discussion about the semi-protection at [[Talk:New Zealand#Semi-protection]], and you're welcome to give your views there.-<font face="cursive" color="#808080">[[User talk:gadfium|gadfium]]</font> 19:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
585206 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585205 +++$+++ 585205 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.205892660E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ :Done. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

535084 +++$+++ Ilir pz +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-03 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.149357420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reporting.  +++$+++ Thanks for reporting. [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 10:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
535085 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535084 +++$+++ 535084 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.149357720E09 +++$+++ Simply self-revert and problem solved ;-)[[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Simply self-revert and problem solved ;-)[[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 11:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

10797 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-21 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.182457860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] 13:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
10798 +++$+++  CattleGirl +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10797 +++$+++ 10797 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.182489480E09 +++$+++ If you see them vandalising again, just list them on [[WP:AIV]]- the request will be noticed quickly. Cheers- ''' +++$+++ :If you see them vandalising again, just list them on [[WP:AIV]]- the request will be noticed quickly. Cheers- '''[[User:CattleGirl|<font color="blue">Cat</font><font color="darkblue">tleG</font><font color="black">irl</font>]]''' <sup>''[[User talk: CattleGirl| talk]]''</sup> 22:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

10799 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10799 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-03 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.183505100E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] 16:25, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
10800 +++$+++  CattleGirl +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10799 +++$+++ 10799 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 09:16:00 +++$+++ 1.183565760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for looking out for it, btw, we can never have enough users on vandalism patrol! Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Thanks for looking out for it, btw, we can never have enough users on vandalism patrol! Cheers, '''[[User:CattleGirl|<font color="blue">Cat</font><font color="darkblue">tleG</font><font color="black">irl</font>]]''' <sup>''[[User talk: CattleGirl| talk]]''</sup> 09:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

10802 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10802 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-06 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.189108080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] 12:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
10803 +++$+++  CattleGirl +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10802 +++$+++ 10802 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.189182000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know- ''' +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know- '''[[User:CattleGirl|<font color="blue">Cat</font><font color="darkblue">tleG</font><font color="black">irl</font>]]''' <sup>''[[User talk: CattleGirl| talk]]''</sup> 09:20, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

482398 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.171668240E09 +++$+++ Looks like someone was looking over my shoulder. You may wield your trusty electronic sword, Sir Knight. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj]  +++$+++ Looks like someone was looking over my shoulder. You may wield your trusty electronic sword, Sir Knight. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj] [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 15:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
482399 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482398 +++$+++ 482398 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.171686900E09 +++$+++ Hey congratulations!  Of course it doesn't count as much if it's just your talk page.  ;)  \u2014 +++$+++ :Hey congratulations!  Of course it doesn't count as much if it's just your talk page.  ;)  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 20:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

10807 +++$+++ Jauerback +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-10 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.205141100E09 +++$+++ No problem.  Good luck with the discussion to get the edit warring resolved. <b> +++$+++ No problem.  Good luck with the discussion to get the edit warring resolved. <b>[[User:Jauerback|Jauerback]]</b><sup>[[User talk:Jauerback|dude?]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jauerback|dude.]]</sub> 02:25, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
10808 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10807 +++$+++ 10807 +++$+++ 2008-03-10 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.205167980E09 +++$+++ Just my 2c, my own preferred compromise, based on experience at the [[WP:MOSMAC]] discussion, is \"former Yugoslav [[Republic of Macedonia]]\", on articles focussing on Greek topics. \"RoM\" is the proper name and the article location, so that alone gets the wikilink, \"former Yugoslav\" can arguably pass as a disambiguating qualifier (although I'm not really convinced that's necessary, there's a strong feeling among Greek editors that they don't like plain \"RoM\"). This is only by way of exception, for Greece-related articles; everywhere else simply RoM is preferred. Abbreviated \"FYROM\" should basically never be used.  +++$+++ :Just my 2c, my own preferred compromise, based on experience at the [[WP:MOSMAC]] discussion, is "former Yugoslav [[Republic of Macedonia]]", on articles focussing on Greek topics. "RoM" is the proper name and the article location, so that alone gets the wikilink, "former Yugoslav" can arguably pass as a disambiguating qualifier (although I'm not really convinced that's necessary, there's a strong feeling among Greek editors that they don't like plain "RoM"). This is only by way of exception, for Greece-related articles; everywhere else simply RoM is preferred. Abbreviated "FYROM" should basically never be used. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 09:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
10809 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10807 +++$+++ 10808 +++$+++ 2008-03-10 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.205183100E09 +++$+++ [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]]: Although I prefer the ROP\/FYROM formulation on aesthetic grounds, I can live with your suggestion. The problem will be getting others to go along. There appear to be a number of people, or 1+sock puppets, committed to FYROM.  +++$+++ ::[[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]]: Although I prefer the ROP/FYROM formulation on aesthetic grounds, I can live with your suggestion. The problem will be getting others to go along. There appear to be a number of people, or 1+sock puppets, committed to FYROM. [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 14:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

535096 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535096 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-05 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.149509400E09 +++$+++ Hi again, I was wondering if you could voice your opinion in another personal attack case here: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Personal_attacks_by_user_Batman2005_and_bad-faith_edits_by_Moe_Epsilon] basically Batman2005 is linking things like douche and loser to people he doesn't like.  +++$+++ Hi again, I was wondering if you could voice your opinion in another personal attack case here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Personal_attacks_by_user_Batman2005_and_bad-faith_edits_by_Moe_Epsilon] basically Batman2005 is linking things like douche and loser to people he doesn't like. [[User:Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]] 05:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
535097 +++$+++ Moe Epsilon +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535096 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.149509700E09 +++$+++ Note that these people are not Wikipedia editors and it doesn't violate NPA.  +++$+++ ::Note that these people are not Wikipedia editors and it doesn't violate NPA. [[User:Moe Epsilon|<font color="CD2626">The King</font>]] [[User talk:Moe Epsilon|<font color="CD2626">of Kings</font>]] 05:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
535098 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535096 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.149509820E09 +++$+++ Also note that this is what Moe Epsilon's thinks the policy implies.  I'm sure Asterion has read the first line that says do not make personal attacks anywhere.  And Moe, the only way you would know that I posted on Asterion's talk page is if you were tracking my contribs.  Are you wikistalking me? :D *blushes*  +++$+++ :::Also note that this is what Moe Epsilon's thinks the policy implies.  I'm sure Asterion has read the first line that says do not make personal attacks anywhere.  And Moe, the only way you would know that I posted on Asterion's talk page is if you were tracking my contribs.  Are you wikistalking me? :D *blushes* [[User:Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]] 05:17, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
535099 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535096 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.149571140E09 +++$+++ Regarding Batman2005, I believe indeed that some of his comments could be understood as personal attacks, particularly [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Miniskirts&diff=56754942&oldid=56752490 this one] (even if it was directed to an obvious sockpuppet who had vandalised Batman2005's userpage). On the userpage matter, I am personally against anything divisive or what could be understood as offensive by any member of wikipedia or from elsewhere. The way I see it is that at the end of the day, we are all working here towards writing an encyclopedia and this sort of things do not help much. This is not a political forum. The problem is that policy in this area is still very unclear, as it is in the userbox issue, and many users would object to any sort of official control. Nevertheless, I suspect Batman2005 was trying to make a point on being controversial and has also shown a certain disrespect for wikipedia policies (i.e. \"I got blocked once, for a [[No_personal_attacks|bullshit reason]]\"). I am sorry if my opinion is not very clear. Regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::::Regarding Batman2005, I believe indeed that some of his comments could be understood as personal attacks, particularly [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Miniskirts&diff=56754942&oldid=56752490 this one] (even if it was directed to an obvious sockpuppet who had vandalised Batman2005's userpage). On the userpage matter, I am personally against anything divisive or what could be understood as offensive by any member of wikipedia or from elsewhere. The way I see it is that at the end of the day, we are all working here towards writing an encyclopedia and this sort of things do not help much. This is not a political forum. The problem is that policy in this area is still very unclear, as it is in the userbox issue, and many users would object to any sort of official control. Nevertheless, I suspect Batman2005 was trying to make a point on being controversial and has also shown a certain disrespect for wikipedia policies (i.e. "I got blocked once, for a [[No_personal_attacks|bullshit reason]]"). I am sorry if my opinion is not very clear. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 22:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

569780 +++$+++ TeckWiz +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569780 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-07 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.175930220E09 +++$+++ Why was KentuckyHomosexual blocked? I'm usually for blocking usernames against policy, but this seems to me like someone describing there state and orientation. Also, autoblock wasn't disabled. -- +++$+++ Why was KentuckyHomosexual blocked? I'm usually for blocking usernames against policy, but this seems to me like someone describing there state and orientation. Also, autoblock wasn't disabled. --[[User:TeckWiz|'''TeckWiz''']] <sup>[[User_talk:TeckWiz|Parlate]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/TeckWiz|Contribs]]<sub>[[Special:Emailuser/TeckWiz|@]]</sub>(Lets go Yankees!)</small> 00:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
569781 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569780 +++$+++ 569780 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.175931420E09 +++$+++ The username is a synonym of [[:User talk:Kentuckyfag|Kentuckyfag]], a derogatory word for homosexual, at least in America. The request was made at AIV on the basis that the creator of these accounts was not conforming to username policy.  On your last point, I will double-check the autoblock and redo it if necessary.  I thought that I had covered it.  Regards,  +++$+++ :The username is a synonym of [[:User talk:Kentuckyfag|Kentuckyfag]], a derogatory word for homosexual, at least in America. The request was made at AIV on the basis that the creator of these accounts was not conforming to username policy.  On your last point, I will double-check the autoblock and redo it if necessary.  I thought that I had covered it.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 00:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
569782 +++$+++ Random832 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569780 +++$+++ 569781 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.175945220E09 +++$+++ If the reason the username is against policy is that it's derogatory, further usernames shouldn't be blocked for being \"synonyms\" unless the synonyms are also derogatory, should they? -- +++$+++ ::If the reason the username is against policy is that it's derogatory, further usernames shouldn't be blocked for being "synonyms" unless the synonyms are also derogatory, should they? --[[User Talk:Random832|Random832]] 04:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

10810 +++$+++ Reuv +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10810 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-18 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.221790680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Reuv|Reuv]] ([[User talk:Reuv|talk]]) 19:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
10811 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10810 +++$+++ 10810 +++$+++ 2009-01-14 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.231940220E09 +++$+++ Probably true, but there's still some more that can be said on some of them. This one, for instance, doesn't indicate where in Zanzibar it was based, or say who its Governor was, what sort of banking it was involved with, whether it had branches, and if so whether they were all in Zanzibar, whether it simply closed down or closed because of high debts, other important events in its history, etc etc etc... It may be destined to be stubby, but it can still be bigger than it currently is, surely.   +++$+++ :Probably true, but there's still some more that can be said on some of them. This one, for instance, doesn't indicate where in Zanzibar it was based, or say who its Governor was, what sort of banking it was involved with, whether it had branches, and if so whether they were all in Zanzibar, whether it simply closed down or closed because of high debts, other important events in its history, etc etc etc... It may be destined to be stubby, but it can still be bigger than it currently is, surely.  [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 05:37, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

10812 +++$+++ Adam.J.W.C. +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10812 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-21 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.232560260E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just got back from the above mentioned battery. I managed to find my way in as well. I will be uploading some photos soon. I even managed to get into the underground bunker there as well. I will show you the photos as I upload them [[:File:Signal hill battery gun emplacement inside.jpg|Inside the gun emplacement]]. Cheers  +++$+++ Hi, I just got back from the above mentioned battery. I managed to find my way in as well. I will be uploading some photos soon. I even managed to get into the underground bunker there as well. I will show you the photos as I upload them [[:File:Signal hill battery gun emplacement inside.jpg|Inside the gun emplacement]]. Cheers [[User:Adam.J.W.C.|.         Adam]] ([[User talk:Adam.J.W.C.|talk]]) 09:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
10813 +++$+++ Adam.J.W.C. +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10812 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-24 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.232800440E09 +++$+++ I do have pictures outside the fortification but because it was getting dark some of the photos came out over or under exposed. I might be able to put a HDR together. I might return to the sight soon to take some exterior shots but I don't want to go back inside that bunker. You don't know how creepy it was down there, and hot as well. There arey two or three bunkers within that vicinity. The last couple of times I went to look at the fort the doors were welded shut so on this occasion when I went out there I was only expecting to take photos of the exterior only, but to my surprise the door was open. At first it seems as though there is only one level and I almost left without find the underground bunker. If you do visit the site look out for the tiny hatch with the ladder going below ground level. Also check out the coords I added, you can see the fort in street view. I will upload more pics later on. Cheers +++$+++ ::I do have pictures outside the fortification but because it was getting dark some of the photos came out over or under exposed. I might be able to put a HDR together. I might return to the sight soon to take some exterior shots but I don't want to go back inside that bunker. You don't know how creepy it was down there, and hot as well. There arey two or three bunkers within that vicinity. The last couple of times I went to look at the fort the doors were welded shut so on this occasion when I went out there I was only expecting to take photos of the exterior only, but to my surprise the door was open. At first it seems as though there is only one level and I almost left without find the underground bunker. If you do visit the site look out for the tiny hatch with the ladder going below ground level. Also check out the coords I added, you can see the fort in street view. I will upload more pics later on. Cheers[[User:Adam.J.W.C.|.         Adam]] ([[User talk:Adam.J.W.C.|talk]]) 04:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

272959 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-21 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.161468120E09 +++$+++ It has just come to my knowledge that GM has been purposely manipulation Brittanica quotes for his own means. Brittanica never says what GM has been claiming it says and using as evidence. I have read the actual text. This is disruptive behaviour, he has purposely been manipulating Brittanica and distorting what it says; this would be classified under historical revisionism and propaganda, but I will leave the decision up to you, since you are an admin, as to what step I should take next regarding GM's behaviour. +++$+++ It has just come to my knowledge that GM has been purposely manipulation Brittanica quotes for his own means. Brittanica never says what GM has been claiming it says and using as evidence. I have read the actual text. This is disruptive behaviour, he has purposely been manipulating Brittanica and distorting what it says; this would be classified under historical revisionism and propaganda, but I will leave the decision up to you, since you are an admin, as to what step I should take next regarding GM's behaviour.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 15:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
272960 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272959 +++$+++ 272959 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.161470880E09 +++$+++ Ok sure. I only have access to the regular online version, and from what I read there, Brittanica says nothing that GM claims it says. Thanks for the help. +++$+++ :Ok sure. I only have access to the regular online version, and from what I read there, Brittanica says nothing that GM claims it says. Thanks for the help.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 15:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
272961 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272959 +++$+++ 272960 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.161474900E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome and I'm the one that should be thanking you. Without your help I probably would have made the same mistakes as before. +++$+++ ::You are very welcome and I'm the one that should be thanking you. Without your help I probably would have made the same mistakes as before.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 16:55, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
272962 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272959 +++$+++ 272961 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.161478440E09 +++$+++ Just tell me when we should start talking about the two article and I will write up my comments. +++$+++ :::Just tell me when we should start talking about the two article and I will write up my comments.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 17:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
272963 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272959 +++$+++ 272962 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.161479520E09 +++$+++ Sure, thats fine with me. Also, are we allowed to comment on the comments section? Because you mentioned something about having other secondary sources, I just want to say that that is exactly what I have done. I have even researched medieval texts written hundreds of years ago to bring up some of the evidence I use. I do not only rely on Brittanica or Iranica or Encarta or what ever, I myself prefer information from before the 20th century, becuase the 20th century has been too greatly influenced by politics and natoinalism to find any real accurate information. +++$+++ ::::Sure, thats fine with me. Also, are we allowed to comment on the comments section? Because you mentioned something about having other secondary sources, I just want to say that that is exactly what I have done. I have even researched medieval texts written hundreds of years ago to bring up some of the evidence I use. I do not only rely on Brittanica or Iranica or Encarta or what ever, I myself prefer information from before the 20th century, becuase the 20th century has been too greatly influenced by politics and natoinalism to find any real accurate information.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 18:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
272964 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272959 +++$+++ 272959 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.161662100E09 +++$+++ Where do we go from here? GM has been gone for awhile, we cant just wait around forever for him to show up, he may not be back for awhile longer, and who knows, maybe hes purposely inactive for all we know. I think the case has already been made crystal clear on EL_C's talk page. GM doesnt really even have a case, I already met everything he asked for and more, he is just filibustering. THe page has already been locked for more than a week... and I've waited for a decision from El_C for more than a week (hes busy), and this really shouldnt be taking this long for us to finish this. +++$+++ :Where do we go from here? GM has been gone for awhile, we cant just wait around forever for him to show up, he may not be back for awhile longer, and who knows, maybe hes purposely inactive for all we know. I think the case has already been made crystal clear on EL_C's talk page. GM doesnt really even have a case, I already met everything he asked for and more, he is just filibustering. THe page has already been locked for more than a week... and I've waited for a decision from El_C for more than a week (hes busy), and this really shouldnt be taking this long for us to finish this.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 20:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
272965 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272959 +++$+++ 272964 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.161771420E09 +++$+++ No, admin [[User:Srikeit|Srikeit]] locked the [[Azerbaijan]] and  [[List of Azerbaijanis]] on GM's versions. I think I have made my case very very clear, and as you can see on El_C's talk page, GM did nothing but filibuster, he couldnt even make a case, all he did was repeat himself over and over again (hes very disruptive, he does this stuff a lot). Have you read El_C's talk page? There is no way that a person could be so busy that they cannot even reply to an e-mail. I check my e-mail several times a day, even at school, and still make time to reply. +++$+++ ::No, admin [[User:Srikeit|Srikeit]] locked the [[Azerbaijan]] and  [[List of Azerbaijanis]] on GM's versions. I think I have made my case very very clear, and as you can see on El_C's talk page, GM did nothing but filibuster, he couldnt even make a case, all he did was repeat himself over and over again (hes very disruptive, he does this stuff a lot). Have you read El_C's talk page? There is no way that a person could be so busy that they cannot even reply to an e-mail. I check my e-mail several times a day, even at school, and still make time to reply.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 03:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
272966 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272959 +++$+++ 272965 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.161822060E09 +++$+++ Urgent! GM is once again starting an edit war here: [[History of the name Azerbaijan]]. He is trying to push his POV while at the same time saying my edits are POV. I dont have time now, but I will explain everything later, but for now, in confidence of good will in me, could you please lock the article on my last version until we can get this sorted out, and so we can prevent another edit war. +++$+++ :::Urgent! GM is once again starting an edit war here: [[History of the name Azerbaijan]]. He is trying to push his POV while at the same time saying my edits are POV. I dont have time now, but I will explain everything later, but for now, in confidence of good will in me, could you please lock the article on my last version until we can get this sorted out, and so we can prevent another edit war.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 17:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
272967 +++$+++ Grandmaster +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272959 +++$+++ 272966 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.161829260E09 +++$+++ Hi. It looks like Khosrow is trying to manipulate you. He removed the edits that were agreed between me and Ali, and then removed sourced info added by another person, and when I restored those edits, he reverted me and now wants you to protect the article the way he wants to see it. In the meantime he keeps misinterpreting the sources that I provided, claiming that those he does not like are politically motivated without giving any proof of that, and distort selected passages from others. I really see no end to this. So far he has not cited a single authoritative source supporting his claims.  +++$+++ :::: Hi. It looks like Khosrow is trying to manipulate you. He removed the edits that were agreed between me and Ali, and then removed sourced info added by another person, and when I restored those edits, he reverted me and now wants you to protect the article the way he wants to see it. In the meantime he keeps misinterpreting the sources that I provided, claiming that those he does not like are politically motivated without giving any proof of that, and distort selected passages from others. I really see no end to this. So far he has not cited a single authoritative source supporting his claims. [[User:Grandmaster|Grandmaster]] 19:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
272968 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272959 +++$+++ 272964 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.161829680E09 +++$+++ GM, your credibility is already very low, as I have shown that you have a history of behaviour like this. Please do not try to turn this around. I have revealed your distortion on the talk page. The information I took out is due to repetitiveness, because what that quote is saying is already within the article. What Al Hamavi is saying is not what GM wants it to be, GM is distorting it. I am not one to take out sourced information unless I have a good reason that I can support. For example, I have still left the other quote in there, because as of now, I have no way to disprove it or a credible reason for taking it out. However, for this Hamavi quote, I do, and I have shown it. At best, we can add this source to the sentence in the article that says that sometimes many regions were combined into one large province, and add Hamavi's name to the list of figures that clearly distinguish between Azerbaijan and the region in the Caucasus. +++$+++ ::GM, your credibility is already very low, as I have shown that you have a history of behaviour like this. Please do not try to turn this around. I have revealed your distortion on the talk page. The information I took out is due to repetitiveness, because what that quote is saying is already within the article. What Al Hamavi is saying is not what GM wants it to be, GM is distorting it. I am not one to take out sourced information unless I have a good reason that I can support. For example, I have still left the other quote in there, because as of now, I have no way to disprove it or a credible reason for taking it out. However, for this Hamavi quote, I do, and I have shown it. At best, we can add this source to the sentence in the article that says that sometimes many regions were combined into one large province, and add Hamavi's name to the list of figures that clearly distinguish between Azerbaijan and the region in the Caucasus.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 19:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

535105 +++$+++ C-c-c-c +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-09 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.149917340E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I award you this Barnstar for your many, and many great contributions to Wikipedia. In the face of adversity you have shown great strength in dealing with sockpuppets, meatpuppets and Wiki-stalkers alike, and not mention have maintained a tirelss NPOV battle with nationalist users on every and any side. You'll be a great admin in no time. Cheers:)   +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you this Barnstar for your many, and many great contributions to Wikipedia. In the face of adversity you have shown great strength in dealing with sockpuppets, meatpuppets and Wiki-stalkers alike, and not mention have maintained a tirelss NPOV battle with nationalist users on every and any side. You'll be a great admin in no time. Cheers:)  [[User:C-c-c-c|C-c-c-c]] 22:29, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
535106 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535105 +++$+++ 535105 +++$+++ 2006-06-10 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.149966360E09 +++$+++ No problem. Please inform any other interested parties if you can. Thanks, --[[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :No problem. Please inform any other interested parties if you can. Thanks, --[[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 12:06, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

535107 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535107 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-10 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.149986460E09 +++$+++ Hi Asterion - you'd added \"plus the Patagonian [[Lupinus polyphyllus]]\" to the list of edible lupins; there is an error in there, as ''L. polyphyllus'' is a North American species, not Patagonian. I've removed this from the article for now; if you can find out which Patagonian species is so used there, please re-insert it - thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Asterion - you'd added "plus the Patagonian [[Lupinus polyphyllus]]" to the list of edible lupins; there is an error in there, as ''L. polyphyllus'' is a North American species, not Patagonian. I've removed this from the article for now; if you can find out which Patagonian species is so used there, please re-insert it - thanks, [[User:MPF|MPF]] 17:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
535108 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535107 +++$+++ 535107 +++$+++ 2006-06-10 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.149986640E09 +++$+++ Hi MPF, the Lupinus polyphyllus is definitely cultivated in the Patagonia. I was unaware it was not autochtonous though. Regards, --[[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Hi MPF, the Lupinus polyphyllus is definitely cultivated in the Patagonia. I was unaware it was not autochtonous though. Regards, --[[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 17:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
535109 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535107 +++$+++ 535108 +++$+++ 2006-06-10 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.149987600E09 +++$+++ Thanks; by all means mention that (I'll add it in later if you don't want to now; can't myself just now as I'm offline for an hour or two shortly) -  +++$+++ ::Thanks; by all means mention that (I'll add it in later if you don't want to now; can't myself just now as I'm offline for an hour or two shortly) - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 18:00, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
535110 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535107 +++$+++ 535107 +++$+++ 2006-06-10 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.149990300E09 +++$+++ I'm really sorry. I think I actually made a mistake. I confused Lupinus hirsutus or Altramuz Azul (Blue Lupin) with Lupinus polyphyllus, which is also blue (and present in Argentina, but mainly as a decorative plant and\/or animal forage). This is the problem with relying on internet sources and with possible mistranslations. I apologise profusely. I will amend the article in that sense. In all cases, the plant is not autochtonous either, so it should go under Mediterranean too. Regards, --[[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :I'm really sorry. I think I actually made a mistake. I confused Lupinus hirsutus or Altramuz Azul (Blue Lupin) with Lupinus polyphyllus, which is also blue (and present in Argentina, but mainly as a decorative plant and/or animal forage). This is the problem with relying on internet sources and with possible mistranslations. I apologise profusely. I will amend the article in that sense. In all cases, the plant is not autochtonous either, so it should go under Mediterranean too. Regards, --[[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 18:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
535111 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535107 +++$+++ 535107 +++$+++ 2006-06-10 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.149993060E09 +++$+++ That is not a problem. Thanks for replying. Cheers, --[[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :That is not a problem. Thanks for replying. Cheers, --[[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 19:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

307638 +++$+++ Bobblewik +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-15 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.142449380E09 +++$+++ You may wish to see the proposal at: [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#linking_of_dates]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ You may wish to see the proposal at: [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#linking_of_dates]]. Thanks. [[User:Bobblewik|bobblewik]] 11:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
307639 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307638 +++$+++ 307638 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Not sure what's going on, but this Nlu admin keeps reverting my talk page whenever I archive it and he deletes my question of why he is doing it whenever I ask it on his talk page.  Can you speak to him on my behalf?  Thanks.  Policeman of the Control Freak Wikipedia Editors 22:00, 18 March 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :Not sure what's going on, but this Nlu admin keeps reverting my talk page whenever I archive it and he deletes my question of why he is doing it whenever I ask it on his talk page.  Can you speak to him on my behalf?  Thanks.  Policeman of the Control Freak Wikipedia Editors 22:00, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
307640 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307638 +++$+++ 307639 +++$+++ 2006-03-18 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.142752680E09 +++$+++ Markyu, playing games with pushing the link to the bottom of an otherwise blank talk page wasn't in the instructions I pointed out to you, and your sig is lacking in tact and diplomacy. While you're blocked you can try drafting productive polite edits that make a positive contribution to Wikipedia: Nlu has rightly pointed out the consequences if you can't manage that. .. +++$+++ ::Markyu, playing games with pushing the link to the bottom of an otherwise blank talk page wasn't in the instructions I pointed out to you, and your sig is lacking in tact and diplomacy. While you're blocked you can try drafting productive polite edits that make a positive contribution to Wikipedia: Nlu has rightly pointed out the consequences if you can't manage that. ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 23:18, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

10822 +++$+++ Justin_A_Kuntz +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-30 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.241126580E09 +++$+++ You might like to look at the links you're adding, [[Deutschland]] directs to [[Germany]] not [[German pocket battleship Deutschland]] as I presume you intended.  '' +++$+++ You might like to look at the links you're adding, [[Deutschland]] directs to [[Germany]] not [[German pocket battleship Deutschland]] as I presume you intended.  ''[[User:Justin_A_Kuntz|Justin]]'' <small>''[[User Talk:Justin_A_Kuntz|talk]]''</small> 14:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
10823 +++$+++ Justin_A_Kuntz +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10822 +++$+++ 10822 +++$+++ 2009-04-30 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.241138040E09 +++$+++ No need to be so prickly, it was just a friendly comment in case you hadn't noticed.  '' +++$+++ :No need to be so prickly, it was just a friendly comment in case you hadn't noticed.  ''[[User:Justin_A_Kuntz|Justin]]'' <small>''[[User Talk:Justin_A_Kuntz|talk]]''</small> 17:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

535112 +++$+++ Valentinejoesmith +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-10 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.149997440E09 +++$+++ Hi, Asterion. I noticed that you paid attention to the [[Gaza Beach Massacre]]. Do you have any suggestion as to what could be done to fix this article? It seems POV and kinda inaccurate. Please respond on my talk or on the article's talk. Cheers  +++$+++ Hi, Asterion. I noticed that you paid attention to the [[Gaza Beach Massacre]]. Do you have any suggestion as to what could be done to fix this article? It seems POV and kinda inaccurate. Please respond on my talk or on the article's talk. Cheers [[User:Valentinejoesmith|V. Joe]] 20:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
535113 +++$+++ Valentinejoesmith +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535112 +++$+++ 535112 +++$+++ 2006-06-10 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.149997980E09 +++$+++ Hi, again. To be truthful, I suspect the GBM is a hoax, but I have no means of proving it with the sparse information involved. I also suspect that the author of the page has a strong anti-Israeli bias towards the conflict. Personally, I might be accused of the opposite, but it rarely matters since it isn't a major concern with me. If you want it deleted, I'll support that. Cheers  +++$+++ :Hi, again. To be truthful, I suspect the GBM is a hoax, but I have no means of proving it with the sparse information involved. I also suspect that the author of the page has a strong anti-Israeli bias towards the conflict. Personally, I might be accused of the opposite, but it rarely matters since it isn't a major concern with me. If you want it deleted, I'll support that. Cheers [[User:Valentinejoesmith|V. Joe]] 20:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

10825 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-30 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.246417140E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've noticed that you have been conducting copyedits of a number of articles I have worked with, most recently [[Battle of San Domingo]]. I appreciate your interest and efforts and your grammatical changes are welcome, but I have a problem with your habit of breaking paragraphs up to form a number of much smaller sections. I find that any benefits these changes bring are greatly outweighed both by making the article appear less attractive and professional and reducing the ease of reading and understanding by reducing its coherence (when I wrote it I chose the paragraph breaks deliberately to develop seperate themes). I'm not going to conduct wholesale reverts of your work because your grammar changes are helpful, but I will be assessing the broken paragraphs and remerging if I think its appropriate, pending further discussion here or on the article's talk page. Can I ask in future that you make these edits one by one so I can see more clearly what changes you have made? It will make it easier to assess which of your changes I agree with. Regards-- +++$+++ Hi, I've noticed that you have been conducting copyedits of a number of articles I have worked with, most recently [[Battle of San Domingo]]. I appreciate your interest and efforts and your grammatical changes are welcome, but I have a problem with your habit of breaking paragraphs up to form a number of much smaller sections. I find that any benefits these changes bring are greatly outweighed both by making the article appear less attractive and professional and reducing the ease of reading and understanding by reducing its coherence (when I wrote it I chose the paragraph breaks deliberately to develop seperate themes). I'm not going to conduct wholesale reverts of your work because your grammar changes are helpful, but I will be assessing the broken paragraphs and remerging if I think its appropriate, pending further discussion here or on the article's talk page. Can I ask in future that you make these edits one by one so I can see more clearly what changes you have made? It will make it easier to assess which of your changes I agree with. Regards--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 19:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
10826 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10825 +++$+++ 10825 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.246419000E09 +++$+++ Will do. However, I would argue that breaking up text makes it easier to read, and makes the article look less ponderous.  Note that newspapers, bloggers, and others trying to entice busy readers tend to break up their text. That said, I certainly won't take offense at your merging paragraphs. We are both striving to create readable, interesting articles.  +++$+++ :Will do. However, I would argue that breaking up text makes it easier to read, and makes the article look less ponderous.  Note that newspapers, bloggers, and others trying to entice busy readers tend to break up their text. That said, I certainly won't take offense at your merging paragraphs. We are both striving to create readable, interesting articles. [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 20:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
10827 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10825 +++$+++ 10826 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.246419900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply - I would counter that this is neither a newspaper nor a blog but an enecylopedia, and that while breaking up text can make something easier to read it doesn't always. However I would be happy to discuss this further and work on this with you on a case by case basis in future. Thanks-- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the reply - I would counter that this is neither a newspaper nor a blog but an enecylopedia, and that while breaking up text can make something easier to read it doesn't always. However I would be happy to discuss this further and work on this with you on a case by case basis in future. Thanks--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 20:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
10828 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10825 +++$+++ 10827 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.246421640E09 +++$+++ Roger that. I tend to split paras where I read them as representing different thoughts or issues, even if the two parts are related. Again, for me that enhances readability. Clearly, your mileage differs. :-) Regards,  +++$+++ :::Roger that. I tend to split paras where I read them as representing different thoughts or issues, even if the two parts are related. Again, for me that enhances readability. Clearly, your mileage differs. :-) Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 21:14, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
10829 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10825 +++$+++ 10828 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.246422480E09 +++$+++ In any in reading or writing an article, I try to think about how a reader interacts with paragraphs and have developed the following rules (they are far from exclusive or omnipotent, but I've always found them a good guideline): 1) Paragraphs should contain one solid theme that links the sentences - this can be a running theme that links several ideas, but the connections should be obvious and the ideas related 2) The lead should bever be less than two or more than four paragraphs - three is usually preferable - this is enought to simulate and inform a passing reader or novice in the subject without seeming to bombard them with too many ideas 3) Length is key - too short and the idea seems underdeveloped or tacked on, too long and it becomes boring - I use a wide browser at home and as a rule of thumb I keep my paragraphs to more than five and less than ten lines on my screen. I find this the easiest size to read at and absorb ideas. 4) The number of paragraphs in a section is important, again it is about find the right balance between too long and too short. I usually use the same principle as with the lead - more than one and less than five. If there are too many then employ appropriate subheadings. 5) The placement of images - always tricky, should be considered partly on the basis of the paragraphs around them, causing as little disruption as possible to the text. I'm not telling you this to try to force you to ahere to this personal guideline, just to explain my position based on my experience.-- +++$+++ ::::In any in reading or writing an article, I try to think about how a reader interacts with paragraphs and have developed the following rules (they are far from exclusive or omnipotent, but I've always found them a good guideline): 1) Paragraphs should contain one solid theme that links the sentences - this can be a running theme that links several ideas, but the connections should be obvious and the ideas related 2) The lead should bever be less than two or more than four paragraphs - three is usually preferable - this is enought to simulate and inform a passing reader or novice in the subject without seeming to bombard them with too many ideas 3) Length is key - too short and the idea seems underdeveloped or tacked on, too long and it becomes boring - I use a wide browser at home and as a rule of thumb I keep my paragraphs to more than five and less than ten lines on my screen. I find this the easiest size to read at and absorb ideas. 4) The number of paragraphs in a section is important, again it is about find the right balance between too long and too short. I usually use the same principle as with the lead - more than one and less than five. If there are too many then employ appropriate subheadings. 5) The placement of images - always tricky, should be considered partly on the basis of the paragraphs around them, causing as little disruption as possible to the text. I'm not telling you this to try to force you to ahere to this personal guideline, just to explain my position based on my experience.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 21:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
10830 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10825 +++$+++ 10829 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.246482300E09 +++$+++ Good guidelines, and I have no quarrel with them at all.  I think where we differ in practice, if not in theory, is in our personal sense of what constitutes a solid theme for a paragraph. In the dichotomy (in the sense of \"there are two kinds of people, those that think there are two kinds of people, and those that do not) between splitters and lumpers, I tend to be a splitter. Paragraphing aside, in my stylistic edits, I try to make things faster to read. That means: active voice rather than passive; shorter, less complex sentences; and repetition of names to avoid referential terms, i.e., \"Admiral So-and-So\", rather than \"he\", etc.  +++$+++ :::::Good guidelines, and I have no quarrel with them at all.  I think where we differ in practice, if not in theory, is in our personal sense of what constitutes a solid theme for a paragraph. In the dichotomy (in the sense of "there are two kinds of people, those that think there are two kinds of people, and those that do not) between splitters and lumpers, I tend to be a splitter. Paragraphing aside, in my stylistic edits, I try to make things faster to read. That means: active voice rather than passive; shorter, less complex sentences; and repetition of names to avoid referential terms, i.e., "Admiral So-and-So", rather than "he", etc. [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 14:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

535115 +++$+++ Voice of All +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535115 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-11 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.150081320E09 +++$+++ Script can be found (for monobook skin) at  +++$+++ Script can be found (for monobook skin) at [[User:Voice of All/UsefulJS]]. It marks up the contribs page with what it "thought" of edits so you know when it makes any mistakes. Out of 5000, it sometimes makes 1-3, somtimes "negating" each other. Whenever I run it on RfA, I check to make sure that there is not a key mistake causing to misread a lot of edits (this only uccurs when the same summary is used again and again and it is misread). When that does happen, I fix the JS, run it again, and then post the stats, so if you want the tool for personal use go ahead, but please don't start posting it on RfAs as there is a small chance that is will do unfair harm to the candidate.'''[[User talk:Voice of All|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue">-of-</font><font color="black">All</font>]]''' 20:02, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
535116 +++$+++ Voice of All +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535115 +++$+++ 535115 +++$+++ 2006-06-11 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.150082760E09 +++$+++ I moved the CSS stuff into your monobook.css page.''' +++$+++ :I moved the CSS stuff into your monobook.css page.'''[[User talk:Voice of All|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue">-of-</font><font color="black">All</font>]]''' 20:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

10831 +++$+++ Toufik-de-planoise +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10831 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-28 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.248845700E09 +++$+++ Hey', thanks for your contribution about [[Battant (Besan\xe7on)|Battant]]  +++$+++ Hey', thanks for your contribution about [[Battant (Besançon)|Battant]] [[User:Toufik-de-planoise|Toufik-de-planoise]] ([[User talk:Toufik-de-planoise|talk]]) 22:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
10832 +++$+++ Toufik-de-planoise +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10831 +++$+++ 10831 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.248859380E09 +++$+++ Okey', thank very much, because i want improve the pages about [[Besan\xe7on]], but my english is often bad^^ so good evening :)  +++$+++ : Okey', thank very much, because i want improve the pages about [[Besançon]], but my english is often bad^^ so good evening :) [[User:Toufik-de-planoise|Toufik-de-planoise]] ([[User talk:Toufik-de-planoise|talk]]) 02:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

272977 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-11 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.160575980E09 +++$+++ Hello again, fellow \"alliance\" member (eh, maybe you don't remember that).  Thanks for deleting [[:Image:Jim henson animations.jpg]] and [[Muppets goes to the moon the movie]].  The editor also created [[Jim henson animations]], which [[User:Goldom|Goldom]] deleted.  I had asked him to delete the two you deleted, since he deleted the first one.  I wasn't sure what was up with those articles.  Very strange. =\\ --  +++$+++ Hello again, fellow "alliance" member (eh, maybe you don't remember that).  Thanks for deleting [[:Image:Jim henson animations.jpg]] and [[Muppets goes to the moon the movie]].  The editor also created [[Jim henson animations]], which [[User:Goldom|Goldom]] deleted.  I had asked him to delete the two you deleted, since he deleted the first one.  I wasn't sure what was up with those articles.  Very strange. =\ -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 07:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
272978 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272977 +++$+++ 272977 +++$+++ 2006-10-11 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.160577840E09 +++$+++ Re [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=80773785&oldid=80563244 your message]: I did leave the editor a note after I tagged both articles (perhaps a bit too formal in tone), but didn't hear anything back.  I'll check on him in a couple of days. --  +++$+++ :Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=80773785&oldid=80563244 your message]: I did leave the editor a note after I tagged both articles (perhaps a bit too formal in tone), but didn't hear anything back.  I'll check on him in a couple of days. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 07:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
272979 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272977 +++$+++ 272978 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.160921520E09 +++$+++ Well, I checked in on {{User|Cool.rickz}} and his edits are still just as strange.  [[The koala twins]] is made up stuff that's on a PROD that should really be speedy deleted.  I just tagged [[Canada muppets\/mupgarden]] for speedy deletion.  I'm not even sure what to think of [[Millimages]]. =\\  [[User:Consumed Crustacean|Consumed Crustacean]] blocked him for a day, but he came right back.  Maybe it's time to just block the account?  I dunno, it's really weird. --  +++$+++ ::Well, I checked in on {{User|Cool.rickz}} and his edits are still just as strange.  [[The koala twins]] is made up stuff that's on a PROD that should really be speedy deleted.  I just tagged [[Canada muppets/mupgarden]] for speedy deletion.  I'm not even sure what to think of [[Millimages]]. =\  [[User:Consumed Crustacean|Consumed Crustacean]] blocked him for a day, but he came right back.  Maybe it's time to just block the account?  I dunno, it's really weird. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 07:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
272980 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272977 +++$+++ 272979 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.160925000E09 +++$+++ Re [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=81551533&oldid=81432633 your message]: Thanks.  If I remember, I'll check in on him after his block is up. --  +++$+++ :::Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=81551533&oldid=81432633 your message]: Thanks.  If I remember, I'll check in on him after his block is up. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 08:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

482403 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482403 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-24 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.172312940E09 +++$+++ This one is a minor candidate. So far he's only messed with one article. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Chrisw50]  +++$+++ This one is a minor candidate. So far he's only messed with one article. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Chrisw50] [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 02:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
482404 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482403 +++$+++ 482403 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.172313180E09 +++$+++ That's enough for me.  It's obviously not someone trying to learn their way around.  It's a throwaway account.  \u2014 +++$+++ :That's enough for me.  It's obviously not someone trying to learn their way around.  It's a throwaway account.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 02:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

272981 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272981 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-25 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.161843360E09 +++$+++ Well, the block is up and he's back... Sigh.  I just reverted this edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Nick_Jr.&diff=prev&oldid=83720171].  Checking on the Deletion Log of the added article [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/delete&page=InsideMuppets], Lucky 6.9 noted ''\"Incomprehensible, unsalvageable\"''.  It must have been bad because I've seen Lucky salvage bad articles before.  And there was a new image uploaded [[:Image:Castle_poster.jpg]].  I can't tell if it was used for anything because it was uploaded a couple of days ago. --  +++$+++ Well, the block is up and he's back... Sigh.  I just reverted this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Jr.&diff=prev&oldid=83720171].  Checking on the Deletion Log of the added article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=InsideMuppets], Lucky 6.9 noted ''"Incomprehensible, unsalvageable"''.  It must have been bad because I've seen Lucky salvage bad articles before.  And there was a new image uploaded [[:Image:Castle_poster.jpg]].  I can't tell if it was used for anything because it was uploaded a couple of days ago. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 23:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
272982 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272981 +++$+++ 272981 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.161997860E09 +++$+++ Last follow-up (I hope)... After I noticed he created [[Fireman Archibald the Koala]], [[Doctor Archibald the Koala]], [[Archibald the Koala]] and added them to [[HIT Entertainment]] and [[Nick Jr.]], [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] blocked him indefinitely. --  +++$+++ :Last follow-up (I hope)... After I noticed he created [[Fireman Archibald the Koala]], [[Doctor Archibald the Koala]], [[Archibald the Koala]] and added them to [[HIT Entertainment]] and [[Nick Jr.]], [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] blocked him indefinitely. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 18:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

10838 +++$+++ John Vandenberg +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10838 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-27 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.251414660E09 +++$+++ btw, I have given you the [[Wikipedia:Rollback]] permission. <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ btw, I have given you the [[Wikipedia:Rollback]] permission. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 16:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
10839 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10838 +++$+++ 10838 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.251419700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the rollback permission. Appreciate it. I hope it speeds up getting rid of vandalism. Why people vandalize has always baffled me. It requires no skill. Still, they do. Regards,  +++$+++ : Thanks for the rollback permission. Appreciate it. I hope it speeds up getting rid of vandalism. Why people vandalize has always baffled me. It requires no skill. Still, they do. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 17:35, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
10840 +++$+++ John Vandenberg +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10838 +++$+++ 10839 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.251439440E09 +++$+++ Thanks once more for pointing me in the right direction. <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks once more for pointing me in the right direction. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 23:04, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
10841 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10838 +++$+++ 10840 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.251452220E09 +++$+++ I did some Googling and found the convict ship. The sources are contradictory, some giving the year as 1797 and others as 1798. I tend to lean towards the 1797 as most of those seem more original.  I couldn't find anything about any prior or subsequent trips or what happened to the ship. I am afraid that we aren't going to find anything. Too few records survived, and we may not be looking in the right places.  There are probably insurers' records from Lloyds, if they still exist, and port records from various Indian ports, but even if they do exist, they might as well not. As the matter is tangential to both of us, I am going to let it drop. Regards,  +++$+++ :::I did some Googling and found the convict ship. The sources are contradictory, some giving the year as 1797 and others as 1798. I tend to lean towards the 1797 as most of those seem more original.  I couldn't find anything about any prior or subsequent trips or what happened to the ship. I am afraid that we aren't going to find anything. Too few records survived, and we may not be looking in the right places.  There are probably insurers' records from Lloyds, if they still exist, and port records from various Indian ports, but even if they do exist, they might as well not. As the matter is tangential to both of us, I am going to let it drop. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 02:37, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

272983 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-11 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.160586060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help. :) --  +++$+++ Thanks for the help. :) -- [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] 10:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
272984 +++$+++ Thatcher131 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272983 +++$+++ 272983 +++$+++ 2006-10-11 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.160590500E09 +++$+++ Sarah, at this point I would suggest blocking for 24 hours for incivility; yes, she can get a new IP any time but then you can immediately block that IP for the remainder of the 24 hours for block evasion. I blocked her a couple of days ago but lifted it early when I filed an RFAR so she could reply.  +++$+++ :Sarah, at this point I would suggest blocking for 24 hours for incivility; yes, she can get a new IP any time but then you can immediately block that IP for the remainder of the 24 hours for block evasion. I blocked her a couple of days ago but lifted it early when I filed an RFAR so she could reply. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 11:15, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
272985 +++$+++ Thatcher131 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272983 +++$+++ 272984 +++$+++ 2006-10-11 11:34:00 +++$+++ 1.160591640E09 +++$+++ Even though her main range includes 65000 addresses, almost all of her contributions come from the ranges 203.54.186.0\/24 and 203.54.9.0\/24, each of which range includes only 256 addresses.  (I suspect her local telephone exchange is only served by these two ranges.)  If we were to block anonymous editing only with account creation enabled, the block would not affect any registered users, or anyone who wanted to create a new username, and would only potentially only affect a small number of people in her local area who might also wish to contribute anonymously.  If you look at the list of IPs on her RFC, none of them have any contributions that are not obviously her. (is that a triple negative)?  Anyway, I would definitely use the rangeblocks I suggested if she repeats her behavior.  +++$+++ ::Even though her main range includes 65000 addresses, almost all of her contributions come from the ranges 203.54.186.0/24 and 203.54.9.0/24, each of which range includes only 256 addresses.  (I suspect her local telephone exchange is only served by these two ranges.)  If we were to block anonymous editing only with account creation enabled, the block would not affect any registered users, or anyone who wanted to create a new username, and would only potentially only affect a small number of people in her local area who might also wish to contribute anonymously.  If you look at the list of IPs on her RFC, none of them have any contributions that are not obviously her. (is that a triple negative)?  Anyway, I would definitely use the rangeblocks I suggested if she repeats her behavior. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 11:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

10842 +++$+++ Notpietru +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10842 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.251513900E09 +++$+++ Hey there; I saw that you took the time to edit the Valletta article, but didn't remove user Jasalf's edit. How so?  +++$+++ Hey there; I saw that you took the time to edit the Valletta article, but didn't remove user Jasalf's edit. How so? [[User:Notpietru|Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση]] ([[User talk:Notpietru|talk]]) 19:45, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
10843 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10842 +++$+++ 10842 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.251517680E09 +++$+++ Two reasons. 1) I tend to give users with a username the benefit of the doubt. 2) I watched the video and liked it. I have been to Valletta and video seemed to do a good job of showing the sites. I figured that if anyone didn't want to watch it they could skip right over it. Regards,  +++$+++ :Two reasons. 1) I tend to give users with a username the benefit of the doubt. 2) I watched the video and liked it. I have been to Valletta and video seemed to do a good job of showing the sites. I figured that if anyone didn't want to watch it they could skip right over it. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 20:48, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
10844 +++$+++ Notpietru +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10842 +++$+++ 10843 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.251519240E09 +++$+++ I see. You may want to tailor your edits in line with Wikipedia policies in future. PS. Please don't leave alerts on my talkpage.  +++$+++ ::I see. You may want to tailor your edits in line with Wikipedia policies in future. PS. Please don't leave alerts on my talkpage. [[User:Notpietru|Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση]] ([[User talk:Notpietru|talk]]) 21:14, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
10845 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10842 +++$+++ 10844 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.251520260E09 +++$+++ Which policies in particular would that be? Just asking. As for the alert, apologies. Some people prefer them. Clearly, you don't.  +++$+++ :::Which policies in particular would that be? Just asking. As for the alert, apologies. Some people prefer them. Clearly, you don't. [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 21:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
10846 +++$+++ Notpietru +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10842 +++$+++ 10843 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.251521460E09 +++$+++ I just find the alert intrusive, and have this page on my watchlist anyway. Re. Policies, surely it's not acceptable to link youtube videos within the body of an article? And if you saw that the mistake had been made (and went so far as to follow the link) isn't it one's implicit obligation, as a fine, upstanding wikipedian, to correct the oversight rather than leaving it for others to clean up\/continue to mar the article? Maybe that's just my understanding of the project.  +++$+++ ::I just find the alert intrusive, and have this page on my watchlist anyway. Re. Policies, surely it's not acceptable to link youtube videos within the body of an article? And if you saw that the mistake had been made (and went so far as to follow the link) isn't it one's implicit obligation, as a fine, upstanding wikipedian, to correct the oversight rather than leaving it for others to clean up/continue to mar the article? Maybe that's just my understanding of the project. [[User:Notpietru|Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση]] ([[User talk:Notpietru|talk]]) 21:51, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
10847 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10842 +++$+++ 10843 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.251536280E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. On the alerts, may I recommend you do what some other people do that have strong feelings about these things - they put up a statement at the top of their talk page specifying their policies. That's where I got the idea of using trackback. I don't care, so I haven't put up anything. As for the video, you are correct. I should have moved it into \"External Links\". I just didn't think of it at the time. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Fair enough. On the alerts, may I recommend you do what some other people do that have strong feelings about these things - they put up a statement at the top of their talk page specifying their policies. That's where I got the idea of using trackback. I don't care, so I haven't put up anything. As for the video, you are correct. I should have moved it into "External Links". I just didn't think of it at the time. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 01:58, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
10848 +++$+++ Notpietru +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10842 +++$+++ 10842 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.251858780E09 +++$+++ Re.[[Malta]], thanks for your continued work on the flow and style of the article. Much appreciated.  +++$+++ :Re.[[Malta]], thanks for your continued work on the flow and style of the article. Much appreciated. [[User:Notpietru|Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση]] ([[User talk:Notpietru|talk]]) 19:33, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
10849 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10842 +++$+++ 10848 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.251866100E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Writing appears to be in my skill set, and I am glad to deploy it in this way as I enjoyed the five days I spent visiting Malta. To change the subject, what would you think about drastically cutting the History section of the article on Malta? The Malta article is too long, with the result that the page loads and updates slowly. Also, my impression is that the History section is actually better than the specialized article, and that moving the material from the Malta article to the History of Malta article would solve the problem. What do you think? I wanted to get your opinion before I raised the question on the Malta article's talk page. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Thanks. Writing appears to be in my skill set, and I am glad to deploy it in this way as I enjoyed the five days I spent visiting Malta. To change the subject, what would you think about drastically cutting the History section of the article on Malta? The Malta article is too long, with the result that the page loads and updates slowly. Also, my impression is that the History section is actually better than the specialized article, and that moving the material from the Malta article to the History of Malta article would solve the problem. What do you think? I wanted to get your opinion before I raised the question on the Malta article's talk page. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 21:35, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
10850 +++$+++ Notpietru +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10842 +++$+++ 10842 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.251867180E09 +++$+++ I don't think the section would benefit from major cuts; Malta's history is extensive by any standards. If you're willing to move some of the information to the relevant article, that works too.... but it shouldn't be at the expense of the [[Malta]] article. Streamlining it may be helpful but as you've said, you were a tourist (for five days...) on the island and while your talent for cleaning up the text is much appreciated, selecting which parts of Maltese history are valuable or not would probably receive greatest benefit from somebody better versed in the subject. I don't think the sections are particularly long, considering the length of time (5,000+ years) they cover. It is very similar in structure to that found in, for example, [[England]].  +++$+++ :I don't think the section would benefit from major cuts; Malta's history is extensive by any standards. If you're willing to move some of the information to the relevant article, that works too.... but it shouldn't be at the expense of the [[Malta]] article. Streamlining it may be helpful but as you've said, you were a tourist (for five days...) on the island and while your talent for cleaning up the text is much appreciated, selecting which parts of Maltese history are valuable or not would probably receive greatest benefit from somebody better versed in the subject. I don't think the sections are particularly long, considering the length of time (5,000+ years) they cover. It is very similar in structure to that found in, for example, [[England]]. [[User:Notpietru|Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση]] ([[User talk:Notpietru|talk]]) 21:53, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

272987 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-13 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.160740800E09 +++$+++ citing you as his authority. The edit war has in fact involved another user attempting to alter the text  Dunn originally contributed to the page in question, trying several alternatives to Dunn's preferred text, and Dunn reverting all the alterations. This is not my understanding of 3RR, and I've said so. If you agree, would you say so to Dunn? He sounds like the sort of user who pays more attention to what admins tell him. Regards,  +++$+++ citing you as his authority. The edit war has in fact involved another user attempting to alter the text  Dunn originally contributed to the page in question, trying several alternatives to Dunn's preferred text, and Dunn reverting all the alterations. This is not my understanding of 3RR, and I've said so. If you agree, would you say so to Dunn? He sounds like the sort of user who pays more attention to what admins tell him. Regards, [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 05:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
272988 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272987 +++$+++ 272987 +++$+++ 2006-10-13 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.160741040E09 +++$+++ Since this is about Dunn, I would also like to make a complaint. We were debating on another talk page and he just splices my posts and adds his words in between. I keep telling him that its not ok to cut peoples posts with yours and that he should post under other peoples posts. He insists that I shouldnt \"lecture\" him, but this is what you yourself told me Sarah. I'm also asking him to change his post but he refuses. This may be the same as the case mentioned above. +++$+++ :Since this is about Dunn, I would also like to make a complaint. We were debating on another talk page and he just splices my posts and adds his words in between. I keep telling him that its not ok to cut peoples posts with yours and that he should post under other peoples posts. He insists that I shouldnt "lecture" him, but this is what you yourself told me Sarah. I'm also asking him to change his post but he refuses. This may be the same as the case mentioned above.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 05:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
272989 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272987 +++$+++ 272988 +++$+++ 2006-10-13 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.160741520E09 +++$+++ No, this is pure chance; I don't think you've contributed to the page in question; at least not recently. And this is a war in article text, not talk page etiquette. (On which my opinion is mixed; if you have a lot of short replies to short points, interlineation may be clearer; but he certainly shouldn't keep on when asked not to.)  +++$+++ ::No, this is pure chance; I don't think you've contributed to the page in question; at least not recently. And this is a war in article text, not talk page etiquette. (On which my opinion is mixed; if you have a lot of short replies to short points, interlineation may be clearer; but he certainly shouldn't keep on when asked not to.) [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 05:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
272990 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272987 +++$+++ 272989 +++$+++ 2006-10-13 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.160741820E09 +++$+++ This is on another talk page, just thought I'd mention it. +++$+++ :::This is on another talk page, just thought I'd mention it.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 05:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
272991 +++$+++ Morgan Wright +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272987 +++$+++ 272988 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.160900160E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia and we hope you will continue to contribute, but you need to cite here why you say Crown land is mainly used for airports. What is your reference? Wikipedia is meant to be used as an encyclopedia, and you don't list the source where you got the total land used for airports vs. other uses for Crown Land. You say half of all the land in Australia is Crown Land, (without references) and that it is mainly used for airports. Are you suggesting that half of all the land in Australia is used for airports? That's a lot of reeeeeeally big airports. If you don't cite references, you run the risk of your statement being deleted (read, WILL be deleted).  +++$+++ ::Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia and we hope you will continue to contribute, but you need to cite here why you say Crown land is mainly used for airports. What is your reference? Wikipedia is meant to be used as an encyclopedia, and you don't list the source where you got the total land used for airports vs. other uses for Crown Land. You say half of all the land in Australia is Crown Land, (without references) and that it is mainly used for airports. Are you suggesting that half of all the land in Australia is used for airports? That's a lot of reeeeeeally big airports. If you don't cite references, you run the risk of your statement being deleted (read, WILL be deleted). [[User:Morgan Wright|Morgan Wright]] 01:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
272992 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272987 +++$+++ 272987 +++$+++ 2006-10-14 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.160849640E09 +++$+++ I gave it a firm copyedit and cleaned up some of the extra stuff. I think it is looking better. [[Jason Shand]] -- +++$+++ :I gave it a firm copyedit and cleaned up some of the extra stuff. I think it is looking better. [[Jason Shand]] --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 11:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
272993 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272987 +++$+++ 272992 +++$+++ 2006-10-14 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.160850780E09 +++$+++ I agree and took out some more cruftiness. Thanks also for that wee fix to this talk page earlier. I suspect we could reference much of the article (now) from the MFR site. -- +++$+++ ::I agree and took out some more cruftiness. Thanks also for that wee fix to this talk page earlier. I suspect we could reference much of the article (now) from the MFR site. --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 11:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
272994 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 272987 +++$+++ 272993 +++$+++ 2006-10-14 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.160851200E09 +++$+++ Not at all, I enjoyed doing it. I am tempted now to listen to one of the shows! Best wishes -- +++$+++ :::Not at all, I enjoyed doing it. I am tempted now to listen to one of the shows! Best wishes --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 11:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

535132 +++$+++  +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-25 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.146033120E09 +++$+++ We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and <big> '''[[Special:Userlogin|create an account]]'''<\/big>. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your posts]] and comments with four tildes ('''&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;'''), which will let others know who left it. -- +++$+++ We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and <big> '''[[Special:Userlogin|create an account]]'''</big>. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your posts]] and comments with four tildes ('''&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;'''), which will let others know who left it. --[[User:Asterion|Asterion]] <sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">talk to me</font>]]</sup>[[Image:Andalucialibre_flag.jpg|25px]] 23:32, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
535133 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535132 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-23 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.151101500E09 +++$+++ You should be aware that your quoted text is simply a <nowiki>{{subst:welcome}}<\/nowiki> template. I hope you realise that calmly discussing things will get your point across. It seems that you are obviously not a new user, so I suspect you are simply using unsigned edits to edit war. Whatever your reasons, this is unacceptable. Regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::You should be aware that your quoted text is simply a <nowiki>{{subst:welcome}}</nowiki> template. I hope you realise that calmly discussing things will get your point across. It seems that you are obviously not a new user, so I suspect you are simply using unsigned edits to edit war. Whatever your reasons, this is unacceptable. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 15:25, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

307642 +++$+++ Kenosis +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-21 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.142983440E09 +++$+++ I've appreciated encountering (and more recently interacting with) your well considered perspectives and summary analyses of what actually is going on with many of these issues... +++$+++ I've appreciated encountering (and more recently interacting with) your well considered perspectives and summary analyses of what actually is going on with many of these issues...[[User:Kenosis|Kenosis]] 15:24, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
307643 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307642 +++$+++ 307642 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.143070260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the compliment, and for clarifying that sentence. .. +++$+++ :Thanks for the compliment, and for clarifying that sentence. ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:31, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

535136 +++$+++ MichaelBillington +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535136 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-29 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.151587980E09 +++$+++ On [[User talk:70.101.7.245]], we both warned the same user for the same page (about two minutes apart) . I removed your warning so that we don't bite the newbies, I hope you don't mind.  +++$+++ On [[User talk:70.101.7.245]], we both warned the same user for the same page (about two minutes apart) . I removed your warning so that we don't bite the newbies, I hope you don't mind. [[User:MichaelBillington|MichaelBillington]] 06:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
535137 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535136 +++$+++ 535136 +++$+++ 2006-06-29 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.151588100E09 +++$+++ No problem. Thanks very much. [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :No problem. Thanks very much. [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 06:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

535140 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535140 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-01 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.151801040E09 +++$+++ Off to Portugal, eh? Well, have a nice time, and be sure to bring some scannable souveniers! :) -- +++$+++ Off to Portugal, eh? Well, have a nice time, and be sure to bring some scannable souveniers! :) --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 17:44, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
535141 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535140 +++$+++ 535140 +++$+++ 2006-07-02 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.151852340E09 +++$+++ I landed in Seville yesterday, just after the Portugal-England match. I asked my brother to tape the match but the pilot ruined it by announcing the final result through the plane intercom. I'll stay here till tomorrow and then move on to the Algarve for 3 or 4 nights (ready for Portugal-France on Wednesday, he he). Sorry about your question above but can't really help here (I wouldn't know where to start searching for it). About the souvenirs, well I'll obviously have to buy now one of those \"weather-predicting roosters\" (a plastic chicken whose feathers change of colour according to atmospheric presure and humidity) :o) I also have my phone to take some photos, so even if the image resolution is not too high sometimes you get quite decent results (see [[Hibaldstow]]). Thanks, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :I landed in Seville yesterday, just after the Portugal-England match. I asked my brother to tape the match but the pilot ruined it by announcing the final result through the plane intercom. I'll stay here till tomorrow and then move on to the Algarve for 3 or 4 nights (ready for Portugal-France on Wednesday, he he). Sorry about your question above but can't really help here (I wouldn't know where to start searching for it). About the souvenirs, well I'll obviously have to buy now one of those "weather-predicting roosters" (a plastic chicken whose feathers change of colour according to atmospheric presure and humidity) :o) I also have my phone to take some photos, so even if the image resolution is not too high sometimes you get quite decent results (see [[Hibaldstow]]). Thanks, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 07:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

10853 +++$+++ JHH755 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10853 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-06 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.252224900E09 +++$+++ Very thank for your language edtion. Can we write as \"Jingdezhen Ceramics Co.,Ltd is a ...\"  instead of your new edtion of \"Jingdezhen Ceramics is a ....\". I understand that \"Jingdezhen ceramics\" is ceramic products, not a company's name. Can you tell me your understanding about it? Thanks!   +++$+++ Very thank for your language edtion. Can we write as "Jingdezhen Ceramics Co.,Ltd is a ..."  instead of your new edtion of "Jingdezhen Ceramics is a ....". I understand that "Jingdezhen ceramics" is ceramic products, not a company's name. Can you tell me your understanding about it? Thanks!  [[User:JHH755|JHH755]] ([[User talk:JHH755|talk]]) 01:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
10854 +++$+++ JHH755 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10853 +++$+++ 10853 +++$+++ 2009-09-06 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.252235460E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your explanation!     +++$+++ *Thank you for your explanation!    [[User:JHH755|JHH755]] ([[User talk:JHH755|talk]]) 04:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

535142 +++$+++ Harro5 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-03 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.151945100E09 +++$+++ Hey there Asterion! You were the first fellow admin I could spot on the recent changes list as being active right now. Could you [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Editingoprah_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs_.E2.80.A2_page_moves_.E2.80.A2_block_user_.E2.80.A2_block_log.29|respond to my WP:AN\/I request]]? Thanks in advance if you can.  +++$+++ Hey there Asterion! You were the first fellow admin I could spot on the recent changes list as being active right now. Could you [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Editingoprah_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs_.E2.80.A2_page_moves_.E2.80.A2_block_user_.E2.80.A2_block_log.29|respond to my WP:AN/I request]]? Thanks in advance if you can. [[User:Harro5|Harr]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">o</font>]]<b>[[User talk:Harro5|5]]</b> 09:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
535143 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535142 +++$+++ 535142 +++$+++ 2006-07-03 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.151945220E09 +++$+++ Sorry mate, I am not an admin yet. [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Sorry mate, I am not an admin yet. [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 09:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

10855 +++$+++ JHH755 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-06 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.252267920E09 +++$+++ I sent all your  revised versions of \u201cJingdezhen\u201d to my [[Hong Kong]]'s friend who had studied in the [[United Kingdom]] and earned a master's degree of economy. He also comments that your  language editions are very well and accurate. Thank you for your editions. I am from Shenzhen,PRC. I feel my English is very non-standard and should learn correct English from you to continue the entry edition of Jingdezhen.Can you tell me if English is your mother tongue and could you frequently use Chinese Writing in wikipedia? Thank you!   +++$+++ I sent all your  revised versions of “Jingdezhen” to my [[Hong Kong]]'s friend who had studied in the [[United Kingdom]] and earned a master's degree of economy. He also comments that your  language editions are very well and accurate. Thank you for your editions. I am from Shenzhen,PRC. I feel my English is very non-standard and should learn correct English from you to continue the entry edition of Jingdezhen.Can you tell me if English is your mother tongue and could you frequently use Chinese Writing in wikipedia? Thank you!  [[User:JHH755|JHH755]] ([[User talk:JHH755|talk]]) 13:12, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
10856 +++$+++ JHH755 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10855 +++$+++ 10855 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.252323180E09 +++$+++ Carefully studied your message. I feel that you are a very educated person, and  your suggestion on improving English is OK. Thank you!  +++$+++ *Carefully studied your message. I feel that you are a very educated person, and  your suggestion on improving English is OK. Thank you! [[User:JHH755|JHH755]] ([[User talk:JHH755|talk]]) 04:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

535144 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535144 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-08 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.152376440E09 +++$+++ I don't think we're getting anywhere with the Kosovo introduction, particularly since Ferick has openly rejected [[WP:NPOV]] and is now refusing to discuss sources. Accordingly, I've submitted a [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation#Kosovo introduction|request for mediation]]. Please indicate on that page whether you consent to having the matter mediated. --  +++$+++ I don't think we're getting anywhere with the Kosovo introduction, particularly since Ferick has openly rejected [[WP:NPOV]] and is now refusing to discuss sources. Accordingly, I've submitted a [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation#Kosovo introduction|request for mediation]]. Please indicate on that page whether you consent to having the matter mediated. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] 09:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
535145 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535144 +++$+++ 535144 +++$+++ 2006-07-08 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.152376680E09 +++$+++ I have no problem with that. I will point that out in the page. Please note that this problem with Ferick is also leaking to a number of related articles too. Regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :I have no problem with that. I will point that out in the page. Please note that this problem with Ferick is also leaking to a number of related articles too. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 09:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

10857 +++$+++ JHH755 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-08 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.252421880E09 +++$+++ so I wrote \"In the city's urban there are 47 high schools....\". In your edition I explain the  word \"proper\"  as  \"some things are right\". Maybe my explaination is wrong, could you explain  what you done. '''The second''': your edtion of \"There are also 74...\", can we add \"in the city\" or \" in Jingdezhen\" after the sentence like \"There are also 74... in the city\".  By the way, could you leave me a message in [[Skype]] if you visit Shenzhen City again in the future, I want to present you a small Jingdezhen's porcelain , I believe you will love it. Best regards!   +++$+++ so I wrote "In the city's urban there are 47 high schools....". In your edition I explain the  word "proper"  as  "some things are right". Maybe my explaination is wrong, could you explain  what you done. '''The second''': your edtion of "There are also 74...", can we add "in the city" or " in Jingdezhen" after the sentence like "There are also 74... in the city".  By the way, could you leave me a message in [[Skype]] if you visit Shenzhen City again in the future, I want to present you a small Jingdezhen's porcelain , I believe you will love it. Best regards!  [[User:JHH755|JHH755]] ([[User talk:JHH755|talk]]) 07:58, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
10858 +++$+++ 119.137.39.245 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10857 +++$+++ 10857 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.252477380E09 +++$+++ Studied, thank you![[Special:Contributions\/119.137.39.245|119.137.39.245]] ( +++$+++ * Studied, thank you![[Special:Contributions/119.137.39.245|119.137.39.245]] ([[User talk:119.137.39.245|talk]]) 23:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

273002 +++$+++ Mike1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-15 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.160972280E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I award you this barnstar for obvious reasons. Thanks a lot! - <strong> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you this barnstar for obvious reasons. Thanks a lot! - <strong>[[User:Mike1|Mike]] | [[User talk:Mike1|Talk]]</strong> 21:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
273003 +++$+++ Mike1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273002 +++$+++ 273002 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.160972760E09 +++$+++ Well deserved. Hopefully the default title will be changed to this -- currently it's the working ''man's'' barnstar. - <strong> +++$+++ :Well deserved. Hopefully the default title will be changed to this -- currently it's the working ''man's'' barnstar. - <strong>[[User:Mike1|Mike]] | [[User talk:Mike1|Talk]]</strong> 21:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

535147 +++$+++ Garcilaso +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-11 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.152637500E09 +++$+++ No obstante, difiero en el cambio de las im\xe1genes en el art\xedculo Mud\xe9jar. Por mucho que ame Sevilla, no creo correcto que los dos ejemplos de un estilo que se desarroll\xf3 de forma tan importante en ciudades como Teruel o Toledo, sean de una misma ciudad. La iglesia cuya imagen pones es de menor importancia que la Seo de Zaragoza o las iglesias de Sahag\xfan, y dan una visi\xf3n mucho m\xe1s limitada localmente del estilo que si junto al Alc\xe1zar estuviese la imagen de una torre toledana o aragonesa, por poner dos ejemplos. \xa1Un saludo!-- +++$+++ No obstante, difiero en el cambio de las imágenes en el artículo Mudéjar. Por mucho que ame Sevilla, no creo correcto que los dos ejemplos de un estilo que se desarrolló de forma tan importante en ciudades como Teruel o Toledo, sean de una misma ciudad. La iglesia cuya imagen pones es de menor importancia que la Seo de Zaragoza o las iglesias de Sahagún, y dan una visión mucho más limitada localmente del estilo que si junto al Alcázar estuviese la imagen de una torre toledana o aragonesa, por poner dos ejemplos. ¡Un saludo!--[[User:Garcilaso|Garcilaso]] 10:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
535148 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535147 +++$+++ 535147 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.152666900E09 +++$+++ Hola Garcilaso, encantado de conocerte. No estoy seguro de ser lo valiente como para poder crear art\xedculos desde cero, pero podr\xeda ayudar a traducir los de la wikipedia en espa\xf1ol. Respecto a lo de las fotos, no tengo ning\xfan problema. Simplemente pens\xe9 que una foto de exteriores llamar\xeda m\xe1s la atenci\xf3n al lector. Por otro lado la iglesia de Sevilla no resulta tan buen ejemplo, pues aunque se trata de una foto de exterior, la torre en s\xed es pre-mudejar (parte de una antigua mezquita). Acabo de volver de vacaciones de Sevilla y me siento un poco mal por no haber hecho m\xe1s fotos o traerme fotos antiguas para escanear en mi casa. Volviendo a lo de [[Mudejar]], s\xedrvete cambiarlas de sitio o si tienes o encuentras alguna otra de Commons o es.wiki, a\xf1adirla si eso. No me tienes que pedir permiso, hombre. \xbfQu\xe9 opinas del cambio de contenido? No me parec\xeda correcto decir que el estilo se relaciona principalmente con Toledo, pues hasta cierto punto, existen focos diferentes (Sahag\xfan, por ejemplo). Saludos, --[[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Hola Garcilaso, encantado de conocerte. No estoy seguro de ser lo valiente como para poder crear artículos desde cero, pero podría ayudar a traducir los de la wikipedia en español. Respecto a lo de las fotos, no tengo ningún problema. Simplemente pensé que una foto de exteriores llamaría más la atención al lector. Por otro lado la iglesia de Sevilla no resulta tan buen ejemplo, pues aunque se trata de una foto de exterior, la torre en sí es pre-mudejar (parte de una antigua mezquita). Acabo de volver de vacaciones de Sevilla y me siento un poco mal por no haber hecho más fotos o traerme fotos antiguas para escanear en mi casa. Volviendo a lo de [[Mudejar]], sírvete cambiarlas de sitio o si tienes o encuentras alguna otra de Commons o es.wiki, añadirla si eso. No me tienes que pedir permiso, hombre. ¿Qué opinas del cambio de contenido? No me parecía correcto decir que el estilo se relaciona principalmente con Toledo, pues hasta cierto punto, existen focos diferentes (Sahagún, por ejemplo). Saludos, --[[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 18:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
535149 +++$+++ Garcilaso +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535147 +++$+++ 535148 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.153099260E09 +++$+++ \xa1Hola, Asterion! Siento la tardanza en contestar, pero no ca\xed en que me ibas a contestar aqu\xed. Bueno, varias cosas. Las fotos de Mud\xe9jar: ya he ampliado un poquito y metido un artesonado, que es bastante significativo del tema. Respecto a Sahag\xfan y Toledo, no s\xf3lo tienes raz\xf3n sino que me has hecho un favor. Cuando estudi\xe9 el tema, me dijeron que la primera obra mud\xe9jar era el Cristo de la Luz, y leyendo tu edici\xf3n me lo cuestion\xe9 y volv\xed a repasarme la cronolog\xeda. Efectivamente, las iglesias de Sahag\xfan son anteriores y  me parece correct\xedsimo destacarlo. No obstante, creo que Toledo tambi\xe9n deber\xeda de quedar distinguido en el art\xedculo por la profusi\xf3n de iglesias mud\xe9jares en su casco y por ostentar un \"estilo\" propio. Otra cosa: acabo de proponer para [[Wikipedia: Collaboration of the week]] el art\xedculo [[Spanish architecture]], que no existe todav\xeda. Precisamente por ese miedo que comparto contigo de hacer un art\xedculo as\xed, tan gordo, del tir\xf3n. Si crees que podr\xedas echar una mano, te agradecer\xeda que votases en [[WP:CotW]]. Es una forma de que editores angloparlantes se interesen en el tema y colaboren. Un saludo, y \xa1hasta pronto!-- +++$+++ ::¡Hola, Asterion! Siento la tardanza en contestar, pero no caí en que me ibas a contestar aquí. Bueno, varias cosas. Las fotos de Mudéjar: ya he ampliado un poquito y metido un artesonado, que es bastante significativo del tema. Respecto a Sahagún y Toledo, no sólo tienes razón sino que me has hecho un favor. Cuando estudié el tema, me dijeron que la primera obra mudéjar era el Cristo de la Luz, y leyendo tu edición me lo cuestioné y volví a repasarme la cronología. Efectivamente, las iglesias de Sahagún son anteriores y  me parece correctísimo destacarlo. No obstante, creo que Toledo también debería de quedar distinguido en el artículo por la profusión de iglesias mudéjares en su casco y por ostentar un "estilo" propio. Otra cosa: acabo de proponer para [[Wikipedia: Collaboration of the week]] el artículo [[Spanish architecture]], que no existe todavía. Precisamente por ese miedo que comparto contigo de hacer un artículo así, tan gordo, del tirón. Si crees que podrías echar una mano, te agradecería que votases en [[WP:CotW]]. Es una forma de que editores angloparlantes se interesen en el tema y colaboren. Un saludo, y ¡hasta pronto!--[[User:Garcilaso|Garcilaso]] 18:21, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

10860 +++$+++ Notpietru +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-04 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.252069080E09 +++$+++ Ref fixed, replaced \"folk culture\" with \"customs\" but neither option is really accurate. They are all equally manifestations of local culture, inclusive of literature, sport, cuisine, weddings, festivals etc.  +++$+++ Ref fixed, replaced "folk culture" with "customs" but neither option is really accurate. They are all equally manifestations of local culture, inclusive of literature, sport, cuisine, weddings, festivals etc. [[User:Notpietru|Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση]] ([[User talk:Notpietru|talk]]) 05:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
10861 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10860 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-06 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.252231500E09 +++$+++ I agree that so far we have not come up with a solution that dominates all other possible solutions. Folk customs works, but actually, Customs alone could work. As it is, I think the organization of the whole culture section is looking pretty good. +++$+++ ::I agree that so far we have not come up with a solution that dominates all other possible solutions. Folk customs works, but actually, Customs alone could work. As it is, I think the organization of the whole culture section is looking pretty good.[[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 03:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

535150 +++$+++ Burgas00 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-11 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.152668580E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Burgas00|Burgas00]] 18:43, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
535151 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535150 +++$+++ 535150 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.152669900E09 +++$+++ Pienso que lo mejor seria hacer lo de Request for Comments para el art\xedculo en s\xed. De esta manera puedes subrayar a lo que te refieres (p.ej., OCDE). Asi Gibnews tiene la oportunidad de explicar porque esta en desacuerdo con las fuentes citadas. La \xfanica raz\xf3n ser\xeda si fueran no verificables o si resultaran en ''undue weight'', pero no creo que sea el caso. No entiendo el porqu\xe9 no deber\xedan mencionarse en el art\xedculo, en ese sentido. Siento lo de tus vacaciones :( [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Pienso que lo mejor seria hacer lo de Request for Comments para el artículo en sí. De esta manera puedes subrayar a lo que te refieres (p.ej., OCDE). Asi Gibnews tiene la oportunidad de explicar porque esta en desacuerdo con las fuentes citadas. La única razón sería si fueran no verificables o si resultaran en ''undue weight'', pero no creo que sea el caso. No entiendo el porqué no deberían mencionarse en el artículo, en ese sentido. Siento lo de tus vacaciones :( [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 19:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

273007 +++$+++ Physicq210 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273007 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-17 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.161083220E09 +++$+++ |Thank you very much for your support in my [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Physicq210|RfA]], which passed on October 17, 2006 with a tally of '''53\/6\/0'''. I am equally elated and humbled by my new capacity as administrator of Wikipedia, and I send my heartfelt thanks for your unflinching support. If you need me for anything, just ask me! With gratitude, <sup>[[User talk:Physicq210|210]]<\/sup>''' +++$+++ |Thank you very much for your support in my [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Physicq210|RfA]], which passed on October 17, 2006 with a tally of '''53/6/0'''. I am equally elated and humbled by my new capacity as administrator of Wikipedia, and I send my heartfelt thanks for your unflinching support. If you need me for anything, just ask me! With gratitude, <sup>[[User talk:Physicq210|210]]</sup>'''[[User:Physicq210|<font color="#0000C0">physicq</font>]]''' (''[[Special:Contributions/Physicq210|<font color="#0000C0">c</font>]]'') 04:07, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
273008 +++$+++ Deon555 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273007 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.161083340E09 +++$+++ Lol, it must be good when Trolls know my name :) &mdash; [[User:Deon555|D]]<font color=\"green\">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]<\/font>[[User:Deon555|on555]]<sup><font color=\"purple\">[[User_talk:Deon555|'''talk''']]<\/font><\/sup><sub> +++$+++ :::Lol, it must be good when Trolls know my name :) &mdash; [[User:Deon555|D]]<font color="green">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User:Deon555|on555]]<sup><font color="purple">[[User_talk:Deon555|'''talk''']]</font></sup><sub>[[User:Deon555/ER|Review]]</sub> 04:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

273009 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273009 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-17 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.161101100E09 +++$+++ I'm awfully sorry to bother you when you're busy, but I wondered if you might chip in here and try to help me convince this user that humorous is the right spelling, seeing you were involved in the discussion. I will ask Congirl too; maybe the user will believe an Australian on an Australian subject! Don't worry if you have more important things to do. -- +++$+++ I'm awfully sorry to bother you when you're busy, but I wondered if you might chip in here and try to help me convince this user that humorous is the right spelling, seeing you were involved in the discussion. I will ask Congirl too; maybe the user will believe an Australian on an Australian subject! Don't worry if you have more important things to do. --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 09:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
273010 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273009 +++$+++ 273009 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.161105840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that very full and well-researched answer. I have changed the spelling again. Appreciate it. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for that very full and well-researched answer. I have changed the spelling again. Appreciate it. --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 10:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

535154 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-11 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.152679800E09 +++$+++ Pronounciation for Spanish names must be given in standard Spanish, which is understood as the unmarked pronunciation, not in regional variations: i.e. Sevilla is not down as \/se\xb7bi\u02d0\xb7\u029da\/ although this is the local pronunciation (instead \/se\xb7bi\u02d0\xb7\u028ea\/). I have no intention on edit-warring on this, I just want you to understand that this is not a matter of respecting local sensibilities but writing an encyclopedia. By the same rule, most -if not all- the placenames in Latin America containing \"za\", \"ce\", \"ci\", \"zo\" or \"zu\" would be transcribed as \/sa\/, \/se\/ and so on, because the local [[seseo]]. Regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ Pronounciation for Spanish names must be given in standard Spanish, which is understood as the unmarked pronunciation, not in regional variations: i.e. Sevilla is not down as /se·biː·ʝa/ although this is the local pronunciation (instead /se·biː·ʎa/). I have no intention on edit-warring on this, I just want you to understand that this is not a matter of respecting local sensibilities but writing an encyclopedia. By the same rule, most -if not all- the placenames in Latin America containing "za", "ce", "ci", "zo" or "zu" would be transcribed as /sa/, /se/ and so on, because the local [[seseo]]. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 21:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
535155 +++$+++ Joanot +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535154 +++$+++ 535154 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.152711780E09 +++$+++ First of all, thanks because you write me a message. Answering it, you can see that in the article it mentions \"Castilian Spanish\", so at it's meaning a specific variation of Spanish used there, I think it's possible to explain how is the pronunciation of the name of the city. Anyway, I'm agree with you that the Spanish words should be in stantard pronunciation for nouns, adjectives, etc... but I think that the name of a city should be recommended to give the local form. If sevillans really pronounces their city as \/se\xb7bi\u02d0\xb7\u029da\/, I think it should written in the article, and the same way for Latin American toponyms. Local forms of a language in some cases should be respected and protected instead of being banned.-- +++$+++ : First of all, thanks because you write me a message. Answering it, you can see that in the article it mentions "Castilian Spanish", so at it's meaning a specific variation of Spanish used there, I think it's possible to explain how is the pronunciation of the name of the city. Anyway, I'm agree with you that the Spanish words should be in stantard pronunciation for nouns, adjectives, etc... but I think that the name of a city should be recommended to give the local form. If sevillans really pronounces their city as /se·biː·ʝa/, I think it should written in the article, and the same way for Latin American toponyms. Local forms of a language in some cases should be respected and protected instead of being banned.--[[User:Joanot|Joanot Martorell]] <font size="+2">[[User_talk:Joanot|&#9993;]]</font> 06:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

273011 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-17 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.161142440E09 +++$+++ Is it ok for people on English Wikipedia to speak in a different language about other User's and topics? (two user's are talking about me and certain articles, and I dont think its ok for them to be doing this) +++$+++ Is it ok for people on English Wikipedia to speak in a different language about other User's and topics? (two user's are talking about me and certain articles, and I dont think its ok for them to be doing this)[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 20:34, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
273012 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273011 +++$+++ 273011 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.161144180E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMardavich&diff=81974282&oldid=81522878] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGrandmaster&diff=81959948&oldid=81736383]. +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMardavich&diff=81974282&oldid=81522878] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGrandmaster&diff=81959948&oldid=81736383].[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 21:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

10868 +++$+++ PFHLai +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10868 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-27 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.254102480E09 +++$+++ Hi. I've nominated [[HMS Owen Glendower]], an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the [[Main Page]] as part of [[Wikipedia:Did you know]].  You can see the hook for the article [[Template talk:Did you know#HMS Owen Glendower|here]], where you can improve it if you see fit.  Please feel free to propose new hooks, if you like.  If you can put in more refs & footnotes to the article, that would be great. Thanks. Happy editing. Cheers! -- +++$+++ Hi. I've nominated [[HMS Owen Glendower]], an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the [[Main Page]] as part of [[Wikipedia:Did you know]].  You can see the hook for the article [[Template talk:Did you know#HMS Owen Glendower|here]], where you can improve it if you see fit.  Please feel free to propose new hooks, if you like.  If you can put in more refs & footnotes to the article, that would be great. Thanks. Happy editing. Cheers! --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 18:48, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
10869 +++$+++ PFHLai +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10868 +++$+++ 10868 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.254103200E09 +++$+++ You're welcome, Acad Ronin.  Thank you for adding the refs.  More information about the DYK nomination process can be found [[T:TDYK#Instructions|here]].  Hope this helps.  You have been doing good work in Wikipedia.  Please be encouraged to nominate your next wikicontribution for DYK. Happy editing. Take care. -- +++$+++ : You're welcome, Acad Ronin.  Thank you for adding the refs.  More information about the DYK nomination process can be found [[T:TDYK#Instructions|here]].  Hope this helps.  You have been doing good work in Wikipedia.  Please be encouraged to nominate your next wikicontribution for DYK. Happy editing. Take care. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 19:00, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
10870 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10868 +++$+++ 10869 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.254105360E09 +++$+++ Am having trouble finding my source's source for the two items that really require sources, particularly the DYK one, so hold off on it for now. My source is a website by a serious researcher of the period, but one who unfortunately does not cite his sources. Will continue to try and find printed source. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Am having trouble finding my source's source for the two items that really require sources, particularly the DYK one, so hold off on it for now. My source is a website by a serious researcher of the period, but one who unfortunately does not cite his sources. Will continue to try and find printed source. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 19:36, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
10871 +++$+++ PFHLai +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10868 +++$+++ 10870 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.254139620E09 +++$+++ It looks like you've already put in quite a few footnotes, and the ref to support the DYK hook is in.  Thank you so much.  If possible, please add a few more.  DYK clerks often ask for at least a footnote in every single paragraph after the introduction.  I'm usually not around during the work week, so I won't be able to do much for the time being.  When you think you've added enough footnotes and refs to the article, you might want to mention this on [[T:TDYK#HMS Owen Glendower]].  Happy editing.  Cheers! -- +++$+++ :::  It looks like you've already put in quite a few footnotes, and the ref to support the DYK hook is in.  Thank you so much.  If possible, please add a few more.  DYK clerks often ask for at least a footnote in every single paragraph after the introduction.  I'm usually not around during the work week, so I won't be able to do much for the time being.  When you think you've added enough footnotes and refs to the article, you might want to mention this on [[T:TDYK#HMS Owen Glendower]].  Happy editing.  Cheers! --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 05:07, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

569790 +++$+++ Gary Kirk +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.176226560E09 +++$+++ I added my name to the [[Wikipedia:Admin coaching\/Requests|requests page]] and the main page suggested I contact a free coach if I wanted to get started (you know all that sure). So I just chose you as a) you were top of the list and b) you voted in my [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Gary Kirk|last RfA]]. Let me know if you would mind coaching me :). <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ I added my name to the [[Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests|requests page]] and the main page suggested I contact a free coach if I wanted to get started (you know all that sure). So I just chose you as a) you were top of the list and b) you voted in my [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gary Kirk|last RfA]]. Let me know if you would mind coaching me :). <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Gary Kirk|<font color="#7b68ee">'''Gary Kirk'''</font>]] [[User talk:Gary Kirk|<font color="#7b68ee"><small>[Talk]</small></font>]]</span> 10:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
569791 +++$+++ Gary Kirk +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569790 +++$+++ 569790 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 09:39:00 +++$+++ 1.176827940E09 +++$+++ Oops. I see you've had quite a few requests above ^^, so I'll just wait :) <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Oops. I see you've had quite a few requests above ^^, so I'll just wait :) <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Gary Kirk|<font color="#7b68ee">'''Gary Kirk'''</font>]] [[User talk:Gary Kirk|<font color="#7b68ee"><small>[Talk]</small></font>]]</span> 09:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
569792 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569790 +++$+++ 569790 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.176249420E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's fine!  I'm sure that  you can come up with your own colour choices and design influences through looking at the userpages of other editors.  Mine is tailored for what I want to do at the moment.  No doubt it will change in time as yours will do too.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Yes, that's fine!  I'm sure that  you can come up with your own colour choices and design influences through looking at the userpages of other editors.  Mine is tailored for what I want to do at the moment.  No doubt it will change in time as yours will do too.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 16:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

535158 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535158 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-15 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.153013520E09 +++$+++ Excellent work on this article! --  +++$+++ Excellent work on this article! -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] 18:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
535159 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535158 +++$+++ 535158 +++$+++ 2006-07-15 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.153013640E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Thank you very much, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 18:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

535161 +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-20 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.153393260E09 +++$+++ A page you listed for tranlsation, [[Fusagasug\xe1]], has been translated into English by me, as well as [[User:Fabricationary|Fabricationary]] and [[User:Fsotrain09|Fsotrain09]]. The article is still in poor shape. However, I will tranlsate the corresponding Spanish article completely as soon as I'm done with my current project. I'll let you know when I've finished, It might not be for a few days. Cheers, [[User:RyanGerbil10|RyanG]][[User:RyanGerbil10\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ A page you listed for tranlsation, [[Fusagasugá]], has been translated into English by me, as well as [[User:Fabricationary|Fabricationary]] and [[User:Fsotrain09|Fsotrain09]]. The article is still in poor shape. However, I will tranlsate the corresponding Spanish article completely as soon as I'm done with my current project. I'll let you know when I've finished, It might not be for a few days. Cheers, [[User:RyanGerbil10|RyanG]][[User:RyanGerbil10/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:RyanGerbil10|rbil10]] [[User_talk:RyanGerbil10|(Drop on in!)]] 04:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
535162 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535161 +++$+++ 535161 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.153582080E09 +++$+++ Thanks, you have done a good job. I will proofread it later on (I am a native speaker of Spanish). --[[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Thanks, you have done a good job. I will proofread it later on (I am a native speaker of Spanish). --[[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 08:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

535163 +++$+++ RadioKirk +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-20 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.153451520E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Nookdog&diff=prev&oldid=64901174 See here] for proof; plus, I received an e-mail from this person asking for an IP unblock that was identical to a previous e-mail by Nookdog. <tt style=\"color:#161;\">RadioKirk<small> ( +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nookdog&diff=prev&oldid=64901174 See here] for proof; plus, I received an e-mail from this person asking for an IP unblock that was identical to a previous e-mail by Nookdog. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 20:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
535164 +++$+++ RadioKirk +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535163 +++$+++ 535163 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.153527420E09 +++$+++ I might be willing to unblock Ferick if indeed this is a different person (bear in mind, I got a nearly identical e-mail from the two at different times asking for unblocks, and Ferick has never responded to my request for his IP), but I've blocked Nookdog's IP and, if Ferick edits from there, he'll still be blocked. As for Nookdog, there is confirmation of massive sockpuppetry from that IP; he gets no more chances per exhaustion of the community's patience. <tt style=\"color:#161;\">RadioKirk<small> ( +++$+++ :I might be willing to unblock Ferick if indeed this is a different person (bear in mind, I got a nearly identical e-mail from the two at different times asking for unblocks, and Ferick has never responded to my request for his IP), but I've blocked Nookdog's IP and, if Ferick edits from there, he'll still be blocked. As for Nookdog, there is confirmation of massive sockpuppetry from that IP; he gets no more chances per exhaustion of the community's patience. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 17:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
535165 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535163 +++$+++ 535164 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.153530000E09 +++$+++ RadioKirk, I think the evidence is convincing... nonetheless I'm still puzzled by the fact that Nookdog and Ferick (a) edited in completely different areas, with no overlap that I can see, and (b) the two have completely different styles of writing. The only thing that I can think of that might explain this would be one person creating multiple personas to edit on different topics, though that doesn't satisfactorily explain the totally different writing styles. --  +++$+++ ::RadioKirk, I think the evidence is convincing... nonetheless I'm still puzzled by the fact that Nookdog and Ferick (a) edited in completely different areas, with no overlap that I can see, and (b) the two have completely different styles of writing. The only thing that I can think of that might explain this would be one person creating multiple personas to edit on different topics, though that doesn't satisfactorily explain the totally different writing styles. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] 18:00, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
535166 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535163 +++$+++ 535165 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.153535100E09 +++$+++ You may indeed be right, ChrisO. I have nothing to say about Nookdog as he has gone too far indeed. I just found the link to Ferick kind of bizarre. Ferick mentioned in [[Talk:Kosovo]] he got autoblocked before. He also edited from IP  there (ISP: Mindspring). Not sure if that helps. Thanks, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::You may indeed be right, ChrisO. I have nothing to say about Nookdog as he has gone too far indeed. I just found the link to Ferick kind of bizarre. Ferick mentioned in [[Talk:Kosovo]] he got autoblocked before. He also edited from IP  there (ISP: Mindspring). Not sure if that helps. Thanks, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 19:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
535167 +++$+++ RadioKirk +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535163 +++$+++ 535166 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.153574880E09 +++$+++ You may need to check the AN\/I archives, but checkuser has clearly established [[User:]] as a sock farm and it is not to be unblocked without extraordinary evidence proving its use as a vandal farm has stopped. <tt style=\"color:#161;\">RadioKirk<small> ( +++$+++ ::::You may need to check the AN/I archives, but checkuser has clearly established [[User:]] as a sock farm and it is not to be unblocked without extraordinary evidence proving its use as a vandal farm has stopped. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 06:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
535168 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535163 +++$+++ 535167 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.153576740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your patience. I didn't know Ferick had used that IP. [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::::Thanks for your patience. I didn't know Ferick had used that IP. [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 06:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
535169 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535163 +++$+++ 535163 +++$+++ 2006-07-24 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.153786560E09 +++$+++ Hi Ferick, I will contact RadioKirk again and request a CheckUser on your behalf to [[User:Essjay]] if you want to clear your name. Please note that this may not prove conclusive and it is up to the admins to decide on the block. If there is no connection between your account and the IP , you are pretty much in the clear. Regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Hi Ferick, I will contact RadioKirk again and request a CheckUser on your behalf to [[User:Essjay]] if you want to clear your name. Please note that this may not prove conclusive and it is up to the admins to decide on the block. If there is no connection between your account and the IP , you are pretty much in the clear. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 17:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
535170 +++$+++ RadioKirk +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535163 +++$+++ 535169 +++$+++ 2006-07-24 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.153787880E09 +++$+++ Some misspelling issues, that's about it (also,  resolves either to PA or MA, depending on the whois service, while  resolves to Kansas City, MO, and neither appears to be a proxy, which argues for Ferick). I've requested an e-mail to use for further review, but I have yet to receive one. <tt style=\"color:#161;\">RadioKirk<small> ( +++$+++ ::Some misspelling issues, that's about it (also,  resolves either to PA or MA, depending on the whois service, while  resolves to Kansas City, MO, and neither appears to be a proxy, which argues for Ferick). I've requested an e-mail to use for further review, but I have yet to receive one. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 17:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

10876 +++$+++ Gibmetal77 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10876 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-22 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.256273460E09 +++$+++ I don't have any photos of the bank but I'll try to take a shot of it next time I'm in town. I'm thinking of purchasing the book \"''The Smallest Bank in the World''\" and it might have some old photos I could scan. Regards, -- +++$+++ I don't have any photos of the bank but I'll try to take a shot of it next time I'm in town. I'm thinking of purchasing the book "''The Smallest Bank in the World''" and it might have some old photos I could scan. Regards, --[[User:Gibmetal77|<span style="margin:0;text-align:left;color:#FF7F00;font-size:80%;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold;padding:0.2em 0.4em">Gibmetal 77</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Gibmetal77|<font color="#99 32 CC">talk</font>]]</sup> 21:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
10877 +++$+++ Gibmetal77 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10876 +++$+++ 10876 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.256284200E09 +++$+++ By the way what's your connection with Gib? -- +++$+++ :By the way what's your connection with Gib? --[[User:Gibmetal77|<span style="margin:0;text-align:left;color:#FF7F00;font-size:80%;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold;padding:0.2em 0.4em">Gibmetal 77</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Gibmetal77|<font color="#99 32 CC">talk</font>]]</sup> 00:50, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
10878 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10876 +++$+++ 10877 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.256284740E09 +++$+++ Little more than a one-day visit and a nostalgia for the Empire. Actually, I ended up doing a couple of things about Gib as a consequence of an interest in bank history (hence [[Banco Galliano]]) and an interest in things military. I visited [[Fort Rinella]] during a couple of days' vacation following a conference in Malta, and that got me writing about the fort and the 100-ton guns, which led to Napier of Magdalla Battery. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Little more than a one-day visit and a nostalgia for the Empire. Actually, I ended up doing a couple of things about Gib as a consequence of an interest in bank history (hence [[Banco Galliano]]) and an interest in things military. I visited [[Fort Rinella]] during a couple of days' vacation following a conference in Malta, and that got me writing about the fort and the 100-ton guns, which led to Napier of Magdalla Battery. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 00:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
10879 +++$+++ Gibmetal77 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10876 +++$+++ 10878 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.256285940E09 +++$+++ An article on the [[Fortifications of Gibraltar]] is on my [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gibraltar\/to do|to do list]], though when I'll get round to it is another thing... I'll keep that photo in mind too. Regards, -- +++$+++ :::An article on the [[Fortifications of Gibraltar]] is on my [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gibraltar/to do|to do list]], though when I'll get round to it is another thing... I'll keep that photo in mind too. Regards, --[[User:Gibmetal77|<span style="margin:0;text-align:left;color:#FF7F00;font-size:80%;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold;padding:0.2em 0.4em">Gibmetal 77</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Gibmetal77|<font color="#99 32 CC">talk</font>]]</sup> 01:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

482410 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482410 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-02 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.172876640E09 +++$+++ OK, here's a new one whose sole purpose seems to be to screw around with things. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Ballplayer22]  +++$+++ OK, here's a new one whose sole purpose seems to be to screw around with things. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ballplayer22] [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 15:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
482411 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482410 +++$+++ 482410 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.172879520E09 +++$+++ Yep, looks about right.  It's gone.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Yep, looks about right.  It's gone.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 15:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
482412 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482410 +++$+++ 482411 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.172880660E09 +++$+++ ''Bueno.''  +++$+++ ::''Bueno.'' [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 16:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

273023 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-21 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.161500160E09 +++$+++ The article is called [[The Lighthorsemen]].  Since its deletion it was remade as a stub.  Could you retrieve the original and put it under user:Culverin\/the lighthorsemen, or something under my username so I can improve on it and hopefully resubmit it.  Thanks ''' +++$+++ The article is called [[The Lighthorsemen]].  Since its deletion it was remade as a stub.  Could you retrieve the original and put it under user:Culverin/the lighthorsemen, or something under my username so I can improve on it and hopefully resubmit it.  Thanks '''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 23:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
273024 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273023 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-22 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.161511320E09 +++$+++ Most of the article was made from oringinal research.  Not any site. ''' +++$+++ ::Most of the article was made from oringinal research.  Not any site. '''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 03:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

10883 +++$+++ Kablammo +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-12 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.258061820E09 +++$+++ Hello AR.  I came across a couple of your well-done articles on RN vessels.  [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ships\/Archive_13#Proposal_to_deprecate_.22Tons_Burthen.22_in_infobox_and_hunt_down_metric_convertions_of_Tonnage|This discussion]] may be of interest to you, as it explains the difference between tons burthen and weight.  The references and external links at [[Builder's Old Measurement]] also are helpful.  Burthen is really an approximation of capacity, not of displacement in long tons.  Regards,   +++$+++ Hello AR.  I came across a couple of your well-done articles on RN vessels.  [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ships/Archive_13#Proposal_to_deprecate_.22Tons_Burthen.22_in_infobox_and_hunt_down_metric_convertions_of_Tonnage|This discussion]] may be of interest to you, as it explains the difference between tons burthen and weight.  The references and external links at [[Builder's Old Measurement]] also are helpful.  Burthen is really an approximation of capacity, not of displacement in long tons.  Regards,  [[User:Kablammo|Kablammo]] ([[User talk:Kablammo|talk]]) 13:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
10884 +++$+++ Kablammo +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10883 +++$+++ 10883 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.258064340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply.  My only suggestion is to not link long tons or use conversions, as they are inaccurate.  Every so often I go through and add <nowiki>[[Builder's Old Measurement|bm]]<\/nowiki> to the figure, which renders thus:  [[Builder's Old Measurement|bm]].  That seems to be the practice followed by others.   +++$+++ :Thanks for the reply.  My only suggestion is to not link long tons or use conversions, as they are inaccurate.  Every so often I go through and add <nowiki>[[Builder's Old Measurement|bm]]</nowiki> to the figure, which renders thus:  [[Builder's Old Measurement|bm]].  That seems to be the practice followed by others.  [[User:Kablammo|Kablammo]] ([[User talk:Kablammo|talk]]) 14:19, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
10885 +++$+++ Rif Winfield +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10883 +++$+++ 10884 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.260840480E09 +++$+++ Displacement was almost never used for warships until the middle of the 19th century, and during the Age of Sail almost every tonnage figure quoted in contemporary sources (or copies into more modern secondary sources) is actually the tons burthen (or builder's measurement), for which \"bm\" is the recognised abbreviation. See the comments on my user talk page for the alterations in the means of calculating the BM tonnage. As is stated in various pages, burthen is a measurement of capacity, never of weight\/displacement.  +++$+++ ::Displacement was almost never used for warships until the middle of the 19th century, and during the Age of Sail almost every tonnage figure quoted in contemporary sources (or copies into more modern secondary sources) is actually the tons burthen (or builder's measurement), for which "bm" is the recognised abbreviation. See the comments on my user talk page for the alterations in the means of calculating the BM tonnage. As is stated in various pages, burthen is a measurement of capacity, never of weight/displacement. [[User:Rif Winfield|Rif Winfield]] ([[User talk:Rif Winfield|talk]]) 17:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

535173 +++$+++  +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Gibraltarian has made (or has attempted to make) an appeal - see Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee. It seems he's still unrepentent even in his appeal statement. 23:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ Gibraltarian has made (or has attempted to make) an appeal - see Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee. It seems he's still unrepentent even in his appeal statement. 23:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
535174 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535173 +++$+++ 535173 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.153550160E09 +++$+++ So unrepentant that he just blanked my talk page. That's the spirit! [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :So unrepentant that he just blanked my talk page. That's the spirit! [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 23:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

10886 +++$+++ PFHLai +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10886 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-15 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.258353840E09 +++$+++ |} [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 19:21, 15 November 2009 (UTC) &  +++$+++ |} [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 19:21, 15 November 2009 (UTC) & [[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 22:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
10887 +++$+++ PFHLai +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10886 +++$+++ 10886 +++$+++ 2009-11-16 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.258370880E09 +++$+++ You're welcome, Acad Ronin. Thank ''you'' for the nice articles. Happy editing. Cheers! -- +++$+++ :You're welcome, Acad Ronin. Thank ''you'' for the nice articles. Happy editing. Cheers! --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 03:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

535175 +++$+++ Ricky81682 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535175 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-24 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.153789560E09 +++$+++ Just a quick question.  Is [[User:Hipi Zhdripi]] always this interesting to deal with? --  +++$+++ Just a quick question.  Is [[User:Hipi Zhdripi]] always this interesting to deal with? -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 18:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
535176 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535175 +++$+++ 535175 +++$+++ 2006-07-24 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.153794540E09 +++$+++ I can assure you he is. If you get more troubles from him, just remember that he's been permablocked before. Well, the problem is he edits from an AOL account so there's no point on blocking the IP. Regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :I can assure you he is. If you get more troubles from him, just remember that he's been permablocked before. Well, the problem is he edits from an AOL account so there's no point on blocking the IP. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 19:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

10888 +++$+++ Xdamr +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10888 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-26 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.259299020E09 +++$+++ Best wishes,   +++$+++ Best wishes,  [[User:Xdamr|<b><span style="font-family: Times"><span style="font-size:140%">X</span><span style="font-size:110%">damr</span></span>]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Xdamr|talk]]</sup></b> 21:17, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
10889 +++$+++ Xdamr +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10888 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.260002460E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Xdamr|<b><span style="font-family: Times"><span style="font-size:140%">X</span><span style="font-size:110%">damr</span></span>]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Xdamr|talk]]</sup></b> 00:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
10890 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10888 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.260005940E09 +++$+++ I think Wikipedia should have all 231, obviously linked to the battle\/action each represents, with a back link to the clasp from the battle\/vessel(s) involved. You are right though that a list of all 231 might appear daunting. The key question is how to make the list useful to someone who doesn't really know much, including what boat service is? It would be relatively straightforward to have the present article with three links along the lines of: \"For battles - click here\"; \"For boat service - click here\", etc. That would still yield two long lists. Alternatively, we could think in terms of grouping clasps by wars - French Revolutionary, Napoleonic, 1812, Gunboat, etc., or by war and theater such as Napoleonic War - Indian Ocean. Again, the trick will be to make it attractive to browse, easy to find what one is looking for, even if one doesn't know much, and ideally, be of a form that we could include some paintings where we have them to tart up the list. Thoughts?  +++$+++ :::I think Wikipedia should have all 231, obviously linked to the battle/action each represents, with a back link to the clasp from the battle/vessel(s) involved. You are right though that a list of all 231 might appear daunting. The key question is how to make the list useful to someone who doesn't really know much, including what boat service is? It would be relatively straightforward to have the present article with three links along the lines of: "For battles - click here"; "For boat service - click here", etc. That would still yield two long lists. Alternatively, we could think in terms of grouping clasps by wars - French Revolutionary, Napoleonic, 1812, Gunboat, etc., or by war and theater such as Napoleonic War - Indian Ocean. Again, the trick will be to make it attractive to browse, easy to find what one is looking for, even if one doesn't know much, and ideally, be of a form that we could include some paintings where we have them to tart up the list. Thoughts? [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 01:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
10891 +++$+++ Xdamr +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10888 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.260491700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::[[User:Xdamr|<b><span style="font-family: Times"><span style="font-size:140%">X</span><span style="font-size:110%">damr</span></span>]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Xdamr|talk]]</sup></b> 16:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
10892 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10888 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.260492660E09 +++$+++ Welcome back from the land of the cyber-dead, Xdamr. Been there too. Like the idea of turning the present NGSM page into a disambig page with two sub-pages for the 1847 and the 1915 medals. Makes a lot of sense. Not sure we need a \"List of clasps\" page if we simply have a series of links to separate pages by war. Have to run. Will revert later. Regards,  +++$+++ :::::Welcome back from the land of the cyber-dead, Xdamr. Been there too. Like the idea of turning the present NGSM page into a disambig page with two sub-pages for the 1847 and the 1915 medals. Makes a lot of sense. Not sure we need a "List of clasps" page if we simply have a series of links to separate pages by war. Have to run. Will revert later. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 16:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
10893 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10888 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.260509820E09 +++$+++ One issue that struck me as I thought about the reorganization is that the NGSM (1847) medal's official name is NGSM, without the date, and the article would have to make that clear in the first line. A second issue is who authorized the medal in 1847? Was it Parliament, the Admiralty, or ??? The article is mute on this point. +++$+++ :::::One issue that struck me as I thought about the reorganization is that the NGSM (1847) medal's official name is NGSM, without the date, and the article would have to make that clear in the first line. A second issue is who authorized the medal in 1847? Was it Parliament, the Admiralty, or ??? The article is mute on this point.[[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 21:37, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
10894 +++$+++ Xdamr +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10888 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-11 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.260595980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::::[[User:Xdamr|<b><span style="font-family: Times"><span style="font-size:140%">X</span><span style="font-size:110%">damr</span></span>]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Xdamr|talk]]</sup></b> 21:33, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
10895 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10888 +++$+++ 10888 +++$+++ 2009-12-11 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.260598200E09 +++$+++ Hi Xdamr, I see we were both editing the redirect\/disambig page at the same time, or at least I assume it was you.  I combined both our approaches. As for the List page, I would say we can hold off for now until the article gets unwieldy. I am still inclined to having at least three such list pages, one for each of the main wars. I am afraid that otherwise the list will get too long. However, one master list makes sense too as many\/most people likely to consult it will have no idea for which war the clasp was awarded. In the meantime, I am starting to work through the articles that already mention the medal and am changing the link to the 1847 article rather than the disambig page. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Xdamr, I see we were both editing the redirect/disambig page at the same time, or at least I assume it was you.  I combined both our approaches. As for the List page, I would say we can hold off for now until the article gets unwieldy. I am still inclined to having at least three such list pages, one for each of the main wars. I am afraid that otherwise the list will get too long. However, one master list makes sense too as many/most people likely to consult it will have no idea for which war the clasp was awarded. In the meantime, I am starting to work through the articles that already mention the medal and am changing the link to the 1847 article rather than the disambig page. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 22:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
10896 +++$+++ Xdamr +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10888 +++$+++ 10895 +++$+++ 2009-12-13 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.260758700E09 +++$+++ I like the idea of a large 'index' page, combined with smaller, more detailed by-war pages.  I'm going to go ahead and start [[List of clasps to the Naval General Service Medal (1847)]].  -- +++$+++ ::I like the idea of a large 'index' page, combined with smaller, more detailed by-war pages.  I'm going to go ahead and start [[List of clasps to the Naval General Service Medal (1847)]].  --[[User:Xdamr|<b><span style="font-family: Times"><span style="font-size:140%">X</span><span style="font-size:110%">damr</span></span>]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Xdamr|talk]]</sup></b> 18:45, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
10897 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10888 +++$+++ 10896 +++$+++ 2009-12-13 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.260759180E09 +++$+++ Roger that. I will hold off adding clasps or links until I see the page so that we don't end up in an edit conflict. As a related issue, in articles about the vessels, battles or actions that resulted in a clasp, I will continue to make the embedded link be to the [[Naval General Service Medal (1847)]] article. If someone wants to go further they should then further click on the [[List of clasps to the Naval General Service Medal (1847)]] link, or the sub-List articles.  +++$+++ :::Roger that. I will hold off adding clasps or links until I see the page so that we don't end up in an edit conflict. As a related issue, in articles about the vessels, battles or actions that resulted in a clasp, I will continue to make the embedded link be to the [[Naval General Service Medal (1847)]] article. If someone wants to go further they should then further click on the [[List of clasps to the Naval General Service Medal (1847)]] link, or the sub-List articles. [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 18:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

535180 +++$+++ Ferick +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-25 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.153887120E09 +++$+++ I sent them to your first email.  +++$+++ I sent them to your first email. [[User:Ferick|Ferick]] 21:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
535181 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535180 +++$+++ 535180 +++$+++ 2006-07-25 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.153887660E09 +++$+++ Got them, thanks! [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Got them, thanks! [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 21:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

569794 +++$+++ Dweller +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.176332280E09 +++$+++ Hi. You might have noticed my post at AN. Alex Wilkes doesn't seem to read his talk page. As the article has now been to AfD and subsequently speedied twice, can I suggest it's now salted? -- +++$+++ Hi. You might have noticed my post at AN. Alex Wilkes doesn't seem to read his talk page. As the article has now been to AfD and subsequently speedied twice, can I suggest it's now salted? --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] 15:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
569795 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569794 +++$+++ 569794 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.176332820E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ :Done. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 16:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
569796 +++$+++ Dweller +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569794 +++$+++ 569795 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.176332820E09 +++$+++ URA* -- +++$+++ ::URA* --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] 16:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

273038 +++$+++ Kf4bdy +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-26 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.161875640E09 +++$+++ I have no idea except that it seemed to be a revert war. I could be wrong and I will take my lumps if I am, but that is what it looked like to me. The one user seemed to resort to personal attacks toward the other and I have reported him to the personal attack page. So if I was wrong, I am sorry and I will take my punishment now. -- +++$+++ I have no idea except that it seemed to be a revert war. I could be wrong and I will take my lumps if I am, but that is what it looked like to me. The one user seemed to resort to personal attacks toward the other and I have reported him to the personal attack page. So if I was wrong, I am sorry and I will take my punishment now. --[[User:Kf4bdy|<font color="red"><b><i>Kf4bdy</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Kf4bdy|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Kf4bdy|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 08:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
273039 +++$+++ Kf4bdy +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273038 +++$+++ 273038 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.161876420E09 +++$+++ Sorry if I sounded snippy. Been a long night. Time to walk away for a while. See ya tomorrow! -- +++$+++ :Sorry if I sounded snippy. Been a long night. Time to walk away for a while. See ya tomorrow! --[[User:Kf4bdy|<font color="red"><b><i>Kf4bdy</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Kf4bdy|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Kf4bdy|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 08:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
273040 +++$+++ Wobble +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273038 +++$+++ 273039 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.161886020E09 +++$+++ Hi, concerning this article, I wonder if it is acceptable for me to point out that the IP address [[User:69.157.105.101]] has made some quite unsavory contributions to my talk page [[User_talk:Wobble#LOL|here]] and those of others of others.[[User talk:\xc9ponyme|here]] I think this is a dynamic IP address as there seem to be contributions made from several different IP addresses by the same person.  +++$+++ ::Hi, concerning this article, I wonder if it is acceptable for me to point out that the IP address [[User:69.157.105.101]] has made some quite unsavory contributions to my talk page [[User_talk:Wobble#LOL|here]] and those of others of others.[[User talk:Éponyme|here]] I think this is a dynamic IP address as there seem to be contributions made from several different IP addresses by the same person. [[User:Wobble|Alun]] 11:07, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

10898 +++$+++ Xdamr +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-14 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.260782880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Xdamr|<b><span style="font-family: Times"><span style="font-size:140%">X</span><span style="font-size:110%">damr</span></span>]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Xdamr|talk]]</sup></b> 01:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
10899 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10898 +++$+++ 10898 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.260783660E09 +++$+++ As for columns, I would like to keep the four that I set up originally, with a fifth for number of clasps issued, and a sixth for the conflict if you feel that is worthwhile, given that most will be pretty much synonymous with the grand classification, e.g. \"French Revolutionary Wars\". If we want to be more precise, we can put info in the Comment column, which would loose the \"Unissued\" info to the \"Number\" column. I also wouldn't put any date info in the \"Date\" column if the clasp already has the info. Gives us more white space and reduces redundancy. Lastly, I think the clasp info should duplicate the claps themselves, up to and including spelling, punctuation, and all caps. That way some collector or other person researching a specific clasp can find it easily. Make sense?  +++$+++ :As for columns, I would like to keep the four that I set up originally, with a fifth for number of clasps issued, and a sixth for the conflict if you feel that is worthwhile, given that most will be pretty much synonymous with the grand classification, e.g. "French Revolutionary Wars". If we want to be more precise, we can put info in the Comment column, which would loose the "Unissued" info to the "Number" column. I also wouldn't put any date info in the "Date" column if the clasp already has the info. Gives us more white space and reduces redundancy. Lastly, I think the clasp info should duplicate the claps themselves, up to and including spelling, punctuation, and all caps. That way some collector or other person researching a specific clasp can find it easily. Make sense? [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 01:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

535187 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535187 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-30 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.154321880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for intervening in the latest Ferick-Boris spat. Unfortunately I don't think this is something that's going to be resolved through discussion or appeals to reason, as Ferick has shown every sign of wanting to continue edit warring, ignoring consensus, deleting content for POV reasons, etc. I plan to take the matter to a [[WP:RFC|user-conduct RFC]] shortly as a prelude to arbitration, should that be necessary, with a view to banning him from Kosovo-related articles. He's been told what the rules are on plenty of occasions, so I think he needs to be given a simple choice now: follow the rules or get thrown out. I'll notify you and the other contributors to [[Talk:Kosovo]] and related pages when the RfC has been posted (hopefully Tuesday). --  +++$+++ Thanks for intervening in the latest Ferick-Boris spat. Unfortunately I don't think this is something that's going to be resolved through discussion or appeals to reason, as Ferick has shown every sign of wanting to continue edit warring, ignoring consensus, deleting content for POV reasons, etc. I plan to take the matter to a [[WP:RFC|user-conduct RFC]] shortly as a prelude to arbitration, should that be necessary, with a view to banning him from Kosovo-related articles. He's been told what the rules are on plenty of occasions, so I think he needs to be given a simple choice now: follow the rules or get thrown out. I'll notify you and the other contributors to [[Talk:Kosovo]] and related pages when the RfC has been posted (hopefully Tuesday). -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] 21:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
535188 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535187 +++$+++ 535187 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.154322300E09 +++$+++ No problem. I understand. There is also a clash of personalities going on too, which makes things quite unworkable too. I am no longer watching the Kosovo article (it was simply taking too much of my wikitime that I can put to better use somewhere else), so I would appreciate if you drop me a note here instead. Regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :No problem. I understand. There is also a clash of personalities going on too, which makes things quite unworkable too. I am no longer watching the Kosovo article (it was simply taking too much of my wikitime that I can put to better use somewhere else), so I would appreciate if you drop me a note here instead. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 22:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
535189 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535187 +++$+++ 535188 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.154322660E09 +++$+++ I rather think that the clash of personalities (which certainly exists, I agree) is secondary to Ferick's refusal to play by the rules of Wikipedia. It's at least arguable that if he wasn't such a plainly POV editor, other editors wouldn't clash with him so much. I'll drop you a line on your talk page when I've posted the RfC - I hope you'll be willing to add your views! --  +++$+++ ::I rather think that the clash of personalities (which certainly exists, I agree) is secondary to Ferick's refusal to play by the rules of Wikipedia. It's at least arguable that if he wasn't such a plainly POV editor, other editors wouldn't clash with him so much. I'll drop you a line on your talk page when I've posted the RfC - I hope you'll be willing to add your views! -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] 22:11, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
535190 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535187 +++$+++ 535189 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.154322780E09 +++$+++ Yes, I will do so. Thanks again. [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::Yes, I will do so. Thanks again. [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 22:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
535191 +++$+++ Spanked +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535187 +++$+++ 535190 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.154421060E09 +++$+++ Please note, if you care and have time, that ChrisO refuses to play by the rules of Wikipedia regarding my concerns and instead ChrisO fair games me with uncivility by: making unfounded accusations about vandalism, threatening to block me, and then being unproductive by filing a checkuser based on no evidence at all.  I'll drop you a line if and when I file an RFC or Arbitration against ChrisO. -- +++$+++ ::::Please note, if you care and have time, that ChrisO refuses to play by the rules of Wikipedia regarding my concerns and instead ChrisO fair games me with uncivility by: making unfounded accusations about vandalism, threatening to block me, and then being unproductive by filing a checkuser based on no evidence at all.  I'll drop you a line if and when I file an RFC or Arbitration against ChrisO. --[[User:Spanked|Spanked]] 01:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

273045 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273045 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.161978240E09 +++$+++ Brad, I think you should get your mainspace edit count up a tad so we can take you to RfA.  +++$+++ Brad, I think you should get your mainspace edit count up a tad so we can take you to RfA. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 12:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
273046 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273045 +++$+++ 273045 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.162008900E09 +++$+++ Before I would meet a lot of the RfA !voters' standards I probably need to do some more anti-vandal work (although there have been some attacks on a couple of my watchlisted articles this week so I've gotten to do more recently) and participate in deletion debates (I will admit XfD has never been a focus of mine).  As I expand my Wiki-experience over the next couple of months I will bear your thoughts in mind, and I will hope that this very talkpage edit right here isn't the one that puts my talkspace\/mainspace ratio over the edge and costs me my chance. :)  Thanks again and regards,  +++$+++ :Before I would meet a lot of the RfA !voters' standards I probably need to do some more anti-vandal work (although there have been some attacks on a couple of my watchlisted articles this week so I've gotten to do more recently) and participate in deletion debates (I will admit XfD has never been a focus of mine).  As I expand my Wiki-experience over the next couple of months I will bear your thoughts in mind, and I will hope that this very talkpage edit right here isn't the one that puts my talkspace/mainspace ratio over the edge and costs me my chance. :)  Thanks again and regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 21:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

10903 +++$+++ Ser Amantio di Nicolao +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-01 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.262347500E09 +++$+++ Any time.  Happy new year! --<font face=\"Old English Text MT\"> +++$+++ Any time.  Happy new year! --<font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|Ser Amantio di Nicolao]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|''Che dicono a Signa?'']]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ser Amantio di Nicolao|'''Lo dicono a Signa.''']]</sub> 04:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
10904 +++$+++ Ser Amantio di Nicolao +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10903 +++$+++ 10903 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.262357220E09 +++$+++ Indeed - no matter what the signatures say. :-) --<font face=\"Old English Text MT\"> +++$+++ :Indeed - no matter what the signatures say. :-) --<font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|Ser Amantio di Nicolao]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|''Che dicono a Signa?'']]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ser Amantio di Nicolao|'''Lo dicono a Signa.''']]</sub> 06:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

535192 +++$+++ Ferick +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-01 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.154458920E09 +++$+++ I have had the same experience with this same user. What you said rings very much true. I have told him before that his action leads me to believe that he is a rouge administrator. I am in a process of talking to several administrators about his behaviors. We shall see what comes out of it. I am happy to let you know what comes out of it. +++$+++ I have had the same experience with this same user. What you said rings very much true. I have told him before that his action leads me to believe that he is a rouge administrator. I am in a process of talking to several administrators about his behaviors. We shall see what comes out of it. I am happy to let you know what comes out of it.[[User:Ferick|Ferick]] 12:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
535193 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535192 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.154421300E09 +++$+++ I hold no grudge against [[User:ChrisO]]. Regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::::I hold no grudge against [[User:ChrisO]]. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 01:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

273049 +++$+++ Neutralizer +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-28 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.162035000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Neutralizer|Neutralizer]] 04:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
273050 +++$+++ Teekite +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273049 +++$+++ 273049 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.162036260E09 +++$+++ hmmm; yes Sarah you were editing both the Ignatieff article and its talk page quite a bit for someone uninterested in Canadian politics. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=20060813134320&limit=500&target=Sarah_Ewart Here] are about a dozen edits you made. I suggest you find a truly disinterested administrator to protect the article if it needs protecting but I do not see anything there other than a very benign edit war. Also, please explain,Sarah, why you left that misleading edit (\"''I am not Canadian and have no interest in Candian politics''\"[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Michael_Ignatieff&diff=prev&oldid=84179698]) on the talk page before you protected it?  +++$+++ :hmmm; yes Sarah you were editing both the Ignatieff article and its talk page quite a bit for someone uninterested in Canadian politics. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=20060813134320&limit=500&target=Sarah_Ewart Here] are about a dozen edits you made. I suggest you find a truly disinterested administrator to protect the article if it needs protecting but I do not see anything there other than a very benign edit war. Also, please explain,Sarah, why you left that misleading edit ("''I am not Canadian and have no interest in Candian politics''"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Michael_Ignatieff&diff=prev&oldid=84179698]) on the talk page before you protected it? [[User:Teekite|Teekite]] 04:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
273051 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273049 +++$+++ 273050 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.162036680E09 +++$+++ I edited the talk page, yes, trying to remove personal attacks and trolling. My involvement in that page was with regard to dealing with trolling and personal attacks, not content of the articles or any interest in Canadian politics. Oh, and you've been blocked as an obvious sock.  +++$+++ ::I edited the talk page, yes, trying to remove personal attacks and trolling. My involvement in that page was with regard to dealing with trolling and personal attacks, not content of the articles or any interest in Canadian politics. Oh, and you've been blocked as an obvious sock. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 04:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

535194 +++$+++ Bedders +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535194 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-31 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.154353440E09 +++$+++ Cheers for putting me in.  I'm sort of against categories and userboxes on user pages, but this could be handy for finding others who moght be able to help on my obscure subjects. -- +++$+++ Cheers for putting me in.  I'm sort of against categories and userboxes on user pages, but this could be handy for finding others who moght be able to help on my obscure subjects. --[[User:Bedders|Bedders]] 06:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
535195 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535194 +++$+++ 535194 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.154355120E09 +++$+++ Yes, this is exactly what I thought. [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Yes, this is exactly what I thought. [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 07:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

273052 +++$+++ Ottawaman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273052 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-28 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.162037400E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Michael_Ignatieff&diff=68393889&oldid=68393318 edits] which has nothing at all to do with personal attacks or trolling; it was your opinion about the validity of a source.  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Ignatieff&diff=68393889&oldid=68393318 edits] which has nothing at all to do with personal attacks or trolling; it was your opinion about the validity of a source. [[User:Ottawaman|Ottawaman]] 05:10, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
273053 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273052 +++$+++ 273052 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.162037700E09 +++$+++ Knock it off. Removing a completely inappropriate source which was deleted from Wikinews for the same reasons does not reflect a personal interest in Canadian politics or my adding content to the article. I didn't even know who Michael Ignatieff was until I read the Wikinews article and followed the link back here. Removing a source which violated our guidelines does not make me an involved admin or discredit my statement.  +++$+++ :Knock it off. Removing a completely inappropriate source which was deleted from Wikinews for the same reasons does not reflect a personal interest in Canadian politics or my adding content to the article. I didn't even know who Michael Ignatieff was until I read the Wikinews article and followed the link back here. Removing a source which violated our guidelines does not make me an involved admin or discredit my statement. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 05:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
273054 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273052 +++$+++ 273052 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.162037820E09 +++$+++ And FYI, I acknowledged my removal of the Wikinews source nearly an hour ago. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Neutralizer#Blocked]  +++$+++ :And FYI, I acknowledged my removal of the Wikinews source nearly an hour ago. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Neutralizer#Blocked] [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 05:17, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

569797 +++$+++ TheRealFennShysa +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.176358680E09 +++$+++ FYI - 69.206.229.231 is back editing the Tiny Toons and Animaniacs articles - stronger block may be necessary this time.   +++$+++ FYI - 69.206.229.231 is back editing the Tiny Toons and Animaniacs articles - stronger block may be necessary this time.  [[User:TheRealFennShysa|TheRealFennShysa]] 23:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
569798 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569797 +++$+++ 569797 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.176358740E09 +++$+++ Can you report vandalism to [[:WP:AIV]], please?  I'm going offline now as it's past midnight here in the UK.  Thanks,  +++$+++ :Can you report vandalism to [[:WP:AIV]], please?  I'm going offline now as it's past midnight here in the UK.  Thanks, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
569799 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569797 +++$+++ 569797 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.176358980E09 +++$+++ I've blocked after a quick review but the reporting to AIV is the better thing to do in future in case an admin is offline and the vandalism goes unchecked. Regards,  +++$+++ :I've blocked after a quick review but the reporting to AIV is the better thing to do in future in case an admin is offline and the vandalism goes unchecked. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
569800 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569797 +++$+++ 569797 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.176442980E09 +++$+++ If you look at [[:Manchester United#The_Treble_.281998-99.29]], you will see that the result has already been recorded.  +++$+++ :If you look at [[:Manchester United#The_Treble_.281998-99.29]], you will see that the result has already been recorded. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

273056 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-28 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.162062000E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 12:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
273057 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273056 +++$+++ 273056 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.162062240E09 +++$+++ Er, I think you were right the first time. Spring forward, fall back... -- +++$+++ :Er, I think you were right the first time. Spring forward, fall back... --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 12:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
273058 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273056 +++$+++ 273057 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.162062840E09 +++$+++ It's spring in Melbourne isn't it? Just like up here in Sydney, right? ;-)  The old \"forgot the other hemisphere\" trick. ha ha.  -- +++$+++ ::It's spring in Melbourne isn't it? Just like up here in Sydney, right? ;-)  The old "forgot the other hemisphere" trick. ha ha.  --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 12:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

613488 +++$+++ Calliopejen1 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-20 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.232445480E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just tagged a commons image of yours for deletion as lacking sources. Please go there to specify the sources so the deletion can be speedy closed. http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Commons:Deletion_requests\/File:Darwin200-rhea_supper.jpg Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi, I just tagged a commons image of yours for deletion as lacking sources. Please go there to specify the sources so the deletion can be speedy closed. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Darwin200-rhea_supper.jpg Thanks! [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|talk]]) 01:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
613489 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613488 +++$+++ 613488 +++$+++ 2009-01-20 08:33:00 +++$+++ 1.232469180E09 +++$+++ Sorted, as requested. .  +++$+++ :Sorted, as requested. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 08:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

395035 +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-27 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.269699840E09 +++$+++ Your outraged tone is not warranted, appropriate or productive. Please treat me as you would like to be treated. If you do not, I plan to archive your notes and not listen to you.  +++$+++ Your outraged tone is not warranted, appropriate or productive. Please treat me as you would like to be treated. If you do not, I plan to archive your notes and not listen to you. [[User:Maurreen|Maurreen]] ([[User talk:Maurreen#top|talk]]) 07:24, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
395036 +++$+++ BrownHairedGirl +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ 2010-03-27 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.269707820E09 +++$+++ I have assumed throughout that your long series of errors are being made are acting in good faith, and I ask you to assume that my concerns are being raised in good faith. Please address those problems rather than just complaining about the tone, and please STOP recategorising articles until you have discussed these issues. Thank you. -- +++$+++ :I have assumed throughout that your long series of errors are being made are acting in good faith, and I ask you to assume that my concerns are being raised in good faith. Please address those problems rather than just complaining about the tone, and please STOP recategorising articles until you have discussed these issues. Thank you. --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#996600; cursor: not-allowed;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 09:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
395037 +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ 395036 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.269792300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Maurreen|Maurreen]] ([[User talk:Maurreen#top|talk]]) 09:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
395038 +++$+++ BrownHairedGirl +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ 395037 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.269801960E09 +++$+++ I have taken the time to identify and spell out a whole set of problems, with a list of bad edits at [[User_talk:Maurreen#More_bad_edits]] and detailed explanations of the errors in another list at [[User_talk:Maurreen#And_more_problems]]. You have not replied to any of the points raised in those lists, let alone tried to fix them, so at the point the only way of stopping the damage is to seek some restriction on your editing.  -- +++$+++ :::I have taken the time to identify and spell out a whole set of problems, with a list of bad edits at [[User_talk:Maurreen#More_bad_edits]] and detailed explanations of the errors in another list at [[User_talk:Maurreen#And_more_problems]]. You have not replied to any of the points raised in those lists, let alone tried to fix them, so at the point the only way of stopping the damage is to seek some restriction on your editing.  --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#996600; cursor: not-allowed;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 11:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
395039 +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ 395038 +++$+++ 2010-03-29 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.269872460E09 +++$+++ I remain willing to compromise. That offer addresses any past, current or future concerns you have about my category work. If you decide you'd like to discuss a compromise, please let me know.  +++$+++ ::::I remain willing to compromise. That offer addresses any past, current or future concerns you have about my category work. If you decide you'd like to discuss a compromise, please let me know. [[User:Maurreen|Maurreen]] ([[User talk:Maurreen#top|talk]]) 07:21, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
395040 +++$+++ BrownHairedGirl +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ 395039 +++$+++ 2010-04-03 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.270291920E09 +++$+++ The solution may be 2 compromise, but it may laos be one of the extremes. Simply splitting the difference does not produce good results.  -- +++$+++ :::::The solution may be 2 compromise, but it may laos be one of the extremes. Simply splitting the difference does not produce good results.  --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#996600; cursor: not-allowed;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 03:52, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
395041 +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ 395040 +++$+++ 2010-04-03 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.270292100E09 +++$+++ You are free to undo or redo what I do. That's also how the [[WP:BRD|bold revert discuss cycle]] works.  +++$+++ ::::::You are free to undo or redo what I do. That's also how the [[WP:BRD|bold revert discuss cycle]] works. [[User:Maurreen|Maurreen]] ([[User talk:Maurreen#top|talk]]) 03:55, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
395042 +++$+++ BrownHairedGirl +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ 395041 +++$+++ 2010-04-03 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.270330680E09 +++$+++ What you seem to be saying is that you will carry on creating piles of badly-parented and badly-named categories, sometimes duplicated or even [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2010_April_3#Category:U.S._Northeast_journalists|triplicated]], and you will recategorise hundreds of articles with dozens of problems ... and other editors will just have to run around tidying up after you.  That's not the way that consensus works: when there's a pattern of problems, please discuss and try to resolve the approach which is causing them. -- +++$+++ :::::::What you seem to be saying is that you will carry on creating piles of badly-parented and badly-named categories, sometimes duplicated or even [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_April_3#Category:U.S._Northeast_journalists|triplicated]], and you will recategorise hundreds of articles with dozens of problems ... and other editors will just have to run around tidying up after you.  That's not the way that consensus works: when there's a pattern of problems, please discuss and try to resolve the approach which is causing them. --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#996600; cursor: not-allowed;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 14:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
395043 +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ 395042 +++$+++ 2010-04-04 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.270390800E09 +++$+++ What I have said is that I will not stop my category work. I have also said that I'm willing to compromise.  +++$+++ ::::::::What I have said is that I will not stop my category work. I have also said that I'm willing to compromise. [[User:Maurreen|Maurreen]] ([[User talk:Maurreen#top|talk]]) 07:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
395044 +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ 395042 +++$+++ 2010-04-04 07:38:00 +++$+++ 1.270391880E09 +++$+++ Also, the way things are supposed to work is to focus on the content, and not the editor, as you continue to do in your CFD nominations. That does not help resolve anything. The CFDs should stand or fall on their own merits or not.  +++$+++ ::::::::Also, the way things are supposed to work is to focus on the content, and not the editor, as you continue to do in your CFD nominations. That does not help resolve anything. The CFDs should stand or fall on their own merits or not. [[User:Maurreen|Maurreen]] ([[User talk:Maurreen#top|talk]]) 07:38, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
395045 +++$+++ BrownHairedGirl +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ 395044 +++$+++ 2010-04-04 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.270393380E09 +++$+++ I am trying hard to remain polite here, but what I see is hundreds of miscategorisations and dozens of  misconceived new cateories (along with a few salvageable ones) ... and having putting a lot of time and effrt into setting out all the problems I find it very odd that you have still addressed none of the issues I have raised. So what do you propose? -- +++$+++ :::::::::I am trying hard to remain polite here, but what I see is hundreds of miscategorisations and dozens of  misconceived new cateories (along with a few salvageable ones) ... and having putting a lot of time and effrt into setting out all the problems I find it very odd that you have still addressed none of the issues I have raised. So what do you propose? --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#996600; cursor: not-allowed;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 08:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
395046 +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395035 +++$+++ 395045 +++$+++ 2010-04-04 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.270393920E09 +++$+++ I am open to counter-proposals.  +++$+++ ::::::::::I am open to counter-proposals. [[User:Maurreen|Maurreen]] ([[User talk:Maurreen#top|talk]]) 08:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

535204 +++$+++ Bedders +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535204 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-04 10:42:00 +++$+++ 1.154713320E09 +++$+++ This has turned into a list of articles I need to work on :) -- +++$+++ This has turned into a list of articles I need to work on :) --[[User:Bedders|Bedders]] 10:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
535205 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535204 +++$+++ 535204 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.154761800E09 +++$+++ He he. Thanks very much for your kind words. You really managed to put a smile on my face :) I will definitely try to get them done (eventually!). I can't believe there's no image for the Belmont Transmitter. I have some pictures for the Battle of Britain Memorial Flight at RAF Coningsby and the Appleby-Frodingham Railway but need to remember what did I do with the prints... I'll get back to you later on. Cheers, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :He he. Thanks very much for your kind words. You really managed to put a smile on my face :) I will definitely try to get them done (eventually!). I can't believe there's no image for the Belmont Transmitter. I have some pictures for the Battle of Britain Memorial Flight at RAF Coningsby and the Appleby-Frodingham Railway but need to remember what did I do with the prints... I'll get back to you later on. Cheers, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 00:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

10918 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-13 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.276481640E09 +++$+++ Acad, I've just removed your capitals from \"Sixth Rate Post-ship\" in [[HMS Black Joke (1827)]].  This is incorrect usage - in this example, \"sixth-rate post-ship\" is an adjectival modifier of \"''Esk''\".  For example, it would be correct to write \"he served in the frigate ''Somerset'' for 3 years.\" In fact, I would go so far as to say that neither \"sixth-rate\" nor \"post-ship\" could ordinarily be considered proper nouns, and so should not be capitalised anyway.  I hope this makes sense, and if you've got any questions, please just ask at the talk page. Yours, trying not to sound too annoying,  +++$+++ Acad, I've just removed your capitals from "Sixth Rate Post-ship" in [[HMS Black Joke (1827)]].  This is incorrect usage - in this example, "sixth-rate post-ship" is an adjectival modifier of "''Esk''".  For example, it would be correct to write "he served in the frigate ''Somerset'' for 3 years." In fact, I would go so far as to say that neither "sixth-rate" nor "post-ship" could ordinarily be considered proper nouns, and so should not be capitalised anyway.  I hope this makes sense, and if you've got any questions, please just ask at the talk page. Yours, trying not to sound too annoying, [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 19:14, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
10919 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10918 +++$+++ 10918 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.276492920E09 +++$+++ Hi Shem, I have to disagree vehemently with you on this. Sixth Rate and Post-Ship are titles, not adjectives. E.g.: \"Captain Jones was captain of the good ship Lollypop.\" \"HMS Pinafore was a second-rate Sixth Rate Post-ship, being old, broken-down and armed with 20 guns; she was under the command of Captain Jones.\" \"Captain Nelson of the First Rate HMS Victory had a first rate mind.\" \"The lieutenant in question was Lieutenant Smith, who was First Lieutenant of the USS Lollypop.\" Check with Rif Winfield on this if the above examples don't make the point. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Shem, I have to disagree vehemently with you on this. Sixth Rate and Post-Ship are titles, not adjectives. E.g.: "Captain Jones was captain of the good ship Lollypop." "HMS Pinafore was a second-rate Sixth Rate Post-ship, being old, broken-down and armed with 20 guns; she was under the command of Captain Jones." "Captain Nelson of the First Rate HMS Victory had a first rate mind." "The lieutenant in question was Lieutenant Smith, who was First Lieutenant of the USS Lollypop." Check with Rif Winfield on this if the above examples don't make the point. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin|talk]]) 22:22, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
10920 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10918 +++$+++ 10919 +++$+++ 2010-06-14 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.276525560E09 +++$+++ Acad, I'm afraid you're missing the point.  If it's not a proper noun, it doesn't get a capital - see [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#General_principles]] and [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Military_terms]].  As far as sixth rate goes, it is analogous to frigate; neither of them are proper nouns. On the subject of hyphens, \"sixth rate\" should only get a hyphen when it is describing another noun adjectivally, for example, \"the sixth-rate ''Surprise''\".  I'll ask Rif to drop by this page anyway. Yours  +++$+++ ::Acad, I'm afraid you're missing the point.  If it's not a proper noun, it doesn't get a capital - see [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#General_principles]] and [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Military_terms]].  As far as sixth rate goes, it is analogous to frigate; neither of them are proper nouns. On the subject of hyphens, "sixth rate" should only get a hyphen when it is describing another noun adjectivally, for example, "the sixth-rate ''Surprise''".  I'll ask Rif to drop by this page anyway. Yours [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 07:26, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
10921 +++$+++ Rif Winfield +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10918 +++$+++ 10918 +++$+++ 2010-06-14 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.276531140E09 +++$+++ Incidentally, it is uncertain to what extent the adjectival and noun distrinction applied at that time. Frequently in contemporary references it is the vessel's ''name'' which is being used adjectivally, e.g. \"the ''Boreas'' frigate\" or \"the ''Devastation'' bomb vessel\".  +++$+++ :Incidentally, it is uncertain to what extent the adjectival and noun distrinction applied at that time. Frequently in contemporary references it is the vessel's ''name'' which is being used adjectivally, e.g. "the ''Boreas'' frigate" or "the ''Devastation'' bomb vessel". [[User:Rif Winfield|Rif Winfield]] ([[User talk:Rif Winfield|talk]]) 08:59, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
10922 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10918 +++$+++ 10920 +++$+++ 2010-06-14 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.276554720E09 +++$+++ Hi all, while thinking about this, I have come up with other relevant examples: \"Captain the Honourable Sir John Smith\" is not the same thing as the honourable Captain Sir John Smith. It would also be incorrect to refer to him as \"Captain the honourable Sir John Smith\". In this case, the Honourable is a title, not an adjective. Also, \"her majesty's yacht, the H(er) M(ajesty's) S(hip) Britannica\". None of the terms in HMS, or even USS for that matter, are proper nouns, yet we capitalize them. The problem is that the terms \"first rate\" and \"second rate\" have come to have adjectival meanings derived from their origins and to use them in the naval setting but without the capitalization can give rise to a totally erroneous reading. Again, as Rif has pointed out, a Second Rate could be first-rate or second-rate, or even third-rate. This is one place where the Wikipedia style manual is just not appropriate. To privilege current usage over the contemporary usage is anachronistic. Regards,  +++$+++ :::Hi all, while thinking about this, I have come up with other relevant examples: "Captain the Honourable Sir John Smith" is not the same thing as the honourable Captain Sir John Smith. It would also be incorrect to refer to him as "Captain the honourable Sir John Smith". In this case, the Honourable is a title, not an adjective. Also, "her majesty's yacht, the H(er) M(ajesty's) S(hip) Britannica". None of the terms in HMS, or even USS for that matter, are proper nouns, yet we capitalize them. The problem is that the terms "first rate" and "second rate" have come to have adjectival meanings derived from their origins and to use them in the naval setting but without the capitalization can give rise to a totally erroneous reading. Again, as Rif has pointed out, a Second Rate could be first-rate or second-rate, or even third-rate. This is one place where the Wikipedia style manual is just not appropriate. To privilege current usage over the contemporary usage is anachronistic. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 15:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

263964 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263964 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-20 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.169324640E09 +++$+++ There is a thread concerning your interaction with another user at ANI, I would appreciate a comment from you on the matter. Thanks.  +++$+++ There is a thread concerning your interaction with another user at ANI, I would appreciate a comment from you on the matter. Thanks. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 12:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
263965 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 263964 +++$+++ 263964 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.169332920E09 +++$+++ The issue will escalate. I will continue to monitor the user, but do it in a less vocal way.  +++$+++ :The issue will escalate. I will continue to monitor the user, but do it in a less vocal way. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:42, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

273066 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273066 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.162007520E09 +++$+++ Last night, I ran across an article he placed that contained a list of Big East teams' rivalries. I Speedy'd it as listcruft. He went up in smoke then, insisting he was trying to fix a section in the original [[Big East]] article. I went back to that article and reverted the removal of the section in question so that info would not be lost, and perhaps be addressed in a different fashion. Haven't been on since then (had hand surgery this morning -- little more difficult to do this one handed; the anesthesia hasn't worn off completely yet). But you know I mean well, and am only trying to do right. Don't (frankly) care about Mr. Foster's bruised ego. No worries. Thanks! -- +++$+++ Last night, I ran across an article he placed that contained a list of Big East teams' rivalries. I Speedy'd it as listcruft. He went up in smoke then, insisting he was trying to fix a section in the original [[Big East]] article. I went back to that article and reverted the removal of the section in question so that info would not be lost, and perhaps be addressed in a different fashion. Haven't been on since then (had hand surgery this morning -- little more difficult to do this one handed; the anesthesia hasn't worn off completely yet). But you know I mean well, and am only trying to do right. Don't (frankly) care about Mr. Foster's bruised ego. No worries. Thanks! --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] 20:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
273067 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273066 +++$+++ 273066 +++$+++ 2006-10-29 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.162158000E09 +++$+++ No, it's not necessary (at least not at present), but thank you for the offer. As an aside, it looks as if Mr. Foster may have been logging in with just his IP number (67.150.49.94) as recently as last night. There was a single edit to [[Big East Conference]] with a similarly snarky comment, as well as a single vandalizing effort to my userpage. He\/she hasn't logged in since that point AFAIK. -- +++$+++ :No, it's not necessary (at least not at present), but thank you for the offer. As an aside, it looks as if Mr. Foster may have been logging in with just his IP number (67.150.49.94) as recently as last night. There was a single edit to [[Big East Conference]] with a similarly snarky comment, as well as a single vandalizing effort to my userpage. He/she hasn't logged in since that point AFAIK. --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] 13:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

45511 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45511 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-06 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.254865020E09 +++$+++ I've noticed you taking a (welcome) interest in this article. What's your opinion of it? It's obviously woefully undercited, but the more I look at it the more I think it needs doing to it. There's almost nothing about the political background that motivated the plot, we're not told how the conspirators met, or what kind of men they were, there's very little about the events that were planned to follow the explosion, Monteagle's role and his relationship with Cecil isn't properly explained, that Cecil almost certainly knew of the plot for some time before 5 November but allowed it to continue for maximum political advantage when it was \"discovered\" is barely touched on ... -- +++$+++ I've noticed you taking a (welcome) interest in this article. What's your opinion of it? It's obviously woefully undercited, but the more I look at it the more I think it needs doing to it. There's almost nothing about the political background that motivated the plot, we're not told how the conspirators met, or what kind of men they were, there's very little about the events that were planned to follow the explosion, Monteagle's role and his relationship with Cecil isn't properly explained, that Cecil almost certainly knew of the plot for some time before 5 November but allowed it to continue for maximum political advantage when it was "discovered" is barely touched on ... --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 14:37, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
45512 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45511 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-06 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.254866580E09 +++$+++ I've had it on my watchlist since last November (or maybe the one before) and have had a go at it now and again. Your recent edits piqued my interest again so I started adding some references instead of doing what I should be doing getting on with some work for my employer. The reference I've been using for the recent edits is a really good website as it uses stuff from the government archives, yet it was just in the \"external links\" before, although it looks like it's been used already. There are some nice illustrations there too which we could probably use, although they use them \"by permission of the British Library etc\" so I don't suppose they'd be too pleased. I've just ordered a book I came across on Google books called ''A companion to the folklore, myths & customs of Britain''  By Marc Alexander, which I can see being useful for a few articles as well as this one. I also found one called ''The Powder Treason'' by Michael Dax which looks useful. There's certainly a lot to do on this one - maybe it could be your next shot for a front page FA for November :) I've no doubt we'll be seeing the Moors Murders there soon. Glad to see you got rid of the trivia section too - I was thinking of doing that myself.  +++$+++ ::I've had it on my watchlist since last November (or maybe the one before) and have had a go at it now and again. Your recent edits piqued my interest again so I started adding some references instead of doing what I should be doing getting on with some work for my employer. The reference I've been using for the recent edits is a really good website as it uses stuff from the government archives, yet it was just in the "external links" before, although it looks like it's been used already. There are some nice illustrations there too which we could probably use, although they use them "by permission of the British Library etc" so I don't suppose they'd be too pleased. I've just ordered a book I came across on Google books called ''A companion to the folklore, myths & customs of Britain''  By Marc Alexander, which I can see being useful for a few articles as well as this one. I also found one called ''The Powder Treason'' by Michael Dax which looks useful. There's certainly a lot to do on this one - maybe it could be your next shot for a front page FA for November :) I've no doubt we'll be seeing the Moors Murders there soon. Glad to see you got rid of the trivia section too - I was thinking of doing that myself. [[User:Richerman|Richerman]] ([[User talk:Richerman#top|talk]]) 15:03, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
45513 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45511 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-06 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.254870060E09 +++$+++ I think we've left it a bit late for an FAC before 5 November, but that gives us plenty of time to get it ready for next year. :-) -- +++$+++ :::I think we've left it a bit late for an FAC before 5 November, but that gives us plenty of time to get it ready for next year. :-) --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 16:01, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
45514 +++$+++ Parrot of Doom +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45511 +++$+++ 45511 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.257985620E09 +++$+++ Do you fancy helping out at [[Gunpowder Plot]]?  I've taken it upon myself (Malleus is helping also) to kick it into shape, and noticed you'd commented on the article's talk page.  There is a lot of work.  Right now I'm just working through the story, I haven't really organised any kind of structure.  Hence not all the conspirators are yet biog'd. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ *Do you fancy helping out at [[Gunpowder Plot]]?  I've taken it upon myself (Malleus is helping also) to kick it into shape, and noticed you'd commented on the article's talk page.  There is a lot of work.  Right now I'm just working through the story, I haven't really organised any kind of structure.  Hence not all the conspirators are yet biog'd. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Parrot of Doom|Parrot]] [[User talk:Parrot of Doom|of Doom]]</span> 16:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

10924 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-14 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.276577700E09 +++$+++ As an aside, please go to [[:Category:Set indices on ships]] and click on any of the fairly well-used RN names; you'll see that usage follows the employment lower case almost exclusively (I haven't found any wrong yet).  Yours,  +++$+++ As an aside, please go to [[:Category:Set indices on ships]] and click on any of the fairly well-used RN names; you'll see that usage follows the employment lower case almost exclusively (I haven't found any wrong yet).  Yours, [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 21:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
10925 +++$+++ Rif Winfield +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10924 +++$+++ 10924 +++$+++ 2010-06-15 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.276612080E09 +++$+++ I think that we need to use common sense in dealing with historical data. The eighteenth and much of the nineteenth century used initial capitalisation to a much greater degree than we would nowadays, so the line must be drawn somewhere. But the rating of a warship was always given with initial capitals (including a capital \"R\", please note) because it formed part of the designation of that particular vessel (independent of the ''type'' or ''class'' of vessel it was).  +++$+++ :I think that we need to use common sense in dealing with historical data. The eighteenth and much of the nineteenth century used initial capitalisation to a much greater degree than we would nowadays, so the line must be drawn somewhere. But the rating of a warship was always given with initial capitals (including a capital "R", please note) because it formed part of the designation of that particular vessel (independent of the ''type'' or ''class'' of vessel it was). [[User:Rif Winfield|Rif Winfield]] ([[User talk:Rif Winfield|talk]]) 07:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
10926 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10924 +++$+++ 10925 +++$+++ 2010-06-15 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.276623300E09 +++$+++ Rif, Acad, there is little point trying to agree anything here.  If you think the current guidelines are wrong, please try to gain a consensus at the appropriate talk page.  I would say again, though, that historical usage is utterly irrelevant to the discussion, except where directly quoted.  By the same argument you could suggest some rather unusual spelling rules as well!  Yours,  +++$+++ ::Rif, Acad, there is little point trying to agree anything here.  If you think the current guidelines are wrong, please try to gain a consensus at the appropriate talk page.  I would say again, though, that historical usage is utterly irrelevant to the discussion, except where directly quoted.  By the same argument you could suggest some rather unusual spelling rules as well!  Yours, [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 10:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
10927 +++$+++ Rif Winfield +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10924 +++$+++ 10924 +++$+++ 2010-06-15 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.276636560E09 +++$+++ I have looked at the guidelines (and they are ''guidelines'', not absolute rules). They state \"If possible, as with spelling, use rules appropriate to the cultural and linguistic context.\" The cultural context of the period was to capitalise \"First Rate\", etc. I shall continue to do so, in book publishing and on Wikipedia. Incidentally, my next book (coincidentally entitled \"First Rate\" - note the  capitals) is published by Seaforth in about 3 months time. +++$+++ *I have looked at the guidelines (and they are ''guidelines'', not absolute rules). They state "If possible, as with spelling, use rules appropriate to the cultural and linguistic context." The cultural context of the period was to capitalise "First Rate", etc. I shall continue to do so, in book publishing and on Wikipedia. Incidentally, my next book (coincidentally entitled "First Rate" - note the  capitals) is published by Seaforth in about 3 months time.[[User:Rif Winfield|Rif Winfield]] ([[User talk:Rif Winfield|talk]]) 14:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
10928 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10924 +++$+++ 10927 +++$+++ 2010-06-15 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.276653720E09 +++$+++ Hi rif, I agree with you, as you know, and will follow a similar policy. I haven't decided yet whether to take this matter up on the policy page. I suspect that Shem is correct, that if I do I will be shouted down. Wikipedia is heavily US-based, and furthermore, few people have the historical perspective. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Hi rif, I agree with you, as you know, and will follow a similar policy. I haven't decided yet whether to take this matter up on the policy page. I suspect that Shem is correct, that if I do I will be shouted down. Wikipedia is heavily US-based, and furthermore, few people have the historical perspective. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 19:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
10929 +++$+++ Rif Winfield +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10924 +++$+++ 10924 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.276701840E09 +++$+++ Noted, Acad. Sadly it is always difficult to persuade people that they are lacking in the knowledge on which to base their opinion. Incidentally, this statement does not apply to Shem, for whom I have great respect (I understand he is a serving RN officer), but to those who \"lead\" majority (perhaps?) opinion but are unversed in the appropriate historical research and contextual analysis.  +++$+++ :Noted, Acad. Sadly it is always difficult to persuade people that they are lacking in the knowledge on which to base their opinion. Incidentally, this statement does not apply to Shem, for whom I have great respect (I understand he is a serving RN officer), but to those who "lead" majority (perhaps?) opinion but are unversed in the appropriate historical research and contextual analysis. [[User:Rif Winfield|Rif Winfield]] ([[User talk:Rif Winfield|talk]]) 08:24, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
10930 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10924 +++$+++ 10929 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.276735500E09 +++$+++ Rif, I'm grateful for your comments (I am assuming you meant \"not\", rather than \"to\" where I've underlined above!) While we're on respect, may I say what a pleasure it is to have access to your considerable talents, and may I also note how impressed I am by Acad's sheer volume of work. Yours, as ever,  +++$+++ ::Rif, I'm grateful for your comments (I am assuming you meant "not", rather than "to" where I've underlined above!) While we're on respect, may I say what a pleasure it is to have access to your considerable talents, and may I also note how impressed I am by Acad's sheer volume of work. Yours, as ever, [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 17:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
10931 +++$+++ Rif Winfield +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10924 +++$+++ 10924 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.276745640E09 +++$+++ Indeed; and you are perfectly correct that the word you underlined should be \"not\", and I have amended it to say that.  +++$+++ :Indeed; and you are perfectly correct that the word you underlined should be "not", and I have amended it to say that. [[User:Rif Winfield|Rif Winfield]] ([[User talk:Rif Winfield|talk]]) 20:34, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

535217 +++$+++ Noah30 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.155271020E09 +++$+++ best regards -- +++$+++ best regards --[[User:Noah30|Noah30]] 21:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
535218 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535217 +++$+++ 535217 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.155271320E09 +++$+++ Sorry Noah30, actually I am not an admin, so I have no real power to block him. The best thing I can do is to list this at the 3RR and\/or email William Connelly (who already blocked the IP once before). [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Sorry Noah30, actually I am not an admin, so I have no real power to block him. The best thing I can do is to list this at the 3RR and/or email William Connelly (who already blocked the IP once before). [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 21:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

273074 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.161984480E09 +++$+++ Good, bring up information from verifiable reliable sources and I will have no problem. Thats what I've been doing all along, nice to see that you have now admitted that you are just now going to do that, as opposed to before. +++$+++ Good, bring up information from verifiable reliable sources and I will have no problem. Thats what I've been doing all along, nice to see that you have now admitted that you are just now going to do that, as opposed to before.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 14:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
273075 +++$+++ Grandmaster +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273074 +++$+++ 273074 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.162050180E09 +++$+++ Khosrow is desperately trying to avoid the answer to the question why he removed direct quotes from reliable sources. So many words, and no answer at all. Only personal accusations. I responded in more detail on [[Talk:History of the name Azerbaijan]]. Please have a look at that page, Sarah, I would appreciate your input. And [[Encyclopaedia Iranica]] was created and run by [[Ehsan Yarshater]], who\u2019s Persian, and editorial board is chaired by [[Mahmoud Khayami]], also Iranian. It is an authoritative scientific source, and it is as much Iranian as it is Western.  +++$+++ : Khosrow is desperately trying to avoid the answer to the question why he removed direct quotes from reliable sources. So many words, and no answer at all. Only personal accusations. I responded in more detail on [[Talk:History of the name Azerbaijan]]. Please have a look at that page, Sarah, I would appreciate your input. And [[Encyclopaedia Iranica]] was created and run by [[Ehsan Yarshater]], who’s Persian, and editorial board is chaired by [[Mahmoud Khayami]], also Iranian. It is an authoritative scientific source, and it is as much Iranian as it is Western. [[User:Grandmaster|Grandmaster]] 08:43, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
273076 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273074 +++$+++ 273075 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.162075740E09 +++$+++ '''Sarah, its obvious that GM is not even reading my comments. I take the time to sit down, read his comments, and reply, and he cant even take the time to atleast read my comments. How are we going to get anywhere when he is being so disruptive?''' +++$+++ ::'''Sarah, its obvious that GM is not even reading my comments. I take the time to sit down, read his comments, and reply, and he cant even take the time to atleast read my comments. How are we going to get anywhere when he is being so disruptive?'''[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 15:49, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
273077 +++$+++ Grandmaster +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273074 +++$+++ 273076 +++$+++ 2006-10-31 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.162304700E09 +++$+++ Once again, Khosrow, how can I distort the source by quoting it? Why the quote was removed from the article? Please provide a valid explanation.  +++$+++ ::: Once again, Khosrow, how can I distort the source by quoting it? Why the quote was removed from the article? Please provide a valid explanation. [[User:Grandmaster|Grandmaster]] 06:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

10933 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10933 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-16 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.276731060E09 +++$+++ Acad, I note your recent edits to [[first rate]] and [[fifth rate]].  Please note that \"first rate\" is correct when used as a noun (\"the first rate was the largest type of warship\"), and that a hyphen is only required when the phrase is used adjectivally (\"a first-rate ship was typically armed with over 100 guns\").  It is for this reason that we hyphenate \"''Acheron''-class destroyer\" but not \"the ''Acheron'' class\", and that Rif objects (correctly) to \"post-ship\".  Please let me know if I'm not being clear enough.  Yours,  +++$+++ Acad, I note your recent edits to [[first rate]] and [[fifth rate]].  Please note that "first rate" is correct when used as a noun ("the first rate was the largest type of warship"), and that a hyphen is only required when the phrase is used adjectivally ("a first-rate ship was typically armed with over 100 guns").  It is for this reason that we hyphenate "''Acheron''-class destroyer" but not "the ''Acheron'' class", and that Rif objects (correctly) to "post-ship".  Please let me know if I'm not being clear enough.  Yours, [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 16:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
10934 +++$+++ Rif Winfield +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10933 +++$+++ 10933 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.276745340E09 +++$+++ \"First Rate\" is ''always'' a noun when refering to the formal classification of a warship. Its only use as an adjective (when the hyphen is permissable and indeed required) is when the wording is being used to describe the ''quality'' of a particular vessel (of whatever size and Rate).  +++$+++ *"First Rate" is ''always'' a noun when refering to the formal classification of a warship. Its only use as an adjective (when the hyphen is permissable and indeed required) is when the wording is being used to describe the ''quality'' of a particular vessel (of whatever size and Rate). [[User:Rif Winfield|Rif Winfield]] ([[User talk:Rif Winfield|talk]]) 20:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
10935 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10933 +++$+++ 10934 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.276755060E09 +++$+++ Hi Shem & Rif, that was my feeling too, so imagine my surprise when I clicked on one of the links in an article, where the term was \"first rate\", only to see the click being redirected to \"Frst-rate\" as the title of the Wikipedia article about \"First Rates\". I figured, all right, if we are going to be wrong, let's at least be consistently wrong. If we are going to call a First Rate a \"first-rate\", we should do so universally. Apparently that is not acceptable either.  +++$+++ :*Hi Shem & Rif, that was my feeling too, so imagine my surprise when I clicked on one of the links in an article, where the term was "first rate", only to see the click being redirected to "Frst-rate" as the title of the Wikipedia article about "First Rates". I figured, all right, if we are going to be wrong, let's at least be consistently wrong. If we are going to call a First Rate a "first-rate", we should do so universally. Apparently that is not acceptable either. [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 23:11, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
10936 +++$+++ Rif Winfield +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10933 +++$+++ 10933 +++$+++ 2010-06-17 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.276783500E09 +++$+++ I have always been concerned about those item headings, as extremely misleading. The hyphens should be removed, and the \"R\" capitalised for each article on a Rate.  +++$+++ *I have always been concerned about those item headings, as extremely misleading. The hyphens should be removed, and the "R" capitalised for each article on a Rate. [[User:Rif Winfield|Rif Winfield]] ([[User talk:Rif Winfield|talk]]) 07:05, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
10937 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10933 +++$+++ 10933 +++$+++ 2010-06-17 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.276799460E09 +++$+++ Although we disagree about the capitalisation, we're at one on the article names - when we've finished talking about capitalisation (Acad - have a look at [[Talk:First-rate]]), then we can move the article to the un-hyphenated name (\"First rate\").  However, the use of \"first-rate\" as an adjective is well established - for example, \"first-rate ship-of-the-line\" and \"fifth-rate frigate\" are clear adjectival uses of the words, and need a hyphen for clarity.  Aware this could drag on ...  +++$+++ :Although we disagree about the capitalisation, we're at one on the article names - when we've finished talking about capitalisation (Acad - have a look at [[Talk:First-rate]]), then we can move the article to the un-hyphenated name ("First rate").  However, the use of "first-rate" as an adjective is well established - for example, "first-rate ship-of-the-line" and "fifth-rate frigate" are clear adjectival uses of the words, and need a hyphen for clarity.  Aware this could drag on ... [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 11:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

273078 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273078 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-02 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.162476180E09 +++$+++ GM is being very disruptive on the [[History of the name Azerbaijan]] talk page. He purposely ignores what I write, does not respond to anything I say directly, and keeps diverting the discussion and making it go in circles. I dont know what else to do, both him and Ulvi are being very disruptive. Their actions include ignoring what I write, not answering my replies, not answering my questions, and bringing up the same issues over and over again, claiming I have not answered them when the writing is there for everyone to see (I have responded to their repetitive comments time and time again, yet what do I get from them? Nothing but ignoring, they dont even bother to read my posts, atleast thats what it seems like). I dont know what else to do, honestly. Any suggestions? I'm going to bed now, good night. +++$+++ GM is being very disruptive on the [[History of the name Azerbaijan]] talk page. He purposely ignores what I write, does not respond to anything I say directly, and keeps diverting the discussion and making it go in circles. I dont know what else to do, both him and Ulvi are being very disruptive. Their actions include ignoring what I write, not answering my replies, not answering my questions, and bringing up the same issues over and over again, claiming I have not answered them when the writing is there for everyone to see (I have responded to their repetitive comments time and time again, yet what do I get from them? Nothing but ignoring, they dont even bother to read my posts, atleast thats what it seems like). I dont know what else to do, honestly. Any suggestions? I'm going to bed now, good night.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 06:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
273079 +++$+++ Grandmaster +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273078 +++$+++ 273078 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.162476720E09 +++$+++ I simply want to receive a reasonable answer to my question why he deleted the quote from Iranica. Also, Khosrow removed the edits that were agreed between me and Ali, and Ali suggested to restore them, but Khosrow does not seem to be listening to other people's opinions. And Sarah, I would appreciate your comment on Azerbaijani people discussion. Khosrow failed to provide any references to support his claims, so what do we do now?  +++$+++ : I simply want to receive a reasonable answer to my question why he deleted the quote from Iranica. Also, Khosrow removed the edits that were agreed between me and Ali, and Ali suggested to restore them, but Khosrow does not seem to be listening to other people's opinions. And Sarah, I would appreciate your comment on Azerbaijani people discussion. Khosrow failed to provide any references to support his claims, so what do we do now? [[User:Grandmaster|Grandmaster]] 06:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
273080 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273078 +++$+++ 273079 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.162517040E09 +++$+++ I have repeatedly answered you, but you ignore what I write. This is evident in the discussion page Sarah created and its evident on the history of the name Azerbaijan article as well. Also, right after I proved Ulvi wrong using his very same source, he just left. And now, you refuse to respond to any of my posts, and you keep making the discussion go in circles. I have answered you plenty of times, and I'm not going to waste my time doing it again, you can re read the discussion page. +++$+++ ::I have repeatedly answered you, but you ignore what I write. This is evident in the discussion page Sarah created and its evident on the history of the name Azerbaijan article as well. Also, right after I proved Ulvi wrong using his very same source, he just left. And now, you refuse to respond to any of my posts, and you keep making the discussion go in circles. I have answered you plenty of times, and I'm not going to waste my time doing it again, you can re read the discussion page.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 17:24, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

535223 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-14 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.155624420E09 +++$+++ Anyway, the search for the mysterious van was quite short, as I began with the, as it was revealed, right assumption that it is a TAU'''N'''US Transit (probably a reference to the popular [[Ford Taunus]] made by Ford in Cologne). I am not going to be a smartass and boast about the knowledge I have just acquired from a website, but you just have to take a look at the [[:de:Ford Transit|German Ford Transit article]] to find out that the history of that nameplate started one generation earlier than the English (and apparently UK-oriented) article would lead us to believe. Apparently the British equivalent would be the forward-control Ford Thames 400E, but it isn't covered by the English WP either. So, if you'd have some spare time (I can help with my rudimentary German after I am finished with the Vedette, provided I will survive). Regards,  +++$+++ Anyway, the search for the mysterious van was quite short, as I began with the, as it was revealed, right assumption that it is a TAU'''N'''US Transit (probably a reference to the popular [[Ford Taunus]] made by Ford in Cologne). I am not going to be a smartass and boast about the knowledge I have just acquired from a website, but you just have to take a look at the [[:de:Ford Transit|German Ford Transit article]] to find out that the history of that nameplate started one generation earlier than the English (and apparently UK-oriented) article would lead us to believe. Apparently the British equivalent would be the forward-control Ford Thames 400E, but it isn't covered by the English WP either. So, if you'd have some spare time (I can help with my rudimentary German after I am finished with the Vedette, provided I will survive). Regards, [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 23:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
535224 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535223 +++$+++ 535223 +++$+++ 2006-08-15 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.155632520E09 +++$+++ Looks like a normal Fiat Dino Coup\xe9 to me. Check [http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20050401064203\/www.carsfromitaly.com\/fiat\/index.html this page] - the photo is almost identical (perhaps even the same car). The Coup\xe9 was built by Bertone, this is why it might not bear an obvious Fiat badge. If that's what you ask about. Have a good night,  +++$+++ :Looks like a normal Fiat Dino Coupé to me. Check [http://web.archive.org/web/20050401064203/www.carsfromitaly.com/fiat/index.html this page] - the photo is almost identical (perhaps even the same car). The Coupé was built by Bertone, this is why it might not bear an obvious Fiat badge. If that's what you ask about. Have a good night, [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 02:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

273081 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-02 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.162497000E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah. A rangeblock was my next step but I see you stepped in when I went for coffee :) Top stuff. --  +++$+++ Thanks Sarah. A rangeblock was my next step but I see you stepped in when I went for coffee :) Top stuff. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 11:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
273082 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273081 +++$+++ 273081 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.162497540E09 +++$+++ It's been a while since I've done a rangeblock myself, but there's only one way to find out if it worked hey :) This editor can't keep quiet for long. If they resurface, we ''try again'' :) --  +++$+++ :It's been a while since I've done a rangeblock myself, but there's only one way to find out if it worked hey :) This editor can't keep quiet for long. If they resurface, we ''try again'' :) -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 11:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
273083 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273081 +++$+++ 273082 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.162500180E09 +++$+++ Assuming the Mediawiki code to allow blocked ip's to register an account actually works, all should be fine. We're doing all we can at the moment to protect Wikipedia from harm. The Telco concerned must ultimately act in the best interests of ''their'' customers if they don't want the disruption to their userbase. Sadly, some Telco's choose not to care. --  +++$+++ ::Assuming the Mediawiki code to allow blocked ip's to register an account actually works, all should be fine. We're doing all we can at the moment to protect Wikipedia from harm. The Telco concerned must ultimately act in the best interests of ''their'' customers if they don't want the disruption to their userbase. Sadly, some Telco's choose not to care. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 12:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

10938 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-17 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.276839120E09 +++$+++ Acad, seeing as you're now changing \"[[fifth-rate]] [[sailing frigate|frigate]]\" to \"[[fifth-rate]]\", could you go the whole hog and change the adjective \"[[fifth-rate]]\" to the noun \"[[fifth rate]]\"?  I suggest it might be better in the case of frigates to use \"frigate\" rather than \"fifth rate\", as it is perhaps more accessible. If in doubt, ask Rif ...  Yours,  +++$+++ Acad, seeing as you're now changing "[[fifth-rate]] [[sailing frigate|frigate]]" to "[[fifth-rate]]", could you go the whole hog and change the adjective "[[fifth-rate]]" to the noun "[[fifth rate]]"?  I suggest it might be better in the case of frigates to use "frigate" rather than "fifth rate", as it is perhaps more accessible. If in doubt, ask Rif ...  Yours, [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 22:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
10939 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10938 +++$+++ 10938 +++$+++ 2010-06-18 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.276852620E09 +++$+++ Shem, will do re the noun vs adjective form. What I am trying to do with the \"fifth rate\" vs frigate route is to make sure that both are in the article. I still will keep the Rate, probably earlier in the article than the frigate, to encourage people who don't know what a to go to the Rate article. That way they will learn something more. Regards,  +++$+++ :Shem, will do re the noun vs adjective form. What I am trying to do with the "fifth rate" vs frigate route is to make sure that both are in the article. I still will keep the Rate, probably earlier in the article than the frigate, to encourage people who don't know what a to go to the Rate article. That way they will learn something more. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 02:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
10940 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10938 +++$+++ 10939 +++$+++ 2010-06-18 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.276874880E09 +++$+++ Acad, great - I thought I could see this happening.  Good luck.   +++$+++ ::Acad, great - I thought I could see this happening.  Good luck.  [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 08:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
10941 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10938 +++$+++ 10940 +++$+++ 2010-06-18 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.276885320E09 +++$+++ Shem, we are all trying to make Wikipedia a better encylopedia; we just disagree sometimes on how. That said, when I find the Rate correct (i.e., in caps), I will leave it for now. When I find it hypenated, I will remove the hyphen.  Regards,  +++$+++ :::Shem, we are all trying to make Wikipedia a better encylopedia; we just disagree sometimes on how. That said, when I find the Rate correct (i.e., in caps), I will leave it for now. When I find it hypenated, I will remove the hyphen.  Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 11:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
10942 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10938 +++$+++ 10941 +++$+++ 2010-06-18 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.276904520E09 +++$+++ Acad, I understand entirely.  I'm holding off making any sweeping changes at the moment, although our discussion seems to be attracting little interest!  I have just changed [[HMS Iris]], though, since some were in lower case and some in caps ... I did of course change them to the correct (ie lower) case!  One minor point which is worth noting, if you don't mind me pointing it out - [[Flower class corvette|Flower-class corvette]] doesn't take italics, since there was no HMS ''Flower'' (instead the common theme is flower names).  It's the same with River-class frigate, Town-class destroyer, and so on.  Yours,  +++$+++ ::::Acad, I understand entirely.  I'm holding off making any sweeping changes at the moment, although our discussion seems to be attracting little interest!  I have just changed [[HMS Iris]], though, since some were in lower case and some in caps ... I did of course change them to the correct (ie lower) case!  One minor point which is worth noting, if you don't mind me pointing it out - [[Flower class corvette|Flower-class corvette]] doesn't take italics, since there was no HMS ''Flower'' (instead the common theme is flower names).  It's the same with River-class frigate, Town-class destroyer, and so on.  Yours, [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 16:42, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
10943 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10938 +++$+++ 10942 +++$+++ 2010-06-18 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.276907700E09 +++$+++ Hi Shem, re Flower - good to know. Shows what happens when one blindly assumes. As for caps vs. lower case, I suspect that there are only 3-4 people in the whole world who care, and that the group that cares about Age of Sail warships and their history is not much larger. Doesn't stop me from continuing, but it is sobering. Regards,  +++$+++ :::::Hi Shem, re Flower - good to know. Shows what happens when one blindly assumes. As for caps vs. lower case, I suspect that there are only 3-4 people in the whole world who care, and that the group that cares about Age of Sail warships and their history is not much larger. Doesn't stop me from continuing, but it is sobering. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 17:35, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
10944 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10938 +++$+++ 10943 +++$+++ 2010-06-18 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.276914480E09 +++$+++ Acad, I see we have one fairly ambiguous comment at [[Talk:First-rate]], dealing with hyphenation, which is one of the things we agree on, if memory serves.  Any advance on 4 people who care?   +++$+++ ::::::Acad, I see we have one fairly ambiguous comment at [[Talk:First-rate]], dealing with hyphenation, which is one of the things we agree on, if memory serves.  Any advance on 4 people who care?  [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 19:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

273084 +++$+++ Golden Wattle +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-02 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.162523220E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your efforts also Sarah  -- +++$+++ Many thanks for your efforts also Sarah  --[[User:Golden Wattle|Golden Wattle ]] <sup>[[User_talk:Golden Wattle|talk]]</sup> 19:07, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
273085 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273084 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.162524180E09 +++$+++ It's a shame the block doesn't block them from editing there IP talk page. :( They have been ranting, copy and pasting [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:203.54.9.164&curid=7317889&action=history]. Is it possible to see whether the IP for [[User:Gretaw|Gretaw]] is the same as the Anon's as they are claiming not to be Gretaw? --  +++$+++ ::It's a shame the block doesn't block them from editing there IP talk page. :( They have been ranting, copy and pasting [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:203.54.9.164&curid=7317889&action=history]. Is it possible to see whether the IP for [[User:Gretaw|Gretaw]] is the same as the Anon's as they are claiming not to be Gretaw? -- [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] 19:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
273086 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273084 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-04 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.162648140E09 +++$+++ The checkuser case turned out Inconclusive. The Anon is back [[User:203.54.9.87|203.54.9.87]] and I have removed two comments so far that have nothing to do with the article [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Gundagai%2C_New_South_Wales&action=history]. --  +++$+++ ::The checkuser case turned out Inconclusive. The Anon is back [[User:203.54.9.87|203.54.9.87]] and I have removed two comments so far that have nothing to do with the article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gundagai%2C_New_South_Wales&action=history]. -- [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] 05:49, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
273087 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273084 +++$+++ 273084 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.162503240E09 +++$+++ Again, '''''thanks'''''; <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ :Again, '''''thanks'''''; <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="blue">OzLawyer</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 13:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

535230 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-25 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.156566180E09 +++$+++ I guess because of its domestic-only focus, there is little info on Barreiros itself and the models produced there available for non-Spanish speakers. I have found two sites - one for the 180 itself, http:\/\/www.chrysler-180.es.vg\/ and one for another interesting, Spain-only model, the majestic Dodge 3700 (Dart in disguise, but with a really nice wheel pattern) http:\/\/www.comunidadodge.es.vg\/ (though I believe some better ones can be found). I was wondering whether you would be interested in helping share the history of Barreiros and the oddball Chryslers with the English-speaking Wikipedia community after you come back from the Wikibreak. Cheers!  +++$+++ I guess because of its domestic-only focus, there is little info on Barreiros itself and the models produced there available for non-Spanish speakers. I have found two sites - one for the 180 itself, http://www.chrysler-180.es.vg/ and one for another interesting, Spain-only model, the majestic Dodge 3700 (Dart in disguise, but with a really nice wheel pattern) http://www.comunidadodge.es.vg/ (though I believe some better ones can be found). I was wondering whether you would be interested in helping share the history of Barreiros and the oddball Chryslers with the English-speaking Wikipedia community after you come back from the Wikibreak. Cheers! [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 21:23, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
535231 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535230 +++$+++ 535230 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.156576080E09 +++$+++ Yes, I remember to have played with a Dodge Barreiros toy car when I was little. I'm in Spain till next Monday. Funnily enough, I thought about the Barreiros a while back. I will take care of this once I get back home. Cheers, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Yes, I remember to have played with a Dodge Barreiros toy car when I was little. I'm in Spain till next Monday. Funnily enough, I thought about the Barreiros a while back. I will take care of this once I get back home. Cheers, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 00:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
535232 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535230 +++$+++ 535231 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.156577220E09 +++$+++ Have a great time, and look out for Simcas, Dodges and Chryslers when carrying a camera :D God, do I envy you. The toy car I remember the most from my childhood was the blue Skoda Estelle :D :D :D It even had a mock-up of the engine in the rear! I actually wonder whether it would be somewhere around the home now...  +++$+++ ::Have a great time, and look out for Simcas, Dodges and Chryslers when carrying a camera :D God, do I envy you. The toy car I remember the most from my childhood was the blue Skoda Estelle :D :D :D It even had a mock-up of the engine in the rear! I actually wonder whether it would be somewhere around the home now... [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 00:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
535233 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535230 +++$+++ 535232 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.156579020E09 +++$+++ Damn EU-financed ''Plan Prever'' killed off so many classic cars that makes me go mental (basically, the government would contribute up to 1500 euros towards a new car as long as you scrap one older than 8 years). I saw a SEAT 124 this morning and could not help but smiling like a child. I will keep an eye open for Simcas and Chryslers\/Talbots. Dodges are a no-go for sure :( [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::Damn EU-financed ''Plan Prever'' killed off so many classic cars that makes me go mental (basically, the government would contribute up to 1500 euros towards a new car as long as you scrap one older than 8 years). I saw a SEAT 124 this morning and could not help but smiling like a child. I will keep an eye open for Simcas and Chryslers/Talbots. Dodges are a no-go for sure :( [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 00:57, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
535234 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535230 +++$+++ 535233 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.156579380E09 +++$+++ I guessed so :( Though there seem to be enthusiast clubs that keep survivors going for sure - I guess we would have to mail them for some good photos (where \"we\" stands for \"the one of us who speaks Spanish :p). Anyway, enjoy your holiday at home and we'll come back to that whenever you'll have time :D  +++$+++ ::::I guessed so :( Though there seem to be enthusiast clubs that keep survivors going for sure - I guess we would have to mail them for some good photos (where "we" stands for "the one of us who speaks Spanish :p). Anyway, enjoy your holiday at home and we'll come back to that whenever you'll have time :D [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 01:03, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

613493 +++$+++ Jjron +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-23 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.232721780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that information (not sure how you came across that discussion so long after the FPC closure!). You mention as a source Desmond and Moore - is that their excellent Darwin bio from the early 90s? If so I have that book, but don't think I actually checked it out for info on that photographer at the time of the nom, though at the time I did have a look in there for any relevant images that may have confirmed\/denied the likely date. Cheers, -- +++$+++ Thanks for that information (not sure how you came across that discussion so long after the FPC closure!). You mention as a source Desmond and Moore - is that their excellent Darwin bio from the early 90s? If so I have that book, but don't think I actually checked it out for info on that photographer at the time of the nom, though at the time I did have a look in there for any relevant images that may have confirmed/denied the likely date. Cheers, --[[User:Jjron|jjron]] ([[User talk:Jjron|talk]]) 06:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
613494 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613493 +++$+++ 613493 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.232730780E09 +++$+++ Yes, it's that excellent bio. See your [[User talk:Jjron|talk]] for further info. .  +++$+++ :Yes, it's that excellent bio. See your [[User talk:Jjron|talk]] for further info. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
613495 +++$+++ Jjron +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613493 +++$+++ 613494 +++$+++ 2009-02-07 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.234046820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the further information. I'll have to have a read of the van Wyhe article. I had been fairly convinced about Darwin's delay, but haven't read much on it for some years. I was a big fan of Stephen Jay Gould's writing (well still am I guess), and I think he alluded to the delay a number of times as well. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the further information. I'll have to have a read of the van Wyhe article. I had been fairly convinced about Darwin's delay, but haven't read much on it for some years. I was a big fan of Stephen Jay Gould's writing (well still am I guess), and I think he alluded to the delay a number of times as well. --[[User:Jjron|jjron]] ([[User talk:Jjron|talk]]) 14:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

10945 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10945 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-19 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.276996920E09 +++$+++ Acad, take care.  In [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=HMS_Ethalion_(1797)&action=historysubmit&diff=369020442&oldid=369016931 this edit] you reverted [[User:Benea]] <u>after<\/u> he had written on the [[Talk:First-rate]] page that he thought you were making an error in removing \"fifth-rate frigate\", '''and''' you ignored his edit summary, which said the same thing.  Benea is a deeply experienced editor, and a frequent contributor to WikiShips; I bow to his wisdom frequently.  Please discuss the issue with him before reverting him.  Yours,  +++$+++ Acad, take care.  In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Ethalion_(1797)&action=historysubmit&diff=369020442&oldid=369016931 this edit] you reverted [[User:Benea]] <u>after</u> he had written on the [[Talk:First-rate]] page that he thought you were making an error in removing "fifth-rate frigate", '''and''' you ignored his edit summary, which said the same thing.  Benea is a deeply experienced editor, and a frequent contributor to WikiShips; I bow to his wisdom frequently.  Please discuss the issue with him before reverting him.  Yours, [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 18:22, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
10946 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10945 +++$+++ 10945 +++$+++ 2010-06-19 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.277003040E09 +++$+++ Damn. I didn't notice. That said, I don't fully agree with him.  +++$+++ :Damn. I didn't notice. That said, I don't fully agree with him. [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 20:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

10947 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-22 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.277253540E09 +++$+++ Acad, I think you make a good point when you say proofing each other's work is time well spent.  May I suggest that we co-operate in a meaningful way on this?  I suggest that we set up a page at [[User:Shem1805\/Proof readings]], and that under each other's names we occasionally insert the names of articles ready for proof reading.  You would need to watch the page, and please bear in mind that my job takes me away for long periods at a time, but it could work.  I use a similar system with [[User:Benea\/Shiplist pages]] to suggest shiplist pages for Benea to do when he sees fit.  I would also be very happy to run up navboxes, provide pictures, etc.  Let me know how you feel, and I'll set up the page accordingly.  While I'm here, am I right in supposing that you have Rif's ''British Warships in the Age of Sail''?  Do you have any other \"Winfields\" or indeed, Colledge? Yours, as ever,  +++$+++ Acad, I think you make a good point when you say proofing each other's work is time well spent.  May I suggest that we co-operate in a meaningful way on this?  I suggest that we set up a page at [[User:Shem1805/Proof readings]], and that under each other's names we occasionally insert the names of articles ready for proof reading.  You would need to watch the page, and please bear in mind that my job takes me away for long periods at a time, but it could work.  I use a similar system with [[User:Benea/Shiplist pages]] to suggest shiplist pages for Benea to do when he sees fit.  I would also be very happy to run up navboxes, provide pictures, etc.  Let me know how you feel, and I'll set up the page accordingly.  While I'm here, am I right in supposing that you have Rif's ''British Warships in the Age of Sail''?  Do you have any other "Winfields" or indeed, Colledge? Yours, as ever, [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 17:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
10948 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10947 +++$+++ 10947 +++$+++ 2010-06-23 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.277330880E09 +++$+++ Hi Shem, Sounds worth a try. I do have the Winfield (1793-1817), and most (not all) of Colledge is online. I would suggest setting up the page as simple as possible. Then whoever is looking under their name can access the article and see what they can contribute, be it editing, shipboxes, or images. That said, I am just now fiddling while I wait to head off to the airport. I will be back on line after the first week of July. Regards  +++$+++ :Hi Shem, Sounds worth a try. I do have the Winfield (1793-1817), and most (not all) of Colledge is online. I would suggest setting up the page as simple as possible. Then whoever is looking under their name can access the article and see what they can contribute, be it editing, shipboxes, or images. That said, I am just now fiddling while I wait to head off to the airport. I will be back on line after the first week of July. Regards [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 15:08, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
10949 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10947 +++$+++ 10948 +++$+++ 2010-06-23 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.277346720E09 +++$+++ And I'll be away after the first week of July!  I'll set up the page (I'll put a couple of examples on there too), and you can make whatever changes or additions you think best.  I look forward to hearing from you, whenever that is.  Yours,  +++$+++ ::And I'll be away after the first week of July!  I'll set up the page (I'll put a couple of examples on there too), and you can make whatever changes or additions you think best.  I look forward to hearing from you, whenever that is.  Yours, [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 19:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

122571 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ 122571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-21 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.258868280E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I noticed a few of your edits that added a capitalized defaultsort using AWB. I haven't used AWB in a while - is this a standard feature now or is this a special regex or code you use? I note that adding such capitalized defaultsorts isn't really supported by guidelines or policy. In fact, I think it was removed from [[WP:CAT]] as it had been disputed. I'm of the opinion that they're unnecessary on species-titled articles as only other species in those articles will get sorted next to each other in categories. And currently the system of some articles with capitalized defaultsorts and some without has made for a lot of messy categories. I approached [[User:Rich Farmbrough]] with this, but only got one response and no further discussion. Do you have any strong opinions on this matter? It's unfortunate what a mess things are right now. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi there. I noticed a few of your edits that added a capitalized defaultsort using AWB. I haven't used AWB in a while - is this a standard feature now or is this a special regex or code you use? I note that adding such capitalized defaultsorts isn't really supported by guidelines or policy. In fact, I think it was removed from [[WP:CAT]] as it had been disputed. I'm of the opinion that they're unnecessary on species-titled articles as only other species in those articles will get sorted next to each other in categories. And currently the system of some articles with capitalized defaultsorts and some without has made for a lot of messy categories. I approached [[User:Rich Farmbrough]] with this, but only got one response and no further discussion. Do you have any strong opinions on this matter? It's unfortunate what a mess things are right now. Cheers, [[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 21:38, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
122572 +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ 122571 +++$+++ 122571 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.258913940E09 +++$+++ Rkitko: it is a built-in AWB thing. If it is disputed, then it should be removed and the place to bring this up is [[Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser]] or possibly [[Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser\/Bugs]].  +++$+++ :Rkitko: it is a built-in AWB thing. If it is disputed, then it should be removed and the place to bring this up is [[Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser]] or possibly [[Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs]]. [[User:Gaius Cornelius|Gaius Cornelius]] ([[User talk:Gaius Cornelius#top|talk]]) 10:19, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

273097 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-07 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.162932900E09 +++$+++ Thanks, as always, for keeping an eye out there. -- +++$+++ Thanks, as always, for keeping an eye out there. --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 12:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
273098 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273097 +++$+++ 273097 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.162933860E09 +++$+++ And thanks too for answering the user's question for him. -- +++$+++ :And thanks too for answering the user's question for him. --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 13:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
273099 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273097 +++$+++ 273098 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.162940700E09 +++$+++ It's so cute how you talk to your sock like that Guinnog... or how your sock talks to you, Sarah... whichever... :) if you gave it up you wouldn't have to do all this double talk page maintenance though.! ++ +++$+++ ::It's so cute how you talk to your sock like that Guinnog... or how your sock talks to you, Sarah... whichever... :) if you gave it up you wouldn't have to do all this double talk page maintenance though.! ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 15:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

10955 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-22 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.285212600E09 +++$+++ Acad,<br>I note from my work on copyediting the [[Cruizer class brig-sloop|''Cruizer''-class brig-sloops]] that much of the text is lifted word-for-word from [http:\/\/www.ageofnelson.org\/MichaelPhillips\/index.html|the Age of Nelson website].  Please reassure me that you know something I don't about the source of the text - for example that Michael Phillips lifted it word-for-word from a public domain source, such as William James.  +++$+++ Acad,<br>I note from my work on copyediting the [[Cruizer class brig-sloop|''Cruizer''-class brig-sloops]] that much of the text is lifted word-for-word from [http://www.ageofnelson.org/MichaelPhillips/index.html|the Age of Nelson website].  Please reassure me that you know something I don't about the source of the text - for example that Michael Phillips lifted it word-for-word from a public domain source, such as William James. [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 20:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
10956 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10955 +++$+++ 10955 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.285213860E09 +++$+++ Hi Shem, when I looked for info I found that Michael Phillips had used James extensively, but also The Naval Chronicle and other such sources, usually without changing any wording. Often I found the James material via pbenyon's Naval Database. Occasionally I would bypass both pbenyon and Phillips to the original source, and often I didn't bother. What I did source was things I found only in one place such as books I found via Google books. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Shem, when I looked for info I found that Michael Phillips had used James extensively, but also The Naval Chronicle and other such sources, usually without changing any wording. Often I found the James material via pbenyon's Naval Database. Occasionally I would bypass both pbenyon and Phillips to the original source, and often I didn't bother. What I did source was things I found only in one place such as books I found via Google books. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 20:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
10957 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10955 +++$+++ 10956 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.285214400E09 +++$+++ Acad, we need to be ''really'' careful here.  I don't know if you've noticed the mass blanking task in the wake of [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations\/Darius Dhlomo|Darius Dhlomo's copyright infringement]], but in essence they are effectively deleting 10,000 articles that he had anything to do with.  The problem is not that he copied stuff every time, but that he copied stuff sometimes, and therefore they've decided they have to delete everything he touched, more or less.  If you've been copying Phillips, then potentially you're in the same situation - who can say (even you) where you've copied non-free text, and where you haven't?  I need to think a lot more about this, but in the meantime, please be scrupulous about not copying text unless it can be shown to be public domain - and if you do that, then reference it clearly to the public domain text.  Enough said for the time being, though.   +++$+++ ::Acad, we need to be ''really'' careful here.  I don't know if you've noticed the mass blanking task in the wake of [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Darius Dhlomo|Darius Dhlomo's copyright infringement]], but in essence they are effectively deleting 10,000 articles that he had anything to do with.  The problem is not that he copied stuff every time, but that he copied stuff sometimes, and therefore they've decided they have to delete everything he touched, more or less.  If you've been copying Phillips, then potentially you're in the same situation - who can say (even you) where you've copied non-free text, and where you haven't?  I need to think a lot more about this, but in the meantime, please be scrupulous about not copying text unless it can be shown to be public domain - and if you do that, then reference it clearly to the public domain text.  Enough said for the time being, though.  [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 21:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
10958 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10955 +++$+++ 10957 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.285214820E09 +++$+++ Hi Shem, Roger wilco. I will start going back over the articles to see where I can find non-Phillips sources. Regards,  +++$+++ :::Hi Shem, Roger wilco. I will start going back over the articles to see where I can find non-Phillips sources. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 21:07, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
10959 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10955 +++$+++ 10958 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.285304220E09 +++$+++ Acad, I'd like to move this discussion to [[User_talk:Acad Ronin\/Copyright]], becasue I'm likely to take up a lot of space with quotes.  Happy?  +++$+++ ::::Acad, I'd like to move this discussion to [[User_talk:Acad Ronin/Copyright]], becasue I'm likely to take up a lot of space with quotes.  Happy? [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 21:57, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
10960 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10955 +++$+++ 10959 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.285308300E09 +++$+++ Sure.  +++$+++ :::::Sure. [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 23:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

273100 +++$+++ Ottawaman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-07 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.162961340E09 +++$+++ A  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/Sarah_Ewart conduct dispute] has been raised against you.  +++$+++ A  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Sarah_Ewart conduct dispute] has been raised against you. [[User:Ottawaman|ottawaman]] 20:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
273101 +++$+++ Thatcher131 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273100 +++$+++ 273100 +++$+++ 2006-11-08 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.163018700E09 +++$+++ And summarily deleted as certified by an abusive sockpuppet. Cheers.  +++$+++ :And summarily deleted as certified by an abusive sockpuppet. Cheers. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 12:45, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

526114 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526114 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-27 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.154002680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for blocking {{IPvandal|130.216.191.84}} after the string of votes on [[:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Akshay|AFD]].   &mdash;  +++$+++ Thanks for blocking {{IPvandal|130.216.191.84}} after the string of votes on [[:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akshay|AFD]].   &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 05:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
526115 +++$+++ Royboycrashfan +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526114 +++$+++ 526114 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.154002800E09 +++$+++ No problem.  +++$+++ *No problem. [[User:Royboycrashfan|Roy]] [[User talk:Royboycrashfan|A]].[[Special:Contributions/Royboycrashfan|A]]. 05:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

535248 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-28 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.156825560E09 +++$+++ What kind of work do you have that you can do photoediting stuff while \"on duty\"? ;) When you're finished with the Seville photos, you might consider helping me upload all the goodies from the garage de'l Est to the Commons and insert them to their respective articles :D I also have to figure out where to get a nice Fiat 130 photo from... I have also dumped a lot of stuff to the [[Chrysler 180]] article, but I guess I turned it into a pile of rubbish...  +++$+++ What kind of work do you have that you can do photoediting stuff while "on duty"? ;) When you're finished with the Seville photos, you might consider helping me upload all the goodies from the garage de'l Est to the Commons and insert them to their respective articles :D I also have to figure out where to get a nice Fiat 130 photo from... I have also dumped a lot of stuff to the [[Chrysler 180]] article, but I guess I turned it into a pile of rubbish... [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 21:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
535249 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535248 +++$+++ 535248 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.157230980E09 +++$+++ Hi! I was just wondering whether you have had some time to think about the Chrysler 180 thing - does it pop out sometimes when you press the \"random\" button? :D Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi! I was just wondering whether you have had some time to think about the Chrysler 180 thing - does it pop out sometimes when you press the "random" button? :D Cheers, [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 14:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

10962 +++$+++ Yoninah +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-17 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.287331440E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[USS Elcano (PG-38)]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|USS Elcano (PG-38)|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[USS Elcano (PG-38)]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|USS Elcano (PG-38)|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 09:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
10963 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10962 +++$+++ 10962 +++$+++ 2010-10-17 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.287347820E09 +++$+++ DANFS is online, so {{tl|cite web}} is one that could be used. All you need is four basic parameters <nowiki>{{cite web|url=|title=|publisher=|accessdate=}}<\/nowiki>.  +++$+++ :DANFS is online, so {{tl|cite web}} is one that could be used. All you need is four basic parameters <nowiki>{{cite web|url=|title=|publisher=|accessdate=}}</nowiki>. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 13:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
10964 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10962 +++$+++ 10963 +++$+++ 2010-10-17 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.287347880E09 +++$+++ {{tl|cite DANFS}} could also be used.  +++$+++ ::{{tl|cite DANFS}} could also be used. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 13:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

535252 +++$+++ Ecemaml +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535252 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.156880160E09 +++$+++ Hola Asterion, no s\xe9 si hemos coincidido en esta wikipedia alguna vez. Soy ecemaml, administrador en [[:es:]] y en el pasado un activo contribuidor al art\xedculo [[History of Gibraltar]]. Consegu\xed el bloqueo de [[User:Gibraltarian]] (bueno, m\xe1s bien se bloque\xf3 el solito) y posteriormente no volv\xed al asunto (bastantes tareas tengo ya en [[:es:]]). Pas\xe9 ayer por el art\xedculo y vi que alguno de los sockpuppets de Gibraltarian ha introducido algunos sutiles POVs (planteando el punto de vista brit\xe1nico como si fuese la verdad) y eliminando algunos datos con su correspondiente fuente (hasta a la Biblioteca Nacional me fui para conseguir fuentes). Estoy pensando en restaurar los puntos borrados y neutralizar los puntos de vista brit\xe1nicos (identific\xe1ndolos como tales), pero no tengo ganas de que haya otra eterna e improductiva guerra de ediciones. \xbfAlguna idea? Muchas gracias y un saludo -- +++$+++ Hola Asterion, no sé si hemos coincidido en esta wikipedia alguna vez. Soy ecemaml, administrador en [[:es:]] y en el pasado un activo contribuidor al artículo [[History of Gibraltar]]. Conseguí el bloqueo de [[User:Gibraltarian]] (bueno, más bien se bloqueó el solito) y posteriormente no volví al asunto (bastantes tareas tengo ya en [[:es:]]). Pasé ayer por el artículo y vi que alguno de los sockpuppets de Gibraltarian ha introducido algunos sutiles POVs (planteando el punto de vista británico como si fuese la verdad) y eliminando algunos datos con su correspondiente fuente (hasta a la Biblioteca Nacional me fui para conseguir fuentes). Estoy pensando en restaurar los puntos borrados y neutralizar los puntos de vista británicos (identificándolos como tales), pero no tengo ganas de que haya otra eterna e improductiva guerra de ediciones. ¿Alguna idea? Muchas gracias y un saludo --[[User:Ecemaml|Ecemaml]] 12:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
535253 +++$+++ Ecemaml +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535252 +++$+++ 535252 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.156882980E09 +++$+++ He localizado la edici\xf3n. Efectivamente fue de Gibraltarian, as\xed que he restaurado y ya est\xe1. Como podr\xe1s ver, todas las afirmaciones tienen su fuente, as\xed que no son una invenci\xf3n. Un saludo -- +++$+++ : He localizado la edición. Efectivamente fue de Gibraltarian, así que he restaurado y ya está. Como podrás ver, todas las afirmaciones tienen su fuente, así que no son una invención. Un saludo --[[User:Ecemaml|Ecemaml]] 13:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

10965 +++$+++ Angusmclellan +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-18 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.287426780E09 +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:HMS Brazen monument.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:HMS Brazen monument.JPG|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files\/2010 October 18#File:HMS Brazen monument.JPG|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> -- +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:HMS Brazen monument.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:HMS Brazen monument.JPG|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 October 18#File:HMS Brazen monument.JPG|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> --[[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]]  [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 11:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
10966 +++$+++ Angusmclellan +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10965 +++$+++ 10965 +++$+++ 2010-10-18 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.287469680E09 +++$+++ Just in case you are interested (which you probably aren't, in which case you can ignore this), regarding the difference between the various sorts of Creative Commons licenses, the ones listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags\/Deprecated#Non-free Creative Commons licenses]] aren't acceptable for Wikipedia. These are all of the ones which have \"NC\" or \"non-commercial\" and\/or \"ND\" or \"no-derivatives\" in their name. The ones which are OK for Wikipedia are listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags\/Free licenses#Creative Commons]]. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Just in case you are interested (which you probably aren't, in which case you can ignore this), regarding the difference between the various sorts of Creative Commons licenses, the ones listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Deprecated#Non-free Creative Commons licenses]] aren't acceptable for Wikipedia. These are all of the ones which have "NC" or "non-commercial" and/or "ND" or "no-derivatives" in their name. The ones which are OK for Wikipedia are listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses#Creative Commons]]. Cheers, [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]]  [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 23:28, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

535254 +++$+++ Jauntymcd +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.156899420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Jauntymcd|Jauntymcd]] 17:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
535255 +++$+++ Jauntymcd +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535254 +++$+++ 535254 +++$+++ 2006-09-03 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.157337600E09 +++$+++ Rather than going back and forth between our talk pages, I've added some additional info and a question re: the pd-demis thing to your edit of my user talk page.  I hope this works for you.  I don't know if you have a way of watching a particular 'edit' section of a talk page, so I thought I'd communicate what I've done to you here.  If there's a way of flagging something for your attention at its location, and this is something you'd like, please let me know. I think in the future I'll post questions on my talk page to keep everything in one place, and use the 'help' flag for answers from experienced users\/admin'ers generally, also with the purpose of not monopolizing your time particularly. But thanks in advance for your continued help on this particular question. +++$+++ :Rather than going back and forth between our talk pages, I've added some additional info and a question re: the pd-demis thing to your edit of my user talk page.  I hope this works for you.  I don't know if you have a way of watching a particular 'edit' section of a talk page, so I thought I'd communicate what I've done to you here.  If there's a way of flagging something for your attention at its location, and this is something you'd like, please let me know. I think in the future I'll post questions on my talk page to keep everything in one place, and use the 'help' flag for answers from experienced users/admin'ers generally, also with the purpose of not monopolizing your time particularly. But thanks in advance for your continued help on this particular question.[[User:Jauntymcd|Jauntymcd]] 19:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

535256 +++$+++ Bolivian Unicyclist +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.156913100E09 +++$+++ Gracias por el apoyo ofrecido. De hecho, seg\xfan una revisi\xf3n de la [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Guadalajara&action=history historia del asunto], hasta hace poco  [[Guadalajara]] s\xed era un rd a la ciudad mexicana. Lo cambi\xf3 el mismo anon y (dicho sea de paso) dej\xf3 un soberano desorden en los \"what links here\". Sin embargo, a m\xed me gustan las p\xe1ginas de disambig: de ah\xed mi \"neutral\" en Valencia. Esas decisiones de \"primary use\", \"clearly what most ppl will most probably be looking for\", etc. irremediablemente reflejan alg\xfan punto de vista; aqu\xed, un PdV que favorece lo angloamericano y lo europeo.  La verdad, prefiero tener [[Guadalajara]] como p\xe1gina dab, pero --eso s\xed-- en orden alfab\xe9tico o, como [[Boston (disambiguation)]], con alguna indicaci\xf3n de su importancia relativa. Vaya, mover [[Guadalajara, Jalisco]], a [[Guadalajara]] s\xf3lo provocar\xeda otras peleas est\xe9riles con los siguientes anons que lleguen: entonces, \xbfpara qu\xe9? Un saludo,  +++$+++ Gracias por el apoyo ofrecido. De hecho, según una revisión de la [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guadalajara&action=history historia del asunto], hasta hace poco  [[Guadalajara]] sí era un rd a la ciudad mexicana. Lo cambió el mismo anon y (dicho sea de paso) dejó un soberano desorden en los "what links here". Sin embargo, a mí me gustan las páginas de disambig: de ahí mi "neutral" en Valencia. Esas decisiones de "primary use", "clearly what most ppl will most probably be looking for", etc. irremediablemente reflejan algún punto de vista; aquí, un PdV que favorece lo angloamericano y lo europeo.  La verdad, prefiero tener [[Guadalajara]] como página dab, pero --eso sí-- en orden alfabético o, como [[Boston (disambiguation)]], con alguna indicación de su importancia relativa. Vaya, mover [[Guadalajara, Jalisco]], a [[Guadalajara]] sólo provocaría otras peleas estériles con los siguientes anons que lleguen: entonces, ¿para qué? Un saludo, [[User:Bolivian Unicyclist|Bolivian Unicyclist]] 21:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
535257 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535256 +++$+++ 535256 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.156914300E09 +++$+++ Tiene much\xedsima raz\xf3n. Respecto a las p\xe1ginas de disambig, yo tambi\xe9n comparto esa idea generalmente. Por ejemplo, [[Lincoln]] podr\xeda perfectamente desembocar en [[Abraham Lincoln]] pero el hecho de que da a una p\xe1gina dab le da mayor valor enciclop\xe9dico (el lector tiene la oportunidad de aumentar su conocimiento, por ejemplo enter\xe1ndose del origen etimol\xf3gico del t\xe9rmino). Respecto a Valencia, casi prefiero que se quede como un dab. Mi \xfanica preocupaci\xf3n es que llamar a Valencia (city), porque Valencia, Valencia no suena muy bien y si se elige el nombre de la [[comunidad aut\xf3noma|regi\xf3n]] en vez del de la provincia ([[Valencia, Land of Valencia]] o [[Valencia, Valencian Community]] o [[Valencia, Valencian Country]]), es casi como abrir la Caja de Pandora porque siempre habr\xe1 alguien disgustado. Saludos, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Tiene muchísima razón. Respecto a las páginas de disambig, yo también comparto esa idea generalmente. Por ejemplo, [[Lincoln]] podría perfectamente desembocar en [[Abraham Lincoln]] pero el hecho de que da a una página dab le da mayor valor enciclopédico (el lector tiene la oportunidad de aumentar su conocimiento, por ejemplo enterándose del origen etimológico del término). Respecto a Valencia, casi prefiero que se quede como un dab. Mi única preocupación es que llamar a Valencia (city), porque Valencia, Valencia no suena muy bien y si se elige el nombre de la [[comunidad autónoma|región]] en vez del de la provincia ([[Valencia, Land of Valencia]] o [[Valencia, Valencian Community]] o [[Valencia, Valencian Country]]), es casi como abrir la Caja de Pandora porque siempre habrá alguien disgustado. Saludos, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 22:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

535258 +++$+++ Reinoutr +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.157044200E09 +++$+++ Dear Editor, since you have been involved in editing the [[Kosovo]] article in the last months, and that article has been the subject of long ongoing edit wars, your name is listed in the [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration|Request for Arbitration]] on this matter. You can make a statement here: [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Kosovo]]. Due to the large number of editors involved, however, I would to ask you to keep your statement concise and to the point. If you feel you have not been substantially involved in the disputes surrounding the [[Kosovo]] article, please do not remove your name from the Arbitration request, but rather make a short statement there explaining why you feel you have not been involved enough to be part it. To understand my reasons for requesting Arbitration, please read my statement on the Requests for Arbitration page. Best regards,  +++$+++ Dear Editor, since you have been involved in editing the [[Kosovo]] article in the last months, and that article has been the subject of long ongoing edit wars, your name is listed in the [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration|Request for Arbitration]] on this matter. You can make a statement here: [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Kosovo]]. Due to the large number of editors involved, however, I would to ask you to keep your statement concise and to the point. If you feel you have not been substantially involved in the disputes surrounding the [[Kosovo]] article, please do not remove your name from the Arbitration request, but rather make a short statement there explaining why you feel you have not been involved enough to be part it. To understand my reasons for requesting Arbitration, please read my statement on the Requests for Arbitration page. Best regards, [[User:Reinoutr|Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr)]] 10:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
535259 +++$+++ Reinoutr +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535258 +++$+++ 535258 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.157080080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comment, Asterion. Although I missed your 'official' anouncement to stop editing [[Kosovo]], I figured that much since you were no longer active there. There is no need for everyone to make a statement at the AfD in this case, but I appreciate your explanation on my talk page. I got involved in the [[Kosovo]] article with the naive idea that I could mediate a solution, which obviously has proven impossible so far. If this AfD is rejected, I also will leave the article because it simply takes up so much time to keep repeating the same arguments over and over again and it all feels so useless, since no progress is made at all. If the ArbCom agrees and imposes some sort of restrictions on the article and possibly editors, I am willing to give it try to keep working on the article. But this really might be the last thing I am doing on that article. The Kosovo article is clearly one of the few examples where having a wiki as an encyclopedia leads to more trouble than to improvements. Thanks again for all the efforts you made, happy editing! -- +++$+++ :Thanks for your comment, Asterion. Although I missed your 'official' anouncement to stop editing [[Kosovo]], I figured that much since you were no longer active there. There is no need for everyone to make a statement at the AfD in this case, but I appreciate your explanation on my talk page. I got involved in the [[Kosovo]] article with the naive idea that I could mediate a solution, which obviously has proven impossible so far. If this AfD is rejected, I also will leave the article because it simply takes up so much time to keep repeating the same arguments over and over again and it all feels so useless, since no progress is made at all. If the ArbCom agrees and imposes some sort of restrictions on the article and possibly editors, I am willing to give it try to keep working on the article. But this really might be the last thing I am doing on that article. The Kosovo article is clearly one of the few examples where having a wiki as an encyclopedia leads to more trouble than to improvements. Thanks again for all the efforts you made, happy editing! --[[User:Reinoutr|Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr)]] 20:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
535260 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535258 +++$+++ 535258 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.157086200E09 +++$+++ I have already said to you before that the best you can do is to change your password and also remember to log off if you use a shared computer (eg. internet cafe, university, etc). I am not an admin so there is nothing else I can do from my position. Speak to [[User:Dijxtra]] if you need to. Regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :I have already said to you before that the best you can do is to change your password and also remember to log off if you use a shared computer (eg. internet cafe, university, etc). I am not an admin so there is nothing else I can do from my position. Speak to [[User:Dijxtra]] if you need to. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 21:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

10971 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-12 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.289628840E09 +++$+++ And thanks for the editing on HMS Falcon (1802) - it is interesting to see how pages develope!  If you have a greater interest in 1808 in Tun\xf8\/Endelave see the [http:\/\/www.youfreeweb.com\/falcon1808\/ link to the notes] I made on various English and Danish sources before I knew anything about Wikipedia.  I will be trying to dig deeper in Danish for anything on the Grinder, but the story so far seems to be exactly as it was - no official record of such a ship  +++$+++ And thanks for the editing on HMS Falcon (1802) - it is interesting to see how pages develope!  If you have a greater interest in 1808 in Tunø/Endelave see the [http://www.youfreeweb.com/falcon1808/ link to the notes] I made on various English and Danish sources before I knew anything about Wikipedia.  I will be trying to dig deeper in Danish for anything on the Grinder, but the story so far seems to be exactly as it was - no official record of such a ship [[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 22:14, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
10972 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10971 +++$+++ 10971 +++$+++ 2010-11-21 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.290377940E09 +++$+++ AR - Please check your private emails for something on GRINDER  +++$+++ : AR - Please check your private emails for something on GRINDER [[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 14:19, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

10973 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-29 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.291076280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 16:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
10974 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.294029720E09 +++$+++ Information via the Sailing Navies forum, extends our \"Black Register\" of Danish ships into a new book!  \"For those interested in the Danish navy, a new three book list of all Danish Naval Vessels from 1500 to date has just been published by the Danish State Defense Museum. it works out at around \xa330 \/ $50 for the 900 page set\" (plus tax of some \xa312). see [http:\/\/nyboderboghandel.dk\/soefart-36\/o%20...%20-1275.html order details here (in Danish)].  I have not seen it yet, but if you have access via a library we might yet have a good report on ''Prise Nr 5'' aka ''Grinder'' +++$+++ :: Information via the Sailing Navies forum, extends our "Black Register" of Danish ships into a new book!  "For those interested in the Danish navy, a new three book list of all Danish Naval Vessels from 1500 to date has just been published by the Danish State Defense Museum. it works out at around £30 / $50 for the 900 page set" (plus tax of some £12). see [http://nyboderboghandel.dk/soefart-36/o%20...%20-1275.html order details here (in Danish)].  I have not seen it yet, but if you have access via a library we might yet have a good report on ''Prise Nr 5'' aka ''Grinder''[[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 20:42, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

273118 +++$+++ Shyam Bihari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-11 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.163293920E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah Ewart, the edit war was not being started after the unprotection. So I do not think reprotection was required. Could the talk page be unprotected from semi-protection. I do not seek any harm in unprotection of the talk page.  +++$+++ Hi Sarah Ewart, the edit war was not being started after the unprotection. So I do not think reprotection was required. Could the talk page be unprotected from semi-protection. I do not seek any harm in unprotection of the talk page. [[User:Shyam Bihari| <font color="black">'''Shyam'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shyam Bihari|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Shyam Bihari|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 17:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
273119 +++$+++ Shyam Bihari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273118 +++$+++ 273118 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.163295420E09 +++$+++ Thanks Erwat for unprotecting the talk page. I was watching the page and as you unprotect the page, I reoved the tag. I think, there is no harm in doing so. After unprotection I added the page in my watchlist to revert vandalism, so I did not think it was really necessary to discuss with the admin that the user mentioned. The page was protected for long time, here we want to improve the encyclopedia, so there is no issue of protection for long.  +++$+++ :Thanks Erwat for unprotecting the talk page. I was watching the page and as you unprotect the page, I reoved the tag. I think, there is no harm in doing so. After unprotection I added the page in my watchlist to revert vandalism, so I did not think it was really necessary to discuss with the admin that the user mentioned. The page was protected for long time, here we want to improve the encyclopedia, so there is no issue of protection for long. [[User:Shyam Bihari| <font color="black">'''Shyam'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shyam Bihari|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Shyam Bihari|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 17:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
273120 +++$+++ Shyam Bihari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273118 +++$+++ 273119 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.163296980E09 +++$+++ Ohh, I am really sorry about that Sarah. Sorry for interrupting in your busy life too.  +++$+++ ::Ohh, I am really sorry about that Sarah. Sorry for interrupting in your busy life too. [[User:Shyam Bihari| <font color="black">'''Shyam'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shyam Bihari|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Shyam Bihari|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 18:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
273121 +++$+++ Shyam Bihari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273118 +++$+++ 273120 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.163297640E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah, yup, you are pretty right. This is the busy time for almost every one, even for me. My semester examinations are very near. But I am unable to keep myself away from Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :::Thanks Sarah, yup, you are pretty right. This is the busy time for almost every one, even for me. My semester examinations are very near. But I am unable to keep myself away from Wikipedia. [[User:Shyam Bihari| <font color="black">'''Shyam'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shyam Bihari|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Shyam Bihari|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 18:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
273122 +++$+++ Shyam Bihari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273118 +++$+++ 273121 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.163301240E09 +++$+++ Sarah, same thing would be applied to you, there is no need to apologize to you too:) I do not feel bad whatever happened, so you also should not. I could understand now that the some sockpuppets accounts are troubling you from very long time. Thanks for the wishes.  +++$+++ ::::Sarah, same thing would be applied to you, there is no need to apologize to you too:) I do not feel bad whatever happened, so you also should not. I could understand now that the some sockpuppets accounts are troubling you from very long time. Thanks for the wishes. [[User:Shyam Bihari| <font color="black">'''Shyam'''</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shyam Bihari|<font color="orange">'''T'''</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Shyam Bihari|<font color="red">'''C'''</font>]])</sup> 19:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

585211 +++$+++ NiciVampireHeart +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-19 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.205984220E09 +++$+++ Hay, thanks. I'll do my best with it. ;) \u2665 +++$+++ Hay, thanks. I'll do my best with it. ;) ♥[[User:NiciVampireHeart|<font color="black">'''Nici'''</font>]]♥[[User_talk:NiciVampireHeart|<font color="purple">'''Vampire'''</font>]]♥[[Special:Contributions/NiciVampireHeart|<font color="red">'''Heart'''</font>]]♥ 20:37, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
585212 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585211 +++$+++ 585211 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.205984340E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :)  +++$+++ :You're welcome. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

10976 +++$+++ PM800 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-19 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.290225960E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[French frigate Psych\xe9 (1804)]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|French frigate Psych\xe9 (1804)|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[French frigate Psyché (1804)]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|French frigate Psyché (1804)|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:PM800|PM800]] ([[User talk:PM800|talk]]) 20:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
10977 +++$+++ Yoninah +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10976 +++$+++ 10976 +++$+++ 2010-11-22 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.290483660E09 +++$+++ Please see new suggestion on the DYK talk page. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Please see new suggestion on the DYK talk page. Thanks, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:41, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

535266 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-02 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.157225700E09 +++$+++ I'll add it to the statement of evidence. I think there's more than enough evidence of misconduct to justify Tonycdp being blocked for a substantial period for a range of violations, including POV-pushing, sockpuppeting, disruption and making personal attacks. In the meantime, I suggest that you raise it at the [[Wikipedia:Personal attack intervention noticeboard]] - since I'm involved in the dispute, I can't take action against him myself. --  +++$+++ I'll add it to the statement of evidence. I think there's more than enough evidence of misconduct to justify Tonycdp being blocked for a substantial period for a range of violations, including POV-pushing, sockpuppeting, disruption and making personal attacks. In the meantime, I suggest that you raise it at the [[Wikipedia:Personal attack intervention noticeboard]] - since I'm involved in the dispute, I can't take action against him myself. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] 12:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
535267 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535266 +++$+++ 535266 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.157227080E09 +++$+++ Gracias por el apoyo. No volv\xed hasta que me enter\xe9 de la decisi\xf3n del ArbCom. La mayor\xeda de las p\xe1ginas relacionadas est\xe1n bajo semi-protecci\xf3n permanente por su culpa, por lo menos es mejor que tener que hacer ''revert'' varias veces al d\xeda como antes. A ver si tengo m\xe1s tiempo y me decido de una vez a ayudar en la wiki en espa\xf1ol que ya me vale. Un saludo, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Gracias por el apoyo. No volví hasta que me enteré de la decisión del ArbCom. La mayoría de las páginas relacionadas están bajo semi-protección permanente por su culpa, por lo menos es mejor que tener que hacer ''revert'' varias veces al día como antes. A ver si tengo más tiempo y me decido de una vez a ayudar en la wiki en español que ya me vale. Un saludo, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 12:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

10980 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-27 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.290916020E09 +++$+++ Sorry, AR! I do not understand the question.  The article seems to be easily readable, with no Danish in need of translation. One word - lumber- seems a little too american when timber might be better (first paragraph of Background)  Perhaps I have been too deep into the GRINDER today.  Perhaps you solved your own question before I came to it?  anything specific, please do comeback. +++$+++ Sorry, AR! I do not understand the question.  The article seems to be easily readable, with no Danish in need of translation. One word - lumber- seems a little too american when timber might be better (first paragraph of Background)  Perhaps I have been too deep into the GRINDER today.  Perhaps you solved your own question before I came to it?  anything specific, please do comeback.[[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 19:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
10981 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10980 +++$+++ 10980 +++$+++ 2010-11-28 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.290969480E09 +++$+++ see reply on  +++$+++ :see reply on [[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 10:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

10984 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10984 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-21 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.292956800E09 +++$+++ Acad, on browsing the Wikipedia guidelines on capitalization (on an unrelated subject), I noted under [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#All_caps]] that it says \"Reduce newspaper headlines and '''other titles''' from all caps to \"start case\" \" (my emphasis). I think it's pretty clear that in examples like [[Hired armed brig Ann]], the clasp title should be \"Ann 24 November 1807\", or \"Ann 24 Novr. 1807\" rather than \"ANN 24 NOVR. 1807\".  Any discussion on the subject should probably take place at [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (capital letters)]].   +++$+++ Acad, on browsing the Wikipedia guidelines on capitalization (on an unrelated subject), I noted under [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#All_caps]] that it says "Reduce newspaper headlines and '''other titles''' from all caps to "start case" " (my emphasis). I think it's pretty clear that in examples like [[Hired armed brig Ann]], the clasp title should be "Ann 24 November 1807", or "Ann 24 Novr. 1807" rather than "ANN 24 NOVR. 1807".  Any discussion on the subject should probably take place at [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (capital letters)]].  [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 10:40, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
10985 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10984 +++$+++ 10984 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.292962800E09 +++$+++ Shem, I have put in an inquiry on the page you suggested. However, when something is in quotes, such as \"Hired Armed Defence Ship\", and you start changing caps, why not change spelling as well? Or for that matter, why don't we '''modernize''' other direct quotes, such as changing \"GUADALOUPE\" to \"Guadeloupe\" or \"PICKLE 3 JANY. 1807\" to \"Pickle 3 January 1807\". Once you start changing direct quotes what meaning does quoting have? The point of quoting is to convey the feeling of the original as best as possible. Regards,  +++$+++ :Shem, I have put in an inquiry on the page you suggested. However, when something is in quotes, such as "Hired Armed Defence Ship", and you start changing caps, why not change spelling as well? Or for that matter, why don't we '''modernize''' other direct quotes, such as changing "GUADALOUPE" to "Guadeloupe" or "PICKLE 3 JANY. 1807" to "Pickle 3 January 1807". Once you start changing direct quotes what meaning does quoting have? The point of quoting is to convey the feeling of the original as best as possible. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 12:20, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
10986 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10984 +++$+++ 10985 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.292977800E09 +++$+++ The spelling issue is a bit of a [[straw man]]; I'm not saying change the spelling, just follow the guidelines and place the words in the appropriate case.  Anyway, these are not quotations, but names of medal clasps, which are always in title case in WP, except where ''you'' make them caps.  See [[Military General Service Medal]] for a good example.  +++$+++ ::The spelling issue is a bit of a [[straw man]]; I'm not saying change the spelling, just follow the guidelines and place the words in the appropriate case.  Anyway, these are not quotations, but names of medal clasps, which are always in title case in WP, except where ''you'' make them caps.  See [[Military General Service Medal]] for a good example. [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 16:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

482428 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-27 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.174985640E09 +++$+++ Here's one who has continued to \"sodomize\" pages despite being warned. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Cakemix07470]  +++$+++ Here's one who has continued to "sodomize" pages despite being warned. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cakemix07470] [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 01:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
482429 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482428 +++$+++ 482428 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.174985760E09 +++$+++ Kicked that one's butt.  ;)  \u2014 +++$+++ :Kicked that one's butt.  ;)  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 01:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
482430 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482428 +++$+++ 482429 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.174986060E09 +++$+++ Kudos. As James Bond (Timothy Dalton) said, \"He got the boot.\" (You had to be there).  +++$+++ ::Kudos. As James Bond (Timothy Dalton) said, "He got the boot." (You had to be there). [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 02:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

273130 +++$+++ Walton monarchist89 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163390760E09 +++$+++ Thank you '''so''' much (sarcasm) for your deeply unpleasant comments on my RfA. After months of working hard, following WP:NPOV to the letter, improving various articles and winning the respect of admins, not to mention working with the AMA, I feel that all my hard work has been thrown back in my face. I think it is now likely that I will stop editing Wikipedia altogether - the whole site is clearly run by a little clique of admins who attach more importance to edit counts than personality. I really don't care if you block me, call this a personal attack, or anything else - I think I've had enough of following the rules. Once again, thank you so much for destroying my confidence, ruining the one real diversion that existed in my life, and generally making me feel bad.  +++$+++ Thank you '''so''' much (sarcasm) for your deeply unpleasant comments on my RfA. After months of working hard, following WP:NPOV to the letter, improving various articles and winning the respect of admins, not to mention working with the AMA, I feel that all my hard work has been thrown back in my face. I think it is now likely that I will stop editing Wikipedia altogether - the whole site is clearly run by a little clique of admins who attach more importance to edit counts than personality. I really don't care if you block me, call this a personal attack, or anything else - I think I've had enough of following the rules. Once again, thank you so much for destroying my confidence, ruining the one real diversion that existed in my life, and generally making me feel bad. [[User:Walton monarchist89|Walton monarchist89]] 20:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
273131 +++$+++ KazakhPol +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273130 +++$+++ 273130 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.163391540E09 +++$+++ Please note that Walton monarchist89 posted this message on the talkpage of every user who opposed his nomination for adminship.  +++$+++ :Please note that Walton monarchist89 posted this message on the talkpage of every user who opposed his nomination for adminship. [[User:KazakhPol|KazakhPol]] 20:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
273132 +++$+++ Walton monarchist89 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273130 +++$+++ 273131 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.163391600E09 +++$+++ I apologise for the above comment. I was in a bad mood at the time. In reality, I do understand why you voted against my RfA. It's true that I don't have a huge amount of experience and I may decide to reapply in the future. Please accept my apology.  +++$+++ ::I apologise for the above comment. I was in a bad mood at the time. In reality, I do understand why you voted against my RfA. It's true that I don't have a huge amount of experience and I may decide to reapply in the future. Please accept my apology. [[User:Walton monarchist89|Walton monarchist89]] 20:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

10987 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-21 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.292985300E09 +++$+++ Acad, at [[HMS_Boadicea_(1797)#Post_war]] the article suddenly starts talking about ''Pomone'' without any context - is this a typo?  You're a major contributor - can you clarify?  +++$+++ Acad, at [[HMS_Boadicea_(1797)#Post_war]] the article suddenly starts talking about ''Pomone'' without any context - is this a typo?  You're a major contributor - can you clarify? [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 18:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
10988 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10987 +++$+++ 10987 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.292985900E09 +++$+++ Definitely a typo. I have tidied up a bit as well. This section needs more work\/expansion, but it will have to wait. +++$+++ :Definitely a typo. I have tidied up a bit as well. This section needs more work/expansion, but it will have to wait.[[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 18:45, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

45522 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45522 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-26 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.264543620E09 +++$+++ You're doing a great job with pruning this article. I'm beginning to become just a little bit optimistic that we might be able to make something decent out of it yet. An awful lot of work ahead yet though. -- +++$+++ You're doing a great job with pruning this article. I'm beginning to become just a little bit optimistic that we might be able to make something decent out of it yet. An awful lot of work ahead yet though. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 14:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45523 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45522 +++$+++ 45522 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.264543800E09 +++$+++ Courage mon brave! I think I've taken out most of the crap and even kept with the American spelling (behavior for God's sake!). It needs to be less US-centric now. As you say - a long way to go +++$+++ :Courage mon brave! I think I've taken out most of the crap and even kept with the American spelling (behavior for God's sake!). It needs to be less US-centric now. As you say - a long way to go[[User:Richerman|Richerman]] ([[User talk:Richerman#top|talk]]) 14:10, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45524 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45522 +++$+++ 45523 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.264545000E09 +++$+++ I'm considering dumping that American Ferret Association colo'''u'''r classification, as it's very specific to the States, not used anywhere else. I'm not happy about that import regulations stuff either. What do you think? -- +++$+++ ::I'm considering dumping that American Ferret Association colo'''u'''r classification, as it's very specific to the States, not used anywhere else. I'm not happy about that import regulations stuff either. What do you think? --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 14:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45525 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45522 +++$+++ 45524 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.264545600E09 +++$+++ I hadn't realised it was US specific but, if so, that sounds like a good idea. The import regulation stuff could certainly be shortened to a couple of sentences too. I was an animal technician for most of my working life (shock horror!) but I don't have the reference books any more. I'll have to see if I can get hold of some of them such as ''The UFAW handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals'' They used to have a copy in the library here at Salford many years ago. One of the reasons they were used for research was that they are an easy to keep carnivore, although I don't think they're used much any more - at least not in the UK.  +++$+++ :::I hadn't realised it was US specific but, if so, that sounds like a good idea. The import regulation stuff could certainly be shortened to a couple of sentences too. I was an animal technician for most of my working life (shock horror!) but I don't have the reference books any more. I'll have to see if I can get hold of some of them such as ''The UFAW handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals'' They used to have a copy in the library here at Salford many years ago. One of the reasons they were used for research was that they are an easy to keep carnivore, although I don't think they're used much any more - at least not in the UK. [[User:Richerman|Richerman]] ([[User talk:Richerman#top|talk]]) 14:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45526 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45522 +++$+++ 45525 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.264546080E09 +++$+++ Perhaps surprisingly they're not uncommonly used here in the UK as lab animals, because in many ways their biology is like ours. They catch our human flu, for instance, so they're great subjects for flu research. I was just reading a ''New Scientist'' article on sound location, in which ferrets were used because they hear just like we do. -- +++$+++ ::::Perhaps surprisingly they're not uncommonly used here in the UK as lab animals, because in many ways their biology is like ours. They catch our human flu, for instance, so they're great subjects for flu research. I was just reading a ''New Scientist'' article on sound location, in which ferrets were used because they hear just like we do. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 14:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45527 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45522 +++$+++ 45526 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.264547700E09 +++$+++ Ah, New Scientist - I try to get a copy every week if I can - and they have a good online search facility. I keep flirting with the idea of paying for a subscription so I can have access to the full online articles. As for the ferrets hearing like use - I hope they hear better than I do these days :)  +++$+++ :::::Ah, New Scientist - I try to get a copy every week if I can - and they have a good online search facility. I keep flirting with the idea of paying for a subscription so I can have access to the full online articles. As for the ferrets hearing like use - I hope they hear better than I do these days :) [[User:Richerman|Richerman]] ([[User talk:Richerman#top|talk]]) 15:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45528 +++$+++ Peter cohen +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45522 +++$+++ 45525 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.264569180E09 +++$+++ When I was googling somepoint late last year, I came across a NZ site which referred to three basic colours (presumably polecat, white and sandy). The USAian list is definitely far too complex for an international article and if we include one categorisation, we would have to mention others. On vision, Another NZ  site indicated that some ferrets see into the IR spectrum which. I think it was scientific research funding by their pest control people as they were wondering why their observations with IR cameras weren't that succesful.-- +++$+++ ::::When I was googling somepoint late last year, I came across a NZ site which referred to three basic colours (presumably polecat, white and sandy). The USAian list is definitely far too complex for an international article and if we include one categorisation, we would have to mention others. On vision, Another NZ  site indicated that some ferrets see into the IR spectrum which. I think it was scientific research funding by their pest control people as they were wondering why their observations with IR cameras weren't that succesful.--[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 21:13, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
45529 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45522 +++$+++ 45528 +++$+++ 2010-01-27 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.264615800E09 +++$+++ Ha, I'll bet that confused them a bit. You think you're sneaking up on them in the dark and you're really shining a searchlight! If you can find it again it would make an interesting addition  +++$+++ :::::Ha, I'll bet that confused them a bit. You think you're sneaking up on them in the dark and you're really shining a searchlight! If you can find it again it would make an interesting addition [[User:Richerman|Richerman]] ([[User talk:Richerman#top|talk]]) 10:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
45530 +++$+++ Peter cohen +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45522 +++$+++ 45529 +++$+++ 2010-01-29 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.264805940E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/adt.waikato.ac.nz\/uploads\/approved\/adt-uow20070126.121529\/public\/01front.pdf This] must have been what I saw. So it was only a small study at master's level but the results were published [http:\/\/www.publish.csiro.au\/paper\/WR08083.htm|here] in a peer-reviewed journal.-- +++$+++ ::::::[http://adt.waikato.ac.nz/uploads/approved/adt-uow20070126.121529/public/01front.pdf This] must have been what I saw. So it was only a small study at master's level but the results were published [http://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/WR08083.htm|here] in a peer-reviewed journal.--[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 14:59, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
45531 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45522 +++$+++ 45530 +++$+++ 2010-01-29 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.264806840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that. I've found some more bits about their vision so I'll add something in.  +++$+++ :::::::Thanks for that. I've found some more bits about their vision so I'll add something in. [[User:Richerman|Richerman]] ([[User talk:Richerman#top|talk]]) 15:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

273134 +++$+++ Ralbot +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-14 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.163510640E09 +++$+++ <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost\/Tools\/Spamlist|''Signpost'' spamlist]].  If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.   +++$+++ <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist|''Signpost'' spamlist]].  If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.  [[User:Ralbot|Ralbot]] 05:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
273135 +++$+++ Trialsanderrors +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273134 +++$+++ 273134 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 06:17:00 +++$+++ 1.163513820E09 +++$+++ ~  +++$+++ :~ [[User:Trialsanderrors|trialsanderrors]] 06:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

10991 +++$+++ Keith H99 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-04 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.294129320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Keith H99|Keith H99]] ([[User talk:Keith H99|talk]]) 00:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
10992 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10991 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.294216140E09 +++$+++ Hi Keith, I cannot disagree more with your arguments. I am engaged in a project of replacing unsourced or even sourced to Phillips\/Pbenyon or James items with citations to the ''London Gazette'' or the ''Naval Chronicle'', including adding info that Phillips or Benyon have dropped. In the course of that work, I find many instances of other vessels sharing in the event, the prize money, etc. I include the vessels' names and look up the launch dates so that I can refer properly to the vessel, rather than cursorily. I often find that the vessel is already in WIkipedia, and sometimes I can copy over the info when it is missing. In many, perhaps more cases, I find that the vessel does not yet have an article. Sometimes, I see that I can quickly create an article, typically in cases where the vessel had a short life, and I do. In other cases a red link remains. That is a feature, not a bug. Having looked up the launch date, it seems stupid to throw it away, forcing someone later to rediscover and add the date. To object to red links is to throw away information and to privilege form over content. THat seems contrary to the spirit of an encyclopedia. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Hi Keith, I cannot disagree more with your arguments. I am engaged in a project of replacing unsourced or even sourced to Phillips/Pbenyon or James items with citations to the ''London Gazette'' or the ''Naval Chronicle'', including adding info that Phillips or Benyon have dropped. In the course of that work, I find many instances of other vessels sharing in the event, the prize money, etc. I include the vessels' names and look up the launch dates so that I can refer properly to the vessel, rather than cursorily. I often find that the vessel is already in WIkipedia, and sometimes I can copy over the info when it is missing. In many, perhaps more cases, I find that the vessel does not yet have an article. Sometimes, I see that I can quickly create an article, typically in cases where the vessel had a short life, and I do. In other cases a red link remains. That is a feature, not a bug. Having looked up the launch date, it seems stupid to throw it away, forcing someone later to rediscover and add the date. To object to red links is to throw away information and to privilege form over content. THat seems contrary to the spirit of an encyclopedia. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 00:29, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
10993 +++$+++ Keith H99 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10991 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.294467000E09 +++$+++ On a different subject, I found your quotations from the London Gazette, with regard to prize money from the Chesapeake campaign, to be very interesting. Regards  +++$+++ :::On a different subject, I found your quotations from the London Gazette, with regard to prize money from the Chesapeake campaign, to be very interesting. Regards [[User:Keith H99|Keith H99]] ([[User talk:Keith H99|talk]]) 22:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
10994 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 10991 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-08 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.294534740E09 +++$+++ The policy is laid down at [[Wikipedia:Red link]], and I have to say that Acad has a point - over the years I have consistently seen the red links he creates turned into articles (often, but not always by Acad himself).  It is a slow process, I grant you.  The heart of the guidance seems to be \"Sometimes it is useful in editing article text to create a red link to indicate that a page will be created soon or that an article should be created for the topic because it would be notable and verifiable.\" If you accept that the ships for which red links are created are potentially notable and verifiable, then the creation of those red links is right and proper.   +++$+++ ::::The policy is laid down at [[Wikipedia:Red link]], and I have to say that Acad has a point - over the years I have consistently seen the red links he creates turned into articles (often, but not always by Acad himself).  It is a slow process, I grant you.  The heart of the guidance seems to be "Sometimes it is useful in editing article text to create a red link to indicate that a page will be created soon or that an article should be created for the topic because it would be notable and verifiable." If you accept that the ships for which red links are created are potentially notable and verifiable, then the creation of those red links is right and proper.  [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 16:59, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

535282 +++$+++ JPD +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535282 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-04 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.157408700E09 +++$+++ Hi Asterion. I have answered your question at [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/JPD]] - I'd definitely appreciate being able to do moves when I come across them, and so will be glad to help out with backlogs.  +++$+++ Hi Asterion. I have answered your question at [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/JPD]] - I'd definitely appreciate being able to do moves when I come across them, and so will be glad to help out with backlogs. [[User:JPD|JPD]] ([[User talk:JPD|talk]]) 15:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
535283 +++$+++ JPD +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535282 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.157499060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your support - the RfA finished at 94\/1\/0. I hope I will live up to the confidence you have shown in me.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your support - the RfA finished at 94/1/0. I hope I will live up to the confidence you have shown in me. [[User:JPD|JPD]] ([[User talk:JPD|talk]]) 16:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

535284 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535284 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-04 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.157413560E09 +++$+++ On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, -- +++$+++ On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 16:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
535285 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535284 +++$+++ 535284 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.157413680E09 +++$+++ Thanks, we are working on this. I shall keep you informed. Regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Thanks, we are working on this. I shall keep you informed. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 16:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
535286 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535284 +++$+++ 535284 +++$+++ 2006-09-07 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.157613060E09 +++$+++ I've just added the joint statement of evidence to [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Kosovo\/Evidence]]. --  +++$+++ :I've just added the joint statement of evidence to [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo/Evidence]]. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] 00:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

273143 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273143 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.163883300E09 +++$+++ Sarah, given your comment on Gn's page, it would not be out of order for you to leave your mark  +++$+++ Sarah, given your comment on Gn's page, it would not be out of order for you to leave your mark [[User:Hesperian/Sandbox|here]] if you wish to. Regards. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 12:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
273144 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273143 +++$+++ 273143 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.163885700E09 +++$+++ Good grief.  I just scanned that and was a bit surprised - my first reaction was to ignore, but at what cost?  Perhaps Hesp. may like to refactor most or all the co-nominations as \"early supports\" or something like that (I'm sure he'll pick this thread up).  I suggest you add your <s>2c<\/s> well-considered opinions (if you wish) to and let H. work it out along those lines. &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ :Good grief.  I just scanned that and was a bit surprised - my first reaction was to ignore, but at what cost?  Perhaps Hesp. may like to refactor most or all the co-nominations as "early supports" or something like that (I'm sure he'll pick this thread up).  I suggest you add your <s>2c</s> well-considered opinions (if you wish) to and let H. work it out along those lines. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 13:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
273145 +++$+++ Gnangarra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273143 +++$+++ 273144 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.163888700E09 +++$+++ Since Hesp. ''will notice'' this even after reading and considering that thread, I'd prefer to let the co nominations stand as they are, Sarah your welcome to add to the list if you so desire. Personally if editors chose to oppose my nomination because of that whats really lost I'll be doing what I'm doing now I think though instead of waiting for [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Banksia_integrifolia]] to be completed, it should be started now. The reason is I dont want any of my RfA to reflected negatively against yourselves, neither I do want to be accused of compaigning for support.  +++$+++ ::Since Hesp. ''will notice'' this even after reading and considering that thread, I'd prefer to let the co nominations stand as they are, Sarah your welcome to add to the list if you so desire. Personally if editors chose to oppose my nomination because of that whats really lost I'll be doing what I'm doing now I think though instead of waiting for [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Banksia_integrifolia]] to be completed, it should be started now. The reason is I dont want any of my RfA to reflected negatively against yourselves, neither I do want to be accused of compaigning for support. [[User:Gnangarra|Gnangarra]] 14:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

11001 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-23 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.295831580E09 +++$+++ Hi Acad  As you suggested, I have been drafting something on the [[User:Viking1808\/HDMS Lougen (1805)|Lougen]].  The story seems rather thin to me, but perhaps you (or others) know a good bit more.  How the ship finished up at the Scheldt I do not know, and it seems a long life before it was finally shipwrecked off Bremerhafen.  Notes on the other two ships of the same name will probably best be moved before anything goes \"live\" .  Can you have a look see? (I am still learning, but at least can find the Infobox now!)  +++$+++ Hi Acad  As you suggested, I have been drafting something on the [[User:Viking1808/HDMS Lougen (1805)|Lougen]].  The story seems rather thin to me, but perhaps you (or others) know a good bit more.  How the ship finished up at the Scheldt I do not know, and it seems a long life before it was finally shipwrecked off Bremerhafen.  Notes on the other two ships of the same name will probably best be moved before anything goes "live" .  Can you have a look see? (I am still learning, but at least can find the Infobox now!) [[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 17:13, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
11002 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11001 +++$+++ 11001 +++$+++ 2011-01-23 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.295838480E09 +++$+++ Hi Viking1808, I have fiddled with the ''Lougen'' article. More will follow. As you may have noticed, I have moved the info on the ''Lougen''s to a disambig page, [[HDMS Lougen]]. Could you please check that page and add info on the fates of ''Lougen'' (1791) and (1941). Also, links to the naval museum's record cards would be good. I never did find the infobox template. I just cut-and-pasted from existing articles and changed the info. :-) Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Viking1808, I have fiddled with the ''Lougen'' article. More will follow. As you may have noticed, I have moved the info on the ''Lougen''s to a disambig page, [[HDMS Lougen]]. Could you please check that page and add info on the fates of ''Lougen'' (1791) and (1941). Also, links to the naval museum's record cards would be good. I never did find the infobox template. I just cut-and-pasted from existing articles and changed the info. :-) Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 19:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
11003 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11001 +++$+++ 11002 +++$+++ 2011-01-23 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.295846880E09 +++$+++ Potted histories are now in place.  If a larger page is called for, for Lougen (1791), we should note that the captain in 1801 when she was so successful in the Danish West Indies was Carl Wilhelm Jessen, later of the [[Battle of Zealand Point]].  Perhaps to get away from \"the cult of the ship\" (which seems to me to be a peculiarly British emphasis) there may be space for an expanded section in [[Scuttling]] for the Danish 1943 actions. Only since Christmas have I come across this bit of history in a new book of \"Danish Naval Heroes\" (in Danish). All a long way from 1808!! +++$+++ :: Potted histories are now in place.  If a larger page is called for, for Lougen (1791), we should note that the captain in 1801 when she was so successful in the Danish West Indies was Carl Wilhelm Jessen, later of the [[Battle of Zealand Point]].  Perhaps to get away from "the cult of the ship" (which seems to me to be a peculiarly British emphasis) there may be space for an expanded section in [[Scuttling]] for the Danish 1943 actions. Only since Christmas have I come across this bit of history in a new book of "Danish Naval Heroes" (in Danish). All a long way from 1808!![[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 21:28, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
11004 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11001 +++$+++ 11003 +++$+++ 2011-01-23 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.295848020E09 +++$+++ Hi Viking1808, I saw the potted histories in [[HDMS Lougen]]. Thanks. When we (you? :-) ) get the {{HDMS Lougen (1791)|''Lougen'']] article we can move some of that into it. I have no problem with event-centered articles. I personally prefer to prepare ship-centered ones as I have, or have access to, useful reference books. I think the two approaches are useful complements - if I may use jargon - they represent diachronic and synchronic approaches. The neat thing about Wikipedia is that one can link to other stories, and one can hope that someone accessing one article will surf to other articles. As for drifting away from 1808, I find that happens all the time. An article will incorporate several red links, and that will lead me to try to turn the link blue, which will lead me further afield. For instance, the article on [[HSwMS Ulla Fersen (1789)]] developed that way. In time, I will probably get to doing an article on {{HMS|Childers|1778|2}}. Regards,  +++$+++ :::Hi Viking1808, I saw the potted histories in [[HDMS Lougen]]. Thanks. When we (you? :-) ) get the {{HDMS Lougen (1791)|''Lougen'']] article we can move some of that into it. I have no problem with event-centered articles. I personally prefer to prepare ship-centered ones as I have, or have access to, useful reference books. I think the two approaches are useful complements - if I may use jargon - they represent diachronic and synchronic approaches. The neat thing about Wikipedia is that one can link to other stories, and one can hope that someone accessing one article will surf to other articles. As for drifting away from 1808, I find that happens all the time. An article will incorporate several red links, and that will lead me to try to turn the link blue, which will lead me further afield. For instance, the article on [[HSwMS Ulla Fersen (1789)]] developed that way. In time, I will probably get to doing an article on {{HMS|Childers|1778|2}}. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 21:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

273146 +++$+++ Cyberjunkie +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.163891220E09 +++$+++ Wow. I'm rather surprised that people feel so strongly about it. The arguments put against co-noms don't seem particularly strong; in fact, it's largely people stating that they find it personally irritating, without proving why it's necessarily a Bad Thing. For the record, I don't mind if I'm removed as a co-nom \u2013 my endorsement stands no matter where it's placed ;).-- +++$+++ Wow. I'm rather surprised that people feel so strongly about it. The arguments put against co-noms don't seem particularly strong; in fact, it's largely people stating that they find it personally irritating, without proving why it's necessarily a Bad Thing. For the record, I don't mind if I'm removed as a co-nom – my endorsement stands no matter where it's placed ;).--[[User:Cyberjunkie|cj]] | [[User talk:Cyberjunkie|talk]] 15:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
273147 +++$+++ Gnangarra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273146 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.163892480E09 +++$+++ I notice your comment about 2c, thought I'd point that since 2c are no longer in circulation they have increased significantly in value.  +++$+++ ::I notice your comment about 2c, thought I'd point that since 2c are no longer in circulation they have increased significantly in value. [[User:Gnangarra|Gnangarra]] 15:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
273148 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273146 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.163893500E09 +++$+++ We haven't seen it yet - it may be only worth 2c.  (no pressure!) &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ :::We haven't seen it yet - it may be only worth 2c.  (no pressure!) &mdash;&nbsp;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 15:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

482431 +++$+++ HIZKIAH +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-24 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.169688000E09 +++$+++ another vandal {{vandal|216.83.96.18}} --<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\">HIZKIAH<\/font> <small>( +++$+++ another vandal {{vandal|216.83.96.18}} --<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">HIZKIAH</font> <small>([[User:HIZKIAH|User]]&nbsp;&#149;&nbsp;[[User_talk:HIZKIAH|Talk]])</small> 17:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
482432 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482431 +++$+++ 482431 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.169690520E09 +++$+++ I'll field throwaway accounts personally (like above) but IPs should go to [[WP:AIV]].  They're more of a judgement call.  Thanks.  \u2014 +++$+++ :I'll field throwaway accounts personally (like above) but IPs should go to [[WP:AIV]].  They're more of a judgement call.  Thanks.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 18:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

535293 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-14 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.158294000E09 +++$+++ Could you please take a look at [[Pagania]], [[Zachlumia]], [[Travunia]] and [[Doclea]] and the corresponding histories? Then take a look at [[User_talk:Afrika paprika]] and his contributions. Then comment, please. -- +++$+++ Could you please take a look at [[Pagania]], [[Zachlumia]], [[Travunia]] and [[Doclea]] and the corresponding histories? Then take a look at [[User_talk:Afrika paprika]] and his contributions. Then comment, please. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 21:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
535294 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535293 +++$+++ 535293 +++$+++ 2006-09-15 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.158368100E09 +++$+++ Thanks - however, I wasn't trying to reorder the articles - they practicly didn't exist before me. How've you been, by the way? -- +++$+++ :Thanks - however, I wasn't trying to reorder the articles - they practicly didn't exist before me. How've you been, by the way? --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 17:55, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

535296 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535296 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-15 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.158367860E09 +++$+++ For the arbitration committee. -- +++$+++ For the arbitration committee. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 17:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
535297 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535296 +++$+++ 535296 +++$+++ 2006-09-15 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.158372420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for this. I hope the injuction will help to calm down things. If possible, can you mention it on the Administrator Noticeboard, so someone can keep a close eye?-- +++$+++ :Thanks for this. I hope the injuction will help to calm down things. If possible, can you mention it on the Administrator Noticeboard, so someone can keep a close eye?--[[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''talk'''</font>]]</small></sup> 19:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

11010 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11010 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-17 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.298007960E09 +++$+++ With editing help from the three of you (You, Shem and Corneredmouse) I think the page on the [[User:Viking1808\/HDMS Lougen (1791)|first Lougen]] is ready for launch.  Any comment? +++$+++ With editing help from the three of you (You, Shem and Corneredmouse) I think the page on the [[User:Viking1808/HDMS Lougen (1791)|first Lougen]] is ready for launch.  Any comment?[[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 21:46, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
11011 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11010 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.298029140E09 +++$+++ Hi Viking1808, I have done some light editing on ''Lougen'' and much more extensive editing on Jessen. For some languages there is a template to indicate translation from another Wikipedia, but I don't know the format, or even if one exists for Danish, so I did the next best thing. In the text on the Jessen article I used question marks (???) to designate places where I think there is a need for disambiguation. In particular, the article should name the relevant King of Denmark, and link to him. Hope this helps. The ''Lougen'' article is ready to go. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Hi Viking1808, I have done some light editing on ''Lougen'' and much more extensive editing on Jessen. For some languages there is a template to indicate translation from another Wikipedia, but I don't know the format, or even if one exists for Danish, so I did the next best thing. In the text on the Jessen article I used question marks (???) to designate places where I think there is a need for disambiguation. In particular, the article should name the relevant King of Denmark, and link to him. Hope this helps. The ''Lougen'' article is ready to go. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 03:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

526123 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526123 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-30 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.154294280E09 +++$+++ Could you someone in your project give this a final copyedit? The FAR is almost over and it's at that point where they want a final copyedit but I'm not a mind reader and I've been heavily involved in saving it. A third party would see things I wouldn't. I asked Kirill too. Thanks.  +++$+++ Could you someone in your project give this a final copyedit? The FAR is almost over and it's at that point where they want a final copyedit but I'm not a mind reader and I've been heavily involved in saving it. A third party would see things I wouldn't. I asked Kirill too. Thanks. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 14:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
526124 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526123 +++$+++ 526123 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.154380680E09 +++$+++ MOH survived FAR, it's closed! Yippee!  +++$+++ :MOH survived FAR, it's closed! Yippee! [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 14:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
526125 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526123 +++$+++ 526124 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.154411220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the barnstar, it's much appreciated and I'm glad you appreciate the efforts.  It's my first award outside of Scouting articles. I'm glad our projects work well together.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the barnstar, it's much appreciated and I'm glad you appreciate the efforts.  It's my first award outside of Scouting articles. I'm glad our projects work well together. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 22:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

11012 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11012 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-18 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.298055960E09 +++$+++ Your edits and help are always appreciated! Thank you! I have taken [[HDMS Lougen (1791)]] public, and will continue to polish Jessen (and the question marks) for a while yet.  +++$+++ Your edits and help are always appreciated! Thank you! I have taken [[HDMS Lougen (1791)]] public, and will continue to polish Jessen (and the question marks) for a while yet. [[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 11:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
11013 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11012 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.298073180E09 +++$+++ Hi Viking1808, You might look at [[Battle of Silda]]. There there is a mention of the capture of \"Gunboat No. 5\". Could this be our ''Grinder''? Also, after \"Jessen\", you might consider doing an article on HDMS ''Holstein'', which became HMS ''Nassau''. If you do the Danish part, I would add in the British history from 1801 on. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Hi Viking1808, You might look at [[Battle of Silda]]. There there is a mention of the capture of "Gunboat No. 5". Could this be our ''Grinder''? Also, after "Jessen", you might consider doing an article on HDMS ''Holstein'', which became HMS ''Nassau''. If you do the Danish part, I would add in the British history from 1801 on. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 15:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
11014 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11012 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.298086320E09 +++$+++ Grinder (Prise Nr 5) was not burned but recaptured (generobert) 5-7-1811, whereas Silda was the year earlier. Also, from the little we have gleaned, she should have been operating off northern Jutland, not north of Bergen. So, '''''sadly''''', this is not our Grinder.  Concerning other ships, I will see if there is anything on Nassau\/Holsteen in Danish once, as you say, Jessen is out of the way. +++$+++ ::: Grinder (Prise Nr 5) was not burned but recaptured (generobert) 5-7-1811, whereas Silda was the year earlier. Also, from the little we have gleaned, she should have been operating off northern Jutland, not north of Bergen. So, '''''sadly''''', this is not our Grinder.  Concerning other ships, I will see if there is anything on Nassau/Holsteen in Danish once, as you say, Jessen is out of the way.[[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 19:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
11015 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11012 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.298086680E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that's what I had in the back of my mind. Clearly, there are too few ''Grinder''s in the records and too many No. 5s. Regards,  +++$+++ :::Yeah, that's what I had in the back of my mind. Clearly, there are too few ''Grinder''s in the records and too many No. 5s. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 19:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

11016 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-21 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.298338860E09 +++$+++ I think my next task will be to prepare an article on [[HMS Grinder|Grinder]] with all that we have, then simply keep it tucked away for when (not if) the British fog clears  +++$+++ I think my next task will be to prepare an article on [[HMS Grinder|Grinder]] with all that we have, then simply keep it tucked away for when (not if) the British fog clears [[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 17:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
11017 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11016 +++$+++ 11016 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.298419080E09 +++$+++ Hi Viking1808, Thanks for the work on ''Holsteen''. As you can see, I have built out the article. I still have a little more to add but it is already in pretty good shape. Good luck with ''Grinder''. I am not holding my breath waiting for the fog to lift. The more I work on these articles, the more I realize that when things happened far from London they did not necessarily get into Admiralty records. I recently discovered that the British took into service the five American gunboats that they captured at the [[Battle of Lake Borgne]]. This did not get into Admiralty records, so Winfield doesn't have them. ''Grinder'' may be something similar. I suspect that she was a Danish gunboat captured in Danish waters or the Baltic and never notified to London. The biggest mystery is not that though, it is who the heck was Lieutenant Esther?  Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Viking1808, Thanks for the work on ''Holsteen''. As you can see, I have built out the article. I still have a little more to add but it is already in pretty good shape. Good luck with ''Grinder''. I am not holding my breath waiting for the fog to lift. The more I work on these articles, the more I realize that when things happened far from London they did not necessarily get into Admiralty records. I recently discovered that the British took into service the five American gunboats that they captured at the [[Battle of Lake Borgne]]. This did not get into Admiralty records, so Winfield doesn't have them. ''Grinder'' may be something similar. I suspect that she was a Danish gunboat captured in Danish waters or the Baltic and never notified to London. The biggest mystery is not that though, it is who the heck was Lieutenant Esther?  Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 15:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

273161 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.163842620E09 +++$+++ Its not YOUR version, but you're replacing a version with SUSPISION of copywrite infringment with a version that has EVIDENCE of it. Now if we have to choose between a version that is obviously plagerised and a version that you might think is posibly plagerised because you think the user it too stupid to write it themself, which one would you pick? My version stays until you can verify it is plagerism. However, in the mean time i will work on it to make it less bias. I feel that is fair. [[Kiran90]] 01:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ Its not YOUR version, but you're replacing a version with SUSPISION of copywrite infringment with a version that has EVIDENCE of it. Now if we have to choose between a version that is obviously plagerised and a version that you might think is posibly plagerised because you think the user it too stupid to write it themself, which one would you pick? My version stays until you can verify it is plagerism. However, in the mean time i will work on it to make it less bias. I feel that is fair. [[Kiran90]] 01:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
273162 +++$+++ BenAveling +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273161 +++$+++ 273161 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.163843340E09 +++$+++ Try {{tl|Cv-unsure}}.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Try {{tl|Cv-unsure}}.  Regards, [[User talk:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 01:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

11018 +++$+++ Roscelese +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-22 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.298381700E09 +++$+++ Hey, I saw your article on the ''Mosambique'' in the Good New Article search results and looked at your other contributions, and I see that you do a lot on naval history. Would you be interested in helping me to expand [[Action of December 1669]]?  +++$+++ Hey, I saw your article on the ''Mosambique'' in the Good New Article search results and looked at your other contributions, and I see that you do a lot on naval history. Would you be interested in helping me to expand [[Action of December 1669]]? [[User:Roscelese|Roscelese]] ([[User talk:Roscelese|talk]] &sdot; [[Special:Contributions/Roscelese|contribs]]) 05:35, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
11019 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11018 +++$+++ 11018 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.298419200E09 +++$+++ Hi Roscalese, Thanks for the invite, but I am going to have to decline. I have more than enough to do with the vessels of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, and there, at least, I have some reference books and am starting to know my way around the sources. Best of luck, Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Roscalese, Thanks for the invite, but I am going to have to decline. I have more than enough to do with the vessels of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, and there, at least, I have some reference books and am starting to know my way around the sources. Best of luck, Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 16:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
11020 +++$+++ Roscelese +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11018 +++$+++ 11019 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.298439060E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, good luck.  +++$+++ ::Fair enough, good luck. [[User:Roscelese|Roscelese]] ([[User talk:Roscelese|talk]] &sdot; [[Special:Contributions/Roscelese|contribs]]) 21:31, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

11021 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-28 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.298958960E09 +++$+++ Acad, you know from the discussion at [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#All_Caps_when_quoting_an_inscription]] that all caps for medal inscriptions is wrong (for example, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=HMS_Amelia_(1796)&curid=15335236&diff=416445464&oldid=416438899 here]).  Please stop doing it.  Thanks.   +++$+++ Acad, you know from the discussion at [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#All_Caps_when_quoting_an_inscription]] that all caps for medal inscriptions is wrong (for example, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Amelia_(1796)&curid=15335236&diff=416445464&oldid=416438899 here]).  Please stop doing it.  Thanks.  [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 21:56, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
11022 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11021 +++$+++ 11021 +++$+++ 2011-03-01 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.299034260E09 +++$+++ Hi Shem, 1) Thanks for the clean ups. 2) I cut and paste the medal inscriptions from a website that reproduces them as they were. I don't bother recasting them to conform to Wiki rules because, as you know, I don't like the rules. (I admit I am being passive-aggressive in my opposition.) I figure that someone, generally you, will eventually make the changes, which I do not oppose. In the meantime, I am spending my time trying to provide in-line citations to proper sources. (Phillips is not a proper source because he did not give his sources. My experience is that he used primarily the ''Naval Chronicle'', Marshall, and James, and I link, where I can find his source, to them, or even better, to the ''London Gazette'', when I can determine that that is the source that those sources used.) Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Shem, 1) Thanks for the clean ups. 2) I cut and paste the medal inscriptions from a website that reproduces them as they were. I don't bother recasting them to conform to Wiki rules because, as you know, I don't like the rules. (I admit I am being passive-aggressive in my opposition.) I figure that someone, generally you, will eventually make the changes, which I do not oppose. In the meantime, I am spending my time trying to provide in-line citations to proper sources. (Phillips is not a proper source because he did not give his sources. My experience is that he used primarily the ''Naval Chronicle'', Marshall, and James, and I link, where I can find his source, to them, or even better, to the ''London Gazette'', when I can determine that that is the source that those sources used.) Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 18:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
11023 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11021 +++$+++ 11022 +++$+++ 2011-03-06 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.299466500E09 +++$+++ I understand you; you're saying that you're deliberately avoiding Wikipedia's house style because some other mug will eventually do your work for you.  That, of course, works both ways.   +++$+++ ::I understand you; you're saying that you're deliberately avoiding Wikipedia's house style because some other mug will eventually do your work for you.  That, of course, works both ways.  [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 18:55, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
11024 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11021 +++$+++ 11022 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.299490260E09 +++$+++ Hi Shem, It is way more nuanced than that. First, I follow the house rules whenever they make sense, which is most of the time. Second, I do a lot of scut work too. I have been adding proper citations to many articles I did not write, as well as those I did. I do style and grammatical clean-up on many articles, especially those by non-native English speakers. On the ships, I often correct or fill-in ship boxes, including on articles I did not write. I have dug and found info not in Winfield with the result that I have on occasion had the opportunity to correct him. I also do clean-up on my own articles when I go back to them after a bit, ie when they are no longer fresh and I can see the errors. Overall, I believe that I am a pretty good citizen, with one bugaboo - certain house rules. Regards, +++$+++ ::Hi Shem, It is way more nuanced than that. First, I follow the house rules whenever they make sense, which is most of the time. Second, I do a lot of scut work too. I have been adding proper citations to many articles I did not write, as well as those I did. I do style and grammatical clean-up on many articles, especially those by non-native English speakers. On the ships, I often correct or fill-in ship boxes, including on articles I did not write. I have dug and found info not in Winfield with the result that I have on occasion had the opportunity to correct him. I also do clean-up on my own articles when I go back to them after a bit, ie when they are no longer fresh and I can see the errors. Overall, I believe that I am a pretty good citizen, with one bugaboo - certain house rules. Regards,[[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 01:31, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

535311 +++$+++ Joanot +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535311 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-27 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.159421820E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I only wanted to revert an edition made by Statelscop about the name of Valencia in English. I do not intend to remove your contribs about the Spanish autonomous cities. I'm sorry. -- +++$+++ Sorry, I only wanted to revert an edition made by Statelscop about the name of Valencia in English. I do not intend to remove your contribs about the Spanish autonomous cities. I'm sorry. --[[User:Joanot|Joanot Martorell]] <font size="+2">[[User_talk:Joanot|&#9993;]]</font> 22:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
535312 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535311 +++$+++ 535311 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.159421940E09 +++$+++ No problem. I thought I had reverted Satlescop's edit myself. Thanks for letting me know.  +++$+++ :No problem. I thought I had reverted Satlescop's edit myself. Thanks for letting me know. [[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''talk'''</font>]]</small></sup> 22:39, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

11025 +++$+++ Tirronan +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11025 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-01 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.299033660E09 +++$+++ Nicely done.  +++$+++ Nicely done. [[User:Tirronan|Tirronan]] ([[User talk:Tirronan|talk]]) 18:41, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
11026 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11025 +++$+++ 11025 +++$+++ 2011-03-01 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.299034380E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 18:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

11027 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-04 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.299293220E09 +++$+++ hi Acad - [[User:Viking1808\/The ship \u201cGrinder\u201d]] is now in my user space as a tentative draft article, where it can stay until something\/anything comes of English language sources.  It would still need some editing before going live, even then, but can act as an aide memoire.  Just in case the original report was wrong, do you have access to any lists of Swedish gunboats ? - they were known to be operating in the same waters.  What think you?  +++$+++ hi Acad - [[User:Viking1808/The ship “Grinder”]] is now in my user space as a tentative draft article, where it can stay until something/anything comes of English language sources.  It would still need some editing before going live, even then, but can act as an aide memoire.  Just in case the original report was wrong, do you have access to any lists of Swedish gunboats ? - they were known to be operating in the same waters.  What think you? [[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 18:47, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
11028 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11027 +++$+++ 11027 +++$+++ 2011-03-06 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.299451200E09 +++$+++ Rudi, the Dane, has looked at six different Swedish websites for GRINDER, KVARNEN (Swedish), or M\xd8LLEN (Danish) without success.  Likewise, the [http:\/\/www.threedecks.org\/ threedecks website] fails to come up with any of these three variations or anything like them.  +++$+++ :Rudi, the Dane, has looked at six different Swedish websites for GRINDER, KVARNEN (Swedish), or MØLLEN (Danish) without success.  Likewise, the [http://www.threedecks.org/ threedecks website] fails to come up with any of these three variations or anything like them. [[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 14:40, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

11030 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-15 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.300246860E09 +++$+++ Acad, please have a read of [[WP:PRIMARY]] and consider whether your use of the London Gazette and other primary sources is in the best interests of the encyclopaedia.  Thanks.   +++$+++ Acad, please have a read of [[WP:PRIMARY]] and consider whether your use of the London Gazette and other primary sources is in the best interests of the encyclopaedia.  Thanks.  [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 20:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
11031 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11030 +++$+++ 11030 +++$+++ 2011-03-15 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.300248960E09 +++$+++ On other matters - you win on medal inscriptions, if for no other reason than that I have no moral leg to stand on. I will correct them as I see them. I am going over the articles I have done and am rewriting to remove copyright issues. Fortunately, that is often easier than finding London Gazette letters. Regards,  +++$+++ :On other matters - you win on medal inscriptions, if for no other reason than that I have no moral leg to stand on. I will correct them as I see them. I am going over the articles I have done and am rewriting to remove copyright issues. Fortunately, that is often easier than finding London Gazette letters. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 21:16, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

401903 +++$+++ Yakushima +++$+++ Starblind +++$+++ 401903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-26 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.296066960E09 +++$+++ On [[Sedra Bistodeau]], however, I fear there's a rush to judgment. The initial AfD listing significantly understates her accomplishments. (\"15 year old fiddler and student that won a local state fair contest.\" [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Sedra_Bistodeau])  I've improved the citations, added some material.  This has moved me from neutral to Weak Keep, but it's possible I'm starting to get too close to the subject.  Briefly: she's won several national-level U.S. fiddling competitions, has been the sole subject of one RS newspaper article, and also of 5-1\/2 minutes of public television documentary (albeit metropolitan\/state TV, not national.)  Your added input on the discussion (per [[WP:MUSICBIO]] guidelines) would be welcome; it's possible she still falls short.  +++$+++ On [[Sedra Bistodeau]], however, I fear there's a rush to judgment. The initial AfD listing significantly understates her accomplishments. ("15 year old fiddler and student that won a local state fair contest." [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sedra_Bistodeau])  I've improved the citations, added some material.  This has moved me from neutral to Weak Keep, but it's possible I'm starting to get too close to the subject.  Briefly: she's won several national-level U.S. fiddling competitions, has been the sole subject of one RS newspaper article, and also of 5-1/2 minutes of public television documentary (albeit metropolitan/state TV, not national.)  Your added input on the discussion (per [[WP:MUSICBIO]] guidelines) would be welcome; it's possible she still falls short. [[User:Yakushima|Yakushima]] ([[User talk:Yakushima|talk]]) 10:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
401904 +++$+++ Starblind +++$+++ Starblind +++$+++ 401903 +++$+++ 401903 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.296291660E09 +++$+++ Your attempts to fix a questionable article have my respect, but I don't see anything so fundamentally different to reverse a vote.  It seems to come down to whether the \"National Old-Time Fiddlers Contest\" is enough to pass WP:MUSIC on its own, like, say, winning a Grammy would be.  I don't really think it is.  +++$+++ *Your attempts to fix a questionable article have my respect, but I don't see anything so fundamentally different to reverse a vote.  It seems to come down to whether the "National Old-Time Fiddlers Contest" is enough to pass WP:MUSIC on its own, like, say, winning a Grammy would be.  I don't really think it is. [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 01:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
401905 +++$+++ Yakushima +++$+++ Starblind +++$+++ 401903 +++$+++ 401904 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 10:12:00 +++$+++ 1.296843120E09 +++$+++ Well, if it would clarify matters, feel free to nominate [[National Old-Time Fiddlers Contest]] for deletion.  [[WP:MUSICBIO]] says the won\/placed contests have to be \"major\" -- maybe oldtime fiddling is irretrievably small-niche country music.  And we might agree that [[WP:N]] is necessary (though not necessarily sufficient) for a contest to be considered \"major\".  I'd even support a change to [[WP:MUSICBIO]], to make that clear.  I looked into the other national competition mentioned (which claims certification by National Oldtime Fiddlers' Contest (R)), and I suspect it hasn't quite gotten enough coverage for general notability.  Maybe ''no'' oldtime fiddling contest could meet the requirement of \"major\".  But with a 25,000 people showing up for the Weiser contest and its associated festival, how could anyone call it \"small\"?  +++$+++ **Well, if it would clarify matters, feel free to nominate [[National Old-Time Fiddlers Contest]] for deletion.  [[WP:MUSICBIO]] says the won/placed contests have to be "major" -- maybe oldtime fiddling is irretrievably small-niche country music.  And we might agree that [[WP:N]] is necessary (though not necessarily sufficient) for a contest to be considered "major".  I'd even support a change to [[WP:MUSICBIO]], to make that clear.  I looked into the other national competition mentioned (which claims certification by National Oldtime Fiddlers' Contest (R)), and I suspect it hasn't quite gotten enough coverage for general notability.  Maybe ''no'' oldtime fiddling contest could meet the requirement of "major".  But with a 25,000 people showing up for the Weiser contest and its associated festival, how could anyone call it "small"? [[User:Yakushima|Yakushima]] ([[User talk:Yakushima|talk]]) 10:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
401906 +++$+++ Starblind +++$+++ Starblind +++$+++ 401903 +++$+++ 401905 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.297141800E09 +++$+++ Firstly, it has nothing to do with genre.  Fiddling might be niche, but that in and of itself does not have any impact on notability or verifiability.  Indeed, I'd even say the opposite is true, that unusal performers if anything have an advantage because they make a potentially more interesting news story.  Teenager who wants to be like Britney Spears?  Who cares?  Teenager who's a virtuoso Siberian throat singer or accomplished at playing the [[Serpent (instrument)|serpent]]?  Send a reporter over there!  No, we have to look at the notability of the award and whether it can reasonably be said to confer notability on anyone who recieves it.  Grammy, sure.  Tony award, sure.  BRIT award, sure.  Fiddling contest [[National Oldtime Fiddlers' Contest|held in the local high-school gym]]?  Heck no.  +++$+++ ***Firstly, it has nothing to do with genre.  Fiddling might be niche, but that in and of itself does not have any impact on notability or verifiability.  Indeed, I'd even say the opposite is true, that unusal performers if anything have an advantage because they make a potentially more interesting news story.  Teenager who wants to be like Britney Spears?  Who cares?  Teenager who's a virtuoso Siberian throat singer or accomplished at playing the [[Serpent (instrument)|serpent]]?  Send a reporter over there!  No, we have to look at the notability of the award and whether it can reasonably be said to confer notability on anyone who recieves it.  Grammy, sure.  Tony award, sure.  BRIT award, sure.  Fiddling contest [[National Oldtime Fiddlers' Contest|held in the local high-school gym]]?  Heck no. [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 21:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

11032 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-15 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.300257900E09 +++$+++ Anyway, aware that I'm no more perfect than the next editor, and perhaps more prone to nit pick, I'll wish you good night. Yours,  +++$+++ Anyway, aware that I'm no more perfect than the next editor, and perhaps more prone to nit pick, I'll wish you good night. Yours, [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 23:45, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
11033 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11032 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.300308840E09 +++$+++ As for \"Old Weather\", that is cool, but first I have clean-up to do, plus one obsession at a time. Also, I would just end up looking for the non-weather items to pull into ship articles, and that really would cross the line into original research. Regards,  +++$+++ ::As for "Old Weather", that is cool, but first I have clean-up to do, plus one obsession at a time. Also, I would just end up looking for the non-weather items to pull into ship articles, and that really would cross the line into original research. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 13:54, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

535321 +++$+++ Taalo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-02 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.159858560E09 +++$+++ Asterion, please lets not have this go back to the German POV version.  For the past year Gryffindor has been pushing his agenda incrimentally.  Now we even have the Province of Bolzano listed as \"South Tyrol\".  I saw that you mentioned to Ryulong that this discussion has been ongoing.  But how can we let people who are trying to push a German POV just do this?  Bolzano-Bozen was switched to Bozen-Bolzano.  I mean, you just have to look some at what they have been doing to see their motives.  Gryffindor originally moved the page Trentino-Alto Adige himself on 25 Oct 2005 to Trentino-South Tyrol.  This should raise a flag right away that he is not partial in this.  You mention an agreement was reached before, but it was one that was reached by a majority of German\/Austrian users.  That, and... do we name Provinces now by consensus? I'm sorry, but I can not assume good intentions from the user Gryffindor.  I feel he abuses the Wikipedia system, and actually goes about it as a snake.  And sure, I'm going to get scolded for that last message, but, for goodness sake, aren't we required to stand up to this sort of stuff??  take care.  +++$+++ Asterion, please lets not have this go back to the German POV version.  For the past year Gryffindor has been pushing his agenda incrimentally.  Now we even have the Province of Bolzano listed as "South Tyrol".  I saw that you mentioned to Ryulong that this discussion has been ongoing.  But how can we let people who are trying to push a German POV just do this?  Bolzano-Bozen was switched to Bozen-Bolzano.  I mean, you just have to look some at what they have been doing to see their motives.  Gryffindor originally moved the page Trentino-Alto Adige himself on 25 Oct 2005 to Trentino-South Tyrol.  This should raise a flag right away that he is not partial in this.  You mention an agreement was reached before, but it was one that was reached by a majority of German/Austrian users.  That, and... do we name Provinces now by consensus? I'm sorry, but I can not assume good intentions from the user Gryffindor.  I feel he abuses the Wikipedia system, and actually goes about it as a snake.  And sure, I'm going to get scolded for that last message, but, for goodness sake, aren't we required to stand up to this sort of stuff??  take care. [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 23:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
535322 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535321 +++$+++ 535321 +++$+++ 2006-10-03 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.159920240E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Talk:Province of Bolzano (Bozen)]] for my reply. Regards,  +++$+++ :Please see [[Talk:Province of Bolzano (Bozen)]] for my reply. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''talk'''</font>]]</small></sup> 17:04, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
535323 +++$+++ Taalo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535321 +++$+++ 535322 +++$+++ 2006-10-03 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.159924620E09 +++$+++ Ok, replied.  As I'm learning the rules, I will definitely try my best to resolve this situation (which has been going on for a year).  Any explanation you need with regard to this region, etc. I can try to provide.  It is where my family is from afterall.  I just feel this nonsense and POV has to end.  A solution that has all parties satisfied should be what we look for, no?  Take care.  +++$+++ ::Ok, replied.  As I'm learning the rules, I will definitely try my best to resolve this situation (which has been going on for a year).  Any explanation you need with regard to this region, etc. I can try to provide.  It is where my family is from afterall.  I just feel this nonsense and POV has to end.  A solution that has all parties satisfied should be what we look for, no?  Take care. [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 18:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

11034 +++$+++ VernoWhitney +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-21 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.300754220E09 +++$+++ Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web -->  +++$+++ Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --> [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 17:37, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
11035 +++$+++ VernoWhitney +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11034 +++$+++ 11034 +++$+++ 2011-03-21 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.300754220E09 +++$+++ In looking through this article which was brought up on Shem's page I noticed some phrases which still closely resembled this page but that I was unable to find in the cited sources, such as \"'''anchored''' there where they hoped '''a battery of''' four '''guns and a mortar a gun in a tower'''\" where the source says \"anchored under the protection of a battery with guns and a mortar a gun in a tower\" (identical words bolded for emphasis). Do note that this is only one example, there are many places where the article seems to follow the language as closely and the language does not appear to be in the cited sources.  +++$+++ :In looking through this article which was brought up on Shem's page I noticed some phrases which still closely resembled this page but that I was unable to find in the cited sources, such as "'''anchored''' there where they hoped '''a battery of''' four '''guns and a mortar a gun in a tower'''" where the source says "anchored under the protection of a battery with guns and a mortar a gun in a tower" (identical words bolded for emphasis). Do note that this is only one example, there are many places where the article seems to follow the language as closely and the language does not appear to be in the cited sources. [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 17:37, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
11036 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11034 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-21 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.300765860E09 +++$+++ Hi VernoWhitney, I had amended that sentence to read \"Three enemy ships were anchored there where they hoped a battery of four guns and a mortar, a gun in a tower (possibly the Torra di Sagone) and some 200 troops with field pieces perched on the heights overlooking the anchorage might protect them.\" Here is what Phillips has: \"three enemy ships were anchored under the protection of a battery with 4 guns and a mortar, a gun in a tower and some 200 troops with field guns on the heights above.\" Here is what James (1837) said: \"lay at anchor in the bay of Sagone, island of Corsica, under the protection of a battery, mounting four guns and one mortar, and of a martello tower above the battery, mounting one gun.\" The original report reads \"as the Day opened we could clearly observe the Enemy in full Possesion of the Heights, and ready to receive us. He appeared to have about Two Hundred Regular Troops, with their Field Pieces, &c. and a Number of armed Inhabibitants; the Battery, consisting of Four Guns and One Mortar, presented a more formidable Appearance than I expected, and a Gun was mounted on the Martello Tower, above the Battery.\" The similarity in wording comes from the fact that we are all drawing from exactly the same original source. There are generally no other sources than the original letter in the ''London Gazette''. Marshall, the ''Naval Chronicle'' and the ''Gentleman{{'}}s Magazine'' all reproduce the original letter. I rearranged the words, and introduced the Torra di Sagone link. The question is how different does a sentence have to be to no longer violate copyright? The original and the James are in the public domain. Does Phillips establish copyright by rearranging the words in the original and James that a subsequent rearrangement and addition does not undo? I have been working through the ship articles I have written to move from Phillip's formulation by adding info, dropping info, converting passive voice to active voice, modernizing some of the  terms, and the like, but given that identical starting point and that we are describing the same facts there is only so much one can do. I am sincerely open to suggestion. +++$+++ :::Hi VernoWhitney, I had amended that sentence to read "Three enemy ships were anchored there where they hoped a battery of four guns and a mortar, a gun in a tower (possibly the Torra di Sagone) and some 200 troops with field pieces perched on the heights overlooking the anchorage might protect them." Here is what Phillips has: "three enemy ships were anchored under the protection of a battery with 4 guns and a mortar, a gun in a tower and some 200 troops with field guns on the heights above." Here is what James (1837) said: "lay at anchor in the bay of Sagone, island of Corsica, under the protection of a battery, mounting four guns and one mortar, and of a martello tower above the battery, mounting one gun." The original report reads "as the Day opened we could clearly observe the Enemy in full Possesion of the Heights, and ready to receive us. He appeared to have about Two Hundred Regular Troops, with their Field Pieces, &c. and a Number of armed Inhabibitants; the Battery, consisting of Four Guns and One Mortar, presented a more formidable Appearance than I expected, and a Gun was mounted on the Martello Tower, above the Battery." The similarity in wording comes from the fact that we are all drawing from exactly the same original source. There are generally no other sources than the original letter in the ''London Gazette''. Marshall, the ''Naval Chronicle'' and the ''Gentleman{{'}}s Magazine'' all reproduce the original letter. I rearranged the words, and introduced the Torra di Sagone link. The question is how different does a sentence have to be to no longer violate copyright? The original and the James are in the public domain. Does Phillips establish copyright by rearranging the words in the original and James that a subsequent rearrangement and addition does not undo? I have been working through the ship articles I have written to move from Phillip's formulation by adding info, dropping info, converting passive voice to active voice, modernizing some of the  terms, and the like, but given that identical starting point and that we are describing the same facts there is only so much one can do. I am sincerely open to suggestion.[[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 20:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
11037 +++$+++ VernoWhitney +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11034 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-22 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.300820160E09 +++$+++ Can you link to the source for that original report? I thought I was looking at the correct one, but I must have missed that part.  +++$+++ ::::Can you link to the source for that original report? I thought I was looking at the correct one, but I must have missed that part. [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 11:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
11038 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11034 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-22 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.300823220E09 +++$+++ Sure. The link is: {{London Gazette|startpage=1248|endpage=1250|issue=16502|date=6 July 1811}}. the story starts near the bottom of the second column on the first page and continues through to the third page. All the info is there about the names of the vessels, the number of troops, the battery with four guns and a mortar, the tower with one gun, the vessels catching on fire and setting fire to the battery, etc. Regards, +++$+++ ::::Sure. The link is: {{London Gazette|startpage=1248|endpage=1250|issue=16502|date=6 July 1811}}. the story starts near the bottom of the second column on the first page and continues through to the third page. All the info is there about the names of the vessels, the number of troops, the battery with four guns and a mortar, the tower with one gun, the vessels catching on fire and setting fire to the battery, etc. Regards,[[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 12:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
11039 +++$+++ The Land +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11034 +++$+++ 11035 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.301449680E09 +++$+++ I know you've discussed this with Shem (and others) at some length. But what we really need in these articles is original prose by you, not \"modified Phillips\". The only thing you can really do with text borrowed from Phillips is press the delete button and start over.   +++$+++ ::I know you've discussed this with Shem (and others) at some length. But what we really need in these articles is original prose by you, not "modified Phillips". The only thing you can really do with text borrowed from Phillips is press the delete button and start over.  [[User:The Land|The Land]] ([[User talk:The Land|talk]]) 18:48, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
11040 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11034 +++$+++ 11035 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.301471580E09 +++$+++ Hi TheLand, The problem is that Phillips is not the original author. The original author is usually the ship's captain who wrote the letter that appears in the ''London Gazette'', and frequently is copied in the ''Naval Chronicle'' or other contemporary newspaper. These accounts then form the basis for the accounts in James, Marshall, Norie, and others. That is, Phillips is a derivative work of works that are in the public domain. Many of his phrases are verbatim copies. I guess a better way of putting what I am doing is to say that where there is info from Phillips, I go back to the original source, which again is in the public domain, and then chop, change, modernize, add outside info, etc. That is, there are two derivative works, Phillips and mine, but both are derivative of the original in the public domain. And they have to be derivative of the original and parallel because there is no other source and there are limited options when describing a vessel of x guns, y crew, captured after a chase of z hours, the vessel having not taken any prizes, etc. The key point is that Phillips is not original but rather is derivative of material in the public domain. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Hi TheLand, The problem is that Phillips is not the original author. The original author is usually the ship's captain who wrote the letter that appears in the ''London Gazette'', and frequently is copied in the ''Naval Chronicle'' or other contemporary newspaper. These accounts then form the basis for the accounts in James, Marshall, Norie, and others. That is, Phillips is a derivative work of works that are in the public domain. Many of his phrases are verbatim copies. I guess a better way of putting what I am doing is to say that where there is info from Phillips, I go back to the original source, which again is in the public domain, and then chop, change, modernize, add outside info, etc. That is, there are two derivative works, Phillips and mine, but both are derivative of the original in the public domain. And they have to be derivative of the original and parallel because there is no other source and there are limited options when describing a vessel of x guns, y crew, captured after a chase of z hours, the vessel having not taken any prizes, etc. The key point is that Phillips is not original but rather is derivative of material in the public domain. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 00:53, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
11041 +++$+++ VernoWhitney +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11034 +++$+++ 11040 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.301472480E09 +++$+++ Just to be clear, there's no problem paraphrasing or even copying public domain sources so long as they are attributed, but Phillips' derivative work includes enough originality to be copyrighted, and so while your language will be similar to his (since you're both working from the same original logs), it needs to be separately derived from the PD source, not paraphrased from Phillips. {{user|Moonriddengirl}} has rewritten [[HMS Scout (1804)]] to separate it from Phillips, and she may have some better advice, but my advice would be to simply avoid looking at Phillips entirely, since he's not (as far as I can see) providing any new information that's not in the PD sources.  +++$+++ :::Just to be clear, there's no problem paraphrasing or even copying public domain sources so long as they are attributed, but Phillips' derivative work includes enough originality to be copyrighted, and so while your language will be similar to his (since you're both working from the same original logs), it needs to be separately derived from the PD source, not paraphrased from Phillips. {{user|Moonriddengirl}} has rewritten [[HMS Scout (1804)]] to separate it from Phillips, and she may have some better advice, but my advice would be to simply avoid looking at Phillips entirely, since he's not (as far as I can see) providing any new information that's not in the PD sources. [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 01:08, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
11042 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11034 +++$+++ 11041 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.301473020E09 +++$+++ Basically, that's what I am now doing by going back to the originals. Regards,  +++$+++ ::::Basically, that's what I am now doing by going back to the originals. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 01:17, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
11043 +++$+++ The Land +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11034 +++$+++ 11041 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.301507460E09 +++$+++ Can I ask you to make a list of all the articles where you have added content that is a rewritten version of Phillips. Then we can address the problems article by article. There is evidently still a significant job of clean-up to do and it will be much easier for all concerned (including you) if it happens with your cooperation, than if it happens without it.  +++$+++ ::::Can I ask you to make a list of all the articles where you have added content that is a rewritten version of Phillips. Then we can address the problems article by article. There is evidently still a significant job of clean-up to do and it will be much easier for all concerned (including you) if it happens with your cooperation, than if it happens without it. [[User:The Land|The Land]] ([[User talk:The Land|talk]]) 10:51, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
11044 +++$+++ The Land +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11034 +++$+++ 11035 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.301528940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that. I'm pretty sure this is the best way to proceed. I have invited [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ships#Copyright_cleanup_-_assistance_please|other Ships editors to get involved]] in checking these articles.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for that. I'm pretty sure this is the best way to proceed. I have invited [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ships#Copyright_cleanup_-_assistance_please|other Ships editors to get involved]] in checking these articles. [[User:The Land|The Land]] ([[User talk:The Land|talk]]) 16:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

585213 +++$+++ Thegingerone +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-19 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.205994360E09 +++$+++ Im having trouble with another user on the [[Rudolph Valentino]] page.  User [[User_talk:Kevin_j|Kevin_j]] keeps reverting good edits; replacing them with lesser sources (tabloid styled 'biographies') and keeps leaving nasty messages on my talk page.  Im not good with Wikipedia hierarchy.  Please help!-- +++$+++ Im having trouble with another user on the [[Rudolph Valentino]] page.  User [[User_talk:Kevin_j|Kevin_j]] keeps reverting good edits; replacing them with lesser sources (tabloid styled 'biographies') and keeps leaving nasty messages on my talk page.  Im not good with Wikipedia hierarchy.  Please help!--[[User:Thegingerone|Thegingerone]] ([[User talk:Thegingerone|talk]]) 23:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
585214 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585213 +++$+++ 585213 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.206002340E09 +++$+++ I've fully-protected the page for now. Please discuss on the article's talk page, and, if necessary, see [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] rather than revert-war. Thank you.  +++$+++ :I've fully-protected the page for now. Please discuss on the article's talk page, and, if necessary, see [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] rather than revert-war. Thank you. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 01:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

535325 +++$+++ Gryffindor +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535325 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-03 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.159935540E09 +++$+++ I am glad you asked me this because I had the suspicion all along, but considering the barrage of personal attacks I have been under I wasn't going to say it out loud otherwise more abuse would have probably come. I have a number of suspects that I was going to give in for inspection, wasn't there some programme by some user who can check up on these things, including I.P. addresses? thanks for your help, I really appreciate it.  +++$+++ I am glad you asked me this because I had the suspicion all along, but considering the barrage of personal attacks I have been under I wasn't going to say it out loud otherwise more abuse would have probably come. I have a number of suspects that I was going to give in for inspection, wasn't there some programme by some user who can check up on these things, including I.P. addresses? thanks for your help, I really appreciate it. [[User:Gryffindor|<font color="red">Gryffindor</font>]] 21:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
535326 +++$+++ Gryffindor +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535325 +++$+++ 535325 +++$+++ 2006-10-03 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.159936200E09 +++$+++ Exactly! Thanks alot... I unfortunately have to log myself out again in a second, won't be able to take care of this until tomorrow... do you think you could do me the honour?  +++$+++ :Exactly! Thanks alot... I unfortunately have to log myself out again in a second, won't be able to take care of this until tomorrow... do you think you could do me the honour? [[User:Gryffindor|<font color="red">Gryffindor</font>]] 21:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
535327 +++$+++ Taalo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535325 +++$+++ 535326 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.159945860E09 +++$+++ HAH, I think this is the first time I have agreed with you '''ever''' Gryffindor.  There is hope!  I did also have suspicion that at least one user is a sockpuppet.  I noticed one user just registered and cast a vote '''supporting'''.  I sincerely hope that it is not a misguided attempt to influence the discussion, because for once we need to be '''honest''' about this and discuss it professionally -- and not taint things like this. Oh, did you read that last sentence of mine their buddy? ^_-  I have been attacking what you have done Gryffindor, not you personally.  I'm sorry, but the purpose also of '''being firm''' is to confront people when they do things which appear to be dubious.  Sorry, but there is no blank check on here under the cover of the concepts of assuming the best.  later.  +++$+++ ::HAH, I think this is the first time I have agreed with you '''ever''' Gryffindor.  There is hope!  I did also have suspicion that at least one user is a sockpuppet.  I noticed one user just registered and cast a vote '''supporting'''.  I sincerely hope that it is not a misguided attempt to influence the discussion, because for once we need to be '''honest''' about this and discuss it professionally -- and not taint things like this. Oh, did you read that last sentence of mine their buddy? ^_-  I have been attacking what you have done Gryffindor, not you personally.  I'm sorry, but the purpose also of '''being firm''' is to confront people when they do things which appear to be dubious.  Sorry, but there is no blank check on here under the cover of the concepts of assuming the best.  later. [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 00:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
535328 +++$+++ Taalo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535325 +++$+++ 535327 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.159946160E09 +++$+++ The obvious suspect being [[User:Vargwilku|Vargwilku]].  Anyway, I really hope it is not the case of a misguided attempt to help this cause.  This is really pitifull.  Thanks a lot Gryffi for creating this farce with regard to the region I call home.  Really appreciate it there buddy. Ooops I'm gonna get scolded again because ultra sensitives will say this is a personal attack. *roll eyes* ciao ciao.  +++$+++ :::The obvious suspect being [[User:Vargwilku|Vargwilku]].  Anyway, I really hope it is not the case of a misguided attempt to help this cause.  This is really pitifull.  Thanks a lot Gryffi for creating this farce with regard to the region I call home.  Really appreciate it there buddy. Ooops I'm gonna get scolded again because ultra sensitives will say this is a personal attack. *roll eyes* ciao ciao. [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 00:16, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
535329 +++$+++ Taalo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535325 +++$+++ 535327 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.159961160E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that last post Gryf.  While I do not appreciate what you have done, I don't want to be this angry.  take care.  +++$+++ :::Sorry about that last post Gryf.  While I do not appreciate what you have done, I don't want to be this angry.  take care. [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 04:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
535330 +++$+++ Taalo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535325 +++$+++ 535329 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.159946820E09 +++$+++ Actually, given I assume this may be (hopefully not, but yeah, it is too suspicious) some misguided attempt to boost the voting, I'll try to see who it is and ask them to just come clean, and ditch the b.s.  I for one must say I don't even believe in this yes\/no voting.  Not only does it open things up to sockpuppets, meatpuppets, etc.  It just allows '''user groups''' to vote in their POV.  I'll post a warning on the page.  Asterion, one note.  I hope you can get at least a bit of an impression that I want these pages to most fairly reflect these regions.  Please feel free to message me also with such concerns.  I know my \"login\" time is short, but I'm just trying my best.  Apologies if I'm wary of Gryffindor.. but actions do speak louder than words.  regards.  +++$+++ ::::Actually, given I assume this may be (hopefully not, but yeah, it is too suspicious) some misguided attempt to boost the voting, I'll try to see who it is and ask them to just come clean, and ditch the b.s.  I for one must say I don't even believe in this yes/no voting.  Not only does it open things up to sockpuppets, meatpuppets, etc.  It just allows '''user groups''' to vote in their POV.  I'll post a warning on the page.  Asterion, one note.  I hope you can get at least a bit of an impression that I want these pages to most fairly reflect these regions.  Please feel free to message me also with such concerns.  I know my "login" time is short, but I'm just trying my best.  Apologies if I'm wary of Gryffindor.. but actions do speak louder than words.  regards. [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 00:27, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
535331 +++$+++ Taalo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535325 +++$+++ 535329 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.159947120E09 +++$+++ DONE.  +++$+++ ::::DONE. [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 00:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
535332 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535325 +++$+++ 535331 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.159969020E09 +++$+++ Taalo, please stop using my talk page to reply to other people's comments. I have a policy of conducting all discussion about articles on the talk page of that article. If you post a comment on my user talk page about a particular article, I will not respond here but in the talk page of the article in question. Nonetheless, I suspect foul play going on, be sure I will get to the bottom of it, via checkuser or some other means (I have not pointed the finger at anyone, by the way). Regards,  +++$+++ :::::Taalo, please stop using my talk page to reply to other people's comments. I have a policy of conducting all discussion about articles on the talk page of that article. If you post a comment on my user talk page about a particular article, I will not respond here but in the talk page of the article in question. Nonetheless, I suspect foul play going on, be sure I will get to the bottom of it, via checkuser or some other means (I have not pointed the finger at anyone, by the way). Regards, [[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''talk'''</font>]]</small></sup> 06:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
535333 +++$+++ Taalo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535325 +++$+++ 535332 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.159969200E09 +++$+++ My humble apologies Asterion.  I didn't realize your policy, nevertheless, I'm sorry.  Yeah, and if you know how to figure out what is going on, please do take care of it, as I don't even know how.  I just posted a warning not to be silly like this.  Regardless, I'm learning a whole lot of stuff about my own region through all this.  I just hope everyone can also learn -- and try to remove any politics\/nationalism, etc.  Again, sorry, and also thanks for being involved in all this.  Out of all of this, I miss visiting the area most of all.  my best regards.  +++$+++ ::::::My humble apologies Asterion.  I didn't realize your policy, nevertheless, I'm sorry.  Yeah, and if you know how to figure out what is going on, please do take care of it, as I don't even know how.  I just posted a warning not to be silly like this.  Regardless, I'm learning a whole lot of stuff about my own region through all this.  I just hope everyone can also learn -- and try to remove any politics/nationalism, etc.  Again, sorry, and also thanks for being involved in all this.  Out of all of this, I miss visiting the area most of all.  my best regards. [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 06:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
535334 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535325 +++$+++ 535333 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.159969740E09 +++$+++ This is fine, Taalo. We need a general discussion place for this subject, instead so many individual \"requested moves\". I will ask for advice on this from other uninvolved parties. Maybe a subpage hanging from [[Talk:South Tyrol\/Dual name controversy]] or something along the lines. As it stands, the discussions are spread all around and it is quite chaotic. I would also suggest some sort of mediation by uninvolved parties, if you all accept. Regards,  +++$+++ :::::::This is fine, Taalo. We need a general discussion place for this subject, instead so many individual "requested moves". I will ask for advice on this from other uninvolved parties. Maybe a subpage hanging from [[Talk:South Tyrol/Dual name controversy]] or something along the lines. As it stands, the discussions are spread all around and it is quite chaotic. I would also suggest some sort of mediation by uninvolved parties, if you all accept. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''talk'''</font>]]</small></sup> 06:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
535335 +++$+++ Taalo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535325 +++$+++ 535334 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.159971000E09 +++$+++ Amen, I'm about to go nuts.  I wish we just were all sitting around a table.  Anyway, I've tried to do the best work I can with this.  I hope we just get to something acceptable.  I think having some uninvolved parties help us would be great.  I can only hope we come up with a fair and neutral situation where everyone can be happy (year right).  Well, I can hope.  Again, sorry for posting on your talk page if this is wrong again.  regards.  +++$+++ ::::::::Amen, I'm about to go nuts.  I wish we just were all sitting around a table.  Anyway, I've tried to do the best work I can with this.  I hope we just get to something acceptable.  I think having some uninvolved parties help us would be great.  I can only hope we come up with a fair and neutral situation where everyone can be happy (year right).  Well, I can hope.  Again, sorry for posting on your talk page if this is wrong again.  regards. [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 07:10, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

482437 +++$+++ Mets4117 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482437 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-31 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.170308820E09 +++$+++ Can you help with it, clean it up. -- +++$+++ Can you help with it, clean it up. --[[User:Mets4117|Mets4117]] 21:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
482438 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482437 +++$+++ 482437 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.170311880E09 +++$+++ In all honesty, the subject matter doesn't interest me too much, sorry.  \u2014 +++$+++ :In all honesty, the subject matter doesn't interest me too much, sorry.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 22:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

273184 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-03 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.165215420E09 +++$+++ Hello fellow Alliance member.  I guess I have indeed joined the Alliance. =)  Thank you for you support with my RfA.  My nomination succeeded.  It's an honor to join the admin ranks and I can only hope that I do as good of a job as you do.  I appreciate all your help.  Thanks again! =) --  +++$+++ Hello fellow Alliance member.  I guess I have indeed joined the Alliance. =)  Thank you for you support with my RfA.  My nomination succeeded.  It's an honor to join the admin ranks and I can only hope that I do as good of a job as you do.  I appreciate all your help.  Thanks again! =) -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 22:57, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
273185 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273184 +++$+++ 273184 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.165296420E09 +++$+++ Re [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGogo_Dodo&diff=92001138&oldid=91949118 your message]: Thanks.  I'm taking things real slow and reading up on things before I do anything.  Still rather weird seeing all these extra buttons.  Seeing Delete on the Main Page just plain freaks me out.  As for the cake, well, Dfrg.msc brought.  You'll have to ask him about the name. ;) --  +++$+++ :Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGogo_Dodo&diff=92001138&oldid=91949118 your message]: Thanks.  I'm taking things real slow and reading up on things before I do anything.  Still rather weird seeing all these extra buttons.  Seeing Delete on the Main Page just plain freaks me out.  As for the cake, well, Dfrg.msc brought.  You'll have to ask him about the name. ;) -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 21:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

273187 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273187 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-05 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.165305840E09 +++$+++ Oh, that wasn't the least of it.  Simonapro tried to open an arbcase against me, too.  BTW, a number of editors, including myself, are having problems with an Eddie-type vandal:  {{IPVandal|69.119.119.178}}.  This has been going on for over a year, and as you can see, the most recent block was for six months.  Can you suggest the best course of action for implementing another long-term block?  User has been warned by at least three different editors in the last 24 hours with no effect. Thank you.&mdash; +++$+++ Oh, that wasn't the least of it.  Simonapro tried to open an arbcase against me, too.  BTW, a number of editors, including myself, are having problems with an Eddie-type vandal:  {{IPVandal|69.119.119.178}}.  This has been going on for over a year, and as you can see, the most recent block was for six months.  Can you suggest the best course of action for implementing another long-term block?  User has been warned by at least three different editors in the last 24 hours with no effect. Thank you.&mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 00:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
273188 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273187 +++$+++ 273187 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.165309440E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Sarah. [[User:Cognita]] and [[User:JimDunning]] will be pleased.  It's up to you, but if you want to tell them, I'm sure they will be very grateful for your time...as am I. &mdash; +++$+++ :Thanks, Sarah. [[User:Cognita]] and [[User:JimDunning]] will be pleased.  It's up to you, but if you want to tell them, I'm sure they will be very grateful for your time...as am I. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 01:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
273189 +++$+++ JimDunning +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273187 +++$+++ 273187 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.165313580E09 +++$+++ Jim is pleased. Based on this guy's contribution history and logs this has been a consistent pattern for a couple years now. I don't think (s)he's a true malicious vandal, but some kind of obsessive celebrity gossip updater -- most of the contributions are trivia and seem to come from movie fan gossip websites and message boards. He apparently doesn't care whether the speculations and gossip he cites ever turn out to be true (and most are outdated). I suspect he may have actually read someplace that there was going to be a young Angier in The Prestige and felt compelled to include it in the article. Ninety-five percent of his contributions are similar. Is there a way to permanently block him? It's obvious that as soon as the block lifts he will go on a 100-edit spree again. I'm going to review all of his past edits to movie articles and fix where possible and necessary. Thanks!   +++$+++ :Jim is pleased. Based on this guy's contribution history and logs this has been a consistent pattern for a couple years now. I don't think (s)he's a true malicious vandal, but some kind of obsessive celebrity gossip updater -- most of the contributions are trivia and seem to come from movie fan gossip websites and message boards. He apparently doesn't care whether the speculations and gossip he cites ever turn out to be true (and most are outdated). I suspect he may have actually read someplace that there was going to be a young Angier in The Prestige and felt compelled to include it in the article. Ninety-five percent of his contributions are similar. Is there a way to permanently block him? It's obvious that as soon as the block lifts he will go on a 100-edit spree again. I'm going to review all of his past edits to movie articles and fix where possible and necessary. Thanks!  [[User:JimDunning|Jim Dunning]] 02:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
273190 +++$+++ Cognita +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273187 +++$+++ 273189 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.165314900E09 +++$+++ Cognita is pleased, too. Thank you for shooing that housefly out the window! Additional information is relevant. The specifics of the vandalism: 69.119 inserted two child actors into the Cast section of [[The Prestige (film)]] who weren't in the cast. Their names were Zach Tyler Eisen (age 13) and [another child, whose age was given]. He also added a sentence in the Plot section describing something that wasn't in the film, an alleged event in the childhood of an adult character, apparently to justify the addition of the male child actor in Cast. Now, WP has a page on Zach Tyler Eisen that's been chosen for deletion as a biography of a nonnotable person, but it's still there. The page describes Zach as a child actor (and a middle-school student) and says he has a sister [and gives additional info]. Can you guess who I think was posting from 69.119.119.178?  +++$+++ ::Cognita is pleased, too. Thank you for shooing that housefly out the window! Additional information is relevant. The specifics of the vandalism: 69.119 inserted two child actors into the Cast section of [[The Prestige (film)]] who weren't in the cast. Their names were Zach Tyler Eisen (age 13) and [another child, whose age was given]. He also added a sentence in the Plot section describing something that wasn't in the film, an alleged event in the childhood of an adult character, apparently to justify the addition of the male child actor in Cast. Now, WP has a page on Zach Tyler Eisen that's been chosen for deletion as a biography of a nonnotable person, but it's still there. The page describes Zach as a child actor (and a middle-school student) and says he has a sister [and gives additional info]. Can you guess who I think was posting from 69.119.119.178? [[User:Cognita|Cognita]] 02:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
273191 +++$+++ JimDunning +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273187 +++$+++ 273190 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.165319340E09 +++$+++ Well, Watson, since the IP address tracks back to Stamford, CT ''and'' the article on young, talented Zack says he attends Cloonan Middle School, which also is located in same Stamford, CT, we can conclude young Zack has far too much time on his hands. What's wierd is that there is an [http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0878940\/ IMDB entry] on him, so he may really be in the movie business (although there's some conflicting info); but if he really is an actor, why does he feel the need to self-aggrandize? Anyways, wouldn't his parents C___ and L___ get a kick receiving a letter regarding their son's online activities.   +++$+++ :::Well, Watson, since the IP address tracks back to Stamford, CT ''and'' the article on young, talented Zack says he attends Cloonan Middle School, which also is located in same Stamford, CT, we can conclude young Zack has far too much time on his hands. What's wierd is that there is an [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0878940/ IMDB entry] on him, so he may really be in the movie business (although there's some conflicting info); but if he really is an actor, why does he feel the need to self-aggrandize? Anyways, wouldn't his parents C___ and L___ get a kick receiving a letter regarding their son's online activities.  [[User:JimDunning|Jim Dunning]] 03:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
273192 +++$+++ Cognita +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273187 +++$+++ 273189 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.165332720E09 +++$+++ He has a father? His user page listed only his mother and sister under \"Family,\" as of yesterday, anyway. And the gratuitous sentence he inserted in Plot said the father of the boy he represented himself as playing died. Hmm \u2013 Oedipal stuff, perhaps. Do his changes to other pages than [[The Prestige]] have similar content? Maybe a letter should go to the school because private individuals get justifiably scared when strangers ferret out their home addresses online, whereas a school is a public institution. Or maybe a letter to either place would violate policies here against nonconsensual real-world contacting.  +++$+++ ::He has a father? His user page listed only his mother and sister under "Family," as of yesterday, anyway. And the gratuitous sentence he inserted in Plot said the father of the boy he represented himself as playing died. Hmm – Oedipal stuff, perhaps. Do his changes to other pages than [[The Prestige]] have similar content? Maybe a letter should go to the school because private individuals get justifiably scared when strangers ferret out their home addresses online, whereas a school is a public institution. Or maybe a letter to either place would violate policies here against nonconsensual real-world contacting. [[User:Cognita|Cognita]] 07:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
273193 +++$+++ Cognita +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273187 +++$+++ 273192 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.165334280E09 +++$+++ Oh, crap. Something else just occurred to me. I checked, uh, somewhere and found the family's address easily. Zach's autobiographical article mentions his sister \u2013 and it's a really bad idea to tell the online world where a small child lives, although we couldn't expect someone Zach's age to think of that even if he were conscientious, which he isn't. I think this is a good reason to get his article removed immediately. How does one make that happen?  +++$+++ :::Oh, crap. Something else just occurred to me. I checked, uh, somewhere and found the family's address easily. Zach's autobiographical article mentions his sister – and it's a really bad idea to tell the online world where a small child lives, although we couldn't expect someone Zach's age to think of that even if he were conscientious, which he isn't. I think this is a good reason to get his article removed immediately. How does one make that happen? [[User:Cognita|Cognita]] 07:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
273194 +++$+++ JimDunning +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273187 +++$+++ 273192 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.165353600E09 +++$+++ I had the same thoughts -- I googled his address\/phone and parents' names easily\/quickly just based on tracing his IP and the mention of the middle school. Since his edits have a way of pissing off people it might not be a bad idea to remove all references to him in WP. Of course, that doesn't take care of the million other places on the Web he's advertised himself . . . .   +++$+++ :::I had the same thoughts -- I googled his address/phone and parents' names easily/quickly just based on tracing his IP and the mention of the middle school. Since his edits have a way of pissing off people it might not be a bad idea to remove all references to him in WP. Of course, that doesn't take care of the million other places on the Web he's advertised himself . . . .  [[User:JimDunning|Jim Dunning]] 13:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
273195 +++$+++ JimDunning +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273187 +++$+++ 273194 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.165353780E09 +++$+++ So, how do you get a page removed completely so even the past version disappears?  +++$+++ ::::So, how do you get a page removed completely so even the past version disappears? [[User:JimDunning|Jim Dunning]] 13:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
273196 +++$+++ Cognita +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273187 +++$+++ 273189 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.165374300E09 +++$+++ If an article is removed, I think the past versions go away with it. I don't know why articles flagged for deletion remain so long. We need an admin's help.  +++$+++ ::If an article is removed, I think the past versions go away with it. I don't know why articles flagged for deletion remain so long. We need an admin's help. [[User:Cognita|Cognita]] 19:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

11046 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-30 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.301519220E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 14:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
11047 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11046 +++$+++ 11046 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.301639520E09 +++$+++ [[HMS Amfitrite (1804)]]  +++$+++ *[[HMS Amfitrite (1804)]] [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 23:32, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

11049 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-12 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.302668100E09 +++$+++ Acad, I've given {{HMS|Magnet|1807|2}} an infobox; I'd be grateful if you'd adjust the dimensions to those \"as built\" from Winfield.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Acad, I've given {{HMS|Magnet|1807|2}} an infobox; I'd be grateful if you'd adjust the dimensions to those "as built" from Winfield.  Thanks, [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 21:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
11050 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11049 +++$+++ 11049 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.302684180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the infobox. Unfortunately, Rif doesn't ahvee any \"as built\" data for ''Magnet''. I checked. Incidentally, I am moving the prize money details to the footnotes, as you prefer. I finally figured out how to do it while retaining the source citation, which was what was keeping me from doing it earlier. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks for the infobox. Unfortunately, Rif doesn't ahvee any "as built" data for ''Magnet''. I checked. Incidentally, I am moving the prize money details to the footnotes, as you prefer. I finally figured out how to do it while retaining the source citation, which was what was keeping me from doing it earlier. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 01:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
11051 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11049 +++$+++ 11050 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 07:17:00 +++$+++ 1.302704220E09 +++$+++ How are you doing that?  I couldn't get [[WP:REFNEST]] to work, and would be grateful to see a working example.  +++$+++ ::How are you doing that?  I couldn't get [[WP:REFNEST]] to work, and would be grateful to see a working example. [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 07:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
11052 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11049 +++$+++ 11051 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.302724440E09 +++$+++ This probably only works for things like the ''London Gazette'' template. If you look at {{HMS|Minerva|1780|2}} you will see what I did. Basically, all it involved was removing the beginning and end refs tags from around the LG template. It's a limited fix but sufficient for my purposes re the prize money. +++$+++ :::This probably only works for things like the ''London Gazette'' template. If you look at {{HMS|Minerva|1780|2}} you will see what I did. Basically, all it involved was removing the beginning and end refs tags from around the LG template. It's a limited fix but sufficient for my purposes re the prize money.[[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 12:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
11053 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11049 +++$+++ 11052 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.302750000E09 +++$+++ I finally worked out how to use [[WP:REFNEST]]; if you're interested, see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=HMS_Minerva_%281780%29&action=historysubmit&diff=423913069&oldid=423737279|this edit] to {{HMS|Minerva|1780|2}}.   +++$+++ ::::I finally worked out how to use [[WP:REFNEST]]; if you're interested, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Minerva_%281780%29&action=historysubmit&diff=423913069&oldid=423737279|this edit] to {{HMS|Minerva|1780|2}}.  [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 20:00, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
11054 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11049 +++$+++ 11052 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.302750540E09 +++$+++ Great. Seems straightforward. I will implement this as I go over the articles. Thanks. +++$+++ ::::Great. Seems straightforward. I will implement this as I go over the articles. Thanks.[[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 20:09, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
11055 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11049 +++$+++ 11052 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.302751380E09 +++$+++ Tried it and it works a charm. Took me a couple of tries to get it right on {{HMS|Zebra|1780|2}} but I think I have the hang of it now. Just need to watch out for typos. +++$+++ ::::Tried it and it works a charm. Took me a couple of tries to get it right on {{HMS|Zebra|1780|2}} but I think I have the hang of it now. Just need to watch out for typos.[[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 20:23, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
11056 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11049 +++$+++ 11055 +++$+++ 2011-04-14 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.302836280E09 +++$+++ I think the details of prize money sit well in the notes rather than the text (it certainly gets round my strong feeling that it's unencyclopaedic), and the ability to cite the notes is useful.  It took me a while to figure out, though!  I think I'll add some info to [[WP:REFNEST]] to help those trying to do the same thing.  +++$+++ :::::I think the details of prize money sit well in the notes rather than the text (it certainly gets round my strong feeling that it's unencyclopaedic), and the ability to cite the notes is useful.  It took me a while to figure out, though!  I think I'll add some info to [[WP:REFNEST]] to help those trying to do the same thing. [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 19:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
11057 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11049 +++$+++ 11055 +++$+++ 2011-04-14 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.302839160E09 +++$+++ Fully agree re footnotes. It is where I would have put the info if I had figured out even my kludge earlier. Having the prize money info does provide another view on the roles of Royal Navy, and of captains as CEOs of potentially money-earning enterprises. The sources could be useful to someone interested in the topic of prize money because often there is info on all eight classes of shares. +++$+++ :::::Fully agree re footnotes. It is where I would have put the info if I had figured out even my kludge earlier. Having the prize money info does provide another view on the roles of Royal Navy, and of captains as CEOs of potentially money-earning enterprises. The sources could be useful to someone interested in the topic of prize money because often there is info on all eight classes of shares.[[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 20:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

535339 +++$+++ Taalo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-05 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.160093040E09 +++$+++ Hi Asterion, we won't ever get a neutral solution this way with the region, province and town pages of this area.  Can you help me get some mature and neutral admins involved?  Someone that can help run the discussion maybe.  I can see how there can be debate in using Trentino-Alto Adige or Trentino-South Tyrol.  But for the province, it is definitely the Province of Bolzano.  The area is South Tyrol, for sure, but we can't go renaming provinces and states to fit some users opinions.  Everything is just being voted on by national lines almost.  The funny thing is I have never seen an English map that has anything but Bolzano and Trento as the two provinces.  We shouldn't use Wikipedia to try and rewrite things.  I hope there are not many more cases of this on Wikipedia.. but somehow I'd guess there are a lot. Anyway, help us Asterion, please.  Very few seem to want to look at both sides of the issue or even re-evaluate their ''opinions''.  take care. ciao.  +++$+++ Hi Asterion, we won't ever get a neutral solution this way with the region, province and town pages of this area.  Can you help me get some mature and neutral admins involved?  Someone that can help run the discussion maybe.  I can see how there can be debate in using Trentino-Alto Adige or Trentino-South Tyrol.  But for the province, it is definitely the Province of Bolzano.  The area is South Tyrol, for sure, but we can't go renaming provinces and states to fit some users opinions.  Everything is just being voted on by national lines almost.  The funny thing is I have never seen an English map that has anything but Bolzano and Trento as the two provinces.  We shouldn't use Wikipedia to try and rewrite things.  I hope there are not many more cases of this on Wikipedia.. but somehow I'd guess there are a lot. Anyway, help us Asterion, please.  Very few seem to want to look at both sides of the issue or even re-evaluate their ''opinions''.  take care. ciao. [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 17:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
535340 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535339 +++$+++ 535339 +++$+++ 2006-10-05 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.160104140E09 +++$+++ Hi Taalo. Personally, I agree that the province should be referred as Province of Bolzano, but the most common name in English for the area\/region is South Tyrol. Regarding getting some admins involved, Dijxtra raised the issue in the Administrators' Noticeboard. If nothing happens, you could agree with all the other participants in the talk page to [[WP:RfM|request mediation]]. I will be in Seville from this Saturday till Monday 16th, so I'm not really sure if I'll get a chance to check wikipedia at all. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Taalo. Personally, I agree that the province should be referred as Province of Bolzano, but the most common name in English for the area/region is South Tyrol. Regarding getting some admins involved, Dijxtra raised the issue in the Administrators' Noticeboard. If nothing happens, you could agree with all the other participants in the talk page to [[WP:RfM|request mediation]]. I will be in Seville from this Saturday till Monday 16th, so I'm not really sure if I'll get a chance to check wikipedia at all. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''talk'''</font>]]</small></sup> 20:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
535341 +++$+++ Taalo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535339 +++$+++ 535340 +++$+++ 2006-10-06 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.160199660E09 +++$+++ Hi Asterion, yup, we've already had someone come and offer to help find a solution.  Feel really happy to see this sort of effort.  Actually, have no disagreement with you.  The province is Bolzano, the city is Bolzano, the ''area\/region'' is Alto Adige-Suedtirol (aka South Tyrol).  Hopefully we can come up with a way to have a ''province'' page like we have for every other Italian province, and at the same time have an section or page to discuss \"South Tyrol\" (though I feel most of this can be, and has been done, on Trentino-Alto Adige\/Trentino-South Tyrol.  Anyway, this is boring with regards to a nice trip, so enjoy your vacation in Seville.  my regards. ciao  +++$+++ ::Hi Asterion, yup, we've already had someone come and offer to help find a solution.  Feel really happy to see this sort of effort.  Actually, have no disagreement with you.  The province is Bolzano, the city is Bolzano, the ''area/region'' is Alto Adige-Suedtirol (aka South Tyrol).  Hopefully we can come up with a way to have a ''province'' page like we have for every other Italian province, and at the same time have an section or page to discuss "South Tyrol" (though I feel most of this can be, and has been done, on Trentino-Alto Adige/Trentino-South Tyrol.  Anyway, this is boring with regards to a nice trip, so enjoy your vacation in Seville.  my regards. ciao [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 22:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

526130 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-31 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.154341380E09 +++$+++ I am very happy for you.  I always had faith in you and I know that you will be a great Admin.  +++$+++ I am very happy for you.  I always had faith in you and I know that you will be a great Admin. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
526131 +++$+++ Yanksox +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526130 +++$+++ 526130 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.154344260E09 +++$+++ More congrats, welcome to the club!  +++$+++ :More congrats, welcome to the club! [[User:Yanksox|<font color="black">Yank</font>]][[User talk:Yanksox|<font color="red">sox</font>]] 04:11, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
526132 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526130 +++$+++ 526131 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.154376300E09 +++$+++ Let me jump on the bandwagon and say congratulations and well deserved.  No one deserved it more.-- +++$+++ ::Let me jump on the bandwagon and say congratulations and well deserved.  No one deserved it more.--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 13:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
526133 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526130 +++$+++ 526130 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.154408220E09 +++$+++ Congratulations!  Enjoy your shiny new buttons!  +++$+++ :Congratulations!  Enjoy your shiny new buttons! [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 21:57, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

273198 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.165403280E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I would appreciate your comment and endorsement of an attempt to resolve: [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Jance]].  Thanks a bunch --  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I would appreciate your comment and endorsement of an attempt to resolve: [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jance]].  Thanks a bunch -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|'''Samir''' <small>धर्म</small>]] 03:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
273199 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273198 +++$+++ 273198 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.165404480E09 +++$+++ Oops, signed the wrong place!  Thanks!! --  +++$+++ :Oops, signed the wrong place!  Thanks!! -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|'''Samir''' <small>धर्म</small>]] 03:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

307677 +++$+++ AYArktos +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307677 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-11 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.144745580E09 +++$+++ |}-- +++$+++ |}--[[User:AYArktos|A Y Arktos]]\<sup>[[User_talk:AYArktos|talk]]</sup> 01:53, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
307678 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307677 +++$+++ 307677 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.144774860E09 +++$+++ Forwarded to [[User talk:Cactus.man]] with a wee note on progress on references to the cartoon books. .. +++$+++ :Forwarded to [[User talk:Cactus.man]] with a wee note on progress on references to the cartoon books. ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 10:01, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
307679 +++$+++ Cactus.man +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307677 +++$+++ 307678 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.144777380E09 +++$+++ I nominated it for DYK after a request on the talk page. The article's looking good Dave, the cover scans and extra commentary on the books fill it out nicely, great stuff. BTW, there's a signed 1st edition copy of ''Bud Neill's Magic!'' going for \xa3100 on [http:\/\/cgi.ebay.co.uk\/bud-neil-magic-glasgow-cartoonist-lobey-dosser-freepost_W0QQitemZ7020658588QQcategoryZ2232QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem eBay] if you're feeling mad enough ''':'''-) I'll pass on this occasion. --<font color=\"2B7A2B\"> +++$+++ ::I nominated it for DYK after a request on the talk page. The article's looking good Dave, the cover scans and extra commentary on the books fill it out nicely, great stuff. BTW, there's a signed 1st edition copy of ''Bud Neill's Magic!'' going for £100 on [http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/bud-neil-magic-glasgow-cartoonist-lobey-dosser-freepost_W0QQitemZ7020658588QQcategoryZ2232QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem eBay] if you're feeling mad enough ''':'''-) I'll pass on this occasion. --<font color="2B7A2B">[[User:Cactus.man|Cactus<b>.</b>man]]</font> <font size="4">[[User talk:Cactus.man|&#9997;]]</font> 10:43, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
307680 +++$+++ Jim62sch +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307677 +++$+++ 307679 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.144801140E09 +++$+++ That's pretty awesome!  I guess you let FM know that he was now semi-famous as a cartoon?   +++$+++ :::That's pretty awesome!  I guess you let FM know that he was now semi-famous as a cartoon?  [[User:Jim62sch|<font face="Times New Roman" color="FF2400">&#0149;Jim</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="F4C430">62</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="000000">sch&#0149;</font>]] 17:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

273200 +++$+++ Finnegans wake +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273200 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.165425060E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I wanted to first thank you for being courageous enough to police the Ignatieff article over the last months, to defend it against an abusive user. Unfortunately, Canuckster \/ Neutralizer and his sock puppets (67.71.*.* \/ 70.48.*.*) is back now, and already beginning to ruin the article (that had been formulated based on consensus) and making accusations against editors (CJCurrie and Strotha) on the Ignatieff talk page. -  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I wanted to first thank you for being courageous enough to police the Ignatieff article over the last months, to defend it against an abusive user. Unfortunately, Canuckster / Neutralizer and his sock puppets (67.71.*.* / 70.48.*.*) is back now, and already beginning to ruin the article (that had been formulated based on consensus) and making accusations against editors (CJCurrie and Strotha) on the Ignatieff talk page. - [[User:Finnegans wake|Finnegans wake]] 09:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
273201 +++$+++ Strothra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273200 +++$+++ 273200 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.165446960E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, could weigh in on the discussion at [[Talk:Michael Ignatieff]]?  I'm tired of battling this anon troll and would like a third opinion. -- +++$+++ :Hi Sarah, could weigh in on the discussion at [[Talk:Michael Ignatieff]]?  I'm tired of battling this anon troll and would like a third opinion. --[[User:Strothra|Strothra]] 15:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
273202 +++$+++ Strothra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273200 +++$+++ 273201 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.165456080E09 +++$+++ Would it be a good idea to protect the article? -- +++$+++ ::Would it be a good idea to protect the article? --[[User:Strothra|Strothra]] 17:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

11058 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11058 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-16 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.302996360E09 +++$+++ If we knew where \"33-\xe5rige skotten James Pettison Stewart som kaptein\" originated from in Scotland there could be a connection to be made! +++$+++ If we knew where "33-årige skotten James Pettison Stewart som kaptein" originated from in Scotland there could be a connection to be made![[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 16:26, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
11059 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11058 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-16 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.302999360E09 +++$+++ I did a quick google and it is clear that his origins are obscure. No certain date of birth, no info on his ancestry or his place of birth. On a semi-related note, could you look at [[HMS Salorman (1808)]] and see if there is anything you can add re her Danish service. I have what I could get from the Orlogsmuseet, but perhaps there is another tidbit or two that one might add. Regards, +++$+++ ::I did a quick google and it is clear that his origins are obscure. No certain date of birth, no info on his ancestry or his place of birth. On a semi-related note, could you look at [[HMS Salorman (1808)]] and see if there is anything you can add re her Danish service. I have what I could get from the Orlogsmuseet, but perhaps there is another tidbit or two that one might add. Regards,[[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 17:16, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
11060 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11058 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-16 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.303007400E09 +++$+++ S\xf8ormen - \"the sea worm\" - I will have a look see! +++$+++ :: Søormen - "the sea worm" - I will have a look see![[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 19:30, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
11061 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11058 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-16 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.303011840E09 +++$+++ \"Sea serpent\" sounds so much better than \"Sea worm\". :-) Thanks, and regards,  +++$+++ :::"Sea serpent" sounds so much better than "Sea worm". :-) Thanks, and regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 20:44, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

535347 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-10 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.160501880E09 +++$+++ With all due respect, Mets501. Your comment when closing the WP:RM was strictly unnecessary (\"It really doesn't matter: it's just a squigly line\"[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AOscar_Nunez&diff=80131073&oldid=79319424]). An administrator is not expected to take sides in that sense and\/or using demeaning language towards one of the opinions expressed. I apology in advance if I misinterpreted your words. The proper use of diacritics in an encyclopedia such as Wikipedia is important indeed ([[WP:CSB|systemic bias]] springs to mind). Aside a couple of border-line comments from Gene Nygaard addressed to the nominator [[User:DrBat]], there were no incidences of uncivility either. If anything, editors should be commended for taking the steps to discuss the matter instead engaging on pointless edit wars (e.g. see [[Pri\u0161tina]]). Regards,  +++$+++ With all due respect, Mets501. Your comment when closing the WP:RM was strictly unnecessary ("It really doesn't matter: it's just a squigly line"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AOscar_Nunez&diff=80131073&oldid=79319424]). An administrator is not expected to take sides in that sense and/or using demeaning language towards one of the opinions expressed. I apology in advance if I misinterpreted your words. The proper use of diacritics in an encyclopedia such as Wikipedia is important indeed ([[WP:CSB|systemic bias]] springs to mind). Aside a couple of border-line comments from Gene Nygaard addressed to the nominator [[User:DrBat]], there were no incidences of uncivility either. If anything, editors should be commended for taking the steps to discuss the matter instead engaging on pointless edit wars (e.g. see [[Priština]]). Regards, [[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''talk'''</font>]]</small></sup> 10:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
535348 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535347 +++$+++ 535347 +++$+++ 2006-10-10 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.160503080E09 +++$+++ Hi Asterion.  I'm sorry that you took my words that way.  I, if anyone, am someone who is quite concerned about diacritics.  That was the primary reason I set up [[User:MetsBot|MetsBot]], in fact: to fix diacritics (like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Golden_Baseball_League&diff=prev&oldid=70604350 this]).  I did not mean my comment to be demeaning towards either side, all I meant was that there is so much inconsistency with Nunez and Nu\xf1ez in the case of this actor that it was obvious that neither one was the wrong one, and way to much time had been spent arguing over it.  If I were to have my personal opinion, it would definitely be to add the \xf1, but being the closing administrator, I had to put my opinion aside and close the case.  You are right, though, my words were a bit too harsh, considering there were no personal attacks or edit wars involved, so I've changed them.  Thanks again. \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ :Hi Asterion.  I'm sorry that you took my words that way.  I, if anyone, am someone who is quite concerned about diacritics.  That was the primary reason I set up [[User:MetsBot|MetsBot]], in fact: to fix diacritics (like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Golden_Baseball_League&diff=prev&oldid=70604350 this]).  I did not mean my comment to be demeaning towards either side, all I meant was that there is so much inconsistency with Nunez and Nuñez in the case of this actor that it was obvious that neither one was the wrong one, and way to much time had been spent arguing over it.  If I were to have my personal opinion, it would definitely be to add the ñ, but being the closing administrator, I had to put my opinion aside and close the case.  You are right, though, my words were a bit too harsh, considering there were no personal attacks or edit wars involved, so I've changed them.  Thanks again. —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 10:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
535349 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535347 +++$+++ 535348 +++$+++ 2006-10-10 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.160503380E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much. I appreciate your work. Best wishes,  +++$+++ ::Thanks very much. I appreciate your work. Best wishes, [[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''talk'''</font>]]</small></sup> 11:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

273204 +++$+++ Wikiwoohoo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273204 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.165459080E09 +++$+++ Hi. Just to let you know that I have answered your concerns regarding your oppose vote at my RfA. Hope that helps. THank you for voting.  +++$+++ Hi. Just to let you know that I have answered your concerns regarding your oppose vote at my RfA. Hope that helps. THank you for voting. [[User:Wikiwoohoo|Wikiwoohoo]] 18:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
273205 +++$+++ Wikiwoohoo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273204 +++$+++ 273204 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.165461960E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know that I have replied to your comment.  +++$+++ :Just to let you know that I have replied to your comment. [[User:Wikiwoohoo|Wikiwoohoo]] 19:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
273206 +++$+++ Wikiwoohoo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273204 +++$+++ 273205 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.165467780E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome to your own opinions. Thank you for taking the time to vote on my RfA.  +++$+++ ::You are very welcome to your own opinions. Thank you for taking the time to vote on my RfA. [[User:Wikiwoohoo|Wikiwoohoo]] 21:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

11062 +++$+++ Diiscool +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-10 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.305015720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your compliments and tweaking on [[Spesutie Island]]. I added a reference to the ''London Gazette'' from the {{HMS|Highflyer|1813|6}} article. I had ''no clue'' such a wonderful resource was available nor that there is a template for citing it. I will be using it very soon when I finish the article on the [[Raid on Havre de Grace]]. I'll let you know when that one is finished and perhaps you could take a look at it too. Regards. \u2014 +++$+++ Thanks for your compliments and tweaking on [[Spesutie Island]]. I added a reference to the ''London Gazette'' from the {{HMS|Highflyer|1813|6}} article. I had ''no clue'' such a wonderful resource was available nor that there is a template for citing it. I will be using it very soon when I finish the article on the [[Raid on Havre de Grace]]. I'll let you know when that one is finished and perhaps you could take a look at it too. Regards. —[[User:Diiscool|Diiscool]] ([[User talk:Diiscool|talk]]) 01:22, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
11063 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11062 +++$+++ 11062 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.305018060E09 +++$+++ Isn't the ''London Gazette'' great? I have found that almost all subsequent accounts of actions originate in the letters published there. Sometimes later authors such as James and Marshall add info, but the core and the bulk is usually in the ''Gazette''.  Do let me know re the raid. I would be glad to look it over. Regards,  +++$+++ :Isn't the ''London Gazette'' great? I have found that almost all subsequent accounts of actions originate in the letters published there. Sometimes later authors such as James and Marshall add info, but the core and the bulk is usually in the ''Gazette''.  Do let me know re the raid. I would be glad to look it over. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 02:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

273207 +++$+++ TigranTheGreat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273207 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.165398840E09 +++$+++ Hi, Sarah. Is there a way to block user [[User:Ulvi I.]]? He is clearly a sockpuppet, he resurfaces every time there is a dispute with Azeri editors, starts reverting people, then miraculously vanishes. This only aggrevates the disputes. Thank you. -- +++$+++ Hi, Sarah. Is there a way to block user [[User:Ulvi I.]]? He is clearly a sockpuppet, he resurfaces every time there is a dispute with Azeri editors, starts reverting people, then miraculously vanishes. This only aggrevates the disputes. Thank you. --[[User:TigranTheGreat|TigranTheGreat]] 01:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
273208 +++$+++ Grandmaster +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273207 +++$+++ 273207 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.165416420E09 +++$+++ You should ask for a checkuser before making accusations. I can say the same about [[User:ROOB323|ROOB323]], who was not previously known as an editor of Armenia-Azerbaijan related articles and suddenly turned up to support Fadix.  +++$+++ : You should ask for a checkuser before making accusations. I can say the same about [[User:ROOB323|ROOB323]], who was not previously known as an editor of Armenia-Azerbaijan related articles and suddenly turned up to support Fadix. [[User:Grandmaster|Grandmaster]] 06:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
273209 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273207 +++$+++ 273208 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.165464360E09 +++$+++ Sarah, I also had a similar ecounter with GM and Ulvi. Ulvi suddenly appeared where ever GM needed help, and then when GM disappeared for awhile so did Ulvi. Suspicious, no? +++$+++ ::Sarah, I also had a similar ecounter with GM and Ulvi. Ulvi suddenly appeared where ever GM needed help, and then when GM disappeared for awhile so did Ulvi. Suspicious, no?[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 20:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
273210 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273207 +++$+++ 273209 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.165465620E09 +++$+++ I know and I [[User_talk:Ulvi_I.#Please_withdraw_from_this_dispute|asked]] Ulvi on his talk page to withdraw from the dispute between you and GM. I considered filing a request for checkuser when I discovered that his 13th edit was the dishonest certification of the [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/LIGerasimova|LIGerasimova RfC]]. Unfortunately, if he is a sockpuppet, the account isn't used regularly or frequently enough for them to still have the IP log to establish a pattern. And it's easy to get around checkuser once you're aware that it exists. I think he's probably a meatpuppet, rather than a sockpuppet, but either way, I do agree it is a very suspicious account. ''' +++$+++ :::I know and I [[User_talk:Ulvi_I.#Please_withdraw_from_this_dispute|asked]] Ulvi on his talk page to withdraw from the dispute between you and GM. I considered filing a request for checkuser when I discovered that his 13th edit was the dishonest certification of the [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/LIGerasimova|LIGerasimova RfC]]. Unfortunately, if he is a sockpuppet, the account isn't used regularly or frequently enough for them to still have the IP log to establish a pattern. And it's easy to get around checkuser once you're aware that it exists. I think he's probably a meatpuppet, rather than a sockpuppet, but either way, I do agree it is a very suspicious account. '''[[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]]''' 20:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

11064 +++$+++ Hantsheroes +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11064 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-24 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.306306440E09 +++$+++ Great edits on the Young Teazer site.  The professional editing on these sites inspires me to continue to contribute to them.  It's satisfying to see them polished. If you are interested, it would be great to have you review the [[Father Le Loutre's War]] site. -- +++$+++ Great edits on the Young Teazer site.  The professional editing on these sites inspires me to continue to contribute to them.  It's satisfying to see them polished. If you are interested, it would be great to have you review the [[Father Le Loutre's War]] site. --[[User:Hantsheroes|Hantsheroes]] ([[User talk:Hantsheroes|talk]]) 23:54, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
11065 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11064 +++$+++ 11064 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.306398240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the kind words. I have briefly looked at the Father...War article. It looks in better shape than the Young Teazer article and some of the ambiguities I noticed would require more specific knowledge than I have. Still, I will return to it on occasion to see what I can do. I too like to see articles improve with editing, additional info being added by different editors, and the like. In my own areas of specialization I am seeing cases where the Wikipedia article is more correct than many of the major sources as research turns up info that had been overlooked before. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks for the kind words. I have briefly looked at the Father...War article. It looks in better shape than the Young Teazer article and some of the ambiguities I noticed would require more specific knowledge than I have. Still, I will return to it on occasion to see what I can do. I too like to see articles improve with editing, additional info being added by different editors, and the like. In my own areas of specialization I am seeing cases where the Wikipedia article is more correct than many of the major sources as research turns up info that had been overlooked before. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 01:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

11067 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-11 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.307807520E09 +++$+++ Work in progress at [[User:Viking1808\/Peter Nicoly Skibsted]] contains the recent translation from Tops\xf8e and other accumulated notes.  It still needs a lot of polishing, plus references and links, but the information is there. Use the information if you wish. I will ask for comments later when I have edited in references.  I am also changing the translation of \"Premierlieutenant\" from First Lieutenant - which has another meaning in English - to senior lieutenant (Comments?) +++$+++ Work in progress at [[User:Viking1808/Peter Nicoly Skibsted]] contains the recent translation from Topsøe and other accumulated notes.  It still needs a lot of polishing, plus references and links, but the information is there. Use the information if you wish. I will ask for comments later when I have edited in references.  I am also changing the translation of "Premierlieutenant" from First Lieutenant - which has another meaning in English - to senior lieutenant (Comments?)[[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 08:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
11068 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11067 +++$+++ 11067 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.308172380E09 +++$+++ Hi Acad - I think I have taken the Skibsted article as far as I can.  Do you have any comments (when you return from holiday) before I send it public?   +++$+++ : Hi Acad - I think I have taken the Skibsted article as far as I can.  Do you have any comments (when you return from holiday) before I send it public?  [[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 14:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

535356 +++$+++ Ricardoramirezj +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-24 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.161729960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ricardoramirezj|Ricardoramirezj]] [[User Talk:Ricardoramirezj|✍]] 15:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
535357 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535356 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-08 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.162981980E09 +++$+++ Does that sound reasonable? -  +++$+++ :: Does that sound reasonable? - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 02:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

11069 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-24 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.308970980E09 +++$+++ I notice your new contribution to [[Battle of Copenhagen (1807)]] but this is another case of foreign ships' names becoming mangled before being reported in the London Gazette!! This has already been picked up by others at the Copenhagen discussion page, as you will quickly see. Thanks again.  +++$+++ I notice your new contribution to [[Battle of Copenhagen (1807)]] but this is another case of foreign ships' names becoming mangled before being reported in the London Gazette!! This has already been picked up by others at the Copenhagen discussion page, as you will quickly see. Thanks again. [[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 20:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
11070 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11069 +++$+++ 11069 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.309062180E09 +++$+++ I knew the Danish name and should have referenced it as well in the article. The problem is, the English records, and not just the London Gazette, carry her name as ''Fredrickscoarn'', so if you want to find her in the Naval database, Phillips, or the ''Naval Chronicle'', you need the english name, not the Danish. Regards,  +++$+++ :I knew the Danish name and should have referenced it as well in the article. The problem is, the English records, and not just the London Gazette, carry her name as ''Fredrickscoarn'', so if you want to find her in the Naval database, Phillips, or the ''Naval Chronicle'', you need the english name, not the Danish. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 21:23, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

11071 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11071 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.309316220E09 +++$+++ Hi Acad - the above has led me to two native Danish speakers on the English wiki - [[User:Necesary Evil|Necesary Evil]] and Saddhiyama--[[User:Saddhiyama|Saddhiyama]] - the first is \" very active on naval articles.\" and has just translated HMS Falcon (1802) for Danish Wiki[http:\/\/da.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/HMS_Falcon_(1802) HMS Falcon (1802)].  Thoughts?  +++$+++ Hi Acad - the above has led me to two native Danish speakers on the English wiki - [[User:Necesary Evil|Necesary Evil]] and Saddhiyama--[[User:Saddhiyama|Saddhiyama]] - the first is " very active on naval articles." and has just translated HMS Falcon (1802) for Danish Wiki[http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Falcon_(1802) HMS Falcon (1802)].  Thoughts? [[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 19:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
11072 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11071 +++$+++ 11071 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.309473060E09 +++$+++ You might contact them and encourage them to do articles in the English wikipedia on the Danish vessels involved in the 1801-1814 war. For instance, if either was to do an article on the ''Fredrickscoarn'' I could then add the English history. Same with ''Fredericksteen''. Regards,  +++$+++ :You might contact them and encourage them to do articles in the English wikipedia on the Danish vessels involved in the 1801-1814 war. For instance, if either was to do an article on the ''Fredrickscoarn'' I could then add the English history. Same with ''Fredericksteen''. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 15:31, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
11073 +++$+++ Viking1808 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11071 +++$+++ 11072 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.309561020E09 +++$+++ Will do! Can you produce a short list for him to choose from, if he is interested!  Meanwhile N Evil is working on a Grinder translation [http:\/\/da.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bruger:Viking1808\/HMS_Grinder_(1802) here.](Never mind the 1802 in the title - that is a carry over from HMS Falcon and will get swept up before publication.) +++$+++ :: Will do! Can you produce a short list for him to choose from, if he is interested!  Meanwhile N Evil is working on a Grinder translation [http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruger:Viking1808/HMS_Grinder_(1802) here.](Never mind the 1802 in the title - that is a carry over from HMS Falcon and will get swept up before publication.)[[User:Viking1808|Viking1808]] ([[User talk:Viking1808|talk]]) 15:57, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
11074 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11071 +++$+++ 11071 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.309565280E09 +++$+++ For a start: HDMS ''Prins Christian Frederik'', ''Frederiksv\xe6rn'' (''Fredrickscoarn''), and ''Fredericksteen'' (''Frederickstein''). Regards,  +++$+++ :For a start: HDMS ''Prins Christian Frederik'', ''Frederiksværn'' (''Fredrickscoarn''), and ''Fredericksteen'' (''Frederickstein''). Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 17:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

535360 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-06 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.162801080E09 +++$+++ I disagree.  First off, ISO is not designating a name, it is letting you know that ''that entity'' has an ISO code of FK (it has no authority to designate a name).  Secondly, ISO or not, it really is not referred to as such in English.  We do not have to disambiguate if it's not going to be used (and it really won't be\u2014no one will ever look up the Falkland Islands as Malvinas).  I note you changed it from I to M, though, which is at least consistent with the ISO use (not ''designation'', because, as I said, the ISO does not designate country names). <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ I disagree.  First off, ISO is not designating a name, it is letting you know that ''that entity'' has an ISO code of FK (it has no authority to designate a name).  Secondly, ISO or not, it really is not referred to as such in English.  We do not have to disambiguate if it's not going to be used (and it really won't be—no one will ever look up the Falkland Islands as Malvinas).  I note you changed it from I to M, though, which is at least consistent with the ISO use (not ''designation'', because, as I said, the ISO does not designate country names). <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="blue">OzLawyer</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 00:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
535361 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535360 +++$+++ 535360 +++$+++ 2006-11-06 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.162801380E09 +++$+++ Apologies, apparently it does think it can designate names--not that that makes them official.  Countries decide their own names.  If the UK does not call them Malvinas, and nobody is going to look them up as Malvinas, then there is still no reason to disambiguate. <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ :Apologies, apparently it does think it can designate names--not that that makes them official.  Countries decide their own names.  If the UK does not call them Malvinas, and nobody is going to look them up as Malvinas, then there is still no reason to disambiguate. <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="blue">OzLawyer</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 00:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
535362 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535360 +++$+++ 535361 +++$+++ 2006-11-06 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.162802280E09 +++$+++ Considering that Malvinas already redirect to that article, I think that having the disambiguation would be unnecessary. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Considering that Malvinas already redirect to that article, I think that having the disambiguation would be unnecessary. Cheers, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 00:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

569824 +++$+++ Theoldanarchist +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569824 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-25 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.177502340E09 +++$+++ I agree that this guy [[User:Mtm8186|Mtm8186]] deserved a block, but how long is a \"period of Kevin Joe\"?  --- +++$+++ I agree that this guy [[User:Mtm8186|Mtm8186]] deserved a block, but how long is a "period of Kevin Joe"?  ---[[User:Theoldanarchist|Charles]] 04:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
569825 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569824 +++$+++ 569824 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.177502460E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mtm8186&diff=prev&oldid=125735027 I changed that slip to 24 hours immediately]; you'll need to refresh the page.  Regards,  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mtm8186&diff=prev&oldid=125735027 I changed that slip to 24 hours immediately]; you'll need to refresh the page.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 05:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
569826 +++$+++ Theoldanarchist +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569824 +++$+++ 569825 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.177502940E09 +++$+++ I see it.  I just thought I'd give you a hard time.  Cheers! --- +++$+++ ::I see it.  I just thought I'd give you a hard time.  Cheers! ---[[User:Theoldanarchist|Charles]] 05:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

273218 +++$+++ Grandmaster +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-30 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.164902160E09 +++$+++ The persons that he removed perfectly comply with this description. So what in your opinion should we do now? Should we let Khosrow to have it his way or is there any other way to resolve the issue? Thanks in advance for your assistance. Regards,  +++$+++ The persons that he removed perfectly comply with this description. So what in your opinion should we do now? Should we let Khosrow to have it his way or is there any other way to resolve the issue? Thanks in advance for your assistance. Regards, [[User:Grandmaster|Grandmaster]] 07:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
273219 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273218 +++$+++ 273218 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.165372980E09 +++$+++ The solution is quite simple. Move everyone who is not of the Azerbaijani nationality to their respective pages. Simple as that. Then we wont have such a misinformative and controversial article. There is already a debate going on in the List of Turks article as to why Atila the Hun and the President of the R. of Azerbaijan are in the list, along with others. The very same issue that I have been sayin is avoidable if all the List of .... articles are consistant. +++$+++ :The solution is quite simple. Move everyone who is not of the Azerbaijani nationality to their respective pages. Simple as that. Then we wont have such a misinformative and controversial article. There is already a debate going on in the List of Turks article as to why Atila the Hun and the President of the R. of Azerbaijan are in the list, along with others. The very same issue that I have been sayin is avoidable if all the List of .... articles are consistant.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 18:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
273220 +++$+++ Grandmaster +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273218 +++$+++ 273219 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 06:54:00 +++$+++ 1.165416840E09 +++$+++ Once again, Khosrow, it's not an ethnic list and the article says so. Thanks for your response, Sarah. I don\u2019t mind posting on the talk of the article, but I think I said everything that could have been said here: [[User_talk:Sarah_Ewart\/KII-GM2]] It\u2019s been quite a prolonged discussion that led to nothing.  +++$+++ :: Once again, Khosrow, it's not an ethnic list and the article says so. Thanks for your response, Sarah. I don’t mind posting on the talk of the article, but I think I said everything that could have been said here: [[User_talk:Sarah_Ewart/KII-GM2]] It’s been quite a prolonged discussion that led to nothing. [[User:Grandmaster|Grandmaster]] 06:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
273221 +++$+++ Khosrow II +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273218 +++$+++ 273220 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.165464480E09 +++$+++ It kept going in circles because you made it so. You never address the main issues, infact, you avoid them. For example, I have asked you for over a month to express your problems with a certain section, yet instead of doing so you start another revert war all over again. +++$+++ :::It kept going in circles because you made it so. You never address the main issues, infact, you avoid them. For example, I have asked you for over a month to express your problems with a certain section, yet instead of doing so you start another revert war all over again.[[User:Khosrow II|Khosrow II]] 20:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

11075 +++$+++ Swliv +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11075 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-01 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.309582020E09 +++$+++ I'll check back to see\/and see if there's more I could\/ought to do. Thanks for now.  +++$+++ I'll check back to see/and see if there's more I could/ought to do. Thanks for now. [[User:Swliv|Swliv]] ([[User talk:Swliv|talk]]) 21:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
11076 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11075 +++$+++ 11075 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.309589280E09 +++$+++ I saw your earlier reversion. Unfortunately, I don't know the procedure for warning off vandals either. One problem with just an IP address is that it may be a shared computer, for instance, in an internet cafe, in which case warnings are of limited utility. My sense is that when vandals get reverted quickly, they start to get bored. We just have to remain vigilant. Regards,  +++$+++ :I saw your earlier reversion. Unfortunately, I don't know the procedure for warning off vandals either. One problem with just an IP address is that it may be a shared computer, for instance, in an internet cafe, in which case warnings are of limited utility. My sense is that when vandals get reverted quickly, they start to get bored. We just have to remain vigilant. Regards, [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 23:48, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
11077 +++$+++ Swliv +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11075 +++$+++ 11076 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.309917600E09 +++$+++ With another round [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bank_of_Hawaii&diff=next&oldid=437445072 from a new or restyled editor, and counterpoint, here], and your answer above, I'm going to do a brief link over here from [[Talk:Bank of Hawaii#Vandal(s)?]], maybe someone can help from there. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::With another round [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bank_of_Hawaii&diff=next&oldid=437445072 from a new or restyled editor, and counterpoint, here], and your answer above, I'm going to do a brief link over here from [[Talk:Bank of Hawaii#Vandal(s)?]], maybe someone can help from there. Thanks. [[User:Swliv|Swliv]] ([[User talk:Swliv|talk]]) 19:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
11078 +++$+++ Swliv +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11075 +++$+++ 11077 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.310526060E09 +++$+++ There's some more on the BoH talk page, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:SQGibbon#Bank_of_Hawaii_reversion and here], and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Acalamari#Bank_of_Hawaii.2FBananaObama_block and here]. A little confusion on IP#s at the moment, but I'll straighten that out. On. FYI. Cheers.  +++$+++ :::There's some more on the BoH talk page, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SQGibbon#Bank_of_Hawaii_reversion and here], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Acalamari#Bank_of_Hawaii.2FBananaObama_block and here]. A little confusion on IP#s at the moment, but I'll straighten that out. On. FYI. Cheers. [[User:Swliv|Swliv]] ([[User talk:Swliv|talk]]) 20:01, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

273222 +++$+++ Grandmaster +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-08 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.165609500E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. I raised the issue once again on the talk of the [[List of Azerbaijanis]] as discussed. I hope it will help resolve the dispute. Also, could you please have a look at the actions of the user [[User:Arash the Bowman|Arash the Bowman]]. He appears to be a meatpuppet. Please check up his contribs, his contributions are nothing but rvs of the articles to the versions, reflecting a certain POV. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Arash_the_Bowman] Regards,  +++$+++ Hi Sarah. I raised the issue once again on the talk of the [[List of Azerbaijanis]] as discussed. I hope it will help resolve the dispute. Also, could you please have a look at the actions of the user [[User:Arash the Bowman|Arash the Bowman]]. He appears to be a meatpuppet. Please check up his contribs, his contributions are nothing but rvs of the articles to the versions, reflecting a certain POV. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Arash_the_Bowman] Regards, [[User:Grandmaster|Grandmaster]] 12:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
273223 +++$+++ Grandmaster +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273222 +++$+++ 273222 +++$+++ 2006-12-09 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.165678140E09 +++$+++ Right now I tend to think that he\u2019s a meatpuppet, but quite possible that he\u2019s a sock. We had an incident during the discussion on Iranian people article, which eventually became an FA, when one of the Iranian users voted 3 times under different IPs (checkuser established the fact). And at the same time another user was mobilizing people to vote via an Internet forum. So I suspect that similar activity continues. Some people try to use numerical superiority to have some regional articles reflect a certain position. I don\u2019t want to make any personal accusations without having enough proof, but I can see that Arash mostly rvs the articles to the version of Khosrow. I don\u2019t know if it is just a coincidence or not, but it looks very suspicious.  +++$+++ : Right now I tend to think that he’s a meatpuppet, but quite possible that he’s a sock. We had an incident during the discussion on Iranian people article, which eventually became an FA, when one of the Iranian users voted 3 times under different IPs (checkuser established the fact). And at the same time another user was mobilizing people to vote via an Internet forum. So I suspect that similar activity continues. Some people try to use numerical superiority to have some regional articles reflect a certain position. I don’t want to make any personal accusations without having enough proof, but I can see that Arash mostly rvs the articles to the version of Khosrow. I don’t know if it is just a coincidence or not, but it looks very suspicious. [[User:Grandmaster|Grandmaster]] 07:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

273224 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-08 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.165636440E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your concern with my RfA. For what it's worth, my 3RR violation was accidental; I was dealing with a user who was persistently reverting to the same text, and had been blocked before. I lost count over the course of a day and did a fourth reversion in 23:45, instead of proposing an alternate text, as I had intended, or going to AN3 myself.  +++$+++ Thank you for your concern with my RfA. For what it's worth, my 3RR violation was accidental; I was dealing with a user who was persistently reverting to the same text, and had been blocked before. I lost count over the course of a day and did a fourth reversion in 23:45, instead of proposing an alternate text, as I had intended, or going to AN3 myself. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 19:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
273225 +++$+++ Finnegans wake +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273224 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-09 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.165695420E09 +++$+++ I second that award. Thanks Sarah! -  +++$+++ ::: I second that award. Thanks Sarah! - [[User:Finnegans wake|Finnegans wake]] 12:17, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

11082 +++$+++ Herostratus +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.312005420E09 +++$+++ Just a note to say that I thought [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Revolt_of_the_Lash&curid=21648655&diff=442069500&oldid=438964573 this] was a nice edit, tightening up and improving the wording. Thanks.  +++$+++ Just a note to say that I thought [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Revolt_of_the_Lash&curid=21648655&diff=442069500&oldid=438964573 this] was a nice edit, tightening up and improving the wording. Thanks. [[User:Herostratus|Herostratus]] ([[User talk:Herostratus|talk]]) 22:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
11083 +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ Acad Ronin +++$+++ 11082 +++$+++ 11082 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.312009500E09 +++$+++ Thanks. The article clearly was written by a non-native English speaker. The whole article needs a little more polishing and I will touch it up periodically. There were some sentences I couldn't really touch because I wasn't sure what was meant. In any case, I want to encourage non-Anglos to write for wikipedia so that it gets coverage of topics that otherwise wouldn't hit the radar, and sometimes viewpoints that aren't Anglo. Again, thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. The article clearly was written by a non-native English speaker. The whole article needs a little more polishing and I will touch it up periodically. There were some sentences I couldn't really touch because I wasn't sure what was meant. In any case, I want to encourage non-Anglos to write for wikipedia so that it gets coverage of topics that otherwise wouldn't hit the radar, and sometimes viewpoints that aren't Anglo. Again, thanks. [[User:Acad Ronin|Acad Ronin]] ([[User talk:Acad Ronin#top|talk]]) 00:05, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

535371 +++$+++ Burgas00 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-17 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.163823660E09 +++$+++ Hola Asterion, que quieres decir con the new for references? Si es the need for references, ya estaban en el articulo que fue deleted pero se perdieron... Habia 4 o 5 references. Si quieres las pongo...Thanks for your opinion! -- +++$+++ Hola Asterion, que quieres decir con the new for references? Si es the need for references, ya estaban en el articulo que fue deleted pero se perdieron... Habia 4 o 5 references. Si quieres las pongo...Thanks for your opinion! --[[User:Burgas00|Burgas00]] 20:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
535372 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535371 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.163823840E09 +++$+++ Tengo la cabeza echa un lio. Lo acabo de arreglar. La verdad es que no se que hago en wikipedia ahora mismo. Tengo que estar en Heathrow a las 5 de la ma\xf1ana...  +++$+++ ::Tengo la cabeza echa un lio. Lo acabo de arreglar. La verdad es que no se que hago en wikipedia ahora mismo. Tengo que estar en Heathrow a las 5 de la mañana... [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 20:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

11085 +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ 11085 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-30 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.309441320E09 +++$+++ Also, if you look at this:[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Boxer_Rebellion&diff=435915687&oldid=435253862], which was posted on 24 June 2011, yet no editor care to post any response. It is wrong to label me as a anti-Manchu editors, if I was one, I would not bother to do all these translation of the Imperial Decrees on Wikisource:[http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/User:Arilang1234], beside, the creation of  [[Wuwei Troop]] should be seen as as putting a positive light on the Manchu Empire.<i><b><small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Also, if you look at this:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Boxer_Rebellion&diff=435915687&oldid=435253862], which was posted on 24 June 2011, yet no editor care to post any response. It is wrong to label me as a anti-Manchu editors, if I was one, I would not bother to do all these translation of the Imperial Decrees on Wikisource:[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/User:Arilang1234], beside, the creation of  [[Wuwei Troop]] should be seen as as putting a positive light on the Manchu Empire.<i><b><small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Arilang1234|<font style="color:white;background:#fe0000;"> Arilang  </font>]]</span></small><font color="blue"> <sup>[[User talk:Arilang1234|''talk'']]</sup></font></b></i> 06:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
11086 +++$+++ Quigley +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ 11085 +++$+++ 11085 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.309442700E09 +++$+++ Your {{diff|Talk:Boxer Rebellion|435915687|435253862|description}} of the authors whose opinions you wanted included was deceptively bland and flattering, not once mentioning their strong anti-Boxer viewpoint. That ''might'' have been of interest to the users watching that page, who you gave less than a week to review four authors (who write exclusively in the Chinese language) for whom you {{oldid|Hou Yijie|435410747|gave}} {{oldid|Tong Tekong|435550133|almost}} {{oldid|Wang Shuzhen|435731770|no}} {{oldid|Jin Manluo|435742954|clues}} as to their slant on their English Wikipedia articles. That talk page notice was ''at best'' irresponsible. By the way, your insistence on \"Manchu Empire\" even in this discussion, and refusal to call the Qing \"Chinese\", does not show abandonment of the [[WP:FRINGE|fringe theory]] that the Qing was not China. Not that you can't maintain this as a personal belief, but it should not spill onto article space.  +++$+++ :Your {{diff|Talk:Boxer Rebellion|435915687|435253862|description}} of the authors whose opinions you wanted included was deceptively bland and flattering, not once mentioning their strong anti-Boxer viewpoint. That ''might'' have been of interest to the users watching that page, who you gave less than a week to review four authors (who write exclusively in the Chinese language) for whom you {{oldid|Hou Yijie|435410747|gave}} {{oldid|Tong Tekong|435550133|almost}} {{oldid|Wang Shuzhen|435731770|no}} {{oldid|Jin Manluo|435742954|clues}} as to their slant on their English Wikipedia articles. That talk page notice was ''at best'' irresponsible. By the way, your insistence on "Manchu Empire" even in this discussion, and refusal to call the Qing "Chinese", does not show abandonment of the [[WP:FRINGE|fringe theory]] that the Qing was not China. Not that you can't maintain this as a personal belief, but it should not spill onto article space. [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 07:05, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
11087 +++$+++ Ohconfucius +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ 11085 +++$+++ 11086 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.309458300E09 +++$+++ I am unsure how it is [[WP:FRINGE|fringe theory]] to say that that the Qing was not China. I don't believe there is any doubt that the China is Han; Qing were Manchu who occupied China and thus de facto became imperial rulers of China. You could only say Qing was China by applying the Louisian maxim \"''L'\xe9tat, c'est moi''\".  -- +++$+++ ::I am unsure how it is [[WP:FRINGE|fringe theory]] to say that that the Qing was not China. I don't believe there is any doubt that the China is Han; Qing were Manchu who occupied China and thus de facto became imperial rulers of China. You could only say Qing was China by applying the Louisian maxim "''L'état, c'est moi''".  --[[User:Ohconfucius|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 11:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
11088 +++$+++ Quigley +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ 11085 +++$+++ 11087 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.309484340E09 +++$+++ To clarify, the fringe theory is that China ceased to exist, and so every reference to \"China\" in the Qing's time period should be excised for \"Qing\", \"Manchu\", or some variant thereof. Characterized by an {{diff|Talk:Joseon Dynasty|434310369|434244462|obsession}} with the ethnicity of the ruling family, it is most clearly expressed in disruptive edits like {{diff|Jiandao|prev|436421939|this}}, to which {{diff|Boxer Rebellion|436496932|436081149|Arilang's}} {{diff|Boxer Rebellion|436497120|436496932|creeping}} {{diff|Boxer Rebellion|436634908|436633147|replacement}} of \"Chinese\" with \"Imperial\" comes dangerously close.  +++$+++ :::To clarify, the fringe theory is that China ceased to exist, and so every reference to "China" in the Qing's time period should be excised for "Qing", "Manchu", or some variant thereof. Characterized by an {{diff|Talk:Joseon Dynasty|434310369|434244462|obsession}} with the ethnicity of the ruling family, it is most clearly expressed in disruptive edits like {{diff|Jiandao|prev|436421939|this}}, to which {{diff|Boxer Rebellion|436496932|436081149|Arilang's}} {{diff|Boxer Rebellion|436497120|436496932|creeping}} {{diff|Boxer Rebellion|436634908|436633147|replacement}} of "Chinese" with "Imperial" comes dangerously close. [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 18:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
11089 +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ 11085 +++$+++ 11086 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.309503780E09 +++$+++ If user Quigley is so passionate about Chinese Dynasty, he should begin working on [[Qing Dynasty]] with his POV, instead of spamming my talkpage with irrelevant and off topic diff like {{diff|Talk:Joseon Dynasty|434310369|434244462|obsession}} and {{diff|Jiandao|prev|436421939|this}}, both are Korean topics, and of no interest to me, whatsoever.<i><b><small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::If user Quigley is so passionate about Chinese Dynasty, he should begin working on [[Qing Dynasty]] with his POV, instead of spamming my talkpage with irrelevant and off topic diff like {{diff|Talk:Joseon Dynasty|434310369|434244462|obsession}} and {{diff|Jiandao|prev|436421939|this}}, both are Korean topics, and of no interest to me, whatsoever.<i><b><small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Arilang1234|<font style="color:white;background:#fe0000;"> Arilang  </font>]]</span></small><font color="blue"> <sup>[[User talk:Arilang1234|''talk'']]</sup></font></b></i> 00:03, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

395064 +++$+++ Mlpearc +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395064 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-04 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.270423680E09 +++$+++ Hi Maurreen, We had an edit conflict, you left me a message at my talk while I was working on my auto- (*&$#%%#^) Archive (Sorry for the language.). Anyway could you please re-post the message. I know I can find it in History, but I find it's a good habit to document for the future, Thanks (Do you know any good plumbers... I mean Archivist ?) ''' +++$+++ Hi Maurreen, We had an edit conflict, you left me a message at my talk while I was working on my auto- (*&$#%%#^) Archive (Sorry for the language.). Anyway could you please re-post the message. I know I can find it in History, but I find it's a good habit to document for the future, Thanks (Do you know any good plumbers... I mean Archivist ?) '''[[User:Mlpearc|<span style='font-family:;color:#CFB53B'>Mlpearc</span>]] [[User_talk:Mlpearc|<span style='font-family:;COLOR:#848482'><small>MESSAGE</small></span>]]''' 16:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
395065 +++$+++ Mlpearc +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395064 +++$+++ 395064 +++$+++ 2010-04-05 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.270470780E09 +++$+++ Yes the \"source\" issue was answered by SV. The Huggle thing is that I use it sometimes and if a page that Huggle brings up because it thinks it's vandal or nonsence and I choose to say \"yes revert it\", if the editor that wrote the \"vandal\" is the author, Huggle will ask if I want to tag it for deletion also. So along those lines it would be another good tool to find pages that need to be tagged. Thanks for your message and time. Happy editing and see ya around ! !   ''' +++$+++ :Yes the "source" issue was answered by SV. The Huggle thing is that I use it sometimes and if a page that Huggle brings up because it thinks it's vandal or nonsence and I choose to say "yes revert it", if the editor that wrote the "vandal" is the author, Huggle will ask if I want to tag it for deletion also. So along those lines it would be another good tool to find pages that need to be tagged. Thanks for your message and time. Happy editing and see ya around ! !   '''[[User:Mlpearc|<span style='font-family:;color:#CFB53B'>Mlpearc</span>]] [[User_talk:Mlpearc|<span style='font-family:;COLOR:#848482'><small>MESSAGE</small></span>]]''' 05:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

11090 +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ 11090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-30 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.309444140E09 +++$+++ Also, if you read the lead section of [[Qing Dynasty]] carefully, the official name of the Manchu Empire is Daicing Gurun(Manchu name), or \u5927\u6e05\u570b, D\xe0 Q\u012bng Gu\xf3, or \u5927\u6e05\u5e1d\u570b D\xe0 Q\u012bng D\xec Gu\xf3, without any hint of anything  \"Chinese \" in it. Also, do you have source showing that the [[ Aisin Gioro ]] clan, and the [[Genghis Khan ]] clan, were \"Chinese\" ?<i><b><small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Also, if you read the lead section of [[Qing Dynasty]] carefully, the official name of the Manchu Empire is Daicing Gurun(Manchu name), or 大清國, Dà Qīng Guó, or 大清帝國 Dà Qīng Dì Guó, without any hint of anything  "Chinese " in it. Also, do you have source showing that the [[ Aisin Gioro ]] clan, and the [[Genghis Khan ]] clan, were "Chinese" ?<i><b><small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Arilang1234|<font style="color:white;background:#fe0000;"> Arilang  </font>]]</span></small><font color="blue"> <sup>[[User talk:Arilang1234|''talk'']]</sup></font></b></i> 07:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
11091 +++$+++ Quigley +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ 11090 +++$+++ 11090 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.309446720E09 +++$+++ I'm not interested in arguing the intricacies of Chinese dynastic succession. It's common knowledge that China did not disappear from the map in the years 1644\u20131912, despite the claims of some fanatical nationalists. And I told you already that my interest is not in whether or not the Boxers were {{diff|Boxer Rebellion|436996501|436996281|\"animalistic\" \"gangs of bandits\"}}. It's in your pattern of POV editing, which users [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/IncidentArchive663#Arilang1234|regularly]] [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/IncidentArchive698#Dungane and Arilang1234|complain]] [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/IncidentArchive667#Arilang1234|about]], spanning multiple topics; your recent foray into Boxer history {{diff|User talk:\u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0393\u0391\u039d\u0395|prev|435279529|not exempted}}. I'm starting to hear [[User:\u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0393\u0391\u039d\u0395\/Report ANI|those promises]] of change you made (including {{diff|Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard|prev|430208892|your latest}} about \"enforcing neutrality on all the articles\") ring hollow. A step of good faith that you could take right now would be to revert the edits you made on the [[Boxer Rebellion]] article and bring them to the talk page for review. If you want to continue cultivating conflict, then that's your choice.  +++$+++ :I'm not interested in arguing the intricacies of Chinese dynastic succession. It's common knowledge that China did not disappear from the map in the years 1644–1912, despite the claims of some fanatical nationalists. And I told you already that my interest is not in whether or not the Boxers were {{diff|Boxer Rebellion|436996501|436996281|"animalistic" "gangs of bandits"}}. It's in your pattern of POV editing, which users [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive663#Arilang1234|regularly]] [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive698#Dungane and Arilang1234|complain]] [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive667#Arilang1234|about]], spanning multiple topics; your recent foray into Boxer history {{diff|User talk:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ|prev|435279529|not exempted}}. I'm starting to hear [[User:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ/Report ANI|those promises]] of change you made (including {{diff|Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard|prev|430208892|your latest}} about "enforcing neutrality on all the articles") ring hollow. A step of good faith that you could take right now would be to revert the edits you made on the [[Boxer Rebellion]] article and bring them to the talk page for review. If you want to continue cultivating conflict, then that's your choice. [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 08:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
11092 +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ 11090 +++$+++ 11090 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.309447380E09 +++$+++ User Quigley, the above quotation is what I see as Neutrality at Wikipedia, and, to revert my edits, you have to show me that [[Tong Tekong]] viewpoints are not significant  mainstream viewpoints.<i><b><small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :User Quigley, the above quotation is what I see as Neutrality at Wikipedia, and, to revert my edits, you have to show me that [[Tong Tekong]] viewpoints are not significant  mainstream viewpoints.<i><b><small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Arilang1234|<font style="color:white;background:#fe0000;"> Arilang  </font>]]</span></small><font color="blue"> <sup>[[User talk:Arilang1234|''talk'']]</sup></font></b></i> 08:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

11093 +++$+++ Quigley +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ 11093 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-02 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.309600680E09 +++$+++ There is a discussion concerning you at the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#User:Arilang1234 and Boxer Rebellion|dispute resolution noticeboard]].  +++$+++ There is a discussion concerning you at the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#User:Arilang1234 and Boxer Rebellion|dispute resolution noticeboard]]. [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 02:58, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
11094 +++$+++ Nick-D +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ 11093 +++$+++ 11093 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.309686900E09 +++$+++ On the basis of the evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#User:Arilang1234 and Boxer Rebellion]] it is clear that you have engaged in disruptive editing and POV pushing while making personal attacks on other editors over the [[Boxer Rebellion]] article and related articles. This problem, and other problems with your conduct, have been going on for a long time (as demonstrated by the multiple reports raised at [[WP:ANI]] and [[WP:AN]]: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Search?search=Arilang1234+&prefix=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27+noticeboard&fulltext=Search+all+administrators%27+noticeboards+and+archives&fulltext=Search]) and the comments in your talk page archives), and previous warnings do not seem to have had any effect.  +++$+++ :On the basis of the evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#User:Arilang1234 and Boxer Rebellion]] it is clear that you have engaged in disruptive editing and POV pushing while making personal attacks on other editors over the [[Boxer Rebellion]] article and related articles. This problem, and other problems with your conduct, have been going on for a long time (as demonstrated by the multiple reports raised at [[WP:ANI]] and [[WP:AN]]: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Arilang1234+&prefix=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27+noticeboard&fulltext=Search+all+administrators%27+noticeboards+and+archives&fulltext=Search]) and the comments in your talk page archives), and previous warnings do not seem to have had any effect. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 02:55, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
11095 +++$+++ Metal.lunchbox +++$+++ Arilang1234 +++$+++ 11093 +++$+++ 11093 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.309830180E09 +++$+++ [[commons:File:1927 Chiang Soong wedding photo1.jpg]] is way better in its original form. Even though its a little dark it has way more detail and contrast. The newest version is blurry and washed-out by comparison. Please consider reverting it.  +++$+++ * [[commons:File:1927 Chiang Soong wedding photo1.jpg]] is way better in its original form. Even though its a little dark it has way more detail and contrast. The newest version is blurry and washed-out by comparison. Please consider reverting it. [[User:Metal.lunchbox|Metal.lunchbox]] ([[User talk:Metal.lunchbox|talk]]) 18:43, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

273242 +++$+++ Dv82matt +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-14 06:16:00 +++$+++ 1.166105760E09 +++$+++ Hi, just curious why you deleted this article. It was on the articles for creation page, and I think it's now notable enough for inclusion. \u2014 +++$+++ Hi, just curious why you deleted this article. It was on the articles for creation page, and I think it's now notable enough for inclusion. —[[User talk:Dv82matt|dv82matt]] 06:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
273243 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273242 +++$+++ 273242 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.166106060E09 +++$+++ There was no assertion of importance. ''' +++$+++ :There was no assertion of importance. '''[[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]]''' 06:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
273244 +++$+++ Dv82matt +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273242 +++$+++ 273243 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166106480E09 +++$+++ Okay thanks. But doesn't the assertion that they are creating the first \"meaning based\" search engine amount to an assertion of importance? \u2014 +++$+++ ::Okay thanks. But doesn't the assertion that they are creating the first "meaning based" search engine amount to an assertion of importance? —[[User talk:Dv82matt|dv82matt]] 06:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
273245 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273242 +++$+++ 273244 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.166106720E09 +++$+++ I don't think so and it didn't say that anyway; it said that's what they ''claim'' they are doing, which is very different. There's no prejudice against another article if you think you can make a stronger case for notability. ''' +++$+++ :::I don't think so and it didn't say that anyway; it said that's what they ''claim'' they are doing, which is very different. There's no prejudice against another article if you think you can make a stronger case for notability. '''[[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]]''' 06:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
273246 +++$+++ Dv82matt +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273242 +++$+++ 273245 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 06:48:00 +++$+++ 1.166107680E09 +++$+++ I may have misunderstood what you meant by 'assertion of importance'. Would mentions by third parties be more useful in establishing importance? I probably won't re-create the article unless I am reasonably sure that it will meet the standards of Wikipedia. Thanks again for your help. \u2014 +++$+++ ::::I may have misunderstood what you meant by 'assertion of importance'. Would mentions by third parties be more useful in establishing importance? I probably won't re-create the article unless I am reasonably sure that it will meet the standards of Wikipedia. Thanks again for your help. —[[User talk:Dv82matt|dv82matt]] 06:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
273247 +++$+++ Dv82matt +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273242 +++$+++ 273246 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 07:37:00 +++$+++ 1.166110620E09 +++$+++ Yes, it is currently in beta but it is available to the general public. I'm not sure that it doesn't meet [[WP:CORP]] but I agree that it's not a slam dunk. I just checked it's Alexa ranking, which is 25,482 so nothing too hopeful there, but Google returns 466,000 results. Its also been mentioned on several high profile blogs and even in the mainstream media. I will take your advice and wait till it's out of beta before recreating it. Cheers. \u2014 +++$+++ :::::Yes, it is currently in beta but it is available to the general public. I'm not sure that it doesn't meet [[WP:CORP]] but I agree that it's not a slam dunk. I just checked it's Alexa ranking, which is 25,482 so nothing too hopeful there, but Google returns 466,000 results. Its also been mentioned on several high profile blogs and even in the mainstream media. I will take your advice and wait till it's out of beta before recreating it. Cheers. —[[User talk:Dv82matt|dv82matt]] 07:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

11099 +++$+++ MiataMike +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11099 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-13 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.273738020E09 +++$+++ I thought putting Next and Previous season on each season page was completely stupid, since anyone that knows how to count would realize that the number that comes after 5 is 6 and the number prior is 4. However, I suppose it makes sense for convenient linking to each season page.  +++$+++ I thought putting Next and Previous season on each season page was completely stupid, since anyone that knows how to count would realize that the number that comes after 5 is 6 and the number prior is 4. However, I suppose it makes sense for convenient linking to each season page. [[User:MiataMike|MiataMike]] ([[User talk:MiataMike|talk]]) 01:07, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
11100 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11099 +++$+++ 11099 +++$+++ 2010-05-13 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.273739520E09 +++$+++ That's the reason for it, they're links for navigation for the previous and next seasons. Any television season page includes these. Anyway, no problem.  +++$+++ :That's the reason for it, they're links for navigation for the previous and next seasons. Any television season page includes these. Anyway, no problem. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 01:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

535388 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-20 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.166662980E09 +++$+++ Hay nuevas preguntas de la parte de [[User:Malber]] en el RfA que tienes ke responder. Cheers -- '' +++$+++ Hay nuevas preguntas de la parte de [[User:Malber]] en el RfA que tienes ke responder. Cheers -- ''[[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">Szvest</font></font>]]'' - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: orange"><sup>''Wiki me up ®''</sup></font>]]</small> 17:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
535389 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535388 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166664480E09 +++$+++ Me he dado cuenta pero estoy en la oficina y aparte de una ojeada rapida no tengo tiempo de responder bien desde aqui. Las respondo esta tarde. Thanks for the heads up!  +++$+++ :::::::::Me he dado cuenta pero estoy en la oficina y aparte de una ojeada rapida no tengo tiempo de responder bien desde aqui. Las respondo esta tarde. Thanks for the heads up! [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 17:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

11101 +++$+++ Ckatz +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11101 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-20 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.258777200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for sourcing references for the 9th season so quickly. Nice work. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ Thanks for sourcing references for the 9th season so quickly. Nice work. Cheers. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 20:20, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
11102 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11101 +++$+++ 11101 +++$+++ 2009-11-21 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.258843560E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 14:46, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
11103 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11101 +++$+++ 11101 +++$+++ 2011-03-06 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.299483480E09 +++$+++ Fansites are against [[Wikipedia:External links|external link guidelines]]. The website doesn't contain any worthwhile information past the article, it doesn't seem to contain info about the show, but simply advertises a ''SFU'' convention. Wikipedia is not for promoting\/advertising your own personal websites. \u2014 +++$+++ :Fansites are against [[Wikipedia:External links|external link guidelines]]. The website doesn't contain any worthwhile information past the article, it doesn't seem to contain info about the show, but simply advertises a ''SFU'' convention. Wikipedia is not for promoting/advertising your own personal websites. —[[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 23:38, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

535390 +++$+++ Duja +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-21 10:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166725680E09 +++$+++ [[image:SFriendly.gif|18px]].  +++$+++ [[image:SFriendly.gif|18px]]. [[User:Duja|Duja]]<span style="font-size:70%;">[[User talk:Duja|►]]</span> 10:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
535391 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535390 +++$+++ 535390 +++$+++ 2006-12-21 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.166733000E09 +++$+++ Yes, we talked about it for a while but I was quite busy at the time. Thanks very much for your support, Duja. You really put a smile in my face ;-)  +++$+++ :Yes, we talked about it for a while but I was quite busy at the time. Thanks very much for your support, Duja. You really put a smile in my face ;-) [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 12:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

11104 +++$+++ Bovineboy2008 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-02 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.259827140E09 +++$+++ ABC is a fine reference, but myspace isn't.  +++$+++ ABC is a fine reference, but myspace isn't. [[User:Bovineboy2008|<small>BOVINEBOY</small>]][[User talk:Bovineboy2008|'''2008''']] [[Special:Contributions/Bovineboy2008|:)]] 23:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
11105 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11104 +++$+++ 11104 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.259828280E09 +++$+++ That's why I changed the reference. You reverted the edit I made where I changed the reference to ABC. Maybe you just didn't notice I changed the link.  +++$+++ :That's why I changed the reference. You reverted the edit I made where I changed the reference to ABC. Maybe you just didn't notice I changed the link. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 00:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
11106 +++$+++ Bovineboy2008 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11104 +++$+++ 11105 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.259828400E09 +++$+++ Oh! I didn't notice that, I just saw that you undid TheRealFynnShysa's edit. Sorry!  +++$+++ ::Oh! I didn't notice that, I just saw that you undid TheRealFynnShysa's edit. Sorry! [[User:Bovineboy2008|<small>BOVINEBOY</small>]][[User talk:Bovineboy2008|'''2008''']] [[Special:Contributions/Bovineboy2008|:)]] 00:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
11107 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11104 +++$+++ 11106 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.259828520E09 +++$+++ It's all good. :)  +++$+++ :::It's all good. :) [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 00:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

89232 +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-18 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.187438580E09 +++$+++ Heck no. +++$+++ Heck no.[[User:Asiaticus|Asiaticus]] 05:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
89233 +++$+++ Miborovsky +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89232 +++$+++ 89232 +++$+++ 2007-08-18 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.187438760E09 +++$+++ So yes? BTW if there's any information you can provide, I'd greatly appreciate it. --  +++$+++ :So yes? BTW if there's any information you can provide, I'd greatly appreciate it. -- [[User talk:Miborovsky|Миборовский]] 05:06, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
89234 +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89232 +++$+++ 89233 +++$+++ 2007-08-18 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.187439660E09 +++$+++ Sorry, yes go ahead. I look forward to what you have.  +++$+++ :: Sorry, yes go ahead. I look forward to what you have. [[User:Asiaticus|Asiaticus]] 05:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
89235 +++$+++ Miborovsky +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89232 +++$+++ 89234 +++$+++ 2007-08-18 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.187441760E09 +++$+++ Okay done. --  +++$+++ ::: Okay done. -- [[User talk:Miborovsky|Миборовский]] 05:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
89236 +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89232 +++$+++ 89235 +++$+++ 2007-08-18 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.187442780E09 +++$+++ Wow! Nice. Lot of work there. Thanks  +++$+++ :::: Wow! Nice. Lot of work there. Thanks [[User:Asiaticus|Asiaticus]] 06:13, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
89237 +++$+++ Miborovsky +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89232 +++$+++ 89236 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.187614500E09 +++$+++ Yeah I plan to bring it up to featured quality, one day. It's boring work. I thought researching all the hundred or so commanders and their arrival\/departure dates was boring, but typing table markup tops even that. --  +++$+++ :::::Yeah I plan to bring it up to featured quality, one day. It's boring work. I thought researching all the hundred or so commanders and their arrival/departure dates was boring, but typing table markup tops even that. -- [[User talk:Miborovsky|Миборовский]] 05:55, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

535395 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-22 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.166819520E09 +++$+++ Hi Asterion, and congrats on the well going RfA. :-) Thank you for contacting me about the [[Segunda For\xe7a A\xe9rea]]. I probably would've translated it, but it's been deleted by Gandmasterka due to copyvio. Regards.--<strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ Hi Asterion, and congrats on the well going RfA. :-) Thank you for contacting me about the [[Segunda Força Aérea]]. I probably would've translated it, but it's been deleted by Gandmasterka due to copyvio. Regards.--<strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 12:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
535396 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535395 +++$+++ 535395 +++$+++ 2006-12-22 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166851680E09 +++$+++ Gracias. Feliz Navidad! :-) --<strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Gracias. Feliz Navidad! :-) --<strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 21:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
535397 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535395 +++$+++ 535395 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.166900280E09 +++$+++ Ditto. ;-) Thanks Asterion! Best of luck, <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :Ditto. ;-) Thanks Asterion! Best of luck, <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 10:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

11108 +++$+++ Shaneymike +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11108 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-03 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.267657980E09 +++$+++ I noticed you moved every Angel episode back to the way it was before I changed them. Do you really think that is necessary? The reason I did that in the first place was to distinguish them from other TV shows that have similar titles?  +++$+++ I noticed you moved every Angel episode back to the way it was before I changed them. Do you really think that is necessary? The reason I did that in the first place was to distinguish them from other TV shows that have similar titles? [[User:Shaneymike|Shaneymike]] ([[User talk:Shaneymike|talk]]) 15:13, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
11109 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11108 +++$+++ 11108 +++$+++ 2010-03-03 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.267659240E09 +++$+++ I moved them because per naming convention ([[WP:TV-NAME]]) they should be named like that.  +++$+++ :I moved them because per naming convention ([[WP:TV-NAME]]) they should be named like that. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 15:34, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
11110 +++$+++ Shaneymike +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11108 +++$+++ 11109 +++$+++ 2010-03-03 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.267665540E09 +++$+++ I see. Very well then. I shall undo all the reverts I have made.  +++$+++ ::I see. Very well then. I shall undo all the reverts I have made. [[User:Shaneymike|Shaneymike]] ([[User talk:Shaneymike|talk]]) 17:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

307686 +++$+++ Jim62sch +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-13 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.144913520E09 +++$+++ Thanks! They were great.  One thing irks me...I stuck an essay on my user-space on Wiki saying a similar thing about religion and got jumped all over.  I mustn't have the right connexions.   +++$+++ Thanks! They were great.  One thing irks me...I stuck an essay on my user-space on Wiki saying a similar thing about religion and got jumped all over.  I mustn't have the right connexions.  [[User:Jim62sch|<font face="Times New Roman" color="FF2400">&#0149;Jim</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="F4C430">62</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="000000">sch&#0149;</font>]] 00:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
307687 +++$+++ Jim62sch +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307686 +++$+++ 307686 +++$+++ 2006-04-18 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.145416620E09 +++$+++ Where is the Lobey Dosser statue?  In Scotland, I guess?   +++$+++ :Where is the Lobey Dosser statue?  In Scotland, I guess?  [[User:Jim62sch|<font face="Times New Roman" color="FF2400">&#0149;Jim</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="F4C430">62</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="000000">sch&#0149;</font>]] 20:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
307688 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307686 +++$+++ 307687 +++$+++ 2006-04-19 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.145493000E09 +++$+++ It's quite near [[Glasgow University]], and giving my son a lift back to the flat he's sharing gave me the opportunity to grab the requested photies between showers. There's obviously local interest and pride: an elderly man stopped his car and asked if I knew what the statue was about. Apparently he knew Bud Neill, and often stops to help and enlighten puzzled tourists... +++$+++ ::It's quite near [[Glasgow University]], and giving my son a lift back to the flat he's sharing gave me the opportunity to grab the requested photies between showers. There's obviously local interest and pride: an elderly man stopped his car and asked if I knew what the statue was about. Apparently he knew Bud Neill, and often stops to help and enlighten puzzled tourists...[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:30, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

480467 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-25 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.285475760E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to check in again to ask if you're going to have a chance to get to this soon. Since the downloadable \"untagged uncats\" list only takes the first 4,800-5,000 articles off the complete list on any given day, it's now at the point where more than 60 per cent of the list consists of articles that have already been tagged as {{tl|uncategorized stub}} \u2014 and I'm beginning to get concerned that the number's going to hit 100 per cent soon, leaving no room for articles toward the end of the complete list to get picked up.  +++$+++ Just wanted to check in again to ask if you're going to have a chance to get to this soon. Since the downloadable "untagged uncats" list only takes the first 4,800-5,000 articles off the complete list on any given day, it's now at the point where more than 60 per cent of the list consists of articles that have already been tagged as {{tl|uncategorized stub}} — and I'm beginning to get concerned that the number's going to hit 100 per cent soon, leaving no room for articles toward the end of the complete list to get picked up. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 21:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
480468 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480467 +++$+++ 480467 +++$+++ 2010-09-26 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.285564140E09 +++$+++ OK, I believe that should do it - it should now count anything that transcludes {{tl|Cat improve}} or {{tl|Uncategorized stub}} (or their redirects) as tagged. I don't have test data, so I'm not sure. Could you let me know if the results are what you're looking for? -- +++$+++ :OK, I believe that should do it - it should now count anything that transcludes {{tl|Cat improve}} or {{tl|Uncategorized stub}} (or their redirects) as tagged. I don't have test data, so I'm not sure. Could you let me know if the results are what you're looking for? --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 22:09, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
480469 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480467 +++$+++ 480468 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.285580100E09 +++$+++ Great. I'll let you know if any challenges pop up as I'm in the process of actively working with the list, but as of right now the \"untagged\" backlog is down to 4,485 and there are articles beginning with T in the first 1,000 \u2014 which does suggest that it worked. Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::Great. I'll let you know if any challenges pop up as I'm in the process of actively working with the list, but as of right now the "untagged" backlog is down to 4,485 and there are articles beginning with T in the first 1,000 — which does suggest that it worked. Thanks again. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 02:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

11111 +++$+++ MrMoustacheMM +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11111 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-22 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.271929860E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to stop in and say \"Nice work!\" on your edits to List of Trailer Park Boys episodes. Looking a lot better now!  +++$+++ Just wanted to stop in and say "Nice work!" on your edits to List of Trailer Park Boys episodes. Looking a lot better now! [[User:MrMoustacheMM|MrMoustacheMM]] ([[User talk:MrMoustacheMM|talk]]) 02:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
11112 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11111 +++$+++ 11111 +++$+++ 2010-04-22 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.271968620E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Thought it needed a clean-up.  +++$+++ :Thanks! Thought it needed a clean-up. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 13:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

273256 +++$+++ Meno25 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-14 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.166119740E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Meno25|Meno25]] 10:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
273257 +++$+++ Meno25 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273256 +++$+++ 273256 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.166164200E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Meno25|Meno25]] 22:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

11113 +++$+++ Alatari +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-24 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.272122640E09 +++$+++ It was just easiest to revert to get the Thursday in the lead-in.  I don't really care what the rest of the article says about Thursday as long as you can come to the page and within 3 seconds see that the show is on Thursdays.  No reason to send people off to another website just to figure that out.  I found out Dino Stamatopoulos from [[Moral Orel]] was involved and instantly wanted to know when I could watch it and Wikipedia article didn't mention Thursday once.  That was irritating.   +++$+++ It was just easiest to revert to get the Thursday in the lead-in.  I don't really care what the rest of the article says about Thursday as long as you can come to the page and within 3 seconds see that the show is on Thursdays.  No reason to send people off to another website just to figure that out.  I found out Dino Stamatopoulos from [[Moral Orel]] was involved and instantly wanted to know when I could watch it and Wikipedia article didn't mention Thursday once.  That was irritating.  [[User:Alatari|Alatari]] ([[User talk:Alatari|talk]]) 08:24, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
11114 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11113 +++$+++ 11113 +++$+++ 2010-04-24 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.272141660E09 +++$+++ I removed the Thursday stuff because usually, the day of which it airs isn't mentioned - just the date. The timeslot is shown in the Ratings section. I removed the Thursday stuff because it was redundant, but I keep it in the lead-in.  +++$+++ :I removed the Thursday stuff because usually, the day of which it airs isn't mentioned - just the date. The timeslot is shown in the Ratings section. I removed the Thursday stuff because it was redundant, but I keep it in the lead-in. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 13:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

273258 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-15 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.166224200E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. VP2 has a one-minute time limit for reviewing an edit (\"we can't sit on an edit\"). During that time we have to decide if that edit was vandalism or not. Usually the time limit's good enough, but sometimes it can be a major pain coz some sneaky edits could require more time to investigate. It's also not very convenient when a patroller decides to fix something they noticed on the article, such as typos, or placing tags. Nevertheless, it's a great tool. :-) Regards.--<strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ Hi Sarah. VP2 has a one-minute time limit for reviewing an edit ("we can't sit on an edit"). During that time we have to decide if that edit was vandalism or not. Usually the time limit's good enough, but sometimes it can be a major pain coz some sneaky edits could require more time to investigate. It's also not very convenient when a patroller decides to fix something they noticed on the article, such as typos, or placing tags. Nevertheless, it's a great tool. :-) Regards.--<strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 15:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
273259 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273258 +++$+++ 273258 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.166224380E09 +++$+++ Oh, and if you exceed the time limit, the edit goes back to the pool of unreviewed edits controlled by IRC vpbot.--<strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Oh, and if you exceed the time limit, the edit goes back to the pool of unreviewed edits controlled by IRC vpbot.--<strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 15:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
273260 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273258 +++$+++ 273259 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.166225160E09 +++$+++ You should really try it. Vandalfight had never been easier. Side effect: your userpage will occasionally say nasty things about yourself. :-)Best regards,--<strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::You should really try it. Vandalfight had never been easier. Side effect: your userpage will occasionally say nasty things about yourself. :-)Best regards,--<strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 15:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

11115 +++$+++ Alatari +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11115 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-25 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.272196260E09 +++$+++ Thankyou.  So it's the norm to not show the day of the week in the lead-in?  +++$+++ Thankyou.  So it's the norm to not show the day of the week in the lead-in? [[User:Alatari|Alatari]] ([[User talk:Alatari|talk]]) 04:51, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
11116 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11115 +++$+++ 11115 +++$+++ 2010-04-25 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.272230100E09 +++$+++ When using dates on Wikipedia, the day of the week is not included (as far as I can tell), so that's why. Usually TV show articles will have a section on their seasonal ratings (such as [[Community (TV series)#Ratings|here]] for ''Community''), and there's where the timeslot info can be found.  +++$+++ :When using dates on Wikipedia, the day of the week is not included (as far as I can tell), so that's why. Usually TV show articles will have a section on their seasonal ratings (such as [[Community (TV series)#Ratings|here]] for ''Community''), and there's where the timeslot info can be found. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 14:15, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

11117 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-26 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.272320940E09 +++$+++ Please do not upload screenshots for identification only. It is not permitted by our [[WP:NFC|non-free content]] policy. Thank you, ''''' +++$+++ Please do not upload screenshots for identification only. It is not permitted by our [[WP:NFC|non-free content]] policy. Thank you, '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 15:29, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
11118 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11117 +++$+++ 11117 +++$+++ 2010-04-26 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.272322920E09 +++$+++ Will they be deleted? What must I add to for the them to be okay? I've seen tons of other television episodes articles that use screenshots from the episodes.  +++$+++ :Will they be deleted? What must I add to for the them to be okay? I've seen tons of other television episodes articles that use screenshots from the episodes. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 16:02, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
11119 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11117 +++$+++ 11118 +++$+++ 2010-04-26 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.272323220E09 +++$+++ If you want to upload a screenshot it must meet the [[WP:NFCC|non-free content criteria]], specifically #8: \"Non-free content is used only if its presence would ''significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic'', and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.\" ''''' +++$+++ ::If you want to upload a screenshot it must meet the [[WP:NFCC|non-free content criteria]], specifically #8: "Non-free content is used only if its presence would ''significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic'', and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 16:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
11120 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11117 +++$+++ 11119 +++$+++ 2010-04-26 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.272323940E09 +++$+++ I updated the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:Buffy_1x01.jpg image], is that an acceptable summary?  +++$+++ :::I updated the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Buffy_1x01.jpg image], is that an acceptable summary? [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 16:19, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
11121 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11117 +++$+++ 11120 +++$+++ 2010-04-26 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.272325860E09 +++$+++ ''''' +++$+++ ::::'''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 16:51, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

273262 +++$+++ Trödel +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-15 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.166237340E09 +++$+++ fyi - I am drafting a note to him offering to mentor him some - however, because I will be taking the bar exam (in my 2nd state) I may not be as available as I need to be - so I was wondering if you could help as well. --<font color=\"#06C\"> +++$+++ fyi - I am drafting a note to him offering to mentor him some - however, because I will be taking the bar exam (in my 2nd state) I may not be as available as I need to be - so I was wondering if you could help as well. --<font color="#06C">[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]]</font> 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
273263 +++$+++ Trödel +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273262 +++$+++ 273262 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.166238540E09 +++$+++ Thanks - I completed my note. I want to see how he responds - and if things go well I'll let him know that you (and hopefully riana) have also offered your help should I not be available. --<font color=\"#06C\"> +++$+++ : Thanks - I completed my note. I want to see how he responds - and if things go well I'll let him know that you (and hopefully riana) have also offered your help should I not be available. --<font color="#06C">[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]]</font> 19:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
273264 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273262 +++$+++ 273263 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.166243700E09 +++$+++ I saw this block, and feel it's somewhat warranted. Sometimes, over-eagerness can lead someone into areas of being a right old PITA. I had my fair share of Nathan early on and posted to [[WP:AN\/I]] and [[WP:AWNB]] which both received no reply :( Gotta be careful though. When you deny people something they obviously enjoy, the outcome isn't always the one we want. --  +++$+++ ::I saw this block, and feel it's somewhat warranted. Sometimes, over-eagerness can lead someone into areas of being a right old PITA. I had my fair share of Nathan early on and posted to [[WP:AN/I]] and [[WP:AWNB]] which both received no reply :( Gotta be careful though. When you deny people something they obviously enjoy, the outcome isn't always the one we want. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 20:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
273265 +++$+++ Trödel +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273262 +++$+++ 273264 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.166246580E09 +++$+++ Agree - hopefully some good will come of it. --<font color=\"#06C\"> +++$+++ ::: Agree - hopefully some good will come of it. --<font color="#06C">[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]]</font> 21:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
273266 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273262 +++$+++ 273265 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.166246760E09 +++$+++ I've also added my opinion to [[WP:AN\/I]] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=94579504] --  +++$+++ ::::I've also added my opinion to [[WP:AN/I]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=94579504] -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 21:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

535409 +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-25 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.167086040E09 +++$+++ Ol\xe1. Bom Natal! it is not a Parish Church. well, it is also a parish church (Igreja Paroquial), but this is the main church of the municipality. I Think the English term is \"First Church\", translating directly into English it would be \"Mother Church\". As the name Matriz is important I choose to use the name Matriz directly, maybe not the best option, but I don't see an English name often used for these kind of churches. If there is, we can change it.-- +++$+++ Olá. Bom Natal! it is not a Parish Church. well, it is also a parish church (Igreja Paroquial), but this is the main church of the municipality. I Think the English term is "First Church", translating directly into English it would be "Mother Church". As the name Matriz is important I choose to use the name Matriz directly, maybe not the best option, but I don't see an English name often used for these kind of churches. If there is, we can change it.--[[User:PedroPVZ|Pedro]] 14:34, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
535410 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535409 +++$+++ 535409 +++$+++ 2006-12-25 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.167086160E09 +++$+++ I see. What about \"Main Church\"?  +++$+++ :I see. What about "Main Church"? [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 14:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
535411 +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535409 +++$+++ 535409 +++$+++ 2006-12-25 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.167086460E09 +++$+++ Is Main church often used in English? --- +++$+++ *Is Main church often used in English? ---[[User:PedroPVZ|Pedro]] 14:41, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
535412 +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535409 +++$+++ 535409 +++$+++ 2006-12-25 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.167087600E09 +++$+++ A ''Igreja Matriz'' is also a Parish Church. But there are 14 parish churches. In each parish there can be several others. ''Matriz'' is the main one of these parish churches. Maybe in English there's not these kind of churches, and they only have cathedrals. But in Portugal cathedrals (''Catedral'' or ''S\xe9'') is only found in main cities (historically). The Name of Igreja Matriz can be: ''Igreja Matriz da P\xf3voa de Varzim'' (lit. Mother Church of P\xf3voa de Varzim) or ''Igreja Paroquial Nossa Senhora da Concei\xe7\xe3o'' (Parish Church of Our lady of Conception).-- +++$+++ *A ''Igreja Matriz'' is also a Parish Church. But there are 14 parish churches. In each parish there can be several others. ''Matriz'' is the main one of these parish churches. Maybe in English there's not these kind of churches, and they only have cathedrals. But in Portugal cathedrals (''Catedral'' or ''Sé'') is only found in main cities (historically). The Name of Igreja Matriz can be: ''Igreja Matriz da Póvoa de Varzim'' (lit. Mother Church of Póvoa de Varzim) or ''Igreja Paroquial Nossa Senhora da Conceição'' (Parish Church of Our lady of Conception).--[[User:PedroPVZ|Pedro]] 15:00, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
535413 +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535409 +++$+++ 535409 +++$+++ 2006-12-25 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.167088680E09 +++$+++ I've seen and used that term: \"First Church\", but that page also uses \"Matriz Church in Itajai City\", maybe because Matriz, like in here, is also a popular name. Well, I don't know. \"First Church\" then? For what I've seen, in the US several cities can be part of the same parish (church). While in here, each city can have several parish churches. In P\xf3voa, traditionally 3, now 5, with the city's expansion. -- +++$+++ *I've seen and used that term: "First Church", but that page also uses "Matriz Church in Itajai City", maybe because Matriz, like in here, is also a popular name. Well, I don't know. "First Church" then? For what I've seen, in the US several cities can be part of the same parish (church). While in here, each city can have several parish churches. In Póvoa, traditionally 3, now 5, with the city's expansion. --[[User:PedroPVZ|Pedro]] 15:18, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
535414 +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535409 +++$+++ 535409 +++$+++ 2006-12-25 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.167092100E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I don't know, maybe the Brits have somekind of Matriz Church, and we don't know it yet. As for the article, I would appreciate some more help with ''the'' English. Feliz Navidad! -- +++$+++ *Thanks! I don't know, maybe the Brits have somekind of Matriz Church, and we don't know it yet. As for the article, I would appreciate some more help with ''the'' English. Feliz Navidad! --[[User:PedroPVZ|Pedro]] 16:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

11122 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-26 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.272327180E09 +++$+++ Updated again.  +++$+++ Updated again. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 17:13, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
11123 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11122 +++$+++ 11122 +++$+++ 2010-04-26 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.272330540E09 +++$+++ I don't think you understand what I'm saying. You can't just add \"It gives visual information regarding the television episode in ways which text cannot\" to the description page. That statement is not true at all. I can easily describe the image in words: \"Buffy opens a door.\" (etc.) ''''' +++$+++ :I don't think you understand what I'm saying. You can't just add "It gives visual information regarding the television episode in ways which text cannot" to the description page. That statement is not true at all. I can easily describe the image in words: "Buffy opens a door." (etc.) '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 18:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
11124 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11122 +++$+++ 11123 +++$+++ 2010-04-26 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.272330960E09 +++$+++ Okay, well I don't get what I need to do then, as I looked at other examples for images being used for television episodes and they basically have the exact same thing or even less, and those images have been left alone.  +++$+++ ::Okay, well I don't get what I need to do then, as I looked at other examples for images being used for television episodes and they basically have the exact same thing or even less, and those images have been left alone. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 18:16, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
11125 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11122 +++$+++ 11124 +++$+++ 2010-04-27 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.272400740E09 +++$+++ Just because there are other articles with images like these doesn't mean it's allowed. Lots of articles contain [[WP:BLP|BLP]] violations too. Does that make it okay to create a BLP violation? ''''' +++$+++ :::Just because there are other articles with images like these doesn't mean it's allowed. Lots of articles contain [[WP:BLP|BLP]] violations too. Does that make it okay to create a BLP violation? '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 13:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
11126 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11122 +++$+++ 11125 +++$+++ 2010-04-27 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.272401460E09 +++$+++ Then tell me the bottom line, will they be tagged for deletion or what? Because I feel I've been randomly pinpointed when I uploaded a bunch of images in a row that pretty much use the same style of rationale that thousands of other images have. What ''exactly'' is wrong \u2013 the image I uploaded, its description, the rationale I use, the purpose, etc.?  +++$+++ ::::Then tell me the bottom line, will they be tagged for deletion or what? Because I feel I've been randomly pinpointed when I uploaded a bunch of images in a row that pretty much use the same style of rationale that thousands of other images have. What ''exactly'' is wrong – the image I uploaded, its description, the rationale I use, the purpose, etc.? [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 13:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
11127 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11122 +++$+++ 11126 +++$+++ 2010-04-27 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.272402360E09 +++$+++ They ''should'' be tagged for deletion. That doesn't mean they will be anytime soon though. The image copyright backlog is rather big right now, and, as you say, there are thousands of images like these. What's wrong about images such as [[:File:Buffy 1x01.jpg]] is that they can easily be replaced by words ([[WP:NFCC]] #1). Non-free content should only be used when it significantly increases readers' understanding of the topic ([[WP:NFCC]] #8). ''''' +++$+++ :::::They ''should'' be tagged for deletion. That doesn't mean they will be anytime soon though. The image copyright backlog is rather big right now, and, as you say, there are thousands of images like these. What's wrong about images such as [[:File:Buffy 1x01.jpg]] is that they can easily be replaced by words ([[WP:NFCC]] #1). Non-free content should only be used when it significantly increases readers' understanding of the topic ([[WP:NFCC]] #8). '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 14:06, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
11128 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11122 +++$+++ 11127 +++$+++ 2010-04-27 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.272407640E09 +++$+++ My plan was to get an image for every episode, picking a key moment or a memorable one that you can identity the episode with, so once you see the image, it's easier to recognize what the episode is about. If you're saying not ''every'' episode article is worthy of that, I understand - and only very important episodes (ex. season finale, series finale, big episodes) should have images, then I guess I could just do that. As for it being replaced by words, well, I'm using the image in the infobox, so the image is associated with the episode. I'm not just tossing random images throughout the episode guide. The image in question shows Buffy entering the school library for the first time, and the library becomes a very important location for the first three seasons. I don't see how an infobox that ''has'' an image does not improve the article significantly.  +++$+++ ::::::My plan was to get an image for every episode, picking a key moment or a memorable one that you can identity the episode with, so once you see the image, it's easier to recognize what the episode is about. If you're saying not ''every'' episode article is worthy of that, I understand - and only very important episodes (ex. season finale, series finale, big episodes) should have images, then I guess I could just do that. As for it being replaced by words, well, I'm using the image in the infobox, so the image is associated with the episode. I'm not just tossing random images throughout the episode guide. The image in question shows Buffy entering the school library for the first time, and the library becomes a very important location for the first three seasons. I don't see how an infobox that ''has'' an image does not improve the article significantly. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 15:34, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
11129 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11122 +++$+++ 11128 +++$+++ 2010-04-27 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.272410460E09 +++$+++ No, it doesn't matter if it's a screenshot from a regular episode or from a season finale. You have to think to yourself, \"Does this image significantly help readers understand what is written in the text of the article, or is the text alone enough?\" [[:File:Buffy 1x01.jpg]] is clearly not needed to understand the text in the [[Welcome to the Hellmouth]] article. ''''' +++$+++ :::::::No, it doesn't matter if it's a screenshot from a regular episode or from a season finale. You have to think to yourself, "Does this image significantly help readers understand what is written in the text of the article, or is the text alone enough?" [[:File:Buffy 1x01.jpg]] is clearly not needed to understand the text in the [[Welcome to the Hellmouth]] article. '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 16:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

613523 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-09 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.234215780E09 +++$+++ Please do not add the book cover image until a consensus is established in talk. I and several others hold that it contravenes our policy on the use of images. If you continue to do this you are at risk of a block. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Please do not add the book cover image until a consensus is established in talk. I and several others hold that it contravenes our policy on the use of images. If you continue to do this you are at risk of a block. Thanks. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 13:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
613524 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-09 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.234216320E09 +++$+++ Your edit was in breach of [[WP:NFCC]] and [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. -- +++$+++ ::Your edit was in breach of [[WP:NFCC]] and [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 13:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

273270 +++$+++ Selmo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-16 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.166315760E09 +++$+++ I have revised my answer to Q1. I forgot to be specific last night. --  +++$+++ I have revised my answer to Q1. I forgot to be specific last night. -- [[User:Selmo|<font color="red"><b>Selmo</b></font>]] <sup><i>([[User_talk:Selmo|talk]])</i></sup> 16:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
273271 +++$+++ Selmo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273270 +++$+++ 273270 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.166361480E09 +++$+++ For what it's worth, I just revised my anwser to your question. Thank you for participating. --  +++$+++ :For what it's worth, I just revised my anwser to your question. Thank you for participating. -- [[User:Selmo|<font color="red"><b>Selmo</b></font>]] <sup><i>([[User_talk:Selmo|talk]])</i></sup> 05:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

535416 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535416 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-27 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.167241620E09 +++$+++ ...As a native Arabic speaker and a long-standing membr of wikipedia: [[Talk:Shi%27a_Islam#Poll_for_clarification]]. Thanks,  +++$+++ ...As a native Arabic speaker and a long-standing membr of wikipedia: [[Talk:Shi%27a_Islam#Poll_for_clarification]]. Thanks, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 09:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535417 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535416 +++$+++ 535416 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.167242640E09 +++$+++ Hi Asterion. Done. -- '' +++$+++ :Hi Asterion. Done. -- ''[[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">Szvest</font></font>]]'' - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up ®''</sup></font>]]</small> 10:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

11130 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-27 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.272428820E09 +++$+++ I checked out your contributions page on your userpage and I saw some ''Office'' episodes under the Good article reviews section (such as [[Heavy Competition]]), which I guess that means you have contributed to, and they all contain images in the infobox. I checked the summaries and rationales for those images, and they definitely have less information than I put for my image uploads. So I ask you, did you flag those images and\/or told the uploaders that those images don't met the criteria?   +++$+++ I checked out your contributions page on your userpage and I saw some ''Office'' episodes under the Good article reviews section (such as [[Heavy Competition]]), which I guess that means you have contributed to, and they all contain images in the infobox. I checked the summaries and rationales for those images, and they definitely have less information than I put for my image uploads. So I ask you, did you flag those images and/or told the uploaders that those images don't met the criteria?  [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 21:27, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
11131 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11130 +++$+++ 11130 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.272491760E09 +++$+++ I didn't contribute to those articles, I only reviewed them. This was done almost a year ago, before I knew about the non-free content criteria. In June of last year I had an RfA that failed in part because of this lack of knowledge. [[Partners in Crime (Doctor Who)]] (an FA) is a good example of when to use a non-free image. The design of the aliens is heavily discussed in the production section, and the image actually helps readers understand th text. ''''' +++$+++ :I didn't contribute to those articles, I only reviewed them. This was done almost a year ago, before I knew about the non-free content criteria. In June of last year I had an RfA that failed in part because of this lack of knowledge. [[Partners in Crime (Doctor Who)]] (an FA) is a good example of when to use a non-free image. The design of the aliens is heavily discussed in the production section, and the image actually helps readers understand th text. '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 14:56, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
11132 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11130 +++$+++ 11131 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.272492240E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm going to continue to upload images for certain episodes in which I think the image will improve\/help the article. Thanks for all the replies.  +++$+++ ::Well, I'm going to continue to upload images for certain episodes in which I think the image will improve/help the article. Thanks for all the replies. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 15:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

526143 +++$+++ CTSWyneken +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526143 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-03 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.154595300E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you have been working on it and it looks good enough for me. I'm not sure what we want to do with unit histories, But I like it. It would be a goldmine for me if it was my Dad's unit. (He served in the Airborne in Korea). If I don't miss my guess, yours will be the first unit history we've approved. Congratulations! I'll pass it tomorrow. --<b><font style=\"font-family: Andale Mono IPA\" color=\"navy\"> +++$+++ I noticed that you have been working on it and it looks good enough for me. I'm not sure what we want to do with unit histories, But I like it. It would be a goldmine for me if it was my Dad's unit. (He served in the Airborne in Korea). If I don't miss my guess, yours will be the first unit history we've approved. Congratulations! I'll pass it tomorrow. --<b><font style="font-family: Andale Mono IPA" color="navy">[[User:CTSWyneken|CTS]]</font></b><font style="font-family: Andale Mono IPA" color="maroon">Wyneken</font><sup><font style="font-family: Andale Mono IPA" color="maroon">[[User talk:CTSWyneken|(talk)]]</font></sup> 01:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
526144 +++$+++ CTSWyneken +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526143 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.154629860E09 +++$+++ No slight intended. I should have said, \"you all.\" I sometimes forget which talk page I'm on. Anyway, congrats! By the way, there are two other listings under units, but nothing on the battalion or smaller level -- yet! 8-) --<b><font style=\"font-family: Andale Mono IPA\" color=\"navy\"> +++$+++ :: No slight intended. I should have said, "you all." I sometimes forget which talk page I'm on. Anyway, congrats! By the way, there are two other listings under units, but nothing on the battalion or smaller level -- yet! 8-) --<b><font style="font-family: Andale Mono IPA" color="navy">[[User:CTSWyneken|CTS]]</font></b><font style="font-family: Andale Mono IPA" color="maroon">Wyneken</font><sup><font style="font-family: Andale Mono IPA" color="maroon">[[User talk:CTSWyneken|(talk)]]</font></sup> 11:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

11133 +++$+++ Tamfang +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11133 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-02 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.272863640E09 +++$+++ Glad you like 'em \u2013 though it appears above that it may all be for nought! \u2014 +++$+++ Glad you like 'em – though it appears above that it may all be for nought! —[[User:Tamfang|Tamfang]] ([[User talk:Tamfang|talk]]) 22:14, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
11134 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11133 +++$+++ 11133 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.272865380E09 +++$+++ Well, hopefully not.  +++$+++ :Well, hopefully not. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 22:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

535422 +++$+++ Redux +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-27 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.167262080E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge!  +++$+++ Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge! [[User:Redux|Redux]] 15:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535423 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535422 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.167262380E09 +++$+++ Congrats Asterion and Happy New Year. -- '' +++$+++ ::Congrats Asterion and Happy New Year. -- ''[[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">Szvest</font></font>]]'' - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up ®''</sup></font>]]</small> 15:33, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535424 +++$+++ Flcelloguy +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535422 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.167263280E09 +++$+++ Thank you, and congrats on your adminship!  +++$+++ :::Thank you, and congrats on your adminship! [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] <small>([[User talk:Flcelloguy|A <font color="brown">note?</font>]])</small> 15:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535425 +++$+++ Laughing Man +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535422 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.167263400E09 +++$+++ I missed the vote, but am glad that it was a unanimous decision, if anyone deserved that it was you, congratulations :) \/\/  +++$+++ :::: I missed the vote, but am glad that it was a unanimous decision, if anyone deserved that it was you, congratulations :) // [[User:Laughing Man|Laughing Man]] 15:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

11136 +++$+++ Morenooso +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11136 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-26 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.274865840E09 +++$+++ Re: [[User:Daniel10600]], I think he may be [[Daniel LaHue]]. All his edits came mostly to that article and now 24. ---- +++$+++ Re: [[User:Daniel10600]], I think he may be [[Daniel LaHue]]. All his edits came mostly to that article and now 24. ----[[User:Morenooso|moreno oso]] ([[User talk:Morenooso#top|talk]]) 02:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
11137 +++$+++ Morenooso +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11136 +++$+++ 11136 +++$+++ 2010-05-26 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.274867820E09 +++$+++ He took down the maintenance tags I placed on the Daniel LaHue article he created. ---- +++$+++ :He took down the maintenance tags I placed on the Daniel LaHue article he created. ----[[User:Morenooso|moreno oso]] ([[User talk:Morenooso#top|talk]]) 02:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
11138 +++$+++ Morenooso +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11136 +++$+++ 11137 +++$+++ 2010-05-26 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.274870520E09 +++$+++ When I just added the citation needed templates, I noticed that Daniel LaHue is categorized as a MIT grad but yet that info does not appear in his IMDb bio. Kind of funny how the article reads exactly the same as the IMDb entry about how a show name came to be named for \"his friends\". ---- +++$+++ ::When I just added the citation needed templates, I noticed that Daniel LaHue is categorized as a MIT grad but yet that info does not appear in his IMDb bio. Kind of funny how the article reads exactly the same as the IMDb entry about how a show name came to be named for "his friends". ----[[User:Morenooso|moreno oso]] ([[User talk:Morenooso#top|talk]]) 03:42, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
11139 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11136 +++$+++ 11136 +++$+++ 2010-05-26 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.274905440E09 +++$+++ The article needs to be tagged for deletion. It's complete nonsense, obviously he's just creating a fake article on himself stating he has written for ''24'' and ''Prison Break'', it's laughable.  +++$+++ :The article needs to be tagged for deletion. It's complete nonsense, obviously he's just creating a fake article on himself stating he has written for ''24'' and ''Prison Break'', it's laughable. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 13:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
11140 +++$+++ Morenooso +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11136 +++$+++ 11139 +++$+++ 2010-05-26 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.274907720E09 +++$+++ I suggest you nominate it. ---- +++$+++ ::I suggest you nominate it. ----[[User:Morenooso|moreno oso]] ([[User talk:Morenooso#top|talk]]) 14:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
11141 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11136 +++$+++ 11140 +++$+++ 2010-05-26 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.274916240E09 +++$+++ I've nominated it now.  +++$+++ :::I've nominated it now. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 16:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

535426 +++$+++ Kukini +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-27 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.167264060E09 +++$+++ And welcome to the cleaning crew! -- +++$+++ And welcome to the cleaning crew! --[[User:Kukini|Kukini]] 16:01, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535427 +++$+++ Ganfon +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.167264180E09 +++$+++ I never have any problem supporting a well deserving candidate. Congrads. +++$+++ ::I never have any problem supporting a well deserving candidate. Congrads.[[User:Ganfon|Ganfon]] 16:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535428 +++$+++ Garcilaso +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.167265080E09 +++$+++ \xa1Enhorabuena, Asterion! Espero que te quede algo de tiempo entre bloqueo y bloqueo para seguir haciendo buenas aportaciones :-) y felices fiestas!-- +++$+++ :::¡Enhorabuena, Asterion! Espero que te quede algo de tiempo entre bloqueo y bloqueo para seguir haciendo buenas aportaciones :-) y felices fiestas!--[[User:Garcilaso|Garcilaso]] 16:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535429 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.167265260E09 +++$+++ Muchas gracias. A ver si cuelgo las fotos de Sevilla en alg\xfan \xe1lbum online pues hace tanto tiempo que las hice que se me ha olvidado de que iglesia era cada una. As\xed me ayudas a identificarlas y luego las subo a Commons. Saludos,  +++$+++ ::::Muchas gracias. A ver si cuelgo las fotos de Sevilla en algún álbum online pues hace tanto tiempo que las hice que se me ha olvidado de que iglesia era cada una. Así me ayudas a identificarlas y luego las subo a Commons. Saludos, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 16:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535430 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.167268140E09 +++$+++ Indeed, congrats, sorry I wasn't here to coach you, but you didn't really need any help after all. Let me know if you need help with anything.  +++$+++ :::Indeed, congrats, sorry I wasn't here to coach you, but you didn't really need any help after all. Let me know if you need help with anything. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 17:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535431 +++$+++ Just H +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.167268680E09 +++$+++ Ditto!(I continued the congrats on my talk page per your talk page rules).  +++$+++ ::Ditto!(I continued the congrats on my talk page per your talk page rules). [[User:Just H|Just H]] 17:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535432 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.167268860E09 +++$+++ If you are looking for something excuse to use your new tools, [[C:CSD]] is pretty full.  +++$+++ :If you are looking for something excuse to use your new tools, [[C:CSD]] is pretty full. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 17:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535433 +++$+++ Tennis Dynamite +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ 535432 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.167272100E09 +++$+++ Yes, congratulations! '''[[User:Tennis Dynamite|<font color=\"red\">T<\/font><font color=\"green\">ennis<\/font>]] [[User Talk:Tennis Dynamite|<font color=\"green\">Dy<\/font><font color=\"red\">N<\/font><font color=\"green\">ami<\/font><font color=\"red\">T<\/font><font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]]''' <sup>( +++$+++ ::Yes, congratulations! '''[[User:Tennis Dynamite|<font color="red">T</font><font color="green">ennis</font>]] [[User Talk:Tennis Dynamite|<font color="green">Dy</font><font color="red">N</font><font color="green">ami</font><font color="red">T</font><font color="green">e</font>]]''' <sup>([[User:Tennis Dynamite/My Autograph Book|sign here]])</sup> 18:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535434 +++$+++ Agathoclea +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ 535433 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.167273360E09 +++$+++ Glad you made it - it is a steep learning curve.  +++$+++ :::Glad you made it - it is a steep learning curve. [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] 18:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535435 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ 535434 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.167280980E09 +++$+++ Congrats Asterion, keep up the good work!  +++$+++ ::::Congrats Asterion, keep up the good work! [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 20:43, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
535436 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ 535426 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.167308520E09 +++$+++ Congrats from me, too - you'll be a fine admin. If you ever need any help with your shiny new mop, my talk page is always open :)  +++$+++ :Congrats from me, too - you'll be a fine admin. If you ever need any help with your shiny new mop, my talk page is always open :) [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 04:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

273283 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-17 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.166362800E09 +++$+++ Sarah, you are ok.  Thank you for showing me that there are some people who read these things.  At this point, I won't pursue it anymore - it is not that big of a deal.  I just wanted someone to understand what was going on.  And yes, the article is awful, and the references do not meet any standard for a credible paper.  Wiki or otherwise.  And this has been typical of this editor - and not just in that article.  I will now go back to my (real) work and another article that I am tinkering with.  At least there, I have helped add some points on that are useful to an article.  That is not possible when there is a WP:Own of an article .  I am getting accustomed to the WP:TLA (three letter acronym).   Thanks again.  And please do look into the article itself, when you have a chance.  It's a bad example for any publication.   +++$+++ Sarah, you are ok.  Thank you for showing me that there are some people who read these things.  At this point, I won't pursue it anymore - it is not that big of a deal.  I just wanted someone to understand what was going on.  And yes, the article is awful, and the references do not meet any standard for a credible paper.  Wiki or otherwise.  And this has been typical of this editor - and not just in that article.  I will now go back to my (real) work and another article that I am tinkering with.  At least there, I have helped add some points on that are useful to an article.  That is not possible when there is a WP:Own of an article .  I am getting accustomed to the WP:TLA (three letter acronym).   Thanks again.  And please do look into the article itself, when you have a chance.  It's a bad example for any publication.  [[User:Jance|Jance]] 05:40, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
273284 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273283 +++$+++ 273283 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.166367780E09 +++$+++ The statement in question: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AG._Patrick_Maxwell&diff=94669300&oldid=94661699].  I was advised in August by e-mail from Tyrenius that office action was sought and that the page history had been erased.  Jance's statements, placed at the top of the talk page in capital letters about how this was a \"FLUFF PIECE\" and a puff piece were clearly not in the spirit of that. --  +++$+++ :The statement in question: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AG._Patrick_Maxwell&diff=94669300&oldid=94661699].  I was advised in August by e-mail from Tyrenius that office action was sought and that the page history had been erased.  Jance's statements, placed at the top of the talk page in capital letters about how this was a "FLUFF PIECE" and a puff piece were clearly not in the spirit of that. -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|'''Samir''' <small>धर्म</small>]] 07:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
273285 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273283 +++$+++ 273284 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.166368560E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, (1) I agree that the article needs signficant work in terms of wording and references (2) My understanding was that the article was sent to Brad for office consideration (by David Gerard) and that the consensus reached was that any questionable edits to the article or talk page should be immediately removed.  Tyrenius would have the details.  I thought Jance's wording in her descriptors of the article was inappropriate, and removed it.  The article needs improvement, but there are better ways of saying that then capital letters \"FLUFF PIECE\" on the top of the talk page --  +++$+++ ::Hi Sarah, (1) I agree that the article needs signficant work in terms of wording and references (2) My understanding was that the article was sent to Brad for office consideration (by David Gerard) and that the consensus reached was that any questionable edits to the article or talk page should be immediately removed.  Tyrenius would have the details.  I thought Jance's wording in her descriptors of the article was inappropriate, and removed it.  The article needs improvement, but there are better ways of saying that then capital letters "FLUFF PIECE" on the top of the talk page -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|'''Samir''' <small>धर्म</small>]] 07:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
273286 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273283 +++$+++ 273285 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.166378220E09 +++$+++ So WP:PEACOCK in all caps and \"puff piece\" written by other editors at the top of the talk page were also removed?  Just curious, Samir.  +++$+++ :::So WP:PEACOCK in all caps and "puff piece" written by other editors at the top of the talk page were also removed?  Just curious, Samir. [[User:Jance|Jance]] 09:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
273287 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273283 +++$+++ 273285 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.166368980E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I think the summary would be that Office was consulted, a decision was made to remove questionable edits on the spot (on administrator's best judgment), but that Danny did not place the article under WP:OFFICE protection.  I judged Jance's comment to be inappropriate with respect to that and removed it.  Thanks again for your levelheadedness in dealing with this --  +++$+++ :::Hi Sarah, I think the summary would be that Office was consulted, a decision was made to remove questionable edits on the spot (on administrator's best judgment), but that Danny did not place the article under WP:OFFICE protection.  I judged Jance's comment to be inappropriate with respect to that and removed it.  Thanks again for your levelheadedness in dealing with this -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|'''Samir''' <small>धर्म</small>]] 07:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

11142 +++$+++ Knownalias +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-13 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.279080900E09 +++$+++ This is when I love my OCD.  Too tired to properly cite it myself, so here's you Hart Hanson Twitter link -- http:\/\/twitter.com\/HartHanson\/status\/14464466077 --  +++$+++ This is when I love my OCD.  Too tired to properly cite it myself, so here's you Hart Hanson Twitter link -- http://twitter.com/HartHanson/status/14464466077 -- [[User:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Kristen ITC"; color:#23297A'>KnownAlias</span>]][[user talk:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Segoe script"; color:#614051'><small>  contact</small></span>]] 21:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
11143 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11142 +++$+++ 11142 +++$+++ 2010-07-13 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.279082700E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much! All I could find was blog posts and the like that mentioned that or copied what his tweet was, and even after googling his exact tweet about the episodes, it didn't even show up. So thanks again.  +++$+++ :Thanks so much! All I could find was blog posts and the like that mentioned that or copied what his tweet was, and even after googling his exact tweet about the episodes, it didn't even show up. So thanks again. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 21:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

11144 +++$+++ Tamfang +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11144 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-05 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.281008940E09 +++$+++ I'm flattered that you copied my change of \"aired along with\" &rarr; \"coincided with\"; but for ''Buffy'' 4\u20135 \/ ''Angel'' 1\u20132 I would not have done so, as they '''were''' a package! \u2014 +++$+++ I'm flattered that you copied my change of "aired along with" &rarr; "coincided with"; but for ''Buffy'' 4–5 / ''Angel'' 1–2 I would not have done so, as they '''were''' a package! —[[User:Tamfang|Tamfang]] ([[User talk:Tamfang|talk]]) 04:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
11145 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11144 +++$+++ 11144 +++$+++ 2010-08-05 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.281038940E09 +++$+++ Oh, I thought you were just changing the phrase to something more \"elegant\", so I changed it for all the other ones. \"Aired along with\" should be used for those seasons, because there ''were'' crossovers between the shows, is that what you mean? Or because they were on the same network for those seasons?  +++$+++ :Oh, I thought you were just changing the phrase to something more "elegant", so I changed it for all the other ones. "Aired along with" should be used for those seasons, because there ''were'' crossovers between the shows, is that what you mean? Or because they were on the same network for those seasons? [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 13:09, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
11146 +++$+++ Tamfang +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11144 +++$+++ 11145 +++$+++ 2010-08-05 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.281055020E09 +++$+++ Because they were shown together and (I assume) marketed together. \u2014 +++$+++ :: Because they were shown together and (I assume) marketed together. —[[User:Tamfang|Tamfang]] ([[User talk:Tamfang|talk]]) 17:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
11147 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11144 +++$+++ 11146 +++$+++ 2010-08-05 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.281056040E09 +++$+++ Okay, well I changed it back to 'aired along with\" for ''Buffy'' seasons 4 and 5. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::Okay, well I changed it back to 'aired along with" for ''Buffy'' seasons 4 and 5. Thanks. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 17:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
11148 +++$+++ Xeworlebi +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11144 +++$+++ 11144 +++$+++ 2010-08-12 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.281661440E09 +++$+++ You removed the <code><nowiki><onlyinclude><\/nowiki><\/code> tags and the {{Tl|Episode list\/sublist}} template which are required for proper transclusion in {{Diff|Angel (season 4)|378567804|378564440|this edit}}. I have restored it.&nbsp;<span style=\"font-family: Palatino;\"> +++$+++ : You removed the <code><nowiki><onlyinclude></nowiki></code> tags and the {{Tl|Episode list/sublist}} template which are required for proper transclusion in {{Diff|Angel (season 4)|378567804|378564440|this edit}}. I have restored it.&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Palatino;">[[User:Xeworlebi|'''<big><big><sub>X</sub></big></big>'''eworlebi]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Xeworlebi|talk]])</sup></span> 18:04, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

89239 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89239 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-16 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.192603080E09 +++$+++ Hi Asiaticus - I notice that you've been marking a few articles with {{tl|China-geo-stub}}. That template's been deprecated - could you please use either {{tl|PRChina-geo-stub}} (for the mainland) or {{tl|Taiwan-geo-stub}} (for RoC)? Or better yet, simply use one of the province-level templates like {{tl|Hebei-geo-stub}}. It just saves a bit of re-stubbing later. Cheers.  +++$+++ Hi Asiaticus - I notice that you've been marking a few articles with {{tl|China-geo-stub}}. That template's been deprecated - could you please use either {{tl|PRChina-geo-stub}} (for the mainland) or {{tl|Taiwan-geo-stub}} (for RoC)? Or better yet, simply use one of the province-level templates like {{tl|Hebei-geo-stub}}. It just saves a bit of re-stubbing later. Cheers. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 23:38, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
89240 +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89239 +++$+++ 89239 +++$+++ 2007-10-17 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.192619160E09 +++$+++ Had no idea.  Fine will do.  +++$+++ :Had no idea.  Fine will do. [[User:Asiaticus|Asiaticus]] 04:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

11149 +++$+++ Deliriousandlost +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-27 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.285589580E09 +++$+++ We share a lot of the same editing area. I reverted two additions of italic titles that appeared in my watchlist. I only found out about this tonight but having read the discussion that started in the early summer on this i have found that the change in policy is with maybe 30% support. If you look at the discussion where the final tally was posted and the announcement in change of policy was made the numbers there even show no clear support for this. I commented afterward as it was closed by the time i found out about this. It took seeing a watchlist flooded by someone uncertain about whether to apply this or not for me to become aware of it. It doesn't help any that there are two different RfC (that i have found) on this from the last few months. One a majority nay and the other a 3-way split. I am not a big fan of ruling by consensus but i do know when i am not seeing it. I should also point out that so far as i know i am the lone voice on this. If you want to put the italics back in Wonderfalls and Vanished then fine. I figured i need register some protest edit to this sudden change in policy and i picked two of my older favourite Fox shows. Just happened to be you both times. <font face=\"Georgia\"> +++$+++ We share a lot of the same editing area. I reverted two additions of italic titles that appeared in my watchlist. I only found out about this tonight but having read the discussion that started in the early summer on this i have found that the change in policy is with maybe 30% support. If you look at the discussion where the final tally was posted and the announcement in change of policy was made the numbers there even show no clear support for this. I commented afterward as it was closed by the time i found out about this. It took seeing a watchlist flooded by someone uncertain about whether to apply this or not for me to become aware of it. It doesn't help any that there are two different RfC (that i have found) on this from the last few months. One a majority nay and the other a 3-way split. I am not a big fan of ruling by consensus but i do know when i am not seeing it. I should also point out that so far as i know i am the lone voice on this. If you want to put the italics back in Wonderfalls and Vanished then fine. I figured i need register some protest edit to this sudden change in policy and i picked two of my older favourite Fox shows. Just happened to be you both times. <font face="Georgia">[[User:Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">delirious</font>]] &amp; [[Special:Contributions/Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">lost</font>]] ☯ [[User Talk:Deliriousandlost|<sup><font color="purple">~hugs~</font></sup>]]</font> 05:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
11150 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11149 +++$+++ 11149 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.285618200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know, I guess I jumped the gun a little bit and got edit-happy. I'm just not going to make any further edits regarding the italic title template for now and wait and see what happens.  +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know, I guess I jumped the gun a little bit and got edit-happy. I'm just not going to make any further edits regarding the italic title template for now and wait and see what happens. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 13:10, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

11151 +++$+++ Gus Haynes +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11151 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-13 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.287009240E09 +++$+++ My mistake - sorry, didn't look at it properly before reverting. I feel such a fool.... +++$+++ My mistake - sorry, didn't look at it properly before reverting. I feel such a fool....[[User:Gus Haynes|Gus Haynes]] ([[User talk:Gus Haynes|talk]]) 15:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
11152 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11151 +++$+++ 11151 +++$+++ 2010-10-13 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.287009300E09 +++$+++ It's understandable.  +++$+++ :It's understandable. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 15:35, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

11153 +++$+++ Hearfourmewesique +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11153 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-10 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.289450520E09 +++$+++ \"Em dash is correct\" &ndash; please explain.  +++$+++ "Em dash is correct" &ndash; please explain. [[User:Hearfourmewesique|Hearfourmewesique]] ([[User talk:Hearfourmewesique|talk]]) 20:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
11154 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11153 +++$+++ 11153 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.289453040E09 +++$+++ Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Dashes|Manual of Style]] regarding dashes. In same paragraph in the ''Curb'' article, you can see the usage of the em dash.  +++$+++ :Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Dashes|Manual of Style]] regarding dashes. In same paragraph in the ''Curb'' article, you can see the usage of the em dash. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 21:24, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
11155 +++$+++ Hearfourmewesique +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11153 +++$+++ 11154 +++$+++ 2010-11-11 08:50:00 +++$+++ 1.289494200E09 +++$+++ Quote: ''\"Spaced en dashes \u2013 such as here \u2013 can replace unspaced em dashes in all of the ways discussed above. Several major publishers use spaced en dashes to the complete exclusion of em dashes. Use one style consistently throughout an article.\"'' There is only one em dash apart from the one in question, the rest (separating character names from their descriptions) are en dashes.  +++$+++ ::Quote: ''"Spaced en dashes – such as here – can replace unspaced em dashes in all of the ways discussed above. Several major publishers use spaced en dashes to the complete exclusion of em dashes. Use one style consistently throughout an article."'' There is only one em dash apart from the one in question, the rest (separating character names from their descriptions) are en dashes. [[User:Hearfourmewesique|Hearfourmewesique]] ([[User talk:Hearfourmewesique|talk]]) 08:50, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
11156 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11153 +++$+++ 11155 +++$+++ 2010-11-11 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.289513520E09 +++$+++ Okay, I have no problem either way. From what I've seen on here, em dashes are preferred when used during a sentence and en dashes are used for ranges and formatting such as what you mentioned about separating character names and descriptions. If you want to change it back to an en dash, go ahead, just make sure and change the other one.  +++$+++ :::Okay, I have no problem either way. From what I've seen on here, em dashes are preferred when used during a sentence and en dashes are used for ranges and formatting such as what you mentioned about separating character names and descriptions. If you want to change it back to an en dash, go ahead, just make sure and change the other one. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 14:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

535443 +++$+++ MarkThomas +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535443 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-31 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.167611580E09 +++$+++ Do you know some other policy that over-rides this? Thanks.  +++$+++ Do you know some other policy that over-rides this? Thanks. [[User:MarkThomas|MarkThomas]] 16:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
535444 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535443 +++$+++ 535443 +++$+++ 2006-12-31 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.167611880E09 +++$+++ <edit conflicted reply> Yes, as long as there is a disambiguation, you should be fine as I said on your talk page. Cheers,  +++$+++ :<edit conflicted reply> Yes, as long as there is a disambiguation, you should be fine as I said on your talk page. Cheers, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 16:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

11157 +++$+++ QuasyBoy +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-10 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.289453640E09 +++$+++ I was just about to wikilink [[Peter Lauer]] in the ''[[Dead Like Me]]'' episodes list, LOL. :) '''<font color=\"#FF0800\"> +++$+++ I was just about to wikilink [[Peter Lauer]] in the ''[[Dead Like Me]]'' episodes list, LOL. :) '''<font color="#FF0800">[[User:QuasyBoy|Quasy]]</font><font color="#014421">[[User talk:QuasyBoy|Boy]]</font>''' 21:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
11158 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11157 +++$+++ 11157 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.289454180E09 +++$+++ Haha, yeah I saw the addition to the ''Scrubs'' pages in my watchlist, so I went and looked at what other shows I've watched that he's directed, and ''DLM'' was the only one where there wasn't already a link. I'm fast, haha. :)  +++$+++ :Haha, yeah I saw the addition to the ''Scrubs'' pages in my watchlist, so I went and looked at what other shows I've watched that he's directed, and ''DLM'' was the only one where there wasn't already a link. I'm fast, haha. :) [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 21:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

273303 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-17 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.166424420E09 +++$+++ The comments made about me on this page by [[User:Jance]] have no evidence to substantiate them. They are a violation of [[WP:AGF]] and amount to [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]]. I corresponded with OFFICE over matters she has referred to and my actions were based on that correspondence. She needs also to study [[WP:BIO]].  +++$+++ The comments made about me on this page by [[User:Jance]] have no evidence to substantiate them. They are a violation of [[WP:AGF]] and amount to [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]]. I corresponded with OFFICE over matters she has referred to and my actions were based on that correspondence. She needs also to study [[WP:BIO]]. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 22:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
273304 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273303 +++$+++ 273303 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.166600520E09 +++$+++ I have studied WP:Bio, and I know that relevant primary sources that are court case decisions are allowed.  The evidence about OFFICE is the absence of evidence - which is what Sarah suggested.  I have asked to see a decision of WP:Office and there was none - except most recently, where it was stated that the admin (Tyrenius) was told that he should use his discretion to remove anything he believed was inappropriate.  Commenting on this is not WP:AGF or any other such nonsense.  I think the use of WP:TLA (three letter acronym) is sometimes used as a club.  I think that is inappropriate.  Thank you! +++$+++ :I have studied WP:Bio, and I know that relevant primary sources that are court case decisions are allowed.  The evidence about OFFICE is the absence of evidence - which is what Sarah suggested.  I have asked to see a decision of WP:Office and there was none - except most recently, where it was stated that the admin (Tyrenius) was told that he should use his discretion to remove anything he believed was inappropriate.  Commenting on this is not WP:AGF or any other such nonsense.  I think the use of WP:TLA (three letter acronym) is sometimes used as a club.  I think that is inappropriate.  Thank you![[User:Jance|Jance]] 23:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

535448 +++$+++ Utad3 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535448 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.167735060E09 +++$+++ I have seen now your message, I was not aware that it was not allowed; I apologize and thank you for you warning. I was trying to alert Administrators to abusive tagging by Wikipedia editors, who joined like a gang, which have been deleting for a long time good science articles at Wikipedia, and no one seems to care to stop them. Thanks -- +++$+++ I have seen now your message, I was not aware that it was not allowed; I apologize and thank you for you warning. I was trying to alert Administrators to abusive tagging by Wikipedia editors, who joined like a gang, which have been deleting for a long time good science articles at Wikipedia, and no one seems to care to stop them. Thanks --[[User:Utad3|Utad3]] 02:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
535449 +++$+++ Utad3 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535448 +++$+++ 535448 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.167739320E09 +++$+++ Btw, how can I contest the deletion \"prod\"? tag that was posted in the article [[Creation: The Physical Truth]]? There was another tag at the talk page of this article for speedy deletion, I wrote there may reasons to constested it but that tag was then removed. May you help please? -- +++$+++ :Btw, how can I contest the deletion "prod"? tag that was posted in the article [[Creation: The Physical Truth]]? There was another tag at the talk page of this article for speedy deletion, I wrote there may reasons to constested it but that tag was then removed. May you help please? --[[User:Utad3|Utad3]] 04:02, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
535450 +++$+++ Utad3 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535448 +++$+++ 535449 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.167740040E09 +++$+++ I think I've already found out how to contest that tag. Thanks anyway. -- +++$+++ ::I think I've already found out how to contest that tag. Thanks anyway. --[[User:Utad3|Utad3]] 04:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
535451 +++$+++ JeffGent +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535448 +++$+++ 535448 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.168221300E09 +++$+++ This same user [[User:Utad3|Utad3]] has spammed Wikipedia twice anonymously as 213.58.99.22 with links to copies of its articles on [[Creation: The Physical Truth]] and [[Harold Aspden]] at [http:\/\/peswiki.com\/index.php PowerPedia] - please see [[User talk:213.58.99.22]] and [[Special:Contributions\/213.58.99.22]] for details. --  +++$+++ :This same user [[User:Utad3|Utad3]] has spammed Wikipedia twice anonymously as 213.58.99.22 with links to copies of its articles on [[Creation: The Physical Truth]] and [[Harold Aspden]] at [http://peswiki.com/index.php PowerPedia] - please see [[User talk:213.58.99.22]] and [[Special:Contributions/213.58.99.22]] for details. -- [[User:JeffGent|Jeff G.]] 17:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

11161 +++$+++ Cartoon Boy +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Hello.  You seem to be a big fan of ''[[The Office (U.S. TV series)|The Office]]'', so I wanted to ask if you could help me with something.  Recently, the article for the character of [[Jan Levenson]] got changed from \"Levinson\" to \"Levenson\", as the latter is how [[NBC]] spells her name.  Many ''Office''-related articles that mention or link to the character's article still use \"Levinson\", causing a redirect.  I was wondering if you could help me in fixing those links and mentions to \"Levenson\".  Thanks.  -  +++$+++ Hello.  You seem to be a big fan of ''[[The Office (U.S. TV series)|The Office]]'', so I wanted to ask if you could help me with something.  Recently, the article for the character of [[Jan Levenson]] got changed from "Levinson" to "Levenson", as the latter is how [[NBC]] spells her name.  Many ''Office''-related articles that mention or link to the character's article still use "Levinson", causing a redirect.  I was wondering if you could help me in fixing those links and mentions to "Levenson".  Thanks.  - [[User:Cartoon Boy|Cartoon Boy]] ([[User talk:Cartoon Boy|talk]]) OO:13, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
11162 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11161 +++$+++ 11161 +++$+++ 2011-01-01 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.293922560E09 +++$+++ Sure, I'd be glad to help. Click [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Search&search=Jan%20Levinson&fulltext=Search&ns0=1&redirs=1 here] to see all the pages that have \"Jan Levinson\" in them, then just correct the ''Office'' related ones. I'll start fixing some of them now.  +++$+++ :Sure, I'd be glad to help. Click [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&search=Jan%20Levinson&fulltext=Search&ns0=1&redirs=1 here] to see all the pages that have "Jan Levinson" in them, then just correct the ''Office'' related ones. I'll start fixing some of them now. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 14:56, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

11163 +++$+++ QuasyBoy +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-10 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.294715880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the wikilinking of the pages I've been creating, I'm just on on a roll, today. :) Next is [[David Straiton]], and I'm calling it a day, LOL. '''<font color=\"#FF0800\"> +++$+++ Thanks for the wikilinking of the pages I've been creating, I'm just on on a roll, today. :) Next is [[David Straiton]], and I'm calling it a day, LOL. '''<font color="#FF0800">[[User:QuasyBoy|Quasy]]</font><font color="#014421">[[User talk:QuasyBoy|Boy]]</font>''' 19:18, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
11164 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11163 +++$+++ 11163 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.294716540E09 +++$+++ No problem, whenever I see new articles created for writers\/directors from you in my watchlist, I always rush to see what shows they've worked on that I've watched, then rush to add the links. Thanks to my slight OCD, haha. Keep up the good work. :)  +++$+++ :No problem, whenever I see new articles created for writers/directors from you in my watchlist, I always rush to see what shows they've worked on that I've watched, then rush to add the links. Thanks to my slight OCD, haha. Keep up the good work. :) [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 19:29, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
11165 +++$+++ QuasyBoy +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11163 +++$+++ 11164 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.294717380E09 +++$+++ Thanks, It's just been my thing lately especially if a director has a A LOT of credits for A LOT of popular shows and no one bothers to create stubs for them. The [[David Straiton]] page is up now, go wild! :) '''<font color=\"#FF0800\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks, It's just been my thing lately especially if a director has a A LOT of credits for A LOT of popular shows and no one bothers to create stubs for them. The [[David Straiton]] page is up now, go wild! :) '''<font color="#FF0800">[[User:QuasyBoy|Quasy]]</font><font color="#014421">[[User talk:QuasyBoy|Boy]]</font>''' 19:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
11166 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11163 +++$+++ 11165 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.294717740E09 +++$+++ I pre-linked some David Straiton links after I replied to stay ahead of the curve as I'm on my way out. I'll keep my eye out for any new creations in the future. Later.  +++$+++ :::I pre-linked some David Straiton links after I replied to stay ahead of the curve as I'm on my way out. I'll keep my eye out for any new creations in the future. Later. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 19:49, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

273308 +++$+++ Daniel.Bryant +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-19 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.166599740E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/65.95.150.180] maybe could do with a block similar to the other block-evading IP's. ''' +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/65.95.150.180] maybe could do with a block similar to the other block-evading IP's. '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|Daniel.Bryant]] <sup>[&nbsp;[[User talk:Daniel.Bryant|T]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Daniel.Bryant|C]]&nbsp;]</sup>''' 23:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
273309 +++$+++ Daniel.Bryant +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273308 +++$+++ 273308 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.166602500E09 +++$+++ After the latest bit of lovely trolling at ANI, I think that rangeblock, if you can get it to work, is appropriate. ''' +++$+++ :After the latest bit of lovely trolling at ANI, I think that rangeblock, if you can get it to work, is appropriate. '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|Daniel.Bryant]] <sup>[&nbsp;[[User talk:Daniel.Bryant|T]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Daniel.Bryant|C]]&nbsp;]</sup>''' 00:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

525559 +++$+++ Una Smith +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-21 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.195712160E09 +++$+++ Arcadian, could you fix [[Template:Pervasive_developmental_disorders]] for me?  It makes a bunch of Mainspace pages appear in the medical navboxes category.  I don't know what the proper syntax is, nor how long updates take to propagate, so maybe I fixed and maybe I didn't... -- +++$+++ Arcadian, could you fix [[Template:Pervasive_developmental_disorders]] for me?  It makes a bunch of Mainspace pages appear in the medical navboxes category.  I don't know what the proper syntax is, nor how long updates take to propagate, so maybe I fixed and maybe I didn't... --[[User:Una Smith|Una Smith]] ([[User talk:Una Smith|talk]]) 22:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
525560 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525559 +++$+++ 525559 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.195712700E09 +++$+++ I think [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3APervasive_developmental_disorders&diff=172991098&oldid=170777029 you got it right] - but it depends upon the goal. Did you want \"Category:Autism\" to appear in all the pages listed on the template, or just for the template itself? -- +++$+++ :I think [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3APervasive_developmental_disorders&diff=172991098&oldid=170777029 you got it right] - but it depends upon the goal. Did you want "Category:Autism" to appear in all the pages listed on the template, or just for the template itself? --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian|talk]]) 22:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
525561 +++$+++ Una Smith +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525559 +++$+++ 525559 +++$+++ 2007-11-22 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.195728540E09 +++$+++ Neither.  The problem is that pages including this template are being included on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Medical_navigational_boxes Category:Medical_navigational_boxes].  I don't see why ... maybe the problem is on yet another page. -- +++$+++ :Neither.  The problem is that pages including this template are being included on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Medical_navigational_boxes Category:Medical_navigational_boxes].  I don't see why ... maybe the problem is on yet another page. --[[User:Una Smith|Una Smith]] ([[User talk:Una Smith|talk]]) 02:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

273310 +++$+++ SunStar Net +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-20 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.166607420E09 +++$+++ You've done well dealing with it so far.... keep the good work up! -- +++$+++ You've done well dealing with it so far.... keep the good work up! --[[User:SunStar Net|SunStar Net]]<sup>[[User talk:SunStar Net|talk]]</sup> 01:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
273311 +++$+++ Daniel.Bryant +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273310 +++$+++ 273310 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.166625000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the block on Neutralizer - I was just getting someone in #-admins. He was Ottawaman, as you thought :) Do you want to rollback his edits to Essjay's talk page, or just leave them? ''' +++$+++ :Thanks for the block on Neutralizer - I was just getting someone in #-admins. He was Ottawaman, as you thought :) Do you want to rollback his edits to Essjay's talk page, or just leave them? '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|Daniel.Bryant]] <sup>[&nbsp;[[User talk:Daniel.Bryant|T]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Daniel.Bryant|C]]&nbsp;]</sup>''' 06:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
273312 +++$+++ Daniel.Bryant +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273310 +++$+++ 273311 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.166627400E09 +++$+++ Two userpages need to be blanked and replaced with <nowiki>{{sockpuppetproven|Neutralizer|[[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Ottawaman]] and [[Special:Contributions\/{{subst:PAGENAME}}|their edits]]}}<\/nowiki> - [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Gomapleleafsgo] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:BobTrout5th]. Also, it may not be a bad idea to protect Neutralizer's talk page, as well. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ ::Two userpages need to be blanked and replaced with <nowiki>{{sockpuppetproven|Neutralizer|[[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ottawaman]] and [[Special:Contributions/{{subst:PAGENAME}}|their edits]]}}</nowiki> - [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gomapleleafsgo] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BobTrout5th]. Also, it may not be a bad idea to protect Neutralizer's talk page, as well. Cheers, '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|Daniel.Bryant]] <sup>[&nbsp;[[User talk:Daniel.Bryant|T]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Daniel.Bryant|C]]&nbsp;]</sup>''' 07:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
273313 +++$+++ Luna Santin +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273310 +++$+++ 273312 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.166646780E09 +++$+++ You seem to have adminprotected your user talk on accident?  +++$+++ :::You seem to have adminprotected your user talk on accident? [[User:Luna Santin|Luna Santin]] 12:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

11168 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-13 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.297593060E09 +++$+++ I don't mean to be a pain, but having multiple folks trying to help do this at the same time makes it impossible to know what has been done and what hasn't.  I promise you I'll finish the job, though it may take hours.  +++$+++ I don't mean to be a pain, but having multiple folks trying to help do this at the same time makes it impossible to know what has been done and what hasn't.  I promise you I'll finish the job, though it may take hours. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 02:31, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
11169 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11168 +++$+++ 11168 +++$+++ 2011-02-13 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.297593780E09 +++$+++ Okay, sure, no big deal. Was going to help out with the re-categorization for the shows I watch, but I'll leave it for now. Have fun!  +++$+++ :Okay, sure, no big deal. Was going to help out with the re-categorization for the shows I watch, but I'll leave it for now. Have fun! [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 02:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

535457 +++$+++ Lethaniol +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-05 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.168025760E09 +++$+++ Just some ideas - Cheers  +++$+++ Just some ideas - Cheers [[User talk:Lethaniol|Lethaniol]] 11:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
535458 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535457 +++$+++ 535457 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.168066740E09 +++$+++ That sounds sensible. I will put some words together as soon as I get back to England.  +++$+++ :That sounds sensible. I will put some words together as soon as I get back to England. [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 22:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

11170 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-28 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.298899560E09 +++$+++ These guys wanting that link to the leaked script on the page don't seem to be going away. You think a request for semi-protection is warranted yet?  +++$+++ These guys wanting that link to the leaked script on the page don't seem to be going away. You think a request for semi-protection is warranted yet? [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08|talk]]) 05:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
11171 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11170 +++$+++ 11170 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.298929980E09 +++$+++ Sounds like a good idea since it's been going on since the 25th and I don't see it stopping anytime soon. Man, it's been annoying.  +++$+++ :Sounds like a good idea since it's been going on since the 25th and I don't see it stopping anytime soon. Man, it's been annoying. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 13:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
11172 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11170 +++$+++ 11171 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.299153180E09 +++$+++ Well it looked as though it had stopped, certainly tapered off for a few days but now some bloody wanker has started adding it again. I don't suppose you know how to get a page protected, I've never had to do it before?  +++$+++ ::Well it looked as though it had stopped, certainly tapered off for a few days but now some bloody wanker has started adding it again. I don't suppose you know how to get a page protected, I've never had to do it before? [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08|talk]]) 03:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
11173 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11170 +++$+++ 11172 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.299193440E09 +++$+++ Okay, I just requested it for [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Goodbye, Michael|semi-protection]].  +++$+++ :::Okay, I just requested it for [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Goodbye, Michael|semi-protection]]. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 15:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
11174 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11170 +++$+++ 11172 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.299212940E09 +++$+++ Great, so it was protected after an IP undid your edit...  +++$+++ :::Great, so it was protected after an IP undid your edit... [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 20:29, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
11175 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11170 +++$+++ 11174 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.299221880E09 +++$+++ Well I guess that's a start at least, but the problem will be convincing others that the content doesn't belong on the page. All these anonymous editors don't seem willing to acknowledge the fact that the script is a total fake. I don't see how we're going to be able to reach a consensus with a bunch of unregistered users, or one unregistered user using multiple IP addresses.  +++$+++ ::::Well I guess that's a start at least, but the problem will be convincing others that the content doesn't belong on the page. All these anonymous editors don't seem willing to acknowledge the fact that the script is a total fake. I don't see how we're going to be able to reach a consensus with a bunch of unregistered users, or one unregistered user using multiple IP addresses. [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08|talk]]) 22:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
11176 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11170 +++$+++ 11170 +++$+++ 2011-03-06 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.299483180E09 +++$+++ Please contribute to the discussion at [[Talk:Goodbye, Michael]] instead, as I'm not the only one involved with this. Thank you. \u2014 +++$+++ :Please contribute to the discussion at [[Talk:Goodbye, Michael]] instead, as I'm not the only one involved with this. Thank you. —[[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 23:33, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

535459 +++$+++ 89.172.207.60 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-05 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.168062660E09 +++$+++ [[User:Aldux]] seems to be abusing his moderator powers to push his POV and that of his Italian pals. Check his contributions [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Aldux] at [[Francesco Patrizi]], [[Giovanni Luppis]], [[Andrea Meldolla]], [[Benedetto Cotrugli]], [[Nenad Bjelica]], [[Osijek]]. He is removing valid upgrades and content to a lesser correct and highly POV versions. The first four are identical disputes as in [[Giulio Clovio]] and [[Giorgio Orsini]] articles so the policy introduced there should be applied on these articles too. -- +++$+++ [[User:Aldux]] seems to be abusing his moderator powers to push his POV and that of his Italian pals. Check his contributions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Aldux] at [[Francesco Patrizi]], [[Giovanni Luppis]], [[Andrea Meldolla]], [[Benedetto Cotrugli]], [[Nenad Bjelica]], [[Osijek]]. He is removing valid upgrades and content to a lesser correct and highly POV versions. The first four are identical disputes as in [[Giulio Clovio]] and [[Giorgio Orsini]] articles so the policy introduced there should be applied on these articles too. --[[User:89.172.207.60|89.172.207.60]] 21:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
535460 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535459 +++$+++ 535459 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.168066680E09 +++$+++ Apologies but I am not familiar with any of these historical figures (aside Bjelica because I'm a Real Betis supporter). In all honesty, it looks as a content dispute and Aldux has not used any special admin buttons. Any editor can revert an edit if they think it is not verifiable. All I can say is that you could place a [[WP:RFC|request for comments]] for uninvolved editors to express their views. Regards,  +++$+++ :Apologies but I am not familiar with any of these historical figures (aside Bjelica because I'm a Real Betis supporter). In all honesty, it looks as a content dispute and Aldux has not used any special admin buttons. Any editor can revert an edit if they think it is not verifiable. All I can say is that you could place a [[WP:RFC|request for comments]] for uninvolved editors to express their views. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 22:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
535461 +++$+++ 89.172.201.74 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535459 +++$+++ 535460 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 06:23:00 +++$+++ 1.168093380E09 +++$+++ Heh well the problem is I don't really know how to do that, even with the explnation it seems extremely complicated to me. The point is that this is really a minor problem. The person in question (Aldux) seems to removing valid content such as the names in Croatian for those people and cat's connected with them and even corrections to the link. For example in [[Giovanni Luppis]] he keeps reverting [[Austro-Hungarian Navy]] to non-existant [[Austrian Navy]] and putting construction 'Italian Officer' when the man was born, lived and died in Austria-Hungary so he could have been only Austro-Hungarian officer (that he was an ethnic Italian no one disputes). In Francesco Patrizi article he again removes his name in Croatia and Croatian cat while putting cat \"Italians from Yugoslavia\"?! The man was born in 16th century there was no Yugoslavia, same for Italy, he was Venetian (Republic of Venice) and if this designation is good for [[Marco Polo]] it's good for Patrizi as well. The same goes for Meldolla and Cotrugli. And Nenad Bjelica as a Serb is totally unreferenced, there is absolutly no proof or source given to this claim. Please mediate! -- +++$+++ ::Heh well the problem is I don't really know how to do that, even with the explnation it seems extremely complicated to me. The point is that this is really a minor problem. The person in question (Aldux) seems to removing valid content such as the names in Croatian for those people and cat's connected with them and even corrections to the link. For example in [[Giovanni Luppis]] he keeps reverting [[Austro-Hungarian Navy]] to non-existant [[Austrian Navy]] and putting construction 'Italian Officer' when the man was born, lived and died in Austria-Hungary so he could have been only Austro-Hungarian officer (that he was an ethnic Italian no one disputes). In Francesco Patrizi article he again removes his name in Croatia and Croatian cat while putting cat "Italians from Yugoslavia"?! The man was born in 16th century there was no Yugoslavia, same for Italy, he was Venetian (Republic of Venice) and if this designation is good for [[Marco Polo]] it's good for Patrizi as well. The same goes for Meldolla and Cotrugli. And Nenad Bjelica as a Serb is totally unreferenced, there is absolutly no proof or source given to this claim. Please mediate! --[[User:89.172.201.74|89.172.201.74]] 06:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
535462 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535459 +++$+++ 535461 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.168220040E09 +++$+++ Hi Asterion. Actually, I don't see it as a content dispute, I mean on my part; there is obviously a content dispute among editors, but this doesn't involve me, as I'm agnostic regarding the nationalities of these guys, and really don't care much. To be clearer, if a legitimate editor inserted the same content I would have no reason to rollback, as I'm only interested here in preventing {{user|Afrika paprika}} from attempting to evade his ban, and blocking his new socks. All the content Afrika\/Factanista is speaking of regards edits made by others, and not by me; as far as I remember, I only copyedited Andrea Meldolla, that had been written in a very bad English. You may have noted that all the articles in question are semiprotected; this was because of Afrika's sockpuppeterring, that forced me to raise a chain of sp articles to make his activities more difficult. To circumvent this, he created {{user|Praskaton}}, that, strangely, edited only the article that are sp because of Afrika, and restored Afrika\/Factanista's previous edits. And a last note: the IP that sent this complaint is in the range of Afrika's ip accounts, see [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser\/Case\/Afrika paprika]]. Ciao,-- +++$+++ :::Hi Asterion. Actually, I don't see it as a content dispute, I mean on my part; there is obviously a content dispute among editors, but this doesn't involve me, as I'm agnostic regarding the nationalities of these guys, and really don't care much. To be clearer, if a legitimate editor inserted the same content I would have no reason to rollback, as I'm only interested here in preventing {{user|Afrika paprika}} from attempting to evade his ban, and blocking his new socks. All the content Afrika/Factanista is speaking of regards edits made by others, and not by me; as far as I remember, I only copyedited Andrea Meldolla, that had been written in a very bad English. You may have noted that all the articles in question are semiprotected; this was because of Afrika's sockpuppeterring, that forced me to raise a chain of sp articles to make his activities more difficult. To circumvent this, he created {{user|Praskaton}}, that, strangely, edited only the article that are sp because of Afrika, and restored Afrika/Factanista's previous edits. And a last note: the IP that sent this complaint is in the range of Afrika's ip accounts, see [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Afrika paprika]]. Ciao,--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 17:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

273316 +++$+++ SunStar Net +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273316 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-20 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.166644440E09 +++$+++ I've set up a new page at [[User:SunStar Net\/Ottawaman]]. Feel free to use this as you want. Hope this helps! -- +++$+++ I've set up a new page at [[User:SunStar Net/Ottawaman]]. Feel free to use this as you want. Hope this helps! --[[User:SunStar Net|SunStar Net]]<sup>[[User talk:SunStar Net|talk]]</sup> 11:54, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
273317 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273316 +++$+++ 273316 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.166681880E09 +++$+++ I also changed my mind about reversion of the G. Patrick Maxwell article.  Most of what DrOliver had written was either unsourced with links that did not work, or commercial links (old marketing catalog of a company with whom this guy had a contract.).   If you disagree, please let me know.  I read the Wiki guidelines, and they say that such deletion is permitted at any time, although it cautioned to give the author time to find a source.   Dr.Oliver has had months but has provided no additional sources.   However, nobody else has seemed to care enough to outlast DrOliver's reversions.  How can someone be said to be \"known for\" something with no consensus, and with the only source being an old marketing catalog?  (Maxwell & this company had contracts, also).  Thank you.  I do have a problem with Dr. Oliver's writing, most of which is (1) badly written and (2) POV and (3) poorly sourced or misquoted.  Thank you.  I do expect Dr.Oliver to promptly revert this, without correcting any sources. +++$+++ :I also changed my mind about reversion of the G. Patrick Maxwell article.  Most of what DrOliver had written was either unsourced with links that did not work, or commercial links (old marketing catalog of a company with whom this guy had a contract.).   If you disagree, please let me know.  I read the Wiki guidelines, and they say that such deletion is permitted at any time, although it cautioned to give the author time to find a source.   Dr.Oliver has had months but has provided no additional sources.   However, nobody else has seemed to care enough to outlast DrOliver's reversions.  How can someone be said to be "known for" something with no consensus, and with the only source being an old marketing catalog?  (Maxwell & this company had contracts, also).  Thank you.  I do have a problem with Dr. Oliver's writing, most of which is (1) badly written and (2) POV and (3) poorly sourced or misquoted.  Thank you.  I do expect Dr.Oliver to promptly revert this, without correcting any sources.[[User:Jance|Jance]] 22:18, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

273318 +++$+++ Physicq210 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-20 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.166675640E09 +++$+++ I have formally inplemented the community ban on the above user(s?). I also added an entry on [[WP:BU]] under the heading \"Neutralizer.\" Feel free to fix up the entry as needed, as I only know the ending part of the saga. Thanks! --<sup>[[User talk:Physicq210|<font color=\"000000\">210<\/font>]]<\/sup>''' +++$+++ I have formally inplemented the community ban on the above user(s?). I also added an entry on [[WP:BU]] under the heading "Neutralizer." Feel free to fix up the entry as needed, as I only know the ending part of the saga. Thanks! --<sup>[[User talk:Physicq210|<font color="000000">210</font>]]</sup>'''[[User:Physicq210|<font color="#0000C0" face="Comic Sans MS">physicq</font>]]''' (''[[Special:Contributions/Physicq210|<font color="#0000C0">c</font>]]'') 20:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
273319 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273318 +++$+++ 273318 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.166676240E09 +++$+++ Canuckster's latest and hopefully last sock claims that he's finished so hopefully that is the case. Please realize this isn't typical North American behavior. :) Regards,  +++$+++ :Canuckster's latest and hopefully last sock claims that he's finished so hopefully that is the case. Please realize this isn't typical North American behavior. :) Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 20:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
273320 +++$+++ Physicq210 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273318 +++$+++ 273319 +++$+++ 2006-12-21 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.166760540E09 +++$+++ I have closed Ottawaman's suspected sock page, and is now in the archives. --<sup>[[User talk:Physicq210|<font color=\"000000\">210<\/font>]]<\/sup>''' +++$+++ ::I have closed Ottawaman's suspected sock page, and is now in the archives. --<sup>[[User talk:Physicq210|<font color="000000">210</font>]]</sup>'''[[User:Physicq210|<font color="#0000C0" face="Comic Sans MS">physicq</font>]]''' (''[[Special:Contributions/Physicq210|<font color="#0000C0">c</font>]]'') 20:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
273321 +++$+++ Finnegans wake +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273318 +++$+++ 273320 +++$+++ 2006-12-22 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.166782260E09 +++$+++ No problem at all re: my comment on WP:ANI. It's the least I could do. You endured a lot of personal attacks and harassment for being willing to stick your neck out for the community. I do hope this \"agreement\" holds, but this guy was so persistent and ideological that I suspect he might just lay low for awhile before reappearing; but let's keep our fingers crossed in any case. -  +++$+++ ::: No problem at all re: my comment on WP:ANI. It's the least I could do. You endured a lot of personal attacks and harassment for being willing to stick your neck out for the community. I do hope this "agreement" holds, but this guy was so persistent and ideological that I suspect he might just lay low for awhile before reappearing; but let's keep our fingers crossed in any case. - [[User:Finnegans wake|Finnegans wake]] 02:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

535464 +++$+++ Psantora +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.168110360E09 +++$+++ Hi. I happened across some of LibearyGay's edits and I think Rainbowangie is just trying to revert some of their overzealous changes.  I'm not really sure why Rainbowangie was blocked, but if you take a look at Libeary's edit history you will see they are going around adding speedy deletion templates all over the wiki for petty reasons on articles that if they were to be deleted should probably be taken to AfD. I'm not really familiar with wiki-stalking, but I think Rainbowangie's behavior is justified. Anyway, I'd appreciate another head being involved with the situation. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. I happened across some of LibearyGay's edits and I think Rainbowangie is just trying to revert some of their overzealous changes.  I'm not really sure why Rainbowangie was blocked, but if you take a look at Libeary's edit history you will see they are going around adding speedy deletion templates all over the wiki for petty reasons on articles that if they were to be deleted should probably be taken to AfD. I'm not really familiar with wiki-stalking, but I think Rainbowangie's behavior is justified. Anyway, I'd appreciate another head being involved with the situation. Thanks. [[User:Psantora|Paul]]<small><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Psantora|C]]</sup>/<sub>[[User talk:Psantora|T]][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&amp;action=edit&amp;section=new +]</sub></small> 11:06, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
535465 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535464 +++$+++ 535464 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.168110660E09 +++$+++ OK, I will have a look.  +++$+++ :OK, I will have a look. [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 11:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
535466 +++$+++ Psantora +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535464 +++$+++ 535465 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.168112820E09 +++$+++ I agree with what you were saying about the single purpose account thing.  I thought it was odd that two new users would have such an intricate knowledge of templates and stuff.  I do have a comment about the speedy delete template.  \"If this page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with this page\u2019s proposed speedy deletion, please add:\" Rainbowangie was cited for removing the speedy delete template, but as evidenced by their edit history, did not create the article.  What is the procedure behind removing inappropriate speedy delete templates?  Should that wording be changed that only administrators should remove the template?  Just curious what you thought.  Thanks for helping to get this straightened out.   +++$+++ ::I agree with what you were saying about the single purpose account thing.  I thought it was odd that two new users would have such an intricate knowledge of templates and stuff.  I do have a comment about the speedy delete template.  "If this page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with this page’s proposed speedy deletion, please add:" Rainbowangie was cited for removing the speedy delete template, but as evidenced by their edit history, did not create the article.  What is the procedure behind removing inappropriate speedy delete templates?  Should that wording be changed that only administrators should remove the template?  Just curious what you thought.  Thanks for helping to get this straightened out.  [[User:Psantora|Paul]]<small><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Psantora|C]]</sup>/<sub>[[User talk:Psantora|T]][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&amp;action=edit&amp;section=new +]</sub></small> 11:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
535467 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535464 +++$+++ 535466 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.168113360E09 +++$+++ That is a good question but I do not have the answer myself either. Personally if someone edit war over adding\/removing tags, I would say it is disruption ''per se''. However I agree that it needs further clarification indeed.  +++$+++ :::That is a good question but I do not have the answer myself either. Personally if someone edit war over adding/removing tags, I would say it is disruption ''per se''. However I agree that it needs further clarification indeed. [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 11:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

11177 +++$+++ Cop 663 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-04 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.299234780E09 +++$+++ Sorry to bug you again, but I'd like to ask some advice. I was looking at the article [[Pilot (Twin Peaks)]], which begins with the words '\"Pilot\" (also known as \"Northwest Passage\") is the premiere episode of the mystery television series Twin Peaks...\"'. This seems odd, since (as per our previous conversation), the episode isn't ''called'' \"Pilot\", but rather ''is'' the pilot. Before I start mucking about with the wording, I just thought I'd ask if you know a good reason why it may be written this way, since you seem to know a lot about the episodes and their titling. Any advice would be gratefully received!  +++$+++ Sorry to bug you again, but I'd like to ask some advice. I was looking at the article [[Pilot (Twin Peaks)]], which begins with the words '"Pilot" (also known as "Northwest Passage") is the premiere episode of the mystery television series Twin Peaks..."'. This seems odd, since (as per our previous conversation), the episode isn't ''called'' "Pilot", but rather ''is'' the pilot. Before I start mucking about with the wording, I just thought I'd ask if you know a good reason why it may be written this way, since you seem to know a lot about the episodes and their titling. Any advice would be gratefully received! [[User:Cop 663|Cop 663]] ([[User talk:Cop 663|talk]]) 02:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
11178 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11177 +++$+++ 11177 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.299278460E09 +++$+++ Well, the episode is both a pilot and titled \"Pilot\", like many other television shows' pilots. I doubt any controversy would arise if you changed the wording a little, to something like \"The pilot episode, also known as \"Northwest Passage\", of the mystery television series Twin Peaks...\". Some articles use that wording, so I doubt any changes would cause any problems (it's also not a high-traffic article). Good luck! \u2014 +++$+++ :Well, the episode is both a pilot and titled "Pilot", like many other television shows' pilots. I doubt any controversy would arise if you changed the wording a little, to something like "The pilot episode, also known as "Northwest Passage", of the mystery television series Twin Peaks...". Some articles use that wording, so I doubt any changes would cause any problems (it's also not a high-traffic article). Good luck! —[[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 14:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

11179 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.300430460E09 +++$+++ Hello :). Just letting you know, the website for UK ratings you need to put in the date, and the channel (unless you wanna look through every channel) and you'll see the information. Put April, 2010 and then the second date option. It's the one show on \"Syfy\" for all the weeks it was on and the first week all their showing combined were seen by 1.56 million.  +++$+++ Hello :). Just letting you know, the website for UK ratings you need to put in the date, and the channel (unless you wanna look through every channel) and you'll see the information. Put April, 2010 and then the second date option. It's the one show on "Syfy" for all the weeks it was on and the first week all their showing combined were seen by 1.56 million. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 23:41, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
11180 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11179 +++$+++ 11179 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.300434300E09 +++$+++ The reference is a little confusing, as you have to do a bit of work to actually get the information, plus you also have to add up the various numbers to get the 1.5 million. Also, there's no indication of what episode actually aired (it just says \"V SEASON 1\"), or if it was multiple repeats of the pilot or the first few episodes of the season. It's more more common to simply state how many viewers it received when it originally aired, and it got 292,000 ([http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/media\/2010\/apr\/14\/panorama-tv-ratings source]). At the very least, that reference should be used stating the original viewership. Then include that with multiple airings throughout the week it reached 1.5 million. The BARB ref needs to be clarified though, including the date where the figures can be found, it also mistakenly says Sky1 not Syfy.  +++$+++ :The reference is a little confusing, as you have to do a bit of work to actually get the information, plus you also have to add up the various numbers to get the 1.5 million. Also, there's no indication of what episode actually aired (it just says "V SEASON 1"), or if it was multiple repeats of the pilot or the first few episodes of the season. It's more more common to simply state how many viewers it received when it originally aired, and it got 292,000 ([http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/apr/14/panorama-tv-ratings source]). At the very least, that reference should be used stating the original viewership. Then include that with multiple airings throughout the week it reached 1.5 million. The BARB ref needs to be clarified though, including the date where the figures can be found, it also mistakenly says Sky1 not Syfy. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 00:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
11181 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11179 +++$+++ 11180 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.300483800E09 +++$+++ I know, I will change the Sky1 thing now. Also, The Guardian state they're using ratings from \"BARB\" however the viewing figures from there says 481,000. Either way, we have to use the primary source which is, BARB. They're 100% all the first episode, as the second episode didn't premiere until the following week. You're correct, though, we should just use the original airing. I will make all the changes now.  +++$+++ ::I know, I will change the Sky1 thing now. Also, The Guardian state they're using ratings from "BARB" however the viewing figures from there says 481,000. Either way, we have to use the primary source which is, BARB. They're 100% all the first episode, as the second episode didn't premiere until the following week. You're correct, though, we should just use the original airing. I will make all the changes now. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 14:30, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
11182 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11179 +++$+++ 11181 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.300486020E09 +++$+++ Okay, it's fine now. Though I did make some minor wording changes, corrected \"it's\" to \"its\", and used consistent date formatting.  +++$+++ :::Okay, it's fine now. Though I did make some minor wording changes, corrected "it's" to "its", and used consistent date formatting. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 15:07, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
11183 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11179 +++$+++ 11182 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.300501800E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Also, I think the guardians article saying \"premiere\" meant a new episode. For some reason, here in the UK, Syfy says \"A UK premiere\" for every episode.  +++$+++ ::::Thank you. Also, I think the guardians article saying "premiere" meant a new episode. For some reason, here in the UK, Syfy says "A UK premiere" for every episode. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 19:30, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

569842 +++$+++ Eaomatrix +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569842 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-30 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.177981500E09 +++$+++ Hello, as an admin will you do me a favour and indef block my bot account [[User:EMBot]], until I rewrite the programming and properly build it, so it can't cause any harm in the mean time. Please remember to disable the autoblocker.  +++$+++ Hello, as an admin will you do me a favour and indef block my bot account [[User:EMBot]], until I rewrite the programming and properly build it, so it can't cause any harm in the mean time. Please remember to disable the autoblocker. [[User:Eaomatrix|Eaomatrix]] 18:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
569843 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569842 +++$+++ 569842 +++$+++ 2007-04-30 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.177981620E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&user=&page=User:EMBot Done].  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&user=&page=User:EMBot Done]. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 18:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

535470 +++$+++ ThuranX +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-09 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.168409580E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Not only is he NOT me, I've already reverted his bizarre little freakout essay. Thanks for being on the watch, I've already reported him to the admin who blocked his other IP.  +++$+++ Thanks. Not only is he NOT me, I've already reverted his bizarre little freakout essay. Thanks for being on the watch, I've already reported him to the admin who blocked his other IP. [[User:ThuranX|ThuranX]] 22:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
535471 +++$+++ ThuranX +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535470 +++$+++ 535470 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.168410120E09 +++$+++ It appears you've already beat me to the revert, and we edit conflicted... but i didnt' get the EdCon notice... anyways, he's gone way over 3RR on the Heroes page, pretending to be an NBC lawyer. We definitely need admin intervention. Cna you step in, or should I go to AIV? thank you.  +++$+++ :It appears you've already beat me to the revert, and we edit conflicted... but i didnt' get the EdCon notice... anyways, he's gone way over 3RR on the Heroes page, pretending to be an NBC lawyer. We definitely need admin intervention. Cna you step in, or should I go to AIV? thank you. [[User:ThuranX|ThuranX]] 22:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
535472 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535470 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.168411380E09 +++$+++ That one has been blocked too (by [[User:Wknight94]]).  +++$+++ :::That one has been blocked too (by [[User:Wknight94]]). [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 22:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
535473 +++$+++ ThuranX +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535470 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.168413180E09 +++$+++ [[User:68.91.212.118]]. Again.  +++$+++ ::::[[User:68.91.212.118]]. Again. [[User:ThuranX|ThuranX]] 23:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
535474 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535470 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.168414560E09 +++$+++ Given the heavy vandalism from multiple sources, I had to protect the article too.  +++$+++ :::::Given the heavy vandalism from multiple sources, I had to protect the article too. [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 23:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
535475 +++$+++ ThuranX +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535470 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.168520100E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Abusive_IP_Vandal] see there, he's at it again, same 'ace ass shadow' and 'thugs' comments. definitely the same, despite the religio-philosophic rhethoric he's cut n pasting around. (also posted to Wknight94.)  +++$+++ ::::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Abusive_IP_Vandal] see there, he's at it again, same 'ace ass shadow' and 'thugs' comments. definitely the same, despite the religio-philosophic rhethoric he's cut n pasting around. (also posted to Wknight94.) [[User:ThuranX|ThuranX]] 04:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

89245 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-22 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.198392420E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 22:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
89246 +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89245 +++$+++ 89245 +++$+++ 2007-12-22 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.198392600E09 +++$+++ I am correcting the link to reflect the current name of the location. +++$+++ :I am correcting the link to reflect the current name of the location.[[User:Asiaticus|Asiaticus]] ([[User talk:Asiaticus#top|talk]]) 22:50, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

11184 +++$+++ Dlabtot +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-21 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.300711620E09 +++$+++ Thank you for formatting my reference.  +++$+++ Thank you for formatting my reference. [[User:Dlabtot|Dlabtot]] ([[User talk:Dlabtot|talk]]) 05:47, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
11185 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11184 +++$+++ 11184 +++$+++ 2011-03-21 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.300738080E09 +++$+++ No problem. I figured one of the commentary tracks could be used as a reference, I just couldn't remember which one where they discusses that (there are 28 of them! Haha). Thanks for getting a reference in there.  +++$+++ :No problem. I figured one of the commentary tracks could be used as a reference, I just couldn't remember which one where they discusses that (there are 28 of them! Haha). Thanks for getting a reference in there. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 13:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

11186 +++$+++ Heywoodg +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-02 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.301794800E09 +++$+++ I had an edit undone because it should be \"original channel only\"? Is that wiki policy or the done thing? I thought it would be nice for those in the UK to know it was actually available over here (I didn't know until I made the change). If so, fair enough, but just thought I would ask for clarification! Cheers  +++$+++ I had an edit undone because it should be "original channel only"? Is that wiki policy or the done thing? I thought it would be nice for those in the UK to know it was actually available over here (I didn't know until I made the change). If so, fair enough, but just thought I would ask for clarification! Cheers [[User:Heywoodg|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:red; text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; letter-spacing: 1px; padding: 3px 6px;"> <i>Heywoodg</i></span>]] 18:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
11187 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11186 +++$+++ 11186 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.301797020E09 +++$+++ For the lead, it's usually more common to simply list the original channel and its country of origin. Because once you list another country\/channel, it'll probably encourage others to list more, bloating the lead. Listing international broadcasters is fine, but usually that goes into a \"International broadcast\" section, but the ''Breaking Bad'' article does not have one. Feel free to create a section for that, adding in the UK information, which is notable, but remember to include a reference for it as well.  +++$+++ :For the lead, it's usually more common to simply list the original channel and its country of origin. Because once you list another country/channel, it'll probably encourage others to list more, bloating the lead. Listing international broadcasters is fine, but usually that goes into a "International broadcast" section, but the ''Breaking Bad'' article does not have one. Feel free to create a section for that, adding in the UK information, which is notable, but remember to include a reference for it as well. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 19:17, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
11188 +++$+++ Heywoodg +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11186 +++$+++ 11187 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.301864520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the explanation (which sounds logical enough) and suggestion! Cheers  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the explanation (which sounds logical enough) and suggestion! Cheers [[User:Heywoodg|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:red; text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; letter-spacing: 1px; padding: 3px 6px;"> <i>Heywoodg</i></span>]] 14:02, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

273332 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-23 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.166928300E09 +++$+++ The sub-page was abandoned, and should probably be deleted.  It was created when Droliver and I were arguing about content before Dr. Z came aboard.  David (the MD) suggested that we leave the 'online' version and edit a \"working page\".   The problem is that nobody but DOliver and I cared about what happened on the page.  DOliver resisted (as he still does) any change that is not exactly what he wants.  This has nothing to do with accuracy, or 'mainstream' information.  It does have everything to do with wanting to cherry pick only the information that is \"positive\" about breast implants.  For example, he called the FDA (US) recommendation (for follow-up MRI to detect rupture) a carrot for the \"anti-implant activists\" and did not want to even mention it.   For the most \"studied device in the world\", there are still no studies of the long-term effects of rupture, or the rate of rupture of the older-style implants, or of the new implants beyond 10 years (only one or two small studies that approach 10 years).  I have had a few bad experiences here - with Oliver, the insistence of some to keep an attack page of a lawyer (which is still there only under a different name) and acceptance of a puff piece on a plastic surgeon that was badly written and unsourced.   +++$+++ The sub-page was abandoned, and should probably be deleted.  It was created when Droliver and I were arguing about content before Dr. Z came aboard.  David (the MD) suggested that we leave the 'online' version and edit a "working page".   The problem is that nobody but DOliver and I cared about what happened on the page.  DOliver resisted (as he still does) any change that is not exactly what he wants.  This has nothing to do with accuracy, or 'mainstream' information.  It does have everything to do with wanting to cherry pick only the information that is "positive" about breast implants.  For example, he called the FDA (US) recommendation (for follow-up MRI to detect rupture) a carrot for the "anti-implant activists" and did not want to even mention it.   For the most "studied device in the world", there are still no studies of the long-term effects of rupture, or the rate of rupture of the older-style implants, or of the new implants beyond 10 years (only one or two small studies that approach 10 years).  I have had a few bad experiences here - with Oliver, the insistence of some to keep an attack page of a lawyer (which is still there only under a different name) and acceptance of a puff piece on a plastic surgeon that was badly written and unsourced.  [[User:Jance|Jance]] 18:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
273333 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273332 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.166943120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification on the RfC.  I have scanned the RfCs since, and I  wonder if the majority of those who jump in a fray were also in high school cliques.  I too am sorry for the multiple edits, but I can be rather \"anal\" about my mistakes. +++$+++ ::Thanks for the clarification on the RfC.  I have scanned the RfCs since, and I  wonder if the majority of those who jump in a fray were also in high school cliques.  I too am sorry for the multiple edits, but I can be rather "anal" about my mistakes.[[User:Jance|Jance]] 22:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

11189 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11189 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-30 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.304154900E09 +++$+++ I've started a preliminary page for The Office season finale [[User:SchrutedIt08\/Search committee|here]]. I will move it to an episode page when there is more information available. If you have something or anything to contribute that would be greatly appreciated. Cheers.  +++$+++ I've started a preliminary page for The Office season finale [[User:SchrutedIt08/Search committee|here]]. I will move it to an episode page when there is more information available. If you have something or anything to contribute that would be greatly appreciated. Cheers. [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08|talk]]) 02:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
11190 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11189 +++$+++ 11189 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.304200500E09 +++$+++ It looks good, there's not that much info released right now so there's not that much else that could be added at the moment. The only changes I would make would be minor wording changes in the lead, noting it's the hour-long seventh season finale right at the beginning, instead at the end; mainly for consistency with previous season finale articles. Again, just very minor things with the placement of the words, but it's all good.  +++$+++ :It looks good, there's not that much info released right now so there's not that much else that could be added at the moment. The only changes I would make would be minor wording changes in the lead, noting it's the hour-long seventh season finale right at the beginning, instead at the end; mainly for consistency with previous season finale articles. Again, just very minor things with the placement of the words, but it's all good. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 14:55, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

273334 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-25 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.167038700E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Breast_implant] (I still dont know how to do a \"diff\" although I will try to find out... Dr. Z hs not declared this, and why is she a \"3rd party\"?  He has also called her \"Diane\" (which is not her name and he knows it), although he goes by \"Dr.Oliver\".  Personally, I think that \"Dr\" on Wiki is rather pretentious on anyone's part, but this use by DrOliver of an incorrect name is deliberate (as she has corrected him more than once and if he knows her work this well, he probably knows her name).  .  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Breast_implant] (I still dont know how to do a "diff" although I will try to find out... Dr. Z hs not declared this, and why is she a "3rd party"?  He has also called her "Diane" (which is not her name and he knows it), although he goes by "Dr.Oliver".  Personally, I think that "Dr" on Wiki is rather pretentious on anyone's part, but this use by DrOliver of an incorrect name is deliberate (as she has corrected him more than once and if he knows her work this well, he probably knows her name).  . [[User:Jance|Jance]] 01:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
273335 +++$+++ BenAveling +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273334 +++$+++ 273334 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.167308580E09 +++$+++ Hi Janice, to create a link to a diff, go to the page you want, select history, select the revisions you want to compare and click the Compare button.  Then cut and paste the URL. For eg, here is where I wished Sarah a Merry Christmas earlier. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASarah_Ewart&diff=96409089&oldid=96399051]  As always, do a preview before you Save Page.  Depending on your browser, you can probably right click on the link to make sure it works as you expect.  All the best,  +++$+++ :Hi Janice, to create a link to a diff, go to the page you want, select history, select the revisions you want to compare and click the Compare button.  Then cut and paste the URL. For eg, here is where I wished Sarah a Merry Christmas earlier. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASarah_Ewart&diff=96409089&oldid=96399051]  As always, do a preview before you Save Page.  Depending on your browser, you can probably right click on the link to make sure it works as you expect.  All the best, [[User talk:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 04:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

395081 +++$+++ Mlpearc +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-10 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.270885800E09 +++$+++ It's really a shame and a big disapointment to happen across this discussion about this type of issues and behavior with these types of names\/editors involved. If I am out of line with this comment because I hav'nt seen the whole picture, please accept my apologies, but if the surface is what it is then \"WOW\" ''' +++$+++ It's really a shame and a big disapointment to happen across this discussion about this type of issues and behavior with these types of names/editors involved. If I am out of line with this comment because I hav'nt seen the whole picture, please accept my apologies, but if the surface is what it is then "WOW" '''[[User:Mlpearc|<span style='font-family:;color:#CFB53B'>Mlpearc</span>]] [[User_talk:Mlpearc|<span style='font-family:;COLOR:#848482'><small>MESSAGE</small></span>]]''' 00:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
395082 +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395081 +++$+++ 395081 +++$+++ 2010-04-10 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.270908060E09 +++$+++ But the only diff she gives is for [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Maurreen | my RFA]], with a 5\/5\/3 result, when I'd had about three months of experience.   +++$+++ :But the only diff she gives is for [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Maurreen | my RFA]], with a 5/5/3 result, when I'd had about three months of experience.  [[User:Maurreen|Maurreen]] ([[User talk:Maurreen#top|talk]]) 07:01, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
395083 +++$+++ Mlpearc +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395081 +++$+++ 395081 +++$+++ 2010-04-10 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.270947120E09 +++$+++ Please, I'm the new kid in the block, I don't think or feel any less of anybody (as if mattered if I did). I think I was in a weird mood yesterday when I wrote this, but I know we all try so hard to be Honorable and Fair, we as editors and people try to keep our integrity to the highest level as the pages we write, edit and protect. This just caught me off guard. I say this with all due respect. I still don't know why I always tend to be so \"Heavy\" lol. have a great day to all ''' +++$+++ *Please, I'm the new kid in the block, I don't think or feel any less of anybody (as if mattered if I did). I think I was in a weird mood yesterday when I wrote this, but I know we all try so hard to be Honorable and Fair, we as editors and people try to keep our integrity to the highest level as the pages we write, edit and protect. This just caught me off guard. I say this with all due respect. I still don't know why I always tend to be so "Heavy" lol. have a great day to all '''[[User:Mlpearc|<span style='font-family:;color:#CFB53B'>Mlpearc</span>]] [[User_talk:Mlpearc|<span style='font-family:;COLOR:#848482'><small>MESSAGE</small></span>]]''' 17:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
395084 +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ Maurreen +++$+++ 395081 +++$+++ 395083 +++$+++ 2010-04-10 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.270947420E09 +++$+++ Please, not to worry. You did nothing \"heavy\" or wrong at all. I'm sorry if I came off the wrong way. The related stuff (not you at all) caught me off guard as well. Have a good day; have a great life!  +++$+++ ::Please, not to worry. You did nothing "heavy" or wrong at all. I'm sorry if I came off the wrong way. The related stuff (not you at all) caught me off guard as well. Have a good day; have a great life! [[User:Maurreen|Maurreen]] ([[User talk:Maurreen#top|talk]]) 17:57, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

11192 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.307914140E09 +++$+++ Nice work on [[Restless (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)]] so far! I've had this article on my back burner for a long time but never got up the gumption to actually start working on it. Let me know if you'd like any help copyediting, etc., as you work. [http:\/\/www.slayageonline.com\/PDF\/pateman.pdf Here] is a source I was considering using (I haven't even read all of it yet, but if you find anything useful in it feel free to work it in). Best, <b class=\"IPA\">[[Special:Contributions\/Rjanag|r<font color=\"#8B0000\">\u02a8<\/font>ana\u0262]]<\/b>&nbsp;( +++$+++ Nice work on [[Restless (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)]] so far! I've had this article on my back burner for a long time but never got up the gumption to actually start working on it. Let me know if you'd like any help copyediting, etc., as you work. [http://www.slayageonline.com/PDF/pateman.pdf Here] is a source I was considering using (I haven't even read all of it yet, but if you find anything useful in it feel free to work it in). Best, <b class="IPA">[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;([[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]) 14:29, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
11193 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11192 +++$+++ 11192 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.307914680E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much! I doubt it'll even come close to matching the quality of the \"[[Hush (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)|Hush]]\", \"[[The Body (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)|The Body]]\", or \"[[Once More, with Feeling (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)|Once More, with Feeling]]\" articles, but I definitely want to expand it as the article deserves it. Right now, I'm mainly using Whedon's commentary and the Season 4 Overview featurette as my references. And yeah, Slayage has lots of great articles that can be worked it, but now I'm just concentrating on getting all the notes I have from the commentary in the article. Feel free to do any copyediting as well, as I'm sure there might be some small errors in grammar. Now back to work!  +++$+++ :Thanks so much! I doubt it'll even come close to matching the quality of the "[[Hush (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)|Hush]]", "[[The Body (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)|The Body]]", or "[[Once More, with Feeling (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)|Once More, with Feeling]]" articles, but I definitely want to expand it as the article deserves it. Right now, I'm mainly using Whedon's commentary and the Season 4 Overview featurette as my references. And yeah, Slayage has lots of great articles that can be worked it, but now I'm just concentrating on getting all the notes I have from the commentary in the article. Feel free to do any copyediting as well, as I'm sure there might be some small errors in grammar. Now back to work! [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 14:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

45556 +++$+++ Truthkeeper88 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-07 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.275945300E09 +++$+++ I thought I'd let it sit for a few days to regain perspective and a nice person came along and fixed the prose problems. Thanks so much!  +++$+++ I thought I'd let it sit for a few days to regain perspective and a nice person came along and fixed the prose problems. Thanks so much! [[User:Truthkeeper88|Truthkeeper88]] ([[User talk:Truthkeeper88|talk]]) 14:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
45557 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45556 +++$+++ 45556 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.275978480E09 +++$+++ Phew! I'm glad you're happy with it. I saw the section about the article on Malleus's talk page and went to have a look. It's a really good article and, looking at the history, you seem to have done nearly all the hard work on it so I was a bit nervous about changing anything. However, I made the odd little change and then my fingers got itchy and I just couldn't help myself. I find articles always are always improved with a bit of collaboration - most of mine get copyedited by Malleus or PoD. I believe even top journalists have their work overseen, and often changed by an editor. :) I've still got a bit further to go on the Evans article but hopefully I should be finished tonight. I'd never heard of the guy before, although I've seen his work in Beatrix Potter's books - but now I'm a fan!  +++$+++ :Phew! I'm glad you're happy with it. I saw the section about the article on Malleus's talk page and went to have a look. It's a really good article and, looking at the history, you seem to have done nearly all the hard work on it so I was a bit nervous about changing anything. However, I made the odd little change and then my fingers got itchy and I just couldn't help myself. I find articles always are always improved with a bit of collaboration - most of mine get copyedited by Malleus or PoD. I believe even top journalists have their work overseen, and often changed by an editor. :) I've still got a bit further to go on the Evans article but hopefully I should be finished tonight. I'd never heard of the guy before, although I've seen his work in Beatrix Potter's books - but now I'm a fan! [[User:Richerman|Richerman]] ([[User talk:Richerman#top|talk]]) 23:28, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
45558 +++$+++ Truthkeeper88 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45556 +++$+++ 45557 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.275979260E09 +++$+++ I'm absolutely pleased. It's so much better having another person find errors and restructure bad sentences. I'm waiting for one more book to arrive, so it has a little more work to be done, and I thought I'd slog through the copyediting at the end. Yes, I've done all the work. Found it as a single sentence stub (through researching something else) and the article took off, but finding sources has been difficult. Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::I'm absolutely pleased. It's so much better having another person find errors and restructure bad sentences. I'm waiting for one more book to arrive, so it has a little more work to be done, and I thought I'd slog through the copyediting at the end. Yes, I've done all the work. Found it as a single sentence stub (through researching something else) and the article took off, but finding sources has been difficult. Thanks again. [[User:Truthkeeper88|Truthkeeper88]] ([[User talk:Truthkeeper88|talk]]) 23:41, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
45559 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45556 +++$+++ 45558 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.275981120E09 +++$+++ And a fine job you've done too! - I think it's pretty close to FA standard now. Isn't wikipedia wonderful? You come across an obscure article on something you know nothing about, you make some edits and put it on your watch list and before you know it you're an expert. I've finished the first pass on the copyediting for now, although I'll probably still make some changes to my own edits when I read them again :) I just have a couple of other suggestions: To my eyes there seems to be too much use of quotation marks - for example, I don't think phrases like \"perfected a process of colour printing from wood blocks\" or \"across the end grain\" need the quotes as they are referenced anyway. Also, could I suggest that the name of the gallery section is changed to something else, say  \"Other examples of Evans' illustrations\"?  +++$+++ :::And a fine job you've done too! - I think it's pretty close to FA standard now. Isn't wikipedia wonderful? You come across an obscure article on something you know nothing about, you make some edits and put it on your watch list and before you know it you're an expert. I've finished the first pass on the copyediting for now, although I'll probably still make some changes to my own edits when I read them again :) I just have a couple of other suggestions: To my eyes there seems to be too much use of quotation marks - for example, I don't think phrases like "perfected a process of colour printing from wood blocks" or "across the end grain" need the quotes as they are referenced anyway. Also, could I suggest that the name of the gallery section is changed to something else, say  "Other examples of Evans' illustrations"? [[User:Richerman|Richerman]] ([[User talk:Richerman#top|talk]]) 00:12, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
45560 +++$+++ Truthkeeper88 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45556 +++$+++ 45559 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.275981900E09 +++$+++ When I work directly from sources I tend to use direct quotations to avoid close paraphrasing, and then after some time has passed reword entire sections. I didn't want it to sound to peacocky though, hence keeping \"perfected a process of colour printing from wood blocks\" in quotes. Thanks for the suggestion about the gallery. Yes, Wikipedia is wonderful. I don't know whether you've read the talkpage, but Johnbod has been very helpful as far as my understanding of the printing process itself - which I found somewhat confusing.  +++$+++ ::::When I work directly from sources I tend to use direct quotations to avoid close paraphrasing, and then after some time has passed reword entire sections. I didn't want it to sound to peacocky though, hence keeping "perfected a process of colour printing from wood blocks" in quotes. Thanks for the suggestion about the gallery. Yes, Wikipedia is wonderful. I don't know whether you've read the talkpage, but Johnbod has been very helpful as far as my understanding of the printing process itself - which I found somewhat confusing. [[User:Truthkeeper88|Truthkeeper88]] ([[User talk:Truthkeeper88|talk]]) 00:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
45561 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45556 +++$+++ 45560 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.275982140E09 +++$+++ Yes, I did see that Johnbod had helped out. I see Malleus has made some edits too now - which can only be a good thing.  +++$+++ :::::Yes, I did see that Johnbod had helped out. I see Malleus has made some edits too now - which can only be a good thing. [[User:Richerman|Richerman]] ([[User talk:Richerman#top|talk]]) 00:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
45562 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45556 +++$+++ 45561 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.275982860E09 +++$+++ Even though it's widely believed that I'm an unhelpul, uncooperative, and generally unpleasant sob, I do occasionally try to help. I think it's a great article Truthkeeper. I'm still not sure how his printing process worked though. I had the idea at one point that he drew onto the wooden blocks, which made me think that he used some kind of wax that repelled the ink where he didn't want it to be on the block, but then it talked about engraving and etching the blocks. I know squit about printing though, so it may just be me.  +++$+++ ::::::Even though it's widely believed that I'm an unhelpul, uncooperative, and generally unpleasant sob, I do occasionally try to help. I think it's a great article Truthkeeper. I'm still not sure how his printing process worked though. I had the idea at one point that he drew onto the wooden blocks, which made me think that he used some kind of wax that repelled the ink where he didn't want it to be on the block, but then it talked about engraving and etching the blocks. I know squit about printing though, so it may just be me. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 00:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
45563 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45556 +++$+++ 45562 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.275983280E09 +++$+++ Never let it be said....you've helped me out lots of times, In fact, you've got that third sentence just about right now. No, it's not just you  - I'm a bit confused about the process too - but then I suspect Truthkeeper is still struggling a bit as well. :)  +++$+++ :::::::Never let it be said....you've helped me out lots of times, In fact, you've got that third sentence just about right now. No, it's not just you  - I'm a bit confused about the process too - but then I suspect Truthkeeper is still struggling a bit as well. :) [[User:Richerman|Richerman]] ([[User talk:Richerman#top|talk]]) 00:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
45564 +++$+++ Truthkeeper88 +++$+++ Richerman +++$+++ 45556 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.275983580E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict) I know nothing either, but it had to have been labor intensive. A separate block for each color, which meant the printer had to understand where the colors went. Apparently, his innovation was to somehow mix colors by printing over and over. A lot of carving and a lot of labour went into it, but as Johnbod mentioned, labour was cheap. Thanks, Malleus for the help (twice today!) and for the compliment. And, as I mentioned on your page, because of you (oh, you awful editor!) the article is much better than it was.  +++$+++ :::::::::(edit conflict) I know nothing either, but it had to have been labor intensive. A separate block for each color, which meant the printer had to understand where the colors went. Apparently, his innovation was to somehow mix colors by printing over and over. A lot of carving and a lot of labour went into it, but as Johnbod mentioned, labour was cheap. Thanks, Malleus for the help (twice today!) and for the compliment. And, as I mentioned on your page, because of you (oh, you awful editor!) the article is much better than it was. [[User:Truthkeeper88|Truthkeeper88]] ([[User talk:Truthkeeper88|talk]]) 00:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

11194 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11194 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-15 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.308184620E09 +++$+++ Regulars sections are only allowed when the infobox covers the episodes list, when it doesn't, not even that is allowed. I will try and find the guidelines for you.  +++$+++ Regulars sections are only allowed when the infobox covers the episodes list, when it doesn't, not even that is allowed. I will try and find the guidelines for you. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 17:37, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
11195 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11194 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.308199500E09 +++$+++ I was told there isn't exactly a \"Guideline\" but it's the usual stuff. It needs to be sourced, notable. The list is unsourced.  +++$+++ ::I was told there isn't exactly a "Guideline" but it's the usual stuff. It needs to be sourced, notable. The list is unsourced. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 21:45, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

89247 +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-27 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.201503120E09 +++$+++ Do not blank articles as you did with this article. This kind of action is a serious act of damage to Wikipedia, and is considered by many as [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] & may lead to you being banned from Wikipedia. You have been on Wikipedia long enough to know this. -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] ([[User talk:Llywrch|talk]]) 21:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Ok. +++$+++ Do not blank articles as you did with this article. This kind of action is a serious act of damage to Wikipedia, and is considered by many as [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] & may lead to you being banned from Wikipedia. You have been on Wikipedia long enough to know this. -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] ([[User talk:Llywrch|talk]]) 21:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Ok.[[User:Asiaticus|Asiaticus]] ([[User talk:Asiaticus#top|talk]]) 22:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
89248 +++$+++ Llywrch +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89247 +++$+++ 89247 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.202974620E09 +++$+++ Now I'm puzzled -- & embarassed. Why didn't you tell me that you were trying to merge this article with [[Kebur Zabangna\u200e]]??? While blanking the one article wasn't the right thing to do you ''did'' have a good reason for doing that, & had I known what you wanted to do I would have helped you with it. (Wikipedia has a lot of articles, so believe me when I say I forgot that I had nominated them for a merge.) Do I honestly come over as ''that'' intimidating? --  +++$+++ : Now I'm puzzled -- & embarassed. Why didn't you tell me that you were trying to merge this article with [[Kebur Zabangna‎]]??? While blanking the one article wasn't the right thing to do you ''did'' have a good reason for doing that, & had I known what you wanted to do I would have helped you with it. (Wikipedia has a lot of articles, so believe me when I say I forgot that I had nominated them for a merge.) Do I honestly come over as ''that'' intimidating? -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] ([[User talk:Llywrch|talk]]) 23:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

11196 +++$+++ Yk Yk Yk +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-22 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.308798840E09 +++$+++ Hi. May I ask how do you know the episodes' production codes? If you give me the source then you won't have to keep correcting my mistakes. Thanks! -  +++$+++ Hi. May I ask how do you know the episodes' production codes? If you give me the source then you won't have to keep correcting my mistakes. Thanks! - [[User:Yk Yk Yk|Yk<sup>3</sup>]] <small>'''[[User talk:Yk Yk Yk|talk]] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Yk Yk Yk|contrib]]'''</small> 20:14, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
11197 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11196 +++$+++ 11196 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.308800580E09 +++$+++ As there wasn't any source for these online, since the press releases simply state the number as what it is airing as and not the production number, and the show itself doesn't include them in the credits because technically they're not production ''codes'', just basic number designations, as not all shows have production codes. I was curious and wanted to know for the Wikipedia article, so I joined Twitter and asked the show's creator Dan Harmon and he responded (here's the tweets [http:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/danharmon\/status\/51394896833150976], [http:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/danharmon\/status\/51395347464982528], [http:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/danharmon\/status\/51395847967084544], [http:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/danharmon\/status\/51396242546241536]). So what's listed in the episode tables are correct, so just look there for the production numbers. Also, the [[Community (season 1)]] article needs some clean-up regarding the plot summaries, not sure if you'd be interested in cutting down those lengthy summaries. Anyway, great job on the episode articles for ''Community''!  +++$+++ :As there wasn't any source for these online, since the press releases simply state the number as what it is airing as and not the production number, and the show itself doesn't include them in the credits because technically they're not production ''codes'', just basic number designations, as not all shows have production codes. I was curious and wanted to know for the Wikipedia article, so I joined Twitter and asked the show's creator Dan Harmon and he responded (here's the tweets [http://twitter.com/#!/danharmon/status/51394896833150976], [http://twitter.com/#!/danharmon/status/51395347464982528], [http://twitter.com/#!/danharmon/status/51395847967084544], [http://twitter.com/#!/danharmon/status/51396242546241536]). So what's listed in the episode tables are correct, so just look there for the production numbers. Also, the [[Community (season 1)]] article needs some clean-up regarding the plot summaries, not sure if you'd be interested in cutting down those lengthy summaries. Anyway, great job on the episode articles for ''Community''! [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 20:43, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
11198 +++$+++ Yk Yk Yk +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11196 +++$+++ 11197 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.308801360E09 +++$+++ I gotta say, that's pretty awesome. And I should've realized they were all there in the episode tables. Thanks! -  +++$+++ ::I gotta say, that's pretty awesome. And I should've realized they were all there in the episode tables. Thanks! - [[User:Yk Yk Yk|Yk<sup>3</sup>]] <small>'''[[User talk:Yk Yk Yk|talk]] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Yk Yk Yk|contrib]]'''</small> 20:56, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

535486 +++$+++ Woohookitty +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.168793940E09 +++$+++ Maybe. But he was warned several times about it and just kept on going without discussion. Just seemed like a serial spammer type. -- +++$+++ Maybe. But he was warned several times about it and just kept on going without discussion. Just seemed like a serial spammer type. --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|Woohoo!]]</sup> 08:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
535487 +++$+++ Woohookitty +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535486 +++$+++ 535486 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 09:06:00 +++$+++ 1.168794360E09 +++$+++ I went ahead and rescinded the block and explained the general policy on the user's talk page. Sounds like he simply didn't know. If he can get consensus on adding that link to a heavily trafficked article like [[Bacteria]], great. It's just not a good idea to add links en masse like that. -- +++$+++ :I went ahead and rescinded the block and explained the general policy on the user's talk page. Sounds like he simply didn't know. If he can get consensus on adding that link to a heavily trafficked article like [[Bacteria]], great. It's just not a good idea to add links en masse like that. --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|Woohoo!]]</sup> 09:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
535488 +++$+++ Woohookitty +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535486 +++$+++ 535487 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 09:07:00 +++$+++ 1.168794420E09 +++$+++ Yeah I usually would agree with my rationale too. :) But it looks like he really just didn't know. -- +++$+++ ::Yeah I usually would agree with my rationale too. :) But it looks like he really just didn't know. --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|Woohoo!]]</sup> 09:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
535489 +++$+++ Woohookitty +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535486 +++$+++ 535488 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.168794600E09 +++$+++ Yeah. Me too! :) We get so used to the bad that I think we sometimes forget that some people are just...newbies. :) -- +++$+++ :::Yeah. Me too! :) We get so used to the bad that I think we sometimes forget that some people are just...newbies. :) --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|Woohoo!]]</sup> 09:10, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

11199 +++$+++ SchrutedIt08 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.310327820E09 +++$+++ We've got to do something about this Richardsan guy. I've left him a final notice warning on his talk page (I see he hasn't responded to either of our comments) but I'm thinking he's not just going to stop now.  +++$+++ We've got to do something about this Richardsan guy. I've left him a final notice warning on his talk page (I see he hasn't responded to either of our comments) but I'm thinking he's not just going to stop now. [[User:SchrutedIt08|SchrutedIt08]] ([[User talk:SchrutedIt08|talk]]) 12:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
11200 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11199 +++$+++ 11199 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.310331120E09 +++$+++ Yeah, it's quite annoying, and even more annoying when the person doesn't bother responding on their talk page, it's not like the person doesn't know they have a message. The thing is, it's not outright vandalism, he's just adding information that's not really notable or related to the page he's putting it on. Sure, the character mentioned that event, but it's not related to the episode's plot whatsoever. The main point he's adding is the real-life events, which is even more not related to the show, and unsourced. Not sure what we can do.  +++$+++ :Yeah, it's quite annoying, and even more annoying when the person doesn't bother responding on their talk page, it's not like the person doesn't know they have a message. The thing is, it's not outright vandalism, he's just adding information that's not really notable or related to the page he's putting it on. Sure, the character mentioned that event, but it's not related to the episode's plot whatsoever. The main point he's adding is the real-life events, which is even more not related to the show, and unsourced. Not sure what we can do. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 13:52, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
11201 +++$+++ Knownalias +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11199 +++$+++ 11200 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.310405400E09 +++$+++ I stumbled across this, and I agree that it's trivia; the first stage is to initiate a conversation on the talk page to try to build a consensus, which I've initiated for you, even extending a personal invitation to Richardsan to join in.  As this is a content dispute, any real intervention is probably not going to come from AIV (unless Richardsan just fails to take part in ''any'' conversation), but from [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and only if talks fail to resolve anything.  He's already in violation of [[WP:BRD]], so he needs to get involved in the discussion.   +++$+++ ::I stumbled across this, and I agree that it's trivia; the first stage is to initiate a conversation on the talk page to try to build a consensus, which I've initiated for you, even extending a personal invitation to Richardsan to join in.  As this is a content dispute, any real intervention is probably not going to come from AIV (unless Richardsan just fails to take part in ''any'' conversation), but from [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and only if talks fail to resolve anything.  He's already in violation of [[WP:BRD]], so he needs to get involved in the discussion.  [[User:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "Kristen ITC"; color:#23297A'>KnownAlias </span>]][[User talk:Knownalias|<span style='font-family: "AR BERKLEY"; color:#000000'><u> X </u></span>]] 10:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

11202 +++$+++ TEHodson +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11202 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311932940E09 +++$+++ Hello. Have you checked out what's been happening on the Buffy pages? Anonymous users and a new one (I think it's the same person with a name, finally) have been adding hundreds of edits, turning the ep pages into a real mess of OR and trivia. Take a look at [[The Harvest (Buffy the Vampire Slayer episode) |The Harvest]] and tell me what you think. I believe the intentions are good--they're trying to expand the pages--but it's kind of a mess. I've reverted some of the most agregious, but don't even know where to start on some of the pages where there are dozens of changes. I'd like your opinion. Thanks.-- +++$+++ Hello. Have you checked out what's been happening on the Buffy pages? Anonymous users and a new one (I think it's the same person with a name, finally) have been adding hundreds of edits, turning the ep pages into a real mess of OR and trivia. Take a look at [[The Harvest (Buffy the Vampire Slayer episode) |The Harvest]] and tell me what you think. I believe the intentions are good--they're trying to expand the pages--but it's kind of a mess. I've reverted some of the most agregious, but don't even know where to start on some of the pages where there are dozens of changes. I'd like your opinion. Thanks.--[[User talk:TEHodson|TEHodson]] 02:49, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
11203 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11202 +++$+++ 11202 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.312003680E09 +++$+++ Has all this been resolved now? I took a look the IPs talk pages, and it seems fine now, is it?  +++$+++ :Has all this been resolved now? I took a look the IPs talk pages, and it seems fine now, is it? [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 22:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
11204 +++$+++ TEHodson +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11202 +++$+++ 11203 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312003920E09 +++$+++ Pretty much. I meant to leave you a message sooner, but I've been unwell today. Sorry. There appear to be some edits left which weren't easily reverted, but the two guys who did it all have stopped. I encouraged them to stay and learn and contribute, but they declined. I'll go through all the eps later when I feel better, or if you want to, leave me a message to that effect. Thanks.-- +++$+++ ::Pretty much. I meant to leave you a message sooner, but I've been unwell today. Sorry. There appear to be some edits left which weren't easily reverted, but the two guys who did it all have stopped. I encouraged them to stay and learn and contribute, but they declined. I'll go through all the eps later when I feel better, or if you want to, leave me a message to that effect. Thanks.--[[User talk:TEHodson|TEHodson]] 22:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
11205 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11202 +++$+++ 11204 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312008420E09 +++$+++ I briefly looked through the episode articles that were edited, and they look pretty fine now. Also, not sure if you've checked out the [[Restless (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)]] article I recently cleaned up an did a major expansion on (waiting on a GA review), if you want you could take a look at it and make any necessary copyedits and\/or improvements.  +++$+++ :::I briefly looked through the episode articles that were edited, and they look pretty fine now. Also, not sure if you've checked out the [[Restless (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)]] article I recently cleaned up an did a major expansion on (waiting on a GA review), if you want you could take a look at it and make any necessary copyedits and/or improvements. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 23:47, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
11206 +++$+++ TEHodson +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11202 +++$+++ 11205 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.312008660E09 +++$+++ Yes! I love, love, love that episode. A masterpiece of surrealistic filmmaking. Maybe I'll add a section about that--Cocteau, Maya Deren, Bunuel influences. Do you think that would be appropriate? I was an expressionistic, surrealistic filmmaker for many years. I wonder what sources I could find to back up my ideas. I have no idea whether anyone's analyzed Buffy eps in terms of the filmmaking, per se. Do you?-- +++$+++ ::::Yes! I love, love, love that episode. A masterpiece of surrealistic filmmaking. Maybe I'll add a section about that--Cocteau, Maya Deren, Bunuel influences. Do you think that would be appropriate? I was an expressionistic, surrealistic filmmaker for many years. I wonder what sources I could find to back up my ideas. I have no idea whether anyone's analyzed Buffy eps in terms of the filmmaking, per se. Do you?--[[User talk:TEHodson|TEHodson]] 23:51, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
11207 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11202 +++$+++ 11206 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.312010340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions! Although I corrected a bit, it was Tara that said those words not the First Slayer. There's a good resource from Slayage earlier in my talk page in the [[#Restless]] section.  +++$+++ :::::Thanks for your contributions! Although I corrected a bit, it was Tara that said those words not the First Slayer. There's a good resource from Slayage earlier in my talk page in the [[#Restless]] section. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 00:19, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

273348 +++$+++ A Kiwi +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-28 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.167329280E09 +++$+++ Again, thank you for the move.  Bless you for not deleting it.  -- +++$+++ Again, thank you for the move.  Bless you for not deleting it.  --[[User:A Kiwi|Kiwi]] 10:08, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
273349 +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273348 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.168477980E09 +++$+++ (m) above link fixed to archive \/\/ <B> +++$+++ ::(m) above link fixed to archive // <B>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</B><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 17:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

535493 +++$+++ Adambro +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.168814400E09 +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for semi protecting my user page but could I ask that you remove the protection on my talk page. I would prefer if vandals post comments about me on there as opposed to by vandalizing articles to which I am associated such as what is happening with [[Huddersfield]] and [[Electrical engineering]]. The vandal in question has returned once again using the IP [[Special:Contributions\/172.212.96.179|172.212.96.179]]. Thanks for your help.  +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for semi protecting my user page but could I ask that you remove the protection on my talk page. I would prefer if vandals post comments about me on there as opposed to by vandalizing articles to which I am associated such as what is happening with [[Huddersfield]] and [[Electrical engineering]]. The vandal in question has returned once again using the IP [[Special:Contributions/172.212.96.179|172.212.96.179]]. Thanks for your help. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] 14:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
535494 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535493 +++$+++ 535493 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.168814580E09 +++$+++ Your choice, of course. I unprotected it. Regards,  +++$+++ :Your choice, of course. I unprotected it. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 14:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

273350 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-28 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.167332640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note, the attempt at a sub pages (there was one for the proceedure and a separate one for the risks and debate over the issues) was an attempt to help the participants in an edit war to discuss changes to a draft version before \"going live\" - the article was being edited & reverted at a rate no one else could follow. I think the subsequnet temporary protecting of teh page by Samir had a better effect, but teh editing\/reversion rate is again building up. I'll approach the involved editors to see if they still want a draft version to discuss changes over - but I suspect we will end up asking for its deletion as a failed mediation approach - again many thanks :-)  +++$+++ Thanks for the note, the attempt at a sub pages (there was one for the proceedure and a separate one for the risks and debate over the issues) was an attempt to help the participants in an edit war to discuss changes to a draft version before "going live" - the article was being edited & reverted at a rate no one else could follow. I think the subsequnet temporary protecting of teh page by Samir had a better effect, but teh editing/reversion rate is again building up. I'll approach the involved editors to see if they still want a draft version to discuss changes over - but I suspect we will end up asking for its deletion as a failed mediation approach - again many thanks :-) [[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 11:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
273351 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273350 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.167345000E09 +++$+++ So the solution to Droliver's  \"POV pushing\" and \"political campaigning\" allegations is for us to write a separate article???  I hope you didn't mean what I think.  Maybe I haven't had enough coffee this morning. +++$+++ ::So the solution to Droliver's  "POV pushing" and "political campaigning" allegations is for us to write a separate article???  I hope you didn't mean what I think.  Maybe I haven't had enough coffee this morning.[[User:Jance|Jance]] 14:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

535495 +++$+++ Agathoclea +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.168815060E09 +++$+++ hmm I am not too sure. AOL does use proxies but the one you tagged lookes like someone on a home IP which lasts until the next router reboot. AFAIK people bypass the proxy when they use a browser other than AOL's.  +++$+++ hmm I am not too sure. AOL does use proxies but the one you tagged lookes like someone on a home IP which lasts until the next router reboot. AFAIK people bypass the proxy when they use a browser other than AOL's. [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] 14:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
535496 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535495 +++$+++ 535495 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.168815180E09 +++$+++ I just realised after reading [[Wikipedia:AOL]]. It is no longer shared. Would your recommend a range block?  +++$+++ :I just realised after reading [[Wikipedia:AOL]]. It is no longer shared. Would your recommend a range block? [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 14:53, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
535497 +++$+++ Agathoclea +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535495 +++$+++ 535496 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.168815660E09 +++$+++ Not too sure. I am dealing with with one vandal at [[Fiona Phillips]] - one edit made me think it is the same, but the other edits were out of profile. Range block would effect a lot of people. What I do do though, is if the vandal returns block strait away as \"previously warned on different IP of same range\". But you only can do that if there is a very clear pattern.  +++$+++ ::Not too sure. I am dealing with with one vandal at [[Fiona Phillips]] - one edit made me think it is the same, but the other edits were out of profile. Range block would effect a lot of people. What I do do though, is if the vandal returns block strait away as "previously warned on different IP of same range". But you only can do that if there is a very clear pattern. [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] 15:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
535498 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535495 +++$+++ 535497 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.168816020E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm sure it is the same guy but would not like to kill a fly with a nuke either. I've semiprotected many of the articles s\/he's been hitting. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Well, I'm sure it is the same guy but would not like to kill a fly with a nuke either. I've semiprotected many of the articles s/he's been hitting. Cheers, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 15:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

11208 +++$+++ TEHodson +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11208 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.312010700E09 +++$+++ Yes, I clarified that below, that it was Tara speaking for the Slayer, wasn't it? -- +++$+++ Yes, I clarified that below, that it was Tara speaking for the Slayer, wasn't it? --[[User talk:TEHodson|TEHodson]] 00:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
11209 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11208 +++$+++ 11208 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312011960E09 +++$+++ Hm, I guess that is true. In the last sequence in the desert, Tara is speaking for the First Slayer as she can't speak. But in Buffy's bedroom, it's just Tara and Buffy, so it's hard to state that she's also talking for the First Slayer there as well. For simplicity, maybe just leave it as Tara, unless a source can be given. I know Joss refers to Tara as a spirit guide in her dreams.  +++$+++ :Hm, I guess that is true. In the last sequence in the desert, Tara is speaking for the First Slayer as she can't speak. But in Buffy's bedroom, it's just Tara and Buffy, so it's hard to state that she's also talking for the First Slayer there as well. For simplicity, maybe just leave it as Tara, unless a source can be given. I know Joss refers to Tara as a spirit guide in her dreams. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 00:46, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

273353 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-28 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.167370800E09 +++$+++ Of course I was being tongue in cheek.   But how else does one make a point, when everybody just ignores Oliver and allows him to continue his rants?  There is a difference between being aware of a problem and doing something about it. +++$+++ Of course I was being tongue in cheek.   But how else does one make a point, when everybody just ignores Oliver and allows him to continue his rants?  There is a difference between being aware of a problem and doing something about it.[[User:Jance|Jance]] 21:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
273354 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273353 +++$+++ 273353 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.167371040E09 +++$+++ And that \"someone\" is Oliver - and maybe those he has convinced of his righteousness.  The problem is that he continues to make these accusations.  Now I will not be disingenuous -- if Oliver continues to do that, I am going to respond in kind.  He is every bit as biased as Dr. Zuckerman or I.  So I take from your inaction and vagueness now that Oliver's continued accusations on the talk page are acceptable.  I will remember that.   +++$+++ :And that "someone" is Oliver - and maybe those he has convinced of his righteousness.  The problem is that he continues to make these accusations.  Now I will not be disingenuous -- if Oliver continues to do that, I am going to respond in kind.  He is every bit as biased as Dr. Zuckerman or I.  So I take from your inaction and vagueness now that Oliver's continued accusations on the talk page are acceptable.  I will remember that.  [[User:Jance|Jance]] 21:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
273355 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273353 +++$+++ 273354 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.167372660E09 +++$+++ And I did provide diffs.  So it is acceptable to continually complain that someone whose edits you don't like are \"pushing POV\" and \"the world's most active lobbiest\" etc?  With others, this is considered a violation of [[WP:AGF]], not to mention [[WP:CIVIL]].  But this is good to know, so I can equally state my opinions.  I won't bother you anymore.  +++$+++ ::And I did provide diffs.  So it is acceptable to continually complain that someone whose edits you don't like are "pushing POV" and "the world's most active lobbiest" etc?  With others, this is considered a violation of [[WP:AGF]], not to mention [[WP:CIVIL]].  But this is good to know, so I can equally state my opinions.  I won't bother you anymore. [[User:Jance|Jance]] 22:11, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
273356 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273353 +++$+++ 273355 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.167373140E09 +++$+++ Ok.  He will, in time.  He always does.  And, thank you for your explaining this.  (It just seemed that one was old, but I would have to look again and it isn't worth it.)  +++$+++ :::Ok.  He will, in time.  He always does.  And, thank you for your explaining this.  (It just seemed that one was old, but I would have to look again and it isn't worth it.) [[User:Jance|Jance]] 22:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

11210 +++$+++ TEHodson +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.312011000E09 +++$+++ I think her words should be in the plot summary, only because they are the last words of the ep, too (Buffy hears them in her head as she looks at either her own room or the one which will become Dawn's (have to check). I'll check, too, about Drac, but I was pretty certain he uses the exact same words. I just watched those episodes! Will double check, though.-- +++$+++ I think her words should be in the plot summary, only because they are the last words of the ep, too (Buffy hears them in her head as she looks at either her own room or the one which will become Dawn's (have to check). I'll check, too, about Drac, but I was pretty certain he uses the exact same words. I just watched those episodes! Will double check, though.--[[User talk:TEHodson|TEHodson]] 00:30, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
11211 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11210 +++$+++ 11210 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312011960E09 +++$+++ The words are in the plot summary. The phrase is ''slightly'' different when Dracula says it, I've looked at transcripts for the episodes. In Restless, it's \"You think you know ''who'' you are, what's to come. You haven't even begun.\" while Dracula says \"You think you know. ''What'' you are, what's to come... you haven't even begun.\" Very small difference, but it's not ''exact''.  +++$+++ :The words are in the plot summary. The phrase is ''slightly'' different when Dracula says it, I've looked at transcripts for the episodes. In Restless, it's "You think you know ''who'' you are, what's to come. You haven't even begun." while Dracula says "You think you know. ''What'' you are, what's to come... you haven't even begun." Very small difference, but it's not ''exact''. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 00:46, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
11212 +++$+++ TEHodson +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11210 +++$+++ 11211 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.312012080E09 +++$+++ I see. What interests me most about this episode is the formal aspect of it. There has been very little formal filmmaking on TV; Restless and Hush are the only two examples of it I have ever seen--even David Lynch's Twin Peaks doesn't really qualify (except possibly in the ep with the dream sequence) because, in my opinion, he's a more intuitive filmmaker than a cerebral one, and his ideas are a good deal less organized than Whedon's. Joss, when talking about The Body, said he did NOT want it to be a formal exercise as Hush and Restless had been because the emotional content was much too important to be so reductive about things (still, The Body is a study in form), and I'd like to find a way to put that in (but can't see a natural way right now, unless I expand on the Filmmaking section to include more about the context of the ep in the larger world of surrealist film. I will have to read up some on that before attempting it. You did a great job with this article, by the way. And thanks for inviting me to add my bits and bobs--the usual thing re Buffy eps seems to be ownership issues, so this was a nice change of pace. I may do some more after a bit of research.-- +++$+++ ::I see. What interests me most about this episode is the formal aspect of it. There has been very little formal filmmaking on TV; Restless and Hush are the only two examples of it I have ever seen--even David Lynch's Twin Peaks doesn't really qualify (except possibly in the ep with the dream sequence) because, in my opinion, he's a more intuitive filmmaker than a cerebral one, and his ideas are a good deal less organized than Whedon's. Joss, when talking about The Body, said he did NOT want it to be a formal exercise as Hush and Restless had been because the emotional content was much too important to be so reductive about things (still, The Body is a study in form), and I'd like to find a way to put that in (but can't see a natural way right now, unless I expand on the Filmmaking section to include more about the context of the ep in the larger world of surrealist film. I will have to read up some on that before attempting it. You did a great job with this article, by the way. And thanks for inviting me to add my bits and bobs--the usual thing re Buffy eps seems to be ownership issues, so this was a nice change of pace. I may do some more after a bit of research.--[[User talk:TEHodson|TEHodson]] 00:48, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
11213 +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ Drovethrughosts +++$+++ 11210 +++$+++ 11210 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.312013040E09 +++$+++ Yeah, feel free to add anything new that will improve the article, additions\/improvements are welcome! Anyway, I'm off for the night. Nice talking to you, and definitely reply here again if you need to with new stuff.  +++$+++ :Yeah, feel free to add anything new that will improve the article, additions/improvements are welcome! Anyway, I'm off for the night. Nice talking to you, and definitely reply here again if you need to with new stuff. [[User:Drovethrughosts|Drovethrughosts]] ([[User talk:Drovethrughosts#top|talk]]) 01:04, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

535499 +++$+++ Acidskater +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Acidskater|Acidskater]] 04:23 15 January, 2007 (UTC)
535500 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535499 +++$+++ 535499 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.168874760E09 +++$+++ It was recreated content which has been speedy deleted previously(A7 was the reason provided at the time, merely quoting it). This is the reason why I speedied it again. Ideally it should have been taken to [[WP:DR|deletion review]] before recreation. As I notice that you are not the same person who originally created the article, I will restore it and file an AfD later on today. Regards,  +++$+++ :It was recreated content which has been speedy deleted previously(A7 was the reason provided at the time, merely quoting it). This is the reason why I speedied it again. Ideally it should have been taken to [[WP:DR|deletion review]] before recreation. As I notice that you are not the same person who originally created the article, I will restore it and file an AfD later on today. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 07:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

273357 +++$+++ Drzuckerman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-29 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.167379800E09 +++$+++ I am spending some time on other articles on women's health that are not so contentious, but I would like to get the breast implant article back to something more accurate and balanced.  I appreciate your help. +++$+++ I am spending some time on other articles on women's health that are not so contentious, but I would like to get the breast implant article back to something more accurate and balanced.  I appreciate your help.[[User:Drzuckerman|Drzuckerman]] 00:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
273358 +++$+++ Droliver +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273357 +++$+++ 273357 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.167382800E09 +++$+++ I agree that a seperate article would achieve nothing as the same issues that Dr. Zuckerman has with the body of literature (that's easily summarized in a paragraph) and the pointed editorial voice are merely going to play out over a more extended forum. There is no way that many of the arguments she wishes to advance would be any more tolerable if they are made in the same fashion of signifigant reinterpretation of otherwise widely acknowledged work. I have asked for awhile to have Dr. Zuckerman or others come up with a succinct description of the case for implants as toxic which continues to devolve into a rearguing of the data, methods, & conclusions (and nuances thereof)of dozens of different papers. This grunt work has already been played out over & over in hearings world-wide, (many of which Dr. Zuckerman was present testifying at) and the conclusions of these are available for anyone to review.  +++$+++ * I agree that a seperate article would achieve nothing as the same issues that Dr. Zuckerman has with the body of literature (that's easily summarized in a paragraph) and the pointed editorial voice are merely going to play out over a more extended forum. There is no way that many of the arguments she wishes to advance would be any more tolerable if they are made in the same fashion of signifigant reinterpretation of otherwise widely acknowledged work. I have asked for awhile to have Dr. Zuckerman or others come up with a succinct description of the case for implants as toxic which continues to devolve into a rearguing of the data, methods, & conclusions (and nuances thereof)of dozens of different papers. This grunt work has already been played out over & over in hearings world-wide, (many of which Dr. Zuckerman was present testifying at) and the conclusions of these are available for anyone to review. [[User:Droliver|Droliver]] 01:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
273359 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273357 +++$+++ 273358 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.167398580E09 +++$+++ Okay, so Droliver can express his opinion, as indeed he has and does, continuously and repeatedly.  The gloss he puts on it is always the same - insulting and self-righteous. He portrays the issue in terms of black and white.  The long history of breast implants is hardly this simplistic - nor are the studies he himself cites.   I surely urge anyone to read the literature, rather than relying on Oliver's one-sided interpretation.  Dr. Zuckerman should not \"make a case\" that implants are \"toxic\" as Oliver first suggests here.  What is needed is a balanced representation of the existing literature, and what the known risks and benefits are.  Droliver only wishes to present the latter.  It is unfortunate that he would omit necessary information.   If Sarah or anyone else is at all interested in how \"neutral\" Oliver is, I would be happy to provide a couple of examples - what he said, and the actual text of the sources he cited.   I urge you to do so, before accepting what Oliver says as fact.  I admire Dr. Zuckerman's tact and patience, but it will be trampled here.    +++$+++ ::Okay, so Droliver can express his opinion, as indeed he has and does, continuously and repeatedly.  The gloss he puts on it is always the same - insulting and self-righteous. He portrays the issue in terms of black and white.  The long history of breast implants is hardly this simplistic - nor are the studies he himself cites.   I surely urge anyone to read the literature, rather than relying on Oliver's one-sided interpretation.  Dr. Zuckerman should not "make a case" that implants are "toxic" as Oliver first suggests here.  What is needed is a balanced representation of the existing literature, and what the known risks and benefits are.  Droliver only wishes to present the latter.  It is unfortunate that he would omit necessary information.   If Sarah or anyone else is at all interested in how "neutral" Oliver is, I would be happy to provide a couple of examples - what he said, and the actual text of the sources he cited.   I urge you to do so, before accepting what Oliver says as fact.  I admire Dr. Zuckerman's tact and patience, but it will be trampled here.   [[User:Jance|Jance]] 05:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
273360 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273357 +++$+++ 273359 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.167433320E09 +++$+++ I would add that Dr.Zuckerman is not the only one editing or otherwise involved with this article. There are two or three other people who are as \"qualified\" as he to review the literature  - but Oliver makes no effort to gain consensus.  Instead, he twists what is said, and portrays all of us as implant-hating or anti-science zealots.  That is absurd and needs to stop.   +++$+++ :::I would add that Dr.Zuckerman is not the only one editing or otherwise involved with this article. There are two or three other people who are as "qualified" as he to review the literature  - but Oliver makes no effort to gain consensus.  Instead, he twists what is said, and portrays all of us as implant-hating or anti-science zealots.  That is absurd and needs to stop.  [[User:Jance|Jance]] 15:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

535504 +++$+++ Hadžija +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535504 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.168918680E09 +++$+++ Just realised ''you'' might not have realised I'm Estavisti. I changed my username recently.-- +++$+++ Just realised ''you'' might not have realised I'm Estavisti. I changed my username recently.--[[User:Hadžija|Hadžija]] 19:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
535505 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535504 +++$+++ 535504 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.168918800E09 +++$+++ LOL! I did not know at first. It got me quite puzzled but then read further up the talk page.  +++$+++ :LOL! I did not know at first. It got me quite puzzled but then read further up the talk page. [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 19:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

535506 +++$+++ GiorgioOrsini +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535506 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-16 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.168948680E09 +++$+++ As to your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGiorgioOrsini&diff=100918493&oldid=100441457 message], I would like to warn you that you are abusing your admin account rights. All my reverts are already covered by very extensive discussion on the talk pages. The point is - I've removed pseudo-historical claims : a) Kingdom of Croatia did not exts after being conquered by Hungarians 1189 - ask about it a qualified historian of the medieval Europe b) Clovio's Croatian origins is forgery coming from today's Croatia. The message, as left on my talk page I could understand only as a grave ofense.-- +++$+++ As to your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGiorgioOrsini&diff=100918493&oldid=100441457 message], I would like to warn you that you are abusing your admin account rights. All my reverts are already covered by very extensive discussion on the talk pages. The point is - I've removed pseudo-historical claims : a) Kingdom of Croatia did not exts after being conquered by Hungarians 1189 - ask about it a qualified historian of the medieval Europe b) Clovio's Croatian origins is forgery coming from today's Croatia. The message, as left on my talk page I could understand only as a grave ofense.--[[User:GiorgioOrsini|Giorgio Orsini]] 03:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
535507 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535506 +++$+++ 535506 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.168961700E09 +++$+++ Care to explain me in what way I am \"abusing my powers\"? Forgive me if my words were harsh. You have basically been reverting on a serial basis for the last two weeks. Edit wars are disruptive by nature. It does not matter whether you think you are right or not. Please take a moment to familiarise yourself with the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution procedure]] which I recommend you follow. Please take such disputes to [[WP:RFC|requests for comment]], [[WP:RFM|requests for mediation]], or [[WP:RFAr|requests for arbitration]] rather than continuing to edit war. Regards,  +++$+++ :Care to explain me in what way I am "abusing my powers"? Forgive me if my words were harsh. You have basically been reverting on a serial basis for the last two weeks. Edit wars are disruptive by nature. It does not matter whether you think you are right or not. Please take a moment to familiarise yourself with the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution procedure]] which I recommend you follow. Please take such disputes to [[WP:RFC|requests for comment]], [[WP:RFM|requests for mediation]], or [[WP:RFAr|requests for arbitration]] rather than continuing to edit war. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 07:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

535509 +++$+++ Duja +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535509 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.169160240E09 +++$+++ Thanks. And, what about the [[Reflexive_verb#_ref-Davies_0|tidbit]] about \"he drowned\" not being reflexive in Spanish?  +++$+++ Thanks. And, what about the [[Reflexive_verb#_ref-Davies_0|tidbit]] about "he drowned" not being reflexive in Spanish? [[User:Duja|Duja]]<span style="font-size:70%;">[[User talk:Duja|►]]</span> 14:44, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
535510 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535509 +++$+++ 535509 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.169179200E09 +++$+++ This is a mistake, I think. In Spanish, ''to drown'' is said ''ahogar(se)'': \"Pedro se ahog\xf3\". It can be used in non-reflexive meaning as well: \"Pedro ahog\xf3 a la gata\". I think that it would be the same in Italian but Aldux should be able to confirm this.  +++$+++ :This is a mistake, I think. In Spanish, ''to drown'' is said ''ahogar(se)'': "Pedro se ahogó". It can be used in non-reflexive meaning as well: "Pedro ahogó a la gata". I think that it would be the same in Italian but Aldux should be able to confirm this. [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 20:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
535511 +++$+++ Duja +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535509 +++$+++ 535510 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.169183580E09 +++$+++ Oh well, I guess I'll have to find some Spanish\/Slavic bilingual to find a working example. Btw, I had no idea our language groups had so much similarity in this regard (French a bit less, AFAIK) before I started this research.  +++$+++ ::Oh well, I guess I'll have to find some Spanish/Slavic bilingual to find a working example. Btw, I had no idea our language groups had so much similarity in this regard (French a bit less, AFAIK) before I started this research. [[User:Duja|Duja]]<span style="font-size:70%;">[[User talk:Duja|►]]</span> 21:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

273368 +++$+++ Drzuckerman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-03 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.167832800E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for setting up the straw poll on the implant discussion page.  At this point 6 of the 7 most recent repeat discussion page contributors\/editors have voted for my version.  Droliver (the 7th) hasn't voted yet. I didn't count Curtis, who was on only once and seems to be in some kind of edit war with Jance.  Dikke hasn't voted either -- he was on one day and may be an administrator or a editor, I don't know. Of course, droliver may get friends to also vote with him.  Would that count as much as those who have been working on the compromise version for the past few weeks?  +++$+++ Thanks so much for setting up the straw poll on the implant discussion page.  At this point 6 of the 7 most recent repeat discussion page contributors/editors have voted for my version.  Droliver (the 7th) hasn't voted yet. I didn't count Curtis, who was on only once and seems to be in some kind of edit war with Jance.  Dikke hasn't voted either -- he was on one day and may be an administrator or a editor, I don't know. Of course, droliver may get friends to also vote with him.  Would that count as much as those who have been working on the compromise version for the past few weeks? [[User:Drzuckerman|Drzuckerman]] 06:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
273369 +++$+++ Droliver +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273368 +++$+++ 273368 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.167865260E09 +++$+++ so several obvious \"meat puppet\" votes, the vote of a moderator\/active participant (JANCE) of an internet discussion group alleging implants as toxic, and the vote of yourself, the world's most well-known activist on breast implants, are supposed to be representative of the editorial voice?  +++$+++ * so several obvious "meat puppet" votes, the vote of a moderator/active participant (JANCE) of an internet discussion group alleging implants as toxic, and the vote of yourself, the world's most well-known activist on breast implants, are supposed to be representative of the editorial voice? [[User:Droliver|Droliver]] 15:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

273371 +++$+++ Dario vet +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-04 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.167925800E09 +++$+++ please, you are a sysop, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Dario_vet&diff=98215825&oldid=98206916 look] before done a rollback, you can do errors!!! so if you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Dario_vet&oldid=98206916 see] the last version before your rb, there aren't any category in my page but only test, I copy the template test WITHOUT the category...-- +++$+++ please, you are a sysop, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dario_vet&diff=98215825&oldid=98206916 look] before done a rollback, you can do errors!!! so if you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dario_vet&oldid=98206916 see] the last version before your rb, there aren't any category in my page but only test, I copy the template test WITHOUT the category...--[[User:Dario vet|dario vet ^_^]] <small>([[User talk:Dario vet|talk]])</small> 07:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
273372 +++$+++ Dario vet +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273371 +++$+++ 273371 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.167932520E09 +++$+++ can I put [[User:Dario vet\/Sandbox|them]]? there are not a template but a personal user box create by me -- +++$+++ :can I put [[User:Dario vet/Sandbox|them]]? there are not a template but a personal user box create by me --[[User:Dario vet|dario vet ^_^]] <small>([[User talk:Dario vet|talk]])</small> 09:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

11228 +++$+++ AxelBoldt +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-21 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.185052260E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed that you work a lot on the article group [[Everleigh Club]], [[Minna Everleigh]] and [[Ada Everleigh]]. I just saw that a big chunk of the latter two articles is a copyright violation from [http:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/amex\/chicago\/peopleevents\/p_everleigh.html PBS], added by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Minna_Everleigh&diff=58246386&oldid=57444438 an anonymous user]. I didn't want to jump in, thinking that maybe you can better coordinate the three articles and rephrase whatever is important from the offending paragraphs. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi, I noticed that you work a lot on the article group [[Everleigh Club]], [[Minna Everleigh]] and [[Ada Everleigh]]. I just saw that a big chunk of the latter two articles is a copyright violation from [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/chicago/peopleevents/p_everleigh.html PBS], added by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Minna_Everleigh&diff=58246386&oldid=57444438 an anonymous user]. I didn't want to jump in, thinking that maybe you can better coordinate the three articles and rephrase whatever is important from the offending paragraphs. Cheers, [[User:AxelBoldt|AxelBoldt]] 14:11, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
11229 +++$+++ AxelBoldt +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11228 +++$+++ 11228 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.185074820E09 +++$+++ The article looks very good now, thanks!  +++$+++ :The article looks very good now, thanks! [[User:AxelBoldt|AxelBoldt]] 20:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
11230 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11228 +++$+++ 11228 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.185580860E09 +++$+++ You are still making assumptions about how Book interprets Christian teachings. Whedon very deliberately kept the details about what a \"Shepherd\" does or believes ambiguous. Your bald assertion added nothing useful to the article. -- +++$+++ :You are still making assumptions about how Book interprets Christian teachings. Whedon very deliberately kept the details about what a "Shepherd" does or believes ambiguous. Your bald assertion added nothing useful to the article. --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]] 17:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
11231 +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11228 +++$+++ 11230 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.185581340E09 +++$+++ Based on the edit history, it is [[User:Melensdad|Melensdad]] and I left my explanation on [[User talk:Melensdad]], which is similar to what [[User:Orangemike|<font color=\"darkorange\">Orange Mike<\/font>]] wrote. +++$+++ ::Based on the edit history, it is [[User:Melensdad|Melensdad]] and I left my explanation on [[User talk:Melensdad]], which is similar to what [[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]] wrote.[[User:Shsilver|Shsilver]] 17:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

273374 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-05 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.168053000E09 +++$+++ How long must we wait for consensus?  The article is still locked in one version which only Oliver agreed with (although on the talk page he disagreed with Curtis' revisions).  Thank you. +++$+++ How long must we wait for consensus?  The article is still locked in one version which only Oliver agreed with (although on the talk page he disagreed with Curtis' revisions).  Thank you.[[User:Jance|Jance]] 19:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
273375 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273374 +++$+++ 273374 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.168075500E09 +++$+++ Would you answer this, please?  Thanks. +++$+++ :Would you answer this, please?  Thanks.[[User:Jance|Jance]] 01:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
273376 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273374 +++$+++ 273374 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.168117020E09 +++$+++ I was not harassing you.  I gave you no allotted time.  It was only a request.   +++$+++ :I was not harassing you.  I gave you no allotted time.  It was only a request.  [[User:Jance|Jance]] 12:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
273377 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273374 +++$+++ 273376 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.168139160E09 +++$+++ I am sorry you took it that way.  Perhaps I worded it badly.  I apologize if I did.  I only wanted a response.   I hope Clin-Med will see a need for balance.  I doubt that will happen, as Droliver has portrayed Drz and me as equivalent to the \"anti-vaccinationists\".  (I do not know the others, except I know who Dr. Melmed is) .   That said, my interest in this has greatly soured, as has my opinion of the \"MDs\" involved. I appreciate your help in this to date, particularly wrt civility.   +++$+++ ::I am sorry you took it that way.  Perhaps I worded it badly.  I apologize if I did.  I only wanted a response.   I hope Clin-Med will see a need for balance.  I doubt that will happen, as Droliver has portrayed Drz and me as equivalent to the "anti-vaccinationists".  (I do not know the others, except I know who Dr. Melmed is) .   That said, my interest in this has greatly soured, as has my opinion of the "MDs" involved. I appreciate your help in this to date, particularly wrt civility.  [[User:Jance|Jance]] 19:06, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
273378 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273374 +++$+++ 273377 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.168144440E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Sarah.  Sometimes Wiki reminds me of email, which can be misinterpreted - too often people write messages quickly, and the recipient can not interpret body language or get feedback via person-person contact.  I have learned to be careful (esp with business) via email, and I should apply that same lesson here. +++$+++ :::Thanks, Sarah.  Sometimes Wiki reminds me of email, which can be misinterpreted - too often people write messages quickly, and the recipient can not interpret body language or get feedback via person-person contact.  I have learned to be careful (esp with business) via email, and I should apply that same lesson here.[[User:Jance|Jance]] 20:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
273379 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273374 +++$+++ 273378 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.168152600E09 +++$+++ Did you find anyone there to be a meatpuppet?  \"for the purposes of influencing the community on a given issue or issues acting essentially as a puppet of the first user without having independent views and actual or potential contributions.\"? +++$+++ ::::Did you find anyone there to be a meatpuppet?  "for the purposes of influencing the community on a given issue or issues acting essentially as a puppet of the first user without having independent views and actual or potential contributions."?[[User:Jance|Jance]] 22:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
273380 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273374 +++$+++ 273378 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.168159380E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  I agree with your comments. +++$+++ ::::Thank you.  I agree with your comments.[[User:Jance|Jance]] 00:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

463013 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 463013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-07 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.265535600E09 +++$+++ Hello. Thank you for your message. I agree that [[Chi Theta Omega Fraternity]] is a candidate for A7 deletion. When I first read the article, I thought the Speedy tag was going to be A7. I'm going to nominate it now. \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ Hello. Thank you for your message. I agree that [[Chi Theta Omega Fraternity]] is a candidate for A7 deletion. When I first read the article, I thought the Speedy tag was going to be A7. I'm going to nominate it now. —&nbsp;[[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 01:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
463014 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 463013 +++$+++ 463013 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.265536200E09 +++$+++ Thanks  +++$+++ :Thanks [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 01:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

11234 +++$+++ Sterry2607 +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-31 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.185950760E09 +++$+++ Hi Shsilver, I notice you have removed this category that I created yesterday from some of the articles I added it to, including Flora Eldershaw who was one of the main reasons I created this category. You also removed it from Charmian Clift...and others. Can you please tell me why?  +++$+++ Hi Shsilver, I notice you have removed this category that I created yesterday from some of the articles I added it to, including Flora Eldershaw who was one of the main reasons I created this category. You also removed it from Charmian Clift...and others. Can you please tell me why? [[User:Sterry2607|Sterry2607]] 23:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
11235 +++$+++ Sterry2607 +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11234 +++$+++ 11234 +++$+++ 2007-08-01 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.185969120E09 +++$+++ Okey doke. I'm disappointed that you didn't discuss it with me first as I did think about the issue you've raised and felt the one heading could cover both. However, your point is a fair enough one, particularly given the number of articles that can be flagged with this category, so I think the best thing is to create a second heading for the collaborators as I've suggested on the Literary Collaboration talk page. I'll go ahead and do that, and reflag all the ones you removed from my initial category. I appreciate that it's difficult to manage these discussions when we are in different time zones, particularly when one is keen to get going on a task. I hope you agree with having two categories. Regards  +++$+++ : Okey doke. I'm disappointed that you didn't discuss it with me first as I did think about the issue you've raised and felt the one heading could cover both. However, your point is a fair enough one, particularly given the number of articles that can be flagged with this category, so I think the best thing is to create a second heading for the collaborators as I've suggested on the Literary Collaboration talk page. I'll go ahead and do that, and reflag all the ones you removed from my initial category. I appreciate that it's difficult to manage these discussions when we are in different time zones, particularly when one is keen to get going on a task. I hope you agree with having two categories. Regards [[User:Sterry2607|Sterry2607]] 04:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
11236 +++$+++ Sterry2607 +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11234 +++$+++ 11235 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.186038000E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I didn't notice that you had created it already. Thanks for that  +++$+++ :: Sorry, I didn't notice that you had created it already. Thanks for that [[User:Sterry2607|Sterry2607]] 00:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

11238 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-15 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.187161740E09 +++$+++ If you are online you can make the first edit at [[Lincoln Towing Service]].  Make one similar to the first one at [[South side (Chicago)]] last week with a similar edit summary.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ If you are online you can make the first edit at [[Lincoln Towing Service]].  Make one similar to the first one at [[South side (Chicago)]] last week with a similar edit summary.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 00:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
11239 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11238 +++$+++ 11238 +++$+++ 2007-08-15 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.187161920E09 +++$+++ I am telling you this because many people like to keep track of articles that they created.  Since it was your nominee, if you start it before I get around to it you can be the creator as you should be.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :I am telling you this because many people like to keep track of articles that they created.  Since it was your nominee, if you start it before I get around to it you can be the creator as you should be.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 00:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
11240 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11238 +++$+++ 11239 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.187389860E09 +++$+++ I don't see much more to add to [[Lincoln Towing Service]].  If you think we might do better spending the rest of the week on the runner up you can make the change at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago\/COTW\/Current]].  Since according to the [[WP:CHICOTW]] rules, you are the only person with the power to make such a decision it is your choice.  You have until the end of the day (UTC).  If you think there may be more info out there on this private company we can stick with it.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::I don't see much more to add to [[Lincoln Towing Service]].  If you think we might do better spending the rest of the week on the runner up you can make the change at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/COTW/Current]].  Since according to the [[WP:CHICOTW]] rules, you are the only person with the power to make such a decision it is your choice.  You have until the end of the day (UTC).  If you think there may be more info out there on this private company we can stick with it.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 15:31, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
11241 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11238 +++$+++ 11240 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.187401320E09 +++$+++ I don't know how to add much more myself.  If you think others may be able to help then keep it.  We have certainly had worse [[WP:CHICOTW]] improvements.  I know I could add a lot more to the runner up now, but every winner has the right to command attention for a whole week.  It is your call.  I will be disappointed if the rest of the week is wasted, but there is no demand that the article be changed.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :::I don't know how to add much more myself.  If you think others may be able to help then keep it.  We have certainly had worse [[WP:CHICOTW]] improvements.  I know I could add a lot more to the runner up now, but every winner has the right to command attention for a whole week.  It is your call.  I will be disappointed if the rest of the week is wasted, but there is no demand that the article be changed.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 18:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
11242 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11238 +++$+++ 11241 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.187600520E09 +++$+++ It's too late now for us to give another article justice.  We'll just let it ride.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ ::::It's too late now for us to give another article justice.  We'll just let it ride.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 02:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

535528 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.169607480E09 +++$+++ I'd appreciate a second opinion, as not completely familiar with his editing patterns. See [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#User:Bosniak again?]] Thanks,  +++$+++ I'd appreciate a second opinion, as not completely familiar with his editing patterns. See [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Bosniak again?]] Thanks, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 18:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
535529 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535528 +++$+++ 535528 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.169609460E09 +++$+++ I responded on AN\/I; I think there's sufficient evidence here to justify a checkuser. --  +++$+++ :I responded on AN/I; I think there's sufficient evidence here to justify a checkuser. -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 19:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

273387 +++$+++ OngBS +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-09 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.168345740E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah - the vandal [[User:Wenfangs|Wenfangs]] has struck a second time - this time adding not one, but THREE tags (sprotected, unreferenced, inappropriate tone) to [[Fann Wong]].  Coincidentally, these are the tags on [[Zoe Tay]] as well.  If you check the user's talk page, it seems to confirm that he\/she is indeed a fan of [[Zoe Tay|Zoe]] - which comports with my initial hypothesis that the user is extremely disgruntled with the fact that he\/she has been repeatedly blocked from editing his\/her idol's article, thereby leading him\/her to vandalise [[Fann Wong]].  +++$+++ Hi Sarah - the vandal [[User:Wenfangs|Wenfangs]] has struck a second time - this time adding not one, but THREE tags (sprotected, unreferenced, inappropriate tone) to [[Fann Wong]].  Coincidentally, these are the tags on [[Zoe Tay]] as well.  If you check the user's talk page, it seems to confirm that he/she is indeed a fan of [[Zoe Tay|Zoe]] - which comports with my initial hypothesis that the user is extremely disgruntled with the fact that he/she has been repeatedly blocked from editing his/her idol's article, thereby leading him/her to vandalise [[Fann Wong]]. [[User:OngBS|OngBS]] 04:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
273388 +++$+++ OngBS +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273387 +++$+++ 273387 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.168348800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your prompt action!  +++$+++ :Thanks for your prompt action! [[User:OngBS|OngBS]] 05:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

273390 +++$+++ Nilfanion +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-09 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.168412460E09 +++$+++ | style=\"background-color: #e8ffff; padding: 1em; border: solid 1px darkcyan;\" | Thank you for your support in my [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Nilfanion|my RfA]], which passed with a tally of '''117\/0\/1'''. I hope that my conduct as an [[WP:ADMIN|admin]] lives up to the somewhat flattering confidence the community has shown in me. I find it <small>slightly<\/small> amusing that I receive a good luck message on this [[111 (number)#In other fields|particular number]] support, hopefully it won't curse me like the England cricket team; and I go to show your confidence in me is well founded. Please don't hesitate to leave a message on [[User talk:Nilfanion|my talk page]] should you need anything or want to discuss something with me.-- +++$+++ | style="background-color: #e8ffff; padding: 1em; border: solid 1px darkcyan;" | Thank you for your support in my [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nilfanion|my RfA]], which passed with a tally of '''117/0/1'''. I hope that my conduct as an [[WP:ADMIN|admin]] lives up to the somewhat flattering confidence the community has shown in me. I find it <small>slightly</small> amusing that I receive a good luck message on this [[111 (number)#In other fields|particular number]] support, hopefully it won't curse me like the England cricket team; and I go to show your confidence in me is well founded. Please don't hesitate to leave a message on [[User talk:Nilfanion|my talk page]] should you need anything or want to discuss something with me.--[[User:Nilfanion|Nilf]][[commons:User:Nilfanion|anion]] ([[User talk:Nilfanion|talk]]) 23:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
273391 +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273390 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.168478940E09 +++$+++ Unrelated... please see your email. \/\/ <B> +++$+++ **Unrelated... please see your email. // <B>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</B><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 17:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
273392 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273390 +++$+++ 273390 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.168572600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your discussion and agreeing to re-appraise your position.  Unfortunately it never happened and it wouldn't have made any difference!  I hope I can continue to contribute here in a way that doesn't disappoint you and in a manner that may result in you supporting me in a future attempt at RFA.  Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your discussion and agreeing to re-appraise your position.  Unfortunately it never happened and it wouldn't have made any difference!  I hope I can continue to contribute here in a way that doesn't disappoint you and in a manner that may result in you supporting me in a future attempt at RFA.  Thanks again. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] 19:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

11247 +++$+++ Sopoforic +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-23 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.187904480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for notifying me as well; I've got the page watchlisted, but it's easy for things to slip by even so. -- +++$+++ Thanks for notifying me as well; I've got the page watchlisted, but it's easy for things to slip by even so. --[[User:Sopoforic|Sopoforic]] 14:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
11248 +++$+++ Bearian +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11247 +++$+++ 11247 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.188007080E09 +++$+++ Great job on saving this article.  +++$+++ :Great job on saving this article. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] 18:58, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

613544 +++$+++ Pencefn +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-14 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.234646340E09 +++$+++ Your thoughts? -- +++$+++ Your thoughts? --[[User:Pencefn|Stewart]]<small><font color="maroon"><sup> '''([[User talk:Pencefn#top|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Pencefn|edits]])'''</sup></font></small> 13:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
613545 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613544 +++$+++ 613544 +++$+++ 2009-02-14 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.234675380E09 +++$+++ From a look over his contribs they're not particularly bad, more treating WP as a social site, but there's little sign of them being constructive, and a couple of hints of the old obsession with flag icons. I don't feel inclined to block right away, but suspect it won't last and would block on any repeat of the old bad behaviour. The fiddling around with the user pages of these blocked accounts suggests they may be his, but nothing conclusive. .  +++$+++ :From a look over his contribs they're not particularly bad, more treating WP as a social site, but there's little sign of them being constructive, and a couple of hints of the old obsession with flag icons. I don't feel inclined to block right away, but suspect it won't last and would block on any repeat of the old bad behaviour. The fiddling around with the user pages of these blocked accounts suggests they may be his, but nothing conclusive. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
613546 +++$+++ Filper01 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613544 +++$+++ 613545 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.234745340E09 +++$+++ I really hope I'm not blocked. <font face=\"Times New Roman\"> +++$+++ ::I really hope I'm not blocked. <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Filper01|<font color="red">'''Filper01'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Filper01|<font color="yellow">'''Chat'''</font>]], [[Special:Contributions/Filper01|<font color="purple">'''My contribs'''</font>]])</font> 16:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
613547 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613544 +++$+++ 613546 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.234748460E09 +++$+++ Hi, Fila. I really hope you do constructive work to improve articles, cutting down on fiddling about with flag icons without giving good reasons, always taking care to provide proper [[WP:V|verification]] from reliable sources of any changes you make, and behave politely and civilly to other editors. If you disagree with someone, accept that they may well be right and look for sources of objective evidence, don't just argue. And remember to give a useful edit summary all the time, not just on odd occasions as at present. That'll help. .  +++$+++ :::Hi, Fila. I really hope you do constructive work to improve articles, cutting down on fiddling about with flag icons without giving good reasons, always taking care to provide proper [[WP:V|verification]] from reliable sources of any changes you make, and behave politely and civilly to other editors. If you disagree with someone, accept that they may well be right and look for sources of objective evidence, don't just argue. And remember to give a useful edit summary all the time, not just on odd occasions as at present. That'll help. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:41, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
613548 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613544 +++$+++ 613544 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.234722420E09 +++$+++ As you'll appreciate, the section also includes audiobooks. It complies with [[WP:FURTHER]], and the reason for not having ''External links'' as the last section is that it includes templates providing a large number of internal links. Perhaps something to discuss on the article talk page. . .  +++$+++ :As you'll appreciate, the section also includes audiobooks. It complies with [[WP:FURTHER]], and the reason for not having ''External links'' as the last section is that it includes templates providing a large number of internal links. Perhaps something to discuss on the article talk page. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 10:27, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
613549 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613544 +++$+++ 613544 +++$+++ 2009-02-18 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.235022300E09 +++$+++ Thanks! A very pleasant surprise, much appreciated. .  +++$+++ :Thanks! A very pleasant surprise, much appreciated. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

11250 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-29 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.188370920E09 +++$+++ Feel free to start Patrick Nash when you get a chance.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ Feel free to start Patrick Nash when you get a chance.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 00:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
11251 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11250 +++$+++ 11250 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.188374760E09 +++$+++ I think the prior [[WP:CSD]] was another [[Patrick Nash]].  Go ahead and recreate over this page.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :I think the prior [[WP:CSD]] was another [[Patrick Nash]].  Go ahead and recreate over this page.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 01:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

535540 +++$+++ Nareklm +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535540 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-30 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.170217020E09 +++$+++ Wow i really feel stupid lol, thanks for the notification :)  +++$+++ Wow i really feel stupid lol, thanks for the notification :) [[User:Nareklm|<font color="#0099FF">Nareklm</font>]] 20:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
535541 +++$+++ Nareklm +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535540 +++$+++ 535540 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.170218220E09 +++$+++ Thanks goes for you to! :-)  +++$+++ :Thanks goes for you to! :-) [[User:Nareklm|<font color="#0099FF">Nareklm</font>]] 20:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

273399 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273399 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-16 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.168998660E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah.  I created an AfD on this artilce.  Would you take a look please, and tell me if it is okay?  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Jim_Shapiro].  I am not sure I did everything necessary.  Thank you! +++$+++ Hi Sarah.  I created an AfD on this artilce.  Would you take a look please, and tell me if it is okay?  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jim_Shapiro].  I am not sure I did everything necessary.  Thank you![[User:Jance|Jance]] 17:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
273400 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273399 +++$+++ 273399 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.169001780E09 +++$+++ Do editors ever read the sources before 'voting' on an AfD?  Would you please come state your position on this? +++$+++ :Do editors ever read the sources before 'voting' on an AfD?  Would you please come state your position on this?[[User:Jance|Jance]] 18:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

535544 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-03 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.170501540E09 +++$+++ It seems worth pointing out how easily names can be changed and that no one is necessarily accusing them of bad faith... <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ It seems worth pointing out how easily names can be changed and that no one is necessarily accusing them of bad faith... <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WJB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|''scribe'']]</span> 03:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
535545 +++$+++ Benedict the Moor +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535544 +++$+++ 535544 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.170683940E09 +++$+++ Along the same line of thought, I've created a followup, {{tl|UsernameAllowed}}, to tell the user if the discussion was closed in his favor. Otherwise, the first notice would linger on, still saying the issue is in doubt, still pointing to a discussion that isn't there any more.  Please consider this a \"matching bookend\": the two templates indicate the beginning and (favorable) end of the RFC\/NAME.  Thanks!  +++$+++ :Along the same line of thought, I've created a followup, {{tl|UsernameAllowed}}, to tell the user if the discussion was closed in his favor. Otherwise, the first notice would linger on, still saying the issue is in doubt, still pointing to a discussion that isn't there any more.  Please consider this a "matching bookend": the two templates indicate the beginning and (favorable) end of the RFC/NAME.  Thanks! [[User:Benedict the Moor|Ben]] 05:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
535546 +++$+++ Benedict the Moor +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535544 +++$+++ 535544 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.170752340E09 +++$+++ And another new template, {{tl|UsernameConcern}}, to begin discussion directly with the user '''before''' going to RFC\/NAME, for those of us too harried and\/or tired to type up a long and diplomatic note by hand.  +++$+++ :And another new template, {{tl|UsernameConcern}}, to begin discussion directly with the user '''before''' going to RFC/NAME, for those of us too harried and/or tired to type up a long and diplomatic note by hand. [[User:Benedict the Moor|Ben]] 00:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

526164 +++$+++ Mboverload +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-06 06:08:00 +++$+++ 1.154869680E09 +++$+++ User is stealing pictures from Getty and massuploading them to Wikipedia.  Please delete and give warning. http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Spinster678  -- +++$+++ User is stealing pictures from Getty and massuploading them to Wikipedia.  Please delete and give warning. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Spinster678  --[[User:Mboverload|mboverload]][[Special:Emailuser/Mboverload|<font color="red">@</font>]] 06:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
526165 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526164 +++$+++ 526164 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.154873220E09 +++$+++ Matter has been addressed.  Thanks for the heads up. &mdash;  +++$+++ * Matter has been addressed.  Thanks for the heads up. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 07:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

11258 +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.190331960E09 +++$+++ Once Rob Morrow left Northern Exposure, he did not return.  He gave notice before the sixth season and they wrote him out in a lengthy story arc that lasted until about the seventh episode from the end.  The series finale, the episode called \"Tranquillity Base\" was a single episode and not originally intended as a series finale.  It was slightly re-edited (and Morrow did not appear in it) once they found out they they had not been picked up for a seventh season.  +++$+++ Once Rob Morrow left Northern Exposure, he did not return.  He gave notice before the sixth season and they wrote him out in a lengthy story arc that lasted until about the seventh episode from the end.  The series finale, the episode called "Tranquillity Base" was a single episode and not originally intended as a series finale.  It was slightly re-edited (and Morrow did not appear in it) once they found out they they had not been picked up for a seventh season. [[User:Shsilver|Shsilver]] 16:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
11259 +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11258 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.190332440E09 +++$+++ Positive.  Watched all of them earlier this year.  The final episode is set in Maurice's lodge and ends with Maggie showing up and hooking up with Chris Stevens after she decided not to go off to visit Mike Monroe. +++$+++ ::Positive.  Watched all of them earlier this year.  The final episode is set in Maurice's lodge and ends with Maggie showing up and hooking up with Chris Stevens after she decided not to go off to visit Mike Monroe.[[User:Shsilver|Shsilver]] 16:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
11260 +++$+++ The Parsnip! +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11258 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.190332560E09 +++$+++ YES! You're right, now I remember. I forgot about the Maggie and Chris thing. I must be thinking of the mid season when Morrow left and they needed to write him out.  +++$+++ :::YES! You're right, now I remember. I forgot about the Maggie and Chris thing. I must be thinking of the mid season when Morrow left and they needed to write him out. [[User:The Parsnip!|The Parsnip!]] 16:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

535547 +++$+++ 89.172.230.220 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.170986580E09 +++$+++ I am wondering what can someone do to stop vandalising and propaganist revisionism on Wikipedia? Currently there are a number of Italian users ([[User:Giovanni Giove]] and [[User:GiorgioOrsini]]), among them even a moderator ([[User:Aldux]]), who constantly revert and have reverted and prevented others to remove their falsifictions with the help of the mentioned moderator. Their target: medieval, baroque and renaissance Croatian writers, philosophers, scientists, etc. from Venetian Dalmatia have been stripped of their Croatian notes and identities in Wiki articles. These people lived in bilingual society where one had two and somtimes even three or more versions of their name: Croatian, Venetian (Italian) and Latin most commonly. You can find examples of such reverts all over the place: [[Benedetto Cotrugli]], [[Francesco Patrizi]], [[Stjepan Gradi\u0107]], [[Joakim Stulli]], [[Republic of Ragusa]], [[Ivan Lu\u010di\u0107]], [[Giovanni Luppis]], [[List of Croats]], [[Andrea Meldolla]], [[Ivan Duknovi\u0107]], [[Juraj Dalmatinac]], etc. , etc....it's getting ridiculous and no one is doing anything about it. Are Italians allowed to do rewrite history to their wishes?!  -- +++$+++ I am wondering what can someone do to stop vandalising and propaganist revisionism on Wikipedia? Currently there are a number of Italian users ([[User:Giovanni Giove]] and [[User:GiorgioOrsini]]), among them even a moderator ([[User:Aldux]]), who constantly revert and have reverted and prevented others to remove their falsifictions with the help of the mentioned moderator. Their target: medieval, baroque and renaissance Croatian writers, philosophers, scientists, etc. from Venetian Dalmatia have been stripped of their Croatian notes and identities in Wiki articles. These people lived in bilingual society where one had two and somtimes even three or more versions of their name: Croatian, Venetian (Italian) and Latin most commonly. You can find examples of such reverts all over the place: [[Benedetto Cotrugli]], [[Francesco Patrizi]], [[Stjepan Gradić]], [[Joakim Stulli]], [[Republic of Ragusa]], [[Ivan Lučić]], [[Giovanni Luppis]], [[List of Croats]], [[Andrea Meldolla]], [[Ivan Duknović]], [[Juraj Dalmatinac]], etc. , etc....it's getting ridiculous and no one is doing anything about it. Are Italians allowed to do rewrite history to their wishes?!  --[[User:89.172.230.220|89.172.230.220]] 18:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
535548 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535547 +++$+++ 535547 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.171001760E09 +++$+++ Just to inform ya, Asterion, this is [[User:Afrika paprika]]. -- +++$+++ :Just to inform ya, Asterion, this is [[User:Afrika paprika]]. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 22:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
535549 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535547 +++$+++ 535548 +++$+++ 2007-02-14 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.171506720E09 +++$+++ Just a quick answer. I will try to look into this later on. First, I do not think Aldux is doing anything else but enforcing the community ban. Second, I have warned [[User:GiorgioOrsini]] in the past and will be keeping a close eye on him indeed. Third, I suggest you try to appeal your ban as it is wikipedia policy to revert any edits by banned users, independently of whether you think these are legit or not. Regards, -- +++$+++ ::Just a quick answer. I will try to look into this later on. First, I do not think Aldux is doing anything else but enforcing the community ban. Second, I have warned [[User:GiorgioOrsini]] in the past and will be keeping a close eye on him indeed. Third, I suggest you try to appeal your ban as it is wikipedia policy to revert any edits by banned users, independently of whether you think these are legit or not. Regards, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 18:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

273406 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273406 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.169119560E09 +++$+++ To see a comment without Wikilinks.  Sometimes I think Wikilinks are used as weapons.  And sometimes I prefer English.  ;-)  +++$+++ To see a comment without Wikilinks.  Sometimes I think Wikilinks are used as weapons.  And sometimes I prefer English.  ;-) [[User:Jance|Jance]] 03:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
273407 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273406 +++$+++ 273406 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.169121060E09 +++$+++ I am really getting off this computer tonight.  Cheers!   +++$+++ :I am really getting off this computer tonight.  Cheers!  [[User:Jance|Jance]] 03:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

535551 +++$+++ Toniher +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535551 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-13 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.171400460E09 +++$+++ Hi Asterion, according to your comments: \xabThis is a country main article. having an extra side infobox (i.e. Catalan world) is bad practice and clearly disruptive. Feel free to create a footnote template as <nowiki>{{Latin Europe}}<\/nowiki>)\xbb Simply for reference, before further discussion, would you have any reference about that from within Wikipedia?  +++$+++ Hi Asterion, according to your comments: «This is a country main article. having an extra side infobox (i.e. Catalan world) is bad practice and clearly disruptive. Feel free to create a footnote template as <nowiki>{{Latin Europe}}</nowiki>)» Simply for reference, before further discussion, would you have any reference about that from within Wikipedia? [[User:Toniher|Toniher]] 13:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
535552 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535551 +++$+++ 535551 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.171429920E09 +++$+++ Just have a look at [[USA]], [[Canada]] or [[Australia]] and you would realise there is no more than a single infobox, i.e. no such a thing as a generic English-speaking countries side-infobox. Regards,  +++$+++ :Just have a look at [[USA]], [[Canada]] or [[Australia]] and you would realise there is no more than a single infobox, i.e. no such a thing as a generic English-speaking countries side-infobox. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 21:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

273408 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-19 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.169194860E09 +++$+++ Would you mind weighing in again on the AfD, since Tyrenius claims your 'delete' vote applied only to WAS' version?  Even if you think the article as it stands now should be kept, at least we would know.  Thanks. +++$+++ Would you mind weighing in again on the AfD, since Tyrenius claims your 'delete' vote applied only to WAS' version?  Even if you think the article as it stands now should be kept, at least we would know.  Thanks.[[User:Jance|Jance]] 00:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
273409 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273408 +++$+++ 273408 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.169198460E09 +++$+++ I see.  Thanks.  I have posted on \"Jimbo's\" talkpage asking about Wikipedia's position on borderline notability and BLP.  I also explained my feeling about the behavior of both the author and of Tyrneius.  +++$+++ :I see.  Thanks.  I have posted on "Jimbo's" talkpage asking about Wikipedia's position on borderline notability and BLP.  I also explained my feeling about the behavior of both the author and of Tyrneius. [[User:Jance|Jance]] 01:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
273410 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273408 +++$+++ 273409 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.169198700E09 +++$+++ So is your \"vote\" on your version neutral, or delete?  I gather it is neutral at this point?  Also, is there a Wiki edit code page?  I do not know how to cross out.  Is there a rule about changing one's own edit to correct it?  Thanks +++$+++ ::So is your "vote" on your version neutral, or delete?  I gather it is neutral at this point?  Also, is there a Wiki edit code page?  I do not know how to cross out.  Is there a rule about changing one's own edit to correct it?  Thanks[[User:Jance|Jance]] 01:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

535553 +++$+++ Osli73 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535553 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-14 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.171491420E09 +++$+++ Sincere regards  +++$+++ Sincere regards [[User:Osli73|Osli73]] 14:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
535554 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535553 +++$+++ 535553 +++$+++ 2007-02-14 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.171506300E09 +++$+++ I am not really sure what could be done. I think the best place to start would be [[WP:AN]], where you could explain the situation in the same way you have done to me. I have actually mentioned this relatively recently when discussiong  [[User:Bosniak]]'s recent misconduct (i.e. that it should also be applied equally if the arbcom decision where to be interpreted broadly). Regards, -- +++$+++ :I am not really sure what could be done. I think the best place to start would be [[WP:AN]], where you could explain the situation in the same way you have done to me. I have actually mentioned this relatively recently when discussiong  [[User:Bosniak]]'s recent misconduct (i.e. that it should also be applied equally if the arbcom decision where to be interpreted broadly). Regards, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 18:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

11266 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-25 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.193372580E09 +++$+++ Please visit [[Talk:Lincoln Towing Service]] to assist with the GA on hold effort.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ Please visit [[Talk:Lincoln Towing Service]] to assist with the GA on hold effort.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 21:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
11267 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11266 +++$+++ 11266 +++$+++ 2007-10-29 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.193697720E09 +++$+++ Just a reminder.  We only have 3 days left.  I may not have time to get to any of the issues so it is likely to fail if someone else does not attend to the problems.  I was hoping you would have an interest because you had nominated this article and been heavily involved in the editing.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :Just a reminder.  We only have 3 days left.  I may not have time to get to any of the issues so it is likely to fail if someone else does not attend to the problems.  I was hoping you would have an interest because you had nominated this article and been heavily involved in the editing.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[ User:TonyTheTiger/WPChiDirector |tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM]]) </small> 15:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

535556 +++$+++ Bladestorm +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-15 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.171604640E09 +++$+++ <br\/>You ''do'' realize that's entirely false, right? His talk page has been \"protected\" (ie. hushed). As such, he doesn't have the option of requesting an unblock via that method, does he?  +++$+++ <br/>You ''do'' realize that's entirely false, right? His talk page has been "protected" (ie. hushed). As such, he doesn't have the option of requesting an unblock via that method, does he? [[User:Bladestorm|Bladestorm]] 21:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
535557 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535556 +++$+++ 535556 +++$+++ 2007-02-15 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.171606140E09 +++$+++ I was merely informing the user of the indefinite block as per [[WP:AN\/I]]. I suggest you take up the talkpage protection with the admin who enforced it. Thanks, -- +++$+++ :I was merely informing the user of the indefinite block as per [[WP:AN/I]]. I suggest you take up the talkpage protection with the admin who enforced it. Thanks, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 22:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
535558 +++$+++ Bladestorm +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535556 +++$+++ 535557 +++$+++ 2007-02-15 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.171609740E09 +++$+++ I'm not saying the page needs to be unprotected. I'm just saying that only accurate information should be added.  +++$+++ ::I'm not saying the page needs to be unprotected. I'm just saying that only accurate information should be added. [[User:Bladestorm|Bladestorm]] 23:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

535559 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.171613760E09 +++$+++ Hi Asterion. I see you are both Andalusian and a civil wikipedian so I thought it was good to check this with you first: in the Spain main article, the Languages section has Andalusian dialect included. I feel like this doesn't belong ''in that context''. So, don't get me wrong, not that I am denying that may be important for some but I think is overstating its importance to display it in the Spanish languages section. I'd go and remove it but, just in case you added it or just have a different opinion, I would like to hear it. Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi Asterion. I see you are both Andalusian and a civil wikipedian so I thought it was good to check this with you first: in the Spain main article, the Languages section has Andalusian dialect included. I feel like this doesn't belong ''in that context''. So, don't get me wrong, not that I am denying that may be important for some but I think is overstating its importance to display it in the Spanish languages section. I'd go and remove it but, just in case you added it or just have a different opinion, I would like to hear it. Thanks! [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] 00:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
535560 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535559 +++$+++ 535559 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.172017260E09 +++$+++ I will remove it. Feel free to restore if you don't agree.  +++$+++ :I will remove it. Feel free to restore if you don't agree. [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] | [[User talk:Mountolive|Talk]] 16:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
535561 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535559 +++$+++ 535560 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.172031600E09 +++$+++ Apologies for the delay. I have been quite busy lately. I have no strong feelings about it but think it would be best if a note is left in the article talk page beforehand requesting comments from other editors. Thanks, -- +++$+++ ::Apologies for the delay. I have been quite busy lately. I have no strong feelings about it but think it would be best if a note is left in the article talk page beforehand requesting comments from other editors. Thanks, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 20:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
535562 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535559 +++$+++ 535561 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.172035680E09 +++$+++ No problem at all with the delay. While not denying the differences, I just thought that it didn't belong in the main article, not even in the relevant section which, in my opinion, should be more focused in \"proper\" languages (if you asked me whether \"Asturian\" or \"Aragonese\" are proper languages...I'd better keep my mouth shut). There has been some cleaning up effort in the article lately and I think is a good idea try to reduce content there and redirect it to more relevant articles. Besides, I am guessin that \"andaluz\" in Almer\xeda is quite different from \"andaluz\" in Seville and the same say between C\xe1diz and Ja\xe9n, in other words, this info is best explained in detail in the relevant article, instead of presenting a bulk info in the main article. Anyway, it seems we are fine with this. Thanks for the feedback  +++$+++ :::No problem at all with the delay. While not denying the differences, I just thought that it didn't belong in the main article, not even in the relevant section which, in my opinion, should be more focused in "proper" languages (if you asked me whether "Asturian" or "Aragonese" are proper languages...I'd better keep my mouth shut). There has been some cleaning up effort in the article lately and I think is a good idea try to reduce content there and redirect it to more relevant articles. Besides, I am guessin that "andaluz" in Almería is quite different from "andaluz" in Seville and the same say between Cádiz and Jaén, in other words, this info is best explained in detail in the relevant article, instead of presenting a bulk info in the main article. Anyway, it seems we are fine with this. Thanks for the feedback [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] | [[User talk:Mountolive|Talk]] 21:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
535563 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535559 +++$+++ 535562 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.172035980E09 +++$+++ Yes, this seems to be a common problem with Spain-related articles. People just try to fit everything in the main one instead of starting individual ones and adding a link back. Hopefully if the Spain Wikiproject takes off the situation will improve. Best wishes, -- +++$+++ ::::Yes, this seems to be a common problem with Spain-related articles. People just try to fit everything in the main one instead of starting individual ones and adding a link back. Hopefully if the Spain Wikiproject takes off the situation will improve. Best wishes, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 21:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
535564 +++$+++ Balancer +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535559 +++$+++ 535559 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.171871520E09 +++$+++ I've C&Ped the statements from the RfA to [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington (2nd RfC)]] on the basis that there seems to be agreement that the issue should be taken up in RfC. You may wish to ratify, modify, withdraw, etc your statement if you have made one, or add a statement if you have not.  +++$+++ *I've C&Ped the statements from the RfA to [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington (2nd RfC)]] on the basis that there seems to be agreement that the issue should be taken up in RfC. You may wish to ratify, modify, withdraw, etc your statement if you have made one, or add a statement if you have not. [[User:Balancer|Balancer]] 23:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

611408 +++$+++ WereSpielChequers +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-02 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.299101040E09 +++$+++ Hi. nice charts you've added at [[WP:EDITS]], I've moved them slightly and it would be helpful to add a date in the captions. However I suspect the Pie slices are wrong. The editors in the 3001 to 4,000 group all have roughly  11,000 to 14,000 edits, whilst the 2001 - 3,000 group have between 14 and 20 thousand. So the pie slice for the 3001 to 4,000 group must be more than half the size of the 2001 - 3,000 group. I suspect the ratio is closer to 5-7 but your pie chart is more like 1-7. Would you mind checking that your systems successfully loaded all 4,000 records and didn't some how discard the editors who were between circa 3,200 and 4,000 on the list? Thanks '' +++$+++ Hi. nice charts you've added at [[WP:EDITS]], I've moved them slightly and it would be helpful to add a date in the captions. However I suspect the Pie slices are wrong. The editors in the 3001 to 4,000 group all have roughly  11,000 to 14,000 edits, whilst the 2001 - 3,000 group have between 14 and 20 thousand. So the pie slice for the 3001 to 4,000 group must be more than half the size of the 2001 - 3,000 group. I suspect the ratio is closer to 5-7 but your pie chart is more like 1-7. Would you mind checking that your systems successfully loaded all 4,000 records and didn't some how discard the editors who were between circa 3,200 and 4,000 on the list? Thanks ''[[User:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkGreen">Ϣere</span>]][[User talk:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkRed">Spiel</span>]]<span style="color:DarkOrange">Chequers''</span> 13:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
611409 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611408 +++$+++ 611408 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.299112200E09 +++$+++ I don't think we're missing anyone there. I basically added up all the numbers in an Excel spreadsheet and came up with the results. It's actually incredibly easy to do so anyone can check me on it. I do think the numbers are correct though because in two weeks, the highest group added something like a million and a half edits, which is quite impressive in its own right. In terms of the captions, I will update the graph the next time the numbers come out so that there is a better number spread. If you want to add up the numbers, I used MZM's spread.  +++$+++ :I don't think we're missing anyone there. I basically added up all the numbers in an Excel spreadsheet and came up with the results. It's actually incredibly easy to do so anyone can check me on it. I do think the numbers are correct though because in two weeks, the highest group added something like a million and a half edits, which is quite impressive in its own right. In terms of the captions, I will update the graph the next time the numbers come out so that there is a better number spread. If you want to add up the numbers, I used MZM's spread. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 16:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
611410 +++$+++ WereSpielChequers +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611408 +++$+++ 611409 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.299118680E09 +++$+++ Hi Kevin, I have checked it, and I'm sure your figures are out when I check the 3rd and 4th tranches. '' +++$+++ ::Hi Kevin, I have checked it, and I'm sure your figures are out when I check the 3rd and 4th tranches. ''[[User:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkGreen">Ϣere</span>]][[User talk:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkRed">Spiel</span>]]<span style="color:DarkOrange">Chequers''</span> 18:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
611411 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611408 +++$+++ 611410 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.299119580E09 +++$+++ Are you saying they're off or correct, I'm now confused. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::Are you saying they're off or correct, I'm now confused. Thanks. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 18:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
611412 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611408 +++$+++ 611410 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.299119640E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'll check now.  +++$+++ :::Okay, I'll check now. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 18:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
611413 +++$+++ WereSpielChequers +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611408 +++$+++ 611412 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.299191400E09 +++$+++ Thanks, the other three tranches looked right to me, so it may just be an error in that fourth tranche. '' +++$+++ ::::Thanks, the other three tranches looked right to me, so it may just be an error in that fourth tranche. ''[[User:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkGreen">Ϣere</span>]][[User talk:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkRed">Spiel</span>]]<span style="color:DarkOrange">Chequers''</span> 14:30, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
611414 +++$+++ WereSpielChequers +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611408 +++$+++ 611413 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.299274380E09 +++$+++ Thanks, the new charts look OK to me. It would be nice to add dates and if you update them again, perhaps after we add the 4001-5000 range, I was wondering if you could do a separate pie slice for bot edits? '' +++$+++ :::::Thanks, the new charts look OK to me. It would be nice to add dates and if you update them again, perhaps after we add the 4001-5000 range, I was wondering if you could do a separate pie slice for bot edits? ''[[User:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkGreen">Ϣere</span>]][[User talk:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkRed">Spiel</span>]]<span style="color:DarkOrange">Chequers''</span> 13:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
611415 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611408 +++$+++ 611414 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.299278640E09 +++$+++ I could, and yes I really left a lot of this open for the fact that I'm hoping we'll add those remaining souls someday.  +++$+++ ::::::I could, and yes I really left a lot of this open for the fact that I'm hoping we'll add those remaining souls someday. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 14:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
611416 +++$+++ WereSpielChequers +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611408 +++$+++ 611415 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.299280320E09 +++$+++ OK I think the transclusion model gives us the potential to extend the list quite radically, though I may be quite incremental in doing this. I also think we need to publicise this via the signpost so as to give people the chance to opt out before we extend it. Any objection to my including your graphs in a signpost article? '' +++$+++ :::::::OK I think the transclusion model gives us the potential to extend the list quite radically, though I may be quite incremental in doing this. I also think we need to publicise this via the signpost so as to give people the chance to opt out before we extend it. Any objection to my including your graphs in a signpost article? ''[[User:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkGreen">Ϣere</span>]][[User talk:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkRed">Spiel</span>]]<span style="color:DarkOrange">Chequers''</span> 15:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
611417 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611408 +++$+++ 611416 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.299291840E09 +++$+++ Go right ahead and use them. I really have no objection to using them as I released them into the public domain when I published them. If you need me to write anything explaining why I decided to do them, I can also do that.  +++$+++ ::::::::Go right ahead and use them. I really have no objection to using them as I released them into the public domain when I published them. If you need me to write anything explaining why I decided to do them, I can also do that. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 18:24, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
611418 +++$+++ WereSpielChequers +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611408 +++$+++ 611417 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.299303240E09 +++$+++ I'm drafting something at [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost\/2011-03-06\/Editcountitis]], your input would be welcome, I've given you a co-credit as the guy who did the stats. '' +++$+++ :::::::::I'm drafting something at [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-03-06/Editcountitis]], your input would be welcome, I've given you a co-credit as the guy who did the stats. ''[[User:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkGreen">Ϣere</span>]][[User talk:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkRed">Spiel</span>]]<span style="color:DarkOrange">Chequers''</span> 21:34, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

273417 +++$+++ Deon555 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-17 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.169025600E09 +++$+++ Heya Sarah. Thankyou, yes, the birthday was awesome.. The party (due to weather) is this Sunday.... (looking forward to that!) Thanks for the note, good to hear from you again. &mdash; [[User:Deon555|D]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Deon555\/Esperanza|e]]<\/font>[[User:Deon555|on555]]<sup><font color=\"purple\">[[User_talk:Deon555|'''talk''']]<\/font><\/sup><sub><font color=\"orange\">[[User:Deon555\/Desk|'''desk''']]<\/font><\/sub><sup><font color=\"brown\"> +++$+++ Heya Sarah. Thankyou, yes, the birthday was awesome.. The party (due to weather) is this Sunday.... (looking forward to that!) Thanks for the note, good to hear from you again. &mdash; [[User:Deon555|D]]<font color="green">[[User:Deon555/Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User:Deon555|on555]]<sup><font color="purple">[[User_talk:Deon555|'''talk''']]</font></sup><sub><font color="orange">[[User:Deon555/Desk|'''desk''']]</font></sub><sup><font color="brown">[[User:Deon555/Signhere|'''sign here!''']]</font></sup> 01:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
273418 +++$+++ Deon555 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273417 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.169288520E09 +++$+++ Hey Sarah. Thanks for the note. I added <code>jimbowales<\/code> and was just that little bit [[wikt:suspicious|sus]]... you know? Thanks for clearing that up anyway. Slatr'on &mdash; [[User:Deon555|D]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Deon555\/Esperanza|e]]<\/font>[[User:Deon555|on555]]<sup><font color=\"purple\">[[User_talk:Deon555|'''talk''']]<\/font><\/sup><sub><font color=\"orange\">[[User:Deon555\/Desk|'''desk''']]<\/font><\/sub><sup><font color=\"brown\"> +++$+++ ::Hey Sarah. Thanks for the note. I added <code>jimbowales</code> and was just that little bit [[wikt:suspicious|sus]]... you know? Thanks for clearing that up anyway. Slatr'on &mdash; [[User:Deon555|D]]<font color="green">[[User:Deon555/Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User:Deon555|on555]]<sup><font color="purple">[[User_talk:Deon555|'''talk''']]</font></sup><sub><font color="orange">[[User:Deon555/Desk|'''desk''']]</font></sub><sup><font color="brown">[[User:Deon555/Signhere|'''sign here!''']]</font></sup> 02:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

273419 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273419 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-19 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.169264700E09 +++$+++ Just a heads-up that I think you might have had an edit-conflict with someone else trying to clear the same nonsense you were, and thereby inadvertently restored rather than reverted some of it. You might want to take another quick look.  +++$+++ Just a heads-up that I think you might have had an edit-conflict with someone else trying to clear the same nonsense you were, and thereby inadvertently restored rather than reverted some of it. You might want to take another quick look. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 19:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
273420 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273419 +++$+++ 273419 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.169265300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for following up. The same person(s) is messing with Sun Star Net's RfA too.  +++$+++ :Thanks for following up. The same person(s) is messing with Sun Star Net's RfA too. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 19:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

11276 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.205374320E09 +++$+++ [[:User:NeonMerlin|NeonMerlin]] is chipping away at the Nicoll article, and has just tagged your SF birthday list as [[:WP:RS|not a reliable source]] for Jim Nicoll's birthday. -- +++$+++ [[:User:NeonMerlin|NeonMerlin]] is chipping away at the Nicoll article, and has just tagged your SF birthday list as [[:WP:RS|not a reliable source]] for Jim Nicoll's birthday. --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  |  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 19:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
11277 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11276 +++$+++ 11276 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.205381160E09 +++$+++ You should probably explain your latest edit on the talk page of the article, as you didn't do so in the summary. -- +++$+++ :You should probably explain your latest edit on the talk page of the article, as you didn't do so in the summary. --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  |  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 21:06, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
11278 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11276 +++$+++ 11277 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.205382300E09 +++$+++ It's a routine content dispute (this kind of thing is why you needed to do an edit summary). Restore the birthdate, if you can provide the source you used when you created the page. Do not revert the \"claims\" thing, because even though these editors are hostile to fannish interest in Jim, and even more sceptical than usual about everything written about or by him, on that matter they do have a point. -- +++$+++ ::It's a routine content dispute (this kind of thing is why you needed to do an edit summary). Restore the birthdate, if you can provide the source you used when you created the page. Do not revert the "claims" thing, because even though these editors are hostile to fannish interest in Jim, and even more sceptical than usual about everything written about or by him, on that matter they do have a point. --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  |  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 21:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

273421 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-19 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.169266800E09 +++$+++ Do you think that trolls on [[User:Ryulong|Ryulong's]] Request for Adminship are all the same User? They all seem to be vandalizing that page, as well as a couple of others. I reported one of them (which, fortunately, you blocked) to AIV. I certainly think all these Users are the same one.  +++$+++ Do you think that trolls on [[User:Ryulong|Ryulong's]] Request for Adminship are all the same User? They all seem to be vandalizing that page, as well as a couple of others. I reported one of them (which, fortunately, you blocked) to AIV. I certainly think all these Users are the same one. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
273422 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273421 +++$+++ 273421 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.169271180E09 +++$+++ I think you got them all. I had trouble trying to add my support message to [[User:Ryulong|Ryulong's]], as I had to avoid the trolling messages. Normally I remove trolling messages (take a look at my contributions if you wish, you'll see I've done that), but this time I wasn't sure to remove them or not, as it's an RfA, not an article. I think you got all the Users, and I have seen the Talk Page for [[User:Blotchun|Blotchun]]. It seems this person created all those accounts just to attack Ryulong. If you've read my Talk Page, you'll see that this isn't my first encounter with a User with multiple sockpuppets.  +++$+++ :I think you got them all. I had trouble trying to add my support message to [[User:Ryulong|Ryulong's]], as I had to avoid the trolling messages. Normally I remove trolling messages (take a look at my contributions if you wish, you'll see I've done that), but this time I wasn't sure to remove them or not, as it's an RfA, not an article. I think you got all the Users, and I have seen the Talk Page for [[User:Blotchun|Blotchun]]. It seems this person created all those accounts just to attack Ryulong. If you've read my Talk Page, you'll see that this isn't my first encounter with a User with multiple sockpuppets. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 21:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

535566 +++$+++ Busfault +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.172229480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Busfault|Busfault]] 03:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
535567 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535566 +++$+++ 535566 +++$+++ 2007-03-05 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.173154440E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the delay. Feel free to use it. A mention of wikipedia would be fine. I may have some other Trabi pictures somewhere else. Cheers, -- +++$+++ :Sorry for the delay. Feel free to use it. A mention of wikipedia would be fine. I may have some other Trabi pictures somewhere else. Cheers, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 20:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

11280 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-14 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.210831500E09 +++$+++ You didn't finish the AfD nomination for [[Sasha Ormond]], I fixed it for you.  +++$+++ You didn't finish the AfD nomination for [[Sasha Ormond]], I fixed it for you. [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]]•[[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]])</sup> 23:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
11281 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11280 +++$+++ 11280 +++$+++ 2008-05-15 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.210919400E09 +++$+++ No problem.  +++$+++ *No problem. [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]]•[[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]])</sup> 23:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

535569 +++$+++ Buffadren +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535569 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.172272140E09 +++$+++ Hi there, for some reason I remember you as an admin, am i correct. If so take a look at [[Transnistria]] we have a crazed vandal there today.  +++$+++ Hi there, for some reason I remember you as an admin, am i correct. If so take a look at [[Transnistria]] we have a crazed vandal there today. [[User:Buffadren|Buffadren]] 15:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
535570 +++$+++ Criterium +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535569 +++$+++ 535569 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.172274060E09 +++$+++ Why you speak like that? maybe you're a vandal.-- +++$+++ :Why you speak like that? maybe you're a vandal.--[[User:Criterium|Criterium]] 15:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
535571 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535569 +++$+++ 535569 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.172975640E09 +++$+++ Cheers. -- +++$+++ :Cheers. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 18:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
535572 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535569 +++$+++ 535571 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.173344280E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid you're wrong in this instance. Hipi's definitely back. The language is the same and he is also editing from AOL dynamic IP addresses as before (i.e. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/172.180.227.247 172.180.227.247]. Regards, -- +++$+++ ::I'm afraid you're wrong in this instance. Hipi's definitely back. The language is the same and he is also editing from AOL dynamic IP addresses as before (i.e. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/172.180.227.247 172.180.227.247]. Regards, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 00:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

11283 +++$+++ Zombie Hunter Smurf +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-10 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.213131840E09 +++$+++ Hey you seem to be big into editing the alternate history articles, in your opinion do [[Alien Space Bats]] warrant an article as a literary device?   +++$+++ Hey you seem to be big into editing the alternate history articles, in your opinion do [[Alien Space Bats]] warrant an article as a literary device?  [[User:Zombie Hunter Smurf|Zombie Hunter Smurf]] ([[User talk:Zombie Hunter Smurf|talk]]) 14:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
11284 +++$+++ Zombie Hunter Smurf +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11283 +++$+++ 11283 +++$+++ 2008-06-11 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.213215180E09 +++$+++ O well, how about just a section in the [[Alternate history]] article?  (By the way whats the story about?) +++$+++ :O well, how about just a section in the [[Alternate history]] article?  (By the way whats the story about?)[[User:Zombie Hunter Smurf|Zombie Hunter Smurf]] ([[User talk:Zombie Hunter Smurf|talk]]) 13:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
11285 +++$+++ Zombie Hunter Smurf +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11283 +++$+++ 11284 +++$+++ 2008-06-13 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.213388160E09 +++$+++ Nah thats all right, its not worth the effort of it just being deleted.   +++$+++ ::Nah thats all right, its not worth the effort of it just being deleted.  [[User:Zombie Hunter Smurf|Zombie Hunter Smurf]] ([[User talk:Zombie Hunter Smurf|talk]]) 13:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

89262 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-10 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.221101760E09 +++$+++ Hi, a while ago you created an article on this place on WP, including its coordinates. Do you remember where exactly the coordinates and the Chinese characters were from? The problem is that there are a number of places with that name in Inner Mongolia, and that they may have different characters representing them (one \u7ea2\u683c\u5c14 sum in Siziwang Banner of Ulanqab, one \u6d2a\u683c\u5c14 in Sonid Left Banner of Xilin Gol League, another place named \u6d2a\u683c\u5c14 in the Sonid Right Banner of the same League, possibly some more), and it is hard to determine which of these places your coordinates refer to.  +++$+++ Hi, a while ago you created an article on this place on WP, including its coordinates. Do you remember where exactly the coordinates and the Chinese characters were from? The problem is that there are a number of places with that name in Inner Mongolia, and that they may have different characters representing them (one 红格尔 sum in Siziwang Banner of Ulanqab, one 洪格尔 in Sonid Left Banner of Xilin Gol League, another place named 洪格尔 in the Sonid Right Banner of the same League, possibly some more), and it is hard to determine which of these places your coordinates refer to. [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 19:56, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
89263 +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89262 +++$+++ 89262 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.221163500E09 +++$+++ I found the place IDed as Hongge'ertu, \u7ea2\u683c\u5c14\u56fe, by Guo Rugui in \u7b2c\u4e8c\u90e8\u5206\uff1a\u4ece\u201c\u4e5d\u4e00\u516b\u201d\u4e8b\u53d8\u5230\u897f\u5b89\u4e8b\u53d8 \u65e5\u672c\u4fb5\u7ee5\u7684\u6218\u5907\u4f01\u56fe\u548c\u4e2d\u65e5  was modern [[Hobor]] and put that in my article on the [[Suiyuan Campaign (1936)]]. +++$+++ * I found the place IDed as Hongge'ertu, 红格尔图, by Guo Rugui in 第二部分：从“九一八”事变到西安事变 日本侵绥的战备企图和中日  was modern [[Hobor]] and put that in my article on the [[Suiyuan Campaign (1936)]].[[User:Asiaticus|Asiaticus]] ([[User talk:Asiaticus#top|talk]]) 13:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
89264 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89262 +++$+++ 89263 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.221176940E09 +++$+++ Best regards,  +++$+++ ::Best regards, [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 16:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
89265 +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89262 +++$+++ 89264 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.221540240E09 +++$+++ I Did not have any coordiantes on \u7ea2\u683c\u5c14\u56fe, it was just the name of the battle given in Guo Rugui's account.  According to Guo Rugui, [http:\/\/www.wehoo.net\/book\/wlwh\/a30012\/04580.htm  \u7b2c\u4e8c\u90e8\u5206\uff1a\u4ece\u201c\u4e5d\u4e00\u516b\u201d\u4e8b\u53d8\u5230\u897f\u5b89\u4e8b\u53d8\u65e5\u672c\u4fb5\u7ee5\u7684\u6218\u5907\u4f01\u56fe\u548c\u4e2d\u65e5 2], \"\u7ea2\u683c\u5c14\u56fe\u5c5e\u7ee5\u8fdc\u9676\u6797\u53bf\".  Hongge\u2019ertu was the Suiyuan town of Taolinxian \u9676\u6797\u53bf or T'ao-Lin according to the period topo map: [http:\/\/www.lib.utexas.edu\/maps\/ams\/china\/txu-oclc-10552568-nk49-9.jpg  Chi-Ning nk49-9].  It is currently called Hobor in Inner Mongolia.  It had a stategic position linking Shangdu to the advance base at Bailingmiao and was in a pass along the route for the Mongolians intended advance south to take Baotou and Jining. +++$+++ :::I Did not have any coordiantes on 红格尔图, it was just the name of the battle given in Guo Rugui's account.  According to Guo Rugui, [http://www.wehoo.net/book/wlwh/a30012/04580.htm  第二部分：从“九一八”事变到西安事变日本侵绥的战备企图和中日 2], "红格尔图属绥远陶林县".  Hongge’ertu was the Suiyuan town of Taolinxian 陶林县 or T'ao-Lin according to the period topo map: [http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ams/china/txu-oclc-10552568-nk49-9.jpg  Chi-Ning nk49-9].  It is currently called Hobor in Inner Mongolia.  It had a stategic position linking Shangdu to the advance base at Bailingmiao and was in a pass along the route for the Mongolians intended advance south to take Baotou and Jining.[[User:Asiaticus|Asiaticus]] ([[User talk:Asiaticus#top|talk]]) 21:44, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
89266 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89262 +++$+++ 89265 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.221619020E09 +++$+++ Hi! I still could not find any place called Hung-ke-erh-t'u or \u7ea2\u683c\u5c14\u56fe (or something similar) near Taolinxian. I have no doubt that Taolinxian is identical to Hobor, the question is whether \u7ea2\u683c\u5c14\u56fe is the same as Taolinxian. An automatic translation of \"\u7ea2\u683c\u5c14\u56fe\u5c5e\u7ee5\u8fdc\u9676\u6797\u53bf\uff0c\u4e3a\u5343\u4f59\u4eba\u53e3\u7684\u5c0f\u9547\uff0c\u897f\u8ddd\u53bf\u57ce80\u516c\u91cc\uff0c\u5357\u79bb\u96c6\u5b8190\u516c\u91cc\uff0c\u4e1c\u8ddd\u654c\u4f2a\u76d8\u8e1e\u7684\u5546\u90fd30\u516c\u91cc\uff0c\u4e3a\u7ee5\u3001\u5bdf\u4ea4\u754c\u4e4b\u8981\u51b2\uff0c\u662f\u7ee5\u4e1c\u5317\u7684\u95e8\u6237\uff0c\u662f\u5546\u90fd\u901a\u5f80\u767e\u7075\u5e99\u7684\u5fc5\u7ecf\u4e4b\u5730\u3002\u9a7b\u5b88\u8fd9\u91cc\u7684\u662f\u9a91\u5175\u7b2c1\u5e08\u5f6d\u6bd3\u658c\u90e8\u76843\u4e2a\u8fde\u3002\" (from [http:\/\/www.wehoo.net\/book\/wlwh\/a30012\/04580.htm http:\/\/www.wehoo.net\/book\/wlwh\/a30012\/04580.htm] seems to indicate that while \u7ea2\u683c\u5c14\u56fe was part of \u9676\u6797 county of Suiyuan province, Honggort was in fact located about 80 km east of the county center, 90 km north of Jining, and only 30 km from Shangdu (and had only about(?) 1000 inhabitants). In other words, Taolin(xian?) city and Honggort are two different places, 80 kms apart, and Honggort is not so far from Shangdu. I am of course no sure how god your Chinese is (mine is close to non-existent), but maybe this is just the kind of question to ask at WP-project China? Regards,  +++$+++ ::::Hi! I still could not find any place called Hung-ke-erh-t'u or 红格尔图 (or something similar) near Taolinxian. I have no doubt that Taolinxian is identical to Hobor, the question is whether 红格尔图 is the same as Taolinxian. An automatic translation of "红格尔图属绥远陶林县，为千余人口的小镇，西距县城80公里，南离集宁90公里，东距敌伪盘踞的商都30公里，为绥、察交界之要冲，是绥东北的门户，是商都通往百灵庙的必经之地。驻守这里的是骑兵第1师彭毓斌部的3个连。" (from [http://www.wehoo.net/book/wlwh/a30012/04580.htm http://www.wehoo.net/book/wlwh/a30012/04580.htm] seems to indicate that while 红格尔图 was part of 陶林 county of Suiyuan province, Honggort was in fact located about 80 km east of the county center, 90 km north of Jining, and only 30 km from Shangdu (and had only about(?) 1000 inhabitants). In other words, Taolin(xian?) city and Honggort are two different places, 80 kms apart, and Honggort is not so far from Shangdu. I am of course no sure how god your Chinese is (mine is close to non-existent), but maybe this is just the kind of question to ask at WP-project China? Regards, [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 19:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
89267 +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89262 +++$+++ 89266 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.221624420E09 +++$+++ Sure why not. Maybe someone else can figure it out. +++$+++ ::::: Sure why not. Maybe someone else can figure it out.[[User:Asiaticus|Asiaticus]] ([[User talk:Asiaticus#top|talk]]) 21:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
89268 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89262 +++$+++ 89267 +++$+++ 2008-09-17 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.221684420E09 +++$+++ Alright then.  +++$+++ ::::::Alright then. [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 13:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
89269 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ Asiaticus +++$+++ 89262 +++$+++ 89267 +++$+++ 2008-09-17 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.221684960E09 +++$+++ Just found a Hung-ko-erh-t'u at about 113\xb015'E, 41\xb040'N. It is on the northwestern road from Shangdu (which, just in case, is not to be confused with that other [[Xanadu|Shangdu]]), according to the map it is walled and the distance to Shangdu is 33km. But also according to the map, it is located in Chahar, not in Suiyuan.  +++$+++ ::::::Just found a Hung-ko-erh-t'u at about 113°15'E, 41°40'N. It is on the northwestern road from Shangdu (which, just in case, is not to be confused with that other [[Xanadu|Shangdu]]), according to the map it is walled and the distance to Shangdu is 33km. But also according to the map, it is located in Chahar, not in Suiyuan. [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 13:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

535574 +++$+++ Kubura +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535574 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-04 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.173071160E09 +++$+++ Same story with the article [[Serboi]]. Look the section \"external links\". All links are from the same, openly GreaterSerbianist, page.  +++$+++ Same story with the article [[Serboi]]. Look the section "external links". All links are from the same, openly GreaterSerbianist, page. [[User:Kubura|Kubura]] 21:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
535575 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535574 +++$+++ 535574 +++$+++ 2007-03-05 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.173154260E09 +++$+++ I could not visit the link as it was dead. In any case, I do not think a geocities website can be considered \"reliable\", hence I removed it. Regards, -- +++$+++ :I could not visit the link as it was dead. In any case, I do not think a geocities website can be considered "reliable", hence I removed it. Regards, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 20:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

526169 +++$+++ Bluap +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-11 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.155331080E09 +++$+++ I appreciate that the American usage is \"U.S.\" but Wikipedia convention is to use a common style within a page, and the page on transatlantic aircraft plot is written in the British usage (being a British event), so should use \"US\".  I wouldn't be particularly bothered by this, except there are various paragraphs with \"UK\" and \"U.S.\" in close proximity, and the mixed usage looks very odd.  +++$+++ I appreciate that the American usage is "U.S." but Wikipedia convention is to use a common style within a page, and the page on transatlantic aircraft plot is written in the British usage (being a British event), so should use "US".  I wouldn't be particularly bothered by this, except there are various paragraphs with "UK" and "U.S." in close proximity, and the mixed usage looks very odd. [[User:Bluap|Bluap]] 14:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
526170 +++$+++ Bluap +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526169 +++$+++ 526169 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.155331740E09 +++$+++ I do realise that the manual of style says otherwise, but that seems to be for isolated instances.  Having mixed usage in the same sentence look very strange, and contradicts the guidance to use a single style throught a page.  +++$+++ : I do realise that the manual of style says otherwise, but that seems to be for isolated instances.  Having mixed usage in the same sentence look very strange, and contradicts the guidance to use a single style throught a page. [[User:Bluap|Bluap]] 14:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
526171 +++$+++ Bluap +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526169 +++$+++ 526170 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.155331980E09 +++$+++ Specifically \"If an article is predominantly written in one type of English, aim to conform to that type\"  +++$+++ :: Specifically "If an article is predominantly written in one type of English, aim to conform to that type" [[User:Bluap|Bluap]] 14:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
526172 +++$+++ Bluap +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526169 +++$+++ 526171 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.155333300E09 +++$+++ If you look at the page history, I ''had'' made the entries consistent within the article (with the exceptions of titles of articles in the references section).  However, a few minutes later you submitted an edit changing a couple of the abbreviations back to \"U.S.\", while leaving the rest as \"US\".  I suspect that you didn't refresh the page before making your edit, so hadn't realised that the inconsistancy had been fixed (in the other direction).  +++$+++ ::: If you look at the page history, I ''had'' made the entries consistent within the article (with the exceptions of titles of articles in the references section).  However, a few minutes later you submitted an edit changing a couple of the abbreviations back to "U.S.", while leaving the rest as "US".  I suspect that you didn't refresh the page before making your edit, so hadn't realised that the inconsistancy had been fixed (in the other direction). [[User:Bluap|Bluap]] 14:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

273433 +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273433 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-21 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.169439840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:OhanaUnited|<span style="background-color:#DDDDFF; font-weight:bold"><font color="#0000FF">OhanaUnited</font></span>]] 20:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
273434 +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273433 +++$+++ 273433 +++$+++ 2007-01-21 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.169452260E09 +++$+++ Whatever you say... I know I'm not in a fair arguing position at the moment. I neither have higher edits or a membership longer than you. Let's drop the debate here before it esculates into a full fledge flame war. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Whatever you say... I know I'm not in a fair arguing position at the moment. I neither have higher edits or a membership longer than you. Let's drop the debate here before it esculates into a full fledge flame war. Sincerely, [[User:OhanaUnited|<span style="background-color:#DDDDFF; font-weight:bold"><font color="#0000FF">OhanaUnited</font></span>]] 23:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

535581 +++$+++ Gryffindor +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-17 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.174188300E09 +++$+++ there was a mediation offer quite a while ago concerning the issue of [[Trentino-South Tyrol]]. I am happy to announce that the issue has been discussed, voted upon and settled. However the mediation offer still needs to be officially closed. Please take a minute to visit the page [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal\/Cases\/2006-10-20 Trentino-South Tyrol]] and put your signature at the bottom if you agree with the decision, thank you. sincerely  +++$+++ there was a mediation offer quite a while ago concerning the issue of [[Trentino-South Tyrol]]. I am happy to announce that the issue has been discussed, voted upon and settled. However the mediation offer still needs to be officially closed. Please take a minute to visit the page [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-20 Trentino-South Tyrol]] and put your signature at the bottom if you agree with the decision, thank you. sincerely [[User:Gryffindor|<font color="red">Gryffindor</font>]] 20:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
535582 +++$+++ Taalo +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535581 +++$+++ 535581 +++$+++ 2007-03-17 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.174192380E09 +++$+++ A very important note.  This mediation offer concerned the greater overall naming convention to use in this region, not just the name of the region itself.  We came up with a very good compromise for the regional name itself.  I for one am still looking forward for [[User:Lar|Lar]] to help us out.  +++$+++ * A very important note.  This mediation offer concerned the greater overall naming convention to use in this region, not just the name of the region itself.  We came up with a very good compromise for the regional name itself.  I for one am still looking forward for [[User:Lar|Lar]] to help us out. [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 21:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

273438 +++$+++ Trödel +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.169595900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking action while I was not on the wiki! I've increased his block to a week and left an explanation on his talk page. I was already debating on whether to go for a week but 6\/26 edits to the Wikipedia space after yesterdays comments and exhange convinced me that a week was the minimum necessary. --<font color=\"#06C\"> +++$+++ Thanks for taking action while I was not on the wiki! I've increased his block to a week and left an explanation on his talk page. I was already debating on whether to go for a week but 6/26 edits to the Wikipedia space after yesterdays comments and exhange convinced me that a week was the minimum necessary. --<font color="#06C">[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]]</font> 15:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
273439 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273438 +++$+++ 273438 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.169623560E09 +++$+++ I somewhat agree with your comments at my talk page. This needs another look when the subject is older. Agreements mean zero, apologies are given merely to please crowds, and old disruptive behaviours continue to resurface. As much as I'd like to see things improve, I don't think they will. I'm not here to play good guy to somebody elses children. I'm here to write an encyclopedia, and getting back to that is what I shall do. --  +++$+++ :I somewhat agree with your comments at my talk page. This needs another look when the subject is older. Agreements mean zero, apologies are given merely to please crowds, and old disruptive behaviours continue to resurface. As much as I'd like to see things improve, I don't think they will. I'm not here to play good guy to somebody elses children. I'm here to write an encyclopedia, and getting back to that is what I shall do. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 23:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

535583 +++$+++ Raystorm +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.174367940E09 +++$+++ Hey there. You left a message at my talk. Did you mean me or were you responding to Steve? Cheers  +++$+++ Hey there. You left a message at my talk. Did you mean me or were you responding to Steve? Cheers [[User:Raystorm|Raystorm]] 22:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
535584 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535583 +++$+++ 535583 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.174368180E09 +++$+++ Sorry mate, wrong talk page. I should have left it at Steve's. Cheers, -- +++$+++ :Sorry mate, wrong talk page. I should have left it at Steve's. Cheers, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 22:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
535585 +++$+++ Raystorm +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535583 +++$+++ 535584 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.174368240E09 +++$+++ *Grin* I was indeed a bit confused when I read it. Thanks for the quick response. ;-) Cheers!  +++$+++ :: *Grin* I was indeed a bit confused when I read it. Thanks for the quick response. ;-) Cheers! [[User:Raystorm|Raystorm]] 22:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
535586 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535583 +++$+++ 535585 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.174368720E09 +++$+++ If I get a chance, I will probably take this to [[WP:RM]] to sort things out once and for all. I would drop you a line given the case. Thanks, -- +++$+++ :::If I get a chance, I will probably take this to [[WP:RM]] to sort things out once and for all. I would drop you a line given the case. Thanks, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 22:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

11296 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11296 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-07 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.228696020E09 +++$+++ If you want to find images, I see some are available at http:\/\/memory.loc.gov\/ammem\/index.html  I searched for \"White City\" Chicago.  See the images at [[Chicago Race Riot of 1919]] to see how to credit these images for those before 1923.  Also, add community area and South Side and incorporate into the respective articles as appropriate.  Also, is there any way to link this White City to the reference at http:\/\/www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org\/pages\/1386.html ?  The encyclopedia of Chicago might have some other articles that mention White City in a constructive way.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ If you want to find images, I see some are available at http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/index.html  I searched for "White City" Chicago.  See the images at [[Chicago Race Riot of 1919]] to see how to credit these images for those before 1923.  Also, add community area and South Side and incorporate into the respective articles as appropriate.  Also, is there any way to link this White City to the reference at http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/1386.html ?  The encyclopedia of Chicago might have some other articles that mention White City in a constructive way.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 16:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
11297 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11296 +++$+++ 11296 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.229941980E09 +++$+++ I see you converted most of the parenthetical refs to footnotes.  Can you put them in the {{tl|cite news}} template so that everything is in the same format?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :I see you converted most of the parenthetical refs to footnotes.  Can you put them in the {{tl|cite news}} template so that everything is in the same format?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 02:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

11298 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11298 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-11 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.229068320E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> Backslash Forwardslash 23:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> Backslash Forwardslash 23:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
11299 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11298 +++$+++ 11298 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.229171940E09 +++$+++ I have been delinquent, but please accept this: {{User Good Article|Merle Reskin Theatre}} for your work in getting this page started.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :I have been delinquent, but please accept this: {{User Good Article|Merle Reskin Theatre}} for your work in getting this page started.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 04:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

11300 +++$+++ Perry Middlemiss +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11300 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-08 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.231407000E09 +++$+++ I've asked the 1999 treasurer - who compiled the new numbers - to send the figures to the NESFA Long List people. -- +++$+++ I've asked the 1999 treasurer - who compiled the new numbers - to send the figures to the NESFA Long List people. --[[User:Perry Middlemiss|Perry Middlemiss]] ([[User talk:Perry Middlemiss|talk]]) 01:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
11301 +++$+++ Perry Middlemiss +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11300 +++$+++ 11300 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.231408200E09 +++$+++ No problems at all. -- +++$+++ :No problems at all. --[[User:Perry Middlemiss|Perry Middlemiss]] ([[User talk:Perry Middlemiss|talk]]) 01:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

273446 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-24 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.169693820E09 +++$+++ It is unfortunate that a simple welcoming and advice from me to a new User turned out to be a major disaster. As I said to other Users, I thought the situation was over when I asked Mr. [[User:ChrisGriswold|ChrisGriswold]] for advice, and he said to leave the User alone. Sadly, it didn't end there...and you already know what happened, so I won't continue. I have some questions though about some issues that I'm concerned about, and I'm hoping you'll answer them. Since I was the one who brought this to everyone's attention, and because I was heavily involved in the incident, what negative affects will it have on me in the future? I try to be a User who people would like to work with. Will Users still want to do that after this? Also, if I ever decide to request Adminship, would anyone want me as an Administrator now? Seriously, I didn't join Wikipedia simply to get new Users in trouble.  +++$+++ It is unfortunate that a simple welcoming and advice from me to a new User turned out to be a major disaster. As I said to other Users, I thought the situation was over when I asked Mr. [[User:ChrisGriswold|ChrisGriswold]] for advice, and he said to leave the User alone. Sadly, it didn't end there...and you already know what happened, so I won't continue. I have some questions though about some issues that I'm concerned about, and I'm hoping you'll answer them. Since I was the one who brought this to everyone's attention, and because I was heavily involved in the incident, what negative affects will it have on me in the future? I try to be a User who people would like to work with. Will Users still want to do that after this? Also, if I ever decide to request Adminship, would anyone want me as an Administrator now? Seriously, I didn't join Wikipedia simply to get new Users in trouble. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
273447 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273446 +++$+++ 273446 +++$+++ 2007-01-28 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.170029160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your response. I wasn't interested in Adminship now (as you said, I have too few edits, and therefore, not enough experience). I was simply concerned in case when I decide to try to become one other Users bring the incident up. Thanks for clearing my concerns up.  +++$+++ * Thanks for your response. I wasn't interested in Adminship now (as you said, I have too few edits, and therefore, not enough experience). I was simply concerned in case when I decide to try to become one other Users bring the incident up. Thanks for clearing my concerns up. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
273448 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273446 +++$+++ 273446 +++$+++ 2007-01-28 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.170037080E09 +++$+++ I told ONUnicorn that the page had been cleared. She asked [[User:ChrisGriswold|ChrisGriswold]] about it, and there was a discussion about restoring the page when another User posted, but ChrisGriswold said to drop the issue, and I agree. I do have one more question about Adminship though: as you probably read on my Talk Page, I was blocked for violating the three-revert rule (which, I assure you, I violated it by accident, but it was a violation nonetheless). How would that affect me (or any User who got blocked even once)? I read that people who have been blocked have a hard time becoming an Administrator.  +++$+++ * I told ONUnicorn that the page had been cleared. She asked [[User:ChrisGriswold|ChrisGriswold]] about it, and there was a discussion about restoring the page when another User posted, but ChrisGriswold said to drop the issue, and I agree. I do have one more question about Adminship though: as you probably read on my Talk Page, I was blocked for violating the three-revert rule (which, I assure you, I violated it by accident, but it was a violation nonetheless). How would that affect me (or any User who got blocked even once)? I read that people who have been blocked have a hard time becoming an Administrator. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

535591 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-03 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.175603220E09 +++$+++ Anyway, you have a nice Easter and just let me know when possible, so that I can complete the updating of that table.  +++$+++ Anyway, you have a nice Easter and just let me know when possible, so that I can complete the updating of that table. [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] | [[User talk:Mountolive|Talk]] 05:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
535592 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535591 +++$+++ 535591 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.175626680E09 +++$+++ [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]], technically speaking, it is the Partido Andalucista (at the time, still including Pacheco in its ranks). The PSA was born in 1976 out of Alianza Socialista de Andaluc\xeda (ASA) and Reconstrucci\xf3n Socialista de Andaluc\xeda (RSA). ASA was the main regionalist party and one of the most active members of the democratic opposition during the late Franco period. Shortly after, the first ever ''mitin'' since the Spanish Civil War was organised by ASA in February 1976 (it was also the first time the Andalusian flag was allowed to be waved in a public event. This [http:\/\/www.andalucia.cc\/adarve\/andalucismoencatalunya\/02.pdf article] is quite comprehensive. The PSA cannot be understood without considering the situation of the Andalusian immigrants in Catalonia. You could even say that at the time, it was more successful over there than in Andalusia, where it ran in coalition with Tierno Galv\xe1n's Partido Socialista Popular, got a single MP in 1977, who later defected to PSOE, leaving them without parliamentary representation (got to love politics! ;-))  +++$+++ :[[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]], technically speaking, it is the Partido Andalucista (at the time, still including Pacheco in its ranks). The PSA was born in 1976 out of Alianza Socialista de Andalucía (ASA) and Reconstrucción Socialista de Andalucía (RSA). ASA was the main regionalist party and one of the most active members of the democratic opposition during the late Franco period. Shortly after, the first ever ''mitin'' since the Spanish Civil War was organised by ASA in February 1976 (it was also the first time the Andalusian flag was allowed to be waved in a public event. This [http://www.andalucia.cc/adarve/andalucismoencatalunya/02.pdf article] is quite comprehensive. The PSA cannot be understood without considering the situation of the Andalusian immigrants in Catalonia. You could even say that at the time, it was more successful over there than in Andalusia, where it ran in coalition with Tierno Galván's Partido Socialista Popular, got a single MP in 1977, who later defected to PSOE, leaving them without parliamentary representation (got to love politics! ;-)) [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 11:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
535593 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535591 +++$+++ 535592 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.175694240E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your help.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for your help. [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] | [[User talk:Mountolive|Talk]] 06:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

273449 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273449 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-26 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.169871300E09 +++$+++ Hi, Sarah.  I feel a little guilty (and mischievous) for not telling you about it, but I thought you might enjoy finding a little Easter Egg now and then.  I'm glad you found it funny; I wrote it as a tribute to you and the wonderful service you perform. In other news, I know you have a great eye for spotting potential admins, and I wanted to bring {{User|Yllosubmarine}} to your attention and put her on your radar. She's doing some fantastic work on the wiki and she demonstrates innate admin-like skills that makes her perfect for the job.  Take care, and I hope you enjoy a relaxing wikibreak.  &mdash; +++$+++ Hi, Sarah.  I feel a little guilty (and mischievous) for not telling you about it, but I thought you might enjoy finding a little Easter Egg now and then.  I'm glad you found it funny; I wrote it as a tribute to you and the wonderful service you perform. In other news, I know you have a great eye for spotting potential admins, and I wanted to bring {{User|Yllosubmarine}} to your attention and put her on your radar. She's doing some fantastic work on the wiki and she demonstrates innate admin-like skills that makes her perfect for the job.  Take care, and I hope you enjoy a relaxing wikibreak.  &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 20:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
273450 +++$+++ Daniel.Bryant +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273449 +++$+++ 273449 +++$+++ 2007-01-27 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.169959080E09 +++$+++ Sarah may pull the strings, but who pulls Ewart's strings? :) (I believe this whole thing is a reference to [[WP:LOC]]...) Cheers, and ponder that one :), ''' +++$+++ :Sarah may pull the strings, but who pulls Ewart's strings? :) (I believe this whole thing is a reference to [[WP:LOC]]...) Cheers, and ponder that one :), '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|Daniel.Bryant]]''' 20:38, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
273451 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273449 +++$+++ 273450 +++$+++ 2007-01-28 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.169977800E09 +++$+++ ...Happy belated [[Australia Day]] to both of you! &mdash; +++$+++ ::...Happy belated [[Australia Day]] to both of you! &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 01:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

535594 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535594 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.175897760E09 +++$+++ Considering that the most important [[High IQ societies]], Mensa, was created by an Australian and an Englishman, I find quite disruptive your \"spelling\" corrections. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English]].-- +++$+++ Considering that the most important [[High IQ societies]], Mensa, was created by an Australian and an Englishman, I find quite disruptive your "spelling" corrections. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English]].--[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 15:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
535595 +++$+++  +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535594 +++$+++ 535594 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.175903700E09 +++$+++ This was addressed on the [[Talk:Mensa International#-ize\/-ise|Mensa International talk page]] (where they use -ize) ... I was just following the precedent set last summer ... BTW, [[American and British English spelling differences#-ise .2F -ize|American and British English spelling differences]] says ... <blockquote>''Worldwide, -ize endings prevail in scientific writing and are commonly used by many '''international organizations'''.''<\/blockquote> ... regardless, it's a tempest in a tea pot and not worth edit waring ... \"Two peoples separated by a common language.\" &mdash;{{user|68.239.79.97}} 16:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :This was addressed on the [[Talk:Mensa International#-ize/-ise|Mensa International talk page]] (where they use -ize) ... I was just following the precedent set last summer ... BTW, [[American and British English spelling differences#-ise .2F -ize|American and British English spelling differences]] says ... <blockquote>''Worldwide, -ize endings prevail in scientific writing and are commonly used by many '''international organizations'''.''</blockquote> ... regardless, it's a tempest in a tea pot and not worth edit waring ... "Two peoples separated by a common language." &mdash;{{user|68.239.79.97}} 16:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
535596 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535594 +++$+++ 535594 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.180579200E09 +++$+++ Glad you liked it. I think I got the info off the DVLA website but it could be incorrect or maybe it was a typo of mine. I will get this changed for you. By the way, I did not see the car in Stamford Hall this year. With the kind of miserable weather we had, I guess it was the most sensible thing to do! Cheers, -- +++$+++ :Glad you liked it. I think I got the info off the DVLA website but it could be incorrect or maybe it was a typo of mine. I will get this changed for you. By the way, I did not see the car in Stamford Hall this year. With the kind of miserable weather we had, I guess it was the most sensible thing to do! Cheers, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 19:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

569863 +++$+++ AGK +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-06 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.178520780E09 +++$+++ ''Regards'',<br> +++$+++ ''Regards'',<br>[[User:AGK|<font color="#ED9121">'''Anthony'''</font>]] 23:53, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
569864 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569863 +++$+++ 569863 +++$+++ 2007-05-07 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.178521260E09 +++$+++ Hello!  That's funny - your user page says that you are an admin here!  I get beaten to blocks a lot of the time too - guess it shows that we have lots of busy admins about the place, which is a good thing!  Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello!  That's funny - your user page says that you are an admin here!  I get beaten to blocks a lot of the time too - guess it shows that we have lots of busy admins about the place, which is a good thing!  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 00:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

11313 +++$+++ Graham87 +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11313 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-04 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.246706100E09 +++$+++ All done; I've moved it to [[Dean O'Banion]] and [[WP:HM|history merged]] the page while I was there. ''' +++$+++ All done; I've moved it to [[Dean O'Banion]] and [[WP:HM|history merged]] the page while I was there. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 04:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
11314 +++$+++ Graham87 +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11313 +++$+++ 11313 +++$+++ 2009-07-04 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.246732680E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. ''' +++$+++ :You're welcome. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 11:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

273459 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-31 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.170285840E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Sarah.  I will keep an eye on it.  I am swamped with work, so won't be able to check in as often as I would like.  But I will let you know if there is a problem. +++$+++ Thanks, Sarah.  I will keep an eye on it.  I am swamped with work, so won't be able to check in as often as I would like.  But I will let you know if there is a problem.[[User:Jance|Jance]] 15:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
273460 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273459 +++$+++ 273459 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.170309840E09 +++$+++ Would you mind taking a look at [[homeowners association]] and see what you think of the \"Constitutional Challenges\" section?  Eg, does it make sense from a lay person's perspective?  Thanks. +++$+++ :Would you mind taking a look at [[homeowners association]] and see what you think of the "Constitutional Challenges" section?  Eg, does it make sense from a lay person's perspective?  Thanks.[[User:Jance|Jance]] 22:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

273461 +++$+++ Flameviper +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-02 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.170452460E09 +++$+++ I remember having an edit war with you on [[User:Willy on Wheels!]] back in my vandal days. ~ '''<font color=\"CC0000\">[[User:Flameviper|Flame]]<\/font><font color=\"009900\">[[User talk:Flameviper|vip]]<\/font><font color=\"00CC00\">[[User:Flameviper\/Esperanza|e]]<\/font><font color=\"009900\">[[User talk:Flameviper|r]]<\/font>''' <sup><span class=\"plainlinks><font color=\"C0FFEE\"> +++$+++ I remember having an edit war with you on [[User:Willy on Wheels!]] back in my vandal days. ~ '''<font color="CC0000">[[User:Flameviper|Flame]]</font><font color="009900">[[User talk:Flameviper|vip]]</font><font color="00CC00">[[User:Flameviper/Esperanza|e]]</font><font color="009900">[[User talk:Flameviper|r]]</font>''' <sup><span class="plainlinks><font color="C0FFEE">[[User:Flameviper/Whosapeach|Who's a Peach?]]</font></span></sup> 13:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
273462 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273461 +++$+++ 273461 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.170452940E09 +++$+++ I remember you from your previous RfAs and your invitation to join adopt-a-user, however, you're mistaken about that userpage. I've never edited it before and in fact, neither have you. The only people to edit it were David Gerard, Rdsmith4, Adam Rock and Cydebot. ''' +++$+++ :I remember you from your previous RfAs and your invitation to join adopt-a-user, however, you're mistaken about that userpage. I've never edited it before and in fact, neither have you. The only people to edit it were David Gerard, Rdsmith4, Adam Rock and Cydebot. '''[[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah]]''' 13:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
273463 +++$+++ Flameviper +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273461 +++$+++ 273462 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.170453000E09 +++$+++ It must have been a different WoW sock, then. I distinctly remember calling you a \"demented poopy-saturated llama\", in all caps no less. Sorry about that. ~ '''<font color=\"CC0000\">[[User:Flameviper|Flame]]<\/font><font color=\"009900\">[[User talk:Flameviper|vip]]<\/font><font color=\"00CC00\">[[User:Flameviper\/Esperanza|e]]<\/font><font color=\"009900\">[[User talk:Flameviper|r]]<\/font>''' <sup><span class=\"plainlinks><font color=\"C0FFEE\"> +++$+++ ::It must have been a different WoW sock, then. I distinctly remember calling you a "demented poopy-saturated llama", in all caps no less. Sorry about that. ~ '''<font color="CC0000">[[User:Flameviper|Flame]]</font><font color="009900">[[User talk:Flameviper|vip]]</font><font color="00CC00">[[User:Flameviper/Esperanza|e]]</font><font color="009900">[[User talk:Flameviper|r]]</font>''' <sup><span class="plainlinks><font color="C0FFEE">[[User:Flameviper/Whosapeach|Who's a Peach?]]</font></span></sup> 13:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

535606 +++$+++ Alaexis +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535606 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-30 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.180561680E09 +++$+++ ps. perdoneme por mi espa\xf1ol )  +++$+++ ps. perdoneme por mi español ) [[User:Alaexis|Alæxis]]<sub>[[User_talk:Alaexis|¿question?]]</sub> 14:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
535607 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535606 +++$+++ 535606 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.180578840E09 +++$+++ Hi Al\xe6xis. In all honesty, I have only driven past the A92 a couple of times but I reckon it could be Antequera. The church tower looks similar and the building on the top of the hill appears to be the Moorish castle. De todas maneras, no estoy completamente seguro. El problema es que vivo en Inglaterra por lo que no te puedo asegurar que  vaya a estar cerca de Antequera en los pr\xf3ximos meses. Saludos, -- +++$+++ :Hi Alæxis. In all honesty, I have only driven past the A92 a couple of times but I reckon it could be Antequera. The church tower looks similar and the building on the top of the hill appears to be the Moorish castle. De todas maneras, no estoy completamente seguro. El problema es que vivo en Inglaterra por lo que no te puedo asegurar que  vaya a estar cerca de Antequera en los próximos meses. Saludos, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 19:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
535608 +++$+++ Alaexis +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535606 +++$+++ 535607 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.180630440E09 +++$+++ Oh, I see. Thx, anyway.  +++$+++ :: Oh, I see. Thx, anyway. [[User:Alaexis|Alæxis]]<sub>[[User_talk:Alaexis|¿question?]]</sub> 09:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
535609 +++$+++ Alaexis +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535606 +++$+++ 535607 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.180661340E09 +++$+++ He mirado las fotos de Antequera al flickr y ahora estoy seguro que fotografi\xe9 esta ciudad.  +++$+++ :: He mirado las fotos de Antequera al flickr y ahora estoy seguro que fotografié esta ciudad. [[User:Alaexis|Alæxis]]<sub>[[User_talk:Alaexis|¿question?]]</sub> 18:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
535610 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535606 +++$+++ 535609 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.180662300E09 +++$+++ Me alegra de que hayas resuelto tu duda. Saludos, -- +++$+++ :::Me alegra de que hayas resuelto tu duda. Saludos, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 18:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

489203 +++$+++ Appraiser +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-17 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.200605640E09 +++$+++ Can you just have it never automatically add [[:Category:National Historic Landmarks of the United States]]? This morning there are ~600 individual articles in that category, almost all of which are repeated in their respective state landmark categories. Thanks-- +++$+++ Can you just have it never automatically add [[:Category:National Historic Landmarks of the United States]]? This morning there are ~600 individual articles in that category, almost all of which are repeated in their respective state landmark categories. Thanks--[[User:Appraiser|Appraiser]] ([[User talk:Appraiser|talk]]) 13:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
489204 +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489203 +++$+++ 489203 +++$+++ 2008-01-17 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.200608880E09 +++$+++ I've removed the categorization that was putting everything into [[:Category:National Historic Landmarks of the United States]] if nhl was specified but locmapin wasn't specified.  I'm hoping this will solve the problem.  -- +++$+++ : I've removed the categorization that was putting everything into [[:Category:National Historic Landmarks of the United States]] if nhl was specified but locmapin wasn't specified.  I'm hoping this will solve the problem.  --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 14:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
489205 +++$+++ Appraiser +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489203 +++$+++ 489204 +++$+++ 2008-01-17 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.200611640E09 +++$+++ Thanks. You are right though; each NHL article will have to be looked at to make sure it is in a state landmark category. Actually, some of them don't have NRHP infoboxes, and so wouldn't be able to key off of the type=nhl parameter either.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks. You are right though; each NHL article will have to be looked at to make sure it is in a state landmark category. Actually, some of them don't have NRHP infoboxes, and so wouldn't be able to key off of the type=nhl parameter either.--[[User:Appraiser|Appraiser]] ([[User talk:Appraiser|talk]]) 15:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
489206 +++$+++ Appraiser +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489203 +++$+++ 489203 +++$+++ 2008-01-25 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.201320600E09 +++$+++ Could we just have it not automatically add these categories?-- +++$+++ *Could we just have it not automatically add these categories?--[[User:Appraiser|Appraiser]] ([[User talk:Appraiser|talk]]) 20:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
489207 +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-25 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.201330080E09 +++$+++ I've made those updates.  Actually, I was able to classify NHLs in Georgia into [[:Category:National Historic Landmarks in Georgia (U.S. state)]].  (As opposed to all of the National Historic Landmarks in the former Soviet republic of Georgia... oh, wait.)  I removed the categorization from those in New York.  -- +++$+++ ::::I've made those updates.  Actually, I was able to classify NHLs in Georgia into [[:Category:National Historic Landmarks in Georgia (U.S. state)]].  (As opposed to all of the National Historic Landmarks in the former Soviet republic of Georgia... oh, wait.)  I removed the categorization from those in New York.  --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 22:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

11320 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-01 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.251796980E09 +++$+++ You voted in one of the two most recent ballots.  Feel free to come vote at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago\/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates]] for our next [[:Category:Top-importance Chicago articles]]. Voting continues until September 10 and nominations\/discussions are ongoing for future ballot candidates at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago\/Assessment]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ You voted in one of the two most recent ballots.  Feel free to come vote at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates]] for our next [[:Category:Top-importance Chicago articles]]. Voting continues until September 10 and nominations/discussions are ongoing for future ballot candidates at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 02:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
11321 +++$+++  +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11320 +++$+++ 11320 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.251846720E09 +++$+++ A complete ballot includes 12 articles.  Feel free to complete your ballot at any time.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :A complete ballot includes 12 articles.  Feel free to complete your ballot at any time.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 16:12, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

613556 +++$+++ Self-ref +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-05 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.236253560E09 +++$+++ so, it has been a while, and i have watched the fireworks for months now without saying much so that i would not interfere or be falsely accused of being my wife. however, now Hrafn has gone and come back and you are still mixed up with him and Orange Marlin and Chihuahua and the rest, so i want to ask you: what <i>is<\/i> your relation to Hrafn? why is it that you <i>always<\/i> seem to come to his defense or appear to post whenever his name is mentioned? is he a relative or a close friend or something? thanks.  +++$+++ so, it has been a while, and i have watched the fireworks for months now without saying much so that i would not interfere or be falsely accused of being my wife. however, now Hrafn has gone and come back and you are still mixed up with him and Orange Marlin and Chihuahua and the rest, so i want to ask you: what <i>is</i> your relation to Hrafn? why is it that you <i>always</i> seem to come to his defense or appear to post whenever his name is mentioned? is he a relative or a close friend or something? thanks. [[User:Self-ref|-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode)]] ([[User talk:Self-ref|talk]]) 03:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
613557 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613556 +++$+++ 613556 +++$+++ 2009-03-05 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.236287280E09 +++$+++ What a peculiar question. Hrafn's a constructive editor who is on my watchlist. . .  +++$+++ :What a peculiar question. Hrafn's a constructive editor who is on my watchlist. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 13:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

569866 +++$+++ Shoessss +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-08 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.178616900E09 +++$+++ #{{user|Shoessss}}Ready to move to the next level, but would like some advice and help on the best possible way to avoid any and all land mines.  Will let my record speak for itself.Thanks in advance for any and all help. +++$+++ #{{user|Shoessss}}Ready to move to the next level, but would like some advice and help on the best possible way to avoid any and all land mines.  Will let my record speak for itself.Thanks in advance for any and all help.[[User:Shoessss|Shoessss]] 02:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
569867 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569866 +++$+++ 569866 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.178683680E09 +++$+++ I think that if you forget your password then that's pretty much it.  I don't know of a way of finding out what it would be legally.  You'll more-than-likely have to create a new account if you want to keep on contributing in a logged-in capacity, sorry.  +++$+++ :I think that if you forget your password then that's pretty much it.  I don't know of a way of finding out what it would be legally.  You'll more-than-likely have to create a new account if you want to keep on contributing in a logged-in capacity, sorry. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
569868 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569866 +++$+++ 569866 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.178685180E09 +++$+++ [[:Wikipedia:Help_desk#Image:Gin_.28Case_Closed.29.jpg|Question reposted on to the Help Desk]].  +++$+++ :[[:Wikipedia:Help_desk#Image:Gin_.28Case_Closed.29.jpg|Question reposted on to the Help Desk]]. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

535614 +++$+++ Acroterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-17 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.184699700E09 +++$+++ I wanted to say hello, since I did a namechange recently and discovered afterwards that there was an admin named Asterion, complete with a blue signature like mine.  It looked a little too similar, so I've changed my sig.  I don't think there will be any confusion (Cecropia apparently didn't think so either), but I wanted to alert you to my existence.  '''<font face=\"Arial\"> +++$+++ I wanted to say hello, since I did a namechange recently and discovered afterwards that there was an admin named Asterion, complete with a blue signature like mine.  It looked a little too similar, so I've changed my sig.  I don't think there will be any confusion (Cecropia apparently didn't think so either), but I wanted to alert you to my existence.  '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 12:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
535615 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535614 +++$+++ 535614 +++$+++ 2007-07-17 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.184737380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up. --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 22:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
535616 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535614 +++$+++ 535614 +++$+++ 2007-07-17 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.184737320E09 +++$+++ Hi Megan, I will check tomorrow and get back to you by email. It is probable that the resolution would not get any higher, as the pictures were on Photo CD format, taken with a standard 35mm camera. Nonetheless, I would see what I can dig out for you. Regards, -- +++$+++ :Hi Megan, I will check tomorrow and get back to you by email. It is probable that the resolution would not get any higher, as the pictures were on Photo CD format, taken with a standard 35mm camera. Nonetheless, I would see what I can dig out for you. Regards, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 22:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

11327 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11327 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-28 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.262066700E09 +++$+++ I have proposed an alteration to your addition on the talkpage there, please comment.  +++$+++ I have proposed an alteration to your addition on the talkpage there, please comment. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 22:05, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
11328 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11327 +++$+++ 11327 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.262080200E09 +++$+++ Cool thanks, lets see if we can keep the excessive commentary out, as the world and his lawyers are watching, regards.  +++$+++ :Cool thanks, lets see if we can keep the excessive commentary out, as the world and his lawyers are watching, regards. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 01:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

535617 +++$+++ Kubura +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-18 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.184776320E09 +++$+++ Second, he hasn't replied at all on the talkpage (although he left comments on some talkpages).  +++$+++ Second, he hasn't replied at all on the talkpage (although he left comments on some talkpages). [[User:Kubura|Kubura]] 09:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
535618 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535617 +++$+++ 535617 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.185513600E09 +++$+++ I would say the editing style is different. If you want, try filing a report. I do not have CheckUser privileges myself, so you would need to follow process. -- +++$+++ :I would say the editing style is different. If you want, try filing a report. I do not have CheckUser privileges myself, so you would need to follow process. --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 22:20, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

535620 +++$+++ Anittas +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-26 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.185513180E09 +++$+++ It seems that you think the userbox is acceptable, but that user, together with an admin, blocked and protected the talkpage of User:Anonimu for having a similar disclaimer on his talkpage and later, for having that userbox included on his talkpage. See [[User talk:Anonimu]]-- +++$+++ It seems that you think the userbox is acceptable, but that user, together with an admin, blocked and protected the talkpage of User:Anonimu for having a similar disclaimer on his talkpage and later, for having that userbox included on his talkpage. See [[User talk:Anonimu]]--[[User:Anittas|Thus Spake Anittas]] 22:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
535621 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535620 +++$+++ 535620 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.185513480E09 +++$+++ Different admins have different criteria or approach a problem from a different perspective. Personally I do not think that the userpages of active editors should be edited without previous discussion with the involved party. Regards, -- +++$+++ :Different admins have different criteria or approach a problem from a different perspective. Personally I do not think that the userpages of active editors should be edited without previous discussion with the involved party. Regards, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 22:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
535622 +++$+++ Anittas +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535620 +++$+++ 535621 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.185513960E09 +++$+++ I agree. -- +++$+++ ::I agree. --[[User:Anittas|Thus Spake Anittas]] 22:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

273478 +++$+++ LibDeepThroat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273478 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-02 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.170483900E09 +++$+++ Beleive me, I'm a pacifist and I don't want any war, conflict or arguement with anyone. I just don't want insults. I have a history of being bullied and it give me very sad memories and I'll sick and tired of this. That's another why I quit the Liberal Party. I look forward to your response. Thank you  Greg  +++$+++ Beleive me, I'm a pacifist and I don't want any war, conflict or arguement with anyone. I just don't want insults. I have a history of being bullied and it give me very sad memories and I'll sick and tired of this. That's another why I quit the Liberal Party. I look forward to your response. Thank you  Greg [[User:LibDeepThroat|LibDeepThroat]] 22:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
273479 +++$+++ LibDeepThroat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273478 +++$+++ 273478 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.170772140E09 +++$+++ My comments were not antagonistic. Adam on the contrary was antagonistic with what ever he was trying to say (still don't get it). But I found it very interesting that you didn't tell Adam off.  +++$+++ :My comments were not antagonistic. Adam on the contrary was antagonistic with what ever he was trying to say (still don't get it). But I found it very interesting that you didn't tell Adam off. [[User:LibDeepThroat|LibDeepThroat]] 06:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

535623 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535623 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-26 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.185513540E09 +++$+++ See [[WP:UP#NOT]]. All I'm doing is removing polemical statements from userpages. And while it's discouraged to edit other people's pages without permission, it's not prohibited. Thanks, ''' +++$+++ See [[WP:UP#NOT]]. All I'm doing is removing polemical statements from userpages. And while it's discouraged to edit other people's pages without permission, it's not prohibited. Thanks, '''[[User:Sceptre|Will]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 22:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
535624 +++$+++ Anittas +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535623 +++$+++ 535623 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.185514020E09 +++$+++ That is not official policy. -- +++$+++ :That is not official policy. --[[User:Anittas|Thus Spake Anittas]] 22:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
535625 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535623 +++$+++ 535624 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.185514140E09 +++$+++ I understand there is an active discussion on [[WP:AN\/I]]. I will keep an eye on it. Regards, -- +++$+++ ::I understand there is an active discussion on [[WP:AN/I]]. I will keep an eye on it. Regards, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 22:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
535626 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535623 +++$+++ 535624 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.185514560E09 +++$+++ It's a guideline. Which means you should follow it. The only difference between that and a policy is that a policy '''must''' be followed. Then again, why have that section when no-one bothers following it? ''' +++$+++ ::It's a guideline. Which means you should follow it. The only difference between that and a policy is that a policy '''must''' be followed. Then again, why have that section when no-one bothers following it? '''[[User:Sceptre|Will]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 22:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
535627 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535623 +++$+++ 535626 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.185514680E09 +++$+++ Please do not use my own talk page to reply to other users. Make your point at the ongoing AN\/I entry. Thanks! -- +++$+++ :::Please do not use my own talk page to reply to other users. Make your point at the ongoing AN/I entry. Thanks! --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 22:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
535628 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535623 +++$+++ 535623 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.186125000E09 +++$+++ Simply attribute it to wikipedia user \"Asterion\" and provide a link to my userpage http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Asterion.  Thanks, -- +++$+++ :Simply attribute it to wikipedia user "Asterion" and provide a link to my userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Asterion.  Thanks, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 00:10, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

11339 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-12 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.281618360E09 +++$+++ Hi Shsilver - I se you undidn my edit to this article. Any reason why mention of the urban myth isn't acceptable? Surely, given how widespread the myth seems tol be, WP has some form of duty to tell people that it's just a myth and has no truth.  +++$+++ Hi Shsilver - I se you undidn my edit to this article. Any reason why mention of the urban myth isn't acceptable? Surely, given how widespread the myth seems tol be, WP has some form of duty to tell people that it's just a myth and has no truth. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 06:06, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
11340 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11339 +++$+++ 11339 +++$+++ 2010-08-12 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.281679620E09 +++$+++ I can't see how refuting an urban myth in one sentence can be seen as giving undue weight to it. The myth is widely held; the aim of Wikipedia is to provide factual information for our readers. By failing to say that a widely held myth is false, we are failing in the aims of Wikipedia. Indeed, to deliberately ignore the myth is to indulge in far greater POV than to report its falsity. If you check WP:NPOV's section on undue weight, it states that \" It is important to clarify that articles should not give minority views ''as much'' or as detailed a description as more widely held views\" (italics in original. I hardly think that giving this myth one or two sentences in the midst of several paragraphs on the real origin of the flag is giving this myth anywhere near as much or as detailed a description.  +++$+++ :I can't see how refuting an urban myth in one sentence can be seen as giving undue weight to it. The myth is widely held; the aim of Wikipedia is to provide factual information for our readers. By failing to say that a widely held myth is false, we are failing in the aims of Wikipedia. Indeed, to deliberately ignore the myth is to indulge in far greater POV than to report its falsity. If you check WP:NPOV's section on undue weight, it states that " It is important to clarify that articles should not give minority views ''as much'' or as detailed a description as more widely held views" (italics in original. I hardly think that giving this myth one or two sentences in the midst of several paragraphs on the real origin of the flag is giving this myth anywhere near as much or as detailed a description. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 23:07, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

11341 +++$+++ JeremyA +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-27 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.282903260E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'm trying to get the [[Jean Baptiste Point du Sable]] article up to good article level. Can you think of anything else that it needs? One thing that I would like to get into the 'legacy and honors' section is something of how the African American community felt that Point du Sable was ignored by the City of Chicago, and the campaign to get him recognized as the city founder\u2014I'm having difficulty working out how to write this and compiling sources though. \u2014 +++$+++ Hi. I'm trying to get the [[Jean Baptiste Point du Sable]] article up to good article level. Can you think of anything else that it needs? One thing that I would like to get into the 'legacy and honors' section is something of how the African American community felt that Point du Sable was ignored by the City of Chicago, and the campaign to get him recognized as the city founder—I'm having difficulty working out how to write this and compiling sources though. —[[User:JeremyA|Jeremy]] <small>([[User talk:JeremyA|talk]])</small> 03:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
11342 +++$+++ JeremyA +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11341 +++$+++ 11341 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.282907880E09 +++$+++ The problem with writing anything about Point du Sable is that fact and fiction have become blurred. As far as I can tell the only historical record of Point du Sable's wife is the record of the blessing of their marriage at Cahokia in 1788\u2014here she is called Catherine, which I agree is obviously not her birth name. The name ''Kittihawa'' and the story of how Point du Sable met her comes from Shirley Graham's 1953 novel, which the author freely admits within the book is a work of her imagination\u2014unfortunately many websites and articles report the tales from this book as factual.\u2014 +++$+++ :The problem with writing anything about Point du Sable is that fact and fiction have become blurred. As far as I can tell the only historical record of Point du Sable's wife is the record of the blessing of their marriage at Cahokia in 1788—here she is called Catherine, which I agree is obviously not her birth name. The name ''Kittihawa'' and the story of how Point du Sable met her comes from Shirley Graham's 1953 novel, which the author freely admits within the book is a work of her imagination—unfortunately many websites and articles report the tales from this book as factual.—[[User:JeremyA|Jeremy]] <small>([[User talk:JeremyA|talk]])</small> 04:18, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

11343 +++$+++ Artemis-Arethusa +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-27 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.282965360E09 +++$+++ ... At '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion\/Log\/2010 August 27#Category:Clarion Writers&#39; Workshop|this entry on the page]]'''.  I was beginning to feel a little discouraged.  +++$+++ ... At '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 August 27#Category:Clarion Writers&#39; Workshop|this entry on the page]]'''.  I was beginning to feel a little discouraged. [[User:Artemis-Arethusa|Artemis-Arethusa]] ([[User talk:Artemis-Arethusa|talk]]) 20:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
11344 +++$+++ Artemis-Arethusa +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11343 +++$+++ 11343 +++$+++ 2010-09-08 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.284007800E09 +++$+++ And thank you for the link to the Clarion website list of people.  I had been planning to categorize the teachers of Clarion Original Flavor, West, and South, then the students of the same.  This will help, no doubt.  +++$+++ :And thank you for the link to the Clarion website list of people.  I had been planning to categorize the teachers of Clarion Original Flavor, West, and South, then the students of the same.  This will help, no doubt. [[User:Artemis-Arethusa|Artemis-Arethusa]] ([[User talk:Artemis-Arethusa|talk]]) 21:50, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
11345 +++$+++ Artemis-Arethusa +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11343 +++$+++ 11344 +++$+++ 2010-09-08 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.284008280E09 +++$+++ Ah, but I see you have already finished my job with the instructors.  Thank you very much.  +++$+++ ::Ah, but I see you have already finished my job with the instructors.  Thank you very much. [[User:Artemis-Arethusa|Artemis-Arethusa]] ([[User talk:Artemis-Arethusa|talk]]) 21:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

535633 +++$+++ Rjecina +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I have been looking User talk:UstashkiDom and on user talk is writen how it is not allowed for 1 user to have more accounts. If this is true can you block user Roremaster or Roramaster because this is 1 user with 2 accounts and he is editing only 3 or 4 articles ? ---- +++$+++ I have been looking User talk:UstashkiDom and on user talk is writen how it is not allowed for 1 user to have more accounts. If this is true can you block user Roremaster or Roramaster because this is 1 user with 2 accounts and he is editing only 3 or 4 articles ? ----[[User:Rjecina|Rjecina]] 19:55, 23.August 2007 (UTC)
535634 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535633 +++$+++ 535633 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.187924580E09 +++$+++ Done. I blocked the account with less edits. Let me know if abusing multiple accounts occurs. -- +++$+++ :Done. I blocked the account with less edits. Let me know if abusing multiple accounts occurs. --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 20:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
535635 +++$+++ Dina +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535633 +++$+++ 535634 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.187925960E09 +++$+++ I think [[User:UstashkiDom]] needs a little enforced Wikibreak.  Your thoughts? (since you've been dealing with him more)  +++$+++ ::I think [[User:UstashkiDom]] needs a little enforced Wikibreak.  Your thoughts? (since you've been dealing with him more) [[User:Dina|Dina]] 20:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
535636 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535633 +++$+++ 535635 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.187926200E09 +++$+++ My patience ran out too. I was blocking the account at the same time as you were. -- +++$+++ :::My patience ran out too. I was blocking the account at the same time as you were. --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 20:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
535637 +++$+++ Dina +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535633 +++$+++ 535636 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.187926380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for tagging the talk.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for tagging the talk. [[User:Dina|Dina]] 20:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

11347 +++$+++ 78.26 +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-07 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.286479260E09 +++$+++ I undid your edit on Morey Amsterdam regarding the date of death.  The date you list is given by IMDB and other secondary sources, however, when I did a little research on him I found that the newspaper obituaries at the time of his death actually list the 28th, noth the 27th.  I added these inline references (see \"Death\" section.)  Thanks!   +++$+++ I undid your edit on Morey Amsterdam regarding the date of death.  The date you list is given by IMDB and other secondary sources, however, when I did a little research on him I found that the newspaper obituaries at the time of his death actually list the 28th, noth the 27th.  I added these inline references (see "Death" section.)  Thanks!  [[User:78.26|78.26]] ([[User talk:78.26|talk]]) 12:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
11348 +++$+++ 78.26 +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11347 +++$+++ 11347 +++$+++ 2010-10-07 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.286485500E09 +++$+++ Major mea culpa.  Thanks.  I perhaps shouldn't edit right after waking up. (Shsilver actually had updated a date on the page I had overlooked)  +++$+++ : Major mea culpa.  Thanks.  I perhaps shouldn't edit right after waking up. (Shsilver actually had updated a date on the page I had overlooked) [[User:78.26|78.26]] ([[User talk:78.26|talk]]) 14:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

273493 +++$+++ Glen S +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.170950700E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, just read your message to Riana; do you really think overriding a declined RfA is a bad thing? I did it as a) People may think she's had failed RfA's in the past if it said [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Riana dzasta 3]] or even [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Riana dzasta 3|4]] as there has been [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Riana dzasta 2]] '''and''' [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Riana dzasta2]] (all three by  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, just read your message to Riana; do you really think overriding a declined RfA is a bad thing? I did it as a) People may think she's had failed RfA's in the past if it said [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Riana dzasta 3]] or even [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Riana dzasta 3|4]] as there has been [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Riana dzasta 2]] '''and''' [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Riana dzasta2]] (all three by [[User:Spawn Man]]), those two immediately ''after'' she declined the first one (which I dont think is really fair), and, b) because I'm certain she's ready[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Glen_S&diff=106308298&oldid=106284759]. As you are the reigning nomination queen I'd certainly appreciate your input here :) '''[[User talk:Glen S|Glen]]''' 08:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
273494 +++$+++ Glen S +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273493 +++$+++ 273493 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.170951900E09 +++$+++ He didn't start them? How bizarre! Yes, I really don't see point in them, especially as they are duplicates. Funny, your thinking that people hold weird things against others in RfAs was ''exactly'' the reason why I didn't make it #3 or #4! ;) I've added a note re the prior declined nominationto the nom under General comments for clarification - however if anyone takes issue with this I will move the entire thing (will probably have to delete the old, move the page, then restore the old into its former position to keep it all intact). But hopefully the note is enough to keep it all kosher. Thanks for your reply :) ''' +++$+++ :He didn't start them? How bizarre! Yes, I really don't see point in them, especially as they are duplicates. Funny, your thinking that people hold weird things against others in RfAs was ''exactly'' the reason why I didn't make it #3 or #4! ;) I've added a note re the prior declined nominationto the nom under General comments for clarification - however if anyone takes issue with this I will move the entire thing (will probably have to delete the old, move the page, then restore the old into its former position to keep it all intact). But hopefully the note is enough to keep it all kosher. Thanks for your reply :) '''[[User talk:Glen S|Glen]]''' 08:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
273495 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273493 +++$+++ 273494 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.170958740E09 +++$+++ Don't mind if you do, Sarah :) <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ ::Don't mind if you do, Sarah :) <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|'''dzasta''']]</span> 10:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
273496 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273493 +++$+++ 273495 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.170972600E09 +++$+++ 200! No pressure at all, I'm sure. Let me just pull a featured article out of thin air first... :p <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ :::200! No pressure at all, I'm sure. Let me just pull a featured article out of thin air first... :p <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|'''dzasta''']]</span> 14:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

535638 +++$+++ Tazmaniacs +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-24 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.187943540E09 +++$+++ Hola! Thanks for your changes to [[Montejurra]], more references are welcome! However, instead of deleting ref, let's cumulate them! Two refs are always better than one, especially for controversial subjects like that. Your ref to the Economist is interesting, would you have the date by any chance? Que te vaya bien, seguro nos encontramos por otros lados del wiki! PS: tienes alguna idea de quienes son el [[Partido Carlista de Euskalherria-EKA]] ? Hay k trabajar sobre los articulos acerca de los Carlistas, y la verdad que para alguien k no sepa mucho sobre este asunto, se pierde muy facilmente...  +++$+++ Hola! Thanks for your changes to [[Montejurra]], more references are welcome! However, instead of deleting ref, let's cumulate them! Two refs are always better than one, especially for controversial subjects like that. Your ref to the Economist is interesting, would you have the date by any chance? Que te vaya bien, seguro nos encontramos por otros lados del wiki! PS: tienes alguna idea de quienes son el [[Partido Carlista de Euskalherria-EKA]] ? Hay k trabajar sobre los articulos acerca de los Carlistas, y la verdad que para alguien k no sepa mucho sobre este asunto, se pierde muy facilmente... [[User:Tazmaniacs|Tazmaniacs]] 01:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
535639 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535638 +++$+++ 535638 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.187961960E09 +++$+++ El problema es que la referencia que borr\xe9 ya no existe[http:\/\/www.montejurra-jurramendi.3a2.com]. A lo mejor es posible acceder a ella a trav\xe9s de archive.org pero no lo he intentado. Regarding [[Partido Carlista de Euskalherria-EKA]], I guess it is either the local branch or a splint-off of Carlos Hugo's original Carlist Party. In any case, I would be surprised if it has got any popular support or else, as since the PC entry in IU and prompt exit, the PC has been basically non-existent (I even doubt they have actually contested any local seats since then). Also, would it not make more sense to rename the article Montejurra events, considering that 90% of its content refers to the massacre and not the remembrance yearly acts? Regards, -- +++$+++ :El problema es que la referencia que borré ya no existe[http://www.montejurra-jurramendi.3a2.com]. A lo mejor es posible acceder a ella a través de archive.org pero no lo he intentado. Regarding [[Partido Carlista de Euskalherria-EKA]], I guess it is either the local branch or a splint-off of Carlos Hugo's original Carlist Party. In any case, I would be surprised if it has got any popular support or else, as since the PC entry in IU and prompt exit, the PC has been basically non-existent (I even doubt they have actually contested any local seats since then). Also, would it not make more sense to rename the article Montejurra events, considering that 90% of its content refers to the massacre and not the remembrance yearly acts? Regards, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 06:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
535640 +++$+++ Tazmaniacs +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535638 +++$+++ 535639 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.187970720E09 +++$+++ De acuerdo para el cambio de nombre,\xbf tal vez [[Massacre de Montejurra]] es m\xe1s preciso?  +++$+++ ::De acuerdo para el cambio de nombre,¿ tal vez [[Massacre de Montejurra]] es más preciso? [[User:Tazmaniacs|Tazmaniacs]] 08:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
535641 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535638 +++$+++ 535640 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.188002640E09 +++$+++ Preferir\xeda el nombre [[1976 Montejurra events]] como t\xedtulo para ser m\xe1s precisos y neutrales, a la par crear ''redirections'' desde [[Montejurra massacre]], [[1976 Montejurra massacre]] o incluso [[Montejurra 76]] (he visto este unas cuantas veces).  -- +++$+++ :::Preferiría el nombre [[1976 Montejurra events]] como título para ser más precisos y neutrales, a la par crear ''redirections'' desde [[Montejurra massacre]], [[1976 Montejurra massacre]] o incluso [[Montejurra 76]] (he visto este unas cuantas veces).  --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 17:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

11351 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-02 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.291354020E09 +++$+++ I added the new cat to [[Thespis (opera)]] and [[The Grand Duke]].  What about Iolanthe?  The Libretto says that Act I is set in \"An Arcadian Landscape\".  Iolanthe says that she lives at the bottom of a stream to be near her son, Strephon, who is an \"Arcadian shepherd\"  However, the peers come by, so maybe we're just in a suburb of London called \"Arcadia\"?  I'm going to add it.  Take it out if you disagree.  Happy editing!  --  +++$+++ I added the new cat to [[Thespis (opera)]] and [[The Grand Duke]].  What about Iolanthe?  The Libretto says that Act I is set in "An Arcadian Landscape".  Iolanthe says that she lives at the bottom of a stream to be near her son, Strephon, who is an "Arcadian shepherd"  However, the peers come by, so maybe we're just in a suburb of London called "Arcadia"?  I'm going to add it.  Take it out if you disagree.  Happy editing!  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 21:27, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
11352 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11351 +++$+++ 11351 +++$+++ 2010-12-02 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.291355760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message.  I added it to Ida.  See: [['u' (opera)]].  LOL.  Definitely my silliest article ever!  I added the cat there - it's a Klingon myth, though, including the Underworld.  Is that ok?  --  +++$+++ :Thanks for the message.  I added it to Ida.  See: [['u' (opera)]].  LOL.  Definitely my silliest article ever!  I added the cat there - it's a Klingon myth, though, including the Underworld.  Is that ok?  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 21:56, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

273497 +++$+++ Indianahighschoolgameday +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.170996780E09 +++$+++ Sarah, thank you for the support. South Knox is involved in our game of the week this week. It warmed our heart to know that there was someone out there that listened to the little guy.  +++$+++ Sarah, thank you for the support. South Knox is involved in our game of the week this week. It warmed our heart to know that there was someone out there that listened to the little guy. [[User:Indianahighschoolgameday|Indianahighschoolgameday]] 20:53, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
273498 +++$+++ Parker007 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273497 +++$+++ 273497 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.170988080E09 +++$+++ Sorry My apologies. -- +++$+++ :Sorry My apologies. --[[User:Parker007|Parker007]] 18:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

535643 +++$+++ TheFEARgod +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-28 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.188359820E09 +++$+++ OK, but still I find it important and appropriate to have a notification for other people to see that it is unacceptable. -- +++$+++ OK, but still I find it important and appropriate to have a notification for other people to see that it is unacceptable. --[[User:TheFEARgod|<font color="#003399">The'''FE'''</font><font color="red">'''AR'''god</font>]] ([[User talk:TheFEARgod|'''Ч''']]) 20:57, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
535644 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535643 +++$+++ 535643 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.188359940E09 +++$+++ No worries. I thought it was a note left to the user. I would not mind to block the account as inappropriate username but I would rather the user to make an effort and request a name change on their own. Cheers, -- +++$+++ :No worries. I thought it was a note left to the user. I would not mind to block the account as inappropriate username but I would rather the user to make an effort and request a name change on their own. Cheers, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 20:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

11356 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-19 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.295499000E09 +++$+++ Thanx, AgSteve. I suspect that if I had spare time, I'd find a lot more wikilinks (some of them to articles I created or expanded) could be added to Hugo winner\/nominee lists. (As it is, I'm getting ready for Chattacon [and perhaps you're doing the same for ConFusion?].) -- +++$+++ Thanx, AgSteve. I suspect that if I had spare time, I'd find a lot more wikilinks (some of them to articles I created or expanded) could be added to Hugo winner/nominee lists. (As it is, I'm getting ready for Chattacon [and perhaps you're doing the same for ConFusion?].) --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  &#x007C;  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 20:50, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
11357 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11356 +++$+++ 11356 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.295992740E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 13:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

535645 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-23 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.187915520E09 +++$+++ I hope you are having a nice Summer. Weather is all miserable in England for a change... Thanks a lot for the support at [[Talk:Spanish literature]]. I have been away from wikipedia for quite a few months. Now that I have some more time, I am trying to expand and clean-up some articles. I have recently got access to several [http:\/\/library.open.ac.uk\/resources\/databases.html databases] and [http:\/\/library.open.ac.uk\/resources\/ejournals\/ejournals.html electronic journals]. So if you need anything, just drop me a line or two. Cheers, -- +++$+++ I hope you are having a nice Summer. Weather is all miserable in England for a change... Thanks a lot for the support at [[Talk:Spanish literature]]. I have been away from wikipedia for quite a few months. Now that I have some more time, I am trying to expand and clean-up some articles. I have recently got access to several [http://library.open.ac.uk/resources/databases.html databases] and [http://library.open.ac.uk/resources/ejournals/ejournals.html electronic journals]. So if you need anything, just drop me a line or two. Cheers, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 17:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
535646 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535645 +++$+++ 535645 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.188384420E09 +++$+++ Oh great i'll surely ''bother'' you from time to time. --  +++$+++ :Oh great i'll surely ''bother'' you from time to time. -- [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold"><sup>''Wiki me up®''</sup></font>]]</small> 03:47, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

273503 +++$+++ Tachikoma +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.170989280E09 +++$+++ The RfA process is harsh, and I think unavoidably so, because candidates have to undergo such scrutiny and face criticism by people they've never met. Perhaps with some changes to the RfA explanatory text, lesser-experienced Wikipedians will be better able to understand the process and judge whether or not to proceed, and hopefully spare themselves from undue stress. Again, I'd welcome both your comments.-- +++$+++ The RfA process is harsh, and I think unavoidably so, because candidates have to undergo such scrutiny and face criticism by people they've never met. Perhaps with some changes to the RfA explanatory text, lesser-experienced Wikipedians will be better able to understand the process and judge whether or not to proceed, and hopefully spare themselves from undue stress. Again, I'd welcome both your comments.--[[User:Tachikoma|<font face="arial" color="#8652b9">''Kyok''</font>]][[User talk:Tachikoma|<font face="arial" color="#BA55D3">''o''</font>]] 18:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
273504 +++$+++ Tachikoma +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273503 +++$+++ 273503 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.171122300E09 +++$+++ I still think the text could use some modification, especially in making clear the need for experience, but at the same time, I don't want to turn this into \"gaming the system\". -- +++$+++ :I still think the text could use some modification, especially in making clear the need for experience, but at the same time, I don't want to turn this into "gaming the system". --[[User:Tachikoma|<font face="arial" color="#8652b9">''Kyok''</font>]][[User talk:Tachikoma|<font face="arial" color="#BA55D3">''o''</font>]] 07:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
273505 +++$+++ Tachikoma +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273503 +++$+++ 273504 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 08:40:00 +++$+++ 1.171125600E09 +++$+++ I've just put up the text at [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship]]. I think the subject title was \"proposed text for RfA page\". I remember your RfA, and I think I even supported you during it. I can understand why it would be a stressful process, which is partially why I don't want to become an administrator in the future. Thanks for your feedback. -- +++$+++ ::I've just put up the text at [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship]]. I think the subject title was "proposed text for RfA page". I remember your RfA, and I think I even supported you during it. I can understand why it would be a stressful process, which is partially why I don't want to become an administrator in the future. Thanks for your feedback. --[[User:Tachikoma|<font face="arial" color="#8652b9">''Kyok''</font>]][[User talk:Tachikoma|<font face="arial" color="#BA55D3">''o''</font>]] 08:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

11360 +++$+++ Hullaballoo Wolfowitz +++$+++ Shsilver +++$+++ 11360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-29 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.304131920E09 +++$+++ Please see my comments at [[WP:BLPN]] as well as OrangeMike's talk page. This isn't a new issue in principle, and I'm going by the same standards we applied for [[Diana Wynne Jones]] just last month.  +++$+++ Please see my comments at [[WP:BLPN]] as well as OrangeMike's talk page. This isn't a new issue in principle, and I'm going by the same standards we applied for [[Diana Wynne Jones]] just last month. [[User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|Hullaballoo Wolfowitz]] ([[User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|talk]]) 19:52, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
11361 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11360 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.272041460E09 +++$+++ I'm thinking old pictures from 100 years ago. [[List of countries' copyright length|Anything before 1923]] is public domain, if they can be found. It's a matter of digging them up from archives.  +++$+++ :::I'm thinking old pictures from 100 years ago. [[List of countries' copyright length|Anything before 1923]] is public domain, if they can be found. It's a matter of digging them up from archives. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 09:51, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

535650 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.189785060E09 +++$+++ Could you please spend a moment to add your 2 cents to [[Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#Sections vs. collections]] and also [[Wikipedia:Requested moves#September 12, 2007]]? I think that you had strong opinions on this matter on [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion\/Template:Trivia]]. I understand that you are in favour of trivia on Wikipedia, but I may be mistaken. I am the direct opposite, but in the interest of community consensus I'm letting you know of these two pages where debate is continuing. -  +++$+++ Could you please spend a moment to add your 2 cents to [[Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#Sections vs. collections]] and also [[Wikipedia:Requested moves#September 12, 2007]]? I think that you had strong opinions on this matter on [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Template:Trivia]]. I understand that you are in favour of trivia on Wikipedia, but I may be mistaken. I am the direct opposite, but in the interest of community consensus I'm letting you know of these two pages where debate is continuing. - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 08:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
535651 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535650 +++$+++ 535650 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.189824360E09 +++$+++ I have no strong feelings about trivia but I found the Template:Trivia far more disruptive than most trivia sections. My criteria is to use common sense when deciding on whether something adds any encyclopedic value to an article. But as I said before, I oppose one-size-fits-all solutions. Thanks, -- +++$+++ :I have no strong feelings about trivia but I found the Template:Trivia far more disruptive than most trivia sections. My criteria is to use common sense when deciding on whether something adds any encyclopedic value to an article. But as I said before, I oppose one-size-fits-all solutions. Thanks, --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 19:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

11363 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11363 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-02 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.275462180E09 +++$+++ }}  <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ }}  <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 00:03, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
11364 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11363 +++$+++ 11363 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.275462960E09 +++$+++ Honored, I am sure.  +++$+++ : Honored, I am sure. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 00:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
11365 +++$+++ Kohoutek1138 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11363 +++$+++ 11363 +++$+++ 2010-06-09 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.276126200E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry to bother you with this kind of crap, since I realise that you have only recently become involved with the ongoing series of disruptive edits by [[User:QueryOne|QueryOne]], but I'm obliged to notify you that I've mentioned your user name on the Administraor's noticeboard. -- +++$+++ :I'm sorry to bother you with this kind of crap, since I realise that you have only recently become involved with the ongoing series of disruptive edits by [[User:QueryOne|QueryOne]], but I'm obliged to notify you that I've mentioned your user name on the Administraor's noticeboard. --[[User:Kohoutek1138|Kohoutek1138]] ([[User talk:Kohoutek1138|talk]]) 16:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

535652 +++$+++ Giovanni Giove +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-18 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.190148600E09 +++$+++ The RfC results are quite clear, ad you can judge on your own. I suppose the page shall be unblocked and restored to a more correct version. Regards. -- +++$+++ The RfC results are quite clear, ad you can judge on your own. I suppose the page shall be unblocked and restored to a more correct version. Regards. --[[User:Giovanni Giove|Giovanni Giove]] 13:50, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
535653 +++$+++ Giovanni Giove +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535652 +++$+++ 535652 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.190319720E09 +++$+++ I repeat the above request. Please, have a look to the conclusions, otherwise suggest me the way to stop RfC that appears to be concluded.-- +++$+++ :I repeat the above request. Please, have a look to the conclusions, otherwise suggest me the way to stop RfC that appears to be concluded.--[[User:Giovanni Giove|Giovanni Giove]] 13:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
535654 +++$+++ DIREKTOR +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535652 +++$+++ 535653 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.190326860E09 +++$+++ This guy childishly writes \"'''Conclusion'''\" in the RfC, writes something that goes with his own beliefs, and then calles in any random Admin hoping he might quickly take a look at only his \"Conclusion\". It is imperative for him that you act quickly before someone can say that '''there is no conclusion drawn yet''', hence the repeated request. In short, he is ''lying'', the RfC does '''NOT''' \"appear to be concluded\". <font face=\"Eras Bold ITC\"> +++$+++ ::This guy childishly writes "'''Conclusion'''" in the RfC, writes something that goes with his own beliefs, and then calles in any random Admin hoping he might quickly take a look at only his "Conclusion". It is imperative for him that you act quickly before someone can say that '''there is no conclusion drawn yet''', hence the repeated request. In short, he is ''lying'', the RfC does '''NOT''' "appear to be concluded". <font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:DIREKTOR|<font color="DimGray">DIREKTOR</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DIREKTOR|<font color="Gray">TALK</font>]])</sup></font> 15:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
535655 +++$+++ Giovanni Giove +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535652 +++$+++ 535654 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.190333280E09 +++$+++ Give also a look to the offensive sentences against me, posted in the RfC. All the user agree that the possible birth in Curzola is baseless. Just DIREKTOR  and Zem. refuse to face the evidence. You can judge on your own.-- +++$+++ :::Give also a look to the offensive sentences against me, posted in the RfC. All the user agree that the possible birth in Curzola is baseless. Just DIREKTOR  and Zem. refuse to face the evidence. You can judge on your own.--[[User:Giovanni Giove|Giovanni Giove]] 17:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
535656 +++$+++ DIREKTOR +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535652 +++$+++ 535655 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.190404860E09 +++$+++ Oh come on, Giove! The only ones that agree are you and your (not so radical) friend, and you both belong to one side of the argument. The other side ([[User:Zenanarh]] and me) does '''NOT''' agree with your \"conclusion\". Its all there, FFS, why do you ''constantly'' try to biase people so childishly? An Admin will ''check'' your claims, you know... <font face=\"Eras Bold ITC\"> +++$+++ ::::Oh come on, Giove! The only ones that agree are you and your (not so radical) friend, and you both belong to one side of the argument. The other side ([[User:Zenanarh]] and me) does '''NOT''' agree with your "conclusion". Its all there, FFS, why do you ''constantly'' try to biase people so childishly? An Admin will ''check'' your claims, you know... <font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:DIREKTOR|<font color="DimGray">DIREKTOR</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DIREKTOR|<font color="Gray">TALK</font>]])</sup></font> 13:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

273509 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273509 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-10 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.171118520E09 +++$+++ Just thought I'd draw your attention to this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=St_Paul%27s_School%2C_Bald_Hills&diff=107028434&oldid=106776763 \"Recent controversies\" section] which I've deleted!  +++$+++ Just thought I'd draw your attention to this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St_Paul%27s_School%2C_Bald_Hills&diff=107028434&oldid=106776763 "Recent controversies" section] which I've deleted! [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 06:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
273510 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273509 +++$+++ 273509 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.171121100E09 +++$+++ Ah!  +++$+++ :Ah! [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 07:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

11367 +++$+++ Kohoutek1138 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-25 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.277492340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message of support. I'm glad it's not just me. I'm finding the whole sorry affair extremely draining and annoying. I've been a regular contributor on Wikipedia for 16 months now and up until very recently, I'd only ever encountered editors who were polite, friendly, and eager to communicate and reach consensus over editing disagreements. Why can't all folks be like that? Is it really so hard? My recent clashes with {{user|Jetblack500}} are doubly annoying because I (and several other Wikipedians) have only recently endured similar trouble with {{user|QueryOne}} (see my earlier message to you above). Actually, there's a funny coincidence there...JetBlack500 and QueryOne both created Wiki accounts within five days of each other and both seem hell bent on making pedantic and disruptive edits to [[The Left Banke]] and its related articles. Very strange, but I'm sure there's nothing sinister in that. Anyway, thanks again for your comments. -- +++$+++ Thanks for the message of support. I'm glad it's not just me. I'm finding the whole sorry affair extremely draining and annoying. I've been a regular contributor on Wikipedia for 16 months now and up until very recently, I'd only ever encountered editors who were polite, friendly, and eager to communicate and reach consensus over editing disagreements. Why can't all folks be like that? Is it really so hard? My recent clashes with {{user|Jetblack500}} are doubly annoying because I (and several other Wikipedians) have only recently endured similar trouble with {{user|QueryOne}} (see my earlier message to you above). Actually, there's a funny coincidence there...JetBlack500 and QueryOne both created Wiki accounts within five days of each other and both seem hell bent on making pedantic and disruptive edits to [[The Left Banke]] and its related articles. Very strange, but I'm sure there's nothing sinister in that. Anyway, thanks again for your comments. --[[User:Kohoutek1138|Kohoutek1138]] ([[User talk:Kohoutek1138|talk]]) 11:59, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
11368 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11367 +++$+++ 11367 +++$+++ 2010-06-25 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.277516940E09 +++$+++ Back in the 70s I used to have a bit of paper I'd found with something called the [[Mazdaznan]] Code. It set out a few rules for a healthy & happy life. As well as some dietary tips etc it suggested that one never EVER get involved in litigation of any kind. Good advice! JetBlack500's manically defended trite copy-edits are just not worth fighting over, altho one can't help getting a grin over the apoplexy of it all. I think one has to extend that she (and I am just intuiting it is a she) is nevertheless editing in good faith. As Plato reputedly said \"Be kind to those you meet, for everyone is having a hard struggle\".  One LB-related article on my todo list you might like to look at is [[Alan Merrill]]. Needs inline citations, mostly to Merrill's website, adding.  +++$+++ : Back in the 70s I used to have a bit of paper I'd found with something called the [[Mazdaznan]] Code. It set out a few rules for a healthy & happy life. As well as some dietary tips etc it suggested that one never EVER get involved in litigation of any kind. Good advice! JetBlack500's manically defended trite copy-edits are just not worth fighting over, altho one can't help getting a grin over the apoplexy of it all. I think one has to extend that she (and I am just intuiting it is a she) is nevertheless editing in good faith. As Plato reputedly said "Be kind to those you meet, for everyone is having a hard struggle".  One LB-related article on my todo list you might like to look at is [[Alan Merrill]]. Needs inline citations, mostly to Merrill's website, adding. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 18:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
11369 +++$+++ Kohoutek1138 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11367 +++$+++ 11368 +++$+++ 2010-06-26 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.277574960E09 +++$+++ Wise words, indeed. Funny that you assumed that this user is a she, whereas I automatically assumed they were male. Ah well, one of us is definitely right! ;-) -- +++$+++ ::Wise words, indeed. Funny that you assumed that this user is a she, whereas I automatically assumed they were male. Ah well, one of us is definitely right! ;-) --[[User:Kohoutek1138|Kohoutek1138]] ([[User talk:Kohoutek1138|talk]]) 10:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
11370 +++$+++ Kohoutek1138 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11367 +++$+++ 11369 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.277777100E09 +++$+++ Just so you know, Jetblack500 has transcluded our discussion about the origin of The Left Banke on his talk page to [[Talk:The Left Banke]] to generate debate between other editors. Since you're mentioned there, I thought that you should know incase you want to add your tupence worth. He's also deleted the entire discussion from his talk page which seems like bad form to me. -- +++$+++ :::Just so you know, Jetblack500 has transcluded our discussion about the origin of The Left Banke on his talk page to [[Talk:The Left Banke]] to generate debate between other editors. Since you're mentioned there, I thought that you should know incase you want to add your tupence worth. He's also deleted the entire discussion from his talk page which seems like bad form to me. --[[User:Kohoutek1138|Kohoutek1138]] ([[User talk:Kohoutek1138|talk]]) 19:05, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

11371 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-29 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.277881020E09 +++$+++ ''\"I've had enough of this issue though, so I'm going to let it go\"'' - While not conceding the point, an admission of defeat. Plus a potential snooker with the \"influenced by\" misapprehension. Congratulations!  +++$+++ ''"I've had enough of this issue though, so I'm going to let it go"'' - While not conceding the point, an admission of defeat. Plus a potential snooker with the "influenced by" misapprehension. Congratulations! [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 23:57, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
11372 +++$+++ Kohoutek1138 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11371 +++$+++ 11371 +++$+++ 2010-07-01 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.278013080E09 +++$+++ I can't actually see where Jetblack500 said \"I've had enough of this issue though, so I'm going to let it go\" but regardless, if he's happy to leave it as it is, so much the better. The \"influenced by\" misapprehension is really worrying to my mind...I really do suspect that this mistake of his\/hers may've been the root cause of all this conflict\u2014which is just really stupid. Anyway, thanks for your support. -- +++$+++ :I can't actually see where Jetblack500 said "I've had enough of this issue though, so I'm going to let it go" but regardless, if he's happy to leave it as it is, so much the better. The "influenced by" misapprehension is really worrying to my mind...I really do suspect that this mistake of his/hers may've been the root cause of all this conflict—which is just really stupid. Anyway, thanks for your support. --[[User:Kohoutek1138|Kohoutek1138]] ([[User talk:Kohoutek1138|talk]]) 12:38, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
11373 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11371 +++$+++ 11372 +++$+++ 2010-07-01 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.278039300E09 +++$+++ That was immediately \"archived\" [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Jetblack500&oldid=371106646] :)  +++$+++ :: That was immediately "archived" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jetblack500&oldid=371106646] :) [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 19:55, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
11374 +++$+++ Kohoutek1138 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11371 +++$+++ 11373 +++$+++ 2010-07-02 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.278093780E09 +++$+++ Heh...along with a snarky comment about me being on some kind of medication. Nice. :-) -- +++$+++ :::Heh...along with a snarky comment about me being on some kind of medication. Nice. :-) --[[User:Kohoutek1138|Kohoutek1138]] ([[User talk:Kohoutek1138|talk]]) 11:03, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

535662 +++$+++ Kurihaya +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535662 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-14 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.192409940E09 +++$+++ Good evening, Asterion. I am [[ja:User:Kurihaya]], a Japanese Wikipedia user. I will appreciate you if you allow me to post your image file \"''Horse in stable.jpg''\" to Wikimedia Commons in your stead. I edit the article for \"bandage (horse)\" in ja:Wikipedia [[ja:\u80a2\u5dfb|here]] and your image file will help us much. Regards and best wishes, -- +++$+++ Good evening, Asterion. I am [[ja:User:Kurihaya]], a Japanese Wikipedia user. I will appreciate you if you allow me to post your image file "''Horse in stable.jpg''" to Wikimedia Commons in your stead. I edit the article for "bandage (horse)" in ja:Wikipedia [[ja:肢巻|here]] and your image file will help us much. Regards and best wishes, --[[User:Kurihaya|Kurihaya]] 17:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
535663 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535662 +++$+++ 535662 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.192431660E09 +++$+++ Yes, of course. Feel free to do do. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Yes, of course. Feel free to do do. Thanks, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 00:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
535664 +++$+++ Kurihaya +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535662 +++$+++ 535663 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 08:50:00 +++$+++ 1.192463400E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, Asterion. I posted your image file to Commons, [[:commons:Image:Horse_in_stable.jpg|here]], categorizing in [[:commons:Category:Horse_equipment]] and [[:commons:Category:Horse]]. Please confirm the license is properly granted. Then I edited [[ja:\u80a2\u5dfb|the article]] in ja:Wikipedia. Thank you again. -- +++$+++ ::Thank you very much, Asterion. I posted your image file to Commons, [[:commons:Image:Horse_in_stable.jpg|here]], categorizing in [[:commons:Category:Horse_equipment]] and [[:commons:Category:Horse]]. Please confirm the license is properly granted. Then I edited [[ja:肢巻|the article]] in ja:Wikipedia. Thank you again. --[[User:Kurihaya|Kurihaya]] 08:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

11375 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-30 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.280521800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note. I deleted the original in April 2009 and had, I admit, not kept it in the forefront of my consciousness! --<font color=\"Red\"> +++$+++ Thanks for the note. I deleted the original in April 2009 and had, I admit, not kept it in the forefront of my consciousness! --<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony.bradbury|'''Anthony.bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 13:30, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
11376 +++$+++ Dthomsen8 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11375 +++$+++ 11375 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.282947600E09 +++$+++ \"...on using wikis to  create digital resources for New York City's 350 neighborhoods\" is a great topic, and I will attend to learn how to apply your ideas to Philadelphia, but it deserves more than 5 minutes. -- +++$+++ : "...on using wikis to  create digital resources for New York City's 350 neighborhoods" is a great topic, and I will attend to learn how to apply your ideas to Philadelphia, but it deserves more than 5 minutes. --[[User:Dthomsen8|DThomsen8]] ([[User talk:Dthomsen8|talk]]) 15:20, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
11377 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11375 +++$+++ 11376 +++$+++ 2010-08-30 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.283182200E09 +++$+++ I suggest that you join the [http:\/\/NYCwiki.org NYCwiki] itself, and watch\/help us thrash it out.  +++$+++ :: I suggest that you join the [http://NYCwiki.org NYCwiki] itself, and watch/help us thrash it out. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 08:30, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

535665 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535665 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-01 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.193953080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Charles01|Charles01]] 14:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
535666 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535665 +++$+++ 535665 +++$+++ 2007-11-01 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.193969460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. In all honesty, there is no need to ask me about it. Your picture is indeed much better. By any chance, have you got one where the 127 is photographed in an angle (i.e. showing the front and the side of the car)? Best regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know. In all honesty, there is no need to ask me about it. Your picture is indeed much better. By any chance, have you got one where the 127 is photographed in an angle (i.e. showing the front and the side of the car)? Best regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 19:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
535667 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535665 +++$+++ 535666 +++$+++ 2007-11-01 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.193969820E09 +++$+++ Also, any chance of working out some magic and finding any old shots of a 124? :) -- +++$+++ ::Also, any chance of working out some magic and finding any old shots of a 124? :) --[[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 19:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
535668 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535665 +++$+++ 535666 +++$+++ 2007-11-01 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.193971140E09 +++$+++ Regards  +++$+++ ::Regards [[User:Charles01|Charles01]] 19:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
535669 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535665 +++$+++ 535668 +++$+++ 2007-11-01 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.193971860E09 +++$+++ When I was living in Spain, my next door neighboor used to own a 127. Funnily enough, I never thought about taking any pictures. I do regret it now. I now own a [[Zastava 311]], which looks remarkably similar when look from the front (see [[:Image:Zastava Yugo 311 1116cc.jpg]]). Cheers,  +++$+++ :::When I was living in Spain, my next door neighboor used to own a 127. Funnily enough, I never thought about taking any pictures. I do regret it now. I now own a [[Zastava 311]], which looks remarkably similar when look from the front (see [[:Image:Zastava Yugo 311 1116cc.jpg]]). Cheers, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 19:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
535670 +++$+++ Charles01 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535665 +++$+++ 535669 +++$+++ 2007-11-01 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.193976120E09 +++$+++ Understood: thanks for persisiting on this because I agree that you're right.  I've added the best 124 photo I could muster.   Actually I think it's perfectly ok (the photo) if not a particular stunner.   Anyhow, it's not of a Lada.   It's got 'Fiat' written on the front.   As for photographing your neighbours' cars ... one can get some strange reactions!   Saludatos +++$+++ ::::Understood: thanks for persisiting on this because I agree that you're right.  I've added the best 124 photo I could muster.   Actually I think it's perfectly ok (the photo) if not a particular stunner.   Anyhow, it's not of a Lada.   It's got 'Fiat' written on the front.   As for photographing your neighbours' cars ... one can get some strange reactions!   Saludatos[[User:Charles01|Charles01]] 21:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
535671 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535665 +++$+++ 535670 +++$+++ 2007-11-01 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.193976300E09 +++$+++ It is a beautiful shot. Thanks very much,  +++$+++ :::::It is a beautiful shot. Thanks very much, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 21:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

11378 +++$+++ SQGibbon +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-13 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.284444300E09 +++$+++ I did some work on the [[Punk Rock Records]] article.  Basically I just stubifyed it and removed blatant copy vio and COI material.  There was drama concerning the images in those articles which I guess is taken care of now.   +++$+++ I did some work on the [[Punk Rock Records]] article.  Basically I just stubifyed it and removed blatant copy vio and COI material.  There was drama concerning the images in those articles which I guess is taken care of now.  [[User:SQGibbon|SQGibbon]] ([[User talk:SQGibbon|talk]]) 23:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
11379 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11378 +++$+++ 11378 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.284457620E09 +++$+++ Good work. I've watchlisted it.  +++$+++ : Good work. I've watchlisted it. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 02:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

11380 +++$+++ Pjoef +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11380 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-23 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.285272960E09 +++$+++ Hi! As a member of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject The Clash|WikiProject:The Clash]], [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_The_Clash#The_Clash_articles_have_been_selected_for_the_Wikipedia_0.8_release|I thought I would draw your attention to a discussion about the articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for the offline release of the encyclopedia. If you get a moment, could you please pop in and give your opinion]]? Thanks!!! \u2013 +++$+++ Hi! As a member of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject The Clash|WikiProject:The Clash]], [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_The_Clash#The_Clash_articles_have_been_selected_for_the_Wikipedia_0.8_release|I thought I would draw your attention to a discussion about the articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for the offline release of the encyclopedia. If you get a moment, could you please pop in and give your opinion]]? Thanks!!! –[[User:Pjoef|p<span style="color: #802400">joe</span>f]] <small>(''[[User talk:Pjoef|talk]]'' • [[Special:Contributions/Pjoef|contribs]])</small> 13:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
11381 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11380 +++$+++ 11380 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.286931660E09 +++$+++ I won't be able to make it. WordCampNYC.  +++$+++ : I won't be able to make it. WordCampNYC. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 18:01, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

11382 +++$+++ manstaruk +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11382 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-30 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.288451100E09 +++$+++ I feel that the sudden insertion of such an edit by an IP address, that hasnt much of a history, was just such, and was therfore reverted.   Furthermore, placing of such tags. without any effort to correct such, to me, is a example of a major fault of Wikipedia.    -- +++$+++ I feel that the sudden insertion of such an edit by an IP address, that hasnt much of a history, was just such, and was therfore reverted.   Furthermore, placing of such tags. without any effort to correct such, to me, is a example of a major fault of Wikipedia.    --[[User:manstaruk|Keith]] 08:05, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
11383 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11382 +++$+++ 11382 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.288499820E09 +++$+++ The tags are nevertheless valid. That they were made by an anon IP is not grounds to remove them. Your feelings notwithstanding. They could be combined in to one multiple tag.  +++$+++ : The tags are nevertheless valid. That they were made by an anon IP is not grounds to remove them. Your feelings notwithstanding. They could be combined in to one multiple tag. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 21:37, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

273527 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-12 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.171338420E09 +++$+++ If I tag [[Mrs.Fowler|this page]] for speedy deletion, will it be the right thing to do? It looks like a promotion-page to me.  +++$+++ If I tag [[Mrs.Fowler|this page]] for speedy deletion, will it be the right thing to do? It looks like a promotion-page to me. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
273528 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273527 +++$+++ 273527 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.171339260E09 +++$+++ Okay. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Okay. Thanks. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:01, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
273529 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273527 +++$+++ 273528 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.171340220E09 +++$+++ That's a big help! I'll know exactly what to do next time! Thanks.  +++$+++ ::That's a big help! I'll know exactly what to do next time! Thanks. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

535672 +++$+++ Bluegoblin7 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-02 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.194055560E09 +++$+++ '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Bluegoblin7|<font color="blue">Bluegoblin</font>]][[User_talk:Bluegoblin7|<font color="gray">7</font>]]</font>''' 19:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
535673 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535672 +++$+++ 535672 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.194063180E09 +++$+++ I am not really the best person to write about the tramcar. I rally have no idea about trams, I just happened to be Crich recently. Feel free to use my picture elsewhere as long as you comply with its Creative Commons ShareAlike licence terms. Regards,  +++$+++ :I am not really the best person to write about the tramcar. I rally have no idea about trams, I just happened to be Crich recently. Feel free to use my picture elsewhere as long as you comply with its Creative Commons ShareAlike licence terms. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 21:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

11385 +++$+++ IllaZilla +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11385 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-13 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.289707140E09 +++$+++ Could use some help with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:IllaZilla&diff=396106699&oldid=395695094 that thing you mentioned], as it [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=The_Boat_That_Rocked&curid=16596475&diff=396549865&oldid=396159140 continues to be an issue]. I started a discussion on the talk page, but the editor apparently isn't interested in discussing why this list of trivial details is necessary. -- +++$+++ Could use some help with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:IllaZilla&diff=396106699&oldid=395695094 that thing you mentioned], as it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Boat_That_Rocked&curid=16596475&diff=396549865&oldid=396159140 continues to be an issue]. I started a discussion on the talk page, but the editor apparently isn't interested in discussing why this list of trivial details is necessary. --[[User:IllaZilla|IllaZilla]] ([[User talk:IllaZilla|talk]]) 19:59, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
11386 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11385 +++$+++ 11385 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.289755560E09 +++$+++ {{done}} No problem.  +++$+++ :{{done}} No problem. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 09:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

11387 +++$+++ Michig +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-19 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.292792100E09 +++$+++ An anonymous editor has added details of Glen's death on December 17. It is also reported on a few discussion forums, but I can see no reliable source at present. Have you heard anything?-- +++$+++ An anonymous editor has added details of Glen's death on December 17. It is also reported on a few discussion forums, but I can see no reliable source at present. Have you heard anything?--[[User:Michig|Michig]] ([[User talk:Michig|talk]]) 12:55, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
11388 +++$+++ Michig +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11387 +++$+++ 11387 +++$+++ 2010-12-20 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.292853300E09 +++$+++ Sadly, it's now confirmed.[http:\/\/jamaica-gleaner.com\/gleaner\/20101220\/ent\/ent3.html]-- +++$+++ :Sadly, it's now confirmed.[http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20101220/ent/ent3.html]--[[User:Michig|Michig]] ([[User talk:Michig|talk]]) 05:55, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
11389 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11387 +++$+++ 11388 +++$+++ 2010-12-20 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.292859960E09 +++$+++ I'd only just gathered he was ill via Susan Cadogan. I'm regretting now that I didn't take the time to shoot a video interview with him. I did shoot what was very likely his last ever live appearance, at the Knitting Factory on May 1 2010. I'm very proud of [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=LpiUuaacJYQ this clip] I shot of him.  +++$+++ ::I'd only just gathered he was ill via Susan Cadogan. I'm regretting now that I didn't take the time to shoot a video interview with him. I did shoot what was very likely his last ever live appearance, at the Knitting Factory on May 1 2010. I'm very proud of [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpiUuaacJYQ this clip] I shot of him. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 07:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
11390 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11387 +++$+++ 11389 +++$+++ 2010-12-20 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.292867100E09 +++$+++ Oh and, I do see an inaccuracy in that Gleaner article - they say he played on 'Return of Django'. I've made a comment, let's see if they let it thru.  +++$+++ :::Oh and, I do see an inaccuracy in that Gleaner article - they say he played on 'Return of Django'. I've made a comment, let's see if they let it thru. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 09:45, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
11391 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11387 +++$+++ 11390 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.292933520E09 +++$+++ After my comment was posted on the Gleaner article I've been contacted by Glen's biographer Elizabeth Barraclough to say that the information is incorrect, i.e. Adams did play on the records of both Return of Django and Live Injection. I'm going to leave a comment on [[Talk:The Upsetters]] to that effect. If the info is in dispute, and its only sourced to discogs.com it should be modified or removed.  +++$+++ :::: After my comment was posted on the Gleaner article I've been contacted by Glen's biographer Elizabeth Barraclough to say that the information is incorrect, i.e. Adams did play on the records of both Return of Django and Live Injection. I'm going to leave a comment on [[Talk:The Upsetters]] to that effect. If the info is in dispute, and its only sourced to discogs.com it should be modified or removed. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 04:12, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

11392 +++$+++ Ronhjones +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11392 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-27 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.306550160E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Wwwhatsup}} your upload log]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:image use policy|image use policy]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> ''' +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Wwwhatsup}} your upload log]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:image use policy|image use policy]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> '''[[User:Ronhjones|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:black; padding:1px;background:yellow"><font color="green">&nbsp;Ron<font color="red">h</font>jones&nbsp;</font></span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Ronhjones|&nbsp;(Talk)]]</sup> 19:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
11393 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11392 +++$+++ 11392 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.306667220E09 +++$+++ I will have to dig through old archives, but I'll try and dig up the authorizing email, which I note is dated 11-07-2007.  +++$+++ : I will have to dig through old archives, but I'll try and dig up the authorizing email, which I note is dated 11-07-2007. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 04:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

11395 +++$+++ Ronhjones +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-01 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.309580820E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Wwwhatsup}} your upload log]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:image use policy|image use policy]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> ''' +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Wwwhatsup}} your upload log]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:image use policy|image use policy]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> '''[[User:Ronhjones|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:black; padding:1px;background:yellow"><font color="green">&nbsp;Ron<font color="red">h</font>jones&nbsp;</font></span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Ronhjones|&nbsp;(Talk)]]</sup> 21:27, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
11396 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11395 +++$+++ 11395 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.309581540E09 +++$+++ HA! I thought we'd covered them all [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Wwwhatsup\/Archive_4#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_File:1177-01-03misspam02.jpg last time]. I'll get on it.  +++$+++ : HA! I thought we'd covered them all [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wwwhatsup/Archive_4#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_File:1177-01-03misspam02.jpg last time]. I'll get on it. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 21:39, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

11397 +++$+++ DusanEsence +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-18 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.311013020E09 +++$+++ Best regards from Prague  -- +++$+++ Best regards from Prague  --[[User:DusanEsence|DusanEsence]] ([[User talk:DusanEsence|talk]]) 11:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
11398 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11397 +++$+++ 11397 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.311088020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reminder. I have not forgotten, just been putting it off as it's a bit of work. I'll get to it soon.  +++$+++ : Thanks for the reminder. I have not forgotten, just been putting it off as it's a bit of work. I'll get to it soon. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 08:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
11399 +++$+++ Beyond My Ken +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11397 +++$+++ 11398 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.312025700E09 +++$+++ You are incorrect.  It is the same venue, I have reverted your edits.  Do not do this again without discussing it on the article talk page, as the reliable sources in the Irving Plaza article indicate that you are wrong.  +++$+++ ::You are incorrect.  It is the same venue, I have reverted your edits.  Do not do this again without discussing it on the article talk page, as the reliable sources in the Irving Plaza article indicate that you are wrong. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 04:35, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
11400 +++$+++ Beyond My Ken +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11397 +++$+++ 11399 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.312026120E09 +++$+++ Please do not make that move again unless you have a reliable source that shows that there were two different venues.  So far, there is not one, just someone's memory, which is not sufficient.  +++$+++ :::Please do not make that move again unless you have a reliable source that shows that there were two different venues.  So far, there is not one, just someone's memory, which is not sufficient. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 04:42, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
11401 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11397 +++$+++ 11398 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.312026180E09 +++$+++ This was established via the talk page months ago. Where have you been?  Please find refs to back up your assertion before reverting or redirecting. Just look at the pictures.  +++$+++ :: This was established via the talk page months ago. Where have you been?  Please find refs to back up your assertion before reverting or redirecting. Just look at the pictures. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 04:43, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
11402 +++$+++ Beyond My Ken +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11397 +++$+++ 11401 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.312026720E09 +++$+++ Only one of the photos actually \"established\" that, so you'll have to forgive me for only seeing it at the last moment.  I've undone my reverts, and restored the pages to the conditions I've found them in.  One thing you've neglected to do is post a \"copied\" template to indicate that material was copied from one article to another.  I'll do that now.  +++$+++ ::: Only one of the photos actually "established" that, so you'll have to forgive me for only seeing it at the last moment.  I've undone my reverts, and restored the pages to the conditions I've found them in.  One thing you've neglected to do is post a "copied" template to indicate that material was copied from one article to another.  I'll do that now. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 04:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
11403 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11397 +++$+++ 11402 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312026960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I spent a whole week finding all those refs earlier and was as surprised as you to find the mistake. But it makes sense. There's still some unraveling to do, and also investigation as to the real origins of Irving Plaza. I may do some interviews.  +++$+++ :::: Thanks. I spent a whole week finding all those refs earlier and was as surprised as you to find the mistake. But it makes sense. There's still some unraveling to do, and also investigation as to the real origins of Irving Plaza. I may do some interviews. [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 04:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
11404 +++$+++ Beyond My Ken +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11397 +++$+++ 11403 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.312027620E09 +++$+++ Sorry to go off half-cocked like that.  I thought that either someone was pulling a fast one, or that a big mistake was being made (since in my various investigations of the area I had never suspected there was a second venue), and I clearly over-reacted.  My apologies. I believe everything's back to where you left it, with the addition of the \"copied\" template and a project banner on the discussion page of the new article.  I look forward to looking through your list of sources this weekend and seeing what they have to offer.  Best,  +++$+++ ::::: Sorry to go off half-cocked like that.  I thought that either someone was pulling a fast one, or that a big mistake was being made (since in my various investigations of the area I had never suspected there was a second venue), and I clearly over-reacted.  My apologies. I believe everything's back to where you left it, with the addition of the "copied" template and a project banner on the discussion page of the new article.  I look forward to looking through your list of sources this weekend and seeing what they have to offer.  Best, [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 05:07, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
11405 +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11397 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.312027920E09 +++$+++ Yeah I didn't have a Times paid account when I did all that so, although I could dig them up I couldn't actually read a lot of them. Now, after they erected the paywall, they comped me an account, so I can :)  +++$+++ :::::::Yeah I didn't have a Times paid account when I did all that so, although I could dig them up I couldn't actually read a lot of them. Now, after they erected the paywall, they comped me an account, so I can :) [[User:Wwwhatsup|Wwwhatsup]] ([[User talk:Wwwhatsup#top|talk]]) 05:12, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
11406 +++$+++ Beyond My Ken +++$+++ Wwwhatsup +++$+++ 11397 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.312028040E09 +++$+++ Very good, so you'll probably be able to ferret out some new information to add to your new article.  Excellent.  +++$+++ ::::::::Very good, so you'll probably be able to ferret out some new information to add to your new article.  Excellent. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 05:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

535686 +++$+++ The Dragon of Bosnia +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-04 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.196798400E09 +++$+++ There are already articles called 7th Muslim Brigade, and The role of foreign volunteers. This is just redundant [[WP:OR]] article, based on unrelaible sources per [[WP:RS]]. On the other hand my sources are International court findings. The sources should be relaible, such as verdicts, verified documents, not blog, websites or unverified pictures\/photo montague. You also tried to delete the cause of foreign volunteers arrival, and the cause were mass war crimes committed by Serb forces. This is the [[ICTY]] conclusion. So when you talk about NPOV, I just can't understand your earlier actions.  +++$+++ There are already articles called 7th Muslim Brigade, and The role of foreign volunteers. This is just redundant [[WP:OR]] article, based on unrelaible sources per [[WP:RS]]. On the other hand my sources are International court findings. The sources should be relaible, such as verdicts, verified documents, not blog, websites or unverified pictures/photo montague. You also tried to delete the cause of foreign volunteers arrival, and the cause were mass war crimes committed by Serb forces. This is the [[ICTY]] conclusion. So when you talk about NPOV, I just can't understand your earlier actions. [[User:The Dragon of Bosnia|The Dragon of Bosnia]] 12:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
535687 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535686 +++$+++ 535686 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.196838840E09 +++$+++ Osli\/Dragon, it is not really up to admins to rule on content disputes. Hence, do not take my words as some kind of \"official advice\". I am not very familiar with the articles you are mentioning. However, I took the effort of checking for news in [[Lexis-Nexis]] and articles on [http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/about\/desc.html JSTOR] containing the sentence  \"Bosnian Mujahideen\" and found only a few results, mostly meaning \"Mujahideen in Bosnia\". To that effect, I maybe could see the point of creating a separate article under that name (i.e. [[Mujahideen in Bosnia]]), which would contain generic details on the subject and would link to more specific articles: 7th Brigade, 17th Brigade, etc. In any case, this is just an idea and I would encourage you both to try to get [[WP:RfC|a second opinion]]? Regards,  +++$+++ :Osli/Dragon, it is not really up to admins to rule on content disputes. Hence, do not take my words as some kind of "official advice". I am not very familiar with the articles you are mentioning. However, I took the effort of checking for news in [[Lexis-Nexis]] and articles on [http://www.jstor.org/about/desc.html JSTOR] containing the sentence  "Bosnian Mujahideen" and found only a few results, mostly meaning "Mujahideen in Bosnia". To that effect, I maybe could see the point of creating a separate article under that name (i.e. [[Mujahideen in Bosnia]]), which would contain generic details on the subject and would link to more specific articles: 7th Brigade, 17th Brigade, etc. In any case, this is just an idea and I would encourage you both to try to get [[WP:RfC|a second opinion]]? Regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 23:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
535688 +++$+++ Osli73 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535686 +++$+++ 535687 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.196844540E09 +++$+++ I agree that the term Bosnian Mujahideen is not very common, however, it is used by some reputable sources. Also, other version of the name are used (El Mujahid, El Mujahed, Bosnian Mujahedeen, Bosnian Mujahedin, etc.). I think the problem here is that Dragon has constructed a POV article which brushes over and exonerates the Bosnian Mujahideen rather than describing them and is now upset by this article. +++$+++ ::I agree that the term Bosnian Mujahideen is not very common, however, it is used by some reputable sources. Also, other version of the name are used (El Mujahid, El Mujahed, Bosnian Mujahedeen, Bosnian Mujahedin, etc.). I think the problem here is that Dragon has constructed a POV article which brushes over and exonerates the Bosnian Mujahideen rather than describing them and is now upset by this article.[[User:Osli73|Osli73]] ([[User talk:Osli73|talk]]) 00:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

273543 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273543 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-15 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.171599840E09 +++$+++ Again, my reporting of her to RFC was not done out of hatred to black people or women. Please believe me when I say that I ''do not'' hate women or blacks.  +++$+++ Again, my reporting of her to RFC was not done out of hatred to black people or women. Please believe me when I say that I ''do not'' hate women or blacks. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
273544 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273543 +++$+++ 273543 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.171672320E09 +++$+++ You don't have to do anything, as there's nothing you can do. I just wanted to bring it to your attention, as you were involved in that case.  +++$+++ *You don't have to do anything, as there's nothing you can do. I just wanted to bring it to your attention, as you were involved in that case. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

273546 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273546 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.171646760E09 +++$+++ That was a werid one - I thought there'd be genuine news stories if someone was to post something like that - unless family have put an embargo in some way - really odd.  She is in a nursing hme. +++$+++ That was a werid one - I thought there'd be genuine news stories if someone was to post something like that - unless family have put an embargo in some way - really odd.  She is in a nursing hme.[[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 09:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
273547 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273546 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.171647300E09 +++$+++ ABC - no sign - I'd have thought they'd picked it up - but there might either be a lawyer\/family member whose not revealing till after burial\/cremation - but why\/how the poster knows is another matter - probably leave off till it goes public, if its true. gees i dont envy your current stable of trouble makers!  +++$+++ ::ABC - no sign - I'd have thought they'd picked it up - but there might either be a lawyer/family member whose not revealing till after burial/cremation - but why/how the poster knows is another matter - probably leave off till it goes public, if its true. gees i dont envy your current stable of trouble makers! [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 09:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
273548 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273546 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.171963500E09 +++$+++ My intiution was correct- it came out today... cripes - and the family had put an embargo - which means the early poster might have been a nursing home insider... oh well, ..we all gotta go sometime  +++$+++ ::My intiution was correct- it came out today... cripes - and the family had put an embargo - which means the early poster might have been a nursing home insider... oh well, ..we all gotta go sometime [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 01:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

438807 +++$+++ Mirror Vax +++$+++ Wernher +++$+++ 438807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-04-16 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.113664620E09 +++$+++ I noticed you put \"merge\" notices on the [[68008]]\/[[68012]] entries. The fact that these articles are small is not a valid reason to merge. Small is good! I hope you will revert the merge requests.  +++$+++ I noticed you put "merge" notices on the [[68008]]/[[68012]] entries. The fact that these articles are small is not a valid reason to merge. Small is good! I hope you will revert the merge requests. [[User:Mirror Vax|Mirror Vax]] 08:17, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
438808 +++$+++ Wernher +++$+++ Wernher +++$+++ 438807 +++$+++ 438807 +++$+++ 2005-04-17 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.113747180E09 +++$+++ Hmm. I will accept this for the 68008, but I still think the 68012 article should be merged with the 68010 one---due to the very small differences between those two processors. -- +++$+++ :Hmm. I will accept this for the 68008, but I still think the 68012 article should be merged with the 68010 one---due to the very small differences between those two processors. --[[User:Wernher|Wernher]] 07:13, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
438809 +++$+++ Mirror Vax +++$+++ Wernher +++$+++ 438807 +++$+++ 438808 +++$+++ 2005-04-17 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.113768240E09 +++$+++ The pin-out is different, so if somebody adds pin-outs in the future it would be good to have it seperate.  +++$+++ ::The pin-out is different, so if somebody adds pin-outs in the future it would be good to have it seperate. [[User:Mirror Vax|Mirror Vax]] 13:04, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

11408 +++$+++ Kebeta +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-06 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.307420700E09 +++$+++ I still don't get what exactlly was that you did on [[List of campaigns of Suleiman the Magnificent]] regarding the \"Sorting function\", but I thank you very much. When I made that table's columns in the first place, I was looking in one existing FL for help. Obviously I have made some errors in the process. Anyway, I really appreciate your help! Regards,  +++$+++ I still don't get what exactlly was that you did on [[List of campaigns of Suleiman the Magnificent]] regarding the "Sorting function", but I thank you very much. When I made that table's columns in the first place, I was looking in one existing FL for help. Obviously I have made some errors in the process. Anyway, I really appreciate your help! Regards, [[User:Kebeta|Kebeta]] ([[User talk:Kebeta|talk]]) 21:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
11409 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11408 +++$+++ 11408 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.307421060E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. For future reference, you can check the [[Help:Table#Sorting|table help]] page to learn more about sorting. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :You're welcome. For future reference, you can check the [[Help:Table#Sorting|table help]] page to learn more about sorting. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 21:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
11410 +++$+++ Kebeta +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11408 +++$+++ 11409 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.307423760E09 +++$+++ Thanks Arsonal, I have learned a lot here, but still learning :) -- +++$+++ ::Thanks Arsonal, I have learned a lot here, but still learning :) --[[User:Kebeta|Kebeta]] ([[User talk:Kebeta|talk]]) 22:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

569880 +++$+++ Necris +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569880 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-12 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.178991660E09 +++$+++ hey, i'm just notifying you because you were the first admin aphabetically check out [[:User talk:208.70.75.219]] and you'll know what its about  +++$+++ hey, i'm just notifying you because you were the first admin aphabetically check out [[:User talk:208.70.75.219]] and you'll know what its about [[User:Necris|DarkMessiah AKA Necris]] 10:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
569881 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569880 +++$+++ 569880 +++$+++ 2007-05-12 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.178992800E09 +++$+++ This IP editor isn't blocked - perhaps they are suffering because of collateral damage caused by a now-blocked account? Regards,  +++$+++ :This IP editor isn't blocked - perhaps they are suffering because of collateral damage caused by a now-blocked account? Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 11:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

535698 +++$+++ Gibmetal77 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535698 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-11 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.205285280E09 +++$+++ Hi Asterion. I replied to your comment on [[User_talk:Gibmetal77#Canal_Sur|my talk page]] 2 months ago and never heard back from you. I was just wondering if you still want to go ahead with your proposal to use a footnote for the availability of [[Canal Sur]]? Saludos. -- +++$+++ Hi Asterion. I replied to your comment on [[User_talk:Gibmetal77#Canal_Sur|my talk page]] 2 months ago and never heard back from you. I was just wondering if you still want to go ahead with your proposal to use a footnote for the availability of [[Canal Sur]]? Saludos. --[[User:Gibmetal77|<span style="margin:0;text-align:left;color:#FF7F00;font-size:80%;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold;padding:0.2em 0.4em">Gibmetal 77</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Gibmetal77|<font color="#99 32 CC">talk</font>]]</sup> 18:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
535699 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535698 +++$+++ 535698 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.205312880E09 +++$+++ Sorry Gibmetal77 (any relation to Breed 7 7 ? I love their Zombie cover). I have been off wikipedia since before xmas. I'll get back to you asap. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Sorry Gibmetal77 (any relation to Breed 7 7 ? I love their Zombie cover). I have been off wikipedia since before xmas. I'll get back to you asap. Cheers, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 02:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
535700 +++$+++ Gibmetal77 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535698 +++$+++ 535699 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.205335320E09 +++$+++ Yes I've taken it from [[Breed 77]] (my favourite band), it's nice to see you like them too :o). No problem, I just thought I'd drop you a line... -- +++$+++ ::Yes I've taken it from [[Breed 77]] (my favourite band), it's nice to see you like them too :o). No problem, I just thought I'd drop you a line... --[[User:Gibmetal77|<span style="margin:0;text-align:left;color:#FF7F00;font-size:80%;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold;padding:0.2em 0.4em">Gibmetal 77</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Gibmetal77|<font color="#99 32 CC">talk</font>]]</sup> 08:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

11411 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-08 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.307568840E09 +++$+++ Are you any good at maps \/ graphic design? I have a map from ''Tempo'' that could be recreated from free images, but I don't have the knowledge of Jakarta necessary to do it.  +++$+++ Are you any good at maps / graphic design? I have a map from ''Tempo'' that could be recreated from free images, but I don't have the knowledge of Jakarta necessary to do it. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 14:34, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
11412 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11411 +++$+++ 11411 +++$+++ 2011-06-08 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.307569080E09 +++$+++ I was thinking of using [[:File:Location map Jakarta.png]] as the base image with [[:File:Red Point.gif]] (with a hue change) to indicate the locations of different riots. The original map could be sent via email, maybe.  +++$+++ :I was thinking of using [[:File:Location map Jakarta.png]] as the base image with [[:File:Red Point.gif]] (with a hue change) to indicate the locations of different riots. The original map could be sent via email, maybe. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 14:38, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
11413 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11411 +++$+++ 11412 +++$+++ 2011-06-08 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.307585880E09 +++$+++ I'll see what I can do. You can send me <s>a scan of the page<\/s> your address via e-mail using the Wikipedia server. Information about the ''Tempo'' issue would be appreciated as well (volume, issue, date, article, author etc.) \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ ::I'll see what I can do. You can send me <s>a scan of the page</s> your address via e-mail using the Wikipedia server. Information about the ''Tempo'' issue would be appreciated as well (volume, issue, date, article, author etc.) —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 19:18, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

535701 +++$+++ Getoar +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-23 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.208953560E09 +++$+++ Greetings! I would like you to reconsider the changes in the article [[University of Prishtina]]. The page is now a redirect to a disputed and biased article, which does not offer a true representation of the university as the version you removed. It is offensive for an education establishment of over 30,000 students.-- +++$+++ Greetings! I would like you to reconsider the changes in the article [[University of Prishtina]]. The page is now a redirect to a disputed and biased article, which does not offer a true representation of the university as the version you removed. It is offensive for an education establishment of over 30,000 students.--[[User:Getoar|Getoar]] ([[User talk:Getoar|talk]]) 05:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
535702 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535701 +++$+++ 535701 +++$+++ 2008-04-23 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.208953680E09 +++$+++ I understand your reasoning but the way to solve a content dispute is not by creating a content fork page. Regards,  +++$+++ :I understand your reasoning but the way to solve a content dispute is not by creating a content fork page. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 05:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

11414 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11414 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-08 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.307600220E09 +++$+++ You've also got mail.    +++$+++ You've also got mail.   [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 23:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
11415 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11414 +++$+++ 11414 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.307624280E09 +++$+++ Are you currently editing [[Indonesian riots of May 1998]]? I want to add some information, but I don't want to cause any edit conflicts for you.  +++$+++ :Are you currently editing [[Indonesian riots of May 1998]]? I want to add some information, but I don't want to cause any edit conflicts for you. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 05:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
11416 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11414 +++$+++ 11415 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.307624460E09 +++$+++ Just focusing on the international reaction section at the moment. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ ::Just focusing on the international reaction section at the moment. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 06:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
11417 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11414 +++$+++ 11416 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.307624700E09 +++$+++ K. I will try and add some more about the riots in different cities.  +++$+++ :::K. I will try and add some more about the riots in different cities. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 06:05, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

482500 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482500 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-12 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.171330800E09 +++$+++ We've got a seemingly-paranoid IP address making a generic accusation of \"sockpuppetry\" and \"collusion\" regarding the editing of film articles, of all things. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Blazing_Saddles&curid=3837&action=history] If he resumes pushing his viewpoint on this, I'm not sure what to do.  +++$+++ We've got a seemingly-paranoid IP address making a generic accusation of "sockpuppetry" and "collusion" regarding the editing of film articles, of all things. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blazing_Saddles&curid=3837&action=history] If he resumes pushing his viewpoint on this, I'm not sure what to do. [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 17:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
482501 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482500 +++$+++ 482500 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.171338120E09 +++$+++ Wow, what in the world is that all about? S\/he is making a federal case about the use of film-related trivia? I predict a new entry at [[WP:LAME]] soon. One suggestion I'll make is to make sure all of those facts are sourced well. It's more difficult to insist on the inclusion of unsourced facts. Other than that, we may have to sprotect the article since it's a floating IP. \u2014 +++$+++ :Wow, what in the world is that all about? S/he is making a federal case about the use of film-related trivia? I predict a new entry at [[WP:LAME]] soon. One suggestion I'll make is to make sure all of those facts are sourced well. It's more difficult to insist on the inclusion of unsourced facts. Other than that, we may have to sprotect the article since it's a floating IP. —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 19:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
482502 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482500 +++$+++ 482501 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.171361940E09 +++$+++ Things seem to be a little calmer this evening. We'll see. One thing, in my observations over the last couple of years on this site, vandals don't tend to stick around very long, as they get bored. But there are always new ones cropping up. Kind of like Bill Cosby's story about the lumps in the cream-of-wheat.  +++$+++ ::Things seem to be a little calmer this evening. We'll see. One thing, in my observations over the last couple of years on this site, vandals don't tend to stick around very long, as they get bored. But there are always new ones cropping up. Kind of like Bill Cosby's story about the lumps in the cream-of-wheat. [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 02:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

11419 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11419 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-09 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.307686980E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I hereby grant thee, Arsonal, the Indonesia barnstar for they great contributions to [[May 1998 riots of Indonesia]] and [[Chinese-Indonesian]] as well as for being a great collaborator. The Wiki is much richer thanks to thy additions!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I hereby grant thee, Arsonal, the Indonesia barnstar for they great contributions to [[May 1998 riots of Indonesia]] and [[Chinese-Indonesian]] as well as for being a great collaborator. The Wiki is much richer thanks to thy additions! [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 23:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
11420 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11419 +++$+++ 11419 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.307699160E09 +++$+++ Many thanks! \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :Many thanks! —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 02:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

273564 +++$+++ Orangemonster2k1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-17 07:19:00 +++$+++ 1.171725540E09 +++$+++ Calton's bullying (among other things) has landed him a RfC.  If you would like to comment, you can by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/Calton clicking here].  If you wish to stay out of the RfC thing, that is cool and I will respect your decision.  I am just letting people know of the RfC that might not know it exsists.  Have a good weekend.... +++$+++ Calton's bullying (among other things) has landed him a RfC.  If you would like to comment, you can by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Calton clicking here].  If you wish to stay out of the RfC thing, that is cool and I will respect your decision.  I am just letting people know of the RfC that might not know it exsists.  Have a good weekend....[[User:Orangemonster2k1|SVRTVDude]] <sup>([[User_talk:Orangemonster2k1|Yell]] - [[Special:Contributions/Orangemonster2k1|Toil]])</sup> 07:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
273565 +++$+++ Orangemonster2k1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273564 +++$+++ 273564 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.171726560E09 +++$+++ You're Welcome:) -  +++$+++ :You're Welcome:) - [[User:Orangemonster2k1|SVRTVDude]] <sup>([[User_talk:Orangemonster2k1|Yell]] - [[Special:Contributions/Orangemonster2k1|Toil]])</sup> 07:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
273566 +++$+++ Orangemonster2k1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273564 +++$+++ 273565 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.171755660E09 +++$+++ If he wouldn't badmouth me all over Wiki, I would GLADLY take him of my watchlist, but I am not about to have my name dragged through the dirt by him.  I do hope though, that you don't incure the rath of Calton by responding on his RfC....if you do, then I deeply apologize. -  +++$+++ ::If he wouldn't badmouth me all over Wiki, I would GLADLY take him of my watchlist, but I am not about to have my name dragged through the dirt by him.  I do hope though, that you don't incure the rath of Calton by responding on his RfC....if you do, then I deeply apologize. - [[User:Orangemonster2k1|SVRTVDude]] <sup>([[User_talk:Orangemonster2k1|Yell]] - [[Special:Contributions/Orangemonster2k1|Toil]])</sup> 15:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
273567 +++$+++ Calton +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273564 +++$+++ 273566 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.171790460E09 +++$+++ Other than that, nope, not Wikistalking me in the least. -- +++$+++ :::Other than that, nope, not Wikistalking me in the least. --[[User:Calton|Calton]] | [[User talk:Calton|Talk]] 01:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
273568 +++$+++ Orangemonster2k1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273564 +++$+++ 273565 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.171811400E09 +++$+++ To Sarah, I greatly apologize to you that this continued arguement between Calton and I has spilt onto your talk page and I will leave your talk page now.  Again, my apologizes.  Calton, I think it would be fair to [[User:Sarah Ewart]] if you did the same and if you wish to continue this, we can take it to your talk page or mine (if you want to talk, not argue, and want to actually read what I have to say and not delete everything). -  +++$+++ ::To Sarah, I greatly apologize to you that this continued arguement between Calton and I has spilt onto your talk page and I will leave your talk page now.  Again, my apologizes.  Calton, I think it would be fair to [[User:Sarah Ewart]] if you did the same and if you wish to continue this, we can take it to your talk page or mine (if you want to talk, not argue, and want to actually read what I have to say and not delete everything). - [[User:Orangemonster2k1|SVRTVDude]] <sup>([[User_talk:Orangemonster2k1|Yell]] - [[Special:Contributions/Orangemonster2k1|Toil]])</sup> 07:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

11421 +++$+++ Redyka94 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-10 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.307718000E09 +++$+++ Terima kasih sudah memberitahu cara mencantumkan sumber. Tetapi saya kurang tahu apakah thesis yang saya gunakan sudah ditinjau dosen atau belum. Bisakah Anda memeriksanya di [http:\/\/digitool.library.mcgill.ca\/R\/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=20150&local_base=GEN01-MCG02 sini]?  +++$+++ Terima kasih sudah memberitahu cara mencantumkan sumber. Tetapi saya kurang tahu apakah thesis yang saya gunakan sudah ditinjau dosen atau belum. Bisakah Anda memeriksanya di [http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=20150&local_base=GEN01-MCG02 sini]? [[User:Redyka94|<font color="green">'''αδζ'''</font>]] [[User talk:Redyka94|<font color="black">'''ψακ'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Redyka94|<font color="#FFD700">'''φρψερ'''</font>]] 08:00, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
11422 +++$+++ Redyka94 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11421 +++$+++ 11421 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.307719020E09 +++$+++ Oh, begitu caranya. Jadi udah bisa pake {{tl|cite book}} ya?  +++$+++ :Oh, begitu caranya. Jadi udah bisa pake {{tl|cite book}} ya? [[User:Redyka94|<font color="green">'''αδζ'''</font>]] [[User talk:Redyka94|<font color="black">'''ψακ'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Redyka94|<font color="#FFD700">'''φρψερ'''</font>]] 08:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
11423 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11421 +++$+++ 11421 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.307719200E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for helping Redyka, Arsonal. (And me too, I hadn't even thought about that; now I have a source for the ''Jakarta 2039'' blurb from Gadjah Mada University)  +++$+++ :Thanks a lot for helping Redyka, Arsonal. (And me too, I hadn't even thought about that; now I have a source for the ''Jakarta 2039'' blurb from Gadjah Mada University) [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 08:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

613573 +++$+++ Cosans +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-11 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.236772200E09 +++$+++ Hi Dave....Thank you again for showing me how to use the different features and explaining how editing works.  At this point I have posted two items under Owen.  One is a general suggestion\/invitation to people to look at the key scholarship on him and make revisions in light of that.  I give a list of the major books and articles in English.  The other one is a list of additions and revisions I made, along with an explanation of the rational of each one.  Most of what I put in was pretty basic stuff that anyone who is doing research on Owen would agree on...although some of the items do break with the urban legends about Owen.  I have also put a little note on the question of subclass to add to your and Ross' points.  I do wonder if we can really judge past scientists the way Ross seems to want to.  Its not like God had an answer sheet of how to classify things, and Owen went against it when he bumped humans up from an order to a subclass.  Foucault has a really interesting discussion of classification in the Order of Things.  Finally I did add a talk post on Huxley in which I put some of the current text, a suggested revision, and a discussion of what I think the issues are in the revision.  Some of the claims made in the Huxley article are oversimplifications at best, and they are not consistent with a reading of what Owen published in 1851, 1857 and 1859.  It is not consistent with Chris Smith's 1997 article or Nick Rupke's 1994 book as well.  Anyhow, I would like you to know that I would not intentionally put anything on without logging on, so please delete if you can any of the other things that have been posted on Huxley that you want or Ross or others want to delete.  If there are any ideas you want to discuss from it let me know.  I do want to note that I don't think Ross has been all that welcoming, and it seems to me if all professors and researchers contributed to your site after they published articles or books with university presses it would improve the quality of the site as well as help advance everyone's understanding.  We have strict things we have to go through to have our work published, and once it is published we know what some of the key points are.  The guidelines say we are suppose to cite ourselves but not excessively, and that seems reasonable to me.  If we were to dump a lot of stuff on your site that was not refereed and published first then we would be going outside of that process.  Thanks again for all your help and I look forward to reading more of your thoughts.  Chris   +++$+++ Hi Dave....Thank you again for showing me how to use the different features and explaining how editing works.  At this point I have posted two items under Owen.  One is a general suggestion/invitation to people to look at the key scholarship on him and make revisions in light of that.  I give a list of the major books and articles in English.  The other one is a list of additions and revisions I made, along with an explanation of the rational of each one.  Most of what I put in was pretty basic stuff that anyone who is doing research on Owen would agree on...although some of the items do break with the urban legends about Owen.  I have also put a little note on the question of subclass to add to your and Ross' points.  I do wonder if we can really judge past scientists the way Ross seems to want to.  Its not like God had an answer sheet of how to classify things, and Owen went against it when he bumped humans up from an order to a subclass.  Foucault has a really interesting discussion of classification in the Order of Things.  Finally I did add a talk post on Huxley in which I put some of the current text, a suggested revision, and a discussion of what I think the issues are in the revision.  Some of the claims made in the Huxley article are oversimplifications at best, and they are not consistent with a reading of what Owen published in 1851, 1857 and 1859.  It is not consistent with Chris Smith's 1997 article or Nick Rupke's 1994 book as well.  Anyhow, I would like you to know that I would not intentionally put anything on without logging on, so please delete if you can any of the other things that have been posted on Huxley that you want or Ross or others want to delete.  If there are any ideas you want to discuss from it let me know.  I do want to note that I don't think Ross has been all that welcoming, and it seems to me if all professors and researchers contributed to your site after they published articles or books with university presses it would improve the quality of the site as well as help advance everyone's understanding.  We have strict things we have to go through to have our work published, and once it is published we know what some of the key points are.  The guidelines say we are suppose to cite ourselves but not excessively, and that seems reasonable to me.  If we were to dump a lot of stuff on your site that was not refereed and published first then we would be going outside of that process.  Thanks again for all your help and I look forward to reading more of your thoughts.  Chris  [[User:Cosans|Cosans]] ([[User talk:Cosans|talk]]) 04:50, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
613574 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613573 +++$+++ 613573 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.236790260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for getting the ball rolling on the article talk pages, we do have to work within the constraints of article size and [[WP:WEIGHT]] so points will have to be concisely summarised, or perhaps expanded into new sub articles. While {{User|Macdonald-ross}} was a bit suspicious of what was going on, that's understandable in light of past events in this big open community of all sorts of viewpoints. Sometimes people do try to amend articles to promote their viewpoint and their books \u2013 on this same general historical topic, promotion of '' The Homeopathic Revolution by'' [[Dana Ullman]] [http:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/blog\/2007\/08\/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html][http:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/blog\/2007\/12\/homeopathic-revolution-by-dana-ullman.html]  involved a lot of argument to overcome his claims that Charles Darwin was cured by homeopathy, improving the articles but not everyone's temper! (links for my own convenience) Expert contributions are very welcome, subject to [[WP:NOR|no original research]] and appreciation that non-experts can also contribute. Including me! . .  +++$+++ :Thanks for getting the ball rolling on the article talk pages, we do have to work within the constraints of article size and [[WP:WEIGHT]] so points will have to be concisely summarised, or perhaps expanded into new sub articles. While {{User|Macdonald-ross}} was a bit suspicious of what was going on, that's understandable in light of past events in this big open community of all sorts of viewpoints. Sometimes people do try to amend articles to promote their viewpoint and their books – on this same general historical topic, promotion of '' The Homeopathic Revolution by'' [[Dana Ullman]] [http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html][http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/12/homeopathic-revolution-by-dana-ullman.html]  involved a lot of argument to overcome his claims that Charles Darwin was cured by homeopathy, improving the articles but not everyone's temper! (links for my own convenience) Expert contributions are very welcome, subject to [[WP:NOR|no original research]] and appreciation that non-experts can also contribute. Including me! . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

11424 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11424 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-10 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.307738400E09 +++$+++ Do you think [http:\/\/id.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Berkas:Agus_salim3.jpg this] is public domain in Indonesia? It says it is published on a .go.id domain.  +++$+++ Do you think [http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkas:Agus_salim3.jpg this] is public domain in Indonesia? It says it is published on a .go.id domain. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 13:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
11425 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11424 +++$+++ 11424 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.307756460E09 +++$+++ Without seeing the metadata page for that file, I can't be sure. The Presidential Documents website is more a clipping of different photographs, some government produced, some from books and news articles. Depending on the attribution, it may or may not be copyrighted. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :Without seeing the metadata page for that file, I can't be sure. The Presidential Documents website is more a clipping of different photographs, some government produced, some from books and news articles. Depending on the attribution, it may or may not be copyrighted. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 18:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
11426 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11424 +++$+++ 11424 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.307756700E09 +++$+++ Additionally, the file you uploaded of Agus Salim does not fall under {{tl|PD-IDGov}} because the copyright is explicitly written on the website (see provision number 2 in that article). It should, however, fall under {{tl|PD-ID}} because Agus Salim died in 1954, so his photographs are more than 50 years old. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :Additionally, the file you uploaded of Agus Salim does not fall under {{tl|PD-IDGov}} because the copyright is explicitly written on the website (see provision number 2 in that article). It should, however, fall under {{tl|PD-ID}} because Agus Salim died in 1954, so his photographs are more than 50 years old. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 18:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
11427 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11424 +++$+++ 11426 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.307791920E09 +++$+++ I was just about to ask you that. My interpretation of Article 14 is that the copyright has to be stated on the work and not where it is hosted (i.e. the website design is copyrighted but the picture is not); however, [[Template:PD-ID]] is more definite (and more definitely correct), so I'll change that.  +++$+++ ::I was just about to ask you that. My interpretation of Article 14 is that the copyright has to be stated on the work and not where it is hosted (i.e. the website design is copyrighted but the picture is not); however, [[Template:PD-ID]] is more definite (and more definitely correct), so I'll change that. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 04:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
11428 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11424 +++$+++ 11427 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.307794320E09 +++$+++ The notice applies to the entire website. I've had my run-ins with the Commons copyright police. ;) If you ever scan government-attributed photos from books in the future, check to make sure there's no copyright notice in the parent work as well. If there isn't, I usually note my uploads as \"government publication without copyright notice\". \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::The notice applies to the entire website. I've had my run-ins with the Commons copyright police. ;) If you ever scan government-attributed photos from books in the future, check to make sure there's no copyright notice in the parent work as well. If there isn't, I usually note my uploads as "government publication without copyright notice". —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 05:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
11429 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11424 +++$+++ 11428 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 05:16:00 +++$+++ 1.307794560E09 +++$+++ I've had mine too, but I was mainly pointing out copyright violations <small>two pictures of Cinta Laura in two days... ugh<\/small> Is there a template for government publications without copyright notice?  +++$+++ ::::I've had mine too, but I was mainly pointing out copyright violations <small>two pictures of Cinta Laura in two days... ugh</small> Is there a template for government publications without copyright notice? [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 05:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
11430 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11424 +++$+++ 11429 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.307795100E09 +++$+++ Not that I know of. I just write it out in the Permissions field, such as in [[:File:Jakarta riot 14 May 1998.jpg]]. Unfortunately a lot of files uploaded under claims of Indonesian government public domain are faced with the burden of proof. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::::Not that I know of. I just write it out in the Permissions field, such as in [[:File:Jakarta riot 14 May 1998.jpg]]. Unfortunately a lot of files uploaded under claims of Indonesian government public domain are faced with the burden of proof. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 05:25, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
11431 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11424 +++$+++ 11430 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.307795460E09 +++$+++ Coupled with the use of {{[[Template:PD-IDGov|PD-IDGov]]}}. I see. Thanks!  +++$+++ ::::::Coupled with the use of {{[[Template:PD-IDGov|PD-IDGov]]}}. I see. Thanks! [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 05:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

535714 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-25 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.219707180E09 +++$+++ That is why I'd like to hear from someone reviewing it who has little idea about the thing in question, to get the most impartial view possible at this point. I am not asking for, say, \"executive action\" at this point, but I'd like to hear opinions from people who do not know (and, most important, do not really ''care'') about this topic. Is there any wikipedia corner that you know where I could ask for this? <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"><font color=\"#800080\"> +++$+++ That is why I'd like to hear from someone reviewing it who has little idea about the thing in question, to get the most impartial view possible at this point. I am not asking for, say, "executive action" at this point, but I'd like to hear opinions from people who do not know (and, most important, do not really ''care'') about this topic. Is there any wikipedia corner that you know where I could ask for this? <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#800080">[[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]]</font></span> [[User talk:Mountolive| <sub>please, behave</sub>]] 16:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
535715 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535714 +++$+++ 535714 +++$+++ 2008-08-25 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.219708860E09 +++$+++ Hi Mountolive. What is your reasoning behind deleting the template? Is it a just a controversial one or is it clearly in breach of some policy? I am not sure of the right wikilink but if you look for templates for deletion and have a look at the way these are dealt with, you may realise that there are usually other editors who get involved on most discussions. At the end of the day, these are not polls and it does not matter how many \"votes\" it gets. Hope it helps. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Mountolive. What is your reasoning behind deleting the template? Is it a just a controversial one or is it clearly in breach of some policy? I am not sure of the right wikilink but if you look for templates for deletion and have a look at the way these are dealt with, you may realise that there are usually other editors who get involved on most discussions. At the end of the day, these are not polls and it does not matter how many "votes" it gets. Hope it helps. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 17:01, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

535716 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535716 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-28 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.219968960E09 +++$+++ Asterion, what can I do in this regard? who could I talk to? Thanks a lot. <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"><font color=\"#800080\"> +++$+++ Asterion, what can I do in this regard? who could I talk to? Thanks a lot. <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#800080">[[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]]</font></span> [[User talk:Mountolive| <sub>spare me the suspense</sub>]] 17:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
535717 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535716 +++$+++ 535716 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.219982460E09 +++$+++ Again, I hate to bother you, but, since I am not really acquainted with wikipedia's manor corridors (nor, to be honest, I am really interested in those) I was just hoping you can direct me to somewhere\/someone who is able, willing and with the ability to address this kind of problems...<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"><font color=\"#800080\"> +++$+++ :Again, I hate to bother you, but, since I am not really acquainted with wikipedia's manor corridors (nor, to be honest, I am really interested in those) I was just hoping you can direct me to somewhere/someone who is able, willing and with the ability to address this kind of problems...<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#800080">[[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]]</font></span> [[User talk:Mountolive| <sub>spare me the suspense</sub>]] 21:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
535718 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535716 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.219984080E09 +++$+++ PPS: I noticed the Elche \/ Elx article too but this one really needs to be put forward for [[WP:RM]]. For a start the talk page is under a different name than the article. I cannot just pick one of the two names as the article was renamed to the dual language version in 2006 without no one opposing. So it is a matter of finding out which one is more commonly used in English language, I suppose. Regards,  +++$+++ :::PPS: I noticed the Elche / Elx article too but this one really needs to be put forward for [[WP:RM]]. For a start the talk page is under a different name than the article. I cannot just pick one of the two names as the article was renamed to the dual language version in 2006 without no one opposing. So it is a matter of finding out which one is more commonly used in English language, I suppose. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 21:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

535719 +++$+++ 90.14.105.62 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-30 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.220124000E09 +++$+++ So please dont change the figures as the ones specified now are absolutely correct.--[[Special:Contributions\/90.14.105.62|90.14.105.62]] ( +++$+++ So please dont change the figures as the ones specified now are absolutely correct.--[[Special:Contributions/90.14.105.62|90.14.105.62]] ([[User talk:90.14.105.62|talk]]) 12:20, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
535720 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ 535719 +++$+++ 535719 +++$+++ 2008-08-30 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.220127420E09 +++$+++ Apologies for the misunderstanding. The fact that you used a potentially misleading edit summary (ie \"typo\") to amend a paragraph that you had not edited in the first place looked certainly suspicious to me at the time. Regards,  +++$+++ :Apologies for the misunderstanding. The fact that you used a potentially misleading edit summary (ie "typo") to amend a paragraph that you had not edited in the first place looked certainly suspicious to me at the time. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 13:17, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

273576 +++$+++ Jance +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.171962120E09 +++$+++ I have filed an An\/I.  Ted's conduct is an invasion of privacy, and pure harassment.  There is no sane reason for him to continue this. +++$+++ I have filed an An/I.  Ted's conduct is an invasion of privacy, and pure harassment.  There is no sane reason for him to continue this.[[User:Jance|Jance]] 01:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
273577 +++$+++ TedFrank +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273576 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.171972260E09 +++$+++ Please note that I am restoring the following comment that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Sarah_Ewart&diff=prev&oldid=109439756 Jance deleted] to make it seem like I wasn't apologetic. --  +++$+++ ::Please note that I am restoring the following comment that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sarah_Ewart&diff=prev&oldid=109439756 Jance deleted] to make it seem like I wasn't apologetic. -- [[User:TedFrank|TedFrank]] 03:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

11433 +++$+++ Bill william compton +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11433 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-20 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.308567960E09 +++$+++ Hello Arsonal, I think I've resolved all your comments and made necessary changes in the article, so would you mind revisiting the nomination page, thanks and regards.  +++$+++ Hello Arsonal, I think I've resolved all your comments and made necessary changes in the article, so would you mind revisiting the nomination page, thanks and regards. [[User:Bill william compton|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><font color="#009900"><sup></sup> — Bill william compton</font></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Bill william compton|<font color="#000000">Talk</font>]]</sup>   04:06, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
11434 +++$+++ Bill william compton +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11433 +++$+++ 11433 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.309219380E09 +++$+++ Arsonal, please take a look there.  +++$+++ :Arsonal, please take a look there. [[User:Bill william compton|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><font color="#009900"><sup></sup> — Bill william compton</font></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Bill william compton|<font color="#000000">Talk</font>]]</sup>   17:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

273578 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I am not going to debate this with you, and I don't think that Sarah should, either.  Your badgering me and complaining about me has gone beyond anything even sane.  Why don't you tell us all what you want.  What exactly ''do'' you want Ted?  I suspect anyone with half a brain can figure this one out.  What I don't understand is why you haven't been blocked already, for clear harassment.   Any other editor would have by now.  If nobody stops your behavior, I will take further action and that is not a threat, but a promise.04:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ I am not going to debate this with you, and I don't think that Sarah should, either.  Your badgering me and complaining about me has gone beyond anything even sane.  Why don't you tell us all what you want.  What exactly ''do'' you want Ted?  I suspect anyone with half a brain can figure this one out.  What I don't understand is why you haven't been blocked already, for clear harassment.   Any other editor would have by now.  If nobody stops your behavior, I will take further action and that is not a threat, but a promise.04:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
273579 +++$+++ TedFrank +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273578 +++$+++ 273578 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.171973880E09 +++$+++ I want you to stop harassing me, stop making personal attacks, stop threatening me with lawsuits, and stop reflexively reverting legitimate edits I make.  I have been acting in good faith: for example, when I created a controversial article (as a compromise to avoid problems of undue weight), I added a POV tag, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Baron & Budd Script Memo controversy\u200e|proposed an AfD]].  In contrast, you have deleted my edits on multiple articles (even when they were factual corrections of issues as neutral as federal jurisdictional law), and have personally attacked me for adding POV tags when I have documented the violations of NPOV in the talk page. --  +++$+++ :I want you to stop harassing me, stop making personal attacks, stop threatening me with lawsuits, and stop reflexively reverting legitimate edits I make.  I have been acting in good faith: for example, when I created a controversial article (as a compromise to avoid problems of undue weight), I added a POV tag, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron & Budd Script Memo controversy‎|proposed an AfD]].  In contrast, you have deleted my edits on multiple articles (even when they were factual corrections of issues as neutral as federal jurisdictional law), and have personally attacked me for adding POV tags when I have documented the violations of NPOV in the talk page. -- [[User:TedFrank|TedFrank]] 04:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
273580 +++$+++ TedFrank +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273578 +++$+++ 273579 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.171975560E09 +++$+++ Example of bad faith harassment from Jance: I added a NPOV factoid to the Fred Baron article that came from Professor Issacharoff.  Issacharoff is well known as a [http:\/\/www.pbs.org\/newshour\/bb\/congress\/jan-june05\/lawsuits_2-11.html supporter of the plaintiffs' bar]; I disagree with him about a lot, but I wanted a balanced article, so I included his law review article on asbestos litigation which had a notable fact about Baron. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Frederick_Baron&diff=next&oldid=109423446 Jance simply deleted my edit with the misleading comment ''(REmove POV and blatant smear introduction)''] Jance is indiscriminately deleting my edits simply to harass me. --  +++$+++ ::Example of bad faith harassment from Jance: I added a NPOV factoid to the Fred Baron article that came from Professor Issacharoff.  Issacharoff is well known as a [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/congress/jan-june05/lawsuits_2-11.html supporter of the plaintiffs' bar]; I disagree with him about a lot, but I wanted a balanced article, so I included his law review article on asbestos litigation which had a notable fact about Baron. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frederick_Baron&diff=next&oldid=109423446 Jance simply deleted my edit with the misleading comment ''(REmove POV and blatant smear introduction)''] Jance is indiscriminately deleting my edits simply to harass me. -- [[User:TedFrank|TedFrank]] 04:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

11435 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11435 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-30 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.309434600E09 +++$+++ Would you happen to know what the law on freedom of panorama in Indonesia is? [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Buildings_and_sculptures_as_works_of_art Commons has no information about it]. Thanks!  +++$+++ Would you happen to know what the law on freedom of panorama in Indonesia is? [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Buildings_and_sculptures_as_works_of_art Commons has no information about it]. Thanks! [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 04:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
11436 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11435 +++$+++ 11435 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.309542000E09 +++$+++ The copyright holder would be the work's original creator. The owner is the person who is reproducing the work using the forms mentioned above (I think). Articles 19 and 20 deal with [[personality rights]] if you take portraits of persons. You'd have to take this section up with the folks at the Commons if you want a definite answer on whether or not freedom of panorama can be derived from this. (I think it can.) Is there a subject you have in mind that you were looking to apply this freedom to? \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :The copyright holder would be the work's original creator. The owner is the person who is reproducing the work using the forms mentioned above (I think). Articles 19 and 20 deal with [[personality rights]] if you take portraits of persons. You'd have to take this section up with the folks at the Commons if you want a definite answer on whether or not freedom of panorama can be derived from this. (I think it can.) Is there a subject you have in mind that you were looking to apply this freedom to? —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 10:40, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
11437 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11435 +++$+++ 11436 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.309596120E09 +++$+++ Can't upload the pictures just yet (still in Lampung) but I have pictures of the East Lampung regent's office, the government-owned Islamic Center in Sukadana, the Metro mayor's office, the fountain in Metro town square, and Al-Taqwa mosque in Metro. I will be expanding the [[Metro, Indonesia]] article after I return to Yogyakarta, so I wanted to check to see if FoP applied or not.  +++$+++ ::Can't upload the pictures just yet (still in Lampung) but I have pictures of the East Lampung regent's office, the government-owned Islamic Center in Sukadana, the Metro mayor's office, the fountain in Metro town square, and Al-Taqwa mosque in Metro. I will be expanding the [[Metro, Indonesia]] article after I return to Yogyakarta, so I wanted to check to see if FoP applied or not. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 01:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
11438 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11435 +++$+++ 11437 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309599240E09 +++$+++ You should be fine. I've not seen any architectural photos of Indonesia being taken down because of a FoP violation. To be honest, not many people understand Indonesian copyright law, so if it's not a blatant violation, it gets left alone. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::You should be fine. I've not seen any architectural photos of Indonesia being taken down because of a FoP violation. To be honest, not many people understand Indonesian copyright law, so if it's not a blatant violation, it gets left alone. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 02:34, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
11439 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11435 +++$+++ 11438 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.309778220E09 +++$+++ Including Indonesians themselves. I've been rather busy, and I will have a good 2 or 3 hours of uploading pictures (to Commons, FB, and Flickr) when I get back to Jogja. Thanks for the help!  +++$+++ ::::Including Indonesians themselves. I've been rather busy, and I will have a good 2 or 3 hours of uploading pictures (to Commons, FB, and Flickr) when I get back to Jogja. Thanks for the help! [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 04:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

535724 +++$+++ For great justice. +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-05 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.144279860E09 +++$+++ Hey there Amalas - you added a cleanup tag to Orlando, and I'm intersted as to why - I cleaned up the multiple Games titles - are there other suggestions you have? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hey there Amalas - you added a cleanup tag to Orlando, and I'm intersted as to why - I cleaned up the multiple Games titles - are there other suggestions you have? Thanks, [[User:For great justice.|For great justice.]] 16:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
535725 +++$+++ For great justice. +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535724 +++$+++ 535724 +++$+++ 2006-04-05 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.144281540E09 +++$+++ Cool! Thanks!  +++$+++ :Cool! Thanks! [[User:For great justice.|For great justice.]] 16:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

273582 +++$+++ Andjam +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-19 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.171924740E09 +++$+++ Also, I didn't use a template yesterday. Thanks,  +++$+++ Also, I didn't use a template yesterday. Thanks, [[User:Andjam|Andjam]] 14:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
273583 +++$+++ Andjam +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273582 +++$+++ 273582 +++$+++ 2007-02-19 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.171925880E09 +++$+++ Can you please withdraw your accusation that I used a template on her yesterday? In response to your comments, I'll try to avoid posting on her talk page in future. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Can you please withdraw your accusation that I used a template on her yesterday? In response to your comments, I'll try to avoid posting on her talk page in future. Thanks, [[User:Andjam|Andjam]] 14:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

11440 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11440 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.309681860E09 +++$+++ Good luck with the peer review and FA nomination :\xac)  +++$+++ Good luck with the peer review and FA nomination :¬) [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 01:31, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
11441 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11440 +++$+++ 11440 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.309778340E09 +++$+++ Second the wishes. Good luck Arsonal!  +++$+++ :Second the wishes. Good luck Arsonal! [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 04:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

11442 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.310483820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for catching those typos at [[Bendera Pusaka]].  +++$+++ Thanks for catching those typos at [[Bendera Pusaka]]. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 08:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
11443 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11442 +++$+++ 11442 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.310856300E09 +++$+++ Ah gitu. Aduh ''piye'' ini... Thanks Gunkarta (and Arsonal)  +++$+++ :Ah gitu. Aduh ''piye'' ini... Thanks Gunkarta (and Arsonal) [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 15:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

273587 +++$+++ Luna Santin +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273587 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-21 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.172128620E09 +++$+++ Thought you might like to know about this thread. Currently, it looks like Jance has been blocked indefinitely, due to some heated comments and legal threats. You seemed to be at least somewhat familiar with this case, so was wondering if you might comment on the events leading up to this, or any other relevant material. Thanks if you do, understand if you don't. &ndash; <span style=\"font-family: Garamond\"> +++$+++ Thought you might like to know about this thread. Currently, it looks like Jance has been blocked indefinitely, due to some heated comments and legal threats. You seemed to be at least somewhat familiar with this case, so was wondering if you might comment on the events leading up to this, or any other relevant material. Thanks if you do, understand if you don't. &ndash; <span style="font-family: Garamond">[[User:Luna Santin|<font color="#1E90FF">'''Luna Santin'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Luna Santin|talk]])</span> 23:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
273588 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273587 +++$+++ 273587 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.172131500E09 +++$+++ This situation has become extremely serious. Prior to today's developments I had received comments from Jance but been unable to follow all of them. Please take a look at the ANI discussion. Thanks,  +++$+++ :This situation has become extremely serious. Prior to today's developments I had received comments from Jance but been unable to follow all of them. Please take a look at the ANI discussion. Thanks, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 00:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

11444 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310581440E09 +++$+++ I was just wondering if you had also seen my previous reply, made in a new section below the copyedit notes? [[Talk:Chinese Indonesians#CHH]]  +++$+++ I was just wondering if you had also seen my previous reply, made in a new section below the copyedit notes? [[Talk:Chinese Indonesians#CHH]] [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 11:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
11445 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11444 +++$+++ 11444 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.310581680E09 +++$+++ I did, thanks. I just haven't had the chance to go over the source again to see how everything fits together. :) \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :I did, thanks. I just haven't had the chance to go over the source again to see how everything fits together. :) —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 11:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

273589 +++$+++ beneaththelandslide +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-22 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.172137620E09 +++$+++ It would be a pity for this project to loose any of us. I am sorry.  +++$+++ It would be a pity for this project to loose any of us. I am sorry. [[User:beneaththelandslide|michael]] <sup>[[User_talk:beneaththelandslide|talk]]</sup> 01:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
273590 +++$+++ beneaththelandslide +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273589 +++$+++ 273589 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.172173200E09 +++$+++ If you would like to tell me what you think, honestly, no holds barred, do not hesitate.  +++$+++ :If you would like to tell me what you think, honestly, no holds barred, do not hesitate. [[User:beneaththelandslide|michael]] <sup>[[User_talk:beneaththelandslide|talk]]</sup> 11:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
273591 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273589 +++$+++ 273590 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.172175360E09 +++$+++ Thankyou Michael, I appreciate your message and I agree that neither off us should leave over it. I want you to know that this honestly is not about you. You ask what I think, I think you're an excellent editor, but I wish you would tone down your responses to other people. The regular editors might be used to it but I fear that new people might look at some of those pages and be scared off contributing at all. My block of you was only for 24 hours, it wasn't a long block and I would have unblocked you straight away if you had indicated that you understood that abusing people was not on and that you would try to be more careful in future. It concerns me that you think you don't have to follow NPA and CIVIL just because you don't intend being an admin and It concerns me more that other people seem to be condoning that idea. But thankyou for your kind apology, I do appreciate it. ''' +++$+++ ::Thankyou Michael, I appreciate your message and I agree that neither off us should leave over it. I want you to know that this honestly is not about you. You ask what I think, I think you're an excellent editor, but I wish you would tone down your responses to other people. The regular editors might be used to it but I fear that new people might look at some of those pages and be scared off contributing at all. My block of you was only for 24 hours, it wasn't a long block and I would have unblocked you straight away if you had indicated that you understood that abusing people was not on and that you would try to be more careful in future. It concerns me that you think you don't have to follow NPA and CIVIL just because you don't intend being an admin and It concerns me more that other people seem to be condoning that idea. But thankyou for your kind apology, I do appreciate it. '''[[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah]]''' 12:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

11446 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-16 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310856420E09 +++$+++ I am working on an article for the Malari incident (currently at [[User:Crisco 1492\/Malari incident]]) and I was wondering if you have any free pictures (perhaps in the Habibie book, but I doubt it). Thanks.  +++$+++ I am working on an article for the Malari incident (currently at [[User:Crisco 1492/Malari incident]]) and I was wondering if you have any free pictures (perhaps in the Habibie book, but I doubt it). Thanks. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 15:47, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
11447 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11446 +++$+++ 11446 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.310870700E09 +++$+++ The Habibie book only covers the period of his vice presidency, despite its shortness, and some moments of his life and career. A free picture of the Malari incident would be next to impossible to obtain unless you can get an OTRS permission on one of the press photos. On the draft itself, I think you're going too far back on the background. The first and second paragraphs pose little relevance to Malari's cause. Pages 1024\u20131028 of Benny Setiono's ''[http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=CH0p3zHladEC Tionghoa Dalam Pusaran Politik]'' will give you a more detailed account of the incident, whose main roots go back to 1973 if you read the end of the previous chapter. I plan on buying this book before I leave Jakarta. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :The Habibie book only covers the period of his vice presidency, despite its shortness, and some moments of his life and career. A free picture of the Malari incident would be next to impossible to obtain unless you can get an OTRS permission on one of the press photos. On the draft itself, I think you're going too far back on the background. The first and second paragraphs pose little relevance to Malari's cause. Pages 1024–1028 of Benny Setiono's ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=CH0p3zHladEC Tionghoa Dalam Pusaran Politik]'' will give you a more detailed account of the incident, whose main roots go back to 1973 if you read the end of the previous chapter. I plan on buying this book before I leave Jakarta. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 19:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
11448 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11446 +++$+++ 11447 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310882700E09 +++$+++ Just worried that the general context will be lost on most readers; I wanted to be thorough. Thanks for the input, I'll try and merge the two paragraphs (1 & 2).<small> As for the book, it may be hard to find. The Gramedias in Jogja don't even have it in their computer systems anymore.<\/small>  +++$+++ ::Just worried that the general context will be lost on most readers; I wanted to be thorough. Thanks for the input, I'll try and merge the two paragraphs (1 & 2).<small> As for the book, it may be hard to find. The Gramedias in Jogja don't even have it in their computer systems anymore.</small> [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 23:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
11449 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11446 +++$+++ 11448 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310883600E09 +++$+++ Any guesses as to the copyright status of [http:\/\/www.jakarta.go.id\/jakv1\/encyclopedia\/detail\/1772 this]?  +++$+++ :::Any guesses as to the copyright status of [http://www.jakarta.go.id/jakv1/encyclopedia/detail/1772 this]? [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 23:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
11450 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11446 +++$+++ 11449 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310898000E09 +++$+++ Most likely copyrighted, even if it's a government website. You should note that [[commons:Template:PD-IDGov]] does not apply to regional governments, whether it be provincial or village (kelurahan). Even if it did apply, the website has a copyright notice. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ ::::Most likely copyrighted, even if it's a government website. You should note that [[commons:Template:PD-IDGov]] does not apply to regional governments, whether it be provincial or village (kelurahan). Even if it did apply, the website has a copyright notice. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 03:20, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
11451 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11446 +++$+++ 11450 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.310900220E09 +++$+++ I see. Yes, better to be safe than sorry. [[id:Malari|The Indonesian article]] uses a fair-use image, so I guess we should use one too.  +++$+++ :::::I see. Yes, better to be safe than sorry. [[id:Malari|The Indonesian article]] uses a fair-use image, so I guess we should use one too. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 03:57, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

273592 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.172233320E09 +++$+++ Sarah, I apologise for the damage that my unblock has caused. At the time I presumed that you were away and did not receive my email in time. I do hope that I am not licensing him to attack you or any others, or contempt for your performance as an administrator which I find to be excellent, but rather that I unblocked him by looking at the responses on his talk page, because it appeared to give the outcome that would be the best for the future. Unfortunately the opposite appears not to have been the case for all. I do appreciate your hard work here over the last 1+ year. ''' +++$+++ Sarah, I apologise for the damage that my unblock has caused. At the time I presumed that you were away and did not receive my email in time. I do hope that I am not licensing him to attack you or any others, or contempt for your performance as an administrator which I find to be excellent, but rather that I unblocked him by looking at the responses on his talk page, because it appeared to give the outcome that would be the best for the future. Unfortunately the opposite appears not to have been the case for all. I do appreciate your hard work here over the last 1+ year. '''[[User:Blnguyen|Blnguyen]]'''  ([[User talk:Blnguyen|bananabucket]]) 04:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
273593 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273592 +++$+++ 273592 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 06:15:00 +++$+++ 1.172326500E09 +++$+++ But I hoped we can all leave this in the past now and move on. I would hate for this to cause any rifts between any of us. ''' +++$+++ :But I hoped we can all leave this in the past now and move on. I would hate for this to cause any rifts between any of us. '''[[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah]]''' 06:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

273595 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273595 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-22 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.172150340E09 +++$+++ Only through clicking the signatures in the above posts was I able to learn the reason your name suddenly went redlink. As you can imagine, I, and a great many others, earnestly hope this is strictly a temporary situation. I've myself been learning about some of the ups and downs of adminship&mdash;but the downs will be worse than I feared if they cost us the services of one of our sanest and most level-headed people. Be well.  +++$+++ Only through clicking the signatures in the above posts was I able to learn the reason your name suddenly went redlink. As you can imagine, I, and a great many others, earnestly hope this is strictly a temporary situation. I've myself been learning about some of the ups and downs of adminship&mdash;but the downs will be worse than I feared if they cost us the services of one of our sanest and most level-headed people. Be well. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 05:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
273596 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273595 +++$+++ 273595 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.172150940E09 +++$+++ Seconded. I hope this is stylistic (shazam!) rather than indicative! ++ +++$+++ :Seconded. I hope this is stylistic (shazam!) rather than indicative! ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 05:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
273597 +++$+++ Tachikoma +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273595 +++$+++ 273596 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.172169900E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I tried to e-mail you, but you've turned off your mail access. You're welcome to e-mail me if you want to keep things off-wiki. I didn't fully investigate the reasons for your departure, but I do wish that things hadn't come to this. I think you're a great user and admin, and Wikipedia will be a poorer place without you. I hope that this wikibreak will just be a temporary one, but whatever you choose to do, I wish you all the best. -- +++$+++ ::Hi Sarah, I tried to e-mail you, but you've turned off your mail access. You're welcome to e-mail me if you want to keep things off-wiki. I didn't fully investigate the reasons for your departure, but I do wish that things hadn't come to this. I think you're a great user and admin, and Wikipedia will be a poorer place without you. I hope that this wikibreak will just be a temporary one, but whatever you choose to do, I wish you all the best. --[[User:Tachikoma|<font face="arial" color="#8652b9">''Kyok''</font>]][[User talk:Tachikoma|<font face="arial" color="#BA55D3">''o''</font>]] 10:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
273598 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273595 +++$+++ 273595 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.172172540E09 +++$+++ I really hope this is just a temporary calm-down thing. Take all the time you need, but please do come back - we need people like you around here. All the best, &ndash; <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ :I really hope this is just a temporary calm-down thing. Take all the time you need, but please do come back - we need people like you around here. All the best, &ndash; <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|'''dzasta''']]</span> 11:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
273599 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273595 +++$+++ 273598 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.172174820E09 +++$+++ I understand the need for time out - from what I see, you are completely within your right to feel the way you do. But come back please!!  +++$+++ ::I understand the need for time out - from what I see, you are completely within your right to feel the way you do. But come back please!! [[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 12:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

11452 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-17 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.310931240E09 +++$+++ I was wondering if you wanted to work together on another project. Right now I have [[User:Crisco 1492\/Violence against Chinese Indonesians]] going, and it promises to be a pretty long haul. I have prepared a rough outline of what I'm planning to do, but any input from you would be greatly appreciated. (Right now I'm doing some easy stuff first, but I plan starting the sections on the stuff we don't have later)  +++$+++ I was wondering if you wanted to work together on another project. Right now I have [[User:Crisco 1492/Violence against Chinese Indonesians]] going, and it promises to be a pretty long haul. I have prepared a rough outline of what I'm planning to do, but any input from you would be greatly appreciated. (Right now I'm doing some easy stuff first, but I plan starting the sections on the stuff we don't have later) [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 12:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
11453 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11452 +++$+++ 11452 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.310933340E09 +++$+++ \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :—<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 13:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
11454 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11452 +++$+++ 11453 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310933880E09 +++$+++ Indeed. A discrimination against Chinese Indonesians article would do well too, but I'm worried it would end up too long. Even if we were just to write sparingly on the minor incidents, such as the 1946 Tangerang killings, the violence alone could be over 20kb I think. I will move the current draft to [[User:Crisco 1492\/Discrimination against Chinese Indonesians]] and try to work on the violence angle first. Please feel free to add a bit more about discrimination (including the legislation) as you wish. I have a paper I wrote when I still planned on doing my thesis on the status of Chinese Indonesians that might offer a guideline, but I wince now when I read the Indonesian I used.  +++$+++ ::Indeed. A discrimination against Chinese Indonesians article would do well too, but I'm worried it would end up too long. Even if we were just to write sparingly on the minor incidents, such as the 1946 Tangerang killings, the violence alone could be over 20kb I think. I will move the current draft to [[User:Crisco 1492/Discrimination against Chinese Indonesians]] and try to work on the violence angle first. Please feel free to add a bit more about discrimination (including the legislation) as you wish. I have a paper I wrote when I still planned on doing my thesis on the status of Chinese Indonesians that might offer a guideline, but I wince now when I read the Indonesian I used. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 13:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
11455 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11452 +++$+++ 11454 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.310934840E09 +++$+++ That's fine by me. Considering that I've put some thought into the process of writing articles on Chinese Indonesians, I will probably transform my [[User:Arsonal\/Indonesia sandbox\/Chinese Indonesian|Chinese Indonesian sandbox]] to a suggested guidelines page. This will save us from the need to dig up old discussions in the future. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::That's fine by me. Considering that I've put some thought into the process of writing articles on Chinese Indonesians, I will probably transform my [[User:Arsonal/Indonesia sandbox/Chinese Indonesian|Chinese Indonesian sandbox]] to a suggested guidelines page. This will save us from the need to dig up old discussions in the future. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 13:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
11456 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11452 +++$+++ 11452 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.310935260E09 +++$+++ Good idea. It is a much-written about topic, so there may be quite a few to write.  +++$+++ :Good idea. It is a much-written about topic, so there may be quite a few to write. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 13:41, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

535741 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-03 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.146690660E09 +++$+++ On behalf of the Barnstar Brigade, I have just awarded you with the Working Woman's Barnstar on your User Page. Congratulations!  +++$+++ On behalf of the Barnstar Brigade, I have just awarded you with the Working Woman's Barnstar on your User Page. Congratulations! [[User:Kukini|Kuki]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">ni</font>]] 14:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
535742 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535741 +++$+++ 535741 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.146690960E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. I actually stub articles in an unsorted fashion often, and have been impressed with your work following behind me. Also...I cannot tell you how many times I have stopped while driving through Rolla to have lunch at the Panera just off campus. Small world.  +++$+++ :You are very welcome. I actually stub articles in an unsorted fashion often, and have been impressed with your work following behind me. Also...I cannot tell you how many times I have stopped while driving through Rolla to have lunch at the Panera just off campus. Small world. [[User:Kukini|Kuki]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">ni</font>]] 14:16, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
535743 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535741 +++$+++ 535742 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.146692760E09 +++$+++ Just a thought...it might be best to copy things from your user page over deleting them and pasting. It is generally preferred to not delete from one's talk page. Many wikipedians consider it a form of vandalism. I am NOT saying what you just did was vandalism, by the way. Just trying to be a friendly neighbor.  +++$+++ ::Just a thought...it might be best to copy things from your user page over deleting them and pasting. It is generally preferred to not delete from one's talk page. Many wikipedians consider it a form of vandalism. I am NOT saying what you just did was vandalism, by the way. Just trying to be a friendly neighbor. [[User:Kukini|Kuki]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">ni</font>]] 14:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
535744 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535741 +++$+++ 535743 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.146695040E09 +++$+++ People generally copy them from talk to user page, unless they are awarded on the user page, as I did for you. No worries. Peace,  +++$+++ :::People generally copy them from talk to user page, unless they are awarded on the user page, as I did for you. No worries. Peace, [[User:Kukini|Kuki]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">ni</font>]] 15:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

273600 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-22 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.172175360E09 +++$+++ Guys, please, I appreciate your messages but dramatic departures followed by \"please don't go\" pages make me cringe and it's not what I want. This isn't about Michael. It's about a whole lot of things and the emails I got about Michael were just the final straw. I consider myself to be joining John in Hotel Wiki Recovery. I don't consider myself to be leaving, so there really is no need for this. ''' +++$+++ Guys, please, I appreciate your messages but dramatic departures followed by "please don't go" pages make me cringe and it's not what I want. This isn't about Michael. It's about a whole lot of things and the emails I got about Michael were just the final straw. I consider myself to be joining John in Hotel Wiki Recovery. I don't consider myself to be leaving, so there really is no need for this. '''[[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah]]''' 12:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
273601 +++$+++ Orangemonster2k1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.172319240E09 +++$+++ Hotel Wiki....I hear they have a huge pool there! :)  Enjoy you \"stay\" and we will see you when you get back.  Bring me back a souvenir :) -  +++$+++ ::Hotel Wiki....I hear they have a huge pool there! :)  Enjoy you "stay" and we will see you when you get back.  Bring me back a souvenir :) - [[User:Orangemonster2k1|SVRTVDude]] <sup>([[User_talk:Orangemonster2k1|Yell]] - [[Special:Contributions/Orangemonster2k1|Toil]])</sup> 04:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
273602 +++$+++ BenAveling +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.172209200E09 +++$+++ I've asked Blnguyen where consensus was reached that Michael should be allow to make PAs on people.  All I see is what's on Michael's page, which I don't consider sufficent.  If I don't receive satisfaction, I'll be going to WP:AN and starting a discussion on whether Michael gets to serve the remaining 02:34 of the block you placed on him. Regards,  +++$+++ :I've asked Blnguyen where consensus was reached that Michael should be allow to make PAs on people.  All I see is what's on Michael's page, which I don't consider sufficent.  If I don't receive satisfaction, I'll be going to WP:AN and starting a discussion on whether Michael gets to serve the remaining 02:34 of the block you placed on him. Regards, [[User talk:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 21:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
273603 +++$+++ Musical Linguist +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ 273602 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.172209740E09 +++$+++ I looked at that as well, and was concerned that there's no record of discussion at any admin noticeboard, and no evidence of any attempt to discuss with Sarah before unblocking. Unblocking should never be done without discussing with the blocking admin and perhaps also some kind of AN\/I discussion, unless there's a ''clear'' and obvious error (e.g. the wrong person was blocked). Personally, though, I'd feel that reinstating the remainder of the block at this stage would be punitive. Sarah, I know you don't want lots of \"please don't go\" messages on your talk page, so I won't leave one, but I just want to say you have my full support, and I'll be looking forward to seeing your name in blue again. Thanks for your efforts to be so fair to Gordon at [[Wikipedia:Community noticeboard]].  +++$+++ ::I looked at that as well, and was concerned that there's no record of discussion at any admin noticeboard, and no evidence of any attempt to discuss with Sarah before unblocking. Unblocking should never be done without discussing with the blocking admin and perhaps also some kind of AN/I discussion, unless there's a ''clear'' and obvious error (e.g. the wrong person was blocked). Personally, though, I'd feel that reinstating the remainder of the block at this stage would be punitive. Sarah, I know you don't want lots of "please don't go" messages on your talk page, so I won't leave one, but I just want to say you have my full support, and I'll be looking forward to seeing your name in blue again. Thanks for your efforts to be so fair to Gordon at [[Wikipedia:Community noticeboard]]. [[User:Musical Linguist|Musical L]][[User talk:Musical Linguist|inguist]] 21:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
273604 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ 273603 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.172209980E09 +++$+++ I concur with Musical Linguist that we don't reinstate a couple of hours of a block two days after the fact, even if we disagree with the unblocking. It is in order, however, to tell the user he was treated leniently this time and he can't count on it happening again if he reoffends.  +++$+++ :::I concur with Musical Linguist that we don't reinstate a couple of hours of a block two days after the fact, even if we disagree with the unblocking. It is in order, however, to tell the user he was treated leniently this time and he can't count on it happening again if he reoffends. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 21:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
273605 +++$+++ BenAveling +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ 273604 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.172242620E09 +++$+++ Agreed, agreed.  Everyone seems to be on the same page on this.  Regards,  +++$+++ ::::Agreed, agreed.  Everyone seems to be on the same page on this.  Regards, [[User talk:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 06:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
273606 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.172243280E09 +++$+++ Not me. The reason why we are forbidden from using our admin tools when we are involved in a dispute is because even the best of admins (which Sarah is), when attacked and mistreated (as Sarah was), may find their judgment sufficiently distorted by events that their actions do not accord with community will. Blocking Michael was a minor breach of policy, which was quickly correctly by another admin. I endorse blnguyen's unblock on those grounds, and I desperately hope blnguyen isn't made a scapegoat over Sarah's decision to take a break.  +++$+++ :Not me. The reason why we are forbidden from using our admin tools when we are involved in a dispute is because even the best of admins (which Sarah is), when attacked and mistreated (as Sarah was), may find their judgment sufficiently distorted by events that their actions do not accord with community will. Blocking Michael was a minor breach of policy, which was quickly correctly by another admin. I endorse blnguyen's unblock on those grounds, and I desperately hope blnguyen isn't made a scapegoat over Sarah's decision to take a break. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 07:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
273607 +++$+++ BenAveling +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ 273606 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.172267100E09 +++$+++ Even if there had been a content dispute between Michael and Sarah, which I don't see, the block was made on valid grounds and should not have been revoked without either Sarah's OK, or a discussion at [[WP:AN]].  Sarah made a judgement call that the community would back her, and it surprises me that you apparently believe that this confidence in her own ability to recognise a PA was such a bad idea that it overrides the fact that the block was justified.  The only reason to unblock should have been to then reblock as a clear signal to Michael that it's not personal, it's just plain unacceptable all round.  But nobody is going to be made a scapegoat, or be punished over this, more than they already have been, and I'm not sure why you seem to want to run the risk of turning it back into a live issue.  Regards,  +++$+++ ::Even if there had been a content dispute between Michael and Sarah, which I don't see, the block was made on valid grounds and should not have been revoked without either Sarah's OK, or a discussion at [[WP:AN]].  Sarah made a judgement call that the community would back her, and it surprises me that you apparently believe that this confidence in her own ability to recognise a PA was such a bad idea that it overrides the fact that the block was justified.  The only reason to unblock should have been to then reblock as a clear signal to Michael that it's not personal, it's just plain unacceptable all round.  But nobody is going to be made a scapegoat, or be punished over this, more than they already have been, and I'm not sure why you seem to want to run the risk of turning it back into a live issue.  Regards, [[User talk:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 13:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
273608 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ 273607 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.172319900E09 +++$+++ That's an interesting little passive-aggressive trick: I can't reply to your last accusation without validating it.  +++$+++ :::That's an interesting little passive-aggressive trick: I can't reply to your last accusation without validating it. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 04:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
273609 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ 273608 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.172320680E09 +++$+++ Well I can.  Hesperian was merely saying don't make Blng the scapegoat and I'm certain the last thing he (Hesp.) wants to do is re-liven the issue.  Blng has explained his rationale and apologised to Sarah above. That should have been the end of it, but it does seem from my reading of this that that some would like to have the last word and pin some blame. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Well I can.  Hesperian was merely saying don't make Blng the scapegoat and I'm certain the last thing he (Hesp.) wants to do is re-liven the issue.  Blng has explained his rationale and apologised to Sarah above. That should have been the end of it, but it does seem from my reading of this that that some would like to have the last word and pin some blame. &mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 04:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
273610 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273600 +++$+++ 273607 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.172325240E09 +++$+++ However...neither Michael or Blnguyen are in any way responsible for my break and I don't want either of them feeling they may be. I've been feeling wiki-exhausted since dealing with Merbabu's professor and this was just a case of the final straw. Also, I have some real life family stuff that I need to deal with and I'd probably be having to cut back my Wiki time now anyway. So I don't blame anyone here and I'm not angry or upset with anyone who was involved or who has commented since. You boys are all very special and I don't want you arguing about it. There isn't anything to argue about as far as I'm concerned. It's all resolved and dealt with and in the past. ''' +++$+++ :::However...neither Michael or Blnguyen are in any way responsible for my break and I don't want either of them feeling they may be. I've been feeling wiki-exhausted since dealing with Merbabu's professor and this was just a case of the final straw. Also, I have some real life family stuff that I need to deal with and I'd probably be having to cut back my Wiki time now anyway. So I don't blame anyone here and I'm not angry or upset with anyone who was involved or who has commented since. You boys are all very special and I don't want you arguing about it. There isn't anything to argue about as far as I'm concerned. It's all resolved and dealt with and in the past. '''[[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah]]''' 05:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

11457 +++$+++ Penyulap +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311274860E09 +++$+++ Terima Kasih untuk tolong dalam article ISS, saya buat salah itu. Terima Kasih Sobat ! <span style=\"text-shadow:#c5C3e3  0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ Terima Kasih untuk tolong dalam article ISS, saya buat salah itu. Terima Kasih Sobat ! <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3  0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User:Penyulap|<span style="color:#002100">'''Penyulap'''</span>]]</span><sub>[[User talk:Penyulap|<span style="color:07AA07">''' talk'''</span>]]</sub> 12:01, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
11458 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11457 +++$+++ 11457 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311275160E09 +++$+++ Tidak masalah. Kerja yang bagus. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :Tidak masalah. Kerja yang bagus. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 12:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

11460 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311534240E09 +++$+++ Hi Arsonal, my article regarding [[User:Crisco 1492\/Discrimination against Chinese Indonesians|discrimination against Chinese Indonesians]] is about 70% complete. Could you take a look at it and let me know what you think> (Aside from the lead, which will be expanded last).  +++$+++ Hi Arsonal, my article regarding [[User:Crisco 1492/Discrimination against Chinese Indonesians|discrimination against Chinese Indonesians]] is about 70% complete. Could you take a look at it and let me know what you think> (Aside from the lead, which will be expanded last). [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 12:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
11461 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11460 +++$+++ 11460 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311719160E09 +++$+++ It's too choppy, in my opinion, especially since you took some text from articles of varying quality as well. There are multiple Manual of Style issues that need to be addressed, such as proper introduction of abbreviations and terminology. The brevity of cohesive analysis presents a NPOV issue because the facts themselves are sometimes blurry, so they can't be written out as information to be accepted immediately. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :It's too choppy, in my opinion, especially since you took some text from articles of varying quality as well. There are multiple Manual of Style issues that need to be addressed, such as proper introduction of abbreviations and terminology. The brevity of cohesive analysis presents a NPOV issue because the facts themselves are sometimes blurry, so they can't be written out as information to be accepted immediately. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 15:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
11462 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11460 +++$+++ 11461 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311798480E09 +++$+++ Alright, thanks. I'll try and work on it some more. I just moved and am currently stuck using web cafes, so I haven't had a chance to use online sources. Any other kinds of analysis for inclusion?  +++$+++ ::Alright, thanks. I'll try and work on it some more. I just moved and am currently stuck using web cafes, so I haven't had a chance to use online sources. Any other kinds of analysis for inclusion? [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 13:28, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
11463 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11460 +++$+++ 11462 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311825120E09 +++$+++ I'll give it another run sometime later. But first, I think you should fully develop the [[1740 Batavia massacre]] article first before going any further in the colonial period. It's currently the only poorly written one of the three major violent incidents against ethnic Chinese. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::I'll give it another run sometime later. But first, I think you should fully develop the [[1740 Batavia massacre]] article first before going any further in the colonial period. It's currently the only poorly written one of the three major violent incidents against ethnic Chinese. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 20:52, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
11464 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11460 +++$+++ 11463 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.311842160E09 +++$+++ Once I get a modem, I will get on that. I may not be able to get it to GA standards, but hopefully it can be expanded to at least a B.  +++$+++ ::::Once I get a modem, I will get on that. I may not be able to get it to GA standards, but hopefully it can be expanded to at least a B. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 01:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
11465 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11460 +++$+++ 11464 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311866940E09 +++$+++ Have you tried the Smartfren USB modem? Not sure if they offer that around Jogja. \u2014<font face=\"Garamond\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::::Have you tried the Smartfren USB modem? Not sure if they offer that around Jogja. —<font face="Garamond" size="3">[[User:Arsonal|Arsonal]] (''[[User talk:Arsonal#top|talk]]'' + ''[[Special:Contributions/Arsonal|contribs]]'')</font>— 08:29, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
11466 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Arsonal +++$+++ 11460 +++$+++ 11465 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311884460E09 +++$+++ We're having a modem shipped from Semarang, but it will be a few days. Real-world workload is pretty bad too this week. Argh. Thanks though (and thanks for replying to the translation request)  +++$+++ ::::::We're having a modem shipped from Semarang, but it will be a few days. Real-world workload is pretty bad too this week. Argh. Thanks though (and thanks for replying to the translation request) [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 13:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

535749 +++$+++ Mangojuice +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-16 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.147827900E09 +++$+++ I have removed the {{tl|prod}} tag from [[Naw Zipporrah Sein]], which you proposed for deletion, because I feel that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  If you still feel the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{tl|prod}} template back to the article, as [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] is only for non-controversial deletions.  Instead, feel free to list it at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]].  Thanks!  +++$+++ I have removed the {{tl|prod}} tag from [[Naw Zipporrah Sein]], which you proposed for deletion, because I feel that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  If you still feel the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{tl|prod}} template back to the article, as [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] is only for non-controversial deletions.  Instead, feel free to list it at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]].  Thanks! [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 18:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
535750 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535749 +++$+++ 535749 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.147833960E09 +++$+++ I have no idea who \"Amalas\" is (aside from apparently not knowing enough to sign his\/her comments), but his\/her reasoning is not only obscure (though it suggests a peculiar lack of logic) &mdash; it ignores the plain fact that Cassandra581 has been trying to add a link to her own site (as [[User:SteveHopson|SteveHopson]] has pretty conclusively demonstrated) and then has been dishonest about that fact.  That Amalas threatens to escalate the problem doesn't fill me with confidence either; nor does the fact that he\/she seems to have chosen to issue a \"verdict\" on my action despite having failed to contact me. -- +++$+++ :I have no idea who "Amalas" is (aside from apparently not knowing enough to sign his/her comments), but his/her reasoning is not only obscure (though it suggests a peculiar lack of logic) &mdash; it ignores the plain fact that Cassandra581 has been trying to add a link to her own site (as [[User:SteveHopson|SteveHopson]] has pretty conclusively demonstrated) and then has been dishonest about that fact.  That Amalas threatens to escalate the problem doesn't fill me with confidence either; nor does the fact that he/she seems to have chosen to issue a "verdict" on my action despite having failed to contact me. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 19:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
535751 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535749 +++$+++ 535750 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.147927980E09 +++$+++ I still can't make out how your \"verdict\" was reached, as the reasoning makes no sense to me.  Moreover, your claim that editors should be permitted to add almost any links to articles is so clearly out of keeping with Wikipedia guidelines that I can only assume that I've misunderstood that too. -- +++$+++ ::I still can't make out how your "verdict" was reached, as the reasoning makes no sense to me.  Moreover, your claim that editors should be permitted to add almost any links to articles is so clearly out of keeping with Wikipedia guidelines that I can only assume that I've misunderstood that too. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 21:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

535753 +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-18 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.148008080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Timtrent|Fiddle Faddle]] 20:08, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
535754 +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535753 +++$+++ 535753 +++$+++ 2006-05-18 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.148010360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Timtrent|Fiddle Faddle]] 20:46, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

11467 +++$+++ Eliko +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-09 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.297280760E09 +++$+++ Hello, I can't understand why [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#User:Eliko at WP:TFD|you think I'm \"a brick hall\"]]. Is this just because I don't want undisputedly obvious mistakes (like outdated figures) to apear - in a template which is not likely to be deleted (even in your opinion)? Do you really want this template to contain - at the mean time - undisputedly obvious mistakes that have already been fixed in the [[Foreign relations of the Palestinian National Authority|article]]? Additionally, I don't understand why you think I'm \"''insistent on keeping two versions of this article going, one in the template, one on the actual article''\". Not really. I just want to fix undisputedly obvious mistakes in the template, and if you think you have got a better way (rather than copying from the [[Foreign relations of the Palestinian National Authority|article]]) for fixing those undisputedly obvious mistakes - you're invited to fix them in your manner, without copying! Anyway, I like you, think that: 1. there should not be two versions of the same article, and that: 2. it now looks like deletion isn't possible; I'm just adding another reason why the template can't be deleted: [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion\/Log\/2010_December 6#Template:Palestine foreign relations|The result of the original discussion was \"merge\"]], whereas the original discussion was about merging more updated documents into the [[Foreign relations of the Palestinian National Authority|article]] - which still contains the outdated documents; If the template is deleted before it's merged, the original resolution won't be fulfilled. So not only are you invited to revert the copy I did and to fix the undisputably obvious mistakes in another way (even without copying from the [[Foreign relations of the Palestinian National Authority|article]]), but you are also invited to merge the template into the article - in order to fulfill the original resolution. Note that if this had been done before, no dispute would have arisen.  +++$+++ Hello, I can't understand why [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Eliko at WP:TFD|you think I'm "a brick hall"]]. Is this just because I don't want undisputedly obvious mistakes (like outdated figures) to apear - in a template which is not likely to be deleted (even in your opinion)? Do you really want this template to contain - at the mean time - undisputedly obvious mistakes that have already been fixed in the [[Foreign relations of the Palestinian National Authority|article]]? Additionally, I don't understand why you think I'm "''insistent on keeping two versions of this article going, one in the template, one on the actual article''". Not really. I just want to fix undisputedly obvious mistakes in the template, and if you think you have got a better way (rather than copying from the [[Foreign relations of the Palestinian National Authority|article]]) for fixing those undisputedly obvious mistakes - you're invited to fix them in your manner, without copying! Anyway, I like you, think that: 1. there should not be two versions of the same article, and that: 2. it now looks like deletion isn't possible; I'm just adding another reason why the template can't be deleted: [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010_December 6#Template:Palestine foreign relations|The result of the original discussion was "merge"]], whereas the original discussion was about merging more updated documents into the [[Foreign relations of the Palestinian National Authority|article]] - which still contains the outdated documents; If the template is deleted before it's merged, the original resolution won't be fulfilled. So not only are you invited to revert the copy I did and to fix the undisputably obvious mistakes in another way (even without copying from the [[Foreign relations of the Palestinian National Authority|article]]), but you are also invited to merge the template into the article - in order to fulfill the original resolution. Note that if this had been done before, no dispute would have arisen. [[User:Eliko|Eliko]] ([[User talk:Eliko|talk]]) 11:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
11468 +++$+++ Eliko +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11467 +++$+++ 11467 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.297292460E09 +++$+++ Just let you know the truth: no part of the template was merged into the article - since the [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion\/Log\/2010_December 6#Template:Palestine foreign relations|original decision]] was made. On the contrary: There were some attempts to merge, but they were reverted (by violating the 3RR). Hope you fix that somehow.  +++$+++ :Just let you know the truth: no part of the template was merged into the article - since the [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010_December 6#Template:Palestine foreign relations|original decision]] was made. On the contrary: There were some attempts to merge, but they were reverted (by violating the 3RR). Hope you fix that somehow. [[User:Eliko|Eliko]] ([[User talk:Eliko|talk]]) 15:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

273614 +++$+++ Glen S +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.172265060E09 +++$+++ Your link's  +++$+++ Your link's [[User:Sarah Ewart|red]] - are you leaving? :( '''[[User talk:Glen S|Glen]]''' 13:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
273615 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273614 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.172267340E09 +++$+++ See Sarah's comment higher on this page.  +++$+++ ::See Sarah's comment higher on this page. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 13:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

11471 +++$+++ VernoWhitney +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-22 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.298409960E09 +++$+++ I'm curious: how was the inclusion of this subcat messing up the count? I hadn't noticed any problems before (although maybe I just wasn't looking in the right area).  +++$+++ I'm curious: how was the inclusion of this subcat messing up the count? I hadn't noticed any problems before (although maybe I just wasn't looking in the right area). [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 13:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
11472 +++$+++ VernoWhitney +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11471 +++$+++ 11471 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.299235140E09 +++$+++ It looks like I figured out [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3ACopied_and_pasted_articles_and_sections_progress&action=historysubmit&diff=416614900&oldid=415358938 the magic to the template] which solves the problem of counting any of the empty monthly categories, or at least it has in every example I've seen over the last few days. Cheers!  +++$+++ :It looks like I figured out [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3ACopied_and_pasted_articles_and_sections_progress&action=historysubmit&diff=416614900&oldid=415358938 the magic to the template] which solves the problem of counting any of the empty monthly categories, or at least it has in every example I've seen over the last few days. Cheers! [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 02:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

11473 +++$+++ Graham87 +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-23 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.298452260E09 +++$+++ Fixed, thanks for letting me know. I've also fixed a typo in your talk page notice. ''' +++$+++ Fixed, thanks for letting me know. I've also fixed a typo in your talk page notice. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 01:11, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
11474 +++$+++ Graham87 +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11473 +++$+++ 11473 +++$+++ 2011-02-23 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.298452620E09 +++$+++ [[No worries]]. :-) ''' +++$+++ :[[No worries]]. :-) '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 01:17, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

273618 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-24 06:08:00 +++$+++ 1.172326080E09 +++$+++ What the heck is going on?  I came here becaue my watchlist was about to explode, and I find out there's some hullabalo about something or another.  Sarah, will you e-mail me at some point? I hope everything is ok, and I'm sending my best to you and your family.  &mdash; +++$+++ What the heck is going on?  I came here becaue my watchlist was about to explode, and I find out there's some hullabalo about something or another.  Sarah, will you e-mail me at some point? I hope everything is ok, and I'm sending my best to you and your family.  &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 06:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
273619 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273618 +++$+++ 273618 +++$+++ 2007-02-24 10:06:00 +++$+++ 1.172340360E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  Your great work is loved and appreciated by many, please remember that. &mdash; +++$+++ :Thank you.  Your great work is loved and appreciated by many, please remember that. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 10:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

535764 +++$+++ Gingerjoos +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-02 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.149302280E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia editing. I saw your name in the [[Naval Physical and Oceanographic Laboratory]] history page. Thanks for your stub-sorting. I have a question. Is it ok to consider NPOL as a science-related article? What I mean is that it is a defence laboratory. Is that considered err...science-related. Sorry if I made any mistake. Thanks :-)  +++$+++ Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia editing. I saw your name in the [[Naval Physical and Oceanographic Laboratory]] history page. Thanks for your stub-sorting. I have a question. Is it ok to consider NPOL as a science-related article? What I mean is that it is a defence laboratory. Is that considered err...science-related. Sorry if I made any mistake. Thanks :-) [[User:Gingerjoos|anirudh]] 19:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
535765 +++$+++ Gingerjoos +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535764 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.149384960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. The oceanography stub is much better. :-) Happy editing to u too...  +++$+++ ::Thanks. The oceanography stub is much better. :-) Happy editing to u too... [[User:Gingerjoos|anirudh]] 18:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

535766 +++$+++ Gingerjoos +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-05 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.149552180E09 +++$+++ A whole lot of Indians like to take up Engineering as their career option. So we have a lot of Engineering Colleges in India. Entry to these colleges are based on examinations that are called by various names in various states. [[EAMCET]] is the examination conducted by the southern state of [[Andhra Pradesh]]. This article showed up in the stub list and I sorted it as India-univ-stub. Now, this is improper right? [[User_talk:Gingerjoos#Stub_sorting_at_EAMCET | Others feel so too...]]. I searched a lot for a better stub, but couldn't find one. Is there any tag that is more appropriate? What should I do? Thanks a lot and sorry for being too much verbose. :-) -- +++$+++ A whole lot of Indians like to take up Engineering as their career option. So we have a lot of Engineering Colleges in India. Entry to these colleges are based on examinations that are called by various names in various states. [[EAMCET]] is the examination conducted by the southern state of [[Andhra Pradesh]]. This article showed up in the stub list and I sorted it as India-univ-stub. Now, this is improper right? [[User_talk:Gingerjoos#Stub_sorting_at_EAMCET | Others feel so too...]]. I searched a lot for a better stub, but couldn't find one. Is there any tag that is more appropriate? What should I do? Thanks a lot and sorry for being too much verbose. :-) --[[User:Gingerjoos|anirudh]] 17:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
535767 +++$+++ Gingerjoos +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535766 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.149554760E09 +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|43px|left|WikiThanks]] Thanks... Orders carried out, Cap'n. :-) -- +++$+++ ::[[Image:WikiThanks.png|43px|left|WikiThanks]] Thanks... Orders carried out, Cap'n. :-) --[[User:Gingerjoos|anirudh]] 17:46, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

273624 +++$+++ Daniel.Bryant +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273624 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-06 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.173200400E09 +++$+++ But, on the happeier side, welcome back, and I hope you enjoy your new username! (By the way, given you mentioned it a while ago, I had my alternate account - Daniel-Bryant - renamed to Daniel). Cheers, and all the best, ''' +++$+++ But, on the happeier side, welcome back, and I hope you enjoy your new username! (By the way, given you mentioned it a while ago, I had my alternate account - Daniel-Bryant - renamed to Daniel). Cheers, and all the best, '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel&nbsp;Bryant</span>]]''' 09:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
273625 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273624 +++$+++ 273624 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ My dear Mr Bryant, thank you for your kind comments and welcome back message. However, you do ''not'' owe me any apology for anything at all. And I find the concept of agreeing to disagree most agreeable!;)  I intend replying to your message properly via email but I probably won't be able to now until tomorrow morning. Thankyou for your kind message, twas very much appreciated. :) 12:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :My dear Mr Bryant, thank you for your kind comments and welcome back message. However, you do ''not'' owe me any apology for anything at all. And I find the concept of agreeing to disagree most agreeable!;)  I intend replying to your message properly via email but I probably won't be able to now until tomorrow morning. Thankyou for your kind message, twas very much appreciated. :) 12:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

569892 +++$+++ C3pkeogh +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-12 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.179026040E09 +++$+++ I do believe it is a notable addition, if you saw the reasons for keeping the page I noted in the pages talk you may notice that it is not the size of the clique mentioned in the page \"clique of three schoolchildren\"  that I believe gives it a reason to be included in the encyclopedia but the fact that the page was a valid example of a social cliqe, an example that is crucial to inform a persons understanding of what a social clique actualy is.  Surly it is the purpous of an encylopedia to assist in a persons understanding\/knowlage of a topic, the topic in question being social cliques.  Best wishes  +++$+++ I do believe it is a notable addition, if you saw the reasons for keeping the page I noted in the pages talk you may notice that it is not the size of the clique mentioned in the page "clique of three schoolchildren"  that I believe gives it a reason to be included in the encyclopedia but the fact that the page was a valid example of a social cliqe, an example that is crucial to inform a persons understanding of what a social clique actualy is.  Surly it is the purpous of an encylopedia to assist in a persons understanding/knowlage of a topic, the topic in question being social cliques.  Best wishes [[User:C3pkeogh|C3pkeogh]] 20:14, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
569893 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569892 +++$+++ 569892 +++$+++ 2007-05-12 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.179026880E09 +++$+++ Please see the articles on [[:Clique|cliques]] and [[:Group (sociology)|social groups]] for encyclopedic entries on the subjects that you mention.  Your article was too specific in regards to the social group in question.  If the threshold was lowered to permit your clique an entry in the main space then literally tens of thousands of other school\/college cliques would also attempt the same thing. If you want to tell people about your clique then please do so in a blog or website and not on Wikipedia. When attempting to offer a business case for retaining an article proposed for speedy deletion, please always refer to the appropriate [[:WP:POLICY|policies and guidelines]] to demonstrate notability.  Personal beliefs are neither here nor there when assessing the deletion of an article. Regards,  +++$+++ :Please see the articles on [[:Clique|cliques]] and [[:Group (sociology)|social groups]] for encyclopedic entries on the subjects that you mention.  Your article was too specific in regards to the social group in question.  If the threshold was lowered to permit your clique an entry in the main space then literally tens of thousands of other school/college cliques would also attempt the same thing. If you want to tell people about your clique then please do so in a blog or website and not on Wikipedia. When attempting to offer a business case for retaining an article proposed for speedy deletion, please always refer to the appropriate [[:WP:POLICY|policies and guidelines]] to demonstrate notability.  Personal beliefs are neither here nor there when assessing the deletion of an article. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 20:28, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

273626 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-06 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.173200940E09 +++$+++ Welcome back, Sarah! Hope the break went well, and we'll see you in full form ASAP :) Lots has happened while you've been gone, as Daniel mentions above, and I can't say that you'll have fun reading all about it, but... well, everything happens for a reason, I guess. Take care, and enjoy the new username - [[User talk:Riana|mine should be underway pretty soon]] :). &ndash; <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ Welcome back, Sarah! Hope the break went well, and we'll see you in full form ASAP :) Lots has happened while you've been gone, as Daniel mentions above, and I can't say that you'll have fun reading all about it, but... well, everything happens for a reason, I guess. Take care, and enjoy the new username - [[User talk:Riana|mine should be underway pretty soon]] :). &ndash; <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|'''dzasta''']]</span> 09:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
273627 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273626 +++$+++ 273626 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.173209760E09 +++$+++ Thankyou my friend. :) I'm not really back at full strength yet, though. I just came on-site this morning to create an account for someone who requested account creation assistance at unblock-en-l. I will probably just continue to potter along peacefully for a while. Thank you for your email and messages, Riana. They were much appreciated. I shall be replying to you properly by email but it probably won't be until tomorrow now. I look forward to seeing you as Riana. I think it is very Cher of us to go for first name only usernames! :) ''' +++$+++ :Thankyou my friend. :) I'm not really back at full strength yet, though. I just came on-site this morning to create an account for someone who requested account creation assistance at unblock-en-l. I will probably just continue to potter along peacefully for a while. Thank you for your email and messages, Riana. They were much appreciated. I shall be replying to you properly by email but it probably won't be until tomorrow now. I look forward to seeing you as Riana. I think it is very Cher of us to go for first name only usernames! :) '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 11:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

11483 +++$+++ Dohn joe +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-10 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.305094680E09 +++$+++ Hi Dpmuk - I've got a quick question for you. I've been thinking about your position in the [[Corvette]] debate, and the more I consider it, the more I like it. I was wondering if you'd have any inclination to try to amend [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC]] to add something along the lines of what you were saying there. My understanding of it is something like: \"In the interest of reader efficiency, where there are two likely topics for a base term, the base term should be the title of one of those topics even when it is not strictly the primary topic - especially when the other topic is naturally disambiguated.\" Does that summarize your opinion? Do you have any desire to try it out? I think this language would have short-circuited the Corvette debate before it started.  +++$+++ Hi Dpmuk - I've got a quick question for you. I've been thinking about your position in the [[Corvette]] debate, and the more I consider it, the more I like it. I was wondering if you'd have any inclination to try to amend [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC]] to add something along the lines of what you were saying there. My understanding of it is something like: "In the interest of reader efficiency, where there are two likely topics for a base term, the base term should be the title of one of those topics even when it is not strictly the primary topic - especially when the other topic is naturally disambiguated." Does that summarize your opinion? Do you have any desire to try it out? I think this language would have short-circuited the Corvette debate before it started. [[User:Dohn joe|Dohn joe]] ([[User talk:Dohn joe|talk]]) 23:18, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
11484 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11483 +++$+++ 11483 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.305149700E09 +++$+++ Well I think it could be worth a try although I suspect it may be best to start with the case where one has a natural disambiguation and the other doesn't as otherwise I think the whole idea may get shot down on how we decide which one should go at the base name. If that gets accepted and seems to be working then we could think about trying to expand it. Dpmuk (talk) 14:35, 11 May 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ :Well I think it could be worth a try although I suspect it may be best to start with the case where one has a natural disambiguation and the other doesn't as otherwise I think the whole idea may get shot down on how we decide which one should go at the base name. If that gets accepted and seems to be working then we could think about trying to expand it. Dpmuk (talk) 14:35, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
11485 +++$+++ Dohn joe +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11483 +++$+++ 11484 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.305160560E09 +++$+++ I think limiting it to the natural disambiguation scenario makes sense. I also think that it might be wise to wait for a bit, looking at the flurry of activity going on right now regarding the \"educational value\" language. Maybe one of us could give it a shot in a month or so....  +++$+++ ::I think limiting it to the natural disambiguation scenario makes sense. I also think that it might be wise to wait for a bit, looking at the flurry of activity going on right now regarding the "educational value" language. Maybe one of us could give it a shot in a month or so.... [[User:Dohn joe|Dohn joe]] ([[User talk:Dohn joe|talk]]) 17:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
11486 +++$+++ Born2cycle +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11483 +++$+++ 11485 +++$+++ 2011-05-19 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.305865740E09 +++$+++ FYI, I think one of the main reasons for having a dab page at the base name when there is no clear (real) primary topic is so that page statistics are reliable indicators of usage.  That way if one of the uses does become primary, it will be clear from the page statistics.  As long as one of the uses is at the base name, there is no way to know how many users searching with that base name were actually looking for the article at the base name, or something else. <p> For example, in the case of Corvette, all we can tell from the page statistics is that the ship type is not primary.  We can't tell if the car might be.  Maybe it is.  If we move the dab page to [[Corvette]] and a few months later we observe that the page view stats for the ship type are only a fraction of those for the car, then that would be a strong indication that the car is the primary topic.  But as long as the ship type remains at the base name, we can never obtain that information.  -- +++$+++ :::FYI, I think one of the main reasons for having a dab page at the base name when there is no clear (real) primary topic is so that page statistics are reliable indicators of usage.  That way if one of the uses does become primary, it will be clear from the page statistics.  As long as one of the uses is at the base name, there is no way to know how many users searching with that base name were actually looking for the article at the base name, or something else. <p> For example, in the case of Corvette, all we can tell from the page statistics is that the ship type is not primary.  We can't tell if the car might be.  Maybe it is.  If we move the dab page to [[Corvette]] and a few months later we observe that the page view stats for the ship type are only a fraction of those for the car, then that would be a strong indication that the car is the primary topic.  But as long as the ship type remains at the base name, we can never obtain that information.  --[[User:Born2cycle|Born2cycle]] ([[User talk:Born2cycle|talk]]) 21:29, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

11487 +++$+++ Wdfarmer +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11487 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-21 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.305987840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for undoing my request for speedy deletion of the redirect: [[United States of American]].  I see now that such a redirect does fit the criteria for keeping it; it's plausible that a user could enter \"American\" instead of \"America\".  Good job. &mdash;  +++$+++ Thanks for undoing my request for speedy deletion of the redirect: [[United States of American]].  I see now that such a redirect does fit the criteria for keeping it; it's plausible that a user could enter "American" instead of "America".  Good job. &mdash; [[User:Wdfarmer|Wdfarmer]] ([[User talk:Wdfarmer|talk]]) 07:24, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
11488 +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11487 +++$+++ 11487 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.305996660E09 +++$+++ The redirect  was actually from [[Confederate States of American]].  The whole situation wasn't helped by a bot redirecting it to [[Sherman's March to the Sea]] while [[Confederate States of America]] was briefly, incorrectly, made a redirect to that page.  +++$+++ :The redirect  was actually from [[Confederate States of American]].  The whole situation wasn't helped by a bot redirecting it to [[Sherman's March to the Sea]] while [[Confederate States of America]] was briefly, incorrectly, made a redirect to that page. [[User:Dpmuk|Dpmuk]] ([[User talk:Dpmuk#top|talk]]) 09:51, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
11489 +++$+++ Wdfarmer +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11487 +++$+++ 11488 +++$+++ 2011-05-22 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.306076820E09 +++$+++ Correct, I typoed in my message. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::Correct, I typoed in my message. &mdash; [[User:Wdfarmer|Wdfarmer]] ([[User talk:Wdfarmer|talk]]) 08:07, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

273632 +++$+++ SunStar Net +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-08 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.173411300E09 +++$+++ Are there any articles you're working on that I can help you with?? --''' +++$+++ Are there any articles you're working on that I can help you with?? --'''[[User:SunStar Net|sunstar net]]<sup>[[User talk:SunStar Net|talk]]</sup>''' 19:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
273633 +++$+++ SunStar Net +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273632 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.173411360E09 +++$+++ Should you want verification, just email me! --''' +++$+++ ::Should you want verification, just email me! --'''[[User:SunStar Net|sunstar net]]<sup>[[User talk:SunStar Net|talk]]</sup>''' 19:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

11491 +++$+++ Epeefleche +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-27 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.306536120E09 +++$+++ Hi.  As you note, it is not clear to me that [[Maulvi Ghulam Rasool]] is notable, per A7 speedy rules.  Your thoughts?  You can respond here.  Best.-- +++$+++ Hi.  As you note, it is not clear to me that [[Maulvi Ghulam Rasool]] is notable, per A7 speedy rules.  Your thoughts?  You can respond here.  Best.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 15:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
11492 +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11491 +++$+++ 11491 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.306876980E09 +++$+++ Errm, I'm really not sure how best to deal with this.  As you rightly say in it's current state it appears an A7 candidate but the copyvio material does possibly suggest notability (although even then only barely).  Prodding seems unlikely to be successful given the creator's continued interest so I won't object if you tag it A7 and let an admin make the decision.   +++$+++ :Errm, I'm really not sure how best to deal with this.  As you rightly say in it's current state it appears an A7 candidate but the copyvio material does possibly suggest notability (although even then only barely).  Prodding seems unlikely to be successful given the creator's continued interest so I won't object if you tag it A7 and let an admin make the decision.  [[User:Dpmuk|Dpmuk]] ([[User talk:Dpmuk#top|talk]]) 14:23, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

11493 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-04 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.307219040E09 +++$+++ Hi. Understanding that you're working on your thesis and may not have much time at the moment, would you be interested in clerking? If so, I'd like to get together some copyright admins to talk about it. :) -- +++$+++ Hi. Understanding that you're working on your thesis and may not have much time at the moment, would you be interested in clerking? If so, I'd like to get together some copyright admins to talk about it. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 13:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
11494 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ 11493 +++$+++ 11493 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.308637980E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ACopyright_problems%2FClerks&action=historysubmit&diff=435365114&oldid=435127498 Just FYI]. :) You're certainly much needed in whatever spare time you may have. :D -- +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ACopyright_problems%2FClerks&action=historysubmit&diff=435365114&oldid=435127498 Just FYI]. :) You're certainly much needed in whatever spare time you may have. :D --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 23:33, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

273638 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.173624540E09 +++$+++ Welcome back!  Though I have to admit that I didn't know you disappeared for awhile. =\\  It appears that I'm not very aware of how the alliance is doing.  Hmm...  Anyways, glad you're back and I hope all is going well. =)  On a completely different note... [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/User_conduct&diff=prev&oldid=113997019 oy vey], glad that was closed quickly. --  +++$+++ Welcome back!  Though I have to admit that I didn't know you disappeared for awhile. =\  It appears that I'm not very aware of how the alliance is doing.  Hmm...  Anyways, glad you're back and I hope all is going well. =)  On a completely different note... [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct&diff=prev&oldid=113997019 oy vey], glad that was closed quickly. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 07:49, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
273639 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273638 +++$+++ 273638 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.173696780E09 +++$+++ I'd support a community ban if there was one.  The RfC thing, the vote for a new mentor (uhh, yeah...), the choice of \"sacked\", and the idea of admin coaching (shudder) is just bad.  It's pretty obvious that it is not going anywhere fast, even withstanding the latest excuse.  The mentoring seems to have failed.  It feels like he went through the motions of reading whatever was assigned, but didn't follow through with the editing suggestions.  And with the admin coaching thing, it's obvious that adminship is still his ultimate goal. --  +++$+++ :I'd support a community ban if there was one.  The RfC thing, the vote for a new mentor (uhh, yeah...), the choice of "sacked", and the idea of admin coaching (shudder) is just bad.  It's pretty obvious that it is not going anywhere fast, even withstanding the latest excuse.  The mentoring seems to have failed.  It feels like he went through the motions of reading whatever was assigned, but didn't follow through with the editing suggestions.  And with the admin coaching thing, it's obvious that adminship is still his ultimate goal. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 03:53, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

535784 +++$+++ Eugene van der Pijll +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-16 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.150507680E09 +++$+++ I thought you'd like to know: [[Wikipedia:Wikifun|Wikifun]] Round 13 starts coming Sunday at 21:00 UTC. --  +++$+++ I thought you'd like to know: [[Wikipedia:Wikifun|Wikifun]] Round 13 starts coming Sunday at 21:00 UTC. -- [[User:Eugene van der Pijll|Eugène van der Pijll]] 18:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
535785 +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535784 +++$+++ 535784 +++$+++ 2006-06-16 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.150509540E09 +++$+++ Sunday at 21:00 UTC = 4:00 pm my time  +++$+++ :Sunday at 21:00 UTC = 4:00 pm my time [[User:Amalas|<font color="maroon">Amalas</font>]] [[User talk:Amalas|<font color="maroon">=^_^=</font>]] 18:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

273642 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.173656460E09 +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|43px|left|WikiThanks]] Don't worry, I'm not giving up on the proposal; I'm just going to come up with a better one. You see, your opinion got me thinking; I didn't actually want that proposal to be turned into a newbie-attack weapon (that's not why I suggested it), and you pointed out that that would happen. I want to give you this thank you flower as a gift for your input. I'll tell you when I write the better proposal.  +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|43px|left|WikiThanks]] Don't worry, I'm not giving up on the proposal; I'm just going to come up with a better one. You see, your opinion got me thinking; I didn't actually want that proposal to be turned into a newbie-attack weapon (that's not why I suggested it), and you pointed out that that would happen. I want to give you this thank you flower as a gift for your input. I'll tell you when I write the better proposal. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
273643 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273642 +++$+++ 273642 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.173670380E09 +++$+++ Here is my new proposal: [[User:Acalamari\/IWN]].  +++$+++ :Here is my new proposal: [[User:Acalamari/IWN]]. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

273645 +++$+++ Berks105 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-13 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.173812400E09 +++$+++ Will your not keep reverting me please. An annoymous IP address ([[User:70.53.94.125]]) changed the British date format to the American one (he did this on many articles, including John Cleese, John Inman, Patricia Routledge). As it is Wikipedia policy to have the date format for the country of the person\/programme I reverted his edit. I do not understand why you are reverting me? -- +++$+++ Will your not keep reverting me please. An annoymous IP address ([[User:70.53.94.125]]) changed the British date format to the American one (he did this on many articles, including John Cleese, John Inman, Patricia Routledge). As it is Wikipedia policy to have the date format for the country of the person/programme I reverted his edit. I do not understand why you are reverting me? --[[User:Berks105|Berks105]] 12:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
273646 +++$+++ Berks105 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273645 +++$+++ 273645 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.173812700E09 +++$+++ In the case of this article I was in fact reverting someone who had done just as you say, purely changed the case (in this case to the wrong date format). For you then to revert me is disruptive. I am aware we are not meant to do round purely changing dates and I do not do so, I will change them when I am generally fixing links in an article; and will only change them if it a British based article. -- +++$+++ :In the case of this article I was in fact reverting someone who had done just as you say, purely changed the case (in this case to the wrong date format). For you then to revert me is disruptive. I am aware we are not meant to do round purely changing dates and I do not do so, I will change them when I am generally fixing links in an article; and will only change them if it a British based article. --[[User:Berks105|Berks105]] 12:05, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
273647 +++$+++ Berks105 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273645 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.173813180E09 +++$+++ My preferences are set, I am thinking about the millions of people who don't have accounts and use Wikipedia. If you had read what I said above I do not just change the dates, I only do when I do other things to an article. In the case of ''Keeping Up Appearances'' I was reverting someone who had purely change the dates to the incorrect US format, you should be moaning at that person and telling them to stop. And I think you are the first person to start an edit war with me about this, if you had just let me revert someone else incorrect edits in the first place we would not have had a problem. -- +++$+++ :::My preferences are set, I am thinking about the millions of people who don't have accounts and use Wikipedia. If you had read what I said above I do not just change the dates, I only do when I do other things to an article. In the case of ''Keeping Up Appearances'' I was reverting someone who had purely change the dates to the incorrect US format, you should be moaning at that person and telling them to stop. And I think you are the first person to start an edit war with me about this, if you had just let me revert someone else incorrect edits in the first place we would not have had a problem. --[[User:Berks105|Berks105]] 12:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
273648 +++$+++ Berks105 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273645 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.173814500E09 +++$+++ I apologise if \"NO\" came across as screaming. I was frustated that you kept reverting for no reason, if you had explained your reasoning in the first place instead of \"rv\" maybe it wouldn't have happended. And in fairness to me, there wasn't an edit war before you came along; I reverted one edit, that was the end of story. But, I agree with you one thing, I will move on, there seems little point continuing this. -- +++$+++ ::::I apologise if "NO" came across as screaming. I was frustated that you kept reverting for no reason, if you had explained your reasoning in the first place instead of "rv" maybe it wouldn't have happended. And in fairness to me, there wasn't an edit war before you came along; I reverted one edit, that was the end of story. But, I agree with you one thing, I will move on, there seems little point continuing this. --[[User:Berks105|Berks105]] 12:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

11502 +++$+++ Ginsengbomb +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ 11502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-25 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.256474640E09 +++$+++ You are an Admin, and I am a lowly Rollbacker, so perhaps I shouldn't be sticking my nose in on this, but I happened upon this mini \"controversy\" while signing into Huggle and I'm concerned that this particular anon IP was blocked very hastily and with little regard for what seems to me a very high probability that he felt he was contributing positively. Granted, I know little of the history prior to his initial addition to ANI, which seemed a bit nutty (but arguably no less nutty than the preceding thread) but I can understand why he was upset over having it reverted away without explanation. I also note that he wasn't particularly obnoxious at any point. He even thanked you in his first post to your talk page. Perhaps his \"contributions\" seem less obnoxious to me because I am about to spend an hour or so reverting vandalism and next to guys blanking whole pages or replacing them with \"FART\" repeated 1,000 times, this individual seems less awful. But... regardless, just my opinion. I don't know that he necessarily deserved a block or, if he did, perhaps he deserved more leeway. The only place where he seems to actually go off-track was in how he phrased his protest of the block, but by then it almost seems like he's been driven to frustration and is venting. Just my two cents.  +++$+++ You are an Admin, and I am a lowly Rollbacker, so perhaps I shouldn't be sticking my nose in on this, but I happened upon this mini "controversy" while signing into Huggle and I'm concerned that this particular anon IP was blocked very hastily and with little regard for what seems to me a very high probability that he felt he was contributing positively. Granted, I know little of the history prior to his initial addition to ANI, which seemed a bit nutty (but arguably no less nutty than the preceding thread) but I can understand why he was upset over having it reverted away without explanation. I also note that he wasn't particularly obnoxious at any point. He even thanked you in his first post to your talk page. Perhaps his "contributions" seem less obnoxious to me because I am about to spend an hour or so reverting vandalism and next to guys blanking whole pages or replacing them with "FART" repeated 1,000 times, this individual seems less awful. But... regardless, just my opinion. I don't know that he necessarily deserved a block or, if he did, perhaps he deserved more leeway. The only place where he seems to actually go off-track was in how he phrased his protest of the block, but by then it almost seems like he's been driven to frustration and is venting. Just my two cents. [[User:Ginsengbomb|Ginsengbomb]] ([[User talk:Ginsengbomb|talk]]) 05:44, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
11503 +++$+++ Ginsengbomb +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ 11502 +++$+++ 11502 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.256474820E09 +++$+++ Granted, his initial \"thanks\" to you was also a personal attack on someone else. Just in looking through his contributions the anon just seems far more -misguided- than -willfully disruptive-.  +++$+++ :Granted, his initial "thanks" to you was also a personal attack on someone else. Just in looking through his contributions the anon just seems far more -misguided- than -willfully disruptive-. [[User:Ginsengbomb|Ginsengbomb]] ([[User talk:Ginsengbomb|talk]]) 05:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
11504 +++$+++ 122.57.91.165 +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ 11502 +++$+++ 11503 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.256475240E09 +++$+++ And also, to be fair, you '''were an involved admin''' so it would've been better to have let a different admin handle the matter. Granted, the unblock request wasn't great but you weres till involved and therefore shouldn't have removed the unblock notice however \"disruptive\" you thought it was.--[[Special:Contributions\/122.57.91.165|122.57.91.165]] ( +++$+++ ::And also, to be fair, you '''were an involved admin''' so it would've been better to have let a different admin handle the matter. Granted, the unblock request wasn't great but you weres till involved and therefore shouldn't have removed the unblock notice however "disruptive" you thought it was.--[[Special:Contributions/122.57.91.165|122.57.91.165]] ([[User talk:122.57.91.165|talk]]) 05:54, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
11505 +++$+++ 122.57.91.165 +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ 11502 +++$+++ 11503 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.256475600E09 +++$+++ And even if you hand't been involved, a \"please consider a more polite unblock request\" would've done far more good than a blatant removal of the unblock request and a \"If you continue like this, your talk page will be locked\". As the saying goes, do you as you want others to do. If you want others to be polite, be polite yourself.--[[Special:Contributions\/122.57.91.165|122.57.91.165]] ( +++$+++ ::And even if you hand't been involved, a "please consider a more polite unblock request" would've done far more good than a blatant removal of the unblock request and a "If you continue like this, your talk page will be locked". As the saying goes, do you as you want others to do. If you want others to be polite, be polite yourself.--[[Special:Contributions/122.57.91.165|122.57.91.165]] ([[User talk:122.57.91.165|talk]]) 06:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
11506 +++$+++ 122.57.91.165 +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ 11502 +++$+++ 11503 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.256476380E09 +++$+++ Agree with Ginsengbomb, about IP probably being more misguided than intentionally disruptive. Seriously, the block was a bad idea. i also seriously disagree with your decision to give him a level 4 personal attacks warning\/ Yes, he did make a personal attack but it would have been better to alert him to the [[WP:NPA]] policy first or at least give him a lower warning than level 4. [[WP:AGF]] and always assume that although some IPs such as myself know a lot about Wikipedia policies and guidleines many other Ip editors will not be as knowledgable and it seems rather weighty to slam a templated \"only warning\" message onto an editor who probably was misguided. --[[Special:Contributions\/122.57.91.165|122.57.91.165]] ( +++$+++ ::Agree with Ginsengbomb, about IP probably being more misguided than intentionally disruptive. Seriously, the block was a bad idea. i also seriously disagree with your decision to give him a level 4 personal attacks warning/ Yes, he did make a personal attack but it would have been better to alert him to the [[WP:NPA]] policy first or at least give him a lower warning than level 4. [[WP:AGF]] and always assume that although some IPs such as myself know a lot about Wikipedia policies and guidleines many other Ip editors will not be as knowledgable and it seems rather weighty to slam a templated "only warning" message onto an editor who probably was misguided. --[[Special:Contributions/122.57.91.165|122.57.91.165]] ([[User talk:122.57.91.165|talk]]) 06:13, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

569896 +++$+++ Leben2 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569896 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-13 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.179103020E09 +++$+++ Please: a justification or solution.  +++$+++ Please: a justification or solution. [[User:Leben2|Leben2]] 17:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
569897 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569896 +++$+++ 569896 +++$+++ 2007-05-13 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.179104040E09 +++$+++ Just because an article can be created doesn't mean that it should be.  The policies and guidelines dictate what is and is not appropriate for inclusion.  Researching notable topics and subjects that are either not represented or require substantial improvement is one of the key areas of participation for contributors such as yourself.  I hope that you continue to do so and enjoy your time here.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Just because an article can be created doesn't mean that it should be.  The policies and guidelines dictate what is and is not appropriate for inclusion.  Researching notable topics and subjects that are either not represented or require substantial improvement is one of the key areas of participation for contributors such as yourself.  I hope that you continue to do so and enjoy your time here.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 17:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

535796 +++$+++ Gingerjoos +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535796 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.152309480E09 +++$+++ I was stub-sorting [[Dan Negru]] and there was an edit-conflict. :-) I cancelled my edit. Is that what we are supposed to do? Or are there other options? For academic interest, is <nowiki>{{tv-bio-stub}}<\/nowiki> another possible stub choice for this article? -- +++$+++ I was stub-sorting [[Dan Negru]] and there was an edit-conflict. :-) I cancelled my edit. Is that what we are supposed to do? Or are there other options? For academic interest, is <nowiki>{{tv-bio-stub}}</nowiki> another possible stub choice for this article? --[[User:Gingerjoos|anirudh]] 14:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
535797 +++$+++ Gingerjoos +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535796 +++$+++ 535796 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.152310380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your advice! :-) you did not explain too much. I would rather someone(myself included) \"err on the side of more detail rather than less\" as you said. and...why is a double stub frowned upon? Doesn't it allow more people to notice it? So wouldn't it actually be better? Sorry if this sounds like a stupid question. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for your advice! :-) you did not explain too much. I would rather someone(myself included) "err on the side of more detail rather than less" as you said. and...why is a double stub frowned upon? Doesn't it allow more people to notice it? So wouldn't it actually be better? Sorry if this sounds like a stupid question. --[[User:Gingerjoos|anirudh]] 15:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
535798 +++$+++ Gingerjoos +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535796 +++$+++ 535797 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.152311160E09 +++$+++ Thanks! So I guess I will take that as a convention. :-) -- +++$+++ ::Thanks! So I guess I will take that as a convention. :-) --[[User:Gingerjoos|anirudh]] 15:26, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

264062 +++$+++ Ulmus procera +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.175819040E09 +++$+++ Are we then to await the availability of Advanced York Notes as a sign of notability? In my opinion this is a trivial piece of information, probably fit for a footnote. But I suppose this is the sort of information which is practical. Shame.  +++$+++ Are we then to await the availability of Advanced York Notes as a sign of notability? In my opinion this is a trivial piece of information, probably fit for a footnote. But I suppose this is the sort of information which is practical. Shame. [[User:Ulmus procera|Mornington]] 17:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
264063 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264062 +++$+++ 264062 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.176169740E09 +++$+++ There is an option on the left hand menu, but I would seriously advise spending time getting to grips with Wikipedia's culture before attempting something like that.  +++$+++ :There is an option on the left hand menu, but I would seriously advise spending time getting to grips with Wikipedia's culture before attempting something like that. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

11510 +++$+++ Manticore +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ 11510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-14 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.258236480E09 +++$+++ Thanks, \u2014 <span style=\"font-family:verdana;font-variant:small-caps;font-weight:bold\"> +++$+++ Thanks, — <span style="font-family:verdana;font-variant:small-caps;font-weight:bold">[[User:Manticore|<span style="color:black">Manti</span>]][[User talk:Manticore|<span style="color:black">core</span>]]</span> 14:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
11511 +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ 11510 +++$+++ 11510 +++$+++ 2009-11-17 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.258446600E09 +++$+++ I'll keep it eye on the situation, but will stay out of the discussion(s) since it could be interpreted as me going against him since I've had experience with him in the past.  I'll be monitoring his reverting, though.  He might be headed to another block if he continues to revert like he has been.  +++$+++ :I'll keep it eye on the situation, but will stay out of the discussion(s) since it could be interpreted as me going against him since I've had experience with him in the past.  I'll be monitoring his reverting, though.  He might be headed to another block if he continues to revert like he has been. [[User:Either way|either way]] ([[User talk:Either way#top|talk]]) 00:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

535799 +++$+++ Crockspot +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535799 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.152322500E09 +++$+++ n00b question here, at what point does an article no longer qualify as a stub, and the stub tag can be removed? I created the [[Andre Lucas]] article today, and I think it might be at the point where it is no longer a stub.  +++$+++ n00b question here, at what point does an article no longer qualify as a stub, and the stub tag can be removed? I created the [[Andre Lucas]] article today, and I think it might be at the point where it is no longer a stub. [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 18:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
535800 +++$+++ Crockspot +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535799 +++$+++ 535799 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.152324960E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the reply. I'll leave it as a stub. There are a lot of men who served with\/under him who could\/would add things.  +++$+++ : Thank you for the reply. I'll leave it as a stub. There are a lot of men who served with/under him who could/would add things. [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] 19:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

535801 +++$+++ Peter S. +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-08 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.152398880E09 +++$+++ Hi, about your change here: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Montage_%28filming%29&diff=62183053&oldid=62183013]. I agree that the article \"montage\" is about the film making process, that it is not a film by itself. However, I don't think that a) the tag \"filming\" properly describes the topic \"film making\" because it only refers to shooting film, and b) I think that the topic of film is a reasonable closed one that we don't need two extensions to refer to it. You did similar edits to \"scene\", \"Sequence\", \"Shot\", \"Wrap party\" etc. Do you mind if I change those edits back?  +++$+++ Hi, about your change here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Montage_%28filming%29&diff=62183053&oldid=62183013]. I agree that the article "montage" is about the film making process, that it is not a film by itself. However, I don't think that a) the tag "filming" properly describes the topic "film making" because it only refers to shooting film, and b) I think that the topic of film is a reasonable closed one that we don't need two extensions to refer to it. You did similar edits to "scene", "Sequence", "Shot", "Wrap party" etc. Do you mind if I change those edits back? [[User:Peter S.|Peter S.]] 15:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
535802 +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535801 +++$+++ 535801 +++$+++ 2006-07-08 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.152417240E09 +++$+++ I think we are in agreement that those things are not a film, and probably shouldn't be marked as such.  I'm a [[WP:WSS|stub-sorter]], and {tl|film-stub}} is much different than {{tl|filming-stub}}, so I thought that the articles should match that.  At the time, it seemed like a good idea.  However, you do have a good point about having two different extensions for essentially the same topic.  I don't think I would have a huge problem with you changing them back. However, I've already changed all the articles that linked to them to use 'filming', so you'll have to change them all back.  Thanks for letting me know about this, and I think that your reasoning is valid.  Have a great day and happy editing!  +++$+++ :I think we are in agreement that those things are not a film, and probably shouldn't be marked as such.  I'm a [[WP:WSS|stub-sorter]], and {tl|film-stub}} is much different than {{tl|filming-stub}}, so I thought that the articles should match that.  At the time, it seemed like a good idea.  However, you do have a good point about having two different extensions for essentially the same topic.  I don't think I would have a huge problem with you changing them back. However, I've already changed all the articles that linked to them to use 'filming', so you'll have to change them all back.  Thanks for letting me know about this, and I think that your reasoning is valid.  Have a great day and happy editing! [[User:Amalas|<font color="maroon"><b>~ Amalas</b></font>]] [[User talk:Amalas|<font color="navy">rawr<sup>=^_^=</sup></font>]] 20:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
535803 +++$+++ Peter S. +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535801 +++$+++ 535802 +++$+++ 2006-07-08 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.152418440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your nice reply! I will change the ones back that I can find and have time for :-) Did you use a tool to automatically change all them or did you do it manually? Cheers!  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your nice reply! I will change the ones back that I can find and have time for :-) Did you use a tool to automatically change all them or did you do it manually? Cheers! [[User:Peter S.|Peter S.]] 21:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
535804 +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535801 +++$+++ 535801 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.152431100E09 +++$+++ I changed them manually by going to the \"What links here\" link.  There's actually not as many of them as I thought, so it shouldn't be ''too'' bad.   +++$+++ :I changed them manually by going to the "What links here" link.  There's actually not as many of them as I thought, so it shouldn't be ''too'' bad.  [[User:Amalas|<font color="maroon"><b>~ Amalas</b></font>]] [[User talk:Amalas|<font color="navy">rawr]] [[Special:Contributions/Amalas|<sup>=^_^=</sup></font>]] 00:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
535805 +++$+++ Peter S. +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535801 +++$+++ 535804 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.152432360E09 +++$+++ Ok, I changed them back. The borders between \"film\" (as a viewer or knowledgable film geek) and \"filming\" (as a creator or part of the movie industry) are quickly disappearing. Example [[Night-for-night]] - something film geeks know about, but also something film creators care about. I would suggest merging the two. Just my 2 cents, though, I'm no stub-sorter. Thank your for your help! :-)  +++$+++ ::Ok, I changed them back. The borders between "film" (as a viewer or knowledgable film geek) and "filming" (as a creator or part of the movie industry) are quickly disappearing. Example [[Night-for-night]] - something film geeks know about, but also something film creators care about. I would suggest merging the two. Just my 2 cents, though, I'm no stub-sorter. Thank your for your help! :-) [[User:Peter S.|Peter S.]] 01:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

11517 +++$+++ TCNSV +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ 11517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-28 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.282994760E09 +++$+++ Hello, Either way. I wanted to know why you considered [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Fetchcomms\/Miscellany&diff=prev&oldid=381410639 my edit] \"unnecessary\" since I was merely trying to abide by this rule: [[Wikipedia:UP#Simulation_and_disruption_of_the_MediaWiki_interface]] and attempt to stop the fakeness on Fetchcomms page; it doesn't look like he will need it anyway. [[User:TeleComNasSprVen|<font color=\"red\">:| TelCo<\/font>]][[User talk:TCNSV|<font color=\"green\">NaSp<\/font>]] +++$+++ Hello, Either way. I wanted to know why you considered [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fetchcomms/Miscellany&diff=prev&oldid=381410639 my edit] "unnecessary" since I was merely trying to abide by this rule: [[Wikipedia:UP#Simulation_and_disruption_of_the_MediaWiki_interface]] and attempt to stop the fakeness on Fetchcomms page; it doesn't look like he will need it anyway. [[User:TeleComNasSprVen|<font color="red">:| TelCo</font>]][[User talk:TCNSV|<font color="green">NaSp</font>]][[User:TCNSV/PMD|<font face="Showcard Gothic" color="blue">Ve :|</font>]] 04:26, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
11518 +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ 11517 +++$+++ 11517 +++$+++ 2010-08-28 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.283027520E09 +++$+++ Then talk to him about it.  Don't go into his personal space and edit it as you see fit based on a guideline that \"strongly discourages\" it.  It does not say \"you may never, ever do this because it is policy\" it says \"we really would prefer it if you didn't.\"  Again, talk to him rather than doing that to his space.   +++$+++ :Then talk to him about it.  Don't go into his personal space and edit it as you see fit based on a guideline that "strongly discourages" it.  It does not say "you may never, ever do this because it is policy" it says "we really would prefer it if you didn't."  Again, talk to him rather than doing that to his space.  [[User:Either way|either way]] ([[User talk:Either way#top|talk]]) 13:32, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
11519 +++$+++ TCNSV +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ 11517 +++$+++ 11518 +++$+++ 2010-08-28 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.283037600E09 +++$+++ Thanks. [[User:TeleComNasSprVen|<font color=\"red\">:| TelCo<\/font>]][[User talk:TCNSV|<font color=\"green\">NaSp<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::Thanks. [[User:TeleComNasSprVen|<font color="red">:| TelCo</font>]][[User talk:TCNSV|<font color="green">NaSp</font>]][[User:TCNSV/PMD|<font face="Showcard Gothic" color="blue">Ve :|</font>]] 16:20, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

273662 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273662 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-26 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.174952160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help. Now I have to deal with the ten or twenty other (mainly anon) editors doing much the same sort of thing to similar articles...  Still, it'll be a relief at least to have a breathing space from Charoog10. -- +++$+++ Thanks for your help. Now I have to deal with the ten or twenty other (mainly anon) editors doing much the same sort of thing to similar articles...  Still, it'll be a relief at least to have a breathing space from Charoog10. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]) 16:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
273663 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273662 +++$+++ 273662 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.174963980E09 +++$+++ I hadn't seen that I think; I thought that they didn't get sullen and unco-operative until their teens? An early developer, perhaps. -- +++$+++ :I hadn't seen that I think; I thought that they didn't get sullen and unco-operative until their teens? An early developer, perhaps. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]) 19:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

11522 +++$+++ Cgingold +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11522 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-11 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.184188200E09 +++$+++ Hi! I see you've recently created a stub article for [[Clete Roberts]] -- and even included the VietnamCorr template. I added his name to the template a few months back, in hopes of eventually getting around to starting an article. So it's great that you got it started! I'd love to know how it is that you came to do a piece on Clete Roberts, at all. I presume you must have seen him on KNXT, way back when... or perhaps on MASH?? Regards,  +++$+++ Hi! I see you've recently created a stub article for [[Clete Roberts]] -- and even included the VietnamCorr template. I added his name to the template a few months back, in hopes of eventually getting around to starting an article. So it's great that you got it started! I'd love to know how it is that you came to do a piece on Clete Roberts, at all. I presume you must have seen him on KNXT, way back when... or perhaps on MASH?? Regards, [[User:Cgingold|Cgingold]] 14:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
11523 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11522 +++$+++ 11522 +++$+++ 2008-06-06 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.212810000E09 +++$+++ Yes, thanks. I knew Roberts from ''M*A*S*H'', and was always curious about him. So I did some research and created his entry. Best,  +++$+++ :Yes, thanks. I knew Roberts from ''M*A*S*H'', and was always curious about him. So I did some research and created his entry. Best, [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 20:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

11524 +++$+++ KnowledgeOfSelf +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11524 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-12 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.197514500E09 +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Shooting War (comics)|, as you did to [[:Shooting War (comics)]]}}. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 -->  +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Shooting War (comics)|, as you did to [[:Shooting War (comics)]]}}. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:KnowledgeOfSelf|<font color="#151B8D">Knowledge</font><font color="#6D7B8D">Of</font><font color="#461B7E">Self</font>]] | [[User talk:KnowledgeOfSelf|<font color="#461B7E">talk</font>]] 18:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
11525 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11524 +++$+++ 11524 +++$+++ 2008-06-06 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.212810000E09 +++$+++ Actually, I wasn't trying to vandalize the Shooting War entry as much as combine two redundant entries, [[Shooting War]] and Shooting War (comics).  +++$+++ :Actually, I wasn't trying to vandalize the Shooting War entry as much as combine two redundant entries, [[Shooting War]] and Shooting War (comics). [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 20:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

11526 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-25 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.211740320E09 +++$+++ Excellent edits! My highest compliments on how you contextualized the additions and how clearly, simply and straightforwardly you wrote! -- +++$+++ Excellent edits! My highest compliments on how you contextualized the additions and how clearly, simply and straightforwardly you wrote! --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 11:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
11527 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11526 +++$+++ 11526 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.212318240E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Appreciate that  +++$+++ :Thanks! Appreciate that [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 04:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

11528 +++$+++ Hamster Sandwich +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-20 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.214001300E09 +++$+++ Hiya! Nice new article there, but I did want to point out that the original name of the band was \"Full Tillt Boogie\", with two L's, this, a play on the spelling of John Till's name. After Janis was convinced that ditching the \"squares\" from Kozmic Blues Band was the way to go, the hiring the remainder of John's band would provide her with the powerhouse boogie outfit she needed to back her. All those Canadian boys had gone down to N.Y.C. years earlier from their Stratford-Woodstock, Ontario, home towns. Regards,  +++$+++ Hiya! Nice new article there, but I did want to point out that the original name of the band was "Full Tillt Boogie", with two L's, this, a play on the spelling of John Till's name. After Janis was convinced that ditching the "squares" from Kozmic Blues Band was the way to go, the hiring the remainder of John's band would provide her with the powerhouse boogie outfit she needed to back her. All those Canadian boys had gone down to N.Y.C. years earlier from their Stratford-Woodstock, Ontario, home towns. Regards, [[User:Hamster Sandwich|Hamster Sandwich]] ([[User talk:Hamster Sandwich|talk]]) 15:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
11529 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11528 +++$+++ 11528 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.214020080E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I appreciate the corrections. I'll definitely note all that, unless you want to go ahead and do it?  +++$+++ :Thanks, I appreciate the corrections. I'll definitely note all that, unless you want to go ahead and do it? [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 20:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
11530 +++$+++ W guice +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11528 +++$+++ 11528 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.215894000E09 +++$+++ Cheers for this article, really interesting topic i had no knowledge of. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ * Cheers for this article, really interesting topic i had no knowledge of. Cheers, '''[[User:W guice|<font face="arial" color="#bb0000">tomasz.</font>]]''' 13:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
11531 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11528 +++$+++ 11528 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.215896520E09 +++$+++ Thanks, it was fun researching it, because I didn't know about them before either!  +++$+++ :Thanks, it was fun researching it, because I didn't know about them before either! [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 14:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

273673 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-29 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.175218440E09 +++$+++ I was never offended by your oppose, Sarah, and if I had been, that would have meant I was a biased user. I just said on Ryan's talk page that it was the longest oppose I'd ever seen before. :) As I mentioned above on your talk page, it was highly convincing. In fact, my RfA was even more \"unique\" (if that's an appropriate word to use) in the fact that it had three very long opposes. I've never seen that before. As for Rleve's oppose, (to me) you didn't seem impressed by it; but maybe I interpreted you incorrectly. Sorry about that. :)  +++$+++ I was never offended by your oppose, Sarah, and if I had been, that would have meant I was a biased user. I just said on Ryan's talk page that it was the longest oppose I'd ever seen before. :) As I mentioned above on your talk page, it was highly convincing. In fact, my RfA was even more "unique" (if that's an appropriate word to use) in the fact that it had three very long opposes. I've never seen that before. As for Rleve's oppose, (to me) you didn't seem impressed by it; but maybe I interpreted you incorrectly. Sorry about that. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
273674 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273673 +++$+++ 273673 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.175305380E09 +++$+++ You did great on your own RfA: [[WP:100]]! As for the age criteria, I disagree with it; not because of my age, but because it would mean de-sysopping a load of good admins, like Persian Poet Gal and Majorly; who have done a great job as administrators. Having their administrative tools removed simply because they are not old enough would be a huge loss.  +++$+++ :You did great on your own RfA: [[WP:100]]! As for the age criteria, I disagree with it; not because of my age, but because it would mean de-sysopping a load of good admins, like Persian Poet Gal and Majorly; who have done a great job as administrators. Having their administrative tools removed simply because they are not old enough would be a huge loss. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:43, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

273675 +++$+++ Anetode +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-30 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.175262120E09 +++$+++ Not at all, I think that your assessment of the situation at [[WP:RPP]] was perfectly appropriate (and probably more level-headed and impersonal than my initial action). It's not a big deal, if Qxz is no longer editing then there shouldn't even be an issue with the talk page. Thanks for the note \u02c9\u02c9<sup> +++$+++ Not at all, I think that your assessment of the situation at [[WP:RPP]] was perfectly appropriate (and probably more level-headed and impersonal than my initial action). It's not a big deal, if Qxz is no longer editing then there shouldn't even be an issue with the talk page. Thanks for the note ˉˉ<sup>[[User:Anetode|'''anetode''']]</sup>[[User_talk:Anetode|╦╩]] 06:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
273676 +++$+++ Daniel.Bryant +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273675 +++$+++ 273675 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.175282520E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Sarah&oldid=119018376#RfA_thanks :)] ''' +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sarah&oldid=119018376#RfA_thanks :)] '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel&nbsp;Bryant</span>]]''' 12:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

11532 +++$+++ Ntnon +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11532 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-17 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.216288740E09 +++$+++ Just noticed that in addition to your copious work on letters columns that you've also done a considerable amount of work on [[Jerry Bails]] - which I was in the process of doing also! So, to make sure we don't step on each others' toes, should I ask whether you know what you'll be tackling ''next''..?! I think I've still got a considerable amount more to add into the article on Mr Bails in a short while, but I'm writing it off-line to avoid multiple edits. Similarly, I'm putting together an article on Comics fandom itself and Comics fanzines. If you'd like to attempt a collaberation on any of these - or other - pages (maybe you have access to sources I don't, or vice versa), let me know. :o)  +++$+++ Just noticed that in addition to your copious work on letters columns that you've also done a considerable amount of work on [[Jerry Bails]] - which I was in the process of doing also! So, to make sure we don't step on each others' toes, should I ask whether you know what you'll be tackling ''next''..?! I think I've still got a considerable amount more to add into the article on Mr Bails in a short while, but I'm writing it off-line to avoid multiple edits. Similarly, I'm putting together an article on Comics fandom itself and Comics fanzines. If you'd like to attempt a collaberation on any of these - or other - pages (maybe you have access to sources I don't, or vice versa), let me know. :o) [[User:Ntnon|ntnon]] ([[User talk:Ntnon|talk]]) 02:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
11533 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11532 +++$+++ 11532 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.216289100E09 +++$+++ Hey [[User:Ntnon|ntnon]]. No, I've exhausted my knowledge\/research about [[Jerry Bails]], and welcome your additions to his entry. Ditto for comics fandom\/fanzines. I look forward to reading more with what you do with those topics. Cheers!  +++$+++ :Hey [[User:Ntnon|ntnon]]. No, I've exhausted my knowledge/research about [[Jerry Bails]], and welcome your additions to his entry. Ditto for comics fandom/fanzines. I look forward to reading more with what you do with those topics. Cheers! [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 03:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
11534 +++$+++ Ntnon +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11532 +++$+++ 11533 +++$+++ 2008-07-18 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.216365360E09 +++$+++ Well, I've significantly added to (and hopefully \"improved\") '[[Jerry Bails]]' now, so sooner or later I'll get round to filling in a lot of the now-extant red links there. GB Love I've pretty-much covered, and need to tidy; RBCC deserves something worthwhile, and 'fandom and 'fanzines are in the process also. Among other things...  +++$+++ ::Well, I've significantly added to (and hopefully "improved") '[[Jerry Bails]]' now, so sooner or later I'll get round to filling in a lot of the now-extant red links there. GB Love I've pretty-much covered, and need to tidy; RBCC deserves something worthwhile, and 'fandom and 'fanzines are in the process also. Among other things... [[User:Ntnon|ntnon]] ([[User talk:Ntnon|talk]]) 00:16, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
11535 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11532 +++$+++ 11534 +++$+++ 2008-07-18 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.216372200E09 +++$+++ P.S. I also used some of the information you included here to augment the pre-existing [[Alter Ego (fanzine)]] and [[Alley Award]] entries. Great work!  +++$+++ :::P.S. I also used some of the information you included here to augment the pre-existing [[Alter Ego (fanzine)]] and [[Alley Award]] entries. Great work! [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 02:10, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
11536 +++$+++ Ntnon +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11532 +++$+++ 11535 +++$+++ 2008-07-18 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.216375680E09 +++$+++ I did think that ''Alter Ego'' and ''Alley Award'' needed cross-updating, so thanks for doing that. :o)  +++$+++ ::::I did think that ''Alter Ego'' and ''Alley Award'' needed cross-updating, so thanks for doing that. :o) [[User:Ntnon|ntnon]] ([[User talk:Ntnon|talk]]) 03:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

273679 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-01 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.175474340E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA. -- +++$+++ Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA. --[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 17:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
273680 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273679 +++$+++ 273679 +++$+++ 2007-04-02 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.175545140E09 +++$+++ Thank you; I may well come to you for advice, ar least while I am getting my feet under the table.-- +++$+++ :Thank you; I may well come to you for advice, ar least while I am getting my feet under the table.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 13:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

11537 +++$+++ Paul A +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-17 06:48:00 +++$+++ 1.216302480E09 +++$+++ Just a reminder that the DEFAULTSORT keyword uses a colon, not a pipe link: <code><nowiki>{{DEFAULTSORT:Consiglio, Tony}}<\/nowiki><\/code>, not <code><nowiki>{{DEFAULTSORT|Consiglio, Tony}}<\/nowiki><\/code>. \u2014 +++$+++ Just a reminder that the DEFAULTSORT keyword uses a colon, not a pipe link: <code><nowiki>{{DEFAULTSORT:Consiglio, Tony}}</nowiki></code>, not <code><nowiki>{{DEFAULTSORT|Consiglio, Tony}}</nowiki></code>. —[[User:Paul A|Paul A]] ([[User talk:Paul A|talk]]) 06:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
11538 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11537 +++$+++ 11537 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.216333980E09 +++$+++ Whoops! Thanks for the reminder\/correction  +++$+++ :Whoops! Thanks for the reminder/correction [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 15:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

11539 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11539 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-28 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.217289120E09 +++$+++ Nice work.  :)  Got anything for [[Mike Vosburg]] or [[David Anthony Kraft]]?  +++$+++ Nice work.  :)  Got anything for [[Mike Vosburg]] or [[David Anthony Kraft]]? [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 16:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
11540 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11539 +++$+++ 11539 +++$+++ 2008-07-28 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.217295780E09 +++$+++ Thanks! How's this for [[Mike Vosburg|Vosburg]]? I'll get to Kraft when I have some more free time.  +++$+++ : Thanks! How's this for [[Mike Vosburg|Vosburg]]? I'll get to Kraft when I have some more free time. [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 18:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
11541 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11539 +++$+++ 11540 +++$+++ 2008-07-28 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.217298300E09 +++$+++ Good deal! Just keep [[WP:BLP]] in mind, and you'll be just fine.  You might want to coordinate with [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] at some point, as I see you've been working on comics creators, and he has done a fair amount of work with them as well.  If I can think of any other stubs that need work, I'll let you know.  :)  +++$+++ ::Good deal! Just keep [[WP:BLP]] in mind, and you'll be just fine.  You might want to coordinate with [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] at some point, as I see you've been working on comics creators, and he has done a fair amount of work with them as well.  If I can think of any other stubs that need work, I'll let you know.  :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 19:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
11542 +++$+++ Ntnon +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11539 +++$+++ 11541 +++$+++ 2008-07-28 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.217304000E09 +++$+++ David Anthony Kraft's ''Comics Interview'' is a vitally important publication for a whole number of creator interviews, so that needs considerable mention on his page.  +++$+++ :::David Anthony Kraft's ''Comics Interview'' is a vitally important publication for a whole number of creator interviews, so that needs considerable mention on his page. [[User:Ntnon|ntnon]] ([[User talk:Ntnon|talk]]) 21:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
11543 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11539 +++$+++ 11542 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.219110660E09 +++$+++ Finally added some more material to the [[David Anthony Kraft|DAK]] entry. Seems to me that to really do ''Comics Interview'' justice, it needs its own entry. (Possibly same thing for his imprint Fictioneer Books...)  +++$+++ :::: Finally added some more material to the [[David Anthony Kraft|DAK]] entry. Seems to me that to really do ''Comics Interview'' justice, it needs its own entry. (Possibly same thing for his imprint Fictioneer Books...) [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 18:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
11544 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11539 +++$+++ 11543 +++$+++ 2008-08-19 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.219171560E09 +++$+++ Mucho awesome, thanks! :)  +++$+++ :::::Mucho awesome, thanks! :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 11:46, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
11545 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11539 +++$+++ 11539 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.219471140E09 +++$+++ OK, I threatened to find some more stubs that you could work on.  ;)  If you like, you could try [[Art Thibert]], [[Bob Budiansky]], [[Bob McLeod (comics)]], [[Brian Augustyn]]... those are just a few names I recognize off the first 200 of the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Stub-Class_Comics_creators_articles Stub-Class Comics creators articles] category.  :)  +++$+++ :OK, I threatened to find some more stubs that you could work on.  ;)  If you like, you could try [[Art Thibert]], [[Bob Budiansky]], [[Bob McLeod (comics)]], [[Brian Augustyn]]... those are just a few names I recognize off the first 200 of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Stub-Class_Comics_creators_articles Stub-Class Comics creators articles] category.  :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 22:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
11546 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11539 +++$+++ 11545 +++$+++ 2008-09-02 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.220361180E09 +++$+++ Okay, I expanded Thibert's entry, Budiansky and McLeod seem pretty good to me; I doubt there's much I could add. (Maybe they no longer really qualify as stubs?) I'll try to tackle Augustyn next \u2014  +++$+++ :: Okay, I expanded Thibert's entry, Budiansky and McLeod seem pretty good to me; I doubt there's much I could add. (Maybe they no longer really qualify as stubs?) I'll try to tackle Augustyn next — [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 06:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
11547 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11539 +++$+++ 11546 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.221179400E09 +++$+++ [[Brian Augustyn|Augustyn]] done \u2014  +++$+++ ::: [[Brian Augustyn|Augustyn]] done — [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 17:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

569902 +++$+++ Seattle Skier +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-15 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.179282360E09 +++$+++ Hi aeropagitica, thanks for your support in [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Seattle Skier|my RfA]], which passed unopposed.  Please let me know if I can be of any assistance. -- +++$+++ Hi aeropagitica, thanks for your support in [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Seattle Skier|my RfA]], which passed unopposed.  Please let me know if I can be of any assistance. --[[User:Seattle Skier|Seattle Skier]] <font size="-2">[[User talk:Seattle Skier|(talk)]]</font> 19:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
569903 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569902 +++$+++ 569902 +++$+++ 2007-05-15 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.179291000E09 +++$+++ Please don't place comments at random places on my Talk page; new discussions are placed at the bottom of the page.  Also, please do not spam me with comments, as you cause edit conflicts when I attempt to respond.  I will put the text of your contribution in to  +++$+++ :Please don't place comments at random places on my Talk page; new discussions are placed at the bottom of the page.  Also, please do not spam me with comments, as you cause edit conflicts when I attempt to respond.  I will put the text of your contribution in to [[User:Stewade/sandbox]] for a few minutes so that you can take a copy on to your computer before I delete it again.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
569904 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569902 +++$+++ 569902 +++$+++ 2007-05-15 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.179294600E09 +++$+++ Hello!  Firstly, please add new comments to the bottom of my Talk page - scattering them randomly about the previous conversations makes it difficult to find and keep track of them.  Secondly, please sign your Talk page comments with four tildes, <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki> in order to make it easier to communicate with you.  Thirdly, please give a link to the article that was deleted.  I work through a lot of articles when I'm on shift, so a link to the title is vital for context.  I can't help if I don't know what you are talking about!  Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello!  Firstly, please add new comments to the bottom of my Talk page - scattering them randomly about the previous conversations makes it difficult to find and keep track of them.  Secondly, please sign your Talk page comments with four tildes, <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> in order to make it easier to communicate with you.  Thirdly, please give a link to the article that was deleted.  I work through a lot of articles when I'm on shift, so a link to the title is vital for context.  I can't help if I don't know what you are talking about!  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

535830 +++$+++ Stumason +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535830 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-04 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.154727780E09 +++$+++ Hi, just a quick note to say that there is a <nowiki>{{NI-stub}}<\/nowiki> as well as an <nowiki>{{Ireland-stub}}<\/nowiki>. Cheers.  +++$+++ Hi, just a quick note to say that there is a <nowiki>{{NI-stub}}</nowiki> as well as an <nowiki>{{Ireland-stub}}</nowiki>. Cheers. [[User:Stumason|<font color = "green">'''Stu'''</font>]] [[User talk:Stumason|<font color = "green"><sup>''’Bout ye!''</sup></font>]] 14:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
535831 +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535830 +++$+++ 535830 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.154728020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reminder.  I don't always remember the more specific stubs (like say, all the counties in England), so I often just go with the higher-level one that I do remember.  I'll try to look more closely next time.  Have a great day and happy editing!  +++$+++ *Thanks for the reminder.  I don't always remember the more specific stubs (like say, all the counties in England), so I often just go with the higher-level one that I do remember.  I'll try to look more closely next time.  Have a great day and happy editing! [[User:Amalas|<font color="maroon"><b>~ Amalas</b></font>]] [[User talk:Amalas|<font color="navy">rawr]] [[Special:Contributions/Amalas|<sup>=^_^=</sup></font>]] 14:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
535832 +++$+++ Stumason +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535830 +++$+++ 535831 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.154730540E09 +++$+++ Just looked at your contributions and noticed the gazillion articles you have stub sorted. Ignore my petty comments above, good job!  +++$+++ **Just looked at your contributions and noticed the gazillion articles you have stub sorted. Ignore my petty comments above, good job! [[User:Stumason|<font color = "green">'''Stu'''</font>]] [[User talk:Stumason|<font color = "green"><sup>''’Bout ye!''</sup></font>]] 15:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

273689 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.175785020E09 +++$+++ Greetings Sarah, having caught sight of the message you've just left for this user you should be aware that much of his editing is very problematic as it incessantly consists an [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User%3ADavidYork71&diff=113287277&oldid=112278303 anti-Islam\/Muslim] SOAPboxing reliant upon his own original research. As well he created an article entitled [[autosodomy]] that was entirely original research and proceeded to inappropriately link it to [[Yoga]] related articles (witness his latest similarly themed edits). The time is drawing near (if it hasn't already arrived) that this editor should be community banned due to his continue problematic editing on the project. Thanks for taking the initiative to curtail this users disruptive behavior. {{User:Netscott\/s1.js}} 07:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ Greetings Sarah, having caught sight of the message you've just left for this user you should be aware that much of his editing is very problematic as it incessantly consists an [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ADavidYork71&diff=113287277&oldid=112278303 anti-Islam/Muslim] SOAPboxing reliant upon his own original research. As well he created an article entitled [[autosodomy]] that was entirely original research and proceeded to inappropriately link it to [[Yoga]] related articles (witness his latest similarly themed edits). The time is drawing near (if it hasn't already arrived) that this editor should be community banned due to his continue problematic editing on the project. Thanks for taking the initiative to curtail this users disruptive behavior. {{User:Netscott/s1.js}} 07:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
273690 +++$+++ Arrow740 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 08:48:00 +++$+++ 1.175788080E09 +++$+++ Please give specific reasons for your block of this user on his talk page. Thank you.  +++$+++ :Please give specific reasons for your block of this user on his talk page. Thank you. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 08:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
273691 +++$+++ Gnangarra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273690 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.175804400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for stepping in with graph, I looked into its use and found that it was removed as the information isnt presented correctly, accurately and some it isnt even from the quoted source. I have listed it for deletion as UnEncyclopedic also noted its use in disruptive editing at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion\/2007 April 5#Image:Sketch-4race-transparent2.png|Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]].  +++$+++ ::Thanks for stepping in with graph, I looked into its use and found that it was removed as the information isnt presented correctly, accurately and some it isnt even from the quoted source. I have listed it for deletion as UnEncyclopedic also noted its use in disruptive editing at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 April 5#Image:Sketch-4race-transparent2.png|Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]]. [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 13:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
273692 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273691 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.175805960E09 +++$+++ Ta for that, Gnang. I can't say I'm surprised to hear that the graph has all those issues. I did wonder about it myself when I first saw it and I meant to go back and look into it further but I've been having computer problems. Thanks for following through with it. I'll check out the deletion listing. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :::Ta for that, Gnang. I can't say I'm surprised to hear that the graph has all those issues. I did wonder about it myself when I first saw it and I meant to go back and look into it further but I've been having computer problems. Thanks for following through with it. I'll check out the deletion listing. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 13:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
273693 +++$+++ Buddhipriya +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273692 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.175822460E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for blocking him, as he has persisted in making disruptive edits to pages such as [[Yoga]], [[Yoga as exercise]], and [[Kundalini yoga]], as well as using an image of a Hindu goddess and making unsupported claims about \"yogic practices\" on pages such as [[Sodomy]] and [[Anal sex]] page.  Since this user has also been accused of sock puppetry, I hope that you will place some of these pages on your watch list for a while, as I expect he will return in some way to continue with the disruptive behavior.  +++$+++ ::::Thank you very much for blocking him, as he has persisted in making disruptive edits to pages such as [[Yoga]], [[Yoga as exercise]], and [[Kundalini yoga]], as well as using an image of a Hindu goddess and making unsupported claims about "yogic practices" on pages such as [[Sodomy]] and [[Anal sex]] page.  Since this user has also been accused of sock puppetry, I hope that you will place some of these pages on your watch list for a while, as I expect he will return in some way to continue with the disruptive behavior. [[User:Buddhipriya|Buddhipriya]] 18:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
273694 +++$+++ Aminz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273693 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.175856000E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for the block, Sarah. -- +++$+++ ::::: Thanks very much for the block, Sarah. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 03:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
273695 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273694 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.175892660E09 +++$+++ Wow, I've never before had so many people contact me (on my talk page and via email) to thank me for placing a block! Thank you all for the feedback and support. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ ::::::Wow, I've never before had so many people contact me (on my talk page and via email) to thank me for placing a block! Thank you all for the feedback and support. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 13:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
273696 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273695 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.175956800E09 +++$+++ Houston, we have a sockpuppet: {{vandal|BongHitz4Musa}}... Islamic + homosexuality + swastika edits (to  +++$+++ :::::::Houston, we have a sockpuppet: {{vandal|BongHitz4Musa}}... Islamic + homosexuality + swastika edits (to [[User talk:DavidYork71]] no less). I recommend indef. blocking of both this account and DavidYork71's main account at this point. {{User:Netscott/s1.js}} 07:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
273697 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273696 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.175957400E09 +++$+++ I think  +++$+++ ::::::::I think [[User:BongHitz4Musa]]'s [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Article_Creation_and_Improvement_Drive&diff=prev&oldid=119705981 signing up] for article improvement of the [[Adolf Hitler]] article is the clencher. {{User:Netscott/s1.js}} 07:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
273698 +++$+++ Aminz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273697 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 08:13:00 +++$+++ 1.175958780E09 +++$+++ David had previously evaded his block. -- +++$+++ ::::::::: David had previously evaded his block. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 08:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
273699 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273698 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.175961060E09 +++$+++ Blocked the sock indefinitely for now.  +++$+++ :::::::::: Blocked the sock indefinitely for now. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 08:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
273700 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273692 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.175961600E09 +++$+++ Your comment on Orderinchaos talk page suggests that we should thank you for your original block and I am sure there will be support for your extending any further block  +++$+++ ::::Your comment on Orderinchaos talk page suggests that we should thank you for your original block and I am sure there will be support for your extending any further block [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 09:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
273701 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273700 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 09:17:00 +++$+++ 1.175962620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that Satu. It's just ridiculous...I think someone should propose a community ban or an RfC or something. Anyway, I have to go offline in a few minutes so take care and enjoy the rest of the Easter weekend. :) Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :::::Thanks for that Satu. It's just ridiculous...I think someone should propose a community ban or an RfC or something. Anyway, I have to go offline in a few minutes so take care and enjoy the rest of the Easter weekend. :) Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 09:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
273702 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273689 +++$+++ 273695 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Next, {{vandal|Amatullah33}} (tryinng to be clever in his username). {{User:Netscott\/s1.js}} 09:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :::::::Next, {{vandal|Amatullah33}} (tryinng to be clever in his username). {{User:Netscott/s1.js}} 09:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

535835 +++$+++  +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I appreciate your thanks for supporting the waste-stub, but I'm a little concerned about some other things. I noticed that in supporting other stubs, you asked people for their opinion on your waste-stub. It's generally not a good idea to go around scrounging for votes. It's frowned upon during a RfA (see \"advertising\"), and it doesn't look that great on WP:WSS\/P either. Also, there is a 7 day waiting period between the proposal and the creation. Meaning, since you proposed it on the 7th, you should wait until the 14th to create it, thereby allowing enough time for discussion and debate. It's too late to bother in this case, but that's something to keep in mind for the future. Thanks for your participation in WP:WSS. Have a great day and happy editing. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 14:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ I appreciate your thanks for supporting the waste-stub, but I'm a little concerned about some other things. I noticed that in supporting other stubs, you asked people for their opinion on your waste-stub. It's generally not a good idea to go around scrounging for votes. It's frowned upon during a RfA (see "advertising"), and it doesn't look that great on WP:WSS/P either. Also, there is a 7 day waiting period between the proposal and the creation. Meaning, since you proposed it on the 7th, you should wait until the 14th to create it, thereby allowing enough time for discussion and debate. It's too late to bother in this case, but that's something to keep in mind for the future. Thanks for your participation in WP:WSS. Have a great day and happy editing. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 14:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
535836 +++$+++ Vortexrealm +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535835 +++$+++ 535835 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.155307380E09 +++$+++ Hi Amalas, I had been watching the WP:WSS for a few days and no one had made any comments on my suggestion. It's not the most interesting area and I didnt really expect a great deal of interest in waste, that was the reason I opened dialogue with other project suggesters. I didn't really consider it advertising, just asking for an opinion. Sorry for the mistake-- +++$+++ : Hi Amalas, I had been watching the WP:WSS for a few days and no one had made any comments on my suggestion. It's not the most interesting area and I didnt really expect a great deal of interest in waste, that was the reason I opened dialogue with other project suggesters. I didn't really consider it advertising, just asking for an opinion. Sorry for the mistake--[[User:Vortexrealm|Alex]] 07:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

11549 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-02 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.220348760E09 +++$+++ Some nice discoveries added to [[Dick Briefer]]. My compliments! --  +++$+++ Some nice discoveries added to [[Dick Briefer]]. My compliments! -- [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 02:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
11550 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11549 +++$+++ 11549 +++$+++ 2008-09-02 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.220352420E09 +++$+++ Thanks! When I wrote the original [[Novelty Press]] article, you hadn't yet written the Briefer bio, so thanks to you there was that context \u2014  +++$+++ : Thanks! When I wrote the original [[Novelty Press]] article, you hadn't yet written the Briefer bio, so thanks to you there was that context — [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 03:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

11551 +++$+++ CzechOut +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11551 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-10 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.221114840E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bob_Haney&oldid=188630961 Your addition on 2 February 2008], though cited, was a wholesale theft of Mark Evanier's words.  While Wikipedia obviously encourages citation of sources, you can't just copy something word-for-word and add a citation \u2014 unless you are actually quoting someone.  ''' +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bob_Haney&oldid=188630961 Your addition on 2 February 2008], though cited, was a wholesale theft of Mark Evanier's words.  While Wikipedia obviously encourages citation of sources, you can't just copy something word-for-word and add a citation — unless you are actually quoting someone.  '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]'''  [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 23:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
11552 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11551 +++$+++ 11551 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.221127560E09 +++$+++ My bad. I did that early on when I was still getting a hang of this. I'm trying to be more careful now, and I certainly meant no harm. \u2014  +++$+++ : My bad. I did that early on when I was still getting a hang of this. I'm trying to be more careful now, and I certainly meant no harm. — [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 03:06, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
11553 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11551 +++$+++ 11552 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.221181620E09 +++$+++ I've tried to fix the issue, and created a [[Talk:Bob_Haney\/Temp|temp entry]] with the offending material rewritten and reconfigured. Check it out and let me know if it resolved the issue. Once again, apologies. \u2014  +++$+++ :: I've tried to fix the issue, and created a [[Talk:Bob_Haney/Temp|temp entry]] with the offending material rewritten and reconfigured. Check it out and let me know if it resolved the issue. Once again, apologies. — [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster|talk]]) 18:07, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
11554 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11551 +++$+++ 11551 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.221189240E09 +++$+++ Good point about the issue of bibliography heds. Thanks \u2014  +++$+++ : Good point about the issue of bibliography heds. Thanks — [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 20:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
11555 +++$+++ Ntnon +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11551 +++$+++ 11554 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.221350520E09 +++$+++ So it might be safer for the time being not to guess at all, but at \"best guess\": Americans. [http:\/\/coa.inducks.org\/creator.php?c=Ian+Akin Pretty] [http:\/\/coa.inducks.org\/creator.php?c=Brian+Garvey definitely]. :o)  +++$+++ ::So it might be safer for the time being not to guess at all, but at "best guess": Americans. [http://coa.inducks.org/creator.php?c=Ian+Akin Pretty] [http://coa.inducks.org/creator.php?c=Brian+Garvey definitely]. :o) [[User:Ntnon|ntnon]] ([[User talk:Ntnon|talk]]) 17:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

535840 +++$+++ Xsxex +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535840 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-23 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.156378800E09 +++$+++ I wrote you because you had contributed to the [[punk house]] article or punk house related subjects. sorry if you're not interested.  +++$+++ I wrote you because you had contributed to the [[punk house]] article or punk house related subjects. sorry if you're not interested. [[User:Xsxex|Xsxex]] 17:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
535841 +++$+++ Xsxex +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535840 +++$+++ 535840 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.156379340E09 +++$+++ Ok sorry, but I am just trying to contact those who might support this article. We have yet to come up with a way to organize users. Thus I took it upon myself to contact the users who have contributed to the [[punk house]] article and the articles associated with it. The first comment back about the Deletion Review was to have the info from the Theta Beta Potata included on the punk house article. So it would affect the punk house article. It also might in turn affect the other articles about specific punk houses.  +++$+++ *Ok sorry, but I am just trying to contact those who might support this article. We have yet to come up with a way to organize users. Thus I took it upon myself to contact the users who have contributed to the [[punk house]] article and the articles associated with it. The first comment back about the Deletion Review was to have the info from the Theta Beta Potata included on the punk house article. So it would affect the punk house article. It also might in turn affect the other articles about specific punk houses. [[User:Xsxex|Xsxex]] 17:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

45616 +++$+++ Fallschirmjäger +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45616 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-23 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.295843040E09 +++$+++ {{Map workshop reply|File:Mangalorean catholic migration.JPG}} <i style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;\"> +++$+++ {{Map workshop reply|File:Mangalorean catholic migration.JPG}} <i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">[[User:Fallschirmjäger|<b style="color:#4D5D53">Fallschirm</b><b style="color:#2E8B57">jäger</b>]]<b style="color:#701"></b>[[User talk:Fallschirmjäger|</i>&nbsp;<b style="color:#3CB371">&#9993;</b>]] 20:24, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
45617 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45616 +++$+++ 45616 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.295933820E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 21:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

11556 +++$+++ Nutiketaiel +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-16 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.221622440E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to recognize you for all the hard work you've been putting into the page on the Legion and its creators.  Thanks.  :-)   +++$+++ Just wanted to recognize you for all the hard work you've been putting into the page on the Legion and its creators.  Thanks.  :-)  [[User:Nutiketaiel|Nutiketaiel]] ([[User talk:Nutiketaiel|talk]]) 20:34, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
11557 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11556 +++$+++ 11556 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.221622800E09 +++$+++ Wow! I'm thrilled and honored. Thanks so much! Can I post it on my User page? \u2014  +++$+++ : Wow! I'm thrilled and honored. Thanks so much! Can I post it on my User page? — [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 20:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
11558 +++$+++ Nutiketaiel +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11556 +++$+++ 11557 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.221623100E09 +++$+++ Of course, feel free.  :-)   +++$+++ ::Of course, feel free.  :-)  [[User:Nutiketaiel|Nutiketaiel]] ([[User talk:Nutiketaiel|talk]]) 20:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

11559 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-18 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.221791820E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Comics]] - there's been some talk there about fixing up the various comics creators articles which have been selected for the release.  :) I condensed the list [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics\/Wikipedia 0.7|here]].  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Comics]] - there's been some talk there about fixing up the various comics creators articles which have been selected for the release.  :) I condensed the list [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Wikipedia 0.7|here]]. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 19:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
11560 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11559 +++$+++ 11559 +++$+++ 2008-09-30 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.222771620E09 +++$+++ Cool. Works for me. \u2014  +++$+++ : Cool. Works for me. — [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 03:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

273704 +++$+++ SGGH +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.175895660E09 +++$+++ thanks for saying I was an excellent adopter :)  +++$+++ thanks for saying I was an excellent adopter :) [[User:SGGH|SGGH]] 14:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
273705 +++$+++ SGGH +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.175906820E09 +++$+++ Aw, cheers.  +++$+++ ::Aw, cheers. [[User:SGGH|SGGH]] 17:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

11562 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11562 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-10 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.226320980E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to say nice job on the John Warner article you created. Very well-referenced and cited! --  +++$+++ Just wanted to say nice job on the John Warner article you created. Very well-referenced and cited! -- [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 04:43, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
11563 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11562 +++$+++ 11562 +++$+++ 2008-11-10 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.226322120E09 +++$+++ Thank you, sir! As usual with me, it was one of those situations where his name kept coming up, and the only way I could learn about him was by compiling the information myself. --  +++$+++ : Thank you, sir! As usual with me, it was one of those situations where his name kept coming up, and the only way I could learn about him was by compiling the information myself. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|Stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 05:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

273707 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.175921760E09 +++$+++ Happy Easter to you too Sarah.  Thank you for your positive message and thoughts.  I have responded at that part of my talk page. -- +++$+++ Happy Easter to you too Sarah.  Thank you for your positive message and thoughts.  I have responded at that part of my talk page. --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 21:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
273708 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273707 +++$+++ 273707 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.175925840E09 +++$+++ ''(copied from my talk page)'' - That's no problems Longhair - I can wait - my thoughts over the past couple of weeks have been that I can help with what you, Sarah, Golden Wattle etc are doing.  My personal and work life are at a stage now where I can and want to be on Wiki a heck of a lot (my girlfriend says she is a wiki-widow!).  Sarah's comments are very helpful.  Let's wait and I'll ask her through this message to keep an eye on my edits and perhsps she won't mind letting me know when I reach a better stage of wiki life.-- +++$+++ *''(copied from my talk page)'' - That's no problems Longhair - I can wait - my thoughts over the past couple of weeks have been that I can help with what you, Sarah, Golden Wattle etc are doing.  My personal and work life are at a stage now where I can and want to be on Wiki a heck of a lot (my girlfriend says she is a wiki-widow!).  Sarah's comments are very helpful.  Let's wait and I'll ask her through this message to keep an eye on my edits and perhsps she won't mind letting me know when I reach a better stage of wiki life.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 23:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

11564 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-03 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.230974280E09 +++$+++ Happy New Year! Hope it's off to a good start. --  +++$+++ Happy New Year! Hope it's off to a good start. -- [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 01:18, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
11565 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11564 +++$+++ 11564 +++$+++ 2009-01-03 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.230978000E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Tenebrae! And the same to you and yours. \u2014  +++$+++ : Thanks, Tenebrae! And the same to you and yours. — [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 02:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

273709 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273709 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-09 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.176140280E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah.  I have had a great Easter - lot's of good healthy chocolate:-D Thanks for picking up on my [[WP:AIV]] work on the side - and yes I will post also to there to get the appropriate skills and composite recognition.  I would be pleased if you let me know when you think I am ready - in fact when you do think that then please feel free to nominate solo or with Mr Longhair and I will be proud to accept formally.  I am in absolutely no rush and I am enjoying my standard editing way enough to continue and continue and continue.  Thank you again.-- +++$+++ Thanks Sarah.  I have had a great Easter - lot's of good healthy chocolate:-D Thanks for picking up on my [[WP:AIV]] work on the side - and yes I will post also to there to get the appropriate skills and composite recognition.  I would be pleased if you let me know when you think I am ready - in fact when you do think that then please feel free to nominate solo or with Mr Longhair and I will be proud to accept formally.  I am in absolutely no rush and I am enjoying my standard editing way enough to continue and continue and continue.  Thank you again.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 10:38, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
273710 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273709 +++$+++ 273709 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.176233160E09 +++$+++ I haven't stopped smiling since I just saw your last revert on Longhair's page - I know I'm getting there when I get a direct mention and a user page name from our favourite non-editor... -- +++$+++ *I haven't stopped smiling since I just saw your last revert on Longhair's page - I know I'm getting there when I get a direct mention and a user page name from our favourite non-editor... --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 12:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

11567 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11567 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-05 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.233889260E09 +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for adding some information with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Frank_Quitely&diff=268728257&oldid=267912779 your edit to the Frank Quitely article]. However, much of the material you added is unsourced, which violates the [[WP:V|Verifiability]] policy, and so I removed most of that. However, because I'm familiar with the Eisner Awards website, I went there and got citations for Quitely's Eisners, so that I wouldn't have to delete that, much as I did with the [[Jeff Smith (cartoonist)|Jeff Smith]] and [[Bone (comics)|Bone]] articles. I also added some info on his nominations. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for adding some information with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frank_Quitely&diff=268728257&oldid=267912779 your edit to the Frank Quitely article]. However, much of the material you added is unsourced, which violates the [[WP:V|Verifiability]] policy, and so I removed most of that. However, because I'm familiar with the Eisner Awards website, I went there and got citations for Quitely's Eisners, so that I wouldn't have to delete that, much as I did with the [[Jeff Smith (cartoonist)|Jeff Smith]] and [[Bone (comics)|Bone]] articles. I also added some info on his nominations. Thanks. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 19:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
11568 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11567 +++$+++ 11567 +++$+++ 2009-02-05 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.233890040E09 +++$+++ In any case, I found the respective sources for Quitely's article and added them back. Thanks. --  +++$+++ : In any case, I found the respective sources for Quitely's article and added them back. Thanks. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 19:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

11570 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11570 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-02 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.235986500E09 +++$+++ They all currently have one of the {{tl|notability}} tags on them, so they need decent sourcing, and many are stubs so therefore could use expansion. There are over 200 comics articles with a notability tag in all, but I know that some of your best work has been with creators; I really dug your recent work on [[Ms. Marvel]] by the way. :)  +++$+++ They all currently have one of the {{tl|notability}} tags on them, so they need decent sourcing, and many are stubs so therefore could use expansion. There are over 200 comics articles with a notability tag in all, but I know that some of your best work has been with creators; I really dug your recent work on [[Ms. Marvel]] by the way. :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 01:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
11571 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11570 +++$+++ 11570 +++$+++ 2009-03-03 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.236080400E09 +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:BOZ|BOZ]]! I can't say I'm familiar with any of the folks above \u2014 except for [[Tom Spurgeon]], so maybe he's the one I should start with! --  +++$+++ : Thanks, [[User:BOZ|BOZ]]! I can't say I'm familiar with any of the folks above — except for [[Tom Spurgeon]], so maybe he's the one I should start with! -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 03:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
11572 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11570 +++$+++ 11571 +++$+++ 2009-03-03 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.236130440E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I figured they were pretty obscure, but I tossed it out there anyway. :) I'll bring it up on the comics project talk page and see if anyone can help (or if there's anything worth helping!)  +++$+++ ::Yeah, I figured they were pretty obscure, but I tossed it out there anyway. :) I'll bring it up on the comics project talk page and see if anyone can help (or if there's anything worth helping!) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 17:34, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

307763 +++$+++ Rcpaterson +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-25 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.151287200E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Rcpaterson|Rcpaterson]] 19:00, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
307764 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307763 +++$+++ 307763 +++$+++ 2006-06-25 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.151298600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that help, and apologies for distracting you from the Wars of Independence. I'm now happy that there's enough ammunition to deal with such unsubstantiated complaints. A thorough overhaul will be welcome, my contribution is really just a sticking plaster to try to bring some slight improvement in the meantime. It's certainly a complex subject, riddled with myth. ..  +++$+++ :Thanks for that help, and apologies for distracting you from the Wars of Independence. I'm now happy that there's enough ammunition to deal with such unsubstantiated complaints. A thorough overhaul will be welcome, my contribution is really just a sticking plaster to try to bring some slight improvement in the meantime. It's certainly a complex subject, riddled with myth. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:10, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

11573 +++$+++ a +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-06 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.236376020E09 +++$+++ Hey, Stoshmaster. I saw that you recently contributed heavily to the [[Ms. Marvel]] article, and I must say it is brilliant - it definately boosts up the article's quality. I'm currently working on turning it into a [[WP:GA|good article]], but before that happens, would it be possible if you could give me your opinion on something that came up [[Talk:Ms. Marvel#Multiple Ms. Marvels?|here]]? If it isn't too much of a bother. -- <font face=\"Trebuchet MS\" > +++$+++ Hey, Stoshmaster. I saw that you recently contributed heavily to the [[Ms. Marvel]] article, and I must say it is brilliant - it definately boosts up the article's quality. I'm currently working on turning it into a [[WP:GA|good article]], but before that happens, would it be possible if you could give me your opinion on something that came up [[Talk:Ms. Marvel#Multiple Ms. Marvels?|here]]? If it isn't too much of a bother. -- <font face="Trebuchet MS" >[[User:A|A]] <small><sup>'''[[User talk:A|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/A|contribs]]'''</sub></small></font> 13:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
11574 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11573 +++$+++ 11573 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.237521300E09 +++$+++ Wow, glad I asked. I guess I have to go back and add the defaultsort back for a bunch of entries. --  +++$+++ : Wow, glad I asked. I guess I have to go back and add the defaultsort back for a bunch of entries. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 20:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

273718 +++$+++ Aminz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-09 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.176114720E09 +++$+++ P.S. (User:Gnangarra detected  the other David's sock [[User:Gifir2007]] and indef-blocked it.) -- +++$+++ P.S. (User:Gnangarra detected  the other David's sock [[User:Gifir2007]] and indef-blocked it.) --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 03:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
273719 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273718 +++$+++ 273718 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.176115020E09 +++$+++ Blocked. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Blocked. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 03:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
273720 +++$+++ Aminz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273718 +++$+++ 273719 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.176115080E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah. -- +++$+++ :: Thanks Sarah. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 03:38, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

11575 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-10 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.239424920E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films|project talk page]]. We look forward to working with you in the future! \u2014<font face=\"Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films|project talk page]]. We look forward to working with you in the future! —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) 21:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
11576 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11575 +++$+++ 11575 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.240460640E09 +++$+++ Sending the question over to Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed is a great idea! I can't think of anything else off-hand for them to tackle, but I think the Legion-Imperial Guard issue is such a rich one that Brian Cronin could devote a whole piece to it. (By the way, the topic was broached (by a commenter named Jack Fear) in [http:\/\/goodcomics.comicbookresources.com\/2006\/07\/20\/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-60\/ this article], and not refuted by Cronin, but I don't suppose that's exactly a valid citation...) --  +++$+++ : Sending the question over to Comic Book Urban Legends Revealed is a great idea! I can't think of anything else off-hand for them to tackle, but I think the Legion-Imperial Guard issue is such a rich one that Brian Cronin could devote a whole piece to it. (By the way, the topic was broached (by a commenter named Jack Fear) in [http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/07/20/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-60/ this article], and not refuted by Cronin, but I don't suppose that's exactly a valid citation...) -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 21:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
11577 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11575 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.240467120E09 +++$+++ I'm not an Eternals person, so I wouldn't know about that. If you have the ''X-Men Companion'', definitely look it up, because I am obviously wary of \"Internet telephone,\" where rumors get repeated as fact. (Though in this case, I am 100% sure that it is the case that the Imperial Guard members were analogues of the Legion members!) One example of being careful of accepted \"fact\" was some articles I worked on last week having to do with [[Northstar (comics)|Northstar]] and [[Jim Shooter]]'s purported statement that there \"are no gay superheroes in the Marvel universe.\" I did some research and found that he never said exactly that; rather, his position was more nuanced (if ultimately, just as homophobic). In any case, I wrote it up in Northstar's entry, which I'm rather proud of... --  +++$+++ ::: I'm not an Eternals person, so I wouldn't know about that. If you have the ''X-Men Companion'', definitely look it up, because I am obviously wary of "Internet telephone," where rumors get repeated as fact. (Though in this case, I am 100% sure that it is the case that the Imperial Guard members were analogues of the Legion members!) One example of being careful of accepted "fact" was some articles I worked on last week having to do with [[Northstar (comics)|Northstar]] and [[Jim Shooter]]'s purported statement that there "are no gay superheroes in the Marvel universe." I did some research and found that he never said exactly that; rather, his position was more nuanced (if ultimately, just as homophobic). In any case, I wrote it up in Northstar's entry, which I'm rather proud of... -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 23:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

535864 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535864 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-21 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.164152940E09 +++$+++ Are you interested? You'll make an interested candidate - but there's precedent for adminship granted to stub sorters. - <b> +++$+++ Are you interested? You'll make an interested candidate - but there's precedent for adminship granted to stub sorters. - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|crz]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|crztalk]]</small> 15:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
535865 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535864 +++$+++ 535864 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.164154860E09 +++$+++ You may indeed be rejected on that basis - but there is precedent for narrow bases for an RfA. See e.g. [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Art LaPella|Art LaPella]], who was promoted based on a desire to correct spelling mistakes on the front page. - <b> +++$+++ :You may indeed be rejected on that basis - but there is precedent for narrow bases for an RfA. See e.g. [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Art LaPella|Art LaPella]], who was promoted based on a desire to correct spelling mistakes on the front page. - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|crz]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|crztalk]]</small> 16:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
535866 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535864 +++$+++ 535865 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.164609180E09 +++$+++ So - shall I draft it? - <b> +++$+++ ::So - shall I draft it? - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|crz]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|crztalk]]</small> 22:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

273721 +++$+++ Aminz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273721 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-09 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.176130800E09 +++$+++ Another possible sock of David. Account created only to revert to DavidYork's puppet versions. -- +++$+++ Another possible sock of David. Account created only to revert to DavidYork's puppet versions. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 08:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
273722 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273721 +++$+++ 273721 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.176142920E09 +++$+++ Blocked that one. ''' +++$+++ :Blocked that one. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 11:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

273723 +++$+++ Aminz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-09 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.176133920E09 +++$+++ These all follow the pattern of David's previous edits. -- +++$+++ These all follow the pattern of David's previous edits. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 08:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
273724 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273723 +++$+++ 273723 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.176143460E09 +++$+++ Okay, Aminz, I've blocked that one as well but can you please make sure that you also have it on your watchlist in case they protest (and prod me if they do). Thanks, ''' +++$+++ :Okay, Aminz, I've blocked that one as well but can you please make sure that you also have it on your watchlist in case they protest (and prod me if they do). Thanks, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 11:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

11580 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11580 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-13 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.252829340E09 +++$+++ Hey there, have you had much of an opportunity to interact with [[User:Tenebrae]]? I know he is also very interested in working on articles of comics creators, so I figured you two might want to compare notes at some point now that he is back. :)  +++$+++ Hey there, have you had much of an opportunity to interact with [[User:Tenebrae]]? I know he is also very interested in working on articles of comics creators, so I figured you two might want to compare notes at some point now that he is back. :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 01:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
11581 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11580 +++$+++ 11580 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.253095560E09 +++$+++ Yes, [[User:Tenebrae]] and I have been in touch over the years, and have enjoyed working together. He is a very good editor. Thanks for thinking of me. --  +++$+++ : Yes, [[User:Tenebrae]] and I have been in touch over the years, and have enjoyed working together. He is a very good editor. Thanks for thinking of me. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 03:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
11582 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11580 +++$+++ 11581 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.253128140E09 +++$+++ Hey, no problem - it's good to see him back; he's been gone since January!  +++$+++ ::Hey, no problem - it's good to see him back; he's been gone since January! [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 12:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
11583 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11580 +++$+++ 11581 +++$+++ 2009-10-18 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.255926360E09 +++$+++ I was actually just about to compliment Stoshmaster on your dedicated efforts at infoboxing the scores of comics professionals and keeping the format updated. I also wanted to ask about [[Lloyd Jacquet]], who as you note (and I'd missed!) had immigrated to the U.S. Do we know that he became naturalized, or did he perhaps remain a resident alien (like my 70-something mother-in-law, who came here in the 1950s ... and believe it or not, was a DC receptionist and secretary in the late 1950s and knew Bob Kanigher, Julie Schwartz and the like!) -- +++$+++ ::I was actually just about to compliment Stoshmaster on your dedicated efforts at infoboxing the scores of comics professionals and keeping the format updated. I also wanted to ask about [[Lloyd Jacquet]], who as you note (and I'd missed!) had immigrated to the U.S. Do we know that he became naturalized, or did he perhaps remain a resident alien (like my 70-something mother-in-law, who came here in the 1950s ... and believe it or not, was a DC receptionist and secretary in the late 1950s and knew Bob Kanigher, Julie Schwartz and the like!) --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 21:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
11584 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11580 +++$+++ 11583 +++$+++ 2009-10-18 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.255926780E09 +++$+++ And thanks for the kind words, [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]], I'm doing my best. ;-> --  +++$+++ :::And thanks for the kind words, [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]], I'm doing my best. ;-> -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 21:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
11585 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11580 +++$+++ 11584 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.256188560E09 +++$+++ BTW, ''killer'' job at [[Sam Rosen (comics)|Sam Rosen]], man! Nice, nice work there and at [[Howard Purcell]], too! --  +++$+++ ::::BTW, ''killer'' job at [[Sam Rosen (comics)|Sam Rosen]], man! Nice, nice work there and at [[Howard Purcell]], too! -- [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 22:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
11586 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11580 +++$+++ 11585 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.256335260E09 +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]]. It's sad, like in [[Joe Rosen]]'s case, that often we don't get the full details about a person's career until they die. You've been doing amazing work in this arena; I feel like every article I come across -- where I might add a small detail here and there -- has already been extensively researched and written by you! \u2014  +++$+++ ::::: Thanks, [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]]. It's sad, like in [[Joe Rosen]]'s case, that often we don't get the full details about a person's career until they die. You've been doing amazing work in this arena; I feel like every article I come across -- where I might add a small detail here and there -- has already been extensively researched and written by you! — [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 15:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
11587 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11580 +++$+++ 11580 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.257911340E09 +++$+++ Hey, sorry it took me a while to get back to you. You've been doing some solid work on these old publishers, and I encourage you to keep it up. (I took the liberty of putting in the \"Distinguish\" template for you on those pages.) Hmmm, my suggestions for the Future Comics and King Comics titles would be Future Comics (David McKay) and King Comics (David McKay). What do you think? --  +++$+++ : Hey, sorry it took me a while to get back to you. You've been doing some solid work on these old publishers, and I encourage you to keep it up. (I took the liberty of putting in the "Distinguish" template for you on those pages.) Hmmm, my suggestions for the Future Comics and King Comics titles would be Future Comics (David McKay) and King Comics (David McKay). What do you think? -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 19:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

535869 +++$+++ Alai +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535869 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-28 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164771240E09 +++$+++ OK, I confess to being a little bemused as to what Crz is up to -- in the space of a couple of hours, he's said he's waiting until his (snowballish) RFB is concluded, then archived my followup question without reply, withdrawn his nomination, and gone on a wikibreak.  Rather than leaving you hanging around for who-knows-how-long, I'd like to offer to nominate you myself.  I should stress this isn't ''just'' a mulligan, it's been in my mind for some time to do so, given your \"adminish\" (and generally helpful) contribs at SFD (and to WSS in the round).  I can't offer you any guarantees, but for my money in terms of risk\/benefit, it ''should'' be a slam-dunk.  But some people have some very strange ideas about adminship (the notorious 1FA, and the like), so who knows...   +++$+++ OK, I confess to being a little bemused as to what Crz is up to -- in the space of a couple of hours, he's said he's waiting until his (snowballish) RFB is concluded, then archived my followup question without reply, withdrawn his nomination, and gone on a wikibreak.  Rather than leaving you hanging around for who-knows-how-long, I'd like to offer to nominate you myself.  I should stress this isn't ''just'' a mulligan, it's been in my mind for some time to do so, given your "adminish" (and generally helpful) contribs at SFD (and to WSS in the round).  I can't offer you any guarantees, but for my money in terms of risk/benefit, it ''should'' be a slam-dunk.  But some people have some very strange ideas about adminship (the notorious 1FA, and the like), so who knows...  [[User:Alai|Alai]] 19:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
535870 +++$+++ Alai +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535869 +++$+++ 535869 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.164793800E09 +++$+++ Yes, the affirmative part of your followup was useful clarification. :)  No real cause for panic, though.  OK, I've written up the [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Amalas|nomination]];  if it's not too rambling and incoherent, go ahead and answer the questions, accept, and add it to the \"live\" list.   +++$+++ :Yes, the affirmative part of your followup was useful clarification. :)  No real cause for panic, though.  OK, I've written up the [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Amalas|nomination]];  if it's not too rambling and incoherent, go ahead and answer the questions, accept, and add it to the "live" list.  [[User:Alai|Alai]] 01:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
535871 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535869 +++$+++ 535870 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.164796140E09 +++$+++ My apologies. I am a loser. I stood a lady up :) - <b> +++$+++ ::My apologies. I am a loser. I stood a lady up :) - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|crz]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|crztalk]]</small> 02:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
535872 +++$+++ Alai +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535869 +++$+++ 535871 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.164796380E09 +++$+++ Enmopment means the state of having a mop, or the process of being given a mop:  I thought that would have been obvious! :)   +++$+++ :::Enmopment means the state of having a mop, or the process of being given a mop:  I thought that would have been obvious! :)  [[User:Alai|Alai]] 02:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
535873 +++$+++ Alai +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535869 +++$+++ 535872 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.164797040E09 +++$+++ My secret weakness for silly words (or alleged words) might not be so secret...   +++$+++ ::::My secret weakness for silly words (or alleged words) might not be so secret...  [[User:Alai|Alai]] 02:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
535874 +++$+++ Alai +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535869 +++$+++ 535873 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.164797880E09 +++$+++ Dubious is a perfectly cromulent-- eh, sensible word!  My excessive use of it is (no doubt...) a reflection of my St. Thomasesque\/jnana yoga tendencies (to put it in (indubitably) unduly kind terms).   +++$+++ :::::Dubious is a perfectly cromulent-- eh, sensible word!  My excessive use of it is (no doubt...) a reflection of my St. Thomasesque/jnana yoga tendencies (to put it in (indubitably) unduly kind terms).  [[User:Alai|Alai]] 02:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

273729 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273729 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-09 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.176147120E09 +++$+++ You know... [[Lano and Woodley|the thingy]]! &ndash; <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ You know... [[Lano and Woodley|the thingy]]! &ndash; <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:Riana|Riana]] <sup>[[User talk:Riana|<font color="seagreen">ऋ</font>]]</sup></span> 12:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
273730 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273729 +++$+++ 273729 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.176147420E09 +++$+++ Heh, no worries :) It's really easy now to put stuff in now, you can just switch things around in the template. No, I didn't steal the template from [[User:Newyorkbrad\/Barnstar|Brad]]. Cheers, &ndash; <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ :Heh, no worries :) It's really easy now to put stuff in now, you can just switch things around in the template. No, I didn't steal the template from [[User:Newyorkbrad/Barnstar|Brad]]. Cheers, &ndash; <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:Riana|Riana]] <sup>[[User talk:Riana|<font color="seagreen">ऋ</font>]]</sup></span> 12:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

11589 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-09 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.257802440E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Comics creators articles by quality|Here]] is something that might pique your interest. :)  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Comics creators articles by quality|Here]] is something that might pique your interest. :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 13:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
11590 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11589 +++$+++ 11589 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.257910620E09 +++$+++ Hey, BOZ, that's already an impressive article. (As usual, it looks like [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] did some quality work.) I don't know what more I could add to it, other than maybe some little tidbits here and there. Right now I've been concentrating on populating the 1980s in comics pages, and documenting the foundation and defunct dates for various comics publishers. Thanks for the tip about the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Comics creators articles by quality]] page. Very helpful! --  +++$+++ : Hey, BOZ, that's already an impressive article. (As usual, it looks like [[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] did some quality work.) I don't know what more I could add to it, other than maybe some little tidbits here and there. Right now I've been concentrating on populating the 1980s in comics pages, and documenting the foundation and defunct dates for various comics publishers. Thanks for the tip about the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Comics creators articles by quality]] page. Very helpful! -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 19:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
11591 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11589 +++$+++ 11589 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.258027320E09 +++$+++ Got it. Thanks for the heads-up. --  +++$+++ : Got it. Thanks for the heads-up. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 04:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
11592 +++$+++ NatGertler +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11589 +++$+++ 11591 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.258033440E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but, um, you added an extra decade to our age. Easy typo. --  +++$+++ :: Thanks, but, um, you added an extra decade to our age. Easy typo. -- [[User:NatGertler|Nat Gertler]] ([[User talk:NatGertler|talk]]) 05:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
11593 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11589 +++$+++ 11592 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 05:50:00 +++$+++ 1.258033800E09 +++$+++ Whoops! Sorry! Fixed. --  +++$+++ ::: Whoops! Sorry! Fixed. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 05:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

273734 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273734 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.176206700E09 +++$+++ (Also posted at [[WP:AIV]])  :-)  - {{vandal|Gipps}} account created as a Sockpuppet of Rosinaharris - as part of Gundagai Banned Editor's routine. -- +++$+++ (Also posted at [[WP:AIV]])  :-)  - {{vandal|Gipps}} account created as a Sockpuppet of Rosinaharris - as part of Gundagai Banned Editor's routine. --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 05:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
273735 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273734 +++$+++ 273734 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.176207420E09 +++$+++ Fantastic. :) I went to block it but GW beat me to it. :) Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Fantastic. :) I went to block it but GW beat me to it. :) Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 05:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

273736 +++$+++ Aminz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 08:48:00 +++$+++ 1.176220080E09 +++$+++ Please take a look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=129.78.64.102].   This IP is based in Sydney Australia and is interested in the \"Islam and slavery\" and \"Islam and children\" articles. -- +++$+++ Please take a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=129.78.64.102].   This IP is based in Sydney Australia and is interested in the "Islam and slavery" and "Islam and children" articles. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 08:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
273737 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273736 +++$+++ 273736 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.176220320E09 +++$+++ that IP is for the University of Sydney and so thousands of people would have access to it. ''' +++$+++ :that IP is for the University of Sydney and so thousands of people would have access to it. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 08:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
273738 +++$+++ Aminz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273736 +++$+++ 273737 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.176220440E09 +++$+++ Hmmm. But it is certainly David. He is reverting back to one of his previous versions on \"[[Islam and slavery]]\" article. Can you please sprotect that article. Thanks -- +++$+++ :: Hmmm. But it is certainly David. He is reverting back to one of his previous versions on "[[Islam and slavery]]" article. Can you please sprotect that article. Thanks --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 08:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
273739 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273736 +++$+++ 273738 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.176221040E09 +++$+++ I blocked it for an hour but that's really all I can do because it is definitely registered to Sydney Uni. ''' +++$+++ :::I blocked it for an hour but that's really all I can do because it is definitely registered to Sydney Uni. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 09:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
273740 +++$+++ Aminz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273736 +++$+++ 273739 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.176226860E09 +++$+++ Thanks. -- +++$+++ :::: Thanks. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 10:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

11594 +++$+++ Pepso2 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11594 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-16 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.258432800E09 +++$+++ (a) Over decades, I've always seen the word \"comics\" used interchangeably for both comic books and comic strips. (b) Lank Leonard's art appeared extensively in comic books, and some of those reprints had covers drawn by him as new art specifically for the comic books.  +++$+++ (a) Over decades, I've always seen the word "comics" used interchangeably for both comic books and comic strips. (b) Lank Leonard's art appeared extensively in comic books, and some of those reprints had covers drawn by him as new art specifically for the comic books. [[User:Pepso2|Pepso2]] ([[User talk:Pepso2|talk]]) 20:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
11595 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11594 +++$+++ 11594 +++$+++ 2009-11-16 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.258439220E09 +++$+++ It seems to me that the two categories \"Comic strip cartoonists\" and \"Comic book artists\" were created for this reason, to differentiate the two types of craftspeople. The two fields really are quite different, as are the skills required for both, and simply drawing new covers for collections of reprinted strips doesn't in my mind turn a strip cartoonist into a comic book artist. --  +++$+++ : It seems to me that the two categories "Comic strip cartoonists" and "Comic book artists" were created for this reason, to differentiate the two types of craftspeople. The two fields really are quite different, as are the skills required for both, and simply drawing new covers for collections of reprinted strips doesn't in my mind turn a strip cartoonist into a comic book artist. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 22:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
11596 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11594 +++$+++ 11594 +++$+++ 2009-11-19 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.258632540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your speedy response. So, just to clarify, did DAK ask you to remove the birthdate information? Because [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:BLP#Privacy_of_personal_information Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons] states \"if the subject complains about the publication of his or her date of birth, err on the side of caution and simply list the year of birth.\" Again, since you seem to be a long-serving editor, I'm just curious about your approach to bios of living people. --  +++$+++ : Thanks for your speedy response. So, just to clarify, did DAK ask you to remove the birthdate information? Because [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLP#Privacy_of_personal_information Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons] states "if the subject complains about the publication of his or her date of birth, err on the side of caution and simply list the year of birth." Again, since you seem to be a long-serving editor, I'm just curious about your approach to bios of living people. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 04:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
11597 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11594 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-19 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.258633620E09 +++$+++ 'kay. thx! --  +++$+++ ::: 'kay. thx! -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 04:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

535884 +++$+++ Redux +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.165399320E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge!   +++$+++ Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge!  [[User:Redux|Redux]] 02:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
535885 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535884 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.165399500E09 +++$+++ CONGRATS! - <b> +++$+++ ::CONGRATS! - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|crz]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|crztalk]]</small> 02:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

273741 +++$+++ Aminz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.176227100E09 +++$+++ It is again most probably David. This user has only two edits which are basically personal attacks: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Itaqallah&diff=prev&oldid=121645955], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Nodekeeper&diff=prev&oldid=121645785]. -- +++$+++ It is again most probably David. This user has only two edits which are basically personal attacks: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Itaqallah&diff=prev&oldid=121645955], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nodekeeper&diff=prev&oldid=121645785]. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 10:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
273742 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273741 +++$+++ 273741 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.176321240E09 +++$+++ Damn, beat me to it. :) I couldn't be sure until that NSDAP stuff that it was him.  +++$+++ : Damn, beat me to it. :) I couldn't be sure until that NSDAP stuff that it was him. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 12:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
273743 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273741 +++$+++ 273742 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.176323160E09 +++$+++ Sounds like a plan. Cheers.  +++$+++ :: Sounds like a plan. Cheers. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 13:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

11599 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-28 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.262068440E09 +++$+++ I notice that you added a period to the middle of a sentence in the article about [[George Caragonne]]. Why?  +++$+++ I notice that you added a period to the middle of a sentence in the article about [[George Caragonne]]. Why? [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 22:34, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
11600 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11599 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-28 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.262069160E09 +++$+++ Whoops! Meant that to be a comma. Fixed. --  +++$+++ :: Whoops! Meant that to be a comma. Fixed. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 22:46, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

535889 +++$+++ Alai +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.165453080E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome.  Ironically, I [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship\/Archive_74#Co-nominations|normally rather object to co-nominations]], but since I was unwittingly somewhat pre-empting Grutness in the nominations stakes, I thought it'd be a little harsh to demand he be \"refactored\" as a \"pile-on\". :)   +++$+++ You're very welcome.  Ironically, I [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Archive_74#Co-nominations|normally rather object to co-nominations]], but since I was unwittingly somewhat pre-empting Grutness in the nominations stakes, I thought it'd be a little harsh to demand he be "refactored" as a "pile-on". :)  [[User:Alai|Alai]] 16:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
535890 +++$+++ Alai +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535889 +++$+++ 535889 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.165454520E09 +++$+++ As I say, I can see why G. did it in this case, as evidently he'd originally planned to, but was \"caught on the hop\" when I nominated without reference to him (though I do also disagree with planned co-nominations without reference to the nominee).  And you're right, it says much more about the nominators than about the candidate, which is why it's so hard to address in a proportionate manner.  It's probably not so much a huge concern as a minor irritant;  what provoked much of the debate was I think the weak-but-persistent nature of the counter-arguments (the traditional 'instruction creep' and 'harmless' points, which I rather think are on a par with the *FD \"it's useful and I like it\"; and the likes of Lar's \"all my co-nominations were Completely Vital and Uniquely Telling\" bluster).  But I'm in danger of re-ranting...   +++$+++ :As I say, I can see why G. did it in this case, as evidently he'd originally planned to, but was "caught on the hop" when I nominated without reference to him (though I do also disagree with planned co-nominations without reference to the nominee).  And you're right, it says much more about the nominators than about the candidate, which is why it's so hard to address in a proportionate manner.  It's probably not so much a huge concern as a minor irritant;  what provoked much of the debate was I think the weak-but-persistent nature of the counter-arguments (the traditional 'instruction creep' and 'harmless' points, which I rather think are on a par with the *FD "it's useful and I like it"; and the likes of Lar's "all my co-nominations were Completely Vital and Uniquely Telling" bluster).  But I'm in danger of re-ranting...  [[User:Alai|Alai]] 17:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
535891 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535889 +++$+++ 535890 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.165486800E09 +++$+++ Congratulations Amalas! I know I went neutral on your RfA, but nonetheless, I believe you will make a fine admin on Wikipedia. If you ever need any admin-related help, feel free to contact me. =) ''' +++$+++ ::Congratulations Amalas! I know I went neutral on your RfA, but nonetheless, I believe you will make a fine admin on Wikipedia. If you ever need any admin-related help, feel free to contact me. =) '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 02:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

11602 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-26 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.264540680E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Unsourced BLPs|It's a big job]], but any help you can give would be great.  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Unsourced BLPs|It's a big job]], but any help you can give would be great. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 13:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
11603 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11602 +++$+++ 11602 +++$+++ 2010-01-26 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.264545000E09 +++$+++ Whew! I've been doing a fair amount of that on my own; I'll do what I can. --  +++$+++ : Whew! I've been doing a fair amount of that on my own; I'll do what I can. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 14:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
11604 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11602 +++$+++ 11602 +++$+++ 2010-02-17 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.266407640E09 +++$+++ Okay, so far, I've done [[Dame Darcy]], [[Diane DiMassa]], [[Rich Burchett]], [[Gary Baseman]], [[Dale Messick]], [[Ramona Fradon]], [[June Brigman]], [[Paul Karasik]], [[Michael Kupperman]], [[Greg LaRocque]], [[Aleksandar Zograf]], [[Doug Allen]], and [[Gary Leib]]. Some of them weren't technically Unsourced BLPs \u2014 but they shoukld have been. ;-> --  +++$+++ : Okay, so far, I've done [[Dame Darcy]], [[Diane DiMassa]], [[Rich Burchett]], [[Gary Baseman]], [[Dale Messick]], [[Ramona Fradon]], [[June Brigman]], [[Paul Karasik]], [[Michael Kupperman]], [[Greg LaRocque]], [[Aleksandar Zograf]], [[Doug Allen]], and [[Gary Leib]]. Some of them weren't technically Unsourced BLPs — but they shoukld have been. ;-> -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 03:54, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

273750 +++$+++ Chicken7 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273750 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.176321480E09 +++$+++ Thanx for the help again. I've updated the LGA's section for [[WP:MELB|Wikiproject Melbourne]]. It hasn't gone up much at all. 31% to 40%! I might be wrong though so you can check it if you want.  +++$+++ Thanx for the help again. I've updated the LGA's section for [[WP:MELB|Wikiproject Melbourne]]. It hasn't gone up much at all. 31% to 40%! I might be wrong though so you can check it if you want. [[User:Chicken7|Chicken7]] 12:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
273751 +++$+++ Chicken7 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273750 +++$+++ 273750 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.176322140E09 +++$+++ So tomorrow I'll do as many as I can. I'm going to bed now so I won't reply. And thankyou for trusting me and my maths. :D  +++$+++ :So tomorrow I'll do as many as I can. I'm going to bed now so I won't reply. And thankyou for trusting me and my maths. :D [[User:Chicken7|Chicken7]] 13:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

576503 +++$+++ Dihydrogen Monoxide +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-13 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.208075040E09 +++$+++ MONGO, please reconsider some time in the future. You're too good a person to lose. The RfAr isn't going to be accepted, Tango will stay on, but please, we need, and appreciate, you so much more. Please. '' +++$+++ MONGO, please reconsider some time in the future. You're too good a person to lose. The RfAr isn't going to be accepted, Tango will stay on, but please, we need, and appreciate, you so much more. Please. ''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|dihydrogen monoxide]]'' <small>([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|H<sub>2</sub>O]])</small> 01:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
576504 +++$+++ Sallicio +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576503 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.208075640E09 +++$+++ Perhaps, but his last RfA had over 150 for accept. (BTW, what has Tango staying on have to do with a successful RfA?)-- +++$+++ ::Perhaps, but his last RfA had over 150 for accept. (BTW, what has Tango staying on have to do with a successful RfA?)--[[User:Sallicio|Sallicio]][[User talk:Sallicio|<sup><math>\color{Red} \oplus</math></sup>]] 01:34, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

11608 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11608 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-16 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.279267920E09 +++$+++ Nice add with quote at [[Bill Sienkiewicz]]. Good background. -- +++$+++ Nice add with quote at [[Bill Sienkiewicz]]. Good background. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 01:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
11609 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11608 +++$+++ 11608 +++$+++ 2010-07-18 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.279437480E09 +++$+++ Thank you, sir! I'd been looking for something like that for a while --  +++$+++ : Thank you, sir! I'd been looking for something like that for a while -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 00:18, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
11610 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11608 +++$+++ 11608 +++$+++ 2010-08-24 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.282691400E09 +++$+++ Hey Jonathan, I would think there'd be no problem in you scanning and uploading the original page, and even posting thumbnail of it on the Tarantula page. (You could explain its relevance - that it's the first recorded depiction of the character \u2014 in the caption.) When you upload it, just make sure to select the option \"A cover or other page from a book, DVD, newspaper, magazine, or other such source\", and under licensing use the option \"comic book stuff.\" And then do your best to fill out the other descriptive fields. Hope this helps. --  +++$+++ : Hey Jonathan, I would think there'd be no problem in you scanning and uploading the original page, and even posting thumbnail of it on the Tarantula page. (You could explain its relevance - that it's the first recorded depiction of the character — in the caption.) When you upload it, just make sure to select the option "A cover or other page from a book, DVD, newspaper, magazine, or other such source", and under licensing use the option "comic book stuff." And then do your best to fill out the other descriptive fields. Hope this helps. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 16:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

273753 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.176356400E09 +++$+++ Can I please come to you with a direct request?  I've been trying to clear up one (a little more unusual) speedy delete which refers to these two articles [[User:Verisimilus\/Ediacara]] and [[Ediacaran biota]].  The original author Verisimilus used the first page as a sandbox and each time he adjusted he transferred material over to the actual article.  The sandbox article needs a history merge and then deletion I believe. I have spoken to him and he has deleted content at the sandbox version and placed a request on that page for history merge to occur.-- +++$+++ Can I please come to you with a direct request?  I've been trying to clear up one (a little more unusual) speedy delete which refers to these two articles [[User:Verisimilus/Ediacara]] and [[Ediacaran biota]].  The original author Verisimilus used the first page as a sandbox and each time he adjusted he transferred material over to the actual article.  The sandbox article needs a history merge and then deletion I believe. I have spoken to him and he has deleted content at the sandbox version and placed a request on that page for history merge to occur.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 22:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
273754 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273753 +++$+++ 273753 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.176359820E09 +++$+++ Okay, I've done it Steve. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Okay, I've done it Steve. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 23:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
273755 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273753 +++$+++ 273754 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.176360540E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah.  Just as you were merging I got a message from Golden Wattle - and responded at my talk page. I'm not sure if it changes anything but perhaps if you have a look? Hope you have a lovely day doing whatever you do when you are not doing Wiki.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks Sarah.  Just as you were merging I got a message from Golden Wattle - and responded at my talk page. I'm not sure if it changes anything but perhaps if you have a look? Hope you have a lovely day doing whatever you do when you are not doing Wiki.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 23:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

11611 +++$+++ Jonathanlevey +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-22 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.282541400E09 +++$+++ Since you are obviously very knowledgeable, Stoshmaster, in the area of Golden Age Comics, I would welcome your thoughtful and constructive input and editing skills in regard to the article on [[Harris Levey]], DC comic artist for the original Air Wave. I am really a novice with Wiki and since I am close to the subject, I worked very hard with the guidance of skilled Wiki Editors, to avoid COI and keep the article objective.  Still I know it could use lots of improvement and much more in the way of posting verifiable sources and citations. Many thanks for your consideration.  +++$+++ Since you are obviously very knowledgeable, Stoshmaster, in the area of Golden Age Comics, I would welcome your thoughtful and constructive input and editing skills in regard to the article on [[Harris Levey]], DC comic artist for the original Air Wave. I am really a novice with Wiki and since I am close to the subject, I worked very hard with the guidance of skilled Wiki Editors, to avoid COI and keep the article objective.  Still I know it could use lots of improvement and much more in the way of posting verifiable sources and citations. Many thanks for your consideration. [[User:Jonathanlevey|Jonathan Levey]] ([[User talk:Jonathanlevey|talk]]) 22:30, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
11612 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11611 +++$+++ 11611 +++$+++ 2010-08-24 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.282691400E09 +++$+++ The Levey article seems very good to me. As you say, it just needs more outside references to back up certain factual observations. I assume you're a relative? Unfortunately, as I'm sure you know, Wikipedia frowns on \"original research\", even by family members, unless they can back it up with verifiable sources and citations. I will make an effort when I can to find more sources for Mr. Levey. In the meantime, a couple of good sources you may want to explore include [http:\/\/comics.lib.msu.edu\/rri\/index.htm The Reading Room Index: an Index to the Holdings of the Michigan State University Libraries Comic Art Collection] and [http:\/\/www.bailsprojects.com Who's Who of American Comic Books, 1928\u20131999], both of which are considered trustworthy sources. Hope that's helpful. --  +++$+++ : The Levey article seems very good to me. As you say, it just needs more outside references to back up certain factual observations. I assume you're a relative? Unfortunately, as I'm sure you know, Wikipedia frowns on "original research", even by family members, unless they can back it up with verifiable sources and citations. I will make an effort when I can to find more sources for Mr. Levey. In the meantime, a couple of good sources you may want to explore include [http://comics.lib.msu.edu/rri/index.htm The Reading Room Index: an Index to the Holdings of the Michigan State University Libraries Comic Art Collection] and [http://www.bailsprojects.com Who's Who of American Comic Books, 1928–1999], both of which are considered trustworthy sources. Hope that's helpful. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 16:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

273756 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-12 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.176364560E09 +++$+++ Hey Sarah, are you a member of WP:Oz? Thanks  +++$+++ Hey Sarah, are you a member of WP:Oz? Thanks [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 00:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
273757 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273756 +++$+++ 273756 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.176377100E09 +++$+++ I was wondering because VS and I were wondering wether it would be a good idea to put up some advertisments on qxz-ads. I consulted VS about it and he said I should place a note on the WP:AUS talk page. I have but I was wondering wether you thought it was a good idea as well? Also, thanks for complementing my user page.  +++$+++ *I was wondering because VS and I were wondering wether it would be a good idea to put up some advertisments on qxz-ads. I consulted VS about it and he said I should place a note on the WP:AUS talk page. I have but I was wondering wether you thought it was a good idea as well? Also, thanks for complementing my user page. [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 04:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
273758 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273756 +++$+++ 273756 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.176380700E09 +++$+++ In case you were wondering Gurch is no longer active. [[AzaToth]] is the one that creates them now. Also I am not sure what Virtual Steve would say if I did, because he told me to ask other members first.  +++$+++ *In case you were wondering Gurch is no longer active. [[AzaToth]] is the one that creates them now. Also I am not sure what Virtual Steve would say if I did, because he told me to ask other members first. [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 05:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

45626 +++$+++ Mike_Searson +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-04 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.299227460E09 +++$+++ I made a copy edit to help you get this piece ready for FAC.  What a well-written article.  I had never heard of [[Mangalorean Catholics]] before, I learned a lot from reading and copyediting this one!  I think it is all in American English, now.  Good luck!-- +++$+++ I made a copy edit to help you get this piece ready for FAC.  What a well-written article.  I had never heard of [[Mangalorean Catholics]] before, I learned a lot from reading and copyediting this one!  I think it is all in American English, now.  Good luck!--[[User:Mike Searson|'''Mike''']] - [[User_talk:Mike_Searson|'''Μολὼν λαβέ''']] 00:31, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
45627 +++$+++ Joyson Noel  +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45626 +++$+++ 45626 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.299260940E09 +++$+++ Thanks a million, dude. Cheers!  +++$+++ : Thanks a million, dude. Cheers! [[User:Joyson Noel |<big><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000">Joyson Noel</FONT></big>]][[User talk:Joyson Noel |<small><sup><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000"> Holla at me!</FONT></sup></small>]] 09:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

11616 +++$+++ Mtminchi08 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11616 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-19 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.292769840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Mtminchi08|Mtminchi08]] ([[User talk:Mtminchi08|talk]]) 06:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
11617 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11616 +++$+++ 11616 +++$+++ 2010-12-28 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.293582600E09 +++$+++ Hey, there, nice job of expanding that article. Overall, I would try to avoid over-using Grand Comics Database as a reference (since it is also an amateur user-driven resource), but many of your other citations are very good. Kudos. --  +++$+++ : Hey, there, nice job of expanding that article. Overall, I would try to avoid over-using Grand Comics Database as a reference (since it is also an amateur user-driven resource), but many of your other citations are very good. Kudos. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 16:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

11618 +++$+++ Mtminchi08 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-31 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.293799080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Mtminchi08|Mtminchi08]] ([[User talk:Mtminchi08|talk]]) 04:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
11619 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11618 +++$+++ 11618 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.295429280E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  01:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

273764 +++$+++ Aminz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.176219240E09 +++$+++ P.S. I'll try to see find diffs of David's incivil comments\/disruptive behavior. Cheers, -- +++$+++ P.S. I'll try to see find diffs of David's incivil comments/disruptive behavior. Cheers, --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 08:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
273765 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273764 +++$+++ 273764 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.176320700E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. Do we have a policy on how to report possible David York socks? I think [[User:Gutlessnesslessness]] could be David.  +++$+++ :Hi Sarah. Do we have a policy on how to report possible David York socks? I think [[User:Gutlessnesslessness]] could be David. [[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 12:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
273766 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273764 +++$+++ 273765 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.176321600E09 +++$+++ No, there's no policy for dealing with his socks. People have just been posting here and I've been blocking. I think we need to get a community ban proposal underway. I've been meaning to get one started but have been too busy with other stuff. ''' +++$+++ ::No, there's no policy for dealing with his socks. People have just been posting here and I've been blocking. I think we need to get a community ban proposal underway. I've been meaning to get one started but have been too busy with other stuff. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 13:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

11621 +++$+++ JasonAQuest +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-29 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.301441100E09 +++$+++ Are you sure that \"gay artist\" is an appropriate category for [[Barry Blair]]?  WP policy indicates that categories such that should only be used when there is \"a verified general consensus of reliable published sources that the description is appropriate\", and I haven't seen that about Blair.  While I have little doubt that his sexuality didn't conform to mainstream heterosexuality, I'm not sure we can label it objectively. - +++$+++ Are you sure that "gay artist" is an appropriate category for [[Barry Blair]]?  WP policy indicates that categories such that should only be used when there is "a verified general consensus of reliable published sources that the description is appropriate", and I haven't seen that about Blair.  While I have little doubt that his sexuality didn't conform to mainstream heterosexuality, I'm not sure we can label it objectively. -[[User:JasonAQuest|Jason A. Quest]] ([[User talk:JasonAQuest|talk]]) 16:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
11622 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11621 +++$+++ 11621 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.301441460E09 +++$+++ Your call. I based it on multiple reports that he and Colin Walbridge (aka Colin Chain) were lovers\/partners (not to mention all the unsourced innuendo about him and the young Dave Cooper, which for obvious reasons I did not include in the article). But if you object, go ahead and remove that cat tag. --  +++$+++ : Your call. I based it on multiple reports that he and Colin Walbridge (aka Colin Chain) were lovers/partners (not to mention all the unsourced innuendo about him and the young Dave Cooper, which for obvious reasons I did not include in the article). But if you object, go ahead and remove that cat tag. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 16:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
11623 +++$+++ JasonAQuest +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11621 +++$+++ 11622 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.301447100E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't mind it being there, but I figure it's the difference between what we know vs. what we can prove. - +++$+++ ::I wouldn't mind it being there, but I figure it's the difference between what we know vs. what we can prove. -[[User:JasonAQuest|Jason A. Quest]] ([[User talk:JasonAQuest|talk]]) 18:05, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

45628 +++$+++ ImperiumCaelestis +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-07 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.299560760E09 +++$+++ thanks for the helpful tips message. godspeed !!  +++$+++ thanks for the helpful tips message. godspeed !! [[User:ImperiumCaelestis|<font color="#FFA500">Imp</font><font color="#C0C0C0">er</font><font color="#008000">ium</font>]]<sup> [[User talk:ImperiumCaelestis|<font color="#0000FF">Caelestis</font> </sup>]] 21:06, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
45629 +++$+++ Joyson Noel  +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45628 +++$+++ 45628 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.299561240E09 +++$+++ Always glad to help a fellow Konkani lover! :-)  +++$+++ : Always glad to help a fellow Konkani lover! :-) [[User:Joyson Noel |<big><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000">Joyson Noel</FONT></big>]][[User talk:Joyson Noel |<small><sup><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000"> Holla at me!</FONT></sup></small>]] 21:14, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

528281 +++$+++ Alandavidson +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528281 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-23 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.195851660E09 +++$+++ I notice this page was recently deleted. I spent quite some time on this page. I notice that someone else put on the actual rules (the UCP) breaching copyright.  However, instead of removing the rules, the entire page was deleted. Could it please be reinstated (without the rules)? It is an article on an important set of rules that governs more than one trillion dollars of trade annually.  +++$+++ I notice this page was recently deleted. I spent quite some time on this page. I notice that someone else put on the actual rules (the UCP) breaching copyright.  However, instead of removing the rules, the entire page was deleted. Could it please be reinstated (without the rules)? It is an article on an important set of rules that governs more than one trillion dollars of trade annually. [[User:Alandavidson|Alan Davidson]] ([[User talk:Alandavidson|talk]]) 13:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
528282 +++$+++ Alandavidson +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528281 +++$+++ 528281 +++$+++ 2007-12-01 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.196499120E09 +++$+++ Hi again.  I am writing to you because your user name appears on the page.  Are you the correct person to approach in this regard? If not can you tell me who?  +++$+++ : Hi again.  I am writing to you because your user name appears on the page.  Are you the correct person to approach in this regard? If not can you tell me who? [[User:Alandavidson|Alan Davidson]] 00:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

11628 +++$+++ 82.110.160.178 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-06 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.307401080E09 +++$+++ I must say that I'm rather impressed by the new page you've set up on [[Spider-Man Comics Weekly|Spiderman Comics Weekly]]. The justification for the Spider-Man and Captain Britain story appearing in the US first is well put, I know fans have argued over that one for years (personally I suspect it was designed to be used both in MTU and SSM&CB). No doubt I'll be contributing to this fine page myself at some point - thanks for creating it.[[Special:Contributions\/82.110.160.178|82.110.160.178]] ( +++$+++ I must say that I'm rather impressed by the new page you've set up on [[Spider-Man Comics Weekly|Spiderman Comics Weekly]]. The justification for the Spider-Man and Captain Britain story appearing in the US first is well put, I know fans have argued over that one for years (personally I suspect it was designed to be used both in MTU and SSM&CB). No doubt I'll be contributing to this fine page myself at some point - thanks for creating it.[[Special:Contributions/82.110.160.178|82.110.160.178]] ([[User talk:82.110.160.178|talk]]) 15:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
11629 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11628 +++$+++ 11628 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.307402700E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I look forward to you adding to the still-nascent page. --  +++$+++ : Thanks! I look forward to you adding to the still-nascent page. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 16:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

11630 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11630 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-06 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.307424240E09 +++$+++ Been wanting to compliment you on your Charlton-articles work; it gets lonely sometimes with some of these non-Marvel\/DC Silver Age comics! That radio-show cite at Willy Schultz was a great fine. Kudos, Stosh! -- +++$+++ Been wanting to compliment you on your Charlton-articles work; it gets lonely sometimes with some of these non-Marvel/DC Silver Age comics! That radio-show cite at Willy Schultz was a great fine. Kudos, Stosh! --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 22:24, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
11631 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11630 +++$+++ 11630 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.307424480E09 +++$+++ Thank you, sir! I was really psyched when I came across it, because it gave the Willy Schultz stuff such context. P.S. I moved the Devil's Brigade material (formerly on the Willy Schultz page) to the [[Will Franz]] article, which I just posted today. --  +++$+++ : Thank you, sir! I was really psyched when I came across it, because it gave the Willy Schultz stuff such context. P.S. I moved the Devil's Brigade material (formerly on the Willy Schultz page) to the [[Will Franz]] article, which I just posted today. -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 22:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
11632 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11630 +++$+++ 11631 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.307424960E09 +++$+++ And may I say what a brilliant catch that was on the cover misspelling! -- +++$+++ ::And may I say what a brilliant catch that was on the cover misspelling! --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 22:36, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
11633 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11630 +++$+++ 11632 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.307486700E09 +++$+++ You are de man with those FCB refs! Wow, so you have all the actual comics ... so cool. Geez, I wonder who has the rights to them? I'd love to see these stories collected in a hardcover volume. -- +++$+++ :::You are de man with those FCB refs! Wow, so you have all the actual comics ... so cool. Geez, I wonder who has the rights to them? I'd love to see these stories collected in a hardcover volume. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 15:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
11634 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11630 +++$+++ 11633 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310156160E09 +++$+++ I feel like the head of your fan club! Nice (and lord knows time-consuming, manual) work on pointing links from Western fiction to Western comics &mdash; I had no idea that article existed, though I well should have. Kudos, Mr. S! -- +++$+++ ::::I feel like the head of your fan club! Nice (and lord knows time-consuming, manual) work on pointing links from Western fiction to Western comics &mdash; I had no idea that article existed, though I well should have. Kudos, Mr. S! --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 13:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
11635 +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ Stoshmaster +++$+++ 11630 +++$+++ 11634 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.310157180E09 +++$+++ Hee hee, that's 'cause just I just wrote it. Thx --  +++$+++ ::::: Hee hee, that's 'cause just I just wrote it. Thx -- [[User:Stoshmaster|stoshmaster]] ([[User talk:Stoshmaster#top|talk]]) 13:33, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

535923 +++$+++ Fred.e +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-13 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.168732920E09 +++$+++ Please reconsider your attention to emerging and new stubs and categories in Western Australia. These are being developed by energetic wikiprojects in WA with experienced editors (and admins if that means anything). Please read the comment and protest carefully and look into the extensive discussion surrounding them. Rest assured, redundancy are being reduced at the projects.  There can be no merit in unworthy nominations. These would be beyond your scope of deletion nominations, I'm certain. Your reply would be appreciated.  Yours faithfully   +++$+++ Please reconsider your attention to emerging and new stubs and categories in Western Australia. These are being developed by energetic wikiprojects in WA with experienced editors (and admins if that means anything). Please read the comment and protest carefully and look into the extensive discussion surrounding them. Rest assured, redundancy are being reduced at the projects.  There can be no merit in unworthy nominations. These would be beyond your scope of deletion nominations, I'm certain. Your reply would be appreciated.  Yours faithfully  [[User talk:Fred.e|Fred]] 16:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
535924 +++$+++ Fred.e +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535923 +++$+++ 535923 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.169251140E09 +++$+++ I am a little put out that you have not taken a moment to respond to my comments. I am fairly new around here and largely unaware of the forms of governance on wikipedia. Is it a case of no correspondence will be entered into? Perhaps a standard response to pests like me would be more in keeping with the wikipedia culture. Are you self appointed? What forms of review of take place? Your statements seems to imply that you, as an individual, have the authority to make decisions.  I had thought the decision was being made below your introductory comment and that your role was to mediate this.  Please reply to my possibly naive or erroneous interpretation of this process, or direct me to relevant guidelines.  Faithfully    +++$+++ :I am a little put out that you have not taken a moment to respond to my comments. I am fairly new around here and largely unaware of the forms of governance on wikipedia. Is it a case of no correspondence will be entered into? Perhaps a standard response to pests like me would be more in keeping with the wikipedia culture. Are you self appointed? What forms of review of take place? Your statements seems to imply that you, as an individual, have the authority to make decisions.  I had thought the decision was being made below your introductory comment and that your role was to mediate this.  Please reply to my possibly naive or erroneous interpretation of this process, or direct me to relevant guidelines.  Faithfully   [[User talk:Fred.e|Fred]] 15:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
535925 +++$+++ Fred.e +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535923 +++$+++ 535924 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.169318340E09 +++$+++ \"If there's a bona fide WikiProject involved, the proposal pretty much always gets approved. This is one of those cases where it's better to ask permission than to ask forgiveness.\" and other statements help to clarify your position, thankyou. Despite my failure to state the question in terms you understand, you have more than adequately answered it. You are obviously a very bright person and perhaps your nominations generally have merit. Our community was forced to defend its own work from an individual. In my opinion this is an unacceptable situation.  In this instance you have wasted a lot of editors time away from more enjoyable activities on wikipedia.   +++$+++ ::"If there's a bona fide WikiProject involved, the proposal pretty much always gets approved. This is one of those cases where it's better to ask permission than to ask forgiveness." and other statements help to clarify your position, thankyou. Despite my failure to state the question in terms you understand, you have more than adequately answered it. You are obviously a very bright person and perhaps your nominations generally have merit. Our community was forced to defend its own work from an individual. In my opinion this is an unacceptable situation.  In this instance you have wasted a lot of editors time away from more enjoyable activities on wikipedia.  [[User talk:Fred.e|Fred]] 10:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

273780 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273780 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.176889620E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Motto of the day\/Nominations|Have a look at this.]] (Mine is the 'You Can Do It!' one). Do you think it is Motto of the Day Material? If you do could you support it for me but if you don't I want you to oppose it. Thanks  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations|Have a look at this.]] (Mine is the 'You Can Do It!' one). Do you think it is Motto of the Day Material? If you do could you support it for me but if you don't I want you to oppose it. Thanks [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 02:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
273781 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273780 +++$+++ 273780 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.176912120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the support Sarah. Have you seen my DYK that I co-written with Steve? Thanks  +++$+++ *Thanks for the support Sarah. Have you seen my DYK that I co-written with Steve? Thanks [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 09:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

438846 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ Wernher +++$+++ 438846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-08 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.134053880E09 +++$+++ Noticed your edit to [[Window (disambiguation)]]. Just thought I'd let you know that piping and excess wikilinks do not go on disambiguation pages. [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)]] has more information, and I'm always happy to discuss disambiguation.-- +++$+++ Noticed your edit to [[Window (disambiguation)]]. Just thought I'd let you know that piping and excess wikilinks do not go on disambiguation pages. [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)]] has more information, and I'm always happy to discuss disambiguation.--[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] 06:58, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
438847 +++$+++ Wernher +++$+++ Wernher +++$+++ 438846 +++$+++ 438846 +++$+++ 2005-12-09 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.134115320E09 +++$+++ No problemo. And after the recent edits, the page looks much more tidy! :) -- +++$+++ :No problemo. And after the recent edits, the page looks much more tidy! :) --[[User:Wernher|Wernher]] 00:02, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

567775 +++$+++  +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567775 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.194426780E09 +++$+++ Do you think this talk page should be semi-protected?-- +++$+++ Do you think this talk page should be semi-protected?--[[User:U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A.|U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A.]] [[Special:Deletedcontributions/U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A.|deleted contribs]] 01:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
567776 +++$+++  +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567775 +++$+++ 567775 +++$+++ 2007-11-07 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.194427740E09 +++$+++ Looks like this IP is using sockpuppets to evade the block, such as [[User:4.130.138.13]]-- +++$+++ :Looks like this IP is using sockpuppets to evade the block, such as [[User:4.130.138.13]]--[[User:U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A.|U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A.]] [[Special:Deletedcontributions/U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A.|deleted contribs]] 01:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

535930 +++$+++ Orderinchaos78 +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-19 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.169248860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for closing that one - the consensus reached appears to be broadly acceptable as it means we can include roads in other cities in the new stub cat. I've edited the content of the stub to read \"This Western Australian...\", but I didn't want to touch anything else in case I foiled some standard system to deal with such things :)  +++$+++ Thanks for closing that one - the consensus reached appears to be broadly acceptable as it means we can include roads in other cities in the new stub cat. I've edited the content of the stub to read "This Western Australian...", but I didn't want to touch anything else in case I foiled some standard system to deal with such things :) [[User talk:Orderinchaos78|Orderinchaos78]] 15:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
535931 +++$+++ Fred.e +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535930 +++$+++ 535930 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.169251380E09 +++$+++ Another comment at section 'stubs, what else'. Ta,  +++$+++ :Another comment at section 'stubs, what else'. Ta, [[User talk:Fred.e|Fred]] 16:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

273787 +++$+++ King_Lopez +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-17 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.176824040E09 +++$+++ <\/font><\/big><sup><small> +++$+++ </font></big><sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/King_Lopez|<font color=#FF0000>'''Contribs''']]</sup></small> 08:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
273788 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273787 +++$+++ 273787 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.176824280E09 +++$+++ No, I'm not related to Riana. ''' +++$+++ :No, I'm not related to Riana. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 08:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

11645 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-31 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.283280120E09 +++$+++ Hello, please do not add indiscriminate details to [[Fight Club (film)]] as you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fight_Club_%28film%29&action=historysubmit&diff=382041162&oldid=381994669 here]. The film infobox does not contain every single production company involved, only the major ones. In addition, ''Fight Club'' is primarily an American film because of its American studio; any German relationship it may have is very minimal. Thanks, Erik ( +++$+++ Hello, please do not add indiscriminate details to [[Fight Club (film)]] as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fight_Club_%28film%29&action=historysubmit&diff=382041162&oldid=381994669 here]. The film infobox does not contain every single production company involved, only the major ones. In addition, ''Fight Club'' is primarily an American film because of its American studio; any German relationship it may have is very minimal. Thanks, Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 11:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
11646 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11645 +++$+++ 11645 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.283280300E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in [[:Fight Club (film)]]. There is a [[Wikipedia:MOS|Manual of Style]] that should be followed. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-mos2 --> Erik ( +++$+++ :[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in [[:Fight Club (film)]]. There is a [[Wikipedia:MOS|Manual of Style]] that should be followed. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-mos2 --> Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 11:45, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
11647 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11645 +++$+++ 11646 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.283280660E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions\/Arbero|your contributions]] to [[Wikipedia:About|Wikipedia]]. When you make a change to an article, please provide an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]], which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to [[Fight Club (film)]]. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> Erik ( +++$+++ ::[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Arbero|your contributions]] to [[Wikipedia:About|Wikipedia]]. When you make a change to an article, please provide an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]], which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to [[Fight Club (film)]]. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 11:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
11648 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11645 +++$+++ 11647 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.283280960E09 +++$+++ Please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do when you edited [[Jurassic Park III]]. Thank you. Erik ( +++$+++ :::Please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do when you edited [[Jurassic Park III]]. Thank you. Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 11:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

273790 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-21 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.177169220E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I am celebrating my 1000th edit!  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I am celebrating my 1000th edit! [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 08:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
273791 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273790 +++$+++ 273790 +++$+++ 2007-04-21 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.177174860E09 +++$+++ Thankyou so much for the awards. I am so happy that how much I have achieved in only a couple of months. Also, have you seen my userpage? I have done alot of work on it and I am at a state where I am happy with it. Thankyou  +++$+++ *Thankyou so much for the awards. I am so happy that how much I have achieved in only a couple of months. Also, have you seen my userpage? I have done alot of work on it and I am at a state where I am happy with it. Thankyou [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 10:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

11649 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-31 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.283292960E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Confessions_of_a_Dangerous_Mind&diff=prev&oldid=382066319 this], please see my similar notification about ''Fight Club''. The \"studio\" field should not list all production companies indiscriminately; the film infobox is intended to be a summary of the film. In the case of ''Confessions of a Dangerous Mind'', Miramax Films is the primary studio. The assisting production companies are of little value in the infobox. If they contributed to the film in a big way, it should be detailed in the article body. Erik ( +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Confessions_of_a_Dangerous_Mind&diff=prev&oldid=382066319 this], please see my similar notification about ''Fight Club''. The "studio" field should not list all production companies indiscriminately; the film infobox is intended to be a summary of the film. In the case of ''Confessions of a Dangerous Mind'', Miramax Films is the primary studio. The assisting production companies are of little value in the infobox. If they contributed to the film in a big way, it should be detailed in the article body. Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 15:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
11650 +++$+++  +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11649 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ OK, I will try not to. Arbero 17:37, 31 August 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ ::OK, I will try not to. Arbero 17:37, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
11651 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11649 +++$+++ 11649 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.283293260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for using edit summaries, by the way! :) Erik ( +++$+++ :Thanks for using edit summaries, by the way! :) Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 15:21, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
11652 +++$+++  +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11649 +++$+++ 11651 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Sorry, I'm just lazy sometimes. Thanks for the heads-up! Arbero 17:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ ::Sorry, I'm just lazy sometimes. Thanks for the heads-up! Arbero 17:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
11653 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11649 +++$+++ 11652 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.283295600E09 +++$+++ Understandable! If you are interested in film articles, you may want to check out [[WP:FILM|WikiProject Films]] and its guidelines for film articles [[MOS:FILM|here]]. We also have numerous discussions on [[WT:FILM|the WikiProject's talk page]]. Regards, Erik ( +++$+++ :::Understandable! If you are interested in film articles, you may want to check out [[WP:FILM|WikiProject Films]] and its guidelines for film articles [[MOS:FILM|here]]. We also have numerous discussions on [[WT:FILM|the WikiProject's talk page]]. Regards, Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 16:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
11654 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11649 +++$+++ 11649 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.283298720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply my friend. Hey, no hard feelings, \"whistle\" if\/when you have any doubts, i'll help you if i can :). Take care - -- +++$+++ *Thanks for the reply my friend. Hey, no hard feelings, "whistle" if/when you have any doubts, i'll help you if i can :). Take care - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 16:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

273795 +++$+++ Blueboy96 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-22 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.177236660E09 +++$+++ Looking at this troll's history, it might be a good idea to report him to his ISP as well.  If I'm not mistaken, a lot of what he's done would violate his ISP's TOS as well.  I could be wrong here--most American ISPs require you to abide by the policies of third-party sites as well.  Anything to pull the thread from his socks ... +++$+++ Looking at this troll's history, it might be a good idea to report him to his ISP as well.  If I'm not mistaken, a lot of what he's done would violate his ISP's TOS as well.  I could be wrong here--most American ISPs require you to abide by the policies of third-party sites as well.  Anything to pull the thread from his socks ...[[User:Blueboy96|Blueboy96]] 03:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
273796 +++$+++ Blueboy96 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273795 +++$+++ 273795 +++$+++ 2007-04-23 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.177379340E09 +++$+++ It might be because Telstra's [http:\/\/www.telstra.com.au\/internetdirect\/aup.htm AUP] doesn't specifically require you to abide by the terms of third-party sites.  Most ISPs here in the States have a clause to that effect.  It's too bad ... would make it a lot easier to put him out to pasture, and permanently.  +++$+++ :It might be because Telstra's [http://www.telstra.com.au/internetdirect/aup.htm AUP] doesn't specifically require you to abide by the terms of third-party sites.  Most ISPs here in the States have a clause to that effect.  It's too bad ... would make it a lot easier to put him out to pasture, and permanently. [[User:Blueboy96|Blueboy96]] 18:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

273798 +++$+++ Cmurphy au +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-23 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.177346940E09 +++$+++ Sarah thankyou for your response - I apologise for not noticing the distinction between girls primary and secondary - it clearly does belong there in that case. I also apologise for my oversight in not signing my comment. [[User:Cmurphy au|Cmurphy au]] 09:00, 23 April 2007 (UTC) PS: one reason that I missed your reference to be the oldest girls '''Primary''' school was because the school website (''and indeed your earlier edit'') that you link to as evidence for your statement falsely claims that Ormiston '''is''' the oldest girls school on the mainland. This highlights why school websites should be used with care. I have found many schools that make claims like this on their websites which are incorrect. ''For example: The Kings School often claims to be the oldest school in Australia - it isn't. Launceston Church Grammar School claims to be the oldest continuously operating school - it isnt.''  [[User:Cmurphy au|Cmurphy au]] 09:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC) PPS: thanks for your message! I know what night shift nursing can do to a person! My partner is a former DON and is a nurse educator :-). May I ask what your interest in education is - or were your changes just because you were administrating. I only became involved because the article on Scotch College (and yes its website too!) claims its the oldest school in victoria and I knew that was wrong because my children went to St Mary's and its started on its present site 10 years before Scotch was founded. I have since found multitude of similar claims and mistakes not just on wikipedia but on school websites. I even visited a school in NSW that has a big plaque out the front saying its the oldest catholic school in australia the only problem being that three other schools started 10 years before it.  [[User:Cmurphy au|Cmurphy au]] 09:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC) I'll leave it in - I think it fits ok and having the oldest irls primary school reinforces the message of mebourne having a long tradition in education. I agree with you about the bullying thing by the way my daughter has just moved schools crossing the road from the actual oldest school in victoria to the heritage listed one that claims to be the oldest school in Williamstown. But not because of their false claims but because they introduced ani-bullying programs that have been taken up across the naion like buddy bears and their  \"Willy kids are friendly kids\" program.  +++$+++ Sarah thankyou for your response - I apologise for not noticing the distinction between girls primary and secondary - it clearly does belong there in that case. I also apologise for my oversight in not signing my comment. [[User:Cmurphy au|Cmurphy au]] 09:00, 23 April 2007 (UTC) PS: one reason that I missed your reference to be the oldest girls '''Primary''' school was because the school website (''and indeed your earlier edit'') that you link to as evidence for your statement falsely claims that Ormiston '''is''' the oldest girls school on the mainland. This highlights why school websites should be used with care. I have found many schools that make claims like this on their websites which are incorrect. ''For example: The Kings School often claims to be the oldest school in Australia - it isn't. Launceston Church Grammar School claims to be the oldest continuously operating school - it isnt.''  [[User:Cmurphy au|Cmurphy au]] 09:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC) PPS: thanks for your message! I know what night shift nursing can do to a person! My partner is a former DON and is a nurse educator :-). May I ask what your interest in education is - or were your changes just because you were administrating. I only became involved because the article on Scotch College (and yes its website too!) claims its the oldest school in victoria and I knew that was wrong because my children went to St Mary's and its started on its present site 10 years before Scotch was founded. I have since found multitude of similar claims and mistakes not just on wikipedia but on school websites. I even visited a school in NSW that has a big plaque out the front saying its the oldest catholic school in australia the only problem being that three other schools started 10 years before it.  [[User:Cmurphy au|Cmurphy au]] 09:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC) I'll leave it in - I think it fits ok and having the oldest irls primary school reinforces the message of mebourne having a long tradition in education. I agree with you about the bullying thing by the way my daughter has just moved schools crossing the road from the actual oldest school in victoria to the heritage listed one that claims to be the oldest school in Williamstown. But not because of their false claims but because they introduced ani-bullying programs that have been taken up across the naion like buddy bears and their  "Willy kids are friendly kids" program. [[User:Cmurphy au|Cmurphy au]] 09:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
273799 +++$+++ Ssbohio +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273798 +++$+++ 273798 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.177543440E09 +++$+++ Everyone has a say in the consensus-building process, but no one has a greater say than anyone else.  If you'd like to have a page where you can exercise your own judgment over what appears there, please consider editing [[User:JustinBerry|your userpage]], which, within broad limits, can contain what content you see fit.  Also, please consider signing your talk page comments (like the one above) by typing <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>, which adds your username and the date & time of your comment.  If I can be of any assistance, please let me know.  -- +++$+++ :Everyone has a say in the consensus-building process, but no one has a greater say than anyone else.  If you'd like to have a page where you can exercise your own judgment over what appears there, please consider editing [[User:JustinBerry|your userpage]], which, within broad limits, can contain what content you see fit.  Also, please consider signing your talk page comments (like the one above) by typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, which adds your username and the date & time of your comment.  If I can be of any assistance, please let me know.  --[[User:Ssbohio|Ssbohio]] 16:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

11655 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-14 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.284520800E09 +++$+++ FYI, for [[Black Swan (film)]], [[MOS:IMAGES]] says, \"It is often preferable to place images of faces so that the face or eyes look toward the text. Multiple images in the same article can be staggered right-and-left.\" The placement of the promo image of Portman accomplishes both of these. If you're concerned about the heading runover, I don't think it's an issue. Erik ( +++$+++ FYI, for [[Black Swan (film)]], [[MOS:IMAGES]] says, "It is often preferable to place images of faces so that the face or eyes look toward the text. Multiple images in the same article can be staggered right-and-left." The placement of the promo image of Portman accomplishes both of these. If you're concerned about the heading runover, I don't think it's an issue. Erik ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 20:20, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
11656 +++$+++  +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11655 +++$+++ 11655 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks for reminding me! Arbero 20:23, 14 September 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ :Thanks for reminding me! Arbero 20:23, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

273800 +++$+++ Chicken7 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273800 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-25 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.177505100E09 +++$+++ Happy Anzac Day Sarah!!  +++$+++ Happy Anzac Day Sarah!! [[User:Chicken7|Chicken7]] 05:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
273801 +++$+++ Chicken7 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273800 +++$+++ 273800 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.177509540E09 +++$+++ I'm going to walk Pugsley now. I hope Collingwood wins. 84-77 last time I looked. I'm going to [[Sovereign Hill]]at Ballarat tommorow with school. I'll get some photos for Wikipedia. Thanks for the compliments aswell. Cheers  +++$+++ :I'm going to walk Pugsley now. I hope Collingwood wins. 84-77 last time I looked. I'm going to [[Sovereign Hill]]at Ballarat tommorow with school. I'll get some photos for Wikipedia. Thanks for the compliments aswell. Cheers [[User:Chicken7|Chicken7]] 06:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

11657 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-13 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.284434580E09 +++$+++ Hey Arbero, and thanks for your edits to the ITFC article.  I'm a keen fan of the club, and was one of the primary editors to get the article to [[WP:FA|featured]] status.  I noticed that most of your edits have been excellent, and just wanted to let you know that I'd sort-of reverted one of them, where I made it clear the club was an [[association football]] club, rather than just a [[football club]].  In any case, it's not a big deal, I just wanted this to be clear to an international audience where a football club isn't necessarily unambiguous.  Keep up the good work, nice to have another pair of eyes and another good editor looking at [[Ipswich Town F.C.|my favourite article]].   +++$+++ Hey Arbero, and thanks for your edits to the ITFC article.  I'm a keen fan of the club, and was one of the primary editors to get the article to [[WP:FA|featured]] status.  I noticed that most of your edits have been excellent, and just wanted to let you know that I'd sort-of reverted one of them, where I made it clear the club was an [[association football]] club, rather than just a [[football club]].  In any case, it's not a big deal, I just wanted this to be clear to an international audience where a football club isn't necessarily unambiguous.  Keep up the good work, nice to have another pair of eyes and another good editor looking at [[Ipswich Town F.C.|my favourite article]].  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 20:23, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
11658 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11657 +++$+++ 11657 +++$+++ 2010-09-13 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.284434940E09 +++$+++ Yeah, you're doing good work but you did remove the link to association football.  But not to worry, fixed now, and keep up the good stuff.  +++$+++ :Yeah, you're doing good work but you did remove the link to association football.  But not to worry, fixed now, and keep up the good stuff. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 20:29, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

273802 +++$+++ Chicken7 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273802 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-25 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.177512540E09 +++$+++ Wow! I was just about to message you to say the same thing! Weird. Thanx. By the way, how do you make infoboxes?  +++$+++ Wow! I was just about to message you to say the same thing! Weird. Thanx. By the way, how do you make infoboxes? [[User:Chicken7|Chicken7]] 07:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
273803 +++$+++ Chicken7 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273802 +++$+++ 273802 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.177602660E09 +++$+++ Hey, I've uploaded some photos from Sovereign Hill. I had a great time. I found some gold from the panning area but its only small. But it was still the biggest one all day! I think I understand how to create an infobox but want i want to know if you create it on a seperate page? Cheers.  +++$+++ :Hey, I've uploaded some photos from Sovereign Hill. I had a great time. I found some gold from the panning area but its only small. But it was still the biggest one all day! I think I understand how to create an infobox but want i want to know if you create it on a seperate page? Cheers. [[User:Chicken7|Chicken7]] 08:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

395159 +++$+++ Peridon +++$+++ Peridon +++$+++ 395159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-18 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.211168520E09 +++$+++ Just in case anyone wants to talk to me....  +++$+++ Just in case anyone wants to talk to me.... [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon#top|talk]]) 20:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
395160 +++$+++ Peridon +++$+++ Peridon +++$+++ 395159 +++$+++ 395159 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312393620E09 +++$+++ You did put the page up the first time round. Unfortunately, your career as listed at Spotlight (and which is user or agent supplied, and thus not a reliable source for use here) only appears to show minor roles, or roles in productions by student or otherwise non-notable organisations. As to the magazine, I didn't delete that, but can understand why it went. It was sourced entirely to the magazine's own website, and showed no notability. Interviewing notable people doesn't necessarily cascade notability down. Notability has to be shown in independent reliable sources, not own sites or user\/agent supplied directories. Please see [[WP:ENT]] and [[WP:RS]]. If you can meet these guidelines, please let me know.  +++$+++ :You did put the page up the first time round. Unfortunately, your career as listed at Spotlight (and which is user or agent supplied, and thus not a reliable source for use here) only appears to show minor roles, or roles in productions by student or otherwise non-notable organisations. As to the magazine, I didn't delete that, but can understand why it went. It was sourced entirely to the magazine's own website, and showed no notability. Interviewing notable people doesn't necessarily cascade notability down. Notability has to be shown in independent reliable sources, not own sites or user/agent supplied directories. Please see [[WP:ENT]] and [[WP:RS]]. If you can meet these guidelines, please let me know. [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon#top|talk]]) 10:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
395161 +++$+++ Nikthestoned +++$+++ Peridon +++$+++ 395159 +++$+++ 395159 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312408200E09 +++$+++ Also, I added some stuff to your Bragod page after stalking your userpage a bit, hope you don't mind! ''' +++$+++ :Also, I added some stuff to your Bragod page after stalking your userpage a bit, hope you don't mind! '''[[User:Nikthestoned|<font color="MidnightBlue">Nik</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Nikthestoned|<font color="CornflowerBlue">''the''</font>]][[User talk:Nikthestoned|<font color="ForestGreen">stoned</font>]]''' 14:50, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

11660 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-19 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.284961800E09 +++$+++ Hi! You forgot to add other 2 daughters Cabral had. Regards, -- +++$+++ Hi! You forgot to add other 2 daughters Cabral had. Regards, --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 22:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
11661 +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11660 +++$+++ 11660 +++$+++ 2010-09-19 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.284963660E09 +++$+++ {{Y}} Done.  +++$+++ : {{Y}} Done. [[User:Arbero|Arbero]] 23:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

535949 +++$+++ Privacy +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-22 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.174573680E09 +++$+++ I have quickly glanced through the votes and comments. Seems like nobody agreed with merging into [[:Category:China university stubs]]. Many voted for keep, but no one agreed with the merge with the China Category except the nominator himself and Alai. -  +++$+++ I have quickly glanced through the votes and comments. Seems like nobody agreed with merging into [[:Category:China university stubs]]. Many voted for keep, but no one agreed with the merge with the China Category except the nominator himself and Alai. - [[User talk:Privacy|Privacy]] 07:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
535950 +++$+++ Privacy +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535949 +++$+++ 535949 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.174615500E09 +++$+++ Yes people agreed with keeping the template. But as I read it only the nominator himself and Alai agreed with merging the category with China. -  +++$+++ : Yes people agreed with keeping the template. But as I read it only the nominator himself and Alai agreed with merging the category with China. - [[User talk:Privacy|Privacy]] 19:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
535951 +++$+++ Privacy +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535949 +++$+++ 535950 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.174616580E09 +++$+++ Sorry. Are you referring to the wrong discussion? -  +++$+++ :: Sorry. Are you referring to the wrong discussion? - [[User talk:Privacy|Privacy]] 19:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
535952 +++$+++ Privacy +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535949 +++$+++ 535951 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.174618080E09 +++$+++ I was referring to the closing of the SFD of Category:Republic of China university stubs. -  +++$+++ ::: I was referring to the closing of the SFD of Category:Republic of China university stubs. - [[User talk:Privacy|Privacy]] 19:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
535953 +++$+++ Privacy +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535949 +++$+++ 535952 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.174618740E09 +++$+++ But nobody except Alai agreed with the nominator's choice to upmerge to China. -  +++$+++ :::: But nobody except Alai agreed with the nominator's choice to upmerge to China. - [[User talk:Privacy|Privacy]] 19:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
535954 +++$+++ Privacy +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535949 +++$+++ 535953 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.174620420E09 +++$+++ I cited the naming conventions too. And I was of the opinion that Caerwine interpreted and applied the naming conventions wrongly. The naming conventions provide that \"Mainland China\" should be used if it is more appropriate than \"China\". This is exactly the case of the China university stub category, which had always been about institutions in Mainland China. What I suggested was to keep the scope, but to describe its scope in a better way (for example, but not limited to, renaming or rewriting the introduction) to reflect what it had been about. -  +++$+++ ::::: I cited the naming conventions too. And I was of the opinion that Caerwine interpreted and applied the naming conventions wrongly. The naming conventions provide that "Mainland China" should be used if it is more appropriate than "China". This is exactly the case of the China university stub category, which had always been about institutions in Mainland China. What I suggested was to keep the scope, but to describe its scope in a better way (for example, but not limited to, renaming or rewriting the introduction) to reflect what it had been about. - [[User talk:Privacy|Privacy]] 20:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
535955 +++$+++ Privacy +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535949 +++$+++ 535954 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.174624440E09 +++$+++ Furthermore, don't ignore the two or three keep votes at Republic of China university stubs which did not indicate if they agree with upmerge or not. In any case, the discussion is clearly producing a \"no consensus\" outcome. -  +++$+++ :::::: Furthermore, don't ignore the two or three keep votes at Republic of China university stubs which did not indicate if they agree with upmerge or not. In any case, the discussion is clearly producing a "no consensus" outcome. - [[User talk:Privacy|Privacy]] 21:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
535956 +++$+++ Privacy +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535949 +++$+++ 535955 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.174747920E09 +++$+++ Yes the discussion is closed. I don't think there is any reason to re-open the discussion or to re-discuss. It is because the problem is the way you closed it. The discussion produced a \"no consensus\" result. There is not even a plurality who support to up-merge to China. But you interpreted the result incorrectly. -  +++$+++ ::::::: Yes the discussion is closed. I don't think there is any reason to re-open the discussion or to re-discuss. It is because the problem is the way you closed it. The discussion produced a "no consensus" result. There is not even a plurality who support to up-merge to China. But you interpreted the result incorrectly. - [[User talk:Privacy|Privacy]] 07:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

273807 +++$+++ Eyedubya +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-26 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.177599360E09 +++$+++ Dear Sarah, you rv someting on POV grounds and lost the baby with the bathwater - i.e. a whole load of factual stuff, important to contextualising this important controversy, was undone. It can only be the Humphries stuff that's bordering on POV, and then, only because I haven't referenced it yet - please, don't do this. If the Humphries stuff annoys you so much, then just delete that. the other stuff is not POV. The only kind of person who would argue that Government policy is 'POV' and irrelevant is someone who deeply engaged in the local resistance with a specific perspective related to a vested interest, however genuine and heartfelt that is.  +++$+++ Dear Sarah, you rv someting on POV grounds and lost the baby with the bathwater - i.e. a whole load of factual stuff, important to contextualising this important controversy, was undone. It can only be the Humphries stuff that's bordering on POV, and then, only because I haven't referenced it yet - please, don't do this. If the Humphries stuff annoys you so much, then just delete that. the other stuff is not POV. The only kind of person who would argue that Government policy is 'POV' and irrelevant is someone who deeply engaged in the local resistance with a specific perspective related to a vested interest, however genuine and heartfelt that is. [[User:Eyedubya|Eyedubya]] 07:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
273808 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273807 +++$+++ 273807 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.177601880E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah - I have tried\/am trying hard with this editor (as no doubt you would have seen).  I was\/am hoping he would\/will read the guidelines I gave him in a welcome message (but he blanked that content soon after). I note your comment on his talk page regarding [[WP:3RR]] which for your information I also warned him on earlier today (also blanked) when I noted that he uses his registered user name and his IP address 124.191.205.72 to make undos & reverts.  If I can help you Sarah in this matter at any time please let me know - if he continues to revert I will post to Admin Noticeboard also. Best wishes, Steve.-- +++$+++ *Hi Sarah - I have tried/am trying hard with this editor (as no doubt you would have seen).  I was/am hoping he would/will read the guidelines I gave him in a welcome message (but he blanked that content soon after). I note your comment on his talk page regarding [[WP:3RR]] which for your information I also warned him on earlier today (also blanked) when I noted that he uses his registered user name and his IP address 124.191.205.72 to make undos & reverts.  If I can help you Sarah in this matter at any time please let me know - if he continues to revert I will post to Admin Noticeboard also. Best wishes, Steve.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 08:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
273809 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273807 +++$+++ 273807 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.177613760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help, Steve, (and for being more patient than me :)). I'll be going offline soon. I'm going to be try to go to the breakfast meeting with Jimbo tomorrow, but I'm going to have to get up at 4am or something ridiculous to get to Southbank in time and I'm not sure how successful I'll be with that! Take care Steve, ''' +++$+++ :Thanks for your help, Steve, (and for being more patient than me :)). I'll be going offline soon. I'm going to be try to go to the breakfast meeting with Jimbo tomorrow, but I'm going to have to get up at 4am or something ridiculous to get to Southbank in time and I'm not sure how successful I'll be with that! Take care Steve, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 11:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
273810 +++$+++ Eyedubya +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273807 +++$+++ 273809 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.177618980E09 +++$+++ Hi, of course, having been told what the rules are, I'll do my best, in good faith, to abide by those rules. As a new editor, I may well break rules from time to time. I'd rather spend time on content than reading a rulebook to be honest - like you I have a full and frantic life offline. Thanks for breaking me in.  +++$+++ :: Hi, of course, having been told what the rules are, I'll do my best, in good faith, to abide by those rules. As a new editor, I may well break rules from time to time. I'd rather spend time on content than reading a rulebook to be honest - like you I have a full and frantic life offline. Thanks for breaking me in. [[User:Eyedubya|Eyedubya]] 13:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
273811 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273807 +++$+++ 273807 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.177649160E09 +++$+++ My pleasure as always Sarah.  Hope you made it to the meeting (although getting up that early - yuck).  Anyway I left another message for [[User:Eyedubya|Eyedubya]] on his page this morning.  He has a bit of a problem with understanding what wiki is not (ie SOAP) but if he can get past that and also learn the guidelines on V, NPOV and OR - he will make a good editor.-- +++$+++ *My pleasure as always Sarah.  Hope you made it to the meeting (although getting up that early - yuck).  Anyway I left another message for [[User:Eyedubya|Eyedubya]] on his page this morning.  He has a bit of a problem with understanding what wiki is not (ie SOAP) but if he can get past that and also learn the guidelines on V, NPOV and OR - he will make a good editor.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 21:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

11664 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-28 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.296286860E09 +++$+++ Howzit bru, just a quick note to say thanks for the help with the Streltsov article. It's looking a lot better now, thank you. Just one thing, though: I'm not sure about the formatting of the EUFootball reference, or whether that will be accepted at FAC; can you shed some light on the subject? Thanks again. Keep well. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ Howzit bru, just a quick note to say thanks for the help with the Streltsov article. It's looking a lot better now, thank you. Just one thing, though: I'm not sure about the formatting of the EUFootball reference, or whether that will be accepted at FAC; can you shed some light on the subject? Thanks again. Keep well. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 23:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
11665 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.296288000E09 +++$+++ The question they will ask at FAC will be \"Why is this reliable?\"; not \"Why ''isn't'' this reliable?\"... Who publishes the website? Is it affiliated to anybody? Who backs it? Is it independent, or part of a network? I'm just asking you for more information about it, that's all. I'm not having a go at you, I'm just asking the questions the will ask at FAC. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :The question they will ask at FAC will be "Why is this reliable?"; not "Why ''isn't'' this reliable?"... Who publishes the website? Is it affiliated to anybody? Who backs it? Is it independent, or part of a network? I'm just asking you for more information about it, that's all. I'm not having a go at you, I'm just asking the questions the will ask at FAC. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 00:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11666 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ 11665 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.296288480E09 +++$+++ It's okay, EUFootball gives [www.russiateam.com] as a ref, which is acceptable. I'll change it now. Thanks :) <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::It's okay, EUFootball gives [www.russiateam.com] as a ref, which is acceptable. I'll change it now. Thanks :) <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 00:08, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11667 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ 11666 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.296288900E09 +++$+++ No problem mate. :) Feel free to drop me a line again if you need help with something. And thanks again for the help with Streltsov. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :::No problem mate. :) Feel free to drop me a line again if you need help with something. And thanks again for the help with Streltsov. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 00:15, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11668 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ 11667 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.296289860E09 +++$+++ The only problem there is that we only have the information for that one season. We know that Streltsov played in the Soviet Cup in other seasons, so this source alone is not adequate to represent the entire \"Cup\" column. Good work finding that, though; keep on looking, see if you can find something with more information on the Soviet Cup appearances. Well done, keep it up. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::::The only problem there is that we only have the information for that one season. We know that Streltsov played in the Soviet Cup in other seasons, so this source alone is not adequate to represent the entire "Cup" column. Good work finding that, though; keep on looking, see if you can find something with more information on the Soviet Cup appearances. Well done, keep it up. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 00:31, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11669 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ 11668 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.296290580E09 +++$+++ I remember when I was first working on this article a couple of years ago I scoured the Russian sites for information on this. The closest I came was [http:\/\/www.zatorpedo.narod.ru\/strelstat.html this], which (I don't know if you can read Russian) gives stats for all of his goals scored in all competitions, as well as career stats for European competitions and so forth. But these are totals &ndash; not by season &ndash; which is very irritating. I don't know that it would be regarded as reliable anyway, but I just thought I'd mention that I have looked pretty hard. I'll keep looking though, I'll let you know if I find anything; you do the same. :) <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :::::I remember when I was first working on this article a couple of years ago I scoured the Russian sites for information on this. The closest I came was [http://www.zatorpedo.narod.ru/strelstat.html this], which (I don't know if you can read Russian) gives stats for all of his goals scored in all competitions, as well as career stats for European competitions and so forth. But these are totals &ndash; not by season &ndash; which is very irritating. I don't know that it would be regarded as reliable anyway, but I just thought I'd mention that I have looked pretty hard. I'll keep looking though, I'll let you know if I find anything; you do the same. :) <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 00:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11670 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ 11669 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.296290760E09 +++$+++ Aha! [http:\/\/www.klisf.info\/inter\/ek\/gamer500.htm Here] we have European statistics! I'll add them in now. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::::::Aha! [http://www.klisf.info/inter/ek/gamer500.htm Here] we have European statistics! I'll add them in now. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 00:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11671 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ 11670 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.296291300E09 +++$+++ Well, I found the European stats, but I'm still looking for the Soviet Cup ones... but I'm sure I'll find them somewhere... you keep on looking if you want, I can read Russian, so don't worry about that aspect. I think if we get all of the stats and integrate the European stuff into the prose, we're probably up to FA. Keep in touch bru. :) <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :::::::Well, I found the European stats, but I'm still looking for the Soviet Cup ones... but I'm sure I'll find them somewhere... you keep on looking if you want, I can read Russian, so don't worry about that aspect. I think if we get all of the stats and integrate the European stuff into the prose, we're probably up to FA. Keep in touch bru. :) <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 00:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11672 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.296291900E09 +++$+++ Sleep tight pal. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :Sleep tight pal. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 01:05, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11673 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ 11672 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.296354180E09 +++$+++ Not yet. I have [http:\/\/www.zatorpedo.narod.ru\/strelstat.html this], which gives 15 Soviet Cup goals in his entire career, and gives dates of each one, but nothing about how many games he played per season... <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::Not yet. I have [http://www.zatorpedo.narod.ru/strelstat.html this], which gives 15 Soviet Cup goals in his entire career, and gives dates of each one, but nothing about how many games he played per season... <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 18:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11674 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11664 +++$+++ 11673 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.296356100E09 +++$+++ I think I'll leave it for now; we'd probably need some kind of statistics book for this, because I just can't find anything on his Soviet Cup stats, even on the Russian statistics sites. I'm going to give up the ghost, up to you if you want to go on. I think just leave it as it is until we find something definite from a book. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :::I think I'll leave it for now; we'd probably need some kind of statistics book for this, because I just can't find anything on his Soviet Cup stats, even on the Russian statistics sites. I'm going to give up the ghost, up to you if you want to go on. I think just leave it as it is until we find something definite from a book. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 18:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

45635 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-12 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.299934260E09 +++$+++ If you would admonish others for not being civil, please be civil yourself.  +++$+++ If you would admonish others for not being civil, please be civil yourself. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 04:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
45636 +++$+++ Joyson Noel  +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45635 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-12 06:08:00 +++$+++ 1.299938880E09 +++$+++ Anyway, i don't think that the concerned comment can even vaguely be construed as an insult. You are being unnecessarily over-sensitive.  +++$+++ :: Anyway, i don't think that the concerned comment can even vaguely be construed as an insult. You are being unnecessarily over-sensitive. [[User:Joyson Noel |<big><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000">Joyson Noel</FONT></big>]][[User talk:Joyson Noel |<small><sup><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000"> Holla at me!</FONT></sup></small>]] 06:08, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

482542 +++$+++ Geni +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-03 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.172956380E09 +++$+++ mostly the position has been it's a good idea get and do it. Some discusion here [[Wikipedia_talk:Fair_use#No_free_image_available]]. +++$+++ mostly the position has been it's a good idea get and do it. Some discusion here [[Wikipedia_talk:Fair_use#No_free_image_available]].[[User:Geni|Geni]] 13:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
482543 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482542 +++$+++ 482542 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.172956980E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I've posted a comment\/question there.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks.  I've posted a comment/question there.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 13:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
482544 +++$+++ LetsGoMets11 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482542 +++$+++ 482542 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.172961900E09 +++$+++ I think these are totally unnecessary, first off they are huge and look like a dead link on the page, second there is no point of having them, it doesn't take brain surgery to add a picture on a players page.  +++$+++ :I think these are totally unnecessary, first off they are huge and look like a dead link on the page, second there is no point of having them, it doesn't take brain surgery to add a picture on a players page. [[User:LetsGoMets11|LetsGoMets11]] 14:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
482545 +++$+++ SERSeanCrane +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482542 +++$+++ 482544 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.172963820E09 +++$+++ I think LetsGoMets11 may be a sock of [[User:Em0909153]].  +++$+++ ::I think LetsGoMets11 may be a sock of [[User:Em0909153]]. [[User:SERSeanCrane|SERSeanCrane]] 15:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
482546 +++$+++ LetsGoMets11 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482542 +++$+++ 482545 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.172964360E09 +++$+++ Now I am being accused of being a sock because I don't agree with what this guy is doing, so basically any one who doesn't agree with you is automatically being accused of being a sock, and actually have some proof I am this guy before you go around doing so.  +++$+++ :::Now I am being accused of being a sock because I don't agree with what this guy is doing, so basically any one who doesn't agree with you is automatically being accused of being a sock, and actually have some proof I am this guy before you go around doing so. [[User:LetsGoMets11|LetsGoMets11]] 15:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
482547 +++$+++ SERSeanCrane +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482542 +++$+++ 482545 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.172964960E09 +++$+++ If your not the sock I accused you of being, I apologize. I personally don't know how to check such things, hence I brought it up to wknight94; he's an administrator.  +++$+++ :::If your not the sock I accused you of being, I apologize. I personally don't know how to check such things, hence I brought it up to wknight94; he's an administrator. [[User:SERSeanCrane|SERSeanCrane]] 15:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
482548 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482542 +++$+++ 482547 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.172965080E09 +++$+++ I can't prove such things either.  You can bring evidence to [[WP:RFCU]] and they will find out more concretely. \u2014 +++$+++ ::::I can't prove such things either.  You can bring evidence to [[WP:RFCU]] and they will find out more concretely. —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 15:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

273815 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-27 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.177702020E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. You have to hear [[Wikipedia:Song\/The RfA Candidate's Song|this]] (it is better if you actually play it).  +++$+++ Hi Sarah. You have to hear [[Wikipedia:Song/The RfA Candidate's Song|this]] (it is better if you actually play it). [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 12:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
273816 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273815 +++$+++ 273815 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.177651860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the information regarding this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Linksearch&target=www.takver.com&namespace=&limit=500&offset=0] - I am going to go through each one next week.  Any special rules\/considerations I should know about?-- +++$+++ *Thanks for the information regarding this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Linksearch&target=www.takver.com&namespace=&limit=500&offset=0] - I am going to go through each one next week.  Any special rules/considerations I should know about?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 22:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
273817 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273815 +++$+++ 273816 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.177669800E09 +++$+++ Howdy - sorry to write to you so much whilst you are on a wiki break - no need to reply but just to inform you that I have started on this task.  The message I have posted '''[[User_talk:Tirin#WikiProject_SPAM|here]]''' may cause some reaction.  I will be away over the weekend (visiting your neck of the woods to go to the AFL).  We'll see how the user reacts - I hope he just understands the conflict of interest but if not then if I have to I'll go through the reporting mechanisms.-- +++$+++ ::Howdy - sorry to write to you so much whilst you are on a wiki break - no need to reply but just to inform you that I have started on this task.  The message I have posted '''[[User_talk:Tirin#WikiProject_SPAM|here]]''' may cause some reaction.  I will be away over the weekend (visiting your neck of the woods to go to the AFL).  We'll see how the user reacts - I hope he just understands the conflict of interest but if not then if I have to I'll go through the reporting mechanisms.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 03:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
273818 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273815 +++$+++ 273817 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.177686720E09 +++$+++ 70% or so of these now addressed.  Reasonable correspondence ensues from editor on my talk page.-- +++$+++ :::70% or so of these now addressed.  Reasonable correspondence ensues from editor on my talk page.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 08:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

535960 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-26 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.174972560E09 +++$+++ I've done pretty much what I can. I suggested a consistent compromise position that followed the permcats - using \"nation X stubs\" where the permcats are \"X of\/in nation\" and \"national X stubs\" where the permcats are \"national X\", and using this as a standard for all stub types, but this apparently wasn't acceptable to some, although for the life of me I don't understand why. Neither was the logical idea of simply using the permcat names followed by the word \"stubs\" (\"not grammatical\" say the same objecters). In some cases, though, the permcats use the \"of\/in nation\" for a very good reason. I certainly disagree with the suggestion raised in the SFD that the easy ones should be at national X and the harder ones at nation X - that seems to me ridiculous. And I certainly don't accept that this should be renamed - there was no consensus to do so at SFD, and if it is renamed then I shall bring it back there since it seems to me that to rename it would go against the tenet that\"no consensus = no change\" usually used at xfd pages. Or perhaps I should bring Dominica geography stubs, Dominican Republic geography stubs, Democratic Republic of the Congo geography stubs and Republic of Congo geography stubs to SFD, since both of the former pair should then be at \"Dominican geography stubs\", and the latter pair should both be at \"Congolese geography stubs\". Other than re-suggesting my initial compromise, in the hope that Alai and others will have another think about it, I can't think of where to go from here.  +++$+++ I've done pretty much what I can. I suggested a consistent compromise position that followed the permcats - using "nation X stubs" where the permcats are "X of/in nation" and "national X stubs" where the permcats are "national X", and using this as a standard for all stub types, but this apparently wasn't acceptable to some, although for the life of me I don't understand why. Neither was the logical idea of simply using the permcat names followed by the word "stubs" ("not grammatical" say the same objecters). In some cases, though, the permcats use the "of/in nation" for a very good reason. I certainly disagree with the suggestion raised in the SFD that the easy ones should be at national X and the harder ones at nation X - that seems to me ridiculous. And I certainly don't accept that this should be renamed - there was no consensus to do so at SFD, and if it is renamed then I shall bring it back there since it seems to me that to rename it would go against the tenet that"no consensus = no change" usually used at xfd pages. Or perhaps I should bring Dominica geography stubs, Dominican Republic geography stubs, Democratic Republic of the Congo geography stubs and Republic of Congo geography stubs to SFD, since both of the former pair should then be at "Dominican geography stubs", and the latter pair should both be at "Congolese geography stubs". Other than re-suggesting my initial compromise, in the hope that Alai and others will have another think about it, I can't think of where to go from here. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 22:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
535961 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535960 +++$+++ 535960 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.175077200E09 +++$+++ I agree, arguing about it does no good at all, which is why I offered the compromise which seems to me to be a perfectly logical way of doing things, avoiding the adjectival form ''only'' where it is also avoided in the permcats. I just don't understand why Alai in particular prefers to support a method which does not parallel the permcat names in any way and will frequently lead to mass confusion. And yes, I read your conversation with Alai about it, and I agree that if the permcat is Cat:Canadian athletes, then the stub cat should be Cat:Canadian athlete stubs - in fact, that is exactly what my compromise position suggests. It's only those cases where the permcat is \"X of\/in Foo\" that there's any real problem. Here, there are often speciofoc reasons why the permcat has not been names \"Fooian X\", so changing the stub cats to \"Fooian X stubs\" would be distinctly counterproductive. As I said above, ideally, they would be at \"X of\/in Foo stubs\", but Alai claims that this exact paralleling of the permcat name is too ungrammatical to be used. Using \"Foo X stubs\" on those and only those cases makes sense so as to avoid the problems that those specific categories have with \"Fooian\" and also to avoid the non-grammatical exact parallels.  +++$+++ :I agree, arguing about it does no good at all, which is why I offered the compromise which seems to me to be a perfectly logical way of doing things, avoiding the adjectival form ''only'' where it is also avoided in the permcats. I just don't understand why Alai in particular prefers to support a method which does not parallel the permcat names in any way and will frequently lead to mass confusion. And yes, I read your conversation with Alai about it, and I agree that if the permcat is Cat:Canadian athletes, then the stub cat should be Cat:Canadian athlete stubs - in fact, that is exactly what my compromise position suggests. It's only those cases where the permcat is "X of/in Foo" that there's any real problem. Here, there are often speciofoc reasons why the permcat has not been names "Fooian X", so changing the stub cats to "Fooian X stubs" would be distinctly counterproductive. As I said above, ideally, they would be at "X of/in Foo stubs", but Alai claims that this exact paralleling of the permcat name is too ungrammatical to be used. Using "Foo X stubs" on those and only those cases makes sense so as to avoid the problems that those specific categories have with "Fooian" and also to avoid the non-grammatical exact parallels. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 03:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

11675 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-05 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.296973080E09 +++$+++ Looking good. [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Eduard Streltsov\/archive1]] <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ Looking good. [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Eduard Streltsov/archive1]] <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 22:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
11676 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11675 +++$+++ 11675 +++$+++ 2011-02-05 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.296973320E09 +++$+++ I think so. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :I think so. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 22:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

273820 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273820 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-28 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.177782960E09 +++$+++ I am a couple of years older than Chicken7 (13).  +++$+++ I am a couple of years older than Chicken7 (13). [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 10:56, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
273821 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273820 +++$+++ 273820 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.177786920E09 +++$+++ Thankyou for the compliments! With the DYK, you may have noticed my comment on VS' DYKs. I did not want to give him a DYK medal because I have already given him a couple of awards and I don't want to come around as a suckup so I thought you could give him one. Thanks  +++$+++ * Thankyou for the compliments! With the DYK, you may have noticed my comment on VS' DYKs. I did not want to give him a DYK medal because I have already given him a couple of awards and I don't want to come around as a suckup so I thought you could give him one. Thanks [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 12:02, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

11677 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11677 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-11 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.297454280E09 +++$+++ Well done on the cup stats, I've just put a little caveat to make clear that's all we have data for, not the only appearances... <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ Well done on the cup stats, I've just put a little caveat to make clear that's all we have data for, not the only appearances... <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 11:58, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
11678 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11677 +++$+++ 11677 +++$+++ 2011-02-11 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.297457040E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure where I can find them... but I'll look. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :I'm not sure where I can find them... but I'll look. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 12:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
11679 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11677 +++$+++ 11678 +++$+++ 2011-02-11 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.297496640E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid not. The problem is that this is a Soviet player, if it were a Western player we'd have no problems finding the data. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::I'm afraid not. The problem is that this is a Soviet player, if it were a Western player we'd have no problems finding the data. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 23:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

11680 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-29 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.296360660E09 +++$+++ I am working on this one at the moment, if you want to help with it at all? <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ I am working on this one at the moment, if you want to help with it at all? <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 20:11, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11681 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11680 +++$+++ 11680 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.296364020E09 +++$+++ Well, one thing you can do if you don't find it too tedious and boring is add statistics to the \"players\" section of the page. Go to my [[User:Cliftonian\/Sandbox|sandbox]] and fill in the table there with the necessary stats: you should be able to get all of the stats from the pages at the top, but if there are some you can't find, give me a shout. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :Well, one thing you can do if you don't find it too tedious and boring is add statistics to the "players" section of the page. Go to my [[User:Cliftonian/Sandbox|sandbox]] and fill in the table there with the necessary stats: you should be able to get all of the stats from the pages at the top, but if there are some you can't find, give me a shout. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 21:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11682 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11680 +++$+++ 11681 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.296364740E09 +++$+++ No rush whatsoever pal, please, I'm happy to have you help, but don't feel obliged. :) <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::No rush whatsoever pal, please, I'm happy to have you help, but don't feel obliged. :) <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 21:19, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11683 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11680 +++$+++ 11682 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.296377940E09 +++$+++ Very well done. Now, we just have to find somewhere that has more information on the NASL play-offs, so we can get the final figures for those six players... <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :::Very well done. Now, we just have to find somewhere that has more information on the NASL play-offs, so we can get the final figures for those six players... <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 00:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
11684 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11680 +++$+++ 11683 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.296383460E09 +++$+++ Be patient bru, this isn't all I do you know ;) I'll let you know when I do. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::::Be patient bru, this isn't all I do you know ;) I'll let you know when I do. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 02:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
11685 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11680 +++$+++ 11684 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.296468960E09 +++$+++ [[List of New York Cosmos players|Ta-dah]]! ;) <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :::::[[List of New York Cosmos players|Ta-dah]]! ;) <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 02:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
11686 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11680 +++$+++ 11685 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.296520500E09 +++$+++ They come under the citation for Jose (2003) at the bottom of the page. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::::::They come under the citation for Jose (2003) at the bottom of the page. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 16:35, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
11687 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11680 +++$+++ 11686 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.296520800E09 +++$+++ Don't worry mate. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :::::::Don't worry mate. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 16:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
11688 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11680 +++$+++ 11687 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.296521940E09 +++$+++ Haven't decided yet. I'll let you know. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::::::::Haven't decided yet. I'll let you know. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 16:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

480486 +++$+++ Crusio +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-07 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.283878320E09 +++$+++ I'll be happy to help. Thanks for pointing out that useful popups tool to me, I've been using popups for a while now, but had this (and similar options) set to \"false\" (I'm not very adept at these monobook.js things... :-) I'll play around with it! -- +++$+++ I'll be happy to help. Thanks for pointing out that useful popups tool to me, I've been using popups for a while now, but had this (and similar options) set to "false" (I'm not very adept at these monobook.js things... :-) I'll play around with it! --[[User:Crusio|Crusio]] ([[User talk:Crusio|talk]]) 09:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
480487 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480486 +++$+++ 480486 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.283880060E09 +++$+++ My pleasure. Another thing - let's say you fix everything except a bunch of links that all need to be pointed to the same article ([[Academic journal]], for instance). Let me know; I can do mass fixes easily and quickly, but only in the case of \"every article left that links to [[Journal]] should be re-pointed to [[XXXX]]\".  Thanks for the note! -- +++$+++ :My pleasure. Another thing - let's say you fix everything except a bunch of links that all need to be pointed to the same article ([[Academic journal]], for instance). Let me know; I can do mass fixes easily and quickly, but only in the case of "every article left that links to [[Journal]] should be re-pointed to [[XXXX]]".  Thanks for the note! --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 10:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

273827 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273827 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-30 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.177934100E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I just wanted to tell you that I am taking a Wikibreak for around a week or two starting tomorrow because I am moving and also changing ISPs. Thankyou  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I just wanted to tell you that I am taking a Wikibreak for around a week or two starting tomorrow because I am moving and also changing ISPs. Thankyou [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 04:55, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
273828 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273827 +++$+++ 273827 +++$+++ 2007-04-30 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.177956300E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. I already have given him two awards though.  +++$+++ *Hi Sarah. I already have given him two awards though. [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 11:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

535972 +++$+++ Privacy +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535972 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.176352080E09 +++$+++ Please refer to the answer at my talk page. -  +++$+++ Please refer to the answer at my talk page. - [[User talk:Privacy|Privacy]] 21:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
535973 +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535972 +++$+++ 535972 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.176358440E09 +++$+++ There are [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser\/Case\/Instantnood|at least five]]. Which one? ;)-- +++$+++ :There are [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Instantnood|at least five]]. Which one? ;)--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 23:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

569926 +++$+++ Iamunknown +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569926 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.179807480E09 +++$+++ Hi, aeropagitica, considering that we don't usually indef block IP addresses for vandalism issues, I was wondering if you be unwilling to unblock or lessen the block on {{userlinks|207.165.130.253}}, at least as a trial measure.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi, aeropagitica, considering that we don't usually indef block IP addresses for vandalism issues, I was wondering if you be unwilling to unblock or lessen the block on {{userlinks|207.165.130.253}}, at least as a trial measure.  Thanks, [[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 21:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
569927 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569926 +++$+++ 569926 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.179811380E09 +++$+++ Unblocked for now to test the waters, let's see if the vandal returns.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Unblocked for now to test the waters, let's see if the vandal returns.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
569928 +++$+++ Iamunknown +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569926 +++$+++ 569927 +++$+++ 2007-05-23 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.179980160E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  Hopefully the vandal will not return.  :-)  -- +++$+++ :: Thank you.  Hopefully the vandal will not return.  :-)  --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 21:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
569929 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569926 +++$+++ 569926 +++$+++ 2007-05-23 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.179979740E09 +++$+++ I will respectfully ask you to tone down your hostile response to something of which I am unaware.  You need to provide a context in which your comments can be understood.  You will be blocked from editing if you continue to correspond with other editors in this manner.  Please see [[:WP:AGF]] and [[:Wikipedia:Etiquette]] for details of good conduct and interaction. Regards,  +++$+++ :I will respectfully ask you to tone down your hostile response to something of which I am unaware.  You need to provide a context in which your comments can be understood.  You will be blocked from editing if you continue to correspond with other editors in this manner.  Please see [[:WP:AGF]] and [[:Wikipedia:Etiquette]] for details of good conduct and interaction. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

535974 +++$+++ Neier +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.176271620E09 +++$+++ I noticed in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Register_transfer_level&diff=prev&oldid=121724673 this edit] that you were replacing <nowiki>{{electro-stub}}<\/nowiki> with <nowiki>{{electronics-stub}}<\/nowiki>; however, it seems that the old stub was just deleted.  I checked a few other articles from your contributions list, and they were all ok, except for the change you made to [[List of sensors]], which was right after the [[Register transfer level]] edit I linked to above.  The edits before and after those are ok, so, I don't know what's going on.  I fixed those two articles, but, you may want to verify that none of the other edits were broken.  Regards.  +++$+++ I noticed in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Register_transfer_level&diff=prev&oldid=121724673 this edit] that you were replacing <nowiki>{{electro-stub}}</nowiki> with <nowiki>{{electronics-stub}}</nowiki>; however, it seems that the old stub was just deleted.  I checked a few other articles from your contributions list, and they were all ok, except for the change you made to [[List of sensors]], which was right after the [[Register transfer level]] edit I linked to above.  The edits before and after those are ok, so, I don't know what's going on.  I fixed those two articles, but, you may want to verify that none of the other edits were broken.  Regards. [[User:Neier|Neier]] 23:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
535975 +++$+++ Neier +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535974 +++$+++ 535974 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.176309960E09 +++$+++ That makes sense.  I first thought maybe AWB was playing \"stub sensor\" on the articles, because it ''is'' fairly lengthy for a stub; but, the list was short, so I discarded that explanation.  The expandlist completely slipped my mind.  Thanks for the follow-up.  +++$+++ :That makes sense.  I first thought maybe AWB was playing "stub sensor" on the articles, because it ''is'' fairly lengthy for a stub; but, the list was short, so I discarded that explanation.  The expandlist completely slipped my mind.  Thanks for the follow-up. [[User:Neier|Neier]] 09:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

11689 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-31 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.296523020E09 +++$+++ Sure. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ Sure. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 17:17, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
11690 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11689 +++$+++ 11689 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.296523800E09 +++$+++ It looks nearly ready, I would just merge some of the stubby sentences and paragraphs together and give it a thorough copy-edit. I'll do that for you if you like, when I have some time. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :It looks nearly ready, I would just merge some of the stubby sentences and paragraphs together and give it a thorough copy-edit. I'll do that for you if you like, when I have some time. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 17:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
11691 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11689 +++$+++ 11690 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.296524280E09 +++$+++ I may do it this evening, we'll see when I have some time. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::I may do it this evening, we'll see when I have some time. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 17:38, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
11692 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11689 +++$+++ 11691 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.296524880E09 +++$+++ I'd also be inclined to cut down the bulk of the Tottenham and Manchester United sections; I don't think setting up a goal \"on 29 October 2008\" is really something that's historically notable, for example... <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :::I'd also be inclined to cut down the bulk of the Tottenham and Manchester United sections; I don't think setting up a goal "on 29 October 2008" is really something that's historically notable, for example... <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 17:48, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

535979 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-19 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.177050660E09 +++$+++ Hi Amalas - the reason i did that is that East Sussex is a couty in its own right like all the others listed. Technically Sussex as a county hasn't existed for 20 years or so - the only reason that a Sussex-geo-stub was made was - like the similar Yorkshire one - at the time there weren't enough stubs for separate types for East Sussex and West Sussex, If the Eqast Sussex one has been made, then a similar one should be for West Sussex and then - again like Yorkshire-geo-stub - the Sussex-geo-stub can probably be deleted.  +++$+++ Hi Amalas - the reason i did that is that East Sussex is a couty in its own right like all the others listed. Technically Sussex as a county hasn't existed for 20 years or so - the only reason that a Sussex-geo-stub was made was - like the similar Yorkshire one - at the time there weren't enough stubs for separate types for East Sussex and West Sussex, If the Eqast Sussex one has been made, then a similar one should be for West Sussex and then - again like Yorkshire-geo-stub - the Sussex-geo-stub can probably be deleted. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 23:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
535980 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535979 +++$+++ 535979 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.177137900E09 +++$+++ No problem. And happy birthday, BTW!  +++$+++ :No problem. And happy birthday, BTW! [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 23:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

11694 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11694 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-13 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.297599540E09 +++$+++ Ahhhhhhh, okay then. ;) <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ Ahhhhhhh, okay then. ;) <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 04:19, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
11695 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11694 +++$+++ 11694 +++$+++ 2011-02-13 08:48:00 +++$+++ 1.297615680E09 +++$+++ Have a look over it, see what you think. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :Have a look over it, see what you think. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 08:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
11696 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11694 +++$+++ 11695 +++$+++ 2011-02-13 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.297622220E09 +++$+++ If I were you, the next step would be a \"Style of play\" section. Try to tell us how Berbatov plays; how does he score? What makes him so good? <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::If I were you, the next step would be a "Style of play" section. Try to tell us how Berbatov plays; how does he score? What makes him so good? <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 10:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
11697 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11694 +++$+++ 11696 +++$+++ 2011-02-13 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.297627260E09 +++$+++ I am sure you would make my Swedish look horrible. ;) <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :::I am sure you would make my Swedish look horrible. ;) <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 12:01, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
11698 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11694 +++$+++ 11697 +++$+++ 2011-02-13 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.297627800E09 +++$+++ It's good &ndash; I've got quite a lot out of that. I'm going to write the new section now, I'll tell you when I'm done. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::::It's good &ndash; I've got quite a lot out of that. I'm going to write the new section now, I'll tell you when I'm done. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 12:10, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
11699 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11694 +++$+++ 11698 +++$+++ 2011-02-13 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.297630020E09 +++$+++ Have another look now. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ :::::Have another look now. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 12:47, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
11700 +++$+++ Cliftonian +++$+++ Arbero +++$+++ 11694 +++$+++ 11699 +++$+++ 2011-02-13 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.297632300E09 +++$+++ I think so. Nominate and let me know if you need any more help with it. <span style=\"color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;\"> \u2013  +++$+++ ::::::I think so. Nominate and let me know if you need any more help with it. <span style="color:#ffffff; background-color:#ff3300;"> – [[User:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">'''Cliftonian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cliftonian|<span style="color:#ffffff;">the orangey bit</span>]]</sup></span> 13:25, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

273839 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.179778140E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah - all is well with me - busy at work, and singing (my other full-time hobby), and wiki.  Thank you for your kindness, but please first support your dad - I can wait until the following weekend or the following month or two months no worries whatsoever.  Besides I would be much happier if I heard you were just concentrating on your dad. I have a singing engagement singing [[Verdi]]'s ''\"Requiem\"'' in Latin at the Opera House (along with a cast of 1000's) and I am performing a large acting singing part in a complex play written by [[Nick Enright]] over the next two months so you look after yourself and your family first. To answer your question - for when that time comes my personal featured content (3 GAs) is here [[User:VirtualSteve\/UserBoxes]] - under '''about me''' on my user page - oh just realised of course I am helping a fair bit to maintain [[Australia]] as an FA and I have a featured image - also found in the [[User:VirtualSteve\/Kudos]] area.  And perhaps this is important (?) my major assessment work for other editors GA's is developing here [[User:VirtualSteve\/Assessments]].  Best wishes to you for your Dad tomorrow.-- +++$+++ Hi Sarah - all is well with me - busy at work, and singing (my other full-time hobby), and wiki.  Thank you for your kindness, but please first support your dad - I can wait until the following weekend or the following month or two months no worries whatsoever.  Besides I would be much happier if I heard you were just concentrating on your dad. I have a singing engagement singing [[Verdi]]'s ''"Requiem"'' in Latin at the Opera House (along with a cast of 1000's) and I am performing a large acting singing part in a complex play written by [[Nick Enright]] over the next two months so you look after yourself and your family first. To answer your question - for when that time comes my personal featured content (3 GAs) is here [[User:VirtualSteve/UserBoxes]] - under '''about me''' on my user page - oh just realised of course I am helping a fair bit to maintain [[Australia]] as an FA and I have a featured image - also found in the [[User:VirtualSteve/Kudos]] area.  And perhaps this is important (?) my major assessment work for other editors GA's is developing here [[User:VirtualSteve/Assessments]].  Best wishes to you for your Dad tomorrow.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 13:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
273840 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273839 +++$+++ 273839 +++$+++ 2007-05-22 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.179817380E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah - I appreciate the welcome message on my talk page here: [http:\/\/meta.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:VirtualSteve] (It prompted me to actually put some detail on the meta user page). Take care of yourself today. -- +++$+++ *Thanks Sarah - I appreciate the welcome message on my talk page here: [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:VirtualSteve] (It prompted me to actually put some detail on the meta user page). Take care of yourself today. --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 00:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

535984 +++$+++ Dsmdgold +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535984 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-20 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.179659100E09 +++$+++ You deleted the above list as an expired PROD. I failed to see this addition of the PROD tag in time, and so have started a discussion at Deletion Review.  +++$+++ You deleted the above list as an expired PROD. I failed to see this addition of the PROD tag in time, and so have started a discussion at Deletion Review. [[User:Dsmdgold|Dsmdgold]] 04:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
535985 +++$+++ Dsmdgold +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535984 +++$+++ 535984 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.179788100E09 +++$+++ No problem, it all seems to have resolved. I do have one question though. The listed reason for the PROD was because this was a list of mostly red-links. Is this an uncontroversial reason for deletion?  +++$+++ :No problem, it all seems to have resolved. I do have one question though. The listed reason for the PROD was because this was a list of mostly red-links. Is this an uncontroversial reason for deletion? [[User:Dsmdgold|Dsmdgold]] 15:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

273843 +++$+++ DXRAW +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273843 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-27 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.180275120E09 +++$+++ Care to explain why you're going through my contributions and reverting them wholesale, without any discussion with me whatsoever?  +++$+++ Care to explain why you're going through my contributions and reverting them wholesale, without any discussion with me whatsoever? [[User:DXRAW|DXRAW]] 07:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273844 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273843 +++$+++ 273843 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.180275360E09 +++$+++ I'm rolling them all back. There is absolutely no consensus for categorising shows like this and given the fact some of these show are broadcast in dozens of countries around the world, the implication of categorisng shows like this is huge.  +++$+++ :I'm rolling them all back. There is absolutely no consensus for categorising shows like this and given the fact some of these show are broadcast in dozens of countries around the world, the implication of categorisng shows like this is huge. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273845 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273843 +++$+++ 273843 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.180275360E09 +++$+++ Just got your message, you complain that I'm reverting you without discussion, yet isn't that exactly what you have done to Mark?  +++$+++ :Just got your message, you complain that I'm reverting you without discussion, yet isn't that exactly what you have done to Mark? [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273846 +++$+++ DXRAW +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273843 +++$+++ 273845 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.180275480E09 +++$+++ No i have contributed to the discussion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Overcategorization&diff=prev&oldid=133807538]  +++$+++ ::No i have contributed to the discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Overcategorization&diff=prev&oldid=133807538] [[User:DXRAW|DXRAW]] 07:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273847 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273843 +++$+++ 273846 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.180276080E09 +++$+++ Yes, you contributed to the discussion ''after'' you rolled Mark back and ''after'' he came here twice to ask what you were doing. You wrote on my talk page, \"Care to explain why you're going through my contributions and reverting them wholesale, without any discussion with me whatsoever?\" yet that is precisely what you did to Mark, so I don't think you have any right to complain.  +++$+++ :::Yes, you contributed to the discussion ''after'' you rolled Mark back and ''after'' he came here twice to ask what you were doing. You wrote on my talk page, "Care to explain why you're going through my contributions and reverting them wholesale, without any discussion with me whatsoever?" yet that is precisely what you did to Mark, so I don't think you have any right to complain. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273848 +++$+++ DXRAW +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273843 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.180276320E09 +++$+++ He did not need to come back twice, Once was enough he was just impatient, According to the descriptions on the category's his removals were incorrect.  +++$+++ :::::He did not need to come back twice, Once was enough he was just impatient, According to the descriptions on the category's his removals were incorrect. [[User:DXRAW|DXRAW]] 07:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273849 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273843 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.180276740E09 +++$+++ No, the introductory statements were incorrect, his removals were correct. And I presume that he came back a second time because, looking at the edit times, you ignored his question and continued editing after he left the first message.  +++$+++ ::::::No, the introductory statements were incorrect, his removals were correct. And I presume that he came back a second time because, looking at the edit times, you ignored his question and continued editing after he left the first message. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

535993 +++$+++ Zerorules677 +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-06 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.186440660E09 +++$+++ What would you rate it in the Missouri quality scale? Just wondering. --<span style=\"font-family:Times New Roman\"> +++$+++ What would you rate it in the Missouri quality scale? Just wondering. --<span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User:Zerorules677|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:White"> &nbsp;ThinkBlue&nbsp;</span>''']] </span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User_talk:Zerorules677|(Hit '''BLUE''')]]</span> 15:51, 06 August 2007 (UTC)
535994 +++$+++ Zerorules677 +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535993 +++$+++ 535993 +++$+++ 2007-08-08 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.186609620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. I just wanted another person's opinion; since your in the Missouri project. Thanks again. --<span style=\"font-family:Times New Roman\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know. I just wanted another person's opinion; since your in the Missouri project. Thanks again. --<span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User:Zerorules677|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:White"> &nbsp;ThinkBlue&nbsp;</span>''']] </span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User_talk:Zerorules677|(Hit '''BLUE''')]]</span> 14:47, 08 August 2007 (UTC)

11706 +++$+++ Dysprosia +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-05-20 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.085069340E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the late reply, but I usually check new additions from the bottom of the page, not the top. What is your disappointment regarding?  +++$+++ Sorry for the late reply, but I usually check new additions from the bottom of the page, not the top. What is your disappointment regarding? [[User:Dysprosia|Dysprosia]] 09:09, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
11707 +++$+++ Dysprosia +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11706 +++$+++ 11706 +++$+++ 2004-05-21 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.085157720E09 +++$+++ I have not removed [[Sacix]]. I never touched the article. Check the edit history.  +++$+++ : I have not removed [[Sacix]]. I never touched the article. Check the edit history. [[User:Dysprosia|Dysprosia]] 09:42, 21 May 2004 (UTC)

590373 +++$+++ Threeafterthree +++$+++ R. Baley +++$+++ 590373 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-20 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.245554700E09 +++$+++ Hi R. Baley, an editor writes that he does not want ''summarize O'Reilly's smears'' and you see nothing wrong with that? Interesting. -- +++$+++ Hi R. Baley, an editor writes that he does not want ''summarize O'Reilly's smears'' and you see nothing wrong with that? Interesting. --[[User:Threeafterthree|Tom]] [[User talk:Threeafterthree|(talk)]] 20:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
590374 +++$+++ R. Baley +++$+++ R. Baley +++$+++ 590373 +++$+++ 590373 +++$+++ 2009-06-20 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.245555180E09 +++$+++ Some people probably think O'Reilly 'smears' people.  Don't watch him myself, but the comment overall appeared to be advocating a presentation of article content -that's germane to a talk page thread about the topic.  If the comment were primarily along the lines of, \"Hey OREILLY smears people!!!!\" or similar (even if long-winded) then yeah, remove it as the talk page is not a forum.   +++$+++ :Some people probably think O'Reilly 'smears' people.  Don't watch him myself, but the comment overall appeared to be advocating a presentation of article content -that's germane to a talk page thread about the topic.  If the comment were primarily along the lines of, "Hey OREILLY smears people!!!!" or similar (even if long-winded) then yeah, remove it as the talk page is not a forum.  [[User:R. Baley|R. Baley]] ([[User talk:R. Baley#top|talk]]) 20:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
590375 +++$+++ Threeafterthree +++$+++ R. Baley +++$+++ 590373 +++$+++ 590374 +++$+++ 2009-06-20 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.245558000E09 +++$+++ The point is that it is not necessary nor appropriate to use such language about the subject of the article on the talk page. People have strong opinions about O'Reilly, got it, but its better that people not show their bias on the talk page with such comments because its hard for other editors then not to think that bias will not carry over to their editing. Anyways, cheers, -- +++$+++ ::The point is that it is not necessary nor appropriate to use such language about the subject of the article on the talk page. People have strong opinions about O'Reilly, got it, but its better that people not show their bias on the talk page with such comments because its hard for other editors then not to think that bias will not carry over to their editing. Anyways, cheers, --[[User:Threeafterthree|Tom]] [[User talk:Threeafterthree|(talk)]] 21:20, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

70222 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ DynamoDegsy +++$+++ 70222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-28 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.233184440E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore|talk]]) 15:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
70223 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ DynamoDegsy +++$+++ 70222 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-04 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.233736620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore|talk]]) 00:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
70224 +++$+++ DynamoDegsy +++$+++ DynamoDegsy +++$+++ 70222 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-04 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.233774720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:DynamoDegsy|DynamoDegsy]] ([[User talk:DynamoDegsy|talk]]) 11:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
70225 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ DynamoDegsy +++$+++ 70222 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.239399360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] ([[User talk:Derek R Bullamore|talk]]) 14:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

535997 +++$+++ Ewen +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-22 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.187798340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ewen|Ewen]] 08:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
535998 +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535997 +++$+++ 535997 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.187816340E09 +++$+++ It looks like it was an expired [[WP:PROD|prod]].  When an article has the prod tag on it for more than 5 days, it can be deleted.   +++$+++ :It looks like it was an expired [[WP:PROD|prod]].  When an article has the prod tag on it for more than 5 days, it can be deleted.  [[User:Amalas|<font color="maroon"><b>~ Amalas</b></font>]] [[User talk:Amalas|<font color="navy">rawr]] [[Special:Contributions/Amalas|<sup>=^_^=</sup></font>]] 13:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
535999 +++$+++ Ewen +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535997 +++$+++ 535998 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.187833020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Ewen|Ewen]] 18:37, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
536000 +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535997 +++$+++ 535999 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.187836020E09 +++$+++ What I was able to pull from the history was this reason: \"non-notable roadie, no evidence of non-trivial third party coverage\".  I hope that helps.  +++$+++ :::What I was able to pull from the history was this reason: "non-notable roadie, no evidence of non-trivial third party coverage".  I hope that helps. [[User:Amalas|<font color="maroon"><b>~ Amalas</b></font>]] [[User talk:Amalas|<font color="navy">rawr]] [[Special:Contributions/Amalas|<sup>=^_^=</sup></font>]] 19:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
536001 +++$+++ Ewen +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535997 +++$+++ 536000 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.187839500E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your attending to this minor matter.  +++$+++ ::::I appreciate your attending to this minor matter. [[User:Ewen|Ewen]] 20:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
536002 +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 535997 +++$+++ 536001 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.187840820E09 +++$+++ As long as you cite reliable sources, you should be good to write a new article.  I would suggest writing a draft on a subpage of your user page before moving it into the article namespace.  Good luck and happy editing!  +++$+++ :::::As long as you cite reliable sources, you should be good to write a new article.  I would suggest writing a draft on a subpage of your user page before moving it into the article namespace.  Good luck and happy editing! [[User:Amalas|<font color="maroon"><b>~ Amalas</b></font>]] [[User talk:Amalas|<font color="navy">rawr]] [[Special:Contributions/Amalas|<sup>=^_^=</sup></font>]] 20:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

273858 +++$+++ John24601 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273858 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-27 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.180279920E09 +++$+++ Hi - the the consensus was formed and the page redirected [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AHeimlich_Manoeuvre&diff=131733389&oldid=131038577|here], after 6 days of discussion and unanimous support from a number of users. After this redirect had been performed, DXRAW started to revert the edits and started an argument on the talk page along the same lines as the one you and Mark seem to have been having. In response, I suggested we leave it for a further week and see if anybody else replied: with 2 more days to go, we've had one more oppose, but the balance of support is still clearly in favour of the redirect. -- +++$+++ Hi - the the consensus was formed and the page redirected [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AHeimlich_Manoeuvre&diff=131733389&oldid=131038577|here], after 6 days of discussion and unanimous support from a number of users. After this redirect had been performed, DXRAW started to revert the edits and started an argument on the talk page along the same lines as the one you and Mark seem to have been having. In response, I suggested we leave it for a further week and see if anybody else replied: with 2 more days to go, we've had one more oppose, but the balance of support is still clearly in favour of the redirect. --[[User:John24601|John24601]] 08:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273859 +++$+++ John24601 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273858 +++$+++ 273858 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.180280520E09 +++$+++ I hadn't even noticed the redirect to Heimlich Manouvre - that's been undertaken by DXRAW thismorning, with, by the looks of it, no discussion whatsoever! The article in question was at abdominal thrusts, the proposal was that relevant content should be placed in [[Choking]] and the original page should be redirected to there. Consensus was reached for this, and despite this DXRAW chose to undo it claiming there was none without discussing with anybody first. -- +++$+++ : I hadn't even noticed the redirect to Heimlich Manouvre - that's been undertaken by DXRAW thismorning, with, by the looks of it, no discussion whatsoever! The article in question was at abdominal thrusts, the proposal was that relevant content should be placed in [[Choking]] and the original page should be redirected to there. Consensus was reached for this, and despite this DXRAW chose to undo it claiming there was none without discussing with anybody first. --[[User:John24601|John24601]] 08:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

45643 +++$+++ ImperiumCaelestis +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-15 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.300233060E09 +++$+++ Hi Joyson, just heard that an emergency has been declared in Bahrain. I pray for the well being of you, your loved ones and everyone at large. Take care.  +++$+++ Hi Joyson, just heard that an emergency has been declared in Bahrain. I pray for the well being of you, your loved ones and everyone at large. Take care. [[User:ImperiumCaelestis|<font color="#FFA500">Imp</font><font color="#C0C0C0">er</font><font color="#008000">ium</font>]]<sup> [[User talk:ImperiumCaelestis|<font color="#0000FF">Caelestis</font> </sup>]] 16:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
45644 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45643 +++$+++ 45643 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.300285500E09 +++$+++ Same here. Hope that you and your family are safe throughout these turbulent times.  +++$+++ :Same here. Hope that you and your family are safe throughout these turbulent times. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 07:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
45645 +++$+++ Joyson Noel  +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45643 +++$+++ 45644 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.300290060E09 +++$+++ Imperium and AshLin, i can't describe in words as to how moved i am by the level of concern you both have shown for me. The situation has become very tense here. I'm very glad that the Saudi and Emirati troops are finally here. This emergency will go on for three months. There were a couple of attacks on South Asians in Manama on the 12th. Over fourteen people were butchered with swords and 400 foreigners injured by Shia miscreants. I live in [[Salmabad]], a Shia neighborhood. As such, i carry a knife with me at all times for self-defense. Just yesterday, there was firing here by Bahraini police on Shia demonstrators that left two dead. Business has gone down. The garages, convenience stores and supermarkets have been closed since yesterday. The rations at home are low as well. I don't know for how long this will continue. Thanks again for the wishes!  +++$+++ :: Imperium and AshLin, i can't describe in words as to how moved i am by the level of concern you both have shown for me. The situation has become very tense here. I'm very glad that the Saudi and Emirati troops are finally here. This emergency will go on for three months. There were a couple of attacks on South Asians in Manama on the 12th. Over fourteen people were butchered with swords and 400 foreigners injured by Shia miscreants. I live in [[Salmabad]], a Shia neighborhood. As such, i carry a knife with me at all times for self-defense. Just yesterday, there was firing here by Bahraini police on Shia demonstrators that left two dead. Business has gone down. The garages, convenience stores and supermarkets have been closed since yesterday. The rations at home are low as well. I don't know for how long this will continue. Thanks again for the wishes! [[User:Joyson Noel |<big><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000">Joyson Noel</FONT></big>]][[User talk:Joyson Noel |<small><sup><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000"> Holla at me!</FONT></sup></small>]] 08:41, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
45646 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45643 +++$+++ 45645 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.300293660E09 +++$+++ Hang in there, Joyson. When the going gets tough, the tough get going! First chance you get stock up on drinking water, foods, medicine and recharge for mobile phones. Lie low! We shall pray for you!  +++$+++ :::Hang in there, Joyson. When the going gets tough, the tough get going! First chance you get stock up on drinking water, foods, medicine and recharge for mobile phones. Lie low! We shall pray for you! [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 09:41, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
45647 +++$+++ Joyson Noel  +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45643 +++$+++ 45643 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.300295400E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Hope, it ends soon.  +++$+++ : Thanks! Hope, it ends soon. [[User:Joyson Noel |<big><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000">Joyson Noel</FONT></big>]][[User talk:Joyson Noel |<small><sup><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000"> Holla at me!</FONT></sup></small>]] 10:10, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

273860 +++$+++ DXRAW +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-27 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.180281180E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Abdominal_thrusts&diff=next&oldid=132643481], Why dont you read the talk page [[User:John24601|John24601]]. It was redrected with the edit summary \"100% support\" which was incorrect.  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Abdominal_thrusts&diff=next&oldid=132643481], Why dont you read the talk page [[User:John24601|John24601]]. It was redrected with the edit summary "100% support" which was incorrect. [[User:DXRAW|DXRAW]] 08:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273861 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273860 +++$+++ 273860 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.180281360E09 +++$+++ Please, an error in an edit summary is absolutely no excuse for making unilateral moves against consensus. Just stop your disruptive behaviour. ''' +++$+++ :Please, an error in an edit summary is absolutely no excuse for making unilateral moves against consensus. Just stop your disruptive behaviour. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 08:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273862 +++$+++ John24601 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273860 +++$+++ 273860 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 08:58:00 +++$+++ 1.180281480E09 +++$+++ That diff is from several days after the original decision was reached, at which time there was 100% support. There remains a clear consensus in favour of the merge even with you and Pzavon opposing. -- +++$+++ : That diff is from several days after the original decision was reached, at which time there was 100% support. There remains a clear consensus in favour of the merge even with you and Pzavon opposing. --[[User:John24601|John24601]] 08:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

613622 +++$+++ Ceiling Cat +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-19 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.240190040E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.doggasm.com\/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=6795&g2_serialNumber=4 I think someone haz found ur missing puppy].  +++$+++ [http://www.doggasm.com/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=6795&g2_serialNumber=4 I think someone haz found ur missing puppy]. [[User:Ceiling Cat|Ceiling Cat]] ([[User talk:Ceiling Cat|talk]]) 18:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
613623 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613622 +++$+++ 613622 +++$+++ 2009-04-19 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.240192860E09 +++$+++ Chow! Not in very good taste, I fear, but topical when the voyage is being recalled... . .  +++$+++ :Chow! Not in very good taste, I fear, but topical when the voyage is being recalled... . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

11718 +++$+++ Minghong +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-21 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.127341980E09 +++$+++ Also, SQL is used for not only RDBMS, but also ORDBMS. See also [[comparison of object-relational database management systems]] and [[list of object-relational database management systems]]. If you are moving, please take care of them as well (ORDBMS is RDBMS, but RDBMS is not necessary ORDBMS). If you are not sure how, I suggest reverting them for a moment. -- +++$+++ Also, SQL is used for not only RDBMS, but also ORDBMS. See also [[comparison of object-relational database management systems]] and [[list of object-relational database management systems]]. If you are moving, please take care of them as well (ORDBMS is RDBMS, but RDBMS is not necessary ORDBMS). If you are not sure how, I suggest reverting them for a moment. --[[User:Minghong|minghong]] 15:33, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
11719 +++$+++ Minghong +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11718 +++$+++ 11718 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.127373000E09 +++$+++ You didn't answer my question: ORDBMS is RDBMS, but RDBMS is not necessary ORDBMS. You just move RDBMS to SQL DBMS and left ORDBMS. That's not good. And ORDBMS should NOT be merged into RDBMS. -- +++$+++ : You didn't answer my question: ORDBMS is RDBMS, but RDBMS is not necessary ORDBMS. You just move RDBMS to SQL DBMS and left ORDBMS. That's not good. And ORDBMS should NOT be merged into RDBMS. --[[User:Minghong|minghong]] 00:10, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

273863 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-27 08:55:00 +++$+++ 1.180281300E09 +++$+++ Okay, John, Abdominal thrusts is now a protected redirect to Choking and Heimlich Manouvre is deleted (you may want to make that aredirect to Choking as well). Please check what I've done and make sure it is correct. Thanks, ''' +++$+++ Okay, John, Abdominal thrusts is now a protected redirect to Choking and Heimlich Manouvre is deleted (you may want to make that aredirect to Choking as well). Please check what I've done and make sure it is correct. Thanks, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 08:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273864 +++$+++ DXRAW +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273863 +++$+++ 273863 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.180281420E09 +++$+++ What an abuse of admin powers! You could of just protected the current article. You have shown your pov. I'm taking this to the admin notice board.  +++$+++ :What an abuse of admin powers! You could of just protected the current article. You have shown your pov. I'm taking this to the admin notice board. [[User:DXRAW|DXRAW]] 08:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273865 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273863 +++$+++ 273864 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.180281600E09 +++$+++ Feel free. Why should I have protected the current article? I've protected the redirect which is what the consensus appears to have been on the talk page. There certainly wasn't any consensus for you unilaterally moving the article to a totally different location. ''' +++$+++ ::Feel free. Why should I have protected the current article? I've protected the redirect which is what the consensus appears to have been on the talk page. There certainly wasn't any consensus for you unilaterally moving the article to a totally different location. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 09:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273866 +++$+++ John24601 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273863 +++$+++ 273863 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.180281780E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah, that was the decision which was reached, and is still largely agreed upon even with DXRAW and Pzavon opposing. Sorry you've been dragged into this, seems asthough it might be going on a bit longer if dxraw gets his way! -- +++$+++ :Thanks Sarah, that was the decision which was reached, and is still largely agreed upon even with DXRAW and Pzavon opposing. Sorry you've been dragged into this, seems asthough it might be going on a bit longer if dxraw gets his way! --[[User:John24601|John24601]] 09:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273867 +++$+++ DXRAW +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273863 +++$+++ 273865 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.180284720E09 +++$+++ Becouse it says \"I propose that we leave the discussion one week until 29\/5\/07.\"  +++$+++ :::Becouse it says "I propose that we leave the discussion one week until 29/5/07." [[User:DXRAW|DXRAW]] 09:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
273868 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273863 +++$+++ 273867 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.180285500E09 +++$+++ So that's why you went ahead and unilaterally shifted it without discussing it with anyone? Right. Please take further discussion of this to the article's talk page. As I said in my edit summary, I am not endorsing the redirect but your unilaterally shifting the article without discussion and against consensus is not acceptable. And as I also wrote in my edit summary, please continue discussions on the article's talk page and try to reach a clearer consensus. Thank you, ''' +++$+++ ::::So that's why you went ahead and unilaterally shifted it without discussing it with anyone? Right. Please take further discussion of this to the article's talk page. As I said in my edit summary, I am not endorsing the redirect but your unilaterally shifting the article without discussion and against consensus is not acceptable. And as I also wrote in my edit summary, please continue discussions on the article's talk page and try to reach a clearer consensus. Thank you, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 10:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

11720 +++$+++ R.Koot +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-21 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.127355060E09 +++$+++ Hi, I reverted your changes on [[OODBMS]] as both the change and you edit summary didn't make a lot of sense to me. Could you explain it in some greater detail? -- +++$+++ Hi, I reverted your changes on [[OODBMS]] as both the change and you edit summary didn't make a lot of sense to me. Could you explain it in some greater detail? --[[User:R.Koot|R.Koot]] 19:11, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
11721 +++$+++ R.Koot +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11720 +++$+++ 11720 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.127356260E09 +++$+++ I agree that SQL is not equal to relations, realtions refers to a data model and SQL is a query language. However your search\/replace changes are incorrect and on the verge of [[vandalism]]. I kindly request if you would stop for a moment and discuss your changes in some greater detail than 'SQL != relational'. -- +++$+++ : I agree that SQL is not equal to relations, realtions refers to a data model and SQL is a query language. However your search/replace changes are incorrect and on the verge of [[vandalism]]. I kindly request if you would stop for a moment and discuss your changes in some greater detail than 'SQL != relational'. --[[User:R.Koot|R.Koot]] 19:31, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
11722 +++$+++ R.Koot +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11720 +++$+++ 11720 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.127357220E09 +++$+++ [[Object-relational mapping]] is about [[Object-relational mapping]], not [[Object-SQL mapping]]! -- +++$+++ : [[Object-relational mapping]] is about [[Object-relational mapping]], not [[Object-SQL mapping]]! --[[User:R.Koot|R.Koot]] 19:47, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
11723 +++$+++ R.Koot +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11720 +++$+++ 11720 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.127358000E09 +++$+++ While you are probably are right on some deep ideological level, you introduce a lot of neologisms. Even if [[Object-relational mapping]] ''should'' be called [[Object-SQL mapping]] that's not how 99% of the world's populations does it and therefore Wikipedia shouldn't. Also I still consider your search\/replace edits as vandalism. -- +++$+++ : While you are probably are right on some deep ideological level, you introduce a lot of neologisms. Even if [[Object-relational mapping]] ''should'' be called [[Object-SQL mapping]] that's not how 99% of the world's populations does it and therefore Wikipedia shouldn't. Also I still consider your search/replace edits as vandalism. --[[User:R.Koot|R.Koot]] 20:00, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
11724 +++$+++ R.Koot +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11720 +++$+++ 11723 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.127358360E09 +++$+++ I you insist... -- +++$+++ :: I you insist... --[[User:R.Koot|R.Koot]] 20:06, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
11725 +++$+++ R.Koot +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11720 +++$+++ 11724 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.127358720E09 +++$+++ I you want to start arbitration against me there is little I can do about it. -- +++$+++ ::: I you want to start arbitration against me there is little I can do about it. --[[User:R.Koot|R.Koot]] 20:12, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
11726 +++$+++ R.Koot +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11720 +++$+++ 11724 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.127359320E09 +++$+++ See [[WP:NOT]], [[WP:NOR]] and [[WP:DR]]. -- +++$+++ ::: See [[WP:NOT]], [[WP:NOR]] and [[WP:DR]]. --[[User:R.Koot|R.Koot]] 20:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

536011 +++$+++ Tripodics +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 536011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-30 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.188499080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Tripodics|Tripodics]] 11:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
536012 +++$+++ Geniac +++$+++ Amalas +++$+++ 536011 +++$+++ 536011 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.188510480E09 +++$+++ Snipped email address for user's inbox's well-being. Other users can contact you via your talk page. -- +++$+++ :Snipped email address for user's inbox's well-being. Other users can contact you via your talk page. --[[User:Geniac|Geniac]] 14:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

585236 +++$+++ On the other side +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-22 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.206251820E09 +++$+++ Hello. I believe you're the admin who approved my rollback request. While I do appreciate it, I am asking that you remove the rollback feature from my account, as I have now been reverting vandalism with [[WP:TW|Twinkle]]. Thank you very much! --<font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ Hello. I believe you're the admin who approved my rollback request. While I do appreciate it, I am asking that you remove the rollback feature from my account, as I have now been reverting vandalism with [[WP:TW|Twinkle]]. Thank you very much! --<font color="blue">[[User:On the other side|'''On the''']]</font> <font color="green">[[User talk:On the other side|'''other side''']]</font> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/On the other side|'''Contribs''']]|[[Special:Emailuser/On the other side|@]]</sup> 22:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
585237 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585236 +++$+++ 585236 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.206400380E09 +++$+++ Hi, sorry for the delay in replying: I've been offline the last couple of days. Are you sure you want rollback removed for the reason you requested? MediaWiki rollback can be used alongside Twinkle, and many people who have Twinkle also have rollback. It's up to you, of course, but I just wanted to confirm.  +++$+++ :Hi, sorry for the delay in replying: I've been offline the last couple of days. Are you sure you want rollback removed for the reason you requested? MediaWiki rollback can be used alongside Twinkle, and many people who have Twinkle also have rollback. It's up to you, of course, but I just wanted to confirm. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

11728 +++$+++ Encyclopedist +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-17 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.134882480E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=George_W._Bush&diff=31767870&oldid=31767746 Acabo de revitir o erro que voc\xea fez] no artigo sobre o [[George W. Bush]], eu odeio-o!  Eu tive que tocar seu artigo - merda!  Nunca quero fazer algo assim uma outra vez.  Porem, eu j\xe1 sei que voc\xea somente fez um erro, e n\xe3o estava tentando vandalisar nada.  Tchau, senhor! Estava brincando tamb\xe9m! Ainda tenho que melhorar meu portugu\xeas! <b><font color=\"#000000\">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|\u03b5]] +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_W._Bush&diff=31767870&oldid=31767746 Acabo de revitir o erro que você fez] no artigo sobre o [[George W. Bush]], eu odeio-o!  Eu tive que tocar seu artigo - merda!  Nunca quero fazer algo assim uma outra vez.  Porem, eu já sei que você somente fez um erro, e não estava tentando vandalisar nada.  Tchau, senhor! Estava brincando também! Ainda tenho que melhorar meu português! <b><font color="#000000">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|ε]][[User:Encyclopedist|γκυκλοπαίδεια]][[Wikipedia|*]]</font><font color="#708090">[[User_talk:Encyclopedist|  (talk)]]</font></b> 21:08, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
11729 +++$+++ Encyclopedist +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11728 +++$+++ 11728 +++$+++ 2005-12-17 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.134882840E09 +++$+++ Voc\xea esta l\xe1? <b><font color=\"#000000\">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|\u03b5]] +++$+++ :Você esta lá? <b><font color="#000000">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|ε]][[User:Encyclopedist|γκυκλοπαίδεια]][[Wikipedia|*]]</font><font color="#708090">[[User_talk:Encyclopedist|  (talk)]]</font></b> 21:14, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
11730 +++$+++  +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11728 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-12-27 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.135756380E09 +++$+++ Tudo bem, apenas posso compreender o portugu\xeas, eu tenho que estudar mais! [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"#000000\">'''''\u03b5'''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::Tudo bem, apenas posso compreender o português, eu tenho que estudar mais! [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="#000000">'''''ε'''''</font>]][[User:Encyclopedist|<font color="#000000">'''γκυκλοπ'''</font>]][[User_talk:Encyclopedist|<font color="#808080">'''αίδεια'''</font>]][[Wikipedia|<font color="#808080">'''*'''</font>]] 23:53, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

273873 +++$+++ FenderTele +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-29 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.180425180E09 +++$+++ I encourage you to take a look at JNee, Aussie llama or Tomispro's contributions. +++$+++ I encourage you to take a look at JNee, Aussie llama or Tomispro's contributions.[[User:FenderTele|&#39;&#39;&#39;&#39;&#39;â£Î­Ã±ÄÑá¹á¹­ÎµÉ­Ä&#39;&#39;&#39;&#39;&#39;]] 00:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
273874 +++$+++ Pzavon +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273873 +++$+++ 273873 +++$+++ 2007-05-28 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.180421280E09 +++$+++ As to knowing that messages are left for me on my talk page - certainly.  Wikipedia raises a red flag when I log on and there is a new message - and I have my Talk page set to \"Watch\" so changes bring it up on my Watcklist.   +++$+++ :As to knowing that messages are left for me on my talk page - certainly.  Wikipedia raises a red flag when I log on and there is a new message - and I have my Talk page set to "Watch" so changes bring it up on my Watcklist.  [[User:Pzavon|Pzavon]] 23:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
273875 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273873 +++$+++ 273874 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.180467960E09 +++$+++ In response to your comments re messages left on your talk page, my original comment was regarding your ''userpage''  +++$+++ ::In response to your comments re messages left on your talk page, my original comment was regarding your ''userpage'' [[User:Pzavon|here]], not your talk page. People have been mistakenly leaving you messages on your userpage ''instead'' of your talk page and I was unsure if you were aware that there were messages there for you.  '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 12:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

559049 +++$+++ Aminullah +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 559049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-28 09:25:00 +++$+++ 1.180369500E09 +++$+++ It is good that you revert blocked users' edits, but it would be even better if you checked if they aren't useful. I don't think that restoring Islamic honorifics such as p.b.u.h or k.s.a is necessary. It's more in accordance with [[WP:NPOV]] to leave them out.  +++$+++ It is good that you revert blocked users' edits, but it would be even better if you checked if they aren't useful. I don't think that restoring Islamic honorifics such as p.b.u.h or k.s.a is necessary. It's more in accordance with [[WP:NPOV]] to leave them out. [[User:Aminullah|Aminullah]] 09:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
559050 +++$+++  +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 559049 +++$+++ 559049 +++$+++ 2007-05-28 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.180395960E09 +++$+++ Other users are allowed to make changes to my edits as they see fit. But DavidYork71 is not allowed to edit, and I intend to enforce this. To be honest, he's made a lot of changes that ''aren't'' NPOV either, and I have no desired to pick through them all and decide what's worth keeping and what's not. If ever he finally learns he's not welcome here, he can get out of the way and make it easier for other editors to take planned and considered steps toward NPOV. It'll be more difficult as long as he's using Wikipedia, though. Sorry. \xb7\xb7[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=\" font-variant: small-caps\" >l<\/span>]][[ user talk: coelacan |acan]] 16:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :Other users are allowed to make changes to my edits as they see fit. But DavidYork71 is not allowed to edit, and I intend to enforce this. To be honest, he's made a lot of changes that ''aren't'' NPOV either, and I have no desired to pick through them all and decide what's worth keeping and what's not. If ever he finally learns he's not welcome here, he can get out of the way and make it easier for other editors to take planned and considered steps toward NPOV. It'll be more difficult as long as he's using Wikipedia, though. Sorry. ··[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=" font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>]][[ user talk: coelacan |acan]] 16:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

273876 +++$+++ Chicken7 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273876 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.180623300E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I was typing the lyrics for [[I Am Australian]] when I happened to look in the history. I saw you had reverted lyrics earlier. My question is, how come? If you look at [[Advance Australia Fair]] and [[Waltzing Matilda]] they have lyrics aswell. I hope you're well. <font color=\"darkblue\"><font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"5\">  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I was typing the lyrics for [[I Am Australian]] when I happened to look in the history. I saw you had reverted lyrics earlier. My question is, how come? If you look at [[Advance Australia Fair]] and [[Waltzing Matilda]] they have lyrics aswell. I hope you're well. <font color="darkblue"><font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="5"> [[User:Chicken7|Chicken]]-[[User talk:Chicken7|7]] </font> </font> 07:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
273877 +++$+++ Chicken7 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273876 +++$+++ 273876 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.180635300E09 +++$+++ Hey again. I understand about the lyrics. Thanks for the tip. About the ANF I think I made quite alot of mistakes. No.1 It said mark stone because i copied from the [[Parks Victoria]] infobox template. No.2 I got confused with it being a company or chain. It's just that theres one in my area and its an anf so I thought I'd write a article about it. When I got to the website there was very limited info and because it's not a company thats probably the reason. Thanks for informing me. You can either delete it or fix it up, I dont mind. Cheers. <font color=\"darkblue\"><font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"5\">  +++$+++ :Hey again. I understand about the lyrics. Thanks for the tip. About the ANF I think I made quite alot of mistakes. No.1 It said mark stone because i copied from the [[Parks Victoria]] infobox template. No.2 I got confused with it being a company or chain. It's just that theres one in my area and its an anf so I thought I'd write a article about it. When I got to the website there was very limited info and because it's not a company thats probably the reason. Thanks for informing me. You can either delete it or fix it up, I dont mind. Cheers. <font color="darkblue"><font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="5"> [[User:Chicken7|Chicken]]-[[User talk:Chicken7|7]] </font> </font> 11:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
273878 +++$+++ Chicken7 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273876 +++$+++ 273877 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.180636260E09 +++$+++ I wont reply much at all because i got 4 assignments due monday and some i havent started! Ill try to help. By the way is there a article or something about [[St Peter]] symbols? Ive scanned the article but no success. Cheers <font color=\"darkblue\"><font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"5\">  +++$+++ ::I wont reply much at all because i got 4 assignments due monday and some i havent started! Ill try to help. By the way is there a article or something about [[St Peter]] symbols? Ive scanned the article but no success. Cheers <font color="darkblue"><font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="5"> [[User:Chicken7|Chicken]]-[[User talk:Chicken7|7]] </font> </font> 11:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

11734 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11734 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-13 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.147579920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] 21:12, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
11735 +++$+++ Kmsiever +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11734 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.147587900E09 +++$+++ When you're discussing prose, not the name of a company or organisation. There are no phrases in M\xe9tis Nation - Saskatchewan any more than there is a phrase in your name or mine. Again, please indicate any source that shows the organisation uses an em dash in their name. -- +++$+++ ::When you're discussing prose, not the name of a company or organisation. There are no phrases in Métis Nation - Saskatchewan any more than there is a phrase in your name or mine. Again, please indicate any source that shows the organisation uses an em dash in their name. --[[User:Kmsiever|Kmsiever]] 23:25, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

273879 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273879 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.180641960E09 +++$+++ I took some time offline a few weeks back, and headed interstate for some work-related duties. Now that I'm back, it seems not much has changed at the asylum :) Keep up the good work, the battle is long, but worth it :) --  +++$+++ I took some time offline a few weeks back, and headed interstate for some work-related duties. Now that I'm back, it seems not much has changed at the asylum :) Keep up the good work, the battle is long, but worth it :) -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 13:06, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
273880 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273879 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.180642200E09 +++$+++ And if he says that, then it must be true - (asylum and battle) - as always ... +++$+++ ::And if he says that, then it must be true - (asylum and battle) - as always ...[[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 13:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

273881 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.180645620E09 +++$+++ Be that as it may, and not to quibble with your block, but I did some research and I've found that this puppeteer does in fact exist - the Washington Post described him as a \"master\", for instance, and Woodcarver Online calls him a \"leading puppet artist\". May I ask why you decided that the creation of the article was indicative of socklike behavior?  +++$+++ Be that as it may, and not to quibble with your block, but I did some research and I've found that this puppeteer does in fact exist - the Washington Post described him as a "master", for instance, and Woodcarver Online calls him a "leading puppet artist". May I ask why you decided that the creation of the article was indicative of socklike behavior? [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 14:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
273882 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273881 +++$+++ 273881 +++$+++ 2007-06-03 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.180916280E09 +++$+++ Ah, I understand. Thank you. Most annoying when they do that; his suspension means that he's not allowed to edit the database for ''anything'', not even to create valid new articles. And if the articles were allowed to remain, his suspension would be meaningless. Pity, since they ''are'' valid. I trust that, when his suspension finally expires, you'll allow their re-creation?  +++$+++ :Ah, I understand. Thank you. Most annoying when they do that; his suspension means that he's not allowed to edit the database for ''anything'', not even to create valid new articles. And if the articles were allowed to remain, his suspension would be meaningless. Pity, since they ''are'' valid. I trust that, when his suspension finally expires, you'll allow their re-creation? [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 17:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

11739 +++$+++ Blainster +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-06 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.152170220E09 +++$+++ Some codes have been superceded by direct entry of [[Unicode]] such as the [[emdash]] you replaced in [[Bat bomb]], but others such as the no-break-space have no direct equivalent that I am aware of.  The no-break-space (&amp;nbsp;) prevents line breaks in the middle of compound words or expressions.  Thanks. -- +++$+++ Some codes have been superceded by direct entry of [[Unicode]] such as the [[emdash]] you replaced in [[Bat bomb]], but others such as the no-break-space have no direct equivalent that I am aware of.  The no-break-space (&amp;nbsp;) prevents line breaks in the middle of compound words or expressions.  Thanks. --[[User:Blainster|Blainster]] 00:17, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
11740 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11739 +++$+++ 11739 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.152539880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ : [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] 06:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

11743 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-16 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.155779700E09 +++$+++ Why did you remove (in [[Four Freedoms]]) a blockquote element (which, among other things, works correctly for voicebrowsers for the blind) and replace it with simple indents? Markup should generally deal with semantics, not presentation. (Also, blockquote typically has ''better'' presentation, because on most browsers it indents from both margins.) -  +++$+++ Why did you remove (in [[Four Freedoms]]) a blockquote element (which, among other things, works correctly for voicebrowsers for the blind) and replace it with simple indents? Markup should generally deal with semantics, not presentation. (Also, blockquote typically has ''better'' presentation, because on most browsers it indents from both margins.) - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 18:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
11744 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11743 +++$+++ 11743 +++$+++ 2006-08-19 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.156009440E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ : [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] 10:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

11745 +++$+++ Mr Stephen +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-09 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.160428140E09 +++$+++ Please note that the footnote comes after the punctuation, eg <nowiki>\".<ref>  ... <\/ref>\" and not \"\"<ref>  ... <\/ref>.\"<\/nowiki>  Sorry for the brevity, I'm needed elsewhere for 1\/2 hour.  Regards,  +++$+++ Please note that the footnote comes after the punctuation, eg <nowiki>".<ref>  ... </ref>" and not ""<ref>  ... </ref>."</nowiki>  Sorry for the brevity, I'm needed elsewhere for 1/2 hour.  Regards, [[User:Mr Stephen|Mr Stephen]] 14:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
11746 +++$+++ Mr Stephen +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11745 +++$+++ 11745 +++$+++ 2006-10-10 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.160520180E09 +++$+++ Yes, it's at [[Wikipedia:Footnotes]], and I should have said that in my first message.  For what it's worth, I think it looks better before the punctuation too, but [[WP:MOS]] and all that ...  Regards,  +++$+++ :Yes, it's at [[Wikipedia:Footnotes]], and I should have said that in my first message.  For what it's worth, I think it looks better before the punctuation too, but [[WP:MOS]] and all that ...  Regards, [[User:Mr Stephen|Mr Stephen]] 15:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

536035 +++$+++ Suicup +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-05 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.149511920E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking this case. Any chance you'll let us know when you start? Nothing has been said for almost a week. Cheers. +++$+++ Thanks for taking this case. Any chance you'll let us know when you start? Nothing has been said for almost a week. Cheers.[[User:Suicup|Suicup]] 05:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
536036 +++$+++ Suicup +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536035 +++$+++ 536035 +++$+++ 2006-06-10 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.149951360E09 +++$+++ If Ghirlando (the main protagonist) doesn't respond, what is the next course of action? +++$+++ : If Ghirlando (the main protagonist) doesn't respond, what is the next course of action?[[User:Suicup|Suicup]] 07:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

11749 +++$+++ Ghirlandajo +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-19 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.161277260E09 +++$+++ I don't know what you've been doing with [[Russo-Swedish War (1590-1595)]], but, following your unexplained move, there are [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Russo%E2%80%93Swedish_War_%281590%E2%80%931595%29 multiple double redirects] and the link from [[Livonian War]] has suddenly gone read. It's not the first time that I notice disruptive consequences of your moves. Please fix the problems. --<font color=\"FC4339\"> +++$+++ I don't know what you've been doing with [[Russo-Swedish War (1590-1595)]], but, following your unexplained move, there are [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Russo%E2%80%93Swedish_War_%281590%E2%80%931595%29 multiple double redirects] and the link from [[Livonian War]] has suddenly gone read. It's not the first time that I notice disruptive consequences of your moves. Please fix the problems. --<font color="FC4339">[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</font></sup> 10:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
11750 +++$+++ Ghirlandajo +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11749 +++$+++ 11749 +++$+++ 2006-10-20 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.161370920E09 +++$+++ I still fail to understand what you attempt to do. After your moves, a couple of links in [[Template:Russo-Swedish War Series]] has gone red. Where did my articles disappear? --<font color=\"FC4339\"> +++$+++ :I still fail to understand what you attempt to do. After your moves, a couple of links in [[Template:Russo-Swedish War Series]] has gone red. Where did my articles disappear? --<font color="FC4339">[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</font></sup> 12:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

11751 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-19 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.161302580E09 +++$+++ Is there some other style guide you're following that uses en-dashes for all hyphenation?  +++$+++ Is there some other style guide you're following that uses en-dashes for all hyphenation? [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 17:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
11752 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11751 +++$+++ 11751 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.161303240E09 +++$+++ Ah, ok; that explains it. :-)  +++$+++ :Ah, ok; that explains it. :-) [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 17:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

536042 +++$+++ Cherry blossom tree +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536042 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-15 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.150433400E09 +++$+++ It depends on the case in question. What page are you discussing and under what circumstances was the rejected template placed on it? Is there consensus for it being there? -- +++$+++ It depends on the case in question. What page are you discussing and under what circumstances was the rejected template placed on it? Is there consensus for it being there? --[[User talk:Cherry blossom tree|Cherry blossom tree]] 21:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
536043 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536042 +++$+++ 536042 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.150433880E09 +++$+++ The page is [[Wikipedia:Justice Court]], the page was never proposed as a policy.  +++$+++ :The page is [[Wikipedia:Justice Court]], the page was never proposed as a policy. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.plrd]] 21:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
536044 +++$+++ Cherry blossom tree +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536042 +++$+++ 536043 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.150434420E09 +++$+++ I think that since your page would have effects beyond improving articles it would require community consensus. Most of the comments it has received have been opposed to it (admittedly from a small number of people) but if you want more opinions then you could post at the [[WP:VP|village pump]] or on the [[WP:CBB|community bulletin board]].-- +++$+++ ::I think that since your page would have effects beyond improving articles it would require community consensus. Most of the comments it has received have been opposed to it (admittedly from a small number of people) but if you want more opinions then you could post at the [[WP:VP|village pump]] or on the [[WP:CBB|community bulletin board]].--[[User talk:Cherry blossom tree|Cherry blossom tree]] 22:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
536045 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536042 +++$+++ 536044 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.150438200E09 +++$+++ The article's purpose is to improve admins, can I remove the tag as it has not been submitted for consensus and therefore has not been rejected.  +++$+++ :::The article's purpose is to improve admins, can I remove the tag as it has not been submitted for consensus and therefore has not been rejected. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.plrd]] 23:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
536046 +++$+++ Cherry blossom tree +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536042 +++$+++ 536045 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.150439160E09 +++$+++ I realise what the page's purpose is. It has been rejected by those users who have expressed their opinion on its talk page. If you want to get other opinions on it then you are welcome to modify its status in light of that. -- +++$+++ ::::I realise what the page's purpose is. It has been rejected by those users who have expressed their opinion on its talk page. If you want to get other opinions on it then you are welcome to modify its status in light of that. --[[User talk:Cherry blossom tree|Cherry blossom tree]] 23:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

11756 +++$+++ Jeltz +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.163621040E09 +++$+++ You changed spaced en dashes to dpaced em dashes in [[Ivan Argunov]] in instances where both would be correct. It is just a matter of which style you adopt, and Wikipedia has no adopted website wide policy so I believe that the policy is to let the current style be left alone as long as one article just uses one style of dashing, consistency within articles is important. I welcome discussion at [[Wikipedia:Manual of style (dashes)]] since discussion there about which styles of dashes Wikipedia should use is mostly dead. The dash policy also seems to be a bit out of date since it mentions html entities.  +++$+++ You changed spaced en dashes to dpaced em dashes in [[Ivan Argunov]] in instances where both would be correct. It is just a matter of which style you adopt, and Wikipedia has no adopted website wide policy so I believe that the policy is to let the current style be left alone as long as one article just uses one style of dashing, consistency within articles is important. I welcome discussion at [[Wikipedia:Manual of style (dashes)]] since discussion there about which styles of dashes Wikipedia should use is mostly dead. The dash policy also seems to be a bit out of date since it mentions html entities. [[user:Jeltz|Jeltz]] [[user talk:Jeltz|<small>talk</small>]] 12:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
11757 +++$+++ Spinality +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11756 +++$+++ 11756 +++$+++ 2007-05-04 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.178327820E09 +++$+++ I note that you just did a lot of dash conversion on [[History of CP\/CMS]] and related articles. Just for the record, [[Wikipedia:Manual of style (dashes)]] advises \"editors are encouraged not to convert others' dash styles without good reason\" and considers the 'spaced en dash', which had been used there consistently, as an acceptable dash style.  +++$+++ : I note that you just did a lot of dash conversion on [[History of CP/CMS]] and related articles. Just for the record, [[Wikipedia:Manual of style (dashes)]] advises "editors are encouraged not to convert others' dash styles without good reason" and considers the 'spaced en dash', which had been used there consistently, as an acceptable dash style. [[User:Spinality|Trevor Hanson]] 18:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

273901 +++$+++ Bibliomaniac15 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273901 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-13 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.181722200E09 +++$+++ G'day to you! '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color=\"black\">bibliomaniac<\/font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color=\"red\">1<\/font>]][[Special:Contributions\/Bibliomaniac15|<font color=\"blue\">5<\/font>]]''''' <small> +++$+++ G'day to you! '''''[[User:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="black">bibliomaniac</font>]][[User talk:Bibliomaniac15|<font color="red">1</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bibliomaniac15|<font color="blue">5</font>]]''''' <small>[[User:Bibliomaniac15/How many Wikipedians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?|An age old question...]]</small> 01:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
273902 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273901 +++$+++ 273901 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.181729580E09 +++$+++ Congratulations Sarah, for your day! :)  +++$+++ :Congratulations Sarah, for your day! :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 03:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
273903 +++$+++ Phaedriel +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273901 +++$+++ 273901 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.181738100E09 +++$+++ Dear Sarah, don't worry: I'll make more sense by email :) Something \"did\" happen, and it was me who awarded you this (it's part of my [[User:Phaedriel\/Today\/Archive|Today's wikipedian campaign]], that I've been carrying out for many weeks now) but a blocked sockpuppet tried to notify you of my selection of you without my permission, and trying to take the credit for herself like she had awarded you your Day. Look for my email in a short while :) But meanwhile, have the most joyous day - it's your Day, dear Sarah! :) Love,  +++$+++ :Dear Sarah, don't worry: I'll make more sense by email :) Something "did" happen, and it was me who awarded you this (it's part of my [[User:Phaedriel/Today/Archive|Today's wikipedian campaign]], that I've been carrying out for many weeks now) but a blocked sockpuppet tried to notify you of my selection of you without my permission, and trying to take the credit for herself like she had awarded you your Day. Look for my email in a short while :) But meanwhile, have the most joyous day - it's your Day, dear Sarah! :) Love, [[User:Phaedriel|<b><font color="#009900">P<font color="#00AA00">h<font color="#00BB00">a<font color="#00CC00">e<font color="#00DD00">d</font>r</font>i</font>e</font>l</b>]] - 05:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

273904 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-13 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.181740260E09 +++$+++ Hi! This is well deserved. I don't think you get all the credit around here you deserve....best wishes!-- +++$+++ Hi! This is well deserved. I don't think you get all the credit around here you deserve....best wishes!--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 06:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
273905 +++$+++ Arnon Chaffin +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273904 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.181764740E09 +++$+++ Happy Sarah's day! Enjoy,<font face=\"Lucida Calligraphy\"> +++$+++ ::*Happy Sarah's day! Enjoy,<font face="Lucida Calligraphy">[[User:Arnon Chaffin|<font color="Gold">'''Arnon Chaffin'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Arnon Chaffin|<font color="Chrome">'''Talk'''</font>]])</font> 12:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
273906 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273904 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.181766840E09 +++$+++ Yay! Sarah! Woo! And other celebratory noises :)  +++$+++ :::Yay! Sarah! Woo! And other celebratory noises :) [[User:Riana|Riana]] [[User talk:Riana|<font color="green">â</font>]] 13:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
273907 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273904 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.181767140E09 +++$+++ Wooohooooooo and all that jazz!   +++$+++ ::::Wooohooooooo and all that jazz!  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] 13:39, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
273908 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273904 +++$+++ 273904 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.181779140E09 +++$+++ You're welcome for the message! :)  +++$+++ *You're welcome for the message! :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
273909 +++$+++ TomasBat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273904 +++$+++ 273904 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.181794620E09 +++$+++ Happy day from me too!  +++$+++ *Happy day from me too! [[User:TomasBat|TomasBat]] 21:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
273910 +++$+++ Chicken7 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273904 +++$+++ 273904 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.181849820E09 +++$+++ OH NO! I'm 1 day late to celebrate Sarahs day. OOOHHHHHH! Happy Sarahs day for yesterday anyway. :D <font color=\"darkblue\"><font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"5\">  +++$+++ *OH NO! I'm 1 day late to celebrate Sarahs day. OOOHHHHHH! Happy Sarahs day for yesterday anyway. :D <font color="darkblue"><font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="5"> [[User:Chicken7|Chicken]]-[[User talk:Chicken7|7]] </font> </font> 12:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

11767 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11767 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-31 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.170281040E09 +++$+++ Hi. Can you please explain what happened with note 109 in that text? I would also like to point out that you are making further referencing of the text incomparably harder and harder to follow or correct.  +++$+++ Hi. Can you please explain what happened with note 109 in that text? I would also like to point out that you are making further referencing of the text incomparably harder and harder to follow or correct. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] 14:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
11768 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11767 +++$+++ 11767 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.170281520E09 +++$+++ Leandrod, I repeat: your version currently features a note with no content (it keeps moving as you are editing, but it is somewhere in the low 100s). Can you please check what you have lost in the process?  +++$+++ :Leandrod, I repeat: your version currently features a note with no content (it keeps moving as you are editing, but it is somewhere in the low 100s). Can you please check what you have lost in the process? [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] 14:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

273914 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-18 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.182191160E09 +++$+++ Totally a mistake, not vandalism. The ref tag for NPOV was blank (someone removed an earlier version), and I was finding it tough to track down the markup. So I copied it into Notepad, used Notepad search, fixed the problem and then copied back. Then I realised I'd made a mistake, so did another edit using the same method. Didn't realise that I'd caused a problem. Guess I'll restrict this method to sections in future... -  +++$+++ Totally a mistake, not vandalism. The ref tag for NPOV was blank (someone removed an earlier version), and I was finding it tough to track down the markup. So I copied it into Notepad, used Notepad search, fixed the problem and then copied back. Then I realised I'd made a mistake, so did another edit using the same method. Didn't realise that I'd caused a problem. Guess I'll restrict this method to sections in future... - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 11:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
273915 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273914 +++$+++ 273914 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.182193200E09 +++$+++ And I knew you knew :-) But I wanted to explain anyway, as I felt like a dumbass on two counts: the first was the thing above, and the second was using the wrong namespace. I'm getting a bit rusty! -  +++$+++ :And I knew you knew :-) But I wanted to explain anyway, as I felt like a dumbass on two counts: the first was the thing above, and the second was using the wrong namespace. I'm getting a bit rusty! - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 12:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

11771 +++$+++ Agent 86 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11771 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.171697280E09 +++$+++ I have added a \"{{[[Template:prod|prod]]}}\" template to the article [[Coastel Offshore Cellular]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also \"[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]\" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at [[Talk:Coastel Offshore Cellular|its talk page]]. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]].  +++$+++ I have added a "{{[[Template:prod|prod]]}}" template to the article [[Coastel Offshore Cellular]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at [[Talk:Coastel Offshore Cellular|its talk page]]. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]]. [[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] 23:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
11772 +++$+++ Agent 86 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11771 +++$+++ 11771 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.171785780E09 +++$+++ I \"prodded\" the article because I do not think the topic meets notability criteria; in particular, [[WP:CORP]], the guideline outlining the criteria for companies. If this article is more than spam or advertising for the company, please expand it to include the basis for which it is notable. Otherwise, I will probably nominate it for deletion at [[WP:AFD|Articles for Deletion]].  +++$+++ *I "prodded" the article because I do not think the topic meets notability criteria; in particular, [[WP:CORP]], the guideline outlining the criteria for companies. If this article is more than spam or advertising for the company, please expand it to include the basis for which it is notable. Otherwise, I will probably nominate it for deletion at [[WP:AFD|Articles for Deletion]]. [[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] 00:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

273918 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-20 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.182345180E09 +++$+++ I was always interested. If you think the time is right, I'm all for it. --  +++$+++ I was always interested. If you think the time is right, I'm all for it. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 06:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
273919 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273918 +++$+++ 273918 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 06:14:00 +++$+++ 1.182345240E09 +++$+++ I'm not a fan of co-nominations myself, but I'm happy to lend my support once the RfA goes live. --  +++$+++ :I'm not a fan of co-nominations myself, but I'm happy to lend my support once the RfA goes live. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 06:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
273920 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273918 +++$+++ 273918 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.182345600E09 +++$+++ I think it'll be a shoe-in, much like yours was :) As broken as RfA currently is (or always was), somehow the good still manage to make it through... --  +++$+++ :I think it'll be a shoe-in, much like yours was :) As broken as RfA currently is (or always was), somehow the good still manage to make it through... -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 06:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
273921 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273918 +++$+++ 273918 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.182346260E09 +++$+++ The phrase \"''lunatics in charge of the asylum''\" comes to mind, but I won't expand on that... not now, not here anyway :) --  +++$+++ :The phrase "''lunatics in charge of the asylum''" comes to mind, but I won't expand on that... not now, not here anyway :) -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 06:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
273922 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273918 +++$+++ 273921 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.182371340E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah - you are a such a lovely person.  I have just got back from some rehearsals to find your pleasant message - and yes the Opera House performance was just stupendous - singing to a packed house along with another 1000 or so choristers and the Sydney Orchestra.  Thank you for the nomination - I am just about to accept and to answer the first question.-- +++$+++ ::Hi Sarah - you are a such a lovely person.  I have just got back from some rehearsals to find your pleasant message - and yes the Opera House performance was just stupendous - singing to a packed house along with another 1000 or so choristers and the Sydney Orchestra.  Thank you for the nomination - I am just about to accept and to answer the first question.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 13:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

11775 +++$+++ Qp10qp +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11775 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.176348000E09 +++$+++ Leandrod, I appreciate all your good-faith help, but you are undoing combined-reference style, which observes a CMS format precisely. The result is now double, treble etc. ref tags which were deliberately deliberately deliberately avoided and which have spoiled the elegant appearance of the text. Anyway, I won't change them back: it will take too long. But the notes no longer enrich each other in the way intended: some of the combinations were very subtle. Surely you couldn't have thought such a style was an accident. (My reference for this noting system is Chicago 15.12: \"The use of more than one note reference at a single text location (such as 5,6) should be rigorously avoided. Instead the notes referred to should be combined into a single note.\")  +++$+++ Leandrod, I appreciate all your good-faith help, but you are undoing combined-reference style, which observes a CMS format precisely. The result is now double, treble etc. ref tags which were deliberately deliberately deliberately avoided and which have spoiled the elegant appearance of the text. Anyway, I won't change them back: it will take too long. But the notes no longer enrich each other in the way intended: some of the combinations were very subtle. Surely you couldn't have thought such a style was an accident. (My reference for this noting system is Chicago 15.12: "The use of more than one note reference at a single text location (such as 5,6) should be rigorously avoided. Instead the notes referred to should be combined into a single note.") [[User:Qp10qp|qp10qp]] 20:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
11776 +++$+++ Qp10qp +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11775 +++$+++ 11775 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.176352320E09 +++$+++ Well, I did consolidate; that was the point of that citation style. I would have one tag for, say, four connected notes. I may unpick some of your restructuring in future, but it's too late to just revert because there's a lot of editing going on there today. As far as CMS being designed for print is concerned, did you know that it is one of the styles recommended by our MoS? I actually think it's a more flexible style than our \"ref name =\", citation templates, and such, which are hard to combine with other references.  +++$+++ :Well, I did consolidate; that was the point of that citation style. I would have one tag for, say, four connected notes. I may unpick some of your restructuring in future, but it's too late to just revert because there's a lot of editing going on there today. As far as CMS being designed for print is concerned, did you know that it is one of the styles recommended by our MoS? I actually think it's a more flexible style than our "ref name =", citation templates, and such, which are hard to combine with other references. [[User:Qp10qp|qp10qp]] 21:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

273923 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-20 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.182375840E09 +++$+++ Hi again Sarah.  Thank you also for your email.  You may  be retired (resting peacefully I hope) for the evening but I leave this message for you now because (and this should get the sympathy vote) as luck would have it I am traveling to Melbourne early tomorrow to visit a dentist for 3 hours of Root Canal Treatment (yeah I know it makes me shiver too) and not coming back until Friday. I will have access to a computer either in the evening on Thursday however if I still find that I am slurping my soup down my chin after the dentist - I will leave computer access until later on Friday when I have driven back.  Anyway I have answered all the questions - I hope in a suitable and succinct way and so ''please'' would you do me the honour of either telling me to get my answers in a better order, or posting my nomination for discussion, or if you think it preferable speaking to Steve first - particularly because a slight delay may help me to not annoy people when I do not answer any additional questions promptly.  I will leave the decision to you. Thank you again.  My best wishes -- +++$+++ Hi again Sarah.  Thank you also for your email.  You may  be retired (resting peacefully I hope) for the evening but I leave this message for you now because (and this should get the sympathy vote) as luck would have it I am traveling to Melbourne early tomorrow to visit a dentist for 3 hours of Root Canal Treatment (yeah I know it makes me shiver too) and not coming back until Friday. I will have access to a computer either in the evening on Thursday however if I still find that I am slurping my soup down my chin after the dentist - I will leave computer access until later on Friday when I have driven back.  Anyway I have answered all the questions - I hope in a suitable and succinct way and so ''please'' would you do me the honour of either telling me to get my answers in a better order, or posting my nomination for discussion, or if you think it preferable speaking to Steve first - particularly because a slight delay may help me to not annoy people when I do not answer any additional questions promptly.  I will leave the decision to you. Thank you again.  My best wishes --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 14:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
273924 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273923 +++$+++ 273923 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.182376800E09 +++$+++ There you go - I thought for sure you'd be asleep.  Yes please to your question - I meant list my nomination at RfA for discussion.  I'll stay up for another 30 minutes or so - just in case you want to tell me that my answers are not quite there.-- +++$+++ *There you go - I thought for sure you'd be asleep.  Yes please to your question - I meant list my nomination at RfA for discussion.  I'll stay up for another 30 minutes or so - just in case you want to tell me that my answers are not quite there.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 15:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
273925 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273923 +++$+++ 273924 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.182377280E09 +++$+++ Thank you - I appreciate your blessing my nomination with its first support vote.  Do you think I should indicate in the General Comments that I am not available (because of the dentist appointment) to  answer questions until Friday - or just leave it?-- +++$+++ **Thank you - I appreciate your blessing my nomination with its first support vote.  Do you think I should indicate in the General Comments that I am not available (because of the dentist appointment) to  answer questions until Friday - or just leave it?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 15:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
273926 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273923 +++$+++ 273923 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.182384840E09 +++$+++ Just so you know, Sarah, that was a message that was left on your user page. I moved it to your talk page for you.  +++$+++ *Just so you know, Sarah, that was a message that was left on your user page. I moved it to your talk page for you. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

273927 +++$+++ Splenda-luva +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273927 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-21 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.182484320E09 +++$+++ Im sorry, but the comment you left on my talk page was quite rude. I have tried being nice about this whole thing but it obviously doesnt seem to be working. The fact that you live in Australia is relivent as you know nothing about this topic. I do, and the information I wrote was correct and NOT original research as i have citations. I am new to wikipedia so im sorry if i didnt sigh this whole thing right. Oh and I add, that you must have no life if all you do is sit on wikipedia and change back things that YOU do not think are appropriate.  +++$+++ Im sorry, but the comment you left on my talk page was quite rude. I have tried being nice about this whole thing but it obviously doesnt seem to be working. The fact that you live in Australia is relivent as you know nothing about this topic. I do, and the information I wrote was correct and NOT original research as i have citations. I am new to wikipedia so im sorry if i didnt sigh this whole thing right. Oh and I add, that you must have no life if all you do is sit on wikipedia and change back things that YOU do not think are appropriate. [[User:Splenda-luva|Splenda-luva]] 20:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
273928 +++$+++ Hiberniantears +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273927 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-22 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.182498120E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, This is clearly a vandal, or seriously wayward user... That said, I am born, raised, and still live in Boston, and I for one appreciate the efforts of those down under keeping an eye on my great city! :-)  +++$+++ :: Hi Sarah, This is clearly a vandal, or seriously wayward user... That said, I am born, raised, and still live in Boston, and I for one appreciate the efforts of those down under keeping an eye on my great city! :-) [[User:Hiberniantears|Hiberniantears]] 00:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
273929 +++$+++ Hiberniantears +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273927 +++$+++ 273927 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.182851460E09 +++$+++ This is of no real significance, I suppose, but I watchlisted a few of Splenda-Luva's pages the other day (Menino was alreadt on my list), and I came up with this: Category:Suspected sockpuppets of Splenda-luva. Like I said... not really important, but just in the event this user crosses your path again.  +++$+++ *This is of no real significance, I suppose, but I watchlisted a few of Splenda-Luva's pages the other day (Menino was alreadt on my list), and I came up with this: Category:Suspected sockpuppets of Splenda-luva. Like I said... not really important, but just in the event this user crosses your path again. [[User:Hiberniantears|Hiberniantears]] 02:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

536072 +++$+++ Quiddity +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-22 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.151033580E09 +++$+++ What experience\/training do you have in the collection\/calculation\/analysis of statistics? - +++$+++ What experience/training do you have in the collection/calculation/analysis of statistics? -[[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] 20:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
536073 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536072 +++$+++ 536072 +++$+++ 2006-06-22 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.151033880E09 +++$+++ Do you know what I do in real life. I have some experience creating statistics. +++$+++ :Do you know what I do in real life. I have some experience creating statistics.[[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 20:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
536074 +++$+++ Quiddity +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536072 +++$+++ 536073 +++$+++ 2006-06-22 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.151034600E09 +++$+++ It's a lot more rewarding to write\/edit articles, and that's the most valuable contribution anyone can make! (seriously :) - +++$+++ ::It's a lot more rewarding to write/edit articles, and that's the most valuable contribution anyone can make! (seriously :) -[[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] 20:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
536075 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536072 +++$+++ 536074 +++$+++ 2006-06-22 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.151038080E09 +++$+++ As you say here,Be Bold. This group will have no honorifics, unless you consider Coordinator and Maintainer a honorific. I am collecting data to determine where more resources are needed.  +++$+++ :::As you say here,Be Bold. This group will have no honorifics, unless you consider Coordinator and Maintainer a honorific. I am collecting data to determine where more resources are needed. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 21:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
536076 +++$+++ Quiddity +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536072 +++$+++ 536075 +++$+++ 2006-06-22 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.151039100E09 +++$+++ That didnt really answer any of the above questions. (please keep replies here. thanks.) - +++$+++ ::::That didnt really answer any of the above questions. (please keep replies here. thanks.) -[[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] 22:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
536077 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536072 +++$+++ 536072 +++$+++ 2006-06-22 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.151042340E09 +++$+++ The purpose is to see where Wikipedia needs resources, to ensure that resources go to where they are needed. The specialist project will show where Wikipedia admins specialize in the least, which will show where more focus is needed. +++$+++ :The purpose is to see where Wikipedia needs resources, to ensure that resources go to where they are needed. The specialist project will show where Wikipedia admins specialize in the least, which will show where more focus is needed.[[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 22:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
536078 +++$+++ Quiddity +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536072 +++$+++ 536077 +++$+++ 2006-06-22 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.151044140E09 +++$+++ Thanks. - +++$+++ ::Thanks. -[[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] 23:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

11786 +++$+++ Oreo Priest +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-11 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.192164240E09 +++$+++ Sorry I undid some of your changes to the article; the quote template did not display at all correctly, so I reverted it quickly so incoming readers would have an easier time reading it. I apologize for undoing some of your other edits by association, I was just trying to act quickly. -''' +++$+++ Sorry I undid some of your changes to the article; the quote template did not display at all correctly, so I reverted it quickly so incoming readers would have an easier time reading it. I apologize for undoing some of your other edits by association, I was just trying to act quickly. -'''[[User:Oreo Priest|<span style="color:green">Oreo Priest</span>]]''' 21:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
11787 +++$+++ Oreo Priest +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11786 +++$+++ 11786 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.192166460E09 +++$+++ It turns out the syntax error was due to the space between the | and the body of the quote as in: <nowiki>{{quote | BODY...<\/nowiki> as opposed to <nowiki>{{quote |BODY...<\/nowiki>. I fixed the formatting without reverting your other edits this time, but I'm puzzled that it did display correctly for you; I've never seen any exception to incorrect display when a line (or argument in a template) begins with a space. -''' +++$+++ :It turns out the syntax error was due to the space between the | and the body of the quote as in: <nowiki>{{quote | BODY...</nowiki> as opposed to <nowiki>{{quote |BODY...</nowiki>. I fixed the formatting without reverting your other edits this time, but I'm puzzled that it did display correctly for you; I've never seen any exception to incorrect display when a line (or argument in a template) begins with a space. -'''[[User:Oreo Priest|<span style="color:green">Oreo Priest</span>]]''' 22:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

569943 +++$+++ Mattl2001 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569943 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-01 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.180698240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the helpful comments. I really appreciate the feedback. I have a few questions concerning your comments on my RfA. First off, what are diffs? How can I use them? Secondly, what would you consider with admin-related tasks?  +++$+++ Thanks for the helpful comments. I really appreciate the feedback. I have a few questions concerning your comments on my RfA. First off, what are diffs? How can I use them? Secondly, what would you consider with admin-related tasks? [[User:Mattl2001|Mattl2001]] 04:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
569944 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569943 +++$+++ 569943 +++$+++ 2007-06-01 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.180700340E09 +++$+++ Hello!  Diffs look like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3A%28aeropagitica%29&diff=135016375&oldid=135016310 this] and clearly show the '''differences''' between edits, in addition to the edit summary that is used to justify making a change.  You can see how much easier it is to see evidence presented in this way as opposed to having to dig through what is usually several thousand edits' worth of contributions on the part of an RfA candidate.  You should always be prepared to justify your statements on Wikipedia, whether it be accusing someone of vandalism or showing the community why you should be an admin.  As for admin-related tasks that an editor can do, you can patrol the new pages and recent changes on the lookout for vandalism and either revert and warn and\/or report persistent vandals to [[:WP:AIV]] for action when they have received their fourth-level warning; contribute to XfD discussions, using these as an opportunity to show how your opinions are based upon the [[:WP:POLICY|policies and guidelines]]; there are others, take a look at [[:Wikipedia:Administrators]] to see the range of things in which we participate and go from there.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello!  Diffs look like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A%28aeropagitica%29&diff=135016375&oldid=135016310 this] and clearly show the '''differences''' between edits, in addition to the edit summary that is used to justify making a change.  You can see how much easier it is to see evidence presented in this way as opposed to having to dig through what is usually several thousand edits' worth of contributions on the part of an RfA candidate.  You should always be prepared to justify your statements on Wikipedia, whether it be accusing someone of vandalism or showing the community why you should be an admin.  As for admin-related tasks that an editor can do, you can patrol the new pages and recent changes on the lookout for vandalism and either revert and warn and/or report persistent vandals to [[:WP:AIV]] for action when they have received their fourth-level warning; contribute to XfD discussions, using these as an opportunity to show how your opinions are based upon the [[:WP:POLICY|policies and guidelines]]; there are others, take a look at [[:Wikipedia:Administrators]] to see the range of things in which we participate and go from there.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 05:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

273932 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-22 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.182532080E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah - I hope you have had a couple of good days?  I am back from the dentist - inclusive of sore jaw and empty wallet.  I received a new question from AldeBaer which I have now answered and things look quite positive at my RfA (god there are some lovely people on this project).  I have a question for you though if I may?  It seems to me that the general guidelines for RfA are not to thank your voters (Support, Oppose or Neutral) but that plenty do anyway.  I would like to thank all voters but before the end of the RfA in the form of the draft message shown '''[[User:VirtualSteve\/Sandbox|here]]''' for you.  Can you comment on this proposal please?-- +++$+++ Hi Sarah - I hope you have had a couple of good days?  I am back from the dentist - inclusive of sore jaw and empty wallet.  I received a new question from AldeBaer which I have now answered and things look quite positive at my RfA (god there are some lovely people on this project).  I have a question for you though if I may?  It seems to me that the general guidelines for RfA are not to thank your voters (Support, Oppose or Neutral) but that plenty do anyway.  I would like to thank all voters but before the end of the RfA in the form of the draft message shown '''[[User:VirtualSteve/Sandbox|here]]''' for you.  Can you comment on this proposal please?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 10:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
273933 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273932 +++$+++ 273932 +++$+++ 2007-06-22 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.182533760E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah - Dentist wasn't too bad (well who can love an appointment like that ever but it wasn't as bad as it could have been) In terms of canvassing yes I don't want to do that at all and hopefully wrote my thank you so that it didn't\/wouldn't.  But I will take your advice (which is becoming a pleasant habit :) ) and adjust it to thank everyone after the RfA is finished.  Best wishes as always.-- +++$+++ *Thanks Sarah - Dentist wasn't too bad (well who can love an appointment like that ever but it wasn't as bad as it could have been) In terms of canvassing yes I don't want to do that at all and hopefully wrote my thank you so that it didn't/wouldn't.  But I will take your advice (which is becoming a pleasant habit :) ) and adjust it to thank everyone after the RfA is finished.  Best wishes as always.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 10:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

11789 +++$+++ Kablammo +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-20 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.195596900E09 +++$+++ Re this edit: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Trunk_deck_ship&diff=172682273&oldid=172681844] -- I agree with you that the form ''1900s'' is to be preferred to ''1900's'', but the title of the drawing itself uses the latter, and that title was used verbatim.  Should it be changed to the correct form?  It's a trivial point; I'm just wondering how such matters should be handled.  Regards,  +++$+++ Re this edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trunk_deck_ship&diff=172682273&oldid=172681844] -- I agree with you that the form ''1900s'' is to be preferred to ''1900's'', but the title of the drawing itself uses the latter, and that title was used verbatim.  Should it be changed to the correct form?  It's a trivial point; I'm just wondering how such matters should be handled.  Regards, [[User:Kablammo|Kablammo]] ([[User talk:Kablammo|talk]]) 14:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
11790 +++$+++ Kablammo +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11789 +++$+++ 11789 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.195607520E09 +++$+++ The discussion farther up on this page notes that combined referencing is an acceptable format on Wikipedia as well as in print media.  I chose that format because it goes well with a footnote\/source method where both on-line and print media are sourced.  I believe it presents a better appearance, and also allows for discussion of an online source within a single footnote (not yet present here, but which could be added in the future.)  [[User:Kablammo|Kablammo]] ([[User talk:Kablammo|talk]]) 14:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)  I partially restored the former citation format, but did not repeat single-source footnotes.   +++$+++ :The discussion farther up on this page notes that combined referencing is an acceptable format on Wikipedia as well as in print media.  I chose that format because it goes well with a footnote/source method where both on-line and print media are sourced.  I believe it presents a better appearance, and also allows for discussion of an online source within a single footnote (not yet present here, but which could be added in the future.)  [[User:Kablammo|Kablammo]] ([[User talk:Kablammo|talk]]) 14:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)  I partially restored the former citation format, but did not repeat single-source footnotes.  [[User:Kablammo|Kablammo]] ([[User talk:Kablammo|talk]]) 17:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

273934 +++$+++ 211.28.83.179 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-22 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.182547620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:211.28.83.179|211.28.83.179]] 14:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
273935 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273934 +++$+++ 273934 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.182884640E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but I haven't really done much work on the article, just general administrative work (blocking, reverting, deleting, protecting etc). Thanks for your message, though. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Thanks, but I haven't really done much work on the article, just general administrative work (blocking, reverting, deleting, protecting etc). Thanks for your message, though. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 12:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

273936 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273936 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-22 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.182554760E09 +++$+++ That brings me to another thing: the RfA monitor on your user page isn't working properly for some reason. It's only showing a few RfAs when there are actually several more going. I don't know if you're aware of this problem but I thought I'd tell you.  +++$+++ That brings me to another thing: the RfA monitor on your user page isn't working properly for some reason. It's only showing a few RfAs when there are actually several more going. I don't know if you're aware of this problem but I thought I'd tell you. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
273937 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273936 +++$+++ 273936 +++$+++ 2007-06-24 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.182725160E09 +++$+++ Sorry Sarah, the second part of my message is now out of date. Your monitor is working again. No cause for concern anymore. :)  +++$+++ :Sorry Sarah, the second part of my message is now out of date. Your monitor is working again. No cause for concern anymore. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 15:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
273938 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273936 +++$+++ 273936 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.182903420E09 +++$+++ There's no need to apologize to me about not responding quickly; I understand. As for why I use your user page: it's just something I've become used to. I believe I've used your user page to monitor the RfA's since Ryan Postlethwaite's RfA from nearly four months ago; it's just more convenient than going to any other place; and, as I said, I'm just used to doing it. What I said on VirtualSteve's RfA is completely true: your candidates ''do'' have a habit of becoming excellent administrators (I mean that in a good way); Newyorkbrad and Riana are proof of that. :)  +++$+++ *There's no need to apologize to me about not responding quickly; I understand. As for why I use your user page: it's just something I've become used to. I believe I've used your user page to monitor the RfA's since Ryan Postlethwaite's RfA from nearly four months ago; it's just more convenient than going to any other place; and, as I said, I'm just used to doing it. What I said on VirtualSteve's RfA is completely true: your candidates ''do'' have a habit of becoming excellent administrators (I mean that in a good way); Newyorkbrad and Riana are proof of that. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

273939 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273939 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-25 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.182770220E09 +++$+++ You have email... -- +++$+++ You have email... --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 04:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
273940 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273939 +++$+++ 273939 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.182884640E09 +++$+++ Got it VS and shall reply soon. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Got it VS and shall reply soon. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 12:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

536085 +++$+++ Mr Tan +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536085 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-28 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.151522160E09 +++$+++ How can we, correct [[User:Fabshelly]]'s conception of wikipedia? Do we have to resort to banning him from Wikipedia, like [[User:Paektu]]? As an anti-vandal, I truly need your guidance, since I'm very poor at dealing such matters. I don't think semi-protecting the article can sufficiently protect against these parties, especially Fabshelly who is a registered user. Anyway, I have posted a defence statement against Fabshelly's allegations against me on [[Talk:Bae Yong Joon]].  +++$+++ How can we, correct [[User:Fabshelly]]'s conception of wikipedia? Do we have to resort to banning him from Wikipedia, like [[User:Paektu]]? As an anti-vandal, I truly need your guidance, since I'm very poor at dealing such matters. I don't think semi-protecting the article can sufficiently protect against these parties, especially Fabshelly who is a registered user. Anyway, I have posted a defence statement against Fabshelly's allegations against me on [[Talk:Bae Yong Joon]]. [[User:Mr Tan|Mr Tan]] 12:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
536086 +++$+++ Mr Tan +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536085 +++$+++ 536085 +++$+++ 2006-06-29 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.151588340E09 +++$+++ Since it's Fabshelly who wanted large scale meditation by starting the page, [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal\/Cases\/2006-06-25 Bae Yong Joon]], let's see what he has to say before I proceed. Otherwise we all discuss on [[Talk:Bae Yong Joon]] in the meantime.  +++$+++ :Since it's Fabshelly who wanted large scale meditation by starting the page, [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-06-25 Bae Yong Joon]], let's see what he has to say before I proceed. Otherwise we all discuss on [[Talk:Bae Yong Joon]] in the meantime. [[User:Mr Tan|Mr Tan]] 06:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

11798 +++$+++ Ed Fitzgerald +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-11 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.226424720E09 +++$+++ I do not understand the typographical changes you've been making, substituting something (I'm not sure what) for apostrophes.  After your change to [[The Magnificent Ambersons (film)]], a search for \"can't\" brought up nothing found, although it was clearly there in the article.  Whatever you substituted for the apostrophe was not recognized by the browser's search function.<p>Can you explain, please, the purpose of these changes, and justify them?  If they confuse search functions, my feeling is that they should all be reverted. <b><i> +++$+++ I do not understand the typographical changes you've been making, substituting something (I'm not sure what) for apostrophes.  After your change to [[The Magnificent Ambersons (film)]], a search for "can't" brought up nothing found, although it was clearly there in the article.  Whatever you substituted for the apostrophe was not recognized by the browser's search function.<p>Can you explain, please, the purpose of these changes, and justify them?  If they confuse search functions, my feeling is that they should all be reverted. <b><i>[[User:Ed Fitzgerald|Ed Fitzgerald]]</i> <sub>[[User talk:Ed Fitzgerald|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ed Fitzgerald|c]]</sub></b> 09:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
11799 +++$+++ Ed Fitzgerald +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11798 +++$+++ 11798 +++$+++ 2008-11-11 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.226465100E09 +++$+++ I agree that \"can't\" should be avoided, but that's hardly the point.  Your change has put words with apostrophes outside the reach of search engines.  Please stop, and please revert the changes you have made to this point. <b><i> +++$+++ :I agree that "can't" should be avoided, but that's hardly the point.  Your change has put words with apostrophes outside the reach of search engines.  Please stop, and please revert the changes you have made to this point. <b><i>[[User:Ed Fitzgerald|Ed Fitzgerald]]</i> <sub>[[User talk:Ed Fitzgerald|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ed Fitzgerald|c]]</sub></b> 20:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
11800 +++$+++ Ed Fitzgerald +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11798 +++$+++ 11799 +++$+++ 2008-11-11 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.226466360E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Unhelpful_typographical_changes.3F | This report]] at WP:ANI concerns the changes you've made. <b><i> +++$+++ ::[[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Unhelpful_typographical_changes.3F | This report]] at WP:ANI concerns the changes you've made. <b><i>[[User:Ed Fitzgerald|Ed Fitzgerald]]</i> <sub>[[User talk:Ed Fitzgerald|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ed Fitzgerald|c]]</sub></b> 21:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

438873 +++$+++ Brownlee +++$+++ Wernher +++$+++ 438873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-11 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.144782480E09 +++$+++ Please may I draw your attention to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village%20pump%20%28policy%29&oldid=52395151#Guidelines_for_Wikipedia_lists_of_ethnic_groups Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Guidelines for Wikipedia lists of ethnic groups]. Your contributions would be very welcome. --  +++$+++ Please may I draw your attention to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village%20pump%20%28policy%29&oldid=52395151#Guidelines_for_Wikipedia_lists_of_ethnic_groups Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Guidelines for Wikipedia lists of ethnic groups]. Your contributions would be very welcome. -- [[User:Brownlee|Brownlee]] 12:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
438874 +++$+++ Wernher +++$+++ Wernher +++$+++ 438873 +++$+++ 438873 +++$+++ 2006-04-13 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.144964880E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks! I have pitched in now. -- +++$+++ :Hey, thanks! I have pitched in now. --[[User:Wernher|Wernher]] 14:48, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

11801 +++$+++ AniMate +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-12 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.226491440E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:AniMate|<font face="papyrus" color="Black">A</font>]][[Special:Contributions/AniMate|<font face="papyrus" color="Green">ni</font>]][[User talk:AniMate|<font face="papyrus" color="Black">Mate</font>]] 04:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
11802 +++$+++ EdJohnston +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11801 +++$+++ 11801 +++$+++ 2008-11-12 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.226539920E09 +++$+++ Hello Leandrod.  Having seen the thread at [[WP:ANI]], my opinion is that all of your apostrophe replacements ought to be rolled back. If you have a comment on this, please reply either here or in the ANI thread. After discussion, if the consensus is that the original apostrophes are better, I hope we can persuade you to go back and undo the apostrophe changes. I notice that you've made other improvements, besides the apostrophes, and those should not be affected. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Hello Leandrod.  Having seen the thread at [[WP:ANI]], my opinion is that all of your apostrophe replacements ought to be rolled back. If you have a comment on this, please reply either here or in the ANI thread. After discussion, if the consensus is that the original apostrophes are better, I hope we can persuade you to go back and undo the apostrophe changes. I notice that you've made other improvements, besides the apostrophes, and those should not be affected. Thanks, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
11803 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11801 +++$+++ 11802 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.226637300E09 +++$+++ I haven\u2019t found \u0111e \xf0read there, do you have a more precise and stable URI?  Anyway, as much as I disagree wi\xf0 the manual of style on \u0111at point, on grounds of style, feel free to revert to typewriter apostrophes.  I won\u2019t revert \u0111em myself, because I have been fixing \u0111at and other ugly typewriter idioms for ages wi\xf0out no-one ever complaining, and I won\u2019t just revert my \xf0ousands of edits.  \xd0ere are better ways of spending one\u2019s life.  By the way, is that specific instruction in the manual of style any\xf0ing new?   +++$+++ ::I haven’t found đe ðread there, do you have a more precise and stable URI?  Anyway, as much as I disagree wið the manual of style on đat point, on grounds of style, feel free to revert to typewriter apostrophes.  I won’t revert đem myself, because I have been fixing đat and other ugly typewriter idioms for ages wiðout no-one ever complaining, and I won’t just revert my ðousands of edits.  Ðere are better ways of spending one’s life.  By the way, is that specific instruction in the manual of style anyðing new?  [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] ([[User talk:Leandrod#top|talk]]) 20:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
11804 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11801 +++$+++ 11803 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.226637960E09 +++$+++ Stop the pre\xdfes \u2014 [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style#Straight_vs._curly_quotation_marks | The talk page on the Manual of Style]] says there is no need of reverting.   +++$+++ :::Stop the preßes — [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style#Straight_vs._curly_quotation_marks | The talk page on the Manual of Style]] says there is no need of reverting.  [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] ([[User talk:Leandrod#top|talk]]) 20:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
11805 +++$+++ Ed Fitzgerald +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11801 +++$+++ 11804 +++$+++ 2008-11-14 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.226681760E09 +++$+++ A quick glance at this talk page is enough to show that these are hardly the first complaints you've received about your rather [[WP:POINT]]y crusade.  And, why are you using non-Roman letters in your comments?  This is English Wikipedia, not Anglo-Saxon Wikipedia, please use the letters which are normally associated with English, the odd letters make it very difficult to read what you've written. <b><i> +++$+++ ::::A quick glance at this talk page is enough to show that these are hardly the first complaints you've received about your rather [[WP:POINT]]y crusade.  And, why are you using non-Roman letters in your comments?  This is English Wikipedia, not Anglo-Saxon Wikipedia, please use the letters which are normally associated with English, the odd letters make it very difficult to read what you've written. <b><i>[[User:Ed Fitzgerald|Ed Fitzgerald]]</i> <sub>[[User talk:Ed Fitzgerald|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ed Fitzgerald|c]]</sub></b> 08:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
11806 +++$+++ Jayron32 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11801 +++$+++ 11801 +++$+++ 2008-11-14 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.226695920E09 +++$+++ Indeed, the whole-sale changing of typographical conventions in ways that are against the [[WP:MOS|manual of style]] is a bad idea.  The greater problem, however, is that others are challenging these edits as unhelpful, and you continue to make them.  If such behavior continues, it may be stopped by an administrator who may take action to stop it against your will.  No one wants this, so please stop this action until there exists widespread support for it.  Thank you.  -- +++$+++ :Indeed, the whole-sale changing of typographical conventions in ways that are against the [[WP:MOS|manual of style]] is a bad idea.  The greater problem, however, is that others are challenging these edits as unhelpful, and you continue to make them.  If such behavior continues, it may be stopped by an administrator who may take action to stop it against your will.  No one wants this, so please stop this action until there exists widespread support for it.  Thank you.  --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 12:52, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
11807 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11801 +++$+++ 11805 +++$+++ 2008-11-14 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.226704860E09 +++$+++ Not so simple, I have learned a bit and refrained from doing stuff people complained about.  +++$+++ :::::Not so simple, I have learned a bit and refrained from doing stuff people complained about. [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] ([[User talk:Leandrod#top|talk]]) 15:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
11808 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11801 +++$+++ 11806 +++$+++ 2008-11-15 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.226801700E09 +++$+++ If you look properly, the section I edited had a mix of curly and typewrite quotes before I edited it.  And please, sign your messages.  +++$+++ ::If you look properly, the section I edited had a mix of curly and typewrite quotes before I edited it.  And please, sign your messages. [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] ([[User talk:Leandrod#top|talk]]) 18:15, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

536090 +++$+++ Digitalme +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-30 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.151653500E09 +++$+++ That's for you to decide.  If you can remove the beaurocracy, and make the mission achievable, and not get the whole thing deleted, power to you.  I really don't know what can be done, honestly.--<b>[[User:Digitalme|digital_m]] +++$+++ That's for you to decide.  If you can remove the beaurocracy, and make the mission achievable, and not get the whole thing deleted, power to you.  I really don't know what can be done, honestly.--<b>[[User:Digitalme|digital_m]][[User:Digitalme/EA|<span style="color:green;">e</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Digitalme|Talk]]ˑ[[Special:Contributions/Digitalme|Contribs]])</sup></b> 00:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
536091 +++$+++ Digitalme +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536090 +++$+++ 536090 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.151654580E09 +++$+++ Well, you've got the steering council, which, by its nature is exclusive to users, and it appears that this SC sets the whole direction of ISG.  If you could possibly even complete your mission, not many wikipedians would become involved, because Wikipedia is [[WP:CON|based on consensus]].--<b>[[User:Digitalme|digital_m]] +++$+++ :Well, you've got the steering council, which, by its nature is exclusive to users, and it appears that this SC sets the whole direction of ISG.  If you could possibly even complete your mission, not many wikipedians would become involved, because Wikipedia is [[WP:CON|based on consensus]].--<b>[[User:Digitalme|digital_m]][[User:Digitalme/EA|<span style="color:green;">e</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Digitalme|Talk]]ˑ[[Special:Contributions/Digitalme|Contribs]])</sup></b> 01:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
536092 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536090 +++$+++ 536091 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.151663640E09 +++$+++ More than just the bureaucracy, I just don't understand what this is.  As I mentioned above, please list statistics of what you are compiling, how you intend to compile them, and the reasons why you are compiling them.  As is, I don't really see the point of this WikiProject.  Sorry --  +++$+++ ::More than just the bureaucracy, I just don't understand what this is.  As I mentioned above, please list statistics of what you are compiling, how you intend to compile them, and the reasons why you are compiling them.  As is, I don't really see the point of this WikiProject.  Sorry -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|Samir]]   <small>[[User_talk:Samir_(The_Scope)|धर्म]]</small> 03:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

273950 +++$+++ Buickid +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273950 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-01 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.183308120E09 +++$+++ Um. I'm just mike42's friend. =D -- +++$+++ Um. I'm just mike42's friend. =D --[[User:Buickid|CableModem^_^]] 09:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
273951 +++$+++ MichaelBillington +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273950 +++$+++ 273950 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.183308420E09 +++$+++ Good, good.  At least ''some'' people on this planet are still sane *high five* <small>(Mike42 is my IRC nick by the way, incase you were wondering)<\/small> -- +++$+++ :Good, good.  At least ''some'' people on this planet are still sane *high five* <small>(Mike42 is my IRC nick by the way, incase you were wondering)</small> --[[User:MichaelBillington|Michael Billington]] ([[User talk:MichaelBillington|talk]]) 09:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
273952 +++$+++ Buickid +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273950 +++$+++ 273951 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.183308780E09 +++$+++ I kinda like pie. -- +++$+++ ::I kinda like pie. --[[User:Buickid|CableModem^_^]] 09:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
273953 +++$+++ FenderTele +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273950 +++$+++ 273952 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.183441320E09 +++$+++ Is anyone forgetting that the Hawks won!? +++$+++ :::Is anyone forgetting that the Hawks won!?[[User:FenderTele|<font color="#690">Fender</font><font color="#000">Tele</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:FenderTele|<font color="#690">Criticise</font>]]</sup> 22:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
273954 +++$+++ MichaelBillington +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273950 +++$+++ 273953 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.183455600E09 +++$+++ Yes, absolutely. Move along now :) -- +++$+++ ::::Yes, absolutely. Move along now :) --[[User:MichaelBillington|Michael Billington]] ([[User talk:MichaelBillington|talk]]) 02:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
273955 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273950 +++$+++ 273952 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.183446180E09 +++$+++ I kinda like pie, too. Eating pie. Eating Colliewobble pie. ''' +++$+++ :::I kinda like pie, too. Eating pie. Eating Colliewobble pie. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 00:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
273956 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273950 +++$+++ 273951 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.183446900E09 +++$+++ I didn't know that magpies were classed as vegetables?? ''' +++$+++ ::I didn't know that magpies were classed as vegetables?? '''[[User:Blnguyen|Blnguyen]]'''  ([[User talk:Blnguyen|bananabucket]]) 00:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
273957 +++$+++ MichaelBillington +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273950 +++$+++ 273950 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.183455600E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is your final warning. Your recent edits [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Sarah&diff=142125231&oldid=142111813] will not be tolerated. Editing other people's comments to make them say such horrendous things will get you blocked.<!-- Template:uw-hawks-fan4 --> :) -- +++$+++ :[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is your final warning. Your recent edits [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sarah&diff=142125231&oldid=142111813] will not be tolerated. Editing other people's comments to make them say such horrendous things will get you blocked.<!-- Template:uw-hawks-fan4 --> :) --[[User:MichaelBillington|Michael Billington]] ([[User talk:MichaelBillington|talk]]) 02:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

536096 +++$+++ Renata3 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536096 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-26 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.153971840E09 +++$+++ Hi, I am ''very'' glad you are interested! But you should really check with Childzy who sort of took the advantage of \"first come first served.\" Besides, I am a bit worried about your edit count... A lot of those mottos refer to really nerdy WP stuff you might not be familiar with... But there is nothing some more experience could not fix ;) So anyway, talk with Childzy and see if you can work out something.  +++$+++ Hi, I am ''very'' glad you are interested! But you should really check with Childzy who sort of took the advantage of "first come first served." Besides, I am a bit worried about your edit count... A lot of those mottos refer to really nerdy WP stuff you might not be familiar with... But there is nothing some more experience could not fix ;) So anyway, talk with Childzy and see if you can work out something. [[User:Renata3|Renata]] 20:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
536097 +++$+++ childzy +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536096 +++$+++ 536096 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.154029320E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for asking, would love to have you helping out. I go on holiday for 2 weeks on around the 4th august so it would be good to have two of us working on it to cover for such holdays. The first things we need to do is get this project some more publicity around wikipedia, i think the mottos are great!! Then we need to go through the list of suggestions and add them to the approved list. We can both add to the schedule when it is needed, i think it would be best to keep a maybe 2 weeks ahead. If you have any questions about anything just talk on my talk page.  +++$+++ :Hey, thanks for asking, would love to have you helping out. I go on holiday for 2 weeks on around the 4th august so it would be good to have two of us working on it to cover for such holdays. The first things we need to do is get this project some more publicity around wikipedia, i think the mottos are great!! Then we need to go through the list of suggestions and add them to the approved list. We can both add to the schedule when it is needed, i think it would be best to keep a maybe 2 weeks ahead. If you have any questions about anything just talk on my talk page. [[User:childzy|<font color="#990066">Ch</font><font color="#67E6EC">ild</font><font color="#990066">zy</font>]] <sup>([[User_talk:childzy|<font color="#67E6EC">Talk</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Childzy|<font color="#990066">Contribs</font>]])</sup> 12:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

11809 +++$+++ DrKiernan +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11809 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-14 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.226713980E09 +++$+++ In your edit summary you also use the word \"concision\". You may be interested to know that although \"concision\" means \"conciseness\" in Latin-languages such as French, in English it has a double meaning and is often taken to mean \"mutilation\". Particularly amongst those familiar with its use in biblical phrases such as \"the valley of concision\".  +++$+++ In your edit summary you also use the word "concision". You may be interested to know that although "concision" means "conciseness" in Latin-languages such as French, in English it has a double meaning and is often taken to mean "mutilation". Particularly amongst those familiar with its use in biblical phrases such as "the valley of concision". [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 17:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
11810 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11809 +++$+++ 11809 +++$+++ 2008-11-15 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.226801700E09 +++$+++ Thank you!  +++$+++ : Thank you! [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] ([[User talk:Leandrod#top|talk]]) 18:15, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

307803 +++$+++ Mais oui! +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-23 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.153701360E09 +++$+++ I think that this is a rather important discussion for editors interested in Scotland-related articles, especially Scottish politics and Scottish biographical articles (particularly local history). Please have a read and ponder, and contribute to the debate if you like. Thanks. -- +++$+++ I think that this is a rather important discussion for editors interested in Scotland-related articles, especially Scottish politics and Scottish biographical articles (particularly local history). Please have a read and ponder, and contribute to the debate if you like. Thanks. --[[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] 17:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
307804 +++$+++ BrownHairedGirl +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307803 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-23 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.153702500E09 +++$+++ It would also be relevant in this context to consider the discussions in the parent category for the UK parliament: [[Category talk:British MPs]].  I find it regrettable that [[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] has engaged in a restructuring of that category without entering into the discussions there.  -- +++$+++ ::It would also be relevant in this context to consider the discussions in the parent category for the UK parliament: [[Category talk:British MPs]].  I find it regrettable that [[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] has engaged in a restructuring of that category without entering into the discussions there.  --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|BrownHairedGirl]] 17:55, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
307805 +++$+++ Mais oui! +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307803 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.154364000E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion\/Log\/2006_July_23#Category:Members_of_the_United_Kingdom_Parliament_from_Scottish_constituencies]] is just about to close. I would really appreciate your contribution, because this debate needs some serious input. -- +++$+++ :::[[Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_July_23#Category:Members_of_the_United_Kingdom_Parliament_from_Scottish_constituencies]] is just about to close. I would really appreciate your contribution, because this debate needs some serious input. --[[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] 09:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
307806 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307803 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.154386500E09 +++$+++ Mais, I've had a look at the discussion and frankly it's a bit over my head. Thanks for the heads-up anyway. .. +++$+++ :::::Mais, I've had a look at the discussion and frankly it's a bit over my head. Thanks for the heads-up anyway. ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

11812 +++$+++ Johnuniq +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11812 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-15 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.234715220E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ansel_Adams&diff=prev&oldid=270763455 This edit] changes \"pp. 73\u201374\" to \"pp. 73\u20134\" which might be ok, although it seems unhelpful to me. I think that spelling out \"73\u201374\" would be better. Moreover [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Pope_Urban_II&diff=prev&oldid=270715276 this edit] is confusing because it changes years \"1084\u20131100\" to \"1084\u2013100\". Another [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Albert_Norden&diff=prev&oldid=261687395 edit] changes years \"1931-1933\" to \"1931\u20133\" which can be defended, but why would it be an improvement? -- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ansel_Adams&diff=prev&oldid=270763455 This edit] changes "pp. 73–74" to "pp. 73–4" which might be ok, although it seems unhelpful to me. I think that spelling out "73–74" would be better. Moreover [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pope_Urban_II&diff=prev&oldid=270715276 this edit] is confusing because it changes years "1084–1100" to "1084–100". Another [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albert_Norden&diff=prev&oldid=261687395 edit] changes years "1931-1933" to "1931–3" which can be defended, but why would it be an improvement? --[[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 08:27, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
11813 +++$+++ Johnuniq +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11812 +++$+++ 11812 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.234796940E09 +++$+++ For reference, I found a not very illuminating [[WT:Manual_of_Style\/Archive_106#Small_ranges_of_relatively_large_numbers|discussion]]. -- +++$+++ :For reference, I found a not very illuminating [[WT:Manual_of_Style/Archive_106#Small_ranges_of_relatively_large_numbers|discussion]]. --[[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 07:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
11814 +++$+++ Johnuniq +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11812 +++$+++ 11813 +++$+++ 2009-02-17 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.234893240E09 +++$+++ I see what you mean that a good argument can be made to use various different space characters. Of course different platforms and different browsers will probably have some troubles with these for a few more years. I haven't had to deal with that issue on WP. -- +++$+++ ::I see what you mean that a good argument can be made to use various different space characters. Of course different platforms and different browsers will probably have some troubles with these for a few more years. I haven't had to deal with that issue on WP. --[[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 09:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

273958 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.183611060E09 +++$+++ I decided to wait to respond to your message for obvious reasons. Anyway, thanks for your support this time round. Yes, you did live up to the Barnstar I gave you three months ago. I am glad you were consistent in writing another long vote. As for what you said, don't worry, if I need help, I'll ask Ryan, Alison, Chrislk02, Newyorkbrad, you, etc. I would much rather ask for help when I need it instead of make a mess. Thank you again. :)  +++$+++ I decided to wait to respond to your message for obvious reasons. Anyway, thanks for your support this time round. Yes, you did live up to the Barnstar I gave you three months ago. I am glad you were consistent in writing another long vote. As for what you said, don't worry, if I need help, I'll ask Ryan, Alison, Chrislk02, Newyorkbrad, you, etc. I would much rather ask for help when I need it instead of make a mess. Thank you again. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 21:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
273959 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273958 +++$+++ 273958 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.183557600E09 +++$+++ If you are going to quote me, please do so accurately. I never called anything \"fishy\" and I see nothing \"uncouth\" in my comment. It may not be fair, but the fact remains that the nominator and the nominator's reputation can have a massive influence on requests for adminship. You said your short nom is attributed to your having never nominated someone before. I see it as being attributed to the fact that you haven't looked at any other noms before and don't know what is expected. The fact you have taken my comment so bitterly and personally also shows that you haven't much idea about RfA and how it works. Which, of course, is fine, we all have to start somewhere, but please don't come here calling me \"uncouth\" and accusing me of saying things I have not said. ''' +++$+++ :If you are going to quote me, please do so accurately. I never called anything "fishy" and I see nothing "uncouth" in my comment. It may not be fair, but the fact remains that the nominator and the nominator's reputation can have a massive influence on requests for adminship. You said your short nom is attributed to your having never nominated someone before. I see it as being attributed to the fact that you haven't looked at any other noms before and don't know what is expected. The fact you have taken my comment so bitterly and personally also shows that you haven't much idea about RfA and how it works. Which, of course, is fine, we all have to start somewhere, but please don't come here calling me "uncouth" and accusing me of saying things I have not said. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 07:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
273960 +++$+++ Onopearls +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273958 +++$+++ 273959 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.183676760E09 +++$+++ i apologize, i did take it personally, and didnt read your quote carefully, and for that i am sorry. i wont be nominating again unless i know what needs to be said, and perhaps i could get your help with that. =). again, i apologize.  +++$+++ ::i apologize, i did take it personally, and didnt read your quote carefully, and for that i am sorry. i wont be nominating again unless i know what needs to be said, and perhaps i could get your help with that. =). again, i apologize. [[User:Onopearls|Onopearls]] 16:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

11815 +++$+++ Skinny87 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-01 07:48:00 +++$+++ 1.235922480E09 +++$+++ Hello there. Please be careful when editing articles, especially those that are Good Articles or above. I put a lot of hard work into [[Operation Colossus]], and I don't see why you were deleting references to material that needed to be cited. Please discuss on the talkpage of an article before you do anything like that in the future.  +++$+++ Hello there. Please be careful when editing articles, especially those that are Good Articles or above. I put a lot of hard work into [[Operation Colossus]], and I don't see why you were deleting references to material that needed to be cited. Please discuss on the talkpage of an article before you do anything like that in the future. [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 07:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
11816 +++$+++ Skinny87 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11815 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.235942100E09 +++$+++ Yes, I know it isn't perfect, but the references did absolutely no harm, and I think they're helpful; I've certainly had no one complain about excessive referencing or deleting my references in any other article I've written or contributed to. Please be more considerate next time - posting on an article's talkpage is often the best solution.  +++$+++ ::Yes, I know it isn't perfect, but the references did absolutely no harm, and I think they're helpful; I've certainly had no one complain about excessive referencing or deleting my references in any other article I've written or contributed to. Please be more considerate next time - posting on an article's talkpage is often the best solution. [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 13:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

536106 +++$+++ Hunterd +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536106 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-02 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.154535540E09 +++$+++ Pardon my stupidity, good sir, but what exactly do you mean by ''transcribing''? '''Your one true god is  +++$+++ Pardon my stupidity, good sir, but what exactly do you mean by ''transcribing''? '''Your one true god is [[User:Hunterd|David P. A. Hunter, esq. III]] <sup> [[User talk:Hunterd/f06-07|Talk to me!]] </sup>''' 09:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
536107 +++$+++ Hunterd +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536106 +++$+++ 536106 +++$+++ 2006-08-02 09:24:00 +++$+++ 1.154535840E09 +++$+++ Do you mean for me to sort out the noms into reject or accepted pages after 7 days since the motto was proposed, as instructed at the top of the noms page? '''Your one true god is  +++$+++ *Do you mean for me to sort out the noms into reject or accepted pages after 7 days since the motto was proposed, as instructed at the top of the noms page? '''Your one true god is [[User:Hunterd|David P. A. Hunter, esq. III]] <sup> [[User talk:Hunterd/f06-07|Talk to me!]] </sup>''' 09:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

349555 +++$+++ Fyslee +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ 349555 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-02 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.220338980E09 +++$+++ Hi David. You may already be on top of this, but the new [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources (medicine-related articles)]] needs to be added to the main [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]] page. Maybe the whole LEAD can be used. Thanks for your efforts in this whole matter. -- <i><b><font color=\"004000\"> +++$+++ Hi David. You may already be on top of this, but the new [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources (medicine-related articles)]] needs to be added to the main [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]] page. Maybe the whole LEAD can be used. Thanks for your efforts in this whole matter. -- <i><b><font color="004000">[[User:Fyslee|Fyslee]]</font></b></i> / <b><font color="990099" size="1">[[User talk:Fyslee|talk]]</font></b> 00:03, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
349556 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ 349555 +++$+++ 349555 +++$+++ 2008-09-02 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.220341680E09 +++$+++ Thanks, no not sure I am on top of this one :-) I've been looking at [[WP:RS]] for a little time wondering how best to do that - opted for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AReliable_sources&diff=235710995&oldid=235245651 these 2 edits] - not sure well integrated vs your suggestion of using the lead. Feel free to rephrase :-)  +++$+++ :Thanks, no not sure I am on top of this one :-) I've been looking at [[WP:RS]] for a little time wondering how best to do that - opted for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AReliable_sources&diff=235710995&oldid=235245651 these 2 edits] - not sure well integrated vs your suggestion of using the lead. Feel free to rephrase :-) [[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 00:48, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

273964 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273964 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-07 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.183799100E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I have already got Steve onto this but I need your help as well. A certain individual that goes by the name of [[User: YourBiggestFan]] has decided to defame the Stan Zemanek article (see history for further details) and after VS and I have warned him it seems that he is using his IP to further vandalise (I believe that it is him). I will remove it and hand out another warning but could you please 1. Put him on your watchlist and 2. If you know of any tool to find out the location of IPs could you please enlighten me? Thanks  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I have already got Steve onto this but I need your help as well. A certain individual that goes by the name of [[User: YourBiggestFan]] has decided to defame the Stan Zemanek article (see history for further details) and after VS and I have warned him it seems that he is using his IP to further vandalise (I believe that it is him). I will remove it and hand out another warning but could you please 1. Put him on your watchlist and 2. If you know of any tool to find out the location of IPs could you please enlighten me? Thanks [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 02:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
273965 +++$+++ HB4026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273964 +++$+++ 273964 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.183823940E09 +++$+++ Thanks alot. Regarding my talk page, I am not sure how to fix it, I think that I need to get someone to help me on that one. Thanks  +++$+++ * Thanks alot. Regarding my talk page, I am not sure how to fix it, I think that I need to get someone to help me on that one. Thanks [[User:HB4026|Harrison-HB4026]] 08:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
273966 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273964 +++$+++ 273964 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.183883340E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah - I hope you are well too. (Great continuing work Harrison) - sorry I have been just flat out over the past 9 days in final tech, full dress rehearsal and then opening preview and opening night performances in a theatre production I am in, so just get to wiki intermittently - but will be back more now that the play is up and running.-- +++$+++ *Thanks Sarah - I hope you are well too. (Great continuing work Harrison) - sorry I have been just flat out over the past 9 days in final tech, full dress rehearsal and then opening preview and opening night performances in a theatre production I am in, so just get to wiki intermittently - but will be back more now that the play is up and running.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 01:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

11823 +++$+++ RabidDeity +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11823 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-17 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.253192940E09 +++$+++ I really don't mind either way, but if you're going to change one would you please change them all to keep [[Wikipedia:MOS#Internal_consistency|consistency]]?  Thanks! -- +++$+++ I really don't mind either way, but if you're going to change one would you please change them all to keep [[Wikipedia:MOS#Internal_consistency|consistency]]?  Thanks! --[[User:RabidDeity|RabidDeity]] ([[User talk:RabidDeity|talk]]) 06:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
11824 +++$+++ RabidDeity +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11823 +++$+++ 11823 +++$+++ 2009-09-18 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.253337900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the quick revision. Looks great! -- +++$+++ : Thanks for the quick revision. Looks great! --[[User:RabidDeity|RabidDeity]] ([[User talk:RabidDeity|talk]]) 22:25, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

273969 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-09 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.183976640E09 +++$+++ I didn't want to post this on that RfA, but, um, thanks for telling us. I didn't realize that person had made those edits. What a fool I feel, responding to a troll.  +++$+++ I didn't want to post this on that RfA, but, um, thanks for telling us. I didn't realize that person had made those edits. What a fool I feel, responding to a troll. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 03:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
273970 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273969 +++$+++ 273969 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.183977780E09 +++$+++ Thanks from me also; I actually had noticed those things when I went to check out who was opposing my nominee from behind a redlink, but decided that I had already written more than enough on that RfA page. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks from me also; I actually had noticed those things when I went to check out who was opposing my nominee from behind a redlink, but decided that I had already written more than enough on that RfA page. Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 03:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
273971 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273969 +++$+++ 273969 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.184033760E09 +++$+++ I don't feel bad; I just wished I paid more attention to his contributions. I didn't want to come across as uncivil on that RfA when responding. I couldn't find an AN\/I report, but I did find [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Archive90#User_wanting_to_be_blocked.3F this], if that's any use. Thanks again.  +++$+++ *I don't feel bad; I just wished I paid more attention to his contributions. I didn't want to come across as uncivil on that RfA when responding. I couldn't find an AN/I report, but I did find [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive90#User_wanting_to_be_blocked.3F this], if that's any use. Thanks again. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

11830 +++$+++ Nev1 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11830 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-26 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.293419100E09 +++$+++ Mdashes shouldn't be spaced per [[MOS:DASH]], as was your edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lindow_Man&action=historysubmit&diff=404329810&oldid=404329348 here]. Please also take a look at [[WP:NBSP]], and per [[WP:PERCENT]] there should not be a space between numbers and % symbols as you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lindow_Man&diff=prev&oldid=404329348 here]. In light of that, you may want to take another look at your edits to the [[Ming Dynasty]] article where you have introduced spaced mdashes.  +++$+++ Mdashes shouldn't be spaced per [[MOS:DASH]], as was your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lindow_Man&action=historysubmit&diff=404329810&oldid=404329348 here]. Please also take a look at [[WP:NBSP]], and per [[WP:PERCENT]] there should not be a space between numbers and % symbols as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lindow_Man&diff=prev&oldid=404329348 here]. In light of that, you may want to take another look at your edits to the [[Ming Dynasty]] article where you have introduced spaced mdashes. [[User:Nev1|Nev1]] ([[User talk:Nev1|talk]]) 19:05, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
11831 +++$+++ Nev1 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11830 +++$+++ 11830 +++$+++ 2010-12-26 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.293420240E09 +++$+++ Your edits to the Lindow Man articles, such as [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lindow_Man&diff=prev&oldid=404333623 this], are going against the [[WP:MOS|manual of style]] and are becoming disruptive. Please stop.  +++$+++ :Your edits to the Lindow Man articles, such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lindow_Man&diff=prev&oldid=404333623 this], are going against the [[WP:MOS|manual of style]] and are becoming disruptive. Please stop. [[User:Nev1|Nev1]] ([[User talk:Nev1|talk]]) 19:24, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
11832 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11830 +++$+++ 11831 +++$+++ 2010-12-26 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.293420420E09 +++$+++ On the contrary, the excessive use of non-break spaces is wrong.   +++$+++ :: On the contrary, the excessive use of non-break spaces is wrong.  [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] ([[User talk:Leandrod#top|talk]]) 19:27, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

273975 +++$+++ Stillstudying +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273975 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-12 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.184273160E09 +++$+++ I was struck by something you wrote about inflated numbers as a guidepost for RfA nominations, and wanted to say YES!  Recently on a nomination I made, the sole neutral vote, so far, has been for not obtaining a specific number of edits.  Yet the user I nominated is a prolific article writer - 5 brand new really good articles the last month alone! - and it struck me, shouldn't quality and article writing count more than tiny one word edits just to run up numbers?   I was therefore really struck by your comment on this matter, which I thought said the same thing, only better... +++$+++ I was struck by something you wrote about inflated numbers as a guidepost for RfA nominations, and wanted to say YES!  Recently on a nomination I made, the sole neutral vote, so far, has been for not obtaining a specific number of edits.  Yet the user I nominated is a prolific article writer - 5 brand new really good articles the last month alone! - and it struck me, shouldn't quality and article writing count more than tiny one word edits just to run up numbers?   I was therefore really struck by your comment on this matter, which I thought said the same thing, only better...[[User:Stillstudying|Stillstudying]] 13:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
273976 +++$+++ Stillstudying +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273975 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.184276460E09 +++$+++ I answered you on my talk page, but wanted to post this prominantly on your page: keep fighting for a better review system on RfA's than what we have!  I am not sure what we should substitute, but we have to find a better way than mere totals without any examination of quality, which is your point.  YOU ARE 100% CORRECT.  +++$+++ :::I answered you on my talk page, but wanted to post this prominantly on your page: keep fighting for a better review system on RfA's than what we have!  I am not sure what we should substitute, but we have to find a better way than mere totals without any examination of quality, which is your point.  YOU ARE 100% CORRECT. [[User:Stillstudying|Stillstudying]] 14:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

11833 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-28 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.293593940E09 +++$+++ Hi Leandrod, just to let you know that citation templates shouldn't be added to articles that already use another method of writing references, as you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Brown_Dog_affair&action=historysubmit&diff=402172585&oldid=400347133 here]. See [[WP:CITECONSENSUS]]. Many thanks, <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ Hi Leandrod, just to let you know that citation templates shouldn't be added to articles that already use another method of writing references, as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brown_Dog_affair&action=historysubmit&diff=402172585&oldid=400347133 here]. See [[WP:CITECONSENSUS]]. Many thanks, <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|contribs]]</font></sup></small> 19:39, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
11834 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11833 +++$+++ 11833 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.295522820E09 +++$+++ More specifically, thin non-breaking spaces, and that is what I edited into there.  +++$+++ :More specifically, thin non-breaking spaces, and that is what I edited into there. [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] ([[User talk:Leandrod#top|talk]]) 03:27, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

614536 +++$+++ BaseballBaby +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614536 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-17 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.155834240E09 +++$+++ Hi, Daniel - thanks very much for reverting the vandalism to my user page. It's the price of doing CVU and AfDs, I guess. Thanks again -  +++$+++ Hi, Daniel - thanks very much for reverting the vandalism to my user page. It's the price of doing CVU and AfDs, I guess. Thanks again - [[User:BaseballBaby|<font color="darkblue">'''Baseball,Baby!'''</font>]] [[User talk:BaseballBaby|<font color="red"><sup>''balls''</sup></font>]]<font color="darkblue"><sup>•</sup></font>[[Special:Contributions/BaseballBaby|<font color="red"><sup>''strikes''</sup></font>]] 10:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
614537 +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614536 +++$+++ 614536 +++$+++ 2006-08-17 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.155860280E09 +++$+++ Vandals beware, Daniel is here! -- +++$+++ :Vandals beware, Daniel is here! --[[User:Daniel Olsen|Daniel Olsen]] 17:18, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

307807 +++$+++ Mais oui! +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-29 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.154206980E09 +++$+++ No way is \"annnexation\" an NPOV word. A foreign country - Norway - invades and occupies the islands, and then when they are returned to Scotland they miraculously become \"annexed\". No way. That is just shit-stirring for the sake of it, and yes, before you ask, I certainly do think that EB are a bunch of shit-stirrers: they have an editorial angle just like every other publication. Wikipedia should stick to facts and drop the heavily POV terminology. What are the actual terms of the dowry? That would be a far better place to start than some off-the-cuff, facile term like \"annexation\". -- +++$+++ No way is "annnexation" an NPOV word. A foreign country - Norway - invades and occupies the islands, and then when they are returned to Scotland they miraculously become "annexed". No way. That is just shit-stirring for the sake of it, and yes, before you ask, I certainly do think that EB are a bunch of shit-stirrers: they have an editorial angle just like every other publication. Wikipedia should stick to facts and drop the heavily POV terminology. What are the actual terms of the dowry? That would be a far better place to start than some off-the-cuff, facile term like "annexation". --[[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] 14:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
307808 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307807 +++$+++ 307807 +++$+++ 2006-07-29 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.154224380E09 +++$+++ Hi Mais, glad you didn't mean to imply a personal attack on me. Your intention not to stand idly by is noted, and I trust that you're exploring dispute resolution procedures to resolve any attacks or sockpuppetry, rather than bringing it up on article talk pages which is unacceptable. However, while \"annnexation\" may not be an NPOV word, it's clearly an Orcadian POV which should be shown in the article. If there are reliable sources showing an alternative POV these should be brought up. However, it was clear that the year shown was of the annexation of the earldom rather than the isles, and hope that you're content with this being clarified in the article. .. +++$+++ :Hi Mais, glad you didn't mean to imply a personal attack on me. Your intention not to stand idly by is noted, and I trust that you're exploring dispute resolution procedures to resolve any attacks or sockpuppetry, rather than bringing it up on article talk pages which is unacceptable. However, while "annnexation" may not be an NPOV word, it's clearly an Orcadian POV which should be shown in the article. If there are reliable sources showing an alternative POV these should be brought up. However, it was clear that the year shown was of the annexation of the earldom rather than the isles, and hope that you're content with this being clarified in the article. ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
307809 +++$+++ Mais oui! +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307807 +++$+++ 307808 +++$+++ 2006-07-29 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.154227020E09 +++$+++ Yes, you're wording of ''earldom'' is much, much better (I have been looking for someone to come along with a compromise all along - cos compromise is a rare aspect of my own personality). I just haven't the time for this at the moment, but obviously if there are two opposing POVs then Wikipedia should make an honest effort at presenting ''both'' sides. The problem is that, as it currently stands, the \"annexation\" POV is being presented as [[fact]], and not as one interpretation only. As regards sockpuppetry: if you give him enough rope he will hang himself. -- +++$+++ ::Yes, you're wording of ''earldom'' is much, much better (I have been looking for someone to come along with a compromise all along - cos compromise is a rare aspect of my own personality). I just haven't the time for this at the moment, but obviously if there are two opposing POVs then Wikipedia should make an honest effort at presenting ''both'' sides. The problem is that, as it currently stands, the "annexation" POV is being presented as [[fact]], and not as one interpretation only. As regards sockpuppetry: if you give him enough rope he will hang himself. --[[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] 19:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
307810 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307807 +++$+++ 307807 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.154675220E09 +++$+++ Thanks, fully agree. The difficulty I have is nailing down this peculiar idea that there's a \"Law\" in \"information entropy\" demanding increasing disorder, as the creationists claim when trying to claim that complexity needs <s>divine<\/s> supernatural intervention. The ID page has suffered a lot from ideological attacks in the past, so even benign changes are met with suspicion and have to be tactfully argued for. However the rather combative line taken was very much given credibility when the Kitzmiller verdict came out. Take care, .. +++$+++ :Thanks, fully agree. The difficulty I have is nailing down this peculiar idea that there's a "Law" in "information entropy" demanding increasing disorder, as the creationists claim when trying to claim that complexity needs <s>divine</s> supernatural intervention. The ID page has suffered a lot from ideological attacks in the past, so even benign changes are met with suspicion and have to be tactfully argued for. However the rather combative line taken was very much given credibility when the Kitzmiller verdict came out. Take care, ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 00:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

11839 +++$+++ UKWikiGuy +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-23 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.295830140E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|do not attack]] other editors, as you did here: [[:User:UKWikiGuy]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-npa3 -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|do not attack]] other editors, as you did here: [[:User:UKWikiGuy]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> [[User:UKWikiGuy|UKWikiGuy]] ([[User talk:UKWikiGuy|talk]]) 16:49, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
11840 +++$+++ UKWikiGuy +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11839 +++$+++ 11839 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.295927580E09 +++$+++ You did not ask for clarification. And turning the argument around doesn't make any sense. You can not assume good faith for a subject matter. And why do you keep introducing foreign characters and broken English into the English wikipedia?  +++$+++ :You did not ask for clarification. And turning the argument around doesn't make any sense. You can not assume good faith for a subject matter. And why do you keep introducing foreign characters and broken English into the English wikipedia? [[User:UKWikiGuy|UKWikiGuy]] ([[User talk:UKWikiGuy|talk]]) 19:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
11841 +++$+++ UKWikiGuy +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11839 +++$+++ 11840 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.295985000E09 +++$+++ And you just posted yet another personal attack on my talk page, with even more foreign characters. Forgive me if I am wrong but {\xfe, \xf0, \xf0, \xdf} are not English characters  +++$+++ ::And you just posted yet another personal attack on my talk page, with even more foreign characters. Forgive me if I am wrong but {þ, ð, ð, ß} are not English characters [[User:UKWikiGuy|UKWikiGuy]] ([[User talk:UKWikiGuy|talk]]) 11:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
11842 +++$+++ UKWikiGuy +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11839 +++$+++ 11841 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.296009840E09 +++$+++ You are clearly not familiar with the English language. This is not an attack, this is an observation. Feel free to familiarise yourself with the [[Roman alphabet]], the only one used for written English. I know what you are doing, you are using foreign letters to phonetically spell English words, but this is wrong and makes what you are saying incorrect English  +++$+++ :::You are clearly not familiar with the English language. This is not an attack, this is an observation. Feel free to familiarise yourself with the [[Roman alphabet]], the only one used for written English. I know what you are doing, you are using foreign letters to phonetically spell English words, but this is wrong and makes what you are saying incorrect English [[User:UKWikiGuy|UKWikiGuy]] ([[User talk:UKWikiGuy|talk]]) 18:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

536128 +++$+++ Computerjoe +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536128 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-23 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.156393740E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but I have to decline. I do not yet feel that I have addressed concerns in my last RfA.  +++$+++ Thanks, but I have to decline. I do not yet feel that I have addressed concerns in my last RfA. [[User:Computerjoe|Computerjoe]][[User talk:Computerjoe|<span style="color:red">'s talk</span>]] 21:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
536129 +++$+++ Lordhighdumbass +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536128 +++$+++ 536128 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.156400940E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Geo.plrd 2]] Best regards,  +++$+++ :See [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Geo.plrd 2]] Best regards, [[User:Lordhighdumbass|Lordhighdumbass]] 23:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

11843 +++$+++ Ashanda +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11843 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-29 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.296353580E09 +++$+++ Hello! I thank you for your hard work fixing the typography in articles. I have run into a problem though. Where you have replaced non-breaking spaces ( & n b s p ; ) such as here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Vactrain&diff=prev&oldid=410767446 diff], the character you're using to replace it shows up as a little box in my browser. Of course that means my browser doesn't recognize the character. Could you please use a more generally recognized non-breaking space character since a lot of people around the world probably have the same problem as I do. Thanks for your time! -- +++$+++ Hello! I thank you for your hard work fixing the typography in articles. I have run into a problem though. Where you have replaced non-breaking spaces ( & n b s p ; ) such as here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vactrain&diff=prev&oldid=410767446 diff], the character you're using to replace it shows up as a little box in my browser. Of course that means my browser doesn't recognize the character. Could you please use a more generally recognized non-breaking space character since a lot of people around the world probably have the same problem as I do. Thanks for your time! --[[User:Ashanda|Ashanda]] ([[User talk:Ashanda|talk]]) 18:13, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11844 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11843 +++$+++ 11843 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.296354180E09 +++$+++ \u2014  +++$+++ :— [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] ([[User talk:Leandrod|talk]]) 18:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

11846 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-29 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.296363960E09 +++$+++ To add to what the others have said above: if you wish to replace non-breaking space characters by something with the same width as a normal space, a better way do it is with the {{tl|nowrap}} template. Doing it that way avoids using nonstandard characters that do not work as well in many browsers. \u2014 +++$+++ To add to what the others have said above: if you wish to replace non-breaking space characters by something with the same width as a normal space, a better way do it is with the {{tl|nowrap}} template. Doing it that way avoids using nonstandard characters that do not work as well in many browsers. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 21:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
11847 +++$+++ DMacks +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11846 +++$+++ 11846 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.297077480E09 +++$+++ Again, ''please stop doing this''. nbsp is the documented standard to use in the [[WP:MOS]].  +++$+++ :Again, ''please stop doing this''. nbsp is the documented standard to use in the [[WP:MOS]]. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 03:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

273991 +++$+++ Raymond arritt +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-13 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.187008200E09 +++$+++ I was going through AN3 and took a close look at this case. You made the block (or reported your block) before I was done, but by my count [[User:Prester John]] also breached 3RR. Since you're the one who handled this case I'll leave it to you to make the call. I find it distressingly common for 3RR reports to be filed by those who have themselves violated the letter or spirit of 3RR.  +++$+++ I was going through AN3 and took a close look at this case. You made the block (or reported your block) before I was done, but by my count [[User:Prester John]] also breached 3RR. Since you're the one who handled this case I'll leave it to you to make the call. I find it distressingly common for 3RR reports to be filed by those who have themselves violated the letter or spirit of 3RR. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] 05:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
273992 +++$+++ Sandstein +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273991 +++$+++ 273991 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.187028300E09 +++$+++ Hello. Could you comment on my comment on the unblock request at [[User talk:Lester2]]? Thanks,  +++$+++ :Hello. Could you comment on my comment on the unblock request at [[User talk:Lester2]]? Thanks, [[User:Sandstein|Sandstein]] 11:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

11848 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11848 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-26 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.298786640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 22:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
11849 +++$+++ Ashanda +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11848 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-26 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.298787720E09 +++$+++ Quite frankly, if you persist with these habits of using non-standard characters despite weeks of requests from other editors for you to stop, I would consider the behavior to be [[WP:disruptive|disruptive]] and would bring it up at [[WP:ANI]]. I would rather not, so please stop now.  +++$+++ :::Quite frankly, if you persist with these habits of using non-standard characters despite weeks of requests from other editors for you to stop, I would consider the behavior to be [[WP:disruptive|disruptive]] and would bring it up at [[WP:ANI]]. I would rather not, so please stop now. [[User:Ashanda|Ashanda]] ([[User talk:Ashanda|talk]]) 22:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

273994 +++$+++ Chaser +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-14 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.187091060E09 +++$+++ What's your two cents on my block of [[User:Matt57]]? I don't want you to review the request (unless it's to unblock him), since you were reverting things, but I wouldn't mind a sanity check.-- +++$+++ What's your two cents on my block of [[User:Matt57]]? I don't want you to review the request (unless it's to unblock him), since you were reverting things, but I wouldn't mind a sanity check.--[[User:Chaser|Chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|T]] 04:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
273995 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273994 +++$+++ 273994 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.187091360E09 +++$+++ I endorse your block as a preventative block. I think it is quite possible he is telling the truth, however, personally, I wouldn't like to unblock without a checkuser or a general consensus. The edit summaries the first sock was using just 'sounded' like Matt. Though it is possible that was deliberate if it was someone trying to get in in trouble. A checkuser has been filed, I'd wait until that comes back. ''' +++$+++ :I endorse your block as a preventative block. I think it is quite possible he is telling the truth, however, personally, I wouldn't like to unblock without a checkuser or a general consensus. The edit summaries the first sock was using just 'sounded' like Matt. Though it is possible that was deliberate if it was someone trying to get in in trouble. A checkuser has been filed, I'd wait until that comes back. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 04:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
273996 +++$+++ Chaser +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273994 +++$+++ 273995 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.187091480E09 +++$+++ The sock attack is suggestive of HisExcellency. How about this, I unblock on the condition he not edit the articles under dispute until the checkuser comes back?-- +++$+++ ::The sock attack is suggestive of HisExcellency. How about this, I unblock on the condition he not edit the articles under dispute until the checkuser comes back?--[[User:Chaser|Chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|T]] 04:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
273997 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273994 +++$+++ 273996 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.187091840E09 +++$+++ Yep, you could do that if you want to but before unblocking, you might want to get him to retract his (absurd) accusations against Slim, Shell, Michael and Elonka. ''' +++$+++ :::Yep, you could do that if you want to but before unblocking, you might want to get him to retract his (absurd) accusations against Slim, Shell, Michael and Elonka. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 04:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
273998 +++$+++ Chaser +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 273994 +++$+++ 273997 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.187092920E09 +++$+++ All done.-- +++$+++ ::::All done.--[[User:Chaser|Chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|T]] 05:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

11851 +++$+++  +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-14 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.297712100E09 +++$+++ \u2014 Leandro GFC Dutra (talk) 11:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ — Leandro GFC Dutra (talk) 11:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
11852 +++$+++ Favonian +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11851 +++$+++ 11851 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.297712340E09 +++$+++ I moved your question from the talk page of a deleted article, which will itself be deleted. The numerous keep !votes were obvious meatpuppets and therefore didn't count for much in the assessment done by the closing admin.  If you have an issue with this decision, you should state it at [[Wikipedia:DRV#Nemerle]].   +++$+++ :I moved your question from the talk page of a deleted article, which will itself be deleted. The numerous keep !votes were obvious meatpuppets and therefore didn't count for much in the assessment done by the closing admin.  If you have an issue with this decision, you should state it at [[Wikipedia:DRV#Nemerle]].  [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 11:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

11857 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-26 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.303805340E09 +++$+++ Could you please fix it up? thanks -- +++$+++ Could you please fix it up? thanks --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 01:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
11858 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11857 +++$+++ 11857 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.303805820E09 +++$+++ PS - also occurring on [[Transition to the New Order]]. cheers -- +++$+++ :PS - also occurring on [[Transition to the New Order]]. cheers --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 01:17, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
11859 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11857 +++$+++ 11858 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.303806000E09 +++$+++ Your most recent edit: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Transition_to_the_New_Order&curid=2887667&diff=425931391&oldid=425930223 Huh?] Could you please explain? thanks -- +++$+++ ::Your most recent edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transition_to_the_New_Order&curid=2887667&diff=425931391&oldid=425930223 Huh?] Could you please explain? thanks --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 01:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
11860 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11857 +++$+++ 11859 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.303806420E09 +++$+++ And, in [[Indonesia]] - a feature article. Is it intentional that the page numbers appear in the prose? It looks very ugly IMO. If it is intentional, could you please direct me to the appropriate guideline (the MOS?). thanks -- +++$+++ :::And, in [[Indonesia]] - a feature article. Is it intentional that the page numbers appear in the prose? It looks very ugly IMO. If it is intentional, could you please direct me to the appropriate guideline (the MOS?). thanks --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 01:27, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
11861 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11857 +++$+++ 11860 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.303806600E09 +++$+++ With the rp template.  So one can search for, and fix, the miryad broken references in the Indonesia articles.  Clear enough?\u2014  +++$+++ ::::With the rp template.  So one can search for, and fix, the miryad broken references in the Indonesia articles.  Clear enough?— [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] ([[User talk:Leandrod|talk]]) 01:30, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
11862 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11857 +++$+++ 11861 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.303806900E09 +++$+++ No, it's not clear. Could you please clarify the nature of the broken references problem that you see, and how messing around with citation formats fixes it - ie, why are the page numbers in the prose? Can you show me other examples? Or where there is consensus\/guideline\/etc to do this? I request that you cease this until it is understood and agreed. cheers -- +++$+++ :::::No, it's not clear. Could you please clarify the nature of the broken references problem that you see, and how messing around with citation formats fixes it - ie, why are the page numbers in the prose? Can you show me other examples? Or where there is consensus/guideline/etc to do this? I request that you cease this until it is understood and agreed. cheers --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 01:35, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
11863 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11857 +++$+++ 11862 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.303807380E09 +++$+++ Since it appears you are insistent on ignoring reasonable requests for clarification and for consensus (not helped by your unclear edit summaries), I've reverted your latest unusual edits (one of which includes another breaking of the citation that I had already fixed). Please respond with clarity. thanks -- +++$+++ ::::::Since it appears you are insistent on ignoring reasonable requests for clarification and for consensus (not helped by your unclear edit summaries), I've reverted your latest unusual edits (one of which includes another breaking of the citation that I had already fixed). Please respond with clarity. thanks --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 01:43, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
11864 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11857 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.303807620E09 +++$+++ I ''have'' researched and could find no mention of the rp template. It would have been nice if you provided an explanation or a link regarding its usage. -- +++$+++ ::::::::I ''have'' researched and could find no mention of the rp template. It would have been nice if you provided an explanation or a link regarding its usage. --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 01:47, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

45667 +++$+++ Pax85 +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45667 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-11 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.302519900E09 +++$+++ If you like, I can withdraw my name from the copy-edit so you can find someone who will be able to complete it quicker, or I can continue working on it throughout the week. Let me know what you think. I must say though that despite the need for a copy-edit, it looks like a very informative article! - +++$+++ If you like, I can withdraw my name from the copy-edit so you can find someone who will be able to complete it quicker, or I can continue working on it throughout the week. Let me know what you think. I must say though that despite the need for a copy-edit, it looks like a very informative article! -[[User:Pax85|Pax85]] ([[User talk:Pax85|talk]]) 04:05, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
45668 +++$+++ Joyson Noel  +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45667 +++$+++ 45667 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.302536580E09 +++$+++ Not a problem, dude! I understand. Your exams are way more important. You can go ahead and withdraw your name. I'm sure that someone else will take up the task. Thanks again, and best of luck! :-)  +++$+++ : Not a problem, dude! I understand. Your exams are way more important. You can go ahead and withdraw your name. I'm sure that someone else will take up the task. Thanks again, and best of luck! :-) [[User:Joyson Noel |<big><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000">Joyson Noel</FONT></big>]][[User talk:Joyson Noel |<small><sup><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000"> Holla at me!</FONT></sup></small>]] 08:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

274004 +++$+++ Vagr4nt +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.187529840E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I notice you locked [[Perverted Justice]]. I'm guessing this is in relation to the broken links to the perverted-justice.com website (where all the links now redirect to rant against wikipedia). How should we proceed with this? Should I make an entry on [[WP:ANI]]?  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I notice you locked [[Perverted Justice]]. I'm guessing this is in relation to the broken links to the perverted-justice.com website (where all the links now redirect to rant against wikipedia). How should we proceed with this? Should I make an entry on [[WP:ANI]]? [[User:Vagr4nt|Vagr4nt]] 06:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
274005 +++$+++ Vagr4nt +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274004 +++$+++ 274004 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.187530560E09 +++$+++ Okay, I see that you just decided to remove the links. There may be one you missed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Perverted-Justice#_ref-12].  +++$+++ : Okay, I see that you just decided to remove the links. There may be one you missed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perverted-Justice#_ref-12]. [[User:Vagr4nt|Vagr4nt]] 06:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

463034 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 463034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-12 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.266022980E09 +++$+++ As the tag was removed originally by the article's creator, which as you know they are not supposed to do, I think you should restore it, particularly since the reason your removed it turned out to be an error.  +++$+++ As the tag was removed originally by the article's creator, which as you know they are not supposed to do, I think you should restore it, particularly since the reason your removed it turned out to be an error. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 17:03, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
463035 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 463034 +++$+++ 463034 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.266023700E09 +++$+++ Ok, ignore that, I've seen the AfD. I'm pretty sure that we have an account here using an IP also to edit. It may be just cluelessness, not realising they are logged out, or deliberate, I don't know.  +++$+++ :Ok, ignore that, I've seen the AfD. I'm pretty sure that we have an account here using an IP also to edit. It may be just cluelessness, not realising they are logged out, or deliberate, I don't know. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 17:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
463036 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 463034 +++$+++ 463035 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.266024120E09 +++$+++ You may well be correct about the creator also editing as an IP, but since he doesn't seem to be pretending to be two people, or otherwise editing disruptively (except for the removal of the speedy tag, which I will [[AP:AGF]] to be ignorance) there is no problem that i can see. I chose to edit solely as an IP for over a year, and still sometimes find myself logged out unexpectedly.  +++$+++ ::You may well be correct about the creator also editing as an IP, but since he doesn't seem to be pretending to be two people, or otherwise editing disruptively (except for the removal of the speedy tag, which I will [[AP:AGF]] to be ignorance) there is no problem that i can see. I chose to edit solely as an IP for over a year, and still sometimes find myself logged out unexpectedly. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 17:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

536152 +++$+++ Hunterd +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-22 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.158931740E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Wikipedia:Motto_of_the_day\/Nominations#In_Soviet_Russia.2C_Wikipedia_edits_you.21|hither]], and cast thine vote. You have the deciding vote. Also, please look at the Overseer desk (I've made changes there, and added Childzy to the ''past-overseers'' list). Thanks.  +++$+++ Please see [[Wikipedia:Motto_of_the_day/Nominations#In_Soviet_Russia.2C_Wikipedia_edits_you.21|hither]], and cast thine vote. You have the deciding vote. Also, please look at the Overseer desk (I've made changes there, and added Childzy to the ''past-overseers'' list). Thanks. [[User:Hunterd|David P. A. Hunter, esq. III]] <sup> [[User talk:Hunterd|The rest]] </sup> <sub> [[Special:Contributions/Hunterd|is silence!]]</sub> 06:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
536153 +++$+++  +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536152 +++$+++ 536152 +++$+++ 2006-09-25 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.159168680E09 +++$+++ Just about to usurp your position until you got back from what I assumed was a [[Wp:Break|WikiBreak]]. Upon loading this here page I see at the top: \"{{unblock|What the fuck!!! My IP is blocked}.},\" so I shan't usurp it, unless you state otherwise... note that you'll need to remove the full stop (\".\") at the end of the template otherwise admins won't see it... And... try to use decent language too. They're admins. They have the power! Absolute power corrupts absolutely! Have fun with your negotiations. :-)  +++$+++ *Just about to usurp your position until you got back from what I assumed was a [[Wp:Break|WikiBreak]]. Upon loading this here page I see at the top: "{{unblock|What the fuck!!! My IP is blocked}.}," so I shan't usurp it, unless you state otherwise... note that you'll need to remove the full stop (".") at the end of the template otherwise admins won't see it... And... try to use decent language too. They're admins. They have the power! Absolute power corrupts absolutely! Have fun with your negotiations. :-) [[User:Hunterd|David P. A. Hunter, Esq. III]] <sup> [[User talk:Hunterd|The rest]] </sup> <sub> [[Special:Contributions/Hunterd|is silence!]]</sub> Save [http://www.savestargatesg1.com Stargate] [[Stargate SG-1|SG-1]]! 00:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
536154 +++$+++  +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536152 +++$+++ 536153 +++$+++ 2006-09-25 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.159168680E09 +++$+++ Changed my mind. Usurping your position until you return. Just keeping the seat warm, and the desk cover'd in papers.  +++$+++ **Changed my mind. Usurping your position until you return. Just keeping the seat warm, and the desk cover'd in papers. [[User:Hunterd|David P. A. Hunter, Esq. III]] <sup> [[User talk:Hunterd|The rest]] </sup> <sub> [[Special:Contributions/Hunterd|is silence!]]</sub> Save [http://www.savestargatesg1.com Stargate] [[Stargate SG-1|SG-1]]! 00:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

274009 +++$+++ 84.45.219.185 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274009 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-20 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.187629980E09 +++$+++ <FONT face=\"Trebuchet MS\" size=\"4\"><B>Well, you gotta have one... for your good work!<\/b><\/font> -- +++$+++ <FONT face="Trebuchet MS" size="4"><B>Well, you gotta have one... for your good work!</b></font> --[[User:84.45.219.185|84.45.219.185]] 10:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
274010 +++$+++ 84.45.219.185 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274009 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 10:18:00 +++$+++ 1.187630280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comment. There is another user here on this IP, but he's off today, so it's just me. Don't know if I'll get an account yet... but you sure do good work! -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for your comment. There is another user here on this IP, but he's off today, so it's just me. Don't know if I'll get an account yet... but you sure do good work! --[[User:84.45.219.185|84.45.219.185]] 10:18, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

11867 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-17 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.305677760E09 +++$+++ Re: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ludwig_von_Westphalen&diff=429583288&oldid=429582631]. Please stop removing references. All sentences should be cited, and if they are based on multiple sources, than they will have multiple refs attached. I am sure your edit was in good faith, but it was, unfortunately, not helpful. --<sub style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Re: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ludwig_von_Westphalen&diff=429583288&oldid=429582631]. Please stop removing references. All sentences should be cited, and if they are based on multiple sources, than they will have multiple refs attached. I am sure your edit was in good faith, but it was, unfortunately, not helpful. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</sub> 17:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
11868 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11867 +++$+++ 11867 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.305708240E09 +++$+++ Update: I have just noticed you did a similar edit at another article ([[Armoured trains of Poland]]). While I realize this occurred before my request above, as it does indicate a recurring pattern, I have to ask you, in the strongest possible way, to stop damaging the work of other editors that way. No references are redundant. Thank you, --<sub style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Update: I have just noticed you did a similar edit at another article ([[Armoured trains of Poland]]). While I realize this occurred before my request above, as it does indicate a recurring pattern, I have to ask you, in the strongest possible way, to stop damaging the work of other editors that way. No references are redundant. Thank you, --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</sub> 01:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

274012 +++$+++ GlassCobra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274012 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-20 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.187661840E09 +++$+++ Hey, seems like [[User:A12n|A12n]] has re-made this page. I'm not sure if this was done with your knowledge or not, but I thought I'd let you know.  +++$+++ Hey, seems like [[User:A12n|A12n]] has re-made this page. I'm not sure if this was done with your knowledge or not, but I thought I'd let you know. [[User:GlassCobra|GlassCobra]] 19:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
274013 +++$+++ A12n +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274012 +++$+++ 274012 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.187663880E09 +++$+++ Hi, [[User:GlassCobra|GlassCobra]] is correct. I restored the article with what I understand to be the proper ref format. I'm also sorry for the misunderstanding but appreciate your assistance. (Further comments on [[User_talk:A12n#.7B.7B.7Bheader-text.7C.5B.5B:Open_Society_Initiative_for_Southern_Africa.5D.5D.7D.7D.7D|my user talk page]]). All the best. -- +++$+++ :Hi, [[User:GlassCobra|GlassCobra]] is correct. I restored the article with what I understand to be the proper ref format. I'm also sorry for the misunderstanding but appreciate your assistance. (Further comments on [[User_talk:A12n#.7B.7B.7Bheader-text.7C.5B.5B:Open_Society_Initiative_for_Southern_Africa.5D.5D.7D.7D.7D|my user talk page]]). All the best. --[[User:A12n|A12n]] 19:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
274014 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274012 +++$+++ 274012 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.187683080E09 +++$+++ Thanks GlassCobra. I moved the article into the editor's userspace so s\/he could work on it. I don't have any problems with them reposting it now that they have fixed the copyright\/quote referencing issue. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Thanks GlassCobra. I moved the article into the editor's userspace so s/he could work on it. I don't have any problems with them reposting it now that they have fixed the copyright/quote referencing issue. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 00:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

11869 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11869 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-18 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.305708480E09 +++$+++ At the same time, I would like to thank you for many other helpful edits you do, such as punctuation, grammar, of citation template introduction. But please, stop removing references. Even if they appear redundant now, we can never now when somebody will break the para, insert something into it, move sentences around or copy some to another article. --<sub style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ At the same time, I would like to thank you for many other helpful edits you do, such as punctuation, grammar, of citation template introduction. But please, stop removing references. Even if they appear redundant now, we can never now when somebody will break the para, insert something into it, move sentences around or copy some to another article. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</sub> 01:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
11870 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11869 +++$+++ 11869 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.305709440E09 +++$+++ I have to agree with Piotrus here. I\u2019ve seen on a number of occasions people throw in cite tags or even dispute and remove info from mid-paragraph where the citation is a few sentences later. It gets worse when people start moving info around (to which Piotrus alludes). -- +++$+++ :I have to agree with Piotrus here. I’ve seen on a number of occasions people throw in cite tags or even dispute and remove info from mid-paragraph where the citation is a few sentences later. It gets worse when people start moving info around (to which Piotrus alludes). --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 02:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
11871 +++$+++ Ironholds +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11869 +++$+++ 11869 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.306470120E09 +++$+++ Same thing [[Battle of Rowton Heath|here]]. Using page numbers is a perfectly acceptable citation style.  +++$+++ *Same thing [[Battle of Rowton Heath|here]]. Using page numbers is a perfectly acceptable citation style. [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 21:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

274015 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-20 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.187668800E09 +++$+++ Please review [[WP:SOCK]] - Sock puppets are not prohibited. What is prohibited is the abuse of socks to rig votes or bypass blocks.  (this in reference to user:123.2.168.215) --- +++$+++ Please review [[WP:SOCK]] - Sock puppets are not prohibited. What is prohibited is the abuse of socks to rig votes or bypass blocks.  (this in reference to user:123.2.168.215) ---[[User:J.smith|J.S]]  <small>([[User_talk:J.smith|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/J.smith|C]]/[[WP:WRE|WRE]])</small> 21:00, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
274016 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274015 +++$+++ 274015 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.187681940E09 +++$+++ Thanks. However, I did not block on the basis of sockpupppets as such. I blocked on the basis of [[WP:SOCK#Circumventing_policy|Circumventing policy]], \"Users who are banned or blocked from editing may not use sock puppets to circumvent this.\" I was acting on the belief that  +++$+++ :Thanks. However, I did not block on the basis of sockpupppets as such. I blocked on the basis of [[WP:SOCK#Circumventing_policy|Circumventing policy]], "Users who are banned or blocked from editing may not use sock puppets to circumvent this." I was acting on the belief that [[User:Zordrac]] (Blissyu2 / Internodeuser) is banned, as noted on his talk page and the various block logs, however, I concur with the IP that his status is unclear and confusing and I have already asked for clarification from people involved. Thanks for your comment, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 00:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
274017 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274015 +++$+++ 274016 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.187689380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for responding. --- +++$+++ ::Thanks for responding. ---[[User:J.smith|J.S]]  <small>([[User_talk:J.smith|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/J.smith|C]]/[[WP:WRE|WRE]])</small> 02:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
274018 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274015 +++$+++ 274017 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.187730180E09 +++$+++ No problems and thanks for coming straight to me with your concern. It prompted me to go back and re-read my comments and I realised that a comment near the end could easily be misinterpreted as an objection to the use of multiple accounts, rather than, as I intended,  an objection to the ban evasion. So thank you for raising this with me. ''' +++$+++ :::No problems and thanks for coming straight to me with your concern. It prompted me to go back and re-read my comments and I realised that a comment near the end could easily be misinterpreted as an objection to the use of multiple accounts, rather than, as I intended,  an objection to the ban evasion. So thank you for raising this with me. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 14:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

536160 +++$+++ Tony Fox +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536160 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-01 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.162444320E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I note you're tagging this article for speedy deletion; I've been working with the author to explain the notability guidelines for websites after following up on a MedCab case, and had given him a couple of days to find proper sources; my intention is, if he cannot, to put it through AfD. My intention is to ensure that he doesn't feel the page's deletion is an attack in any way. Just for your information. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi there. I note you're tagging this article for speedy deletion; I've been working with the author to explain the notability guidelines for websites after following up on a MedCab case, and had given him a couple of days to find proper sources; my intention is, if he cannot, to put it through AfD. My intention is to ensure that he doesn't feel the page's deletion is an attack in any way. Just for your information. Thanks. [[User:Tony Fox|Tony Fox]] <small>[[User_talk:Tony Fox|(arf!)]]</small> 21:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
536161 +++$+++ Tony Fox +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536160 +++$+++ 536160 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.162464480E09 +++$+++ I do recognize that the site is likely not notable enough to meet WP:WEB, and I've said that to the author. Like I say, he looks like he wants to be a contributor, so I wanted to take it a little slower and offered an opportunity for him to add sources before taking it to deletion.  +++$+++ :I do recognize that the site is likely not notable enough to meet WP:WEB, and I've said that to the author. Like I say, he looks like he wants to be a contributor, so I wanted to take it a little slower and offered an opportunity for him to add sources before taking it to deletion. [[User:Tony Fox|Tony Fox]] <small>[[User_talk:Tony Fox|(arf!)]]</small> 02:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

11873 +++$+++ SkyLined +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-09 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.307675760E09 +++$+++ Hey, I saw you tried to change the font size in {{tl|su}}, which has a high impact on the layout. This template is widely used, so any changes will impact a lot of Wikipedia. There has been a long history of debates about font, font size and text location for this template and others that use it. The current settings where arrived at through consensus and other templates depend on these settings. I trust you'll understand why your changes were reverted. Might I suggest you consider suggesting changes on the talk pages before implementing them in such cases in the future? Thanks! &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style=\"white-space: nowrap\">\u2014  +++$+++ Hey, I saw you tried to change the font size in {{tl|su}}, which has a high impact on the layout. This template is widely used, so any changes will impact a lot of Wikipedia. There has been a long history of debates about font, font size and text location for this template and others that use it. The current settings where arrived at through consensus and other templates depend on these settings. I trust you'll understand why your changes were reverted. Might I suggest you consider suggesting changes on the talk pages before implementing them in such cases in the future? Thanks! &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style="white-space: nowrap">— [[User:SkyLined|<tt style="text-shadow:#80FF80 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; color:#008000;">SkyLined</tt>]] <small>([[User_talk:SkyLined|talk]])</small></span> 20:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
11874 +++$+++ SkyLined +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11873 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.307732640E09 +++$+++ You're missing the point: when considering non-trivial changes to widely used templates, you should not assume that you know what's best. A few days delay while waiting for feedback won't hurt Wikipedia, but accidentally messing up the layout of a lot pages will. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style=\"white-space: nowrap\">\u2014  +++$+++ ::You're missing the point: when considering non-trivial changes to widely used templates, you should not assume that you know what's best. A few days delay while waiting for feedback won't hurt Wikipedia, but accidentally messing up the layout of a lot pages will. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style="white-space: nowrap">— [[User:SkyLined|<tt style="text-shadow:#80FF80 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; color:#008000;">SkyLined</tt>]] <small>([[User_talk:SkyLined|talk]])</small></span> 12:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

526267 +++$+++ Kt66 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-23 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.159047480E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your help. I gave the links of all the sources I used (or suggest to use for the article) at the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Michael_Roach#All_three_sources_I_used_in_the_web.archive.org_archive talk page of GMR]. -- +++$+++ Thank you for your help. I gave the links of all the sources I used (or suggest to use for the article) at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Michael_Roach#All_three_sources_I_used_in_the_web.archive.org_archive talk page of GMR]. --[[User:Kt66|Kt66]] 14:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
526268 +++$+++ Kt66 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526267 +++$+++ 526267 +++$+++ 2006-09-23 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.159059240E09 +++$+++ Dear [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]], thank you it's not me, please check the IP's than you can see it. I think the rush of the new editor comes because it is a controversial topic, I think it's good to inlcude the bracket of controversial article at the tp. If you disagree, please remove it. Thank you very much. -- +++$+++ :Dear [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]], thank you it's not me, please check the IP's than you can see it. I think the rush of the new editor comes because it is a controversial topic, I think it's good to inlcude the bracket of controversial article at the tp. If you disagree, please remove it. Thank you very much. --[[User:Kt66|Kt66]] 17:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
526269 +++$+++ Kt66 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526267 +++$+++ 526268 +++$+++ 2006-09-23 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.159060140E09 +++$+++ User:Ekajati could give no reasons (although I asked) why the website is fulfilling that criterias, others argued that this website is hearsay, but if you know the stuff - although parsian in a way - it lists facts which are just facts and gives an alternative view to his activities. Also if you look the diamond-cutter.org site is dealing straight forward with the points which were named by user:Nat Krause as \"between the line\". -- +++$+++ ::User:Ekajati could give no reasons (although I asked) why the website is fulfilling that criterias, others argued that this website is hearsay, but if you know the stuff - although parsian in a way - it lists facts which are just facts and gives an alternative view to his activities. Also if you look the diamond-cutter.org site is dealing straight forward with the points which were named by user:Nat Krause as "between the line". --[[User:Kt66|Kt66]] 18:09, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

11876 +++$+++ Hohum +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11876 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-07 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.310098500E09 +++$+++ <s>Your edits to [[Battle of Osan]] removed the page numbers of many references. Please do not do this. Page numbers are required in references. I see that you have been told about this before. Please desist.<\/s> ( +++$+++ <s>Your edits to [[Battle of Osan]] removed the page numbers of many references. Please do not do this. Page numbers are required in references. I see that you have been told about this before. Please desist.</s> ([[User:Hohum|<font color="Green">'''Hohum'''</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Hohum|<font color="Red"><sup>@</sup></font>]]) 21:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
11877 +++$+++ Hohum +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11876 +++$+++ 11876 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.310158080E09 +++$+++ You changed citation styles without explanation or discussion. See [[WP:CITEVAR]]. ( +++$+++ :You changed citation styles without explanation or discussion. See [[WP:CITEVAR]]. ([[User:Hohum|<font color="Green">'''Hohum'''</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Hohum|<font color="Red"><sup>@</sup></font>]]) 13:48, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

11878 +++$+++  Sharktopus  +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.310156700E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Thanks for improving the orthography of [[Heydar Aliyev Foundation]]. You found quite a few things I missed, and I am grateful! <font style= \"font-family:sans-serif;color:black;\"><span style= \"text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class= texhtml\">''''' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for improving the orthography of [[Heydar Aliyev Foundation]]. You found quite a few things I missed, and I am grateful! <font style= "font-family:sans-serif;color:black;"><span style= "text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em; class= texhtml">'''''[[User:Sharktopus |Sharktopus]]'''''</span>[[user talk: Sharktopus |<sup>talk</sup></font>]] 13:25, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
11879 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11878 +++$+++ 11878 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310467620E09 +++$+++ It's also against much of [[WP:MOS]]. But repeated complaints and warnings seem to fall on deaf ears. I wonder if we should just form the Leandrod reversion cabal?  +++$+++ : It's also against much of [[WP:MOS]]. But repeated complaints and warnings seem to fall on deaf ears. I wonder if we should just form the Leandrod reversion cabal? [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 03:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
11880 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11878 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310562000E09 +++$+++ I've mentioned a few such points before. They're in the edit history on this page. But given your eagerness to \"improve\" so many points of typography and similar I would suggest that you read [[WP:MOS]] for yourself before continuing.  +++$+++ ::: I've mentioned a few such points before. They're in the edit history on this page. But given your eagerness to "improve" so many points of typography and similar I would suggest that you read [[WP:MOS]] for yourself before continuing. [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 06:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
11881 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11878 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.310562600E09 +++$+++ No, you never said anything about referencing I could find. \u2014  +++$+++ :::: No, you never said anything about referencing I could find. — [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] ([[User talk:Leandrod#top|talk]]) 06:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
11882 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11878 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.310570520E09 +++$+++ You're splitting hairs. I mentioned several MOS issues before. No, not specifically about referencing. Please become familiar with MOS, and not just the sections on referencing. If you disagree with MOS the right approach is to go to the talk pages there and argue for a change in MOS, not to blithely continue to edit against consensus even after the dozens of complaints here.  +++$+++ ::::: You're splitting hairs. I mentioned several MOS issues before. No, not specifically about referencing. Please become familiar with MOS, and not just the sections on referencing. If you disagree with MOS the right approach is to go to the talk pages there and argue for a change in MOS, not to blithely continue to edit against consensus even after the dozens of complaints here. [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 08:22, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
11883 +++$+++ SkyLined +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11878 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 09:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310576160E09 +++$+++ Leandro: it might be wise to consider why people are complaining before trying to prove their complaints unfounded or incorrect. Some complaints may not be worded correctly and\/or you may disagree with them, but they are rarely unfounded. Dismissing criticism or attacking the critic is not very constructive. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style=\"white-space: nowrap\">\u2014  +++$+++ ::::: Leandro: it might be wise to consider why people are complaining before trying to prove their complaints unfounded or incorrect. Some complaints may not be worded correctly and/or you may disagree with them, but they are rarely unfounded. Dismissing criticism or attacking the critic is not very constructive. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style="white-space: nowrap">— [[User:SkyLined|<tt style="text-shadow:#80FF80 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; color:#008000;">SkyLined</tt>]] <small>([[User_talk:SkyLined|talk]])</small></span> 09:56, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
11884 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11878 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.310578260E09 +++$+++ At the risk of piling it on, it should be said that your response to my queries above (and yes, later my complaint) about your referencing system was also uncalled for - ie, berating me for not succeeding in finding information on it myself. Ie, one shouldn't turn issues about their editing into issues about ''oneself''. -- +++$+++ ::::: At the risk of piling it on, it should be said that your response to my queries above (and yes, later my complaint) about your referencing system was also uncalled for - ie, berating me for not succeeding in finding information on it myself. Ie, one shouldn't turn issues about their editing into issues about ''oneself''. --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 10:31, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
11885 +++$+++ Peter Isotalo +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11878 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311086040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::[[User:Peter Isotalo|Peter]] <sup>[[User talk:Peter Isotalo|Isotalo]]</sup> 07:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

89361 +++$+++ Emdelrio +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-16 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.287266400E09 +++$+++ Dr. Kohl, I wonder with your resources\/access if you might be able to help me with finding the dates of the above named composer. He must have been a very minor one in that it has been impossible for me to find anything. I know of him in that he wrote a delightfully picturesque piece which serves as a wonderful encore (in the \"after-dinner-mint\" vein, evidently his only published work) called \"The Musical Box: A Caprice\" dedicated to Isabelle Schuster, and published by Robert Cocks and Co., London. I was able to purchase a PDF of it from the National Library of Australia which lists the date of publication as \"187?\". I already checked an old 3rd edition of Groves. (This work was transposed and simplified slightly by William Smallwood and published by the same publisher as No.14 of a series called \"Home Treasures.\") Don't knock yourself out over this, but if you find this I believe you will be the only man on planet earth alive who knows it ... until you share it with me :)  +++$+++ Dr. Kohl, I wonder with your resources/access if you might be able to help me with finding the dates of the above named composer. He must have been a very minor one in that it has been impossible for me to find anything. I know of him in that he wrote a delightfully picturesque piece which serves as a wonderful encore (in the "after-dinner-mint" vein, evidently his only published work) called "The Musical Box: A Caprice" dedicated to Isabelle Schuster, and published by Robert Cocks and Co., London. I was able to purchase a PDF of it from the National Library of Australia which lists the date of publication as "187?". I already checked an old 3rd edition of Groves. (This work was transposed and simplified slightly by William Smallwood and published by the same publisher as No.14 of a series called "Home Treasures.") Don't knock yourself out over this, but if you find this I believe you will be the only man on planet earth alive who knows it ... until you share it with me :) [[User:Emdelrio|Emdelrio]] ([[User talk:Emdelrio|talk]]) 15:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
89362 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89361 +++$+++ 89361 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.287292080E09 +++$+++ refers to the same person (as seems likely), then his full name was Immanuel Christoph Albert Erdmann Liebich, and he was born in Silesia or Prussia in 1823, was married in London in 1856 to Agnes Julie Mehlhorn, and they had at least two children, Rudolf (christened in 1869), and Franz, However, since this Franz seems to have been listed in Who's Who already by 1860, there may be something wrong with this evidence. I have checked the first edition of Grove's Dictionary (vol. 2, 1880, which includes entires beginning with L), with no result. Still, it's a start.\u2014 +++$+++ : refers to the same person (as seems likely), then his full name was Immanuel Christoph Albert Erdmann Liebich, and he was born in Silesia or Prussia in 1823, was married in London in 1856 to Agnes Julie Mehlhorn, and they had at least two children, Rudolf (christened in 1869), and Franz, However, since this Franz seems to have been listed in Who's Who already by 1860, there may be something wrong with this evidence. I have checked the first edition of Grove's Dictionary (vol. 2, 1880, which includes entires beginning with L), with no result. Still, it's a start.—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 22:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

274024 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-25 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.188067440E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. I would like an admin not involved in the ScoutingWikiProject to look at [[WP:ANI#Johntex.27s_dishonesty_.28BSA.29]]. The project has a few admins but as this involves one of them and it'd look bad of one of us (I'm an admin too and the project coord) took action. I'd like a neutral admin to look at it. I found you because of the post you made on Slim's thread. In the Johntex thread, I personally have to agree with the posts made by [[User:ThuranX]], that this is a single purpose account that is blockable indefinitely for the disruption and point pushing. Make your own decision. I support whatever you decide.  +++$+++ Hi Sarah. I would like an admin not involved in the ScoutingWikiProject to look at [[WP:ANI#Johntex.27s_dishonesty_.28BSA.29]]. The project has a few admins but as this involves one of them and it'd look bad of one of us (I'm an admin too and the project coord) took action. I'd like a neutral admin to look at it. I found you because of the post you made on Slim's thread. In the Johntex thread, I personally have to agree with the posts made by [[User:ThuranX]], that this is a single purpose account that is blockable indefinitely for the disruption and point pushing. Make your own decision. I support whatever you decide. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 11:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
274025 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274024 +++$+++ 274024 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.188237960E09 +++$+++ Sorry Rlevse, I'm not ignoring you, I've just been really, really busy. ''' +++$+++ :Sorry Rlevse, I'm not ignoring you, I've just been really, really busy. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 11:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

569959 +++$+++ ConfuciusOrnis +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-23 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.182615540E09 +++$+++ Just thought I'd bring them to your attention.  +++$+++ Just thought I'd bring them to your attention. [[User:ConfuciusOrnis|ornis]] 09:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
569960 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569959 +++$+++ 569959 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.182659040E09 +++$+++ Thanks, now deleted.  You could mark them for deletion yourself, it's not an issue. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks, now deleted.  You could mark them for deletion yourself, it's not an issue. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:24, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

274028 +++$+++ Jreferee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274028 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-25 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.188087840E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. Based on [[Talk:Perverted-Justice#PJ_redirecting_links_from_Wikipedia|this thread]] and the threads at [[Talk:Michael_Moore#Moore_Web_site|this article talk page]], I started [[Wikipedia:External_links#Deactivating_outgoing_links|Wikipedia:External links - Deactivating outgoing links]]. Would you mind looking at [[Wikipedia:External_links#Deactivating_outgoing_links|Wikipedia:External links - Deactivating outgoing links]] and revising it as needed. Also, if you think it appropriate, would you deactivate the relevant outgoing links in [[Michael Moore|this article]]. Thanks. -- <font face=\"Kristen ITC\">''' +++$+++ Hi Sarah. Based on [[Talk:Perverted-Justice#PJ_redirecting_links_from_Wikipedia|this thread]] and the threads at [[Talk:Michael_Moore#Moore_Web_site|this article talk page]], I started [[Wikipedia:External_links#Deactivating_outgoing_links|Wikipedia:External links - Deactivating outgoing links]]. Would you mind looking at [[Wikipedia:External_links#Deactivating_outgoing_links|Wikipedia:External links - Deactivating outgoing links]] and revising it as needed. Also, if you think it appropriate, would you deactivate the relevant outgoing links in [[Michael Moore|this article]]. Thanks. -- <font face="Kristen ITC">'''[[User:Jreferee|<font color="Blue">Jreferee</font>]]''' <sup>''([[User talk:Jreferee|Talk]])''</sup></font> 17:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
274029 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274028 +++$+++ 274028 +++$+++ 2007-08-25 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.188090000E09 +++$+++ Okay, mate, I'm checking it all out now, but it is after 3:00 AM here in my corner of Australia, and my brain is in [[slow motion|slo mo]] and I might take a bit longer. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Okay, mate, I'm checking it all out now, but it is after 3:00 AM here in my corner of Australia, and my brain is in [[slow motion|slo mo]] and I might take a bit longer. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 18:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
274030 +++$+++ Jreferee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274028 +++$+++ 274029 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.188129780E09 +++$+++ The only delinking example I know of is the PJ matter. I was impressed with the [[Solomon#Wisdom_of_Solomon|Solomon]] like decision. The mm.com links do not surpass the PJ example. My interest there was listing the idea for discussion. I was hoping that you were more familiar with this technique to provide more clarity on when delinking is appropriate and when it is not. If you know of other delinking decisions, please feel free to provide me the links. With enough examples, I probably can come up with some language to give others better guidance when this issue comes up again. -- <font face=\"Kristen ITC\">''' +++$+++ ::The only delinking example I know of is the PJ matter. I was impressed with the [[Solomon#Wisdom_of_Solomon|Solomon]] like decision. The mm.com links do not surpass the PJ example. My interest there was listing the idea for discussion. I was hoping that you were more familiar with this technique to provide more clarity on when delinking is appropriate and when it is not. If you know of other delinking decisions, please feel free to provide me the links. With enough examples, I probably can come up with some language to give others better guidance when this issue comes up again. -- <font face="Kristen ITC">'''[[User:Jreferee|<font color="Blue">Jreferee</font>]]''' <sup>''([[User talk:Jreferee|Talk]])''</sup></font> 05:03, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
274031 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274028 +++$+++ 274030 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.188238920E09 +++$+++ No, I don't know of any other cases that were similar to PJ. I would think it would be a fairly unusual situation for a website to redirect all our referral traffic to a special page set up to criticise us and then link them to an outing page. I agree with your idea in principle, but do you think it needs special MOS guidelines or do you think it would fall under exercising good sense? Making it part of a guideline or policy might be like BEANS. I'm not sure. Anyway, I see the mm.com issue as being a different issue, as I explained the other day. I think people have to decide if it is a good site or it isn't a good site and I don't see delinking particularly useful because it seems to me that the only thing that would do is cause inconvenience to readers who would have to copy and paste. It won't change the outcome of them visiting that site and what they see when they get there, which is the difference with the PJ delinking -  it stopped Wikipedia's referral traffic being diverted.  ''' +++$+++ :::No, I don't know of any other cases that were similar to PJ. I would think it would be a fairly unusual situation for a website to redirect all our referral traffic to a special page set up to criticise us and then link them to an outing page. I agree with your idea in principle, but do you think it needs special MOS guidelines or do you think it would fall under exercising good sense? Making it part of a guideline or policy might be like BEANS. I'm not sure. Anyway, I see the mm.com issue as being a different issue, as I explained the other day. I think people have to decide if it is a good site or it isn't a good site and I don't see delinking particularly useful because it seems to me that the only thing that would do is cause inconvenience to readers who would have to copy and paste. It won't change the outcome of them visiting that site and what they see when they get there, which is the difference with the PJ delinking -  it stopped Wikipedia's referral traffic being diverted.  '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 11:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

11887 +++$+++ Epipelagic +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311158040E09 +++$+++ Why are you changing, apparently without any agreement, all the citation formats in [[Planetary boundaries]] to what appears to be your personal preference. The citation are already consistently formatted in a considered style, and for good reasons. Among other things, the massive use of templates like this makes it difficult to maintain complex articles, as you will already know if you write articles like that yourself. It use to be that you did not just barge onto an article other people have spent a lot of time writing, and unilaterally format the citations to suit yourself. You were meant to first establish whether there was a consensus for such a change on the article talk page. If the guidelines have changed, and the (often inadequate) templates are now required, then I apologize for being so out of touch. But if they have not, then what do you think you are doing? -- +++$+++ Why are you changing, apparently without any agreement, all the citation formats in [[Planetary boundaries]] to what appears to be your personal preference. The citation are already consistently formatted in a considered style, and for good reasons. Among other things, the massive use of templates like this makes it difficult to maintain complex articles, as you will already know if you write articles like that yourself. It use to be that you did not just barge onto an article other people have spent a lot of time writing, and unilaterally format the citations to suit yourself. You were meant to first establish whether there was a consensus for such a change on the article talk page. If the guidelines have changed, and the (often inadequate) templates are now required, then I apologize for being so out of touch. But if they have not, then what do you think you are doing? --[[User:Epipelagic|Epipelagic]] ([[User talk:Epipelagic|talk]]) 03:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
11888 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11887 +++$+++ 11887 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.311158580E09 +++$+++ \u2014  +++$+++ : — [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] ([[User talk:Leandrod#top|talk]]) 03:43, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
11889 +++$+++ J. Johnson +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11887 +++$+++ 11888 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.311837600E09 +++$+++ Are you still with us on [[Planetary boundaries]]?  Sure, both of you guys should pull your horns in a bit, but I think there is scope for all us to work out some improvements. I hope you will join me [[Talk:Planetary boundaries|there]] to work out the details. -  +++$+++ ::Are you still with us on [[Planetary boundaries]]?  Sure, both of you guys should pull your horns in a bit, but I think there is scope for all us to work out some improvements. I hope you will join me [[Talk:Planetary boundaries|there]] to work out the details. - [[User:J. Johnson|J. Johnson (JJ)]] ([[User talk:J. Johnson|talk]]) 00:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

274032 +++$+++ THF +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-25 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.188097380E09 +++$+++ I leave that to your discretion.  If it's relatively easy to delete older versions, and it won't be called a cover-up, then please feel free. Thank you!  +++$+++ I leave that to your discretion.  If it's relatively easy to delete older versions, and it won't be called a cover-up, then please feel free. Thank you! [[User:THF|THF]] 20:03, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
274033 +++$+++ Dude Manchap +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274032 +++$+++ 274032 +++$+++ 2007-08-25 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.188106260E09 +++$+++ It will be called a cover-up, and a rather pointless, at that. -- +++$+++ :It will be called a cover-up, and a rather pointless, at that. --[[User:Dude Manchap|Dude Manchap]] 22:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

11890 +++$+++ Dicklyon +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.311853800E09 +++$+++ It would be best if you'd stop removing digits altogether, but if you insist on taking them out of years, you MUST leave exactly 2 digits, not 1, not 3.   +++$+++ It would be best if you'd stop removing digits altogether, but if you insist on taking them out of years, you MUST leave exactly 2 digits, not 1, not 3.  [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 04:50, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
11891 +++$+++ DMacks +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11890 +++$+++ 11890 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311854460E09 +++$+++ Note that you were warned about this exact issue years ago. It is now time for you to stop. I'd hate to see an editor with a long history of cleanups get blocked for a similarly long history of disregarding consensus standards.  +++$+++ :Note that you were warned about this exact issue years ago. It is now time for you to stop. I'd hate to see an editor with a long history of cleanups get blocked for a similarly long history of disregarding consensus standards. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 05:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

274036 +++$+++ Iamunknown +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274036 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-28 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.188325980E09 +++$+++ A more effective solution than deactivating or removing the external links would have been to use [[Template:Derefer]], which strips the referrer URL information from the HTTP request.  -- +++$+++ A more effective solution than deactivating or removing the external links would have been to use [[Template:Derefer]], which strips the referrer URL information from the HTTP request.  --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 11:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
274037 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274036 +++$+++ 274036 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.188326580E09 +++$+++ Thanks Iam, I didn't know about the template. I will take a look at it and add it to my list. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Thanks Iam, I didn't know about the template. I will take a look at it and add it to my list. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 11:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
274038 +++$+++ Iamunknown +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274036 +++$+++ 274037 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.188326700E09 +++$+++ One thing though: I intend to see if the server admins would be willing to set up a page like that on the wikipedia server .. otherwise, someone could use the hijack the page the template links to and redirect it to a malicious website.  So it isn't the best solution yet.  -- +++$+++ :: One thing though: I intend to see if the server admins would be willing to set up a page like that on the wikipedia server .. otherwise, someone could use the hijack the page the template links to and redirect it to a malicious website.  So it isn't the best solution yet.  --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 11:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

11894 +++$+++ Gareth E Kegg +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.312221840E09 +++$+++ I wish you had discussed the move at Tom Jobim's talk page. He himself didn't use the circumflex, and it isn't featured on any of his album covers. It may be grammatically correct, but if that were a case closer, then there wouldn't be ten million words on Novak Djokovic.  +++$+++ I wish you had discussed the move at Tom Jobim's talk page. He himself didn't use the circumflex, and it isn't featured on any of his album covers. It may be grammatically correct, but if that were a case closer, then there wouldn't be ten million words on Novak Djokovic. [[User:Gareth E Kegg|Gareth E Kegg]] ([[User talk:Gareth E Kegg|talk]]) 11:04, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
11895 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11894 +++$+++ 11894 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.312224480E09 +++$+++ Reverted, consistent with longstanding consensus on the article talk page, also with [[WP:MOS]].  +++$+++ : Reverted, consistent with longstanding consensus on the article talk page, also with [[WP:MOS]]. [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 11:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
11896 +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11894 +++$+++ 11894 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.312236480E09 +++$+++ \u2014  +++$+++ : — [[User:Leandrod|Leandro GFC Dutra]] ([[User talk:Leandrod#top|talk]]) 15:08, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
11897 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Leandrod +++$+++ 11894 +++$+++ 11896 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.312252200E09 +++$+++ There is the very first section on the talk page, the one named \"Circumflex accent. Also on the talk page there is a giant green block of archived discussion under \"Requested move\". From [[WP:MOS]], section 2.1 \"Article titles\", the very first bullet item links to [[WP:Naming conventions (use English)]]. There it says \"Follow the general usage in reliable sources that are written in the English language\".  +++$+++ :: There is the very first section on the talk page, the one named "Circumflex accent. Also on the talk page there is a giant green block of archived discussion under "Requested move". From [[WP:MOS]], section 2.1 "Article titles", the very first bullet item links to [[WP:Naming conventions (use English)]]. There it says "Follow the general usage in reliable sources that are written in the English language". [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 19:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

274040 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-30 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.188511800E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. I read that you're sourcing references for Lyall Howard. I just added to the article, with a new section about a battlefield meeting with his father. It adds a further aspect to his notability. All the best,  +++$+++ Hi Sarah. I read that you're sourcing references for Lyall Howard. I just added to the article, with a new section about a battlefield meeting with his father. It adds a further aspect to his notability. All the best, [[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 15:10, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
274041 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274040 +++$+++ 274040 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.188550020E09 +++$+++ Also, regarding the word \"dummies\" in the New Guinea section, it's a rather unfortunate word (it could be confused with \"idiot\". I considered alternate words, but the problem is that all the historic documents of the time use the word ''dummies'', so it's a bit hard to avoid it. +++$+++ :Also, regarding the word "dummies" in the New Guinea section, it's a rather unfortunate word (it could be confused with "idiot". I considered alternate words, but the problem is that all the historic documents of the time use the word ''dummies'', so it's a bit hard to avoid it.[[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 01:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
274042 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274040 +++$+++ 274041 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.188550980E09 +++$+++ Proxy is an alternate word. The only problem with any alternate word is that we'd have to rip out the historical quotes from the New Guinea Administrator and the Auditor General's report that both use the word \"dummying\". I'm glad you found some more material, but I haven't received that email yet. Can you resend please? Somehow I feel that the article already has more aspects of notability than so many other biographies in Wikipedia, but I guess it has to be proven to an extra degree. You don't think the million-to-one battlefield reunion of father & son is worthy of the intro? I'm happy with any intro that saves the article from being deleted, but I wonder if removal of historic events (like that reunion) may reduce the apparent notability? Thanks for all your assistance with this article, +++$+++ ::Proxy is an alternate word. The only problem with any alternate word is that we'd have to rip out the historical quotes from the New Guinea Administrator and the Auditor General's report that both use the word "dummying". I'm glad you found some more material, but I haven't received that email yet. Can you resend please? Somehow I feel that the article already has more aspects of notability than so many other biographies in Wikipedia, but I guess it has to be proven to an extra degree. You don't think the million-to-one battlefield reunion of father & son is worthy of the intro? I'm happy with any intro that saves the article from being deleted, but I wonder if removal of historic events (like that reunion) may reduce the apparent notability? Thanks for all your assistance with this article,[[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 02:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
274043 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274040 +++$+++ 274042 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.188554220E09 +++$+++ Sorry, Sarah, I was re-editing the plantation info at the same time you were adjusting the headings. When I pasted the new rework back into the article, the heading came back with it. Can you review those headings again? I have stuffed it up for you now. However the plantation info is reworded to show it was not illegal, so maybe that's enough to satisfy other editors, even with a heading. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Sorry, Sarah, I was re-editing the plantation info at the same time you were adjusting the headings. When I pasted the new rework back into the article, the heading came back with it. Can you review those headings again? I have stuffed it up for you now. However the plantation info is reworded to show it was not illegal, so maybe that's enough to satisfy other editors, even with a heading. Cheers, [[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 02:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
274044 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274040 +++$+++ 274043 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.188554880E09 +++$+++ Not intending to overwrite your headings, but I reinserted them just as a temporary measure. Please change them again if you think this doesn't work. I'd really love to put a b&w photo in the War section, but I must investigate copyright first. +++$+++ ::::Not intending to overwrite your headings, but I reinserted them just as a temporary measure. Please change them again if you think this doesn't work. I'd really love to put a b&w photo in the War section, but I must investigate copyright first.[[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 03:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
274045 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274040 +++$+++ 274044 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.188555480E09 +++$+++ Hey, the articles really coming along. I like the new intro & references. The Roy Masters one is the only one I can see that already exists in Notes. I used the one from The Age 'A Family Meeting Against All Odds' (same article), but either one would do. +++$+++ :::::Hey, the articles really coming along. I like the new intro & references. The Roy Masters one is the only one I can see that already exists in Notes. I used the one from The Age 'A Family Meeting Against All Odds' (same article), but either one would do.[[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 03:18, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
274046 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274040 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.188557760E09 +++$+++ Do you know if there is someone I can ask for advice regarding the copyright of the image? Just to find out if it could actually be listed as free. +++$+++ :::::::Do you know if there is someone I can ask for advice regarding the copyright of the image? Just to find out if it could actually be listed as free.[[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 03:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
274047 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274040 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.188558120E09 +++$+++ Ah. I see what you've done for the tag. Thank you very much, Sarah. +++$+++ :::::::Ah. I see what you've done for the tag. Thank you very much, Sarah.[[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 04:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

526271 +++$+++ Frogsprog +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.159127280E09 +++$+++ You say my userbox is innapropriate because it is innapropriate for wikipedia, in which case why not ask those with 9\/11 tribute boxes to remove them :-) -- +++$+++ You say my userbox is innapropriate because it is innapropriate for wikipedia, in which case why not ask those with 9/11 tribute boxes to remove them :-) --[[User:Frogsprog|Frogsprog]] 12:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
526272 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526271 +++$+++ 526271 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.159130820E09 +++$+++ From [[WP:Userpage]]: \"What can I not have on my userpage .... Personal statements that could be considered [[polemic|polemical]]....\" &mdash;  +++$+++ :From [[WP:Userpage]]: "What can I not have on my userpage .... Personal statements that could be considered [[polemic|polemical]]...." &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 13:47, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

351509 +++$+++ Sugarpine +++$+++ Kpjas +++$+++ 351509 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-11 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.158009840E09 +++$+++ Who's doing the interwiki report this week? <font color=\"blue\">[[User:Sugarpine|Sugar]]<\/font><font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ Who's doing the interwiki report this week? <font color="blue">[[User:Sugarpine|Sugar]]</font><font color="green">[[User:Sugarpine|pine]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Sugarpine|t]]</sup> 14:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
351510 +++$+++ Sugarpine +++$+++ Kpjas +++$+++ 351509 +++$+++ 351509 +++$+++ 2006-09-11 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.158038400E09 +++$+++ Hey, if you need any help with interwiki reports let me know. BTW, sorry if this was wrong of me, but I've already asked around in the Japanese Wikipedia for someone to do an interwiki report there. Let me know what help you need, and btw, Treebark might be back soon. <font color=\"blue\">[[User:Sugarpine|Sugar]]<\/font><font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :Hey, if you need any help with interwiki reports let me know. BTW, sorry if this was wrong of me, but I've already asked around in the Japanese Wikipedia for someone to do an interwiki report there. Let me know what help you need, and btw, Treebark might be back soon. <font color="blue">[[User:Sugarpine|Sugar]]</font><font color="green">[[User:Sugarpine|pine]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Sugarpine|t]]</sup> 22:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

274048 +++$+++ RS2007 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-02 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.188764040E09 +++$+++ Hello Sarah! I didn't knew that talk pages aren't usually deleted. Thank you for the reply. Good luck!  +++$+++ Hello Sarah! I didn't knew that talk pages aren't usually deleted. Thank you for the reply. Good luck! [[User:RS2007|RS2007]] 13:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
274049 +++$+++ RS2007 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274048 +++$+++ 274048 +++$+++ 2007-09-02 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.188764460E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the reply. I would like to change my user name. What should I do?  +++$+++ :Thank you for the reply. I would like to change my user name. What should I do? [[User:RS2007|RS2007]] 13:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
274050 +++$+++ RS 1900 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274048 +++$+++ 274049 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.188833760E09 +++$+++ Sarah, thank you for the help! You are a great admin. I am still relatively new on Wikipedia. Thus, I didn't know all the rules. Good luck!  +++$+++ ::Sarah, thank you for the help! You are a great admin. I am still relatively new on Wikipedia. Thus, I didn't know all the rules. Good luck! [[User:RS 1900|RS1900]] 08:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
274051 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274048 +++$+++ 274050 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.188833940E09 +++$+++ Okay, no problems. Good luck to you, too. I'm glad to see you got your new name. Thanks, ''' +++$+++ :::Okay, no problems. Good luck to you, too. I'm glad to see you got your new name. Thanks, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 08:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

274052 +++$+++ Kaystar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274052 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-03 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.188846060E09 +++$+++ If I am using an image from wikipedia which in '''public domain''' on the '''Front Page''' of my magazine, is it compulssary to give the credit to wikipedia as [Source: Wikipedia] or shall I mention the source without bolding it. +++$+++ If I am using an image from wikipedia which in '''public domain''' on the '''Front Page''' of my magazine, is it compulssary to give the credit to wikipedia as [Source: Wikipedia] or shall I mention the source without bolding it.[[User:Kaystar|Kaystar]] 12:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
274053 +++$+++ Alison +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274052 +++$+++ 274052 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.188858840E09 +++$+++ If it's truly [[public domain]], then you can do whatever you like with it with or without attributing a source (though it's always nice to credit the  author) -  +++$+++ : If it's truly [[public domain]], then you can do whatever you like with it with or without attributing a source (though it's always nice to credit the  author) - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#558; font-family: comic sans ms; font-variant: small-caps">'''A<font color= "#7070a0">l<font color= "#9090c0">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] [[User talk:Alison|☺]] 15:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
274054 +++$+++ Kaystar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274052 +++$+++ 274053 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.188861960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. +++$+++ ::Thanks.[[User:Kaystar|Kaystar]] 16:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
274055 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274052 +++$+++ 274053 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.188862620E09 +++$+++ Yes, thanks Alison. :) Much appreciated. ''' +++$+++ ::Yes, thanks Alison. :) Much appreciated. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 16:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

526273 +++$+++ Frogsprog +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526273 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.159149780E09 +++$+++ come on lighten up, its a tag that I didn't make myself, and it can be put on articles that are frequently vandalised! its humour!! -- +++$+++ come on lighten up, its a tag that I didn't make myself, and it can be put on articles that are frequently vandalised! its humour!! --[[User:Frogsprog|Frogsprog]] 19:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
526274 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526273 +++$+++ 526273 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.159158060E09 +++$+++ This is a serious encylopedia. &mdash;  +++$+++ * This is a serious encylopedia. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 21:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

274056 +++$+++ Shot info +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-10 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.189446480E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah (aka, one of my many personalities :-), I'm leaving the newbie up to you.  He really isn't listening (unfortunately) and I don't have the interest to revert his vandalism.  Thanks '''<font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ Hi Sarah (aka, one of my many personalities :-), I'm leaving the newbie up to you.  He really isn't listening (unfortunately) and I don't have the interest to revert his vandalism.  Thanks '''<font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Shot info|<font color="#8000" size="2">Shot info</font>]]</font>''' 10:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
274057 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274056 +++$+++ 274056 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.189447380E09 +++$+++ Hehe, thanks. :) I've just blocked him for 24 hours for continuing to edit war on [[Kangaroo court\u200e]]. Hopefully that will give him a chance to calm down and review some of the policies and guidelines before he ends up with a much longer block. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Hehe, thanks. :) I've just blocked him for 24 hours for continuing to edit war on [[Kangaroo court‎]]. Hopefully that will give him a chance to calm down and review some of the policies and guidelines before he ends up with a much longer block. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 11:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
274058 +++$+++ Shot info +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274056 +++$+++ 274057 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.189447620E09 +++$+++ Okies.  '''<font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ ::Okies.  '''<font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Shot info|<font color="#8000" size="2">Shot info</font>]]</font>''' 11:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

569964 +++$+++ Cholga +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569964 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-29 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.183116480E09 +++$+++ could you help me resolving issues on [[Richmond, California]] regarding [[:User:ILike2BeAnonymous|ILikeToBeAnonymous]]? hes very rude and called me an idiot and keeps going against consensus<sup> +++$+++ could you help me resolving issues on [[Richmond, California]] regarding [[:User:ILike2BeAnonymous|ILikeToBeAnonymous]]? hes very rude and called me an idiot and keeps going against consensus<sup>[[User:Cholga|Cholga is a '''SUPERSTAR''']]</sup><small>[[User_talk:Cholga|¡Talk2Cholga!]]</small><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Cholga|''Sexy Contribs'']]</sub> 04:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
569965 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569964 +++$+++ 569964 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.183118220E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ARichmond%2C_California&diff=141326301&oldid=141324988 Looks like you two have a bit of history together].  Judging by the article Talk page history, I think that following the [[:Wikipedia:Resolving disputes|dispute resolution process]] with this editor would be better than issuing a simple 3RR warning.  He has asked for a [[:Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser\/Case\/Qrc2006|Checkuser against you for sockpuppetry]].  I don't suggest responding in kind but if it is a baseless accusation you can use it to demonstrate your integrity as an editor and show harrassment.  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARichmond%2C_California&diff=141326301&oldid=141324988 Looks like you two have a bit of history together].  Judging by the article Talk page history, I think that following the [[:Wikipedia:Resolving disputes|dispute resolution process]] with this editor would be better than issuing a simple 3RR warning.  He has asked for a [[:Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Qrc2006|Checkuser against you for sockpuppetry]].  I don't suggest responding in kind but if it is a baseless accusation you can use it to demonstrate your integrity as an editor and show harrassment. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 04:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
569966 +++$+++ Cholga +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569964 +++$+++ 569965 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.183120740E09 +++$+++ i don't know how to find all the \"diff\"s i have a spacial learning disability, could you help me? i honestly belive a 3rr warning would remedy the situation. where can you report harrassment then since it is unfounded i am not a sockpuppet this is my only profile or username. how do you make the mediation request i tried before but they told me i did it wrong and they wouldnt do it if i didnt do it right could you help?<sup> +++$+++ ::i don't know how to find all the "diff"s i have a spacial learning disability, could you help me? i honestly belive a 3rr warning would remedy the situation. where can you report harrassment then since it is unfounded i am not a sockpuppet this is my only profile or username. how do you make the mediation request i tried before but they told me i did it wrong and they wouldnt do it if i didnt do it right could you help?<sup>[[User:Cholga|Cholga is a '''SUPERSTAR''']]</sup><small>[[User_talk:Cholga|¡Talk2Cholga!]]</small><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Cholga|''Sexy Contribs'']]</sub> 05:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

274059 +++$+++ Morfal +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.189735740E09 +++$+++ Hello! I created the Matthew Delooze page on the french wikipedia, I'm the [[:fr:Utilisateur:D. Diderot]] guy, I saw your comment that you wanted to try to help save the page from deletion by puting some ads and I wanted to salute you for that! And ooooooohhhhh I see that you're a powerful admin on the english wikipedia... woaow! :-) Usually admins are always on my back trying to warn me for too much discussion-forum like (specially ironics comments on other users) or deletion of my pages... The english page was deleted before I completed the translation... :-) You seem to speak french very fluently! Where did you get your interest on Matthew Delooze? \u2665 -- +++$+++ Hello! I created the Matthew Delooze page on the french wikipedia, I'm the [[:fr:Utilisateur:D. Diderot]] guy, I saw your comment that you wanted to try to help save the page from deletion by puting some ads and I wanted to salute you for that! And ooooooohhhhh I see that you're a powerful admin on the english wikipedia... woaow! :-) Usually admins are always on my back trying to warn me for too much discussion-forum like (specially ironics comments on other users) or deletion of my pages... The english page was deleted before I completed the translation... :-) You seem to speak french very fluently! Where did you get your interest on Matthew Delooze? ♥ --[[User:Morfal|Morfal]] 19:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
274060 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274059 +++$+++ 274059 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.189756440E09 +++$+++ Hey Morfal. Regrettably, my French is not very good...I have rarely used it since I finished school. I do not know anything about Matthew Delooze; I was only removing the English interwiki from the French Wikipedia because the article here had been deleted. While I was there, I noticed some format problems, so I fixed them as well. If you really feel that Matthew Delooze meets the English [[WP:N|notability]] guidelines, you could try writing a new version in your userspace and then when you have completely finished it, ask for it to be reviewed. It isn't good to post things into the English Wikipedia mainspace before you've finished them because the New Page people work very quickly and will tag it for deletion before you have a chance to come back and finish. But I don't recommend spending your time on this unless you feel you can make a strong case for his notability because we are quite strict about notability here. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Hey Morfal. Regrettably, my French is not very good...I have rarely used it since I finished school. I do not know anything about Matthew Delooze; I was only removing the English interwiki from the French Wikipedia because the article here had been deleted. While I was there, I noticed some format problems, so I fixed them as well. If you really feel that Matthew Delooze meets the English [[WP:N|notability]] guidelines, you could try writing a new version in your userspace and then when you have completely finished it, ask for it to be reviewed. It isn't good to post things into the English Wikipedia mainspace before you've finished them because the New Page people work very quickly and will tag it for deletion before you have a chance to come back and finish. But I don't recommend spending your time on this unless you feel you can make a strong case for his notability because we are quite strict about notability here. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 00:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

11917 +++$+++ The Fish +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11917 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.190352540E09 +++$+++ As you saw, I was trying to flesh out the Lain article but obviously I was putting too much detail in; how much exactly can be put in? At the moment it seems fairly detailed (e.g. talking about Lain seeing an older Alice implying she hasn't aged and that there's something amazing about Lain) but the choice of details seems totally random. Would it be better to just purge the plot description to be very vague and spoiler-free?  +++$+++ As you saw, I was trying to flesh out the Lain article but obviously I was putting too much detail in; how much exactly can be put in? At the moment it seems fairly detailed (e.g. talking about Lain seeing an older Alice implying she hasn't aged and that there's something amazing about Lain) but the choice of details seems totally random. Would it be better to just purge the plot description to be very vague and spoiler-free? [[User:The Fish|The Fish]] 22:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
11918 +++$+++ The Fish +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11917 +++$+++ 11917 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.190415600E09 +++$+++ Alright, thanks for the info!  +++$+++ :Alright, thanks for the info! [[User:The Fish|The Fish]] 16:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

536207 +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536207 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.164855300E09 +++$+++ I don't really need to look at your archives. [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] is emotionally invested in a vendetta against [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]] and apparently any article which Rosencomet has ever touched. IMO, she is not rational about this. - +++$+++ I don't really need to look at your archives. [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] is emotionally invested in a vendetta against [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]] and apparently any article which Rosencomet has ever touched. IMO, she is not rational about this. -[[User:999|999]] ([[User_talk:999|Talk]]) 18:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
536208 +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536207 +++$+++ 536207 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.164861180E09 +++$+++ After looking at your talk archives, I'd say that she has definitely violated [[WP:CIVIL]] with her insistent, repetitive and uncivilly toned comments. But you'd better confer with another admin about it. But be aware that there has been some sort of coordination between certain admins to \"save\" Mattisse despite her previous deceptive and abusive use of sockpuppet and continuing disruption. The problem is that she makes many useful contributions to WP, but whenever she get into a conflict she intentionally escalates it rather than trying to find a compromise. She insists that only her interpretation of policies and guidelines is correct and won't quit until she gets her way, no matter how many editors disagree with her or explain their understanding of how policies and guidelines could be used and interpreted in ways different from hers. - +++$+++ :After looking at your talk archives, I'd say that she has definitely violated [[WP:CIVIL]] with her insistent, repetitive and uncivilly toned comments. But you'd better confer with another admin about it. But be aware that there has been some sort of coordination between certain admins to "save" Mattisse despite her previous deceptive and abusive use of sockpuppet and continuing disruption. The problem is that she makes many useful contributions to WP, but whenever she get into a conflict she intentionally escalates it rather than trying to find a compromise. She insists that only her interpretation of policies and guidelines is correct and won't quit until she gets her way, no matter how many editors disagree with her or explain their understanding of how policies and guidelines could be used and interpreted in ways different from hers. -[[User:999|999]] ([[User_talk:999|Talk]]) 20:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

11920 +++$+++ Juhachi +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-14 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.192375560E09 +++$+++ I got the dates from MediaWork's website regarding old issues of Dengeki Comic Gao. When I looked through all the issues in 2005, I only found 3 that contained Blue Drop: [http:\/\/www.mediaworks.co.jp\/magazine\/backno\/gao_200509.php September 2005], [http:\/\/www.mediaworks.co.jp\/magazine\/backno\/gao_200512.php December 2005], and [http:\/\/www.mediaworks.co.jp\/magazine\/backno\/gao_200602.php February 2006]. The September issue specifically says it starts in that issue, and the February issue says it ended in that one, so it's not simply the case of the website not including it for other issues. Additionally, every time it was serialized, it was given a different subtitle, and since there were only three, I assumed there to be three stories. I guess they serialized one by itself, and then two for the subsequent serials.--<span style=\"background:white;color:\"> +++$+++ I got the dates from MediaWork's website regarding old issues of Dengeki Comic Gao. When I looked through all the issues in 2005, I only found 3 that contained Blue Drop: [http://www.mediaworks.co.jp/magazine/backno/gao_200509.php September 2005], [http://www.mediaworks.co.jp/magazine/backno/gao_200512.php December 2005], and [http://www.mediaworks.co.jp/magazine/backno/gao_200602.php February 2006]. The September issue specifically says it starts in that issue, and the February issue says it ended in that one, so it's not simply the case of the website not including it for other issues. Additionally, every time it was serialized, it was given a different subtitle, and since there were only three, I assumed there to be three stories. I guess they serialized one by itself, and then two for the subsequent serials.--<span style="background:white;color:">[[User:Juhachi|'''<font color="0066cc">十</font>''']][[User talk:Juhachi|'''<font color="ff66cc">八</font>''']]</span> 08:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
11921 +++$+++ Juhachi +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11920 +++$+++ 11920 +++$+++ 2007-10-14 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.192377720E09 +++$+++ Wow, that changes everything. I'll have to expand on this in the manga section; turns out the first chapter was released in the February 2005 issue.--<span style=\"background:white;color:\"> +++$+++ :Wow, that changes everything. I'll have to expand on this in the manga section; turns out the first chapter was released in the February 2005 issue.--<span style="background:white;color:">[[User:Juhachi|'''<font color="0066cc">十</font>''']][[User talk:Juhachi|'''<font color="ff66cc">八</font>''']]</span> 09:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

536210 +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.164860760E09 +++$+++ IMO, yes, she needs to be blocked. She has just [[WP:STALK|stalked]] either [[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] and\/or [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]], both users she has had conflicts with, to {{article|Andrew Cohen}}, where she is now starting up with harassing edits and reverts. I'd block her if I was an admin. She is very clever at playing the victim, but she is actually going out of her way to antagonize certain other editors, and has been doing so since August. I'll take a look at your archives in a minute. - +++$+++ IMO, yes, she needs to be blocked. She has just [[WP:STALK|stalked]] either [[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] and/or [[User:Ekajati|Ekajati]], both users she has had conflicts with, to {{article|Andrew Cohen}}, where she is now starting up with harassing edits and reverts. I'd block her if I was an admin. She is very clever at playing the victim, but she is actually going out of her way to antagonize certain other editors, and has been doing so since August. I'll take a look at your archives in a minute. -[[User:999|999]] ([[User_talk:999|Talk]]) 20:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
536211 +++$+++ TheOtherBob +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536210 +++$+++ 536210 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.164860160E09 +++$+++ Geo - I've monitored this mediation for the past few days, and have some concerns.  I'm not at all clear what your role is in this issue at this point.  I understand that you were the former mediator for this matter, but were asked to recuse.  Thank you for your service on that - and for agreeing to step away when it was clear that you wouldn't be able to help.  Having stepped away, though, I'd suggest to you that it's not a good idea for you to continue to communicate with the parties regarding the dispute.  In particular, it's very bad form for you to contact one of the parties and request their comment on whether another party should be blocked.  At this point, if you believe that further action should be taken, it would be my suggestion that you reach out to an administrator or [[WP:AN\/I]], request that they review the situation independently, and then step out of it.  In any case, the participants in the mediation are emphatically not the appropriate people to ask to review each others' actions.  If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me - and thanks again for your service.  Thanks. -- +++$+++ :Geo - I've monitored this mediation for the past few days, and have some concerns.  I'm not at all clear what your role is in this issue at this point.  I understand that you were the former mediator for this matter, but were asked to recuse.  Thank you for your service on that - and for agreeing to step away when it was clear that you wouldn't be able to help.  Having stepped away, though, I'd suggest to you that it's not a good idea for you to continue to communicate with the parties regarding the dispute.  In particular, it's very bad form for you to contact one of the parties and request their comment on whether another party should be blocked.  At this point, if you believe that further action should be taken, it would be my suggestion that you reach out to an administrator or [[WP:AN/I]], request that they review the situation independently, and then step out of it.  In any case, the participants in the mediation are emphatically not the appropriate people to ask to review each others' actions.  If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me - and thanks again for your service.  Thanks. --[[User:TheOtherBob|TheOtherBob]] 20:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
536212 +++$+++  +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536210 +++$+++ 536210 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Would you be kind enough to look in my talk archives, 6 and 7, and tell me if Matisse's comments (to me)are rational? Geo. 18:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :Would you be kind enough to look in my talk archives, 6 and 7, and tell me if Matisse's comments (to me)are rational? Geo. 18:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

11924 +++$+++ Juhachi +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-14 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.200298320E09 +++$+++ It seems you have taken the right step to take it to [[WP:CFD]] since I would have done the same thing. Just revert all the articles that the user placed the cat on on the basis of redundany with [[:Category:Yuri]].--<span style=\"background:white;color:\"> +++$+++ It seems you have taken the right step to take it to [[WP:CFD]] since I would have done the same thing. Just revert all the articles that the user placed the cat on on the basis of redundany with [[:Category:Yuri]].--<span style="background:white;color:">[[User:Juhachi|'''<font color="0066cc">十</font>''']][[User talk:Juhachi|'''<font color="ff66cc">八</font>''']]</span> 00:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
11925 +++$+++ Juhachi +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11924 +++$+++ 11924 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.200301080E09 +++$+++ There, it's all done; I've reverted all of the 150+ articles that had the categories.--<span style=\"background:white;color:\"> +++$+++ :There, it's all done; I've reverted all of the 150+ articles that had the categories.--<span style="background:white;color:">[[User:Juhachi|'''<font color="0066cc">十</font>''']][[User talk:Juhachi|'''<font color="ff66cc">八</font>''']]</span> 00:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

274070 +++$+++ Brendan.lloyd +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.189781640E09 +++$+++ What would signify consensus in your view? Also, can you please rephrase your above criticism in terms of Wikipedia policy? Saying something is \"dodgy\" is unhelpful and POV. If the issue is style, why not improve the wording rather than delete the pertinent fact? --''' +++$+++ What would signify consensus in your view? Also, can you please rephrase your above criticism in terms of Wikipedia policy? Saying something is "dodgy" is unhelpful and POV. If the issue is style, why not improve the wording rather than delete the pertinent fact? --'''[[User:Brendan.lloyd|Brendan Lloyd]]''' <span style="font-size:80%">[ [[Special:Contributions/Brendan.lloyd|contribs]] ]</span> 07:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
274071 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274070 +++$+++ 274070 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.189781940E09 +++$+++ Brendan, consensus does not exist. If it existed, you wouldn't continually be reverted by different people. I think you need to read the [[WP:CON|consensus]] policy. Please take your further comments regarding the JH article to the article's talk page. I do not wish my talk page to turn into a defacto JH talk page. If you insist on continuing to post here, I will start deleting your comments. Thankyou. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 07:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC) PS As for dodgy, try reading BLP and NPOV. ''' +++$+++ :Brendan, consensus does not exist. If it existed, you wouldn't continually be reverted by different people. I think you need to read the [[WP:CON|consensus]] policy. Please take your further comments regarding the JH article to the article's talk page. I do not wish my talk page to turn into a defacto JH talk page. If you insist on continuing to post here, I will start deleting your comments. Thankyou. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 07:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC) PS As for dodgy, try reading BLP and NPOV. '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 07:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

89369 +++$+++ Finetooth +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-10 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.289378520E09 +++$+++ If I were reviewing the article at GAN or FAC, I would not question a ref either to the cover of the score or to the colour wheel. I don't see either as significantly different from using a map as a reference, for example. They all require more interpretation that plain prose text, but I think that's fine. A claim of \"deep violet-blue\" probably won't lead to an argument. (I hope I have answered the right question.) By the way, I like the addition of the names, ''Himmelfahrt'' and so on, to the heads.  +++$+++ If I were reviewing the article at GAN or FAC, I would not question a ref either to the cover of the score or to the colour wheel. I don't see either as significantly different from using a map as a reference, for example. They all require more interpretation that plain prose text, but I think that's fine. A claim of "deep violet-blue" probably won't lead to an argument. (I hope I have answered the right question.) By the way, I like the addition of the names, ''Himmelfahrt'' and so on, to the heads. [[User:Finetooth|Finetooth]] ([[User talk:Finetooth|talk]]) 00:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
89370 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89369 +++$+++ 89369 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.289380440E09 +++$+++ Thank you, that puts my mind at ease. I shall add the scores to the ref list and cite them for this purpose. To add a belt to the braces, I think I shall also cite the colour wheel. And thanks also for endorsing my decision to add the names to the headers.\u2014 +++$+++ :Thank you, that puts my mind at ease. I shall add the scores to the ref list and cite them for this purpose. To add a belt to the braces, I think I shall also cite the colour wheel. And thanks also for endorsing my decision to add the names to the headers.—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 01:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

274072 +++$+++ Someone is bored at work +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.189786260E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Sarah. You're a star!  +++$+++ Thank you, Sarah. You're a star! [[User:Someone is bored at work|Someone is bored at work]] 09:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
274073 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274072 +++$+++ 274072 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.189786380E09 +++$+++ Heh, no worries. I noticed when I was posting messages to them that Secretlondon had username blocked at least one of them as well. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Heh, no worries. I noticed when I was posting messages to them that Secretlondon had username blocked at least one of them as well. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]]''' 09:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

11930 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-08 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.202520660E09 +++$+++ Could you see the message I left for Masamage [[User talk:Masamage#Sailor Moon categories|here]]? I hope it makes sense. And I want to solve this ASAP because I don't think it requires another long discussion.  +++$+++ Could you see the message I left for Masamage [[User talk:Masamage#Sailor Moon categories|here]]? I hope it makes sense. And I want to solve this ASAP because I don't think it requires another long discussion. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 17:31, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
11931 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11930 +++$+++ 11930 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.202610720E09 +++$+++ I was hoping I could hear your thoughts on Masamage's talk page; now it seems another problem has arisen.  +++$+++ :I was hoping I could hear your thoughts on Masamage's talk page; now it seems another problem has arisen. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 18:32, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
11932 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11930 +++$+++ 11931 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.202633100E09 +++$+++ Excellent! Go ahead and place it.  +++$+++ ::Excellent! Go ahead and place it. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 00:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
11933 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11930 +++$+++ 11932 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.202635080E09 +++$+++ Um, do you plan to remove the category from any articles that don't follow the criteria? It's an unholy mess now.  +++$+++ :::Um, do you plan to remove the category from any articles that don't follow the criteria? It's an unholy mess now. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 01:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
11934 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11930 +++$+++ 11933 +++$+++ 2008-02-11 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.202784300E09 +++$+++ Did you see my message above?  +++$+++ ::::Did you see my message above? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 18:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
11935 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11930 +++$+++ 11934 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.202990700E09 +++$+++ Is there a reason why you're ignoring me?  +++$+++ :::::Is there a reason why you're ignoring me? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 04:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
11936 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11930 +++$+++ 11935 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.202994900E09 +++$+++ I was worried about you. Seemed strange that you didn't choose to reply. BTW, you're a guy right? Masamage and I were referring to you as such.  +++$+++ ::::::I was worried about you. Seemed strange that you didn't choose to reply. BTW, you're a guy right? Masamage and I were referring to you as such. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 05:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

536221 +++$+++ Kathryn_NicDhàna +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-30 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.164952500E09 +++$+++ Hello, Geo.  You wrote in your response above, about the confusion over your signature, \"which anyone can tell by the diffs I did not do.\"  New users do not know to look at diffs.  I am not a new user, and I found your signature confusing.  It made you difficult to identify and contact, and I asked you to change it.  From what I can see on your talk pages, you've been asked four times now to change your signature, by four different editors.  I suggest you take this into consideration.  Thanks. -- +++$+++ Hello, Geo.  You wrote in your response above, about the confusion over your signature, "which anyone can tell by the diffs I did not do."  New users do not know to look at diffs.  I am not a new user, and I found your signature confusing.  It made you difficult to identify and contact, and I asked you to change it.  From what I can see on your talk pages, you've been asked four times now to change your signature, by four different editors.  I suggest you take this into consideration.  Thanks. --[[User:Kathryn NicDhàna|Kathryn NicDhàna]] [[User_talk:Kathryn NicDhàna|♫]]<font color="navy">♦</font>[[Special:Contributions/Kathryn_NicDhàna|♫]] 21:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
536222 +++$+++ 999 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536221 +++$+++ 536221 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.164960780E09 +++$+++ Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. Keep your sig as it is if you wish. It is fine with me. - +++$+++ :Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. Keep your sig as it is if you wish. It is fine with me. -[[User:999|999]] ([[User_talk:999|Talk]]) 00:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

264133 +++$+++ Hoponpop69 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264133 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-11 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.181562240E09 +++$+++ Hi I noticed you had question the notability of the article [[Gossamer (band)]] back in April. I think you may want to put a deletion tag on the article as it still does not assert notability. +++$+++ Hi I noticed you had question the notability of the article [[Gossamer (band)]] back in April. I think you may want to put a deletion tag on the article as it still does not assert notability.[[User:Hoponpop69|Hoponpop69]] 04:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
264134 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264133 +++$+++ 264133 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.181974320E09 +++$+++ que?  +++$+++ :que? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

274082 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.190248740E09 +++$+++ An image issue (I don't speak images); [[:Image:Touretts.jpg]] was added to [[Tourette syndrome]] in what looked like an attempt to say the person in the image had TS, probably a jab.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tourette_syndrome&diff=158988737&oldid=158847332]  I have no idea what to do with this image.   +++$+++ An image issue (I don't speak images); [[:Image:Touretts.jpg]] was added to [[Tourette syndrome]] in what looked like an attempt to say the person in the image had TS, probably a jab.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tourette_syndrome&diff=158988737&oldid=158847332]  I have no idea what to do with this image.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:39, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274083 +++$+++ Timotab +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274082 +++$+++ 274082 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.190250240E09 +++$+++ (Timothy butts in) The image itself is not offensive, but as it (a) has no licensing information and (b) is orphaned (ie, has no pages linking to it), it will disappear.  Don't worry about it.&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ :(Timothy butts in) The image itself is not offensive, but as it (a) has no licensing information and (b) is orphaned (ie, has no pages linking to it), it will disappear.  Don't worry about it.&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Timotab|Timotab]] [[User_talk:Timotab|<sup>Timothy (not Tim </sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Timotab|<sup>dagnabbit!)</sup>]] 18:04, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274084 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274082 +++$+++ 274083 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.190263440E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Timothy; these teenage pages are *so* much work.  Sarah, disappointed to tell you AnnieTigerChucky still doesn't understand.  I just reverted [[Michael Wolff]]\u2014the inclusion of a large chunk of copyvio text from the [[Tourette Syndrome Association]] and the removal of cited text.  I'm afraid ATC just doesn't understand Wiki yet, and if she won't talk to people, I don't know how she can be mentored.   +++$+++ ::Thanks, Timothy; these teenage pages are *so* much work.  Sarah, disappointed to tell you AnnieTigerChucky still doesn't understand.  I just reverted [[Michael Wolff]]—the inclusion of a large chunk of copyvio text from the [[Tourette Syndrome Association]] and the removal of cited text.  I'm afraid ATC just doesn't understand Wiki yet, and if she won't talk to people, I don't know how she can be mentored.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:44, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274085 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274082 +++$+++ 274084 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.190263740E09 +++$+++ Ack, still another one -- she created [[The Tic Code]] as a copyvio from IMDb.   +++$+++ :::Ack, still another one -- she created [[The Tic Code]] as a copyvio from IMDb.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274086 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274082 +++$+++ 274085 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.190280060E09 +++$+++ Ugh. I don't know what to do about ATC. She probably needs to be blocked again. I told her the other day that if she posted material copied from other websites again I would block her for a week, so if she's come back and done just that a couple of days after her block expired, I suppose I have to block her...I just feel very reluctant about blocking people who appear to be clueless rather than malicious. But at the same time, letting this go on is not fair on the people who are having to waste their time following her around cleaning up after her. At least she responded to one of your messages; that's a step in the right direction at least. By the way, I deleted [[:Image:Touretts.jpg]]. Thanks Sandy,  +++$+++ ::::Ugh. I don't know what to do about ATC. She probably needs to be blocked again. I told her the other day that if she posted material copied from other websites again I would block her for a week, so if she's come back and done just that a couple of days after her block expired, I suppose I have to block her...I just feel very reluctant about blocking people who appear to be clueless rather than malicious. But at the same time, letting this go on is not fair on the people who are having to waste their time following her around cleaning up after her. At least she responded to one of your messages; that's a step in the right direction at least. By the way, I deleted [[:Image:Touretts.jpg]]. Thanks Sandy, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
274087 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274082 +++$+++ 274086 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.190280360E09 +++$+++ Yes, tough situation; two steps forward, one backward (two blatant copyvios, but finally responding on talk).  It's frustrating, but I share your reluctance because it doesn't seem intentional.   +++$+++ :::::Yes, tough situation; two steps forward, one backward (two blatant copyvios, but finally responding on talk).  It's frustrating, but I share your reluctance because it doesn't seem intentional.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:26, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
274088 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274082 +++$+++ 274087 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.190285460E09 +++$+++ Well, I've blocked her for a week and I deleted another copyright image she uploaded (it's now been deleted three times by two different admins). If she responds to me and gives an undertaking that she will stop copying material from elsewhere and I have a sense that she understands what we're telling her, I would be willing to reduce it to 3-4 days. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::::Well, I've blocked her for a week and I deleted another copyright image she uploaded (it's now been deleted three times by two different admins). If she responds to me and gives an undertaking that she will stop copying material from elsewhere and I have a sense that she understands what we're telling her, I would be willing to reduce it to 3-4 days. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

11939 +++$+++ Malkinann +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11939 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-03 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.204572660E09 +++$+++ Please accept this lily as a token of my appreciation for the rewrite you've done on the [[Yuri (term)|Yuri]] article.  Can some of the work done there also be used to improve the [[Class S (genre)|Class S]] article? - +++$+++ Please accept this lily as a token of my appreciation for the rewrite you've done on the [[Yuri (term)|Yuri]] article.  Can some of the work done there also be used to improve the [[Class S (genre)|Class S]] article? -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 11:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
11940 +++$+++ Malkinann +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11939 +++$+++ 11939 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.204744440E09 +++$+++ Does [http:\/\/d.hatena.ne.jp\/kaien\/20060828\/p1 this page] state that such-and-such a scholar thinks that Marimite is Class S? - +++$+++ :Does [http://d.hatena.ne.jp/kaien/20060828/p1 this page] state that such-and-such a scholar thinks that Marimite is Class S? -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 11:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

11941 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11941 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-08 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.204983660E09 +++$+++ After reading [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lupin_III&curid=285203&diff=196703028&oldid=196699717 this], I realized that the remaining images do appear to serve a purpose. Guess I should have taken a better look, sorry about that. So what's up? I was expecting a reply [[#Been about two weeks...|here]] and at the last query above that section.  +++$+++ After reading [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lupin_III&curid=285203&diff=196703028&oldid=196699717 this], I realized that the remaining images do appear to serve a purpose. Guess I should have taken a better look, sorry about that. So what's up? I was expecting a reply [[#Been about two weeks...|here]] and at the last query above that section. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 05:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
11942 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11941 +++$+++ 11941 +++$+++ 2008-03-08 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.204984680E09 +++$+++ Thank you! You have no idea how much this means to me. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thank you! You have no idea how much this means to me. Regards, [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 05:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
11943 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11941 +++$+++ 11942 +++$+++ 2008-03-08 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.205030400E09 +++$+++ Can you make clear that the introduction by year categories are correctly placed in those articles you nailed, respectively? See the ones at the bottom of [[Lupin III|''Lupin III'' (manga)]] and [[Lupin III (anime)|''Lupin III'' (anime)]] as examples. If the article is about the anime and manga, then the year categories should be something like the ones in ''[[Cutie Honey]]'' or ''[[Rurouni Kenshin]]'' (careful, some of these may be parent cats of each other and should be looked at). Does this make sense? Also, if you happen to see a page that refers only to the franchise, then the category should be like the one at ''[[Hellsing]]''.  +++$+++ ::Can you make clear that the introduction by year categories are correctly placed in those articles you nailed, respectively? See the ones at the bottom of [[Lupin III|''Lupin III'' (manga)]] and [[Lupin III (anime)|''Lupin III'' (anime)]] as examples. If the article is about the anime and manga, then the year categories should be something like the ones in ''[[Cutie Honey]]'' or ''[[Rurouni Kenshin]]'' (careful, some of these may be parent cats of each other and should be looked at). Does this make sense? Also, if you happen to see a page that refers only to the franchise, then the category should be like the one at ''[[Hellsing]]''. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 18:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
11944 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11941 +++$+++ 11943 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.206078780E09 +++$+++ Is [[:Category:Japanese television series]] clean now?  +++$+++ :::Is [[:Category:Japanese television series]] clean now? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 22:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

501123 +++$+++ Struway2 +++$+++ Mattythewhite +++$+++ 501123 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-07 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.254943740E09 +++$+++ Hello. You added a middle name to [[Dan Preston]], sourced to FindMyPast's search page. I searched for a Daniel Preston in September 1991, there were none, so added October, not unlikely that his birth wasn't registered till the October, and got two results. The one you added, registered in Birmingham, and a Daniel George registered in Rotherham. Without paying, there was no way I could tell which was the right actual date of birth. Do you have a subscription that lets you see full details, to confirm that Daniel Sean is the right one? cheers,  +++$+++ Hello. You added a middle name to [[Dan Preston]], sourced to FindMyPast's search page. I searched for a Daniel Preston in September 1991, there were none, so added October, not unlikely that his birth wasn't registered till the October, and got two results. The one you added, registered in Birmingham, and a Daniel George registered in Rotherham. Without paying, there was no way I could tell which was the right actual date of birth. Do you have a subscription that lets you see full details, to confirm that Daniel Sean is the right one? cheers, [[User:Struway2|Struway2]] ([[User talk:Struway2|talk]]) 12:29, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
501124 +++$+++ Struway2 +++$+++ Mattythewhite +++$+++ 501123 +++$+++ 501123 +++$+++ 2009-10-07 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.254962700E09 +++$+++ A perfectly reasonable assumption, in my opinion, but on [[WP:BLP|BLPs]] we ought to be picky. I'll take it out till a source turns up for him being born in Birmingham, as opposed to the several that just say he was raised there. Soon as one does, it'll go straight back in. cheers,  +++$+++ :A perfectly reasonable assumption, in my opinion, but on [[WP:BLP|BLPs]] we ought to be picky. I'll take it out till a source turns up for him being born in Birmingham, as opposed to the several that just say he was raised there. Soon as one does, it'll go straight back in. cheers, [[User:Struway2|Struway2]] ([[User talk:Struway2|talk]]) 17:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

569969 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-02 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.183394280E09 +++$+++ Thanks.-- +++$+++ Thanks.--[[User:PericlesofAthens|PericlesofAthens]] 09:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
569970 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569969 +++$+++ 569969 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.183395900E09 +++$+++ Nevermind! Getting annoyed with the situation, I searched around on Google and found the exact image that was used. It is public domain, taken from the National Museum in Taipei. Everything's good.-- +++$+++ :Nevermind! Getting annoyed with the situation, I searched around on Google and found the exact image that was used. It is public domain, taken from the National Museum in Taipei. Everything's good.--[[User:PericlesofAthens|PericlesofAthens]] 10:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

274089 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274089 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-18 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.190119920E09 +++$+++ I lodged a request for mediation for those who wish to discuss a compromise for the article. The page link is here ->[[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation\/John Howard]]. People can say whether they \"agree\" or \"disagree\" to a mediation process. -- +++$+++ I lodged a request for mediation for those who wish to discuss a compromise for the article. The page link is here ->[[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/John Howard]]. People can say whether they "agree" or "disagree" to a mediation process. --[[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 05:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
274090 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274089 +++$+++ 274089 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.190121060E09 +++$+++ Thanks but I think I've already made my opinion clear on the talk page. I am willing to try mediation at a later point but not right now. I think it would be best if there was a chance for the air to clear and for people to have a break before discussing it again given that we appear to have been at an impasse for several weeks.  +++$+++ :Thanks but I think I've already made my opinion clear on the talk page. I am willing to try mediation at a later point but not right now. I think it would be best if there was a chance for the air to clear and for people to have a break before discussing it again given that we appear to have been at an impasse for several weeks. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:11, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
274091 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274089 +++$+++ 274090 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.190143080E09 +++$+++ Just to clear up an issue, I submitted the RfM at 13:52, 16 September 2007. You let your views be known on the talk page on 00:53, 18 September 2007, almost 3 days later. I didn't have prior knowledge of anyone's response. I sent the personal message alerting you to the RfM because it seemed better to \"agree\" or \"disagree\" on the RfM page than the talk page, and the J.H discussion was continuing (and still is) on the talk page, which could have also been moved to the RfM. Cheers-- +++$+++ ::Just to clear up an issue, I submitted the RfM at 13:52, 16 September 2007. You let your views be known on the talk page on 00:53, 18 September 2007, almost 3 days later. I didn't have prior knowledge of anyone's response. I sent the personal message alerting you to the RfM because it seemed better to "agree" or "disagree" on the RfM page than the talk page, and the J.H discussion was continuing (and still is) on the talk page, which could have also been moved to the RfM. Cheers--[[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 12:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
274092 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274089 +++$+++ 274090 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.190143920E09 +++$+++ re: Village Pump: I would have gladly supplied specific info, but I wasn't sure if it was appropriate on village pump. I was hesitant because I thought that supplying particular usernames on the public forum may not be appropriate. Besides, that incident was over and done with, but the issue of reference deletion (for future cases) was still on my mind. I'd noticed it on a second article, so I raised the issue.-- +++$+++ ::re: Village Pump: I would have gladly supplied specific info, but I wasn't sure if it was appropriate on village pump. I was hesitant because I thought that supplying particular usernames on the public forum may not be appropriate. Besides, that incident was over and done with, but the issue of reference deletion (for future cases) was still on my mind. I'd noticed it on a second article, so I raised the issue.--[[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 12:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

11946 +++$+++ Malkinann +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11946 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-01 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.207068660E09 +++$+++ Valenti, Kristy L. [http:\/\/www.tcj.com\/269\/e_yaoi.html \"Stop, My Butt Hurts!\" - The Yaoi Invasion] ''[[The Comics Journal]]'' issue 269, 2005 says that female-created yuri isn't as popular amongst females as yaoi is, because of male-targetted yuri-as-fanservice. Either that male-targetted yuri puts them off, or they can't find the female-created stuff out there.- +++$+++ Valenti, Kristy L. [http://www.tcj.com/269/e_yaoi.html "Stop, My Butt Hurts!" - The Yaoi Invasion] ''[[The Comics Journal]]'' issue 269, 2005 says that female-created yuri isn't as popular amongst females as yaoi is, because of male-targetted yuri-as-fanservice. Either that male-targetted yuri puts them off, or they can't find the female-created stuff out there.-[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 09:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
11947 +++$+++ Malkinann +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11946 +++$+++ 11946 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.207317000E09 +++$+++ Well, that's a point isn't it?  That if we can find a source saying that Marimite has led the charge back to seeing shoujo and josei yuri as being refound daughters of Esu, then we can say \"Up until Marimite, yuri was seen like this, but post-Marimite, yuri has become more like this\".  Although I've noticed that you've only got a source saying (roughly) that Marimite is wildly, bizarrely, popular amongst males. As a side note, I've found [http:\/\/www.upress.umn.edu\/Books\/L\/lunning_mechademia1.html an article comparing Marimite to Azumanga Daioh], and I've put in a request for it with [[User:Nihonjoe]].  Friedman says that in the interviews she's gotten, the assumption is becoming that yuri is by-women-for-women, (as can be seen most tellingly in the introduction to the Hinamatsuri interview).  She also notes that paradoxically, while the first yuri magazine was for females, it went bust (I think she says its successor is going badly too??) and that male-oriented moe yuri is becoming more and more popular (as in the 'sister magazine' which is male-oriented).  So it's difficult to tell.  Welker in his book chapter (2001\/2002ish) also says that 70s female mangaka who created shoujo suffered from \"lesbian panic\"  (so, they wouldn't show yuri, or else they would give them BAD END), for fear that their work would be too confronting for their readers, who would suffer their own \"lesbian panic\" and not buy the mag (and thus the series becomes uneconomic for the mangaka).  Valenti's article is primarily about yaoi, and only briefly glosses over yuri, so that could be where the flaws lie. I'm really looking forward to whatever else you can rustle up about yuri, btw. :) - +++$+++ :Well, that's a point isn't it?  That if we can find a source saying that Marimite has led the charge back to seeing shoujo and josei yuri as being refound daughters of Esu, then we can say "Up until Marimite, yuri was seen like this, but post-Marimite, yuri has become more like this".  Although I've noticed that you've only got a source saying (roughly) that Marimite is wildly, bizarrely, popular amongst males. As a side note, I've found [http://www.upress.umn.edu/Books/L/lunning_mechademia1.html an article comparing Marimite to Azumanga Daioh], and I've put in a request for it with [[User:Nihonjoe]].  Friedman says that in the interviews she's gotten, the assumption is becoming that yuri is by-women-for-women, (as can be seen most tellingly in the introduction to the Hinamatsuri interview).  She also notes that paradoxically, while the first yuri magazine was for females, it went bust (I think she says its successor is going badly too??) and that male-oriented moe yuri is becoming more and more popular (as in the 'sister magazine' which is male-oriented).  So it's difficult to tell.  Welker in his book chapter (2001/2002ish) also says that 70s female mangaka who created shoujo suffered from "lesbian panic"  (so, they wouldn't show yuri, or else they would give them BAD END), for fear that their work would be too confronting for their readers, who would suffer their own "lesbian panic" and not buy the mag (and thus the series becomes uneconomic for the mangaka).  Valenti's article is primarily about yaoi, and only briefly glosses over yuri, so that could be where the flaws lie. I'm really looking forward to whatever else you can rustle up about yuri, btw. :) -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 06:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
11948 +++$+++ Malkinann +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11946 +++$+++ 11947 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 08:50:00 +++$+++ 1.207324200E09 +++$+++ The \"Hinamatsuri\" interview was the About.com interview - it was released on Hinamatsuri (cos what's better to talk about on Girls' Day than girls who like girls? ;) ).  I'm sure she's mentioned it before, but I can't find it for the life of me!  As for the rise of moe, I think Friedman mentioned it in one of her reviews of Comic Yuri Hime S. The quote by the editor is really interesting and I hope it makes it into the next draft.  :) I suspect it could be due to issues of disposable income???- +++$+++ ::The "Hinamatsuri" interview was the About.com interview - it was released on Hinamatsuri (cos what's better to talk about on Girls' Day than girls who like girls? ;) ).  I'm sure she's mentioned it before, but I can't find it for the life of me!  As for the rise of moe, I think Friedman mentioned it in one of her reviews of Comic Yuri Hime S. The quote by the editor is really interesting and I hope it makes it into the next draft.  :) I suspect it could be due to issues of disposable income???-[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 08:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

274093 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274093 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-18 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.190144700E09 +++$+++ doubts about Brendan, but I have no reason to think that you are acting in bad faith, so I withdraw that comment as well. I really think that this copra matter should be set aside for a while to give the chance for the air to clear and for people to digest each other's comments; I really don't think continuing with this dispute at the current time is going to have a favourable outcome and it will most likely spread bad feelings to other pages, as it seems to be doing at David Hicks. I strongly encourage you to agree to take a break from the copra matter and look at other issues and even other articles because there are lots of articles that really should be worked on so we have a good selection of political articles for people to read in the lead up to the election.  +++$+++ doubts about Brendan, but I have no reason to think that you are acting in bad faith, so I withdraw that comment as well. I really think that this copra matter should be set aside for a while to give the chance for the air to clear and for people to digest each other's comments; I really don't think continuing with this dispute at the current time is going to have a favourable outcome and it will most likely spread bad feelings to other pages, as it seems to be doing at David Hicks. I strongly encourage you to agree to take a break from the copra matter and look at other issues and even other articles because there are lots of articles that really should be worked on so we have a good selection of political articles for people to read in the lead up to the election. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
274094 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274093 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.190155020E09 +++$+++ Hello Sarah. My conversation with Vassyana was not a formal submission to any mediation group. It was one-to-one conversation, so it would have been worded differently if it was any official thing. I don't expect Vassyana will be arbitrating on the subject, so I wasn't trying to influence her one way or another. I'm surprised how quickly you follow my edits. Do you manually refresh my contributions list, or can Wiki users install a bot to alert them? Also, you seem to think Brendan and I are POV editors, whatever that is. But everyone always thinks those on the opposing side of a content dispute are POV editors. When I read the Wiki rules, the copra plantation issue fits within those rules perfectly, and is not POV pushing. Sarah, I don't want to have a personal dispute with you, over article content. I like a lot of your work. I like a lot of the things you stand for. We disagree on the copra information. We probably won't agree on that one. In the next week or so I'll try to present a more persuasive argument for why copra fits into Wiki rules, and post it on the talk page. Cheers, -- +++$+++ ::::Hello Sarah. My conversation with Vassyana was not a formal submission to any mediation group. It was one-to-one conversation, so it would have been worded differently if it was any official thing. I don't expect Vassyana will be arbitrating on the subject, so I wasn't trying to influence her one way or another. I'm surprised how quickly you follow my edits. Do you manually refresh my contributions list, or can Wiki users install a bot to alert them? Also, you seem to think Brendan and I are POV editors, whatever that is. But everyone always thinks those on the opposing side of a content dispute are POV editors. When I read the Wiki rules, the copra plantation issue fits within those rules perfectly, and is not POV pushing. Sarah, I don't want to have a personal dispute with you, over article content. I like a lot of your work. I like a lot of the things you stand for. We disagree on the copra information. We probably won't agree on that one. In the next week or so I'll try to present a more persuasive argument for why copra fits into Wiki rules, and post it on the talk page. Cheers, --[[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 15:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

274095 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274095 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-18 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.190162640E09 +++$+++ I don't have anything against you personally and I found you quite reasonable to edit with on the Lyall Howard article, but you concern me very much as you seem to be completely singularly focused to the point of being obsessed with getting your own way. Meanwhile, you seem blinded to the fact that ignoring both pro- and anti-inclusion people when they tell you the same thing about having a break and editing something else for awhile, is only making the situation worse. If you do not have political motivations for editing, I don't understand the complete focus with regard to these edits and this article. Have you looked at your own contributions? You are looking like a [[WP:SPA|single purpose account]] as you very rarely edit outside this topic. Have a look at any of the other involved editors contributions and you will see how dramatically single purpose you and Brendan look; this would really go against both of you and likely result in at a minimum, a topic ban at both the Community Sanctions Noticeboard and arbitration. Please consider respecting everyone's wish that you give us a break and go and do something else on other unrelated articles for a little while.  +++$+++ I don't have anything against you personally and I found you quite reasonable to edit with on the Lyall Howard article, but you concern me very much as you seem to be completely singularly focused to the point of being obsessed with getting your own way. Meanwhile, you seem blinded to the fact that ignoring both pro- and anti-inclusion people when they tell you the same thing about having a break and editing something else for awhile, is only making the situation worse. If you do not have political motivations for editing, I don't understand the complete focus with regard to these edits and this article. Have you looked at your own contributions? You are looking like a [[WP:SPA|single purpose account]] as you very rarely edit outside this topic. Have a look at any of the other involved editors contributions and you will see how dramatically single purpose you and Brendan look; this would really go against both of you and likely result in at a minimum, a topic ban at both the Community Sanctions Noticeboard and arbitration. Please consider respecting everyone's wish that you give us a break and go and do something else on other unrelated articles for a little while. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 17:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
274096 +++$+++ Lester2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274095 +++$+++ 274095 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.190176860E09 +++$+++ You ask if I'm \"seriously arguing that this is consistent with WP:BLP\"? My answer: Absolutely. Let me quote WP:BLP: ''\"In the case of significant public figures... If an allegation or incident is notable, relevant, and well-documented by reliable published sources, it belongs in the article.\"''. But you mention Gnangarra's offer, so I'll go back and review what he said.-- +++$+++ :You ask if I'm "seriously arguing that this is consistent with WP:BLP"? My answer: Absolutely. Let me quote WP:BLP: ''"In the case of significant public figures... If an allegation or incident is notable, relevant, and well-documented by reliable published sources, it belongs in the article."''. But you mention Gnangarra's offer, so I'll go back and review what he said.--[[User:Lester2|Lester2]] 21:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

11952 +++$+++ Malkinann +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-06 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.207483080E09 +++$+++ I'd told you about the article before.  :(  Rather than bother Nihonjoe again, how would you propose that I transmit it to you? - +++$+++ I'd told you about the article before.  :(  Rather than bother Nihonjoe again, how would you propose that I transmit it to you? -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 04:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
11953 +++$+++ Malkinann +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11952 +++$+++ 11952 +++$+++ 2008-04-06 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.207485120E09 +++$+++ here you go - Please tell me when you've successfully received the article so I can delete the file. - +++$+++ : here you go - Please tell me when you've successfully received the article so I can delete the file. -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 05:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
11954 +++$+++ Malkinann +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11952 +++$+++ 11953 +++$+++ 2008-04-06 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.207488120E09 +++$+++ I've deleted it from the server. - +++$+++ ::I've deleted it from the server. -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 06:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

274097 +++$+++ Brendan.lloyd +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.190331000E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. Please consider my comments at [[Talk:John_Howard#Good_Faith_discussions_please]] and [[Talk:John_Howard#David_Marr_feedback]]. As a general practice in good faith, can you please also direct future comments specifically about my editorial style and character to my user talkpage? --''' +++$+++ Hi Sarah. Please consider my comments at [[Talk:John_Howard#Good_Faith_discussions_please]] and [[Talk:John_Howard#David_Marr_feedback]]. As a general practice in good faith, can you please also direct future comments specifically about my editorial style and character to my user talkpage? --'''[[User:Brendan.lloyd|Brendan Lloyd]]''' <span style="font-size:80%">[ [[Special:Contributions/Brendan.lloyd|contribs]] ]</span> 16:30, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
274098 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274097 +++$+++ 274097 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.190331480E09 +++$+++ Brendan, I have told you that I am not discussing this with you until a reasonable period of time has passed. Please respect this instead of trying to force me otherwise. Please also stop posting on my talk page. I was contacted privately by someone who knows you and I no longer have any reason at -all- to believe that you are editing here in good faith. You are a [[WP:SPA]] with an agenda. Please stop wasting my time and contain whatever you want to say about the article to the article's talk page.  +++$+++ :Brendan, I have told you that I am not discussing this with you until a reasonable period of time has passed. Please respect this instead of trying to force me otherwise. Please also stop posting on my talk page. I was contacted privately by someone who knows you and I no longer have any reason at -all- to believe that you are editing here in good faith. You are a [[WP:SPA]] with an agenda. Please stop wasting my time and contain whatever you want to say about the article to the article's talk page. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 16:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

11955 +++$+++ Doceirias +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-09 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.207795920E09 +++$+++ Why are you changing these to the publisher? And the publisher's old name? All books on Wikipedia are listed by the imprint they come out on, not the publisher that owns that imprint.  +++$+++ Why are you changing these to the publisher? And the publisher's old name? All books on Wikipedia are listed by the imprint they come out on, not the publisher that owns that imprint. [[User:Doceirias|Doceirias]] ([[User talk:Doceirias|talk]]) 19:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
11956 +++$+++ Doceirias +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11955 +++$+++ 11955 +++$+++ 2008-04-10 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.207819320E09 +++$+++ Yeah, looks like a misunderstanding on my part.  +++$+++ :Yeah, looks like a misunderstanding on my part. [[User:Doceirias|Doceirias]] ([[User talk:Doceirias|talk]]) 02:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

274100 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.190192100E09 +++$+++ Congratulations, [[User:Sarah|Sarah]], on this date, September 19, 2007, you have been an administrator for an entire year! :)  +++$+++ Congratulations, [[User:Sarah|Sarah]], on this date, September 19, 2007, you have been an administrator for an entire year! :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 01:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274101 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274100 +++$+++ 274100 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.190201160E09 +++$+++ Hey thanks, Acalamari. I knew the year was up sometime this month but I had no idea it was today. I hope everything is good with you. Cheers! :)  +++$+++ :Hey thanks, Acalamari. I knew the year was up sometime this month but I had no idea it was today. I hope everything is good with you. Cheers! :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274102 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274100 +++$+++ 274101 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.190202360E09 +++$+++ Wow. Well done! Time flies when you're having fun, eh? ++ +++$+++ ::Wow. Well done! Time flies when you're having fun, eh? ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 04:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274103 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274100 +++$+++ 274102 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.190203620E09 +++$+++ Thanks Lar. :) By the way, on your talk page I did a mean a 'crat on EN. May as well go for a full set of flags! :)  +++$+++ :::Thanks Lar. :) By the way, on your talk page I did a mean a 'crat on EN. May as well go for a full set of flags! :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274104 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274100 +++$+++ 274103 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.190203860E09 +++$+++ I'd have to think REALLY hard about that one, I reckon. But thanks for the vote of confidence. ++ +++$+++ ::::I'd have to think REALLY hard about that one, I reckon. But thanks for the vote of confidence. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 05:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

89374 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-18 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.290100980E09 +++$+++ Thank you for [[In Freundschaft]]! (I don't understand the footnotes tag.) It was played in [http:\/\/www.arbc.de\/Waterhouse\/konzerte.htm#2009WW Berlin], in memoriam [[William Waterhouse (bassoonist)|William Waterhouse]], because he admired it (s. Programm). In Freundschaft, -- +++$+++ Thank you for [[In Freundschaft]]! (I don't understand the footnotes tag.) It was played in [http://www.arbc.de/Waterhouse/konzerte.htm#2009WW Berlin], in memoriam [[William Waterhouse (bassoonist)|William Waterhouse]], because he admired it (s. Programm). In Freundschaft, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:23, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
89375 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 2010-11-18 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.290129300E09 +++$+++ Ich freue mich, da\xdf es Ihnen gefallen hat! The footnotes tag was placed by a bot\u2014this happens every time I create an article, because the bots can't read. They look for certain templates and\u2014when they are absent\u2014clamp a banner on the article. I don't use templates (despite the claim that they make things easier for inexperienced editors, I find their syntax impenetrable, and their formats are usually seriously defective), consequently my articles always get this treatment. As it happens, I had just recently (29 October) heard ''In Freundschaft'' played in the bassoon version by Pascal Gallois. He was unable (or unwilling) to perform it from memory, but that didn't stop him from making all the prescribed movements, and what fabulous technique! (No teddy-bear costume  however!) I had been meaning to write that article for a long time now (''In Freundschaft'' is, after all, Stockhausen's second-most-popular composition with performers, after ''Tierkreis''), and Gallois's performance was the final spur I needed.\u2014 +++$+++ :Ich freue mich, daß es Ihnen gefallen hat! The footnotes tag was placed by a bot—this happens every time I create an article, because the bots can't read. They look for certain templates and—when they are absent—clamp a banner on the article. I don't use templates (despite the claim that they make things easier for inexperienced editors, I find their syntax impenetrable, and their formats are usually seriously defective), consequently my articles always get this treatment. As it happens, I had just recently (29 October) heard ''In Freundschaft'' played in the bassoon version by Pascal Gallois. He was unable (or unwilling) to perform it from memory, but that didn't stop him from making all the prescribed movements, and what fabulous technique! (No teddy-bear costume  however!) I had been meaning to write that article for a long time now (''In Freundschaft'' is, after all, Stockhausen's second-most-popular composition with performers, after ''Tierkreis''), and Gallois's performance was the final spur I needed.—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 17:15, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
89376 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 89375 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.296624300E09 +++$+++ Nachspiel: The article William Waterhouse was made a DAB - I think this is misleading all links from outside WP. Quite a [http:\/\/www.wigmore-hall.org.uk\/whats-on\/productions\/william-waterhouse-memorial-concert-27783?mini=calendar%2F2011-04 concert] in preparation for him in Wigmore Hall, but this time without Stockhausen, -- +++$+++ ::Nachspiel: The article William Waterhouse was made a DAB - I think this is misleading all links from outside WP. Quite a [http://www.wigmore-hall.org.uk/whats-on/productions/william-waterhouse-memorial-concert-27783?mini=calendar%2F2011-04 concert] in preparation for him in Wigmore Hall, but this time without Stockhausen, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 21:25, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
89377 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.296624780E09 +++$+++ Well, there are at least four of him. Think of how much more difficult it was when I created the article on [[David C. Johnson|David Johnson]], without at first knowing his middle initial!\u2014 +++$+++ :Well, there are at least four of him. Think of how much more difficult it was when I created the article on [[David C. Johnson|David Johnson]], without at first knowing his middle initial!—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 21:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
89378 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 89377 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.299529500E09 +++$+++ Thank you for [[Adieu]], taken to the bassoonist, -- +++$+++ ::Thank you for [[Adieu]], taken to the bassoonist, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 12:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
89379 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 2011-03-07 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.299555840E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. I was thinking of you and this conversation when I placed that link.\u2014 +++$+++ :You are very welcome. I was thinking of you and this conversation when I placed that link.—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 19:44, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
89380 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 89379 +++$+++ 2011-04-15 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.302878400E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the string trios, \"mine\" performed tomorrow by the bassoonists children, in Freundschaft, -- +++$+++ ::Thank you for the string trios, "mine" performed tomorrow by the bassoonists children, in Freundschaft, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
89381 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.304307000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your enlightening operas! - ''[[The Proud Bassoon]]'' program: \"In an exchange of emails following Bill's death in November 2007, Richard Moore asked Stockhausen whether he recalled working with Bill when recording ''Zeitmasse'' and ''Adieu''. Stockhausen replied: \"Not only in rehearsal, but also in many hours before and after rehearsals and recordings, and during our trips with the ensemble, I had the pleasure and privilege of sharing with William Waterhouse his rich cultural knowledge and enthusiasm. He was a musician as we all should be: excellent as a performer, open minded, curious, well educated, joyous, full of humour. I greet him in the beyond and hope to meet him again.\" Four days after sending this reply, Stockhausen himself passed away. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for your enlightening operas! - ''[[The Proud Bassoon]]'' program: "In an exchange of emails following Bill's death in November 2007, Richard Moore asked Stockhausen whether he recalled working with Bill when recording ''Zeitmasse'' and ''Adieu''. Stockhausen replied: "Not only in rehearsal, but also in many hours before and after rehearsals and recordings, and during our trips with the ensemble, I had the pleasure and privilege of sharing with William Waterhouse his rich cultural knowledge and enthusiasm. He was a musician as we all should be: excellent as a performer, open minded, curious, well educated, joyous, full of humour. I greet him in the beyond and hope to meet him again." Four days after sending this reply, Stockhausen himself passed away. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 20:30, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
89382 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 89381 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.304309280E09 +++$+++ You are welcome for the \"enlightening operas\", but they are Stockhausen's, not mine (I only wrote the articles about them)! That is a lovely tribute to William Waterhouse from Stockhausen, and I hope that they have met again in the beyond and are making joyous music together.\u2014 +++$+++ ::You are welcome for the "enlightening operas", but they are Stockhausen's, not mine (I only wrote the articles about them)! That is a lovely tribute to William Waterhouse from Stockhausen, and I hope that they have met again in the beyond and are making joyous music together.—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 21:08, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
89383 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 89374 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 09:16:00 +++$+++ 1.304352960E09 +++$+++ I take the full quote to the article now, noticing that it appears abbreviated in a review. (Until this was printed in the program, I thought it was too personal to be included in WP, - I knew it since 2007.) - Please excuse my sloppy language, Stockhausen's operas, of course, it was late ... A discussion about (also my) \"loose language\" is going on at [[Talk:Bach cantata]], of all places, -- +++$+++ :I take the full quote to the article now, noticing that it appears abbreviated in a review. (Until this was printed in the program, I thought it was too personal to be included in WP, - I knew it since 2007.) - Please excuse my sloppy language, Stockhausen's operas, of course, it was late ... A discussion about (also my) "loose language" is going on at [[Talk:Bach cantata]], of all places, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:16, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

536246 +++$+++ Natalya +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536246 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-03 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.167896220E09 +++$+++ Interesting question.  The Esperanza I joined for and the Esperanza it was for a while was a great and friendly place, and was a place that was acceptable to Wikipedia.  The Esperanza that we deleted was no longer that Esperanza, and it was not acceptable to Wikipedia.  Frankly, if we can't have a well-functioning and accepted Esperanza, perhaps no Esperanza is better than a poorly acting one. --  +++$+++ Interesting question.  The Esperanza I joined for and the Esperanza it was for a while was a great and friendly place, and was a place that was acceptable to Wikipedia.  The Esperanza that we deleted was no longer that Esperanza, and it was not acceptable to Wikipedia.  Frankly, if we can't have a well-functioning and accepted Esperanza, perhaps no Esperanza is better than a poorly acting one. -- [[User:Natalya|Nataly<font color="green">a</font>]] 23:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
536247 +++$+++ Natalya +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536246 +++$+++ 536246 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.167896580E09 +++$+++ The problem is that, unfortunately, I don't think it can become what it used to be, and we will just have to live with that. --  +++$+++ :The problem is that, unfortunately, I don't think it can become what it used to be, and we will just have to live with that. -- [[User:Natalya|Nataly<font color="green">a</font>]] 23:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

264137 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-18 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.182215940E09 +++$+++ Hello. I'm not sure from where you got your idea for formatting, but we don't have cast lists in tables like that. The general thinking is that tables should be avoided for simple lists. Actually, there shouldn't be a list at all: featured articles have Casting sections written in prose: see [[Halloween (1978 film)]] and [[Halloween II]] for examples of a mature cast section. Cheers.  +++$+++ Hello. I'm not sure from where you got your idea for formatting, but we don't have cast lists in tables like that. The general thinking is that tables should be avoided for simple lists. Actually, there shouldn't be a list at all: featured articles have Casting sections written in prose: see [[Halloween (1978 film)]] and [[Halloween II]] for examples of a mature cast section. Cheers. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
264138 +++$+++ RobNS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264137 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.182216900E09 +++$+++ A lot of work went into this by me, and even the slight colour coding in boxes is subtle. I realise it is in the eyes of the beholder, but I hope you will reconsider. Best wishes.-- +++$+++ ::A lot of work went into this by me, and even the slight colour coding in boxes is subtle. I realise it is in the eyes of the beholder, but I hope you will reconsider. Best wishes.--[[User:RobNS|<b><font color="green">''Rob''</font>]][[User talk:RobNS|<font color="blue">''NS''</font></b>]] 18:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
264139 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264137 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.182217140E09 +++$+++ I know it's disappointing when you've put time and effort into something, only to have it removed. I've been there. Consistency is important, though. The style guidelines for film articles are at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films\/Style guidelines]]. As I say, tables are to be avoided for simple lists, and colour is to be avoided for accessibility reasons.   +++$+++ :::I know it's disappointing when you've put time and effort into something, only to have it removed. I've been there. Consistency is important, though. The style guidelines for film articles are at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines]]. As I say, tables are to be avoided for simple lists, and colour is to be avoided for accessibility reasons.  [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
264140 +++$+++ RobNS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264137 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.182218700E09 +++$+++ Hey JPS, first of all, I have to (and want to) respect what you say because, well, you're an admin, and have surely worked hard to get there. I hope you will only remove the colours at this point from my tables, or you will have one very broken hearted Canadian over here. Can I at least make the colour headings a suggestion in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films\/Style guidelines]] page? I think it will be effective and, as I said before, it's very subtle, and uses very simple HTML colours (and yes, in Canada we say 'colour' not 'color' like the country below). Cheers best wishes.-- +++$+++ ::::Hey JPS, first of all, I have to (and want to) respect what you say because, well, you're an admin, and have surely worked hard to get there. I hope you will only remove the colours at this point from my tables, or you will have one very broken hearted Canadian over here. Can I at least make the colour headings a suggestion in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines]] page? I think it will be effective and, as I said before, it's very subtle, and uses very simple HTML colours (and yes, in Canada we say 'colour' not 'color' like the country below). Cheers best wishes.--[[User:RobNS|<b><font color="green">''Rob''</font>]][[User talk:RobNS|<font color="blue">''NS''</font></b>]] 19:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

274105 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.190204040E09 +++$+++ Well done Sarah. You should have campaigned for the extra vote....then you would have had the Australian record for RfA to yourself!! You've done very well. ''' +++$+++ Well done Sarah. You should have campaigned for the extra vote....then you would have had the Australian record for RfA to yourself!! You've done very well. '''[[User:Blnguyen|<font color="GoldenRod">Blnguyen</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:Blnguyen|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 05:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274106 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274105 +++$+++ 274105 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.190204460E09 +++$+++ Heh thanks, Blng. I don't know, I'm quite happy sharing the spot with you! It's just a shame about that darn Daniel Bryant who pushed us down the list. What a way to show gratitude for my nominating him! :)  +++$+++ :Heh thanks, Blng. I don't know, I'm quite happy sharing the spot with you! It's just a shame about that darn Daniel Bryant who pushed us down the list. What a way to show gratitude for my nominating him! :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274107 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274105 +++$+++ 274106 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.190392800E09 +++$+++ ''*flees*'' ''' +++$+++ ::''*flees*'' '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 09:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
274108 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274105 +++$+++ 274107 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.190408400E09 +++$+++ And here's the ungrateful trouble maker himself!;-D   +++$+++ :::And here's the ungrateful trouble maker himself!;-D  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
274109 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274105 +++$+++ 274105 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.190244420E09 +++$+++ Hello Sarah, you're welcome for the star! I'm glad you like it! I had a look at your RfA and old logs to remind myself when the anniversary was, and when I find out that the date was today, I made sure I would get something for you! :) Oh, and I'm fine, don't worry. :)  +++$+++ *Hello Sarah, you're welcome for the star! I'm glad you like it! I had a look at your RfA and old logs to remind myself when the anniversary was, and when I find out that the date was today, I made sure I would get something for you! :) Oh, and I'm fine, don't worry. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274110 +++$+++ Timotab +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274105 +++$+++ 274109 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.190244900E09 +++$+++ Yarrr, ye got made into a Cap'n on [[International Talk Like a Pirate Day]]?  Avast!  Those scurvy dogs better watch out when Cap'n Sarah makes them [[WP:BLOCK|walk the plank]] for their [[WP:VANDAL|pillagin']]! &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Yarrr, ye got made into a Cap'n on [[International Talk Like a Pirate Day]]?  Avast!  Those scurvy dogs better watch out when Cap'n Sarah makes them [[WP:BLOCK|walk the plank]] for their [[WP:VANDAL|pillagin']]! &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Timotab|Timotab]] [[User_talk:Timotab|<sup>Timothy (not Tim </sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Timotab|<sup>dagnabbit!)</sup>]] 16:35, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274111 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274105 +++$+++ 274110 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.190280480E09 +++$+++ Hehe, I actually had no clue that I became an admin on International Talk Like a Pirate Day. I'll remember to use that next time I have to rogue up! lol  +++$+++ :::Hehe, I actually had no clue that I became an admin on International Talk Like a Pirate Day. I'll remember to use that next time I have to rogue up! lol [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
274112 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274105 +++$+++ 274105 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 09:39:00 +++$+++ 1.190392740E09 +++$+++ Congrats Sarah, keep up the good work, and bad luck with the Hawks - next year, eh? :) Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :Congrats Sarah, keep up the good work, and bad luck with the Hawks - next year, eh? :) Cheers, '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 09:39, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
274113 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274105 +++$+++ 274112 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.190408400E09 +++$+++ Thanks Daniel. Much appreciated. Yeah, the Hawks were quite disappointing last weekend but at the same time, I'm quite happy that they made it as far as they did this year and hopefully they'll be able to build on it next season. I don't think many people would have tipped us to even make it into the eight this year, so from that perspective it's all good. The pies did well getting as far as they did, too. Hope all is good with you my friend; must catch up sometime on Gtalk. :) Cheers Danny,  +++$+++ ::Thanks Daniel. Much appreciated. Yeah, the Hawks were quite disappointing last weekend but at the same time, I'm quite happy that they made it as far as they did this year and hopefully they'll be able to build on it next season. I don't think many people would have tipped us to even make it into the eight this year, so from that perspective it's all good. The pies did well getting as far as they did, too. Hope all is good with you my friend; must catch up sometime on Gtalk. :) Cheers Danny, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

11962 +++$+++ Lurcher66 +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-06 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.231279140E09 +++$+++ Without disambig other articles using this popular title cannot be created. Thanks.  +++$+++ Without disambig other articles using this popular title cannot be created. Thanks. [[User:Lurcher66|Lurcher66]] ([[User talk:Lurcher66|talk]]) 13:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
11963 +++$+++ Lurcher66 +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11962 +++$+++ 11962 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.231279320E09 +++$+++ Your edit summary makes no sense. The disambig page is required, and that anime series is not the definition of \"Ghost Hunt\"  +++$+++ :Your edit summary makes no sense. The disambig page is required, and that anime series is not the definition of "Ghost Hunt" [[User:Lurcher66|Lurcher66]] ([[User talk:Lurcher66|talk]]) 14:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
11964 +++$+++ Lurcher66 +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11962 +++$+++ 11963 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.231279620E09 +++$+++ The TV series I am trying to create the page about has nothing to do with the anime\/manga! It is an unrelated, New Zealand TV show documenting the paranormal. Hence the very important disambig page.  +++$+++ ::The TV series I am trying to create the page about has nothing to do with the anime/manga! It is an unrelated, New Zealand TV show documenting the paranormal. Hence the very important disambig page. [[User:Lurcher66|Lurcher66]] ([[User talk:Lurcher66|talk]]) 14:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
11965 +++$+++ Lurcher66 +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11962 +++$+++ 11964 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.231280040E09 +++$+++ Whatever, now I frankly can't be fucking asked to bother starting the page when there are unhelpful pricks like you around doing your best to own your silly little pages.  +++$+++ :::Whatever, now I frankly can't be fucking asked to bother starting the page when there are unhelpful pricks like you around doing your best to own your silly little pages. [[User:Lurcher66|Lurcher66]] ([[User talk:Lurcher66|talk]]) 14:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

536254 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-04 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.167962040E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I've nominated [[User:Geo.plrd\/Phoenix]] for deletion. Please see [[Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion\/User:Geo.plrd\/Phoenix]] for the discussion and my reasoning. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi there. I've nominated [[User:Geo.plrd/Phoenix]] for deletion. Please see [[Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Geo.plrd/Phoenix]] for the discussion and my reasoning. Thanks. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 17:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
536255 +++$+++ Merope +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536254 +++$+++ 536254 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.167964260E09 +++$+++ I have speedied these pages as being in violation of [[WP:CSD#G4]], an attempt to recreate deleted material.  The community consensus is to disband Esperanza, and so any attempts to revive it are viewed as [[WP:POINT|disrupting the project to make a point]].  If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page.  --  +++$+++ :I have speedied these pages as being in violation of [[WP:CSD#G4]], an attempt to recreate deleted material.  The community consensus is to disband Esperanza, and so any attempts to revive it are viewed as [[WP:POINT|disrupting the project to make a point]].  If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page.  -- [[User:Merope|<b><font color="#3D59AB">Merope</font></b>]] 18:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
536256 +++$+++ Merope +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536254 +++$+++ 536255 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.168051620E09 +++$+++ Given that you were actively seeking participants, I see it as an attempt to buck consensus and reinstate a group that the community has decided to disband.  Perhaps after the dust has settled a new group can emerge, but at this point I'm not inclined to reinstate the pages.  If any such resurrection of Esperanza is going to succeed, it needs to be done through the appropriate channels and after the emotions have quieted.  You are free to request a deletion review, if you wish; however, I believe that many other administrators will feel it is a violation of [[WP:CSD#G4]].  --  +++$+++ ::Given that you were actively seeking participants, I see it as an attempt to buck consensus and reinstate a group that the community has decided to disband.  Perhaps after the dust has settled a new group can emerge, but at this point I'm not inclined to reinstate the pages.  If any such resurrection of Esperanza is going to succeed, it needs to be done through the appropriate channels and after the emotions have quieted.  You are free to request a deletion review, if you wish; however, I believe that many other administrators will feel it is a violation of [[WP:CSD#G4]].  -- [[User:Merope|<b><font color="#3D59AB">Merope</font></b>]] 18:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

274114 +++$+++ Shot info +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274114 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.190221620E09 +++$+++ I do believe somebody is saying nasty things about you on another forum [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AKangaroo_court&diff=158918446&oldid=158917763].  '''<font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ I do believe somebody is saying nasty things about you on another forum [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AKangaroo_court&diff=158918446&oldid=158917763].  '''<font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Shot info|<font color="#8000" size="2">Shot info</font>]]</font>''' 10:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
274115 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274114 +++$+++ 274114 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.190223900E09 +++$+++ How idiotic. I removed that edit because it was a copyvio. Even the capped words show up on a google search of that material. [http:\/\/www.google.com.au\/search?hl=en&q=COMMON+LAW+is+the+LAW+of+the+PEOPLE%2C+by+the+PEOPLE+and+for+the+PEOPLE.+It+is+made+by+the&btnG=Google+Search&meta=] Editorial issues are another obvious matter, but the reason I reverted him was purely based on the fact that he had copy and pasted from elsewhere, as noted in my edit summary. Thanks for letting me know.  +++$+++ :How idiotic. I removed that edit because it was a copyvio. Even the capped words show up on a google search of that material. [http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=COMMON+LAW+is+the+LAW+of+the+PEOPLE%2C+by+the+PEOPLE+and+for+the+PEOPLE.+It+is+made+by+the&btnG=Google+Search&meta=] Editorial issues are another obvious matter, but the reason I reverted him was purely based on the fact that he had copy and pasted from elsewhere, as noted in my edit summary. Thanks for letting me know. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:45, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

11971 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Kazu-kun +++$+++ 11971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311169980E09 +++$+++ Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 06:53, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
11972 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11971 +++$+++ 11971 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.309660620E09 +++$+++ That appeared to be leftover from a previous vandal's edit. Your edit resembled vandalism in that you added the acronym \"lol\" to the article instead of [[Wikipedia:Vandalism#How_to_respond_to_vandalism|properly fixing it]]. Keep this in mind for next time.  +++$+++ :That appeared to be leftover from a previous vandal's edit. Your edit resembled vandalism in that you added the acronym "lol" to the article instead of [[Wikipedia:Vandalism#How_to_respond_to_vandalism|properly fixing it]]. Keep this in mind for next time. [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <font color="#960018"></font> <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 19:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
11973 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11971 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.309809540E09 +++$+++ Thanks. And remember&mdash;please feel free to remove vandalism upon spotting it!  +++$+++ :::Thanks. And remember&mdash;please feel free to remove vandalism upon spotting it! [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <font color="#960018"></font> <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 12:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

274117 +++$+++ Timotab +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.190323500E09 +++$+++ that it's not a friend, but the uh... \"good lady\" herself.&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ that it's not a friend, but the uh... "good lady" herself.&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Timotab|Timotab]] [[User_talk:Timotab|<sup>Timothy (not Tim </sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Timotab|<sup>dagnabbit!)</sup>]] 14:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
274118 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274117 +++$+++ 274117 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.190323680E09 +++$+++ Really? I didn't know that. I've seen that person on other sites (they're obviously very easy to spot) but I thought it was just an obsessed fan who was running her site. Didn't david speak to both of them? The writing is terrible, they need to learn how to use punctuation. Anyway, the IP is duly blocked for a month for block evasion. Let's see if they come back with a new IP. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Really? I didn't know that. I've seen that person on other sites (they're obviously very easy to spot) but I thought it was just an obsessed fan who was running her site. Didn't david speak to both of them? The writing is terrible, they need to learn how to use punctuation. Anyway, the IP is duly blocked for a month for block evasion. Let's see if they come back with a new IP. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
274119 +++$+++ Timotab +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274117 +++$+++ 274118 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.190324040E09 +++$+++ [[User:Tonyx123|Tonyx123]], who originally created the biographical article confirmed to David that it's not a fan, but the lady herself.  I will not argue with your assessment of \"obsessed\" :)  After watching our efforts to verify the information, Tony felt rather duped.  As you've blocked the IP, could you please update [[WP:ANI]]?  Thanks!&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ ::[[User:Tonyx123|Tonyx123]], who originally created the biographical article confirmed to David that it's not a fan, but the lady herself.  I will not argue with your assessment of "obsessed" :)  After watching our efforts to verify the information, Tony felt rather duped.  As you've blocked the IP, could you please update [[WP:ANI]]?  Thanks!&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Timotab|Timotab]] [[User_talk:Timotab|<sup>Timothy (not Tim </sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Timotab|<sup>dagnabbit!)</sup>]] 14:34, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
274120 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274117 +++$+++ 274119 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.190324280E09 +++$+++ Wow, that's really interesting...and embarrassing...for her! She is on quite a mission when you see the posts on other sites and arguing with people on blogs and such. It's quite sad really. Thanks Timothy.  +++$+++ :::Wow, that's really interesting...and embarrassing...for her! She is on quite a mission when you see the posts on other sites and arguing with people on blogs and such. It's quite sad really. Thanks Timothy. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

11974 +++$+++ Jcaraballo +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309908840E09 +++$+++ Thank you! =)!--'''<font face=\"Comic Sans\"> +++$+++ Thank you! =)!--'''<font face="Comic Sans">[[User:Jcaraballo|<font color="FF0000">Jc</font><font color="#FF3333">a</font>]][[User Talk:Jcaraballo|<font color="#FF0033">ra</font><font color="FF3300">b</font><font color="#FF6600">allo</font>]]</font>''' 16:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
11975 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11974 +++$+++ 11974 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.309909140E09 +++$+++ You're welcome; you deserved it!  +++$+++ :You're welcome; you deserved it! [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <font color="#960018"></font> <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 16:39, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

11976 +++$+++ Jezhotwells +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-07 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310108160E09 +++$+++ The article [[Mir EO-19]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[Image:Symbol wait.svg|20px]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See [[Talk:Mir EO-19]] for things which need to be addressed.  +++$+++ The article [[Mir EO-19]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[Image:Symbol wait.svg|20px]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See [[Talk:Mir EO-19]] for things which need to be addressed. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 23:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
11977 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11976 +++$+++ 11976 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.310108280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your review; will address the concerns shortly.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your review; will address the concerns shortly. [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <font color="#960018"></font> <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 23:58, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

274121 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274121 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.190310060E09 +++$+++ He contacted me too.  I've missed talking to you, Sarah. &mdash; +++$+++ He contacted me too.  I've missed talking to you, Sarah. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 10:41, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
274122 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274121 +++$+++ 274121 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.190311560E09 +++$+++ Will do; let's catch up. BTW, happy one year!  You should get your mop bronzed. :-) &mdash; +++$+++ :Will do; let's catch up. BTW, happy one year!  You should get your mop bronzed. :-) &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 11:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
274123 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274121 +++$+++ 274122 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.190311680E09 +++$+++ Thanks! It's gone really fast, hard to believe that it's been a year already. Talk to you soon, Viri. :)  +++$+++ ::Thanks! It's gone really fast, hard to believe that it's been a year already. Talk to you soon, Viri. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
274124 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274121 +++$+++ 274123 +++$+++ 2007-09-24 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.190687280E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, and thanks for keeping me in the loop.  It looks like I was too late to comment as the discussion was closed.  Please look for an e-mail from me in your inbox shortly. :) &mdash; +++$+++ :::Hi Sarah, and thanks for keeping me in the loop.  It looks like I was too late to comment as the discussion was closed.  Please look for an e-mail from me in your inbox shortly. :) &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 19:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
274125 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274121 +++$+++ 274124 +++$+++ 2007-09-24 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.190688660E09 +++$+++ I just sent an e-mail using the \"e-mail this user\" link on this page.  Hope the e-mail gremlins avoid it, and it goes to the same account as the old one. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I just sent an e-mail using the "e-mail this user" link on this page.  Hope the e-mail gremlins avoid it, and it goes to the same account as the old one. &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 19:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
274126 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274121 +++$+++ 274125 +++$+++ 2007-09-24 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.190692380E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I figured I was dealing with old information.  Seriously, no hurry on the reply, Sarah. Keeps me in suspense. :) &mdash; +++$+++ :::::Yeah, I figured I was dealing with old information.  Seriously, no hurry on the reply, Sarah. Keeps me in suspense. :) &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 20:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

11978 +++$+++ Mlm42 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11978 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.310553600E09 +++$+++ Great work with the successful GA! Unfortunately all the astronautix.com references should probably now be replaced, since the website now appears to be gone..  +++$+++ Great work with the successful GA! Unfortunately all the astronautix.com references should probably now be replaced, since the website now appears to be gone.. [[User:Mlm42|Mlm42]] ([[User talk:Mlm42|talk]]) 03:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
11979 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11978 +++$+++ 11978 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.310589480E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for letting me know. The refs have been replaced by screenshots of astronautix pages from web archives.  +++$+++ :Thanks very much for letting me know. The refs have been replaced by screenshots of astronautix pages from web archives. [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <font color="#960018"></font> <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 13:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
11980 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11978 +++$+++ 11978 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.310151240E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I've replied.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I've replied. [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <font color="#960018"></font> <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 11:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
11981 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11978 +++$+++ 11978 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310495040E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, this band does not pass [[WP:BAND|our notability guideline for musical ensembles]]. Thus it is inappropriate to include in an encyclopedia at this time. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Unfortunately, this band does not pass [[WP:BAND|our notability guideline for musical ensembles]]. Thus it is inappropriate to include in an encyclopedia at this time. Thanks, [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <font color="#960018"></font> <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 11:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

11982 +++$+++ Reaper Eternal +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.310777280E09 +++$+++ Good luck in hell week!  +++$+++ Good luck in hell week! [[User:Reaper Eternal|Reaper Eternal]] ([[User talk:Reaper Eternal|talk]]) 17:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
11983 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11982 +++$+++ 11982 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.310777520E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I appreciate the kind sentiment and your support! Regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks, I appreciate the kind sentiment and your support! Regards, [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <font color="#960018"></font> <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 17:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
11984 +++$+++ Reaper Eternal +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11982 +++$+++ 11983 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.311361740E09 +++$+++ And it looks like you are about to pass unopposed! Nice job!  +++$+++ ::And it looks like you are about to pass unopposed! Nice job! [[User:Reaper Eternal|Reaper Eternal]] ([[User talk:Reaper Eternal|talk]]) 12:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
11985 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11982 +++$+++ 11984 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311361800E09 +++$+++ 'Tis not over 'til the [[WP:CRAT|fat lady]] sings! Anyway, thanks very much for your support and good luck yourself!  +++$+++ :::'Tis not over 'til the [[WP:CRAT|fat lady]] sings! Anyway, thanks very much for your support and good luck yourself! [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 12:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

274127 +++$+++ Brendan.lloyd +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-24 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.190634960E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. Can you help me by explaining what editors can do when deceptive and misleading comments are being made about them on another editor's talkpage, in what should instead be a content debate, and no right of reply is being given by that latter editor? --''' +++$+++ Hi Sarah. Can you help me by explaining what editors can do when deceptive and misleading comments are being made about them on another editor's talkpage, in what should instead be a content debate, and no right of reply is being given by that latter editor? --'''[[User:Brendan.lloyd|Brendan Lloyd]]''' <span style="font-size:80%">[ [[Special:Contributions/Brendan.lloyd|contribs]] ]</span> 04:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
274128 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274127 +++$+++ 274127 +++$+++ 2007-09-24 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.190635140E09 +++$+++ People are allowed to remove messages from their talk page if they wish and you have no right to try to force them to keep messages. The only time when people might be made to keep messages on their talk page is in cases of blocked users removing block messages and recent admin warnings. You have no right of reply on people's talk pages and if you continue edit warring on Peter's page, you are the one who will be blocked. If you want to discuss article content, I suggest you use the article's talk page.  +++$+++ :People are allowed to remove messages from their talk page if they wish and you have no right to try to force them to keep messages. The only time when people might be made to keep messages on their talk page is in cases of blocked users removing block messages and recent admin warnings. You have no right of reply on people's talk pages and if you continue edit warring on Peter's page, you are the one who will be blocked. If you want to discuss article content, I suggest you use the article's talk page. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

274129 +++$+++ Brendan.lloyd +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274129 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-24 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.190636100E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah, I am using the article talkpage to discuss content. My question though relates to the specific instance of what can be done when an editor makes deceptive and misleading comments (on their talkpage) about another editor that go unquestioned and are allowed to stand. I am asking for your help and advice as an admin user. If you were placed in that situation, would you consider that reasonable? What would you do (or suggest doing) in respect of that specific problem (given the [[WP:AGF|lack of good faith]] that it arguably demonstrates on the part of that editor)? --''' +++$+++ Thanks Sarah, I am using the article talkpage to discuss content. My question though relates to the specific instance of what can be done when an editor makes deceptive and misleading comments (on their talkpage) about another editor that go unquestioned and are allowed to stand. I am asking for your help and advice as an admin user. If you were placed in that situation, would you consider that reasonable? What would you do (or suggest doing) in respect of that specific problem (given the [[WP:AGF|lack of good faith]] that it arguably demonstrates on the part of that editor)? --'''[[User:Brendan.lloyd|Brendan Lloyd]]''' <span style="font-size:80%">[ [[Special:Contributions/Brendan.lloyd|contribs]] ]</span> 05:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
274130 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274129 +++$+++ 274129 +++$+++ 2007-09-24 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.190655360E09 +++$+++ If I were in what I understand is your situation, i.e. someone has made a comment about you that you feel is false or misleading, I would try to tell them nicely that they are mistaken, but if they reverted my comment, I would walk away and ignore it, taking their reversion as an confirmation of the fact that they have indeed read it. Have a look at the section above titled \"FYI\" and you will see Shot info posted a message with a link to a comment on the talk page for the kangaroo court article where someone has posted a link to their complaint about me on Yahoo Answers and accused me, both here and on Yahoo Answers, of being racist and a censor because I reverted them posting a copyright violation. I have friends and family members from very diverse backgrounds and I find  being called a racist and a bigot ''highly'' offensive, but you don't see me edit warring over deleting the comment. It just isn't worth it and you'll last a lot longer here if you develop a thicker skin and only stake your claims on issues and disputes which really matter, not every little thing that comes along. You also need to keep in mind that admins always look at the behaviour and actions of both parties and if it is obvious that the best solution is to simply walk away but you have chosen instead to continue to edit war and cause disruption, you run the risk of being blocked yourself and of admins subconsciously putting you into the category of people who enjoy making a mountain out of a mole hill and are always crying wolf. If you are worried that Peter's comment might give a third party the wrong impression about you, it is worth noting that you have already denied being blocked for edit warring on Children Overboard Affair and two of those denials are still there on Peter's talk page. Why does there have to be a third denial? I'm sure that anyone who reads that section and cares whether you were blocked or not will click on your name and check your log and see for themselves that you weren't. If you aren't satisfied with that then you are free to copy the thread to ''your own'' talk page where you may respond to it to your heart's desire. I have done this myself; [[User_talk:Sarah\/Archive14#Your_reversions_of_my_categorys|this]] section originated on the other person's talk page and they began selectively deleting my messages, so I chose to copy all the messages here intact in case I needed them for future reference. As far as your comment about assuming good faith goes, if you are following AGF, then it doesn't really matter, does it? I mean, if you're assuming good faith yourself then you won't assume that they are acting in bad faith, right?  +++$+++ :If I were in what I understand is your situation, i.e. someone has made a comment about you that you feel is false or misleading, I would try to tell them nicely that they are mistaken, but if they reverted my comment, I would walk away and ignore it, taking their reversion as an confirmation of the fact that they have indeed read it. Have a look at the section above titled "FYI" and you will see Shot info posted a message with a link to a comment on the talk page for the kangaroo court article where someone has posted a link to their complaint about me on Yahoo Answers and accused me, both here and on Yahoo Answers, of being racist and a censor because I reverted them posting a copyright violation. I have friends and family members from very diverse backgrounds and I find  being called a racist and a bigot ''highly'' offensive, but you don't see me edit warring over deleting the comment. It just isn't worth it and you'll last a lot longer here if you develop a thicker skin and only stake your claims on issues and disputes which really matter, not every little thing that comes along. You also need to keep in mind that admins always look at the behaviour and actions of both parties and if it is obvious that the best solution is to simply walk away but you have chosen instead to continue to edit war and cause disruption, you run the risk of being blocked yourself and of admins subconsciously putting you into the category of people who enjoy making a mountain out of a mole hill and are always crying wolf. If you are worried that Peter's comment might give a third party the wrong impression about you, it is worth noting that you have already denied being blocked for edit warring on Children Overboard Affair and two of those denials are still there on Peter's talk page. Why does there have to be a third denial? I'm sure that anyone who reads that section and cares whether you were blocked or not will click on your name and check your log and see for themselves that you weren't. If you aren't satisfied with that then you are free to copy the thread to ''your own'' talk page where you may respond to it to your heart's desire. I have done this myself; [[User_talk:Sarah/Archive14#Your_reversions_of_my_categorys|this]] section originated on the other person's talk page and they began selectively deleting my messages, so I chose to copy all the messages here intact in case I needed them for future reference. As far as your comment about assuming good faith goes, if you are following AGF, then it doesn't really matter, does it? I mean, if you're assuming good faith yourself then you won't assume that they are acting in bad faith, right? [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

11986 +++$+++ b +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11986 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311145500E09 +++$+++ It's not enough for me to oppose over it (because it was from over two years ago), but please properly give descriptions and sources for your images.  [[:File:The human lungs.png]] appears to have been cropped from [[:File:Inhalation diagram.svg]] (it would have been better to do it as an SVG, but that's a completely unrelated topic and obviously not everyone has an SVG editor at their disposal, which is completely understandable).  Even though you are under no ''legal'' obligation to credit the original uploader since she did release her work into the public domain, not crediting the source is still considered [[plagiarism]].  You should give the image a meaningful description and properly credit the source. -- +++$+++ It's not enough for me to oppose over it (because it was from over two years ago), but please properly give descriptions and sources for your images.  [[:File:The human lungs.png]] appears to have been cropped from [[:File:Inhalation diagram.svg]] (it would have been better to do it as an SVG, but that's a completely unrelated topic and obviously not everyone has an SVG editor at their disposal, which is completely understandable).  Even though you are under no ''legal'' obligation to credit the original uploader since she did release her work into the public domain, not crediting the source is still considered [[plagiarism]].  You should give the image a meaningful description and properly credit the source. --[[User:B|B]] ([[User talk:B|talk]]) 00:05, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
11987 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11986 +++$+++ 11986 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311147540E09 +++$+++ {{done}} Stupid mistake on my part, duly admitted. Thank you for kindly bringing this to my attention.  +++$+++ :{{done}} Stupid mistake on my part, duly admitted. Thank you for kindly bringing this to my attention. [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 00:39, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
11988 +++$+++ b +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11986 +++$+++ 11987 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311153540E09 +++$+++ Glad to help and thank you for taking care of it so quickly. -- +++$+++ ::Glad to help and thank you for taking care of it so quickly. --[[User:B|B]] ([[User talk:B|talk]]) 02:19, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

536275 +++$+++ Tewy +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.168506960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the offer, but since [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&oldid=99913531#Ranks_and_hierarchies Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#Ranks and hierarchies]], I don't see the need to have an official \"status\" such as overseer. I'll continue with maintenance, etc., but I don't think I need the title to help out. --'''<font color=\"#007FFF\"> +++$+++ Thanks for the offer, but since [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=99913531#Ranks_and_hierarchies Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Ranks and hierarchies]], I don't see the need to have an official "status" such as overseer. I'll continue with maintenance, etc., but I don't think I need the title to help out. --'''<font color="#007FFF">[[User:Tewy|Tewy]]</font>''' 01:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
536276 +++$+++ Tewy +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536275 +++$+++ 536275 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.168511520E09 +++$+++ What I mean is I don't care whether I'm an overseer or not, because I'll be doing the same things. --'''<font color=\"#007FFF\"> +++$+++ *What I mean is I don't care whether I'm an overseer or not, because I'll be doing the same things. --'''<font color="#007FFF">[[User:Tewy|Tewy]]</font>''' 02:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

274132 +++$+++ Shot info +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-25 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.190783640E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, would you be able to give us some advise here - [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3A194.168.3.18&diff=160345299&oldid=160138088]?  Thanks '''<font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ Hi Sarah, would you be able to give us some advise here - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A194.168.3.18&diff=160345299&oldid=160138088]?  Thanks '''<font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Shot info|<font color="#8000" size="2">Shot info</font>]]</font>''' 22:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
274133 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274132 +++$+++ 274132 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.190890140E09 +++$+++ Hi Shot. I've been keeping an eye on him but he seems to have stopped edit waring, or at least, he hasn't edited again. I'll check back on him again later. I think maybe he doesn't really understand what Wikipedia is about. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi Shot. I've been keeping an eye on him but he seems to have stopped edit waring, or at least, he hasn't edited again. I'll check back on him again later. I think maybe he doesn't really understand what Wikipedia is about. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

11990 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11990 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.311365520E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on your recent ([[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Tyrol5|unanimous!]]) RFA. I've flipped some bits around and now you can cause all manner of harm with the touch of a few buttons. Let me know if I can be of any assistance. Happy adminning, \u2013 +++$+++ Congratulations on your recent ([[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tyrol5|unanimous!]]) RFA. I've flipped some bits around and now you can cause all manner of harm with the touch of a few buttons. Let me know if I can be of any assistance. Happy adminning, –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 13:12, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
11991 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11990 +++$+++ 11990 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.311365760E09 +++$+++ Now off to delete the main page and indef. Jimbo! Thanks a lot Xeno!  +++$+++ :Now off to delete the main page and indef. Jimbo! Thanks a lot Xeno! [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 13:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
11992 +++$+++ TParis +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11990 +++$+++ 11991 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311368460E09 +++$+++ Congrats!  Good luck with Jimbo's indef, let me know how that turns out for you.--v\/r -  +++$+++ ::Congrats!  Good luck with Jimbo's indef, let me know how that turns out for you.--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 14:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
11993 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11990 +++$+++ 11992 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.311368580E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Won't be pretty, I'm sure; it'll be the first ''and'' last block of my adminship!  +++$+++ :::Thanks! Won't be pretty, I'm sure; it'll be the first ''and'' last block of my adminship! [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 14:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

274136 +++$+++ Peterchristopher +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274136 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-02 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.191345180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Peterchristopher|Peterchristopher]] 10:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
274137 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274136 +++$+++ 274136 +++$+++ 2007-10-04 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.191550740E09 +++$+++ Heh. Thanks for your...evaluation. A \"hangon\" tag doesn't guarantee that your articles will avoid deletion (please note that the hangon tag itself says: \"this request is not binding, and the page may still be deleted if the page unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if the promised explanation is not provided very soon.\") If an administrator looks at the article, and then looks at your \"hangon\", and they believe that it is not suitable and can't meet our standards, they are not obliged to leave the article up. I just looked at your \"hangon\" on the deleted talk page and it did not help establish notability, it simply noted [[WP:OR|original research]] that you knew the man personally and your assertion that he is notable and that anyone who doesn't agree spends too much time listening to Pearl Jam. The way to save the article would have been to cite multiple, non-trivial, third party, [[WP:V|verifiable]] [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I think you are laboring under a number of misunderstandings regarding the purpose of Wikipedia and our deletion and blocking policies and notability guidelines, because your claims are, quite simply, false. I am not aware of any administrator abuse concerning you, but I would have been willing to look at your claims of \"administrator abuse\" and to try to help you bring your articles up to standard, but your attitude is quite foul and does not make me feel inclined to spend any time helping you. If several administrators tell you that your behaviour on Wikipedia is unacceptable and that your articles were not up to our standards, perhaps you should consider the possibility that they are telling you the truth, rather than claiming that they have no clue what they are talking about and that you, instead, have a better knowledge of Wikipedia policy and guidelines and their application. If you changed your aggressive and abusive attitude, you would find many people were willing to help you, but I can't think of any reason why anyone would want to help you when you behave like this. If you want to desert the project, that is up to you. However, I am quite certain that if you continue down this path of such arrogant, aggression and abusive behaviour and your apparent belief that you have inherent rights on Wikipedia, the project will rather desert you.  +++$+++ :Heh. Thanks for your...evaluation. A "hangon" tag doesn't guarantee that your articles will avoid deletion (please note that the hangon tag itself says: "this request is not binding, and the page may still be deleted if the page unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if the promised explanation is not provided very soon.") If an administrator looks at the article, and then looks at your "hangon", and they believe that it is not suitable and can't meet our standards, they are not obliged to leave the article up. I just looked at your "hangon" on the deleted talk page and it did not help establish notability, it simply noted [[WP:OR|original research]] that you knew the man personally and your assertion that he is notable and that anyone who doesn't agree spends too much time listening to Pearl Jam. The way to save the article would have been to cite multiple, non-trivial, third party, [[WP:V|verifiable]] [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I think you are laboring under a number of misunderstandings regarding the purpose of Wikipedia and our deletion and blocking policies and notability guidelines, because your claims are, quite simply, false. I am not aware of any administrator abuse concerning you, but I would have been willing to look at your claims of "administrator abuse" and to try to help you bring your articles up to standard, but your attitude is quite foul and does not make me feel inclined to spend any time helping you. If several administrators tell you that your behaviour on Wikipedia is unacceptable and that your articles were not up to our standards, perhaps you should consider the possibility that they are telling you the truth, rather than claiming that they have no clue what they are talking about and that you, instead, have a better knowledge of Wikipedia policy and guidelines and their application. If you changed your aggressive and abusive attitude, you would find many people were willing to help you, but I can't think of any reason why anyone would want to help you when you behave like this. If you want to desert the project, that is up to you. However, I am quite certain that if you continue down this path of such arrogant, aggression and abusive behaviour and your apparent belief that you have inherent rights on Wikipedia, the project will rather desert you. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 19:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

11994 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311376080E09 +++$+++ '''Heartiest congrats!''' You  won't  find much of any  use in  my  vector.js page, but  my  [[user:Kudpung\/Dashboard|toolbox]] is very  heavy  and full of a mess of useful stuff for admins that  you  are welcome to  plunder. Do  what  you  like to  the main  page, just  don't  delete my  user page! -- +++$+++ '''Heartiest congrats!''' You  won't  find much of any  use in  my  vector.js page, but  my  [[user:Kudpung/Dashboard|toolbox]] is very  heavy  and full of a mess of useful stuff for admins that  you  are welcome to  plunder. Do  what  you  like to  the main  page, just  don't  delete my  user page! --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 16:08, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
11995 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11994 +++$+++ 11994 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.311376920E09 +++$+++ Now adding Kudpung's userpage to list of pages to delete... In all seriousness, thank you for your congrats and wonderful support; it is much appreciated! Regards,  +++$+++ :Now adding Kudpung's userpage to list of pages to delete... In all seriousness, thank you for your congrats and wonderful support; it is much appreciated! Regards, [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 16:22, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
11996 +++$+++ Atama +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11994 +++$+++ 11995 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311380460E09 +++$+++ There was never a doubt you would pass, but still it's good to see it formally acknowledged. You'll be an excellent administrator. -- ''' +++$+++ ::There was never a doubt you would pass, but still it's good to see it formally acknowledged. You'll be an excellent administrator. -- '''[[User:Atama|<span style="color:#06F">At</span><span style="color:#03B">am</span><span style="color:#006">a</span>]]'''[[User talk:Atama|<span style="color:#000">頭</span>]] 17:21, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
11997 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11994 +++$+++ 11996 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311380700E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your confidence in my abilities and your support Atama, 'tis much appreciated! I will strive to live up to the trust the community has invested in me.  +++$+++ :::Thank you for your confidence in my abilities and your support Atama, 'tis much appreciated! I will strive to live up to the trust the community has invested in me. [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 17:25, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

526287 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-28 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.159432140E09 +++$+++ I've written this article on this Eagle Scout and war hero. I've asked permission to use a photo of him. We'll see. Could you both look it over for military info, info box format, tag it, etc? The lead could use some work too. I tagged it a weak B-class for now. +++$+++ I've written this article on this Eagle Scout and war hero. I've asked permission to use a photo of him. We'll see. Could you both look it over for military info, info box format, tag it, etc? The lead could use some work too. I tagged it a weak B-class for now.[[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 01:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
526288 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526287 +++$+++ 526287 +++$+++ 2006-09-28 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.159434360E09 +++$+++ Tks. Pls see my note at [[Talk:USS Brinkley Bass (DD-887)]]. Can you or someone you know interpret what I found?  +++$+++ :Tks. Pls see my note at [[Talk:USS Brinkley Bass (DD-887)]]. Can you or someone you know interpret what I found? [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 02:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
526289 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526287 +++$+++ 526287 +++$+++ 2006-09-28 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.159435440E09 +++$+++ I've nominated this for DYK (2 NC's less than 2 months apart).  +++$+++ :I've nominated this for DYK (2 NC's less than 2 months apart). [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 02:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
526290 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526287 +++$+++ 526289 +++$+++ 2006-09-28 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.159436340E09 +++$+++ Is the asterisk in the infobox a stray mark or does it mean something?  +++$+++ ::Is the asterisk in the infobox a stray mark or does it mean something? [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 02:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
526291 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526287 +++$+++ 526290 +++$+++ 2006-09-28 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.159437120E09 +++$+++ [[VF-74]] needs tagging and some work. Thanks for all the help tonight. TTFN.  +++$+++ :::[[VF-74]] needs tagging and some work. Thanks for all the help tonight. TTFN. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 02:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
526292 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526287 +++$+++ 526289 +++$+++ 2006-09-29 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.159517040E09 +++$+++ MADE DYK!!  +++$+++ ::MADE DYK!! [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 01:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
526293 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526287 +++$+++ 526289 +++$+++ 2006-09-29 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.159570080E09 +++$+++ [[Nadezhda Durova]] needs tag. Quite interesting.  +++$+++ ::[[Nadezhda Durova]] needs tag. Quite interesting. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 15:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
526294 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526287 +++$+++ 526289 +++$+++ 2006-10-08 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.160290920E09 +++$+++ Added to box the invasion of southern France, in article Operation Dragoon.  +++$+++ ::Added to box the invasion of southern France, in article Operation Dragoon. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 00:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

11998 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11998 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.311427980E09 +++$+++ While I remember before we run out of stock (fat chance!), I'll give you this T-shirt to wear when you are editing. It'll save messing up your normal clothes while doing admin dirty work.  +++$+++ While I remember before we run out of stock (fat chance!), I'll give you this T-shirt to wear when you are editing. It'll save messing up your normal clothes while doing admin dirty work. [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 06:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
11999 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11998 +++$+++ 11998 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311447060E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Kudpung! I almost forgot about the shirt!  +++$+++ :Thanks, Kudpung! I almost forgot about the shirt! [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 11:51, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
12000 +++$+++ M.O.X +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11998 +++$+++ 11999 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311576360E09 +++$+++ Congrats Tyrol :) sorry I missed your RfA! \u2014<span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\">''' +++$+++ ::Congrats Tyrol :) sorry I missed your RfA! —<span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">'''[[User:M.O.X|<span style="color:#003366">James</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:M.O.X|<span style="color:#003366">Talk</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/M.O.X|<span style="color:#003366">Contribs</span>]])</sup> • 9:46am''' •</span> 23:46, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
12001 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 11998 +++$+++ 12000 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.311581520E09 +++$+++ It's quite alright; thanks for the kind thought M.O.X.!  +++$+++ :::It's quite alright; thanks for the kind thought M.O.X.! [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 01:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

274145 +++$+++ FenderTele +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274145 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-03 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.191422640E09 +++$+++ How's that for copyright infringement and offending people who might not want the world to become communist?  +++$+++ How's that for copyright infringement and offending people who might not want the world to become communist? [[User:FenderTele|<font color="#690">Fender</font><font color="#000">Tele</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:FenderTele|<font color="#690">Criticise</font>]]</sup> 07:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
274146 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274145 +++$+++ 274145 +++$+++ 2007-10-04 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.191530340E09 +++$+++ Mmmm. I deleted it as a copyvio and for disparaging comments. Is this another one of your school mates? Thanks for letting me know about it.  +++$+++ :Mmmm. I deleted it as a copyvio and for disparaging comments. Is this another one of your school mates? Thanks for letting me know about it. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
274147 +++$+++ FenderTele +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274145 +++$+++ 274146 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.191666480E09 +++$+++ No way.  +++$+++ ::No way. [[User:FenderTele|<font color="#690">Fender</font><font color="#000">Tele</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:FenderTele|<font color="#690">Criticise</font>]]</sup> 03:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

12002 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 12002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311642300E09 +++$+++ Hi Tyrol. I've left  a more comprehensive reply  for you  both  on  my  talk  page, to  which  I'll  add, that  although  we need to  keep  an even balance between coordinators and the task  force members, you  are most  welcome to  put  your name on  the coord list and try  to  galvanise people into  action. -- +++$+++ Hi Tyrol. I've left  a more comprehensive reply  for you  both  on  my  talk  page, to  which  I'll  add, that  although  we need to  keep  an even balance between coordinators and the task  force members, you  are most  welcome to  put  your name on  the coord list and try  to  galvanise people into  action. --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 18:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
12003 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 12002 +++$+++ 12002 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311645480E09 +++$+++ I may very well do so in the future but, alas, the present may not be the best time for me to assume such a role as my RL schedule picks up a bit in the next week or so.  +++$+++ :I may very well do so in the future but, alas, the present may not be the best time for me to assume such a role as my RL schedule picks up a bit in the next week or so. [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 18:58, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

569979 +++$+++ Danny Darko +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-07 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.183877220E09 +++$+++ The song is referenced by others in both the \"[[:We Are the World]]\" and ''[[:Spitting Image]]'' pages. It ''was'' a short article, but fairly concise in that it contained all of the lyrics and the puppets who appeared. In other words, it made more sense than \"He is a funny man that has created Factory and the Hacienda. And, by the way, his wife is great.\"  +++$+++ The song is referenced by others in both the "[[:We Are the World]]" and ''[[:Spitting Image]]'' pages. It ''was'' a short article, but fairly concise in that it contained all of the lyrics and the puppets who appeared. In other words, it made more sense than "He is a funny man that has created Factory and the Hacienda. And, by the way, his wife is great." [[User:Danny Darko|Danny Darko]] 23:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
569980 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 569979 +++$+++ 569979 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.183877700E09 +++$+++ There was nothing in the article to demonstrate its notability above any other sketch that appeared on ''Spitting Image'' and a transcript of a YouTube video doesn't attest to notability either.  Every ''Spitting Image'' sketch depicted a celebrity and several sang parodies of chart hits too.  Their status is no more notable than this sketch.  +++$+++ :There was nothing in the article to demonstrate its notability above any other sketch that appeared on ''Spitting Image'' and a transcript of a YouTube video doesn't attest to notability either.  Every ''Spitting Image'' sketch depicted a celebrity and several sang parodies of chart hits too.  Their status is no more notable than this sketch. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

12004 +++$+++ Avenue X at Cicero +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 12004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.311991860E09 +++$+++ Thanks man!  +++$+++ Thanks man! [[User:Avenue X at Cicero|Avenue X at Cicero]] ([[User talk:Avenue X at Cicero|talk]]) 19:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
12005 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ 12004 +++$+++ 12004 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.311991920E09 +++$+++ No problem; keep up the good work.  +++$+++ :No problem; keep up the good work. [[User:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">'''Tyrol5'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Tyrol5|<font color="#960018">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 19:12, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

274150 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-05 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.191574320E09 +++$+++ Unrelated to Annie, you really should think of becoming an admin yourself. It would make things easier for you if you could just do things yourself instead of having to chase up an admin. Give it some thought. :) Thanks Sandy. All the best,  +++$+++ Unrelated to Annie, you really should think of becoming an admin yourself. It would make things easier for you if you could just do things yourself instead of having to chase up an admin. Give it some thought. :) Thanks Sandy. All the best, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
274151 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274150 +++$+++ 274150 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.191574680E09 +++$+++ I could see you were busy (you've really taken a lot of time and done your best to explain it to her); {{user|Raul654}} checkuser'd and it was Annie, and he told me you were on it.  Gosh, she chews up CHUNKS of my time, and on such silly articles, it makes me crazy.  She's stuck on the Wolff family; if she comes back as another SP, it will surely be there.  Nope, I'm not the admin type, it would make me crazy.  It's too bad there's not some sort of semi-admin, though, that would allow me to be more useful.   +++$+++ :I could see you were busy (you've really taken a lot of time and done your best to explain it to her); {{user|Raul654}} checkuser'd and it was Annie, and he told me you were on it.  Gosh, she chews up CHUNKS of my time, and on such silly articles, it makes me crazy.  She's stuck on the Wolff family; if she comes back as another SP, it will surely be there.  Nope, I'm not the admin type, it would make me crazy.  It's too bad there's not some sort of semi-admin, though, that would allow me to be more useful.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
274152 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274150 +++$+++ 274151 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.191575040E09 +++$+++ I think you'd be a great admin, but I can understand you feeling that way. I don't mind helping with adminy jobs that need to be done, though, so feel free to post anything that you need done and I'll take care of it for you. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::I think you'd be a great admin, but I can understand you feeling that way. I don't mind helping with adminy jobs that need to be done, though, so feel free to post anything that you need done and I'll take care of it for you. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
274153 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274150 +++$+++ 274150 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.191578280E09 +++$+++ By the way, Sandy, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/24.184.193.106 this] looks like it might be the IP to keep an eye on. It looks very stable with edits to the same narrow range of articles going back months, including adding to the [[light switch]] article that same material about Morris Goldberg and William Newton that ATC had on her talk page.  +++$+++ :By the way, Sandy, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/24.184.193.106 this] looks like it might be the IP to keep an eye on. It looks very stable with edits to the same narrow range of articles going back months, including adding to the [[light switch]] article that same material about Morris Goldberg and William Newton that ATC had on her talk page. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
274154 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274150 +++$+++ 274153 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.191578520E09 +++$+++ got it.   +++$+++ ::got it.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
274155 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274150 +++$+++ 274154 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.191579120E09 +++$+++ Oh, for gosh sakes, she's been right under my nose, and I even responded to her on [[Talk:Tourette syndrome]] without checking the IP even though I suspected that IP address.  Sheesh.  I've had my head in a funk ever since {{User|Yomangani}} left.  I should snap out of it and pay attention :-)   +++$+++ :::Oh, for gosh sakes, she's been right under my nose, and I even responded to her on [[Talk:Tourette syndrome]] without checking the IP even though I suspected that IP address.  Sheesh.  I've had my head in a funk ever since {{User|Yomangani}} left.  I should snap out of it and pay attention :-)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
274156 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274150 +++$+++ 274155 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.191580020E09 +++$+++ Yep, it's frustrating, isn't it. Specially when you see that she's been at this for at least six months. And I somehow doubt that ATC was her first account. But at least with a likely IP address, we have a hope of getting control of things now. If need be I'll just try disabling new account creation and anonymous editing on her IP. :)  +++$+++ ::::Yep, it's frustrating, isn't it. Specially when you see that she's been at this for at least six months. And I somehow doubt that ATC was her first account. But at least with a likely IP address, we have a hope of getting control of things now. If need be I'll just try disabling new account creation and anonymous editing on her IP. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

536296 +++$+++ Billbrock +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536296 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-31 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.170307620E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  Must earn living; will follow up in a day or two.   +++$+++ Thank you.  Must earn living; will follow up in a day or two.  [[User:Billbrock|Billbrock]] 21:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
536297 +++$+++ Billbrock +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536296 +++$+++ 536296 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.171268460E09 +++$+++ Upon reflection, I will withdraw request for now.  I'm a partner in a CPA firm and it's a busy time of year....  Thank you for your offer; I may pursue this within WP again when I have the time to spare.   +++$+++ :Upon reflection, I will withdraw request for now.  I'm a partner in a CPA firm and it's a busy time of year....  Thank you for your offer; I may pursue this within WP again when I have the time to spare.  [[User:Billbrock|Billbrock]] 00:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
536298 +++$+++  +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536296 +++$+++ 536296 +++$+++ 2007-02-01 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.170397440E09 +++$+++ I suggest we just take it to the Mediation Committee due to there may be some offical ruleing other that just suggestions by th AMA.  +++$+++ :I suggest we just take it to the Mediation Committee due to there may be some offical ruleing other that just suggestions by th AMA. [[User:cocoaguy|''Cocoaguy 従って '']]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/cocoaguy|contribs]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[User talk:cocoaguy|talk]]</span></sup> [[Special:Random|Get Lost]] 22:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
536299 +++$+++  +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536296 +++$+++ 536298 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.170499920E09 +++$+++ I agree and will take the AMA case to medcom.  +++$+++ ::I agree and will take the AMA case to medcom. [[User:cocoaguy|''Cocoaguy 従って '']]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/cocoaguy|contribs]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[User talk:cocoaguy|talk]]</span></sup> [[Special:Random|Get Lost]] 02:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
536300 +++$+++  +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536296 +++$+++ 536299 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.170501840E09 +++$+++ its now on [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal\/Cases\/2ct7 v. SomeHuman]].  +++$+++ :::its now on [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2ct7 v. SomeHuman]]. [[User:cocoaguy|''Cocoaguy 従って '']]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/cocoaguy|contribs]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[User talk:cocoaguy|talk]]</span></sup> [[Special:Random|Get Lost]] 03:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

12011 +++$+++ Danielkueh +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-19 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.150755600E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Danielkueh|Danielkueh]] 15:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
12012 +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12011 +++$+++ 12011 +++$+++ 2006-06-19 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.150757580E09 +++$+++ I think you may have misunderstood; I meant the page [[neurobiologist|neurobiolog'''ist''']] (which  was just \"'''Neurobiologist ''' is a life scientist who is devoted to the study of neurobiology.\"), not [[neurobiology]]. -- +++$+++ : I think you may have misunderstood; I meant the page [[neurobiologist|neurobiolog'''ist''']] (which  was just "'''Neurobiologist ''' is a life scientist who is devoted to the study of neurobiology."), not [[neurobiology]]. --[[User:AySz88|AySz88]][[Special:Contributions/AySz88|\]][[User talk:AySz88|<font color="#F96">^</font><font color="#F63">-</font><font color="#F30">^</font>]] 15:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

274157 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-05 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.191574740E09 +++$+++ Giving you a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FJehochman&diff=162375303&oldid=162370895 humor alert] in advance. :)  +++$+++ Giving you a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FJehochman&diff=162375303&oldid=162370895 humor alert] in advance. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 01:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
274158 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274157 +++$+++ 274157 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.191575160E09 +++$+++ Hey, that's really nice, Acalamari! Thanks!  +++$+++ :Hey, that's really nice, Acalamari! Thanks! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
274159 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274157 +++$+++ 274158 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.191575280E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) Humor and a compliment often go together well.  +++$+++ ::You're welcome. :) Humor and a compliment often go together well. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 02:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
274160 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274157 +++$+++ 274159 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.191576060E09 +++$+++ Sarah, I'd like you to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship\/Jehochman&diff=next&oldid=162377488 release me from my chest-of-draws prison now] - I promise I'll act less roguely next time! ''' +++$+++ :::Sarah, I'd like you to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Jehochman&diff=next&oldid=162377488 release me from my chest-of-draws prison now] - I promise I'll act less roguely next time! '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 02:21, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
274161 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274157 +++$+++ 274160 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.191576660E09 +++$+++ LOL. \"chest-of-draws prison\" sounds dreadfully painful. However, on consideration, it is ''exactly'' what you deserve since you repaid my kind nomination (which was actually full of ''lies'' about what a great guy you are) by climbing over me on the WP:100 ladder and pushing me down to the equal-ninth spot! And after that, I was quickly out of the Top 10. I mean, seriously, what gratitude!! For that, you can rot in your chest-of-draws prison!  +++$+++ ::::LOL. "chest-of-draws prison" sounds dreadfully painful. However, on consideration, it is ''exactly'' what you deserve since you repaid my kind nomination (which was actually full of ''lies'' about what a great guy you are) by climbing over me on the WP:100 ladder and pushing me down to the equal-ninth spot! And after that, I was quickly out of the Top 10. I mean, seriously, what gratitude!! For that, you can rot in your chest-of-draws prison! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:31, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

12016 +++$+++ Titoxd +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-25 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.151248980E09 +++$+++ Well, I haven't looked at the changes, but I'll have a look at them now. Have fun on your trip, and relax!  +++$+++ Well, I haven't looked at the changes, but I'll have a look at them now. Have fun on your trip, and relax! [[User:Titoxd|Tito]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:#008000;">xd</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Titoxd|?!?]])</sup> 08:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
12017 +++$+++ Titoxd +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12016 +++$+++ 12016 +++$+++ 2006-07-18 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.153220220E09 +++$+++ Well, welcome back! <tt>:)<\/tt> By the way, I did a few commits to CVS, in case you want to check those out.  +++$+++ : Well, welcome back! <tt>:)</tt> By the way, I did a few commits to CVS, in case you want to check those out. [[User:Titoxd|Tito]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:#008000;">xd</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Titoxd|?!?]])</sup> 03:57, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
12018 +++$+++ Titoxd +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12016 +++$+++ 12017 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.154614260E09 +++$+++ Sure, no problem. I also fixed the log parser, and will try do as much as I can about internationalization. Have fun! <tt>:)<\/tt>  +++$+++ :: Sure, no problem. I also fixed the log parser, and will try do as much as I can about internationalization. Have fun! <tt>:)</tt> [[User:Titoxd|Tito]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:#008000;">xd</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Titoxd|?!?]])</sup> 07:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
12019 +++$+++ Cyclone1 +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12016 +++$+++ 12016 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.154307360E09 +++$+++ Compared to the current>>> <span style=\"font-size:100%;\"><font color=\"darkblue\"> +++$+++ :Compared to the current>>> <span style="font-size:100%;"><font color="darkblue">[[User:Cyclone1|'''''→Cycl''''']]</font></span><span style="font-size:110%;"><font color="steelblue">[[User talk:Cyclone1|'''''one1''''']]</font>'''''→'''''</span> 17:56, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
12020 +++$+++ Cyclone1 +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12016 +++$+++ 12016 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.154314740E09 +++$+++ Yea that works better, but what's wrong with my current signature? <span style=\"font-size:100%;\"><font color=\"darkblue\"> +++$+++ :Yea that works better, but what's wrong with my current signature? <span style="font-size:100%;"><font color="darkblue">[[User:Cyclone1|'''''→Cycl''''']]</font></span><span style="font-size:110%;"><font color="steelblue">[[User talk:Cyclone1|'''''one1''''']]</font>'''''→'''''</span> 19:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
12021 +++$+++ Cyclone1 +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12016 +++$+++ 12020 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.154315760E09 +++$+++ If it doesn't bother me and it doesn't bother you, I'd say there's no need in fixing something that isn't broken. I'll change it when someone says \"Hey man, I hate your freakin' long code so change it!\" Lol. Thanx anyway, though. <span style=\"font-size:100%;\"><font color=\"darkblue\"> +++$+++ ::If it doesn't bother me and it doesn't bother you, I'd say there's no need in fixing something that isn't broken. I'll change it when someone says "Hey man, I hate your freakin' long code so change it!" Lol. Thanx anyway, though. <span style="font-size:100%;"><font color="darkblue">[[User:Cyclone1|'''''→Cycl''''']]</font></span><span style="font-size:110%;"><font color="steelblue">[[User talk:Cyclone1|'''''one1''''']]</font>'''''→'''''</span> 20:16, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

274163 +++$+++ Mike Reardon +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-07 12:56:00 +++$+++ 1.191786960E09 +++$+++ It seems that these editors would rather dispute the credibility of this article rather than have legitimate information available, if some of it is negative. This article does not deserve the POV tag, especialy when editors refuse to discuss or defend their position. +++$+++ It seems that these editors would rather dispute the credibility of this article rather than have legitimate information available, if some of it is negative. This article does not deserve the POV tag, especialy when editors refuse to discuss or defend their position.[[User:Mike Reardon|Mike Reardon]] 12:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
274164 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274163 +++$+++ 274163 +++$+++ 2007-10-07 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.191790080E09 +++$+++ Finally, please note that you have removed the POV tag three times now in the last few hours. If you revert them one more time you will be blocked for 3RR violation. I am going to leave a warning message on your talk page as well, because I don't want you violating 3RR and then claiming that you didn't know about that rule. I ask you to leave the tags in place until there is a natural consensus. Please allow someone else to remove the POV tag if they are in agreement that the POV issues have been resolved in the current version of the article.'''If you violate 3RR your account will be blocked.'''  +++$+++ :Finally, please note that you have removed the POV tag three times now in the last few hours. If you revert them one more time you will be blocked for 3RR violation. I am going to leave a warning message on your talk page as well, because I don't want you violating 3RR and then claiming that you didn't know about that rule. I ask you to leave the tags in place until there is a natural consensus. Please allow someone else to remove the POV tag if they are in agreement that the POV issues have been resolved in the current version of the article.'''If you violate 3RR your account will be blocked.''' [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

274165 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274165 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-07 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.191825720E09 +++$+++ Do you have a moment? -  +++$+++ Do you have a moment? - [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]]  <sup>[[User_talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 23:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
274166 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274165 +++$+++ 274165 +++$+++ 2007-10-07 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.191825900E09 +++$+++ Sure, I can jump on gtalk in about half an hour? I'm just heading out for a moment right now, but I shouldn't be long and will see if you're around when I get back. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Sure, I can jump on gtalk in about half an hour? I'm just heading out for a moment right now, but I shouldn't be long and will see if you're around when I get back. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 23:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
274167 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274165 +++$+++ 274166 +++$+++ 2007-10-07 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.191826080E09 +++$+++ Yes, thanks.-  +++$+++ ::Yes, thanks.- [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]]  <sup>[[User_talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 23:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

12023 +++$+++ A Man In Black +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-01 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.154438460E09 +++$+++ While it wasn't a bad idea to leave a note there, the SEEKRIT IRC CABAL is working on damage control for this, including removing all the older comments. I don't want to step on your toes, but I did remove your comment. -  +++$+++ While it wasn't a bad idea to leave a note there, the SEEKRIT IRC CABAL is working on damage control for this, including removing all the older comments. I don't want to step on your toes, but I did remove your comment. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <font color="black">'''Bl♟ck'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] | [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 06:21, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
12024 +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12023 +++$+++ 12023 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.154440380E09 +++$+++ Hmm, I'm not certain I understand what damage there is to be controlled, but okay, if you feel the comment would inhibit anything.  Thanks for leaving a message. Happy editing! \u2014 +++$+++ : Hmm, I'm not certain I understand what damage there is to be controlled, but okay, if you feel the comment would inhibit anything.  Thanks for leaving a message. Happy editing! —[[User:AySz88|AySz88]][[Special:Contributions/AySz88|\]][[User talk:AySz88|<font color="#FF9966">^</font><font color="#FF6633">-</font><font color="#FF3300">^</font>]] 06:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
12025 +++$+++ MPS +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12023 +++$+++ 12024 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.154479560E09 +++$+++ Also, as a little feedback for you... your note to me did not sound as nice as you think it did. It sounded like you were threatening 3RR. Be nice, I am trying to help. Peace,  +++$+++ :: Also, as a little feedback for you... your note to me did not sound as nice as you think it did. It sounded like you were threatening 3RR. Be nice, I am trying to help. Peace, [[User:MPS|MPS]] 17:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

274168 +++$+++ Sennen goroshi +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-07 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.191757620E09 +++$+++ for removing the vandalism on my talk page - one question - is it possible to semi-protect a talk page, as I assume it is all freshly created accts that are responsible for the vandalism? +++$+++ for removing the vandalism on my talk page - one question - is it possible to semi-protect a talk page, as I assume it is all freshly created accts that are responsible for the vandalism?[[User:Sennen goroshi|Sennen goroshi]] 04:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
274169 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274168 +++$+++ 274168 +++$+++ 2007-10-07 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191757860E09 +++$+++ Sure, I can sprot it for a while. Say a week? And then we can extend it if necessary. I also blocked that account and I checked the other account but it had already been blocked by someone.  +++$+++ :Sure, I can sprot it for a while. Say a week? And then we can extend it if necessary. I also blocked that account and I checked the other account but it had already been blocked by someone. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
274170 +++$+++ Sennen goroshi +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274168 +++$+++ 274169 +++$+++ 2007-10-07 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.191759300E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I guess I should apologise - I imagine some of my edits, that might be seen as pro-Japanese were the catalyst for this vandalism. It is an annoying situation, because due to my edits, and the vandal's childish attitude, admins such as yourself are constantly having to RV and protect my pages. I'm sorry for making work for you. One small thought in the back of my mind....I have a slight suspicion that the vandal might be the user who was accusing the admin Gogo Dodo, or at least one of that admins cohorts - is it rude of me to go to the checkuser section and request a checkuser, comparing the IDs\/IPs that vandalised my acct to a couple of IDs that I have had heated debates with? I feel bad about this, because I only have a suspicion, no concrete evidence....what do you think? +++$+++ :: Thank you, I guess I should apologise - I imagine some of my edits, that might be seen as pro-Japanese were the catalyst for this vandalism. It is an annoying situation, because due to my edits, and the vandal's childish attitude, admins such as yourself are constantly having to RV and protect my pages. I'm sorry for making work for you. One small thought in the back of my mind....I have a slight suspicion that the vandal might be the user who was accusing the admin Gogo Dodo, or at least one of that admins cohorts - is it rude of me to go to the checkuser section and request a checkuser, comparing the IDs/IPs that vandalised my acct to a couple of IDs that I have had heated debates with? I feel bad about this, because I only have a suspicion, no concrete evidence....what do you think?[[User:Sennen goroshi|Sennen goroshi]] 05:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
274171 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274168 +++$+++ 274170 +++$+++ 2007-10-07 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.191825540E09 +++$+++ No problems. To be honest, I have no idea about the disputes you've involved in and various editors involved, so I can't really comment about that but there is nothing rude or bad about filing a RFCU request if you think it might help. I don't really understand what you mean by, \"I have a slight suspicion that the vandal might be the user who was accusing the admin Gogo Dodo, or at least one of that admins cohorts\"? Are you saying you think one of Gogo's friends has something to do with it? If that is what you are mean, I can assure it is not the case. Gogo is a good person and would not be involved with something like that or even be friends with the type of people who would do that. Anyway, let me know in a week if you feel you'd like the s-prot to be extended on your talk page. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::No problems. To be honest, I have no idea about the disputes you've involved in and various editors involved, so I can't really comment about that but there is nothing rude or bad about filing a RFCU request if you think it might help. I don't really understand what you mean by, "I have a slight suspicion that the vandal might be the user who was accusing the admin Gogo Dodo, or at least one of that admins cohorts"? Are you saying you think one of Gogo's friends has something to do with it? If that is what you are mean, I can assure it is not the case. Gogo is a good person and would not be involved with something like that or even be friends with the type of people who would do that. Anyway, let me know in a week if you feel you'd like the s-prot to be extended on your talk page. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 23:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
274172 +++$+++ Sennen goroshi +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274168 +++$+++ 274171 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.191852120E09 +++$+++ No, we are are getting things round the wrong way. While I have never had any contact with Gogo Dodo, I will take your word for it that he is one of the good guys (the fact that he is an admin, points to that as well) What I was getting at, was that someone made a claim that about 10 different people were sock puppets\/masters - infact I was accused of being the sockpuppet master of Gogo Dodo...LOL  - that would be a pretty good achievement, having an established admin as your sock puppet. LOL.   What I was suspicous about, was that the person accusing me of being a master, who also accused Gogo Dodo of being a puppet, might be the person who was also vandalising my user\/talk pages +++$+++ :::: No, we are are getting things round the wrong way. While I have never had any contact with Gogo Dodo, I will take your word for it that he is one of the good guys (the fact that he is an admin, points to that as well) What I was getting at, was that someone made a claim that about 10 different people were sock puppets/masters - infact I was accused of being the sockpuppet master of Gogo Dodo...LOL  - that would be a pretty good achievement, having an established admin as your sock puppet. LOL.   What I was suspicous about, was that the person accusing me of being a master, who also accused Gogo Dodo of being a puppet, might be the person who was also vandalising my user/talk pages[[User:Sennen goroshi|Sennen goroshi]] 07:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

12026 +++$+++ Hello32020 +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12026 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.156844760E09 +++$+++ Hope it comes back soon. If not good night!  +++$+++ Hope it comes back soon. If not good night! [[User:Hello32020|Hello32020]] 02:46, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
12027 +++$+++ John Reid +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12026 +++$+++ 12026 +++$+++ 2006-09-03 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.157282940E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/delete&page=Template:User_Nogus]  +++$+++ * [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Template:User_Nogus] [[User:John Reid|John&nbsp;]][[User talk:John Reid|Reid]] 04:29, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

274173 +++$+++ Strothra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-07 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.191825780E09 +++$+++ You might want to check out the ongoing NPOV dispute here. Actually, it's more than just a POV dispute. It's ultimately coming down to an annoying edit war without any outside opinions. I'd take the issue to [[WP:3O]], but there are IPs occasionally getting involved. However, I'm not sure if the IPs are the same editor as the registered user or not so maybe it is a place for [[WP:3O]]. All I know is that everything was quiet with this article until contentious edits were made and then all of a sudden a number of IPs started popping in to edit. Anyway, any opinions you have are always welcome. -- +++$+++ You might want to check out the ongoing NPOV dispute here. Actually, it's more than just a POV dispute. It's ultimately coming down to an annoying edit war without any outside opinions. I'd take the issue to [[WP:3O]], but there are IPs occasionally getting involved. However, I'm not sure if the IPs are the same editor as the registered user or not so maybe it is a place for [[WP:3O]]. All I know is that everything was quiet with this article until contentious edits were made and then all of a sudden a number of IPs started popping in to edit. Anyway, any opinions you have are always welcome. --[[User:Strothra|Strothra]] 23:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
274174 +++$+++ Strothra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274173 +++$+++ 274173 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.191826920E09 +++$+++ I don't neccesarily think so, but you do think Ottawaman could be back? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets\/Ottawaman][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Michael_Ignatieff&action=history] -- +++$+++ :I don't neccesarily think so, but you do think Ottawaman could be back? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Ottawaman][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Ignatieff&action=history] --[[User:Strothra|Strothra]] 00:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
274175 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274173 +++$+++ 274174 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.191830580E09 +++$+++ Hey Strothra, I'm really not sure, but it wouldn't surprise me if he does come back if and when he thinks he can get away with it. The person who wrote the edits I reverted seems to like using unreliable sources like forums, blogs and so forth, which, of course, is something that Ottawaman used to like doing as well, but then I guess it's also something that newbies do when they aren't familiar with our reliable sources, BLP and verifiability policies. Those IPs seem to be on different ISPs, though, and in different parts of Canada, so I don't if they are the same person using proxies or something or if it's several different people. Which was the user account you're talking about? Do you mean User:GoldDragon? I'll try to help keep an eye on the situation, but feel free to give me a yell anytime if you need to. I can always protect the page if it becomes necessary; that might prompt them to be more conciliatory about their edits. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Hey Strothra, I'm really not sure, but it wouldn't surprise me if he does come back if and when he thinks he can get away with it. The person who wrote the edits I reverted seems to like using unreliable sources like forums, blogs and so forth, which, of course, is something that Ottawaman used to like doing as well, but then I guess it's also something that newbies do when they aren't familiar with our reliable sources, BLP and verifiability policies. Those IPs seem to be on different ISPs, though, and in different parts of Canada, so I don't if they are the same person using proxies or something or if it's several different people. Which was the user account you're talking about? Do you mean User:GoldDragon? I'll try to help keep an eye on the situation, but feel free to give me a yell anytime if you need to. I can always protect the page if it becomes necessary; that might prompt them to be more conciliatory about their edits. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:03, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
274176 +++$+++ Strothra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274173 +++$+++ 274175 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.191832140E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that's who I was referring to.  The IPs didn't to be in the same ranges, so I was doubtful about the chances of it being a return of Ottawaman.  Thanks for looking into the article though.  Best, -- +++$+++ :::Yeah, that's who I was referring to.  The IPs didn't to be in the same ranges, so I was doubtful about the chances of it being a return of Ottawaman.  Thanks for looking into the article though.  Best, --[[User:Strothra|Strothra]] 01:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
274177 +++$+++ GoldDragon +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274173 +++$+++ 274176 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.191888180E09 +++$+++ Though it is better if the anon IP used the media sources directly, the blog is really a collection of the media sources rather than an opinion piece. So its best not to consider this an attack edit. Plus, information on campaign advisers and financing is legitimate.  +++$+++ ::::Though it is better if the anon IP used the media sources directly, the blog is really a collection of the media sources rather than an opinion piece. So its best not to consider this an attack edit. Plus, information on campaign advisers and financing is legitimate. [[User:GoldDragon|GoldDragon]] 17:03, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

12031 +++$+++ Andypandy.UK +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-15 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.160969640E09 +++$+++ --<font style=\"background:white\"> +++$+++ --<font style="background:white">[[User:Andypandy.UK|Andeh]]</font> 20:34, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
12032 +++$+++ The Raven's Apprentice +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12031 +++$+++ 12031 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.161033480E09 +++$+++ Actually, the principle I'm working on is one from \"English implementation features#After the Migration:<br>\"<<Non-Babel userboxes are to be removed from Wikipedia:Userboxes.[?]>> It should be updated to inform users that non-Babel userboxes should only be created in userspace or an appropriate subpage, such as a corresponding WikiProject.\" Cheers,  +++$+++ :Actually, the principle I'm working on is one from "English implementation features#After the Migration:<br>"<<Non-Babel userboxes are to be removed from Wikipedia:Userboxes.[?]>> It should be updated to inform users that non-Babel userboxes should only be created in userspace or an appropriate subpage, such as a corresponding WikiProject." Cheers, [[User:The Raven's Apprentice|<font color="#4169E1">The Raven's Apprentice</font>]] <sup>([[User Talk:The Raven's Apprentice|Talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/The Raven's Apprentice|Contribs]])</sup> 14:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

536320 +++$+++ Dbachmann +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.171824840E09 +++$+++ What is the difference between a \"chatpage\" and a talkpage? I find that too much time is wasted with idle chatter on ''talk'' pages already. If you want to move the article, you should make a proposal on talk, preferably after familiarizing yourself with the topic. If you find I am in violation of OWN, you should take up the matter with me directly, and failing that, open a user conduct RfC. If I \"OWNed\" the article in any way, it would have been cleaned up months ago. But since I recognize that the article cannot be \"owned\", it will probably remain broken indefinitely. The policy in question is [[WP:UNDUE]]. I am well aware of scholarly mainstream opinion on the matter. The article is under constant attack from editors who either cannot understand or do not want to respect WP's principle of [[WP:NPOV]] means that views are presented in proportion to their  academic notability. I realize that the topic is not ''only'' academic, and that it plays an unfortunate role in Indian religious nationalist propaganda. This is why we have [[Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies)]] which has the sole purpose of documenting the political side of the topic. We do get an endless influx of Hindu propagandist editors bent on misrepresenting academic opinion. WIN is just a comparatively harmless example of these. The only thing that stands between these editors and a Wikipedia that is instrumentalised for political propaganda is Wikipedia policy and the investment of editors ready to engage in anti-propaganda vigilantism. I am prepared to discuss with anyone who brings up clean academic references in good faith. I am not prepared, nor am I obliged by Wikipedia policy, to discuss anything else. regards,  +++$+++ What is the difference between a "chatpage" and a talkpage? I find that too much time is wasted with idle chatter on ''talk'' pages already. If you want to move the article, you should make a proposal on talk, preferably after familiarizing yourself with the topic. If you find I am in violation of OWN, you should take up the matter with me directly, and failing that, open a user conduct RfC. If I "OWNed" the article in any way, it would have been cleaned up months ago. But since I recognize that the article cannot be "owned", it will probably remain broken indefinitely. The policy in question is [[WP:UNDUE]]. I am well aware of scholarly mainstream opinion on the matter. The article is under constant attack from editors who either cannot understand or do not want to respect WP's principle of [[WP:NPOV]] means that views are presented in proportion to their  academic notability. I realize that the topic is not ''only'' academic, and that it plays an unfortunate role in Indian religious nationalist propaganda. This is why we have [[Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies)]] which has the sole purpose of documenting the political side of the topic. We do get an endless influx of Hindu propagandist editors bent on misrepresenting academic opinion. WIN is just a comparatively harmless example of these. The only thing that stands between these editors and a Wikipedia that is instrumentalised for political propaganda is Wikipedia policy and the investment of editors ready to engage in anti-propaganda vigilantism. I am prepared to discuss with anyone who brings up clean academic references in good faith. I am not prepared, nor am I obliged by Wikipedia policy, to discuss anything else. regards, [[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|(�)]]</small> 10:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
536321 +++$+++ Rayfield +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536320 +++$+++ 536320 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.172885340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for having tried to mediate between the different parties at the [[Indo-Aryan migration]] article. Even if the results may not have been spectacular, it was a praiseworthy and good effort. Thanks. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for having tried to mediate between the different parties at the [[Indo-Aryan migration]] article. Even if the results may not have been spectacular, it was a praiseworthy and good effort. Thanks. --[[User:Rayfield|RF]] 17:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

541601 +++$+++ CliffC +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-30 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.191205980E09 +++$+++ I know page blanking raises a red flag, it does to me too, but I blanked that talk page trying to remove an anon's trollish comment (\"Not a very notable event\") about the shooting.  'Undo' apparently doesn't work if there's only one entry in the history, and in trying to work around that I removed the comment manually and neglected to leave an edit summary, which certainly does look de facto vandal-ish.  Sorry about that.  Cheers,  +++$+++ I know page blanking raises a red flag, it does to me too, but I blanked that talk page trying to remove an anon's trollish comment ("Not a very notable event") about the shooting.  'Undo' apparently doesn't work if there's only one entry in the history, and in trying to work around that I removed the comment manually and neglected to leave an edit summary, which certainly does look de facto vandal-ish.  Sorry about that.  Cheers, [[User:CliffC|CliffC]] 19:33, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
541602 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541601 +++$+++ 541601 +++$+++ 2007-09-30 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.191209040E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I know it's a weird gray area.  I didn't think your blanking was vandalism, but I do also feel comments have to be pretty far beyond the pale of trollism and vandalism before they should be removed from talk pages.   +++$+++ :Yeah, I know it's a weird gray area.  I didn't think your blanking was vandalism, but I do also feel comments have to be pretty far beyond the pale of trollism and vandalism before they should be removed from talk pages.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 20:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

536323 +++$+++ Ral315 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536323 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.172021460E09 +++$+++ All stories are due around 17:00 UTC every Monday.  If you'd like to take a stab at it, that'd be great; let me know if you have any further questions, or if you need help with your story.  I'm not around much on the weekends, but I'll try to keep an eye on my talk page.   +++$+++ All stories are due around 17:00 UTC every Monday.  If you'd like to take a stab at it, that'd be great; let me know if you have any further questions, or if you need help with your story.  I'm not around much on the weekends, but I'll try to keep an eye on my talk page.  [[User:Ral315|Ral315]] [[User talk:Ral315|»]] 17:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
536324 +++$+++ Ral315 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536323 +++$+++ 536323 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.172855940E09 +++$+++ All right, that sounds good.  Report anything you're going to write to the [[WP:POST\/N\/O|newsroom]].  Thanks a lot.   +++$+++ : All right, that sounds good.  Report anything you're going to write to the [[WP:POST/N/O|newsroom]].  Thanks a lot.  [[User:Ral315|Ral315]] [[User talk:Ral315|»]] 09:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

12036 +++$+++ Radiant! +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12036 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-10 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.163178120E09 +++$+++ I've added the notice of inactivity to the \"hatnotes\" proposal simply because it appeared to be inactive, judging by the lack of recent edits to the page and its talk page, and because it wasn't obvious whether there was consensus for it. Indeed, since I did so two months ago and you seem to be the first one to notice, I'd say this assessment was probably correct. That is not to say it's not a worthwhile proposal, because it looks useful, but it could use more community feedback. Thus, if you are interested in having a guideline on hatnotes, I'd recommend advertising this proposal (e.g. [[WP:VP|here]]) to get feedback. HTH!  +++$+++ I've added the notice of inactivity to the "hatnotes" proposal simply because it appeared to be inactive, judging by the lack of recent edits to the page and its talk page, and because it wasn't obvious whether there was consensus for it. Indeed, since I did so two months ago and you seem to be the first one to notice, I'd say this assessment was probably correct. That is not to say it's not a worthwhile proposal, because it looks useful, but it could use more community feedback. Thus, if you are interested in having a guideline on hatnotes, I'd recommend advertising this proposal (e.g. [[WP:VP|here]]) to get feedback. HTH! [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#DD0000">&gt;<font color="#FF6600">R<font color="#FF9900">a<font color="#FFCC00">d<font color="#FFEE00">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 09:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
12037 +++$+++ Radiant! +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12036 +++$+++ 12036 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.163202420E09 +++$+++ To my knowledge it has never been a guideline (indeed, the previous tag was {{tl|proposal}}). I would have no objection to it being added to the MOS, though. ( +++$+++ *To my knowledge it has never been a guideline (indeed, the previous tag was {{tl|proposal}}). I would have no objection to it being added to the MOS, though. ([[User_talk:Radiant!|<font color="orange">Radiant</font>]]) 15:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

12038 +++$+++ Sbharris +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-13 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.163482320E09 +++$+++ I see you're removing some of my links in this article to technical terms like [[invariant mass]] and [[COM frame]]. Now, I agree that such things perhaps shouldn't be linked EVERY time they occur, but once per paragraph (or even per page) of the same term, is far better than once per article. In a long article, it's entirely possible to miss the first use of a technical term, and therefore be glad for a \"fairly close\" link so you don't have to go back and search for it. Nor do I believe that one link per paragraph or per page, hurts readability. Are you opperating on any guidelines for this? [[User:Sbharris|<font color=\"blue\">S<\/font>]][[User:Sbharris|<font color=\"orange\">B<\/font>]][[User:Sbharris|H]] +++$+++ I see you're removing some of my links in this article to technical terms like [[invariant mass]] and [[COM frame]]. Now, I agree that such things perhaps shouldn't be linked EVERY time they occur, but once per paragraph (or even per page) of the same term, is far better than once per article. In a long article, it's entirely possible to miss the first use of a technical term, and therefore be glad for a "fairly close" link so you don't have to go back and search for it. Nor do I believe that one link per paragraph or per page, hurts readability. Are you opperating on any guidelines for this? [[User:Sbharris|<font color="blue">S</font>]][[User:Sbharris|<font color="orange">B</font>]][[User:Sbharris|H]][[User:Sbharris|arris]] 21:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
12039 +++$+++ Sbharris +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12038 +++$+++ 12038 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.163495940E09 +++$+++ I like your general middle of the road suggestion of one link per particular tech phrase per section per article. I've actually gone to the style manual and proposed it as a policy (giving you credit), on the TALK page. Thanks. [[User:Sbharris|<font color=\"blue\">S<\/font>]][[User:Sbharris|<font color=\"orange\">B<\/font>]][[User:Sbharris|H]] +++$+++ :I like your general middle of the road suggestion of one link per particular tech phrase per section per article. I've actually gone to the style manual and proposed it as a policy (giving you credit), on the TALK page. Thanks. [[User:Sbharris|<font color="blue">S</font>]][[User:Sbharris|<font color="orange">B</font>]][[User:Sbharris|H]][[User:Sbharris|arris]] 01:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

536327 +++$+++ Mgunn +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536327 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-24 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.172329560E09 +++$+++ This is obvious LaRouche puffery, and the references don't even get close to justifying the claim. (You could not say \"David Duke is highly regarded in the U.S.\" and then cite some nutty David Duke supporter that says he is a leading US politician.)  Furthermore, the first citation is from LaRouche material (suspect, especially given the outcome of the previous LaRouche arbcom case) and the second citation simply doesn't say what LaRouche supporters say it says.  --  +++$+++ This is obvious LaRouche puffery, and the references don't even get close to justifying the claim. (You could not say "David Duke is highly regarded in the U.S." and then cite some nutty David Duke supporter that says he is a leading US politician.)  Furthermore, the first citation is from LaRouche material (suspect, especially given the outcome of the previous LaRouche arbcom case) and the second citation simply doesn't say what LaRouche supporters say it says.  -- [[User:Mgunn|Mgunn]] 07:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
536328 +++$+++ Mgunn +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536327 +++$+++ 536327 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.172546640E09 +++$+++ I think, if you read the discussions surrounding this one edit, I think it will give you a good feel on the overall nature of the disputes.  --  +++$+++ :I think, if you read the discussions surrounding this one edit, I think it will give you a good feel on the overall nature of the disputes.  -- [[User:Mgunn|Mgunn]] 19:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
536329 +++$+++ Dking +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536327 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.172636040E09 +++$+++ In the above quoted statement I invited the LaRouchians to present documentation to prove that a single political person of real influence has bought into LaRouche's ideology. In the three months since I made that invitation, they have not presented a single example in China, Russia or anywhere else.-- +++$+++ ::::In the above quoted statement I invited the LaRouchians to present documentation to prove that a single political person of real influence has bought into LaRouche's ideology. In the three months since I made that invitation, they have not presented a single example in China, Russia or anywhere else.--[[User:Dking|Dking]] 20:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

274184 +++$+++ Bagel7 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-05 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.191580800E09 +++$+++ Ok, Ok you caught me on the whole copyright thing. But there were disparaging comments? Really??? I tried to look at what I had written [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=User%3ABagel7%2FSecret] but I couldn't see what it was. Can you please tell me what the disparaging comments were? -  +++$+++ Ok, Ok you caught me on the whole copyright thing. But there were disparaging comments? Really??? I tried to look at what I had written [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=User%3ABagel7%2FSecret] but I couldn't see what it was. Can you please tell me what the disparaging comments were? - [[User:Bagel7|<span style="background:black"><font color="lightgreen">Bagel7</font></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Bagel7|<span style="background:black"><font color="lightgreen">T's</font></span>]]</sup> 03:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
274185 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274184 +++$+++ 274184 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.191581280E09 +++$+++ Nope, if you've forgotten, then great, I'm not going to remind you of what was on that page. You can't see it because I deleted it. Please don't misuse your userspace in that way again. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Nope, if you've forgotten, then great, I'm not going to remind you of what was on that page. You can't see it because I deleted it. Please don't misuse your userspace in that way again. Thanks, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

89388 +++$+++ RifeIdeas +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-06 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.291698240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reference, I am from the Waterloo area and patrol the cite. There is now a discussion going on at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities\/US Guideline#References for Notable people]] due to an editor inserting the {{tl|unsourced section}} into the Waterloo Notable people section a few days ago. My question is since it is a book and not a website I can check, does it cite the connection to Waterloo and not just Notability (the disagreement with the now used tag). I think it probably does but I want to verify. If it does just leave the reference and I will accept it as verified, if not please remove it Thanks-- +++$+++ Thanks for your reference, I am from the Waterloo area and patrol the cite. There is now a discussion going on at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline#References for Notable people]] due to an editor inserting the {{tl|unsourced section}} into the Waterloo Notable people section a few days ago. My question is since it is a book and not a website I can check, does it cite the connection to Waterloo and not just Notability (the disagreement with the now used tag). I think it probably does but I want to verify. If it does just leave the reference and I will accept it as verified, if not please remove it Thanks--[[User:RifeIdeas|'''''<font face="Verdana"><font color="DarkGreen">Rife</font><font color="orange">Ideas </font>''''']][[User talk:RifeIdeas|'''Talk ''']]</font> 21:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
89389 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89388 +++$+++ 89388 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.291708860E09 +++$+++ I was unaware of this dispute, and had assumed the issue was primarily the notability of the individuals named (and I was annoyed for this reason, since a bluelink on Wikipedia may be taken as evidence of notability, at least until the article to which it links has been challenged and deleted). My addition of the book in question was a mechanical matter of transferring the reference from the article on the Sullivan Brothers, and it certainly does verify they were from Waterloo. The fact it is a book and not an online source should not prevent anyone from confirming this, since Amazon.com offers a preview of it.\u2014 +++$+++ :I was unaware of this dispute, and had assumed the issue was primarily the notability of the individuals named (and I was annoyed for this reason, since a bluelink on Wikipedia may be taken as evidence of notability, at least until the article to which it links has been challenged and deleted). My addition of the book in question was a mechanical matter of transferring the reference from the article on the Sullivan Brothers, and it certainly does verify they were from Waterloo. The fact it is a book and not an online source should not prevent anyone from confirming this, since Amazon.com offers a preview of it.—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 00:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
89390 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89388 +++$+++ 89388 +++$+++ 2010-12-08 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.291859520E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  17:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

274186 +++$+++ Strothra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-17 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.192621500E09 +++$+++ I recently nominated [[Ahwaz territory]] for AfD, but then the creator of the article deleted it and redirected it to [[Ahwaz Region]], but removed the AfD tag.  I have no idea how to handle that, since the AfD tag seems to now need to be placed on both the territory and the region articles. Can you spare a moment? -- +++$+++ I recently nominated [[Ahwaz territory]] for AfD, but then the creator of the article deleted it and redirected it to [[Ahwaz Region]], but removed the AfD tag.  I have no idea how to handle that, since the AfD tag seems to now need to be placed on both the territory and the region articles. Can you spare a moment? --[[User:Strothra|Strothra]] 04:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
274187 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274186 +++$+++ 274186 +++$+++ 2007-10-17 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.192622460E09 +++$+++ I restored the AfD tag and speedied the other version as a cut and paste fork. If it needs to be renamed, it should be moved properly rather than a cut and paste move.  +++$+++ :I restored the AfD tag and speedied the other version as a cut and paste fork. If it needs to be renamed, it should be moved properly rather than a cut and paste move. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
274188 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274186 +++$+++ 274186 +++$+++ 2007-10-17 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.192625220E09 +++$+++ Please stop blanking AFD tags and attempting to bypass the AFD by doing a cut and paste fork to a new name. I've deleted that fork again and protected the name until the AFD concludes. You have blanked out the AfD tags one way or another at least five times, if you continue doing this, I will block your account from editing. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Please stop blanking AFD tags and attempting to bypass the AFD by doing a cut and paste fork to a new name. I've deleted that fork again and protected the name until the AFD concludes. You have blanked out the AfD tags one way or another at least five times, if you continue doing this, I will block your account from editing. Thanks, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

12045 +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12045 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-05 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.173117420E09 +++$+++ Which text book are you referring to in the edit summary of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=QR_decomposition&curid=305223&diff=112748059&oldid=106429478 your edit] to [[QR decomposition]], which is \"rv anon change from while ago - my textbook says same sign\". Of the two textbooks that I consulted, one (Stoer & Bulirsch, Introduction to Numerical Analysis) says opposite sign, and the other (Golub & Van Loan, Matrix Computations) recommends using the same sign, but they add a trick to get rid of the cancellation. --  +++$+++ Which text book are you referring to in the edit summary of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=QR_decomposition&curid=305223&diff=112748059&oldid=106429478 your edit] to [[QR decomposition]], which is "rv anon change from while ago - my textbook says same sign". Of the two textbooks that I consulted, one (Stoer & Bulirsch, Introduction to Numerical Analysis) says opposite sign, and the other (Golub & Van Loan, Matrix Computations) recommends using the same sign, but they add a trick to get rid of the cancellation. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] ([[User talk:Jitse Niesen|talk]]) 09:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
12046 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12045 +++$+++ 12045 +++$+++ 2007-12-16 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.197863640E09 +++$+++ Hey, I'm glad to see you're still interested in the project. Are you still interested in contributing as well? The project hasn't seen much activity lately, and any work to any article would be appreciated. -- +++$+++ :Hey, I'm glad to see you're still interested in the project. Are you still interested in contributing as well? The project hasn't seen much activity lately, and any work to any article would be appreciated. --[[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 19:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
12047 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ AySz88 +++$+++ 12045 +++$+++ 12046 +++$+++ 2007-12-16 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.197865020E09 +++$+++ That's cool. Do you think, if you had time, that you'd be able to give any of the hurricane articles on FAC or FLC a look at ([[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones\/Noticeboard|here]]? -- +++$+++ ::That's cool. Do you think, if you had time, that you'd be able to give any of the hurricane articles on FAC or FLC a look at ([[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Noticeboard|here]]? --[[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 20:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

445582 +++$+++ Epipelagic +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ 445582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-26 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.309122540E09 +++$+++ Ah indeed, I'm well aware it is not long enough. I plonked it on DYK assuming I would add the necessary content in short time. But other events interceded, some of which you may have noticed. I might be able to pad it appropriately over the next day or two, and I would appreciate it if you check back to see if I managed that. -- +++$+++ Ah indeed, I'm well aware it is not long enough. I plonked it on DYK assuming I would add the necessary content in short time. But other events interceded, some of which you may have noticed. I might be able to pad it appropriately over the next day or two, and I would appreciate it if you check back to see if I managed that. --[[User:Epipelagic|Epipelagic]] ([[User talk:Epipelagic|talk]]) 14:09, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
445583 +++$+++ Epipelagic +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ 445582 +++$+++ 445582 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.309123440E09 +++$+++ No, on second thoughts wipe that. It's mostly within the tables that I want to add content (who decided tables don't count?) -- +++$+++ :No, on second thoughts wipe that. It's mostly within the tables that I want to add content (who decided tables don't count?) --[[User:Epipelagic|Epipelagic]] ([[User talk:Epipelagic|talk]]) 14:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
445584 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ 445582 +++$+++ 445583 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.309123920E09 +++$+++ [[WP:WIADYK]] #2 \"Articles must have a minimum of 1,500 characters of prose (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and '''tables''' etc.)\". I agree it is a bit stupid sometimes - maybe if there is sufficient prose inside the table then we can make an exception, but we'd have to see. (And yes I noticed the \"other events\", Viriditas @ 09:46 summed it up well.) Drop me a note if you think there might be enough text in the table to count. Cheers  +++$+++ ::[[WP:WIADYK]] #2 "Articles must have a minimum of 1,500 characters of prose (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and '''tables''' etc.)". I agree it is a bit stupid sometimes - maybe if there is sufficient prose inside the table then we can make an exception, but we'd have to see. (And yes I noticed the "other events", Viriditas @ 09:46 summed it up well.) Drop me a note if you think there might be enough text in the table to count. Cheers [[User:Smartse|SmartSE]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 14:32, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

482605 +++$+++ Dick107 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482605 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.174355280E09 +++$+++ Regarding the ongoing vadalism on the Warren G. Harding page (http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Warren_G._Harding), I noticed that you had reverted to a prior page by 'Schauft'. It would appear that 'Schauft' is doing some vandalism, himself. As shown in the history, I reverted to an earlier user and made some other cleanups.   +++$+++ Regarding the ongoing vadalism on the Warren G. Harding page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_G._Harding), I noticed that you had reverted to a prior page by 'Schauft'. It would appear that 'Schauft' is doing some vandalism, himself. As shown in the history, I reverted to an earlier user and made some other cleanups.  [[User:Dick107|Dick107]] 18:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
482606 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482605 +++$+++ 482605 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.174355640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pointing that out.  Schauft has been blocked indefinitely.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks for pointing that out.  Schauft has been blocked indefinitely.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 18:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
482607 +++$+++ Dick107 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482605 +++$+++ 482606 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.174362240E09 +++$+++ Glad to help. With the recent flurry of editing\/vandalism on that page, I was wondering if access to the article should be blocked but that is outside my decision area.   +++$+++ ::Glad to help. With the recent flurry of editing/vandalism on that page, I was wondering if access to the article should be blocked but that is outside my decision area.  [[User:Dick107|Dick107]] 20:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
482608 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482605 +++$+++ 482607 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.174426380E09 +++$+++ The vandalism on [[Warren G. Harding]] doesn't quite meet my threshold but it's close.  You could probably find an admin who would protect it though.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::The vandalism on [[Warren G. Harding]] doesn't quite meet my threshold but it's close.  You could probably find an admin who would protect it though.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 14:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

274193 +++$+++ 124.170.158.162 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-19 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.192790160E09 +++$+++ Can you have a look at the article and help? There is an edit conflict going on. It has been [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Hamid_Dabashi&diff=165484998&oldid=165429586 tagged] for POV check and peacock terms, but it seemed ok to me before a user added [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Hamid_Dabashi&diff=164717774&oldid=163774781 allegations of anti-semitism].  It has several relevant external links that are well organised and wikified, but someone [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Hamid_Dabashi&diff=165065671&oldid=165065362 keeps removing all of them]. Thanks.  +++$+++ Can you have a look at the article and help? There is an edit conflict going on. It has been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamid_Dabashi&diff=165484998&oldid=165429586 tagged] for POV check and peacock terms, but it seemed ok to me before a user added [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamid_Dabashi&diff=164717774&oldid=163774781 allegations of anti-semitism].  It has several relevant external links that are well organised and wikified, but someone [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamid_Dabashi&diff=165065671&oldid=165065362 keeps removing all of them]. Thanks. [[User:124.170.158.162|124.170.158.162]] 03:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
274194 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274193 +++$+++ 274193 +++$+++ 2007-10-19 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.192798560E09 +++$+++ Things seem to be settled at the moment. To be honest, I think there are too many links and too many publications. And I think the \"Selected bibliography\" is too extensive.  +++$+++ :Things seem to be settled at the moment. To be honest, I think there are too many links and too many publications. And I think the "Selected bibliography" is too extensive. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

567464 +++$+++ Steptrip +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-04 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.175753940E09 +++$+++ Admins really do need to place {{tl|indef}} on the page of the blocked user, in that case. &nbsp;'''[[Wikipedia:Editor review\/Steptrip_2|<font family=\"Trebuchet MS\" color=\"#D2691E\" size=\"2\">''~''<\/font>]]<font face=\"Vivaldi\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ Admins really do need to place {{tl|indef}} on the page of the blocked user, in that case. &nbsp;'''[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Steptrip_2|<font family="Trebuchet MS" color="#D2691E" size="2">''~''</font>]]<font face="Vivaldi" size="3">[[User:Steptrip|<font color="#FF0000">St</font><font color="#FFD700">ep</font>]] [[User talk:Steptrip|<font color="#7CFC00">tr</font><font color="#00FFFF">ip</font>]]</font>''' 23:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
567465 +++$+++ Steptrip +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567464 +++$+++ 567464 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.175757180E09 +++$+++ I know, and all of the users that I reported to AIV were indef blocked, thus requiring the {{tl|indefblockeduser}} template. &nbsp;'''[[Wikipedia:Editor review\/Steptrip_2|<font family=\"Trebuchet MS\" color=\"#D2691E\" size=\"2\">''~''<\/font>]]<font face=\"Vivaldi\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :I know, and all of the users that I reported to AIV were indef blocked, thus requiring the {{tl|indefblockeduser}} template. &nbsp;'''[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Steptrip_2|<font family="Trebuchet MS" color="#D2691E" size="2">''~''</font>]]<font face="Vivaldi" size="3">[[User:Steptrip|<font color="#FF0000">St</font><font color="#FFD700">ep</font>]] [[User talk:Steptrip|<font color="#7CFC00">tr</font><font color="#00FFFF">ip</font>]]</font>''' 00:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
567466 +++$+++ Steptrip +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567464 +++$+++ 567465 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.175758200E09 +++$+++ I don't mean to say that I want users who were blocked long ago to get the aforesaid template placed on their page now, however, I do mean to say that the template should have been on the page since the block. I hope this clears up the misunderstanding. &nbsp;'''[[Wikipedia:Editor review\/Steptrip_2|<font family=\"Trebuchet MS\" color=\"#D2691E\" size=\"2\">''~''<\/font>]]<font face=\"Vivaldi\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ ::I don't mean to say that I want users who were blocked long ago to get the aforesaid template placed on their page now, however, I do mean to say that the template should have been on the page since the block. I hope this clears up the misunderstanding. &nbsp;'''[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Steptrip_2|<font family="Trebuchet MS" color="#D2691E" size="2">''~''</font>]]<font face="Vivaldi" size="3">[[User:Steptrip|<font color="#FF0000">St</font><font color="#FFD700">ep</font>]] [[User talk:Steptrip|<font color="#7CFC00">tr</font><font color="#00FFFF">ip</font>]]</font>''' 00:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
567467 +++$+++ Steptrip +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567464 +++$+++ 567465 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.175760000E09 +++$+++ When I say \"users\", I am referring to the users whom I reported at [[WP:AI|AIV]] on the grounds of inflammatory Essjay username impersonation (i.e. the ones that started this conversation). &nbsp;'''[[Wikipedia:Editor review\/Steptrip_2|<font family=\"Trebuchet MS\" color=\"#D2691E\" size=\"2\">''~''<\/font>]]<font face=\"Vivaldi\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ ::When I say "users", I am referring to the users whom I reported at [[WP:AI|AIV]] on the grounds of inflammatory Essjay username impersonation (i.e. the ones that started this conversation). &nbsp;'''[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Steptrip_2|<font family="Trebuchet MS" color="#D2691E" size="2">''~''</font>]]<font face="Vivaldi" size="3">[[User:Steptrip|<font color="#FF0000">St</font><font color="#FFD700">ep</font>]] [[User talk:Steptrip|<font color="#7CFC00">tr</font><font color="#00FFFF">ip</font>]]</font>''' 01:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

536339 +++$+++ PER9000 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.174342080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:PER9000|PER9000]] 15:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
536340 +++$+++ HighInBC +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.174342320E09 +++$+++ Ok, this is also not the page to talk about Conservapedia, this is Wikipedia. [[WP:NOT]] also applies to talk pages. <small> +++$+++ ::Ok, this is also not the page to talk about Conservapedia, this is Wikipedia. [[WP:NOT]] also applies to talk pages. <small>[[User:HighInBC|<sup>High</sup><sub>InBC</sub>]]<sup>(Need help? [[User_talk:HighInBC|Ask me]])</sup></small> 15:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
536341 +++$+++ PER9000 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.174343400E09 +++$+++ HignInBC: I agree, sorry about that - I'll try to move this discussion elsewhere.  +++$+++ ::: HignInBC: I agree, sorry about that - I'll try to move this discussion elsewhere. [[User:PER9000|PER9000]] 15:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
536342 +++$+++ PER9000 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.174343400E09 +++$+++ GEO.PLRD: could you please post a reply to my using the form in  [http:\/\/www.pererikstrandberg.se\/blog\/comment\/comment.php my blog] instead of on this page. Thanks. \/\/  +++$+++ ::: GEO.PLRD: could you please post a reply to my using the form in  [http://www.pererikstrandberg.se/blog/comment/comment.php my blog] instead of on this page. Thanks. // [[User:PER9000|PER9000]] 15:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

274199 +++$+++ Physchim62 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-22 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.193078400E09 +++$+++ I'm disappointed that you chose to restore the ludicrous block on Sadi Carnot, although I obviously support the discretion of an admin to do so if they feel that that is justified. Rest assured that I have no intention of wheel-warring, and that I have commented on ANI as is obviously appropriate.  +++$+++ I'm disappointed that you chose to restore the ludicrous block on Sadi Carnot, although I obviously support the discretion of an admin to do so if they feel that that is justified. Rest assured that I have no intention of wheel-warring, and that I have commented on ANI as is obviously appropriate. [[User:Physchim62|Physchim62]] [[User talk:Physchim62|(talk)]] 11:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
274200 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274199 +++$+++ 274199 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.193082600E09 +++$+++ If you don't like the result, you can file an appeal with [[WP:ARB|Arbcom]]. That's the correct process.  I will warn you again, accusing other admins of conducting a \"witch hunt\" is a violation of [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:CIVIL]] when the accusation aren't supported with evidence.  I ask again, please refactor your remarks. -  +++$+++ : If you don't like the result, you can file an appeal with [[WP:ARB|Arbcom]]. That's the correct process.  I will warn you again, accusing other admins of conducting a "witch hunt" is a violation of [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:CIVIL]] when the accusation aren't supported with evidence.  I ask again, please refactor your remarks. - [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]]  <sup>[[User_talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 12:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
274201 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274199 +++$+++ 274199 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.193090160E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I disagree with you, however, and I feel the block was appropriate because there was overwhelming community support for it. At the time that I reviewed the case, you were the only person who had opposed it with a large number of people supporting the block and endorsing the community ban proposal.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I disagree with you, however, and I feel the block was appropriate because there was overwhelming community support for it. At the time that I reviewed the case, you were the only person who had opposed it with a large number of people supporting the block and endorsing the community ban proposal. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:56, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

274202 +++$+++ Physchim62 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274202 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-22 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.193078400E09 +++$+++ I'm disappointed that you chose to restore the ludicrous block on Sadi Carnot, although I obviously support the discretion of an admin to do so if they feel that that is justified. Rest assured that I have no intention of wheel-warring, and that I have commented on ANI as is obviously appropriate.  +++$+++ I'm disappointed that you chose to restore the ludicrous block on Sadi Carnot, although I obviously support the discretion of an admin to do so if they feel that that is justified. Rest assured that I have no intention of wheel-warring, and that I have commented on ANI as is obviously appropriate. [[User:Physchim62|Physchim62]] [[User talk:Physchim62|(talk)]] 11:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
274203 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274202 +++$+++ 274202 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.193082600E09 +++$+++ If you don't like the result, you can file an appeal with [[WP:ARB|Arbcom]]. That's the correct process.  I will warn you again, accusing other admins of conducting a \"witch hunt\" is a violation of [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:CIVIL]] when the accusation aren't supported with evidence.  I ask again, please refactor your remarks. -  +++$+++ : If you don't like the result, you can file an appeal with [[WP:ARB|Arbcom]]. That's the correct process.  I will warn you again, accusing other admins of conducting a "witch hunt" is a violation of [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:CIVIL]] when the accusation aren't supported with evidence.  I ask again, please refactor your remarks. - [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]]  <sup>[[User_talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 12:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
274204 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274202 +++$+++ 274202 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.193090160E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I disagree with you, however, and I feel the block was appropriate because there was overwhelming community support for it. At the time that I reviewed the case, you were the only person who had opposed it with a large number of people supporting the block and endorsing the community ban proposal.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I disagree with you, however, and I feel the block was appropriate because there was overwhelming community support for it. At the time that I reviewed the case, you were the only person who had opposed it with a large number of people supporting the block and endorsing the community ban proposal. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:56, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

274205 +++$+++ Lester +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-22 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.193084160E09 +++$+++ I'm concerned that you felt it necessary to complain to the [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents\/User:Timeshift9_trying_to_%22out%22_User:Prester_John#So_what.27s_the_plan.3F|ANi board]] that I'm am edit waring and should get a 1RR restriction. It's a very serious allegation to make about a Wikipedia editor. However, I've got not idea what has brought this on. You need to explain what I have done to warrant a complaint to the ANi, a noticeboard for serious incidents. I'll check back to this page for your reply.--''' +++$+++ I'm concerned that you felt it necessary to complain to the [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents/User:Timeshift9_trying_to_%22out%22_User:Prester_John#So_what.27s_the_plan.3F|ANi board]] that I'm am edit waring and should get a 1RR restriction. It's a very serious allegation to make about a Wikipedia editor. However, I've got not idea what has brought this on. You need to explain what I have done to warrant a complaint to the ANi, a noticeboard for serious incidents. I'll check back to this page for your reply.--'''[[User:Lester|<span style="color:green">Lester</span>]]''' 13:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
274206 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274205 +++$+++ 274205 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.193084460E09 +++$+++ Oh Lester, cut out the melodrama, please. It my personal believe (shared by other admins) that you edit war and that a 1RR applied to PJ should equally apply to his opponents. That is my opinion and as an admin part of my role involves expressing my opinion on the administrators noticeboards. I will continue to do this regardless of your demands and concerns. If you do not like it, perhaps you should stop living there.  +++$+++ :Oh Lester, cut out the melodrama, please. It my personal believe (shared by other admins) that you edit war and that a 1RR applied to PJ should equally apply to his opponents. That is my opinion and as an admin part of my role involves expressing my opinion on the administrators noticeboards. I will continue to do this regardless of your demands and concerns. If you do not like it, perhaps you should stop living there. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
274207 +++$+++ Lester +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274205 +++$+++ 274206 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.193089200E09 +++$+++ Surely it is not too much of a \"demand\", that after I being named on the ANi board for edit waring, with the request that myself and Prester John ''both'' get a 1RR blpck, that I ask ''\"why\"''? Wouldn't you ask why if you were named for something like that? Such a remark has the effect of diminishing one's reputation, and without being offered another reason, I start to wonder if that was the main intention? --''' +++$+++ ::Surely it is not too much of a "demand", that after I being named on the ANi board for edit waring, with the request that myself and Prester John ''both'' get a 1RR blpck, that I ask ''"why"''? Wouldn't you ask why if you were named for something like that? Such a remark has the effect of diminishing one's reputation, and without being offered another reason, I start to wonder if that was the main intention? --'''[[User:Lester|<span style="color:green">Lester</span>]]''' 14:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
274208 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274205 +++$+++ 274207 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.193089860E09 +++$+++ Lester, I refuse to believe that you do not understand that you are considered by many to be one of PJ's edit warring opponents. This is why it is inappropriate to follow your wishes and give you 3RR and PJ 1RR. We all know full well what would happen. FYI, I see your previous block log (3 revert warring blocks from 3 different admins) didn't move with your rename so I linked your logs. Sorry if that interfered with your editing. Should only have lasted one second.  +++$+++ :::Lester, I refuse to believe that you do not understand that you are considered by many to be one of PJ's edit warring opponents. This is why it is inappropriate to follow your wishes and give you 3RR and PJ 1RR. We all know full well what would happen. FYI, I see your previous block log (3 revert warring blocks from 3 different admins) didn't move with your rename so I linked your logs. Sorry if that interfered with your editing. Should only have lasted one second. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
274209 +++$+++ Lester +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274205 +++$+++ 274208 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.193091840E09 +++$+++ Why would a block from August spark a request for a 1RR block in late October? I was a newbie back in August, and you seemed to have missed something, that the 3RR\/blocking stopped back then. Also, there's a very big difference between opposing Prester John's content to being involved in edit wars worthy of a block. You said, ''\"We all know full well what would happen.\"'' I don't know. What would happen? --''' +++$+++ ::::Why would a block from August spark a request for a 1RR block in late October? I was a newbie back in August, and you seemed to have missed something, that the 3RR/blocking stopped back then. Also, there's a very big difference between opposing Prester John's content to being involved in edit wars worthy of a block. You said, ''"We all know full well what would happen."'' I don't know. What would happen? --'''[[User:Lester|<span style="color:green">Lester</span>]]''' 15:24, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
274210 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274205 +++$+++ 274209 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.193123820E09 +++$+++ Just because you haven't been blocked recently does not mean that you haven't been edit warring. If it were true that you are not an edit warrior but rather someone who wants to stop the edit warring, then I do not see why you wouldn't voluntarily agree to a 1RR if PJ and others were also subject to 1RR. I think the only reason that you are for 1RR for PJ and against 1RR for yourself is that you want to continue edit warring, you just want PJ to be hampered. Admins are not going to hand you blanket wins in all edit wars by restricting your opponent but not you. It's just not going to happen.  +++$+++ :::::Just because you haven't been blocked recently does not mean that you haven't been edit warring. If it were true that you are not an edit warrior but rather someone who wants to stop the edit warring, then I do not see why you wouldn't voluntarily agree to a 1RR if PJ and others were also subject to 1RR. I think the only reason that you are for 1RR for PJ and against 1RR for yourself is that you want to continue edit warring, you just want PJ to be hampered. Admins are not going to hand you blanket wins in all edit wars by restricting your opponent but not you. It's just not going to happen. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
274211 +++$+++ Lester +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274205 +++$+++ 274210 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.193136720E09 +++$+++ I'm left wondering why you have been so antagonistic towards me. Have I been rude to you? Or uncivil to you? Or reverted your content? If you really believed I was still reverting too much, why didn't you send me a message about reverting at the time of these alleged revert wars? Instead, the ANi is the first stop. I believe I've always used the talk pages for content disputes. I'm starting to wonder if this is about a content dispute, rather than a problem with revert wars.--''' +++$+++ ::::::I'm left wondering why you have been so antagonistic towards me. Have I been rude to you? Or uncivil to you? Or reverted your content? If you really believed I was still reverting too much, why didn't you send me a message about reverting at the time of these alleged revert wars? Instead, the ANi is the first stop. I believe I've always used the talk pages for content disputes. I'm starting to wonder if this is about a content dispute, rather than a problem with revert wars.--'''[[User:Lester|<span style="color:green">Lester</span>]]''' 03:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
274212 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274205 +++$+++ 274211 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.193137920E09 +++$+++ Cut it out. I have no content dispute with you and other than reverting vandalism and other such maintenance, I don't think we've even been editing the same articles. You really need to learn to separate people's work as administrators from their contributions as editors. My objection to your desire for administrators to implement a 1RR against your opponent is purely administrative: I wont hand either party in any edit war editorial control. By implementing 1RR against PJ but not his opponents, we would be effectively handing editorial control to all articles in this dispute to one side. Now, please stop posting on my page. Thank you.  +++$+++ :::::::Cut it out. I have no content dispute with you and other than reverting vandalism and other such maintenance, I don't think we've even been editing the same articles. You really need to learn to separate people's work as administrators from their contributions as editors. My objection to your desire for administrators to implement a 1RR against your opponent is purely administrative: I wont hand either party in any edit war editorial control. By implementing 1RR against PJ but not his opponents, we would be effectively handing editorial control to all articles in this dispute to one side. Now, please stop posting on my page. Thank you. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

536351 +++$+++ Deon555 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ 536351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-02 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.162537140E09 +++$+++ | Thank you for your support on my [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Deon555_2|RFA]], which closed successfully yesterday with a result of (18\/16\/8). I'd like to let you know that I won't be running for adminship again, until I am nominated, rather than nominating myself again. Thanks for your support, Deon. &mdash; [[User:Deon555|D]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Deon555\/Esperanza|e]]<\/font>[[User:Deon555|on555]]<sup><font color=\"purple\">[[User_talk:Deon555|'''talk''']]<\/font><\/sup><sub> +++$+++ | Thank you for your support on my [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Deon555_2|RFA]], which closed successfully yesterday with a result of (18/16/8). I'd like to let you know that I won't be running for adminship again, until I am nominated, rather than nominating myself again. Thanks for your support, Deon. &mdash; [[User:Deon555|D]]<font color="green">[[User:Deon555/Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User:Deon555|on555]]<sup><font color="purple">[[User_talk:Deon555|'''talk''']]</font></sup><sub>[[User:Deon555/ER|Review]]</sub> 22:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
536352 +++$+++ Xino +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536351 +++$+++ 536351 +++$+++ 2006-04-17 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.145341800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Xino|&gt;x&lt;ino]] 23:30, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
536353 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536351 +++$+++ 536351 +++$+++ 2006-04-18 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.145387940E09 +++$+++ Xino, what point are you trying to make? The information you added was plagiarised, uncited and in violation of Wikipedia's own fair use policy. It added nothing to either of the articles you pasted it into - it was irrelevant in ''both'' - and you failed to even correctly format the text you copied and pasted from another website so that it was even vaguely readable. I'm not interested in you telling me to stop \"arguging\" on my talk page. Keep it to the articles' pages, where it's relevant.  +++$+++ *Xino, what point are you trying to make? The information you added was plagiarised, uncited and in violation of Wikipedia's own fair use policy. It added nothing to either of the articles you pasted it into - it was irrelevant in ''both'' - and you failed to even correctly format the text you copied and pasted from another website so that it was even vaguely readable. I'm not interested in you telling me to stop "arguging" on my talk page. Keep it to the articles' pages, where it's relevant. [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] 12:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

613680 +++$+++ Aa77zz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-10 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.242000240E09 +++$+++ Notwithstanding the caption, my understanding is that because of the time since the first publication of the photo, the copyright has expired and I\u2019m free scan the figure and upload the image to Wikipedia. Is this correct?  +++$+++ Notwithstanding the caption, my understanding is that because of the time since the first publication of the photo, the copyright has expired and I’m free scan the figure and upload the image to Wikipedia. Is this correct? [[User:Aa77zz|Aa77zz]] ([[User talk:Aa77zz|talk]]) 17:04, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
613681 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613680 +++$+++ 613680 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.242004920E09 +++$+++ Nice work! From a look at [[Wikipedia:Copyright situations by country]] both France and the UK are life + 70 years, and [[Nadar (photographer)]] died in 1910 so there should be no problem. Ideally upload it to Commons, then it can also be used in [http:\/\/fr.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cl%C3%A9mence_Royer the French article]. See also [[Wikipedia:Public domain]]. Books often include permissions, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the image isn't public domain. .  +++$+++ :Nice work! From a look at [[Wikipedia:Copyright situations by country]] both France and the UK are life + 70 years, and [[Nadar (photographer)]] died in 1910 so there should be no problem. Ideally upload it to Commons, then it can also be used in [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cl%C3%A9mence_Royer the French article]. See also [[Wikipedia:Public domain]]. Books often include permissions, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the image isn't public domain. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

536354 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-06 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.146950820E09 +++$+++ Like I said, it's annoying about the character info, but I'll live.  This is a free encyclopedia and if I didn't want or expect anybody to edit my work, I shouldn't post here to begin with.  I'm afraid I don't really like doing things twice, though, especially since it could always simply be removed again.  I'll leave it to somebody else.  Have a good one.  +++$+++ Like I said, it's annoying about the character info, but I'll live.  This is a free encyclopedia and if I didn't want or expect anybody to edit my work, I shouldn't post here to begin with.  I'm afraid I don't really like doing things twice, though, especially since it could always simply be removed again.  I'll leave it to somebody else.  Have a good one. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 14:27, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
536355 +++$+++ Xino +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536354 +++$+++ 536354 +++$+++ 2006-05-06 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.146952320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Xino|&gt;x&lt;ino]] 14:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
536356 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536354 +++$+++ 536354 +++$+++ 2006-05-06 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.146985020E09 +++$+++ Xino, the point of the RfC was to show you that your conduct was completely unacceptable, and that it has insulted more than just myself. As it is, ''five'' of us endorsed the statement that I put forward - if anything, that should give you an idea of how many people agree that you need to change your behaviour. In that respect, I can see that it was a waste of time, since you're apparently not going to change the way you act at all. If you continue like this, someone is going to bring the case to arbitration.  +++$+++ :Xino, the point of the RfC was to show you that your conduct was completely unacceptable, and that it has insulted more than just myself. As it is, ''five'' of us endorsed the statement that I put forward - if anything, that should give you an idea of how many people agree that you need to change your behaviour. In that respect, I can see that it was a waste of time, since you're apparently not going to change the way you act at all. If you continue like this, someone is going to bring the case to arbitration. [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] 23:57, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
536357 +++$+++ Xino +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536354 +++$+++ 536354 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.147208880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Xino|&gt;x&lt;ino]] 14:08, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

274213 +++$+++ Tasco 0 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-23 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.193124660E09 +++$+++ Sarah, regarding the problem with this article, I'm not sure if that the content that the other user was adding is [[WP:OR]]. Would you clear that out for me? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Above_the_Law_%28group%29&diff=166207143&oldid=166206488 Diff]. Thank you.--<b><font color=\"#002BB8\"> +++$+++ Sarah, regarding the problem with this article, I'm not sure if that the content that the other user was adding is [[WP:OR]]. Would you clear that out for me? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Above_the_Law_%28group%29&diff=166207143&oldid=166206488 Diff]. Thank you.--<b><font color="#002BB8">[[User:Tasco 0|Tasc0]]</font></b> 00:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
274214 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274213 +++$+++ 274213 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.193129220E09 +++$+++ Well, it seems to be sourced to that website article. Original research is unpublished material, so it isn't really OR if an article is cited to back it up. But I don't think that source is very suitable since the contested material is being sourced to the band themselves. It's okay to use it as a supporting reference, but the person really needs to find an independent reliable source for those claims.  +++$+++ :Well, it seems to be sourced to that website article. Original research is unpublished material, so it isn't really OR if an article is cited to back it up. But I don't think that source is very suitable since the contested material is being sourced to the band themselves. It's okay to use it as a supporting reference, but the person really needs to find an independent reliable source for those claims. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
274215 +++$+++ Tasco 0 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274213 +++$+++ 274214 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.193134320E09 +++$+++ But the artist is talking about Dr. Dre, which he's not being interviewed. I had a similar problem in [[Talk:Man_vs._Wild#Criticism, fakeness and what they don't tell you]]. I had proper sources, but it couldn't get included.--<b><font color=\"#002BB8\"> +++$+++ ::But the artist is talking about Dr. Dre, which he's not being interviewed. I had a similar problem in [[Talk:Man_vs._Wild#Criticism, fakeness and what they don't tell you]]. I had proper sources, but it couldn't get included.--<b><font color="#002BB8">[[User:Tasco 0|Tasc0]]</font></b> 03:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
274216 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274213 +++$+++ 274215 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.193141520E09 +++$+++ I don't have time to go through all of that Man_vs._Wild discussion now but it looks like there were concerns about whether your source meet [[W:RS]] and possibly [[WP:BLP]] concerns. I don't really see any problems with the Above the Law material as long as it can be sourced to a reliable source (which I think is unlikely).  +++$+++ :::I don't have time to go through all of that Man_vs._Wild discussion now but it looks like there were concerns about whether your source meet [[W:RS]] and possibly [[WP:BLP]] concerns. I don't really see any problems with the Above the Law material as long as it can be sourced to a reliable source (which I think is unlikely). [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

536358 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-10 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.147246320E09 +++$+++ Xino, if you're patently uncivil in your edit summaries, someone will notice. Be more civil in the future, please, because [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment\/Xino|these people]] would be happy to see your case taken to arbitration.  +++$+++ Xino, if you're patently uncivil in your edit summaries, someone will notice. Be more civil in the future, please, because [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Xino|these people]] would be happy to see your case taken to arbitration. [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RandyWang|'''rants''']]</sub>) 00:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
536359 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536358 +++$+++ 536358 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.147668120E09 +++$+++ Welcome to Wikipedia, by the way. Good lord, you have a lot of edits under your belt already. ;)  +++$+++ :Welcome to Wikipedia, by the way. Good lord, you have a lot of edits under your belt already. ;) [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RandyWang|'''rants''']]</sub>) 21:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
536360 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536358 +++$+++ 536358 +++$+++ 2006-05-15 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.147693620E09 +++$+++ That's fine - just thought I should point it out. Keep up the editing: from what little I've seen of your work, it's looking good. :)  +++$+++ :That's fine - just thought I should point it out. Keep up the editing: from what little I've seen of your work, it's looking good. :) [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RandyWang|'''rants''']]</sub>) 04:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

89393 +++$+++ WickerGuy +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-15 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.292468880E09 +++$+++ I've been busy these holiday seasons, and am a bit late, but wanted to thank you for all the clean-up work you did on my expansion to the Ligeti \"Atmospheres\" article. My own forte is writing about film and literature, not at all about music. You are clearly a professional in the music field. All your amendations to my work were much appreciated.-- +++$+++ I've been busy these holiday seasons, and am a bit late, but wanted to thank you for all the clean-up work you did on my expansion to the Ligeti "Atmospheres" article. My own forte is writing about film and literature, not at all about music. You are clearly a professional in the music field. All your amendations to my work were much appreciated.--[[User:WickerGuy|WickerGuy]] ([[User talk:WickerGuy|talk]]) 19:08, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
89394 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89393 +++$+++ 89393 +++$+++ 2010-12-15 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.292470560E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. That article was desperately in need, not so much of being cleaned up as of being written in the first place! You made a good start in that direction, and I tried to steer things along as best as I could. It is always good to hear that your efforts are appreciated!\u2014 +++$+++ :You are very welcome. That article was desperately in need, not so much of being cleaned up as of being written in the first place! You made a good start in that direction, and I tried to steer things along as best as I could. It is always good to hear that your efforts are appreciated!—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 19:36, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

274217 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-23 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.193125380E09 +++$+++ You have been named in a request for arbitration titled Sadi Carnot.  Please visit [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration]] and consider making a statement per the instructions there.  Thank you. -  +++$+++ You have been named in a request for arbitration titled Sadi Carnot.  Please visit [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration]] and consider making a statement per the instructions there.  Thank you. - [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]]  <sup>[[User_talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 00:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
274218 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274217 +++$+++ 274217 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.193140800E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that. I've had a most annoying evening, what with my machine clogging repeatedly, and then I had a paying client to deal with for a few hours. I genuinely did mean to tell you that I had unblocked Sadi Carnot conditionally; I apologize.  +++$+++ *Sorry about that. I've had a most annoying evening, what with my machine clogging repeatedly, and then I had a paying client to deal with for a few hours. I genuinely did mean to tell you that I had unblocked Sadi Carnot conditionally; I apologize. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DragonflySixtyseven]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DragonflySixtyseven|contribs]]) 05:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
274219 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274217 +++$+++ 274218 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.193141040E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I understand that you were busy and caught up with real life commitments etc. Thanks for your message, I do appreciate it.  +++$+++ ::Thank you. I understand that you were busy and caught up with real life commitments etc. Thanks for your message, I do appreciate it. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
274220 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274217 +++$+++ 274219 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.193184300E09 +++$+++ Incidentally, can you update\/follow up on your original comment in the RfAr? I'd appreciate that.  +++$+++ :::Incidentally, can you update/follow up on your original comment in the RfAr? I'd appreciate that. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 17:05, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
274221 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274217 +++$+++ 274220 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.193185560E09 +++$+++ I would update it, but I really don't have anything else to add at this stage.  +++$+++ ::::I would update it, but I really don't have anything else to add at this stage. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 17:26, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

536364 +++$+++ Cpswarrior +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-18 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.147978140E09 +++$+++ I see you tagged my article for the [[Adoption and Safe Families Act]] page for wikifying. I have done that and I will remove the tag AFTER I get all the links added. IS that okay? Please advise if I am not doing something correctly. I read the guide. Thanks for tagging. I want to do this right.  +++$+++ I see you tagged my article for the [[Adoption and Safe Families Act]] page for wikifying. I have done that and I will remove the tag AFTER I get all the links added. IS that okay? Please advise if I am not doing something correctly. I read the guide. Thanks for tagging. I want to do this right. [[User:Cpswarrior|cpswarrior]] 11:49, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
536365 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536364 +++$+++ 536364 +++$+++ 2006-05-18 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.147978380E09 +++$+++ Hi, cpswarrior. Thanks for trying to touch up this article, but it's usually best to leave wikify tags for a few days minimum to let other editors touch it up - as it is, the article doesn't appear to meet the style guidelines yet (most noticeably, it lacks an introduction, which should be ''above'' the Contents). Please feel free to fix it up as you see fit, but I'd suggest you leave the wikify tag until a few other editors have taken a look.  +++$+++ :Hi, cpswarrior. Thanks for trying to touch up this article, but it's usually best to leave wikify tags for a few days minimum to let other editors touch it up - as it is, the article doesn't appear to meet the style guidelines yet (most noticeably, it lacks an introduction, which should be ''above'' the Contents). Please feel free to fix it up as you see fit, but I'd suggest you leave the wikify tag until a few other editors have taken a look. [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RandyWang|'''rants''']]</sub>) 11:53, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
536366 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536364 +++$+++ 536364 +++$+++ 2006-05-18 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.147980120E09 +++$+++ That's cool. Thanks for leaving it - have fun at work. :P  +++$+++ :That's cool. Thanks for leaving it - have fun at work. :P [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RandyWang|'''rants''']]</sub>) 12:22, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

274222 +++$+++ Ryan Postlethwaite +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-23 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.193187300E09 +++$+++ You've been lucky enough to have been graced with an email off yours truly - enjoy!  +++$+++ You've been lucky enough to have been graced with an email off yours truly - enjoy! [[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|'''<font color="#000088">Ry<font color="#220066">an<font color="#550044"> P<font color="#770022">os<font color="#aa0000">tl</font>et</font>hw</font>ai</font>te</font>''']] 17:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
274223 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274222 +++$+++ 274222 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.193216940E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Mr Postlethwaite. I feel truly honored to receive an email from such an eminent Wikipedian and I shall reply to you shortly. :)  +++$+++ :Thank you, Mr Postlethwaite. I feel truly honored to receive an email from such an eminent Wikipedian and I shall reply to you shortly. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

536367 +++$+++ Phenss +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-19 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.148055720E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Phenss|Phenss]] 09:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
536368 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536367 +++$+++ 536367 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.148106960E09 +++$+++ The Wikify tag is there so that other people know that the article needs Wikifaction. I'm not particularly good at Wikifying articles myself, but I ''do'' know when they need more attention - hence the tag being placed there to gain the attention of people that can help. Please refer to the Manual of Style that the template refers to if you want to fix up the page yourself.  +++$+++ :The Wikify tag is there so that other people know that the article needs Wikifaction. I'm not particularly good at Wikifying articles myself, but I ''do'' know when they need more attention - hence the tag being placed there to gain the attention of people that can help. Please refer to the Manual of Style that the template refers to if you want to fix up the page yourself. [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RandyWang|'''rants''']]</sub>) 23:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

274224 +++$+++ Strothra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.193216520E09 +++$+++ I just sent you one as well. -- +++$+++ I just sent you one as well. --[[User:Strothra|Strothra]] 02:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
274225 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274224 +++$+++ 274224 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.193216760E09 +++$+++ Thx, I got it. I'm just looking into it now.  +++$+++ :Thx, I got it. I'm just looking into it now. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

536369 +++$+++ Wetman +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-20 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.148138520E09 +++$+++ You tagged it as needing Wikification, perhaps without looking it over. I've reverted your thoughtless tag. Not ''every'' noun needs to jump out at the reader in a blue wiki-link. -- +++$+++ You tagged it as needing Wikification, perhaps without looking it over. I've reverted your thoughtless tag. Not ''every'' noun needs to jump out at the reader in a blue wiki-link. --[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] 08:22, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
536370 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536369 +++$+++ 536369 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.148138820E09 +++$+++ How was this tag added \"thoughtlessly\"? I'll refer you to [[WP:AGF]] on this one.  As for the addition itself, the page could do with some organisation into sections, some light copyediting, and a reworked introduction. The article is ''good'' at the moment, but could definitely do with more work, which is why I added the tag.  +++$+++ :How was this tag added "thoughtlessly"? I'll refer you to [[WP:AGF]] on this one.  As for the addition itself, the page could do with some organisation into sections, some light copyediting, and a reworked introduction. The article is ''good'' at the moment, but could definitely do with more work, which is why I added the tag. [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RandyWang|'''rants''']]</sub>) 08:27, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
536371 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536369 +++$+++ 536369 +++$+++ 2006-05-21 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.148198160E09 +++$+++ I would suggest that it could do with some organisation into at least a couple of logical sections (such as History, Controversies, Legacy, and a full section for See Also and so on), as well as a little cleanup to fit Wikipedia's Manual of Style (linked to from the wikify box on that page): in particular, you should try to avoid too-short paragraphs (anything less than around two sentences), and it could perhaps benefit from some more blue wikilinks. It's a good article, but I thought (and may have been wrong) that it needed some cleanup in those areas. :)  +++$+++ :I would suggest that it could do with some organisation into at least a couple of logical sections (such as History, Controversies, Legacy, and a full section for See Also and so on), as well as a little cleanup to fit Wikipedia's Manual of Style (linked to from the wikify box on that page): in particular, you should try to avoid too-short paragraphs (anything less than around two sentences), and it could perhaps benefit from some more blue wikilinks. It's a good article, but I thought (and may have been wrong) that it needed some cleanup in those areas. :) [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RandyWang|'''rants''']]</sub>) 00:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

274226 +++$+++ Gnangarra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.193216940E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, an thread you should be aware of [[WP:AN#Forum shopping by AFD group]]  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, an thread you should be aware of [[WP:AN#Forum shopping by AFD group]] [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 02:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
274227 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274226 +++$+++ 274226 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.193217360E09 +++$+++ Thanks Gnang. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks Gnang. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

613683 +++$+++ Macdonald-ross +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-14 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.242338520E09 +++$+++ I've reinstated the archiving on [[Talk:Jean-Baptiste Lamarck]] that had been improperly (IMHO) reversed by Logicus. The whole thread raises issue of talk pages being more or less blocked by persistent one-issue campaigners, and hence made unfriendly for normal discussion. Not expecting a solution, just felt like airing my frustration!  +++$+++ I've reinstated the archiving on [[Talk:Jean-Baptiste Lamarck]] that had been improperly (IMHO) reversed by Logicus. The whole thread raises issue of talk pages being more or less blocked by persistent one-issue campaigners, and hence made unfriendly for normal discussion. Not expecting a solution, just felt like airing my frustration! [[User:Macdonald-ross|Macdonald-ross]] ([[User talk:Macdonald-ross|talk]]) 15:02, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
613684 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613683 +++$+++ 613683 +++$+++ 2009-05-14 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.242362160E09 +++$+++ Just so. Logicus seems to have quietened down for the moment, which is more than can be said for {{User|Filanca}} harping on at [[Talk:Charles Darwin#Darwin's racism]]. Tedious. .  +++$+++ :Just so. Logicus seems to have quietened down for the moment, which is more than can be said for {{User|Filanca}} harping on at [[Talk:Charles Darwin#Darwin's racism]]. Tedious. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

274228 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-26 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.193410800E09 +++$+++ {{user|Dihydrogen Monoxide}} pointed me to MelsaranAWB. I'm having trouble finding active editors who can do automated without human confirmation to help me out. Any ideas? I've already posted at Bot requests, but no one commented there yet. -  +++$+++ {{user|Dihydrogen Monoxide}} pointed me to MelsaranAWB. I'm having trouble finding active editors who can do automated without human confirmation to help me out. Any ideas? I've already posted at Bot requests, but no one commented there yet. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 08:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
274229 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274228 +++$+++ 274228 +++$+++ 2007-10-26 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.193412240E09 +++$+++ I'm not really sure. Is that what [[User talk:R|R]] does? I remember reading on his RFA that he runs some kind of AWB-based bot but don't know the details of it.  +++$+++ :I'm not really sure. Is that what [[User talk:R|R]] does? I remember reading on his RFA that he runs some kind of AWB-based bot but don't know the details of it. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

536374 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-22 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.148300580E09 +++$+++ Agreed. To some extent, I did, and I didn't want for that to be unearthed later in arbitration - I thought it would be more appropriate to tell the full history of the dispute right off the bat. I'd be happy to defend that action at the arbitration page if you ask me to, or else I'll reply here again sometime tonight (when I have the time). Thanks for pointing it out.  +++$+++ Agreed. To some extent, I did, and I didn't want for that to be unearthed later in arbitration - I thought it would be more appropriate to tell the full history of the dispute right off the bat. I'd be happy to defend that action at the arbitration page if you ask me to, or else I'll reply here again sometime tonight (when I have the time). Thanks for pointing it out. [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RandyWang|'''rants''']]</sub>) 05:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
536375 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536374 +++$+++ 536374 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.148316420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RandyWang|'''rants''']]</sub>) 09:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
536376 +++$+++ Katefan0 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536374 +++$+++ 536375 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.148339400E09 +++$+++ To meet the definition of wikistalking the following must be done with an intent to harrass, which is not the case here. The \"user contributions\" feature is there for a reason; cleaning up after someone is a thankless task and when done in the interests of Wikipedia is not harassment. Anyway, I went to the RFAr to comment and saw that he's already been blocked, so. There ya go. Thanks for your diligence. &middot; [[User:Katefan0|Ka]][[User:JCarriker\/TC|t]] +++$+++ ::To meet the definition of wikistalking the following must be done with an intent to harrass, which is not the case here. The "user contributions" feature is there for a reason; cleaning up after someone is a thankless task and when done in the interests of Wikipedia is not harassment. Anyway, I went to the RFAr to comment and saw that he's already been blocked, so. There ya go. Thanks for your diligence. &middot; [[User:Katefan0|Ka]][[User:JCarriker/TC|t]][[User:Katefan0|efan0]] <sup>[[User talk:Katefan0|(scribble)]]</sup> 16:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
536377 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536374 +++$+++ 536376 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.148357400E09 +++$+++ Wow, I certainly didn't expect him to be blocked so quickly. Thanks for your support here, anyway. :)  +++$+++ :::Wow, I certainly didn't expect him to be blocked so quickly. Thanks for your support here, anyway. :) [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RandyWang|'''rants''']]</sub>) 21:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
536378 +++$+++ RandyWang +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536374 +++$+++ 536374 +++$+++ 2006-06-07 08:44:00 +++$+++ 1.149695040E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia does not provide reviews of films, nor does it ever attempt to breach the objective stance demanded of an encyclopedia. While the movie ''may'' be fast-paced and energetic, but that's ''not'' something that should be put on Wikipedia - it's an inherently subjective analysis of the film, not an objective fact. Review content, such as that, should be placed on the IMDB or some other review site (which is why I linked to it at the bottom of the article), but not on Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :Wikipedia does not provide reviews of films, nor does it ever attempt to breach the objective stance demanded of an encyclopedia. While the movie ''may'' be fast-paced and energetic, but that's ''not'' something that should be put on Wikipedia - it's an inherently subjective analysis of the film, not an objective fact. Review content, such as that, should be placed on the IMDB or some other review site (which is why I linked to it at the bottom of the article), but not on Wikipedia. [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RandyWang|'''rants''']]</sub>) 08:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

12088 +++$+++ Elenseel +++$+++ CorkMan +++$+++ 12088 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-03 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.186193040E09 +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created{{{{{subst|}}}#if:\xc9amonn Young|, [[:\xc9amonn Young]],}} may not conform to some of Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|guidelines]] for new articles, so it will shortly be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|removed]] (if it hasn't been already). Please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for any tests you may want to do and please read our [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction page]] to learn more about contributing. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-create1 -->  +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Éamonn Young|, [[:Éamonn Young]],}} may not conform to some of Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|guidelines]] for new articles, so it will shortly be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|removed]] (if it hasn't been already). Please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for any tests you may want to do and please read our [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction page]] to learn more about contributing. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-create1 --> [[User:Elenseel|Elenseel]] 19:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
12089 +++$+++ Spyder_Monkey +++$+++ CorkMan +++$+++ 12088 +++$+++ 12088 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.188118020E09 +++$+++ Oops, sorry about that.  It seems the page had been vandalized into an article about some nonnotable tennis player.  My mistake.  +++$+++ :Oops, sorry about that.  It seems the page had been vandalized into an article about some nonnotable tennis player.  My mistake. [[User:Spyder_Monkey|Spyder_Monkey]] <small>([[User talk:Spyder_Monkey|Talk]])</small> 01:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

274233 +++$+++ Tasco 0 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-29 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.193719320E09 +++$+++ Please, would you tell the user what the situation is? I do not feel like talking to him, he removed a warning I placed in his talk page days ago. Thank you.--<b><font color=\"#002BB8\"> +++$+++ Please, would you tell the user what the situation is? I do not feel like talking to him, he removed a warning I placed in his talk page days ago. Thank you.--<b><font color="#002BB8">[[User:Tasco 0|Tasc0]]</font></b> 21:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
274234 +++$+++ Tasco 0 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274233 +++$+++ 274233 +++$+++ 2007-10-29 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.193719500E09 +++$+++ A second later I post this new thread, the user created [[User_talk:Tasco_0#Above_the_Law|this one]], claiming I'm an tyrannical and egotistical person. I find that harmful and a [[WP:ATTACK|personal attack]]. I will ignore this user until you response to any of this threads.--<b><font color=\"#002BB8\"> +++$+++ : A second later I post this new thread, the user created [[User_talk:Tasco_0#Above_the_Law|this one]], claiming I'm an tyrannical and egotistical person. I find that harmful and a [[WP:ATTACK|personal attack]]. I will ignore this user until you response to any of this threads.--<b><font color="#002BB8">[[User:Tasco 0|Tasc0]]</font></b> 21:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
274235 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274233 +++$+++ 274234 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.193772480E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks, Tasco, for bringing it to my attention instead of edit warring. I'm just looking into this right now.  +++$+++ ::Okay, thanks, Tasco, for bringing it to my attention instead of edit warring. I'm just looking into this right now. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
274236 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274233 +++$+++ 274234 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.193781420E09 +++$+++ I have asked another administrator to give an opinion about this dispute. I'm not sure when he'll have a chance to respond, but in the meanwhile, I'm going to talk to Cosprings about his comments.  +++$+++ ::I have asked another administrator to give an opinion about this dispute. I'm not sure when he'll have a chance to respond, but in the meanwhile, I'm going to talk to Cosprings about his comments. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
274237 +++$+++ Tasco 0 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274233 +++$+++ 274236 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.193806500E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I'm looking forward to see what the other administrator has to say.--<b><font color=\"#002BB8\"> +++$+++ :::Thank you. I'm looking forward to see what the other administrator has to say.--<b><font color="#002BB8">[[User:Tasco 0|Tasc0]]</font></b> 21:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

12090 +++$+++ Arendedwinter +++$+++ CorkMan +++$+++ 12090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-24 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.190675760E09 +++$+++ [[Jer Henchion]],[[Dan Drew]],[[John Buckley]],[[Dan Looney]],[[Dan Linehan]],[[Dan Lane]],[[Tom Toomey]],[[Thady O'Connor]],[[Pat Buckley]],[[John Kelleher]],[[Dan Sullivan]],[[Denis Horgan]],[[Michael Horgan]], and the (at the time of this writing) 8 other players who haven't been written about yet.   +++$+++ [[Jer Henchion]],[[Dan Drew]],[[John Buckley]],[[Dan Looney]],[[Dan Linehan]],[[Dan Lane]],[[Tom Toomey]],[[Thady O'Connor]],[[Pat Buckley]],[[John Kelleher]],[[Dan Sullivan]],[[Denis Horgan]],[[Michael Horgan]], and the (at the time of this writing) 8 other players who haven't been written about yet.  [[User:Arendedwinter|Arendedwinter]] 16:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
12091 +++$+++ Vintagekits +++$+++ CorkMan +++$+++ 12090 +++$+++ 12090 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.194685020E09 +++$+++ I would say they are all notable - not a fan of stub articles like and would prefer to see more meat on the bones but they have all played at the highest level of Gaelic games and I would say that that makes them notable - especially when we consider that all footballers who have played for any team in the English soccers leagues (Divisions 1 through to 4) gain automatic notability. Good work btw Corkman.-- +++$+++ :I would say they are all notable - not a fan of stub articles like and would prefer to see more meat on the bones but they have all played at the highest level of Gaelic games and I would say that that makes them notable - especially when we consider that all footballers who have played for any team in the English soccers leagues (Divisions 1 through to 4) gain automatic notability. Good work btw Corkman.--[[User:Vintagekits|Vintagekits]] 00:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

395231 +++$+++ MrKIA11 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ 395231 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-07 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.304819520E09 +++$+++ Separate issue, but you seem to own every useful tool there is; How can pages listed on [[Wikipedia:Database reports\/Ownerless pages in the user space]] be manually removed? The two listed there now are valid.  +++$+++ Separate issue, but you seem to own every useful tool there is; How can pages listed on [[Wikipedia:Database reports/Ownerless pages in the user space]] be manually removed? The two listed there now are valid. [[User:MrKIA11|MrKIA11]] ([[User talk:MrKIA11|talk]]) 18:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
395232 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ 395231 +++$+++ 395231 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.306475400E09 +++$+++ Thoughts? -- +++$+++ : Thoughts? --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride#top|talk]]) 22:50, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
395233 +++$+++ MrKIA11 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ 395231 +++$+++ 395232 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.306476180E09 +++$+++ You're the pro with the tools, so if adding a check is easy enough, it seems to me that it would make sense. As far as the other account, I'd be willing to do whatever necessary, I just don't know how to go about doing that.  +++$+++ ::You're the pro with the tools, so if adding a check is easy enough, it seems to me that it would make sense. As far as the other account, I'd be willing to do whatever necessary, I just don't know how to go about doing that. [[User:MrKIA11|MrKIA11]] ([[User talk:MrKIA11|talk]]) 23:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
395234 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ 395231 +++$+++ 395233 +++$+++ 2011-06-01 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.306915560E09 +++$+++ As for the local account, simply visit {{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|type=signup}} while logged in with your admin account and you can create the placeholder user \"COFS\" (as admins have the \"[[Special:ListGroupRights|override-antispoof]]\" user right). -- +++$+++ ::: As for the local account, simply visit {{fullurl:Special:UserLogin|type=signup}} while logged in with your admin account and you can create the placeholder user "COFS" (as admins have the "[[Special:ListGroupRights|override-antispoof]]" user right). --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride#top|talk]]) 01:06, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

274238 +++$+++ Herbythyme +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.193763420E09 +++$+++ And because someone pointed it out to me!  Thanks a lot for the defence (even tho I was unaware of it).  I've posted to Viridae too as he has a point - such advanced behaviour from such a new person would now have me on quite a high alert - it can be explained if you know where to [[user:NigelR|look!]]  Cheers -- +++$+++ And because someone pointed it out to me!  Thanks a lot for the defence (even tho I was unaware of it).  I've posted to Viridae too as he has a point - such advanced behaviour from such a new person would now have me on quite a high alert - it can be explained if you know where to [[user:NigelR|look!]]  Cheers --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 09:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
274239 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274238 +++$+++ 274238 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.193764200E09 +++$+++ No worries, Herby. I knew that you were a busy fellow as I see you around the projects, but I had to look up your Meta page to check exactly where all your flags are and when I saw how many you have I figured you must be a bot yourself if you have enough time to do all that work AND run sockpuppets! lol. All the best,  +++$+++ :No worries, Herby. I knew that you were a busy fellow as I see you around the projects, but I had to look up your Meta page to check exactly where all your flags are and when I saw how many you have I figured you must be a bot yourself if you have enough time to do all that work AND run sockpuppets! lol. All the best, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
274240 +++$+++ Herbythyme +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274238 +++$+++ 274239 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.193766240E09 +++$+++ And there's me trying to keep a low profile - I guessed you must have peeked! Take care -- +++$+++ ::And there's me trying to keep a low profile - I guessed you must have peeked! Take care --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 10:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

613685 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-17 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.242611160E09 +++$+++ This is a typical IBW+sockpuppet pattern of behaviour, in my view. It is exactly what I was subjected to, more than once, albeit from different IPs. Notice though, this latest IP's contributions show four edits to [[Looe Valley Line]], which I B Wright has made edits to in the past, as has one of his earlier suspected sockpuppets.\u2013 +++$+++ This is a typical IBW+sockpuppet pattern of behaviour, in my view. It is exactly what I was subjected to, more than once, albeit from different IPs. Notice though, this latest IP's contributions show four edits to [[Looe Valley Line]], which I B Wright has made edits to in the past, as has one of his earlier suspected sockpuppets.–[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 18:46, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
613686 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613685 +++$+++ 613685 +++$+++ 2009-05-18 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.242697680E09 +++$+++ Looks possible, but neither has edited since 20 April and it seems a bit stale. Any new activity and we can bring the question up, with a reminder to avoid behaving that way. ..  +++$+++ :Looks possible, but neither has edited since 20 April and it seems a bit stale. Any new activity and we can bring the question up, with a reminder to avoid behaving that way. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

274241 +++$+++ Barneca +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274241 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.193771040E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah.  His answers to my questions seemed a little... odd, and my AGF'ing waivered a bit.  Hoping it's not him; sounds extremely awful what you've had to deal with. -- +++$+++ Thanks Sarah.  His answers to my questions seemed a little... odd, and my AGF'ing waivered a bit.  Hoping it's not him; sounds extremely awful what you've had to deal with. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User_talk:Barneca|talk]]) 12:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
274242 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274241 +++$+++ 274241 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.193799960E09 +++$+++ Hey Barneca, I agree the answers did seem odd but maybe it was just newbiness and confusion. I am going to keep an eye on him, though, and will block if necessary. I don't really want to say too much because the other guy monitors my talk page and edits and I don't want to teach to do a better job. :)  +++$+++ :Hey Barneca, I agree the answers did seem odd but maybe it was just newbiness and confusion. I am going to keep an eye on him, though, and will block if necessary. I don't really want to say too much because the other guy monitors my talk page and edits and I don't want to teach to do a better job. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 20:06, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

274243 +++$+++ Timeshift9 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274243 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.193781540E09 +++$+++ Your clarifiation [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Australian_federal_election%2C_2007#Two_seat_Senate_majority here] would be very appreciated. Thanks.  +++$+++ Your clarifiation [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Australian_federal_election%2C_2007#Two_seat_Senate_majority here] would be very appreciated. Thanks. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] 14:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
274244 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274243 +++$+++ 274243 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.193793600E09 +++$+++ Oh boy, another politics dispute. 8)  +++$+++ :Oh boy, another politics dispute. 8) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 18:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

274245 +++$+++ Cosprings +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.193799420E09 +++$+++ No, some statments do not need sources.  For instance, it is perfectly ok to say that they are sometime credited with the creation of g-funk.  They are, sometime.  This is true.  All real hip hop fans know this.  It does not say they created g-funk, it merely suggests they may have, which is true.  As for my calling him \"names\", get off it.  Its not threats, nor aggressive language.  I just think his (tasco) actions are wrong and self-centered.  I think people like him are what will eventually ruin this website, and I will not sit quietly and hide my anger over his outrageous actions.  Article on un-important things like hip hop groups do not need to be \"approved\" by administratorrs, let the people have it their way and keep tasco from deleting information.  By the way, you and he both continually delete info not even related to this so-called issue +++$+++ No, some statments do not need sources.  For instance, it is perfectly ok to say that they are sometime credited with the creation of g-funk.  They are, sometime.  This is true.  All real hip hop fans know this.  It does not say they created g-funk, it merely suggests they may have, which is true.  As for my calling him "names", get off it.  Its not threats, nor aggressive language.  I just think his (tasco) actions are wrong and self-centered.  I think people like him are what will eventually ruin this website, and I will not sit quietly and hide my anger over his outrageous actions.  Article on un-important things like hip hop groups do not need to be "approved" by administratorrs, let the people have it their way and keep tasco from deleting information.  By the way, you and he both continually delete info not even related to this so-called issue[[User:Cosprings|Cosprings]] 19:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
274246 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274245 +++$+++ 274245 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.193799840E09 +++$+++ I don't care what \"all hip hop fans know\". If it is true then it will be easy to find reliable sources. You are mistaken, not everything Wikipedia needs to be sourced but ''it does need to be source-able''. And the burden of citing the evidence falls on the person wanting to add the material. The other guy has asked for sources and if you want the material included, you need to find a reliable source. Please go and discuss this with Tasco. Thankyou,  +++$+++ :I don't care what "all hip hop fans know". If it is true then it will be easy to find reliable sources. You are mistaken, not everything Wikipedia needs to be sourced but ''it does need to be source-able''. And the burden of citing the evidence falls on the person wanting to add the material. The other guy has asked for sources and if you want the material included, you need to find a reliable source. Please go and discuss this with Tasco. Thankyou, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 20:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
274247 +++$+++ Tasco 0 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274245 +++$+++ 274246 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.193806800E09 +++$+++ I don't find that way as correct to refer to other editors and administrator. He's claiming he will not \"sit quietly and hide is anger\". What's that suppose to mean? I think the user still doesn't understand [[WP:ATTACK]]. He called me and [[User:Sarah|Sarah]] \"ruiners of Wikipedia\". The user is still ofending me. I lighty request a block.--<b><font color=\"#002BB8\"> +++$+++ ::I don't find that way as correct to refer to other editors and administrator. He's claiming he will not "sit quietly and hide is anger". What's that suppose to mean? I think the user still doesn't understand [[WP:ATTACK]]. He called me and [[User:Sarah|Sarah]] "ruiners of Wikipedia". The user is still ofending me. I lighty request a block.--<b><font color="#002BB8">[[User:Tasco 0|Tasc0]]</font></b> 22:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
274248 +++$+++ Gnangarra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274245 +++$+++ 274245 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.193817480E09 +++$+++ FYI I blocked Cosprings and it has been notified at [[WP:AN\/I#User:Cosprings]]  +++$+++ : FYI I blocked Cosprings and it has been notified at [[WP:AN/I#User:Cosprings]] [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 00:58, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
274249 +++$+++ Tasco 0 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274245 +++$+++ 274248 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.193827860E09 +++$+++ I appreciate how you dealed with the situation, Gnangarra. And also Sarah.--<b><font color=\"#002BB8\"> +++$+++ ::I appreciate how you dealed with the situation, Gnangarra. And also Sarah.--<b><font color="#002BB8">[[User:Tasco 0|Tasc0]]</font></b> 03:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
274250 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274245 +++$+++ 274248 +++$+++ 2007-11-03 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.194080940E09 +++$+++ Thanks Gnang for stepping in and taking care of that. Much appreciated.  +++$+++ ::Thanks Gnang for stepping in and taking care of that. Much appreciated. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

264161 +++$+++ Eusebeus +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-28 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.183058160E09 +++$+++ I thought I would try to head off any nastiness at the head. I listed the articles for Season 1 per the notability template and have now posted to the main talk page explaining my rationale. I apologise if my actions seem overly-targeted; I would have expressed the issue first on the talk page, but the 14 day review process seems sufficient to redress the issues raised, Moreover, redirect is '''not''' deletion and any article can be recreated should it met the standards listed at WP:Episodes. I think it is very important that we adhere to the policies and guidelines and I look forward to any thoughts you may have. Above all, I hope that my actions not be misconstrued.  +++$+++ I thought I would try to head off any nastiness at the head. I listed the articles for Season 1 per the notability template and have now posted to the main talk page explaining my rationale. I apologise if my actions seem overly-targeted; I would have expressed the issue first on the talk page, but the 14 day review process seems sufficient to redress the issues raised, Moreover, redirect is '''not''' deletion and any article can be recreated should it met the standards listed at WP:Episodes. I think it is very important that we adhere to the policies and guidelines and I look forward to any thoughts you may have. Above all, I hope that my actions not be misconstrued. [[User:Eusebeus|Eusebeus]] 12:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
264162 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264161 +++$+++ 264161 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.183145880E09 +++$+++ Hello. I deleted the redirect, as the article itself (\"[[List of films with similar themes and release dates]]\") was deleted by someone else after an [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of films with similar themes and release dates (3rd nomination)|AFD]]. I deleted the redundant redirect and removed some links to the page in a couple of 'See also' sections.  +++$+++ :Hello. I deleted the redirect, as the article itself ("[[List of films with similar themes and release dates]]") was deleted by someone else after an [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films with similar themes and release dates (3rd nomination)|AFD]]. I deleted the redundant redirect and removed some links to the page in a couple of 'See also' sections. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

274251 +++$+++ Ultraexactzz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274251 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-31 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.193858760E09 +++$+++ Good morning. I wanted to make sure you knew that I was attempting to fully agree with you regarding the courtesy blanking of the David Pearce AFD. My caveat was a strong attempt on my part to [[WP:AGF]], as I feel that some of the editors on the page were being disrespectful to Mr. Pearce, if only incidentally. It was not any sort of criticism on your own conduct, which was (as always) impeccable. Sorry for the confusion,  +++$+++ Good morning. I wanted to make sure you knew that I was attempting to fully agree with you regarding the courtesy blanking of the David Pearce AFD. My caveat was a strong attempt on my part to [[WP:AGF]], as I feel that some of the editors on the page were being disrespectful to Mr. Pearce, if only incidentally. It was not any sort of criticism on your own conduct, which was (as always) impeccable. Sorry for the confusion, [[User:Ultraexactzz|ZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 12:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
274252 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274251 +++$+++ 274251 +++$+++ 2007-11-03 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.194081000E09 +++$+++ No problems. I understood what you mean.  +++$+++ :No problems. I understood what you mean. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

274253 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-03 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.194081420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for any advice\/help you can offer.  &mdash; +++$+++ Thanks for any advice/help you can offer.  &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 02:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
274254 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274253 +++$+++ 274253 +++$+++ 2007-11-03 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.194082320E09 +++$+++ Hey Viri, I just sprotected the article for one week and I'll have a look at blocking those accounts. I know I still owe you an email--I haven't forgotten, I promise. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hey Viri, I just sprotected the article for one week and I'll have a look at blocking those accounts. I know I still owe you an email--I haven't forgotten, I promise. :) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:32, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
274255 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274253 +++$+++ 274254 +++$+++ 2007-11-03 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.194082380E09 +++$+++ Ah, sprotection, great.  Thanks ever so much, and don't worry about the e-mail, I know you've been very busy. :) &mdash; +++$+++ ::Ah, sprotection, great.  Thanks ever so much, and don't worry about the e-mail, I know you've been very busy. :) &mdash;[[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] | [[User talk:Viriditas|Talk]] 02:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

307853 +++$+++ Jtdirl +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307853 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.156851780E09 +++$+++ The problem re ''constituent country'' on the Northern Ireland page is that Mal is unwilling to accept that a controversial feature in the article in a way that is ''explanatory'' (via a footnote with a neutrally worded link) and demands ''usage'' (which would indicate WP approval that the term is accurate, and so ipso facto those who oppose it are wrong).Where a term clearly lacks cross community support we cannot ''use'' it. Republicans went ballistic when DJ, myself and others defended its ''mention'' in a footnote (they say bias in its existence on the page!). Now Unionists like Mal are going ballistic because WP won't ''use'' it and so ipso facto validate it. As it is not a cross community term we can no more use it than we can ''Six Counties'' or ''Ulster''. They are ''mentioned'', not used, in the text. (Apologies for the great length. I don't think you understood the context of the issue here. As a credible Wikipedian you needed to be briefed on it.)  +++$+++ The problem re ''constituent country'' on the Northern Ireland page is that Mal is unwilling to accept that a controversial feature in the article in a way that is ''explanatory'' (via a footnote with a neutrally worded link) and demands ''usage'' (which would indicate WP approval that the term is accurate, and so ipso facto those who oppose it are wrong).Where a term clearly lacks cross community support we cannot ''use'' it. Republicans went ballistic when DJ, myself and others defended its ''mention'' in a footnote (they say bias in its existence on the page!). Now Unionists like Mal are going ballistic because WP won't ''use'' it and so ipso facto validate it. As it is not a cross community term we can no more use it than we can ''Six Counties'' or ''Ulster''. They are ''mentioned'', not used, in the text. (Apologies for the great length. I don't think you understood the context of the issue here. As a credible Wikipedian you needed to be briefed on it.) [[User:Jtdirl|<span style="color:green; background-color:pink">'''Fear''ÉIREANN'''''</span>]][[Image:Ireland-up.png|15px]]\<sup><font color="blue">[[User talk:Jtdirl|(caint)]]</font></sup> 04:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
307854 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307853 +++$+++ 307853 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.157042400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the briefing, I do appreciate the complexities and haven't rushed into commenting on this. Your backing in having these terms properly mentioned and explained in the article is appreciated, and you'll have noted that I was not suggesting unqualified usage which some users might want. Oddly, given the sensitivity, \"six counties\" appears in the second sentence of the intro. The \"constituent part\" bit is labelled \"(dubious assertion\u2014see talk page)\", so clearly work is needed to achieve proper NPOV in the lead. The ''Variations in geographic nomenclature'' section would seem a proper place to provide an explanation, as would [[Alternative names for Northern Ireland]], both of which properly discuss even more contentious terms. Will try to have a go at this when time permits, .. +++$+++ :Thanks for the briefing, I do appreciate the complexities and haven't rushed into commenting on this. Your backing in having these terms properly mentioned and explained in the article is appreciated, and you'll have noted that I was not suggesting unqualified usage which some users might want. Oddly, given the sensitivity, "six counties" appears in the second sentence of the intro. The "constituent part" bit is labelled "(dubious assertion—see talk page)", so clearly work is needed to achieve proper NPOV in the lead. The ''Variations in geographic nomenclature'' section would seem a proper place to provide an explanation, as would [[Alternative names for Northern Ireland]], both of which properly discuss even more contentious terms. Will try to have a go at this when time permits, ..[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
307855 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307853 +++$+++ 307854 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.157592000E09 +++$+++ A [[WP:RFM|request for mediation]] has been filed with the [[WP:MC|Mediation Committee]].  It doesn't list you as a party, but you may wish to add yourself.  Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation\/Northern Ireland]] and, if you wish, add you name and indicate that you agree to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to [[Wikipedia:Mediation]]. '''There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.''' -- +++$+++ ::A [[WP:RFM|request for mediation]] has been filed with the [[WP:MC|Mediation Committee]].  It doesn't list you as a party, but you may wish to add yourself.  Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Northern Ireland]] and, if you wish, add you name and indicate that you agree to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to [[Wikipedia:Mediation]]. '''There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.''' --[[User:Hro%C3%B0ulf|Hroðulf]] (or Hrothulf) ([[User talk:Hro%C3%B0ulf|Talk]]) 18:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

482616 +++$+++ Sanfranman59 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482616 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-23 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.174710900E09 +++$+++ I see that you're out here today patrolling for vandalism. I've just recently installed Vandal Fighter and have done a fair number of vandalism reverts. Since you seem to have a good deal of experience in this area, do you generally start out with low level warnings for each vandal and then progress through the other levels? Or do you take into consideration the extent and offensiveness of the vandalism and try to make the warning level fit the crime? What about cases where the same person vandalizes multiple pages at around the same time? Do you put a warning for each case on their talk page so that admins know how many times they've vandalized a page? Or do you \"group\" the offenses together in a single warning? Thanks in advance for any guidance.  +++$+++ I see that you're out here today patrolling for vandalism. I've just recently installed Vandal Fighter and have done a fair number of vandalism reverts. Since you seem to have a good deal of experience in this area, do you generally start out with low level warnings for each vandal and then progress through the other levels? Or do you take into consideration the extent and offensiveness of the vandalism and try to make the warning level fit the crime? What about cases where the same person vandalizes multiple pages at around the same time? Do you put a warning for each case on their talk page so that admins know how many times they've vandalized a page? Or do you "group" the offenses together in a single warning? Thanks in advance for any guidance. [[User:Sanfranman59|Sanfranman59]] 21:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
482617 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482616 +++$+++ 482616 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.174727520E09 +++$+++ For logged-in accounts, I usually block quickly, especially when every edit is obvious vandalism.  For anonymous accounts, more care needs to be taken.  Many vandal edits are the only edits from an IP so I don't bother warning a one-time vandal.  After a second or third vandal edit within a short time, I'll leave a {{tl|test}} if the edit is fairly benign like \"hi\" or \"aaaaaaaa\" or some other genuine test - or I'll leave {{tl|test2}} if the people are obviously up to no good.  If it continues, depending on how rapid the IP is vandalizing, I'll either go to {{tl|test3}} or jump to {{tl|test4}} after that - whatever I think will end the vandalism most quickly.  If there are more than five or six vandal edits within the last 10 minutes and more than one warning on the IP's talk page, it seems like most admins will block.  Yes, you should try to \"group\" the warnings but, if the person clearly isn't going to stop from warnings, it's time for [[WP:AIV]].  The final goal is to stop the vandalism.  There's really no perfect recipe for accomplishing that, esp. with so many admins using so many different standards.  Just don't be offended if an admin refuses to block.  Feel free to ask me or another admin if you want more specifics.  \u2014 +++$+++ :For logged-in accounts, I usually block quickly, especially when every edit is obvious vandalism.  For anonymous accounts, more care needs to be taken.  Many vandal edits are the only edits from an IP so I don't bother warning a one-time vandal.  After a second or third vandal edit within a short time, I'll leave a {{tl|test}} if the edit is fairly benign like "hi" or "aaaaaaaa" or some other genuine test - or I'll leave {{tl|test2}} if the people are obviously up to no good.  If it continues, depending on how rapid the IP is vandalizing, I'll either go to {{tl|test3}} or jump to {{tl|test4}} after that - whatever I think will end the vandalism most quickly.  If there are more than five or six vandal edits within the last 10 minutes and more than one warning on the IP's talk page, it seems like most admins will block.  Yes, you should try to "group" the warnings but, if the person clearly isn't going to stop from warnings, it's time for [[WP:AIV]].  The final goal is to stop the vandalism.  There's really no perfect recipe for accomplishing that, esp. with so many admins using so many different standards.  Just don't be offended if an admin refuses to block.  Feel free to ask me or another admin if you want more specifics.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 02:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
482618 +++$+++ Sanfranman59 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482616 +++$+++ 482617 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.174729140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the quick feedback and happy patrolling! -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the quick feedback and happy patrolling! --[[User:Sanfranman59|Sanfranman59]] 02:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

274258 +++$+++ T3Smile +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-04 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.194208140E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, could you please discuss [[internet cafe]] article with me before you go and delete material?  Its not advertising as the project chidiac was involved in  ceased in 2006, as you can read.  Its an important piece of historical information and references for the article, brief and to the point.  I am curently asking others to contribute more photos etc. to balance the pictures of cafes to a more global point of view (see discussion), but no contributors are making themselves known and most of the cafes nominated in yahoo competiton are now closed or have moved out of the internet cafe business!  Hopefully in time we'll find more people will contribute material to it, I have my fingers crossed, but we cant be deleting important historical information and references.  Ta. -- +++$+++ Hi Sarah, could you please discuss [[internet cafe]] article with me before you go and delete material?  Its not advertising as the project chidiac was involved in  ceased in 2006, as you can read.  Its an important piece of historical information and references for the article, brief and to the point.  I am curently asking others to contribute more photos etc. to balance the pictures of cafes to a more global point of view (see discussion), but no contributors are making themselves known and most of the cafes nominated in yahoo competiton are now closed or have moved out of the internet cafe business!  Hopefully in time we'll find more people will contribute material to it, I have my fingers crossed, but we cant be deleting important historical information and references.  Ta. --[[User:T3Smile|T3Smile]] 12:29, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
274259 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274258 +++$+++ 274258 +++$+++ 2007-11-04 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.194242640E09 +++$+++ Of course it's advertising and self-promotion. There's been a concerted effort to worm \"Anthony Chiriac\" into a range of articles. I think you might be operating under some mistaken beliefs about the purpose of Wikipedia. It isn't to promote yourself. I remove spam, self-promotional material and advertising wherever I find it, and no, I won't get your permission before doing so.  +++$+++ :Of course it's advertising and self-promotion. There's been a concerted effort to worm "Anthony Chiriac" into a range of articles. I think you might be operating under some mistaken beliefs about the purpose of Wikipedia. It isn't to promote yourself. I remove spam, self-promotional material and advertising wherever I find it, and no, I won't get your permission before doing so. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 22:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

274260 +++$+++ T3Smile +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-05 07:38:00 +++$+++ 1.194277080E09 +++$+++ Sarah, but I am not Anthony Chidiac.  And you are changing my edits.  Please [[Assume Good Faith]] before you make a hurtful allegation without any basis of truth.  Ta  T-- +++$+++ Sarah, but I am not Anthony Chidiac.  And you are changing my edits.  Please [[Assume Good Faith]] before you make a hurtful allegation without any basis of truth.  Ta  T--[[User:T3Smile|T3Smile]] 07:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
274261 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274260 +++$+++ 274260 +++$+++ 2007-11-05 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.194278640E09 +++$+++ I don't care either way if you are Anthony Chidiac or not. The person you are writing about is not notable and therefore the material is not suitable for Wikipedia. I recommend you put the article on a blog if you are intent on publishing it.  +++$+++ :I don't care either way if you are Anthony Chidiac or not. The person you are writing about is not notable and therefore the material is not suitable for Wikipedia. I recommend you put the article on a blog if you are intent on publishing it. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

438926 +++$+++ Ezhiki +++$+++ Buckshot06 +++$+++ 438926 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I don't mind helping you out with this, but I should admit that the military terminology is not something I am very comfortable translating (I am capable of  translating it, but I can't guarantee the quality of the output).  However, I could supply the links to the articles about the populated places, if that helps you any.  I wish I could help with the airports as well, but I don't really have anything to look them up properly, so it's going to be hit-or-miss there.  Let me know what you want me to do.\u2014 +++$+++ I don't mind helping you out with this, but I should admit that the military terminology is not something I am very comfortable translating (I am capable of  translating it, but I can't guarantee the quality of the output).  However, I could supply the links to the articles about the populated places, if that helps you any.  I wish I could help with the airports as well, but I don't really have anything to look them up properly, so it's going to be hit-or-miss there.  Let me know what you want me to do.—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); 17:21, June&nbsp;22, 2009 (UTC)
438927 +++$+++ Ezhiki +++$+++ Buckshot06 +++$+++ 438926 +++$+++ 438926 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I've translated the portion you requested, but I want to once more re-emphasize that I wasn't very comfortable with the quality of my translation&mdash;it felt as if I was guessing, rather than knowledgeably translating, way too often.  I hope the translation helps you get the idea of what all those facilities are, so you could then copy-edit it to conform with the established English military terminology.  Let me know if there is anything else I can do.  Cheers,\u2014 +++$+++ :I've translated the portion you requested, but I want to once more re-emphasize that I wasn't very comfortable with the quality of my translation&mdash;it felt as if I was guessing, rather than knowledgeably translating, way too often.  I hope the translation helps you get the idea of what all those facilities are, so you could then copy-edit it to conform with the established English military terminology.  Let me know if there is anything else I can do.  Cheers,—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); 19:25, June&nbsp;24, 2009 (UTC)

274262 +++$+++ T3Smile +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-05 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.194279600E09 +++$+++ Sarah, I'm not commenting on the person, but the concept in [[internet cafe]] and citing it with credible sources.  Please provide reason as to why you keep reverting it without discussion.  That is the main issue, you need to get off the subject of chidiac and read the references.  thankyou. T-- +++$+++ Sarah, I'm not commenting on the person, but the concept in [[internet cafe]] and citing it with credible sources.  Please provide reason as to why you keep reverting it without discussion.  That is the main issue, you need to get off the subject of chidiac and read the references.  thankyou. T--[[User:T3Smile|T3Smile]] 08:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
274263 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274262 +++$+++ 274262 +++$+++ 2007-11-05 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.194283560E09 +++$+++ I'm reverting that material because the article is about internet cafes and slapping that paragraph and the various images into the middle of it looks promotional. Are we going to do that for every internet cafe in the world? Every cafe which is a finalist in a competition? What do you think the article will look like?  +++$+++ :I'm reverting that material because the article is about internet cafes and slapping that paragraph and the various images into the middle of it looks promotional. Are we going to do that for every internet cafe in the world? Every cafe which is a finalist in a competition? What do you think the article will look like? [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

274264 +++$+++ T3Smile +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-05 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.194285300E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, please stop making false accusations of me, and reverting my edits.  The edits made have citations and credible media behind it.  Could you please explain \"promotional\" when the article information is used as a historical resource and the cafe itself doesnt exist anymore?  Its discussing the evolution of the internet cafe, not a person, and its written like the article it cites (from the Age), a credible source as per guidelines.  Instead of continuing this revert war please put the article back to the state I left it in and put your thoughts on the discussion page, like everyone else does.  Being an admin does not make you privy to making such edits without discussion, especially when the content in question is relevant, properly referenced and cited.  The rest of the garb in the article isn't, but I am in the process of cleaning it up and over time the article will progress (if the internet cafe in its current form is still around).  The competition itself comes up once every ten years and is run by a credible company called \"yahoo\".  I tried getting more info about other cafes that were yahoo finalists worldwide but '''no credible information with citable references exist'''.  Nobody \"won\" the competition.  There was a finalist in each country that entered.  I was not going to start up an article about \"o3 convergence cafe\" or \"opulent\" as I believe general consensus if I did such would be to merge article into internet cafe.  I'm saving time.  Please revert article back to how it was with the addition or cite, or, alternatively, rewrite what you think is promotional to concur with the article.  Ta  T.-- +++$+++ Hi Sarah, please stop making false accusations of me, and reverting my edits.  The edits made have citations and credible media behind it.  Could you please explain "promotional" when the article information is used as a historical resource and the cafe itself doesnt exist anymore?  Its discussing the evolution of the internet cafe, not a person, and its written like the article it cites (from the Age), a credible source as per guidelines.  Instead of continuing this revert war please put the article back to the state I left it in and put your thoughts on the discussion page, like everyone else does.  Being an admin does not make you privy to making such edits without discussion, especially when the content in question is relevant, properly referenced and cited.  The rest of the garb in the article isn't, but I am in the process of cleaning it up and over time the article will progress (if the internet cafe in its current form is still around).  The competition itself comes up once every ten years and is run by a credible company called "yahoo".  I tried getting more info about other cafes that were yahoo finalists worldwide but '''no credible information with citable references exist'''.  Nobody "won" the competition.  There was a finalist in each country that entered.  I was not going to start up an article about "o3 convergence cafe" or "opulent" as I believe general consensus if I did such would be to merge article into internet cafe.  I'm saving time.  Please revert article back to how it was with the addition or cite, or, alternatively, rewrite what you think is promotional to concur with the article.  Ta  T.--[[User:T3Smile|T3Smile]] 09:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
274265 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274264 +++$+++ 274264 +++$+++ 2007-11-05 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.194286080E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry but I'm not going to revert it back. I do not believe that material or the images belong in that article and I won't help you compromise Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :I'm sorry but I'm not going to revert it back. I do not believe that material or the images belong in that article and I won't help you compromise Wikipedia. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
274266 +++$+++ Jreferee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274264 +++$+++ 274264 +++$+++ 2007-11-06 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.194392760E09 +++$+++ {{User3|T3Smile|T3Smile}} - Blocked as sockpuppet. See [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Achidiac|SSP Achidiac]] --  +++$+++ *{{User3|T3Smile|T3Smile}} - Blocked as sockpuppet. See [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Achidiac|SSP Achidiac]] -- [[User:Jreferee|<font face="Kristen ITC" color="2A52BE">'''Jreferee '''</font>]][[User_talk:Jreferee|<font color="007BA7">  t</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Jreferee|<font color="007FFF">c</font>]] 15:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
274267 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274264 +++$+++ 274266 +++$+++ 2007-11-06 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.194395220E09 +++$+++ Thanks Jreferee. I don't think any of us were surprised about that. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Thanks Jreferee. I don't think any of us were surprised about that. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 16:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

536409 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-30 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.154249580E09 +++$+++ Excellent coordination on Longhornliving, its like we read each others mind.-- +++$+++ Excellent coordination on Longhornliving, its like we read each others mind.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 01:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
536410 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536409 +++$+++ 536409 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.154249760E09 +++$+++ I did no such thing. I always preview and create the entry then save both together (so there is no time for a red link). You just beat me to the punch on saving. I'd completely forgotten that I'd gotten a little javascript tool to do this automatically I've been meaning to try out.-- +++$+++ :I did no such thing. I always preview and create the entry then save both together (so there is no time for a red link). You just beat me to the punch on saving. I'd completely forgotten that I'd gotten a little javascript tool to do this automatically I've been meaning to try out.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 01:56, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
536411 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536409 +++$+++ 536410 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.154250300E09 +++$+++ Last time I did new page patrol I had one. I'd really like CSD to cover all non-notable things that don't assert notability beyond people\/bands and cover things like businesses, websites, and products.-- +++$+++ ::Last time I did new page patrol I had one. I'd really like CSD to cover all non-notable things that don't assert notability beyond people/bands and cover things like businesses, websites, and products.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 02:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

274268 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-06 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.194339420E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[user:Nat|'''nat''']] <sup>[[user talk:Nat|'''Alo!''']] <span class="plainlinks">[irc://irc.freenode.net/UserNat,isnick '''Salut!''']</span> [[Special:Blockip/Nat|'''Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?!''']]</sup> 00:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
274269 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274268 +++$+++ 274268 +++$+++ 2007-11-06 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.194395400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 16:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

536413 +++$+++ The Ungovernable Force +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-30 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.154272980E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Cafe Esperanza.JPG|thumb|left|200px|...while enjoying your cappuccino]] [[Image:Cookieplateful.jpg|thumb|left|220px|and ''full plate'' of cookies!]] <font color=\"Black\">'''The'''<\/font>  +++$+++ [[Image:Cafe Esperanza.JPG|thumb|left|200px|...while enjoying your cappuccino]] [[Image:Cookieplateful.jpg|thumb|left|220px|and ''full plate'' of cookies!]] <font color="Black">'''The'''</font> [[User:The Ungovernable Force|<font color="green">'''Ungovernable'''</font>]] [[User talk:The Ungovernable Force|<font color="black">'''Force'''</font>]] 08:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
536414 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536413 +++$+++ 536413 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.154273280E09 +++$+++ Aww, thanks! And to think, I only cheated a ''little''. :)  +++$+++ : Aww, thanks! And to think, I only cheated a ''little''. :) [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''review me!''']]</sub></span>) 08:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
536415 +++$+++ The Ungovernable Force +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536413 +++$+++ 536414 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.154273520E09 +++$+++ I was wondering if someone would think of looking them up! I should tell you, those cookies were poisoned....<font color=\"Black\">'''The'''<\/font>  +++$+++ ::I was wondering if someone would think of looking them up! I should tell you, those cookies were poisoned....<font color="Black">'''The'''</font> [[User:The Ungovernable Force|<font color="green">'''Ungovernable'''</font>]] [[User talk:The Ungovernable Force|<font color="black">'''Force'''</font>]] 08:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
536416 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536413 +++$+++ 536415 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 08:35:00 +++$+++ 1.154273700E09 +++$+++ Damn! You should have told me before I fed them to your dog... :)  +++$+++ :::Damn! You should have told me before I fed them to your dog... :) [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''review me!''']]</sub></span>) 08:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
536417 +++$+++ The Ungovernable Force +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536413 +++$+++ 536416 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.154273940E09 +++$+++ Oh no, Minnie! That's why she almost threw up earlier today! I guess she got it out of her system so she'll be ok (wait, she ate her vomit, so maybe she'll still be sick). Well, it wasn't very strong anyway. And btw, how did you find my dog? <font color=\"Black\">'''The'''<\/font>  +++$+++ ::::Oh no, Minnie! That's why she almost threw up earlier today! I guess she got it out of her system so she'll be ok (wait, she ate her vomit, so maybe she'll still be sick). Well, it wasn't very strong anyway. And btw, how did you find my dog? <font color="Black">'''The'''</font> [[User:The Ungovernable Force|<font color="green">'''Ungovernable'''</font>]] [[User talk:The Ungovernable Force|<font color="black">'''Force'''</font>]] 08:39, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
536418 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536413 +++$+++ 536417 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 08:44:00 +++$+++ 1.154274240E09 +++$+++ Honestly... I thought she was a bit of a [[Dog|bitch]]. Buh-dum-''ching!''  +++$+++ :::::Honestly... I thought she was a bit of a [[Dog|bitch]]. Buh-dum-''ching!'' [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''review me!''']]</sub></span>) 08:44, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
536419 +++$+++ The Ungovernable Force +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536413 +++$+++ 536418 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 08:58:00 +++$+++ 1.154275080E09 +++$+++ Yeah, well your pet donkey is an ass! And if you don't have a pet donkey, well, uh, hmm, I don't really know. How about that, huh? But anyway, my dog is totally awesome. She's a [[Jack Russel Terrier]] but she is pretty mellow and easy to handle. And she's just ''soooooo'' adorable! <font color=\"Black\">'''The'''<\/font>  +++$+++ ::::::Yeah, well your pet donkey is an ass! And if you don't have a pet donkey, well, uh, hmm, I don't really know. How about that, huh? But anyway, my dog is totally awesome. She's a [[Jack Russel Terrier]] but she is pretty mellow and easy to handle. And she's just ''soooooo'' adorable! <font color="Black">'''The'''</font> [[User:The Ungovernable Force|<font color="green">'''Ungovernable'''</font>]] [[User talk:The Ungovernable Force|<font color="black">'''Force'''</font>]] 08:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
536420 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536413 +++$+++ 536419 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.154275320E09 +++$+++ Well, I did know a guy who had a pet donkey.. who'da thunk it? I've never owned a dog (sadly :( ), although my dad ''does'' own an adorable black cat named Taffy. My brother used to own a [[Labradoodle]] named Spike (after the [[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]] character), but I rarely saw him. Sad. :(  +++$+++ :::::::Well, I did know a guy who had a pet donkey.. who'da thunk it? I've never owned a dog (sadly :( ), although my dad ''does'' own an adorable black cat named Taffy. My brother used to own a [[Labradoodle]] named Spike (after the [[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]] character), but I rarely saw him. Sad. :( [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''review me!''']]</sub></span>) 09:02, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
536421 +++$+++ Phaedriel +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536413 +++$+++ 536420 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.154322300E09 +++$+++ It is awesome to see two great guys like you have become friends thanks to the Soundtrack project :) You rule, TUF and Randy! [[User:Phaedriel|<b><font color=\"#00BB00\">Phaedriel<\/font><\/b>]] <b><font color=\"#FF0000\">\u2665<\/font><\/b>  +++$+++ ::::::::It is awesome to see two great guys like you have become friends thanks to the Soundtrack project :) You rule, TUF and Randy! [[User:Phaedriel|<b><font color="#00BB00">Phaedriel</font></b>]] <b><font color="#FF0000">♥</font></b> [[User:Phaedriel/Soundtrack of Wikipedians|<font color="green"><small>The Wiki Soundtrack!</small></font><font color="#FF0000">♪</font>]] - 22:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
536422 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536413 +++$+++ 536421 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.154364360E09 +++$+++ I like to think of it as a match made in heaven. :)  +++$+++ :::::::::I like to think of it as a match made in heaven. :) [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''raves''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''review me!''']]</sub></span>) 09:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

274270 +++$+++ Kwsn +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-06 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.194392640E09 +++$+++ [[User_talk:64.229.29.190]] is asking for an unblock, which was under [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3A64.229.0.0%2F16 this range block].  Could you look into it? <font face=\"comic sans ms\"> +++$+++ [[User_talk:64.229.29.190]] is asking for an unblock, which was under [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3A64.229.0.0%2F16 this range block].  Could you look into it? <font face="comic sans ms">[[User:Kwsn|<span style="color: #000080">'''Kwsn'''</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Kwsn|<span style="color: #000080 ">(Ni!)</span>]]</small></font> 15:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
274271 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274270 +++$+++ 274270 +++$+++ 2007-11-06 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.194394860E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for letting me know, Kwsn. Very much appreciated. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thank you very much for letting me know, Kwsn. Very much appreciated. :) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 16:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

274272 +++$+++ Josborne2382 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-09 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.194617880E09 +++$+++ I Appreciate it!  +++$+++ I Appreciate it! [[User:Josborne2382|Josborne2382]] 06:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
274273 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274272 +++$+++ 274272 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.194617940E09 +++$+++ No problems at all. Cheers,  +++$+++ :No problems at all. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:19, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

570000 +++$+++ Matt Crypto +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-28 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.125216240E09 +++$+++ David -- the merge sounds good to me. Nice work on the hash list\/tree images, btw!  +++$+++ David -- the merge sounds good to me. Nice work on the hash list/tree images, btw! [[User:Matt Crypto|&mdash; Matt <small>Crypto</small>]] 01:04, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
570001 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570000 +++$+++ 570000 +++$+++ 2005-08-28 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.125289980E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I only got positive comments about the merge so far. Guess I will merge in [[Tiger-Tree Hash]] in a day or two. (Or perhaps tonight if I get impatient.) And thanks for the comment about the pictures. I enjoy making diagrams to help my explanations. I have seen there is a need for pictures on many crypto pages so I might take a crack at making and adding some pics on some other crypto pages some day. -- +++$+++ :Yeah, I only got positive comments about the merge so far. Guess I will merge in [[Tiger-Tree Hash]] in a day or two. (Or perhaps tonight if I get impatient.) And thanks for the comment about the pictures. I enjoy making diagrams to help my explanations. I have seen there is a need for pictures on many crypto pages so I might take a crack at making and adding some pics on some other crypto pages some day. --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 21:33, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

274274 +++$+++ HarrisonB +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.194455700E09 +++$+++ Hello Sarah, remember me? It is HarrisonB and I wanted to catch up. How are you? <font face=\"Gill Sans MT\"> +++$+++ Hello Sarah, remember me? It is HarrisonB and I wanted to catch up. How are you? <font face="Gill Sans MT">[[User_talk: HarrisonB|HarrisonB]]</font> - <small>[[Special:Contributions/HarrisonB|Conributions]]</small> 09:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
274275 +++$+++ HarrisonB +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274274 +++$+++ 274274 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.194632400E09 +++$+++ Hello? I added the preceded message a couple of days ago so I wanted to make sure that you got this message. <font face=\"Gill Sans MT\"> +++$+++ *Hello? I added the preceded message a couple of days ago so I wanted to make sure that you got this message. <font face="Gill Sans MT">[[User_talk: HarrisonB|HarrisonB]]</font> - <small>[[Special:Contributions/HarrisonB|Conributions]]</small> 10:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
274276 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274274 +++$+++ 274275 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.194696900E09 +++$+++ Hi Harrison. Yes, I did receive your message, I've just been very busy and caught up with other things. Sorry about that. Nice to hear from you and see you editing again. I hope that you will be able to edit more over the summer holidays. I hope you and your family are all well. Have a nice weekend and enjoy the nice weather. :) Best wishes,  +++$+++ **Hi Harrison. Yes, I did receive your message, I've just been very busy and caught up with other things. Sorry about that. Nice to hear from you and see you editing again. I hope that you will be able to edit more over the summer holidays. I hope you and your family are all well. Have a nice weekend and enjoy the nice weather. :) Best wishes, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

482619 +++$+++ Persian Poet Gal +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-25 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.174809720E09 +++$+++ Hello Wknight94.  Recently there has been a persistent sockpuppeteer about known as [[User:Turok 1]].  Some of the edit histories of the pages his socks had edited had some IPs appearing in them that were most likely his.  I blocked around three of the IPs if you look at my [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Persian+Poet+Gal&page= block log].  This guy seems like he is utilizing a dynamic IP and that a range block may be of some use.  I'm completely clueless in regards to range blocking and I hope you don't mind me asking for your assistance.  Thanks. +++$+++ Hello Wknight94.  Recently there has been a persistent sockpuppeteer about known as [[User:Turok 1]].  Some of the edit histories of the pages his socks had edited had some IPs appearing in them that were most likely his.  I blocked around three of the IPs if you look at my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Persian+Poet+Gal&page= block log].  This guy seems like he is utilizing a dynamic IP and that a range block may be of some use.  I'm completely clueless in regards to range blocking and I hope you don't mind me asking for your assistance.  Thanks.[[User:Persian Poet Gal|<font face="comic sans ms"><font color="purple"><i><b>¤~Persian Poet Gal</b></i></font></font>]] <font color="purple">[[User talk:Persian Poet Gal|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]</font> 01:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
482620 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.174810200E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately I don't think a range block is going to help you in this case.  A range block is in order only if the '''beginning''' of the IPs are similar.  Look at the edits to [[California Gold Rush]] from March 14 for an example.  All of the IPs began with 167.128.58.xxx so I did a range block from 167.128.58.0 through 167.128.58.255.  That only covered 256 IP addresses and did the trick well.  In your case, the IPs begin 70.xxx.xxx.xxx, 72.xxx.xxx.xxx, and 74.xxx.xxx.xxx.  A range block covering all those would hit millions of IP addresses (literally I think).  What you may have there is a case of open proxies - but I've never gotten a clear explanation of how to handle those.  You might want to semi-protect or protect the vandalized articles instead.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Unfortunately I don't think a range block is going to help you in this case.  A range block is in order only if the '''beginning''' of the IPs are similar.  Look at the edits to [[California Gold Rush]] from March 14 for an example.  All of the IPs began with 167.128.58.xxx so I did a range block from 167.128.58.0 through 167.128.58.255.  That only covered 256 IP addresses and did the trick well.  In your case, the IPs begin 70.xxx.xxx.xxx, 72.xxx.xxx.xxx, and 74.xxx.xxx.xxx.  A range block covering all those would hit millions of IP addresses (literally I think).  What you may have there is a case of open proxies - but I've never gotten a clear explanation of how to handle those.  You might want to semi-protect or protect the vandalized articles instead.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 01:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
482621 +++$+++ Persian Poet Gal +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.174810740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the answer.  As you can see I'm clueless.  I'll take your advice and protect the articles. +++$+++ ::*Thanks for the answer.  As you can see I'm clueless.  I'll take your advice and protect the articles.[[User:Persian Poet Gal|<font face="comic sans ms"><font color="purple"><i><b>¤~Persian Poet Gal</b></i></font></font>]] <font color="purple">[[User talk:Persian Poet Gal|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]</font> 01:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
482622 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.174811280E09 +++$+++ No problem.  I happen to be in the computer software business so I'm relatively familiar with IP addresses and the like.  You can read over [[Classless Inter-Domain Routing]] to see how IP ranges are denoted.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::**No problem.  I happen to be in the computer software business so I'm relatively familiar with IP addresses and the like.  You can read over [[Classless Inter-Domain Routing]] to see how IP ranges are denoted.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 01:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
482623 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.174815300E09 +++$+++ What I was trying to type in my last edit summary (but I hit the return key prematurely) was where else have you seen \"Has this article wetted your apeptite for science?\"  Your enthusiasm is appreciated but maybe you want to slow down a bit.  Read over [[WP:MOS]] and its subpages.  You'll see things like the fact that section headings aren't supposed to be in bold face.  Also read over [[WP:V]] which says that you need to cite sources for facts that you add.  Let me know if you have any specific questions.  \u2014 +++$+++ :What I was trying to type in my last edit summary (but I hit the return key prematurely) was where else have you seen "Has this article wetted your apeptite for science?"  Your enthusiasm is appreciated but maybe you want to slow down a bit.  Read over [[WP:MOS]] and its subpages.  You'll see things like the fact that section headings aren't supposed to be in bold face.  Also read over [[WP:V]] which says that you need to cite sources for facts that you add.  Let me know if you have any specific questions.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 02:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
482624 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.174816320E09 +++$+++ Honestly, I doubt a \"Learn More\" section would catch on here.  Many articles have a \"See also\" section with links to related articles and an \"External links\" section to external educational resources.  You might want to ask around at [[WP:WPSci]] though.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Honestly, I doubt a "Learn More" section would catch on here.  Many articles have a "See also" section with links to related articles and an "External links" section to external educational resources.  You might want to ask around at [[WP:WPSci]] though.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 02:52, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
482625 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.174940160E09 +++$+++ Oh, on a sidenote, have you considered getting a bot to archive for you? I liked doing it myself, but I finally realized, \"Why do it manually, when you can save time having it done automatically?\" I tried [[User:MiszaBot III]], and it's worked fine. Just an FYI. :) -- +++$+++ :Oh, on a sidenote, have you considered getting a bot to archive for you? I liked doing it myself, but I finally realized, "Why do it manually, when you can save time having it done automatically?" I tried [[User:MiszaBot III]], and it's worked fine. Just an FYI. :) --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 13:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
482626 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 482625 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.174941060E09 +++$+++ My pleasure!  As far as bot archiving, I just don't like how ''often'' it archives.  I prefer to have just a few huge archives instead of dozens of little tiny archives like the bots seem to do.  I think I'm too much of a control freak for that!  :)  But yes, I'm a little overdue, sorry.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::My pleasure!  As far as bot archiving, I just don't like how ''often'' it archives.  I prefer to have just a few huge archives instead of dozens of little tiny archives like the bots seem to do.  I think I'm too much of a control freak for that!  :)  But yes, I'm a little overdue, sorry.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 13:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
482627 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.174955940E09 +++$+++ That's amazing. I've ''never'' had a walrus in ''my'' circle of friends, nor even as a casual acquaintance.  +++$+++ *That's amazing. I've ''never'' had a walrus in ''my'' circle of friends, nor even as a casual acquaintance. [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 17:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
482628 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 482627 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.174957680E09 +++$+++ Gee, and people wonder why I'm against [[:Category:Wikipedians against anonymous editing|anonymous editing]]. *heavy sigh* -- +++$+++ **Gee, and people wonder why I'm against [[:Category:Wikipedians against anonymous editing|anonymous editing]]. *heavy sigh* --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 18:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
482629 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 482628 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.174957920E09 +++$+++ I fully agree. Now all we have to do is convince Mr. Wales. However, I would allow that a walrus would eat a Filet-O-Fish, though I doubt he would order it on drive-through. I recall as a kid going to the zoo, and throwing marshmallows to the polar bears. Marshmallows are not normally part of the polar bear's diet, as they do not grow in the arctic regions as a general rule, yet the bears happily scarfed them up in captivity. And all in all, a fishwich is probably nutritionally better for a captured animal than a bag of marshmallows would be.  +++$+++ ***I fully agree. Now all we have to do is convince Mr. Wales. However, I would allow that a walrus would eat a Filet-O-Fish, though I doubt he would order it on drive-through. I recall as a kid going to the zoo, and throwing marshmallows to the polar bears. Marshmallows are not normally part of the polar bear's diet, as they do not grow in the arctic regions as a general rule, yet the bears happily scarfed them up in captivity. And all in all, a fishwich is probably nutritionally better for a captured animal than a bag of marshmallows would be. [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 18:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
482630 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 482628 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.174958100E09 +++$+++ Do what I do: cross your fingers and hope that some of the anon's become either productive editors or at least humorous vandals.  \u2014 +++$+++ ***Do what I do: cross your fingers and hope that some of the anon's become either productive editors or at least humorous vandals.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 18:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
482631 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482619 +++$+++ 482630 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.174974780E09 +++$+++ It's worth a shot. Meanwhile, I'm still marveling at that guy who's on a first-name basis with Wally.  +++$+++ ****It's worth a shot. Meanwhile, I'm still marveling at that guy who's on a first-name basis with Wally. [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 22:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

274278 +++$+++ Pdfpdf +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-13 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.194986760E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but due to my ignorance, I'm rather confused. Periodically I \"talk\" to \"Melsaran\", but I see that username has been \"blocked indefinitely\", for reasons I don't comprehend. Can you enlighten me please? If so, thank you in anticipation,  +++$+++ Sorry, but due to my ignorance, I'm rather confused. Periodically I "talk" to "Melsaran", but I see that username has been "blocked indefinitely", for reasons I don't comprehend. Can you enlighten me please? If so, thank you in anticipation, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] 12:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
274279 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274278 +++$+++ 274278 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.194995100E09 +++$+++ Is this is in reference to something I have said or done, or are you just asking me as a random admin? If it's about something I have said, you are going to have to point me to the diff. As for Melsaran, he was blocked by the Arbitration Committee because he was caught using multiple disruptive sockpuppets. This was the notice from the Arbitration Committee: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=165213706] He knows why he was blocked and he needs to contact the Arbitration Commitee and resolve it with them.  +++$+++ :Is this is in reference to something I have said or done, or are you just asking me as a random admin? If it's about something I have said, you are going to have to point me to the diff. As for Melsaran, he was blocked by the Arbitration Committee because he was caught using multiple disruptive sockpuppets. This was the notice from the Arbitration Committee: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=165213706] He knows why he was blocked and he needs to contact the Arbitration Commitee and resolve it with them. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 15:05, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

274280 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-13 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.195011540E09 +++$+++ You have one. :)  +++$+++ You have one. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
274281 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274280 +++$+++ 274280 +++$+++ 2007-11-14 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.195077300E09 +++$+++ Gotcha! Ooooh wow! That's awesome! I feel so honored to know such a famous person! :)  +++$+++ :Gotcha! Ooooh wow! That's awesome! I feel so honored to know such a famous person! :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
274282 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274280 +++$+++ 274281 +++$+++ 2007-11-14 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.195090800E09 +++$+++ Heh, heh; I thought you'd like it! :) Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Heh, heh; I thought you'd like it! :) Thanks! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

274283 +++$+++ Porcupine +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-14 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.195083060E09 +++$+++ I think that my summary on [[WP:ANI|ANI]] covers the reason for my 'disruption' - if politely asking to be blocked can be considered disruption. As for the userpage, either it should be gone or it should be there. The consensus was, I believe, that it should be gone - Martinp23's restoration of it was just [[WP:COI|perfectly timed]] with a dispute we were having; this is, I consider, an [[WP:WHEEL|abuse]] of admin powers. As for my remarks about Nick, he genuinely is; he accused me of harassment and deliberate evasion of my history - when I asked him to provide diffs of the harassment, and pointed out that I have taken all reasonable measures to maintain the link between my accounts, he ignored me. That puts him low-down in my estimation; it's [[WP:CIV|just]] [[WP:NPA|rude]]. Do you not agree that refusal to back up claims of harassment and intentional bad-faith sockpuppeteering is rude?--[[User:Porcupine|Porcupine]] ([[User talk:Porcupine|prickle me!]] '''\xb7''' [[Special:Contributions\/Porcupine|contribs]] '''\xb7'''  +++$+++ I think that my summary on [[WP:ANI|ANI]] covers the reason for my 'disruption' - if politely asking to be blocked can be considered disruption. As for the userpage, either it should be gone or it should be there. The consensus was, I believe, that it should be gone - Martinp23's restoration of it was just [[WP:COI|perfectly timed]] with a dispute we were having; this is, I consider, an [[WP:WHEEL|abuse]] of admin powers. As for my remarks about Nick, he genuinely is; he accused me of harassment and deliberate evasion of my history - when I asked him to provide diffs of the harassment, and pointed out that I have taken all reasonable measures to maintain the link between my accounts, he ignored me. That puts him low-down in my estimation; it's [[WP:CIV|just]] [[WP:NPA|rude]]. Do you not agree that refusal to back up claims of harassment and intentional bad-faith sockpuppeteering is rude?--[[User:Porcupine|Porcupine]] ([[User talk:Porcupine|prickle me!]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Porcupine|contribs]] '''·''' [[User:Porcupine/Current-status|status]]) 15:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
274284 +++$+++ Porcupine +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274283 +++$+++ 274283 +++$+++ 2007-11-14 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.195094820E09 +++$+++ NB:- in a later email from Martinp23, he claims that his restoration of the userpages was coincidentally timed, and he'd been intending to do it for weeks. I therefore [[WP:AGF|retract my statement]] above, assuming that Martin is being honest.--[[User:Porcupine|Porcupine]] ([[User talk:Porcupine|prickle me!]] '''\xb7''' [[Special:Contributions\/Porcupine|contribs]] '''\xb7'''  +++$+++ :NB:- in a later email from Martinp23, he claims that his restoration of the userpages was coincidentally timed, and he'd been intending to do it for weeks. I therefore [[WP:AGF|retract my statement]] above, assuming that Martin is being honest.--[[User:Porcupine|Porcupine]] ([[User talk:Porcupine|prickle me!]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Porcupine|contribs]] '''·''' [[User:Porcupine/Current-status|status]]) 18:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

536428 +++$+++ Srose +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-08 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.155088080E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much for commenting on my [[Wikipedia:Editor review\/Srose|editor review]].  I really appreciate your kind words and your suggestions. :) Thank you!!!  +++$+++ Thank you so much for commenting on my [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Srose|editor review]].  I really appreciate your kind words and your suggestions. :) Thank you!!! [[User:Srose|<b>Srose</b>]] [[User talk:Srose|<font color="hotpink">(talk)</font>]] 18:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
536429 +++$+++ Srose +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536428 +++$+++ 536428 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.155201000E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you enjoyed the smile!!!  I see you even made a nice things page - that's a good idea; I may have to steal it! ;) Your response to my editor review was no \"small thing\"; it's truly appreciated: you didn't have to take time out of your wikiday to let me know what I can improve on and what I'm doing right!!  I expected to get no responses; most people get only one or two anyway.  I'd also like to let you know that your statements on my talk page made me blush! :) It's nice to feel so appreciated. Have a great day (night?)!! -- +++$+++ *I'm glad you enjoyed the smile!!!  I see you even made a nice things page - that's a good idea; I may have to steal it! ;) Your response to my editor review was no "small thing"; it's truly appreciated: you didn't have to take time out of your wikiday to let me know what I can improve on and what I'm doing right!!  I expected to get no responses; most people get only one or two anyway.  I'd also like to let you know that your statements on my talk page made me blush! :) It's nice to feel so appreciated. Have a great day (night?)!! --[[User:Srose|<b>Srose</b>]] [[User talk:Srose|<font color="hotpink">(<b>talk</b>)</font>]] 02:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

274285 +++$+++ Shaidar cuebiyar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-11 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.194792360E09 +++$+++ Perhaps the relevant sentence in [[David Reyne]] needs further work? +++$+++ Perhaps the relevant sentence in [[David Reyne]] needs further work?[[User:Shaidar cuebiyar|Shaidar cuebiyar]] 06:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
274286 +++$+++ Shaidar cuebiyar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274285 +++$+++ 274285 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.194793020E09 +++$+++ Sorry \"Best\" New Talent according to 1985 Logies page. +++$+++ :Sorry "Best" New Talent according to 1985 Logies page.[[User:Shaidar cuebiyar|Shaidar cuebiyar]] 06:57, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
274287 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274285 +++$+++ 274286 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.194806940E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Shaidar. All the edits that I made to the [[David Reyne]] and [[Kim Watkins]] articles were based on personal feedback and information provided by David Reyne and Kim Watkins themselves when they recently did an interview and segment on Wikipedia for ''9 am with David and Kim''. I took the corrections they provided us with and independently verified all of them (for policy reasons) with articles I obtained from Factiva and the Australian New Zealand Reference Center. I am certainly happy to make available a copy of the full Fidgeon article, but I cannot post it on-site due to copyright and you do not seem to have provided Wikipedia with an email address. The pertinent sentence, however, is: \"In 1984, he won the Best New Talent Logie for his role of Martin Kabel in the ABC drama Sweet and Sour.\" Thank you for contacting me. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Thanks, Shaidar. All the edits that I made to the [[David Reyne]] and [[Kim Watkins]] articles were based on personal feedback and information provided by David Reyne and Kim Watkins themselves when they recently did an interview and segment on Wikipedia for ''9 am with David and Kim''. I took the corrections they provided us with and independently verified all of them (for policy reasons) with articles I obtained from Factiva and the Australian New Zealand Reference Center. I am certainly happy to make available a copy of the full Fidgeon article, but I cannot post it on-site due to copyright and you do not seem to have provided Wikipedia with an email address. The pertinent sentence, however, is: "In 1984, he won the Best New Talent Logie for his role of Martin Kabel in the ABC drama Sweet and Sour." Thank you for contacting me. Regards, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
274288 +++$+++ Shaidar cuebiyar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274285 +++$+++ 274287 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.194809040E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Sarah, for your information, I didn't doubt its veracity merely saw a conflict in interpretation. Perhaps the 1984 Logies were ''presented'' in 1985? Thus David won the 1984 Best New Talent Logie but it was awarded to him in the April 26th 1985 ceremony. I can't see how he could have been awarded the Logie on 6th April 1984 ''before'' the role was broadcast. Unless the whole TV Week website is wrong. +++$+++ :::Thanks, Sarah, for your information, I didn't doubt its veracity merely saw a conflict in interpretation. Perhaps the 1984 Logies were ''presented'' in 1985? Thus David won the 1984 Best New Talent Logie but it was awarded to him in the April 26th 1985 ceremony. I can't see how he could have been awarded the Logie on 6th April 1984 ''before'' the role was broadcast. Unless the whole TV Week website is wrong.[[User:Shaidar cuebiyar|Shaidar cuebiyar]] 11:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
274289 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274285 +++$+++ 274288 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.194810900E09 +++$+++ No problems, Shaidar. I think it is entirely ''probable'' that the award was won for work done during the 1984 season but was not presented until 1985. It seems highly improbable that they would present awards for the year based on work done in only the first four months of a year!  Even more improbable when you consider things like the airing date you mentioned, the fact most series are off during the summer, etc. I would be fine with rewording to that effect. Perhaps something like, \"In the April 1985 [[TV Week Logie Awards]], Reyne won the the 1984 Best New Talent Logie for his work in the on-going role of Martin Kabel the [[ABC]] series ''Sweet and Sour''.\" Or something along those lines. What do you think? Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC) P.S. Thank you for initiating discussion rather than immediately reverting! It was very refreshing and very appreciated! Also, for what it's worth, the article (I think the last version before the 9am show was your last version) was in pretty good shape. As I recall, the only real concerns raised by David were the Logie date and the misspelling of his wife's name.  +++$+++ ::::No problems, Shaidar. I think it is entirely ''probable'' that the award was won for work done during the 1984 season but was not presented until 1985. It seems highly improbable that they would present awards for the year based on work done in only the first four months of a year!  Even more improbable when you consider things like the airing date you mentioned, the fact most series are off during the summer, etc. I would be fine with rewording to that effect. Perhaps something like, "In the April 1985 [[TV Week Logie Awards]], Reyne won the the 1984 Best New Talent Logie for his work in the on-going role of Martin Kabel the [[ABC]] series ''Sweet and Sour''." Or something along those lines. What do you think? Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC) P.S. Thank you for initiating discussion rather than immediately reverting! It was very refreshing and very appreciated! Also, for what it's worth, the article (I think the last version before the 9am show was your last version) was in pretty good shape. As I recall, the only real concerns raised by David were the Logie date and the misspelling of his wife's name. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
274290 +++$+++ Shaidar cuebiyar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274285 +++$+++ 274289 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.194951360E09 +++$+++ Your proposal is great. Thanks for all your effort on [[David Reyne]]. Sorry I've taken so long to reply. +++$+++ :::::Your proposal is great. Thanks for all your effort on [[David Reyne]]. Sorry I've taken so long to reply.[[User:Shaidar cuebiyar|Shaidar cuebiyar]] 02:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
274291 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274285 +++$+++ 274290 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.195248000E09 +++$+++ I have added in the sentence we discussed and I also tried to tweak the language in the section a little. Feel free to go ahead and change it further as you wish. Thanks for raising your concerns with me, I think the article is better for our collaboration. :) You've been great, and please don't hesitate to contact me again if you have any other concerns or would like assistance with anything else. All the best, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC) P.S. If you're Australian, you should consider joining us at the [[WP:AUS|Australian Wikiproject]], or the [[WP:AUSMUSIC|Australian Music wikiproject]].  +++$+++ ::::::I have added in the sentence we discussed and I also tried to tweak the language in the section a little. Feel free to go ahead and change it further as you wish. Thanks for raising your concerns with me, I think the article is better for our collaboration. :) You've been great, and please don't hesitate to contact me again if you have any other concerns or would like assistance with anything else. All the best, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC) P.S. If you're Australian, you should consider joining us at the [[WP:AUS|Australian Wikiproject]], or the [[WP:AUSMUSIC|Australian Music wikiproject]]. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

536435 +++$+++ QuizQuick +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536435 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-12 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.155378780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your editor review RandyWang! I really appreciate it. :)  +++$+++ Thanks for your editor review RandyWang! I really appreciate it. :) [[User:QuizQuick|<span style="color:yellow;background:#700">&nbsp;<span style="background:#700">Q<span style="background:#250">u<span style="background:#250">i<span style="background:#125">z<span style="background:#125"><b>Q</b></span><b>u</b></span><b>i</b></span><b>c</b></span><b>k</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] 03:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
536436 +++$+++ QuizQuick +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536435 +++$+++ 536435 +++$+++ 2006-08-12 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.155432180E09 +++$+++ So, just for kicks, if I were to run for admin today (I know I probably won't get 75% of the votes), but what do you think my vote count would be like? Thanks. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Editor_review\/QuizQuick]  +++$+++ *So, just for kicks, if I were to run for admin today (I know I probably won't get 75% of the votes), but what do you think my vote count would be like? Thanks. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editor_review/QuizQuick] [[User:QuizQuick|<span style="color:yellow;background:#700">&nbsp;<span style="background:#700">Q<span style="background:#250">u<span style="background:#250">i<span style="background:#125">z<span style="background:#125"><b>Q</b></span><b>u</b></span><b>i</b></span><b>c</b></span><b>k</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] 18:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

597859 +++$+++ Tom harrison +++$+++ Robert McClenon +++$+++ 597859 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-30 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.138662180E09 +++$+++ I think I've done enough to the article myself that I shouldn't act unilaterally, but I'll look into it.  +++$+++ I think I've done enough to the article myself that I shouldn't act unilaterally, but I'll look into it. [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 15:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
597860 +++$+++ Tom harrison +++$+++ Robert McClenon +++$+++ 597859 +++$+++ 597859 +++$+++ 2006-01-30 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.138679040E09 +++$+++ In this case, I think it's best to wait for the arbcom to finish. They seem to be picking up the pace a bit, so maybe it won't be too much longer.  +++$+++ :In this case, I think it's best to wait for the arbcom to finish. They seem to be picking up the pace a bit, so maybe it won't be too much longer. [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 19:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

536437 +++$+++ Bornhj +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536437 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-12 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.155409380E09 +++$+++ Hey Randy, just a quick note to let you know I withdrew [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Bornhj 2|my RfA]] at 13\/11\/10. I appreciate your neutral !vote. Good luck with the rest of your HSC trials :) [[User:Bornhj|<font color=\"#3366CC\">--'''jam'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ Hey Randy, just a quick note to let you know I withdrew [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bornhj 2|my RfA]] at 13/11/10. I appreciate your neutral !vote. Good luck with the rest of your HSC trials :) [[User:Bornhj|<font color="#3366CC">--'''jam'''</font>]][[User:Bornhj/E|<font color="green">'''es'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Bornhj|(talk)]]</sup> 12:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
536438 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536437 +++$+++ 536437 +++$+++ 2006-08-12 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.155410400E09 +++$+++ Hey, I'm sorry your RfA reached the point of [[WP:SNOW]], but I really hope you're able to address peoples' concerns (and hell, mine too) without too much hassle. It's very good to see you so willing to address those comments, though, so I hope your next RfA will reflect that enthusiasm. Good luck! :)  +++$+++ :Hey, I'm sorry your RfA reached the point of [[WP:SNOW]], but I really hope you're able to address peoples' concerns (and hell, mine too) without too much hassle. It's very good to see you so willing to address those comments, though, so I hope your next RfA will reflect that enthusiasm. Good luck! :) [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''chat me up''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''fix me up''']]</sub></span>) 12:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

274294 +++$+++ Qst +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-18 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.195433880E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I, \u2014<font style=\"font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 105%\">[[User:Qst|Qst]]<\/font>, award you, [[User:Sarah|Sarah]], this barnstar for your helping out at [[WP:ACC]] and making sure those newbies get off to a good start at their Wiki-life. Regards, \u2014<font style=\"font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 105%\"> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I, —<font style="font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 105%">[[User:Qst|Qst]]</font>, award you, [[User:Sarah|Sarah]], this barnstar for your helping out at [[WP:ACC]] and making sure those newbies get off to a good start at their Wiki-life. Regards, —<font style="font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 105%">[[User:Qst|Qst]]</font> 16:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
274295 +++$+++ Qst +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274294 +++$+++ 274294 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.195433880E09 +++$+++ Also, what are you doing up at this extremely early hour of the morning? \u2014<font style=\"font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 105%\"> +++$+++ : Also, what are you doing up at this extremely early hour of the morning? —<font style="font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 105%">[[User:Qst|Qst]]</font> 16:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
274296 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274294 +++$+++ 274295 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.195434840E09 +++$+++ Hey, Qst! Thank you very much for the barnstar; I'm going to add it to my \"nice things\" page. :) Yeah, my body clock is a bit screwed up from doing nursing night shifts, but I'm going to head off to bed shortly. Wikipedia is good therapy for insomniacs. :) Thank you for the barnstar, it is very much appreciated. Trust all is well with you. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Hey, Qst! Thank you very much for the barnstar; I'm going to add it to my "nice things" page. :) Yeah, my body clock is a bit screwed up from doing nursing night shifts, but I'm going to head off to bed shortly. Wikipedia is good therapy for insomniacs. :) Thank you for the barnstar, it is very much appreciated. Trust all is well with you. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 17:14, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
274297 +++$+++ Qst +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274294 +++$+++ 274296 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.195436460E09 +++$+++ Yeah, all is fine :) Hope you're doing well, too. Regards, \u2014<font style=\"font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 105%\"> +++$+++ :::Yeah, all is fine :) Hope you're doing well, too. Regards, —<font style="font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 105%">[[User:Qst|Qst]]</font> 17:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

536440 +++$+++ Liptonicetea +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536440 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-13 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.155462480E09 +++$+++ This was not an experiment, it is a genuine sex act, well practiced here in the United Kingdom, to be honest i am rather surprised there is not an article about it already.  +++$+++ This was not an experiment, it is a genuine sex act, well practiced here in the United Kingdom, to be honest i am rather surprised there is not an article about it already. [[User:Liptonicetea|Liptonicetea]] 02:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
536441 +++$+++ Liptonicetea +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536440 +++$+++ 536440 +++$+++ 2006-08-13 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.155463080E09 +++$+++ Can I send you a video? Or possibly some stills?  +++$+++ * Can I send you a video? Or possibly some stills? [[User:Liptonicetea|Liptonicetea]] 02:58, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

274298 +++$+++ JKW111 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274298 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-18 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.195437720E09 +++$+++ Sad. I was relying on fair use, but now realise WP guidelines are in fact more limiting that ordinary legal use of copyright - but I do understand why that is the case, so I'll remain sad. But why is Hawks userbox so boring? Is it allowed to at least have a stripe??  +++$+++ Sad. I was relying on fair use, but now realise WP guidelines are in fact more limiting that ordinary legal use of copyright - but I do understand why that is the case, so I'll remain sad. But why is Hawks userbox so boring? Is it allowed to at least have a stripe?? [[User:JKW111|JKW111]] ([[User talk:JKW111|talk]]) 18:02, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
274299 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274298 +++$+++ 274298 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.195437900E09 +++$+++ Indeed, it is very sad. Sure, I can't see why you can't add a strip if you wish. :) The only problem is with fair use images. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Indeed, it is very sad. Sure, I can't see why you can't add a strip if you wish. :) The only problem is with fair use images. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 18:05, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

274301 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-20 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.195601040E09 +++$+++ The disruptions from that IP continue.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:WJBscribe&oldid=172698387#I_need_some_assistance.2C_please.][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&oldid=172712413#Page_semi-protected_again]    I hope you've reported everything you know to Arbcom by email so that they can deal with it.  Thank you.  -  +++$+++ The disruptions from that IP continue.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WJBscribe&oldid=172698387#I_need_some_assistance.2C_please.][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=172712413#Page_semi-protected_again]    I hope you've reported everything you know to Arbcom by email so that they can deal with it.  Thank you.  - [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]]  <sup>[[User_talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 15:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
274302 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274301 +++$+++ 274301 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.195601280E09 +++$+++ Jonathan, please leave me alone. I have blocked you on Gtalk and am filtering your emails for a reason. Thank you,  +++$+++ :Jonathan, please leave me alone. I have blocked you on Gtalk and am filtering your emails for a reason. Thank you, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 15:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

274303 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-22 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.195787940E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FKathryn_NicDh%C3%A0na&diff=173069528&oldid=173058846 This] made me smile. Thank you. :)  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FKathryn_NicDh%C3%A0na&diff=173069528&oldid=173058846 This] made me smile. Thank you. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
274304 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274303 +++$+++ 274303 +++$+++ 2007-11-22 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.195788780E09 +++$+++ I'm glad it gave you smile. :) The calamari man has been doing a fine job. In fact, (I hope Ryan won't mind me giving away a few secrets here) we were talking about you on MSN messenger recently and how well you are doing and how far you have come from that fellow who was freaked out about that blog! I'm so pleased to see how well you're doing, as an admin, helping other users, and even doing interviews and so on. Great work, Acalamari. :)  +++$+++ :I'm glad it gave you smile. :) The calamari man has been doing a fine job. In fact, (I hope Ryan won't mind me giving away a few secrets here) we were talking about you on MSN messenger recently and how well you are doing and how far you have come from that fellow who was freaked out about that blog! I'm so pleased to see how well you're doing, as an admin, helping other users, and even doing interviews and so on. Great work, Acalamari. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 19:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
274305 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274303 +++$+++ 274304 +++$+++ 2007-11-22 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.195789680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the kind words. :) Yes, getting upset over the blog issue and making hasty reports to RFCN were not exactly my best moments here (how long ago were they now, ten months?), but in the end, I used them as a chance to learn. Some goes with my first RfA; it was a rough week, but because of it, I became a better Wikipedian, and a better person overall (I hope I'm not boasting by saying those, they're not meant that way! :) ). To think I was also 15 when I joined here back in October 2006; I'll be 17 later this month. Believe it or not, when I first registered, I thought I was just going to make a few edits here and there for a couple of months, and then disappear. I'm glad that turned out not to be the case. :)  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the kind words. :) Yes, getting upset over the blog issue and making hasty reports to RFCN were not exactly my best moments here (how long ago were they now, ten months?), but in the end, I used them as a chance to learn. Some goes with my first RfA; it was a rough week, but because of it, I became a better Wikipedian, and a better person overall (I hope I'm not boasting by saying those, they're not meant that way! :) ). To think I was also 15 when I joined here back in October 2006; I'll be 17 later this month. Believe it or not, when I first registered, I thought I was just going to make a few edits here and there for a couple of months, and then disappear. I'm glad that turned out not to be the case. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
274306 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274303 +++$+++ 274305 +++$+++ 2007-11-22 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.195794420E09 +++$+++ I think that's the important thing -- using all those things as learning experiences. It's encouraging to other people at a similar level to where you were back then, to give it time, to learn, to grow and to find their way and if they keep at it and learn from their mistakes and not be too shy to ask others for help, then they, too, can become respected editors and even administrators one day. Ten months isn't that long really. If someone had told me back then during the blog and the username controversies that you would be an administrator, and an excellent one at that, by the end of the year, I wouldn't have believed them! But you did it and you're still young and have plenty of time to take over running the joint!:)  +++$+++ :::I think that's the important thing -- using all those things as learning experiences. It's encouraging to other people at a similar level to where you were back then, to give it time, to learn, to grow and to find their way and if they keep at it and learn from their mistakes and not be too shy to ask others for help, then they, too, can become respected editors and even administrators one day. Ten months isn't that long really. If someone had told me back then during the blog and the username controversies that you would be an administrator, and an excellent one at that, by the end of the year, I wouldn't have believed them! But you did it and you're still young and have plenty of time to take over running the joint!:) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 21:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
274307 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274303 +++$+++ 274306 +++$+++ 2007-11-23 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.195820700E09 +++$+++ Heh, and if someone had said back then that my RfA would make it to [[WP:100]], I might have found that funny. :) At any rate, I'm glad I got over those old problems, and I thank you for your continued support. Thank you Sarah, and best wishes. :)  +++$+++ ::::Heh, and if someone had said back then that my RfA would make it to [[WP:100]], I might have found that funny. :) At any rate, I'm glad I got over those old problems, and I thank you for your continued support. Thank you Sarah, and best wishes. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 04:25, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

274308 +++$+++ Random832 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-04 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.196773500E09 +++$+++ Welcome back from your wikibreak. Your last five blocks have been brought up on ANI - I'm not going to comment much, except to say - are you aware that you just blocked at least 322,580 individual IP addresses? \u2014 +++$+++ Welcome back from your wikibreak. Your last five blocks have been brought up on ANI - I'm not going to comment much, except to say - are you aware that you just blocked at least 322,580 individual IP addresses? —[[User talk:Random832|Random832]] 05:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
274309 +++$+++ Golbez +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274308 +++$+++ 274308 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.196773860E09 +++$+++ And I want to make it clear that ''I was not faulting you for the blocks''; that's why I didn't come to you first, because I saw it was a list and policy laid down a year ago that you were acting on. I figured you blocked for a reason, and I wasn't disputing the reason; only the guidelines in the policy. -- +++$+++ :And I want to make it clear that ''I was not faulting you for the blocks''; that's why I didn't come to you first, because I saw it was a list and policy laid down a year ago that you were acting on. I figured you blocked for a reason, and I wasn't disputing the reason; only the guidelines in the policy. --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 05:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
274310 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274308 +++$+++ 274309 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.196774340E09 +++$+++ No problems, that's okay. I was just using the ranges that the checkuser gave us last time. I just unblocked them for now. Unfortunately, he has been active recently (he follows my edits and seems to reappear whenever I go on a break) and has just recently been the IP on AN talking about private checkuser etc.  +++$+++ ::No problems, that's okay. I was just using the ranges that the checkuser gave us last time. I just unblocked them for now. Unfortunately, he has been active recently (he follows my edits and seems to reappear whenever I go on a break) and has just recently been the IP on AN talking about private checkuser etc. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
274311 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274308 +++$+++ 274310 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.196775300E09 +++$+++ That's him all right. If we see him back again, I personally won't hesitate to reinstate the blocks. As the checkuser said, \"the collateral is truly minimal given how effective they [the rangeblocks] are\". ''' +++$+++ :::That's him all right. If we see him back again, I personally won't hesitate to reinstate the blocks. As the checkuser said, "the collateral is truly minimal given how effective they [the rangeblocks] are". '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 05:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
274312 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274308 +++$+++ 274311 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.196775360E09 +++$+++ Thanks Daniel. Much appreciate the second opinion. :)  +++$+++ ::::Thanks Daniel. Much appreciate the second opinion. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
274313 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274308 +++$+++ 274311 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.196841060E09 +++$+++ Daniel, I think we should reconsider filing that abuse report we wrote with his ISP. He obviously has no intention of honoring his promise to stay away and I don't see why others should be inconvenienced because of his games.  +++$+++ ::::Daniel, I think we should reconsider filing that abuse report we wrote with his ISP. He obviously has no intention of honoring his promise to stay away and I don't see why others should be inconvenienced because of his games. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 23:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
274314 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274308 +++$+++ 274313 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.196938380E09 +++$+++ If he comes back once again I will (I still have it saved on my computer). If he stays away this time, there'll be no need. In effect, this is the final warning. ''' +++$+++ :::::If he comes back once again I will (I still have it saved on my computer). If he stays away this time, there'll be no need. In effect, this is the final warning. '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 02:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

536453 +++$+++ Captainktainer +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536453 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-16 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.155763500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking the time to go through the external links in [[Doom 3]]. I've readded several of the links, as I think they're particularly useful. The Doom cheat codes were fairly famous in previous iterations, and I think it would be a nice bit of a parallel to show the codes for this iteration. PlanetDoom I readded because it seems to be a fairly respected and ''very'' popular Doom portal, and apparently has been around for a very long time. I readded doomwadstation as it seems to be a fairly popular source for such things; I'm not entirely sure about keeping it in the external links, but I felt it best to keep it when in doubt. Do you have any thoughts on this?  +++$+++ Thanks for taking the time to go through the external links in [[Doom 3]]. I've readded several of the links, as I think they're particularly useful. The Doom cheat codes were fairly famous in previous iterations, and I think it would be a nice bit of a parallel to show the codes for this iteration. PlanetDoom I readded because it seems to be a fairly respected and ''very'' popular Doom portal, and apparently has been around for a very long time. I readded doomwadstation as it seems to be a fairly popular source for such things; I'm not entirely sure about keeping it in the external links, but I felt it best to keep it when in doubt. Do you have any thoughts on this? [[User:Captainktainer|Captainktainer]] * [[User talk:Captainktainer|Talk]] 14:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
536454 +++$+++ Captainktainer +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536453 +++$+++ 536453 +++$+++ 2006-08-16 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.155788880E09 +++$+++ I'll gladly keep an eye out on the article. My goal is, over the next month, to get it rated as being at least a B-grade article; eventually it would be nice to have it selected as a Good Article. I'm still thinking about doomwadstation, and if a better link comes along I'll scrap it in favor of the new one.  +++$+++ :I'll gladly keep an eye out on the article. My goal is, over the next month, to get it rated as being at least a B-grade article; eventually it would be nice to have it selected as a Good Article. I'm still thinking about doomwadstation, and if a better link comes along I'll scrap it in favor of the new one. [[User:Captainktainer|Captainktainer]] * [[User talk:Captainktainer|Talk]] 21:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

536456 +++$+++ Shreshth91 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536456 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-17 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.155857400E09 +++$+++ If you'd like to participate in the contest again, check by the [[WP:ESP\/U|contest page]] in a few days and sign up. See you around. <span class=\"user-sig user-Shreshth91\">May the Force be with you!  [[User:Shreshth91|Shr]][[User:Shreshth91\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ If you'd like to participate in the contest again, check by the [[WP:ESP/U|contest page]] in a few days and sign up. See you around. <span class="user-sig user-Shreshth91">May the Force be with you!  [[User:Shreshth91|Shr]][[User:Shreshth91/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Shreshth91|shth91]][[User talk:Shreshth91|<small><font color="green">($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|)</font></small>]]</span> 16:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
536457 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536456 +++$+++ 536456 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.155934020E09 +++$+++ I will second MONGO on this: I see little, if anything, constructive coming out of your votes, and your repeated opposition to new candidates without proper explanation leads me to believe that you're deliberately disrupting the RfA process. Please stop. Consider explaining your votes ''in detail'', providing links to the URLs to specific diffs that you believe illustrate your point, and suggesting briefly how the candidate needs to improve.  +++$+++ :I will second MONGO on this: I see little, if anything, constructive coming out of your votes, and your repeated opposition to new candidates without proper explanation leads me to believe that you're deliberately disrupting the RfA process. Please stop. Consider explaining your votes ''in detail'', providing links to the URLs to specific diffs that you believe illustrate your point, and suggesting briefly how the candidate needs to improve. [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''chat me up''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''fix me up''']]</sub></span>) 13:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

274315 +++$+++ Twenty Years +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.196984340E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Education_in_Australia&diff=176157941&oldid=176140064 ] welcome, if you need help with anything related to EiA, feel free to contact me at any time. Nice to have another one on board :)  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Education_in_Australia&diff=176157941&oldid=176140064 ] welcome, if you need help with anything related to EiA, feel free to contact me at any time. Nice to have another one on board :) [[User:Twenty Years|Twenty]] [[User talk:Twenty Years|Years]] 15:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
274316 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274315 +++$+++ 274315 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.196985540E09 +++$+++ Thank you kindly for the welcome, Twenty Years. Much appreciated. I shall do what I can to help the project and if there are any adminy jobs you need help with, feel free to drop by and let me know and I shall do what I can to help. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thank you kindly for the welcome, Twenty Years. Much appreciated. I shall do what I can to help the project and if there are any adminy jobs you need help with, feel free to drop by and let me know and I shall do what I can to help. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 15:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

274317 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274317 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.196985240E09 +++$+++ Unless someone comes up with a reason for me to get involved, I'm going to sit back and watch the show. I just felt the urge to say \"I told them so\" somewhere. I just hope that he actually gets desysopped this time. I was saddened to see Jehochman publicly state that he was accepting mentorship from Phsychim62. If you know Jehochman, you might want to discuss the wisdom of that decision with him. +++$+++ Unless someone comes up with a reason for me to get involved, I'm going to sit back and watch the show. I just felt the urge to say "I told them so" somewhere. I just hope that he actually gets desysopped this time. I was saddened to see Jehochman publicly state that he was accepting mentorship from Phsychim62. If you know Jehochman, you might want to discuss the wisdom of that decision with him.[[User:Kww|Kww]] ([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 15:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
274318 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274317 +++$+++ 274317 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.196986680E09 +++$+++ <nowiki>*Sigh*<\/nowiki> I know. It's very regretful but predictable that we are back at this position once again and sadly, I also hope that arbcom takes more decisive action this time. I think we're fortunate that he did this to an out-spoken administrator because his behaviour and actions would be enough to scare off most unestablished editors. I am currently away from home and have rather sketchy internet access, but when I get back home I will have a chat with JH (and yes, I do understand your concerns completely).  +++$+++ :<nowiki>*Sigh*</nowiki> I know. It's very regretful but predictable that we are back at this position once again and sadly, I also hope that arbcom takes more decisive action this time. I think we're fortunate that he did this to an out-spoken administrator because his behaviour and actions would be enough to scare off most unestablished editors. I am currently away from home and have rather sketchy internet access, but when I get back home I will have a chat with JH (and yes, I do understand your concerns completely). [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 16:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

526317 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526317 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-06 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.160183880E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] 18:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
526318 +++$+++ Skb8721 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526317 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-09 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.160432940E09 +++$+++ Hi again, I just added the photo of Lew Walt at Quantico, ca. 1945.  I didn't list his rank in the photo caption, because I'm confused as to whether or not he was a Major or a Lt. Colonel at the time.  Is the only difference in the lapel and garrison hat insignia the color of the oak leaf (gold for majors, silver for lt. colonel)?  It's a B&W photo anyway, but I'm just curious about this matter.  Perhaps you could add the correct rank to the Quantico photo?  By the way, I spoke with a relative of General Walt who told me Walt was buried in Quantico National Cemetery, not Arlington; so I changed this information in the article, and included a citation linked to the V.A. grave site web page, which does indeed show him as buried in Quantico.  -- +++$+++ ::Hi again, I just added the photo of Lew Walt at Quantico, ca. 1945.  I didn't list his rank in the photo caption, because I'm confused as to whether or not he was a Major or a Lt. Colonel at the time.  Is the only difference in the lapel and garrison hat insignia the color of the oak leaf (gold for majors, silver for lt. colonel)?  It's a B&W photo anyway, but I'm just curious about this matter.  Perhaps you could add the correct rank to the Quantico photo?  By the way, I spoke with a relative of General Walt who told me Walt was buried in Quantico National Cemetery, not Arlington; so I changed this information in the article, and included a citation linked to the V.A. grave site web page, which does indeed show him as buried in Quantico.  --[[User:Skb8721|Skb8721]] 15:29, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

12177 +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ CorkMan +++$+++ 12177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-25 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.309056240E09 +++$+++ Hi can you please have a look at [[:Category:Hurling_biography_stubs]] and use the new stubs templates that have been created. Also I think its extremely unfair and board line [[WP:CIVIL|uncivil]] to create pages and then expected [[User:Teester]] to tag them for you. It is a very simple task, just add {{tl|GaelicGamesProject}} to the talk page  +++$+++ Hi can you please have a look at [[:Category:Hurling_biography_stubs]] and use the new stubs templates that have been created. Also I think its extremely unfair and board line [[WP:CIVIL|uncivil]] to create pages and then expected [[User:Teester]] to tag them for you. It is a very simple task, just add {{tl|GaelicGamesProject}} to the talk page [[User:Gnevin|Gnevin]] ([[User talk:Gnevin|talk]]) 19:44, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
12178 +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ CorkMan +++$+++ 12177 +++$+++ 12177 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.309056360E09 +++$+++ In fact this is the 3rd time I've asked you to do this. If you continue to ignore this request I may take further action  +++$+++ :In fact this is the 3rd time I've asked you to do this. If you continue to ignore this request I may take further action [[User:Gnevin|Gnevin]] ([[User talk:Gnevin|talk]]) 19:46, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

536466 +++$+++ Firsfron +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536466 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-21 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.156150380E09 +++$+++ On Kpjas' RFA, you have voted '''neutral''' based on his apparent lack of experience, (\"I'm torn on this one, with your excellent long-term service on one hand but apparently limited contributions in important areas on the other. Sorry\"). In fact, Kpjas is ''already'' an admin on the Polish Wikipedia, and has [http:\/\/tools.wikimedia.de\/~interiot\/cgi-bin\/count_edits?user=Kpjas&dbname=plwiki_p 37,000 edits there], including 2,600 to WP space over there. You have voted neutral based on inexperience, but these facts clearly indicate plenty of experience in the required areas. Randy, you want an experienced editor for admin. Kpjas is clearly experienced. Without badgering you, I urge you to reconsider your vote in this particular RfA. Happy editing! :)--<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ On Kpjas' RFA, you have voted '''neutral''' based on his apparent lack of experience, ("I'm torn on this one, with your excellent long-term service on one hand but apparently limited contributions in important areas on the other. Sorry"). In fact, Kpjas is ''already'' an admin on the Polish Wikipedia, and has [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=Kpjas&dbname=plwiki_p 37,000 edits there], including 2,600 to WP space over there. You have voted neutral based on inexperience, but these facts clearly indicate plenty of experience in the required areas. Randy, you want an experienced editor for admin. Kpjas is clearly experienced. Without badgering you, I urge you to reconsider your vote in this particular RfA. Happy editing! :)--<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Firsfron|Firsfron of Ronchester]]</font> 01:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
536467 +++$+++ Firsfron +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536466 +++$+++ 536466 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.156179840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your note on Kpjas' RfA page. Whatever you decide, I appreciate that you will take a moment to review the facts in this RFA. Best wishes and good luck with your school debate! :) <font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for your note on Kpjas' RfA page. Whatever you decide, I appreciate that you will take a moment to review the facts in this RFA. Best wishes and good luck with your school debate! :) <font color="#0000FF">[[User:Firsfron|Firsfron of Ronchester]]</font> 10:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
536468 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536466 +++$+++ 536467 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.156180080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note, I'd never have noticed that he was an admin elsewhere if you hadn't pointed it out. I'll vote in a tick (I just got home), when I've made some tea. Unfortunately, it wasn't my debate, but one of a team of Year 7s that I happen to coach. Fortunately, they won (obviously because of my hard work ;) ). Woo.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the note, I'd never have noticed that he was an admin elsewhere if you hadn't pointed it out. I'll vote in a tick (I just got home), when I've made some tea. Unfortunately, it wasn't my debate, but one of a team of Year 7s that I happen to coach. Fortunately, they won (obviously because of my hard work ;) ). Woo. [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''patch''']]</sub></span>) 10:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
536469 +++$+++ Firsfron +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536466 +++$+++ 536468 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.156181820E09 +++$+++ I saw your change of vote on the RfA. Thanks for taking the time to reconsider your vote. Happy tea. :) Best, <font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ :::I saw your change of vote on the RfA. Thanks for taking the time to reconsider your vote. Happy tea. :) Best, <font color="#0000FF">[[User:Firsfron|Firsfron of Ronchester]]</font> 10:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
536470 +++$+++ Firsfron +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536466 +++$+++ 536469 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.156183080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for being awesome yourself. Not ''everyone'' will reconsider an RfA vote, as if RfA opinions are something set in stone, and can never be changed. Thanks for your flexibility. --<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ ::::Thanks for being awesome yourself. Not ''everyone'' will reconsider an RfA vote, as if RfA opinions are something set in stone, and can never be changed. Thanks for your flexibility. --<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Firsfron|Firsfron of Ronchester]]</font> 10:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

274324 +++$+++ Cbrown1023 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-08 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.197175620E09 +++$+++ On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ''' +++$+++ On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:green">Cbrown1023</span>]]''' '''<small>[[User talk:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:#002bb8">talk</span>]]</small>''' 20:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
274325 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274324 +++$+++ 274324 +++$+++ 2007-12-08 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.197177780E09 +++$+++ Thank you, my friend who pretends to be a bot.:) It  is nice to hear from you, bot-friend!  +++$+++ :Thank you, my friend who pretends to be a bot.:) It  is nice to hear from you, bot-friend! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 21:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
274326 +++$+++ Cbrown1023 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274324 +++$+++ 274325 +++$+++ 2007-12-08 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.197179700E09 +++$+++ Nice to see you around again too! :-) ''' +++$+++ ::Nice to see you around again too! :-) '''[[User:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:green">Cbrown1023</span>]]''' '''<small>[[User talk:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:#002bb8">talk</span>]]</small>''' 21:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

12181 +++$+++ Loosmark +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-16 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.268783880E09 +++$+++ As for Himka well I don't have a particular problem with his statement that Anti-Semitims was not the core of Ukrainian nationalism however since that is included then it is intellectually honest that some of the things that Hedviberit presented on the talk page is included as well.  +++$+++ As for Himka well I don't have a particular problem with his statement that Anti-Semitims was not the core of Ukrainian nationalism however since that is included then it is intellectually honest that some of the things that Hedviberit presented on the talk page is included as well. [[User:Loosmark|<span style="background:#acf;padding:2px;color:black; 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em">&nbsp;'''Dr. Loosmark'''&nbsp;</span>]] 16:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
12182 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12181 +++$+++ 12181 +++$+++ 2010-03-17 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.268818200E09 +++$+++ Stuff like the other stuff is mentioned. The full info belongs in the OUN article. +++$+++ :Stuff like the other stuff is mentioned. The full info belongs in the OUN article.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 02:30, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
12183 +++$+++ Galassi +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12181 +++$+++ 12182 +++$+++ 2010-08-29 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.283135940E09 +++$+++ I don't know if you are active on ukr-wiki, but look at http:\/\/uk.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%86%D1%96%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B0:Contributions\/Nikkolo , if you want\/could do some good there. There is not enough editors and admins to deal with the problem. At least one admin is proHDenial. -- +++$+++ :: I don't know if you are active on ukr-wiki, but look at http://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%86%D1%96%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B0:Contributions/Nikkolo , if you want/could do some good there. There is not enough editors and admins to deal with the problem. At least one admin is proHDenial. --[[User:Galassi|Galassi]] ([[User talk:Galassi|talk]]) 19:39, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

274327 +++$+++ TML +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274327 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-08 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.197186480E09 +++$+++ [[User talk:70.48.153.4]] - is this a malformed unblock request?  +++$+++ [[User talk:70.48.153.4]] - is this a malformed unblock request? [[User:TML|TML]] ([[User talk:TML|talk]]) 23:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
274328 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274327 +++$+++ 274327 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.197190920E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for the heads up, TML. Yes, it would look like an unblock request. Unfortunately, Bell Sympatico uses dynamic IPs that seem to change fairly regularly and so I hope he is able to find his way back to that particular talk page. Thanks again for your note. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thank you very much for the heads up, TML. Yes, it would look like an unblock request. Unfortunately, Bell Sympatico uses dynamic IPs that seem to change fairly regularly and so I hope he is able to find his way back to that particular talk page. Thanks again for your note. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

12184 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-06 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.275840240E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 09:04, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
12185 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12184 +++$+++ 12184 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.276424760E09 +++$+++ It's no bother, but I have no opinion.  Sorry I couldn't help! +++$+++ :It's no bother, but I have no opinion.  Sorry I couldn't help![[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 03:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

536473 +++$+++ PseudoSudo +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-23 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.156398960E09 +++$+++ Hey; regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship\/RandyWang&diff=prev&oldid=71469772], just letting you know for accuracy that you dropped the reference from your user page a couple of days ago in your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:RandyWang\/aboutme&diff=70327481&oldid=68990361 rewrite]. Just a slip. ~  +++$+++ Hey; regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/RandyWang&diff=prev&oldid=71469772], just letting you know for accuracy that you dropped the reference from your user page a couple of days ago in your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:RandyWang/aboutme&diff=70327481&oldid=68990361 rewrite]. Just a slip. ~ [[User:PseudoSudo|PseudoSudo]] 22:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
536474 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536473 +++$+++ 536473 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.156403220E09 +++$+++ Ah, damn. Thanks for this, I've noted it at the RfA. :)  +++$+++ :Ah, damn. Thanks for this, I've noted it at the RfA. :) [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''patch''']]</sub></span>) 00:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
536475 +++$+++ Golbez +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536473 +++$+++ 536473 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.156549320E09 +++$+++ So it IS one of the guys you teach at school? Or just happened to call him? :P Anyway, okay. But since they are so incredibly similar, I'm keeping him on the same short leash. Maybe not needed, since he hasn't edited since. -- +++$+++ :So it IS one of the guys you teach at school? Or just happened to call him? :P Anyway, okay. But since they are so incredibly similar, I'm keeping him on the same short leash. Maybe not needed, since he hasn't edited since. --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 16:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

12186 +++$+++ Renata3 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-12 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.276386840E09 +++$+++ Re [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=House_of_Mindaugas&diff=next&oldid=332914324 this addition]. I cannot verify that the book even exists. I can't find ISBN, etc. I would seem that it would not be a [[WP:RS|reliable]] or [[WP:V|verifiable]] source. Even if the book turned out to be legit, I am extremely skeptical about the claim. Medieval noble families tried to improve their ancestry by creating imaginative genealogical links between them and some famous ruler. I would be very careful, without support in other sources. Thus I removed the claim.  +++$+++ Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=House_of_Mindaugas&diff=next&oldid=332914324 this addition]. I cannot verify that the book even exists. I can't find ISBN, etc. I would seem that it would not be a [[WP:RS|reliable]] or [[WP:V|verifiable]] source. Even if the book turned out to be legit, I am extremely skeptical about the claim. Medieval noble families tried to improve their ancestry by creating imaginative genealogical links between them and some famous ruler. I would be very careful, without support in other sources. Thus I removed the claim. [[User:Renata3|Renata]] ([[User talk:Renata3|talk]]) 16:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
12187 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12186 +++$+++ 12186 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.276419720E09 +++$+++ You are correct, and the info is listed as a claim, not The Truth (I'll reword it).  It doesn't seem too controversial, as it is corroborated by another (some 17th century Polish chronicler) source describing Huyd's wife as a \"close relative\" of Shvarn. +++$+++ :You are correct, and the info is listed as a claim, not The Truth (I'll reword it).  It doesn't seem too controversial, as it is corroborated by another (some 17th century Polish chronicler) source describing Huyd's wife as a "close relative" of Shvarn.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 02:02, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
12188 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12186 +++$+++ 12187 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.276420260E09 +++$+++ There is a photo of the book [http:\/\/forum.vgd.ru\/20\/17118\/90.htm here] (scroll down). More is [http:\/\/centrevr.com.ua\/uk\/book\/detail\/4\/76 here]. If the claim was particularly contentious I would agree, but there is that other referenced bit of info... +++$+++ ::There is a photo of the book [http://forum.vgd.ru/20/17118/90.htm here] (scroll down). More is [http://centrevr.com.ua/uk/book/detail/4/76 here]. If the claim was particularly contentious I would agree, but there is that other referenced bit of info...[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 02:11, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
12189 +++$+++ Renata3 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12186 +++$+++ 12188 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.276427820E09 +++$+++ Also, please be careful with reverts. You reverted a ton of good changes while trying to re-introduce the material.  +++$+++ :::Also, please be careful with reverts. You reverted a ton of good changes while trying to re-introduce the material. [[User:Renata3|Renata]] ([[User talk:Renata3|talk]]) 04:17, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
12190 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12186 +++$+++ 12189 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.276460340E09 +++$+++ The author has other books about that family that do have ISBN numbers, see [http:\/\/www.lvivcenter.org\/ru\/library\/book?bookid=376&dest=printer  here].  Here is the [http:\/\/centrevr.com.ua\/uk\/book\/index\/4\/76 publisher's website].  It would be inappropriate to weed out legendary claims, even if by 17th century chroniclers, as they are also notable in and of themselves although they should be labeled as such and it would be inappropriate to include them as if they are indesutable facts. Rather than simply unilaterally remove info isn't it better to go through a process? I am moving this conversation to the article's talk page. +++$+++ ::::The author has other books about that family that do have ISBN numbers, see [http://www.lvivcenter.org/ru/library/book?bookid=376&dest=printer  here].  Here is the [http://centrevr.com.ua/uk/book/index/4/76 publisher's website].  It would be inappropriate to weed out legendary claims, even if by 17th century chroniclers, as they are also notable in and of themselves although they should be labeled as such and it would be inappropriate to include them as if they are indesutable facts. Rather than simply unilaterally remove info isn't it better to go through a process? I am moving this conversation to the article's talk page.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 13:19, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

274332 +++$+++ Whiteandnerdy111 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-14 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.197694500E09 +++$+++ You might want to see [[Talk:Sorrento, Victoria|this new topic I started on the plane crash in Sorrento]]. Being a resident there (according to the WP:AUS members), I'll let you make the call. --  +++$+++ You might want to see [[Talk:Sorrento, Victoria|this new topic I started on the plane crash in Sorrento]]. Being a resident there (according to the WP:AUS members), I'll let you make the call. -- [[User:Whiteandnerdy111|Whiteandnerdy111]] ([[User talk:Whiteandnerdy111|talk]]) 20:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
274333 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274332 +++$+++ 274332 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.197882900E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks for letting me know.  +++$+++ :Okay, thanks for letting me know. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:15, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

12191 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12191 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-15 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.276633920E09 +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. \u2013 +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 13:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
12192 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12191 +++$+++ 12191 +++$+++ 2010-06-15 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.276634940E09 +++$+++ Thanks! +++$+++ :Thanks![[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 13:49, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

12193 +++$+++ Bandurist +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-15 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.276639680E09 +++$+++ \u0427\u0438 \u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0448 \u0431\u0443\u0434\u044c\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0432\u0456\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438 [[Polish Auxiliary Police]]. \u0414\u044f\u043a\u0443\u044e.  +++$+++ Чи зможеш будьласка перевірити [[Polish Auxiliary Police]]. Дякую. [[User:Bandurist|Bandurist]] ([[User talk:Bandurist|talk]]) 15:08, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
12194 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12193 +++$+++ 12193 +++$+++ 2010-06-15 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.276640460E09 +++$+++ It could use some minor clean-up but looks like a good article. +++$+++ :It could use some minor clean-up but looks like a good article.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 15:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

536482 +++$+++ TheM62Manchester +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-28 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.156787100E09 +++$+++ I've added my comment, have a look now! Most of my article writing is adding obscure facts to articles etc... -- +++$+++ I've added my comment, have a look now! Most of my article writing is adding obscure facts to articles etc... --[[User:TheM62Manchester|TheM62Manchester]] 10:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
536483 +++$+++ TheM62Manchester +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536482 +++$+++ 536482 +++$+++ 2006-08-28 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.156787520E09 +++$+++ See the editor review, I've asked a new question! -- +++$+++ :See the editor review, I've asked a new question! --[[User:TheM62Manchester|TheM62Manchester]] 10:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

12195 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12195 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-22 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.285157100E09 +++$+++ how did you get it? --''' +++$+++ how did you get it? --'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 05:05, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
12196 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12195 +++$+++ 12195 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.285183920E09 +++$+++ I googled it and viewed it as a HTML. Here is the link: [http:\/\/webcache.googleusercontent.com\/search?q=cache:9jchoY_we38J:ww2-historicalmemory.org.ua\/docs\/eng\/Rudling.doc+rudling+UPA+OUN&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us]. +++$+++ :I googled it and viewed it as a HTML. Here is the link: [http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:9jchoY_we38J:ww2-historicalmemory.org.ua/docs/eng/Rudling.doc+rudling+UPA+OUN&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us].[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 12:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
12197 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12195 +++$+++ 12196 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.285237140E09 +++$+++ Thanks man--''' +++$+++ ::Thanks man--'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 03:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

536485 +++$+++ Alex9891 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.156884360E09 +++$+++ You should pass easily next time. I actually thought you were an admin, and was quite surprised to see your name on the RFA list! Good luck for next time. --''' +++$+++ You should pass easily next time. I actually thought you were an admin, and was quite surprised to see your name on the RFA list! Good luck for next time. --'''[[User:Alex9891|<span style="color:orange">Alex</span>]]''' ''<sup>[[User talk:Alex9891|<span style="color:green">talk here</span>]]</sup>'' 13:46, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
536486 +++$+++ Guinnog +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536485 +++$+++ 536485 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.156884540E09 +++$+++ Hear hear. I did also wonder about your name; although I've noted your many positive contributions for a while, I did wonder if it was a deliberate double entendre. Anyway, good luck the next time. -- +++$+++ :Hear hear. I did also wonder about your name; although I've noted your many positive contributions for a while, I did wonder if it was a deliberate double entendre. Anyway, good luck the next time. --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 13:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
536487 +++$+++ Bornhj +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536485 +++$+++ 536485 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.156884720E09 +++$+++ Agreed. You'll pass easily next time. It was a bit of a shame that that one specific incident occured right before your RfA, but it's pretty clear you learned from that (well, I hope it's clear - I changed my !vote on it...). I also really disagree with opposing based on the fact that a name ''could'' have an alternate sexual meaning, but each to his own. I'll go watchlist [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/RandyWang 2]] right now (providing you don't change your username before that...). Cheers. [[User:Bornhj|<font color=\"#3366CC\">--'''jam'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Agreed. You'll pass easily next time. It was a bit of a shame that that one specific incident occured right before your RfA, but it's pretty clear you learned from that (well, I hope it's clear - I changed my !vote on it...). I also really disagree with opposing based on the fact that a name ''could'' have an alternate sexual meaning, but each to his own. I'll go watchlist [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RandyWang 2]] right now (providing you don't change your username before that...). Cheers. [[User:Bornhj|<font color="#3366CC">--'''jam'''</font>]][[User:Bornhj/E|<font color="green">'''es'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Bornhj|(talk)]]</sup> 13:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
536488 +++$+++ Mike 7 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536485 +++$+++ 536487 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.156884780E09 +++$+++ Indeed. Good luck next time.  +++$+++ ::Indeed. Good luck next time. [[User:Mike 7|Michael]] 13:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
536489 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536485 +++$+++ 536487 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.156884780E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry you did not make it. I expect to support again next time Cheers,  +++$+++ ::I'm sorry you did not make it. I expect to support again next time Cheers, [[User_talk:Dlohcierekim| :) Dlohcierekim]] 13:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
536490 +++$+++ Srose +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536485 +++$+++ 536487 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.156885260E09 +++$+++ Awww, I'm so sorry your RFA failed. :( I really do think you deserve the extra buttons. I guess the only advice I have is be more careful about tagging speedies - we've all made the mistake but at RFA your record is on prominent display. I think you'll do ''great'' next time, though. The username thing is unfortunate; I'm sure it was unintentional. I doubt it'll be enough to hold you back next time, though. Good luck next time; keep me updated! =)  +++$+++ ::Awww, I'm so sorry your RFA failed. :( I really do think you deserve the extra buttons. I guess the only advice I have is be more careful about tagging speedies - we've all made the mistake but at RFA your record is on prominent display. I think you'll do ''great'' next time, though. The username thing is unfortunate; I'm sure it was unintentional. I doubt it'll be enough to hold you back next time, though. Good luck next time; keep me updated! =) [[User:Srose|<b><font color="green">S<i>rose</i></font></b>]] [[User talk:Srose|<font color="hotpink">(<b>talk</b>)</font>]] 14:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
536491 +++$+++ Meegs +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536485 +++$+++ 536487 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.156885740E09 +++$+++ After seeing your intent to change your name, I was researching your record this morning to decide where to move my position when the discussion closed. As someone there said, you should get the CHU in before some joker decides to register the new name. Keep up the good work, and best of luck in the future. '''''\xd7''''' +++$+++ ::After seeing your intent to change your name, I was researching your record this morning to decide where to move my position when the discussion closed. As someone there said, you should get the CHU in before some joker decides to register the new name. Keep up the good work, and best of luck in the future. '''''×'''''[[User:Meegs|Meegs]] 14:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

12198 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-22 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.285157220E09 +++$+++ Outside of the Holodomor, Poltava (Mezepa et al.), and say the whole UPA\/OUN Nazi stuff, are there any other instances of historical disagreement between the Kremlin  \/ neo-Soviet school and the western or Ukrainian schools? --''' +++$+++ Outside of the Holodomor, Poltava (Mezepa et al.), and say the whole UPA/OUN Nazi stuff, are there any other instances of historical disagreement between the Kremlin  / neo-Soviet school and the western or Ukrainian schools? --'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 05:07, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
12199 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12198 +++$+++ 12198 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.285202040E09 +++$+++ The Pereyaslav treaty come to mind. Russian and Ukrainian myth-makers seem to generally agree on the narrative of Polish persecution against Ukrainians prior to Khmelyntsky's uprising, though. +++$+++ :The Pereyaslav treaty come to mind. Russian and Ukrainian myth-makers seem to generally agree on the narrative of Polish persecution against Ukrainians prior to Khmelyntsky's uprising, though.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 17:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
12200 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12198 +++$+++ 12199 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.285239300E09 +++$+++ Hm, true. I wrote about that once but tied it into Poltava, I guess a research paper could be done on Pereyaslav in of itself as well \/ cossack autonomy and its place in the empire. Just scratching my head trying to find more discrepancies and cant believe I'm stuck on these when there are so many disputes about \"unifying the history books\" and all that. There's got to be more dirt --''' +++$+++ ::Hm, true. I wrote about that once but tied it into Poltava, I guess a research paper could be done on Pereyaslav in of itself as well / cossack autonomy and its place in the empire. Just scratching my head trying to find more discrepancies and cant believe I'm stuck on these when there are so many disputes about "unifying the history books" and all that. There's got to be more dirt --'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 03:55, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

274343 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.199285220E09 +++$+++ <font color=\"darkgray\">Hello Sarah, I hope you had a pleasant New Year's Day, and that 2008 brings further success, health and happiness! ...and further [[WP:AUS|nationalist conquests]] ;) All the best!.... ~ ''' +++$+++ <font color="darkgray">Hello Sarah, I hope you had a pleasant New Year's Day, and that 2008 brings further success, health and happiness! ...and further [[WP:AUS|nationalist conquests]] ;) All the best!.... ~ '''[[User:Blnguyen|<font color="GoldenRod">Blnguyen</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:Blnguyen|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 06:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
274344 +++$+++ Alison +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274343 +++$+++ 274343 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.199371920E09 +++$+++ Happy New Year, Sarah :) -  +++$+++ : Happy New Year, Sarah :) - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">'''A<font color= "#FF7C0A">l<font color= "#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 06:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

12201 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-29 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.285798800E09 +++$+++ How long will this madness go on for?--''' +++$+++ How long will this madness go on for?--'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 15:20, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
12202 +++$+++ Galassi +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12201 +++$+++ 12201 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.286276280E09 +++$+++ More here http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ukrainian_People's_Militia -- +++$+++ : More here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_People's_Militia --[[User:Galassi|Galassi]] ([[User talk:Galassi|talk]]) 03:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
12203 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12201 +++$+++ 12202 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.286328180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 18:23, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
12204 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12201 +++$+++ 12203 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.286347680E09 +++$+++ I'll take a closer look at them but since the sources he uses are not in English, it's hard for me to verify them or fact check. I'll be doing a lot of research over the next several weeks on the OUN\/UPA so I'll gladly look into certain things while doing this, but like I said, it's hard to check joe\/pawel when they refuse to use legit sources.--''' +++$+++ :::I'll take a closer look at them but since the sources he uses are not in English, it's hard for me to verify them or fact check. I'll be doing a lot of research over the next several weeks on the OUN/UPA so I'll gladly look into certain things while doing this, but like I said, it's hard to check joe/pawel when they refuse to use legit sources.--'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 23:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
12205 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12201 +++$+++ 12204 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.286895240E09 +++$+++ He's back: [[Bergbauernhilfe]] --''' +++$+++ ::::He's back: [[Bergbauernhilfe]] --'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 07:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
12206 +++$+++ Galassi +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12201 +++$+++ 12205 +++$+++ 2010-10-29 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.288341060E09 +++$+++ He's been replaced with another character of a similar nature: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Voyevoda , fresh off a 6mos ban.-- +++$+++ ::::: He's been replaced with another character of a similar nature: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Voyevoda , fresh off a 6mos ban.--[[User:Galassi|Galassi]] ([[User talk:Galassi|talk]]) 01:31, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

274350 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-21 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.200942060E09 +++$+++ Great to see your name come up in contrib history over the last few days.  Trust all is well.  Sorry had to leave a comment on behalf of myself (and I suspect a few others) who have been missing you, and was a little concerned with an unanswered email sent recently ;) -- +++$+++ Great to see your name come up in contrib history over the last few days.  Trust all is well.  Sorry had to leave a comment on behalf of myself (and I suspect a few others) who have been missing you, and was a little concerned with an unanswered email sent recently ;) --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 11:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
274351 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274350 +++$+++ 274350 +++$+++ 2008-01-22 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.201051080E09 +++$+++ Thank you my dear old friend, Steve. And thank you for your lovely email (which I have now replied to), it was very much appreciated and I'm sorry I've taken so long to write. I hope all is well with you and yours. :)  +++$+++ :Thank you my dear old friend, Steve. And thank you for your lovely email (which I have now replied to), it was very much appreciated and I'm sorry I've taken so long to write. I hope all is well with you and yours. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 17:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

536495 +++$+++ Ligulem +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.157037000E09 +++$+++ I'm wishing you all the best too and hope you are not saddened or pissed off by your unsuccessful RFA ;-). Going through an RfA is a hard thing these days. Requirements on admins are constantly increasing (admins must \"walk on water\", be ambassadors, whatever - oh noes!). However, the important thing is to be a Wikipedian - adminship is no big deal. Admins are not more valuable or more important than anbody else. They have to act on behalf of consensus. Nothing else. -- +++$+++ I'm wishing you all the best too and hope you are not saddened or pissed off by your unsuccessful RFA ;-). Going through an RfA is a hard thing these days. Requirements on admins are constantly increasing (admins must "walk on water", be ambassadors, whatever - oh noes!). However, the important thing is to be a Wikipedian - adminship is no big deal. Admins are not more valuable or more important than anbody else. They have to act on behalf of consensus. Nothing else. --[[User:Ligulem|Ligulem]] 08:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
536496 +++$+++ The Halo +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536495 +++$+++ 536495 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.156917060E09 +++$+++ Hi Randy, I'm sorry to hear that you're RfA did not pass. Don't be too upset, please, you're a really good editor, and I think that you'll do a lot of good with the tools one day :) All the best, [[User:The Halo|Th]][[User:The Halo\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">\u03b5<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Hi Randy, I'm sorry to hear that you're RfA did not pass. Don't be too upset, please, you're a really good editor, and I think that you'll do a lot of good with the tools one day :) All the best, [[User:The Halo|Th]][[User:The Halo/Esperanza|<font color="green">ε</font>]][[User:The Halo| Halo]] <sup>[[User talk:The Halo|'''Θ''']]</sup> 22:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

12208 +++$+++ J.kunikowski +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12208 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-19 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.287557340E09 +++$+++ My grandfather was among the murdered professors in the Lwow massacre. I strongly advise you against attempting to reinstate that ugly defamation of his memory.  +++$+++ My grandfather was among the murdered professors in the Lwow massacre. I strongly advise you against attempting to reinstate that ugly defamation of his memory. [[User:J.kunikowski|J.kunikowski]] ([[User talk:J.kunikowski|talk]]) 23:49, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
12209 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12208 +++$+++ 12208 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.287570120E09 +++$+++ It is a referenced fact. Perhaps we can word it in a more sensitive way for you? +++$+++ :It is a referenced fact. Perhaps we can word it in a more sensitive way for you?[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 03:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
12210 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12208 +++$+++ 12209 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.287570300E09 +++$+++ I see that it's been reworded somewhat. +++$+++ ::I see that it's been reworded somewhat.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 03:25, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
12211 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12208 +++$+++ 12210 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.287572280E09 +++$+++ I've written a note on the article's talk page, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Massacre_of_Lviv_professors#Cooperation_with_Soviets here],  to hopefully clarify things. +++$+++ :::I've written a note on the article's talk page, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Massacre_of_Lviv_professors#Cooperation_with_Soviets here],  to hopefully clarify things.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 03:58, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
12212 +++$+++ J.kunikowski +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12208 +++$+++ 12211 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.287603720E09 +++$+++ \"A referenced fact\"? Just because somebody claims something it is not a fact. You tried to portray the murdered professors as collaborationist which is appalling. I don't want you to reword those insults, I want you to remove them at once.  +++$+++ :::: "A referenced fact"? Just because somebody claims something it is not a fact. You tried to portray the murdered professors as collaborationist which is appalling. I don't want you to reword those insults, I want you to remove them at once. [[User:J.kunikowski|J.kunikowski]] ([[User talk:J.kunikowski|talk]]) 12:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
12213 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12208 +++$+++ 12212 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.287603780E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your opinion. The discussion is on the article's talk page, if you would like to contribute to it. +++$+++ :::::Thank you for your opinion. The discussion is on the article's talk page, if you would like to contribute to it.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 12:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

536497 +++$+++ Williamborg +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-30 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.156929240E09 +++$+++ Nice message on the Admin results. Hang in there. You have what it takes but are still relatively new. With a few more miles (and some thoughts about the negative votes) you'll make it & be awarded the awesome power to delete things so that they're invisible to us run of the mill peasants and do all the other mysterious things those of us in the trenches don't know about (I hear rumors that the Admins hold wild parties & the like&mdash;why else would people want the job). Cheers mate -  +++$+++ Nice message on the Admin results. Hang in there. You have what it takes but are still relatively new. With a few more miles (and some thoughts about the negative votes) you'll make it & be awarded the awesome power to delete things so that they're invisible to us run of the mill peasants and do all the other mysterious things those of us in the trenches don't know about (I hear rumors that the Admins hold wild parties & the like&mdash;why else would people want the job). Cheers mate - [[User:Williamborg|Williamborg (Bill)]] 02:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
536498 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536497 +++$+++ 536497 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.156946700E09 +++$+++ Wild admin parties eh? *prepares [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Riana_dzasta]]* Bring out the Wikibeer! &mdash; ''' +++$+++ :Wild admin parties eh? *prepares [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Riana_dzasta]]* Bring out the Wikibeer! &mdash; '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana_dzasta]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:Riana_dzasta|wreak havoc]]'''|'''[[Special:Contributions/Riana_dzasta|damage report]] </sub> 07:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
536499 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536497 +++$+++ 536498 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.156962060E09 +++$+++ Damnit!.. my wiki-mum won't let me stay out any later than 22:00 UTC, and certainly won't like the scent of digital booze on my breath. Such oppression. :(  +++$+++ ::Damnit!.. my wiki-mum won't let me stay out any later than 22:00 UTC, and certainly won't like the scent of digital booze on my breath. Such oppression. :( [[User:RandyWang|RandyWang]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:RandyWang|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''patch''']]</sub></span>) 11:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

264179 +++$+++ Angie Y. +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-06 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.183707060E09 +++$+++ I agree with the rewrite, Matt.  +++$+++ I agree with the rewrite, Matt. [[User:Angie Y.|Angie Y.]] 00:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
264180 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.183931340E09 +++$+++ Please don't randomly remove tags without a good reason. Just having sources doesn't automatically assert notability (a few that you have reverted don't even have that much). As you are an admin, you really should know that your opinion doesn't trump [[WP:N]] (which isn't \"just a guideline.\" It directly correlates with [[WP:V]].).  +++$+++ :Please don't randomly remove tags without a good reason. Just having sources doesn't automatically assert notability (a few that you have reverted don't even have that much). As you are an admin, you really should know that your opinion doesn't trump [[WP:N]] (which isn't "just a guideline." It directly correlates with [[WP:V]].). [[User:TTN|TTN]] 14:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264181 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264180 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.183931580E09 +++$+++ Please don't add tags ''en masse''. As an admin, I abide by Wikipedia ''policy''. You do not have consensus. The articles are verifiable (policy). The guidelines says that plot summaries may be relevant when the subject is large.  +++$+++ ::Please don't add tags ''en masse''. As an admin, I abide by Wikipedia ''policy''. You do not have consensus. The articles are verifiable (policy). The guidelines says that plot summaries may be relevant when the subject is large. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264182 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264181 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.183931880E09 +++$+++ A cleanup\/notability tag is a cleanup\/notability tag. Extra functions (which have mostly been removed) or how they were added doesn't change that. You seem to be wikilawyering at this point. I suggest that you take it up at [[WP:N]] instead of asserting that these abide by [[WP:V]]. They don't abide by [[WP:V]] because a main point of it is \"reliable published sources\", which these don't have.  +++$+++ :::A cleanup/notability tag is a cleanup/notability tag. Extra functions (which have mostly been removed) or how they were added doesn't change that. You seem to be wikilawyering at this point. I suggest that you take it up at [[WP:N]] instead of asserting that these abide by [[WP:V]]. They don't abide by [[WP:V]] because a main point of it is "reliable published sources", which these don't have. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 14:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264183 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264181 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.183938840E09 +++$+++ \"Publishing\" on TV is legitimate verifiability for relevant matreial.  +++$+++ :::"Publishing" on TV is legitimate verifiability for relevant matreial. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264184 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264183 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.183939380E09 +++$+++ It is fine for sourcing some stuff, but it is not good enough to verify notability outside of the series that it is in, which is required.  +++$+++ ::::It is fine for sourcing some stuff, but it is not good enough to verify notability outside of the series that it is in, which is required. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 17:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264185 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264184 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.183951020E09 +++$+++ Which brings us to the POV of the whole discussion. Episodes are notable. I know you think they're not, but I do. That is the problem, and we're just going round in circles. [[WP:FICT]] also supports my interpretation. It's a shame that this is causing so much unrest as there are so many more important things on Wikipedia to worry about, such as unreferenced articles about living people.  +++$+++ :::::Which brings us to the POV of the whole discussion. Episodes are notable. I know you think they're not, but I do. That is the problem, and we're just going round in circles. [[WP:FICT]] also supports my interpretation. It's a shame that this is causing so much unrest as there are so many more important things on Wikipedia to worry about, such as unreferenced articles about living people. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264186 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264185 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.183951380E09 +++$+++ No, there is no POV to be had by myself. The view that episodes are not notable until proven so goes along with [[WP:N]] and [[WP:V]]. The same goes with any other topic, so episodes are no different. [[WP:FICT]] requires out of universe info like the rest, so there is no doubt in my mind that you are just misreading it completely (like many other people). Until you can show otherwise, the only people pushing a POV are people that somehow conclude that we can ignore [[WP:N]]. There are more than enough people to cover BLP, while most just ignore the pathetic state of fiction, so I would say it is definitely more important to focus on this at the moment.  +++$+++ ::::::No, there is no POV to be had by myself. The view that episodes are not notable until proven so goes along with [[WP:N]] and [[WP:V]]. The same goes with any other topic, so episodes are no different. [[WP:FICT]] requires out of universe info like the rest, so there is no doubt in my mind that you are just misreading it completely (like many other people). Until you can show otherwise, the only people pushing a POV are people that somehow conclude that we can ignore [[WP:N]]. There are more than enough people to cover BLP, while most just ignore the pathetic state of fiction, so I would say it is definitely more important to focus on this at the moment. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 20:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264187 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264183 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.183952040E09 +++$+++ It's a shame that you're not appreciating that your POV is just that. The guidelines are very good models for good\/featured articles. We do not delete (which is what you are doing considering the end user) just because there are limitations. Your 'assessment' of a wide range of articles as 'pathetic' is a hyperbolic adjective: POV.  +++$+++ ::::It's a shame that you're not appreciating that your POV is just that. The guidelines are very good models for good/featured articles. We do not delete (which is what you are doing considering the end user) just because there are limitations. Your 'assessment' of a wide range of articles as 'pathetic' is a hyperbolic adjective: POV. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264188 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264187 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.183952520E09 +++$+++ That doesn't matter if the articles will never even reach close to that. See, you actually have to show that these can meet even the lowest of standards for your case to even have a shot. Unless we can talk about a topic as its own thing, not solely as a part of another topic, we cannot cover it. That goes for relatives of famous people, single people that died in great catastrophes, locations, characters, and other parts of a series, and, \"surprise, surprise\", episodes of a series. Again, your opinion is nothing more than an opinion, while I can cite guidelines and policies in the very least (though I guess it is with a \"POV\").  +++$+++ :::::That doesn't matter if the articles will never even reach close to that. See, you actually have to show that these can meet even the lowest of standards for your case to even have a shot. Unless we can talk about a topic as its own thing, not solely as a part of another topic, we cannot cover it. That goes for relatives of famous people, single people that died in great catastrophes, locations, characters, and other parts of a series, and, "surprise, surprise", episodes of a series. Again, your opinion is nothing more than an opinion, while I can cite guidelines and policies in the very least (though I guess it is with a "POV"). [[User:TTN|TTN]] 20:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264189 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264187 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.183952940E09 +++$+++ And so you don't think otherwise, I am not against episode articles; only ones that cannot become anything are bad. As long as it can reach a decent standard, it is fine (take a look at some of the Simpsons GAs and obviously the few episode FAs). The problem with that is the obvious lack of real information for most episodes. A plot summary is useless without real information to back it up.  +++$+++ :::::And so you don't think otherwise, I am not against episode articles; only ones that cannot become anything are bad. As long as it can reach a decent standard, it is fine (take a look at some of the Simpsons GAs and obviously the few episode FAs). The problem with that is the obvious lack of real information for most episodes. A plot summary is useless without real information to back it up. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 20:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264190 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264187 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.183953300E09 +++$+++ The guidelines you cite in such a way are vague.  +++$+++ :::::The guidelines you cite in such a way are vague. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264191 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264190 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.183953780E09 +++$+++ Oh come on, \"[[WP:N|A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.]]\", \"[[WP:V|Articles should only contain material that has been published by reliable sources.]]\", \"[[WP:RS|Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable sources.]]\", \"[[WP:NOT#IINFO|Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance; such articles are not solely or overwhelmingly a summary of a work's plot. A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic.]]\", and the rest are hardly vague.  +++$+++ ::::::Oh come on, "[[WP:N|A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.]]", "[[WP:V|Articles should only contain material that has been published by reliable sources.]]", "[[WP:RS|Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable sources.]]", "[[WP:NOT#IINFO|Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance; such articles are not solely or overwhelmingly a summary of a work's plot. A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic.]]", and the rest are hardly vague. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 21:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
264192 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264187 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.184306400E09 +++$+++ There are plenty of things articles should do. Many articles don't yet do them. Articles are developed. That's how the project works.  +++$+++ :::::There are plenty of things articles should do. Many articles don't yet do them. Articles are developed. That's how the project works. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 23:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
264193 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264192 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.184307180E09 +++$+++ When challenged, articles still need to assert a possibility of becoming good and standing on their own. We don't just leave them to rot forever because \"They'll be worked on soon!\" or \"They can become good! All we have to do is wait!\" After that, the articles aren't even edited for months on end. Plus, most have had well over a year to get past the hurdle.  +++$+++ ::::::When challenged, articles still need to assert a possibility of becoming good and standing on their own. We don't just leave them to rot forever because "They'll be worked on soon!" or "They can become good! All we have to do is wait!" After that, the articles aren't even edited for months on end. Plus, most have had well over a year to get past the hurdle. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 23:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
264194 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264187 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.184349840E09 +++$+++ OK, but for consistency, how do you feel about articles tagged as 'cleanup' or 'unreferenced'. (Cleaning those cats actually often flags up a few A7s PRODs or AFDs, to be fair.) Since I became aware of the GA process, I see everything below that as being rather poor anyway.  +++$+++ :::::OK, but for consistency, how do you feel about articles tagged as 'cleanup' or 'unreferenced'. (Cleaning those cats actually often flags up a few A7s PRODs or AFDs, to be fair.) Since I became aware of the GA process, I see everything below that as being rather poor anyway. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
264195 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264179 +++$+++ 264193 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.184350680E09 +++$+++ There are way too many different articles placed in those to actually give an opinion on them. But, basically, it should be all about chances for sources for the unreferenced articles. If all that is needed is a cleanup in format and writing, it's crappy, but it has potential.  +++$+++ :::::::There are way too many different articles placed in those to actually give an opinion on them. But, basically, it should be all about chances for sources for the unreferenced articles. If all that is needed is a cleanup in format and writing, it's crappy, but it has potential. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 11:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

274357 +++$+++ Timeshift9 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-18 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.203366180E09 +++$+++ Can you please ask the user not to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:GaryGazza refer to me] on his userpage?  +++$+++ Can you please ask the user not to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GaryGazza refer to me] on his userpage? [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 12:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
274358 +++$+++ Timeshift9 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274357 +++$+++ 274357 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.203370080E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ANicola_Roxon&diff=192296692&oldid=191967221 Sigh]... he just doesn't get it.  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ANicola_Roxon&diff=192296692&oldid=191967221 Sigh]... he just doesn't get it. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 13:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
274359 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274357 +++$+++ 274358 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.203380460E09 +++$+++ I removed the personal  comment about you and then deleted and selectively restored his userpage history without it. Gnang saw your your comments here and blocked Gary for 55 hours. But I was also reviewing his contribs at the same time and IMO, since his last block expired, he has made precious few, if any, constructive, productive contributions and I ended up deciding to unblock him and reblocked for longer (100 hours). I hope anyone who reviews it will reach the same conclusion and endorse the block. Will repost on his page shortly. Thanks, Timeshift, for letting us know that the problem was ongoing. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::I removed the personal  comment about you and then deleted and selectively restored his userpage history without it. Gnang saw your your comments here and blocked Gary for 55 hours. But I was also reviewing his contribs at the same time and IMO, since his last block expired, he has made precious few, if any, constructive, productive contributions and I ended up deciding to unblock him and reblocked for longer (100 hours). I hope anyone who reviews it will reach the same conclusion and endorse the block. Will repost on his page shortly. Thanks, Timeshift, for letting us know that the problem was ongoing. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 16:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

536502 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.157031840E09 +++$+++ Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|never biting new users]]. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an [[Wikipedia:Administrator|administrator]]. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~&#126;~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the \"Preferences\" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to [[Wikipedia:User page|tell us about]] [[User:{{PAGENAME}}|yourself]] and be [[Wikipedia:Bold|'''BOLD''']]! --  +++$+++ Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|never biting new users]]. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an [[Wikipedia:Administrator|administrator]]. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~&#126;~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to [[Wikipedia:User page|tell us about]] [[User:{{PAGENAME}}|yourself]] and be [[Wikipedia:Bold|'''BOLD''']]! -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|'''Samir''']]  <small>[[User_talk:Samir_(The_Scope)|धर्म]]</small> 06:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
536503 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536502 +++$+++ 536502 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.157154600E09 +++$+++ Gack! New user! *<s>reloads<\/s> smiles pleasantly in welcome* &mdash; ''' +++$+++ :Gack! New user! *<s>reloads</s> smiles pleasantly in welcome* &mdash; '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana_dzasta]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:Riana_dzasta|wreak havoc]]'''|'''[[Special:Contributions/Riana_dzasta|damage report]] </sub> 16:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

12215 +++$+++ MyMoloboaccount +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-22 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.287790260E09 +++$+++ I would rather want them to stay, since they will be of interest to the editor debating the issue. Also I would welcome your response to the questions regarding the content and sourcing of the publication(which are at odds with other sources showing political non-involvment of the victims).-- +++$+++ I would rather want them to stay, since they will be of interest to the editor debating the issue. Also I would welcome your response to the questions regarding the content and sourcing of the publication(which are at odds with other sources showing political non-involvment of the victims).--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 16:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
12216 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12215 +++$+++ 12215 +++$+++ 2010-10-22 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.287790500E09 +++$+++ I can address them but that section should be for uninvolved editors, not us. +++$+++ :I can address them but that section should be for uninvolved editors, not us.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 16:35, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

274360 +++$+++ ROxBo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-05 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.202227080E09 +++$+++ I think proven wrong, do you agree? See here: [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Wayne_Carey&oldid=188796897]] This rumour is indeed widespread. But the posting of rumours as fact, without verifiable sources, is a real potential problem for wikipedia. Wiki is not a forum page. Hope it's sunny in Adelaide!  +++$+++ I think proven wrong, do you agree? See here: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wayne_Carey&oldid=188796897]] This rumour is indeed widespread. But the posting of rumours as fact, without verifiable sources, is a real potential problem for wikipedia. Wiki is not a forum page. Hope it's sunny in Adelaide! [[User:ROxBo|ROxBo]] ([[User talk:ROxBo|talk]]) 07:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274361 +++$+++ ROxBo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.202229240E09 +++$+++ Agreed, it is at the users digression to delete of their discussion page at any time, but it is usually reserved for offensive or grossly inappropriate comment. Timeshift was very persistent in posting what has proven to be scurrilous rumour. I\u2019m not aiming to harass but it is a major lapse of editing integrity. I think this sort of editing should not be swept under the carpet, is all. +++$+++ :Agreed, it is at the users digression to delete of their discussion page at any time, but it is usually reserved for offensive or grossly inappropriate comment. Timeshift was very persistent in posting what has proven to be scurrilous rumour. I’m not aiming to harass but it is a major lapse of editing integrity. I think this sort of editing should not be swept under the carpet, is all.[[User:ROxBo|ROxBo]] ([[User talk:ROxBo|talk]]) 08:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274362 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274361 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.202233380E09 +++$+++ I didn't know about this Wayne Carey dispute until just today but obviously, we're not going to report someone's suicide without high quality sources and to do otherwise is not only a violation of [[WP:BLP|policy]] but also highly irresponsible, legally and ethically. That's the sort of stuff that makes people think Wikipedia is a bad, untrustworthy and unreliable website. However, it does not matter either way if you are right about the Wayne Carey dispute or not. You just can't make people keep things on their talk pages and if you try to, you are the one who will end up in trouble with admins and most likely blocked for disruption. Have a look at this essay: [[WP:DRC|Don't restore removed comments]]: \"If a user removes a comment from their own talk page, (legitimate or not), it should remain removed. By removing the comment, the user has verified that they have read it. The comment is still in the page history, so it is not important to keep it visible just to prove that the user was told about it...Users who repeatedly restore the same comment to another user's talk page may be blocked for violating the three-revert rule or harassing another user.\" Thank you for explaining what you were doing and why but please understand that you need to refrain from restoring comments to other people's pages.  +++$+++ ::I didn't know about this Wayne Carey dispute until just today but obviously, we're not going to report someone's suicide without high quality sources and to do otherwise is not only a violation of [[WP:BLP|policy]] but also highly irresponsible, legally and ethically. That's the sort of stuff that makes people think Wikipedia is a bad, untrustworthy and unreliable website. However, it does not matter either way if you are right about the Wayne Carey dispute or not. You just can't make people keep things on their talk pages and if you try to, you are the one who will end up in trouble with admins and most likely blocked for disruption. Have a look at this essay: [[WP:DRC|Don't restore removed comments]]: "If a user removes a comment from their own talk page, (legitimate or not), it should remain removed. By removing the comment, the user has verified that they have read it. The comment is still in the page history, so it is not important to keep it visible just to prove that the user was told about it...Users who repeatedly restore the same comment to another user's talk page may be blocked for violating the three-revert rule or harassing another user." Thank you for explaining what you were doing and why but please understand that you need to refrain from restoring comments to other people's pages. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274363 +++$+++ ROxBo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274362 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 10:15:00 +++$+++ 1.202235300E09 +++$+++ As an aside, it seemed you got on to Timeshift's talk page revision extraordinarily quickly. I can only presume you have an existing editing relationship... if this is true maybe you are in a position to politely ask TS about his \"high quality sources\" (none to date, 2 days later) or how ethical and responsible these actions are.  +++$+++ :::As an aside, it seemed you got on to Timeshift's talk page revision extraordinarily quickly. I can only presume you have an existing editing relationship... if this is true maybe you are in a position to politely ask TS about his "high quality sources" (none to date, 2 days later) or how ethical and responsible these actions are. [[User:ROxBo|ROxBo]] ([[User talk:ROxBo|talk]]) 10:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274364 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274363 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.202237100E09 +++$+++ My comments above about making Wikipedia look bad etc were not directed at you but at people trying to add that sort of rubbish to an encyclopedia article. I was trying to say that yes, I agree with what you said about the Wayne Carey issue, BUT, that doesn't give you an excuse to restore deleted messages on someone's talk page. You might be in the right with your opinions about making irresponsible remarks in biographies of living people, but you still cannot hammer that home on Timeshift's page by restoring your posts. I think from the sound of your reply that maybe you misunderstood what I was saying and thought I was blaming you for the Wayne Carey situation. I understand that you weren't involved in edit warring on the article and were just expressing your opinion. I don't have a \"existing editing relationship\" with Timeshift beyond the fact that I have had to warn him before and I saw your message quickly because his talk page is still on my watchlist from when I have warned him in the past. So if you're trying to suggest that I'm biased or 'sticking up' for him because of a bias or friendship or something then you are most definitely mistaken.  +++$+++ ::::My comments above about making Wikipedia look bad etc were not directed at you but at people trying to add that sort of rubbish to an encyclopedia article. I was trying to say that yes, I agree with what you said about the Wayne Carey issue, BUT, that doesn't give you an excuse to restore deleted messages on someone's talk page. You might be in the right with your opinions about making irresponsible remarks in biographies of living people, but you still cannot hammer that home on Timeshift's page by restoring your posts. I think from the sound of your reply that maybe you misunderstood what I was saying and thought I was blaming you for the Wayne Carey situation. I understand that you weren't involved in edit warring on the article and were just expressing your opinion. I don't have a "existing editing relationship" with Timeshift beyond the fact that I have had to warn him before and I saw your message quickly because his talk page is still on my watchlist from when I have warned him in the past. So if you're trying to suggest that I'm biased or 'sticking up' for him because of a bias or friendship or something then you are most definitely mistaken. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274365 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 10:26:00 +++$+++ 1.202235960E09 +++$+++ Hi ROxBO - have been watching this and am aware that Sarah (see above) is trying to maintain an important wiki-break.  My suggestion is to walk away.  Quite frankly you are correct - Timeshift is wrong and Wayne Carey lives - but pushing the barrow any further is going to make you seem vindictive so can we get back to the land of the living and do some important editing?  What do you say?-- +++$+++ *Hi ROxBO - have been watching this and am aware that Sarah (see above) is trying to maintain an important wiki-break.  My suggestion is to walk away.  Quite frankly you are correct - Timeshift is wrong and Wayne Carey lives - but pushing the barrow any further is going to make you seem vindictive so can we get back to the land of the living and do some important editing?  What do you say?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 10:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274366 +++$+++ ROxBo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274365 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.202236980E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, but it is strange that no one shares my approach to this of a sense of ''responsibility'' or ''personal accountability''. Politicians? \"Just letting it go\" sounds like asking for a kinda lame excuse, really this should be seen through. Ebay does it well with a rating system for buyers\/sellers - maybe editors should have the same and this could be just a negative strike. +++$+++ ::Fair enough, but it is strange that no one shares my approach to this of a sense of ''responsibility'' or ''personal accountability''. Politicians? "Just letting it go" sounds like asking for a kinda lame excuse, really this should be seen through. Ebay does it well with a rating system for buyers/sellers - maybe editors should have the same and this could be just a negative strike.[[User:ROxBo|ROxBo]] ([[User talk:ROxBo|talk]]) 10:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274367 +++$+++ ROxBo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274365 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.202236980E09 +++$+++ ps. I see from TS history page others have shared my concerns, but had them deleted by TS immediately to hide them from easy review. +++$+++ :: ps. I see from TS history page others have shared my concerns, but had them deleted by TS immediately to hide them from easy review.[[User:ROxBo|ROxBo]] ([[User talk:ROxBo|talk]]) 10:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274368 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274367 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.202237340E09 +++$+++ We do share your views about responsible editing. Wikipedia has policies that require highly quality sourcing on BLP's (biographies of living people) and the sorts of speculative remarks you're talking about are absolutely unacceptable. You seem to be mixing two issues: what we don't share your views on is forcing people to keep your posts active on their page.  +++$+++ :::We do share your views about responsible editing. Wikipedia has policies that require highly quality sourcing on BLP's (biographies of living people) and the sorts of speculative remarks you're talking about are absolutely unacceptable. You seem to be mixing two issues: what we don't share your views on is forcing people to keep your posts active on their page. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274369 +++$+++ ROxBo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274368 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.202239920E09 +++$+++ C'mon, please restrain from misrepresenting me. No one is forcing anyone! An undo is not a call to arms, please. But ok, I accept that a further post repeating similar content would have been the appropriate response from me, not an undo.  +++$+++ ::::C'mon, please restrain from misrepresenting me. No one is forcing anyone! An undo is not a call to arms, please. But ok, I accept that a further post repeating similar content would have been the appropriate response from me, not an undo. [[User:ROxBo|ROxBo]] ([[User talk:ROxBo|talk]]) 11:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274370 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274369 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Okay, ROxBo, I think it would be best to bring this to a close as we seem to be talking at cross purposes. The point is, you're not to restore messages to other people's talk pages or undo their deletion of messages on their own pages. It's not about \"a further post repeating similar content\". Please do not restore deleted comments on other people's talk pages. It is a universally held custom on Wikipedia that we allow people as much latitude as possible on their own talk pages as long as they aren't violating policy such as NPA, CIVIL, 3RR, etc. If you do undo deletion, you're likely to be blocked. Thankyou for the chat and enjoy the rest of your night, 11:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :::::Okay, ROxBo, I think it would be best to bring this to a close as we seem to be talking at cross purposes. The point is, you're not to restore messages to other people's talk pages or undo their deletion of messages on their own pages. It's not about "a further post repeating similar content". Please do not restore deleted comments on other people's talk pages. It is a universally held custom on Wikipedia that we allow people as much latitude as possible on their own talk pages as long as they aren't violating policy such as NPA, CIVIL, 3RR, etc. If you do undo deletion, you're likely to be blocked. Thankyou for the chat and enjoy the rest of your night, 11:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274371 +++$+++ ROxBo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274370 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.202243220E09 +++$+++ 'ok, I accept that a further post repeating similar content would have been the appropriate response from me, not an undo'. unpaste. The [[elephant in the room]] here has been missed though, I agree. Thank you for the chat as well, best wishes.  +++$+++ :::::: 'ok, I accept that a further post repeating similar content would have been the appropriate response from me, not an undo'. unpaste. The [[elephant in the room]] here has been missed though, I agree. Thank you for the chat as well, best wishes. [[User:ROxBo|ROxBo]] ([[User talk:ROxBo|talk]]) 12:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274372 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274371 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.202244720E09 +++$+++ Oh boy, this is just ridiculous. You're playing word games. Don't undo, restore, rollback, revert, reiterate, repeat, rephrase, redraft, revamp, rehash, reword, restate, rewrite, repost, etc, etc, etc, messages that have been deleted by other people from their own talk pages. Undos reverts etc are not acceptable. Obviously, \"a further post repeating similar content\" is equally not acceptable but that wasn't what we were talking about, hence my comment above. You're just playing a semantic game and I'm not going to waste any more time on this. Just leave people alone when they remove your messages. And if you don't, you can expect to be blocked.  +++$+++ :::::::Oh boy, this is just ridiculous. You're playing word games. Don't undo, restore, rollback, revert, reiterate, repeat, rephrase, redraft, revamp, rehash, reword, restate, rewrite, repost, etc, etc, etc, messages that have been deleted by other people from their own talk pages. Undos reverts etc are not acceptable. Obviously, "a further post repeating similar content" is equally not acceptable but that wasn't what we were talking about, hence my comment above. You're just playing a semantic game and I'm not going to waste any more time on this. Just leave people alone when they remove your messages. And if you don't, you can expect to be blocked. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274373 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274368 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.202237940E09 +++$+++ ROxBo (sorry Sarah won't take too many more pixels) - we do have a rating system - it's called an edit history.  Any admin worth her  or his salt will have a look at the history on the talk page of the editor involved in every case of concern.  That history is always there no matter how many times an editor blanks their page. Okay?  I admire your concern but that is the beauty of this anarchist system - it lets everyone in but no-one gets away with anything forever, because everything is recorded. Now lets get back to work.  Best wishes -- +++$+++ :::*ROxBo (sorry Sarah won't take too many more pixels) - we do have a rating system - it's called an edit history.  Any admin worth her  or his salt will have a look at the history on the talk page of the editor involved in every case of concern.  That history is always there no matter how many times an editor blanks their page. Okay?  I admire your concern but that is the beauty of this anarchist system - it lets everyone in but no-one gets away with anything forever, because everything is recorded. Now lets get back to work.  Best wishes --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 10:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274374 +++$+++ ROxBo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274368 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.202239920E09 +++$+++ ok!  +++$+++ ::::ok! [[User:ROxBo|ROxBo]] ([[User talk:ROxBo|talk]]) 11:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274375 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274374 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.202241360E09 +++$+++ No need to apologise, Steven. My page is always open to you my friend and you're welcome to use as many pixels as you like! lol :) Thank you for your help; you're a very good friend. I was just looking through the images for a picture of a \"Knight in Shining Armour\" to thank you for looking out for me and for keeping an eye on my pages while I've been away. :)  +++$+++ ::::*No need to apologise, Steven. My page is always open to you my friend and you're welcome to use as many pixels as you like! lol :) Thank you for your help; you're a very good friend. I was just looking through the images for a picture of a "Knight in Shining Armour" to thank you for looking out for me and for keeping an eye on my pages while I've been away. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274376 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274360 +++$+++ 274374 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.202274720E09 +++$+++ Always a pleasure Sarah. Lovely just to see you around. Take care. -- +++$+++ :::::Always a pleasure Sarah. Lovely just to see you around. Take care. --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 21:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

12217 +++$+++ MyMoloboaccount +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-24 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.287970620E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 18:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
12218 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12217 +++$+++ 12217 +++$+++ 2010-10-24 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.287985680E09 +++$+++ I would like that too and have generally been civil. +++$+++ :I would like that too and have generally been civil.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 22:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

12221 +++$+++ Toddy1 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-05 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.288986420E09 +++$+++ In your edits of the article on [[Lvov]] please remember that according to the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Acronyms and abbreviations]] ''no full stop is commonly preferred in British and other usage '' with abbreviations.  So please do not put ''pg. 42'', please use ''p42'' instead.-- +++$+++ In your edits of the article on [[Lvov]] please remember that according to the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Acronyms and abbreviations]] ''no full stop is commonly preferred in British and other usage '' with abbreviations.  So please do not put ''pg. 42'', please use ''p42'' instead.--[[User:Toddy1|Toddy1]] ([[User talk:Toddy1|talk]]) 12:47, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
12222 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12221 +++$+++ 12221 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.288987320E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I'm used to American guidelines. Does wikipedia prefer British usage? If so I'll try to switch over. I've published academic works using the style I use here, so I apologise in advance  if I absent-mindedly forget. Habits are hard to break.... +++$+++ :Sorry, I'm used to American guidelines. Does wikipedia prefer British usage? If so I'll try to switch over. I've published academic works using the style I use here, so I apologise in advance  if I absent-mindedly forget. Habits are hard to break....[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 13:02, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

536510 +++$+++ Daniel.Bryant +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-06 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.157551140E09 +++$+++ Just letting you know that I redirected your old user talk page ([[User talk:RandyWang]]) to this page. I noticed a few red links when you linked to your old talk page, and in case someone follows it, it would be best if they ended up here. Cheers, <font face=\"sans-serif\">''' +++$+++ Just letting you know that I redirected your old user talk page ([[User talk:RandyWang]]) to this page. I noticed a few red links when you linked to your old talk page, and in case someone follows it, it would be best if they ended up here. Cheers, <font face="sans-serif">'''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|Daniel]][[Special:Random|.]][[User talk:Daniel.Bryant|Bryant]]'''</font> 06:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
536511 +++$+++ Daniel.Bryant +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536510 +++$+++ 536510 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.157551260E09 +++$+++ Oh, and one more thing - make sure you move your talk archives! <font face=\"sans-serif\">''' +++$+++ :Oh, and one more thing - make sure you move your talk archives! <font face="sans-serif">'''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|Daniel]][[Special:Random|.]][[User talk:Daniel.Bryant|Bryant]]'''</font> 07:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
536512 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536510 +++$+++ 536511 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.157553840E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I had completely forgotten to do that! :) [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::Thanks! I had completely forgotten to do that! :) [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''patch''']]</sub></span>) 07:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

12223 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-11 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.289480640E09 +++$+++ Not sure how interested you are in the topic but the article is becoming under siege from some neo-Soviet POV pushers, just a heads up --''' +++$+++ Not sure how interested you are in the topic but the article is becoming under siege from some neo-Soviet POV pushers, just a heads up --'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 05:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
12224 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12223 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.289944020E09 +++$+++ Thank you! +++$+++ ::Thank you![[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 13:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

570016 +++$+++ Matt Crypto +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-30 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.138690800E09 +++$+++ Hi David, you're doing some great work on the hash function from block cipher stuff, don't really want to interrupt, but I thought I'd suggest you might like to upload your diagrams to [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org Commons] instead of the English Wikipedia. The end result is the same, but the files can be shared by all the language projects.  +++$+++ Hi David, you're doing some great work on the hash function from block cipher stuff, don't really want to interrupt, but I thought I'd suggest you might like to upload your diagrams to [http://commons.wikimedia.org Commons] instead of the English Wikipedia. The end result is the same, but the files can be shared by all the language projects. [[User:Matt Crypto|&mdash; Matt <small>Crypto</small>]] 23:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
570017 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570016 +++$+++ 570016 +++$+++ 2006-01-31 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.138737060E09 +++$+++ Thanks Matt. By the way, I have seen how much excellent work you put in on other crypto articles so I should say the same: You do FANTASTIC work around here! I was just learning to make svg images so I had just uploaded svg versions of those images instead of the png images to english Wikipedia as you wrote that. (Which makes them easier to edit for others in the future.) So, when I saw your comment I read up on the commons thing. Wow, I didn't know that it shared name space for images with all Wikipedias! I will definitely use commons for images from now on. So I uploaded the images to commons too. Unfortunately it seems it takes ages until any admin will delete the images here on english Wikipedia even though they are tagged for deletion due to being copied to commons. So since you are an admin feel free to speedy delete the three svg images in the article. -- +++$+++ :Thanks Matt. By the way, I have seen how much excellent work you put in on other crypto articles so I should say the same: You do FANTASTIC work around here! I was just learning to make svg images so I had just uploaded svg versions of those images instead of the png images to english Wikipedia as you wrote that. (Which makes them easier to edit for others in the future.) So, when I saw your comment I read up on the commons thing. Wow, I didn't know that it shared name space for images with all Wikipedias! I will definitely use commons for images from now on. So I uploaded the images to commons too. Unfortunately it seems it takes ages until any admin will delete the images here on english Wikipedia even though they are tagged for deletion due to being copied to commons. So since you are an admin feel free to speedy delete the three svg images in the article. --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 11:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
570018 +++$+++ Matt Crypto +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570016 +++$+++ 570017 +++$+++ 2006-01-31 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.138759860E09 +++$+++ Great. I've deleted the copies here. Allegedly, I'm ''meant'' to be on a short WikiBreak (I'm an addict, what can I say?) but I hope to bump into you again after next Monday!  +++$+++ :: Great. I've deleted the copies here. Allegedly, I'm ''meant'' to be on a short WikiBreak (I'm an addict, what can I say?) but I hope to bump into you again after next Monday! [[User:Matt Crypto|&mdash; Matt <small>Crypto</small>]] 18:11, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

12229 +++$+++ Hallersarmy +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12229 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-13 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.294921800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Hallersarmy|Hallersarmy]] ([[User talk:Hallersarmy|talk]]) 04:30, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
12230 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12229 +++$+++ 12229 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.294922220E09 +++$+++ Faustian hasn't made three reverts today. You just made your fourth. \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ :Faustian hasn't made three reverts today. You just made your fourth. —&nbsp;[[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 04:37, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
12231 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12229 +++$+++ 12230 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.294924980E09 +++$+++ I just made my third and final revert. I did this only because I added comments to the talk page detailing my rationale for the moves being made. This revert consists primarily of just re-adding referenced material to relaible sources that are being removed. +++$+++ ::I just made my third and final revert. I did this only because I added comments to the talk page detailing my rationale for the moves being made. This revert consists primarily of just re-adding referenced material to relaible sources that are being removed.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 05:23, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

274377 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-05 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.202265360E09 +++$+++ Hello Sarah, I noticed you've been granting rollback. :) Anyway, I thought that you might want to know that two userspace template messages, [[User:Acalamari\/Rollback]] and [[User:NoSeptember\/Rollback]], are available if you want to give an informing message to someone if you've given them rollback; I created a template in my userspace because since I've been giving out rollback a lot, it was easier for me to use a template to inform people. Thanks, Sarah!  +++$+++ Hello Sarah, I noticed you've been granting rollback. :) Anyway, I thought that you might want to know that two userspace template messages, [[User:Acalamari/Rollback]] and [[User:NoSeptember/Rollback]], are available if you want to give an informing message to someone if you've given them rollback; I created a template in my userspace because since I've been giving out rollback a lot, it was easier for me to use a template to inform people. Thanks, Sarah! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274378 +++$+++ Ryan Postlethwaite +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.202265600E09 +++$+++ Hi Acalamari, just a thought but why don't you move it into template space? Then it would be more accessible for you and everyone else. How does {{tl|Rollbackgiven}} sound?  +++$+++ :Hi Acalamari, just a thought but why don't you move it into template space? Then it would be more accessible for you and everyone else. How does {{tl|Rollbackgiven}} sound? [[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|'''<font color="#000088">Ry<font color="#220066">an<font color="#550044"> P<font color="#770022">os<font color="#aa0000">tl</font>et</font>hw</font>ai</font>te</font>''']] 18:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274379 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ 274378 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.202265840E09 +++$+++ Greetings, Poss. It's nice to see you dropping by my talk page, too. :)  +++$+++ ::Greetings, Poss. It's nice to see you dropping by my talk page, too. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 18:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274380 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ 274378 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.202265960E09 +++$+++ Well, I did have that in mind, but I was concerned in case it wasn't a template appropriate for the template namespace.  +++$+++ ::Well, I did have that in mind, but I was concerned in case it wasn't a template appropriate for the template namespace. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274381 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.202265840E09 +++$+++ Cool, thanks mate. Heh, nothing gets passed you these days! :) The people I gave it to tonight I've already emailed but I'll certain use your templates in future. Thanks for dropping by! Take care,  +++$+++ :Cool, thanks mate. Heh, nothing gets passed you these days! :) The people I gave it to tonight I've already emailed but I'll certain use your templates in future. Thanks for dropping by! Take care, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 18:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274382 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ 274381 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.202265960E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) Glad to be of help.  +++$+++ ::You're welcome. :) Glad to be of help. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274383 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ 274382 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.202266620E09 +++$+++ Mr Acalamari, I have a suggestion. In this line: \"the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, you can be trusted to use rollback correctly...\", I think you need to add something like \"I think\", \"I believe\" \"it appears\" etc like this: \"the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, [I believe] you can be trusted to use rollback correctly...\" Just a suggestion, I think it would read better. :)  +++$+++ :::Mr Acalamari, I have a suggestion. In this line: "the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, you can be trusted to use rollback correctly...", I think you need to add something like "I think", "I believe" "it appears" etc like this: "the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, [I believe] you can be trusted to use rollback correctly..." Just a suggestion, I think it would read better. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 18:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274384 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ 274383 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.202267040E09 +++$+++ Actually, I think that was the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Acalamari\/Rollback&oldid=187802170 original wording]. :) Change it back, maybe?  +++$+++ ::::Actually, I think that was the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Acalamari/Rollback&oldid=187802170 original wording]. :) Change it back, maybe? [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274385 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ 274384 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.202267640E09 +++$+++ Hmmm...I think you still need an \"I think I can trust you...\" or \"it appears I can trust you...\" etc in that version, too. :)  +++$+++ :::::Hmmm...I think you still need an "I think I can trust you..." or "it appears I can trust you..." etc in that version, too. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 19:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274386 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ 274385 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.202267820E09 +++$+++ Just did it: I think it reads better as well. Will also move the template as Ryan suggested. :) Thanks for the help!  +++$+++ ::::::Just did it: I think it reads better as well. Will also move the template as Ryan suggested. :) Thanks for the help! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274387 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274377 +++$+++ 274386 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.202268240E09 +++$+++ Oh, and finally, {{tl|Rollbackgiven}}.  +++$+++ :::::::Oh, and finally, {{tl|Rollbackgiven}}. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

12234 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-01 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.301717580E09 +++$+++ I'm going to start a new article, but just wondering what you think it should be called. For the entirety of the Polish-Ukrainian conflict that encompassed the massacres of Poles in Volhynia, and Galicia, and also the 'retaliations'. What works best: \"Polish-Ukrainian civil war\" \"Polish-Ukrainian conflict (1943-1947)\" or \"Polish-Ukrainian war (1943-1947)\"?--''' +++$+++ I'm going to start a new article, but just wondering what you think it should be called. For the entirety of the Polish-Ukrainian conflict that encompassed the massacres of Poles in Volhynia, and Galicia, and also the 'retaliations'. What works best: "Polish-Ukrainian civil war" "Polish-Ukrainian conflict (1943-1947)" or "Polish-Ukrainian war (1943-1947)"?--'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 21:13, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
12235 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12234 +++$+++ 12234 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.301725380E09 +++$+++ The middle one seems best and most nuetral. Good luck! I will help if I can, but am too busy to do so substantially. +++$+++ :The middle one seems best and most nuetral. Good luck! I will help if I can, but am too busy to do so substantially.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 23:23, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
12236 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12234 +++$+++ 12235 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.301725980E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I asked Magocsi as well and he said \"conflict\" is the best descriptor of it. Snyder, among others, refer to it as a civil war several times (Piotrowski, obviously, says anyone who holds this view \"''doesn't know what they're talking about''\"), so I guess I'll include it in the lede. I wrote a paper on the subject recently, so to do the article I just need to port it over and reformat the refs, and remove any stuff relating to the thesis. It's already broken down with background and each side's actions, and a section on death toll, so it'll leapfrog the stub phase and be done pretty quick. Hopefully this article will alleviate the problems the 'massacres of poles' article brings when polish editors want to censor facts on its context, and it'll allow that article to get trimmed down and refocused.--''' +++$+++ ::Yeah, I asked Magocsi as well and he said "conflict" is the best descriptor of it. Snyder, among others, refer to it as a civil war several times (Piotrowski, obviously, says anyone who holds this view "''doesn't know what they're talking about''"), so I guess I'll include it in the lede. I wrote a paper on the subject recently, so to do the article I just need to port it over and reformat the refs, and remove any stuff relating to the thesis. It's already broken down with background and each side's actions, and a section on death toll, so it'll leapfrog the stub phase and be done pretty quick. Hopefully this article will alleviate the problems the 'massacres of poles' article brings when polish editors want to censor facts on its context, and it'll allow that article to get trimmed down and refocused.--'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 23:33, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

12238 +++$+++ Paweł5586 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-18 07:22:00 +++$+++ 1.303136520E09 +++$+++ Could you read [http:\/\/www.cjc.ca\/2011\/04\/12\/international-scholars-issue-open-letter-on-the-uccla-ucc-and-the-cmhr\/ this] and [http:\/\/www.kakanien.ac.at\/beitr\/fallstudie\/GRossolinski-Liebe2.pdf this]. I think its worth to know these facts. Redgards-- +++$+++ Could you read [http://www.cjc.ca/2011/04/12/international-scholars-issue-open-letter-on-the-uccla-ucc-and-the-cmhr/ this] and [http://www.kakanien.ac.at/beitr/fallstudie/GRossolinski-Liebe2.pdf this]. I think its worth to know these facts. Redgards--[[User:Paweł5586|Paweł5586]] ([[User talk:Paweł5586|talk]]) 07:22, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
12239 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12238 +++$+++ 12238 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.303154880E09 +++$+++ The letter sounds reasonable to me. What's the point of it? Is there a wikipedia article about this debate and about the museum in Canada? +++$+++ :The letter sounds reasonable to me. What's the point of it? Is there a wikipedia article about this debate and about the museum in Canada?[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 12:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

12240 +++$+++ Galassi +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-22 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.308798300E09 +++$+++ \u201cAn Unlikely Alliance: the 1907 Ukrainian-Jewish Electoral Coalition.\u201d Yohanan Petrovsky-Shtern, History, et al. Nations and Nationalism 15 (3) 2009: 483-505. The authors examine the political alliance between Ukrainian and Jewish national activists in the 1907 Austrian elections. They find that, rather than treating each other as staunch enemies, the two sets of activists were able to overcome profound differences in order to form an electoral alliance that would forge a new paradigm in Ukrainian-Jewish relations.-- +++$+++ “An Unlikely Alliance: the 1907 Ukrainian-Jewish Electoral Coalition.” Yohanan Petrovsky-Shtern, History, et al. Nations and Nationalism 15 (3) 2009: 483-505. The authors examine the political alliance between Ukrainian and Jewish national activists in the 1907 Austrian elections. They find that, rather than treating each other as staunch enemies, the two sets of activists were able to overcome profound differences in order to form an electoral alliance that would forge a new paradigm in Ukrainian-Jewish relations.--[[User:Galassi|Galassi]] ([[User talk:Galassi|talk]]) 20:05, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
12241 +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12240 +++$+++ 12240 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.308806100E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Any links? I don't have access to an academic library. +++$+++ :Thanks. Any links? I don't have access to an academic library.[[User:Faustian|Faustian]] ([[User talk:Faustian#top|talk]]) 22:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
12242 +++$+++ Galassi +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12240 +++$+++ 12241 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.308809160E09 +++$+++ You might want to ask YPS himself. He is approachable.-- +++$+++ ::You might want to ask YPS himself. He is approachable.--[[User:Galassi|Galassi]] ([[User talk:Galassi|talk]]) 23:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
12243 +++$+++ Galassi +++$+++ Faustian +++$+++ 12240 +++$+++ 12242 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.308940680E09 +++$+++ Unrelated, but useful - http:\/\/www.istpravda.com.ua\/articles\/2011\/06\/23\/43692\/.-- +++$+++ ::: Unrelated, but useful - http://www.istpravda.com.ua/articles/2011/06/23/43692/.--[[User:Galassi|Galassi]] ([[User talk:Galassi|talk]]) 11:38, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

501125 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Mattythewhite +++$+++ 501125 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-13 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.255474920E09 +++$+++ Hi Matty, your last edit to Begovic has made a bit wrong, you have added a year which is ok but it repeats 2008 2008 so 2009 is correct and the information is that he left yeovil last november and is back at portsmouth since then and he has played one match for portsmouth this year so he has returned to his original club that loaned him out , I am unsure how we do that, when the subject returns to the club that loaned him out? Anyway it is for sure not correct now. Could you have another look at it, thanks  +++$+++ Hi Matty, your last edit to Begovic has made a bit wrong, you have added a year which is ok but it repeats 2008 2008 so 2009 is correct and the information is that he left yeovil last november and is back at portsmouth since then and he has played one match for portsmouth this year so he has returned to his original club that loaned him out , I am unsure how we do that, when the subject returns to the club that loaned him out? Anyway it is for sure not correct now. Could you have another look at it, thanks [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 16:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
501126 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Mattythewhite +++$+++ 501125 +++$+++ 501125 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.255484760E09 +++$+++ Right, thanks.  +++$+++ :Right, thanks. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 18:46, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

274388 +++$+++ Dustihowe +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-05 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.202268480E09 +++$+++ Hi, I was wondering if you would grant me rollback rights. I have been doing some recent changes editing and have come across a lot of vandalism. This feature would be of some great help. Thanks and Happy Editing,  +++$+++ Hi, I was wondering if you would grant me rollback rights. I have been doing some recent changes editing and have come across a lot of vandalism. This feature would be of some great help. Thanks and Happy Editing, [[User:Dustihowe|'''<font color="#ff0000">D</font><font color="#ff6600">u</font><font color="#009900">s</font><font color="#0000ff">t</font><font color="#6600cc">i</font>''']][[User talk:Dustihowe|<sup>talk</sup>]] 19:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
274389 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274388 +++$+++ 274388 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.202269500E09 +++$+++ Well, I would have given it to you but I see that you are asking various other people at the same time and I'm personally not comfortable with that kind of shopping around. So I shall decline at this time and leave it to one of the other admins you've asked.  +++$+++ :Well, I would have given it to you but I see that you are asking various other people at the same time and I'm personally not comfortable with that kind of shopping around. So I shall decline at this time and leave it to one of the other admins you've asked. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 19:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

12245 +++$+++ wmcg +++$+++ Edgarde +++$+++ 12245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-27 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.303947600E09 +++$+++ wmcg  +++$+++ wmcg [[User:Wmcg|Wmcg]] ([[User talk:Wmcg|talk]]) 16:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
12246 +++$+++ Edgarde +++$+++ Edgarde +++$+++ 12245 +++$+++ 12245 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.304055240E09 +++$+++ By the way, I'm sorry about the trouble you've been having, as reported in the domestic violence article. Stay free, man. \/  +++$+++ :By the way, I'm sorry about the trouble you've been having, as reported in the domestic violence article. Stay free, man. / [[User:Edgarde|edg]]<small> [[User_talk:Edgarde|☺]] [[Special:Contributions/Edgarde|☭]]</small> 22:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

274390 +++$+++  Southern Texas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-06 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.202284800E09 +++$+++ Thank you for reminding me, I actually meant to push the undo button but I accidentally pressed rollback. It won't happen again.-- +++$+++ Thank you for reminding me, I actually meant to push the undo button but I accidentally pressed rollback. It won't happen again.--[[User:Southern Texas|'''<font color = "red"><span style="font-family: Rockwell ; font-size: 12pt">S</span></font>''']][[User talk: Southern Texas|'''<font color = "blue"><span style="font-family: Rockwell ; font-size: 12pt">TX</span></font>''']] 00:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
274391 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274390 +++$+++ 274390 +++$+++ 2008-02-06 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.202286720E09 +++$+++ That's great, thanks for letting me know.  +++$+++ :That's great, thanks for letting me know. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

526329 +++$+++ Fang Aili +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526329 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-13 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.160770980E09 +++$+++ Not at all, restore if you like. :) -- +++$+++ Not at all, restore if you like. :) --[[User:Fang Aili|Fang Aili]] <sup>[[User talk:Fang Aili|<font color="green">talk</font>]]</sup> 13:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
526330 +++$+++ Fang Aili +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526329 +++$+++ 526329 +++$+++ 2006-10-13 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.160773020E09 +++$+++ It looks great. Good job saving it. -- +++$+++ :It looks great. Good job saving it. --[[User:Fang Aili|Fang Aili]] <sup>[[User talk:Fang Aili|<font color="green">talk</font>]]</sup> 13:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

274393 +++$+++ Solumeiras +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-07 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.202415480E09 +++$+++ It's nothing too serious, just [[stress (medicine)|stress]] at the moment, but I have marked the editor review as being suspended until I recover from stress. Thank you for returning to Wikipedia, I thought you had disappeared. Thanks, -- +++$+++ It's nothing too serious, just [[stress (medicine)|stress]] at the moment, but I have marked the editor review as being suspended until I recover from stress. Thank you for returning to Wikipedia, I thought you had disappeared. Thanks, --[[User:Solumeiras|Solumeiras]] ([[User talk:Solumeiras|talk]]) 12:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
274394 +++$+++ Solumeiras +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274393 +++$+++ 274393 +++$+++ 2008-02-07 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.202416260E09 +++$+++ In my last RfA under my old username SunStar Net, people accused me of being a sockpuppet, but I have put my full user history up for people to read - have a look. Thanks for the reply, and hopefully the stress will be gone by the weekend. -- +++$+++ * In my last RfA under my old username SunStar Net, people accused me of being a sockpuppet, but I have put my full user history up for people to read - have a look. Thanks for the reply, and hopefully the stress will be gone by the weekend. --[[User:Solumeiras|Solumeiras]] ([[User talk:Solumeiras|talk]]) 12:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
274395 +++$+++ Solumeiras +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274393 +++$+++ 274394 +++$+++ 2008-02-07 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.202416260E09 +++$+++ As regards sprotection, no thank you. I was just testing a javascript. -- +++$+++ ::As regards sprotection, no thank you. I was just testing a javascript. --[[User:Solumeiras|Solumeiras]] ([[User talk:Solumeiras|talk]]) 12:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
274396 +++$+++ Solumeiras +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274393 +++$+++ 274393 +++$+++ 2008-02-07 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.202427120E09 +++$+++ The tag was out-of-date, so I removed it from my user talk page\/editor review. -- +++$+++ * The tag was out-of-date, so I removed it from my user talk page/editor review. --[[User:Solumeiras|Solumeiras]] ([[User talk:Solumeiras|talk]]) 15:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

536538 +++$+++ Spawn Man +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-23 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.159079820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your great comments on my editor review. However I've made a reply their about a couple of things I wasn't sure about. If you have the time to check it out, it would be greatly appreciated. Have a nice day.  +++$+++ Thanks for your great comments on my editor review. However I've made a reply their about a couple of things I wasn't sure about. If you have the time to check it out, it would be greatly appreciated. Have a nice day. [[User:Spawn Man|Spawn Man]] 23:37, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
536539 +++$+++ Spawn Man +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536538 +++$+++ 536538 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.159118340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments Davey! Appreciate the constructive comments which I'll definitely give a shot! Thanks,  +++$+++ :Thanks for your comments Davey! Appreciate the constructive comments which I'll definitely give a shot! Thanks, [[User:Spawn Man|Spawn Man]] 10:19, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

536541 +++$+++ Bethling +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.159129320E09 +++$+++ There's really no time you have to wait for to re-nominate the article.  Basically, once everything is set, you can just put it back on the list :)  ---  +++$+++ There's really no time you have to wait for to re-nominate the article.  Basically, once everything is set, you can just put it back on the list :)  --- [[User:Bethling |<font color="#BB45AA">The Bethling</font>]][[User Talk:Bethling|<sup>(Talk)</sup>]] 13:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
536542 +++$+++ Bethling +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536541 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-25 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.159233480E09 +++$+++ Took another look at it.  It looks good.   If I reviewed it the next time around, I'd pass it.  Good job on the article :) ---  +++$+++ ::  Took another look at it.  It looks good.   If I reviewed it the next time around, I'd pass it.  Good job on the article :) --- [[User:Bethling |<font color="#BB45AA">The Bethling</font>]][[User Talk:Bethling|<sup>(Talk)</sup>]] 18:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

274398 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-07 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.202447220E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/Archtransit#Regular_response_to_this_long_version_RFC You're right, about the mentorship - I guess it's a bit early to even think about me even attempting to admin coach Archtransit].  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Archtransit#Regular_response_to_this_long_version_RFC You're right, about the mentorship - I guess it's a bit early to even think about me even attempting to admin coach Archtransit]. [[User:Rudget|<span style="color:#801818;font-weight:bold">Rudget</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Rudget|.]] 21:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
274399 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274398 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-07 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.202448360E09 +++$+++ No problem.  +++$+++ ::No problem. [[User:Rudget|<span style="color:#801818;font-weight:bold">Rudget</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Rudget|.]] 21:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

274400 +++$+++ Pairadox +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-11 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.202724120E09 +++$+++ You may be interested in contributing to [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#NYScholar_block_overturned|this discussion]] about the block of NYScholar at AN\/I.  +++$+++ You may be interested in contributing to [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#NYScholar_block_overturned|this discussion]] about the block of NYScholar at AN/I. [[User:Pairadox|Pairadox]] ([[User talk:Pairadox|talk]]) 02:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
274401 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274400 +++$+++ 274400 +++$+++ 2008-02-11 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.202730420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up. Much appreciated. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up. Much appreciated. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

613712 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613712 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-19 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.245434760E09 +++$+++ I ''might'' be able to help ''a little'' with ''[[The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs]]'', as I got [[Cnidaria]] to GA, but I know zip about botany. Other factors that limit my ability to contribute are: I'm moving house 26 June 2009, which will disrupt my activity at WP for a bit; I have quite a long [[User:Philcha\/Sandbox#To_do | agenda]] of my own; you guys are more familiar w the sources. However if you can stand another GA review by me ... :-)  -- +++$+++ I ''might'' be able to help ''a little'' with ''[[The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs]]'', as I got [[Cnidaria]] to GA, but I know zip about botany. Other factors that limit my ability to contribute are: I'm moving house 26 June 2009, which will disrupt my activity at WP for a bit; I have quite a long [[User:Philcha/Sandbox#To_do | agenda]] of my own; you guys are more familiar w the sources. However if you can stand another GA review by me ... :-)  --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 11:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
613713 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613712 +++$+++ 613712 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.245440760E09 +++$+++ I think it's probably best to list them at GAN - someone else might be free to review before I am, and we should avoid any suspicion of collusion. There's still a fair chance that I'd pick them up within a month (AFAIK the approx waiting time at GAN on biology), as few editors and reviewers feel comfortable with wide-scope topics. -- +++$+++ :I think it's probably best to list them at GAN - someone else might be free to review before I am, and we should avoid any suspicion of collusion. There's still a fair chance that I'd pick them up within a month (AFAIK the approx waiting time at GAN on biology), as few editors and reviewers feel comfortable with wide-scope topics. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 12:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
613714 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613712 +++$+++ 613712 +++$+++ 2009-06-21 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.245635220E09 +++$+++ Wow, you really did make it first time! Congratulations to you and Rusty, it was a pleasure working with you both. -- +++$+++ :Wow, you really did make it first time! Congratulations to you and Rusty, it was a pleasure working with you both. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 18:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

274402 +++$+++ Superbeecat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-11 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.202737620E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah - thanks for deleting [[Another Story]]. The uploader originally uploaded 3 speediable articles, and one, [[Vendensetsu]] is still up there, I was hoping you could delete it out so I don't have to drag out a prod, and warrantless objections from the author again. Cheers! - +++$+++ Hi Sarah - thanks for deleting [[Another Story]]. The uploader originally uploaded 3 speediable articles, and one, [[Vendensetsu]] is still up there, I was hoping you could delete it out so I don't have to drag out a prod, and warrantless objections from the author again. Cheers! -[[User talk:Superbeecat|<font style="background:#000033;color:#33ffcc;">&nbsp;'''super'''</font><font style="background:#000033;color:#ccff33;">&beta;&epsilon;&epsilon;</font><font style="background:#000033;color:#ff9966;">''cat''&nbsp;</font>]] 05:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
274403 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274402 +++$+++ 274402 +++$+++ 2008-02-11 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.202738220E09 +++$+++ <after ec>Sure. I've deleted Vendensetsu. I noticed there was another in that set, Golem Relictus, that another admin has already deleted and they've closed the AFD. Thanks,  +++$+++ :<after ec>Sure. I've deleted Vendensetsu. I noticed there was another in that set, Golem Relictus, that another admin has already deleted and they've closed the AFD. Thanks, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
274404 +++$+++ Superbeecat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274402 +++$+++ 274402 +++$+++ 2008-02-11 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.202738040E09 +++$+++ Much appreciated, Cheers! - +++$+++ :Much appreciated, Cheers! -[[User talk:Superbeecat|<font style="background:#000033;color:#33ffcc;">&nbsp;'''super'''</font><font style="background:#000033;color:#ccff33;">&beta;&epsilon;&epsilon;</font><font style="background:#000033;color:#ff9966;">''cat''&nbsp;</font>]] 05:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
274405 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274402 +++$+++ 274404 +++$+++ 2008-02-11 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.202738220E09 +++$+++ No worries. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::No worries. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

12261 +++$+++ Tryptofish +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12261 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-25 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.240706940E09 +++$+++ Hi Bob! I just wanted to say a quick thank-you for your comment at [[Talk:Animal rights]]. I appreciate the positive feedback. (Based on your interest, I'd also appreciate any advice you might want to give at [[Talk:Animal Liberation Front#RfC: FBI quote|ALF]], if you feel like it.) Thanks again. -- +++$+++ Hi Bob! I just wanted to say a quick thank-you for your comment at [[Talk:Animal rights]]. I appreciate the positive feedback. (Based on your interest, I'd also appreciate any advice you might want to give at [[Talk:Animal Liberation Front#RfC: FBI quote|ALF]], if you feel like it.) Thanks again. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 17:49, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
12262 +++$+++ Tryptofish +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12261 +++$+++ 12261 +++$+++ 2009-04-25 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.240709640E09 +++$+++ Got your message at my talk and at ALF. Thanks again for the helpful advice, and of course I don't mind that you see it differently than I do. Your idea of putting the quote lower on the page is an interesting one, and might be worth a careful look by us all. Thanks again. -- +++$+++ :Got your message at my talk and at ALF. Thanks again for the helpful advice, and of course I don't mind that you see it differently than I do. Your idea of putting the quote lower on the page is an interesting one, and might be worth a careful look by us all. Thanks again. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 18:34, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

274406 +++$+++ Damuna +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274406 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-12 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.202815560E09 +++$+++ Hi there, I'm curious about the deletion of the [[Bastila Shan]] article. According to the page info, you're the deleting admin, so I figured you might know why it was deleted. It says it was [[WP:PROD|prodded]], but I don't feel the PROD was appropriate. Can you shed some light on this for me? Thanks. :) -- +++$+++ Hi there, I'm curious about the deletion of the [[Bastila Shan]] article. According to the page info, you're the deleting admin, so I figured you might know why it was deleted. It says it was [[WP:PROD|prodded]], but I don't feel the PROD was appropriate. Can you shed some light on this for me? Thanks. :) --[[User:Damuna|Muna]] ([[User talk:Damuna|talk]]) 03:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
274407 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274406 +++$+++ 274406 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.202816940E09 +++$+++ Hi Muna. The article was proded as a \"Fictional character which appears in only one computer game and is a footnote in the sequel. No reliable sources to establish independent notability, and very minor notability within the whole of the Star Wars Expanded universe.\" The prod was left uncontested for the full period (five days) and so it was deleted rather routinely. If you want to contest the prod now, I would be willing to restore it for you so you can contest it. If I do restore it, though, you should discuss the article with  +++$+++ :Hi Muna. The article was proded as a "Fictional character which appears in only one computer game and is a footnote in the sequel. No reliable sources to establish independent notability, and very minor notability within the whole of the Star Wars Expanded universe." The prod was left uncontested for the full period (five days) and so it was deleted rather routinely. If you want to contest the prod now, I would be willing to restore it for you so you can contest it. If I do restore it, though, you should discuss the article with [[User:Dorftrottel]] as s/he was the editor who proded it and see if there are problems that can be addressed editorially. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
274408 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274406 +++$+++ 274407 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.202980260E09 +++$+++ I've restored it for you but if you think it should be merged then you'll have to do that yourself. I'm not an editor of these articles and I'm not even interested in Star Wars games, I was just acting routinely as an administrator.  +++$+++ ::I've restored it for you but if you think it should be merged then you'll have to do that yourself. I'm not an editor of these articles and I'm not even interested in Star Wars games, I was just acting routinely as an administrator. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

482641 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482641 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-27 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.175046120E09 +++$+++ After being warned following your user page vandalization, the little imp continue on its merry way, as evidenced [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/209.31.114.106 here]. I reverted the first couple, but methinks it needs blockage? Yep, and he vandalized your userpage ''again.'' -- +++$+++ After being warned following your user page vandalization, the little imp continue on its merry way, as evidenced [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/209.31.114.106 here]. I reverted the first couple, but methinks it needs blockage? Yep, and he vandalized your userpage ''again.'' --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 18:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
482642 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482641 +++$+++ 482641 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.175046180E09 +++$+++ Never mind, [[User:KirinX|KirinX]] got it. :) -- +++$+++ :Never mind, [[User:KirinX|KirinX]] got it. :) --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 18:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
482643 +++$+++ KirinX +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482641 +++$+++ 482642 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.175046240E09 +++$+++ Indeed it looks like I beat you to the reverts themselves, but the vandal in question was reported to AIV by me and was subsequently blocked. --  +++$+++ ::Indeed it looks like I beat you to the reverts themselves, but the vandal in question was reported to AIV by me and was subsequently blocked. -- [[User:KirinX|KirinX]] 18:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
482644 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482641 +++$+++ 482643 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.175051640E09 +++$+++ Oh my, look at all the excitement I missed.  Thanks all!  Actually I read somewhere that it's not kosher for admins to block people who vandalize their user page but I usually block them anyway...  Thanks again.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::Oh my, look at all the excitement I missed.  Thanks all!  Actually I read somewhere that it's not kosher for admins to block people who vandalize their user page but I usually block them anyway...  Thanks again.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 20:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

536552 +++$+++ Siva1979 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-02 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.159842240E09 +++$+++ Hi! I hope you are feeling fine. I have noticed that your last [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/RandyWang|RfA]] was very close and I voiced out my opinion over your nomination as ''Neutral''. After some thoughts about this and considering the other strong positive factors regarding the editing you have been doing on this project, I was just wandering if you would accept a nomination for adminship sometime in November 2006? Why November? Well, your last RfA was on end of August 2006 and running for RfA again after less than two months is a bit too soon. So, to play it safe, I have decided to nominate you sometime next month. I feel that you truly deserve to be an admin and it was unfortunate that your nomination was not a success. Personally, I know exactly how you must be feeling as I have gone through three failed RfAs myself! The extra buttons which would be given to you would certainly benefit this project! --<font style=\"background:gold\">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">S<\/font>]] +++$+++ Hi! I hope you are feeling fine. I have noticed that your last [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RandyWang|RfA]] was very close and I voiced out my opinion over your nomination as ''Neutral''. After some thoughts about this and considering the other strong positive factors regarding the editing you have been doing on this project, I was just wandering if you would accept a nomination for adminship sometime in November 2006? Why November? Well, your last RfA was on end of August 2006 and running for RfA again after less than two months is a bit too soon. So, to play it safe, I have decided to nominate you sometime next month. I feel that you truly deserve to be an admin and it was unfortunate that your nomination was not a success. Personally, I know exactly how you must be feeling as I have gone through three failed RfAs myself! The extra buttons which would be given to you would certainly benefit this project! --<font style="background:gold">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">S</font>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">[[User talk:Siva1979|Talk to me]]</font></sup> 19:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
536553 +++$+++ Alex9891 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536552 +++$+++ 536552 +++$+++ 2006-10-02 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.159842780E09 +++$+++ I feel I must second Siva here. You are a great asset to this project, and one of the best users I have come across. I will definitely support you again. Thanks. -- +++$+++ :I feel I must second Siva here. You are a great asset to this project, and one of the best users I have come across. I will definitely support you again. Thanks. --[[User:Alex9891|Alex]] ([[User talk:Alex9891|Talk]]) 19:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
536554 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536552 +++$+++ 536553 +++$+++ 2006-10-02 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.159853160E09 +++$+++ Oh, wow. This is... unexpected. :) Thank you very much, both of you, but I'd prefer not to be nominated until perhaps December or January at the earliest. I won't have enough time to continue editing over the coming weeks because of my final school exams, so I'd be going into an RfA with over a month of relative inactivity. I'd prefer to just wait a little longer first. Thank you very, very much for your kind words, though. :) [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::Oh, wow. This is... unexpected. :) Thank you very much, both of you, but I'd prefer not to be nominated until perhaps December or January at the earliest. I won't have enough time to continue editing over the coming weeks because of my final school exams, so I'd be going into an RfA with over a month of relative inactivity. I'd prefer to just wait a little longer first. Thank you very, very much for your kind words, though. :) [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''patch''']]</sub></span>) 22:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

12266 +++$+++ EscapedApe +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-23 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.245826260E09 +++$+++ Hi Bob. I've posted a link to some papers and articles primarily written by our president Leif Cocks who is a leading authority on orangutan welfare. He's the head curator of exotic animals at Perth Zoo and very well known within academic circles. My link edit has since been undone and I don't believe that this is fair. I wasn't linking to the home page but directly to the page containing the articles. I can't contact Mr Ollie (http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:MrOllie) as when I attempt to \"talk\" to him there is no way for me to edit on his talk page.  +++$+++ Hi Bob. I've posted a link to some papers and articles primarily written by our president Leif Cocks who is a leading authority on orangutan welfare. He's the head curator of exotic animals at Perth Zoo and very well known within academic circles. My link edit has since been undone and I don't believe that this is fair. I wasn't linking to the home page but directly to the page containing the articles. I can't contact Mr Ollie (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MrOllie) as when I attempt to "talk" to him there is no way for me to edit on his talk page. [[User:EscapedApe|EscapedApe]] ([[User talk:EscapedApe|talk]]) 23:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
12267 +++$+++ EscapedApe +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12266 +++$+++ 12266 +++$+++ 2009-06-24 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.245834540E09 +++$+++ Hi Bob. Thanks for your continued help. Unfortunately when I go to MrOllie's talk page there is no \"new section\" option. The only tabs that appear are \"user page\" \"discussion\" \"view source\" \"history\" and \"watch\". Wow, I'm getting very confused by what is relevant and what is not. We offer more information about the orangutan than most sites (papers, projects - both welfare and habitat protection, images) - more than the \"GrungyApe\" external link (which I'm NOT suggesting should be removed) but because we also have other information about \"the cause\" it seems we're not a suitable link. I'm not trying to be argumentative, just curious!  +++$+++ : Hi Bob. Thanks for your continued help. Unfortunately when I go to MrOllie's talk page there is no "new section" option. The only tabs that appear are "user page" "discussion" "view source" "history" and "watch". Wow, I'm getting very confused by what is relevant and what is not. We offer more information about the orangutan than most sites (papers, projects - both welfare and habitat protection, images) - more than the "GrungyApe" external link (which I'm NOT suggesting should be removed) but because we also have other information about "the cause" it seems we're not a suitable link. I'm not trying to be argumentative, just curious! [[User:EscapedApe|EscapedApe]] ([[User talk:EscapedApe|talk]]) 02:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

585254 +++$+++ J.delanoy +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.206663300E09 +++$+++ Can you look at [[WP:RPP]] and deal with my request? I am getting really annoyed.  +++$+++ Can you look at [[WP:RPP]] and deal with my request? I am getting really annoyed. [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="#ffe800">J.d</font><font color="#00ff00">ela</font><font color="green">noy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<sub><font color="blue">adds</font></sub>]] 17:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
585255 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585254 +++$+++ 585254 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.206663540E09 +++$+++ {{RFPP|bloc}} for the user 24 hours: no need for protection at this point. Looking at the IP's edits, they were being disruptive.  +++$+++ *{{RFPP|bloc}} for the user 24 hours: no need for protection at this point. Looking at the IP's edits, they were being disruptive. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
585256 +++$+++ J.delanoy +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585254 +++$+++ 585255 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.206663660E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I wasn't sure if I should report him to AIV, so I went that route.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. I wasn't sure if I should report him to AIV, so I went that route. [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="#ffe800">J.d</font><font color="#00ff00">ela</font><font color="green">noy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<sub><font color="blue">adds</font></sub>]] 17:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
585257 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585254 +++$+++ 585256 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.206663780E09 +++$+++ That's fine: I don't think there would have been a problem reporting him to AIV, in all fairness: the edits he made before editing your talk page were vandalism, so it's clear he was simply here to be disruptive.  +++$+++ :::That's fine: I don't think there would have been a problem reporting him to AIV, in all fairness: the edits he made before editing your talk page were vandalism, so it's clear he was simply here to be disruptive. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

536557 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536557 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-11 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.160594520E09 +++$+++ Been seeing you around again &ndash; especially your activity on MD's RfB... go you good thing, stick to your convictions :) Hope you've been well and the exams aren't stressing you out ''too'' much &ndash; I'd tell you they're not ''that'' bad, but I wouldn't have believed myself this time last year either. &mdash; ''' +++$+++ Been seeing you around again &ndash; especially your activity on MD's RfB... go you good thing, stick to your convictions :) Hope you've been well and the exams aren't stressing you out ''too'' much &ndash; I'd tell you they're not ''that'' bad, but I wouldn't have believed myself this time last year either. &mdash; '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana_dzasta]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:Riana_dzasta|wreak havoc]]'''-'''[[Special:Contributions/Riana_dzasta|damage report]] </sub> 12:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
536558 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536557 +++$+++ 536557 +++$+++ 2006-10-11 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.160595120E09 +++$+++ Ah, sometimes this Wikithing is ''hard''. :p Oh well, I've rambled enough now. Take care, &mdash; ''' +++$+++ :Ah, sometimes this Wikithing is ''hard''. :p Oh well, I've rambled enough now. Take care, &mdash; '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana_dzasta]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:Riana_dzasta|wreak havoc]]'''-'''[[Special:Contributions/Riana_dzasta|damage report]] </sub> 12:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
536559 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536557 +++$+++ 536558 +++$+++ 2006-10-11 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.160600880E09 +++$+++ I really shouldn't stay up any longer, but I'll probably hang around and do some RCP. Ciao dude, take care! And thanks for the help. &mdash; ''' +++$+++ ::I really shouldn't stay up any longer, but I'll probably hang around and do some RCP. Ciao dude, take care! And thanks for the help. &mdash; '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana_dzasta]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:Riana_dzasta|wreak havoc]]'''-'''[[Special:Contributions/Riana_dzasta|damage report]] </sub> 14:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
536560 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536557 +++$+++ 536559 +++$+++ 2006-10-11 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.160601360E09 +++$+++ rofl! That reminds me of a terrible joke I once heard about a truck driver running into a [[policeman|pig]], but I'll tell you that one later :p By the way, just reread your last message... [[Gollum|sneaking]]? Cut me deep, man. Have a good night! &mdash; ''' +++$+++ :::rofl! That reminds me of a terrible joke I once heard about a truck driver running into a [[policeman|pig]], but I'll tell you that one later :p By the way, just reread your last message... [[Gollum|sneaking]]? Cut me deep, man. Have a good night! &mdash; '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana_dzasta]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:Riana_dzasta|wreak havoc]]'''-'''[[Special:Contributions/Riana_dzasta|damage report]] </sub> 14:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

12270 +++$+++ Tryptofish +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-05 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.252202640E09 +++$+++ Bob, I take very strong exception to your comment directed at me at talk:animal rights. I feel that it is extremely unfair to characterize me in the way that you did. It is simply not accurate. -- +++$+++ Bob, I take very strong exception to your comment directed at me at talk:animal rights. I feel that it is extremely unfair to characterize me in the way that you did. It is simply not accurate. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 19:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
12271 +++$+++ Tryptofish +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12270 +++$+++ 12270 +++$+++ 2009-09-05 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.252215480E09 +++$+++ I got your reply at my talk. Thank you very much for that. I feel much better to hear that, and I appreciate your good intentions. No hard feelings. Best, -- +++$+++ :I got your reply at my talk. Thank you very much for that. I feel much better to hear that, and I appreciate your good intentions. No hard feelings. Best, --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 22:38, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

274416 +++$+++ Ned Scott +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274416 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.202917440E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, I sure as hell take offense to the accusation of trolling. Call it what you want, but I re-added him because it was within his right, not because I cared about anyone's reaction to it. --  +++$+++ Just to let you know, I sure as hell take offense to the accusation of trolling. Call it what you want, but I re-added him because it was within his right, not because I cared about anyone's reaction to it. -- [[User:Ned Scott|Ned Scott]] 07:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
274417 +++$+++ Ned Scott +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274416 +++$+++ 274416 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.202917740E09 +++$+++ sorry.. a little on edge. I still don't consider it trolling, but I don't actually take that much of an offense to it. I'll probably forget about it in a minute or two. I shouldn't snap at you. --  +++$+++ :sorry.. a little on edge. I still don't consider it trolling, but I don't actually take that much of an offense to it. I'll probably forget about it in a minute or two. I shouldn't snap at you. -- [[User:Ned Scott|Ned Scott]] 07:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
274418 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274416 +++$+++ 274417 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 08:11:00 +++$+++ 1.202919060E09 +++$+++ No problems, I understand. I didn't mean to upset you and \"trolling\" wasn't really the right word, so I'm sorry, too. It just seemed like you were being pointy, but you say you weren't, so I can accept. No hard feelings.  +++$+++ ::No problems, I understand. I didn't mean to upset you and "trolling" wasn't really the right word, so I'm sorry, too. It just seemed like you were being pointy, but you say you weren't, so I can accept. No hard feelings. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

45736 +++$+++ NimaFallah +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310698800E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Thank You  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank You [[User:NimaFallah|NimaFallah]] ([[User talk:NimaFallah|talk]]) 20:00, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
45737 +++$+++ Joyson Noel  +++$+++ Joyson Noel +++$+++ 45736 +++$+++ 45736 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.310699340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the barnstar!  +++$+++ : Thanks for the barnstar! [[User:Joyson Noel |<big><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000">Joyson Noel</FONT></big>]][[User talk:Joyson Noel |<small><sup><FONT FACE="Haettenschweiler" COLOR="#ff0000"> Holla at me!</FONT></sup></small>]] 20:09, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

274420 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.202930160E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah - have come across an interesting one and your views will be much appreciated. I have just blocked [[user:Gaogier]] for using multiple accounts - and detailed that action on his talk page.  However his user page concerns me because he has in fact adjusted it in such a way as to make it very difficult to observe diffs or to edit his page (an overlay template removes any possibility of finding the edit and other tabs - well at least it does for me and I am using Firefox).  My view is that user pages should not impede the normal ability for other users to edit - for example - if it becomes necessary to indicate that he is a sock puppeteer.  '''[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User%3AGaogier&diff=190771881&oldid=190474047 This is the diff]''' just before he has changed it to become inoperable.  I give you this dif because if you go to the next diff after this one you will see the problem. Of course it could just be a browser issue but any feedback would be helpful.-- +++$+++ Hi Sarah - have come across an interesting one and your views will be much appreciated. I have just blocked [[user:Gaogier]] for using multiple accounts - and detailed that action on his talk page.  However his user page concerns me because he has in fact adjusted it in such a way as to make it very difficult to observe diffs or to edit his page (an overlay template removes any possibility of finding the edit and other tabs - well at least it does for me and I am using Firefox).  My view is that user pages should not impede the normal ability for other users to edit - for example - if it becomes necessary to indicate that he is a sock puppeteer.  '''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AGaogier&diff=190771881&oldid=190474047 This is the diff]''' just before he has changed it to become inoperable.  I give you this dif because if you go to the next diff after this one you will see the problem. Of course it could just be a browser issue but any feedback would be helpful.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 11:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
274421 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274420 +++$+++ 274420 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.202932320E09 +++$+++ Am investigating right now, Steve.:)  +++$+++ :Am investigating right now, Steve.:) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
274422 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274420 +++$+++ 274421 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.202933160E09 +++$+++ Cheers Sarah - thank you (should still be up for a while) :)-- +++$+++ ::Cheers Sarah - thank you (should still be up for a while) :)--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 12:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
274423 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274420 +++$+++ 274422 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.202933520E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the delay, I was just double-checking with another browser. I use Firefox, too, but I checked it in IE as well and with IE it removes the my talk, my prefs, watchlist etc but I could still see edit, history, etc. With Firefox it removed all the links. So I just reverted the page. Is it likely the account will be unblocked? I've never seen that before but it's obviously going to be problematic for other editors navigating so best to just remove it.  +++$+++ :::Sorry for the delay, I was just double-checking with another browser. I use Firefox, too, but I checked it in IE as well and with IE it removes the my talk, my prefs, watchlist etc but I could still see edit, history, etc. With Firefox it removed all the links. So I just reverted the page. Is it likely the account will be unblocked? I've never seen that before but it's obviously going to be problematic for other editors navigating so best to just remove it. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
274424 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274420 +++$+++ 274423 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.202933820E09 +++$+++ Delay no issue.  Thanks for looking - I thought it was very problematic also but wanted a second opinion.  Not sure if the account is going to be unblocked - we'll see if he makes a request.  He is an interesting editor seems to have done good work also but (unless I am totally mistaken) turns to other IP's to be mischievous and vandalising when it suits. I guess time will tell and then what other admins think upon an unblock request. I spent a lot of time going through all of his pages and finding clear cases where he gives himself away.  Thank you again.-- +++$+++ ::::Delay no issue.  Thanks for looking - I thought it was very problematic also but wanted a second opinion.  Not sure if the account is going to be unblocked - we'll see if he makes a request.  He is an interesting editor seems to have done good work also but (unless I am totally mistaken) turns to other IP's to be mischievous and vandalising when it suits. I guess time will tell and then what other admins think upon an unblock request. I spent a lot of time going through all of his pages and finding clear cases where he gives himself away.  Thank you again.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 12:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
274425 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274420 +++$+++ 274424 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.202934360E09 +++$+++ Ugh, there's actually a bunch of subpages in his userspace that are like that too.  +++$+++ :::::Ugh, there's actually a bunch of subpages in his userspace that are like that too. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
274426 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274420 +++$+++ 274425 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.202934780E09 +++$+++ Yep I know - but it was going through these that I determined that he used IP's to edit his own pages and they were the later used in the main space for other disruption.  As I said and interesting but concerning editor.-- +++$+++ ::::::Yep I know - but it was going through these that I determined that he used IP's to edit his own pages and they were the later used in the main space for other disruption.  As I said and interesting but concerning editor.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 12:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

12277 +++$+++ BlueMoon1969 +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12277 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-29 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.256850240E09 +++$+++ Thanks +++$+++ Thanks[[User:BlueMoon1969|BlueMoon1969]] ([[User talk:BlueMoon1969|talk]]) 14:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
12278 +++$+++ 71.245.164.83 +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12277 +++$+++ 12277 +++$+++ 2011-02-25 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.298630400E09 +++$+++ Hey man, its long past Monday.  What did you do?--[[Special:Contributions\/71.245.164.83|71.245.164.83]] ( +++$+++ : Hey man, its long past Monday.  What did you do?--[[Special:Contributions/71.245.164.83|71.245.164.83]] ([[User talk:71.245.164.83|talk]]) 02:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

536570 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536570 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-25 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.161811080E09 +++$+++ Hello, chappy! First of all, what on ''Earth'' are you doing here? :) Secondly, I checked out the second episode, and enjoyed it so much, I dl-ed the first ep, too <small>and in high quality! Lordy.<\/small> It was great overall, but I agree with [[User:Zero1328|Zero1328]]'s comment in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly#Feedback|feedback]] section. I think you guys need to think about who you're aiming the podcast at - is it just Wikipedians? If so, is it established Wikipedians, or people who want to learn more about the project? Or is it non-Wikipedians who want to know more about it? Put it this way: I didn't know who Jimbo was 'til about a month into editing :) And I'm sure I'm not the only one out there (although I ''am'' a little slower than average). <br>I'll put this on the project talk page, but I just thought I'd let you know here, as well. <br>Heard your sexy voice, too *swoon* :p Too bad about the bastardry, though, hope it works out better next time. <br>Hope the exams are going well, etc, etc... <br>Take care, '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:Riana dzasta|dzast]] +++$+++ Hello, chappy! First of all, what on ''Earth'' are you doing here? :) Secondly, I checked out the second episode, and enjoyed it so much, I dl-ed the first ep, too <small>and in high quality! Lordy.</small> It was great overall, but I agree with [[User:Zero1328|Zero1328]]'s comment in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly#Feedback|feedback]] section. I think you guys need to think about who you're aiming the podcast at - is it just Wikipedians? If so, is it established Wikipedians, or people who want to learn more about the project? Or is it non-Wikipedians who want to know more about it? Put it this way: I didn't know who Jimbo was 'til about a month into editing :) And I'm sure I'm not the only one out there (although I ''am'' a little slower than average). <br>I'll put this on the project talk page, but I just thought I'd let you know here, as well. <br>Heard your sexy voice, too *swoon* :p Too bad about the bastardry, though, hope it works out better next time. <br>Hope the exams are going well, etc, etc... <br>Take care, '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:Riana dzasta|dzast]][[User:Riana_dzasta/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]]''' 14:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
536571 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536570 +++$+++ 536570 +++$+++ 2006-10-30 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.162220880E09 +++$+++ Take care, '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:Riana dzasta|dzast]] +++$+++ :Take care, '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:Riana dzasta|dzast]][[User:Riana_dzasta/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]]''' 07:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

274427 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.202934900E09 +++$+++ [outdented for readability] Sorry Sarah - (just looked at your contribs) didn't mean to labour you with more work. :( -- +++$+++ [outdented for readability] Sorry Sarah - (just looked at your contribs) didn't mean to labour you with more work. :( --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 12:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
274428 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274427 +++$+++ 274427 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.202935320E09 +++$+++ No worries, Steve. You've helped me out plenty of times so it's only fair. :) Anyway, I couldn't work out what was causing that flag to do that so I just went through all his userpages and reverted the pages that had it on. If he gets unblocked he'll have to figure the edits out himself but he can't have the flag like that. I also found two articles that look like they were moved from the userspace because of notability or something and he hasn't edited them for months so they probably need to be deleted or moved into userspace. But I guess they can wait until we see what happens with his account.  +++$+++ :No worries, Steve. You've helped me out plenty of times so it's only fair. :) Anyway, I couldn't work out what was causing that flag to do that so I just went through all his userpages and reverted the pages that had it on. If he gets unblocked he'll have to figure the edits out himself but he can't have the flag like that. I also found two articles that look like they were moved from the userspace because of notability or something and he hasn't edited them for months so they probably need to be deleted or moved into userspace. But I guess they can wait until we see what happens with his account. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
274429 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274427 +++$+++ 274428 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.202935500E09 +++$+++ '''PS''' Nice to see the glittering tag team diplomatic approach between us to another page today.-- +++$+++ :*'''PS''' Nice to see the glittering tag team diplomatic approach between us to another page today.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 12:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

536572 +++$+++ Walkerma +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536572 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-30 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.162210980E09 +++$+++ Let me know if you want me or others to participate (I can email Maurreen if needed), and also can you give me the date and UTC time?  Thanks,  +++$+++ Let me know if you want me or others to participate (I can email Maurreen if needed), and also can you give me the date and UTC time?  Thanks, [[User:Walkerma|Walkerma]] 04:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
536573 +++$+++ Walkerma +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536572 +++$+++ 536572 +++$+++ 2006-10-30 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.162213020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the prompt reply, I wanted to give you a list in case you had trouble getting people to contribute, and also I saw the \"up to ten\" mentioned on the page - maybe I got carried away!  If you are limited to 4-5, IMHO the top priority would be to get someone from the Polish release such as [[User:Polimerek]] or [[User:Kpjas]], as they also have a release coming out very soon. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks for the prompt reply, I wanted to give you a list in case you had trouble getting people to contribute, and also I saw the "up to ten" mentioned on the page - maybe I got carried away!  If you are limited to 4-5, IMHO the top priority would be to get someone from the Polish release such as [[User:Polimerek]] or [[User:Kpjas]], as they also have a release coming out very soon. Cheers, [[User:Walkerma|Walkerma]] 04:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
536574 +++$+++ Walkerma +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536572 +++$+++ 536573 +++$+++ 2006-10-30 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.162214580E09 +++$+++ I'll email Polimerek and find out.  The Polish group were expecting to finish their article selection of ~250,000 this week, and go to press shortly afterwards.  The English Version 0.5 is still 1-2 weeks away from finishing its selection of ~2000, but unlike the Poles we don't have the publisher lined up ready yet - but at least we can release it for download soon and make it available via PediaPress.  And [[User:BozMo]] is releasing his next charity version (~5000 articles) in the next month or two, I think.   +++$+++ ::I'll email Polimerek and find out.  The Polish group were expecting to finish their article selection of ~250,000 this week, and go to press shortly afterwards.  The English Version 0.5 is still 1-2 weeks away from finishing its selection of ~2000, but unlike the Poles we don't have the publisher lined up ready yet - but at least we can release it for download soon and make it available via PediaPress.  And [[User:BozMo]] is releasing his next charity version (~5000 articles) in the next month or two, I think.  [[User:Walkerma|Walkerma]] 05:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

274430 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-14 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.202994660E09 +++$+++ Looks like we have an answer to our earlier question.  Thank you for adjusting tag. -- +++$+++ Looks like we have an answer to our earlier question.  Thank you for adjusting tag. --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 05:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
274431 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274430 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.203009300E09 +++$+++ No worries, Steve. I just noticed that he has this [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Microsoft]] and he's the only member of it so I'm not sure what we should do with it. I guess wait and see if anyone else decides to take over it and if not eventually MfD it. I've watchlisted all the pages for both his projects as he seems to care a lot about them and may continue to try using IPs to edit them. Cheers Steve,  +++$+++ :::No worries, Steve. I just noticed that he has this [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Microsoft]] and he's the only member of it so I'm not sure what we should do with it. I guess wait and see if anyone else decides to take over it and if not eventually MfD it. I've watchlisted all the pages for both his projects as he seems to care a lot about them and may continue to try using IPs to edit them. Cheers Steve, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
274432 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274430 +++$+++ 274430 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.202981220E09 +++$+++ Hey, Elfoid. I do appreciate the comment; thanks. If there's anymore personal attacks like the one I commented about on Paaerduag's page, come and let me know straight away. The problem is that blocks are meant to be used preventatively, to prevent disruption, not punitively, and when you wait days\/weeks to report it, it becomes very difficult to sanction. Just make sure that you report that sort of stuff straight away. But hopefully now you've raised it and Paaerduag has apologised things will settle down and you guys will be able to work together. Thanks again for your message,  +++$+++ :Hey, Elfoid. I do appreciate the comment; thanks. If there's anymore personal attacks like the one I commented about on Paaerduag's page, come and let me know straight away. The problem is that blocks are meant to be used preventatively, to prevent disruption, not punitively, and when you wait days/weeks to report it, it becomes very difficult to sanction. Just make sure that you report that sort of stuff straight away. But hopefully now you've raised it and Paaerduag has apologised things will settle down and you guys will be able to work together. Thanks again for your message, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

552862 +++$+++ Haukurth +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 552862 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-05 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.173136560E09 +++$+++ Glad you're back. While you were gone we basically lost the semi-protection fight. Hundreds of pages are now semi-protected semi-permanently and semi-invisibly. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere\/Template:Sprotected2&limit=500&from=0]  +++$+++ Glad you're back. While you were gone we basically lost the semi-protection fight. Hundreds of pages are now semi-protected semi-permanently and semi-invisibly. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Sprotected2&limit=500&from=0] [[User:Haukurth|Haukur]] 15:16, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
552863 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 552862 +++$+++ 552862 +++$+++ 2007-03-05 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.173144000E09 +++$+++ I wonder if we might look at some sort of rational, apolitical, but firm method for scrutinising the surviving protections as a matter of course rather than coincidence. I wonder what scope, and support, there is for some sort of WikiProject Protection to seek some body of people who'll offer to look at a few every day when they can, and maybe set 24 hour expiries on those they think should be released or something. Or perhaps that would just result in 24 hour trials-by-fire.  +++$+++ :I wonder if we might look at some sort of rational, apolitical, but firm method for scrutinising the surviving protections as a matter of course rather than coincidence. I wonder what scope, and support, there is for some sort of WikiProject Protection to seek some body of people who'll offer to look at a few every day when they can, and maybe set 24 hour expiries on those they think should be released or something. Or perhaps that would just result in 24 hour trials-by-fire. [[User:Splash|Splash]] - [[User talk:Splash|tk]] 17:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
552864 +++$+++ Haukurth +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 552862 +++$+++ 552863 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.173244260E09 +++$+++ Quite true, the expiring feature is a positive step. I hope we can foster a culture where (semi)-protections with indefinite expiration are the exception and not the rule. And changing an indefinite protection to a time-limited one is a nice soft way of getting rid of protection with less risk of offending the admin who applied it. I hadn't thought of that.  +++$+++ ::Quite true, the expiring feature is a positive step. I hope we can foster a culture where (semi)-protections with indefinite expiration are the exception and not the rule. And changing an indefinite protection to a time-limited one is a nice soft way of getting rid of protection with less risk of offending the admin who applied it. I hadn't thought of that. [[User:Haukurth|Haukur]] 21:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

274433 +++$+++ Nwwaew +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274433 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-14 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.202983620E09 +++$+++ You've got mail. <font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ You've got mail. <font face="Trebuchet MS">[[User:Nwwaew|Nwwaew]]<small> ([[User_Talk:Nwwaew|Talk Page]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Nwwaew|Contribs]]) ([[Special:Emailuser/Nwwaew|E-mail me]])</small></font> 02:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
274434 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274433 +++$+++ 274433 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.202984820E09 +++$+++ As do you. :)  +++$+++ :As do you. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

12290 +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12290 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-03 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.267654680E09 +++$+++ In the [[Your Mommy Kills Animals (film)]]article, editor Gooma2 continues to reinsert copyrighted material and does not respond to a request to discuss this. Thanks for help.  +++$+++ In the [[Your Mommy Kills Animals (film)]]article, editor Gooma2 continues to reinsert copyrighted material and does not respond to a request to discuss this. Thanks for help. [[User:Bob98133|Bob98133]] ([[User talk:Bob98133#top|talk]]) 14:18, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
12291 +++$+++ Mysdaao +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12290 +++$+++ 12290 +++$+++ 2010-03-03 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.267657200E09 +++$+++ Not all users read the talk pages of articles they edit.  The best way to send a message to a user is to post on the user's talk page.  Write a message on [[User talk:Gooma2]].  If you want to use a standard warning for copyright violations, add {{tlp|uw-copyright}} by following the instructions on the template page.  Please let me know if there are any more questions.  Thanks!  -- +++$+++ :Not all users read the talk pages of articles they edit.  The best way to send a message to a user is to post on the user's talk page.  Write a message on [[User talk:Gooma2]].  If you want to use a standard warning for copyright violations, add {{tlp|uw-copyright}} by following the instructions on the template page.  Please let me know if there are any more questions.  Thanks!  --[[User:Mysdaao|Mysdaao]] <sup>[[User talk:Mysdaao|talk]]</sup> 15:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

274435 +++$+++ Pairadox +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274435 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-14 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.202988060E09 +++$+++ I think it might be time for an RFC on a certain self-proclaimed Scholar from New York. If you were to start one, I'm sure at least two others would be willing to certify it. The tendency to obsfucate and not accept responsibility for his\/her actions is frustrating to many people.  +++$+++ I think it might be time for an RFC on a certain self-proclaimed Scholar from New York. If you were to start one, I'm sure at least two others would be willing to certify it. The tendency to obsfucate and not accept responsibility for his/her actions is frustrating to many people. [[User:Pairadox|Pairadox]] ([[User talk:Pairadox|talk]]) 03:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
274436 +++$+++ Veritas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274435 +++$+++ 274435 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.202994840E09 +++$+++ That's subtle ;).  I've been watching the goings-on though and agree. -- +++$+++ :That's subtle ;).  I've been watching the goings-on though and agree. --[[User:Veritas|Veritas]] ([[User talk:Veritas|talk]]) 05:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
274437 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274435 +++$+++ 274436 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.202996100E09 +++$+++ Heh, yeah, I'm not interested in writing an RfC myself but Pairadox, if you want to start one, go for it. I'd probably make a comment on it if you did write one, but I'm too busy with other things and I've spent way too much time on that issue as it is. Sorry mate,  +++$+++ ::Heh, yeah, I'm not interested in writing an RfC myself but Pairadox, if you want to start one, go for it. I'd probably make a comment on it if you did write one, but I'm too busy with other things and I've spent way too much time on that issue as it is. Sorry mate, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

274438 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.203159540E09 +++$+++ Your reaction to that thread is puzzling.  I relayed a blind request in a neutral manner and was surprised to see a response from you that basically calls me a dupe.  When I post politely to say I wasn't duped, you make a long follow-up stating you're straining to assume good faith about several things that I never posted in the context of that thread.  You're inferring negative elements that simply aren't in my words.  The impression that gives is not one of good faith but of prejudice and hostility.  I hope this is simple crossed wires. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Your reaction to that thread is puzzling.  I relayed a blind request in a neutral manner and was surprised to see a response from you that basically calls me a dupe.  When I post politely to say I wasn't duped, you make a long follow-up stating you're straining to assume good faith about several things that I never posted in the context of that thread.  You're inferring negative elements that simply aren't in my words.  The impression that gives is not one of good faith but of prejudice and hostility.  I hope this is simple crossed wires. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 02:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
274439 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274438 +++$+++ 274438 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.203161400E09 +++$+++ I didn't say I was straining to AGF. I was, however, trying to give you the benefit of the doubt and hoping that you were manipulated and\/or not fully aware of the facts surrounding that person because otherwise I have to question your judgement in being prepared to post messages from a person who has just been banned with those sorts of comments from the CUs and then forwarding emails on their behalf. You might not be supporting their unblock yourself but your willingness to do this does reflect on you. Surely it would be better to tell such users who have just been banned and shown no practical willingness or ability to abide by our policies to send their own emails to people they want to email and to follow WP:BLOCK and WP:BAN for appeals.  +++$+++ :I didn't say I was straining to AGF. I was, however, trying to give you the benefit of the doubt and hoping that you were manipulated and/or not fully aware of the facts surrounding that person because otherwise I have to question your judgement in being prepared to post messages from a person who has just been banned with those sorts of comments from the CUs and then forwarding emails on their behalf. You might not be supporting their unblock yourself but your willingness to do this does reflect on you. Surely it would be better to tell such users who have just been banned and shown no practical willingness or ability to abide by our policies to send their own emails to people they want to email and to follow WP:BLOCK and WP:BAN for appeals. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
274440 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274438 +++$+++ 274439 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.203166260E09 +++$+++ Well frankly I'd had nothing to do with the case and the Willy on Wheels business was before my time anyway.  It was a little surprising to get that message and I expected either a swift \"gaming the system\" response or a careful weighing of the merits of forgiving an old vandal, without explicit doubts about my judgement.  It's simply quicker and more productive to post the darn thing spend quality time restoring an 1873 albumen print for [[WP:FAC]]. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Well frankly I'd had nothing to do with the case and the Willy on Wheels business was before my time anyway.  It was a little surprising to get that message and I expected either a swift "gaming the system" response or a careful weighing of the merits of forgiving an old vandal, without explicit doubts about my judgement.  It's simply quicker and more productive to post the darn thing spend quality time restoring an 1873 albumen print for [[WP:FAC]]. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 04:51, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

12295 +++$+++ MirelesJ +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-16 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.271421000E09 +++$+++ When you have time would you take a look at the [[Talk:Alec_Baldwin#SNL_Appearance_with_Sarah_Palin_.28Political_Views.29|Alec Baldwin talk page]] and review a dispute I am having on a contribution? You have contributed to the page in the past two years and I would like you to look over the contribution and give your thoughts on it. Regards,  +++$+++ When you have time would you take a look at the [[Talk:Alec_Baldwin#SNL_Appearance_with_Sarah_Palin_.28Political_Views.29|Alec Baldwin talk page]] and review a dispute I am having on a contribution? You have contributed to the page in the past two years and I would like you to look over the contribution and give your thoughts on it. Regards, [[User:MirelesJ|MirelesJ]] ([[User talk:MirelesJ|talk]]) 05:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
12296 +++$+++ 71.245.164.83 +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12295 +++$+++ 12295 +++$+++ 2011-02-25 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.298629980E09 +++$+++ I also have complained about the same page.   His Political Views are not within WikiPedia rules or guidelines.  Someone with high priviliges is protecting his content on both the main page and discussion page.--[[Special:Contributions\/71.245.164.83|71.245.164.83]] ( +++$+++ : I also have complained about the same page.   His Political Views are not within WikiPedia rules or guidelines.  Someone with high priviliges is protecting his content on both the main page and discussion page.--[[Special:Contributions/71.245.164.83|71.245.164.83]] ([[User talk:71.245.164.83|talk]]) 02:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

536584 +++$+++ The Transhumanist +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536584 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-03 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.162577040E09 +++$+++ You mentioned an \"add section button at the top of the page\".  I'm aware of no such button.  Could you somehow point it out to me?  &nbsp; '''''  +++$+++ You mentioned an "add section button at the top of the page".  I'm aware of no such button.  Could you somehow point it out to me?  &nbsp; ''''' [[User:The Transhumanist| <font color="purple">Th</font><font color="blue">e Tr</font><font color="#9acd32">ans</font><font color="#FFCC00">hu</font><font color="orange">man</font><font color="red">ist</font> &nbsp; ]] ''''' 10:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
536585 +++$+++ The Transhumanist +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536584 +++$+++ 536584 +++$+++ 2006-11-03 10:18:00 +++$+++ 1.162577880E09 +++$+++ Found it.  It's the plus up there.  I never tried it til now.  Guess I need to look for that \"fix\" you were talking about.  &nbsp; '''''  +++$+++ : Found it.  It's the plus up there.  I never tried it til now.  Guess I need to look for that "fix" you were talking about.  &nbsp; ''''' [[User:The Transhumanist| <font color="purple">Th</font><font color="blue">e Tr</font><font color="#9acd32">ans</font><font color="#FFCC00">hu</font><font color="orange">man</font><font color="red">ist</font> &nbsp; ]] ''''' 10:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

274441 +++$+++ Danngarcia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-19 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.203466560E09 +++$+++ You might check out this user, he created another sockpuppet ([[Special:Contributions\/Jollibee Happy|User:Jollibee Happy]]). - +++$+++ You might check out this user, he created another sockpuppet ([[Special:Contributions/Jollibee Happy|User:Jollibee Happy]]). -[[User:Danngarcia|Danngarcia]] ([[User talk:Danngarcia|talk]]) 16:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
274442 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274441 +++$+++ 274441 +++$+++ 2008-02-19 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.203492900E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for letting me know. I've blocked that sock and I've added the film he's fixating on to protected titles so it can't be recreated. I'll have to remove it eventually but I should be able to keep it there for a couple of weeks. I've also started the category [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gerald Gonzalez\u200e]].  Please let me know if you notice anymore socks. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thank you very much for letting me know. I've blocked that sock and I've added the film he's fixating on to protected titles so it can't be recreated. I'll have to remove it eventually but I should be able to keep it there for a couple of weeks. I've also started the category [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gerald Gonzalez‎]].  Please let me know if you notice anymore socks. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 23:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
274443 +++$+++ Danngarcia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274441 +++$+++ 274441 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.203985980E09 +++$+++ This may be another sockpuppet of Gerald Gonzalez: [[Special:Contributions\/Jennyandalizapurok4|User:Jennyandalizapurok4]]. S\/he may be creating new articles but edits them the same way as the sockpuppets of Gonzalez. I will also keep on eye of this user. - +++$+++ :This may be another sockpuppet of Gerald Gonzalez: [[Special:Contributions/Jennyandalizapurok4|User:Jennyandalizapurok4]]. S/he may be creating new articles but edits them the same way as the sockpuppets of Gonzalez. I will also keep on eye of this user. -[[User:Danngarcia|Danngarcia]] ([[User talk:Danngarcia|talk]]) 16:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
274444 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274441 +++$+++ 274443 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.204040040E09 +++$+++ Thanks Dan. I agree that does look like Gerald. *sigh* I'll keep an eye on the account but let me know if you become more certain. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Thanks Dan. I agree that does look like Gerald. *sigh* I'll keep an eye on the account but let me know if you become more certain. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

12298 +++$+++ Themfromspace +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12298 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-23 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.272017940E09 +++$+++ Hi, we seem to have a disagreement in our interpretation of this guideline with respect to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Center_for_Consumer_Freedom&action=historysubmit&diff=357711125&oldid=357676545 this edit].  Can you explain how these websites meet [[WP:ELOFFICIAL]], especially the section about minimizing external links? Keep in mind that we generally only link to one or two \"official\" websites in our external links, and not every website that the article's subject is in control of. Thanks, ''' +++$+++ Hi, we seem to have a disagreement in our interpretation of this guideline with respect to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Center_for_Consumer_Freedom&action=historysubmit&diff=357711125&oldid=357676545 this edit].  Can you explain how these websites meet [[WP:ELOFFICIAL]], especially the section about minimizing external links? Keep in mind that we generally only link to one or two "official" websites in our external links, and not every website that the article's subject is in control of. Thanks, '''[[User:Themfromspace|<font color="blue">Them</font>]][[User talk:Themfromspace|<font color="red">From</font>]][[Special:Contributions/themfromspace|<font color="black">Space</font>]]''' 03:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
12299 +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ Bob98133 +++$+++ 12298 +++$+++ 12298 +++$+++ 2010-05-31 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.275355860E09 +++$+++ Hi, Joe - I've moved this talk to [[Talk:GW_Exotic_Animal_Foundation#Conflict_of_interest]]  +++$+++ :Hi, Joe - I've moved this talk to [[Talk:GW_Exotic_Animal_Foundation#Conflict_of_interest]] [[User:Bob98133|Bob98133]] ([[User talk:Bob98133#top|talk]]) 18:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

274445 +++$+++ Horologium +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-20 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.203547200E09 +++$+++ Why did you remove the \"subject has edited this page\" tag that I added to the talk page for this article? Isn't it appropriate to note such CoI issues? If he had not tinkered with his own article, I would have left the tag off, but autobiographical issues should be highlighted. ''' +++$+++ Why did you remove the "subject has edited this page" tag that I added to the talk page for this article? Isn't it appropriate to note such CoI issues? If he had not tinkered with his own article, I would have left the tag off, but autobiographical issues should be highlighted. '''[[User:Horologium|<font color="DarkSlateGray">Horologium</font>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Horologium|(talk)]]</small> 14:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
274446 +++$+++ Gnangarra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274445 +++$+++ 274445 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.203547380E09 +++$+++ Until such time as its confirmed that he's actually the same person to imply that the subject is editing the article has the potential to do more harm  +++$+++ :Until such time as its confirmed that he's actually the same person to imply that the subject is editing the article has the potential to do more harm [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 14:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
274447 +++$+++ Horologium +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274445 +++$+++ 274446 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.203547500E09 +++$+++ Ah, got it. Thank you, Gnangarra. ''' +++$+++ ::Ah, got it. Thank you, Gnangarra. '''[[User:Horologium|<font color="DarkSlateGray">Horologium</font>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Horologium|(talk)]]</small> 14:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
274448 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274445 +++$+++ 274447 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.203547980E09 +++$+++ Horologium, I asked the person to prove his identity to OTRS, and while he has contacted us, he has failed to provide any proof whatsoever that he is who he claims to be. Further, the current feeling among admins who have reviewed the account is that there are serious concerns about the account, so I referred the matter to Checkusers. Because of the concern that he may be impersonating a living person, I've blocked the account and removed the posts that person made claiming to be the actor Jason Smith. If they prove their identity to the foundation the edits can easily be restored. Thanks for asking me. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Horologium, I asked the person to prove his identity to OTRS, and while he has contacted us, he has failed to provide any proof whatsoever that he is who he claims to be. Further, the current feeling among admins who have reviewed the account is that there are serious concerns about the account, so I referred the matter to Checkusers. Because of the concern that he may be impersonating a living person, I've blocked the account and removed the posts that person made claiming to be the actor Jason Smith. If they prove their identity to the foundation the edits can easily be restored. Thanks for asking me. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
274449 +++$+++ Ryulong +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274445 +++$+++ 274448 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.203573060E09 +++$+++ Oh noes, you b& the Red Power Ranger (or so he claims).\u2014 +++$+++ ::::Oh noes, you b& the Red Power Ranger (or so he claims).—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="gold">竜龙</font>]]) 21:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

504617 +++$+++ BlueCaper +++$+++ LordAmeth +++$+++ 504617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-14 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.197700320E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Second Opium War-guangzhou.jpg|center|thumb|200px|]]I just thought that you would like to know that an anonymous blogger is angry with you (as expressed in [[Talk:Opium Wars#Disgusting and overtly racist|his passage in the Opium Wars talk page]]). No big deal, just letting you know.  +++$+++ [[Image:Second Opium War-guangzhou.jpg|center|thumb|200px|]]I just thought that you would like to know that an anonymous blogger is angry with you (as expressed in [[Talk:Opium Wars#Disgusting and overtly racist|his passage in the Opium Wars talk page]]). No big deal, just letting you know. [[User:BlueCaper|BlueCaper]] ([[User talk:BlueCaper|talk]]) 22:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
504618 +++$+++ LordAmeth +++$+++ LordAmeth +++$+++ 504617 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-15 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.197707880E09 +++$+++ Thank you for letting me know. I probably shouldn't dignify his accusations with a response, as that'll only provoke him (and perhaps others) further. But still, good to know that's going on. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for letting me know. I probably shouldn't dignify his accusations with a response, as that'll only provoke him (and perhaps others) further. But still, good to know that's going on. Cheers. [[User:LordAmeth|LordAmeth]] ([[User talk:LordAmeth#top|talk]]) 00:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

536592 +++$+++ Riana dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-04 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.162635060E09 +++$+++ <nowiki>*jealous*<\/nowiki> [[Napoleon Dynamite|Lucky!]] I'm waiting for [[User:Glen_S|Glen]] to come back from his Wikibreak, and he's going to take on the unenviable task of coaching me. I'm glad I'm not in his shoes... ''' +++$+++ <nowiki>*jealous*</nowiki> [[Napoleon Dynamite|Lucky!]] I'm waiting for [[User:Glen_S|Glen]] to come back from his Wikibreak, and he's going to take on the unenviable task of coaching me. I'm glad I'm not in his shoes... '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:Riana dzasta|dzasta]]''' 02:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
536593 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536592 +++$+++ 536592 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.162716180E09 +++$+++ I've created the admin coaching page [[User talk:Daveydweeb\/Admin coaching|here]]. It's in the user talk namespace, so that I'm alerted to changes and can save a little time looking through my obscenely long watchlist. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ :I've created the admin coaching page [[User talk:Daveydweeb/Admin coaching|here]]. It's in the user talk namespace, so that I'm alerted to changes and can save a little time looking through my obscenely long watchlist. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''patch''']]</sub></span>) 00:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
536594 +++$+++ Riana dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536592 +++$+++ 536592 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.162726020E09 +++$+++ <nowiki>*almost*<\/nowiki>... yikes. Nah, he does a great job. Too bad I'm going on a break starting today and probably ending 23-Nov. I hope he doesn't decide to start up in that time. :s Hope you're doing well - I really shouldn't stick around here anymore... take care, and all the best with your exams... and happy birthday from me in advance! Cheers, ''' +++$+++ :<nowiki>*almost*</nowiki>... yikes. Nah, he does a great job. Too bad I'm going on a break starting today and probably ending 23-Nov. I hope he doesn't decide to start up in that time. :s Hope you're doing well - I really shouldn't stick around here anymore... take care, and all the best with your exams... and happy birthday from me in advance! Cheers, '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:Riana dzasta|dzasta]]''' 03:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

274450 +++$+++ Philaweb +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-23 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.203803340E09 +++$+++ Is it possible you can rollback [[List of Heads of State of Latvia]] to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_Heads_of_State_of_Latvia&diff=192337407&oldid=192307493 this version] when the article was titled [[List of Presidents of Latvia]]. The user [[User:Ivan Bogdanov|Ivan Bogdanov]] and prior to that the anon-ID [[Special:Contributions\/89.216.91.129|89.216.91.129]] added an unrelated list to the article and reverted the undone revisions several times subsequently without any effort of communicating via the article talk page.  +++$+++ Is it possible you can rollback [[List of Heads of State of Latvia]] to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Heads_of_State_of_Latvia&diff=192337407&oldid=192307493 this version] when the article was titled [[List of Presidents of Latvia]]. The user [[User:Ivan Bogdanov|Ivan Bogdanov]] and prior to that the anon-ID [[Special:Contributions/89.216.91.129|89.216.91.129]] added an unrelated list to the article and reverted the undone revisions several times subsequently without any effort of communicating via the article talk page. [[User:Philaweb|<span style="font-family:trebuchet MS;">Philaweb</span>]] [[User_talk:Philaweb|<span style="font-family:trebuchet MS;">T</span>]] 13:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
274451 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274450 +++$+++ 274450 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.203804000E09 +++$+++ Rollback only works on the last edit (or continuous set of edits from one user), so if I rolledback that article, I'd just be reverting your last edit. Also, I'm not really sure what you're suggesting...do you mean the article needs to be moved back to [[List of Presidents of Latvia]]? If so, it might be best if you post a message on the article's talk page explaining why it should be moved back. I don't really know much about this article and don't want to stumble into the middle of something and make an arbitrary decision. Also, I'm not really sure why you're asking me this (not that I mind or anything) but if it's because of the \"rollback request\" box on my userpage, that just means that people who want to have \"rollback\" switched on for their account can ask me to do so. It doesn't mean that I'm taking requests to use rollback for people...again, not that I mind you asking! Cheers,  +++$+++ :Rollback only works on the last edit (or continuous set of edits from one user), so if I rolledback that article, I'd just be reverting your last edit. Also, I'm not really sure what you're suggesting...do you mean the article needs to be moved back to [[List of Presidents of Latvia]]? If so, it might be best if you post a message on the article's talk page explaining why it should be moved back. I don't really know much about this article and don't want to stumble into the middle of something and make an arbitrary decision. Also, I'm not really sure why you're asking me this (not that I mind or anything) but if it's because of the "rollback request" box on my userpage, that just means that people who want to have "rollback" switched on for their account can ask me to do so. It doesn't mean that I'm taking requests to use rollback for people...again, not that I mind you asking! Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
274452 +++$+++ Philaweb +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274450 +++$+++ 274451 +++$+++ 2008-02-23 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.203804540E09 +++$+++ Well, I am sorry, then I misunderstood the purpose of the rollback function. It seems this issue needs a different approach.  +++$+++ ::Well, I am sorry, then I misunderstood the purpose of the rollback function. It seems this issue needs a different approach. [[User:Philaweb|<span style="font-family:trebuchet MS;">Philaweb</span>]] [[User_talk:Philaweb|<span style="font-family:trebuchet MS;">T</span>]] 14:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

536596 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-05 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.162754280E09 +++$+++ At [[Mock Duck]] you seem to have inappropriately removed notice that the original AfD discussion alluded to in your tag should be linked to. Please link to it, or remove the assertion that it exists from your tag.  - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ At [[Mock Duck]] you seem to have inappropriately removed notice that the original AfD discussion alluded to in your tag should be linked to. Please link to it, or remove the assertion that it exists from your tag.  - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 11:18, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
536597 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536596 +++$+++ 536596 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.162754880E09 +++$+++ The message I left on that page is no less valid than the tag you left there, and is no less a part of process because it doesn't have a \"pretty\" box. Since you now acknowledge that there ''is'' no AfD discussion, and that the circumstances under which the deletion occurred are ''not'' as described in your tag, it is your tag that needs revision or removal. - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ :The message I left on that page is no less valid than the tag you left there, and is no less a part of process because it doesn't have a "pretty" box. Since you now acknowledge that there ''is'' no AfD discussion, and that the circumstances under which the deletion occurred are ''not'' as described in your tag, it is your tag that needs revision or removal. - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 11:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
536598 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536596 +++$+++ 536597 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.162755300E09 +++$+++ Well, I gave you advice. You should take it. Don't place misleading tags on pages. The page in question appears to have been deleted out-of-process, and until some reasonable explanation of the reason for deletion is revealed, it's not speedy deletable.- <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ ::Well, I gave you advice. You should take it. Don't place misleading tags on pages. The page in question appears to have been deleted out-of-process, and until some reasonable explanation of the reason for deletion is revealed, it's not speedy deletable.- <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 11:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
536599 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536596 +++$+++ 536598 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.162756140E09 +++$+++ I've been perfectly civil, and it's not appropriate for you to suggest that I haven't. You've placed an inappropriate, misleading tag on an article that may or may not eventually be deleted, based on further elaboration by Cyde as to the reasons for deletion. You should remove it, and replace it with an AFD if you feel the article should be deleted.  - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ :::I've been perfectly civil, and it's not appropriate for you to suggest that I haven't. You've placed an inappropriate, misleading tag on an article that may or may not eventually be deleted, based on further elaboration by Cyde as to the reasons for deletion. You should remove it, and replace it with an AFD if you feel the article should be deleted.  - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 11:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
536600 +++$+++ Riana dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536596 +++$+++ 536597 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.162760340E09 +++$+++ Just stickin' up for my beliefs... Hmmm, I can hear [[You're the Voice|John Farnham]] in the background. :p ''' +++$+++ ::Just stickin' up for my beliefs... Hmmm, I can hear [[You're the Voice|John Farnham]] in the background. :p '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:Riana dzasta|dzasta]]''' 12:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
536601 +++$+++ Riana dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536596 +++$+++ 536600 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.162760880E09 +++$+++ John Farnham, mad? Never... although apparently he turned down an offer to join Queen <sup>[''citation needed'']<\/sup>. I don't think I've ever been in a taxi without John Farnham playing in the background. Hmmm, that was random. ''' +++$+++ :::John Farnham, mad? Never... although apparently he turned down an offer to join Queen <sup>[''citation needed'']</sup>. I don't think I've ever been in a taxi without John Farnham playing in the background. Hmmm, that was random. '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:Riana dzasta|dzasta]]''' 13:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
536602 +++$+++ Riana dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536596 +++$+++ 536601 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.162761120E09 +++$+++ ... obviously another <s>Kellogs' Crunchy Nut<\/s> person who shouldn't be editing so close to midnight. Bah, what a break this has been from editing, I've been here pretty much all day. Meh. ''' +++$+++ ::::... obviously another <s>Kellogs' Crunchy Nut</s> person who shouldn't be editing so close to midnight. Bah, what a break this has been from editing, I've been here pretty much all day. Meh. '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:Riana dzasta|dzasta]]''' 13:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
536603 +++$+++ Riana dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536596 +++$+++ 536600 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.162761960E09 +++$+++ RFC? Oi vey. Well, I've been linked to a few times, I'll do my bit. ''' +++$+++ :::RFC? Oi vey. Well, I've been linked to a few times, I'll do my bit. '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:Riana dzasta|dzasta]]''' 13:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
536604 +++$+++ Riana dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536596 +++$+++ 536603 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.162762860E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_comment%2FNunh-huh&diff=85844791&oldid=85844213 There]. Feel icky now. ''' +++$+++ ::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_comment%2FNunh-huh&diff=85844791&oldid=85844213 There]. Feel icky now. '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:Riana dzasta|dzasta]]''' 13:41, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

274453 +++$+++ Philaweb +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274453 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-25 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.204002780E09 +++$+++ Please have a look at user [[User:Ivan Bogdanov]]'s latest [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Ivan_Bogdanov&diff=194013275&oldid=194013213 reversion warnings]. Please consider the option of blocking him from editing Wikipedia.  +++$+++ Please have a look at user [[User:Ivan Bogdanov]]'s latest [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ivan_Bogdanov&diff=194013275&oldid=194013213 reversion warnings]. Please consider the option of blocking him from editing Wikipedia. [[User:Philaweb|<span style="font-family:trebuchet MS;">Philaweb</span>]] [[User_talk:Philaweb|<span style="font-family:trebuchet MS;">T</span>]] 21:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
274454 +++$+++ Philaweb +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274453 +++$+++ 274453 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.204078260E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol thumbs up.svg|20px|left]] Many thanks for your help.  +++$+++ :[[Image:Symbol thumbs up.svg|20px|left]] Many thanks for your help. [[User:Philaweb|<span style="font-family:trebuchet MS;">Philaweb</span>]] [[User_talk:Philaweb|<span style="font-family:trebuchet MS;">T</span>]] 18:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

12310 +++$+++ Sillyfolkboy +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-17 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.250532060E09 +++$+++ Congratulations my friend! Your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Valerie_Vili&diff=prev&oldid=200064173 mistake] on [[Valerie Vili]] has been [http:\/\/berlin.iaaf.org\/news\/kind=114\/newsid=53080.html broadcast to the world]. Long live \"citation needed\"! Take care. [[User:Sillyfolkboy|Sillyfolkboy]]<small> ([[User talk:Sillyfolkboy#top|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions\/Sillyfolkboy|edits]])<\/small>''<sup><font color=\"#0B7C08\"> +++$+++ Congratulations my friend! Your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Valerie_Vili&diff=prev&oldid=200064173 mistake] on [[Valerie Vili]] has been [http://berlin.iaaf.org/news/kind=114/newsid=53080.html broadcast to the world]. Long live "citation needed"! Take care. [[User:Sillyfolkboy|Sillyfolkboy]]<small> ([[User talk:Sillyfolkboy#top|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Sillyfolkboy|edits]])</small>''<sup><font color="#0B7C08">[[User:Sillyfolkboy/A|Join WikiProject Athletics!]]</font></sup>'' 11:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
12311 +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12310 +++$+++ 12310 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.250536440E09 +++$+++ Indeed, we're all victims of a bum source here. I just now located one that names her mother and corrected all the other wikipedia language versions and added the source where I could about her mother.  I should send her flowers to Auckland, I know she is a Mormon, maybe through her church. -- +++$+++ :Indeed, we're all victims of a bum source here. I just now located one that names her mother and corrected all the other wikipedia language versions and added the source where I could about her mother.  I should send her flowers to Auckland, I know she is a Mormon, maybe through her church. --[[User:Mareklug|Mareklug]] <sup>[[User talk:Mareklug|<b>talk</b>]]</sup> 12:14, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
12312 +++$+++ Sillyfolkboy +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12310 +++$+++ 12311 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.250541600E09 +++$+++ That would be very nice, but I would not feel too bad about it \u2013 it was a harmless mistake and we all know a bit more about Vili now. The beauty of Wikipedia is that it never stays wrong for long... Happy editing! [[User:Sillyfolkboy|Sillyfolkboy]]<small> ([[User talk:Sillyfolkboy#top|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions\/Sillyfolkboy|edits]])<\/small>''<sup><font color=\"#0B7C08\"> +++$+++ ::That would be very nice, but I would not feel too bad about it – it was a harmless mistake and we all know a bit more about Vili now. The beauty of Wikipedia is that it never stays wrong for long... Happy editing! [[User:Sillyfolkboy|Sillyfolkboy]]<small> ([[User talk:Sillyfolkboy#top|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Sillyfolkboy|edits]])</small>''<sup><font color="#0B7C08">[[User:Sillyfolkboy/A|Join WikiProject Athletics!]]</font></sup>'' 13:40, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

274455 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274455 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-26 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.204035720E09 +++$+++ Rushing around trying to support Sandy in between work and, well, you're quite right - copy pasted that sock message without looking more closely. Appreciate your adjustment and you for being there.-- +++$+++ Rushing around trying to support Sandy in between work and, well, you're quite right - copy pasted that sock message without looking more closely. Appreciate your adjustment and you for being there.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 06:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
274456 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274455 +++$+++ 274455 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.204036080E09 +++$+++ No probs. I was rather disappointed to read that Glitter was wasting our time and playing games when everyone went out of the way to  AGF and help her. Thanks for backing Sandy up and helping her with the CU etc. You're a good guy, Steve. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ :No probs. I was rather disappointed to read that Glitter was wasting our time and playing games when everyone went out of the way to  AGF and help her. Thanks for backing Sandy up and helping her with the CU etc. You're a good guy, Steve. :) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
274457 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274455 +++$+++ 274456 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.204036260E09 +++$+++ Well I am partly your prodigy - \"spawned\" by your good work - and thanks for the compliment.  Been meaning to ask - was there a Melbourne meet-up recently? Did you go? Are there photos?-- +++$+++ :*Well I am partly your prodigy - "spawned" by your good work - and thanks for the compliment.  Been meaning to ask - was there a Melbourne meet-up recently? Did you go? Are there photos?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 06:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
274458 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274455 +++$+++ 274457 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.204040340E09 +++$+++ Yes, there was a recent meetup and I took some pics but haven't uploaded them yet. Shall get around to doing that soon. When I do upload them I shall add them to my userpage with the others. You'll have to co-ordinate your next trip to Melbourne with one of our meetups, they're a lot of fun!  +++$+++ :::Yes, there was a recent meetup and I took some pics but haven't uploaded them yet. Shall get around to doing that soon. When I do upload them I shall add them to my userpage with the others. You'll have to co-ordinate your next trip to Melbourne with one of our meetups, they're a lot of fun! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
274459 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274455 +++$+++ 274458 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 08:16:00 +++$+++ 1.204042560E09 +++$+++ Yes I will if at all possible - actually I was in Melbourne on the last meet up day (I think) for a short while but was caught up with work. Besides would like to see what your and other smiling faces look like behind the user name. Looking forward to the photographs.-- +++$+++ :::*Yes I will if at all possible - actually I was in Melbourne on the last meet up day (I think) for a short while but was caught up with work. Besides would like to see what your and other smiling faces look like behind the user name. Looking forward to the photographs.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 08:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
274460 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274455 +++$+++ 274458 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.204043220E09 +++$+++ I shall look forward to that, but in the meanwhile I've sent you an email.  +++$+++ ::::I shall look forward to that, but in the meanwhile I've sent you an email. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
274461 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274455 +++$+++ 274460 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.204047300E09 +++$+++ Cool - Excellent msg and pinged you back :) -- +++$+++ ::::*Cool - Excellent msg and pinged you back :) --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 09:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

264196 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-07 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.183851540E09 +++$+++ Hello. [[User:Durin\/Fair use overuse explanation|This]] is a very clear explanation of non-free image overuse. Your recent edit summary made no sense in this respect. The difference between the images that were removed and the ones that remain is the ''quantity'' of those that remain! Wikipedia is not some cheap Geocities site with haphazard images dotted about for illiterates who can't go a paragraph without a pretty picture to look at. Non-free images are really enhance an understanding of the subject when words fall short. Most of the images are there merely for illustration, not to enhance understanding. I hope this is clear: I note other editors have attempted to explain this to you.  +++$+++ Hello. [[User:Durin/Fair use overuse explanation|This]] is a very clear explanation of non-free image overuse. Your recent edit summary made no sense in this respect. The difference between the images that were removed and the ones that remain is the ''quantity'' of those that remain! Wikipedia is not some cheap Geocities site with haphazard images dotted about for illiterates who can't go a paragraph without a pretty picture to look at. Non-free images are really enhance an understanding of the subject when words fall short. Most of the images are there merely for illustration, not to enhance understanding. I hope this is clear: I note other editors have attempted to explain this to you. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
264197 +++$+++ Jameshdl +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264196 +++$+++ 264196 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.183871940E09 +++$+++ Apoligies, I understand that you know more about the workings about wikipedia and I thank you for the message. Be good.  +++$+++ :Apoligies, I understand that you know more about the workings about wikipedia and I thank you for the message. Be good. [[User:Jameshdl|Jameshdl]] 22:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

12314 +++$+++ Tadija +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-15 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.253040900E09 +++$+++ All best, -  +++$+++ All best, - [[User:Tadija|Tadija]] ([[User talk:Tadija|talk]]) 11:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
12315 +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12314 +++$+++ 12314 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.253061540E09 +++$+++ It's certainly sensible, and mirrors what we did on Polish Wikipedia, albeit we only have one template there about Kosovo matters. I would hope there is no need for protection. Best wishes, -- +++$+++ :It's certainly sensible, and mirrors what we did on Polish Wikipedia, albeit we only have one template there about Kosovo matters. I would hope there is no need for protection. Best wishes, --[[User:Mareklug|Mareklug]] <sup>[[User talk:Mareklug|<b>talk</b>]]</sup> 17:39, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

12316 +++$+++ Plushy +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12316 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-08 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.260336060E09 +++$+++ Hej, m\xf3g\u0142by\u015b mi sprawdzi\u0107 t\u0142umaczenie? Pozdrawiam +++$+++ Hej, mógłbyś mi sprawdzić tłumaczenie? Pozdrawiam[[User:Plushy|Plushy]] ([[User talk:Plushy|talk]]) 21:21, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
12317 +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12316 +++$+++ 12316 +++$+++ 2009-12-09 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.260369300E09 +++$+++ {{done}} -- +++$+++ :{{done}} --[[User:Mareklug|Mareklug]] <sup>[[User talk:Mareklug|<b>talk</b>]]</sup> 06:35, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

12318 +++$+++ Fcsuper +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-30 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.262165820E09 +++$+++ You posted quotes from letters or emails you received from the City of San Jose on to the Talk:San Jose, CA article back in 2006.  Do you still have these correspondences in whole?  If so, perhaps we can get these published in some way in order to have a legit source for the information in the San Jose article regarding the accented e.  Thanks!  <span style=\"color:Purple\">\u2014<\/span> ''' +++$+++ You posted quotes from letters or emails you received from the City of San Jose on to the Talk:San Jose, CA article back in 2006.  Do you still have these correspondences in whole?  If so, perhaps we can get these published in some way in order to have a legit source for the information in the San Jose article regarding the accented e.  Thanks!  <span style="color:Purple">—</span> '''[[User:Fcsuper|<span style="color:#006699">f</span><span style="color:#6666FF">c</span><span style="color:#666699">s</span><span style="color:#336633">u</span><span style="color:#006699">p</span><span style="color:#6633FF">e</span><span style="color:#9966FF">r</span>]]'''<sup> ([[:User talk:Fcsuper|<span style="color:Olive">How's That?</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Fcsuper|<span style="color:Teal">That's How!</span>]])</sup> <sub>([http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Exclusionism <span style="color:Maroon">Exclusionistic</span>] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Immediatism <span style="color:Red">Immediatist</span>] ) </sub><span style="color:Purple">—</span>  01:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
12319 +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12318 +++$+++ 12318 +++$+++ 2009-12-30 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.262166840E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, these are the only copies I retained. Nothing stops us from writing again to the City office. -- +++$+++ :Unfortunately, these are the only copies I retained. Nothing stops us from writing again to the City office. --[[User:Mareklug|Mareklug]] <sup>[[User talk:Mareklug|<b>talk</b>]]</sup> 01:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

274463 +++$+++ GaryGazza +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-26 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.204093380E09 +++$+++ My patience is being tested, I am happy to calm down but time shift put a snide remark about 2min after I posted my response. I have behaved but he isn't. It is hard to be civil when he is disruptive. can you block him for a day  +++$+++ My patience is being tested, I am happy to calm down but time shift put a snide remark about 2min after I posted my response. I have behaved but he isn't. It is hard to be civil when he is disruptive. can you block him for a day [[User:GaryGazza|GaryGazza]] ([[User talk:GaryGazza|talk]]) 22:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
274464 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274463 +++$+++ 274463 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.204098600E09 +++$+++ It's not really a good idea to ask for Timeshift to be blocked when you have both been behaving badly because you're likely to find that you've been blocked along with him. It's kinda like dealing with squabbling kids. I think most administrators would look at the edit warring and childish bickering and decide to block both of you. If you have a serious proposal to make regarding the article, I suggest you make it. But I think it would be in your interests to stop talking about Timeshift. If you don't like him or whatever the problem is, then just ignore him: don't talk to or about him. But seriously, if you continue like this your time on Wikipedia is going to be very short and very unpleasant because it is just a matter of time before we indefinitely block you. So if you're here to contribute constructively to the article, then get on with it, and if you're just here to troll then please find something else to do.  +++$+++ :It's not really a good idea to ask for Timeshift to be blocked when you have both been behaving badly because you're likely to find that you've been blocked along with him. It's kinda like dealing with squabbling kids. I think most administrators would look at the edit warring and childish bickering and decide to block both of you. If you have a serious proposal to make regarding the article, I suggest you make it. But I think it would be in your interests to stop talking about Timeshift. If you don't like him or whatever the problem is, then just ignore him: don't talk to or about him. But seriously, if you continue like this your time on Wikipedia is going to be very short and very unpleasant because it is just a matter of time before we indefinitely block you. So if you're here to contribute constructively to the article, then get on with it, and if you're just here to troll then please find something else to do. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 23:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

536608 +++$+++ Riana dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536608 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-05 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.162765320E09 +++$+++ Aye, I should get me into bed as well - I shall have a delightful day studying DNA <s>transclusion<\/s> ''translation'' tomorrow. <small>Kill me... <\/small> Take care, dude. ''' +++$+++ Aye, I should get me into bed as well - I shall have a delightful day studying DNA <s>transclusion</s> ''translation'' tomorrow. <small>Kill me... </small> Take care, dude. '''[[User:Riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:Riana dzasta|dzasta]]''' 14:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
536609 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536608 +++$+++ 536608 +++$+++ 2006-06-12 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.150105560E09 +++$+++ #''(assigned)''  I'd like to run for adminship (again) at some point in the next few months, but I'm eager to work on developing a proper approach toward the mop before requesting it. I '''do not''' wish to receive coaching until after November 7, since my final school exams will reduce my editing rate and make it a waste of time for all involved. If I reach the top of the line, I'd like to defer any coaching until after that date. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ :#''(assigned)''  I'd like to run for adminship (again) at some point in the next few months, but I'm eager to work on developing a proper approach toward the mop before requesting it. I '''do not''' wish to receive coaching until after November 7, since my final school exams will reduce my editing rate and make it a waste of time for all involved. If I reach the top of the line, I'd like to defer any coaching until after that date. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''patch''']]</sub></span>) 02:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
536610 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536608 +++$+++ 536608 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.156887360E09 +++$+++ #:'''Note''': I recently [[Wikipedia: Requests for adminship\/RandyWang|requested]] adminship, but was unsuccessful. The concerns raised at that RfA, particularly related to my use of CSD tags, would ideally be an important part of any coaching I'd receive. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ :#:'''Note''': I recently [[Wikipedia: Requests for adminship/RandyWang|requested]] adminship, but was unsuccessful. The concerns raised at that RfA, particularly related to my use of CSD tags, would ideally be an important part of any coaching I'd receive. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''patch''']]</sub></span>) 14:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

12322 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12322 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-16 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.282006440E09 +++$+++ Can you give me 20 mins or so to edit this in peace? I've got plenty of sources via Pprune with which to improve the article. Did you not see the {{tl|inuse}} I placed at the top of the article.  +++$+++ Can you give me 20 mins or so to edit this in peace? I've got plenty of sources via Pprune with which to improve the article. Did you not see the {{tl|inuse}} I placed at the top of the article. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 17:54, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
12323 +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12322 +++$+++ 12322 +++$+++ 2010-08-16 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.282007280E09 +++$+++ No, I did not.  Look at the time stamps.  -- +++$+++ :No, I did not.  Look at the time stamps.  --[[User:Mareklug|Mareklug]] <sup>[[User talk:Mareklug|<b>talk</b>]]</sup> 18:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
12324 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12322 +++$+++ 12323 +++$+++ 2010-08-17 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.282102800E09 +++$+++ I filched the iwls from the Portuguese article. If they are not valid, then they should go.  +++$+++ ::I filched the iwls from the Portuguese article. If they are not valid, then they should go. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 20:40, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
12325 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ Mareklug +++$+++ 12322 +++$+++ 12324 +++$+++ 2010-08-17 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.282104780E09 +++$+++ Non-working iwls removed from en and pt articles. Got reverted by a bot at pt wiki, but I reverted it and explained situation as best I could seeing as I'm pt-0.  +++$+++ :::Non-working iwls removed from en and pt articles. Got reverted by a bot at pt wiki, but I reverted it and explained situation as best I could seeing as I'm pt-0. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 21:13, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

274468 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-03 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.204566000E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah - I had reason to start an ANI today [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Serious_Conflict_of_Interest_-_User:Igorberger|here]] but I felt at the time at a bit of a loss as to whether that was the right place for it.  Another editor suggested reporting it to the foundation and perhaps that is correct - but I would appreciate your opinion.  (PS I may not see your reply until late tomorrow as I have a meeting in Canberra tomorrow and will close early tonight ready for the early departure).-- +++$+++ Hi Sarah - I had reason to start an ANI today [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Serious_Conflict_of_Interest_-_User:Igorberger|here]] but I felt at the time at a bit of a loss as to whether that was the right place for it.  Another editor suggested reporting it to the foundation and perhaps that is correct - but I would appreciate your opinion.  (PS I may not see your reply until late tomorrow as I have a meeting in Canberra tomorrow and will close early tonight ready for the early departure).--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 09:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
274469 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274468 +++$+++ 274468 +++$+++ 2008-03-03 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.204568340E09 +++$+++ Noted your response thank you - glad to have it as always.-- +++$+++ *Noted your response thank you - glad to have it as always.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 10:19, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
274470 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274468 +++$+++ 274468 +++$+++ 2008-03-03 10:26:00 +++$+++ 1.204568760E09 +++$+++ (after ec)Hmm, interesting. I hope he removes those claims himself, voluntarily, but if he doesn't I think we should quickly pass it onto the office. But really, I'm hoping that Igor removes those claims himself. If he is here on Wikipedia in good faith then he should do so voluntarily. Have a safe trip, Steve.   +++$+++ :(after ec)Hmm, interesting. I hope he removes those claims himself, voluntarily, but if he doesn't I think we should quickly pass it onto the office. But really, I'm hoping that Igor removes those claims himself. If he is here on Wikipedia in good faith then he should do so voluntarily. Have a safe trip, Steve.  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
274471 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274468 +++$+++ 274470 +++$+++ 2008-03-03 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.204569000E09 +++$+++ Well he should remove them within a day or two I would say.  Cheers my friend. :) -- +++$+++ :*Well he should remove them within a day or two I would say.  Cheers my friend. :) --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 10:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
274472 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274468 +++$+++ 274471 +++$+++ 2008-03-04 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.204655640E09 +++$+++ Can you come back to here if you have the time or interest please.  I need to get some more views on what I think continues to be a complex case of conflict of interest by this editor - and whether this should just got to the Wikipedia Foundation now rather than us trying to deliberate it further.  Thank you.-- +++$+++ ::*Can you come back to here if you have the time or interest please.  I need to get some more views on what I think continues to be a complex case of conflict of interest by this editor - and whether this should just got to the Wikipedia Foundation now rather than us trying to deliberate it further.  Thank you.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 10:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
274473 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274468 +++$+++ 274471 +++$+++ 2008-03-04 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.204655820E09 +++$+++ Hey Steve. Did you hear the great news (see my userpage if not). Sure, I'm around now and available to help - what did you want me to do?  +++$+++ :::Hey Steve. Did you hear the great news (see my userpage if not). Sure, I'm around now and available to help - what did you want me to do? [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

526342 +++$+++ ProfJeFF +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526342 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-22 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.161502740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for looking over Foetry.com, determining that the article is not advertising, and making the citation adjustments that you did. Oddly, or perhaps not, my students are doing better work than I am when it comes to footnotes and whatnot (they're all at work on individual poets...Foetry.com is a separate project). I keep wanting to use in-line citations as though I were writing a traditional paper. With your references there as an example, I think I'll be able to produce the same sort of references with much greater ease now. With appreciation -  +++$+++ Thanks for looking over Foetry.com, determining that the article is not advertising, and making the citation adjustments that you did. Oddly, or perhaps not, my students are doing better work than I am when it comes to footnotes and whatnot (they're all at work on individual poets...Foetry.com is a separate project). I keep wanting to use in-line citations as though I were writing a traditional paper. With your references there as an example, I think I'll be able to produce the same sort of references with much greater ease now. With appreciation - [[User:ProfJeFF|ProfJeFF]] 00:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
526343 +++$+++ ProfJeFF +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526342 +++$+++ 526342 +++$+++ 2006-10-22 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.161506700E09 +++$+++ Yes, I'm very happy to have them working on things here. The assignment is to find a poet (preferably one whose work they enjoy) who is either not represented on Wikipedia or who could stand to have a great deal more information included. They're to comb through the available biographical and critical information on that poet and post here (not violating the original research policy, of course, but as university students they have easy access to scholarly journals from which they can draw critical appraisals of the poets' works, not just the blurbs available online). This way their research actually benefits someone instead of just being busywork for a grade. I won't say which poets are being worked on, as that could lead to destroying their (relative) anonymity, but I've been very happy with them so far. All the best -  +++$+++ :Yes, I'm very happy to have them working on things here. The assignment is to find a poet (preferably one whose work they enjoy) who is either not represented on Wikipedia or who could stand to have a great deal more information included. They're to comb through the available biographical and critical information on that poet and post here (not violating the original research policy, of course, but as university students they have easy access to scholarly journals from which they can draw critical appraisals of the poets' works, not just the blurbs available online). This way their research actually benefits someone instead of just being busywork for a grade. I won't say which poets are being worked on, as that could lead to destroying their (relative) anonymity, but I've been very happy with them so far. All the best - [[User:ProfJeFF|ProfJeFF]] 01:45, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

274474 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274474 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-04 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.204656420E09 +++$+++ Hey Sarah - that is bloody great news - wow.  What great work.  In terms of this I was asked by Igor to consider his changes to his websites but could not in all honesty support the changes - especially after reading another editor's comments.  In considering I also came across what appears to be some more undeclared conflict of interest editing.  I have written to all editors who have come to the ANI thread - I think I am just wanting other input because I don't want to appear as if I am gunning for Igor when in fact I am just trying to do my job. -- +++$+++ Hey Sarah - that is bloody great news - wow.  What great work.  In terms of this I was asked by Igor to consider his changes to his websites but could not in all honesty support the changes - especially after reading another editor's comments.  In considering I also came across what appears to be some more undeclared conflict of interest editing.  I have written to all editors who have come to the ANI thread - I think I am just wanting other input because I don't want to appear as if I am gunning for Igor when in fact I am just trying to do my job. --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 10:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
274475 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274474 +++$+++ 274474 +++$+++ 2008-03-04 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.204666620E09 +++$+++ My apologies, Steve. I got called away from my laptop and then got sidetracked irl. I'm going to have a look at ANI now but I may have to wait until the morning to comment because I'm really tired. Sorry, mate.  +++$+++ :My apologies, Steve. I got called away from my laptop and then got sidetracked irl. I'm going to have a look at ANI now but I may have to wait until the morning to comment because I'm really tired. Sorry, mate. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
274476 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274474 +++$+++ 274475 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Hey that's no problem at all Sarah.  I sort have closed the discussion (well from my point).  Have been dealing with the problematic edits of Igorberger for some time now and have come to some unfortunate conclusions about him.  I have posted a request at his talk page to remove all of wikipedia.org comments on his websites and I will see how he responds.  If in the negative I will post a report to the foundation.  I would appreciate any help you can give with contact points for such a report?  At the very least there are a lot of other editors looking at his contributions and the way that he is contributing.  I hope you got\/are getting a good night's rest. Best dreams.20:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :*Hey that's no problem at all Sarah.  I sort have closed the discussion (well from my point).  Have been dealing with the problematic edits of Igorberger for some time now and have come to some unfortunate conclusions about him.  I have posted a request at his talk page to remove all of wikipedia.org comments on his websites and I will see how he responds.  If in the negative I will post a report to the foundation.  I would appreciate any help you can give with contact points for such a report?  At the very least there are a lot of other editors looking at his contributions and the way that he is contributing.  I hope you got/are getting a good night's rest. Best dreams.20:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
274477 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274474 +++$+++ 274475 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.204740240E09 +++$+++ Sure Steve. I'll email you some contact details.  +++$+++ ::Sure Steve. I'll email you some contact details. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
274478 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274474 +++$+++ 274477 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.204742700E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah - that will be helpful.  I am away travelling to Melbourne tomorrow but will deal with this matter when I get back. Cheers.-- +++$+++ ::*Thanks Sarah - that will be helpful.  I am away travelling to Melbourne tomorrow but will deal with this matter when I get back. Cheers.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 10:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

274479 +++$+++ Dihydrogen Monoxide +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274479 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-04 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.204700880E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray; height:5em;\"| For your work in establishing Wikimedia Australia. Long live the cabal! :) '' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray; height:5em;"| For your work in establishing Wikimedia Australia. Long live the cabal! :) ''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|dihydrogen monoxide]]'' <small>([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|H<sub>2</sub>0]])</small> 23:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
274480 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274479 +++$+++ 274479 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.204745700E09 +++$+++ Thanks mate, much appreciated but I really didn't do anything. Brian is the one who deserves most of the credit - he sort of grabbed us by the scruff of the neck and dragged us over the line. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks mate, much appreciated but I really didn't do anything. Brian is the one who deserves most of the credit - he sort of grabbed us by the scruff of the neck and dragged us over the line. :) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
274481 +++$+++ Dihydrogen Monoxide +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274479 +++$+++ 274480 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.204746780E09 +++$+++ Eek, totally forgot about Brian...I'll give him one now too! You announced it to AWNB; that counts for something I'm sure. :) '' +++$+++ ::Eek, totally forgot about Brian...I'll give him one now too! You announced it to AWNB; that counts for something I'm sure. :) ''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|dihydrogen monoxide]]'' <small>([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|H<sub>2</sub>0]])</small> 11:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

536624 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536624 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-10 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.163187840E09 +++$+++ <nowiki>*jaw drops*<\/nowiki> You are ''fast''! Answering now... <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ <nowiki>*jaw drops*</nowiki> You are ''fast''! Answering now... <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 11:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
536625 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536624 +++$+++ 536624 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.163188500E09 +++$+++ Answered - as for GA, steady on, I've got some plans during the holidays... :) And thanks for the review (already know your ''real'' opinions of me, of course... ) <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :Answered - as for GA, steady on, I've got some plans during the holidays... :) And thanks for the review (already know your ''real'' opinions of me, of course... ) <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 11:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

274482 +++$+++ Wm +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 08:09:00 +++$+++ 1.204733340E09 +++$+++ Hi. I noticed that you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:John_Howard&curid=16335&diff=195829959&oldid=194394075 removed] my notice of the [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/Skyring|Rfc User Conduct]] concerning [[User:Skyring|Skyring]] from the [[Talk:John Howard|John Howard Talk Page]]. I am a bit perplexed by this as I was careful to consider what would be the best way to notify any involved editors of the Rfc while staying within the principles of [[WP:CANVASS]]. It seemed to me that posting to individual users to let them know about the Rfc would have been much more liable to critisism of being partisan. Posting to a wider audience through, for example, the Australian Notice Board or similar would be less likely to be noticed by involved parties. With this in mind I was wondering if you could let me know if you were guided by any particular part of [[Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines|Policies and Guidelines]] in removing the notice and what would be a more appropriate way for me to notify involved parties? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. I noticed that you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_Howard&curid=16335&diff=195829959&oldid=194394075 removed] my notice of the [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Skyring|Rfc User Conduct]] concerning [[User:Skyring|Skyring]] from the [[Talk:John Howard|John Howard Talk Page]]. I am a bit perplexed by this as I was careful to consider what would be the best way to notify any involved editors of the Rfc while staying within the principles of [[WP:CANVASS]]. It seemed to me that posting to individual users to let them know about the Rfc would have been much more liable to critisism of being partisan. Posting to a wider audience through, for example, the Australian Notice Board or similar would be less likely to be noticed by involved parties. With this in mind I was wondering if you could let me know if you were guided by any particular part of [[Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines|Policies and Guidelines]] in removing the notice and what would be a more appropriate way for me to notify involved parties? Thanks. [[User:Wm|Wm]] ([[User talk:Wm|talk]]) 08:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
274483 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274482 +++$+++ 274482 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.204740120E09 +++$+++ It isn't appropriate to post something like that to an article talk page. Article talk pages are provided to discuss article content, not editors. If you're looking for \"involved editors\" well, you can pretty much count them on one hand and they are all the usual suspects that turned up at your RfC. I seriously doubt anyone would have invoked canvass if you'd notified the limited involved users directly - canvass is essentially about aggressive cross-spamming, not about informing involved parties. As for which policy\/guideline I used to I remove the notice, try anything from WP:COMMON SENSE to [[Wikipedia:TALK#Others.27_comments]]: \"Some examples of appropriately editing others' comments:...Deleting material not relevant to improving the article (per the above subsection #How to use article talk pages).\" Article talk pages are provided for discussing article content, they're not there for co-ordinating moves against  a particular editor or even for discussing others.  +++$+++ :It isn't appropriate to post something like that to an article talk page. Article talk pages are provided to discuss article content, not editors. If you're looking for "involved editors" well, you can pretty much count them on one hand and they are all the usual suspects that turned up at your RfC. I seriously doubt anyone would have invoked canvass if you'd notified the limited involved users directly - canvass is essentially about aggressive cross-spamming, not about informing involved parties. As for which policy/guideline I used to I remove the notice, try anything from WP:COMMON SENSE to [[Wikipedia:TALK#Others.27_comments]]: "Some examples of appropriately editing others' comments:...Deleting material not relevant to improving the article (per the above subsection #How to use article talk pages)." Article talk pages are provided for discussing article content, they're not there for co-ordinating moves against  a particular editor or even for discussing others. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
274484 +++$+++ Wm +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274482 +++$+++ 274483 +++$+++ 2008-03-06 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.204830840E09 +++$+++ OK. I am interested in your view but am sorry that I can't accept your arguments completely without further discussion but I reckon we might both consider that we have better things to do than further discuss this now rather moot point. Thanks for the reply though.  +++$+++ ::OK. I am interested in your view but am sorry that I can't accept your arguments completely without further discussion but I reckon we might both consider that we have better things to do than further discuss this now rather moot point. Thanks for the reply though. [[User:Wm|Wm]] ([[User talk:Wm|talk]]) 11:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

570035 +++$+++ MaxEnt +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-19 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.145439060E09 +++$+++ I just touched up the [[claw-free permutation]] to reference Ivan Damgard as originating this term.  I don't think this page explains itself very well, certainly not to the level of your M-D construction page; I'm not entirely sure this page should exist.  You might wish to have a go at it since you seem to know this topic.  I'll watch here for any reply.   +++$+++ I just touched up the [[claw-free permutation]] to reference Ivan Damgard as originating this term.  I don't think this page explains itself very well, certainly not to the level of your M-D construction page; I'm not entirely sure this page should exist.  You might wish to have a go at it since you seem to know this topic.  I'll watch here for any reply.  [[User:MaxEnt|MaxEnt]] 02:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
570036 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570035 +++$+++ 570035 +++$+++ 2006-05-21 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.148234160E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 10:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
570037 +++$+++ MaxEnt +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570035 +++$+++ 570036 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.148998560E09 +++$+++ Cool.  I'm removing this page from my watchlist.  Feel free to drop a note on my own talk page if there's anything you'd like to discuss when you get back to it.   +++$+++ ::Cool.  I'm removing this page from my watchlist.  Feel free to drop a note on my own talk page if there's anything you'd like to discuss when you get back to it.  [[User:MaxEnt|MaxEnt]] 07:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

12341 +++$+++ Gwen Gale +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-01 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.251856980E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ Cheers, [[User:Gwen Gale|Gwen Gale]] ([[User talk:Gwen Gale|talk]]) 19:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
12342 +++$+++ Dalejenkins +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12341 +++$+++ 12341 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.251940620E09 +++$+++ Done. ''' +++$+++ :Done. '''[[User:Dalejenkins|Dale]]''' 18:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

12343 +++$+++ Dalejenkins +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-02 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.251957600E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia{{#if:Big Brother 2009 (UK)|, as you did to [[:Big Brother 2009 (UK)]]}}, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> ''' +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia{{#if:Big Brother 2009 (UK)|, as you did to [[:Big Brother 2009 (UK)]]}}, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> '''[[User:Dalejenkins|Dale]]''' 23:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
12344 +++$+++ Turian +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12343 +++$+++ 12343 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.251958200E09 +++$+++ Leaky, TV shows are sources for themselves. Read up on the TV policies. \u2013 +++$+++ :Leaky, TV shows are sources for themselves. Read up on the TV policies. –[[User:Turian|'''<span style="color:#000000;">túrian</span>''']][[User_talk:Turian|''<span style="color:green;"><sup>patois</sup></span>'']] 23:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
12345 +++$+++ Dalejenkins +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12343 +++$+++ 12344 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.251958500E09 +++$+++ It's not a \"threat\" at all, that is a standard user template for such edits. ''' +++$+++ ::It's not a "threat" at all, that is a standard user template for such edits. '''[[User:Dalejenkins|Dale]]''' 23:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

536634 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536634 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.163594400E09 +++$+++ Hey Wang, I finished the transcript, there were a couple of words I couldn't catch though (sounded tech-y to me). Mind having a once-over? Cheers, <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ Hey Wang, I finished the transcript, there were a couple of words I couldn't catch though (sounded tech-y to me). Mind having a once-over? Cheers, <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 04:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
536635 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536634 +++$+++ 536634 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.163606640E09 +++$+++ Can't you just slow the playspeed down? That's what I did - I'm not a super typist or anything... :) <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :Can't you just slow the playspeed down? That's what I did - I'm not a super typist or anything... :) <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 08:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
536636 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536634 +++$+++ 536635 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.163612580E09 +++$+++ It's a bit annoying, granted... and you have to pause it every so often anyway. Still, if you don't particularly enjoy doing it, I'll do it for ya - I worked as a receptionist for 6 months before I finally went insane with boredom, so I'm used to dictation and stuff. <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::It's a bit annoying, granted... and you have to pause it every so often anyway. Still, if you don't particularly enjoy doing it, I'll do it for ya - I worked as a receptionist for 6 months before I finally went insane with boredom, so I'm used to dictation and stuff. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 09:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
536637 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536634 +++$+++ 536636 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.163615220E09 +++$+++ Hehe! I wouldn't particularly enjoy it, mind :p But you're doing the hardest job with the editing, so I'll take up the slack on this end. I was just thinking whether it would be appropriate to link relevant terms? The point of doing the transcript (I think) is to give people information, and I think links to things like Larry's blog, metaterms like inclusionism, deletionism etc, might be helpful for people browsing through. Watchufink? <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :::Hehe! I wouldn't particularly enjoy it, mind :p But you're doing the hardest job with the editing, so I'll take up the slack on this end. I was just thinking whether it would be appropriate to link relevant terms? The point of doing the transcript (I think) is to give people information, and I think links to things like Larry's blog, metaterms like inclusionism, deletionism etc, might be helpful for people browsing through. Watchufink? <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 10:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
536638 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536634 +++$+++ 536637 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.163616300E09 +++$+++ Great minds, and all that... I'll link what I can find, feel free to run through it later and tell me if I've linked incorrectly. *hopes CZ links won't be barred by the spamfilter or anything like that* <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::::Great minds, and all that... I'll link what I can find, feel free to run through it later and tell me if I've linked incorrectly. *hopes CZ links won't be barred by the spamfilter or anything like that* <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 10:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
536639 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536634 +++$+++ 536638 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.163617020E09 +++$+++ Hey, sure! I probably won't be able to do a transcript before the weekend, though. By the way, Methodical Culturalism seems to be ''methodischer kulturalismus'' - God bless Google Translator... <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :::::Hey, sure! I probably won't be able to do a transcript before the weekend, though. By the way, Methodical Culturalism seems to be ''methodischer kulturalismus'' - God bless Google Translator... <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 10:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
536640 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536634 +++$+++ 536639 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.163618640E09 +++$+++ [[de:Methodischer Kulturalismus]]. Saved ya a minute or two :) <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::::::[[de:Methodischer Kulturalismus]]. Saved ya a minute or two :) <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 11:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

12348 +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-02 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.251959340E09 +++$+++ No need. Just don't aim bits of policy at me that won't stick. I have asked you a number of times to discuss this on the article's talk page and I'm still willing to do so but the article should be accurate (your ref. is wrong) and should be returned to the status quo. That's all I'm doing. You are removing my correct content - not the other way around.  +++$+++ No need. Just don't aim bits of policy at me that won't stick. I have asked you a number of times to discuss this on the article's talk page and I'm still willing to do so but the article should be accurate (your ref. is wrong) and should be returned to the status quo. That's all I'm doing. You are removing my correct content - not the other way around. [[User:Leaky caldron|leaky_caldron]] ([[User talk:Leaky caldron#top|talk]]) 23:29, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
12349 +++$+++ Dalejenkins +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12348 +++$+++ 12348 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.251959520E09 +++$+++ You claim that the Day number is wrong, I suggested you [[WP:BOLD|change it]] and you won't. You just want an argument. Good night. ''' +++$+++ :You claim that the Day number is wrong, I suggested you [[WP:BOLD|change it]] and you won't. You just want an argument. Good night. '''[[User:Dalejenkins|Dale]]''' 23:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
12350 +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12348 +++$+++ 12349 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.251959700E09 +++$+++ How can I possibly change the day when I fundementally disagree with the template. That would be silly. If you are agreeable we can take it here: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Third_opinion.  All I wish is for the questions on the talk page about the cite episode template and consensus to be answered.  +++$+++ ::How can I possibly change the day when I fundementally disagree with the template. That would be silly. If you are agreeable we can take it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Third_opinion.  All I wish is for the questions on the talk page about the cite episode template and consensus to be answered. [[User:Leaky caldron|leaky_caldron]] ([[User talk:Leaky caldron#top|talk]]) 23:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

12351 +++$+++ Turian +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-03 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.251965460E09 +++$+++ [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''{{#if:Big Brother 2009 (UK)|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Big Brother 2009 (UK)]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> \u2013 +++$+++ [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''{{#if:Big Brother 2009 (UK)|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Big Brother 2009 (UK)]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> –[[User:Turian|'''<span style="color:#000000;">túrian</span>''']][[User_talk:Turian|''<span style="color:green;"><sup>patois</sup></span>'']] 01:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
12352 +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12351 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.251966000E09 +++$+++ As you very well know, I have made every effort to resolve this. It is not me who is attempting to insert incorrect details and using a template for which their is no consensus. I am perfectly happy for actions to be examined by anyone, but you have no evidence to justify and claim to disruption. I am aware of the discussion here http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard&oldid=311573807#Is_Big_Brother_Network_a_reliable_source_for_events_on_the_Big_Brother_reality_TV_show.3F and it clearly demonstrates that the issue of verifiabilty and use of programme material is under consideration. The return to my original edit using non-disputed sources is entirely correct. Tell me how it is not and I will reconsider, but going on about distruption when my content is the only accurate & verified source available seems on add way to do business. I am trying to assume good faith but I am unsure why you refuse to answer my questions.  +++$+++ ::As you very well know, I have made every effort to resolve this. It is not me who is attempting to insert incorrect details and using a template for which their is no consensus. I am perfectly happy for actions to be examined by anyone, but you have no evidence to justify and claim to disruption. I am aware of the discussion here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&oldid=311573807#Is_Big_Brother_Network_a_reliable_source_for_events_on_the_Big_Brother_reality_TV_show.3F and it clearly demonstrates that the issue of verifiabilty and use of programme material is under consideration. The return to my original edit using non-disputed sources is entirely correct. Tell me how it is not and I will reconsider, but going on about distruption when my content is the only accurate & verified source available seems on add way to do business. I am trying to assume good faith but I am unsure why you refuse to answer my questions. [[User:Leaky caldron|leaky_caldron]] ([[User talk:Leaky caldron#top|talk]]) 01:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
12353 +++$+++ Turian +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12351 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.251966840E09 +++$+++ They are not incorrect details. And there was a pretty basic consensus. If more users disagree, I will gladly keep it. But your edit summary had nothing to do with what you edited (and yet, you still did it, violating the 3RR). \u2013 +++$+++ :::They are not incorrect details. And there was a pretty basic consensus. If more users disagree, I will gladly keep it. But your edit summary had nothing to do with what you edited (and yet, you still did it, violating the 3RR). –[[User:Turian|'''<span style="color:#000000;">túrian</span>''']][[User_talk:Turian|''<span style="color:green;"><sup>patois</sup></span>'']] 01:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

401947 +++$+++ AndyTheGrump +++$+++ Ultraexactzz +++$+++ 401947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-20 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.298243700E09 +++$+++ Enough. If any further comments regarding my behaviour are made here (the talk page of an editor who is not participating in the discussion) I will be making a formal complaint. This is entirely inappropriate. Either discuss this in a more open place, or cease referring to individuals' behaviour.  +++$+++ Enough. If any further comments regarding my behaviour are made here (the talk page of an editor who is not participating in the discussion) I will be making a formal complaint. This is entirely inappropriate. Either discuss this in a more open place, or cease referring to individuals' behaviour. [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 15:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
401948 +++$+++ 68.198.135.130 +++$+++ Ultraexactzz +++$+++ 401947 +++$+++ 401947 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.298245620E09 +++$+++ I was not given the benefit of doubt, and I don't think you have immunity from criticism. I believe ''your'' behavior was entirely inappropriate, and I retain the right to make a formal complaint myself. I discussed the reason I'm using this talk page in my posting above, this was supposed to hopefully be a discussion between me and  +++$+++ :I was not given the benefit of doubt, and I don't think you have immunity from criticism. I believe ''your'' behavior was entirely inappropriate, and I retain the right to make a formal complaint myself. I discussed the reason I'm using this talk page in my posting above, this was supposed to hopefully be a discussion between me and [[User:Ultraexactzz]], since the other "discussions" read like cabals. Please tell me where is a more open place, I'll also pursue it there. How can I "cease referring to individuals' behaviour"? This is what it is about. I won't discuss it further with you here, I'd like to continue my point-of-view in this dispute so I can bring it to the present day. [[Special:Contributions/68.198.135.130|68.198.135.130]] ([[User talk:68.198.135.130|talk]]) 15:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
401949 +++$+++ 68.198.135.130 +++$+++ Ultraexactzz +++$+++ 401947 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-21 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.298337420E09 +++$+++ I will complain properly. But first I will lay out the facts as I see them, including information supporting my pov. [[Special:Contributions\/68.198.135.130|68.198.135.130]] ( +++$+++ :::I will complain properly. But first I will lay out the facts as I see them, including information supporting my pov. [[Special:Contributions/68.198.135.130|68.198.135.130]] ([[User talk:68.198.135.130|talk]]) 17:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

274497 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-06 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.204800360E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, remember several months ago when I commented about the your RfA\/RfB table on your userpage? Well, I thought you might like to know that there are two options available for RfB reports now: [[User:SQL\/RfX Report]] for both RfAs and RfBs, and [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard\/RfB Report]] for just RfBs. I don't know if you want either of them, but I thought you'd want to know of them. :) Best wishes.  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, remember several months ago when I commented about the your RfA/RfB table on your userpage? Well, I thought you might like to know that there are two options available for RfB reports now: [[User:SQL/RfX Report]] for both RfAs and RfBs, and [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/RfB Report]] for just RfBs. I don't know if you want either of them, but I thought you'd want to know of them. :) Best wishes. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 02:46, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
274498 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274497 +++$+++ 274497 +++$+++ 2008-03-06 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.204800960E09 +++$+++ Cool, thanks Acalamari. I like SQL's one, I find it annoying when RfBs and RfAs aren't included together in the bot reports. Thanks again.:) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Cool, thanks Acalamari. I like SQL's one, I find it annoying when RfBs and RfAs aren't included together in the bot reports. Thanks again.:) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
274499 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274497 +++$+++ 274498 +++$+++ 2008-03-06 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.204801080E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :) Glad to be of help.  +++$+++ ::You're welcome. :) Glad to be of help. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 02:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

12354 +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-03 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.251967500E09 +++$+++ You are wrong. There is no consensus for the cite episode template. The article is wrong - the events described covered 2 days. I fail to understand how you can defend the clearly indefensible and not contribute to it's resolution on the talk page.  +++$+++ You are wrong. There is no consensus for the cite episode template. The article is wrong - the events described covered 2 days. I fail to understand how you can defend the clearly indefensible and not contribute to it's resolution on the talk page. [[User:Leaky caldron|leaky_caldron]] ([[User talk:Leaky caldron#top|talk]]) 01:45, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
12355 +++$+++ Turian +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12354 +++$+++ 12354 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.251968280E09 +++$+++ I have already told you it is common sense. And fix it yourself. Stop griping and just fix the misinformation. \u2013 +++$+++ :I have already told you it is common sense. And fix it yourself. Stop griping and just fix the misinformation. –[[User:Turian|'''<span style="color:#000000;">túrian</span>''']][[User_talk:Turian|''<span style="color:green;"><sup>patois</sup></span>'']] 01:58, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

274500 +++$+++ Zsero +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274500 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-06 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.204820580E09 +++$+++ As [[User:CeruleanFilms]] so cleverly deduced, I work for the Templar Illuminati of Zurich, and the Federal Reserve Bank.  On their behalf I thank you for helping us keep Topp Seekrit the membership of our front organisation, which had been exposed in that flagship of online journalism, the Sonoma County Free Press (which would surely have won a Pulitzer Prize, except for the fact that the Pulitzer committee are on our payroll too).  A small token of our appreciation has been deposited into a Swiss bank account on your behalf.  It remains for you only to discover the number; a small task which we feel confident in within your skillz.  --  +++$+++ As [[User:CeruleanFilms]] so cleverly deduced, I work for the Templar Illuminati of Zurich, and the Federal Reserve Bank.  On their behalf I thank you for helping us keep Topp Seekrit the membership of our front organisation, which had been exposed in that flagship of online journalism, the Sonoma County Free Press (which would surely have won a Pulitzer Prize, except for the fact that the Pulitzer committee are on our payroll too).  A small token of our appreciation has been deposited into a Swiss bank account on your behalf.  It remains for you only to discover the number; a small task which we feel confident in within your skillz.  -- [[User:Zsero|Zsero]] ([[User talk:Zsero|talk]]) 08:23, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
274501 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274500 +++$+++ 274500 +++$+++ 2008-03-06 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.204820760E09 +++$+++ hehehe Thanks! I'm off now to track down my super sekrit Swiss bank account! I do hope it was a generous small token! :D Cheers,  +++$+++ :hehehe Thanks! I'm off now to track down my super sekrit Swiss bank account! I do hope it was a generous small token! :D Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

12357 +++$+++ Bwilkins +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-06 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.254890760E09 +++$+++ Damn, I hope that if I ever get convinced to do RfA again that someone asks me that question - it is the whole reason that ''my'' question came into play. ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">talk\u2192<\/font>]]<span style=\"border:1px solid black;\">'''&nbsp; +++$+++ Damn, I hope that if I ever get convinced to do RfA again that someone asks me that question - it is the whole reason that ''my'' question came into play. ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">'''&nbsp;[[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]]&nbsp;'''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</font>]]) 21:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
12358 +++$+++ AGK +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12357 +++$+++ 12357 +++$+++ 2009-10-10 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.255241040E09 +++$+++ Please edit only your own section on the arbitration requests page. It helps the committee to review the matter with minimal clutter. I, or another clerk, will, in future, remove any further threaded discussions without prejudice. Many thanks,  +++$+++ * Please edit only your own section on the arbitration requests page. It helps the committee to review the matter with minimal clutter. I, or another clerk, will, in future, remove any further threaded discussions without prejudice. Many thanks, [[User talk:AGK|AGK]] 23:04, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

536646 +++$+++ Georgewilliamherbert +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536646 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.163686140E09 +++$+++ !colspan=\"2\" align=\"right\" |  +++$+++ !colspan="2" align="right" | [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] 06:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
536647 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536646 +++$+++ 536646 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.163750700E09 +++$+++ Hee! Thank you! :) I'm now old enough to [[Ale|quaff]], so this is -- in my opinion -- a momentous occasion. ;) [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Hee! Thank you! :) I'm now old enough to [[Ale|quaff]], so this is -- in my opinion -- a momentous occasion. ;) [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<span style="font-size: smaller;"><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2|'''patch''']]</sub></span>) 00:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

274503 +++$+++ GRBerry +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-06 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.204844040E09 +++$+++ Sarah, you expressed concern that this might be the banned user [[User:Neutralizer|Neutralizer]].  I was thinking it is the banned user [[User:Arthur Ellis|Arthur Ellis]] because of Ellis's history involving [[Warren Kinsella]] and [[Rachel Marsden]].  Thoughts?   +++$+++ Sarah, you expressed concern that this might be the banned user [[User:Neutralizer|Neutralizer]].  I was thinking it is the banned user [[User:Arthur Ellis|Arthur Ellis]] because of Ellis's history involving [[Warren Kinsella]] and [[Rachel Marsden]].  Thoughts?  [[User:GRBerry|GRBerry]] 14:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
274504 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274503 +++$+++ 274503 +++$+++ 2008-03-07 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.204881180E09 +++$+++ Hey GR. I'm pretty well certain that user is Neutralizer. But that doesn't mean that it's not Arthur Ellis. Back in 2006 a couple of people raised the suspicion that Arthur Ellis was in fact a Neutralizer sock, but both were banned independently within a month or so of each other and I don't know think anyone followed through with looking at it further. Personally, I think it's quite likely. There's certainly a lot of things the two personas have in common. You don't happen to know anything about Arthur Ellis's IPs? For the last three or so years Neutralizer has been coming in on the same Bell Sympatico ranges. He came back last year using European open proxies but once I accused him of being Neutralizer, he gave up the OPs and began using Bell Sympatico again. Range blocks are very effective, but unfortunately he comes in on three different ranges and while the blocks wipe him out, they also cause a fair bit of collateral damage. I'd be interested to know if Arthur Ellis also used Bell Sympatico and if so, if he was on the same ranges. Anyway, I think we're requesting checkuser of the Kurt Turkulney account but I'm pretty much as certain as I can be that it is Neutralizer but it could also be Arthur Ellis. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hey GR. I'm pretty well certain that user is Neutralizer. But that doesn't mean that it's not Arthur Ellis. Back in 2006 a couple of people raised the suspicion that Arthur Ellis was in fact a Neutralizer sock, but both were banned independently within a month or so of each other and I don't know think anyone followed through with looking at it further. Personally, I think it's quite likely. There's certainly a lot of things the two personas have in common. You don't happen to know anything about Arthur Ellis's IPs? For the last three or so years Neutralizer has been coming in on the same Bell Sympatico ranges. He came back last year using European open proxies but once I accused him of being Neutralizer, he gave up the OPs and began using Bell Sympatico again. Range blocks are very effective, but unfortunately he comes in on three different ranges and while the blocks wipe him out, they also cause a fair bit of collateral damage. I'd be interested to know if Arthur Ellis also used Bell Sympatico and if so, if he was on the same ranges. Anyway, I think we're requesting checkuser of the Kurt Turkulney account but I'm pretty much as certain as I can be that it is Neutralizer but it could also be Arthur Ellis. :) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
274505 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274503 +++$+++ 274503 +++$+++ 2008-03-07 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.204882920E09 +++$+++ Ah, yes, I see on the Arbitration case that Arthur Ellis openly admitted that he was a Bell Sympatico user. I know it's a pretty big ISP, so it doesn't really prove anything but it's just another piece of the puzzle.  +++$+++ :Ah, yes, I see on the Arbitration case that Arthur Ellis openly admitted that he was a Bell Sympatico user. I know it's a pretty big ISP, so it doesn't really prove anything but it's just another piece of the puzzle. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
274506 +++$+++ GRBerry +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274503 +++$+++ 274505 +++$+++ 2008-03-07 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.204883580E09 +++$+++ Well, I see the checkuser results are in and the block is now indefinite.  I don't know the IPs, but Ellis has had 17 checkuser requests, regularly resulting sock blocks.  There might be data in his RFCUs.   +++$+++ ::Well, I see the checkuser results are in and the block is now indefinite.  I don't know the IPs, but Ellis has had 17 checkuser requests, regularly resulting sock blocks.  There might be data in his RFCUs.  [[User:GRBerry|GRBerry]] 01:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

536649 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-17 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.163767320E09 +++$+++ ... you get an idea of the sort of people I hang out with. :D Enjoy your day, and make the most of it, 'cause it only happens once! <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ... you get an idea of the sort of people I hang out with. :D Enjoy your day, and make the most of it, 'cause it only happens once! <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 04:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
536650 +++$+++ Ginkgo100 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536649 +++$+++ 536649 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.163768460E09 +++$+++ My happy birthdays here! --[[User:Ginkgo100|Ginkgo100]] <sup>[[User talk:Ginkgo100|''talk'']] \xb7 <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :My happy birthdays here! --[[User:Ginkgo100|Ginkgo100]] <sup>[[User talk:Ginkgo100|''talk'']] · <font color="green">[[User:Ginkgo100/Esperanza|''e@'']]</font></sup> 05:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
536651 +++$+++ Jam01 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536649 +++$+++ 536650 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.163773440E09 +++$+++ Happy birthday! Enjoy your day! [[User:Jam01|Jam]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ ::Happy birthday! Enjoy your day! [[User:Jam01|Jam]]<font color="green">[[User:Jam01/Esperanza|01]]</font> 06:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

274507 +++$+++ Bduke +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-07 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.204882020E09 +++$+++ Hi, Sarah. Thanks for tagging his user and talk page. I should have done it as he has clearly dropped in and then done a runner. -- +++$+++ Hi, Sarah. Thanks for tagging his user and talk page. I should have done it as he has clearly dropped in and then done a runner. --[[User:Bduke|Bduke]] ([[User talk:Bduke|talk]]) 01:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
274508 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274507 +++$+++ 274507 +++$+++ 2008-03-07 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.204883040E09 +++$+++ No worries Brian. I was a little bit concerned about it, that maybe it should be blocked under the Username Policy, but it looks like it isn't necessary since he never came back. Take care,  +++$+++ :No worries Brian. I was a little bit concerned about it, that maybe it should be blocked under the Username Policy, but it looks like it isn't necessary since he never came back. Take care, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

12364 +++$+++ Vintagekits +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-17 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.255809240E09 +++$+++ Hi LC, I have come for two reasons. A. to see if you want to get more involved in the [[WP:BOXING|Boxing Project]]. It's been pretty quiet over there and could do with a NE specialist. B. To see if you could improve the [[Tony Jeffries]] articles. I think he is going to be the next biggest thing in British boxing and it would be good if we had a decent articl on him. I was hoping you could make it your pet articles and improve it now and then? cheers!-- +++$+++ Hi LC, I have come for two reasons. A. to see if you want to get more involved in the [[WP:BOXING|Boxing Project]]. It's been pretty quiet over there and could do with a NE specialist. B. To see if you could improve the [[Tony Jeffries]] articles. I think he is going to be the next biggest thing in British boxing and it would be good if we had a decent articl on him. I was hoping you could make it your pet articles and improve it now and then? cheers!--[[User:Vintagekits|Vintagekits]] ([[User talk:Vintagekits|talk]]) 12:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
12365 +++$+++ Vintagekits +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12364 +++$+++ 12364 +++$+++ 2009-10-17 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.255829700E09 +++$+++ Funny you should bring up Glenn McCrory & Billy Hardy, both got a good airing on Sky Sports last night.-- +++$+++ :Funny you should bring up Glenn McCrory & Billy Hardy, both got a good airing on Sky Sports last night.--[[User:Vintagekits|Vintagekits]] ([[User talk:Vintagekits|talk]]) 18:35, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
12366 +++$+++ Vintagekits +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12364 +++$+++ 12365 +++$+++ 2009-10-17 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.255831260E09 +++$+++ I'd say they will base themselves there - McCory has good high level contacts with the Cubans.-- +++$+++ ::I'd say they will base themselves there - McCory has good high level contacts with the Cubans.--[[User:Vintagekits|Vintagekits]] ([[User talk:Vintagekits|talk]]) 19:01, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
12367 +++$+++ Vintagekits +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12364 +++$+++ 12364 +++$+++ 2009-10-24 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.256413560E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Boxing#Boxers_record|New propsal]].-- +++$+++ *[[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Boxing#Boxers_record|New propsal]].--[[User:Vintagekits|Vintagekits]] ([[User talk:Vintagekits|talk]]) 12:46, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

536653 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-20 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.164019320E09 +++$+++ Well, I... no, I was going to defend myself there, but then I realised that it was pointless. I was just feeling mean ;) <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ Well, I... no, I was going to defend myself there, but then I realised that it was pointless. I was just feeling mean ;) <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 02:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
536654 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536653 +++$+++ 536653 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.164048060E09 +++$+++ Okie dokes, I'm just trying to fix something on the chem portal, and then I'll scoot over there. *breathless with anticipation* <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :Okie dokes, I'm just trying to fix something on the chem portal, and then I'll scoot over there. *breathless with anticipation* <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 10:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
536655 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536653 +++$+++ 536654 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.164050280E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AEditor_review%2FDaveydweeb_2&diff=88991726&oldid=88987455 Reviewed ya]. Lemme know watchufink. <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AEditor_review%2FDaveydweeb_2&diff=88991726&oldid=88987455 Reviewed ya]. Lemme know watchufink. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 11:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
536656 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536653 +++$+++ 536655 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.164052920E09 +++$+++ Well, if you need to find the deletionist cabal, they've been active around anything with the words \"miscellany for deletion\" and \"Esperanza\" in them... tsk tsk, I'm biased. But some things are for the better. <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :::Well, if you need to find the deletionist cabal, they've been active around anything with the words "miscellany for deletion" and "Esperanza" in them... tsk tsk, I'm biased. But some things are for the better. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 12:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
536657 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536653 +++$+++ 536656 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.164053220E09 +++$+++ Oh, but don't you know? They're sneaky buggers... one minute they're at MfD... the next they're at AfD... and everyone in a while, they rear their ugly heads at TfD and CfD... it gives me the heeby jeebies. Hey, when you get a spare minute, take a look at [[Portal:Chemistry]]. I've been giving it a facelift over the past week or so :) <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::::Oh, but don't you know? They're sneaky buggers... one minute they're at MfD... the next they're at AfD... and everyone in a while, they rear their ugly heads at TfD and CfD... it gives me the heeby jeebies. Hey, when you get a spare minute, take a look at [[Portal:Chemistry]]. I've been giving it a facelift over the past week or so :) <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 12:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
536658 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536653 +++$+++ 536657 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.164053760E09 +++$+++ Heh, green on grey is still better than what was there before, it was a kind of black on salmon. Rather boring. So you don't like green on grey, eh? What do you recommend? <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :::::Heh, green on grey is still better than what was there before, it was a kind of black on salmon. Rather boring. So you don't like green on grey, eh? What do you recommend? <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 12:16, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
536659 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536653 +++$+++ 536658 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.164054120E09 +++$+++ Wang, you need to hang around the Village Pump more often, if you haven't heard of [[WP:AES|automatic edit summaries]] ;) Don't worry, it's really new, they've only been using them for the past 3-4 days. <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::::::Wang, you need to hang around the Village Pump more often, if you haven't heard of [[WP:AES|automatic edit summaries]] ;) Don't worry, it's really new, they've only been using them for the past 3-4 days. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 12:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

274510 +++$+++ Avraham +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-07 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.204935240E09 +++$+++ I wanted to personally thank you, Sarah, for your support in my recent RfB. I am thankful and appreciative that you feel that I am worthy of the trust the community requires of its bureaucrats, and I hope to continue to behave in a way that maintains your trust in me and my actions. I have heard the community's voice that they require more of a presence at RfA's of prospective bureaucrats, and I will do my best over the near future to demonstrate such a presence and allow the community to see my philosophy and practices in action. I hope I can continue to count on your support when I decide to once again undergo an RfB. If you have any suggestions, comments, or constructive criticisms, please let me know via talkpage or e-mail., and I look forward to continuing to work with you on [[m:OTRS]]. Thank you again. --  +++$+++ I wanted to personally thank you, Sarah, for your support in my recent RfB. I am thankful and appreciative that you feel that I am worthy of the trust the community requires of its bureaucrats, and I hope to continue to behave in a way that maintains your trust in me and my actions. I have heard the community's voice that they require more of a presence at RfA's of prospective bureaucrats, and I will do my best over the near future to demonstrate such a presence and allow the community to see my philosophy and practices in action. I hope I can continue to count on your support when I decide to once again undergo an RfB. If you have any suggestions, comments, or constructive criticisms, please let me know via talkpage or e-mail., and I look forward to continuing to work with you on [[m:OTRS]]. Thank you again. -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] ([[User talk:Avraham|talk]]) 16:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
274511 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274510 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-07 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.204947060E09 +++$+++ ''For the Mediation Committee,'' <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' <font face="Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</font> 19:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

274512 +++$+++ Blueboy96 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274512 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-08 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.205015580E09 +++$+++ Just for future reference--if the metadata looks suspicious on a picture, it should be spiked per I9?  +++$+++ Just for future reference--if the metadata looks suspicious on a picture, it should be spiked per I9? [[User:Blueboy96|Blueboy]][[User talk:Blueboy96|96]] 14:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
274513 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274512 +++$+++ 274512 +++$+++ 2008-03-08 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.205016000E09 +++$+++ No, not at all. This was just a special case where a serial copyright violator was caught with some images which were demonstrably copyvios (some were found on other websites) so we needed to purge images which we had good cause to believe were copyvios (not all his images were deleted) and I just used I9 in the dropdown log as the closest criteria. I don't think that as a general rule, though, images with funny metadata should be deleted unless we have good reason to think they are copyvios and even then it should be done via the noticeboard for transparency and oversight by others. Cheers,  +++$+++ :No, not at all. This was just a special case where a serial copyright violator was caught with some images which were demonstrably copyvios (some were found on other websites) so we needed to purge images which we had good cause to believe were copyvios (not all his images were deleted) and I just used I9 in the dropdown log as the closest criteria. I don't think that as a general rule, though, images with funny metadata should be deleted unless we have good reason to think they are copyvios and even then it should be done via the noticeboard for transparency and oversight by others. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

12369 +++$+++ Verbal +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-21 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.256181000E09 +++$+++ [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:English Defence League]]. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''The IP edit didn't look like vandalism to me. See [[WP:NOTVAND]]'' <span style=\"font-family:Papyrus\"> +++$+++ [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:English Defence League]]. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''The IP edit didn't look like vandalism to me. See [[WP:NOTVAND]]'' <span style="font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Verbal|<b style="color:#C72">Verbal</b>]] <small>[[User talk:Verbal#top|<span style="color:Gray;">chat</span>]]</small></span> 20:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
12370 +++$+++ Christopher Parham +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12369 +++$+++ 12369 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.256182980E09 +++$+++ See my messages on the article talk page, however, it is probably best to let other users handle these sorts of reversions; technically they are not exempted from 3RR. In general I would avoid at all costs letting yourself be roped into an edit war and get your clean block log sullied. Limiting yourself to one revert a day will improve your reputation and the cost of the article being in a less favorable state for a couple days is minimal.  +++$+++ :See my messages on the article talk page, however, it is probably best to let other users handle these sorts of reversions; technically they are not exempted from 3RR. In general I would avoid at all costs letting yourself be roped into an edit war and get your clean block log sullied. Limiting yourself to one revert a day will improve your reputation and the cost of the article being in a less favorable state for a couple days is minimal. [[User:Christopher Parham|Christopher Parham]] [[User talk:Christopher Parham|(talk)]] 20:43, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

274514 +++$+++ Sonsoftheowl +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274514 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.205344380E09 +++$+++ Hi - an article that I authored - [[M.G.S. Fives]] was recently deleted. Although this was an hoax, it so amused the MGS school archivists that they have requested a copy of the article as it existed immediately prior to deletion. Since you are listed on the list of admins who can provide a deleted article to a userpage, I was wondering if you would be able to do that for me? Many thanks.  +++$+++ Hi - an article that I authored - [[M.G.S. Fives]] was recently deleted. Although this was an hoax, it so amused the MGS school archivists that they have requested a copy of the article as it existed immediately prior to deletion. Since you are listed on the list of admins who can provide a deleted article to a userpage, I was wondering if you would be able to do that for me? Many thanks. [[User:Sonsoftheowl|Sonsoftheowl]] ([[User talk:Sonsoftheowl|talk]]) 10:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
274515 +++$+++ Sonsoftheowl +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274514 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.205435340E09 +++$+++ Without wishing to be rude, the MGS  school archivists are two former members of staff who curate the history of [[Manchester Grammar School]], as the school is almost 500 years old this is a sizeable responsibility. I would ask them to email you themselves, but as they are both at least in their seventies their use of technology is somewhat limited. I would also appreciate it if you were less flippant in future.  +++$+++ ::Without wishing to be rude, the MGS  school archivists are two former members of staff who curate the history of [[Manchester Grammar School]], as the school is almost 500 years old this is a sizeable responsibility. I would ask them to email you themselves, but as they are both at least in their seventies their use of technology is somewhat limited. I would also appreciate it if you were less flippant in future. [[User:Sonsoftheowl|Sonsoftheowl]] ([[User talk:Sonsoftheowl|talk]]) 12:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

12371 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-21 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.256191380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your work, too. Regardless of any policies I disagree with, it looks like there was some bias which was probably unintentional to some extent. The more neutral it is the less knee-jerk reverting by IPs and validity for the project. Blah... sorry to sound so preachy. +++$+++ Thanks for your work, too. Regardless of any policies I disagree with, it looks like there was some bias which was probably unintentional to some extent. The more neutral it is the less knee-jerk reverting by IPs and validity for the project. Blah... sorry to sound so preachy.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 23:03, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
12372 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12371 +++$+++ 12371 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.256191800E09 +++$+++ That is priceless. There is a dispute as to if neutrality is disputed. +++$+++ :That is priceless. There is a dispute as to if neutrality is disputed.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 23:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
12373 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12371 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.256195820E09 +++$+++ The coverage is good enough. We [[Template:Cite episode|cite episode]] for the televised piece. The article already has lower tier sources in an effort to counter punch here in places. This source with such analysis would be a great addition to the article. It has turned into winning and editing without any consideration for NPOV for some. That can't last long and worse comes to worse is easy enough to seek action on. +++$+++ :::The coverage is good enough. We [[Template:Cite episode|cite episode]] for the televised piece. The article already has lower tier sources in an effort to counter punch here in places. This source with such analysis would be a great addition to the article. It has turned into winning and editing without any consideration for NPOV for some. That can't last long and worse comes to worse is easy enough to seek action on.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 00:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
12374 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12371 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 09:48:00 +++$+++ 1.256230080E09 +++$+++ Not all sources need to be available online. [http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/programmes\/newsnight\/8303786.stm] surprisingly works as a link in the Sates, though. I don't know if this will be going down or not but I doubt we will run into any verifiability concerns. It also has a partial transcript. It would be gaming the system to not allow the information.  +++$+++ ::::Not all sources need to be available online. [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/8303786.stm] surprisingly works as a link in the Sates, though. I don't know if this will be going down or not but I doubt we will run into any verifiability concerns. It also has a partial transcript. It would be gaming the system to not allow the information. [[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 09:48, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
12375 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12371 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.256324340E09 +++$+++ Nice work. You actually removed a POV concern (the minor However). It still reads like a counter punch on that line but just a little change like that can make a difference on which if one \"alternative is less favored than another\". +++$+++ ::::::Nice work. You actually removed a POV concern (the minor However). It still reads like a counter punch on that line but just a little change like that can make a difference on which if one "alternative is less favored than another".[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 11:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
12376 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12371 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-24 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.256368380E09 +++$+++ Noticed Geordie on your user page. Oddly enough, I have been following Newcastle since '02. +++$+++ :::::::Noticed Geordie on your user page. Oddly enough, I have been following Newcastle since '02.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 00:13, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
12377 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12371 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-24 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.256369820E09 +++$+++ Sunderland? And I had such a high regard for you! The division is weak this season so SF could get to the playoffs easily. Great town, too. Have a great evening! +++$+++ ::::::::Sunderland? And I had such a high regard for you! The division is weak this season so SF could get to the playoffs easily. Great town, too. Have a great evening![[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 00:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

274516 +++$+++ ClaudeReigns +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274516 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-13 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.205434380E09 +++$+++ And not even a peep at the talk page? I can't help but laugh. I'm not going to 3RR you, I just think it's funny.  +++$+++ And not even a peep at the talk page? I can't help but laugh. I'm not going to 3RR you, I just think it's funny. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 11:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
274517 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274516 +++$+++ 274516 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.205434500E09 +++$+++ Huh? '3RR me' for what????  +++$+++ :Huh? '3RR me' for what???? [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
274518 +++$+++ ClaudeReigns +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274516 +++$+++ 274517 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.205434800E09 +++$+++ Third revert for one side in 24 hours. The significance clearly escapes you.  +++$+++ ::Third revert for one side in 24 hours. The significance clearly escapes you. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 12:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
274519 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274516 +++$+++ 274518 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.205435460E09 +++$+++ You know, it might help if you started with article name and description of edit before you launch into an accusation that someone has violated 3RR. Looking at your recent edits I can only assume this has something to do with YWAM. I'm afraid that you are sadly mistaken. My edit in no way violated 3RR. I didn't even know there was a dispute on that page until approximately one minute ago. I saw the article on my watchlist, looked at the edit, saw it was the addition of a red link and removed it. I can't possibly imagine why you lot are edit warring over a redlink and frankly I care nothing about it and want nothing to do with it. I simply saw what I considered - and still consider - a bad and pointless addition of a link to a non-existent article so I removed it. just because I happen to agree with your opponent, an opinion I reached entirely on my own without even realising a dispute existed, does not place me in 3RR jeopardy. I am not responsible or restricted by the other person's edits and neither them by mine so their edits do not count as mine for 3RR purposes unless I nefariously asked them to revert for me...*blinks*   +++$+++ :::You know, it might help if you started with article name and description of edit before you launch into an accusation that someone has violated 3RR. Looking at your recent edits I can only assume this has something to do with YWAM. I'm afraid that you are sadly mistaken. My edit in no way violated 3RR. I didn't even know there was a dispute on that page until approximately one minute ago. I saw the article on my watchlist, looked at the edit, saw it was the addition of a red link and removed it. I can't possibly imagine why you lot are edit warring over a redlink and frankly I care nothing about it and want nothing to do with it. I simply saw what I considered - and still consider - a bad and pointless addition of a link to a non-existent article so I removed it. just because I happen to agree with your opponent, an opinion I reached entirely on my own without even realising a dispute existed, does not place me in 3RR jeopardy. I am not responsible or restricted by the other person's edits and neither them by mine so their edits do not count as mine for 3RR purposes unless I nefariously asked them to revert for me...*blinks*  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:11, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
274520 +++$+++ ClaudeReigns +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274516 +++$+++ 274519 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.205435880E09 +++$+++ I said I wasn't going to 3RR you. Do you have an interest in YWAM?  +++$+++ ::::I said I wasn't going to 3RR you. Do you have an interest in YWAM? [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 12:18, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
274521 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274516 +++$+++ 274520 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.205437680E09 +++$+++ Not particularly. I have a Dip Min in youth work and thus a general interest in youth outreach programs and ministries. I have many of them on my watchlist but I don't make a lot of edits to such articles except for removing spam and vandalism, correcting typos etc, and if I'd known I was stumbling into a content dispute over a redlink I wouldn't have touched the page.  +++$+++ :::::Not particularly. I have a Dip Min in youth work and thus a general interest in youth outreach programs and ministries. I have many of them on my watchlist but I don't make a lot of edits to such articles except for removing spam and vandalism, correcting typos etc, and if I'd known I was stumbling into a content dispute over a redlink I wouldn't have touched the page. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:48, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
274522 +++$+++ ClaudeReigns +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274516 +++$+++ 274521 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.205469780E09 +++$+++ It goes like this. After the Matthew Murray incident, I included criticisms of YWAM of a secular nature after I had found the main theological arguments had \"disappeared.\" Once I got done sourcing the criticisms, people of course complained about the neutrality of the article--which is best remedied by adding positives. So YWAMers have been dumping old good articles about YWAM at the talk page, which I've been sourcing in the article, since no one else was. The next big positive for the article is The Athens Three, a Freedom of Religion legal case where Greece exhonorated three YWAM missionaries--who other Christians perceive as brave evangelists. I was basically trying to keep that redlink to point out how to further balance the article.  +++$+++ ::::::It goes like this. After the Matthew Murray incident, I included criticisms of YWAM of a secular nature after I had found the main theological arguments had "disappeared." Once I got done sourcing the criticisms, people of course complained about the neutrality of the article--which is best remedied by adding positives. So YWAMers have been dumping old good articles about YWAM at the talk page, which I've been sourcing in the article, since no one else was. The next big positive for the article is The Athens Three, a Freedom of Religion legal case where Greece exhonorated three YWAM missionaries--who other Christians perceive as brave evangelists. I was basically trying to keep that redlink to point out how to further balance the article. [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 21:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

12378 +++$+++ Verbal +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-24 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.256423880E09 +++$+++ I replied on my talk, thanks. I'd not seen that diff before. <span style=\"font-family:Papyrus\"> +++$+++ I replied on my talk, thanks. I'd not seen that diff before. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Verbal|<b style="color:#C72">Verbal</b>]] <small>[[User talk:Verbal#top|<span style="color:Gray;">chat</span>]]</small></span> 15:38, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
12379 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12378 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-24 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.256449020E09 +++$+++ Looks like the results didn't go your way. I thought they were going to equalize at the end there. I'm actually off to the stadium for a handful or two of beers now. I wanted to mention that I do disagree with the amount of quotes and the general layout of the lead but I do applaud your efforts in aiming for neutrality and some bold edits. +++$+++ :::::::::: Looks like the results didn't go your way. I thought they were going to equalize at the end there. I'm actually off to the stadium for a handful or two of beers now. I wanted to mention that I do disagree with the amount of quotes and the general layout of the lead but I do applaud your efforts in aiming for neutrality and some bold edits.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 22:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
12380 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12378 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-24 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.256450220E09 +++$+++ I am upset with myself actually. I made a few edits and got discouraged by the reverts. I'll see what I can do to actually contribute to the content.  +++$+++ ::::::::::: I am upset with myself actually. I made a few edits and got discouraged by the reverts. I'll see what I can do to actually contribute to the content. [[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 22:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

274523 +++$+++ Timeshift9 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-14 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.205482020E09 +++$+++ FYI 3RR violation requires 4 reverts, not 3.  +++$+++ FYI 3RR violation requires 4 reverts, not 3. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 01:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
274524 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274523 +++$+++ 274523 +++$+++ 2008-03-14 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.205533140E09 +++$+++ Hardly matters as Sarah only actually made one revert! What an odd thread... <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Hardly matters as Sarah only actually made one revert! What an odd thread... <font face="Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</font> 15:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
274525 +++$+++ ClaudeReigns +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274523 +++$+++ 274524 +++$+++ 2008-03-14 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.205546220E09 +++$+++ Clearly this is a world rich in humor <nowiki>:|<\/nowiki> Guess I'll just get back into my eggship. Nanoo, nanoo!  +++$+++ ::Clearly this is a world rich in humor <nowiki>:|</nowiki> Guess I'll just get back into my eggship. Nanoo, nanoo! [[User:ClaudeReigns|ClaudeReigns]] ([[User talk:ClaudeReigns|talk]]) 18:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
274526 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274523 +++$+++ 274524 +++$+++ 2008-03-15 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.205566080E09 +++$+++ Hey guys, I think this was just a misunderstanding. Saying to someone \"I won't 3RR you\" says to me, in my regional dialect of English, \"I won't report you for 3RR\". But as I understand, Claude meant \"I won't breach 3RR myself by reverting you\". I think this is just a difference in English dialects. I was a bit irritated at first because I thought Claude was accusing me of breaching 3RR or of proxying for the other guy in a dispute that I didn't even know existed, but I'm pretty sure that s\/he was talking about him\/herself being in 3RR jeopardy if s\/he reverted me. I didn't realise there was a editorial dispute over the link and if I had known I wouldn't have removed it without posting a comment to the talk page. Anyway no hard feelings or anything. Have a nice weekend everyone. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Hey guys, I think this was just a misunderstanding. Saying to someone "I won't 3RR you" says to me, in my regional dialect of English, "I won't report you for 3RR". But as I understand, Claude meant "I won't breach 3RR myself by reverting you". I think this is just a difference in English dialects. I was a bit irritated at first because I thought Claude was accusing me of breaching 3RR or of proxying for the other guy in a dispute that I didn't even know existed, but I'm pretty sure that s/he was talking about him/herself being in 3RR jeopardy if s/he reverted me. I didn't realise there was a editorial dispute over the link and if I had known I wouldn't have removed it without posting a comment to the talk page. Anyway no hard feelings or anything. Have a nice weekend everyone. :) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:28, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

12381 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-26 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.256611200E09 +++$+++ Yeah it was. I was able to catch every NUFC match on one of two channels before they got relegated. Now I have season tickets to the Sounders so it make it a little better. I can't believe the edit war on the tag kept up while I was away.  +++$+++ Yeah it was. I was able to catch every NUFC match on one of two channels before they got relegated. Now I have season tickets to the Sounders so it make it a little better. I can't believe the edit war on the tag kept up while I was away. [[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 19:40, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
12382 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12381 +++$+++ 12381 +++$+++ 2009-10-26 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.256614020E09 +++$+++ I just laid out a long list of my POV concerns. Hopefully this will lead to corrections and not debate on what they are or are not. +++$+++ :I just laid out a long list of my POV concerns. Hopefully this will lead to corrections and not debate on what they are or are not.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 20:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
12383 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12381 +++$+++ 12382 +++$+++ 2009-10-26 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.256614740E09 +++$+++ The general tone of the article is what is getting me. All those things add up. I really just it to say \"they say this, opponents say this, analysts say this\" but that is easier said then done! +++$+++ ::The general tone of the article is what is getting me. All those things add up. I really just it to say "they say this, opponents say this, analysts say this" but that is easier said then done![[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 20:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
12384 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12381 +++$+++ 12383 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.256699280E09 +++$+++ I think I fixed it. August spokesperson said 300 and October (apparently the other guy was no good but I don't recall the source) one said 3,700. Please tinker with it. I added a couple of lines on origin since I like that sort of info. +++$+++ :::I think I fixed it. August spokesperson said 300 and October (apparently the other guy was no good but I don't recall the source) one said 3,700. Please tinker with it. I added a couple of lines on origin since I like that sort of info.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 20:08, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
12385 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12381 +++$+++ 12384 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.256709360E09 +++$+++ <s>The source is the one saying 3700 (Telegraph or Guardian?).<\/s> BRB   Feel free to adjust the wording. The same article was also copied on a BBC website but we already had the other source. The far-right thing to me is a a big issue because as a group it is denied and having that label looks like we are ignoring that. I'm totally OK with saying elements withing the organization are racist and fascist idolizing thugs but as a group they are adamant that that is not what they want as a whole. Making that clear in the lead (both what they say, what is alleged, what individuals are) should be a priority and can be done in two lines. Since adding that much detail might be a flash point I thought the easiest first fix was to copy the wording used in the prose. This would also prevent an ongoing concern from random IPs dropping in. +++$+++ ::::<s>The source is the one saying 3700 (Telegraph or Guardian?).</s> BRB   Feel free to adjust the wording. The same article was also copied on a BBC website but we already had the other source. The far-right thing to me is a a big issue because as a group it is denied and having that label looks like we are ignoring that. I'm totally OK with saying elements withing the organization are racist and fascist idolizing thugs but as a group they are adamant that that is not what they want as a whole. Making that clear in the lead (both what they say, what is alleged, what individuals are) should be a priority and can be done in two lines. Since adding that much detail might be a flash point I thought the easiest first fix was to copy the wording used in the prose. This would also prevent an ongoing concern from random IPs dropping in.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 22:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
12386 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12381 +++$+++ 12385 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.256711760E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Z]]... (sorry for the English variation mistake. The source is [http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/6284184\/The-English-Defence-League-will-the-flames-of-hatred-spread.html] It is already used int he paragraph so I will move it over. +++$+++ :::::Please see [[Z]]... (sorry for the English variation mistake. The source is [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/6284184/The-English-Defence-League-will-the-flames-of-hatred-spread.html] It is already used int he paragraph so I will move it over.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 23:36, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
12387 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12381 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.256713380E09 +++$+++ The kid wasn't in the source? I had a dozen sites open at one so got confused let me find it. I assumed it wasn't important until seeing how much it randomly popped up.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 00:01, 28 October 2009 (UTC) AHA: [http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/uk_news\/magazine\/8250017.stm]. +++$+++ :::::::The kid wasn't in the source? I had a dozen sites open at one so got confused let me find it. I assumed it wasn't important until seeing how much it randomly popped up.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 00:01, 28 October 2009 (UTC) AHA: [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8250017.stm].[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 00:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

274527 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-13 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.205434560E09 +++$+++ Its one of those days - +++$+++ Its one of those days -[[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 11:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
274528 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274527 +++$+++ 274527 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.205435520E09 +++$+++ Gotcha.  +++$+++ :Gotcha. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

274529 +++$+++ Danngarcia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274529 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-14 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.205544540E09 +++$+++ Should we create another case for this or add these sockpuppets to the old discussion? BTW, there is a discussion going on to the [[WP:PINOY|Tambayan Philippines']] [[WT:PINOY#Just a heads up|talk page]]. Thanks!!! - +++$+++ Should we create another case for this or add these sockpuppets to the old discussion? BTW, there is a discussion going on to the [[WP:PINOY|Tambayan Philippines']] [[WT:PINOY#Just a heads up|talk page]]. Thanks!!! -[[User:Danngarcia|Danngarcia]] ([[User talk:Danngarcia|talk]]) 18:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
274530 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274529 +++$+++ 274529 +++$+++ 2008-03-15 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.205564400E09 +++$+++ Great, thanks for letting me know. I've blocked them all and added them to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Gerald Gonzalez]]. I don't think he's going to go away anytime soon, unfortunately, so if you notice more in future that you're sure are his socks just let me know. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Great, thanks for letting me know. I've blocked them all and added them to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Gerald Gonzalez]]. I don't think he's going to go away anytime soon, unfortunately, so if you notice more in future that you're sure are his socks just let me know. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

536674 +++$+++ Spawn Man +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-27 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.164622260E09 +++$+++ I thought you deserved adminship. Please accept my nomination, as I'm sure you will pass with flying colours. You're a good editor Davey, & you'll make a great admin... :)  +++$+++ I thought you deserved adminship. Please accept my nomination, as I'm sure you will pass with flying colours. You're a good editor Davey, & you'll make a great admin... :) [[User:Spawn Man|Spawn Man]] 02:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
536675 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536674 +++$+++ 536674 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.164634620E09 +++$+++ I'm writing up a co-nom now. No way I'm not getting a say in this one :) <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :I'm writing up a co-nom now. No way I'm not getting a say in this one :) <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 05:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
536676 +++$+++ Spawn Man +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536674 +++$+++ 536675 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.164641580E09 +++$+++ When are ya gonna accept? The anticipation is killing me man!!  +++$+++ ::When are ya gonna accept? The anticipation is killing me man!! [[User:Spawn Man|Spawn Man]] 07:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
536677 +++$+++ Spawn Man +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536674 +++$+++ 536674 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.164642600E09 +++$+++ No problemo matey potatey. I just wish I was good enough for people so that I succeeded my first RfA. In anycase, this month has been the best since I started, with nearing 1000 edits. Despite my bad fortune at the beginning I've turned it around. Maybe my good luck will rub off on you now! :)  +++$+++ :No problemo matey potatey. I just wish I was good enough for people so that I succeeded my first RfA. In anycase, this month has been the best since I started, with nearing 1000 edits. Despite my bad fortune at the beginning I've turned it around. Maybe my good luck will rub off on you now! :) [[User:Spawn Man|Spawn Man]] 07:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
536678 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536674 +++$+++ 536676 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.164642720E09 +++$+++ (EC) Done. It took me ''2 hours''?! Well, I better not have done a crappy job, then, what a waste of time ''that'' would be :) <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::: (EC) Done. It took me ''2 hours''?! Well, I better not have done a crappy job, then, what a waste of time ''that'' would be :) <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 07:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
536679 +++$+++ Spawn Man +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536674 +++$+++ 536677 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.164642960E09 +++$+++ It's ''okay'' I guess.... ;) No seriously, that is about as comprehensive as you'll get from what I've seen of DD. Good job...  +++$+++ ::It's ''okay'' I guess.... ;) No seriously, that is about as comprehensive as you'll get from what I've seen of DD. Good job... [[User:Spawn Man|Spawn Man]] 07:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
536680 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536674 +++$+++ 536679 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.164643080E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. <insert emoticons here> <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :::You're welcome. <insert emoticons here> <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 07:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
536681 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536674 +++$+++ 536680 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.164661200E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship\/Daveydweeb&diff=prev&oldid=90417139 Lol]. <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ ::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Daveydweeb&diff=prev&oldid=90417139 Lol]. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 13:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

274531 +++$+++ Chovain +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-18 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.205838180E09 +++$+++ I didn't interpret J Bar's comment as speculating on any editor's location.  J Bar has been accusing the other editor of ownership issues on the article in question.  I interpreted it as a repeat of that accusation, ''not'' a suggestion that another editor (who was not even named in the post), lived there. --  +++$+++ I didn't interpret J Bar's comment as speculating on any editor's location.  J Bar has been accusing the other editor of ownership issues on the article in question.  I interpreted it as a repeat of that accusation, ''not'' a suggestion that another editor (who was not even named in the post), lived there. -- [[User:Chovain|Mark]] [[User talk:Chovain|Chovain]] 04:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
274532 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274531 +++$+++ 274531 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.205840100E09 +++$+++ Of course it's speculating on an editor's location! It is perfectly obvious to anyone who then clicks on the link provided in that comment exactly who J Bar is referring to when he talks about where another editor lives. He is outing what he believes is another editor's location, completely unacceptable on Wikipedia and people get blocked for it. And yes, I'm aware of the bogus accusations of OWNership, but that is completely irrelevant to the issue of speculating about other editor's personal information. Removing poor quality material, poor quality images of numerous shop fronts, information that is a blatant copyright violation, incorrect or not supported by the sources cited isn't a sign of ownership. We're better off having short decent articles than long pieces of crap jammed with copyright vios and poor quality material.  +++$+++ :Of course it's speculating on an editor's location! It is perfectly obvious to anyone who then clicks on the link provided in that comment exactly who J Bar is referring to when he talks about where another editor lives. He is outing what he believes is another editor's location, completely unacceptable on Wikipedia and people get blocked for it. And yes, I'm aware of the bogus accusations of OWNership, but that is completely irrelevant to the issue of speculating about other editor's personal information. Removing poor quality material, poor quality images of numerous shop fronts, information that is a blatant copyright violation, incorrect or not supported by the sources cited isn't a sign of ownership. We're better off having short decent articles than long pieces of crap jammed with copyright vios and poor quality material. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
274533 +++$+++ Chovain +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274531 +++$+++ 274532 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.205845080E09 +++$+++ To the casual observer (which I think I am - I have no reason for taking sides here), it could appear that you are using a block threat to push an editor with an opposing view out of a debate in which you are both involved.  I think it's really important that administrators raise these kind of issues with ''other'' administrators to take appropriate action.  If you see a privacy violation, by all means delete the revision (or just edit it out as I have), but it should be done with the oversight of other administrators if a conflict of interest exists. --  +++$+++ ::To the casual observer (which I think I am - I have no reason for taking sides here), it could appear that you are using a block threat to push an editor with an opposing view out of a debate in which you are both involved.  I think it's really important that administrators raise these kind of issues with ''other'' administrators to take appropriate action.  If you see a privacy violation, by all means delete the revision (or just edit it out as I have), but it should be done with the oversight of other administrators if a conflict of interest exists. -- [[User:Chovain|Mark]] [[User talk:Chovain|Chovain]] 05:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
274534 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274531 +++$+++ 274533 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.205847240E09 +++$+++ I reject all of what you have written above but I thank you for raising your concerns. Thankyou and good night.  +++$+++ :::I reject all of what you have written above but I thank you for raising your concerns. Thankyou and good night. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
274535 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274531 +++$+++ 274534 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.205847900E09 +++$+++ I have reviewed the contributions in question and concluded the same as Sarah - speculation on real world information about Wikipedians is considered to be [[WP:HARASS|harassment]] and in particular is a violation of [[WP:OUTING]]. There have been several well known cases where contributors have been indefinitely blocked in the past for such behaviour, and I would encourage J Bar to not continue to do so. Even so, it's not particularly ''useful'' to speculate, as it is essentially an [[ad hominem]] attack - as the old saying goes, play the ball, not the man.  +++$+++ ::::I have reviewed the contributions in question and concluded the same as Sarah - speculation on real world information about Wikipedians is considered to be [[WP:HARASS|harassment]] and in particular is a violation of [[WP:OUTING]]. There have been several well known cases where contributors have been indefinitely blocked in the past for such behaviour, and I would encourage J Bar to not continue to do so. Even so, it's not particularly ''useful'' to speculate, as it is essentially an [[ad hominem]] attack - as the old saying goes, play the ball, not the man. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 06:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

12388 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-01 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.257135180E09 +++$+++ Woohoo! It is a two legs and home was 0-0 so I was bummed. I somehow ended up doing karaoke at some underground bar with a bunch of Cambodian gangbangers afterwards so it ended up being a good (if not weird) night! +++$+++ Woohoo! It is a two legs and home was 0-0 so I was bummed. I somehow ended up doing karaoke at some underground bar with a bunch of Cambodian gangbangers afterwards so it ended up being a good (if not weird) night![[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 20:13, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
12389 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12388 +++$+++ 12388 +++$+++ 2009-11-01 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.257137160E09 +++$+++ Plenty of games left, of course, but your guys are staying in the hunt for Europe.  +++$+++ :Plenty of games left, of course, but your guys are staying in the hunt for Europe. [[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 20:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
12390 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12388 +++$+++ 12389 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.257846240E09 +++$+++ I was spending too much money every week anyways! Read a great article the other day on how your luck might have been all used up with the beach ball incident. Sounds like your guys are playing well but can't find the back of the net. +++$+++ ::I was spending too much money every week anyways! Read a great article the other day on how your luck might have been all used up with the beach ball incident. Sounds like your guys are playing well but can't find the back of the net.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 01:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

274536 +++$+++ Chovain +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274536 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-18 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.205850420E09 +++$+++ I'm not suggesting that the content should not have been removed, as it could be interpreted as privacy violation.  I'm suggesting that the warning was too harsh given that it was most likely not his intention.  ''He'' believes the other editor is \"owning\" the article.  The veracity of that claim does not affect how his intentions should be interpreted.  You ''clearly'' have a problem with this editor.  You are barely able to go 2 sentences without bringing up claims of \"spamming\" in what you've described as an \"editorial issue\" is the past.  I just feel that the warning should have been issued by an uninvolved administrator.  --  +++$+++ I'm not suggesting that the content should not have been removed, as it could be interpreted as privacy violation.  I'm suggesting that the warning was too harsh given that it was most likely not his intention.  ''He'' believes the other editor is "owning" the article.  The veracity of that claim does not affect how his intentions should be interpreted.  You ''clearly'' have a problem with this editor.  You are barely able to go 2 sentences without bringing up claims of "spamming" in what you've described as an "editorial issue" is the past.  I just feel that the warning should have been issued by an uninvolved administrator.  -- [[User:Chovain|Mark]] [[User talk:Chovain|Chovain]] 07:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
274537 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274536 +++$+++ 274536 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.205851620E09 +++$+++ Hehehe. Of course it was his intention to post that information. Another administrator has looked at it and reached the same conclusion as I. I think you're very confused Mark and you seem to be confusing various different issues. Spamming is not simply an \"editorial issue\" and if you think I said such a thing I would urge you to go back and look at the context, because spamming is largely an administrative issue. I did say that issue of selection of images was an editorial decision but spamming is something else altogether and I believe that you are profoundly muddled. Please stop posting on my talk page as you are not adding any light but rather confusion and incorrect information, right from your very first sentence in this section in which you claimed incorrectly that J Bar had not posted speculation regarding another editor's location. Thank you kindly.  +++$+++ :Hehehe. Of course it was his intention to post that information. Another administrator has looked at it and reached the same conclusion as I. I think you're very confused Mark and you seem to be confusing various different issues. Spamming is not simply an "editorial issue" and if you think I said such a thing I would urge you to go back and look at the context, because spamming is largely an administrative issue. I did say that issue of selection of images was an editorial decision but spamming is something else altogether and I believe that you are profoundly muddled. Please stop posting on my talk page as you are not adding any light but rather confusion and incorrect information, right from your very first sentence in this section in which you claimed incorrectly that J Bar had not posted speculation regarding another editor's location. Thank you kindly. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
274538 +++$+++ J Bar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274536 +++$+++ 274537 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.205901000E09 +++$+++ G'Day Sarah. I have never intended to intimidate or harass anyone on wikipedia and if I have then I apologise. I have made many, many contributions on other Sydney suburb articles over the last couple of years and if you have a look, you would see that my contributions have always been positive. I have spent a lot of time and effort trying to remove vandalism from so many articles. I became frustrated by the constant reverts and deleted contributions from all other editors on that particular article. As I said, no offence or harassment was ever intended and I regret that this situation has got out of hand because it prevents other editors from making a contribution. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::G'Day Sarah. I have never intended to intimidate or harass anyone on wikipedia and if I have then I apologise. I have made many, many contributions on other Sydney suburb articles over the last couple of years and if you have a look, you would see that my contributions have always been positive. I have spent a lot of time and effort trying to remove vandalism from so many articles. I became frustrated by the constant reverts and deleted contributions from all other editors on that particular article. As I said, no offence or harassment was ever intended and I regret that this situation has got out of hand because it prevents other editors from making a contribution. Cheers. [[User:J Bar|J Bar]] ([[User talk:J Bar|talk]]) 21:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
274539 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274536 +++$+++ 274538 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.205904660E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I accept what you've said but please be careful that you dont ever speculate about other people's personal information, even if you see it posted somewhere by someone else. This really has nothing to do with the Mosman article or any other article and the idea that you are a \"thorn in my side\" is utterly ludicrous given that we rarely edit the same pages. I was contacted as an Australian admin by someone who had seen your post and I was asked to review it. People have been blocked straight away for posting speculated personal information, so please be careful in future.  +++$+++ :::Thank you, I accept what you've said but please be careful that you dont ever speculate about other people's personal information, even if you see it posted somewhere by someone else. This really has nothing to do with the Mosman article or any other article and the idea that you are a "thorn in my side" is utterly ludicrous given that we rarely edit the same pages. I was contacted as an Australian admin by someone who had seen your post and I was asked to review it. People have been blocked straight away for posting speculated personal information, so please be careful in future. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 22:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

12393 +++$+++ Snowded +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-25 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.256516400E09 +++$+++ (Oh and Liverpool beat Man United so in an all round good mood -- +++$+++ (Oh and Liverpool beat Man United so in an all round good mood --[[User:Snowded|<font color="#801818" face="Papyrus">'''Snowded'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Snowded#top|<font color="#708090" face="Baskerville">TALK</font>]]</sup></small>  17:20, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
12394 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12393 +++$+++ 12393 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.256669100E09 +++$+++ Re your message on my talk page - the problem I have is simply with grammar, and readability.  It reads badly to cram too many thoughts into the first sentence, just because some people think \"the first sentence\" is particularly important.  I'll have another look at it, probably later today - otherwise occupied at the moment.  I'll keep monitoring the NPOV issue as well, but will try and keep away from unproductive discussions (not your fault, I think).   +++$+++ :Re your message on my talk page - the problem I have is simply with grammar, and readability.  It reads badly to cram too many thoughts into the first sentence, just because some people think "the first sentence" is particularly important.  I'll have another look at it, probably later today - otherwise occupied at the moment.  I'll keep monitoring the NPOV issue as well, but will try and keep away from unproductive discussions (not your fault, I think).  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 11:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

12396 +++$+++ WFCforLife +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12396 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-30 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.256933340E09 +++$+++ It's a fair point. I've justified what I did (which admittedly I should have done first) and declared that I'm going to wait before persisting in reverting, as the content is sourced. However, I do feel that I was right to revert. That section was better written as of Toon05's last revision than it was in Trident's first revision. There was nothing to stop Trident working his subsequent bullets into the prose. And while I understand what you're saying about me turning the list into prose, I don't feel that having seen a reasonably-written section turned into a list of arguably over-specific information that I would be best placed to copyedit it- I would be tempted to remove \"unnecessary\" parts of it, and the work would most likely be reverted.  +++$+++ It's a fair point. I've justified what I did (which admittedly I should have done first) and declared that I'm going to wait before persisting in reverting, as the content is sourced. However, I do feel that I was right to revert. That section was better written as of Toon05's last revision than it was in Trident's first revision. There was nothing to stop Trident working his subsequent bullets into the prose. And while I understand what you're saying about me turning the list into prose, I don't feel that having seen a reasonably-written section turned into a list of arguably over-specific information that I would be best placed to copyedit it- I would be tempted to remove "unnecessary" parts of it, and the work would most likely be reverted. [[User:WFCforLife|WFCforLife]] ([[User talk:WFCforLife|talk]]) 13:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
12397 +++$+++ WFCforLife +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12396 +++$+++ 12396 +++$+++ 2009-10-31 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.257045300E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I was getting a bit stressed, thought I'd do something constructive.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I was getting a bit stressed, thought I'd do something constructive. [[User:WFCforLife|WFCforLife]] ([[User talk:WFCforLife|talk]]) 20:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
12398 +++$+++ WFCforLife +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12396 +++$+++ 12397 +++$+++ 2009-10-31 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.257046440E09 +++$+++ From what I've been told we weren't actually ''that'' bad, which I find hard to believe. Still, we're doing better than I expected considering we sold our top two scorers, our best defender and our only other winger. Could be worse, could be Luton :)  +++$+++ ::From what I've been told we weren't actually ''that'' bad, which I find hard to believe. Still, we're doing better than I expected considering we sold our top two scorers, our best defender and our only other winger. Could be worse, could be Luton :) [[User:WFCforLife|WFCforLife]] ([[User talk:WFCforLife|talk]]) 20:34, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

536685 +++$+++ Casey Abell +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-28 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.164762480E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to give you a heads-up that I included a report on your ''Wikipedia Weekly'' comments about Citizendium in the [[Citizendium|CZ article]]. I tried to quote you accurately and fairly. I must caution that Larry Sanger has questioned my fairness on the article's talk page, so I tried to be as scrupulously even-handed as possible. Without public access to the pilot wiki, I have to rely on reports from editors like you who do have access. Thanks!  +++$+++ Just wanted to give you a heads-up that I included a report on your ''Wikipedia Weekly'' comments about Citizendium in the [[Citizendium|CZ article]]. I tried to quote you accurately and fairly. I must caution that Larry Sanger has questioned my fairness on the article's talk page, so I tried to be as scrupulously even-handed as possible. Without public access to the pilot wiki, I have to rely on reports from editors like you who do have access. Thanks! [[User:Casey Abell|Casey Abell]] 17:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
536686 +++$+++ Casey Abell +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536685 +++$+++ 536685 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.164785940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the kind reply, David. I have corroborated some of your comments - about the growing volume of CZ users and edits, for instance - with quotes from Larry in the article. I regularly read the CZ blog, mailing list and forums, and I'll look for any more published corroboration. And yes, I do consider you a reliable source, especially because your remarks about CZ seemed balanced and well-considered. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the kind reply, David. I have corroborated some of your comments - about the growing volume of CZ users and edits, for instance - with quotes from Larry in the article. I regularly read the CZ blog, mailing list and forums, and I'll look for any more published corroboration. And yes, I do consider you a reliable source, especially because your remarks about CZ seemed balanced and well-considered. Thanks again. [[User:Casey Abell|Casey Abell]] 23:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

12399 +++$+++ The Four Deuces +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12399 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-30 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.256960040E09 +++$+++ You have cherry-picked information from the the UAF website to present them as a leftist organization although they clearly state \"We aim to unite the broadest possible spectrum of society to counter this threat.\"  That is original research.  You recently posted at RSN asking whether the website was RS.  As I mentioned there you should use mainstream press as a source.   +++$+++ You have cherry-picked information from the the UAF website to present them as a leftist organization although they clearly state "We aim to unite the broadest possible spectrum of society to counter this threat."  That is original research.  You recently posted at RSN asking whether the website was RS.  As I mentioned there you should use mainstream press as a source.  [[User:The Four Deuces|The Four Deuces]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 20:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
12400 +++$+++ The Four Deuces +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12399 +++$+++ 12399 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.256961660E09 +++$+++ Since Labour and SWP parties are mentioned, mentioning the Conservative Party and Ulster Unionist Party makes if more clear that their membership is broadly based.  The Labour and Conservative Parties are btw the two major political parties in the UK so it is unbalanced to mention only one.  I would point out that where sections are poorly sourced, you should find better sources.  Your new version as I said is poorly sourced and distorts the views presented in the source.   +++$+++ :Since Labour and SWP parties are mentioned, mentioning the Conservative Party and Ulster Unionist Party makes if more clear that their membership is broadly based.  The Labour and Conservative Parties are btw the two major political parties in the UK so it is unbalanced to mention only one.  I would point out that where sections are poorly sourced, you should find better sources.  Your new version as I said is poorly sourced and distorts the views presented in the source.  [[User:The Four Deuces|The Four Deuces]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 21:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

274544 +++$+++ Stephen +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-21 08:37:00 +++$+++ 1.206113820E09 +++$+++ Hi, someone you blocked a month ago for sock violations is requesting an unblock [[User talk:NewYorkDreams|over here]]. -- +++$+++ Hi, someone you blocked a month ago for sock violations is requesting an unblock [[User talk:NewYorkDreams|over here]]. --[[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 08:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
274545 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274544 +++$+++ 274544 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.206117720E09 +++$+++ Thanks Stephen. That user is Eddie Segoura (see the list of banned users) and the account should not be unblocked. He knows he has to go through ArbCom to appeal his ban and he currently has an appeal before them so I'm not sure why he's pulling this now.  +++$+++ :Thanks Stephen. That user is Eddie Segoura (see the list of banned users) and the account should not be unblocked. He knows he has to go through ArbCom to appeal his ban and he currently has an appeal before them so I'm not sure why he's pulling this now. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
274546 +++$+++ Stephen +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274544 +++$+++ 274545 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.206197340E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I knew you'd have all the answers.  I didn't have time to dig deeper last night, and I was a little concerned he was asking for a specific admin to step in and unblock. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks, I knew you'd have all the answers.  I didn't have time to dig deeper last night, and I was a little concerned he was asking for a specific admin to step in and unblock. --[[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 07:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

12401 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-03 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.257317160E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=323778379&oldid=323778313] - I have been known as the \"Wiki Satan\" since August 2008. I thought that might interest you. :)  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=323778379&oldid=323778313] - I have been known as the "Wiki Satan" since August 2008. I thought that might interest you. :) [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 22:46, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
12402 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12401 +++$+++ 12401 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.257317640E09 +++$+++ I laughed when I read that. I've heard myself described like that before. By the way, I chose [[User:Coriolanus]] as my open access title because of the way people declare I am. I thought that was rather amusing. :)  +++$+++ :I laughed when I read that. I've heard myself described like that before. By the way, I chose [[User:Coriolanus]] as my open access title because of the way people declare I am. I thought that was rather amusing. :) [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 22:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
12403 +++$+++ Pointillist +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12401 +++$+++ 12402 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.257318300E09 +++$+++ Hi Leaky, I thought your caesarean section came across very well, too. You might not gain further ground in an encore, so perhaps ''exeunt omnes'' is the best approach for the time being, if you see what I mean...:-) -  +++$+++ :: Hi Leaky, I thought your caesarean section came across very well, too. You might not gain further ground in an encore, so perhaps ''exeunt omnes'' is the best approach for the time being, if you see what I mean...:-) - [[User:Pointillist|Pointillist]] ([[User talk:Pointillist|talk]]) 23:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

536690 +++$+++ Natalya +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-02 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.165061460E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, I am micless, so I will have to decline your offer.  I hope all goes well.  One thing to remember - regardless of who you have talking about both \"sides\", people only represent their own viewpoints, and not the viewpoints of an entire group. -- [[User:Natalya|Nataly]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ Unfortunately, I am micless, so I will have to decline your offer.  I hope all goes well.  One thing to remember - regardless of who you have talking about both "sides", people only represent their own viewpoints, and not the viewpoints of an entire group. -- [[User:Natalya|Nataly]]<font color="green">[[User:Natalya/Esperanza|a]]</font> 04:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
536691 +++$+++ EWS23 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536690 +++$+++ 536690 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.165104720E09 +++$+++ I apologize for the lateness of this reply, but unfortunately I will not be able to attend either, due to a variety of factors including quite a busy schedule [[IRL]]. However, I am honored that you would invite me, and under normal circumstances and perhaps a different topic I would definitely consider being on the show. I hope it goes great, and let me know if there's anything I can do for you in the future, podcast-wise or other-wise. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I apologize for the lateness of this reply, but unfortunately I will not be able to attend either, due to a variety of factors including quite a busy schedule [[IRL]]. However, I am honored that you would invite me, and under normal circumstances and perhaps a different topic I would definitely consider being on the show. I hope it goes great, and let me know if there's anything I can do for you in the future, podcast-wise or other-wise. Cheers, [[User:EWS23|<font color="green">'''EWS23'''</font>]] ([[User talk:EWS23|Leave me a message!]]) 16:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

274547 +++$+++ Howard the Duck +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-24 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.206377220E09 +++$+++ See [[User:Xhxwreign]]. Also [[User:I Love You!!!\u2122]]. See also [[User:Angelians]]. --''' +++$+++ See [[User:Xhxwreign]]. Also [[User:I Love You!!!™]]. See also [[User:Angelians]]. --'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">Howard</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">the</font>]] [[User talk:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">Duck</font>]]''' 09:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
274548 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274547 +++$+++ 274547 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.206699720E09 +++$+++ Okiedokey, looking at them now. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Okiedokey, looking at them now. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
274549 +++$+++ Lenticel +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274547 +++$+++ 274548 +++$+++ 2008-03-31 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.206961560E09 +++$+++ Another [[User:Certified_Angelians|one]] trolling at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of Angel Locsin's Commercials and Endorsements]] -- +++$+++ :: Another [[User:Certified_Angelians|one]] trolling at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Angel Locsin's Commercials and Endorsements]] --[[User:Lenticel|<span style="color: teal; background: white; font-weight: bold">Lenticel</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Lenticel|<span style="color: green; font-weight: bold">talk</span>]])</sup> 04:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
274550 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274547 +++$+++ 274549 +++$+++ 2008-03-31 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.206964560E09 +++$+++ +sigh+ Okay, I've blocked that one, the other account  +++$+++ :::+sigh+ Okay, I've blocked that one, the other account [[User:Zhwrxtvstymzaldrest]] and disabled account creation on one of Gerald's IPs. Thanks, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:56, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

12404 +++$+++ Leaky_caldron +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-05 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.257444300E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ Regards, [[User:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 9pt kristen itc">Leaky </span>]][[User talk:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Grey;font:bold 9pt kristen itc">Caldron</span>]] 10:05, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
12405 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12404 +++$+++ 12404 +++$+++ 2009-11-05 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.257460260E09 +++$+++ Send the consent, including the exact names of all the affected images, to permissions-en{{@}}wikimedia.org.  +++$+++ :Send the consent, including the exact names of all the affected images, to permissions-en{{@}}wikimedia.org. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 14:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
12406 +++$+++ Leaky_caldron +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12404 +++$+++ 12405 +++$+++ 2009-11-05 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.257460440E09 +++$+++ thanks. will do.  +++$+++ ::thanks. will do. [[User:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 9pt kristen itc">Leaky </span>]][[User talk:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Grey;font:bold 9pt kristen itc">Caldron</span>]] 14:34, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
12407 +++$+++ Leaky_caldron +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12404 +++$+++ 12405 +++$+++ 2009-11-07 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.257643920E09 +++$+++ Hi again. I did as you suggested and sent an email a couple of days ago. What happens next?  +++$+++ ::Hi again. I did as you suggested and sent an email a couple of days ago. What happens next? [[User:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 9pt kristen itc">Leaky </span>]][[User talk:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Grey;font:bold 9pt kristen itc">Caldron</span>]] 17:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
12408 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12404 +++$+++ 12407 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.257915360E09 +++$+++ All the emails are queued and answered in the order received. There's a backlog of over 2 weeks at the moment, though...  +++$+++ :::All the emails are queued and answered in the order received. There's a backlog of over 2 weeks at the moment, though... [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 20:56, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

274551 +++$+++ Damuna +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274551 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-24 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.206386640E09 +++$+++ I don't suppose you'd like to help with these matters? -- +++$+++ I don't suppose you'd like to help with these matters? --[[User:Damuna|Muna]] ([[User talk:Damuna|talk]]) 12:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
274552 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274551 +++$+++ 274551 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.206705720E09 +++$+++ Hey Muna, sorry for the delay replying but I have been away for Easter. I'm not really the best person to ask about this because computer games really aren't my forte and, to be honest, I really do not know if Horus is a notable character in Warhammer 40,000. However, looking at the article's talk page and the project's talk page, no one has raised any objections to adding Horus and even Darkson says he thinks it should be included. Therefore, I think you would be well within your rights to restore your listing of Horus. I think you could do the same with Slaanesh's legion - just explain what you said above on the talk page, wait a few days and if no one objects or raises any concerns then just add it back in with an edit summary like \"adding Slaanesh's legion per talk page\". I put the page on my watchlist and will keep an eye on it but at this stage I'm not sure there is anything much I can do since people basically seem to agree that Horus should be included. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hey Muna, sorry for the delay replying but I have been away for Easter. I'm not really the best person to ask about this because computer games really aren't my forte and, to be honest, I really do not know if Horus is a notable character in Warhammer 40,000. However, looking at the article's talk page and the project's talk page, no one has raised any objections to adding Horus and even Darkson says he thinks it should be included. Therefore, I think you would be well within your rights to restore your listing of Horus. I think you could do the same with Slaanesh's legion - just explain what you said above on the talk page, wait a few days and if no one objects or raises any concerns then just add it back in with an edit summary like "adding Slaanesh's legion per talk page". I put the page on my watchlist and will keep an eye on it but at this stage I'm not sure there is anything much I can do since people basically seem to agree that Horus should be included. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:02, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
274553 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274551 +++$+++ 274551 +++$+++ 2008-03-31 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.206989820E09 +++$+++ I've continued to edit this article tonight, and the whole time I had a sneaking suspicion I was re-covering old ground, and fixing problems previously fixed. Until I saw [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=John_Wayne_Glover&diff=194574991&oldid=194491968 this edit] on 28th Feb. It is a blind, unexplained revert to a version in December as evidence by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=John_Wayne_Glover&diff=194574991&oldid=174994718 this diff]. You reverted back 45 versions, and through 7 non-anon editors, following a number of changes that you outwardly to an early version close to your original without explanation. Could you explain this now please? -- +++$+++ :I've continued to edit this article tonight, and the whole time I had a sneaking suspicion I was re-covering old ground, and fixing problems previously fixed. Until I saw [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Wayne_Glover&diff=194574991&oldid=194491968 this edit] on 28th Feb. It is a blind, unexplained revert to a version in December as evidence by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Wayne_Glover&diff=194574991&oldid=174994718 this diff]. You reverted back 45 versions, and through 7 non-anon editors, following a number of changes that you outwardly to an early version close to your original without explanation. Could you explain this now please? --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 11:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

536696 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536696 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-02 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.165097280E09 +++$+++ sok I just banninate all of internet, then no phat lewt for j00! [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ sok I just banninate all of internet, then no phat lewt for j00! [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Daveydweeb 2|'''review!''']]</sub></small>) 14:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
536697 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536696 +++$+++ 536696 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.165097400E09 +++$+++ ... Too much stupid for me, sorry. :p <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :... Too much stupid for me, sorry. :p <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 14:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
536698 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536696 +++$+++ 536697 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.165097460E09 +++$+++ ;_; Just you wait, little miss. History will vindi-ma-cate me. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ :: ;_; Just you wait, little miss. History will vindi-ma-cate me. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Daveydweeb 2|'''review!''']]</sub></small>) 14:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
536699 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536696 +++$+++ 536698 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.165097580E09 +++$+++ I don't doubt it ^^ OK, I'm off to do something useful. I think. I'll try. <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :::I don't doubt it ^^ OK, I'm off to do something useful. I think. I'll try. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 14:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
536700 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536696 +++$+++ 536699 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.165097640E09 +++$+++ Me too, I'm off to... uh, record a podcast. Yay. >.> <small>Why so few replies at ''your'' talk page? I must be ill.<\/small> [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::::Me too, I'm off to... uh, record a podcast. Yay. >.> <small>Why so few replies at ''your'' talk page? I must be ill.</small> [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Daveydweeb 2|'''review!''']]</sub></small>) 14:14, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
536701 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536696 +++$+++ 536700 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.165097940E09 +++$+++ I know, I misses the orange bar :( Although the one before yours was ''another'' RfA nom. \/me feels loved :p <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :::::I know, I misses the orange bar :( Although the one before yours was ''another'' RfA nom. /me feels loved :p <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 14:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

12409 +++$+++ Wildhartlivie +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-07 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.257641100E09 +++$+++ First of all, I find ''nothing'' on the article talk page where the odd formatting was first proposed, widely discussed and ''agreed on'' before it was used. What I find is discussion after the fact and comments that it is an odd reference style, but again, no consensus to keep it. I do not see that particular style recommended in Wikipedia citation guidelines or policies. I do not see an imbedded note on the article page indicating that a new style of referencing is being used, or that editors agreed on it. So when someone comes into the article and discovers a reference link is dead, and finds something entirely odd and slightly insane in appearance, it is not unheard of for it to be changed. I'd be entirely grateful if someone would point out the Wikipedia reference guidelines or policies that suggest that this odd style is now accepted for referencing. Frankly, I don't care if it ruffles someone's feathers, ''why'' would anyone try to institute a format of referencing that isn't used here and do so without notating it somewhere in the article, especially since no one had a problem with imbedding notes not to use photographs not related to the shooting or that this isn't technically a massacre. It seems to me that ''a mention'' of the reference style being used from another version from Wikimedia but not this one might come to mind to ''someone''.  +++$+++ First of all, I find ''nothing'' on the article talk page where the odd formatting was first proposed, widely discussed and ''agreed on'' before it was used. What I find is discussion after the fact and comments that it is an odd reference style, but again, no consensus to keep it. I do not see that particular style recommended in Wikipedia citation guidelines or policies. I do not see an imbedded note on the article page indicating that a new style of referencing is being used, or that editors agreed on it. So when someone comes into the article and discovers a reference link is dead, and finds something entirely odd and slightly insane in appearance, it is not unheard of for it to be changed. I'd be entirely grateful if someone would point out the Wikipedia reference guidelines or policies that suggest that this odd style is now accepted for referencing. Frankly, I don't care if it ruffles someone's feathers, ''why'' would anyone try to institute a format of referencing that isn't used here and do so without notating it somewhere in the article, especially since no one had a problem with imbedding notes not to use photographs not related to the shooting or that this isn't technically a massacre. It seems to me that ''a mention'' of the reference style being used from another version from Wikimedia but not this one might come to mind to ''someone''. [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 16:45, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
12410 +++$+++ Wildhartlivie +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12409 +++$+++ 12409 +++$+++ 2009-11-07 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.257649680E09 +++$+++ Yup, it's a discussion, after the fact, and about 2 1\/4 hours after the article was created. As I said, I find ''nothing'' on the article talk page where the odd formatting was first proposed, widely discussed and ''agreed on'' <u>before<\/u> it was used. And I'm not aware that before editing a page, editors need to go searching out the talk page to see if someone is trying out something new and not in the recommended styles of citation. I'm still not seeing a guideline or policy that suggests, recommends, even ''notes'' this odd style of referencing, nor any indication of support on Wikipedia for instituting the use of it. I notice you skipped right over every point I made, and that's fine, but don't come and lecture me and insinuate that I made a mistake. The mistake was in implementing an irregular style of reference formatting without so much as a courtesy imbedded note explaining it for the other 200 or so editors on the page besides the 8 that were aware of and responded to the talk page discussion. I wonder how many of them were aware someone was trying out a new method of citation.  +++$+++ :Yup, it's a discussion, after the fact, and about 2 1/4 hours after the article was created. As I said, I find ''nothing'' on the article talk page where the odd formatting was first proposed, widely discussed and ''agreed on'' <u>before</u> it was used. And I'm not aware that before editing a page, editors need to go searching out the talk page to see if someone is trying out something new and not in the recommended styles of citation. I'm still not seeing a guideline or policy that suggests, recommends, even ''notes'' this odd style of referencing, nor any indication of support on Wikipedia for instituting the use of it. I notice you skipped right over every point I made, and that's fine, but don't come and lecture me and insinuate that I made a mistake. The mistake was in implementing an irregular style of reference formatting without so much as a courtesy imbedded note explaining it for the other 200 or so editors on the page besides the 8 that were aware of and responded to the talk page discussion. I wonder how many of them were aware someone was trying out a new method of citation. [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 19:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

274555 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274555 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-02 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.207124280E09 +++$+++ Back from O\/S for a couple of days now.  Thanks for maintaining a watch. Cheers and best wishes.-- +++$+++ Back from O/S for a couple of days now.  Thanks for maintaining a watch. Cheers and best wishes.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 01:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
274556 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274555 +++$+++ 274555 +++$+++ 2008-04-02 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.207124460E09 +++$+++ Cool, hope you had a great trip. I had some time off for Easter and so my \"watch\" dropped off a bit around then. Anyway, glad to see you back now, Steve. Take care,  +++$+++ :Cool, hope you had a great trip. I had some time off for Easter and so my "watch" dropped off a bit around then. Anyway, glad to see you back now, Steve. Take care, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

274557 +++$+++ Anwar saadat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274557 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-02 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.207186860E09 +++$+++ I was in the middle of editing this article when it was tagged for speedy deletion by [[User:RnB]]. There was no notice, nothing. The article was deleted even while I was adding references. He obviously mistook the legal markup of the agreement as ''patent nonsense''. Can you please restore it? +++$+++ I was in the middle of editing this article when it was tagged for speedy deletion by [[User:RnB]]. There was no notice, nothing. The article was deleted even while I was adding references. He obviously mistook the legal markup of the agreement as ''patent nonsense''. Can you please restore it?[[User:Anwar saadat|Anwar]] ([[User talk:Anwar saadat|talk]]) 18:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
274558 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274557 +++$+++ 274557 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.207207020E09 +++$+++ Hey Anwar. I would give you a copy of the deleted content but I won't restore the article because I agree with Nawlin. I don't think it was an encyclopedic article and it seems more like something that should be posted to one of the other sites already suggested to you. You could write an article on Anti-Gazumping Agreement like [[Australian Workplace Agreement]] but I don't believe the actual agreement text is appropriate as an article on its own. If you want a copy of it to use elsewhere then let me know and I will give it to you but if you try to post it to the mainspace again it will just get speedied again. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hey Anwar. I would give you a copy of the deleted content but I won't restore the article because I agree with Nawlin. I don't think it was an encyclopedic article and it seems more like something that should be posted to one of the other sites already suggested to you. You could write an article on Anti-Gazumping Agreement like [[Australian Workplace Agreement]] but I don't believe the actual agreement text is appropriate as an article on its own. If you want a copy of it to use elsewhere then let me know and I will give it to you but if you try to post it to the mainspace again it will just get speedied again. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

12414 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12414 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-25 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.259210760E09 +++$+++ Cool, I support your edits there.  +++$+++ Cool, I support your edits there. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 20:46, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
12415 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12414 +++$+++ 12414 +++$+++ 2009-11-25 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.259211300E09 +++$+++ Me neither, I like an article to be quality and informative in a neutral way, what makes me angry is when someone comes to an article to attack the subject because they don't like them..that is so not the point of what wikipedia is, anyway, I'll restrict my rant, regards.  +++$+++ :Me neither, I like an article to be quality and informative in a neutral way, what makes me angry is when someone comes to an article to attack the subject because they don't like them..that is so not the point of what wikipedia is, anyway, I'll restrict my rant, regards. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 20:55, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
12416 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12414 +++$+++ 12415 +++$+++ 2009-11-25 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.259211780E09 +++$+++ There are indeed, barstards!  +++$+++ ::There are indeed, barstards! [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 21:03, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
12417 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12414 +++$+++ 12416 +++$+++ 2009-11-25 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.259215860E09 +++$+++ I was watchin with respect, very bold and much improved.  +++$+++ :::I was watchin with respect, very bold and much improved. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 22:11, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
12418 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12414 +++$+++ 12417 +++$+++ 2009-11-25 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.259216520E09 +++$+++ I noticed that, about 15 edits and only a couple of hundred bytes diff, I was looking a bit more and it is really very readable now, real good work.  +++$+++ ::::I noticed that, about 15 edits and only a couple of hundred bytes diff, I was looking a bit more and it is really very readable now, real good work. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 22:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
12419 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12414 +++$+++ 12418 +++$+++ 2009-11-25 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.259217000E09 +++$+++ Scotland and NI, I have never edited there but I can imagine, articles that are intense as those will never be any good, I think we met on that EDL article, those locations are like training grounds, and then you look around and find an article and it is easy to work on, enjoyable, and whereas any work you do on those hotly contested articles will last about a day, good easy work that lasts is much more rewarding, regards.  +++$+++ :::::Scotland and NI, I have never edited there but I can imagine, articles that are intense as those will never be any good, I think we met on that EDL article, those locations are like training grounds, and then you look around and find an article and it is easy to work on, enjoyable, and whereas any work you do on those hotly contested articles will last about a day, good easy work that lasts is much more rewarding, regards. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 22:30, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

395285 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ 395285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-15 07:31:00 +++$+++ 1.308148260E09 +++$+++ Thanks, -- +++$+++ Thanks, --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 07:31, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
395286 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ 395285 +++$+++ 395285 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.308149400E09 +++$+++ Yes, I saw your post on the editing trends talk page. You probably want [[WP:BOTREQ]] or the [[tswiki:Query service]]. Unfortunately I don't have time for such an in-depth analysis, particularly as autoconfirmed is an implicit state, not an explicit group, so you'll have to calculate it at fixed points in time using historical data. You have other metrics that you're using (\"constructive edits,\" specific block reasons, and article wizardy) that also can't easily be measured by a script or query. I don't imagine there will be anyone who's capable of gathering the type of stats you're interested in. I imagine you'll have to either do it yourself or find simpler metrics. (And, personally, I think the page creation limitations are a bit silly. If you can edit, you should be able to create.) -- +++$+++ :Yes, I saw your post on the editing trends talk page. You probably want [[WP:BOTREQ]] or the [[tswiki:Query service]]. Unfortunately I don't have time for such an in-depth analysis, particularly as autoconfirmed is an implicit state, not an explicit group, so you'll have to calculate it at fixed points in time using historical data. You have other metrics that you're using ("constructive edits," specific block reasons, and article wizardy) that also can't easily be measured by a script or query. I don't imagine there will be anyone who's capable of gathering the type of stats you're interested in. I imagine you'll have to either do it yourself or find simpler metrics. (And, personally, I think the page creation limitations are a bit silly. If you can edit, you should be able to create.) --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride#top|talk]]) 07:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
395287 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ 395285 +++$+++ 395286 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308151320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the feedback  and advice. We  have to  do  this trial  because it was called for by  a clear consensus for the change. I  agree that  the metrics are complex, but  I  didn't  make them up, they  too  were called for by  the community. Personally  I  would be satisfied  with comparisons of the number of new articles kept against  the number that  get  deleted, before and after the trial, and if the new rule would really  scare the wrong people off.   +++$+++ ::Thanks for the feedback  and advice. We  have to  do  this trial  because it was called for by  a clear consensus for the change. I  agree that  the metrics are complex, but  I  didn't  make them up, they  too  were called for by  the community. Personally  I  would be satisfied  with comparisons of the number of new articles kept against  the number that  get  deleted, before and after the trial, and if the new rule would really  scare the wrong people off.  [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 08:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
395288 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ 395285 +++$+++ 395287 +++$+++ 2011-06-16 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.308280380E09 +++$+++ Figuring out page creators and whether they would have been autoconfirmed at the time of page creation is the really horrible part. As I said, autoconfirmed is an implicit state. Fun fact: it's actually possible for people to lose autoconfirmed status in some rare cases, even if they have over 10 edits\/4 days (Tor usage is what I'm thinking of). Hopefully some of this helps. -- +++$+++ ::: Figuring out page creators and whether they would have been autoconfirmed at the time of page creation is the really horrible part. As I said, autoconfirmed is an implicit state. Fun fact: it's actually possible for people to lose autoconfirmed status in some rare cases, even if they have over 10 edits/4 days (Tor usage is what I'm thinking of). Hopefully some of this helps. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride#top|talk]]) 20:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
395289 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ 395285 +++$+++ 395285 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.309155960E09 +++$+++ This sounds fairly tedious and boring. Is there any reason you're asking for this data? Anything to get excited about? -- +++$+++ :This sounds fairly tedious and boring. Is there any reason you're asking for this data? Anything to get excited about? --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride#top|talk]]) 23:26, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

274561 +++$+++ Herbythyme +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Your user page - feel free to change etc etc.  Hope all is ok.  Cheers -- +++$+++ Your user page - feel free to change etc etc.  Hope all is ok.  Cheers --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 12:00, 17 April 2008e (UTC)
274562 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274561 +++$+++ 274561 +++$+++ 2008-04-17 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.208469900E09 +++$+++ Hey Herby. Thanks for that, mate. I've barely been editing lately so I'm rather surprised that I've pissed someone off enough that they'd care enough to be stuffed doing that. Thanks for the sprot, Herby. Muchly appreciated my friend. I trust you and the family are all doing well. Take care mate,  +++$+++ :Hey Herby. Thanks for that, mate. I've barely been editing lately so I'm rather surprised that I've pissed someone off enough that they'd care enough to be stuffed doing that. Thanks for the sprot, Herby. Muchly appreciated my friend. I trust you and the family are all doing well. Take care mate, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 15:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
274563 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274561 +++$+++ 274561 +++$+++ 2008-04-17 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.208473860E09 +++$+++ <nowiki>*sigh*<\/nowiki> Actually, I've just worked out who it is. It's {{user|Ivan Bogdanov}} avoiding his block again.  +++$+++ :<nowiki>*sigh*</nowiki> Actually, I've just worked out who it is. It's {{user|Ivan Bogdanov}} avoiding his block again. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 16:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

536707 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-04 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.165267920E09 +++$+++ '''Woo!''' Thank you all. My sister left a whole fridge full of Vodka Cruisers from her birthday party yesterday, so I'm off to get drunk and baleet some articles... :D [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ '''Woo!''' Thank you all. My sister left a whole fridge full of Vodka Cruisers from her birthday party yesterday, so I'm off to get drunk and baleet some articles... :D [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Daveydweeb 2|'''review!''']]</sub></small>) 13:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
536708 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536707 +++$+++ 536707 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.165268340E09 +++$+++ As long as it's not mine... <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :As long as it's not mine... <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 13:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
536709 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536707 +++$+++ 536708 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.165268340E09 +++$+++ No, I finished that this morning... [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::No, I finished that this morning... [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Daveydweeb 2|'''review!''']]</sub></small>) 13:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
536710 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536707 +++$+++ 536709 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.165268580E09 +++$+++ But how? You didn't have your super powahs back then. I'm actually writing an article right now, so I'll be careful to put it up very late tonight to make sure it doesn't cross your [[:Image:Eyeofsauron.jpg|radar]] ;) <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :::But how? You didn't have your super powahs back then. I'm actually writing an article right now, so I'll be careful to put it up very late tonight to make sure it doesn't cross your [[:Image:Eyeofsauron.jpg|radar]] ;) <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 13:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
536711 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536707 +++$+++ 536710 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.165268880E09 +++$+++ Don't worry; my first action as <strike>ninja<\/strike>admin was to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Paul_Romero&diff=91991222&oldid=91976746 decline] a deletion. :o I'm such a softie. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::::Don't worry; my first action as <strike>ninja</strike>admin was to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Romero&diff=91991222&oldid=91976746 decline] a deletion. :o I'm such a softie. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Daveydweeb 2|'''review!''']]</sub></small>) 13:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
536712 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536707 +++$+++ 536711 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.165269360E09 +++$+++ Awww, it's like watching your kid on their first day of school... <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :::::Awww, it's like watching your kid on their first day of school... <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 13:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
536713 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536707 +++$+++ 536712 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.165269420E09 +++$+++ Except I haven't started crying, yet. :) And I'm pretty sure that, on my first day of school, Mummy Dearest neglected to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADaveydweeb&diff=91985473&oldid=91983964 streak] in celebration. =P [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::::::Except I haven't started crying, yet. :) And I'm pretty sure that, on my first day of school, Mummy Dearest neglected to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADaveydweeb&diff=91985473&oldid=91983964 streak] in celebration. =P [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Daveydweeb 2|'''review!''']]</sub></small>) 13:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
536714 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536707 +++$+++ 536707 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.165275060E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! Have fun with your new tools! If you have any admin-related questions, feel free to contact me. ''' +++$+++ :Congratulations! Have fun with your new tools! If you have any admin-related questions, feel free to contact me. '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 15:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
536715 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536707 +++$+++ 536707 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.165294500E09 +++$+++ As the previous \"lowest ranking admin\", I hereby hand the baton to you.  Have fun studying the manual for the mop.  I think I'm like on chapter 2. Congratulations! =) --  +++$+++ :As the previous "lowest ranking admin", I hereby hand the baton to you.  Have fun studying the manual for the mop.  I think I'm like on chapter 2. Congratulations! =) -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 20:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

274564 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-18 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.208527380E09 +++$+++ Can you have a look at [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/otrs\/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=738564 ORTS for Image:HeatherMills1.jpg] as there is a user that has an issue with it on [[Talk:Heather_Mills#Image|Heather Mills talk page]].  +++$+++ Can you have a look at [https://secure.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=738564 ORTS for Image:HeatherMills1.jpg] as there is a user that has an issue with it on [[Talk:Heather_Mills#Image|Heather Mills talk page]]. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 07:03, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
274565 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274564 +++$+++ 274564 +++$+++ 2008-04-19 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.208593920E09 +++$+++ That's strange, this is the second time I've been asked to check that particular email. It's an email from PETA saying that \"Our materials are not copyrighted and may be redistributed freely.\" The only exception to this is material they have republished from other sources such as books for which they were not the original publisher. I shall go and tell them on the talk page, too. Cheers,  +++$+++ :That's strange, this is the second time I've been asked to check that particular email. It's an email from PETA saying that "Our materials are not copyrighted and may be redistributed freely." The only exception to this is material they have republished from other sources such as books for which they were not the original publisher. I shall go and tell them on the talk page, too. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

12422 +++$+++ Ukexpat +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-07 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.260254160E09 +++$+++ I have reported [[User:Goldfinger 93]] to [[WP:AIV]].&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp; +++$+++ I have reported [[User:Goldfinger 93]] to [[WP:AIV]].&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 22:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
12423 +++$+++ Ukexpat +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12422 +++$+++ 12422 +++$+++ 2009-12-07 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.260255060E09 +++$+++ ...[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Goldfinger_93&diff=prev&oldid=330328624 and blocked].&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp; +++$+++ :...[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Goldfinger_93&diff=prev&oldid=330328624 and blocked].&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 22:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

570049 +++$+++ Ww +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-26 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.159266000E09 +++$+++ DG, I've taken a look and, to the extent the quadfocals let me see anything, have only the following reaction. The Templates yo've produced are all oriented toward crypto inside baseball. Since, from the Average User's perspective, crypto is concerned with such things as confidentiality, message integrity, message authenitication, and non deniability, I suggest that there should be templates for these issues as well. From an inside crypto perspective, I suppose we might have templates noting crypto protocols and partial or zero knowledge protocols, as well. Have I seen anything you were hoping for?  +++$+++ DG, I've taken a look and, to the extent the quadfocals let me see anything, have only the following reaction. The Templates yo've produced are all oriented toward crypto inside baseball. Since, from the Average User's perspective, crypto is concerned with such things as confidentiality, message integrity, message authenitication, and non deniability, I suggest that there should be templates for these issues as well. From an inside crypto perspective, I suppose we might have templates noting crypto protocols and partial or zero knowledge protocols, as well. Have I seen anything you were hoping for? [[User:Ww|ww]] 03:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
570050 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570049 +++$+++ 570049 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.159293600E09 +++$+++ So yes, you certainly have seen several things I didn't think of. Thanks a lot! I always enjoy your feedback. -- +++$+++ :So yes, you certainly have seen several things I didn't think of. Thanks a lot! I always enjoy your feedback. --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 11:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

274568 +++$+++ Danngarcia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-24 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.209069120E09 +++$+++ Please see [[User:Newnimator]] and [[Special:Contributions\/Newnimator|his contributions]] for evidence. Thanks! - +++$+++ Please see [[User:Newnimator]] and [[Special:Contributions/Newnimator|his contributions]] for evidence. Thanks! -[[User:Danngarcia|Danngarcia]] ([[User talk:Danngarcia|talk]]) 13:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
274569 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274568 +++$+++ 274568 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.209069960E09 +++$+++ Cheers for letting me know. Looks like another admin has already done taken care of the block and deletes. :)  +++$+++ :Cheers for letting me know. Looks like another admin has already done taken care of the block and deletes. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

12425 +++$+++ Leaky_caldron +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12425 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-10 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.260475920E09 +++$+++ Following your advice (now in your November archive) I waited a while then received this ticket number in an email from permissions@wikimedia.org: Ticket#2009110510056939. Their email simply said thank you for my email. What happens next in relation to getting these permitted images approved for use? Does the ticket number signify something, if so where can I track it? Regards,  +++$+++ Following your advice (now in your November archive) I waited a while then received this ticket number in an email from permissions@wikimedia.org: Ticket#2009110510056939. Their email simply said thank you for my email. What happens next in relation to getting these permitted images approved for use? Does the ticket number signify something, if so where can I track it? Regards, [[User:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc">Leaky </span>]][[User talk:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Grey;font:bold 8pt kristen itc">Caldron</span>]] 12:12, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
12426 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12425 +++$+++ 12425 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.260485820E09 +++$+++ Have you tried reading down to the bottom of the email?  +++$+++ :Have you tried reading down to the bottom of the email? [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 14:57, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

12427 +++$+++ Bobhannah +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-11 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.260554700E09 +++$+++ {{tl|helpme}} Leaky thanks for the advice the material I have is really important I believe - How do I include citations say from interviews with directors who were there at the time also access to diaries. Agree with you about the match facts -If I missed something you sent me then sorry need some Geordie advice for the Mackems  +++$+++ {{tl|helpme}} Leaky thanks for the advice the material I have is really important I believe - How do I include citations say from interviews with directors who were there at the time also access to diaries. Agree with you about the match facts -If I missed something you sent me then sorry need some Geordie advice for the Mackems [[User:Bobhannah|Bobhannah]] ([[User talk:Bobhannah|talk]]) 10:05, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
12428 +++$+++ Fuhghettaboutit +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12427 +++$+++ 12427 +++$+++ 2009-12-11 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.260566640E09 +++$+++ Are the diaries and your interviews ''published'' anywhere? All content added to articles\u2014especially articles on living persons\u2014must be [[WP:V|verifiable]]. This means that a reader of the article must be able to verify the content themselves, which in turn means they must be able to [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Access to sources|look at the sources themselves]]. This does not mean it has to be available online. Pretty much anything you can find in a library is accessible to the public and thus verifiable. But unpublished private diaries, and interviews are not verifiable content. Our readers can't call you up to verify the content, so if the content you wish to add is just in yours and others' memory, your private notes, unpublished diaries and the like, that can't be accessed to verify and is thus incompetent material as a source.-- +++$+++ :Are the diaries and your interviews ''published'' anywhere? All content added to articles—especially articles on living persons—must be [[WP:V|verifiable]]. This means that a reader of the article must be able to verify the content themselves, which in turn means they must be able to [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Access to sources|look at the sources themselves]]. This does not mean it has to be available online. Pretty much anything you can find in a library is accessible to the public and thus verifiable. But unpublished private diaries, and interviews are not verifiable content. Our readers can't call you up to verify the content, so if the content you wish to add is just in yours and others' memory, your private notes, unpublished diaries and the like, that can't be accessed to verify and is thus incompetent material as a source.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] ([[User talk:Fuhghettaboutit|talk]]) 13:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

536716 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536716 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-05 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.165306440E09 +++$+++ Well done!  Congratulations --  +++$+++ Well done!  Congratulations -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|'''Samir''' <small>धर्म</small>]] 00:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
536717 +++$+++ Yanksox +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536716 +++$+++ 536716 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.165389720E09 +++$+++ Congrats, well done.  +++$+++ :Congrats, well done. [[User talk:Yanksox|<font color="black">Yank</font><font color="red">sox</font>]] 23:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

12430 +++$+++ Eightball +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-22 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.261530480E09 +++$+++ That's great and all but check out his contributions, he took out the flags on every single football team and national team page. It must have taken hours. Also, it annoys me that he apparently did all of this without consulting the football WikiProject, just decided on his own to remove EVERY SINGLE FLAG. Ugh.  +++$+++ That's great and all but check out his contributions, he took out the flags on every single football team and national team page. It must have taken hours. Also, it annoys me that he apparently did all of this without consulting the football WikiProject, just decided on his own to remove EVERY SINGLE FLAG. Ugh. [[User:Eightball|Eightball]] ([[User talk:Eightball|talk]]) 17:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
12431 +++$+++ Eightball +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12430 +++$+++ 12430 +++$+++ 2009-12-22 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.261530720E09 +++$+++ Oh my god, look at the discussion at the top of the wikiproject page, they want to take flags out of roster lists. These people are insane.  +++$+++ :Oh my god, look at the discussion at the top of the wikiproject page, they want to take flags out of roster lists. These people are insane. [[User:Eightball|Eightball]] ([[User talk:Eightball|talk]]) 17:12, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

536719 +++$+++ Redreadersdigest +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-05 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.165307220E09 +++$+++ How about we take this arguement to the next level? Yeah, that's right, bitch. I'm talking about ''e-mail''.  +++$+++ How about we take this arguement to the next level? Yeah, that's right, bitch. I'm talking about ''e-mail''. [[User:Redreadersdigest|Redreadersdigest]] 00:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
536720 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536719 +++$+++ 536719 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.165308300E09 +++$+++ Or, you could take it to deletion review. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Or, you could take it to deletion review. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Daveydweeb 2|'''review!''']]</sub></small>) 00:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

12432 +++$+++ Kvg20 +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12432 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-26 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.261887540E09 +++$+++ Just thoughts, would be interested in your comments.  +++$+++ Just thoughts, would be interested in your comments. [[User:Kvg20|Kvg20]] ([[User talk:Kvg20|talk]]) 20:19, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
12433 +++$+++ Leaky_caldron +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12432 +++$+++ 12432 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.261888320E09 +++$+++ Please continue at the article's talk page.  +++$+++ :Please continue at the article's talk page. [[User:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc">Leaky </span>]][[User talk:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Grey;font:bold 8pt kristen itc">Caldron</span>]] 20:32, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

12434 +++$+++ Orthorhombic +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-07 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.262909040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your input. Would you be willing to help weed out some of this dross... It is badly needed. Cf. [[User_talk:RaseaC#European_winter_storms_of_2009]].  +++$+++ Thanks for your input. Would you be willing to help weed out some of this dross... It is badly needed. Cf. [[User_talk:RaseaC#European_winter_storms_of_2009]]. [[User:Orthorhombic|Orthorhombic]] ([[User talk:Orthorhombic|talk]]) 16:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
12435 +++$+++ Orthorhombic +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12434 +++$+++ 12434 +++$+++ 2010-01-07 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.262910240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for joining in. I have only done down to 23rd Dec. so far.  +++$+++ :Thanks for joining in. I have only done down to 23rd Dec. so far. [[User:Orthorhombic|Orthorhombic]] ([[User talk:Orthorhombic|talk]]) 16:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

570051 +++$+++ Ww +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570051 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-26 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.159266540E09 +++$+++ DG, Confusing submission wasn't it? I'll go with your rewrite (save that I added a link to Fubuki) until I actually plow through their submission to see where I went awry. Not immediatley in any case.  +++$+++ DG, Confusing submission wasn't it? I'll go with your rewrite (save that I added a link to Fubuki) until I actually plow through their submission to see where I went awry. Not immediatley in any case. [[User:Ww|ww]] 03:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
570052 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570051 +++$+++ 570051 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.159293600E09 +++$+++ Yeah, it was confusing. Took me a little googling to find out what it was about. Afterwards I realised I should probably have put those links in as \"External links \/ References\". But instead I got busy making a disambiguation page for [[Fubuki]] since it can mean at least 7 different things. But I only put 6 of them on that disambig page since one of them were about the porn star named Fubuki. I am an \"inclusionist\/mergist\" but I prefer not to link to porn star articles... -- +++$+++ :Yeah, it was confusing. Took me a little googling to find out what it was about. Afterwards I realised I should probably have put those links in as "External links / References". But instead I got busy making a disambiguation page for [[Fubuki]] since it can mean at least 7 different things. But I only put 6 of them on that disambig page since one of them were about the porn star named Fubuki. I am an "inclusionist/mergist" but I prefer not to link to porn star articles... --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 11:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
570053 +++$+++ Ww +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570051 +++$+++ 570052 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.159314420E09 +++$+++ DG, Looks like I was more confused than I thought. How does one recognize this condition in one's self? The problem applies directly to Sanger's expert-based approach for his new version of the Wikipedia. In my case, I find my own understandings tripping over thier own shoelaces far too regularly. I think we naked apes have taken this understanding thing to the limit of our performance, characteristically. I expect that there is an absence of good sense circuits in our brains which would keep us out of our hot water problems (remember the frog) rather better than we've managed so far. Anyway, thanks for cleaning up the roundabout here.  +++$+++ ::DG, Looks like I was more confused than I thought. How does one recognize this condition in one's self? The problem applies directly to Sanger's expert-based approach for his new version of the Wikipedia. In my case, I find my own understandings tripping over thier own shoelaces far too regularly. I think we naked apes have taken this understanding thing to the limit of our performance, characteristically. I expect that there is an absence of good sense circuits in our brains which would keep us out of our hot water problems (remember the frog) rather better than we've managed so far. Anyway, thanks for cleaning up the roundabout here. [[User:Ww|ww]] 16:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
570054 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570051 +++$+++ 570053 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.159315080E09 +++$+++ Well, I have researched chaos as my dayjob for many years now (randomised algorithms that is) so I think I can call my self an expert in chaos and randomness by now. But I admit I to all too often discover I am confused over lots of things. I think we simply have to accept that life is chaotic. Regarding shoelaces: When I dance I always tie them with an extra knot (what we at least in Swedish call a \"double knot\") thus I never trip over my shoelaces. It seems to me Wikipedia also kind of comes with \"multiple knots\". That is, other editors that double and triple check what we edit. So no worries mate! -- +++$+++ :::Well, I have researched chaos as my dayjob for many years now (randomised algorithms that is) so I think I can call my self an expert in chaos and randomness by now. But I admit I to all too often discover I am confused over lots of things. I think we simply have to accept that life is chaotic. Regarding shoelaces: When I dance I always tie them with an extra knot (what we at least in Swedish call a "double knot") thus I never trip over my shoelaces. It seems to me Wikipedia also kind of comes with "multiple knots". That is, other editors that double and triple check what we edit. So no worries mate! --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 16:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

89454 +++$+++ Milkunderwood +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-22 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.298383980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the re-do -- your edit is much better than mine. +++$+++ Thanks for the re-do -- your edit is much better than mine.[[User:Milkunderwood|Milkunderwood]] ([[User talk:Milkunderwood|talk]]) 06:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
89455 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89454 +++$+++ 89454 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.298384280E09 +++$+++ Thank you very kindly! I merely borrowed the idea from other lists I have seen.\u2014 +++$+++ :Thank you very kindly! I merely borrowed the idea from other lists I have seen.—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 06:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
89456 +++$+++ Milkunderwood +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89454 +++$+++ 89455 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.298384400E09 +++$+++ What is the 0 (zero) you put at the end? A typo?  +++$+++ ::What is the 0 (zero) you put at the end? A typo? [[User:Milkunderwood|Milkunderwood]] ([[User talk:Milkunderwood|talk]]) 06:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
89457 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89454 +++$+++ 89456 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.298384640E09 +++$+++ Picky, picky! It's a lowercase closing parenthesis, of course! (Shift key stuck, and I didn't notice.)\u2014 +++$+++ :::Picky, picky! It's a lowercase closing parenthesis, of course! (Shift key stuck, and I didn't notice.)—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 06:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

12438 +++$+++ DASHBot +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-16 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.263631740E09 +++$+++ Thanks!-- +++$+++ Thanks!--[[User:DASHBot|DASHBot]] ([[User talk:DASHBot|talk]]) 00:49, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
12439 +++$+++ Matt Lewis +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12438 +++$+++ 12438 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.263805380E09 +++$+++ ascertain whether there is support for a 'two-phase' poll at the eventual RfC (not far off now), where CDA will finally be put to the community.  +++$+++ * ascertain whether there is support for a 'two-phase' poll at the eventual RfC (not far off now), where CDA will finally be put to the community. [[User:Matt Lewis|Matt Lewis]] ([[User talk:Matt Lewis|talk]]) 01:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

274583 +++$+++ Danngarcia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-29 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.209508860E09 +++$+++ He created another sock ([[User:LykaRaymundo]]). Please check out [[Special:Contributions\/LykaRaymundo|his contributions]] for evidence. Thanks! - +++$+++ He created another sock ([[User:LykaRaymundo]]). Please check out [[Special:Contributions/LykaRaymundo|his contributions]] for evidence. Thanks! -[[User:Danngarcia|Danngarcia]] ([[User talk:Danngarcia|talk]]) 15:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
274584 +++$+++ Danngarcia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274583 +++$+++ 274583 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.209591720E09 +++$+++ Another possible sockpuppet: ([[User:Carpioeje]]). User has also the same editing pattern (All edited articles are related to [[Angel Locsin]] and user also checks the \"minor edit\" box on almost all of [[Special:Contributions\/Carpioeje|his contributions]]. - +++$+++ :Another possible sockpuppet: ([[User:Carpioeje]]). User has also the same editing pattern (All edited articles are related to [[Angel Locsin]] and user also checks the "minor edit" box on almost all of [[Special:Contributions/Carpioeje|his contributions]]. -[[User:Danngarcia|Danngarcia]] ([[User talk:Danngarcia|talk]]) 14:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
274585 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274583 +++$+++ 274584 +++$+++ 2008-05-03 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.209845640E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks for letting me know. I see that Lyka has been blocked. I'm watching Carpioje but he hasn't edited again. Carpioje doesn't have any edits to [[Angel Locsin]] which is making me hesitate to hit the button but I do think you're probably right. I think I'll just keep an eye on it for now. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Okay, thanks for letting me know. I see that Lyka has been blocked. I'm watching Carpioje but he hasn't edited again. Carpioje doesn't have any edits to [[Angel Locsin]] which is making me hesitate to hit the button but I do think you're probably right. I think I'll just keep an eye on it for now. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

536728 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.165929540E09 +++$+++ Ta for backing me up. I was under threat of being 'reported to my supervisors'! <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ Ta for backing me up. I was under threat of being 'reported to my supervisors'! <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User talk:riana_dzasta|riana_'''dzasta''']]</span> 05:19, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
536729 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536728 +++$+++ 536728 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.165945800E09 +++$+++ I guess that would be me, right? :D [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ :I guess that would be me, right? :D [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Daveydweeb 2|'''review!''']]</sub></small>) 09:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
536730 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536728 +++$+++ 536728 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ ''Heya! Anthony asked me to fill in a little for him while he's away, and I'm happy to help out. I'm not an especially active editor, but if you have any questions please feel free to leave them at my talkpage, or email me using the link on my userpage. :) Cheerio! Daveydweeb (chat\/review!) 20:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :''Heya! Anthony asked me to fill in a little for him while he's away, and I'm happy to help out. I'm not an especially active editor, but if you have any questions please feel free to leave them at my talkpage, or email me using the link on my userpage. :) Cheerio! Daveydweeb (chat/review!) 20:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
536731 +++$+++ Db1944 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536728 +++$+++ 536730 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.166535300E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that\u2019s very kind of you. I\u2019m currently working on several projects and so fat they\u2019ve been going smoothly, but if I\u2019d need some information it\u2019s nice to know you\u2019re available. Good day (as Anthony says \u2013 GMT+2)  +++$+++ ::Thanks, that’s very kind of you. I’m currently working on several projects and so fat they’ve been going smoothly, but if I’d need some information it’s nice to know you’re available. Good day (as Anthony says – GMT+2) [[User:Db1944|Db1944]] 05:35, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
536732 +++$+++ Db1944 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536728 +++$+++ 536731 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.166566500E09 +++$+++ I\u2019m a fairly independent guy, so I do most of my edits on my own. Sometimes I get stuck (mainly on technical stuff or Wikipedian policies) and then I ask Anthony. He started up a talk page especially assigned for our discussions \u2013 [[User talk:Anthony cfc\/adoptdiscussion|here]]. I also asked him to review an article I wrote, but unfortunately he didn\u2019t get around to it. I\u2019m very low maintenance\u2026 :)  +++$+++ :::I’m a fairly independent guy, so I do most of my edits on my own. Sometimes I get stuck (mainly on technical stuff or Wikipedian policies) and then I ask Anthony. He started up a talk page especially assigned for our discussions – [[User talk:Anthony cfc/adoptdiscussion|here]]. I also asked him to review an article I wrote, but unfortunately he didn’t get around to it. I’m very low maintenance… :) [[User:Db1944|Db1944]] 14:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

274586 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274586 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-30 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.209549840E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Sarah&diff=prev&oldid=207856058 This edit] and understood Sarah my friend. Oh what bravery our forbears offered to this young country.-- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Sarah&diff=prev&oldid=207856058 This edit] and understood Sarah my friend. Oh what bravery our forbears offered to this young country.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 03:04, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
274587 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274586 +++$+++ 274586 +++$+++ 2008-05-03 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.209845880E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your very kind note, Steve. Very muchly appreciated.  +++$+++ :Thank you for your very kind note, Steve. Very muchly appreciated. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:18, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

12444 +++$+++ TheRetroGuy +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-31 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.270060860E09 +++$+++ Well I guess Winter 2009-10 actually ended on 21 March (the spring equinox) so that information just misses the boat.  +++$+++ Well I guess Winter 2009-10 actually ended on 21 March (the spring equinox) so that information just misses the boat. [[User:TheRetroGuy|TheRetroGuy]] ([[User talk:TheRetroGuy|talk]]) 11:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
12445 +++$+++ TheRetroGuy +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12444 +++$+++ 12444 +++$+++ 2010-03-31 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.270062000E09 +++$+++ I agree. It's not notable at the moment, but if it continues for several days it might be worth a paragraph or two. I was a bit dubious about it when someone added the information yesterday but decided to reference it anyway. I think I'll post it on the talk page just in case we need it again and so it's easier to locate. Cheers.  +++$+++ :I agree. It's not notable at the moment, but if it continues for several days it might be worth a paragraph or two. I was a bit dubious about it when someone added the information yesterday but decided to reference it anyway. I think I'll post it on the talk page just in case we need it again and so it's easier to locate. Cheers. [[User:TheRetroGuy|TheRetroGuy]] ([[User talk:TheRetroGuy|talk]]) 12:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
12446 +++$+++ Leaky_caldron +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12444 +++$+++ 12445 +++$+++ 2010-03-31 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.270062360E09 +++$+++ NP.  +++$+++ ::NP. [[User:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc">Leaky </span>]][[User talk:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Grey;font:bold 8pt kristen itc">Caldron</span>]] 12:06, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
12447 +++$+++ TheRetroGuy +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12444 +++$+++ 12446 +++$+++ 2010-03-31 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.270077000E09 +++$+++ Just removed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Winter_of_2009%E2%80%932010_in_the_United_Kingdom&diff=353169230&oldid=353129929 another March 31 section]  +++$+++ :::Just removed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Winter_of_2009%E2%80%932010_in_the_United_Kingdom&diff=353169230&oldid=353129929 another March 31 section] [[User:TheRetroGuy|TheRetroGuy]] ([[User talk:TheRetroGuy|talk]]) 16:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

536734 +++$+++ Jayden54 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536734 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-25 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.167114300E09 +++$+++ Hi, any progress on the AFD bot you posted about in [[Wikipedia:Bot requests#AfD alert bot|WP:Bot requests]]? If not, do you mind if I start getting the ball rolling by posting on bot approval, writing the bot, etc? Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi, any progress on the AFD bot you posted about in [[Wikipedia:Bot requests#AfD alert bot|WP:Bot requests]]? If not, do you mind if I start getting the ball rolling by posting on bot approval, writing the bot, etc? Cheers, [[User:Jayden54|Jayden54]] 22:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
536735 +++$+++ Jayden54 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536734 +++$+++ 536734 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.167178320E09 +++$+++ I will get started then, and keep you informed. Thank you for your fast reply! Cheers,  +++$+++ :I will get started then, and keep you informed. Thank you for your fast reply! Cheers, [[User:Jayden54|Jayden54]] 16:12, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

274591 +++$+++ SmithBlue +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-02 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.209751020E09 +++$+++ Should there be some notice on the RfC stating that it is closed and archived? There is nothing apparent to me along these lines at [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/Skyring]].  +++$+++ Should there be some notice on the RfC stating that it is closed and archived? There is nothing apparent to me along these lines at [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Skyring]]. [[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue|talk]]) 10:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
274592 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274591 +++$+++ 274591 +++$+++ 2008-05-03 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.209847680E09 +++$+++ Hey SmithBlue. Well, usually once the discussion of an RfC has finished and there's been no further edits for thirty days, the bot delists and archives it. I just checked a few other ones in the archives and a couple have been formally closed with \"discussion is archived do not edit\" templates but most are just archived without so I'd be inclined to leave as is for now. I don't have a problem if people still have things to discus but everyone else has long since stopped using it to discuss the original issue and Lester is just posting periodic evaluations of Peter, one complimentary, one not, as though he is trying to keep it hanging over Peter's head in perpetuity which seems pretty unfair to me. I'll keep an eye on it but I don't think it needs to be formally closed at this point. Thanks for your message. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hey SmithBlue. Well, usually once the discussion of an RfC has finished and there's been no further edits for thirty days, the bot delists and archives it. I just checked a few other ones in the archives and a couple have been formally closed with "discussion is archived do not edit" templates but most are just archived without so I'd be inclined to leave as is for now. I don't have a problem if people still have things to discus but everyone else has long since stopped using it to discuss the original issue and Lester is just posting periodic evaluations of Peter, one complimentary, one not, as though he is trying to keep it hanging over Peter's head in perpetuity which seems pretty unfair to me. I'll keep an eye on it but I don't think it needs to be formally closed at this point. Thanks for your message. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

536736 +++$+++ JWSchmidt +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-29 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.167379560E09 +++$+++ I'd rather do [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Day]] in a few weeks than a [[New Year]] theme now. For this week I'd rather do [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost\/2006-12-26\/Wikipedia and academia]] or something about fund raising. -- +++$+++ I'd rather do [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Day]] in a few weeks than a [[New Year]] theme now. For this week I'd rather do [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-12-26/Wikipedia and academia]] or something about fund raising. --[[User:JWSchmidt|JWSchmidt]] 00:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
536737 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536736 +++$+++ 536736 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.167883200E09 +++$+++ Would you like to see Esperanza return. [[User:Geo.plrd|<font color= \"blue\">G<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Would you like to see Esperanza return. [[User:Geo.plrd|<font color= "blue">G</font>]][[User:Geo.plrd/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User_talk:Geo.plrd|<font color= "grey">o</font>]]. 20:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
536738 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536736 +++$+++ 536737 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.167889260E09 +++$+++ Me? Not really. Its structure was, frankly, a joke -- the only way I'd be happy to see EA return would be after a [i]massive[\/i] overhaul that decentralised its leadership and cut all of the bureaucracy from its previous incarnation. As far as I can see, this is as close as we'll get. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::Me? Not really. Its structure was, frankly, a joke -- the only way I'd be happy to see EA return would be after a [i]massive[/i] overhaul that decentralised its leadership and cut all of the bureaucracy from its previous incarnation. As far as I can see, this is as close as we'll get. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Daveydweeb 2|'''review!''']]</sub></small>) 21:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

12449 +++$+++ KingOfTheMedia +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12449 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-04 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.270428240E09 +++$+++ I've noticed that you are one of the [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&grouped=on&page=Big_Brother_2009_(UK) top contributors] to [[Big Brother 2009 (UK)]]. I am sending this message to inform you that the article is now nominated for Good Article status.  +++$+++ I've noticed that you are one of the [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&grouped=on&page=Big_Brother_2009_(UK) top contributors] to [[Big Brother 2009 (UK)]]. I am sending this message to inform you that the article is now nominated for Good Article status. [[User:KingOfTheMedia|KingOfTheMedia]] ([[User talk:KingOfTheMedia|talk]]) 17:44, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
12450 +++$+++ MegaPedant +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12449 +++$+++ 12449 +++$+++ 2010-04-04 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.270440720E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'd be interested to hear what you think of recent changes to this article. I've opened a discussion on its [[Talk:Big_Brother_2009_(UK)|talk page]]. \u2014 +++$+++ :Hi. I'd be interested to hear what you think of recent changes to this article. I've opened a discussion on its [[Talk:Big_Brother_2009_(UK)|talk page]]. —[[User:MegaPedant|'''Mega''']][[User_talk:MegaPedant|''Pedant'']] 21:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

12451 +++$+++  +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12451 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I look forward to your thoughts in the future, and I am sure that we can come to a consensus on this virginal issue. cassius1213 14:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ I look forward to your thoughts in the future, and I am sure that we can come to a consensus on this virginal issue. cassius1213 14:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
12452 +++$+++ Leaky_caldron +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12451 +++$+++ 12451 +++$+++ 2010-04-17 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.271538540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the lecture. I'm removing it from 1966 World Cup because I disagee with it and there is no consensus.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the lecture. I'm removing it from 1966 World Cup because I disagee with it and there is no consensus. [[User:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc">Leaky </span>]][[User talk:Leaky_caldron|<span style="color:Grey;font:bold 8pt kristen itc">Caldron</span>]] 14:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
12453 +++$+++  +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12451 +++$+++ 12452 +++$+++ 2010-04-17 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.271540400E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry if you misinterpreted my comments as a lecture; they certainly weren't intended to be taken as such. However, I believe that you've missed the point of those comments. There is no consensus on this matter; there is only silence and [[WP:SILENCE|silence does not imply consensus]]. I have made an edit that I believe adds value to the articles in question. Moreover, this edit brings the articles in question into alignment with [[Template:Footballbox|the exemplar use of the template in question]]. You have thus far reverted one of those edits because \"[you] disagree with it\". However, I still believe that we can come to a consensus on this matter if we can open a dialogue. Additionally, I continue to be interested in what your reasons for reverting are (of course, other than those of personal aesthetics and disagreement; those have been made clear). Finally and again, I hope that I will hear your thoughtful and reasoned comments soon. cassius1213 14:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ ::I'm sorry if you misinterpreted my comments as a lecture; they certainly weren't intended to be taken as such. However, I believe that you've missed the point of those comments. There is no consensus on this matter; there is only silence and [[WP:SILENCE|silence does not imply consensus]]. I have made an edit that I believe adds value to the articles in question. Moreover, this edit brings the articles in question into alignment with [[Template:Footballbox|the exemplar use of the template in question]]. You have thus far reverted one of those edits because "[you] disagree with it". However, I still believe that we can come to a consensus on this matter if we can open a dialogue. Additionally, I continue to be interested in what your reasons for reverting are (of course, other than those of personal aesthetics and disagreement; those have been made clear). Finally and again, I hope that I will hear your thoughtful and reasoned comments soon. cassius1213 14:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
12454 +++$+++  +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12451 +++$+++ 12453 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ You made an excellent point that I had not considered and I thank you for that. I am going to consider my position for a while longer, but until I get back to you on this, feel free to revert my other such edits. cassius1213 16:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ :::You made an excellent point that I had not considered and I thank you for that. I am going to consider my position for a while longer, but until I get back to you on this, feel free to revert my other such edits. cassius1213 16:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

274596 +++$+++ Paul Yeratz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-08 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.210283460E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Incidents#Newbie_user_Camcd93 Sock] + [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Northeastern_State_University&diff=prev&oldid=210992549 vandalism] = <tt>insert answer here<\/tt> :)  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Newbie_user_Camcd93 Sock] + [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northeastern_State_University&diff=prev&oldid=210992549 vandalism] = <tt>insert answer here</tt> :) [[User:Paul Yeratz|Paul Yeratz]] ([[User talk:Paul Yeratz|talk]]) 14:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
274597 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274596 +++$+++ 274596 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.210312860E09 +++$+++ = Blocked! :)  +++$+++ := Blocked! :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 23:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

536742 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536742 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.170971760E09 +++$+++ Hey buddy, where've ya been? My talk page is mighty quiet without you... :) <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ Hey buddy, where've ya been? My talk page is mighty quiet without you... :) <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|'''dzasta''']]</span> 13:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
536743 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536742 +++$+++ 536742 +++$+++ 2007-02-09 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.171021140E09 +++$+++ Oh-ho, no jokes about banned users, I appear to be learning my lesson on that one... :) *sigh* As for the Sanger situation - wow. I haven't been contributing to CZ, but I've been keeping up with the mailing list, and for a project that's less than a year old, they sure seem to do a lot of navel-gazing. Bah, stay here, people are far more reasonable. <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ :Oh-ho, no jokes about banned users, I appear to be learning my lesson on that one... :) *sigh* As for the Sanger situation - wow. I haven't been contributing to CZ, but I've been keeping up with the mailing list, and for a project that's less than a year old, they sure seem to do a lot of navel-gazing. Bah, stay here, people are far more reasonable. <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|'''dzasta''']]</span> 03:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
536744 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536742 +++$+++ 536743 +++$+++ 2007-02-09 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.171026780E09 +++$+++ Oh, that sucks! I have a friend who has 2 classes right after each other which are on opposite sides of the city... dodgy timetables. I'm probably going to start enrolment today\/tomorrow, but I have to go to uni first, seeing as I can't seem to find my major topics on my options list. Hmmmm. Anyway, I'm off to watch Scrubs reruns :) Take care! <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ ::Oh, that sucks! I have a friend who has 2 classes right after each other which are on opposite sides of the city... dodgy timetables. I'm probably going to start enrolment today/tomorrow, but I have to go to uni first, seeing as I can't seem to find my major topics on my options list. Hmmmm. Anyway, I'm off to watch Scrubs reruns :) Take care! <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|'''dzasta''']]</span> 05:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

274599 +++$+++ A. B. +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-16 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.210977240E09 +++$+++ --<font face=\"Futura\"> +++$+++ --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] <sup>([[User talk:A. B.|talk]] •  [[Special:Contributions/A. B.|contribs]])</sup> </font> 15:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
274600 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274599 +++$+++ 274599 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.211016420E09 +++$+++ Thanks AB. I actually got a very polite email from Wfgh66 this morning asking me to help him resolve the blacklist issue but I'm rather surprised to see him say that he and I are now on good terms because we haven't had any contact that I recall since he spammed my email address with rantings. I am going to have a read over the previous discussions before I head over the blacklist page. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks AB. I actually got a very polite email from Wfgh66 this morning asking me to help him resolve the blacklist issue but I'm rather surprised to see him say that he and I are now on good terms because we haven't had any contact that I recall since he spammed my email address with rantings. I am going to have a read over the previous discussions before I head over the blacklist page. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
274601 +++$+++  Shapiros10 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274599 +++$+++ 274599 +++$+++ 2008-05-24 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.211692440E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  I assure you, you won't be disappointed.  Oh, and please call me Sam.  +++$+++ :Thank you.  I assure you, you won't be disappointed.  Oh, and please call me Sam. [[User:Shapiros10|Shapiros10]] [[User Talk: Shapiros10|Came Back!]] 22:14, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

274602 +++$+++  Shapiros10 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-24 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.211692620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shapiros10|Shapiros10]] [[User Talk: Shapiros10|Came Back!]] 22:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
274603 +++$+++  Shapiros10 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274602 +++$+++ 274602 +++$+++ 2008-05-27 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.211911380E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  I'll just spend 1 neew year, or march since it's my birthday.  +++$+++ :Thank you.  I'll just spend 1 neew year, or march since it's my birthday. [[User:Shapiros10|Shapiros10]] [[User Talk: Shapiros10|Came Back!]] 11:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

12460 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-06 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.273206780E09 +++$+++ I would also want to ask the question you asked, why is it important to keep a article that is being vandalized repeatedly unprotected?  +++$+++ I would also want to ask the question you asked, why is it important to keep a article that is being vandalized repeatedly unprotected? [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 21:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
12461 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12460 +++$+++ 12460 +++$+++ 2010-05-06 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.273207380E09 +++$+++ All it would do is disrupt the article, strange indeed. regards.  +++$+++ :All it would do is disrupt the article, strange indeed. regards. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 21:43, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
12462 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12460 +++$+++ 12460 +++$+++ 2010-05-06 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.273207500E09 +++$+++ What about Balls, it looks like a simple attack, it has been reported that some group or other from yorkshire is going to attack him, I have made an edit there, ewhat do you think?  +++$+++ :What about Balls, it looks like a simple attack, it has been reported that some group or other from yorkshire is going to attack him, I have made an edit there, ewhat do you think? [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 21:45, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

89458 +++$+++ Nandt1 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89458 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-03 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.299187560E09 +++$+++ I think I have gone as far as I can, with the limited sources available to me, to improve the accuracy of Wikipedia's article on Piston.  At least at this stage we no longer have Piston suddenly deciding that everyone is going to have to join the service '''''in the mid-1920s (!)''''' -- nor poor Mrs Piston encumbered with the wrong first name.  I feel fairly sure that you must have vastly better library resources in the field of music than I do; maybe you could track down the last couple of missing citations one day?  +++$+++ I think I have gone as far as I can, with the limited sources available to me, to improve the accuracy of Wikipedia's article on Piston.  At least at this stage we no longer have Piston suddenly deciding that everyone is going to have to join the service '''''in the mid-1920s (!)''''' -- nor poor Mrs Piston encumbered with the wrong first name.  I feel fairly sure that you must have vastly better library resources in the field of music than I do; maybe you could track down the last couple of missing citations one day? [[User:Nandt1|Nandt1]] ([[User talk:Nandt1|talk]]) 13:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
89459 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89458 +++$+++ 89458 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.299202620E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid that I have given a hard time to your very helpful edits, without adequately expressing appreciation for your work. Your withdrawal of that one website source is probably for the best (the substitution is much preferable, I think), though my tagging it for verification of credibility was meant as nothing more than just that. The article is indeed improved, and you have brought in some sources of which I was unaware. Thank you.\u2014 +++$+++ :I'm afraid that I have given a hard time to your very helpful edits, without adequately expressing appreciation for your work. Your withdrawal of that one website source is probably for the best (the substitution is much preferable, I think), though my tagging it for verification of credibility was meant as nothing more than just that. The article is indeed improved, and you have brought in some sources of which I was unaware. Thank you.—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 17:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
89460 +++$+++ Nandt1 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89458 +++$+++ 89459 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.299277740E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your kind remarks.  I am all in favor of setting high standards for references.  It is worrying nowadays how many of the \"sources\" on the web turn out to doing little more than recycling material from Wikipedia articles.  +++$+++ ::Many thanks for your kind remarks.  I am all in favor of setting high standards for references.  It is worrying nowadays how many of the "sources" on the web turn out to doing little more than recycling material from Wikipedia articles. [[User:Nandt1|Nandt1]] ([[User talk:Nandt1|talk]]) 14:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

274607 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274607 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-27 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.211902860E09 +++$+++ Thank you Mr Acalamari. Very much appreciate the thought. :) I hope all is well with you and your family. Cheers,  +++$+++ Thank you Mr Acalamari. Very much appreciate the thought. :) I hope all is well with you and your family. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
274608 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274607 +++$+++ 274607 +++$+++ 2008-05-27 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.211928300E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome! It's nice to spread some good cheer around. Yes, everything's fine where I am: thanks for the interest. :) Same over there?  +++$+++ :You're very welcome! It's nice to spread some good cheer around. Yes, everything's fine where I am: thanks for the interest. :) Same over there? [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 15:45, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

274609 +++$+++ Smartaccord +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274609 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-27 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.211896140E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Smartaccord|Smartaccord]] ([[User talk:Smartaccord|talk]]) 06:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
274610 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274609 +++$+++ 274609 +++$+++ 2008-05-27 08:37:00 +++$+++ 1.211902620E09 +++$+++ Sure, I can do that but you will have to either give me your email address or go to [[Special:Preferences]] and register your email address under \"User profile\" and then go to the bottom of the same page under the heading \"Email\" and click the box \"Enable e-mail from other users\" so that you can receive emails from others. Then let me know and I will email you the article.  +++$+++ :Sure, I can do that but you will have to either give me your email address or go to [[Special:Preferences]] and register your email address under "User profile" and then go to the bottom of the same page under the heading "Email" and click the box "Enable e-mail from other users" so that you can receive emails from others. Then let me know and I will email you the article. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

12466 +++$+++ Sunderland06 +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12466 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-16 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.274047320E09 +++$+++ I no longer have this data saved, but I don't think it should be too hard to knock up another version.  +++$+++ I no longer have this data saved, but I don't think it should be too hard to knock up another version. [[User:Sunderland06|<font color="red">'''Sunderland06'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Sunderland06|talk]]) 15:02, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
12467 +++$+++ Sunderland06 +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12466 +++$+++ 12466 +++$+++ 2010-05-16 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.274048460E09 +++$+++ Yeah that's right, I'm uploading now.  +++$+++ :Yeah that's right, I'm uploading now. [[User:Sunderland06|<font color="red">'''Sunderland06'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Sunderland06|talk]]) 15:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
12468 +++$+++ Sunderland06 +++$+++ Leaky caldron +++$+++ 12466 +++$+++ 12467 +++$+++ 2010-05-16 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.274048460E09 +++$+++ Done it.  +++$+++ ::Done it. [[User:Sunderland06|<font color="red">'''Sunderland06'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Sunderland06|talk]]) 15:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

536755 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536755 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-20 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.177052580E09 +++$+++ Saw you on Rob's talkpage - dare I hope you're going to be active? :) How's uni going? &ndash; <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ Saw you on Rob's talkpage - dare I hope you're going to be active? :) How's uni going? &ndash; <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:Riana|Riana]] <sup>[[User talk:Riana|<font color="seagreen">ऋ</font>]]</sup></span> 00:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
536756 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536755 +++$+++ 536755 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.177091100E09 +++$+++ [[Life of Brian|Oh, I sometimes hang awake at night, dreaming of being spat at in the face!]] Seriously... that's weird! I hardly dare to ask the story behind it... I'm well, just hanging on to the last shreds of holiday before Monday... although there is some compensation, as we Adelaide folks get to meet the GodKing on Monday morning. &ndash; <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ :[[Life of Brian|Oh, I sometimes hang awake at night, dreaming of being spat at in the face!]] Seriously... that's weird! I hardly dare to ask the story behind it... I'm well, just hanging on to the last shreds of holiday before Monday... although there is some compensation, as we Adelaide folks get to meet the GodKing on Monday morning. &ndash; <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:Riana|Riana]] <sup>[[User talk:Riana|<font color="seagreen">ऋ</font>]]</sup></span> 10:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
536757 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536755 +++$+++ 536756 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.177094700E09 +++$+++ I'll take a tape recorder along :) Don't know how talkative any of us will be, though, it's at 7:30AM! We'll probably talk about Wikimania 08, Wikimedia Australia, that sort of thing. Or we'll just fall asleep in our coffees, whatever :) Hey I have to go, it's my dinnertime, but it's good to have you around(ish!) Take care, and maybe start wearing safety glasses to work, &ndash; <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ ::I'll take a tape recorder along :) Don't know how talkative any of us will be, though, it's at 7:30AM! We'll probably talk about Wikimania 08, Wikimedia Australia, that sort of thing. Or we'll just fall asleep in our coffees, whatever :) Hey I have to go, it's my dinnertime, but it's good to have you around(ish!) Take care, and maybe start wearing safety glasses to work, &ndash; <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:Riana|Riana]] <sup>[[User talk:Riana|<font color="seagreen">ऋ</font>]]</sup></span> 11:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

264222 +++$+++ CzechOut +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-13 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.186989480E09 +++$+++ I've renominated ''Yes Minister'' for FA.  When I read the archive, I was unconvinced it was clearly shouted down the last time.  And anyway, a year's passed since that last review.  I can't see anything seriously wrong with it now.  Maybe fresh eyes will give a more conclusive discussion this time around.  +++$+++ I've renominated ''Yes Minister'' for FA.  When I read the archive, I was unconvinced it was clearly shouted down the last time.  And anyway, a year's passed since that last review.  I can't see anything seriously wrong with it now.  Maybe fresh eyes will give a more conclusive discussion this time around. [[User:CzechOut|CzechOut]] 00:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
264223 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264222 +++$+++ 264222 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.187017020E09 +++$+++ OK. Well what is going to get opposition is that there are quite a few unreferenced sections. There are only about 20 refs, which seems few for a FA? And that's before the grammarphiliacs get to it!.  +++$+++ :OK. Well what is going to get opposition is that there are quite a few unreferenced sections. There are only about 20 refs, which seems few for a FA? And that's before the grammarphiliacs get to it!. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 07:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
264224 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264222 +++$+++ 264222 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.187016960E09 +++$+++ Cool. The instructions are at: [[Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries]]. The photographer should agree to the implications of the free license, hence that statement, and the email should be forward to the address in the next section: 'When permission is confirmed'. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Cool. The instructions are at: [[Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries]]. The photographer should agree to the implications of the free license, hence that statement, and the email should be forward to the address in the next section: 'When permission is confirmed'. Cheers. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 07:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

274614 +++$+++ Skyring +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-27 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.211939880E09 +++$+++ I've taken note of your comments (and those of a few other editors I respect). You might care to cast your eye over some of my [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Skyring recent contributions.] I think that the problem is mainly between Lester and myself, and I've proposed mediation with only two parties. Some of the other editors are more interested in stirring up trouble than in progressing the article, and there is one blatant troll. Mediation with these folk involved would be too hard on the hapless mediator, but with Lester and I, and a bit of good will, and a good mediator, I think we can get somewhere. -- +++$+++ I've taken note of your comments (and those of a few other editors I respect). You might care to cast your eye over some of my [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Skyring recent contributions.] I think that the problem is mainly between Lester and myself, and I've proposed mediation with only two parties. Some of the other editors are more interested in stirring up trouble than in progressing the article, and there is one blatant troll. Mediation with these folk involved would be too hard on the hapless mediator, but with Lester and I, and a bit of good will, and a good mediator, I think we can get somewhere. --[[User:Skyring|Pete]] ([[User talk:Skyring|talk]]) 18:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
274615 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274614 +++$+++ 274614 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.211969100E09 +++$+++ Thanks Peter. I appreciate you pausing to give this issue some thought and I think mediation between you and Lester would be a very good thing. The JH mediation request seems likely to be useless and a waste of time but it would be a great start if there were a way to get you and Lester to the table so I hope that Lester will agree to start with that. Something needs to be done with the wider group there as well, though, as I see a number of problem editors there and I really do see this heading to Arbitration very soon if things don't change radically. Just a couple of days ago some of us were discussing making an ArbCom request for the Australian Politics articles. The important thing from your perspective is to make sure that you stay on the right side of policies so that ArbCom have no cause to name you as subject of any remedies.  +++$+++ :Thanks Peter. I appreciate you pausing to give this issue some thought and I think mediation between you and Lester would be a very good thing. The JH mediation request seems likely to be useless and a waste of time but it would be a great start if there were a way to get you and Lester to the table so I hope that Lester will agree to start with that. Something needs to be done with the wider group there as well, though, as I see a number of problem editors there and I really do see this heading to Arbitration very soon if things don't change radically. Just a couple of days ago some of us were discussing making an ArbCom request for the Australian Politics articles. The important thing from your perspective is to make sure that you stay on the right side of policies so that ArbCom have no cause to name you as subject of any remedies. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:05, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

570057 +++$+++ Rick Block +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-20 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.161377160E09 +++$+++ Hi - I've moved the discussion about the navigation bar template from [[WP:VPT]] to [[template talk:Navigation bar]].  I'd like to understand specifically what you think is ugly about it.  Please comment there.  Thanks. --  +++$+++ Hi - I've moved the discussion about the navigation bar template from [[WP:VPT]] to [[template talk:Navigation bar]].  I'd like to understand specifically what you think is ugly about it.  Please comment there.  Thanks. -- [[user:Rick Block|Rick Block]] <small>([[user talk:Rick Block|talk]])</small> 13:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
570058 +++$+++ Rick Block +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570057 +++$+++ 570057 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.161814320E09 +++$+++ I am still interested in your comments about this.  Please comment at [[template talk:Navigation bar]].  Thanks. --  +++$+++ :I am still interested in your comments about this.  Please comment at [[template talk:Navigation bar]].  Thanks. -- [[user:Rick Block|Rick Block]] <small>([[user talk:Rick Block|talk]])</small> 15:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
570059 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570057 +++$+++ 570058 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.161990000E09 +++$+++ Oh, sorry for not responding earlier. I have been busy with other stuff (most of it out in the real world). And yes, I will take a look and comment. -- +++$+++ ::Oh, sorry for not responding earlier. I have been busy with other stuff (most of it out in the real world). And yes, I will take a look and comment. --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 16:00, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
570060 +++$+++ Rick Block +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570057 +++$+++ 570059 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.162001820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the comments.  There seems to be fairly strong sentiment that scrolling is inherently evil and should not be allowed (at least from some camps).  It's a little hard to tell if there's only a few editors who violently object or if this is a widespread objection.  If we end up with \"scrolling shall not be used in any circumstance\" this template will be deleted.  I'm thinking about a way to generalize the previous \"virtual scroll\" idea (one template that looks different on each page), but without requiring a script to generate it.  If the actual scrolling version goes away, we'll have to do something else.  I'm not thrilled with your version (6 templates), but it's certainly far better than a huge monstrosity.  --  +++$+++ :::Thanks for the comments.  There seems to be fairly strong sentiment that scrolling is inherently evil and should not be allowed (at least from some camps).  It's a little hard to tell if there's only a few editors who violently object or if this is a widespread objection.  If we end up with "scrolling shall not be used in any circumstance" this template will be deleted.  I'm thinking about a way to generalize the previous "virtual scroll" idea (one template that looks different on each page), but without requiring a script to generate it.  If the actual scrolling version goes away, we'll have to do something else.  I'm not thrilled with your version (6 templates), but it's certainly far better than a huge monstrosity.  -- [[user:Rick Block|Rick Block]] <small>([[user talk:Rick Block|talk]])</small> 19:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
570061 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570057 +++$+++ 570060 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.162005300E09 +++$+++ By the way, I think I have an idea what \"something else\" could be. I think I know how one could make a generic template that can take several parameters and automatically split it up into several different \"views\" like if it where several different templates. I just have to think a bit more about how to code it up. But I think it is doable. And only using the template logic (no javascript) that Wikimedia offers. -- +++$+++ ::::By the way, I think I have an idea what "something else" could be. I think I know how one could make a generic template that can take several parameters and automatically split it up into several different "views" like if it where several different templates. I just have to think a bit more about how to code it up. But I think it is doable. And only using the template logic (no javascript) that Wikimedia offers. --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 20:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
570062 +++$+++ Rick Block +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570057 +++$+++ 570061 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.162019700E09 +++$+++ Template by template, I suspect there's almost always \"something else\", although I do like the horizontal scroll approach because it's so simple to use. --  +++$+++ :::::Template by template, I suspect there's almost always "something else", although I do like the horizontal scroll approach because it's so simple to use. -- [[user:Rick Block|Rick Block]] <small>([[user talk:Rick Block|talk]])</small> 00:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

536760 +++$+++ ShakespeareFan00 +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536760 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-05 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.178419320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:ShakespeareFan00|ShakespeareFan00]] 19:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
536761 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 536760 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-06 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.178445480E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for the question. The music for episode 19 is \"Daydream\", a demonstration song packaged with Apple's [[Garageband]], the editing software we use to create the podcast. Apple actively encourages the use of the loops and tracks included with the software in users' productions, and (as far as I can tell) asserts no ownership over them. --  +++$+++ ::Hey, thanks for the question. The music for episode 19 is "Daydream", a demonstration song packaged with Apple's [[Garageband]], the editing software we use to create the podcast. Apple actively encourages the use of the loops and tracks included with the software in users' productions, and (as far as I can tell) asserts no ownership over them. -- [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydweeb]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Daveydweeb 2|'''review!''']]</sub></small>) 02:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

274618 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-28 04:20:00 +++$+++ 1.211973600E09 +++$+++ Seriously, this has been going on in one form or another since the last AUSPOL arbitration case three years ago and I don't seen any way to bring sanity to the table other than an ArbCom case that would turf out many editors or community based article probation but that requires a team of uninvolved editors and admins willing to come back to the articles and I know for many of us it is a case of once bitten twice shy, so unless folks are willing to help enforce an article probation we might be left with no choice but arbitration. Cheers all,  +++$+++ Seriously, this has been going on in one form or another since the last AUSPOL arbitration case three years ago and I don't seen any way to bring sanity to the table other than an ArbCom case that would turf out many editors or community based article probation but that requires a team of uninvolved editors and admins willing to come back to the articles and I know for many of us it is a case of once bitten twice shy, so unless folks are willing to help enforce an article probation we might be left with no choice but arbitration. Cheers all, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
274619 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274618 +++$+++ 274618 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.212003900E09 +++$+++ Sarah, my 2 cents on your 3 steps: \"Luv it, can't come soon enough\" - particularly step 3-- +++$+++ :Sarah, my 2 cents on your 3 steps: "Luv it, can't come soon enough" - particularly step 3--[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 12:45, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

274621 +++$+++ FastLizard4 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-28 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.211967360E09 +++$+++ Now that you have read the generic warnings, please read (or re-read if you have read it already) the [[Wikipedia:Request an account\/Guide|tool's documentation page]] which includes a link to the tool's request-filling interface.  If you ever need any help, I myself am an interface admin, so feel free to drop me a line on [[User talk:FastLizard4|my talk page]]!}}  --[[User:FastLizard4|<span style=\"color:#228B22\">'''FastLizard4'''<\/span>]] ([[user_talk:FastLizard4|Talk]]\u2022[[User:FastLizard4\/Links|Index]]\u2022 +++$+++ Now that you have read the generic warnings, please read (or re-read if you have read it already) the [[Wikipedia:Request an account/Guide|tool's documentation page]] which includes a link to the tool's request-filling interface.  If you ever need any help, I myself am an interface admin, so feel free to drop me a line on [[User talk:FastLizard4|my talk page]]!}}  --[[User:FastLizard4|<span style="color:#228B22">'''FastLizard4'''</span>]] ([[user_talk:FastLizard4|Talk]]•[[User:FastLizard4/Links|Index]]•[[User:FastLizard4/Guest book|Sign]]) 02:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
274622 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274621 +++$+++ 274621 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.211967840E09 +++$+++ Umm...that was insanely fast, FastLizard (you sure deserve your username!). Like professionally fast! I'm an admin so I don't need the accountcreator rights. Thank you very much for your speedy response. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Umm...that was insanely fast, FastLizard (you sure deserve your username!). Like professionally fast! I'm an admin so I don't need the accountcreator rights. Thank you very much for your speedy response. :) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
274623 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274621 +++$+++ 274621 +++$+++ 2008-05-31 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.212225060E09 +++$+++ No problems. I do agree the account looks rather strange and I'm curious to see whether I hear from him or not. :) All the best Lanki,  +++$+++ :No problems. I do agree the account looks rather strange and I'm curious to see whether I hear from him or not. :) All the best Lanki, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

274624 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274624 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-01 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.212312900E09 +++$+++ For the userright removal and your understanding over the matter! :) I haven't really done much with the account-creator right, and have pretty much stuck with giving out rollback for now. :)  +++$+++ For the userright removal and your understanding over the matter! :) I haven't really done much with the account-creator right, and have pretty much stuck with giving out rollback for now. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 02:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
274625 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274624 +++$+++ 274624 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.212313380E09 +++$+++ On a similar note, do you know where the policy page for account-creator is, assuming there is one? Thanks.  +++$+++ :On a similar note, do you know where the policy page for account-creator is, assuming there is one? Thanks. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 02:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
274626 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274624 +++$+++ 274625 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.212317160E09 +++$+++ To be honest, I don't know if there is a policy! I had a look around but all I could find was the page in the new admin school and Giggy's proposal here:  +++$+++ ::To be honest, I don't know if there is a policy! I had a look around but all I could find was the page in the new admin school and Giggy's proposal here: [[User:Dihydrogen_Monoxide/accountcreator_proposal]]. It's still fairly new and it doesn't really get given out much so possibly no one has really bothered to write a proper policy for it yet.  But my basic understanding of the right is that it just allows you to create more than six account per day. Administrators can create as many accounts as they need to but non-admins hit a wall once they've created six in one day and then have to wait until the next day to create more. So users helping with account creation requests were having to stop helping out once they'd done six and we get stacks of requests every day through the various lists, so it wasn't very helpful having editors forced to stop helping. So as far as I know, we've only been assigning the "accountcreator" right to editors who help with account creation, either through OTRS, the tool server, the account creation Requests mailing list or the unblock-en-l mailing list or socks belonging to admins who help with accoount creation requests. Those are the only people I've given it to personally and looking at the list of people with the right, they all seem to be account creators. The right is just useless to anyone who isn't helping with account creation because it doesn't do anything except allow you to create more than six accounts a day. I don't think it's a major security concern or anything but I do agree that it is a potential and unnecessary security risk that has no pay off if the person isn't helping with creating new account. If you ever decided to start helping with account creations, then I think it would be perfectly fine to add the right back onto your alt account. I hope you have a nice weekend. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:46, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
274627 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274624 +++$+++ 274626 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.212361800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the explanation!  +++$+++ :::Thanks for the explanation! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

12483 +++$+++ Mark t young +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-26 08:35:00 +++$+++ 1.214494500E09 +++$+++ I like your new navbox for extant crocodylians. Looks really good! Cheers,  +++$+++ I like your new navbox for extant crocodylians. Looks really good! Cheers, [[User:Mark t young|Mark t young]] ([[User talk:Mark t young|talk]]) 08:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
12484 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12483 +++$+++ 12483 +++$+++ 2008-08-02 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.217740440E09 +++$+++ Not on navbox, but still a croc... I don't know if it's a convention among croc specialists (herpetologists? I thought that was just snakes), but it's not in the real world. Caps are gone when I see 'em.   +++$+++ :Not on navbox, but still a croc... I don't know if it's a convention among croc specialists (herpetologists? I thought that was just snakes), but it's not in the real world. Caps are gone when I see 'em.  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>hit me ♠</small> </sup>]]</font> 22:14, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
12485 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12483 +++$+++ 12484 +++$+++ 2008-08-04 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.217894400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification. I'm always interested in the right term. (Sorry to take so long to reply. I missed the cmt somehow...)   +++$+++ ::Thanks for the clarification. I'm always interested in the right term. (Sorry to take so long to reply. I missed the cmt somehow...)  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>hit me ♠</small> </sup>]]</font> 17:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
12486 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12483 +++$+++ 12485 +++$+++ 2008-08-04 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.217911860E09 +++$+++ Don't stop there. I've seen abuse across WP. I'm adopting the box.   +++$+++ :::Don't stop there. I've seen abuse across WP. I'm adopting the box.  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>hit me ♠</small> </sup>]]</font> 21:48 & 21:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

274628 +++$+++ Bilby +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-03 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.212488580E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah! I noticed that you had reverted part of the above talk page to remove a BLP concern. While I can't see what you were reverting, it still contains the IP comment in regard to Peter Phelps. As I recall he had complained about the entry, so I just wanted to make sure that the comment you were trying to revet wasn't, in fact, that one. (I thought that comment had been deleted by another editor, but my memory isn't what it should be). -  +++$+++ Hi Sarah! I noticed that you had reverted part of the above talk page to remove a BLP concern. While I can't see what you were reverting, it still contains the IP comment in regard to Peter Phelps. As I recall he had complained about the entry, so I just wanted to make sure that the comment you were trying to revet wasn't, in fact, that one. (I thought that comment had been deleted by another editor, but my memory isn't what it should be). - [[User:Bilby|Bilby]] ([[User talk:Bilby|talk]]) 03:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
274629 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274628 +++$+++ 274628 +++$+++ 2008-06-03 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.212493620E09 +++$+++ Thank you for letting me know! He did complain about that comment and also emailed me about it so I reverted it yesterday but I thought about it overnight and thought, you know, to be fair and as difficult as the editor was being, it's really not fair to have personal and professional comments left in the history when it's on a page with such a small editing history (which makes it very easy to delete individual edits). So I deleted the page but I didn't realise the comment had been made in a series of edits separated by a whole lot of edits by Orderinchaos so when I restored the page I restored everything minus my reversion of the page and the IP's last edit which not only restored the material to the history but also to the page since I'd left my revert deleted. So thank you very much for telling me! I really appreciated it very much. :)  +++$+++ :Thank you for letting me know! He did complain about that comment and also emailed me about it so I reverted it yesterday but I thought about it overnight and thought, you know, to be fair and as difficult as the editor was being, it's really not fair to have personal and professional comments left in the history when it's on a page with such a small editing history (which makes it very easy to delete individual edits). So I deleted the page but I didn't realise the comment had been made in a series of edits separated by a whole lot of edits by Orderinchaos so when I restored the page I restored everything minus my reversion of the page and the IP's last edit which not only restored the material to the history but also to the page since I'd left my revert deleted. So thank you very much for telling me! I really appreciated it very much. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
274630 +++$+++ Bilby +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274628 +++$+++ 274629 +++$+++ 2008-06-03 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.212493920E09 +++$+++ No problems. :) I figured you were doing something like that, as it seemed like an excellent idea of yours to remove it from the history. -  +++$+++ :* No problems. :) I figured you were doing something like that, as it seemed like an excellent idea of yours to remove it from the history. - [[User:Bilby|Bilby]] ([[User talk:Bilby|talk]]) 04:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

524158 +++$+++  +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524158 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 23:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ 23:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
524159 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524158 +++$+++ 524158 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.188000420E09 +++$+++ I see someone else moved the page to [[Alexander (magician)]] - good enough? There is a \"[[Help:Moving a page|move]]\" link at the top of the page that you can use for such things, unless there is another article or redirect already at that location, you don't need to ask a [[Wikipedia:Administrator]]. -- +++$+++ : I see someone else moved the page to [[Alexander (magician)]] - good enough? There is a "[[Help:Moving a page|move]]" link at the top of the page that you can use for such things, unless there is another article or redirect already at that location, you don't need to ask a [[Wikipedia:Administrator]]. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 17:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

274631 +++$+++ Bonzai273 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274631 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-03 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.212502380E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but seeing an article get reverted to two sentences made me quickly jump to the conclusion of vandalism. Could you please revert the page to how it was before your edits, and we can quickly remove the areas with copyright violations without sacrificing all the other valuable edits that have been done? And in future, please post in the discussion before deleting an article, as I have put a large amount of time into it. Also, I was not the one who infringed copyright laws, in case you were wondering. -  +++$+++ Sorry, but seeing an article get reverted to two sentences made me quickly jump to the conclusion of vandalism. Could you please revert the page to how it was before your edits, and we can quickly remove the areas with copyright violations without sacrificing all the other valuable edits that have been done? And in future, please post in the discussion before deleting an article, as I have put a large amount of time into it. Also, I was not the one who infringed copyright laws, in case you were wondering. - [[User:Bonzai273|Bonzai273]] ([[User talk:Bonzai273|talk]]) 07:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
274632 +++$+++ Bonzai273 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274631 +++$+++ 274631 +++$+++ 2008-06-03 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.212503040E09 +++$+++ Wow, wait, you created [[user:User:Jk123 2099]].. ? Or maybe I'm just a noob at wikipedia. Anyway, sorry for the trouble, haven't ever come across a copyright violation, but now I know. Thanks for the help. -  +++$+++ :Wow, wait, you created [[user:User:Jk123 2099]].. ? Or maybe I'm just a noob at wikipedia. Anyway, sorry for the trouble, haven't ever come across a copyright violation, but now I know. Thanks for the help. - [[User:Bonzai273|Bonzai273]] ([[User talk:Bonzai273|talk]]) 07:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
274633 +++$+++ Bonzai273 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274631 +++$+++ 274632 +++$+++ 2008-06-03 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.212515340E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that's fine. Completely understandable too, so I'm not angry or anything. I really wouldn't unblock JIS, there are so many students there that I would see likely to try mess up wikipedia. It is a huge conflict of interest with him editing the article, as it has ended up more as a advertisement than an encyclopedia article. Just curious, can you block someone from a specific article? And I would like to work on that article more, but I'm very cautious of treading on toes, as he is admin for the school, and I'm a student, with a parent as a teacher... . I'll keep watching over it, and I'll message you if I see any issues. Well, thanks for intervening -  +++$+++ ::Yeah, that's fine. Completely understandable too, so I'm not angry or anything. I really wouldn't unblock JIS, there are so many students there that I would see likely to try mess up wikipedia. It is a huge conflict of interest with him editing the article, as it has ended up more as a advertisement than an encyclopedia article. Just curious, can you block someone from a specific article? And I would like to work on that article more, but I'm very cautious of treading on toes, as he is admin for the school, and I'm a student, with a parent as a teacher... . I'll keep watching over it, and I'll message you if I see any issues. Well, thanks for intervening - [[User:Bonzai273|Bonzai273]] ([[User talk:Bonzai273|talk]]) 10:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

12488 +++$+++ Mike_Searson +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-04 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.223169960E09 +++$+++ I'm in the middle of reviewing it[[Talk:Decline_in_amphibian_populations\/GA1]], but the ozone section needs sources.-- +++$+++ I'm in the middle of reviewing it[[Talk:Decline_in_amphibian_populations/GA1]], but the ozone section needs sources.--[[User:Mike Searson|'''Mike''']] - [[User_talk:Mike_Searson|'''Μολὼν λαβέ''']] 18:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
12489 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12488 +++$+++ 12488 +++$+++ 2008-10-04 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.223172900E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Yes check.svg|15px]] <s>I'll take a look at it in the next few days.<\/s>  +++$+++ :[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px]] <s>I'll take a look at it in the next few days.</s> [[User:Steveprutz|StevePrutz]] ([[User talk:Steveprutz#top|talk]]) 19:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

274634 +++$+++ Dario D. +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274634 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-04 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.212570240E09 +++$+++ Anyway, if you were to so desire, it would be quite nice if I got some assistance on the issue (or if you could alert other editors who might be able to help spare me having to slog through the rest of these procedures, since I don't have time for them, and will have to abandon the issue again if I it just drags on endlessly). I just presented a refined Criticisms section (here:[[Talk:Webby_Awards#Proposed_.28by_Dario_D..29_Heavily_Refined_Criticism_Section]]), and while I see it as flawless, true, and ultimately perfect, Wikidemo will ever persist in seeing its ruin... And, if you read through all that Wikidemo has ever said and done on the Webbys issue, you'll see that he's as nonsensically biased (and desperate) toward protecting the Webbys as one could possible imagine a person being. ''My'' motivation is simply that the awards are a pay-to-enter, pay-to-attend scam, which judges less than 2% of all websites out there, and yet passed itself off as \"the Oscars of the net.\" Slate and the Chicago Tribune think similar thoughts, and Wikidemo wants people to believe they somehow aren't valid enough. Under all the pressure, he finally offered a compromise: why not put a single, nearly harmless line at the end of the History section at the bottom of the page? ROFLMAO... I think not. -- +++$+++ Anyway, if you were to so desire, it would be quite nice if I got some assistance on the issue (or if you could alert other editors who might be able to help spare me having to slog through the rest of these procedures, since I don't have time for them, and will have to abandon the issue again if I it just drags on endlessly). I just presented a refined Criticisms section (here:[[Talk:Webby_Awards#Proposed_.28by_Dario_D..29_Heavily_Refined_Criticism_Section]]), and while I see it as flawless, true, and ultimately perfect, Wikidemo will ever persist in seeing its ruin... And, if you read through all that Wikidemo has ever said and done on the Webbys issue, you'll see that he's as nonsensically biased (and desperate) toward protecting the Webbys as one could possible imagine a person being. ''My'' motivation is simply that the awards are a pay-to-enter, pay-to-attend scam, which judges less than 2% of all websites out there, and yet passed itself off as "the Oscars of the net." Slate and the Chicago Tribune think similar thoughts, and Wikidemo wants people to believe they somehow aren't valid enough. Under all the pressure, he finally offered a compromise: why not put a single, nearly harmless line at the end of the History section at the bottom of the page? ROFLMAO... I think not. --[[User:Dario D.|Dario D.]] ([[User talk:Dario D.|talk]]) 02:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
274635 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274634 +++$+++ 274634 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.212572700E09 +++$+++ First of all, and most importantly, I didn't reach my conclusions about that page and your editing because of anything Wikidemo said or linked to. I reached my conclusions from my own observations of that page. You need to understand that Wikipedia has a core policy [[WP:AGF|Assume Good Faith]] that basically means that we assume that other people are acting in good faith even if we disagree with them. So though you and Wikidemo disagree on content issues, your constant accusations against him and assumptions of bad faith are putting you critically at odds with Wikipedia. Most of what you wrote above are assumptions of bad faith about Wikidemo and reading it was really quite difficult, so starting out with a string of AGF violations is not likely to get you off to a good start. You really need to stop assuming others are acting in bad faith or up to no good if you want to be effective here. As far as the content goes, I disagree with you and have done so since the start. I do not believe that what you want to add is suitable or appropriate. I don't think it meets [[WP:NPOV]] or [[WP:UNDUE]] and I much prefer the compromise proposed by Jeremy McCracken and if I were to decide to involve myself in the content discussion I would support Jeremy's version or something similar. That said, under the protection policy, we're not going to make edits to the article until you lot have reached a consensus so it would be better if you went back to the article's talk page and tried to reach an agreement with the other editors there so that a consensus can be reached and everyone can move on to other things. Also, 15 reverts *is* out of line! There's really no way around that because edit warring over the content is just not acceptable. Quite honestly, I think you're lucky that *we* have assumed good faith of *you* and tried to give you a chance as a new editor instead of jumping in and blocking you before now because the sterile edit warring is not an acceptable way to resolve content disputes and people have tried to explain that to you many times. Also, please note that while Wikidemo has been the most vocal about the content, he hasn't been the only editor reverting your criticism section. The content has been removed at various times by a variety of editors, not just Wikidemo.  +++$+++ :First of all, and most importantly, I didn't reach my conclusions about that page and your editing because of anything Wikidemo said or linked to. I reached my conclusions from my own observations of that page. You need to understand that Wikipedia has a core policy [[WP:AGF|Assume Good Faith]] that basically means that we assume that other people are acting in good faith even if we disagree with them. So though you and Wikidemo disagree on content issues, your constant accusations against him and assumptions of bad faith are putting you critically at odds with Wikipedia. Most of what you wrote above are assumptions of bad faith about Wikidemo and reading it was really quite difficult, so starting out with a string of AGF violations is not likely to get you off to a good start. You really need to stop assuming others are acting in bad faith or up to no good if you want to be effective here. As far as the content goes, I disagree with you and have done so since the start. I do not believe that what you want to add is suitable or appropriate. I don't think it meets [[WP:NPOV]] or [[WP:UNDUE]] and I much prefer the compromise proposed by Jeremy McCracken and if I were to decide to involve myself in the content discussion I would support Jeremy's version or something similar. That said, under the protection policy, we're not going to make edits to the article until you lot have reached a consensus so it would be better if you went back to the article's talk page and tried to reach an agreement with the other editors there so that a consensus can be reached and everyone can move on to other things. Also, 15 reverts *is* out of line! There's really no way around that because edit warring over the content is just not acceptable. Quite honestly, I think you're lucky that *we* have assumed good faith of *you* and tried to give you a chance as a new editor instead of jumping in and blocking you before now because the sterile edit warring is not an acceptable way to resolve content disputes and people have tried to explain that to you many times. Also, please note that while Wikidemo has been the most vocal about the content, he hasn't been the only editor reverting your criticism section. The content has been removed at various times by a variety of editors, not just Wikidemo. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
274636 +++$+++ Dario D. +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274634 +++$+++ 274635 +++$+++ 2008-06-08 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.212911220E09 +++$+++ Hmm, okay, I think I understand your stance on this... Thanks anyway. Btw, just an update: the Webby Awards dispute was resolved yesterday, in my favor, and the article was unlocked.-- +++$+++ ::Hmm, okay, I think I understand your stance on this... Thanks anyway. Btw, just an update: the Webby Awards dispute was resolved yesterday, in my favor, and the article was unlocked.--[[User:Dario D.|Dario D.]] ([[User talk:Dario D.|talk]]) 00:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
274637 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274634 +++$+++ 274636 +++$+++ 2008-06-08 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.212915240E09 +++$+++ Heh, that's an interesting way to describe it. :) It looks to me like a compromise was reached rather than it being resolved in anyone's favour. lol. But I'm glad that you were able to reach a consensus about the text and hopefully that will now be the end of the warring and personal dispute.  +++$+++ :::Heh, that's an interesting way to describe it. :) It looks to me like a compromise was reached rather than it being resolved in anyone's favour. lol. But I'm glad that you were able to reach a consensus about the text and hopefully that will now be the end of the warring and personal dispute. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

12492 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-26 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.225017600E09 +++$+++ Inre this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tim_and_Eric_Awesome_Show,_Great_Job!&diff=next&oldid=247570626 diff]: Good call. How could someone not see [http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt1277921\/ this]?  [http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm2657149\/ Howie Slater] is one the best Spielberg imperosnators working in LA... but only if he keeps his hat on. ''' +++$+++ Inre this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tim_and_Eric_Awesome_Show,_Great_Job!&diff=next&oldid=247570626 diff]: Good call. How could someone not see [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1277921/ this]?  [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2657149/ Howie Slater] is one the best Spielberg imperosnators working in LA... but only if he keeps his hat on. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 03:40, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
12493 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12492 +++$+++ 12492 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.225057140E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Thumb-up.png|20px]] Awesome job! I put a reference on the T&EASGJ episode.  +++$+++ :[[Image:Thumb-up.png|20px]] Awesome job! I put a reference on the T&EASGJ episode. [[User:Steveprutz|StevePrutz]] ([[User talk:Steveprutz#top|talk]]) 14:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
12494 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12492 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.225092180E09 +++$+++ And the spinoff section of TEASGJ has a [http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt1188970\/ imdb link] to [[Tim and Eric Nite Live!]] when it could simply be a wikilink. Opinion? Is this on purpose? ''' +++$+++ :::And the spinoff section of TEASGJ has a [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1188970/ imdb link] to [[Tim and Eric Nite Live!]] when it could simply be a wikilink. Opinion? Is this on purpose? '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 00:23, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
12495 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12492 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.225097280E09 +++$+++ I didn't do it, but I fixed it.  +++$+++ ::::I didn't do it, but I fixed it. [[User:Steveprutz|StevePrutz]] ([[User talk:Steveprutz#top|talk]]) 01:48, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
12496 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12492 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.225101240E09 +++$+++ And as a \"well done\", here's a couple \"Dr. Steve Brule\" missing citations for that section (\"edit\" here will get you the cut-n-paste): <ref>by Philip Brown, [http:\/\/www.thestar.com\/article\/487266 thestar.com], Augst 30 2008, \"Twisted minds spawn an Awesome Show\" (paragrph 10), Retrieved 10-26-2008<\/ref><ref>by Craig Compton, [http:\/\/news.toonzone.net\/article.php?ID=25742 toonzone.net], August 30 2008, \"Dragon*Con08: [Adult Swim] Panel Highlights\", \"Check It Out, With Dr. Steve Brule, Premiering Spring 2009\", Retrieved 10-26-2008<\/ref>   Best, ''' +++$+++ :::::And as a "well done", here's a couple "Dr. Steve Brule" missing citations for that section ("edit" here will get you the cut-n-paste): <ref>by Philip Brown, [http://www.thestar.com/article/487266 thestar.com], Augst 30 2008, "Twisted minds spawn an Awesome Show" (paragrph 10), Retrieved 10-26-2008</ref><ref>by Craig Compton, [http://news.toonzone.net/article.php?ID=25742 toonzone.net], August 30 2008, "Dragon*Con08: [Adult Swim] Panel Highlights", "Check It Out, With Dr. Steve Brule, Premiering Spring 2009", Retrieved 10-26-2008</ref>   Best, '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 02:54, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

274639 +++$+++ Damuna +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-07 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.212872640E09 +++$+++ I've been working to rewrite the [[Torm]] article in order to remove the in-universe style, and was wondering if you could check my work so far. Additionally, do you have any advice for tackling the \"History & Relationships\" section, which is likely to need a full rewrite? -- +++$+++ I've been working to rewrite the [[Torm]] article in order to remove the in-universe style, and was wondering if you could check my work so far. Additionally, do you have any advice for tackling the "History & Relationships" section, which is likely to need a full rewrite? --[[User:Damuna|Muna]] ([[User talk:Damuna|talk]]) 14:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
274640 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274639 +++$+++ 274639 +++$+++ 2008-06-08 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.212916080E09 +++$+++ Hey Muna. Well, I think your edits are a very good improvement. I'm glad that you added the reference list as it was sorely needing some citations. It would be good to find another reference to use as a cite for some of the other material so that it's not all cited to the FAP text. I'm not really sure about the History and Relationship section as I don't know much about Dungeons and Dragons other than what I have read on Wikipedia, but I think the important thing is to continue writing it neutrally and with inline sources where you can. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hey Muna. Well, I think your edits are a very good improvement. I'm glad that you added the reference list as it was sorely needing some citations. It would be good to find another reference to use as a cite for some of the other material so that it's not all cited to the FAP text. I'm not really sure about the History and Relationship section as I don't know much about Dungeons and Dragons other than what I have read on Wikipedia, but I think the important thing is to continue writing it neutrally and with inline sources where you can. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:08, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

12497 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-30 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.225381560E09 +++$+++ I also think the intro to [[Chelicerata]] is longer than I'd like. The problem is that the average reader has little prior knowledge of invertebrates. If you can suggest any ways to shorten the intro without bewildering  the average reader, I'd be very interested. --  +++$+++ I also think the intro to [[Chelicerata]] is longer than I'd like. The problem is that the average reader has little prior knowledge of invertebrates. If you can suggest any ways to shorten the intro without bewildering  the average reader, I'd be very interested. -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 08:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
12498 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12497 +++$+++ 12497 +++$+++ 2008-10-30 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.225402800E09 +++$+++ I setup the GAN template on the talk page. See the review page ([[Talk:Chelicerata\/GA1]]).  +++$+++ :I setup the GAN template on the talk page. See the review page ([[Talk:Chelicerata/GA1]]). [[User:Steveprutz|StevePrutz]] ([[User talk:Steveprutz#top|talk]]) 14:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

12500 +++$+++  +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12500 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-28 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.235813640E09 +++$+++ |You are invited to join the '''''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Guitarists\/Buckethead task force|Buckethead task force]]''''', a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to avant-garde guitarist '''[[Buckethead]]'''. If you would like to participate, you can visit the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Guitarists\/Buckethead task force|project page]], where you can join the project and\/or contribute to the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Guitarists\/Buckethead task force|discussion]]. --<small>''Avant-garde a clue''<\/small>-'''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ |You are invited to join the '''''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Guitarists/Buckethead task force|Buckethead task force]]''''', a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to avant-garde guitarist '''[[Buckethead]]'''. If you would like to participate, you can visit the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Guitarists/Buckethead task force|project page]], where you can join the project and/or contribute to the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Guitarists/Buckethead task force|discussion]]. --<small>''Avant-garde a clue''</small>-'''<font color="#000000">[[User:HexaChord|hexa]]</font><font color="#FF0000">[[User talk:HexaChord|Chord]]</font><sup><font color="#FFFF00">[[WP:BH|2]]</font></sup>''' 01:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
12501 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12500 +++$+++ 12500 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.235979000E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I don't have enough time in the coming months to commit.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I don't have enough time in the coming months to commit. [[User:Steveprutz|StevePrutz]] ([[User talk:Steveprutz#top|talk]]) 23:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

12502 +++$+++ Tombstone +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-09 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.228855140E09 +++$+++ Hello, Steveprutz! Please be sure not to do cut&paste page moves, instead please use the \"move\" tab or make a request on [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]]. If any other croc pages were cut&pasted, please list it on [[Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen]] so it can be repaired. Rgrds.-- +++$+++ Hello, Steveprutz! Please be sure not to do cut&paste page moves, instead please use the "move" tab or make a request on [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]]. If any other croc pages were cut&pasted, please list it on [[Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen]] so it can be repaired. Rgrds.--[[User:Tombstone|Tombstone]] ([[User talk:Tombstone|talk]]) 12:39, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
12503 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12502 +++$+++ 12502 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.228866660E09 +++$+++ Sorry. I figured MOVE would not work, because the move-to page already existed. I'll ask for help if there is a next time.  +++$+++ :Sorry. I figured MOVE would not work, because the move-to page already existed. I'll ask for help if there is a next time. [[User:Steveprutz|StevePrutz]] ([[User talk:Steveprutz#top|talk]]) 15:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

274647 +++$+++ Myheartinchile +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-10 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.213088700E09 +++$+++ respectfully, thats patent bull. the article in question uses youtube as a source dozens of times and the claims in question are represented in a video from the article's subject that he made and posted on youtube. it was the only source i had and its the only source for all the other videos besides \"Leave Brittany Alone\". I asked on the administrators reporting page and they said the warning was unwarranted. i don't think anything i claimed was controversial with regarads the to behavior and \"art\" that this individual is reported on in the context of this article or his life. see the video for yourself [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=9iuu_j67I2U&feature=related] if a video is not a reliable source for the subject at hand i don't know what is. +++$+++ respectfully, thats patent bull. the article in question uses youtube as a source dozens of times and the claims in question are represented in a video from the article's subject that he made and posted on youtube. it was the only source i had and its the only source for all the other videos besides "Leave Brittany Alone". I asked on the administrators reporting page and they said the warning was unwarranted. i don't think anything i claimed was controversial with regarads the to behavior and "art" that this individual is reported on in the context of this article or his life. see the video for yourself [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iuu_j67I2U&feature=related] if a video is not a reliable source for the subject at hand i don't know what is.[[User:Myheartinchile|Myheartinchile]] ([[User talk:Myheartinchile|talk]]) 02:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
274648 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274647 +++$+++ 274647 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.213089480E09 +++$+++ Please re-read the administrator's noticeboard [[Wikipedia:ANI#warning_removal]] - I was one of the admins who responded to you and none of us have said the warning was unwarranted. We have only said that you may remove the messages if you want to, which is something that all users on Wikipedia are allowed to do on their own talk page so long as they don't do it in a disruptive manner. No one on ANI has told you the warning was unwarranted. YouTube is not a reliable source, again, please read - [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], [[WP:V|verifiability ]] and [[WP:BLP|Biographies of Living People]]. Links to YouTube are used to link to the videos in question but they are not suitable to use as reliable sources for a blp and most certainly not for controversial claims like asserting that someone is in an incestuous relationship with their brother. If you want to make controversial claims, you need to find reliable sources as defined by Wikipedia and if you don't you are going to end up being the blocked. That's the bottom line, really. You can think it's \"patent bull\" if you wish but you've been warned by multiple admins now and if you continue to make such comments about living people without reliable sources (again, as defined by Wikipedia, not by your own opinion) then you will be blocked.  +++$+++ :Please re-read the administrator's noticeboard [[Wikipedia:ANI#warning_removal]] - I was one of the admins who responded to you and none of us have said the warning was unwarranted. We have only said that you may remove the messages if you want to, which is something that all users on Wikipedia are allowed to do on their own talk page so long as they don't do it in a disruptive manner. No one on ANI has told you the warning was unwarranted. YouTube is not a reliable source, again, please read - [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], [[WP:V|verifiability ]] and [[WP:BLP|Biographies of Living People]]. Links to YouTube are used to link to the videos in question but they are not suitable to use as reliable sources for a blp and most certainly not for controversial claims like asserting that someone is in an incestuous relationship with their brother. If you want to make controversial claims, you need to find reliable sources as defined by Wikipedia and if you don't you are going to end up being the blocked. That's the bottom line, really. You can think it's "patent bull" if you wish but you've been warned by multiple admins now and if you continue to make such comments about living people without reliable sources (again, as defined by Wikipedia, not by your own opinion) then you will be blocked. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
274649 +++$+++ Myheartinchile +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274647 +++$+++ 274648 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.213091280E09 +++$+++ well how can i talk about it then, how can i ask about it, if i'm not allowed to.? +++$+++ ::well how can i talk about it then, how can i ask about it, if i'm not allowed to.?[[User:Myheartinchile|Myheartinchile]] ([[User talk:Myheartinchile|talk]]) 02:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
274650 +++$+++ Benjiboi +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274647 +++$+++ 274649 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.213092660E09 +++$+++ Myheartinchile, as I've stated ''a few'' times now, it was the semantics and tone that got you into trouble. Your statement was that Crocker was is a incestuous relationship, instead you can simple link to the source (video in this case) and ask something like, this seems likes it's worth mentioning, anyone else agree or have seen it before? You could even state he seems to be in an incestuous relationship - is that true? It allows other editors to check the source and likely someone will respond with the correct info, in this case that it was a hoax.  +++$+++ :::Myheartinchile, as I've stated ''a few'' times now, it was the semantics and tone that got you into trouble. Your statement was that Crocker was is a incestuous relationship, instead you can simple link to the source (video in this case) and ask something like, this seems likes it's worth mentioning, anyone else agree or have seen it before? You could even state he seems to be in an incestuous relationship - is that true? It allows other editors to check the source and likely someone will respond with the correct info, in this case that it was a hoax. [[User:Benjiboi|<small><u style="text-decoration:none;font-family: papyrus;color:#CC00CC">Banje</u></small>]][[User_talk:Benjiboi|<u style="font-family: Zapfino, sans-serif;color:#8000FF">boi</u>]] 03:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
274651 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274647 +++$+++ 274648 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.213098600E09 +++$+++ As explained by others, you need to be careful with how you phrase comments on biographies. That question you asked was phrased as though it were a statement of fact and that is a large part of the problem. The other thing is that if it is something likely to be considered controversial or something that might be considered libelous, then you need to have a link to a source. Also, remember that article talk pages are for discussing the article only, not for discussing gossip so it's really not the place to go to to ask if something is true or not.   +++$+++ ::As explained by others, you need to be careful with how you phrase comments on biographies. That question you asked was phrased as though it were a statement of fact and that is a large part of the problem. The other thing is that if it is something likely to be considered controversial or something that might be considered libelous, then you need to have a link to a source. Also, remember that article talk pages are for discussing the article only, not for discussing gossip so it's really not the place to go to to ask if something is true or not.  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
274652 +++$+++ Benjiboi +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274647 +++$+++ 274651 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.213155900E09 +++$+++ Fair enough about the \"is this true or not\" concept, in this case the subject of the article posted a hoax video so some confusion is understandable.  +++$+++ :::Fair enough about the "is this true or not" concept, in this case the subject of the article posted a hoax video so some confusion is understandable. [[User:Benjiboi|<small><u style="text-decoration:none;font-family: papyrus;color:#CC00CC">Banje</u></small>]][[User_talk:Benjiboi|<u style="font-family: Zapfino, sans-serif;color:#8000FF">boi</u>]] 20:45, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

12505 +++$+++ Mick gold +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12505 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-08 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.234148880E09 +++$+++ Hi Steve, I've added refs & cites to this article. Do you think it still needs a warning about lack of refs\/citations?  +++$+++ Hi Steve, I've added refs & cites to this article. Do you think it still needs a warning about lack of refs/citations? [[User:Mick gold|Mick gold]] ([[User talk:Mick gold|talk]]) 19:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
12506 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12505 +++$+++ 12505 +++$+++ 2009-02-09 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.234245840E09 +++$+++ Great job!  +++$+++ :Great job! [[User:Steveprutz|StevePrutz]] ([[User talk:Steveprutz#top|talk]]) 22:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

536794 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-15 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.121491920E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux, Since you didn't respond to my answer to your question on my talk page, I've decided to copy your question and my response to here (just in case you didn't see it there &mdash; if you just didn't have anything to say that's ok ;-) I also wanted to add to what I said below that another great advantage to the \"[http:\/\/www.perseus.tufts.edu\/ Perseus]\" site is that you can search individual works. I've also converted the inline citations in [[Achaeus (general)]] to footnotes, and you can see how they work, and how the links to the specific passages work. Regards,  +++$+++ Hi Aldux, Since you didn't respond to my answer to your question on my talk page, I've decided to copy your question and my response to here (just in case you didn't see it there &mdash; if you just didn't have anything to say that's ok ;-) I also wanted to add to what I said below that another great advantage to the "[http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/ Perseus]" site is that you can search individual works. I've also converted the inline citations in [[Achaeus (general)]] to footnotes, and you can see how they work, and how the links to the specific passages work. Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:32, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
536795 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536794 +++$+++ 536794 +++$+++ 2005-07-14 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.121395500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:45, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

12507 +++$+++ Bugboy52.40 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-17 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.242626220E09 +++$+++ Do you have any pictures.  +++$+++ Do you have any pictures. [[User:Bugboy52.40|Bugboy52.4]] ([[User talk:Bugboy52.40|talk]]) 22:57, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
12508 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12507 +++$+++ 12507 +++$+++ 2009-05-17 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.242627060E09 +++$+++ I do have a photo, but didn't feel like subjecting Wikipedia to \"File:Unidentified Mantid Nymph#308.jpg\"... Species occurrence was exactly what I was looking for. Mine looks very similar to a nymph photo on the ''T. sinensis'' article. Very interesting how many exotics I assume are native.  +++$+++ :I do have a photo, but didn't feel like subjecting Wikipedia to "File:Unidentified Mantid Nymph#308.jpg"... Species occurrence was exactly what I was looking for. Mine looks very similar to a nymph photo on the ''T. sinensis'' article. Very interesting how many exotics I assume are native. [[User:Steveprutz|StevePrutz]] ([[User talk:Steveprutz#top|talk]]) 23:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
12509 +++$+++ Bugboy52.40 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12507 +++$+++ 12508 +++$+++ 2009-05-17 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.242628140E09 +++$+++ I guess my book doesn't cover ''all'' species, but it could just as well be ''T. aridifolia'' as it could be ''T. sinensis'', hard to say when thet are so young, were did you get a hold of them anyway?  +++$+++ ::I guess my book doesn't cover ''all'' species, but it could just as well be ''T. aridifolia'' as it could be ''T. sinensis'', hard to say when thet are so young, were did you get a hold of them anyway? [[User:Bugboy52.40|Bugboy52.4]] ([[User talk:Bugboy52.40|talk]]) 23:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
12510 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12507 +++$+++ 12509 +++$+++ 2009-05-17 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.242629880E09 +++$+++ I found the mantid in my front yard, which is surrounded by cattle fields. I'll upload one of the best shots. Please categorize it on Commons if you can do so.  +++$+++ :::I found the mantid in my front yard, which is surrounded by cattle fields. I'll upload one of the best shots. Please categorize it on Commons if you can do so. [[User:Steveprutz|StevePrutz]] ([[User talk:Steveprutz#top|talk]]) 23:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
12511 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12507 +++$+++ 12510 +++$+++ 2009-05-18 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.242630180E09 +++$+++ [[File:Cropped mantid on thumb.gif]]  +++$+++ ::::[[File:Cropped mantid on thumb.gif]] [[User:Steveprutz|StevePrutz]] ([[User talk:Steveprutz#top|talk]]) 00:03, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

499381 +++$+++ Redreadersdigest +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-05 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.165307220E09 +++$+++ How about we take this arguement to the next level? Yeah, that's right, bitch. I'm talking about ''e-mail''.  +++$+++ How about we take this arguement to the next level? Yeah, that's right, bitch. I'm talking about ''e-mail''. [[User:Redreadersdigest|Redreadersdigest]] 00:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
499382 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daveydweeb +++$+++ 499381 +++$+++ 499381 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.165308300E09 +++$+++ Or, you could take it to deletion review. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Daveydweeb\/Esperanza|ee]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Or, you could take it to deletion review. [[User:Daveydweeb|Daveydw]]<font color="green">[[User:Daveydweeb/Esperanza|ee]]</font>[[User:Daveydweeb|b]] (<small><sup>[[User talk:Daveydweeb|'''chat''']]</sup>/<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Daveydweeb 2|'''review!''']]</sub></small>) 00:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

536798 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-17 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.124319060E09 +++$+++ As for Firenze, alas!, I've just finished my post-university studies and I've returned home. Not that I've gone very far away: I'm just fifty miles upstream where the river [[Arno]] passes by Firenze, in a small town called Subbiano, near [[Arezzo]]. As for November, I must confess its to early to answer, since much depends on where the Public Education ministry decides to send me, which is for now a mistery. But if I can I'd be happy to meet you :-)  +++$+++ As for Firenze, alas!, I've just finished my post-university studies and I've returned home. Not that I've gone very far away: I'm just fifty miles upstream where the river [[Arno]] passes by Firenze, in a small town called Subbiano, near [[Arezzo]]. As for November, I must confess its to early to answer, since much depends on where the Public Education ministry decides to send me, which is for now a mistery. But if I can I'd be happy to meet you :-) [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 15:51, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
536799 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536798 +++$+++ 536798 +++$+++ 2005-08-17 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.124313480E09 +++$+++ OK, we can chat again when it gets closer to November ;-)  +++$+++ :OK, we can chat again when it gets closer to November ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:18, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

526373 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526373 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-17 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.163764080E09 +++$+++ Could you ask a knowledgeable person to add needed refs at [[Robert Baden-Powell, 1st Baron Baden-Powell]], see [[Wikipedia:Good_articles\/Disputes#Robert_Baden-Powell.2C_1st_Baron_Baden-Powell]].  +++$+++ Could you ask a knowledgeable person to add needed refs at [[Robert Baden-Powell, 1st Baron Baden-Powell]], see [[Wikipedia:Good_articles/Disputes#Robert_Baden-Powell.2C_1st_Baron_Baden-Powell]]. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 03:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
526374 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526373 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.163792280E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I found a few of my own too.  +++$+++ ::Thanks! I found a few of my own too. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 11:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

274657 +++$+++ RS1900 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-12 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.213298100E09 +++$+++ You should have checked my behavior with other editors. I have never said anything wrong about anybody. I have attacked only one person- Nick Graves. I would also like you to see my contributions in the past. It will give you an idea whether I should be desperately need to be blocked from editing or not. Thank you.  +++$+++ You should have checked my behavior with other editors. I have never said anything wrong about anybody. I have attacked only one person- Nick Graves. I would also like you to see my contributions in the past. It will give you an idea whether I should be desperately need to be blocked from editing or not. Thank you. [[User:RS1900|RS1900]] 12:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
274658 +++$+++ RS1900 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274657 +++$+++ 274657 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.213298940E09 +++$+++ Sarah, I am not making excuse for my behavior. I shouldn't have made those comments on the talk page of Nick Graves. It was my mistake. I will never make such comments in future. Thank you.  +++$+++ :Sarah, I am not making excuse for my behavior. I shouldn't have made those comments on the talk page of Nick Graves. It was my mistake. I will never make such comments in future. Thank you. [[User:RS1900|RS1900]] 12:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

105165 +++$+++ Adriatikus +++$+++ Illythr +++$+++ 105165 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-26 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.296032700E09 +++$+++ I had to check the ''user contributions'' to see if you're still breathing. For most, a mirror suffices. In your case one has to ''wiki''check your vital signs. :P  +++$+++ I had to check the ''user contributions'' to see if you're still breathing. For most, a mirror suffices. In your case one has to ''wiki''check your vital signs. :P [[User:Adriatikus|<font color="#174469"><b>a</b>driatikus</font>]] <b>|</b> <small>[[User talk:Adriatikus|<font color="#F17918">talk</font>]]</small> 01:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
105166 +++$+++ Illythr +++$+++ Illythr +++$+++ 105165 +++$+++ 105165 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.296050100E09 +++$+++ I'm still around my usual haunts, including icq, just not as frequently or regularly. Till the end of the month, at least. -- +++$+++ : I'm still around my usual haunts, including icq, just not as frequently or regularly. Till the end of the month, at least. --[[User:Illythr|illythr]] ([[User talk:Illythr#top|talk]]) 05:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

274659 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-12 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.213300800E09 +++$+++ (after multipled edit conflicts)I checked your behaviour and your contributions myself at the time, as did numerous other admins who reviewed your edits and the block and it was subject of extensive discussion on and off-site so your suggestion that I should have checked with others is silly. You violated Wikipedia's policies and were blocked rightly for it; you've been given a second chance and instead of being productive you come here to moan about a comment I made more than six months ago, that I still stand by, and to pursue your now year-old vendetta against Nick?  +++$+++ (after multipled edit conflicts)I checked your behaviour and your contributions myself at the time, as did numerous other admins who reviewed your edits and the block and it was subject of extensive discussion on and off-site so your suggestion that I should have checked with others is silly. You violated Wikipedia's policies and were blocked rightly for it; you've been given a second chance and instead of being productive you come here to moan about a comment I made more than six months ago, that I still stand by, and to pursue your now year-old vendetta against Nick? [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
274660 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274659 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.213300800E09 +++$+++ You *are* trying to excuse it. You just told me you did what you did because of some off-Wiki dispute and that you've never done anything wrong (yet the block log, the histories of your accounts, the ANI discussions and unblock list threads totally belies that claim. I strongly suggest you use this opportunity to make a new start and leave the past in the past. If you are simply here to pursue revenge or \"punishment\" for Nick then you are going to be very disappointed because we don't do \"punishments\" here, particularly not for some private and off Wikipedia dispute. Now, if Nick posts personal information about you, *then* we will have something to talk about but at this point you're asking me to take your word for what happened in some private dispute and take administrative action based on it? Also, you say this happened in \"June-July 2008\" yet we are only just in June 2008 right now, so I can only assume that you are talking about June-July 2007, i.e a year ago? If that's the case, then just get over it already! Please! No admin is going to \"punish\" Nick for some stupid thing he said but didn't actually do 12 months ago; sorry but that just isn't going to happen. You need to learn to leave your off-Wiki disputes off-wiki. This isn't a battlefield and it isn't a venue to pursue revenge or a vendetta. If you are here to contribute to building this encyclopedia, then please go and edit the encyclopedia productively; but if you are just here to pursue revenge then you need to go and find something else to do elsewhere.  +++$+++ ::You *are* trying to excuse it. You just told me you did what you did because of some off-Wiki dispute and that you've never done anything wrong (yet the block log, the histories of your accounts, the ANI discussions and unblock list threads totally belies that claim. I strongly suggest you use this opportunity to make a new start and leave the past in the past. If you are simply here to pursue revenge or "punishment" for Nick then you are going to be very disappointed because we don't do "punishments" here, particularly not for some private and off Wikipedia dispute. Now, if Nick posts personal information about you, *then* we will have something to talk about but at this point you're asking me to take your word for what happened in some private dispute and take administrative action based on it? Also, you say this happened in "June-July 2008" yet we are only just in June 2008 right now, so I can only assume that you are talking about June-July 2007, i.e a year ago? If that's the case, then just get over it already! Please! No admin is going to "punish" Nick for some stupid thing he said but didn't actually do 12 months ago; sorry but that just isn't going to happen. You need to learn to leave your off-Wiki disputes off-wiki. This isn't a battlefield and it isn't a venue to pursue revenge or a vendetta. If you are here to contribute to building this encyclopedia, then please go and edit the encyclopedia productively; but if you are just here to pursue revenge then you need to go and find something else to do elsewhere. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
274661 +++$+++ RS1900 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274659 +++$+++ 274659 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.213302660E09 +++$+++ Sarah, I am not saying that I have never done anything wrong. I have done some terrible things and I admit my mistakes. I am embarrassed about those mistakes. I will try to be a constructive editor again. Thank you.  +++$+++ :Sarah, I am not saying that I have never done anything wrong. I have done some terrible things and I admit my mistakes. I am embarrassed about those mistakes. I will try to be a constructive editor again. Thank you. [[User:RS1900|RS1900]] 13:31, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
274662 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274659 +++$+++ 274661 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.213304520E09 +++$+++ (ec)well, I am glad that you intend being a constructive editor again. I think you would get off to a better start, however, if you left one year old incidents in the past and just resumed editing instead of pursuing each administrator who participated in the discussion last year and pressing for \"punishment\" for Nick for a one year old off-wikipedia dispute. This seems to me to be a very bad way to resume editing as it is just going to bring unfavourable attention on yourself but as you wish. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::(ec)well, I am glad that you intend being a constructive editor again. I think you would get off to a better start, however, if you left one year old incidents in the past and just resumed editing instead of pursuing each administrator who participated in the discussion last year and pressing for "punishment" for Nick for a one year old off-wikipedia dispute. This seems to me to be a very bad way to resume editing as it is just going to bring unfavourable attention on yourself but as you wish. Thanks, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
274663 +++$+++ RS1900 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274659 +++$+++ 274659 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.213303860E09 +++$+++ I am not trying to spamming all the administrators and editors who participated in the discussion more than six months ago. I just posted messages on your talk page and the talk page of [[User:Philippe\u200e]].  +++$+++ :I am not trying to spamming all the administrators and editors who participated in the discussion more than six months ago. I just posted messages on your talk page and the talk page of [[User:Philippe‎]]. [[User:RS1900|RS1900]] 13:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
274664 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274659 +++$+++ 274663 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.213304520E09 +++$+++ Yes, I see. I'm glad that you have stopped because it seems a bad way to return to editing Wikipedia. The facts are that we don't block to \"punish\" here, we block to prevent disruption. Thus there is no justification for blocking Nick for something he said to you off-site a year ago. Nick was instrumental in getting your account unblocked and if it wasn't for him pressing for a second chance for you, it is likely you would still be blocked, so I think you should also put your past disputes aside. I can only urge you to go back to editing the mainspace and forget trying to pursue admins to get punishment for Nick because it's just not going to happen and you will wind up being blocked for disruption again. Specially with the various records of your previous accounts. Please consider going and making useful edits to the mainspace. thanks.  +++$+++ ::Yes, I see. I'm glad that you have stopped because it seems a bad way to return to editing Wikipedia. The facts are that we don't block to "punish" here, we block to prevent disruption. Thus there is no justification for blocking Nick for something he said to you off-site a year ago. Nick was instrumental in getting your account unblocked and if it wasn't for him pressing for a second chance for you, it is likely you would still be blocked, so I think you should also put your past disputes aside. I can only urge you to go back to editing the mainspace and forget trying to pursue admins to get punishment for Nick because it's just not going to happen and you will wind up being blocked for disruption again. Specially with the various records of your previous accounts. Please consider going and making useful edits to the mainspace. thanks. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

12516 +++$+++ Petter Bøckman +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12516 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-20 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.285047540E09 +++$+++ I see from the edit history of [[Poikilotherm]] you are the originator of the information that poikilotherms (particularly frogs) need large genoms due to needing multiple enzymes to function over a wide temperature spectre. Do you have some sort of citable reference for it? I have tried searching through google scolar, but have so far come up empty handed.  +++$+++ I see from the edit history of [[Poikilotherm]] you are the originator of the information that poikilotherms (particularly frogs) need large genoms due to needing multiple enzymes to function over a wide temperature spectre. Do you have some sort of citable reference for it? I have tried searching through google scolar, but have so far come up empty handed. [[User:Petter Bøckman|Petter Bøckman]] ([[User talk:Petter Bøckman|talk]]) 22:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
12517 +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12516 +++$+++ 12516 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.285063140E09 +++$+++ Only interest I had in thermoregulation was making a navbox. I have knowledge of frogs, but not frog genomes.  +++$+++ :Only interest I had in thermoregulation was making a navbox. I have knowledge of frogs, but not frog genomes. [[User:Steveprutz|StevePrutz]] ([[User talk:Steveprutz#top|talk]]) 02:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
12518 +++$+++ Petter Bøckman +++$+++ Steveprutz +++$+++ 12516 +++$+++ 12517 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.285078680E09 +++$+++ OK,thanks.-- +++$+++ ::OK,thanks.--[[User:Petter Bøckman|Petter Bøckman]] ([[User talk:Petter Bøckman|talk]]) 07:18, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

536805 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536805 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-08 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.128825300E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux. I am coming to Firenze, sooner than I told you, I will arrive on October 23, and I will leave on November 11. I will be visiting American friends of mine who are in Firenza now. I will also be traveling south to Calabria sometime during this period. So anyway if you are still in the area, and you want to make your way to the city, it might be fun to meet up somewhere, sometime ;-) Ciao &mdash;  +++$+++ Hi Aldux. I am coming to Firenze, sooner than I told you, I will arrive on October 23, and I will leave on November 11. I will be visiting American friends of mine who are in Firenza now. I will also be traveling south to Calabria sometime during this period. So anyway if you are still in the area, and you want to make your way to the city, it might be fun to meet up somewhere, sometime ;-) Ciao &mdash; [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:35, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
536806 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536805 +++$+++ 536805 +++$+++ 2005-10-09 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.128896640E09 +++$+++ Why not? I do make a jump to Firenze now and then, so it may be possible to meet somewhere :-) Hoping all goes well, ''ci si vede'' (i.e. see you) ;-)  +++$+++ :Why not? I do make a jump to Firenze now and then, so it may be possible to meet somewhere :-) Hoping all goes well, ''ci si vede'' (i.e. see you) ;-) [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 15:24, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

274665 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274665 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-13 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.213367100E09 +++$+++ Hi the admin [[User:Orderinchaos]] has locked article [[Joe Hockey]] for over two weeks now. I feel the anti-Hockey election propaganda on his page is POV and not appropriate for a BLP because it contains a caricature of Hockey. Rather than support this, [[User:Orderinchaos]] has locked the article with the image still in it. Am I being unreasonable, or is this unfair use of admin powers? -- +++$+++ Hi the admin [[User:Orderinchaos]] has locked article [[Joe Hockey]] for over two weeks now. I feel the anti-Hockey election propaganda on his page is POV and not appropriate for a BLP because it contains a caricature of Hockey. Rather than support this, [[User:Orderinchaos]] has locked the article with the image still in it. Am I being unreasonable, or is this unfair use of admin powers? --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 07:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
274666 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274665 +++$+++ 274665 +++$+++ 2008-06-13 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.213372380E09 +++$+++ I think you are assuming bad faith of another user. Orderinchaos is quite a reasonable fellow in my opinion and I'm sure if you were to go and discuss your concerns with him in a reasonable and calm manner he would be most receptive. I'm not willing to overturn his action myself when you have present your case with an accusatory tone and this underlying sense that he has abused his tools or done something wrong when he has not from what I can see. AGF will get you much further around these parts.  +++$+++ :I think you are assuming bad faith of another user. Orderinchaos is quite a reasonable fellow in my opinion and I'm sure if you were to go and discuss your concerns with him in a reasonable and calm manner he would be most receptive. I'm not willing to overturn his action myself when you have present your case with an accusatory tone and this underlying sense that he has abused his tools or done something wrong when he has not from what I can see. AGF will get you much further around these parts. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

536810 +++$+++ Gurubrahma +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536810 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-29 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.130592660E09 +++$+++ Hi, this is in response to your comment on the merger. As the other article says that Purushottama may have been Porus, it is prudent to wait. Not all wikipedians would be active on a daily basis and a week wouldn't hurt either ways. btw, I believe that I shd have the privilege to merge the articles as I have tagged them and initiated the discussion. ;) -- +++$+++ Hi, this is in response to your comment on the merger. As the other article says that Purushottama may have been Porus, it is prudent to wait. Not all wikipedians would be active on a daily basis and a week wouldn't hurt either ways. btw, I believe that I shd have the privilege to merge the articles as I have tagged them and initiated the discussion. ;) --[[User:Gurubrahma|Gurubrahma]] 06:31, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
536811 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536810 +++$+++ 536810 +++$+++ 2005-10-29 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.130605200E09 +++$+++ Your obviously wright, Gurubrahma; as the first who put the tag you have a right of precedence in the merging ;-) Give a look at this [http:\/\/www.livius.org\/pn-po\/porus\/porus.htm article], maybe it can be useful.  +++$+++ :Your obviously wright, Gurubrahma; as the first who put the tag you have a right of precedence in the merging ;-) Give a look at this [http://www.livius.org/pn-po/porus/porus.htm article], maybe it can be useful. [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 10:00, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

274668 +++$+++ Timeshift9 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274668 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-17 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.213711080E09 +++$+++ It was protected after one IP edit for a reason. I would suggest to speak to Orderinchaos as i'm not at liberty to discuss such things here.  +++$+++ It was protected after one IP edit for a reason. I would suggest to speak to Orderinchaos as i'm not at liberty to discuss such things here. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 06:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
274669 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274668 +++$+++ 274668 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.213711260E09 +++$+++ I have already sent him multiple emails about it. I'm responding to OTRS tickets about the page and I agree it is suffering from UNDUE-weight. About 2\/3s of the article is about one dispute and much of that information wasn't even about Laning but about other people.  +++$+++ :I have already sent him multiple emails about it. I'm responding to OTRS tickets about the page and I agree it is suffering from UNDUE-weight. About 2/3s of the article is about one dispute and much of that information wasn't even about Laning but about other people. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
274670 +++$+++ Timeshift9 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274668 +++$+++ 274669 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.213711980E09 +++$+++ Well the issue was only [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Andrew_Laming&oldid=186238397 this big] until anon IPs (QLD liberal staffers to be precise) came and waged war. OIC then expanded on the issue which I would say that indeed inadvertent undue weight is now an issue.  +++$+++ ::Well the issue was only [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrew_Laming&oldid=186238397 this big] until anon IPs (QLD liberal staffers to be precise) came and waged war. OIC then expanded on the issue which I would say that indeed inadvertent undue weight is now an issue. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 07:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
274671 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274668 +++$+++ 274670 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.213712700E09 +++$+++ Understood. Thanks for that info. It's a shame but sadly not surprising that people have been using it for political purposes. I think I know who made the edit yesterday and I have asked them to refrain from making edits to the article while we try to sort it out.  +++$+++ :::Understood. Thanks for that info. It's a shame but sadly not surprising that people have been using it for political purposes. I think I know who made the edit yesterday and I have asked them to refrain from making edits to the article while we try to sort it out. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
274672 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274668 +++$+++ 274671 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.213713180E09 +++$+++ Note that I only *semi*-protected it - I noted it was a Gold Coast iPrimus IP before doing so, which was consistent with earlier editing on it. A few months ago, we had rashes of IP vandalism which turned out to be related to opponents of Laming's faction within the party - some of them attempted to implicate an unrelated Queensland Liberal in the situation. The end result of that was my rewrite of the section. Definitely bits of it can be reviewed as time goes on, as I was trying for a full and balanced account, but that may not be as necessary as it was. The problem with these disputes is that I researched only the one part - if the article covered more of his pre-parliamentary and parliamentary career, it wouldn't be 2\/3 of the article.  +++$+++ ::::Note that I only *semi*-protected it - I noted it was a Gold Coast iPrimus IP before doing so, which was consistent with earlier editing on it. A few months ago, we had rashes of IP vandalism which turned out to be related to opponents of Laming's faction within the party - some of them attempted to implicate an unrelated Queensland Liberal in the situation. The end result of that was my rewrite of the section. Definitely bits of it can be reviewed as time goes on, as I was trying for a full and balanced account, but that may not be as necessary as it was. The problem with these disputes is that I researched only the one part - if the article covered more of his pre-parliamentary and parliamentary career, it wouldn't be 2/3 of the article. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 07:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
274673 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274668 +++$+++ 274672 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.213715880E09 +++$+++ I know you only semi'd it but it had only been edited once in a couple of months and that edit was arguably good faith rather than vandalism and the [[WP:SEMI]] policy doesn't provide for that kind of protection. It actually explicitly forbids using semi-protection pre-emptively. We're supposed to be \"the encyclopedia anyone can edit, yes anyone! Right now and without waiting to be auto-confirmed!\" As far as the article goes, the problem I see is not with documenting what happened but with the weighting of it. If this was a regular biography, I would think this warranted two sentences - \"He was investigated. He wasn't charged.\" But the political aspects of it makes it more noteworthy and I personally don't see why it should cover more than say a paragraph sectioned in with other stuff he has done in his career. Surely he has done more than be elected and be investigated by the police. Anyway, I think Gnang's edits have been a great improvement and hopefully we'll be able to work more on it and make the article more rounded.  +++$+++ :::::I know you only semi'd it but it had only been edited once in a couple of months and that edit was arguably good faith rather than vandalism and the [[WP:SEMI]] policy doesn't provide for that kind of protection. It actually explicitly forbids using semi-protection pre-emptively. We're supposed to be "the encyclopedia anyone can edit, yes anyone! Right now and without waiting to be auto-confirmed!" As far as the article goes, the problem I see is not with documenting what happened but with the weighting of it. If this was a regular biography, I would think this warranted two sentences - "He was investigated. He wasn't charged." But the political aspects of it makes it more noteworthy and I personally don't see why it should cover more than say a paragraph sectioned in with other stuff he has done in his career. Surely he has done more than be elected and be investigated by the police. Anyway, I think Gnang's edits have been a great improvement and hopefully we'll be able to work more on it and make the article more rounded. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:18, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

45778 +++$+++ Sross (Public Policy) +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ 45778 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-08 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.297222260E09 +++$+++ I hope to hear from you soon.-- +++$+++ I hope to hear from you soon.--[[User:Sross (Public Policy)|Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Sross (Public Policy)|talk]]) 19:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
45779 +++$+++ Nvvchar +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ 45778 +++$+++ 45778 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.297335180E09 +++$+++ I had missed the obvious. Thanks for the review.--''' +++$+++ : I had missed the obvious. Thanks for the review.--'''[[User talk:Nvvchar|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#003366">Nvvchar</span>]]'''. 02:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

482685 +++$+++ Sune Ugerud +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-01 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.175443140E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Sune Ugerud|Sune Ugerud]] 08:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
482686 +++$+++ Sune Ugerud +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482685 +++$+++ 482685 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.175444760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Sune Ugerud|Sune Ugerud]] 09:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

12528 +++$+++ Awien +++$+++ JGKlein +++$+++ 12528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-18 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.279436820E09 +++$+++ Mahalo nui loa for the picture of the late lamented Kaim\u016b. What was bl**dy Pele thinking anyway?!? Now you wouldn't happen to have any of the late lamented Kalapana too, would you? Cheers,  +++$+++ Mahalo nui loa for the picture of the late lamented Kaimū. What was bl**dy Pele thinking anyway?!? Now you wouldn't happen to have any of the late lamented Kalapana too, would you? Cheers, [[User:Awien|Awien]] ([[User talk:Awien|talk]]) 00:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
12529 +++$+++ JGKlein +++$+++ JGKlein +++$+++ 12528 +++$+++ 12528 +++$+++ 2010-07-18 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.279440600E09 +++$+++ Glad you are enjoying the pictures. And thanks for saying aloha!  +++$+++ :Glad you are enjoying the pictures. And thanks for saying aloha! [[User:JGKlein|JGKlein]] ([[User talk:JGKlein#top|talk]]) 01:10, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

12530 +++$+++ DoctorJoeE +++$+++ JGKlein +++$+++ 12530 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-18 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.279494780E09 +++$+++ Also, do you happen to have a shot of the Parkyakarkus star? It's such an absurd name, and I'd love to be able to add a photo of that star to the article, but couldn't find one in the public domain. Thanks for your note! +++$+++ Also, do you happen to have a shot of the Parkyakarkus star? It's such an absurd name, and I'd love to be able to add a photo of that star to the article, but couldn't find one in the public domain. Thanks for your note![[User:DoctorJoeE|DoctorJoeE]] ([[User talk:DoctorJoeE|talk]]) 16:13, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
12531 +++$+++ DoctorJoeE +++$+++ JGKlein +++$+++ 12530 +++$+++ 12530 +++$+++ 2010-07-26 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.280183940E09 +++$+++ Hi -- Did you mention that you have a recent photo of the Monty Woolley star?  As you may have noticed, I generated a mini-controversy because somebody looked that the HWOF.com entry -- which is wrong -- those photos are photoshopped.  The LATimes Starwalk Project photo is genuine, but if you have a recent photo you could contribute, that would remove all doubt.  Thanks!  +++$+++ :Hi -- Did you mention that you have a recent photo of the Monty Woolley star?  As you may have noticed, I generated a mini-controversy because somebody looked that the HWOF.com entry -- which is wrong -- those photos are photoshopped.  The LATimes Starwalk Project photo is genuine, but if you have a recent photo you could contribute, that would remove all doubt.  Thanks! [[User:DoctorJoeE|DoctorJoeE]] ([[User talk:DoctorJoeE|talk]]) 15:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
12532 +++$+++ JGKlein +++$+++ JGKlein +++$+++ 12530 +++$+++ 12531 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.280268900E09 +++$+++ Hello - yes, I did take a recent photo of the [[Monty Woolley]] star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. I have already contributed it - it's in his Wikipedia entry.  +++$+++ ::Hello - yes, I did take a recent photo of the [[Monty Woolley]] star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. I have already contributed it - it's in his Wikipedia entry. [[User:JGKlein|JGKlein]] ([[User talk:JGKlein#top|talk]]) 15:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
12533 +++$+++ DoctorJoeE +++$+++ JGKlein +++$+++ 12530 +++$+++ 12530 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.280269800E09 +++$+++ Problem solved; thanks very much.  +++$+++ :Problem solved; thanks very much. [[User:DoctorJoeE|DoctorJoeE]] ([[User talk:DoctorJoeE|talk]]) 15:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
12534 +++$+++ DoctorJoeE +++$+++ JGKlein +++$+++ 12530 +++$+++ 12533 +++$+++ 2010-07-29 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.280469600E09 +++$+++ One more photo request, if can spare the time and you feel so inclined -- if you happen to have a wide-angle lens (a fisheye would be ideal), a photo taken at the northeast or northwest corner of Hollywood & Vine, looking north, incorporating both the stars on the Walk and the Capitol Records Building, would be a great addition to the article.  I've already used several of the shots you uploaded - many thanks for your contribution!  +++$+++ ::One more photo request, if can spare the time and you feel so inclined -- if you happen to have a wide-angle lens (a fisheye would be ideal), a photo taken at the northeast or northwest corner of Hollywood & Vine, looking north, incorporating both the stars on the Walk and the Capitol Records Building, would be a great addition to the article.  I've already used several of the shots you uploaded - many thanks for your contribution! [[User:DoctorJoeE|DoctorJoeE]] ([[User talk:DoctorJoeE|talk]]) 23:00, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

536819 +++$+++ Miskin +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-29 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.133287080E09 +++$+++ \"Hellenistic ruler\" is an [[exonym]] which refers to a Greek ruler of the Hellenistic Kingdoms. In the Hellenistic age all cultures and people that were Hellenised were referred to as Greek, never as Hellenistic. Best example of this is the late works of the christian [[Bible]], have a look at the sample text in the article [[Koine Greek]]. I tried to reflect this reality in the article Diadochoi but you kept reverting.  +++$+++ "Hellenistic ruler" is an [[exonym]] which refers to a Greek ruler of the Hellenistic Kingdoms. In the Hellenistic age all cultures and people that were Hellenised were referred to as Greek, never as Hellenistic. Best example of this is the late works of the christian [[Bible]], have a look at the sample text in the article [[Koine Greek]]. I tried to reflect this reality in the article Diadochoi but you kept reverting. [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 09:58, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
536820 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536819 +++$+++ 536819 +++$+++ 2005-11-29 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.133289300E09 +++$+++ Without offence, the point is that I'm not really interested in how in the Greeks called themselves in this context. Historians have always used these conventions (Byzantine, Hellenistic, Middle Ages, etc.) and since they continue to use them, so shall I. While others may be fighting for the truth, I'm only interested in stating what is the academic mainstream on the subjects I touch.  +++$+++ :Without offence, the point is that I'm not really interested in how in the Greeks called themselves in this context. Historians have always used these conventions (Byzantine, Hellenistic, Middle Ages, etc.) and since they continue to use them, so shall I. While others may be fighting for the truth, I'm only interested in stating what is the academic mainstream on the subjects I touch. [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 10:35, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

274676 +++$+++ Bhadani +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-17 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.213742340E09 +++$+++ Just dropped in to say thanks and hello: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Bhadani&diff=219940404&oldid=219922020] -- +++$+++ Just dropped in to say thanks and hello: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bhadani&diff=219940404&oldid=219922020] --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] ([[User_talk:Bhadani|talk]]) 15:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
274677 +++$+++ Bhadani +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274676 +++$+++ 274676 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.213742340E09 +++$+++ I have more chocolates, if you want them for you or for your friends, please tell me immediately as other Wikipedians are keenly watching all the moves! :) -- +++$+++ :I have more chocolates, if you want them for you or for your friends, please tell me immediately as other Wikipedians are keenly watching all the moves! :) --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] ([[User_talk:Bhadani|talk]]) 15:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
274678 +++$+++ Bhadani +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274676 +++$+++ 274677 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.213829100E09 +++$+++ So you all have finished more than 50% of the <s>bears<\/s> bars :) Very good. -- +++$+++ ::So you all have finished more than 50% of the <s>bears</s> bars :) Very good. --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] ([[User_talk:Bhadani|talk]]) 15:45, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

536821 +++$+++ WikiPedant +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536821 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-01 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.133448240E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:WikiPedant|WikiPedant]] 06:44, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
536822 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536821 +++$+++ 536821 +++$+++ 2005-12-01 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.133468100E09 +++$+++ Absolutely perfect. Continue the good work! :-)  +++$+++ :Absolutely perfect. Continue the good work! :-) [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 12:15, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

274679 +++$+++ Retarius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-18 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.213785660E09 +++$+++ Sarah, I'd appreciate an explanation for your response to my efforts in regard to the above article on its talk page. You appear to have simply made a subjective edit without offering any substantiation. If you check my contribs, you will discover that I am a good-faith editor. I don't appreciate being slagged in edit summaries with expressions such as \"shockingly appalling\". Anyone can write garbage of that sort. I can just as easily revert you with the same language.  +++$+++ Sarah, I'd appreciate an explanation for your response to my efforts in regard to the above article on its talk page. You appear to have simply made a subjective edit without offering any substantiation. If you check my contribs, you will discover that I am a good-faith editor. I don't appreciate being slagged in edit summaries with expressions such as "shockingly appalling". Anyone can write garbage of that sort. I can just as easily revert you with the same language. [[User:Retarius|Retarius]] | [[User talk:Retarius|Talk]] 03:41, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
274680 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274679 +++$+++ 274679 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.213786320E09 +++$+++ I didn't \"slag\" you off; I made a comment about the article, which is a completely different thing. The article did not conform to [[WP:NPOV]] or [[WP:V]], amongst other policies and guidelines. I have indeed looked at your contributions after I was alerted to some concerns and I noticed a problem of injecting editorial commentary into articles which is not acceptable on Wikipedia and these articles are going to have to be cleaned up. I would write more about this but I have a list of other jobs I must do right now and so it will have to wait until later. Thanks,  +++$+++ :I didn't "slag" you off; I made a comment about the article, which is a completely different thing. The article did not conform to [[WP:NPOV]] or [[WP:V]], amongst other policies and guidelines. I have indeed looked at your contributions after I was alerted to some concerns and I noticed a problem of injecting editorial commentary into articles which is not acceptable on Wikipedia and these articles are going to have to be cleaned up. I would write more about this but I have a list of other jobs I must do right now and so it will have to wait until later. Thanks, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:52, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
274681 +++$+++ Retarius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274679 +++$+++ 274680 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.213790220E09 +++$+++ Apparently you believe that the civility rules don't apply in edit summaries. I reject your allegation that I insert \"editorial comments\" into articles.  +++$+++ ::Apparently you believe that the civility rules don't apply in edit summaries. I reject your allegation that I insert "editorial comments" into articles. [[User:Retarius|Retarius]] | [[User talk:Retarius|Talk]] 04:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
274682 +++$+++ Retarius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274679 +++$+++ 274681 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.213795140E09 +++$+++ I don't know what the \"related accounts\" are that you are referring to in your last post or what the concerns are or who raised them. Perhaps you could be specific and allow me to address these issues. There's not much point in speaking in incomprehensible vagaries. Further, how is one revert an \"edit war\"? Anyway, since OIC politely specified the objections I'd already decided not to edit any further on that article.   +++$+++ :::I don't know what the "related accounts" are that you are referring to in your last post or what the concerns are or who raised them. Perhaps you could be specific and allow me to address these issues. There's not much point in speaking in incomprehensible vagaries. Further, how is one revert an "edit war"? Anyway, since OIC politely specified the objections I'd already decided not to edit any further on that article.  [[User:Retarius|Retarius]] | [[User talk:Retarius|Talk]] 06:19, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
274683 +++$+++ Retarius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274679 +++$+++ 274682 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.213800600E09 +++$+++ You have taken the trouble to make some allegation, the gist of which I don't get, about \"related accounts\". Please tell me what these \"accounts\" are and what the serious allegations are. I am perfectly willing to work this out reasonably with you if you'll treat me fairly. You don't have to specify the source at this point. Has it occurred to you that this \"private information\" may simply not be true?   +++$+++ ::::You have taken the trouble to make some allegation, the gist of which I don't get, about "related accounts". Please tell me what these "accounts" are and what the serious allegations are. I am perfectly willing to work this out reasonably with you if you'll treat me fairly. You don't have to specify the source at this point. Has it occurred to you that this "private information" may simply not be true?  [[User:Retarius|Retarius]] | [[User talk:Retarius|Talk]] 07:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
274684 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274679 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.213819020E09 +++$+++ Thanks Steve. I think everything is resolved here. Anyway, I'm going to send you an email soonish. :)  +++$+++ ::::::Thanks Steve. I think everything is resolved here. Anyway, I'm going to send you an email soonish. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
274685 +++$+++ Retarius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274679 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-19 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.213888680E09 +++$+++ The other is to do with the episode involving the blocked user and other matters in April 2008. After reviewing the history, I can see why a certain conclusion might be drawn concerning \"sock-puppetting\" and I'd like to clear the air about that if you're willing to hear me.  +++$+++ :::::::The other is to do with the episode involving the blocked user and other matters in April 2008. After reviewing the history, I can see why a certain conclusion might be drawn concerning "sock-puppetting" and I'd like to clear the air about that if you're willing to hear me. [[User:Retarius|Retarius]] | [[User talk:Retarius|Talk]] 08:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
274686 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274679 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-19 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.213891140E09 +++$+++ I believe you made those edits with good intentions but you have to understand on Wikipedia we only report what reliable independent third party sources have already published. A lot of what I've read in your writing would be okay if you found proper sources to reference the material to, but you can't put Wikipedia in the position of making these statements ourselves as the 'primary voice'. As for your comments about wanting to clear the air about the blocked accounts and socking, I'm all ears and would be very interested in what you have to say about those issues.  +++$+++ ::::::::I believe you made those edits with good intentions but you have to understand on Wikipedia we only report what reliable independent third party sources have already published. A lot of what I've read in your writing would be okay if you found proper sources to reference the material to, but you can't put Wikipedia in the position of making these statements ourselves as the 'primary voice'. As for your comments about wanting to clear the air about the blocked accounts and socking, I'm all ears and would be very interested in what you have to say about those issues. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
274687 +++$+++ Retarius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274679 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-19 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.213891980E09 +++$+++ Thankyou for your civil reply. I was very upset yesterday because I usually like to think I'm one of the \"Good Guys\" (of course...\"Ben Linus\" keeps saying that too, doesn't he?) and I was rather stunned to find myself wearing the black shirt of the other team. I don't want to put fuel on any old fires, so I'll email the other stuff.  +++$+++ :::::::::Thankyou for your civil reply. I was very upset yesterday because I usually like to think I'm one of the "Good Guys" (of course..."Ben Linus" keeps saying that too, doesn't he?) and I was rather stunned to find myself wearing the black shirt of the other team. I don't want to put fuel on any old fires, so I'll email the other stuff. [[User:Retarius|Retarius]] | [[User talk:Retarius|Talk]] 09:13, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

570068 +++$+++ Helix84 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570068 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-31 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.162286880E09 +++$+++ BTW, you probably missed my response to [[User_talk:Helix84#SVG-making software?]] in [[#Re: SVG-making software?]]. ~~ +++$+++ BTW, you probably missed my response to [[User_talk:Helix84#SVG-making software?]] in [[#Re: SVG-making software?]]. ~~[[User:helix84|helix84]] 01:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
570069 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570068 +++$+++ 570068 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.168873860E09 +++$+++ Ok, I have read the salt forum post. And yeah, that post has a much better explanation. But I don't like that one either. I usually explain salts in a very different way. And I usually explain salts and IVs at the same time, since I see them as just different variants of the same thing. But it wasn't me who wrote the salt article here on Wikipedia and I must admit I am in no mood to rework the salt article, sorry. -- +++$+++ :Ok, I have read the salt forum post. And yeah, that post has a much better explanation. But I don't like that one either. I usually explain salts in a very different way. And I usually explain salts and IVs at the same time, since I see them as just different variants of the same thing. But it wasn't me who wrote the salt article here on Wikipedia and I must admit I am in no mood to rework the salt article, sorry. --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 07:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

536826 +++$+++ Cigor +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536826 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-13 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.134523860E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Cigor|Cigor]] 17:31, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
536827 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536826 +++$+++ 536826 +++$+++ 2005-12-13 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.134526140E09 +++$+++ Hi Cigor :-) You must understand that my objections do not come from disbelief, on the contrary between the two theories I think your seems the nearest to truth. But you have to understand that these statements may be contested may be others, all the one you mentioned. '''When I mean sourcing I mean mentioning scholar xxxx and historian xxxx so to substain the points against possible future objections.''' Second, context can help: like if you write \"Macedonia was very peaceful after WWII, compared to the inter-wars years\" and here putting a rapid allusion to the VMRO violence, and if you write \"also compared to Croatia and Bosnia\", and adding something like, \"where ustasa violence was active in the first post-war decade\". These are only examples, and I have no doubt you can find something better. If you still have some questions or objections, don't have problems asking. Bye :-)  +++$+++ :Hi Cigor :-) You must understand that my objections do not come from disbelief, on the contrary between the two theories I think your seems the nearest to truth. But you have to understand that these statements may be contested may be others, all the one you mentioned. '''When I mean sourcing I mean mentioning scholar xxxx and historian xxxx so to substain the points against possible future objections.''' Second, context can help: like if you write "Macedonia was very peaceful after WWII, compared to the inter-wars years" and here putting a rapid allusion to the VMRO violence, and if you write "also compared to Croatia and Bosnia", and adding something like, "where ustasa violence was active in the first post-war decade". These are only examples, and I have no doubt you can find something better. If you still have some questions or objections, don't have problems asking. Bye :-) [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 18:09, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
536828 +++$+++ Cigor +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536826 +++$+++ 536827 +++$+++ 2005-12-13 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.134527040E09 +++$+++ Regards,-- +++$+++ ::Regards,--[[User:Cigor|Cigor]] 18:24, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

613759 +++$+++ Yopienso +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613759 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-18 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.247972820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your patience in helping me to understand Wiki better and use and contribute more profitably.   +++$+++ Thanks for your patience in helping me to understand Wiki better and use and contribute more profitably.  [[User:Yopienso|Yopienso]] ([[User talk:Yopienso|talk]]) 20:07, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
613760 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613759 +++$+++ 613759 +++$+++ 2009-07-19 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.248067260E09 +++$+++ Thanks, hope this helps. My experience is that article talk page discussion backed up by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] tends to achieve more than any other way of resolving disputes. . .  +++$+++ :Thanks, hope this helps. My experience is that article talk page discussion backed up by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] tends to achieve more than any other way of resolving disputes. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:21, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

274689 +++$+++ Keeper76 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-20 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.214012460E09 +++$+++ ...but [[User talk:Sarah\/Archive16]] is currently in [[:C:CSD]].  Any ideas?  [[User:Keeper76|<font color=\"#21421E\" face=\"comic sans ms\">Keeper<\/font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color=\"#CC7722\" face=\"Papyrus\">76<\/font>]]  |   +++$+++ ...but [[User talk:Sarah/Archive16]] is currently in [[:C:CSD]].  Any ideas?  [[User:Keeper76|<font color="#21421E" face="comic sans ms">Keeper</font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">76</font>]]  |  [[User:Keeper76#Origins of My Username|<font color="#ff0000"><small>Disclaimer</small></font>]] 18:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
274690 +++$+++ Gnangarra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274689 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.214012820E09 +++$+++ fixed found it [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASarah%2FArchive16&diff=220615788&oldid=220612357] there was a hongon template in there  +++$+++ ::fixed found it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASarah%2FArchive16&diff=220615788&oldid=220612357] there was a hongon template in there [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 18:47, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
274691 +++$+++ Keeper76 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274689 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.214012940E09 +++$+++ Ah thanks, I looked up and down that ridiculously long talkpage for a db or hangon, didn't see it.  Thanks Gnanarra, [[User:Keeper76|<font color=\"#21421E\" face=\"comic sans ms\">Keeper<\/font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color=\"#CC7722\" face=\"Papyrus\">76<\/font>]]  |   +++$+++ :::Ah thanks, I looked up and down that ridiculously long talkpage for a db or hangon, didn't see it.  Thanks Gnanarra, [[User:Keeper76|<font color="#21421E" face="comic sans ms">Keeper</font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">76</font>]]  |  [[User:Keeper76#Origins of My Username|<font color="#ff0000"><small>Disclaimer</small></font>]] 18:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
274692 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274689 +++$+++ 274689 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.214013240E09 +++$+++ (after ec)Oh Keeper, I have no idea! I just no wiki'd the whole page as it's nearly 5 am here and I'm desperate to get some sleep, or rather, I'm desperate for sleep that involves a bed and doesn't involve waking up with my neck twisted and my finger making page after page of \"aaaaaaaaaaaa...\"! So I have 'no wiki'd' the page for now and will try to find the problem in the morning. I just archived a bunch of stuff before, so it's possible that it was something to do with that. My apologies for the inconvenience and many thanks for the heads up. Cheers,  +++$+++ :(after ec)Oh Keeper, I have no idea! I just no wiki'd the whole page as it's nearly 5 am here and I'm desperate to get some sleep, or rather, I'm desperate for sleep that involves a bed and doesn't involve waking up with my neck twisted and my finger making page after page of "aaaaaaaaaaaa..."! So I have 'no wiki'd' the page for now and will try to find the problem in the morning. I just archived a bunch of stuff before, so it's possible that it was something to do with that. My apologies for the inconvenience and many thanks for the heads up. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 18:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
274693 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274689 +++$+++ 274689 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.214013240E09 +++$+++ Oh, one of my knights in shinning armour has rescued me once again. Many thanks, Gnang. :)  +++$+++ :Oh, one of my knights in shinning armour has rescued me once again. Many thanks, Gnang. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 18:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
274694 +++$+++ Keeper76 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274689 +++$+++ 274693 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.214015760E09 +++$+++ Sleep well!  [[User:Keeper76|<font color=\"#21421E\" face=\"comic sans ms\">Keeper<\/font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color=\"#CC7722\" face=\"Papyrus\">76<\/font>]]  |   +++$+++ ::Sleep well!  [[User:Keeper76|<font color="#21421E" face="comic sans ms">Keeper</font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">76</font>]]  |  [[User:Keeper76#Origins of My Username|<font color="#ff0000"><small>Disclaimer</small></font>]] 19:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

87708 +++$+++ Centpacrr +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ 87708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-10 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.265813940E09 +++$+++ That being the case, I have thus restored the longstanding introductory paragraph of the article which was developed by consensus of the group of editors that have been the major contributors to this article over the years and have added to this an edited down version of non POV material from your second paragraph. If you wish to propose making major alterations to the longstanding introduction (or other sections) of this mature article, please first take them the entry's talk page for discussion before making wholesale changes that massively alter both its existing substace and character. Thank you.  +++$+++ That being the case, I have thus restored the longstanding introductory paragraph of the article which was developed by consensus of the group of editors that have been the major contributors to this article over the years and have added to this an edited down version of non POV material from your second paragraph. If you wish to propose making major alterations to the longstanding introduction (or other sections) of this mature article, please first take them the entry's talk page for discussion before making wholesale changes that massively alter both its existing substace and character. Thank you. [[User:Centpacrr|Centpacrr]] ([[User talk:Centpacrr|talk]]) 06:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
87709 +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ 87708 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-24 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.267075740E09 +++$+++ Made another tweak [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Transcontinental_railroad&action=historysubmit&diff=346164630&oldid=345281657 here] to clarify. Plain Jane \"Railroad\" is ambiguous. Be Well || <b> +++$+++ ::* Made another tweak [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transcontinental_railroad&action=historysubmit&diff=346164630&oldid=345281657 here] to clarify. Plain Jane "Railroad" is ambiguous. Be Well || <b>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</b><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 21:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
87710 +++$+++ Centpacrr +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ 87708 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-24 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.267083180E09 +++$+++ I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Transcontinental_railroad&curid=51916&diff=346186604&oldid=346164630 tweaked the intro] to indicate that a transcontinental road can also be over the tracks of a ''single'' carrier as well such as with [[Via Rail]] in Canada.  +++$+++ :::*I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transcontinental_railroad&curid=51916&diff=346186604&oldid=346164630 tweaked the intro] to indicate that a transcontinental road can also be over the tracks of a ''single'' carrier as well such as with [[Via Rail]] in Canada. [[User:Centpacrr|Centpacrr]] ([[User talk:Centpacrr|talk]]) 23:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
87711 +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ 87708 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-24 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.267083360E09 +++$+++ THAT strikes me as obvious... the norm being buried by a wording terseness twas more worrisome. \/\/ <b> +++$+++ :::: THAT strikes me as obvious... the norm being buried by a wording terseness twas more worrisome. // <b>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</b><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 23:36, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
87712 +++$+++ Centpacrr +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ 87708 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-25 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.267088640E09 +++$+++ I deleted the Via Rail ref I made in the intro which was my bad. Also while there may not ''currently'' be any transcontinental railroads that run over trackage owned entirely by a single railroad, I don't know that this has never been the case. As this article refers mostly to the history of such lines lines going back as far as the mid 19th century, however, it seems to me then that the possibility that such a situation likely existed for one or more such roads at some point in time and therefore needs to be accounted for in the definition.   +++$+++ ::::: I deleted the Via Rail ref I made in the intro which was my bad. Also while there may not ''currently'' be any transcontinental railroads that run over trackage owned entirely by a single railroad, I don't know that this has never been the case. As this article refers mostly to the history of such lines lines going back as far as the mid 19th century, however, it seems to me then that the possibility that such a situation likely existed for one or more such roads at some point in time and therefore needs to be accounted for in the definition.  [[User:Centpacrr|Centpacrr]] ([[User talk:Centpacrr#top|talk]]) 01:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

536835 +++$+++ Primetime +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-27 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.135713540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Primetime|Primetime]] 11:59, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
536836 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536835 +++$+++ 536835 +++$+++ 2005-12-27 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.135714560E09 +++$+++ Hi Primetime :-) The point is that if we really want to put a pronunciation aid, I have a feeling we should put it for the original Greek name, not for the Latin one. But I won't insist on this issue, so, if you think it's better your way, there's no problem.  +++$+++ :Hi Primetime :-) The point is that if we really want to put a pronunciation aid, I have a feeling we should put it for the original Greek name, not for the Latin one. But I won't insist on this issue, so, if you think it's better your way, there's no problem. [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 12:16, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
536837 +++$+++ Primetime +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536835 +++$+++ 536836 +++$+++ 2005-12-27 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.135715640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Primetime|Primetime]] 12:34, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

570070 +++$+++ Mike Selinker +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-17 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.163834580E09 +++$+++ That's awesome, thanks.-- +++$+++ That's awesome, thanks.--[[User:Mike Selinker|Mike Selinker]] 23:23, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
570071 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570070 +++$+++ 570070 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.168864260E09 +++$+++ I checked my own code again an reran it. It gave the same result as before. I also tried the web based RC4 demo that the article links to and it also gave the same result. Of course, both those implementations might have the same bug. (Different programmers tend to make the same misstakes.) But I seem to remember that several other crypto geeks in a crypto chat where I hang out tested those test vectors in their implementations. So I think that the test vectors are right. You have to double check with other implementations than your own and see what happens. -- +++$+++ :I checked my own code again an reran it. It gave the same result as before. I also tried the web based RC4 demo that the article links to and it also gave the same result. Of course, both those implementations might have the same bug. (Different programmers tend to make the same misstakes.) But I seem to remember that several other crypto geeks in a crypto chat where I hang out tested those test vectors in their implementations. So I think that the test vectors are right. You have to double check with other implementations than your own and see what happens. --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 04:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
570072 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.168998360E09 +++$+++ Hehe, the human factor is always a big factor in cryptography. Thanks for coming back and reporting so that we now know that the test vectors seem to be correct. -- +++$+++ :::Hehe, the human factor is always a big factor in cryptography. Thanks for coming back and reporting so that we now know that the test vectors seem to be correct. --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 17:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

12550 +++$+++ Esteban.barahona +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-25 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.219710840E09 +++$+++ As it is in the  [[Template_talk:Buddhism_topics|discussion]], this template should be synthetised. I wasn't aware that someone was undoing every and each change I made. I don't intend to start a \"edition war\", so I will just ask, why keep so many links that are accesible from the main articles? I will delete just [[List of Buddhists]] for now, because it's 3 times on the same index (have you seen an index with 3 links to the same page?!)-- +++$+++ As it is in the  [[Template_talk:Buddhism_topics|discussion]], this template should be synthetised. I wasn't aware that someone was undoing every and each change I made. I don't intend to start a "edition war", so I will just ask, why keep so many links that are accesible from the main articles? I will delete just [[List of Buddhists]] for now, because it's 3 times on the same index (have you seen an index with 3 links to the same page?!)--[[User:Esteban.barahona|Esteban.barahona]] ([[User talk:Esteban.barahona|talk]]) 17:34, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
12551 +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12550 +++$+++ 12550 +++$+++ 2008-08-25 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.219711200E09 +++$+++ Hi, I sincerely apologize if I have annoyed you by undoing the changes you made. I just thought you deleted some important things. Best wishes.  +++$+++ : Hi, I sincerely apologize if I have annoyed you by undoing the changes you made. I just thought you deleted some important things. Best wishes. [[User:Eu.stefan|eu.stefan]] ([[User talk:Eu.stefan#top|talk]]) 17:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

274695 +++$+++ Jh12 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-21 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.214034360E09 +++$+++ I didn't want to bring this up. We're all busy people and have much better things to do. However, I'm getting to the point where trying to improve [[Jakarta International School]] is becoming slightly hostile and distasteful thanks to [[User:Merbabu]]. Expectations that every word must be sourced is an expectation of a GA-class article, not a start.  Regardless, I've accepted that criterion.  However, Merbabu's refusal to expend any effort to actually improve the article and focus on deleting the work of others is disturbing.  This is in addition to edit comments which have bordered on being uncivil. The fact is, the curriculum of [[Jakarta International School]] does have a strong international focus.  The United States Department of State says so. [http:\/\/www.state.gov\/m\/a\/os\/1352.htm] Meeting the needs and interests of expatriate students is exactly why the school was founded.  We can't get around these aspects of the school, nor can we get around the fact that the United States Department of State considers the school \"one of the best college preparatory schools overseas.\" [http:\/\/jakarta.usembassy.gov\/download\/school_info%20.doc] I haven't even added that last line.  But these are important, legitimate facts promoted by third-party sources.  If I'm mis-reading this situation, please let me know. But frankly, my patience is wearing thin on a subject outside my expertise or interest. Best, -- +++$+++ I didn't want to bring this up. We're all busy people and have much better things to do. However, I'm getting to the point where trying to improve [[Jakarta International School]] is becoming slightly hostile and distasteful thanks to [[User:Merbabu]]. Expectations that every word must be sourced is an expectation of a GA-class article, not a start.  Regardless, I've accepted that criterion.  However, Merbabu's refusal to expend any effort to actually improve the article and focus on deleting the work of others is disturbing.  This is in addition to edit comments which have bordered on being uncivil. The fact is, the curriculum of [[Jakarta International School]] does have a strong international focus.  The United States Department of State says so. [http://www.state.gov/m/a/os/1352.htm] Meeting the needs and interests of expatriate students is exactly why the school was founded.  We can't get around these aspects of the school, nor can we get around the fact that the United States Department of State considers the school "one of the best college preparatory schools overseas." [http://jakarta.usembassy.gov/download/school_info%20.doc] I haven't even added that last line.  But these are important, legitimate facts promoted by third-party sources.  If I'm mis-reading this situation, please let me know. But frankly, my patience is wearing thin on a subject outside my expertise or interest. Best, --[[User:Jh12|Jh12]] ([[User talk:Jh12|talk]]) 00:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
274696 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274695 +++$+++ 274695 +++$+++ 2008-06-21 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.214035620E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks for letting me know. I will go back and check out what's been going on as soon as I get time, but I'm really snowed under right now so it may not be today. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Okay, thanks for letting me know. I will go back and check out what's been going on as soon as I get time, but I'm really snowed under right now so it may not be today. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
274697 +++$+++ Jh12 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274695 +++$+++ 274696 +++$+++ 2008-06-21 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.214041860E09 +++$+++ Many thanks and please take your time. I might be jumping the gun, but I'd appreciate an outside perspective.  I just feel like every word is under more scrutiny than any school article on Wikipedia.-- +++$+++ ::Many thanks and please take your time. I might be jumping the gun, but I'd appreciate an outside perspective.  I just feel like every word is under more scrutiny than any school article on Wikipedia.--[[User:Jh12|Jh12]] ([[User talk:Jh12|talk]]) 02:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
274698 +++$+++ Jh12 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274695 +++$+++ 274697 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.214292720E09 +++$+++ On second thought, I think I'll just forget about it; this isn't a big deal and not worth worrying about. I'd rather work on something that isn't under Merbabu's microscope. Best wishes, -- +++$+++ :::On second thought, I think I'll just forget about it; this isn't a big deal and not worth worrying about. I'd rather work on something that isn't under Merbabu's microscope. Best wishes, --[[User:Jh12|Jh12]] ([[User talk:Jh12|talk]]) 00:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

536840 +++$+++ Miskin +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536840 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-29 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.135905660E09 +++$+++ I'm removing the .mk links for the same reason that I'm not using \"Greek\" sources to edit this article. I'm also removing the term \"Ottoman\" because it was a silly compromise attempt of another editor, and has no remote reflection of reality. Have a look at my recent reverts in [[Macedonian Orthodox Church]]. Please support me to keep such chauvinist POVs out of wikipedia, or oppose me by citing sources that prove me wrong, but don't revert me with a plain edit summary because that wastes both of our time.  +++$+++ I'm removing the .mk links for the same reason that I'm not using "Greek" sources to edit this article. I'm also removing the term "Ottoman" because it was a silly compromise attempt of another editor, and has no remote reflection of reality. Have a look at my recent reverts in [[Macedonian Orthodox Church]]. Please support me to keep such chauvinist POVs out of wikipedia, or oppose me by citing sources that prove me wrong, but don't revert me with a plain edit summary because that wastes both of our time. [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 17:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
536841 +++$+++ Macrakis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536840 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-12-30 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.136015880E09 +++$+++ Hello, Aldux, I just noticed this discussion here.  I think it would be better to hold it on the Talk page so that all interested editors can contribute.  I am not sure why Miskin is opposed to using the word \"Ottoman\" in this article, as the thing they are most famous for -- the early films -- were made while Monastir was still Ottoman.  They apparently stayed on in Yugoslav Bitola until the 20's at least, and at some point apparently left for Greece.  It would be good to have more information about all that of course. -- +++$+++ ::Hello, Aldux, I just noticed this discussion here.  I think it would be better to hold it on the Talk page so that all interested editors can contribute.  I am not sure why Miskin is opposed to using the word "Ottoman" in this article, as the thing they are most famous for -- the early films -- were made while Monastir was still Ottoman.  They apparently stayed on in Yugoslav Bitola until the 20's at least, and at some point apparently left for Greece.  It would be good to have more information about all that of course. --[[User:Macrakis|Macrakis]] 23:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
536842 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536840 +++$+++ 536840 +++$+++ 2005-12-29 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.135910940E09 +++$+++ And as for [[Macedonian Orthodox Church]], please don't ask me. When I start controlling an article, I can't help keep monitoring it, and confronting endlessly again a user like Macedonia in still another article would be too hard for me. So sorry :-(  +++$+++ :And as for [[Macedonian Orthodox Church]], please don't ask me. When I start controlling an article, I can't help keep monitoring it, and confronting endlessly again a user like Macedonia in still another article would be too hard for me. So sorry :-( [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 18:49, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
536843 +++$+++ Miskin +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536840 +++$+++ 536842 +++$+++ 2005-12-30 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.135938480E09 +++$+++ Nevermind what I said before, I hadn't checked the diffs on your edits. Now it's fine the way it is. And don't worry about Jonathunder, I think he just follows me around.  +++$+++ ::Nevermind what I said before, I hadn't checked the diffs on your edits. Now it's fine the way it is. And don't worry about Jonathunder, I think he just follows me around. [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 02:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
536844 +++$+++ Miskin +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536840 +++$+++ 536843 +++$+++ 2005-12-30 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.135997760E09 +++$+++ Sorry about the revertions in St Cyril, I didn't notice you had made changes. As I have sourced in the discussion, Culumbia describes the two brother as \"Greek missionaries\". Normally I wouldn't have wanted to put that in the article, but I'm annoyed by the attitude of pan-Slavists editors. They won't even admit the fact that Byzantine Greek was his native language.  +++$+++ :::Sorry about the revertions in St Cyril, I didn't notice you had made changes. As I have sourced in the discussion, Culumbia describes the two brother as "Greek missionaries". Normally I wouldn't have wanted to put that in the article, but I'm annoyed by the attitude of pan-Slavists editors. They won't even admit the fact that Byzantine Greek was his native language. [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 18:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
536845 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536840 +++$+++ 536842 +++$+++ 2005-12-30 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.136003100E09 +++$+++ No problem Miskin :-) As for the ethnicity of the two, I've just given a look to my Italian encyclopedia which also describes the two saints as \"fratelli Greci\", meaning in English \"Greek brothers\".  +++$+++ ::No problem Miskin :-) As for the ethnicity of the two, I've just given a look to my Italian encyclopedia which also describes the two saints as "fratelli Greci", meaning in English "Greek brothers". [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 20:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
536846 +++$+++ Miskin +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536840 +++$+++ 536845 +++$+++ 2005-12-30 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.136008020E09 +++$+++ So do virtually all Latin and Italian references of the Roman Catholic Church. As for the Eastern Orthodox ones, there's not even any need to search. Regards.  +++$+++ :::So do virtually all Latin and Italian references of the Roman Catholic Church. As for the Eastern Orthodox ones, there's not even any need to search. Regards. [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 21:47, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

274699 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-28 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.214646840E09 +++$+++ Could you please explain? thanks. -- +++$+++ Could you please explain? thanks. --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 02:54, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
274700 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274699 +++$+++ 274699 +++$+++ 2008-06-28 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.214647680E09 +++$+++ Hang on. That's a mistake (obviously). I have no idea how that happened...I haven't deleted anything for days. All I did with that article was remove that slab of plagiarised text and I really don't know how that happened, as you have to go through two screens to delete something so it's not like it's easy to do accidentally. I'm restoring it right now. I'm very, very sorry about that, Merbabu.   +++$+++ :Hang on. That's a mistake (obviously). I have no idea how that happened...I haven't deleted anything for days. All I did with that article was remove that slab of plagiarised text and I really don't know how that happened, as you have to go through two screens to delete something so it's not like it's easy to do accidentally. I'm restoring it right now. I'm very, very sorry about that, Merbabu.  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:08, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

12557 +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12557 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-27 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.248748560E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the award, I am truly honored!  +++$+++ Thank you for the award, I am truly honored! [[User:Eu.stefan|eu.stefan]] ([[User talk:Eu.stefan#top|talk]]) 19:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
12558 +++$+++ The Transhumanist +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12557 +++$+++ 12557 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.248763740E09 +++$+++ ''''' +++$+++ : '''''[[User talk:The Transhumanist|<font color="#880088">Th</font><font color="#0000FF">e Tr</font><font color="#449900">ans</font><font color="#DD9922">hu</font><font color="#DD4400">man</font><font color="#BB0000">ist</font> &nbsp;&nbsp;]]''''' 23:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
12559 +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12557 +++$+++ 12558 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.248813240E09 +++$+++ Thank you! It was a pleasure to do it. However, I don't think I am competent enough to edit or work on other subjects. Thank you also for wikifying and trying to improve Outline of Buddhism. The only thing is, I would put the \"Branches of Buddhism\" section further down and leave the Buddha and Doctrine sections first.  +++$+++ :: Thank you! It was a pleasure to do it. However, I don't think I am competent enough to edit or work on other subjects. Thank you also for wikifying and trying to improve Outline of Buddhism. The only thing is, I would put the "Branches of Buddhism" section further down and leave the Buddha and Doctrine sections first. [[User:Eu.stefan|eu.stefan]] ([[User talk:Eu.stefan#top|talk]]) 13:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
12560 +++$+++ The Transhumanist +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12557 +++$+++ 12559 +++$+++ 2009-09-18 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.253330760E09 +++$+++ ''''' +++$+++ ::: '''''[[User talk:The Transhumanist|<font color="#880088">Th</font><font color="#0000FF">e Tr</font><font color="#449900">ans</font><font color="#DD9922">hu</font><font color="#DD4400">man</font><font color="#BB0000">ist</font> &nbsp;&nbsp;]]''''' 20:26, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

274702 +++$+++ Mayalld +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-04 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.215200160E09 +++$+++ ALL community bans exist on exactly the same basis, and would cease to exist as community bans if an admin was prepared to unblock at some future date.  +++$+++ ALL community bans exist on exactly the same basis, and would cease to exist as community bans if an admin was prepared to unblock at some future date. [[User:Mayalld|Mayalld]] ([[User talk:Mayalld|talk]]) 12:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
274703 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274702 +++$+++ 274702 +++$+++ 2008-07-04 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.215200940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your note, Mayalld. To clarify, I don't think a discussion should be closed with a declaration that a person is community banned when there are admins vocally opposed to the ban and have indicated a willingness to unblock under certain circumstances. Personally, I would rather say she is banned as that was my own position in that discussion, but I don't believe it is right to declare a person banned and add them to the list of \"banned users\" when there is only a demonstrable consensus to block, not ban.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your note, Mayalld. To clarify, I don't think a discussion should be closed with a declaration that a person is community banned when there are admins vocally opposed to the ban and have indicated a willingness to unblock under certain circumstances. Personally, I would rather say she is banned as that was my own position in that discussion, but I don't believe it is right to declare a person banned and add them to the list of "banned users" when there is only a demonstrable consensus to block, not ban. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
274704 +++$+++ Mayalld +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274702 +++$+++ 274703 +++$+++ 2008-07-04 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.215201480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply. I still think we are trying to invent a whole new terminology, but at the end of the day, if Carol isn't doing more harm today, then it isn't worth worrying about!  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the reply. I still think we are trying to invent a whole new terminology, but at the end of the day, if Carol isn't doing more harm today, then it isn't worth worrying about! [[User:Mayalld|Mayalld]] ([[User talk:Mayalld|talk]]) 12:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
274705 +++$+++ Gnangarra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274702 +++$+++ 274704 +++$+++ 2008-07-04 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.215203820E09 +++$+++ I'd also point out that decision to \"ban\" was taken over a short period of time, where as XfD takes 5 days min, RfA\/RfB take 7 day. ARBCOM decision take considerably longer. While it may have been appropriate to block Carol, given her contributions to other WMF projects and pass contributions I would consider unblocking her.  +++$+++ :::I'd also point out that decision to "ban" was taken over a short period of time, where as XfD takes 5 days min, RfA/RfB take 7 day. ARBCOM decision take considerably longer. While it may have been appropriate to block Carol, given her contributions to other WMF projects and pass contributions I would consider unblocking her. [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 13:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
274706 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274702 +++$+++ 274705 +++$+++ 2008-07-04 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.215217260E09 +++$+++ I don't think there was a decision to ban; there was a strong consensus to block, with only one person opposing such a block. But several people who endorsed the block expressed reservations about a ban, thus I do not consider there was any decision to ban. That last ANI discussion lasted about 50 hours which I agree is fairly quick when compared to other types of discussions that have a fixed duration, but it was closed early out of consideration for Carol -- who was angry and upset and digging a deeper whole by continuing to make attacks from her talk page -- and it really isn't that unusual for community sanction discussions to close after a couple of days, especially when it is a follow on discussion as was the case here. The full discussion from Durova's original ban proposal through to the final indefinite block spanned at least three different ANI discussions, an RfC and lasted for about 16 days, so I think the discussion has actually been quite extensive. As for unblocking her, I think it would be a big mistake to unblock her without a consensus when the consensus to block her is so strong and it would probably result in a ticket straight to Arb Com, especially in this current climate. I don't think Carol is banned, but she is under a community-based sanction and if she is to be unblocked then it should be after a new community discussion. So I do hope that no one unilaterally overturns it without a new consensus and I don't think there will be a consensus to unblock until she makes a few undertakings.  +++$+++ ::::I don't think there was a decision to ban; there was a strong consensus to block, with only one person opposing such a block. But several people who endorsed the block expressed reservations about a ban, thus I do not consider there was any decision to ban. That last ANI discussion lasted about 50 hours which I agree is fairly quick when compared to other types of discussions that have a fixed duration, but it was closed early out of consideration for Carol -- who was angry and upset and digging a deeper whole by continuing to make attacks from her talk page -- and it really isn't that unusual for community sanction discussions to close after a couple of days, especially when it is a follow on discussion as was the case here. The full discussion from Durova's original ban proposal through to the final indefinite block spanned at least three different ANI discussions, an RfC and lasted for about 16 days, so I think the discussion has actually been quite extensive. As for unblocking her, I think it would be a big mistake to unblock her without a consensus when the consensus to block her is so strong and it would probably result in a ticket straight to Arb Com, especially in this current climate. I don't think Carol is banned, but she is under a community-based sanction and if she is to be unblocked then it should be after a new community discussion. So I do hope that no one unilaterally overturns it without a new consensus and I don't think there will be a consensus to unblock until she makes a few undertakings. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 17:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
274707 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274702 +++$+++ 274704 +++$+++ 2008-07-04 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.215217260E09 +++$+++ Mayalld, I find that our 'Wikipedia language' is the biggest problem that new people seem to have trouble following - not just all our acronyms but our novel use of words like notable, consensus, editor etc. Anyway, I don't know if you know or not, but when people are banned, they get added here: [[Wikipedia:List_of_banned_users]] and that is the list that we use to find out if someone is banned or not and I have seen discussions run off the rails and become very confused when that list is not accurate. That's why I changed the closure. As much as I would like to say that Carol is banned, I really don't think that was the consensus. You're absolutely correct that the immediate effect is the same and the important thing is that the disruption is contained. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Mayalld, I find that our 'Wikipedia language' is the biggest problem that new people seem to have trouble following - not just all our acronyms but our novel use of words like notable, consensus, editor etc. Anyway, I don't know if you know or not, but when people are banned, they get added here: [[Wikipedia:List_of_banned_users]] and that is the list that we use to find out if someone is banned or not and I have seen discussions run off the rails and become very confused when that list is not accurate. That's why I changed the closure. As much as I would like to say that Carol is banned, I really don't think that was the consensus. You're absolutely correct that the immediate effect is the same and the important thing is that the disruption is contained. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 17:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

467957 +++$+++ Woody +++$+++ Ahoerstemeier +++$+++ 467957 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-09 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.213053240E09 +++$+++ As the section header suggests, what is the procedure for requesting an SUL usurp on the Thai wikipedia? I am currently trying to go through the accounts with the username Woody for SUL purposes. The [[:th:User:Woody]] has no edits since registration at \"07:02, 11 April 2007.\" Is it possible to get it usurped? Thanks and regards.  +++$+++ As the section header suggests, what is the procedure for requesting an SUL usurp on the Thai wikipedia? I am currently trying to go through the accounts with the username Woody for SUL purposes. The [[:th:User:Woody]] has no edits since registration at "07:02, 11 April 2007." Is it possible to get it usurped? Thanks and regards. [[User:Woody|Woody]] ([[User talk:Woody|talk]]) 16:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
467958 +++$+++ Woody +++$+++ Ahoerstemeier +++$+++ 467957 +++$+++ 467957 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.214353440E09 +++$+++ Any comments on this? Thanks, regards.  +++$+++ :Any comments on this? Thanks, regards. [[User:Woody|Woody]] ([[User talk:Woody|talk]]) 17:24, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
467959 +++$+++ Ahoerstemeier +++$+++ Ahoerstemeier +++$+++ 467957 +++$+++ 467958 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.214367000E09 +++$+++ Oh sorry, this one slipped through. I don't know if and what rules the Thai wikipedia has made for these cases, as I don't speak much of the language yet. You best ask at the [[:th:WP:Embassy|Embassy]], there you'll find someone speaking English and having more knowledge on the local rules to assist you.  +++$+++ ::Oh sorry, this one slipped through. I don't know if and what rules the Thai wikipedia has made for these cases, as I don't speak much of the language yet. You best ask at the [[:th:WP:Embassy|Embassy]], there you'll find someone speaking English and having more knowledge on the local rules to assist you. [[User:Ahoerstemeier|andy]] ([[User talk:Ahoerstemeier#top|talk]]) 21:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
467960 +++$+++ Woody +++$+++ Ahoerstemeier +++$+++ 467957 +++$+++ 467959 +++$+++ 2008-06-25 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.214445720E09 +++$+++ Perfect, thanks.  +++$+++ :::Perfect, thanks. [[User:Woody|Woody]] ([[User talk:Woody|talk]]) 19:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

12561 +++$+++ L-Bit +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-19 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.250672580E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:L-Bit|L-Bit]] ([[User talk:L-Bit|talk]]) 02:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
12562 +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12561 +++$+++ 12561 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.250712960E09 +++$+++ Hi L-Bit. I'm sorry but I'm afraid I know nothing about that village. But I can refer you to someone who probably knows - [[User:TodorBozhinov]]. Best wishes.  +++$+++ : Hi L-Bit. I'm sorry but I'm afraid I know nothing about that village. But I can refer you to someone who probably knows - [[User:TodorBozhinov]]. Best wishes. [[User:Eu.stefan|eu.stefan]] ([[User talk:Eu.stefan#top|talk]]) 13:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

613763 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-16 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.247784960E09 +++$+++ One thing that I have reservations about in the article, that I choose to disregard in the GA review, is the use of what seems like primary sources to compile the article. And the use of primarily one website, although the information there is reliable. Should you not be using more third-party sources, to avoid charges of OR? It would help to add more third-party sources directly as references. What do you you think on this issue. Am I off base? Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ One thing that I have reservations about in the article, that I choose to disregard in the GA review, is the use of what seems like primary sources to compile the article. And the use of primarily one website, although the information there is reliable. Should you not be using more third-party sources, to avoid charges of OR? It would help to add more third-party sources directly as references. What do you you think on this issue. Am I off base? Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 15:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
613764 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613763 +++$+++ 613763 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.247788020E09 +++$+++ It's a fair point, the article was initially based on van Wyhe's book, and biographies by Browne and Desmond & Moore. These make use of quotations, and I've tended to follow them up and cite to the original documents rather than also citing the secondary source: more secondary citations could be added to support the primary source citations. The two websites used most are [[Darwin Online]], which provides Freeman's bibliography as a secondary source, and the [[Darwin Correspondence Project]] which in some instances provides a secondary source in the form of notes on the letters. To the extent that I've used [[WP:PSTS|primary source to make descriptive claims]] it's acceptable, if it's contested then I'll have to go over it and agree where to draw the line. Something else to tackle, think it's a priority? . .  +++$+++ :It's a fair point, the article was initially based on van Wyhe's book, and biographies by Browne and Desmond & Moore. These make use of quotations, and I've tended to follow them up and cite to the original documents rather than also citing the secondary source: more secondary citations could be added to support the primary source citations. The two websites used most are [[Darwin Online]], which provides Freeman's bibliography as a secondary source, and the [[Darwin Correspondence Project]] which in some instances provides a secondary source in the form of notes on the letters. To the extent that I've used [[WP:PSTS|primary source to make descriptive claims]] it's acceptable, if it's contested then I'll have to go over it and agree where to draw the line. Something else to tackle, think it's a priority? . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 16:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
613765 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613763 +++$+++ 613764 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.247791080E09 +++$+++ My uncertainty stems from  reading through [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal\/Cases\/2009-07-07\/Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]] and [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Military career of L. Ron Hubbard\/archive1]], seeing the complexity of how [[WP:OR]] is viewed  when sources are original. Or even otherwise, such as the quote from [[Scientific American]] (although I think I see the issue there and the problems with that whole article&mdash;not the same).  &mdash; +++$+++ ::My uncertainty stems from  reading through [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-07-07/Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]] and [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Military career of L. Ron Hubbard/archive1]], seeing the complexity of how [[WP:OR]] is viewed  when sources are original. Or even otherwise, such as the quote from [[Scientific American]] (although I think I see the issue there and the problems with that whole article&mdash;not the same).  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 17:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
613766 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613763 +++$+++ 613765 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.247791740E09 +++$+++ A reasonable point, though in that instance a primary source is being partially cited to contradict or discredit a secondary source: it's informative to cite online versions of sources used by books, provided they're to support the interpretation or analysis given in the secondary source. One thought, some of the Darwin Correspondence Project pages such as [http:\/\/www.darwinproject.ac.uk\/content\/view\/26\/38\/ The correspondence of Charles Darwin, volume 8: 1860] are actually the introductions to the published volumes, and are secondary sources commenting on the context of the letters. Anyway, can do a fair bit to add further inline references to the main secondary sources as needed \u2013 think I should push ahead with that? . .  +++$+++ :::A reasonable point, though in that instance a primary source is being partially cited to contradict or discredit a secondary source: it's informative to cite online versions of sources used by books, provided they're to support the interpretation or analysis given in the secondary source. One thought, some of the Darwin Correspondence Project pages such as [http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/content/view/26/38/ The correspondence of Charles Darwin, volume 8: 1860] are actually the introductions to the published volumes, and are secondary sources commenting on the context of the letters. Anyway, can do a fair bit to add further inline references to the main secondary sources as needed – think I should push ahead with that? . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
613767 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613763 +++$+++ 613766 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.247801340E09 +++$+++ Well, I may register a support, which I was going to do anyway, and see what objections arise. If necessary, then you could add. I don't usually support an article I have copy edited right out of the gate, as of course I am biased in favor. But this nomination seems stalled for one of those unfathomable reasons.  &mdash; +++$+++ ::::Well, I may register a support, which I was going to do anyway, and see what objections arise. If necessary, then you could add. I don't usually support an article I have copy edited right out of the gate, as of course I am biased in favor. But this nomination seems stalled for one of those unfathomable reasons.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
613768 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613763 +++$+++ 613767 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.247807160E09 +++$+++ Thanks, it'll be good to get the ball rolling. To try to stir things up a bit I've now mentioned it at [[WT:WikiProject History of Science]], [[WT:WikiProject Biology]], and have given Philcha a heads-up, not sure how quickly that'll get something happening. . .  +++$+++ :::::Thanks, it'll be good to get the ball rolling. To try to stir things up a bit I've now mentioned it at [[WT:WikiProject History of Science]], [[WT:WikiProject Biology]], and have given Philcha a heads-up, not sure how quickly that'll get something happening. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

12564 +++$+++ Explicit +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-20 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.256039880E09 +++$+++ An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:2008-05-23-550.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion\/2009 October 20#File:2008-05-23-550.jpg|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> \u2014  +++$+++ An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:2008-05-23-550.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 October 20#File:2008-05-23-550.jpg|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> — [[User:Explicit|<font color="8B008B">'''ξ'''</font>]][[User talk:Explicit|<font color="000000"><sup>xplicit</sup></font>]] 04:58, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
12565 +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12564 +++$+++ 12564 +++$+++ 2009-10-20 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.256046960E09 +++$+++ Yes please, delete it! I want to delete some other files that I have uploaded as well; can you tell me how?  +++$+++ : Yes please, delete it! I want to delete some other files that I have uploaded as well; can you tell me how? [[User:Eu.stefan|eu.stefan]] ([[User talk:Eu.stefan#top|talk]]) 06:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

274709 +++$+++ John Smith's +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274709 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-06 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.215371580E09 +++$+++ As I have said on the ANI thread, if it is the case that you would prefer me not to comment further then it would be helpful if you agree with me that we have both put our views across on whether I should or should not have commented in the first place et al, and that nothing more needs to be said on the matter. I hope that's ok with you.  +++$+++ As I have said on the ANI thread, if it is the case that you would prefer me not to comment further then it would be helpful if you agree with me that we have both put our views across on whether I should or should not have commented in the first place et al, and that nothing more needs to be said on the matter. I hope that's ok with you. [[User:John Smith&#39;s|John Smith&#39;s]] ([[User talk:John Smith&#39;s|talk]]) 12:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
274710 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274709 +++$+++ 274709 +++$+++ 2008-07-06 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.215372420E09 +++$+++ John, I don't have a problem with you commenting in the first instance because you've had interaction with him and have a right to your opinion regarding the ban. What I'm objecting to is your heavy input to that thread and your adding him to the banned user list. There's no urgency for that list to be updated and it could well have waited until someone uninvolved did it. I think this ban has been on the cards for a long time and I'm kind of surprised it has taken this long to come to pass so I'm certainly not trying to defend him and I know from experience exactly what he's like. I just don't like seeing community ban discussions develop a sense of politics and that's what this one started looking like. Sure, if it helps I agree that we've both expressed our opinions and nothing else needs to be said.  +++$+++ :John, I don't have a problem with you commenting in the first instance because you've had interaction with him and have a right to your opinion regarding the ban. What I'm objecting to is your heavy input to that thread and your adding him to the banned user list. There's no urgency for that list to be updated and it could well have waited until someone uninvolved did it. I think this ban has been on the cards for a long time and I'm kind of surprised it has taken this long to come to pass so I'm certainly not trying to defend him and I know from experience exactly what he's like. I just don't like seeing community ban discussions develop a sense of politics and that's what this one started looking like. Sure, if it helps I agree that we've both expressed our opinions and nothing else needs to be said. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
274711 +++$+++ John Smith's +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274709 +++$+++ 274710 +++$+++ 2008-07-06 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.215374520E09 +++$+++ If you would like to cut or modify any of the comments we've made on the thread in that little chain let me know. It doesn't look too bad and nothing was said that one would regret, but I think we got the wrong impression about each other's views. I don't mind either way.  +++$+++ ::If you would like to cut or modify any of the comments we've made on the thread in that little chain let me know. It doesn't look too bad and nothing was said that one would regret, but I think we got the wrong impression about each other's views. I don't mind either way. [[User:John Smith&#39;s|John Smith&#39;s]] ([[User talk:John Smith&#39;s|talk]]) 13:02, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
274712 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274709 +++$+++ 274711 +++$+++ 2008-07-07 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.215471120E09 +++$+++ Thank you John. I don't think there is anything that needs to be removed from the thread and I'm happy to let it be archived as is. Normally I would agree that it is perfectly okay to revert a 'bad edit' and generally I wouldn't have any problem with you restoring someone's name to the banned user list if a community ban was passed and someone removed them for no valid reason. It was only in this instance that I had concerns about it because I consider you and Giovanni have been combatants and your involvement with 'leading' (sorry, I know you don't think of it as leading but I can't think of a better word to use) the discussion, contacting users and asking them to clarify their support comments, restoring his name and so on just didn't seem right to me. But anyway, I don't have any on-going issues with you about it or anything else and I'm quite happy to leave things as they are. Thank you for contacting me, though. I appreciate your desire to resolve things face-to-face as it were. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Thank you John. I don't think there is anything that needs to be removed from the thread and I'm happy to let it be archived as is. Normally I would agree that it is perfectly okay to revert a 'bad edit' and generally I wouldn't have any problem with you restoring someone's name to the banned user list if a community ban was passed and someone removed them for no valid reason. It was only in this instance that I had concerns about it because I consider you and Giovanni have been combatants and your involvement with 'leading' (sorry, I know you don't think of it as leading but I can't think of a better word to use) the discussion, contacting users and asking them to clarify their support comments, restoring his name and so on just didn't seem right to me. But anyway, I don't have any on-going issues with you about it or anything else and I'm quite happy to leave things as they are. Thank you for contacting me, though. I appreciate your desire to resolve things face-to-face as it were. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 15:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

570073 +++$+++ Messedrocker +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570073 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-28 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.177764840E09 +++$+++ Hello! In the second run, the articles that are being added are doing so because they belong to a specific category related to computing. I added a clause in AWB to ignore pages with the cryptography template, but I don't know if it will work or not. Let me know if more cryptography pages are tagged. <span style=\"font-size:95%\">&mdash;[[User talk:Messedrocker|Signed]], your friendly neighborhood ''' +++$+++ Hello! In the second run, the articles that are being added are doing so because they belong to a specific category related to computing. I added a clause in AWB to ignore pages with the cryptography template, but I don't know if it will work or not. Let me know if more cryptography pages are tagged. <span style="font-size:95%">&mdash;[[User talk:Messedrocker|Signed]], your friendly neighborhood '''[[User:Messedrocker|MessedRocker]]'''.</span> 05:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
570074 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570073 +++$+++ 570073 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.177765500E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 06:05, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
570075 +++$+++ Messedrocker +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570073 +++$+++ 570074 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 06:14:00 +++$+++ 1.177766040E09 +++$+++ My bot is authorized to run by itself, so no, it is not against policy. Apparently my quick modification to exclude talk pages mentioning the cryptography project hasn't been working (according to you) so I will take the time to manually strip such pages from the worklist. Hold on. <span style=\"font-size:95%\">&mdash;[[User talk:Messedrocker|Signed]], your friendly neighborhood ''' +++$+++ :: My bot is authorized to run by itself, so no, it is not against policy. Apparently my quick modification to exclude talk pages mentioning the cryptography project hasn't been working (according to you) so I will take the time to manually strip such pages from the worklist. Hold on. <span style="font-size:95%">&mdash;[[User talk:Messedrocker|Signed]], your friendly neighborhood '''[[User:Messedrocker|MessedRocker]]'''.</span> 06:14, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
570076 +++$+++ Messedrocker +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570073 +++$+++ 570075 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.177766640E09 +++$+++ It is, and I'm running some list intersections to see how I can fix this problem. <span style=\"font-size:95%\">&mdash;[[User talk:Messedrocker|Signed]], your friendly neighborhood ''' +++$+++ ::: It is, and I'm running some list intersections to see how I can fix this problem. <span style="font-size:95%">&mdash;[[User talk:Messedrocker|Signed]], your friendly neighborhood '''[[User:Messedrocker|MessedRocker]]'''.</span> 06:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
570077 +++$+++ Messedrocker +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570073 +++$+++ 570076 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.177767300E09 +++$+++ The bot should now not tag cryptography-related articles (though a few may slip through the cracks, I don't know), and in fact I have a list of pages lined up to have the Wikiproject Computing tag removed rom them. <span style=\"font-size:95%\">&mdash;[[User talk:Messedrocker|Signed]], your friendly neighborhood ''' +++$+++ :::: The bot should now not tag cryptography-related articles (though a few may slip through the cracks, I don't know), and in fact I have a list of pages lined up to have the Wikiproject Computing tag removed rom them. <span style="font-size:95%">&mdash;[[User talk:Messedrocker|Signed]], your friendly neighborhood '''[[User:Messedrocker|MessedRocker]]'''.</span> 06:35, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

12569 +++$+++ Bpmullins +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12569 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-02 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.275538500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for making the edit on that template. I was going to give it a few more days, but it really shouldn't be very controversial. Cheers -  +++$+++ Thanks for making the edit on that template. I was going to give it a few more days, but it really shouldn't be very controversial. Cheers - [[User:Bpmullins|BPMullins]] | [[User talk:Bpmullins|Talk]] 21:15, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
12570 +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12569 +++$+++ 12569 +++$+++ 2010-06-03 10:15:00 +++$+++ 1.275585300E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. -  +++$+++ : You're welcome. - [[User:Eu.stefan|eu.stefan]] ([[User talk:Eu.stefan#top|talk]]) 10:15, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

274714 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-11 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.215815400E09 +++$+++ Indef banned user {{userlinks|Madingogo}} is back under a new sock {{userlinks|Pricklyshark}} since it's following the same patten as the indef user.  +++$+++ Indef banned user {{userlinks|Madingogo}} is back under a new sock {{userlinks|Pricklyshark}} since it's following the same patten as the indef user. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 15:30, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
274715 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274714 +++$+++ 274714 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.215815640E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I've indef'd that one too. Cheers Bidgee,  +++$+++ :Thanks, I've indef'd that one too. Cheers Bidgee, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 15:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
274716 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274714 +++$+++ 274715 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.215816480E09 +++$+++ No problem. Also should we add the template like whats been done on {{userlinks|Prester John}} user and talk page?  +++$+++ ::No problem. Also should we add the template like whats been done on {{userlinks|Prester John}} user and talk page? [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 15:48, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
274717 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274714 +++$+++ 274716 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.215816840E09 +++$+++ I just went and added sockblock templates to all the talk pages. Maybe wait until the checkuser comes back so we can add checkuser confirmed tags to the userpages.  +++$+++ :::I just went and added sockblock templates to all the talk pages. Maybe wait until the checkuser comes back so we can add checkuser confirmed tags to the userpages. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 15:54, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
274718 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274714 +++$+++ 274717 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.215817200E09 +++$+++ Thanks. :) Some how I don't think it's going to be the last we see of this person. We will just not back down and just hope they get sick of it.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks. :) Some how I don't think it's going to be the last we see of this person. We will just not back down and just hope they get sick of it. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 16:00, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

526383 +++$+++ Nareek +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.163879640E09 +++$+++ The anonymous IP that you recently blocked today blanked [[The Backyardigans]] article--and helpfully noted that they were blanking the page in the edit summary.  It was missing for about seven hours.  Thought you might want to follow up.  +++$+++ The anonymous IP that you recently blocked today blanked [[The Backyardigans]] article--and helpfully noted that they were blanking the page in the edit summary.  It was missing for about seven hours.  Thought you might want to follow up. [[User:Nareek|Nareek]] 11:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
526384 +++$+++ Nareek +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526383 +++$+++ 526383 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.163898660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the response. What's the policy on someone returning to vandalism after being blocked?  +++$+++ :Thanks for the response. What's the policy on someone returning to vandalism after being blocked? [[User:Nareek|Nareek]] 17:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

536860 +++$+++ KI +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-11 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.139708940E09 +++$+++ I've noticed your work on [[History of Chad]]. You may want to join [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Chad]].  +++$+++ I've noticed your work on [[History of Chad]]. You may want to join [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Chad]]. [[User:KI|KI]] 17:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
536861 +++$+++ KI +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536860 +++$+++ 536860 +++$+++ 2006-02-11 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.139721060E09 +++$+++ FROLINAT and French titles - That's fine. I just want to keep the other titles as redirects.  +++$+++ :FROLINAT and French titles - That's fine. I just want to keep the other titles as redirects. [[User:KI|KI]] 21:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
536862 +++$+++ KI +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536860 +++$+++ 536861 +++$+++ 2006-02-20 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.140488400E09 +++$+++ We have a new member - [[User:Elf-friend|Elf-friend]]. Success!  +++$+++ ::We have a new member - [[User:Elf-friend|Elf-friend]]. Success! [[User:KI|KI]] 18:20, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

12573 +++$+++ The Transhumanist +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-15 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.292417760E09 +++$+++ I look forward to your reply.  ''''' +++$+++ I look forward to your reply.  '''''[[User talk:The Transhumanist|<font color="#880088">Th</font><font color="#0000FF">e Tr</font><font color="#449900">ans</font><font color="#DD9922">hu</font><font color="#DD4400">man</font><font color="#BB0000">ist</font> &nbsp;&nbsp;]]''''' 04:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
12574 +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ Eu.stefan +++$+++ 12573 +++$+++ 12573 +++$+++ 2010-12-15 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.292456520E09 +++$+++ Kind regards,  +++$+++ : Kind regards, [[User:Eu.stefan|eu.stefan]] ([[User talk:Eu.stefan#top|talk]]) 15:42, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

274719 +++$+++ NYScholar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-12 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.215852360E09 +++$+++ Being an administrator does not mean that you can violating [[WP:LOP]] at whim or will.  You are deleting my posts and my material from my filing at [[WP:AN\/I]] and violating both the spirit and the letter of [[WP:3RR]].  I suggest that you stay out of this one.  Your previous involvement made my life miserable for weeks.  Please accept the fact that you are not a neutral observer and please recognize that, despite being an administrator, you are subject to the same [[WP:LOP]] as every other Wikipedia user.  This really does appear to me to be an abuse of administrative privileges, such as they are: see [[WP:ANOT]].   Thank you. -- +++$+++ Being an administrator does not mean that you can violating [[WP:LOP]] at whim or will.  You are deleting my posts and my material from my filing at [[WP:AN/I]] and violating both the spirit and the letter of [[WP:3RR]].  I suggest that you stay out of this one.  Your previous involvement made my life miserable for weeks.  Please accept the fact that you are not a neutral observer and please recognize that, despite being an administrator, you are subject to the same [[WP:LOP]] as every other Wikipedia user.  This really does appear to me to be an abuse of administrative privileges, such as they are: see [[WP:ANOT]].   Thank you. --[[User:NYScholar|NYScholar]] ([[User talk:NYScholar|talk]]) 01:46, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
274720 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.215852780E09 +++$+++ I haven't deleted anything and I most certainly have not violated 3RR. When you make a report to ANi, it's out of your hands and you have no right or ability to control it. I changed the header to a more descriptive one for people scanning the page. I'm sorry but if I have comments to make then I will make them. Once again, if you're unable to deal with others then you need to stop editing Wikipedia until you are able. Thank you.  +++$+++ :I haven't deleted anything and I most certainly have not violated 3RR. When you make a report to ANi, it's out of your hands and you have no right or ability to control it. I changed the header to a more descriptive one for people scanning the page. I'm sorry but if I have comments to make then I will make them. Once again, if you're unable to deal with others then you need to stop editing Wikipedia until you are able. Thank you. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:53, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
274721 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.215852900E09 +++$+++ Also, I might add that your suggestion I've abused administrative privileges is another ludicrous allegation from you. Please show where I have used administrative tools. Please stop posting false information about other users. Thank you kindly.  +++$+++ :Also, I might add that your suggestion I've abused administrative privileges is another ludicrous allegation from you. Please show where I have used administrative tools. Please stop posting false information about other users. Thank you kindly. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
274722 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 274721 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 09:44:00 +++$+++ 1.215881040E09 +++$+++ Agreed - strong claims require strong evidence.  +++$+++ ::Agreed - strong claims require strong evidence. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 09:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
274723 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.215896160E09 +++$+++ I believe it is quite clear that NYScholar's allegations are utterly baseless in this particular instance and typically baseless in general and users should carefully investigate his accusations before accepting them as factual. I was not in 3RR jeopardy, had not deleted his comments, had not used administrative tools, or done anything else he has accused me of doing. NYScholar must cease carelessly making false accusations against other editors and must present diffs as evidence when he does make accusations. His editing practices are disruptive, particularly in the area of inter-personal communication which is a mandatory aspect of a collaborative project. It is by no mere coincidence that he repeatedly ends up in exactly the same conflicts and disputes with numerous different people. Since these issues are not a one-off but rather are chronic, long term and on-going and the same disputes occur over and over with different people, I feel the community should consider implementing community sanctions, such as a restriction on archiving talk pages in less than 24 hours after the last edit to the section, and a blanket prohibition on making accusations without presenting evidence. I intend asking a couple of administrators to review the above and confirm NYScholar's 3RR allegation and other accusations are untrue and utterly baseless.  +++$+++ * I believe it is quite clear that NYScholar's allegations are utterly baseless in this particular instance and typically baseless in general and users should carefully investigate his accusations before accepting them as factual. I was not in 3RR jeopardy, had not deleted his comments, had not used administrative tools, or done anything else he has accused me of doing. NYScholar must cease carelessly making false accusations against other editors and must present diffs as evidence when he does make accusations. His editing practices are disruptive, particularly in the area of inter-personal communication which is a mandatory aspect of a collaborative project. It is by no mere coincidence that he repeatedly ends up in exactly the same conflicts and disputes with numerous different people. Since these issues are not a one-off but rather are chronic, long term and on-going and the same disputes occur over and over with different people, I feel the community should consider implementing community sanctions, such as a restriction on archiving talk pages in less than 24 hours after the last edit to the section, and a blanket prohibition on making accusations without presenting evidence. I intend asking a couple of administrators to review the above and confirm NYScholar's 3RR allegation and other accusations are untrue and utterly baseless. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
274724 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 274723 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.215899040E09 +++$+++ I've been asked to review this, and reading the edit history of the AN\/I page, I believe the above is a reasonable summary of what occurred. There's certainly no evidence that Sarah \"edit-warred\" - the original heading was a mischaracterisation of the situation and its locus, and Sarah's efforts appear to have gone towards presenting a more neutral summary to administrators. Given the high volume of business and the low signal to noise ratio on AN\/I, fixing headings is an important part of housekeeping on the page. This is both normal and encouraged, as many headings are irrelevant or vague to the matters they raise, or are troublesome in nature. I have found no evidence whatsoever that Sarah deleted NYScholar's edits. It's interesting because on 15 February 2008, NYScholar accused Sarah of the exact same thing (see [[User talk:NYScholar\/Archive 19]]). Due to the user's rather odd practice of immediately archiving their talk page making accountability impossible, which continues to this day and is at the focus of the dispute with Stuthomas4 (see history of [[User talk:NYScholar]]), some of it is duplicated at the end of [[User talk:NYScholar\/Archive 18]]. On that page, NYScholar made repeated claims against Sarah suggesting she had \"refactored\" NYScholar's talk page or removed edits by the user. These were then found to be untrue. Furthermore, in editing Sarah's comment on AN\/I, it appears that NYScholar violated the editing guideline [[Wikipedia:TALK#Others.27_comments|relating to editing other people's comments]] themselves. I believe that at an absolute minimum, NYScholar should be sanctioned - in particular, with regard to archiving posts on User talk:NYScholar and from making allegations of this nature against other contributors.  +++$+++ :: I've been asked to review this, and reading the edit history of the AN/I page, I believe the above is a reasonable summary of what occurred. There's certainly no evidence that Sarah "edit-warred" - the original heading was a mischaracterisation of the situation and its locus, and Sarah's efforts appear to have gone towards presenting a more neutral summary to administrators. Given the high volume of business and the low signal to noise ratio on AN/I, fixing headings is an important part of housekeeping on the page. This is both normal and encouraged, as many headings are irrelevant or vague to the matters they raise, or are troublesome in nature. I have found no evidence whatsoever that Sarah deleted NYScholar's edits. It's interesting because on 15 February 2008, NYScholar accused Sarah of the exact same thing (see [[User talk:NYScholar/Archive 19]]). Due to the user's rather odd practice of immediately archiving their talk page making accountability impossible, which continues to this day and is at the focus of the dispute with Stuthomas4 (see history of [[User talk:NYScholar]]), some of it is duplicated at the end of [[User talk:NYScholar/Archive 18]]. On that page, NYScholar made repeated claims against Sarah suggesting she had "refactored" NYScholar's talk page or removed edits by the user. These were then found to be untrue. Furthermore, in editing Sarah's comment on AN/I, it appears that NYScholar violated the editing guideline [[Wikipedia:TALK#Others.27_comments|relating to editing other people's comments]] themselves. I believe that at an absolute minimum, NYScholar should be sanctioned - in particular, with regard to archiving posts on User talk:NYScholar and from making allegations of this nature against other contributors. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 14:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
274725 +++$+++ NYScholar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.215933000E09 +++$+++ (Note: Because this section appeared in colors used in archive boxes, I initially thought this section of Sarah's current talk page is archived; but the section below is the same color, so I guess that is not the case.  This is the section that I have linked to in my current talk page, in response to Sarah's message there. ''' I will not reply to her any further in my current talk page or elsewhere.'''  If there are typographical errors here, please excuse them; I am tired and going back offline.)  -- +++$+++ *(Note: Because this section appeared in colors used in archive boxes, I initially thought this section of Sarah's current talk page is archived; but the section below is the same color, so I guess that is not the case.  This is the section that I have linked to in my current talk page, in response to Sarah's message there. ''' I will not reply to her any further in my current talk page or elsewhere.'''  If there are typographical errors here, please excuse them; I am tired and going back offline.)  --[[User:NYScholar|NYScholar]] ([[User talk:NYScholar|talk]]) 00:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
274726 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.215934500E09 +++$+++ Please stop making multiple edits to my talk page. Please use the preview button. Every time you tweak your post again, I get another orange bar. If you can't post in one or two comments then please go and post on your own page first and tweak it there until you're happy with it so I don't have to be disturbed by four orange bars for all your tweaks. Please learn to use the preview button, for God's sake !  +++$+++ :Please stop making multiple edits to my talk page. Please use the preview button. Every time you tweak your post again, I get another orange bar. If you can't post in one or two comments then please go and post on your own page first and tweak it there until you're happy with it so I don't have to be disturbed by four orange bars for all your tweaks. Please learn to use the preview button, for God's sake ! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:35, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
274727 +++$+++ NYScholar +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 274726 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.215934860E09 +++$+++ Once again (for the upteenth time): ''I do use the preview function in Wikipedia''; sometimes I miss my own errors while previewing, and I fix them if they are important.  I think that you can handle a few orange bars; I see orange bars when you have added comments to my talk page.  I do not criticize people for correcting their own typographical errors in the spirit of clarity.  Please excuse any remaining typographical errors in my previous response.  Sarah knows that I use the preview feature; I have told her that enough times! She chooses to ignore my explanations and to continue to claim that I do not use it.  ''I use it.'' (Previewed.)  -- +++$+++ ::Once again (for the upteenth time): ''I do use the preview function in Wikipedia''; sometimes I miss my own errors while previewing, and I fix them if they are important.  I think that you can handle a few orange bars; I see orange bars when you have added comments to my talk page.  I do not criticize people for correcting their own typographical errors in the spirit of clarity.  Please excuse any remaining typographical errors in my previous response.  Sarah knows that I use the preview feature; I have told her that enough times! She chooses to ignore my explanations and to continue to claim that I do not use it.  ''I use it.'' (Previewed.)  --[[User:NYScholar|NYScholar]] ([[User talk:NYScholar|talk]]) 00:41, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
274728 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274719 +++$+++ 274727 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.215943260E09 +++$+++ Finally, I suggest to you that you ''mea culpa'' and promise to stop your instant archiving practices, promise to stop making false accusations or accusations without evidence, and to work on creating a more congenial collaborative atmosphere and improving your interactions with other editors. Your constant defence of your behaviour and your refusal to acknowledge that, after these issues repeatedly come up in your interactions with numerous different people on numerous different articles, the fault may lie with you and your communication practices, are only demonstrating the need for sanctions. I think if you demonstrated an understanding that your editing practices and your combative style of interacting was at the heart of this issue you would find other editors more willing to give you a chance to adjust your practices. You complain that people are not focusing on Stuthomas4, this is because he has recognised his mistakes and apologised and pledged to try to do better. If you likewise recognised your own fault and pledged some strategy for the future - such as stopping your instant archiving, stopping the groundless and false accusations, stopping accusations without evidence, pledged to work on your interpersonal communication etc - you would find people would be willing to give you another chance but if you continue in this manner, you are going to find that you are subject to formal community-based editing restrictions. Currently on ANI it is clear that people are not supporting your editing style and everyone has endorsed some sort of sanctions from blocks to editing parole and so forth. I think you need to take that on board. As I said, I think if there was some sign that you were taking this feedback on board and recognising some of your own failings, instead of trying to blame everything on me you would find that people would be less inclined to pursue sanctions against you. Please consider.  +++$+++ :::Finally, I suggest to you that you ''mea culpa'' and promise to stop your instant archiving practices, promise to stop making false accusations or accusations without evidence, and to work on creating a more congenial collaborative atmosphere and improving your interactions with other editors. Your constant defence of your behaviour and your refusal to acknowledge that, after these issues repeatedly come up in your interactions with numerous different people on numerous different articles, the fault may lie with you and your communication practices, are only demonstrating the need for sanctions. I think if you demonstrated an understanding that your editing practices and your combative style of interacting was at the heart of this issue you would find other editors more willing to give you a chance to adjust your practices. You complain that people are not focusing on Stuthomas4, this is because he has recognised his mistakes and apologised and pledged to try to do better. If you likewise recognised your own fault and pledged some strategy for the future - such as stopping your instant archiving, stopping the groundless and false accusations, stopping accusations without evidence, pledged to work on your interpersonal communication etc - you would find people would be willing to give you another chance but if you continue in this manner, you are going to find that you are subject to formal community-based editing restrictions. Currently on ANI it is clear that people are not supporting your editing style and everyone has endorsed some sort of sanctions from blocks to editing parole and so forth. I think you need to take that on board. As I said, I think if there was some sign that you were taking this feedback on board and recognising some of your own failings, instead of trying to blame everything on me you would find that people would be less inclined to pursue sanctions against you. Please consider. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

12577 +++$+++ Graeme Bartlett +++$+++ Nath1991 +++$+++ 12577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-22 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.300809240E09 +++$+++ | text =  On [[Albion Park Rail, New South Wales]] you removed a contribution by 27.32.101.44 labelling it as vandalism.  The edit was not vandalism, and was widely reported in the media at the time.  Please check more closely before making negative statements about the work of our contributors. If you continue to behave in this way you may be blocked.  Consider yourself warned.  +++$+++ | text =  On [[Albion Park Rail, New South Wales]] you removed a contribution by 27.32.101.44 labelling it as vandalism.  The edit was not vandalism, and was widely reported in the media at the time.  Please check more closely before making negative statements about the work of our contributors. If you continue to behave in this way you may be blocked.  Consider yourself warned. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 08:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
12578 +++$+++ Graeme Bartlett +++$+++ Nath1991 +++$+++ 12577 +++$+++ 12577 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.300935960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for responding, you are correct in that the text is unreferenced, and that some in the location may not be proud of the fact.  But it would be a matter of debate as to whether the text should be in or not.  But my real point is that it is not vandalism.  So please do not label the removal as removing vandalism.  I note your edit about the famous people in Oak Flats did not have a reference, it was not vandalism either, but I found a reference for it.  +++$+++ :Thanks for responding, you are correct in that the text is unreferenced, and that some in the location may not be proud of the fact.  But it would be a matter of debate as to whether the text should be in or not.  But my real point is that it is not vandalism.  So please do not label the removal as removing vandalism.  I note your edit about the famous people in Oak Flats did not have a reference, it was not vandalism either, but I found a reference for it. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 20:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

12579 +++$+++ Camw +++$+++ Nath1991 +++$+++ 12579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-01 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.301649720E09 +++$+++ Almost certainly an April Fools joke. The source is just on someones webhosting, not the Brisbanetimes site. If I'm wrong then sorry, but let's wait for a reliable source.  +++$+++ Almost certainly an April Fools joke. The source is just on someones webhosting, not the Brisbanetimes site. If I'm wrong then sorry, but let's wait for a reliable source. [[User:Camw|Camw]] ([[User talk:Camw|talk]]) 02:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
12580 +++$+++ Camw +++$+++ Nath1991 +++$+++ 12579 +++$+++ 12579 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.301650200E09 +++$+++ No problem, always best to be extra skeptical about anything today and into tomorrow with US sites!  +++$+++ : No problem, always best to be extra skeptical about anything today and into tomorrow with US sites! [[User:Camw|Camw]] ([[User talk:Camw|talk]]) 02:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

274730 +++$+++ ThuranX +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-14 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.216029180E09 +++$+++ And thank you.  +++$+++ And thank you. [[User:ThuranX|ThuranX]] ([[User talk:ThuranX|talk]]) 02:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
274731 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274730 +++$+++ 274730 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.216029540E09 +++$+++ No worries. Now we just need a neutral admin brave enough to wade in and close the discussion. :)  +++$+++ :No worries. Now we just need a neutral admin brave enough to wade in and close the discussion. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

274732 +++$+++ Beamathan +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274732 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-15 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.216110660E09 +++$+++ I actually read the whole thing. The TL;DR was for everyone else. I read it as \"resigning\" not re-signing. As I read it, the person bitched and moaned needlessly for 90kb and was retiring. Sounds resolved to me.  +++$+++ I actually read the whole thing. The TL;DR was for everyone else. I read it as "resigning" not re-signing. As I read it, the person bitched and moaned needlessly for 90kb and was retiring. Sounds resolved to me. [[User:Beamathan|Beam]] 01:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
274733 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274732 +++$+++ 274732 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.216112640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for clarifying your comment. I appreciate that as I really did read the \"tl;dr\" as being that you had only read the last comment where he said he was \"resigning\". Anyway, we seem to have reached a conclusion now so it's all good. Thanks again for your clarification. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks for clarifying your comment. I appreciate that as I really did read the "tl;dr" as being that you had only read the last comment where he said he was "resigning". Anyway, we seem to have reached a conclusion now so it's all good. Thanks again for your clarification. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:04, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
274734 +++$+++ Beamathan +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274732 +++$+++ 274733 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.216117680E09 +++$+++ No problem. I'm not as big of a jerk as I seem! I have followed NYScohlar the last few days at the noticeboard, making a complete fool out of himself. When I read that he was resigning, I tried to will him to do it by closing it right away. I figured that the best way to summarize that LONG, LONG, LONG bullshit whine-fest was \"TL;DR.\" Just because me and you cared enough to read it, someone passing by reading the Resolved note wouldn't. And I honestly read him as finally retiring. Maybe I was just so happy he was resigning that I ''wanted'' him to be resigned.  +++$+++ ::No problem. I'm not as big of a jerk as I seem! I have followed NYScohlar the last few days at the noticeboard, making a complete fool out of himself. When I read that he was resigning, I tried to will him to do it by closing it right away. I figured that the best way to summarize that LONG, LONG, LONG bullshit whine-fest was "TL;DR." Just because me and you cared enough to read it, someone passing by reading the Resolved note wouldn't. And I honestly read him as finally retiring. Maybe I was just so happy he was resigning that I ''wanted'' him to be resigned. [[User:Beamathan|Beam]] 03:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

264242 +++$+++ Eusebeus +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-28 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.183058160E09 +++$+++ I thought I would try to head off any nastiness at the head. I listed the articles for Season 1 per the notability template and have now posted to the main talk page explaining my rationale. I apologise if my actions seem overly-targeted; I would have expressed the issue first on the talk page, but the 14 day review process seems sufficient to redress the issues raised, Moreover, redirect is '''not''' deletion and any article can be recreated should it met the standards listed at WP:Episodes. I think it is very important that we adhere to the policies and guidelines and I look forward to any thoughts you may have. Above all, I hope that my actions not be misconstrued.  +++$+++ I thought I would try to head off any nastiness at the head. I listed the articles for Season 1 per the notability template and have now posted to the main talk page explaining my rationale. I apologise if my actions seem overly-targeted; I would have expressed the issue first on the talk page, but the 14 day review process seems sufficient to redress the issues raised, Moreover, redirect is '''not''' deletion and any article can be recreated should it met the standards listed at WP:Episodes. I think it is very important that we adhere to the policies and guidelines and I look forward to any thoughts you may have. Above all, I hope that my actions not be misconstrued. [[User:Eusebeus|Eusebeus]] 12:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
264243 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264242 +++$+++ 264242 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.183145880E09 +++$+++ Hello. I deleted the redirect, as the article itself (\"[[List of films with similar themes and release dates]]\") was deleted by someone else after an [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of films with similar themes and release dates (3rd nomination)|AFD]]. I deleted the redundant redirect and removed some links to the page in a couple of 'See also' sections.  +++$+++ :Hello. I deleted the redirect, as the article itself ("[[List of films with similar themes and release dates]]") was deleted by someone else after an [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films with similar themes and release dates (3rd nomination)|AFD]]. I deleted the redundant redirect and removed some links to the page in a couple of 'See also' sections. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

12592 +++$+++ 70.137.133.232 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.312317840E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/70.137.133.232|70.137.133.232]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/70.137.133.232|70.137.133.232]] ([[User talk:70.137.133.232|talk]]) 13:44, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
12593 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12592 +++$+++ 12592 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.312346100E09 +++$+++ DRV is relatively new. If we don't get any outside opinions, it may be time for an article content [[WP:RFC|request for comment]].  +++$+++ :DRV is relatively new. If we don't get any outside opinions, it may be time for an article content [[WP:RFC|request for comment]]. [[user:causa sui|causa sui]] ([[user talk:causa sui|talk]]) 21:35, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

274737 +++$+++ Kamoranakrre T. Eyaelitenan +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-14 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.216078620E09 +++$+++ I haven't been on in awhile, but I've just seen the notice on my talk page that the article [[Lion's Choice]] was being (and has now since been) speedily deleted for being a blatant advertisement.  I know that the version I created was certainly not an advertisement. (It was nothing more than a few sentence stub!)  Apparently it was subsequently filled in with substandard copy.  Should I go ahead and re-create the article, or could one of my earlier revisions be restored?  I certainly wouldn't want it to just get deleted again; thus I ask.  If it would help the article to remain, I could expand upon it a bit as well.  +++$+++ I haven't been on in awhile, but I've just seen the notice on my talk page that the article [[Lion's Choice]] was being (and has now since been) speedily deleted for being a blatant advertisement.  I know that the version I created was certainly not an advertisement. (It was nothing more than a few sentence stub!)  Apparently it was subsequently filled in with substandard copy.  Should I go ahead and re-create the article, or could one of my earlier revisions be restored?  I certainly wouldn't want it to just get deleted again; thus I ask.  If it would help the article to remain, I could expand upon it a bit as well. [[User:Kamoranakrre T. Eyaelitenan|Kamoranakrre T. Eyaelitenan]] ([[User talk:Kamoranakrre T. Eyaelitenan|talk]]) 16:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
274738 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274737 +++$+++ 274737 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.216106400E09 +++$+++ I just went back and checked that article and an IP added three paragraphs which included information about the \"quality product\" and the \"clean, quick and courteous manner\" of service and then proceeded to list menu items - \"real roasted beef sandwiches, ham sandwiches, french fries, cole slaw, potato chips, soft drinks and soft serve ice cream products.\". I'm quite happy to give you a copy of the article as you wrote it but before you put it back in the mainspace, I would suggest you add at least a sentence or two explaining how\/why this restaurant is notable because I think if it were reposted as is there is a good chance it will be deleted as lacking an assertion of notability. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I just went back and checked that article and an IP added three paragraphs which included information about the "quality product" and the "clean, quick and courteous manner" of service and then proceeded to list menu items - "real roasted beef sandwiches, ham sandwiches, french fries, cole slaw, potato chips, soft drinks and soft serve ice cream products.". I'm quite happy to give you a copy of the article as you wrote it but before you put it back in the mainspace, I would suggest you add at least a sentence or two explaining how/why this restaurant is notable because I think if it were reposted as is there is a good chance it will be deleted as lacking an assertion of notability. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:20, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
274739 +++$+++ Kamoranakrre T. Eyaelitenan +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274737 +++$+++ 274738 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.216156320E09 +++$+++ That'd be handy; thanks! I'll see what I can do with it.  +++$+++ ::That'd be handy; thanks! I'll see what I can do with it. [[User:Kamoranakrre T. Eyaelitenan|Kamoranakrre T. Eyaelitenan]] ([[User talk:Kamoranakrre T. Eyaelitenan|talk]]) 14:12, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

12594 +++$+++ 70.137.158.46 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12594 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312358520E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/70.137.158.46|70.137.158.46]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/70.137.158.46|70.137.158.46]] ([[User talk:70.137.158.46|talk]]) 01:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
12595 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12594 +++$+++ 12594 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312415160E09 +++$+++ Are you saying I should semi protect the article?  +++$+++ :Are you saying I should semi protect the article? [[user:causa sui|causa sui]] ([[user talk:causa sui|talk]]) 16:46, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

536883 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-21 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.143008640E09 +++$+++ Aldux,with all respect to your POV and your knowledge in the matter and your good will,i would like to point that RoM had indeed irrendistic claims over greece,since they printed maps showing that their country should extend to Olympus and since they used symbols from the greek region of macedonia as official(not only the Vergina Sun,but also the White Tower in Thessaloniki).also,they had an article in their constitution talking about protection of 'Macedonians' in neighbouring countries,which could also be seen as interfering in other states' issues.furthermore,their official education system teaches them that they are descendants of the ancient macedonians who happen to be slavicized,that's why i am insisting so much in making this distinction clear in the article.what is obvious to u(that the ancient macedonians were a different people) is not to them.ciao-- +++$+++ Aldux,with all respect to your POV and your knowledge in the matter and your good will,i would like to point that RoM had indeed irrendistic claims over greece,since they printed maps showing that their country should extend to Olympus and since they used symbols from the greek region of macedonia as official(not only the Vergina Sun,but also the White Tower in Thessaloniki).also,they had an article in their constitution talking about protection of 'Macedonians' in neighbouring countries,which could also be seen as interfering in other states' issues.furthermore,their official education system teaches them that they are descendants of the ancient macedonians who happen to be slavicized,that's why i am insisting so much in making this distinction clear in the article.what is obvious to u(that the ancient macedonians were a different people) is not to them.ciao--[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 22:24, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
536884 +++$+++ Realek +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536883 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.143022680E09 +++$+++ Simply not true. But they should teach the mixing theory in my oppinion -- +++$+++ :*Simply not true. But they should teach the mixing theory in my oppinion --[[User:Realek|Realek]] 02:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
536885 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536883 +++$+++ 536883 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.143024180E09 +++$+++ Lastly and in brief,i have watched documentaries from your country's schools and also the books.so,don't tell me that u are not taught that u are descendants of the ancient macedonians.at least other users from your country have admitted that.-- +++$+++ *Lastly and in brief,i have watched documentaries from your country's schools and also the books.so,don't tell me that u are not taught that u are descendants of the ancient macedonians.at least other users from your country have admitted that.--[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 02:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
536886 +++$+++ Realek +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536883 +++$+++ 536883 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.143081600E09 +++$+++ And I couldnt stay silent toy your dragging of the unrelated issue of albanian minority rights in all this. They had substantial minority rights before 2001, and now they have a lot more, making Macedonia a world pioneer in a lot of areas of minority rights (If you wish I'll explain this on your page). Greece on the other side allows the Macedonians to organize politicaly and to print a magazine... WOW! Anyway those things are not minority rights at all - but basic human rights. And they have been allowed to do this only recently. Yes - Greece is a shining example of Democracy! -- +++$+++ : And I couldnt stay silent toy your dragging of the unrelated issue of albanian minority rights in all this. They had substantial minority rights before 2001, and now they have a lot more, making Macedonia a world pioneer in a lot of areas of minority rights (If you wish I'll explain this on your page). Greece on the other side allows the Macedonians to organize politicaly and to print a magazine... WOW! Anyway those things are not minority rights at all - but basic human rights. And they have been allowed to do this only recently. Yes - Greece is a shining example of Democracy! --[[User:Realek|Realek]] 18:40, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

12596 +++$+++ 70.137.131.90 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.312424700E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/70.137.131.90|70.137.131.90]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/70.137.131.90|70.137.131.90]] ([[User talk:70.137.131.90|talk]]) 19:25, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
12597 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12596 +++$+++ 12596 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312426020E09 +++$+++ Well, it's unprotected. So maybe the dispute is resolved ''de facto''.  +++$+++ :Well, it's unprotected. So maybe the dispute is resolved ''de facto''. [[user:causa sui|causa sui]] ([[user talk:causa sui|talk]]) 19:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

585265 +++$+++ Catgut +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585265 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-29 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.206784380E09 +++$+++ Hello, could you please devote some of your precious time to taking a quick look at this article. Recently the information regarding her measurements was changed, the old source remained. As much as the new info reverted by me was completely unsourced, I tend to think that also her old\/current measurements were\/are questionable. They were sourced, but I'm not too sure whether the source was\/is actually reliable. What do you think? Thanks in advance for your opinion. Best regards -- +++$+++ Hello, could you please devote some of your precious time to taking a quick look at this article. Recently the information regarding her measurements was changed, the old source remained. As much as the new info reverted by me was completely unsourced, I tend to think that also her old/current measurements were/are questionable. They were sourced, but I'm not too sure whether the source was/is actually reliable. What do you think? Thanks in advance for your opinion. Best regards --[[User:Catgut|Catgut]] ([[User talk:Catgut|talk]]) 02:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
585266 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585265 +++$+++ 585265 +++$+++ 2008-03-29 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.206839340E09 +++$+++ Doesn't look like a bad source to me: but if you're unsure, the best thing to do is to look up her measurements on some other websites, and if necessary, provide more than one source for her measurements.  +++$+++ :Doesn't look like a bad source to me: but if you're unsure, the best thing to do is to look up her measurements on some other websites, and if necessary, provide more than one source for her measurements. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
585267 +++$+++ Catgut +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585265 +++$+++ 585266 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.207654740E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your advice, forgot to reply!!! Best, -- +++$+++ ::Thanks again for your advice, forgot to reply!!! Best, --[[User:Catgut|Catgut]] ([[User talk:Catgut|talk]]) 04:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
585268 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585265 +++$+++ 585267 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.207692900E09 +++$+++ That's fine: glad to help. :)  +++$+++ :::That's fine: glad to help. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 15:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

274742 +++$+++ Lester +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274742 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-11 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.215827400E09 +++$+++ In the category [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Prester_John Wikipedia sockpuppets of Prester John], the entries show as talk pages. Possibly the tags need to be placed on the uesr pages? ''' +++$+++ In the category [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Prester_John Wikipedia sockpuppets of Prester John], the entries show as talk pages. Possibly the tags need to be placed on the uesr pages? '''[[User:Lester|<span style="color:green">Lester</span>]]''' 18:50, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
274743 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274742 +++$+++ 274742 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.215841620E09 +++$+++ Nah, it doesn't matter as long as either the talk or the user page is tagged and there's no point tagging both as you end up doubled-up.  +++$+++ :Nah, it doesn't matter as long as either the talk or the user page is tagged and there's no point tagging both as you end up doubled-up. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 22:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
274744 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274742 +++$+++ 274743 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.215865620E09 +++$+++ {{userlinks|166.190.241.149}}. and no doubt there are more. +++$+++ ::{{userlinks|166.190.241.149}}. and no doubt there are more.[[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 05:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
274745 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274742 +++$+++ 274744 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 06:17:00 +++$+++ 1.215868620E09 +++$+++ {{userlinks|166.191.206.160}}  +++$+++ :::{{userlinks|166.191.206.160}} [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 06:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

12599 +++$+++ 70.137.131.90 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.312427820E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/70.137.131.90|70.137.131.90]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/70.137.131.90|70.137.131.90]] ([[User talk:70.137.131.90|talk]]) 20:17, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
12600 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12599 +++$+++ 12599 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312428060E09 +++$+++ Yeah, sometimes you have to purge the cache.  +++$+++ :Yeah, sometimes you have to purge the cache. [[user:causa sui|causa sui]] ([[user talk:causa sui|talk]]) 20:21, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

12601 +++$+++ 70.137.131.90 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.312428480E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/70.137.131.90|70.137.131.90]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/70.137.131.90|70.137.131.90]] ([[User talk:70.137.131.90|talk]]) 20:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
12602 +++$+++ Jasper Deng +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12601 +++$+++ 12601 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.312428540E09 +++$+++ Try the purge function, by adding &action=purge at the end of the article URL. +++$+++ :Try the purge function, by adding &action=purge at the end of the article URL.[[User:Jasper Deng|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng|(talk)]] 20:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

274746 +++$+++ Timeshift9 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-12 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.215868920E09 +++$+++ No point blocking them though as they're most likely allocated randomly upon each re-connection for each user by his ISP.  +++$+++ No point blocking them though as they're most likely allocated randomly upon each re-connection for each user by his ISP. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 06:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
274747 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274746 +++$+++ 274746 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.215869100E09 +++$+++ but could be added to the sock puppet page as IP's used. Though something needs to be done to stop it. I've request temp full protection for some pages.  +++$+++ :but could be added to the sock puppet page as IP's used. Though something needs to be done to stop it. I've request temp full protection for some pages. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 06:25, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
274748 +++$+++ Timeshift9 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274746 +++$+++ 274747 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.215869820E09 +++$+++ Agree.  +++$+++ ::Agree. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 06:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
274749 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274746 +++$+++ 274746 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.215881460E09 +++$+++ Thanks Bidgee for all that, that's great. We've range blocked 166.190.32.161\/24 and 166.191.32.161\/24, so hopefully that will take him out for the rest of the night. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks Bidgee for all that, that's great. We've range blocked 166.190.32.161/24 and 166.191.32.161/24, so hopefully that will take him out for the rest of the night. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

12603 +++$+++ 70.137.134.93 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12603 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.312528080E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/70.137.134.93|70.137.134.93]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/70.137.134.93|70.137.134.93]] ([[User talk:70.137.134.93|talk]]) 00:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
12604 +++$+++ DMacks +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12603 +++$+++ 12603 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.312528680E09 +++$+++ The technical protection is separate from the padlock icon. The former is what actually controls editability and has automatic expiration and other settings according to the admin who sets the protection. The latter is just normal page content that someone (or some bot) has to remember to change when the protection status changes.  +++$+++ :The technical protection is separate from the padlock icon. The former is what actually controls editability and has automatic expiration and other settings according to the admin who sets the protection. The latter is just normal page content that someone (or some bot) has to remember to change when the protection status changes. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 00:18, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

12605 +++$+++ 70.137.134.93 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12605 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312555800E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/70.137.134.93|70.137.134.93]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/70.137.134.93|70.137.134.93]] ([[User talk:70.137.134.93|talk]]) 07:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
12606 +++$+++ DMacks +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12605 +++$+++ 12605 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.312528980E09 +++$+++ 70.137, one item on the DRV is what several have said elsewhere: if you created a named account, it would be trivial for an uninvolved admin to prevent IPs (such as ones who blindly edit-war and\/or contradict cited sources) from editing, without affecting your ability to make edits. That seems like a really simple solution to implement and doesn't require lengthy discussion on notice-boards.  +++$+++ :70.137, one item on the DRV is what several have said elsewhere: if you created a named account, it would be trivial for an uninvolved admin to prevent IPs (such as ones who blindly edit-war and/or contradict cited sources) from editing, without affecting your ability to make edits. That seems like a really simple solution to implement and doesn't require lengthy discussion on notice-boards. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 00:23, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

274750 +++$+++ Nunquam Dormio +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274750 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-12 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.215917460E09 +++$+++ [[User talk:207.47.96.26]] seems to have made edits very similar to these sock puppets.  +++$+++ [[User talk:207.47.96.26]] seems to have made edits very similar to these sock puppets. [[User:Nunquam Dormio|Nunquam Dormio]] ([[User talk:Nunquam Dormio|talk]]) 19:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
274751 +++$+++ Nunquam Dormio +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274750 +++$+++ 274750 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.215917940E09 +++$+++ I think he moved operations to a Hotel Sofitel!  +++$+++ :I think he moved operations to a Hotel Sofitel! [[User:Nunquam Dormio|Nunquam Dormio]] ([[User talk:Nunquam Dormio|talk]]) 19:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
274752 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274750 +++$+++ 274751 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.216036560E09 +++$+++ Possible sock puppet {{userlinks|Hypopostumus}}. Also someone just posted on {{userlinks|Matilda}}'s talkpage another possible sock is {{userlinks|Putz removal}}.  +++$+++ ::Possible sock puppet {{userlinks|Hypopostumus}}. Also someone just posted on {{userlinks|Matilda}}'s talkpage another possible sock is {{userlinks|Putz removal}}. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 04:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
274753 +++$+++ Lester +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274750 +++$+++ 274752 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.216037580E09 +++$+++ Looking at the IP pattern, the regular base is in [[Oakland, California]]. However, last weekend he appeared to book into a hotel in LA to do his vandalism. On Monday it appears was back in San Francisco, just over the bay from his base in Oakland, though it may have still been Oakland (IP trance may not be that accurate) --''' +++$+++ :::Looking at the IP pattern, the regular base is in [[Oakland, California]]. However, last weekend he appeared to book into a hotel in LA to do his vandalism. On Monday it appears was back in San Francisco, just over the bay from his base in Oakland, though it may have still been Oakland (IP trance may not be that accurate) --'''[[User:Lester|<span style="color:green">Lester</span>]]''' 05:13, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
274754 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274750 +++$+++ 274753 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.216040640E09 +++$+++ Always difficult to tell - recently we had a trace to Wollongong which turned out to be close to Newcastle instead. Depends on the reliability of the IP provider's geolocation, or even whether they geolocate beyond a certain level.  +++$+++ ::::Always difficult to tell - recently we had a trace to Wollongong which turned out to be close to Newcastle instead. Depends on the reliability of the IP provider's geolocation, or even whether they geolocate beyond a certain level. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 06:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
274755 +++$+++ Merbabu +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274750 +++$+++ 274754 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.216041720E09 +++$+++ {{userlinks|32.158.27.68}} - now he is in in Florida. he he. PJ would have us believe he is a married man. lol. -- +++$+++ :::::{{userlinks|32.158.27.68}} - now he is in in Florida. he he. PJ would have us believe he is a married man. lol. --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] ([[User talk:Merbabu|talk]]) 06:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
274756 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274750 +++$+++ 274755 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.216043400E09 +++$+++ {{userlinks|32.157.119.190}}  +++$+++ ::::::{{userlinks|32.157.119.190}} [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 06:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
274757 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274750 +++$+++ 274755 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.216051380E09 +++$+++ Yes, well, my own previous ISP assigned IP used to geolocate to a town in Queensland when I and my ISP are (and always have been) in Melbourne. Also, a friend of mine, an admin, owns several proxy IP addresses that they use to access sites they consider to be unsafe and the IPs geolocate to a country different to where this person lives. It is possible that PJ has access to proxies, too. I don't think people should be reading anything into his location, lifestyle or marital status as a result of the IP addresses he accesses. It's prolly better not to even discuss any of this on-site other than to note any accounts or IP addresses that need blocking because you can be assured that he is monitoring what we discuss, particularly Lester and I think he will be encouraged by and get off on Lester's reaction. Best to revert, block and ignore, IMO. And if anything needs to be discussed beyond \"please block xyz,\" I think it's best to do so privately via email.  +++$+++ ::::::Yes, well, my own previous ISP assigned IP used to geolocate to a town in Queensland when I and my ISP are (and always have been) in Melbourne. Also, a friend of mine, an admin, owns several proxy IP addresses that they use to access sites they consider to be unsafe and the IPs geolocate to a country different to where this person lives. It is possible that PJ has access to proxies, too. I don't think people should be reading anything into his location, lifestyle or marital status as a result of the IP addresses he accesses. It's prolly better not to even discuss any of this on-site other than to note any accounts or IP addresses that need blocking because you can be assured that he is monitoring what we discuss, particularly Lester and I think he will be encouraged by and get off on Lester's reaction. Best to revert, block and ignore, IMO. And if anything needs to be discussed beyond "please block xyz," I think it's best to do so privately via email. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:03, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
274758 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274750 +++$+++ 274757 +++$+++ 2008-07-20 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.216604940E09 +++$+++ {{userlinks|166.194.162.69}}  -  +++$+++ :::::::{{userlinks|166.194.162.69}}  - [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 18:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

12607 +++$+++ 70.137.134.93 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12607 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312555800E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/70.137.134.93|70.137.134.93]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/70.137.134.93|70.137.134.93]] ([[User talk:70.137.134.93|talk]]) 07:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
12608 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ 12607 +++$+++ 12607 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.312582380E09 +++$+++ This isn't black and white. We don't (or shouldn't) use semi-protection just to privilege registered users over unregistered users in content disputes. But disruptive or abusing editing is a different animal. Often, if all of the abuse is coming from IPs, the article may be semi-protected to prevent abuse with the assumption (or crossed fingers) that people who are serious about improving the encyclopedia will register accounts to get around it.  +++$+++ :This isn't black and white. We don't (or shouldn't) use semi-protection just to privilege registered users over unregistered users in content disputes. But disruptive or abusing editing is a different animal. Often, if all of the abuse is coming from IPs, the article may be semi-protected to prevent abuse with the assumption (or crossed fingers) that people who are serious about improving the encyclopedia will register accounts to get around it. [[user:causa sui|causa sui]] ([[user talk:causa sui|talk]]) 15:13, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

536897 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536897 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-26 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.143364920E09 +++$+++ Please, don't report Kagan. Ti prego perche credo che se lo fai, le resultate non sarrano compatibile con il \"spirito\" de la regola [[WP:3RR]].  +++$+++ Please, don't report Kagan. Ti prego perche credo che se lo fai, le resultate non sarrano compatibile con il "spirito" de la regola [[WP:3RR]]. [[User:NikoSilver|<font style="background: #777;">&nbsp;</font><font style="background: #888;" color="white">N</font><font style="background: #999;" color="white">i</font><font style="background: #aaa;" color="white">k</font><font style="background: #bbb;" color="white">o</font><font style="background: #ccc;" color="white"><b>S</b></font><font style="background: #bbb;" color="white"><b>il</b></font><font style="background: #aaa;" color="white"><b>v</b></font><font style="background: #999;" color="white"><b>e</b></font><font style="background: #888;" color="white"><b>r</b></font><font style="background: #777">&nbsp;]]</font>&nbsp;<sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]][[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]][[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 01:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
536898 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536897 +++$+++ 536897 +++$+++ 2006-03-26 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.143365520E09 +++$+++ I guess I was late, but from your comment at [[WP:AN3#User:Adkagansu]], I see I wouldn't be able to change your mind. Evidently, there were more things than the 3RR to it...  +++$+++ :I guess I was late, but from your comment at [[WP:AN3#User:Adkagansu]], I see I wouldn't be able to change your mind. Evidently, there were more things than the 3RR to it... [[User:NikoSilver|<font style="background: #777;">&nbsp;</font><font style="background: #888;" color="white">N</font><font style="background: #999;" color="white">i</font><font style="background: #aaa;" color="white">k</font><font style="background: #bbb;" color="white">o</font><font style="background: #ccc;" color="white"><b>S</b></font><font style="background: #bbb;" color="white"><b>il</b></font><font style="background: #aaa;" color="white"><b>v</b></font><font style="background: #999;" color="white"><b>e</b></font><font style="background: #888;" color="white"><b>r</b></font><font style="background: #777">&nbsp;]]</font>&nbsp;<sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]][[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]][[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 01:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
536899 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536897 +++$+++ 536898 +++$+++ 2006-03-29 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.143664740E09 +++$+++ Ciao professore (per mio italiano)! ;-]  +++$+++ ::Ciao professore (per mio italiano)! ;-] [[User:NikoSilver|<font style="background: #777;">&nbsp;</font><font style="background: #888;" color="white">N</font><font style="background: #999;" color="white">i</font><font style="background: #aaa;" color="white">k</font><font style="background: #bbb;" color="white">o</font><b><font style="background: #ccc;" color="white">S</font><font style="background: #bbb;" color="white">il</font><font style="background: #aaa;" color="white">v</font><font style="background: #999;" color="white">e</font><font style="background: #888;" color="white">r</font><font style="background: #777">&nbsp;</font></b>]]&nbsp;<sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]][[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]][[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 12:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
536900 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536897 +++$+++ 536897 +++$+++ 2006-04-02 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.144041780E09 +++$+++ Pensi tu, che sostegno le azioni de mio paese indiscriminatamente, senza giudicare cio che e giusto e cio che e sbagliato? Loro? Per questo tipo di nazionalizmo nuovo che ho scritto, che pensi? Credo che ci sono tanti utenti in WP, che credono che sono liberali, ma in effeto sono naivi strumenti di loro chi sono i piu grandi crypto-nazionalisti desiderando renderci tutti identici.  +++$+++ :Pensi tu, che sostegno le azioni de mio paese indiscriminatamente, senza giudicare cio che e giusto e cio che e sbagliato? Loro? Per questo tipo di nazionalizmo nuovo che ho scritto, che pensi? Credo che ci sono tanti utenti in WP, che credono che sono liberali, ma in effeto sono naivi strumenti di loro chi sono i piu grandi crypto-nazionalisti desiderando renderci tutti identici. [[User:NikoSilver|<font color ="white"><font style="background: #777;">&nbsp;<font style="background: #888;">N<font style="background: #999;">i<font style="background: #aaa;">k<font style="background: #bbb;">o<font style="background: #ccc;"><b>S</b></font><b>il</b></font><b>v</b></font><b>e</b></font><b>r</b></font>&nbsp;</font></font>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 22:23, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
536901 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536897 +++$+++ 536899 +++$+++ 2006-04-03 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.144129320E09 +++$+++ No, no, no. Non lo credevo, era una domanda retorica. Per favore guarda come il \"nuovo-tipo-di-nationalismo\" impazza alla talk dell'articolo per [[FYROM]] (gli \"impartial third\"). Guarda che gli altri non accettano di includere il nome che loro paese a accettato da UN, alla introduzione del articolo. Guarda che risposte danno quando dico che ''anche'' questo nome conta \xe9 deve essere presentato in maniera quasi-uguale. Aiuto, non ne posso piu!  +++$+++ :::No, no, no. Non lo credevo, era una domanda retorica. Per favore guarda come il "nuovo-tipo-di-nationalismo" impazza alla talk dell'articolo per [[FYROM]] (gli "impartial third"). Guarda che gli altri non accettano di includere il nome che loro paese a accettato da UN, alla introduzione del articolo. Guarda che risposte danno quando dico che ''anche'' questo nome conta é deve essere presentato in maniera quasi-uguale. Aiuto, non ne posso piu! [[User:NikoSilver|<font color ="white"><font style="background: #777;">&nbsp;<font style="background: #888;">N<font style="background: #999;">i<font style="background: #aaa;">k<font style="background: #bbb;">o<font style="background: #ccc;"><b>S</b></font><b>il</b></font><b>v</b></font><b>e</b></font><b>r</b></font>&nbsp;</font></font>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 22:42, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
536902 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536897 +++$+++ 536901 +++$+++ 2006-04-04 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.144203360E09 +++$+++ Non e una cospirazione, ma sembra comme una epidemia. Hai dimenticato uno utente che dice che e di noi, ma vive \"a l'altra parte de lo lago\". Il suo nome commincia di 'E'. Ha fatto tutto per lasciare l'articolo cosi, senza indicazione de lo secondo nome ufficiale a la testa, e con un piccolissimo link allo section per la disputa di nome. Credo che lui non e de la terza categoria, comme le ho scritto alla fine dei [[Talk:Republic of Macedonia#Straw-ncensus and WP:NPOV.23Undue weight|miei argumenti]], ma da la prima! Ti dico un secreto: sonno anch'io d'accordo con la versione di ChrisO. Quante volte devi chiedere di piu, per prendere di meno (si chiama diplomatia -e e una parola greca). Aspetiamo il fino di questa comedia...  +++$+++ ::::Non e una cospirazione, ma sembra comme una epidemia. Hai dimenticato uno utente che dice che e di noi, ma vive "a l'altra parte de lo lago". Il suo nome commincia di 'E'. Ha fatto tutto per lasciare l'articolo cosi, senza indicazione de lo secondo nome ufficiale a la testa, e con un piccolissimo link allo section per la disputa di nome. Credo che lui non e de la terza categoria, comme le ho scritto alla fine dei [[Talk:Republic of Macedonia#Straw-ncensus and WP:NPOV.23Undue weight|miei argumenti]], ma da la prima! Ti dico un secreto: sonno anch'io d'accordo con la versione di ChrisO. Quante volte devi chiedere di piu, per prendere di meno (si chiama diplomatia -e e una parola greca). Aspetiamo il fino di questa comedia... [[User:NikoSilver|<font color ="white"><font style="background: #777;">&nbsp;<font style="background: #888;">N<font style="background: #999;">i<font style="background: #aaa;">k<font style="background: #bbb;">o<font style="background: #ccc;"><b>S</b></font><b>il</b></font><b>v</b></font><b>e</b></font><b>r</b></font>&nbsp;</font></font>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 19:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

12612 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12612 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-27 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.303962660E09 +++$+++ I agreed with your Rfc comment about \"not any editor\". I think 10 serious editors are better than 100 error prone ones. Now, FYI, [[User_talk:The_Blade_of_the_Northern_Lights#Serious_Wikipedians]]. Ideas?  +++$+++ I agreed with your Rfc comment about "not any editor". I think 10 serious editors are better than 100 error prone ones. Now, FYI, [[User_talk:The_Blade_of_the_Northern_Lights#Serious_Wikipedians]]. Ideas? [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 20:51, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
12613 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12612 +++$+++ 12612 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.303969020E09 +++$+++ <small>(Fixed your link above) <\/small>I'm only half paying attention today. Super busy. I'll turn my attention to it when I can do it justice.  +++$+++ :<small>(Fixed your link above) </small>I'm only half paying attention today. Super busy. I'll turn my attention to it when I can do it justice. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 22:37, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
12614 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12612 +++$+++ 12612 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.303996800E09 +++$+++ And I've replied now. <small>(And I fixed my \"fix\"!) <\/small> +++$+++ :And I've replied now. <small>(And I fixed my "fix"!) </small>[[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 06:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
12615 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12612 +++$+++ 12614 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.304146920E09 +++$+++ Now [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia reliability]] has a page. If you would like to just add your name as a participant there, it will gain momentum based on user endorsement. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Now [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia reliability]] has a page. If you would like to just add your name as a participant there, it will gain momentum based on user endorsement. Thanks. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 00:02, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
12616 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12612 +++$+++ 12615 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.304164980E09 +++$+++ I've been giving it serious consideration for over a day now, and I guess I should have let you know that before now. Several concerns are getting in the way of my casually tossing four tildes onto the page. For one thing, I've never joined any WikiProject, and I'm not sure I want to become a \"joiner\" at this point. If I did decide to stop being the Lone Ranger and start collaborating in a structured way, I think I might be of more use to one of the more established projects, such as the Guild of Copyeditors or perhaps one related to a subject with which I'm familiar enough to write about intelligently. I also am concerned about any sustained collaborative effort because off I'm not sure I can commit to giving the time and close attention something like that would deserve. If I'm going to commit to doing something, I'd rather not do it halfway.<p>More specifically, I also have specific concerns about two of your project's stated objectives, and I'm not sure whether an endorsement of them is implied in the act of joining up.<p>So I'm still weighing my options, I guess. I do appreciate the invitation and wish you every success with your project, whether I sign on to it or not.  +++$+++ :::I've been giving it serious consideration for over a day now, and I guess I should have let you know that before now. Several concerns are getting in the way of my casually tossing four tildes onto the page. For one thing, I've never joined any WikiProject, and I'm not sure I want to become a "joiner" at this point. If I did decide to stop being the Lone Ranger and start collaborating in a structured way, I think I might be of more use to one of the more established projects, such as the Guild of Copyeditors or perhaps one related to a subject with which I'm familiar enough to write about intelligently. I also am concerned about any sustained collaborative effort because off I'm not sure I can commit to giving the time and close attention something like that would deserve. If I'm going to commit to doing something, I'd rather not do it halfway.<p>More specifically, I also have specific concerns about two of your project's stated objectives, and I'm not sure whether an endorsement of them is implied in the act of joining up.<p>So I'm still weighing my options, I guess. I do appreciate the invitation and wish you every success with your project, whether I sign on to it or not. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 05:03, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
12617 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12612 +++$+++ 12616 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.304176440E09 +++$+++ The objectives are subject to debate by the participants of course. So which objectives bother you? That would be good to know. As in any other Wiki project or Wikipage, no one agrees on anything 100%, but discuss it. As for a \"long term contract\" for you to do free work, none exist in Wikipedia. People can walk off anywhere any time.  +++$+++ ::::The objectives are subject to debate by the participants of course. So which objectives bother you? That would be good to know. As in any other Wiki project or Wikipage, no one agrees on anything 100%, but discuss it. As for a "long term contract" for you to do free work, none exist in Wikipedia. People can walk off anywhere any time. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 08:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
12618 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12612 +++$+++ 12617 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.304209980E09 +++$+++ That is ''technically'' true, of course; no one has a gun to his head around here. But I certainly wouldn't feel good about walking off in the middle of something I've invested time and effort in.<p>As I said on Blade's talk page, I am unsure about the last two objectives. I'm happy to discuss that in some detail, but I'm only online for a few minutes today.  +++$+++ :::::That is ''technically'' true, of course; no one has a gun to his head around here. But I certainly wouldn't feel good about walking off in the middle of something I've invested time and effort in.<p>As I said on Blade's talk page, I am unsure about the last two objectives. I'm happy to discuss that in some detail, but I'm only online for a few minutes today. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 17:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
12619 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12612 +++$+++ 12618 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.304213460E09 +++$+++ The last objective in probably not a \"reliability objective\" in fact now that I think about it but a general content protection objective. I will try to separate that out and add something else. What do you suggest as item 7 once that goes away. The 6th objective about reliability over new articles may in fact bother some other people too, so I will think about softening that. Ideas?  +++$+++ ::::::The last objective in probably not a "reliability objective" in fact now that I think about it but a general content protection objective. I will try to separate that out and add something else. What do you suggest as item 7 once that goes away. The 6th objective about reliability over new articles may in fact bother some other people too, so I will think about softening that. Ideas? [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 18:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
12620 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12612 +++$+++ 12619 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.304259600E09 +++$+++ All right. This is likely to be sort of long, so bear with me. For starters, I'd say that Item 7 ''is'' a reliability objective, broadly construed, inasmuch as bad edits of various sorts can and do make articles unreliable. But the \"semi-automated tools for 'content protection'\" concerns me. I don't know what a semi-automated tool would be, in this context. Do you mean something like Pending Changes\/Flagged Revisions? Or a Twinkle-type gadget? The latter would help with vandalism, including outright spam, but not so much with \"thinly veiled commercial promotion\". As for the former, it may be inevitable eventually, but I can't say I want to have much do with it in any incarnation I've seen to date (and the issues it raises aren't limited to a lack of technical sophistication). In either case, I'm not sure how a WikiProject is going to go about encouraging the creation of such technologically-based solutions. Even if we're just talking bots, those are created by people who have the skills and the time and who are interested in that sort of thing. So I guess I'd just get rid of Item 7 for the moment. I don't see why anything need replace it.<p>I'm conflicted about Item 6. No one could reasonably argue with its first sentence, but the second sentence is quite debatable. Unless we're quite sure that a decade of article-writing has filled all the significant gaps, we shouldn't be emphasizing the improvement of existing articles over the creation of new ones. I, for one, am not at all sure. Although nearly all of the \"low-hanging fruit\" may have been picked by now, I'm not persuaded that there aren't significant gaps yet. Fwiw, I still not infrequently encounter nonexistent articles when I come here to look something up. Sometimes they've been deleted\u2014perhaps wrongly\u2014and sometimes they're redirects that deserve their own articles and sometimes they're just not here at all and never were. And I'm just not sure that filling those gaps isn't of the highest importance.<p>Consider also that while plenty of editors are flexible and can contribute in different ways, others are not and cannot. For instance, some editors are better at creating something from scratch but get really bored or inept when faced with the task of molding and polishing something beyond its fledgling stages. By the same token, others thrive on sourcing content, rewriting text, finding and arranging graphics, adding infoboxes and the like but couldn't write a passable stub to save their life. No amount of cajoling or coercion will turn one kind of editor into the other kind. Editors with enough self-insight will realize where their strengths and weaknesses lie, but others will make futile efforts to conform to community standards and wind up in situations where their incompetence gets them into trouble. Bottom line for me on this one: while I support placing certain limits on article creation, I don't want to discourage any competent editor from writing a new article. Ever.<p>Specifics aside, I guess I might as well ask you in very general terms: why exactly do you think your project is a good idea? What would your project supply that is lacking in the WP community currently?  +++$+++ :::::::All right. This is likely to be sort of long, so bear with me. For starters, I'd say that Item 7 ''is'' a reliability objective, broadly construed, inasmuch as bad edits of various sorts can and do make articles unreliable. But the "semi-automated tools for 'content protection'" concerns me. I don't know what a semi-automated tool would be, in this context. Do you mean something like Pending Changes/Flagged Revisions? Or a Twinkle-type gadget? The latter would help with vandalism, including outright spam, but not so much with "thinly veiled commercial promotion". As for the former, it may be inevitable eventually, but I can't say I want to have much do with it in any incarnation I've seen to date (and the issues it raises aren't limited to a lack of technical sophistication). In either case, I'm not sure how a WikiProject is going to go about encouraging the creation of such technologically-based solutions. Even if we're just talking bots, those are created by people who have the skills and the time and who are interested in that sort of thing. So I guess I'd just get rid of Item 7 for the moment. I don't see why anything need replace it.<p>I'm conflicted about Item 6. No one could reasonably argue with its first sentence, but the second sentence is quite debatable. Unless we're quite sure that a decade of article-writing has filled all the significant gaps, we shouldn't be emphasizing the improvement of existing articles over the creation of new ones. I, for one, am not at all sure. Although nearly all of the "low-hanging fruit" may have been picked by now, I'm not persuaded that there aren't significant gaps yet. Fwiw, I still not infrequently encounter nonexistent articles when I come here to look something up. Sometimes they've been deleted—perhaps wrongly—and sometimes they're redirects that deserve their own articles and sometimes they're just not here at all and never were. And I'm just not sure that filling those gaps isn't of the highest importance.<p>Consider also that while plenty of editors are flexible and can contribute in different ways, others are not and cannot. For instance, some editors are better at creating something from scratch but get really bored or inept when faced with the task of molding and polishing something beyond its fledgling stages. By the same token, others thrive on sourcing content, rewriting text, finding and arranging graphics, adding infoboxes and the like but couldn't write a passable stub to save their life. No amount of cajoling or coercion will turn one kind of editor into the other kind. Editors with enough self-insight will realize where their strengths and weaknesses lie, but others will make futile efforts to conform to community standards and wind up in situations where their incompetence gets them into trouble. Bottom line for me on this one: while I support placing certain limits on article creation, I don't want to discourage any competent editor from writing a new article. Ever.<p>Specifics aside, I guess I might as well ask you in very general terms: why exactly do you think your project is a good idea? What would your project supply that is lacking in the WP community currently? [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 07:20, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

536903 +++$+++ Adkagansu +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-26 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.143383520E09 +++$+++ Now I'll assume you have good faith and expect you will put these into consideration before threatening me for breaking rules, just because someone told you so. Good day.-- +++$+++ Now I'll assume you have good faith and expect you will put these into consideration before threatening me for breaking rules, just because someone told you so. Good day.--[[User:Adkagansu|Kagan the Barbarian]] 06:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
536904 +++$+++ Adkagansu +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536903 +++$+++ 536903 +++$+++ 2006-03-26 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.143428760E09 +++$+++ Good for you.-- +++$+++ :Good for you.--[[User:Adkagansu|Kagan the Barbarian]] 19:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

274760 +++$+++ Shot info +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274760 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-14 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.216046760E09 +++$+++ On an aside - there is something similar occuring with a {{userlinks|Davkal}} in the Altmed area of WP. If you find a solution to PJ, then we would appreciate a heads up to implement something similar with Davkal.  Thanks  +++$+++ On an aside - there is something similar occuring with a {{userlinks|Davkal}} in the Altmed area of WP. If you find a solution to PJ, then we would appreciate a heads up to implement something similar with Davkal.  Thanks [[User:Shot info|Shot info]] ([[User talk:Shot info|talk]]) 07:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
274761 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274760 +++$+++ 274760 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.216051380E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately I don't think there is any solution other than block and revert.  +++$+++ :Unfortunately I don't think there is any solution other than block and revert. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:03, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

274762 +++$+++ Matilda +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274762 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-16 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.216215240E09 +++$+++ I am not sure why you blocked {{userlinks|I Wake Up Screaming }} as a scokpuppet.  I didn't see an obvious pattern of edits that confirmed him as a sockpuppet but I am not familiar with all his topics of interest. -- +++$+++ I am not sure why you blocked {{userlinks|I Wake Up Screaming }} as a scokpuppet.  I didn't see an obvious pattern of edits that confirmed him as a sockpuppet but I am not familiar with all his topics of interest. --[[User:Matilda|Matilda]] <sup>[[User_talk:Matilda|talk]]</sup> 06:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
274763 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274762 +++$+++ 274762 +++$+++ 2008-07-16 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.216216380E09 +++$+++ Well, it was one that Dan identified at RFCU as a CU suggestion and I discussed the results of that CU privately with OIC as the results were suggested accounts to look at, rather than probable\/possible\/etc and we both felt that the edit summaries in particular and the subject areas (PJ also edited [[Energy policy of Australia]] and some related pages) looked like PJ. However, if you think it's an error you're welcome to unblock it.  +++$+++ :Well, it was one that Dan identified at RFCU as a CU suggestion and I discussed the results of that CU privately with OIC as the results were suggested accounts to look at, rather than probable/possible/etc and we both felt that the edit summaries in particular and the subject areas (PJ also edited [[Energy policy of Australia]] and some related pages) looked like PJ. However, if you think it's an error you're welcome to unblock it. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
274764 +++$+++ Matilda +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274762 +++$+++ 274763 +++$+++ 2008-07-16 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.216218480E09 +++$+++ The user hasn't objected and I just wanted to check there was a reason.  I feel as though there is some hysteria going on - perhaps it is justified and I certianly will block at first sight anyone who starts reverting Lester or Merbubu as has been the recent PJ sockpuppet pattern but I am concerned that others may be being identified as sockpuppets with insufficient justification - for example {{user|Seendcleeve}} - and there may indeed be justification for him I just don't know.  This user didn't seem to be reverting Lester or anyone else so I couldn't see why he had been identified.  I am not familiar enough with PJ's editing pattern but if others think it matches then I am OK with that.  A question has arisen though on the [[Category talk:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Prester John|checkuser talk page]] as to an article that that user created  with a request that it be deleted.  Others have since edited the article so I think deletion a bit yucky. Regards -- +++$+++ ::The user hasn't objected and I just wanted to check there was a reason.  I feel as though there is some hysteria going on - perhaps it is justified and I certianly will block at first sight anyone who starts reverting Lester or Merbubu as has been the recent PJ sockpuppet pattern but I am concerned that others may be being identified as sockpuppets with insufficient justification - for example {{user|Seendcleeve}} - and there may indeed be justification for him I just don't know.  This user didn't seem to be reverting Lester or anyone else so I couldn't see why he had been identified.  I am not familiar enough with PJ's editing pattern but if others think it matches then I am OK with that.  A question has arisen though on the [[Category talk:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Prester John|checkuser talk page]] as to an article that that user created  with a request that it be deleted.  Others have since edited the article so I think deletion a bit yucky. Regards --[[User:Matilda|Matilda]] <sup>[[User_talk:Matilda|talk]]</sup> 07:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

395319 +++$+++ SQL +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ 395319 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.310553540E09 +++$+++ Hi old friend! Would you mind unprotecting my user\/talkpages please?  +++$+++ Hi old friend! Would you mind unprotecting my user/talkpages please? [[User:SQL|<span style="font-size:7pt;color: #fff;background:#900;border:2px solid #999">SQL</span>]][[User talk:SQL|<sup style="font-size: 5pt;color:#999">Query me!</sup>]] 03:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
395320 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ 395319 +++$+++ 395319 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310553720E09 +++$+++ Hey! I didn't know you were editing again. I'm no longer an admin here, but it looks like [[User:Risker|Risker]] just got those pages for you (thanks, Risker!). [[WP:BN]] if you want admin rights back. Welcome back? :-)  -- +++$+++ : Hey! I didn't know you were editing again. I'm no longer an admin here, but it looks like [[User:Risker|Risker]] just got those pages for you (thanks, Risker!). [[WP:BN]] if you want admin rights back. Welcome back? :-)  --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride#top|talk]]) 03:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
395321 +++$+++ SQL +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ 395319 +++$+++ 395320 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.310553900E09 +++$+++ Ya, 2 days ago I found myself [[Unemployed|with extra free time on my hands]]. Without the 80 hour a week job, I can do things again! Also, I had no idea you weren't an admin anymore. Now, off to find an article to <s>mangle<\/s> improve.  +++$+++ :: Ya, 2 days ago I found myself [[Unemployed|with extra free time on my hands]]. Without the 80 hour a week job, I can do things again! Also, I had no idea you weren't an admin anymore. Now, off to find an article to <s>mangle</s> improve. [[User:SQL|<span style="font-size:7pt;color: #fff;background:#900;border:2px solid #999">SQL</span>]][[User talk:SQL|<sup style="font-size: 5pt;color:#999">Query me!</sup>]] 03:45, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

12621 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-01 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.304279160E09 +++$+++ I have started to think about your items, and that resulted in some useful items that will help others in general,e.g. two new pages on reliability tools, if you look on the project page. I will do more fixes then respond, but your comments already helped clarify some items. I will do more, then come back in a day or two.  +++$+++ I have started to think about your items, and that resulted in some useful items that will help others in general,e.g. two new pages on reliability tools, if you look on the project page. I will do more fixes then respond, but your comments already helped clarify some items. I will do more, then come back in a day or two. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 12:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
12622 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12621 +++$+++ 12621 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.304296980E09 +++$+++ Sounds good! I'll look forward to seeing that.  +++$+++ :Sounds good! I'll look forward to seeing that. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 17:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
12623 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12621 +++$+++ 12622 +++$+++ 2011-05-05 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.304583360E09 +++$+++ FYI: [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Wiki-Watch]] should go on the front page in a week or two, then reliability will get some attention. I am yet to expand the project items but will do so in a day or two.  +++$+++ ::FYI: [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Wiki-Watch]] should go on the front page in a week or two, then reliability will get some attention. I am yet to expand the project items but will do so in a day or two. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 01:16, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
12624 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12621 +++$+++ 12623 +++$+++ 2011-05-06 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.304686620E09 +++$+++ Noted.  +++$+++ :::Noted. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 05:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

274766 +++$+++ Lester +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-22 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.216718880E09 +++$+++ Request the [[George Colbran]] article be reinstated, as it was actively being discussed, and actively being modified at the time of the deletion.--''' +++$+++ Request the [[George Colbran]] article be reinstated, as it was actively being discussed, and actively being modified at the time of the deletion.--'''[[User:Lester|<span style="color:green">Lester</span>]]''' 02:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
274767 +++$+++ Timeshift9 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274766 +++$+++ 274766 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.216719060E09 +++$+++ Enough discussion was entered in to. I'm sorry but he is not noteable.  +++$+++ :Enough discussion was entered in to. I'm sorry but he is not noteable. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 02:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

12625 +++$+++ Kgenereux +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-08 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.304901960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for listening!!!  +++$+++ Thanks for listening!!! [[User:Kgenereux|Kgenereux]] ([[User talk:Kgenereux|talk]]) 17:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
12626 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12625 +++$+++ 12625 +++$+++ 2011-05-08 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.304903820E09 +++$+++ Hm, yes. Well, Russell's article is on my watchlist only because I reverted vandalism or something like that. I'm aware of who he is, his recent comeback via Elton John, and the fact that he was very well known in the '70s, but I don't pretend to know much about him. I I actually haven't done more than skim the article so far. (So many tasks to do here, so little time.) Yes, footnotes are sorted automatically: once the reflinks are set up on a page (which they already are at [[Leon Russell]]), inserting the source information between the tags <nowiki><ref> and <\/ref><\/nowiki> will place the citation in the references section and number it. Honestly, citations are one of the more complex things to get right on Wikipedia, and no one's going to jump on you if you screw it up. (They ''might'' revert you. Preferably, they'll just fix it.) I'm just online for a few minutes now, but I'll try to take a detailed look at the article over the next day or so. <p>Incidentally, your background in writing music reviews could be ''very'' helpful to Wikipedia. Don't worry about your writing style. If you go over the top, someone invariably will let you know. There is a tendency around here for article text to be flat and boring. In my view, that is an unfortunate side effect of the policies requiring that content be neutrally worded, verifiable, and free of original research. It's actually possible to honor those policies and still write lively prose, but it's a fine balance sometimes.  +++$+++ :Hm, yes. Well, Russell's article is on my watchlist only because I reverted vandalism or something like that. I'm aware of who he is, his recent comeback via Elton John, and the fact that he was very well known in the '70s, but I don't pretend to know much about him. I I actually haven't done more than skim the article so far. (So many tasks to do here, so little time.) Yes, footnotes are sorted automatically: once the reflinks are set up on a page (which they already are at [[Leon Russell]]), inserting the source information between the tags <nowiki><ref> and </ref></nowiki> will place the citation in the references section and number it. Honestly, citations are one of the more complex things to get right on Wikipedia, and no one's going to jump on you if you screw it up. (They ''might'' revert you. Preferably, they'll just fix it.) I'm just online for a few minutes now, but I'll try to take a detailed look at the article over the next day or so. <p>Incidentally, your background in writing music reviews could be ''very'' helpful to Wikipedia. Don't worry about your writing style. If you go over the top, someone invariably will let you know. There is a tendency around here for article text to be flat and boring. In my view, that is an unfortunate side effect of the policies requiring that content be neutrally worded, verifiable, and free of original research. It's actually possible to honor those policies and still write lively prose, but it's a fine balance sometimes. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 18:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

12627 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12627 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-09 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.305001920E09 +++$+++ regards -- +++$+++ regards --[[User:FaktneviM|FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 21:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
12628 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12627 +++$+++ 12627 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.305012240E09 +++$+++ Aside from the errors in spelling and capitalization (which I would have fixed), the grammar and syntax were bizarre enough that I couldn't be sure what you meant, so I just reverted. \"Consider\" is a transitive verb; you can't \"consider ''to''\" something. But removing the preposition leaves us with \"which they consider only Almighty God\", which doesn't make any sense, either. In the other phrase, what exactly is a \"born-created Son\"? It has no clear meaning in English. Your explication above (why is it numbered?) isn't very helpful, I'm afraid. In any case, I have no particular interest in the article or the topic; I was there only as a copyeditor.<p>Incidentally, I see that someone has left a comment on your talk page regarding your difficulties in using standard English. May I suggest that one solution might be for you to post your proposed edits on a given article's talk page? That would allow you to explain what you mean and for the wording to be cleaned up before it goes into the article. Personally, I value diversity among Wikipedia editors, but I suspect your proficiency in English is not yet sufficient for the types of edits you've been making. Articles must be clearly written in standard English. Good luck!  +++$+++ :Aside from the errors in spelling and capitalization (which I would have fixed), the grammar and syntax were bizarre enough that I couldn't be sure what you meant, so I just reverted. "Consider" is a transitive verb; you can't "consider ''to''" something. But removing the preposition leaves us with "which they consider only Almighty God", which doesn't make any sense, either. In the other phrase, what exactly is a "born-created Son"? It has no clear meaning in English. Your explication above (why is it numbered?) isn't very helpful, I'm afraid. In any case, I have no particular interest in the article or the topic; I was there only as a copyeditor.<p>Incidentally, I see that someone has left a comment on your talk page regarding your difficulties in using standard English. May I suggest that one solution might be for you to post your proposed edits on a given article's talk page? That would allow you to explain what you mean and for the wording to be cleaned up before it goes into the article. Personally, I value diversity among Wikipedia editors, but I suspect your proficiency in English is not yet sufficient for the types of edits you've been making. Articles must be clearly written in standard English. Good luck! [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 00:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
12629 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12627 +++$+++ 12628 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.305040740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for help. -- +++$+++ :: Thanks for help. --[[User:FaktneviM|FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 08:19, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
12630 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12627 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.305114660E09 +++$+++ I have been considerably more patient with you than I'd expect anyone to be with me if I were to bumble onto a foreign-language Wikipedia and call its editors lazy because they didn't take time to contemplate my garbled claims. My [[WP:AGF|good faith]] is fast approaching its limit, so I hope you'll take my sincere well wishes with you as you move on to other areas of the project. It's a [[Wikipedia#Language_editions|vast world]] out there. Sorry I couldn't be of help.  +++$+++ :::::I have been considerably more patient with you than I'd expect anyone to be with me if I were to bumble onto a foreign-language Wikipedia and call its editors lazy because they didn't take time to contemplate my garbled claims. My [[WP:AGF|good faith]] is fast approaching its limit, so I hope you'll take my sincere well wishes with you as you move on to other areas of the project. It's a [[Wikipedia#Language_editions|vast world]] out there. Sorry I couldn't be of help. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 04:51, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
12631 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12627 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.305120840E09 +++$+++ Well. I have no throw to this debate too. Never mind. I appriciate Your driving motives and make no question of your advices, which could help me in future.  Despite generalizations of other editors seem to be unfair, critical point of statistics is clear. For many years, for several different topics, I had no fluke to encounter unlazy+unlofty+helpful editor. Perhaps my development will reassume and look forward optimistically, because lot of problems is on my side. Hopefuly this agonized talk right now will not relevant for our potential tomorrow. Best regards -- +++$+++ ::::::Well. I have no throw to this debate too. Never mind. I appriciate Your driving motives and make no question of your advices, which could help me in future.  Despite generalizations of other editors seem to be unfair, critical point of statistics is clear. For many years, for several different topics, I had no fluke to encounter unlazy+unlofty+helpful editor. Perhaps my development will reassume and look forward optimistically, because lot of problems is on my side. Hopefuly this agonized talk right now will not relevant for our potential tomorrow. Best regards --[[User:FaktneviM|FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 06:34, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

274773 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-23 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.216828380E09 +++$+++ Was both speedied and deleted by some considerate eds yesterday - I need a copy as there was hardly a time to spit the dummy (no one helps out at the Indonesian project for maintenance anymore) so its basically open game for the deletionsists who have a very limited understanding of the Indonesian project and its whizzy editors :( - I need a copy of the article to reinstate it as I have hardly time to scratch mysefl let alone find refs to chase the xxx's away - cheers  +++$+++ Was both speedied and deleted by some considerate eds yesterday - I need a copy as there was hardly a time to spit the dummy (no one helps out at the Indonesian project for maintenance anymore) so its basically open game for the deletionsists who have a very limited understanding of the Indonesian project and its whizzy editors :( - I need a copy of the article to reinstate it as I have hardly time to scratch mysefl let alone find refs to chase the xxx's away - cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 08:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
274774 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274773 +++$+++ 274773 +++$+++ 2008-07-23 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.216837620E09 +++$+++ Okay, let me have a look... +++$+++ :Okay, let me have a look...[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
274775 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274773 +++$+++ 274773 +++$+++ 2008-07-23 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.216837800E09 +++$+++ Sent to you, Sats.  +++$+++ :Sent to you, Sats. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

12632 +++$+++ Joe Decker +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-11 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.305116580E09 +++$+++ Reverted you on the Pending changes discussion page with an accidental rollback click, undid it, but I thought I'd drop you a line to let you know it was just a finger-fumble.  Sorry 'bout that.  Best,  -- +++$+++ Reverted you on the Pending changes discussion page with an accidental rollback click, undid it, but I thought I'd drop you a line to let you know it was just a finger-fumble.  Sorry 'bout that.  Best,  --[[User:Joe Decker|joe decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|<sup><small><i>talk to me</i></small></sup>]] 05:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
12633 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12632 +++$+++ 12632 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.305116820E09 +++$+++ Delete the main page lately?  ;)  Seriously, thanks for the heads-up. I've done worse!  +++$+++ :Delete the main page lately?  ;)  Seriously, thanks for the heads-up. I've done worse! [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 05:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
12634 +++$+++ Joe Decker +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12632 +++$+++ 12633 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.305120840E09 +++$+++ *grin*  Nope, nor blocked Jimbo... yet.  ;-)  -- +++$+++ :: *grin*  Nope, nor blocked Jimbo... yet.  ;-)  --[[User:Joe Decker|joe decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|<sup><small><i>talk to me</i></small></sup>]] 06:34, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

12635 +++$+++ Dnik +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-14 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.305416280E09 +++$+++ Br,  +++$+++ Br, [[User:Dnik|dnik]] [[User talk:Dnik|►]] 16:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
12636 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.305417120E09 +++$+++ No harm done. Thanks for letting me know. Usually, when I see something I don't understand at all, it's because I'm being clueless.  +++$+++ :No harm done. Thanks for letting me know. Usually, when I see something I don't understand at all, it's because I'm being clueless. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 16:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
12637 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.305417360E09 +++$+++ Btw, regarding the associated article, are you up on notability requirements for backing bands? I noticed that Spyboy and The Nash Ramblers (and The Hot Band) don't have articles, and I was wondering if they should. (Sourcing would be a big job, especially for The Hot Band, I suspect.)   +++$+++ :Btw, regarding the associated article, are you up on notability requirements for backing bands? I noticed that Spyboy and The Nash Ramblers (and The Hot Band) don't have articles, and I was wondering if they should. (Sourcing would be a big job, especially for The Hot Band, I suspect.)  [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 16:56, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
12638 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ 2011-05-19 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.305852840E09 +++$+++ Well, let's see. The [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=James_Michel&action=historysubmit&diff=429694751&oldid=428450494 first of your two edits] to the article changed the infobox to suggest that the President Michel had married his secretary. If that was true, it was incumbent upon you to provide a credible source to back it up. If it wasn't true, then it was an act of [[WP:Vandalism|vandalism]] that violated Wikipedia's [[WP:BLP|policy on biographical content]]. Giving you the benefit of the doubt, I actually spent 2\u20133 minutes checking and drew a blank.<p>Your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=James_Michel&action=historysubmit&diff=429696560&oldid=429695786 second edit]\u2014also unsourced\u2014reported the results of an election in colorfully [[WP:NPOV|POV]] terms and alleged bribery on the part of the defeated incumbent. But wait\u2014it seems [http:\/\/af.reuters.com\/article\/topNews\/idAFJOE74I0UQ20110519 the election hadn't even happened yet] when you made the edit. So you deliberately inserted non-factual content based on wishful thinking into an encyclopedia article that is supposed to be limited to [[WP:V|verifiable fact]]. That is vandalism, and unequivocally so. You have acted in bad faith and destroyed your own credibility.<p>[[WP:ISNOT|Wikipedia is not]] a tool for influencing elections, nor is it your own personal soapbox. I urge you to limit any further activity at Wikipedia to [[WP:RS|sourced]] edits that may be easily verified; otherwise, your tenure here is [[WP:Blocking|likely to be short]].  +++$+++ :Well, let's see. The [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Michel&action=historysubmit&diff=429694751&oldid=428450494 first of your two edits] to the article changed the infobox to suggest that the President Michel had married his secretary. If that was true, it was incumbent upon you to provide a credible source to back it up. If it wasn't true, then it was an act of [[WP:Vandalism|vandalism]] that violated Wikipedia's [[WP:BLP|policy on biographical content]]. Giving you the benefit of the doubt, I actually spent 2–3 minutes checking and drew a blank.<p>Your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Michel&action=historysubmit&diff=429696560&oldid=429695786 second edit]—also unsourced—reported the results of an election in colorfully [[WP:NPOV|POV]] terms and alleged bribery on the part of the defeated incumbent. But wait—it seems [http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE74I0UQ20110519 the election hadn't even happened yet] when you made the edit. So you deliberately inserted non-factual content based on wishful thinking into an encyclopedia article that is supposed to be limited to [[WP:V|verifiable fact]]. That is vandalism, and unequivocally so. You have acted in bad faith and destroyed your own credibility.<p>[[WP:ISNOT|Wikipedia is not]] a tool for influencing elections, nor is it your own personal soapbox. I urge you to limit any further activity at Wikipedia to [[WP:RS|sourced]] edits that may be easily verified; otherwise, your tenure here is [[WP:Blocking|likely to be short]]. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 17:54, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
12639 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.306842060E09 +++$+++ I have absolutely no idea who you are or what you're talking about, but I'll see if I can figure it out and respond later.  +++$+++ :I have absolutely no idea who you are or what you're talking about, but I'll see if I can figure it out and respond later. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 04:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
12640 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.306844460E09 +++$+++ Ah. Well, I hadn't got around to checking yet, but thanks for the heads-up. (Long time no see, btw!)  +++$+++ :::Ah. Well, I hadn't got around to checking yet, but thanks for the heads-up. (Long time no see, btw!) [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 05:21, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
12641 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.306847040E09 +++$+++ <small>[cough, wheeze, flick Bic, edit conflict] <\/small>I saw your name in Recent Changes one day recently, so I knew you weren't ''gone'' gone. But the plot thickens: not only have I never edited [[Talk:Post-traumatic_embitterment_disorder|this crapmess]] or its associated article; I have never edited ''any'' page that [[Special:Contributions\/108.7.207.224|108.7.207.224]] has ever edited. <small>[fade in ''Twilight Zone'' music]<\/small> Which is all very well\u2014mistakes do happen (I once almost reverted Jimbo when I inadvertently clicked on the wrong tab)\u2014but I can't understand how this one might have happened. If our edit histories have never intersected, it's downright odd.  +++$+++ :::::<small>[cough, wheeze, flick Bic, edit conflict] </small>I saw your name in Recent Changes one day recently, so I knew you weren't ''gone'' gone. But the plot thickens: not only have I never edited [[Talk:Post-traumatic_embitterment_disorder|this crapmess]] or its associated article; I have never edited ''any'' page that [[Special:Contributions/108.7.207.224|108.7.207.224]] has ever edited. <small>[fade in ''Twilight Zone'' music]</small> Which is all very well—mistakes do happen (I once almost reverted Jimbo when I inadvertently clicked on the wrong tab)—but I can't understand how this one might have happened. If our edit histories have never intersected, it's downright odd. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 06:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
12642 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.306847340E09 +++$+++ Um, pardon my denseness . . . it's a nice-\"sounding\" (ahem) pun, but I actually don't get it.  +++$+++ :::::Um, pardon my denseness . . . it's a nice-"sounding" (ahem) pun, but I actually don't get it. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 06:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
12643 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ 12635 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.306854720E09 +++$+++ Since I don't see any plausible way an IP I've never intersected with ended up on my talk page, I'll have to accept your first hypothesis. (Please let my new reality be more real than my old reality, with little or no unreality and only sporadic episodes of surreality.) Although their comment ''did'' sound like the sort of comment I'm prone to getting, which made me wonder if someone was having a little fun. (To IP 108.7.207.224: Thank you. I love a mystery!) As for marine mammals, I overthought it. Did you get the [[wiktionary:sound#Verb_2|sound]] part, though? ;)  +++$+++ :Since I don't see any plausible way an IP I've never intersected with ended up on my talk page, I'll have to accept your first hypothesis. (Please let my new reality be more real than my old reality, with little or no unreality and only sporadic episodes of surreality.) Although their comment ''did'' sound like the sort of comment I'm prone to getting, which made me wonder if someone was having a little fun. (To IP 108.7.207.224: Thank you. I love a mystery!) As for marine mammals, I overthought it. Did you get the [[wiktionary:sound#Verb_2|sound]] part, though? ;) [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 08:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

274780 +++$+++ Vassyana +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274780 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-31 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.217497140E09 +++$+++ Could you fill me in on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Mediation_Cabal&curid=1860656&diff=228801461&oldid=228732486 this]? Please feel free to email me if private correspondence is desired or necessary.  +++$+++ Could you fill me in on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Mediation_Cabal&curid=1860656&diff=228801461&oldid=228732486 this]? Please feel free to email me if private correspondence is desired or necessary. [[User:Vassyana|Vassyana]] ([[User talk:Vassyana|talk]]) 02:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
274781 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274780 +++$+++ 274780 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.217497500E09 +++$+++ It's [[User:Premier]] who has been a long-term disruption of indigenous Australian pages and most recently reincarnated as [[User:Steakknife]] and then when that sock was blocked he immediately reappeared as  +++$+++ :It's [[User:Premier]] who has been a long-term disruption of indigenous Australian pages and most recently reincarnated as [[User:Steakknife]] and then when that sock was blocked he immediately reappeared as [[User:PWBotha]]. The other night he was edit warring over the Indig Australians page and kept adding "Nigger" into the article. When his various socks were blocked he returned as that IP, an IP he has been known to use previously. If you want more info, you might contact [[User talk:Orderinchaos]] who has dealt with more of his socks than I have. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

274782 +++$+++ Porqin +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274782 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-31 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.217533980E09 +++$+++ Hello, just letting you know that you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:MUFC1000&oldid=226439356 welcomed] [[User:MUFC1000]] after making only a single [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image:Chislehurst_and_sidcup_grammar.gif&diff=226867626&oldid=173292065 test edit]. Thanks! -- +++$+++ Hello, just letting you know that you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MUFC1000&oldid=226439356 welcomed] [[User:MUFC1000]] after making only a single [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Chislehurst_and_sidcup_grammar.gif&diff=226867626&oldid=173292065 test edit]. Thanks! --[[User:Porqin|Porqin]] ([[User talk:Porqin|talk]]) 12:53, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
274783 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274782 +++$+++ 274782 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.217535060E09 +++$+++ Hey there Porqin, thanks for your message. Actually, you might notice that I welcomed that user three days before they made that edit. This is because I'm a moderator of unblock-en-l@wikimedia.org and I created their account for them. (see the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=Sarah&page=User%3AMUFC1000&year=&month=-1 account creation log]) It is quite standard to welcome people whose account you create, in fact there is even a bot that does this for you if you work on [[WP:ACC]]. FWIW, I'm pretty sure that edit would have been a mistake rather than anything malicious.  +++$+++ :Hey there Porqin, thanks for your message. Actually, you might notice that I welcomed that user three days before they made that edit. This is because I'm a moderator of unblock-en-l@wikimedia.org and I created their account for them. (see the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=Sarah&page=User%3AMUFC1000&year=&month=-1 account creation log]) It is quite standard to welcome people whose account you create, in fact there is even a bot that does this for you if you work on [[WP:ACC]]. FWIW, I'm pretty sure that edit would have been a mistake rather than anything malicious. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
274784 +++$+++ Porqin +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274782 +++$+++ 274783 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.217535600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply. I now see that you welcomed them beforehand. I too agree that they didn't intentionally try to vandalize Wikipedia, but making them aware of their edit (being only one) will hopefully prevent mistakes from happening in the future. Thanks again! -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for your reply. I now see that you welcomed them beforehand. I too agree that they didn't intentionally try to vandalize Wikipedia, but making them aware of their edit (being only one) will hopefully prevent mistakes from happening in the future. Thanks again! --[[User:Porqin|Porqin]] ([[User talk:Porqin|talk]]) 13:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

274787 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-07 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.218095460E09 +++$+++ You will notice that I have restored myself to the recall category.  [[User:Jehochman\/Dispute resolution|My criteria page]] has been online since January,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Jehochman\/Dispute_resolution&oldid=186112149] but I was unsure about it, so I was not \"advertising\".  +++$+++ You will notice that I have restored myself to the recall category.  [[User:Jehochman/Dispute resolution|My criteria page]] has been online since January,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jehochman/Dispute_resolution&oldid=186112149] but I was unsure about it, so I was not "advertising". [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 00:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
274788 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274787 +++$+++ 274787 +++$+++ 2008-08-07 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.218096540E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but I don't really want you to be in the category unless you really want to be in it. I just didn't think it was fair to assume that Elonka's criteria hadn't changed since her RfA when you yourself had changed your own. I don't like recall myself because I think it is too prone to drama and misuse and I can't imagine ever adding myself to the category so I would not hold it against anyone if they changed their mind about it. I don't want to fight with you Jonathan and I'm sorry if I have said things that have been hurtful or felt like personal attacks as that has not been my intention at all. I'm just very concerned about what has been happening.  +++$+++ :Thanks, but I don't really want you to be in the category unless you really want to be in it. I just didn't think it was fair to assume that Elonka's criteria hadn't changed since her RfA when you yourself had changed your own. I don't like recall myself because I think it is too prone to drama and misuse and I can't imagine ever adding myself to the category so I would not hold it against anyone if they changed their mind about it. I don't want to fight with you Jonathan and I'm sorry if I have said things that have been hurtful or felt like personal attacks as that has not been my intention at all. I'm just very concerned about what has been happening. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
274789 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274787 +++$+++ 274788 +++$+++ 2008-08-07 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.218096720E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'm in for now.  Don't worry, you can say whatever you want to me.  I'd rather hear it and have a chance to reply.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. I'm in for now.  Don't worry, you can say whatever you want to me.  I'd rather hear it and have a chance to reply. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 01:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
274790 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274787 +++$+++ 274789 +++$+++ 2008-08-07 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.218141600E09 +++$+++ This probably was not intentional on your part, but it is rude to talk about somebody in a forum where they can't respond.  I left a note for you at Elonka's talk page requesting that you move the entire conversation elsewhere.  Thank you.  +++$+++ :::This probably was not intentional on your part, but it is rude to talk about somebody in a forum where they can't respond.  I left a note for you at Elonka's talk page requesting that you move the entire conversation elsewhere.  Thank you. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 13:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
274791 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274787 +++$+++ 274790 +++$+++ 2008-08-07 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.218151500E09 +++$+++ Sorry but I'm not going to move or refactor my posts. I feel what I have said there is very relevant to the discussion so I shall be leaving everything as it stands though I don't really have any intention of pursuing things further there unless I have to. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::::Sorry but I'm not going to move or refactor my posts. I feel what I have said there is very relevant to the discussion so I shall be leaving everything as it stands though I don't really have any intention of pursuing things further there unless I have to. Thanks. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 16:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

12644 +++$+++ Meneerke bloem +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12644 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-04 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.307206680E09 +++$+++ Many thanks, -- +++$+++ Many thanks, --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 09:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
12645 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12644 +++$+++ 12644 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.307237640E09 +++$+++ I'd be glad to. My schedule is a bit challenging today, but I'll take a look sometime within the next 24 hours.  +++$+++ :I'd be glad to. My schedule is a bit challenging today, but I'll take a look sometime within the next 24 hours. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 18:34, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
12646 +++$+++ Meneerke bloem +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12644 +++$+++ 12645 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.307240280E09 +++$+++ Thank you in advance for your appreciated help. -- +++$+++ ::Thank you in advance for your appreciated help. --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 19:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

12647 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-05 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.307285400E09 +++$+++ A couple more question: those names separated by commas in the infobox\u2014that's his full name? Also, I wonder if the \"(author)\" disambiguation is needed in the article's title.  +++$+++ A couple more question: those names separated by commas in the infobox—that's his full name? Also, I wonder if the "(author)" disambiguation is needed in the article's title. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 07:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
12648 +++$+++ Meneerke bloem +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12647 +++$+++ 12647 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.307295900E09 +++$+++ With my renewed thanks for your help, -- +++$+++ :With my renewed thanks for your help, --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 10:45, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
12649 +++$+++ Meneerke bloem +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12647 +++$+++ 12648 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.307298240E09 +++$+++ Why \"Ivo Pauwels (author)\"? '''Answer:''' In Flanders there are two well known persons with the name \"Ivo Pauwels\", my friend \"Author\" - see [[:nl:Ivo Pauwels (auteur)]] and an \"Actor\" - see [[:nl:Ivo Pauwels (acteur)]]. -- +++$+++ :: Why "Ivo Pauwels (author)"? '''Answer:''' In Flanders there are two well known persons with the name "Ivo Pauwels", my friend "Author" - see [[:nl:Ivo Pauwels (auteur)]] and an "Actor" - see [[:nl:Ivo Pauwels (acteur)]]. --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 11:24, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
12650 +++$+++ Meneerke bloem +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12647 +++$+++ 12648 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.307298600E09 +++$+++ '''PS:''' Those names separated by commas in the infobox \u2014 that's indeed his full name. I have removed the commas. -- +++$+++ ::'''PS:''' Those names separated by commas in the infobox — that's indeed his full name. I have removed the commas. --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 11:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
12651 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12647 +++$+++ 12650 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.307321880E09 +++$+++ I am not proficient in IPA and have little idea of Flemish pronunciation. There's probably a WikiProject or centralized noticeboard for IPA requests. I really don't know but I'll see if I can find it later.  +++$+++ :::I am not proficient in IPA and have little idea of Flemish pronunciation. There's probably a WikiProject or centralized noticeboard for IPA requests. I really don't know but I'll see if I can find it later. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 17:58, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
12652 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12647 +++$+++ 12650 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.307364720E09 +++$+++ Forgot to mention that translated pages may need attribution. I see from the history that you're the only editor who has made any substantive contributions to the Dutch-language article, but to be on the safe side I'm placing a translation template on the talk page (of the English article). You may also want to note in an edit summary to the English article that it's a translation from nl.wp (see [[Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia]]).  +++$+++ :::Forgot to mention that translated pages may need attribution. I see from the history that you're the only editor who has made any substantive contributions to the Dutch-language article, but to be on the safe side I'm placing a translation template on the talk page (of the English article). You may also want to note in an edit summary to the English article that it's a translation from nl.wp (see [[Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia]]). [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 05:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

274792 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-11 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.218491520E09 +++$+++ Could you review this harassment case involving {{admin|Fritzpoll}}.  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Abd#Warning_before_block] Thanks.  +++$+++ Could you review this harassment case involving {{admin|Fritzpoll}}.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Abd#Warning_before_block] Thanks. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 14:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
274793 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274792 +++$+++ 274792 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.218502740E09 +++$+++ Sorry, it took me a while to review that properly. That's appalling. I think the way he is behaving in general, going from page to page lecturing people, and specifically towards Fritzpoll is disgraceful and I'm quite prepared to block him myself or support a block.  +++$+++ :Sorry, it took me a while to review that properly. That's appalling. I think the way he is behaving in general, going from page to page lecturing people, and specifically towards Fritzpoll is disgraceful and I'm quite prepared to block him myself or support a block. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 17:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
274794 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274792 +++$+++ 274793 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.218502860E09 +++$+++ Hold fire for a little while, but do keep an eye on the page(s).  Carcharoth wants a chance to talk to Abd, and thinks he\/she may be able to resolve the problem without a block.   +++$+++ ::Hold fire for a little while, but do keep an eye on the page(s).  Carcharoth wants a chance to talk to Abd, and thinks he/she may be able to resolve the problem without a block.  [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 18:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

274795 +++$+++ Lester +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-10 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.218393600E09 +++$+++ Sarah, I wish to protest about your locking of the Howard article, and the blocking of user:MickMacNee who was only one party in the ensuing edit war. The locking of the article is not appropriate when there are only 2 parties involved in this current edit war. Also, you have only blocked one of the waring parties, whilst showing leniancy to the other party whom you have had a long history of agreeing with on content matters concerning [[John Howard]] over the past year. You are as involved in the content of that article as anyone else, and there needs to be more of a separation between administrive decisions and content. --''' +++$+++ Sarah, I wish to protest about your locking of the Howard article, and the blocking of user:MickMacNee who was only one party in the ensuing edit war. The locking of the article is not appropriate when there are only 2 parties involved in this current edit war. Also, you have only blocked one of the waring parties, whilst showing leniancy to the other party whom you have had a long history of agreeing with on content matters concerning [[John Howard]] over the past year. You are as involved in the content of that article as anyone else, and there needs to be more of a separation between administrive decisions and content. --'''[[User:Lester|<span style="color:green">Lester</span>]]''' 11:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
274796 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 2008-08-10 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.218394380E09 +++$+++ I think it is appropriate. As Gnangarra said on the talk page, this is the third edit war in the last week or so. Enough now. MickMacNee violated 3RR, reverting four times against two different users, a block was appropriate. Peter did not revert four times and I've disagreed with him many times on many subjects and I supported and helped with enforcement of his arbitration sanctions when he was banned. I really find your \"suggestions\" about me offensive, Lester. You lot can go and sort out whatever you want in or out on the talk page first. I'm as involved with the content as anyone else? That's just rubbish. I haven't edited the article since last year! And other than commenting on you using of the talk page to co-ordinate a user RFC a few months ago I don't think I've been on talk page for months either. That's not \"involved\". +++$+++ :I think it is appropriate. As Gnangarra said on the talk page, this is the third edit war in the last week or so. Enough now. MickMacNee violated 3RR, reverting four times against two different users, a block was appropriate. Peter did not revert four times and I've disagreed with him many times on many subjects and I supported and helped with enforcement of his arbitration sanctions when he was banned. I really find your "suggestions" about me offensive, Lester. You lot can go and sort out whatever you want in or out on the talk page first. I'm as involved with the content as anyone else? That's just rubbish. I haven't edited the article since last year! And other than commenting on you using of the talk page to co-ordinate a user RFC a few months ago I don't think I've been on talk page for months either. That's not "involved".[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
274797 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 274796 +++$+++ 2008-08-10 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.218395820E09 +++$+++ I'm just wondering why MickMacNee was just blocked for 48 hours and not longer since it seems they have a past history (Infact I would say that they're close to a indef ban)? Peter did the right thing (in away) as the content was just one source that didn't support the content but should have sorted help from an Admin.  +++$+++ ::I'm just wondering why MickMacNee was just blocked for 48 hours and not longer since it seems they have a past history (Infact I would say that they're close to a indef ban)? Peter did the right thing (in away) as the content was just one source that didn't support the content but should have sorted help from an Admin. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 12:17, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
274798 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 274797 +++$+++ 2008-08-10 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.218415500E09 +++$+++ My opinions only, as always, but - while I disagree with Skyring's reasoning, and would note that calling something BLP and using that as a reason to revert isn't appropriate behaviour, I support the text in question's temporary redaction just because the section of the article in question already looks like one of those snowmen that's been constructed from throwing random snowballs at a single point and calling what stands a snowman, and this particular addition, which had escaped scrutiny owing to the ICC business, stood out like a sore thumb. I think it will be reincluded as soon as we can figure out how to do that. I'd additionally support Sarah in saying that she has not been involved in the article or its poisonous editing environment. I would have to admit I myself am now involved, although I came in as a neutral party earlier this year. In answer to Bidgee: as an admin I would feel uncomfortable making a decision that is really the community's to make, he's not a vandal or SPA and he has been of value on the project, and blocks are intended to prevent damage rather than punish the user. Any significant action would need the support of the community, on the basis of whether the risks\/problems outweigh the benefits, and if it's felt that is needed, somebody should draft it. I am not sure that I would support it, though.  +++$+++ :::My opinions only, as always, but - while I disagree with Skyring's reasoning, and would note that calling something BLP and using that as a reason to revert isn't appropriate behaviour, I support the text in question's temporary redaction just because the section of the article in question already looks like one of those snowmen that's been constructed from throwing random snowballs at a single point and calling what stands a snowman, and this particular addition, which had escaped scrutiny owing to the ICC business, stood out like a sore thumb. I think it will be reincluded as soon as we can figure out how to do that. I'd additionally support Sarah in saying that she has not been involved in the article or its poisonous editing environment. I would have to admit I myself am now involved, although I came in as a neutral party earlier this year. In answer to Bidgee: as an admin I would feel uncomfortable making a decision that is really the community's to make, he's not a vandal or SPA and he has been of value on the project, and blocks are intended to prevent damage rather than punish the user. Any significant action would need the support of the community, on the basis of whether the risks/problems outweigh the benefits, and if it's felt that is needed, somebody should draft it. I am not sure that I would support it, though. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 17:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
274799 +++$+++ Matilda +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 2008-08-10 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.218437160E09 +++$+++ I would suggest strongly that you are not an uninvolved administrator given your commentary at WP:ANI and WP:AN and should have left the block and the page protection to absolutely uninvolved administrators. Although you note at User talk:Skyring ''The only reason I'm not right now is that he was edit warring against two of you and reverted four times, but another admin might decide that you should be blocked too. I don't see how that material violates BLP so I don't think you were reverting under that protection.''  Given that you did the block, there is no apparent report at WP:3RR there is no reason for an uninvolved admin to even be aware of the case. Skyring asserts he ''It's still a 3RR vio, and I'll hand it over to the admin cadre for action.'' but did not report (and nor did he necessarily need to).  You may be within your rights to perform admin actions but your assertion ''So I have not been involved with these content disputes but I have been watching it '' [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=230542288 at WP:AN ] is disingenuous in my view.  you cannot watch, comment on WP:AN and ANI on it and not be involved - you have strong views and have expressed them as is your right but thereby become \"involved\" .<\/br>  You suggested  that ''I share Orderinchaos's concerns about some of Matilda's actions on this page.'' ... ''I am quite concerned that she has become so involved that she has compromised herself and should not be using her tools at all in regard to this page or any of these users.'' - I suggest you look at your own actions and reconsider whether you are uninvolved. That applies to any admin who has been watching the dispute and has formed a view.  I call again for uninvolved admins - not pseudo-uninvolved. -- +++$+++ *I would suggest strongly that you are not an uninvolved administrator given your commentary at WP:ANI and WP:AN and should have left the block and the page protection to absolutely uninvolved administrators. Although you note at User talk:Skyring ''The only reason I'm not right now is that he was edit warring against two of you and reverted four times, but another admin might decide that you should be blocked too. I don't see how that material violates BLP so I don't think you were reverting under that protection.''  Given that you did the block, there is no apparent report at WP:3RR there is no reason for an uninvolved admin to even be aware of the case. Skyring asserts he ''It's still a 3RR vio, and I'll hand it over to the admin cadre for action.'' but did not report (and nor did he necessarily need to).  You may be within your rights to perform admin actions but your assertion ''So I have not been involved with these content disputes but I have been watching it '' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=230542288 at WP:AN ] is disingenuous in my view.  you cannot watch, comment on WP:AN and ANI on it and not be involved - you have strong views and have expressed them as is your right but thereby become "involved" .</br>  You suggested  that ''I share Orderinchaos's concerns about some of Matilda's actions on this page.'' ... ''I am quite concerned that she has become so involved that she has compromised herself and should not be using her tools at all in regard to this page or any of these users.'' - I suggest you look at your own actions and reconsider whether you are uninvolved. That applies to any admin who has been watching the dispute and has formed a view.  I call again for uninvolved admins - not pseudo-uninvolved. --[[User:Matilda|Matilda]] <sup>[[User_talk:Matilda|talk]]</sup> 23:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
274800 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 274799 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.218438480E09 +++$+++ It was reported to RPP so of course there was reason for administrators to be aware. I reject completely the suggestion that I'm \"involved\" with that page and therefore cannot protect it when necessary. I would like to respond further to a couple of things you've said but I'm just on my way out for the rest of the day. Maybe tonight. But ''seriously'', you hardblocked the account being used to write an RFC about you...  +++$+++ ::It was reported to RPP so of course there was reason for administrators to be aware. I reject completely the suggestion that I'm "involved" with that page and therefore cannot protect it when necessary. I would like to respond further to a couple of things you've said but I'm just on my way out for the rest of the day. Maybe tonight. But ''seriously'', you hardblocked the account being used to write an RFC about you... [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:08, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
274801 +++$+++ Matilda +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 274800 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.218438720E09 +++$+++ As I have said repeatedly - the RfC had been lodged - I did not interfere in anyway with the development or lodgment of the RfC. -- +++$+++ :::As I have said repeatedly - the RfC had been lodged - I did not interfere in anyway with the development or lodgment of the RfC. --[[User:Matilda|Matilda]] <sup>[[User_talk:Matilda|talk]]</sup> 00:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
274802 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 274801 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.218441960E09 +++$+++ Whether the RFC was finished or not, do you really think you were sufficiently uninvolved to implement any administrative actions? Sufficiently uninvolved by your definition of \"uninvolved\"? Or does your definition of \"involved\" only apply to other admins?  +++$+++ ::::Whether the RFC was finished or not, do you really think you were sufficiently uninvolved to implement any administrative actions? Sufficiently uninvolved by your definition of "uninvolved"? Or does your definition of "involved" only apply to other admins? [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
274803 +++$+++ Matilda +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 274800 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.218439020E09 +++$+++ The request for block may have been reported at [[Wikipedia:RPP#John_Howard_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29]] but is now marked a fulfilled thus no reason for anyone to revisit - the 3RR violation by MickMacNee  was not as far as I am aware reported and thus the editwarring by other editors was not scrutinised by other than involved editors and admins or you.-- +++$+++ :::The request for block may have been reported at [[Wikipedia:RPP#John_Howard_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29]] but is now marked a fulfilled thus no reason for anyone to revisit - the 3RR violation by MickMacNee  was not as far as I am aware reported and thus the editwarring by other editors was not scrutinised by other than involved editors and admins or you.--[[User:Matilda|Matilda]] <sup>[[User_talk:Matilda|talk]]</sup> 00:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
274804 +++$+++ Matilda +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 274802 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.218443760E09 +++$+++ <small>(copied largely from my answer to from MMN's talk page but explanded here to deal with other points raised by Sarah) <\/small>I by no means suggest I am uninvolved - perhaps to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=230681162 quote Orderinchaos ] ''While ''personal attacks'' are never justified, ''reasonable questioning of actions'' is expected and not to be discouraged at all.''  - to suggest that your actions cannot be questioned by me or any other editor is an extraordinary defence - so is the ''ad hominem'' or [[pot calling the kettle black]] argument.  <\/br>I have already explained on your usertalkpage and on ANI that I hardblocked sockpuppet accounts used by an abuser in the past of sockpuppetry only when he had finished using them to file the RfC - I in no way interfered with his preparation or filing the RfC - the block had an unintended consequence of inconveniencing Skyring slightly, which he did not ask me to fix but took to ANI.  I acted in good faith to try not to inflame an already inflamed situation - I failed - quite prepared to admit it and that it would have been handled better if handled differently. I have taken on board your criticisms of my actions which were after the event - I am really not sure what else i can do except say ''Noted'' !?! <\/br>Your actions (and inactions - for example not blocking Skyring for editwarring too) subsequent to your comments on WP:AN and WP:ANI have not helped to calm the situation.  <\/br>My definition of uninvolved in this case is that there are in excess of 1500 admins out there, many of whom have '''not''' been talking on or off-wiki with involved editors and admins.  I suggest that almost any of the Australian admins comes with prejudices about the content and some of the participants and has quite possibly been corresponding off-wiki on the subject.  This has become an incredibly complex situation which is incidentally very little to do with content.  I can write further but ...  I will save it for another time.  I would be absolutely appalled that you could consider violating OTRS and I would suggest that even mentioning that there may be a [[Wikipedia:OTRS]] case or cases is in fact improper.  This situation is not dying down and needs proper resolution and that in my view is best supplied by uninvolved <small>(like really really uninvolved as per my definition)<\/small> admins who come to the issue with little to no prior involvement with involved editors. I do not propose that that solution has to apply for all times - but this is messy - and in fact just got messier. -- +++$+++ :::::<small>(copied largely from my answer to from MMN's talk page but explanded here to deal with other points raised by Sarah) </small>I by no means suggest I am uninvolved - perhaps to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=230681162 quote Orderinchaos ] ''While ''personal attacks'' are never justified, ''reasonable questioning of actions'' is expected and not to be discouraged at all.''  - to suggest that your actions cannot be questioned by me or any other editor is an extraordinary defence - so is the ''ad hominem'' or [[pot calling the kettle black]] argument.  </br>I have already explained on your usertalkpage and on ANI that I hardblocked sockpuppet accounts used by an abuser in the past of sockpuppetry only when he had finished using them to file the RfC - I in no way interfered with his preparation or filing the RfC - the block had an unintended consequence of inconveniencing Skyring slightly, which he did not ask me to fix but took to ANI.  I acted in good faith to try not to inflame an already inflamed situation - I failed - quite prepared to admit it and that it would have been handled better if handled differently. I have taken on board your criticisms of my actions which were after the event - I am really not sure what else i can do except say ''Noted'' !?! </br>Your actions (and inactions - for example not blocking Skyring for editwarring too) subsequent to your comments on WP:AN and WP:ANI have not helped to calm the situation.  </br>My definition of uninvolved in this case is that there are in excess of 1500 admins out there, many of whom have '''not''' been talking on or off-wiki with involved editors and admins.  I suggest that almost any of the Australian admins comes with prejudices about the content and some of the participants and has quite possibly been corresponding off-wiki on the subject.  This has become an incredibly complex situation which is incidentally very little to do with content.  I can write further but ...  I will save it for another time.  I would be absolutely appalled that you could consider violating OTRS and I would suggest that even mentioning that there may be a [[Wikipedia:OTRS]] case or cases is in fact improper.  This situation is not dying down and needs proper resolution and that in my view is best supplied by uninvolved <small>(like really really uninvolved as per my definition)</small> admins who come to the issue with little to no prior involvement with involved editors. I do not propose that that solution has to apply for all times - but this is messy - and in fact just got messier. --[[User:Matilda|Matilda]] <sup>[[User_talk:Matilda|talk]]</sup> 01:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
274805 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 274804 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.218446280E09 +++$+++ This situation is making a mockery of the lot of us, though. We are all normally able to collaborate and cooperate on WP:AUS and I'm not entirely sure to this point what went wrong. I think some thoroughly silly things have been done and said by several parties (and I do not exclude myself from this), it's probably coming a time soon where we should draw a line under it and move on, especially as it seems the John Howard article may just improve out of it all.  +++$+++ ::::::This situation is making a mockery of the lot of us, though. We are all normally able to collaborate and cooperate on WP:AUS and I'm not entirely sure to this point what went wrong. I think some thoroughly silly things have been done and said by several parties (and I do not exclude myself from this), it's probably coming a time soon where we should draw a line under it and move on, especially as it seems the John Howard article may just improve out of it all. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 02:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
274806 +++$+++ Skyring +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274795 +++$+++ 274805 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.218497580E09 +++$+++ On that note, may I put in a request that MickMacNee be unblocked early, so that he can participate in discussion? -- +++$+++ :::::::On that note, may I put in a request that MickMacNee be unblocked early, so that he can participate in discussion? --[[User:Skyring|Pete]] ([[User talk:Skyring|talk]]) 16:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

12653 +++$+++ Meneerke bloem +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-06 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.307379660E09 +++$+++ Best regards, -- +++$+++ Best regards, --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 10:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
12654 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12653 +++$+++ 12653 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.307417100E09 +++$+++ Ah, I was taking \"arise\" literally\u2014a plant rising up from the ground. I think maybe \"originate\" might work here. Fixed now.  +++$+++ :Ah, I was taking "arise" literally—a plant rising up from the ground. I think maybe "originate" might work here. Fixed now. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 20:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
12655 +++$+++ Meneerke bloem +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12653 +++$+++ 12654 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.307463480E09 +++$+++ Thank you again for your help. -- +++$+++ ::Thank you again for your help. --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 09:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
12656 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12653 +++$+++ 12655 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.307498280E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Anytime. I fixed one more thing just now. Oh, and I keep forgetting to mention: since you'd begun the article with British spelling (\"colours\"), I continued in that vein (\"programme\").  +++$+++ :::You're welcome. Anytime. I fixed one more thing just now. Oh, and I keep forgetting to mention: since you'd begun the article with British spelling ("colours"), I continued in that vein ("programme"). [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 18:58, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

536943 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536943 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-13 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.144984680E09 +++$+++ Credo che la ultima edit battaglia a l'articolo di [[Macedon]] era trivia e tottalmente unimportante. Ho fatto una proposta piu semplice (anche se l'articolo era a la versione degli altri grechi) che credo puo contribuire a finire questa battaglia stupida. Se ci sono altri raggioni per tua scelta, per favore dimi.  +++$+++ Credo che la ultima edit battaglia a l'articolo di [[Macedon]] era trivia e tottalmente unimportante. Ho fatto una proposta piu semplice (anche se l'articolo era a la versione degli altri grechi) che credo puo contribuire a finire questa battaglia stupida. Se ci sono altri raggioni per tua scelta, per favore dimi. [[User:NikoSilver|<font color ="white"><font style="background: #777;">&nbsp;<font style="background: #888;">N<font style="background: #999;">i<font style="background: #aaa;">k<font style="background: #bbb;">o<font style="background: #ccc;"><b>S</b></font><b>il</b></font><b>v</b></font><b>e</b></font><b>r</b></font>&nbsp;</font></font>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 20:18, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
536944 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536943 +++$+++ 536943 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.145051340E09 +++$+++ Tuo amico,  +++$+++ :Tuo amico, [[User:NikoSilver|<font color ="white"><font style="background: #777;">&nbsp;<font style="background: #888;">N<font style="background: #999;">i<font style="background: #aaa;">k<font style="background: #bbb;">o<font style="background: #ccc;"><b>S</b></font><b>il</b></font><b>v</b></font><b>e</b></font><b>r</b></font>&nbsp;</font></font>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 14:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
536945 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536943 +++$+++ 536944 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.145070420E09 +++$+++ Ho visto [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Macedon&diff=48463269&oldid=48334492 questo] e volevo ringraziarti. Spero che non l'hai fatto solo perche l'ho richiesto io...  +++$+++ ::Ho visto [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Macedon&diff=48463269&oldid=48334492 questo] e volevo ringraziarti. Spero che non l'hai fatto solo perche l'ho richiesto io... [[User:NikoSilver|<font color ="white"><font style="background: #777;">&nbsp;<font style="background: #888;">N<font style="background: #999;">i<font style="background: #aaa;">k<font style="background: #bbb;">o<font style="background: #ccc;"><b>S</b></font><b>il</b></font><b>v</b></font><b>e</b></font><b>r</b></font>&nbsp;</font></font>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 20:07, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

12658 +++$+++ Meneerke bloem +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.308526080E09 +++$+++ '''PS:''' This anonymous user did also the same on the page of the French site. -- +++$+++ '''PS:''' This anonymous user did also the same on the page of the French site. --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 16:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
12659 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.308534180E09 +++$+++ I'm barely here today\u2014just logging in to deal with anything on my watchlist. I'll be happy to look into the situation later (in the next 10\u201324 hours). In the meantime, don't revert anymore or you'll risk being blocked. Just explain your reasoning clearly on the article's talk page, and don't make any accusations about the other editor. There are several noticeboards and WikiProjects you could post a note at, but if there's any chance you've gone past three reverts, you'd probably [[WP:Boomerang|better not]].  +++$+++ :I'm barely here today—just logging in to deal with anything on my watchlist. I'll be happy to look into the situation later (in the next 10–24 hours). In the meantime, don't revert anymore or you'll risk being blocked. Just explain your reasoning clearly on the article's talk page, and don't make any accusations about the other editor. There are several noticeboards and WikiProjects you could post a note at, but if there's any chance you've gone past three reverts, you'd probably [[WP:Boomerang|better not]]. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 18:43, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
12660 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.308534360E09 +++$+++ P.S. If you think that defamation of a ''living person'' is occurring, you should report it [[Wikipedia:BLP_noticeboard|here]] (and in that case your reverts should be exempt from [[WP:3RR]].)  +++$+++ :P.S. If you think that defamation of a ''living person'' is occurring, you should report it [[Wikipedia:BLP_noticeboard|here]] (and in that case your reverts should be exempt from [[WP:3RR]].) [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 18:46, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
12661 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.308571800E09 +++$+++ All right, I took a quick look (and made a couple of minor changes). The IP editor was certainly in the wrong to insert an unsourced allegation of copyright violations, and I have left a warning on their talk page. If they do it again, the [[Wikipedia:BLP_noticeboard]] is the best place to report it. In the meantime, I'm wondering about the two external links: S\xe9bastien Letocart and Nicolas Couton. The Manual of Style deprecates that kind of link. If they meet notability standards, I'd suggest making them red links pending the creation of articles about them.  +++$+++ :All right, I took a quick look (and made a couple of minor changes). The IP editor was certainly in the wrong to insert an unsourced allegation of copyright violations, and I have left a warning on their talk page. If they do it again, the [[Wikipedia:BLP_noticeboard]] is the best place to report it. In the meantime, I'm wondering about the two external links: Sébastien Letocart and Nicolas Couton. The Manual of Style deprecates that kind of link. If they meet notability standards, I'd suggest making them red links pending the creation of articles about them. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 05:10, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
12662 +++$+++ Meneerke bloem +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 12661 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.308583080E09 +++$+++ Best regards, -- +++$+++ ::Best regards, --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 08:18, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
12663 +++$+++ Meneerke bloem +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 12662 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.308604380E09 +++$+++ Thank you again for your wise advice. -- +++$+++ :::Thank you again for your wise advice. --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 14:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
12664 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 12663 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.308612240E09 +++$+++ I have reverted it based on concern over neutral wording and opened a thread on the talk page which I hope both you and the IP will use. Discussion may or may not prove productive, but it should have begun long ago.  +++$+++ ::::I have reverted it based on concern over neutral wording and opened a thread on the talk page which I hope both you and the IP will use. Discussion may or may not prove productive, but it should have begun long ago. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 16:24, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
12665 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.308571980E09 +++$+++ You don't shy away from controversial topics, do you? Your edit looks like a definite improvement.  +++$+++ :You don't shy away from controversial topics, do you? Your edit looks like a definite improvement. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 05:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
12666 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 12662 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 07:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308579720E09 +++$+++ Slant-6? Stop, you're giving me flashbacks of cars I drove in a earlier millennium.  +++$+++ :::Slant-6? Stop, you're giving me flashbacks of cars I drove in a earlier millennium. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 07:22, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
12667 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 12664 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.308612540E09 +++$+++ Hadn't realized you were retro (if only on the automotive front). What, no Chargers or 'cudas or other well-muscled machines in the stable?  +++$+++ :::::Hadn't realized you were retro (if only on the automotive front). What, no Chargers or 'cudas or other well-muscled machines in the stable? [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 16:29, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
12668 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 12658 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.308656460E09 +++$+++ Check your email.  +++$+++ :Check your email. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 04:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

536947 +++$+++ HJMG +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-17 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.145284140E09 +++$+++ Hi - I've started translating the French article - and also put a note on the translation page inviting comments on the title. -- +++$+++ Hi - I've started translating the French article - and also put a note on the translation page inviting comments on the title. --[[User:HJMG|HJMG]] 07:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
536948 +++$+++ HJMG +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536947 +++$+++ 536947 +++$+++ 2006-04-18 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.145369520E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot - -- +++$+++ :Thanks a lot - --[[User:HJMG|HJMG]] 07:12, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

611113 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-03 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.278202500E09 +++$+++ I thought it was me that had put it in the wrong section from the beginning, hadn't noticed that you moved it. -- +++$+++ I thought it was me that had put it in the wrong section from the beginning, hadn't noticed that you moved it. --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 17:15, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
611114 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611113 +++$+++ 611113 +++$+++ 2010-07-03 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.278202620E09 +++$+++ It's alright, we all make mistakes sometimes. Besides, at least you didn't delete the main page.  +++$+++ :It's alright, we all make mistakes sometimes. Besides, at least you didn't delete the main page. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 17:17, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

307945 +++$+++ Calgacus +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307945 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-04 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.165267080E09 +++$+++ Hi. Can you do me and wikipedia a big favour and give [[Clement of Dunblane]] a quick copyedit (sentences structures, unclear info, etc). I'm personally happy with it, but as it's up for FA, it has to satisfiy a broad range of editorally tastes. Best regards, ''' +++$+++ Hi. Can you do me and wikipedia a big favour and give [[Clement of Dunblane]] a quick copyedit (sentences structures, unclear info, etc). I'm personally happy with it, but as it's up for FA, it has to satisfiy a broad range of editorally tastes. Best regards, '''[[User:Calgacus|Calgacus]] (''[[User talk:Calgacus|ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ]]'')''' 13:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
307946 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307945 +++$+++ 307945 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.165274580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for what I take as a compliment. I've had a go at the opening paragraph, but don't expect everyone to agree with my style and would welcome feedback to see if that's on the right lines. ..  +++$+++ :Thanks for what I take as a compliment. I've had a go at the opening paragraph, but don't expect everyone to agree with my style and would welcome feedback to see if that's on the right lines. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
307947 +++$+++ Calgacus +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307945 +++$+++ 307946 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.165275600E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, Dave. Seems fine to me. This request was made in response to [[User:Tony1]]'s comments on [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Clement of Dunblane]]. Did the rest of the article read ok? ''' +++$+++ :: Thank you very much, Dave. Seems fine to me. This request was made in response to [[User:Tony1]]'s comments on [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Clement of Dunblane]]. Did the rest of the article read ok? '''[[User:Calgacus|Calgacus]] (''[[User talk:Calgacus|ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ]]'')''' 15:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
307948 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307945 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.165281060E09 +++$+++ Having looked through about half of the article, it basically looked fine and very informative. However I've a lot of respect for Tony's judgement, he's rightly been very critical of some of my writing in the past. Will try to find time to go through it sometime, but have a lot on my plate with Darwin just now so can't promise when. ..  +++$+++ ::::Having looked through about half of the article, it basically looked fine and very informative. However I've a lot of respect for Tony's judgement, he's rightly been very critical of some of my writing in the past. Will try to find time to go through it sometime, but have a lot on my plate with Darwin just now so can't promise when. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
307949 +++$+++ Calgacus +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 307945 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.165281900E09 +++$+++ That's fine, at least you did something. Many thanks. ''' +++$+++ ::::: That's fine, at least you did something. Many thanks. '''[[User:Calgacus|Calgacus]] (''[[User talk:Calgacus|ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ]]'')''' 17:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

274811 +++$+++ SkierRMH +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-25 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.219657800E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know that I've updated the article that's transcluded protected at\/to your user subpage [[User:Sarah\/PT]].  It's a legit film in this revision - looks like there was some move problems in the past.  It needs work, but is at least a decent stub.  Perhaps a move protect?  Ideas? Thanks!   +++$+++ Just to let you know that I've updated the article that's transcluded protected at/to your user subpage [[User:Sarah/PT]].  It's a legit film in this revision - looks like there was some move problems in the past.  It needs work, but is at least a decent stub.  Perhaps a move protect?  Ideas? Thanks!  [[User:SkierRMH|<span style="color:ForestGreen">SkierRMH</span>]] ([[User_talk:SkierRMH|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 02:50, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
274812 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274811 +++$+++ 274811 +++$+++ 2008-09-03 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.220436420E09 +++$+++ The problem isn't the existence of it, the problem is that it is being posted by sockpuppets of  +++$+++ :The problem isn't the existence of it, the problem is that it is being posted by sockpuppets of [[User:Gerald Gonzalez]] AKA Aiza00. No doubt this current version of the article has also been posted by one of his socks. See [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Aiza00]], [[Wikipedia:Long_term_abuse/Gerald_Gonzalez]], [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Gerald_Gonzalez]]. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

536956 +++$+++ KNHaw +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536956 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-24 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.145939760E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:KNHaw|KNHaw]] 21:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
536957 +++$+++ KNHaw +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536956 +++$+++ 536956 +++$+++ 2006-04-27 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.146197520E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:KNHaw|KNHaw]] 21:12, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

12669 +++$+++ Alanmaass +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.308545640E09 +++$+++ Hi Rivertorch, figured I'd thank you on your talk page, I appreciate the third opinion on the Revert war over the funding section on the ISO page (http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:International_Socialist_Organization#Funding). You're right about it not being vandalism (I let my temper get the best of me), and I'd be thrilled to let disinterested editors keep a watch on all this. It just seemed like no one did, even after the page had this non-Wikipedia-standard material on it for days--I suppose that's probably par for the course for less traveled pages. So can I ask you?: I've started to look into dispute resolution, as recommended by Fastily, but there are so many different levels to enter into things. I'm skeptical that Jtizzi, whose Wikipedia authoring interest seems laser-focused on this one section of the ISO page, for whatever reason, will be convinced by my contention that there is no relevance for this information on the ISO page--that leaves very little room for collaboration. So what's the appropriate form of dispute resolution to pursue, do you think? -- +++$+++ Hi Rivertorch, figured I'd thank you on your talk page, I appreciate the third opinion on the Revert war over the funding section on the ISO page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:International_Socialist_Organization#Funding). You're right about it not being vandalism (I let my temper get the best of me), and I'd be thrilled to let disinterested editors keep a watch on all this. It just seemed like no one did, even after the page had this non-Wikipedia-standard material on it for days--I suppose that's probably par for the course for less traveled pages. So can I ask you?: I've started to look into dispute resolution, as recommended by Fastily, but there are so many different levels to enter into things. I'm skeptical that Jtizzi, whose Wikipedia authoring interest seems laser-focused on this one section of the ISO page, for whatever reason, will be convinced by my contention that there is no relevance for this information on the ISO page--that leaves very little room for collaboration. So what's the appropriate form of dispute resolution to pursue, do you think? --[[User:Alanmaass|Alanmaass]] ([[User talk:Alanmaass|talk]]) 21:54, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
12670 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12669 +++$+++ 12669 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308572520E09 +++$+++ Dispute resolution of any kind would probably be jumping the gun at this point. The [[Wikipedia:BURDEN|burden]] is on Jtizzi to make a persuasive case for including the disputed content. Until or unless that happens, there is consensus to exclude it. As long as discussion is proceeding on the talk page and the content isn't being restored, things are working the way they're supposed to.  +++$+++ :Dispute resolution of any kind would probably be jumping the gun at this point. The [[Wikipedia:BURDEN|burden]] is on Jtizzi to make a persuasive case for including the disputed content. Until or unless that happens, there is consensus to exclude it. As long as discussion is proceeding on the talk page and the content isn't being restored, things are working the way they're supposed to. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 05:22, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
12671 +++$+++ Alanmaass +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12669 +++$+++ 12670 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.308785100E09 +++$+++ That sounds right, thanks much for the advice. -- +++$+++ ::That sounds right, thanks much for the advice. --[[User:Alanmaass|Alanmaass]] ([[User talk:Alanmaass|talk]]) 16:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

12672 +++$+++ Meneerke bloem +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-22 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.308791520E09 +++$+++ Best regards, -- +++$+++ Best regards, --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 18:12, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
12673 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12672 +++$+++ 12672 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308799320E09 +++$+++ I made some minor grammatical corrections and delinked Fine. Further comments on the talk page.  +++$+++ :I made some minor grammatical corrections and delinked Fine. Further comments on the talk page. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 20:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
12674 +++$+++ Meneerke bloem +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12672 +++$+++ 12673 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.308874200E09 +++$+++ Thank you, River. I have followed your suggestions and that of B-J. Cohrs. Hopefully you find it now OK. -- +++$+++ ::Thank you, River. I have followed your suggestions and that of B-J. Cohrs. Hopefully you find it now OK. --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 17:10, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

274817 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274817 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-06 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.220694540E09 +++$+++ ... why you aren't talking to me any more Sarah. You are glued to the screen watching the mighty Hawks beat their opponents to submission.  Fair enough - here's three beers and three cheers [[Image:Icon beer.gif]] [[Image:Icon beer.gif]] [[Image:Icon beer.gif]]. -- +++$+++ ... why you aren't talking to me any more Sarah. You are glued to the screen watching the mighty Hawks beat their opponents to submission.  Fair enough - here's three beers and three cheers [[Image:Icon beer.gif]] [[Image:Icon beer.gif]] [[Image:Icon beer.gif]]. --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 02:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
274818 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274817 +++$+++ 274817 +++$+++ 2008-09-07 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.220776980E09 +++$+++ Waaaa? Not talking to you?! Since when? I sent you an email before I went on my wikibreak but I've been away lately as I've been really busy IRL. I'm not really back yet, just checking in on the NYScholar issue, but I shall send you another email soon with my postal addy so you can send me a postcard on your next travels. And yes, Friday night was glorious! Woohoo! Up the mighty Hawks!  +++$+++ :Waaaa? Not talking to you?! Since when? I sent you an email before I went on my wikibreak but I've been away lately as I've been really busy IRL. I'm not really back yet, just checking in on the NYScholar issue, but I shall send you another email soon with my postal addy so you can send me a postcard on your next travels. And yes, Friday night was glorious! Woohoo! Up the mighty Hawks! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

12675 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-27 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.309180800E09 +++$+++ Hi there. First of all, thank you for your work\u2014but please be careful when reverting content removal in [[WP:BLP]] articles. In many cases, they are legitimate challenges, not vandalism. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Colin_Firth&diff=436452212&oldid=436368995 This] was one such edit: the cited source actually did not support the claim in any way, and I have therefore removed the passage from the article again. Best wishes,  +++$+++ Hi there. First of all, thank you for your work—but please be careful when reverting content removal in [[WP:BLP]] articles. In many cases, they are legitimate challenges, not vandalism. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colin_Firth&diff=436452212&oldid=436368995 This] was one such edit: the cited source actually did not support the claim in any way, and I have therefore removed the passage from the article again. Best wishes, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 06:20, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
12676 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12675 +++$+++ 12675 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.309188480E09 +++$+++ Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I got distracted and didn't check the linked article except (1) to confirm that it was actually a ''Telegraph'' news article and (2) to read the subhead, which states that Firth \"has confessed to having little support for the beloved monarch's descendants \u2013 because he is a republican.\" It's a bit of a stretch to say the source \"did not support the claim in any way\", but I certainly would agree that it didn't support it entirely, and therefore the removal of the text was constructive. I will strike my warning on the IP's talkpage.  +++$+++ :Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I got distracted and didn't check the linked article except (1) to confirm that it was actually a ''Telegraph'' news article and (2) to read the subhead, which states that Firth "has confessed to having little support for the beloved monarch's descendants – because he is a republican." It's a bit of a stretch to say the source "did not support the claim in any way", but I certainly would agree that it didn't support it entirely, and therefore the removal of the text was constructive. I will strike my warning on the IP's talkpage. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 08:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
12677 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12675 +++$+++ 12675 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.309188600E09 +++$+++ No, I won't. You've wielded your mop. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :No, I won't. You've wielded your mop. Thanks again. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 08:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

274822 +++$+++ ThuranX +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-07 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.220792580E09 +++$+++ Yes, but like last time, we can take comfort in the fact that most others can read for themselves and come to a reasonable conclusion. I hope.  +++$+++ Yes, but like last time, we can take comfort in the fact that most others can read for themselves and come to a reasonable conclusion. I hope. [[User:ThuranX|ThuranX]] ([[User talk:ThuranX|talk]]) 06:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
274823 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274822 +++$+++ 274822 +++$+++ 2008-09-07 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.220813400E09 +++$+++ I'm rather speechless at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=236809482 this]. It's utterly astounding and I feel like I'm in the [[Twilight Zone]]. I can only hope that people with Clue arrive soon but I fear like last time the sheer length will deter anyone with any sense.  +++$+++ :I'm rather speechless at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=236809482 this]. It's utterly astounding and I feel like I'm in the [[Twilight Zone]]. I can only hope that people with Clue arrive soon but I fear like last time the sheer length will deter anyone with any sense. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
274824 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274822 +++$+++ 274823 +++$+++ 2008-09-07 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.220821800E09 +++$+++ Hey, why hasn't anyone asked Keeper to mentor NYS? :)  +++$+++ ::Hey, why hasn't anyone asked Keeper to mentor NYS? :) [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 14:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
274825 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274822 +++$+++ 274824 +++$+++ 2008-09-07 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.220823480E09 +++$+++ That's a good idea, Viri! Out of interest, I just put that really, really, loooong post into Word and it's over 2000 words! When I was at uni, I sometimes used to have trouble stretching my essays out to the set length and I just can't believe that someone spits out single ANI posts that are essay length in one go. I hate to think what his total ANI word count is. *rolls eyes*  +++$+++ :::That's a good idea, Viri! Out of interest, I just put that really, really, loooong post into Word and it's over 2000 words! When I was at uni, I sometimes used to have trouble stretching my essays out to the set length and I just can't believe that someone spits out single ANI posts that are essay length in one go. I hate to think what his total ANI word count is. *rolls eyes* [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

12680 +++$+++ WereSpielChequers +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-29 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.309364940E09 +++$+++ Hi, as requested, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion#Template:AnonymousWelcome the TFD is here.] '' +++$+++ Hi, as requested, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion#Template:AnonymousWelcome the TFD is here.] ''[[User:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkGreen">Ϣere</span>]][[User talk:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkRed">Spiel</span>]]<span style="color:#CC5500">Chequers''</span> 09:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
12681 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12680 +++$+++ 12680 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.309489740E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 20:09, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

274826 +++$+++ Aunt Entropy +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274826 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-07 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.220831340E09 +++$+++ I think I've figured out the reason for this constant \"I'm leaving now\" meme we see from NYS. I recall her doing this before, and then getting upset that people still responded. I think it's an attempt to silence people from talking about her, as it is \"rude\" to talk behind another's back. (OMG, I used a particular personal pronoun there! How ruuuuuuude of me!)  +++$+++ I think I've figured out the reason for this constant "I'm leaving now" meme we see from NYS. I recall her doing this before, and then getting upset that people still responded. I think it's an attempt to silence people from talking about her, as it is "rude" to talk behind another's back. (OMG, I used a particular personal pronoun there! How ruuuuuuude of me!) [[User:Aunt Entropy|Aunt Entropy]] ([[User talk:Aunt Entropy|talk]]) 16:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
274827 +++$+++ ThuranX +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274826 +++$+++ 274826 +++$+++ 2008-09-08 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.220938680E09 +++$+++ Of course it is, was there any doubt? I noted that in one prior thread, or at least thought it. I may not have typed it, in the interest of 'civility', NYScholar's favorite invocation against actual material discussion. But yeah, that's why. In fact, look back and you'll find comments about that sort of thing before.  +++$+++ :Of course it is, was there any doubt? I noted that in one prior thread, or at least thought it. I may not have typed it, in the interest of 'civility', NYScholar's favorite invocation against actual material discussion. But yeah, that's why. In fact, look back and you'll find comments about that sort of thing before. [[User:ThuranX|ThuranX]] ([[User talk:ThuranX|talk]]) 22:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

12683 +++$+++ LynwoodF +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-16 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310879100E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your edit. Not only did the edit that you undid contain some rather odd English; it was factually incorrect. When I lived in Strasbourg fifty-odd years ago, it was predominantly German-speaking, having been in Germany for more than half of the previous hundred years.  +++$+++ Thank you for your edit. Not only did the edit that you undid contain some rather odd English; it was factually incorrect. When I lived in Strasbourg fifty-odd years ago, it was predominantly German-speaking, having been in Germany for more than half of the previous hundred years. [[User:LynwoodF|LynwoodF]] ([[User talk:LynwoodF|talk]]) 22:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
12684 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12683 +++$+++ 12683 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.310881680E09 +++$+++ Yeah, age is subjective. What's ancient to some is quite recent to others. (And kids today are just as ignorant as I was when I was a kid!)  +++$+++ :Yeah, age is subjective. What's ancient to some is quite recent to others. (And kids today are just as ignorant as I was when I was a kid!) [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 22:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

274828 +++$+++ Platonides +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-15 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.221502560E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/es.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Usuario_Discusi%C3%B3n%3APlatonides&diff=20188416&oldid=20140432], I have renamed (and blocked) [[es:User:Crum375]] so [[User:Crum375]] can be conpletely SULed. Also, you may be interested in usurping [[es:User:Sarah]] (old account, 0 edits, 0 deleted). Let me know if you want me to do so and rename [[:es:User:Sarah Ewart]] to [[:es:User:Sarah]] (but in such case confirm here that you own the acocunt).  +++$+++ Regarding [http://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuario_Discusi%C3%B3n%3APlatonides&diff=20188416&oldid=20140432], I have renamed (and blocked) [[es:User:Crum375]] so [[User:Crum375]] can be conpletely SULed. Also, you may be interested in usurping [[es:User:Sarah]] (old account, 0 edits, 0 deleted). Let me know if you want me to do so and rename [[:es:User:Sarah Ewart]] to [[:es:User:Sarah]] (but in such case confirm here that you own the acocunt). [[User:Platonides|Platonides]] ([[User talk:Platonides|talk]]) 11:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
274829 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274828 +++$+++ 274828 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.221504420E09 +++$+++ Thanks Platonides, I really appreciate you doing that. I would love to usurp the es User:Sarah, thank you! I confirm that the es user:Sarah Ewart is in fact me. Thanks very much for dealing with that issue so quickly. Much appreciated.  +++$+++ :Thanks Platonides, I really appreciate you doing that. I would love to usurp the es User:Sarah, thank you! I confirm that the es user:Sarah Ewart is in fact me. Thanks very much for dealing with that issue so quickly. Much appreciated. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:47, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

12685 +++$+++ PiCo +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311400860E09 +++$+++ No problem  +++$+++ No problem [[User:PiCo|PiCo]] ([[User talk:PiCo|talk]]) 23:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
12686 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12685 +++$+++ 12685 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.311422580E09 +++$+++ Cool. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Cool. Thanks. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 05:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

12687 +++$+++ Atchom +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12687 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311670680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Atchom|Atchom]] 01:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
12688 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12687 +++$+++ 12687 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.311683460E09 +++$+++ Short answer: No. I don't think my edit was extraordinary or that any justification is indicated <small>(although I have to ask: does making an extraordinary edit mean I'm an extraordinary editor?)<\/small>. Long answer: The edit was back in May, and you can see from the talk page that I've made subsequent comments reflecting the ongoing discussion and my evolving understanding of the issue.<p>In any event, I'm puzzled that you've brought this to my talk page. I'm happy to discuss it further here if you'd prefer, but I think it would be better either to contribute to the discussion at [[Talk:Agatha Christie]] or just be bold and change it to what you think is right. Better yet, do both! (Btw, I admit to being more confused than ever after reading what you wrote below, but I'll look forward to seeing how it all gets resolved.) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Short answer: No. I don't think my edit was extraordinary or that any justification is indicated <small>(although I have to ask: does making an extraordinary edit mean I'm an extraordinary editor?)</small>. Long answer: The edit was back in May, and you can see from the talk page that I've made subsequent comments reflecting the ongoing discussion and my evolving understanding of the issue.<p>In any event, I'm puzzled that you've brought this to my talk page. I'm happy to discuss it further here if you'd prefer, but I think it would be better either to contribute to the discussion at [[Talk:Agatha Christie]] or just be bold and change it to what you think is right. Better yet, do both! (Btw, I admit to being more confused than ever after reading what you wrote below, but I'll look forward to seeing how it all gets resolved.) Cheers, [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 05:31, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

12690 +++$+++ Sodin +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.311724080E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Sodin|Sasha]] ([[User talk:Sodin|talk]]) 16:48, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
12691 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12690 +++$+++ 12690 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.311726120E09 +++$+++ A definite improvement. Good job!  +++$+++ :A definite improvement. Good job! [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 17:22, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

536979 +++$+++ Miskin +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-06 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.146940140E09 +++$+++ Independently of the origins of ancient Macedonians, I think you would agree that everyone in both antiquity and modern times would accept that the Macedonian ruling class descended of the [[Argos|Argives]] and [[Heracles|Heraclids]], and most definitely participated in the Olympic Games. It is blatant from ancient citations (e.g. Callisthenes, Demosthenes) that Philip II and Alexander III did claim Greek origin at least for themselves (and in several occasions for all Macedonians). Not long ago you said that Pontus was not a fully Hellenic Kingdom because the royal family claimed Persian origin. Aren't you using double standards in the case of Macedon? Why are many Roman Emperors labeled by an ethnic origin and Macedonians aren't? It's almost as if it's been done on purpose. Macedon was 100% Hellenised by the 4th century BC, and it's very probable and well supported that it's been Hellenic since the beginning. Yet the articles deal with it as if it was a barbarian Kingdom similar to Illyria. Do you honestly find the Macedon-related articles completely unbiased?  +++$+++ Independently of the origins of ancient Macedonians, I think you would agree that everyone in both antiquity and modern times would accept that the Macedonian ruling class descended of the [[Argos|Argives]] and [[Heracles|Heraclids]], and most definitely participated in the Olympic Games. It is blatant from ancient citations (e.g. Callisthenes, Demosthenes) that Philip II and Alexander III did claim Greek origin at least for themselves (and in several occasions for all Macedonians). Not long ago you said that Pontus was not a fully Hellenic Kingdom because the royal family claimed Persian origin. Aren't you using double standards in the case of Macedon? Why are many Roman Emperors labeled by an ethnic origin and Macedonians aren't? It's almost as if it's been done on purpose. Macedon was 100% Hellenised by the 4th century BC, and it's very probable and well supported that it's been Hellenic since the beginning. Yet the articles deal with it as if it was a barbarian Kingdom similar to Illyria. Do you honestly find the Macedon-related articles completely unbiased? [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 11:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
536980 +++$+++ Miskin +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536979 +++$+++ 536979 +++$+++ 2006-05-06 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.146949080E09 +++$+++ I think I wasn't very clear. I don't wish to change the status of the Macedonian language nor try to refer to Macedon as another Greek Kingdom. It was different in several cultural aspects and it has to be differentiated, at least during the Classic period (in Hellenistic time there was a clear assimilation). My objections are on the articles of the Macedonian Kings who felt themselves to be Greek (relates to our older discussion on the criteria of an ethnic group). Alexander III's and Philip II's article nowhere mentions how that at least the Argead dynasty was of Greek origin. In my opinion this is not mentioned due to the general chaos which evolves the word \"macedonia\", and not because it was simply forgotten. I don't think this is NPOV. The Macedonian royalty has always participated in the Olympics, meaning that they viewed themselves and were viewed by others as Greek. If they were really the descendants of Indo-european Greek-speakers is something irrelevant, let alone impossible to prove. I'm telling you this because I'm plannig to make some edits that will be based on ancient quotations, and I don't want it to be viewed as POV-pushing. I'll cite sources accordingly.  +++$+++ :I think I wasn't very clear. I don't wish to change the status of the Macedonian language nor try to refer to Macedon as another Greek Kingdom. It was different in several cultural aspects and it has to be differentiated, at least during the Classic period (in Hellenistic time there was a clear assimilation). My objections are on the articles of the Macedonian Kings who felt themselves to be Greek (relates to our older discussion on the criteria of an ethnic group). Alexander III's and Philip II's article nowhere mentions how that at least the Argead dynasty was of Greek origin. In my opinion this is not mentioned due to the general chaos which evolves the word "macedonia", and not because it was simply forgotten. I don't think this is NPOV. The Macedonian royalty has always participated in the Olympics, meaning that they viewed themselves and were viewed by others as Greek. If they were really the descendants of Indo-european Greek-speakers is something irrelevant, let alone impossible to prove. I'm telling you this because I'm plannig to make some edits that will be based on ancient quotations, and I don't want it to be viewed as POV-pushing. I'll cite sources accordingly. [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 13:58, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
536981 +++$+++ Miskin +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536979 +++$+++ 536980 +++$+++ 2006-05-06 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.146949920E09 +++$+++ Have a look at these passages for instance [http:\/\/www.perseus.tufts.edu\/cgi-bin\/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0072&query=section%3D%2329&layout=&loc=12.5][http:\/\/www.perseus.tufts.edu\/cgi-bin\/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0072;query=section%3D%2341;layout=;loc=12.17][http:\/\/www.perseus.tufts.edu\/cgi-bin\/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0072&query=section%3D%2346&layout=&loc=12.22][http:\/\/www.perseus.tufts.edu\/cgi-bin\/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0072&query=section%3D%2353&layout=&loc=13.6], what does it look that Philip considers himself? There are countless of such quotes by Alexander as well, and I think it needs to be mentioned in their respective articles at least how the Argead dynasty viewed itself.  +++$+++ ::Have a look at these passages for instance [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0072&query=section%3D%2329&layout=&loc=12.5][http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0072;query=section%3D%2341;layout=;loc=12.17][http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0072&query=section%3D%2346&layout=&loc=12.22][http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0072&query=section%3D%2353&layout=&loc=13.6], what does it look that Philip considers himself? There are countless of such quotes by Alexander as well, and I think it needs to be mentioned in their respective articles at least how the Argead dynasty viewed itself. [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 14:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
536982 +++$+++ Miskin +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536979 +++$+++ 536981 +++$+++ 2006-05-06 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.146950760E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure whether I want to make any edits really. I just wanted to know your opinion on this. The Argead dynasty did view itself as Greek and the Greeks let them participate in the Olympics since the at least 6th century. In what degree they were genetically the ancestors of Greek-speakers is obviously of no importance.  +++$+++ :::I'm not sure whether I want to make any edits really. I just wanted to know your opinion on this. The Argead dynasty did view itself as Greek and the Greeks let them participate in the Olympics since the at least 6th century. In what degree they were genetically the ancestors of Greek-speakers is obviously of no importance. [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 14:26, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

12692 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311990540E09 +++$+++ Hey, Rivertorch. In researching same-sex reproduction methods for a fairly new editor at the [[Sexual intercourse]] article, I wondered why such an article hasn't been created already. Do you think creating it is a good idea? From what I've seen online, I think a good article could be made about it.  +++$+++ Hey, Rivertorch. In researching same-sex reproduction methods for a fairly new editor at the [[Sexual intercourse]] article, I wondered why such an article hasn't been created already. Do you think creating it is a good idea? From what I've seen online, I think a good article could be made about it. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 18:49, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
12693 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12692 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311998160E09 +++$+++ LOL. Thanks, Scheinwerfermann. I'm sure [[User:Robertbayer|Robertbayer]], the editor I added the reproduction information for, would appreciate it a lot. I just wish he'd get in contact with me through email. Sure, I hardly check my email, but I'm getting better about that, LOL. I even let him know that he could contact me that way. But I wouldn't be surprised if decided not to because of how long I took to honor what could be viewed as a promise.  +++$+++ ::LOL. Thanks, Scheinwerfermann. I'm sure [[User:Robertbayer|Robertbayer]], the editor I added the reproduction information for, would appreciate it a lot. I just wish he'd get in contact with me through email. Sure, I hardly check my email, but I'm getting better about that, LOL. I even let him know that he could contact me that way. But I wouldn't be surprised if decided not to because of how long I took to honor what could be viewed as a promise. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 20:56, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
12694 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12692 +++$+++ 12692 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.312025400E09 +++$+++ [[Parthenogenesis]]. But seriously, folks . . . yes. If the sources are there for an article, I don't see why it wouldn't be a good idea. Let me know if I can do anything to help.  +++$+++ :[[Parthenogenesis]]. But seriously, folks . . . yes. If the sources are there for an article, I don't see why it wouldn't be a good idea. Let me know if I can do anything to help. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 04:30, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
12695 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12692 +++$+++ 12694 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.312071480E09 +++$+++ If I wasn't clear, Rivertorch, I'm talking about human same-sex reproduction methods. In regards to same-sex reproduction, I don't think of non-humans as having \"methods.\" But thank you for your input.  +++$+++ ::If I wasn't clear, Rivertorch, I'm talking about human same-sex reproduction methods. In regards to same-sex reproduction, I don't think of non-humans as having "methods." But thank you for your input. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 17:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
12696 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12692 +++$+++ 12695 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.312079160E09 +++$+++ You were entirely clear. My \"but seriously, folks\" apparently was opaque. You can see why my stand-up comedy career came to a quick and unhappy end.<small><sup>''[citation needed]''<\/sup><\/small>. (Translation for those on a vastly different humor wavelength: Ignore any signs of silliness on my part. I think you should write that article. Want some help?)  +++$+++ :::You were entirely clear. My "but seriously, folks" apparently was opaque. You can see why my stand-up comedy career came to a quick and unhappy end.<small><sup>''[citation needed]''</sup></small>. (Translation for those on a vastly different humor wavelength: Ignore any signs of silliness on my part. I think you should write that article. Want some help?) [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 19:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
12697 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12692 +++$+++ 12696 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.312096440E09 +++$+++ Yes, help would be appreciated. I need another article under my \"created\" belt, one that is not about soap operas (LOL). I moved away from mostly working on soap opera articles some time ago, but I have yet to create a non-soap opera article. It's either this or [[serial rape]], or both, before I leave Wikipedia for good (which is something I'm pretty set on these days).  +++$+++ ::::Yes, help would be appreciated. I need another article under my "created" belt, one that is not about soap operas (LOL). I moved away from mostly working on soap opera articles some time ago, but I have yet to create a non-soap opera article. It's either this or [[serial rape]], or both, before I leave Wikipedia for good (which is something I'm pretty set on these days). [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 00:14, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
12698 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12692 +++$+++ 12697 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 07:17:00 +++$+++ 1.312121820E09 +++$+++ You must do what's best for you, but I think your leaving would be Wikipedia's loss. As for the article, the topic isn't one I'm very familiar with. But I'm quite good at drudgery such as copyediting, not too shabby at writing (which I get around to all too rarely anymore), fair to middling at arranging and organizing things, and will go dig up sources if compelled to at gunpoint. (Slow Internet connection is a real limiting factor right now when running searches and downloading things.) Let me know how I can help, and I'll make every effort.  +++$+++ :::::You must do what's best for you, but I think your leaving would be Wikipedia's loss. As for the article, the topic isn't one I'm very familiar with. But I'm quite good at drudgery such as copyediting, not too shabby at writing (which I get around to all too rarely anymore), fair to middling at arranging and organizing things, and will go dig up sources if compelled to at gunpoint. (Slow Internet connection is a real limiting factor right now when running searches and downloading things.) Let me know how I can help, and I'll make every effort. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 07:17, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
12699 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12692 +++$+++ 12698 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.312164060E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Rivertorch. And if I decide to create the article, I'll definitely have you assess it for whatever improvements it might need. I might even consult with you on certain things about it before it's created. For the time being, I have other matters to attend to on Wikipedia, so I'll worry about that stuff first.  +++$+++ ::::::Thank you, Rivertorch. And if I decide to create the article, I'll definitely have you assess it for whatever improvements it might need. I might even consult with you on certain things about it before it's created. For the time being, I have other matters to attend to on Wikipedia, so I'll worry about that stuff first. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 19:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
12700 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12692 +++$+++ 12692 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.312127460E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ :Cheers, [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 08:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

274839 +++$+++ BenAveling +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-27 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.222527120E09 +++$+++ How cool was that.  +++$+++ How cool was that. [[User talk:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 07:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
274840 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274839 +++$+++ 274839 +++$+++ 2008-09-28 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.222619580E09 +++$+++ Oh yeah, that was just awesome! :) I'm so thrilled, it's been such a very long time waiting!  +++$+++ :Oh yeah, that was just awesome! :) I'm so thrilled, it's been such a very long time waiting! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
274841 +++$+++ BenAveling +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274839 +++$+++ 274840 +++$+++ 2008-09-29 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.222713480E09 +++$+++ It was the first game I've seen for ages; it was a good one to see.  Cheers,  +++$+++ ::It was the first game I've seen for ages; it was a good one to see.  Cheers, [[User talk:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 11:38, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

526404 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-03 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.165178460E09 +++$+++ I'm running VandalProof right now and it shows me you're online. Just saying hi.  +++$+++ I'm running VandalProof right now and it shows me you're online. Just saying hi. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 12:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
526405 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526404 +++$+++ 526404 +++$+++ 2006-12-03 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.165179840E09 +++$+++ VP doesn't actually have what you'd call a \"who's\" online option, but it does show \"recent changes\" with only a few seconds delay, so if someone shows up there you know they're currently online. Your edit about, I think, a marine parachute regiment showed up while I was patrolling for vandals. On another note, all three in the mediation case have now agreed to mediation, but Jergen stills want a different mediator. Your call, if you don't want to do it, that's okay.  +++$+++ :VP doesn't actually have what you'd call a "who's" online option, but it does show "recent changes" with only a few seconds delay, so if someone shows up there you know they're currently online. Your edit about, I think, a marine parachute regiment showed up while I was patrolling for vandals. On another note, all three in the mediation case have now agreed to mediation, but Jergen stills want a different mediator. Your call, if you don't want to do it, that's okay. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 13:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

274842 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274842 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-29 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.222696800E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Awarded to Sarah for her work at the Melbourne Olympic parade. ''' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Awarded to Sarah for her work at the Melbourne Olympic parade. '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 07:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
274843 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274842 +++$+++ 274842 +++$+++ 2008-09-29 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.222697220E09 +++$+++ And I second that '''in bold''' and wish I had seen it before the YellowMonkey did so I could have given you the barnbstar. What great work and photos Sarah. '''PS''' I have heard a rumour that the YellowMonkey has painted brown stripes onto his yellow fur so that he now looks like a Hawthorn supporter?-- +++$+++ *And I second that '''in bold''' and wish I had seen it before the YellowMonkey did so I could have given you the barnbstar. What great work and photos Sarah. '''PS''' I have heard a rumour that the YellowMonkey has painted brown stripes onto his yellow fur so that he now looks like a Hawthorn supporter?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 07:07, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
274844 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274842 +++$+++ 274843 +++$+++ 2008-09-29 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.222697580E09 +++$+++ The brown fur has been there since birth! ''' +++$+++ ::The brown fur has been there since birth! '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 07:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
274845 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274842 +++$+++ 274842 +++$+++ 2008-09-29 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.222705560E09 +++$+++ That's awesome, thank you very much, Monkey! :) I heard that rumour, too, Steve, but it was just a vicious lie being spread by the monkey gossip magazines because many monkeys are jealous that they have to go to the monkey stylist to get their fur coloured Hawthorn colours, but Monkey is a genuine original and needs no cosmetic enhancements! Monkey has very good genes. Hey, Steve, if you want to make yourself useful (!) see if you can identify any of these [[commons:User:Sarah_Ewart\/gallery|people]]! I would be very grateful if you recognised any of them! :)  +++$+++ :That's awesome, thank you very much, Monkey! :) I heard that rumour, too, Steve, but it was just a vicious lie being spread by the monkey gossip magazines because many monkeys are jealous that they have to go to the monkey stylist to get their fur coloured Hawthorn colours, but Monkey is a genuine original and needs no cosmetic enhancements! Monkey has very good genes. Hey, Steve, if you want to make yourself useful (!) see if you can identify any of these [[commons:User:Sarah_Ewart/gallery|people]]! I would be very grateful if you recognised any of them! :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
274846 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274842 +++$+++ 274845 +++$+++ 2008-10-01 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.222858560E09 +++$+++ I'll try to help - but most of them look like they have come from the [[Men in black]] sunglass store. ;)-- +++$+++ ::I'll try to help - but most of them look like they have come from the [[Men in black]] sunglass store. ;)--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 03:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
274847 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274842 +++$+++ 274846 +++$+++ 2008-10-02 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.222931700E09 +++$+++ [[Michael Diamond (sport shooter)]] = [[:Image:2008 Australian Olympic team 061 - Sarah Ewart.jpg]] Perhaps?-- +++$+++ ::*[[Michael Diamond (sport shooter)]] = [[:Image:2008 Australian Olympic team 061 - Sarah Ewart.jpg]] Perhaps?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 00:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
274848 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274842 +++$+++ 274847 +++$+++ 2008-10-02 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.222932360E09 +++$+++ Doubt it's Michael Diamond as the photo looks to be someone a little younger and his face is different[http:\/\/www.news.com.au\/couriermail\/story\/0,23739,23538361-10389,00.html].  +++$+++ :::*Doubt it's Michael Diamond as the photo looks to be someone a little younger and his face is different[http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,23538361-10389,00.html]. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 00:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
274849 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274842 +++$+++ 274845 +++$+++ 2008-10-02 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.222962060E09 +++$+++ It could be [[Matt Targett]] (who is a Vic), one of the sprint freestyle relay boys, although with the sunglasses it is a bit difficult. Also Diamond didnt win a medal this time and it would be a bit dubious to wheel out an old medal. ''' +++$+++ ::It could be [[Matt Targett]] (who is a Vic), one of the sprint freestyle relay boys, although with the sunglasses it is a bit difficult. Also Diamond didnt win a medal this time and it would be a bit dubious to wheel out an old medal. '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User talk:YellowMonkey#Straw_poll_for_selecting_photos_of_Australia_at_the_2008_Summer_Olympics|<font color="#FA8605">choose Australia's next top model</font>]]'') 08:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

536988 +++$+++ MatriX +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-08 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.147145940E09 +++$+++ Can you please take a look at the [[Bitola]] article? [[user:Telex|Telex]] has disrupted the hardly achieved compromise around that article and even inserted unsourced info that has really nothing with the name of the city. Now they are also destroying what I hardly achieved on the [[Macedonians (ethnic group)]] +++$+++ Can you please take a look at the [[Bitola]] article? [[user:Telex|Telex]] has disrupted the hardly achieved compromise around that article and even inserted unsourced info that has really nothing with the name of the city. Now they are also destroying what I hardly achieved on the [[Macedonians (ethnic group)]][[User:MatriX|MatriX]] 20:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
536989 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536988 +++$+++ 536988 +++$+++ 2006-05-08 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.147146120E09 +++$+++ How is it unsourced?I've cited the source, name of the author, book and even page. What sources were there before? Nothing. What exactly is unsourced? Your info is unsourced and is full of fact templates for a reason.  +++$+++ :How is it unsourced?I've cited the source, name of the author, book and even page. What sources were there before? Nothing. What exactly is unsourced? Your info is unsourced and is full of fact templates for a reason. [[User:Telex|Telex]] 20:42, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
536990 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536988 +++$+++ 536989 +++$+++ 2006-05-08 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.147146120E09 +++$+++ BTW, arbitrary edits over other people weeks of hard work just generate revert wars, you should know that by now.  +++$+++ ::BTW, arbitrary edits over other people weeks of hard work just generate revert wars, you should know that by now. [[User:Telex|Telex]] 20:42, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

12701 +++$+++ BrainyBabe +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.312588380E09 +++$+++ Hi Rivertorch, I don't think we've crossed paths before, but I wanted to congratulate you on your polite and restrained handling of [[User:Barbarahschultz]] and [[User:schultzbarbara]], here and on her\/their talkpages. I am attempting to do the same with another editor, [[User:Gerry Max]], who I see you have warned as well. Apparently they are both published authors who know each other IRL. I am having to commit emotional resources to [[WP:AGF|assuming good faith]] on his part, but am reiterating that I am willing to help any newcomer who wishes to learn. I admire your wording, and may borrow and repurpose it.  +++$+++ Hi Rivertorch, I don't think we've crossed paths before, but I wanted to congratulate you on your polite and restrained handling of [[User:Barbarahschultz]] and [[User:schultzbarbara]], here and on her/their talkpages. I am attempting to do the same with another editor, [[User:Gerry Max]], who I see you have warned as well. Apparently they are both published authors who know each other IRL. I am having to commit emotional resources to [[WP:AGF|assuming good faith]] on his part, but am reiterating that I am willing to help any newcomer who wishes to learn. I admire your wording, and may borrow and repurpose it. [[User:BrainyBabe|BrainyBabe]] ([[User talk:BrainyBabe|talk]]) 16:53, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
12702 +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ Rivertorch +++$+++ 12701 +++$+++ 12701 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312599240E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much for the kind words, BrainyBabe. In my experience, nothing makes AGF more difficult to follow than users who repeatedly decline to respond to messages on their talk pages, so I was pleased to see both of those editors finally engaging. Over the long haul, I'd like to see some sort of effort to better acquaint new or occasional users with the concept of talk pages\u2014what they're for, how they work, and so on. I've seen several users express surprise that no one had \"bothered\" to email them about problematic edits, and I wonder if this may be a widespread phenomenon. As for Schultz and Max, I'm on vacation and haven't been paying close attention for several days. I hope things have settled down.  +++$+++ :Thank you so much for the kind words, BrainyBabe. In my experience, nothing makes AGF more difficult to follow than users who repeatedly decline to respond to messages on their talk pages, so I was pleased to see both of those editors finally engaging. Over the long haul, I'd like to see some sort of effort to better acquaint new or occasional users with the concept of talk pages—what they're for, how they work, and so on. I've seen several users express surprise that no one had "bothered" to email them about problematic edits, and I wonder if this may be a widespread phenomenon. As for Schultz and Max, I'm on vacation and haven't been paying close attention for several days. I hope things have settled down. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch#top|talk]]) 19:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

536991 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-08 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.147156380E09 +++$+++ Hi, Aldux, I apologize if I've been a little too bad tempered lately. I'm sure you understand that it's to do with being reverted; I hate it when people do that, especially when it's by people like you who actually know something (if eg Vlatkoto reverted me, I wouldn't care less :p). I'll probably regret saying this in the future, but please continue reverting me if I make excruciatingly POV edits. Regards, -- +++$+++ Hi, Aldux, I apologize if I've been a little too bad tempered lately. I'm sure you understand that it's to do with being reverted; I hate it when people do that, especially when it's by people like you who actually know something (if eg Vlatkoto reverted me, I wouldn't care less :p). I'll probably regret saying this in the future, but please continue reverting me if I make excruciatingly POV edits. Regards, --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 23:33, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
536992 +++$+++ Politis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536991 +++$+++ 536991 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.147211520E09 +++$+++ You are right, Accepted is more appropriate than Adopted. I also agree with 'former' rather than 'Former' because that is how it was mentioned in UN resolution 817 [[http:\/\/daccessdds.un.org\/doc\/UNDOC\/GEN\/N93\/203\/74\/IMG\/N9320374.pdf?OpenElement]].  +++$+++ :You are right, Accepted is more appropriate than Adopted. I also agree with 'former' rather than 'Former' because that is how it was mentioned in UN resolution 817 [[http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N93/203/74/IMG/N9320374.pdf?OpenElement]]. [[User:Politis|Politis]] 14:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

12704 +++$+++ TreasuryTag +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ 12704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-13 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.276444800E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue removing [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for deletion]] notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with [[:File:The Time of Angels illustrative image.jpg]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-afd3 --> <font color=\"#FFB911\">\u255f\u2500 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue removing [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for deletion]] notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with [[:File:The Time of Angels illustrative image.jpg]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-afd3 --> <font color="#FFB911">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">without portfolio</span>]]─╢</font> 09:00, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
12705 +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ 12704 +++$+++ 12704 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.276445700E09 +++$+++ You had already been denied the deletion once, perhaps it is YOU who should play by the rules?  +++$+++ :You had already been denied the deletion once, perhaps it is YOU who should play by the rules? [[User:Briantist|<span style="background-color:#841818; border-top: 1px solid #AD3031; border-bottom: 1px solid #5A1810; color:#EFEBDE">'''&nbsp;BRIANTIST&nbsp;'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Briantist|''(talk)'']] 09:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
12706 +++$+++ TreasuryTag +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ 12704 +++$+++ 12705 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.276445880E09 +++$+++ The rule is that '''you are not allowed to remove {{tl|ifd}} tags or other deletion notices''' \u2013 that is not complicated, and if you continue to do so, you ''will'' be blocked from editing. <font color=\"#7026DF\">\u255f\u2500 +++$+++ ::The rule is that '''you are not allowed to remove {{tl|ifd}} tags or other deletion notices''' – that is not complicated, and if you continue to do so, you ''will'' be blocked from editing. <font color="#7026DF">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">cabinet</span>]]─╢</font> 09:18, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
12707 +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ 12704 +++$+++ 12706 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.276446000E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but you seem to apply rules only to others.  Can you point me to where I can report you?  Thanks  +++$+++ :::I'm sorry, but you seem to apply rules only to others.  Can you point me to where I can report you?  Thanks [[User:Briantist|<span style="background-color:#841818; border-top: 1px solid #AD3031; border-bottom: 1px solid #5A1810; color:#EFEBDE">'''&nbsp;BRIANTIST&nbsp;'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Briantist|''(talk)'']] 09:20, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
12708 +++$+++ TreasuryTag +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ 12704 +++$+++ 12707 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.276446060E09 +++$+++ Certainly. You may report me at [[WP:ANI|the administrators' noticeboard]], though I suggest you don't, because in this case, you are in the wrong. <font color=\"#C4112F\">\u255f\u2500 +++$+++ ::::Certainly. You may report me at [[WP:ANI|the administrators' noticeboard]], though I suggest you don't, because in this case, you are in the wrong. <font color="#C4112F">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">constablewick</span>]]─╢</font> 09:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
12709 +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ 12704 +++$+++ 12708 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.276446660E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I have made it known.   +++$+++ :::::Thanks, I have made it known.  [[User:Briantist|<span style="background-color:#841818; border-top: 1px solid #AD3031; border-bottom: 1px solid #5A1810; color:#EFEBDE">'''&nbsp;BRIANTIST&nbsp;'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Briantist|''(talk)'']] 09:31, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

439024 +++$+++ ExplorerCDT +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-27 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.164615000E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I've also appreciated your work on this, colonial colleges, ivy league and a few academic-related other articles I try to keep an eye on.  You usually beat me to the punch on correcting or reverting with the [[Ivy League]] article. &mdash; +++$+++ Thanks. I've also appreciated your work on this, colonial colleges, ivy league and a few academic-related other articles I try to keep an eye on.  You usually beat me to the punch on correcting or reverting with the [[Ivy League]] article. &mdash;[[User:ExplorerCDT|ExplorerCDT]] 00:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
439025 +++$+++ ExplorerCDT +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439024 +++$+++ 439024 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164886440E09 +++$+++ Which? Felician? DeVry? Fairleigh Dickinson? Seton Hall?...  Or that community college a few miles south of ol' Rutgers on Route 27? (kidding) &mdash; +++$+++ :Which? Felician? DeVry? Fairleigh Dickinson? Seton Hall?...  Or that community college a few miles south of ol' Rutgers on Route 27? (kidding) &mdash;[[User:ExplorerCDT|ExplorerCDT]] 03:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

536994 +++$+++ Realek +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-09 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.147166040E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Realek|Realek]] 02:14, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
536995 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536994 +++$+++ 536994 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.147189920E09 +++$+++ We too.  +++$+++ :We too. [[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#777">&nbsp;<span style="background:#888">N<span style="background:#999">i<span style="background:#aaa">k<span style="background:#bbb">o<span style="background:#ccc"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 08:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
536996 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536994 +++$+++ 536995 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.147192080E09 +++$+++ It does not imply that they are a seperate ethnic group. On a second tone, it's not the evil Graeco-Bulgarian requiring the sources, it's Wikipedia [[WP:V|policy]], so if you want to work without citing sources, I suggest you start a wiki of your own (call it Realekpedia). BTW, yes, even in Macedonian nationalism, there was some confusion over over the alleged ethnicity of the Macedonians at that time. According to Macedonian nationalists, the [[Miladinov Brothers]], who wrote what they called ''Bulgarian'' folk songs, in what they described as the ''Bulgarian'' languages, really meant ''Macedonian'', just there was some ethnic confusion at that time. As for your claim that we should believe your assertions about the self identification of your gradparents, I'll respond with your own [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Macedonian_language&diff=prev&oldid=50793912 words]: ''Why should anybody belive you??? Just because you say so??? Shouldn't people take into account your obvious bias???''  +++$+++ ::It does not imply that they are a seperate ethnic group. On a second tone, it's not the evil Graeco-Bulgarian requiring the sources, it's Wikipedia [[WP:V|policy]], so if you want to work without citing sources, I suggest you start a wiki of your own (call it Realekpedia). BTW, yes, even in Macedonian nationalism, there was some confusion over over the alleged ethnicity of the Macedonians at that time. According to Macedonian nationalists, the [[Miladinov Brothers]], who wrote what they called ''Bulgarian'' folk songs, in what they described as the ''Bulgarian'' languages, really meant ''Macedonian'', just there was some ethnic confusion at that time. As for your claim that we should believe your assertions about the self identification of your gradparents, I'll respond with your own [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Macedonian_language&diff=prev&oldid=50793912 words]: ''Why should anybody belive you??? Just because you say so??? Shouldn't people take into account your obvious bias???'' [[User:Telex|Telex]] 09:28, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
536997 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536994 +++$+++ 536996 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.147192920E09 +++$+++ I maintain my previous position. +++$+++ :::I maintain my previous position.[[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#777">&nbsp;<span style="background:#888">N<span style="background:#999">i<span style="background:#aaa">k<span style="background:#bbb">o<span style="background:#ccc"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 09:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
536998 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536994 +++$+++ 536997 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.147210440E09 +++$+++ Ciao Al, puoi spiegarmi perche hai fatto [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Macedonian_language&curid=19037&diff=52310148&oldid=52296746 questo] (solo di curiosita, perche non capisco la differenza). +++$+++ ::::Ciao Al, puoi spiegarmi perche hai fatto [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Macedonian_language&curid=19037&diff=52310148&oldid=52296746 questo] (solo di curiosita, perche non capisco la differenza).[[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#777">&nbsp;<span style="background:#888">N<span style="background:#999">i<span style="background:#aaa">k<span style="background:#bbb">o<span style="background:#ccc"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 14:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
536999 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536994 +++$+++ 536998 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.147210680E09 +++$+++ Io penso che gli esempi siano utili.  +++$+++ :::::Io penso che gli esempi siano utili. [[User:Telex|Telex]] 14:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
537000 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536994 +++$+++ 536999 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.147211040E09 +++$+++ Ah si? Perche? (sinceramente NON SO!)  +++$+++ ::::::Ah si? Perche? (sinceramente NON SO!) [[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#777">&nbsp;<span style="background:#888">N<span style="background:#999">i<span style="background:#aaa">k<span style="background:#bbb">o<span style="background:#ccc"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 14:44, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
537001 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536994 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.147211520E09 +++$+++ Didn't you (Niko) ask me a question about the distant definite article at [[Talk:FYROM]]? That's why.  +++$+++ ::::::::Didn't you (Niko) ask me a question about the distant definite article at [[Talk:FYROM]]? That's why. [[User:Telex|Telex]] 14:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
537002 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 536994 +++$+++ 537000 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.147211460E09 +++$+++ They were removed following a stupid error on my part, that I've now corrected. I probably gave a look to a wrong version. It may be all crap, but I don't have enough knowledge of the issue to decide this.-- +++$+++ :::::::They were removed following a stupid error on my part, that I've now corrected. I probably gave a look to a wrong version. It may be all crap, but I don't have enough knowledge of the issue to decide this.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 14:51, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

274852 +++$+++ Matilda +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274852 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-02 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.222957500E09 +++$+++ Hi - the media file was posted by Durova (but it seems she didn't sign) - and I followed up with her on her talk page as to what she meant as it was altogether a bit cryptic.  The reason for citing Griffith Uni was just as an external reliable source as to copyright on emails.  There is no link to the arbcom decision at WP:Harrass and the question had arisen whether that should be reviewed.  While I fully respect the arbcom decision - to my mind the law on copyright actually has more weight. Regards  +++$+++ Hi - the media file was posted by Durova (but it seems she didn't sign) - and I followed up with her on her talk page as to what she meant as it was altogether a bit cryptic.  The reason for citing Griffith Uni was just as an external reliable source as to copyright on emails.  There is no link to the arbcom decision at WP:Harrass and the question had arisen whether that should be reviewed.  While I fully respect the arbcom decision - to my mind the law on copyright actually has more weight. Regards [[User:Matilda|Matilda]] <sup>[[User_talk:Matilda|talk]]</sup> 07:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
274853 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274852 +++$+++ 274852 +++$+++ 2008-10-02 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.222984500E09 +++$+++ Okay thanks for letting me know. We should probably add an unsigned tag because that media file slapped there with no sig and no comment is very strange and confusing. I understand your point about copyright, but I just don't want to see that discussion continue going off on a tangent. It seems more important at this stage, IMHO, to try to keep the discussion focused on the validity of the block rather than the perennial issue of posting emails and copyright, which will no doubt devolve again into discussion about the location of the servers and such. I think for the sake of the main people involved, i.e. Steve, Sandstein and Gene, it's much more important to try to focus on the blocks and to try to encourage the community to discuss it and reach a consensus regarding Gene's long term problematic behaviour. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC) I just read your discussion with Durova, and I'm rather confused by the whole thing and where anyone is getting the idea that people think that consensus can override copyright law (or any law, for that matter). If that's the impression of my comments, then it is a mistaken impression because I don't think that at all. I just think that we don't need to start discussing and debating law because things are far more simplistic and straightforward. ArbCom passed findings that private emails should not be posted without the author's consent and if they are posted then they can be removed by any administrator. Therefore, emails shouldn't be posted without the author's consent and  if they are posted in this way then they can be removed by any administrator. The whole thing seems like an unnecessary tangent and I really do believe that it is more important to focus the discussion on the block ad trying to reach a consensus about that. It's really not good to leave up in the air a block that has been contested by another administrator, especially when there's an unresolved and unaddressed objection like George's there on ANI and elsewhere.  +++$+++ :Okay thanks for letting me know. We should probably add an unsigned tag because that media file slapped there with no sig and no comment is very strange and confusing. I understand your point about copyright, but I just don't want to see that discussion continue going off on a tangent. It seems more important at this stage, IMHO, to try to keep the discussion focused on the validity of the block rather than the perennial issue of posting emails and copyright, which will no doubt devolve again into discussion about the location of the servers and such. I think for the sake of the main people involved, i.e. Steve, Sandstein and Gene, it's much more important to try to focus on the blocks and to try to encourage the community to discuss it and reach a consensus regarding Gene's long term problematic behaviour. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC) I just read your discussion with Durova, and I'm rather confused by the whole thing and where anyone is getting the idea that people think that consensus can override copyright law (or any law, for that matter). If that's the impression of my comments, then it is a mistaken impression because I don't think that at all. I just think that we don't need to start discussing and debating law because things are far more simplistic and straightforward. ArbCom passed findings that private emails should not be posted without the author's consent and if they are posted then they can be removed by any administrator. Therefore, emails shouldn't be posted without the author's consent and  if they are posted in this way then they can be removed by any administrator. The whole thing seems like an unnecessary tangent and I really do believe that it is more important to focus the discussion on the block ad trying to reach a consensus about that. It's really not good to leave up in the air a block that has been contested by another administrator, especially when there's an unresolved and unaddressed objection like George's there on ANI and elsewhere. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
274854 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274852 +++$+++ 274853 +++$+++ 2008-10-02 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.222987020E09 +++$+++ Sarah, I apologize for introducing the tangent.  The thing is, the [[WP:HA]] policy is confusing (and ambiguous) because it says there is no consensus for or against posting e-mail merely because other such policies have been rejected.  Durova may or may not have misread this because it could be interpreted (implicitly) to mean what she says.  Anyhoo, any chance you can take a look at [[WP:HA]] and fix the wording?  As it is currently reading, it makes it seem like it is ok to post e-mail.  As for Gene, I'm concerned that he doesn't understand [[WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND]], but I don't know exactly know how to bring it up with him.  Maybe the long break will do him good?  +++$+++ ::Sarah, I apologize for introducing the tangent.  The thing is, the [[WP:HA]] policy is confusing (and ambiguous) because it says there is no consensus for or against posting e-mail merely because other such policies have been rejected.  Durova may or may not have misread this because it could be interpreted (implicitly) to mean what she says.  Anyhoo, any chance you can take a look at [[WP:HA]] and fix the wording?  As it is currently reading, it makes it seem like it is ok to post e-mail.  As for Gene, I'm concerned that he doesn't understand [[WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND]], but I don't know exactly know how to bring it up with him.  Maybe the long break will do him good? [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 15:37, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
274855 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274852 +++$+++ 274854 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.223363460E09 +++$+++ No need to apologise, Viri. I've made some changes to the HAR policy page. [[Wikipedia:Harassment#Private_correspondence]] Let's see if they get reverted or not. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC) PS Sorry for the delay replying, just pretty busy IRL. :)  +++$+++ :::No need to apologise, Viri. I've made some changes to the HAR policy page. [[Wikipedia:Harassment#Private_correspondence]] Let's see if they get reverted or not. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC) PS Sorry for the delay replying, just pretty busy IRL. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
274856 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274852 +++$+++ 274855 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.223363820E09 +++$+++ Thanks again. :)  +++$+++ ::::Thanks again. :) [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 00:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
274857 +++$+++ Matilda +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274852 +++$+++ 274852 +++$+++ 2008-10-02 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.223003400E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah - I agree with the points you made.  I not only support VS's block - I was pleased he made it.  I would like to see a more robust attitude to upholding civility principles on wikipedia.  Gene was very rude to 3 editors myslef included (+Bidgee and Michelle Crisp) - later to Steve.  The issue about emails came up - and it needs to be cleaned up as per Viriditas so that everybody is not under some misapprehension.  Separate issue though.  Thanks -- +++$+++ *Thanks Sarah - I agree with the points you made.  I not only support VS's block - I was pleased he made it.  I would like to see a more robust attitude to upholding civility principles on wikipedia.  Gene was very rude to 3 editors myslef included (+Bidgee and Michelle Crisp) - later to Steve.  The issue about emails came up - and it needs to be cleaned up as per Viriditas so that everybody is not under some misapprehension.  Separate issue though.  Thanks --[[User:Matilda|Matilda]] <sup>[[User_talk:Matilda|talk]]</sup> 20:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

12711 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ 12711 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-16 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.276725540E09 +++$+++ [[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px]][[Template:H2G2]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:H2G2|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice-->  +++$+++ [[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px]][[Template:H2G2]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:H2G2|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 14:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
12712 +++$+++ HairyWombat +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ 12711 +++$+++ 12711 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.276736340E09 +++$+++ It is obviously up to you if you respond and how, but you might want to describe the state the articles were in before the template was used.  +++$+++ : It is obviously up to you if you respond and how, but you might want to describe the state the articles were in before the template was used. [[User:HairyWombat|HairyWombat]] ([[User talk:HairyWombat|talk]]) 17:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
12713 +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ Briantist +++$+++ 12711 +++$+++ 12712 +++$+++ 2010-07-26 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.280190120E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to say thanks for your work on the script.  +++$+++ :: Just wanted to say thanks for your work on the script. [[User:Briantist|<span style="background-color:#841818; border-top: 1px solid #AD3031; border-bottom: 1px solid #5A1810; color:#EFEBDE">'''&nbsp;BRIANTIST&nbsp;'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Briantist|''(talk)'']] 17:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

611456 +++$+++ Syrthiss +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611456 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-01 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.301706420E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|guidelines]] for new pages, so it will shortly be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|removed]] (if it hasn't been already). Please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for any tests, and consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]]. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read [[Wikipedia:Your first article|Your first article]]. You may also want to read our [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction page]] to learn more about contributing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-create1 -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|guidelines]] for new pages, so it will shortly be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|removed]] (if it hasn't been already). Please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for any tests, and consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]]. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read [[Wikipedia:Your first article|Your first article]]. You may also want to read our [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction page]] to learn more about contributing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-create1 --> [[User:Syrthiss|Syrthiss]] ([[User talk:Syrthiss|talk]]) 18:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
611457 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611456 +++$+++ 611456 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.301706540E09 +++$+++ It was a joke!  +++$+++ :It was a joke! [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 18:09, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
611458 +++$+++ Syrthiss +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611456 +++$+++ 611457 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.301943600E09 +++$+++ ;)  +++$+++ :: ;) [[User:Syrthiss|Syrthiss]] ([[User talk:Syrthiss|talk]]) 12:00, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

274859 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274859 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-08 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.223462700E09 +++$+++ Now no one has a source to the fact the Marco was a Hurricane\/Tropical Cyclone strength system other then sourcing a warning from the NOAA and a source about Cyclone Tracy which states nothing about Marco. I've had editors trting to use the Tropical Cyclone article as a source that a Tropical Storm is a Hurricane\/Tropical Cyclone when they can't explain anything why they think that it is when I have [[Talk:Tropical_Storm_Marco_(2008)#Smallest_record_claim|here]]. The only source I could find was an NOAA warning that said it could be the smallest system but it's no longer available and ''could be'' doesn't make it fact anyway and the only other sources are forums which are not classed as reliable. I feel the anything in the article stating that it's the smallest should be left out until it can be proven with [[WP:V|verifiable]] and [[WP:RS|reliable sources]].  +++$+++ Now no one has a source to the fact the Marco was a Hurricane/Tropical Cyclone strength system other then sourcing a warning from the NOAA and a source about Cyclone Tracy which states nothing about Marco. I've had editors trting to use the Tropical Cyclone article as a source that a Tropical Storm is a Hurricane/Tropical Cyclone when they can't explain anything why they think that it is when I have [[Talk:Tropical_Storm_Marco_(2008)#Smallest_record_claim|here]]. The only source I could find was an NOAA warning that said it could be the smallest system but it's no longer available and ''could be'' doesn't make it fact anyway and the only other sources are forums which are not classed as reliable. I feel the anything in the article stating that it's the smallest should be left out until it can be proven with [[WP:V|verifiable]] and [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 03:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
274860 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274859 +++$+++ 274859 +++$+++ 2008-10-09 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.223619780E09 +++$+++ I had a look but it seems to be resolved now?  +++$+++ :I had a look but it seems to be resolved now? [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 23:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

274862 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274862 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-15 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.224092580E09 +++$+++ I'm posting here to avoid creating a tangent on ANI, a page that is already too large.  The article [[Cynna Kydd]] seems to have had an image[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Cynna_Kydd&direction=prev&oldid=70859541] at times in the past. It even received criticism at FAC due to the image.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/Cynna_Kydd&diff=34185620&oldid=34178468] You might have a look, the article currently has a citation needed tag [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cynna_Kydd#Early_life here].  +++$+++ I'm posting here to avoid creating a tangent on ANI, a page that is already too large.  The article [[Cynna Kydd]] seems to have had an image[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cynna_Kydd&direction=prev&oldid=70859541] at times in the past. It even received criticism at FAC due to the image.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Cynna_Kydd&diff=34185620&oldid=34178468] You might have a look, the article currently has a citation needed tag [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynna_Kydd#Early_life here]. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 10:43, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
274863 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274862 +++$+++ 274862 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.224136140E09 +++$+++ Noted, but it still meets the criteria of a FA without images. As does [[USA PATRIOT Act, Title III, Subtitle A]], which has no images now and had none at the time it was featured [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=USA_PATRIOT_Act,_Title_III,_Subtitle_A&oldid=51161910].  +++$+++ :Noted, but it still meets the criteria of a FA without images. As does [[USA PATRIOT Act, Title III, Subtitle A]], which has no images now and had none at the time it was featured [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USA_PATRIOT_Act,_Title_III,_Subtitle_A&oldid=51161910]. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 22:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
274864 +++$+++ Albatross2147 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274862 +++$+++ 274862 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.225217940E09 +++$+++ what a great shot of the little ....!  +++$+++ * what a great shot of the little ....! [[User:Albatross2147|Albatross2147]] ([[User talk:Albatross2147|talk]]) 11:19, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
274865 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274862 +++$+++ 274864 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.225275600E09 +++$+++ Heh, thanks. I was right at the back of Federation Square with a hand held 500mm lens so it was a matter of hit or miss. :)  +++$+++ ::Heh, thanks. I was right at the back of Federation Square with a hand held 500mm lens so it was a matter of hit or miss. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

274867 +++$+++ MichaelBillington +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-26 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.225034640E09 +++$+++ Re [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:MichaelBillington&diff=247289106&oldid=247280119]. Much appreciated. :) -- +++$+++ Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:MichaelBillington&diff=247289106&oldid=247280119]. Much appreciated. :) --[[User:MichaelBillington|Michael Billington]] ([[User talk:MichaelBillington|talk]]) 08:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
274868 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274867 +++$+++ 274867 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 08:45:00 +++$+++ 1.225208700E09 +++$+++ No worries, Michael. Must admit, I had to think for a moment whether I really wanted to revert for a Colliewobble fan. :D Hope your studies are going well and good luck with the exams. Cheers,  +++$+++ :No worries, Michael. Must admit, I had to think for a moment whether I really wanted to revert for a Colliewobble fan. :D Hope your studies are going well and good luck with the exams. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

274869 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274869 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-12 09:36:00 +++$+++ 1.226511360E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, as the result of a gentle rollback I performed on the article [[Galah, Victoria]] a friendly discussion has ensued [[User_talk:VirtualSteve#Galah.2C_Victoria_redirect|here]].  Whilst it may not ultimately be the best location for such a communication to fully develop, for now, if you have the time and\/or interest, can you provide your thoughts also? With thanks. -- +++$+++ Hi Sarah, as the result of a gentle rollback I performed on the article [[Galah, Victoria]] a friendly discussion has ensued [[User_talk:VirtualSteve#Galah.2C_Victoria_redirect|here]].  Whilst it may not ultimately be the best location for such a communication to fully develop, for now, if you have the time and/or interest, can you provide your thoughts also? With thanks. --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 09:36, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
274870 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274869 +++$+++ 274869 +++$+++ 2008-11-12 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.226532060E09 +++$+++ Greetings Mr Steve, pleased to hear from you. :) I'd be most happy to take a look at the discussion but I probably won't have a chance to do so until tomorrow morning. By the way, I hope you didn't mind me butting in on the whole Daniel Coursey discussion. I just saw your talk page on my watchlist when he edited your page and I had a look at it as well so he would know that two admins reviewed it and agreed it was an A 7. I didn't mean to interfere with your activites, though, so I hope it didn't feel like that. I hope all is well with you. All the best, my friend.  +++$+++ :Greetings Mr Steve, pleased to hear from you. :) I'd be most happy to take a look at the discussion but I probably won't have a chance to do so until tomorrow morning. By the way, I hope you didn't mind me butting in on the whole Daniel Coursey discussion. I just saw your talk page on my watchlist when he edited your page and I had a look at it as well so he would know that two admins reviewed it and agreed it was an A 7. I didn't mean to interfere with your activites, though, so I hope it didn't feel like that. I hope all is well with you. All the best, my friend. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 15:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
274871 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274869 +++$+++ 274870 +++$+++ 2008-11-12 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.226559660E09 +++$+++ Well now Ms Sarah, you know you are always welcome on my talk page and your comments are never thought of as butting in.  Besides your comment seems to have settled the matter as I have had no return from that editor regarding my offer of help. Speak again soon.-- +++$+++ ::Well now Ms Sarah, you know you are always welcome on my talk page and your comments are never thought of as butting in.  Besides your comment seems to have settled the matter as I have had no return from that editor regarding my offer of help. Speak again soon.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 23:01, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

537014 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-20 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.148184960E09 +++$+++ Hello. I've noticed you're working on a major rewrite of [[Pomaks]]. It seems like the article corresponds to the article [[Muslim Bulgarians]] (''Pomaks'' is just a local\/informal\/derogatory name) and I believe we should merge them, but would like to know what you think first. I'm interested in this quite vague and sometimes controversial topic and would like to help create a good, neutral and unbiased article. Also, we should settle on some transliteration \u2014 whether the [[Romanization of Bulgarian|official one]] or [[scientific transliteration]]. The second is more accurate while the first one is... official :) [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]]  +++$+++ Hello. I've noticed you're working on a major rewrite of [[Pomaks]]. It seems like the article corresponds to the article [[Muslim Bulgarians]] (''Pomaks'' is just a local/informal/derogatory name) and I believe we should merge them, but would like to know what you think first. I'm interested in this quite vague and sometimes controversial topic and would like to help create a good, neutral and unbiased article. Also, we should settle on some transliteration — whether the [[Romanization of Bulgarian|official one]] or [[scientific transliteration]]. The second is more accurate while the first one is... official :) [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]] [[User:TodorBozhinov|→ Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov]] [[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]] 21:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
537015 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537014 +++$+++ 537014 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.148186400E09 +++$+++ That's all right, I only meant making them one article and didn't intend to imply ''Muslim Bulgarians'' is a better name \u2014 as you said, it isn't. The article(s) and the topic really need major work and good referencing, so what you've assigned to yourself is an important task. Count on me for any help I could offer. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]]  +++$+++ : That's all right, I only meant making them one article and didn't intend to imply ''Muslim Bulgarians'' is a better name — as you said, it isn't. The article(s) and the topic really need major work and good referencing, so what you've assigned to yourself is an important task. Count on me for any help I could offer. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]] [[User:TodorBozhinov|→ Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov]] [[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]] 21:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

12728 +++$+++ Acdixon +++$+++ Christopher Parham +++$+++ 12728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-08 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.260313920E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the long delay in responding to your comments on my [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Edwin P. Morrow\/archive1|FA nom of Edwin P. Morrow]]. I was out of town for several days last week. I have now made some changes that I hope address your concerns. Please see if you feel these changes are sufficient to strike the remaining issues you have raised. Thank you. <span id=\"Acdixon\" class=\"plainlinks\" style=\"color:#002bb8\"> +++$+++ Sorry for the long delay in responding to your comments on my [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Edwin P. Morrow/archive1|FA nom of Edwin P. Morrow]]. I was out of town for several days last week. I have now made some changes that I hope address your concerns. Please see if you feel these changes are sufficient to strike the remaining issues you have raised. Thank you. <span id="Acdixon" class="plainlinks" style="color:#002bb8">[[User:Acdixon|Acdixon]] <sup>([[User talk:Acdixon|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Acdixon|contribs]] <small>•</small> [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name={{urlencode:Acdixon}}&wiki=wikipedia&lang=en  <span style="color:#002bb8">count</span>])</span></sup> 15:12, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
12729 +++$+++ Acdixon +++$+++ Christopher Parham +++$+++ 12728 +++$+++ 12728 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.260848520E09 +++$+++ No problem. I thought the added paragraph should address your concerns, but I always like to check. <span id=\"Acdixon\" class=\"plainlinks\" style=\"color:#002bb8\"> +++$+++ :No problem. I thought the added paragraph should address your concerns, but I always like to check. <span id="Acdixon" class="plainlinks" style="color:#002bb8">[[User:Acdixon|Acdixon]] <sup>([[User talk:Acdixon|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Acdixon|contribs]] <small>•</small> [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name={{urlencode:Acdixon}}&wiki=wikipedia&lang=en  <span style="color:#002bb8">count</span>])</span></sup> 19:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

12730 +++$+++ Jusdafax +++$+++ Christopher Parham +++$+++ 12730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-23 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.261556460E09 +++$+++ re: a 'Motion to close', which would dissolve Cda as a proposal. The motion includes an !vote.  You have previously commented at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Administrator]].  +++$+++ re: a 'Motion to close', which would dissolve Cda as a proposal. The motion includes an !vote.  You have previously commented at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Administrator]]. [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]] 00:21, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
12731 +++$+++ Matt Lewis +++$+++ Christopher Parham +++$+++ 12730 +++$+++ 12730 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.263807720E09 +++$+++ ascertain whether there is support for a 'two-phase' poll at the eventual RfC (not far off now), where CDA will finally be put to the community.  +++$+++ * ascertain whether there is support for a 'two-phase' poll at the eventual RfC (not far off now), where CDA will finally be put to the community. [[User:Matt Lewis|Matt Lewis]] ([[User talk:Matt Lewis|talk]]) 01:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

12732 +++$+++ TParis00ap +++$+++ Christopher Parham +++$+++ 12732 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-20 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.264048500E09 +++$+++ --v\/r -  +++$+++ --v/r - [[User:TParis00ap|T]][[User_talk:TParis00ap|P]] 20:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
12733 +++$+++ Dream Focus  +++$+++ Christopher Parham +++$+++ 12732 +++$+++ 12732 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.265633400E09 +++$+++ I am contacting everyone who participated in the previous AFD to inform them the same exact article is up for deletion again. [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/List_of_The_Simpsons_couch_gags_(2nd_nomination)#List_of_The_Simpsons_couch_gags]]  +++$+++ *I am contacting everyone who participated in the previous AFD to inform them the same exact article is up for deletion again. [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_The_Simpsons_couch_gags_(2nd_nomination)#List_of_The_Simpsons_couch_gags]] [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>]]''' 04:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

537021 +++$+++ Apostolos Margaritis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-24 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.148519100E09 +++$+++ Basta colla tua grecofilia tendenzionista! Ai capito bene? +++$+++ Basta colla tua grecofilia tendenzionista! Ai capito bene?[[User:Apostolos Margaritis|Apostolos Margaritis]] 18:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
537022 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.148532540E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux! Margaritis has already made up his mind [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Dahn&diff=prev&oldid=54923970]. -- +++$+++ :Hi Aldux! Margaritis has already made up his mind [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dahn&diff=prev&oldid=54923970]. --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 21:49, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
537023 +++$+++ Apostolos Margaritis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.148578320E09 +++$+++ See Hectorian, me and Dahn much as we share the same ethnic background do NOT necessarily support each other. I think that's rather elegant, fair and in the spirit of wikipedia. Sadly you Greeks are grouping yourselves on ethnic lines so to speak. As I once said, you're still stunted, need to grow up. I would very much suggest you try to grow a bit more sophisticated and becomeless obsessed by your own ethnic background  +++$+++ :::See Hectorian, me and Dahn much as we share the same ethnic background do NOT necessarily support each other. I think that's rather elegant, fair and in the spirit of wikipedia. Sadly you Greeks are grouping yourselves on ethnic lines so to speak. As I once said, you're still stunted, need to grow up. I would very much suggest you try to grow a bit more sophisticated and becomeless obsessed by your own ethnic background [[User:Apostolos Margaritis|Apostolos Margaritis]] 10:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537024 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-27 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.148716920E09 +++$+++ Minor correction: ''See Hectorian, me and Dahn much as we '''want to believe we''' share the same ethnic background do NOT necessarily support each other.''... I am not obsessed with my ethnic background... someone else seems to be... -- +++$+++ ::::Minor correction: ''See Hectorian, me and Dahn much as we '''want to believe we''' share the same ethnic background do NOT necessarily support each other.''... I am not obsessed with my ethnic background... someone else seems to be... --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 01:02, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
537025 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.148578500E09 +++$+++ What common ethnicity do you have with Dahn? As far as I know [[Aromanians]] = [[Greeks]]. -- +++$+++ ::::What common ethnicity do you have with Dahn? As far as I know [[Aromanians]] = [[Greeks]]. --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 10:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537026 +++$+++ Apostolos Margaritis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.148578800E09 +++$+++ Oh yes and pigs fly. Hey I'm in an excellent mood today so you won't drag me into the Vlach [[quagmire]] again.  +++$+++ ::::Oh yes and pigs fly. Hey I'm in an excellent mood today so you won't drag me into the Vlach [[quagmire]] again. [[User:Apostolos Margaritis|Apostolos Margaritis]] 10:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537027 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537022 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.148537040E09 +++$+++ I thought you only suffered from gynaikophilia... +++$+++ ::I thought you only suffered from gynaikophilia...[[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#778">&nbsp;<span style="background:#889">N<span style="background:#99a">i<span style="background:#aab">k<span style="background:#bbc">o<span style="background:#ccd"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 23:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
537028 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537027 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.148537700E09 +++$+++ Say it in Italian, NikoSilver (as Margaritis also did): bambolaphilia...:)-- +++$+++ :::Say it in Italian, NikoSilver (as Margaritis also did): bambolaphilia...:)--[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 23:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
537029 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537028 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.148540100E09 +++$+++ No, he said it in a self-invented [[Romanian language|Romano]]-[[Italian language|Italian]] [[portmanteu]]... +++$+++ ::::No, he said it in a self-invented [[Romanian language|Romano]]-[[Italian language|Italian]] [[portmanteu]]...[[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#778">&nbsp;<span style="background:#889">N<span style="background:#99a">i<span style="background:#aab">k<span style="background:#bbc">o<span style="background:#ccd"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 23:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
537030 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537029 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.148540400E09 +++$+++ OK, i just tried to edit something clever, don't shoot me! (and to show i know some Italian-...vanitas vanitatis....u know:)...) -- +++$+++ :::::OK, i just tried to edit something clever, don't shoot me! (and to show i know some Italian-...vanitas vanitatis....u know:)...) --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 00:00, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537031 +++$+++ Apostolos Margaritis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537028 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.148577840E09 +++$+++ Ela re patriotes. It's really depressing to see a) Greeks decorating each other (Latinus lavishing NikoSilver and Hectorian with medals, Telex awarding medals to Matia.gr: you name them) yes we know [[Cyprus]] and [[Greece]] failing to achieve [[Enosis]] always award each other 20 points at Eurovision b) Greeks never ever daring to argue with one another: again, probably from a misunderstood sense of a monolithic patriotism. You're in fact quite similar to a pack of [[wolf]]s. Coward when on your own always brave when walk in packs. Not to worry, now I am here so I can guarantee you there's lot of fun to be had.  +++$+++ ::::Ela re patriotes. It's really depressing to see a) Greeks decorating each other (Latinus lavishing NikoSilver and Hectorian with medals, Telex awarding medals to Matia.gr: you name them) yes we know [[Cyprus]] and [[Greece]] failing to achieve [[Enosis]] always award each other 20 points at Eurovision b) Greeks never ever daring to argue with one another: again, probably from a misunderstood sense of a monolithic patriotism. You're in fact quite similar to a pack of [[wolf]]s. Coward when on your own always brave when walk in packs. Not to worry, now I am here so I can guarantee you there's lot of fun to be had. [[User:Apostolos Margaritis|Apostolos Margaritis]] 10:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537032 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537030 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.148578140E09 +++$+++ Woof. -- +++$+++ ::::::Woof. --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 10:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537033 +++$+++ Apostolos Margaritis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.148578620E09 +++$+++ Is there a [[new moon]] where you are right now triggering those wolf chants of yours Telex? +++$+++ ::::::::Is there a [[new moon]] where you are right now triggering those wolf chants of yours Telex?[[User:Apostolos Margaritis|Apostolos Margaritis]] 10:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537034 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537031 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.148578980E09 +++$+++ Who did you vote for at the Eurovision, Greece? -- +++$+++ :::::Who did you vote for at the Eurovision, Greece? --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 10:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537035 +++$+++ Apostolos Margaritis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537031 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.148579580E09 +++$+++ Saturday evening I've been munching [[sushi]] and beef katsu until late at [[Nobu]]. By the time I arrived home it was too late to see the aging diva [[Anna Vissi]] (is that her name?). But I caught a glimpse of [[Nana Mouskouri]] though. Someone stop her, please, please was begging on the BBC the presenter [[Terry Wogan]]. Of course I didn't bother to vote for the [[Eurotrash]] contest  +++$+++ :::::Saturday evening I've been munching [[sushi]] and beef katsu until late at [[Nobu]]. By the time I arrived home it was too late to see the aging diva [[Anna Vissi]] (is that her name?). But I caught a glimpse of [[Nana Mouskouri]] though. Someone stop her, please, please was begging on the BBC the presenter [[Terry Wogan]]. Of course I didn't bother to vote for the [[Eurotrash]] contest [[User:Apostolos Margaritis|Apostolos Margaritis]] 10:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537036 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537035 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.148591880E09 +++$+++ 'Greeks awarding medals and never arguing with each other'... I thought u believed that the Aromanians are not Greeks...:\/. how strange, i am Greek and i am Aromanian! as for the comments on Eurovision, Vissi and the 'quarantees' u gave, one phrase can be said: mare lucru... -- +++$+++ ::::::'Greeks awarding medals and never arguing with each other'... I thought u believed that the Aromanians are not Greeks...:/. how strange, i am Greek and i am Aromanian! as for the comments on Eurovision, Vissi and the 'quarantees' u gave, one phrase can be said: mare lucru... --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 14:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537037 +++$+++ Apostolos Margaritis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537035 +++$+++ 2006-05-26 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.148668380E09 +++$+++ Hectorian, that's a nice \"Latin\" nick-name you've got yourself. It's crystal clear to me that, should you really be a Vlach, you belong to the sad faction of the [[Grecoman]]i Vlachs. A sort of reversed [[Janissary]], exposed from early childhood to Greek only culture, language, school, propaganda, so much in fact that he came to believe he's a Greek, am I correct? But it's your choice, your life. In fact it's too late you became something else by now, so well done, here's another assimilated Vlach, what's the big deal? We are in [[2006]], I hope time will come when the Greeks will allow you to have your first Vlach language newspaper or your first Vlach language FM radio station. Even the [[Baluba]] tribes in [[Congo]] have probably got their own media by now. You're not asking too much inn'it? What? You don't want this? You don't want to offend the Greeks by asking for rights for Vlach language? Listen, the Greeks are well-known for their generosity and tolerance. So here is yet another reason for wanting to remain a Greek wanabee. Better on the side of the bosses than being the underdog, inn'it? I think it's worth the sacrifice  +++$+++ ::::::Hectorian, that's a nice "Latin" nick-name you've got yourself. It's crystal clear to me that, should you really be a Vlach, you belong to the sad faction of the [[Grecoman]]i Vlachs. A sort of reversed [[Janissary]], exposed from early childhood to Greek only culture, language, school, propaganda, so much in fact that he came to believe he's a Greek, am I correct? But it's your choice, your life. In fact it's too late you became something else by now, so well done, here's another assimilated Vlach, what's the big deal? We are in [[2006]], I hope time will come when the Greeks will allow you to have your first Vlach language newspaper or your first Vlach language FM radio station. Even the [[Baluba]] tribes in [[Congo]] have probably got their own media by now. You're not asking too much inn'it? What? You don't want this? You don't want to offend the Greeks by asking for rights for Vlach language? Listen, the Greeks are well-known for their generosity and tolerance. So here is yet another reason for wanting to remain a Greek wanabee. Better on the side of the bosses than being the underdog, inn'it? I think it's worth the sacrifice [[User:Apostolos Margaritis|Apostolos Margaritis]] 11:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
537038 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537035 +++$+++ 2006-05-27 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.148716440E09 +++$+++ Tired, but i will respond to these 'comments': my nick name is not Latin (apart from the -ian, of course). my real name is more greek than u can imagine... apropos, your nick is vlach, isn't it?:p. i am an aromanian (in fact half-aromanian), proud to say it, and i belong to the vast majority of aromanians who have always considered themselves Greeks (cause this is simply what we are). a Janissary? Huh? no need to comment on that (it was deliberately said to bring tension in the discussion). i was indeed exposed to greek culture since i was born...u know, greeks are usually exposed to greek culture, italians to italian and so on... and my ancestors, as further back to the history of my family i can go, they were also exposed to greek culture. vlach language newspaper? hmmm in which alphabet, with which grammar and syntax? u seem to forget that aromanian evolved as an idiom from vulgar latin and never had a written form. not to mentioned that it has always been used along with greek from its speakers. perhaps u are dreaming of someone who will invent all things necessary to create a new ethnic identity? u know, more things are needed for a nation to be born... not to forget that their is no historian from those early times talking about a migration of the romanians to the south (speaking about greek propaganda? why don't u look at the romanian one?)of course, there will always be [[Alkiviadis Diamanti di Samarina|Alkiviades s]], trying to create something that never existed for their own purposes (i know that u have been editting articles related to him... always remember that he was a facist [[Pawn (chess)|pawn]], with no supporters (perhaps the name he should have would be [[Ephialtes]]). and for me, all those (a couple of people, i mean) who desperately try to split the aromanians from the rest of the Greeks, are just wannabe princes or dictators. -- +++$+++ ::::::Tired, but i will respond to these 'comments': my nick name is not Latin (apart from the -ian, of course). my real name is more greek than u can imagine... apropos, your nick is vlach, isn't it?:p. i am an aromanian (in fact half-aromanian), proud to say it, and i belong to the vast majority of aromanians who have always considered themselves Greeks (cause this is simply what we are). a Janissary? Huh? no need to comment on that (it was deliberately said to bring tension in the discussion). i was indeed exposed to greek culture since i was born...u know, greeks are usually exposed to greek culture, italians to italian and so on... and my ancestors, as further back to the history of my family i can go, they were also exposed to greek culture. vlach language newspaper? hmmm in which alphabet, with which grammar and syntax? u seem to forget that aromanian evolved as an idiom from vulgar latin and never had a written form. not to mentioned that it has always been used along with greek from its speakers. perhaps u are dreaming of someone who will invent all things necessary to create a new ethnic identity? u know, more things are needed for a nation to be born... not to forget that their is no historian from those early times talking about a migration of the romanians to the south (speaking about greek propaganda? why don't u look at the romanian one?)of course, there will always be [[Alkiviadis Diamanti di Samarina|Alkiviades s]], trying to create something that never existed for their own purposes (i know that u have been editting articles related to him... always remember that he was a facist [[Pawn (chess)|pawn]], with no supporters (perhaps the name he should have would be [[Ephialtes]]). and for me, all those (a couple of people, i mean) who desperately try to split the aromanians from the rest of the Greeks, are just wannabe princes or dictators. --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 00:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
537039 +++$+++ Apostolos Margaritis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 2006-05-27 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.148759820E09 +++$+++ Hey Greier: Vezi ce \"malachii\" zice mai sus Hectorian? Omul asta are mari probleme de identitate. tsi fatsi gione? tora ti adrashi grec? Arshine mari!  +++$+++ :Hey Greier: Vezi ce "malachii" zice mai sus Hectorian? Omul asta are mari probleme de identitate. tsi fatsi gione? tora ti adrashi grec? Arshine mari! [[User:Apostolos Margaritis|Apostolos Margaritis]] 12:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
537040 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537038 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.148594580E09 +++$+++ Wow! A [[Greek]], a [[Vlach]] and an [[Arvanite]] are conspiring with a grecophile [[Italian]] against an impartial [[Aromanian]], who is not supported even by his fellow editors! My, my, those guys over at the [[Epsilon Team]] have managed to compile all contradicting ideologies, nationalities and self-identifications into one immaculately [[homogenic]] revengeful wolf-pack! We should redirect [[Absolute brain washing machine]] directly to [[Greek propaganda]]... (that, or you just can't see you're simply wrong)  +++$+++ :::::::Wow! A [[Greek]], a [[Vlach]] and an [[Arvanite]] are conspiring with a grecophile [[Italian]] against an impartial [[Aromanian]], who is not supported even by his fellow editors! My, my, those guys over at the [[Epsilon Team]] have managed to compile all contradicting ideologies, nationalities and self-identifications into one immaculately [[homogenic]] revengeful wolf-pack! We should redirect [[Absolute brain washing machine]] directly to [[Greek propaganda]]... (that, or you just can't see you're simply wrong) [[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#778">&nbsp;<span style="background:#889">N<span style="background:#99a">i<span style="background:#aab">k<span style="background:#bbc">o<span style="background:#ccd"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 15:03, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537041 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537038 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.148598600E09 +++$+++ Haha, this one's really great Niko. I must admit that when I read Apostolos message I felt myself invaded by a wave of good humour; immagining myself member of a cosmopolitan cospiration designed to promote Greek nationalism was simply a too magistral idea. I think time has come we disband the Epsilon Team, guys; Apostolos has at the end discovered '''The Truth'''....  +++$+++ :::::::Haha, this one's really great Niko. I must admit that when I read Apostolos message I felt myself invaded by a wave of good humour; immagining myself member of a cosmopolitan cospiration designed to promote Greek nationalism was simply a too magistral idea. I think time has come we disband the Epsilon Team, guys; Apostolos has at the end discovered '''The Truth'''.... [[User:Aldux|Tendentious Graecophiliac]] 16:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537042 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537041 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.148598840E09 +++$+++ I thought the term was [[Philhellenism|\"philhellene\"]]. -- +++$+++ ::::::::I thought the term was [[Philhellenism|"philhellene"]]. --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 16:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537043 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537042 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.148599020E09 +++$+++ I too, but certainly Apostolos knows better ;-)  +++$+++ :::::::::I too, but certainly Apostolos knows better ;-) [[User:Aldux|Tendentious Graecophiliac]] 16:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537044 +++$+++ Greier +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537028 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.148595120E09 +++$+++ Apostole, eu sunt cu tine! esti fratele meu, di s\xe2nge shi di limba.  +++$+++ ::::Apostole, eu sunt cu tine! esti fratele meu, di sânge shi di limba. [[User:Greier|greier]] 15:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537045 +++$+++ Apostolos Margaritis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537044 +++$+++ 2006-05-26 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.148667000E09 +++$+++ Everything has started with Greeks like Miskin etc. and Italians (if he really is one) who became Greek bootliskers the likes of Aldux deleting and vandalizing my editing. Don't get me wrong. I was just insinuating in a very elegant and gentle manner that according to some scholars [[Saint Cyril]] might have had Slavic roots but that was enough to cause an immense outrage among the Greeks folowed by a violent and co-ordinated strike. They in effect are undermining from inside the wiki project trying to divert it off its neutral non-partizane path and convert it or re-direct it if you wish into a Greek [[ethnocentric]] national project. Ceea ce-mi displace e faptul ca se ascund, se deghizeaza. Ia-l de exemplu pe acest Aldux. El pretinde ca e italian pe cand, in realitate e grec. Ei vor sa creeze confuzie sa dea impresia ca punctul lor de vedere e sustinut si de non-greci. In acest context, oare nu e logic ca si noi sa ne organizam efectiv si sa ne ajutam reciproc?  +++$+++ :::::Everything has started with Greeks like Miskin etc. and Italians (if he really is one) who became Greek bootliskers the likes of Aldux deleting and vandalizing my editing. Don't get me wrong. I was just insinuating in a very elegant and gentle manner that according to some scholars [[Saint Cyril]] might have had Slavic roots but that was enough to cause an immense outrage among the Greeks folowed by a violent and co-ordinated strike. They in effect are undermining from inside the wiki project trying to divert it off its neutral non-partizane path and convert it or re-direct it if you wish into a Greek [[ethnocentric]] national project. Ceea ce-mi displace e faptul ca se ascund, se deghizeaza. Ia-l de exemplu pe acest Aldux. El pretinde ca e italian pe cand, in realitate e grec. Ei vor sa creeze confuzie sa dea impresia ca punctul lor de vedere e sustinut si de non-greci. In acest context, oare nu e logic ca si noi sa ne organizam efectiv si sa ne ajutam reciproc? [[User:Apostolos Margaritis|Apostolos Margaritis]] 11:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
537046 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537045 +++$+++ 2006-05-26 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.148669580E09 +++$+++ \"El pretinde ca e italian pe cand, in realitate e grec.\" ?!?!?!?!?! Sarei Greco adesso?! Ma possibile che tu non ti renda conto fino a che punto stai diventando paranoico? Anche se devo ammettere che i tuoi insulti sono particolarmente divertenti; mi ricordano quelli di Asteraki, che mi chiama odiatore dei Greci. Quanto al tuo disegno di creare una combriccola stile mafioso, non contare di ottenere grande successo; l'unico che si unirebbe ad uno piano tanto sciaugurato \xe9 Greier. Comunque, che tu mi creda o meno non me ne pu\xf2 fregar di meno.-- +++$+++ ::::::"El pretinde ca e italian pe cand, in realitate e grec." ?!?!?!?!?! Sarei Greco adesso?! Ma possibile che tu non ti renda conto fino a che punto stai diventando paranoico? Anche se devo ammettere che i tuoi insulti sono particolarmente divertenti; mi ricordano quelli di Asteraki, che mi chiama odiatore dei Greci. Quanto al tuo disegno di creare una combriccola stile mafioso, non contare di ottenere grande successo; l'unico che si unirebbe ad uno piano tanto sciaugurato é Greier. Comunque, che tu mi creda o meno non me ne può fregar di meno.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 11:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
537047 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537046 +++$+++ 2006-05-27 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.148716680E09 +++$+++ God, i really want to learn Italian!(cause it sounds good!):) -- +++$+++ :::::::God, i really want to learn Italian!(cause it sounds good!):) --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 00:58, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
537048 +++$+++ Greier +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537042 +++$+++ 2006-05-26 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.148670840E09 +++$+++ Auzi! Acum am creat o adevarata ''la piovra vlacha''... :)  +++$+++ :::::::::Auzi! Acum am creat o adevarata ''la piovra vlacha''... :) [[User:Greier|greier]] 12:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
537049 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537047 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Eu ti-am zis, cand vrei ajutor, trebuie doar sa-mi zici. 11:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ ::::::::Eu ti-am zis, cand vrei ajutor, trebuie doar sa-mi zici. 11:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
537050 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537044 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.148595300E09 +++$+++ Greier, you can say it in English. Eastern Romance languages aren't that hard to decipher: ''Apostole, I am with you! you are my brother, of blood and language.'' -- +++$+++ :::::Greier, you can say it in English. Eastern Romance languages aren't that hard to decipher: ''Apostole, I am with you! you are my brother, of blood and language.'' --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 15:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537051 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537050 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.148595540E09 +++$+++ Or in Italian: ''Apostole, io sono con te! sei mio fratello, di sangue e di lingua.'' (talking about wolf-packs!)  +++$+++ ::::::Or in Italian: ''Apostole, io sono con te! sei mio fratello, di sangue e di lingua.'' (talking about wolf-packs!) [[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#778">&nbsp;<span style="background:#889">N<span style="background:#99a">i<span style="background:#aab">k<span style="background:#bbc">o<span style="background:#ccd"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 15:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537052 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537051 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.148595900E09 +++$+++ Or in [[Arvanitika]]: ''Apostol, u jam me ti. Je v\xebllai im, i gjakut edhe i gljuh\xebs.'' -- +++$+++ :::::::Or in [[Arvanitika]]: ''Apostol, u jam me ti. Je vëllai im, i gjakut edhe i gljuhës.'' --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 15:25, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537053 +++$+++ Greier +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537050 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.148596080E09 +++$+++ So, wouldn`t be a shame for this beautiful language to be lost forever, replaced by ''tzeflekiki, pouliki, moukiki, poulos, karagolous, mousos'' and all that ''ousos''  +++$+++ ::::::So, wouldn`t be a shame for this beautiful language to be lost forever, replaced by ''tzeflekiki, pouliki, moukiki, poulos, karagolous, mousos'' and all that ''ousos'' [[User:Greier|greier]] 15:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537054 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537053 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.148596380E09 +++$+++ There's nothing wrong with the [[Greek language]]. All languages have good and bad points - I admit though, it is a shame for any language to die out. -- +++$+++ :::::::There's nothing wrong with the [[Greek language]]. All languages have good and bad points - I admit though, it is a shame for any language to die out. --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 15:33, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537055 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.148598660E09 +++$+++ Ummm, Greier, these are not Greek words (except maybe [[WP:DICK|\"poulos\"]]). Actually the transliteration would be quite pleasant for the ears: ''Apost\xf3li, egh\xf3 \xedme maz\xed su, \xedse adhelf\xf3s mu, sto \xe9ma ke sti ghl\xf3ssa...''  +++$+++ :Ummm, Greier, these are not Greek words (except maybe [[WP:DICK|"poulos"]]). Actually the transliteration would be quite pleasant for the ears: ''Apostóli, eghó íme mazí su, íse adhelfós mu, sto éma ke sti ghlóssa...'' [[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#778">&nbsp;<span style="background:#889">N<span style="background:#99a">i<span style="background:#aab">k<span style="background:#bbc">o<span style="background:#ccd"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 16:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
537056 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537021 +++$+++ 537055 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.148598780E09 +++$+++ LOL... ;-) -- +++$+++ ::LOL... ;-) --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 16:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

274880 +++$+++ Blakegripling ph +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274880 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-22 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.227369120E09 +++$+++ OK, so while browsing my watchlist, I saw something peculiar in one of the pages that I'm watching; the user seems to be quite suspicious, based on his user page (similar to Wynchard Bloom's) which leads to the conclusion that he's Gerald. Can you like give him the stick?  +++$+++ OK, so while browsing my watchlist, I saw something peculiar in one of the pages that I'm watching; the user seems to be quite suspicious, based on his user page (similar to Wynchard Bloom's) which leads to the conclusion that he's Gerald. Can you like give him the stick? [[User:Blakegripling ph|Blake Gripling]] ([[User talk:Blakegripling ph|talk]]) 07:52, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
274881 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274880 +++$+++ 274880 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.227371100E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks for that. I'll have a look into it now and maybe add it to the checkuser request. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Okay, thanks for that. I'll have a look into it now and maybe add it to the checkuser request. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
274882 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274880 +++$+++ 274880 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.227371280E09 +++$+++ I agree, that's either Gerald or a very good impersonator but another admin has already blocked it. If he does what he has done in the past, he will just keep creating socks so if you notice more Gerald-looking accounts on your travels, it might be worth adding them to the checkuser request.  +++$+++ :I agree, that's either Gerald or a very good impersonator but another admin has already blocked it. If he does what he has done in the past, he will just keep creating socks so if you notice more Gerald-looking accounts on your travels, it might be worth adding them to the checkuser request. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
274883 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274880 +++$+++ 274880 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.227371760E09 +++$+++ See also the list of further socks on the talk page of that account - [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:I_Love_Philippines&diff=prev&oldid=253356630].  +++$+++ :See also the list of further socks on the talk page of that account - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:I_Love_Philippines&diff=prev&oldid=253356630]. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
274884 +++$+++ Blakegripling ph +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274880 +++$+++ 274883 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.227371880E09 +++$+++ Yep, seen 'em.  +++$+++ ::Yep, seen 'em. [[User:Blakegripling ph|Blake Gripling]] ([[User talk:Blakegripling ph|talk]]) 08:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

12738 +++$+++ Wtmitchell +++$+++ Christopher Parham +++$+++ 12738 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-19 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.268990640E09 +++$+++ I just want to draw your attention to a couple of discussions going on at [[MediaWiki talk:Common.css#Coloring of the cited source missing]] and at [[Wikipedia talk:Citing sources\/Example edits for different methods#Use of the HTML &lt;cite>&lt;\/cite> element]]. You and\/or other [[WP:CITE]] contributors may or may not be interested. Cheers,  +++$+++ I just want to draw your attention to a couple of discussions going on at [[MediaWiki talk:Common.css#Coloring of the cited source missing]] and at [[Wikipedia talk:Citing sources/Example edits for different methods#Use of the HTML &lt;cite>&lt;/cite> element]]. You and/or other [[WP:CITE]] contributors may or may not be interested. Cheers, [[User:Wtmitchell|Wtmitchell]]  [[User talk:Wtmitchell|(talk)]] <small>(earlier ''Boracay Bill'')</small> 02:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
12739 +++$+++ Wtmitchell +++$+++ Christopher Parham +++$+++ 12738 +++$+++ 12738 +++$+++ 2010-03-20 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.269078420E09 +++$+++ (added) also see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ACiting_sources%2FFurther_considerations&action=historysubmit&diff=350908192&oldid=293733454 this] related edit.  +++$+++ :(added) also see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ACiting_sources%2FFurther_considerations&action=historysubmit&diff=350908192&oldid=293733454 this] related edit. [[User:Wtmitchell|Wtmitchell]]  [[User talk:Wtmitchell|(talk)]] <small>(earlier ''Boracay Bill'')</small> 02:47, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

274885 +++$+++ Blakegripling ph +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-22 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.227374340E09 +++$+++ OK, so you deleted it, since it was made by a banned user. The movie is in fact confirmed (although I'm not really a fan of Angel Locsin) and to be shown maybe in 2009. Protecting it from recreation might work, but it would mean collateral damage as good-faith users might not be able to edit it again. Any thoughts on this?  +++$+++ OK, so you deleted it, since it was made by a banned user. The movie is in fact confirmed (although I'm not really a fan of Angel Locsin) and to be shown maybe in 2009. Protecting it from recreation might work, but it would mean collateral damage as good-faith users might not be able to edit it again. Any thoughts on this? [[User:Blakegripling ph|Blake Gripling]] ([[User talk:Blakegripling ph|talk]]) 09:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
274886 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274885 +++$+++ 274885 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 09:27:00 +++$+++ 1.227374820E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm trying to be very careful about what I revert or delete but I feel we need to remove at least some to try to get the message across that what he's doing isn't acceptable and that he's wasting his time. So I have left a few articles that otherwise looked okay. This film seemed kind of borderline to me but I would provide a copy of it via email if a non-sock wanted to use it to write a new article. Does the film meet the notability guidelines for films? [[Wikipedia:Notability (films)]]. If not, then it might be best to protect from recreation for the time being otherwise it's probably best to leave it unprotected so a non-sock can write a new page.  +++$+++ :Yeah, I'm trying to be very careful about what I revert or delete but I feel we need to remove at least some to try to get the message across that what he's doing isn't acceptable and that he's wasting his time. So I have left a few articles that otherwise looked okay. This film seemed kind of borderline to me but I would provide a copy of it via email if a non-sock wanted to use it to write a new article. Does the film meet the notability guidelines for films? [[Wikipedia:Notability (films)]]. If not, then it might be best to protect from recreation for the time being otherwise it's probably best to leave it unprotected so a non-sock can write a new page. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
274887 +++$+++ Blakegripling ph +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274885 +++$+++ 274886 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.227375720E09 +++$+++ Oh, just to tell you: You're right about deleting it; there's a [[Land Down Under (film)|similar page]]. But you can still keep the old version.  +++$+++ ::Oh, just to tell you: You're right about deleting it; there's a [[Land Down Under (film)|similar page]]. But you can still keep the old version. [[User:Blakegripling ph|Blake Gripling]] ([[User talk:Blakegripling ph|talk]]) 09:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

274889 +++$+++ Berean Hunter +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-25 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.227614040E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, there is an [[WP:ANI#Strange edit war|ANI thread]] currently on Simulation12 in case you are interested. Cheers,<br> +++$+++ Hi Sarah, there is an [[WP:ANI#Strange edit war|ANI thread]] currently on Simulation12 in case you are interested. Cheers,<br>[[User:Berean Hunter|<font face="High Tower Text" size="3px"><b style="color:#00C">⋙–Ber</b><b style="color:#66f">ean–Hun</b><b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b></font>]] ([[User talk:Berean Hunter|<b style="color:#00C">(⊕)</b>]]) 03:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
274890 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274889 +++$+++ 274889 +++$+++ 2008-11-25 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.227615000E09 +++$+++ Okay thanks, I'll have a look in a minute. I've already blocked her. Initially I was just going to give her a final warning but then I thought there's no point in dragging this out further. And she's had plenty of warnings and opportunities to change her behaviour but continues being a pest. So I went ahead and blocked her.  +++$+++ :Okay thanks, I'll have a look in a minute. I've already blocked her. Initially I was just going to give her a final warning but then I thought there's no point in dragging this out further. And she's had plenty of warnings and opportunities to change her behaviour but continues being a pest. So I went ahead and blocked her. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:10, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
274891 +++$+++ Gladys j cortez +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274889 +++$+++ 274890 +++$+++ 2008-11-25 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.227624300E09 +++$+++ Your name has been inscribed for all eternity on my List of Friends and Benefactors. (Well, if I had one, it would be.) Seriously, I canNOT thank you enough for making that move. Had I not been so \"involved\", I would have done it myself a few hours ago, so I am THRILLED that you took care of the block. I hereby award you all the pictures of cookies, cute kitty-cats, bunnies, barnstars, and smiles that Wikipedia has to offer.  +++$+++ ::Your name has been inscribed for all eternity on my List of Friends and Benefactors. (Well, if I had one, it would be.) Seriously, I canNOT thank you enough for making that move. Had I not been so "involved", I would have done it myself a few hours ago, so I am THRILLED that you took care of the block. I hereby award you all the pictures of cookies, cute kitty-cats, bunnies, barnstars, and smiles that Wikipedia has to offer. [[User talk:Gladys j cortez|GJC]] 06:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
274892 +++$+++ Elbutler +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274889 +++$+++ 274890 +++$+++ 2008-11-25 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.227646140E09 +++$+++ Twice as much thank-you then Gladys! For 3 months she pested me and when i told her the truth about her editing she insulted me and Gladys on her page, it was like she was some cyber-stalker.  +++$+++ ::Twice as much thank-you then Gladys! For 3 months she pested me and when i told her the truth about her editing she insulted me and Gladys on her page, it was like she was some cyber-stalker. [[User:Elbutler|Elbutler]] ([[User talk:Elbutler|talk]]) 12:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
274893 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274889 +++$+++ 274892 +++$+++ 2008-11-25 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.227681720E09 +++$+++ My pleasure, people. I must say I feel a bit bad that I didn't do this earlier. A few weeks back I put her pages on my watchlist with the intention of stepping and blocking if she continued being a pest but I haven't been on Wikipedia a lot recently and so wasn't able to keep a close eye on the situation. My apologies for letting it drag on as long as it has.  +++$+++ :::My pleasure, people. I must say I feel a bit bad that I didn't do this earlier. A few weeks back I put her pages on my watchlist with the intention of stepping and blocking if she continued being a pest but I haven't been on Wikipedia a lot recently and so wasn't able to keep a close eye on the situation. My apologies for letting it drag on as long as it has. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 22:42, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
274894 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274889 +++$+++ 274892 +++$+++ 2008-11-25 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.227682140E09 +++$+++ Also, I've blocked that IP you (Gladys) mentioned on ANI. It's blocked for one month with account creation disabled, so hopefully that'll give y'all a nice, peaceful Christmas at least.:)  +++$+++ :::Also, I've blocked that IP you (Gladys) mentioned on ANI. It's blocked for one month with account creation disabled, so hopefully that'll give y'all a nice, peaceful Christmas at least.:) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 22:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

439031 +++$+++ HouseOfScandal +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-11 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.165830780E09 +++$+++ I thought you had rv'd ''all'' my edits (which would have been malicious) rather than just added your choice bit back in.  I apologize for the tone of my protest.  When I just checked the article, I saw that my comment re: Newfoundland and your quote re: Oregon are side-by-side.  Since I don't want to create a \"too many cooks\" situation I'll leave you to remove my comment and harmonize the text.  Best wishes. '''[[Special:Contributions\/HouseOfScandal|<font color=\"blue\">\u25c4<\/font>]][[User talk:HouseOfScandal|<font color=\"blue\">HouseOfScandal<\/font>]] +++$+++ I thought you had rv'd ''all'' my edits (which would have been malicious) rather than just added your choice bit back in.  I apologize for the tone of my protest.  When I just checked the article, I saw that my comment re: Newfoundland and your quote re: Oregon are side-by-side.  Since I don't want to create a "too many cooks" situation I'll leave you to remove my comment and harmonize the text.  Best wishes. '''[[Special:Contributions/HouseOfScandal|<font color="blue">◄</font>]][[User talk:HouseOfScandal|<font color="blue">HouseOfScandal</font>]][[User_talk:HouseOfScandal|<font color="blue">►</font>]]'''01:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
439032 +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439031 +++$+++ 439031 +++$+++ 2006-12-11 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.165831980E09 +++$+++ I do appreciate the fact that many of your edits were in the direction of tightening up the text and trying to say the same thing in fewer words.  +++$+++ :I do appreciate the fact that many of your edits were in the direction of tightening up the text and trying to say the same thing in fewer words. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] [[User_talk:dpbsmith|(talk)]] 02:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

274895 +++$+++ Slemcal1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-23 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.227431400E09 +++$+++ I am writing to you about Wynchard Bloom and how he has been a big nuisance in my Wikipedia history which all have basically started last week. I was banned for 4-5 days because of his false assumptions and silly complaints that he had filed against me. You could also view my talk page (if you haven't already) to further enhance your idea of the situation and how he has been depriving all of us including the Administrators from the truth. My main concern now, which has been the reason why i got into wikipedia, is several Filipino celebrity articles in which (in my opinion) he has been vandalizing although according to him, he has been contributing. One of the main celebrities that i have been justifying is [[Sam Concepcion]] and the article on this person has been severely affected by Wynchard's edits. I don't see any positives as to how he has improved his article and indeed has depleted the article from useful information. I am currently consulting Master Of puppets (administrator) on why should his revision be reverted back to the original however have been put on hold and therefore i am consulting you for your opinion. My edits (the one im trying to justify which was the original one) is said to be \"questionably [[WP:POV|NPOV]]\" I have reviewed your history and have seen that you are aware of Wynchard's edits and you are reverting his edit just like on [[Jay-R Siaboc]]. I have raised a suggestion to bring back the original edit however, i have been denied of this and have been told that i should just  work from Wynchard's edits. I just don't see how any of his contributions could still be valid and i don't also think he'll have a strong valid reason regarding his concern on that article. Please read my talk page as i have raised lots of issues there in regards to Wynchard as i couldn't make other comments elsewhere except my page due to all the false accusations he has filed against me. I also want to thank you for your investigation against Wynchard and how you have proved who really is guilty. Anyway please investigate on this matter about reverting Wynchard's edits on [[Sam Concepcion]]'s Page. Thank you. You are my hero on wikipedia for catching Wynchard's wrong-doings and blocking him.  :)  +++$+++ I am writing to you about Wynchard Bloom and how he has been a big nuisance in my Wikipedia history which all have basically started last week. I was banned for 4-5 days because of his false assumptions and silly complaints that he had filed against me. You could also view my talk page (if you haven't already) to further enhance your idea of the situation and how he has been depriving all of us including the Administrators from the truth. My main concern now, which has been the reason why i got into wikipedia, is several Filipino celebrity articles in which (in my opinion) he has been vandalizing although according to him, he has been contributing. One of the main celebrities that i have been justifying is [[Sam Concepcion]] and the article on this person has been severely affected by Wynchard's edits. I don't see any positives as to how he has improved his article and indeed has depleted the article from useful information. I am currently consulting Master Of puppets (administrator) on why should his revision be reverted back to the original however have been put on hold and therefore i am consulting you for your opinion. My edits (the one im trying to justify which was the original one) is said to be "questionably [[WP:POV|NPOV]]" I have reviewed your history and have seen that you are aware of Wynchard's edits and you are reverting his edit just like on [[Jay-R Siaboc]]. I have raised a suggestion to bring back the original edit however, i have been denied of this and have been told that i should just  work from Wynchard's edits. I just don't see how any of his contributions could still be valid and i don't also think he'll have a strong valid reason regarding his concern on that article. Please read my talk page as i have raised lots of issues there in regards to Wynchard as i couldn't make other comments elsewhere except my page due to all the false accusations he has filed against me. I also want to thank you for your investigation against Wynchard and how you have proved who really is guilty. Anyway please investigate on this matter about reverting Wynchard's edits on [[Sam Concepcion]]'s Page. Thank you. You are my hero on wikipedia for catching Wynchard's wrong-doings and blocking him.  :) [[User:Slemcal1|Slemcal]] ([[User talk:Slemcal1|talk]]) 01:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
274896 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274895 +++$+++ 274895 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.227452160E09 +++$+++ Hi Slemcal. I removed some of Gerald's edits per the banning policy - [[Wikipedia:BAN#Enforcement by reverting edits]]. I looked at the [[Sam Concepcion]] article that you mention but I'm not comfortable restoring your version because I don't think language like \"Multimedia Heartthrob\", \"has steadily risen towards stardom\" and \"young and famous\" is NPOV or encyclopedic language. Also, it lists out unsourced information about not notable minors and other relatives which I don't think is appropriate and [[WP:BLP]] has a specific presumption in favour of privacy especially for not notable people. I feel that a lot of that material about award nominations and percentage of votes is unnecessary (and all unsourced). So I'm not going to restore that material and I don't think you should either. When you add material to biographies, it's really, really important that you cite sources to comply with [[WP:BLP|BLP]] and [[WP:V|verifiability]] policies.   +++$+++ :Hi Slemcal. I removed some of Gerald's edits per the banning policy - [[Wikipedia:BAN#Enforcement by reverting edits]]. I looked at the [[Sam Concepcion]] article that you mention but I'm not comfortable restoring your version because I don't think language like "Multimedia Heartthrob", "has steadily risen towards stardom" and "young and famous" is NPOV or encyclopedic language. Also, it lists out unsourced information about not notable minors and other relatives which I don't think is appropriate and [[WP:BLP]] has a specific presumption in favour of privacy especially for not notable people. I feel that a lot of that material about award nominations and percentage of votes is unnecessary (and all unsourced). So I'm not going to restore that material and I don't think you should either. When you add material to biographies, it's really, really important that you cite sources to comply with [[WP:BLP|BLP]] and [[WP:V|verifiability]] policies.  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
274897 +++$+++ Slemcal1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274895 +++$+++ 274896 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.227452940E09 +++$+++ Perhaps, if you restore it back to before wynchard blooms edit, and add an {{[[POV-check]]}} tag, hopefully that it will induce its major contributors to re-edit the page and reconsider. It wasn't really me who gathered and added those information on the page. Furthermore, those people are not really regular users and only want to contribute to that page so more likely they won't be aware of those rules. Would it be possible though, if you restore that revision and perhaps give us time to edit the page so that it will satisfy, Wikipedia's criteria. I'll try and get it across to that page's major contributor to follow the rules. if we compare his revision to the old one, its just degrading to see that kind of set back, even though i wasn't even the one who put all those information up. however, i will contribute and try meet wikipedia's standard, although i was hoping to work back from the original. would you be able to consider that? thanks  +++$+++ :: Perhaps, if you restore it back to before wynchard blooms edit, and add an {{[[POV-check]]}} tag, hopefully that it will induce its major contributors to re-edit the page and reconsider. It wasn't really me who gathered and added those information on the page. Furthermore, those people are not really regular users and only want to contribute to that page so more likely they won't be aware of those rules. Would it be possible though, if you restore that revision and perhaps give us time to edit the page so that it will satisfy, Wikipedia's criteria. I'll try and get it across to that page's major contributor to follow the rules. if we compare his revision to the old one, its just degrading to see that kind of set back, even though i wasn't even the one who put all those information up. however, i will contribute and try meet wikipedia's standard, although i was hoping to work back from the original. would you be able to consider that? thanks [[User:Slemcal1|Slemcal]] ([[User talk:Slemcal1|talk]]) 07:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
274898 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274895 +++$+++ 274897 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.227453600E09 +++$+++ I can't revert it back because I believe some of the material in \"your\" version, especially the personal information about not notable relatives is a violation of the policy on [[WP:BLP|Biographies of living people]]. I'm in favour of removing banned editor's edit but not when I think doing so would violate BLP or degrade the quality of articles. I think it would be better if you just started working on the article as it is now, leaving out information about not notable relatives and being careful to use neutral language and citing [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] for any information you add to it.  +++$+++ :::I can't revert it back because I believe some of the material in "your" version, especially the personal information about not notable relatives is a violation of the policy on [[WP:BLP|Biographies of living people]]. I'm in favour of removing banned editor's edit but not when I think doing so would violate BLP or degrade the quality of articles. I think it would be better if you just started working on the article as it is now, leaving out information about not notable relatives and being careful to use neutral language and citing [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] for any information you add to it. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
274899 +++$+++ Slemcal1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274895 +++$+++ 274898 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.227454020E09 +++$+++ ok then, so would it be possible for me to edit the page even with semi-protection? i just don't want to be blocked again. thanks  +++$+++ :::: ok then, so would it be possible for me to edit the page even with semi-protection? i just don't want to be blocked again. thanks [[User:Slemcal1|Slemcal]] ([[User talk:Slemcal1|talk]]) 07:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
274900 +++$+++ Slemcal1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274895 +++$+++ 274898 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.227454020E09 +++$+++ in regards to deleting, and editing, Would i still be able to do that? i just want your confirmation as i don't to be banned later on. thanks +++$+++ :::: in regards to deleting, and editing, Would i still be able to do that? i just want your confirmation as i don't to be banned later on. thanks[[User:Slemcal1|Slemcal]] ([[User talk:Slemcal1|talk]]) 07:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
274901 +++$+++ Slemcal1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274895 +++$+++ 274900 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.227454980E09 +++$+++ with the picture that has been uploaded, i thought you asked for the picture to be deleted so i asked if i can delete however i have checked it and that uploader stated that it is self made. \"I don't believe the editor who added it really owns the copyright. It looks like a professional image.\" it could be perhaps the photographer is the uploader and from the pic and there is no water marks to prove it is copyrighted. So yeah, what do you think?  +++$+++ ::::: with the picture that has been uploaded, i thought you asked for the picture to be deleted so i asked if i can delete however i have checked it and that uploader stated that it is self made. "I don't believe the editor who added it really owns the copyright. It looks like a professional image." it could be perhaps the photographer is the uploader and from the pic and there is no water marks to prove it is copyrighted. So yeah, what do you think? [[User:Slemcal1|Slemcal]] ([[User talk:Slemcal1|talk]]) 07:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
274902 +++$+++ Slemcal1 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274895 +++$+++ 274901 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.227458280E09 +++$+++ In regards to this, http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Samster101#Image:SamConcepcion-2.jpg, perhaps this user is the photographer and at the same time being quite careless because they are probably not familiar with the rules and is only there for the sole reason of contributing to Sam Concepcion's Page. Plus, the person probably doesn't go on that much and does not know of the rules in Wikipedia. In fact, their picture could still be legible, as if it was a professional picture, and i was the photographer, i wouldn't really let any one have the original without Watermarks to identify its copyrighted. Nor would i let people have copies, and so perhaps the person who has probably have been accused of so many things is just someone clueless like me. If i was a photographer and had a job, i wouldn't be spending my time on wikipedia reviewing all the rules. And now a days, with the technology we have, we could actually get a picture with that kind of finish. It does really add to wikipedia's reputation having that kind of picture as if we put normal fan pics, taken by fans, it'll end up in a \"Fannish\" finnish and look more like a blog regardless of whether the information are NPOV. :) just in case this will make you change your mind.  +++$+++ :::::: In regards to this, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Samster101#Image:SamConcepcion-2.jpg, perhaps this user is the photographer and at the same time being quite careless because they are probably not familiar with the rules and is only there for the sole reason of contributing to Sam Concepcion's Page. Plus, the person probably doesn't go on that much and does not know of the rules in Wikipedia. In fact, their picture could still be legible, as if it was a professional picture, and i was the photographer, i wouldn't really let any one have the original without Watermarks to identify its copyrighted. Nor would i let people have copies, and so perhaps the person who has probably have been accused of so many things is just someone clueless like me. If i was a photographer and had a job, i wouldn't be spending my time on wikipedia reviewing all the rules. And now a days, with the technology we have, we could actually get a picture with that kind of finish. It does really add to wikipedia's reputation having that kind of picture as if we put normal fan pics, taken by fans, it'll end up in a "Fannish" finnish and look more like a blog regardless of whether the information are NPOV. :) just in case this will make you change your mind. [[User:Slemcal1|Slemcal]] ([[User talk:Slemcal1|talk]]) 08:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

570104 +++$+++ Spebi +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 07:17:00 +++$+++ 1.189693020E09 +++$+++ Yeah, sorry about that, I thought someone had just copied a few threads to the archive and forgot to remove them. Sorry for any confusion caused. If we archive just the inactive threads, will it be a problem if the threads aren't listed in chronological order?  +++$+++ Yeah, sorry about that, I thought someone had just copied a few threads to the archive and forgot to remove them. Sorry for any confusion caused. If we archive just the inactive threads, will it be a problem if the threads aren't listed in chronological order? [[User:Spebi|<b><font color="mediumblue">''Sebi''</font></b>]] <sub color="royalblue">[[User_talk:Spebi|[talk]]]</sub> 07:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
570105 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570104 +++$+++ 570104 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.189693680E09 +++$+++ No problem, you couldn't have known. And was easy for me to fix so no confusion caused. And yes, I think the same. I took a look and most threads have been to recently active to be archived, yet the page is getting way to big. So yeah, I think we have to archive in \"non chronological order\" and just archive those threads who is not needed any more. Although they are not many... Should you or I do it? Or should we make up a list of thread headers on the archive page together to see that we agree and then cut and paste the content to them afterwards? -- +++$+++ :No problem, you couldn't have known. And was easy for me to fix so no confusion caused. And yes, I think the same. I took a look and most threads have been to recently active to be archived, yet the page is getting way to big. So yeah, I think we have to archive in "non chronological order" and just archive those threads who is not needed any more. Although they are not many... Should you or I do it? Or should we make up a list of thread headers on the archive page together to see that we agree and then cut and paste the content to them afterwards? --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 07:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
570106 +++$+++ Spebi +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570104 +++$+++ 570105 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.189696620E09 +++$+++ Just simply go through some of the threads on the page and filter through, spotting threads that are unlikely to receive any replies to them in the near future (i.e. \"Support\" section), or threads that are outdated (i.e. \"Credit\" section).  +++$+++ ::Just simply go through some of the threads on the page and filter through, spotting threads that are unlikely to receive any replies to them in the near future (i.e. "Support" section), or threads that are outdated (i.e. "Credit" section). [[User:Spebi|<b><font color="mediumblue">''Sebi''</font></b>]] <sub color="royalblue">[[User_talk:Spebi|[talk]]]</sub> 08:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

12754 +++$+++ Bluszczokrzew +++$+++ Christopher Parham +++$+++ 12754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.309986840E09 +++$+++ Many sections of this article were copied Will Durant's Story of civilization. I've compared both texts [[User:Bluszczokrzew\/Pascal|here]] +++$+++ Many sections of this article were copied Will Durant's Story of civilization. I've compared both texts [[User:Bluszczokrzew/Pascal|here]][[User:Bluszczokrzew|Bluszczokrzew]] ([[User talk:Bluszczokrzew|talk]]) 14:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
12755 +++$+++ NortyNort +++$+++ Christopher Parham +++$+++ 12754 +++$+++ 12754 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310726520E09 +++$+++ I have nominated this article for [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Blaise Pascal\/archive1|FA review]].-- +++$+++ :I have nominated this article for [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Blaise Pascal/archive1|FA review]].--[[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]]  <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 03:42, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

613795 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-28 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.248812100E09 +++$+++ Hi, Dave, while I'm not keen on DroEsperanto's manner, I'm beginning to feel uneasily sympathetic with his comments that there's too much biographical icing on the scientific cake. At first I accepted it as simply a difference of style, which became apparent at ''[[Origin of Species]]''. But here the bio and quotational icing exceeds the book report and analysis \/ commentary by quite a lot. The \"Content\" section looks very truncated - unless either it's a very short book or it's so technical that non-botanists will be nonplussed. And, as I commented at FAC, I'd like to see more about the origins of the concepts of symbiosis, coevolution and preadaptation \/ exaptation, which seem quite important as presented in the article. -- +++$+++ Hi, Dave, while I'm not keen on DroEsperanto's manner, I'm beginning to feel uneasily sympathetic with his comments that there's too much biographical icing on the scientific cake. At first I accepted it as simply a difference of style, which became apparent at ''[[Origin of Species]]''. But here the bio and quotational icing exceeds the book report and analysis / commentary by quite a lot. The "Content" section looks very truncated - unless either it's a very short book or it's so technical that non-botanists will be nonplussed. And, as I commented at FAC, I'd like to see more about the origins of the concepts of symbiosis, coevolution and preadaptation / exaptation, which seem quite important as presented in the article. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 13:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
613796 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613795 +++$+++ 613795 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.248813420E09 +++$+++ At first I was getting the impression that the book had little impact other than alerting biologists to Sprengel's work \u2013 the background section has since been expanded to show the origins of ideas (against DroEsperanto's preference) and I'll try to find more information in the Thompson source about implications of the book. Have added the point that Darwin was the first to set out [[coevolution]], in the paragraph on the ''Origin'', will find somewhere else to emphasise that point. Guess we could always move the article to \"Darwin's work on insect fertilisation of orchids\", but we need a book article in relation to the various other articles about Darwin and his works. .  +++$+++ :At first I was getting the impression that the book had little impact other than alerting biologists to Sprengel's work – the background section has since been expanded to show the origins of ideas (against DroEsperanto's preference) and I'll try to find more information in the Thompson source about implications of the book. Have added the point that Darwin was the first to set out [[coevolution]], in the paragraph on the ''Origin'', will find somewhere else to emphasise that point. Guess we could always move the article to "Darwin's work on insect fertilisation of orchids", but we need a book article in relation to the various other articles about Darwin and his works. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 13:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
613797 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613795 +++$+++ 613796 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.248818100E09 +++$+++ My impression from the article is already that ''Fertilisation'' had greater impact than one would expect from a short book on a specialised subject - as well as introducing or reinforcing evolutionary concepts, it made several eminent converts to D's ideas on evolution, and launched (? and re-launched?) floral ecology. I notice that [http:\/\/scholar.google.co.uk\/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Fertilisation%20of%20Orchids%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws  Google Scholar for \"Fertilisation of Orchids\"] gets a ton of hits, which suggested the book is still respected to-day. Not bad for a book that started as botanical R&R! The trick is to make the book's significance clear to readers who have not spent much time reading about evolution, let alone editing WP articles about it.-- +++$+++ ::My impression from the article is already that ''Fertilisation'' had greater impact than one would expect from a short book on a specialised subject - as well as introducing or reinforcing evolutionary concepts, it made several eminent converts to D's ideas on evolution, and launched (? and re-launched?) floral ecology. I notice that [http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Fertilisation%20of%20Orchids%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws  Google Scholar for "Fertilisation of Orchids"] gets a ton of hits, which suggested the book is still respected to-day. Not bad for a book that started as botanical R&R! The trick is to make the book's significance clear to readers who have not spent much time reading about evolution, let alone editing WP articles about it.--[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 14:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
613798 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613795 +++$+++ 613797 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.248818520E09 +++$+++ OK, gotta do other things for a bit now, will review that. See what you think about the book section on the mechanism, now that I've added annotation to the image. Small print! .  +++$+++ :::OK, gotta do other things for a bit now, will review that. See what you think about the book section on the mechanism, now that I've added annotation to the image. Small print! . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:02, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
613799 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613795 +++$+++ 613798 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.249080420E09 +++$+++ Struck most of my comments as resolved, found couple of new issues because your restructurings and rephrasings made them more visible. I'm really enjoying this article and look forward to supporting it very shortly and rebutting the \"dull little book\" with which MF sullied his \"support\". -- +++$+++ ::::Struck most of my comments as resolved, found couple of new issues because your restructurings and rephrasings made them more visible. I'm really enjoying this article and look forward to supporting it very shortly and rebutting the "dull little book" with which MF sullied his "support". --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 15:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
613800 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613795 +++$+++ 613799 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.249080720E09 +++$+++ Thanks, will look in a few minutes. Have to get my mind back on topic again! . .  +++$+++ :::::Thanks, will look in a few minutes. Have to get my mind back on topic again! . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

12759 +++$+++ Jackturner3 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12759 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-30 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.183235220E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Jackturner3|jackturner3]] 13:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
12760 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12759 +++$+++ 12759 +++$+++ 2007-06-30 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.183247220E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :) -- +++$+++ :Thanks! :) --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 16:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

12761 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-01 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.183313460E09 +++$+++ As you've requested, I've organized those two sections into multiple sub-sections, made all block quotes normal font, not italic, and converted most of the text that was placed in parentheses into article prose instead.-- +++$+++ As you've requested, I've organized those two sections into multiple sub-sections, made all block quotes normal font, not italic, and converted most of the text that was placed in parentheses into article prose instead.--[[User:PericlesofAthens|PericlesofAthens]] 11:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
12762 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12761 +++$+++ 12761 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.183316340E09 +++$+++ Quick response and great work, passed GA! -- +++$+++ :Quick response and great work, passed GA! --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 11:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
12763 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12761 +++$+++ 12762 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.183326780E09 +++$+++ Awesome, that's very good news. Thank you, and it's good to see some Finns on Wikipedia. Do you think Finnish history on wiki is lacking (I've seen some articles you've edited)? It's good to know that there's a Finnish wiki project.-- +++$+++ ::Awesome, that's very good news. Thank you, and it's good to see some Finns on Wikipedia. Do you think Finnish history on wiki is lacking (I've seen some articles you've edited)? It's good to know that there's a Finnish wiki project.--[[User:PericlesofAthens|PericlesofAthens]] 14:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
12764 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12761 +++$+++ 12763 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.183329360E09 +++$+++ Yes, it is lacking big time. I have started to complement it from the 12-13th century upwards. There is work for years to come :) -- +++$+++ :::Yes, it is lacking big time. I have started to complement it from the 12-13th century upwards. There is work for years to come :) --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 15:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

274906 +++$+++ Zagalejo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-01 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.228130220E09 +++$+++ Hello. I see you speedily deleted the article [[Singer's Midgets]] on October 4. Just out of curiosity, would I be able to get a copy of that article? The Singer Midgets were a pretty important performing troupe in the 1930s (they have their own entry in this [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=XFnfnKg6BcAC&pg=PA1027&dq=%22singer%27s+midgets%22&client=firefox-a Vaudeville encyclopedia]), and I think they should be covered in Wikipedia somewhere.  +++$+++ Hello. I see you speedily deleted the article [[Singer's Midgets]] on October 4. Just out of curiosity, would I be able to get a copy of that article? The Singer Midgets were a pretty important performing troupe in the 1930s (they have their own entry in this [http://books.google.com/books?id=XFnfnKg6BcAC&pg=PA1027&dq=%22singer%27s+midgets%22&client=firefox-a Vaudeville encyclopedia]), and I think they should be covered in Wikipedia somewhere. [[User: Zagalejo|Zagalejo]]'''[[User talk:Zagalejo|^^^]]''' 03:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
274907 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274906 +++$+++ 274906 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.228135320E09 +++$+++ Sure thing. I will email it to you in a few minutes.  +++$+++ :Sure thing. I will email it to you in a few minutes. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
274908 +++$+++ Zagalejo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274906 +++$+++ 274907 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.228191180E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot. Would it be possible for me to start a new article on the topic? I'm confident that, with a little research, I can write something that's fully compliant with all policies and guidelines.  +++$+++ ::Thanks a lot. Would it be possible for me to start a new article on the topic? I'm confident that, with a little research, I can write something that's fully compliant with all policies and guidelines. [[User: Zagalejo|Zagalejo]]'''[[User talk:Zagalejo|^^^]]''' 20:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

12765 +++$+++ Pastordavid +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12765 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-02 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.183425600E09 +++$+++ Drieakko, as I am copy-editing the text of this article, it appears that much of it was written by a non-native English speaker (which I assume to be you).  I hope that you will not be offended as I tweak the grammar and vocabulary throughout the article.   +++$+++ Drieakko, as I am copy-editing the text of this article, it appears that much of it was written by a non-native English speaker (which I assume to be you).  I hope that you will not be offended as I tweak the grammar and vocabulary throughout the article.  [[User:Pastordavid|Pastordavid]] 18:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
12766 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12765 +++$+++ 12765 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.183425720E09 +++$+++ Oh, please go ahead! :) -- +++$+++ :Oh, please go ahead! :) --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 18:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
12767 +++$+++ Pastordavid +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12765 +++$+++ 12766 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.183674180E09 +++$+++ Drieakko, If you have not ever taken an article through the FA process, there is some useful advice [[User:Yannismarou\/Ten rules to make an article FA|here]].  In particular, it is best to not have any other projects going while having an article up as a FA candidate, as the process can take quite a bit of time and energy, and it is best to treat all criticism of the article as suggestions for improvement and do your best to implement them.  Let me know when you are ready to nominate, and I will pitch in in any way that I can.   +++$+++ ::Drieakko, If you have not ever taken an article through the FA process, there is some useful advice [[User:Yannismarou/Ten rules to make an article FA|here]].  In particular, it is best to not have any other projects going while having an article up as a FA candidate, as the process can take quite a bit of time and energy, and it is best to treat all criticism of the article as suggestions for improvement and do your best to implement them.  Let me know when you are ready to nominate, and I will pitch in in any way that I can.  [[User:Pastordavid|Pastordavid]] 15:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
12768 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12765 +++$+++ 12767 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.183679100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for advice, I'll keep you posted! -- +++$+++ :::Thanks for advice, I'll keep you posted! --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 16:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

274912 +++$+++ Michael Hardy +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-05 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.228532580E09 +++$+++ As I expressed at [[user talk:Moondyne]] I found the discussion at [[Wikipedia:AN#User:_Moondyne_and_User:_Sarah]] mysterious.  I've interacted with \"Topology expert\" for a number of months.  I followed the link from your allegation of \"role-playing\" and I couldn't understand what you meant by that.  Can you explain?  +++$+++ As I expressed at [[user talk:Moondyne]] I found the discussion at [[Wikipedia:AN#User:_Moondyne_and_User:_Sarah]] mysterious.  I've interacted with "Topology expert" for a number of months.  I followed the link from your allegation of "role-playing" and I couldn't understand what you meant by that.  Can you explain? [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 19:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
274913 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274912 +++$+++ 274912 +++$+++ 2008-12-05 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.228544040E09 +++$+++ No, I can't, sorry, for reasons I think would be quite obvious to anyone who looked through his non-article edits.   +++$+++ :No, I can't, sorry, for reasons I think would be quite obvious to anyone who looked through his non-article edits.  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 22:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

12769 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-03 10:15:00 +++$+++ 1.183482900E09 +++$+++ Dear Drieakko, could you please have a talk with [[User:Termer]] at [[Talk:Estonian pirates]]. He is the kind of user who sees \"racist Scandinavian POVs\" against Estonians, so it might be better if you, living in Finland, discuss it with him. Best,-- +++$+++ Dear Drieakko, could you please have a talk with [[User:Termer]] at [[Talk:Estonian pirates]]. He is the kind of user who sees "racist Scandinavian POVs" against Estonians, so it might be better if you, living in Finland, discuss it with him. Best,--[[User:Berig|Berig]] 10:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
12770 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12769 +++$+++ 12769 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.183492080E09 +++$+++ Replied there, hopefully not confusing the situation more :) -- +++$+++ :Replied there, hopefully not confusing the situation more :) --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 12:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
12771 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12769 +++$+++ 12770 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.183525860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking care of it :).-- +++$+++ ::Thanks for taking care of it :).--[[User:Berig|Berig]] 22:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

274914 +++$+++ Michael Hardy +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-05 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.228548000E09 +++$+++ Well, I've seen a number of his talk page edits over a number of months, and none of those make it \"quite obvious\" why you can't explain your statement that he's \"role-playing\".  +++$+++ Well, I've seen a number of his talk page edits over a number of months, and none of those make it "quite obvious" why you can't explain your statement that he's "role-playing". [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 23:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
274915 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274914 +++$+++ 274914 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.228554600E09 +++$+++ Because I think it would violate policy and he has already accused me of \"outing\" him so perhaps you could ask him? If you can't read things like his contributions to the Wikiquette page where he sounds like a kid in a school ground choosing which side to take and work out what's going on here then that's your problem and I'm just not prepared to spell it out for you for the simple reasons of policy and basic common sense. \"Obviously a competent professional in his field\" my arse. I'm not really interested in continuing this discussion with you and I'm going offline now so won't be responding further. Thanks,   +++$+++ :Because I think it would violate policy and he has already accused me of "outing" him so perhaps you could ask him? If you can't read things like his contributions to the Wikiquette page where he sounds like a kid in a school ground choosing which side to take and work out what's going on here then that's your problem and I'm just not prepared to spell it out for you for the simple reasons of policy and basic common sense. "Obviously a competent professional in his field" my arse. I'm not really interested in continuing this discussion with you and I'm going offline now so won't be responding further. Thanks,  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:10, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
274916 +++$+++ Michael Hardy +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274914 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.228556580E09 +++$+++ I agree that he's a hothead and sometimes seems childish, but your comment that I am unable to understand his contributions a \"Wikiquette page\" seems to presuppose that I'm aware of such contributions.  I have looked at his edit history somewhat, but guessing just which of his writings you have in mind is more than I should need to do, when all you've said is \"non-article edits\".  +++$+++ ::: I agree that he's a hothead and sometimes seems childish, but your comment that I am unable to understand his contributions a "Wikiquette page" seems to presuppose that I'm aware of such contributions.  I have looked at his edit history somewhat, but guessing just which of his writings you have in mind is more than I should need to do, when all you've said is "non-article edits". [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 01:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
274917 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274914 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.228557180E09 +++$+++ Because I'm not just talking about the WQ edits, I'm talking about his non-article edits in general and the WQ edits are just one example. I reviewed a very large number of his non-article edits was left with certain beliefs regarding this editor. His school yard behaviour on WQ is just one example.  +++$+++ ::::Because I'm not just talking about the WQ edits, I'm talking about his non-article edits in general and the WQ edits are just one example. I reviewed a very large number of his non-article edits was left with certain beliefs regarding this editor. His school yard behaviour on WQ is just one example. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
274918 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274914 +++$+++ 274914 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.228555380E09 +++$+++ Wow, I just noticed that you unblocked him without bothering to discuss it on AN or with the blocking admin. That's extraordinarily poor judgment, Michael. I think there's been sufficient ArbCom cases about admins doing just that sort of thing that have resulted in desysopps that this sort of wildly maverick behaviour had been drummed out of admins. I'm really quite shocked that you would storm in and, by your own admission, not understand the block or the discussion and overturn it anyway without bothering to discuss it with the blocking administrator. I really think you need to read up on the blocking policy which quite clearly says: \"In general, administrators should avoid unblocking users without first attempting to contact the blocking administrator and discuss the matter with them. If the blocking administrator is not available, or if the administrators cannot come to an agreement, then a discussion at the administrators' noticeboard is recommended.\"  +++$+++ :Wow, I just noticed that you unblocked him without bothering to discuss it on AN or with the blocking admin. That's extraordinarily poor judgment, Michael. I think there's been sufficient ArbCom cases about admins doing just that sort of thing that have resulted in desysopps that this sort of wildly maverick behaviour had been drummed out of admins. I'm really quite shocked that you would storm in and, by your own admission, not understand the block or the discussion and overturn it anyway without bothering to discuss it with the blocking administrator. I really think you need to read up on the blocking policy which quite clearly says: "In general, administrators should avoid unblocking users without first attempting to contact the blocking administrator and discuss the matter with them. If the blocking administrator is not available, or if the administrators cannot come to an agreement, then a discussion at the administrators' noticeboard is recommended." [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

537059 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-26 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.148664420E09 +++$+++ How about including all those edits of yours that most nationalist Greeks would consider offensive?  +++$+++ How about including all those edits of yours that most nationalist Greeks would consider offensive? [[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#778">&nbsp;<span style="background:#889">N<span style="background:#99a">i<span style="background:#aab">k<span style="background:#bbc">o<span style="background:#ccd"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 10:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
537060 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537059 +++$+++ 537059 +++$+++ 2006-05-26 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.148699820E09 +++$+++ Better not, I'm afraid they're so many that if I disclose the magnitude and amount of them, not only Greek nationalists will start calling me \"Greek-hater\" (as an editor once did) ;-)-- +++$+++ :Better not, I'm afraid they're so many that if I disclose the magnitude and amount of them, not only Greek nationalists will start calling me "Greek-hater" (as an editor once did) ;-)--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 20:17, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

12774 +++$+++ Pudeo +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-06 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.183746120E09 +++$+++ By the way, would you consider reformatting the citations in the article? Such as in [[Finnish Civil War]], Reference books in different section, and notes only having websites and page references to books. I also implemented [[:Template:Harvard citation]] to the Finnish Civil War article. See the article, if you'd like to have it. It takes quite some space though, and isn't really that better if you format the references and notes properly manually. I also nominated Finnish Civil War to FA and main page featured article, so if you want it to main page, you should immediately make a short main page description and  put it here [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article\/requests]]. It took months for the FCW to get on main page, and now the queue is even longer. Anyway, the article looks good to me, I will claim my support later. -- +++$+++ By the way, would you consider reformatting the citations in the article? Such as in [[Finnish Civil War]], Reference books in different section, and notes only having websites and page references to books. I also implemented [[:Template:Harvard citation]] to the Finnish Civil War article. See the article, if you'd like to have it. It takes quite some space though, and isn't really that better if you format the references and notes properly manually. I also nominated Finnish Civil War to FA and main page featured article, so if you want it to main page, you should immediately make a short main page description and  put it here [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests]]. It took months for the FCW to get on main page, and now the queue is even longer. Anyway, the article looks good to me, I will claim my support later. --[[User:Pudeo|Pudeo]] ([[User_talk:Pudeo|''Talk'']]) 11:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
12775 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12774 +++$+++ 12774 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.183746480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for advice, I think I'll take it into usage. The current way [[Bishop Henry]] is referenced is a bit messy for this part. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for advice, I think I'll take it into usage. The current way [[Bishop Henry]] is referenced is a bit messy for this part. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 11:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

274919 +++$+++ Jehochman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274919 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-06 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.228604340E09 +++$+++ Sarah, <s>I see that you have about 750 content edits over the last year, the vast majority of which are merely reverts of vandalism.  I recommend you try to remember what's important here: content, not politics.  That's my concern with your activity.  Now,<\/s> would you be willing to share with me why you are concerned about my activities?  +++$+++ Sarah, <s>I see that you have about 750 content edits over the last year, the vast majority of which are merely reverts of vandalism.  I recommend you try to remember what's important here: content, not politics.  That's my concern with your activity.  Now,</s> would you be willing to share with me why you are concerned about my activities? [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 14:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
274920 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274919 +++$+++ 274919 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.228643880E09 +++$+++ Why am I concerned about your activities? Because you have requested the community assign you to the Arbitration Committee and I don't trust you at all; more than that, I ''mistrust'' you. You having access to the ArbCom mailing list and its archives, the ArbCom wiki, checkuser, oversight and so forth is simply unacceptable in my opinion. I am grateful that overall the community appears to agree that you are not an acceptable candidate because were you to be elected to the committee I would seriously be considering whether I could continue to support this project (and I don't say that lightly - there is literally no other candidate this year that I feel that strongly about). Let me be really clear here: I do not trust you at all. I do not trust you with the additional tools. I especially do not trust you with the privileged information that passes through the committee. I do not trust you with the political influence that goes hand-in-hand with the committee. It's as simple as that. For as long as I see you trying to stir up drama, meddling, using back channels to try to influence people and desperately trying to blow with the breeze of popular opinion I will not trust you with any elevated access.  +++$+++ :Why am I concerned about your activities? Because you have requested the community assign you to the Arbitration Committee and I don't trust you at all; more than that, I ''mistrust'' you. You having access to the ArbCom mailing list and its archives, the ArbCom wiki, checkuser, oversight and so forth is simply unacceptable in my opinion. I am grateful that overall the community appears to agree that you are not an acceptable candidate because were you to be elected to the committee I would seriously be considering whether I could continue to support this project (and I don't say that lightly - there is literally no other candidate this year that I feel that strongly about). Let me be really clear here: I do not trust you at all. I do not trust you with the additional tools. I especially do not trust you with the privileged information that passes through the committee. I do not trust you with the political influence that goes hand-in-hand with the committee. It's as simple as that. For as long as I see you trying to stir up drama, meddling, using back channels to try to influence people and desperately trying to blow with the breeze of popular opinion I will not trust you with any elevated access. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
274921 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274919 +++$+++ 274920 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.228645860E09 +++$+++ For my 2 cents Jehochman I have also voted in opposition to you (as have 104 others to date) and I think Sarah has given you a most comprehensive answer here.  I'm sorry but it appears particularly underhanded for you to come here with your question above as a direct correlation of her vote at the arbcom elections and it smacks of a vindictive pursuit!  Sarah is extra-ordinarily well regarded and trusted at the project; she has an extra-ordinary positive history; she is entitled to vote in whatever way she likes; and she is not accountable to anyone for the amount of edits she has made or is making.  Indeed if she had only made one useful edit; one useful admin action; or made only one !vote; her continuation at this project coupled with her well-thought out honesty (even if against the desires of administrators she has nominated) is a very worthwhile addition. To my mind there are many many users at this project that want her to continue as a part of it and I would ask that you do her the courtesy of leaving her alone as she has requested of you now many times.-- +++$+++ :*For my 2 cents Jehochman I have also voted in opposition to you (as have 104 others to date) and I think Sarah has given you a most comprehensive answer here.  I'm sorry but it appears particularly underhanded for you to come here with your question above as a direct correlation of her vote at the arbcom elections and it smacks of a vindictive pursuit!  Sarah is extra-ordinarily well regarded and trusted at the project; she has an extra-ordinary positive history; she is entitled to vote in whatever way she likes; and she is not accountable to anyone for the amount of edits she has made or is making.  Indeed if she had only made one useful edit; one useful admin action; or made only one !vote; her continuation at this project coupled with her well-thought out honesty (even if against the desires of administrators she has nominated) is a very worthwhile addition. To my mind there are many many users at this project that want her to continue as a part of it and I would ask that you do her the courtesy of leaving her alone as she has requested of you now many times.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 02:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
274922 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274919 +++$+++ 274921 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.228657380E09 +++$+++ The original post in this thread was the final straw in convincing me this sort of attitude is not what we need on ArbCom. There's a definite condescension there that reminded me rather too much of some of the self-aggrandising comments I'd seen on IRC a couple of months ago, and does seem ironic considering how many dramas the original poster has either initiated or become the centre of. As someone aware of Sarah's significant offline activities in furtherance of the project, I pretty much second everything VS just said.  +++$+++ :**The original post in this thread was the final straw in convincing me this sort of attitude is not what we need on ArbCom. There's a definite condescension there that reminded me rather too much of some of the self-aggrandising comments I'd seen on IRC a couple of months ago, and does seem ironic considering how many dramas the original poster has either initiated or become the centre of. As someone aware of Sarah's significant offline activities in furtherance of the project, I pretty much second everything VS just said. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 05:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
274923 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274919 +++$+++ 274921 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.228721040E09 +++$+++ What my critic failed to observe is that I haven't made many edits this year in general. If you look at my last 2000 edits, it goes all the way back to May. And frankly, the project is lucky to have got 750 mostly \"merely reverts of vandalism\" out of me this year given I have spent most of the year on a succession of wikibreaks. I am quite certain that [[Andrew Laming]] would say that my mostly \"merely reverts of vandalism\" this year were gratefully received and if that were the only article I edited this year then I think my edits have been worthwhile. Surely if a user makes only one useful edit to an article and they aren't otherwise disruptive or destructive it is worth having them around? No wonder so many people leave the project feeling unappreciated and disillusioned with attitudes like Hochman's on display.  +++$+++ :::What my critic failed to observe is that I haven't made many edits this year in general. If you look at my last 2000 edits, it goes all the way back to May. And frankly, the project is lucky to have got 750 mostly "merely reverts of vandalism" out of me this year given I have spent most of the year on a succession of wikibreaks. I am quite certain that [[Andrew Laming]] would say that my mostly "merely reverts of vandalism" this year were gratefully received and if that were the only article I edited this year then I think my edits have been worthwhile. Surely if a user makes only one useful edit to an article and they aren't otherwise disruptive or destructive it is worth having them around? No wonder so many people leave the project feeling unappreciated and disillusioned with attitudes like Hochman's on display. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 23:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

12776 +++$+++ Jackturner3 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12776 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-06 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.183756560E09 +++$+++ Just so that you know, the article [[Calendar of Saints (Lutheran)]] has been split into two articles, one with the original title and another with the title of [[Liturgical calendar (Lutheran)]].  The Calendar of Saints has gone up for Featured List review, but failed after only garnering three votes (three support, none oppose).  I wanted to let you know, since it was at your suggestion that the article be split into the two current articles, so that when the article is renominated (hopefully later today or on Monday), you will be able to voice your opinion.  I will let you know when the list is renominatied.  Liturgical Calendar (Lutheran) has already been nominated for GA status and is currently under review. --  +++$+++ Just so that you know, the article [[Calendar of Saints (Lutheran)]] has been split into two articles, one with the original title and another with the title of [[Liturgical calendar (Lutheran)]].  The Calendar of Saints has gone up for Featured List review, but failed after only garnering three votes (three support, none oppose).  I wanted to let you know, since it was at your suggestion that the article be split into the two current articles, so that when the article is renominated (hopefully later today or on Monday), you will be able to voice your opinion.  I will let you know when the list is renominatied.  Liturgical Calendar (Lutheran) has already been nominated for GA status and is currently under review. -- [[User:Jackturner3|jackturner3]] 14:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
12777 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12776 +++$+++ 12776 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.183756740E09 +++$+++ Ok, please let me know as you renominate it. It is unfortunate if lack of interest fails nominations. -- +++$+++ :Ok, please let me know as you renominate it. It is unfortunate if lack of interest fails nominations. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 14:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
12778 +++$+++ Jackturner3 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12776 +++$+++ 12777 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.184190060E09 +++$+++ OK, the list has been renominated.  You can find the discussion for it at [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/Calendar of Saints (Lutheran)]].  Thanks --  +++$+++ ::OK, the list has been renominated.  You can find the discussion for it at [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Calendar of Saints (Lutheran)]].  Thanks -- [[User:Jackturner3|jackturner3]] 14:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
12779 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12776 +++$+++ 12778 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.184195100E09 +++$+++ Gave my comments there now. -- +++$+++ :::Gave my comments there now. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 16:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

537065 +++$+++ Apostolos Margaritis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537065 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-27 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.148762280E09 +++$+++ I do not endorse them but you should be aware that there're voices (see [http:\/\/www.legionario.org\/CHI%20SIAMO.htm link]) who are asking for Rhodos and Dodecanesse to be returned to Italy.  +++$+++ I do not endorse them but you should be aware that there're voices (see [http://www.legionario.org/CHI%20SIAMO.htm link]) who are asking for Rhodos and Dodecanesse to be returned to Italy. [[User:Apostolos Margaritis|Apostolos Margaritis]] 13:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
537066 +++$+++ Miskin +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537065 +++$+++ 537065 +++$+++ 2006-05-28 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.148803800E09 +++$+++ Wow this page is like a forum. Anyway I just wanted to state that calling other people \"X-phile\" or \"X-licker\" is one of Apostolos' favourite psychological attacks. He recently said the same things to [[user:Dahn]], and I think he used the exact same wording.  +++$+++ :Wow this page is like a forum. Anyway I just wanted to state that calling other people "X-phile" or "X-licker" is one of Apostolos' favourite psychological attacks. He recently said the same things to [[user:Dahn]], and I think he used the exact same wording. [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 01:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
537067 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537065 +++$+++ 537066 +++$+++ 2006-05-28 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.148806800E09 +++$+++ To Margaritis: i come from those villages (i visit my ancestral village every summer and i have visited those villages many many times in my life!). those 'faithfuls' exist only in your imagination... Unfortunately for u, u came across someone who has many links with the 'vlachohoria' of Pindus, thus your lies and extreme POV has been revealed... -- +++$+++ ::To Margaritis: i come from those villages (i visit my ancestral village every summer and i have visited those villages many many times in my life!). those 'faithfuls' exist only in your imagination... Unfortunately for u, u came across someone who has many links with the 'vlachohoria' of Pindus, thus your lies and extreme POV has been revealed... --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 02:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
537068 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537065 +++$+++ 537066 +++$+++ 2006-05-28 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.148807100E09 +++$+++ Aldux, sorry for occupying your page for such bull***t. Tu cognoscis, ego sum tuum frater:).(simplice latinitate, right?)..(in the way Italians and Greeks use it: una fatsa, una ratsa). Ciao! -- +++$+++ ::Aldux, sorry for occupying your page for such bull***t. Tu cognoscis, ego sum tuum frater:).(simplice latinitate, right?)..(in the way Italians and Greeks use it: una fatsa, una ratsa). Ciao! --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 02:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

12780 +++$+++ 84.251.73.218 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12780 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-08 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.183915260E09 +++$+++ Why have you removed my edit in the [[Finland]] article? +++$+++ Why have you removed my edit in the [[Finland]] article?[[User:84.251.73.218|84.251.73.218]] 10:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
12781 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12780 +++$+++ 12780 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.183915380E09 +++$+++ It was a very strong statement and without a reference. -- +++$+++ :It was a very strong statement and without a reference. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 10:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

12782 +++$+++ Leolaursen +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12782 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-11 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.184209500E09 +++$+++ Hi Drieakko. Would you please explain why You undid my attempt to disambiguate \"Lapland\" [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Laponia&diff=143893911&oldid=143846036]. Is it really preferable to keep the link to the disambiguation page? or can we find a better article to link to? -- +++$+++ Hi Drieakko. Would you please explain why You undid my attempt to disambiguate "Lapland" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laponia&diff=143893911&oldid=143846036]. Is it really preferable to keep the link to the disambiguation page? or can we find a better article to link to? --[[User:Leolaursen|Leo Laursen]] <span style="font-size:50%;position:relative;bottom:0.5em;">( [[User talk:Leolaursen|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Leolaursen|C]] )</span> 20:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
12783 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12782 +++$+++ 12782 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.184210280E09 +++$+++ In most of its meanings, Laponia is just \"Lapland\" in Latin. In that meaning, it is as disambiguous, and needs to point to a disambiguous page. -- +++$+++ :In most of its meanings, Laponia is just "Lapland" in Latin. In that meaning, it is as disambiguous, and needs to point to a disambiguous page. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 20:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
12784 +++$+++ Leolaursen +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12782 +++$+++ 12783 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.184213040E09 +++$+++ OK, I can accept that. In my view the meaning is imprecise rather than ambiguous, that was why I chose to link to the general area, but he subject is rather confusing, I think :-) -- +++$+++ ::OK, I can accept that. In my view the meaning is imprecise rather than ambiguous, that was why I chose to link to the general area, but he subject is rather confusing, I think :-) --[[User:Leolaursen|Leo Laursen]] <span style="font-size:50%;position:relative;bottom:0.5em;">( [[User talk:Leolaursen|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Leolaursen|C]] )</span> 21:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

274928 +++$+++ Crazyharp81602 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-12 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.229084220E09 +++$+++ Hello, Sarah. Glad to meet you. My username is Crazyharp81602 and I need your help to undelete an article [[Mainframe (C.O.P.S.]] I made that's been deleted for no reason other than it's not linked to some reliable resources. It '''has''' been link to reliable resources, but according to them, it wasn't. It's not fair that the article is the only article of mine that has been deleted while all the rest of the articles about [[C.O.P.S. (TV series)]] haven't been touched. And they appeared to have been not linked to some reliable sources just like the article and they have to single the Mainframe page out! Frustrating. As a matter of fact the only reliable sources I can think of is showing off links to YouTube C.O.P.S. videos and [http:\/\/copshq.generalsjoes.com\/media\/cartoon\/characters\/mainframe.htm this page] from COPS HQ website. Sorry I didn't bother to put the COPS HQ link to the article. If I would've put the link there, I would've been able to keep the article. Could you do me a favor and salvage the article so I can make it more reliable and put the link in the article please? Thanks.-- +++$+++ Hello, Sarah. Glad to meet you. My username is Crazyharp81602 and I need your help to undelete an article [[Mainframe (C.O.P.S.]] I made that's been deleted for no reason other than it's not linked to some reliable resources. It '''has''' been link to reliable resources, but according to them, it wasn't. It's not fair that the article is the only article of mine that has been deleted while all the rest of the articles about [[C.O.P.S. (TV series)]] haven't been touched. And they appeared to have been not linked to some reliable sources just like the article and they have to single the Mainframe page out! Frustrating. As a matter of fact the only reliable sources I can think of is showing off links to YouTube C.O.P.S. videos and [http://copshq.generalsjoes.com/media/cartoon/characters/mainframe.htm this page] from COPS HQ website. Sorry I didn't bother to put the COPS HQ link to the article. If I would've put the link there, I would've been able to keep the article. Could you do me a favor and salvage the article so I can make it more reliable and put the link in the article please? Thanks.--[[User:Crazyharp81602|Crazyharp81602]] ([[User talk:Crazyharp81602|talk]]) 04:17, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
274929 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274928 +++$+++ 274928 +++$+++ 2008-12-13 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.229163540E09 +++$+++ (after edit conflict)Hi Crazyharp81602. Sorry but I can't undelete that article as it has been deleted via an [[WP:AFD|AFD]] discussion. If you think the AFD was closed incorrectly or that there is new information or new [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that were not available during the period of the AFD then you will have to take it through [[WP:DRV|deletion review]]. I have, however, emailed you a copy of the text so you can work on the article if you want to, but please be aware that simply reposting it without a DRV will result in the article being speedy deleted as a repost of an AFD deleted article. Sorry I can't be of more help, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC) PS When you give someone a link please be sure you give them the correct one as that link to the article was incorrect. Thanks -  +++$+++ :(after edit conflict)Hi Crazyharp81602. Sorry but I can't undelete that article as it has been deleted via an [[WP:AFD|AFD]] discussion. If you think the AFD was closed incorrectly or that there is new information or new [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that were not available during the period of the AFD then you will have to take it through [[WP:DRV|deletion review]]. I have, however, emailed you a copy of the text so you can work on the article if you want to, but please be aware that simply reposting it without a DRV will result in the article being speedy deleted as a repost of an AFD deleted article. Sorry I can't be of more help, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC) PS When you give someone a link please be sure you give them the correct one as that link to the article was incorrect. Thanks - [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

89512 +++$+++ Milkunderwood +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89512 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-16 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.305609600E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Milkunderwood|Milkunderwood]] ([[User talk:Milkunderwood|talk]]) 22:20, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
89513 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89512 +++$+++ 89512 +++$+++ 2011-05-16 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.305611160E09 +++$+++ All very good suggestions, and despite your protestations you are clearly capable of making at least some of these changes yourself!\u2014 +++$+++ :All very good suggestions, and despite your protestations you are clearly capable of making at least some of these changes yourself!—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 22:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
89514 +++$+++ Milkunderwood +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89512 +++$+++ 89513 +++$+++ 2011-05-16 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.305615120E09 +++$+++ Well you did the easy one, fixing the lede. I've linked ''parts'' to ''Part (music)'', but don't know how to specify the first definition only, since that article isn't sectioned. For explanation & discussion, I'm way over my head.  +++$+++ ::Well you did the easy one, fixing the lede. I've linked ''parts'' to ''Part (music)'', but don't know how to specify the first definition only, since that article isn't sectioned. For explanation & discussion, I'm way over my head. [[User:Milkunderwood|Milkunderwood]] ([[User talk:Milkunderwood|talk]]) 23:52, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

12787 +++$+++ Jommala +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-19 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.184889420E09 +++$+++ Why you first delete unofficial finnish name and then edit back unofficial swedish name? Why, are you paid from swedish part? -- +++$+++ Why you first delete unofficial finnish name and then edit back unofficial swedish name? Why, are you paid from swedish part? --[[User:Jommala|Jommala]] 16:57, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
12788 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12787 +++$+++ 12787 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.184889540E09 +++$+++ Kindly take part in the [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Finland#Naming_convention_policy_poll|poll]] before starting massive edits on your own right. -- +++$+++ :Kindly take part in the [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Finland#Naming_convention_policy_poll|poll]] before starting massive edits on your own right. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 16:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
12789 +++$+++ Jommala +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12787 +++$+++ 12788 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.184905020E09 +++$+++ I know you are [[User: Silenzio]] sockpuppet! And I have proves of it! -- +++$+++ ::I know you are [[User: Silenzio]] sockpuppet! And I have proves of it! --[[User:Jommala|Jommala]] 21:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
12790 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12787 +++$+++ 12789 +++$+++ 2007-07-20 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.184949180E09 +++$+++ Please contact Wikipedia administrators to get your suspicions sorted out. -- +++$+++ :::Please contact Wikipedia administrators to get your suspicions sorted out. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 09:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

274932 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-19 08:16:00 +++$+++ 1.229703360E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know my support is unaltered and unalterable.  Please come to my talk page or email me at any time you will always be welcome - remember the reasonable are always watching and they can always tell the truthful from those who only provide lip service.-- +++$+++ Just to let you know my support is unaltered and unalterable.  Please come to my talk page or email me at any time you will always be welcome - remember the reasonable are always watching and they can always tell the truthful from those who only provide lip service.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 08:16, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
274933 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274932 +++$+++ 274932 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.229773560E09 +++$+++ Thank you Steve, I do appreciate that very much. I'm really embarrassed about my incompetence as a correspondent and I'm sorry I still haven't responded to your last email properly. If it makes you feel any better, it's a common problem I've had this year with replying to longer non-WP emails in general and not just with you. User:ElinorD can attest to this, too, so don't feel that it's just you. :) Anyway, I was actually thinking about this when I was driving home yesterday and how I need to reply to you before Christmas, so I put emailing you in the number two spot on my list of things to do before Christmas, behind putting up my parent's Christmas tree. :) Keep an eye out because I'll be doing their tree this weekend so you should receive an email before Sunday night ESDT - don't worry I won't be claiming UTC time to try to get extra wiggle room! :p  +++$+++ :Thank you Steve, I do appreciate that very much. I'm really embarrassed about my incompetence as a correspondent and I'm sorry I still haven't responded to your last email properly. If it makes you feel any better, it's a common problem I've had this year with replying to longer non-WP emails in general and not just with you. User:ElinorD can attest to this, too, so don't feel that it's just you. :) Anyway, I was actually thinking about this when I was driving home yesterday and how I need to reply to you before Christmas, so I put emailing you in the number two spot on my list of things to do before Christmas, behind putting up my parent's Christmas tree. :) Keep an eye out because I'll be doing their tree this weekend so you should receive an email before Sunday night ESDT - don't worry I won't be claiming UTC time to try to get extra wiggle room! :p [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:46, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
274934 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274932 +++$+++ 274933 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.229783460E09 +++$+++ I look forward to your email - even though you have no reason to be embarrassed or to apologise.  Your words here and there whether in support of or gently redirecting me have more than made up for any personal greetings. :) -- +++$+++ ::I look forward to your email - even though you have no reason to be embarrassed or to apologise.  Your words here and there whether in support of or gently redirecting me have more than made up for any personal greetings. :) --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 06:31, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
274935 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274932 +++$+++ 274934 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.229885460E09 +++$+++ Please sit down, Steve, I don't want you to get such a shock that you fall over! But {{done}} all your questions and more have been answered in a very long email which is now waiting for you!  +++$+++ :::Please sit down, Steve, I don't want you to get such a shock that you fall over! But {{done}} all your questions and more have been answered in a very long email which is now waiting for you! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

12791 +++$+++ Hauskalainen +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12791 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-23 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.185211800E09 +++$+++ Saying that Finland was \"part of Sweden\" is like saying that \"Ireland was part of the United Kingdom\" or that the \"Karelian Isthmus is part of Russia\". Though a political reality, it loses the sense that the area is largely under the influence of people other than the natives of that region. Surely \"ruled by Sweden\" conveys that reality. -- +++$+++ Saying that Finland was "part of Sweden" is like saying that "Ireland was part of the United Kingdom" or that the "Karelian Isthmus is part of Russia". Though a political reality, it loses the sense that the area is largely under the influence of people other than the natives of that region. Surely "ruled by Sweden" conveys that reality. --[[User:Hauskalainen|Tom]] 10:30, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
12792 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12791 +++$+++ 12791 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.185212160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for having interest on this matter. There is however a clear difference between areas that were part of Sweden and areas that were ruled by Sweden. Finland was a part of the [[Sweden Proper]] already in the 14th century until 1809 when it was annexed by Russia. A person living in Finland had the same legal rights than a person living e.g. in Stockholm. However, e.g. Estonia, Livonia, German towns and Kexholm County were not parts of Sweden, but ruled by it. Their inhabitants did not have the same rights as the people in the Sweden Proper, as the areas were treated more or less as colonies. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for having interest on this matter. There is however a clear difference between areas that were part of Sweden and areas that were ruled by Sweden. Finland was a part of the [[Sweden Proper]] already in the 14th century until 1809 when it was annexed by Russia. A person living in Finland had the same legal rights than a person living e.g. in Stockholm. However, e.g. Estonia, Livonia, German towns and Kexholm County were not parts of Sweden, but ruled by it. Their inhabitants did not have the same rights as the people in the Sweden Proper, as the areas were treated more or less as colonies. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 10:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

12793 +++$+++ Tellervo +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12793 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-27 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.185548700E09 +++$+++ I have restored the \"speculation\" you have removed. Without some general inferences one cannot write the history of very early times combined with scarcity of sources. Removals should be discussed first on the discussion page. -- +++$+++ I have restored the "speculation" you have removed. Without some general inferences one cannot write the history of very early times combined with scarcity of sources. Removals should be discussed first on the discussion page. --[[User:Tellervo|Tellervo]] 08:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
12794 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12793 +++$+++ 12793 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.185549480E09 +++$+++ Claiming it to be \"certain\" that Finns and Karelians took part in the Varangian trips is incorrect and will be removed unless you provide a source for it. The whole idea is unnecessary speculation and needs not be in Wikipedia. -- +++$+++ :Claiming it to be "certain" that Finns and Karelians took part in the Varangian trips is incorrect and will be removed unless you provide a source for it. The whole idea is unnecessary speculation and needs not be in Wikipedia. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 08:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

12795 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-03 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.186185960E09 +++$+++ Hi Drieakko, I am in a disagreement with a new user about when a disambiguation tag may be useful[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Haguna]. Pershaps, you have an opinion in the issue.-- +++$+++ Hi Drieakko, I am in a disagreement with a new user about when a disambiguation tag may be useful[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Haguna]. Pershaps, you have an opinion in the issue.--[[User:Berig|Berig]] 17:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
12796 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12795 +++$+++ 12795 +++$+++ 2007-08-05 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.186343040E09 +++$+++ Gave my 2c on the talk page. -- +++$+++ :Gave my 2c on the talk page. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 12:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

12798 +++$+++  +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-13 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.187051340E09 +++$+++ Where is the report? I can't find it. I think that [[User talk:88.230.23.197|88.230.23.197]] is a sock. It's fairly obvious once you look at the edit summaries.  +++$+++ Where is the report? I can't find it. I think that [[User talk:88.230.23.197|88.230.23.197]] is a sock. It's fairly obvious once you look at the edit summaries. [[User:SFGiants|<font color="orange">¿SFGi</font><font color="black">Д</font><font color="orange">nts!</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:SFGiants|¿Complain!]] [[Special:Contributions/SFGiants|¿Analyze!]] [[Wikipedia:Editor review/SFGiants 2|¿Review!]] </sup> 17:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
12799 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12798 +++$+++ 12798 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.187051580E09 +++$+++ Which report are you looking for? Behavior of his earlier incarnation was reported to the Admin Incident Board sometime ago by me, after that I have just seen his sock puppets go down. -- +++$+++ :Which report are you looking for? Behavior of his earlier incarnation was reported to the Admin Incident Board sometime ago by me, after that I have just seen his sock puppets go down. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 17:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
12800 +++$+++  +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12798 +++$+++ 12799 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.187051760E09 +++$+++ I see. So what should I do with this sockpuppet?  +++$+++ ::I see. So what should I do with this sockpuppet? [[User:SFGiants|<font color="orange">¿SFGi</font><font color="black">Д</font><font color="orange">nts!</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:SFGiants|¿Complain!]] [[Special:Contributions/SFGiants|¿Analyze!]] [[Wikipedia:Editor review/SFGiants 2|¿Review!]] </sup> 17:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
12801 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12798 +++$+++ 12800 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.187051880E09 +++$+++ Ignorance is usually the best way to deal with them. -- +++$+++ :::Ignorance is usually the best way to deal with them. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 17:38, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
12802 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12798 +++$+++ 12800 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.187052000E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=148252181 Here] is the original incident post. -- +++$+++ :::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=148252181 Here] is the original incident post. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 17:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

526421 +++$+++ Kittybrewster +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-14 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.166163600E09 +++$+++ [[Rennell Rodd, 1st Baron Rennell of Rodd]] to [[Rennell Rodd, 1st Baron Rennell]] -  +++$+++ [[Rennell Rodd, 1st Baron Rennell of Rodd]] to [[Rennell Rodd, 1st Baron Rennell]] - [[User:Kittybrewster|Kittybrewster]] 22:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
526422 +++$+++ Kittybrewster +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526421 +++$+++ 526421 +++$+++ 2006-12-16 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.166256480E09 +++$+++ Yes please undo the move I did. I am told I was wrong to make it.  -  +++$+++ :Yes please undo the move I did. I am told I was wrong to make it.  - [[User:Kittybrewster|Kittybrewster]] 00:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

537088 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537088 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-29 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.148930820E09 +++$+++ As you are an administrator of wikipedia please tell me what do you think about macedonism as a term, thanx.  +++$+++ As you are an administrator of wikipedia please tell me what do you think about macedonism as a term, thanx. [[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 12:27, 29 may 2006 (UTC)
537089 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537088 +++$+++ 537088 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.149106860E09 +++$+++ OK, thanx anyway. I see you are much interested in history research. But tell me, don't you think that ''macedonism'' should be regarded as the terms ''germanism'', ''helenism'', ''portugalism'', actualy the influence of their cultures. I think that macedonism has to be defined in the article as. And than to write about using macedonism.  +++$+++ :OK, thanx anyway. I see you are much interested in history research. But tell me, don't you think that ''macedonism'' should be regarded as the terms ''germanism'', ''helenism'', ''portugalism'', actualy the influence of their cultures. I think that macedonism has to be defined in the article as. And than to write about using macedonism. [[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 13:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

274945 +++$+++ LoveWikis +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274945 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-09 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.231510920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:LoveWikis|LoveWikis]] ([[User talk:LoveWikis|talk]]) 06:22, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
274946 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274945 +++$+++ 274945 +++$+++ 2009-01-10 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.231641300E09 +++$+++ I will let James handle your request as there's no point in multiple people wasting time looking into this, but I will just tell you that it was deleted as \"blatant advertising\" and not on the basis of notability. Also, I've removed your request from [[User talk:Cherane]] as that user has made only one edit to Wikipedia and is obviously not an administrator.  +++$+++ :I will let James handle your request as there's no point in multiple people wasting time looking into this, but I will just tell you that it was deleted as "blatant advertising" and not on the basis of notability. Also, I've removed your request from [[User talk:Cherane]] as that user has made only one edit to Wikipedia and is obviously not an administrator. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 18:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

482731 +++$+++ W.marsh +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482731 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.176272040E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/User:\u3044\u3061\u3060 \u3071\u306d\u3069]], not really sure what's going on there but figured since you protected the user page you might want to talk a look at this thing. Thanks. -- +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User:いちだ ぱねど]], not really sure what's going on there but figured since you protected the user page you might want to talk a look at this thing. Thanks. --[[User:W.marsh|W.marsh]] 23:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
482732 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482731 +++$+++ 482731 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.176281100E09 +++$+++ I protected it as part of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=99970434&oldid=99969216 an AIV report] about a little mini-war at that user page.  As far as the sock notice on the page, I would have to defer to {{admin|Redvers}} who blocked {{user|\u3044\u3061\u3060 \u3071\u306d\u3069}} for sockpuppetry.  I'm not sure why this new user wants to delete the user page so bad but it seems pointless to me.  Personally I'd leave it there unless Redvers said otherwise but you can make that call.  \u2014 +++$+++ :I protected it as part of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=99970434&oldid=99969216 an AIV report] about a little mini-war at that user page.  As far as the sock notice on the page, I would have to defer to {{admin|Redvers}} who blocked {{user|いちだ ぱねど}} for sockpuppetry.  I'm not sure why this new user wants to delete the user page so bad but it seems pointless to me.  Personally I'd leave it there unless Redvers said otherwise but you can make that call.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 01:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

12804 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12804 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-25 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.188110280E09 +++$+++ I noticed that there were two people editing and I didn't look to see who did what so this may not apply to you. I've cleaned up the links (and made no other changes to the article) and just wanted to let you know the following. In the body of the article there should only be one link to other articles. In other words the first time that \"Somaliland\" is in the article link it, but not every time it appears.  Also, please don't make direct links into redirects. The following are direct links to articles: [[Jibrell Ali Salad]] (Jibrell Ali Salad Aadan), [[Warsangali]] (Warsangeli), [[Mohamud Muse Hersi]] (Adde Musa), [[Dhulbahante]] (Dulbahante), [[Majeerteen]] (Majerteen), [[Las Khorey]] (Laasqoray) and [[Ceerigaabo]] (Erigavo). Also watch out for Dhahar which is just a redirect to Sanaag and not a link to the town.  +++$+++ I noticed that there were two people editing and I didn't look to see who did what so this may not apply to you. I've cleaned up the links (and made no other changes to the article) and just wanted to let you know the following. In the body of the article there should only be one link to other articles. In other words the first time that "Somaliland" is in the article link it, but not every time it appears.  Also, please don't make direct links into redirects. The following are direct links to articles: [[Jibrell Ali Salad]] (Jibrell Ali Salad Aadan), [[Warsangali]] (Warsangeli), [[Mohamud Muse Hersi]] (Adde Musa), [[Dhulbahante]] (Dulbahante), [[Majeerteen]] (Majerteen), [[Las Khorey]] (Laasqoray) and [[Ceerigaabo]] (Erigavo). Also watch out for Dhahar which is just a redirect to Sanaag and not a link to the town. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 23:38, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
12805 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12804 +++$+++ 12804 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.188113040E09 +++$+++ Ok; those points seem to concern someone else. -- +++$+++ :Ok; those points seem to concern someone else. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 00:24, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
12806 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12804 +++$+++ 12805 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.188114300E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Just ignore it then.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. Just ignore it then. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 00:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

274951 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274951 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-10 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.234294200E09 +++$+++ The aternative spelling of Trimbole\/Trimboli ''does'' see some mileage it seems... see [http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/nsw\/stories\/s608468.htm here] and [http:\/\/www.parliament.nsw.gov.au\/prod\/parlment\/hansart.nsf\/V3Key\/LA20071026006 here] for just two examples. Long time, no wiki-communication between us I was thinking just earlier when I saw your username scroll past my watchlist... hope things are going well for you in the new year. --  +++$+++ The aternative spelling of Trimbole/Trimboli ''does'' see some mileage it seems... see [http://www.abc.net.au/nsw/stories/s608468.htm here] and [http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hansart.nsf/V3Key/LA20071026006 here] for just two examples. Long time, no wiki-communication between us I was thinking just earlier when I saw your username scroll past my watchlist... hope things are going well for you in the new year. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 11:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
274952 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274951 +++$+++ 274951 +++$+++ 2009-02-11 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.234364700E09 +++$+++ Thanks Longair, I hope you have a great new year, too. I haven't really been editing much over the last year so that would be why you haven't seen me around much. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks Longair, I hope you have a great new year, too. I haven't really been editing much over the last year so that would be why you haven't seen me around much. :) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

12808 +++$+++ Pudeo +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12808 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-26 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.190840820E09 +++$+++ Hello, as you have great amount of source material available on \"early Finnish history\" and obviously are a great editor in that area, would you mind to drop in in the Finnish Wikipedia? We've had discussion about whether the \"Swedish rule in Finland\" started in 1150 or 1250 [[:fi:Keskustelu:Suomen_historia]]. Discussion about the crusades [[:fi:Keskustelu:Ruotsin_vallan_aika_Suomessa#Kristinusko_saapuu-kappale]] and so on. Since you have written articles [[Early Finnish wars]] and [[Finnish-Novgorodian wars]] here, may I invite you to help us, if we create an article there, perhaps with the title \"Suomen muinaiset sodat\". Finnish Wikipedia lacks much information on these, and only has controversial stuff split in \"Suomen kuninkaat\" or \"Kvenland\". I noticed that you're a member on Finnish Wikipedia, but you haven't edited in ages. We'd really need an editor like you there too. So please, if helping us to create an article on early Finnish wars in fiwiki or anything interests you, drop by. -- +++$+++ Hello, as you have great amount of source material available on "early Finnish history" and obviously are a great editor in that area, would you mind to drop in in the Finnish Wikipedia? We've had discussion about whether the "Swedish rule in Finland" started in 1150 or 1250 [[:fi:Keskustelu:Suomen_historia]]. Discussion about the crusades [[:fi:Keskustelu:Ruotsin_vallan_aika_Suomessa#Kristinusko_saapuu-kappale]] and so on. Since you have written articles [[Early Finnish wars]] and [[Finnish-Novgorodian wars]] here, may I invite you to help us, if we create an article there, perhaps with the title "Suomen muinaiset sodat". Finnish Wikipedia lacks much information on these, and only has controversial stuff split in "Suomen kuninkaat" or "Kvenland". I noticed that you're a member on Finnish Wikipedia, but you haven't edited in ages. We'd really need an editor like you there too. So please, if helping us to create an article on early Finnish wars in fiwiki or anything interests you, drop by. --[[User:Pudeo|Pudeo]][[User talk:Pudeo|⺮]] 14:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
12809 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12808 +++$+++ 12808 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.190841300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for compliments. My edits recently to English Wikipedia have dropped quite a lot because I am very busy at my daily work (oh well even I need to get living from somewhere). But if I find time to drop by also to Finnish Wikipedia I definitely start from those subjects. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for compliments. My edits recently to English Wikipedia have dropped quite a lot because I am very busy at my daily work (oh well even I need to get living from somewhere). But if I find time to drop by also to Finnish Wikipedia I definitely start from those subjects. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 14:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
12810 +++$+++ Pudeo +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12808 +++$+++ 12809 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.190862420E09 +++$+++ Alright then, keep it in mind. By the way, did you already see that Bishop Henry will be featured on main page on 28th? Did you even suggest it? I mean wow, [[T-26 tank]] has been in queue for over a half year, and it took ages for [[Finnish Civil War]]. Good thing 28th is still Friday, so a lot of people will see it from their schools. Prepare for hell, I reverted 30 vandalist edits on Finnish Civil War during the 24 hours. :-) -- +++$+++ ::Alright then, keep it in mind. By the way, did you already see that Bishop Henry will be featured on main page on 28th? Did you even suggest it? I mean wow, [[T-26 tank]] has been in queue for over a half year, and it took ages for [[Finnish Civil War]]. Good thing 28th is still Friday, so a lot of people will see it from their schools. Prepare for hell, I reverted 30 vandalist edits on Finnish Civil War during the 24 hours. :-) --[[User:Pudeo|Pudeo]][[User talk:Pudeo|⺮]] 20:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
12811 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12808 +++$+++ 12810 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.190888280E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I noticed. I did not suggest it, but I sure was pleased to notice it to be featured. Thanks for warning, I've loaded my guns for Friday :P -- +++$+++ :::Yeah, I noticed. I did not suggest it, but I sure was pleased to notice it to be featured. Thanks for warning, I've loaded my guns for Friday :P --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 03:18, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

274953 +++$+++ Ironholds +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274953 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-10 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.234336620E09 +++$+++ Hey there! I'm making a centralised \"library\" if you will of books that Wikipedians own; the idea is to give a single place of reference where users can go to find other users who might have texts on a subject they are writing about, rather than what we have at the moment (various users having indexesbooks they own scattered around in places). Would you have any problem with me including your texts given [[User:Sarah\/Books|here]] in the library?  +++$+++ Hey there! I'm making a centralised "library" if you will of books that Wikipedians own; the idea is to give a single place of reference where users can go to find other users who might have texts on a subject they are writing about, rather than what we have at the moment (various users having indexesbooks they own scattered around in places). Would you have any problem with me including your texts given [[User:Sarah/Books|here]] in the library? [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 23:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
274954 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274953 +++$+++ 274953 +++$+++ 2009-02-11 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.234364940E09 +++$+++ No, I have no objections to that so please feel free to do whatever you wish with it. I was actually compiling it to try to make sourcing easier but I never got back to finishing it so it's only a start. I'll try to get around to finishing it sometime. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ :No, I have no objections to that so please feel free to do whatever you wish with it. I was actually compiling it to try to make sourcing easier but I never got back to finishing it so it's only a start. I'll try to get around to finishing it sometime. :) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
274955 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274953 +++$+++ 274953 +++$+++ 2009-02-11 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.234365180E09 +++$+++ By the way, it might also be worth starting a list of people willing to help with sourcing who have access to journals and databases and which ones.  +++$+++ :By the way, it might also be worth starting a list of people willing to help with sourcing who have access to journals and databases and which ones. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
274956 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274953 +++$+++ 274953 +++$+++ 2009-02-25 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.235600520E09 +++$+++ I don't mind you asking me to help you access deleted articles or other adminy-related matters, but currently I'm very busy and I'm often not here for lengthy periods of time so it may well take me days or weeks or more to get back to you. So if it's something that you need help with quickly, you should probably check my contribs and consider asking someone else if it looks like I'm not around. I honestly don't mind you asking me for help, just as long as you understand that the answer might be slow coming. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I don't mind you asking me to help you access deleted articles or other adminy-related matters, but currently I'm very busy and I'm often not here for lengthy periods of time so it may well take me days or weeks or more to get back to you. So if it's something that you need help with quickly, you should probably check my contribs and consider asking someone else if it looks like I'm not around. I honestly don't mind you asking me for help, just as long as you understand that the answer might be slow coming. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

12812 +++$+++ Pudeo +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12812 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-29 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.191113580E09 +++$+++ So, I started the translation at [[:fi:Suomalais-novgorodilaissodat]]. It's quite word-from-word from your text. Looks OK? Still have to translate the last two chapters. Wonder if someone is going to claim [[WP:OR|original research]] soon. Too bad there isn't any much used term, ''suomalais-novgorodilaissodat'' gets 0 Google hits... -- +++$+++ So, I started the translation at [[:fi:Suomalais-novgorodilaissodat]]. It's quite word-from-word from your text. Looks OK? Still have to translate the last two chapters. Wonder if someone is going to claim [[WP:OR|original research]] soon. Too bad there isn't any much used term, ''suomalais-novgorodilaissodat'' gets 0 Google hits... --[[User:Pudeo|Pudeo]][[User talk:Pudeo|⺮]] 17:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
12813 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12812 +++$+++ 12812 +++$+++ 2007-09-30 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.191164700E09 +++$+++ Good work! I translated the remaining part and made some corrections. Hardly need for OR claims, all is well referenced. For some reason, the subject itself is generally overlooked and many people have never even heard of it. -- +++$+++ :Good work! I translated the remaining part and made some corrections. Hardly need for OR claims, all is well referenced. For some reason, the subject itself is generally overlooked and many people have never even heard of it. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 08:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

274957 +++$+++ Moorstone +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274957 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-10 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.236702840E09 +++$+++ I noticed my IP was blocked, well, anyway, I'm not here to disrupt (it is a block that allows me to edit anyway obviously!). I do edit from it mainly - but please do be aware that I'm not a vandal, my edits are only positive ones. Ta, -- +++$+++ I noticed my IP was blocked, well, anyway, I'm not here to disrupt (it is a block that allows me to edit anyway obviously!). I do edit from it mainly - but please do be aware that I'm not a vandal, my edits are only positive ones. Ta, --[[User:Moorstone|Moorstone]] ([[User talk:Moorstone|talk]]) 09:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
274958 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274957 +++$+++ 274957 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.236872160E09 +++$+++ Stop wasting my time, Sunholm. I'm not interested in your games and stories.  +++$+++ :Stop wasting my time, Sunholm. I'm not interested in your games and stories. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

12814 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12814 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-28 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.191012600E09 +++$+++ Congrats Drieakko for having your article on the front page!-- +++$+++ Congrats Drieakko for having your article on the front page!--[[User:Berig|Berig]] 13:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
12815 +++$+++  +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12814 +++$+++ 12814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thank you for noticing! After spending so much time with it, I was very pleased to see it selected for the front page :) --Drieakko 13:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :Thank you for noticing! After spending so much time with it, I was very pleased to see it selected for the front page :) --Drieakko 13:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

274959 +++$+++ S Marshall +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-21 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.237680660E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah!\u2014I'd like to translate Barbara Buchholz' article from the German wikipedia ([[:de:Barbara Buchholz|here]]), but I notice you deleted a previous article by that name in 2007.  Would you have any problem with me creating a fresh translation?\u2014 +++$+++ Hi Sarah!—I'd like to translate Barbara Buchholz' article from the German wikipedia ([[:de:Barbara Buchholz|here]]), but I notice you deleted a previous article by that name in 2007.  Would you have any problem with me creating a fresh translation?—[[User:S Marshall|<font face="Verdana" color="Black">'''S Marshall'''</font>]] [[User talk:S Marshall|<font color="black" size="0.5"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/S Marshall|<font color="Black" size="0.5"><sub>Cont</sub></font>]] 17:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
274960 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274959 +++$+++ 274959 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.237743900E09 +++$+++ Hello S Marshall ... I'm going to answer on behalf of Sarah who is only here on a limited basis of late and I am tending to watch her page and assist where possible; and also because I actually sought the speedy deletion of the original article which Sarah deleted back On April 11, 2007 (before I became an administrator). I have had a look at the reason I tagged it at the time and it was because an editor by the same name as the article title had created it and then asked for it to be blanked.  On that basis your recreation of the article as a fresh translation from the German 'pedia will be fine providing of course it meets the normal criteria for inclusion here. I hope that assists?-- +++$+++ *Hello S Marshall ... I'm going to answer on behalf of Sarah who is only here on a limited basis of late and I am tending to watch her page and assist where possible; and also because I actually sought the speedy deletion of the original article which Sarah deleted back On April 11, 2007 (before I became an administrator). I have had a look at the reason I tagged it at the time and it was because an editor by the same name as the article title had created it and then asked for it to be blanked.  On that basis your recreation of the article as a fresh translation from the German 'pedia will be fine providing of course it meets the normal criteria for inclusion here. I hope that assists?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 10:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
274961 +++$+++ S Marshall +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274959 +++$+++ 274960 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 11:34:00 +++$+++ 1.237746840E09 +++$+++ Hi Virtual Steve\u2014I've re-read the history of the German wikipedia article in the light of your comments and examined the sources more critically, and I'm now less sure this isn't a puff-page.  I think I'll translate something else instead.  Sorry to spam up your page, Sarah.\u2014 +++$+++ ::Hi Virtual Steve—I've re-read the history of the German wikipedia article in the light of your comments and examined the sources more critically, and I'm now less sure this isn't a puff-page.  I think I'll translate something else instead.  Sorry to spam up your page, Sarah.—[[User:S Marshall|<font face="Verdana" color="Black">'''S Marshall'''</font>]] [[User talk:S Marshall|<font color="black" size="0.5"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/S Marshall|<font color="Black" size="0.5"><sub>Cont</sub></font>]] 11:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

12816 +++$+++ Finlux +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12816 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-30 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.191205080E09 +++$+++ Hei! Saanko kokeilla tuota k\xe4ytt\xe4j\xe4n toimintah\xe4iri\xf6n varalle tarkoitettua shutoff-painiketta omalla k\xe4ytt\xe4j\xe4sivullani fi-wikiss\xe4? Hauska idea mielest\xe4ni. \u2013 +++$+++ Hei! Saanko kokeilla tuota käyttäjän toimintahäiriön varalle tarkoitettua shutoff-painiketta omalla käyttäjäsivullani fi-wikissä? Hauska idea mielestäni. –[[User:Finlux|Finlux]] 19:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
12817 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12816 +++$+++ 12816 +++$+++ 2007-09-30 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.191205200E09 +++$+++ I have lifted it from somewhere in Wikipedia :) so it's under GFDL. -- +++$+++ :I have lifted it from somewhere in Wikipedia :) so it's under GFDL. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 19:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
12818 +++$+++ Finlux +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12816 +++$+++ 12817 +++$+++ 2007-09-30 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.191205260E09 +++$+++ Ok. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Ok. Thanks. [[User:Finlux|Finlux]] 19:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

12819 +++$+++ Pudeo +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-04 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.191526320E09 +++$+++ Referring to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Finland&diff=161145518&oldid=161144583 your edit], are you sure? A lot of legal documents refer Finland as \"Republic of Finland\", see: [http:\/\/www.google.fi\/search?source=ig&hl=fi&q=site%3Afinlex.fi+%22Suomen+tasavalta%22&btnG=Google-haku&meta=]  Same with some parts of the [http:\/\/www.finlex.fi\/fi\/laki\/ajantasa\/1999\/19990731 constitution], although it does not define any \"official name\".-- +++$+++ Referring to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Finland&diff=161145518&oldid=161144583 your edit], are you sure? A lot of legal documents refer Finland as "Republic of Finland", see: [http://www.google.fi/search?source=ig&hl=fi&q=site%3Afinlex.fi+%22Suomen+tasavalta%22&btnG=Google-haku&meta=]  Same with some parts of the [http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1999/19990731 constitution], although it does not define any "official name".--[[User:Pudeo|Pudeo]][[User talk:Pudeo|⺮]] 12:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
12820 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12819 +++$+++ 12819 +++$+++ 2007-10-04 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.191528240E09 +++$+++ I was quite surprised with that finding myself, too. I went through the legislation and had to conclude that there was nothing about the \"Republic of Finland\" (Suomen tasavalta). No law seems to define that it is the official name of Finland. I'd guess that it comes from some governmental protocol department, but I really don't know. But it is not defined by the law. -- +++$+++ :I was quite surprised with that finding myself, too. I went through the legislation and had to conclude that there was nothing about the "Republic of Finland" (Suomen tasavalta). No law seems to define that it is the official name of Finland. I'd guess that it comes from some governmental protocol department, but I really don't know. But it is not defined by the law. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 13:04, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

12821 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12821 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-06 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.191712020E09 +++$+++ Hi Drieakko, I am still having the old dispute over the [[House of Muns\xf6]] with [[user:Pieter Kuiper]]. He wants to remove stuff, while I want to keep in things that I find interesting. Please, join the discussion and give your opinion.-- +++$+++ Hi Drieakko, I am still having the old dispute over the [[House of Munsö]] with [[user:Pieter Kuiper]]. He wants to remove stuff, while I want to keep in things that I find interesting. Please, join the discussion and give your opinion.--[[User:Berig|Berig]] 16:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
12822 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12821 +++$+++ 12821 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191714660E09 +++$+++ Oh well. Replied there. -- +++$+++ :Oh well. Replied there. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 16:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
12823 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12821 +++$+++ 12822 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.191714780E09 +++$+++ Thanks Drieakko :-).-- +++$+++ ::Thanks Drieakko :-).--[[User:Berig|Berig]] 16:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

274967 +++$+++ Jamiebijania +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274967 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-29 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.233251400E09 +++$+++ Hello,Sarah,can i have a copy of the deleted article\/page [[:User talk:Wroth of Dolly]]?Thank You in advance. +++$+++ Hello,Sarah,can i have a copy of the deleted article/page [[:User talk:Wroth of Dolly]]?Thank You in advance.[[User:Jamiebijania|Jamiebijania]] ([[User talk:Jamiebijania|talk]]) 09:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
274968 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274967 +++$+++ 274967 +++$+++ 2009-01-29 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.233251700E09 +++$+++ Why do you need a copy of this talk page?-- +++$+++ *Why do you need a copy of this talk page?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 09:55, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
274969 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274967 +++$+++ 274968 +++$+++ 2009-02-25 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.235600520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for keeping an eye on things for me Mr Steve. :) Much appreciated as always. Trust all is well with you.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for keeping an eye on things for me Mr Steve. :) Much appreciated as always. Trust all is well with you. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
274970 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274967 +++$+++ 274969 +++$+++ 2009-02-25 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.235627400E09 +++$+++ Always a pleasure. Nice to see you pop up on the radar Ms Sarah ;) - You sound very busy - hope it is all good.-- +++$+++ :::Always a pleasure. Nice to see you pop up on the radar Ms Sarah ;) - You sound very busy - hope it is all good.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 21:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

12824 +++$+++ STBotI +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12824 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-09 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.191979440E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.  +++$+++ If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. [[User:STBotI|STBotI]] 18:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
12825 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12824 +++$+++ 12824 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.191979860E09 +++$+++ Well that was fast. I hope I got the copyright properly tagged. -- +++$+++ :Well that was fast. I hope I got the copyright properly tagged. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 18:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
12826 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12824 +++$+++ 12824 +++$+++ 2007-10-14 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.192370100E09 +++$+++ My bad. Major uncommented edits by anonymous users easily get speedily judged. Good work there. -- +++$+++ :My bad. Major uncommented edits by anonymous users easily get speedily judged. Good work there. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] 06:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

274971 +++$+++ AWN2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-02 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.235995680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:AWN2|AWN2]] ([[User talk:AWN2|talk]]) 04:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
274972 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274971 +++$+++ 274971 +++$+++ 2009-03-02 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.236015660E09 +++$+++ Hey AWN2. I had a look but I couldn't find any deleted pages by those names. Are you sure they're correct?? I even had a look through your list of deleted revisions but all I could see for deleted userspace edits was 61 deleted revisions for [[User:AWN2\/workspace9]] and 128 deleted revisions at  +++$+++ :Hey AWN2. I had a look but I couldn't find any deleted pages by those names. Are you sure they're correct?? I even had a look through your list of deleted revisions but all I could see for deleted userspace edits was 61 deleted revisions for [[User:AWN2/workspace9]] and 128 deleted revisions at [[User:AWN2/workspace5]]. I'm quite happy to restore the pages for you if you can figure out where they are! Let me know if you want User:AWN2/workspace9 and User:AWN2/workspace5 restored. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
274973 +++$+++ AWN2 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274971 +++$+++ 274972 +++$+++ 2009-03-02 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.236065580E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah -- thanks for getting back to me :) Either the pages have mysteriously been renamed from \"sandboxX\" to \"workspaceX\", or it's been too long since I was on Wikipedia and I forgot... :o Sorry about that -- it all seems to be there... Thanks again anyway though -- I will now find other ways to humiliate myself :)  +++$+++ ::Hi Sarah -- thanks for getting back to me :) Either the pages have mysteriously been renamed from "sandboxX" to "workspaceX", or it's been too long since I was on Wikipedia and I forgot... :o Sorry about that -- it all seems to be there... Thanks again anyway though -- I will now find other ways to humiliate myself :) [[User:AWN2|AWN2]] ([[User talk:AWN2|talk]]) 23:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

537118 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-08 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.149796620E09 +++$+++ Hi, re [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Alexander_the_Great&diff=57522600&oldid=57504812 this], I disagree. Care to discuss? Please tell me why you removed it.  +++$+++ Hi, re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_the_Great&diff=57522600&oldid=57504812 this], I disagree. Care to discuss? Please tell me why you removed it. [[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#778">&nbsp;<span style="background:#889">N<span style="background:#99a">i<span style="background:#aab">k<span style="background:#bbc">o<span style="background:#ccd"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 12:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
537119 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537118 +++$+++ 537118 +++$+++ 2006-06-08 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.149796680E09 +++$+++ Probably because there is already a section dealing with the origin of the name: [[Alexander (disambiguation)#Origin]]. -- +++$+++ :Probably because there is already a section dealing with the origin of the name: [[Alexander (disambiguation)#Origin]]. --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 12:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
537120 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537118 +++$+++ 537119 +++$+++ 2006-06-08 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.149797220E09 +++$+++ Sure there is, but I find the etymology quite descriptive of the particular guy's character. It's just one little summarising phrase, which deserves being there. I am going to place a footnote that refers to the #Origin section. Other than that, I don't see any reason to remove it (apart from extreme sensitivity regarding the Greekness of the name, which I find unjustified).  +++$+++ ::Sure there is, but I find the etymology quite descriptive of the particular guy's character. It's just one little summarising phrase, which deserves being there. I am going to place a footnote that refers to the #Origin section. Other than that, I don't see any reason to remove it (apart from extreme sensitivity regarding the Greekness of the name, which I find unjustified). [[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#778">&nbsp;<span style="background:#889">N<span style="background:#99a">i<span style="background:#aab">k<span style="background:#bbc">o<span style="background:#ccd"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 13:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
537121 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537118 +++$+++ 537120 +++$+++ 2006-06-08 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.149826740E09 +++$+++ The problem is that if we do it for this Alexander, we won't be able to say no to all those who want to put the meaning in the hundreds (thousands) of Alexander in wikipedia, ancient and modern, and also the Philips and Johns.-- +++$+++ :::The problem is that if we do it for this Alexander, we won't be able to say no to all those who want to put the meaning in the hundreds (thousands) of Alexander in wikipedia, ancient and modern, and also the Philips and Johns.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
537122 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537118 +++$+++ 537121 +++$+++ 2006-06-08 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.149834300E09 +++$+++ Wouldn't object to that either, if it were ''descriptive of their personalities''. [[WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia]]!  +++$+++ ::::Wouldn't object to that either, if it were ''descriptive of their personalities''. [[WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia]]! [[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#778">&nbsp;<span style="background:#889">N<span style="background:#99a">i<span style="background:#aab">k<span style="background:#bbc">o<span style="background:#ccd"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 23:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

274975 +++$+++ AndrewEnns +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274975 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-23 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.243071720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:AndrewEnns|AndrewEnns]] ([[User talk:AndrewEnns|talk]]) 02:42, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
274976 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274975 +++$+++ 274975 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.243073280E09 +++$+++ Your account has never been blocked Andrew - what are you exactly referring to - and please come back here with a less attacking comment than the one above?-- +++$+++ *Your account has never been blocked Andrew - what are you exactly referring to - and please come back here with a less attacking comment than the one above?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 03:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
274977 +++$+++ AndrewEnns +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274975 +++$+++ 274975 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.243073640E09 +++$+++ I'm wondering why every time time I go on wikipedia when I'm not signed in does it say I'm blocked by Sarah for vandalism?  This is about the fifth time its happened.  +++$+++ :I'm wondering why every time time I go on wikipedia when I'm not signed in does it say I'm blocked by Sarah for vandalism?  This is about the fifth time its happened. [[User:AndrewEnns|AndrewEnns]] ([[User talk:AndrewEnns|talk]]) 03:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
274978 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274975 +++$+++ 274977 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.243073880E09 +++$+++ Andrew if you are able to edit now, that is on the same computer that you are on when you are not logged in, then you are not blocked.  Are you suggesting that you have been blocked 5 times separately or are you looking at an old message or are you using two different computers?-- +++$+++ ::Andrew if you are able to edit now, that is on the same computer that you are on when you are not logged in, then you are not blocked.  Are you suggesting that you have been blocked 5 times separately or are you looking at an old message or are you using two different computers?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 03:18, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

274979 +++$+++ AndrewEnns +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-23 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.243074060E09 +++$+++ Umm I'm using a different computer right now but this has happened both on the one I normally use & the one im using right now btw sorrry for being so rude.   +++$+++ Umm I'm using a different computer right now but this has happened both on the one I normally use & the one im using right now btw sorrry for being so rude.  [[User:AndrewEnns|AndrewEnns]] ([[User talk:AndrewEnns|talk]]) 03:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
274980 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274979 +++$+++ 274979 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.243074180E09 +++$+++ Okay - apology accepted on behalf of Sarah who is away on extended alternative business at the moment.  As I said if you can edit now you are not blocked so keep working (but of course watch our guidelines and policies as you do). Best wishes.-- +++$+++ *Okay - apology accepted on behalf of Sarah who is away on extended alternative business at the moment.  As I said if you can edit now you are not blocked so keep working (but of course watch our guidelines and policies as you do). Best wishes.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 03:23, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
274981 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274979 +++$+++ 274980 +++$+++ 2009-05-25 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.243248180E09 +++$+++ Thank you Steve. :) And thank you for the mail. It was a very nice surprise. A card will be coming your way very shortly. :)  +++$+++ ::Thank you Steve. :) And thank you for the mail. It was a very nice surprise. A card will be coming your way very shortly. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

12836 +++$+++ Nortonius +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12836 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-29 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.214767800E09 +++$+++ The trouble with your reversion of my recent edit of the [[Kvenland]] article is that the quotation previously given was extremely inaccurate, whereas my version, and numerous other tidies of sense made by me, were based directly on Alfred's Orosius - just, not a version available online. My edit was quite time consuming to produce, and I should have been grateful if you'd discussed it with me before reverting it. Hopefully I shall find the time soon (maybe today) to resurrect it, based on an online version, and incorporating your correct observation regarding Kvenland's non-appearance in Orosius' original. Thanks.  +++$+++ The trouble with your reversion of my recent edit of the [[Kvenland]] article is that the quotation previously given was extremely inaccurate, whereas my version, and numerous other tidies of sense made by me, were based directly on Alfred's Orosius - just, not a version available online. My edit was quite time consuming to produce, and I should have been grateful if you'd discussed it with me before reverting it. Hopefully I shall find the time soon (maybe today) to resurrect it, based on an online version, and incorporating your correct observation regarding Kvenland's non-appearance in Orosius' original. Thanks. [[User:Nortonius|Nortonius]] ([[User talk:Nortonius|talk]]) 12:30, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
12837 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12836 +++$+++ 12836 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.214768580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for comments. Are you saying that the online reference is NOT directly based on Alfred's Orosius? -- +++$+++ :Thanks for comments. Are you saying that the online reference is NOT directly based on Alfred's Orosius? --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] ([[User talk:Drieakko#top|talk]]) 12:43, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
12838 +++$+++ Nortonius +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12836 +++$+++ 12837 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.214769480E09 +++$+++ My main concern though is that a fairly extensive and careful attempt at an edit (i.e. mine) was reversed, without discussion.  I made it clear what I was doing in my edit summaries.  +++$+++ ::My main concern though is that a fairly extensive and careful attempt at an edit (i.e. mine) was reversed, without discussion.  I made it clear what I was doing in my edit summaries. [[User:Nortonius|Nortonius]] ([[User talk:Nortonius|talk]]) 12:58, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
12839 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12836 +++$+++ 12838 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.214772600E09 +++$+++ Please note that most of your edits were really ok and are there still. -- +++$+++ :::Please note that most of your edits were really ok and are there still. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] ([[User talk:Drieakko#top|talk]]) 13:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
12840 +++$+++ Nortonius +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12836 +++$+++ 12839 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.214776140E09 +++$+++ Doesn't that make a clear connection between the ''meres'' (as opposed to \"lakes\" - I think \"meres\" is better, as not only being the same word as used in the text, but also in preserving a need to question the meaning - see [http:\/\/home.comcast.net\/~modean52\/oeme_dictionaries.htm online Old English dictionary] for \"mere\"), and the attacks? It might help if you could direct me to a recent scholarly edition of the text - i.e., not just one academic's online version - but, I'm beginning to wonder if this is worth all the effort - though I do think I'll have another try at working over the quotation (I'm sorry but I can't ''bear'' a paraphrase masquerading as a quotation!), and the more \"interpretative\" sections of the article. I just think any remaining problems of interpretation (e.g. your understandable concerns about who was living where in the 9th century, and might have been attacked by the Kvens) are really matter for further writing, and shouldn't be skipped over by paraphrasing the quotation. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::::Doesn't that make a clear connection between the ''meres'' (as opposed to "lakes" - I think "meres" is better, as not only being the same word as used in the text, but also in preserving a need to question the meaning - see [http://home.comcast.net/~modean52/oeme_dictionaries.htm online Old English dictionary] for "mere"), and the attacks? It might help if you could direct me to a recent scholarly edition of the text - i.e., not just one academic's online version - but, I'm beginning to wonder if this is worth all the effort - though I do think I'll have another try at working over the quotation (I'm sorry but I can't ''bear'' a paraphrase masquerading as a quotation!), and the more "interpretative" sections of the article. I just think any remaining problems of interpretation (e.g. your understandable concerns about who was living where in the 9th century, and might have been attacked by the Kvens) are really matter for further writing, and shouldn't be skipped over by paraphrasing the quotation. Cheers. [[User:Nortonius|Nortonius]] ([[User talk:Nortonius|talk]]) 14:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
12841 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12836 +++$+++ 12840 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.214776980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for comments. I rephrased the part of article that discusses about the lakes. I hope I got your points covered there now. Translating Orosius seems to be a pain, see e.g. [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=g2-Lga0r62MC&pg=PA26&lpg=PA26&dq=meras+lakes&source=web&ots=Zm01HSTnDy&sig=ujB5VNL05KGURBHMMaZLubJ3ZyI&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=8&ct=result] which is quite different from the University of Victoria edition. -- +++$+++ :::::Thanks for comments. I rephrased the part of article that discusses about the lakes. I hope I got your points covered there now. Translating Orosius seems to be a pain, see e.g. [http://books.google.com/books?id=g2-Lga0r62MC&pg=PA26&lpg=PA26&dq=meras+lakes&source=web&ots=Zm01HSTnDy&sig=ujB5VNL05KGURBHMMaZLubJ3ZyI&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=8&ct=result] which is quite different from the University of Victoria edition. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] ([[User talk:Drieakko#top|talk]]) 15:03, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
12842 +++$+++ Nortonius +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12836 +++$+++ 12841 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.214793720E09 +++$+++ I think I'm simply going to have to be brave (or \"bold\") here, and re-work the translation and interpretation as before, relying on your forbearance - as I suggested before, it seems to me that the route previously taken in fact does the reader a disservice. In effect, it elides certain information, and so ultimately is a bit lazy. Better to work through it with more wikilinking or writing, than by paraphrasing quotations and offering the reader unexplained assumptions. Of course, if you or any other editor don't approve, you can always change it back again - and I think trying twice will be enough for me, if you see what I mean! I'll get around to it as soon as I can, anyway.  +++$+++ ::::::I think I'm simply going to have to be brave (or "bold") here, and re-work the translation and interpretation as before, relying on your forbearance - as I suggested before, it seems to me that the route previously taken in fact does the reader a disservice. In effect, it elides certain information, and so ultimately is a bit lazy. Better to work through it with more wikilinking or writing, than by paraphrasing quotations and offering the reader unexplained assumptions. Of course, if you or any other editor don't approve, you can always change it back again - and I think trying twice will be enough for me, if you see what I mean! I'll get around to it as soon as I can, anyway. [[User:Nortonius|Nortonius]] ([[User talk:Nortonius|talk]]) 19:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
12843 +++$+++ Nortonius +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12836 +++$+++ 12841 +++$+++ 2008-06-30 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.214815740E09 +++$+++ Ok, I've now saved another edit of [[Kvenland]], preserving much that I think you were concerned about, but also much that is clear to me. Note especially that there is ''no'' doubt in my mind over the interpretation now given for the relevant sections of Alfred's ''Orosius'' - e.g., OE \"geond\" cannot mean \"beyond\", \"moras\" ''could'' mean \"moors\" but probably means \"mountains\", and \"\xfeanon\" ''does'' mean \"thence\" (or almost synonymously \"whence\"), so Ohthere (or Alfred) ''does'' want us to understand that the Kvens attacked the Norwegians via the mysterious meres! Whether he was ''right'' or not is of course another matter, and not for us or anyone else to guess. There are a few other instances where you will see the translation I have given (from Thorpe) varies from the available online translations (e.g. \"meres\" and \"carry\"), but these are unequivocal. As I suggested earlier, doing things like replacing \"carry\" with \"portage\" is tendentious. I hope you'll be happy with it anyway! And, of course, I have strictly limited myself to editing the introduction and the section on Alfred's ''Orosius''. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::::::Ok, I've now saved another edit of [[Kvenland]], preserving much that I think you were concerned about, but also much that is clear to me. Note especially that there is ''no'' doubt in my mind over the interpretation now given for the relevant sections of Alfred's ''Orosius'' - e.g., OE "geond" cannot mean "beyond", "moras" ''could'' mean "moors" but probably means "mountains", and "þanon" ''does'' mean "thence" (or almost synonymously "whence"), so Ohthere (or Alfred) ''does'' want us to understand that the Kvens attacked the Norwegians via the mysterious meres! Whether he was ''right'' or not is of course another matter, and not for us or anyone else to guess. There are a few other instances where you will see the translation I have given (from Thorpe) varies from the available online translations (e.g. "meres" and "carry"), but these are unequivocal. As I suggested earlier, doing things like replacing "carry" with "portage" is tendentious. I hope you'll be happy with it anyway! And, of course, I have strictly limited myself to editing the introduction and the section on Alfred's ''Orosius''. Cheers. [[User:Nortonius|Nortonius]] ([[User talk:Nortonius|talk]]) 01:49, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

537125 +++$+++ Zleitzen +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537125 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-09 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.149901740E09 +++$+++ You have reverted ''three times'' on the [[Elections in Cuba]] page without explanation in the edit summary, and with no talk page interaction. This practice is not acceptable and frowned upon according to Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Please address this issue as soon as possible to avoid action via the Wikipedia dispute process.-- +++$+++ You have reverted ''three times'' on the [[Elections in Cuba]] page without explanation in the edit summary, and with no talk page interaction. This practice is not acceptable and frowned upon according to Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Please address this issue as soon as possible to avoid action via the Wikipedia dispute process.--[[User:Zleitzen|Zleitzen]] 18:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
537126 +++$+++ BruceHallman +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537125 +++$+++ 537125 +++$+++ 2006-06-09 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.149910920E09 +++$+++ Hello Aldux, I am trying to understand the reason for your reverts on the [[Elections in Cuba]] page. Your only explaination [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Elections_in_Cuba&diff=57714467&oldid=57713931 (*sigh*)] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Elections_in_Cuba&diff=57722351&oldid=57721155 (rv)] are not very helpful.  +++$+++ :Hello Aldux, I am trying to understand the reason for your reverts on the [[Elections in Cuba]] page. Your only explaination [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elections_in_Cuba&diff=57714467&oldid=57713931 (*sigh*)] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elections_in_Cuba&diff=57722351&oldid=57721155 (rv)] are not very helpful. [[User:BruceHallman|BruceHallman]] 20:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
537127 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537125 +++$+++ 537126 +++$+++ 2006-06-09 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.149912060E09 +++$+++ I hadn't been very impressed by your first edit today, especially your specific addition to Zleitzen, and when I saw you editing again, I thought you had restored it; that was rash on my part, I recognize it, and a violation of one of my most important laws, to always observe new edits with maximum attention. Too much wikiwork, I need a rest. As for not awnsering on the talk, I agreed with Ultramarine's points, so didn't see any need to add my point, as it was the same of his. Returning to your last edit, I have to insist that '''argues''' is more NPOV than '''identifies'''.-- +++$+++ ::I hadn't been very impressed by your first edit today, especially your specific addition to Zleitzen, and when I saw you editing again, I thought you had restored it; that was rash on my part, I recognize it, and a violation of one of my most important laws, to always observe new edits with maximum attention. Too much wikiwork, I need a rest. As for not awnsering on the talk, I agreed with Ultramarine's points, so didn't see any need to add my point, as it was the same of his. Returning to your last edit, I have to insist that '''argues''' is more NPOV than '''identifies'''.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

274982 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-27 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.243426740E09 +++$+++ To see you are still in working order! Long time no speak - trust WM Austrryiliea is goin ok -  +++$+++ To see you are still in working order! Long time no speak - trust WM Austrryiliea is goin ok - [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 05:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
274983 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274982 +++$+++ 274982 +++$+++ 2009-05-27 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.243427100E09 +++$+++ Hi Sats, yep, still in working order! Hope all is well with you and the fam. :) Yeah, WMA is going well with some interesting projects in the works! Thanks for popping by. :)  +++$+++ :Hi Sats, yep, still in working order! Hope all is well with you and the fam. :) Yeah, WMA is going well with some interesting projects in the works! Thanks for popping by. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
274984 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274982 +++$+++ 274982 +++$+++ 2009-05-27 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.243427220E09 +++$+++ Must remember to joinup ...  +++$+++ :Must remember to joinup ... [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 05:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

274985 +++$+++ JackofOz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274985 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-27 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.243475400E09 +++$+++ Excellent.  Thanks, Sarah.  --   +++$+++ Excellent.  Thanks, Sarah.  --  [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) 18:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
274986 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274985 +++$+++ 274985 +++$+++ 2009-05-28 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.243498980E09 +++$+++ My pleasure, Jack. Hope you find it useful. :)  +++$+++ :My pleasure, Jack. Hope you find it useful. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

274987 +++$+++ Cuddy Wifter +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-30 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.243680240E09 +++$+++ My thanks also Sarah, for the rollback. It will be a great help. Cheers.  +++$+++ My thanks also Sarah, for the rollback. It will be a great help. Cheers. [[User:Cuddy Wifter|Cuddy Wifter]] ([[User talk:Cuddy Wifter|talk]]) 03:44, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
274988 +++$+++ NorwegianBlue +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274987 +++$+++ 274987 +++$+++ 2009-05-30 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.243712460E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I happened to read your comment on Jack's talkpage. You wrote: ''I noticed you reverting vandalism on my watchlist...'' Am I misunderstanding what you wrote, or was there actually vandalism on your watchlist? I thought that someone's watchlist was visible only to themself, when logged in. -- +++$+++ :Hi Sarah, I happened to read your comment on Jack's talkpage. You wrote: ''I noticed you reverting vandalism on my watchlist...'' Am I misunderstanding what you wrote, or was there actually vandalism on your watchlist? I thought that someone's watchlist was visible only to themself, when logged in. --[[User:NorwegianBlue|NorwegianBlue]]<sup>[[User_talk:NorwegianBlue|&nbsp;<u>talk</u>]]</sup> 12:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
274989 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274987 +++$+++ 274988 +++$+++ 2009-05-30 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.243714260E09 +++$+++ NorwegianBlue, Sarah just means that of the various articles that she is watching (on her watchlist) she has noted that Jack has reverted vandalism to one or more of those articles - because Jack either has similar articles on his watchlist or because he happened to stumble across vandalism on those articles. I hope that explain the comment?-- +++$+++ ::NorwegianBlue, Sarah just means that of the various articles that she is watching (on her watchlist) she has noted that Jack has reverted vandalism to one or more of those articles - because Jack either has similar articles on his watchlist or because he happened to stumble across vandalism on those articles. I hope that explain the comment?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 13:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
274990 +++$+++ NorwegianBlue +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274987 +++$+++ 274989 +++$+++ 2009-05-30 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.243718040E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that explains it perfectly! -- +++$+++ :::Thanks, that explains it perfectly! --[[User:NorwegianBlue|NorwegianBlue]]<sup>[[User_talk:NorwegianBlue|&nbsp;<u>talk</u>]]</sup> 14:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
274991 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274987 +++$+++ 274989 +++$+++ 2009-05-30 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.243718520E09 +++$+++ (after ec)Yes, it is as Mr Steve says. I noticed Jack manually reverting a vandal on an article I have on my watchlist and I was surprised to see he didn't have rollback. Knowing that he is a very trustworthy editor, I went ahead and turned it on for him. The only way that I'm aware the watchlist could be vandalised is if an admin vandalised the MediaWiki space.  +++$+++ :::(after ec)Yes, it is as Mr Steve says. I noticed Jack manually reverting a vandal on an article I have on my watchlist and I was surprised to see he didn't have rollback. Knowing that he is a very trustworthy editor, I went ahead and turned it on for him. The only way that I'm aware the watchlist could be vandalised is if an admin vandalised the MediaWiki space. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

12844 +++$+++ Nortonius +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12844 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-30 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.214853780E09 +++$+++ Better still, thanks for your vote of confidence, in suggesting that I analyse Ohthere's account of his travels more closely! I'm flattered. This does desperately need doing. But, something which has held me back is an unfamiliarity with such details as relevant place name history and topography. Your comment at [[Talk:Ohthere of H\xe5logaland]] regarding Sami\/Finns is both very apt (as I now see), and suggests the kind of thing I mean. I could certainly attempt such an analysis, but would need support with these details. See what you think, maybe. Cheers again.  +++$+++ Better still, thanks for your vote of confidence, in suggesting that I analyse Ohthere's account of his travels more closely! I'm flattered. This does desperately need doing. But, something which has held me back is an unfamiliarity with such details as relevant place name history and topography. Your comment at [[Talk:Ohthere of Hålogaland]] regarding Sami/Finns is both very apt (as I now see), and suggests the kind of thing I mean. I could certainly attempt such an analysis, but would need support with these details. See what you think, maybe. Cheers again. [[User:Nortonius|Nortonius]] ([[User talk:Nortonius|talk]]) 12:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
12845 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12844 +++$+++ 12844 +++$+++ 2008-06-30 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.214856180E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. And I am ready to support you in the Ohthere analysis as soon as help is needed. Sometimes my contributions may feel like blunt objects ;) but the intention is always well-wishing. -- +++$+++ :You are welcome. And I am ready to support you in the Ohthere analysis as soon as help is needed. Sometimes my contributions may feel like blunt objects ;) but the intention is always well-wishing. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] ([[User talk:Drieakko#top|talk]]) 13:03, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
12846 +++$+++ Nortonius +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12844 +++$+++ 12845 +++$+++ 2008-06-30 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.214882880E09 +++$+++ Haha! Ok, I'll have a look at it when I can - I'm very happy dealing with Anglo-Saxon history and sources, but wouldn't want to venture too far into realms unknown without some sort of backup. I'll be in touch then. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::Haha! Ok, I'll have a look at it when I can - I'm very happy dealing with Anglo-Saxon history and sources, but wouldn't want to venture too far into realms unknown without some sort of backup. I'll be in touch then. Cheers. [[User:Nortonius|Nortonius]] ([[User talk:Nortonius|talk]]) 20:28, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

12848 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12848 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-02 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.230944640E09 +++$+++ Hi Drieakko! It's nice to see you editing again!-- +++$+++ Hi Drieakko! It's nice to see you editing again!--[[User:Berig|Berig]] ([[User talk:Berig|talk]]) 17:04, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
12849 +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ Drieakko +++$+++ 12848 +++$+++ 12848 +++$+++ 2009-10-31 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.256975160E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Having only sporadic time nowadays for Wikipedia, but maybe returning with better time later. -- +++$+++ :Thanks! Having only sporadic time nowadays for Wikipedia, but maybe returning with better time later. --[[User:Drieakko|Drieakko]] ([[User talk:Drieakko#top|talk]]) 00:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

274993 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-23 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.245751800E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 03:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
274994 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274993 +++$+++ 274993 +++$+++ 2009-06-23 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.245753120E09 +++$+++ Thank you, sir. :)  +++$+++ :Thank you, sir. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
274995 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274993 +++$+++ 274994 +++$+++ 2009-06-23 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.245768420E09 +++$+++ Glad I got that right and happy you were pleasantly surprised. Canberra in August? - not sure as yet but if I am going to be around I will register with you. Best wishes to you again.-- +++$+++ ::Glad I got that right and happy you were pleasantly surprised. Canberra in August? - not sure as yet but if I am going to be around I will register with you. Best wishes to you again.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 07:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

209581 +++$+++  +++$+++ Yellowdesk +++$+++ 209581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-10 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.223626200E09 +++$+++ Well, to be honest, I was looking at names through recent changes. I'm trying to get as many users as possible, so I asked. Will you join?--[[User:LAAFan|<font color=\"orange\" face=\"Times New Roman\">LAA<\/font>]][[User talk:LAAFan|<font color=\"black\" face=\"Times New Roman\">Fan<\/font>]]''<sup> +++$+++ Well, to be honest, I was looking at names through recent changes. I'm trying to get as many users as possible, so I asked. Will you join?--[[User:LAAFan|<font color="orange" face="Times New Roman">LAA</font>]][[User talk:LAAFan|<font color="black" face="Times New Roman">Fan</font>]]''<sup>[[User:LAAFan/Guestbook|sign]]</sup> <sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/LAAFan 2|review]]''</sub> 01:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
209582 +++$+++ Yellowdesk +++$+++ Yellowdesk +++$+++ 209581 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-10 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.223627160E09 +++$+++ and their related articles. <br> --  +++$+++ ::and their related articles. <br> -- [[User:Yellowdesk|Yellowdesk]] ([[User talk:Yellowdesk#top|talk]]) 01:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
209583 +++$+++  +++$+++ Yellowdesk +++$+++ 209581 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-10 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.223627040E09 +++$+++ No worries. See you around!--[[User:LAAFan|<font color=\"orange\" face=\"Times New Roman\">LAA<\/font>]][[User talk:LAAFan|<font color=\"black\" face=\"Times New Roman\">Fan<\/font>]]''<sup> +++$+++ ::No worries. See you around!--[[User:LAAFan|<font color="orange" face="Times New Roman">LAA</font>]][[User talk:LAAFan|<font color="black" face="Times New Roman">Fan</font>]]''<sup>[[User:LAAFan/Guestbook|sign]]</sup> <sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/LAAFan 2|review]]''</sub> 01:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

537139 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537139 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-16 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.150516620E09 +++$+++ Hi, I have said quite a lot on the Pomaks at [[Minority groups in Greece]] (in the Slav section). I don't know how this will affect your work on the [[Pomaks]] article, in the area of duplicating information. -- +++$+++ Hi, I have said quite a lot on the Pomaks at [[Minority groups in Greece]] (in the Slav section). I don't know how this will affect your work on the [[Pomaks]] article, in the area of duplicating information. --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 20:57, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
537140 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537139 +++$+++ 537139 +++$+++ 2006-06-16 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.150519560E09 +++$+++ Nice work. I don't see great problems: I've found tons of material on the Greek Pomaks, so it'll be considerable bigger. As for duplicates, we will eventually discuss it at the present conditions, if to shorten some pieces or keep it at it is.-- +++$+++ :Nice work. I don't see great problems: I've found tons of material on the Greek Pomaks, so it'll be considerable bigger. As for duplicates, we will eventually discuss it at the present conditions, if to shorten some pieces or keep it at it is.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

274997 +++$+++ Marx01 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-29 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.246262100E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm Marx01. I was just curious what the requirements for rollback rights were? I found you at the 'Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to grant rollback requests'  page and was curious how you acquire them. I've already read the rollback feature page, but I'm still not sure. I always revert vandalized pages (usually on the recent changes page), but the task is very tedious and it would be an amazing help. Sorry if you were the wrong person to come to; I picked a random admin. If you feel I'm not ready please tell me :D. Have an awesome day,  +++$+++ Hi, I'm Marx01. I was just curious what the requirements for rollback rights were? I found you at the 'Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to grant rollback requests'  page and was curious how you acquire them. I've already read the rollback feature page, but I'm still not sure. I always revert vandalized pages (usually on the recent changes page), but the task is very tedious and it would be an amazing help. Sorry if you were the wrong person to come to; I picked a random admin. If you feel I'm not ready please tell me :D. Have an awesome day, [[User:Marx01|Marx01]] ([[User talk:Marx01|talk]]) 00:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
274998 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274997 +++$+++ 274997 +++$+++ 2009-06-29 09:24:00 +++$+++ 1.246292640E09 +++$+++ I will give you a chance to prove yourself with the rollback tool but please do be careful to use it in accordance with policy, so if you are not sure about something or you have any queries or concerns please don't hesitate to come straight back and ask me.  +++$+++ :I will give you a chance to prove yourself with the rollback tool but please do be careful to use it in accordance with policy, so if you are not sure about something or you have any queries or concerns please don't hesitate to come straight back and ask me. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

274999 +++$+++ Trevvvy +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274999 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-01 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.246513320E09 +++$+++ Suspect [[User:HexaChord]] has returned as [[User:217.228.64.74]], per [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/IncidentArchive545#User:HexaChord_and_his.2Fher_sockpuppets].  +++$+++ Suspect [[User:HexaChord]] has returned as [[User:217.228.64.74]], per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive545#User:HexaChord_and_his.2Fher_sockpuppets]. [[User:Trevvvy|Trevvvy]] ([[User talk:Trevvvy|talk]]) 22:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
275000 +++$+++ Aervanath +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274999 +++$+++ 274999 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.246528140E09 +++$+++ You can ignore this; I have blocked [[User:Trevvvy]] as a sockpuppet of [[User:Leanne]].-- +++$+++ :You can ignore this; I have blocked [[User:Trevvvy]] as a sockpuppet of [[User:Leanne]].--[[User:Aervanath|Aervanath]] ([[User talk:Aervanath|talk]]) 02:49, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

275001 +++$+++ Raintheone +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-02 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.246562220E09 +++$+++ I'm pulling you up on this. There is nothing I like about fansite type articles. That's why I don't edit them like they are. The edits you have made to many of these character articles are lazy. I hear you obviously spent a lot of your time looking at them, but infact it's just ridding of everything apart from the info box, and a small sentence. You could help to improve these and find whats been said and do some original research. Atleast on one. I'm a member of the wikiproject for [[Coronation Street]]. We constantly edit them everytime something comes up, or we come across a book, or a TV show imitates a character, or something comes on the news. Anything that happens outside the show that not minor goes in on them. There for I don't see why you say you'd rather delete this particular character page, she did cause a bit of a stir in Australia, the UK media picked up on it to and kind of critised things over there. So a bit of a reaction on both sides, then you had different conservative groups moaning, then countered by LGBT groups. The actress had a lot to say too. +++$+++ I'm pulling you up on this. There is nothing I like about fansite type articles. That's why I don't edit them like they are. The edits you have made to many of these character articles are lazy. I hear you obviously spent a lot of your time looking at them, but infact it's just ridding of everything apart from the info box, and a small sentence. You could help to improve these and find whats been said and do some original research. Atleast on one. I'm a member of the wikiproject for [[Coronation Street]]. We constantly edit them everytime something comes up, or we come across a book, or a TV show imitates a character, or something comes on the news. Anything that happens outside the show that not minor goes in on them. There for I don't see why you say you'd rather delete this particular character page, she did cause a bit of a stir in Australia, the UK media picked up on it to and kind of critised things over there. So a bit of a reaction on both sides, then you had different conservative groups moaning, then countered by LGBT groups. The actress had a lot to say too.[[User:Raintheone|Raintheone]] ([[User talk:Raintheone|talk]]) 12:17, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
275002 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275001 +++$+++ 275001 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.246568700E09 +++$+++ Your \"I'm pulling you up on this\" is offensive - I'm not some naughty little school kid who hasn't done their home work; I'm an adult and if you can't speak to me as one then please don't bother talking to me at all. Your allegations are rubbish. It's not my responsibility as an administrator to spent my life trying to find sources for information that ''I don't believe should be in this website''. Ultimately the storyline and background information is unverified and unverifiable and therefore ''does not belong on Wikipeda.'' Please go and read [[WP:V|the verifiabilty policy]]. There may have been a lot of \"stir\" caused in Australia but that doesn't exclude the requirement for information to be sourced to reliable sources, and it's the responsibility of people adding information to provide the sources, not the poor administrator who tries to clean up after them. Yes, I do think the Charlie Buckton article should be deleted because I think it would be better to clear the decks and start again, but I don't actually care either way if we end up with a new article there or not, as long as it complies with this website's policies, because that is my job and my responsibility. If you want to write a replacement then feel free, just make sure that it complies with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and you won't even hear from me about it.  +++$+++ :Your "I'm pulling you up on this" is offensive - I'm not some naughty little school kid who hasn't done their home work; I'm an adult and if you can't speak to me as one then please don't bother talking to me at all. Your allegations are rubbish. It's not my responsibility as an administrator to spent my life trying to find sources for information that ''I don't believe should be in this website''. Ultimately the storyline and background information is unverified and unverifiable and therefore ''does not belong on Wikipeda.'' Please go and read [[WP:V|the verifiabilty policy]]. There may have been a lot of "stir" caused in Australia but that doesn't exclude the requirement for information to be sourced to reliable sources, and it's the responsibility of people adding information to provide the sources, not the poor administrator who tries to clean up after them. Yes, I do think the Charlie Buckton article should be deleted because I think it would be better to clear the decks and start again, but I don't actually care either way if we end up with a new article there or not, as long as it complies with this website's policies, because that is my job and my responsibility. If you want to write a replacement then feel free, just make sure that it complies with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and you won't even hear from me about it. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:05, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
275003 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275001 +++$+++ 275001 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.246570740E09 +++$+++ Also, if you're a member of a Coronation Street wikiproject, it follows that you have a special interest in that subject area and explains why you'd want to spend lots of time researching and rewriting the articles. This is not a comparable situation. I don't have a special interest in Home and Away or its characters. I happened upon these articles by accident and not as a member of some Home and Away project or even a tv project and it is unfair and unrealistic to demand that an administrator (or editor) cleaning up non-compliant material across a significant number of articles (that had been tagged for sources and rewriting in some cases for ''years'', I might add) then turn around and also spend a large amount of time researching and rewriting beyond providing a basic starting point. Just rereading that article again, I absolutely stand by my edits to Charlie Buckton - that entire \"Storyline\" discussion does not belong on Wikipedia. I would also note that the previous version [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Charlie_Buckton&oldid=296976347] ''didn't even mention'' the media reaction to the storyline that you refer to - there's actually more about that in the stub I rewrote than was in the previous version! And I did look up sources - where do you think the ''Courier Mail'' article currently cited in the article actually came from?  +++$+++ :Also, if you're a member of a Coronation Street wikiproject, it follows that you have a special interest in that subject area and explains why you'd want to spend lots of time researching and rewriting the articles. This is not a comparable situation. I don't have a special interest in Home and Away or its characters. I happened upon these articles by accident and not as a member of some Home and Away project or even a tv project and it is unfair and unrealistic to demand that an administrator (or editor) cleaning up non-compliant material across a significant number of articles (that had been tagged for sources and rewriting in some cases for ''years'', I might add) then turn around and also spend a large amount of time researching and rewriting beyond providing a basic starting point. Just rereading that article again, I absolutely stand by my edits to Charlie Buckton - that entire "Storyline" discussion does not belong on Wikipedia. I would also note that the previous version [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charlie_Buckton&oldid=296976347] ''didn't even mention'' the media reaction to the storyline that you refer to - there's actually more about that in the stub I rewrote than was in the previous version! And I did look up sources - where do you think the ''Courier Mail'' article currently cited in the article actually came from? [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
275004 +++$+++ Raintheone +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275001 +++$+++ 275003 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.246572120E09 +++$+++ I didn't mean to sound patronising. That was a mindless comment I made, I didn't mean it to sound I have authority over you, just I didn't want it to go down the pan without a discussion into other outcomes. Do you perhaps spare some of your time creating\/advising\/helping me to create a wikiproject for the show and all of the articles. The fans that edit need a place to chat and discuss making them better, and if they are big fans they will may join and contribute. I know you may not think it is a good idea as it seems I'm trying to save the pages, but I have no care for minor characters, that have had no impact. But where there are characters their is scope to write alot about. I have no idea how to create such a thing as I don't have the know how in that area, I've tried looking at how to do it. Confusing. +++$+++ ::I didn't mean to sound patronising. That was a mindless comment I made, I didn't mean it to sound I have authority over you, just I didn't want it to go down the pan without a discussion into other outcomes. Do you perhaps spare some of your time creating/advising/helping me to create a wikiproject for the show and all of the articles. The fans that edit need a place to chat and discuss making them better, and if they are big fans they will may join and contribute. I know you may not think it is a good idea as it seems I'm trying to save the pages, but I have no care for minor characters, that have had no impact. But where there are characters their is scope to write alot about. I have no idea how to create such a thing as I don't have the know how in that area, I've tried looking at how to do it. Confusing.[[User:Raintheone|Raintheone]] ([[User talk:Raintheone|talk]]) 15:02, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
275005 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275001 +++$+++ 275004 +++$+++ 2009-07-02 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.246575420E09 +++$+++ I don't mind you trying to save articles. I don't even mind if there ends up being articles about notable characters. They just need to be maintainable and generally comply with Wikipedia's content policies. I'm happy to look at any draft articles and help out wherever I can, but I've never even created a Wikiproject so I'm not a good person to ask about that. You probably need to start by finding a good group of established editors interested in writing Home and Away articles but I can't even think of anyone to recommend off the top of my head...perhaps as the current AFD progresses more people interested in Home and Away will come forward and you could then contact them and see if they'd be interested in forming a wikiproject to work on Home and Away articles. It might be effective to include Neighbours as well as there seems to be a lot of crossover between the two subject areas and Neighbours character articles are in a bit of a mess as well.  +++$+++ :::I don't mind you trying to save articles. I don't even mind if there ends up being articles about notable characters. They just need to be maintainable and generally comply with Wikipedia's content policies. I'm happy to look at any draft articles and help out wherever I can, but I've never even created a Wikiproject so I'm not a good person to ask about that. You probably need to start by finding a good group of established editors interested in writing Home and Away articles but I can't even think of anyone to recommend off the top of my head...perhaps as the current AFD progresses more people interested in Home and Away will come forward and you could then contact them and see if they'd be interested in forming a wikiproject to work on Home and Away articles. It might be effective to include Neighbours as well as there seems to be a lot of crossover between the two subject areas and Neighbours character articles are in a bit of a mess as well. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 15:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

12861 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ David A +++$+++ 12861 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-07 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.294441140E09 +++$+++ David! Dude! Your succinct and apropos clarifications at Chaos War were right on! I can appreciate how difficult it must have been, but that is exactly the kind of careful, big-picture details these articles need. I can't tell you how impressed I am by what I know took real effort on your part. That was terrific. You really came through &mdash; third-party cite and everything. With regards, -- +++$+++ David! Dude! Your succinct and apropos clarifications at Chaos War were right on! I can appreciate how difficult it must have been, but that is exactly the kind of careful, big-picture details these articles need. I can't tell you how impressed I am by what I know took real effort on your part. That was terrific. You really came through &mdash; third-party cite and everything. With regards, --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 14:59, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
12862 +++$+++ David A +++$+++ David A +++$+++ 12861 +++$+++ 12861 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.294452480E09 +++$+++ Thank you. As always it is much easier when I have a firm structure to follow already in place. :)  +++$+++ :Thank you. As always it is much easier when I have a firm structure to follow already in place. :) [[User:David A|Dave]] ([[User talk:David A#top|talk]]) 18:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
12863 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ David A +++$+++ 12861 +++$+++ 12862 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.296363300E09 +++$+++ Never a bother. I'm just not sure how much I can help. Is there one particular section or one particular impasse where a third eye or a little mediation might be helpful? I know you and MobbOne are trying hard and have good intentions. -- +++$+++ ::Never a bother. I'm just not sure how much I can help. Is there one particular section or one particular impasse where a third eye or a little mediation might be helpful? I know you and MobbOne are trying hard and have good intentions. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 20:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
12864 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ David A +++$+++ 12861 +++$+++ 12862 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.296384600E09 +++$+++ Yes, that would help.  I know we have worked before on smaller parts of the article to come to some sort of consensus.  +++$+++ ::Yes, that would help.  I know we have worked before on smaller parts of the article to come to some sort of consensus. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 02:50, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
12865 +++$+++ David A +++$+++ David A +++$+++ 12861 +++$+++ 12862 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.296407280E09 +++$+++ Also, Mobb changed back the neutral image-description that I thought we agreed on together with Tenebrae, to his own leading version, even though the image is directly linked and possible to read for themselves by any visitors. This sort of thing is getting tiresome.  +++$+++ ::Also, Mobb changed back the neutral image-description that I thought we agreed on together with Tenebrae, to his own leading version, even though the image is directly linked and possible to read for themselves by any visitors. This sort of thing is getting tiresome. [[User:David A|Dave]] ([[User talk:David A#top|talk]]) 09:08, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
12866 +++$+++ Aidoflight +++$+++ David A +++$+++ 12861 +++$+++ 12865 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.298103180E09 +++$+++ Dave, I'm sure that no one's trying to think of you as some kind of \"antichrist\", but, please, we each have different viewpoints and perspectives, and as we are all part of the greater Wikipedia community, we should try to respect one another as best we can. It is true, you and they may not see eye to eye, yet surely some kind of compromise can be worked out? Don't worry, I'm not at all interested in your Galactus article, but you really should try to see things from their point of view as well...  +++$+++ :::Dave, I'm sure that no one's trying to think of you as some kind of "antichrist", but, please, we each have different viewpoints and perspectives, and as we are all part of the greater Wikipedia community, we should try to respect one another as best we can. It is true, you and they may not see eye to eye, yet surely some kind of compromise can be worked out? Don't worry, I'm not at all interested in your Galactus article, but you really should try to see things from their point of view as well... [[User:Aidoflight|Aidoflight]] ([[User talk:Aidoflight|talk]]) 00:13, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
12867 +++$+++ David A +++$+++ David A +++$+++ 12861 +++$+++ 12865 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.298590260E09 +++$+++ Look, their missing-the-point accusations have been going on for a few years, but if you want to know why exactly people with a certain type of viewpoint seem to obsess about me, or even view me in a similar manner to how a Muslim fundamentalist would perceive swearing in church, then read the entirety of my story.  +++$+++ :::Look, their missing-the-point accusations have been going on for a few years, but if you want to know why exactly people with a certain type of viewpoint seem to obsess about me, or even view me in a similar manner to how a Muslim fundamentalist would perceive swearing in church, then read the entirety of my story. [[User:David A|Dave]] ([[User talk:David A#top|talk]]) 15:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

89525 +++$+++ Milkunderwood +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89525 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-24 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.306250940E09 +++$+++ I very much appreciate any help you can give.  +++$+++ I very much appreciate any help you can give. [[User:Milkunderwood|Milkunderwood]] ([[User talk:Milkunderwood|talk]]) 08:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
89526 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89525 +++$+++ 89525 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.306279200E09 +++$+++ \"Onset\" is used in acoustical situations, but not, I think, by musicians. I have heard \"mode of attack\", just plain \"attack\", and (in the case of the piano) \"touch\". I don't know how well-established these terms may be\u2014they are just the words I have heard used. You might find [[Attack_(music)#ADSR_envelope]] helpful, though this is specific to synthesizers.\u2014 +++$+++ :"Onset" is used in acoustical situations, but not, I think, by musicians. I have heard "mode of attack", just plain "attack", and (in the case of the piano) "touch". I don't know how well-established these terms may be—they are just the words I have heard used. You might find [[Attack_(music)#ADSR_envelope]] helpful, though this is specific to synthesizers.—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 16:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
89527 +++$+++ Milkunderwood +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89525 +++$+++ 89526 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.306285800E09 +++$+++ Very helpful - thank you.  +++$+++ ::Very helpful - thank you. [[User:Milkunderwood|Milkunderwood]] ([[User talk:Milkunderwood|talk]]) 18:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

537152 +++$+++ Tregonsee +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-24 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.151210760E09 +++$+++ Hi, Aldux. Nice to meet you. Thanks for reverting \"BC\" back to \"BCE\" in the [[Posidonius]] article. Wikipedia is a world-wide project so when I made my contributions to the article I wanted to use \"BCE\" as it's a more universal designation. Probably the anonymous edit was well-intentioned, quite possible that the anon had never heard of \"BCE\". -- +++$+++ Hi, Aldux. Nice to meet you. Thanks for reverting "BC" back to "BCE" in the [[Posidonius]] article. Wikipedia is a world-wide project so when I made my contributions to the article I wanted to use "BCE" as it's a more universal designation. Probably the anonymous edit was well-intentioned, quite possible that the anon had never heard of "BCE". --[[User:Tregonsee|Tregonsee]] 21:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
537153 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537152 +++$+++ 537152 +++$+++ 2006-06-26 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.151387580E09 +++$+++ Actually I'm quite neutral on the issue, truely; I only helped maintain the status quo, against arbitrary changes.-- +++$+++ :Actually I'm quite neutral on the issue, truely; I only helped maintain the status quo, against arbitrary changes.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 22:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

275009 +++$+++ JWSchmidt +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275009 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-05 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.246791000E09 +++$+++ Do you know if there is a similar website where it is possible to obtain copies of transcripts for trials of the [[Supreme Court of New South Wales]]?  -- +++$+++ Do you know if there is a similar website where it is possible to obtain copies of transcripts for trials of the [[Supreme Court of New South Wales]]?  --[[User:JWSchmidt|JWSchmidt]] ([[User talk:JWSchmidt|talk]]) 03:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
275010 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275009 +++$+++ 275009 +++$+++ 2009-07-05 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.246791300E09 +++$+++ Have you tried [http:\/\/www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au\/ http:\/\/www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au\/]? I've not used the site before but it may(or not) have the Supreme Court of New South Wales transcripts.  +++$+++ :Have you tried [http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/ http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/]? I've not used the site before but it may(or not) have the Supreme Court of New South Wales transcripts. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 03:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
275011 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275009 +++$+++ 275009 +++$+++ 2009-07-05 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.246791540E09 +++$+++ (after ec)Have you tried the other Autlii databases - [http:\/\/www.austlii.edu.au\/databases.html#nsw www.austlii.edu.au\/databases.html#nsw] for NSW? Austlii is generally considered the premier Australian legal resources site. Is there something specific you're looking for? I have alumni access to the databases at a university in Queensland and would be happy to poke around in their databases for you.  +++$+++ :(after ec)Have you tried the other Autlii databases - [http://www.austlii.edu.au/databases.html#nsw www.austlii.edu.au/databases.html#nsw] for NSW? Austlii is generally considered the premier Australian legal resources site. Is there something specific you're looking for? I have alumni access to the databases at a university in Queensland and would be happy to poke around in their databases for you. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

537156 +++$+++ BanyanTree +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537156 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-26 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.151308260E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux, I've given some thought to our last exchange on my talk and wonder if you would accept a nomination for adminship. I glanced over your recent edits and think you would find the privileges useful. A word of caution: I've never seen a nominator who had voluntary desysopped previously. There's an outside chance this may affect some voters, so you may want to seek another nominator. If you're still interested, please glance over [[Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship|the guide]] and get back to me. There's no rush, so feel free to give it some thought. If you say yes, I'll dig into your edits some more and come up with a nomination in a couple days. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Aldux, I've given some thought to our last exchange on my talk and wonder if you would accept a nomination for adminship. I glanced over your recent edits and think you would find the privileges useful. A word of caution: I've never seen a nominator who had voluntary desysopped previously. There's an outside chance this may affect some voters, so you may want to seek another nominator. If you're still interested, please glance over [[Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship|the guide]] and get back to me. There's no rush, so feel free to give it some thought. If you say yes, I'll dig into your edits some more and come up with a nomination in a couple days. Cheers, [[User talk:BanyanTree|BT]] 00:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
537157 +++$+++ BanyanTree +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537156 +++$+++ 537156 +++$+++ 2006-07-04 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.152012840E09 +++$+++ Once Ezeu had added his co-nom, please update the end time and transclude the page into [[WP:RFA]] per [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/nominate#What to do if you are nominated by someone else:|this guidance]]. Remember that the only time limit starts after you accept, so take as much time as you want to answer the questions. Good luck! -  +++$+++ :Once Ezeu had added his co-nom, please update the end time and transclude the page into [[WP:RFA]] per [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate#What to do if you are nominated by someone else:|this guidance]]. Remember that the only time limit starts after you accept, so take as much time as you want to answer the questions. Good luck! - [[User talk:BanyanTree|BT]] 04:34, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

275014 +++$+++ AdjustShift +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-07 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.246964220E09 +++$+++ You were involved with NYScholar before, and you provided solid reason why NYScholar should be banned. After NYScholar was banned, Abd has argued that since you are an involved editor, I shouldn't have counted your arguments while closing the discussion! Please read his arguments at [[Wikipedia talk:Banning policy]]. You should also analyze [[User:Abd\/Sandbox]]. Would you like to give your input? You can provide your input at [[Wikipedia talk:Banning policy]].  +++$+++ You were involved with NYScholar before, and you provided solid reason why NYScholar should be banned. After NYScholar was banned, Abd has argued that since you are an involved editor, I shouldn't have counted your arguments while closing the discussion! Please read his arguments at [[Wikipedia talk:Banning policy]]. You should also analyze [[User:Abd/Sandbox]]. Would you like to give your input? You can provide your input at [[Wikipedia talk:Banning policy]]. [[User:AdjustShift|AdjustShift]] ([[User talk:AdjustShift|talk]]) 03:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
275015 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275014 +++$+++ 275014 +++$+++ 2009-07-07 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.246965360E09 +++$+++ Sure, I'll pop over there when I have a spare minute and take a look. I'm really busy right now and about to go out for a couple of hours, so it won't be until later. I haven't read the comments yet, so just a general comment in response to your post here, I wasn't involved in the dispute. I was involved in previous discussions on ANI but I only became involved as a (then) uninvolved administrator investigating complaints to ANI. Prior to that I have never edited the same articles as NYScholar and had no involvement with him other than contacting him regarding an OTRS complaint about some incorrect information he posted stating incorrectly that a living person was dead. The family saw this on Google and were very distressed and contacted the Wikimedia Foundation to complain and request removal of the information and wanted to be put in contact with NYScholar, and I handled the complaint and contacted NYScholar about it. Prior to that I had had no involvement with him at all, so all my involvement has come about as an administrator and an OTRS agent. I wasn't involved in any content disputes or anything like that. At the time of the previous ban proposal and decision to allow another go at mentoring with Shell, the discussion was basically deferred pending the mentorship, so I don't think it is inappropriate for users involved in the previous discussion to have input when the mentor returns and reports the mentorship has failed. I really can't see how there can be seen to be anything untoward with the discussion or with your closure. It is a very sad circumstance and I did not want to see NYScholar banned; I would have much rather seen him take on board the feedback and improve his editing practices but sadly that did not happen and I did not see there was any realistic alternative. Likewise I don't see how you could have closed the discussion any other way. NYScholar is welcome to appeal to the arbitration committee if he wishes to and if Abd thinks the ban invalid, perhaps he could raise it with the arbitrators and see what they think. Anyway, as I said I haven't seen the discussion yet but I will take a look at it when I have some time. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Sure, I'll pop over there when I have a spare minute and take a look. I'm really busy right now and about to go out for a couple of hours, so it won't be until later. I haven't read the comments yet, so just a general comment in response to your post here, I wasn't involved in the dispute. I was involved in previous discussions on ANI but I only became involved as a (then) uninvolved administrator investigating complaints to ANI. Prior to that I have never edited the same articles as NYScholar and had no involvement with him other than contacting him regarding an OTRS complaint about some incorrect information he posted stating incorrectly that a living person was dead. The family saw this on Google and were very distressed and contacted the Wikimedia Foundation to complain and request removal of the information and wanted to be put in contact with NYScholar, and I handled the complaint and contacted NYScholar about it. Prior to that I had had no involvement with him at all, so all my involvement has come about as an administrator and an OTRS agent. I wasn't involved in any content disputes or anything like that. At the time of the previous ban proposal and decision to allow another go at mentoring with Shell, the discussion was basically deferred pending the mentorship, so I don't think it is inappropriate for users involved in the previous discussion to have input when the mentor returns and reports the mentorship has failed. I really can't see how there can be seen to be anything untoward with the discussion or with your closure. It is a very sad circumstance and I did not want to see NYScholar banned; I would have much rather seen him take on board the feedback and improve his editing practices but sadly that did not happen and I did not see there was any realistic alternative. Likewise I don't see how you could have closed the discussion any other way. NYScholar is welcome to appeal to the arbitration committee if he wishes to and if Abd thinks the ban invalid, perhaps he could raise it with the arbitrators and see what they think. Anyway, as I said I haven't seen the discussion yet but I will take a look at it when I have some time. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

526433 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526433 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-20 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.166606400E09 +++$+++ Thanks, &mdash;  +++$+++ Thanks, &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 01:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
526434 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526433 +++$+++ 526433 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.166607780E09 +++$+++ Hello ERcheck. I think that everything's in order, but I think that [[User:Tony1\/How_to_satisfy_Criterion_1a:_redundancy_exercises]], a skills training guide for FAC is pretty helpful, as it helps you to be on the lookout for redundant words and such. Certainly after getting [[Ian Thorpe]] through FAC, I noticed that I managed to economise the length of noms more effectively, so that we don't unnecessarily miss stuff because of the backlog. It's also in your right (and I exercise it) to cut extraneous detail which extracts from the part of the blurb which is supposed to thought provoke \"did you know\" ?? ideas. Aside from that, when the RHS of the main page is too short and we don't have space for DYK, I go to BBC and try and find an excuse to put more news items to make the RHS longer. It helps to have more people inspecting the noms for sure. Thanks, ''' +++$+++ : Hello ERcheck. I think that everything's in order, but I think that [[User:Tony1/How_to_satisfy_Criterion_1a:_redundancy_exercises]], a skills training guide for FAC is pretty helpful, as it helps you to be on the lookout for redundant words and such. Certainly after getting [[Ian Thorpe]] through FAC, I noticed that I managed to economise the length of noms more effectively, so that we don't unnecessarily miss stuff because of the backlog. It's also in your right (and I exercise it) to cut extraneous detail which extracts from the part of the blurb which is supposed to thought provoke "did you know" ?? ideas. Aside from that, when the RHS of the main page is too short and we don't have space for DYK, I go to BBC and try and find an excuse to put more news items to make the RHS longer. It helps to have more people inspecting the noms for sure. Thanks, '''[[User:Blnguyen|Blnguyen]]'''  ([[User talk:Blnguyen|bananabucket]]) 01:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

275016 +++$+++ Colslee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-07 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.246963680E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah. I have been trying to become au fait with the finer points of creating pages on Wikipedia that are interesting, accurate and well presented. I originally set up a page for a company but found that it conflicted with policy. That was certainly not my intention. I've redevloped the page as advised by another administrator (who unfortunately is away on leave) but I'd like to keep this work moving. I realise that you are not listed as having an interest in software but you have the endearing quality of being an Aussie. So I thought you might be able to help me, if only to direct me to the right place to get assistance. I can't find much on the site that explains the process well. I have created the page at User talk:Colslee\/once:radix. Can you advise me how to get the page reviewed. I don't want to make the mistake of publishing the page until I am sure I have it right. Many thanks for your time.  +++$+++ Hi Sarah. I have been trying to become au fait with the finer points of creating pages on Wikipedia that are interesting, accurate and well presented. I originally set up a page for a company but found that it conflicted with policy. That was certainly not my intention. I've redevloped the page as advised by another administrator (who unfortunately is away on leave) but I'd like to keep this work moving. I realise that you are not listed as having an interest in software but you have the endearing quality of being an Aussie. So I thought you might be able to help me, if only to direct me to the right place to get assistance. I can't find much on the site that explains the process well. I have created the page at User talk:Colslee/once:radix. Can you advise me how to get the page reviewed. I don't want to make the mistake of publishing the page until I am sure I have it right. Many thanks for your time. [[User:Colslee|Colslee]] ([[User talk:Colslee|talk]]) 03:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
275017 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275016 +++$+++ 275016 +++$+++ 2009-07-07 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.246966140E09 +++$+++ Sure, I'd be happy to take a look at it for you. Unfortunately I'm a little busy right now and about to head out for a couple of hours but would be happy to have a look a bit later. The previous version of this article was deleted as a copyright violation as it was copied from another website. Wikipedia doesn't accept material that has been copied from other sources, so it had to be deleted. The most important thing with articles here is to be able to [[WP:V|verify]] everything with [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Wikipedia only reports what has been published first in what we call \"reliable sources\" (newspaper, magazine, journal articles etc) and doesn't publish new or original information that hasn't first been published elsewhere. So the most important thing to do is to make sure you have plenty of reliable sources and that you are able to source everything in the article. Are you connected with this product or the company? It's okay if you are, we don't forbid people from editing subjects close to them but it is discouraged and instead we encourage people to take a more advisory role and make recommendations that other editors can then implement. This is because it is often very difficult to write in a neutral way about subjects one feels close to. You can read more at the [[WP:COI|COI]] guideline. I will have a read of the article later. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Sure, I'd be happy to take a look at it for you. Unfortunately I'm a little busy right now and about to head out for a couple of hours but would be happy to have a look a bit later. The previous version of this article was deleted as a copyright violation as it was copied from another website. Wikipedia doesn't accept material that has been copied from other sources, so it had to be deleted. The most important thing with articles here is to be able to [[WP:V|verify]] everything with [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Wikipedia only reports what has been published first in what we call "reliable sources" (newspaper, magazine, journal articles etc) and doesn't publish new or original information that hasn't first been published elsewhere. So the most important thing to do is to make sure you have plenty of reliable sources and that you are able to source everything in the article. Are you connected with this product or the company? It's okay if you are, we don't forbid people from editing subjects close to them but it is discouraged and instead we encourage people to take a more advisory role and make recommendations that other editors can then implement. This is because it is often very difficult to write in a neutral way about subjects one feels close to. You can read more at the [[WP:COI|COI]] guideline. I will have a read of the article later. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
275018 +++$+++ Colslee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275016 +++$+++ 275017 +++$+++ 2009-07-07 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.246973340E09 +++$+++ Firstly, I don't know why it was believed to be a copy of another website. I wrote it myself. I am not involved with the company, though I've known the owner for many years. The details of their work have been in the public domain for many years. I can add many more links to published articles but I believe that the most important links are included in the Reference section.  +++$+++ ::Firstly, I don't know why it was believed to be a copy of another website. I wrote it myself. I am not involved with the company, though I've known the owner for many years. The details of their work have been in the public domain for many years. I can add many more links to published articles but I believe that the most important links are included in the Reference section. [[User:Colslee|Colslee]] ([[User talk:Colslee|talk]]) 06:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
275019 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275016 +++$+++ 275018 +++$+++ 2009-07-08 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.247060520E09 +++$+++ Hmmm, I see. To be entirely frank with you, I don't think the sourcing is anywhere near adequate to support a claim of notability and I think it's very likely that it will be nominated for deletion if you post it as it is. I noticed that cite 1 and 2 go to the same ''Computer World'' article by Rodney Gedda, but you seem to have made a mistake and listed the second time you cite it as an article by Nathan Torkington. The features section only cites one source, a wiki page which therefore doesn't qualify as a reliable source. And the history section has no references except for the direct quotation from Rob Napier. Where did all the information come from? You really need to provide references for it. As I said above, Wikipedia only reports what reliable sources have already published and you need to be able to be reference the information or it shouldn't go on Wikipedia. The \"Rich Internet Application Development for Dummies\" page at oreillynet is written by Rob Napier, which is okay for citing a direct quotation but it doesn't count for [[WP:N|notability]] purposes which requires \"significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject\". For trying to establish notability, you have only one source that would qualify - the computerworld.com.au article. You really need to provide references for the information in the article and also find a lot more [[WP:V|verifiable]] articles that could be described as \"significant coverage in [[WP:RS|reliable secondary sources]] that are independent of the subject\" in order to establish that this is a notable piece of software. Otherwise I think its pretty likely to be deleted again. Regarding the copyright problem, I'm not really sure what the copyright concerns were as there was nothing further noted in the log, so you would have to ask PMdrive to explain why he believed it was a copyright violation. Also not really sure what you meant when you said the details are in the public domain, but if you mean that you are using material that Napier has released into the public domain, it still needs to be referenced and if you are incorporating their text we would need confirmation that it was public domain. Also note that your signature should only be used when signing comments that you post on discussion pages and not in the articles themselves. Hope these notes help you. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Hmmm, I see. To be entirely frank with you, I don't think the sourcing is anywhere near adequate to support a claim of notability and I think it's very likely that it will be nominated for deletion if you post it as it is. I noticed that cite 1 and 2 go to the same ''Computer World'' article by Rodney Gedda, but you seem to have made a mistake and listed the second time you cite it as an article by Nathan Torkington. The features section only cites one source, a wiki page which therefore doesn't qualify as a reliable source. And the history section has no references except for the direct quotation from Rob Napier. Where did all the information come from? You really need to provide references for it. As I said above, Wikipedia only reports what reliable sources have already published and you need to be able to be reference the information or it shouldn't go on Wikipedia. The "Rich Internet Application Development for Dummies" page at oreillynet is written by Rob Napier, which is okay for citing a direct quotation but it doesn't count for [[WP:N|notability]] purposes which requires "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". For trying to establish notability, you have only one source that would qualify - the computerworld.com.au article. You really need to provide references for the information in the article and also find a lot more [[WP:V|verifiable]] articles that could be described as "significant coverage in [[WP:RS|reliable secondary sources]] that are independent of the subject" in order to establish that this is a notable piece of software. Otherwise I think its pretty likely to be deleted again. Regarding the copyright problem, I'm not really sure what the copyright concerns were as there was nothing further noted in the log, so you would have to ask PMdrive to explain why he believed it was a copyright violation. Also not really sure what you meant when you said the details are in the public domain, but if you mean that you are using material that Napier has released into the public domain, it still needs to be referenced and if you are incorporating their text we would need confirmation that it was public domain. Also note that your signature should only be used when signing comments that you post on discussion pages and not in the articles themselves. Hope these notes help you. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

12873 +++$+++ J Greb +++$+++ David A +++$+++ 12873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-07 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.307438700E09 +++$+++ -  +++$+++ - [[User:J Greb|J Greb]] ([[User talk:J Greb|talk]]) 02:25, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
12874 +++$+++ David A +++$+++ David A +++$+++ 12873 +++$+++ 12873 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.307463960E09 +++$+++ I have fixed the problem. I noticed a couple of small inaccuracies, as far as I remember about the character.  +++$+++ :I have fixed the problem. I noticed a couple of small inaccuracies, as far as I remember about the character. [[User:David A|Dave]] ([[User talk:David A#top|talk]]) 09:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
12875 +++$+++ J Greb +++$+++ David A +++$+++ 12873 +++$+++ 12874 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.307509500E09 +++$+++ -  +++$+++ ::- [[User:J Greb|J Greb]] ([[User talk:J Greb|talk]]) 22:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

613815 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-27 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.248748260E09 +++$+++ you have mail.  &mdash; +++$+++ you have mail.  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
613816 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613815 +++$+++ 613815 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.248748800E09 +++$+++ Thanks, have seen and replied. .  +++$+++ :Thanks, have seen and replied. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
613817 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613815 +++$+++ 613815 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.248826080E09 +++$+++ - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ : - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 17:08, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
613818 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613815 +++$+++ 613817 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.248826680E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I ran a check and cited my sources at the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ACharles_Darwin&diff=304705156&oldid=304689431 Charles Darwin talk page], confirming the date that Hannes R\xf6st had found in various letters. Browne and van Wyhe's book that I have didn't give the exact date, as far as I could see. Looks like Freeman is wrong on that particular date. Will try to run a check on the other dates when time permits,  +++$+++ ::Thanks, I ran a check and cited my sources at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ACharles_Darwin&diff=304705156&oldid=304689431 Charles Darwin talk page], confirming the date that Hannes Röst had found in various letters. Browne and van Wyhe's book that I have didn't give the exact date, as far as I could see. Looks like Freeman is wrong on that particular date. Will try to run a check on the other dates when time permits, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
613819 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613815 +++$+++ 613818 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.248830520E09 +++$+++ Many thanks, I appreciate your help. - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ :::Many thanks, I appreciate your help. - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 18:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

12877 +++$+++ SGCommand +++$+++ David A +++$+++ 12877 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311646440E09 +++$+++ Thought you meant the fictional organisation and not the book which influenced it!!!-- +++$+++ Thought you meant the fictional organisation and not the book which influenced it!!!--[[User:SGCommand|S]][[User talk:SGCommand|G]][[Special:Contributions/SGCommand|C]]ommand 19:14, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
12878 +++$+++ David A +++$+++ David A +++$+++ 12877 +++$+++ 12877 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311648660E09 +++$+++ Personally, I would like to increase overall awareness, initial discretion, and mental self-defence, of the truth of the matter, to minimise future victims of either demagoguery, overload, or extreme sociopathic mindsets, and in fact mostly focus on the rampant sociopathy encouraging intense immersion splatter game-Internet extremist culture overlap, not remotely turn the entire world into Singapore as some blindsided nutcases apparently think... but of course nobody likes when anybody who has reached any differently nuanced rational conclusion whatsoever is actually more benevolent and averse to causing damage than average, not a convenient onesided extremist raving malevolent lunatic mass-murdering psychopathic embodiment of pure evil who can be punched in the face with a oneliner to disprove absolutely nothing.  Oh well, I am extremely uneven intelligence-talent vise and take almost everything literally, so maybe I can't see parts of the picture, and Morrisson is an uncommonly nice guy at least (\"Seven Soldiers: Frankenstein\" excepted), is uncommonly perceptive, and a terrific writer (even if I dislike the concept of light autistic\/heavy textbook sociopath \"opposites attract\" pairings, such as Cyclops and White Queen, as the latter category are highly abusive in real life, at least going by the few instances that I have talked to), so we'll see. I really like what Batman: Inc stands for so far, and am sure that he will put some interesting spin on the concept.  +++$+++ :Personally, I would like to increase overall awareness, initial discretion, and mental self-defence, of the truth of the matter, to minimise future victims of either demagoguery, overload, or extreme sociopathic mindsets, and in fact mostly focus on the rampant sociopathy encouraging intense immersion splatter game-Internet extremist culture overlap, not remotely turn the entire world into Singapore as some blindsided nutcases apparently think... but of course nobody likes when anybody who has reached any differently nuanced rational conclusion whatsoever is actually more benevolent and averse to causing damage than average, not a convenient onesided extremist raving malevolent lunatic mass-murdering psychopathic embodiment of pure evil who can be punched in the face with a oneliner to disprove absolutely nothing.  Oh well, I am extremely uneven intelligence-talent vise and take almost everything literally, so maybe I can't see parts of the picture, and Morrisson is an uncommonly nice guy at least ("Seven Soldiers: Frankenstein" excepted), is uncommonly perceptive, and a terrific writer (even if I dislike the concept of light autistic/heavy textbook sociopath "opposites attract" pairings, such as Cyclops and White Queen, as the latter category are highly abusive in real life, at least going by the few instances that I have talked to), so we'll see. I really like what Batman: Inc stands for so far, and am sure that he will put some interesting spin on the concept. [[User:David A|Dave]] ([[User talk:David A#top|talk]]) 19:51, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

275023 +++$+++ AdjustShift +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-16 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.247729460E09 +++$+++ Dear Sarah, thanks for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Banning_policy&diff=302227575&oldid=301887091 this] edit. Best wishes,  +++$+++ Dear Sarah, thanks for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Banning_policy&diff=302227575&oldid=301887091 this] edit. Best wishes, [[User:AdjustShift|AdjustShift]] ([[User talk:AdjustShift|talk]]) 00:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
275024 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275023 +++$+++ 275023 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.247731260E09 +++$+++ No worries. By the way, I'm considering presenting evidence relating to Abd's behaviour at the Abd-William M. Connolley arbitration case as his berating of you about your close of the NYScholar discussion appears to be a pattern. Cheers,  +++$+++ :No worries. By the way, I'm considering presenting evidence relating to Abd's behaviour at the Abd-William M. Connolley arbitration case as his berating of you about your close of the NYScholar discussion appears to be a pattern. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
275025 +++$+++ Maunus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275023 +++$+++ 275024 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.247776800E09 +++$+++ Could you please participate in the discussion on the talk page instead of simply reverting the edits that the the editors discussing the policy have suggested? Your reversion seems to be a misunderstanding: according to the policy there are two kinds of community bans only one is made from discussion, the other is caused by admins refusing to unblock and indef blocked user. Even if you remove it the fact about the unblock requests is still in the policy the phrase you remove only sevres to clarify the distinction between the two kinds of ban. +++$+++ ::Could you please participate in the discussion on the talk page instead of simply reverting the edits that the the editors discussing the policy have suggested? Your reversion seems to be a misunderstanding: according to the policy there are two kinds of community bans only one is made from discussion, the other is caused by admins refusing to unblock and indef blocked user. Even if you remove it the fact about the unblock requests is still in the policy the phrase you remove only sevres to clarify the distinction between the two kinds of ban.[[User:Maunus|·Maunus·<span class="Unicode">ƛ</span>·]] 13:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
275026 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275023 +++$+++ 275025 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.247777160E09 +++$+++ (ec)No, I can't, I'm afraid. I can't find exactly where it is being discussed that we require there to be repeated unblock requests to determine a community ban. I will start my own section about it as I'm afraid I don't have the time or interest to read that entire page of lengthy rantings.  +++$+++ :::(ec)No, I can't, I'm afraid. I can't find exactly where it is being discussed that we require there to be repeated unblock requests to determine a community ban. I will start my own section about it as I'm afraid I don't have the time or interest to read that entire page of lengthy rantings. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
275027 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275023 +++$+++ 275025 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.247777880E09 +++$+++ I disagree there have to be repeated unblock requests as there are other ways of determining it, ie by subsequent discussions. However, I'm going to bed and don't have time to deal with it right now so I just reverted myself but I plan to raise this with other admins as I disagree with what's been done to that page recently. I also can't deal with the current talk page, it's just ridiculous for anyone to come in from outside the discussions and highly doubt I'm the only one who feels like that about it. I would suggest that some of those posts belong on a user essay or a noticeboard or something and not on the policy talk page.  +++$+++ :::I disagree there have to be repeated unblock requests as there are other ways of determining it, ie by subsequent discussions. However, I'm going to bed and don't have time to deal with it right now so I just reverted myself but I plan to raise this with other admins as I disagree with what's been done to that page recently. I also can't deal with the current talk page, it's just ridiculous for anyone to come in from outside the discussions and highly doubt I'm the only one who feels like that about it. I would suggest that some of those posts belong on a user essay or a noticeboard or something and not on the policy talk page. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
275028 +++$+++ Abd +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275023 +++$+++ 275027 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.247781960E09 +++$+++ Sarah, you're welcome to present evidence at the RfAr, if it's relevant. As to the \"community ban\" that is alleged to exist with editors who are blocked and not unblocked, there is no way to know if \"no admin is willing to unblock,\" i.e., that the community's collective patience has been exhausted, if there have not been multiple requests with neutral denials, and, based on review of many cases, I find it problematic to even consider a maintained indef block as a \"ban,\" even with multiple denials, if there has been no discussion. For most practical purposes, it's simply an indef block, nothing less, but also little more. The danger in calling it a \"ban,\" because of the other usages of the term, is that a presumption is created that this was based on a consensus of uninvolved editors or other authoritative decision, and then even questioning the block or \"ban\" can be asserted to be disruptive. In the close in question, NYScholar, there was no determination by AdjustShift that there was a \"consensus of uninvolved editors,\" but only his claim that there was a simple \"consensus,\" citing \"73.33%\" of comments, and, clearly, he did not consider involvement, and still has not considered involvement. That doesn't make his ban decision improper, it simply makes it an administrative ban rather than a community one. I'd be happy for ArbComm to review this, so thanks. -- +++$+++ ::::Sarah, you're welcome to present evidence at the RfAr, if it's relevant. As to the "community ban" that is alleged to exist with editors who are blocked and not unblocked, there is no way to know if "no admin is willing to unblock," i.e., that the community's collective patience has been exhausted, if there have not been multiple requests with neutral denials, and, based on review of many cases, I find it problematic to even consider a maintained indef block as a "ban," even with multiple denials, if there has been no discussion. For most practical purposes, it's simply an indef block, nothing less, but also little more. The danger in calling it a "ban," because of the other usages of the term, is that a presumption is created that this was based on a consensus of uninvolved editors or other authoritative decision, and then even questioning the block or "ban" can be asserted to be disruptive. In the close in question, NYScholar, there was no determination by AdjustShift that there was a "consensus of uninvolved editors," but only his claim that there was a simple "consensus," citing "73.33%" of comments, and, clearly, he did not consider involvement, and still has not considered involvement. That doesn't make his ban decision improper, it simply makes it an administrative ban rather than a community one. I'd be happy for ArbComm to review this, so thanks. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 15:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

537169 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-08 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.152343500E09 +++$+++ [[image:SFriendly.gif|18px]] As for, the World Cup, you can immagine, we've gon all mad! If we win, we're going to celebrate till Christmas!-- +++$+++ [[image:SFriendly.gif|18px]] As for, the World Cup, you can immagine, we've gon all mad! If we win, we're going to celebrate till Christmas!--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 00:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
537170 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537169 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-08 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.152344880E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you are all \"blissful\", delirious\", dithyrambic\", \"ecstatic\", \"elysian\" \"enchanted\", \"enraptured\", \"enravished\", \"hysterical\", \"in seventh heaven\", \"possesed\" and \"rhapsodic\"?  +++$+++ :::::Perhaps you are all "blissful", delirious", dithyrambic", "ecstatic", "elysian" "enchanted", "enraptured", "enravished", "hysterical", "in seventh heaven", "possesed" and "rhapsodic"? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

12882 +++$+++ Connormah +++$+++ Kyle1278 +++$+++ 12882 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-23 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.306148820E09 +++$+++ [[Daysland, Alberta]] is a very limited article, and there's an online resource available on it at [http:\/\/www.ourfutureourpast.ca\/loc_hist\/page.aspx?id=964693] - any chance you could maybe do any work on it? I'd do it myself, but I'm a pretty poor content writer, very disorganized and all - I can only do short(ish) biographies - like of [[User:Connormah\/E. W. Day|E. W. Day]], Daysland's founder. Interesting story as well. No need to do this, just thought I'd mention it.  +++$+++ [[Daysland, Alberta]] is a very limited article, and there's an online resource available on it at [http://www.ourfutureourpast.ca/loc_hist/page.aspx?id=964693] - any chance you could maybe do any work on it? I'd do it myself, but I'm a pretty poor content writer, very disorganized and all - I can only do short(ish) biographies - like of [[User:Connormah/E. W. Day|E. W. Day]], Daysland's founder. Interesting story as well. No need to do this, just thought I'd mention it. [[User:Connormah|Connormah]] ([[User talk:Connormah|talk]]) 04:07, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
12883 +++$+++ Connormah +++$+++ Kyle1278 +++$+++ 12882 +++$+++ 12882 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.306302900E09 +++$+++ Sounds great, thank you for taking this one on, I look forward to reading it :) - from what I've read, it has an interesting story.   +++$+++ :Sounds great, thank you for taking this one on, I look forward to reading it :) - from what I've read, it has an interesting story.  [[User:Connormah|Connormah]] ([[User talk:Connormah|talk]]) 22:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
12884 +++$+++ Connormah +++$+++ Kyle1278 +++$+++ 12882 +++$+++ 12883 +++$+++ 2011-06-01 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.306997400E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about it. Whenever you have the time.  +++$+++ ::Don't worry about it. Whenever you have the time. [[User:Connormah|Connormah]] ([[User talk:Connormah|talk]]) 23:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

275029 +++$+++ Aunt Entropy +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275029 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-09 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.247196900E09 +++$+++ It seems there is a consensus to unban with caveats, and I am under the impression that one of those is having a mentor. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=301238952&oldid=301238455 You've been suggested] as a logical candidate to mentor FV, and I agree. Would you consider? Or if you are too busy or otherwise unable at this time, can you recommend someone? Once mentorship is set up, we can move forward with the other conditions and get FV to editing again.  +++$+++ It seems there is a consensus to unban with caveats, and I am under the impression that one of those is having a mentor. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=301238952&oldid=301238455 You've been suggested] as a logical candidate to mentor FV, and I agree. Would you consider? Or if you are too busy or otherwise unable at this time, can you recommend someone? Once mentorship is set up, we can move forward with the other conditions and get FV to editing again. [[User:Aunt Entropy|Auntie E]] ([[User talk:Aunt Entropy|talk]]) 20:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
275030 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275029 +++$+++ 275029 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.247231400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note. Shall pop over there in a moment.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the note. Shall pop over there in a moment. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:10, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

537174 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537174 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-09 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.152496920E09 +++$+++ Aldux, don't you think that [[Bulgarian Muslims]] is a [[Wikipedia:Content forking|fork]] of [[Pomaks]]? Perhaps they should be merged. -- +++$+++ Aldux, don't you think that [[Bulgarian Muslims]] is a [[Wikipedia:Content forking|fork]] of [[Pomaks]]? Perhaps they should be merged. --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 19:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
537175 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537174 +++$+++ 537174 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.152510660E09 +++$+++ Oh, nobody doubts they should and shall be merged; I've already discussed of the thing with Todor, and he agreed; the only reason this still hasn't happened is that I thought that first thre should be a complete article, but unfortunately it's quite hard to work at the same times on Ancient Greece, modern Balkans and Africa, so I'm proceeding much slower than I thought. :-(-- +++$+++ :Oh, nobody doubts they should and shall be merged; I've already discussed of the thing with Todor, and he agreed; the only reason this still hasn't happened is that I thought that first thre should be a complete article, but unfortunately it's quite hard to work at the same times on Ancient Greece, modern Balkans and Africa, so I'm proceeding much slower than I thought. :-(--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 22:51, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

12887 +++$+++ Michig +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-14 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.305417540E09 +++$+++ Sorry, it looks like we both had the same idea at the same time. I've tried to incorporate your additions into the version I saved (mine had a bit more in it or I would have done it the other way round), but please feel free to edit it further. Thanks.-- +++$+++ Sorry, it looks like we both had the same idea at the same time. I've tried to incorporate your additions into the version I saved (mine had a bit more in it or I would have done it the other way round), but please feel free to edit it further. Thanks.--[[User:Michig|Michig]] ([[User talk:Michig|talk]]) 16:59, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
12888 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12887 +++$+++ 12887 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.305417720E09 +++$+++ Yes, thanks, it looks fine. Great minds thinking alike and all that. :) <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ : Yes, thanks, it looks fine. Great minds thinking alike and all that. :) <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 17:02, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

275032 +++$+++ Wiki libs +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-06 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.246921620E09 +++$+++ FYI - I Noticed that you blocked another Gotica IP sock. In looking at the edit histories of the pages he tends to frequent I would wager that {{User|Nickelback12345670}} is also a sock account. Maybe? What do you think? Cheers!  +++$+++ FYI - I Noticed that you blocked another Gotica IP sock. In looking at the edit histories of the pages he tends to frequent I would wager that {{User|Nickelback12345670}} is also a sock account. Maybe? What do you think? Cheers! [[User:156.34.142.110|The Real Libs]]-[[User talk:Wiki libs|speak politely]] 16:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
275033 +++$+++ Wiki libs +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275032 +++$+++ 275032 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.246941480E09 +++$+++ And another account has surfaced {{User|Shnagles}}.  +++$+++ :And another account has surfaced {{User|Shnagles}}. [[User:156.34.142.110|The Real Libs]]-[[User talk:Wiki libs|speak politely]] 21:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
275034 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275032 +++$+++ 275033 +++$+++ 2009-07-07 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.246968780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that. I noticed the Nickelback one last night and thought it looked like him but I was so tired I thought I'd leave it until today. I've blocked both of them now. No doubt that won't be the last of him, though, so feel free to let me or Steve know if you spot any new arrivals. Cheerss  +++$+++ ::Thanks for that. I noticed the Nickelback one last night and thought it looked like him but I was so tired I thought I'd leave it until today. I've blocked both of them now. No doubt that won't be the last of him, though, so feel free to let me or Steve know if you spot any new arrivals. Cheerss [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
275035 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275032 +++$+++ 275032 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.247318940E09 +++$+++ Shnagles contacted me by email and asked to be given another chance. He says he's not Gothica and that he has no other accounts on WP. I checked his IP and, for what it's worth, it's on a completely different range to Gothica. He's agreed to some conditions, that he won't edit war and if his edit gets reverted, he will find a RS and discuss it with the other user instead of revert warring. I will try to keep an eye on things generally but if there's any more problems please give me a ping. I suggested to Shnagles that concerned editors have a discussion about the genres generally and reach some agreement about sourcing them as few of them seem to be sourced and some people seem to be trying to change the genres based on their own opinion from listening to the tracks ([[WP:OR]]).  Cheers,  +++$+++ :Shnagles contacted me by email and asked to be given another chance. He says he's not Gothica and that he has no other accounts on WP. I checked his IP and, for what it's worth, it's on a completely different range to Gothica. He's agreed to some conditions, that he won't edit war and if his edit gets reverted, he will find a RS and discuss it with the other user instead of revert warring. I will try to keep an eye on things generally but if there's any more problems please give me a ping. I suggested to Shnagles that concerned editors have a discussion about the genres generally and reach some agreement about sourcing them as few of them seem to be sourced and some people seem to be trying to change the genres based on their own opinion from listening to the tracks ([[WP:OR]]).  Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

12890 +++$+++ 108.69.80.43 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-18 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.305705720E09 +++$+++ I'm back!  That was a long, unexpected vacation. :)  Would you care to help with some more requests? [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ( +++$+++ I'm back!  That was a long, unexpected vacation. :)  Would you care to help with some more requests? [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.43|talk]]) 01:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
12891 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12890 +++$+++ 12890 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.305707400E09 +++$+++ Sure, but no more than three at a time, please! :) <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ : Sure, but no more than three at a time, please! :) <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 01:30, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
12892 +++$+++ 108.69.80.43 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12890 +++$+++ 12891 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.305714300E09 +++$+++ No problem - I'll give you two!  :)  How about [[Jeff Butler]] and [[Erik Olson (artist)|Erik Olson]]? [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ( +++$+++ ::No problem - I'll give you two!  :)  How about [[Jeff Butler]] and [[Erik Olson (artist)|Erik Olson]]? [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.43|talk]]) 03:25, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
12893 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12890 +++$+++ 12892 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.306473360E09 +++$+++ It's always tough searching for common names like these, as there are so many false hits. I gave it a go. Sorry I was not able to find anything for Olson. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ ::: It's always tough searching for common names like these, as there are so many false hits. I gave it a go. Sorry I was not able to find anything for Olson. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 22:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
12894 +++$+++ 108.69.80.43 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12890 +++$+++ 12893 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.307435460E09 +++$+++ Great work on Butler!  Would it help if I sent you to Olson's [[LinkedIn]] profile? [http:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/erickolson] [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ( +++$+++ ::::Great work on Butler!  Would it help if I sent you to Olson's [[LinkedIn]] profile? [http://www.linkedin.com/in/erickolson] [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.43|talk]]) 01:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
12895 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12890 +++$+++ 12894 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.307475360E09 +++$+++ I'll take a look. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ ::::: I'll take a look. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 12:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
12896 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12890 +++$+++ 12892 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.307617260E09 +++$+++ Is it Eric (as on linkedin) or Erik (as spelled by Wikipedia)? Anyway, I've checked both spellings and used search terms from various things in his profile, but sorry to report I've not found any sources. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ ::: Is it Eric (as on linkedin) or Erik (as spelled by Wikipedia)? Anyway, I've checked both spellings and used search terms from various things in his profile, but sorry to report I've not found any sources. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 04:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
12897 +++$+++ 108.69.80.43 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12890 +++$+++ 12896 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.307646420E09 +++$+++ Ah, well, thanks for checking. [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ( +++$+++ ::::Ah, well, thanks for checking. [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.43|talk]]) 12:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

537181 +++$+++ Bridesmill +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-10 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.152525360E09 +++$+++ }} +++$+++ }}[[User:Bridesmill|Bridesmill]] 02:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
537182 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537181 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.152552120E09 +++$+++ Thanks to all, my friends. As for ''les autres'', it is well known that it's them who are servants of the anti-Christ.... ;-)-- +++$+++ :::::Thanks to all, my friends. As for ''les autres'', it is well known that it's them who are servants of the anti-Christ.... ;-)--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 10:22, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

275038 +++$+++ John Vandenberg +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-12 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.247436360E09 +++$+++ Your vote put me on the edge of my seat for two weeks back in December, and has caused me to ponder often since then.  Irrespective of all the other nonsense, your vote was one of the most desired\/anticipated, so it's nice to finally know why it didn't appear.  Anyway, your recent comments have prompted me to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User%3AJohn_Vandenberg&diff=301678304&oldid=299260547 enact] my drafted [[User:John Vandenberg\/recall|arbitrator recall]] pledge so that the community has a clear path to remove me if that is their wish. <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ Your vote put me on the edge of my seat for two weeks back in December, and has caused me to ponder often since then.  Irrespective of all the other nonsense, your vote was one of the most desired/anticipated, so it's nice to finally know why it didn't appear.  Anyway, your recent comments have prompted me to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AJohn_Vandenberg&diff=301678304&oldid=299260547 enact] my drafted [[User:John Vandenberg/recall|arbitrator recall]] pledge so that the community has a clear path to remove me if that is their wish. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 15:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
275039 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275038 +++$+++ 275038 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.247482380E09 +++$+++ Please don't do that because of me as I would never want any part in recalling you and if by some freakish incident I did it wouldn't be through a drama-filled recall but through a private email.  Over the last few months the Arbitration Committee has come to concern me greatly, but you personally seem to be doing a good job (though I must admit that I wasn't at all comfortable with the Date findings, especially against John which I think was a terrible mistake and I'd urge him to exhaust all avenues of appeal). I'm not actually against the idea of a Council in general and I would support something like it if you or someone else presented it as an editor at a grassroots level rather than imposing from above, as I would likely do with most of your ideas; its actually the implementation that worries me - I think your visions are very interesting but I don't think you have the patience for introducing things slowly or the stomach for community politics and discussions and would prefer to do things drastically and radically, put up with a stink for a few days and cross your fingers and hope that it passes and that people get over it and accept it. As for the election, I pained over it greatly for the whole period of the elections and very much ''wanted'' to support you because I think your visions are very exciting and in some ways you could be the best thing this project has ever had and you are one of few I feel could actually lead it into the next phase of its development. I think I know you pretty well and I believe completely that you have the best intentions for the project at heart, and would only ever do what you really thought was right for the project, that you aren't vulnerable to outside interference, blackmail and personal pressure, cabalism and such. So I wouldn't try to stand in the way of anything you wanted to do, but I was concerned that you have a radical, progressive vision (okay) but don't have the patience for community politics and measured, careful implementation, preferring to implement things drastically and try to surf out the ensuing drama (not so okay IMHO). It feels a lot like being collectively dragged about by the hair. But you know, you're like my dearest friend from Wikipedia and one of very, very few I have, or would have, come to the house, meet my family, etc (I'd be horrified if most people here even knew where I lived!) and if the project ended tomorrow I'd be extremely grateful that I'd be walking away with some true friends. I also think that you've been crucial to Wikimedia Australia getting up and invariably I agree with your ideas and opinions there and I am a supporter of you generally, it's just this one area of implementation that worries me. For routine arbitration matters, cases, trusting you with confidential information, etc I don't have any concerns about you at all. But to be frank, I don't think the arbitrators should be using their positions on the arbitration committee to introduce structural changes outside the mandate of dispute resolution and I'm really quite stunned that you (collective you) would try to do so. If arbitrators want to introduce something like this, they should be doing it in a personal capacity as editors, or, at the most, proposing an idea as a committee and inviting the community to comment and adapt the idea, but not imposing things by force. I'm prepared to entertain the idea that I'm wrong about a lot if this, but even so I don't believe it's the ArbCom's place to introduce a governmental structure or body on the project without the support of the community.  +++$+++ :Please don't do that because of me as I would never want any part in recalling you and if by some freakish incident I did it wouldn't be through a drama-filled recall but through a private email.  Over the last few months the Arbitration Committee has come to concern me greatly, but you personally seem to be doing a good job (though I must admit that I wasn't at all comfortable with the Date findings, especially against John which I think was a terrible mistake and I'd urge him to exhaust all avenues of appeal). I'm not actually against the idea of a Council in general and I would support something like it if you or someone else presented it as an editor at a grassroots level rather than imposing from above, as I would likely do with most of your ideas; its actually the implementation that worries me - I think your visions are very interesting but I don't think you have the patience for introducing things slowly or the stomach for community politics and discussions and would prefer to do things drastically and radically, put up with a stink for a few days and cross your fingers and hope that it passes and that people get over it and accept it. As for the election, I pained over it greatly for the whole period of the elections and very much ''wanted'' to support you because I think your visions are very exciting and in some ways you could be the best thing this project has ever had and you are one of few I feel could actually lead it into the next phase of its development. I think I know you pretty well and I believe completely that you have the best intentions for the project at heart, and would only ever do what you really thought was right for the project, that you aren't vulnerable to outside interference, blackmail and personal pressure, cabalism and such. So I wouldn't try to stand in the way of anything you wanted to do, but I was concerned that you have a radical, progressive vision (okay) but don't have the patience for community politics and measured, careful implementation, preferring to implement things drastically and try to surf out the ensuing drama (not so okay IMHO). It feels a lot like being collectively dragged about by the hair. But you know, you're like my dearest friend from Wikipedia and one of very, very few I have, or would have, come to the house, meet my family, etc (I'd be horrified if most people here even knew where I lived!) and if the project ended tomorrow I'd be extremely grateful that I'd be walking away with some true friends. I also think that you've been crucial to Wikimedia Australia getting up and invariably I agree with your ideas and opinions there and I am a supporter of you generally, it's just this one area of implementation that worries me. For routine arbitration matters, cases, trusting you with confidential information, etc I don't have any concerns about you at all. But to be frank, I don't think the arbitrators should be using their positions on the arbitration committee to introduce structural changes outside the mandate of dispute resolution and I'm really quite stunned that you (collective you) would try to do so. If arbitrators want to introduce something like this, they should be doing it in a personal capacity as editors, or, at the most, proposing an idea as a committee and inviting the community to comment and adapt the idea, but not imposing things by force. I'm prepared to entertain the idea that I'm wrong about a lot if this, but even so I don't believe it's the ArbCom's place to introduce a governmental structure or body on the project without the support of the community. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
275040 +++$+++ John Vandenberg +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275038 +++$+++ 275039 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 07:53:00 +++$+++ 1.247496780E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah.  I'll come back to this when I have a bit more time. <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks Sarah.  I'll come back to this when I have a bit more time. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 07:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
275041 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275038 +++$+++ 275040 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 09:56:00 +++$+++ 1.247504160E09 +++$+++ Take your time good sir. :p I'll be sending you an email soon about a couple of things I'm a bit worried about and want to discuss with you. Just have to find enough time to find some diffs etc, so will give you a ping on ze email soon. :)  +++$+++ :::Take your time good sir. :p I'll be sending you an email soon about a couple of things I'm a bit worried about and want to discuss with you. Just have to find enough time to find some diffs etc, so will give you a ping on ze email soon. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

395365 +++$+++ Deckiller +++$+++ Wisdom89 +++$+++ 395365 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-30 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.288436760E09 +++$+++ Just a heads up from firsthand experience: some users may find it offensive that you are reverting good faith edits in a rollback style. It may be best to just change the edit yourself. As for the specific example, the entire section is probably best deleted, as there is no source confirming that those two tracks will be on the album just as much as BU2B. &mdash; ''' +++$+++ Just a heads up from firsthand experience: some users may find it offensive that you are reverting good faith edits in a rollback style. It may be best to just change the edit yourself. As for the specific example, the entire section is probably best deleted, as there is no source confirming that those two tracks will be on the album just as much as BU2B. &mdash; '''[[User:Deckiller|Deck]][[User talk:Deckiller|iller]]''' 04:06, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
395366 +++$+++ Wisdom89 +++$+++ Wisdom89 +++$+++ 395365 +++$+++ 395365 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.288441020E09 +++$+++ The reversions were indeed marked as \"good faith\", Dec. I didn't use the \"rollback\" feature of Twinkle. Cheers.  +++$+++ :The reversions were indeed marked as "good faith", Dec. I didn't use the "rollback" feature of Twinkle. Cheers. [[User:Wisdom89|'''<font color="#660000">Wisdom89</font>''']] <sub>([[User_talk:Wisdom89|<small><sub><font color="#17001E">T</font></sub></small>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Wisdom89|<small><sup><font color="#17001E">C</font></sup></small>]])</sub> 05:17, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

12898 +++$+++ 108.69.80.43 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-09 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.307646420E09 +++$+++ I'd like to take a slight momentary detour. :)  There are a couple of (non-artist) bio articles from which I'd like to remove the notability template, so hopefully you might have some references for them: [[Michael Dobson (author)]] and [[Steve Miller (game designer)]]. [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ( +++$+++ I'd like to take a slight momentary detour. :)  There are a couple of (non-artist) bio articles from which I'd like to remove the notability template, so hopefully you might have some references for them: [[Michael Dobson (author)]] and [[Steve Miller (game designer)]]. [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.43|talk]]) 12:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
12899 +++$+++ 108.69.80.43 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12898 +++$+++ 12898 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.308130860E09 +++$+++ Great work on Dobson!  [http:\/\/www.dobsonbooks.com\/Site\/About%20Us.html Here is a bio] if you need more info about him. :) [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ( +++$+++ :Great work on Dobson!  [http://www.dobsonbooks.com/Site/About%20Us.html Here is a bio] if you need more info about him. :) [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.43|talk]]) 02:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
12900 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12898 +++$+++ 12899 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.308138060E09 +++$+++ Thanks. If you wanted to add more of the business-related books he has written, you could add from the list at [http:\/\/www.google.ca\/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=inauthor:%22Michael+Singer+Dobson%22 Google Books here]. I added citations to the reviews I could find. <p>I've searched using various strategies for Miller (a very common name!) but was not able to find anything; sorry. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ :: Thanks. If you wanted to add more of the business-related books he has written, you could add from the list at [http://www.google.ca/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=inauthor:%22Michael+Singer+Dobson%22 Google Books here]. I added citations to the reviews I could find. <p>I've searched using various strategies for Miller (a very common name!) but was not able to find anything; sorry. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 04:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
12901 +++$+++ 108.69.80.43 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12898 +++$+++ 12900 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.308165900E09 +++$+++ Apparently he has also worked as a movie reviewer [http:\/\/www.stevemillersband.com\/] (for Rotten Tomatoes?) if that helps. I'll try to find out more about him later. [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ( +++$+++ :::Apparently he has also worked as a movie reviewer [http://www.stevemillersband.com/] (for Rotten Tomatoes?) if that helps. I'll try to find out more about him later. [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.43|talk]]) 12:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
12902 +++$+++ 108.69.80.43 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12898 +++$+++ 12900 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.308472440E09 +++$+++ Didn't really find anything else; at the very least he wrote \"150 Movies You Should (Die Before You) See\" if that helps. [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ( +++$+++ :::Didn't really find anything else; at the very least he wrote "150 Movies You Should (Die Before You) See" if that helps. [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.43|talk]]) 01:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
12903 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12898 +++$+++ 12902 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.308549240E09 +++$+++ I tired including that in the search strategy, but still couldn't find anything. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ :::: I tired including that in the search strategy, but still couldn't find anything. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 22:54, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
12904 +++$+++ 108.69.80.43 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12898 +++$+++ 12903 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309087080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for checking. [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ( +++$+++ :::::Thanks for checking. [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.43|talk]]) 04:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

537187 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537187 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-11 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.152662700E09 +++$+++ u may have to refresh your greek:)... ''dopia'' neutral singular, ''dopioi'' male plural-the speakers of it, ''dopians''... doesn't exist. btw, the ''dopioi'' identify as Greeks. it means ''natives'': dopios<-\u03bd\u03c4\u03cc\u03c0\u03b9\u03bf\u03c2<-'\u03bd\u03c4\u03cc\u03c0\u03b9\u03bf\u03c2<-\u03b5\u03bd\u03c4\u03cc\u03c0\u03b9\u03bf\u03c2(adjective)<-\u03b5\u03bd+\u03c4\u03cc\u03c0\u03bf\u03c2(in+place). Regards -- +++$+++ u may have to refresh your greek:)... ''dopia'' neutral singular, ''dopioi'' male plural-the speakers of it, ''dopians''... doesn't exist. btw, the ''dopioi'' identify as Greeks. it means ''natives'': dopios<-ντόπιος<-'ντόπιος<-εντόπιος(adjective)<-εν+τόπος(in+place). Regards --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 17:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
537188 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537187 +++$+++ 537187 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.152662820E09 +++$+++ There is no \"Dopioi\". It is either \"Ntopioi\" or \"Dopii\" - take your pick. -- +++$+++ :There is no "Dopioi". It is either "Ntopioi" or "Dopii" - take your pick. --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 17:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
537189 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537187 +++$+++ 537188 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.152663840E09 +++$+++ Telex...:p. I bet that Aldux knows how to pronunce them all (it is the same!). maybe i should try the [[International Phonetic Alphabet|IPA]] next time. -- +++$+++ ::Telex...:p. I bet that Aldux knows how to pronunce them all (it is the same!). maybe i should try the [[International Phonetic Alphabet|IPA]] next time. --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 17:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
537190 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537187 +++$+++ 537189 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.152664500E09 +++$+++ Oh well, I'm not the only one who gets it wrong ;-)-- +++$+++ :::Oh well, I'm not the only one who gets it wrong ;-)--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 17:35, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

275047 +++$+++ Short Brigade Harvester Boris +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275047 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-21 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.248166080E09 +++$+++ Your actions have been discussed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Abd-William_M._Connolley\/Evidence&oldid=303159365#Close_encounters_of_the_first_impression here] as relevant to an ongoing arbitration case. You may wish to comment. I have linked a prior version of the page because the person who added this material reverted it and then incorporated the material by reference to the reversion, so as to make it impossible for you simply to search for your name. (Hope that's not too confusing.)  +++$+++ Your actions have been discussed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Evidence&oldid=303159365#Close_encounters_of_the_first_impression here] as relevant to an ongoing arbitration case. You may wish to comment. I have linked a prior version of the page because the person who added this material reverted it and then incorporated the material by reference to the reversion, so as to make it impossible for you simply to search for your name. (Hope that's not too confusing.) [[User:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|Short Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 01:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
275048 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275047 +++$+++ 275047 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.248168480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. I noticed last night that I had been mentioned in the list of people supporting the page ban of Abd, is this what you mean by my \"actions\"? I couldn't see anything else there involving me, but it's highly possible (probable) that I'm missing something. Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know. I noticed last night that I had been mentioned in the list of people supporting the page ban of Abd, is this what you mean by my "actions"? I couldn't see anything else there involving me, but it's highly possible (probable) that I'm missing something. Thanks! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
275049 +++$+++ Short Brigade Harvester Boris +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275047 +++$+++ 275048 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.248169200E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, there was a whole list (actually three lists) of people there. The discussion is a bit convoluted so it's not obvious what the ultimate purpose of the list might be. I'm going on the principle that everyone mentioned in an arbcom case deserves to be informed. It may well be nothing to get concerned about, but by being aware of it you can decide for yourself.  +++$+++ ::Hi Sarah, there was a whole list (actually three lists) of people there. The discussion is a bit convoluted so it's not obvious what the ultimate purpose of the list might be. I'm going on the principle that everyone mentioned in an arbcom case deserves to be informed. It may well be nothing to get concerned about, but by being aware of it you can decide for yourself. [[User:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|Short Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 02:40, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
275050 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275047 +++$+++ 275049 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.248170340E09 +++$+++ No worries and I appreciate you letting me know. I just wasn't sure if there was more to it than the lists. I've been considering submitting some evidence myself but its rather tedious sorting through the slabs of text for diffs. The events leading up to this case have been rather like watching a very slow speed car accident happen before your eyes and my only hope is that this time the ArbCom will send a strong message. Thanks again for the notification, much appreciated. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::No worries and I appreciate you letting me know. I just wasn't sure if there was more to it than the lists. I've been considering submitting some evidence myself but its rather tedious sorting through the slabs of text for diffs. The events leading up to this case have been rather like watching a very slow speed car accident happen before your eyes and my only hope is that this time the ArbCom will send a strong message. Thanks again for the notification, much appreciated. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
275051 +++$+++ Abd +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275047 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.248214500E09 +++$+++ There is just about zero chance of you becoming a \"party of interest\" in the case. That you participated in a discussion among a series of discussions listed as a beginning of evidence directed toward identifying a \"cabal\" means nothing, and SBHB was just stirring up shit, by notifying all the people who were listed (listed with disclaimers that the listings were not accusations). \"Mention\" should mean something substantial, at least it should have become \"discussion\" of the editor. If we look at the linked pages from that evidence section, there are many, many editors listed, down another level, and all that is incorporated by reference. The clerks decided to allow SBHB's canvassing, but canvassing it was. If you have evidence or proposals to submit, '''of course'' you are welcome, but ArbComm cases are not discussions where decision are made by a consensus of the community, as such, but rather by vote of arbitrators, so number of comments mean practically nothing. My apologies if the listing distracted you from anything of more importance. -- +++$+++ :::::There is just about zero chance of you becoming a "party of interest" in the case. That you participated in a discussion among a series of discussions listed as a beginning of evidence directed toward identifying a "cabal" means nothing, and SBHB was just stirring up shit, by notifying all the people who were listed (listed with disclaimers that the listings were not accusations). "Mention" should mean something substantial, at least it should have become "discussion" of the editor. If we look at the linked pages from that evidence section, there are many, many editors listed, down another level, and all that is incorporated by reference. The clerks decided to allow SBHB's canvassing, but canvassing it was. If you have evidence or proposals to submit, '''of course'' you are welcome, but ArbComm cases are not discussions where decision are made by a consensus of the community, as such, but rather by vote of arbitrators, so number of comments mean practically nothing. My apologies if the listing distracted you from anything of more importance. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 15:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

12905 +++$+++ 108.69.80.43 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12905 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-26 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309087080E09 +++$+++ How about [[Joel Billings]]?  Seems to be that someone who started a successful company like SSI should have something written about him... [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ( +++$+++ How about [[Joel Billings]]?  Seems to be that someone who started a successful company like SSI should have something written about him... [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.43|talk]]) 04:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
12906 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12905 +++$+++ 12905 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.309165440E09 +++$+++ I found that the ''Austin American Statesman'' article was reprinted [http:\/\/articles.philly.com\/1990-07-05\/entertainment\/25896699_1_war-games-computer-war-action-stations here] in the ''Philadelphia Inquirer'', in case you wanted to take a look. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ : I found that the ''Austin American Statesman'' article was reprinted [http://articles.philly.com/1990-07-05/entertainment/25896699_1_war-games-computer-war-action-stations here] in the ''Philadelphia Inquirer'', in case you wanted to take a look. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 02:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
12907 +++$+++ 108.69.80.43 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12905 +++$+++ 12906 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.312536360E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  :)  While we're on the topic of computer games, it seems odd to me that someone like [[Feargus Urquhart]] or [[Ray Muzyka]] would be so lacking in sources, or even [[Don Daglow]] for that matter. [[Special:Contributions\/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ( +++$+++ ::Thanks!  :)  While we're on the topic of computer games, it seems odd to me that someone like [[Feargus Urquhart]] or [[Ray Muzyka]] would be so lacking in sources, or even [[Don Daglow]] for that matter. [[Special:Contributions/108.69.80.43|108.69.80.43]] ([[User talk:108.69.80.43|talk]]) 02:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

12908 +++$+++ WhiteWriter  +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-28 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.306625280E09 +++$+++ Please, just delete [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Kosovo-note&diff=prev&oldid=431353040 edit summary] made by that vandal... Thanks --<span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ Please, just delete [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Kosovo-note&diff=prev&oldid=431353040 edit summary] made by that vandal... Thanks --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter |WhiteWriter ]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 16:28, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
12909 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12908 +++$+++ 12908 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.306625400E09 +++$+++ I've made a request through [[WP:RFO]]; it should be gone within minutes. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ : I've made a request through [[WP:RFO]]; it should be gone within minutes. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 16:30, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
12910 +++$+++ WhiteWriter  +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12908 +++$+++ 12909 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.306625640E09 +++$+++ Ooo, thanks very much. Disruptive editing of that level is incomprehensible to me... Thanks. --<span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ ::Ooo, thanks very much. Disruptive editing of that level is incomprehensible to me... Thanks. --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter |WhiteWriter ]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 16:34, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
12911 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12908 +++$+++ 12910 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.306625880E09 +++$+++ The anonymity of the Internet brings out some strangeness. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ ::: The anonymity of the Internet brings out some strangeness. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 16:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

275053 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-26 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.248598260E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 01:51, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
275054 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275053 +++$+++ 275053 +++$+++ 2009-07-26 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.248605160E09 +++$+++ Gotcha. :)  +++$+++ :Gotcha. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
275055 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275053 +++$+++ 275054 +++$+++ 2009-07-26 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.248620340E09 +++$+++ Read and returned - I think you may have swung me but a last question or two from you.  I hope I'm not being too intrusive on your time.-- +++$+++ ::Read and returned - I think you may have swung me but a last question or two from you.  I hope I'm not being too intrusive on your time.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 07:59, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

12912 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-07 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.307472360E09 +++$+++ Generally don't you keep these, for AfD purposes, and esp since the page is a redirect and will be created at some point? <span style=\"background:silver;font-family:Kristen ITC;\"> +++$+++ Generally don't you keep these, for AfD purposes, and esp since the page is a redirect and will be created at some point? <span style="background:silver;font-family:Kristen ITC;">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="red">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="yellow">J</font><font color="green">F</font><font color="blue">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]]</span> 11:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
12913 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12912 +++$+++ 12912 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.307474940E09 +++$+++ I had been thinking no, in this case, because it would eventually appear at a different title since they're supposed to be disambiguated by year not network (and there was nothing but project tags on the talk page anyway). But I see someone has already created a redirect at the \"Fox Television\" version of the title, so you're right that it would probably be useful. I'll restore the talk page and add an oldAfD tag there. Thanks. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ : I had been thinking no, in this case, because it would eventually appear at a different title since they're supposed to be disambiguated by year not network (and there was nothing but project tags on the talk page anyway). But I see someone has already created a redirect at the "Fox Television" version of the title, so you're right that it would probably be useful. I'll restore the talk page and add an oldAfD tag there. Thanks. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 12:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
12914 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12912 +++$+++ 12913 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.307475060E09 +++$+++ Thank you, <span style=\"background:silver;font-family:Kristen ITC;\"> +++$+++ ::Thank you, <span style="background:silver;font-family:Kristen ITC;">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="red">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="yellow">J</font><font color="green">F</font><font color="blue">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]]</span> 12:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

275057 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-27 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.248684480E09 +++$+++ Just to keep you informed I have left a new message [[User_talk:Mattinbgn#GLAM-Wikimedia_Australia|here]] and [[User_talk:Bidgee#Wikimedia_Australia_GLAM|a further message here]].  Is there anything you can think of to add?-- +++$+++ Just to keep you informed I have left a new message [[User_talk:Mattinbgn#GLAM-Wikimedia_Australia|here]] and [[User_talk:Bidgee#Wikimedia_Australia_GLAM|a further message here]].  Is there anything you can think of to add?--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 01:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
275058 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275057 +++$+++ 275057 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.248715620E09 +++$+++ Hi Mr Steve. That's a pity that Matt has prior commitments. It would have been great to have seen him there. I'm really thrilled that you're coming, however, and hopefully Bidgee will be able to organise his studies so he can come, too. I believe that Blng, Lankiveil, and Daniel will also be coming (Why do I always feel so outnumbered by men on this project?! We seriously need to have a recruitment drive for Australian women! LOL).  +++$+++ :Hi Mr Steve. That's a pity that Matt has prior commitments. It would have been great to have seen him there. I'm really thrilled that you're coming, however, and hopefully Bidgee will be able to organise his studies so he can come, too. I believe that Blng, Lankiveil, and Daniel will also be coming (Why do I always feel so outnumbered by men on this project?! We seriously need to have a recruitment drive for Australian women! LOL). [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:27, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
275059 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275057 +++$+++ 275058 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.248722400E09 +++$+++ Maybe if Blnguyen, Lankiveil, and Daniel posted their image on their user page. Want me to ask? :) -- +++$+++ ::Maybe if Blnguyen, Lankiveil, and Daniel posted their image on their user page. Want me to ask? :) --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 12:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

537202 +++$+++ Andypandy.UK +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537202 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-12 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.152726540E09 +++$+++ <big>Congrats! Have fun moppin'.<\/big>--<font style=\"background:white\"> +++$+++ <big>Congrats! Have fun moppin'.</big>--<font style="background:white">[[User:Andypandy.UK|Andeh]]</font> 10:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
537203 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537202 +++$+++ 537202 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.152744180E09 +++$+++ Come on guys, you'll make me blush...;-)-- +++$+++ :Come on guys, you'll make me blush...;-)--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 15:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

12915 +++$+++ Jorgenev +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12915 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-14 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.308069660E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I have ''so much'' praise I could give you Paul Erik. You are pretty much my [[archetypal]] quality editor, and I will leave it at that. I'm glad you are here and I'll miss you, to the extent I can miss anonymous internet strangers, when you are gone. I know this barnstar may seem like it is kind of coming out of nowhere, but you deserve it. Seriously. <big>\u263a<\/big> <small>''' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I have ''so much'' praise I could give you Paul Erik. You are pretty much my [[archetypal]] quality editor, and I will leave it at that. I'm glad you are here and I'll miss you, to the extent I can miss anonymous internet strangers, when you are gone. I know this barnstar may seem like it is kind of coming out of nowhere, but you deserve it. Seriously. <big>☺</big> <small>'''[[User:Jorgenev#top|jorgenev]]'''</small> 09:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
12916 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12915 +++$+++ 12915 +++$+++ 2011-06-14 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.308078720E09 +++$+++ Thanks; that's very nice of you! <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ : Thanks; that's very nice of you! <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 12:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

275060 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275060 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-24 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.248434280E09 +++$+++ I haven't received an invitation to the Wikimedia Australia GLAM conference. I'll have to see if I can get time off from my study and find away to get to Canberra and stay.  +++$+++ I haven't received an invitation to the Wikimedia Australia GLAM conference. I'll have to see if I can get time off from my study and find away to get to Canberra and stay. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 04:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
275061 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275060 +++$+++ 275060 +++$+++ 2009-07-24 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.248436260E09 +++$+++ Oh okay, I'll make sure Liam puts you on the invite list. You could also just go for one day if it's difficult to get away for both. If you're able to oragnise the time away from study, you can request a bursary to cover your airfare. Anyway, just thought I'd mention it. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Oh okay, I'll make sure Liam puts you on the invite list. You could also just go for one day if it's difficult to get away for both. If you're able to oragnise the time away from study, you can request a bursary to cover your airfare. Anyway, just thought I'd mention it. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
275062 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275060 +++$+++ 275061 +++$+++ 2009-07-24 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.248438300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help with the matter on my page Sarah - I have left a message there also.  Also I haven't received any (more\/new) information regarding Wiki Aus GLAM - not sure if I can make it also but just thought I'd tell you so you can add my name to Liam's invite list.  Just so you know also there are no flights between Wagga Wagga and Canberra unless you fly via Melbourne or Sydney which would be a bit backwards and add a couple of hours; however driving from here to Canberra is only about 2.5 hours.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks for your help with the matter on my page Sarah - I have left a message there also.  Also I haven't received any (more/new) information regarding Wiki Aus GLAM - not sure if I can make it also but just thought I'd tell you so you can add my name to Liam's invite list.  Just so you know also there are no flights between Wagga Wagga and Canberra unless you fly via Melbourne or Sydney which would be a bit backwards and add a couple of hours; however driving from here to Canberra is only about 2.5 hours.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 05:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
275063 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275060 +++$+++ 275062 +++$+++ 2009-07-24 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.248438900E09 +++$+++ Thanks Steve. I do hope you end up being able to come, that would be great. I'm pretty sure that you're on the 'invite list' from when I registered your name to receive an invitation. There have been a couple of update emails since then but they only go out to people who have registered. They're on the Wikimedia Australia wiki [http:\/\/wikimedia.org.au\/wiki\/GLAM\/Attendee_mailouts\/Email_1 here] and [http:\/\/wikimedia.org.au\/wiki\/GLAM\/Attendee_mailouts\/Email_2 here]. 2.5 hours isn't too bad. That's about how long it will take me to get there too, between driving to the airport and then flying up. Anyway, hope to see you both there. :)  +++$+++ :::Thanks Steve. I do hope you end up being able to come, that would be great. I'm pretty sure that you're on the 'invite list' from when I registered your name to receive an invitation. There have been a couple of update emails since then but they only go out to people who have registered. They're on the Wikimedia Australia wiki [http://wikimedia.org.au/wiki/GLAM/Attendee_mailouts/Email_1 here] and [http://wikimedia.org.au/wiki/GLAM/Attendee_mailouts/Email_2 here]. 2.5 hours isn't too bad. That's about how long it will take me to get there too, between driving to the airport and then flying up. Anyway, hope to see you both there. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
275064 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275060 +++$+++ 275063 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.248891600E09 +++$+++ Good news - you may have some to here also (in terms of ideas for rooms). [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AVirtualSteve&diff=304859654&oldid=304857774] Best regards.-- +++$+++ ::::Good news - you may have some to here also (in terms of ideas for rooms). [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AVirtualSteve&diff=304859654&oldid=304857774] Best regards.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 11:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
275065 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275060 +++$+++ 275064 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.248894000E09 +++$+++ Sarah, I entered the wrong email address (No longer active). I do have the order ID. Who do I contact?  +++$+++ :::::Sarah, I entered the wrong email address (No longer active). I do have the order ID. Who do I contact? [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 12:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
275066 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275060 +++$+++ 275065 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.248896280E09 +++$+++ Bidgee - I think you could contact [[user:witty lama|Liam]] in Sarah's absence.-- +++$+++ ::::::Bidgee - I think you could contact [[user:witty lama|Liam]] in Sarah's absence.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VirtualSteve</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|need admin support?]]</sup> 12:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

12917 +++$+++ Gran2 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12917 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-17 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.308374700E09 +++$+++ Hi, I see that you blocked {{user|FictionalCharacterGuy}} and warned him not to create a new account to avoid the ban... well I'm not 100% sure, but I think that {{user|JJRWilkinson}} and {{IP|114.77.180.7}} are the same user; they have been making the same kinds of unsourced, style-violating edits as FictionalCharacterGuy. Again, I don't know for sure, but this is just a heads up. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi, I see that you blocked {{user|FictionalCharacterGuy}} and warned him not to create a new account to avoid the ban... well I'm not 100% sure, but I think that {{user|JJRWilkinson}} and {{IP|114.77.180.7}} are the same user; they have been making the same kinds of unsourced, style-violating edits as FictionalCharacterGuy. Again, I don't know for sure, but this is just a heads up. Thanks, [[User:Gran2|Gran]]<sup>[[User talk:Gran2|2]]</sup> 22:25, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
12918 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12917 +++$+++ 12917 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.308452820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for alerting me. Those look very much like the same user as FictionalCharacterGuy. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ : Thanks for alerting me. Those look very much like the same user as FictionalCharacterGuy. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 20:07, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
12919 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12917 +++$+++ 12917 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.308455040E09 +++$+++ For an update, see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Courcelles&oldid=434987258#Sock_puppet_second_opinion here]. I'll keep an eye on the IP. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ : For an update, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Courcelles&oldid=434987258#Sock_puppet_second_opinion here]. I'll keep an eye on the IP. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 20:44, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

537206 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-12 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.152736320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 13:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
537207 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537206 +++$+++ 537206 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.152741720E09 +++$+++ Ha ha! And... el:''cetriolli'' for your adminship too!  +++$+++ :Ha ha! And... el:''cetriolli'' for your adminship too! [[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">:N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>:</span>]] 15:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

12920 +++$+++ Inhumer +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-21 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.308644220E09 +++$+++ An anon you previously blocked for editwarring continues to do so on the [[Envy (band)|Envy]] and [[post-rock]] pages. +++$+++ An anon you previously blocked for editwarring continues to do so on the [[Envy (band)|Envy]] and [[post-rock]] pages.[[User:Inhumer|Inhumer]] ([[User talk:Inhumer|talk]]) 01:17, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
12921 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12920 +++$+++ 12920 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.308658020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. I had blocked because their previous edits were clearly vandalism such as [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Screamo&diff=prev&oldid=434701101 this], and I should have just noted \"vandalism\" in the block log, rather than adding \"edit warring\". Their recent edits since their block appear to be in good faith, and since they've never been warned about the consequences of edit warring, I've added a warning to their talk page instead of blocking them now. We'll see if that helps; if not, a block can be issued (and it might be faster to report it to the noticeboard [[WP:ANEW]] as I might not be around consistently). Thanks again. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ : Thanks for letting me know. I had blocked because their previous edits were clearly vandalism such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Screamo&diff=prev&oldid=434701101 this], and I should have just noted "vandalism" in the block log, rather than adding "edit warring". Their recent edits since their block appear to be in good faith, and since they've never been warned about the consequences of edit warring, I've added a warning to their talk page instead of blocking them now. We'll see if that helps; if not, a block can be issued (and it might be faster to report it to the noticeboard [[WP:ANEW]] as I might not be around consistently). Thanks again. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 05:07, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

570132 +++$+++ Messedrocker +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-15 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.189919400E09 +++$+++ Hello, David Gothberg. I intend on porting the lovely Ambox to Wikinews. Tell me everything I need to know about it on my talk page.  +++$+++ Hello, David Gothberg. I intend on porting the lovely Ambox to Wikinews. Tell me everything I need to know about it on my talk page. [[User:Messedrocker|MessedRocker]] ([[User talk:Messedrocker|talk]]) 22:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
570133 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570132 +++$+++ 570132 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.189920540E09 +++$+++ Ok, CU on IRC perhaps tomorrow if we are lucky. -- +++$+++ :Ok, CU on IRC perhaps tomorrow if we are lucky. --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 22:29, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
570134 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570132 +++$+++ 570132 +++$+++ 2007-09-16 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.189959540E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 09:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

12922 +++$+++ Fishhead2100 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12922 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.309678140E09 +++$+++ Thank you for locking [[UFC 132]].  I posted on two other admin talk pages to see if someone would lock it.  I would try to revert the vandalism, but it was coming too fast.  <span style=\"background:black\"><span style=\"color:red\">Mr. C.C.<\/span><sup> +++$+++ Thank you for locking [[UFC 132]].  I posted on two other admin talk pages to see if someone would lock it.  I would try to revert the vandalism, but it was coming too fast.  <span style="background:black"><span style="color:red">Mr. C.C.</span><sup>[[User talk:Fishhead2100|<span style="color:white">Hey yo!</span>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Fishhead2100|<span style="color:red">I didn't do it!</span>]]</sub></span> 00:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
12923 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12922 +++$+++ 12922 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.309678260E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Yes, I protected it because I had seen your messages on other admins' talk pages. Thanks for that. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ : You're welcome. Yes, I protected it because I had seen your messages on other admins' talk pages. Thanks for that. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 00:31, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
12924 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ 12922 +++$+++ 12922 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312482960E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks for your message. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ : Okay, thanks for your message. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 11:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

275068 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275068 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-08 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.249746120E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah.  It was great to catch up, and as I said to Steve, if you're ever over this way, then please let me know.  As mentioned, I'd be grateful if you could have a sqizzie at this.  &ndash; +++$+++ Hi Sarah.  It was great to catch up, and as I said to Steve, if you're ever over this way, then please let me know.  As mentioned, I'd be grateful if you could have a sqizzie at this.  &ndash;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 08:42, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
275069 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275068 +++$+++ 275068 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.249900620E09 +++$+++ Thanks Moondyne and likewise when you're in Melbourne again. It was fabulous meeting you and the other boys after working with you all for so long and I was really delighted that you were able to come down to APH with us. I've emailed Roxanne and am keeping my fingers crossed for the images. :) Thanks for the link, I'm really busy right now but will try to take a look in the next day or two. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks Moondyne and likewise when you're in Melbourne again. It was fabulous meeting you and the other boys after working with you all for so long and I was really delighted that you were able to come down to APH with us. I've emailed Roxanne and am keeping my fingers crossed for the images. :) Thanks for the link, I'm really busy right now but will try to take a look in the next day or two. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
275070 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275068 +++$+++ 275069 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.249907460E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I wouldn't be surprised if Roxanne balked wrt the NC issue.  But you never know: we can only ask.  &ndash; +++$+++ ::Thanks.  I wouldn't be surprised if Roxanne balked wrt the NC issue.  But you never know: we can only ask.  &ndash;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 05:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
275071 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275068 +++$+++ 275070 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.249922100E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that's always possible and I'm not counting my chickens, but she has given me images under cc-by-sa before and confirmed the licensing of other govt portraits were okay (Kim Carr was one example), so I'm not too concerned about it. But if she changes her mind, it doesn't matter. I'm just glad to have had the opportunity to meet her face-to-face after over a year of emails back and forth and have a chat and continue working with her in any way she's okay with. :) By the way, I gave your sexy t-shirt to Gnang and he took it back to WA for you. I know you'll be desperate to get your hands on it again so thought I better update you on that! lol  +++$+++ :::Yeah, that's always possible and I'm not counting my chickens, but she has given me images under cc-by-sa before and confirmed the licensing of other govt portraits were okay (Kim Carr was one example), so I'm not too concerned about it. But if she changes her mind, it doesn't matter. I'm just glad to have had the opportunity to meet her face-to-face after over a year of emails back and forth and have a chat and continue working with her in any way she's okay with. :) By the way, I gave your sexy t-shirt to Gnang and he took it back to WA for you. I know you'll be desperate to get your hands on it again so thought I better update you on that! lol [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
275072 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275068 +++$+++ 275070 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.249922100E09 +++$+++ PS When I got back to the hotel, I noticed the APH Escorted Visitor tags have printed on them front and back that you have to return them to the security guards. So don't be surprised if the Feds come to arrest you! :D  +++$+++ :::PS When I got back to the hotel, I noticed the APH Escorted Visitor tags have printed on them front and back that you have to return them to the security guards. So don't be surprised if the Feds come to arrest you! :D [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

585276 +++$+++ J.delanoy +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-01 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.207034400E09 +++$+++ I had asked a person on Flickr to change the license on one of his pictures. He replied on my talk page and he included some contact info. A few seconds later, he removed the contact info. As an admin, is it possible for you to delete a revision from the history so only admins can see it? Or should I request oversight? Thanks.  +++$+++ I had asked a person on Flickr to change the license on one of his pictures. He replied on my talk page and he included some contact info. A few seconds later, he removed the contact info. As an admin, is it possible for you to delete a revision from the history so only admins can see it? Or should I request oversight? Thanks. [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="#ffe800">J.d</font><font color="#00ff00">ela</font><font color="green">noy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<sub><font color="blue">adds</font></sub>]] 00:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
585277 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585276 +++$+++ 585276 +++$+++ 2008-04-01 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.207039920E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ :Done. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 01:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

12928 +++$+++ InfernoXV +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-03 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.172927580E09 +++$+++ Misha, I've never heard the word 'crucession' used anywhere. It doesn't return a single hit on Google, and I've never seen it used in books of any tradition - is this a neologism? It seems the entire article can go under Processions.  +++$+++ Misha, I've never heard the word 'crucession' used anywhere. It doesn't return a single hit on Google, and I've never seen it used in books of any tradition - is this a neologism? It seems the entire article can go under Processions. [[User:InfernoXV|InfernoXV]] 05:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
12929 +++$+++  +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12928 +++$+++ 12928 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Many thanks for your comments.  With luck we can keep this article NPOV.Roger Pearse 08:12, 16 March 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :Many thanks for your comments.  With luck we can keep this article NPOV.Roger Pearse 08:12, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

537217 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-15 10:42:00 +++$+++ 1.152985320E09 +++$+++ If you want to watch an article, watch [[Greeks]]. It's been trolled by two anons - one (most likely User:Kamikazi2) who keeps replacing the census data for FYROM with the JP figures, and another one who keeps messing with the number of Greeks in Greece in favour of an WP:OR figure. -- +++$+++ If you want to watch an article, watch [[Greeks]]. It's been trolled by two anons - one (most likely User:Kamikazi2) who keeps replacing the census data for FYROM with the JP figures, and another one who keeps messing with the number of Greeks in Greece in favour of an WP:OR figure. --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 10:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
537218 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537217 +++$+++ 537217 +++$+++ 2006-07-15 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.152987420E09 +++$+++ Do you think you could do something about that anon who just violated the 3RR (was warned). If I report him (due to the backlog at AN3), it'll take years until something is actually done about it. -- +++$+++ :Do you think you could do something about that anon who just violated the 3RR (was warned). If I report him (due to the backlog at AN3), it'll take years until something is actually done about it. --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 11:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

275074 +++$+++ Hans Adler +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-13 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.250196540E09 +++$+++ Hi, I commented on an ANI thread [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Outing_by_BullRangifer] at the same time that you marked it resolved. I tried to summarise the outcome and I think I brought up a few new points. It would be great if you could comment once more. There is also a new comment by Stmrlbs there.  +++$+++ Hi, I commented on an ANI thread [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Outing_by_BullRangifer] at the same time that you marked it resolved. I tried to summarise the outcome and I think I brought up a few new points. It would be great if you could comment once more. There is also a new comment by Stmrlbs there. [[User:Hans Adler|Hans]] [[User talk:Hans Adler|Adler]] 13:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
275075 +++$+++ Levine2112 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275074 +++$+++ 275074 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.250207880E09 +++$+++ I would also appreciate it if you could make further comment as well as respond to my request to email me the 5 website links which reveal my real life identity that you mentioned I had posted on my user page. At the moment, I am totally clueless as to what they could be. Thanks. -- <b><font color=\"#996600\" face=\"times new roman,times\"> +++$+++ : I would also appreciate it if you could make further comment as well as respond to my request to email me the 5 website links which reveal my real life identity that you mentioned I had posted on my user page. At the moment, I am totally clueless as to what they could be. Thanks. -- <b><font color="#996600" face="times new roman,times">[[User:Levine2112|ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ]]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background:#FFFF99">[[User talk:Levine2112|ssnɔsıp]]</font></sup> 16:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
275076 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275074 +++$+++ 275075 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.250350920E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks. It looks like that page has been archived and I don't really have anything further to add anyway. I haven't really had much time at present and haven't edited WP since I last posted in that discussion, but I have your email and will send you a copy of the history of your userpage when I have a minute (either tonight or tomorrow).  +++$+++ ::Okay, thanks. It looks like that page has been archived and I don't really have anything further to add anyway. I haven't really had much time at present and haven't edited WP since I last posted in that discussion, but I have your email and will send you a copy of the history of your userpage when I have a minute (either tonight or tomorrow). [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:42, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
275077 +++$+++ Levine2112 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275074 +++$+++ 275076 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.250387220E09 +++$+++ Much appreciated, Sarah! I don't entirely doubt that those 5 website which you say have outed me exist in the history of my User page, but at this moment in time I am baffled as to what they can be. :-) So when you do have the time, I'd love to have this personal mystery solved. Thanks! -- <b><font color=\"#996600\" face=\"times new roman,times\"> +++$+++ ::: Much appreciated, Sarah! I don't entirely doubt that those 5 website which you say have outed me exist in the history of my User page, but at this moment in time I am baffled as to what they can be. :-) So when you do have the time, I'd love to have this personal mystery solved. Thanks! -- <b><font color="#996600" face="times new roman,times">[[User:Levine2112|ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ]]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background:#FFFF99">[[User talk:Levine2112|ssnɔsıp]]</font></sup> 18:47, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
275078 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275074 +++$+++ 275077 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.250515080E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your patience. I've sent you an email with the details and am hoping it was just research for article or something. :) Regards,  +++$+++ ::::Thank you for your patience. I've sent you an email with the details and am hoping it was just research for article or something. :) Regards, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

537219 +++$+++ PierreLarcin2 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-15 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.153007700E09 +++$+++ Place it here, so I can answer. If nothing between two days -clock in the hand-, I replace the both phrases.  +++$+++ Place it here, so I can answer. If nothing between two days -clock in the hand-, I replace the both phrases. [[User:PierreLarcin2|PierreLarcin2]] 16:55, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
537220 +++$+++ PierreLarcin2 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537219 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-15 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.153007940E09 +++$+++ Bridesmill, explain here CLEARLY what you talked : \"I had deleted that way back in june - but with cause as explained above.\" BTW - the source for their membership is probably the Rotary site itself isn't it? I wouldn't call that 'manipulating the internet to hide the truth'. For Christ'sake where did you see that phrase under my pen about proximity between rotarians P. Bush and Rotarian Lindbergh ?  +++$+++ :: Bridesmill, explain here CLEARLY what you talked : "I had deleted that way back in june - but with cause as explained above." BTW - the source for their membership is probably the Rotary site itself isn't it? I wouldn't call that 'manipulating the internet to hide the truth'. For Christ'sake where did you see that phrase under my pen about proximity between rotarians P. Bush and Rotarian Lindbergh ? [[User:PierreLarcin2|PierreLarcin2]] 16:59, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

537222 +++$+++ Cigor +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-15 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.153015320E09 +++$+++ I know it is ridiculous. When [[User:Objectivee ]] did his first change, I thought to myself this is so silly, nobody will believe. However I will have limited participation in the article, I would really prefer some moderate Albanian ideally from Macedonia to be involved.-- +++$+++ I know it is ridiculous. When [[User:Objectivee ]] did his first change, I thought to myself this is so silly, nobody will believe. However I will have limited participation in the article, I would really prefer some moderate Albanian ideally from Macedonia to be involved.--[[User:Cigor|Cigor]] 19:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
537223 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537222 +++$+++ 537222 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.153074600E09 +++$+++ Yes, I understand, and I would be happy if a sensible editor like Telex would do the work. As for dedicated Macedonian Albanians, I haven't as yet seen much; telling the truth, in a year of activity, I have found only two active \"Albanian\" editors really interested in Macedonia, that is REX (no more active, I think) and Telex.-- +++$+++ :Yes, I understand, and I would be happy if a sensible editor like Telex would do the work. As for dedicated Macedonian Albanians, I haven't as yet seen much; telling the truth, in a year of activity, I have found only two active "Albanian" editors really interested in Macedonia, that is REX (no more active, I think) and Telex.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 11:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

275079 +++$+++ Who then was a gentleman? +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275079 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-24 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.251161700E09 +++$+++ He ws a ranting individual, I didn't feel that needed to be on a User page.   +++$+++ He ws a ranting individual, I didn't feel that needed to be on a User page.  [[User:Who then was a gentleman?|Who then was a gentleman?]] ([[User talk:Who then was a gentleman?|talk]]) 17:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
275080 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275079 +++$+++ 275079 +++$+++ 2009-08-25 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.251197640E09 +++$+++ What? \"He\" wasn't a ranting individual but a blp subject who was trying to ask for help and advice regarding her biography. Of course it didn't need to be on the userpage - she obviously placed it there by mistake as she's not a Wikipedian and doesn't understand how Wikipedia works and was trying to ask for help from someone who had gone out of his way to help her a couple of years ago.  +++$+++ :What? "He" wasn't a ranting individual but a blp subject who was trying to ask for help and advice regarding her biography. Of course it didn't need to be on the userpage - she obviously placed it there by mistake as she's not a Wikipedian and doesn't understand how Wikipedia works and was trying to ask for help from someone who had gone out of his way to help her a couple of years ago. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:54, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

537224 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-15 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.153020360E09 +++$+++ Hi! and congradulations! (for the 2nd time in one week!). can u please take a look in this article? anon IPs and 'well-known' users push POV and remove sourced info. i am not sure if i should ask for protection of the article, but i think that semi protection is really needed:(... -- +++$+++ Hi! and congradulations! (for the 2nd time in one week!). can u please take a look in this article? anon IPs and 'well-known' users push POV and remove sourced info. i am not sure if i should ask for protection of the article, but i think that semi protection is really needed:(... --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 20:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
537225 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537224 +++$+++ 537224 +++$+++ 2006-07-15 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.153020660E09 +++$+++ Yes. Policy permits it - Francis just blocked an IP for 3RR, and he evaded it (probably via open proxies) and continued reverting. You can to it ''to stop blocked users editing'' with the {{tl|sprotect-banneduser}} tag. -- +++$+++ :Yes. Policy permits it - Francis just blocked an IP for 3RR, and he evaded it (probably via open proxies) and continued reverting. You can to it ''to stop blocked users editing'' with the {{tl|sprotect-banneduser}} tag. --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 20:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
537226 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537224 +++$+++ 537224 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.153073340E09 +++$+++ He was using open proxies and Francis blocked them all (for 24 hours each). However, I think one of them ''slipped'', and he made a revert under his own IP (the one from Romania - {{userblock|86.124.112.36}}). This is why I think he's suddenly dissapeared ;-) -- +++$+++ :He was using open proxies and Francis blocked them all (for 24 hours each). However, I think one of them ''slipped'', and he made a revert under his own IP (the one from Romania - {{userblock|86.124.112.36}}). This is why I think he's suddenly dissapeared ;-) --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 11:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
537227 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537224 +++$+++ 537224 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.153073700E09 +++$+++ Nah, it looks like he's back (probably editing via an open proxy). As long as he does nothing wrong... -- +++$+++ :Nah, it looks like he's back (probably editing via an open proxy). As long as he does nothing wrong... --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 11:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

275081 +++$+++ ThaddeusB +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-27 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.251399660E09 +++$+++ Have a nice day,  +++$+++ Have a nice day, [[User:ThaddeusB|ThaddeusB]] ([[User talk:ThaddeusB|talk]]) 12:01, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
275082 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275081 +++$+++ 275081 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.251400860E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but I never delete an article without first checking the article's history and the talk page. Just because you declined it doesn't mean that I'm obliged to yield to your opinion. I think the A7 tagging was appropriate. I didn't delete it under G11. That was automatically in the log line due to the tagging and I inadvertently didn't overwrite it. My rationale was A7 and repost. If you want to rewrite the article and think you can do so appropriately, I think you should do so in your userspace. However, unless it clearly meets inclusion guidelines I will take it to AFD when you've finished. I also did some research and I disagree that \"appearing on CNBC, being a published author\" is sufficient for a claim of notability. We're talking bout someone who self-publishes and from what I can see from Google, spends an awful lot of time on websites like IMDb, blogs, etc, and now Wikipedia, trying to promote themselves and that's all that article was IMO. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Thanks, but I never delete an article without first checking the article's history and the talk page. Just because you declined it doesn't mean that I'm obliged to yield to your opinion. I think the A7 tagging was appropriate. I didn't delete it under G11. That was automatically in the log line due to the tagging and I inadvertently didn't overwrite it. My rationale was A7 and repost. If you want to rewrite the article and think you can do so appropriately, I think you should do so in your userspace. However, unless it clearly meets inclusion guidelines I will take it to AFD when you've finished. I also did some research and I disagree that "appearing on CNBC, being a published author" is sufficient for a claim of notability. We're talking bout someone who self-publishes and from what I can see from Google, spends an awful lot of time on websites like IMDb, blogs, etc, and now Wikipedia, trying to promote themselves and that's all that article was IMO. Thanks, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
275083 +++$+++ ThaddeusB +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275081 +++$+++ 275082 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.251408720E09 +++$+++ I could buy a repost perhaps, but A7 doesn't mean \"not notable\" it means \"no claim of importance at all.\"  Whether the subject is notable or not is irrelevant. I couldn't care less about the subject of the article, but I don't think it should have been deleted under A7. That is all I was trying to say. And by the way, while not an obligation it is common courtesy not to override another admins decision without very good reason to do so.-- +++$+++ ::I could buy a repost perhaps, but A7 doesn't mean "not notable" it means "no claim of importance at all."  Whether the subject is notable or not is irrelevant. I couldn't care less about the subject of the article, but I don't think it should have been deleted under A7. That is all I was trying to say. And by the way, while not an obligation it is common courtesy not to override another admins decision without very good reason to do so.--[[User:ThaddeusB|ThaddeusB]] ([[User talk:ThaddeusB|talk]]) 14:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

12939 +++$+++ InfernoXV +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12939 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-28 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.180403100E09 +++$+++ Wee question about only bishops being able to perform cheirotonia - I recall an Archimadrite is permitted to tonsure one of his subjects to Reader\/Chanter.  +++$+++ Wee question about only bishops being able to perform cheirotonia - I recall an Archimadrite is permitted to tonsure one of his subjects to Reader/Chanter. [[User:InfernoXV|InfernoXV]] 18:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
12940 +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12939 +++$+++ 12939 +++$+++ 2007-05-28 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.180411680E09 +++$+++ As I was taught, the term \"cheirotonia\" is used only to describe the ordination of deacons, priests and bishops. Readers and subdeacons are ordained but do not receive cierotonia. Archimandrites may, with the bishop's permission, ordain to these lower ranks, but may not perform the Mystery of Cheirotonia, which is reserved exclusively to bishops. Protopresbyter Michael Pomazansky, in his ''Orthodox Dogmatic Theology'' (Saint Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, Platina, CA, 1984) says, \"Distinct from the Mystery of Cheirotonia is ordination by prayer to the lower ranks of the clergy (reader, subdeacon); this is called cheirotesia (from a Greek word that has a purely Christian ecclesiastical meaning and came into use relatively late).\"  +++$+++ :As I was taught, the term "cheirotonia" is used only to describe the ordination of deacons, priests and bishops. Readers and subdeacons are ordained but do not receive cierotonia. Archimandrites may, with the bishop's permission, ordain to these lower ranks, but may not perform the Mystery of Cheirotonia, which is reserved exclusively to bishops. Protopresbyter Michael Pomazansky, in his ''Orthodox Dogmatic Theology'' (Saint Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, Platina, CA, 1984) says, "Distinct from the Mystery of Cheirotonia is ordination by prayer to the lower ranks of the clergy (reader, subdeacon); this is called cheirotesia (from a Greek word that has a purely Christian ecclesiastical meaning and came into use relatively late)." [[User:MishaPan|MishaPan]] 21:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
12941 +++$+++ InfernoXV +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12939 +++$+++ 12940 +++$+++ 2007-06-01 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.180713540E09 +++$+++ Ah, yes! you're right. I'd confused myself there. There is, on the other hand, evidence that in the West, at various points, sometimes Abbots who were not bishops did perform priestly ordination, which is quite shocking.  +++$+++ ::Ah, yes! you're right. I'd confused myself there. There is, on the other hand, evidence that in the West, at various points, sometimes Abbots who were not bishops did perform priestly ordination, which is quite shocking. [[User:InfernoXV|InfernoXV]] 08:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

275084 +++$+++ D climacus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-28 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.251467880E09 +++$+++ If you find another user's userpage that has something to correct, in part or in its entirety, it is considered polite to raise your concerns on the user's talk page before taking any action. This will allow the user to Fix the problem on their own. Thank you. ---- +++$+++ If you find another user's userpage that has something to correct, in part or in its entirety, it is considered polite to raise your concerns on the user's talk page before taking any action. This will allow the user to Fix the problem on their own. Thank you. ----[[User:D climacus|<span style='font-family: "Engravers MT"; color:#blue'>David</span>''']] - ''(Wikipedia Vandal Fighter)''. 06:58, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
275085 +++$+++ D climacus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275084 +++$+++ 275084 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.251501240E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your comments regarding this. I learn something new every day on here. Sorry for any inconvenience that I have cause you. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for your comments regarding this. I learn something new every day on here. Sorry for any inconvenience that I have cause you. --[[User:D climacus|<span style='font-family: "Engravers MT"; color:#blue'>David</span>''']] - ''(Wikipedia Vandal Fighter)''. 16:14, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
275086 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275084 +++$+++ 275084 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.252433880E09 +++$+++ Surprise, surprise. I usually hear from Eddie in some way after his socks have been blocked, so why break with tradition? Thanks for letting us know, Eddie, at least that's one of your IPs that's now blocked and at least when you try to appeal next we'll be able to point to at least two disruptive socks used recently.  +++$+++ :Surprise, surprise. I usually hear from Eddie in some way after his socks have been blocked, so why break with tradition? Thanks for letting us know, Eddie, at least that's one of your IPs that's now blocked and at least when you try to appeal next we'll be able to point to at least two disruptive socks used recently. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275087 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275084 +++$+++ 275086 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.252434360E09 +++$+++ Wow Eddie - I always try to give everyone a chance or two and as you know, I did with you today already a couple of times, but really you are being very immature with this sort of behaviour.  You now prove you are Eddie by this sort of silliness.  How extraordinarily sad.  If you spent only half of the time you waste here doing something worthwhile (here or elsewhere) you could probably make something of yourself.  But now you are just an extraordinarily sad example of human potential.-- +++$+++ ::Wow Eddie - I always try to give everyone a chance or two and as you know, I did with you today already a couple of times, but really you are being very immature with this sort of behaviour.  You now prove you are Eddie by this sort of silliness.  How extraordinarily sad.  If you spent only half of the time you waste here doing something worthwhile (here or elsewhere) you could probably make something of yourself.  But now you are just an extraordinarily sad example of human potential.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VirtualSteve</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|need admin support?]]</sup> 11:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

351682 +++$+++ Mono +++$+++ Moriori +++$+++ 351682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-21 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.300698300E09 +++$+++ Moriori, it is inappropriate, no matter how upset you are, to threaten a user with a block based on a content dispute. Please seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] instead.  +++$+++ Moriori, it is inappropriate, no matter how upset you are, to threaten a user with a block based on a content dispute. Please seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] instead. [[User:Mono|the'''MONO''']] 02:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
351683 +++$+++ Moriori +++$+++ Moriori +++$+++ 351682 +++$+++ 351682 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.302540060E09 +++$+++ Let's look at reality. I had been watching an article after removing a copyvio image (my first edit of the article). A little later I intervened  when an editor reverted a '''verifiable''' edit by an IP. I checked both edits and restored the IP's which was '''verified''' by an authoritative website. The editor removed that  information again, giving an inaccurate edit summary. I restored the IP's info, summarising ''\"Restore valid information\"''. As the editor had removed '''verified''' information and had been told twice it was valid, I gave a block-for-disruption warning as a preventive measure. It worked and the '''verifiable''' info posted by the IP remains. Hopefully Mono will take his own advice and read [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] which starts with ''\"This policy describes what to do when '''you''' have a dispute with another editor\"''. I didn't have a dispute; the editor initiated a dispute with the IP and I saw he was out of line so intervened.  +++$+++ :Let's look at reality. I had been watching an article after removing a copyvio image (my first edit of the article). A little later I intervened  when an editor reverted a '''verifiable''' edit by an IP. I checked both edits and restored the IP's which was '''verified''' by an authoritative website. The editor removed that  information again, giving an inaccurate edit summary. I restored the IP's info, summarising ''"Restore valid information"''. As the editor had removed '''verified''' information and had been told twice it was valid, I gave a block-for-disruption warning as a preventive measure. It worked and the '''verifiable''' info posted by the IP remains. Hopefully Mono will take his own advice and read [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] which starts with ''"This policy describes what to do when '''you''' have a dispute with another editor"''. I didn't have a dispute; the editor initiated a dispute with the IP and I saw he was out of line so intervened. [[User:Moriori|Moriori]] ([[User talk:Moriori#top|talk]]) 09:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

12942 +++$+++ Csernica +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-17 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.182089520E09 +++$+++ Are you sure that image is a Horologion? It has stichera on one page and a set of katavasia on the other; I'd expect it to be more like a menaion of some kind. '' +++$+++ Are you sure that image is a Horologion? It has stichera on one page and a set of katavasia on the other; I'd expect it to be more like a menaion of some kind. ''[[User:Csernica|TCC]]'' <small>[[User_talk:Csernica|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Csernica|(contribs)]]</small> 07:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
12943 +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12942 +++$+++ 12942 +++$+++ 2007-06-17 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.182089880E09 +++$+++ Uh, actualy...no. I'm not sure. I'm just going by the title of the image: \"Horologe1.jpg\" The image is from Wikimedia Commons, and I'm trusting that the one who posted it used a filename that matches the item pictured. Sorry.  +++$+++ :Uh, actualy...no. I'm not sure. I'm just going by the title of the image: "Horologe1.jpg" The image is from Wikimedia Commons, and I'm trusting that the one who posted it used a filename that matches the item pictured. Sorry. [[User:MishaPan|MishaPan]] 07:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
12944 +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12942 +++$+++ 12942 +++$+++ 2007-06-17 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.182090180E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, the photo is not in focus. I can barely make out on the right-hand page that it has (I think) katabasiae for the Nativity of the Lord, but I can't make out what's on the left-hand page.  +++$+++ :Unfortunately, the photo is not in focus. I can barely make out on the right-hand page that it has (I think) katabasiae for the Nativity of the Lord, but I can't make out what's on the left-hand page. [[User:MishaPan|MishaPan]] 07:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
12945 +++$+++ Csernica +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12942 +++$+++ 12944 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.182152400E09 +++$+++ Yes, the right-side page does seem to be titled for the Nativity. I can't make out the text on the left either, but the rubrics look like \"Pe [On] 8\", \"Pe 6\", \"Pe 4\", followed by \"M\u0103rire- Si acum-\" [Glory... Both now...; the 2 other stichera from the menaion is assumed, I guess] just as you'd see in a Menaion or Octoechos for a set of stichera. This must be a Festal Menaion or something similar. '' +++$+++ ::Yes, the right-side page does seem to be titled for the Nativity. I can't make out the text on the left either, but the rubrics look like "Pe [On] 8", "Pe 6", "Pe 4", followed by "Mărire- Si acum-" [Glory... Both now...; the 2 other stichera from the menaion is assumed, I guess] just as you'd see in a Menaion or Octoechos for a set of stichera. This must be a Festal Menaion or something similar. ''[[User:Csernica|TCC]]'' <small>[[User_talk:Csernica|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Csernica|(contribs)]]</small> 00:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
12946 +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12942 +++$+++ 12942 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.182152940E09 +++$+++ Just shooting in the dark here, but if ''Pe'' mean \"On\" in Romanian (rather than \"Tone\", as I had presumed), would it be reasonable to assume that the text on the left is verses from the Praises or \"Lord, I have cried\"? I've got no axe to grind here, and if it seems that the image is not in fact an Horologion I will be happy to remove it. Whatever you think.  +++$+++ :Just shooting in the dark here, but if ''Pe'' mean "On" in Romanian (rather than "Tone", as I had presumed), would it be reasonable to assume that the text on the left is verses from the Praises or "Lord, I have cried"? I've got no axe to grind here, and if it seems that the image is not in fact an Horologion I will be happy to remove it. Whatever you think. [[User:MishaPan|MishaPan]] 00:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
12947 +++$+++ Csernica +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12942 +++$+++ 12946 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.182153360E09 +++$+++ I'm not familiar with how Romanians might organize their books, to the extent it's different from how the Russians do it. Since the katavasia usually anticipate upcoming feasts, it's possible that we seem them here inserted at a convenient point prior to the actual Nativity celebration for use beforehand, and that the stichera on the left side are the verses on the Praises for some day before the Nativity. But that's just a guess. '' +++$+++ ::I'm not familiar with how Romanians might organize their books, to the extent it's different from how the Russians do it. Since the katavasia usually anticipate upcoming feasts, it's possible that we seem them here inserted at a convenient point prior to the actual Nativity celebration for use beforehand, and that the stichera on the left side are the verses on the Praises for some day before the Nativity. But that's just a guess. ''[[User:Csernica|TCC]]'' <small>[[User_talk:Csernica|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Csernica|(contribs)]]</small> 00:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

275088 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275088 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-07 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.252347360E09 +++$+++ Cheers for blocking the sock spammer on the Albury article, I've missed a lot today as I've just came back from a hospital visit (May be on and offline during the week as a family member is sick).  +++$+++ Cheers for blocking the sock spammer on the Albury article, I've missed a lot today as I've just came back from a hospital visit (May be on and offline during the week as a family member is sick). [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 11:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
275089 +++$+++ D climacus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275088 +++$+++ 275088 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.252386000E09 +++$+++ [[User:Bidgee]]. Please don\u2019t start rumors about me. This was the first time I talked to you on here, Thanks-- +++$+++ :[[User:Bidgee]]. Please don’t start rumors about me. This was the first time I talked to you on here, Thanks--[[User:D climacus|<span style='font-family: "Engravers MT"; color:#blue'>David</span>''']] '''|''' [[User_talk:D climacus|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:blue">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 22:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
275090 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275088 +++$+++ 275089 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.252391040E09 +++$+++ Huh? What a load of rubbish[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Bidgee&diff=next&oldid=312163037][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:D_climacus&diff=next&oldid=312152488]. Next time you tell a load of lies about being the first time talking to me, get your facts straight. I've given you a chance but you blew it.  +++$+++ ::Huh? What a load of rubbish[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bidgee&diff=next&oldid=312163037][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:D_climacus&diff=next&oldid=312152488]. Next time you tell a load of lies about being the first time talking to me, get your facts straight. I've given you a chance but you blew it. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 23:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

537233 +++$+++ Matia.gr +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-17 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.153153680E09 +++$+++ My congratulations for your adminship :) If I knew it, I would have supported it :) <small>[[User talk:Matia.gr|talk to]]<\/small>  +++$+++ My congratulations for your adminship :) If I knew it, I would have supported it :) <small>[[User talk:Matia.gr|talk to]]</small> [[User:Matia.gr|+MATIA]] 09:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
537234 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537233 +++$+++ 537233 +++$+++ 2006-07-17 11:13:00 +++$+++ 1.153159980E09 +++$+++ Thanks Matia, I had no doubts of that :-)-- +++$+++ :Thanks Matia, I had no doubts of that :-)--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 11:13, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

275091 +++$+++ D climacus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-08 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.252393440E09 +++$+++ '''I'm Sorry for the comments on your talk page. I hope you forgive me for my immaturity. It wont happen agene. I hope you will understand.'''-- +++$+++ '''I'm Sorry for the comments on your talk page. I hope you forgive me for my immaturity. It wont happen agene. I hope you will understand.'''--[[User:D climacus|<span style='font-family: "Engravers MT"; color:#blue'>David</span>''']] '''|''' [[User_talk:D climacus|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:blue">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 00:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275092 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.252398540E09 +++$+++ David, no one is starting rumours about you, though you are doing a good job of starting rumours about yourself. I would still like to know about your past history on this site as it's quite apparent this is not your first account. Most genuinely new users with only a couple of weeks here do not start lecturing and reprimanding admins and experienced editors. Now in this incident, we have you, with less than a month's experience and 1,000 edits, nearly all automated, who has managed to get into several disputes already and has already been stripped of rollback for misuse, and on the other side, Bidgee, a user with more than 20,000 edits, more than 2500 images, 51 new articles and four years experience on this project. Please. Stop causing problems with other editors because I can guarantee you that you will be the one who comes off second best. I told you that I thought you were a sock and who of and your response was to immediately archive my comment without response - that's not the response of an innocent person. If you continue starting confrontations and causing problems with other editors and admins who are making good faith edits, I will start an SPI report about you. Having just now looked at your edits on Steve's talk page, I will just add that its beyond obvious to me that you are Eddie Segoura avoiding your community ban, again.  +++$+++ :David, no one is starting rumours about you, though you are doing a good job of starting rumours about yourself. I would still like to know about your past history on this site as it's quite apparent this is not your first account. Most genuinely new users with only a couple of weeks here do not start lecturing and reprimanding admins and experienced editors. Now in this incident, we have you, with less than a month's experience and 1,000 edits, nearly all automated, who has managed to get into several disputes already and has already been stripped of rollback for misuse, and on the other side, Bidgee, a user with more than 20,000 edits, more than 2500 images, 51 new articles and four years experience on this project. Please. Stop causing problems with other editors because I can guarantee you that you will be the one who comes off second best. I told you that I thought you were a sock and who of and your response was to immediately archive my comment without response - that's not the response of an innocent person. If you continue starting confrontations and causing problems with other editors and admins who are making good faith edits, I will start an SPI report about you. Having just now looked at your edits on Steve's talk page, I will just add that its beyond obvious to me that you are Eddie Segoura avoiding your community ban, again. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:29, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275093 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.252399320E09 +++$+++ Your information also noted by me Sarah.  Thank you.-- +++$+++ *Your information also noted by me Sarah.  Thank you.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VirtualSteve</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|need admin support?]]</sup> 01:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275094 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ 275093 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.252417140E09 +++$+++ Hi Steve. I'm beyond certain that it's Eddie. I don't even have a slight doubt now that I've looked at his edits in the last day or two. I don't want to say too much on-site as it will just educate him. I'm going to go ahead and block him if there's even a hint of any further problems with other users or wasting other people's time for his own entertainment. There's not really any point in a checkuser as he's been doing this for four years now and he's learned all the tricks to get around the CU but the behavioural evidence is usually very compelling and it is very much so with this account. I think I might start collecting diffs (privately, off-site) so that I have them ready in the event that we decide to block the account.  +++$+++ ::Hi Steve. I'm beyond certain that it's Eddie. I don't even have a slight doubt now that I've looked at his edits in the last day or two. I don't want to say too much on-site as it will just educate him. I'm going to go ahead and block him if there's even a hint of any further problems with other users or wasting other people's time for his own entertainment. There's not really any point in a checkuser as he's been doing this for four years now and he's learned all the tricks to get around the CU but the behavioural evidence is usually very compelling and it is very much so with this account. I think I might start collecting diffs (privately, off-site) so that I have them ready in the event that we decide to block the account. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275095 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ 275094 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 08:16:00 +++$+++ 1.252422960E09 +++$+++ Understood - please feel free to talk off-site as required. If you need support just call out.-- +++$+++ :::Understood - please feel free to talk off-site as required. If you need support just call out.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VirtualSteve</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|need admin support?]]</sup> 08:16, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275096 +++$+++ D climacus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ 275095 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 08:50:00 +++$+++ 1.252425000E09 +++$+++ Sarah... After, I Seen your Comment Above. I went out of my way to try to get my name cleared from you thinking that I'm Eddie Segoura. '''Please understand that I'm not Eddie Segoura'''. I made a Sockpuppet investigation on myself ([[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations\/D climacus]]) and post [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=312548848 This] on the [[Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents]]. and .. Yes, I told everyone that I was sorry. thanks -- +++$+++ ::::Sarah... After, I Seen your Comment Above. I went out of my way to try to get my name cleared from you thinking that I'm Eddie Segoura. '''Please understand that I'm not Eddie Segoura'''. I made a Sockpuppet investigation on myself ([[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/D climacus]]) and post [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=312548848 This] on the [[Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]. and .. Yes, I told everyone that I was sorry. thanks --[[User:D climacus|<span style='font-family: "Engravers MT"; color:#blue'>David</span>''']] '''|''' [[User_talk:D climacus|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:blue">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 08:50, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275097 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ 275096 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.252425240E09 +++$+++ Sorry Eddie but it's so obvious that you're not going to be able to talk yourself out of it. Even your message here, screams \"I'm Eddie\" - your language, writing style, etc. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice...I've wasted way too much of my very valuable and sparse time trying to help you in the past only to have you turn around and pull some crappy stunt and it's not going to be happening any more. I've already started collecting evidence and the behavioural evidence is really compelling on its own without needing Checkuser. Any more games and crap and you will be blocked immediately.  +++$+++ :::::Sorry Eddie but it's so obvious that you're not going to be able to talk yourself out of it. Even your message here, screams "I'm Eddie" - your language, writing style, etc. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice...I've wasted way too much of my very valuable and sparse time trying to help you in the past only to have you turn around and pull some crappy stunt and it's not going to be happening any more. I've already started collecting evidence and the behavioural evidence is really compelling on its own without needing Checkuser. Any more games and crap and you will be blocked immediately. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 08:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275098 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ 275096 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.252425360E09 +++$+++ [EC] Your SPI report did not yield any results David\/Eddie - as detailed at the link you provided.-- +++$+++ :::::[EC] Your SPI report did not yield any results David/Eddie - as detailed at the link you provided.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VirtualSteve</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|need admin support?]]</sup> 08:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275099 +++$+++ 71.105.197.24 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ 275098 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.252425600E09 +++$+++ This is my IP Address.--[[Special:Contributions\/71.105.197.24|71.105.197.24]] ( +++$+++ ::::::This is my IP Address.--[[Special:Contributions/71.105.197.24|71.105.197.24]] ([[User talk:71.105.197.24|talk]]) 09:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275100 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ 275099 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.252426260E09 +++$+++ I don't care what your IP address is. You've boasted about having access to hundreds of IPs and you've been here long enough to learn how CU works. As I've said several times, the CU who checked your NYDreams account told me that you'd learned to cover your tracks very well. IP evidence is useless with you, Eddie, and a complete red-herring. As with the NYDreams account and many others, we can only go by behaviour evidence but thankfully your behaviour and your writing skills are very unique and very easy to spot.  +++$+++ :::::::I don't care what your IP address is. You've boasted about having access to hundreds of IPs and you've been here long enough to learn how CU works. As I've said several times, the CU who checked your NYDreams account told me that you'd learned to cover your tracks very well. IP evidence is useless with you, Eddie, and a complete red-herring. As with the NYDreams account and many others, we can only go by behaviour evidence but thankfully your behaviour and your writing skills are very unique and very easy to spot. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275101 +++$+++ D climacus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 09:14:00 +++$+++ 1.252426440E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I'm not Eddie Segoura-- +++$+++ :::::::::Sorry, I'm not Eddie Segoura--[[User:D climacus|<span style='font-family: "Engravers MT"; color:#blue'>David</span>''']] '''|''' [[User_talk:D climacus|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:blue">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 09:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275102 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.252429080E09 +++$+++ Um, right. Sorry Ed but you're never going to convince me of that. I remember when you were pretending to be an Australian actor and you wanted me to call you on the phone so you could convince me, a born and bred Australian, that you, a born and bred New Yorker, were an Australian actor. You're certainly very bold with your lies and games, but your editing and behaviour is way too transparent and you'll never convince me that you're not Ed, so you may as well give it up. The cat's well and truly out of the bag.  +++$+++ ::::::::::Um, right. Sorry Ed but you're never going to convince me of that. I remember when you were pretending to be an Australian actor and you wanted me to call you on the phone so you could convince me, a born and bred Australian, that you, a born and bred New Yorker, were an Australian actor. You're certainly very bold with your lies and games, but your editing and behaviour is way too transparent and you'll never convince me that you're not Ed, so you may as well give it up. The cat's well and truly out of the bag. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:58, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275103 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275091 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.252431900E09 +++$+++ Just amazing what a little issue can do! Ed, you have yourself to blame, no one else is to blame for something that you did. In the past hour I've been amazed how this has gone from the incident with Sarah and myself to show clear signs of being a past banned sock which has also been supported by other Admin's.  +++$+++ :::::::::::Just amazing what a little issue can do! Ed, you have yourself to blame, no one else is to blame for something that you did. In the past hour I've been amazed how this has gone from the incident with Sarah and myself to show clear signs of being a past banned sock which has also been supported by other Admin's. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 10:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

537236 +++$+++ Bridesmill +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-18 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.153256280E09 +++$+++ Is it really? I thought I recognized the style... +++$+++ Is it really? I thought I recognized the style...[[User:Bridesmill|Bridesmill]] 13:58, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
537237 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537236 +++$+++ 537236 +++$+++ 2006-07-18 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.153260540E09 +++$+++ There are very little doubts IMO.-- +++$+++ :There are very little doubts IMO.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 15:09, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

439065 +++$+++ ExplorerCDT +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439065 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-27 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.169936700E09 +++$+++ I don't think [[Turdus migratorius]] is a good example.  The biological editors and various WikiProjects are in debate back and forth over whether articles should be by common name or scientific name (binomial nomenclature), and the results on Wikipedia are appalling.  Thanks for chiming in though. &mdash; +++$+++ I don't think [[Turdus migratorius]] is a good example.  The biological editors and various WikiProjects are in debate back and forth over whether articles should be by common name or scientific name (binomial nomenclature), and the results on Wikipedia are appalling.  Thanks for chiming in though. &mdash;[[User:ExplorerCDT|ExplorerCDT]] 14:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
439066 +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439065 +++$+++ 439065 +++$+++ 2007-01-27 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.169941140E09 +++$+++ Phooey. I think it should be under the common name. I didn't realize that wasn't consensus any more. '''Perhaps''' the times are a changin' and perhaps we're moving toward more formality in article naming. Oh, well. It ''really'' doesn't matter much, the issue of what should be the real article and what should be the redirect is more Zen than of any practical importance to any real user of Wikipedia.  +++$+++ *Phooey. I think it should be under the common name. I didn't realize that wasn't consensus any more. '''Perhaps''' the times are a changin' and perhaps we're moving toward more formality in article naming. Oh, well. It ''really'' doesn't matter much, the issue of what should be the real article and what should be the redirect is more Zen than of any practical importance to any real user of Wikipedia. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] [[User_talk:dpbsmith|(talk)]] 15:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
439067 +++$+++ ExplorerCDT +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439065 +++$+++ 439066 +++$+++ 2007-01-27 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.169948640E09 +++$+++ I've always thought that incorrect common names should take a back seat to correct official long-form names.  [[Nobel Prize in Economics]] being one that I've argued over and lost, but I keep going through articles and changing the mention of the prize to the long form. Since Rutgers University isn't entirely incorrect, previously, I agreed with short-form.&mdash; +++$+++ ** I've always thought that incorrect common names should take a back seat to correct official long-form names.  [[Nobel Prize in Economics]] being one that I've argued over and lost, but I keep going through articles and changing the mention of the prize to the long form. Since Rutgers University isn't entirely incorrect, previously, I agreed with short-form.&mdash;[[User:ExplorerCDT|ExplorerCDT]] 17:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

613828 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-31 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.249095000E09 +++$+++ Is there a list somewhere of all Darwin's works? I noticed that ''[[Fertilisation of Orchids]]'' does not seem to be referenced in other articles, not even under [[Charles Darwin]].  Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ Is there a list somewhere of all Darwin's works? I noticed that ''[[Fertilisation of Orchids]]'' does not seem to be referenced in other articles, not even under [[Charles Darwin]].  Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 19:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
613829 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613828 +++$+++ 613828 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.249095300E09 +++$+++ See [[Charles Darwin#Descent of Man, sexual selection, and botany]] and the template at the bottom of all these pages, which includes a list of the books that have articles, as well as a link to [[List of works by Charles Darwin]] which includes his main works. For others see Darwin Online, linked from that page. Many thanks for your support in this,  +++$+++ :See [[Charles Darwin#Descent of Man, sexual selection, and botany]] and the template at the bottom of all these pages, which includes a list of the books that have articles, as well as a link to [[List of works by Charles Darwin]] which includes his main works. For others see Darwin Online, linked from that page. Many thanks for your support in this, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
613830 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613828 +++$+++ 613829 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.249098360E09 +++$+++ I was looking for a citation of the article, so I could copy it and add to related topics on evolution where Darwin's contributions seem to be neglected. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ ::I was looking for a citation of the article, so I could copy it and add to related topics on evolution where Darwin's contributions seem to be neglected. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
613831 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613828 +++$+++ 613830 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.249100880E09 +++$+++ Thanks, it seems to be a neglected area. Was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Coevolution&diff=305343202&oldid=292556573 this] the sort of thing you were thinking of? . . .  +++$+++ :::Thanks, it seems to be a neglected area. Was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coevolution&diff=305343202&oldid=292556573 this] the sort of thing you were thinking of? . . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
613832 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613828 +++$+++ 613828 +++$+++ 2009-08-03 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.249325880E09 +++$+++ Have just read over the Cl\xe9mence Royer article, and it looks really great. Very informative, and your simple French is evidently much better than the little I know of the language! Perhaps some of the related wikiprojects might have editors with more knowledge of the other fields, as well as the women's issues aspect. There are a couple of minor changes I'd try out, so will edit them in fairly soon. One question, in \"Darwin had been approached by the Frenchman Pierre Talandier but he had been unable to find a publisher to handle the book\", does \"he\" mean Talandier or Darwin? As I recall, it was usually the translator who found the publisher at that time. Thanks for your praise of ''Orchids'', congrats seem a bit premature as it's still [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Fertilisation of Orchids\/archive1|at FAC]] but looking hopeful. . .  +++$+++ :Have just read over the Clémence Royer article, and it looks really great. Very informative, and your simple French is evidently much better than the little I know of the language! Perhaps some of the related wikiprojects might have editors with more knowledge of the other fields, as well as the women's issues aspect. There are a couple of minor changes I'd try out, so will edit them in fairly soon. One question, in "Darwin had been approached by the Frenchman Pierre Talandier but he had been unable to find a publisher to handle the book", does "he" mean Talandier or Darwin? As I recall, it was usually the translator who found the publisher at that time. Thanks for your praise of ''Orchids'', congrats seem a bit premature as it's still [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fertilisation of Orchids/archive1|at FAC]] but looking hopeful. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 11:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
613833 +++$+++ Aa77zz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613828 +++$+++ 613832 +++$+++ 2009-08-03 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.249339320E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for taking a look. In my poor sentence, \"he\" refers to Pierre Talandier and not to Darwin. +++$+++ ::Many thanks for taking a look. In my poor sentence, "he" refers to Pierre Talandier and not to Darwin.[[User:Aa77zz|Aa77zz]] ([[User talk:Aa77zz|talk]]) 15:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

12954 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12954 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-20 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.184967000E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] 14:30, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
12955 +++$+++ Amandajm +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12954 +++$+++ 12954 +++$+++ 2007-07-20 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.184968740E09 +++$+++ Thankyou for the tip. I'll check out what he has been doing. -- +++$+++ :Thankyou for the tip. I'll check out what he has been doing. --[[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] 14:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

537244 +++$+++ f-m-t +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-21 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.153541520E09 +++$+++ Per request, regards. I'll be watching it. Perhaps apply for mediation? -  +++$+++ Per request, regards. I'll be watching it. Perhaps apply for mediation? - [[User:f-m-t|FrancisTyers]] [[User_talk:f-m-t|·]] 21:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
537245 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537244 +++$+++ 537244 +++$+++ 2006-07-23 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.153640040E09 +++$+++ Now what republic would that ^---^ be? Ha ha. Thanks Al, for the note. I responded accordingly. Feel free to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_Internet_slang_phrases&oldid=41663273#L LMTO]!  +++$+++ :Now what republic would that ^---^ be? Ha ha. Thanks Al, for the note. I responded accordingly. Feel free to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Internet_slang_phrases&oldid=41663273#L LMTO]! [[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">:N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>:</span>]] 00:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

12958 +++$+++ Travb +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-30 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191138660E09 +++$+++ thanks for your recent work on [[American civil religion]]. I hope this is a page you will come back to again in the future!  +++$+++ thanks for your recent work on [[American civil religion]]. I hope this is a page you will come back to again in the future! [[User:Travb|Travb]] ([[User talk:Travb|talk]]) 00:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
12959 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12958 +++$+++ 12958 +++$+++ 2007-10-16 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.192535820E09 +++$+++ Hi MishaPan! I am glad you like this photo (so dod I - it's one of my very favourite photos, which is why I originally asked Carey to share it with everyone on the Wikipedia). Sorry I have taken so long to write but I wrote to  Carey Linde who took the photo of H.H. the Dalai Lama and Bishop Tutu and he just replied today Oct. 16th saying: \"The info on this photo is that there was a conference in Vancouver in 2004 with noble peace prize winners around the Dalai Lama\u2019s theme for education the heart. I took the picture at a round table event.\" Nope that is of some interest. Best wishes,  +++$+++ :Hi MishaPan! I am glad you like this photo (so dod I - it's one of my very favourite photos, which is why I originally asked Carey to share it with everyone on the Wikipedia). Sorry I have taken so long to write but I wrote to  Carey Linde who took the photo of H.H. the Dalai Lama and Bishop Tutu and he just replied today Oct. 16th saying: "The info on this photo is that there was a conference in Vancouver in 2004 with noble peace prize winners around the Dalai Lama’s theme for education the heart. I took the picture at a round table event." Nope that is of some interest. Best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 04:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

275104 +++$+++ In continente +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-02 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.251905340E09 +++$+++ Please let me know if you're interested\/willing. It would be ''immensely'' appreciated :) Cheers, -- +++$+++ Please let me know if you're interested/willing. It would be ''immensely'' appreciated :) Cheers, --[[User:In continente|In continente]] ([[User talk:In continente|talk]]) 08:29, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
275105 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275104 +++$+++ 275104 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.251964800E09 +++$+++ Hi In continente, I'd be happy to help you with your research. Feel free to [[Special:EmailUser\/Sarah|email me]]. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi In continente, I'd be happy to help you with your research. Feel free to [[Special:EmailUser/Sarah|email me]]. Regards, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:00, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

12962 +++$+++ Majoreditor +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-11 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.197422280E09 +++$+++ Hi, MishaPan. I'm working on and article improvement drive for [[Basil of Caesarea]] and was wondering if you want to contribute. For example, the section on the Divine Liturgy of St. Basil could be expanded. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi, MishaPan. I'm working on and article improvement drive for [[Basil of Caesarea]] and was wondering if you want to contribute. For example, the section on the Divine Liturgy of St. Basil could be expanded. Cheers, [[User:Majoreditor|Majoreditor]] ([[User talk:Majoreditor|talk]]) 17:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
12963 +++$+++ Majoreditor +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12962 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-14 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.197689580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the excellent contributions. What I've read so far is wonderful. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the excellent contributions. What I've read so far is wonderful. Cheers, [[User:Majoreditor|Majoreditor]] ([[User talk:Majoreditor|talk]]) 19:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

537252 +++$+++ f-m-t +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537252 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-31 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.154388360E09 +++$+++ User:84.164.* are Asteraki in case you were wondering :) &mdash; see [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Asteraki]]. -  +++$+++ User:84.164.* are Asteraki in case you were wondering :) &mdash; see [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Asteraki]]. - [[User:f-m-t|FrancisTyers]] [[User_talk:f-m-t|·]] 16:26, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
537253 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537252 +++$+++ 537252 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.154393280E09 +++$+++ Darn, I always confound Asteraki and Kamikazi, maybe because they're so similar ;-)-- +++$+++ :Darn, I always confound Asteraki and Kamikazi, maybe because they're so similar ;-)--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 17:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
537254 +++$+++ Musical Linguist +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537252 +++$+++ 537252 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.154466780E09 +++$+++ Vidkun is quite mistaken. Aldux left a message on Jkelly's page[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Jkelly&diff=67021200&oldid=67018761] and <s>Vidkun<\/s> Yabafh vandalized it[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJkelly&diff=67027845&oldid=67021200] &mdash; his first ever edit. Aldux merely undid the vandalism.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Jkelly&diff=67028221&oldid=67027845] Why he didn't block the vandal, I can't imagine. (I have now rectified that!)  +++$+++ :Vidkun is quite mistaken. Aldux left a message on Jkelly's page[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jkelly&diff=67021200&oldid=67018761] and <s>Vidkun</s> Yabafh vandalized it[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJkelly&diff=67027845&oldid=67021200] &mdash; his first ever edit. Aldux merely undid the vandalism.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jkelly&diff=67028221&oldid=67027845] Why he didn't block the vandal, I can't imagine. (I have now rectified that!) [[User:Musical Linguist|AnnH]] [[User talk:Musical Linguist|<b><font size="3">♫</font></b>]] 14:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
537255 +++$+++ Vidkun +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537252 +++$+++ 537254 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.154468700E09 +++$+++ So, while we are in the midst of pointing out honest mistakes, you want to fix yours, up there?-- +++$+++ ::So, while we are in the midst of pointing out honest mistakes, you want to fix yours, up there?--[[User:Vidkun|Vidkun]] 14:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
537256 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537252 +++$+++ 537255 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.154471280E09 +++$+++ Vidkun, thanks for trying to keep my talk page from being abused.  It is appreciated.  Clearly you haven't met Aldux yet, so you wouldn't know that there is really no danger of vandalism from this account.   +++$+++ :::Vidkun, thanks for trying to keep my talk page from being abused.  It is appreciated.  Clearly you haven't met Aldux yet, so you wouldn't know that there is really no danger of vandalism from this account.  [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 15:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

12965 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-28 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.198895100E09 +++$+++ Hi! Could I trouble you to take a look at [[Theotokos Iverskaya]], which only has a Russian website source & see if you can work out what the article is actually about. I have raised some questions on the talk page - it may be about the Panagia Portaitissa there, but who can tell.  Thanks  +++$+++ Hi! Could I trouble you to take a look at [[Theotokos Iverskaya]], which only has a Russian website source & see if you can work out what the article is actually about. I have raised some questions on the talk page - it may be about the Panagia Portaitissa there, but who can tell.  Thanks [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 18:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
12966 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12965 +++$+++ 12965 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.198906140E09 +++$+++ Very impressive! Thanks. I do think it should be moved to the Greek name, which is the most common in English also. Perhaps just [[Portaitissa]], or [[Panagia Portaitissa]], or with Iveron?  The other would stay as a redirect of course.  What do you think?   +++$+++ :Very impressive! Thanks. I do think it should be moved to the Greek name, which is the most common in English also. Perhaps just [[Portaitissa]], or [[Panagia Portaitissa]], or with Iveron?  The other would stay as a redirect of course.  What do you think?  [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 21:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

12967 +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12967 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-28 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.198906740E09 +++$+++ I agree; but I think whatever we change it to needs to be in English, not Russian or Greek. There is a plethora of pages with Russian names which are not only cumbersome to someone who does not speak that language but also makes it impossible for anyone searching for the subject under its English name to find it. This is, after all, the ''English'' Wikipedia.  Terms such as ''Panagia'' and ''Bogoroditza'' are perfectly fine in the body of the article--and are important theologically--but it seems to me should not be used in the title, especially when a perfectly good English equivalent is found in English-language Orthodox publications.  +++$+++ I agree; but I think whatever we change it to needs to be in English, not Russian or Greek. There is a plethora of pages with Russian names which are not only cumbersome to someone who does not speak that language but also makes it impossible for anyone searching for the subject under its English name to find it. This is, after all, the ''English'' Wikipedia.  Terms such as ''Panagia'' and ''Bogoroditza'' are perfectly fine in the body of the article--and are important theologically--but it seems to me should not be used in the title, especially when a perfectly good English equivalent is found in English-language Orthodox publications. [[User:MishaPan|MishaPan]] ([[User talk:MishaPan#top|talk]]) 21:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
12968 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12967 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.198906860E09 +++$+++ What do you suggest? - let's continue at the article talk page.  +++$+++ ::What do you suggest? - let's continue at the article talk page. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 21:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

537257 +++$+++ Vidkun +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537257 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-01 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.154468700E09 +++$+++ I apologize for not checking the history, Aldux.-- +++$+++ I apologize for not checking the history, Aldux.--[[User:Vidkun|Vidkun]] 14:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
537258 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537257 +++$+++ 537257 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.154473740E09 +++$+++ Don't worry Vidkun, nothing's happened :-)-- +++$+++ :Don't worry Vidkun, nothing's happened :-)--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
537259 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537257 +++$+++ 537258 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.154473920E09 +++$+++ And thanks for correcting my error, Ann.-- +++$+++ ::And thanks for correcting my error, Ann.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

12971 +++$+++ Kitchen Knife +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-13 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.200295320E09 +++$+++ Why remove refec but not the pther slang enteries like frater, frater house, fratery? They seem even more slang like?-- +++$+++ Why remove refec but not the pther slang enteries like frater, frater house, fratery? They seem even more slang like?--[[User:Kitchen Knife|Kitchen Knife]] ([[User talk:Kitchen Knife|talk]]) 23:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
12972 +++$+++ Kitchen Knife +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12971 +++$+++ 12971 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.200364680E09 +++$+++ I only added refec because that is what the refectory(dinning room) was called when I was at polytechnic. I'll leave it myself.-- +++$+++ :I only added refec because that is what the refectory(dinning room) was called when I was at polytechnic. I'll leave it myself.--[[User:Kitchen Knife|Kitchen Knife]] ([[User talk:Kitchen Knife|talk]]) 18:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

275116 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-08 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.252432200E09 +++$+++ Sorry to be such a pain but can you take a look at [[National Australia Bank]] as an IP keeps removing the Self-published sources template. I've also address my concerns on the talk page [[Talk:National Australia Bank#3rd party source]] but the IP seems so protective with the NAB, UBank and NAB Group sources which can be sourced with 3rd partys.  +++$+++ Sorry to be such a pain but can you take a look at [[National Australia Bank]] as an IP keeps removing the Self-published sources template. I've also address my concerns on the talk page [[Talk:National Australia Bank#3rd party source]] but the IP seems so protective with the NAB, UBank and NAB Group sources which can be sourced with 3rd partys. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 10:50, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275117 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.252432560E09 +++$+++ The IP just breached the 3RR and is disruptive[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=National_Australia_Bank&diff=312567108&oldid=312566714].  +++$+++ :The IP just breached the 3RR and is disruptive[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Australia_Bank&diff=312567108&oldid=312566714]. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 10:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275118 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ 275117 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.252432980E09 +++$+++ Dealt with Bidgee.-- +++$+++ ::Dealt with Bidgee.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VirtualSteve</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|need admin support?]]</sup> 11:03, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275119 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ 275118 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.252433220E09 +++$+++ I keep ecing with Steve everywhere! I sprotected the page for 6 hours to try to force to talk about it. I just saw now that Steve has blocked him, so my protection probably isn't needed, unless he resets and comes back with a new IP.  +++$+++ :::I keep ecing with Steve everywhere! I sprotected the page for 6 hours to try to force to talk about it. I just saw now that Steve has blocked him, so my protection probably isn't needed, unless he resets and comes back with a new IP. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275120 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ 275119 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.252433460E09 +++$+++ Cheers, I'll say they will reset and come back (Really I wished everyone was given a static IP). I doubt they will listen on what I say to them on the talk page.  +++$+++ ::::Cheers, I'll say they will reset and come back (Really I wished everyone was given a static IP). I doubt they will listen on what I say to them on the talk page. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 11:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275121 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ 275119 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.252433520E09 +++$+++ [EC - my turn]Ah accidental teamwork - a force to reckon with. I was going to s\/protect also but noted that Bidgee had given him a fair warning earlier.  (Sorry I note also our similar mindset at Eddie's latest talk page).-- +++$+++ ::::[EC - my turn]Ah accidental teamwork - a force to reckon with. I was going to s/protect also but noted that Bidgee had given him a fair warning earlier.  (Sorry I note also our similar mindset at Eddie's latest talk page).--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VirtualSteve</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|need admin support?]]</sup> 11:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275122 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ 275121 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.252435920E09 +++$+++ You're my favourite person to edit conflict with, Steve, so no need for sorrys. ;) By the way, my puppy suddenly dumped her squeaky toy on my laptop right as I was clicking 'save page' on David's talk page and that's why I got a drunk looking edit summary! I swear I haven't had a drop of alcohol since we went to the restaurant in Canberra! :D  +++$+++ :::::You're my favourite person to edit conflict with, Steve, so no need for sorrys. ;) By the way, my puppy suddenly dumped her squeaky toy on my laptop right as I was clicking 'save page' on David's talk page and that's why I got a drunk looking edit summary! I swear I haven't had a drop of alcohol since we went to the restaurant in Canberra! :D [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275123 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ 275122 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.252439040E09 +++$+++ I did notice that edit summary with the spare 9 fullstop or something.  Also you are a bad girl - no alcohol since I bought you a drink last time - ridiculous - go now, pour a small glass of wine, sip, enjoy.-- +++$+++ ::::::I did notice that edit summary with the spare 9 fullstop or something.  Also you are a bad girl - no alcohol since I bought you a drink last time - ridiculous - go now, pour a small glass of wine, sip, enjoy.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VirtualSteve</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|need admin support?]]</sup> 12:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275124 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ 275123 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.252439340E09 +++$+++ Didn't notice that. Maybe we need to drag you to a Riverina winery? ;)  +++$+++ :::::::Didn't notice that. Maybe we need to drag you to a Riverina winery? ;) [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 12:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275125 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ 275124 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.252439520E09 +++$+++ Sorry can't resist this '''PS''' ... Is the squeaky toy that was dropped a little rubber sock?  If yes that would make her your SockPuppy. :) Hehe. -- +++$+++ :::::::*Sorry can't resist this '''PS''' ... Is the squeaky toy that was dropped a little rubber sock?  If yes that would make her your SockPuppy. :) Hehe. --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VirtualSteve</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|need admin support?]]</sup> 12:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275126 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ 275125 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.252439640E09 +++$+++ Bit slow there Steve! :P  +++$+++ :::::::**Bit slow there Steve! :P [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 12:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
275127 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275116 +++$+++ 275124 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.252486860E09 +++$+++ Haha, no it wasn't a squeaky sock; it's a small dumbbell shaped squeaky toy. And Bidgee, yes, some nice wine at a Riverina winery sounds ''very'' nice, especially if it includes nice company. I do like a nice wine, especially red wine, but I'm not really a big drinker.  +++$+++ ::::::::Haha, no it wasn't a squeaky sock; it's a small dumbbell shaped squeaky toy. And Bidgee, yes, some nice wine at a Riverina winery sounds ''very'' nice, especially if it includes nice company. I do like a nice wine, especially red wine, but I'm not really a big drinker. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:01, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

537263 +++$+++ f-m-t +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-01 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.154497980E09 +++$+++ Sure, if there are two sides which are just blindly reverting without any discussion on the talk page, even if they haven't violated the 3RR it would be fine to block them both for a few hours to calm down. At least get them to stop reverting while you try and calm the situation down. Of course, remember blocking is preventative rather than punative, so if you do block them, watch their talk pages, and point out that you will happily unblock them if they agree to stop reverting each other and start discussing things on the talk page. -  +++$+++ Sure, if there are two sides which are just blindly reverting without any discussion on the talk page, even if they haven't violated the 3RR it would be fine to block them both for a few hours to calm down. At least get them to stop reverting while you try and calm the situation down. Of course, remember blocking is preventative rather than punative, so if you do block them, watch their talk pages, and point out that you will happily unblock them if they agree to stop reverting each other and start discussing things on the talk page. - [[User:f-m-t|FrancisTyers]] [[User_talk:f-m-t|·]] 22:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
537264 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537263 +++$+++ 537263 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.154498520E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'll keep it in mind. Ciao-- +++$+++ :Thanks, I'll keep it in mind. Ciao--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 23:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

537266 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-04 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.154739240E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux, Could you please semi-protect [[Kos]]? Some anon keeps adding spam and I keep reverting it. Thanks. &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ Hi Aldux, Could you please semi-protect [[Kos]]? Some anon keeps adding spam and I keep reverting it. Thanks. &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 17:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
537267 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537266 +++$+++ 537266 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.154739960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Also, would you mind helping me out with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=202.69.140.19 Bonaparte]? He's trolling again? &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ :Thanks. Also, would you mind helping me out with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=202.69.140.19 Bonaparte]? He's trolling again? &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 18:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
537268 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537266 +++$+++ 537267 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.154743200E09 +++$+++ Thanks again Aldux. :D I'll make sure to let you know. &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks again Aldux. :D I'll make sure to let you know. &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 19:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

12979 +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-11 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.205298660E09 +++$+++ If I understand correctly, tou made and uploaded the image at right. I was wondering if you could tell me where this church is located? I would like to add that information to its caption in the article [[Iconostasis]]. Thank you very much.  +++$+++ If I understand correctly, tou made and uploaded the image at right. I was wondering if you could tell me where this church is located? I would like to add that information to its caption in the article [[Iconostasis]]. Thank you very much. [[User:MishaPan|MishaPan]] ([[User talk:MishaPan|talk]]) 22:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
12980 +++$+++ Ghaly +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12979 +++$+++ 12979 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.205301300E09 +++$+++ It is [[St Mary and St Mercurius Coptic Orthodox Church]] in Wales.-- +++$+++ : It is [[St Mary and St Mercurius Coptic Orthodox Church]] in Wales.--[[User:Ghaly|Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Ghaly|talk]]) 22:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

439070 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-07 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.170903480E09 +++$+++ Your explanation is very good, and I think it should be posted as an essay, which can then be conveniently linked to from relevant places.   +++$+++ Your explanation is very good, and I think it should be posted as an essay, which can then be conveniently linked to from relevant places.  [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 18:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
439071 +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439070 +++$+++ 439070 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.170926280E09 +++$+++ Thanks... is there a specific place for \"essays?\"  +++$+++ *Thanks... is there a specific place for "essays?" [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] [[User_talk:dpbsmith|(talk)]] 01:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

12983 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-15 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.205626740E09 +++$+++ This is drifting back to being a duplicate of [[Icon]].  Unfortunately no one has yet actually added much on Iconography in the primary English sense that this article is supposed to cover. The by religion sections should be called \"Iconography of ...\" rather than \"Icons in ....\".  There is actually very little on EO iconography in that sense, just a load of stuff on icons, duplicating that article, not to mention [[Russian icons]]. Some of these EO bits are now rather better than the equivalent passages in [[Icon]], and I would suggest you concentrate on merging the best stuff there. I don't know if Love Monkey is still around; it was his frankly unhelpful attitude that kept some of the stuff on non-Christian religions out of \"Icon\" & drove it here. But that is not where it belongs.  +++$+++ This is drifting back to being a duplicate of [[Icon]].  Unfortunately no one has yet actually added much on Iconography in the primary English sense that this article is supposed to cover. The by religion sections should be called "Iconography of ..." rather than "Icons in ....".  There is actually very little on EO iconography in that sense, just a load of stuff on icons, duplicating that article, not to mention [[Russian icons]]. Some of these EO bits are now rather better than the equivalent passages in [[Icon]], and I would suggest you concentrate on merging the best stuff there. I don't know if Love Monkey is still around; it was his frankly unhelpful attitude that kept some of the stuff on non-Christian religions out of "Icon" & drove it here. But that is not where it belongs. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 17:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
12984 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12983 +++$+++ 12983 +++$+++ 2008-03-15 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.205629380E09 +++$+++ I was thinking more about this, and wonder if the best thing might be to move much of the present iconography content (and maybe some of the non-EO Icon content) to a new article called ? \"Images in religious art\" , \"Religious images\" or something, then adding new stuff to iconography specifically on the first sense, with lots of links to things like [[Christ Pantocrator]], [[Life of the Virgin]] for the Christian sections, and so on. I think \"iconography\" should be about the first meaning given in the lead, with \"icon\" the main article for the second. But we need a general article about images in religious art - [[cult image]] is too specific.  Does this sound sensible?   +++$+++ :I was thinking more about this, and wonder if the best thing might be to move much of the present iconography content (and maybe some of the non-EO Icon content) to a new article called ? "Images in religious art" , "Religious images" or something, then adding new stuff to iconography specifically on the first sense, with lots of links to things like [[Christ Pantocrator]], [[Life of the Virgin]] for the Christian sections, and so on. I think "iconography" should be about the first meaning given in the lead, with "icon" the main article for the second. But we need a general article about images in religious art - [[cult image]] is too specific.  Does this sound sensible?  [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 18:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

275129 +++$+++ Aaroncrick +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275129 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-16 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.253100360E09 +++$+++ [[User talk:220.233.185.183]] is back. Might wanna block again. ''' +++$+++ [[User talk:220.233.185.183]] is back. Might wanna block again. '''[[User:Aaroncrick|<span style="font-family: Tempus Sans ITC;color: #E49B0F">Aaroncrick</span>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:Aaroncrick|<font color="#FE2712">talk</font>]]'') 04:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
275130 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275129 +++$+++ 275129 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.253102460E09 +++$+++ Bloody hell. I don't know how to get through to this guy that there's no way he can win. Reblocked and thanks for letting me know, Aaron. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Bloody hell. I don't know how to get through to this guy that there's no way he can win. Reblocked and thanks for letting me know, Aaron. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

275131 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275131 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-16 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.253115360E09 +++$+++ Clear that {{Userlinks|Jumpformylove}} is another sock of {{Userlinks|Jackp}}.  +++$+++ Clear that {{Userlinks|Jumpformylove}} is another sock of {{Userlinks|Jackp}}. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 08:36, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
275132 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275131 +++$+++ 275131 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.253123220E09 +++$+++ Jackp? Gawd, I haven't heard his name for ages. Sock blocked. Cheers Bidgee,  +++$+++ :Jackp? Gawd, I haven't heard his name for ages. Sock blocked. Cheers Bidgee, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

12988 +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-20 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.206000660E09 +++$+++ I noticed you removed an image from [[Persecution of Christians]], with the comment, \"that's related to the persecution of an ethnic minority which is different, we also have context in a case like that, we also have none here &the image is misleading terms whole article\". I was wondering if you could expain this--I'm not really an expert on Spanish history. Which ethnic minority is being persecuted in the photo? And how is the desecration of a statue of Jesus by anti-clericalists to be parsed from persecution of Christians? A lot of religious persecution has ethnic persecution at its root. Thanks for your help.  +++$+++ I noticed you removed an image from [[Persecution of Christians]], with the comment, "that's related to the persecution of an ethnic minority which is different, we also have context in a case like that, we also have none here &the image is misleading terms whole article". I was wondering if you could expain this--I'm not really an expert on Spanish history. Which ethnic minority is being persecuted in the photo? And how is the desecration of a statue of Jesus by anti-clericalists to be parsed from persecution of Christians? A lot of religious persecution has ethnic persecution at its root. Thanks for your help. [[User:MishaPan|MishaPan]] ([[User talk:MishaPan|talk]]) 01:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
12989 +++$+++ Nwe +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12988 +++$+++ 12988 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.206001860E09 +++$+++ 3. The Spanish Civil War is itself a bad illustration of persecution of Christians. It was more an attack on the institution of the Catholic Church in Spain for its political views, not on Christians for their religion so to speak. In fact there is at least one description I've heard of people burning churches and then the same people proceeding to attend religious services in its sinders a week later.  +++$+++ :3. The Spanish Civil War is itself a bad illustration of persecution of Christians. It was more an attack on the institution of the Catholic Church in Spain for its political views, not on Christians for their religion so to speak. In fact there is at least one description I've heard of people burning churches and then the same people proceeding to attend religious services in its sinders a week later. [[User:Nwe|Nwe]] ([[User talk:Nwe|talk]]) 01:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

537277 +++$+++ Zello +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537277 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-06 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.154923860E09 +++$+++ Hi, I saw that you protected the page because of Bonaparte's actions. The only problem is that with your move exactly that version was protected what Criztu and Bonaparte like to see - the one without the Hungarian name. I don't know whether you noticed that Criztu launched a campaign against Hungarian geographical names in Transylvania, and this debate was part of that campaign. I would like to kindly ask you to restore the name \"Szatm\xe1r megye\" in the lead.  +++$+++ Hi, I saw that you protected the page because of Bonaparte's actions. The only problem is that with your move exactly that version was protected what Criztu and Bonaparte like to see - the one without the Hungarian name. I don't know whether you noticed that Criztu launched a campaign against Hungarian geographical names in Transylvania, and this debate was part of that campaign. I would like to kindly ask you to restore the name "Szatmár megye" in the lead. [[User:Zello|Zello]] 21:11, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
537278 +++$+++ Criztu +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537277 +++$+++ 537277 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.154988420E09 +++$+++ I dont remove the name by which hungarians refer to an administrative division of ROmania, i remove it from the lead section and moved it to the paragraph dealing with Demographics of that administrative division, where mention of a hungarian minority  +++$+++ :I dont remove the name by which hungarians refer to an administrative division of ROmania, i remove it from the lead section and moved it to the paragraph dealing with Demographics of that administrative division, where mention of a hungarian minority [[User:Criztu|Criztu]] 15:07, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

275134 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-16 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.253161920E09 +++$+++ Hello Sarah! Just dropping by to give you your annual dual-anniversary congratulations: you've now spent four years as an editor and three years as an administrator! Hope that everything is good with you. Best.  +++$+++ Hello Sarah! Just dropping by to give you your annual dual-anniversary congratulations: you've now spent four years as an editor and three years as an administrator! Hope that everything is good with you. Best. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 21:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
275135 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275134 +++$+++ 275134 +++$+++ 2009-09-17 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.253176980E09 +++$+++ Hi Acalamari, nice to hear from you and I hope everything is going well with you and that you had a nice summer. Wow, it's kind of scary that it's been that long now. I came here originally to write an article about my cousin who was an Australian actor. This was long before the COI guideline and I wouldn't even have known anything about it even if it had existed! I had been using Wikipedia as a reference for a year or so I guess but had only made a few typo corrections and such as an IP and only read articles, not even realising this whole other world of Wikipedia existed on talk pages and project space etc. But once I had an account I quickly got sucked in and here we are four years later :) Thank you for remembering my anniversary! It's very thoughtful of you to remember. :) Take care of yourself,   +++$+++ :Hi Acalamari, nice to hear from you and I hope everything is going well with you and that you had a nice summer. Wow, it's kind of scary that it's been that long now. I came here originally to write an article about my cousin who was an Australian actor. This was long before the COI guideline and I wouldn't even have known anything about it even if it had existed! I had been using Wikipedia as a reference for a year or so I guess but had only made a few typo corrections and such as an IP and only read articles, not even realising this whole other world of Wikipedia existed on talk pages and project space etc. But once I had an account I quickly got sucked in and here we are four years later :) Thank you for remembering my anniversary! It's very thoughtful of you to remember. :) Take care of yourself,  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:43, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

12991 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-20 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.206066180E09 +++$+++ Am I right in thinking that the Orthodox view is that Mary and Joseph were not married?  If so [[Theotokos]] ought to mention this, as the Western view is that they were.  If this is correct, an authoritative reference would be much appreciated.  Thanks.  +++$+++ Am I right in thinking that the Orthodox view is that Mary and Joseph were not married?  If so [[Theotokos]] ought to mention this, as the Western view is that they were.  If this is correct, an authoritative reference would be much appreciated.  Thanks. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 19:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
12992 +++$+++ Johnbod +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12991 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-08 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.207645560E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Of course, for Catholics and most older Protestant groups she is \"ever-virgin\" also, although the marriage is not a Catholic feast. The same scene in Orthodox art seems to regarded as a guardianship ceremony, from what I gather.  +++$+++ ::Thanks! Of course, for Catholics and most older Protestant groups she is "ever-virgin" also, although the marriage is not a Catholic feast. The same scene in Orthodox art seems to regarded as a guardianship ceremony, from what I gather. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 02:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

537280 +++$+++ Ral315 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-07 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.154941920E09 +++$+++ I understand Tchadienne's many good edits, and have no issue with those.  However, sockpuppeting to evade the block is specifically against policy, and we shouldn't just ignore it by letting the block lapse.  When Tchadienne actually stops evading the block (without us having to range block his\/her entire ISP), I'll be happy to consider undoing the block.  Until then, I think a cooldown is necessary.   +++$+++ I understand Tchadienne's many good edits, and have no issue with those.  However, sockpuppeting to evade the block is specifically against policy, and we shouldn't just ignore it by letting the block lapse.  When Tchadienne actually stops evading the block (without us having to range block his/her entire ISP), I'll be happy to consider undoing the block.  Until then, I think a cooldown is necessary.  [[User:Ral315|Ral315]] ([[User talk:Ral315|talk]]) 02:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
537281 +++$+++ Ral315 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537280 +++$+++ 537280 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.154995980E09 +++$+++ Let me put it this way:  I have no problem with having Tchadienne's block removed (or reduced).  However, since I didn't place the range block personally, I'd prefer you go to JzG and advocate for the removal of the range block as well as the block on Tchadienne.  I'll put in my two cents on his talk page as well.   +++$+++ : Let me put it this way:  I have no problem with having Tchadienne's block removed (or reduced).  However, since I didn't place the range block personally, I'd prefer you go to JzG and advocate for the removal of the range block as well as the block on Tchadienne.  I'll put in my two cents on his talk page as well.  [[User:Ral315|Ral315]] ([[User talk:Ral315|talk]]) 17:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

439072 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-12 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.171277820E09 +++$+++ In case you haven't noticed, the bit about the sexuality of Abraham Lincoln being disputed hasn't been on the article for very long. And also in case you didn't notice, I was the one who put a {{tl|totallydisputed}} tag on it to try to push people to sort out the POV problems. -  +++$+++ In case you haven't noticed, the bit about the sexuality of Abraham Lincoln being disputed hasn't been on the article for very long. And also in case you didn't notice, I was the one who put a {{tl|totallydisputed}} tag on it to try to push people to sort out the POV problems. - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 02:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
439073 +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439072 +++$+++ 439072 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.171307460E09 +++$+++ Ouch. Sorry.  +++$+++ *Ouch. Sorry. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] [[User_talk:dpbsmith|(talk)]] 11:11, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

537282 +++$+++ Kingboyk +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537282 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-07 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.154986980E09 +++$+++ {{vandal|88.218.47.184}} We don't normally block an IP indefinitely. At the very least, you could \"block anon only\". No reply needed, just pointing this out. Cheers. -- +++$+++ {{vandal|88.218.47.184}} We don't normally block an IP indefinitely. At the very least, you could "block anon only". No reply needed, just pointing this out. Cheers. --[[User:Kingboyk|kingboyk]] 14:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
537283 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537282 +++$+++ 537282 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.154987340E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux, thanks again for helping out. Actually, Mywayyy (under the .47.184 IP) was just engaged in what ''might'' become a halfwayyy reasonable discussion about how to overcome this silly situation, so now you semiprotected the articles you might actually unblock the IP so we can continue there. Thanks!  +++$+++ :Hi Aldux, thanks again for helping out. Actually, Mywayyy (under the .47.184 IP) was just engaged in what ''might'' become a halfwayyy reasonable discussion about how to overcome this silly situation, so now you semiprotected the articles you might actually unblock the IP so we can continue there. Thanks! [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 14:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
537284 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537282 +++$+++ 537283 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.154987760E09 +++$+++ Apart from greek island articles, other articles have also suffered similar attacks: [[Trabzon]], [[Malatya]], [[Izmir]] (just to list some of them...). i think that semiprotection for these articles is also required... -- +++$+++ ::Apart from greek island articles, other articles have also suffered similar attacks: [[Trabzon]], [[Malatya]], [[Izmir]] (just to list some of them...). i think that semiprotection for these articles is also required... --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 14:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

275139 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275139 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-22 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.253622900E09 +++$+++ Ah, never mind that email I sent.  I decided to have some ice cream and not worry about it. =) --  +++$+++ Ah, never mind that email I sent.  I decided to have some ice cream and not worry about it. =) -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo|talk]]) 05:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
275140 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275139 +++$+++ 275139 +++$+++ 2009-09-22 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.253624280E09 +++$+++ Oh, bloody hell, I completely forgot about it. Sorry Gogo. I will have a little time this evening and can take a looksie in a couple of hours if you like?  +++$+++ :Oh, bloody hell, I completely forgot about it. Sorry Gogo. I will have a little time this evening and can take a looksie in a couple of hours if you like? [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:58, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
275141 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275139 +++$+++ 275140 +++$+++ 2009-09-23 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.253712780E09 +++$+++ No worries. =)  Like I said, I had some ice cream and decided not to worry about it.  There are more important things to think about. =) --  +++$+++ ::No worries. =)  Like I said, I had some ice cream and decided not to worry about it.  There are more important things to think about. =) -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo|talk]]) 06:33, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

12996 +++$+++ Tb +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12996 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-23 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.206270060E09 +++$+++ I agree that the different names here are doing something.  But I was thinking of maybe having each name, in English translation, and either leaving it at that, or giving a few representative languages but not a complete list, which conventionally use that term.   +++$+++ I agree that the different names here are doing something.  But I was thinking of maybe having each name, in English translation, and either leaving it at that, or giving a few representative languages but not a complete list, which conventionally use that term.  [[User:Tb|Tb]] ([[User talk:Tb|talk]]) 04:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
12997 +++$+++ Phiddipus +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12996 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-29 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.206781920E09 +++$+++ That having been said, I would specifically like to address the usage of the term \u201cHoly\u201d when referring to chronology. In English we often use the terms: Holy Week, Holy Monday, Holy Tuesday, etc. or, as a combination such as \u201cHoly and Great etc.\u201d. But correctly there is nothing \u201cHoly\u201d about the days themselves. Originally these days are called \u201cGreat\u201d to signify their high importance. Yes, I know that the Russians use the term \u201cHoly\u201d and that it has become common in English as well. Never-the-less I think we have the opportunity to correct what may ultimately lead to an error of theology. I propose referring to them as \u201cGreat\u201d and nothing more. Also, we might consider referring to \u201cLent\u201d as \u201cThe Great Fast\u201d since lent is a Germanic word meaning Spring or Long.-- +++$+++ ::That having been said, I would specifically like to address the usage of the term “Holy” when referring to chronology. In English we often use the terms: Holy Week, Holy Monday, Holy Tuesday, etc. or, as a combination such as “Holy and Great etc.”. But correctly there is nothing “Holy” about the days themselves. Originally these days are called “Great” to signify their high importance. Yes, I know that the Russians use the term “Holy” and that it has become common in English as well. Never-the-less I think we have the opportunity to correct what may ultimately lead to an error of theology. I propose referring to them as “Great” and nothing more. Also, we might consider referring to “Lent” as “The Great Fast” since lent is a Germanic word meaning Spring or Long.--[[User:Phiddipus|Phiddipus]] ([[User talk:Phiddipus|talk]]) 02:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
12998 +++$+++ Phiddipus +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 12996 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-29 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.206782520E09 +++$+++ A comment I would like to add to the end of the last part of the previous message: The word \"Lent\" which, as I said above, means spring or Long oddly enough does not mean to \"Fast\". To give an example of why the wrong word leads to theological problems, well, look at the Roman Catholics today...the do \"Lent\" which to them doesn\u2019t seem to have anything at all with fasting anymore, which they almost don't do anymore. In other words, change the meaning away from fasting and eventually people will forget to fast. This is why I prefer the term \"The Great Fast\". Of course that is traditionally what it is called, but perhaps if we added even more meaning to it we could call it \"The Great Preparation\"!-- +++$+++ ::::A comment I would like to add to the end of the last part of the previous message: The word "Lent" which, as I said above, means spring or Long oddly enough does not mean to "Fast". To give an example of why the wrong word leads to theological problems, well, look at the Roman Catholics today...the do "Lent" which to them doesn’t seem to have anything at all with fasting anymore, which they almost don't do anymore. In other words, change the meaning away from fasting and eventually people will forget to fast. This is why I prefer the term "The Great Fast". Of course that is traditionally what it is called, but perhaps if we added even more meaning to it we could call it "The Great Preparation"!--[[User:Phiddipus|Phiddipus]] ([[User talk:Phiddipus|talk]]) 02:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

537285 +++$+++ Politis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-07 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.154988120E09 +++$+++ As a follow up and for your interest, I would guess that User:88.218.47.184 is the same as {{user|88.224.7.113}}. I think that trigger-happy user might need to be familiarised with certain procedures (if only they adopted a proper username), otherwise we may find our selves runnin round every city in the east Mediterranean to rvt his\/her enthusiasm.  +++$+++ As a follow up and for your interest, I would guess that User:88.218.47.184 is the same as {{user|88.224.7.113}}. I think that trigger-happy user might need to be familiarised with certain procedures (if only they adopted a proper username), otherwise we may find our selves runnin round every city in the east Mediterranean to rvt his/her enthusiasm. [[User:Politis|Politis]] 15:02, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
537286 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537285 +++$+++ 537285 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.154988720E09 +++$+++ Hm, looks more like his mirror-image. But you're certainly right about running round every city in the east Mediterranean. Not that I would mind doing that in actual practice if WP would cover my travelling costs... :-) We should get a centralised discussion and then a final strawpoll some time, to settle this stupid thing once and for all.  +++$+++ :Hm, looks more like his mirror-image. But you're certainly right about running round every city in the east Mediterranean. Not that I would mind doing that in actual practice if WP would cover my travelling costs... :-) We should get a centralised discussion and then a final strawpoll some time, to settle this stupid thing once and for all. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 15:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
537287 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537285 +++$+++ 537286 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.154989680E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately I can't act as I would with Mywayyy's socks, as he isn't a sock and has only just started; but I'll keep an eye on the articles in question.-- +++$+++ ::Unfortunately I can't act as I would with Mywayyy's socks, as he isn't a sock and has only just started; but I'll keep an eye on the articles in question.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 15:28, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

275144 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275144 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-05 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.254782340E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I've returned as an editor but I'm going to be somewhat busy with studies, research, bike riding and resting. The protection now can be removed (Until the vandals reawaken). :)  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, I've returned as an editor but I'm going to be somewhat busy with studies, research, bike riding and resting. The protection now can be removed (Until the vandals reawaken). :) [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 15:39, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
275145 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275144 +++$+++ 275144 +++$+++ 2009-10-06 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.254813780E09 +++$+++ Hi Bidgee, no worries, have removed the talk page protection. I'm glad to know that you've returned, even if only at a reduced level. :) By the way, did you get the email I forwarded to you from someone claiming they wanted to use your pictures in a book? Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi Bidgee, no worries, have removed the talk page protection. I'm glad to know that you've returned, even if only at a reduced level. :) By the way, did you get the email I forwarded to you from someone claiming they wanted to use your pictures in a book? Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:23, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
275146 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275144 +++$+++ 275145 +++$+++ 2009-10-06 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.254814320E09 +++$+++ Cheers for that! I did and I've <s>forgotten to reply to them (Oops!). They seem legit (Did a search on the person and location). I'm going send them that email now!<\/s> sent them a reply on Thursday. Seems like my mind is in forgetful mode after the 30k ride yesterday! LOL  +++$+++ ::Cheers for that! I did and I've <s>forgotten to reply to them (Oops!). They seem legit (Did a search on the person and location). I'm going send them that email now!</s> sent them a reply on Thursday. Seems like my mind is in forgetful mode after the 30k ride yesterday! LOL [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 00:32, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
275147 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275144 +++$+++ 275146 +++$+++ 2009-10-06 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.254815880E09 +++$+++ Cool. I'm glad they checked out, I was just a little worried as it seemed odd that they contacted me instead of just writing to you directly. 30km bike ride? You'll be getting massive leg muscles with treks like that!  +++$+++ :::Cool. I'm glad they checked out, I was just a little worried as it seemed odd that they contacted me instead of just writing to you directly. 30km bike ride? You'll be getting massive leg muscles with treks like that! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
275148 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275144 +++$+++ 275147 +++$+++ 2009-10-06 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.254821760E09 +++$+++ Probably when they seen the semi-retired they may have thought that I may not be contactable on Wiki, Who knows but it doesn't matter. :) I don't do 30k rides often (maybe once to twice a month or so) but I am feeling the after affects of the ride now though!  +++$+++ ::::Probably when they seen the semi-retired they may have thought that I may not be contactable on Wiki, Who knows but it doesn't matter. :) I don't do 30k rides often (maybe once to twice a month or so) but I am feeling the after affects of the ride now though! [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 02:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

13001 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 13001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-30 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.212192720E09 +++$+++ Hello. Do you happen to know what a ''pisanie'' is called in English? In Romanian, it refers to a plaque above a church door giving a short history of the church. I gather the term comes from the Slavic for \"writing\". Here are a few examples: [http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/ro\/thumb\/d\/d8\/Pisania_bisericii_construita_de_Brancoveanu_la_Fagaras.JPG\/300px-Pisania_bisericii_construita_de_Brancoveanu_la_Fagaras.JPG], [http:\/\/www.monument.md\/i\/mon\/fresca_moldova\/19.jpg], [http:\/\/www.manastirea-cozia.go.ro\/COZIA%20imagini\/pisania.jpg].  +++$+++ Hello. Do you happen to know what a ''pisanie'' is called in English? In Romanian, it refers to a plaque above a church door giving a short history of the church. I gather the term comes from the Slavic for "writing". Here are a few examples: [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ro/thumb/d/d8/Pisania_bisericii_construita_de_Brancoveanu_la_Fagaras.JPG/300px-Pisania_bisericii_construita_de_Brancoveanu_la_Fagaras.JPG], [http://www.monument.md/i/mon/fresca_moldova/19.jpg], [http://www.manastirea-cozia.go.ro/COZIA%20imagini/pisania.jpg]. [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 17:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
13002 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 13001 +++$+++ 13001 +++$+++ 2008-05-31 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.212270600E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks a lot. My own suspicion is that the English term derives from the Greek, so I'll ask a Greek speaker for the Greek term, and maybe that will help find the technical name.  +++$+++ :OK, thanks a lot. My own suspicion is that the English term derives from the Greek, so I'll ask a Greek speaker for the Greek term, and maybe that will help find the technical name. [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 14:50, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
13003 +++$+++ El Greco +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 13001 +++$+++ 13002 +++$+++ 2008-05-31 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.212291180E09 +++$+++ The best I can come up with is plaque or \u03c0\u03b9\u03bd\u03b1\u03ba\u03af\u03b4\u03b1 in Greek. I hope that helps. <sub> +++$+++ ::The best I can come up with is plaque or πινακίδα in Greek. I hope that helps. <sub>[[User:El Greco|'''El Greco''']]</sub><sup>([[User talk:El Greco|talk]])</sup> 20:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

13004 +++$+++ Lima +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 13004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-19 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.213903860E09 +++$+++ If it is not too much trouble, I would like you to express your view.  Not many people visit the page.   +++$+++ If it is not too much trouble, I would like you to express your view.  Not many people visit the page.  [[User:Lima|Lima]] ([[User talk:Lima|talk]]) 12:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
13005 +++$+++ Padillah +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 13004 +++$+++ 13004 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.213991580E09 +++$+++ You're not trying to [[WP:CANVAS|canvas]] are you? Those entries are not quite enough to convince me you are, so forget it. However, I will let you know that I put an RfCreli on the talk page to drum up interest so we might want to step away from personally notifying other editors lest it '''look''' like canvasing.  +++$+++ :You're not trying to [[WP:CANVAS|canvas]] are you? Those entries are not quite enough to convince me you are, so forget it. However, I will let you know that I put an RfCreli on the talk page to drum up interest so we might want to step away from personally notifying other editors lest it '''look''' like canvasing. [[User:Padillah|Padillah]] ([[User talk:Padillah|talk]]) 12:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
13006 +++$+++ Lima +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 13004 +++$+++ 13005 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.213992660E09 +++$+++ No, I was not trying to canvas.  As you can see from the list you made, I began with the two editors who were already involved, one of whom (as you can see on my Talk page) was until then quite hostile to me. To get more people involved, what could I do - since I did not know of the method that you have kindly used on the article's Talk page - but get some Talk links from my Talk page, starting from the bottom (the most recent)?  If you look at what they wrote, you will see that not all of them have always been in agreement with me; but I thought that, in this matter, the more, the better.  I felt sure that scarcely anyone would support the claim of the \"owner\" of the article to control the gateway to editing it.  If one of those I contacted is the editor who has since attacked Sherurcij anonymously, I was and am quite unaware of any previous conflict between him and Sherurcij.   +++$+++ ::No, I was not trying to canvas.  As you can see from the list you made, I began with the two editors who were already involved, one of whom (as you can see on my Talk page) was until then quite hostile to me. To get more people involved, what could I do - since I did not know of the method that you have kindly used on the article's Talk page - but get some Talk links from my Talk page, starting from the bottom (the most recent)?  If you look at what they wrote, you will see that not all of them have always been in agreement with me; but I thought that, in this matter, the more, the better.  I felt sure that scarcely anyone would support the claim of the "owner" of the article to control the gateway to editing it.  If one of those I contacted is the editor who has since attacked Sherurcij anonymously, I was and am quite unaware of any previous conflict between him and Sherurcij.  [[User:Lima|Lima]] ([[User talk:Lima#top|talk]]) 13:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

275150 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-10 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.255195440E09 +++$+++ That was about 15 months ago. I'd like to review this to see if semiprotection is still necessary.  Please see the discussion I have started at [[talk:Communist Party of Pakistan]]. -- +++$+++ That was about 15 months ago. I'd like to review this to see if semiprotection is still necessary.  Please see the discussion I have started at [[talk:Communist Party of Pakistan]]. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 10:24, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
275151 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275150 +++$+++ 275150 +++$+++ 2009-10-12 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.255374240E09 +++$+++ Which address did you use? I know the secretary a wikimedia org au inbox is full but I can't work out how to get into the web interface to delete all the crap. The other address sewart at wikimedia or au should be working and sarahewart at gmail com. Either of those are fine.  +++$+++ :Which address did you use? I know the secretary a wikimedia org au inbox is full but I can't work out how to get into the web interface to delete all the crap. The other address sewart at wikimedia or au should be working and sarahewart at gmail com. Either of those are fine. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
275152 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275150 +++$+++ 275151 +++$+++ 2009-10-12 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.255374300E09 +++$+++ What type of interface (email software on the server) do you use?  +++$+++ ::What type of interface (email software on the server) do you use? [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 12:05, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
275153 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275150 +++$+++ 275152 +++$+++ 2009-10-12 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.255375380E09 +++$+++ The Wikimedia interface is called cPanel X and when you log in it presents you with three different services for reading your mail - Horde, Squirrel Mail, Round Cube, but I can't get any of them to work. I can sign into the email account on cPanel X but each of the services gives me a different type of error and I've tried on different computers so I don't know what the problem is. The mail gets sent to me as well as getting saved in the webmail inbox so it's basically filled up with spam and hundreds of copies of membership notices and I can't get into it to delete it. Andrew is moving the email addresses to IMAP so I'm hoping when he does that I'll be able to delete all the junk.  +++$+++ :::The Wikimedia interface is called cPanel X and when you log in it presents you with three different services for reading your mail - Horde, Squirrel Mail, Round Cube, but I can't get any of them to work. I can sign into the email account on cPanel X but each of the services gives me a different type of error and I've tried on different computers so I don't know what the problem is. The mail gets sent to me as well as getting saved in the webmail inbox so it's basically filled up with spam and hundreds of copies of membership notices and I can't get into it to delete it. Andrew is moving the email addresses to IMAP so I'm hoping when he does that I'll be able to delete all the junk. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
275154 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275150 +++$+++ 275153 +++$+++ 2009-10-12 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.255376160E09 +++$+++ I've had websites in the past so I've got a little bit of knowledge. Horde when you mark emails for deletion it will still keep it incase you accidentally delete an email but there is a setting some were (I'll have to see if I can install it on my home server), Squirrel Mail I've rarely used. cPanel X is good but if it hasn't been setup properly it will be a pain to use. Can you email a screenshot of the error?  +++$+++ ::::I've had websites in the past so I've got a little bit of knowledge. Horde when you mark emails for deletion it will still keep it incase you accidentally delete an email but there is a setting some were (I'll have to see if I can install it on my home server), Squirrel Mail I've rarely used. cPanel X is good but if it hasn't been setup properly it will be a pain to use. Can you email a screenshot of the error? [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 12:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

13010 +++$+++ WereSpielChequers +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 13010 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-08 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.263001620E09 +++$+++ Hi MishaPan, I just read one of your articles at newpage patrol, and was surprised to see that an editor who has contributed quite so many articles as you over such a long period hadn't already been approved as an [[wp:Autoreviewer]]. So I've taken the liberty of rectifying that. '' +++$+++ Hi MishaPan, I just read one of your articles at newpage patrol, and was surprised to see that an editor who has contributed quite so many articles as you over such a long period hadn't already been approved as an [[wp:Autoreviewer]]. So I've taken the liberty of rectifying that. ''[[User:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkGreen">Ϣere</span>]][[User talk:WereSpielChequers|<span style="color:DarkRed">Spiel</span>]]<span style="color:DarkOrange">Chequers''</span> 17:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
13011 +++$+++ Tb +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ 13010 +++$+++ 13010 +++$+++ 2010-01-29 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.264813800E09 +++$+++ The anonymous editor needs to ''fix the chart'' and not simply keep deleting it.  We certainly need an NPOV chart detailing the history of different lineages among the Christians in India, but to simply give up is a disaster.  The topic is extremely complex, and cries out for a chart.  The current chart could surely be improved, so what it needs is improvement, not delinking.   +++$+++ :The anonymous editor needs to ''fix the chart'' and not simply keep deleting it.  We certainly need an NPOV chart detailing the history of different lineages among the Christians in India, but to simply give up is a disaster.  The topic is extremely complex, and cries out for a chart.  The current chart could surely be improved, so what it needs is improvement, not delinking.  [[User:Tb|Tb]] ([[User talk:Tb|talk]]) 17:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

275155 +++$+++ Bobf +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275155 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-21 07:19:00 +++$+++ 1.256134740E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah - f.y.a. Please note the discussion on my talk page re. Puppetry. Regards  +++$+++ Hi Sarah - f.y.a. Please note the discussion on my talk page re. Puppetry. Regards [[User:Bobf|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bobf|talk]]) 07:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
275156 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275155 +++$+++ 275155 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 09:16:00 +++$+++ 1.256141760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up, Bob. I had a look but that is just another sockpuppet of the David Logan spammer. Unfortunately I have seen exactly this kind of thing from him many times in the past since since I became involved with this case a couple of years ago. There is some very, very obvious and transparent evidence in the message on your talk page that I would gladly share but am not keen to do so on-site as he will just change his habits which will maker it more difficult to idenitfy other socks in future.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up, Bob. I had a look but that is just another sockpuppet of the David Logan spammer. Unfortunately I have seen exactly this kind of thing from him many times in the past since since I became involved with this case a couple of years ago. There is some very, very obvious and transparent evidence in the message on your talk page that I would gladly share but am not keen to do so on-site as he will just change his habits which will maker it more difficult to idenitfy other socks in future. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
275157 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275155 +++$+++ 275155 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.256143260E09 +++$+++ By the way, Bob, I noticed that you don't have rollback rights so I turned it on for you. You can take a look at the [[WP:ROLLBACK]] page, but the main rule for using it is that it should only be used for vandalism and obviously unproductive edits that don't require a proper edit summary. Hope you find it useful,  +++$+++ :By the way, Bob, I noticed that you don't have rollback rights so I turned it on for you. You can take a look at the [[WP:ROLLBACK]] page, but the main rule for using it is that it should only be used for vandalism and obviously unproductive edits that don't require a proper edit summary. Hope you find it useful, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:41, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
275158 +++$+++ Bobf +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275155 +++$+++ 275157 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.256167140E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sarah - I wondered. Regards  +++$+++ :: Thanks Sarah - I wondered. Regards [[User:Bobf|Bob]] ([[User talk:Bobf|talk]]) 16:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

537300 +++$+++ 88.218.41.233 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537300 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-08 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.155076980E09 +++$+++ Aldux, the stuff you say about me, prove (apart from other things) that your judgement is not fair (the best word I can use). After the phrase ''Mywayyy should remain blocked because he hasnt contributed anything worthy in his entire wikipedian life' now you add a new shameful phase: ' considering his hate of anything related to Turkey'. Aldux, I dont know you and you certainly dont know me, but i can assure you I absolutely dont hate Turkey or any other country. If you find something bad I ve writen about Turkey show it to all of us. In the meantime maybe you should ask yourself why you hate ME so much and why you say things that are not correct and more important things you cant prove.Mywayyy +++$+++ Aldux, the stuff you say about me, prove (apart from other things) that your judgement is not fair (the best word I can use). After the phrase ''Mywayyy should remain blocked because he hasnt contributed anything worthy in his entire wikipedian life' now you add a new shameful phase: ' considering his hate of anything related to Turkey'. Aldux, I dont know you and you certainly dont know me, but i can assure you I absolutely dont hate Turkey or any other country. If you find something bad I ve writen about Turkey show it to all of us. In the meantime maybe you should ask yourself why you hate ME so much and why you say things that are not correct and more important things you cant prove.Mywayyy[[User:88.218.41.233|88.218.41.233]] 15:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
537301 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537300 +++$+++ 537300 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.155079140E09 +++$+++ I don't hate you; I'm only considerably annoyed by all the time I have to lose keeping an eye on socks of banned users.  As fo \"anything worthy in his entire wikipedian life\" that was too strong I recognize it, but I've been keeping an eye on you since you've been banned, and since then I haven't seen all these fantastic edits, that, I confirm, will be reverted mercilessly, because, as a veteran admin told me, the only way sockpuppetters cease vandalising is when they see all their edits reverted. The word \"hate\" was deliberately strong; but certainly you are biased on the issue of Greek-Turkey relations, and seem to see Turkey like Reagan saw USSR in the 1980s, i.e. \"the Great Satan\". But the point is you can make the most fantastic edits in the world, this doesn't count, because you cannot edit, and till know have shown no intention of respection the rules; even when you just said that, you violated them by removing Turkish names by Greek islands and editing other articles.-- +++$+++ :I don't hate you; I'm only considerably annoyed by all the time I have to lose keeping an eye on socks of banned users.  As fo "anything worthy in his entire wikipedian life" that was too strong I recognize it, but I've been keeping an eye on you since you've been banned, and since then I haven't seen all these fantastic edits, that, I confirm, will be reverted mercilessly, because, as a veteran admin told me, the only way sockpuppetters cease vandalising is when they see all their edits reverted. The word "hate" was deliberately strong; but certainly you are biased on the issue of Greek-Turkey relations, and seem to see Turkey like Reagan saw USSR in the 1980s, i.e. "the Great Satan". But the point is you can make the most fantastic edits in the world, this doesn't count, because you cannot edit, and till know have shown no intention of respection the rules; even when you just said that, you violated them by removing Turkish names by Greek islands and editing other articles.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

537302 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-08 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.155071520E09 +++$+++ Just, Aldux, have in mind that in [[Alexandroupoli]] there is no muslim minority (not to mention no turkish) at all. the minority is concentrated in Komotini and Xanthi. the only reasons to have the turkish name in the first line are historical and the proximity to turkey. Remember this, please, when the discussion for the whole issue will begin... Ciao -- +++$+++ Just, Aldux, have in mind that in [[Alexandroupoli]] there is no muslim minority (not to mention no turkish) at all. the minority is concentrated in Komotini and Xanthi. the only reasons to have the turkish name in the first line are historical and the proximity to turkey. Remember this, please, when the discussion for the whole issue will begin... Ciao --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 14:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
537303 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537302 +++$+++ 537302 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.155074820E09 +++$+++ U are right, muslims form about 7% of Evros Prefecture, and although i know that they live in villages northern of Alexandroupoli, i won't revert the article about the capital. the only valid reasons i see for the inclusion of the turkish name of the city are the 2 that i mentioned above. we'll see what the outcome of the discussion about it will be. for the moment, under Francis permission [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHectorian&diff=68411054&oldid=68409789], i will rename and expand this:[[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Islands in the Eastern Aegean)]]. -- +++$+++ :U are right, muslims form about 7% of Evros Prefecture, and although i know that they live in villages northern of Alexandroupoli, i won't revert the article about the capital. the only valid reasons i see for the inclusion of the turkish name of the city are the 2 that i mentioned above. we'll see what the outcome of the discussion about it will be. for the moment, under Francis permission [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHectorian&diff=68411054&oldid=68409789], i will rename and expand this:[[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Islands in the Eastern Aegean)]]. --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 15:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

275159 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-21 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.256146200E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Greg_Mathew&diff=321134940&oldid=303233110 Per this edit]. He did start Dusty Days but I really don't think its really notable but [http:\/\/www.mothershipmusic.com.au\/companyprofile.html this] is the only source I can find online however Prime News Wagga and Win News have had stories on Dusty Days but not available online. You may want to check at the [[Dusty Days]] article.  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greg_Mathew&diff=321134940&oldid=303233110 Per this edit]. He did start Dusty Days but I really don't think its really notable but [http://www.mothershipmusic.com.au/companyprofile.html this] is the only source I can find online however Prime News Wagga and Win News have had stories on Dusty Days but not available online. You may want to check at the [[Dusty Days]] article. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 10:30, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
275160 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275159 +++$+++ 275159 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.256146680E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm not surprised he started it; it was just the way it was written that got me and tht thing about \"logan haydn\" t-shirts. It should be sourced and written better!  +++$+++ :Yeah, I'm not surprised he started it; it was just the way it was written that got me and tht thing about "logan haydn" t-shirts. It should be sourced and written better! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:38, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

537304 +++$+++ Tchadienne +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-08 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.155101280E09 +++$+++ His actions on my talkpage are blockable offenses any way you slice it.  +++$+++ His actions on my talkpage are blockable offenses any way you slice it. [[User:Tchadienne|Tchadienne]] 22:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
537305 +++$+++ Tchadienne +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537304 +++$+++ 537304 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.155106080E09 +++$+++ Unprotect my talkpage.  +++$+++ :Unprotect my talkpage. [[User:Tchadienne|Tchadienne]] 23:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
537306 +++$+++ Tchadienne +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537304 +++$+++ 537305 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.155106980E09 +++$+++ How am I supposed to archive my talkpage when it's protected? Blocking him is not necessary but he has no right to protect my page, alter my comments, or delete the comments of other users as his last 4 edits do. This is harassment. I expect you to take the most minimal of action. He had no right to block me in the first place.  +++$+++ ::How am I supposed to archive my talkpage when it's protected? Blocking him is not necessary but he has no right to protect my page, alter my comments, or delete the comments of other users as his last 4 edits do. This is harassment. I expect you to take the most minimal of action. He had no right to block me in the first place. [[User:Tchadienne|Tchadienne]] 00:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

275161 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-30 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.256931120E09 +++$+++ The user replied to your comment, seemingly with intent to contribute positively going forward. Thoughts? \u2013<font face=\"verdana\" color=\"black\"> +++$+++ The user replied to your comment, seemingly with intent to contribute positively going forward. Thoughts? –<font face="verdana" color="black">[[user:xeno|'''xeno''']]</font>[[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 12:32, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
275162 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275161 +++$+++ 275161 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.257299940E09 +++$+++ As you appear to be on a short break, I went ahead and unblocked the user with some conditions: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Hadiyana&diff=323675487&oldid=323427166]. \u2013<font face=\"verdana\" color=\"black\"> +++$+++ *As you appear to be on a short break, I went ahead and unblocked the user with some conditions: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hadiyana&diff=323675487&oldid=323427166]. –<font face="verdana" color="black">[[user:xeno|'''xeno''']]</font>[[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 17:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
275163 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275161 +++$+++ 275162 +++$+++ 2009-11-07 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.257582840E09 +++$+++ Hi Xeno. I trust your judgment on the matter so no problems. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Hi Xeno. I trust your judgment on the matter so no problems. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

537308 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.155200940E09 +++$+++ Are you online right now? &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ Are you online right now? &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 02:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
537309 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537308 +++$+++ 537308 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.155285540E09 +++$+++ No, nothing right now. I'll let you know when I need help. &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ :No, nothing right now. I'll let you know when I need help. &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 01:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

275165 +++$+++ Wikislemur +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275165 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-10 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.260433140E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Wikislemur|Wikislemur]] ([[User talk:Wikislemur|talk]]) 00:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
275166 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275165 +++$+++ 275165 +++$+++ 2009-12-13 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.260706680E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the delay replying to you. Have you used another account before? I just ask because when you posted here you only had about 40 edits (now about 100 and no deleted edits). I generally try to give rollback fairly freely, but if all I have to go by is what's attributed to you with this account, I wouldn't feel comfortable giving someone with such low experience and only a few days here advanced access levels unless there was a special reason. Unless you've got another account you can identify which demonstrates that you have further prior experience here than just what's visible with this account, you're probably best off to wait until you have been here a bit longer and have more experience. You have twinkle rollback which is usually sufficient for new people just finding there way around the site and still learning the rules. Sorry.  +++$+++ :Sorry for the delay replying to you. Have you used another account before? I just ask because when you posted here you only had about 40 edits (now about 100 and no deleted edits). I generally try to give rollback fairly freely, but if all I have to go by is what's attributed to you with this account, I wouldn't feel comfortable giving someone with such low experience and only a few days here advanced access levels unless there was a special reason. Unless you've got another account you can identify which demonstrates that you have further prior experience here than just what's visible with this account, you're probably best off to wait until you have been here a bit longer and have more experience. You have twinkle rollback which is usually sufficient for new people just finding there way around the site and still learning the rules. Sorry. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

275167 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-20 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.261331220E09 +++$+++ Didnt work on the version of java in my imac \/or my firefox - reckon something is suspect (my computer or the web page) +++$+++ Didnt work on the version of java in my imac /or my firefox - reckon something is suspect (my computer or the web page)[[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 09:47, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
275168 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275167 +++$+++ 275167 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.261331640E09 +++$+++ I'm using Firefox on Windows 7 and it works for me, but it's not very user friendly...I only discovered that's how their referencing works when I clicked on the numbers several times trying to find the references and then wondered why nothing happened! The first paragraph you were concerned about is referenced to: Frank Farrell, Themes in Australian Historiography, University of New South Wales Press, Sydney, 1990. I can tell you others if there's any you want to know. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I'm using Firefox on Windows 7 and it works for me, but it's not very user friendly...I only discovered that's how their referencing works when I clicked on the numbers several times trying to find the references and then wondered why nothing happened! The first paragraph you were concerned about is referenced to: Frank Farrell, Themes in Australian Historiography, University of New South Wales Press, Sydney, 1990. I can tell you others if there's any you want to know. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
275169 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275167 +++$+++ 275168 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.261331820E09 +++$+++ It will also tell you the reference info if you right click on the footnote number and then click on properties. The reference for footnote 2 is Matthew Flinders, Journal of HMS Investigator, 1802-03, vol 2, p.384.  +++$+++ ::It will also tell you the reference info if you right click on the footnote number and then click on properties. The reference for footnote 2 is Matthew Flinders, Journal of HMS Investigator, 1802-03, vol 2, p.384. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
275170 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275167 +++$+++ 275168 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.261343280E09 +++$+++ Thanks v much for info - not interested in detail until further comment at the afd discussion - if it goes one way or the other depends whether I feel that the first para is really a travesty worth dealing with, or not.. Thanks for checking anyways  +++$+++ ::Thanks v much for info - not interested in detail until further comment at the afd discussion - if it goes one way or the other depends whether I feel that the first para is really a travesty worth dealing with, or not.. Thanks for checking anyways [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 13:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

537314 +++$+++ Macrakis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-16 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.155787080E09 +++$+++ Wouldn't it be better to have a ''different'' admin deal with Deucalionite?  You have made substantive edits to the Arvanites page... -- +++$+++ Wouldn't it be better to have a ''different'' admin deal with Deucalionite?  You have made substantive edits to the Arvanites page... --[[User:Macrakis|Macrakis]] 20:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
537315 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537314 +++$+++ 537314 +++$+++ 2006-08-16 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.155788940E09 +++$+++ Yeah, actually I concur with Macrakis here. No need to expose yourself to any later complaints about admin abuse. We can deal with it through a simple 3RR report if necessary, even if he should game the system in such a way as not to technically touch 3RR within 24h.  +++$+++ :Yeah, actually I concur with Macrakis here. No need to expose yourself to any later complaints about admin abuse. We can deal with it through a simple 3RR report if necessary, even if he should game the system in such a way as not to technically touch 3RR within 24h. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 21:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
537316 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537314 +++$+++ 537315 +++$+++ 2006-08-16 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.155792300E09 +++$+++ Re. your question to Macrakis, apparently the blocking policy says that \"sysops must not block editors with whom they are currently engaged in a content dispute\". Whether that counts for cases where you've only previously reverted in order to stop disruption seems a bit unclear, I've seen it interpreted that way, but I've also seen some of the rouger admins get away with blocking nevertheless. Anyway, I've now done a regular 3RR report - actually he had broken the rule already.  +++$+++ ::Re. your question to Macrakis, apparently the blocking policy says that "sysops must not block editors with whom they are currently engaged in a content dispute". Whether that counts for cases where you've only previously reverted in order to stop disruption seems a bit unclear, I've seen it interpreted that way, but I've also seen some of the rouger admins get away with blocking nevertheless. Anyway, I've now done a regular 3RR report - actually he had broken the rule already. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 22:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

275171 +++$+++ Wildhartlivie +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275171 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-21 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.261445940E09 +++$+++ Hi. I am inquiring into the change you made, referenced to IMDb, to Patton's middle name. As you may know, IMDb is not considered a reliable source and most things on it can be changed by a user. I encountered a person who claimed to be Patton's manager, but could not provide a valid reference for the middle name change that he insisted upon. I told him to have Patton contact the Wikimedia Foundation. I am questioning using IMDb as a reference for this name based the site's history as a source for personal details and would like to know why it is acceptable this time. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. I am inquiring into the change you made, referenced to IMDb, to Patton's middle name. As you may know, IMDb is not considered a reliable source and most things on it can be changed by a user. I encountered a person who claimed to be Patton's manager, but could not provide a valid reference for the middle name change that he insisted upon. I told him to have Patton contact the Wikimedia Foundation. I am questioning using IMDb as a reference for this name based the site's history as a source for personal details and would like to know why it is acceptable this time. Thanks. [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 17:39, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
275172 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275171 +++$+++ 275171 +++$+++ 2009-12-22 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.261484340E09 +++$+++ Patton's representative contacted the foundation about this matter and I handled the case. You say Patton's representative \"could not provide a valid reference for the middle name change\" but could you provide a valid reference for the name that you repeatedly restored? I ask because the version of the article I came to had no source at all cited and I looked back through a number of different versions of the article and it doesn't seem to have ever been sourced and actually seems to have first been added by an IP user [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Will_Patton&action=historysubmit&diff=221627312&oldid=214695609]. Interestingly, the IP who added that information made one other edit that day and that was to add false information to the [[Lewis Black]] article [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lewis_Black&diff=prev&oldid=221567288]. While IMDb is generally considered a questionable source under the reliable sources guideline due to the fact the bulk of their material is user-generated, in this case we have on the one hand a completely unsourced BLP containing questionable unsourced information and on the other, a representative of the subject telling us this information is incorrect and that IMDb's information is correct. WP:RS is very important but don't forget it is a guideline and it doesn't trump the policy on biographies of living people which requires questionable unsourced information be \"removed immediately and without waiting for discussion\" and also clearly states that we should \"remove any unsourced material to which an editor objects in good faith\". We absolutely should not be maintaining unsourced information in BLPs that we've been told by the subject's representative is false. I can understand you generally not wanting to accept IMDb as a source and I've explained to Patton's people that IMDb is considered a questionable source for most information due to the user generated content, but I cannot understand you insisting on maintaining unsourced information in a BLP when you've been told it is incorrect and repeatedly reverting to keep the unsourced information in the article. I would have understood if you'd just removed the middle name entirely on being told it was incorrect as as it's really not vital to have a person's middle name and no middle name is certainly better than a false one, but I can't understand you insisting that the unsourced name had to remain in the article in the face of a representative of the artist saying it was not only unsourced but incorrect. Even if you don't believe the person was who they claimed, the fact remains the information originally in the article was unsourced and someone was making what appeared to be a good faith attempt to tell us this information is incorrect. Think about this carefully for a moment: The original middle name that you repeated restored to the article was unsourced. While I agree that IMDb is not a great source to use, it's certainly a step up from no source at all. I will also add that I'm not entirely comfortable with the way you were using rollback in this case. Rollback should only be used on vandalism and blatantly unproductive edits. Those edits were made by someone you knew was identifying themselves as a representative of the subject and there was no evidence at all to suggest that they were a vandal or otherwise editing in bad faith, rather they had explained that they were making a good faith attempt to remove incorrect unsourced information from a BLP, which is entirely supported by policy. This was more like a content dispute and it is not what rollback is meant to be used for. I would really urge you to be more careful with your use of rollback in future and perhaps have another look over the rollback guideline.  +++$+++ :Patton's representative contacted the foundation about this matter and I handled the case. You say Patton's representative "could not provide a valid reference for the middle name change" but could you provide a valid reference for the name that you repeatedly restored? I ask because the version of the article I came to had no source at all cited and I looked back through a number of different versions of the article and it doesn't seem to have ever been sourced and actually seems to have first been added by an IP user [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Will_Patton&action=historysubmit&diff=221627312&oldid=214695609]. Interestingly, the IP who added that information made one other edit that day and that was to add false information to the [[Lewis Black]] article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lewis_Black&diff=prev&oldid=221567288]. While IMDb is generally considered a questionable source under the reliable sources guideline due to the fact the bulk of their material is user-generated, in this case we have on the one hand a completely unsourced BLP containing questionable unsourced information and on the other, a representative of the subject telling us this information is incorrect and that IMDb's information is correct. WP:RS is very important but don't forget it is a guideline and it doesn't trump the policy on biographies of living people which requires questionable unsourced information be "removed immediately and without waiting for discussion" and also clearly states that we should "remove any unsourced material to which an editor objects in good faith". We absolutely should not be maintaining unsourced information in BLPs that we've been told by the subject's representative is false. I can understand you generally not wanting to accept IMDb as a source and I've explained to Patton's people that IMDb is considered a questionable source for most information due to the user generated content, but I cannot understand you insisting on maintaining unsourced information in a BLP when you've been told it is incorrect and repeatedly reverting to keep the unsourced information in the article. I would have understood if you'd just removed the middle name entirely on being told it was incorrect as as it's really not vital to have a person's middle name and no middle name is certainly better than a false one, but I can't understand you insisting that the unsourced name had to remain in the article in the face of a representative of the artist saying it was not only unsourced but incorrect. Even if you don't believe the person was who they claimed, the fact remains the information originally in the article was unsourced and someone was making what appeared to be a good faith attempt to tell us this information is incorrect. Think about this carefully for a moment: The original middle name that you repeated restored to the article was unsourced. While I agree that IMDb is not a great source to use, it's certainly a step up from no source at all. I will also add that I'm not entirely comfortable with the way you were using rollback in this case. Rollback should only be used on vandalism and blatantly unproductive edits. Those edits were made by someone you knew was identifying themselves as a representative of the subject and there was no evidence at all to suggest that they were a vandal or otherwise editing in bad faith, rather they had explained that they were making a good faith attempt to remove incorrect unsourced information from a BLP, which is entirely supported by policy. This was more like a content dispute and it is not what rollback is meant to be used for. I would really urge you to be more careful with your use of rollback in future and perhaps have another look over the rollback guideline. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

275173 +++$+++ BrownHairedGirl +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-26 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.261859940E09 +++$+++ <div class=\"floatleft\" style=\"margin-bottom:0\">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]<\/div>An article that you have been involved in editing, [[Accidentally on Purpose (pilot)]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]].  If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/{{str trim|Accidentally on Purpose (pilot)}}]].  Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw -->  -- +++$+++ <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, [[Accidentally on Purpose (pilot)]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]].  If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/{{str trim|Accidentally on Purpose (pilot)}}]].  Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw -->  --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#996600; cursor: not-allowed;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 12:39, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
275174 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275173 +++$+++ 275173 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.261865520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:12, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

275175 +++$+++ Mattopaedia +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275175 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-31 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.262294100E09 +++$+++ From time to time I find myself reverting vandalism in articles I'm watching or where ever I find it, and its a bit of a pain because I do all my edits manually (because I edit from various - <small>ahem, work, <\/small> - locations).  I was thinking having rollback might help, and was wondering if you'd grant it for me please.  I promise I'll be appropriate with it (yes, I've read [[WP:ROLLBACK]]) and although I'm not likely to suddenly become wikipedias most prolific rollbacker  (you'll notice I come and go a bit, since the real world is a lot more demanding of my time), I think it'd be a useful tool.  Thanks, and happy new year!  +++$+++ From time to time I find myself reverting vandalism in articles I'm watching or where ever I find it, and its a bit of a pain because I do all my edits manually (because I edit from various - <small>ahem, work, </small> - locations).  I was thinking having rollback might help, and was wondering if you'd grant it for me please.  I promise I'll be appropriate with it (yes, I've read [[WP:ROLLBACK]]) and although I'm not likely to suddenly become wikipedias most prolific rollbacker  (you'll notice I come and go a bit, since the real world is a lot more demanding of my time), I think it'd be a useful tool.  Thanks, and happy new year! [[User:Mattopaedia|<font color='Indigo'><b>Matto</b></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mattopaedia|<font color='DodgerBlue'>paedia </font>]][[User talk:Mattopaedia|<font color='Olive'> <sup>Have a yarn</sup></font>]] 13:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
275176 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275175 +++$+++ 275175 +++$+++ 2009-12-31 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.262296920E09 +++$+++ Hi Matt, happy to do that for you and have now turned it on. I'm sure you know what you're doing but the main rule is that it's only for vandalism and such that are self-explanatory reverts to anyone looking at the edit and don't require an explanation by edit summary. You should start noticing a link [rollback] on your watchlist and when looking at the history of a page, it will display only next to the most recent edit. When you click it, it will revert the last edit or the last series of edits by one person, so just be careful, if someone has made a series of consecutive edits and you don't want to rollback the whole set, your best bet is either undo or reverting by hand. If you run into any problems or need any help or have any questions, please don't hesitate to let me know. A happy new year to you and yours, too, Matt. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi Matt, happy to do that for you and have now turned it on. I'm sure you know what you're doing but the main rule is that it's only for vandalism and such that are self-explanatory reverts to anyone looking at the edit and don't require an explanation by edit summary. You should start noticing a link [rollback] on your watchlist and when looking at the history of a page, it will display only next to the most recent edit. When you click it, it will revert the last edit or the last series of edits by one person, so just be careful, if someone has made a series of consecutive edits and you don't want to rollback the whole set, your best bet is either undo or reverting by hand. If you run into any problems or need any help or have any questions, please don't hesitate to let me know. A happy new year to you and yours, too, Matt. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

275177 +++$+++ HiLo48 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-01 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.262374020E09 +++$+++ I know what you meant, but I'm not sure Aegisint will. I'll put a small clarification on his Talk(?) page.  +++$+++ I know what you meant, but I'm not sure Aegisint will. I'll put a small clarification on his Talk(?) page. [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 11:27, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
275178 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275177 +++$+++ 275177 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.262375100E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'll go back and change that, don't want to confuse him. Mine actually does say \"talk\" on article pages but I think I installed some monobook javascript ages ago that changed it and I forgot it normally says discussion. Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks, I'll go back and change that, don't want to confuse him. Mine actually does say "talk" on article pages but I think I installed some monobook javascript ages ago that changed it and I forgot it normally says discussion. Thanks! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

275179 +++$+++ EdJohnston +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-02 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.262442240E09 +++$+++ What would you think of extending [[User:Leveque|Leveque]]'s block to indef, since his continued puppetry indicates he is unlikely to have a change of heart? Unless it is extended, the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:BlockList&ip=Leveque block on his main account] will expire on 19 January.  +++$+++ What would you think of extending [[User:Leveque|Leveque]]'s block to indef, since his continued puppetry indicates he is unlikely to have a change of heart? Unless it is extended, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:BlockList&ip=Leveque block on his main account] will expire on 19 January. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 06:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
275180 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275179 +++$+++ 275179 +++$+++ 2010-01-02 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.262443380E09 +++$+++ (after ec)I would agree wholeheartedly, Ed. He's obviously not here to work on articles and just seems to want to fill userpages up with his external links. I agree that it seems very unlikely at this point that he will have a change of heart, but if he does he can appeal to the unblock list. There's really no reason to allow him to return automatically in two weeks if we don't have a reasonable idea that he's going to behave and use the project appropriately. I will go and extend the block now.   +++$+++ :(after ec)I would agree wholeheartedly, Ed. He's obviously not here to work on articles and just seems to want to fill userpages up with his external links. I agree that it seems very unlikely at this point that he will have a change of heart, but if he does he can appeal to the unblock list. There's really no reason to allow him to return automatically in two weeks if we don't have a reasonable idea that he's going to behave and use the project appropriately. I will go and extend the block now.  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

13037 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Maile66 +++$+++ 13037 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-06 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.307408040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 17:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
13038 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Maile66 +++$+++ 13037 +++$+++ 13037 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.307408880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ * [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 18:08, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

537326 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-20 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.156113060E09 +++$+++ Hi, am I right in thinking that this {{vandal|HarHar}} is another Faethon sock?  +++$+++ Hi, am I right in thinking that this {{vandal|HarHar}} is another Faethon sock? [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 15:31, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
537327 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537326 +++$+++ 537326 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.156115460E09 +++$+++ Weird case, isn't it. Do you know the earlier history? I've seen some incarnations of the guy making pretty good edits at times. Why were they banned in the first place?  +++$+++ :Weird case, isn't it. Do you know the earlier history? I've seen some incarnations of the guy making pretty good edits at times. Why were they banned in the first place? [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 16:11, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

275184 +++$+++ Thedarxide +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-02 08:55:00 +++$+++ 1.262451300E09 +++$+++ You looked in to the users involved in the Behringer dispute.  I stopped assuming good faith back in October, so could you run a check on [[User:Minto2]].  I am incredibly suspicious when new users show up and take up old arguments.  +++$+++ You looked in to the users involved in the Behringer dispute.  I stopped assuming good faith back in October, so could you run a check on [[User:Minto2]].  I am incredibly suspicious when new users show up and take up old arguments. [[User:Thedarxide|Thedarxide]] ([[User talk:Thedarxide|talk]]) 08:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
275185 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275184 +++$+++ 275184 +++$+++ 2010-01-03 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.262517000E09 +++$+++ Hi, Thedarxide. Yes, I agree that account does appear extremely suspect. I feel a bit hesitant to block on the basis of one talk page edit though, so I will keep an eye on it and see what they do, but if more keep appearing and being tendentious, we should request a checkuser. I'm on Factiva at the moment and will try to add some more newspaper sources later to augment and reinforce the ones there in the controversy sections. Happy new year,  +++$+++ :Hi, Thedarxide. Yes, I agree that account does appear extremely suspect. I feel a bit hesitant to block on the basis of one talk page edit though, so I will keep an eye on it and see what they do, but if more keep appearing and being tendentious, we should request a checkuser. I'm on Factiva at the moment and will try to add some more newspaper sources later to augment and reinforce the ones there in the controversy sections. Happy new year, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

13042 +++$+++ BusterD +++$+++ Giants2008 +++$+++ 13042 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312573500E09 +++$+++ Thanks again, Giants2008. I see that the hook is now in the queue for 5pm (Minneapolis time) today. My one disappointment is that the hook is so truncated as to be a bit boring. My interest in the subject, and the subject's notability, derives from the subject's durability and duration in his chosen field. 78 years filing stories, 75 of those for pay, even when in the army. If I'd known the hook was to be reduced to a snippet about something he did as a college freshman, I'd have constructed my alt hooks in a much different way. Live and learn. When [[User:Gordgus]] and I build it into FA status, returning the subject to the main page again, we'll make sure our introduction tightly relates the reasons for our fascination with the subject. Don't mean to make this sound like a downer. I'm very appreciative of your help with the process. I may call on you again, if that's okay.  +++$+++ Thanks again, Giants2008. I see that the hook is now in the queue for 5pm (Minneapolis time) today. My one disappointment is that the hook is so truncated as to be a bit boring. My interest in the subject, and the subject's notability, derives from the subject's durability and duration in his chosen field. 78 years filing stories, 75 of those for pay, even when in the army. If I'd known the hook was to be reduced to a snippet about something he did as a college freshman, I'd have constructed my alt hooks in a much different way. Live and learn. When [[User:Gordgus]] and I build it into FA status, returning the subject to the main page again, we'll make sure our introduction tightly relates the reasons for our fascination with the subject. Don't mean to make this sound like a downer. I'm very appreciative of your help with the process. I may call on you again, if that's okay. [[User:BusterD|BusterD]] ([[User talk:BusterD|talk]]) 12:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
13043 +++$+++ BusterD +++$+++ Giants2008 +++$+++ 13042 +++$+++ 13042 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312606920E09 +++$+++ Nice folks over at DYK have fixed it to my liking and it's about to go live. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Nice folks over at DYK have fixed it to my liking and it's about to go live. Thanks again. [[User:BusterD|BusterD]] ([[User talk:BusterD|talk]]) 22:02, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

537332 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-23 10:03:00 +++$+++ 1.156352580E09 +++$+++ Could you semi-protect [[Template:EU countries and candidates]]? Bonaparte keeps editing it, thanks. :) &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ Could you semi-protect [[Template:EU countries and candidates]]? Bonaparte keeps editing it, thanks. :) &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 10:03, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
537333 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537332 +++$+++ 537332 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 10:17:00 +++$+++ 1.156353420E09 +++$+++ ''Grazie'', I didn't know you were online. &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ :''Grazie'', I didn't know you were online. &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 10:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
537334 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537332 +++$+++ 537333 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.156353720E09 +++$+++ BTW, there's a bit of a content dispute at [[Satu Mare]] and [[Oradea]]. Anonimu just broke the 3RR, but wasn't warned and therefore it doesn't count. Perhaps you could fully protect the pages? &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ ::BTW, there's a bit of a content dispute at [[Satu Mare]] and [[Oradea]]. Anonimu just broke the 3RR, but wasn't warned and therefore it doesn't count. Perhaps you could fully protect the pages? &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 10:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
537335 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537332 +++$+++ 537333 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.156353780E09 +++$+++ Also it appears [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Oradea&diff=71353889&oldid=71351840 Bonaparte] has decided to join in on the fun... &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ ::Also it appears [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oradea&diff=71353889&oldid=71351840 Bonaparte] has decided to join in on the fun... &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 10:23, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
537336 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537332 +++$+++ 537335 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.156354440E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot, that helped. &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ :::Thanks a lot, that helped. &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 10:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

13045 +++$+++ Jonchapple +++$+++ Snappy +++$+++ 13045 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311736380E09 +++$+++ Sorry for my misinformed addition to the intro of Mr de Valera's article. Which state was he head of state of? The [[Irish Republic]]? I was just trying to clarify, as we can't just have that he served as head of state and government of Ireland (i.e. the island) in the lead when it's simply not true. Best,  +++$+++ Sorry for my misinformed addition to the intro of Mr de Valera's article. Which state was he head of state of? The [[Irish Republic]]? I was just trying to clarify, as we can't just have that he served as head of state and government of Ireland (i.e. the island) in the lead when it's simply not true. Best, [[User:Jonchapple|<font color="#004225">JonChapple</font>]][[User_talk:Jonchapple|<sup><font color="#F28500">Talk</font></sup>]] 20:13, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
13046 +++$+++ Jonchapple +++$+++ Snappy +++$+++ 13045 +++$+++ 13045 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.312339740E09 +++$+++ Bump.  +++$+++ :Bump. [[User:Jonchapple|<font color="#004225">JonChapple</font>]][[User_talk:Jonchapple|<sup><font color="#F28500">Talk</font></sup>]] 19:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13047 +++$+++ Snappy +++$+++ Snappy +++$+++ 13045 +++$+++ 13046 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.312339860E09 +++$+++ Read the article, the info is all there! Also [[Government of Ireland]] does not refer to the state but the nation.  +++$+++ ::Read the article, the info is all there! Also [[Government of Ireland]] does not refer to the state but the nation. [[User:Snappy|Snappy]] ([[User talk:Snappy#top|talk]]) 19:51, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13048 +++$+++ Jonchapple +++$+++ Snappy +++$+++ 13045 +++$+++ 13047 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.312340100E09 +++$+++ Hardly. Does the [[Government of Ireland]] exercise executive control over Northern Ireland?  +++$+++ :::Hardly. Does the [[Government of Ireland]] exercise executive control over Northern Ireland? [[User:Jonchapple|<font color="#004225">JonChapple</font>]][[User_talk:Jonchapple|<sup><font color="#F28500">Talk</font></sup>]] 19:55, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13049 +++$+++ Snappy +++$+++ Snappy +++$+++ 13045 +++$+++ 13048 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.312340460E09 +++$+++ No, nor does it claim to but that its name because the name of state of which it governs is Ireland, only on en:Wikipedia is it called [[Republic of Ireland]] (Read the intro and footnotes for more info). This is an old issue which has been re-hashed many times, many places here, so if you have any specific points to discuss, please start a new section on the relevant article talk page, as my talk page is not the appropriate place for this. Rdgs,  +++$+++ ::::No, nor does it claim to but that its name because the name of state of which it governs is Ireland, only on en:Wikipedia is it called [[Republic of Ireland]] (Read the intro and footnotes for more info). This is an old issue which has been re-hashed many times, many places here, so if you have any specific points to discuss, please start a new section on the relevant article talk page, as my talk page is not the appropriate place for this. Rdgs, [[User:Snappy|Snappy]] ([[User talk:Snappy#top|talk]]) 20:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13050 +++$+++ Jonchapple +++$+++ Snappy +++$+++ 13045 +++$+++ 13049 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.312340820E09 +++$+++ I'm aware the state's name is \"Ireland\", and that's what the Ireland in Gov't of Ireland refers to\u2014i.e. the \"state\", not \"the nation\", in your words. Anyway, I've rejigged my edit of de Valera's intro. Ta-ta.  +++$+++ :::::I'm aware the state's name is "Ireland", and that's what the Ireland in Gov't of Ireland refers to—i.e. the "state", not "the nation", in your words. Anyway, I've rejigged my edit of de Valera's intro. Ta-ta. [[User:Jonchapple|<font color="#004225">JonChapple</font>]][[User_talk:Jonchapple|<sup><font color="#F28500">Talk</font></sup>]] 20:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

275192 +++$+++ Deon +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-31 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.262298840E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, Just wishing you a happy and safe new year. Hope you have a lovely 2010. &mdash;  +++$+++ Hi Sarah, Just wishing you a happy and safe new year. Hope you have a lovely 2010. &mdash; [[User:Deon|Deon]]<sup><font color="purple">[[User_talk:Deon|'''talk''']]</font></sup> 14:34, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
275193 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275192 +++$+++ 275192 +++$+++ 2009-12-31 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.262302320E09 +++$+++ Mr Deon! I was just thinking about you tonight! I was meaning to leave you a message, how psychic is that! I hope everything is well with you and glad to see you're still around and I hope you and your family have a very happy year ahead. Would be great to see you at another meetup some time in the future. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Mr Deon! I was just thinking about you tonight! I was meaning to leave you a message, how psychic is that! I hope everything is well with you and glad to see you're still around and I hope you and your family have a very happy year ahead. Would be great to see you at another meetup some time in the future. :) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 15:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
275194 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275192 +++$+++ 275193 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.262335740E09 +++$+++ Happy New Year! I hope you have a happy, safe and successful year.  +++$+++ ::Happy New Year! I hope you have a happy, safe and successful year. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 00:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
275195 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275192 +++$+++ 275194 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.262336040E09 +++$+++ Thank you Bidgee and same to you. I enjoyed meeting you in Canberra and getting to know you a bit in person and hope that you'll be able to get involved in future Wikimedia Australia projects. I hope you and your family have a very happy and healthy 2010. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Thank you Bidgee and same to you. I enjoyed meeting you in Canberra and getting to know you a bit in person and hope that you'll be able to get involved in future Wikimedia Australia projects. I hope you and your family have a very happy and healthy 2010. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
275196 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275192 +++$+++ 275195 +++$+++ 2010-01-04 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.262642880E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. I also enjoyed meeting yourself and the others who make up the Australian editors (even though it wasn't all of them of cause!). I'm hoping to get down to Melbourne some time for a day or two visit but also Canberra and hoping for Sydney or s Perth some where in there! Though this week I'm feeling older (Five more years and I'll be the big Three O, :S).  +++$+++ ::::You're welcome. I also enjoyed meeting yourself and the others who make up the Australian editors (even though it wasn't all of them of cause!). I'm hoping to get down to Melbourne some time for a day or two visit but also Canberra and hoping for Sydney or s Perth some where in there! Though this week I'm feeling older (Five more years and I'll be the big Three O, :S). [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 14:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
275197 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275192 +++$+++ 275196 +++$+++ 2010-01-05 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.262685840E09 +++$+++ Oh, Bidgee, you're getting ''so'' old! :p Wait until you see the really big 4-0 on the horizon and ''then'' you'll really have something to be feeling old about! lol Happy birthday, I hope you have a very nice birthday and don't worry, 25 is still very much a spring chicken.:)  +++$+++ :::::Oh, Bidgee, you're getting ''so'' old! :p Wait until you see the really big 4-0 on the horizon and ''then'' you'll really have something to be feeling old about! lol Happy birthday, I hope you have a very nice birthday and don't worry, 25 is still very much a spring chicken.:) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

537337 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-24 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.156454940E09 +++$+++ Ha! I am so fed up with all those Italian tourists here, that I decided to greed you in Greek for a change! I know you are one of the greatest contributors of [[Macedon]]. The map included there, along with the adjacent text, could justify the first clause that needs citation in [[Macedonia (terminology)#In history]]. I saw the books of Borza and Hammond, but have no access to them. Can you please add the citation? Efharisto! :-)  +++$+++ Ha! I am so fed up with all those Italian tourists here, that I decided to greed you in Greek for a change! I know you are one of the greatest contributors of [[Macedon]]. The map included there, along with the adjacent text, could justify the first clause that needs citation in [[Macedonia (terminology)#In history]]. I saw the books of Borza and Hammond, but have no access to them. Can you please add the citation? Efharisto! :-) [[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">:N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>:</span>]] 14:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
537338 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537337 +++$+++ 537337 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.156458720E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Macedonia_%28terminology%29&curid=5081318&diff=71608681&oldid=71595419 Grazie] (ok, ok, nobody can ever get fed up with Italian, anyway!) :-)  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Macedonia_%28terminology%29&curid=5081318&diff=71608681&oldid=71595419 Grazie] (ok, ok, nobody can ever get fed up with Italian, anyway!) :-) [[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">:N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>:</span>]] 15:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
537339 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537337 +++$+++ 537338 +++$+++ 2006-08-27 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.156734180E09 +++$+++ Grazie per il Barnstar. Sei molto generoso. Mi pare che non merito tutte quelle medaglie. Se avevo assegnato medaglie rispettive al tuo lavoro, la tua pagina sarrebe troppo lunga per WP! [http:\/\/www-old.ectaco.com\/online\/diction.php3?lang=5&q=1&refid=2217&rfr_id=1&rqt_id=20903913&pagelang=23&word=%D3%F5%E3%F7%E1%F1%E7%F4%DE%F1%E9%E1&direction=2&x=28&y=6 \u03a3\u03c5\u03b3\u03c7\u03b1\u03c1\u03b7\u03c4\u03ae\u03c1\u03b9\u03b1]!  +++$+++ ::Grazie per il Barnstar. Sei molto generoso. Mi pare che non merito tutte quelle medaglie. Se avevo assegnato medaglie rispettive al tuo lavoro, la tua pagina sarrebe troppo lunga per WP! [http://www-old.ectaco.com/online/diction.php3?lang=5&q=1&refid=2217&rfr_id=1&rqt_id=20903913&pagelang=23&word=%D3%F5%E3%F7%E1%F1%E7%F4%DE%F1%E9%E1&direction=2&x=28&y=6 Συγχαρητήρια]! [[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">:N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>:</span>]] 20:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
537340 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537337 +++$+++ 537339 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.156867140E09 +++$+++ Ciao again. Do you have by any chance any reference for the Ancient Macedonians' height? I'm sure I've heard it before that they were tall. Also, since I know you contributed to the etymology section in the region article, could you also cite the unatested 'bahuvrili' hypothesis please?  +++$+++ :::Ciao again. Do you have by any chance any reference for the Ancient Macedonians' height? I'm sure I've heard it before that they were tall. Also, since I know you contributed to the etymology section in the region article, could you also cite the unatested 'bahuvrili' hypothesis please? [[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">:N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>:</span>]] 08:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

13051 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Snappy +++$+++ 13051 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312338060E09 +++$+++ Nice work removing flags from biographical infoboxes, for example [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Keith_Holyoake&diff=prev&oldid=442713008 here]. [[WP:MOSICON]] is pretty clearcut on the subject. -- +++$+++ Nice work removing flags from biographical infoboxes, for example [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Keith_Holyoake&diff=prev&oldid=442713008 here]. [[WP:MOSICON]] is pretty clearcut on the subject. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 19:21, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13052 +++$+++ Snappy +++$+++ Snappy +++$+++ 13051 +++$+++ 13051 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.312338840E09 +++$+++ Thanks. It is.  +++$+++ :Thanks. It is. [[User:Snappy|Snappy]] ([[User talk:Snappy#top|talk]]) 19:34, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

537341 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-25 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.156498380E09 +++$+++ Aldux, you may have already spent more time dealing with this than you wish, but I initiated a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_investigation#Registered_users request for investigation] into [[User:Cretanpride]]'s editing a couple of days ago. No action has yet been taken. I think you're allowed to add your own comment if you wish. In addition to being a jerk, our sockpuppeteer is violating a clear consensus of editors in his edits, so admin action is definitely warranted.  +++$+++ Aldux, you may have already spent more time dealing with this than you wish, but I initiated a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_investigation#Registered_users request for investigation] into [[User:Cretanpride]]'s editing a couple of days ago. No action has yet been taken. I think you're allowed to add your own comment if you wish. In addition to being a jerk, our sockpuppeteer is violating a clear consensus of editors in his edits, so admin action is definitely warranted. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 02:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
537342 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537341 +++$+++ 537341 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.156548480E09 +++$+++ [[User:Ellinas]] might not be a sock, but he meets the definition of a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet#Meatpuppets meatpuppet]. Personally, as long as he behaves himself, I'm willing to have him stay; but it does look like he's already in violation of policy.  +++$+++ :[[User:Ellinas]] might not be a sock, but he meets the definition of a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet#Meatpuppets meatpuppet]. Personally, as long as he behaves himself, I'm willing to have him stay; but it does look like he's already in violation of policy. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 16:28, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

275198 +++$+++ Ryan Postlethwaite +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-05 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.262685060E09 +++$+++ Hey Sarah! Just saw your name as it popped up on my watchlist and thought I'd pop over to say hey! :-) I hope you're well - I haven't had chance to say hi for a long time. I've just started a new degree in law (don't worry, I didn't mess up my pharmacology degree - I graduated and then went on to get my masters in biomedical and forensic science!) - bit of a change from what I originally did, but I'd like to move into human rights law. Anyway, I hope you're well! Take care, ''' +++$+++ Hey Sarah! Just saw your name as it popped up on my watchlist and thought I'd pop over to say hey! :-) I hope you're well - I haven't had chance to say hi for a long time. I've just started a new degree in law (don't worry, I didn't mess up my pharmacology degree - I graduated and then went on to get my masters in biomedical and forensic science!) - bit of a change from what I originally did, but I'd like to move into human rights law. Anyway, I hope you're well! Take care, '''[[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|<font color="green">Ryan</font> <font color="purple">Postlethwaite</font>]]<sup>See [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Postlethwaite|the mess I've created]] or [[User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite|let's have banter]]</sup>''' 01:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
275199 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275198 +++$+++ 275198 +++$+++ 2010-01-05 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.262685540E09 +++$+++ Hi Ryan, very glad to hear from you! That's great; don't worry, I knew that you'd finished your Pharmacology course and had started the forensic science masters. I'd love to do something like that, it seems like a really interesting field. It sounds like you're collecting degrees! Either that or you don't want to get a \"real\" job! :p Human rights law is a really good and worthwhile field to go into. I hope you enjoy the law course. Hope you had a happy Christmas and new year and have a fantastic 2010. Thanks for dropping by, it's really nice to hear from you. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi Ryan, very glad to hear from you! That's great; don't worry, I knew that you'd finished your Pharmacology course and had started the forensic science masters. I'd love to do something like that, it seems like a really interesting field. It sounds like you're collecting degrees! Either that or you don't want to get a "real" job! :p Human rights law is a really good and worthwhile field to go into. I hope you enjoy the law course. Hope you had a happy Christmas and new year and have a fantastic 2010. Thanks for dropping by, it's really nice to hear from you. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

13055 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Mhym +++$+++ 13055 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-23 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.166911020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions! ++ +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions! ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 13:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
13056 +++$+++ SusanLesch +++$+++ Mhym +++$+++ 13055 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.166922960E09 +++$+++ [[User:Mhym|Mhym]] created the article [[Alexander Kronrod]]. Thanks to you both! - +++$+++ :*[[User:Mhym|Mhym]] created the article [[Alexander Kronrod]]. Thanks to you both! -[[User:Susanlesch|Susanlesch]] 17:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

275200 +++$+++ IZAK +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275200 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-05 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.262713800E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your input and patience,  +++$+++ Thank you for your input and patience, [[User:IZAK|IZAK]] ([[User talk:IZAK|talk]]) 09:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
275201 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275200 +++$+++ 275200 +++$+++ 2010-01-05 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.262721000E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I've made a quick comment supporting a case and will try to expand and add some diffs in the next day or so. If you don't mind some advice, if they accept the case, I recommend you be careful to be very concise and to present diffs that support your statements and also especially careful that you don't make comments that may be viewed as personal attacks or civility vios.  +++$+++ :Thanks, I've made a quick comment supporting a case and will try to expand and add some diffs in the next day or so. If you don't mind some advice, if they accept the case, I recommend you be careful to be very concise and to present diffs that support your statements and also especially careful that you don't make comments that may be viewed as personal attacks or civility vios. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

275202 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275202 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-06 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.262787060E09 +++$+++ Hello.  This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#User_talk:Watchover_-_need_an_independent_admin_review|here]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ Hello.  This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User_talk:Watchover_-_need_an_independent_admin_review|here]]. Thank you. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 06:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
275203 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275202 +++$+++ 275202 +++$+++ 2010-01-06 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.262791800E09 +++$+++ Thanks Orderinchaos. I've commented. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks Orderinchaos. I've commented. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

570155 +++$+++ Sardanaphalus +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570155 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-13 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.205413260E09 +++$+++ ...I haven't lost sight of your continuing efforts to document and promote good (template) formatting practice. I in the meantime have been implementing <code><nowiki>{{nowrap begin}}<\/nowiki><\/code> etc where it seems needed (i.e. most everywhere in Templateland). Thanks.  +++$+++ ...I haven't lost sight of your continuing efforts to document and promote good (template) formatting practice. I in the meantime have been implementing <code><nowiki>{{nowrap begin}}</nowiki></code> etc where it seems needed (i.e. most everywhere in Templateland). Thanks. [[User:Sardanaphalus|Sardanaphalus]] ([[User talk:Sardanaphalus|talk]]) 06:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
570156 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570155 +++$+++ 570155 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.205414940E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 06:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
570157 +++$+++ Sardanaphalus +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570155 +++$+++ 570156 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.205415120E09 +++$+++ Oops, I meant to do that. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :: Oops, I meant to do that. Thanks again. [[User:Sardanaphalus|Sardanaphalus]] ([[User talk:Sardanaphalus|talk]]) 06:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

275204 +++$+++ DASHBot +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275204 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-09 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.263024060E09 +++$+++ Thanks!-- +++$+++ Thanks!--[[User:DASHBot|DASHBot]] ([[User talk:DASHBot|talk]]) 00:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
275205 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275204 +++$+++ 275204 +++$+++ 2010-01-09 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.263026700E09 +++$+++ Uh-huh. You might be a bot but your creator needs to teach you how to read histories and logs properly because I absolutely do not and did not create unsourced BLPs. Kindly ask your creator to teach you how to read when an admin moves a page to a new name or deletes previous revisions due to BLP violating content and comprehend that said admin did not create those unsourced blps.  +++$+++ :Uh-huh. You might be a bot but your creator needs to teach you how to read histories and logs properly because I absolutely do not and did not create unsourced BLPs. Kindly ask your creator to teach you how to read when an admin moves a page to a new name or deletes previous revisions due to BLP violating content and comprehend that said admin did not create those unsourced blps. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

275206 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-09 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.263027240E09 +++$+++ Hmph - some bots do have them! :)  +++$+++ Hmph - some bots do have them! :) [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 00:54, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
275207 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275206 +++$+++ 275206 +++$+++ 2010-01-09 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.263109800E09 +++$+++ Yes. You'd think bots could check the logs and work out if an admin has performed maintenance work that leaves them as the first line in the history of articles they did not create and if they can't, they shouldn't be bothering people with this nonsense. It pisses me off being labeled as \"an uploader of unsourced blps\", even if only by a bot. I'm obsessive about sourcing information about BLPs to the point of being anal about it, having seen some of the pain and damage caused to subjects of articles via [[WP:OTRS|OTRS]]. If anything I'm at the other extreme and I try to source everything, like this is an example of how I write blp content [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Moira_Kelly_%28humanitarian%29&diff=prev&oldid=335634958] which has about 30 citation points in the material I added.  +++$+++ :Yes. You'd think bots could check the logs and work out if an admin has performed maintenance work that leaves them as the first line in the history of articles they did not create and if they can't, they shouldn't be bothering people with this nonsense. It pisses me off being labeled as "an uploader of unsourced blps", even if only by a bot. I'm obsessive about sourcing information about BLPs to the point of being anal about it, having seen some of the pain and damage caused to subjects of articles via [[WP:OTRS|OTRS]]. If anything I'm at the other extreme and I try to source everything, like this is an example of how I write blp content [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moira_Kelly_%28humanitarian%29&diff=prev&oldid=335634958] which has about 30 citation points in the material I added. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 23:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

537354 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.156910700E09 +++$+++ ...I left you a couple of messages above in the [[#Gia sou!]] section... +++$+++ ...I left you a couple of messages above in the [[#Gia sou!]] section...[[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">:N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>:</span>]] 21:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
537355 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537354 +++$+++ 537354 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.156995720E09 +++$+++ Thanks Al. I think I've found something. I'll post it there. Please comment. +++$+++ :Thanks Al. I think I've found something. I'll post it there. Please comment.[[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">:N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>:</span>]] 20:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

89559 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-21 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.308713520E09 +++$+++ Amazing, what you found! -- +++$+++ Amazing, what you found! --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 20:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
89560 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89559 +++$+++ 89559 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.308713940E09 +++$+++ Nothing amazing about it, and what I put into the article is only a small fraction of what I have found. I have to draw the line, for example, on how many articles on the Jan\xe1\u010dek Sinfonietta to include in the \"Further reading\" section\u2014there are dozens.\u2014 +++$+++ :Nothing amazing about it, and what I put into the article is only a small fraction of what I have found. I have to draw the line, for example, on how many articles on the Janáček Sinfonietta to include in the "Further reading" section—there are dozens.—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 20:39, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

13069 +++$+++ Dylanfromthenorth +++$+++ Mhym +++$+++ 13069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-04 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.288892100E09 +++$+++ Did you want to renominate the [[Daniel Biss]] article for deletion? If you want to let me know your deletion rationale I can fix the nomination for you.  +++$+++ Did you want to renominate the [[Daniel Biss]] article for deletion? If you want to let me know your deletion rationale I can fix the nomination for you. [[User:Dylanfromthenorth|Dylanfromthenorth]] ([[User talk:Dylanfromthenorth|talk]]) 10:35, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
13070 +++$+++ Dylanfromthenorth +++$+++ Mhym +++$+++ 13069 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.288942200E09 +++$+++ Ignore the above - he's notable now he's been elected and so clearly eligible for an article.  +++$+++ ::*Ignore the above - he's notable now he's been elected and so clearly eligible for an article. [[User:Dylanfromthenorth|Dylanfromthenorth]] ([[User talk:Dylanfromthenorth|talk]]) 00:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

275215 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Well looks like I shouldn't visit Canberra! The [http:\/\/www.dailyadvertiser.com.au\/news\/local\/news\/general\/olympians-to-visit-city-for-underwear-launch\/1724186.aspx local rag] says that they will be launching some undies but boy [http:\/\/www.dailytelegraph.com.au\/entertainment\/sydney-confidential\/stephanie-rice-and-eamon-sullivans-undies-tug-of-war\/story-e6frewz0-1225820982630 this headline] had me hooked until I read that they would only be captains.... Damn! :P 14:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ Well looks like I shouldn't visit Canberra! The [http://www.dailyadvertiser.com.au/news/local/news/general/olympians-to-visit-city-for-underwear-launch/1724186.aspx local rag] says that they will be launching some undies but boy [http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/sydney-confidential/stephanie-rice-and-eamon-sullivans-undies-tug-of-war/story-e6frewz0-1225820982630 this headline] had me hooked until I read that they would only be captains.... Damn! :P 14:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
275216 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275215 +++$+++ 275215 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.263977640E09 +++$+++ Hehehehe that Daily Tele headline is priceless! You should go along and join in the tug-of-war for Stephanie Rice's undies! Make sure you get some pictures - I wouldn't mind some pictures of Sullivan fighting a tug-of-war to keep his undies on! :p LOL  +++$+++ :Hehehehe that Daily Tele headline is priceless! You should go along and join in the tug-of-war for Stephanie Rice's undies! Make sure you get some pictures - I wouldn't mind some pictures of Sullivan fighting a tug-of-war to keep his undies on! :p LOL [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
275217 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275215 +++$+++ 275216 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.264397520E09 +++$+++ I'll be there shortly (though the press release say it's at 11:15am but just incase they are early)! Then tomorrow I'm looking at (leaving at 3am) heading to Canberra.  +++$+++ ::I'll be there shortly (though the press release say it's at 11:15am but just incase they are early)! Then tomorrow I'm looking at (leaving at 3am) heading to Canberra. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 21:32, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
275218 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275215 +++$+++ 275215 +++$+++ 2010-01-22 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.264163580E09 +++$+++ I request you refer to me by my name and not as \"ma'am\". Thank you. As to Sejan, are you trying to claim that his is a [[WP:N|notable]] Australian soccer player? Please read [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Lelo_Sejean]] and address that matters raised there regarding notability of this person and lack (non-existence) of [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] supporting the claims by you and your colleagues that this is a notable Australian soccer player. You say \"Considering no imediate evidence to this person's status, why must he not be eligible to have his name on the list\" - I'm sorry but that's not how it works here. We don't list people in the encyclopedia pending proof that they're not notable or that the information isn't true. We find evidence that they are notable and proof that the claims are true and ''then'' we add them. The [[WP:BLP|biographies of living people]] policy requires not only high quality sourcing for information pertaining to living persons but also places the responsibility for sourcing squarely on the person wanting to add the information. If you want to add this claim then you need to go and find some sources that are acceptable under the reliable sources guideline to support the claim that he is a notable soccer player. I do agree that the entire page needs to be cleaned up but I'm afraid that I don't have time to do it a present.  +++$+++ :I request you refer to me by my name and not as "ma'am". Thank you. As to Sejan, are you trying to claim that his is a [[WP:N|notable]] Australian soccer player? Please read [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lelo_Sejean]] and address that matters raised there regarding notability of this person and lack (non-existence) of [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] supporting the claims by you and your colleagues that this is a notable Australian soccer player. You say "Considering no imediate evidence to this person's status, why must he not be eligible to have his name on the list" - I'm sorry but that's not how it works here. We don't list people in the encyclopedia pending proof that they're not notable or that the information isn't true. We find evidence that they are notable and proof that the claims are true and ''then'' we add them. The [[WP:BLP|biographies of living people]] policy requires not only high quality sourcing for information pertaining to living persons but also places the responsibility for sourcing squarely on the person wanting to add the information. If you want to add this claim then you need to go and find some sources that are acceptable under the reliable sources guideline to support the claim that he is a notable soccer player. I do agree that the entire page needs to be cleaned up but I'm afraid that I don't have time to do it a present. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:33, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
275219 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275215 +++$+++ 275217 +++$+++ 2010-01-23 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.264261320E09 +++$+++ That's fine; you're welcome to start working on updating and verifying the list. Please do be careful to verify entries using only sources that qualify as \"reliable sources\" under the sourcing guideline, see [[WP:RS]] for information about what sources are acceptable. In general, newspaper and magazine articles are good, while blogs and forum posts are not. If you are not able to find a reliable published source to verify any entries, please remove them. The [[WP:BLP|Biographies of Living People policy]] requires quality sourcing to verify claims about living persons or the information should be removed. So if there are entries on that list that are not [[WP:N|notable]] persons or are not verifiable, they need to be removed. You will find more information on the reliable sources page and if you have any questions please feel free to ask me here on this page. Please also be careful to sign your messages by typing four [[tildes]] (<nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>)   +++$+++ :::That's fine; you're welcome to start working on updating and verifying the list. Please do be careful to verify entries using only sources that qualify as "reliable sources" under the sourcing guideline, see [[WP:RS]] for information about what sources are acceptable. In general, newspaper and magazine articles are good, while blogs and forum posts are not. If you are not able to find a reliable published source to verify any entries, please remove them. The [[WP:BLP|Biographies of Living People policy]] requires quality sourcing to verify claims about living persons or the information should be removed. So if there are entries on that list that are not [[WP:N|notable]] persons or are not verifiable, they need to be removed. You will find more information on the reliable sources page and if you have any questions please feel free to ask me here on this page. Please also be careful to sign your messages by typing four [[tildes]] (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>)  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 07:42, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

537360 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-01 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.157142240E09 +++$+++ Hi, do you, by any chance, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Latin_peoples&offset=20060901132034&action=history \"claim descent from the Ancient Romans\"]? If yes, follow this link to find out you were wrong... --  +++$+++ Hi, do you, by any chance, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latin_peoples&offset=20060901132034&action=history "claim descent from the Ancient Romans"]? If yes, follow this link to find out you were wrong... -- [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 13:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
537361 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537360 +++$+++ 537360 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.157143020E09 +++$+++ Really, in Tuscany we generally claim descent from the [[Etruscans]]... ;-)-- +++$+++ :Really, in Tuscany we generally claim descent from the [[Etruscans]]... ;-)--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 13:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

13074 +++$+++ Location +++$+++ Mhym +++$+++ 13074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-29 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.293635640E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Moses Bloom]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Moses Bloom|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Moses Bloom]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Moses Bloom|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Location|Location]] ([[User talk:Location|talk]]) 07:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
13075 +++$+++ Location +++$+++ Mhym +++$+++ 13074 +++$+++ 13074 +++$+++ 2010-12-29 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.293682920E09 +++$+++ FYI: At the above page I posted a source that appears to contradict that Bloom was the first Jewish mayor of a major American city. I imagine a lot of this is open to what a particular author thinks is \"major\".  +++$+++ :FYI: At the above page I posted a source that appears to contradict that Bloom was the first Jewish mayor of a major American city. I imagine a lot of this is open to what a particular author thinks is "major". [[User:Location|Location]] ([[User talk:Location|talk]]) 20:22, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

275220 +++$+++ Elpepsinator +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-23 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.264269480E09 +++$+++ thank you for drawing this to my attention.( +++$+++ thank you for drawing this to my attention.([[User:Elpepsinator|Elpepsinator]] ([[User talk:Elpepsinator|talk]]) 09:58, 23 January 2010 (UTC)) elpepsinator 20:58, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
275221 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275220 +++$+++ 275220 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.264322460E09 +++$+++ Please let me know here on my talk page if you think you can fix the article so it meets Wikipedia's inclusion rules and I will then put it in your userspace for you to work on until it's ready to move back into the encyclopedia.  +++$+++ :Please let me know here on my talk page if you think you can fix the article so it meets Wikipedia's inclusion rules and I will then put it in your userspace for you to work on until it's ready to move back into the encyclopedia. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

13078 +++$+++ Ruud Koot +++$+++ Mhym +++$+++ 13078 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-12 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.302664860E09 +++$+++ Please do not move pages by copying and pasting the contents. Try [[WP:RM]]. \u2014'' +++$+++ Please do not move pages by copying and pasting the contents. Try [[WP:RM]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 20:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
13079 +++$+++ Ruud Koot +++$+++ Mhym +++$+++ 13078 +++$+++ 13078 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.302665520E09 +++$+++ No, see e.g. [http:\/\/www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk\/Biographies\/Yushkevich.html]: \"Adolph Pavlovich Yushkevich was called Adolph Pavlovich throughout his life.\". Try [[WP:RM]] if you still disagree. \u2014'' +++$+++ : No, see e.g. [http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Yushkevich.html]: "Adolph Pavlovich Yushkevich was called Adolph Pavlovich throughout his life.". Try [[WP:RM]] if you still disagree. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 20:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

275225 +++$+++ HalfShadow +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275225 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-23 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.266914880E09 +++$+++ He's back as <span class=\"plainlinks\">[[User:70.50.200.246|70.50.200.246]] ([[User talk:70.50.200.246|talk]] \u2022 [[Special:Contributions\/70.50.200.246|contribs]] \u2022 [http:\/\/dnsstuff.com\/tools\/ipall\/?ip=70.50.200.246\/ info] \u2022 [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~chm\/whois.php?ip=70.50.200.246 WHOIS])<\/span><!-- {{ip|70.50.200.246}} -->  +++$+++ He's back as <span class="plainlinks">[[User:70.50.200.246|70.50.200.246]] ([[User talk:70.50.200.246|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/70.50.200.246|contribs]] • [http://dnsstuff.com/tools/ipall/?ip=70.50.200.246/ info] • [http://toolserver.org/~chm/whois.php?ip=70.50.200.246 WHOIS])</span><!-- {{ip|70.50.200.246}} --> [[User:HalfShadow|<font color="gray">'''Half'''</font>]][[User talk:HalfShadow|<font color="black">'''Shadow'''</font>]] 00:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
275226 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275225 +++$+++ 275225 +++$+++ 2010-02-23 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.266917340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. I've anon blocked that IP for two weeks but unfortunately he's coming in on at least two different Bell Sympatico ranges and my past experiences with trying to block disruptive people on that ISP have not been very positive. Hopefully he'll get the message and knock it off without too much blocking needed. No doubt that's wishful thinking though. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know. I've anon blocked that IP for two weeks but unfortunately he's coming in on at least two different Bell Sympatico ranges and my past experiences with trying to block disruptive people on that ISP have not been very positive. Hopefully he'll get the message and knock it off without too much blocking needed. No doubt that's wishful thinking though. :) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
275227 +++$+++ HalfShadow +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275225 +++$+++ 275226 +++$+++ 2010-02-23 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.266928680E09 +++$+++ Yeah, he seems to show up every couple of weeks or so. He doesn't quite seem to be all there mentally, a theme which seems to have picked up with new users over the last month or so.  +++$+++ ::Yeah, he seems to show up every couple of weeks or so. He doesn't quite seem to be all there mentally, a theme which seems to have picked up with new users over the last month or so. [[User:HalfShadow|<font color="gray">'''Half'''</font>]][[User talk:HalfShadow|<font color="black">'''Shadow'''</font>]] 04:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

570159 +++$+++ Greg_L +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-23 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.206259380E09 +++$+++ David, please see [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Delimitnum_revisited|this post]] in response to your recent proposal on Talk:MOSNUM. It pertains to a different issue.  +++$+++ David, please see [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Delimitnum_revisited|this post]] in response to your recent proposal on Talk:MOSNUM. It pertains to a different issue. [[User:Greg L|Greg L]] (''[[User_talk:Greg_L|my talk]])'' 01:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
570160 +++$+++ Greg_L +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570159 +++$+++ 570159 +++$+++ 2008-03-23 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.206266160E09 +++$+++ David, see my latest at Talk:MOSNUM. Regarding the \u201cGiB\u201d issue, there\u2019s no need to jump into that holy war and fight any battles. If you think the use of those IEC terms is ill-advised, it would be nice if you\u2019d let me know. I\u2019ll contact you when it\u2019s time for an up-or-down vote. You might also be thinking of any like-minded editors. There is a small, but very vocal and intransigent, group of editors who like the IEC units and that\u2019s the only reason one sees them used here on Wikipedia.  +++$+++ * David, see my latest at Talk:MOSNUM. Regarding the “GiB” issue, there’s no need to jump into that holy war and fight any battles. If you think the use of those IEC terms is ill-advised, it would be nice if you’d let me know. I’ll contact you when it’s time for an up-or-down vote. You might also be thinking of any like-minded editors. There is a small, but very vocal and intransigent, group of editors who like the IEC units and that’s the only reason one sees them used here on Wikipedia. [[User:Greg L|Greg L]] (''[[User_talk:Greg_L|my talk]])'' 02:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
570161 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570159 +++$+++ 570160 +++$+++ 2008-03-23 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.206266640E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 03:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

13084 +++$+++ DASHBot +++$+++ Mhym +++$+++ 13084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.309869960E09 +++$+++ Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:DASHBot|DASHBot]] ([[User talk:DASHBot|talk]]) 05:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
13085 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Scorpion prinz +++$+++ 13084 +++$+++ 13084 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.296021720E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing![[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  22:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

13086 +++$+++  +++$+++ Scorpion prinz +++$+++ 13086 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-07 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.297074540E09 +++$+++ What's wrong with the new format? Aside from it's [[WP:NOT|not yours]]? &ndash;''' +++$+++ What's wrong with the new format? Aside from it's [[WP:NOT|not yours]]? &ndash;'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">HTD</font>]]''' ([[Wikipedia talk:In the news/Archive 31#World Cup updates|<font color="#FFA500">ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.</font>]]) 02:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
13087 +++$+++ Scorpion_prinz +++$+++ Scorpion prinz +++$+++ 13086 +++$+++ 13086 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.297096320E09 +++$+++ A previous discussion on the old format has reached a consensus to retain it remember?-- +++$+++ :A previous discussion on the old format has reached a consensus to retain it remember?--[[User:Scorpion prinz|Scorpion prinz]] <sup>([[User talk:Scorpion prinz|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Scorpion_prinz|contribs]])</sup> 08:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
13088 +++$+++  +++$+++ Scorpion prinz +++$+++ 13086 +++$+++ 13087 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.297115460E09 +++$+++ That was like a year ago? Nevertheless the pages ''do'' really need an improvement. We can't put parties anywhere on the current setup, vacancies and representation for the IBP in the tables. &ndash;''' +++$+++ ::That was like a year ago? Nevertheless the pages ''do'' really need an improvement. We can't put parties anywhere on the current setup, vacancies and representation for the IBP in the tables. &ndash;'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">HTD</font>]]''' ([[Wikipedia talk:In the news/Archive 31#World Cup updates|<font color="#FFA500">ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.</font>]]) 13:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
13089 +++$+++  +++$+++ Scorpion prinz +++$+++ 13086 +++$+++ 13087 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.297211820E09 +++$+++ P.S.: Not to mention, lists such as [[Legislative districts of Cavite]] are really hard to follow. They are arranged via Congress reverse chronologically, then inside each section, they are arranged chronologically. The new setup avoids all of this by putting a notes column, and to point out that for example, most (if not all) Cebu's current 5th district was the 1st district pre-martial law. &ndash;''' +++$+++ ::P.S.: Not to mention, lists such as [[Legislative districts of Cavite]] are really hard to follow. They are arranged via Congress reverse chronologically, then inside each section, they are arranged chronologically. The new setup avoids all of this by putting a notes column, and to point out that for example, most (if not all) Cebu's current 5th district was the 1st district pre-martial law. &ndash;'''[[User:Howard the Duck|<font color="#FFA500">HTD</font>]]''' ([[Wikipedia talk:In the news/Archive 31#World Cup updates|<font color="#FFA500">ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.</font>]]) 16:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

395397 +++$+++ Striver +++$+++ Salman01 +++$+++ 395397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-30 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.151706660E09 +++$+++ Salman, reagarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Abu_Talib_ibn_Abd-al-Muttalib&diff=60354056&oldid=58744690 this], dont you agree that it is better to use \"-\" instead of \" \" in names, that is \"Abu-Talib\" rather than \"Abu Talib\", so that non-enlish people better see that it is a single name? -- +++$+++ Salman, reagarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abu_Talib_ibn_Abd-al-Muttalib&diff=60354056&oldid=58744690 this], dont you agree that it is better to use "-" instead of " " in names, that is "Abu-Talib" rather than "Abu Talib", so that non-enlish people better see that it is a single name? --[[User:Striver|Striver]] 15:31, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
395398 +++$+++ Striver +++$+++ Salman01 +++$+++ 395397 +++$+++ 395397 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.151725500E09 +++$+++ Thank you, i hope you are in the best health as well!. Well, regarding the name, i argue that it is better to try to focus on \"x ibn y\". When someone has a first name that goes \"a b c ibn x y z\", its makes it harder. For example, \"Abd al Mutalib ibn Abd al Uzzah\". Its very hard for a westerner to get that. Its beter to have that as \"a-b-c ibn z-y-z\", as in \"Abd-al-Mutalib ibn Abd-al-Uzzah\". Its still the correct tranliteration, but it makes it easier to read for western eyes. Peace. -- +++$+++ :Thank you, i hope you are in the best health as well!. Well, regarding the name, i argue that it is better to try to focus on "x ibn y". When someone has a first name that goes "a b c ibn x y z", its makes it harder. For example, "Abd al Mutalib ibn Abd al Uzzah". Its very hard for a westerner to get that. Its beter to have that as "a-b-c ibn z-y-z", as in "Abd-al-Mutalib ibn Abd-al-Uzzah". Its still the correct tranliteration, but it makes it easier to read for western eyes. Peace. --[[User:Striver|Striver]] 20:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
395399 +++$+++ Striver +++$+++ Salman01 +++$+++ 395397 +++$+++ 395398 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.151730600E09 +++$+++ Well, you corrected me with regards to \"binte\" being more correct, and im greatfull to you for that, but unfortunatly, i dont agree with you on this issue. Lets just [[Agree to disagree]]. Peace.-- +++$+++ ::Well, you corrected me with regards to "binte" being more correct, and im greatfull to you for that, but unfortunatly, i dont agree with you on this issue. Lets just [[Agree to disagree]]. Peace.--[[User:Striver|Striver]] 22:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

275233 +++$+++ theoneintraining +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-06 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.267865280E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah, regarding the above list, I would like the references in 2 colums instead of 1 long line of references. I know i've seen it done before I just can't remember how to do it. Any chance you could please help me out with this.-- +++$+++ Hi Sarah, regarding the above list, I would like the references in 2 colums instead of 1 long line of references. I know i've seen it done before I just can't remember how to do it. Any chance you could please help me out with this.--[[User:theoneintraining|<font color="grey">intraining</font>]] [[User talk:Theoneintraining|<font color="red"><sup>Jack In</sup></font>]] 00:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
275234 +++$+++ theoneintraining +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275233 +++$+++ 275233 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.267865520E09 +++$+++ Adding: eventually I will add a reference for every film, so I'm expecting there to be literally hundreds of references, do you have any suggestions of how to make it not so cluttered. What do you think of a Hide Box?(I think thats what they're called)-- +++$+++ :Adding: eventually I will add a reference for every film, so I'm expecting there to be literally hundreds of references, do you have any suggestions of how to make it not so cluttered. What do you think of a Hide Box?(I think thats what they're called)--[[User:theoneintraining|<font color="grey">intraining</font>]] [[User talk:Theoneintraining|<font color="red"><sup>Jack In</sup></font>]] 00:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
275235 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275233 +++$+++ 275234 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.267871280E09 +++$+++ Hello Mr Training. I'm glad to see you back at work! I had a look at the page but it looks like you've sorted out the reference section with <nowiki>{{reflist|2}}<\/nowiki>. Hmm, I'm not sure about making it less cluttered, it might be worth looking at other long lists with lots of references, maybe even some [[WP:FL|featured lists]] to see how they've managed lots of cites. It looks like most of the cites are IMDb pages, which as you probably know, isn't considered a great reference because it's a user generated site, if you end up taking it to feature list consideration, they may complain about that (I've never been involved with feature lists so I'm just speculating and not speaking from any special knowledge). If you do envision eventually getting it featured, it might be worth checking with one of the FL managers now to make sure they do accept IMDb for citations, before you spend heaps of time with IMDb cites. I have access to some private reference databases like Factiva and the Australian New Zealand Reference Centre, so if you have trouble finding suitable sources to use as references for any of them, let me know and I'll see if I can find any old newspaper or journal articles you can use. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Hello Mr Training. I'm glad to see you back at work! I had a look at the page but it looks like you've sorted out the reference section with <nowiki>{{reflist|2}}</nowiki>. Hmm, I'm not sure about making it less cluttered, it might be worth looking at other long lists with lots of references, maybe even some [[WP:FL|featured lists]] to see how they've managed lots of cites. It looks like most of the cites are IMDb pages, which as you probably know, isn't considered a great reference because it's a user generated site, if you end up taking it to feature list consideration, they may complain about that (I've never been involved with feature lists so I'm just speculating and not speaking from any special knowledge). If you do envision eventually getting it featured, it might be worth checking with one of the FL managers now to make sure they do accept IMDb for citations, before you spend heaps of time with IMDb cites. I have access to some private reference databases like Factiva and the Australian New Zealand Reference Centre, so if you have trouble finding suitable sources to use as references for any of them, let me know and I'll see if I can find any old newspaper or journal articles you can use. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:28, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
275236 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275233 +++$+++ 275234 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.267871280E09 +++$+++ One thing I just thought of trying is, you could use more than 2 columns. If you label the references so they're descriptive, instead of displaying the full URL, say \"''Nanking'' credits at IMDb\", I think they'd look much less cluttered and you could probably also even use four columns then. I just tried it with 3 and I personally think it looks better and less cluttered than with two columns but feel free to go back to 2 columns if you prefer that instead.  +++$+++ ::One thing I just thought of trying is, you could use more than 2 columns. If you label the references so they're descriptive, instead of displaying the full URL, say "''Nanking'' credits at IMDb", I think they'd look much less cluttered and you could probably also even use four columns then. I just tried it with 3 and I personally think it looks better and less cluttered than with two columns but feel free to go back to 2 columns if you prefer that instead. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:28, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
275237 +++$+++ theoneintraining +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275233 +++$+++ 275236 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.267876560E09 +++$+++ Is there any chance you can direct me to a particular discussion\/user\/admin that states IMDB is not realiable source, I work in the film industry I know for a fact that IMDB must only use content that is legal, meaning every movie IMDB has on their website has terms of copyright where the director and producer must be included in the credits everywhere that the film is mentioned; IMDB understands that and fully complys with all legal processes. IMDB is not user generated content as in the same terms as Wikipedia IMDB must clarify all information before posting on their website, only user reviews are subject to no filtered content.-- +++$+++ :::Is there any chance you can direct me to a particular discussion/user/admin that states IMDB is not realiable source, I work in the film industry I know for a fact that IMDB must only use content that is legal, meaning every movie IMDB has on their website has terms of copyright where the director and producer must be included in the credits everywhere that the film is mentioned; IMDB understands that and fully complys with all legal processes. IMDB is not user generated content as in the same terms as Wikipedia IMDB must clarify all information before posting on their website, only user reviews are subject to no filtered content.--[[User:theoneintraining|<font color="grey">intraining</font>]] [[User talk:Theoneintraining|<font color="red"><sup>Jack In</sup></font>]] 03:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
275238 +++$+++ theoneintraining +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275233 +++$+++ 275237 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.267876920E09 +++$+++ My credits include having a huge involvement in the matrix films, I have also worked in (and still do) many other studio productions.-- +++$+++ ::::My credits include having a huge involvement in the matrix films, I have also worked in (and still do) many other studio productions.--[[User:theoneintraining|<font color="grey">intraining</font>]] [[User talk:Theoneintraining|<font color="red"><sup>Jack In</sup></font>]] 04:02, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
275239 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275233 +++$+++ 275238 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.267899780E09 +++$+++ I don't really understand what you mean by the terms of copyright that mean the director and producer must be included in the credits and what it has to do with whether IMDb is a reliable source. I know they don't check all information - I have submitted corrections to film credits for my uncle that were from 60+ years ago in the early days of Australian film and television and not at all verifiable and they accepted them without question. I think some of the credit lists are probable reasonably accurate but I know there is a hell of a lot missing and I have found mistakes there myself, including people credited to similar named but different titles and people of similar names with their credits mixed up and an utter mess. For example, have a look at Debra Byrne's credit listing [http:\/\/uk.imdb.com\/name\/nm0126160\/] and you'll see they say she worked on UFO films and Australian Survivor but I have verified that with her personally and it's not true - it's another person called \"Debbie Byrne\"[http:\/\/uk.imdb.com\/name\/nm2335846\/] but IMDb have mixed up their credits and were notified about 5 years ago but still haven't got around to sorting it out. There's heaps of mistakes I've seen in their listings and you won't convince me that they're reliable, but as for Wikipedia policies and guidelines, I'm not sure where you would find previous discussions but I know there have been discussions about whether IMDb links should be used as citations and the general outcome from what I have seen is that it should only be used cautiously. In fact, come to think of it, I was recently pulled up myself by someone for using IMDb as a cite - [[User_talk:Sarah\/Archive20#Will_Patton]]. However, I don't have time to go looking for the discussions - perhaps you could ask one of the people that run the feature lists, or maybe SandyGeorgia who works on Feature Articles, if it's okay to base a film page exclusively or nearly exclusively on IMDb citations. If you don't care about getting it featured then it probably doesn't matter. My uncle was an AFI award winning actor and my cousin had a good part in Matrix Reloaded; did you work on that one?  +++$+++ :::::I don't really understand what you mean by the terms of copyright that mean the director and producer must be included in the credits and what it has to do with whether IMDb is a reliable source. I know they don't check all information - I have submitted corrections to film credits for my uncle that were from 60+ years ago in the early days of Australian film and television and not at all verifiable and they accepted them without question. I think some of the credit lists are probable reasonably accurate but I know there is a hell of a lot missing and I have found mistakes there myself, including people credited to similar named but different titles and people of similar names with their credits mixed up and an utter mess. For example, have a look at Debra Byrne's credit listing [http://uk.imdb.com/name/nm0126160/] and you'll see they say she worked on UFO films and Australian Survivor but I have verified that with her personally and it's not true - it's another person called "Debbie Byrne"[http://uk.imdb.com/name/nm2335846/] but IMDb have mixed up their credits and were notified about 5 years ago but still haven't got around to sorting it out. There's heaps of mistakes I've seen in their listings and you won't convince me that they're reliable, but as for Wikipedia policies and guidelines, I'm not sure where you would find previous discussions but I know there have been discussions about whether IMDb links should be used as citations and the general outcome from what I have seen is that it should only be used cautiously. In fact, come to think of it, I was recently pulled up myself by someone for using IMDb as a cite - [[User_talk:Sarah/Archive20#Will_Patton]]. However, I don't have time to go looking for the discussions - perhaps you could ask one of the people that run the feature lists, or maybe SandyGeorgia who works on Feature Articles, if it's okay to base a film page exclusively or nearly exclusively on IMDb citations. If you don't care about getting it featured then it probably doesn't matter. My uncle was an AFI award winning actor and my cousin had a good part in Matrix Reloaded; did you work on that one? [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
275240 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275233 +++$+++ 275239 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.267901160E09 +++$+++ I just quickly searched for IMDb mentions in project space and found [[Wikipedia:Citing_IMDb]], which was an attempt to approve IMDb as a reliable source for writing credits submitted by the WGA and ratings submitted by the MPAA but disputed for using \"the cast list, character names, the crew lists, release dates, company credits, awards, soundtrack listing, filming locations, technical specs, alternate titles, running times, and rating certifications\" but the proposal failed to gain consensus because people couldn't agree that any material there is a reliable. If you look at the RS Noticeboard archives there's been heaps of discussions [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Search?search=IMDb&prefix=Wikipedia%3AReliable+sources%2FNoticeboard&fulltext=Search+Reliable+sources+noticeboard+archives&fulltext=Search] I haven't looked at them, so I have no idea what they say. IMDb also accepted and hosted a hoax credit listing [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Zachary_Jaydon_%283rd_nomination%29&oldid=223495234] until we discovered it (it's since been deleted by them). Have a nice long weekend. :)   +++$+++ ::::::I just quickly searched for IMDb mentions in project space and found [[Wikipedia:Citing_IMDb]], which was an attempt to approve IMDb as a reliable source for writing credits submitted by the WGA and ratings submitted by the MPAA but disputed for using "the cast list, character names, the crew lists, release dates, company credits, awards, soundtrack listing, filming locations, technical specs, alternate titles, running times, and rating certifications" but the proposal failed to gain consensus because people couldn't agree that any material there is a reliable. If you look at the RS Noticeboard archives there's been heaps of discussions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=IMDb&prefix=Wikipedia%3AReliable+sources%2FNoticeboard&fulltext=Search+Reliable+sources+noticeboard+archives&fulltext=Search] I haven't looked at them, so I have no idea what they say. IMDb also accepted and hosted a hoax credit listing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zachary_Jaydon_%283rd_nomination%29&oldid=223495234] until we discovered it (it's since been deleted by them). Have a nice long weekend. :)  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:46, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

13090 +++$+++ TheCoffee +++$+++ Scorpion prinz +++$+++ 13090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-14 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.300150320E09 +++$+++ Here you go, uploaded to the Commons just for you. Administrators can view the file history of deleted images. By the way, are you interested at all in becoming an administrator? It would mean you can delete and protect pages, view history of deleted pages\/files, edit fully protected pages, and block users. You've been a great contributor, and if you think you can make good use of these powers I would be happy to nominate you at [[WP:RFA]].  +++$+++ Here you go, uploaded to the Commons just for you. Administrators can view the file history of deleted images. By the way, are you interested at all in becoming an administrator? It would mean you can delete and protect pages, view history of deleted pages/files, edit fully protected pages, and block users. You've been a great contributor, and if you think you can make good use of these powers I would be happy to nominate you at [[WP:RFA]]. [[User:TheCoffee|TheCoffee]] ([[User talk:TheCoffee|talk]]) 17:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
13091 +++$+++ Scorpion_prinz +++$+++ Scorpion prinz +++$+++ 13090 +++$+++ 13090 +++$+++ 2011-03-14 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.300168980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the immediate response and for the offer too. It's very tempting I just somehow feel it's not yet time, it's too much of a responsibility i can handle. :)-- +++$+++ :Thanks for the immediate response and for the offer too. It's very tempting I just somehow feel it's not yet time, it's too much of a responsibility i can handle. :)--[[User:Scorpion prinz|Scorpion prinz]] <sup>([[User talk:Scorpion prinz|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Scorpion_prinz|contribs]])</sup> 23:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

537380 +++$+++ Giano +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537380 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-05 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.157491380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your recent edit in WP-ANI. I'm going out for a walk now. as the attacks on my talk page, and comments on WP_ANI are starting to get to me.  However. I shall not loose my temper today so will not be banned - so I go for a walk. Thanks for your comments - it's nice when some-one one does not know says something nice.  +++$+++ Thanks for your recent edit in WP-ANI. I'm going out for a walk now. as the attacks on my talk page, and comments on WP_ANI are starting to get to me.  However. I shall not loose my temper today so will not be banned - so I go for a walk. Thanks for your comments - it's nice when some-one one does not know says something nice. [[User:Giano|Giano]] | [[User talk:Giano|talk]] 14:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
537381 +++$+++ Giano +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537380 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.157556960E09 +++$+++ I've replied on my talk page to your point, which does mot exclude you, and was not aimed at you - far from it. Ciao  +++$+++ ::I've replied on my talk page to your point, which does mot exclude you, and was not aimed at you - far from it. Ciao [[User:Giano|Giano]] | [[User talk:Giano|talk]] 08:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

537382 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537382 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-05 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.157506080E09 +++$+++ Hi, could you have a look at {{user|CRAZY SCIENTIST}}? He's a likely Mywayyy reincarnation, or at least someone with a very similar agenda. Revert-warring, 3RR, personal attacks (ask me about the Greek if you have difficulties), talkpage harrassment, the full monty. Good thing is, if he really isn't Mywayyy, he claims he has a stative IP, so your blocks will stick better... :-)  +++$+++ Hi, could you have a look at {{user|CRAZY SCIENTIST}}? He's a likely Mywayyy reincarnation, or at least someone with a very similar agenda. Revert-warring, 3RR, personal attacks (ask me about the Greek if you have difficulties), talkpage harrassment, the full monty. Good thing is, if he really isn't Mywayyy, he claims he has a stative IP, so your blocks will stick better... :-) [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 18:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
537383 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537382 +++$+++ 537382 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.157512380E09 +++$+++ Thanks, you're right. Honestly, I didn't even notice the account was that much older. There's also the IP which he claims is his, and which happens to be in a very similar range as Mywayyy's... Well, anyway, I've also put it up to RFCU, let's see what they say.  +++$+++ :Thanks, you're right. Honestly, I didn't even notice the account was that much older. There's also the IP which he claims is his, and which happens to be in a very similar range as Mywayyy's... Well, anyway, I've also put it up to RFCU, let's see what they say. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 20:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

454346 +++$+++  Jza84 +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-20 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.229806200E09 +++$+++ [[Talk:Leeds]] gets a couple of messages every few months. Three\/Four accounts joining up and agreeing with each other? I'd say thats quite clear [[WP:SPADE]] and [[WP:BRAIN]]. I would not be comfortable unblocking this account unless a checkuser request is completed first. <small>--<span style=\"font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;border:2px solid #A9A9A9;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ [[Talk:Leeds]] gets a couple of messages every few months. Three/Four accounts joining up and agreeing with each other? I'd say thats quite clear [[WP:SPADE]] and [[WP:BRAIN]]. I would not be comfortable unblocking this account unless a checkuser request is completed first. <small>--<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;border:2px solid #A9A9A9;padding:1px;">[[User:Jza84|<b>Jza84</b>]] | [[User_talk: Jza84|<font style="color:#000000;background:#D3D3D3;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 12:50, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
454347 +++$+++ fvw +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454346 +++$+++ 454346 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.229806320E09 +++$+++ Ehm, I wasn't so much implying as saying. You're an editor involved with the leeds article and blocking users that edit there. That's not kosher. -- +++$+++ :Ehm, I wasn't so much implying as saying. You're an editor involved with the leeds article and blocking users that edit there. That's not kosher. --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 12:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
454348 +++$+++  Jza84 +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454346 +++$+++ 454347 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.229806680E09 +++$+++ I'm not Jewish. But since when is that part of codified policy? So because I've passed a couple of comments and cited a few examples of other practice, if I spot a sockpuppet sharing the same space I can't block them? I think you think too low of me: if the puppet had happened to share a different point of view, say aligned with mine, they too would be blocked on sight. It's not a coi, it's commonsense. [[WP:AGF|Assume good faith]] perhaps? <small>--<span style=\"font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;border:2px solid #A9A9A9;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::I'm not Jewish. But since when is that part of codified policy? So because I've passed a couple of comments and cited a few examples of other practice, if I spot a sockpuppet sharing the same space I can't block them? I think you think too low of me: if the puppet had happened to share a different point of view, say aligned with mine, they too would be blocked on sight. It's not a coi, it's commonsense. [[WP:AGF|Assume good faith]] perhaps? <small>--<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;border:2px solid #A9A9A9;padding:1px;">[[User:Jza84|<b>Jza84</b>]] | [[User_talk: Jza84|<font style="color:#000000;background:#D3D3D3;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 12:58, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
454349 +++$+++ fvw +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454346 +++$+++ 454348 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.229806800E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Admin#Misuse_of_administrative_tools]]: ''Administrators should not use their tools to advantage, or in a content dispute (or article) where they are a party (or significant editor), or where a significant conflict of interest is likely to exist. With few specific exceptions where tool use is allowed by any admin, administrators should ensure they are reasonably neutral parties when they use the tools.'' -- +++$+++ :::[[Wikipedia:Admin#Misuse_of_administrative_tools]]: ''Administrators should not use their tools to advantage, or in a content dispute (or article) where they are a party (or significant editor), or where a significant conflict of interest is likely to exist. With few specific exceptions where tool use is allowed by any admin, administrators should ensure they are reasonably neutral parties when they use the tools.'' --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 13:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
454350 +++$+++ fvw +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454346 +++$+++ 454349 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.229806860E09 +++$+++ Oh, and while I'm citing anyway: [[Kosher#Broader_meaning]]: ''By extension, the broader sense of the word kosher has the meanings legitimate, acceptable, permissible, genuine, or authentic. '' -- +++$+++ ::::Oh, and while I'm citing anyway: [[Kosher#Broader_meaning]]: ''By extension, the broader sense of the word kosher has the meanings legitimate, acceptable, permissible, genuine, or authentic. '' --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 13:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
454351 +++$+++  Jza84 +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454346 +++$+++ 454350 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.229807400E09 +++$+++ {{ec}}The crux of the issue is that I haven't used the tools in bad faith to bias an outcome of a discussion, but rather blocked a couple of ill-meaning unwanted sockpuppets. Indeed, the master is still unblocked and may still voice his\/her opinion in a normal manner as permitted. The only advantage to be gained is by Wikipedia, not by me. The block is a ''reasonable'' measure. Look at the evidence. Look at the agreement with another administator. If you're unhappy with the obvious evidence, and want to unblock these sockpuppets and give them the all-clear that it is appropriate behavior that they can get away with, by all means file a check user request first please and prove me wrong (you're probably too involved now to unblock them per [[WP:WHEEL]]. Otherwise, I'm a content builder, not the type of user that wants to discuss motives and politics for eons whilst WP crumbles away. I look at the evidence and use the tools in good faith. I don't mind being challenged, but would prefer it in more contentious cases, not schoolboy sockpuppetry. <small>--<span style=\"font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;border:2px solid #A9A9A9;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :::::{{ec}}The crux of the issue is that I haven't used the tools in bad faith to bias an outcome of a discussion, but rather blocked a couple of ill-meaning unwanted sockpuppets. Indeed, the master is still unblocked and may still voice his/her opinion in a normal manner as permitted. The only advantage to be gained is by Wikipedia, not by me. The block is a ''reasonable'' measure. Look at the evidence. Look at the agreement with another administator. If you're unhappy with the obvious evidence, and want to unblock these sockpuppets and give them the all-clear that it is appropriate behavior that they can get away with, by all means file a check user request first please and prove me wrong (you're probably too involved now to unblock them per [[WP:WHEEL]]. Otherwise, I'm a content builder, not the type of user that wants to discuss motives and politics for eons whilst WP crumbles away. I look at the evidence and use the tools in good faith. I don't mind being challenged, but would prefer it in more contentious cases, not schoolboy sockpuppetry. <small>--<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;border:2px solid #A9A9A9;padding:1px;">[[User:Jza84|<b>Jza84</b>]] | [[User_talk: Jza84|<font style="color:#000000;background:#D3D3D3;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 13:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
454352 +++$+++ fvw +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454346 +++$+++ 454351 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.229807520E09 +++$+++ I've unblocked the user in question, if you feel they should be blocked please report them on the appropriate sockpuppet\/edit warrior\/vandal page. -- +++$+++ ::::::I've unblocked the user in question, if you feel they should be blocked please report them on the appropriate sockpuppet/edit warrior/vandal page. --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 13:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
454353 +++$+++  Jza84 +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454346 +++$+++ 454352 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.229807640E09 +++$+++ Double standards. Total breach of [[WP:WHEEL]]. I will block the master then, the rule is '''one user, one account'''. <small>--<span style=\"font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;border:2px solid #A9A9A9;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :::::::Double standards. Total breach of [[WP:WHEEL]]. I will block the master then, the rule is '''one user, one account'''. <small>--<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;border:2px solid #A9A9A9;padding:1px;">[[User:Jza84|<b>Jza84</b>]] | [[User_talk: Jza84|<font style="color:#000000;background:#D3D3D3;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 13:14, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

275241 +++$+++ Melbanian +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275241 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-12 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.268421240E09 +++$+++ Even if the \"non-fee\" permission template was correctly applied to Australian currency images it states that \"use on Wikipedia is contended to be fair use when they are used for the purposes of commentary or criticism relating to the image of the currency itself.\"  It is a fair comment relating to the image on the currency itself that the person represented went to a certain school.  Perhaps if you think the fair use rationale needs to be beefed-up in this situation you can make some sensible additional edits to the caption under the image (as it is used in the Scotch article) or the Scotch article itself.  This would be more helpful than just deleting and re-deleting the image.  Not many schools in Australia have alumni on our currency, so it is a relevant and notable thing to mention in a school article in the alumni section. I understand that Wiki policy also encourages the use of appropriately placed and relevant images that enlighten the text - this image certainly enlightens a reader about the notability of Scotch alumnus John Monash.   +++$+++ Even if the "non-fee" permission template was correctly applied to Australian currency images it states that "use on Wikipedia is contended to be fair use when they are used for the purposes of commentary or criticism relating to the image of the currency itself."  It is a fair comment relating to the image on the currency itself that the person represented went to a certain school.  Perhaps if you think the fair use rationale needs to be beefed-up in this situation you can make some sensible additional edits to the caption under the image (as it is used in the Scotch article) or the Scotch article itself.  This would be more helpful than just deleting and re-deleting the image.  Not many schools in Australia have alumni on our currency, so it is a relevant and notable thing to mention in a school article in the alumni section. I understand that Wiki policy also encourages the use of appropriately placed and relevant images that enlighten the text - this image certainly enlightens a reader about the notability of Scotch alumnus John Monash.  [[User:Melbanian|Melbanian]] ([[User talk:Melbanian|talk]]) 11:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
275242 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275241 +++$+++ 275241 +++$+++ 2010-03-12 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.268437620E09 +++$+++ The photograph at [[:File:100_Australian_dollars_back.jpg]] has been sourced from a page with a very clear copyright notice on it and the website's copyright policy is pretty clear that they assert copyright over all their material and only allow re-use conditionally and under certain circumstances ([http:\/\/www.rba.gov.au\/copyright\/index.html RBA website copyright policy]). The copyright of the photograph belongs to the Reserve Bank and I see no evidence at all that the Reserve Bank has released their images into the public domain, as you say, or under any other free license compatible with Wikipedia's licensing. Separate from the issue of this individual photograph, use and creation of images of Australia's banknotes is rather restricted under the Crimes (Currency) Act of 1981. Images of Australian banknotes are inherently encumbered with legal restrictions governing the types and quality of images that can be created, the way they can be used and their modification, so they do not meet Wikipedia's \"free content\" policy of being \"perpetually free content for unlimited distribution, modification and application by all users in all media\". And this particular image is a non-free copyright image so can only used as permitted under our non-free content rules. The NFCC is one of our key policies and one of very few policies that find their source in a resolution passed by the Wikimedia Foundation's board. Wikipedia's mission is to create a free, copyright free, unrestricted encyclopedia that can be used by anyone for any purpose, so we use content with legal restrictions very sparingly and our policy goes further than the law because of our mission. The non-free content policy requires that \"non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.\" This image is really only tangentially related to Scotch College and it does not \"significantly increase readers' understanding\" the subject of the school so it's not appropriate - or necessary - to use the image in this manner. You can certainly mention in the article that Monash appeared on the banknote and you can link to the image, but it's not appropriate to use the image on that article. Are you the IP {{User|203.34.29.4}}? I'm very concerned with the way you are editing over this issue and you're risking being blocked by continuing reverting back a non-free image that an administrator or experienced editor is clearly trying to remove under a core policy like the non-free content policy.  +++$+++ :The photograph at [[:File:100_Australian_dollars_back.jpg]] has been sourced from a page with a very clear copyright notice on it and the website's copyright policy is pretty clear that they assert copyright over all their material and only allow re-use conditionally and under certain circumstances ([http://www.rba.gov.au/copyright/index.html RBA website copyright policy]). The copyright of the photograph belongs to the Reserve Bank and I see no evidence at all that the Reserve Bank has released their images into the public domain, as you say, or under any other free license compatible with Wikipedia's licensing. Separate from the issue of this individual photograph, use and creation of images of Australia's banknotes is rather restricted under the Crimes (Currency) Act of 1981. Images of Australian banknotes are inherently encumbered with legal restrictions governing the types and quality of images that can be created, the way they can be used and their modification, so they do not meet Wikipedia's "free content" policy of being "perpetually free content for unlimited distribution, modification and application by all users in all media". And this particular image is a non-free copyright image so can only used as permitted under our non-free content rules. The NFCC is one of our key policies and one of very few policies that find their source in a resolution passed by the Wikimedia Foundation's board. Wikipedia's mission is to create a free, copyright free, unrestricted encyclopedia that can be used by anyone for any purpose, so we use content with legal restrictions very sparingly and our policy goes further than the law because of our mission. The non-free content policy requires that "non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." This image is really only tangentially related to Scotch College and it does not "significantly increase readers' understanding" the subject of the school so it's not appropriate - or necessary - to use the image in this manner. You can certainly mention in the article that Monash appeared on the banknote and you can link to the image, but it's not appropriate to use the image on that article. Are you the IP {{User|203.34.29.4}}? I'm very concerned with the way you are editing over this issue and you're risking being blocked by continuing reverting back a non-free image that an administrator or experienced editor is clearly trying to remove under a core policy like the non-free content policy. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 15:47, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

537386 +++$+++ LUCPOL +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-07 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.157684220E09 +++$+++ See: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALUCPOL&diff=74356985&oldid=74318429], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABabuBhatt&diff=74345979&oldid=71515400], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Maxcap&diff=prev&oldid=74344784],  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHans_Schwarc&diff=74342083&oldid=74134152] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AInkington&diff=74382445&oldid=74358950], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:LUCPOL&diff=prev&oldid=74383063]. This is vandalism from Egr. Or what? Please block him.  +++$+++ See: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALUCPOL&diff=74356985&oldid=74318429], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABabuBhatt&diff=74345979&oldid=71515400], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Maxcap&diff=prev&oldid=74344784],  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHans_Schwarc&diff=74342083&oldid=74134152] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AInkington&diff=74382445&oldid=74358950], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LUCPOL&diff=prev&oldid=74383063]. This is vandalism from Egr. Or what? Please block him. [[User:LUCPOL|LUCPOL]] 19:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
537387 +++$+++ LUCPOL +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537386 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-08 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.157753100E09 +++$+++ Don't believe to Egr. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALUCPOL&diff=74356985&oldid=74318429], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABabuBhatt&diff=74345979&oldid=71515400], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Maxcap&diff=prev&oldid=74344784],  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHans_Schwarc&diff=74342083&oldid=74134152] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AInkington&diff=74382445&oldid=74358950], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:LUCPOL&diff=prev&oldid=74383063]. This is vandalism from Egr.  +++$+++ ::Don't believe to Egr. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALUCPOL&diff=74356985&oldid=74318429], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABabuBhatt&diff=74345979&oldid=71515400], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Maxcap&diff=prev&oldid=74344784],  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHans_Schwarc&diff=74342083&oldid=74134152] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AInkington&diff=74382445&oldid=74358950], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LUCPOL&diff=prev&oldid=74383063]. This is vandalism from Egr. [[User:LUCPOL|LUCPOL]] 15:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
537388 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537386 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-08 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.157754000E09 +++$+++ For the moment I won't do anything, as [[rapcore]] is protected and a double [[WP:RCU]] has been made. After the awnsers, I'll see what can be done.-- +++$+++ :::For the moment I won't do anything, as [[rapcore]] is protected and a double [[WP:RCU]] has been made. After the awnsers, I'll see what can be done.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 15:20, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
537389 +++$+++ Alphachimp +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537386 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-08 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.157755380E09 +++$+++ I've blocked the obvious sock and reverted this page (LUCPOL blanked the talk section). I'll also hold off on anything until RFCU is done.  +++$+++ ::::I've blocked the obvious sock and reverted this page (LUCPOL blanked the talk section). I'll also hold off on anything until RFCU is done. [[User:Alphachimp|<font color="OrangeRed">alpha</font><font color="black">'''Chimp'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Alphachimp|(talk)]]</sup> 15:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
537390 +++$+++ LUCPOL +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537386 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-08 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.157756760E09 +++$+++ I retreat my notification, you reverted my edits - your issue. I to mean well.  +++$+++ :::::I retreat my notification, you reverted my edits - your issue. I to mean well. [[User:LUCPOL|LUCPOL]] 16:06, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

13099 +++$+++ Merkabatribe +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13099 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-30 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.301512680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Merkabatribe|Merkabatribe]] ([[User talk:Merkabatribe|talk]]) 12:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
13100 +++$+++ Ukexpat +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13099 +++$+++ 13099 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.301519160E09 +++$+++ That's not the way we do it when there are only two relevant articles, see [[WP:DISAMBIGUATION]].&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp; +++$+++ :That's not the way we do it when there are only two relevant articles, see [[WP:DISAMBIGUATION]].&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 14:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

275245 +++$+++ HalfShadow +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-22 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.269242160E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Ni_Hao,_Kai-Lan_episodes&diff=prev&oldid=351251087 Again].  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Ni_Hao,_Kai-Lan_episodes&diff=prev&oldid=351251087 Again]. [[User:HalfShadow|<font color="gray">'''Half'''</font>]][[User talk:HalfShadow|<font color="black">'''Shadow'''</font>]] 00:16, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
275246 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275245 +++$+++ 275245 +++$+++ 2010-03-22 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.269251220E09 +++$+++ I've blocked that IP for a month, but since he's on Bell Sympatico, it probably isn't going to be very effective. I noticed that  +++$+++ :I've blocked that IP for a month, but since he's on Bell Sympatico, it probably isn't going to be very effective. I noticed that [[User:Thomas]] signed into his account a couple of days ago and blanked his talk page. I just had a look through his edits and I'm certain the IP isn't him - User:Thomas seems to be an adult, interested in financial, health and French-related subjects while our friend is obviously a kid into kids shows. I guess we can expect to seem him back same time next month. 8\ [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:47, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

13103 +++$+++ BetHillel +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13103 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-30 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.301547000E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:BetHillel|BetHillel]] ([[User talk:BetHillel|talk]]) 21:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
13104 +++$+++ Ravpapa +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13103 +++$+++ 13103 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.301611200E09 +++$+++ Sorry for horning in. I just wanted to say that if you know Ronn Torossian personally, as you suggest, you might want to refrain from editing the articles about him and about 5WPR, to avoid a conflict of interest. HOwever, if you have sources (reliable ones, of course) that say that Torossian has mellowed in the last three years, and today has a less aggressive and more conventional PR style, I would be glad to see them and to include them in the story. I searched for such references myself, but could find none. Thanks for your help, -- +++$+++ :Sorry for horning in. I just wanted to say that if you know Ronn Torossian personally, as you suggest, you might want to refrain from editing the articles about him and about 5WPR, to avoid a conflict of interest. HOwever, if you have sources (reliable ones, of course) that say that Torossian has mellowed in the last three years, and today has a less aggressive and more conventional PR style, I would be glad to see them and to include them in the story. I searched for such references myself, but could find none. Thanks for your help, --[[User:Ravpapa|Ravpapa]] ([[User talk:Ravpapa|talk]]) 15:40, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
13105 +++$+++ 199.19.186.9 +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13103 +++$+++ 13104 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.301806680E09 +++$+++ Appreciate commentary on Torossian page and realize sockpuppets may have existed but that doesnt allow a biased living person bio.  Torossian is prominent due to PR work and his bio should be reflected as such.  Even Israel work is extremely biased (with blog references, his website used inaccurately reflecting Elon as a client which doesnt appear as client on site, and negative Rabbi comments only). Bad user behavior doesnt mean a BLP is punished because of it. Wikipedia shouldnt be about that. [[Special:Contributions\/199.19.186.9|199.19.186.9]] ( +++$+++ ::Appreciate commentary on Torossian page and realize sockpuppets may have existed but that doesnt allow a biased living person bio.  Torossian is prominent due to PR work and his bio should be reflected as such.  Even Israel work is extremely biased (with blog references, his website used inaccurately reflecting Elon as a client which doesnt appear as client on site, and negative Rabbi comments only). Bad user behavior doesnt mean a BLP is punished because of it. Wikipedia shouldnt be about that. [[Special:Contributions/199.19.186.9|199.19.186.9]] ([[User talk:199.19.186.9|talk]]) 21:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
13106 +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13103 +++$+++ 13105 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.301807400E09 +++$+++ I really don't know who I'm talking to here.  You folks would make things so much easier if the account hopping would stop.  At this point, with the article protected, there is no strategic advantage to using multiple accounts.  +++$+++ :::I really don't know who I'm talking to here.  You folks would make things so much easier if the account hopping would stop.  At this point, with the article protected, there is no strategic advantage to using multiple accounts. [[User:The Interior|<font color="brown">The</font><font color="green"> Interior</font>]] [[User Talk:The Interior|(Talk)]] 22:10, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

537393 +++$+++ AIUI +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-09 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.157809140E09 +++$+++ The \"Republic of Macedonia\" is recognized with that name in United States or in Russia. But in Europe the state is supposed to be \"Former Yugoslavic Republic of Macedonia\". Although you are from Europe, you dont seem to support the european POV. Why?   +++$+++ The "Republic of Macedonia" is recognized with that name in United States or in Russia. But in Europe the state is supposed to be "Former Yugoslavic Republic of Macedonia". Although you are from Europe, you dont seem to support the european POV. Why?  [[User:AIUI|AIUI]] 06:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
537394 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537393 +++$+++ 537393 +++$+++ 2006-09-09 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.157846220E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but I have to correct you: Italy, Germany, France and UK all use RoM, and the media simply \"Macedonia\". As for Telex being my sock, if you look the edit histories, we've been often in dispute. But I would love it to be true; I would be a super-linguist freak with knowledge of Italian, English, French, Greek, Albanian, Bulgarian and Macedonian.-- +++$+++ :Sorry, but I have to correct you: Italy, Germany, France and UK all use RoM, and the media simply "Macedonia". As for Telex being my sock, if you look the edit histories, we've been often in dispute. But I would love it to be true; I would be a super-linguist freak with knowledge of Italian, English, French, Greek, Albanian, Bulgarian and Macedonian.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
537395 +++$+++ AIUI +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537393 +++$+++ 537394 +++$+++ 2006-09-09 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.157851980E09 +++$+++ [[EU]]'s [[decision]] is that this state should be called [[FYROM]]. Of course a small minority of EU states disagree, but, [[AIUI]], they should be forced to obey to the decision of the majority, shouldnt they? Are you against the decisions made by the EU [[Legislature]] and you think that EU people (like you and me) should decide instead, are you in favor of the legistrature's decisions EXCEPT this one, or are you finnaly an advocate of [[Anti-Europeanism]]?  +++$+++ :: [[EU]]'s [[decision]] is that this state should be called [[FYROM]]. Of course a small minority of EU states disagree, but, [[AIUI]], they should be forced to obey to the decision of the majority, shouldnt they? Are you against the decisions made by the EU [[Legislature]] and you think that EU people (like you and me) should decide instead, are you in favor of the legistrature's decisions EXCEPT this one, or are you finnaly an advocate of [[Anti-Europeanism]]? [[User:AIUI|AIUI]] 18:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

275250 +++$+++ JJJ999 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-01 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.270119300E09 +++$+++ You seem to be following my edits (like Canberra HS).  It would be nice if I didn't need to feel you were stalking me thanks. +++$+++ You seem to be following my edits (like Canberra HS).  It would be nice if I didn't need to feel you were stalking me thanks.[[User:JJJ999|JJJ999]] ([[User talk:JJJ999|talk]]) 03:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
275251 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275250 +++$+++ 275250 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.270120380E09 +++$+++ Excuse me?! Editing an article four days after you does not equal stalking! I'm an administrator and you came to my attention through my activities as an administrator. It's not stalking, or unusual, for an administrator to look at the contributions of someone they've encountered and become very concerned about while working as an administrator. I'm very concerned with the way you behave on Wikipedia, your ownership of articles and your manner of dealing with other editors, highlighted, ironically, by your post here on my talk page.   +++$+++ :Excuse me?! Editing an article four days after you does not equal stalking! I'm an administrator and you came to my attention through my activities as an administrator. It's not stalking, or unusual, for an administrator to look at the contributions of someone they've encountered and become very concerned about while working as an administrator. I'm very concerned with the way you behave on Wikipedia, your ownership of articles and your manner of dealing with other editors, highlighted, ironically, by your post here on my talk page.  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
275252 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275250 +++$+++ 275250 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.270133820E09 +++$+++ What about a [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~chm\/whois.php?ip=58.165.32.231 ACT IP] address making it's first edit by editing [[Victoria University of Wellington Debating Society]] 2 mins after an admin [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Victoria_University_of_Wellington_Debating_Society&diff=prev&oldid=353099483 did] ?  +++$+++ : What about a [http://toolserver.org/~chm/whois.php?ip=58.165.32.231 ACT IP] address making it's first edit by editing [[Victoria University of Wellington Debating Society]] 2 mins after an admin [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Victoria_University_of_Wellington_Debating_Society&diff=prev&oldid=353099483 did] ? [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 07:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

537396 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537396 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-09 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.157853000E09 +++$+++ Um... Aldux. Out of all EU member states (this includes ''La Repubblica Italiana''), only the government of Poland fully recognizes the name \"Republic of Macedonia\". -- +++$+++ Um... Aldux. Out of all EU member states (this includes ''La Repubblica Italiana''), only the government of Poland fully recognizes the name "Republic of Macedonia". --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 18:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
537397 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537396 +++$+++ 537396 +++$+++ 2006-09-09 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.157858400E09 +++$+++ Oops, my sock has promptly corrected me ;-) Since Italy in the [[CEI]] uses \"Macedonia\" instead of Former Republic ecc., I thought this was the norm, since I'd never heard an Italian politician use FYROM, nor is it ever used by Italian, French and British media (can't read German). Anyway, awnsering AIUI, FYROM, or more exactly the long form, is only used in EU-RoM relations; but in bilateral relations everybody is free to use the name they prefer; as the name used in the ONU isn't binding for the single members, so is the case of the EU. Also (but not very important), I doubt there was a vote of the Europarliament on the issue; this was probably decided by the commission, with an accord between Greece and RoM.-- +++$+++ :Oops, my sock has promptly corrected me ;-) Since Italy in the [[CEI]] uses "Macedonia" instead of Former Republic ecc., I thought this was the norm, since I'd never heard an Italian politician use FYROM, nor is it ever used by Italian, French and British media (can't read German). Anyway, awnsering AIUI, FYROM, or more exactly the long form, is only used in EU-RoM relations; but in bilateral relations everybody is free to use the name they prefer; as the name used in the ONU isn't binding for the single members, so is the case of the EU. Also (but not very important), I doubt there was a vote of the Europarliament on the issue; this was probably decided by the commission, with an accord between Greece and RoM.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 20:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
537398 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537396 +++$+++ 537397 +++$+++ 2006-09-09 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.157859240E09 +++$+++ Yes, Aldux, but the EU exclussively uses the name 'FYROM' in every paper, and no EU member state (apart from Poland, which entered just 2 years ago) has formaly recognised that country as 'Macedonia'. also, have in mind that the media (Greek, Italian, French, English, German-i cannot read all those languages, but i can understand some words) usually call the USA simply as 'America', the US president simply as the 'American President', US Senate simply as the 'American Senate', a US aircraft-carrier simply as 'an american aircraft-carrier', not to mention that the people of the USA self-identify simply as 'Americans'...! However, i doubt if anyone would like to mess here in Wikipedia with all the Canadian, Brazilian, Mexican et cetera editors, by changing every reference to 'USA' into the term 'America'. In the case of FYROM, however, there has been a monopolisation of the name!... even in the cases were this state is not recognised by this term (international organizations, bileteral relations with countries who still recognise it as FYROM, etc)...  +++$+++ ::Yes, Aldux, but the EU exclussively uses the name 'FYROM' in every paper, and no EU member state (apart from Poland, which entered just 2 years ago) has formaly recognised that country as 'Macedonia'. also, have in mind that the media (Greek, Italian, French, English, German-i cannot read all those languages, but i can understand some words) usually call the USA simply as 'America', the US president simply as the 'American President', US Senate simply as the 'American Senate', a US aircraft-carrier simply as 'an american aircraft-carrier', not to mention that the people of the USA self-identify simply as 'Americans'...! However, i doubt if anyone would like to mess here in Wikipedia with all the Canadian, Brazilian, Mexican et cetera editors, by changing every reference to 'USA' into the term 'America'. In the case of FYROM, however, there has been a monopolisation of the name!... even in the cases were this state is not recognised by this term (international organizations, bileteral relations with countries who still recognise it as FYROM, etc)... [[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 20:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

275254 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-03 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.270313700E09 +++$+++ I am sorry for roleing back your change to Debaters Association of Victoria, it was a mistake, and did not spot it for a while.  +++$+++ I am sorry for roleing back your change to Debaters Association of Victoria, it was a mistake, and did not spot it for a while. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 09:55, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
275255 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275254 +++$+++ 275254 +++$+++ 2010-04-04 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.270375980E09 +++$+++ No problems; I didn't even notice it myself. :)  +++$+++ :No problems; I didn't even notice it myself. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
275256 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275254 +++$+++ 275255 +++$+++ 2010-04-04 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.270404480E09 +++$+++ I was having a bad keyboard\/mouse day yesterday ! - Back to the subject of the various Debate articles, please don't take my wish to try and [[WP:PRESERVE]] as a reason not to take an article to AfD if you feel that is the best for WP.  +++$+++ :: I was having a bad keyboard/mouse day yesterday ! - Back to the subject of the various Debate articles, please don't take my wish to try and [[WP:PRESERVE]] as a reason not to take an article to AfD if you feel that is the best for WP. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 11:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
275257 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275254 +++$+++ 275256 +++$+++ 2010-04-05 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.270458960E09 +++$+++ Thanks Codf1977, I'm quite happy with the direction the pages have gone in - thank you for all the work you have done in that regard. My primary concern when I got involved after the ANI report was to try to ensure all this non-compliant material is cleaned up and the union issue finally resolved and I think that has been achieved with redirecting to a central page, so I'm happy for it to remain as is, but I just wanted to make it clear to JJJ that I feel he's lucky to end up with a redirect and a section on a parent page because the alternative isn't him keeping the article in his preferred version, but outright deletion. If he comes back from his block and starts edit warring over the redirect or causing other problems with it, I'll take it to AFD then but otherwise I'm quite happy with how things are at present. :) Incidentally, you mentioned in one of your comments that you wanted to keep the article behind the redirect so it can be used if the union becomes notable in future; if you ever want a copy of an article that has been deleted for that reason, just let me know and I'll be happy to get it for you. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Thanks Codf1977, I'm quite happy with the direction the pages have gone in - thank you for all the work you have done in that regard. My primary concern when I got involved after the ANI report was to try to ensure all this non-compliant material is cleaned up and the union issue finally resolved and I think that has been achieved with redirecting to a central page, so I'm happy for it to remain as is, but I just wanted to make it clear to JJJ that I feel he's lucky to end up with a redirect and a section on a parent page because the alternative isn't him keeping the article in his preferred version, but outright deletion. If he comes back from his block and starts edit warring over the redirect or causing other problems with it, I'll take it to AFD then but otherwise I'm quite happy with how things are at present. :) Incidentally, you mentioned in one of your comments that you wanted to keep the article behind the redirect so it can be used if the union becomes notable in future; if you ever want a copy of an article that has been deleted for that reason, just let me know and I'll be happy to get it for you. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:16, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
275258 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275254 +++$+++ 275257 +++$+++ 2010-04-05 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.270478040E09 +++$+++ No thank you for all you work.  +++$+++ :::: No thank you for all you work. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 07:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

13113 +++$+++ We hope +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-03 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.301893380E09 +++$+++ This is my first time at review-sorry if I blew it.  The article passes just fine--what do I do at DYK to indicate that?  +++$+++ This is my first time at review-sorry if I blew it.  The article passes just fine--what do I do at DYK to indicate that? [[User:We hope|We hope]] ([[User talk:We hope|talk]]) 22:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
13114 +++$+++ We hope +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13113 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.301894520E09 +++$+++ Went back--noted and checked it as ready to roll--wasn't sure if I was supposed to do that or not.  The only time I've been involved before with DYK was when someone nominated a BLP I expanded.  +++$+++ ::Went back--noted and checked it as ready to roll--wasn't sure if I was supposed to do that or not.  The only time I've been involved before with DYK was when someone nominated a BLP I expanded. [[User:We hope|We hope]] ([[User talk:We hope|talk]]) 22:22, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

275259 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275259 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-11 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.271032980E09 +++$+++ I have moved the ADF page to \"[[School debating in Australia]]\", have had a bit of writers block with regard to the lead, so anything you can add go on - I will revisit it tomorrow. I have updated the redirects as well.  +++$+++ I have moved the ADF page to "[[School debating in Australia]]", have had a bit of writers block with regard to the lead, so anything you can add go on - I will revisit it tomorrow. I have updated the redirects as well. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 17:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
275260 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275259 +++$+++ 275259 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.271351280E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'll have a look when I have some time. I'm in Berlin at the moment representing Wikimedia Australia at the Wikimedia chapters meeting so probably won't be around much over the next week or so. The hotel has pretty decent internet access though so when I have some time I'll pop over and have a look at the article. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Okay, I'll have a look when I have some time. I'm in Berlin at the moment representing Wikimedia Australia at the Wikimedia chapters meeting so probably won't be around much over the next week or so. The hotel has pretty decent internet access though so when I have some time I'll pop over and have a look at the article. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
275261 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275259 +++$+++ 275260 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.271352180E09 +++$+++ Lucky you - no problem.  +++$+++ :: Lucky you - no problem. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 10:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

13117 +++$+++ Philippe (WMF) +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-08 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.302248220E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Chzz&diff=prev&oldid=422942903 this edit].   +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chzz&diff=prev&oldid=422942903 this edit].  [[User:Philippe (WMF)|Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Philippe (WMF)|talk]]) 00:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
13118 +++$+++ Jalexander +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13117 +++$+++ 13117 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.302248340E09 +++$+++ I second this! +++$+++ : I second this![[User:Jalexander|Jalexander]]--WMF 00:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
13119 +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13117 +++$+++ 13118 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.302248460E09 +++$+++ Thanks guys, sorry I've been falling behind on my assignees.  I'm sending out a bunch of emails tonight.  +++$+++ ::Thanks guys, sorry I've been falling behind on my assignees.  I'm sending out a bunch of emails tonight. [[User:The Interior|<font color="brown">The</font><font color="green"> Interior</font>]] [[User Talk:The Interior|(Talk)]] 00:41, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

275262 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-15 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.271357040E09 +++$+++ Cheers  +++$+++ Cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 11:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
275263 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275262 +++$+++ 275262 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.271369580E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sats. Spent the afternoon wandering around Berlin with Andrew. We went to [[St. Mary's Church, Berlin]] which is amazing, and now getting ready to go off to a dinner with the WMF developers and chapter reps. Catch up soon. :)  +++$+++ :Thanks Sats. Spent the afternoon wandering around Berlin with Andrew. We went to [[St. Mary's Church, Berlin]] which is amazing, and now getting ready to go off to a dinner with the WMF developers and chapter reps. Catch up soon. :) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 15:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

275264 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-28 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.272450120E09 +++$+++ Welcome back, lucky that Iceland volcano (I can't spell it let alone trying to pronouncing it! lol) didn't keep erupting, last thing you would have want is to be stuck! I visited Canberra for Anzac Day and was in a good spot, only if the media wasn't in the way!  +++$+++ Welcome back, lucky that Iceland volcano (I can't spell it let alone trying to pronouncing it! lol) didn't keep erupting, last thing you would have want is to be stuck! I visited Canberra for Anzac Day and was in a good spot, only if the media wasn't in the way! [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 03:22, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
275265 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275264 +++$+++ 275264 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.272452640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the welcome back, Bidgee. :) We were actually stuck there, but I had planned to stay for a few days after the meeting so it didn't end up affecting me. A lot of the people attending were affected though and some didn't even make it to Berlin - poor Jimbo was stranded in transit! Wikimedia Deutschland were extremely kind and generous and they put everyone up in a hotel until the flying restrictions were lifted. Berlin is such a fascinating city, I honestly wouldn't have been disappointed if I'd been stranded there! Glad you had a successful trip to Canberra, but shame about the media - they do have an annoying habit of getting in the way! By the way, you know you can apply for a small grant for Wiki(p\/m)edia work? You should have applied for your Canberra trip if you were taking pictures for Commons. If you have further projects like that or need any camera gear\/books\/library subscriptions etc, put in an application. They're only small grants (up to $100 for the trial period) but there's not many opportunities to get some free money for Wikipedia\/WMF work and any money is better than none! Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks for the welcome back, Bidgee. :) We were actually stuck there, but I had planned to stay for a few days after the meeting so it didn't end up affecting me. A lot of the people attending were affected though and some didn't even make it to Berlin - poor Jimbo was stranded in transit! Wikimedia Deutschland were extremely kind and generous and they put everyone up in a hotel until the flying restrictions were lifted. Berlin is such a fascinating city, I honestly wouldn't have been disappointed if I'd been stranded there! Glad you had a successful trip to Canberra, but shame about the media - they do have an annoying habit of getting in the way! By the way, you know you can apply for a small grant for Wiki(p/m)edia work? You should have applied for your Canberra trip if you were taking pictures for Commons. If you have further projects like that or need any camera gear/books/library subscriptions etc, put in an application. They're only small grants (up to $100 for the trial period) but there's not many opportunities to get some free money for Wikipedia/WMF work and any money is better than none! Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
275266 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275264 +++$+++ 275265 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.272453720E09 +++$+++ Welcome back (just did a commons trip yesterday - got some beauties) - trust you havent got the lurgie that the other oz traveller alledges that he has :)  +++$+++ ::Welcome back (just did a commons trip yesterday - got some beauties) - trust you havent got the lurgie that the other oz traveller alledges that he has :) [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 04:22, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
275267 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275264 +++$+++ 275266 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.272453960E09 +++$+++ (EC)Lucky you had planned the time, but I guess always good to have an reason to stay a little longer. ;) Still haven't made a dint in photography of Canberra, I thought I would get 1 page of to do's done but only done half a page in two days (public holiday on Monday didn't help nor does the limited day light), was a last minute decision to go to Canberra for Anzac Day but looking at trying to get a flash for the DSLR (the one on the camera is rather poor). Not sure when I'll return to Canberra as I have a Point Cook trip coming up in about 7 weeks time. One photo I'm very happy to get (and totally unplanned) was a close up of [[:File:Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston AC, AFC.jpg|Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston AC, AFC]]., I'm yet to process the other photos (I'm now shooting in RAW (.PEF) again as I have more memory cards and for the higher [[Dots per inch|DPI]] then shooting in .jpg).  +++$+++ :::(EC)Lucky you had planned the time, but I guess always good to have an reason to stay a little longer. ;) Still haven't made a dint in photography of Canberra, I thought I would get 1 page of to do's done but only done half a page in two days (public holiday on Monday didn't help nor does the limited day light), was a last minute decision to go to Canberra for Anzac Day but looking at trying to get a flash for the DSLR (the one on the camera is rather poor). Not sure when I'll return to Canberra as I have a Point Cook trip coming up in about 7 weeks time. One photo I'm very happy to get (and totally unplanned) was a close up of [[:File:Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston AC, AFC.jpg|Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston AC, AFC]]., I'm yet to process the other photos (I'm now shooting in RAW (.PEF) again as I have more memory cards and for the higher [[Dots per inch|DPI]] then shooting in .jpg). [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 04:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
275268 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275264 +++$+++ 275267 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.272462660E09 +++$+++ Bidgee or Sats, could one of you fellows do me a favour and rename this picture - [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Berlin2.jpg] to \"Sarah Ewart-Berlin2.jpg\". I forgot to change the name when uploading it and it's not a good idea to leave it where it is since it's not actually a picture of Berlin. I'm going to upload full sizes of the pictures next week, My internet has been slowed for the rest of the month so I don't want to sit here for an hour uploading a picture but wanted to use it on the WM AU site. I don't seem to be able to move pictures on Commons - at least, I can't find a button for it. Thanks guys.  +++$+++ ::::Bidgee or Sats, could one of you fellows do me a favour and rename this picture - [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Berlin2.jpg] to "Sarah Ewart-Berlin2.jpg". I forgot to change the name when uploading it and it's not a good idea to leave it where it is since it's not actually a picture of Berlin. I'm going to upload full sizes of the pictures next week, My internet has been slowed for the rest of the month so I don't want to sit here for an hour uploading a picture but wanted to use it on the WM AU site. I don't seem to be able to move pictures on Commons - at least, I can't find a button for it. Thanks guys. [[User:Sarah|Sarah]] ([[User talk:Sarah|talk]]) 06:51, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
275269 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275264 +++$+++ 275268 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.272468360E09 +++$+++ Renamed. I think only Administrators and Bureaucrats have the right to move files.  +++$+++ :::::Renamed. I think only Administrators and Bureaucrats have the right to move files. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 08:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
275270 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275264 +++$+++ 275269 +++$+++ 2010-04-29 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.272562140E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, Bidgee. Much appreciated.  +++$+++ ::::::Thank you very much, Bidgee. Much appreciated. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

13122 +++$+++  +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Nell 19:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ Nell 19:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
13123 +++$+++ Ponyo +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13122 +++$+++ 13122 +++$+++ 2011-04-20 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.303356780E09 +++$+++ Nell, there is no \"someone else's concern\" when it comes to Wikipedia, the fact that you still believe that there is shows that you either have not read, or fail to comprehend, [[WP:OWN]].-- +++$+++ :Nell, there is no "someone else's concern" when it comes to Wikipedia, the fact that you still believe that there is shows that you either have not read, or fail to comprehend, [[WP:OWN]].--[[User:Ponyo|<b><font color="Navy">''Jezebel's''</font></b><font color="Navy">Ponyo</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 20:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

537411 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-17 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.158561360E09 +++$+++ Another sock of Cretanpride? Note [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Homosexuality_in_ancient_Greece&diff=76306528&oldid=76256400 this diff].  +++$+++ Another sock of Cretanpride? Note [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Homosexuality_in_ancient_Greece&diff=76306528&oldid=76256400 this diff]. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 23:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
537412 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537411 +++$+++ 537411 +++$+++ 2006-09-18 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.158568860E09 +++$+++ Yep.  It's [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser\/Case\/Cretanpride|confirmed]].  Are you getting as tired of playing whack-a-mole as I am? \u2014 +++$+++ :Yep.  It's [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Cretanpride|confirmed]].  Are you getting as tired of playing whack-a-mole as I am? —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 01:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
537413 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537411 +++$+++ 537412 +++$+++ 2006-09-18 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.158619440E09 +++$+++ By the way, who is the editor you referred to as facing a community ban? \u2014 +++$+++ ::By the way, who is the editor you referred to as facing a community ban? —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 15:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
537414 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537411 +++$+++ 537413 +++$+++ 2006-09-18 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.158631920E09 +++$+++ Ah.  I agree that there's more unpleasantness around in general these days. I'm afraid that my own response to the current level of vitriol is to tune out of \"Wikipolitics\" and try to focus on the articles I care about.  Unfortunately, this means that I pay less attention than I should to important pages like AN\/I, just because I don't want to get sucked in to these debates.  It's probably rather irresponsible of me as an administrator, but I'd rather tend my own garden than slog through an overgrown field and risk poison ivy.  (How ridiculous a metaphor is that?!) \u2014 +++$+++ :::Ah.  I agree that there's more unpleasantness around in general these days. I'm afraid that my own response to the current level of vitriol is to tune out of "Wikipolitics" and try to focus on the articles I care about.  Unfortunately, this means that I pay less attention than I should to important pages like AN/I, just because I don't want to get sucked in to these debates.  It's probably rather irresponsible of me as an administrator, but I'd rather tend my own garden than slog through an overgrown field and risk poison ivy.  (How ridiculous a metaphor is that?!) —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 19:12, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
537415 +++$+++ Johnbibby +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537411 +++$+++ 537414 +++$+++ 2006-09-18 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.158639240E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::[[User:Johnbibby|Johnbibby]] 21:14, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
537416 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537411 +++$+++ 537411 +++$+++ 2006-09-18 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.158641160E09 +++$+++ I've controlled carefully, and Galloway only speaks of oil '''in the region''', not Darfur; and it's well known to everybody there's oil is in southern Sudan. As for the article citated in the blog, it never mentions Darfur.-- +++$+++ :I've controlled carefully, and Galloway only speaks of oil '''in the region''', not Darfur; and it's well known to everybody there's oil is in southern Sudan. As for the article citated in the blog, it never mentions Darfur.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:46, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

13127 +++$+++ Jespah +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-11 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.305124740E09 +++$+++ JohninDC approved that link. -- +++$+++ JohninDC approved that link. --[[User:Jespah|Jespah]] ([[User talk:Jespah|talk]]) 07:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
13128 +++$+++ JohnInDC +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13127 +++$+++ 13127 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.305144240E09 +++$+++ Well, I said it wasn't inherently improper.  And it didn't seem, to me, to be excessive.  But I can see how another editor might view the addition of yet another list of Prendergast appearances as too much.   +++$+++ :Well, I said it wasn't inherently improper.  And it didn't seem, to me, to be excessive.  But I can see how another editor might view the addition of yet another list of Prendergast appearances as too much.  [[User:JohnInDC|JohnInDC]] ([[User talk:JohnInDC|talk]]) 13:04, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
13129 +++$+++ Jespah +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13127 +++$+++ 13128 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.305168780E09 +++$+++ In that case, who wins? -- +++$+++ ::In that case, who wins? --[[User:Jespah|Jespah]] ([[User talk:Jespah|talk]]) 19:53, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
13130 +++$+++ JohnInDC +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13127 +++$+++ 13129 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.305223020E09 +++$+++ Take up the issue on the Talk page.  But by and large, Jespah, given your unceasing propensity for over-linking and promotional fluff, I would tend to side with editors who are inclined to take it out.   +++$+++ :::Take up the issue on the Talk page.  But by and large, Jespah, given your unceasing propensity for over-linking and promotional fluff, I would tend to side with editors who are inclined to take it out.  [[User:JohnInDC|JohnInDC]] ([[User talk:JohnInDC|talk]]) 10:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
13131 +++$+++ Jespah +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13127 +++$+++ 13130 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.305259200E09 +++$+++ Really - no need to be rude.  Find your remark a bit peculiar since you approved it prior to another editor's removal of link. It is just this sort of comment that makes involvement with wikipedia so stressful and unpleasant. --[[User:Jespah|Jespah]] ([[User talk:Jespah|talk]]) 21:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ ::::Really - no need to be rude.  Find your remark a bit peculiar since you approved it prior to another editor's removal of link. It is just this sort of comment that makes involvement with wikipedia so stressful and unpleasant. --[[User:Jespah|Jespah]] ([[User talk:Jespah|talk]]) 21:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[[User:Jespah|Jespah]] ([[User talk:Jespah|talk]]) 21:00, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
13132 +++$+++ JohnInDC +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13127 +++$+++ 13131 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.305261120E09 +++$+++ I apologize for seeming rude.  I am just - disappointed that these issues keep coming up and coming up.  And, please.  I didn't \"approve\" it.  I said it wasn't improper, and in fact warned that it might appear promotional.  It didn't offend me particularly, but as I said, if another editor is bothered by it, it will be hard for me to defend it.   +++$+++ :::::I apologize for seeming rude.  I am just - disappointed that these issues keep coming up and coming up.  And, please.  I didn't "approve" it.  I said it wasn't improper, and in fact warned that it might appear promotional.  It didn't offend me particularly, but as I said, if another editor is bothered by it, it will be hard for me to defend it.  [[User:JohnInDC|JohnInDC]] ([[User talk:JohnInDC|talk]]) 21:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
13133 +++$+++ Jespah +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13127 +++$+++ 13132 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.305262020E09 +++$+++ Thank you. -- +++$+++ ::::::Thank you. --[[User:Jespah|Jespah]] ([[User talk:Jespah|talk]]) 21:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

537418 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-20 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.158795660E09 +++$+++ Hey, Aldux.  I'd like your opinion on whether {{user|GreekEconomist}} (formerly {{user|\u039c\u03ad\u03b3\u03b1\u03c2 \u0391\u03bb\u03ad\u03be\u03b1\u03bd\u03b4\u03c1\u03bf\u03c2}}) is Cretanpride or not.  Cretanpride, of course, had previously used the sock {{user|MegasAllexandros}}.  The GreekEconomist account hasn't edited much in Cretanpride's usual haunts \u2014 most of its edits were about Greek musicians \u2014 except for a few comments at [[Talk:Alexander the Great]], which didn't touch on Cretanpride's homophobic obsessions.  The question is how likely it is that two different Greeks from California, with the same ISP, would choose a username based on \"Alexander the Great\".  It doesn't seem impossible to me, but Mackensen thinks it's \"blazingly obvious\".  I've been fooled by Cretanpride before, so I don't really trust my judgement on this one.  What do you think? \u2014 +++$+++ Hey, Aldux.  I'd like your opinion on whether {{user|GreekEconomist}} (formerly {{user|Μέγας Αλέξανδρος}}) is Cretanpride or not.  Cretanpride, of course, had previously used the sock {{user|MegasAllexandros}}.  The GreekEconomist account hasn't edited much in Cretanpride's usual haunts — most of its edits were about Greek musicians — except for a few comments at [[Talk:Alexander the Great]], which didn't touch on Cretanpride's homophobic obsessions.  The question is how likely it is that two different Greeks from California, with the same ISP, would choose a username based on "Alexander the Great".  It doesn't seem impossible to me, but Mackensen thinks it's "blazingly obvious".  I've been fooled by Cretanpride before, so I don't really trust my judgement on this one.  What do you think? —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 16:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
537419 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537418 +++$+++ 537418 +++$+++ 2006-09-20 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.158801840E09 +++$+++ That makes sense, especially with the explanation of the range.  I also see that Clearwire, the ISP used by both GreekEconomist and many of Cretan's socks, has [http:\/\/www.clearwire.com\/store\/service_areas.php fairly limited coverage] in the United States, which makes the coincidence even more improbable. Do you want to do the honors, or shall I? \u2014 +++$+++ :That makes sense, especially with the explanation of the range.  I also see that Clearwire, the ISP used by both GreekEconomist and many of Cretan's socks, has [http://www.clearwire.com/store/service_areas.php fairly limited coverage] in the United States, which makes the coincidence even more improbable. Do you want to do the honors, or shall I? —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 18:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
537420 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537418 +++$+++ 537419 +++$+++ 2006-09-20 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.158807000E09 +++$+++ By the way, what exactly do you mean by \"a thorough control of the edits\"?  (If you'd rather not reveal the methodology in public, where Cretan can read it, feel free to email me.) \u2014 +++$+++ ::By the way, what exactly do you mean by "a thorough control of the edits"?  (If you'd rather not reveal the methodology in public, where Cretan can read it, feel free to email me.) —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 19:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
537421 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537418 +++$+++ 537420 +++$+++ 2006-09-20 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.158809820E09 +++$+++ Ah!  Well spotted.  I would never have noticed those connections.  On to the next round, I suppose... \u2014 +++$+++ :::Ah!  Well spotted.  I would never have noticed those connections.  On to the next round, I suppose... —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 20:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
537422 +++$+++ Mangojuice +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537418 +++$+++ 537418 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.158867060E09 +++$+++ Hey -- I've looked into this, and I actually find the evidence very unconvincing, so I unblocked GreekEconomist (see my remark on the user talk page for a thorough explanation).  The Greek community (I'm not greek, but I know many of them) is very tight-knit, and I wouldn't be surprised if they settle in specific locations in large concentrations.  In other words, I think all of this is explained by one coincidence: that there is another greek user in the same local area; the rest makes a lot of sense.  Alexander the Great has got to be a very common choice for a handle.   +++$+++ :Hey -- I've looked into this, and I actually find the evidence very unconvincing, so I unblocked GreekEconomist (see my remark on the user talk page for a thorough explanation).  The Greek community (I'm not greek, but I know many of them) is very tight-knit, and I wouldn't be surprised if they settle in specific locations in large concentrations.  In other words, I think all of this is explained by one coincidence: that there is another greek user in the same local area; the rest makes a lot of sense.  Alexander the Great has got to be a very common choice for a handle.  [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 12:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

275275 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-30 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.272612660E09 +++$+++ Try cf the two http:\/\/www.fcci.gov.ae\/supreme_council.htm] and http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:Sarah_Ewart-055.jpg   +++$+++ Try cf the two http://www.fcci.gov.ae/supreme_council.htm] and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sarah_Ewart-055.jpg  [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 00:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
275276 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275275 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-30 09:27:00 +++$+++ 1.272644820E09 +++$+++ It was just a feeling, just seems more like the type of clothing (probably the wrong word for it) the UAE Royals or Government officials would wear.  +++$+++ ::::It was just a feeling, just seems more like the type of clothing (probably the wrong word for it) the UAE Royals or Government officials would wear. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 09:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
275277 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275275 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-30 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.272652560E09 +++$+++ Saudi officials are also commonly seen in similar attire  +++$+++ :::::Saudi officials are also commonly seen in similar attire [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 11:36, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
275278 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275275 +++$+++ 275275 +++$+++ 2010-04-29 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.272606600E09 +++$+++ Please first try to discuss your concerns with the administrator who deleted the articles (or the editor who tagged them if there are any that haven't been deleted yet). In the case of Carlos Sieburger, the deleting administrator was  +++$+++ :Please first try to discuss your concerns with the administrator who deleted the articles (or the editor who tagged them if there are any that haven't been deleted yet). In the case of Carlos Sieburger, the deleting administrator was [[User:Nihonjoe|Nihonjoe]]. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 22:50, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

13134 +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-14 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.305420360E09 +++$+++ Jespah, if you need to communicate with me about content issues, please use the article talk page.  I will respond there. Next time you post here, I will simply delete your message.  This is not proper use of a person's talk page, and frankly, I'm getting tired of it. John, thanks for replying in my absence.  +++$+++ Jespah, if you need to communicate with me about content issues, please use the article talk page.  I will respond there. Next time you post here, I will simply delete your message.  This is not proper use of a person's talk page, and frankly, I'm getting tired of it. John, thanks for replying in my absence. [[User:The Interior|<font color="brown">The</font><font color="green"> Interior</font>]] [[User Talk:The Interior|(Talk)]] 17:46, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
13135 +++$+++ Jespah +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13134 +++$+++ 13134 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.305438480E09 +++$+++ All you had to do is nicely ask me, as I was unaware of yet another rule.  Frankly, I am very tried of your offensive attitude.  For the second time, I ask that you please refrain from editing my work, as you create an extremely stressful and unpleasant atmosphere; there are an abundance of editors who can take your place. I ask again, please stop!  If you are a nice person, you will. -- +++$+++ :All you had to do is nicely ask me, as I was unaware of yet another rule.  Frankly, I am very tried of your offensive attitude.  For the second time, I ask that you please refrain from editing my work, as you create an extremely stressful and unpleasant atmosphere; there are an abundance of editors who can take your place. I ask again, please stop!  If you are a nice person, you will. --[[User:Jespah|Jespah]] ([[User talk:Jespah|talk]]) 22:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
13136 +++$+++ JohnInDC +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13134 +++$+++ 13135 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.305452640E09 +++$+++ I think it's just a prescription for heartache to take Wikipedia editing tussles personally.  Some people are of course more pleasant to deal with than others, but in my own experience The Interior is nowhere near the ugly end of the spectrum.  Again Jespah, if having your work criticized or reworked causes you stress then you should stop editing.  Or at the very least make a more devoted study of the policies and principles that guide the place so that your work is more likely to fall within them.  If you are able to do that then over time you will find that other editors will pretty much leave you alone.  Indeed in that regard you really should take something from the fact that in *all* of the many discussions, spread across many pages concerning your edits and style, not one other editor has consistently taken your side of things - sooner or later, every experienced editor concludes that you're unwilling, or unable, to edit independently and responsibly.  I am trying to be nice about this, rather than rude, but there is no altogether pleasant way of saying that if there is a problem here, it is almost entirely of your making - and, for that reason, almost entirely your responsibility to correct.   +++$+++ ::I think it's just a prescription for heartache to take Wikipedia editing tussles personally.  Some people are of course more pleasant to deal with than others, but in my own experience The Interior is nowhere near the ugly end of the spectrum.  Again Jespah, if having your work criticized or reworked causes you stress then you should stop editing.  Or at the very least make a more devoted study of the policies and principles that guide the place so that your work is more likely to fall within them.  If you are able to do that then over time you will find that other editors will pretty much leave you alone.  Indeed in that regard you really should take something from the fact that in *all* of the many discussions, spread across many pages concerning your edits and style, not one other editor has consistently taken your side of things - sooner or later, every experienced editor concludes that you're unwilling, or unable, to edit independently and responsibly.  I am trying to be nice about this, rather than rude, but there is no altogether pleasant way of saying that if there is a problem here, it is almost entirely of your making - and, for that reason, almost entirely your responsibility to correct.  [[User:JohnInDC|JohnInDC]] ([[User talk:JohnInDC|talk]]) 02:44, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
13137 +++$+++ Jespah +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13134 +++$+++ 13134 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.305454920E09 +++$+++ My remark was not directed at you.  I don't appreciate your intrusion.  How you perceive \"The Insider\" and  how I do - how he treats you and how he treats me are entirely different.  So, please, don't tell me what you don't understand.  Additionally, it is not editing of my work that is upsetting, it is the way in which some editors address me.  Perhaps you will consider editing someone else as well. -- +++$+++ :My remark was not directed at you.  I don't appreciate your intrusion.  How you perceive "The Insider" and  how I do - how he treats you and how he treats me are entirely different.  So, please, don't tell me what you don't understand.  Additionally, it is not editing of my work that is upsetting, it is the way in which some editors address me.  Perhaps you will consider editing someone else as well. --[[User:Jespah|Jespah]] ([[User talk:Jespah|talk]]) 03:22, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
13138 +++$+++ JohnInDC +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13134 +++$+++ 13137 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.305456720E09 +++$+++ The very first word of your very first post on this Talk page is my *name*; so please don't now try to tell me I'm not involved here.  I am trying to offer useful advice, Jespah.  It is the same advice that you have received from almost every other editor who has come into contact with you:  Namely, learn your way around Wikipedia -- and stop trying to press your own agenda.  Blaming others for your travails here is not going to end them.  I'm sorry if my directness puts you off but suggestions and hints have not had the desired effect, and to be honest, I'm tired of thinking up circumlocutions and other ways of softening the point.   +++$+++ ::The very first word of your very first post on this Talk page is my *name*; so please don't now try to tell me I'm not involved here.  I am trying to offer useful advice, Jespah.  It is the same advice that you have received from almost every other editor who has come into contact with you:  Namely, learn your way around Wikipedia -- and stop trying to press your own agenda.  Blaming others for your travails here is not going to end them.  I'm sorry if my directness puts you off but suggestions and hints have not had the desired effect, and to be honest, I'm tired of thinking up circumlocutions and other ways of softening the point.  [[User:JohnInDC|JohnInDC]] ([[User talk:JohnInDC|talk]]) 03:52, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
13139 +++$+++ JohnInDC +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13134 +++$+++ 13138 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.305456780E09 +++$+++ (And apologies to The Interior for hijacking his Talk page while he's on Wikibreak.  If it continues any longer, we'll move it.)   +++$+++ :::(And apologies to The Interior for hijacking his Talk page while he's on Wikibreak.  If it continues any longer, we'll move it.)  [[User:JohnInDC|JohnInDC]] ([[User talk:JohnInDC|talk]]) 03:53, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
13140 +++$+++ Jespah +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13134 +++$+++ 13138 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.305459240E09 +++$+++ You are not involved when I direct a comment to someone else.  You don't seem to understand that editors do not have to be rude when commenting.  That has nothing to do with my knowledge of Wikipedia.  We are not talking now about my contributions.  So, please.  -- +++$+++ :::You are not involved when I direct a comment to someone else.  You don't seem to understand that editors do not have to be rude when commenting.  That has nothing to do with my knowledge of Wikipedia.  We are not talking now about my contributions.  So, please.  --[[User:Jespah|Jespah]] ([[User talk:Jespah|talk]]) 04:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

275279 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275279 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-30 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.272644340E09 +++$+++ Hi Sarah (or anyone else watching this talk page ;)), What are your thoughts on the use of flags on a list[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tropical_monsoon_climate&diff=359164240&oldid=358986211]?  +++$+++ Hi Sarah (or anyone else watching this talk page ;)), What are your thoughts on the use of flags on a list[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tropical_monsoon_climate&diff=359164240&oldid=358986211]? [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 09:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
275280 +++$+++ Gnangarra +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275279 +++$+++ 275279 +++$+++ 2010-04-30 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.272649560E09 +++$+++ [[MOS:FLAG]] doesnt really cover this, as the article isnt about political boundaries but climatic regions the flags really dont contribute any value to the information.  +++$+++ :[[MOS:FLAG]] doesnt really cover this, as the article isnt about political boundaries but climatic regions the flags really dont contribute any value to the information. [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 10:46, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
275281 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275279 +++$+++ 275280 +++$+++ 2010-04-30 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.272652500E09 +++$+++ WP Indonesia - every now and then merbabu goes elastic at the flag obsessives who inhabit wp indonesia space :|  +++$+++ ::WP Indonesia - every now and then merbabu goes elastic at the flag obsessives who inhabit wp indonesia space :| [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 11:35, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
275282 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275279 +++$+++ 275279 +++$+++ 2010-05-03 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.272909900E09 +++$+++ For what it's worth, Bidgee, I don't like flags being used like that and I think it violates the Icons section (which does say that it also applies to the flags) on the MOS:FLAG page. The Icons section of the page says that while they can be used decoratively, they shouldn't be used purely \"because they look good\" and that \"Icons should serve an encyclopaedic purpose other than decoration\". The flags at the diff you posted above really seem to serve no purpose but decoration and I cannot see any reasonable purpose for their usage there - encyclopedic or otherwise - except purely decoration, especially on a page like that where the list isn't even about the ''countries'' represented by the flags but ''cities''. So I agree with your removing them (but it's not something I think is worth getting into a fight over!)  +++$+++ :For what it's worth, Bidgee, I don't like flags being used like that and I think it violates the Icons section (which does say that it also applies to the flags) on the MOS:FLAG page. The Icons section of the page says that while they can be used decoratively, they shouldn't be used purely "because they look good" and that "Icons should serve an encyclopaedic purpose other than decoration". The flags at the diff you posted above really seem to serve no purpose but decoration and I cannot see any reasonable purpose for their usage there - encyclopedic or otherwise - except purely decoration, especially on a page like that where the list isn't even about the ''countries'' represented by the flags but ''cities''. So I agree with your removing them (but it's not something I think is worth getting into a fight over!) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

275283 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-30 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.272685920E09 +++$+++ A note to let you know that I have unblocked {{User1|Himalayan Academy Publications}}, who you username-blocked, and who has requested unblock in order to change username to ''Satyanatha''. Regards,  +++$+++ A note to let you know that I have unblocked {{User1|Himalayan Academy Publications}}, who you username-blocked, and who has requested unblock in order to change username to ''Satyanatha''. Regards, [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 20:52, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
275284 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275283 +++$+++ 275283 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.272840900E09 +++$+++ ...and the CHU has been actioned.  +++$+++ :...and the CHU has been actioned. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 15:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
275285 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275283 +++$+++ 275284 +++$+++ 2010-05-03 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.272908760E09 +++$+++ No problems. Thanks for letting me know, John. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::No problems. Thanks for letting me know, John. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
275286 +++$+++ Gwillhickers +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275283 +++$+++ 275284 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.275964740E09 +++$+++ Hello Sarah, Bzuk's digression here is also telling, as the party who removed the image had no edit history and made no \"development of the article\".  Also, bear in mind that the [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Telephone_Centennial_Issue_1976-13c.jpg image] in question was removed without any discussion first and was done so, not because of its content, but because of its national origin, with the claim that it automatically violated NPOV simply because there was one other US stamp image on the page. This is a rather spurious claim at best because the entire 'Bell article, like many others, could have been written by one author, from one country, using images from that same country, while maintaining NPOV.  Including the image in question would not have rendered the 'neutrality' of the page in the fashion the other few users, (curiously all with long edit histories in decidedly British\/Canadian subjects) have claimed. Also telling is the fact that none of the other users have even attempted to articulate the NPOV point and only made vague reference to its title.  ie.There is nothing in NPOV that states that there must be an equal number of images from different countries to maintain NPOV.  The inclusion of one more 'American image' can not and has not amounted to any NPOV violation.  Had the dispute been handled by a formal mediation and was decided in my favor I would have at that point declined to include the image, as I would not want to use it as a battering ram, rendering it as an object of scorn and contempt. Again, none of this was discussed before the image was removed.  +++$+++ ::Hello Sarah, Bzuk's digression here is also telling, as the party who removed the image had no edit history and made no "development of the article".  Also, bear in mind that the [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Telephone_Centennial_Issue_1976-13c.jpg image] in question was removed without any discussion first and was done so, not because of its content, but because of its national origin, with the claim that it automatically violated NPOV simply because there was one other US stamp image on the page. This is a rather spurious claim at best because the entire 'Bell article, like many others, could have been written by one author, from one country, using images from that same country, while maintaining NPOV.  Including the image in question would not have rendered the 'neutrality' of the page in the fashion the other few users, (curiously all with long edit histories in decidedly British/Canadian subjects) have claimed. Also telling is the fact that none of the other users have even attempted to articulate the NPOV point and only made vague reference to its title.  ie.There is nothing in NPOV that states that there must be an equal number of images from different countries to maintain NPOV.  The inclusion of one more 'American image' can not and has not amounted to any NPOV violation.  Had the dispute been handled by a formal mediation and was decided in my favor I would have at that point declined to include the image, as I would not want to use it as a battering ram, rendering it as an object of scorn and contempt. Again, none of this was discussed before the image was removed. [[User:Gwillhickers|GWillHickers]] ([[User talk:Gwillhickers|talk]]) 19:39, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
275287 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275283 +++$+++ 275286 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.276000860E09 +++$+++ None of these points make any difference and an editor doesn't have to contribute \"development of the article\" in order to participate in deciding on usage of an image. Wikipedia welcomes contributions from new users so it really doesn't matter if they have \"no edit history\" or not; that is completely irrelevant. We do not decide things here according to who has the best or most extensive edit history, we decide based on strength of arguments. That's why in discussions (like AFDs, for example) you can have ten people voting one way and all you need is one person to come a long and make a strong policy-based argument for the closure to go against the majority. So none of these points you're raising are relevant or justify the edit warring. The bottom line here is: you should never edit war over your own images. There's no way around that and no possible excuse or justification for doing so. If you add an image to an article and another editor removes it, take it to the talk pages but don't keep restoring it yourself. If you post to the talk page and you're in the right, other editors will restore the image for you, keeping your hands \"clean\". I think you're a bit confused about mediation - mediation isn't a court case and no one issues a judgment that \"decides in your favour\", rather it is a process aimed at assisting editors reach a consensus. [[WP:CON|Consensus]] is the the founding principle that governs the way this site works and if you want to contribute here, you need to be prepared to work within that model which means discussing with other editors and reaching an agreement, not forcing your own way, edit warring, using tags as tools to get your own way and so forth. Frankly, if I had come upon that dispute while it was happening, I very likely would have blocked you because you were edit warring against several other editors over your own images. You were the only one restoring the image while multiple users removed them. The fact that no one else was agreeing with you really should have sent the message that you can't win by force and need to sit down and talk about it calmly. As I've said already, we appreciate your images and welcome your contributions but you have a conflict of interest and should not be edit warring over them.  +++$+++ :::None of these points make any difference and an editor doesn't have to contribute "development of the article" in order to participate in deciding on usage of an image. Wikipedia welcomes contributions from new users so it really doesn't matter if they have "no edit history" or not; that is completely irrelevant. We do not decide things here according to who has the best or most extensive edit history, we decide based on strength of arguments. That's why in discussions (like AFDs, for example) you can have ten people voting one way and all you need is one person to come a long and make a strong policy-based argument for the closure to go against the majority. So none of these points you're raising are relevant or justify the edit warring. The bottom line here is: you should never edit war over your own images. There's no way around that and no possible excuse or justification for doing so. If you add an image to an article and another editor removes it, take it to the talk pages but don't keep restoring it yourself. If you post to the talk page and you're in the right, other editors will restore the image for you, keeping your hands "clean". I think you're a bit confused about mediation - mediation isn't a court case and no one issues a judgment that "decides in your favour", rather it is a process aimed at assisting editors reach a consensus. [[WP:CON|Consensus]] is the the founding principle that governs the way this site works and if you want to contribute here, you need to be prepared to work within that model which means discussing with other editors and reaching an agreement, not forcing your own way, edit warring, using tags as tools to get your own way and so forth. Frankly, if I had come upon that dispute while it was happening, I very likely would have blocked you because you were edit warring against several other editors over your own images. You were the only one restoring the image while multiple users removed them. The fact that no one else was agreeing with you really should have sent the message that you can't win by force and need to sit down and talk about it calmly. As I've said already, we appreciate your images and welcome your contributions but you have a conflict of interest and should not be edit warring over them. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
275288 +++$+++ Gwillhickers +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275283 +++$+++ 275287 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.276045080E09 +++$+++ Sorry, am not accustomed to double standards.  If someone deletes something with no discussion first then the contributor, like anyone else, should be able to restore it, as I did, with an explanation in edit history notes. This is standard as years of edit history will affirm. Someone who feels they must remove it again, at that point should try to resolve it in discussion. This never happened until I initiated the discussion.  And again, the dispute wasn't over 'my image', the reasons for the dispute are clearly delineated. ie.NPOV, national origin of image, topics you roundly ignored. The dispute was settled two weeks ago where I removed the NPOV tag of my own accord and bowed out.  Your message of late did little more than rehash what has already been settled.  +++$+++ ::::Sorry, am not accustomed to double standards.  If someone deletes something with no discussion first then the contributor, like anyone else, should be able to restore it, as I did, with an explanation in edit history notes. This is standard as years of edit history will affirm. Someone who feels they must remove it again, at that point should try to resolve it in discussion. This never happened until I initiated the discussion.  And again, the dispute wasn't over 'my image', the reasons for the dispute are clearly delineated. ie.NPOV, national origin of image, topics you roundly ignored. The dispute was settled two weeks ago where I removed the NPOV tag of my own accord and bowed out.  Your message of late did little more than rehash what has already been settled. [[User:Gwillhickers|GWillHickers]] ([[User talk:Gwillhickers|talk]]) 17:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
275289 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275283 +++$+++ 275288 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.276285200E09 +++$+++ \"This is standard as years of edit history will affirm.\" Um, no it's not, not on this project.  +++$+++ :::::"This is standard as years of edit history will affirm." Um, no it's not, not on this project. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

570169 +++$+++ Truco-X +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.206613440E09 +++$+++ Hi, I am having a problem with the images (and I saw that you may have some experience with it), so if possible may you fix my Images in [[User:Truco-X\/Browse Bar|Browse Bar]]. Thank You (I have tried to no avail).--'''''[[User:Truco-X|<font color=\"black\">T<\/font><font color=\"blue\">r<\/font><font color=\"black\">U<\/font>]][[User talk:Truco-X|<font color=\"blue\">C<\/font><font color=\"Black\">o<\/font>]] +++$+++ Hi, I am having a problem with the images (and I saw that you may have some experience with it), so if possible may you fix my Images in [[User:Truco-X/Browse Bar|Browse Bar]]. Thank You (I have tried to no avail).--'''''[[User:Truco-X|<font color="black">T</font><font color="blue">r</font><font color="black">U</font>]][[User talk:Truco-X|<font color="blue">C</font><font color="Black">o</font>]][[User:Truco-X/Guestbook|<font color="black">-</font><font color="blue">X</font>]]''''' 03:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
570170 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570169 +++$+++ 570169 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.206620220E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 05:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

537432 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537432 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-25 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.159207320E09 +++$+++ Hi! Could you please move [[Boris Mikhailov (footballer)]] back to [[Borislav Mikhailov]] and delete the redirect from [[Boris Mikhailov (footballer)]]? It's just a user mistake and going through [[WP:RM]] would take too long. Thanks :) ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ Hi! Could you please move [[Boris Mikhailov (footballer)]] back to [[Borislav Mikhailov]] and delete the redirect from [[Boris Mikhailov (footballer)]]? It's just a user mistake and going through [[WP:RM]] would take too long. Thanks :) ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 11:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
537433 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537432 +++$+++ 537432 +++$+++ 2006-09-25 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.159209360E09 +++$+++ Thanks! It seems like he was also known under that name too (at least in England), so the redirect is OK after all, but we'd have to link all pages back to Borislav Mikhailov and bypass the redirect. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : Thanks! It seems like he was also known under that name too (at least in England), so the redirect is OK after all, but we'd have to link all pages back to Borislav Mikhailov and bypass the redirect. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 11:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

13145 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13145 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.309845480E09 +++$+++ Just so you know, this was probably another sock of a longtime abuser, sometimes known as the Disney Channel vandal, who may himself be a sock of [[Wikipedia:Long-term abuse\/Bambifan101|Bambifan101]]. Blocked indef of course.  +++$+++ Just so you know, this was probably another sock of a longtime abuser, sometimes known as the Disney Channel vandal, who may himself be a sock of [[Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bambifan101|Bambifan101]]. Blocked indef of course. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 22:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
13146 +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ The Interior +++$+++ 13145 +++$+++ 13145 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.309847040E09 +++$+++ An interesting individual.  Thanks for the link.  +++$+++ :An interesting individual.  Thanks for the link. [[User:The Interior|<font color="brown">The</font><font color="green"> Interior</font>]] [[User Talk:The Interior|(Talk)]] 23:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

275290 +++$+++ GregJackP +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275290 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-07 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.275904320E09 +++$+++ Sarah, I based my comments to Don (on his talk page) on [[WP:COI]], #2, which states: \"if you have a conflict of interest avoid, or exercise great caution, when: Participating in deletion discussions...\"  I have always found Don to be above board, to make reasonable comments, and to try and abide with WP policies.  I had no intention of 'biting' him, but I'm not clear based on your AfD discussion comment why my advice (based on the above) was not correct.  Could you clear that up for me?  Thanks,  +++$+++ Sarah, I based my comments to Don (on his talk page) on [[WP:COI]], #2, which states: "if you have a conflict of interest avoid, or exercise great caution, when: Participating in deletion discussions..."  I have always found Don to be above board, to make reasonable comments, and to try and abide with WP policies.  I had no intention of 'biting' him, but I'm not clear based on your AfD discussion comment why my advice (based on the above) was not correct.  Could you clear that up for me?  Thanks, [[User:GregJackP|GregJackP]] ([[User talk:GregJackP|talk]]) 02:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
275291 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275290 +++$+++ 275290 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.275914340E09 +++$+++ Hi Greg, I understand and I didn't think you were biting, but I think you're placing a bit too much weight on that section of WP:COI. COI is a guideline (not a policy) so it doesn't over-ride policies and that section is specifically and explicitly only referring to articles about a COI editor's \"organization or its competitors\", ''not'' biographies. In your comment above, you stop quoting at \"...Participating in deletion discussions...\" but if you quote the sentence in full, what it says is \"Participating in deletion discussions about ''articles related to your organization or its competitors;''\" (my italics) there is no mention there of biographies. Both [[WP:BLPDEL|BLP's Deletion section]] and the  [[Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Deletion_discussion|Deletion policy]] allow article subjects to have a voice in the decision to delete biographies about themselves so prohibiting them from commenting in the discussion is only going to undermine those policies. Generally we welcome article subjects making reasoned comments in discussions and will only ask them to refrain from commenting if they're being disruptive or unhelpful to the process. As I noted on the deletion discussion, the closing administrator will take an article subject's wishes under advisement - particularly those of borderline notability - and under the [[Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Deletion_discussion|Deletion discussion]] provisions of the deletion policy, a BLP subject's desire for deleting the biography ''can'' be the tipping point in closing an AFD as delete, so it's important they have the opportunity to have a voice in the discussion. As long as they behave appropriately on the deletion page and they're open and honest about who they are, so the closing administrator may weight their views accordingly, they are welcome to participate (and they may also initiate the discussion and nominate their biography for deletion if they wish). A quick search of the AFD archives brings up lots of examples of BLP subjects participating in AFDs about their own biographies, and I know there's plenty more, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Florence Nibart-Devouard|Florence Nibart-Devouard]] (commenting as Anthere) [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Seth_Finkelstein_(2nd)|Seth_Finkelstein]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Chip Berlet (2nd nomination)|Chip Berlet]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Calpernia Addams|Calpernia Addams]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Calpernia Addams (2nd nomination)|Calpernia Addams 2]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Val Henson|Val Henson]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Krzysztof P. Jasiutowicz|Krzysztof P. Jasiutowicz]] (as Kpjas), [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Mike Busbee|Mike Busbee]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Gordon James Klingenschmitt|Gordon James Klingenschmitt]]. [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/David Boothroyd|David Boothroyd]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/David Boothroyd (2nd nomination)|David Boothroyd 2]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Ed O'Loughlin 2nd attempt|Ed O'Loughlin]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Emmalina_(3rd_nomination)|Emmalina]]. I hope this helps answer your question. To be clear, I don't think you've been biting anyone and I'm grateful that you've been trying to help the subject of the article. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi Greg, I understand and I didn't think you were biting, but I think you're placing a bit too much weight on that section of WP:COI. COI is a guideline (not a policy) so it doesn't over-ride policies and that section is specifically and explicitly only referring to articles about a COI editor's "organization or its competitors", ''not'' biographies. In your comment above, you stop quoting at "...Participating in deletion discussions..." but if you quote the sentence in full, what it says is "Participating in deletion discussions about ''articles related to your organization or its competitors;''" (my italics) there is no mention there of biographies. Both [[WP:BLPDEL|BLP's Deletion section]] and the  [[Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Deletion_discussion|Deletion policy]] allow article subjects to have a voice in the decision to delete biographies about themselves so prohibiting them from commenting in the discussion is only going to undermine those policies. Generally we welcome article subjects making reasoned comments in discussions and will only ask them to refrain from commenting if they're being disruptive or unhelpful to the process. As I noted on the deletion discussion, the closing administrator will take an article subject's wishes under advisement - particularly those of borderline notability - and under the [[Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Deletion_discussion|Deletion discussion]] provisions of the deletion policy, a BLP subject's desire for deleting the biography ''can'' be the tipping point in closing an AFD as delete, so it's important they have the opportunity to have a voice in the discussion. As long as they behave appropriately on the deletion page and they're open and honest about who they are, so the closing administrator may weight their views accordingly, they are welcome to participate (and they may also initiate the discussion and nominate their biography for deletion if they wish). A quick search of the AFD archives brings up lots of examples of BLP subjects participating in AFDs about their own biographies, and I know there's plenty more, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florence Nibart-Devouard|Florence Nibart-Devouard]] (commenting as Anthere) [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Seth_Finkelstein_(2nd)|Seth_Finkelstein]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chip Berlet (2nd nomination)|Chip Berlet]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calpernia Addams|Calpernia Addams]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calpernia Addams (2nd nomination)|Calpernia Addams 2]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Val Henson|Val Henson]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krzysztof P. Jasiutowicz|Krzysztof P. Jasiutowicz]] (as Kpjas), [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Busbee|Mike Busbee]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon James Klingenschmitt|Gordon James Klingenschmitt]]. [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd|David Boothroyd]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd (2nd nomination)|David Boothroyd 2]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed O'Loughlin 2nd attempt|Ed O'Loughlin]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmalina_(3rd_nomination)|Emmalina]]. I hope this helps answer your question. To be clear, I don't think you've been biting anyone and I'm grateful that you've been trying to help the subject of the article. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:39, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
275292 +++$+++ GregJackP +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275290 +++$+++ 275291 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.275934920E09 +++$+++ OK.  Thanks, it makes more sense now.   +++$+++ ::OK.  Thanks, it makes more sense now.  [[User:GregJackP|GregJackP]] ([[User talk:GregJackP|talk]]) 11:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

537436 +++$+++ Petrouchka +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-27 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.159383900E09 +++$+++ Thanks also for pointing out [[Nicanor (Syrian general)]], I missed that since he wasn't on the disambig page. He corresponds to what I had marked as \"Nicanor (son of Patroclus)\" (= Smith i.12); I think I prefer my title because, just judging from Smith, it doesn't look like there are strong grounds for saying he was Syrian (he was sent to Judaea by Lysias of Syria, but that's not quite the same thing).  +++$+++ Thanks also for pointing out [[Nicanor (Syrian general)]], I missed that since he wasn't on the disambig page. He corresponds to what I had marked as "Nicanor (son of Patroclus)" (= Smith i.12); I think I prefer my title because, just judging from Smith, it doesn't look like there are strong grounds for saying he was Syrian (he was sent to Judaea by Lysias of Syria, but that's not quite the same thing). [[User:Petrouchka|Petrouchka]] 12:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
537437 +++$+++ Petrouchka +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537436 +++$+++ 537436 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.159417080E09 +++$+++ I'm especially grateful for your pointing out that Smith's i.12 and 1.13 are better treated as the same individual; that's something I probably wouldn't have picked up on until going into his article in detail. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I'm especially grateful for your pointing out that Smith's i.12 and 1.13 are better treated as the same individual; that's something I probably wouldn't have picked up on until going into his article in detail. Cheers, [[User:Petrouchka|Petrouchka]] 21:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
537438 +++$+++ Petrouchka +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537436 +++$+++ 537437 +++$+++ 2006-10-05 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.160062740E09 +++$+++ Another note (unrelated to Nicanor this time; he's mostly taken care of, apart from stuff like templates and other conventions that I am continuing to discover haphazardly). I've just gone back and seen the reply you posted to my excessively hot-tempered moan at [[Talk:Eustathius of Thessalonica]]. For my part I'd like to apologise completely for losing my cool -- I must have been under stress at the time or something. My best side doesn't come out on Wikipedia as much as I'd like, as I often edit when I'm insomniac. Anyway, I have enormous respect for the quite breath-taking breadth and depth of work you do here and want to apologise for making your life just that little bit harder that day. I hope there aren't excessively hard feelings.  +++$+++ ::Another note (unrelated to Nicanor this time; he's mostly taken care of, apart from stuff like templates and other conventions that I am continuing to discover haphazardly). I've just gone back and seen the reply you posted to my excessively hot-tempered moan at [[Talk:Eustathius of Thessalonica]]. For my part I'd like to apologise completely for losing my cool -- I must have been under stress at the time or something. My best side doesn't come out on Wikipedia as much as I'd like, as I often edit when I'm insomniac. Anyway, I have enormous respect for the quite breath-taking breadth and depth of work you do here and want to apologise for making your life just that little bit harder that day. I hope there aren't excessively hard feelings. [[User:Petrouchka|Petrouchka]] 08:39, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
537439 +++$+++ Petrouchka +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537436 +++$+++ 537438 +++$+++ 2006-10-05 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.160102580E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux, thanks for your generous comments. I'm perplexed over the mediation case you pointed me to! and surprised that the issue is between Latin and Erasmian phonology, rather than Latin and modern, which would make more sense to me. I think ... no, I think I'd rather not go there. I mostly inhabit the Classical and pre-Classical world, anyway, so ... hmm, yep. I'm a bit of a shyster when it comes to heavily disputed articles and issues, I'm afraid. Anyway, now that you've alerted me to the naming conventions policy I'll go along with that. Maybe Latin is the way to resolve all the world's issues after all, I dunno. (*throws hands up*)  +++$+++ ::: Hi Aldux, thanks for your generous comments. I'm perplexed over the mediation case you pointed me to! and surprised that the issue is between Latin and Erasmian phonology, rather than Latin and modern, which would make more sense to me. I think ... no, I think I'd rather not go there. I mostly inhabit the Classical and pre-Classical world, anyway, so ... hmm, yep. I'm a bit of a shyster when it comes to heavily disputed articles and issues, I'm afraid. Anyway, now that you've alerted me to the naming conventions policy I'll go along with that. Maybe Latin is the way to resolve all the world's issues after all, I dunno. (*throws hands up*) [[User:Petrouchka|Petrouchka]] 19:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

275293 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-07 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.275939780E09 +++$+++ I was wondering if you can check [[:Image:Loureed100.jpg|this deleted (on Wiki) image?]] Just that there is a [[Commons:COM:Deletion requests\/File:Loureed100.jpg|deletion request]] for [[:File:Loureed100.jpg]] on Commons.  +++$+++ I was wondering if you can check [[:Image:Loureed100.jpg|this deleted (on Wiki) image?]] Just that there is a [[Commons:COM:Deletion requests/File:Loureed100.jpg|deletion request]] for [[:File:Loureed100.jpg]] on Commons. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 12:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
275294 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275293 +++$+++ 275293 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.275940200E09 +++$+++ Hi Bidgee. Can you explain what you mean by check it? Do you mean on OTRS?? I'm happy to help just need clarification as to what exactly you're wanting me to do!  +++$+++ :Hi Bidgee. Can you explain what you mean by check it? Do you mean on OTRS?? I'm happy to help just need clarification as to what exactly you're wanting me to do! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
275295 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275293 +++$+++ 275294 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 12:56:00 +++$+++ 1.275940560E09 +++$+++ Nevermind, I found the commons discussion (that deletion link isn't working for me and goes to an empty page on Commons). I'm having a look-see at the deleted file now. Be back in a few mins.  +++$+++ ::Nevermind, I found the commons discussion (that deletion link isn't working for me and goes to an empty page on Commons). I'm having a look-see at the deleted file now. Be back in a few mins. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
275296 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275293 +++$+++ 275295 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.275940680E09 +++$+++ (EC)Checking the deleted version (Page history and File history) via the View or restore X deleted edits on en Wikipedia (Who uploaded it, the source they used in the info box)? Sorry to confuse you. Also [[Commons:Commons:Deletion requests\/File:Loureed100.jpg]]  +++$+++ :::(EC)Checking the deleted version (Page history and File history) via the View or restore X deleted edits on en Wikipedia (Who uploaded it, the source they used in the info box)? Sorry to confuse you. Also [[Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Loureed100.jpg]] [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 12:58, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
275297 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275293 +++$+++ 275296 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.275941880E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I figured that was what you meant when I found the deletion page on Commons. I would consider everything uploaded by this guy, {{User| Caligvla}} as extremely dubious. He uploaded a number of images and claimed they were taken by him but the claim seems extremely suspect. A number have been deleted from here as copyvios. I'm still looking through his deleted files but at least one which he claimed was his has a banner in the lower left corner for www.morrissey-web.com.  Another file he uploaded of a \"boy in Armenia\" was licensed \"pd self\" and was later deleted with the log summary \"probable copyvio - creator refuses to give source\". I'm going to have a look on OTRS in a sec and see if he ever wrote to them but I'm finding it hard to believe he actually took these pictures. This is another of his which is now on Commons - [[:File:Morrissey-Alexander-Film-.jpg]]. +++$+++ ::::Yeah, I figured that was what you meant when I found the deletion page on Commons. I would consider everything uploaded by this guy, {{User| Caligvla}} as extremely dubious. He uploaded a number of images and claimed they were taken by him but the claim seems extremely suspect. A number have been deleted from here as copyvios. I'm still looking through his deleted files but at least one which he claimed was his has a banner in the lower left corner for www.morrissey-web.com.  Another file he uploaded of a "boy in Armenia" was licensed "pd self" and was later deleted with the log summary "probable copyvio - creator refuses to give source". I'm going to have a look on OTRS in a sec and see if he ever wrote to them but I'm finding it hard to believe he actually took these pictures. This is another of his which is now on Commons - [[:File:Morrissey-Alexander-Film-.jpg]].[[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
275298 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275293 +++$+++ 275296 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.275943500E09 +++$+++ Just to add that he uploaded it as <nowiki>{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}}<\/nowiki>. I just checked OTRS and there's no emails there about this image or from that user. I guess we could email Timothy Greenfield-Sanders or Lou Reed via their websites, but the whole thing seems completely bogus to me and I don't trust any of this guy's uploads.  +++$+++ ::::Just to add that he uploaded it as <nowiki>{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}}</nowiki>. I just checked OTRS and there's no emails there about this image or from that user. I guess we could email Timothy Greenfield-Sanders or Lou Reed via their websites, but the whole thing seems completely bogus to me and I don't trust any of this guy's uploads. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:45, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
275299 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275293 +++$+++ 275298 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.275944220E09 +++$+++ Well clearly the photo in [http:\/\/www.timeoutsydney.com.au\/aroundtown\/lou-reed-to-curate-vivid-sydney-2010.aspx this article] is part of [[:File:Loureed100.jpg]] and the photo cited is by Timothy Greenfield-Sanders.  +++$+++ :::::Well clearly the photo in [http://www.timeoutsydney.com.au/aroundtown/lou-reed-to-curate-vivid-sydney-2010.aspx this article] is part of [[:File:Loureed100.jpg]] and the photo cited is by Timothy Greenfield-Sanders. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 13:57, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
275300 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275293 +++$+++ 275299 +++$+++ 2010-06-07 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.275945000E09 +++$+++ Well I've deleted the Lou Reed photograph, looks like I'll have to clean-up yet another dubious editor's uploads! Thank you for your help and time to look into it for me, bit hard being an Admin on one site but unable to view it on another.  +++$+++ ::::::Well I've deleted the Lou Reed photograph, looks like I'll have to clean-up yet another dubious editor's uploads! Thank you for your help and time to look into it for me, bit hard being an Admin on one site but unable to view it on another. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 14:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
275301 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275293 +++$+++ 275300 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.276001100E09 +++$+++ You're most welcome, Bidgee. Am always happy to help you any way I can. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::::::You're most welcome, Bidgee. Am always happy to help you any way I can. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:45, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

13150 +++$+++ Valoem +++$+++ David Schaich +++$+++ 13150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-11 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.302557580E09 +++$+++ I based my sentence on the citation. Are you saying the citation is wrong?  +++$+++ I based my sentence on the citation. Are you saying the citation is wrong? [[User:Valoem|<font color="DarkSlateGray">'''Valoem'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Valoem|'''<font color="Black">talk</font>''']]</sup> 14:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
13151 +++$+++ David_Schaich +++$+++ David Schaich +++$+++ 13150 +++$+++ 13150 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.302588180E09 +++$+++ Lots of information about the history and development of technicolor is already in the Wikipedia article (with much more reliable citations), so I suggest you read it before making further improvements.  And when in doubt, assume that the popular press is wrong (as is usually the case).  Cheers,  +++$+++ :Lots of information about the history and development of technicolor is already in the Wikipedia article (with much more reliable citations), so I suggest you read it before making further improvements.  And when in doubt, assume that the popular press is wrong (as is usually the case).  Cheers, [[User:David Schaich|David Schaich]] <small><sup>[[User talk:David Schaich|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/David_Schaich|Cont]]</sub></small> 23:03, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
13152 +++$+++ Valoem +++$+++ David Schaich +++$+++ 13150 +++$+++ 13151 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.302641280E09 +++$+++ Interesting read, is there anyway we can add a history section to the article? I think the information is fairly important to Technicolor.  +++$+++ ::Interesting read, is there anyway we can add a history section to the article? I think the information is fairly important to Technicolor. [[User:Valoem|<font color="DarkSlateGray">'''Valoem'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Valoem|'''<font color="Black">talk</font>''']]</sup> 13:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
13153 +++$+++ David_Schaich +++$+++ David Schaich +++$+++ 13150 +++$+++ 13152 +++$+++ 2011-04-13 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.302680820E09 +++$+++ Well, as I said, the history is already in the article, and sections 2--6 are primarily organized chronologically.  The details of the \"low-scale technicolor\" model that Eichten and Lane started working on in 1989 are mainly given in subsection 7.2 on hadron collider phenomenology, which is probably appropriate since it is a fairly specific realization of the more general technicolor approach.  (It is this lack of generality that allows them to make more specific predictions for signals like that recently reported by CDF.) Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Well, as I said, the history is already in the article, and sections 2--6 are primarily organized chronologically.  The details of the "low-scale technicolor" model that Eichten and Lane started working on in 1989 are mainly given in subsection 7.2 on hadron collider phenomenology, which is probably appropriate since it is a fairly specific realization of the more general technicolor approach.  (It is this lack of generality that allows them to make more specific predictions for signals like that recently reported by CDF.) Cheers, [[User:David Schaich|David Schaich]] <small><sup>[[User talk:David Schaich|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/David_Schaich|Cont]]</sub></small> 00:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

537441 +++$+++ Golbez +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-30 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.159671180E09 +++$+++ I'd love to make maps of Chad, it's been on my list for some time - but there's a lack of information about the regions. When last I checked, I wasn't able to find a reference map with the most recent regions, but I'll look around again. -- +++$+++ I'd love to make maps of Chad, it's been on my list for some time - but there's a lack of information about the regions. When last I checked, I wasn't able to find a reference map with the most recent regions, but I'll look around again. --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 19:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
537442 +++$+++ Golbez +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537441 +++$+++ 537441 +++$+++ 2006-10-01 10:42:00 +++$+++ 1.159724520E09 +++$+++ That map may just be exactly what I need, lemme work on it a bit. -- +++$+++ :That map may just be exactly what I need, lemme work on it a bit. --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 10:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
537443 +++$+++ Golbez +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537441 +++$+++ 537442 +++$+++ 2006-10-01 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.159727340E09 +++$+++ I can handle the northern 2\/3 of the country just fine, but the south is way too small for me to make sense of. I can't tell what are rivers and what are borders, and since most departments are unlabelled, I can't tell which departments belong to which region. :\/ -- +++$+++ ::I can handle the northern 2/3 of the country just fine, but the south is way too small for me to make sense of. I can't tell what are rivers and what are borders, and since most departments are unlabelled, I can't tell which departments belong to which region. :/ --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 11:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
537444 +++$+++ Golbez +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537441 +++$+++ 537443 +++$+++ 2006-10-01 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.159730520E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, I won't stop. It will just take longer than I expected. My detective skills may yet win the day! -- +++$+++ :::Don't worry, I won't stop. It will just take longer than I expected. My detective skills may yet win the day! --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 12:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

13154 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-28 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.303987740E09 +++$+++ Hey, Rcej! ;) Would you be up to reviewing [[Blaine Anderson]]?  +++$+++ Hey, Rcej! ;) Would you be up to reviewing [[Blaine Anderson]]? [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 03:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
13155 +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13154 +++$+++ 13154 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.303990860E09 +++$+++ Cool... sure! :) ''' +++$+++ :Cool... sure! :) '''[[User:Rcej|Rcej]] (Robert)''' - '''''[[User talk:Rcej|talk]]''''' 04:41, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

45883 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Keithbob +++$+++ 45883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-24 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.308937740E09 +++$+++ Regarding the COI problems the TM topic, your list does show how hard it has been to resolve these problems. I really don't understand how folks are interpreting the COI guideline, but the impression I get is that no one involved in that topic believes it applies to them. May I ask you a purely hypothetical question? Do you think that the COI guideline applies to people writing about their employers, friends, colleagues, or spiritual leaders? &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ Regarding the COI problems the TM topic, your list does show how hard it has been to resolve these problems. I really don't understand how folks are interpreting the COI guideline, but the impression I get is that no one involved in that topic believes it applies to them. May I ask you a purely hypothetical question? Do you think that the COI guideline applies to people writing about their employers, friends, colleagues, or spiritual leaders? &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 10:49, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
45884 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Keithbob +++$+++ 45883 +++$+++ 45883 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.308940500E09 +++$+++ Keith, would you rather I bring up COI concerns on the talk pages of individual editors? Since there are a number of editors that'd lead to some repetition, but if you think that's what's necessary at this point then I'll willing to do that instead of leaving general questions. The editors on this topic have been to the noticeboards several times, do you expect a different result with a future posting? If you think that would help I can start another COIN thread. What I'm not willing to do is ignore the problem entirely, as that can't really be done. It's like a herd of (very calm) elephants in the room. :) &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :Keith, would you rather I bring up COI concerns on the talk pages of individual editors? Since there are a number of editors that'd lead to some repetition, but if you think that's what's necessary at this point then I'll willing to do that instead of leaving general questions. The editors on this topic have been to the noticeboards several times, do you expect a different result with a future posting? If you think that would help I can start another COIN thread. What I'm not willing to do is ignore the problem entirely, as that can't really be done. It's like a herd of (very calm) elephants in the room. :) &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 11:35, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
45885 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Keithbob +++$+++ 45883 +++$+++ 45884 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.308972660E09 +++$+++ It certainly isn't my intention to harass anyone, and I don't think that I have done so unintentionally either. But I don't see anything in your posts about how to deal with the COI problems that editors refuse to address. Are you proposing that I ignore them, and that I am the only editor who should follow the COI guideline? &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::It certainly isn't my intention to harass anyone, and I don't think that I have done so unintentionally either. But I don't see anything in your posts about how to deal with the COI problems that editors refuse to address. Are you proposing that I ignore them, and that I am the only editor who should follow the COI guideline? &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 20:31, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
45886 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Keithbob +++$+++ 45883 +++$+++ 45885 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.309172640E09 +++$+++ Keithbob, I'm still wondering how you think it's best to handle the COI issues surrounding TM topics. You've objected when I've posted to user talk pages and to article talk pages. There have been multiple noticeboard postings, but editors keep rejecting the community feedback. The ArbCom case reaffirmed that COI is an applicable guideline. So how do we deal with this? &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::Keithbob, I'm still wondering how you think it's best to handle the COI issues surrounding TM topics. You've objected when I've posted to user talk pages and to article talk pages. There have been multiple noticeboard postings, but editors keep rejecting the community feedback. The ArbCom case reaffirmed that COI is an applicable guideline. So how do we deal with this? &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 04:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

13156 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13156 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-20 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.305939420E09 +++$+++ Hey again! I just did a major expansion on [[Lauren Zizes]], and took it to GAN. Would you be willing to review it? The article is relatively shorter than most of the ''Glee'' character articles, but I think it has GA potential none the less.  +++$+++ Hey again! I just did a major expansion on [[Lauren Zizes]], and took it to GAN. Would you be willing to review it? The article is relatively shorter than most of the ''Glee'' character articles, but I think it has GA potential none the less. [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 17:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
13157 +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13156 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.305972600E09 +++$+++ I grabbed it... it may be late Sun. or so before I start tho :) Thx for the heads up! ''' +++$+++ ::I grabbed it... it may be late Sun. or so before I start tho :) Thx for the heads up! '''[[User:Rcej|<font color="#259900">Rcej</font>]] (Robert)''' &ndash; '''''[[User talk:Rcej|<font color="#259900">talk</font>]]''''' 03:10, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
13158 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13156 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.306029960E09 +++$+++ Awesome! Oh, and that's perfectly okay. There's no rush on it. ;)  +++$+++ :::Awesome! Oh, and that's perfectly okay. There's no rush on it. ;) [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 19:06, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
13159 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13156 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.308468960E09 +++$+++ Hey there! I just nominated [[Terri Schuester]] for GA status. Would you be interesting in reviewing if you're not busy?  +++$+++ ::::Hey there! I just nominated [[Terri Schuester]] for GA status. Would you be interesting in reviewing if you're not busy? [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 00:36, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
13160 +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13156 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.308476400E09 +++$+++ Grabbed it! I hope she's on more often next season... ''' +++$+++ :::::Grabbed it! I hope she's on more often next season... '''[[User:Rcej|<font color="#259900">Rcej</font>]] (Robert)''' &ndash; '''''[[User talk:Rcej|<font color="#259900">talk</font>]]''''' 02:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
13161 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13156 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.308478800E09 +++$+++ Awesome, thanks for taking it on! ;) Unfortunately, Gilsig was bumped down to a recurring player for season three, which is depressing because I like her.  +++$+++ ::::::Awesome, thanks for taking it on! ;) Unfortunately, Gilsig was bumped down to a recurring player for season three, which is depressing because I like her. [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 03:20, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

275302 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-08 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.276007940E09 +++$+++ {{Userlinks|Mjspe1}} added Popular culture section (under the IP of {{Userlinks|128.250.80.15}}) just to add that a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Doug_Anthony&diff=366711463&oldid=361350801 band has Doug Anthony mentioned] in a song then they moved to the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Doug_Anthony&diff=366719410&oldid=366713428 talk page] and began [[WP:SOAPBOX|soapboxing]] on it.  +++$+++ {{Userlinks|Mjspe1}} added Popular culture section (under the IP of {{Userlinks|128.250.80.15}}) just to add that a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Doug_Anthony&diff=366711463&oldid=361350801 band has Doug Anthony mentioned] in a song then they moved to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Doug_Anthony&diff=366719410&oldid=366713428 talk page] and began [[WP:SOAPBOX|soapboxing]] on it. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 07:39, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
275303 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275302 +++$+++ 275302 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.276018560E09 +++$+++ I reviewed his edits and left comments on his talk page and at the editor assistance page. It looks like a trolling to me but I don't think it's worth edit warring over his general talk page comments, though the song lyrics obviously have to go under NPOV, BLP, V and the NFCC. I think he might have violated 3RR on the talk page but I'm going to have to have a look through the individual edits.  +++$+++ :I reviewed his edits and left comments on his talk page and at the editor assistance page. It looks like a trolling to me but I don't think it's worth edit warring over his general talk page comments, though the song lyrics obviously have to go under NPOV, BLP, V and the NFCC. I think he might have violated 3RR on the talk page but I'm going to have to have a look through the individual edits. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

395409 +++$+++ His excellency +++$+++ Salman01 +++$+++ 395409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-08 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.152346200E09 +++$+++ On [[WP:ANI]] I filed a notice on Merzbow using baseless warnings and warning templates to intimidate editors with whom he has problems with. I'm mentioning your case as precedent. If you would like to comment, I suggest you respond to the ANI. [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Abuse_of_Warning_Templates_By_Merzbow]]  +++$+++ On [[WP:ANI]] I filed a notice on Merzbow using baseless warnings and warning templates to intimidate editors with whom he has problems with. I'm mentioning your case as precedent. If you would like to comment, I suggest you respond to the ANI. [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Abuse_of_Warning_Templates_By_Merzbow]] [[User:His excellency|His Excellency...]] 01:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
395410 +++$+++ Salman01 +++$+++ Salman01 +++$+++ 395409 +++$+++ 395409 +++$+++ 2006-07-08 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.152349620E09 +++$+++ I am with you my brother [[User:His excellency|His Excellency...]]. He is messing up my concentration by saying that if i delete anymore comments he is going to block me from editing. I mean [[User:His excellency|His Excellency...]] i told him so many times the reason why i want to keep my talk page short, but he doesn't understand or doesn't want to understand. Thank You-- +++$+++ :I am with you my brother [[User:His excellency|His Excellency...]]. He is messing up my concentration by saying that if i delete anymore comments he is going to block me from editing. I mean [[User:His excellency|His Excellency...]] i told him so many times the reason why i want to keep my talk page short, but he doesn't understand or doesn't want to understand. Thank You--[[User:Salman01|Salman]] 02:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

275304 +++$+++ Keepscases +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-08 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.276055640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Keepscases|Keepscases]] ([[User talk:Keepscases|talk]]) 20:54, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
275305 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275304 +++$+++ 275304 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.276063320E09 +++$+++ Ummm...no? I accept your apology of course, but I don't remember that. LOL  +++$+++ :Ummm...no? I accept your apology of course, but I don't remember that. LOL [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 23:02, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
275306 +++$+++ Keepscases +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275304 +++$+++ 275305 +++$+++ 2010-06-09 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.276140780E09 +++$+++ Really?  I got blocked for sexual harrassment and everything!   +++$+++ ::Really?  I got blocked for sexual harrassment and everything!  [[User:Keepscases|Keepscases]] ([[User talk:Keepscases|talk]]) 20:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
275307 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275304 +++$+++ 275306 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 06:48:00 +++$+++ 1.276177680E09 +++$+++ I had a look at your block log and clicked on the diff to my page and I do remember that incident now. I also had a quick look over the ANI report and you weren't blocked because of the comment to me; that seems to have been the final straw after a bunch of inappropriate and immature questions you were asking women going through RFA, such as whether they edit in the nude and whether they like certain pictures of naked men etc. As I said at the time, I wasn't personally offended or upset by what you wrote to me but my background in nursing has made me a lot less sensitive than most women to inappropriate behaviour and I'd really hate to see other female editors on this project spoken to like that and made to feel uncomfortable because of their gender. We have enough trouble bringing women into the project and they should be treated with respect and not be expected to tolerate juvenile school-boy games based on their gender. I'm really very surprised you're bringing it up now. It was four years ago and I'd completely forgotten about it; you probably should, too.  +++$+++ :::I had a look at your block log and clicked on the diff to my page and I do remember that incident now. I also had a quick look over the ANI report and you weren't blocked because of the comment to me; that seems to have been the final straw after a bunch of inappropriate and immature questions you were asking women going through RFA, such as whether they edit in the nude and whether they like certain pictures of naked men etc. As I said at the time, I wasn't personally offended or upset by what you wrote to me but my background in nursing has made me a lot less sensitive than most women to inappropriate behaviour and I'd really hate to see other female editors on this project spoken to like that and made to feel uncomfortable because of their gender. We have enough trouble bringing women into the project and they should be treated with respect and not be expected to tolerate juvenile school-boy games based on their gender. I'm really very surprised you're bringing it up now. It was four years ago and I'd completely forgotten about it; you probably should, too. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:48, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
275308 +++$+++ Keepscases +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275304 +++$+++ 275307 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.276210680E09 +++$+++ I was an equal opportunity offender (my question about editing in the nude was most certainly not directed at a woman) but yes, it was a long time ago.  I just saw you around somewhere, and wanted to officially apologize, and that's that.  Take care.   +++$+++ ::::I was an equal opportunity offender (my question about editing in the nude was most certainly not directed at a woman) but yes, it was a long time ago.  I just saw you around somewhere, and wanted to officially apologize, and that's that.  Take care.  [[User:Keepscases|Keepscases]] ([[User talk:Keepscases|talk]]) 15:58, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

13162 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13162 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310212800E09 +++$+++ {{outdent}} I just completed [[Brittany Pierce]]. There's a serious backlog at [[WP:GAN]] though. Could you possibly take it on?  +++$+++ {{outdent}} I just completed [[Brittany Pierce]]. There's a serious backlog at [[WP:GAN]] though. Could you possibly take it on? [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 05:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
13163 +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13162 +++$+++ 13162 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.310214600E09 +++$+++ Hello... love me some Brittany! ''' +++$+++ :Hello... love me some Brittany! '''[[User:Rcej|<font color="#259900">Rcej</font>]] (Robert)''' &ndash; '''''[[User talk:Rcej|<font color="#259900">talk</font>]]''''' 05:30, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

13164 +++$+++ David Fuchs +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-19 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.305840660E09 +++$+++ I had a question based on a statement you made on the GAN. <font color=\"#cc6600\"> +++$+++ I had a question based on a statement you made on the GAN. <font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs]]</font><sup><small>(<font color="#ff6600">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font>)</small></sup> 14:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
13165 +++$+++ David Fuchs +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13164 +++$+++ 13164 +++$+++ 2011-06-16 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.308248820E09 +++$+++ Sorry about the delay, I entirely forgot about the review! I've responded on the review page. <font color=\"#cc6600\"> +++$+++ :Sorry about the delay, I entirely forgot about the review! I've responded on the review page. <font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs]]</font><sup><small>(<font color="#ff6600">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font>)</small></sup> 11:27, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

275309 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275309 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-10 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.276172520E09 +++$+++ What is that?   +++$+++ What is that?  [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 05:22, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
275310 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275309 +++$+++ 275309 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.276173960E09 +++$+++ BTW - I have a vandal and username issue at History of Australia - you might not be interested, but as I see you edited 15 mins ago, I thought... :|  +++$+++ :BTW - I have a vandal and username issue at History of Australia - you might not be interested, but as I see you edited 15 mins ago, I thought... :| [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 05:46, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
275311 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275309 +++$+++ 275310 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.276176300E09 +++$+++ It's the user rights for working on the [[Wikipedia:Edit filter|Edit Filter]]. I just turned it on because I was reviewing Soap's RFA and I wanted to check his contributions to it as it was being cited as one of his positive contribs to the project. It looks like your vandal has been blocked. By the way, it helps if you give a direct link to the user so we know exactly who you're talking about and don't have to go to the article and work it out from the history. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::It's the user rights for working on the [[Wikipedia:Edit filter|Edit Filter]]. I just turned it on because I was reviewing Soap's RFA and I wanted to check his contributions to it as it was being cited as one of his positive contribs to the project. It looks like your vandal has been blocked. By the way, it helps if you give a direct link to the user so we know exactly who you're talking about and don't have to go to the article and work it out from the history. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:25, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
275312 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275309 +++$+++ 275311 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.276176660E09 +++$+++ Good idea - my office is freezing and I was trying to get to the house to geta very hot drink - (re links - will do in future)... cannot stay long in here - its like being on Mount Read, Tasmania on a winters day - hope Melbourne is warmer, cheers  +++$+++ :::Good idea - my office is freezing and I was trying to get to the house to geta very hot drink - (re links - will do in future)... cannot stay long in here - its like being on Mount Read, Tasmania on a winters day - hope Melbourne is warmer, cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 06:31, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
275313 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275309 +++$+++ 275312 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.276177860E09 +++$+++ It's been freezing down here on the peninsula. It's horrible; I really hate the cold - it makes me want to take my laptop and just stay in bed all day!:)  +++$+++ ::::It's been freezing down here on the peninsula. It's horrible; I really hate the cold - it makes me want to take my laptop and just stay in bed all day!:) [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 06:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
275314 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275309 +++$+++ 275313 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 08:09:00 +++$+++ 1.276182540E09 +++$+++ Been freezing in the Riverina as well, took one look out the window and went back to bed. Will be down at Point Cook next Friday (looking like a worse day then yesterday and today) so I'm not looking forward to it with the wind coming straight off the bay.  +++$+++ :::::Been freezing in the Riverina as well, took one look out the window and went back to bed. Will be down at Point Cook next Friday (looking like a worse day then yesterday and today) so I'm not looking forward to it with the wind coming straight off the bay. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 08:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
275315 +++$+++ Aaroncrick +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275309 +++$+++ 275314 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.276183620E09 +++$+++ Lucky to have reached 12C here! ''' +++$+++ ::::::Lucky to have reached 12C here! '''[[User:Aaroncrick|<span style="font-family: Tempus Sans ITC;color: #E49B0F">Aaroncrick</span>]]'''  <small><sup>[[User talk:Aaroncrick|<span style="font-family: Calibri;color:#FE2712">'''TALK'''</span>]]</sup></small> 08:27, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
275316 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275309 +++$+++ 275315 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.276184460E09 +++$+++ Got to 12\xb0C here as well but only 9\xb0C yesterday, a big shock to the system as we've been having 19\xb0C days! Even the trees are confused with some flowering and others getting spring leaves!  +++$+++ :::::::Got to 12°C here as well but only 9°C yesterday, a big shock to the system as we've been having 19°C days! Even the trees are confused with some flowering and others getting spring leaves! [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 08:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
275317 +++$+++ Aaroncrick +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275309 +++$+++ 275316 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.276192500E09 +++$+++ Oh, at least it wasn't quite that cold for the most part. Well, 19\xb0C sounds alright :) ''' +++$+++ ::::::::Oh, at least it wasn't quite that cold for the most part. Well, 19°C sounds alright :) '''[[User:Aaroncrick|<span style="font-family: Tempus Sans ITC;color: #E49B0F">Aaroncrick</span>]]'''  <small><sup>[[User talk:Aaroncrick|<span style="font-family: Calibri;color:#FE2712">'''TALK'''</span>]]</sup></small> 10:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

89576 +++$+++ Georgia guy +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-25 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.309030980E09 +++$+++ You know so much about music theory that here's a question I want to see if you can answer. Go to the bottom of [[Talk:Hanukkah music]] and you'll see a question that hasn't been answered for several months.  +++$+++ You know so much about music theory that here's a question I want to see if you can answer. Go to the bottom of [[Talk:Hanukkah music]] and you'll see a question that hasn't been answered for several months. [[User:Georgia guy|Georgia guy]] ([[User talk:Georgia guy|talk]]) 12:43, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
89577 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89576 +++$+++ 89576 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.309046580E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I've never even heard ''of'' that song, let alone heard it or seen the sheet music, but if the first section and final cadence are both in F, then the song is in F. The change from major to minor is not usually regarded as very significant, and  just about anything can happen in the middle without making any difference in establishing the main key. Using the dominant minor for contrast is very common in minor-key pieces (and this one at least ends in minor, apparently)\u2014it would be much more startling if that section were in, say, B major. I imagine the reason you have not had an answer is that the question isn't really very interesting.\u2014 +++$+++ :Sorry, I've never even heard ''of'' that song, let alone heard it or seen the sheet music, but if the first section and final cadence are both in F, then the song is in F. The change from major to minor is not usually regarded as very significant, and  just about anything can happen in the middle without making any difference in establishing the main key. Using the dominant minor for contrast is very common in minor-key pieces (and this one at least ends in minor, apparently)—it would be much more startling if that section were in, say, B major. I imagine the reason you have not had an answer is that the question isn't really very interesting.—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 17:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
89578 +++$+++ Georgia guy +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89576 +++$+++ 89577 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309049640E09 +++$+++ One comment contradicting what your answer implies: the form of the song is the first section, followed by the second, then the first again.  +++$+++ ::One comment contradicting what your answer implies: the form of the song is the first section, followed by the second, then the first again. [[User:Georgia guy|Georgia guy]] ([[User talk:Georgia guy|talk]]) 17:54, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
89579 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89576 +++$+++ 89578 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.309051260E09 +++$+++ OK, I didn't know that. From the description you gave, I assumed it was in [[binary form]]. Now that I see it is in [[ternary form]] instead, it makes the question even less interesting, because the middle section of such a form can even be \"closed\" (that is, begins and ends in the same key) and in a contrasting key. When it is \"open\" in structure, it will normally begin in a contrasting key, and modulate back to the tonic at the end of the section. The fact that, in this case, the return is to the parallel minor is not of particular importance. This really is a very basic concept of musical form, of the sort usually taught in third-year theory courses, if not earlier. You might wish to read one of standard texts on the subject. Wallace Berry's ''Form in Music: An Examination of Traditional Techniques of Musical Form and Their Applications in Historical and Contemporary Styles'' (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1986) is still regarded as the best, I believe, though you may also consider Robert Tyndall's ''Musical Form'' (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1964) or Hugo Leichtentritt's ''Musical Form'' (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951). A more recent text, with which I am not familiar myself, is Glenn Spring and Jere Hutcheson's ''Musical Form and Analysis'' (Madison, Wisc.: Brown & Benchmark, 1995).\u2014 +++$+++ :::OK, I didn't know that. From the description you gave, I assumed it was in [[binary form]]. Now that I see it is in [[ternary form]] instead, it makes the question even less interesting, because the middle section of such a form can even be "closed" (that is, begins and ends in the same key) and in a contrasting key. When it is "open" in structure, it will normally begin in a contrasting key, and modulate back to the tonic at the end of the section. The fact that, in this case, the return is to the parallel minor is not of particular importance. This really is a very basic concept of musical form, of the sort usually taught in third-year theory courses, if not earlier. You might wish to read one of standard texts on the subject. Wallace Berry's ''Form in Music: An Examination of Traditional Techniques of Musical Form and Their Applications in Historical and Contemporary Styles'' (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1986) is still regarded as the best, I believe, though you may also consider Robert Tyndall's ''Musical Form'' (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1964) or Hugo Leichtentritt's ''Musical Form'' (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951). A more recent text, with which I am not familiar myself, is Glenn Spring and Jere Hutcheson's ''Musical Form and Analysis'' (Madison, Wisc.: Brown & Benchmark, 1995).—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 18:21, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

567826 +++$+++ 71.155.143.243 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567826 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-11 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.194777840E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, you and \"Hammer\" both seem to suffer from the same problem.  I am being punished for things others are doing, and then when I say something it's called a personal attack.  Reminds me of China.  Either take the warning OFF of my page, or add it to theirs, since they did the '''exact same thing'''.  Thank you  +++$+++ Unfortunately, you and "Hammer" both seem to suffer from the same problem.  I am being punished for things others are doing, and then when I say something it's called a personal attack.  Reminds me of China.  Either take the warning OFF of my page, or add it to theirs, since they did the '''exact same thing'''.  Thank you [[User:71.155.143.243|71.155.143.243]] 02:44, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
567827 +++$+++ Nova +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567826 +++$+++ 567826 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.194778140E09 +++$+++ If it's a shared IP, it's not our problem. We can only apologize for any mistakes that we made. &mdash;  +++$+++ :If it's a shared IP, it's not our problem. We can only apologize for any mistakes that we made. &mdash; [[User:NovaDog|<span style="color: #8E8257; font-weight: bold;">Nova</span>]][[User talk:NovaDog|<font color="silver">'''Dog'''</font>]] &mdash;  <small>([[Special:Contributions/Nova|<span style="color:#6D6968;">contribs</span>]])</small> 02:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

537460 +++$+++ Vbb-sk-mk +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-12 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.160648760E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for your help, Aldux, I really apprecciatte it. Now, I '''really''' dont want to bother you again, its just i want to point out that meanwhile '''the same user mentioned above''' has continued his\/her misbehaviour which can be clearly noticed in another article related to [[Kiro Gligorov]] and thats [[ASNOM]]. For me as an ordinary surfer, his\/her aim to take control over every article related to [[Republic of Macedonia]] is quite obvious, plz correct me if Im too paranoid.  Those same statements that you removed like \"Kiro Gligorov declared Bulgarian etnhnicity\" and so on, are just copied and pasted in the article about [[ASNOM]] too. And again, there are no sources, no footnotes and quite poor explanations.(check the history page also plz). The situation is similar with the article about [[Lazar Koli\u0161evski]], but thats another story. Theres no way for me to solve those problems  as I do not present any authority here and that ''user mentioned above'' is treating everything as his\/her private property. On the other hand I do not wish to torture u with these balkanian troubles, im sure u have more important things in life. this was just an information on '''how articles related to RoM are constantly being treated'''. Thank you again for ur kind attention.-- +++$+++ Thank you very much for your help, Aldux, I really apprecciatte it. Now, I '''really''' dont want to bother you again, its just i want to point out that meanwhile '''the same user mentioned above''' has continued his/her misbehaviour which can be clearly noticed in another article related to [[Kiro Gligorov]] and thats [[ASNOM]]. For me as an ordinary surfer, his/her aim to take control over every article related to [[Republic of Macedonia]] is quite obvious, plz correct me if Im too paranoid.  Those same statements that you removed like "Kiro Gligorov declared Bulgarian etnhnicity" and so on, are just copied and pasted in the article about [[ASNOM]] too. And again, there are no sources, no footnotes and quite poor explanations.(check the history page also plz). The situation is similar with the article about [[Lazar Koliševski]], but thats another story. Theres no way for me to solve those problems  as I do not present any authority here and that ''user mentioned above'' is treating everything as his/her private property. On the other hand I do not wish to torture u with these balkanian troubles, im sure u have more important things in life. this was just an information on '''how articles related to RoM are constantly being treated'''. Thank you again for ur kind attention.--[[User:Vbb-sk-mk|Vbb-sk-mk]] 03:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
537461 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537460 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-12 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.160689380E09 +++$+++ I guess some Republicans would rather see the history of their greatest leaders \"untainted\" by their obvious cooperation with the Bulgarian \"occupiers\".  +++$+++ ::I guess some Republicans would rather see the history of their greatest leaders "untainted" by their obvious cooperation with the Bulgarian "occupiers". [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk_</b>&nbsp;</span>]] 14:43, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

275318 +++$+++ Jclemens +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-11 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.276256580E09 +++$+++ Of all the !votes after the ANI thread at [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/50_Cutest_Child_Stars:_All_Grown_Up]], yours is the one that doesn't feel at all spiteful or punitive.  I appreciate that.  +++$+++ Of all the !votes after the ANI thread at [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/50_Cutest_Child_Stars:_All_Grown_Up]], yours is the one that doesn't feel at all spiteful or punitive.  I appreciate that. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 04:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
275319 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275318 +++$+++ 275318 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.276260180E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, I really appreciate your message. I'm sorry the AFD is feeling punitive and personal, it certainly got very nasty, so I can understand why you would feel like that. Thanks again for your message; I have only given my honest opinion of the article and sources so I'm grateful to know that my comments haven't seemed punitive or spiteful.  +++$+++ :Thank you very much, I really appreciate your message. I'm sorry the AFD is feeling punitive and personal, it certainly got very nasty, so I can understand why you would feel like that. Thanks again for your message; I have only given my honest opinion of the article and sources so I'm grateful to know that my comments haven't seemed punitive or spiteful. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

275320 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-11 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.276285860E09 +++$+++ As someone who commented on the merge of the above page to [[Victoria University of Wellington]] and in case you do not have the target Watch-listed I thourght I should let you know that an IP user has proposed the page be spit off and back to the original page. See his rational [[Talk:Victoria University of Wellington Students' Association#Victoria University Debating Society|here]].  +++$+++ As someone who commented on the merge of the above page to [[Victoria University of Wellington]] and in case you do not have the target Watch-listed I thourght I should let you know that an IP user has proposed the page be spit off and back to the original page. See his rational [[Talk:Victoria University of Wellington Students' Association#Victoria University Debating Society|here]]. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 12:51, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
275321 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275320 +++$+++ 275320 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.276286520E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks Codf. I'm not really here much at present so I'm not paying close attention to my watchlist and wasn't aware of this. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Okay, thanks Codf. I'm not really here much at present so I'm not paying close attention to my watchlist and wasn't aware of this. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 13:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

275322 +++$+++ Rrburke +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275322 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-11 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.276291500E09 +++$+++ Never saw [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALib3rtarian&action=historysubmit&diff=367364334&oldid=367348560 that] coming <nowiki>[:rolls eyes:]<\/nowiki>.  Presumably you can look forward to being the subject of a post like [http:\/\/www.movimentolibertario.it\/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3696:wikipedia-censura-il-movimento-librtario-&catid=1:latest-news this one] in which, I prophesy, you will be described as the \"commissar\" who \"censored\" this freedom-fighter and I a \"statist\" lap-dog or lackey of some kind or other.  I tire of this place every now and again.  +++$+++ Never saw [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALib3rtarian&action=historysubmit&diff=367364334&oldid=367348560 that] coming <nowiki>[:rolls eyes:]</nowiki>.  Presumably you can look forward to being the subject of a post like [http://www.movimentolibertario.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3696:wikipedia-censura-il-movimento-librtario-&catid=1:latest-news this one] in which, I prophesy, you will be described as the "commissar" who "censored" this freedom-fighter and I a "statist" lap-dog or lackey of some kind or other.  I tire of this place every now and again. [[User:Rrburke|-- Rrburke]] ([[User talk:Rrburke|talk]]) 14:25, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
275323 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275322 +++$+++ 275322 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.276293240E09 +++$+++ Uh, all I can say to that is wow! I seriously read it at least half-a-dozen times but none of it made any sense to me or seemed to have any relevance to what I said to him!  +++$+++ :Uh, all I can say to that is wow! I seriously read it at least half-a-dozen times but none of it made any sense to me or seemed to have any relevance to what I said to him! [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:54, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
275324 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275322 +++$+++ 275323 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.276294560E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALib3rtarian&action=historysubmit&diff=367431076&oldid=367428609 Well done]! Good idea. -- +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALib3rtarian&action=historysubmit&diff=367431076&oldid=367428609 Well done]! Good idea. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 15:16, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
275325 +++$+++ Rrburke +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275322 +++$+++ 275324 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.276298160E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately the articles he created suffer from the same problem -- and a host of others besides.  I would fix them myself, but the problem is that the sources are in Italian.  The best I could do is hack out large chunks of underbrush with a machete.  Because the editor's principal interest has been to publicize as much of the group's views as possible (i.e. [[WP:COATRACK]]) rather than to inform the reader about either the organization or its founders ([[Leonardo Facco]], [[Giorgio Fidenato]]), the articles are merely bloated laundry lists of policy positions (often in unidiomatic English).  My conclusion when I nominated [[Libertarian Movement (Italy)]] for [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Libertarian_Movement_(Italy)|deletion]] was that its founders are probably independently notable, but that the organization is not: the sources cited are either not independent of the subject or amount to brief mentions in articles whose principal focus is something else (e.g. it may be an article on one of the founders that mentions the organization in passing).  There are probably more constructive uses I could make of my time at WP than repairing an article I think should have been deleted and whose sources I can't understand! :) Cheers.  +++$+++ :::Unfortunately the articles he created suffer from the same problem -- and a host of others besides.  I would fix them myself, but the problem is that the sources are in Italian.  The best I could do is hack out large chunks of underbrush with a machete.  Because the editor's principal interest has been to publicize as much of the group's views as possible (i.e. [[WP:COATRACK]]) rather than to inform the reader about either the organization or its founders ([[Leonardo Facco]], [[Giorgio Fidenato]]), the articles are merely bloated laundry lists of policy positions (often in unidiomatic English).  My conclusion when I nominated [[Libertarian Movement (Italy)]] for [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Libertarian_Movement_(Italy)|deletion]] was that its founders are probably independently notable, but that the organization is not: the sources cited are either not independent of the subject or amount to brief mentions in articles whose principal focus is something else (e.g. it may be an article on one of the founders that mentions the organization in passing).  There are probably more constructive uses I could make of my time at WP than repairing an article I think should have been deleted and whose sources I can't understand! :) Cheers. [[User:Rrburke|-- Rrburke]] ([[User talk:Rrburke|talk]]) 16:16, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
275326 +++$+++ Rrburke +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275322 +++$+++ 275325 +++$+++ 2010-06-11 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.276313280E09 +++$+++ Alas, Sarah, you were overlooked: MRG and I came in for a mention, though: [http:\/\/www.movimentolibertario.it\/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6052:seconda-assemblea-del-movimento-libertario-la-convocazione-ad-arba&catid=1:latest-news see comment 11].  Evidently MRG is a \"censor\" and we are all ''wikifascists'' (\"fasciowikipediani\"). Don't feel left out: you'll probably be the target tomorrow: unless he's blocked there too!  +++$+++ ::::Alas, Sarah, you were overlooked: MRG and I came in for a mention, though: [http://www.movimentolibertario.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6052:seconda-assemblea-del-movimento-libertario-la-convocazione-ad-arba&catid=1:latest-news see comment 11].  Evidently MRG is a "censor" and we are all ''wikifascists'' ("fasciowikipediani"). Don't feel left out: you'll probably be the target tomorrow: unless he's blocked there too! [[User:Rrburke|-- Rrburke]] ([[User talk:Rrburke|talk]]) 20:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
275327 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275322 +++$+++ 275326 +++$+++ 2010-06-12 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.276341060E09 +++$+++ Heh, I shall look forward to that.:p I think he might be writing all his edits in Italian and then putting them into a machine translator. His comments and edits to articles do have a kind of strange machine feeling to them and I can't otherwise understand how he's coming up with such strange interpretations of what we're saying. Oh man, I just looked at the ML articles and they really are terrible - they just don't make any sense. I think they need to either be deleted or stubbed and started from scratch. They could almost be deleted as nonsense because that's pretty much what they are! I can't believe that their present form would be of use whatsoever to any English-speaking people trying to read them.  +++$+++ :::::Heh, I shall look forward to that.:p I think he might be writing all his edits in Italian and then putting them into a machine translator. His comments and edits to articles do have a kind of strange machine feeling to them and I can't otherwise understand how he's coming up with such strange interpretations of what we're saying. Oh man, I just looked at the ML articles and they really are terrible - they just don't make any sense. I think they need to either be deleted or stubbed and started from scratch. They could almost be deleted as nonsense because that's pretty much what they are! I can't believe that their present form would be of use whatsoever to any English-speaking people trying to read them. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:11, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
275328 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275322 +++$+++ 275327 +++$+++ 2010-06-14 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.276562820E09 +++$+++ Since you had left him a note, please let me know if you object to my action of blanking his talk page and protecting it. I was going to wait for another, but, frankly, I found the personal attacks he'd already launched just too egregious. :\/ -- +++$+++ ::::::Since you had left him a note, please let me know if you object to my action of blanking his talk page and protecting it. I was going to wait for another, but, frankly, I found the personal attacks he'd already launched just too egregious. :/ --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 17:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

13179 +++$+++ Jrcla2 +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311458340E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Abarenicola pacifica]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Abarenicola pacifica|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Abarenicola pacifica]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Abarenicola pacifica|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Jrcla2|Jrcla2]] ([[User talk:Jrcla2|talk]]) 14:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
13180 +++$+++ Cwmhiraeth +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13179 +++$+++ 13179 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.311535920E09 +++$+++ It all came about after reading a most interesting book from the public library entitled \"The Northwest Coast: A natural history.\" When I borrowed the book I thought it was going to be about northwest UK, where I live, but it turned out to be about the US and has stimulated me to write or add to several articles on interesting species that I had not encountered before.  +++$+++ :It all came about after reading a most interesting book from the public library entitled "The Northwest Coast: A natural history." When I borrowed the book I thought it was going to be about northwest UK, where I live, but it turned out to be about the US and has stimulated me to write or add to several articles on interesting species that I had not encountered before. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 12:32, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

537469 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537469 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-14 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.160810520E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_the_Great&diff=prev&oldid=81311108 this] may interest you. The user has a grand total of 3 edits at this point.  +++$+++ Hi Aldux, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_the_Great&diff=prev&oldid=81311108 this] may interest you. The user has a grand total of 3 edits at this point. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 00:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
537470 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537469 +++$+++ 537469 +++$+++ 2006-10-14 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.160812020E09 +++$+++ Yep, working on a RFCU right now.  +++$+++ :Yep, working on a RFCU right now. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 00:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

13183 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311578640E09 +++$+++ The DYK nomination system has changed and new nominations are supposed to be saved on their own subpages, not directly on [[T:TDYK]]; the subpage is then supposed to be linked to from [[T:TDYK]]. Therefore, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=441143799 this new nomination] you posted is incorrect. Please re-nominate by following the instructions at T:TDYK. Thank you, <b class=\"IPA\">[[Special:Contributions\/Rjanag|r<font color=\"#8B0000\">\u02a8<\/font>ana\u0262]]<\/b>&nbsp;( +++$+++ The DYK nomination system has changed and new nominations are supposed to be saved on their own subpages, not directly on [[T:TDYK]]; the subpage is then supposed to be linked to from [[T:TDYK]]. Therefore, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=441143799 this new nomination] you posted is incorrect. Please re-nominate by following the instructions at T:TDYK. Thank you, <b class="IPA">[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;([[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]) 00:24, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
13184 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Rcej +++$+++ 13183 +++$+++ 13183 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311578940E09 +++$+++ Never mind, I went ahead and fixed it. Please review my edits to make sure you understand how this works. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know\/SS_Eastern&oldid=441263136 Here] I created the nomination at its subpage (the page you were taken to when you clicked the \"Create nomination\" button at [[T:TDYK]]). [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=441263282 Here] I posted the nomination page to [[T:TDYK]]. If you have ever participated in [[WP:AFD]] or [[WP:MFD]], you will find the process is very similar to those. <b class=\"IPA\">[[Special:Contributions\/Rjanag|r<font color=\"#8B0000\">\u02a8<\/font>ana\u0262]]<\/b>&nbsp;( +++$+++ :Never mind, I went ahead and fixed it. Please review my edits to make sure you understand how this works. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know/SS_Eastern&oldid=441263136 Here] I created the nomination at its subpage (the page you were taken to when you clicked the "Create nomination" button at [[T:TDYK]]). [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=441263282 Here] I posted the nomination page to [[T:TDYK]]. If you have ever participated in [[WP:AFD]] or [[WP:MFD]], you will find the process is very similar to those. <b class="IPA">[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;([[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]) 00:29, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

275329 +++$+++ Rrburke +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275329 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-15 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.276590540E09 +++$+++ {{outdent|::::::}}Oh, Oh, Oh! \"QI\" means \"IQ\".  Yeah, ''you'' already knew that, but it came to ''me'' just now.  Yes, I'm slow.  +++$+++ {{outdent|::::::}}Oh, Oh, Oh! "QI" means "IQ".  Yeah, ''you'' already knew that, but it came to ''me'' just now.  Yes, I'm slow. [[User:Rrburke|-- Rrburke]] ([[User talk:Rrburke|talk]]) 01:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
275330 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275329 +++$+++ 275329 +++$+++ 2010-06-15 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.276600920E09 +++$+++ Hehe, I know; I had to think about that for a moment, too! I wasn't actually aware that koalas and kangaroos had assessable \"IQ's\" but I'm sure he knows what he's talking about! I wonder how they test them - \"Now, Mr Kangaroo, please calculate these equations then look at the diagrams and put them in the right order...and please don't kick me in the stomach again!\" :p  +++$+++ :Hehe, I know; I had to think about that for a moment, too! I wasn't actually aware that koalas and kangaroos had assessable "IQ's" but I'm sure he knows what he's talking about! I wonder how they test them - "Now, Mr Kangaroo, please calculate these equations then look at the diagrams and put them in the right order...and please don't kick me in the stomach again!" :p [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

275331 +++$+++ GregJackP +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-11 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.276292520E09 +++$+++ You may want to check out Nighteen Nightmares latest.  He's been removing references from the article - I reverted his edits, but fear this will continue.  I also entered an AIV report.  Regards,  +++$+++ You may want to check out Nighteen Nightmares latest.  He's been removing references from the article - I reverted his edits, but fear this will continue.  I also entered an AIV report.  Regards, [[User:GregJackP|GregJackP]] ([[User talk:GregJackP|talk]]) 14:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
275332 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275331 +++$+++ 275331 +++$+++ 2010-06-12 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.276340160E09 +++$+++ Thanks Greg. I see s\/he has been blocked but I'm hopeful that something positive will come from it. S\/he seems genuinely concerned with article quality which is a positive basis to work from going forward.  +++$+++ :Thanks Greg. I see s/he has been blocked but I'm hopeful that something positive will come from it. S/he seems genuinely concerned with article quality which is a positive basis to work from going forward. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
275333 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275331 +++$+++ 275331 +++$+++ 2010-06-12 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.276386420E09 +++$+++ Nineteen, if you ''do'' need help from any\/all helpers, please use the {{tn|helpme}} template on your '''own''' talk page, thanks.<small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ :Nineteen, if you ''do'' need help from any/all helpers, please use the {{tn|helpme}} template on your '''own''' talk page, thanks.<small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 16:47, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

537476 +++$+++ Spespatriae +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537476 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-15 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.160947920E09 +++$+++ Brutus and Judas lived 500 years later than Ephialtes. There is no periodical connection there and it is not even needed since each time period and culture has it's own historical example of the basic character of a traitor. Ephialtes is the mythical traitor of the anticent Greek history and    Brutus is the one for Imperial Rome, Judas for Christianity, Quisling for Norway and much of Western Europe under Nazis adn Kuusinen for Finns who fought the Soviets. In fact there should be a category for achtypes like traitors in history. Please, don't revert the changes. +++$+++ Brutus and Judas lived 500 years later than Ephialtes. There is no periodical connection there and it is not even needed since each time period and culture has it's own historical example of the basic character of a traitor. Ephialtes is the mythical traitor of the anticent Greek history and    Brutus is the one for Imperial Rome, Judas for Christianity, Quisling for Norway and much of Western Europe under Nazis adn Kuusinen for Finns who fought the Soviets. In fact there should be a category for achtypes like traitors in history. Please, don't revert the changes.[[User:Spespatriae|Spespatriae]] 14:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
537477 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537476 +++$+++ 537476 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.161156060E09 +++$+++ [[Benedict Arnold]] is probably the most natural eponym for treason in American English.  +++$+++ :[[Benedict Arnold]] is probably the most natural eponym for treason in American English. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 00:21, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

275334 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-13 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.276429800E09 +++$+++ '''Help re Don Martin (Public Affairs):'''   Sarah would you please look at the \"Accusations\" and \"Soapbox\" section on my user talk page [[User talk:Dmartinaus]] and give me your advice.  Thank you.   Also at Sections 11 and 14 the article page [[Talk:Don Martin (public affairs)]]  I am really frustrated and as you can see, and quite upset. Nineteen Nightmares has attacked my credibility reppeatedly and yet when I respond he takes great offense.  This is not what Wikipedia editing should be like, is it? I don't know what to do about it and I myself am getting incraesingly sarcastic, which is not the right response. I am tired of always being accused of \"gming the system\" and NN automtically assuming the worst about everything.  I get no benefit of the doubt.  -don martin    +++$+++ '''Help re Don Martin (Public Affairs):'''   Sarah would you please look at the "Accusations" and "Soapbox" section on my user talk page [[User talk:Dmartinaus]] and give me your advice.  Thank you.   Also at Sections 11 and 14 the article page [[Talk:Don Martin (public affairs)]]  I am really frustrated and as you can see, and quite upset. Nineteen Nightmares has attacked my credibility reppeatedly and yet when I respond he takes great offense.  This is not what Wikipedia editing should be like, is it? I don't know what to do about it and I myself am getting incraesingly sarcastic, which is not the right response. I am tired of always being accused of "gming the system" and NN automtically assuming the worst about everything.  I get no benefit of the doubt.  -don martin   [[User:Dmartinaus|Dmartinaus]] ([[User talk:Dmartinaus|talk]]) 04:50, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
275335 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275334 +++$+++ 275334 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.276432920E09 +++$+++ I read those comments earlier. I understand you're upset and I don't blame you - I can only imagine how stressful and upsetting the last few days have been. However, you wrote those comments on 11 June, prior to 19Nightmares' block. During and after the block 19Nightmares promised to stop the nastiness and start editing within policy. I haven't seen anything in his\/her comments today that makes me think that promised hasn't been honored. On Wikipedia, we use blocks and other administrative tools strictly preventatively, not punitively, so I can't do anything anything unless s\/he starts acting up again. I also can't take actions on things that happened prior to his\/her block because s\/he has already been blocked for that past behaviour. 19Nightmares seems to be making a genuine effort to edit appropriately and within policy and this is exactly what administrative intervention is geared to encourage - we want people who have been disruptive to \"wake up\" and become constructive members of the community. Also note that 19Nightmares has apologised to you at least a couple of times from what I have seen. I don't really see that any administrative intervention is required, but if you want me to look at specific incidents that have happened since the block finished, you're welcome to post [[WP:DIFF|diffs]] here and I will be happy to review them for you. If you are concerned that your own responses are becoming a bit snarky and sarcastic, perhaps it would be worth walking away from the site for a day or even just a few hours and coming back when you're feeling a bit better. This place can do anyone's head in and sometimes we all have to walk away and take a breather.  +++$+++ :I read those comments earlier. I understand you're upset and I don't blame you - I can only imagine how stressful and upsetting the last few days have been. However, you wrote those comments on 11 June, prior to 19Nightmares' block. During and after the block 19Nightmares promised to stop the nastiness and start editing within policy. I haven't seen anything in his/her comments today that makes me think that promised hasn't been honored. On Wikipedia, we use blocks and other administrative tools strictly preventatively, not punitively, so I can't do anything anything unless s/he starts acting up again. I also can't take actions on things that happened prior to his/her block because s/he has already been blocked for that past behaviour. 19Nightmares seems to be making a genuine effort to edit appropriately and within policy and this is exactly what administrative intervention is geared to encourage - we want people who have been disruptive to "wake up" and become constructive members of the community. Also note that 19Nightmares has apologised to you at least a couple of times from what I have seen. I don't really see that any administrative intervention is required, but if you want me to look at specific incidents that have happened since the block finished, you're welcome to post [[WP:DIFF|diffs]] here and I will be happy to review them for you. If you are concerned that your own responses are becoming a bit snarky and sarcastic, perhaps it would be worth walking away from the site for a day or even just a few hours and coming back when you're feeling a bit better. This place can do anyone's head in and sometimes we all have to walk away and take a breather. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

275336 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275336 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-13 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.276431900E09 +++$+++ '''Nighteen Nightmares''' - Holy cow I just went to his user talk page.   The accusations he makes are staggering.  Forgive my harsh response to him.  (I may indeed have to revert some of it later, but at midnight-thirty I am tired and angry.  See: [[User talk:Nineteen Nightmares]]   Don Martin    +++$+++ '''Nighteen Nightmares''' - Holy cow I just went to his user talk page.   The accusations he makes are staggering.  Forgive my harsh response to him.  (I may indeed have to revert some of it later, but at midnight-thirty I am tired and angry.  See: [[User talk:Nineteen Nightmares]]   Don Martin   [[User:Dmartinaus|Dmartinaus]] ([[User talk:Dmartinaus|talk]]) 05:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
275337 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275336 +++$+++ 275336 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.276432920E09 +++$+++ S\/he is not complaining or making accusations or trying to cause trouble with you. S\/he is doing I what ''I asked them to do''. When s\/he was blocked yesterday I asked that s\/he start by making a point-by-point list of issues they wanted to see addressed with the article. That's all that list is - it's not an assault on you personally but a wish-list of what they would like to see addressed. Most of the items seemed quite reasonable to me. I have no knowledge at all of Austin3301 so I can't comment about that but I found the comments about the articles - wanting to rename the page, verifying and assessing references, cleaning up the writing and so forth was all very reasonable. This is actually an example of one of the reasons why we advise article subjects to avoid becoming heavily involved in articles about themselves - it's natural to feel that everything is a personal assault when it's not actually intended personally. I'm sorry it has made you so angry but I can tell you that the list on 19Nightmares page is not anything personal - it's merely something I asked him\/her to do when s\/he was blocked to try to refocus his\/her editing on identifying specific issues s\/he had with the actual article rather than focusing on personalities.  +++$+++ :S/he is not complaining or making accusations or trying to cause trouble with you. S/he is doing I what ''I asked them to do''. When s/he was blocked yesterday I asked that s/he start by making a point-by-point list of issues they wanted to see addressed with the article. That's all that list is - it's not an assault on you personally but a wish-list of what they would like to see addressed. Most of the items seemed quite reasonable to me. I have no knowledge at all of Austin3301 so I can't comment about that but I found the comments about the articles - wanting to rename the page, verifying and assessing references, cleaning up the writing and so forth was all very reasonable. This is actually an example of one of the reasons why we advise article subjects to avoid becoming heavily involved in articles about themselves - it's natural to feel that everything is a personal assault when it's not actually intended personally. I'm sorry it has made you so angry but I can tell you that the list on 19Nightmares page is not anything personal - it's merely something I asked him/her to do when s/he was blocked to try to refocus his/her editing on identifying specific issues s/he had with the actual article rather than focusing on personalities. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
275338 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275336 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.276436100E09 +++$+++ I understand, except that many (most)of the statements NN makes in his\/her outline are absolutely not true, patently false, and in many cases seem to be made up entirely out of thin air. Hence my perceived need to refute them.  I am happy for the site to be renamed, vetted, references checked and the entire article edited by others. I am not trying to self-advertise as he claims. I am indeed an actual paid author of an honest-to-goodness real book.  I do want the site to stay up in whatever form, and I undestand it may not all be to my liking.  But I don't think anyone should expect me to stand by while completely untrue comments are made and potenially put into the article when, as the subject, I KNOW them to be false.   But for now I will take your advice and cool my heels and get out of the way.  I'm sure it is good advice and offered for my own good. Thanks    +++$+++ ::* I understand, except that many (most)of the statements NN makes in his/her outline are absolutely not true, patently false, and in many cases seem to be made up entirely out of thin air. Hence my perceived need to refute them.  I am happy for the site to be renamed, vetted, references checked and the entire article edited by others. I am not trying to self-advertise as he claims. I am indeed an actual paid author of an honest-to-goodness real book.  I do want the site to stay up in whatever form, and I undestand it may not all be to my liking.  But I don't think anyone should expect me to stand by while completely untrue comments are made and potenially put into the article when, as the subject, I KNOW them to be false.   But for now I will take your advice and cool my heels and get out of the way.  I'm sure it is good advice and offered for my own good. Thanks   [[User:Dmartinaus|Dmartinaus]] ([[User talk:Dmartinaus|talk]]) 06:35, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
275339 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275336 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 09:07:00 +++$+++ 1.276445220E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. I'm not saying that I think 19Nightmares is right about everything he wrote but I can accept it as a good faith effort to outline their perspective and their concerns about the article. Don't worry - I don't expect you to put up with untrue things being dropped into the article and as far as I'm concerned, the article will comply with the verifiability policy and only report what has already been published by the sources.  +++$+++ ::::Fair enough. I'm not saying that I think 19Nightmares is right about everything he wrote but I can accept it as a good faith effort to outline their perspective and their concerns about the article. Don't worry - I don't expect you to put up with untrue things being dropped into the article and as far as I'm concerned, the article will comply with the verifiability policy and only report what has already been published by the sources. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

89580 +++$+++  +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89580 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.309723620E09 +++$+++ Does the [[Chord chart]] article belong in the Category:Chords, please? What about the [[Roman numeral analysis]]? Thank you and best regards, Cote d'Azur 13:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ Does the [[Chord chart]] article belong in the Category:Chords, please? What about the [[Roman numeral analysis]]? Thank you and best regards, Cote d'Azur 13:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
89581 +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89580 +++$+++ 89580 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.309750080E09 +++$+++ Well, both articles have to do with chords, I suppose. I'm not sure what the criteria for inclusion in Category:Chords are supposed to be. On the other hand, both of those articles are very badly written. The Roman numeral analysis article, in particular, is both confusing (if it is about Roman numerals, why does it spend most of its time talking about Arabic numerals?) and makes inaccurate claims (carated Arabic numerals, for example, are not used in [[Schenkerian analysis]] for chord-root designators). I have been blissfully ignorant of both of these articles up until now, but thanks for bringing them to my attention.\u2014 +++$+++ :Well, both articles have to do with chords, I suppose. I'm not sure what the criteria for inclusion in Category:Chords are supposed to be. On the other hand, both of those articles are very badly written. The Roman numeral analysis article, in particular, is both confusing (if it is about Roman numerals, why does it spend most of its time talking about Arabic numerals?) and makes inaccurate claims (carated Arabic numerals, for example, are not used in [[Schenkerian analysis]] for chord-root designators). I have been blissfully ignorant of both of these articles up until now, but thanks for bringing them to my attention.—[[User:Jerome Kohl|Jerome Kohl]] ([[User talk:Jerome Kohl#top|talk]]) 20:28, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
89582 +++$+++  +++$+++ Jerome Kohl +++$+++ 89580 +++$+++ 89581 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Yes, they have to do with chords but the real subject of those articles is not chords, like in the rest of the topics on that list; one of them is about musical notation, obviously. I do not understand the criteria either, that is why I am asking. Thank you for looking into the matter and best wishes, Cote d'Azur 04:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ ::Yes, they have to do with chords but the real subject of those articles is not chords, like in the rest of the topics on that list; one of them is about musical notation, obviously. I do not understand the criteria either, that is why I am asking. Thank you for looking into the matter and best wishes, Cote d'Azur 04:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

275340 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275340 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-13 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.276496100E09 +++$+++ '''Fortunately these can actually be skimmed rather easily and quickly.'''   I added one note only (in green) as a preface to certain articles without editorializing, and I highlighted the relevant Don Martin sections in red to make it easy to find them quickly by skimming.  In reviewing the articles I now think that reference 9 can probably be deleted and replaced by 15;  and 25 can probably be deleted in favor of 26.  Please do let me know if you have looked at the web page.   Don Martin    +++$+++ '''Fortunately these can actually be skimmed rather easily and quickly.'''   I added one note only (in green) as a preface to certain articles without editorializing, and I highlighted the relevant Don Martin sections in red to make it easy to find them quickly by skimming.  In reviewing the articles I now think that reference 9 can probably be deleted and replaced by 15;  and 25 can probably be deleted in favor of 26.  Please do let me know if you have looked at the web page.   Don Martin   [[User:Dmartinaus|Dmartinaus]] ([[User talk:Dmartinaus|talk]]) 23:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
275341 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275340 +++$+++ 275340 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.276496520E09 +++$+++ With no accusations any longer toward Nightmare, I hope this will solve his statement that some of the articles \"have no mention of Martin at all.\"    +++$+++ :With no accusations any longer toward Nightmare, I hope this will solve his statement that some of the articles "have no mention of Martin at all."   [[User:Dmartinaus|Dmartinaus]] ([[User talk:Dmartinaus|talk]]) 23:22, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
275342 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275340 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-14 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.276519140E09 +++$+++ I have just now commented on some deletions and agreed with others on the article Talk page.  Carry on, and I'll make very brief comments if necessary on any future deletions, without reacting too much or being to sensitive. I am out of town Monday and most of Tuesday so will make no comments until then.  I did see some inadvertent errors and mistakes in the editing so far on the article itelf, as well as some excellent edits too.  +++$+++ ::::I have just now commented on some deletions and agreed with others on the article Talk page.  Carry on, and I'll make very brief comments if necessary on any future deletions, without reacting too much or being to sensitive. I am out of town Monday and most of Tuesday so will make no comments until then.  I did see some inadvertent errors and mistakes in the editing so far on the article itelf, as well as some excellent edits too. [[User:Dmartinaus|Dmartinaus]] ([[User talk:Dmartinaus|talk]]) 05:39, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

482797 +++$+++ TeckWiz +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.176885480E09 +++$+++ Hey Wknight94. Thanks for supporting my unsuccessful RFA this week. I hope to keep helping and improving Wikipedia alongside you. -- +++$+++ Hey Wknight94. Thanks for supporting my unsuccessful RFA this week. I hope to keep helping and improving Wikipedia alongside you. --[[User:TeckWiz|'''TeckWiz''']] <sup>[[User_talk:TeckWiz|Parlate]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/TeckWiz|Contribs]]<sub>[[Special:Emailuser/TeckWiz|@]]</sub>(Lets go Yankees!)</small> 01:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
482798 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482797 +++$+++ 482797 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.176890760E09 +++$+++ Read [[WP:PROD]].  Someone else proposed the article for deletion and you had five days to disagree.  You're more than four months late.  If you'd like it restored, let me know.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Read [[WP:PROD]].  Someone else proposed the article for deletion and you had five days to disagree.  You're more than four months late.  If you'd like it restored, let me know.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

275344 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275344 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-14 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.276540200E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Wmi-building.jpg]] was uploaded by {{Userlinks|Jherschel}}, I added the copyvio CSD but it was declined by {{Userlinks|Stifle}} on the grounds of ''[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File:Wmi-building.jpg&diff=367946817&oldid=367945236 there is a credible assertion that the image is freely-licensed]''. I tried discussing it but they don't care.  +++$+++ [[:File:Wmi-building.jpg]] was uploaded by {{Userlinks|Jherschel}}, I added the copyvio CSD but it was declined by {{Userlinks|Stifle}} on the grounds of ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Wmi-building.jpg&diff=367946817&oldid=367945236 there is a credible assertion that the image is freely-licensed]''. I tried discussing it but they don't care. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 11:30, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
275345 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275344 +++$+++ 275344 +++$+++ 2010-06-14 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.276541580E09 +++$+++ The user has submitted two OTRS permissions - one for the image and one for the logo. If you want to talk about it further, send me an email.  +++$+++ :The user has submitted two OTRS permissions - one for the image and one for the logo. If you want to talk about it further, send me an email. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 11:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

275346 +++$+++ Ravensfire +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-14 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.276555980E09 +++$+++ Probably shouldn't have responded as I did on the talk page, but it was enjoyable to fire back a bit.  I'm taking it off of my watch list, rather than risk continuing the fight on my side.  Not even sure if locking the page would help, as he'd probably find another page to hit.  I looked at the IP's used on the talk page, main article and all related articles and they are all from Vodafone.  Probably not much more to be done except ignore him and wait for them to give up.  I glanced at the article and gave up even skimming.  Concur about the probable use of a translator program - that's just awful prose!  Will try later on to cut stuff out of the article or merge some sections.  Good luck with this! <b><font color=\"darkred\"> +++$+++ Probably shouldn't have responded as I did on the talk page, but it was enjoyable to fire back a bit.  I'm taking it off of my watch list, rather than risk continuing the fight on my side.  Not even sure if locking the page would help, as he'd probably find another page to hit.  I looked at the IP's used on the talk page, main article and all related articles and they are all from Vodafone.  Probably not much more to be done except ignore him and wait for them to give up.  I glanced at the article and gave up even skimming.  Concur about the probable use of a translator program - that's just awful prose!  Will try later on to cut stuff out of the article or merge some sections.  Good luck with this! <b><font color="darkred">[[User:Ravensfire|Ravensfire]]</font></b> <font color="black">([[User talk:Ravensfire|talk]])</font> 15:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
275347 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275346 +++$+++ 275346 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.276686420E09 +++$+++ I noticed that person during the AFD and looked at their edits then. I think it is extremely likely they are associated with the subject and Dmartinaus seems to acknowledge this is very likely. The problem I am seeing is the AFD was deeply affected by COI editors. A very significant portion of the editors who !voted on the AFD are either the subject or people connected with him. It would make things so much easier if such people just stayed out of it and left it to experienced Wikipedians to resolve. I agree that the article should go back to AFD if the issues can't be resolved and if notability can't be clearly established. However, the AFD only closed four days ago and I think it would be way too fast to go back there right now. It would be helpful if you could quote the exact sentences or phrases (not here but on the article's talk page) that you think are advertising\/promotional. I - and others - can't really comment without knowing the exact quotes that you're talking about.  +++$+++ :I noticed that person during the AFD and looked at their edits then. I think it is extremely likely they are associated with the subject and Dmartinaus seems to acknowledge this is very likely. The problem I am seeing is the AFD was deeply affected by COI editors. A very significant portion of the editors who !voted on the AFD are either the subject or people connected with him. It would make things so much easier if such people just stayed out of it and left it to experienced Wikipedians to resolve. I agree that the article should go back to AFD if the issues can't be resolved and if notability can't be clearly established. However, the AFD only closed four days ago and I think it would be way too fast to go back there right now. It would be helpful if you could quote the exact sentences or phrases (not here but on the article's talk page) that you think are advertising/promotional. I - and others - can't really comment without knowing the exact quotes that you're talking about. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

537491 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-23 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.161588360E09 +++$+++ Check your e-mail please.  +++$+++ Check your e-mail please. [[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">•N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>•</span>]] 00:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
537492 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537491 +++$+++ 537491 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.161629760E09 +++$+++ Ok, resent. :-)  +++$+++ :Ok, resent. :-) [[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">•N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>•</span>]] 11:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
537493 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537491 +++$+++ 537492 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.161633900E09 +++$+++ Again per your instructions (response to yours).  +++$+++ ::Again per your instructions (response to yours). [[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">•N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>•</span>]] 13:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
537494 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537491 +++$+++ 537493 +++$+++ 2006-10-24 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.161703920E09 +++$+++ It is important that I send you this. Kindly check if you can fix, or open a gmail account and change your preferences. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::It is important that I send you this. Kindly check if you can fix, or open a gmail account and change your preferences. Thanks. [[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">•N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>•</span>]] 08:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

275351 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-15 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.276664040E09 +++$+++ Personally I see nothing wrong or scandalous about ANY of these edits except for the change to the lawsuit section about which he is probably unaware of previous closure of this issue. '''Contratry to Nightmare's assertion, I can't find a single one that add an \"advertising\" element to the article.'''    This strikes me like the other false allegations that were subsquently proven to be without merit. If I'm wrong, Nightmare, (who claims that these edits consitute more advertising) then you should specifically point each  edit and how it constitutes \"advertising\" below this paragraph so everyone can see and decide.  +++$+++ Personally I see nothing wrong or scandalous about ANY of these edits except for the change to the lawsuit section about which he is probably unaware of previous closure of this issue. '''Contratry to Nightmare's assertion, I can't find a single one that add an "advertising" element to the article.'''    This strikes me like the other false allegations that were subsquently proven to be without merit. If I'm wrong, Nightmare, (who claims that these edits consitute more advertising) then you should specifically point each  edit and how it constitutes "advertising" below this paragraph so everyone can see and decide. [[User:Dmartinaus|Dmartinaus]] ([[User talk:Dmartinaus|talk]]) 21:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
275352 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275351 +++$+++ 275351 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.276685880E09 +++$+++ Just going on what you're saying - I haven't had a chance to look at the actual edits yet - but a lot of these sound reasonable. I agree that it shouldn't say \"published\" if you weren't the publisher. Some of these items seem kind of strange things to be fighting over though (but as I said, I haven't had a chance to look at the actual edits yet).  +++$+++ :Just going on what you're saying - I haven't had a chance to look at the actual edits yet - but a lot of these sound reasonable. I agree that it shouldn't say "published" if you weren't the publisher. Some of these items seem kind of strange things to be fighting over though (but as I said, I haven't had a chance to look at the actual edits yet). [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

13208 +++$+++ ImageTaggingBot +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13208 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-15 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.245083880E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your cooperation. -- +++$+++ Thank you for your cooperation. --[[User:ImageTaggingBot|ImageTaggingBot]] ([[User talk:ImageTaggingBot|talk]]) 09:38, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
13209 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13208 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-16 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.245153060E09 +++$+++ It all looks fine to me. The permission, Author and Source fields are all filled in correctly. I have added some more detail to avoid any doubt about it.  +++$+++ :* It all looks fine to me. The permission, Author and Source fields are all filled in correctly. I have added some more detail to avoid any doubt about it. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 04:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

275353 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-15 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.276664580E09 +++$+++ Just to clarify, here is what Nightmare said about the edits above to Sarah:  \"language that quite obviously favors the man and his various businesses, including information which in effect '''advertises them for free on Wikipedia.\"'''    +++$+++ Just to clarify, here is what Nightmare said about the edits above to Sarah:  "language that quite obviously favors the man and his various businesses, including information which in effect '''advertises them for free on Wikipedia."'''   [[User:Dmartinaus|Dmartinaus]] ([[User talk:Dmartinaus|talk]]) 22:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
275354 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275353 +++$+++ 275353 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.276685880E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure what 19Nightmates is referring to here. If they can be more specific about the actual language they view as problematic, we can address that and see if there is more appropriate language. It's a bit hard to say without specific diffs and quotes to look at.  +++$+++ :I'm not sure what 19Nightmates is referring to here. If they can be more specific about the actual language they view as problematic, we can address that and see if there is more appropriate language. It's a bit hard to say without specific diffs and quotes to look at. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

13212 +++$+++ Tom walker +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13212 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-28 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.248831240E09 +++$+++ Hey. I just wanted to point out that [[:File:East West Rail Consortium Western map.jpg]] has the Milton Keynes Central label against Wolverton station, not MKC. Also the entire Milton Keynes urban area is missing! It should completely fill the area between Wolverton, Bletchley and Newport Pagnell.  +++$+++ Hey. I just wanted to point out that [[:File:East West Rail Consortium Western map.jpg]] has the Milton Keynes Central label against Wolverton station, not MKC. Also the entire Milton Keynes urban area is missing! It should completely fill the area between Wolverton, Bletchley and Newport Pagnell. [[User:Tom walker|Tom walker]] ([[User talk:Tom walker|talk]]) 18:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
13213 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13212 +++$+++ 13212 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.248874500E09 +++$+++ Fixed. Thanks.  +++$+++ * Fixed. Thanks. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 06:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
13214 +++$+++ John Maynard Friedman +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13212 +++$+++ 13212 +++$+++ 2010-07-08 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.278618060E09 +++$+++ I see that this has been raised before. There are five stations in [[Milton Keynes]].  Where the map has \"Milton Keynes\", is that meant to be the [[Milton Keynes]]? or [[Milton Keynes Central railway station]]?  Also, as per Tom's comment above, the yellow splodges don't match to anything real world in at least the last 30 years. Please see this map for the current reality. -- +++$+++ : I see that this has been raised before. There are five stations in [[Milton Keynes]].  Where the map has "Milton Keynes", is that meant to be the [[Milton Keynes]]? or [[Milton Keynes Central railway station]]?  Also, as per Tom's comment above, the yellow splodges don't match to anything real world in at least the last 30 years. Please see this map for the current reality. --[[User:John Maynard Friedman|John Maynard Friedman]] ([[User talk:John Maynard Friedman|talk]]) 12:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

13215 +++$+++ Sladen +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-23 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.253761680E09 +++$+++ The map at [[:File:Cambridgeshire guided busway.png]] is slightly wrong as it shows the busway extending from the Science Park to the railway line (that part of the railway corridor is unused and remains as railway property).  Could you provide an instruction list for regenerating the image and\/or upload the original SVG version that will allow editing.  Many Thanks, \u2014 +++$+++ The map at [[:File:Cambridgeshire guided busway.png]] is slightly wrong as it shows the busway extending from the Science Park to the railway line (that part of the railway corridor is unused and remains as railway property).  Could you provide an instruction list for regenerating the image and/or upload the original SVG version that will allow editing.  Many Thanks, —[[User:Sladen|Sladen]] ([[User talk:Sladen|talk]]) 20:08, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
13216 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13215 +++$+++ 13215 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.254000720E09 +++$+++ Thanks - now fixed. I haven't got SVG export sorted out so I have just uploaded a new png.  +++$+++ * Thanks - now fixed. I haven't got SVG export sorted out so I have just uploaded a new png. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 14:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

537504 +++$+++ Miskin +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537504 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.162016220E09 +++$+++ Hi aldux, I was wondering why the article [[Carapelli]] links to an american food company. As for the discussions in 'Italian people', you should propose to remove all references about X people being similar to Y in order to avoid POVs. That's how it was decided in 'Greeks' and the article has been peaceful ever since. I'm suggesting it for Italians too but nobody listens, they keep fixed to their POVs.  +++$+++ Hi aldux, I was wondering why the article [[Carapelli]] links to an american food company. As for the discussions in 'Italian people', you should propose to remove all references about X people being similar to Y in order to avoid POVs. That's how it was decided in 'Greeks' and the article has been peaceful ever since. I'm suggesting it for Italians too but nobody listens, they keep fixed to their POVs. [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 23:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
537505 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537504 +++$+++ 537504 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.162018740E09 +++$+++ It would seem that in the USA Carapelli is a subsidiary of this Hormel food company; a company I have honestly never have heard of, while the name Carapelli is quite known in Italy, and they do a lot of publicity. As for [[Italian people]], it's a lot of time I've not given a look at the article; I'll do tomorrow, as now I really have to go to sleep. Ciao,-- +++$+++ :It would seem that in the USA Carapelli is a subsidiary of this Hormel food company; a company I have honestly never have heard of, while the name Carapelli is quite known in Italy, and they do a lot of publicity. As for [[Italian people]], it's a lot of time I've not given a look at the article; I'll do tomorrow, as now I really have to go to sleep. Ciao,--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 23:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

13217 +++$+++ WWGB +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-03 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.254571080E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}<\/code> to '''the top of [[:Proposed split for Transport content|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or \"db\" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Proposed split for Transport content|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you.<!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom -->  +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Proposed split for Transport content|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Proposed split for Transport content|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you.<!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:WWGB|WWGB]] ([[User talk:WWGB|talk]]) 04:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
13218 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13217 +++$+++ 13217 +++$+++ 2009-10-03 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.254589620E09 +++$+++ Thanks. It was a mistake as noted in the last comment in the change history - It was created automatically by my my inexperience when I added a 'split section' tag into the transport section of the Luton article.  +++$+++ *Thanks. It was a mistake as noted in the last comment in the change history - It was created automatically by my my inexperience when I added a 'split section' tag into the transport section of the Luton article. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 10:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

13220 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-07 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.262858100E09 +++$+++ cheers  +++$+++ cheers [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 01:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
13221 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13220 +++$+++ 13220 +++$+++ 2010-01-08 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.262949540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 03:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
13222 +++$+++ Sladen +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13220 +++$+++ 13221 +++$+++ 2010-01-08 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.262951640E09 +++$+++ Most of the real OSM editing is done offline using the more heavyweight JOSM editor and keeping a copy of [[:openstreetmap:Map Features]] open.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::Most of the real OSM editing is done offline using the more heavyweight JOSM editor and keeping a copy of [[:openstreetmap:Map Features]] open.  —[[User:Sladen|Sladen]] ([[User talk:Sladen|talk]]) 03:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
13223 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13220 +++$+++ 13222 +++$+++ 2010-01-08 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.262972820E09 +++$+++ Map features is certainly useful, however I would recommend online editor (called Potlatch) which one accesses simply by pressing the edit button. I would suggest that to start by adding road and paths in your area in they are still missing (using highway=residential, highway=footway etc as detailed on the map features page). It is also sensible to start by adding points of interest such as letter boxes, pubs, churches and shops. To add road you would need a GPS unit with the ability to transfer it to the computer. Agreed it is not as simple as editing Wikipedia for the novice but certainly worth learning if you are interested in transport stuff. +++$+++ :::Map features is certainly useful, however I would recommend online editor (called Potlatch) which one accesses simply by pressing the edit button. I would suggest that to start by adding road and paths in your area in they are still missing (using highway=residential, highway=footway etc as detailed on the map features page). It is also sensible to start by adding points of interest such as letter boxes, pubs, churches and shops. To add road you would need a GPS unit with the ability to transfer it to the computer. Agreed it is not as simple as editing Wikipedia for the novice but certainly worth learning if you are interested in transport stuff.[[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 09:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

13226 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-09 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.268175600E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 15:00, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
13227 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13226 +++$+++ 13226 +++$+++ 2010-03-09 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.268186700E09 +++$+++ response given on talk-Coren.  +++$+++ :response given on talk-Coren. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 18:05, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

13228 +++$+++ Ronhjones +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-15 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.268640360E09 +++$+++ In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the [[Help:Moving a page|\"Move\" tab]] at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect]] from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested moves]] to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at [[Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-c&pmove--> ''' +++$+++ In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the [[Help:Moving a page|"Move" tab]] at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect]] from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested moves]] to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at [[Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-c&pmove--> '''[[User:Ronhjones|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:black; padding:1px;background:yellow"><font color="green">&nbsp;Ron<font color="red">h</font>jones&nbsp;</font></span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Ronhjones|&nbsp;(Talk)]]</sup> 01:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
13229 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13228 +++$+++ 13228 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.284460800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the feedback and advice. The issue has now been resolved which was incidentally part of a pretty complicated bit of re-knitting involving a number of articles and many redirects to make more sense of the whole Advocacy subject area.  +++$+++ : Thanks for the feedback and advice. The issue has now been resolved which was incidentally part of a pretty complicated bit of re-knitting involving a number of articles and many redirects to make more sense of the whole Advocacy subject area. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 03:40, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

13231 +++$+++ DeFacto +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13231 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-07 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.270678440E09 +++$+++ I refute and resent the allegations you have made about me on [[User talk:DeFacto#Repeated removal of road casualty data from Speed limit article |my talk page]].  Please concentrate on removing [[wp:or]] from your contributions and please assume [[wp:goodfaith|good faith]] on my part.  I have patiently corrected\/removed\/coomented upon your personal POV and personal synthesis laced edits.  Please read the appropriate policies and review your actions and accusations. --  +++$+++ I refute and resent the allegations you have made about me on [[User talk:DeFacto#Repeated removal of road casualty data from Speed limit article |my talk page]].  Please concentrate on removing [[wp:or]] from your contributions and please assume [[wp:goodfaith|good faith]] on my part.  I have patiently corrected/removed/coomented upon your personal POV and personal synthesis laced edits.  Please read the appropriate policies and review your actions and accusations. -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 15:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
13232 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13231 +++$+++ 13231 +++$+++ 2010-04-07 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.270679580E09 +++$+++ Clearly if I felt they were unfounded then I wouldn't have made them. See discussion on [[talk:Overspill parking]] and [[talk:Speed limit]] and [[talk:Double-yellow line]] for the various parallel issues I am responding to.  +++$+++ :Clearly if I felt they were unfounded then I wouldn't have made them. See discussion on [[talk:Overspill parking]] and [[talk:Speed limit]] and [[talk:Double-yellow line]] for the various parallel issues I am responding to. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 15:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

13233 +++$+++ DeFacto +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-26 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.272304140E09 +++$+++ I see you are still doing it.  Please stop being so disruptive - is is not acceptable to attempt to smear other editors as a means to help preserve your personal, non-netral POV in articles. --  +++$+++ I see you are still doing it.  Please stop being so disruptive - is is not acceptable to attempt to smear other editors as a means to help preserve your personal, non-netral POV in articles. -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 10:49, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
13234 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13233 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-26 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.272305820E09 +++$+++ I left a clear explanation of my position on your talk page and also on [[talk:Speed limit]] where there is discussion of your recent edits by various parties. Clearly we differ on what is POV and what is reality and others seem to have the same concerns about your 'angle' on this. Lets see how it shakes out.  +++$+++ :*I left a clear explanation of my position on your talk page and also on [[talk:Speed limit]] where there is discussion of your recent edits by various parties. Clearly we differ on what is POV and what is reality and others seem to have the same concerns about your 'angle' on this. Lets see how it shakes out. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 11:17, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

275378 +++$+++ GregJackP +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-19 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.276994580E09 +++$+++ I have referred Nineteen Nightmares for personal attacks and incivility at [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Pattern_of_Personal_Attacks_by_Nineteen_Nightmares]].  Since you have been involved in this matter, I believe that it is appropriate for you to be made aware of this matter.  Regards,  +++$+++ I have referred Nineteen Nightmares for personal attacks and incivility at [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Pattern_of_Personal_Attacks_by_Nineteen_Nightmares]].  Since you have been involved in this matter, I believe that it is appropriate for you to be made aware of this matter.  Regards, [[User:GregJackP|GregJackP]] ([[User talk:GregJackP|talk]]) 17:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
275379 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275378 +++$+++ 275378 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.277019060E09 +++$+++ Wow, okay, that seems rather premature but I haven't been closely following developments over the last few days. I thought you were doing much better since the block but it looks like you might have slipped since they AFD'd the newspaper article. I think you might need to acknowledge on ANI that you recognise that and agree to go under a civility parole. Which would mean that you agree to comply with the [[WP:CIVIL|civility]] policy and if you violate it, you'll be blocked in incrementally increasing blocks. I would also advise you to not get sucked into arguing with them on AFD - it's really not going to be to your benefit as it makes uninvolved people unwilling to bother with it if they have to trawl through long arguments. You can't be banned on the basis of a so-called \"consensus\" of people so deeply involved in disputes with you. There must be a consensus of uninvolved and uninvested people.  +++$+++ :Wow, okay, that seems rather premature but I haven't been closely following developments over the last few days. I thought you were doing much better since the block but it looks like you might have slipped since they AFD'd the newspaper article. I think you might need to acknowledge on ANI that you recognise that and agree to go under a civility parole. Which would mean that you agree to comply with the [[WP:CIVIL|civility]] policy and if you violate it, you'll be blocked in incrementally increasing blocks. I would also advise you to not get sucked into arguing with them on AFD - it's really not going to be to your benefit as it makes uninvolved people unwilling to bother with it if they have to trawl through long arguments. You can't be banned on the basis of a so-called "consensus" of people so deeply involved in disputes with you. There must be a consensus of uninvolved and uninvested people. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:31, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
275380 +++$+++ Tyrenius +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275378 +++$+++ 275379 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.277104260E09 +++$+++ Just for the record regarding my hostility as stated above.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Tyrenius&diff=361358244&oldid=361121342] ''''' +++$+++ ::Just for the record regarding my hostility as stated above.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tyrenius&diff=361358244&oldid=361121342] '''''[[User:Tyrenius|<font color="#880088">Ty</font>]]''''' 00:11, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275381 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275378 +++$+++ 275379 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.277034540E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I agree, I didn't read that was a threat but a warning about the reality of how the press love to create front page scandals out of that type of thing. There have been plenty of cases where people have done the wrong thing on Wikipedia and it's ended up being a scandal in the press. And I've actually thought several times myself that I hope Martin understand this, which is why I kept telling him that I hoped he understood that his actions here are publicly viewable. The problem really isn't the central message you are trying to share but the language you use. Wikipedia's behavioural policies are pretty clear about requiring people to be civil and if you continue being aggressive, abrasive and uncivil, it's just a matter of time before you do get banned. If you're right about people going after you, you're just playing into their hands and making it easier for them by snarking back at them. Don't give them any excuses and if you feel angry or you think someone's an idiot and you want to let loose on them, it can be best just to walk away from the computer for a while and come back when you've cooled off. I do that all the time!  I've got to go offline now but I'm hoping that the involved people will back off now and allow uninvolved people to review and address the issues raised there.  +++$+++ ::Yeah, I agree, I didn't read that was a threat but a warning about the reality of how the press love to create front page scandals out of that type of thing. There have been plenty of cases where people have done the wrong thing on Wikipedia and it's ended up being a scandal in the press. And I've actually thought several times myself that I hope Martin understand this, which is why I kept telling him that I hoped he understood that his actions here are publicly viewable. The problem really isn't the central message you are trying to share but the language you use. Wikipedia's behavioural policies are pretty clear about requiring people to be civil and if you continue being aggressive, abrasive and uncivil, it's just a matter of time before you do get banned. If you're right about people going after you, you're just playing into their hands and making it easier for them by snarking back at them. Don't give them any excuses and if you feel angry or you think someone's an idiot and you want to let loose on them, it can be best just to walk away from the computer for a while and come back when you've cooled off. I do that all the time!  I've got to go offline now but I'm hoping that the involved people will back off now and allow uninvolved people to review and address the issues raised there. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

13235 +++$+++ DeFacto +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13235 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-26 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.272305100E09 +++$+++ Peter, I noticed that you wrote [[user talk:DeFacto#POV pushing|here]] that you edit (the same?) articles under more than one user-id.  Will you please list the ids that you use and explain the reasons and the circumstances for this behaviour to pre-empt any accusations of [[wp:sock puppet]]try that may otherwise arise from editors looking for a way to discredit you. --  +++$+++ Peter, I noticed that you wrote [[user talk:DeFacto#POV pushing|here]] that you edit (the same?) articles under more than one user-id.  Will you please list the ids that you use and explain the reasons and the circumstances for this behaviour to pre-empt any accusations of [[wp:sock puppet]]try that may otherwise arise from editors looking for a way to discredit you. -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 11:05, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
13236 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13235 +++$+++ 13235 +++$+++ 2010-04-26 11:13:00 +++$+++ 1.272305580E09 +++$+++ My original user name potentially caused confusion between me and my company. After consultation with others in the company I switched to use this name over a year ago I believe and since then never used the old one again. The old name was [[User:PeterIto]]. I hope that clears up any concerns. I will add that I find the question un-necessary and yet another use of the wikipedia rules to try and win an argument.  +++$+++ *My original user name potentially caused confusion between me and my company. After consultation with others in the company I switched to use this name over a year ago I believe and since then never used the old one again. The old name was [[User:PeterIto]]. I hope that clears up any concerns. I will add that I find the question un-necessary and yet another use of the wikipedia rules to try and win an argument. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 11:13, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
13237 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13235 +++$+++ 13236 +++$+++ 2010-04-26 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.272307260E09 +++$+++ As per an earlier query, could you please add some information about who you are and where you are coming from to your user page. Currently it is pretty much blank.  +++$+++ :* As per an earlier query, could you please add some information about who you are and where you are coming from to your user page. Currently it is pretty much blank. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 11:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

13238 +++$+++ DeFacto +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-28 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.272488400E09 +++$+++ Peter, I've decided to put this here first rather than to make a fuss over it yet in any article talk page.  As you know, there are several reasons why parking on double yellow lines might not be illegal.  Also, you probably realise that many people will probably be able to identify car drivers from car number plates.  Perhaps you would like to read [[WP:LIBEL|this]] and [[WP:CARPIX|this (#8)]] and possibly reconsider the wording in the caption of a certain image, and possibly replacing or at least blurring certain parts of the image itself. --  +++$+++ Peter, I've decided to put this here first rather than to make a fuss over it yet in any article talk page.  As you know, there are several reasons why parking on double yellow lines might not be illegal.  Also, you probably realise that many people will probably be able to identify car drivers from car number plates.  Perhaps you would like to read [[WP:LIBEL|this]] and [[WP:CARPIX|this (#8)]] and possibly reconsider the wording in the caption of a certain image, and possibly replacing or at least blurring certain parts of the image itself. -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 14:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
13239 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13238 +++$+++ 13238 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.272489540E09 +++$+++ Thank you for pointing of the [[WP:CARPIX]] guidance, I will blur the numberplate. I will also consider the other issue and respond as I see appropriate.  +++$+++ *Thank you for pointing of the [[WP:CARPIX]] guidance, I will blur the numberplate. I will also consider the other issue and respond as I see appropriate. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 14:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

439113 +++$+++ Magidin +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-15 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.195179120E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Nina_Totenberg&diff=171577028&oldid=171499840 assist] on [[Nina Totenberg]]. All the recent edits are from the same guy (at least, a revers DNS look-up suggests so), and I did not want to be the only one reverting him (even setting aside [[WP:3RR|3RR]]).  +++$+++ Thank you for your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nina_Totenberg&diff=171577028&oldid=171499840 assist] on [[Nina Totenberg]]. All the recent edits are from the same guy (at least, a revers DNS look-up suggests so), and I did not want to be the only one reverting him (even setting aside [[WP:3RR|3RR]]). [[User:Magidin|Magidin]] 18:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
439114 +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439113 +++$+++ 439113 +++$+++ 2007-11-15 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.195189800E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. By the way, if the conflict continues I personally would be happy with the wording \"attended Boston University for X years\" if that makes anyone happier. I don't know what the value of X is, though.  +++$+++ *You're welcome. By the way, if the conflict continues I personally would be happy with the wording "attended Boston University for X years" if that makes anyone happier. I don't know what the value of X is, though. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] [[User_talk:dpbsmith|(talk)]] 21:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
439115 +++$+++ Magidin +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439113 +++$+++ 439113 +++$+++ 2007-11-15 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.195191780E09 +++$+++ Or, for that matter, since this is an attempt at criticism, what they should do is find some reliable source that criticizes or lauds Totenberg for her lack of credentials and cite ''that''. The examples this one person brought up (Hannity and Limbaugh) are like that; Limbaugh says \"attended\", and then has citations about his poor performance and his dropping out. Hannity has \"dropped out for financial reasons\", and quotes Hannity and other interviews on this (as it is meant to be a positive, not a negative, on his character). But it does not seem to be about \"neutrality\" or \"improvement\", but rather about dumping on the subject, and trying to cast it as \"liberal vs. conservative.\" Sigh.  +++$+++ :Or, for that matter, since this is an attempt at criticism, what they should do is find some reliable source that criticizes or lauds Totenberg for her lack of credentials and cite ''that''. The examples this one person brought up (Hannity and Limbaugh) are like that; Limbaugh says "attended", and then has citations about his poor performance and his dropping out. Hannity has "dropped out for financial reasons", and quotes Hannity and other interviews on this (as it is meant to be a positive, not a negative, on his character). But it does not seem to be about "neutrality" or "improvement", but rather about dumping on the subject, and trying to cast it as "liberal vs. conservative." Sigh. [[User:Magidin|Magidin]] 21:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
439116 +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439113 +++$+++ 439115 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.195276200E09 +++$+++ I was about to say that myself, but held back in the interest of [[WP:AGF]].  +++$+++ ::I was about to say that myself, but held back in the interest of [[WP:AGF]]. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] [[User_talk:dpbsmith|(talk)]] 21:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

13240 +++$+++ Eeekster +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-29 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.272557280E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}<\/code> to '''the top of [[:File:Flights20April2010.png|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or \"db\" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[File talk:Flights20April2010.png|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  <!-- Template:Db-dbimgcopyvio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom -->  +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:File:Flights20April2010.png|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[File talk:Flights20April2010.png|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  <!-- Template:Db-dbimgcopyvio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Eeekster|Eeekster]] ([[User talk:Eeekster|talk]]) 09:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
13241 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13240 +++$+++ 13240 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.284460500E09 +++$+++ The note was indeed placed in error and the issue has now been resolved.  +++$+++ :The note was indeed placed in error and the issue has now been resolved. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 03:35, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

275386 +++$+++ Soap +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-20 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.277081460E09 +++$+++ I'm a bit nervous, as a new admin, and I just blocked a user for creating hoax articles after a final warning.  Do you think that an indefinite block was good, or is that going too far?  The user is {{user|Okfaizok}}.  ''' +++$+++ I'm a bit nervous, as a new admin, and I just blocked a user for creating hoax articles after a final warning.  Do you think that an indefinite block was good, or is that going too far?  The user is {{user|Okfaizok}}.  '''[[User:Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]][[User talk:Soap|<font color="057602">''Soap''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]]''' 17:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
275387 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275386 +++$+++ 275386 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.277101800E09 +++$+++ Greetings Soap. No, I don't think it's going too far to indef someone hoaxing, but let me take a look at this particular account and I'll be back shortly with an opinion. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Greetings Soap. No, I don't think it's going too far to indef someone hoaxing, but let me take a look at this particular account and I'll be back shortly with an opinion. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 23:30, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
275388 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275386 +++$+++ 275386 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.277105160E09 +++$+++ Soap, I didn't realise you were talking about ''that'' guy. Absolutely, that block is completely acceptable and appropriate. I was a bit stupid giving him another chance and not just indefing him in the first place. Given he's come back since I deleted his other junk and created more, there's no doubt in my mind that is a very good and appropriate block. Congratulations on your RFA. If you have any future blocks or other actions you want a second opinion on, please feel free to post here. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Soap, I didn't realise you were talking about ''that'' guy. Absolutely, that block is completely acceptable and appropriate. I was a bit stupid giving him another chance and not just indefing him in the first place. Given he's come back since I deleted his other junk and created more, there's no doubt in my mind that is a very good and appropriate block. Congratulations on your RFA. If you have any future blocks or other actions you want a second opinion on, please feel free to post here. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:26, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275389 +++$+++ Soap +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275386 +++$+++ 275388 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.277106420E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I was basing my action on what I'd seen other admins do in similar situations, but just wanted to be sure.  ''' +++$+++ ::Thank you. I was basing my action on what I'd seen other admins do in similar situations, but just wanted to be sure.  '''[[User:Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]][[User talk:Soap|<font color="057602">''Soap''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]]''' 00:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

13244 +++$+++ Imzadi1979 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-14 10:15:00 +++$+++ 1.281806100E09 +++$+++ I've undone some of your changes. Lane configurations are properly part of the Route description. As that section is fleshed out, the configurations information is incorporated into prose form and interwoven with a more detailed description of the path the highway takes, making that bulleted list obsolete. In fact for a highway of this length, a good route description will be about five times the current length and divided geographically into subsections. Any major \"incidents\", are properly a part of the history of the roadway. I also recombined things back together in the history. There were several one- and two-sentence paragraphs created, yet when recombined it is clear that all the information came from a single source. Otherwise each separated sentence losing its attachment to a reference. Additionally, single sentence paragraphs are generally a bad writing style. <span style=\"background:green; padding:2px\">''' +++$+++ I've undone some of your changes. Lane configurations are properly part of the Route description. As that section is fleshed out, the configurations information is incorporated into prose form and interwoven with a more detailed description of the path the highway takes, making that bulleted list obsolete. In fact for a highway of this length, a good route description will be about five times the current length and divided geographically into subsections. Any major "incidents", are properly a part of the history of the roadway. I also recombined things back together in the history. There were several one- and two-sentence paragraphs created, yet when recombined it is clear that all the information came from a single source. Otherwise each separated sentence losing its attachment to a reference. Additionally, single sentence paragraphs are generally a bad writing style. <span style="background:green; padding:2px">'''[[User:Imzadi1979|<font color="white">Imzadi</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Imzadi1979|<font color="white">1979</font>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Imzadi1979|<font color="white"><big>→</big></font>]]'''</span>  10:15, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
13245 +++$+++ Imzadi1979 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13244 +++$+++ 13244 +++$+++ 2010-08-15 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.281869940E09 +++$+++ Some of the changes you've made that I've reverted may seem petty, but they're all designed to keep the articles in line with project standards. Those standards are at [[WP:USRD\/STDS]]. If you have any questions, ask. I also reverted the lead sentence of the I-75 article. This formatting style was hammered out when another state-detail article on a different Interstate Highway went through FAC and passed. That format uses the hatnote at the top of the article to link to the parent article, so that the designation name can appear in bold. The first sentence also gives an overview that the whole of I-75 runs from X to Y, but in Michigan it runs from A to B. <span style=\"background:green; padding:2px\">''' +++$+++ :Some of the changes you've made that I've reverted may seem petty, but they're all designed to keep the articles in line with project standards. Those standards are at [[WP:USRD/STDS]]. If you have any questions, ask. I also reverted the lead sentence of the I-75 article. This formatting style was hammered out when another state-detail article on a different Interstate Highway went through FAC and passed. That format uses the hatnote at the top of the article to link to the parent article, so that the designation name can appear in bold. The first sentence also gives an overview that the whole of I-75 runs from X to Y, but in Michigan it runs from A to B. <span style="background:green; padding:2px">'''[[User:Imzadi1979|<font color="white">Imzadi</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Imzadi1979|<font color="white">1979</font>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Imzadi1979|<font color="white"><big>→</big></font>]]'''</span>  03:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
13246 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13244 +++$+++ 13245 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.284460440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note. I have no issue with your further edits.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the note. I have no issue with your further edits. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 03:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

275390 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-21 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.277135760E09 +++$+++ Just noticed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Australian_Labor_Party&curid=1495&diff=369323758&oldid=369321221 Nick-D reverted] an edit made by {{Userlinks|Draftpunkboy94}} on the Australian Labor Party article, I had a feeling that the editor was Draftpunk93 but though they must have requested a rename but looking the the editor's contributions which shocked me as an a new account. I took a look at {{Userlinks|Draftpunkboy93}} and noted that they have been indefinitely blocked so I did a search on [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~mzmcbride\/cgi-bin\/wikistalk.py?namespace=0&user1=Daftpunkboy93&user2=Daftpunkboy94&user3=&user4=&user5=&user6=&user7=&user8=&user9=&user10= Wikistalk] which shows it is the same editor. Not sure what should be done with the editor.  +++$+++ Just noticed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Australian_Labor_Party&curid=1495&diff=369323758&oldid=369321221 Nick-D reverted] an edit made by {{Userlinks|Draftpunkboy94}} on the Australian Labor Party article, I had a feeling that the editor was Draftpunk93 but though they must have requested a rename but looking the the editor's contributions which shocked me as an a new account. I took a look at {{Userlinks|Draftpunkboy93}} and noted that they have been indefinitely blocked so I did a search on [http://toolserver.org/~mzmcbride/cgi-bin/wikistalk.py?namespace=0&user1=Daftpunkboy93&user2=Daftpunkboy94&user3=&user4=&user5=&user6=&user7=&user8=&user9=&user10= Wikistalk] which shows it is the same editor. Not sure what should be done with the editor. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 08:56, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275391 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275390 +++$+++ 275390 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.277137740E09 +++$+++ Are you sure this is correct, Bidgee? I can't find any contribs or block log for either of those accounts. Are they indef'd here on WP? If someone has been indef'd and they've just come back with a new account, they need to be reblocked as block evading sock.  +++$+++ :Are you sure this is correct, Bidgee? I can't find any contribs or block log for either of those accounts. Are they indef'd here on WP? If someone has been indef'd and they've just come back with a new account, they need to be reblocked as block evading sock. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:29, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275392 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275390 +++$+++ 275391 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.277137800E09 +++$+++ Never mind, I've found him through the article. Looking now...  +++$+++ ::Never mind, I've found him through the article. Looking now... [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:30, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275393 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275390 +++$+++ 275392 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 09:44:00 +++$+++ 1.277138640E09 +++$+++ Okay I've blocked him. By the way, it's {{Userlinks|Daftpunkboy94}} not Draftpunkboy94, you dag! :p  +++$+++ :::Okay I've blocked him. By the way, it's {{Userlinks|Daftpunkboy94}} not Draftpunkboy94, you dag! :p [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275394 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275390 +++$+++ 275393 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.277141220E09 +++$+++ Oops! LOL, Still a little tired from the 48 hour flu\/virus (must have got it from Melbourne). Cheers for looking into it.  +++$+++ ::::Oops! LOL, Still a little tired from the 48 hour flu/virus (must have got it from Melbourne). Cheers for looking into it. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 10:27, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275395 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275390 +++$+++ 275394 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.277149560E09 +++$+++ You're most welcome as always. There's a lot of bugs going around Melbourne at the moment, probably because of the weather. I hope you get better soon. I'm going to be doing a Wikm\/pedia training program for the curators at the Melb Museum on Thursday. I've got some promotional stuff (pins, stickers etc) from the foundation but I'm writing the training pack myself and it's the first time I've done one. I probably won't be around much this week but if anything else comes up, feel free to leave a note here. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::::You're most welcome as always. There's a lot of bugs going around Melbourne at the moment, probably because of the weather. I hope you get better soon. I'm going to be doing a Wikm/pedia training program for the curators at the Melb Museum on Thursday. I've got some promotional stuff (pins, stickers etc) from the foundation but I'm writing the training pack myself and it's the first time I've done one. I probably won't be around much this week but if anything else comes up, feel free to leave a note here. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275396 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275390 +++$+++ 275395 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.277151300E09 +++$+++ I'm feeling better today, weather wasn't too bad when I was down there. I was at the [[:File:Melbourne Museum interior 1.jpg|Melbourne Museum]] on Saturday and the [[RAAF Museum]] the day before. Never got the chance to do the photography I wanted to do due to the tight itinerary, but I want to head back down in spring. I hope all goes well on Thursday!  +++$+++ ::::::I'm feeling better today, weather wasn't too bad when I was down there. I was at the [[:File:Melbourne Museum interior 1.jpg|Melbourne Museum]] on Saturday and the [[RAAF Museum]] the day before. Never got the chance to do the photography I wanted to do due to the tight itinerary, but I want to head back down in spring. I hope all goes well on Thursday! [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 13:15, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275397 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275390 +++$+++ 275396 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.277189280E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Fortunately it's only a small group of curators (about 12) but it's still rather nerve-racking! Until I went to a Wikimedia meeting at the Melb Museum with Brian, Liam and Steven Bain a few months ago, I hadn't been there for years. So long, in fact, that I'd never even been to the new building! Were you doing a placement there? My parents are involved with the local museum down here and dad said they've had a student working with the archivists as a placement for her museum course. If you have any spare time next time you're down, let me know and I'll come into town and we can get a coffee or something. I actually have a few things to send you from the WMF meeting in Germany. Nothing exciting but just a couple of things I picked up which you might be interested in. I shall email you about it next week. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::::::Thanks! Fortunately it's only a small group of curators (about 12) but it's still rather nerve-racking! Until I went to a Wikimedia meeting at the Melb Museum with Brian, Liam and Steven Bain a few months ago, I hadn't been there for years. So long, in fact, that I'd never even been to the new building! Were you doing a placement there? My parents are involved with the local museum down here and dad said they've had a student working with the archivists as a placement for her museum course. If you have any spare time next time you're down, let me know and I'll come into town and we can get a coffee or something. I actually have a few things to send you from the WMF meeting in Germany. Nothing exciting but just a couple of things I picked up which you might be interested in. I shall email you about it next week. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 23:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275398 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275390 +++$+++ 275397 +++$+++ 2010-06-22 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.277190360E09 +++$+++ Oh, by the way, I think I might have forgotten to tell you that a few days ago I turned the extra [[Wikipedia:Reviewing|reviewer]] rights on for you. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:UserRights\/Bidgee]  +++$+++ ::::::::Oh, by the way, I think I might have forgotten to tell you that a few days ago I turned the extra [[Wikipedia:Reviewing|reviewer]] rights on for you. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:UserRights/Bidgee] [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:06, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
275399 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275390 +++$+++ 275398 +++$+++ 2010-06-22 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.277231700E09 +++$+++ also thank you for the extra user rights. :)  +++$+++ :::::::::also thank you for the extra user rights. :) [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 11:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

13247 +++$+++ Od Mishehu +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-30 08:44:00 +++$+++ 1.283183040E09 +++$+++ Pleas enote that, if you create a page or upload a file, you can easily have it deleted by tagging '''it''' with a {{tl|db-self}} tag. Please also note that in case of any speedy deletion request, you tag the page itself, not its talk page.  +++$+++ Pleas enote that, if you create a page or upload a file, you can easily have it deleted by tagging '''it''' with a {{tl|db-self}} tag. Please also note that in case of any speedy deletion request, you tag the page itself, not its talk page. [[User:Od Mishehu|עוד&nbsp;מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu|Od&nbsp;Mishehu]] 08:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
13248 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13247 +++$+++ 13247 +++$+++ 2010-08-30 08:45:00 +++$+++ 1.283183100E09 +++$+++ Thanks, will do that next time.  +++$+++ :Thanks, will do that next time. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 08:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

13249 +++$+++ unforgettableid +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13249 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-12 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.284303360E09 +++$+++ Hi.  Thank you for adding OpenStreetMap images to Wikipedia.  But they use the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license, not the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license as you have indicated.  Could you please fix the license information on the images you've uploaded?  Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi.  Thank you for adding OpenStreetMap images to Wikipedia.  But they use the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license, not the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license as you have indicated.  Could you please fix the license information on the images you've uploaded?  Cheers, [[User:Unforgettableid|Unforgettableid]] ([[User talk:Unforgettableid|talk]]) 07:56, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
13250 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13249 +++$+++ 13249 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.284310320E09 +++$+++ I don't think that it is necessary to do so given that one is allowed to re-publish ccbysa 2.0 works under a later license with the same terms - to quote from the legal text: \"You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License, a later version of this License with the same License Elements as this License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the same License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Japan\"[http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode]? I read 'later version of the same license' to include version 3.0.  +++$+++ : I don't think that it is necessary to do so given that one is allowed to re-publish ccbysa 2.0 works under a later license with the same terms - to quote from the legal text: "You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License, a later version of this License with the same License Elements as this License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the same License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Japan"[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode]? I read 'later version of the same license' to include version 3.0. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 09:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
13251 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13249 +++$+++ 13249 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.284310500E09 +++$+++ (Moved from Unforgettableid's talk page) Thanks for your comment on my talk page re licensing of cc-by-sa works. I have responded to your comment on my talk page as I believe the licensing that I have used is fine. Can you please respond there to keep the thread in one place. Many thanks.  +++$+++ : (Moved from Unforgettableid's talk page) Thanks for your comment on my talk page re licensing of cc-by-sa works. I have responded to your comment on my talk page as I believe the licensing that I have used is fine. Can you please respond there to keep the thread in one place. Many thanks. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern|talk]]) 09:55, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
13252 +++$+++ unforgettableid +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13249 +++$+++ 13251 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.284346080E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ :: Cheers, [[User:Unforgettableid|Unforgettableid]] ([[User talk:Unforgettableid|talk]]) 19:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
13253 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13249 +++$+++ 13252 +++$+++ 2010-09-13 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.284377520E09 +++$+++ Just to say, firstly I am unclear which map you are referring to as I have uploaded many osm maps to Wikipedia over the past two years. Secondly I believe that it is a valid interpretation of the license to consider all of them to be derived works in that they are at least subsets of the whole chosen by me for a particular purpose and in most cases I have annotated them with other content making them more unambiguously derived. For the avoidance of doubt possibly in future I should given myself as the author and osm as a source. Anyway... I am not trying to be awkward, I am just not want to create a load of work for myself if it is not necessary and believe the licensing is ok. Let me know what you think.  +++$+++ ::: Just to say, firstly I am unclear which map you are referring to as I have uploaded many osm maps to Wikipedia over the past two years. Secondly I believe that it is a valid interpretation of the license to consider all of them to be derived works in that they are at least subsets of the whole chosen by me for a particular purpose and in most cases I have annotated them with other content making them more unambiguously derived. For the avoidance of doubt possibly in future I should given myself as the author and osm as a source. Anyway... I am not trying to be awkward, I am just not want to create a load of work for myself if it is not necessary and believe the licensing is ok. Let me know what you think. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 04:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
13254 +++$+++ Sladen +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13249 +++$+++ 13253 +++$+++ 2010-09-13 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.284378900E09 +++$+++ There's generally a difference between \"you may distribute this under X or later\" and \"you may ''alter this message'' to a new licence that says only X+1 or later\";  the latter is modifying the licence on the work itself (which is generally not allowed), in the same way as claiming that somebody else's work is your own is not allowed\u2014even if it is in the Public Domain (it is still somebody else's work, just as it is somebody else's licence).  \u2014 +++$+++ :::: There's generally a difference between "you may distribute this under X or later" and "you may ''alter this message'' to a new licence that says only X+1 or later";  the latter is modifying the licence on the work itself (which is generally not allowed), in the same way as claiming that somebody else's work is your own is not allowed—even if it is in the Public Domain (it is still somebody else's work, just as it is somebody else's licence).  —[[User:Sladen|Sladen]] ([[User talk:Sladen|talk]]) 04:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
13255 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13249 +++$+++ 13254 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.284460320E09 +++$+++ Is this the map that is causing difficulty? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:East_West_Rail_Consortium_Central_map.jpg]. I note that it has been moved to commons or something because I can't edit the description? The authorship is not clear, however I can confirm that I am the author.  +++$+++ ::::: Is this the map that is causing difficulty? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:East_West_Rail_Consortium_Central_map.jpg]. I note that it has been moved to commons or something because I can't edit the description? The authorship is not clear, however I can confirm that I am the author. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 03:32, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
13256 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13249 +++$+++ 13254 +++$+++ 2010-09-13 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.284378000E09 +++$+++ (Moved from Unforgettableid's talk page) I have replied again on my talk page. fyi, I haven't 'moved' the whole conversation here as per your request because I a not clear how that would work. Are you requesting that I 'move' the conversation here and therefor delete it from my page or to 'copy' it and create two versions of the same text? Both are unfamiliar approaches to me.  +++$+++ ::::: (Moved from Unforgettableid's talk page) I have replied again on my talk page. fyi, I haven't 'moved' the whole conversation here as per your request because I a not clear how that would work. Are you requesting that I 'move' the conversation here and therefor delete it from my page or to 'copy' it and create two versions of the same text? Both are unfamiliar approaches to me. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern|talk]]) 04:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
13257 +++$+++ unforgettableid +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13249 +++$+++ 13256 +++$+++ 2010-09-16 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.284686340E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ :::::: Cheers, [[User:Unforgettableid|Unforgettableid]] ([[User talk:Unforgettableid|talk]]) 18:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
13258 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13249 +++$+++ 13251 +++$+++ 2010-10-08 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.286570160E09 +++$+++ I have not made any further edits beyond rolling back your original edits as I mentioned on your talk page and then re-integrated some of the new content that I felt belonged in the main TD article. Content added to the TD article that relates to the portal probably needs to be reviewed in respect to the current TD Portal article.  +++$+++ ::I have not made any further edits beyond rolling back your original edits as I mentioned on your talk page and then re-integrated some of the new content that I felt belonged in the main TD article. Content added to the TD article that relates to the portal probably needs to be reviewed in respect to the current TD Portal article. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 13:36, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

308043 +++$+++ StudyAndBeWise +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-26 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.169811060E09 +++$+++ Dave, I tried to address some concerns I had recently.  These concerns, and a pointer to the diff in which I address only some of them, can be found at the discussion here:  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Creation-evolution_controversy#Napoleonic_wars]  +++$+++ Dave, I tried to address some concerns I had recently.  These concerns, and a pointer to the diff in which I address only some of them, can be found at the discussion here:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Creation-evolution_controversy#Napoleonic_wars] [[User:StudyAndBeWise|StudyAndBeWise]] 03:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
308044 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308043 +++$+++ 308043 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 08:31:00 +++$+++ 1.169829060E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for letting me know, your development of the article is much appreciated and I'll try to clarify things in a way that meets your concerns. ..  +++$+++ :Thanks very much for letting me know, your development of the article is much appreciated and I'll try to clarify things in a way that meets your concerns. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 08:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

537541 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-22 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.164267540E09 +++$+++ I was reading [[Greek frappe]], and came to the quote where it talks about \"espresso freddo\", \"capuccino freddo\" (aka freddoccino). I've repeatedly tried to drink (whatever) cold coffee in Italy, and I always end up ...explaining the recipe to the startled waiter (not to mention that the end result always sucks). On the other hand, I've been drinking these in Greece since maybe 10 years now. Is it that frequent in Italy? I'd go [[WP:BOLD|bold]], but I thought I should ask you first...  +++$+++ I was reading [[Greek frappe]], and came to the quote where it talks about "espresso freddo", "capuccino freddo" (aka freddoccino). I've repeatedly tried to drink (whatever) cold coffee in Italy, and I always end up ...explaining the recipe to the startled waiter (not to mention that the end result always sucks). On the other hand, I've been drinking these in Greece since maybe 10 years now. Is it that frequent in Italy? I'd go [[WP:BOLD|bold]], but I thought I should ask you first... [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 23:39, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
537542 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537541 +++$+++ 537541 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.164370620E09 +++$+++ I've always wanted to know something more about that:). i know well that drinking coffee is by no means a greek invention, but, is frappe only a \"greek thing\"? or maybe is it included in the various kinds of coffee served in Italy (primarily, since we have many italian kinds of coffee) or elsewhere?  +++$+++ :I've always wanted to know something more about that:). i know well that drinking coffee is by no means a greek invention, but, is frappe only a "greek thing"? or maybe is it included in the various kinds of coffee served in Italy (primarily, since we have many italian kinds of coffee) or elsewhere? [[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 04:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
537543 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537541 +++$+++ 537542 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.164412320E09 +++$+++ Frappe is documented to be Greek. I was asking about capuccino\/espresso freddo. Last time in Firenze I was served footwash! So the question is simple: Do you have it? Have you seen it before?  +++$+++ ::Frappe is documented to be Greek. I was asking about capuccino/espresso freddo. Last time in Firenze I was served footwash! So the question is simple: Do you have it? Have you seen it before? [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 15:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
537544 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537541 +++$+++ 537543 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.164413880E09 +++$+++ Sorry Niko, I hadn't immediately noticed your post. The awnser to your question is very simple: absolutely no, simply the idea of drinking cold coffee seems weird to me, I've never drunk personally a cold coffee in all my life, neither has anybody in my family; except, obviously, the originally boiling espresso is served cold because of the bar's sloppiness, and then it's really disgusting.-- +++$+++ :::Sorry Niko, I hadn't immediately noticed your post. The awnser to your question is very simple: absolutely no, simply the idea of drinking cold coffee seems weird to me, I've never drunk personally a cold coffee in all my life, neither has anybody in my family; except, obviously, the originally boiling espresso is served cold because of the bar's sloppiness, and then it's really disgusting.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
537545 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537541 +++$+++ 537544 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.164501000E09 +++$+++ I knew that was the case, but didn't want to push this so far initially. Freddo in Greece is second most popular coffee after frappe (well, according to my [[WP:OR]] that is). I'll make a picture, and if you find it attractive, I'll tell you the (easy) recipe.  +++$+++ ::::I knew that was the case, but didn't want to push this so far initially. Freddo in Greece is second most popular coffee after frappe (well, according to my [[WP:OR]] that is). I'll make a picture, and if you find it attractive, I'll tell you the (easy) recipe. [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 16:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
537546 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537541 +++$+++ 537545 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.164871200E09 +++$+++ As promised, check photo and tell me if it is tempting! :-)  +++$+++ :::::As promised, check photo and tell me if it is tempting! :-) [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 23:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
537547 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537541 +++$+++ 537546 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.164876720E09 +++$+++ The photo makes it tempting, I admit, but in all honesty, the thought of drinking cold coffee is something that my stomach can't resist. Also, I'm first of all a tea-drinker (which makes me a real outcast in a coffee-mad country like Italy ;-)). Ciao,-- +++$+++ ::::::The photo makes it tempting, I admit, but in all honesty, the thought of drinking cold coffee is something that my stomach can't resist. Also, I'm first of all a tea-drinker (which makes me a real outcast in a coffee-mad country like Italy ;-)). Ciao,--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 00:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

275400 +++$+++ Technopat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-20 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.277097600E09 +++$+++ Greetings Sarah - just a [shortish] word of support in the face of opposition. Assuming good faith, I realise that your talk page is being <s>stalked<\/s> watched by beady little eyes and trust to my guardian angels here at Wikipedia to keep an eye out for any possible repercussions. Be that as it may, in my somewhat superficial and random tracking of the events leading up to the current issue involving Nineteen Nightmares, I find your attitude and correspondence with the parties involved to be in full keeping with what I've come to expect from admins, and for which I'd just like to say thank you, and a more global thank you for being out there to ensure that Wikipedia doesn't degenerate into the Wild West. It restores my sometimes flagging faith in Wikipedia AGF and ego trips. I'd also like to seize the oportunity to point out that you seem to be under the impression that I'm a member of the lobby to have this editor blocked. A quick review of the ANI and other, related pages (don't bother) will make it clear that such is not the case. While I have been openly critical of said editor's behaviour, I consider the almost orchestrated manoeuvre by more experienced editors fully unwarranted (see \"flagging faith\" above). This message will self-destruct the moment you have read it. Cheers! -- +++$+++ Greetings Sarah - just a [shortish] word of support in the face of opposition. Assuming good faith, I realise that your talk page is being <s>stalked</s> watched by beady little eyes and trust to my guardian angels here at Wikipedia to keep an eye out for any possible repercussions. Be that as it may, in my somewhat superficial and random tracking of the events leading up to the current issue involving Nineteen Nightmares, I find your attitude and correspondence with the parties involved to be in full keeping with what I've come to expect from admins, and for which I'd just like to say thank you, and a more global thank you for being out there to ensure that Wikipedia doesn't degenerate into the Wild West. It restores my sometimes flagging faith in Wikipedia AGF and ego trips. I'd also like to seize the oportunity to point out that you seem to be under the impression that I'm a member of the lobby to have this editor blocked. A quick review of the ANI and other, related pages (don't bother) will make it clear that such is not the case. While I have been openly critical of said editor's behaviour, I consider the almost orchestrated manoeuvre by more experienced editors fully unwarranted (see "flagging faith" above). This message will self-destruct the moment you have read it. Cheers! --[[User:Technopat|Technopat]] ([[User talk:Technopat|talk]]) 22:20, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
275401 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275400 +++$+++ 275400 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.277119380E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, Technopat, I really appreciate your message very much. Don't worry, I know that you're not part of this group (I also know that PdCook isn't) and I didn't mean to imply or suggest you were; I was just pointing out that you were among the people Greg notified of the WQA (which became the ANI). \"While I have been openly critical of said editor's behaviour, I consider the almost orchestrated manoeuvre by more experienced editors fully unwarranted\" - I agree completely and that's *exactly* where I'm coming from. I have also been very critical of the user's behaviour, and I'm not trying to protect him from the consequences of his continuing to be so aggressively uncivil after numerous warnings from a number of people, including myself, but I just couldn't accept the way they were setting that up, trying to quickly push through such a very excessive penalty for a relatively new (8 weeks) and generally inexperienced user they've been heavily involved in arguments and disputes with for weeks. If the uninvolved community decides a penalty or sanction of some sort is appropriate, so be it, but let's just do it properly and fairly and ensure it is within the requirements of policy - that's all I'm asking and if I had to put myself in their firing-line and become the target of their anger, assumptions of bad faith, misleading and false accusations and whatnot in order to highlight what was going on there then I can live with that. The thing that really alarmed me was when I went straight to ANI yesterday after receiving Greg's notification of the ANI report and found that a very involved user, who was also the person proposing and shepherding the block and ban, was already declaring a \"snowball\" block\/ban only 2 hours after it was proposed, with all but one of the comments being from people who were either involved in the disputes in some way or otherwise notified of the discussion by Greg. I just couldn't abide that and had to challenge them. I'm sorry they feel that I'm being nasty to them as that's not my desire or intention. But the crazy thing is I only became involved in this whole situation in the first place because they all kept coming here, leaving me messages and asking me to help with things. Yet once I disagree with their maneuvering and get in their way, I'm suddenly an evil and abusive admin! I'm not going to be here much this week as I'm very busy irl, but I'm sure the admin who closes the ANI will see it for what it is and ensure any penalties are fair and consistent with policy. Thank you again for your message, I really appreciate it a great deal. And if you encounter any problems, please do let me know.  +++$+++ :Thank you very much, Technopat, I really appreciate your message very much. Don't worry, I know that you're not part of this group (I also know that PdCook isn't) and I didn't mean to imply or suggest you were; I was just pointing out that you were among the people Greg notified of the WQA (which became the ANI). "While I have been openly critical of said editor's behaviour, I consider the almost orchestrated manoeuvre by more experienced editors fully unwarranted" - I agree completely and that's *exactly* where I'm coming from. I have also been very critical of the user's behaviour, and I'm not trying to protect him from the consequences of his continuing to be so aggressively uncivil after numerous warnings from a number of people, including myself, but I just couldn't accept the way they were setting that up, trying to quickly push through such a very excessive penalty for a relatively new (8 weeks) and generally inexperienced user they've been heavily involved in arguments and disputes with for weeks. If the uninvolved community decides a penalty or sanction of some sort is appropriate, so be it, but let's just do it properly and fairly and ensure it is within the requirements of policy - that's all I'm asking and if I had to put myself in their firing-line and become the target of their anger, assumptions of bad faith, misleading and false accusations and whatnot in order to highlight what was going on there then I can live with that. The thing that really alarmed me was when I went straight to ANI yesterday after receiving Greg's notification of the ANI report and found that a very involved user, who was also the person proposing and shepherding the block and ban, was already declaring a "snowball" block/ban only 2 hours after it was proposed, with all but one of the comments being from people who were either involved in the disputes in some way or otherwise notified of the discussion by Greg. I just couldn't abide that and had to challenge them. I'm sorry they feel that I'm being nasty to them as that's not my desire or intention. But the crazy thing is I only became involved in this whole situation in the first place because they all kept coming here, leaving me messages and asking me to help with things. Yet once I disagree with their maneuvering and get in their way, I'm suddenly an evil and abusive admin! I'm not going to be here much this week as I'm very busy irl, but I'm sure the admin who closes the ANI will see it for what it is and ensure any penalties are fair and consistent with policy. Thank you again for your message, I really appreciate it a great deal. And if you encounter any problems, please do let me know. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275402 +++$+++ Technopat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275400 +++$+++ 275401 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.277134680E09 +++$+++ Greetings Sarah - thanks for reply. I wish my reason for posting here had been to thank you for helping me out with a doubt or some such mundane matter. Whereas I have nothing to lose by being politically incorrect at Wikipedia, the thing that cracks me up is that some folks have little boxes on their talk pages optimistically expressing their admin potential. I've recently been toying with the idea of patrolling RfA on a regular basis, when there's a lull in vandal edits. And don't worry 'bout me 'cos my Wikipedia guardian angels work 25\/8, but I don't really expect any comeback. This message will self-destruct the moment you have read it. No reply required. ''Don't let 'em get to you!'' Cheers! -- +++$+++ ::Greetings Sarah - thanks for reply. I wish my reason for posting here had been to thank you for helping me out with a doubt or some such mundane matter. Whereas I have nothing to lose by being politically incorrect at Wikipedia, the thing that cracks me up is that some folks have little boxes on their talk pages optimistically expressing their admin potential. I've recently been toying with the idea of patrolling RfA on a regular basis, when there's a lull in vandal edits. And don't worry 'bout me 'cos my Wikipedia guardian angels work 25/8, but I don't really expect any comeback. This message will self-destruct the moment you have read it. No reply required. ''Don't let 'em get to you!'' Cheers! --[[User:Technopat|Technopat]] ([[User talk:Technopat|talk]]) 08:38, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275403 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275400 +++$+++ 275402 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.277137680E09 +++$+++ Heh we used to joke about those userboxes and how they were a guarantee you'd never become an admin. RFA can be a very unpleasant place but reading and participating in other people's RFA can be very useful in helping prepare for it yourself and even if you decide not to have a try yourself, the more people reviewing RFAs the better. I'm just grateful that I went through mine years ago as I'd hate to go through it now. It was hard enough back then but these days people seem to have got really tough standards. If at any time you decide you want to have a go at RFA yourself and you'd like someone to have a look at your contribs and give you an honest opinion about how they think you'd go, let me know and I'd be happy to do a review for you. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Heh we used to joke about those userboxes and how they were a guarantee you'd never become an admin. RFA can be a very unpleasant place but reading and participating in other people's RFA can be very useful in helping prepare for it yourself and even if you decide not to have a try yourself, the more people reviewing RFAs the better. I'm just grateful that I went through mine years ago as I'd hate to go through it now. It was hard enough back then but these days people seem to have got really tough standards. If at any time you decide you want to have a go at RFA yourself and you'd like someone to have a look at your contribs and give you an honest opinion about how they think you'd go, let me know and I'd be happy to do a review for you. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
275404 +++$+++ Technopat +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275400 +++$+++ 275403 +++$+++ 2010-06-22 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.277260200E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for the offer - greatly appreciated (and good for the ego), but I spend enough time here just <s>trolling<\/s> (Gadzooks! Of course I meant [[Wikipedia:WikiGnome|gnoming]]) around and thankful that I can put my foot in it occasionally without any serious comeback. I just can't commit myself to the level required of an admin. I see it as way too many headaches! Happy editing! -- +++$+++ ::::Many thanks for the offer - greatly appreciated (and good for the ego), but I spend enough time here just <s>trolling</s> (Gadzooks! Of course I meant [[Wikipedia:WikiGnome|gnoming]]) around and thankful that I can put my foot in it occasionally without any serious comeback. I just can't commit myself to the level required of an admin. I see it as way too many headaches! Happy editing! --[[User:Technopat|Technopat]] ([[User talk:Technopat|talk]]) 19:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

585287 +++$+++ EJF +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-01 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.207103400E09 +++$+++ Um Acalamari... you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FMrFish&diff=202611917&oldid=202610990 may have some explaining to do]... ;-) Cheers,  +++$+++ Um Acalamari... you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FMrFish&diff=202611917&oldid=202610990 may have some explaining to do]... ;-) Cheers, [[User:EJF|EJF]] ([[User talk:EJF|talk]]) 19:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
585288 +++$+++ Bellatrix Kerrigan +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585287 +++$+++ 585287 +++$+++ 2008-04-01 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.207105320E09 +++$+++ Heh! Thanks for telling me! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]]  +++$+++ :Heh! Thanks for telling me! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] [[User:Bellatrix Kerrigan|Bellatrix!]] 20:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
585289 +++$+++ EJF +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585287 +++$+++ 585288 +++$+++ 2008-04-01 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.207105920E09 +++$+++ No problem, didn't fancy getting involved in an edit war to restore it ;-) I had to restore my own as well... :) Regards,  +++$+++ ::No problem, didn't fancy getting involved in an edit war to restore it ;-) I had to restore my own as well... :) Regards, [[User:EJF|EJF]] ([[User talk:EJF|talk]]) 20:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
585290 +++$+++ Bellatrix Kerrigan +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585287 +++$+++ 585289 +++$+++ 2008-04-01 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.207106040E09 +++$+++ I've restored my own support. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]]  +++$+++ :::I've restored my own support. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] [[User:Bellatrix Kerrigan|Bellatrix!]] 20:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
585291 +++$+++ MrFish +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585287 +++$+++ 585288 +++$+++ 2008-04-01 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.207105800E09 +++$+++ Darn! You got me good!  I'm glad of course, though.  Wow, totally pwned!-- +++$+++ ::Darn! You got me good!  I'm glad of course, though.  Wow, totally pwned!--[[User:MrFish|MrFish]]<sup>[[User talk:MrFish|Go Fish]]</sup> 20:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
585292 +++$+++ Bellatrix Kerrigan +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585287 +++$+++ 585291 +++$+++ 2008-04-01 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.207106040E09 +++$+++ Don't worry. :) Just some harmless humor. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]]  +++$+++ :::Don't worry. :) Just some harmless humor. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] [[User:Bellatrix Kerrigan|Bellatrix!]] 20:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

13259 +++$+++ EdJogg +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13259 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-09 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.286689380E09 +++$+++ Hi. The new second sentence of the lede seems to end prematurely (''\"...all contained very restricted measures for car.\"'').  Perhaps you were interrupted while editing? Could you have another look please, as I didn't want to second-guess how the sentence should end. Cheers --  +++$+++ Hi. The new second sentence of the lede seems to end prematurely (''"...all contained very restricted measures for car."'').  Perhaps you were interrupted while editing? Could you have another look please, as I didn't want to second-guess how the sentence should end. Cheers -- [[User:EdJogg|EdJogg]] ([[User talk:EdJogg|talk]]) 22:43, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
13260 +++$+++ EdJogg +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13259 +++$+++ 13259 +++$+++ 2010-10-11 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.286825520E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ :Thank you. [[User:EdJogg|EdJogg]] ([[User talk:EdJogg|talk]]) 12:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

13261 +++$+++ EdJogg +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13261 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-11 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.286824620E09 +++$+++ Hi. Just done a quick copy-edit on [[Locomotives on Highways Act 1896]] and noticed that one of your refs is broken. It's bright red, so you can't miss it! --  +++$+++ Hi. Just done a quick copy-edit on [[Locomotives on Highways Act 1896]] and noticed that one of your refs is broken. It's bright red, so you can't miss it! -- [[User:EdJogg|EdJogg]] ([[User talk:EdJogg|talk]]) 12:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
13262 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13261 +++$+++ 13261 +++$+++ 2010-10-24 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.287969060E09 +++$+++ Fixed. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Fixed. Thanks. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 18:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
13263 +++$+++ Eddaido +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13261 +++$+++ 13262 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.298871120E09 +++$+++ Hi, just left a note for you on that talk page  +++$+++ ::Hi, just left a note for you on that talk page [[User:Eddaido|Eddaido]] ([[User talk:Eddaido|talk]]) 21:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

13264 +++$+++ Acather96 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-24 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.287968640E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of [[:File:Detoit book depository trees.jpg|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or \"db\", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[File talk:Detoit book depository trees.jpg|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these administrators]] to request that the administrator [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-noncom-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom -->  +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of [[:File:Detoit book depository trees.jpg|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[File talk:Detoit book depository trees.jpg|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these administrators]] to request that the administrator [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-noncom-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Acather96|Acather96]] ([[User talk:Acather96|talk]]) 18:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
13265 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13264 +++$+++ 13264 +++$+++ 2010-10-24 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.287969000E09 +++$+++ Agreed - I was in the process of adding a author speedy delete myself. My mistake, I had only checked that it allowed commercial use, not that it allowed derivatives. I have also marked [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:Detroit_Book_Depository_interior.jpg Detroit_Book_Depository_interior] for deletion.  +++$+++ :Agreed - I was in the process of adding a author speedy delete myself. My mistake, I had only checked that it allowed commercial use, not that it allowed derivatives. I have also marked [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Detroit_Book_Depository_interior.jpg Detroit_Book_Depository_interior] for deletion. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 18:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
13266 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13264 +++$+++ 13265 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.288018440E09 +++$+++ I have now got permission from the author by email to use the two photos and have uploaded them again.  +++$+++ ::I have now got permission from the author by email to use the two photos and have uploaded them again. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 07:54, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

96461 +++$+++ Rmhermen +++$+++ Funandtrvl +++$+++ 96461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-25 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.308989520E09 +++$+++ Why did you take the \"s\" off of meters in the infobox? If it is to do with making the template work I don't want to touch it but grammatically it doesn't seem to make sense.  +++$+++ Why did you take the "s" off of meters in the infobox? If it is to do with making the template work I don't want to touch it but grammatically it doesn't seem to make sense. [[User:Rmhermen|Rmhermen]] ([[User talk:Rmhermen|talk]]) 01:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
96462 +++$+++ Funandtrvl +++$+++ Funandtrvl +++$+++ 96461 +++$+++ 96461 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308990120E09 +++$+++ I just added the actual name of the linked article, see: [[Cubic metre per second]]. -- +++$+++ : I just added the actual name of the linked article, see: [[Cubic metre per second]]. --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl#top|talk]]) 01:22, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
96463 +++$+++ Funandtrvl +++$+++ Funandtrvl +++$+++ 96461 +++$+++ 96462 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.308990360E09 +++$+++ See also: [[cubic foot per second]]. It seems like the singular word is used. I know it seems like it should be plural, but maybe not?? -- +++$+++ :: See also: [[cubic foot per second]]. It seems like the singular word is used. I know it seems like it should be plural, but maybe not?? --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl#top|talk]]) 01:26, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
96464 +++$+++ Funandtrvl +++$+++ Funandtrvl +++$+++ 96461 +++$+++ 96463 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.308990540E09 +++$+++ OK, changed it to the plural form. Sorry about being confused!! -- +++$+++ :::OK, changed it to the plural form. Sorry about being confused!! --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl#top|talk]]) 01:29, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

13267 +++$+++ DeFacto +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-27 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.288245480E09 +++$+++ Please stop suggesting that I stop editing articles.  When I see a POV which I believe to be non-neutral or what I believe to [[WP:OR]] being added to an article in my 'watchlist', I will attempt to correct it.  You might be interested in reading the [[WP:NOEDIT]] section of the [[WP:WikiBullying]] essay. --  +++$+++ Please stop suggesting that I stop editing articles.  When I see a POV which I believe to be non-neutral or what I believe to [[WP:OR]] being added to an article in my 'watchlist', I will attempt to correct it.  You might be interested in reading the [[WP:NOEDIT]] section of the [[WP:WikiBullying]] essay. -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 22:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
13268 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13267 +++$+++ 13267 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.288246140E09 +++$+++ If people reading this wonder what this is about they might like to read [[User_talk:DeFacto#NPOV_again.3F|'NPOV again?']], and [[User_talk:DeFacto#persistence|'persistence']] where I have politely suggested that DeFacto takes a look at [[WP:DE]].  +++$+++ :If people reading this wonder what this is about they might like to read [[User_talk:DeFacto#NPOV_again.3F|'NPOV again?']], and [[User_talk:DeFacto#persistence|'persistence']] where I have politely suggested that DeFacto takes a look at [[WP:DE]]. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 23:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

13269 +++$+++ DeFacto +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-31 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.288586640E09 +++$+++ Peter, if you disagree with any of my edits in any article, please describe the issue in the specific article rather than in my personal talk page.  Other editors may be interested in the discussion and shouldn't need to watch my talk page to see it.  The talk pages of the article is the correct place to discuss the content of the particular article.  I'm sure you aren't trying to conflate the separate small issues to make it appear that there is just one big issue, but that is how it may appear.  You don't want to be accused of making a mountain out of a molehill - do you?  Anyway, I think you've understood most of them by now, judging by some your most recent comments and your recent updates to the graph. --  +++$+++ Peter, if you disagree with any of my edits in any article, please describe the issue in the specific article rather than in my personal talk page.  Other editors may be interested in the discussion and shouldn't need to watch my talk page to see it.  The talk pages of the article is the correct place to discuss the content of the particular article.  I'm sure you aren't trying to conflate the separate small issues to make it appear that there is just one big issue, but that is how it may appear.  You don't want to be accused of making a mountain out of a molehill - do you?  Anyway, I think you've understood most of them by now, judging by some your most recent comments and your recent updates to the graph. -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 21:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
13270 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13269 +++$+++ 13269 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.288586940E09 +++$+++ As I have explained numerous times I discus issues that relate to your views and edits across many articles and to my dispute with you on your talk page not on the article page, although I do sometimes put something there as well for the benefit of other contributors.  +++$+++ :As I have explained numerous times I discus issues that relate to your views and edits across many articles and to my dispute with you on your talk page not on the article page, although I do sometimes put something there as well for the benefit of other contributors. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 21:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

275414 +++$+++ Ron Ritzman +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275414 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-25 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.277455140E09 +++$+++ If you're going to be closing a lot of AFDs, you might find [[User:Mr.Z-man\/closeAFD|this script]] useful. -- +++$+++ If you're going to be closing a lot of AFDs, you might find [[User:Mr.Z-man/closeAFD|this script]] useful. --[[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 01:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
275415 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275414 +++$+++ 275414 +++$+++ 2010-06-25 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.277456340E09 +++$+++ Hi Ron. Thank you very much for letting me know and my apologies for the extra work I created for you. I don't close many; I just happened across those and thought I may as well close them. The reason I put the closing tag below the heading (and possibly why it's a common error with admins) is because when we close discussions in other forums, such as ANI, AN, VP etc, we put the top close tag under the heading. So if you don't close many AFDs, it seems natural, and is really just a habit, to place the close tag under the heading. Thanks for letting me know, I appreciate it. Thanks also for suggesting the script. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi Ron. Thank you very much for letting me know and my apologies for the extra work I created for you. I don't close many; I just happened across those and thought I may as well close them. The reason I put the closing tag below the heading (and possibly why it's a common error with admins) is because when we close discussions in other forums, such as ANI, AN, VP etc, we put the top close tag under the heading. So if you don't close many AFDs, it seems natural, and is really just a habit, to place the close tag under the heading. Thanks for letting me know, I appreciate it. Thanks also for suggesting the script. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:59, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
275416 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275414 +++$+++ 275414 +++$+++ 2010-06-27 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.277632680E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, I don't have a problem with the deletion being reviewed and I have no investment whatsoever in it being deleted so I don't care either way if it remains deleted or gets restored. However, DRV is not usually the first avenue in appealing a closure, but rather, a last resort after failing to achieve satisfaction in a discussion with the closing admministrator. As the Deletion Review section of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Deletion_review|deletion policy]] says: \"If you believe a page was wrongly deleted, or should have been deleted but wasn't, or a deletion discussion improperly closed, '''you should discuss this with the person who performed the deletion, or closed the debate, on their talk page. If this fails to resolve the issue, you can request review of the closure at Wikipedia:Deletion review'''.\" That said, re-reading the article and the AFD, I still think the closure was correct so I wouldn't have reversed the decision if you had bothered to discuss it with me prior to requesting a deletion review. And as I am very busy off-site and not really available at present, I am quite happy for it to go through DRV and leave the outcome up to the community. By the way, have you read the [[WP:COI|Conflict of Interest]] and [[WP:AUTO|Autobiography]] guidelines? It's really not great to have someone with such a blatant conflict of interest regarding an article so heavily involved with editing it and arguing over its existence because it compromises our cornerstone mission of being a neutral resource.  +++$+++ :Fair enough, I don't have a problem with the deletion being reviewed and I have no investment whatsoever in it being deleted so I don't care either way if it remains deleted or gets restored. However, DRV is not usually the first avenue in appealing a closure, but rather, a last resort after failing to achieve satisfaction in a discussion with the closing admministrator. As the Deletion Review section of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Deletion_review|deletion policy]] says: "If you believe a page was wrongly deleted, or should have been deleted but wasn't, or a deletion discussion improperly closed, '''you should discuss this with the person who performed the deletion, or closed the debate, on their talk page. If this fails to resolve the issue, you can request review of the closure at Wikipedia:Deletion review'''." That said, re-reading the article and the AFD, I still think the closure was correct so I wouldn't have reversed the decision if you had bothered to discuss it with me prior to requesting a deletion review. And as I am very busy off-site and not really available at present, I am quite happy for it to go through DRV and leave the outcome up to the community. By the way, have you read the [[WP:COI|Conflict of Interest]] and [[WP:AUTO|Autobiography]] guidelines? It's really not great to have someone with such a blatant conflict of interest regarding an article so heavily involved with editing it and arguing over its existence because it compromises our cornerstone mission of being a neutral resource. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
275417 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275414 +++$+++ 275414 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.277711880E09 +++$+++ No, COI wasn't the reason for my closure. Admins closing AFDs only judge the consensus of the users participating in the discussion. My reading of the discussion was (and still is now) that the consensus of the editors participating was that the band was not notable. You, as the author of the article and a member of the band, were the only person arguing for it to be kept. The other editors all made comments supporting deletion. So as far as the closing goes, it's pretty straightforward and clear that the consensus was to delete. My comments to you about COI have nothing at all to do with the closure. I'm not sure what your point is regarding COI and history, but on Wikipedia we only report what has already been published by reliable, verifiable, sources, so if your purpose here is to establish a record of history, this is really the wrong place to start and an article should only exist here once there is significant coverage in verifiable third party sources. Also, the COI of people recording material elsewhere is really not relevant for our purposes. If someone with a special interest in Australian music writes a book about Australian bands, their personal interest or involvement in the Australian music industry will not prohibit us from using their book as a source. The COI rules only apply to people writing articles on Wikipedia about subjects with which they have such a close association - such as people writing autobiographies, writing about their work, their family members, friends etc. It is our experience that most people have great difficulty approaching such subjects from a neutral point of view. If you wish to record the history of the band, you should do that elsewhere on your own personal site or another website that allows that type of thing. It's really not what Wikipedia is for and an article just can't exist here without the availability of significant coverage in reliable, verifiable, secondary sources.  +++$+++ :No, COI wasn't the reason for my closure. Admins closing AFDs only judge the consensus of the users participating in the discussion. My reading of the discussion was (and still is now) that the consensus of the editors participating was that the band was not notable. You, as the author of the article and a member of the band, were the only person arguing for it to be kept. The other editors all made comments supporting deletion. So as far as the closing goes, it's pretty straightforward and clear that the consensus was to delete. My comments to you about COI have nothing at all to do with the closure. I'm not sure what your point is regarding COI and history, but on Wikipedia we only report what has already been published by reliable, verifiable, sources, so if your purpose here is to establish a record of history, this is really the wrong place to start and an article should only exist here once there is significant coverage in verifiable third party sources. Also, the COI of people recording material elsewhere is really not relevant for our purposes. If someone with a special interest in Australian music writes a book about Australian bands, their personal interest or involvement in the Australian music industry will not prohibit us from using their book as a source. The COI rules only apply to people writing articles on Wikipedia about subjects with which they have such a close association - such as people writing autobiographies, writing about their work, their family members, friends etc. It is our experience that most people have great difficulty approaching such subjects from a neutral point of view. If you wish to record the history of the band, you should do that elsewhere on your own personal site or another website that allows that type of thing. It's really not what Wikipedia is for and an article just can't exist here without the availability of significant coverage in reliable, verifiable, secondary sources. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

13272 +++$+++ DeFacto +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-05 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.288994460E09 +++$+++ Thanks. --  +++$+++ Thanks. -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 15:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
13273 +++$+++ DeFacto +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13272 +++$+++ 13272 +++$+++ 2010-11-09 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.289326800E09 +++$+++ How are we doing with these - are you going to answer my points on them all? --  +++$+++ :How are we doing with these - are you going to answer my points on them all? -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 10:20, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
13274 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13272 +++$+++ 13273 +++$+++ 2010-11-09 10:25:00 +++$+++ 1.289327100E09 +++$+++ I believe my description of the issues is clear. You have said you don't understand some of them, but I don't think that spending more time discussing them will make it any clearer. I have already responded to some on the enforcement particle by making changes to the article. I will however do an update on you talk page soon as you request.  +++$+++ ::I believe my description of the issues is clear. You have said you don't understand some of them, but I don't think that spending more time discussing them will make it any clearer. I have already responded to some on the enforcement particle by making changes to the article. I will however do an update on you talk page soon as you request. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 10:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

275418 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-27 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.277650500E09 +++$+++ Can you block (the amount of time it up to you of course) {{Userlinks|Brandondorf9999}}? The editor clearly doesn't care about [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File:Deluxe_Digital_Studios.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=370316596 copyright] and is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABidgee&action=historysubmit&diff=370317502&oldid=370269917 clearly a troll].  +++$+++ Can you block (the amount of time it up to you of course) {{Userlinks|Brandondorf9999}}? The editor clearly doesn't care about [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Deluxe_Digital_Studios.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=370316596 copyright] and is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABidgee&action=historysubmit&diff=370317502&oldid=370269917 clearly a troll]. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 07:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
275419 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275418 +++$+++ 275418 +++$+++ 2010-06-27 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.277655600E09 +++$+++ Hmm, I've blocked him. I told him I'd be willing to give him another chance if he stops upload copyvios and will see what he says but it's not very encouraging given he's already been blocked twice before but has only an edit count of under 100.  +++$+++ :Hmm, I've blocked him. I told him I'd be willing to give him another chance if he stops upload copyvios and will see what he says but it's not very encouraging given he's already been blocked twice before but has only an edit count of under 100. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:20, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
275420 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275418 +++$+++ 275419 +++$+++ 2010-06-27 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.277659380E09 +++$+++ I'm also wanting him to understand copyrights and that he has to stop trolling editors, but he's behaviour hasn't changed.  +++$+++ ::I'm also wanting him to understand copyrights and that he has to stop trolling editors, but he's behaviour hasn't changed. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 10:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
275421 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275418 +++$+++ 275420 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.277710320E09 +++$+++ I know. We should probably be on the look-out for socks as I see from the user log that he seems to have previously used [[User:Brandondorf99999]]. Also  +++$+++ :::I know. We should probably be on the look-out for socks as I see from the user log that he seems to have previously used [[User:Brandondorf99999]]. Also [[User:Brandondorf999999]] was registered but never used. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
275422 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275418 +++$+++ 275421 +++$+++ 2010-06-29 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.277821980E09 +++$+++ How creative! Makes it easy for us if he turns though! Thank you for dealing with them.  +++$+++ ::::How creative! Makes it easy for us if he turns though! Thank you for dealing with them. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 07:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

13275 +++$+++ Arriva436 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-30 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.293741240E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I've been meaning to ask this for a while but I've only just got around to it. I believe that you're are around the East of England somewhere, and knowing of your photo of the Kesgrave busway, I've been wondering whether you could help. A couple of months ago, someone asked at [[:Talk:Ipswich Buses]] whether anyone had an up to date image, as currently the only image in the article is a couple of years old and shows a bus which has long since left the fleet. I was wondering whether you had\/could get any photos of Ispwich Buses vehicles for use in the article. If not, not to worry, but I thought it would be worth asking. <font style=\"font-family: Zapfino, Segoe Script\"><font color=\"#FF0000\"> +++$+++ Hi there. I've been meaning to ask this for a while but I've only just got around to it. I believe that you're are around the East of England somewhere, and knowing of your photo of the Kesgrave busway, I've been wondering whether you could help. A couple of months ago, someone asked at [[:Talk:Ipswich Buses]] whether anyone had an up to date image, as currently the only image in the article is a couple of years old and shows a bus which has long since left the fleet. I was wondering whether you had/could get any photos of Ispwich Buses vehicles for use in the article. If not, not to worry, but I thought it would be worth asking. <font style="font-family: Zapfino, Segoe Script"><font color="#FF0000">[[User:Arriva436|'''Arriva436''']]</font><font color="#800080"><sup>[[User talk:Arriva436|'''talk''']]/[[Special:Contributions/Arriva436|'''contribs''']]</sup></font></font> 12:34, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
13276 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13275 +++$+++ 13275 +++$+++ 2011-01-01 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.293903600E09 +++$+++ No problem... done.  +++$+++ :No problem... done. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 09:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
13277 +++$+++ Arriva436 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13275 +++$+++ 13276 +++$+++ 2011-01-01 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.293929160E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much!! <font style=\"font-family: Zapfino, Segoe Script\"><font color=\"#FF0000\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks very much!! <font style="font-family: Zapfino, Segoe Script"><font color="#FF0000">[[User:Arriva436|'''Arriva436''']]</font><font color="#800080"><sup>[[User talk:Arriva436|'''talk''']]/[[Special:Contributions/Arriva436|'''contribs''']]</sup></font></font> 16:46, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

537565 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537565 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-02 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.165125540E09 +++$+++ Do you personally dislike my country?! Bulgaria was a great Middle Age power. I can't see in what way france, england or the Frankish Empire exceed Bulgaria in this period. -- +++$+++ Do you personally dislike my country?! Bulgaria was a great Middle Age power. I can't see in what way france, england or the Frankish Empire exceed Bulgaria in this period. --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 21:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
537566 +++$+++ Euthymios +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537565 +++$+++ 537565 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.165125660E09 +++$+++ I have a question, why did Tsar Simeon call himself \"Tsar of Bulgarians and Greeks\" if the Byzantine Empire was not Greek?-- +++$+++ :I have a question, why did Tsar Simeon call himself "Tsar of Bulgarians and Greeks" if the Byzantine Empire was not Greek?--[[User:Euthymios|Euthymios]] 22:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

13278 +++$+++ Ephebi +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-08 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.294559760E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for uploading the graphic '[[[File:Killed on British Roads.png]]]'. I presume this is your own work derived from the official document? However, rather than having a vertical axis in absolute terms, are there statistics given that could be used to plot deaths or KSI per vehicle km? If you use absolute terms it risks serious misrepresentation as obviously the amount of people on the road has changed tremendously over time. But with that change it becomes far more encyclopaedic.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi, thanks for uploading the graphic '[[[File:Killed on British Roads.png]]]'. I presume this is your own work derived from the official document? However, rather than having a vertical axis in absolute terms, are there statistics given that could be used to plot deaths or KSI per vehicle km? If you use absolute terms it risks serious misrepresentation as obviously the amount of people on the road has changed tremendously over time. But with that change it becomes far more encyclopaedic.  Thanks, [[User:Ephebi|Ephebi]] ([[User talk:Ephebi|talk]]) 23:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
13279 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13278 +++$+++ 13278 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 10:06:00 +++$+++ 1.294596360E09 +++$+++ Yes it is my work, and there are further details of the data sources etc an extensive discussion about balance available on the talk page. There are certainly other ways to present the data however I am not intending to change this image at this time given the huge amount of consultation that went into getting it to where it is now (see talk page for the discussion). The other reason is that any single graph can only tell part of the story. Feel free to create some other graphs telling other stories!  +++$+++ :Yes it is my work, and there are further details of the data sources etc an extensive discussion about balance available on the talk page. There are certainly other ways to present the data however I am not intending to change this image at this time given the huge amount of consultation that went into getting it to where it is now (see talk page for the discussion). The other reason is that any single graph can only tell part of the story. Feel free to create some other graphs telling other stories! [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 10:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
13280 +++$+++ Ephebi +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13278 +++$+++ 13279 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.294643040E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but which talk page? I came across the graphic at [Roads in the United Kingdom] - is there another?  +++$+++ :: Sorry, but which talk page? I came across the graphic at [Roads in the United Kingdom] - is there another? [[User:Ephebi|Ephebi]] ([[User talk:Ephebi|talk]]) 23:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
13281 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13278 +++$+++ 13280 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.294655700E09 +++$+++ Yes, the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:Killed_on_British_Roads.png talk page of the file itself].  +++$+++ :::Yes, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Killed_on_British_Roads.png talk page of the file itself]. [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 02:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
13282 +++$+++ Rédacteur Tibet +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13278 +++$+++ 13278 +++$+++ 2011-02-03 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.296803040E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your response, information and enthusiasm. May I ask you to confirm me that '''also''' as the meaning of '''as well as''' in above sentence, and that therefore the meaning of the above sentence is '''Advocacy groups, lobby groups and some interest groups and special interest groups use advocacy''' ? (I understand it is the case, but I would like to make sure).-- +++$+++ :Many thanks for your response, information and enthusiasm. May I ask you to confirm me that '''also''' as the meaning of '''as well as''' in above sentence, and that therefore the meaning of the above sentence is '''Advocacy groups, lobby groups and some interest groups and special interest groups use advocacy''' ? (I understand it is the case, but I would like to make sure).--[[User:Rédacteur Tibet|Rédacteur Tibet]] ([[User talk:Rédacteur Tibet|talk]]) 23:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

275423 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275423 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-28 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.277729040E09 +++$+++ [[File:Choco chip cookie.png|100px|left]] Thought you might need a cookie, because ... ummm... I dunno, because having a cookie is a good thing? =) --  +++$+++ [[File:Choco chip cookie.png|100px|left]] Thought you might need a cookie, because ... ummm... I dunno, because having a cookie is a good thing? =) -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo|talk]]) 05:44, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
275424 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275423 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-29 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.277814720E09 +++$+++ Heh, thanks guys. Gogo, haven't seen you around for a while. I hope all is well with you. 19Nightmares, I had to remove one of your cookies as it was screwing up the format of my page and I couldn't work out how else to fix it. Thanks for the kind thought, though, much appreciated.:)   +++$+++ ::Heh, thanks guys. Gogo, haven't seen you around for a while. I hope all is well with you. 19Nightmares, I had to remove one of your cookies as it was screwing up the format of my page and I couldn't work out how else to fix it. Thanks for the kind thought, though, much appreciated.:)  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 05:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

275425 +++$+++ SheffieldSteel +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275425 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-29 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.277871960E09 +++$+++ Looking at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Chuck_Marean#Appeal_by_Chuck_Marean this], it looks like you ought to be notified of this appeal.  Regards,  <font color=\"005522\"> +++$+++ Looking at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chuck_Marean#Appeal_by_Chuck_Marean this], it looks like you ought to be notified of this appeal.  Regards,  <font color="005522">[[User:SheffieldSteel|S<small>HEFFIELD</small>S<small>TEEL</small>]]</font><sup><small><b>[[User_talk:SheffieldSteel|TALK]]</b></small></sup> 21:26, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
275426 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275425 +++$+++ 275425 +++$+++ 2010-06-30 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.277883060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. I'm not sure why he's labeling me the admin who found consensus or implemented the ban. I don't think I had anything at all to do with his ban and my only involvement came when he emailed the unblock list wanting to appeal and I reblocked him with the ability to edit his talk page restored. I don't think I've had any other involvement in that case.  +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know. I'm not sure why he's labeling me the admin who found consensus or implemented the ban. I don't think I had anything at all to do with his ban and my only involvement came when he emailed the unblock list wanting to appeal and I reblocked him with the ability to edit his talk page restored. I don't think I've had any other involvement in that case. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 00:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

275427 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-29 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.277825520E09 +++$+++ Can you protect or put edit review protection on [[2CC]]? I asked for it on [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for protection|RfPP]] but was declined by [[User:HJ Mitchell]] on the grounds that ''not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&diff=370747521&oldid=370747368]'', I do not see how blocking the IP will help as they will just sign up for an account and continue the disruption.  +++$+++ Can you protect or put edit review protection on [[2CC]]? I asked for it on [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for protection|RfPP]] but was declined by [[User:HJ Mitchell]] on the grounds that ''not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&diff=370747521&oldid=370747368]'', I do not see how blocking the IP will help as they will just sign up for an account and continue the disruption. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 08:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
275428 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275427 +++$+++ 275427 +++$+++ 2010-06-30 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.277895000E09 +++$+++ I've semi-ed that article and I've blocked the main problematic user {{User|165.228.126.76}}. I turned off account creation so they can't sign up for a new account from that IP. Normally I would agree with HJ Mitchell, as it was a pretty slow-burning edit war but that's a pretty minor and low-traffic article and they've been coming back regularly for months purely to edit war over that section. It's really not fair on the few active editors who are watching the article. Plus that IP has already been blocked once for their edits to that article and it didn't seem to make an impression on them as they resumed edit warring as soon as it expired so I don't think merely blocking the IP would be sufficient - it would just delay things until their block expires and they start up again. I will try to keep an eye on the article but feel free to let me know if any accounts come out of the woodwork to continue edit warring. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I've semi-ed that article and I've blocked the main problematic user {{User|165.228.126.76}}. I turned off account creation so they can't sign up for a new account from that IP. Normally I would agree with HJ Mitchell, as it was a pretty slow-burning edit war but that's a pretty minor and low-traffic article and they've been coming back regularly for months purely to edit war over that section. It's really not fair on the few active editors who are watching the article. Plus that IP has already been blocked once for their edits to that article and it didn't seem to make an impression on them as they resumed edit warring as soon as it expired so I don't think merely blocking the IP would be sufficient - it would just delay things until their block expires and they start up again. I will try to keep an eye on the article but feel free to let me know if any accounts come out of the woodwork to continue edit warring. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
275429 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275427 +++$+++ 275428 +++$+++ 2010-06-30 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.277896740E09 +++$+++ On other matters two editors refuse to recognise the errors [[:File:Hidden Valley Raceway (Australia) track map.svg]] which makes the map unreliable ([[:File:Hidden Valley Race Way Track.png]] is closer to the real life track [http:\/\/www.nmd.com.au\/resources\/images\/trackimages\/Hidden_Valley_Official_sm.jpg][http:\/\/maps.google.com.au\/maps?q=Hidden+Valley,+NT&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Hidden+Valley+Northern+Territory&gl=au&ei=tsUqTO3RCIGgkQWAuZmQBA&ved=0CBYQ8gEwAA&ll=-12.447892,130.90682&spn=0.010225,0.01929&t=h&z=16]) and keep placing it on the [[Hidden Valley Raceway]] ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Hidden_Valley_Raceway&action=history History]) article. I've tried the [[Talk:Hidden Valley Raceway|talk page]] but failed there as well. I've dealt with this editor in the past but they are very pushy, opinionated (which is ok on talk pages but not articles) and will not compromise.  +++$+++ ::On other matters two editors refuse to recognise the errors [[:File:Hidden Valley Raceway (Australia) track map.svg]] which makes the map unreliable ([[:File:Hidden Valley Race Way Track.png]] is closer to the real life track [http://www.nmd.com.au/resources/images/trackimages/Hidden_Valley_Official_sm.jpg][http://maps.google.com.au/maps?q=Hidden+Valley,+NT&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Hidden+Valley+Northern+Territory&gl=au&ei=tsUqTO3RCIGgkQWAuZmQBA&ved=0CBYQ8gEwAA&ll=-12.447892,130.90682&spn=0.010225,0.01929&t=h&z=16]) and keep placing it on the [[Hidden Valley Raceway]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hidden_Valley_Raceway&action=history History]) article. I've tried the [[Talk:Hidden Valley Raceway|talk page]] but failed there as well. I've dealt with this editor in the past but they are very pushy, opinionated (which is ok on talk pages but not articles) and will not compromise. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 04:19, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
275430 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275427 +++$+++ 275429 +++$+++ 2010-07-01 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.277977200E09 +++$+++ I'm not really sure what to do about that one. I don't know anything about racing or race tracks. I went to the [[Indy 500]] in [[Indianapolis]] when I was about 17 but I haven't set foot on a racetrack since then! So I don't feel very comfortable getting into a debate about the accuracy of a raceway map. If there's errors with the map, the guy who created it should be told so he can fix them. He should also remove his watermarks and credits if he wants them to be used here (I really hate watermarks on Wikimedia images). You could also post about it on [[WP:AWNB]] and maybe the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps|Maps WikiProject]] or the [[Wikipedia:Graphic Lab\/Map workshop|Map workshop]] to get more eyes on it.   +++$+++ :::I'm not really sure what to do about that one. I don't know anything about racing or race tracks. I went to the [[Indy 500]] in [[Indianapolis]] when I was about 17 but I haven't set foot on a racetrack since then! So I don't feel very comfortable getting into a debate about the accuracy of a raceway map. If there's errors with the map, the guy who created it should be told so he can fix them. He should also remove his watermarks and credits if he wants them to be used here (I really hate watermarks on Wikimedia images). You could also post about it on [[WP:AWNB]] and maybe the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps|Maps WikiProject]] or the [[Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Map workshop|Map workshop]] to get more eyes on it.  [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

133286 +++$+++ Mitsube +++$+++ Sylvain1972 +++$+++ 133286 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-19 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.269053100E09 +++$+++ Would you mind checking [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Early_Buddhist_schools&action=historysubmit&diff=350659422&oldid=348098734 this] series of diffs? Thanks,  +++$+++ Would you mind checking [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Early_Buddhist_schools&action=historysubmit&diff=350659422&oldid=348098734 this] series of diffs? Thanks, [[User:Mitsube|Mitsube]] ([[User talk:Mitsube|talk]]) 19:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
133287 +++$+++ Sylvain1972 +++$+++ Sylvain1972 +++$+++ 133286 +++$+++ 133286 +++$+++ 2010-03-19 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.269056100E09 +++$+++ I noticed that actually and I had a look. I didn't scrutinize it really closely but I think it was more or less OK. +++$+++ :I noticed that actually and I had a look. I didn't scrutinize it really closely but I think it was more or less OK.[[User:Sylvain1972|Sylvain1972]] ([[User talk:Sylvain1972#top|talk]]) 20:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
133288 +++$+++ Mitsube +++$+++ Sylvain1972 +++$+++ 133286 +++$+++ 133287 +++$+++ 2010-03-19 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.269060060E09 +++$+++ OK great. Here's a heads-up in case you haven't heard about it (though you probably have). On the night of April 7th there is going to be a two-hour special on PBS about Buddhism, so if you could be sure to be on wikipedia before and after that, and the next day, that would be good. There may be a lot of IP vandalism and other detrimental edits. I will ask for semi-protect for the main two articles.  +++$+++ ::OK great. Here's a heads-up in case you haven't heard about it (though you probably have). On the night of April 7th there is going to be a two-hour special on PBS about Buddhism, so if you could be sure to be on wikipedia before and after that, and the next day, that would be good. There may be a lot of IP vandalism and other detrimental edits. I will ask for semi-protect for the main two articles. [[User:Mitsube|Mitsube]] ([[User talk:Mitsube|talk]]) 21:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
133289 +++$+++ Sylvain1972 +++$+++ Sylvain1972 +++$+++ 133286 +++$+++ 133286 +++$+++ 2010-03-20 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.269072600E09 +++$+++ Interesting, I hadn't heard about it. +++$+++ :Interesting, I hadn't heard about it.[[User:Sylvain1972|Sylvain1972]] ([[User talk:Sylvain1972#top|talk]]) 01:10, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
133290 +++$+++ Mitsube +++$+++ Sylvain1972 +++$+++ 133286 +++$+++ 133289 +++$+++ 2010-03-20 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.269072780E09 +++$+++ See [http:\/\/www.pbs.org\/thebuddha\/] and [http:\/\/www.shambhalasun.com\/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=3513].  +++$+++ ::See [http://www.pbs.org/thebuddha/] and [http://www.shambhalasun.com/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=3513]. [[User:Mitsube|Mitsube]] ([[User talk:Mitsube|talk]]) 01:13, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
133291 +++$+++ Sylvain1972 +++$+++ Sylvain1972 +++$+++ 133286 +++$+++ 133290 +++$+++ 2010-03-20 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.269073380E09 +++$+++ Thanks! +++$+++ :::Thanks![[User:Sylvain1972|Sylvain1972]] ([[User talk:Sylvain1972#top|talk]]) 01:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

275431 +++$+++ Minor4th +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-30 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.277892960E09 +++$+++ Hey Sarah -- just wanted to say sorry for all the drama and such related to that group of articles and related discussions.  Looking back, it seems we all kind of turned into zombies and acted like idiots.  Sorry for my part.   No hard feelings here.   Take care.  <span style=\"white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #999999;padding:0px;background:#FFFFff\"> +++$+++ Hey Sarah -- just wanted to say sorry for all the drama and such related to that group of articles and related discussions.  Looking back, it seems we all kind of turned into zombies and acted like idiots.  Sorry for my part.   No hard feelings here.   Take care.  <span style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #999999;padding:0px;background:#FFFFff">[[User:Minor4th|<b span style="color:#000000;font-size:110%;"><font face="papyrus">Minor</b><b span style="color:#ff0000;font-size:80%;">4th</font face></b>]] [[User talk:Minor4th|<b span style="color:#000000;font-size:60%;">• talk</b>]]</span> 03:16, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
275432 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275431 +++$+++ 275431 +++$+++ 2010-07-01 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.277977380E09 +++$+++ No problems. I appreciate that and I hope we can all move on and leave it in the past. Thanks.  +++$+++ :No problems. I appreciate that and I hope we can all move on and leave it in the past. Thanks. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

13289 +++$+++ Peter Horn +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310687220E09 +++$+++ \"...which are not funding by the government...\". Should that nor read \"...which are not '''''funded''''' by the government...\"?  +++$+++ "...which are not funding by the government...". Should that nor read "...which are not '''''funded''''' by the government..."? [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] [[User talk:Peter Horn|User talk]] 16:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
13290 +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13289 +++$+++ 13289 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.310690880E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately I have no idea which article you are referring to. Anyway.. do please correct my grammar when you see errors as this is something I know that I am weak on!  +++$+++ :Unfortunately I have no idea which article you are referring to. Anyway.. do please correct my grammar when you see errors as this is something I know that I am weak on! [[User:PeterEastern|PeterEastern]] ([[User talk:PeterEastern#top|talk]]) 17:48, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
13291 +++$+++ Peter Horn +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13289 +++$+++ 13290 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.310714700E09 +++$+++ I was refering to [[User:PeterEastern|your own user page]]!  +++$+++ ::I was refering to [[User:PeterEastern|your own user page]]! [[User:Peter Horn|Peter Horn]] [[User talk:Peter Horn|User talk]] 00:25, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
13292 +++$+++  +++$+++ PeterEastern +++$+++ 13289 +++$+++ 13291 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Oh yes! Thanks. Wikipedia search didn't find that for me, I guess it doesn't search user pages!  Happy editing. 21:34, 15 July 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ :::Oh yes! Thanks. Wikipedia search didn't find that for me, I guess it doesn't search user pages!  Happy editing. 21:34, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

275435 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275435 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-03 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.278195480E09 +++$+++ Want your advice and approval. I'm thinking of changing my user name on Wikipedia.  \"Dmartinaus\" is awfully personal (after all \"D Martin,\" and Aus for Austin) is pretty clear. At the time I signed up for Wikipedia I was unaware of many issues about choosing a user name.  This possible change is not to hide my identity as I disclose it fully on my User page which I think is a fair thing to do. See [[User:Dmartinaus]]   But I'd prefer that someone have to go look that up if they are really interested, rather than being so \"out there\" publicly with my current username on every edit.  If acceptable to change names, the name would likely be \"Austx\" through an usurption of a name that has never had edits or been used.   Is this acceptable to you?  <small style=\"white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Want your advice and approval. I'm thinking of changing my user name on Wikipedia.  "Dmartinaus" is awfully personal (after all "D Martin," and Aus for Austin) is pretty clear. At the time I signed up for Wikipedia I was unaware of many issues about choosing a user name.  This possible change is not to hide my identity as I disclose it fully on my User page which I think is a fair thing to do. See [[User:Dmartinaus]]   But I'd prefer that someone have to go look that up if they are really interested, rather than being so "out there" publicly with my current username on every edit.  If acceptable to change names, the name would likely be "Austx" through an usurption of a name that has never had edits or been used.   Is this acceptable to you?  <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;">[[User:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:#008080;">Dmartinaus</span>]] • [[User talk:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:Black;White;">Talk</span>]] </small> 15:18, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
275436 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275435 +++$+++ 275435 +++$+++ 2010-07-04 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.278232560E09 +++$+++ I don't have any problems at all with you changing your name to something else so please feel free to go ahead. However, I see in the user log [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=Austx&group=&limit=100] that someone else has already registered Austx and it has been used to make edits to articles, so you'll probably have to choose something else.  +++$+++ :I don't have any problems at all with you changing your name to something else so please feel free to go ahead. However, I see in the user log [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=Austx&group=&limit=100] that someone else has already registered Austx and it has been used to make edits to articles, so you'll probably have to choose something else. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:36, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
275437 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275435 +++$+++ 275436 +++$+++ 2010-07-04 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.278233520E09 +++$+++ Thank you <small style=\"white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::Thank you <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;">[[User:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:#008080;">Dmartinaus</span>]] • [[User talk:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:Black;White;">Talk</span>]] </small> 01:52, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
275438 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275435 +++$+++ 275435 +++$+++ 2010-07-04 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.278270360E09 +++$+++ Heh I think a bottle of scotch would spread the \"WikiLove\" a lot more effectively than a cup of coffee! :p Thank you for the kind thought, I hope things are going well in your corner of the wiki.  +++$+++ :Heh I think a bottle of scotch would spread the "WikiLove" a lot more effectively than a cup of coffee! :p Thank you for the kind thought, I hope things are going well in your corner of the wiki. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 12:06, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

537580 +++$+++ GiorgioOrsini +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537580 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-07 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.165482900E09 +++$+++ Also, many thanks you for your editorial improvements of the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Andrea_Meldolla Andrea Meldolla] article!-- +++$+++ Also, many thanks you for your editorial improvements of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Meldolla Andrea Meldolla] article!--[[User:GiorgioOrsini|GiorgioOrsini]] 01:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
537581 +++$+++ GiorgioOrsini +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537580 +++$+++ 537580 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.166095020E09 +++$+++ I left a response to your note on the [[Andrea Meldolla]] talk pages.-- +++$+++ :I left a response to your note on the [[Andrea Meldolla]] talk pages.--[[User:GiorgioOrsini|GiorgioOrsini]] 03:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

570194 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570194 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-11 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.207932060E09 +++$+++ Congratulations, I'm pleased to let you know that I've closed your RfA as successful, and you're now an [[WP:ADMIN|administrator]]!  May I suggest you visit the [[Wikipedia:New admin school]] to get a few ideas on the best way to start using your shiny new buttons?  If in doubt, feel free to give me a shout!  Well done and all the best,  +++$+++ Congratulations, I'm pleased to let you know that I've closed your RfA as successful, and you're now an [[WP:ADMIN|administrator]]!  May I suggest you visit the [[Wikipedia:New admin school]] to get a few ideas on the best way to start using your shiny new buttons?  If in doubt, feel free to give me a shout!  Well done and all the best, [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 09:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
570195 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570194 +++$+++ 570194 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 10:03:00 +++$+++ 1.207933380E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 10:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
570196 +++$+++ Dihydrogen Monoxide +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570194 +++$+++ 570195 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.207936800E09 +++$+++ Congrats! Glad TRM closed the RfA correctly ;) Just work on that brevity! Cheers, '' +++$+++ ::Congrats! Glad TRM closed the RfA correctly ;) Just work on that brevity! Cheers, ''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|dihydrogen monoxide]]'' <small>([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|H<sub>2</sub>O]])</small> 11:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
570197 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570194 +++$+++ 570196 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.207943160E09 +++$+++ Well done! Few additonal links for you if required: [[Wikipedia:Advice for new administrators]], [[Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list]] and [[Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide]].  +++$+++ :::Well done! Few additonal links for you if required: [[Wikipedia:Advice for new administrators]], [[Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list]] and [[Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide]]. [[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 12:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
570198 +++$+++ Keeper76 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570194 +++$+++ 570197 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.207950960E09 +++$+++ Quick congrats from me too, admininistratorious templatius!  I have a sneaky suspicion that although you will specialize in templates for now, that, if\/when you ever decide to do anything else with your shiny new buttons, you'll do it with expertise and precision.  A couple of other Outside Views (I read your thread above), you are not required to have email as an admin (I don't - never have, never will for similar reasons as you stated), and I would strongly recommend you not putting your phone number on your userpage.  Having a link to your website is probably \"close enough\".  Typically, admins' userpages\/usertalk get quite a bit more [[WP:VAND|\"traffic\"]] than other editors', risk\/reward says not worth it, which is just my opinion of course.  Congrats again!  [[WP:DDMP|Don't break anything;)]].  :-)  [[User:Keeper76|<font color=\"#21421E\" face=\"comic sans ms\">Keeper<\/font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color=\"#CC7722\" face=\"Papyrus\">76<\/font>]]  |   +++$+++ ::::Quick congrats from me too, admininistratorious templatius!  I have a sneaky suspicion that although you will specialize in templates for now, that, if/when you ever decide to do anything else with your shiny new buttons, you'll do it with expertise and precision.  A couple of other Outside Views (I read your thread above), you are not required to have email as an admin (I don't - never have, never will for similar reasons as you stated), and I would strongly recommend you not putting your phone number on your userpage.  Having a link to your website is probably "close enough".  Typically, admins' userpages/usertalk get quite a bit more [[WP:VAND|"traffic"]] than other editors', risk/reward says not worth it, which is just my opinion of course.  Congrats again!  [[WP:DDMP|Don't break anything;)]].  :-)  [[User:Keeper76|<font color="#21421E" face="comic sans ms">Keeper</font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">76</font>]]  |  [[User:Keeper76#Origins of My Username|<font color="#ff0000"><small>Disclaimer</small></font>]] 14:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
570199 +++$+++ Happy-melon +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570194 +++$+++ 570198 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.207952580E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! <font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ :::::Congratulations! <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 15:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
570200 +++$+++  +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570194 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.207972320E09 +++$+++ Well done! You'll do us proud.  +++$+++ :::::::Well done! You'll do us proud. [[User_talk:Rudget|<span style="color:#8B0000;font-weight:bold">Rudget</span>]] ([[Wikipedia:Editor review/Rudget|<span style="color:#000000;">review</span>]]) 20:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
570201 +++$+++ Noetica  +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570194 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.207978980E09 +++$+++ Congratulations from me too, David. All the very best to you.\u2013<font color=\"blue\"><sub><big><big>'''[[User_talk:Noetica |\u22a5]]'''<\/big><\/big><\/sub><sup>\xa1\u0250\u0254\u0131\u0287\u01ddo<\/sup>N<small>oetica!<\/small><\/font><sup> +++$+++ ::::::::Congratulations from me too, David. All the very best to you.–<font color="blue"><sub><big><big>'''[[User_talk:Noetica |⊥]]'''</big></big></sub><sup>¡ɐɔıʇǝo</sup>N<small>oetica!</small></font><sup>[[User_talk:Noetica |T]]</sup>– 22:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
570202 +++$+++ CapitalR +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570194 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.208021520E09 +++$+++ Congratulations David!  I'll be sure to send some editprotected requests your way soon.  -- +++$+++ :::::::::Congratulations David!  I'll be sure to send some editprotected requests your way soon.  --[[User:CapitalR|CapitalR]] ([[User talk:CapitalR|talk]]) 10:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

537582 +++$+++ NovaNova +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-07 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.165563780E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:NovaNova|NovaNova]] 23:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
537583 +++$+++ Spylab +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537582 +++$+++ 537582 +++$+++ 2006-12-11 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.165870380E09 +++$+++ [[User:NovaNova]] has constantly reverted a section of the [[neo-Nazism]] article to an inferior state that did not focus on the actual topic of the article. I comprimised by combining the old and new version of the section, but NovaNova continued the destructive reverts instead of making productive edits. This led to the article being locked. NovaNova has done similar things to the [[Neo-Nazism in Croatia]] article, but to a lesser extent (so far). The two anonymous IPs who reverted the neo-Nazism article were obviously NovaNova. They did the exact same revert that NovaNova kept doing, and used the same kind of unique language style in the edit note that NovaNova is known for. I find it amusing that NovaNova would write here that I broke 3RR, since NovaNova has been guilty of the same offence. +++$+++ *[[User:NovaNova]] has constantly reverted a section of the [[neo-Nazism]] article to an inferior state that did not focus on the actual topic of the article. I comprimised by combining the old and new version of the section, but NovaNova continued the destructive reverts instead of making productive edits. This led to the article being locked. NovaNova has done similar things to the [[Neo-Nazism in Croatia]] article, but to a lesser extent (so far). The two anonymous IPs who reverted the neo-Nazism article were obviously NovaNova. They did the exact same revert that NovaNova kept doing, and used the same kind of unique language style in the edit note that NovaNova is known for. I find it amusing that NovaNova would write here that I broke 3RR, since NovaNova has been guilty of the same offence.[[User:Spylab|Spylab]] 12:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

275439 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-22 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.277215020E09 +++$+++ The full list is at [[:Category:FA-Class Australia articles]]. I guess recently-written history ones are good examples. {{User|Hawkeye7}} has at least a half dozen in the past year; he's a professional military historian in Canberra and uses the AWM stuff, so it seems ''' +++$+++ The full list is at [[:Category:FA-Class Australia articles]]. I guess recently-written history ones are good examples. {{User|Hawkeye7}} has at least a half dozen in the past year; he's a professional military historian in Canberra and uses the AWM stuff, so it seems '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey#Photo_poll|<font color="#FA8605">vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll]]''</font>)  06:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
275440 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275439 +++$+++ 275439 +++$+++ 2010-06-22 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.277215140E09 +++$+++ I haven't bothered to give examples that weren't museum\/GLAM\/history themed but there are others. The problem with old FAs is that the standards have gone up, generally there is little degradation except on articles about major countries, cities and the like, or POV magnets ''' +++$+++ :I haven't bothered to give examples that weren't museum/GLAM/history themed but there are others. The problem with old FAs is that the standards have gone up, generally there is little degradation except on articles about major countries, cities and the like, or POV magnets '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey#Photo_poll|<font color="#FA8605">vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll]]''</font>)  06:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
275441 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275439 +++$+++ 275440 +++$+++ 2010-06-22 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.277228160E09 +++$+++ Oh, you're wonderful, thanks heaps for that Mr Monkey. They are history curators and collection managers so [[HMS Endeavour]] would probably be best but I'll have a poke around that cat. Thank you very much for your help, I really appreciate it. I hope all is well with you. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Oh, you're wonderful, thanks heaps for that Mr Monkey. They are history curators and collection managers so [[HMS Endeavour]] would probably be best but I'll have a poke around that cat. Thank you very much for your help, I really appreciate it. I hope all is well with you. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 10:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
275442 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275439 +++$+++ 275441 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.277711340E09 +++$+++ Well, how did it go? Is it on video or anything like Youtube? ''' +++$+++ :::Well, how did it go? Is it on video or anything like Youtube? '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey#Photo_poll|<font color="#FA8605">vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll]]''</font>)  00:49, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
275443 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275439 +++$+++ 275442 +++$+++ 2010-06-30 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.277892180E09 +++$+++ Did it go well? ''' +++$+++ ::::Did it go well? '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey#Photo_poll|<font color="#FA8605">vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll]]''</font>)  03:03, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
275444 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275439 +++$+++ 275443 +++$+++ 2010-06-30 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.277892540E09 +++$+++ Yes, it went really well, thanks Mr Monkey. :) We've got some good feedback and I am very hopeful that it will lead to further opportunities for us down the track. Thank you for your help, it was much appreciated. I ended up using the HMS Endeavour.  +++$+++ :::::Yes, it went really well, thanks Mr Monkey. :) We've got some good feedback and I am very hopeful that it will lead to further opportunities for us down the track. Thank you for your help, it was much appreciated. I ended up using the HMS Endeavour. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
275445 +++$+++ YellowMonkey +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275439 +++$+++ 275444 +++$+++ 2010-07-01 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.277971080E09 +++$+++ What is the objective of these talks? Is it to get museums etc to be impressed and declare their publications PD so we can lift it? Or is it to try and get historians etc to edit wiki? ''' +++$+++ ::::::What is the objective of these talks? Is it to get museums etc to be impressed and declare their publications PD so we can lift it? Or is it to try and get historians etc to edit wiki? '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]'''  (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey#Photo_poll|<font color="#FA8605">vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll]]''</font>)  00:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
275446 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275439 +++$+++ 275445 +++$+++ 2010-07-01 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.277973840E09 +++$+++ I would love to see experienced historians (though they may need some help with writing Wiki articles and citing [which is totally different to what they have learnt and are use to]) to write articles on Australian history (Not just about Australia itself but events, locations ect). I'm not trying to say we are no good at it but it would be great to have some more helpers add to the missing areas where we can't or areas we don't even know about (IE: places we never heard of or an event which has been forgotten). Also I'm currently trying to acquire (at my own cost) some old photos ([[Template:PD-Australia|pre 1955]] as post 1955 is rather problematic in regards to copyright) so keep an eye out. ;)  +++$+++ :::::::I would love to see experienced historians (though they may need some help with writing Wiki articles and citing [which is totally different to what they have learnt and are use to]) to write articles on Australian history (Not just about Australia itself but events, locations ect). I'm not trying to say we are no good at it but it would be great to have some more helpers add to the missing areas where we can't or areas we don't even know about (IE: places we never heard of or an event which has been forgotten). Also I'm currently trying to acquire (at my own cost) some old photos ([[Template:PD-Australia|pre 1955]] as post 1955 is rather problematic in regards to copyright) so keep an eye out. ;) [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 01:44, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
275447 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275439 +++$+++ 275444 +++$+++ 2010-07-01 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.277977800E09 +++$+++ Well, I can't really say very much on here. But the talk was an introductory training session. They asked for training for the curators, so we provided it. As for long term goals, there's lots I can imagine happening but it's still early days. In general though, not specifically in this case, there's lots they can do for us, including giving us access to resources, releasing content, improving articles, running Backstage Pass programs (like WMAu has run in Sydney), running Wikimedian in Residence programs (like they're doing at the moment at the British Museum). There's heaps we can do with friendly museums. Bidgee, I would like to try to bring you into an off-site private conversation, if you're interested. I will email you about it shortly. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::::Well, I can't really say very much on here. But the talk was an introductory training session. They asked for training for the curators, so we provided it. As for long term goals, there's lots I can imagine happening but it's still early days. In general though, not specifically in this case, there's lots they can do for us, including giving us access to resources, releasing content, improving articles, running Backstage Pass programs (like WMAu has run in Sydney), running Wikimedian in Residence programs (like they're doing at the moment at the British Museum). There's heaps we can do with friendly museums. Bidgee, I would like to try to bring you into an off-site private conversation, if you're interested. I will email you about it shortly. Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:50, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
275448 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275439 +++$+++ 275447 +++$+++ 2010-07-01 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.278008820E09 +++$+++ I'll be interested to hear it. :)  +++$+++ :::::::I'll be interested to hear it. :) [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 11:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
275449 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275439 +++$+++ 275448 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.278526860E09 +++$+++ Emailed you back. :)  +++$+++ ::::::::Emailed you back. :) [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 11:21, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

537584 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537584 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-09 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.165737540E09 +++$+++ Why isn't [[Encyclopedia Britannica]] a reliable source? -- +++$+++ Why isn't [[Encyclopedia Britannica]] a reliable source? --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 23:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
537585 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537584 +++$+++ 537584 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.165738920E09 +++$+++ Are you certain it's in it? I've got the modern version, and I remember searching there, without success, for info. on Voisava's ethnicity.-- +++$+++ :Are you certain it's in it? I've got the modern version, and I remember searching there, without success, for info. on Voisava's ethnicity.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 00:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
537586 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537584 +++$+++ 537585 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.165801440E09 +++$+++ Check the [[Encyclopedia Britannica Eleventh Edition]]. -- +++$+++ ::Check the [[Encyclopedia Britannica Eleventh Edition]]. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 17:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
537587 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537584 +++$+++ 537586 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.165802520E09 +++$+++ Ok, it's there, but remember to leave an inline citation when you insert \"Serbian\". Ciao,-- +++$+++ :::Ok, it's there, but remember to leave an inline citation when you insert "Serbian". Ciao,--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 18:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
537588 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537584 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-11 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.165899720E09 +++$+++ Actually, since I added it for quite number (n) of times - I don't want to seem like a POV-pusher - so why don't ''You'' (who removed it 3-4-5 times) return it Yourself? -- +++$+++ :::::Actually, since I added it for quite number (n) of times - I don't want to seem like a POV-pusher - so why don't ''You'' (who removed it 3-4-5 times) return it Yourself? --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 21:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
537589 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537584 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.166133360E09 +++$+++ Actually I believe I removed only ''once'', at least in the last six months, and I'm not overtly enthusiastic of placing a piece of info that has not been kept by following editions of wikipedia and also does not result to be in Barleti. But I won't oppose you if you do it.-- +++$+++ ::::::Actually I believe I removed only ''once'', at least in the last six months, and I'm not overtly enthusiastic of placing a piece of info that has not been kept by following editions of wikipedia and also does not result to be in Barleti. But I won't oppose you if you do it.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 13:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
537590 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537584 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-22 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.166856600E09 +++$+++ I added it three times, and You reverted each of those (besides my objections and callings upon EB at the talk page). You're a very, very good-reputation editor, so I'm not going to add it either (it just doesn't seem to be proper to me). -- +++$+++ :::::::I added it three times, and You reverted each of those (besides my objections and callings upon EB at the talk page). You're a very, very good-reputation editor, so I'm not going to add it either (it just doesn't seem to be proper to me). --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 22:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
537591 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537584 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-22 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.166859300E09 +++$+++ You're free not to believe me, but I controlled carefully, and I only reverted you the last time. I had removed also a duplication of information you made, when you rewrote that her mother was called Voisava and her family, which was already in the previous section. As for the first addition, it was removed by Albanau.-- +++$+++ ::::::::You're free not to believe me, but I controlled carefully, and I only reverted you the last time. I had removed also a duplication of information you made, when you rewrote that her mother was called Voisava and her family, which was already in the previous section. As for the first addition, it was removed by Albanau.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 23:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

264361 +++$+++ F.dolarhyde +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-04 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191549060E09 +++$+++ In other words, am I completely on the wrong track in thinking that wikipedians' community trust, and spirit of cooperation, is something to be protected and preserved (as much as possible while also respecting content guidelines), with more respect than it's receiving here?  If I'm right, is there anything I can do about it?  My apologies for the length of this post (I tried to shrink it, honest) -- +++$+++ In other words, am I completely on the wrong track in thinking that wikipedians' community trust, and spirit of cooperation, is something to be protected and preserved (as much as possible while also respecting content guidelines), with more respect than it's receiving here?  If I'm right, is there anything I can do about it?  My apologies for the length of this post (I tried to shrink it, honest) --[[User:F.dolarhyde|F.dolarhyde]] 18:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
264362 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264361 +++$+++ 264361 +++$+++ 2007-10-06 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.191691140E09 +++$+++ I could respond by saying that it's a shame that some people don't have anything better to do with their time other than compiling the specific dates of when episodes of Australian soap operas were broadcast in the different regions in the UK. I'm sure that many people will also consider that 'sad', and the time 'wasted away'. Before throwing more insults, consider: \"people in glass houses...\" My message on your talk page was polite.  +++$+++ :I could respond by saying that it's a shame that some people don't have anything better to do with their time other than compiling the specific dates of when episodes of Australian soap operas were broadcast in the different regions in the UK. I'm sure that many people will also consider that 'sad', and the time 'wasted away'. Before throwing more insults, consider: "people in glass houses..." My message on your talk page was polite. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

544777 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-17 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.197878700E09 +++$+++ If you add that again, you may be reported for 3RR. Please read the policy carefully, as you've almost certainly violated it already. <font color=\"Purple\"> +++$+++ If you add that again, you may be reported for 3RR. Please read the policy carefully, as you've almost certainly violated it already. <font color="Purple">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 00:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
544778 +++$+++ Cla68 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544777 +++$+++ 544777 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.197880620E09 +++$+++ Fortunately for Slim and Crum, tag-teaming isn't, apparently, against policy.  +++$+++ :Fortunately for Slim and Crum, tag-teaming isn't, apparently, against policy. [[User:Cla68|Cla68]] ([[User talk:Cla68|talk]]) 00:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
544779 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544777 +++$+++ 544778 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.197880740E09 +++$+++ What is this about?  Tim, the ultimate collaborative editor, violate 3RR?  Where?  +++$+++ ::What is this about?  Tim, the ultimate collaborative editor, violate 3RR?  Where? [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:39, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
544780 +++$+++ Cla68 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544777 +++$+++ 544779 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.197880800E09 +++$+++ (Replying for Tim) [[Animal testing]].  +++$+++ :::(Replying for Tim) [[Animal testing]]. [[User:Cla68|Cla68]] ([[User talk:Cla68|talk]]) 00:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
544781 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544777 +++$+++ 544777 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.197880860E09 +++$+++ Plesae see the revision history at [[Animal testing]] and the talk age discussion [[Talk:Animal_testing#Suffering]]. I don't think I did violate the policy, since all I did was add a new source each time one was requested. If anybody wants to make a report about this at An\/I though, I would be interested to see what the community thinks about this.  +++$+++ :Plesae see the revision history at [[Animal testing]] and the talk age discussion [[Talk:Animal_testing#Suffering]]. I don't think I did violate the policy, since all I did was add a new source each time one was requested. If anybody wants to make a report about this at An/I though, I would be interested to see what the community thinks about this. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 00:41, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
544782 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544777 +++$+++ 544781 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.197882060E09 +++$+++ I see now.  Well, AN\/I isn't terribly useful in situations like this, and I suspect that a 3RR notice on your talk page will generate sufficient attention to remedy the matter.   +++$+++ :: I see now.  Well, AN/I isn't terribly useful in situations like this, and I suspect that a 3RR notice on your talk page will generate sufficient attention to remedy the matter.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
544783 +++$+++ Cla68 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544777 +++$+++ 544782 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.197882660E09 +++$+++ Well, I already reported it to ANI [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/IncidentArchive341#3RR_allegations_at_Animal_testing|link]].  It may not, as you say, be very useful but it hopefully will bring more attention to the situation.  +++$+++ :::Well, I already reported it to ANI [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive341#3RR_allegations_at_Animal_testing|link]].  It may not, as you say, be very useful but it hopefully will bring more attention to the situation. [[User:Cla68|Cla68]] ([[User talk:Cla68|talk]]) 01:11, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
544784 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544777 +++$+++ 544783 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.197883020E09 +++$+++ Diffs are always helpful.   +++$+++ :::: Diffs are always helpful.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
544785 +++$+++ Cla68 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544777 +++$+++ 544784 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.197883680E09 +++$+++ Good point.  Done.  +++$+++ :::::Good point.  Done. [[User:Cla68|Cla68]] ([[User talk:Cla68|talk]]) 01:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

275450 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-02 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.278063900E09 +++$+++ Sarah - Speaking of \"leaving it in the past,\" so you know, now that I am unblocked I tonight archived my talk page (primarily for the purposes of removing the discussion about the case for notabaility and the article website address off the talk page and into the background archives).  Also left a note for you to see if you approve of the cleanup activities and if done correctly. Let me know if not.  Otherwise, you can remove the line afterwards.  I'm not expecting to do much now other than to ease back into ocassioal regular editing on non-self-involved pages. I've taken your words to heart and am looking forward to try and redeem myself as a productive editor.  Question:  could I ask that you consider blanking the old User pages of Austin3301 and BT4804 as they are now nonexistant users but still refer back to me?  And maybe blank the two former article pages?  I'd really like to make a fresh, clean start if possible.  <small style=\"white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Sarah - Speaking of "leaving it in the past," so you know, now that I am unblocked I tonight archived my talk page (primarily for the purposes of removing the discussion about the case for notabaility and the article website address off the talk page and into the background archives).  Also left a note for you to see if you approve of the cleanup activities and if done correctly. Let me know if not.  Otherwise, you can remove the line afterwards.  I'm not expecting to do much now other than to ease back into ocassioal regular editing on non-self-involved pages. I've taken your words to heart and am looking forward to try and redeem myself as a productive editor.  Question:  could I ask that you consider blanking the old User pages of Austin3301 and BT4804 as they are now nonexistant users but still refer back to me?  And maybe blank the two former article pages?  I'd really like to make a fresh, clean start if possible.  <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;">[[User:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:#008080;">Dmartinaus</span>]] • [[User talk:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:Black;White;">Talk</span>]] </small> 02:45, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
275451 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ 2010-07-02 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.278087960E09 +++$+++ I certainly welcome your participation in articles not related to yourself and I think that is an excellent step forward. I am willing to blank the talk pages of those two accounts. In time we can probably delete the userpages [[iff]] there are no further problems. \"And maybe blank the two former article pages\" What article pages are you referring to? Articles don't normally get blanked but if you could clarify exactly what you're referring to I can see if I can help. I haven't looked at your talk page yet so can't comment on that but will have a looksee shortly.  +++$+++ :I certainly welcome your participation in articles not related to yourself and I think that is an excellent step forward. I am willing to blank the talk pages of those two accounts. In time we can probably delete the userpages [[iff]] there are no further problems. "And maybe blank the two former article pages" What article pages are you referring to? Articles don't normally get blanked but if you could clarify exactly what you're referring to I can see if I can help. I haven't looked at your talk page yet so can't comment on that but will have a looksee shortly. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 09:26, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
275452 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ 275451 +++$+++ 2010-07-02 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.278102360E09 +++$+++ Re the actual opening article pages for \"Don Martin (Austin, Texas) and \"LaFrontera (Round Rock)\" so they instead simply show that they do not exist.  <small style=\"white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::Re the actual opening article pages for "Don Martin (Austin, Texas) and "LaFrontera (Round Rock)" so they instead simply show that they do not exist.  <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;">[[User:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:#008080;">Dmartinaus</span>]] • [[User talk:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:Black;White;">Talk</span>]] </small> 13:26, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
275453 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ 275451 +++$+++ 2010-07-02 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.278102540E09 +++$+++ PS - the talk page of Austin3301 was blanked but not the archive, if that is what you meant to do.  Thanks.   <small style=\"white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::PS - the talk page of Austin3301 was blanked but not the archive, if that is what you meant to do.  Thanks.   <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;">[[User:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:#008080;">Dmartinaus</span>]] • [[User talk:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:Black;White;">Talk</span>]] </small> 13:29, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
275454 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ 275453 +++$+++ 2010-07-02 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.278104460E09 +++$+++ The Don Martin and Lafrontera articles are deleted. If you mean the writing in the pink and white boxes which shows when you click on the redlinks [[Don Martin (Austin, Texas)]] and [[La Frontera (Round Rock, Texas)]], there's nothing we can do about that as those are standard MediaWiki templates which are part of the software. So there's nothing actually there on those pages which can be blanked or deleted. Rather, it's part of the software. The pink box contains all the log entries for that page and the white box is the standard introduction template that shows on all pages that don't exist. Yes, I archived Austin3301 (that is what that account had been doing) and then blanked the main talk page. The other account didn't seem to have an archive, so I just blanked it. I think they're all right like that for now. The archive won't show up in Google searches.  +++$+++ :::The Don Martin and Lafrontera articles are deleted. If you mean the writing in the pink and white boxes which shows when you click on the redlinks [[Don Martin (Austin, Texas)]] and [[La Frontera (Round Rock, Texas)]], there's nothing we can do about that as those are standard MediaWiki templates which are part of the software. So there's nothing actually there on those pages which can be blanked or deleted. Rather, it's part of the software. The pink box contains all the log entries for that page and the white box is the standard introduction template that shows on all pages that don't exist. Yes, I archived Austin3301 (that is what that account had been doing) and then blanked the main talk page. The other account didn't seem to have an archive, so I just blanked it. I think they're all right like that for now. The archive won't show up in Google searches. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 14:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
275455 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ 275454 +++$+++ 2010-07-02 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.278105840E09 +++$+++ Understood.  The pink part is fine and I guess I was thinking of something else. Sorry. As for the two userpages, 4804BT shows it is blocked indef due to SPI, but Austin3301 says it is blocked indef due to [[User:Dmartinaus]] SPI.  Not sure why one is one way and not the other.  But it would be really great and most appreciated if you could make them both conform to the first style (the 4804BT style).  Part of the \"fresh start.\"  You decide if and when to blank Austin3301 and 4804BT...when and if or if ever you think it is appropriate. Meanwhile, if you don't object, I'm going to add the Google NOINDEX code on the relevant pages to take them off Google bot searching. <small style=\"white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::::Understood.  The pink part is fine and I guess I was thinking of something else. Sorry. As for the two userpages, 4804BT shows it is blocked indef due to SPI, but Austin3301 says it is blocked indef due to [[User:Dmartinaus]] SPI.  Not sure why one is one way and not the other.  But it would be really great and most appreciated if you could make them both conform to the first style (the 4804BT style).  Part of the "fresh start."  You decide if and when to blank Austin3301 and 4804BT...when and if or if ever you think it is appropriate. Meanwhile, if you don't object, I'm going to add the Google NOINDEX code on the relevant pages to take them off Google bot searching. <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;">[[User:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:#008080;">Dmartinaus</span>]] • [[User talk:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:Black;White;">Talk</span>]] </small> 14:24, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
275456 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ 275455 +++$+++ 2010-07-03 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.278154740E09 +++$+++ I will put no indexing on the userpages but user talk pages and sub-pages aren't indexed by google anyway so the tags don't have any effect on user talk pages. I'm not sure what you mean by the tags being different between Austin and BT? They look the same to me and they both seem to be linking to the dmartinaus SPI (as they should). If there are no further problems, we will be able to delete or at least blank a lot of these things in due course but your block has only just expired a couple of days ago and there's a limit to what we can remove, particularly this soon after an SPI block. You were warned numerous times about things showing up in google and the fact that this is not a private forum so your actions are viewable and searchable by others but you continued on regardless. We can't protect people from their own actions if they won't take advice aimed at protecting them.  +++$+++ :::::I will put no indexing on the userpages but user talk pages and sub-pages aren't indexed by google anyway so the tags don't have any effect on user talk pages. I'm not sure what you mean by the tags being different between Austin and BT? They look the same to me and they both seem to be linking to the dmartinaus SPI (as they should). If there are no further problems, we will be able to delete or at least blank a lot of these things in due course but your block has only just expired a couple of days ago and there's a limit to what we can remove, particularly this soon after an SPI block. You were warned numerous times about things showing up in google and the fact that this is not a private forum so your actions are viewable and searchable by others but you continued on regardless. We can't protect people from their own actions if they won't take advice aimed at protecting them. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 03:59, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
275457 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ 275456 +++$+++ 2010-07-03 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.278154860E09 +++$+++ Nevermind, I see you've already put no index on those pages.  +++$+++ ::::::Nevermind, I see you've already put no index on those pages. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 04:01, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
275458 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ 275457 +++$+++ 2010-07-03 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.278158100E09 +++$+++ Actually I am not worried about Google although I did and do appreciate your warning.  Between my personal name and company name searches this week only one ref to Wikipedia comes up and it is inconsequential.  I've only been unblocked for one day, and I've spent that time doing various minor cleanup, archiving, a new sig, headers on my pages, and apologizing to several users.  But that's done now and I've started editing again tonight.   For some reason the tags on 4084BT (did NOT ref SPI Dmartinaus) and Austin3301 (DID ref SPI Dmartinaus) were different, but unless I am loosing my mind they changed to BOTH ref SPI Dmartinaus late today. I was hoping they might both be changed to match the former.  But all in good time....  I'll get back to productive editing as Deskana has requested.  <small style=\"white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :::::::Actually I am not worried about Google although I did and do appreciate your warning.  Between my personal name and company name searches this week only one ref to Wikipedia comes up and it is inconsequential.  I've only been unblocked for one day, and I've spent that time doing various minor cleanup, archiving, a new sig, headers on my pages, and apologizing to several users.  But that's done now and I've started editing again tonight.   For some reason the tags on 4084BT (did NOT ref SPI Dmartinaus) and Austin3301 (DID ref SPI Dmartinaus) were different, but unless I am loosing my mind they changed to BOTH ref SPI Dmartinaus late today. I was hoping they might both be changed to match the former.  But all in good time....  I'll get back to productive editing as Deskana has requested.  <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;">[[User:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:#008080;">Dmartinaus</span>]] • [[User talk:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:Black;White;">Talk</span>]] </small> 04:55, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
275459 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ 275458 +++$+++ 2010-07-04 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.278233700E09 +++$+++ Actually there are two articles:  1)Request for Peer Review which involves one editor's suggestion of edits to the now-non-existant article; and 2) Re the short-lived request for mediation which was done inappropriately and incorrectly by me and immediately rejected.   I have asked for both to be removed, although may not have done so correctly.  Just wanted you to know.  <small style=\"white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::::::::Actually there are two articles:  1)Request for Peer Review which involves one editor's suggestion of edits to the now-non-existant article; and 2) Re the short-lived request for mediation which was done inappropriately and incorrectly by me and immediately rejected.   I have asked for both to be removed, although may not have done so correctly.  Just wanted you to know.  <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #008080;padding:1px;">[[User:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:#008080;">Dmartinaus</span>]] • [[User talk:Dmartinaus|<span style="color:Black;White;">Talk</span>]] </small> 01:55, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
275460 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ 275459 +++$+++ 2010-07-04 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.278237540E09 +++$+++ As the prod tag says, prods are only for articles, not for removing project-space discussions. I'm growing increasingly concerned at the way you are systematically \"cleaning up\". We do not usually remove or change discussion pages unless there is sensitive information on the pages and if that's the case, we can deal with that but we do not clean up the records of people's activities here. The pages are kept as archives for any future discussions. If you have a valid reason for wanting pages to be removed please tell us and we can see if your reasons fit with Wikipedia's deletion policies but otherwise you need to move on and leave these pages alone. Wikipedia's deletion policy is very strict and it does not allow for pages to be deleted merely because a user who is days off a block for abusing multiple accounts wants to \"clean up\". My advice to you is to stop focusing on \"cleaning up\" your history and instead focus on your present.  +++$+++ :::::::::As the prod tag says, prods are only for articles, not for removing project-space discussions. I'm growing increasingly concerned at the way you are systematically "cleaning up". We do not usually remove or change discussion pages unless there is sensitive information on the pages and if that's the case, we can deal with that but we do not clean up the records of people's activities here. The pages are kept as archives for any future discussions. If you have a valid reason for wanting pages to be removed please tell us and we can see if your reasons fit with Wikipedia's deletion policies but otherwise you need to move on and leave these pages alone. Wikipedia's deletion policy is very strict and it does not allow for pages to be deleted merely because a user who is days off a block for abusing multiple accounts wants to "clean up". My advice to you is to stop focusing on "cleaning up" your history and instead focus on your present. [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 02:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
275461 +++$+++ Dmartinaus +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 275450 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-11 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.278891540E09 +++$+++ I've merely cleaned up my own talk page and archived it all.  Nothing is gone.  And I created a signature.  The \"sensitive\" information is completely unfactual statement, accusations and name-calling by NN, which Yes, I do want removed.  That doesn't seem at all unreasonable to me.  You lately have semmed to have become a great supporter of NN's in all this, which I truly do not understnad.  His statements are simply not true!  Do I need to go back and ennumerate them every one?    +++$+++ :::::::::::I've merely cleaned up my own talk page and archived it all.  Nothing is gone.  And I created a signature.  The "sensitive" information is completely unfactual statement, accusations and name-calling by NN, which Yes, I do want removed.  That doesn't seem at all unreasonable to me.  You lately have semmed to have become a great supporter of NN's in all this, which I truly do not understnad.  His statements are simply not true!  Do I need to go back and ennumerate them every one?   [[User:Dmartinaus|Dmartinaus]] ([[User talk:Dmartinaus|talk]]) 16:39, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

13308 +++$+++ SkagitRiverQueen +++$+++ Format +++$+++ 13308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-24 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.264337820E09 +++$+++ ( +++$+++ ([[User talk:SkagitRiverQueen|talk]]) 04:57, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
13309 +++$+++ Wildhartlivie +++$+++ Format +++$+++ 13308 +++$+++ 13308 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.264338300E09 +++$+++ No, in fact, an entire paragraph was not removed. Two paragraphs were merged into one, simply by removing a full stop between them. Please feel free to edit and not be discouraged by having your edits jumped on by anyone as they have been.  +++$+++ :No, in fact, an entire paragraph was not removed. Two paragraphs were merged into one, simply by removing a full stop between them. Please feel free to edit and not be discouraged by having your edits jumped on by anyone as they have been. [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 05:05, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
13310 +++$+++ SkagitRiverQueen +++$+++ Format +++$+++ 13308 +++$+++ 13309 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.264338540E09 +++$+++ In case you didn't notice, I told Format specifically that I *wasn't* trying to discourage him\/her.  Further, I didn't \"jump\" on anyone.  False accusations and aspersions aren't wise nor advised, WHL.  -- +++$+++ ::In case you didn't notice, I told Format specifically that I *wasn't* trying to discourage him/her.  Further, I didn't "jump" on anyone.  False accusations and aspersions aren't wise nor advised, WHL.  --[[User:SkagitRiverQueen|SkagitRiverQueen]] ([[User talk:SkagitRiverQueen|talk]]) 05:09, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
13311 +++$+++ Wildhartlivie +++$+++ Format +++$+++ 13308 +++$+++ 13310 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.264339320E09 +++$+++ Kindly do not address me. I made no false accusations or cast no aspersions here, although you do appear to be trying to cast it that way. Keep your warnings to yourself. I told him not to be discouraged by having his edits jumped on. That applies anywhere, not just to you. Format, feel free to email me and keep it up.  +++$+++ :::Kindly do not address me. I made no false accusations or cast no aspersions here, although you do appear to be trying to cast it that way. Keep your warnings to yourself. I told him not to be discouraged by having his edits jumped on. That applies anywhere, not just to you. Format, feel free to email me and keep it up. [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 05:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

537598 +++$+++ Yannismarou +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537598 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-17 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166412480E09 +++$+++ Cheers!-- +++$+++ Cheers!--[[User:Yannismarou|Yannismarou]] 19:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
537599 +++$+++ Yannismarou +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537598 +++$+++ 537598 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.166415180E09 +++$+++ And I was waiting to hear the magic solution! Anyway, good luck with Chad! When you're over with it, Greece will still be waiting for you! Regards!-- +++$+++ :And I was waiting to hear the magic solution! Anyway, good luck with Chad! When you're over with it, Greece will still be waiting for you! Regards!--[[User:Yannismarou|Yannismarou]] 20:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

13312 +++$+++ SkagitRiverQueen +++$+++ Format +++$+++ 13312 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-24 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.264406040E09 +++$+++ {{od}}WHL - If you don't make comments about me, you won't have to worry about whether or not I address you. I gave no warnings.  You most certainly did attempt to cast aspersions on my character with the \"[don't] be discouraged\" and \"jumped on\" comment - others in WP apparently believe your lies, but I'm not one of them.  -- +++$+++ {{od}}WHL - If you don't make comments about me, you won't have to worry about whether or not I address you. I gave no warnings.  You most certainly did attempt to cast aspersions on my character with the "[don't] be discouraged" and "jumped on" comment - others in WP apparently believe your lies, but I'm not one of them.  --[[User:SkagitRiverQueen|SkagitRiverQueen]] ([[User talk:SkagitRiverQueen|talk]]) 23:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
13313 +++$+++ Wildhartlivie +++$+++ Format +++$+++ 13312 +++$+++ 13312 +++$+++ 2010-01-25 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.264412100E09 +++$+++ Again, please do not address me, in any form. There were no comments made about you, only about his edits being reverted. Take it how you like, but please stop dragging your issues to Format's talk page.   +++$+++ :Again, please do not address me, in any form. There were no comments made about you, only about his edits being reverted. Take it how you like, but please stop dragging your issues to Format's talk page.  [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 01:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
13314 +++$+++ Format +++$+++ Format +++$+++ 13312 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.264339620E09 +++$+++ Thanks Wildhartlivie.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks Wildhartlivie. [[User:Format|Format]] ([[User talk:Format#top|talk]]) 05:27, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
13315 +++$+++ Crohnie +++$+++ Format +++$+++ 13312 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.264360740E09 +++$+++ Format, I saw the edits you made and I liked them.  I hope you will return to the article and continue.  We need more editors at this article.  I've been having troubles also having my edits stick so I'd love to see others participate.  The more the merrier is the way I feel about it.  Please do return and help this article, it's really needed.  Happy editing, -- +++$+++ :::::Format, I saw the edits you made and I liked them.  I hope you will return to the article and continue.  We need more editors at this article.  I've been having troubles also having my edits stick so I'd love to see others participate.  The more the merrier is the way I feel about it.  Please do return and help this article, it's really needed.  Happy editing, --[[User:Crohnie|<span style="color:purpled ">'''Crohnie'''</span><span style="color:deeppink">'''Gal'''</span>]][[User talk:Crohnie|<span style="color:deepskyblue"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 11:19, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

611476 +++$+++ Mike Selinker +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611476 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-25 09:44:00 +++$+++ 1.303749840E09 +++$+++ Hi, Kevin. Just thought you would like to know that you have a typo in the header of [[:File:Top_Wikipedians_compared_to_the_rest_of_the_community.png]]. It says \"Compated,\" not \"Compared.\"-- +++$+++ Hi, Kevin. Just thought you would like to know that you have a typo in the header of [[:File:Top_Wikipedians_compared_to_the_rest_of_the_community.png]]. It says "Compated," not "Compared."--[[User:Mike Selinker|Mike Selinker]] ([[User talk:Mike Selinker|talk]]) 09:44, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
611477 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611476 +++$+++ 611476 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.303774860E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I'll get right on fixing that.  +++$+++ :Thanks! I'll get right on fixing that. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 16:41, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
611478 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611476 +++$+++ 611476 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.303775580E09 +++$+++ Wait, another user did that. I'm planning on fixing the chart soon though as there are more things to be added but that will probably be Friday at the earliest.  +++$+++ :Wait, another user did that. I'm planning on fixing the chart soon though as there are more things to be added but that will probably be Friday at the earliest. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 16:53, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
611479 +++$+++ Mike Selinker +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611476 +++$+++ 611478 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.303781100E09 +++$+++ Oh, I see now. I will ping [[User:Sven Manguard]] too.-- +++$+++ ::Oh, I see now. I will ping [[User:Sven Manguard]] too.--[[User:Mike Selinker|Mike Selinker]] ([[User talk:Mike Selinker|talk]]) 18:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
611480 +++$+++ Mike Selinker +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611476 +++$+++ 611479 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.303783560E09 +++$+++ All fixed by Sven Manguard.-- +++$+++ :::All fixed by Sven Manguard.--[[User:Mike Selinker|Mike Selinker]] ([[User talk:Mike Selinker|talk]]) 19:06, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

537604 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-19 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.166593860E09 +++$+++ Please check your email. <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ Please check your email. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 21:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
537605 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537604 +++$+++ 537604 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.166594940E09 +++$+++ Ah. Well all the email said was, \"could you please semi-protect [[Patras]]?\" :-) Thanks, <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :Ah. Well all the email said was, "could you please semi-protect [[Patras]]?" :-) Thanks, <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 22:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
537606 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537604 +++$+++ 537605 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.166599920E09 +++$+++ Sorry Al, I thought you really were offline when I reverted (saw your contribs had stopped). The rest we will discuss in the said talk. :-)  +++$+++ ::Sorry Al, I thought you really were offline when I reverted (saw your contribs had stopped). The rest we will discuss in the said talk. :-) [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 23:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

275462 +++$+++ Sango123 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-06 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.131272700E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ -- [[User:Sango123|<font color="#00008B">Sango</font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="008000">123</font>]] [[User talk:Sango123|<font color="#00008B">(talk)</font>]] 02:25, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
275463 +++$+++ Lion King +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275462 +++$+++ 275462 +++$+++ 2005-11-28 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.133232780E09 +++$+++ Why did you reverse statistical fact on the Dennis Wise Page  +++$+++ *Why did you reverse statistical fact on the Dennis Wise Page [[User:Lion King|Lion King]] 18:53, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
275464 +++$+++ Lion King +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275462 +++$+++ 275463 +++$+++ 2005-12-01 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.133498940E09 +++$+++ It's no skin off my rice puddin' son- It's in the Millwall article, so I don't care! Touch that and yer Hovis! Be lucky,  +++$+++ ::It's no skin off my rice puddin' son- It's in the Millwall article, so I don't care! Touch that and yer Hovis! Be lucky, [[User:Lion King|Lion King]] 20:49, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
275465 +++$+++ Lion King +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275462 +++$+++ 275462 +++$+++ 2005-12-11 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.134341460E09 +++$+++ How Millwall reached the final is not relevant- they reached it-end of. You are putting this info in to deminish Millwall's achievment, forgeting that by having to play teams from the lower leagues cost us sixteen players from our squad due to being kicked off the park and being suspended for fouls they did not commit, hence the need to take a seventeen year old boy to Cardiff.  Please do not put this in again, IT IS IRRELEVANT!  +++$+++ *How Millwall reached the final is not relevant- they reached it-end of. You are putting this info in to deminish Millwall's achievment, forgeting that by having to play teams from the lower leagues cost us sixteen players from our squad due to being kicked off the park and being suspended for fouls they did not commit, hence the need to take a seventeen year old boy to Cardiff.  Please do not put this in again, IT IS IRRELEVANT! [[User:Lion King|Lion King]] 14:51, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
275466 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275462 +++$+++ 275465 +++$+++ 2005-12-11 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.134344700E09 +++$+++ The article notes that: ''\"Millwall qualified for the final from the lowest league position in the history of the competition, and took to the field in Cardiff 25 league places below their opponents. They were only the 24th team from outside of the top flight to play in the final.\"'' which is fine. Adding that they didn't face a team from a higher division adds perspective and is relevant. Wikipedia is not here just to rattle off Millwall F.C.'s achievements while glossing over less favourable facts that \"diminish Millwall's achievment.\"  +++$+++ **The article notes that: ''"Millwall qualified for the final from the lowest league position in the history of the competition, and took to the field in Cardiff 25 league places below their opponents. They were only the 24th team from outside of the top flight to play in the final."'' which is fine. Adding that they didn't face a team from a higher division adds perspective and is relevant. Wikipedia is not here just to rattle off Millwall F.C.'s achievements while glossing over less favourable facts that "diminish Millwall's achievment." [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 15:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
275467 +++$+++ Lion King +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275462 +++$+++ 275462 +++$+++ 2005-12-11 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.134347940E09 +++$+++ Did someone remove your brain and replace it with a peanut? I've told you to leave messages on MY PAGE- who died and made you the football police? Have you ever set foot in ANY ground? I doubt it- you know nothing about Millwall fans do you? And don't tell me why Wikipedia is here, you arrogant little Merchant!  +++$+++ :Did someone remove your brain and replace it with a peanut? I've told you to leave messages on MY PAGE- who died and made you the football police? Have you ever set foot in ANY ground? I doubt it- you know nothing about Millwall fans do you? And don't tell me why Wikipedia is here, you arrogant little Merchant! [[User:Lion King|Lion King]] 16:39, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
275468 +++$+++ Lion King +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275462 +++$+++ 275462 +++$+++ 2005-12-11 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.134351000E09 +++$+++ Upsest me dear boy? No of course not, just a bit a playfull football banter- you should know that, it's one of The terms and conditions of a season tickect.  +++$+++ *Upsest me dear boy? No of course not, just a bit a playfull football banter- you should know that, it's one of The terms and conditions of a season tickect. [[User:Lion King|Lion King]] 17:30, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

537607 +++$+++ Baristarim +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537607 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-20 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.166659320E09 +++$+++ I just saw your post because of edit conflicts. I am aware of those. But can I simply create articles for Point and email twenty friends to take part in its AfD? This is extremely frustrating and unhelpful, and detrimental to Wikipedia. Have any of those users been warned? Please read the whole AfD again, there are some worrying patterns. None of those users have disclosed how they came across this article. I am finished with that AfD in any case. So, don't worry. What do you think about what happened in the AfD? Cheers!  +++$+++ I just saw your post because of edit conflicts. I am aware of those. But can I simply create articles for Point and email twenty friends to take part in its AfD? This is extremely frustrating and unhelpful, and detrimental to Wikipedia. Have any of those users been warned? Please read the whole AfD again, there are some worrying patterns. None of those users have disclosed how they came across this article. I am finished with that AfD in any case. So, don't worry. What do you think about what happened in the AfD? Cheers! [[User:Baristarim|Baristarim]] 16:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
537608 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537607 +++$+++ 537607 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.166660460E09 +++$+++ Barristarim, I'm happy you've calmed down now. I have no reasons for believing that many of them knew of it through the link to FPS, as I did, as FPS is strongly connected with Greek topics, so it's not so strange many of them came to knew of it. You're entitled to have your suspects, but unless you can substantiate them, and bring serious elements before the [[WP:AN\/I]], it's better to keep them for yourself. Cheers,-- +++$+++ :Barristarim, I'm happy you've calmed down now. I have no reasons for believing that many of them knew of it through the link to FPS, as I did, as FPS is strongly connected with Greek topics, so it's not so strange many of them came to knew of it. You're entitled to have your suspects, but unless you can substantiate them, and bring serious elements before the [[WP:AN/I]], it's better to keep them for yourself. Cheers,--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:21, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

537610 +++$+++ Eupator +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537610 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-22 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.166836620E09 +++$+++ What do you think about the balance between primary and secondary sources now?-- +++$+++ What do you think about the balance between primary and secondary sources now?--[[User:Eupator|Eupator]] 17:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
537611 +++$+++ Eupator +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537610 +++$+++ 537610 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.166941560E09 +++$+++ Check it out, I have implemented you suggestions.-- +++$+++ :Check it out, I have implemented you suggestions.--[[User:Eupator|Eupator]] 22:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

13324 +++$+++ Hapsiainen +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-25 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.130307900E09 +++$+++ If you can't move a page with Move function, ask an administrator to move it at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]]. - +++$+++ If you can't move a page with Move function, ask an administrator to move it at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]]. -[[User:Hapsiainen|Hapsiainen]] 23:25, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
13325 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13324 +++$+++ 13324 +++$+++ 2005-10-27 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.130431620E09 +++$+++ Ok, understood. I will bear this in mind for the future. Cheers.  +++$+++ *Ok, understood. I will bear this in mind for the future. Cheers. [[User:Gram123|Gram]] 09:47, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

275469 +++$+++ Lion King +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275469 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-15 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.134645120E09 +++$+++ Have a look at what you've kicked off by wanting to put one stupid sentence into the Millwall article you sad geek  +++$+++ Have a look at what you've kicked off by wanting to put one stupid sentence into the Millwall article you sad geek [[User:Lion King|Lion King]] 03:12, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
275470 +++$+++ Lion King +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275469 +++$+++ 275469 +++$+++ 2005-12-16 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.134778140E09 +++$+++ Insult? No, I see it as a statement of fact.  +++$+++ *Insult? No, I see it as a statement of fact. [[User:Lion King|Lion King]] 16:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

13326 +++$+++ Grm_wnr +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-30 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.130737860E09 +++$+++ good work on the Late Night Tales albums. I'd always use categories for large series of such items, and when there are more DJ-Kicks articles they will get one too. A suggestion: Maybe you should add a {{tl|album infobox}} to your album stubs? You don't have to fill out all the blanks in them, but in my opinion, an album article with a complete infobox is nearly past the stub stage already. I've added one to [[DJ-Kicks: Nightmares on Wax]] now, you can see how it's done there - more information is at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums#Table]]. Anyway, good work -  and keep it up! --<span style=\"font-family:monospace\">&nbsp; +++$+++ good work on the Late Night Tales albums. I'd always use categories for large series of such items, and when there are more DJ-Kicks articles they will get one too. A suggestion: Maybe you should add a {{tl|album infobox}} to your album stubs? You don't have to fill out all the blanks in them, but in my opinion, an album article with a complete infobox is nearly past the stub stage already. I've added one to [[DJ-Kicks: Nightmares on Wax]] now, you can see how it's done there - more information is at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums#Table]]. Anyway, good work -  and keep it up! --<span style="font-family:monospace">&nbsp;[[User:Grm_wnr|grm_wnr]] </span>[[User_talk:Grm_wnr|<span style="border:1px solid;color:black;font-size:9px;padding:2px 1px 0px 1px">Esc</span>]] 21:51, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
13327 +++$+++ Grm_wnr +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13326 +++$+++ 13326 +++$+++ 2005-10-31 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.130746860E09 +++$+++ [[:Category:Aim albums]] is already done right (except that all categories should have supercategories, which I've already added). You just have to put \"<nowiki>[[Category:Grand Central Records albums]]<\/nowiki>\" into the article text, save, then click the red link in the categories bar and create the category page (with supercategories - the Grand Central one would get [[:Category:Albums by record label]]).  After that it should work. A tip: When linking to a category, use a colon before the Category name, like this: \"<nowiki>[[:Category:Grand Central Records albums]]<\/nowiki>\", which creates [[:Category:Grand Central Records albums]]. Without the colon, you just put the page into the category, and the link isn't displayed. I hope that helps - I have to go to bed now and can't categorize the pages myself, but if there are still problems I can help you tomorrow. --<span style=\"font-family:monospace\">&nbsp; +++$+++ :[[:Category:Aim albums]] is already done right (except that all categories should have supercategories, which I've already added). You just have to put "<nowiki>[[Category:Grand Central Records albums]]</nowiki>" into the article text, save, then click the red link in the categories bar and create the category page (with supercategories - the Grand Central one would get [[:Category:Albums by record label]]).  After that it should work. A tip: When linking to a category, use a colon before the Category name, like this: "<nowiki>[[:Category:Grand Central Records albums]]</nowiki>", which creates [[:Category:Grand Central Records albums]]. Without the colon, you just put the page into the category, and the link isn't displayed. I hope that helps - I have to go to bed now and can't categorize the pages myself, but if there are still problems I can help you tomorrow. --<span style="font-family:monospace">&nbsp;[[User:Grm_wnr|grm_wnr]] </span>[[User_talk:Grm_wnr|<span style="border:1px solid;color:black;font-size:9px;padding:2px 1px 0px 1px">Esc</span>]] 00:21, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

13328 +++$+++ Warpozio +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-04 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.131163080E09 +++$+++ Please check also [[List of record labels]], [[List of independent UK record labels]], [[List of electronic music record labels]], [[List of jungle and drum n bass record labels]] who all use this method (most of the time).  +++$+++ Please check also [[List of record labels]], [[List of independent UK record labels]], [[List of electronic music record labels]], [[List of jungle and drum n bass record labels]] who all use this method (most of the time). [[User:Warpozio|warpozio]] 19:58, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
13329 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13328 +++$+++ 13328 +++$+++ 2005-11-06 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.131318600E09 +++$+++ Ok.  +++$+++ * Ok. [[User:Gram123|Gram]] 15:10, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

13330 +++$+++ Junior aspirin +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-15 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.134710460E09 +++$+++ yeah i just rotated the tracks and titles, it just makes more sence to me. i am slowly adding the other [[Fabric Mix Albums]] so was just keaping it consistent.  +++$+++ yeah i just rotated the tracks and titles, it just makes more sence to me. i am slowly adding the other [[Fabric Mix Albums]] so was just keaping it consistent. [[User:Junior aspirin|Junior Aspirin]] 21:21, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
13331 +++$+++ Junior aspirin +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13330 +++$+++ 13330 +++$+++ 2005-12-16 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.134791160E09 +++$+++ ok thanks, i didnt realise the was a standard. i will change the others to match, thanks for clarifying.  +++$+++ * ok thanks, i didnt realise the was a standard. i will change the others to match, thanks for clarifying. [[User:Junior aspirin|Junior Aspirin]] 19:46, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

537619 +++$+++ delldot +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-26 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.167191820E09 +++$+++ Hey, are you reporting 85.73.74.181 on [[WP:ANI]] as a sock of the greek chauvanist junta guy, or shall I? Peace,  +++$+++ Hey, are you reporting 85.73.74.181 on [[WP:ANI]] as a sock of the greek chauvanist junta guy, or shall I? Peace, [[user:delldot|delldot]] | <small>[[user talk:delldot|talk]]</small> 19:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
537620 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537619 +++$+++ 537619 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.167192240E09 +++$+++ Unfotunately, it would be only a loss of time; it's dear community-banned Kaltsef, and his IP is dynamic, and not static.-- +++$+++ :Unfotunately, it would be only a loss of time; it's dear community-banned Kaltsef, and his IP is dynamic, and not static.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 20:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

13332 +++$+++ IainP +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-27 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.135672380E09 +++$+++ Because I'm an arse and despite changing the link you (rightly) corrected to the version you corrected *from*, I forgot to change it back wnen I swapped the mis-spelt article over from it's redirection. And if that makes no sense, drop me message and I'll explain it better when I'm sober...  +++$+++ Because I'm an arse and despite changing the link you (rightly) corrected to the version you corrected *from*, I forgot to change it back wnen I swapped the mis-spelt article over from it's redirection. And if that makes no sense, drop me message and I'll explain it better when I'm sober... [[User:IainP|IainP]] [[User talk:IainP|(talk)]] 00:33, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
13333 +++$+++ Jahsonic +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13332 +++$+++ 13332 +++$+++ 2006-01-03 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.136357760E09 +++$+++ You can find these templates by editing the page that hosts it and checking at the bottom of the page for the template. Here is the one for European cinema http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Template:EuropeanCinema  -- +++$+++ :You can find these templates by editing the page that hosts it and checking at the bottom of the page for the template. Here is the one for European cinema http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:EuropeanCinema  --[[User:Jahsonic|Jahsonic]] 22:56, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

537621 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-26 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.167194700E09 +++$+++ Re [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Republic_of_Macedonia&curid=41978&diff=96593476&oldid=96567746 this], I know it is the case, but I cannot provide a source. I had seen that addition earlier and didn't revert it. You may consider re-adding it and put a {{tl|fact}} tag.  +++$+++ Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Republic_of_Macedonia&curid=41978&diff=96593476&oldid=96567746 this], I know it is the case, but I cannot provide a source. I had seen that addition earlier and didn't revert it. You may consider re-adding it and put a {{tl|fact}} tag. [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 20:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
537622 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537621 +++$+++ 537621 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.167195780E09 +++$+++ Done. BTW, have you got my e-mail? Ciao,-- +++$+++ :Done. BTW, have you got my e-mail? Ciao,--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

13335 +++$+++ Palm dogg +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13335 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-26 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.138302000E09 +++$+++ I couldn't help but notice (Edit Wars, grrr...) that you resumed doing some revamp work on the ''Ran'' page.  I'm getting another page ready for a Featured Article nomination ([[Battle of Badr]]) but afterwards I was going to turn my attention back to Ran, now that I have the Criterion Edition and Stephen Prince's \"The Warrior's Camera\".  Let me know if you're interested in collaborating. (This probably wouldn't be for another week or so)  +++$+++ I couldn't help but notice (Edit Wars, grrr...) that you resumed doing some revamp work on the ''Ran'' page.  I'm getting another page ready for a Featured Article nomination ([[Battle of Badr]]) but afterwards I was going to turn my attention back to Ran, now that I have the Criterion Edition and Stephen Prince's "The Warrior's Camera".  Let me know if you're interested in collaborating. (This probably wouldn't be for another week or so) [[User:Palm dogg|Palm_Dogg]] 11:00, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
13336 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13335 +++$+++ 13335 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.138303200E09 +++$+++ As you may guess from my User page, I tend to primarily edit entertainment articles that I'm interested in. Ran is in my watchlist, as I'd added the DVD cover pic back in August, not long after I'd bought and watched the film. However, I've only seen it once (too many DVDs to watch) and the recent revamping was done in repsonse to seeing the <nowiki>{{peerreview}}<\/nowiki> template, and the to assist with the systematic removal of unnecessary date links (try doing a whatlinkshere to a date article!). As such, I don't know how much help I'd be, but I'll certainly keep an eye on proceedings and provide some input if I can.  +++$+++ * As you may guess from my User page, I tend to primarily edit entertainment articles that I'm interested in. Ran is in my watchlist, as I'd added the DVD cover pic back in August, not long after I'd bought and watched the film. However, I've only seen it once (too many DVDs to watch) and the recent revamping was done in repsonse to seeing the <nowiki>{{peerreview}}</nowiki> template, and the to assist with the systematic removal of unnecessary date links (try doing a whatlinkshere to a date article!). As such, I don't know how much help I'd be, but I'll certainly keep an eye on proceedings and provide some input if I can. [[User:Gram123|Gram]] 11:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

537625 +++$+++ GiorgioOrsini +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-27 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.167269100E09 +++$+++ What is the problem? Is it forbidden and why???-- +++$+++ What is the problem? Is it forbidden and why???--[[User:GiorgioOrsini|GiorgioOrsini]] 17:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
537626 +++$+++ GiorgioOrsini +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537625 +++$+++ 537625 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.167270120E09 +++$+++ By the bye I removed all messages posted to a number of editors informing them about Requested moves-- +++$+++ :By the bye I removed all messages posted to a number of editors informing them about Requested moves--[[User:GiorgioOrsini|GiorgioOrsini]] 17:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
537627 +++$+++ GiorgioOrsini +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537625 +++$+++ 537626 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.167275280E09 +++$+++ Your point of view, as given on my talk pages, is completely subjective and an unnecessary exaggeration.-- +++$+++ ::Your point of view, as given on my talk pages, is completely subjective and an unnecessary exaggeration.--[[User:GiorgioOrsini|GiorgioOrsini]] 19:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

275482 +++$+++ Mark272 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-25 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.151268360E09 +++$+++ It's a strange one since he isn't vandalising (in the strictest sense), yet is continuously bringing down the quality of articles. I think he genuinely thinks he's helping (although you think he'd get the point after ten reverts). If he doesn't look at his talk page, then it will continue. Anyway, at least there's more than one of us keeping an eye on it.  +++$+++ It's a strange one since he isn't vandalising (in the strictest sense), yet is continuously bringing down the quality of articles. I think he genuinely thinks he's helping (although you think he'd get the point after ten reverts). If he doesn't look at his talk page, then it will continue. Anyway, at least there's more than one of us keeping an eye on it. [[User:Mark272|Mark272]] 13:46, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
275483 +++$+++ Mark272 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275482 +++$+++ 275482 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.152678240E09 +++$+++ Check out the latest thing going at [[Football in regions of England]].  +++$+++ :Check out the latest thing going at [[Football in regions of England]]. [[User:Mark272|Mark272]] 21:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
275484 +++$+++ Mark272 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275482 +++$+++ 275482 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.152679260E09 +++$+++ I can't think of anything other than perhaps leaving tags on that page might prompt him to try and contact me.  +++$+++ :I can't think of anything other than perhaps leaving tags on that page might prompt him to try and contact me. [[User:Mark272|Mark272]] 21:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

13339 +++$+++ Vastu +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-14 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.147609380E09 +++$+++ I notaced that the old eastern cinema article has been narrowed down into East Asian cinema - but isnt this a kinda unfair exclusion?  Most people would consider India to be part of the east asian cultural block, especially given the closeness of South East Asian culture and film to Indian.  Indian film, especially non-Bollywood industries, which produce regional language and art cinema, clearly support this view.  The west asian cinema and culture starts with Iran - India should be included, or else, where exactly would you classify Indian cinema when it quite obiously isnt western?  I strongly reccomend either including India in the east asian cinema article, or changing the entire thing back to eastern cinema - because the move seems to be one purely directed at excluding India, rather than one aimed at raising awareness.  I would be glad to write that section if you wish.   +++$+++ I notaced that the old eastern cinema article has been narrowed down into East Asian cinema - but isnt this a kinda unfair exclusion?  Most people would consider India to be part of the east asian cultural block, especially given the closeness of South East Asian culture and film to Indian.  Indian film, especially non-Bollywood industries, which produce regional language and art cinema, clearly support this view.  The west asian cinema and culture starts with Iran - India should be included, or else, where exactly would you classify Indian cinema when it quite obiously isnt western?  I strongly reccomend either including India in the east asian cinema article, or changing the entire thing back to eastern cinema - because the move seems to be one purely directed at excluding India, rather than one aimed at raising awareness.  I would be glad to write that section if you wish.  [[User:Vastu|Vastu]] 05:23, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
13340 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13339 +++$+++ 13339 +++$+++ 2006-05-15 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.147728180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Gram123|Gram]] 14:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
13341 +++$+++ Vastu +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13339 +++$+++ 13340 +++$+++ 2006-05-15 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.147746420E09 +++$+++ My point is perhaps a very tenuous one - but basically, what im trying to say is the geographical boundry is purely a man-made construct - for example, Thailand, a heavily Indicised culture, is part of South East Asia - thus it is both East Asian and South Asian in terms of culture and geography - yet nobody would consider defining Thailand in the same catagory as South Asia - an article on South Asian cinema would not include Thailand, Indonesia, or another South-East Asian country, yet your article on East Asian cinema does include those countries.  The East Asian name of the article is perhaps well defined - but isnt informative, because of this exclusionary paradox - my point is that it is eaither better to define eastern cinema in different terms (I would actually call it eastern cinema or oriental cienma and include South Asia), or be even more strict in the East Asian definition by removing countries of South-East Asia.  India is not a middle eastern country, yet is doomed to be thought of as one, despite the fact that South-East Asia bears more cultural commonality with India than with East Asia, because modern racial profiling, to put it bluntly, classifys India on the basis of the superficial appearance of Indians - non \"Mongoloid\" as some old anthropologists would put it.  Yet what is a human?  We are made of our minds not our bodies - thus when classifying Eastern cinema, should India not be amongst its other Eastern peers?  A counter argument might be that Indian cinema is stylistically different - yet no more stylistically different than Thai cinema from Japanese cinema.  I should point out that above your compared the wiki article on [[East Asia]] and [[South Asia]] - well those very articles illustrate the problem, since the East Asian one infact dosent include Thai and Malay lands..   +++$+++ ::My point is perhaps a very tenuous one - but basically, what im trying to say is the geographical boundry is purely a man-made construct - for example, Thailand, a heavily Indicised culture, is part of South East Asia - thus it is both East Asian and South Asian in terms of culture and geography - yet nobody would consider defining Thailand in the same catagory as South Asia - an article on South Asian cinema would not include Thailand, Indonesia, or another South-East Asian country, yet your article on East Asian cinema does include those countries.  The East Asian name of the article is perhaps well defined - but isnt informative, because of this exclusionary paradox - my point is that it is eaither better to define eastern cinema in different terms (I would actually call it eastern cinema or oriental cienma and include South Asia), or be even more strict in the East Asian definition by removing countries of South-East Asia.  India is not a middle eastern country, yet is doomed to be thought of as one, despite the fact that South-East Asia bears more cultural commonality with India than with East Asia, because modern racial profiling, to put it bluntly, classifys India on the basis of the superficial appearance of Indians - non "Mongoloid" as some old anthropologists would put it.  Yet what is a human?  We are made of our minds not our bodies - thus when classifying Eastern cinema, should India not be amongst its other Eastern peers?  A counter argument might be that Indian cinema is stylistically different - yet no more stylistically different than Thai cinema from Japanese cinema.  I should point out that above your compared the wiki article on [[East Asia]] and [[South Asia]] - well those very articles illustrate the problem, since the East Asian one infact dosent include Thai and Malay lands..  [[User:Vastu|Vastu]] 19:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
13342 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13339 +++$+++ 13341 +++$+++ 2006-05-15 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.147760880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Gram123|Gram]] 23:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

275485 +++$+++ Sjorford +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-06 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.152220860E09 +++$+++ Are you the Fiver-reading Chelsea-supporting conspiracy theorist, then? ;) \u2014  +++$+++ Are you the Fiver-reading Chelsea-supporting conspiracy theorist, then? ;) — [[User:Sjorford|sjorford]][[User talk:Sjorford|++]] 14:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
275486 +++$+++ Sjorford +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275485 +++$+++ 275485 +++$+++ 2006-07-06 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.152224760E09 +++$+++ Good thinking, done. \u2014  +++$+++ :Good thinking, done. — [[User:Sjorford|sjorford]][[User talk:Sjorford|++]] 15:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

13343 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-16 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.147764120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Gram123|Gram]] 00:22, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
13344 +++$+++ Vastu +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13343 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.147787580E09 +++$+++ That seems to be the best solution then - thanks for changing it - I will check the new articles out later, and try to help with their content if I can.   +++$+++ ::::That seems to be the best solution then - thanks for changing it - I will check the new articles out later, and try to help with their content if I can.  [[User:Vastu|Vastu]] 06:53, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

537633 +++$+++ Picaroon9288 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-01 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.167648180E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux. I just came across the article [[Faya-Largeau]], which you moved to that title from [[Faya]] a little <s>over<\/s> (under, it seems) a year ago. [http:\/\/www.britannica.com\/eb\/article-9033859\/Faya Britannica] and the [http:\/\/www.primature-tchad.org\/CIRCONSCRIPTIONS.pdf Chadian government] both say that the current name is actually Faya, <s>so I'll shortly tag Faya (which has been converted into a dab page) with {{tl|Db-g6}}, wait for it to be deleted, and then move [[Faya-Largeau]] there.<\/s> Do you have any objections to this reversal of your move?  +++$+++ Hi Aldux. I just came across the article [[Faya-Largeau]], which you moved to that title from [[Faya]] a little <s>over</s> (under, it seems) a year ago. [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9033859/Faya Britannica] and the [http://www.primature-tchad.org/CIRCONSCRIPTIONS.pdf Chadian government] both say that the current name is actually Faya, <s>so I'll shortly tag Faya (which has been converted into a dab page) with {{tl|Db-g6}}, wait for it to be deleted, and then move [[Faya-Largeau]] there.</s> Do you have any objections to this reversal of your move? [[User talk:Picaroon9288|Picaroon]] 02:43, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
537634 +++$+++ Picaroon9288 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537633 +++$+++ 537633 +++$+++ 2007-01-01 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.167658380E09 +++$+++ Scratch that, WP:CSD is backlogged and this doesn't really fit with CSD G6 anyways, so I'll send the request to WP:RM.  +++$+++ :Scratch that, WP:CSD is backlogged and this doesn't really fit with CSD G6 anyways, so I'll send the request to WP:RM. [[User talk:Picaroon9288|Picaroon]] 05:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
537635 +++$+++ Picaroon9288 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537633 +++$+++ 537634 +++$+++ 2007-01-01 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.167702180E09 +++$+++ Well first of all, I didn't write the Bodele article - my single edit to it was a copyedit. I agree that it is very well written - probably even a bit above what I'm capable of, in fact. (My closest DYK to Chad is [[Bayajidda]], from northern Nigeria - he crossed Chad, but didn't stay. If I've written any Chad articles, they're just geo-stubs or bio-stubs that are so poor I've forgotten them already.) Anyways, because of what you showed me about the naming confusion, I'll withdraw the RM request and leave Faya as a redirect to Faya-Largeau (all incoming links seem to Faya seem to be for the town, not the plant.) Does this sound good? I'm not sure the current dab page, [[Faya (disambiguation)]], is needed at all now, because \"X (disambiguation)\" pages with two entries tend to be pretty useless.  +++$+++ ::Well first of all, I didn't write the Bodele article - my single edit to it was a copyedit. I agree that it is very well written - probably even a bit above what I'm capable of, in fact. (My closest DYK to Chad is [[Bayajidda]], from northern Nigeria - he crossed Chad, but didn't stay. If I've written any Chad articles, they're just geo-stubs or bio-stubs that are so poor I've forgotten them already.) Anyways, because of what you showed me about the naming confusion, I'll withdraw the RM request and leave Faya as a redirect to Faya-Largeau (all incoming links seem to Faya seem to be for the town, not the plant.) Does this sound good? I'm not sure the current dab page, [[Faya (disambiguation)]], is needed at all now, because "X (disambiguation)" pages with two entries tend to be pretty useless. [[User talk:Picaroon9288|Picaroon]] 17:43, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
537636 +++$+++ Picaroon9288 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537633 +++$+++ 537635 +++$+++ 2007-01-01 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.167708660E09 +++$+++ On an unrelated note, I noticed your [[User:Aldux\/Subpage 3|sysop-nationaliy page]]. You might want to add [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer diablo]] to Singapore and  +++$+++ :::On an unrelated note, I noticed your [[User:Aldux/Subpage 3|sysop-nationaliy page]]. You might want to add [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer diablo]] to Singapore and [[User:Redux|Redux]] to Brazil. [[User talk:Picaroon9288|Picaroon]] 19:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
537637 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537633 +++$+++ 537636 +++$+++ 2007-01-01 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.167710100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your awnsers. As for my sysop page, I'm trying to proceed systematically - thay is, first the sysops who's name starts with the A, and so on.-- +++$+++ ::::Thanks for your awnsers. As for my sysop page, I'm trying to proceed systematically - thay is, first the sysops who's name starts with the A, and so on.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 19:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

89606 +++$+++ Bairdso66 +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89606 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-15 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.145096880E09 +++$+++ i would say \"so and so has not done a good job\" would be a critiscism Thanks...-- +++$+++ i would say "so and so has not done a good job" would be a critiscism Thanks...--[[User:Bairdso66|Bairdso66]] 03:28, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
89607 +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89606 +++$+++ 89606 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.145098320E09 +++$+++ I understand what you're saying, but if you read other wikipedia articles devoted to famous individuals who repeatedly make similarly heated comments, such as [[Ann Coulter]] or [[Rush Limbaugh]] (to choose only two), you'll note that the editors of the articles go out of their way to describe their statements as \"opinions\", \"commentary\", \"remarks\", \"criticisms\", etc.  This is an attempt to conform to wikipedia's [[NPOV]] policy.  I think we should attempt to do so in the Baldwin article, also.  Even if you personally believe his admittedly emotion-filled, hyperbolic responses are simply \"attacks\", to note that in a wikipedia article would be editorializing, i.e., inserting your POV into the text.  We should simply leave the controversial quotes in the article and allow the reader to determine if Baldwin's comments are legitimate criticisms or simply \"attacks\". +++$+++ :I understand what you're saying, but if you read other wikipedia articles devoted to famous individuals who repeatedly make similarly heated comments, such as [[Ann Coulter]] or [[Rush Limbaugh]] (to choose only two), you'll note that the editors of the articles go out of their way to describe their statements as "opinions", "commentary", "remarks", "criticisms", etc.  This is an attempt to conform to wikipedia's [[NPOV]] policy.  I think we should attempt to do so in the Baldwin article, also.  Even if you personally believe his admittedly emotion-filled, hyperbolic responses are simply "attacks", to note that in a wikipedia article would be editorializing, i.e., inserting your POV into the text.  We should simply leave the controversial quotes in the article and allow the reader to determine if Baldwin's comments are legitimate criticisms or simply "attacks".[[User:Hal Raglan|Hal Raglan]] 03:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

537638 +++$+++ Kubigula +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-01 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.167720480E09 +++$+++ Thank you for getting involved in this. I stumbled across this article while doing disambiguation link repair, so I thought I would make a bit of an effort to clean it up. I anticipated that I would be trying to convince Sze Cavalry of WP policies on my own, so I was pleasantly surprised when when you showed up. However, I must confess curiousity as to how you came across this (RC patrol? Sysop magic?). Also, please let me know if you think I could have handled this differently or better.-- +++$+++ Thank you for getting involved in this. I stumbled across this article while doing disambiguation link repair, so I thought I would make a bit of an effort to clean it up. I anticipated that I would be trying to convince Sze Cavalry of WP policies on my own, so I was pleasantly surprised when when you showed up. However, I must confess curiousity as to how you came across this (RC patrol? Sysop magic?). Also, please let me know if you think I could have handled this differently or better.--[[User:Kubigula|Kubigula]] <i>([[User talk:Kubigula|talk]])</i> 22:48, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
537639 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537638 +++$+++ 537638 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.167798120E09 +++$+++ Hi Kubigula. The reson I noted it is simply that I have a very vast watchlist, covering almost all Greece-related articles, among other things, only, these are really a lot of articles. As for the way you've handled the matter, I don't have any objections: you noted serious POV and OR problems, and you intervened with civility.-- +++$+++ :Hi Kubigula. The reson I noted it is simply that I have a very vast watchlist, covering almost all Greece-related articles, among other things, only, these are really a lot of articles. As for the way you've handled the matter, I don't have any objections: you noted serious POV and OR problems, and you intervened with civility.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 20:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
537640 +++$+++ Kubigula +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537638 +++$+++ 537639 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.167829080E09 +++$+++ Ah, the long watchlist - I might have guessed. My watchlist seems to grow by a few articles every day. Sze Cavalary seems to be waiting for your input on Cleophis. May I ask if you intend to edit the article more substantially? No pressure - if you have other areas you would prefer to spend your energy on, I will take a stab at reducing the POV and OR.-- +++$+++ ::Ah, the long watchlist - I might have guessed. My watchlist seems to grow by a few articles every day. Sze Cavalary seems to be waiting for your input on Cleophis. May I ask if you intend to edit the article more substantially? No pressure - if you have other areas you would prefer to spend your energy on, I will take a stab at reducing the POV and OR.--[[User:Kubigula|Kubigula]] <i>([[User talk:Kubigula|talk]])</i> 04:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

13352 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13352 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-13 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.184381580E09 +++$+++ Greetings,  +++$+++ Greetings, [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] 19:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
13353 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13352 +++$+++ 13352 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.184613120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pointing that out. I did a special:whatlinkshere\/ on both templates - the former had about 12 links, and the latter only 2. Easiest thing was to amend the links of the 2, so the capitalised \"Template:East Asian Cinema\" can now be deleted. I had a quick look at some of the other similar templates, and they're not standardised (either in capitalisation or in the actual format of the templates), which would probably be a worthwhile task. I'll note it at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films|Films WikiProject]] and see if we can get agreed format.  +++$+++ * Thanks for pointing that out. I did a special:whatlinkshere/ on both templates - the former had about 12 links, and the latter only 2. Easiest thing was to amend the links of the 2, so the capitalised "Template:East Asian Cinema" can now be deleted. I had a quick look at some of the other similar templates, and they're not standardised (either in capitalisation or in the actual format of the templates), which would probably be a worthwhile task. I'll note it at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films|Films WikiProject]] and see if we can get agreed format. [[User:Gram123|Gram123]] 12:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

45916 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Yllosubmarine +++$+++ 45916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-12 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.294883880E09 +++$+++ My hope is for the simple approach.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ My hope is for the simple approach.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 17:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
45917 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Yllosubmarine +++$+++ 45916 +++$+++ 45916 +++$+++ 2011-01-12 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.294890600E09 +++$+++ Sorry if I wasn't clear. My concern was that Opus113 might desire credit. That's clearly not an issue, but as it could be in a future instance, there might be a need to consider appropriate policy.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ :Sorry if I wasn't clear. My concern was that Opus113 might desire credit. That's clearly not an issue, but as it could be in a future instance, there might be a need to consider appropriate policy.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 19:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
45918 +++$+++ Yllosubmarine +++$+++ Yllosubmarine +++$+++ 45916 +++$+++ 45917 +++$+++ 2011-01-12 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.294893960E09 +++$+++ There is no <s>spoon<\/s> policy. ;) <span style=\"font-family:verdana\"> +++$+++ ::There is no <s>spoon</s> policy. ;) <span style="font-family:verdana">[[User:Yllosubmarine|María]] </span><small>([[User talk:Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">habla</span>]] con[[Special:Contributions/Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">migo</span>]])</small> 20:46, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
45919 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Yllosubmarine +++$+++ 45916 +++$+++ 45918 +++$+++ 2011-01-12 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.294894200E09 +++$+++ Burn the witch! Burn her! -- +++$+++ :::Burn the witch! Burn her! --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 20:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
45920 +++$+++ Yllosubmarine +++$+++ Yllosubmarine +++$+++ 45916 +++$+++ 45919 +++$+++ 2011-01-12 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.294894620E09 +++$+++ Careful, I'll turn you into a newt. <span style=\"font-family:verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::Careful, I'll turn you into a newt. <span style="font-family:verdana">[[User:Yllosubmarine|María]] </span><small>([[User talk:Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">habla</span>]] con[[Special:Contributions/Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">migo</span>]])</small> 20:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

537642 +++$+++ RHaworth +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.168137840E09 +++$+++ Protecting ones talk page is contrary to the spirit of Wikipedia. Please reconsider. --  +++$+++ Protecting ones talk page is contrary to the spirit of Wikipedia. Please reconsider. -- [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] 18:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
537643 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537642 +++$+++ 537642 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.168158960E09 +++$+++ I would love to, believe me; unfortunately a sockpuppetering banned troll has insistently vandalized in a particularly irritating way the user and talk pages of those users that revert his edits and have brought to his banning, forcing me to semiprotect this talk, and he's still doing it with those who haven't wanted semiprotected their pages. So sorry, but till Kaltsef insists, I'll keep it semiprotected.-- +++$+++ :I would love to, believe me; unfortunately a sockpuppetering banned troll has insistently vandalized in a particularly irritating way the user and talk pages of those users that revert his edits and have brought to his banning, forcing me to semiprotect this talk, and he's still doing it with those who haven't wanted semiprotected their pages. So sorry, but till Kaltsef insists, I'll keep it semiprotected.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 00:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

275499 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-21 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.158885120E09 +++$+++ There you go again. The irony of telling me to mind my own business whilst continually leaving messages for me or vandalising my user or talk pages seems to be lost on you.  +++$+++ There you go again. The irony of telling me to mind my own business whilst continually leaving messages for me or vandalising my user or talk pages seems to be lost on you. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 17:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
275500 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275499 +++$+++ 275499 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.158885780E09 +++$+++ Wise words. Perhaps you should bear them in mind the next time you make a contribution to Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :Wise words. Perhaps you should bear them in mind the next time you make a contribution to Wikipedia. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 17:43, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
275501 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275499 +++$+++ 275499 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.158886500E09 +++$+++ So I have no authority and am not the chief ed, but you have the authority to give me chances. Are you the chief ed?  +++$+++ :So I have no authority and am not the chief ed, but you have the authority to give me chances. Are you the chief ed? [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 17:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
275502 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275499 +++$+++ 275499 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.158887280E09 +++$+++ I'm in good company then!!!  +++$+++ :I'm in good company then!!! [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 18:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

13356 +++$+++ Kylohk +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-23 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.185222360E09 +++$+++ Hello, I noticed that you've changed all \"rigour\" into \"rigor\" in editing the Jackie Chan article. Please note that the former spelling is the British spelling version, and is recommended since the subject is from Hong Kong, which uses British English. (Hence the spelling should be consistently British)-- +++$+++ Hello, I noticed that you've changed all "rigour" into "rigor" in editing the Jackie Chan article. Please note that the former spelling is the British spelling version, and is recommended since the subject is from Hong Kong, which uses British English. (Hence the spelling should be consistently British)--[[User:Kylohk|Kylohk]] 13:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
13357 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13356 +++$+++ 13356 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.185223080E09 +++$+++ Hi Kylohk. I'm British myself. The English spelling of \"rigour\" does indeed have a \"u\" in it, but we drop the \"u\" in \"rigorous\" and \"rigorously\". I was sure I was right, but then you undid the edit, so this time I spell-checked with a UK English dictionary and also searched Dictionary.com for \"rigourously\" (no entries). So I'm afraid it's your spelling at fault this time! Keep up the good work.  +++$+++ * Hi Kylohk. I'm British myself. The English spelling of "rigour" does indeed have a "u" in it, but we drop the "u" in "rigorous" and "rigorously". I was sure I was right, but then you undid the edit, so this time I spell-checked with a UK English dictionary and also searched Dictionary.com for "rigourously" (no entries). So I'm afraid it's your spelling at fault this time! Keep up the good work. [[User:Gram123|Gram123]] 13:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

537646 +++$+++ Jakiša Tomić +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537646 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-08 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.168291380E09 +++$+++ You have done some reverts on my talk page once. Don't do that again. Thanks.  +++$+++ You have done some reverts on my talk page once. Don't do that again. Thanks. [[User:Jakiša Tomić|Jakiša Tomić]] 13:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
537647 +++$+++ Jakiša Tomić +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537646 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.168292340E09 +++$+++ Oh, and you are admin!?!? Just great!  +++$+++ ::Oh, and you are admin!?!? Just great! [[User:Jakiša Tomić|Jakiša Tomić]] 13:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
537648 +++$+++ Jakiša Tomić +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537646 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.168302420E09 +++$+++ \"All rollback edits are signed as minor\"? Are you joking or are you think I am stupid? I don't care about Julije Klovi\u0107, Giulio Clovio, you, that user who asked me to vote, that Italian user, Fidel Castro, Jesus Christ, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler and all other nationalists on Wikipedia. Just leave me alone. +++$+++ :::"All rollback edits are signed as minor"? Are you joking or are you think I am stupid? I don't care about Julije Klović, Giulio Clovio, you, that user who asked me to vote, that Italian user, Fidel Castro, Jesus Christ, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler and all other nationalists on Wikipedia. Just leave me alone.[[User:Jakiša Tomić|Jakiša Tomić]] 16:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

570205 +++$+++ Mr_Senseless +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-12 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.208039580E09 +++$+++ ''' +++$+++ '''[[User:Mr Senseless|Mister Senseless]]&trade;''' ([[User_talk:Mr Senseless|Speak]] - [[Special:Contributions/Mr_Senseless|Contributions]]) 15:33, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
570206 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570205 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.208041800E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 16:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
570207 +++$+++ Keeper76 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570205 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.208041980E09 +++$+++ I've just commented on the Noticeboard about this, posting friendly advice that everyone needs to move past this.  It was a good faith nom, and good faith Wikiproject post, the AfD is done, and everyone needs to go back to business.  I also came here to say, David, that I found your tone\/language to be a bit harsh for a moderator of a dispute.  Admins are exactly that, moderators.  A lot of hurt feelings could be avoided with gentler language.  Flies\/honey\/vinegar.  Just some friendly advice.  [[User:Keeper76|<font color=\"#21421E\" face=\"comic sans ms\">Keeper<\/font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color=\"#CC7722\" face=\"Papyrus\">76<\/font>]]  |   +++$+++ :::I've just commented on the Noticeboard about this, posting friendly advice that everyone needs to move past this.  It was a good faith nom, and good faith Wikiproject post, the AfD is done, and everyone needs to go back to business.  I also came here to say, David, that I found your tone/language to be a bit harsh for a moderator of a dispute.  Admins are exactly that, moderators.  A lot of hurt feelings could be avoided with gentler language.  Flies/honey/vinegar.  Just some friendly advice.  [[User:Keeper76|<font color="#21421E" face="comic sans ms">Keeper</font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">76</font>]]  |  [[User:Keeper76#Origins of My Username|<font color="#ff0000"><small>Disclaimer</small></font>]] 16:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
570208 +++$+++ Mr_Senseless +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570205 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.208088300E09 +++$+++ I've read both those documents some months ago. I more or less completely agree with [[WP:INSPECTOR]], but its not relevant to the article in question. \"Building inspector\" deals with articles lacking ''content,'' and argues that they should be marked as stubs, this was an example of an article initially not asserting notability, violating [[WP:N]], which is a valid reason for deletion. I can't completely say the same for [[WP:CHANCE]], on one hand yes articles need to have a chance to grow, we're here to build content, and in questionable cases that's what the watchlist, and <nowiki>{{sources}}, {{notability}}, and {{unsourced}}<\/nowiki> are for, but on the other hand there are times (above and beyond obvious CSD candidates) when (IMO) it is very appropriate to PROD or take to AfD an article soon after its creation, among those are likely vanity pages. Unfortunately, this turned out not to be a clear-cut case, my quick Google News search didn't turn up with anything, but the sources proving notability came through in part because of the AfD process. A good faith nom is never POV or disruption. Also important to note are that [[WP:INSPECTOR]] and [[WP:CHANCE]] are ''essays'', opinions of the author that wrote them, and <u>not<\/u> policies. I personally think that if a web search doesn't turn anything up, being required to sit on a vanity page for a week is absurd, especially if it is a clear-cut case. Speedy delete? No, but the PROD and AFD processes allow for the community to comment and form consensus as a check and balance. If sources are found and notability is proven, great, withdraw the AfD and move on! ''' +++$+++ ::::I've read both those documents some months ago. I more or less completely agree with [[WP:INSPECTOR]], but its not relevant to the article in question. "Building inspector" deals with articles lacking ''content,'' and argues that they should be marked as stubs, this was an example of an article initially not asserting notability, violating [[WP:N]], which is a valid reason for deletion. I can't completely say the same for [[WP:CHANCE]], on one hand yes articles need to have a chance to grow, we're here to build content, and in questionable cases that's what the watchlist, and <nowiki>{{sources}}, {{notability}}, and {{unsourced}}</nowiki> are for, but on the other hand there are times (above and beyond obvious CSD candidates) when (IMO) it is very appropriate to PROD or take to AfD an article soon after its creation, among those are likely vanity pages. Unfortunately, this turned out not to be a clear-cut case, my quick Google News search didn't turn up with anything, but the sources proving notability came through in part because of the AfD process. A good faith nom is never POV or disruption. Also important to note are that [[WP:INSPECTOR]] and [[WP:CHANCE]] are ''essays'', opinions of the author that wrote them, and <u>not</u> policies. I personally think that if a web search doesn't turn anything up, being required to sit on a vanity page for a week is absurd, especially if it is a clear-cut case. Speedy delete? No, but the PROD and AFD processes allow for the community to comment and form consensus as a check and balance. If sources are found and notability is proven, great, withdraw the AfD and move on! '''[[User:Mr Senseless|Mister Senseless]]&trade;''' ([[User_talk:Mr Senseless|Speak]] - [[Special:Contributions/Mr_Senseless|Contributions]]) 05:05, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

537649 +++$+++ Andrwsc +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-10 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.168473660E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux, I realize (as you did) that [[User:Asteraki|Asteraki]]'s edits to those articles were not normal procedure, but to be honest, the end results ''were'' correct. Take a look at [[:Category:Republic of Macedonia at the Olympics]]. The 2004 article is the only one that doesn't follow the naming conventions we have agreed upon in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Sports Olympics]]. I wanted to rename that page previously but could not because of previous moves. As you are an admin, could you please move that article to achieve the same result? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Aldux, I realize (as you did) that [[User:Asteraki|Asteraki]]'s edits to those articles were not normal procedure, but to be honest, the end results ''were'' correct. Take a look at [[:Category:Republic of Macedonia at the Olympics]]. The 2004 article is the only one that doesn't follow the naming conventions we have agreed upon in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Sports Olympics]]. I wanted to rename that page previously but could not because of previous moves. As you are an admin, could you please move that article to achieve the same result? Thanks, [[User:Andrwsc|Andrwsc]] 16:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
537650 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537649 +++$+++ 537649 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.168476960E09 +++$+++ I see. Following your request I've moved the page to the correct location, preserving the page history. Ciao, -- +++$+++ :I see. Following your request I've moved the page to the correct location, preserving the page history. Ciao, --[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
537651 +++$+++ Andrwsc +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537649 +++$+++ 537650 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.168477920E09 +++$+++ Thanks, much appreciated! I had been planning to post a request on the \"requested moves\" page but this speeds up that process.  +++$+++ ::Thanks, much appreciated! I had been planning to post a request on the "requested moves" page but this speeds up that process. [[User:Andrwsc|Andrwsc]] 17:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

52819 +++$+++ SimonTrew +++$+++ Shakescene +++$+++ 52819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-06 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.244317680E09 +++$+++ shakes can you gi tve me a hand with this i really didn't know which way to go. the measures were so ridiculous i had assumed they were done clumsily from imperial (or us customary) into metric i added all the convert templates etc and back translated into imperial. As i said on mosnum i was not entirely happy with it though i think nicer now in tabes and stuff. On a larger subject i think recipes really suffer from the numbering system here but i am not sure what to do about that and am still not sure what to do about that, what to suggest. if you have any ideas pleas contact me either on MOSNUM or on my personal talk  +++$+++ shakes can you gi tve me a hand with this i really didn't know which way to go. the measures were so ridiculous i had assumed they were done clumsily from imperial (or us customary) into metric i added all the convert templates etc and back translated into imperial. As i said on mosnum i was not entirely happy with it though i think nicer now in tabes and stuff. On a larger subject i think recipes really suffer from the numbering system here but i am not sure what to do about that and am still not sure what to do about that, what to suggest. if you have any ideas pleas contact me either on MOSNUM or on my personal talk [[User:SimonTrew|SimonTrew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 12:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
52820 +++$+++ SimonTrew +++$+++ Shakescene +++$+++ 52819 +++$+++ 52819 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.244369460E09 +++$+++ shakes everything you said i agree with and makes sense. i made my best effort to make the measures sensible. i will go through history and ask your advice again if i may.  +++$+++ :shakes everything you said i agree with and makes sense. i made my best effort to make the measures sensible. i will go through history and ask your advice again if i may. [[User:SimonTrew|SimonTrew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 03:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
52821 +++$+++ SimonTrew +++$+++ Shakescene +++$+++ 52819 +++$+++ 52819 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.244370000E09 +++$+++ btw perhaps i should say for want of doubt this is a very minor article for me. I deliberately picked one that i have subbed and has lots of converts etc but it's not the end of the earth.  +++$+++ :btw perhaps i should say for want of doubt this is a very minor article for me. I deliberately picked one that i have subbed and has lots of converts etc but it's not the end of the earth. [[User:SimonTrew|SimonTrew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 03:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
52822 +++$+++ SimonTrew +++$+++ Shakescene +++$+++ 52819 +++$+++ 52821 +++$+++ 2009-06-09 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.244587440E09 +++$+++ thanks i read your talk on my page i think you are better off doing it than i would be. btw i have madwe a decision that capitals on i are awaste of time i know i wont win this one but will fight my own battle. best wishes  +++$+++ ::thanks i read your talk on my page i think you are better off doing it than i would be. btw i have madwe a decision that capitals on i are awaste of time i know i wont win this one but will fight my own battle. best wishes [[User:SimonTrew|SimonTrew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 15:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

13364 +++$+++ MickMacNee +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-31 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.201785180E09 +++$+++ [[The Entertainers (NUFC)]] is up for [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/The Entertainers (NUFC)|Afd]] [[User:MickMacNee|MickMacNee]] ([[User talk:MickMacNee|talk]]) 05:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)  +++$+++ [[The Entertainers (NUFC)]] is up for [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Entertainers (NUFC)|Afd]] [[User:MickMacNee|MickMacNee]] ([[User talk:MickMacNee|talk]]) 05:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC) [[User:MickMacNee|MickMacNee]] ([[User talk:MickMacNee|talk]]) 05:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
13365 +++$+++ WurmWoode +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13364 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 07:19:00 +++$+++ 1.203002340E09 +++$+++ '''<span style=\"background:#e0e0f0;\"> +++$+++ ::'''<span style="background:#e0e0f0;">[[User:WurmWoode|<span style="color:#000000;">''WurmWoode''</span>]][[User talk:WurmWoode|<span style="color:#00b000;"><sup>T</sup></span>]]</span>''' 07:19, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

537653 +++$+++ Yannismarou +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.168666320E09 +++$+++ I don't know how should I organize the whole thing. Make a draft page somewhere with the nominations, the questions, the answers etc, and when I'am ready submit it officially? How does this thing work? In any case, I'd be happy if you, Nicos and Rob, namely you who made the proposal and the two other users who commented on it (and with whom I have shared some of the most vivid and creative moments in Wikipedia), could co-nominate me. I would be really honored. Maybe we can prepare the nominatios, then work the (obligatory - if understand how RfA works) questions-answers, and Monday-Tuesday - if I feel everything is ready - submit it. I do not want to hurry; what matters to me is to make the things properly and try to be accurate and well-prepared for the whole proceedure. I wait for your comments. Regards!-- +++$+++ I don't know how should I organize the whole thing. Make a draft page somewhere with the nominations, the questions, the answers etc, and when I'am ready submit it officially? How does this thing work? In any case, I'd be happy if you, Nicos and Rob, namely you who made the proposal and the two other users who commented on it (and with whom I have shared some of the most vivid and creative moments in Wikipedia), could co-nominate me. I would be really honored. Maybe we can prepare the nominatios, then work the (obligatory - if understand how RfA works) questions-answers, and Monday-Tuesday - if I feel everything is ready - submit it. I do not want to hurry; what matters to me is to make the things properly and try to be accurate and well-prepared for the whole proceedure. I wait for your comments. Regards!--[[User:Yannismarou|Yannismarou]] 21:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
537654 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537653 +++$+++ 537653 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.168668240E09 +++$+++ Hey, good! Go for it! That way you will be able block me next time I remove Greek poems from my userpage... :-) As for the process, what I did myself was to prepare most of my answers offline. But of course you can also create a page. If you like you can create it right away in the WP:RFA\/... namespace; other people will be supposed to leave it alone until you actually list it at the main WP:RFA page. - Just one thing, about co-nominators, I remember some discussion on RFA talk some time ago where it turned out some people find multiple co-noms annoying. So maybe it's better to get a single person to do the nomination but prepare it well. Of course, Aldux is quite good at these things... :-)  +++$+++ :Hey, good! Go for it! That way you will be able block me next time I remove Greek poems from my userpage... :-) As for the process, what I did myself was to prepare most of my answers offline. But of course you can also create a page. If you like you can create it right away in the WP:RFA/... namespace; other people will be supposed to leave it alone until you actually list it at the main WP:RFA page. - Just one thing, about co-nominators, I remember some discussion on RFA talk some time ago where it turned out some people find multiple co-noms annoying. So maybe it's better to get a single person to do the nomination but prepare it well. Of course, Aldux is quite good at these things... :-) [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 22:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
537655 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537653 +++$+++ 537654 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.168669200E09 +++$+++ Aye to all that. Off-line, one-nom, not-me!  +++$+++ ::Aye to all that. Off-line, one-nom, not-me! [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 22:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
537656 +++$+++ Yannismarou +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537653 +++$+++ 537655 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.168722600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the advice!-- +++$+++ :::Thanks for the advice!--[[User:Yannismarou|Yannismarou]] 13:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
537657 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537653 +++$+++ 537656 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.168742460E09 +++$+++ This is fantastic!!!!! :-) Don't worry, I hadn't forgotten, I was keeping my fingers crossed, it's great to hear you accepted. And thanks to FPS for his compliments, even if I'm not sure I really deserve them. ;-)-- +++$+++ ::::This is fantastic!!!!! :-) Don't worry, I hadn't forgotten, I was keeping my fingers crossed, it's great to hear you accepted. And thanks to FPS for his compliments, even if I'm not sure I really deserve them. ;-)--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 18:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
537658 +++$+++ Yannismarou +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537653 +++$+++ 537657 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.168792860E09 +++$+++ From words to action I see! Thanks! Just give me 1-3 days to work the answers.-- +++$+++ :::::From words to action I see! Thanks! Just give me 1-3 days to work the answers.--[[User:Yannismarou|Yannismarou]] 08:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

13368 +++$+++ Johnnyauau2000 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-14 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.210834620E09 +++$+++ I've seen your edits in history on both articles and it helps very well. How would you like if you can help me turn those articles into something interesting to read about. Right now, I couldn't do it alone although I did my best by introducing Hong Kong Legends and added another version in The Protector to make it more interesting to read. I would be happy if you can help 'cause right now it's near impossible to find materials from various websites that I can add to make it worth it if someone decides to research for their homework for example. Answer me in my talk page if you're willing to help.  +++$+++ I've seen your edits in history on both articles and it helps very well. How would you like if you can help me turn those articles into something interesting to read about. Right now, I couldn't do it alone although I did my best by introducing Hong Kong Legends and added another version in The Protector to make it more interesting to read. I would be happy if you can help 'cause right now it's near impossible to find materials from various websites that I can add to make it worth it if someone decides to research for their homework for example. Answer me in my talk page if you're willing to help. [[User:Johnnyauau2000|Johnnyauau2000]] ([[User talk:Johnnyauau2000|talk]]) 23:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
13369 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13368 +++$+++ 13368 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.213645080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ : [[User:Gram123|Gram123]] ([[User talk:Gram123#top|talk]]) 12:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
13370 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13368 +++$+++ 13369 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.213739460E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Gram123|Gram123]] ([[User talk:Gram123#top|talk]]) 14:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

264372 +++$+++ Kevin Murray +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264372 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-20 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.192944060E09 +++$+++ Hi.  If the article is proposed for GA review, I can see no reason to prejudice it with a tag.  Although I personally don't like the style of the article, it seems to be within the de facto standards.  It would be intersting what comments you get from the GA review.  I think we should allow you to go forward and then revisit the issue after the GA review.  Good Luck!  I'll pull the tag. -- +++$+++ Hi.  If the article is proposed for GA review, I can see no reason to prejudice it with a tag.  Although I personally don't like the style of the article, it seems to be within the de facto standards.  It would be intersting what comments you get from the GA review.  I think we should allow you to go forward and then revisit the issue after the GA review.  Good Luck!  I'll pull the tag. --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] 22:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
264373 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264372 +++$+++ 264372 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.192945140E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Kevin.  +++$+++ :Thanks, Kevin. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

537659 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.168923480E09 +++$+++ Are you online right now? <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ Are you online right now? <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 20:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
537660 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537659 +++$+++ 537659 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.168923960E09 +++$+++ Hi Khoi :-) All OK?-- +++$+++ :Hi Khoi :-) All OK?--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

537661 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537661 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.168924260E09 +++$+++ [[image:SFriendly.gif|18px]] Could you please semi-protect [[I\u011fd\u0131r Province]], and possibly fully protect [[Turkification]]? <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ [[image:SFriendly.gif|18px]] Could you please semi-protect [[Iğdır Province]], and possibly fully protect [[Turkification]]? <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 21:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
537662 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537661 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.168925880E09 +++$+++ Grazie molto. <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :::Grazie molto. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 21:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

537663 +++$+++ Duja +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537663 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-16 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.168977180E09 +++$+++ I'm posting this same message to {{user|Asterion}} (regarding Spanish), so please check the edit history if he did his part before you... and watch for edit conflicts :-).  +++$+++ I'm posting this same message to {{user|Asterion}} (regarding Spanish), so please check the edit history if he did his part before you... and watch for edit conflicts :-). [[User:Duja|Duja]]<span style="font-size:70%;">[[User talk:Duja|►]]</span> 11:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
537664 +++$+++ Duja +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537663 +++$+++ 537663 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.169068980E09 +++$+++ Grazie!  +++$+++ :Grazie! [[User:Duja|Duja]]<span style="font-size:70%;">[[User talk:Duja|►]]</span> 13:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

13376 +++$+++  +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13376 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-04 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.231089720E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 09:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
13377 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13376 +++$+++ 13376 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.231280400E09 +++$+++ This image was replaced by a better one, so this can be deleted.  +++$+++ * This image was replaced by a better one, so this can be deleted. [[User:Gram123|Gram123]] ([[User talk:Gram123#top|talk]]) 14:20, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

537666 +++$+++ Andrwsc +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-17 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.169037060E09 +++$+++ Hi again Aldux, I have another move request. Can you move [[:Hong Kong, China at the 2004 Summer Olympics]] to simply [[:Hong Kong at the 2004 Summer Olympics]]? It's a similar situation to the FYR Macedonia page you fixed for us a few days ago.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi again Aldux, I have another move request. Can you move [[:Hong Kong, China at the 2004 Summer Olympics]] to simply [[:Hong Kong at the 2004 Summer Olympics]]? It's a similar situation to the FYR Macedonia page you fixed for us a few days ago.  Thanks, [[User:Andrwsc|Andrwsc]] 04:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
537667 +++$+++ Andrwsc +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537666 +++$+++ 537666 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.169080020E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Andrwsc|Andrwsc]] 16:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

275523 +++$+++ Goochelaar +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-01 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.172820720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reverting vandalism in my page. It is greatly appreciated! -- +++$+++ Thanks for reverting vandalism in my page. It is greatly appreciated! --[[User:Goochelaar|Goochelaar]] 23:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
275524 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275523 +++$+++ 275523 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.172889480E09 +++$+++ PS. You need to brush up on your spelling, mate. You don't spell twit with an a.  +++$+++ :PS. You need to brush up on your spelling, mate. You don't spell twit with an a. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 18:38, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
275525 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.172918040E09 +++$+++ Join the queue.  +++$+++ :::Join the queue. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 02:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

537668 +++$+++ PHG +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537668 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-17 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.169088060E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux. Thank you very much for your message and your intervention. You are totally right, although no incivility was intended. I guess I reacted quite straightforwardly to some obvious patterns of deception. Best regards.  +++$+++ Hi Aldux. Thank you very much for your message and your intervention. You are totally right, although no incivility was intended. I guess I reacted quite straightforwardly to some obvious patterns of deception. Best regards. [[User:PHG|PHG]] 18:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
537669 +++$+++ Constantzeanu +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537668 +++$+++ 537668 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.169098500E09 +++$+++ Hi. I explained the reasons for the move of the [[Vlachs of Serbia]] article to that of [[Timok Vlachs]]. The article currently, deals with the vlachs of the Timok valley in both Bulgaria and Serbia. +++$+++ :Hi. I explained the reasons for the move of the [[Vlachs of Serbia]] article to that of [[Timok Vlachs]]. The article currently, deals with the vlachs of the Timok valley in both Bulgaria and Serbia.[[User:Constantzeanu|Dapiks]] 21:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
537670 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537668 +++$+++ 537669 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.169098980E09 +++$+++ Ciao Dapiks. I'm not objecting to the idea behing the move (that I personally find quite reasonable) but to the modalities; by using copy-and-paste you completely destroy the history of the article, and I can't consent to this. As I said in the edit summary, use [[WP:RM]]; this way, if the request passes, an admin will proceed to make the move correctly. I hope you haven't moved other articles in this way before; if you have please tell me which, so that I can restore the articles' histories.-- +++$+++ ::Ciao Dapiks. I'm not objecting to the idea behing the move (that I personally find quite reasonable) but to the modalities; by using copy-and-paste you completely destroy the history of the article, and I can't consent to this. As I said in the edit summary, use [[WP:RM]]; this way, if the request passes, an admin will proceed to make the move correctly. I hope you haven't moved other articles in this way before; if you have please tell me which, so that I can restore the articles' histories.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
537671 +++$+++ Constantzeanu +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537668 +++$+++ 537670 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.169099700E09 +++$+++ Hi, I put in a request like you suggested. I do not think that there are other articles that I have moved this way before. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::: Hi, I put in a request like you suggested. I do not think that there are other articles that I have moved this way before. Cheers. [[User:Constantzeanu|Dapiks]] 21:55, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
537672 +++$+++ C0gnate +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537668 +++$+++ 537669 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.169116200E09 +++$+++ The title 'Timok Vlachs' is inappropriate. Contrary to what user Constantzeanu \/ Dapiks wrote above, the article does not deal with the Vlachs of Bulgaria. It only mentions them briefly. The title 'Vlachs of Serbia' or even better 'Vlachs of North-Eastern Serbia' is correct, because that is where they live. It is true that in Romania 'Timok Vlachs' or even more frequently 'Timok Romanians' is the preferred term for these people. But the Vlachs themselves disapprove of this term, regarding it as geographically too narrow.  +++$+++ ::The title 'Timok Vlachs' is inappropriate. Contrary to what user Constantzeanu / Dapiks wrote above, the article does not deal with the Vlachs of Bulgaria. It only mentions them briefly. The title 'Vlachs of Serbia' or even better 'Vlachs of North-Eastern Serbia' is correct, because that is where they live. It is true that in Romania 'Timok Vlachs' or even more frequently 'Timok Romanians' is the preferred term for these people. But the Vlachs themselves disapprove of this term, regarding it as geographically too narrow. [[User:C0gnate|C0gnate]] 02:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

275526 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-17 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.174195440E09 +++$+++ Why does a paragraph about [[Rob Hulse]] breaking his ankle belong on the [[Petr \u010cech]] page?  +++$+++ Why does a paragraph about [[Rob Hulse]] breaking his ankle belong on the [[Petr Čech]] page? [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 22:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
275527 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275526 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-17 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.174196760E09 +++$+++ I did delete it with a reason, the reason being that, imo, it is non-notable. [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not a news service]].  +++$+++ ::I did delete it with a reason, the reason being that, imo, it is non-notable. [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not a news service]]. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 22:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

515099 +++$+++ TruthIIPower +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515099 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-27 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.240901700E09 +++$+++ You offered your assistance.  I'm going to take you up on your offer, if it still holds.  Our buddy, Shrandit, is engaging in an edit war to preserve what I consider a highly non-neutral version of [[Abortion and religion]], while sandbagging discussion with incivility.   His only supporter is the blatantly \"pro-life\" partisan, Ferrylodge.  Moreover, I was informed by an interested third party that Shrandit is quite likely trying to trick me into either being uncivil or tripping over the 3rd reversion rail, with the goal of getting me blocked and smearing my reputation.  Rather than sink to his level, or if my source is right, fall into his trap, I'm coming to you to ask for mediation. Please show me that Wikipedia is indeed the last bastion of truth, neutrality and justice for all.  +++$+++ You offered your assistance.  I'm going to take you up on your offer, if it still holds.  Our buddy, Shrandit, is engaging in an edit war to preserve what I consider a highly non-neutral version of [[Abortion and religion]], while sandbagging discussion with incivility.   His only supporter is the blatantly "pro-life" partisan, Ferrylodge.  Moreover, I was informed by an interested third party that Shrandit is quite likely trying to trick me into either being uncivil or tripping over the 3rd reversion rail, with the goal of getting me blocked and smearing my reputation.  Rather than sink to his level, or if my source is right, fall into his trap, I'm coming to you to ask for mediation. Please show me that Wikipedia is indeed the last bastion of truth, neutrality and justice for all. [[User:TruthIIPower|TruthIIPower]] ([[User talk:TruthIIPower|talk]]) 23:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
515100 +++$+++ Schrandit +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515099 +++$+++ 515099 +++$+++ 2009-04-28 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.240903860E09 +++$+++ \"I was informed by an interested third party that Shrandit is quite likely trying to trick me into either being uncivil or tripping over the 3rd reversion rail, with the goal of getting me blocked and smearing my reputation.\" And who said that? -  +++$+++ :"I was informed by an interested third party that Shrandit is quite likely trying to trick me into either being uncivil or tripping over the 3rd reversion rail, with the goal of getting me blocked and smearing my reputation." And who said that? - [[User:Schrandit|Schrandit]] ([[User talk:Schrandit|talk]]) 00:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
515101 +++$+++ TruthIIPower +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515099 +++$+++ 515100 +++$+++ 2009-04-28 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.240904580E09 +++$+++ No, the real question is whether it's true.  It sure does look like your insults were bait.  And I wasn't even aware of this reversion magic number rule, so I would have totally shot myself in the foot.  +++$+++ ::No, the real question is whether it's true.  It sure does look like your insults were bait.  And I wasn't even aware of this reversion magic number rule, so I would have totally shot myself in the foot. [[User:TruthIIPower|TruthIIPower]] ([[User talk:TruthIIPower|talk]]) 00:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
515102 +++$+++ Schrandit +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515099 +++$+++ 515101 +++$+++ 2009-04-28 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.240904820E09 +++$+++ Thats curious, I know a user who would have given that same answer. -  +++$+++ :::Thats curious, I know a user who would have given that same answer. - [[User:Schrandit|Schrandit]] ([[User talk:Schrandit|talk]]) 00:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

537674 +++$+++ Orpheus +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-25 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.169794860E09 +++$+++ The user that's been disrupting Hindu-related articles, [[User:Maleabroad|Maleabroad]] seems to have registered a different account: {{vandal|Brownguy20}}. I posted it to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#User:Maleabroad|AN\/I]]. He also seems to have left you a message in a similar vein, two posts up. Thanks,  +++$+++ The user that's been disrupting Hindu-related articles, [[User:Maleabroad|Maleabroad]] seems to have registered a different account: {{vandal|Brownguy20}}. I posted it to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Maleabroad|AN/I]]. He also seems to have left you a message in a similar vein, two posts up. Thanks, [[User:Orpheus|Orpheus]] 23:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
537675 +++$+++ Baristarim +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537674 +++$+++ 537674 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.170126120E09 +++$+++ Can you move it back to [[Aksu River]]? Over time more info has been added about the modern river as you had asked here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Cestrus_River&diff=prev&oldid=94059911]. I cannot do the move for some reason therefore I wanted to see if you could do it. Cheers!  +++$+++ *Can you move it back to [[Aksu River]]? Over time more info has been added about the modern river as you had asked here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cestrus_River&diff=prev&oldid=94059911]. I cannot do the move for some reason therefore I wanted to see if you could do it. Cheers! [[User:Baristarim|Baristarim]] 19:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
537676 +++$+++ Bejnar +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537674 +++$+++ 537674 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.170127860E09 +++$+++ Please don't move the river. There is another river is Kazachstan with the same name, so that is why there is now a disambiguation page at [[Aksu River]]. -- +++$+++ *Please don't move the river. There is another river is Kazachstan with the same name, so that is why there is now a disambiguation page at [[Aksu River]]. --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] 19:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
537677 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537674 +++$+++ 537676 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.170131520E09 +++$+++ I see. Well Barristarim, Bejnar has a point, but you can always move it to [[Aksu River (Turkey)]] or [[Aksu River, Turkey]].-- +++$+++ ::I see. Well Barristarim, Bejnar has a point, but you can always move it to [[Aksu River (Turkey)]] or [[Aksu River, Turkey]].--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 20:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

275531 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-02 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.178163540E09 +++$+++ I redirected it because the other page doesn't exist, not because I hate Chelsea :) ''' +++$+++ I redirected it because the other page doesn't exist, not because I hate Chelsea :) '''[[User:Sceptre|Will]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|is it can be time for messages now plz?]])</sup> 20:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
275532 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275531 +++$+++ 275531 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.178164620E09 +++$+++ Watching the match at home was hilarious - me, and me mum cheered when Kuyt \"scored\" last night (I'm a 'pool fan), and my dad cheered when it was disallowed (as he had had a bet on Chelsea). Good game, though. ''' +++$+++ :Watching the match at home was hilarious - me, and me mum cheered when Kuyt "scored" last night (I'm a 'pool fan), and my dad cheered when it was disallowed (as he had had a bet on Chelsea). Good game, though. '''[[User:Sceptre|Will]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|is it can be time for messages now plz?]])</sup> 20:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
275533 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275531 +++$+++ 275532 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.178165700E09 +++$+++ I'm not going to disrespect Chelsea either - they are a good team, but I think that Liverpool are just good with penalties (which I hope the final won't go to. Deja vu...) ''' +++$+++ ::I'm not going to disrespect Chelsea either - they are a good team, but I think that Liverpool are just good with penalties (which I hope the final won't go to. Deja vu...) '''[[User:Sceptre|Will]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|is it can be time for messages now plz?]])</sup> 21:15, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
275534 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275531 +++$+++ 275533 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.178166420E09 +++$+++ Of course, [[Ken Barlow|Ken]] and [[Deirdre Barlow|Deirdre]] would have to get married, so would [[Prince Charles]], and [[Pope Benedict XVI|the Pope]] has to die. Then Liverpool have it in the bag :P ''' +++$+++ :::Of course, [[Ken Barlow|Ken]] and [[Deirdre Barlow|Deirdre]] would have to get married, so would [[Prince Charles]], and [[Pope Benedict XVI|the Pope]] has to die. Then Liverpool have it in the bag :P '''[[User:Sceptre|Will]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|is it can be time for messages now plz?]])</sup> 21:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
275535 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275531 +++$+++ 275534 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.178167260E09 +++$+++ The odds of that happening are worse than Arsenal winning the Champions League. And that's saying something. ''' +++$+++ ::::The odds of that happening are worse than Arsenal winning the Champions League. And that's saying something. '''[[User:Sceptre|Will]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|is it can be time for messages now plz?]])</sup> 21:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
275536 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275531 +++$+++ 275535 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.178167440E09 +++$+++ I think Chelsea have beaten Liverpool in a semi final - not a Champions League one, but a recent semi nonetheless. ''' +++$+++ :::::I think Chelsea have beaten Liverpool in a semi final - not a Champions League one, but a recent semi nonetheless. '''[[User:Sceptre|Will]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|is it can be time for messages now plz?]])</sup> 21:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

570210 +++$+++ David Levy +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-13 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.208070000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for catching my accidental inclusion of useless code!  My previous attempt was an even worse misstep (as it would have generated nonsensical dates during the last week of every month).  I'm glad that I realized that in time.  :-)  \u2014 +++$+++ Thanks for catching my accidental inclusion of useless code!  My previous attempt was an even worse misstep (as it would have generated nonsensical dates during the last week of every month).  I'm glad that I realized that in time.  :-)  —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 00:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
570211 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570210 +++$+++ 570210 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.208070840E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 00:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

489272 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-20 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.206074520E09 +++$+++ Hi Elkman, you may want to see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship&curid=2609426&diff=199684773&oldid=199684560 this comment] of mine on WT:RFA regarding your removal of your question. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Elkman, you may want to see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship&curid=2609426&diff=199684773&oldid=199684560 this comment] of mine on WT:RFA regarding your removal of your question. Thanks. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 21:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
489273 +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489272 +++$+++ 489272 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.206077820E09 +++$+++ It was kind of a jokey question anyway and I was probably wasting time asking it, so it's no real loss.  -- +++$+++ : It was kind of a jokey question anyway and I was probably wasting time asking it, so it's no real loss.  --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 22:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

275537 +++$+++ Neptunekh +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-03 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.178179740E09 +++$+++ Hi, I started a page about a place in Greece called the Prefecture of Fokida. Would you mind editing the page or cleaning it up? Here's the link the page: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Prefecture_of_Fokida Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi, I started a page about a place in Greece called the Prefecture of Fokida. Would you mind editing the page or cleaning it up? Here's the link the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefecture_of_Fokida Thanks! [[User:Neptunekh|Neptunekh]] 01:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
275538 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275537 +++$+++ 275537 +++$+++ 2007-05-06 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.178507460E09 +++$+++ Given the edits in question were almost a year ago, it's unlikely they were yours. The most likely reason is you're on a shared IP address.  +++$+++ :Given the edits in question were almost a year ago, it's unlikely they were yours. The most likely reason is you're on a shared IP address. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 20:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

537682 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-09 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.171063320E09 +++$+++ Can you please semi-protect [[\u015eebinkarahisar]]? Thanks, <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ Can you please semi-protect [[Şebinkarahisar]]? Thanks, <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 15:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
537683 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537682 +++$+++ 537682 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.171104360E09 +++$+++ Thanks again. <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :Thanks again. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 02:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
537684 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537682 +++$+++ 537682 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.171171500E09 +++$+++ For once, I'll awnser to a banned user, instead of rollbacking his edit as I should. Actually, if you wrote that Tudjman it would make no difference, because I will revert, as you are a banned user, and you have lost at present your right to edit wikipedia. It makes no difference what you write, or if you occupy yourself of French literature or obscure Italian\/Croatian\/God-Knows-What guys lived in Dalmatia in some time and in some place. I'm not here to mediate between Italian nationalists and you, but simply to make sure banned or blocked editors (yes, I mean YOU) don't try to break the rules by continuing to edit. I don't really care much if you believe me or not, but my wikiinterest for Dalmatia reaches very close to zero. And that's all I had too say.-- +++$+++ :For once, I'll awnser to a banned user, instead of rollbacking his edit as I should. Actually, if you wrote that Tudjman it would make no difference, because I will revert, as you are a banned user, and you have lost at present your right to edit wikipedia. It makes no difference what you write, or if you occupy yourself of French literature or obscure Italian/Croatian/God-Knows-What guys lived in Dalmatia in some time and in some place. I'm not here to mediate between Italian nationalists and you, but simply to make sure banned or blocked editors (yes, I mean YOU) don't try to break the rules by continuing to edit. I don't really care much if you believe me or not, but my wikiinterest for Dalmatia reaches very close to zero. And that's all I had too say.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

275539 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275539 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-14 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.179132720E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I'm not sure what state the article was in at the time, but you deleted John Boyle as a non-notable person. As someone who played professional football for [[:Chelsea F.C.]] for a decade, he fits the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Criteria for notability of people|notability criteria]].  +++$+++ Hi there. I'm not sure what state the article was in at the time, but you deleted John Boyle as a non-notable person. As someone who played professional football for [[:Chelsea F.C.]] for a decade, he fits the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Criteria for notability of people|notability criteria]]. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 01:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
275540 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275539 +++$+++ 275539 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.179142980E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I didn't see that in the article's history.  A vandal had overwritten the notable biography with their own.  I have restored the notable version and warned the vandal appropriately.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks, I didn't see that in the article's history.  A vandal had overwritten the notable biography with their own.  I have restored the notable version and warned the vandal appropriately.  Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 04:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

13396 +++$+++ Johnnyauau2000 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13396 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-25 06:54:00 +++$+++ 1.267109640E09 +++$+++ I hate to say this but the plot length in the article is too long. If you have the time, please go to the article and shorten the length of it so it doesn't become too much of a centerpiece. If you're still available, I'll make it worth your while.  +++$+++ I hate to say this but the plot length in the article is too long. If you have the time, please go to the article and shorten the length of it so it doesn't become too much of a centerpiece. If you're still available, I'll make it worth your while. [[User:Johnnyauau2000|Johnnyauau2000]] ([[User talk:Johnnyauau2000|talk]]) 06:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
13397 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13396 +++$+++ 13396 +++$+++ 2010-02-25 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.267141260E09 +++$+++ Hi Johnny. I don't really edit Wikipedia anymore. I haven't really got the spare time to do it, and it's become rather a chore. I only occasionally pop by and check on the odd thing. I've had a look at the [[City Hunter (film)]] article and tidied up the wording a little, but if you want to reduce it further, you might want to cut the descriptions of one or two of the less important scenes. Cheers,  +++$+++ : Hi Johnny. I don't really edit Wikipedia anymore. I haven't really got the spare time to do it, and it's become rather a chore. I only occasionally pop by and check on the odd thing. I've had a look at the [[City Hunter (film)]] article and tidied up the wording a little, but if you want to reduce it further, you might want to cut the descriptions of one or two of the less important scenes. Cheers, [[User:Gram123|Gram123]] ([[User talk:Gram123#top|talk]]) 15:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

275541 +++$+++ 82.83.87.156 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-17 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.179461220E09 +++$+++ Hi SteveO, I just wanted to ask if you could upload the Chelsea-pensioner to the wikimedia commons? You uploaded it to the english wikipedia [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Cfcpensioner.gif] and I would like to use it in the german Chelsea F.C. article. I would do it myself but I don't know under which licence it should be released. Thanks in advance! TheBlues  +++$+++ Hi SteveO, I just wanted to ask if you could upload the Chelsea-pensioner to the wikimedia commons? You uploaded it to the english wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cfcpensioner.gif] and I would like to use it in the german Chelsea F.C. article. I would do it myself but I don't know under which licence it should be released. Thanks in advance! TheBlues [[User:82.83.87.156|82.83.87.156]] 21:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
275542 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275541 +++$+++ 275541 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.179462600E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately the Commons doesn't allow you to upload copyrighted images (see [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Commons:Licensing here]). I had a quick browse through the German wikipedia and all football club crests seem to be uploaded under the <nowiki>{{Logo}}<\/nowiki> licence. My advice would be to use that one. Hope that helps.  +++$+++ :Unfortunately the Commons doesn't allow you to upload copyrighted images (see [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing here]). I had a quick browse through the German wikipedia and all football club crests seem to be uploaded under the <nowiki>{{Logo}}</nowiki> licence. My advice would be to use that one. Hope that helps. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 21:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

537686 +++$+++ Kapnisma +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-13 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.171414620E09 +++$+++ This is insulting! +++$+++ This is insulting![[User:Kapnisma|Kapnisma]] 16:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
537687 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537686 +++$+++ 537686 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.171415460E09 +++$+++ Kapnisma, give a look at the talk page: its very clear Vbb had access at least to Karavangelis memoirs, which appear to confirm his pov, including full quotes. For this I will revert, because \"this is insulting\" is not the sort of arguments I care much of.-- +++$+++ :Kapnisma, give a look at the talk page: its very clear Vbb had access at least to Karavangelis memoirs, which appear to confirm his pov, including full quotes. For this I will revert, because "this is insulting" is not the sort of arguments I care much of.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 17:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

275543 +++$+++ Lion King +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275543 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-18 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.179550980E09 +++$+++ Good luck for tomorrow Steve! Very best wishes to you and \"Yours\", you can't let 'em do The Double! Cheers,  +++$+++ Good luck for tomorrow Steve! Very best wishes to you and "Yours", you can't let 'em do The Double! Cheers, [[User:Lion King|Lion King]] 22:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
275544 +++$+++ Lion King +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275543 +++$+++ 275543 +++$+++ 2007-05-20 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.179726300E09 +++$+++ Your'e welcome! I was really pleased that you did it, I don't think I would have been able to cope with that lot doing the double, and of course it was great to see a London Club win the Cup at the new Stadium! BTW, there's nothing to apologise for, I had a big part to play as well you know - I thought I was dealing with '''[[Steve-O]]''', and just went steaming in, but that aside, I should have held fire 'til I was sure, and as far as I'm concerned, it's all water under the bridge. Once again well done! Take care,  +++$+++ :Your'e welcome! I was really pleased that you did it, I don't think I would have been able to cope with that lot doing the double, and of course it was great to see a London Club win the Cup at the new Stadium! BTW, there's nothing to apologise for, I had a big part to play as well you know - I thought I was dealing with '''[[Steve-O]]''', and just went steaming in, but that aside, I should have held fire 'til I was sure, and as far as I'm concerned, it's all water under the bridge. Once again well done! Take care, [[User:Lion King|Lion King]] 22:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

13400 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-17 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.276814400E09 +++$+++ You will see that I posted in the [[Talk:ATIC Records|talk]] page the reasons for the redirect -  given that the page had not been edited for 9 Months, there was no indication that any \"discussion\" was likley to attract any editors, I went ahead as per [[WP:BOLD]].  +++$+++ You will see that I posted in the [[Talk:ATIC Records|talk]] page the reasons for the redirect -  given that the page had not been edited for 9 Months, there was no indication that any "discussion" was likley to attract any editors, I went ahead as per [[WP:BOLD]]. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 15:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
13401 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13400 +++$+++ 13400 +++$+++ 2010-06-17 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.276816200E09 +++$+++ Nevertheless, as you've now gone down the more acceptable route of asking for proof of notability, and better yet, proposing a merge (which sounds like it may be a viable option), I'll look into improving the content of the article.  +++$+++ : Nevertheless, as you've now gone down the more acceptable route of asking for proof of notability, and better yet, proposing a merge (which sounds like it may be a viable option), I'll look into improving the content of the article. [[User:Gram123|Gram123]] ([[User talk:Gram123#top|talk]]) 16:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
13402 +++$+++ Codf1977 +++$+++ Gram123 +++$+++ 13400 +++$+++ 13401 +++$+++ 2010-06-17 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.276816800E09 +++$+++ I did <b>NOT<\/b> delete the article, just redirected it - given that the vast majority of the page is un sourced (all but the bit about the release of the second album), there was\/is nothing to merge anyway. I am sorry you feel it was underhand, I assure you it was not.  +++$+++ :: I did <b>NOT</b> delete the article, just redirected it - given that the vast majority of the page is un sourced (all but the bit about the release of the second album), there was/is nothing to merge anyway. I am sorry you feel it was underhand, I assure you it was not. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 16:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

537690 +++$+++ Kapnisma +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-13 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.171417440E09 +++$+++ Oh! and something else in the so called ''genuine'' references our dear vbb provides, the ''\u0395\u03a4\u0391\u0399\u03a1\u0395\u0399\u0391 \u039c\u0391\u039a\u0395\u0394\u039f\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039d \u03a3\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u0394\u03a9\u039f\u039d'' that he wrote is wrong. It is spelled ''\u0395\u03a4\u0391\u0399\u03a1\u0395\u0399\u0391 \u039c\u0391\u039a\u0395\u0394\u039f\u039d\u0399\u039a\u03a9\u039d \u03a3\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u0394\u03a9\u039d'',  the ''\u0391\u03a1\u03a7\u0395\u0399\u039f\u039d \u039c\u0391\u039a\u0395\u0394\u039f\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u0393\u039f\u039d\u039f\u03a3'' is wrong too, it is spelled  ''\u0391\u03a1\u03a7\u0395\u0399\u039f\u039d \u039c\u0391\u039a\u0395\u0394\u039f\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u0393\u03a9\u039d\u039f\u03a3''  +++$+++ Oh! and something else in the so called ''genuine'' references our dear vbb provides, the ''ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΚΟΝ ΣΠΟΥΔΩΟΝ'' that he wrote is wrong. It is spelled ''ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΚΩΝ ΣΠΟΥΔΩΝ'',  the ''ΑΡΧΕΙΟΝ ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΚΟΥ ΑΓΟΝΟΣ'' is wrong too, it is spelled  ''ΑΡΧΕΙΟΝ ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΚΟΥ ΑΓΩΝΟΣ'' [[User:Kapnisma|Kapnisma]] 17:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
537691 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537690 +++$+++ 537690 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.171417620E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict)I only know that Vbb wrote this: \"As I explained before, quoting Karavangelis'es own autobiographic book, his men were mostly newcomers from Greece (especially officers from the greek regular army, volunteers from Crete, various criminals that he picked somewhere and an insignificant number of locals of which one can mention only Vangelis Natsas and Kotas Hristos (so much about the \"numerous locals\" that joined the struggle, history recorded only a few). Dont blame me, he wrote the book.\" If you've got the book, and feel he gave a misleading image of Karavengelis collaboration with the Turks, then rewrite it in accordance to the text. Also remember to adress the question of the number of Greek Macedonians in the the force; if its true that it was a minority, but if you find the wording povish, you can work on that to make it more npov. As for \"criminials\", I suspect Karavengelis was speaking of local outlaws, that were often recruited in guerilla formations. I don't think you can accuse me of partiality towards Vbb: if you give a look at the talk, he passed half the time yelling at me, and left me a very nice salutiation before leaving ;-)-- +++$+++ :(edit conflict)I only know that Vbb wrote this: "As I explained before, quoting Karavangelis'es own autobiographic book, his men were mostly newcomers from Greece (especially officers from the greek regular army, volunteers from Crete, various criminals that he picked somewhere and an insignificant number of locals of which one can mention only Vangelis Natsas and Kotas Hristos (so much about the "numerous locals" that joined the struggle, history recorded only a few). Dont blame me, he wrote the book." If you've got the book, and feel he gave a misleading image of Karavengelis collaboration with the Turks, then rewrite it in accordance to the text. Also remember to adress the question of the number of Greek Macedonians in the the force; if its true that it was a minority, but if you find the wording povish, you can work on that to make it more npov. As for "criminials", I suspect Karavengelis was speaking of local outlaws, that were often recruited in guerilla formations. I don't think you can accuse me of partiality towards Vbb: if you give a look at the talk, he passed half the time yelling at me, and left me a very nice salutiation before leaving ;-)--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 17:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

537693 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537693 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-13 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.171439100E09 +++$+++ Thanks, man. It's a comment I'll never forget, and it carries much more weight when it is said by an esteemed and working and educated and neutral and amazing and big-hearted admin like you. (and you know this is not a mere retribution)  +++$+++ Thanks, man. It's a comment I'll never forget, and it carries much more weight when it is said by an esteemed and working and educated and neutral and amazing and big-hearted admin like you. (and you know this is not a mere retribution) [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 23:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
537694 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537693 +++$+++ 537693 +++$+++ 2007-02-14 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.171500300E09 +++$+++ Adesso mi metti davvero in imbarazzo... ;-) (E pensare che era tutto parte di un diabolico piano del mio nuovo datore di lavoro, W.E.S.U.C.K.B.A.D., per distruggere la reputazione di un pericoloso membro dell'Epsilon Team!) -- +++$+++ :Adesso mi metti davvero in imbarazzo... ;-) (E pensare che era tutto parte di un diabolico piano del mio nuovo datore di lavoro, W.E.S.U.C.K.B.A.D., per distruggere la reputazione di un pericoloso membro dell'Epsilon Team!) --[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
537695 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537693 +++$+++ 537694 +++$+++ 2007-02-14 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.171519500E09 +++$+++ Ah, adesso capisco... Hai gia cambiato [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANikoSilver&diff=91578153&oldid=91570097 squadra] huh? Che succede? Non ti piace vivere pericolosamente di piu? Ah, e auguri loverboy!  +++$+++ ::Ah, adesso capisco... Hai gia cambiato [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANikoSilver&diff=91578153&oldid=91570097 squadra] huh? Che succede? Non ti piace vivere pericolosamente di piu? Ah, e auguri loverboy! [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 22:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

570213 +++$+++ Squidonius +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-13 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.208076420E09 +++$+++ so I though that a tag requestion an answer might be a good idea and gave it a try[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Squidonius#testing_a_tag_idea], as it is visible and prompts someone to read it and answer. I do not think it can be overly abused like the dreaded cleanup template, but instead it may actually be a bit annoying to type. What do I do about this proposal: Do I use it on my posts with a subtitle \"this is a prototype, please comment on it in its talk page\" or is there some supreme commitee approval process? Thanks -- +++$+++ so I though that a tag requestion an answer might be a good idea and gave it a try[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Squidonius#testing_a_tag_idea], as it is visible and prompts someone to read it and answer. I do not think it can be overly abused like the dreaded cleanup template, but instead it may actually be a bit annoying to type. What do I do about this proposal: Do I use it on my posts with a subtitle "this is a prototype, please comment on it in its talk page" or is there some supreme commitee approval process? Thanks --[[User:Squidonius|Squidonius]] ([[User talk:Squidonius|talk]]) 01:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
570214 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570213 +++$+++ 570213 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.208078520E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 02:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
570215 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570213 +++$+++ 570213 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.208212140E09 +++$+++ ''This discussion moved back to the [[User talk:Darwinek|talk page]] of Darwinek.'' -- +++$+++ :''This discussion moved back to the [[User talk:Darwinek|talk page]] of Darwinek.'' --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 15:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

537697 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537697 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.172038500E09 +++$+++ ...too much alcohol or are we talking to ourselves lately? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Aldux&curid=2227975&diff=109632329&oldid=109604863] Thanks man, I needed that laugh!  +++$+++ ...too much alcohol or are we talking to ourselves lately? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aldux&curid=2227975&diff=109632329&oldid=109604863] Thanks man, I needed that laugh! [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 22:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
537698 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537697 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.172038980E09 +++$+++ Ah yes, I'm afraid I'm approaching the last stage of wikiholism ;-)-- +++$+++ ::Ah yes, I'm afraid I'm approaching the last stage of wikiholism ;-)--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 22:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
537699 +++$+++ f-m-t +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537697 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 08:50:00 +++$+++ 1.172076600E09 +++$+++ Hey guys, I can make those maps... but only if you can get me reassurance that it isn't a copyright violation. I was asking some people before on commons, but was told that even tracing round an existing map would be copyvio (I had intended to do it for [[districts of Tajikistan]]).  +++$+++ :::Hey guys, I can make those maps... but only if you can get me reassurance that it isn't a copyright violation. I was asking some people before on commons, but was told that even tracing round an existing map would be copyvio (I had intended to do it for [[districts of Tajikistan]]). [[User:f-m-t|Francis Tyers]] [[User_talk:f-m-t|·]] 08:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
537700 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537697 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.172077200E09 +++$+++ Those maps should be easy enough to recreate. You can get free contour outlines of the national boundaries on the web (if we haven't got them already), and the rest can be done easily in an SVG editor like Inkscape. Tell me if you need help; I've tried my hand at some map-making myself lately. The placement of the colored areas inside the maps doesn't qualify for copyright as such, so there's no legal problem if we re-create those.  +++$+++ ::::Those maps should be easy enough to recreate. You can get free contour outlines of the national boundaries on the web (if we haven't got them already), and the rest can be done easily in an SVG editor like Inkscape. Tell me if you need help; I've tried my hand at some map-making myself lately. The placement of the colored areas inside the maps doesn't qualify for copyright as such, so there's no legal problem if we re-create those. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 09:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
537701 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537697 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.172126280E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for your awnsers Fran and FPS. Unfortunately, I have absolutely no idea of copyright status when it comes to things other than books, which is the reason I've never uploaded a single image myself, so I can't guarantee anything regards copyvio. As for the maps, I don't need them all obviously, as they're 15, and some of these are historically innacurate. Again, thanks for anything you can do. And Fran, what do you think of [[Toyota War]] now, with the new lead? If it's ready I'll put it through a GA review.-- +++$+++ ::::Thanks a lot for your awnsers Fran and FPS. Unfortunately, I have absolutely no idea of copyright status when it comes to things other than books, which is the reason I've never uploaded a single image myself, so I can't guarantee anything regards copyvio. As for the maps, I don't need them all obviously, as they're 15, and some of these are historically innacurate. Again, thanks for anything you can do. And Fran, what do you think of [[Toyota War]] now, with the new lead? If it's ready I'll put it through a GA review.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 22:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
537702 +++$+++ f-m-t +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537697 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.172451360E09 +++$+++ Opa, sorry for the late reply. I haven't been watching your talk page. I reckon Toyota War would make a fine GA right now. I'll take another look at the maps on monday. If you could identify 2-3 that would be particularly helpful that would be good. -  +++$+++ :::::Opa, sorry for the late reply. I haven't been watching your talk page. I reckon Toyota War would make a fine GA right now. I'll take another look at the maps on monday. If you could identify 2-3 that would be particularly helpful that would be good. - [[User:f-m-t|Francis Tyers]] [[User_talk:f-m-t|·]] 16:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

275556 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-11 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.181629860E09 +++$+++ How about this BBC article?[http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/uk\/37209.stm]. It details the crime and the sentence received.  +++$+++ How about this BBC article?[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/37209.stm]. It details the crime and the sentence received. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 23:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
275557 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275556 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.181630160E09 +++$+++ I would accept it, provided you do not emphasize the details of the crime beyond the unavoidable & do not copy the content--some of these articles do copy newspaper content, and that makes them an easy target.  Doesn't mean that others would accept it--I'm very flexible about this but my views are not always taken as consensus. Good luck with it. ''' +++$+++ **I would accept it, provided you do not emphasize the details of the crime beyond the unavoidable & do not copy the content--some of these articles do copy newspaper content, and that makes them an easy target.  Doesn't mean that others would accept it--I'm very flexible about this but my views are not always taken as consensus. Good luck with it. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' 23:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

13414 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13414 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.310704380E09 +++$+++ Hey there, Frickative. Looks like our old thread got previously archived, so I started a new one. ;) With the announcements that the main three actors (Colfer, Michele, and Monteith) will be departing the show, I'm going to work on improving some of their character articles. [[Finn Hudson]]'s is probably the worst out of all of them, which is weird because he's a pretty big character. I think I'm going to start that soon. I'll do some source digging tonight, do you think you could do a quick check and see if you might have some useful ones stored from circa 2009? That would help a lot, as the \"Casting\" section is generally the hardest. Also, I requested a second peer review for [[Kurt Hummel]]. I still feel a little burned from the last FAC, but I think I might want to take that back there eventually down the line.  +++$+++ Hey there, Frickative. Looks like our old thread got previously archived, so I started a new one. ;) With the announcements that the main three actors (Colfer, Michele, and Monteith) will be departing the show, I'm going to work on improving some of their character articles. [[Finn Hudson]]'s is probably the worst out of all of them, which is weird because he's a pretty big character. I think I'm going to start that soon. I'll do some source digging tonight, do you think you could do a quick check and see if you might have some useful ones stored from circa 2009? That would help a lot, as the "Casting" section is generally the hardest. Also, I requested a second peer review for [[Kurt Hummel]]. I still feel a little burned from the last FAC, but I think I might want to take that back there eventually down the line. [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 21:33, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
13415 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13414 +++$+++ 13414 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311019500E09 +++$+++ Hey, I'm glad you're taking on Finn, I think that article and [[Puck (Glee)]] are probably the weakest of the whole lot :D I've looked through my bookmarks and don't think I have anything useful, but I remember a ''tonne'' of early interviews where Cory Monteith repeated and repeated his casting story about sending in a tape of him drumming, being asked for a singing tape and doing REO Speedwagon. (See, I've read so many that the details are burned into my brain :p). So hopefully \"Casting\" shouldn't be as difficult as for some of the other characters. Good luck with Kurt - I don't blame you at all for feeling burned out, it's been far from a pleasant experience, but your perseverance is commendable :) Also, I'm really sorry I haven't collaborated on Santana yet. My internet connection has been really dodgy this month, and I'm about to have a busy fortnight, but I really, really do want to work on it when I'm able to.  +++$+++ :Hey, I'm glad you're taking on Finn, I think that article and [[Puck (Glee)]] are probably the weakest of the whole lot :D I've looked through my bookmarks and don't think I have anything useful, but I remember a ''tonne'' of early interviews where Cory Monteith repeated and repeated his casting story about sending in a tape of him drumming, being asked for a singing tape and doing REO Speedwagon. (See, I've read so many that the details are burned into my brain :p). So hopefully "Casting" shouldn't be as difficult as for some of the other characters. Good luck with Kurt - I don't blame you at all for feeling burned out, it's been far from a pleasant experience, but your perseverance is commendable :) Also, I'm really sorry I haven't collaborated on Santana yet. My internet connection has been really dodgy this month, and I'm about to have a busy fortnight, but I really, really do want to work on it when I'm able to. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 13:05, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
13416 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13414 +++$+++ 13415 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311033900E09 +++$+++ Mike Chang's pretty weak too, although in his case the Storylines section is far too long for any character, much less one who's had less screen time than Finn or Puck. (None of these three articles are C level yet, nor do they have much beyond their Storylines.) Finn and Puck could clearly use the love, though, given their importance. Frickative, I'm glad you're back on line again. HorrorFan121, I'm going to be kind of busy through the end of the month, but if you'd like me to take a look at anything, I'm happy to, and I can probably squeeze in some time here and there. Some changes are easy, but editing takes more time and effort. (And I do better printing it out if I really want to make cuts and move text around.)  +++$+++ ::Mike Chang's pretty weak too, although in his case the Storylines section is far too long for any character, much less one who's had less screen time than Finn or Puck. (None of these three articles are C level yet, nor do they have much beyond their Storylines.) Finn and Puck could clearly use the love, though, given their importance. Frickative, I'm glad you're back on line again. HorrorFan121, I'm going to be kind of busy through the end of the month, but if you'd like me to take a look at anything, I'm happy to, and I can probably squeeze in some time here and there. Some changes are easy, but editing takes more time and effort. (And I do better printing it out if I really want to make cuts and move text around.) [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 17:05, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
13417 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13414 +++$+++ 13415 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311037560E09 +++$+++ You know, I really shouldn't write things like that about ''Glee'' pages. The next thing I know, I'm looking at the Mike Chang page and editing on the screen; the storyline's halfway done (season one section), and while it could probably use more cuts, it is trimmed down by about 75 words. I'll try to finish it off soon, and fix the intro; someone else will have to get to the meat of the page before it can be upgraded to C status.  +++$+++ ::You know, I really shouldn't write things like that about ''Glee'' pages. The next thing I know, I'm looking at the Mike Chang page and editing on the screen; the storyline's halfway done (season one section), and while it could probably use more cuts, it is trimmed down by about 75 words. I'll try to finish it off soon, and fix the intro; someone else will have to get to the meat of the page before it can be upgraded to C status. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 18:06, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
13418 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13414 +++$+++ 13417 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.311053220E09 +++$+++ BlueMoonset, if you could possibly look at Finn's \"Storyline\" section that could be great. I don't know if anybody has done any good copy-editing on it, but his article received the most unsourced additions in the past year from looking at it from time to time. Honestly, as for [[Mike Chang]], I don't think there's much we can do. I just did a quick check on Google and didn't see much relating to the necessary sub-sections, such as \"Casting\" and \"Characterization\". Poor Mike. =\/  +++$+++ :::BlueMoonset, if you could possibly look at Finn's "Storyline" section that could be great. I don't know if anybody has done any good copy-editing on it, but his article received the most unsourced additions in the past year from looking at it from time to time. Honestly, as for [[Mike Chang]], I don't think there's much we can do. I just did a quick check on Google and didn't see much relating to the necessary sub-sections, such as "Casting" and "Characterization". Poor Mike. =/ [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 22:27, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
13419 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13414 +++$+++ 13418 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311333840E09 +++$+++ We'll probably get more to work with re Mike once the third season's under way. But Karofsky...have you made any progress on the other sections? I just did a tiny touchup on the Storyline, and realized that not much has happened elsewhere. Is there a chance that the article could go live sometime in August?  +++$+++ ::::We'll probably get more to work with re Mike once the third season's under way. But Karofsky...have you made any progress on the other sections? I just did a tiny touchup on the Storyline, and realized that not much has happened elsewhere. Is there a chance that the article could go live sometime in August? [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 04:24, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
13420 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13414 +++$+++ 13419 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311343080E09 +++$+++ Finn's storyline is finished, and I strongly suspect I went overboard. Admittedly, he's an important character, but I may have expanded a bit too much. I did borrow some of the prose for the football championship from the Karofsky storyline. It looks like the first paragraph is overlong, but that may be deceiving; it could be that later ones should be shorter. I thought about starting the second (Kurt\/Burt\/Carole) paragraph with Finn arranging Kurt's football tryout, but it seemed like a droppable detail. Anyone want to try editing the whole section down a bit, or should that wait for now?  +++$+++ :::::Finn's storyline is finished, and I strongly suspect I went overboard. Admittedly, he's an important character, but I may have expanded a bit too much. I did borrow some of the prose for the football championship from the Karofsky storyline. It looks like the first paragraph is overlong, but that may be deceiving; it could be that later ones should be shorter. I thought about starting the second (Kurt/Burt/Carole) paragraph with Finn arranging Kurt's football tryout, but it seemed like a droppable detail. Anyone want to try editing the whole section down a bit, or should that wait for now? [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 06:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
13421 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13414 +++$+++ 13420 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.311372540E09 +++$+++ Good work on trimming Mike Chang down :) I wouldn't worry too much about Finn being on the long side - 1,000 words is probably around the high-end of acceptable, and he is one of the most central characters. Once the third season starts, it may need pulling in a bit to accommodate new additions, but as the article's other sections are expanded, some elements may naturally alter anyway. I found a [http:\/\/www2.macleans.ca\/2010\/11\/15\/dont-stop-believing\/2\/ source] which goes quite indepth on the ins and outs of Monteith's casting process, right down to who submitted his tape and how many hours he drove to audition, so hopefully that can be of some use!  +++$+++ ::::::Good work on trimming Mike Chang down :) I wouldn't worry too much about Finn being on the long side - 1,000 words is probably around the high-end of acceptable, and he is one of the most central characters. Once the third season starts, it may need pulling in a bit to accommodate new additions, but as the article's other sections are expanded, some elements may naturally alter anyway. I found a [http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/15/dont-stop-believing/2/ source] which goes quite indepth on the ins and outs of Monteith's casting process, right down to who submitted his tape and how many hours he drove to audition, so hopefully that can be of some use! [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 15:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

89617 +++$+++ Stanley011 +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-19 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.150768500E09 +++$+++ Hi Hal.  I was just wondering why you removed the line in the Glick section about Glick continuously interupting O'Reilly--I saw the interview, and believe me it happened.  Not having that line makes it look as though O'Reilly cut his mic because of disagreement in opinion, which is misleading.  +++$+++ Hi Hal.  I was just wondering why you removed the line in the Glick section about Glick continuously interupting O'Reilly--I saw the interview, and believe me it happened.  Not having that line makes it look as though O'Reilly cut his mic because of disagreement in opinion, which is misleading. [[User:Stanley011|Stanley011]] 18:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
89618 +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89617 +++$+++ 89617 +++$+++ 2006-06-19 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.150770540E09 +++$+++ Hello!  In response to your question about why I removed the line about \"Glick continuously interupting O'Reilly\":  Frankly, from the available transcripts, it seems like the conversation quickly broke down to the point where both participants simply wouldn't let each other talk.  To me, it definitely seems like O'Reilly did most of the interrupting, but thats my admittedly POV interpretation.  I think its best to conform to the way the O'Reilly\/Franken dispute section has been recently edited...don't pass blame on either participant, simply present the basic facts and let the reader follow the provided links for more info\/details.  Not sure if you'll agree with me but thats why I made the change. +++$+++ *Hello!  In response to your question about why I removed the line about "Glick continuously interupting O'Reilly":  Frankly, from the available transcripts, it seems like the conversation quickly broke down to the point where both participants simply wouldn't let each other talk.  To me, it definitely seems like O'Reilly did most of the interrupting, but thats my admittedly POV interpretation.  I think its best to conform to the way the O'Reilly/Franken dispute section has been recently edited...don't pass blame on either participant, simply present the basic facts and let the reader follow the provided links for more info/details.  Not sure if you'll agree with me but thats why I made the change.[[User:Hal Raglan|Hal Raglan]] 19:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

275564 +++$+++ Gran2 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-30 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.183247700E09 +++$+++ As one of the main people that Chelsea to FA status, I thought you might be interested to know that while casually searching, I found a really great Flickr user, with a load of Chelsea related images. All of which are free use. On a quick run through I got an image for the Carling Cup Final, Essien, Steve Clarke, Hilario and a face on image of Frank Lampard. You might be able to find some other useful ones as well. [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/46357488@N00\/sets\/72157600070376698\/ here]  +++$+++ As one of the main people that Chelsea to FA status, I thought you might be interested to know that while casually searching, I found a really great Flickr user, with a load of Chelsea related images. All of which are free use. On a quick run through I got an image for the Carling Cup Final, Essien, Steve Clarke, Hilario and a face on image of Frank Lampard. You might be able to find some other useful ones as well. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/46357488@N00/sets/72157600070376698/ here] [[User:Gran2|Gran]]<sup>[[User talk:Gran2|2]]</sup> 16:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
275565 +++$+++ Gran2 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275564 +++$+++ 275564 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.183345860E09 +++$+++ Yeah, as said, the are all Creative Commons 2.0, which is free to use on here. And the image taker will have chosen that license, so he shouldn't have a problem with it.  +++$+++ :Yeah, as said, the are all Creative Commons 2.0, which is free to use on here. And the image taker will have chosen that license, so he shouldn't have a problem with it. [[User:Gran2|Gran]]<sup>[[User talk:Gran2|2]]</sup> 20:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

13422 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311378960E09 +++$+++ {{outdent}} Crap! I forgot all about Karofsky's page. I'll get to work on that when I finish [[Finn Hudson]]. By the way, that's an excellent source Frick. Nice find. The \"Storyline\" section should look shorter once the whole article is completed, so I wouldn't worry about that.  +++$+++ {{outdent}} Crap! I forgot all about Karofsky's page. I'll get to work on that when I finish [[Finn Hudson]]. By the way, that's an excellent source Frick. Nice find. The "Storyline" section should look shorter once the whole article is completed, so I wouldn't worry about that. [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 16:56, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
13423 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.311395220E09 +++$+++ Thanks, you two. Glad Finn's Storyline's in reasonable shape, and I'll be looking forward to see Karofsky bloom after Finn does. I think I'll try to hit Puck's Storyline in the next few days. HorrorFan121, can you take a look at the actual\/citable conversation on the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television\/Glee_task_force#Actual_cast_vs._citable_cast Glee task force] page? So far it's been me and Frickative; it'd be nice to have at least one other voice from the task force heard from on the matter before the thing gets archived.  +++$+++ :Thanks, you two. Glad Finn's Storyline's in reasonable shape, and I'll be looking forward to see Karofsky bloom after Finn does. I think I'll try to hit Puck's Storyline in the next few days. HorrorFan121, can you take a look at the actual/citable conversation on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television/Glee_task_force#Actual_cast_vs._citable_cast Glee task force] page? So far it's been me and Frickative; it'd be nice to have at least one other voice from the task force heard from on the matter before the thing gets archived. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:27, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
13424 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311416040E09 +++$+++ BTW, HorrorFan121, I think the Season 1\/Season 2 division won't work for Finn without a major rewrite; the Kurt paragraph covers both seasons, and even the first paragraph ends with a mention of the second season. I'm about to make a minor fix to a sentence in Storylines, so I'll take the headers out then. If you think it's important, we can always divide the Kurt material in two, but I rather like how it's all together. I wonder if we should try to handle multi-season character storylines this way as a general rule.  +++$+++ :BTW, HorrorFan121, I think the Season 1/Season 2 division won't work for Finn without a major rewrite; the Kurt paragraph covers both seasons, and even the first paragraph ends with a mention of the second season. I'm about to make a minor fix to a sentence in Storylines, so I'll take the headers out then. If you think it's important, we can always divide the Kurt material in two, but I rather like how it's all together. I wonder if we should try to handle multi-season character storylines this way as a general rule. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
13425 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13424 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311416700E09 +++$+++ FWIW, I do like keeping storylines together where possible\/sensible, rather than sticking to a strictly chronological structure - ''Glee'' is all over the place at the best of times, so it probably helps keep things cohesive for readers less familiar with the subject.  +++$+++ ::FWIW, I do like keeping storylines together where possible/sensible, rather than sticking to a strictly chronological structure - ''Glee'' is all over the place at the best of times, so it probably helps keep things cohesive for readers less familiar with the subject. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 03:25, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
13426 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13425 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311417960E09 +++$+++ Okay, I can go undo the brackets right now. I hope I didn't end up reaching an edit conflict somewhere in there as I wasn't checking my watchlist to see your message here. Finn's \"Casting\" section looks pretty decent now and I'm currently looking up some stuff on the Rachel\/Finn relationship and potential stuff to use for a \"Characterization\" section. By the way, I'll take a look at the discussion [[WP:GLEE]] and see if I can add my opinion to it.  +++$+++ :::Okay, I can go undo the brackets right now. I hope I didn't end up reaching an edit conflict somewhere in there as I wasn't checking my watchlist to see your message here. Finn's "Casting" section looks pretty decent now and I'm currently looking up some stuff on the Rachel/Finn relationship and potential stuff to use for a "Characterization" section. By the way, I'll take a look at the discussion [[WP:GLEE]] and see if I can add my opinion to it. [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 03:46, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
13427 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13426 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311421860E09 +++$+++ No problem. I managed to fit in my storyline edits in between; I did have to be careful not to undo your edits (Show changes is a wonderful thing), and got in two minutes after your last edit, which removed those sections so I didn't have to. It looks to me like Finn's at least a C and well on his way to a B; the major piece not yet addressed is his singing: how much, which singles\/albums, etc. Looking forward to seeing our thoughts on [[WP:GLEE]].  +++$+++ ::::No problem. I managed to fit in my storyline edits in between; I did have to be careful not to undo your edits (Show changes is a wonderful thing), and got in two minutes after your last edit, which removed those sections so I didn't have to. It looks to me like Finn's at least a C and well on his way to a B; the major piece not yet addressed is his singing: how much, which singles/albums, etc. Looking forward to seeing our thoughts on [[WP:GLEE]]. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 04:51, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
13428 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311420540E09 +++$+++ Sorry to diverge from Finn for a moment - I cba to start a new section for something so minor - but HF, do you have any thoughts on using [http:\/\/popwatch.ew.com\/2009\/10\/10\/glee-yellow-dress\/ this] source in [[Santana Lopez]]? I was looking for info on her costuming, and here Lou Eyrich says of \"Vitamin D\": \"Santana's [dress] was BCBG Max Azria. This is the first time you\u2019ve seen Santana not wearing her cheerleader uniform.\" Which is interesting, but, as someone points out in the comments, incorrect given that she was out of uniform in \"The Rhodes Not Taken\". Do you think it's better just ignored?  +++$+++ * Sorry to diverge from Finn for a moment - I cba to start a new section for something so minor - but HF, do you have any thoughts on using [http://popwatch.ew.com/2009/10/10/glee-yellow-dress/ this] source in [[Santana Lopez]]? I was looking for info on her costuming, and here Lou Eyrich says of "Vitamin D": "Santana's [dress] was BCBG Max Azria. This is the first time you’ve seen Santana not wearing her cheerleader uniform." Which is interesting, but, as someone points out in the comments, incorrect given that she was out of uniform in "The Rhodes Not Taken". Do you think it's better just ignored? [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 04:29, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
13429 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311422520E09 +++$+++ I think it could be something interesting to include because Santana's been primarily featured in her cheerleading outfit. I guess we can just insert the comment on it in the \"Characterization\" section, and I'm glad you're finally getting a chance to work on Santana! I had sort of put her article on the back burner for a bit. The article is pretty much complete, aside from the \"Reception\" section. Re: BlueMoonset- I would say it's a C right now, but once I expand on the \"Characterization\" and \"Reception\" sections it should be a B and on it's way to becoming a GA.  +++$+++ :I think it could be something interesting to include because Santana's been primarily featured in her cheerleading outfit. I guess we can just insert the comment on it in the "Characterization" section, and I'm glad you're finally getting a chance to work on Santana! I had sort of put her article on the back burner for a bit. The article is pretty much complete, aside from the "Reception" section. Re: BlueMoonset- I would say it's a C right now, but once I expand on the "Characterization" and "Reception" sections it should be a B and on it's way to becoming a GA. [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 05:02, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
13430 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13429 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311447840E09 +++$+++ The entire quote doesn't have to be included, just the relevant portion; another possibility is adding context around it. Sure, Santana was out of her cheerleading outfit, but she just exchanged it for the standard group cowboy and blue costumes in the \"Rhodes\" performances. The \"Vitamin D\" performance was the first time she was shown in an individual outfit, even though it was, admittedly, part of a costuming \"theme\". I think it's important, if we know something's not strictly accurate in a quote, to make sure the facts are correctly stated in the article.  +++$+++ ::The entire quote doesn't have to be included, just the relevant portion; another possibility is adding context around it. Sure, Santana was out of her cheerleading outfit, but she just exchanged it for the standard group cowboy and blue costumes in the "Rhodes" performances. The "Vitamin D" performance was the first time she was shown in an individual outfit, even though it was, admittedly, part of a costuming "theme". I think it's important, if we know something's not strictly accurate in a quote, to make sure the facts are correctly stated in the article. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 12:04, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
13431 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13430 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311559320E09 +++$+++ Did you read about this, Frickative? More of Ryan Murphy's ever changing mind. Haha. [http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2011\/07\/24\/glee-lea-michele-cory-monteith-chris-colfer-not-leaving_n_908095.html Michele, Colfer, and Monteith NOT Leaving]  +++$+++ :::Did you read about this, Frickative? More of Ryan Murphy's ever changing mind. Haha. [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/24/glee-lea-michele-cory-monteith-chris-colfer-not-leaving_n_908095.html Michele, Colfer, and Monteith NOT Leaving] [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 19:02, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
13432 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13431 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311582840E09 +++$+++ I shouldn't laugh, but we seem to get played every time. It looks like the pages for Rachel and Finn need updating, and someone's already put in \"New York\" as Sam's last episode. Being the lazy type, if I edit those pages, I'll use the same TV Line links on the Season 3 page. I'm thinking that Sam and Mercedes should not be listed as significant others on each other's pages\u2014something significant could have developed, but we have no evidence that it did\u2014though I'm wondering how you deal with a one-season character in the second year of a three-or-more-season show.  +++$+++ ::::I shouldn't laugh, but we seem to get played every time. It looks like the pages for Rachel and Finn need updating, and someone's already put in "New York" as Sam's last episode. Being the lazy type, if I edit those pages, I'll use the same TV Line links on the Season 3 page. I'm thinking that Sam and Mercedes should not be listed as significant others on each other's pages—something significant could have developed, but we have no evidence that it did—though I'm wondering how you deal with a one-season character in the second year of a three-or-more-season show. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
13433 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13431 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311595080E09 +++$+++ I did my best by Sam in his page and on Characters of Glee, and fixed my refs errors on Season 3; Sam and Mercedes are no longer significant others. (Mercedes is less significant for Sam than Santana is, in terms of relationship time, so I don't see how we can justify Mercedes if Santana is considered ineligible.) As for Finn and Rachel and Kurt, I'm going to let you two figure out how much you want to unwind, modify, or otherwise change the \"it's their last season\" paragraphs. Whether it's worth keeping the Gonzalez quote for Finn and Rachel, for example...  +++$+++ ::::I did my best by Sam in his page and on Characters of Glee, and fixed my refs errors on Season 3; Sam and Mercedes are no longer significant others. (Mercedes is less significant for Sam than Santana is, in terms of relationship time, so I don't see how we can justify Mercedes if Santana is considered ineligible.) As for Finn and Rachel and Kurt, I'm going to let you two figure out how much you want to unwind, modify, or otherwise change the "it's their last season" paragraphs. Whether it's worth keeping the Gonzalez quote for Finn and Rachel, for example... [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 04:58, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
13434 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13431 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.311657060E09 +++$+++ Harking back to the above, I've just done a complete revision of Puck, including divisions into first and second seasons, bringing it up to date, and probably making the first season too long...but I thought it was important to go into a bit more depth on his bullying and promiscuity. I'm pretty sure this article is even longer than Finn's; no doubt cuts will be made at some point...by someone other than me. :-)  +++$+++ ::::Harking back to the above, I've just done a complete revision of Puck, including divisions into first and second seasons, bringing it up to date, and probably making the first season too long...but I thought it was important to go into a bit more depth on his bullying and promiscuity. I'm pretty sure this article is even longer than Finn's; no doubt cuts will be made at some point...by someone other than me. :-) [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 22:11, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
13435 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13434 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.311809700E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the super slow reply (I'm averaging about one edit a day at the moment!) but ha, I did laugh at all the contradictory information that came out of Comic-Con. Definitely going to have to stock up on decent synonyms for \"Murphy claimed\/suggested\/made up on the spot\" going forward :p. I haven't been keeping track of my watch-listed articles very well, and haven't had chance to read the new \"Storyline\" section for Puck yet, but all the s3 updates I've seen by you, BlueMoonset, have looked good - kudos for keeping on top of it all! I definitely agree with not listing Sam\/Mercedes as significant others (is a single-scene relationship a new record for ''Glee''? Haha.) And thank you both for the comments on the Santana\/clothing source - I'll hopefully get going on that article properly at the start of next week.  +++$+++ :::::Sorry for the super slow reply (I'm averaging about one edit a day at the moment!) but ha, I did laugh at all the contradictory information that came out of Comic-Con. Definitely going to have to stock up on decent synonyms for "Murphy claimed/suggested/made up on the spot" going forward :p. I haven't been keeping track of my watch-listed articles very well, and haven't had chance to read the new "Storyline" section for Puck yet, but all the s3 updates I've seen by you, BlueMoonset, have looked good - kudos for keeping on top of it all! I definitely agree with not listing Sam/Mercedes as significant others (is a single-scene relationship a new record for ''Glee''? Haha.) And thank you both for the comments on the Santana/clothing source - I'll hopefully get going on that article properly at the start of next week. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 16:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
13436 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13435 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.311849900E09 +++$+++ No need to apologize; you're busy through the end of the month, and we know it. As for Sam\/Mercedes, it's sort of two scenes: Sam magically teleports across the stage at Nationals to give Mercedes a hug before teleporting back in time to take the group bow, so we know there's ''something'' there. :-) I've been managing to keep up with my own watchlist pretty well, though it's almost up to 100 ''Glee''-related pages. Probably small change compared to the rest of you, but we seem to be getting a lot of unhelpful edits the past few days... Getting back to Finn, though: HorrorFan121, I was wondering whether the Casting and Creation section was stable, or if you were planning additional edits to it. I can see some smoothing I'd like to do, but it doesn't make sense to start work if you still have more changes to make. (Frickative, I'm not sure of the etiquette; are these three-way multi-topic conversations on ''Glee'' page edit plans okay, or is there another, preferred way of handling this?)  +++$+++ ::::::No need to apologize; you're busy through the end of the month, and we know it. As for Sam/Mercedes, it's sort of two scenes: Sam magically teleports across the stage at Nationals to give Mercedes a hug before teleporting back in time to take the group bow, so we know there's ''something'' there. :-) I've been managing to keep up with my own watchlist pretty well, though it's almost up to 100 ''Glee''-related pages. Probably small change compared to the rest of you, but we seem to be getting a lot of unhelpful edits the past few days... Getting back to Finn, though: HorrorFan121, I was wondering whether the Casting and Creation section was stable, or if you were planning additional edits to it. I can see some smoothing I'd like to do, but it doesn't make sense to start work if you still have more changes to make. (Frickative, I'm not sure of the etiquette; are these three-way multi-topic conversations on ''Glee'' page edit plans okay, or is there another, preferred way of handling this?) [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:45, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
13437 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13436 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311893940E09 +++$+++ Oh, I forgot about the teleporting hug, that was cute :) I think mass multi-strand discussions are fine - if we were all seriously focussing on one particular article, it would be better over at that article's talk page, but user talk allows for less formality. I sometimes wonder if we should discuss general plans over at WP:GLEE, in the hopes of attracting more participation, but seeing as the last thread there attracted nothing but tumbleweed, I guess it wouldn't make much difference.  +++$+++ :::::::Oh, I forgot about the teleporting hug, that was cute :) I think mass multi-strand discussions are fine - if we were all seriously focussing on one particular article, it would be better over at that article's talk page, but user talk allows for less formality. I sometimes wonder if we should discuss general plans over at WP:GLEE, in the hopes of attracting more participation, but seeing as the last thread there attracted nothing but tumbleweed, I guess it wouldn't make much difference. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 15:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
13438 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13437 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312537560E09 +++$+++ Not sure if this will pan out (it most likely ever does), but Hollywood.com announced four new characters joining the canvas next season. There's Sugar (a rich snob), Shelia (a punk with a soft side), Nancy Bleithman (a geometry teacher objective of the arts), and a football player named Bubba (Mercedes' new love interest). [http:\/\/www.hollywood.com\/news\/New_Glee_Characters_Revealed\/7824056 New ''Glee'' Characters Revealed]  +++$+++ ::::::::Not sure if this will pan out (it most likely ever does), but Hollywood.com announced four new characters joining the canvas next season. There's Sugar (a rich snob), Shelia (a punk with a soft side), Nancy Bleithman (a geometry teacher objective of the arts), and a football player named Bubba (Mercedes' new love interest). [http://www.hollywood.com/news/New_Glee_Characters_Revealed/7824056 New ''Glee'' Characters Revealed] [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 02:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
13439 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13438 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.312573320E09 +++$+++ Wow, his name is really Bubba? I hoped that was a joke at Comic-Con, haha! Still, it'll be interesting to see how many of them actually make the show, and how many go the way of Rachel's Christian rival and the male!Mercedes R&B singer. The new teacher also seems completely pointless given what they did with Brenda Castle in s1 (ie. absolutely nothing). Thanks for the link, though, interesting read.  +++$+++ :::::::::Wow, his name is really Bubba? I hoped that was a joke at Comic-Con, haha! Still, it'll be interesting to see how many of them actually make the show, and how many go the way of Rachel's Christian rival and the male!Mercedes R&B singer. The new teacher also seems completely pointless given what they did with Brenda Castle in s1 (ie. absolutely nothing). Thanks for the link, though, interesting read. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 12:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
13440 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13422 +++$+++ 13439 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.312630140E09 +++$+++ Yeah, Bubba. I read the same on TV Line. Hope it's a nickname, like Puck. But if he's that big, I imagine he can call himself whatever he wants to. The big question: will he join the glee club? With the loss of Sam, the club's down to five males (four of whom sing), and with the addition of these two new girls, that makes nine females. Bubba could make six...but if not, it's an argument for them planning on transferring Blaine in, unless they have one or more unrevealed male students being added in. I wouldn't be surprised if there's another guy being contemplated. Or maybe the winner of the Glee Project will be a guy, and not Sue's archenemy after all (Falchuk seemed to be downplaying the nemesis bit at Comic-Con). Actually, what has me up in arms right now is the announcement that if you don't have a satellite or cable provider here in the states (so far the Dish network is the only one signed up), the fox.com episodes are going to be delayed by a full week starting August 15. I only watch on line (and on DVD), so having that kind of delay is really going to mess up my participation here, as I try to avoid spoilers. Overnight is reasonably easy; an entire week's going to be impossible.  +++$+++ ::::::::::Yeah, Bubba. I read the same on TV Line. Hope it's a nickname, like Puck. But if he's that big, I imagine he can call himself whatever he wants to. The big question: will he join the glee club? With the loss of Sam, the club's down to five males (four of whom sing), and with the addition of these two new girls, that makes nine females. Bubba could make six...but if not, it's an argument for them planning on transferring Blaine in, unless they have one or more unrevealed male students being added in. I wouldn't be surprised if there's another guy being contemplated. Or maybe the winner of the Glee Project will be a guy, and not Sue's archenemy after all (Falchuk seemed to be downplaying the nemesis bit at Comic-Con). Actually, what has me up in arms right now is the announcement that if you don't have a satellite or cable provider here in the states (so far the Dish network is the only one signed up), the fox.com episodes are going to be delayed by a full week starting August 15. I only watch on line (and on DVD), so having that kind of delay is really going to mess up my participation here, as I try to avoid spoilers. Overnight is reasonably easy; an entire week's going to be impossible. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 04:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

526525 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526525 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-07 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.170874380E09 +++$+++ [[James Sabow\/JDSabow evidence 2007]]  Should this page be on Wikipedia?  Also, correct me if I am wrong, but is he selling cannabis seeds via the picture on the right hand side of his user page?  I think he is-- +++$+++ [[James Sabow/JDSabow evidence 2007]]  Should this page be on Wikipedia?  Also, correct me if I am wrong, but is he selling cannabis seeds via the picture on the right hand side of his user page?  I think he is--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 10:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
526526 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526525 +++$+++ 526525 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.170945300E09 +++$+++ One more for a look see.  A new user created this page - [[Over-the-beach capability]].  The term does not exist and the article is a collection of jibberish.  Could you afd this thing if you think it is appropriate.  My track record with the newbies is not good even though it seems this guy is trying to really contribute.  Thanks -- +++$+++ * One more for a look see.  A new user created this page - [[Over-the-beach capability]].  The term does not exist and the article is a collection of jibberish.  Could you afd this thing if you think it is appropriate.  My track record with the newbies is not good even though it seems this guy is trying to really contribute.  Thanks --[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 06:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
526527 +++$+++ Looper5920 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526525 +++$+++ 526526 +++$+++ 2007-02-09 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.171032000E09 +++$+++ Just a heads up...I think [[User:JPatrickBedell]] is also using [[User:Meltmycone]] as an occassional name for adding Sabow details to articles.-- +++$+++ ::Just a heads up...I think [[User:JPatrickBedell]] is also using [[User:Meltmycone]] as an occassional name for adding Sabow details to articles.--[[User:Looper5920|Looper5920]] 06:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
526528 +++$+++ JPatrickBedell +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526525 +++$+++ 526526 +++$+++ 2007-02-09 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.171043700E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your attention to detail and your vigilance, but there is no chance that I will be using sockpuppets or editing under another name.  I apologize for any offense I might cause, and I do sincerely appreciate your feedback.  +++$+++ ::I appreciate your attention to detail and your vigilance, but there is no chance that I will be using sockpuppets or editing under another name.  I apologize for any offense I might cause, and I do sincerely appreciate your feedback. [[User:JPatrickBedell|JPatrickBedell]] 09:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

275568 +++$+++ Squash Racket +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-15 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.184512320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your response on the topic.  +++$+++ Thanks for your response on the topic. [[User:Squash Racket|Squash Racket]] 08:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
275569 +++$+++ Azlan2k7 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275568 +++$+++ 275568 +++$+++ 2007-07-20 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.184985660E09 +++$+++ Thanks +++$+++ :Thanks[[User:Azlan2k7|Azlan2k7]] 19:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

537713 +++$+++ TheFEARgod +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-01 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.172789460E09 +++$+++ See my new creation. Freely add or change something. Ciao -- +++$+++ See my new creation. Freely add or change something. Ciao --[[User:TheFEARgod|<font color="#003399">The'''FE'''</font><font color="red">'''AR'''god</font>]] ([[User talk:TheFEARgod|'''Ч''']]) 14:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
537714 +++$+++ TheFEARgod +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537713 +++$+++ 537713 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.172815080E09 +++$+++ see now Op. ''Manta'' and it's page history for my explanation. I put new headline to the main article because of military history articles standards. See example [[Slovenian War]] -- +++$+++ :see now Op. ''Manta'' and it's page history for my explanation. I put new headline to the main article because of military history articles standards. See example [[Slovenian War]] --[[User:TheFEARgod|<font color="#003399">The'''FE'''</font><font color="red">'''AR'''god</font>]] ([[User talk:TheFEARgod|'''Ч''']]) 21:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

275570 +++$+++ 82.35.59.204 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275570 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-24 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.185328260E09 +++$+++ Pat Nevin does NOT have an \"academic degree in art\". He has an arts degree. Why interfere in something you know nothing about?  +++$+++ Pat Nevin does NOT have an "academic degree in art". He has an arts degree. Why interfere in something you know nothing about? [[User:82.35.59.204|82.35.59.204]] 18:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
275571 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275570 +++$+++ 275570 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.185335940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 20:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
275572 +++$+++ 82.35.59.204 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275570 +++$+++ 275571 +++$+++ 2007-07-25 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.185360300E09 +++$+++ Maybe I should put  alink to one of the many university league tables which backs that \"pov\" up. Perhaps next time you could put a proper summary of your edits in the log  +++$+++ :: Maybe I should put  alink to one of the many university league tables which backs that "pov" up. Perhaps next time you could put a proper summary of your edits in the log [[User:82.35.59.204|82.35.59.204]] 03:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
275573 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275570 +++$+++ 275572 +++$+++ 2007-07-25 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.185411780E09 +++$+++ It would be far more helpful to add links to those many university league tables to the actual Glasgow Caledonian article, rather than one of its ex-students. Then an interested reader can decide for themselves whether it is \"one of Scotland's worst universities\".  +++$+++ :::It would be far more helpful to add links to those many university league tables to the actual Glasgow Caledonian article, rather than one of its ex-students. Then an interested reader can decide for themselves whether it is "one of Scotland's worst universities". [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 18:03, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

275574 +++$+++ ClaudioMB +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275574 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-27 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.185521400E09 +++$+++ Which fixture is copyrighted? Barclays Premier League, UEFA Champions League, FA Community Shield, FA Cup or all of them?-- +++$+++ Which fixture is copyrighted? Barclays Premier League, UEFA Champions League, FA Community Shield, FA Cup or all of them?--[[User:ClaudioMB|ClaudioMB]] 00:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
275575 +++$+++ ClaudioMB +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275574 +++$+++ 275574 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.185522420E09 +++$+++ The Barclays Premier League could be copyrighted because belongs to Barclays. The others I doubt. So, until there is a source telling any other is copyrighted, it could be used. One question, do you have a source for Barclays Premier League be copyrighted? Please, I'd like to see it. By the way, next time, before remove everything, please remove just what is copyright violation or ask for who included it to remove it. Thanks.-- +++$+++ :The Barclays Premier League could be copyrighted because belongs to Barclays. The others I doubt. So, until there is a source telling any other is copyrighted, it could be used. One question, do you have a source for Barclays Premier League be copyrighted? Please, I'd like to see it. By the way, next time, before remove everything, please remove just what is copyright violation or ask for who included it to remove it. Thanks.--[[User:ClaudioMB|ClaudioMB]] 00:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
275576 +++$+++ ClaudioMB +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275574 +++$+++ 275575 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.185532200E09 +++$+++ It's clear that the fixture is copyrighted. The table does not seem to be copyrighted. Also the results appear not to be copyrighted. So, it's possible to publish the matches after they are played. Do you know anything about that?-- +++$+++ ::It's clear that the fixture is copyrighted. The table does not seem to be copyrighted. Also the results appear not to be copyrighted. So, it's possible to publish the matches after they are played. Do you know anything about that?--[[User:ClaudioMB|ClaudioMB]] 03:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

419441 +++$+++ Ironholds +++$+++ Proteus +++$+++ 419441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-17 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.253248860E09 +++$+++ This needs to be reverted. Firstly, his most common name was simply Lord Denning, but secondly MOSTCOMMON specifically excludes people with peerages, who should go at the most appropriate title per MOS naming guidelines for peers (which is actually wrong in regards to how it's done irl, but meh). I was ignorant of this fact until a few months ago, when an attempted move by me was queried by a user citing the same thing. As per [[WP:MOSTCOMMON]] \"The principal exception is in the case of naming royalty and people with titles\".  +++$+++ This needs to be reverted. Firstly, his most common name was simply Lord Denning, but secondly MOSTCOMMON specifically excludes people with peerages, who should go at the most appropriate title per MOS naming guidelines for peers (which is actually wrong in regards to how it's done irl, but meh). I was ignorant of this fact until a few months ago, when an attempted move by me was queried by a user citing the same thing. As per [[WP:MOSTCOMMON]] "The principal exception is in the case of naming royalty and people with titles". [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 21:41, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
419442 +++$+++ Manning Bartlett +++$+++ Proteus +++$+++ 419441 +++$+++ 419441 +++$+++ 2009-09-21 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.253562780E09 +++$+++ Hi Proteus - as you seem to be offline [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] contacted me. I listed the matter at AN\/I for review and to get consensus to over-turn. [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Incidents#Odd_page_move_by_admin_-_support_for_reversion_sought]]. I hate go against you but you don't seem to be around to present your case. Cheers  +++$+++ :Hi Proteus - as you seem to be offline [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] contacted me. I listed the matter at AN/I for review and to get consensus to over-turn. [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Odd_page_move_by_admin_-_support_for_reversion_sought]]. I hate go against you but you don't seem to be around to present your case. Cheers [[User:Manning Bartlett|Manning]] ([[User talk:Manning Bartlett|talk]]) 12:53, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

613908 +++$+++ Aa77zz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-21 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.256142120E09 +++$+++ Dave, I know it isn't your area - but I would like your advice. I have detected a copyvio on [[Niger Inland Delta]] where the text is lifted directly from the World Wildlife page. I've put a note on the talk page. How should I procede? Should I simply delete the contributions by user PimRijkee?  +++$+++ Dave, I know it isn't your area - but I would like your advice. I have detected a copyvio on [[Niger Inland Delta]] where the text is lifted directly from the World Wildlife page. I've put a note on the talk page. How should I procede? Should I simply delete the contributions by user PimRijkee? [[User:Aa77zz|Aa77zz]] ([[User talk:Aa77zz|talk]]) 09:22, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
613909 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.256181480E09 +++$+++ Sorry I was out when this came up, you seem to be making good progress so far and the response on your talk page looks promising. Also good work with finding the ecology section text taken from a ESA pdf. Given the good faith response to the first finding presumably PimRijkee will take that on board as well, and obviously we'd expect Pim's cooperation to ensure there aren't any other interim or unintentional copies of text that need to be rephrased. Hope that gets sorted out amicably, let me know if you'd like me to comment or advise. Thanks for the good work,  +++$+++ :Sorry I was out when this came up, you seem to be making good progress so far and the response on your talk page looks promising. Also good work with finding the ecology section text taken from a ESA pdf. Given the good faith response to the first finding presumably PimRijkee will take that on board as well, and obviously we'd expect Pim's cooperation to ensure there aren't any other interim or unintentional copies of text that need to be rephrased. Hope that gets sorted out amicably, let me know if you'd like me to comment or advise. Thanks for the good work, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:18, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
613910 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613909 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.256518200E09 +++$+++ Nfitz, please stop trying to dig a hole for yourself. If you want content kept in articles, provide [[WP:V|verification]] or the information will be removed in accordance that policy. Attacking other editors for your failure to follow policy is not a good move. . .  +++$+++ ::Nfitz, please stop trying to dig a hole for yourself. If you want content kept in articles, provide [[WP:V|verification]] or the information will be removed in accordance that policy. Attacking other editors for your failure to follow policy is not a good move. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:50, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
613911 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.256518920E09 +++$+++ But that's what's so bizarre about this!  I've done everything possible to address the lack of verification on both the [[Daniel Greenberg]] and [[Sudbury School]] page as they have arisen.  The user in question ignores the many edits that have been made to fix the pages, and simply focuses on a couple of small disputes.  I worked through yesterday and added the references that were causing all the strife on [[Sudbury School]] which no one seems to have any issue with now that they are done ... and it turns out they were from a source already referenced twice on the same page.  And I've attempted to do the same with the [[Daniel Greenberg]] page; which obviously still needs some work, however I've continued to work in good faith, and yet have been subjected to various personal attacks by the editor in question, with very clear violations of [[WP:NPA]], [[WP:CIVIL]], and [[WP:FAITH]].  I certainly don't think pointing out to another editor that they are violating Wikipedia policies is attacking them! If editors would work together on the talk page to discuss through disputes, this project would go a lot smoother.  +++$+++ * But that's what's so bizarre about this!  I've done everything possible to address the lack of verification on both the [[Daniel Greenberg]] and [[Sudbury School]] page as they have arisen.  The user in question ignores the many edits that have been made to fix the pages, and simply focuses on a couple of small disputes.  I worked through yesterday and added the references that were causing all the strife on [[Sudbury School]] which no one seems to have any issue with now that they are done ... and it turns out they were from a source already referenced twice on the same page.  And I've attempted to do the same with the [[Daniel Greenberg]] page; which obviously still needs some work, however I've continued to work in good faith, and yet have been subjected to various personal attacks by the editor in question, with very clear violations of [[WP:NPA]], [[WP:CIVIL]], and [[WP:FAITH]].  I certainly don't think pointing out to another editor that they are violating Wikipedia policies is attacking them! If editors would work together on the talk page to discuss through disputes, this project would go a lot smoother. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 18:02, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
613912 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613911 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.256519460E09 +++$+++ And I just saw your note on a couple of other pages.  I see no text in any of these disputes that is tagged for a lack of verification. Perhaps I'm missing something?  I appreciate your intervention in this dispute ... I think we would both benefit from other points of view.  +++$+++ ** And I just saw your note on a couple of other pages.  I see no text in any of these disputes that is tagged for a lack of verification. Perhaps I'm missing something?  I appreciate your intervention in this dispute ... I think we would both benefit from other points of view. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 18:11, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
613913 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613912 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.256521020E09 +++$+++ Glad to hear it, as you say discussion and provision of verification is the way forward. Your complaints about civility appeared from my brief inspection both unjustified and an unnecessary diversion, a focus on meeting content policies is much better. . .  +++$+++ :::Glad to hear it, as you say discussion and provision of verification is the way forward. Your complaints about civility appeared from my brief inspection both unjustified and an unnecessary diversion, a focus on meeting content policies is much better. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:37, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
613914 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613913 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.256521800E09 +++$+++ Every talk post the user in question makes has all these extra unnecessary and agressive adjectives.  And the very first post he made on my talk page on the subject since August, wasn't a \"hey - let's discuss this ...\", it was a warning template threatening I be banned!  At the same time he is convinced that the subject in question isn't notable, but refuses to the logical course of AfD (though I guess he has now gone to a proper merger discussion, which is another alternative ...).  +++$+++ ::::Every talk post the user in question makes has all these extra unnecessary and agressive adjectives.  And the very first post he made on my talk page on the subject since August, wasn't a "hey - let's discuss this ...", it was a warning template threatening I be banned!  At the same time he is convinced that the subject in question isn't notable, but refuses to the logical course of AfD (though I guess he has now gone to a proper merger discussion, which is another alternative ...). [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 18:50, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
613915 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.256713800E09 +++$+++ Here's another example of the lack of civility I previously noted; did you see the follow-up response to your comment http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Hrafn&diff=321980335&oldid=321972036 ?  I've never seen an editor behave in this manner before. Should I be reporting stuff like this to [[WP:ANB]]?  +++$+++ * Here's another example of the lack of civility I previously noted; did you see the follow-up response to your comment http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hrafn&diff=321980335&oldid=321972036 ?  I've never seen an editor behave in this manner before. Should I be reporting stuff like this to [[WP:ANB]]? [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 00:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
613916 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613915 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.256743680E09 +++$+++ This came up because your own conduct looked pretty abrasive, so [[WP:NAM]] seems appropriate, and please accept that other opinions about an issue can be legitimate. This seems to me to essentially be a [[WP:EQ]] issue, and if you really must report it elsewhere then [[WP:WQA]] would be more appropriate, but in my opinion the time would be better spent in improving the relevant articles. Thanks for the heads-up, having had a look at the issue under dispute I've commented there. . .  +++$+++ ::This came up because your own conduct looked pretty abrasive, so [[WP:NAM]] seems appropriate, and please accept that other opinions about an issue can be legitimate. This seems to me to essentially be a [[WP:EQ]] issue, and if you really must report it elsewhere then [[WP:WQA]] would be more appropriate, but in my opinion the time would be better spent in improving the relevant articles. Thanks for the heads-up, having had a look at the issue under dispute I've commented there. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 08:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
613917 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613916 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.256794200E09 +++$+++ I may have made the mistake early on in reacting to his earlier taunts in kind.  That was a mistake, that I think I've mostly avoided since then.  I'm really not used to such editors, I've found most to be constructive in the past. And I'd much rather spend my time improving the article, rather than to have to spend time defending what seems like a pretty obvious pass of [[WP:N]] in my mind. I still think this is better served at AfD, if it is really notability we are looking at here.  +++$+++ :::I may have made the mistake early on in reacting to his earlier taunts in kind.  That was a mistake, that I think I've mostly avoided since then.  I'm really not used to such editors, I've found most to be constructive in the past. And I'd much rather spend my time improving the article, rather than to have to spend time defending what seems like a pretty obvious pass of [[WP:N]] in my mind. I still think this is better served at AfD, if it is really notability we are looking at here. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 22:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
613918 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613917 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.256798700E09 +++$+++ Hrafn tends to be pretty forceful about policies such as [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NOTE]], and he also tends to have good judgement about them. In my opinion, last I looked, more in the way of reliable third party sources would be needed to survive AfD, and my recommendation would be a merge and redirect rather than just deleting the article. A merge and redirect leaves open the possibility of adding such sources to the main article, and then by agreement following [[WP:SUMMARY]] to split off the information into a suitably well supported article replacing the redirect. Better to put energies into finding those sources now rather than putting time into the AfD process, but that's just my opinion. . .  +++$+++ ::::Hrafn tends to be pretty forceful about policies such as [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NOTE]], and he also tends to have good judgement about them. In my opinion, last I looked, more in the way of reliable third party sources would be needed to survive AfD, and my recommendation would be a merge and redirect rather than just deleting the article. A merge and redirect leaves open the possibility of adding such sources to the main article, and then by agreement following [[WP:SUMMARY]] to split off the information into a suitably well supported article replacing the redirect. Better to put energies into finding those sources now rather than putting time into the AfD process, but that's just my opinion. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 23:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
613919 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613917 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.257248820E09 +++$+++ On the issue itself, you may well be right ... though it does seem bizarre that a well-published writer isn't notable, but 50,000 footballers with far less 3rd party sources and media references are ... I'm a little confused on what a reasonable source is.  There's reference after reference on him in the popular media (particularly the NY Times and Boston Globe), and a dozen or so in scholarly journals and published books, that I can find.  +++$+++ ::::On the issue itself, you may well be right ... though it does seem bizarre that a well-published writer isn't notable, but 50,000 footballers with far less 3rd party sources and media references are ... I'm a little confused on what a reasonable source is.  There's reference after reference on him in the popular media (particularly the NY Times and Boston Globe), and a dozen or so in scholarly journals and published books, that I can find. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 03:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
613920 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613919 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.257252240E09 +++$+++ Not \"shooting first, and asking questions later\"? '''ROFLMAO!''' I would strongly suggest that Nfitz review the edit summary of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Daniel_Greenberg&diff=prev&oldid=310534926 this edit], which (as far as I can remember) is our first interaction, in which he ''most emphatically'' came out shooting. That I would [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ADaniel_Greenberg&action=historysubmit&diff=310536769&oldid=299254451 shoot back], pointing out that he was shooting blanks (pun intended), is an entirely predictable consequence. I would strongly recommend that Nfitz remember the [[Ethic of reciprocity|Golden Rule]], and not himself come out shooting, if he does not want a similar response, or ''at the very least'' check out his ground first, to make sure his 'shots' have some validity. Opening gambits making wild accusations of violation of non-applicable guidelines ''do not'' endear him to his potential correspondents.  <font face=\"Antiqua, serif\">'' +++$+++ :::::Not "shooting first, and asking questions later"? '''ROFLMAO!''' I would strongly suggest that Nfitz review the edit summary of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Greenberg&diff=prev&oldid=310534926 this edit], which (as far as I can remember) is our first interaction, in which he ''most emphatically'' came out shooting. That I would [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ADaniel_Greenberg&action=historysubmit&diff=310536769&oldid=299254451 shoot back], pointing out that he was shooting blanks (pun intended), is an entirely predictable consequence. I would strongly recommend that Nfitz remember the [[Ethic of reciprocity|Golden Rule]], and not himself come out shooting, if he does not want a similar response, or ''at the very least'' check out his ground first, to make sure his 'shots' have some validity. Opening gambits making wild accusations of violation of non-applicable guidelines ''do not'' endear him to his potential correspondents.  <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub><sup>''('''[[M:Precisionism|P]]''')</sup></font> 04:44, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
613921 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613920 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.257292200E09 +++$+++ [[Just So Stories|Just so]], to both of you. Deriding or complaining about other editors is a waste of time, the way to retain an article of dubious notability is to provide [[WP:V|verification]] from reliable third party sources, not just a list of published books. Good luck to all, .  +++$+++ ::::::[[Just So Stories|Just so]], to both of you. Deriding or complaining about other editors is a waste of time, the way to retain an article of dubious notability is to provide [[WP:V|verification]] from reliable third party sources, not just a list of published books. Good luck to all, . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
613922 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613919 +++$+++ 2009-11-04 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.257326700E09 +++$+++ How there anything at all in my edit?  I simply restored the page, asserted notablity, and asked the user not to leave the page blank ... there was no ill will or intent in that; perhaps leaving it blank was not the correct WikiTerm.  I'd note however that the use of terms such as '''ROFLMAO!'''  is insulting, demeaning, bordering on a personal attack, and a violation of [[WP:CIVIL]]. [[User:Hrafn]] is the most consistently rude and uncivil editor I have ever encountered in this project!  As far as I'm concerned users that continually display such incivility are a liability to the project and should be permanently banned! Sorry to put this on your talk page Dave ... I'm not sure I've ever been WikiHounded before!  +++$+++ :::::How there anything at all in my edit?  I simply restored the page, asserted notablity, and asked the user not to leave the page blank ... there was no ill will or intent in that; perhaps leaving it blank was not the correct WikiTerm.  I'd note however that the use of terms such as '''ROFLMAO!'''  is insulting, demeaning, bordering on a personal attack, and a violation of [[WP:CIVIL]]. [[User:Hrafn]] is the most consistently rude and uncivil editor I have ever encountered in this project!  As far as I'm concerned users that continually display such incivility are a liability to the project and should be permanently banned! Sorry to put this on your talk page Dave ... I'm not sure I've ever been WikiHounded before! [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 01:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
613923 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613908 +++$+++ 613922 +++$+++ 2009-11-04 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.257357060E09 +++$+++ I get the impression that neither of you realises how much you're upsetting the other, and in trying to express that you're both making the relationship worse rather than better. Agree that ROFLMAO is impolite and better not said, but note that WP:CIVIL also requires \"Do not ignore the positions and conclusions of others.\" Dismissing legitimate concerns as wikilawyering is also impolite, and while Hrafn was perhaps expressing undue scepticism when commenting about the improbability of a sudden burst of progress after four years of inadequate evidence of notability, Nfitz seems to me to have been attacking in response, and persisting in bare assertions of notability without putting forward sourced evidence to convince other editors. Note the plural. If the article is to be kept separate rather than merged into the school article, the issue should be resolved on the relevant article talk pages on the basis of evidence demonstrating independent notability: last I looked that evidence appeared to be lacking, and that should be the focus of attention of those wanting to keep a separate bio. Hrafn is entitled to critically examine claims in relation to agreed guidelines and policies, that in itself should not be taken as an attack. Doing so politely with a conscious effort to avoid any sarcasm, intended or not, should help to improve relationships rather than diverting into arguments about the person rather the article. Which is what caught my attention in the first place. . .  +++$+++ ::::::I get the impression that neither of you realises how much you're upsetting the other, and in trying to express that you're both making the relationship worse rather than better. Agree that ROFLMAO is impolite and better not said, but note that WP:CIVIL also requires "Do not ignore the positions and conclusions of others." Dismissing legitimate concerns as wikilawyering is also impolite, and while Hrafn was perhaps expressing undue scepticism when commenting about the improbability of a sudden burst of progress after four years of inadequate evidence of notability, Nfitz seems to me to have been attacking in response, and persisting in bare assertions of notability without putting forward sourced evidence to convince other editors. Note the plural. If the article is to be kept separate rather than merged into the school article, the issue should be resolved on the relevant article talk pages on the basis of evidence demonstrating independent notability: last I looked that evidence appeared to be lacking, and that should be the focus of attention of those wanting to keep a separate bio. Hrafn is entitled to critically examine claims in relation to agreed guidelines and policies, that in itself should not be taken as an attack. Doing so politely with a conscious effort to avoid any sarcasm, intended or not, should help to improve relationships rather than diverting into arguments about the person rather the article. Which is what caught my attention in the first place. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

537724 +++$+++ Philhellenism +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-08 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.173357240E09 +++$+++ ''' +++$+++ '''[[User:Philhellenism|<font color="black">Φil</font>]][[User talk:Philhellenism|<font color="#eecc00">hellenism</font>]]''' 04:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
537725 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537724 +++$+++ 537724 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.173382800E09 +++$+++ Well, it sure is better, even if the reliability problem remains.-- +++$+++ :Well, it sure is better, even if the reliability problem remains.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 11:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

275582 +++$+++ Carlo Colussi +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.190319600E09 +++$+++ Hello. You've asked why Borg didn't enter the Australian Open after 1974. I've made some modifications in the [[Australian Open]] article (tennis) to explain that this tournament became really important and deserved the \"Grand Slam tournament\" only in 1969, 1971 and from 1983 (see paragraph \"History\"). If you want other explications about the greatest tennis events, from a sporting view, since 1950 you can read my paragraph \"Slam tournaments at the beginning of the open era\", the 29th in [[Talk:World number one male tennis player rankings]] with some disagreements by others as jeffreyneave, german friend and SgtJohn.  +++$+++ Hello. You've asked why Borg didn't enter the Australian Open after 1974. I've made some modifications in the [[Australian Open]] article (tennis) to explain that this tournament became really important and deserved the "Grand Slam tournament" only in 1969, 1971 and from 1983 (see paragraph "History"). If you want other explications about the greatest tennis events, from a sporting view, since 1950 you can read my paragraph "Slam tournaments at the beginning of the open era", the 29th in [[Talk:World number one male tennis player rankings]] with some disagreements by others as jeffreyneave, german friend and SgtJohn. [[User:Carlo Colussi|Carlo Colussi]] 13:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
275583 +++$+++ Carlo Colussi +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275582 +++$+++ 275582 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.190381100E09 +++$+++ In conclusion almost no great champions entered this tournament in the 70s : Connors twice, Borg once, Mac never before 83 and Nastase only once in 1981 at ... 35 years old.  +++$+++ *In conclusion almost no great champions entered this tournament in the 70s : Connors twice, Borg once, Mac never before 83 and Nastase only once in 1981 at ... 35 years old. [[User:Carlo Colussi|Carlo Colussi]] 06:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

482837 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-21 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.182447600E09 +++$+++ Dear Wknight94, you recent renaming of articles regarding churches in Amsterdam is understandable in light of [[WP:UE]], but for some these, the new name is not an accurate translation of the actual Dutch name. IMO [[North Church]] should be [[Northern Church (Amsterdam)]], [[South Church]] should be [[Southern Church (Amsterdam)]], [[West Church]] should be [[Western Church (Amsterdam)]], and [[East Church]] should be [[Eastern Church (Amsterdam)]]. These are also the English-language names given in the body of the article. Could you please rename these articles? Thanks in advance,  +++$+++ Dear Wknight94, you recent renaming of articles regarding churches in Amsterdam is understandable in light of [[WP:UE]], but for some these, the new name is not an accurate translation of the actual Dutch name. IMO [[North Church]] should be [[Northern Church (Amsterdam)]], [[South Church]] should be [[Southern Church (Amsterdam)]], [[West Church]] should be [[Western Church (Amsterdam)]], and [[East Church]] should be [[Eastern Church (Amsterdam)]]. These are also the English-language names given in the body of the article. Could you please rename these articles? Thanks in advance, [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 10:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
482838 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482837 +++$+++ 482837 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.182448500E09 +++$+++ I considered this but a Google search does not support it.  A search for [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&rls=HPIB%2CHPIB%3A2006-21%2CHPIB%3Aen&q=%22South+Church%22+Amsterdam \"South Church\" Amsterdam] gives 15,500 hits while a search for [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=HPIB,HPIB:2006-21,HPIB:en&q=%22Southern+Church%22+Amsterdam \"Southern Church\" Amsterdam] gives only 450.  Similar comparisons for the other churches gives similar results.  When I took an English-language tour in Amsterdam, the churches were all called North Church, South Church, East Church and West Church, ''not'' Northern Church, Southern Church, Eastern Church, and Western Church.  \u2014 +++$+++ :I considered this but a Google search does not support it.  A search for [http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&rls=HPIB%2CHPIB%3A2006-21%2CHPIB%3Aen&q=%22South+Church%22+Amsterdam "South Church" Amsterdam] gives 15,500 hits while a search for [http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=HPIB,HPIB:2006-21,HPIB:en&q=%22Southern+Church%22+Amsterdam "Southern Church" Amsterdam] gives only 450.  Similar comparisons for the other churches gives similar results.  When I took an English-language tour in Amsterdam, the churches were all called North Church, South Church, East Church and West Church, ''not'' Northern Church, Southern Church, Eastern Church, and Western Church.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 10:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
482839 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482837 +++$+++ 482838 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.182451920E09 +++$+++ That begs the question: is the proper English equivalent the most commonly used translation or the correct translation? I honestly think the latter. I am fluent in both Dutch and English so please believe me, ''Northern'' rather than ''North'' is correct. \"North Church\" would be ''Noordkerk''. Thanks,  +++$+++ :: That begs the question: is the proper English equivalent the most commonly used translation or the correct translation? I honestly think the latter. I am fluent in both Dutch and English so please believe me, ''Northern'' rather than ''North'' is correct. "North Church" would be ''Noordkerk''. Thanks, [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 11:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
482840 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482837 +++$+++ 482839 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.182455880E09 +++$+++ That level of detail is probably worth a [[WP:RM]].  \u2014 +++$+++ :::That level of detail is probably worth a [[WP:RM]].  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 12:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

275584 +++$+++ MartinBot +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275584 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-30 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.191200820E09 +++$+++ Your recent edit to [[:Joe Bugner]] ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Joe_Bugner&diff=161358139&oldid=159391790 diff]) was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair [[Wikipedia:vandalism|vandalism]] to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies \u2013 if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]]. '''[[User:Tawkerbot2\/FAQ|Click here]]''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. <!-- Template:Test1 (First level warning \/ Tawkerbot2 autowarn version) -->  \/\/  +++$+++ Your recent edit to [[:Joe Bugner]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Bugner&diff=161358139&oldid=159391790 diff]) was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair [[Wikipedia:vandalism|vandalism]] to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]]. '''[[User:Tawkerbot2/FAQ|Click here]]''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. <!-- Template:Test1 (First level warning / Tawkerbot2 autowarn version) -->  // [[User:MartinBot|MartinBot]] 18:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
275585 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275584 +++$+++ 275584 +++$+++ 2007-09-30 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.191201360E09 +++$+++ Erroneous revert reported [[User:AntiVandalBot\/diffs#False positive - Joe Bugner|here]].  +++$+++ :Erroneous revert reported [[User:AntiVandalBot/diffs#False positive - Joe Bugner|here]]. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 18:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

537729 +++$+++ Picaroon9288 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537729 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.173607440E09 +++$+++ Does the last bit, \"risking escaltion of the conflict,\" refer to the French counterattack, or the method that Habr\xe9 desired the French to have used? Or, to phrase my question differently, which of those two things is the one which risked escalation? Right now, the sentence is ambiguous in that regard, but I can't split it in two because I'm not sure what all of it means. Could you clarify that bit?  +++$+++ Does the last bit, "risking escaltion of the conflict," refer to the French counterattack, or the method that Habré desired the French to have used? Or, to phrase my question differently, which of those two things is the one which risked escalation? Right now, the sentence is ambiguous in that regard, but I can't split it in two because I'm not sure what all of it means. Could you clarify that bit? [[User talk:Picaroon9288|Picaroon]] 03:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
537730 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537729 +++$+++ 537729 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.173672840E09 +++$+++ Thanks a milion for your new copyedit; if I gave you a dime for every time you've helped me, I'd be thrown in jail for debts! ;-) I've tried rewriting the passage, by expanding it: is it clearer now?-- +++$+++ :Thanks a milion for your new copyedit; if I gave you a dime for every time you've helped me, I'd be thrown in jail for debts! ;-) I've tried rewriting the passage, by expanding it: is it clearer now?--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:14, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

13442 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.311905700E09 +++$+++ Hmm..I think I'm done with Finn's \"Casting and creation\" section for now. I think we should leave the information about his departure there, but maybe throw in some stuff about news erupting about the three of them possibly staying? This show changes it's mind at the drop of the hat. Haha.  +++$+++ Hmm..I think I'm done with Finn's "Casting and creation" section for now. I think we should leave the information about his departure there, but maybe throw in some stuff about news erupting about the three of them possibly staying? This show changes it's mind at the drop of the hat. Haha. [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 19:15, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
13443 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311906300E09 +++$+++ You don't know what you've unleashed, Frickative; here comes yet another strand. ;-) I've just done some clean-up at the [[Adam Anders]] page, and noticed that the person who created the page may not understand the notion of archiving in references. Virtually all the references have an \"archive\" component, but they appear to be the same URL as the original. Can either of you take a quick look and confirm? I can do the remaining work; I already updated a couple of them, but decided I should wait for confirmation that archiving is something else (like is done with the weekly music charts for some of the discography refs, since the full charts frequently aren't available after the original week). And another question: I noticed an edit being reverted the other day because Amazon was being used as a source for a DVD release date. Is Amazon not considered adequate, or only not adequate for certain circumstances? I know I've seen it being used for release dates and for track lists elsewhere (indeed, for DVD in question, though on another page); should this be enforced more broadly? Finally, I alphabetized the main ''Glee'' template and added back ''[[Don't Stop Believing]]'', that British show that attempted to cash in on the show's success by setting up a \"reality-TV\" show-choir competition; it had gotten converted into a link to the iconic the Journey song's article.  +++$+++ :You don't know what you've unleashed, Frickative; here comes yet another strand. ;-) I've just done some clean-up at the [[Adam Anders]] page, and noticed that the person who created the page may not understand the notion of archiving in references. Virtually all the references have an "archive" component, but they appear to be the same URL as the original. Can either of you take a quick look and confirm? I can do the remaining work; I already updated a couple of them, but decided I should wait for confirmation that archiving is something else (like is done with the weekly music charts for some of the discography refs, since the full charts frequently aren't available after the original week). And another question: I noticed an edit being reverted the other day because Amazon was being used as a source for a DVD release date. Is Amazon not considered adequate, or only not adequate for certain circumstances? I know I've seen it being used for release dates and for track lists elsewhere (indeed, for DVD in question, though on another page); should this be enforced more broadly? Finally, I alphabetized the main ''Glee'' template and added back ''[[Don't Stop Believing]]'', that British show that attempted to cash in on the show's success by setting up a "reality-TV" show-choir competition; it had gotten converted into a link to the iconic the Journey song's article. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 19:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
13444 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13443 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.311983220E09 +++$+++ You're spot-on about archiving - it tends to be done most often for pages that don't have static content, though it is generally good practice to help prevent [[WP:LINKROT|linkrot]], and is indeed a separate URL. The site I use to archive pages is webcitation.org, though there may be others. I think the best thing to do here is just remove all the parameters with duplicate URLs. Hm, that's the first I've heard about Amazon not being an acceptable source - I'm sure I used it several times to cite DVD release dates in [[Glee (season 1)]], which wasn't flagged up as problematic at its [[WP:FL|FL]] review. Probably best to check with the editor who reverted, in case there's been a recent guideline change. And good stuff with the template :) \"Don't Stop Believing\" was truly dire - I had hoped to work it up to GA at some point, but even the show's website has been pulled now, so most of the sources are defunct (a good case in favour of archiving!).  +++$+++ ::You're spot-on about archiving - it tends to be done most often for pages that don't have static content, though it is generally good practice to help prevent [[WP:LINKROT|linkrot]], and is indeed a separate URL. The site I use to archive pages is webcitation.org, though there may be others. I think the best thing to do here is just remove all the parameters with duplicate URLs. Hm, that's the first I've heard about Amazon not being an acceptable source - I'm sure I used it several times to cite DVD release dates in [[Glee (season 1)]], which wasn't flagged up as problematic at its [[WP:FL|FL]] review. Probably best to check with the editor who reverted, in case there's been a recent guideline change. And good stuff with the template :) "Don't Stop Believing" was truly dire - I had hoped to work it up to GA at some point, but even the show's website has been pulled now, so most of the sources are defunct (a good case in favour of archiving!). [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 16:47, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
13445 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13444 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312011960E09 +++$+++ Hmm, the more I consider it, the more I think there is enough material to base a spin-off article on. There are almost 500 GNews hits for [http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/search?aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=glee+graduate#q=glee+characters+graduate&hl=en&tbm=nws&ei=mU8zTvWaBImYOs7Jvf4L&start=90&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=4bdb9c942ca5f950&biw=1280&bih=687 Glee characters graduate] and over 200 for [http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=glee+spin+off#q=glee+spin+off&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=nws&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=4bdb9c942ca5f950&biw=1280&bih=687 Glee spin-off]. I don't know what it would be titled, but I'm concerned that documenting it all in the season 3 article may weigh that page down with pre-production drama. Another couple of days and I'll be free to play about with it and see if it's worth pursuing. (I've also been toying with the idea of a character article for Holly Holliday, not to mention collabing on Santana and finally finishing off a lot of the s2 episode articles. Geeze, I think I've spent more time talking about ''Glee'' articles this summer than I have actually writing them!)  +++$+++ :::Hmm, the more I consider it, the more I think there is enough material to base a spin-off article on. There are almost 500 GNews hits for [http://www.google.co.uk/search?aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=glee+graduate#q=glee+characters+graduate&hl=en&tbm=nws&ei=mU8zTvWaBImYOs7Jvf4L&start=90&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=4bdb9c942ca5f950&biw=1280&bih=687 Glee characters graduate] and over 200 for [http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=glee+spin+off#q=glee+spin+off&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=nws&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=4bdb9c942ca5f950&biw=1280&bih=687 Glee spin-off]. I don't know what it would be titled, but I'm concerned that documenting it all in the season 3 article may weigh that page down with pre-production drama. Another couple of days and I'll be free to play about with it and see if it's worth pursuing. (I've also been toying with the idea of a character article for Holly Holliday, not to mention collabing on Santana and finally finishing off a lot of the s2 episode articles. Geeze, I think I've spent more time talking about ''Glee'' articles this summer than I have actually writing them!) [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 00:46, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
13446 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13445 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.312021980E09 +++$+++ I'm looking forward to seeing the \"finally finishing off a lot of the s2 episode articles\" part, myself. Only 10 of 22 are GAs, with half a dozen each of B and C for the remaining. (I think one of them contained mostly Candyo32 material that you were holding off on nominating without Candyo32's approval, but maybe you should go ahead since it's been many weeks.) I know for creating new material, what's most interesting will get done more quickly\u2014look at me and storyline creations and updates\u2014but I think there's going to be a lot more noise about the pre-production stuff over the next couple of weeks until the cast reports on August 10, and the movie is released on August 12. After August 10, we'll start getting stories about new cast members, and more details on returning recurring ones, which I imagine will keep us hopping. In the meantime, I've updated the Anders article to eliminate the not-really-archive URLs, and also got rid of some duplicate full references; ref names are wonderful things...  +++$+++ ::::I'm looking forward to seeing the "finally finishing off a lot of the s2 episode articles" part, myself. Only 10 of 22 are GAs, with half a dozen each of B and C for the remaining. (I think one of them contained mostly Candyo32 material that you were holding off on nominating without Candyo32's approval, but maybe you should go ahead since it's been many weeks.) I know for creating new material, what's most interesting will get done more quickly—look at me and storyline creations and updates—but I think there's going to be a lot more noise about the pre-production stuff over the next couple of weeks until the cast reports on August 10, and the movie is released on August 12. After August 10, we'll start getting stories about new cast members, and more details on returning recurring ones, which I imagine will keep us hopping. In the meantime, I've updated the Anders article to eliminate the not-really-archive URLs, and also got rid of some duplicate full references; ref names are wonderful things... [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
13447 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13445 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.312028040E09 +++$+++ And speaking of the season two episode articles, I think I've found my next project: doing a new pass on the storylines for all 22 episodes. I was looking at a fix someone made to the \"[[A Very Glee Christmas]]\" storyline, and realized that the entire section was in rough shape. I think they can all use a review, even some of the GA articles.  +++$+++ ::::And speaking of the season two episode articles, I think I've found my next project: doing a new pass on the storylines for all 22 episodes. I was looking at a fix someone made to the "[[A Very Glee Christmas]]" storyline, and realized that the entire section was in rough shape. I think they can all use a review, even some of the GA articles. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 05:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
13448 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13445 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312028400E09 +++$+++ Just figured out that the article waiting on Candyo32 for GA was for the \"[[Comeback (Glee)|Comeback]]\" episode. Maybe it'll be the one that gets us halfway to 22 episodes...  +++$+++ ::::Just figured out that the article waiting on Candyo32 for GA was for the "[[Comeback (Glee)|Comeback]]" episode. Maybe it'll be the one that gets us halfway to 22 episodes... [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 05:20, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
13449 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13448 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.312035480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::[[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 07:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
13450 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13449 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.312056000E09 +++$+++ Wrt Holly, there's definitely already enough material to meet the [[WP:GNG]]. I was kind of waiting on the Emmy noms to decide whether to give it a go, and Paltrow was indeed nominated, but maybe I'll wait for the outcome of the awards and prioritise other tasks. And wow, RM really needs to just stop giving interviews, ever.  +++$+++ ::::::Wrt Holly, there's definitely already enough material to meet the [[WP:GNG]]. I was kind of waiting on the Emmy noms to decide whether to give it a go, and Paltrow was indeed nominated, but maybe I'll wait for the outcome of the awards and prioritise other tasks. And wow, RM really needs to just stop giving interviews, ever. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 13:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
13451 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13450 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.312081680E09 +++$+++ Did she get an Emmy-nom? I hadn't even realized when I looked at the nominees list some time ago. =\/ Well, if you ever feel like going through with that, let me know. HAHA at that last part. Ryan Murphy really needs to stop giving interviews, as he's confusing everybody. Oh, and now there's this [http:\/\/blog.chron.com\/celebritybuzz\/2011\/07\/ryan-murphy-scrapper-glee-spin-off-after-firing-controversy\/]  +++$+++ :::::::Did she get an Emmy-nom? I hadn't even realized when I looked at the nominees list some time ago. =/ Well, if you ever feel like going through with that, let me know. HAHA at that last part. Ryan Murphy really needs to stop giving interviews, as he's confusing everybody. Oh, and now there's this [http://blog.chron.com/celebritybuzz/2011/07/ryan-murphy-scrapper-glee-spin-off-after-firing-controversy/] [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 20:08, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
13452 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13451 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312102200E09 +++$+++ BTW, I seem to have gotten into a reversion scrap in the [[Characters of Glee]] article about the photos, which JWHolland has removed in the case of five characters. My understanding was that all significant characters should have a picture of the actor on the Characters page; JW seems to be under the impression that a picture is only needed if the character doesn't have a page with a picture on it there. (Though that logic would militate against retaining the Morrison\/Lynch photo, and it still remains.) I have no particular attachment to the photos, but there's been a great deal of editing around them over the months, so I'd hate to see them deleted if they truly belong. Thoughts?  +++$+++ ::::::::BTW, I seem to have gotten into a reversion scrap in the [[Characters of Glee]] article about the photos, which JWHolland has removed in the case of five characters. My understanding was that all significant characters should have a picture of the actor on the Characters page; JW seems to be under the impression that a picture is only needed if the character doesn't have a page with a picture on it there. (Though that logic would militate against retaining the Morrison/Lynch photo, and it still remains.) I have no particular attachment to the photos, but there's been a great deal of editing around them over the months, so I'd hate to see them deleted if they truly belong. Thoughts? [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
13453 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13452 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312185360E09 +++$+++ On an unrelated note, I forgot to mention before re: plot sections, something to watch out for is the recommended word limit. [[MOS:TV]] says no more than 500 words per episode unless it's a convoluted storyline, and the general rule of thumb is about 100 words per 10 minutes of screen time, so most eps should hover around 450 :)  +++$+++ :::::::::On an unrelated note, I forgot to mention before re: plot sections, something to watch out for is the recommended word limit. [[MOS:TV]] says no more than 500 words per episode unless it's a convoluted storyline, and the general rule of thumb is about 100 words per 10 minutes of screen time, so most eps should hover around 450 :) [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 00:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13454 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13452 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.312185660E09 +++$+++ Oh, one more thing I forgot: have either of you read ''Glee: The Beginning'' or ''Glee: Foreign Exchange''? As they're official tie-in media, at some point we should probably look at turning the \"Storylines\" sections in the character articles into \"Appearances\", with subsections for \"Television\" and a few sentences on \"Literature\". I have the first book, it's just so exceptionally mediocre that I've never finished it...  +++$+++ :::::::::Oh, one more thing I forgot: have either of you read ''Glee: The Beginning'' or ''Glee: Foreign Exchange''? As they're official tie-in media, at some point we should probably look at turning the "Storylines" sections in the character articles into "Appearances", with subsections for "Television" and a few sentences on "Literature". I have the first book, it's just so exceptionally mediocre that I've never finished it... [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 01:01, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13455 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13454 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.312187100E09 +++$+++ As for the tie-in novels, I saw ''Glee: Summer Break'' and read the first couple of pages, but it was so wrong for end-of-season-two Rachel and disappointingly written that I put it right back down. I was really hoping for better quality work-for-hire; to dignify this with \"Literature\" seems so inapposite. However, I do wonder about including them on the character pages. Yes, these are authorized tie-ins, but that doesn't mean that they're considered \"canon\" as far as the show is concerned. As an example, even thought the hundreds of ''Star Trek'' novels across many shows and movies are authorized, none of the events in them are considered official by Paramount, nor the characterizations. Even portions of the movie novelizations that stray from the script, or include sections that were cut from the final movie. There's a chance that something might cross-pollinate, such as when Vonda McIntyre's coining of \"Hikaru\" for Sulu's first name made it into the official canon, but these are rare. My take would be that these are extensions\u2014extra stories, as it were\u2014but none of the details will affect in the slightest any characterization going forward, nor will they be added to the show's bible.  +++$+++ ::::::::::As for the tie-in novels, I saw ''Glee: Summer Break'' and read the first couple of pages, but it was so wrong for end-of-season-two Rachel and disappointingly written that I put it right back down. I was really hoping for better quality work-for-hire; to dignify this with "Literature" seems so inapposite. However, I do wonder about including them on the character pages. Yes, these are authorized tie-ins, but that doesn't mean that they're considered "canon" as far as the show is concerned. As an example, even thought the hundreds of ''Star Trek'' novels across many shows and movies are authorized, none of the events in them are considered official by Paramount, nor the characterizations. Even portions of the movie novelizations that stray from the script, or include sections that were cut from the final movie. There's a chance that something might cross-pollinate, such as when Vonda McIntyre's coining of "Hikaru" for Sulu's first name made it into the official canon, but these are rare. My take would be that these are extensions—extra stories, as it were—but none of the details will affect in the slightest any characterization going forward, nor will they be added to the show's bible. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:25, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13456 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13454 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.312192800E09 +++$+++ PS: [[User_talk:Bovineboy2008|Bovineboy2008]] answered my questions about Amazon in [[User_talk:Bovineboy2008#Citing_Amazon|this thread]].  +++$+++ ::::::::::PS: [[User_talk:Bovineboy2008|Bovineboy2008]] answered my questions about Amazon in [[User_talk:Bovineboy2008#Citing_Amazon|this thread]]. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13457 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13442 +++$+++ 13456 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.312223160E09 +++$+++ Bovineboy raises good points on Amazon, and there are certainly ways we can work around it for US\/Canadian releases - tvshowsondvd.com is a good resource for release dates and special features, and of course the album\/EP releases are always accompanied by an official Fox press release. However, I can't think of a work-around for international releases, where no such announcements are made and relying on retailers is the only means of attaining a date. If it comes down to using Amazon-or-similar or omitting major international releases, I assume the former would be preferred. I specifically remember being asked to include, for instance, the New Zealand, Ireland and South Africa release dates for the season 1 DVDs in that article, and could only do so by using retailers based in those countries. I guess as long as we use such sites conservatively and prioritize other sources where available (perhaps some region-specific reviews might note release dates?), that'll have to suffice.  +++$+++ :::::::::::Bovineboy raises good points on Amazon, and there are certainly ways we can work around it for US/Canadian releases - tvshowsondvd.com is a good resource for release dates and special features, and of course the album/EP releases are always accompanied by an official Fox press release. However, I can't think of a work-around for international releases, where no such announcements are made and relying on retailers is the only means of attaining a date. If it comes down to using Amazon-or-similar or omitting major international releases, I assume the former would be preferred. I specifically remember being asked to include, for instance, the New Zealand, Ireland and South Africa release dates for the season 1 DVDs in that article, and could only do so by using retailers based in those countries. I guess as long as we use such sites conservatively and prioritize other sources where available (perhaps some region-specific reviews might note release dates?), that'll have to suffice. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 11:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

439147 +++$+++ Esprit15d +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-04 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.212564840E09 +++$+++ Your understanding of WP policy is dead on (at least as I understand it).  Did my comment at the talk page indicate that I felt otherwise?--Esprit15d \u2022 <small> +++$+++ Your understanding of WP policy is dead on (at least as I understand it).  Did my comment at the talk page indicate that I felt otherwise?--Esprit15d • <small>[[User_talk:Esprit15d |talk]]</small> • <small>[[Special:Contributions/Esprit15d|contribs]]</small> 00:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
439148 +++$+++ Esprit15d +++$+++ Dpbsmith +++$+++ 439147 +++$+++ 439147 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.212612420E09 +++$+++ I can see how my comments seemed like I was saying the info could never be included. Lack of reliable published sources is the only problem, I agree.--Esprit15d \u2022 <small> +++$+++ :I can see how my comments seemed like I was saying the info could never be included. Lack of reliable published sources is the only problem, I agree.--Esprit15d • <small>[[User_talk:Esprit15d |talk]]</small> • <small>[[Special:Contributions/Esprit15d|contribs]]</small> 13:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

537734 +++$+++ GiorgioOrsini +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537734 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.173581100E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:GiorgioOrsini|Giorgio Orsini]] 18:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
537735 +++$+++ GiorgioOrsini +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537734 +++$+++ 537734 +++$+++ 2007-03-14 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.173858900E09 +++$+++ This is the second time that you are removing a public warning from your talk page. As an administrator - you shall know that it is an act of vandalism-- +++$+++ :This is the second time that you are removing a public warning from your talk page. As an administrator - you shall know that it is an act of vandalism--[[User:GiorgioOrsini|Giorgio Orsini]] 00:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
537736 +++$+++ Picaroon9288 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537734 +++$+++ 537735 +++$+++ 2007-03-14 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.173859740E09 +++$+++ I'd say his calling your revert warring \"boring\" is a minor injustice compared to the fact that you're harassing him by reposting things he's already removed from his talk page and generally getting on his nerves. With regards to your claim of \"vandalism,\" Aldux didn't commit any vandalism - you, however, are over the line when it comes to disruption. Don't post here again unless he asks you to, and I'm sure he'll be happy to extend you the same courtesy. Bye now.  +++$+++ ::I'd say his calling your revert warring "boring" is a minor injustice compared to the fact that you're harassing him by reposting things he's already removed from his talk page and generally getting on his nerves. With regards to your claim of "vandalism," Aldux didn't commit any vandalism - you, however, are over the line when it comes to disruption. Don't post here again unless he asks you to, and I'm sure he'll be happy to extend you the same courtesy. Bye now. [[User talk:Picaroon9288|Picaroon]] 01:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

537737 +++$+++ Orpheus +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-14 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.173911700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Orpheus|Orpheus]] 15:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
537738 +++$+++ Abecedare +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537737 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.174369800E09 +++$+++ Randomatom001, especially is active on numerous pages and has uploaded various images which are copyright violations (with the incorrect declaration that they are either posters of events or <s>PD<\/s> false Fair Use justification). Several editors have been busy cleaning up after him. Some of the discussion about him is at [[User_talk:Abecedare#Socks]]. Can you take a look ?  +++$+++ :: Randomatom001, especially is active on numerous pages and has uploaded various images which are copyright violations (with the incorrect declaration that they are either posters of events or <s>PD</s> false Fair Use justification). Several editors have been busy cleaning up after him. Some of the discussion about him is at [[User_talk:Abecedare#Socks]]. Can you take a look ? [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] 22:50, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

275594 +++$+++ Qwghlm +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275594 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-17 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.195350420E09 +++$+++ Hi Steve - {{user|Stocky37}} has been making what I'm 99% sure are hoax Chelsea-related articles, but I'd appreciate you double-checking for me. In any case you might want to be aware of their edits...  +++$+++ Hi Steve - {{user|Stocky37}} has been making what I'm 99% sure are hoax Chelsea-related articles, but I'd appreciate you double-checking for me. In any case you might want to be aware of their edits... [[User:Qwghlm|Qwghlm]] ([[User talk:Qwghlm|talk]]) 17:47, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
275595 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275594 +++$+++ 275594 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.195716480E09 +++$+++ Yes.  +++$+++ :Yes. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] ([[User talk:SteveO|talk]]) 23:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
275596 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275594 +++$+++ 275594 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.196461680E09 +++$+++ Thankfully not.  +++$+++ :Thankfully not. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] 14:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
275597 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275594 +++$+++ 275594 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.196287080E09 +++$+++ The incident with the doorman is covered above, but all of the other claims were unsourced. Per Wikipedia's policy on [[WP:BLP|biographies of living people]], all negative, unsourced material should be removed immediately. Additionally, adding your own personal commentary to an article about an individual is not appropriate.  +++$+++ :The incident with the doorman is covered above, but all of the other claims were unsourced. Per Wikipedia's policy on [[WP:BLP|biographies of living people]], all negative, unsourced material should be removed immediately. Additionally, adding your own personal commentary to an article about an individual is not appropriate. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] ([[User talk:SteveO|talk]]) 13:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

537739 +++$+++ Abecedare +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.174525500E09 +++$+++ Yes, I realized that you were busy with \"real life\". Initially even I wasn't sure if Randomatom001 was a sock of Maleabroad, but his more recent edit summmaries and POV pushing on \"Buddha being an avatar of ...\" convinced me eventually. However, as you say, it is best for a checkuser to confirm the suspicion. A range block, if feasible, is direly needed - currently a new sock [[User:Algorithm1]] is on a rampage recreating deleted articles, blanking other socks' pages etc, and even with 3-4 editors cleaning up after him, it gets tiresome after a while. If you have the time can you please delete these copyvio and wrongly tagged images: [[:Image:Holyland.jpg]], [[:Image:Punyabhumi.jpg]] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Randomatom001 these]. Thanks.  +++$+++ Yes, I realized that you were busy with "real life". Initially even I wasn't sure if Randomatom001 was a sock of Maleabroad, but his more recent edit summmaries and POV pushing on "Buddha being an avatar of ..." convinced me eventually. However, as you say, it is best for a checkuser to confirm the suspicion. A range block, if feasible, is direly needed - currently a new sock [[User:Algorithm1]] is on a rampage recreating deleted articles, blanking other socks' pages etc, and even with 3-4 editors cleaning up after him, it gets tiresome after a while. If you have the time can you please delete these copyvio and wrongly tagged images: [[:Image:Holyland.jpg]], [[:Image:Punyabhumi.jpg]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Randomatom001 these]. Thanks. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] 18:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
537740 +++$+++ Abecedare +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537739 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.174541280E09 +++$+++ Checkuser confirmed the socks (all except [[User:Omkar y]]; mea culpa since I don't recall why I added him to the list - his contribs. look unrelated). Maleabroad apparently edits from U. Calgary, Canada (\"pc127.geog.lab.acs.ucalgary.ca\" in one case), so IP range block is perhaps infeasible. Is there any  other solution besides dealing with each sock individually ? Anyway, could you please block the known socks and delete the uploaded images (I think [[WP:CSD#G5]] would now apply) ? I hope its OK to lay all this work at your doorstep - I would be happy to place these requests at the admin noticeboards otherwise. Thanks.  +++$+++ :: Checkuser confirmed the socks (all except [[User:Omkar y]]; mea culpa since I don't recall why I added him to the list - his contribs. look unrelated). Maleabroad apparently edits from U. Calgary, Canada ("pc127.geog.lab.acs.ucalgary.ca" in one case), so IP range block is perhaps infeasible. Is there any  other solution besides dealing with each sock individually ? Anyway, could you please block the known socks and delete the uploaded images (I think [[WP:CSD#G5]] would now apply) ? I hope its OK to lay all this work at your doorstep - I would be happy to place these requests at the admin noticeboards otherwise. Thanks. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] 22:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

537743 +++$+++ Domitius +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-18 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.174260120E09 +++$+++ The original English title was [[Tenedos]], not [[Tenedhos]]. The latter is a transcription of the Greek name. I hope you don't mind my going the long (i.e. non administrative) way of changing it [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tenedos&action=history].-- +++$+++ The original English title was [[Tenedos]], not [[Tenedhos]]. The latter is a transcription of the Greek name. I hope you don't mind my going the long (i.e. non administrative) way of changing it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tenedos&action=history].--[[User:Domitius|Domitius]] 16:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
537744 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537743 +++$+++ 537743 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.174260420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for correcting me, I hadn't noted my error.-- +++$+++ :Thanks for correcting me, I hadn't noted my error.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

537745 +++$+++ Domitius +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.174349100E09 +++$+++ Could you please have a word with {{userblock|Oguz1}}. He has been wikistalking me like crazy reverting things he obviously doesn't understand, for example [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Minorities_in_Greece&diff=prev&oldid=116293430 here] a link is reverted as POV (reasons unassigned), and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Transnistria&diff=prev&oldid=116294672 here] he restores a link I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Transnistria&diff=116071387&oldid=116069712 removed], but someone else later [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Transnistria&diff=prev&oldid=116073251 restored], so in effect what Oguz did was make the article have the same link twice! [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Persian_people&diff=prev&oldid=116292990 Here] he reverts my formatting of the infobox (an anon had incorrectly added some information which had been incorrectly formatted and wouldn't appear on the viewed page - I formatted it and Oguz reverted it to the damaged version, again reasons unassigned).-- +++$+++ Could you please have a word with {{userblock|Oguz1}}. He has been wikistalking me like crazy reverting things he obviously doesn't understand, for example [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Minorities_in_Greece&diff=prev&oldid=116293430 here] a link is reverted as POV (reasons unassigned), and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transnistria&diff=prev&oldid=116294672 here] he restores a link I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transnistria&diff=116071387&oldid=116069712 removed], but someone else later [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transnistria&diff=prev&oldid=116073251 restored], so in effect what Oguz did was make the article have the same link twice! [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Persian_people&diff=prev&oldid=116292990 Here] he reverts my formatting of the infobox (an anon had incorrectly added some information which had been incorrectly formatted and wouldn't appear on the viewed page - I formatted it and Oguz reverted it to the damaged version, again reasons unassigned).--[[User:Domitius|Domitius]] 17:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
537746 +++$+++ Oguz1 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.174350120E09 +++$+++ While you are at it, look at his contribs on Turkish Coffee, Doner, \u015eebinkarahisar, and others. He has deleted sourced info on some instances and replace it with biased and POV content on others (commercial websites, etc). Also, I would like to point out that most of the versions that he reverts to were orginally made by anon (the above mentioned pages). If you look at my reverts or edits, I have never made any contribution that is infammatory or POV. I have simply removed them for not having a credible source (such as on \u015eebinkarahisar) and commented as such. It may look like I am following him from this post, but I do have a right to express my side of the story.  -- +++$+++ :: While you are at it, look at his contribs on Turkish Coffee, Doner, Şebinkarahisar, and others. He has deleted sourced info on some instances and replace it with biased and POV content on others (commercial websites, etc). Also, I would like to point out that most of the versions that he reverts to were orginally made by anon (the above mentioned pages). If you look at my reverts or edits, I have never made any contribution that is infammatory or POV. I have simply removed them for not having a credible source (such as on Şebinkarahisar) and commented as such. It may look like I am following him from this post, but I do have a right to express my side of the story.  --[[User:Oguz1|Oguz1]] 17:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
537747 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537745 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.174351440E09 +++$+++ Honestly Oguz, I know aabsolutely nothing of your dispute with Domitius, but to say that some of your edits smell of a revenge for previous edits by Domitius is an understatement, especially when one makes an edit summary like this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Transnistria&diff=116294672&oldid=116073251]; and this one is utterly inexplicable [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Minorities_in_Greece&diff=prev&oldid=116293430], and does make wonder if this isn't a clear case of [[WP:STALK]]. For this I really feel you should cut it immediately, because the rules are prettly clear that this sort of behaviour is not acceptable.-- +++$+++ ::: Honestly Oguz, I know aabsolutely nothing of your dispute with Domitius, but to say that some of your edits smell of a revenge for previous edits by Domitius is an understatement, especially when one makes an edit summary like this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transnistria&diff=116294672&oldid=116073251]; and this one is utterly inexplicable [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Minorities_in_Greece&diff=prev&oldid=116293430], and does make wonder if this isn't a clear case of [[WP:STALK]]. For this I really feel you should cut it immediately, because the rules are prettly clear that this sort of behaviour is not acceptable.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 17:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

13458 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13458 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.312281060E09 +++$+++ {{outdent}} This is completely off-topic, but [[Kurt Hummel]] got a second peer review today. There are a few easy fixes I can do, but I was wondering if either yourself of BlueMoonset would be interested in helping out with it if you have time.  +++$+++ {{outdent}} This is completely off-topic, but [[Kurt Hummel]] got a second peer review today. There are a few easy fixes I can do, but I was wondering if either yourself of BlueMoonset would be interested in helping out with it if you have time. [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 03:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13459 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13458 +++$+++ 13458 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.312282320E09 +++$+++ If there's anything I ''can'' help with then I'm more than happy to - my concern is that if multiple copy-editors from the GOCE have been over it and the prose is ''still'' being flagged up as problematic, I could end up making it worse, rather than better =\/. I'd never seen the [[WP:PR\/V]] link before though, and I was about to suggest contacting someone from the copyediting list there, when I noticed  +++$+++ :If there's anything I ''can'' help with then I'm more than happy to - my concern is that if multiple copy-editors from the GOCE have been over it and the prose is ''still'' being flagged up as problematic, I could end up making it worse, rather than better =/. I'd never seen the [[WP:PR/V]] link before though, and I was about to suggest contacting someone from the copyediting list there, when I noticed [[User:Bejinhan]] is down for "Major copyediting". She's a member of WP:GLEE, and last autumn, she put together the [[Book:Season 1 of Glee|season one book]]. I think it'd definitely be worthwhile asking if she'd be willing to go over it. :) [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 03:52, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13460 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13458 +++$+++ 13459 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.312285860E09 +++$+++ Okay! Good idea. I'll go pop her a quick message and see if she's interested. You and I have put quite a significant amount of work into [[Kurt Hummel]] and I'm determined to see it reach the status of being the \"best quality produced on Wikipedia\". Haha. Also, completely off topic again but have you given more thought to creating an article for Holly?   +++$+++ ::Okay! Good idea. I'll go pop her a quick message and see if she's interested. You and I have put quite a significant amount of work into [[Kurt Hummel]] and I'm determined to see it reach the status of being the "best quality produced on Wikipedia". Haha. Also, completely off topic again but have you given more thought to creating an article for Holly?  [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 04:51, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13461 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13458 +++$+++ 13460 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.312288200E09 +++$+++ I thought Frickative's idea was a good one, too. I could probably handle a number of the changes requested on the review, though I'm uneven when it comes to spotting passive voice (or avoiding it myself), but was really puzzled by the request to go for past tense, when I thought character articles were supposed to be relentlessly in the present.  +++$+++ :::I thought Frickative's idea was a good one, too. I could probably handle a number of the changes requested on the review, though I'm uneven when it comes to spotting passive voice (or avoiding it myself), but was really puzzled by the request to go for past tense, when I thought character articles were supposed to be relentlessly in the present. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 05:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13462 +++$+++ HorrorFan121 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13458 +++$+++ 13461 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.312289880E09 +++$+++ That would be great if you could look over some of the necessary changes! The reviewer was wrong on the second part though. The [[WP:MOS]] dictates that all fictional character plot lines are strictly to be written in the present tense. He might just be unfamiliar with writing about fictional characters.  +++$+++ ::::That would be great if you could look over some of the necessary changes! The reviewer was wrong on the second part though. The [[WP:MOS]] dictates that all fictional character plot lines are strictly to be written in the present tense. He might just be unfamiliar with writing about fictional characters. [[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 05:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13463 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13458 +++$+++ 13462 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.312312320E09 +++$+++ Re: Holly, I've started a sandbox [[User:Frickative\/Holly Holliday|here]] in case the mood strikes me to work on it (and one  +++$+++ :::::Re: Holly, I've started a sandbox [[User:Frickative/Holly Holliday|here]] in case the mood strikes me to work on it (and one [[User:Frickative/Glee spin-off|here]] for the "spin-off"). I'm probably going to concentrate on the articles for "Duets" and the 3D movie today, but I might start putting together an easy section like "Musical performances" in-between. Annoyingly, after tons of searching, I've finally found a [http://www.goldderby.com/emmys/news/1734/emmy-showdown-who-will-win-battle-for-best-comedy-guest-actress-%5Bvideo%5D.html reliable source] for the episodes the guest actresses submitted for Emmy consideration... and the site's down. Argh. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 12:12, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13464 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13458 +++$+++ 13463 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.312365420E09 +++$+++ Before the section split here, I started a new section on HorrorFan121's own talk page about the Kurt Hummel edits, since they had gotten a bit buried. The conversation is continuing [[User talk:HorrorFan121#Kurt_Hummel_page_copyedit|there]], Frickative; I wanted to be sure you knew the new location. (I actually rather like this: conversations on both of your talk pages and my talk page about various articles in the ''Glee'' project.)  +++$+++ ::::::Before the section split here, I started a new section on HorrorFan121's own talk page about the Kurt Hummel edits, since they had gotten a bit buried. The conversation is continuing [[User talk:HorrorFan121#Kurt_Hummel_page_copyedit|there]], Frickative; I wanted to be sure you knew the new location. (I actually rather like this: conversations on both of your talk pages and my talk page about various articles in the ''Glee'' project.) [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 02:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
13465 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13458 +++$+++ 13464 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.312397040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up! I had seen it - it's what prompted me to split things up, because the length of the Finn thread had gone beyond awkward to navigate with all the sub-topics :) I shall go and comment over there now.  +++$+++ :::::::Thanks for the heads up! I had seen it - it's what prompted me to split things up, because the length of the Finn thread had gone beyond awkward to navigate with all the sub-topics :) I shall go and comment over there now. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 11:44, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
13466 +++$+++ BlueMoonset +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13458 +++$+++ 13465 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312503840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for stopping by there. I'm also just getting used to the ''Glee''-related activity on my talk page\u2014admittedly mostly self-generated\u2014and am dithering about what to tackle next, since everything today's been minor adjustments so far. Having actually said that, the likelihood is that I'll find I've started working on something significant within the hour...  +++$+++ ::::::::Thanks for stopping by there. I'm also just getting used to the ''Glee''-related activity on my talk page—admittedly mostly self-generated—and am dithering about what to tackle next, since everything today's been minor adjustments so far. Having actually said that, the likelihood is that I'll find I've started working on something significant within the hour... [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 17:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

537748 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537748 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.174356960E09 +++$+++ Aldux, please put a stop to this. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mardin&action=history] <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ Aldux, please put a stop to this. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mardin&action=history] <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 19:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
537749 +++$+++ Oguz1 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537748 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.174359600E09 +++$+++ Not sure what's wrong with asking for a source when they're making allegations of murder.  -- +++$+++ :: Not sure what's wrong with asking for a source when they're making allegations of murder.  --[[User:Oguz1|Oguz1]] 20:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
537750 +++$+++ Artaxiad +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537748 +++$+++ 537748 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.174381260E09 +++$+++ *Sigh* this is weird from him too, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Coca-Cola&diff=prev&oldid=113928193]  +++$+++ : *Sigh* this is weird from him too, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coca-Cola&diff=prev&oldid=113928193] [[User:Artaxiad|Artaxiad]] 02:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

275609 +++$+++ 'Arry Boy +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275609 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-25 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.203982620E09 +++$+++ Hi Steve, I wonder if you could help me again please. \"Jimbo on line\" has requested a source for the Reg Burr qoute in the Millwall article. It's a very well known quote, because Burr was one of the few chairman to ever stick up for the ordinary decent Millwall fans. I have a VHS tape of him saying it in a Channel 4 documentary in 1989, is it at all possible to use this as a source, and if so, will you please tell me how to do it? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Steve, I wonder if you could help me again please. "Jimbo on line" has requested a source for the Reg Burr qoute in the Millwall article. It's a very well known quote, because Burr was one of the few chairman to ever stick up for the ordinary decent Millwall fans. I have a VHS tape of him saying it in a Channel 4 documentary in 1989, is it at all possible to use this as a source, and if so, will you please tell me how to do it? Thanks, [[User:&#39;Arry Boy|&#39;Arry Boy]] ([[User talk:&#39;Arry Boy|talk]]) 15:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
275610 +++$+++ 'Arry Boy +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275609 +++$+++ 275609 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.204008780E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for your help Steve, I ''think'' I've done it! I really do appreciate it. Cheers Mate.  +++$+++ :Thanks very much for your help Steve, I ''think'' I've done it! I really do appreciate it. Cheers Mate. [[User:&#39;Arry Boy|&#39;Arry Boy]] ([[User talk:&#39;Arry Boy|talk]]) 22:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
275611 +++$+++ 'Arry Boy +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275609 +++$+++ 275609 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.204010700E09 +++$+++ Nice one! I wondered why I couldn't see anything! Cheers,  +++$+++ :Nice one! I wondered why I couldn't see anything! Cheers, [[User:&#39;Arry Boy|&#39;Arry Boy]] ([[User talk:&#39;Arry Boy|talk]]) 23:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
275612 +++$+++ 'Arry Boy +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275609 +++$+++ 275609 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.204046520E09 +++$+++ Hi Steve. The full details are, Production: Norma Spence, Consultants: Tony Mason, John Williams. WORKING PICTURES (MILLWALL) LTD production for Channel Four. Copyright 1989. Once again thanks for all your help. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi Steve. The full details are, Production: Norma Spence, Consultants: Tony Mason, John Williams. WORKING PICTURES (MILLWALL) LTD production for Channel Four. Copyright 1989. Once again thanks for all your help. Cheers, [[User:&#39;Arry Boy|&#39;Arry Boy]] ([[User talk:&#39;Arry Boy|talk]]) 09:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
275613 +++$+++ 'Arry Boy +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275609 +++$+++ 275609 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.204098420E09 +++$+++ Cheers Steve, appreciate that mate.  +++$+++ :Cheers Steve, appreciate that mate. [[User:&#39;Arry Boy|&#39;Arry Boy]] ([[User talk:&#39;Arry Boy|talk]]) 23:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

13467 +++$+++ CycloneGU +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.312331280E09 +++$+++ Speaking of finishing up S2 articles yet, are we going to try to make the S2 list of episodes a FL alongside the first one?   +++$+++ Speaking of finishing up S2 articles yet, are we going to try to make the S2 list of episodes a FL alongside the first one?  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 17:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13468 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13467 +++$+++ 13467 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312335960E09 +++$+++ Definitely! I did a fair whack of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Glee_%28season_2%29&action=historysubmit&diff=431089709&oldid=430990809 prep work] at the end of May, but haven't spent much time on it since. A few sections need a lot of work, but it's not in bad shape overall.  +++$+++ :Definitely! I did a fair whack of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glee_%28season_2%29&action=historysubmit&diff=431089709&oldid=430990809 prep work] at the end of May, but haven't spent much time on it since. A few sections need a lot of work, but it's not in bad shape overall. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 18:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13469 +++$+++ CycloneGU +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13467 +++$+++ 13468 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312336440E09 +++$+++ <s>Why are all of the lines a lime green now?<\/s>  That colour doesn't look as good as the others, and the blue originally there was much better.  Is there a new colour thing we have to follow?   +++$+++ ::<s>Why are all of the lines a lime green now?</s>  That colour doesn't look as good as the others, and the blue originally there was much better.  Is there a new colour thing we have to follow?  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 18:54, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13470 +++$+++ CycloneGU +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13467 +++$+++ 13468 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312336560E09 +++$+++ Oops, now they're orange.  But seriously, is there not a guideline to follow for this?   +++$+++ ::Oops, now they're orange.  But seriously, is there not a guideline to follow for this?  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 18:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13471 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13467 +++$+++ 13470 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.312337040E09 +++$+++ Standard practice is for the colour to match the DVD boxset. The s2 boxset is... [http:\/\/www.tvshowsondvd.com\/n\/15585 rather garish].  +++$+++ :::Standard practice is for the colour to match the DVD boxset. The s2 boxset is... [http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/n/15585 rather garish]. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 19:04, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13472 +++$+++ CycloneGU +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13467 +++$+++ 13471 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.312338480E09 +++$+++ That is actually a close match.   +++$+++ ::::That is actually a close match.  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 19:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

576565 +++$+++ Kossack4Truth +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576565 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-07 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.212897840E09 +++$+++ First, this has been an ugly situation for some time and more attention from admins is needed. Second, the Obama fanboys need to be brought under control. They do not own the article. [[WP:NPOV]] means proportionate representation of all significant POVs. The POV that is questioning Obama about his relationships with Wright, Rezko and Ayers is not a fringe POV. Editors who seek to include that POV in a balanced manner are not \"Obama haters,\" and when they agree with one another, they are not sockpuppets. Please help.  +++$+++ First, this has been an ugly situation for some time and more attention from admins is needed. Second, the Obama fanboys need to be brought under control. They do not own the article. [[WP:NPOV]] means proportionate representation of all significant POVs. The POV that is questioning Obama about his relationships with Wright, Rezko and Ayers is not a fringe POV. Editors who seek to include that POV in a balanced manner are not "Obama haters," and when they agree with one another, they are not sockpuppets. Please help. [[User:Kossack4Truth|Kossack4Truth]] ([[User talk:Kossack4Truth|talk]]) 21:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
576566 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576565 +++$+++ 576565 +++$+++ 2008-06-08 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.212930240E09 +++$+++ NPOV in the bio of a political candidate for President sounds like an almost impossible task...and I really can't be of much service. I can monitor the article for vandalism as well as the one on McCain, but that would be the full extent of my ability to contribute to either page.-- +++$+++ :NPOV in the bio of a political candidate for President sounds like an almost impossible task...and I really can't be of much service. I can monitor the article for vandalism as well as the one on McCain, but that would be the full extent of my ability to contribute to either page.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 06:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
576567 +++$+++ BenBurch +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576565 +++$+++ 576566 +++$+++ 2008-06-08 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.212989640E09 +++$+++ What is there now appears to be balanced.  If that is the consensus version he refers to, I can't see why anybody would want to \"sanitize\" it.  -- +++$+++ ::What is there now appears to be balanced.  If that is the consensus version he refers to, I can't see why anybody would want to "sanitize" it.  --[[User:BenBurch|BenBurch]] ([[User talk:BenBurch|talk]]) 22:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

275614 +++$+++ Attenboroughp +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-16 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.208381520E09 +++$+++ However, I messed the upload process up a bit.  I've tried reading the tutorials etc. but to no avail.  Please can you contact me at my talk page and help me out with the image upload?  It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -  +++$+++ However, I messed the upload process up a bit.  I've tried reading the tutorials etc. but to no avail.  Please can you contact me at my talk page and help me out with the image upload?  It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks - [[User:Attenboroughp|Attenboroughp]] ([[User talk:Attenboroughp|talk]]) 14:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
275615 +++$+++ Attenboroughp +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275614 +++$+++ 275614 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.208396160E09 +++$+++ Many thanks -  +++$+++ :Many thanks - [[User:Attenboroughp|Attenboroughp]] ([[User talk:Attenboroughp|talk]]) 18:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
275616 +++$+++ Attenboroughp +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275614 +++$+++ 275615 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.208403420E09 +++$+++ Regards -  +++$+++ ::Regards - [[User:Attenboroughp|Attenboroughp]] ([[User talk:Attenboroughp|talk]]) 20:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

395461 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ 395461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-18 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.200681240E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 10:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
395462 +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ 395461 +++$+++ 395461 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.200904920E09 +++$+++ Fixed. Someone removed it from the page without explanation.  +++$+++ :Fixed. Someone removed it from the page without explanation. [[User:Grendelkhan|grendel]]|[[User_talk:Grendelkhan|khan]] 00:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

537760 +++$+++ f-m-t +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537760 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-20 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.174411740E09 +++$+++ I'm starting on the images, I've made the basic outline, could you let me know what changes to make before I do the others? Btw, I'm not sure if the arrowed lines show or not on yours, but if you click the image to full version they show here. Could be something with the browser or with Wikipedia. -  +++$+++ I'm starting on the images, I've made the basic outline, could you let me know what changes to make before I do the others? Btw, I'm not sure if the arrowed lines show or not on yours, but if you click the image to full version they show here. Could be something with the browser or with Wikipedia. - [[User:f-m-t|Francis Tyers]] [[User_talk:f-m-t|·]] 10:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
537761 +++$+++ f-m-t +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537760 +++$+++ 537760 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.174426440E09 +++$+++ I have a small problem. The position of the towns moves between 1975\/6 and 1985. I find this unlikely in reality, but should I move the towns with each map, or standardise on one area? -  +++$+++ :I have a small problem. The position of the towns moves between 1975/6 and 1985. I find this unlikely in reality, but should I move the towns with each map, or standardise on one area? - [[User:f-m-t|Francis Tyers]] [[User_talk:f-m-t|·]] 14:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
537762 +++$+++ f-m-t +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537760 +++$+++ 537761 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.174577640E09 +++$+++ They are actually pointed, I'm not sure why the points aren't showing up :| -  +++$+++ ::They are actually pointed, I'm not sure why the points aren't showing up :| - [[User:f-m-t|Francis Tyers]] [[User_talk:f-m-t|·]] 08:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

13473 +++$+++ CycloneGU +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.312328040E09 +++$+++ Hope to talk to ya soon. =)   +++$+++ Hope to talk to ya soon. =)  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 16:34, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13474 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13473 +++$+++ 13473 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312329000E09 +++$+++ Hey, long time no speak! I've been having a horribly busy summer, but thankfully my schedule's cleared up a little as of this week :). I am indeed still following ''Glee'' (and in fact got the orange message notification while editing ''[[Glee: The 3D Concert Movie]]'' just now :D). \"The Glee Project\" started here a few weeks ago, but after catching the intro and first episode, I've missed episodes two and three, oops! If you're still around in a couple of hours, I'll pop on MSN after dinner for a catch-up :).  +++$+++ :Hey, long time no speak! I've been having a horribly busy summer, but thankfully my schedule's cleared up a little as of this week :). I am indeed still following ''Glee'' (and in fact got the orange message notification while editing ''[[Glee: The 3D Concert Movie]]'' just now :D). "The Glee Project" started here a few weeks ago, but after catching the intro and first episode, I've missed episodes two and three, oops! If you're still around in a couple of hours, I'll pop on MSN after dinner for a catch-up :). [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 16:50, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13475 +++$+++ CycloneGU +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13473 +++$+++ 13474 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312330860E09 +++$+++ I may be able to direct you to those episodes online. =)  I'm invisible on MSN lately (will explain later), but I'll make sure you can see me. =)   +++$+++ ::I may be able to direct you to those episodes online. =)  I'm invisible on MSN lately (will explain later), but I'll make sure you can see me. =)  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 17:21, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13476 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13473 +++$+++ 13475 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312336020E09 +++$+++ Awesome! I shall be on in just over an hour :)  +++$+++ :::Awesome! I shall be on in just over an hour :) [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 18:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

541649 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-13 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.210687080E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 06:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
541650 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541649 +++$+++ 541649 +++$+++ 2008-05-13 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.210687140E09 +++$+++ Stupid robot!  Public domain!   +++$+++ :Stupid robot!  Public domain!  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 06:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

537763 +++$+++ Raoulduke47 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-20 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.174436820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Raoulduke47|Raoulduke47]] 17:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
537764 +++$+++ Raoulduke47 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537763 +++$+++ 537763 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.174597140E09 +++$+++ Yes: [[Ouadi Doum air raid]] or [[Airstrike on Ouadi Doum]], any of those seems suitable. The French probably didn't give it a specific name because it was all considered part of \"Op\xe9ration \xe9pervier\". BTW, cleaning up the Chadian-Lybian conflict article was no problem: it was a great read!  +++$+++ :Yes: [[Ouadi Doum air raid]] or [[Airstrike on Ouadi Doum]], any of those seems suitable. The French probably didn't give it a specific name because it was all considered part of "Opération épervier". BTW, cleaning up the Chadian-Lybian conflict article was no problem: it was a great read! [[User:Raoulduke47|Raoulduke47]] 13:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

13477 +++$+++ InExcelsisDeo +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.312518300E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for the welcome you say you have source for the development section could you add that to the discussion page or meesage me thanks. Once again thanks for the welcome-- +++$+++ Hey, thanks for the welcome you say you have source for the development section could you add that to the discussion page or meesage me thanks. Once again thanks for the welcome--[[User:InExcelsisDeo|<font size="3.8" face="Times New Roman" color="black"><big>'''I'''</big>'''nExcelsis'''</font> <font color="blue">'''Deo'''</font>]][[User_Talk:InExcelsisDeo|''Talk'']] 21:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
13478 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13477 +++$+++ 13477 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.312492620E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome! Unfortunately, the interview was in the 19 July issue of ''Inside Soap'', and I didn't buy a copy. I believe that  +++$+++ :You're very welcome! Unfortunately, the interview was in the 19 July issue of ''Inside Soap'', and I didn't buy a copy. I believe that [[User:Raintheone]] (who I mentioned on your talk page) buys the magazine most weeks, so I'll ask if he'd be kind enough to scan it if he has a copy :). [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 14:17, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

275622 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-14 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.223986680E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 05:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
275623 +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275622 +++$+++ 275622 +++$+++ 2008-11-28 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.227863400E09 +++$+++ I'll refer you to the response I gave to the above user on their [[User talk:RoverTheBendInSussex#Oliver Holt|talk page]]. There are plenty of places on the internet to voice your opinion of Oliver Holt and his articles, but Wikipedia is not one of them.  +++$+++ :I'll refer you to the response I gave to the above user on their [[User talk:RoverTheBendInSussex#Oliver Holt|talk page]]. There are plenty of places on the internet to voice your opinion of Oliver Holt and his articles, but Wikipedia is not one of them. [[User:SteveO|SteveO]] ([[User talk:SteveO#top|talk]]) 01:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

13479 +++$+++ InExcelsisDeo +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13479 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.312518300E09 +++$+++ Thanks that would be great. I hope you dont mind but I added an image to your draft article [[User:Frickative\/Sahira Shah]]. By the way when are you planning to put that article on the real page. -- +++$+++ Thanks that would be great. I hope you dont mind but I added an image to your draft article [[User:Frickative/Sahira Shah]]. By the way when are you planning to put that article on the real page. --[[User:InExcelsisDeo|<font size="3.8" face="Times New Roman" color="black"><big>'''I'''</big>'''nExcelsis'''</font> <font color="blue">'''Deo'''</font>]][[User_Talk:InExcelsisDeo|''Talk'']] 21:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
13480 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13479 +++$+++ 13479 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.312494480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for uploading an image! Wikipedia's image-use guidelines are unfortunately quite complex, and we're not allowed to use fair-use images until an article moves into the mainspace. I've added a colon to the link for now, just to stop it displaying until the page is moved. I don't know how long that will be - the draft is pretty well developed now, but there are still [[User talk:Frickative\/Sahira Shah|a lot of sources]] to go through, and I'd like to get it as complete as possible before the move.  +++$+++ :Thanks for uploading an image! Wikipedia's image-use guidelines are unfortunately quite complex, and we're not allowed to use fair-use images until an article moves into the mainspace. I've added a colon to the link for now, just to stop it displaying until the page is moved. I don't know how long that will be - the draft is pretty well developed now, but there are still [[User talk:Frickative/Sahira Shah|a lot of sources]] to go through, and I'd like to get it as complete as possible before the move. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 14:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

13481 +++$+++ InExcelsisDeo +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13481 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.312518300E09 +++$+++ I've also started the [[Elizabeth Tait (Holby City)]] its lacking right know as im updating it. I would be grateful of any sources. Also I tried cretaing it with my user space but didn't know how could you provide help so I know for future articles. Thank you. -- +++$+++ I've also started the [[Elizabeth Tait (Holby City)]] its lacking right know as im updating it. I would be grateful of any sources. Also I tried cretaing it with my user space but didn't know how could you provide help so I know for future articles. Thank you. --[[User:InExcelsisDeo|<font size="3.8" face="Times New Roman" color="black"><big>'''I'''</big>'''nExcelsis'''</font> <font color="blue">'''Deo'''</font>]][[User_Talk:InExcelsisDeo|''Talk'']] 21:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
13482 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13481 +++$+++ 13481 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312497360E09 +++$+++ Sure, if you want to start something in your user space, just add the title to the end of your own page, eg. [[User:InExcelsisDeo\/Sacha Levy]] or  +++$+++ :Sure, if you want to start something in your user space, just add the title to the end of your own page, eg. [[User:InExcelsisDeo/Sacha Levy]] or [[User:InExcelsisDeo/Chantelle Lane]]. Then when you're done, you just hit the 'move' tab at the top and delete the 'User:InExcelsisDeo/' portion to get it into the main space. For Elizabeth, I know La Charne Jolly has also been interviewed by ''Inside Soap'' a couple of times, but I don't recall when or even if any particularly useful information came out of it. I think it'll be a struggle to find many useful sources, as her role only recently became prominent, but I'll dig around and drop off anything I find at the talk page for you. Also, as [[Elizabeth Tait]] is a three-year-old redirect referring to an actress who appears to have only ever had [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0846887/ one role], as long as enough sources can be found for the ''Holby'' character to prove notability, it could take over the [[Elizabeth Tait]] link rather than needing the (Holby City) disambiguation. [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 15:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

275626 +++$+++ JamesBWatson +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-14 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.260814020E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised.  Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}<\/code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed Deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy Deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised.  Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed Deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy Deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson|talk]]) 10:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
275627 +++$+++ JamesBWatson +++$+++ SteveO +++$+++ 275626 +++$+++ 275626 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.260835860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know about your response on the article's talk page. Can you find reliable sources to support what you say? If you can give good evidence for notability I shall be perfectly happy for the article to be kept.  +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know about your response on the article's talk page. Can you find reliable sources to support what you say? If you can give good evidence for notability I shall be perfectly happy for the article to be kept. [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson|talk]]) 16:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

395463 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ 395463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-24 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.201177620E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 04:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
395464 +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ 395463 +++$+++ 395463 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.205349660E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image:Road_Apples.jpg&diff=188985700&oldid=186511388 Fixed] by [[User:Nanonic|Nanonic]].  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Road_Apples.jpg&diff=188985700&oldid=186511388 Fixed] by [[User:Nanonic|Nanonic]]. [[User:Grendelkhan|grendel]]|[[User_talk:Grendelkhan|khan]] 12:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

13484 +++$+++ InExcelsisDeo +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.312518300E09 +++$+++ Could you please explain to me why the images  (Patrenco and Shah and Nurse Tait (which has already been deleted)) I uploaded are being nominated for speedy deletion by other users. I uploaded them using all the same labeling which allows this image to stay up on the [[Oliver Valentine]] article http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:Oliver_Valentine.jpg im a little confused. Thanks -- +++$+++ Could you please explain to me why the images  (Patrenco and Shah and Nurse Tait (which has already been deleted)) I uploaded are being nominated for speedy deletion by other users. I uploaded them using all the same labeling which allows this image to stay up on the [[Oliver Valentine]] article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Oliver_Valentine.jpg im a little confused. Thanks --[[User:InExcelsisDeo|<font size="3.8" face="Times New Roman" color="black"><big>'''I'''</big>'''nExcelsis'''</font> <font color="blue">'''Deo'''</font>]][[User_Talk:InExcelsisDeo|''Talk'']] 21:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
13485 +++$+++ Raintheone +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13484 +++$+++ 13484 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312508820E09 +++$+++ Sorry to butt in here. All the images have now been nominated for deletion.. I think you should have waited before creating Frieda's page too. BUT WOW! I'm so happy another editor is interested in Holby. This could be so much more fun now. They are being nominated because there is either no article in the mainspace (Sahira) or not enough info to justify the image (Elizabeth and Frieda) ... I think you may have drew attention to the images with the extra long file name. For example - \"Sahira Shah.jpg\" will do fine. :) We could work on Sacha an co together if you like. We mays well complete the article before moving it into the main space and get a good 'Did you know' nomination. ( Do you watch any other shows? =D ) +++$+++ :Sorry to butt in here. All the images have now been nominated for deletion.. I think you should have waited before creating Frieda's page too. BUT WOW! I'm so happy another editor is interested in Holby. This could be so much more fun now. They are being nominated because there is either no article in the mainspace (Sahira) or not enough info to justify the image (Elizabeth and Frieda) ... I think you may have drew attention to the images with the extra long file name. For example - "Sahira Shah.jpg" will do fine. :) We could work on Sacha an co together if you like. We mays well complete the article before moving it into the main space and get a good 'Did you know' nomination. ( Do you watch any other shows? =D )[[User:Raintheone|'''<span style="color:blue;font-family:Tahoma">Rain<span style="color:green;font-family:Tahoma">the</span>One</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Raintheone|<font color="green">'''BAM'''</font>]]</sup> 18:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

537775 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537775 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-02 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.175535960E09 +++$+++ See [[Special:Contributions\/Joker 13]]. Cheers. -- +++$+++ See [[Special:Contributions/Joker 13]]. Cheers. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 10:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
537776 +++$+++ Giovanni Giove +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537775 +++$+++ 537775 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.175665200E09 +++$+++ I ask your help against the last sockpuppet of Afrika_paprika (Joker 13). I beg you to intoduce a permanent sprotectio on [[Republic of Ragusa]]: in the history you can see the amount of RV I had to do. That's exahusting. I've asked 3 times the block in the proper page, but nobody has understood. You are familiar with this problem, so, please, do something. Same situation with [[Giacomo Micaglia]], [[Giovanni Serafino Bona]] and [[Marino Ghettaldi]]. Thank you.-- +++$+++ : I ask your help against the last sockpuppet of Afrika_paprika (Joker 13). I beg you to intoduce a permanent sprotectio on [[Republic of Ragusa]]: in the history you can see the amount of RV I had to do. That's exahusting. I've asked 3 times the block in the proper page, but nobody has understood. You are familiar with this problem, so, please, do something. Same situation with [[Giacomo Micaglia]], [[Giovanni Serafino Bona]] and [[Marino Ghettaldi]]. Thank you.--[[User:Giovanni Giove|Giovanni Giove]] 22:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
537777 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537775 +++$+++ 537776 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.175727120E09 +++$+++ Excuse me both for awnsering so late, but real life work has kept me away from internet in the last days. Joker13 has been in the meanwhile dealt with, and I've blocked his successor. I've also placed a series of semiprotections to make life more difficult for our dear AP, lets see if it's enough.-- +++$+++ ::Excuse me both for awnsering so late, but real life work has kept me away from internet in the last days. Joker13 has been in the meanwhile dealt with, and I've blocked his successor. I've also placed a series of semiprotections to make life more difficult for our dear AP, lets see if it's enough.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 15:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

13488 +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312572720E09 +++$+++ Finally, nice taste in programmes! I love ''Grey's'' and ''House'' - I've done a fair bit of editing to the ''Grey's Anatomy'' articles, though I've only ever worked on a couple of ''House'' pages. I guess I just really like medical dramas :)  +++$+++ Finally, nice taste in programmes! I love ''Grey's'' and ''House'' - I've done a fair bit of editing to the ''Grey's Anatomy'' articles, though I've only ever worked on a couple of ''House'' pages. I guess I just really like medical dramas :) [[User talk:Frickative|<font face="Courier New">Frickative</font>]] 12:32, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
13489 +++$+++ Raintheone +++$+++ Frickative +++$+++ 13488 +++$+++ 13488 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312599000E09 +++$+++ The image was deleted. It pisses me off sometimes. Shall we just use a screenshot? +++$+++ :The image was deleted. It pisses me off sometimes. Shall we just use a screenshot?[[User:Raintheone|'''<span style="color:blue;font-family:Tahoma">Rain<span style="color:green;font-family:Tahoma">the</span>One</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Raintheone|<font color="green">'''BAM'''</font>]]</sup> 19:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

13491 +++$+++ TransporterMan +++$+++ Djflem +++$+++ 13491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-26 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.306467120E09 +++$+++ Did you mean to create an article? Best regards,  +++$+++ Did you mean to create an article? Best regards, [[User:TransporterMan|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color:blue; font-variant:small-caps;">'''TransporterMan'''</span>]] ([[User talk:TransporterMan|<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="1">TALK</font>]]) 20:32, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
13492 +++$+++ TransporterMan +++$+++ Djflem +++$+++ 13491 +++$+++ 13491 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.306468440E09 +++$+++ What you used isn't the right one, but I'm sure it will work. For future reference, what you really needed was {{tlp|db-g7}} aka {{tlp|db-author}}. Best regards,  +++$+++ :What you used isn't the right one, but I'm sure it will work. For future reference, what you really needed was {{tlp|db-g7}} aka {{tlp|db-author}}. Best regards, [[User:TransporterMan|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color:blue; font-variant:small-caps;">'''TransporterMan'''</span>]] ([[User talk:TransporterMan|<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="1">TALK</font>]]) 20:54, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

275636 +++$+++ Manchot +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275636 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-11 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.139692800E09 +++$+++ <div style=\"padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE\"> An image or media file that you uploaded, [[:Image:Vista-5270-desktop-classic.png]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]]. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- {{idw}} --><\/div> because of [http:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/mscorp\/permission\/default.mspx#ELC microsoft copyright] saying ''\"'''Except for''' Microsoft product boot-up screens, opening screens, \"splash screens,\" or '''screens from products that have not been commercially released (including beta versions)''', you may use screen shots\"''  +++$+++ <div style="padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE"> An image or media file that you uploaded, [[:Image:Vista-5270-desktop-classic.png]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]]. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- {{idw}} --></div> because of [http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/permission/default.mspx#ELC microsoft copyright] saying ''"'''Except for''' Microsoft product boot-up screens, opening screens, "splash screens," or '''screens from products that have not been commercially released (including beta versions)''', you may use screen shots"'' [[User:Manchot|Manchot]] 13:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
275637 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275636 +++$+++ 275636 +++$+++ 2006-02-11 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.139721180E09 +++$+++ I voted to keep, glad you are e-mailing Microsoft about this issue. \u2014  +++$+++ :I voted to keep, glad you are e-mailing Microsoft about this issue. — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 21:13, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
275638 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275636 +++$+++ 275636 +++$+++ 2006-02-11 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.139722440E09 +++$+++ Also, I found this in the Connect .beta_program newsgroup: ''There is no confidentiality clause in the EULA for the current build (5270) and you may talk about the current build in public.'' \u2014  +++$+++ :Also, I found this in the Connect .beta_program newsgroup: ''There is no confidentiality clause in the EULA for the current build (5270) and you may talk about the current build in public.'' — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 21:34, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

395465 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ 395465 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-24 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.201179720E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 05:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
395466 +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ 395465 +++$+++ 395465 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.205349720E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image:Sandman_no.1_%28Modern_Age%29.comiccover.jpg&diff=186719281&oldid=186519402 Fixed] by [[User:J Greb|J Greb]].  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Sandman_no.1_%28Modern_Age%29.comiccover.jpg&diff=186719281&oldid=186519402 Fixed] by [[User:J Greb|J Greb]]. [[User:Grendelkhan|grendel]]|[[User_talk:Grendelkhan|khan]] 12:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

275640 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-01 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.141217160E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know that I moved the [[Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs]] article, and that you might want to update your user page accordingly. \u2014  +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know that I moved the [[Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs]] article, and that you might want to update your user page accordingly. — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 04:46, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
275641 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275640 +++$+++ 275640 +++$+++ 2006-03-01 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.141218060E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I appreciate it. :-)  +++$+++ :Thanks, I appreciate it. :-) [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 05:01, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
275642 +++$+++ Fasten +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275640 +++$+++ 275640 +++$+++ 2006-03-01 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.141244100E09 +++$+++ Sorry, that was my error. You did not indicate you were willing to accept assignments. I modified the assignment. -- +++$+++ : Sorry, that was my error. You did not indicate you were willing to accept assignments. I modified the assignment. --[[User:Fasten|Fasten]] 12:15, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
275643 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275640 +++$+++ 275640 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.142157480E09 +++$+++ I think that's a very good idea.  Also, when Vista will be released, nobody will care about the build list, and stuff like that. This means that we can start cleaning the Vista article out. How about \"Development of Windows Vista\"? \u2014  +++$+++ :I think that's a very good idea.  Also, when Vista will be released, nobody will care about the build list, and stuff like that. This means that we can start cleaning the Vista article out. How about "Development of Windows Vista"? — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 01:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
275644 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275640 +++$+++ 275643 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.142171040E09 +++$+++ Sounds good to me!  Let's go with that name.   +++$+++ ::Sounds good to me!  Let's go with that name.  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 05:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

could not match методије
537788 +++$+++ методије +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-24 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.177461300E09 +++$+++ You are setting the wrong example as an administrator by reverting an article to the version you want without responding to a message on the article's [[Talk:Macedonia (terminology)|talk page]]. Maybe you didn't see it?-- +++$+++ You are setting the wrong example as an administrator by reverting an article to the version you want without responding to a message on the article's [[Talk:Macedonia (terminology)|talk page]]. Maybe you didn't see it?--[[User:Методије|Methodius]] 17:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
537789 +++$+++ Nasz +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537788 +++$+++ 537788 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.177551540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Nasz|Nasz]] 18:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

275645 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-12 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.142170800E09 +++$+++ I am wondering what you think about [[User:Bdude|Bdude]]'s suggestion about splitting Windows Vista in two. I think it's unnecessary, and his suggestion doesn't make a lot of sense. And you are planning on creating a Windows Vista development article anyway. Please let me know on my talk page about what you think. \u2014  +++$+++ I am wondering what you think about [[User:Bdude|Bdude]]'s suggestion about splitting Windows Vista in two. I think it's unnecessary, and his suggestion doesn't make a lot of sense. And you are planning on creating a Windows Vista development article anyway. Please let me know on my talk page about what you think. — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 05:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
275646 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275645 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.142171520E09 +++$+++ Should we do anything about the tag? Or maybe get started on the article? \u2014  +++$+++ ::Should we do anything about the tag? Or maybe get started on the article? — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 05:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
275647 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275645 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.142172060E09 +++$+++ [[Development of Windows Vista]]. :-)   +++$+++ :::[[Development of Windows Vista]]. :-)  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 06:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

13503 +++$+++ NortyNort +++$+++ Djflem +++$+++ 13503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.310465940E09 +++$+++ Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web -->  +++$+++ Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --> [[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]]  <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 03:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
13504 +++$+++ NortyNort +++$+++ Djflem +++$+++ 13503 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310466240E09 +++$+++ The same problem with [[Perth Amboy City Hall]] and [[Wind power in New Jersey]].-- +++$+++ :*The same problem with [[Perth Amboy City Hall]] and [[Wind power in New Jersey]].--[[User:NortyNort|NortyNort]]  <small>[[User talk:NortyNort|(Holla)]]</small> 03:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

275648 +++$+++ Csaribay +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275648 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-14 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.142393400E09 +++$+++ Woopsie- looks like when I was rolling back on [[Microsoft]], [[User:Voice of All]] got to it first. I'm not sure what happened, but it appears my revert was of the incorrect copy. Sorry about that! -  +++$+++ Woopsie- looks like when I was rolling back on [[Microsoft]], [[User:Voice of All]] got to it first. I'm not sure what happened, but it appears my revert was of the incorrect copy. Sorry about that! - [[User:Csaribay|Chris Saribay]] 19:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
275649 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275648 +++$+++ 275648 +++$+++ 2006-03-14 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.142393580E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I figured it was something a little weird like that.  Oh well, happens to all of us. :-)  +++$+++ :Yeah, I figured it was something a little weird like that.  Oh well, happens to all of us. :-) [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 19:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

13505 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Djflem +++$+++ 13505 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.311573000E09 +++$+++ Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web -->  +++$+++ Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --> [[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 22:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
13506 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Djflem +++$+++ 13505 +++$+++ 13505 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.311573000E09 +++$+++ Please see the talk page for more information about how to repair close paraphrasing issues. Thank you. -- +++$+++ :Please see the talk page for more information about how to repair close paraphrasing issues. Thank you. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 22:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

275650 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-20 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.142926980E09 +++$+++ Hey Warren. Thanks a lot for the barnstar! I was thinking about giving you a barnstar, but you beat me. You dseserve this much more than me. Keep up the great work you've been doing! \u2014  +++$+++ Hey Warren. Thanks a lot for the barnstar! I was thinking about giving you a barnstar, but you beat me. You dseserve this much more than me. Keep up the great work you've been doing! — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 23:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
275651 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275650 +++$+++ 275650 +++$+++ 2006-03-21 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.142947560E09 +++$+++ Wow, hey thanks!  We've still got a lot of work ahead of us, but I think it's going to be a lot of fun.   +++$+++ :Wow, hey thanks!  We've still got a lot of work ahead of us, but I think it's going to be a lot of fun.  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 05:26, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
275652 +++$+++ RN +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275650 +++$+++ 275651 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.143051720E09 +++$+++ Indeed - thanks! We still do have a bit of work to do. Most of the top-level articles in Category:Microsoft are essentially taken care of POV and cleanup-wise as well as those in MSN... I think we have a ways to go on the rest of the windows-related stuff though :). Thanks for the compliments too BTW! <small> +++$+++ ::Indeed - thanks! We still do have a bit of work to do. Most of the top-level articles in Category:Microsoft are essentially taken care of POV and cleanup-wise as well as those in MSN... I think we have a ways to go on the rest of the windows-related stuff though :). Thanks for the compliments too BTW! <small>[[User:RN|Just another star in the night]] <sup><font color="#6BA800">[[User talk:RN|T]]</font> | <font color="#0033FF">[[Special:Emailuser/RN|@]]</font> | <font color="#FF0000">[[Special:Contributions/RN|C]]</font></sup></small> 10:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

537796 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537796 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-01 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.178046960E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/128.195.98.160]] -- +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/128.195.98.160]] --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 12:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
537797 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537796 +++$+++ 537796 +++$+++ 2007-05-01 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.178049660E09 +++$+++ Hi Pax. I've looked at his edits, and while his edits have been of pretty low quality, as they don't respect [[WP:ATT]] and [[WP:NPOV]], I can't block him for that, or else I would have to block a good number of editors working on Balkans-related topics, and also he hasn't made new violations of [[WP:NPA]]. Maybe you should try to speak with him about providing reliable sources and being more collaborative, or better still, try to convince [[User:CrnaGora]] to speak to him about the importance of the rules that govern wikipedia. Spoken to by a compatriot he may be more wishing to listen.-- +++$+++ :Hi Pax. I've looked at his edits, and while his edits have been of pretty low quality, as they don't respect [[WP:ATT]] and [[WP:NPOV]], I can't block him for that, or else I would have to block a good number of editors working on Balkans-related topics, and also he hasn't made new violations of [[WP:NPA]]. Maybe you should try to speak with him about providing reliable sources and being more collaborative, or better still, try to convince [[User:CrnaGora]] to speak to him about the importance of the rules that govern wikipedia. Spoken to by a compatriot he may be more wishing to listen.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 13:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
537798 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537796 +++$+++ 537797 +++$+++ 2007-05-01 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.178060640E09 +++$+++ BTW I'm a... \"compatriot\" myself. And he's not good with CrnaGora, Critika1 keeps adding controversial edits to [[Montenegrin language]] and CrnaGora rv him. -- +++$+++ ::BTW I'm a... "compatriot" myself. And he's not good with CrnaGora, Critika1 keeps adding controversial edits to [[Montenegrin language]] and CrnaGora rv him. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 16:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
537799 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537796 +++$+++ 537798 +++$+++ 2007-05-01 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.178062500E09 +++$+++ If you mean he may be Afrika, I have to disagree; I've carefully followed, as you know, all his editing patterns and I don't remember ever showing any interest for Montenegro. I agree, he's pretty disruptive, but for the moment I don't knowwhat exactly can be done. Maybe you should try asking Khoikhoi, he may know better than me what to do. Ciao,-- +++$+++ :::If you mean he may be Afrika, I have to disagree; I've carefully followed, as you know, all his editing patterns and I don't remember ever showing any interest for Montenegro. I agree, he's pretty disruptive, but for the moment I don't knowwhat exactly can be done. Maybe you should try asking Khoikhoi, he may know better than me what to do. Ciao,--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
537800 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537796 +++$+++ 537799 +++$+++ 2007-05-01 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.178081280E09 +++$+++ BTW Doclea is ancient medieval Montenegro. -- +++$+++ ::::BTW Doclea is ancient medieval Montenegro. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 21:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

275653 +++$+++ Syrthiss +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-22 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.143086940E09 +++$+++ Why did you remove that copyvio notice on [[Order of Aviz]]? -- +++$+++ Why did you remove that copyvio notice on [[Order of Aviz]]? --[[User:Syrthiss|Syrthiss]] 20:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
275654 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275653 +++$+++ 275653 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.143087240E09 +++$+++ I did?  Must've been a Popups-misfiring, sorry about that!  +++$+++ :I did?  Must've been a Popups-misfiring, sorry about that! [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 20:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
275655 +++$+++ RN +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275653 +++$+++ 275653 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.143087360E09 +++$+++ Looks like it could be a wikipedia mirror though.... <small> +++$+++ :Looks like it could be a wikipedia mirror though.... <small>[[User:RN|Just another star in the night]] <sup><font color="#6BA800">[[User talk:RN|T]]</font> | <font color="#0033FF">[[Special:Emailuser/RN|@]]</font> | <font color="#FF0000">[[Special:Contributions/RN|C]]</font></sup></small> 20:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
275656 +++$+++ Syrthiss +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275653 +++$+++ 275655 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.143087420E09 +++$+++ Thats one of the possibilities.  I'm hoping someone can clear it up.  I restored the copyvio notice for now. :) -- +++$+++ ::Thats one of the possibilities.  I'm hoping someone can clear it up.  I restored the copyvio notice for now. :) --[[User:Syrthiss|Syrthiss]] 20:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

351777 +++$+++ Ryan4314 +++$+++ Jerry +++$+++ 351777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-12 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.231769400E09 +++$+++ Thankyou for taking the time to read this, I hope I didn't confuse you with my above directions ;)  +++$+++ Thankyou for taking the time to read this, I hope I didn't confuse you with my above directions ;) [[User:Ryan4314|<strong><font color="Black">Ryan</font><font color="CornflowerBlue">4314</font></strong>]]  ([[User talk:Ryan4314|talk]]) 06:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
351778 +++$+++ Signaleer +++$+++ Jerry +++$+++ 351777 +++$+++ 351777 +++$+++ 2009-01-12 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.231800960E09 +++$+++ Agreed, seems irrational that the article was deleted considering the logic of many of the users who commented had no true rationale or logic or references to back up their statements. - +++$+++ * Agreed, seems irrational that the article was deleted considering the logic of many of the users who commented had no true rationale or logic or references to back up their statements. -[[User:Signaleer|Signaleer]] ([[User talk:Signaleer|talk]]) 14:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
351779 +++$+++ Jerry +++$+++ Jerry +++$+++ 351777 +++$+++ 351778 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.231846260E09 +++$+++ I have reconsidered the closing, and still think that deletion was the proper outcome.  Please see the AFD talk page for further explanation.  Thanks, <font face=\"century gothic\"  color=\"#eeff00\">'''[[User:Jerry|Jerry]]'''  <\/font><small>[[User Talk:Jerry|delusional]] \xa4  +++$+++ ::I have reconsidered the closing, and still think that deletion was the proper outcome.  Please see the AFD talk page for further explanation.  Thanks, <font face="century gothic"  color="#eeff00">'''[[User:Jerry|Jerry]]'''  </font><small>[[User Talk:Jerry|delusional]] ¤ [[User:Jerry/Count|kangaroo]]</small> 03:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
351780 +++$+++ Ryan4314 +++$+++ Jerry +++$+++ 351777 +++$+++ 351779 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.231910160E09 +++$+++ Hi Jerry, I've replied at the AFD talk page, or would you like me to reply here? Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Hi Jerry, I've replied at the AFD talk page, or would you like me to reply here? Cheers, [[User:Ryan4314|<strong><font color="Black">Ryan</font><font color="CornflowerBlue">4314</font></strong>]]  ([[User talk:Ryan4314|talk]]) 21:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

275657 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-26 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.143393300E09 +++$+++ Oops, I accidentally messed up your edits. Sorry about that, good thing the revision history is there. :-) By the way, I won't be very active in the coming weeks, have to take care of a few things. \u2014  +++$+++ Oops, I accidentally messed up your edits. Sorry about that, good thing the revision history is there. :-) By the way, I won't be very active in the coming weeks, have to take care of a few things. — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 09:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
275658 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275657 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-26 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.143394140E09 +++$+++ Haha, yeah. I just don't like space being wasted in an article, especially if the TOC is fairly long. About the move, I wish you good luck. Moves tend to be stressing. \u2014  +++$+++ ::Haha, yeah. I just don't like space being wasted in an article, especially if the TOC is fairly long. About the move, I wish you good luck. Moves tend to be stressing. — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 09:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

471818 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471818 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-27 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.196162940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking care of [[:Image:Tolkien Encyclopedia cover 2006.jpg\u200e]].  I got the 'bot message and I was completely stumped as to what was wrong with my Fair Use rationale. -  +++$+++ Thanks for taking care of [[:Image:Tolkien Encyclopedia cover 2006.jpg‎]].  I got the 'bot message and I was completely stumped as to what was wrong with my Fair Use rationale. - [[User:PKM|PKM]] ([[User talk:PKM|talk]]) 03:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
471819 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 471818 +++$+++ 471818 +++$+++ 2007-11-27 10:18:00 +++$+++ 1.196187480E09 +++$+++ No problem. Lots of people are getting stumped by that. Please mention this to the bot owner. He really should say in the template that it could be anything from no link to a redirect not having been corrected, but the message sometimes takes a while to get through.  +++$+++ :No problem. Lots of people are getting stumped by that. Please mention this to the bot owner. He really should say in the template that it could be anything from no link to a redirect not having been corrected, but the message sometimes takes a while to get through. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 10:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

45943 +++$+++ Truthkeeper88 +++$+++ Yllosubmarine +++$+++ 45943 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-11 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.302579360E09 +++$+++ Hi Maria, I don't know how much you're around these days, but wondered if you'd want to review Hemingway's ''[[True at First Light]]'' which is currently at FAC. Here's the link: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/True_at_First_Light\/archive1&redirect=no]. No prob if you're too busy. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Maria, I don't know how much you're around these days, but wondered if you'd want to review Hemingway's ''[[True at First Light]]'' which is currently at FAC. Here's the link: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/True_at_First_Light/archive1&redirect=no]. No prob if you're too busy. Thanks. [[User:Truthkeeper88|Truthkeeper88]] ([[User talk:Truthkeeper88|talk]]) 20:36, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
45944 +++$+++ Truthkeeper88 +++$+++ Yllosubmarine +++$+++ 45943 +++$+++ 45943 +++$+++ 2011-04-16 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.302992280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the review - very helpful. The page was promoted last night, so onward to the next one!  +++$+++ :Thanks for the review - very helpful. The page was promoted last night, so onward to the next one! [[User:Truthkeeper88|Truthkeeper88]] ([[User talk:Truthkeeper88|talk]]) 15:18, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

13516 +++$+++ Witch Hazzel +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13516 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311144720E09 +++$+++ You've done several reverts to the psychopathy article.  If you do any more in 24 hour period you will be reported.  +++$+++ You've done several reverts to the psychopathy article.  If you do any more in 24 hour period you will be reported. [[User:Witch Hazzel|Witch Hazzel]] ([[User talk:Witch Hazzel|talk]]) 23:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
13517 +++$+++ Thecheesykid +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13516 +++$+++ 13516 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311145080E09 +++$+++ He hasn't done more than three reverts to the [[psychopathy]] article and they were not the same edits that he reverted and is therefore outside of 3RR. ''' +++$+++ : He hasn't done more than three reverts to the [[psychopathy]] article and they were not the same edits that he reverted and is therefore outside of 3RR. '''[[User:Thecheesykid|<font face="Bodoni MT" color="#669933">That Ole Cheesy Dude</font>]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Thecheesykid|<font face="Bodoni MT" color="#FF9900">Talk to the hand!</font>]])</sup> 23:58, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

275661 +++$+++ Razorx +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275661 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-12 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.144879860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Razorx|RazorX]] 15:11, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
275662 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275661 +++$+++ 275661 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.144891020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 18:17, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
275663 +++$+++ Razorx +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275661 +++$+++ 275662 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.144900320E09 +++$+++ You are a lost cause Warrens. Like a politician you carefully avoided my points about your false licensing accusations for the tutorial. It's not a personal web site. It's actually one of the most comprehensive (took me days to put it together) tutorials on how to install IIS 5.1. It's such a major crime in trying to show people how to install and use IIS 5.1 isn't it Warrens..? And if one day the link is dead, then guess what genius? It gets removed, just like any Microsoft link would if they changed the address or removed it. I will contact Wikipedia admins, because your threats are false, and you are a bluffer. There are \"several\" articles within Wikipedia that have external links to tutorials and other resources. So you better get started on deleting ALL of those links too! One last thing before I let you go for good Warrens...the The [[Apache HTTP Server]] article has this tutorial link: Installing and configuring Apache on Windows XP - step-by-step tutorial describing virtual name-based hosting on Windows XP. If the Apache server article has one why can't IIS have one? Why? Because Warrens only dominates his personal little IIS article, that's why. So I guess folks, NO article at all in Wikipedia can have a link to ANY tutorial or ANY helpful resource according to Warrens the almighty. Please man, all of your arguments are so weak and simply drowning in self delusion and self justification. You are yet another person who can never be wrong. You're too \"hot headed\" Warrens and you can't be reasoned with. I've more than proven my points with sited facts rather than my personal opinions like you...such a waste.  +++$+++ ::You are a lost cause Warrens. Like a politician you carefully avoided my points about your false licensing accusations for the tutorial. It's not a personal web site. It's actually one of the most comprehensive (took me days to put it together) tutorials on how to install IIS 5.1. It's such a major crime in trying to show people how to install and use IIS 5.1 isn't it Warrens..? And if one day the link is dead, then guess what genius? It gets removed, just like any Microsoft link would if they changed the address or removed it. I will contact Wikipedia admins, because your threats are false, and you are a bluffer. There are "several" articles within Wikipedia that have external links to tutorials and other resources. So you better get started on deleting ALL of those links too! One last thing before I let you go for good Warrens...the The [[Apache HTTP Server]] article has this tutorial link: Installing and configuring Apache on Windows XP - step-by-step tutorial describing virtual name-based hosting on Windows XP. If the Apache server article has one why can't IIS have one? Why? Because Warrens only dominates his personal little IIS article, that's why. So I guess folks, NO article at all in Wikipedia can have a link to ANY tutorial or ANY helpful resource according to Warrens the almighty. Please man, all of your arguments are so weak and simply drowning in self delusion and self justification. You are yet another person who can never be wrong. You're too "hot headed" Warrens and you can't be reasoned with. I've more than proven my points with sited facts rather than my personal opinions like you...such a waste. [[User:Razorx|RazorX]] 20:52, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
275664 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275661 +++$+++ 275663 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.144901100E09 +++$+++ Again, I remind you that your time would be much better spent improving articles on Wikipedia than complaining about actions taken by other editors.  Only one of these two activities results in a better encyclopedia.   +++$+++ :::Again, I remind you that your time would be much better spent improving articles on Wikipedia than complaining about actions taken by other editors.  Only one of these two activities results in a better encyclopedia.  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 21:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

13518 +++$+++ Witch Hazzel +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13518 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.311145920E09 +++$+++ I'm starting to think you're a sock puppet.  You've supported everything miradre has done in very short order which isn't common at Wikipedia.  This may warrant further investigation and a heads up to the administrators.  +++$+++ I'm starting to think you're a sock puppet.  You've supported everything miradre has done in very short order which isn't common at Wikipedia.  This may warrant further investigation and a heads up to the administrators. [[User:Witch Hazzel|Witch Hazzel]] ([[User talk:Witch Hazzel|talk]]) 00:12, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
13519 +++$+++ Thecheesykid +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13518 +++$+++ 13518 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311145980E09 +++$+++ I'm not. I just have the page on my Watchlist. [[WP:AGF]]. ''' +++$+++ : I'm not. I just have the page on my Watchlist. [[WP:AGF]]. '''[[User:Thecheesykid|<font face="Bodoni MT" color="#669933">That Ole Cheesy Dude</font>]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Thecheesykid|<font face="Bodoni MT" color="#FF9900">Talk to the hand!</font>]])</sup> 00:13, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
13520 +++$+++ Thecheesykid +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13518 +++$+++ 13519 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.311147060E09 +++$+++ Wait, actually no, I got that wrong, I don't have this page on my Watchlist, I saw the edit on Huggle and came to investigate your claim. But no, frankly basing that type of accusation on one edit is preposterous. ''' +++$+++ :: Wait, actually no, I got that wrong, I don't have this page on my Watchlist, I saw the edit on Huggle and came to investigate your claim. But no, frankly basing that type of accusation on one edit is preposterous. '''[[User:Thecheesykid|<font face="Bodoni MT" color="#669933">That Ole Cheesy Dude</font>]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Thecheesykid|<font face="Bodoni MT" color="#FF9900">Talk to the hand!</font>]])</sup> 00:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

13521 +++$+++ Witch Hazzel +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.311147660E09 +++$+++ I still think that you so quickly responded is suspect.  Wikipedia seems to move a bit slower than that, in my experience.  +++$+++ I still think that you so quickly responded is suspect.  Wikipedia seems to move a bit slower than that, in my experience. [[User:Witch Hazzel|Witch Hazzel]] ([[User talk:Witch Hazzel|talk]]) 00:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
13522 +++$+++ Thecheesykid +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13521 +++$+++ 13521 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.311147780E09 +++$+++ I'm not Wikipedia. ''' +++$+++ : I'm not Wikipedia. '''[[User:Thecheesykid|<font face="Bodoni MT" color="#669933">That Ole Cheesy Dude</font>]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Thecheesykid|<font face="Bodoni MT" color="#FF9900">Talk to the hand!</font>]])</sup> 00:43, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

275666 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-15 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.145119860E09 +++$+++ Hi, in some images that has been uploaded (I do not remember which), I saw that Paul Turrot has given permission to use the screenshots he uses in his articles. Does that mean any of his images can be uploaded? Because these two screenshots [http:\/\/www.winsupersite.com\/images\/reviews\/vista_5342_rev_14.jpg] and [http:\/\/www.winsupersite.com\/images\/showcase\/vista_5342_15.jpg], if used in the [[Features new to Windows Vista]] would be good, I feel, as no other articles show these pics. --[[User:Soumyasch|<font color=\"green\">so<\/font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color=\"red\">U<\/font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color=\"green\">m<\/font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color=\"red\">'''y'''<\/font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color=\"green\">a<\/font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color=\"red\">S<\/font>]] +++$+++ Hi, in some images that has been uploaded (I do not remember which), I saw that Paul Turrot has given permission to use the screenshots he uses in his articles. Does that mean any of his images can be uploaded? Because these two screenshots [http://www.winsupersite.com/images/reviews/vista_5342_rev_14.jpg] and [http://www.winsupersite.com/images/showcase/vista_5342_15.jpg], if used in the [[Features new to Windows Vista]] would be good, I feel, as no other articles show these pics. --[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">so</font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="red">U</font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">m</font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="red">'''y'''</font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="red">S</font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">ch</font>]] 09:51, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
275667 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275666 +++$+++ 275666 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.145149980E09 +++$+++ Hey.  I'd asked for permission to use a few screenshots for older builds of Longhorn that would be extremely difficult for us to make on our own.  I'm of the opinion that we try to should avoid using other people's screenshots for newer builds, if at all possible.  I have a hunch that we'll be replacing all these images in the coming months anyhow, so for the time being, just do what you like and we'll work from there.  The Microsoft-sanctioned PR image for WPG isn't very good, so it'd be nice to replace it.   +++$+++ :Hey.  I'd asked for permission to use a few screenshots for older builds of Longhorn that would be extremely difficult for us to make on our own.  I'm of the opinion that we try to should avoid using other people's screenshots for newer builds, if at all possible.  I have a hunch that we'll be replacing all these images in the coming months anyhow, so for the time being, just do what you like and we'll work from there.  The Microsoft-sanctioned PR image for WPG isn't very good, so it'd be nice to replace it.  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 18:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

13523 +++$+++ Witch Hazzel +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.311148080E09 +++$+++ I know you're not wikipedia.....you're miradre!!!  +++$+++ I know you're not wikipedia.....you're miradre!!! [[User:Witch Hazzel|Witch Hazzel]] ([[User talk:Witch Hazzel|talk]]) 00:48, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
13524 +++$+++ Thecheesykid +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13523 +++$+++ 13523 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311148140E09 +++$+++ If you truly believe me to be a sockpuppet, then you can take it to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets]]. But I doubt you'll get much joy. ''' +++$+++ : If you truly believe me to be a sockpuppet, then you can take it to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets]]. But I doubt you'll get much joy. '''[[User:Thecheesykid|<font face="Bodoni MT" color="#669933">That Ole Cheesy Dude</font>]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Thecheesykid|<font face="Bodoni MT" color="#FF9900">Talk to the hand!</font>]])</sup> 00:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

275668 +++$+++ Jrockley +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275668 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-11 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.144806720E09 +++$+++ I would like to see an obvious statment along with each new technology whether or not it will be madecavaidable to previous versions of windows. Perhaps a single bullet point at the end of each subheading's paragraph stating \"IE7 will be avaidable to all windows OSs\" or \"WinFX will be avaidable to XP\" etc. It could also be helpful if the article were to state all those that are unique to Vista (like aero). Thoughts?  +++$+++ I would like to see an obvious statment along with each new technology whether or not it will be madecavaidable to previous versions of windows. Perhaps a single bullet point at the end of each subheading's paragraph stating "IE7 will be avaidable to all windows OSs" or "WinFX will be avaidable to XP" etc. It could also be helpful if the article were to state all those that are unique to Vista (like aero). Thoughts? [[User:Jrockley|mastodon]] 18:52, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
275669 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275668 +++$+++ 275668 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.144810140E09 +++$+++ As the name of the article suggests, pretty much everything listed on this page is going to be unique to Vista.  There's no good reason to weigh down this article with all sorts of semantics about whether or not a described feature is going to be available in other operating systems as well... there are other articles where this would be more suitable.   +++$+++ :As the name of the article suggests, pretty much everything listed on this page is going to be unique to Vista.  There's no good reason to weigh down this article with all sorts of semantics about whether or not a described feature is going to be available in other operating systems as well... there are other articles where this would be more suitable.  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 19:49, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
275670 +++$+++ Jrockley +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275668 +++$+++ 275669 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.144826280E09 +++$+++ OK, OK, I see your point. I was just wondering about those that will be avaidable to XP. I have heard through the grapevine that WinFX will be backported, and IE7 is suitable for all Windows versions. Is this true? If so, I would like to see it clear in the article.  +++$+++ ::OK, OK, I see your point. I was just wondering about those that will be avaidable to XP. I have heard through the grapevine that WinFX will be backported, and IE7 is suitable for all Windows versions. Is this true? If so, I would like to see it clear in the article. [[User:Jrockley|mastodon]] 00:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
275671 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275668 +++$+++ 275670 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.144830060E09 +++$+++ WinFX and IE7 aren't being \"[[Backporting|backported]]\".  They are being designed for and released for the NT 5.x platforms and Vista in the same general timeframe.  The [[.NET Framework 3.0|WinFX]], [[WinFS]], [[Windows Defender]], [[Internet Explorer]], and [[Windows Driver Foundation]] articles all note the wider availability of these features which will also be in Vista.  +++$+++ :::WinFX and IE7 aren't being "[[Backporting|backported]]".  They are being designed for and released for the NT 5.x platforms and Vista in the same general timeframe.  The [[.NET Framework 3.0|WinFX]], [[WinFS]], [[Windows Defender]], [[Internet Explorer]], and [[Windows Driver Foundation]] articles all note the wider availability of these features which will also be in Vista. [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 01:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
275672 +++$+++ Jrockley +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275668 +++$+++ 275671 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.145056980E09 +++$+++ Right, thankyou, thats cool. One last question: will they all be made avaidable through [[Windows Update]]? Possibly as a service pack?  +++$+++ ::::Right, thankyou, thats cool. One last question: will they all be made avaidable through [[Windows Update]]? Possibly as a service pack? [[User:Jrockley|mastodon]] 16:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

13526 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-30 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312079040E09 +++$+++ Although I'm afraid I don't have as much time for volunteering on Wikipedia at the moment as I used to (and will again, when my current job contract expires), I am always happy to talk about rewrites, and I have a number of \"talk page stalkers\" who are generally very knowledgeable and helpful. If you ever have any concerns about whether content is properly rewritten or just want to talk about copyright stuff, you are welcome to come by my page. -- +++$+++ Although I'm afraid I don't have as much time for volunteering on Wikipedia at the moment as I used to (and will again, when my current job contract expires), I am always happy to talk about rewrites, and I have a number of "talk page stalkers" who are generally very knowledgeable and helpful. If you ever have any concerns about whether content is properly rewritten or just want to talk about copyright stuff, you are welcome to come by my page. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 19:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
13527 +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13526 +++$+++ 13526 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312153320E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your informative post. I certainly agree that citing sources correctly and avoiding copyright problems is very important. I may have done some mistakes regarding this in that past and I will try to improve. Regading Mathsci, I and others have already commented regarding his continued harrassment of me. +++$+++ :Thank you for your informative post. I certainly agree that citing sources correctly and avoiding copyright problems is very important. I may have done some mistakes regarding this in that past and I will try to improve. Regading Mathsci, I and others have already commented regarding his continued harrassment of me.[[User:Miradre|Miradre]] ([[User talk:Miradre#top|talk]]) 16:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

570233 +++$+++ GregManninLB +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-20 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.208728740E09 +++$+++ Hi David. There are a huge number of [[:Category:Wikipedia image placeholders|artice space place holders]] that are used on article space. Your thoughts at [[Wikipedia:Centralized discussion\/Image placeholders]] on this would be most appreciated. Also, if you know of others who largely are responsible for the appearance of article space, please let them know about the Wikipedia:Centralized discussion\/Image placeholders discussion. Further, is there a top level WikiProject that deals with article space appearance? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi David. There are a huge number of [[:Category:Wikipedia image placeholders|artice space place holders]] that are used on article space. Your thoughts at [[Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders]] on this would be most appreciated. Also, if you know of others who largely are responsible for the appearance of article space, please let them know about the Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders discussion. Further, is there a top level WikiProject that deals with article space appearance? Thanks. [[User:GregManninLB|GregManninLB]] ([[User talk:GregManninLB|talk]]) 14:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
570234 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570233 +++$+++ 570233 +++$+++ 2008-04-22 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.208847960E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 00:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

13528 +++$+++ Roscelese +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312206360E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your effort to seek consensus through a merge proposal before merging [[Motivation for rape]] to [[Causes of sexual violence]], but as you are no doubt aware, no one participated in the discussion, meaning that while there was no articulated consensus against it, there was also no consensus for it. May I recommend undoing the merge for now, re-opening the discussion, and seeking wider input at the relatively large number of WikiProjects that handle those articles?  +++$+++ I appreciate your effort to seek consensus through a merge proposal before merging [[Motivation for rape]] to [[Causes of sexual violence]], but as you are no doubt aware, no one participated in the discussion, meaning that while there was no articulated consensus against it, there was also no consensus for it. May I recommend undoing the merge for now, re-opening the discussion, and seeking wider input at the relatively large number of WikiProjects that handle those articles? [[User:Roscelese|Roscelese]] ([[User talk:Roscelese|talk]] &sdot; [[Special:Contributions/Roscelese|contribs]]) 06:46, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13529 +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13528 +++$+++ 13528 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.312211820E09 +++$+++ Hi. I notice that Mathsci has approached you on this issue. Mathsci has a history of following me around Wikipedia and opposing me on topics he never has been interested in before as well as trying to report me or articles I edit for various claimed problems. If there are any concrete points regarding the article in question, please raise them on the talk page of the article. The correct merge procedure was followed and I waited 10 days for any objections.  +++$+++ :Hi. I notice that Mathsci has approached you on this issue. Mathsci has a history of following me around Wikipedia and opposing me on topics he never has been interested in before as well as trying to report me or articles I edit for various claimed problems. If there are any concrete points regarding the article in question, please raise them on the talk page of the article. The correct merge procedure was followed and I waited 10 days for any objections. [[User:Miradre|Miradre]] ([[User talk:Miradre#top|talk]]) 08:17, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13530 +++$+++ Mathsci +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13528 +++$+++ 13529 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312214040E09 +++$+++ There was no consensus for the merge. Please undo it on both pages and request opinions from the wikiprojects listed on [[Talk:Motivation for rape]]. If your edits appear not to follow wikipedia guidelines, other users will monitor them.  +++$+++ ::There was no consensus for the merge. Please undo it on both pages and request opinions from the wikiprojects listed on [[Talk:Motivation for rape]]. If your edits appear not to follow wikipedia guidelines, other users will monitor them. [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 08:54, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13531 +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13528 +++$+++ 13530 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.312228860E09 +++$+++ Again, the correct merge procedure was followed. State any objections regarding the articles on the talk page. Stop following me around Wikipedia to topics you have never been interested in simply to oppose whatever I do. +++$+++ :::Again, the correct merge procedure was followed. State any objections regarding the articles on the talk page. Stop following me around Wikipedia to topics you have never been interested in simply to oppose whatever I do.[[User:Miradre|Miradre]] ([[User talk:Miradre#top|talk]]) 13:01, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13532 +++$+++ Mathsci +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13528 +++$+++ 13531 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.312229640E09 +++$+++ The best way forward for you is to do as Roscelese advises: revert your merge and seek more input at the pages of the wikiprojects. If you think that this suggestion is against policy, feel free to raise the question on [[WP:ANI]].  +++$+++ ::::The best way forward for you is to do as Roscelese advises: revert your merge and seek more input at the pages of the wikiprojects. If you think that this suggestion is against policy, feel free to raise the question on [[WP:ANI]]. [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 13:14, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13533 +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13528 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312230060E09 +++$+++ The correct merge procedure was followed. Again, raise any objections on the relevant talk page. Stop stalking me. +++$+++ ::::::The correct merge procedure was followed. Again, raise any objections on the relevant talk page. Stop stalking me.[[User:Miradre|Miradre]] ([[User talk:Miradre#top|talk]]) 13:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13534 +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13528 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.312231200E09 +++$+++ I followed all the instructions in [[WP:MERGE]]. Furthermore, no one has raised any concrete objections to the merge. Either during the ten day wait or now. Also, my talk page is not the correct place to discuss content issues. Do not discuss the issue here. I will remove further replies. Continue any objections on the talk page of the articles. +++$+++ ::::::I followed all the instructions in [[WP:MERGE]]. Furthermore, no one has raised any concrete objections to the merge. Either during the ten day wait or now. Also, my talk page is not the correct place to discuss content issues. Do not discuss the issue here. I will remove further replies. Continue any objections on the talk page of the articles.[[User:Miradre|Miradre]] ([[User talk:Miradre#top|talk]]) 13:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

613924 +++$+++ TParis00ap +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-25 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.256523000E09 +++$+++ Hello.  One of the editors on this page has a neutrality concern about the use of \"pseudoscientific\" in the first sentance of this article.  Could you please join the discussion on their [[User_talk:Thalia14#Icons_of_Evolution|talk page]]?  Thanks.-- +++$+++ Hello.  One of the editors on this page has a neutrality concern about the use of "pseudoscientific" in the first sentance of this article.  Could you please join the discussion on their [[User_talk:Thalia14#Icons_of_Evolution|talk page]]?  Thanks.--[[User:TParis00ap|TParis00ap]] ([[User talk:TParis00ap|talk]]) 19:10, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
613925 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613924 +++$+++ 613924 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.256528820E09 +++$+++ Tnanks for the heads-up, have done. .  +++$+++ :Tnanks for the heads-up, have done. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
613926 +++$+++ Aunt Entropy +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613924 +++$+++ 613924 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.256800620E09 +++$+++ She's using the talk page now at least, but is seeming to ignore everything I say while quoting me on stuff I don't say. Treading into IDIDNTHEARTHAT territory. What am I saying, treading? More like divebombing...  +++$+++ :She's using the talk page now at least, but is seeming to ignore everything I say while quoting me on stuff I don't say. Treading into IDIDNTHEARTHAT territory. What am I saying, treading? More like divebombing... [[User talk:Aunt Entropy|<font color="483D8B" face="lucida blackletter">Auntie E.</font>]] 00:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
613927 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613924 +++$+++ 613926 +++$+++ 2009-10-29 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.256801940E09 +++$+++ It's the creationist mindset, it's long past bedtime in Glasgow Herald territory, but I've added a couple of comments. Relax and forget the nonsense, which will get stomped on by many able editors. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]]  +++$+++ ::It's the creationist mindset, it's long past bedtime in Glasgow Herald territory, but I've added a couple of comments. Relax and forget the nonsense, which will get stomped on by many able editors. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], 00:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

275674 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-19 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.145450400E09 +++$+++ Like there are separate articles for the different editions of Win XP (Media center edition, x64 edition et al), do you think there is should be separate articles for the different versions of Windows server 2003 (Datacenter edition, enterprise edn, storage server edn etc)? Or should the relevant sections in the [[Windows Server 2003]] article be expanded? I think doing the latter will make the article bloated. --[[User:Soumyasch|<font color=\"green\">so<\/font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color=\"red\">U<\/font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color=\"green\">m<\/font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color=\"red\">'''y'''<\/font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color=\"green\">a<\/font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color=\"red\">S<\/font>]] +++$+++ Like there are separate articles for the different editions of Win XP (Media center edition, x64 edition et al), do you think there is should be separate articles for the different versions of Windows server 2003 (Datacenter edition, enterprise edn, storage server edn etc)? Or should the relevant sections in the [[Windows Server 2003]] article be expanded? I think doing the latter will make the article bloated. --[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">so</font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="red">U</font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">m</font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="red">'''y'''</font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="red">S</font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">ch</font>]] 05:40, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
275675 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275674 +++$+++ 275674 +++$+++ 2006-04-19 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.145500440E09 +++$+++ I think this played itself out in the Windows 2000 articles, with the end result being that everything got redirected back to the main Windows 2000 article, because there wasn't enough unique information.  We should probably follow that lead, and think more in terms of expanding the existing Windows Server 2003 article to properly discuss every edition.  If that article gets really big then yeah, we can make break-out articles, but we're really quite a long ways away from that right now.   +++$+++ :I think this played itself out in the Windows 2000 articles, with the end result being that everything got redirected back to the main Windows 2000 article, because there wasn't enough unique information.  We should probably follow that lead, and think more in terms of expanding the existing Windows Server 2003 article to properly discuss every edition.  If that article gets really big then yeah, we can make break-out articles, but we're really quite a long ways away from that right now.  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 19:34, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

275676 +++$+++ Jpgordon +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-24 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.145917800E09 +++$+++ It is quite nice to welcome new editors, but perhaps it's not the best thing to give such a happy welcome to editors who have done nothing but vandalize (for example, [[User:Good2]].) Thoughts? -- +++$+++ It is quite nice to welcome new editors, but perhaps it's not the best thing to give such a happy welcome to editors who have done nothing but vandalize (for example, [[User:Good2]].) Thoughts? --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]][[User talk:Jpgordon|&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710;]] 15:30, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
275677 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275676 +++$+++ 275676 +++$+++ 2006-04-24 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.145918880E09 +++$+++ It's really important that we [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|don't bite the newcomers]].  Many esteemed editors started out doing silly things, and Wikipedia will benefit from having users stick around and \"get\" what we're trying to do here, rather than be turned off the process forever.  Welcome messages help to ensure that the important policies are placed in front of a new editor, and it's better to try and fail, rather than not try at all.   +++$+++ :It's really important that we [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|don't bite the newcomers]].  Many esteemed editors started out doing silly things, and Wikipedia will benefit from having users stick around and "get" what we're trying to do here, rather than be turned off the process forever.  Welcome messages help to ensure that the important policies are placed in front of a new editor, and it's better to try and fail, rather than not try at all.  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 15:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

122657 +++$+++ RJC +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ 122657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-09 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.286665560E09 +++$+++ Hi.  Thanks for cleaning up [[Tacitus]].  Please be more careful, though, about changing dates without ensuring that the date there is wrong.  Tacitus died in 68, not 1968. ''' +++$+++ Hi.  Thanks for cleaning up [[Tacitus]].  Please be more careful, though, about changing dates without ensuring that the date there is wrong.  Tacitus died in 68, not 1968. '''[[User:RJC|<span style="background:#CEFFCE;color:#0000C6;font-family:Garamond">RJC</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:RJC|<span style="color:#0000C6">Talk</span>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/RJC|<span style="color:#0000C6">Contribs</span>]]</sub> 16:06, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
122658 +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ 122657 +++$+++ 122657 +++$+++ 2010-10-09 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.286665680E09 +++$+++ Oops! Very sorry. Thanks for sorting my mess out.  +++$+++ :Oops! Very sorry. Thanks for sorting my mess out. [[User:Gaius Cornelius|Gaius Cornelius]] ([[User talk:Gaius Cornelius#top|talk]]) 16:08, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

13535 +++$+++ Roscelese +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13535 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.312351980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your response, Miradre. I personally haven't looked over the \"before\" and \"after\" of the merge, so I don't express an opinion on whether it was good or bad, and I'm unaware of the problems between you and Mathsci, so if there's harassment going on I'm sorry to have been a proxy to it, but I still maintain that in the absence of any talkpage discussion, seeking input at WikiProjects would have been a good idea, from a process point of view.  +++$+++ Thanks for your response, Miradre. I personally haven't looked over the "before" and "after" of the merge, so I don't express an opinion on whether it was good or bad, and I'm unaware of the problems between you and Mathsci, so if there's harassment going on I'm sorry to have been a proxy to it, but I still maintain that in the absence of any talkpage discussion, seeking input at WikiProjects would have been a good idea, from a process point of view. [[User:Roscelese|Roscelese]] ([[User talk:Roscelese|talk]] &sdot; [[Special:Contributions/Roscelese|contribs]]) 23:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13536 +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ Miradre +++$+++ 13535 +++$+++ 13535 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.312648260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply. I followed [[WP:MERGE]] and contacting any Wikiprojekt is not mentioned. No one has had any concrete objections. Either during the ten day wait or now. Please raise any further issues on the talk page of the articles. +++$+++ :Thanks for your reply. I followed [[WP:MERGE]] and contacting any Wikiprojekt is not mentioned. No one has had any concrete objections. Either during the ten day wait or now. Please raise any further issues on the talk page of the articles.[[User:Miradre|Miradre]] ([[User talk:Miradre#top|talk]]) 09:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

13538 +++$+++ SpecMode +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-02 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.265156520E09 +++$+++ Just a quick stop by to thank you for the great job you're doing in adding missing ship photos for practically every US Naval ship in history.  Bravo Zulu!   +++$+++ Just a quick stop by to thank you for the great job you're doing in adding missing ship photos for practically every US Naval ship in history.  Bravo Zulu!  [[User:SpecMode|SpecMode]] ([[User talk:SpecMode|talk]]) 16:22, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
13539 +++$+++ Hga +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13538 +++$+++ 13538 +++$+++ 2010-02-05 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.265394900E09 +++$+++ Yeah!  You just added my father's ship, the [[USS Searcher (AGR-4)]].  Much appreciated!   +++$+++ :Yeah!  You just added my father's ship, the [[USS Searcher (AGR-4)]].  Much appreciated!  [[User:Hga|Hga]] ([[User talk:Hga|talk]]) 10:35, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
13540 +++$+++ Hga +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13538 +++$+++ 13539 +++$+++ 2010-02-05 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.265440980E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome, and my father really appreciated it as well.  After I forwarded him the link, he walked me through the deck of the ship, from the funny forward housing that includes the forward 3 inch gun (needed to be able to discourage frisky Soviet \"fishing trawlers\", I suspect) to the big rear RADAR, an up and down \"waggler\" that was used to determine the height of targets (needless to say, Soviet bombers didn't have transponders that returned their altitude :-).   +++$+++ ::You're very welcome, and my father really appreciated it as well.  After I forwarded him the link, he walked me through the deck of the ship, from the funny forward housing that includes the forward 3 inch gun (needed to be able to discourage frisky Soviet "fishing trawlers", I suspect) to the big rear RADAR, an up and down "waggler" that was used to determine the height of targets (needless to say, Soviet bombers didn't have transponders that returned their altitude :-).  [[User:Hga|Hga]] ([[User talk:Hga|talk]]) 23:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

537827 +++$+++ Cbdorsett +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537827 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-27 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.180300380E09 +++$+++ You know, it's okay for non-native speakers to contribute to Wikipedia in English. Clean up the content and the grammar, but try not to dish out personal insults at the same time. It doesn't help.  +++$+++ You know, it's okay for non-native speakers to contribute to Wikipedia in English. Clean up the content and the grammar, but try not to dish out personal insults at the same time. It doesn't help. [[User:Cbdorsett|Cbdorsett]] 14:13, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
537828 +++$+++ Cbdorsett +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537827 +++$+++ 537827 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.180304040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your quick reply. Let me know if you think it would help for me to write to him\/her.  +++$+++ : Thanks for your quick reply. Let me know if you think it would help for me to write to him/her. [[User:Cbdorsett|Cbdorsett]] 15:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

275684 +++$+++ IstvanWolf +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-04 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.146745260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the tip.  How come I sometimes come across pages where the trailing 's' is left off (or am I confusing that with the 's situation)?  +++$+++ Thanks for the tip.  How come I sometimes come across pages where the trailing 's' is left off (or am I confusing that with the 's situation)? [[User:IstvanWolf|IstvanWolf]] 05:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
275685 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275684 +++$+++ 275684 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.146745740E09 +++$+++ Perhaps... Mediawiki hasn't always included the trailing s when making links like I described, and many people aren't familiar with this particular shortcut yet.  As for article names, they will almost always be singular instead of plural so that it's easier to write sigular-form wikilinks to them.  Take [[Typeface]] for instance: if the article were named [[Typefaces]], but you wanted to use the word \"typeface\" in singular form, you'd have to write <nowiki>[[typefaces|typeface]]<\/nowiki> to get it to display correctly... which is rather ugly. :-)   +++$+++ :Perhaps... Mediawiki hasn't always included the trailing s when making links like I described, and many people aren't familiar with this particular shortcut yet.  As for article names, they will almost always be singular instead of plural so that it's easier to write sigular-form wikilinks to them.  Take [[Typeface]] for instance: if the article were named [[Typefaces]], but you wanted to use the word "typeface" in singular form, you'd have to write <nowiki>[[typefaces|typeface]]</nowiki> to get it to display correctly... which is rather ugly. :-)  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 05:29, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

13542 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-03 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.267603560E09 +++$+++ This was deleted as a result of an expired PROD rather than an AFD. Cheers,  +++$+++ This was deleted as a result of an expired PROD rather than an AFD. Cheers, [[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#00ff00">  Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#bb00bb">cierekim''' </font>]] 00:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
13543 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13542 +++$+++ 13542 +++$+++ 2010-03-03 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.267655520E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Dlohcierekim&action=historysubmit&diff=347512688&oldid=347462023 Thanks, I'll look again.] +++$+++ *[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dlohcierekim&action=historysubmit&diff=347512688&oldid=347462023 Thanks, I'll look again.][[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#00ff00">  Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#bb00bb">cierekim''' </font>]] 14:32, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
13544 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13542 +++$+++ 13542 +++$+++ 2010-03-03 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.267655640E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Undelete\/Carpal_Therapist|Nope, ProD only.]] +++$+++ *[[Special:Undelete/Carpal_Therapist|Nope, ProD only.]][[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#00ff00">  Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#bb00bb">cierekim''' </font>]] 14:34, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

395473 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ 395473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.202958480E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 19:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
395474 +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ 395473 +++$+++ 395473 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.205349780E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image:300_comic.jpg&diff=192163858&oldid=191199407 Fixed] by [[User:Blathnaid|Blathnaid]].  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:300_comic.jpg&diff=192163858&oldid=191199407 Fixed] by [[User:Blathnaid|Blathnaid]]. [[User:Grendelkhan|grendel]]|[[User_talk:Grendelkhan|khan]] 12:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

537833 +++$+++ Deryck Chan +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.180620720E09 +++$+++ I wonder following what process or which discussion did you decide to ban {{user|Instantnood}}? Just feel that the process involved in this case is quite unusual. -- +++$+++ I wonder following what process or which discussion did you decide to ban {{user|Instantnood}}? Just feel that the process involved in this case is quite unusual. --[[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 07:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
537834 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537833 +++$+++ 537833 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.180769160E09 +++$+++ You're calling for quite an effort by asking me to remember the exact modalities of a block that took place no less than six weeks ago; anyways it was following a discussion on the [[WP:AN\/I]], involving me, Seraphimblade and Rlevse. Information of the indefinite ban was also given to the last ArbCom dispute involving Instantnood [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Instantnood_3&diff=prev&oldid=123292953]. This ban was fully legitimate, as [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Instantnood 3]] and per process as \"Any three administrators may, for good cause, ban him from the site.\"-- +++$+++ :You're calling for quite an effort by asking me to remember the exact modalities of a block that took place no less than six weeks ago; anyways it was following a discussion on the [[WP:AN/I]], involving me, Seraphimblade and Rlevse. Information of the indefinite ban was also given to the last ArbCom dispute involving Instantnood [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Instantnood_3&diff=prev&oldid=123292953]. This ban was fully legitimate, as [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Instantnood 3]] and per process as "Any three administrators may, for good cause, ban him from the site."--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 00:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

13546 +++$+++ SmashTheState +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13546 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-15 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.268708580E09 +++$+++ Did you do any research other than reading the article to come to the conclusion that Anne Feeney isn't notable?  I'm curious what motivated you to PROD this article, other than you, personally, not having heard of her.  It's not a very good article, but given that anyone familiar with folk music (or traditional labour fight songs) has heard of her, I'm wondering how you came to the conclusion that she isn't notable.  Folk singers tend not to leave large electronic footprints.  A Google search probably isn't going to be good enough to establish her notability within her field.   +++$+++ Did you do any research other than reading the article to come to the conclusion that Anne Feeney isn't notable?  I'm curious what motivated you to PROD this article, other than you, personally, not having heard of her.  It's not a very good article, but given that anyone familiar with folk music (or traditional labour fight songs) has heard of her, I'm wondering how you came to the conclusion that she isn't notable.  Folk singers tend not to leave large electronic footprints.  A Google search probably isn't going to be good enough to establish her notability within her field.  [[User:SmashTheState|SmashTheState]] ([[User talk:SmashTheState|talk]]) 20:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
13547 +++$+++ SmashTheState +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13546 +++$+++ 13546 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.268794260E09 +++$+++ The nature of folk music is that it's not going to be closely connected to the Internet.  In order to judge whether or not Anne Feeney is notable, one would have to have specific knowledge of her field.  Have you done any non-Internet research?  Perhaps consulted people who may be qualified to judge her notability?  I would suggest to you that a Google search is far from the best way to judge notability, and that it might have been a good idea to, at the very least, consult with some related Wikipedia projects (such as the Organized Labour portal) who might have specific knowledge of the subject of the article in question.  +++$+++ :The nature of folk music is that it's not going to be closely connected to the Internet.  In order to judge whether or not Anne Feeney is notable, one would have to have specific knowledge of her field.  Have you done any non-Internet research?  Perhaps consulted people who may be qualified to judge her notability?  I would suggest to you that a Google search is far from the best way to judge notability, and that it might have been a good idea to, at the very least, consult with some related Wikipedia projects (such as the Organized Labour portal) who might have specific knowledge of the subject of the article in question. [[User:SmashTheState|SmashTheState]] ([[User talk:SmashTheState|talk]]) 19:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

13548 +++$+++ Shreevatsa +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13548 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-23 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.269393120E09 +++$+++ Why don't you like it? :-)  +++$+++ Why don't you like it? :-) [[User:Shreevatsa|Shreevatsa]] ([[User talk:Shreevatsa|talk]]) 18:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
13549 +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13548 +++$+++ 13548 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.269394200E09 +++$+++ Were you speaking of a specific article?  +++$+++ : Were you speaking of a specific article? [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah|talk]]) 18:30, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
13550 +++$+++ Shreevatsa +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13548 +++$+++ 13549 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.269395280E09 +++$+++ I disagree that it's almost never right. See [http:\/\/www.google.com\/archivesearch?q=co-conspirator News Archive]; it has mentions going back to the 1920s. The OED has references from 1863 and 1866 (\"Mr. Bright and his co-conspirators\"). I think what you're doing is a case of [[hypercorrection]], \"fixing\" something that isn't wrong. In particular, why do you think \"his fellow conspirators\" is better than \"his co-conspirators\"? I can understand if it's just your personal preference, but \"not right\" is wrong.  +++$+++ :: I disagree that it's almost never right. See [http://www.google.com/archivesearch?q=co-conspirator News Archive]; it has mentions going back to the 1920s. The OED has references from 1863 and 1866 ("Mr. Bright and his co-conspirators"). I think what you're doing is a case of [[hypercorrection]], "fixing" something that isn't wrong. In particular, why do you think "his fellow conspirators" is better than "his co-conspirators"? I can understand if it's just your personal preference, but "not right" is wrong. [[User:Shreevatsa|Shreevatsa]] ([[User talk:Shreevatsa|talk]]) 18:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
13551 +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13548 +++$+++ 13550 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.269395760E09 +++$+++ You may be right that it is hypercorrection, but I stand by my statement that it is wrong in the singular \"X is a co-conspirator in Y plot\" as I said, it is potentially correct in the particular that you mention (fellow conspirator vs. co-conspirator) but no more so than fellow conspirator, that is just a stylistic preference.  As for the news archives, just because a journalist uses it, doesnt mean that it is right, although Im curious what the OED has to say beyond when it was used.  +++$+++ :::You may be right that it is hypercorrection, but I stand by my statement that it is wrong in the singular "X is a co-conspirator in Y plot" as I said, it is potentially correct in the particular that you mention (fellow conspirator vs. co-conspirator) but no more so than fellow conspirator, that is just a stylistic preference.  As for the news archives, just because a journalist uses it, doesnt mean that it is right, although Im curious what the OED has to say beyond when it was used. [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah#top|talk]]) 18:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
13552 +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13548 +++$+++ 13550 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.269396480E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Herman_Frank_Cash&diff=351601992&oldid=330049666 this] is a good example of what I mean when I say its almost never right, as in, most usages of it are wrong, as opposed to there are no instances where it is right.  +++$+++ :::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Herman_Frank_Cash&diff=351601992&oldid=330049666 this] is a good example of what I mean when I say its almost never right, as in, most usages of it are wrong, as opposed to there are no instances where it is right. [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah#top|talk]]) 19:08, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
13553 +++$+++ Shreevatsa +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13548 +++$+++ 13552 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.269397500E09 +++$+++ I agree with you that on its own, \"X was a co-conspirator in\u2026\" seems redundant, and certainly I prefer \"conspirator\". (I wouldn't say it's wrong, and it can even have a useful clarifying purpose, or draw attention to the existence of others: apparently, \"lone conspirator\" has been used too, e.g. \"Hoover names Oswald 'lone conspirator'\".) [[Unindicted co-conspirator]] is the usual legal term, and \"co-conspirator\" [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?q=co-conspirator also] is used more generally (where \"accomplice\" may be used). The difference from \"partner\" is that \"partner\" is used as a relationship term, like \"classmate\" (you can say \"my partner\" but not \"my conspirator\"), but when talking of partners in a firm, even [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?q=copartner copartner] exists (to mean \"another partner\", \"fellow partner\", etc). The OED doesn't say much (it's under co-), but it says \"It is sometimes prefixed to words of L. origin which are already compounded with com- (con-), as co-connexion, -conspirator, -constituent\" and later it gives two usage examples of co-conspirator, along with words like co-actor, co-discoverer, co-rival, co-traitor, and co-villager. Anyway, it's a matter of preference, so there's not much to discuss... we just need to be careful not to change \"his co-conspirators\" to \"his conspirators\", etc. Regards,  +++$+++ :::: I agree with you that on its own, "X was a co-conspirator in…" seems redundant, and certainly I prefer "conspirator". (I wouldn't say it's wrong, and it can even have a useful clarifying purpose, or draw attention to the existence of others: apparently, "lone conspirator" has been used too, e.g. "Hoover names Oswald 'lone conspirator'".) [[Unindicted co-conspirator]] is the usual legal term, and "co-conspirator" [http://books.google.com/books?q=co-conspirator also] is used more generally (where "accomplice" may be used). The difference from "partner" is that "partner" is used as a relationship term, like "classmate" (you can say "my partner" but not "my conspirator"), but when talking of partners in a firm, even [http://books.google.com/books?q=copartner copartner] exists (to mean "another partner", "fellow partner", etc). The OED doesn't say much (it's under co-), but it says "It is sometimes prefixed to words of L. origin which are already compounded with com- (con-), as co-connexion, -conspirator, -constituent" and later it gives two usage examples of co-conspirator, along with words like co-actor, co-discoverer, co-rival, co-traitor, and co-villager. Anyway, it's a matter of preference, so there's not much to discuss... we just need to be careful not to change "his co-conspirators" to "his conspirators", etc. Regards, [[User:Shreevatsa|Shreevatsa]] ([[User talk:Shreevatsa|talk]]) 19:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
13554 +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13548 +++$+++ 13553 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.269398040E09 +++$+++ I agree with the last part (not changing \"his co-conspirators\" to \"his conspirators\"), i definitely dont buy the lone conspirator line, but Im guessing that isnt going to come up except as maybe a quote.  Regards.  +++$+++ :::::I agree with the last part (not changing "his co-conspirators" to "his conspirators"), i definitely dont buy the lone conspirator line, but Im guessing that isnt going to come up except as maybe a quote.  Regards. [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah#top|talk]]) 19:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

275697 +++$+++ AlistairMcMillan +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275697 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-13 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.147584120E09 +++$+++ Anyway rant over, to specifically comment on your exact question.  The problem with \"not publicly available yet\" is that it doesn't apply to Boot Camp or Internet Explorer 7.  Perhaps \"final version not publicly available yet\", but like I said, I'm opposed to the template as a whole.   +++$+++ Anyway rant over, to specifically comment on your exact question.  The problem with "not publicly available yet" is that it doesn't apply to Boot Camp or Internet Explorer 7.  Perhaps "final version not publicly available yet", but like I said, I'm opposed to the template as a whole.  [[User:AlistairMcMillan|AlistairMcMillan]] 22:22, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
275698 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275697 +++$+++ 275697 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.147591860E09 +++$+++ I don't feel strongly about the template one way or the other (though I'd probably support its deletion), but I'm probably going to remove the future software template from the Vista-related articles when a public beta becomes available.   +++$+++ :I don't feel strongly about the template one way or the other (though I'd probably support its deletion), but I'm probably going to remove the future software template from the Vista-related articles when a public beta becomes available.  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 00:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

611484 +++$+++ Ng.j +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-02 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.304397720E09 +++$+++ Need your help here.  +++$+++ Need your help here. [[User:Ng.j|Ng.j]] ([[User talk:Ng.j|talk]]) 21:42, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
611485 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611484 +++$+++ 611484 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.304399640E09 +++$+++ I'm on it!  +++$+++ :I'm on it! [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 22:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

275699 +++$+++ Sasquatch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-15 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.147752360E09 +++$+++ I sprotected the page again. no use blocking as the IP is changing daily. Just ignore the other guy's rhetoric. It's been stated over and over and has gotten no support (i.e. we're right, (s)he's wrong). Remember to [[Wikipedia:Do not feed the trolls]]. ''' +++$+++ I sprotected the page again. no use blocking as the IP is changing daily. Just ignore the other guy's rhetoric. It's been stated over and over and has gotten no support (i.e. we're right, (s)he's wrong). Remember to [[Wikipedia:Do not feed the trolls]]. '''[[User:Sasquatch|Sasquatch]]'''  [[User_talk:Sasquatch|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Sasquatch|c]] 21:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
275700 +++$+++ Sasquatch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275699 +++$+++ 275699 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.147787220E09 +++$+++ Okay, I tried a range block, hopefully that will slow him down without causing too much havok. Cheers. ''' +++$+++ :Okay, I tried a range block, hopefully that will slow him down without causing too much havok. Cheers. '''[[User:Sasquatch|Sasquatch]]'''  [[User_talk:Sasquatch|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Sasquatch|c]] 06:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
275701 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275699 +++$+++ 275700 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 09:17:00 +++$+++ 1.147796220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking the time to look into this!   +++$+++ ::Thanks for taking the time to look into this!  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 09:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

537845 +++$+++ Hxseek +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-26 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.185477840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Hxseek|Hxseek]] 12:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
537846 +++$+++ Dbachmann +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537845 +++$+++ 537845 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.185479940E09 +++$+++ no it isn't. see [[Talk:Macedon]].  +++$+++ :no it isn't. see [[Talk:Macedon]]. [[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|(𒁳)]]</small> 12:59, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
537847 +++$+++ Ronz +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537845 +++$+++ 537845 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.185497760E09 +++$+++ Hxseek has been temporarily blocked, so there should be plenty of time now to discuss [[WP:RS]], [[WP:NPOV]], and related policies and guidelines that apply to this situation. -- +++$+++ :Hxseek has been temporarily blocked, so there should be plenty of time now to discuss [[WP:RS]], [[WP:NPOV]], and related policies and guidelines that apply to this situation. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] 17:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

13558 +++$+++ NMS Bill +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-21 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.271894040E09 +++$+++ Hi there Bonewah, I've just proposed a new \/ replacement section for the [[Koch Industries]] page, and would like to get someone else's eyes on it (currently on [[User:NMS_Bill\/Koch_Industries\/Corporate_history|a page in my user space]]) for discussion before it goes live. Please take a look if you get the chance, though I'll be reaching out to at least one more recent editor of the page. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi there Bonewah, I've just proposed a new / replacement section for the [[Koch Industries]] page, and would like to get someone else's eyes on it (currently on [[User:NMS_Bill/Koch_Industries/Corporate_history|a page in my user space]]) for discussion before it goes live. Please take a look if you get the chance, though I'll be reaching out to at least one more recent editor of the page. Cheers, [[User:NMS Bill|NMS Bill]] ([[User talk:NMS Bill|talk]]) 16:54, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
13559 +++$+++ NMS Bill +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13558 +++$+++ 13558 +++$+++ 2010-04-21 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.271894520E09 +++$+++ And I should have mentioned the first time, there is a detailed note about this on the [[Talk:Koch_Industries#Improving_the_history_section|Koch Industries Talk page]] which gets into some of the specific considerations.  +++$+++ :And I should have mentioned the first time, there is a detailed note about this on the [[Talk:Koch_Industries#Improving_the_history_section|Koch Industries Talk page]] which gets into some of the specific considerations. [[User:NMS Bill|NMS Bill]] ([[User talk:NMS Bill|talk]]) 17:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
13560 +++$+++ NMS Bill +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13558 +++$+++ 13559 +++$+++ 2010-04-25 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.272235020E09 +++$+++ Hi again, Bonewah. You seem to be occupied with other subjects right now, so I've taken this same request over to the Help Desk. Your input is still desired, if you wish to comment. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::Hi again, Bonewah. You seem to be occupied with other subjects right now, so I've taken this same request over to the Help Desk. Your input is still desired, if you wish to comment. Thanks, [[User:NMS Bill|NMS Bill]] ([[User talk:NMS Bill|talk]]) 15:37, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

275703 +++$+++ RN +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275703 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-16 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.147797060E09 +++$+++ You're still doing fantastic work on the Microsoft and other articles - thanks! Try not to spent too much time here though, it can be inefficient and suck the life out of you if you're not careful :). Thanks again! <small> +++$+++ You're still doing fantastic work on the Microsoft and other articles - thanks! Try not to spent too much time here though, it can be inefficient and suck the life out of you if you're not careful :). Thanks again! <small>[[User:RN|Just another star in the night]] <sup><font color="#6BA800">[[User talk:RN|T]]</font> | <font color="#0033FF">[[Special:Emailuser/RN|@]]</font> | <font color="#FF0000">[[Special:Contributions/RN|C]]</font></sup></small> 09:31, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
275704 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275703 +++$+++ 275703 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.147801380E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :) Coming from you, that's quite a compliment.  I'm taking some time off soon as I am moving at the end of the month (Wikipedia is relaxing compared to packing, I swear!), then I've got a vacation planned shortly afterwards.  I work with Windows and other Microsoft products in a professional capacity, so I contribute to these articles with the idea that, \"Hey, why not write what I learn into Wikipedia while I'm at it?\" ... that will keep me motivated and interested for a long time. Sometime in the summer I'd like to get a few articles up to GA status... my new place has a nice patio I can work on. ;)  +++$+++ :Thanks! :) Coming from you, that's quite a compliment.  I'm taking some time off soon as I am moving at the end of the month (Wikipedia is relaxing compared to packing, I swear!), then I've got a vacation planned shortly afterwards.  I work with Windows and other Microsoft products in a professional capacity, so I contribute to these articles with the idea that, "Hey, why not write what I learn into Wikipedia while I'm at it?" ... that will keep me motivated and interested for a long time. Sometime in the summer I'd like to get a few articles up to GA status... my new place has a nice patio I can work on. ;) [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 10:43, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
275705 +++$+++ RN +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275703 +++$+++ 275704 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 09:14:00 +++$+++ 1.147882440E09 +++$+++ A couple of things - 1) If you are interesting in some REAL SLOGGING CLEANUP there is a new article at [[History of Microsoft]], it may even be a copyvio but at any rate it needs serious cleanup and seems to be written from a very, very pro-Microsoft point of view :). 2) Those Vista screenshots you put up are amazing and tantalizing - what are your impressions? Yeah, offtopic I know :). <small> +++$+++ ::A couple of things - 1) If you are interesting in some REAL SLOGGING CLEANUP there is a new article at [[History of Microsoft]], it may even be a copyvio but at any rate it needs serious cleanup and seems to be written from a very, very pro-Microsoft point of view :). 2) Those Vista screenshots you put up are amazing and tantalizing - what are your impressions? Yeah, offtopic I know :). <small>[[User:RN|It is as it always was]] <sup><font color="#6BA800">[[User talk:RN|T]]</font> | <font color="#0033FF">[[Special:Emailuser/RN|@]]</font> | <font color="#FF0000">[[Special:Contributions/RN|C]]</font></sup></small> 09:14, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
275706 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275703 +++$+++ 275705 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.148169720E09 +++$+++ It does seem rather suspicious that the entire History of Microsoft article sprang fully-formed from a new editor, as it did, but short of finding the books given in the references (and I won't have time to do that until next month), copyvio checking is going to be a bit hard to do.  It may just make sense to merge some of the useful details from that article into the History section of the Microsoft article itself (and other articles), since the Microsoft article is (clearly ;) ) much more adherent to Wikipedia's standards.  For example, it mentions the Stac Electronics litigation and recall of MS-DOS 6, whereas the Microsoft article doesn't.  [http:\/\/query.nytimes.com\/gst\/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9407E3DB103AF932A25755C0A962958260 More info on that here]. There are some factual problems with article, too; it states that Windows Server 2003 was built on the .NET Framework, but that's obviously not the case.  The original release of Windows 95 didn't include IE 3.0.  And so on...   +++$+++ :::It does seem rather suspicious that the entire History of Microsoft article sprang fully-formed from a new editor, as it did, but short of finding the books given in the references (and I won't have time to do that until next month), copyvio checking is going to be a bit hard to do.  It may just make sense to merge some of the useful details from that article into the History section of the Microsoft article itself (and other articles), since the Microsoft article is (clearly ;) ) much more adherent to Wikipedia's standards.  For example, it mentions the Stac Electronics litigation and recall of MS-DOS 6, whereas the Microsoft article doesn't.  [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9407E3DB103AF932A25755C0A962958260 More info on that here]. There are some factual problems with article, too; it states that Windows Server 2003 was built on the .NET Framework, but that's obviously not the case.  The original release of Windows 95 didn't include IE 3.0.  And so on...  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 17:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

13561 +++$+++ Sperril +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-28 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.272483660E09 +++$+++ I've tried pretty hard to get [[User:Jimmuldrow|Jimmuldrow]] engaged on the talk page, but it seems to be going nowhere.  He continues to try to explain himself on [[User_talk:Sperril|my talk page]].  I've told him I won't discuss it with him there as it's a content dispute and such discussion should be had in the presence of the other editors.  I believe he is editing in good faith, but am now completely frustrated by his unwillingness to discuss his changes on the [[talk:Sarah Palin|article talk page.]]  I am not very familiar with dispute resolution, but am completely out of other ideas.  Since the Palin talk page is so well traveled, and so many other editors have voiced their opinions on this already, I feel RFC is inappropriate.  Unfortunately, the dispute seems to have devolved into an edit war between him and myself and I want to break the cycle.  What do you think would be the logical next step? (Assuming he doesn't listen to my latest plea to take it to the article talk page anyway?) +++$+++ I've tried pretty hard to get [[User:Jimmuldrow|Jimmuldrow]] engaged on the talk page, but it seems to be going nowhere.  He continues to try to explain himself on [[User_talk:Sperril|my talk page]].  I've told him I won't discuss it with him there as it's a content dispute and such discussion should be had in the presence of the other editors.  I believe he is editing in good faith, but am now completely frustrated by his unwillingness to discuss his changes on the [[talk:Sarah Palin|article talk page.]]  I am not very familiar with dispute resolution, but am completely out of other ideas.  Since the Palin talk page is so well traveled, and so many other editors have voiced their opinions on this already, I feel RFC is inappropriate.  Unfortunately, the dispute seems to have devolved into an edit war between him and myself and I want to break the cycle.  What do you think would be the logical next step? (Assuming he doesn't listen to my latest plea to take it to the article talk page anyway?)[[User:Sperril|Sperril]] ([[User talk:Sperril|talk]]) 12:41, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
13562 +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ Bonewah +++$+++ 13561 +++$+++ 13561 +++$+++ 2010-04-28 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.272501000E09 +++$+++ I think you are right that an RFC is inappropriate, as you said, there is no shortage of people who have an opinion as to what that section should look like.  Having said that, maybe [[wp:ANI|the admin incidents notice board]] or |[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/User conduct]] is the next step.  Sadly, this behavior is just the tip of the iceberg with him, he regularly ignores consensus, mischaracterizes arguments, bombards the talk page with the same thing over and over, and generally is the poster boy for [[wp:Tendentious editing|Tendentious editing]]. However, he is good at appearing to be working with other editors just enough that a formal complaint wont quite stick. Heck, just scan some of the recent sarah palin archives and you will see what I mean, section after section is him repeating the same thing and ignoring the 5-6 editors who disagree with him.  For something like this, however, You might try asking [[User:KillerChihuahua]] to talk to Jimmuldrow, KC regularly acts as an uninvolved admin to enforce the [[Talk:Sarah Palin\/Article probation|article probation]] on that page.   +++$+++ :I think you are right that an RFC is inappropriate, as you said, there is no shortage of people who have an opinion as to what that section should look like.  Having said that, maybe [[wp:ANI|the admin incidents notice board]] or |[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct]] is the next step.  Sadly, this behavior is just the tip of the iceberg with him, he regularly ignores consensus, mischaracterizes arguments, bombards the talk page with the same thing over and over, and generally is the poster boy for [[wp:Tendentious editing|Tendentious editing]]. However, he is good at appearing to be working with other editors just enough that a formal complaint wont quite stick. Heck, just scan some of the recent sarah palin archives and you will see what I mean, section after section is him repeating the same thing and ignoring the 5-6 editors who disagree with him.  For something like this, however, You might try asking [[User:KillerChihuahua]] to talk to Jimmuldrow, KC regularly acts as an uninvolved admin to enforce the [[Talk:Sarah Palin/Article probation|article probation]] on that page.  [[User:Bonewah|Bonewah]] ([[User talk:Bonewah#top|talk]]) 17:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

275707 +++$+++ AlistairMcMillan +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-22 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.148348940E09 +++$+++ Just curious what are you basing this edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mac_OS_X&diff=54553215&oldid=54549289] on, as far as the kernel goes.  +++$+++ Just curious what are you basing this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mac_OS_X&diff=54553215&oldid=54549289] on, as far as the kernel goes. [[User:AlistairMcMillan|AlistairMcMillan]] 18:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
275708 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275707 +++$+++ 275707 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.148351100E09 +++$+++ [[OPENSTEP]] isn't a kernel.  Seems clear enough, yes?  +++$+++ :[[OPENSTEP]] isn't a kernel.  Seems clear enough, yes? [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 19:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
275709 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275707 +++$+++ 275707 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.148351280E09 +++$+++ ... though I think I may have worded the edit summary wrong.  I wrote \"not based on OPENSTEP's kernel\" when I meant \"not based on the OPENSTEP kernel\".   +++$+++ :... though I think I may have worded the edit summary wrong.  I wrote "not based on OPENSTEP's kernel" when I meant "not based on the OPENSTEP kernel".  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 19:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
275710 +++$+++ AlistairMcMillan +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275707 +++$+++ 275709 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.148351880E09 +++$+++ I can see where you are going with your edit though, but to my mind your version reads as if there isn't that much in common, whereas, below a certain level, they are a hell of a lot alike.  +++$+++ :: I can see where you are going with your edit though, but to my mind your version reads as if there isn't that much in common, whereas, below a certain level, they are a hell of a lot alike. [[User:AlistairMcMillan|AlistairMcMillan]] 19:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
275711 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275707 +++$+++ 275710 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.148353920E09 +++$+++ I've been using Macs for years and even I found the phrasing to be confusing enough that I had to go read the OPENSTEP article to see if I was missing something.  It doesn't help that the history is a bit convoluted, so anything we can do to make it crisp and clear to people reading about the subject for the first time would be good.  I'm still not really happy with that section; the meandering into NEXTSTEP's porting efforts seems more like a topic for the \"history\" of OS X rather than a \"description\" of it.   +++$+++ ::: I've been using Macs for years and even I found the phrasing to be confusing enough that I had to go read the OPENSTEP article to see if I was missing something.  It doesn't help that the history is a bit convoluted, so anything we can do to make it crisp and clear to people reading about the subject for the first time would be good.  I'm still not really happy with that section; the meandering into NEXTSTEP's porting efforts seems more like a topic for the "history" of OS X rather than a "description" of it.  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 20:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
275712 +++$+++ AlistairMcMillan +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275707 +++$+++ 275711 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.148354520E09 +++$+++ BTW You wouldn't happen to know what the OPENSTEP kernel was actually called, would you?  I've been trying to find out.  I have a feeling they might have been a bit lacking in the imagination department at NeXT.  It seems to have been called... drumroll... \"kernel\".[http:\/\/www.shawcomputing.net\/resources\/apple\/op_sys\/rhap51\/uptime-rhap51.html]  +++$+++ :::: BTW You wouldn't happen to know what the OPENSTEP kernel was actually called, would you?  I've been trying to find out.  I have a feeling they might have been a bit lacking in the imagination department at NeXT.  It seems to have been called... drumroll... "kernel".[http://www.shawcomputing.net/resources/apple/op_sys/rhap51/uptime-rhap51.html] [[User:AlistairMcMillan|AlistairMcMillan]] 20:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
275713 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275707 +++$+++ 275712 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.148355780E09 +++$+++ Everything I know about NeXT's products, I learned from Wikipedia. Sorry. :)  +++$+++ ::::: Everything I know about NeXT's products, I learned from Wikipedia. Sorry. :) [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 20:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

89642 +++$+++ Infrogmation +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.157062080E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'm not sure why you wish to insist that there's only been one design of Wonka related satire on the [[Ray Nagin]] article. I put in a link to a Times-Picayune article mentioning two others, and reference to several more (including a couple of pix I took around town with such shirts visibile) on the article talk page. Should you wish to find more, a few minutes of google search for variations on combinations of \"Nagin\" \"Ray\" \"Chocolate\" \"Willy\" \"Wonka\" \"Mayor\" should turn such up. Cheers, --  +++$+++ Hi. I'm not sure why you wish to insist that there's only been one design of Wonka related satire on the [[Ray Nagin]] article. I put in a link to a Times-Picayune article mentioning two others, and reference to several more (including a couple of pix I took around town with such shirts visibile) on the article talk page. Should you wish to find more, a few minutes of google search for variations on combinations of "Nagin" "Ray" "Chocolate" "Willy" "Wonka" "Mayor" should turn such up. Cheers, -- [[User:Infrogmation|Infrogmation]] 15:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
89643 +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89642 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.157065980E09 +++$+++ Hello.  There seems to be some confusion on your part as to what issue I was addressing.  Any\/all claims should be verifiable by a reliable source, and that source should be clearly cited\/referenced in the article.  This is basic wikipedia policy.  The citation that was originally included only mentioned ONE online store that sold the referenced T-Shirts.  I never wrote anything about T-Shirt ''designs''; your claim was that several sources were selling shirts, while the cited article only mentioned ''one'' store.   Now that you've added the link to the Times-Picayune article that clearly indicates other vendors, my concerns have been addressed.  This link was not included in the article previously.  Thanks. +++$+++ ::Hello.  There seems to be some confusion on your part as to what issue I was addressing.  Any/all claims should be verifiable by a reliable source, and that source should be clearly cited/referenced in the article.  This is basic wikipedia policy.  The citation that was originally included only mentioned ONE online store that sold the referenced T-Shirts.  I never wrote anything about T-Shirt ''designs''; your claim was that several sources were selling shirts, while the cited article only mentioned ''one'' store.   Now that you've added the link to the Times-Picayune article that clearly indicates other vendors, my concerns have been addressed.  This link was not included in the article previously.  Thanks.[[User:Hal Raglan|Hal Raglan]] 16:13, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
89644 +++$+++ Infrogmation +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89642 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.157067120E09 +++$+++ I see we were editing somewhat at cross purposes. I was trying to correct what I knew to be an inaccurate description of the situation in the article text, whereas you were editing to put the article in accordance with what was in that single link. I'm glad we seem to have resolved this detail. Thanks for your work. Cheers, --  +++$+++ ::: I see we were editing somewhat at cross purposes. I was trying to correct what I knew to be an inaccurate description of the situation in the article text, whereas you were editing to put the article in accordance with what was in that single link. I'm glad we seem to have resolved this detail. Thanks for your work. Cheers, -- [[User:Infrogmation|Infrogmation]] 16:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

537854 +++$+++ Buckshot06 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537854 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-07 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.186530600E09 +++$+++ Following your comments, I've improved the article a bit more. Do you think it's ready for A-class review?  +++$+++ Following your comments, I've improved the article a bit more. Do you think it's ready for A-class review? [[User:Buckshot06|Buckshot06]] 16:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
537855 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537854 +++$+++ 537854 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.186553880E09 +++$+++ I believe that it would be a good idea, because not only this article is great, especially considering the few sources available, but if there are a few flaws that may have escaped during the peer-review they could be caught now. Again, my congratulations for your work. Ciao,-- +++$+++ :I believe that it would be a good idea, because not only this article is great, especially considering the few sources available, but if there are a few flaws that may have escaped during the peer-review they could be caught now. Again, my congratulations for your work. Ciao,--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 23:18, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
537856 +++$+++ El C +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537854 +++$+++ 537854 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.186554180E09 +++$+++ I echo that. I intend to read it closely soon.  +++$+++ :I echo that. I intend to read it closely soon. [[User:El C|El_C]] 23:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

506736 +++$+++ Ecragg +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-19 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.303244280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ecragg|Ecragg]] ([[User talk:Ecragg|talk]]) 13:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
506737 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ 506736 +++$+++ 506736 +++$+++ 2011-04-19 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.303245600E09 +++$+++ I hope this helps but please let me know if you have any more questions. -- +++$+++ :I hope this helps but please let me know if you have any more questions. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko#top|talk]]) 13:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

275714 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-25 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.148544240E09 +++$+++ Nice to see your name showing up in my watchlist again. :)   +++$+++ Nice to see your name showing up in my watchlist again. :)  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 01:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
275715 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275714 +++$+++ 275714 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.148559600E09 +++$+++ Just trying to get back on track after being idle for a while. :-) \u2014  +++$+++ :Just trying to get back on track after being idle for a while. :-) — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 05:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

537860 +++$+++ Jackanapes +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-16 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.187321640E09 +++$+++ Check [http:\/\/forum.boinaslava.net\/attachment.php?attachmentid=4081 this] map of the Bulgarian occupation zone. It seems that such information exists only in Yugoslav sources. -  +++$+++ Check [http://forum.boinaslava.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=4081 this] map of the Bulgarian occupation zone. It seems that such information exists only in Yugoslav sources. - [[User:Jackanapes|Jackanapes]] 20:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
537861 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537860 +++$+++ 537860 +++$+++ 2007-08-16 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.187323800E09 +++$+++ To awnser your concerns, I've found a non-Yugoslav source, Tomasevich's ''The Chetniks''. As for the border, remember that German, Italy and Bulgaria were allies, and as such were ready to provide reciprocal help to crush common enemies.-- +++$+++ :To awnser your concerns, I've found a non-Yugoslav source, Tomasevich's ''The Chetniks''. As for the border, remember that German, Italy and Bulgaria were allies, and as such were ready to provide reciprocal help to crush common enemies.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

275717 +++$+++ Xaosflux +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275717 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-27 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.148763120E09 +++$+++ I've put this article on my [[User:Xaosflux\/Desk|desk]] and will keep an eye on it for a few days, and will reapply protection if the issue is still going on. \u2014  +++$+++ I've put this article on my [[User:Xaosflux/Desk|desk]] and will keep an eye on it for a few days, and will reapply protection if the issue is still going on. — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 13:52, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
275718 +++$+++ Xaosflux +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275717 +++$+++ 275717 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.149328980E09 +++$+++ I'm not going to actively watch this anymore, there have been no edits at all since your last revert, that alone also speaks to the lack of need for sprotection at this time as well, IMHO.  If it starts getting bad though, please leave me a talk message.  Thanks, \u2014  +++$+++ :I'm not going to actively watch this anymore, there have been no edits at all since your last revert, that alone also speaks to the lack of need for sprotection at this time as well, IMHO.  If it starts getting bad though, please leave me a talk message.  Thanks, — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 03:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
275719 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275717 +++$+++ 275717 +++$+++ 2006-05-28 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.148845080E09 +++$+++ Well that definitely is quite promising. One thing I felt though that just listing in not going to be enough. We need to specify which version of windows they can be found in. May be a table to do that. What do you think? --[[User:Soumyasch|<font color=\"green\">so<\/font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color=\"red\">U<\/font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color=\"green\">m<\/font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color=\"red\">'''y'''<\/font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color=\"green\">a<\/font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color=\"red\">S<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Well that definitely is quite promising. One thing I felt though that just listing in not going to be enough. We need to specify which version of windows they can be found in. May be a table to do that. What do you think? --[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">so</font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="red">U</font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">m</font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="red">'''y'''</font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="red">S</font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">ch</font>]] 12:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

537862 +++$+++ Laertes d +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537862 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-17 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.187373660E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Laertes d|laertes d]] 11:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
537863 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537862 +++$+++ 537862 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.187393880E09 +++$+++ The editor who vandalized your page isn't Alexius: I immediately noted in that so magnifically trollish and sub-intelligent editing a user long banned to all's satisfaction, [[User:GreekWarrior]]. To what I did with him, ignore him, unless he continues vandalizing your page, as I'll temporarily sp your user page then. Regarding the other issues, Alexius isn't blocked so even if it's him, I don't see what should be done. If you feel it's an important thing with a pattern of disruption I'd advice you to ask [[User:Akhilleus]], who's best regarding socks. Also, I must admit I'm a bit exhausted with Balkan-Turkish disputes, and I tend to avoid them lately.-- +++$+++ :The editor who vandalized your page isn't Alexius: I immediately noted in that so magnifically trollish and sub-intelligent editing a user long banned to all's satisfaction, [[User:GreekWarrior]]. To what I did with him, ignore him, unless he continues vandalizing your page, as I'll temporarily sp your user page then. Regarding the other issues, Alexius isn't blocked so even if it's him, I don't see what should be done. If you feel it's an important thing with a pattern of disruption I'd advice you to ask [[User:Akhilleus]], who's best regarding socks. Also, I must admit I'm a bit exhausted with Balkan-Turkish disputes, and I tend to avoid them lately.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

13575 +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ 13575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-03 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.283549460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for removing the block.  I would like to get your advice on how I should have handled the situation differently.  As you can imagine it was a fairly frustrating interaction and I was not getting a lot of help when I reached out on the noticeboards.  Then to get blocked after I flagged the issue on the incidents noticeboard was obviously not what I had expected. <font color=\"#3950A5\" size=\"1\">|\u25ba<\/font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color=\"#000070\"><b>\u03cbr\u0431an<\/b><\/font><font color=\"#4D4D4D\">\u044fene\u03c9a\u2113<\/font>]] \u2022  +++$+++ Thanks for removing the block.  I would like to get your advice on how I should have handled the situation differently.  As you can imagine it was a fairly frustrating interaction and I was not getting a lot of help when I reached out on the noticeboards.  Then to get blocked after I flagged the issue on the incidents noticeboard was obviously not what I had expected. <font color="#3950A5" size="1">|►</font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color="#000070"><b>ϋrбan</b></font><font color="#4D4D4D">яeneωaℓ</font>]] • [[User:Urbanrenewal/talk|<font size="0" color="#BFA137">TALK</font>]] <font color="#3950A5" size="1">◄|</font> 14:31, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
13576 +++$+++  Toddst1 +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ 13575 +++$+++ 13575 +++$+++ 2010-09-03 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.283551200E09 +++$+++ Let me know if I can be of assistance. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Let me know if I can be of assistance. Cheers. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 15:00, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
13577 +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ 13575 +++$+++ 13576 +++$+++ 2010-09-03 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.283552340E09 +++$+++ Thanks, it's a first for me.  I guess my other question is tomorrow if the other editor goes back and removes the image what is the right way to proceed at that point?  <font color=\"#3950A5\" size=\"1\">|\u25ba<\/font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color=\"#000070\"><b>\u03cbr\u0431an<\/b><\/font><font color=\"#4D4D4D\">\u044fene\u03c9a\u2113<\/font>]] \u2022  +++$+++ ::Thanks, it's a first for me.  I guess my other question is tomorrow if the other editor goes back and removes the image what is the right way to proceed at that point?  <font color="#3950A5" size="1">|►</font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color="#000070"><b>ϋrбan</b></font><font color="#4D4D4D">яeneωaℓ</font>]] • [[User:Urbanrenewal/talk|<font size="0" color="#BFA137">TALK</font>]] <font color="#3950A5" size="1">◄|</font> 15:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
13578 +++$+++  Toddst1 +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ 13575 +++$+++ 13577 +++$+++ 2010-09-03 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.283560260E09 +++$+++ Bring it to the attention of one of the admins that commented on your block, me or go back to ANI stating that the edit war has continued. If you bring it to ANI, I would remove the {{tlx|resolved}} tag from the existing thread and  move the thread down to the bottom adding your comment. Do not revert the edit to the article.  I'm moving this entire thread here from my talk page as it would probably be more useful to anyone else looking at the problem if the EW continues.   Cheers.  +++$+++ :::Bring it to the attention of one of the admins that commented on your block, me or go back to ANI stating that the edit war has continued. If you bring it to ANI, I would remove the {{tlx|resolved}} tag from the existing thread and  move the thread down to the bottom adding your comment. Do not revert the edit to the article.  I'm moving this entire thread here from my talk page as it would probably be more useful to anyone else looking at the problem if the EW continues.   Cheers. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 17:31, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
13579 +++$+++ BlackberryHacks +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ 13575 +++$+++ 13578 +++$+++ 2010-09-04 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.283603700E09 +++$+++ I'm the other editor who was blocked. I was blocked for repeatedly removing this photo, which has not been established is in the public domain. My question: Should the photo remain on the page? The other editor describes me as a new editor. (July 2008. Does that make me new? Or necessarily in the wrong?) He says I was uncivil, but the thread of edits on these pages shows nothing uncivil. Persistent, yes. But my edits were made in good faith, and I accepted my block gracefully and without protest. But I'm not clear on this: What to do now about that photo? Why do we allow it to remain if, as editor PhilKnight says, \"I haven't been able to establish when it was published.\" You may see why a (newer) editor would be confused why all this is being discussed in the context of \"disruptive image removal\" instead of \"disruptive image posting\"? I removed the photo because its copyright status is not clear; the experienced editor reposted it, saying it was probably OK. I removed it and asked for evidence; he removed it and said it was clearly OK. Yes, we both were guilty of edit warring. But what I don't understand is, while the photo's legal status is in dispute, why is it allowed to remain? Should we not err on the side of following the copyright law? The user Urbanrenewal does not have any evidence of a publication date for this photo -- he is guessing that it \"must have been\" published at a certain time, because it was taken then. When it was taken is not the test, right? Now, down to brass tacks: Is the proper course for me to take to mark this photo for deletion from Wikipedia? If so, how? I see the note above referring to WP:CSD#G12, but at that page I don't understand what exactly one should do. I'm afraid to remove the photo, because that would be edit warring. (Meanwhile, the editor who disagrees is free to re-post the photo?) Thank you for your suggestions. +++$+++ ::::I'm the other editor who was blocked. I was blocked for repeatedly removing this photo, which has not been established is in the public domain. My question: Should the photo remain on the page? The other editor describes me as a new editor. (July 2008. Does that make me new? Or necessarily in the wrong?) He says I was uncivil, but the thread of edits on these pages shows nothing uncivil. Persistent, yes. But my edits were made in good faith, and I accepted my block gracefully and without protest. But I'm not clear on this: What to do now about that photo? Why do we allow it to remain if, as editor PhilKnight says, "I haven't been able to establish when it was published." You may see why a (newer) editor would be confused why all this is being discussed in the context of "disruptive image removal" instead of "disruptive image posting"? I removed the photo because its copyright status is not clear; the experienced editor reposted it, saying it was probably OK. I removed it and asked for evidence; he removed it and said it was clearly OK. Yes, we both were guilty of edit warring. But what I don't understand is, while the photo's legal status is in dispute, why is it allowed to remain? Should we not err on the side of following the copyright law? The user Urbanrenewal does not have any evidence of a publication date for this photo -- he is guessing that it "must have been" published at a certain time, because it was taken then. When it was taken is not the test, right? Now, down to brass tacks: Is the proper course for me to take to mark this photo for deletion from Wikipedia? If so, how? I see the note above referring to WP:CSD#G12, but at that page I don't understand what exactly one should do. I'm afraid to remove the photo, because that would be edit warring. (Meanwhile, the editor who disagrees is free to re-post the photo?) Thank you for your suggestions.[[User:BlackberryHacks|BlackberryHacks]] ([[User talk:BlackberryHacks|talk]]) 05:35, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

275720 +++$+++ Hexagon1 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-29 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.148911800E09 +++$+++ I may have acted prematurely though, my appologies for that, but I stand by the moves, I believe they are in line with Wikipedia's naming policy.  + +++$+++ I may have acted prematurely though, my appologies for that, but I stand by the moves, I believe they are in line with Wikipedia's naming policy.  +[[User:Hexagon1|Hexagon1]] <sup>([[User talk:Hexagon1|t]])</sup> 07:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
275721 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275720 +++$+++ 275720 +++$+++ 2006-05-29 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.148915100E09 +++$+++ Hope that explains where I'm coming from on this subject.   +++$+++ : Hope that explains where I'm coming from on this subject.  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 08:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

275722 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-30 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.149001920E09 +++$+++ Have a nice break!!! [[Image:Smile.png]] --[[User:Soumyasch|<font color=\"green\">so<\/font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color=\"red\">U<\/font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color=\"green\">m<\/font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color=\"red\">'''y'''<\/font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color=\"green\">a<\/font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color=\"red\">S<\/font>]] +++$+++ Have a nice break!!! [[Image:Smile.png]] --[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">so</font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="red">U</font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">m</font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="red">'''y'''</font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="red">S</font>]][[User:Soumyasch|<font color="green">ch</font>]] 08:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
275723 +++$+++ RN +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275722 +++$+++ 275722 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.149002400E09 +++$+++ Ditto - hope its sunny\/rainy\/yourpreference there!!!  +++$+++ :Ditto - hope its sunny/rainy/yourpreference there!!! [[User:RN|RN]] 08:20, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

526551 +++$+++ Parker007 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526551 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-25 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.172399700E09 +++$+++ Would it be possible for you to update DYK. I have put <nowiki>{{*mp}}<\/nowiki> on some entries in Feb 20 & Feb 21. -- +++$+++ Would it be possible for you to update DYK. I have put <nowiki>{{*mp}}</nowiki> on some entries in Feb 20 & Feb 21. --[[User:Parker007|Parker007]] 02:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
526552 +++$+++ Parker007 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526551 +++$+++ 526551 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.172408580E09 +++$+++ Okay added 2 more. Now update the DYK. Sheesh! -- +++$+++ :Okay added 2 more. Now update the DYK. Sheesh! --[[User:Parker007|Parker007]] 05:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
526553 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526551 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.172412540E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure what the \"Sheesh!\" is for.  Politeness goes a long way. (DYK is updated.) &mdash;  +++$+++ ::: I'm not sure what the "Sheesh!" is for.  Politeness goes a long way. (DYK is updated.) &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 06:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

275724 +++$+++ Yanksox +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-05 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.149509340E09 +++$+++ I don't want to sound very annoying or like a wikipreacher, but even anon editors deserve some civility[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=REALbasic&diff=56950784&oldid=56950714]. Of course, I don't know the circumstances of the situation, and I'm sorry for any trouble this post may of caused.  +++$+++ I don't want to sound very annoying or like a wikipreacher, but even anon editors deserve some civility[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=REALbasic&diff=56950784&oldid=56950714]. Of course, I don't know the circumstances of the situation, and I'm sorry for any trouble this post may of caused. [[User:Yanksox|Yanksox]] 05:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
275725 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275724 +++$+++ 275724 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.149509580E09 +++$+++ This person has been vandalising [[REALbasic]] for five months, has threatened Wikipedia and individual editors with lawsuits, has caused the page to be sprotected multiple times due to persistent vandalism, has refused to work with other editors, has been blocked for multiple 3RR violations, and has had several sockpuppets banned.  Civility?  Shyeah.  +++$+++ :This person has been vandalising [[REALbasic]] for five months, has threatened Wikipedia and individual editors with lawsuits, has caused the page to be sprotected multiple times due to persistent vandalism, has refused to work with other editors, has been blocked for multiple 3RR violations, and has had several sockpuppets banned.  Civility?  Shyeah. [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 05:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

275726 +++$+++ Yanksox +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275726 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-05 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.149509820E09 +++$+++ All I am saying is that comments like that just fuel an uncontrolable fire. And fire is...well...not...good. Have you considered reporting to the incident board?  +++$+++ All I am saying is that comments like that just fuel an uncontrolable fire. And fire is...well...not...good. Have you considered reporting to the incident board? [[User:Yanksox|Yanksox]] 05:17, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
275727 +++$+++ Yanksox +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275726 +++$+++ 275726 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.149510300E09 +++$+++ And for the record, I reported [[User:67.0.72.247|67.0.72.247 ]] to [[WP:AIV]].  +++$+++ :And for the record, I reported [[User:67.0.72.247|67.0.72.247 ]] to [[WP:AIV]]. [[User:Yanksox|Yanksox]] 05:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
275728 +++$+++ Yanksox +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275726 +++$+++ 275727 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.149510480E09 +++$+++ And this happened[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&user=&page=User:67.0.72.247].  +++$+++ ::And this happened[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&user=&page=User:67.0.72.247]. [[User:Yanksox|Yanksox]] 05:28, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
275729 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275726 +++$+++ 275728 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 05:34:00 +++$+++ 1.149510840E09 +++$+++ It's a dial-up modem pool; the user will be back on another IP before that block expires.  +++$+++ :::It's a dial-up modem pool; the user will be back on another IP before that block expires. [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 05:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

537872 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537872 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-18 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.187492580E09 +++$+++ And as for further evidence, he has '''completely''' identical interests (of the countless articles) that Afrika paprika edited like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Vladimir_Prelog&action=history Vladimir Prelog] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bunjevci&limit=500&action=history Bunjevci]. -- +++$+++ And as for further evidence, he has '''completely''' identical interests (of the countless articles) that Afrika paprika edited like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vladimir_Prelog&action=history Vladimir Prelog] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bunjevci&limit=500&action=history Bunjevci]. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 20:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
537873 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537872 +++$+++ 537872 +++$+++ 2007-08-18 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.187494980E09 +++$+++ I've controlled his edits, and even discounting what Mackensen said regarding the checkuser, the evidence is crushing: they have exactly the same editing pattern, to a point that can't be a coincidence. Thus I've blocked the account.-- +++$+++ :I've controlled his edits, and even discounting what Mackensen said regarding the checkuser, the evidence is crushing: they have exactly the same editing pattern, to a point that can't be a coincidence. Thus I've blocked the account.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 20:43, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
537874 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537872 +++$+++ 537873 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.187561220E09 +++$+++ I'd also like to point out that that which Afrika paprika was saying all this time about all users from Croatia having the same IP address is wrong. ;) This further narrows down. -- +++$+++ ::I'd also like to point out that that which Afrika paprika was saying all this time about all users from Croatia having the same IP address is wrong. ;) This further narrows down. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 15:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

275730 +++$+++ RichardHarrold +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-05 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.149544200E09 +++$+++ Hey Warren (and [[User:Jgm|JGM]]) - I've just had a thought about what has been said about the length of the [[Led Zeppelin|Led Zeppelin article]] - would it be possible to make the page appear shorter by putting large sections - such as the band's history - into drop-down boxes (as used for Wikipedia \"Contents\" lists)? I think that if it would be possible to do that (and have them set to \"hide\" as default and let the viewer \"open them up\"), that would be a good idea.-- +++$+++ Hey Warren (and [[User:Jgm|JGM]]) - I've just had a thought about what has been said about the length of the [[Led Zeppelin|Led Zeppelin article]] - would it be possible to make the page appear shorter by putting large sections - such as the band's history - into drop-down boxes (as used for Wikipedia "Contents" lists)? I think that if it would be possible to do that (and have them set to "hide" as default and let the viewer "open them up"), that would be a good idea.--[[User:RichardHarrold|RichardHarrold]] 14:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
275731 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275730 +++$+++ 275730 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.149545400E09 +++$+++ Hi RichardHarrold, thanks for the message.  Wikipedia's guidelines regarding article length generally encourage us to separate out large sections into their own articles, while leaving a concise description of the most important details and events in a few paragraphs in the main article.  I like your idea, and I'm always in favour of new and interesting ways to improve the readability and usability of the encyclopedia, but we should probably stick with the tried-and-true methods as a first resort, and if there are still serious problems, experiment with novel ideas after that.  I always like to look to Featured Articles as inspiration on how to write and lay out a great article.  +++$+++ :Hi RichardHarrold, thanks for the message.  Wikipedia's guidelines regarding article length generally encourage us to separate out large sections into their own articles, while leaving a concise description of the most important details and events in a few paragraphs in the main article.  I like your idea, and I'm always in favour of new and interesting ways to improve the readability and usability of the encyclopedia, but we should probably stick with the tried-and-true methods as a first resort, and if there are still serious problems, experiment with novel ideas after that.  I always like to look to Featured Articles as inspiration on how to write and lay out a great article. [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 15:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

275732 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275732 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-06 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.149656220E09 +++$+++ Hey, do you think [[Smart folder]] be merged into the [[Virtual folder]] in a '''Mac OS X''' section. --'' +++$+++ Hey, do you think [[Smart folder]] be merged into the [[Virtual folder]] in a '''Mac OS X''' section. --''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">soum</font>]]''<sup>সৌমো</sup>''[[User Talk:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">yasch</font>]]'' 21:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
275733 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275732 +++$+++ 275732 +++$+++ 2006-06-06 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.149657060E09 +++$+++ I'm actually wondering if it makes sense to merge the Smart folder text into the Spotlight article, as it is part of the Spotlight technology.  Reference to Spotlight's Smart Folders would certainly have a place in a good article on virtual folders, too.  I haven't reviewed the text of these too closely (I'm still dealing with moving-related issues plus catching up with work, and preparing for a vacation :) )... so this is just my gut-feeling on it, rather than from an analysis of the text we've got.   +++$+++ :I'm actually wondering if it makes sense to merge the Smart folder text into the Spotlight article, as it is part of the Spotlight technology.  Reference to Spotlight's Smart Folders would certainly have a place in a good article on virtual folders, too.  I haven't reviewed the text of these too closely (I'm still dealing with moving-related issues plus catching up with work, and preparing for a vacation :) )... so this is just my gut-feeling on it, rather than from an analysis of the text we've got.  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 22:11, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
275734 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275732 +++$+++ 275733 +++$+++ 2006-06-06 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.149657600E09 +++$+++ Meanwhile, I will be creating the section and fill it with material ''borrowed'' from Spotlight and Smart Folder articles, over the next few days and put it up for discussion. You enjoy your ''upcoming'' vacation :). Btw, have you seen the almost redone [[Microsoft Office 2007]] article? I am confused whether to move it to '''2007 Microsoft Office system''' though!!! (What pain would it have caused MS to capitalize 's' in system? Or put 2007 at end? <sigh>) --'' +++$+++ ::Meanwhile, I will be creating the section and fill it with material ''borrowed'' from Spotlight and Smart Folder articles, over the next few days and put it up for discussion. You enjoy your ''upcoming'' vacation :). Btw, have you seen the almost redone [[Microsoft Office 2007]] article? I am confused whether to move it to '''2007 Microsoft Office system''' though!!! (What pain would it have caused MS to capitalize 's' in system? Or put 2007 at end? <sigh>) --''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">soum</font>]]''<sup>সৌমো</sup>''[[User Talk:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">yasch</font>]]'' 22:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

89646 +++$+++ Fuhghettaboutit +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89646 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-23 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.158995700E09 +++$+++ The article is looking great. A few minor notes. I noticed in quite a few uses of the word ''relatively'', as in \"relatively smooth\", \"relatively small budget.\" Consider removing or replacing with content. As to comprehensiveness, I was comparing it to a few other film FAs--is there material for sections on writing, direction, music and casting? I am ''not'' saying you need all of these, just that these sections have been addressed in other FA movie articles, and past examples can be the best teachers. Oh, I added one fact template--that section contains a very specific list of movies that were influenced by this movie; screams for a citation.-- +++$+++ The article is looking great. A few minor notes. I noticed in quite a few uses of the word ''relatively'', as in "relatively smooth", "relatively small budget." Consider removing or replacing with content. As to comprehensiveness, I was comparing it to a few other film FAs--is there material for sections on writing, direction, music and casting? I am ''not'' saying you need all of these, just that these sections have been addressed in other FA movie articles, and past examples can be the best teachers. Oh, I added one fact template--that section contains a very specific list of movies that were influenced by this movie; screams for a citation.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] 00:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
89647 +++$+++ Fuhghettaboutit +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89646 +++$+++ 89646 +++$+++ 2006-10-01 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.159753080E09 +++$+++ Congrats on the FA!-- +++$+++ :Congrats on the FA!--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] 18:38, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
89648 +++$+++ Fuhghettaboutit +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89646 +++$+++ 89647 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.160998980E09 +++$+++ Hey Hal. How's everyhting? Noticed your edit on my watchlist, thought commenting it out might help. Feel free to revert.-- +++$+++ ::Hey Hal. How's everyhting? Noticed your edit on my watchlist, thought commenting it out might help. Feel free to revert.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] 04:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

275735 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-08 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.149804240E09 +++$+++ Hey Akhristov, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. :-)  It's becoming a bit of a problem lately...  +++$+++ Hey Akhristov, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. :-)  It's becoming a bit of a problem lately... [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 15:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
275736 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275735 +++$+++ 275735 +++$+++ 2006-06-08 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.149812460E09 +++$+++ No problem!  :-)  \u2014  +++$+++ :No problem!  :-)  — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 17:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

275737 +++$+++ Tsetna +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-11 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.150084080E09 +++$+++ Hello Warrens, I recognize you from Ars Technica! I wanted to make you aware of this section of the Talk article: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Ars_Technica#Alleged_Subscription_problems]. It is one of several areas where myself and a couple other users have explained our removal of materials. You will probably notice that there is an edit war going on. If you can look over my Talk contributions, you will see that I have explained my actions more than once. I might not be convincing, but I would appreciate any comments you have.  +++$+++ Hello Warrens, I recognize you from Ars Technica! I wanted to make you aware of this section of the Talk article: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ars_Technica#Alleged_Subscription_problems]. It is one of several areas where myself and a couple other users have explained our removal of materials. You will probably notice that there is an edit war going on. If you can look over my Talk contributions, you will see that I have explained my actions more than once. I might not be convincing, but I would appreciate any comments you have. [[User:Tsetna|Tsetna]] 20:48, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
275738 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275737 +++$+++ 275737 +++$+++ 2006-06-11 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.150084440E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for the message.  Upon reviewing this I just realised I made a silly mistake -- I was looking at the edit prior to yours as the one that needed to be corrected; what you had there was just fine and definitely more in line with what should be in the article.  Apologies any confusion I may have caused. :-)  I don't want to get too involved in that particular edit dispute, unless it comes down to a straw poll or something...   +++$+++ :Hey, thanks for the message.  Upon reviewing this I just realised I made a silly mistake -- I was looking at the edit prior to yours as the one that needed to be corrected; what you had there was just fine and definitely more in line with what should be in the article.  Apologies any confusion I may have caused. :-)  I don't want to get too involved in that particular edit dispute, unless it comes down to a straw poll or something...  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 20:54, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

537882 +++$+++ 203.59.118.146 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537882 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-22 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.187817360E09 +++$+++ Will my beneficial edits to any article be reverted? Regards.  +++$+++ Will my beneficial edits to any article be reverted? Regards. [[User:203.59.118.146|203.59.118.146]] 14:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
537883 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537882 +++$+++ 537882 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.187824380E09 +++$+++ Lets put it this way: if your edits fully respect wikipedia policies, are carefully backed with ''reliable'' sources (please, please read with care [[WP:ATT]]), I will have no reason to take them away, for the same reason I would not remove the correction of a typo error.-- +++$+++ :Lets put it this way: if your edits fully respect wikipedia policies, are carefully backed with ''reliable'' sources (please, please read with care [[WP:ATT]]), I will have no reason to take them away, for the same reason I would not remove the correction of a typo error.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:13, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
537884 +++$+++ 203.59.172.94 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537882 +++$+++ 537883 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.187978220E09 +++$+++ Thank you for allowing my edits as long as they abide by Wikipedia's policies. On another hand, [[User:Mr. Neutron|Mr. Neutron]] reverts most of my edits which benefit certain articles because he has a personal grudge against me.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for allowing my edits as long as they abide by Wikipedia's policies. On another hand, [[User:Mr. Neutron|Mr. Neutron]] reverts most of my edits which benefit certain articles because he has a personal grudge against me. [[User:203.59.172.94|203.59.172.94]] 10:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

275741 +++$+++ Leotohill +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-23 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.151059440E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Leotohill|Leotohill]] 03:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
275742 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275741 +++$+++ 275741 +++$+++ 2006-06-23 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.151060280E09 +++$+++ I'm quite certain.  [http:\/\/www.artima.com\/forums\/flat.jsp?forum=152&thread=78340 Read this], which has a pretty good list of where the .NET Framework is used in various MS products as of late 2004.   +++$+++ :I'm quite certain.  [http://www.artima.com/forums/flat.jsp?forum=152&thread=78340 Read this], which has a pretty good list of where the .NET Framework is used in various MS products as of late 2004.  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 03:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

275743 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-24 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.151155860E09 +++$+++ Hey, now that WinFS is ''dead'' (in MS' word, evolved), what do u suppose should be done with its article? --'' +++$+++ Hey, now that WinFS is ''dead'' (in MS' word, evolved), what do u suppose should be done with its article? --''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">soum</font>]]''<sup>সৌমো</sup>''[[User Talk:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">yasch</font>]]'' 06:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
275744 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275743 +++$+++ 275743 +++$+++ 2006-06-24 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.151196300E09 +++$+++ We need to see where Microsoft goes with the tech that they're retaining.  It sounds like ADO.NET 3.0 (or whatever it's going to be called) is going to be a pretty huge leap forward, given that it will have both LINQ and Entities.[http:\/\/msdn.microsoft.com\/data\/ http:\/\/msdn.microsoft.com\/data\/] has seen a lot of updates since TechEd about the new ADO.NET, so that's where we need to start.  I'm really hoping that we can retain and recycle some of the great stuff you and I wrote into the article over the last six months.  As for the WinFS article itself, we can keep the whole thing... it still accurately describes what WinFS was, but we will need to update it to drop any kind of \"this is what's coming\" language.  +++$+++ :We need to see where Microsoft goes with the tech that they're retaining.  It sounds like ADO.NET 3.0 (or whatever it's going to be called) is going to be a pretty huge leap forward, given that it will have both LINQ and Entities.[http://msdn.microsoft.com/data/ http://msdn.microsoft.com/data/] has seen a lot of updates since TechEd about the new ADO.NET, so that's where we need to start.  I'm really hoping that we can retain and recycle some of the great stuff you and I wrote into the article over the last six months.  As for the WinFS article itself, we can keep the whole thing... it still accurately describes what WinFS was, but we will need to update it to drop any kind of "this is what's coming" language. [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 17:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
275745 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275743 +++$+++ 275744 +++$+++ 2006-06-25 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.151250840E09 +++$+++ Long back I had a feeling this was coming...when reading the future plans 4 sql server, they said they were building better support for semistructured and unstructured data...which overlapped with much of WinFS's vision. I may go ahead and update sql server and ado.net articles (may be create new articles) over the coming days. --'' +++$+++ ::Long back I had a feeling this was coming...when reading the future plans 4 sql server, they said they were building better support for semistructured and unstructured data...which overlapped with much of WinFS's vision. I may go ahead and update sql server and ado.net articles (may be create new articles) over the coming days. --''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">soum</font>]]''<sup>সৌমো</sup>''[[User Talk:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">yasch</font>]]'' 08:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
275746 +++$+++ Pfc432 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275743 +++$+++ 275743 +++$+++ 2006-06-28 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.151556660E09 +++$+++ Just remember to [[sign your posts on talk pages]]. I write it here, because you may come back to look for potential repliesand then read it. -- +++$+++ :Just remember to [[sign your posts on talk pages]]. I write it here, because you may come back to look for potential repliesand then read it. --[[User:Pfc432|Pfc432]] 21:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

13600 +++$+++ Jeff Song +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ 13600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-22 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.308811140E09 +++$+++ Hi - I see you have a version of an article about Zhone. Are you planning to work on it further? Would you mind if I took your material and used it for an article I'd like to creat?  +++$+++ Hi - I see you have a version of an article about Zhone. Are you planning to work on it further? Would you mind if I took your material and used it for an article I'd like to creat? [[User:Jeff Song|Jeff Song]] ([[User talk:Jeff Song|talk]]) 23:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
13601 +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ 13600 +++$+++ 13600 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.309084320E09 +++$+++ go for it.  Good luck <font color=\"#3950A5\" size=\"1\">|\u25ba<\/font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color=\"#000070\"><b>\u03cbr\u0431an<\/b><\/font><font color=\"#4D4D4D\">\u044fene\u03c9a\u2113<\/font>]] \u2022  +++$+++ * go for it.  Good luck <font color="#3950A5" size="1">|►</font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color="#000070"><b>ϋrбan</b></font><font color="#4D4D4D">яeneωaℓ</font>]] • [[User:Urbanrenewal/talk|<font size="0" color="#BFA137">TALK</font>]] <font color="#3950A5" size="1">◄|</font> 03:32, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

275747 +++$+++ Pfc432 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-28 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.151556900E09 +++$+++ Maybe it's not the right place to ask something like this, but I was wondering whether there is somewhere a list where I can see all the available caegories to be placed in the user page. I mea, those like the ones which say where the user is from and which languages (s)he speaks. As I saw you have many of them, thought maybe you know. -- +++$+++ Maybe it's not the right place to ask something like this, but I was wondering whether there is somewhere a list where I can see all the available caegories to be placed in the user page. I mea, those like the ones which say where the user is from and which languages (s)he speaks. As I saw you have many of them, thought maybe you know. --[[User:Pfc432|Pfc432]] 21:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
275748 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275747 +++$+++ 275747 +++$+++ 2006-06-28 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.151558460E09 +++$+++ Hey, yeah, there's two ways you can go about adding categories to your user page.  You can look at [[:Category:Wikipedians|Category:Wikipedians]] and start digging through its many (, many, many) subcategories that are in there, and add as many as you like to your User page.  The other way is through userboxes... userboxes are templates that have categories built into them.  If you look at the source code for my user page, you'll see the user boxes right near the top... they are pretty easy to add in.  Have a look at [[Wikipedia:Userboxes]] and the pages underneath that for lists of the available user boxes (there are a lot of them).  Hope this helps!   +++$+++ :Hey, yeah, there's two ways you can go about adding categories to your user page.  You can look at [[:Category:Wikipedians|Category:Wikipedians]] and start digging through its many (, many, many) subcategories that are in there, and add as many as you like to your User page.  The other way is through userboxes... userboxes are templates that have categories built into them.  If you look at the source code for my user page, you'll see the user boxes right near the top... they are pretty easy to add in.  Have a look at [[Wikipedia:Userboxes]] and the pages underneath that for lists of the available user boxes (there are a lot of them).  Hope this helps!  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 22:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

537892 +++$+++ TheFEARgod +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-17 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.190062680E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Talk:Borota raid]]. It counts also for [[Amdjereme raid]]. After trying to cleanup them, some issues still persist -- +++$+++ Please see [[Talk:Borota raid]]. It counts also for [[Amdjereme raid]]. After trying to cleanup them, some issues still persist --[[User:TheFEARgod|<font color="#003399">The'''FE'''</font><font color="red">'''AR'''god</font>]] ([[User talk:TheFEARgod|'''Ч''']]) 13:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
537893 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537892 +++$+++ 537892 +++$+++ 2007-09-23 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.190535180E09 +++$+++ For Borota, I'm opposed; but after some consideration, I think that it's OK if we merge [[Amdjereme raid]].-- +++$+++ :For Borota, I'm opposed; but after some consideration, I think that it's OK if we merge [[Amdjereme raid]].--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 01:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

275749 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-29 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.151642820E09 +++$+++ I'm just curious, where's your source for this build not being a CTP? Wouldn't the release of this build to MSDN and TechNet make it a CTP? \u2014  +++$+++ I'm just curious, where's your source for this build not being a CTP? Wouldn't the release of this build to MSDN and TechNet make it a CTP? — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 21:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
275750 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275749 +++$+++ 275749 +++$+++ 2006-06-29 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.151643180E09 +++$+++ A Microsoft employee told me this, noting that the build hasn't undergone the rigourous testing that is normally done with CTPs; aside from that, it's not called a CTP anywhere on Microsoft's sites, it's called simply \"Windows Vista Build 5456\", and that's the naming that we should stick with.  +++$+++ :A Microsoft employee told me this, noting that the build hasn't undergone the rigourous testing that is normally done with CTPs; aside from that, it's not called a CTP anywhere on Microsoft's sites, it's called simply "Windows Vista Build 5456", and that's the naming that we should stick with. [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 21:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
275751 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275749 +++$+++ 275750 +++$+++ 2006-06-29 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.151643300E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks! Robert McLaws made me a little confused. :-) \u2014  +++$+++ ::Okay, thanks! Robert McLaws made me a little confused. :-) — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 21:55, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

537895 +++$+++ BrianSmithson +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.190273640E09 +++$+++ [[Chad]] is on the main page, so congratulations! It's really nice to see an African country featured like this. Good job on the rewrite, and I'll try to do my part to fight the inevitable vandalism. \u2014  +++$+++ [[Chad]] is on the main page, so congratulations! It's really nice to see an African country featured like this. Good job on the rewrite, and I'll try to do my part to fight the inevitable vandalism. — [[User:BrianSmithson|Brian]] ([[user talk:BrianSmithson|<small>talk</small>]]) 00:34, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
537896 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537895 +++$+++ 537895 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.190275440E09 +++$+++ Thanks Brian: this is also thanks to you, as you helped me detecting the problems with the article, especially, in the \"culture\" section, and gave it a thorough rewrite, a thing I could hardly have been able to do on my own, assuring the article would have a decent prose. For all this, thanks! :-)-- +++$+++ :Thanks Brian: this is also thanks to you, as you helped me detecting the problems with the article, especially, in the "culture" section, and gave it a thorough rewrite, a thing I could hardly have been able to do on my own, assuring the article would have a decent prose. For all this, thanks! :-)--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 01:04, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

275753 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-04 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.152052560E09 +++$+++ Hey, dont see ur name much on my watchlist. so when it did, just dropped in to say hi. --'' +++$+++ Hey, dont see ur name much on my watchlist. so when it did, just dropped in to say hi. --''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">soum</font>]]''<sup>সৌমো</sup>''[[User Talk:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">yasch</font>]]'' 15:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
275754 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275753 +++$+++ 275753 +++$+++ 2006-07-04 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.152053280E09 +++$+++ Say, what does \"\u09b8\u09cc\u09ae\u09cb\" mean?   +++$+++ :Say, what does "সৌমো" mean?  [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 15:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
275755 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275753 +++$+++ 275754 +++$+++ 2006-07-04 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.152053640E09 +++$+++ And \u09b8\u09cc\u09ae\u09cb is just my name in [[Bengali language|Bengali]]. --'' +++$+++ ::And সৌমো is just my name in [[Bengali language|Bengali]]. --''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">soum</font>]]''<sup>সৌমো</sup>''[[User Talk:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">yasch</font>]]'' 15:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

275756 +++$+++ Zetawoof +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-05 06:08:00 +++$+++ 1.152104880E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Choco_chip_cookie.jpg|100px|thumb|Mmmmm.]] Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. Here, have a cookie.  +++$+++ [[Image:Choco_chip_cookie.jpg|100px|thumb|Mmmmm.]] Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. Here, have a cookie. [[User:Zetawoof|Zetawoof]]<sup>([[User_talk:Zetawoof|&zeta;]])</sup> 06:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
275757 +++$+++ Boxflux +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275756 +++$+++ 275756 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.152105480E09 +++$+++ Ditto - cheers for clearing up my talk page too. I'm afraid I have no foodstuffs to offer... :-) -- +++$+++ :Ditto - cheers for clearing up my talk page too. I'm afraid I have no foodstuffs to offer... :-) --[[User:Boxflux|Boxflux]] 06:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

275758 +++$+++ RN +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275758 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-08 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.152363840E09 +++$+++ Hi Warrens - glad you're still here :). Anyway, what do you think this edit of mine regarding the criticism? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Microsoft&diff=62684476&oldid=62661126] - trying to simplify it as per the anon's comments on the talk page. Better\/worse?  +++$+++ Hi Warrens - glad you're still here :). Anyway, what do you think this edit of mine regarding the criticism? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft&diff=62684476&oldid=62661126] - trying to simplify it as per the anon's comments on the talk page. Better/worse? [[User:RN|RN]] 06:04, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
275759 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275758 +++$+++ 275758 +++$+++ 2006-07-08 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.152366120E09 +++$+++ Man, I'm excited to see this article making it to the front-page in a few days... I'm sure you are too!  We'll need to keep on our toes on Tuesday though... front-page status brings a lot of visibility.  I'll have a careful read-through of the article over the weekend and see if I can find a few final things to tidy up before the flood comes. :)  +++$+++ :Man, I'm excited to see this article making it to the front-page in a few days... I'm sure you are too!  We'll need to keep on our toes on Tuesday though... front-page status brings a lot of visibility.  I'll have a careful read-through of the article over the weekend and see if I can find a few final things to tidy up before the flood comes. :) [[User:Warrens|Warrens]] 06:42, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
275760 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275758 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.152487740E09 +++$+++ No it doesn't.  All it means is that nobody's bothered to make a category yet.  If you want to make a category for \"Failed Microsoft initiatives\", then by all means do so, and file WinFS and other appropriate articles under that; it'd be far more accurate than \"Failures\".  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> -\/-  +++$+++ ::: No it doesn't.  All it means is that nobody's bothered to make a category yet.  If you want to make a category for "Failed Microsoft initiatives", then by all means do so, and file WinFS and other appropriate articles under that; it'd be far more accurate than "Failures".  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> -/- [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 16:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
275761 +++$+++ RN +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275758 +++$+++ 275758 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.152621180E09 +++$+++ User above, you sourced that criticism to a ''blog''. Criticm especially must be referenced to a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]  +++$+++ :User above, you sourced that criticism to a ''blog''. Criticm especially must be referenced to a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] [[User:RN|RN]] 05:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
275762 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275758 +++$+++ 275758 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.152621420E09 +++$+++ You're welcome to read [[Features new to Windows Vista]], which is in the top 200 articles on Wikipedia by size (out of more than 1.2 million), simply due to the fact that there is a huge amount of new stuff in the new operating system. You're welcome to have whatever suspicions you like, but in this particular case, your suspicions are quite unfounded. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> -\/-  +++$+++ :You're welcome to read [[Features new to Windows Vista]], which is in the top 200 articles on Wikipedia by size (out of more than 1.2 million), simply due to the fact that there is a huge amount of new stuff in the new operating system. You're welcome to have whatever suspicions you like, but in this particular case, your suspicions are quite unfounded. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> -/- [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 05:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
275763 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275758 +++$+++ 275758 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.152478020E09 +++$+++ Don't bother getting snarky with me because your contribution of duplicate information was removed.  Our goal here is to write great encyclopedia articles, and that means being concise and not unnecessarily repeating ourselves.  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Windows_Vista&diff=62836855&oldid=62715413 Here's] what you entered.  Pretty much everything is already covered in the \"Graphical interfaces\" and \"Hardware requirements\" sections directly above it, including mentioning the upgrade advisor. Also, we don't employ second-person language (ie. \"you\", \"your\", etc.) when writing encyclopedia articles.  This is covered in [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Avoid_the_second_person]].  Thanks. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> -\/-  +++$+++ :Don't bother getting snarky with me because your contribution of duplicate information was removed.  Our goal here is to write great encyclopedia articles, and that means being concise and not unnecessarily repeating ourselves.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Windows_Vista&diff=62836855&oldid=62715413 Here's] what you entered.  Pretty much everything is already covered in the "Graphical interfaces" and "Hardware requirements" sections directly above it, including mentioning the upgrade advisor. Also, we don't employ second-person language (ie. "you", "your", etc.) when writing encyclopedia articles.  This is covered in [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Avoid_the_second_person]].  Thanks. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> -/- [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 13:47, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

537904 +++$+++ Eupator +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-28 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.191016080E09 +++$+++ I was in Florence two weeks ago, the homnetown of my maternal grandmother. Great city you've got there. I really liked San Miniato al Monte. I didn't get to see the Etruscan Chimaera unfortunately because everytime I went to the archeological museum it was closed. Anyhow, just wanted to say hi. Will probably upload some pictures soon.-<big>'''  +++$+++ I was in Florence two weeks ago, the homnetown of my maternal grandmother. Great city you've got there. I really liked San Miniato al Monte. I didn't get to see the Etruscan Chimaera unfortunately because everytime I went to the archeological museum it was closed. Anyhow, just wanted to say hi. Will probably upload some pictures soon.-<big>''' [[User:Eupator|<font color=#00N510>Ευπάτωρ]] '''</font></big><sup><small>[[User_Talk:Eupator|<font color=#974423>Talk!!]]</sup></small> 14:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
537905 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537904 +++$+++ 537904 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.191121260E09 +++$+++ Hi Eupator, sorry for awnsering so late, but I don't edit as much as once did and so saw it just know. It's great to hear you're in Florence, even if I must tell you I don't live anymore in Florence, as I moved upstream (upstream the [[Arno river]], that is). It's nice to hear from you, and I'm happy you like it: September is a good month to be in Florence, not too many turists, and it's generally still quite hot. Ciao,-- +++$+++ :Hi Eupator, sorry for awnsering so late, but I don't edit as much as once did and so saw it just know. It's great to hear you're in Florence, even if I must tell you I don't live anymore in Florence, as I moved upstream (upstream the [[Arno river]], that is). It's nice to hear from you, and I'm happy you like it: September is a good month to be in Florence, not too many turists, and it's generally still quite hot. Ciao,--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 20:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
537906 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537904 +++$+++ 537904 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.191108840E09 +++$+++ It's the infobox that utterly doesn't make any sense. Even if it seems to have simply used what was contained in the article, from this it deduces wild conclusions, that are certainly not there (and this I know quite well, as I worked considerably on this article).-- +++$+++ :It's the infobox that utterly doesn't make any sense. Even if it seems to have simply used what was contained in the article, from this it deduces wild conclusions, that are certainly not there (and this I know quite well, as I worked considerably on this article).--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
537907 +++$+++ Italiotis +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537904 +++$+++ 537904 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.191109680E09 +++$+++ I mean Aldux surely you agree that the Alexandrine empire did reach India. The people then did spoken ancient greek , the religion was the dodecatheon syncretic with local eastern elements , the currency was called drachma and indeed the story of macedon is linked with argead dynasty and greece before the conquest and with the four hellenistic kingdoms and roman empire after the death of Alexander. So i think it is a really helpful schimatic infobox and by removing it or altering it you simply make poorer the article. So I don t believe you should remove it and i think it should stay there unless there is a specific point you wanna make +++$+++ : I mean Aldux surely you agree that the Alexandrine empire did reach India. The people then did spoken ancient greek , the religion was the dodecatheon syncretic with local eastern elements , the currency was called drachma and indeed the story of macedon is linked with argead dynasty and greece before the conquest and with the four hellenistic kingdoms and roman empire after the death of Alexander. So i think it is a really helpful schimatic infobox and by removing it or altering it you simply make poorer the article. So I don t believe you should remove it and i think it should stay there unless there is a specific point you wanna make[[User:Italiotis|Italiotis]] 16:48, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

13620 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.309684200E09 +++$+++ Thanks  +++$+++ Thanks [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 02:10, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
13621 +++$+++ Takabeg +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13620 +++$+++ 13620 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.309684920E09 +++$+++ Because of crowdedness. I've pasted them. Now I think that users who are interested in that issue understand facts. If you want, you can paste them again.  +++$+++ : Because of crowdedness. I've pasted them. Now I think that users who are interested in that issue understand facts. If you want, you can paste them again. [[User:Takabeg|Takabeg]] ([[User talk:Takabeg|talk]]) 02:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
13622 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13620 +++$+++ 13621 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.309685460E09 +++$+++ I suspect that I do not understand your points due to English not being your first language, perhaps you can try and simplify what you are saying to make it more clear.  +++$+++ ::I suspect that I do not understand your points due to English not being your first language, perhaps you can try and simplify what you are saying to make it more clear. [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 02:31, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
13623 +++$+++ Takabeg +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13620 +++$+++ 13622 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.309685760E09 +++$+++ Yeah, English is my fifth language :) You can do as you want.  +++$+++ ::: Yeah, English is my fifth language :) You can do as you want. [[User:Takabeg|Takabeg]] ([[User talk:Takabeg|talk]]) 02:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

497570 +++$+++ Tachikoma +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ 497570 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-14 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.158292620E09 +++$+++ Hi Ryan, please get well soon! --[[User:Tachikoma|Tachikom]] +++$+++ Hi Ryan, please get well soon! --[[User:Tachikoma|Tachikom]][[User:Tachikoma/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]] 20:57, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
497571 +++$+++ Fang Aili +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ 497570 +++$+++ 497570 +++$+++ 2006-09-14 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.158293760E09 +++$+++ Yes, I hope you feel better soon! -- +++$+++ :Yes, I hope you feel better soon! --[[User:Fang Aili|Fang Aili]] <sup>[[User talk:Fang Aili|<font color="green">talk</font>]]</sup> 21:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

275766 +++$+++ Cwolfsheep +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-10 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.152597720E09 +++$+++ Wow. I do like that response actually. Ever since I started [[WP:INT]], I've heard some interesting viewpoints other than Deletionist garbage or a wayward fool. I'll keep your insight in mind, and I invite you to bring it to the project as something people should think about when optimizing.  +++$+++ Wow. I do like that response actually. Ever since I started [[WP:INT]], I've heard some interesting viewpoints other than Deletionist garbage or a wayward fool. I'll keep your insight in mind, and I invite you to bring it to the project as something people should think about when optimizing. [[User:Cwolfsheep|Cwolfsheep]] 23:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
275767 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275766 +++$+++ 275766 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.152599520E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I appreciate that!  The work you're doing is definitely important and necessary, even if all that comes of it is some good discussion about what the right balance between esoteria and generalisation is.  Easy question to ask... hard to come up with a good answer to, not to mention implementing it well!  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> -\/-  +++$+++ : Thanks, I appreciate that!  The work you're doing is definitely important and necessary, even if all that comes of it is some good discussion about what the right balance between esoteria and generalisation is.  Easy question to ask... hard to come up with a good answer to, not to mention implementing it well!  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> -/- [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 23:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

13625 +++$+++ The Master of Mayhem +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.309753860E09 +++$+++ I'l probably tackle them tomorrow. It's 22:30 here and I am beginning to feel as if I slept in a room full of Scotch.--''<font face=\"Copperplate Gothic Bold\"> +++$+++ I'l probably tackle them tomorrow. It's 22:30 here and I am beginning to feel as if I slept in a room full of Scotch.--''<font face="Copperplate Gothic Bold">[[User:The Master of Mayhem|<font color="brown">The</font>]]</font>'' '''<font face="Comic Sans MS"> [[User talk:The Master of Mayhem|<font color="red">wikifyer's corner</font>]]</font>''' 21:31, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
13626 +++$+++ The Master of Mayhem +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13625 +++$+++ 13625 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.309755480E09 +++$+++ They will be done by tomorrow evening. I am going to Cavan tomorrow. Good night.--''<font face=\"Copperplate Gothic Bold\"> +++$+++ :They will be done by tomorrow evening. I am going to Cavan tomorrow. Good night.--''<font face="Copperplate Gothic Bold">[[User:The Master of Mayhem|<font color="brown">The</font>]]</font>'' '''<font face="Comic Sans MS"> [[User talk:The Master of Mayhem|<font color="red">wikifyer's corner</font>]]</font>''' 21:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

537916 +++$+++ Llywrch +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-23 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.193183280E09 +++$+++ The use of \"retard\" there is very jarring, & I was wondering if this is either a bit of vandalism that has snuck in under the radar, or just an artifact of a bad translation into English. (It's obvious that \"anf\" is a typo.) Can you shed some light on this? Thanks,  +++$+++ The use of "retard" there is very jarring, & I was wondering if this is either a bit of vandalism that has snuck in under the radar, or just an artifact of a bad translation into English. (It's obvious that "anf" is a typo.) Can you shed some light on this? Thanks, [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] 16:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
537917 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537916 +++$+++ 537916 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.193184240E09 +++$+++ Actually, it's even simpler than that: it's a result of my bad knowledge of English, which makes me use eccentric terms. Even if, looking better, since the original source was French and not English, this also probably played a role. I'll correct immediately \"retard\" with \"delay\". And thanks a lot for noting the peer review; I had lost any hope somebody would care to leave me a note there! Thanks again, and ciao.-- +++$+++ :Actually, it's even simpler than that: it's a result of my bad knowledge of English, which makes me use eccentric terms. Even if, looking better, since the original source was French and not English, this also probably played a role. I'll correct immediately "retard" with "delay". And thanks a lot for noting the peer review; I had lost any hope somebody would care to leave me a note there! Thanks again, and ciao.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 17:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

13629 +++$+++ The Master of Mayhem +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13629 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.309825200E09 +++$+++ You gave me three things to work on. One and three are done. What do you mean by number 2? And I'm assuming that the \"after what?\" bit corresponds with \"after the film\".--''<font face=\"Copperplate Gothic Bold\"> +++$+++ You gave me three things to work on. One and three are done. What do you mean by number 2? And I'm assuming that the "after what?" bit corresponds with "after the film".--''<font face="Copperplate Gothic Bold">[[User:The Master of Mayhem|<font color="brown">The</font>]]</font>'' '''<font face="Comic Sans MS"> [[User talk:The Master of Mayhem|<font color="red">wikifyer's corner</font>]]</font>''' 17:20, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
13630 +++$+++ The Master of Mayhem +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13629 +++$+++ 13629 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.309828020E09 +++$+++ I'l look on it afterwards. I need dinner and a shower, and we are heading to Navan tomorrow.--''<font face=\"Copperplate Gothic Bold\"> +++$+++ :I'l look on it afterwards. I need dinner and a shower, and we are heading to Navan tomorrow.--''<font face="Copperplate Gothic Bold">[[User:The Master of Mayhem|<font color="brown">The</font>]]</font>'' '''<font face="Comic Sans MS"> [[User talk:The Master of Mayhem|<font color="red">wikifyer's corner</font>]]</font>''' 18:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
13631 +++$+++ The Master of Mayhem +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13629 +++$+++ 13630 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.310176440E09 +++$+++ Would you mind telling me what needs done with your second bit of advice? I still don't have a clue.--''<font face=\"Copperplate Gothic Bold\"> +++$+++ ::Would you mind telling me what needs done with your second bit of advice? I still don't have a clue.--''<font face="Copperplate Gothic Bold">[[User:The Master of Mayhem|<font color="brown">The</font>]]</font>'' '''<font face="Comic Sans MS"> [[User talk:The Master of Mayhem|<font color="red">wikifyer's corner</font>]]</font>''' 18:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

275774 +++$+++ Konczewski +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-11 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.152650520E09 +++$+++ I'm not trying to argue with you, but merely trying to understand your position. +++$+++ I'm not trying to argue with you, but merely trying to understand your position.[[User:Konczewski|Konczewski]] 13:42, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
275775 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275774 +++$+++ 275774 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.152654660E09 +++$+++ It's really very straightforward.  Read the first definition of [[American]].  Outside of the Americas, most people use the term \"American\" to describe someone who is from the Americas, not just the United States. I realise that's not a popular viewpoint in the United States, but we do write for a worldwide audience on Wikipedia. Stating that George Carlin (or anyone, really) is from the United States is therefore more accurate than saying they are from \"America\".  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> -\/-  +++$+++ :It's really very straightforward.  Read the first definition of [[American]].  Outside of the Americas, most people use the term "American" to describe someone who is from the Americas, not just the United States. I realise that's not a popular viewpoint in the United States, but we do write for a worldwide audience on Wikipedia. Stating that George Carlin (or anyone, really) is from the United States is therefore more accurate than saying they are from "America".  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> -/- [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 14:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
275776 +++$+++ Konczewski +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275774 +++$+++ 275775 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.152665100E09 +++$+++ I see it as a difference between a noun and an adjective.  After all, I wouldn't refer to you as a \"Canada\" wikipedian, but a \"Canadian\" one.  Similarly, I've noticed most entries for British cicizens use \"British\", not \"United Kingdom\", to describe them. Since I don't think \"United Statesian\" is in common usage, \"American\" seems the better fit to me, and I'm pretty most readers outside this continent will understand what's meant by it.  But I respect your right to use whichever term you think is most aesthically fit, and will leave the edit as it stands.   +++$+++ ::I see it as a difference between a noun and an adjective.  After all, I wouldn't refer to you as a "Canada" wikipedian, but a "Canadian" one.  Similarly, I've noticed most entries for British cicizens use "British", not "United Kingdom", to describe them. Since I don't think "United Statesian" is in common usage, "American" seems the better fit to me, and I'm pretty most readers outside this continent will understand what's meant by it.  But I respect your right to use whichever term you think is most aesthically fit, and will leave the edit as it stands.  [[User:Konczewski|Konczewski]] 17:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
275777 +++$+++ Leotohill +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275774 +++$+++ 275775 +++$+++ 2006-07-13 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.152828840E09 +++$+++ Warrens, [[Americas]] says \"... most of the English-speaking world (including Canada) uses the word to refer solely to a citizen, resident, or national of the United States of America.\" No evidence is provided - I don't know who is right. Or righter.  +++$+++ :: Warrens, [[Americas]] says "... most of the English-speaking world (including Canada) uses the word to refer solely to a citizen, resident, or national of the United States of America." No evidence is provided - I don't know who is right. Or righter. [[User:Leotohill|Leotohill]] 15:14, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

13632 +++$+++ TaerkastUA +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.309894140E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for the copyedit. Maybe the 6th FAC will be the charm :). -- +++$+++ Thanks a lot for the copyedit. Maybe the 6th FAC will be the charm :). --[[User:TaerkastUA|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Tærkast'''</span>]] ([[User talk:TaerkastUA|'''Discuss''']]) 12:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
13633 +++$+++ TaerkastUA +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13632 +++$+++ 13632 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.312655580E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I just hope it passes! -- +++$+++ :Thanks, I just hope it passes! --[[User:TaerkastUA|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Tærkast'''</span>]] ([[User talk:TaerkastUA|'''Discuss''']]) 11:33, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

13634 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13634 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.309899360E09 +++$+++ I have also corrected some of the grammar from your recent edits today :\xac)  +++$+++ I have also corrected some of the grammar from your recent edits today :¬) [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 13:56, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
13635 +++$+++ Takabeg +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13634 +++$+++ 13634 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.309934400E09 +++$+++ \xc7ok Merci. I put <nowiki>{{Citation needed|date=July 2011}}<\/nowiki> in that section of the article [[Turkish invasion of Cyprus]], because there is no sources of third party.  +++$+++ : Çok Merci. I put <nowiki>{{Citation needed|date=July 2011}}</nowiki> in that section of the article [[Turkish invasion of Cyprus]], because there is no sources of third party. [[User:Takabeg|Takabeg]] ([[User talk:Takabeg|talk]]) 23:40, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

613942 +++$+++ WiZeNgAmOtX +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-10 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.257875160E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Rouge_admin is a very offensive page and should not exist. Also, you should not be an administrator. You are violating policy.  +++$+++ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Rouge_admin is a very offensive page and should not exist. Also, you should not be an administrator. You are violating policy. [[User:WiZeNgAmOtX|WiZeNgAmOtX]] ([[User talk:WiZeNgAmOtX|talk]]) 09:46, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
613943 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613942 +++$+++ 613942 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.257882720E09 +++$+++ Always glad to assist,  +++$+++ :Always glad to assist, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 11:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

275782 +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275782 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-23 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.153695720E09 +++$+++ Sorry for making your work on that reference for \"Frosting\" referring to Plus for Chicago - I added that a year ago before sourcing every single edit was such a big push.  If you need help with some of these let me know.  +++$+++ Sorry for making your work on that reference for "Frosting" referring to Plus for Chicago - I added that a year ago before sourcing every single edit was such a big push.  If you need help with some of these let me know. [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] 16:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
275783 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275782 +++$+++ 275782 +++$+++ 2006-07-23 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.153696740E09 +++$+++ Hey. :-)  I have it in mind to get as many references as possible that can be traced back to Microsoft employees, press releases, etc.... it's actually kind of fun to sort all this out! Right now I'm seeing if I can find some sources for Detroit, Snowball, and other older ones.  Many of them should be pretty easy to track down a confirmation for, especially the NT Family and most of the ones in Others, so if you want to help out with that, that'd be great. If we can get this taken care of, and get some additional formatting and copy editing done, we should look at getting it submitted as a featured list. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> -\/-  +++$+++ : Hey. :-)  I have it in mind to get as many references as possible that can be traced back to Microsoft employees, press releases, etc.... it's actually kind of fun to sort all this out! Right now I'm seeing if I can find some sources for Detroit, Snowball, and other older ones.  Many of them should be pretty easy to track down a confirmation for, especially the NT Family and most of the ones in Others, so if you want to help out with that, that'd be great. If we can get this taken care of, and get some additional formatting and copy editing done, we should look at getting it submitted as a featured list. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> -/- [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 16:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

13641 +++$+++ Aichikawa +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13641 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310246940E09 +++$+++ I got busy with a bunch of other things and had limited access to the Internet: I actually, amazingly, don't have Internet connection at home (on purpose because at work I have too much access to it), and I was off work. But now I'm b-a-c-k!-- +++$+++ I got busy with a bunch of other things and had limited access to the Internet: I actually, amazingly, don't have Internet connection at home (on purpose because at work I have too much access to it), and I was off work. But now I'm b-a-c-k!--[[User:Aichikawa|Aichikawa]] ([[User talk:Aichikawa|talk]]) 14:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
13642 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13641 +++$+++ 13641 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.310203320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid#top|talk]]) 02:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

275788 +++$+++ AlistairMcMillan +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-29 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.154232360E09 +++$+++ Sorry.  I did look to see if there was some discussion somewhere that I could add my five cents to, but aside from a single comment by Tiki and the mention from early 2004 I couldn't find any.  Didn't think to check the Talk page history.   +++$+++ Sorry.  I did look to see if there was some discussion somewhere that I could add my five cents to, but aside from a single comment by Tiki and the mention from early 2004 I couldn't find any.  Didn't think to check the Talk page history.  [[User:AlistairMcMillan|AlistairMcMillan]] 21:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
275789 +++$+++ Cwolfsheep +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275788 +++$+++ 275788 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.154314440E09 +++$+++ I can't remember if replying to you on my talk page or not will prompt you: just letting you know I did.  +++$+++ *I can't remember if replying to you on my talk page or not will prompt you: just letting you know I did. [[User:Cwolfsheep|Cwolfsheep]] 19:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
275790 +++$+++ Cwolfsheep +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275788 +++$+++ 275788 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.154318640E09 +++$+++ I've pulled any standing [[WP:INT]] templates from your categories & deployed [[Template:CatMaintain]]. I'm done stepping on your toes, and other people shouldn't make changes you will end up opposing anyhow. I'll stick to finishing cleaning up [[Wikipedia:Proposed mergers]].  +++$+++ *I've pulled any standing [[WP:INT]] templates from your categories & deployed [[Template:CatMaintain]]. I'm done stepping on your toes, and other people shouldn't make changes you will end up opposing anyhow. I'll stick to finishing cleaning up [[Wikipedia:Proposed mergers]]. [[User:Cwolfsheep|Cwolfsheep]] 21:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

13645 +++$+++ Shaibalahmar +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310424900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your helpful comments about this article. Since your review, serious editing has taken place and I think the points you raised have now been addressed. Also, the photo of Odo Bushop of Bayeux has been removed, together with those considered superfluous. There have been a couple of developments not directly linked to your review - two photos in the Economy section have been replaced (Aylesford Newsprint and Ditton Laboratory) with new ones (of the same subject) and one completely new photo of the Hermitage Quarry has been added.  +++$+++ Thanks for your helpful comments about this article. Since your review, serious editing has taken place and I think the points you raised have now been addressed. Also, the photo of Odo Bushop of Bayeux has been removed, together with those considered superfluous. There have been a couple of developments not directly linked to your review - two photos in the Economy section have been replaced (Aylesford Newsprint and Ditton Laboratory) with new ones (of the same subject) and one completely new photo of the Hermitage Quarry has been added. [[User:Shaibalahmar|Shaibalahmar]] ([[User talk:Shaibalahmar|talk]]) 15:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
13646 +++$+++ Shaibalahmar +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13645 +++$+++ 13645 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.310992560E09 +++$+++ Hooray! Thanks very much for all your help and patience. This was my first Good Article and I have learned a lot about editing, not to mention Ditton. Cheers +++$+++ : Hooray! Thanks very much for all your help and patience. This was my first Good Article and I have learned a lot about editing, not to mention Ditton. Cheers[[User:Shaibalahmar|Shaibalahmar]] ([[User talk:Shaibalahmar|talk]]) 05:36, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

275791 +++$+++ Haeleth +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275791 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-01 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.154454600E09 +++$+++ &mdash;  +++$+++ &mdash; [[User:Haeleth|Haeleth]] <small>[[User_talk:Haeleth|Talk]]</small> 10:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
275792 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275791 +++$+++ 275791 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.154469660E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I noticed the anon's IPs are from a German ISP.  I work a lot with Microsoft articles so I'm getting used to strongly \"anti-Microsoft\" types calling me all sorts of things because I actually demand verifiability and neutrality in prose.  Ah well.  I added a user box per your suggestion! :-) Thanks for the nice comment, have a good day. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :Yeah, I noticed the anon's IPs are from a German ISP.  I work a lot with Microsoft articles so I'm getting used to strongly "anti-Microsoft" types calling me all sorts of things because I actually demand verifiability and neutrality in prose.  Ah well.  I added a user box per your suggestion! :-) Thanks for the nice comment, have a good day. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 15:01, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

537936 +++$+++ PHG +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537936 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.203210900E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux. I am again being attacked by Elonka and some of her supporters at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Franco-Mongol alliance\/Workshop]]. Could you kindly give your opinion? Thank you.  +++$+++ Hi Aldux. I am again being attacked by Elonka and some of her supporters at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Franco-Mongol alliance/Workshop]]. Could you kindly give your opinion? Thank you. [[User:PHG|PHG]] ([[User talk:PHG|talk]]) 17:15, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
537937 +++$+++ Zenanarh +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537936 +++$+++ 537936 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.211354700E09 +++$+++ Aldux, can we introduce a new template - \"Template:Afrika paprika\" - for such cases? I'm accused for the 3rd time to be this guy. It would make much easier for Droppers to accuse me next time.  +++$+++ :Aldux, can we introduce a new template - "Template:Afrika paprika" - for such cases? I'm accused for the 3rd time to be this guy. It would make much easier for Droppers to accuse me next time. [[User:Zenanarh|Zenanarh]] ([[User talk:Zenanarh|talk]]) 00:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
537938 +++$+++ Eurocopter tigre +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537936 +++$+++ 537936 +++$+++ 2008-02-19 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.203468300E09 +++$+++ The February 2008 [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] election has begun.  We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates.  Please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Coordinators\/February 2008|vote here]] by February 28! -- +++$+++ :The February 2008 [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] election has begun.  We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates.  Please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/February 2008|vote here]] by February 28! --[[User:Eurocopter tigre|Eurocopter tigre]] ([[User talk:Eurocopter tigre|talk]]) 16:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

275794 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-03 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.154640840E09 +++$+++ ''What'' did you do to [[Microsoft Data Access Components]]?!? My entire history has been removed because of the way you moved the page! I'm sure it's a mistake, but please be careful. I'm going to merge the page as I didn't do all that work to have my history removed. -  +++$+++ ''What'' did you do to [[Microsoft Data Access Components]]?!? My entire history has been removed because of the way you moved the page! I'm sure it's a mistake, but please be careful. I'm going to merge the page as I didn't do all that work to have my history removed. - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 14:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
275795 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275794 +++$+++ 275794 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.154641740E09 +++$+++ I did the same thing I've done to just about every acronym'd article we've got on Windows -- I moved it to its full and proper name.  Chances are pretty good I didn't know about history preservation when I did that movie, since it was one of the first ones I did.  As to why it was done at all, acronyms for article names is needlessly jargonesque, and really should only be for disambiguation pages unless there is a very clear reason for something different.  So unless you've got a -really- good reason for having the article on a data access API in an operating system to co-opt a disambiguation page, then I'm going to move it back to its full name -- and I'll do it properly this time. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :I did the same thing I've done to just about every acronym'd article we've got on Windows -- I moved it to its full and proper name.  Chances are pretty good I didn't know about history preservation when I did that movie, since it was one of the first ones I did.  As to why it was done at all, acronyms for article names is needlessly jargonesque, and really should only be for disambiguation pages unless there is a very clear reason for something different.  So unless you've got a -really- good reason for having the article on a data access API in an operating system to co-opt a disambiguation page, then I'm going to move it back to its full name -- and I'll do it properly this time. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 14:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
275796 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275794 +++$+++ 275795 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.154644740E09 +++$+++ I would strongly advise you ''not'' to do that. I am somewhat of an expert on the topic, having wrote most of the article, and I can assure you that it is most commonly known as MDAC, ''not'' Microsoft Data Access Components. We use the most commonly used names on Wikipedia, and have done so ever since the start of the project. If you have been expanding acronyms, there may be cases where you can do that, but in ''many'' cases you should ''not'' be doing that. Please also desist from doing [[Wikipedia:How to fix cut and paste moves|copy and paste article moves]], you are destroying article histories and making life difficult for administrators who have clean up after you. -  +++$+++ ::I would strongly advise you ''not'' to do that. I am somewhat of an expert on the topic, having wrote most of the article, and I can assure you that it is most commonly known as MDAC, ''not'' Microsoft Data Access Components. We use the most commonly used names on Wikipedia, and have done so ever since the start of the project. If you have been expanding acronyms, there may be cases where you can do that, but in ''many'' cases you should ''not'' be doing that. Please also desist from doing [[Wikipedia:How to fix cut and paste moves|copy and paste article moves]], you are destroying article histories and making life difficult for administrators who have clean up after you. - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 15:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
275797 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275794 +++$+++ 275796 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.154645580E09 +++$+++ P.S. in case this has come across overly harsh (I think it perhaps has), I'd like to say that I do appreciate your contributions a great deal. -  +++$+++ :::P.S. in case this has come across overly harsh (I think it perhaps has), I'd like to say that I do appreciate your contributions a great deal. - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 15:53, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
275798 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275794 +++$+++ 275796 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.154649840E09 +++$+++ Look, I work pretty hard to keep the hundreds of Windows and OS X articles we've got free of bull, while also striving to improve the consistency and quality of what's presented.  I do put a lot of thought (and a lot of research) into these things so that Wikipedia can do the subject justice.  You're coming across as someone with [[WP:OWN]] issues, and I ''know'' you are a better and more considerate editor than that.  Give my stance some thought. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :::Look, I work pretty hard to keep the hundreds of Windows and OS X articles we've got free of bull, while also striving to improve the consistency and quality of what's presented.  I do put a lot of thought (and a lot of research) into these things so that Wikipedia can do the subject justice.  You're coming across as someone with [[WP:OWN]] issues, and I ''know'' you are a better and more considerate editor than that.  Give my stance some thought. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 17:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
275799 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275794 +++$+++ 275798 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.154670840E09 +++$+++ As for coming across [[WP:OWN]] - mate, do you ''know'' how long it took me to write that article? When you moved the page the way you did, you destroyed the history and basically violated the GFDL because it doesn't give me due credit. I have been forced to do an article history merge. You also destroyed the history of the talk page! -  +++$+++ ::::As for coming across [[WP:OWN]] - mate, do you ''know'' how long it took me to write that article? When you moved the page the way you did, you destroyed the history and basically violated the GFDL because it doesn't give me due credit. I have been forced to do an article history merge. You also destroyed the history of the talk page! - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 22:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
275800 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275794 +++$+++ 275799 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.154683080E09 +++$+++ I've renamed the article back to [[Microsoft Data Access Components]], where it has sat for months with not a single complaint, and where it fit in quite nicely with all the other related articles that ''have full names''.  Since I know you're going to disagree with this, I really ''very strongly'' encourage you to take a more level-headed and consensus-building approach if you are going to continue this discussion.  If you can't afford me the decency of [[Wikipedia:Consensus|polite discussion and negotiation, in an attempt to develop a consensus]], then back off and find something else to work on that isn't going to piss you off and cause undue friction.  Or, get someone to mediate, or file an RFC or whatever.  I'll certainly co-operate; I think my case is much stronger than yours, since it's built on prevailing consensus and what others before me have done... not my own opinion or emotional investment in a particular article.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::::: I've renamed the article back to [[Microsoft Data Access Components]], where it has sat for months with not a single complaint, and where it fit in quite nicely with all the other related articles that ''have full names''.  Since I know you're going to disagree with this, I really ''very strongly'' encourage you to take a more level-headed and consensus-building approach if you are going to continue this discussion.  If you can't afford me the decency of [[Wikipedia:Consensus|polite discussion and negotiation, in an attempt to develop a consensus]], then back off and find something else to work on that isn't going to piss you off and cause undue friction.  Or, get someone to mediate, or file an RFC or whatever.  I'll certainly co-operate; I think my case is much stronger than yours, since it's built on prevailing consensus and what others before me have done... not my own opinion or emotional investment in a particular article.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 02:18, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
275801 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275794 +++$+++ 275800 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.154705520E09 +++$+++ To be honest, though, I'm most upset about the article move because it lost the history. I spent a ''very'' long time on the article, and author attribution is one of the cornerstones of the site. -  +++$+++ ::::::To be honest, though, I'm most upset about the article move because it lost the history. I spent a ''very'' long time on the article, and author attribution is one of the cornerstones of the site. - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 08:32, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
275802 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275794 +++$+++ 275801 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.154740500E09 +++$+++ Your abrasive attitude here doesn't really motivate me to apologise for a technical error I made almost half a year ago as a new editor.  The only thing you'll get from me with this approach is an assurance that I'm much more aware of those kinds of issues now and it's not the kind of mistake I make anymore. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::::::: Your abrasive attitude here doesn't really motivate me to apologise for a technical error I made almost half a year ago as a new editor.  The only thing you'll get from me with this approach is an assurance that I'm much more aware of those kinds of issues now and it's not the kind of mistake I make anymore. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 18:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

537940 +++$+++ Soft needed +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537940 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-27 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.204167720E09 +++$+++ What's wrong with the source that I provided? This is an originally published book and more over the author points out sources as well. Plus it is known for certain that the Caliphate had contacts with the Balkans and that it even reached Thessalon\xedki in the 8th century. What reference do you want - a Harvard text book or a CIA published document? Why everything about Pomaks that comes from Muslim authors is considered a lie or not reliable and everything that comes from Bulgarian and Greek authors is directly considered a truth? You want proofs - here is one: the mosque Sultan Bayazid in the village of Kochan was built in the 8th century and it is inscripted in ancient stone on the mosque. If you are suspicios about it go and check it yourselv. Actually I posted the image on Wikipedia, but it was deleted. I don't know what's wrong with you here - you simply deny to even think about Muslims on the Balkans before the Ottomans asif we are talking about Muslims on Mars. If you don't accept it at least don't deprive the people of the information that it is '''possible''' that Muslims lived in the Balkans before the Turks. Even when research is available. Nobody here says that all Pomaks converted to Islam at that time and actualy I noted that '''maybe no Pomaks''' converted to Islam at that time. Whe must provide all possible theories and all facts and the users have to draw their conclusions by themselves. This is the idea of Wikipedia. If it is possible that some Pomaks might have been Muslims before the Turks, we have to have it on the Wikipedia, especially when we have a source, citing other sources. I really don't understand what is wrong with you. -- +++$+++ What's wrong with the source that I provided? This is an originally published book and more over the author points out sources as well. Plus it is known for certain that the Caliphate had contacts with the Balkans and that it even reached Thessaloníki in the 8th century. What reference do you want - a Harvard text book or a CIA published document? Why everything about Pomaks that comes from Muslim authors is considered a lie or not reliable and everything that comes from Bulgarian and Greek authors is directly considered a truth? You want proofs - here is one: the mosque Sultan Bayazid in the village of Kochan was built in the 8th century and it is inscripted in ancient stone on the mosque. If you are suspicios about it go and check it yourselv. Actually I posted the image on Wikipedia, but it was deleted. I don't know what's wrong with you here - you simply deny to even think about Muslims on the Balkans before the Ottomans asif we are talking about Muslims on Mars. If you don't accept it at least don't deprive the people of the information that it is '''possible''' that Muslims lived in the Balkans before the Turks. Even when research is available. Nobody here says that all Pomaks converted to Islam at that time and actualy I noted that '''maybe no Pomaks''' converted to Islam at that time. Whe must provide all possible theories and all facts and the users have to draw their conclusions by themselves. This is the idea of Wikipedia. If it is possible that some Pomaks might have been Muslims before the Turks, we have to have it on the Wikipedia, especially when we have a source, citing other sources. I really don't understand what is wrong with you. --[[User:Soft needed|Soft needed]] ([[User talk:Soft needed|talk]]) 19:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
537941 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537940 +++$+++ 537940 +++$+++ 2008-02-27 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.204172220E09 +++$+++ It's simply not good enough for wikipedia, that's it, for [[WP:RS]]. Also, for such extraordinary claims, you need to pass [[WP:REDFLAG]]. Consider also [[WP:FRINGE]]. Read these links, please.-- +++$+++ :It's simply not good enough for wikipedia, that's it, for [[WP:RS]]. Also, for such extraordinary claims, you need to pass [[WP:REDFLAG]]. Consider also [[WP:FRINGE]]. Read these links, please.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] ([[User talk:Aldux#top|talk]]) 20:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
537942 +++$+++ Soft needed +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537940 +++$+++ 537941 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 08:45:00 +++$+++ 1.204217100E09 +++$+++ Actually in that article there is too much stuff that is not good enough for Wikipedia and is even unsourced at all. -- +++$+++ ::Actually in that article there is too much stuff that is not good enough for Wikipedia and is even unsourced at all. --[[User:Soft needed|Soft needed]] ([[User talk:Soft needed|talk]]) 08:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

541655 +++$+++ BorgQueen +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-17 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.211012400E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> -- +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --[[User:BorgQueen|BorgQueen]] ([[User talk:BorgQueen|talk]]) 01:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
541656 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541655 +++$+++ 541655 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.211016360E09 +++$+++ Awesome!  Jeez.  When it rains it pours.   +++$+++ :Awesome!  Jeez.  When it rains it pours.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 02:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

13655 +++$+++ 188.169.22.145 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.311951420E09 +++$+++ Hi, i think I've finished working on [[Led Zeppelin]]. It is time for your copy edit I suppose. [[Special:Contributions\/188.169.22.145|188.169.22.145]] ( +++$+++ Hi, i think I've finished working on [[Led Zeppelin]]. It is time for your copy edit I suppose. [[Special:Contributions/188.169.22.145|188.169.22.145]] ([[User talk:188.169.22.145|talk]]) 07:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
13656 +++$+++ Sabrebd +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13655 +++$+++ 13655 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.311992400E09 +++$+++ Could you hold off on that please since the recent edits go against several hard fought points of consensus.--'''<span style=\"font-family:Black Chancery;text:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;\"> +++$+++ :Could you hold off on that please since the recent edits go against several hard fought points of consensus.--'''<span style="font-family:Black Chancery;text:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">[[User:Sabrebd|<span style="color:blue;">SabreBD</span>]] ([[User talk:Sabrebd|talk</span>]]) 19:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

526564 +++$+++ Palm dogg +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-27 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.172572800E09 +++$+++ I see no problem with the Methar Lam image one you suggested.  +++$+++ I see no problem with the Methar Lam image one you suggested. [[User:Palm dogg|Palm_Dogg]] 02:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
526565 +++$+++ Palm dogg +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526564 +++$+++ 526564 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.172589060E09 +++$+++ I'm off to the field to play around with hand grenades for a week.  I leave the page in your care. :)  +++$+++ :I'm off to the field to play around with hand grenades for a week.  I leave the page in your care. :) [[User:Palm dogg|Palm_Dogg]] 07:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

275803 +++$+++ Damieng +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-05 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.154789880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding the screenshot of IIS7 to the IIS page - it's most interesting but I would suggest that you turn off ClearType before taking and submitting screenshots.   The reason for this is that ClearType is specific to LCD's.  Printed on paper, displayed on a CRT or even an LCD with a different arrangement of pixels or on a rotated LCD it looks terrible.   +++$+++ Thanks for adding the screenshot of IIS7 to the IIS page - it's most interesting but I would suggest that you turn off ClearType before taking and submitting screenshots.   The reason for this is that ClearType is specific to LCD's.  Printed on paper, displayed on a CRT or even an LCD with a different arrangement of pixels or on a rotated LCD it looks terrible.  [[User:Damieng|DamienG]] 07:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
275804 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275803 +++$+++ 275803 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.154791020E09 +++$+++ Don't forget that in Vista, ClearType is turned on by default.  If you turn off ClearType, the screenshot does not exactly represent the default way the window is displayed. \u2014  +++$+++ :Don't forget that in Vista, ClearType is turned on by default.  If you turn off ClearType, the screenshot does not exactly represent the default way the window is displayed. — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 08:17, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
275805 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275803 +++$+++ 275803 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.154791800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message.  Is your comment based on the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Internet_Information_Services_7_Console.png resized image] or the [http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/9\/95\/Internet_Information_Services_7_Console.png full-size image]?  The resized one definitely looks a bit trashy; I tried to fit it into 800x600 so that mediawiki wouldn't resize it down, but it wasn't going to be possible without leaving out some of the detail.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :Thanks for the message.  Is your comment based on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Internet_Information_Services_7_Console.png resized image] or the [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/95/Internet_Information_Services_7_Console.png full-size image]?  The resized one definitely looks a bit trashy; I tried to fit it into 800x600 so that mediawiki wouldn't resize it down, but it wasn't going to be possible without leaving out some of the detail.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 08:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
275806 +++$+++ Damieng +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275803 +++$+++ 275805 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.154902680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for sorting that.  Alex, I appreciate that ClearType is on as default but the point is a screenshot of a system with ClearType looks awful printed, on a CRT or indeed on LCD's differently arranged to that it was taken on.    +++$+++ ::Thanks for sorting that.  Alex, I appreciate that ClearType is on as default but the point is a screenshot of a system with ClearType looks awful printed, on a CRT or indeed on LCD's differently arranged to that it was taken on.   [[User:Damieng|DamienG]] 15:18, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
275807 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275803 +++$+++ 275803 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.154923740E09 +++$+++ I'm fully aware of what I did.  Releases to a very limited number of TAP testers (we're talking tens, maybe a few hundred companies here that have signed non-disclosure agreements with Microsoft, and are generally not permitted to discuss TAP releases) are not reflective of what is available to the wider testing and developer community.  Build 5472 is available to everyone with an MSDN subscription, for example, which covers hundreds of thousands of people.  It was also announced on the official Windows Vista blog, which subsequent private releases have not been.  Please note that Wikipedia operates on the principles of [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability]], not gossip and heresy; builds released to a few people are not notable, nor can we confirm such information with a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]].  These principles are more important to us than being a Vista scoop site; there's plenty of places to go for that kind of stuff on the Internet. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :I'm fully aware of what I did.  Releases to a very limited number of TAP testers (we're talking tens, maybe a few hundred companies here that have signed non-disclosure agreements with Microsoft, and are generally not permitted to discuss TAP releases) are not reflective of what is available to the wider testing and developer community.  Build 5472 is available to everyone with an MSDN subscription, for example, which covers hundreds of thousands of people.  It was also announced on the official Windows Vista blog, which subsequent private releases have not been.  Please note that Wikipedia operates on the principles of [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability]], not gossip and heresy; builds released to a few people are not notable, nor can we confirm such information with a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]].  These principles are more important to us than being a Vista scoop site; there's plenty of places to go for that kind of stuff on the Internet. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 21:09, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

13661 +++$+++ DrKiernan +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13661 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312208400E09 +++$+++ Keeping a list of everything bad user:XXX did in your user space is neither constructive nor appropriate. Perhaps we should both focus on the many positive things to do rather than the very occasional misbehavior?  +++$+++ Keeping a list of everything bad user:XXX did in your user space is neither constructive nor appropriate. Perhaps we should both focus on the many positive things to do rather than the very occasional misbehavior? [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 07:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13662 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13661 +++$+++ 13661 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312238460E09 +++$+++ Ah well, if you are going to have such a bizarre flight of fancy as far as to calling it an attack page then perhaps I will remove it. Maybe you should also look at how you interact with others?  +++$+++ :Ah well, if you are going to have such a bizarre flight of fancy as far as to calling it an attack page then perhaps I will remove it. Maybe you should also look at how you interact with others? [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid#top|talk]]) 15:41, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13663 +++$+++ DrKiernan +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13661 +++$+++ 13662 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.312344060E09 +++$+++ Instead of basing your judgement of my character on a brief fling of incivility, the private circumstances of which you are unaware, you should be basing it on the larger picture of my successful collaborations and more usual moderate language.  +++$+++ ::Instead of basing your judgement of my character on a brief fling of incivility, the private circumstances of which you are unaware, you should be basing it on the larger picture of my successful collaborations and more usual moderate language. [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 21:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13664 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13661 +++$+++ 13663 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.312348740E09 +++$+++ Please clarify what you mean by \"a brief fling of incivility\", are you referring to simply the comments that you want removed from my user space?  +++$+++ :::Please clarify what you mean by "a brief fling of incivility", are you referring to simply the comments that you want removed from my user space? [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid#top|talk]]) 22:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13665 +++$+++ DrKiernan +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13661 +++$+++ 13664 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312380120E09 +++$+++ You say I \"reverted them without an edit summary and then proceeded to leave obtuse messages\". The edit without a summary was made at exactly the same time as I opened the talk page discussion[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Blade_Runner&diff=441384465&oldid=441384217][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Blade_Runner&diff=441384620&oldid=435586839]. You reverted,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Blade_Runner&diff=next&oldid=441384465] (without discussion and without addressing the complaint in the edit summary, although I appreciate that this revert may have been the result of confusion after an edit conflict), so my second revert was accompanied by an extensive edit summary[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Blade_Runner&diff=441385707&oldid=441385231]. I see nothing obtuse in either the talk page comment or the edit summary.  +++$+++ ::::You say I "reverted them without an edit summary and then proceeded to leave obtuse messages". The edit without a summary was made at exactly the same time as I opened the talk page discussion[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blade_Runner&diff=441384465&oldid=441384217][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Blade_Runner&diff=441384620&oldid=435586839]. You reverted,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blade_Runner&diff=next&oldid=441384465] (without discussion and without addressing the complaint in the edit summary, although I appreciate that this revert may have been the result of confusion after an edit conflict), so my second revert was accompanied by an extensive edit summary[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blade_Runner&diff=441385707&oldid=441385231]. I see nothing obtuse in either the talk page comment or the edit summary. [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 07:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
13666 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13661 +++$+++ 13665 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.312381620E09 +++$+++ I tried to be nice and that didn't work, I tried to collaborate but you decided to do it your way, I left you to it - but you came here and escalated. The ball is in your court, do not simply twat it back aiming for my head again or attempt to send it off the field of play.  +++$+++ :::::I tried to be nice and that didn't work, I tried to collaborate but you decided to do it your way, I left you to it - but you came here and escalated. The ball is in your court, do not simply twat it back aiming for my head again or attempt to send it off the field of play. [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid#top|talk]]) 07:27, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
13667 +++$+++ DrKiernan +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13661 +++$+++ 13666 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.312388940E09 +++$+++ It is an attack page. It is a user space page that focuses on a single editor and lists their faults. That contravenes the policy.  +++$+++ ::::::It is an attack page. It is a user space page that focuses on a single editor and lists their faults. That contravenes the policy. [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 09:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
13668 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13661 +++$+++ 13667 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312418460E09 +++$+++ I am a patient person, and I still have hope that you will simply see the point in either: apologising and laughing it off; dropping the stick; ignoring this matter; or any other outcome where you say that you regret having accused me of an attack page and admitting you had a bad week. After we have come to that sort of conclusion maybe then I can be persuaded that it ''was'' just a bad week and I will take a similarly appropriate action? This is, after all, time we could both spend on more important tasks?  +++$+++ :::::::I am a patient person, and I still have hope that you will simply see the point in either: apologising and laughing it off; dropping the stick; ignoring this matter; or any other outcome where you say that you regret having accused me of an attack page and admitting you had a bad week. After we have come to that sort of conclusion maybe then I can be persuaded that it ''was'' just a bad week and I will take a similarly appropriate action? This is, after all, time we could both spend on more important tasks? [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid#top|talk]]) 17:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

537950 +++$+++ Wareh +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537950 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-30 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.209543600E09 +++$+++ It seems to me that date of consultation is only relevant if information from the SEP article has been used in the article.  It is optional in the template and should be omitted in the case of an external link to the SEP article.  For that matter, I can't imagine any circumstance in which it would make sense to add today's date to an existing SEP link, because, obviously, if it ''was'' used in actually researching and writing an article, that would have been on a different date.  Surely the template only allows for the date because of the desirability of dating online material ''when cited as a source consulted''.  \"A tidying editor found the link not to be dead & made a formatting change on ''X'' date\" is neither useful information that should be in the text of the encyclopedia nor what the result of these edits implies.  +++$+++ It seems to me that date of consultation is only relevant if information from the SEP article has been used in the article.  It is optional in the template and should be omitted in the case of an external link to the SEP article.  For that matter, I can't imagine any circumstance in which it would make sense to add today's date to an existing SEP link, because, obviously, if it ''was'' used in actually researching and writing an article, that would have been on a different date.  Surely the template only allows for the date because of the desirability of dating online material ''when cited as a source consulted''.  "A tidying editor found the link not to be dead & made a formatting change on ''X'' date" is neither useful information that should be in the text of the encyclopedia nor what the result of these edits implies. [[User:Wareh|Wareh]] ([[User talk:Wareh|talk]]) 01:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
537951 +++$+++ Wareh +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537950 +++$+++ 537950 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.209595860E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Wareh|Wareh]] ([[User talk:Wareh|talk]]) 15:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

275808 +++$+++ Snjrdn +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275808 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-08 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.155045180E09 +++$+++ In large thanks to yourself the Windows Vista articles are very informative. I've learned quite a bit.  +++$+++ In large thanks to yourself the Windows Vista articles are very informative. I've learned quite a bit. [[User:Snjrdn|sean]] 06:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
275809 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275808 +++$+++ 275808 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.155199260E09 +++$+++ Hey Fran Z, your English isn't that bad, really!  What you'll see me doing is trying to level things off to a consistent tone, so that the whole article sounds like one complete piece of work instead of a lot of little pieces put together.  It's actually pretty hard to do, and as time goes on I think you'll find it gets easier.  The [[Wikipedia:Manual of style]] has lots of good ideas in it, so have a read through that if you haven't already.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :Hey Fran Z, your English isn't that bad, really!  What you'll see me doing is trying to level things off to a consistent tone, so that the whole article sounds like one complete piece of work instead of a lot of little pieces put together.  It's actually pretty hard to do, and as time goes on I think you'll find it gets easier.  The [[Wikipedia:Manual of style]] has lots of good ideas in it, so have a read through that if you haven't already.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 01:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

275810 +++$+++ Peter Campbell +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275810 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.155197640E09 +++$+++ I think a separate security section heading is required in [[Windows Vista]] article as it gets prime billing in the introduction, but then has references (and criticisms) scattered throughout the rest of the article.  Do you support this?  +++$+++ I think a separate security section heading is required in [[Windows Vista]] article as it gets prime billing in the introduction, but then has references (and criticisms) scattered throughout the rest of the article.  Do you support this? [[User:Peter Campbell|Peter Campbell]] <small>[[User talk:Peter Campbell|Talk!]]</small> 01:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
275811 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275810 +++$+++ 275810 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.155199740E09 +++$+++ Hello, thanks for the comment.  This is tricky, because there's really two aspects to the security discussion: history\/rationale, and specific features... I think a section under \"New features\" for security makes some sense... have a look at [[Features new to Windows Vista]] to get an idea of what should be covered (there's a big security section here)... but at the same time, bear in mind that that article is our features breakout article, and it's where we go into much greater detail.  Anything written into [[Windows Vista]] itself needs to be concise and to-the-point.  A large majority of readers aren't going to care about ASLR and 64-bit kernel patching and the more esoteric stuff, so explanations of these things shouldn't be written in... but yeah, some of the bigger points, like the Trustworthy Computing initiative, the fact that XP SP2 & Server 2003 SP1 development delayed Vista by a year or more (that's something Steve Ballmer or some other exec said recently), and *big* security features like UAC definitely do merit further discussion.  By all means, take a shot at writing some security stuff into a new section, and we'll work it in.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Hello, thanks for the comment.  This is tricky, because there's really two aspects to the security discussion: history/rationale, and specific features... I think a section under "New features" for security makes some sense... have a look at [[Features new to Windows Vista]] to get an idea of what should be covered (there's a big security section here)... but at the same time, bear in mind that that article is our features breakout article, and it's where we go into much greater detail.  Anything written into [[Windows Vista]] itself needs to be concise and to-the-point.  A large majority of readers aren't going to care about ASLR and 64-bit kernel patching and the more esoteric stuff, so explanations of these things shouldn't be written in... but yeah, some of the bigger points, like the Trustworthy Computing initiative, the fact that XP SP2 & Server 2003 SP1 development delayed Vista by a year or more (that's something Steve Ballmer or some other exec said recently), and *big* security features like UAC definitely do merit further discussion.  By all means, take a shot at writing some security stuff into a new section, and we'll work it in.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 01:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
275812 +++$+++ Peter Campbell +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275810 +++$+++ 275811 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 06:14:00 +++$+++ 1.155215640E09 +++$+++ By the way, I thought WCF was not part of .Net 3.0, it is itemised by Microsoft as one of \"Windows Vista Technologies\" I think the are a bit schizo about this, they itemise WCF seperately AND they say it is part of .Net! --- +++$+++ ::By the way, I thought WCF was not part of .Net 3.0, it is itemised by Microsoft as one of "Windows Vista Technologies" I think the are a bit schizo about this, they itemise WCF seperately AND they say it is part of .Net! ---[[User:Peter Campbell|Peter Campbell]] <small>[[User talk:Peter Campbell|Talk!]]</small> 06:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

613947 +++$+++ Aunt Entropy +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-18 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.258598340E09 +++$+++ Hey, wonder if you will give me some input. I found an article that needs a bit of work when it comes to due scientific weight: [[Lloyd Pye]], ancient astronaut type, no mention of scientific consensus until the corralled off \"criticism\" section. As you know, I'm ignorant when it comes to actual content creating, but I do want to learn. The difficult thing is finding a decent [[bunny slope]] article that is not so bad that I run screaming from it. I'm hoping this one would be good to work on. So far I've added a small addition to the lead to mention the existence of actual science, but that's only the beginning. I'll take whatever advice you are willing to give for the next step. Thanks for all your help,  +++$+++ Hey, wonder if you will give me some input. I found an article that needs a bit of work when it comes to due scientific weight: [[Lloyd Pye]], ancient astronaut type, no mention of scientific consensus until the corralled off "criticism" section. As you know, I'm ignorant when it comes to actual content creating, but I do want to learn. The difficult thing is finding a decent [[bunny slope]] article that is not so bad that I run screaming from it. I'm hoping this one would be good to work on. So far I've added a small addition to the lead to mention the existence of actual science, but that's only the beginning. I'll take whatever advice you are willing to give for the next step. Thanks for all your help, [[User talk:Aunt Entropy|<font color="483D8B" face="lucida blackletter">Auntie E.</font>]] 18:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
613948 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613947 +++$+++ 613947 +++$+++ 2009-11-18 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.258604220E09 +++$+++ Will be delighted to assist, unfortunately some patience is needed as I'm struggling to pull something off over the next couple of days, will look at it then. In the interim, without even looking, my experience is that it's best to find sources first, and the better the sources the easier it is to write. A lot of it involves trying to say the same thing as the source in different words, turning sentences round and trying to think of alternative words with the same meaning. A thesaurus may help, usually I'm too lazy to look it up. So, that's my recommendation for the next two days, will try to look into it in more detail then. Good luck! You seem to be erudite and well able to communicate, so it should work out well. . .  +++$+++ :Will be delighted to assist, unfortunately some patience is needed as I'm struggling to pull something off over the next couple of days, will look at it then. In the interim, without even looking, my experience is that it's best to find sources first, and the better the sources the easier it is to write. A lot of it involves trying to say the same thing as the source in different words, turning sentences round and trying to think of alternative words with the same meaning. A thesaurus may help, usually I'm too lazy to look it up. So, that's my recommendation for the next two days, will try to look into it in more detail then. Good luck! You seem to be erudite and well able to communicate, so it should work out well. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
613949 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613947 +++$+++ 613948 +++$+++ 2009-11-18 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.258604520E09 +++$+++ OK, had a peek. Suggest \"In his work he argues against the overwhelming [[scientific consensus]] that humans did not [[evolve]] from earlier [[organisms]]...\" is a little ambiguous, as it's his argument that humans didn't evolve, not the scientific consensus. Try turning it round a bit, perhaps \"In his work he rejects the overwhelming scientific consensus that humans evolved from earlier organisms, and claims....\" It could be done in other ways, try playing with it on a text editor and choose what looks best to you. . .  +++$+++ ::OK, had a peek. Suggest "In his work he argues against the overwhelming [[scientific consensus]] that humans did not [[evolve]] from earlier [[organisms]]..." is a little ambiguous, as it's his argument that humans didn't evolve, not the scientific consensus. Try turning it round a bit, perhaps "In his work he rejects the overwhelming scientific consensus that humans evolved from earlier organisms, and claims...." It could be done in other ways, try playing with it on a text editor and choose what looks best to you. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:22, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
613950 +++$+++ Aunt Entropy +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613947 +++$+++ 613949 +++$+++ 2009-11-20 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.258724640E09 +++$+++ Thanks :)  +++$+++ :::Thanks :) [[User talk:Aunt Entropy|<font color="483D8B" face="lucida blackletter">Auntie E.</font>]] 05:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
613951 +++$+++ Aunt Entropy +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613947 +++$+++ 613949 +++$+++ 2009-11-20 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.258768380E09 +++$+++ Update: did some minor edits, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lloyd_Pye&diff=326902840&oldid=326881719 got reverted on one] by a recent changes patroller. Partially my fault, could've used a better edit summary, but still. Gotta watch those people. :)  +++$+++ :::Update: did some minor edits, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lloyd_Pye&diff=326902840&oldid=326881719 got reverted on one] by a recent changes patroller. Partially my fault, could've used a better edit summary, but still. Gotta watch those people. :) [[User talk:Aunt Entropy|<font color="483D8B" face="lucida blackletter">Auntie E.</font>]] 17:53, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
613952 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613947 +++$+++ 613951 +++$+++ 2009-11-20 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.258768920E09 +++$+++ Was just about to say, your edits look good to me. The additional paragraph about criticism could be fleshed out a bit, ideally mentioning the main critics and citing a reliable source: the article as a whole seems to be a bit lacking in sources, and as a BLP we have to take extra care with finding reliable citations. However, you're right to say that the lead should reflect the article. Formatting the sources (perhaps using [http:\/\/diberri.dyndns.org\/cgi-bin\/templatefiller\/?type=&id= this tool]) would be a good move. .  +++$+++ ::::Was just about to say, your edits look good to me. The additional paragraph about criticism could be fleshed out a bit, ideally mentioning the main critics and citing a reliable source: the article as a whole seems to be a bit lacking in sources, and as a BLP we have to take extra care with finding reliable citations. However, you're right to say that the lead should reflect the article. Formatting the sources (perhaps using [http://diberri.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/templatefiller/?type=&id= this tool]) would be a good move. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:02, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
613953 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613947 +++$+++ 613951 +++$+++ 2009-11-20 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.258772220E09 +++$+++ Oh boy, finding sources may be difficult, the internets is flooded with woo about this guy and not much reliable. [http:\/\/74.125.155.132\/scholar?q=cache:XkHKPsACySMJ:scholar.google.com\/+%22Lloyd+Pye%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2000 This essay] has a conclusion that suggests the expected, but not an expert opinion. [http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/r5682r5306778652\/  The Flexibility of Scientific Rhetoric: A Case Study of UFO Researchers] would be useful if you can get journal access, or contact someone who has such access and ask if they could send you a pdf. Frustratingly, the New England Skeptical Society website was playing up, but having found their article I've given way to temptation and added a formatted reference as well as making it clear that all the other external links are Pye's own pages. Have kept a pdf and saved copy of their web page, in case they start giving 404 not found again. .  +++$+++ ::::Oh boy, finding sources may be difficult, the internets is flooded with woo about this guy and not much reliable. [http://74.125.155.132/scholar?q=cache:XkHKPsACySMJ:scholar.google.com/+%22Lloyd+Pye%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2000 This essay] has a conclusion that suggests the expected, but not an expert opinion. [http://www.springerlink.com/content/r5682r5306778652/  The Flexibility of Scientific Rhetoric: A Case Study of UFO Researchers] would be useful if you can get journal access, or contact someone who has such access and ask if they could send you a pdf. Frustratingly, the New England Skeptical Society website was playing up, but having found their article I've given way to temptation and added a formatted reference as well as making it clear that all the other external links are Pye's own pages. Have kept a pdf and saved copy of their web page, in case they start giving 404 not found again. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

13669 +++$+++ Demiurge1000 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.312335600E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Awarded for your valiant efforts in holding back the tide of foolishness on my talk page. Much appreciated. -- +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Awarded for your valiant efforts in holding back the tide of foolishness on my talk page. Much appreciated. --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 18:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13670 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13669 +++$+++ 13669 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 08:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312383720E09 +++$+++ I thought it was King Cnut, not Canute. Have I missed something? [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ :I thought it was King Cnut, not Canute. Have I missed something? [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 08:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
13671 +++$+++ Demiurge1000 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13669 +++$+++ 13670 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.312387980E09 +++$+++ Cnut on some coins, Kn\xfatr on some runestones, Cnut as now the most common name and historically accurate - but \"also known as\" [[Canute]] in common English tradition most closely associated with the possibly apocryphal tale of him trying to hold back the tide. -- +++$+++ ::Cnut on some coins, Knútr on some runestones, Cnut as now the most common name and historically accurate - but "also known as" [[Canute]] in common English tradition most closely associated with the possibly apocryphal tale of him trying to hold back the tide. --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 09:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

13672 +++$+++ Diannaa +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312340160E09 +++$+++ I was looking at this article (as you may recall, it's the one that's been sitting on the Requests page since June that we decided to leave until after the drive) and there is a notice on the talk page that it is being depeloped in tandem with the parallel article on de.wiki. So I am no longer interested in re-vamping the article or treating it as a re-write. I think the best thing to do is treat is as a normal copy edit. I have copy edited the section titled \"Differnet types\". If you would like to have a go next, please find one or two sections of the article that you find manageable and do copy edits. Then, pass it along to another GOCE coordinator for more work. You can post on the Requests page as to which sections you were able to complete. Thanks in advance for any help you can offer on this difficult article. -- +++$+++ I was looking at this article (as you may recall, it's the one that's been sitting on the Requests page since June that we decided to leave until after the drive) and there is a notice on the talk page that it is being depeloped in tandem with the parallel article on de.wiki. So I am no longer interested in re-vamping the article or treating it as a re-write. I think the best thing to do is treat is as a normal copy edit. I have copy edited the section titled "Differnet types". If you would like to have a go next, please find one or two sections of the article that you find manageable and do copy edits. Then, pass it along to another GOCE coordinator for more work. You can post on the Requests page as to which sections you were able to complete. Thanks in advance for any help you can offer on this difficult article. --[[User:Diannaa|Dianna]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 19:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13673 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13672 +++$+++ 13672 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.312352760E09 +++$+++ Chain mail to Utah :\xac)  +++$+++ *Chain mail to Utah :¬) [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid#top|talk]]) 23:26, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
13674 +++$+++ The Utahraptor +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13672 +++$+++ 13673 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.312354380E09 +++$+++ :Almost did Dianna's, but I completed the section \"Definition of related terms,\" and it's over to Slon now.  +++$+++ *:Almost did Dianna's, but I completed the section "Definition of related terms," and it's over to Slon now. [[User:The Utahraptor|<font color="green">The Utahraptor</font>]][[User talk:The Utahraptor|<sup>Talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/The Utahraptor|<sub>Contribs</sub>]] 23:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

275817 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275817 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-12 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.155395940E09 +++$+++ The new InfoBox looks good. Hardcoding image sizes seem a very good idea to me to promote uniformity. As for the version numbers, its good to mandate a cite. It has been a problem area for long. But, having the extra \"info\" link for the cite seems a bit out-of-place to me. May be integrate it into the title \"Release information\". --'' +++$+++ The new InfoBox looks good. Hardcoding image sizes seem a very good idea to me to promote uniformity. As for the version numbers, its good to mandate a cite. It has been a problem area for long. But, having the extra "info" link for the cite seems a bit out-of-place to me. May be integrate it into the title "Release information". --''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">soum</font>]]''<sup>সৌমো</sup>''[[User Talk:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">yasch</font>]]'' 08:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
275818 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275817 +++$+++ 275817 +++$+++ 2006-08-14 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.155562020E09 +++$+++ Hey, I managed to totally miss this message until now!  I'm doing well here, all settled in from the move and now I'm just busy with work and getting out and enjoying the lovely summer we've been having here.  The 'info' thing is a bit of a stumper for me... there's got to be a better way we can integrate that kind of stuff.  Hmmmm... <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :Hey, I managed to totally miss this message until now!  I'm doing well here, all settled in from the move and now I'm just busy with work and getting out and enjoying the lovely summer we've been having here.  The 'info' thing is a bit of a stumper for me... there's got to be a better way we can integrate that kind of stuff.  Hmmmm... <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 06:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

275819 +++$+++ Peter Campbell +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-18 10:26:00 +++$+++ 1.155921960E09 +++$+++ With your edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Windows_Vista&diff=70394858&oldid=70394740] why do you think that \"removing patches information. we're an encyclopedia, not a bug tracker, and it's completely irrelevant information for most readers.\"?  Security is THE primary goal for Vista, so security updates are of significant interest - enough to make a lead article on CNET news today. I will put this content on the discussion page for consideration and consensus. I really don't think it is appropriate for you to just trash reference content with any discussion.  How about some collaboration? -- +++$+++ With your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Windows_Vista&diff=70394858&oldid=70394740] why do you think that "removing patches information. we're an encyclopedia, not a bug tracker, and it's completely irrelevant information for most readers."?  Security is THE primary goal for Vista, so security updates are of significant interest - enough to make a lead article on CNET news today. I will put this content on the discussion page for consideration and consensus. I really don't think it is appropriate for you to just trash reference content with any discussion.  How about some collaboration? --[[User:Peter Campbell|Peter Campbell]] <small>[[User talk:Peter Campbell|Talk!]]</small> 10:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
275820 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275819 +++$+++ 275819 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.155924060E09 +++$+++ Have a read through [[Wikipedia:Recentism]].  It disucsses this concern in greater detail.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Have a read through [[Wikipedia:Recentism]].  It disucsses this concern in greater detail.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 11:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

13676 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312428960E09 +++$+++ I hope this has given us a clear starting point from which the article can be developed? I appreciate this has been a frustrating time for you so far, but I hope that we can address these issues and get the article into a better and more detailed state.  +++$+++ I hope this has given us a clear starting point from which the article can be developed? I appreciate this has been a frustrating time for you so far, but I hope that we can address these issues and get the article into a better and more detailed state. [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid#top|talk]]) 20:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
13677 +++$+++ Demiurge1000 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13676 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.312427220E09 +++$+++ I've removed a small amount of material from that section that was sourced only to blogs. -- +++$+++ ::I've removed a small amount of material from that section that was sourced only to blogs. --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 20:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

537965 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-16 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.216271640E09 +++$+++ c) undoubtedly the most important one, he obviously knows me very well and has the very same tenacity to, for no apparent reason, harass me by personally created single-purpose accounts with the sole desire to bug me ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Hambla Hambla], luckily though, it was indef blocked after checkuser). -- +++$+++ c) undoubtedly the most important one, he obviously knows me very well and has the very same tenacity to, for no apparent reason, harass me by personally created single-purpose accounts with the sole desire to bug me ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Hambla Hambla], luckily though, it was indef blocked after checkuser). --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] ([[User talk:PaxEquilibrium|talk]]) 22:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
537966 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537965 +++$+++ 537965 +++$+++ 2008-07-16 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.216273500E09 +++$+++ Hi Pax, I'm happy to hear from you, but I'm sorry to tell you that I'm going to turn your request :-( I'm really sorry, but I'm utterly fed up with Balkan disputes; also, for similar reasons (I've grown up tired up of disputes) I rarely take up anymore admin duties. But I can at least tell you to whom, in my opinion, you should ask: try [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise]], probably the most active admin in the area, and possibly also the ablest, and did a great work in detecting [[User:Deucalionite]]'s sock. Also you could consider asking [[User:Akhilleus]], another user who is good in detecting socks and suspicious editing patterns. Sorry again, and ciao.-- +++$+++ :Hi Pax, I'm happy to hear from you, but I'm sorry to tell you that I'm going to turn your request :-( I'm really sorry, but I'm utterly fed up with Balkan disputes; also, for similar reasons (I've grown up tired up of disputes) I rarely take up anymore admin duties. But I can at least tell you to whom, in my opinion, you should ask: try [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise]], probably the most active admin in the area, and possibly also the ablest, and did a great work in detecting [[User:Deucalionite]]'s sock. Also you could consider asking [[User:Akhilleus]], another user who is good in detecting socks and suspicious editing patterns. Sorry again, and ciao.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] ([[User talk:Aldux#top|talk]]) 22:45, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
537967 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537965 +++$+++ 537966 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.216346760E09 +++$+++ Aldux, I am sorry to bother you again, but see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3APaxEquilibrium&diff=226295285&oldid=226278437 this]. I am in desperate need of an advice, '''any''' advice. What are remaining possible options to be taken against AP? -- +++$+++ ::Aldux, I am sorry to bother you again, but see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APaxEquilibrium&diff=226295285&oldid=226278437 this]. I am in desperate need of an advice, '''any''' advice. What are remaining possible options to be taken against AP? --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] ([[User talk:PaxEquilibrium|talk]]) 19:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
537968 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537965 +++$+++ 537967 +++$+++ 2008-07-17 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.216352520E09 +++$+++ Khoikhoi has already taken a good decision by semi-protecting your talk page; if he passes to vandalising your user page, tell me I'll semi-protect that too. There's not really much advice I can give you, sadly: i----s like Afrika paprika simply don't know when to give up, so I'm afraid he'll continue: but when you see him around, just tell it to an admin, who'll provide to block him. Also keep an eye on his favourite articles: if he tries to edit them through anon IPs, the article can be semi-protected with the specific anti-sock template. I know it's not much, but there's really little else to do. If it gets really bad, I'm ready to help, but keep in mind I'm not a very regular editor.-- +++$+++ :::Khoikhoi has already taken a good decision by semi-protecting your talk page; if he passes to vandalising your user page, tell me I'll semi-protect that too. There's not really much advice I can give you, sadly: i----s like Afrika paprika simply don't know when to give up, so I'm afraid he'll continue: but when you see him around, just tell it to an admin, who'll provide to block him. Also keep an eye on his favourite articles: if he tries to edit them through anon IPs, the article can be semi-protected with the specific anti-sock template. I know it's not much, but there's really little else to do. If it gets really bad, I'm ready to help, but keep in mind I'm not a very regular editor.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] ([[User talk:Aldux#top|talk]]) 20:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

13679 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.312508040E09 +++$+++ I suggest that further discussion abou the article content is continued on the article talk pages from now on - if you do not object I can copy the last few parts of this over and add it to the material already there?  +++$+++ I suggest that further discussion abou the article content is continued on the article talk pages from now on - if you do not object I can copy the last few parts of this over and add it to the material already there? [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid#top|talk]]) 18:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
13680 +++$+++ The Utahraptor +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13679 +++$+++ 13679 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.312432440E09 +++$+++ I have come up with a way to reduce the backlog on the Guild's [[WP:GOCE\/REQ|Requests page]]. Each of the Guild's coordinators will copy edit one article per day for however long it takes to completely reduce the backlog. We should start with the oldest requests first, then work our way to the more recent requests. As it has happened before, there are probably several users who requested a copy edit of an article in July that are dissatisfied because their request hasn't been taken care of yet. Also, to prevent this from ever happening again, I think at least one of our coordinators and several volunteers should keep a constant eye on the Requests page in between Backlog elimination drives. What do you think?  +++$+++ :I have come up with a way to reduce the backlog on the Guild's [[WP:GOCE/REQ|Requests page]]. Each of the Guild's coordinators will copy edit one article per day for however long it takes to completely reduce the backlog. We should start with the oldest requests first, then work our way to the more recent requests. As it has happened before, there are probably several users who requested a copy edit of an article in July that are dissatisfied because their request hasn't been taken care of yet. Also, to prevent this from ever happening again, I think at least one of our coordinators and several volunteers should keep a constant eye on the Requests page in between Backlog elimination drives. What do you think? [[User:The Utahraptor|<font color="green">The Utahraptor</font>]][[User talk:The Utahraptor|<sup>Talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/The Utahraptor|<sub>Contribs</sub>]] 21:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
13681 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13679 +++$+++ 13680 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312435200E09 +++$+++ Did you also notice my update to the little research item on the [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors\/Newsletters\/August_2011#Figures|newsletter talk page]]? Maybe I should move it to the coordinators page...  +++$+++ ::Did you also notice my update to the little research item on the [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Newsletters/August_2011#Figures|newsletter talk page]]? Maybe I should move it to the coordinators page... [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid#top|talk]]) 22:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

395496 +++$+++ FairuseBot +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ 395496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-05 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.236304740E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. -- +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. --[[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]] ([[User talk:FairuseBot|talk]]) 17:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
395497 +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ Grendelkhan +++$+++ 395496 +++$+++ 395496 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.236385080E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ :Done. [[User:Grendelkhan|grendel]]|[[User_talk:Grendelkhan|khan]] 16:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

13682 +++$+++ 86.160.202.216 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.312516320E09 +++$+++ Anyway could you re-word it or something if you think its copied? because all the information is up to date and real information. But i believe i have removed or changed the way its structured, but if you still think it needs changing, could you please change it instead of removing it all? [[Special:Contributions\/86.160.202.216|86.160.202.216]] ( +++$+++ Anyway could you re-word it or something if you think its copied? because all the information is up to date and real information. But i believe i have removed or changed the way its structured, but if you still think it needs changing, could you please change it instead of removing it all? [[Special:Contributions/86.160.202.216|86.160.202.216]] ([[User talk:86.160.202.216|talk]]) 20:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
13683 +++$+++ 86.160.202.216 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13682 +++$+++ 13682 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.312516740E09 +++$+++ why not re-word it yourself? Instead of removing the whole paragraph, and what stuff is copied, could you please expand on this [[Special:Contributions\/86.160.202.216|86.160.202.216]] ( +++$+++ :why not re-word it yourself? Instead of removing the whole paragraph, and what stuff is copied, could you please expand on this [[Special:Contributions/86.160.202.216|86.160.202.216]] ([[User talk:86.160.202.216|talk]]) 20:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
13684 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ 13682 +++$+++ 13683 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.312517040E09 +++$+++ Because copyright violations have to be removed, or a copyvio notice placed on the page. unfortunately the onus is upon the editor making the changes to ensure that the material is not a copyvio. If you were not the person that first posted it, you are still the person that is re-introducing it.  +++$+++ ::Because copyright violations have to be removed, or a copyvio notice placed on the page. unfortunately the onus is upon the editor making the changes to ensure that the material is not a copyvio. If you were not the person that first posted it, you are still the person that is re-introducing it. [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid#top|talk]]) 21:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

275828 +++$+++ Ww +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-10 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.157936760E09 +++$+++ W, Good choice of initial. You have not replied to my response to your note regarding these examples. I'll go ahead and restore to the status quo ante if there is no response from you or others. OK?  +++$+++ W, Good choice of initial. You have not replied to my response to your note regarding these examples. I'll go ahead and restore to the status quo ante if there is no response from you or others. OK? [[User:Ww|ww]] 18:06, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
275829 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 2006-09-10 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.157940720E09 +++$+++ Hey, ww, I completely missed your message about tha examples section last week... sorry about that!  Do what you feel is best, and we'll see how it goes from there.  You know me, I'll point to [[WP:NOT]] and [[WP:EL]] as good guidelines to follow as often as we possibly can, but your justification on the talk page has a lot of sense to it, too, and so if nothing else, more time is probably needed to find the right approach. Thanks for the reminder about this.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :Hey, ww, I completely missed your message about tha examples section last week... sorry about that!  Do what you feel is best, and we'll see how it goes from there.  You know me, I'll point to [[WP:NOT]] and [[WP:EL]] as good guidelines to follow as often as we possibly can, but your justification on the talk page has a lot of sense to it, too, and so if nothing else, more time is probably needed to find the right approach. Thanks for the reminder about this.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 19:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
275830 +++$+++ Ruthfulbarbarity +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 2006-09-13 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.158132900E09 +++$+++ Is there any way he can be temporarily blocked from editing that article?  +++$+++ :Is there any way he can be temporarily blocked from editing that article? [[User:Ruthfulbarbarity|Ruthfulbarbarity]] 00:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
275831 +++$+++ Ruthfulbarbarity +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 2006-09-14 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.158224340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your assistance. It's much-appreciated.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your assistance. It's much-appreciated. [[User:Ruthfulbarbarity|Ruthfulbarbarity]] 01:59, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
275832 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 2006-09-14 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.158244500E09 +++$+++ Nfitz, don't be a dick.  RN doesn't bust his ass improving the encyclopedia to have people like you come around leaving subst'd warnings on his page that are completely irrelevant.  Focus your energy on improving the encyclopedia instead.  Thanks.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :Nfitz, don't be a dick.  RN doesn't bust his ass improving the encyclopedia to have people like you come around leaving subst'd warnings on his page that are completely irrelevant.  Focus your energy on improving the encyclopedia instead.  Thanks.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 07:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
275833 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 275832 +++$+++ 2006-09-14 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.158276000E09 +++$+++ [[User:RN]] removed warnings that were only hours old, and did not provide a link to an archive page.  This also obscures his past history, where he has received other warnings over the years.  I don't see what's wrong with pointing that out in a neutral manner - if an error, he will quickly fix.  I'm also unsure how this justifies you calling me names, and I'll ask you not to continue in that rude manner.  If you don't like my actions, that's fine, say so.  But starting to call people names is most uncivil, and I ask that you apologise and edit your message.  +++$+++ ::[[User:RN]] removed warnings that were only hours old, and did not provide a link to an archive page.  This also obscures his past history, where he has received other warnings over the years.  I don't see what's wrong with pointing that out in a neutral manner - if an error, he will quickly fix.  I'm also unsure how this justifies you calling me names, and I'll ask you not to continue in that rude manner.  If you don't like my actions, that's fine, say so.  But starting to call people names is most uncivil, and I ask that you apologise and edit your message. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] 16:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
275834 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 275833 +++$+++ 2006-09-14 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.158276840E09 +++$+++ Apparently you didn't hear me the first time.  I will repeat:  Don't.  Be.  A.  Dick.  Just don't.  I've reviewed the history of his talk page... '''there were no warnings posted on his talk page'''. RN, like the rest of us, is welcome to refactor any time he likes, in any fashion he pleases.  Your personal displeasure at having your pet redirect [[Microshit]] being nominated by him for deletion doesn't give you ''any'' leeway to leave warnings on his talk page about removal of other warnings that weren't there in the first place.  It's rude, it doesn't benefit the encyclopedia, and I recommend you stop harassing RN (who used to be an administrator, by the way, so he knows plenty about what's allowed) and find something else to work on. Don't even bother replying to this -- it's a waste of your time.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :::Apparently you didn't hear me the first time.  I will repeat:  Don't.  Be.  A.  Dick.  Just don't.  I've reviewed the history of his talk page... '''there were no warnings posted on his talk page'''. RN, like the rest of us, is welcome to refactor any time he likes, in any fashion he pleases.  Your personal displeasure at having your pet redirect [[Microshit]] being nominated by him for deletion doesn't give you ''any'' leeway to leave warnings on his talk page about removal of other warnings that weren't there in the first place.  It's rude, it doesn't benefit the encyclopedia, and I recommend you stop harassing RN (who used to be an administrator, by the way, so he knows plenty about what's allowed) and find something else to work on. Don't even bother replying to this -- it's a waste of your time.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 16:34, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
275835 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 275834 +++$+++ 2006-09-14 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.158279180E09 +++$+++ I'm also going to warn you not to make personal attacks.  You have again called me a dick; this is rude and should not be happening. Please see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocks]] for disruption. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:No personal attacks (npa2) -->  +++$+++ ::::I'm also going to warn you not to make personal attacks.  You have again called me a dick; this is rude and should not be happening. Please see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocks]] for disruption. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:No personal attacks (npa2) --> [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] 17:13, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
275836 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 275835 +++$+++ 2006-09-15 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.158326460E09 +++$+++ Oh, big effing wah.  Don't lower the quality of the encyclopedia by making childish, POV-laden redirects like [[Microshit]] if you are hoping for some respect.  Further, don't get into asinine arguments and start flinging threats at experienced editors who have a lot more insight to the subject than you do.  And knock it off with the dishonesty while you're at it, would you?  You're quoting an event that happened nine months ago, which has precisely zero relevance now.  Surely you agree with that. In fact, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:RN&oldid=75405488 there were no warnings on his pre-blanked talk page]. Most people are dropping by for regular conversations as part of article development work....  except for you and your accusations and threats, of course, and the only reason you're doing ''that'' is because you've got your back up because Ryan RfD'd an article you created.  Finally, I'm not going to be blocked for telling you \"[[meta:Don't be a dick|Don't be a dick]]\" -- it isn't a personal attack, it's a suggestion and a reminder which applies to everyone working on the encyclopedia.  \"You are a dick\", on the other hand, is a personal attack.  There's a difference.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :::::Oh, big effing wah.  Don't lower the quality of the encyclopedia by making childish, POV-laden redirects like [[Microshit]] if you are hoping for some respect.  Further, don't get into asinine arguments and start flinging threats at experienced editors who have a lot more insight to the subject than you do.  And knock it off with the dishonesty while you're at it, would you?  You're quoting an event that happened nine months ago, which has precisely zero relevance now.  Surely you agree with that. In fact, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RN&oldid=75405488 there were no warnings on his pre-blanked talk page]. Most people are dropping by for regular conversations as part of article development work....  except for you and your accusations and threats, of course, and the only reason you're doing ''that'' is because you've got your back up because Ryan RfD'd an article you created.  Finally, I'm not going to be blocked for telling you "[[meta:Don't be a dick|Don't be a dick]]" -- it isn't a personal attack, it's a suggestion and a reminder which applies to everyone working on the encyclopedia.  "You are a dick", on the other hand, is a personal attack.  There's a difference.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 06:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
275837 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 275836 +++$+++ 2006-09-16 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.158395820E09 +++$+++ Regardless of what that page says, I find it offensive.  The page comments that \"Telling someone \"Don't be a dick\" is something of a dick-move in itself\" and the talk page notes that \"is specifically meant to be offensive\".  Furthermore, I don't agree that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:RN&oldid=75405488 there were no warnings on his pre-blanked talk page]; I had warned him on the day before he blanked it, about violating [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]].  In addition, there were was the other warnings, posted only 9 months ago; why you discount such a recent issue, I don't know!  I don't for one second consider [[Microshit]] POV-laden; if I did, how would I have created it?  It's simply a word ... not really sure why this disturbs people so much.  +++$+++ ::::::Regardless of what that page says, I find it offensive.  The page comments that "Telling someone "Don't be a dick" is something of a dick-move in itself" and the talk page notes that "is specifically meant to be offensive".  Furthermore, I don't agree that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RN&oldid=75405488 there were no warnings on his pre-blanked talk page]; I had warned him on the day before he blanked it, about violating [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]].  In addition, there were was the other warnings, posted only 9 months ago; why you discount such a recent issue, I don't know!  I don't for one second consider [[Microshit]] POV-laden; if I did, how would I have created it?  It's simply a word ... not really sure why this disturbs people so much. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] 01:37, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
275838 +++$+++ Jeremy.Visser +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 275828 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.158840720E09 +++$+++ Whoa, thanks a lot! I just sent a message on the IP's talk page. I will try and clean the article up, but I suck at writing new content. I'm thinking of adding a corporate sidebar and maybe a table of its products. I was also thinking of a [[Comparison of VMware products]] or something. Get using VMware, it's really great! \u2014 <span class=\"jeremysig\" style=\"padding: 0.2em; border: 1px solid #6AF; background-color: #CEF; color: #000;\"> +++$+++ *Whoa, thanks a lot! I just sent a message on the IP's talk page. I will try and clean the article up, but I suck at writing new content. I'm thinking of adding a corporate sidebar and maybe a table of its products. I was also thinking of a [[Comparison of VMware products]] or something. Get using VMware, it's really great! — <span class="jeremysig" style="padding: 0.2em; border: 1px solid #6AF; background-color: #CEF; color: #000;">[[User:Jeremy.Visser|<span style="color: #38F;">Jeremy</span>]]</span><span class="jeremytalk" style="padding: 0.2em; border: 1px solid #FA6; border-left: none; background-color: #FEC; color: #000;">[[User_talk:Jeremy.Visser|<span style="color: #F83;">Talk</span>]]</span> 05:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

13686 +++$+++ Tyw7 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-04 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.249448460E09 +++$+++ Do you want to help me improve this article? --<font face=\"Georgia\">[[User:Tyw7|''Tyw7'']]<\/font>&nbsp;&nbsp;([[User talk:Tyw7|Talk]]&nbsp;\u2022&nbsp; +++$+++ Do you want to help me improve this article? --<font face="Georgia">[[User:Tyw7|''Tyw7'']]</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;([[User talk:Tyw7|Talk]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User:Tyw7/Contributions|Contributions]]) 22:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
13687 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13686 +++$+++ 13686 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.249448640E09 +++$+++ Sure, I'll do what I can. I'm best at references and digging stuff up, I'll keep my eye on this article. Right this second I'm working on [[British Rail Class 373]], but I'll make my way there quickly enough. Thanks for contacting me :)  +++$+++ : Sure, I'll do what I can. I'm best at references and digging stuff up, I'll keep my eye on this article. Right this second I'm working on [[British Rail Class 373]], but I'll make my way there quickly enough. Thanks for contacting me :) [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 22:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

308116 +++$+++ Mais oui! +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-04 10:16:00 +++$+++ 1.175706960E09 +++$+++ Ta. -- +++$+++ Ta. --[[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] 10:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
308117 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308116 +++$+++ 308116 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.175710680E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Mais. I'm a bit busy just now, but have pushed in a mention of the rather lawless nature of the Border country \u2013 it previously seemed to suggest a nice neat modern border. Lots of cites needed, and the history needs clarified \u2013 good luck with all that, there are others much more expert than myself, ..  +++$+++ :Thanks, Mais. I'm a bit busy just now, but have pushed in a mention of the rather lawless nature of the Border country – it previously seemed to suggest a nice neat modern border. Lots of cites needed, and the history needs clarified – good luck with all that, there are others much more expert than myself, .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 11:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

13690 +++$+++ Andy Dingley +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-16 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.263711480E09 +++$+++ Do you know what a hybrid is, and why these were important? (TSR-2 is the usual poster child for them) I'm disappointed that you've seen fit to remove this important note - as far as I can see, it's not noted anywhere else in the article.  +++$+++ Do you know what a hybrid is, and why these were important? (TSR-2 is the usual poster child for them) I'm disappointed that you've seen fit to remove this important note - as far as I can see, it's not noted anywhere else in the article. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 22:58, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
13691 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13690 +++$+++ 13690 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.263718080E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid I'm not sure what a hybred is, in this context. Is this regarding the first statment of the 'Avionics' section, or the second? If it is about the first, I'm sure we can incorporate it back in under 'General Information' (it has the same ref there already, all it needs is a little more elaboration therefore), but if it regarding the second, I struggled to prove the connection in all my searching, and with the long standing tag there was little point in keeping it alround for another year lingering for editing out\/otherwise resolving. I'll admit I may have been too hasty here then, but I don't think we need a whole Avionics section for two sentences, one of which isn't really very noteworthy or apparently easy to to verify as factually correct.  +++$+++ :I'm afraid I'm not sure what a hybred is, in this context. Is this regarding the first statment of the 'Avionics' section, or the second? If it is about the first, I'm sure we can incorporate it back in under 'General Information' (it has the same ref there already, all it needs is a little more elaboration therefore), but if it regarding the second, I struggled to prove the connection in all my searching, and with the long standing tag there was little point in keeping it alround for another year lingering for editing out/otherwise resolving. I'll admit I may have been too hasty here then, but I don't think we need a whole Avionics section for two sentences, one of which isn't really very noteworthy or apparently easy to to verify as factually correct. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 00:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
13692 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13690 +++$+++ 13691 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.263720000E09 +++$+++ Okay, the desirable section of the content is back under General Information, I've merged it with an existing paragraph on the avionics. Sorry about the distress.  +++$+++ ::Okay, the desirable section of the content is back under General Information, I've merged it with an existing paragraph on the avionics. Sorry about the distress. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 01:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
13693 +++$+++ Andy Dingley +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13690 +++$+++ 13690 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.263761400E09 +++$+++ Sorry, it's a bit unreasonable of me to complain about this being removed, when WP doesn't even have an article (yet) for [[hybrid (electronic construction)]]! (I'll see if I can get a stub together). Before Concorde, there was already a reluctance to add any more avionics to aircraft because system complexity was outstripping reliability. The military could afford maintenance to cover this, but civil operations had become concerned that aircraft were already missing slots due to electronics failures. The solution was to find a technology that was more reliable, especially for extremes of vibration, and that was the hybrid (NB not a hybrid circuit or hybrid coupler, as that's different). These are effectively tiny PCBs, but based on a ceramic substrate technology that allowed numerous of the simpler passive components to be formed in situ and baked into place, without connecting wires. The reduction in connectors meant better reliability, and once the manufacturing technology was established, the price dropped too. Concorde couldn't have flown without them - it would have become too complicated to ever have enough of itself working at one time.  +++$+++ : Sorry, it's a bit unreasonable of me to complain about this being removed, when WP doesn't even have an article (yet) for [[hybrid (electronic construction)]]! (I'll see if I can get a stub together). Before Concorde, there was already a reluctance to add any more avionics to aircraft because system complexity was outstripping reliability. The military could afford maintenance to cover this, but civil operations had become concerned that aircraft were already missing slots due to electronics failures. The solution was to find a technology that was more reliable, especially for extremes of vibration, and that was the hybrid (NB not a hybrid circuit or hybrid coupler, as that's different). These are effectively tiny PCBs, but based on a ceramic substrate technology that allowed numerous of the simpler passive components to be formed in situ and baked into place, without connecting wires. The reduction in connectors meant better reliability, and once the manufacturing technology was established, the price dropped too. Concorde couldn't have flown without them - it would have become too complicated to ever have enough of itself working at one time. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 12:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

13694 +++$+++ MBK004 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13694 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-03 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.265218620E09 +++$+++ I have noticed that you have nominated [[AH-64 Apache]] for GA, but neglected to complete the nomination procedure. To complete the procedure the only thing you need to do is paste this to the article's talk page (this must be done by the nominator only because of how the template substitutes): <nowiki>{{subst:GAN|subtopic=War and military}}<\/nowiki> Good luck with the nomination! -''' +++$+++ I have noticed that you have nominated [[AH-64 Apache]] for GA, but neglected to complete the nomination procedure. To complete the procedure the only thing you need to do is paste this to the article's talk page (this must be done by the nominator only because of how the template substitutes): <nowiki>{{subst:GAN|subtopic=War and military}}</nowiki> Good luck with the nomination! -'''[[User:MBK004|MBK]]'''<sub>[[User talk:MBK004|004]]</sub> 09:37, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
13695 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13694 +++$+++ 13694 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.265233500E09 +++$+++ Ahh, sorry! I shouldn't havemade a mistake like that. I must be getting senile! :) Thanks for prodding me on this, and thanks for the support.  +++$+++ :Ahh, sorry! I shouldn't havemade a mistake like that. I must be getting senile! :) Thanks for prodding me on this, and thanks for the support. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 13:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

275841 +++$+++ 64.126.42.123 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-23 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.159062360E09 +++$+++ Go ahead and block me if it will make you feel better Warrens! I have had enough of your  little encyclopedia anyway. +++$+++ Go ahead and block me if it will make you feel better Warrens! I have had enough of your  little encyclopedia anyway.[[User:64.126.42.123|64.126.42.123]] 18:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
275842 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275841 +++$+++ 275841 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.159320480E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia isn't here for you to advertise your products or services.  Please see our policies on [[Wikipedia:External links]] and [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]].  Thank you.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Wikipedia isn't here for you to advertise your products or services.  Please see our policies on [[Wikipedia:External links]] and [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]].  Thank you.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 18:28, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

13699 +++$+++ SynergyStar +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-21 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.269158880E09 +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|43px|left|WikiThanks]]<!-- {{Template:WikiThanks}}--> Thank you for your support in helping with the [[Boeing 777]] FAR last November.  Regards,  +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|43px|left|WikiThanks]]<!-- {{Template:WikiThanks}}--> Thank you for your support in helping with the [[Boeing 777]] FAR last November.  Regards, [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar|talk]]) 01:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
13700 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13699 +++$+++ 13699 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.269201060E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much. I had almost forgotten about that, thanks for remembering me. :) Hope to see you out there!  +++$+++ :Thank you very much. I had almost forgotten about that, thanks for remembering me. :) Hope to see you out there! [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 12:51, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

220737 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Damac +++$+++ 220737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-20 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.177074300E09 +++$+++ Are you sure about that? It's always said either 7 January (or just January until early 2006), and the anon editor (and his account) introduced the 2 January date yesterday. Check the history, thanks. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Are you sure about that? It's always said either 7 January (or just January until early 2006), and the anon editor (and his account) introduced the 2 January date yesterday. Check the history, thanks. <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#009">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|303]]''</sub></font> 06:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
220738 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Damac +++$+++ 220737 +++$+++ 220737 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.177074780E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/findarticles.com\/p\/articles\/mi_qn4158\/is_19981229\/ai_n14189040 Both wrong] anyway! <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19981229/ai_n14189040 Both wrong] anyway! <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#009">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|303]]''</sub></font> 06:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

13704 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-09 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.273455420E09 +++$+++ Hello Kyteto, I'm Airplaneman. I'll be reviewing [[Concorde]], an article you nominated, for GA status. As it is quite long, it may take a couple days for me to crank out a full review. I look forward to working with you,  +++$+++ Hello Kyteto, I'm Airplaneman. I'll be reviewing [[Concorde]], an article you nominated, for GA status. As it is quite long, it may take a couple days for me to crank out a full review. I look forward to working with you, [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 18:37, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
13705 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ 2010-05-10 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.273533540E09 +++$+++ You have a most appropriate name for the task :P I hope that you enjoy reviewing the Concorde article and the results ofthe involvements I have been making to it over the last five months.  +++$+++ :You have a most appropriate name for the task :P I hope that you enjoy reviewing the Concorde article and the results ofthe involvements I have been making to it over the last five months. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 16:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
13706 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ 13705 +++$+++ 2010-05-13 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.273744140E09 +++$+++ Yes, my name does fit it, I guess :). I have left a comment, and will do more tomorrow. Looking forward to reading it!  +++$+++ ::Yes, my name does fit it, I guess :). I have left a comment, and will do more tomorrow. Looking forward to reading it! [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 02:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
13707 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ 13706 +++$+++ 2010-05-14 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.273822380E09 +++$+++ OK, I've run into a few sourcing issues. I've made it halfway through in about an hour and a half (currently just finished reading up to the \"Operational history\" section). Link to review: [[Talk:Concorde\/GA2]].  +++$+++ :::OK, I've run into a few sourcing issues. I've made it halfway through in about an hour and a half (currently just finished reading up to the "Operational history" section). Link to review: [[Talk:Concorde/GA2]]. [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 00:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
13708 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ 13707 +++$+++ 2010-05-14 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.273898580E09 +++$+++ I would prefer you leaving my comments alone (don't strike them, please) and instead leaving a reply underneath, as you have done with one of them. Striking them makes it look like I have somehow removed the comment or have retracted it, which I haven't. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::::I would prefer you leaving my comments alone (don't strike them, please) and instead leaving a reply underneath, as you have done with one of them. Striking them makes it look like I have somehow removed the comment or have retracted it, which I haven't. Thanks, [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 21:43, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
13709 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-05-14 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.273902060E09 +++$+++ Okay then, I am sorry for that. Some reviewers are okay with the addressed stuff being struck, but as that's a problem I won't do it here. I'll address the discussion now.  +++$+++ ::::::Okay then, I am sorry for that. Some reviewers are okay with the addressed stuff being struck, but as that's a problem I won't do it here. I'll address the discussion now. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 22:41, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
13710 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ 13708 +++$+++ 2010-05-14 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.273901280E09 +++$+++ Also, there is some discussion on whether or not to remove some content in the \"additional comments\" section.  +++$+++ :::::Also, there is some discussion on whether or not to remove some content in the "additional comments" section. [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 22:28, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
13711 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ 13710 +++$+++ 2010-05-14 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.273906140E09 +++$+++ I've responded there. I've also continued to find unsourced statements. I'm stopping at the \"impact\" section for today and will continue tomorrow.  +++$+++ ::::::I've responded there. I've also continued to find unsourced statements. I'm stopping at the "impact" section for today and will continue tomorrow. [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 23:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
13712 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ 13711 +++$+++ 2010-05-15 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.273982820E09 +++$+++ If you can (for the record down the road when others read the review), may you either strike the comments (I am fine with that on second thought but prefer a response) on unsourced content or respond when done? Otherwise, it's hard for me and others to keep track of the progress (I can look in the history now, but in, say, a year, many edits will effectively bury your improvements). Thanks,  +++$+++ :::::::If you can (for the record down the road when others read the review), may you either strike the comments (I am fine with that on second thought but prefer a response) on unsourced content or respond when done? Otherwise, it's hard for me and others to keep track of the progress (I can look in the history now, but in, say, a year, many edits will effectively bury your improvements). Thanks, [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 21:07, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
13713 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ 13712 +++$+++ 2010-05-15 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.273984200E09 +++$+++ I think that much of the improvements I've made will be effectively perminant; I have more than doubled referencing, most of the stuff was from 2006! So it'll never become as bad as what it was, unless the anti-vandalisers all go to sleep. I'll do a better job of noting what I'm up to though, I hadn't really finished so I wasn't going to make a comment until the end of the weekend on my goings on. I'll keep snipping away at the article though, we'll get it into shape.  +++$+++ ::::::::I think that much of the improvements I've made will be effectively perminant; I have more than doubled referencing, most of the stuff was from 2006! So it'll never become as bad as what it was, unless the anti-vandalisers all go to sleep. I'll do a better job of noting what I'm up to though, I hadn't really finished so I wasn't going to make a comment until the end of the weekend on my goings on. I'll keep snipping away at the article though, we'll get it into shape. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 21:30, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
13714 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ 13713 +++$+++ 2010-05-15 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.273984380E09 +++$+++ OK, I've completed the review. It's a great article, and with some fixes, will be GA status :). I'm putting on hold for a week, until May 22, for changes to be made.  +++$+++ :::::::::OK, I've completed the review. It's a great article, and with some fixes, will be GA status :). I'm putting on hold for a week, until May 22, for changes to be made. [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 21:33, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
13715 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13704 +++$+++ 13714 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.274336520E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the delay - there are a few more things to address.  +++$+++ ::::::::::Sorry for the delay - there are a few more things to address. [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 23:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

537995 +++$+++ Joshdboz +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-14 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.237068540E09 +++$+++ Hey Aldux, it's good to see someone new helping out with the [[Timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama]]!  For future reference I'd point you towards the article's [[Talk:Timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama|talk page]] {{emdash}} we had an AfD back in January that brought up some legitimate concerns about becoming a daily-directory and obvious size issues if we included every action of every member of the administration, so you'll see we've made a few attempts at laying out the general level of selectivity and brevity for inclusion in the timeline (basically a focus on Obama, to a lesser extent Biden, and then just major events concerning administration members ie. cabinet nominations, international conferences, etc).   +++$+++ Hey Aldux, it's good to see someone new helping out with the [[Timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama]]!  For future reference I'd point you towards the article's [[Talk:Timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama|talk page]] {{emdash}} we had an AfD back in January that brought up some legitimate concerns about becoming a daily-directory and obvious size issues if we included every action of every member of the administration, so you'll see we've made a few attempts at laying out the general level of selectivity and brevity for inclusion in the timeline (basically a focus on Obama, to a lesser extent Biden, and then just major events concerning administration members ie. cabinet nominations, international conferences, etc).  [[User:Joshdboz|Joshdboz]] ([[User talk:Joshdboz|talk]]) 15:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
537996 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537995 +++$+++ 537995 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.237167360E09 +++$+++ Hi Hoshdboz. The danger you point to is serious: but then, this is the administration of the major economic and military power in the world, and as such it's pretty active, especially in its first months. Many decisions of the greatest importance take place through the secretaries' orders, so it's not always so easy to limit yourself to what the President explicitely does.Ciao, -- +++$+++ :Hi Hoshdboz. The danger you point to is serious: but then, this is the administration of the major economic and military power in the world, and as such it's pretty active, especially in its first months. Many decisions of the greatest importance take place through the secretaries' orders, so it's not always so easy to limit yourself to what the President explicitely does.Ciao, --[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] ([[User talk:Aldux#top|talk]]) 18:36, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

576573 +++$+++ GoodWikian +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-06 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.215404340E09 +++$+++ Mongo, stop attacking me with your comment on Poupon's page (and please withdraw the comment).  Let Lar do his mentoring and if he and the community accepts then I will prove that I am Poupon's socks.  (The truth is that I am not Poupon himself but I am related to Poupon's socks).  I am trying to come out clean but others are throwing roadblocks.  +++$+++ Mongo, stop attacking me with your comment on Poupon's page (and please withdraw the comment).  Let Lar do his mentoring and if he and the community accepts then I will prove that I am Poupon's socks.  (The truth is that I am not Poupon himself but I am related to Poupon's socks).  I am trying to come out clean but others are throwing roadblocks. [[User:GoodWikian|GoodWikian]] ([[User talk:GoodWikian|talk]]) 21:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
576574 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576573 +++$+++ 576573 +++$+++ 2008-07-06 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.215406560E09 +++$+++ Ya, I think that one speaks for itself. This isn't PoT. PoT said no other sock will be used when he needs to speak for himself. Near as I can tell (and as you know from reading the pages yourself) PoT is not seeking mentorship, either. Just peaceful editing far away from policy pages. ++ +++$+++ :Ya, I think that one speaks for itself. This isn't PoT. PoT said no other sock will be used when he needs to speak for himself. Near as I can tell (and as you know from reading the pages yourself) PoT is not seeking mentorship, either. Just peaceful editing far away from policy pages. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 21:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

275855 +++$+++ Jakub Horky +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-30 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.162229580E09 +++$+++ So you think that some presentation from some MS employee (who was charged with preparation of WinHEC presentation), even more that half a year old, is some MORE ACCURATE than real behavior in Windows Vista, which you can see in black and white? Sorry but that doesn't make sense for me. OK, so I removed the citation because it is simply obsolete. But I don't see any logical reason why there should be information which CONTRADICTS with REAL STATE just because of some beta-time presentation. Please at least reply before you do next revert. Thanks.  +++$+++ So you think that some presentation from some MS employee (who was charged with preparation of WinHEC presentation), even more that half a year old, is some MORE ACCURATE than real behavior in Windows Vista, which you can see in black and white? Sorry but that doesn't make sense for me. OK, so I removed the citation because it is simply obsolete. But I don't see any logical reason why there should be information which CONTRADICTS with REAL STATE just because of some beta-time presentation. Please at least reply before you do next revert. Thanks. [[User:Jakub Horky|Jakub Horky]] 09:33, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
275856 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275855 +++$+++ 275855 +++$+++ 2006-10-30 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.162232520E09 +++$+++ Okay?  Now are you going to quit with this little crusade of yours?  It's damaging the quality and informative value of the article, and I'd like very much for you to stop doing that. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Okay?  Now are you going to quit with this little crusade of yours?  It's damaging the quality and informative value of the article, and I'd like very much for you to stop doing that. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 10:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
275857 +++$+++ Jakub Horky +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275855 +++$+++ 275856 +++$+++ 2006-11-04 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.162703400E09 +++$+++ So... I tried to clarify why I re-added my changes third time. Remember that I absolutely want to IMPROVE article quality. Not DAMAGE. Thanks.  +++$+++ :: So... I tried to clarify why I re-added my changes third time. Remember that I absolutely want to IMPROVE article quality. Not DAMAGE. Thanks. [[User:Jakub Horky|Jakub Horky]] 21:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
275858 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275855 +++$+++ 275857 +++$+++ 2006-11-04 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.162703700E09 +++$+++ What you're doing is replacing [[Wikipedia:Attribution|sourced]], accurate, [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and fundamentally correct material, from Microsoft and other [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]], with what is fundamentally '''your opinion'''.  That's called [[Wikipedia:Original research|original research]], and Wikipedia does not allow that.  Okay?  The onus is on you to provide reliable sources for your information.  NO, saying \"use Vista and see for yourself\" is not a reliable source of information.... you have to find someone who can be counted on to provide accurate information to say this for you.  That's how Wikipedia works.  I really don't like having to waste my time reverting your changes because you can't be bothered to follow utterly basic, cornerstone Wikipedia policies on providing sources for your claims!  So quit it.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::: What you're doing is replacing [[Wikipedia:Attribution|sourced]], accurate, [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and fundamentally correct material, from Microsoft and other [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]], with what is fundamentally '''your opinion'''.  That's called [[Wikipedia:Original research|original research]], and Wikipedia does not allow that.  Okay?  The onus is on you to provide reliable sources for your information.  NO, saying "use Vista and see for yourself" is not a reliable source of information.... you have to find someone who can be counted on to provide accurate information to say this for you.  That's how Wikipedia works.  I really don't like having to waste my time reverting your changes because you can't be bothered to follow utterly basic, cornerstone Wikipedia policies on providing sources for your claims!  So quit it.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 21:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
275859 +++$+++ Jakub Horky +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275855 +++$+++ 275858 +++$+++ 2006-11-04 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.162705500E09 +++$+++ Bye Warrens.  +++$+++ :::: Bye Warrens. [[User:Jakub Horky|Jakub Horky]] 21:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

550386 +++$+++ Sirmob +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-07 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.120736940E09 +++$+++ I would ask that you reconsider your vote at [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion\/Michael Lohman]]. You said \"Also had little or no impact outside the immediate locality.\" - I have changed the article and I believe it now demonstrates the impact that took place. Thanks,  +++$+++ I would ask that you reconsider your vote at [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Michael Lohman]]. You said "Also had little or no impact outside the immediate locality." - I have changed the article and I believe it now demonstrates the impact that took place. Thanks, [[User:Sirmob|Sirmob]] 7 July 2005 04:49 (UTC)
550387 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550386 +++$+++ 550386 +++$+++ 2005-07-07 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.120780200E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I've taken a look. But I've decided not to change my vote (for the time being) since locality was not the only grounds for my delete vote. - +++$+++ :Thanks, I've taken a look. But I've decided not to change my vote (for the time being) since locality was not the only grounds for my delete vote. -[[User:Splash|Splash]] 7 July 2005 16:50 (UTC)

538002 +++$+++ Nev1 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 538002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-08 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.241851740E09 +++$+++ In response to the question you asked [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Historic_sites&diff=282791028&oldid=282601620 here], I don't think there is an easy way of searching for them. If there is, I wasted a lot of time while writing [[list of Scheduled Monuments in Greater Manchester]]. I think [[User:Peter I. Vardy]] encountered similar problems when writing [[Scheduled Monuments in Cheshire (pre-1066)]], [[Scheduled Monuments in Cheshire (post-1539)]], and [[Scheduled Monuments in Cheshire (1066\u20131539)]], three gargantuan lists. If you have questions, I'd recommend asking him as I'll be editing infrequently for a while. I know and contacted the local council for help. What I did for the Greater Manchester list was to look at the list maintained by each local authority (although not all of them are available online), and used pastscape as a backup. Pastscape is run by [[English Heritage]] (who decide what is a SM and what isn't) and has 400,000 entries because it doesn't just include SMs but other historic sites and find spots (more information [http:\/\/www.pastscape.org.uk\/FAQ.aspx here]). If you're seeking information on Scheduled Monuments, I'd suggest asking your local archaeology unit, which will probably be attached to a university. I must admit, I am quite envious of the Scottish system which has them all listed. Happy editing,  +++$+++ In response to the question you asked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Historic_sites&diff=282791028&oldid=282601620 here], I don't think there is an easy way of searching for them. If there is, I wasted a lot of time while writing [[list of Scheduled Monuments in Greater Manchester]]. I think [[User:Peter I. Vardy]] encountered similar problems when writing [[Scheduled Monuments in Cheshire (pre-1066)]], [[Scheduled Monuments in Cheshire (post-1539)]], and [[Scheduled Monuments in Cheshire (1066–1539)]], three gargantuan lists. If you have questions, I'd recommend asking him as I'll be editing infrequently for a while. I know and contacted the local council for help. What I did for the Greater Manchester list was to look at the list maintained by each local authority (although not all of them are available online), and used pastscape as a backup. Pastscape is run by [[English Heritage]] (who decide what is a SM and what isn't) and has 400,000 entries because it doesn't just include SMs but other historic sites and find spots (more information [http://www.pastscape.org.uk/FAQ.aspx here]). If you're seeking information on Scheduled Monuments, I'd suggest asking your local archaeology unit, which will probably be attached to a university. I must admit, I am quite envious of the Scottish system which has them all listed. Happy editing, [[User:Nev1|Nev1]] ([[User talk:Nev1|talk]]) 23:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
538003 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 538002 +++$+++ 538002 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.241938800E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for taking your time to awnser. And I was afraid the awnser would be sort of like this, that is that there is no online database like there is for the listed buildings. As for asking my local archeology unit... I'm afraid they wouldn't be of much help, as I live currently in Italy ;-) Anyway, as it's relatively easier to do I'm going to try making Grade I lists for Suffolk and Norfolk, and possibly other East region counties. Thanks again, and ciao.  +++$+++ :Thanks a lot for taking your time to awnser. And I was afraid the awnser would be sort of like this, that is that there is no online database like there is for the listed buildings. As for asking my local archeology unit... I'm afraid they wouldn't be of much help, as I live currently in Italy ;-) Anyway, as it's relatively easier to do I'm going to try making Grade I lists for Suffolk and Norfolk, and possibly other East region counties. Thanks again, and ciao. [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] ([[User talk:Aldux#top|talk]]) 00:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

275860 +++$+++ Gypsydoctor +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-01 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.162422720E09 +++$+++ Why'd you revert my comment on Adobe LiveCycle being a competing product? It's quite useful for someone trying to decide if they want to use InfoPath.  +++$+++ Why'd you revert my comment on Adobe LiveCycle being a competing product? It's quite useful for someone trying to decide if they want to use InfoPath. [[User:Gypsydoctor|Gypsydoctor]] 15:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
275861 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275860 +++$+++ 275860 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.162424580E09 +++$+++ Hello.  It's a slippery slope that should be avoided if at all possible... an article about a product shouldn't contain an analysis or lists of other products that are like it.  You wouldn't expect to find a list of other colours if you went to the article on the colour [[blue]], for example. We can use categories and lists to collate this information; this results in more balanced information being presented to readers.  Thanks.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Hello.  It's a slippery slope that should be avoided if at all possible... an article about a product shouldn't contain an analysis or lists of other products that are like it.  You wouldn't expect to find a list of other colours if you went to the article on the colour [[blue]], for example. We can use categories and lists to collate this information; this results in more balanced information being presented to readers.  Thanks.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 15:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

13718 +++$+++ Mark83 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-28 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.275107880E09 +++$+++ Hi. You [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Panavia_Tornado&curid=168682&diff=364733200&oldid=363905554 removed] a big chunk of text but the edit summary didn't justify it. Could you explain your reasoning? Many thanks  +++$+++ Hi. You [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Panavia_Tornado&curid=168682&diff=364733200&oldid=363905554 removed] a big chunk of text but the edit summary didn't justify it. Could you explain your reasoning? Many thanks [[User:Mark83|Mark83]] ([[User talk:Mark83|talk]]) 21:38, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
13719 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13718 +++$+++ 13718 +++$+++ 2010-05-28 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.275109920E09 +++$+++ I was rearranging many paragraphs to the more appropriate areas. For instance, the German Navy section under the Variants was not justified as that was an operational dividing of the aircraft, not a Variant in itself, and thus was better dealt with by the already existing duplicate in the Operational History. The fact it was a duplicate was reason enough to ditch it. Same goes for the Italian Airforce, there's no need to state their operational record under variants when it is under Operational History, they have no unique variants on the aircraft whatsoever, thus don't need mentioning under Variants, what little technical upgrades can suffice in Operational fine enough. Nearly everything else is entirely there, but moved around, information on the basic design of all Tornados was moved for the leading paragraph of Variants into Design, or Operational History as fitting, information on the Tornado that was more to do with national operational issues was moved to Operational History. Beforehand, the Variants and Operational History sections had become blurred and pretty much intruding into the same territories, this is more destinctive and true to their normal role on most aircraft pages. Ditching the subsections on Italy and Germany's Navy under Variants was rational as they simply had no justification to be under Variants, as they simply weren't variants unique to those fields. No information should have been lost, I only ditched duplication and moved info around.  +++$+++ :I was rearranging many paragraphs to the more appropriate areas. For instance, the German Navy section under the Variants was not justified as that was an operational dividing of the aircraft, not a Variant in itself, and thus was better dealt with by the already existing duplicate in the Operational History. The fact it was a duplicate was reason enough to ditch it. Same goes for the Italian Airforce, there's no need to state their operational record under variants when it is under Operational History, they have no unique variants on the aircraft whatsoever, thus don't need mentioning under Variants, what little technical upgrades can suffice in Operational fine enough. Nearly everything else is entirely there, but moved around, information on the basic design of all Tornados was moved for the leading paragraph of Variants into Design, or Operational History as fitting, information on the Tornado that was more to do with national operational issues was moved to Operational History. Beforehand, the Variants and Operational History sections had become blurred and pretty much intruding into the same territories, this is more destinctive and true to their normal role on most aircraft pages. Ditching the subsections on Italy and Germany's Navy under Variants was rational as they simply had no justification to be under Variants, as they simply weren't variants unique to those fields. No information should have been lost, I only ditched duplication and moved info around. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 22:12, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
13720 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13718 +++$+++ 13719 +++$+++ 2010-06-02 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.275531480E09 +++$+++ This approach is consistant, and doesn't leave a title-less generalisation that fits nowhere hanging around above a series of section on a subtopic. Note that there's no problem when it's a ''Big section'' on its own with no use of smaller subsections, but it seems unusual to have a miscellaneous line by itself with no seeming topic to itself; and although I can't be as helpful as my teachers, I can only conclude that one method is not just more common, but preferrable to the other in properly formatting articles.  +++$+++ ::This approach is consistant, and doesn't leave a title-less generalisation that fits nowhere hanging around above a series of section on a subtopic. Note that there's no problem when it's a ''Big section'' on its own with no use of smaller subsections, but it seems unusual to have a miscellaneous line by itself with no seeming topic to itself; and although I can't be as helpful as my teachers, I can only conclude that one method is not just more common, but preferrable to the other in properly formatting articles. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 19:18, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
13721 +++$+++ Fnlayson +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13718 +++$+++ 13720 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.276041180E09 +++$+++ Also the paragraph largely involves Tornado GR1s and them being upgrading to other variants.  Maybe a brief summary is in order for the RAF variants above that. - +++$+++ ::* Also the paragraph largely involves Tornado GR1s and them being upgrading to other variants.  Maybe a brief summary is in order for the RAF variants above that. -[[User:Fnlayson|Fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 16:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

538008 +++$+++ Ashlux +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538008 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-03 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.149377160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your work on the OU article, it's looking much better now.  Those were just some things that popped into my head that might be better put elsewhere, but that's just my opinion at the moment.  Let me consider those points today and I might change my mind heh.  But seriously, keep up the good work.  -- <b><font color=\"#ff4800\"> +++$+++ Thanks for your work on the OU article, it's looking much better now.  Those were just some things that popped into my head that might be better put elsewhere, but that's just my opinion at the moment.  Let me consider those points today and I might change my mind heh.  But seriously, keep up the good work.  -- <b><font color="#ff4800">[[User:Ashlux|Ash Lux]]</font></b> <sup>(<font color="#000000">[[User talk:Ashlux|talk]]</font> | <font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Ashlux|contribs]]</font>)</sup> 16:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
538009 +++$+++ Ottergoose +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538008 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.149392700E09 +++$+++ Nmajdan - you're doing great work w\/ that article.  I'd be very pleased if it became featured.  I was just up on the roof of Sarkey's the other day - I'll see if I can get back up there and take some pictures.  I'll also try to get some shots of the NWC.  +++$+++ :: Nmajdan - you're doing great work w/ that article.  I'd be very pleased if it became featured.  I was just up on the roof of Sarkey's the other day - I'll see if I can get back up there and take some pictures.  I'll also try to get some shots of the NWC. [[User:Ottergoose|Ottergoose]] 20:45, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
538010 +++$+++ Ottergoose +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538008 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-04 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.149468840E09 +++$+++ Done and done.  I've uploaded several to OU category at [[:Commons:Category:University of Oklahoma|wikimedia commons]], some of which I've placed on appropriate pages in Wikipedia.  I also started a Norman, OK category there.   +++$+++ ::: Done and done.  I've uploaded several to OU category at [[:Commons:Category:University of Oklahoma|wikimedia commons]], some of which I've placed on appropriate pages in Wikipedia.  I also started a Norman, OK category there.  [[User:Ottergoose|Ottergoose]] 17:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
538011 +++$+++ Ashlux +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538008 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.149397560E09 +++$+++ Oh Nmajdan, don't forget.  After you get done with the OU article, there's always the OSU article that needs attention too =) -- <b><font color=\"#ff4800\"> +++$+++ :: Oh Nmajdan, don't forget.  After you get done with the OU article, there's always the OSU article that needs attention too =) -- <b><font color="#ff4800">[[User:Ashlux|Ash Lux]]</font></b> <sup>(<font color="#000000">[[User talk:Ashlux|talk]]</font> | <font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Ashlux|contribs]]</font>)</sup> 22:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
538012 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538008 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.149399360E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... I will definitely help but I don't know nearly much about that campus as I do my own.-- +++$+++ :::Hmmm... I will definitely help but I don't know nearly much about that campus as I do my own.--[[User:Nmajdan|Nmajdan]] 22:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

13722 +++$+++  +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-08 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.278593460E09 +++$+++ Hello Kyteto. I'll be reviewing the above article for GA status at [[Talk:Boeing B-52 Stratofortress\/GA1]]. I'll begin in about a day!  +++$+++ Hello Kyteto. I'll be reviewing the above article for GA status at [[Talk:Boeing B-52 Stratofortress/GA1]]. I'll begin in about a day! [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] <sup>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Airplaneman|<span style="color:gold;size=2">Review?</span>]]</sup> 05:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
13723 +++$+++  +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13722 +++$+++ 13722 +++$+++ 2010-07-14 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.279103400E09 +++$+++ Sorry for taking so long to get started. Know I know not to pick up two GA reviews at once {{=)|}}. I think I have a big block of time Thursday where I will try to complete the review. Thanks for responding to the suggestions quickly!  +++$+++ :Sorry for taking so long to get started. Know I know not to pick up two GA reviews at once {{=)|}}. I think I have a big block of time Thursday where I will try to complete the review. Thanks for responding to the suggestions quickly! [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] <sup>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Airplaneman|<span style="color:gold;size=2">Review?</span>]]</sup> 03:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
13724 +++$+++  +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13722 +++$+++ 13722 +++$+++ 2010-07-14 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.279103460E09 +++$+++ P.S.: I have adopted the practice of striking comments that have been dealt with (first introduced to me by you!) so feel free to do that on the GA review.  +++$+++ :P.S.: I have adopted the practice of striking comments that have been dealt with (first introduced to me by you!) so feel free to do that on the GA review. [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] <sup>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Airplaneman|<span style="color:gold;size=2">Review?</span>]]</sup> 03:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
13725 +++$+++  +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13722 +++$+++ 13724 +++$+++ 2010-07-17 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.279423740E09 +++$+++ OK, I'm directing my full attention to this review now.  +++$+++ ::OK, I'm directing my full attention to this review now. [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] <sup>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Airplaneman|<span style="color:gold;size=2">Review?</span>]]</sup> 20:29, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
13726 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13722 +++$+++ 13725 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.279798080E09 +++$+++ I have completed the review and put it on hold for seven days for some small issues to be addressed.  +++$+++ :::I have completed the review and put it on hold for seven days for some small issues to be addressed. [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 04:28, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

275867 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.163332800E09 +++$+++ Why did you created a copy of [[:Image:Benedelman-spyware-cropped.png]] by uploading [[:Image:Windows ActiveX security warning (malware).png]]? I have copied the text and would like to delete the unlinked to image.--<sub><span style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Why did you created a copy of [[:Image:Benedelman-spyware-cropped.png]] by uploading [[:Image:Windows ActiveX security warning (malware).png]]? I have copied the text and would like to delete the unlinked to image.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|&nbsp;Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&nbsp;]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></sub> 04:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
275868 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275867 +++$+++ 275867 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.163336640E09 +++$+++ Because the other one was protected and featured. I've restored your image, please replace the usage and let me know when I can delete the old one.--<sub><span style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Because the other one was protected and featured. I've restored your image, please replace the usage and let me know when I can delete the old one.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|&nbsp;Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&nbsp;]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></sub> 05:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
275869 +++$+++ Zzyzx11 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275867 +++$+++ 275868 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.163340240E09 +++$+++ \"Image:Benedelman-spyware-cropped.png\" was \"poorly-named\" because it was originally intended as only a ''temporary'' crop of [[:Image:Benedelman-spyware-blogspot-2a.png]] so it would appear more clearly as a thumbnail on the main page, and therefore would have been immediately deleted afterwards. Such images are protected and tagged with [[Template:M-cropped]]. However, because you posted [[:Image:Windows ActiveX security warning (malware).png]] permanently on the [[Spyware]] article, I have put that image on the main page instead and deleted the other one. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::"Image:Benedelman-spyware-cropped.png" was "poorly-named" because it was originally intended as only a ''temporary'' crop of [[:Image:Benedelman-spyware-blogspot-2a.png]] so it would appear more clearly as a thumbnail on the main page, and therefore would have been immediately deleted afterwards. Such images are protected and tagged with [[Template:M-cropped]]. However, because you posted [[:Image:Windows ActiveX security warning (malware).png]] permanently on the [[Spyware]] article, I have put that image on the main page instead and deleted the other one. Thanks. [[User:Zzyzx11|Zzyzx11]] [[User talk:Zzyzx11|(Talk)]] 06:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

538014 +++$+++ Z4ns4tsu +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-15 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.150430160E09 +++$+++ Hey, great work on the template for the U. I've added to the [[Sooner Schooner]] page and put it on there as well. Boomer Sooner!  +++$+++ Hey, great work on the template for the U. I've added to the [[Sooner Schooner]] page and put it on there as well. Boomer Sooner! [[User:Z4ns4tsu|Z4ns4tsu]] 20:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
538015 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538014 +++$+++ 538014 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.150430640E09 +++$+++ I saw that. Thanks for the help. Feel free to join the [[WP:WPOK|Oklahoma WikiProject]]. We need all the help we can get. Do you live in Norman?-- +++$+++ :I saw that. Thanks for the help. Feel free to join the [[WP:WPOK|Oklahoma WikiProject]]. We need all the help we can get. Do you live in Norman?--[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:10px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">talk</font>]] 21:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
538016 +++$+++ Z4ns4tsu +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538014 +++$+++ 538015 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.150430880E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I do right now. I just graduated and will be moving up to OKC in a few months, though.  +++$+++ ::Yeah, I do right now. I just graduated and will be moving up to OKC in a few months, though. [[User:Z4ns4tsu|Z4ns4tsu]] 21:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
538017 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538014 +++$+++ 538016 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.150430940E09 +++$+++ Can you take pictures?-- +++$+++ :::Can you take pictures?--[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:10px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">talk</font>]] 21:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
538018 +++$+++ Z4ns4tsu +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538014 +++$+++ 538017 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.150433520E09 +++$+++ Sure, what do you need and what size?  +++$+++ ::::Sure, what do you need and what size? [[User:Z4ns4tsu|Z4ns4tsu]] 21:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
538019 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538014 +++$+++ 538018 +++$+++ 2006-06-16 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.150449060E09 +++$+++ A bunch of stuff. Not really. Ok, what do we need? Outside of LNC, baseball park, softball park, new soccer complex, better pictures of Bizzell (that one on the OU template's legality is questionable), more pleasing pictures of the campus in full bloom, better pictures of dorms, really anything. There is a page in the commons you can [[:Commons:University of Oklahoma|check out]] and upload to. As far as size goes, the bigger the better. There is no limit at the Commons.-- +++$+++ :::::A bunch of stuff. Not really. Ok, what do we need? Outside of LNC, baseball park, softball park, new soccer complex, better pictures of Bizzell (that one on the OU template's legality is questionable), more pleasing pictures of the campus in full bloom, better pictures of dorms, really anything. There is a page in the commons you can [[:Commons:University of Oklahoma|check out]] and upload to. As far as size goes, the bigger the better. There is no limit at the Commons.--[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 02:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
538020 +++$+++ Z4ns4tsu +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538014 +++$+++ 538019 +++$+++ 2006-06-16 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.150501620E09 +++$+++ Cool, I'll tell my wife. She's an amature photographer and has a bunch of shots of campus already. I'm sure she won't mind the work, either.  +++$+++ ::::::Cool, I'll tell my wife. She's an amature photographer and has a bunch of shots of campus already. I'm sure she won't mind the work, either. [[User:Z4ns4tsu|Z4ns4tsu]] 16:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
538021 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538014 +++$+++ 538020 +++$+++ 2006-06-16 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.150501980E09 +++$+++ Wow, awesome. And like I said, upload whatever you can. Of course no personal pictures, but pictures that show off the architecture of campus as well as its aesthetics, etc. But the more pictures we have, the more options we have for inclusion in future articles. But I do think we need more pictures of the athletic facilities as well as better pictures of some of the older buildings on campus like Evans, Bizzell, Holmberg, Jacobson, Copeland, etc.-- +++$+++ :::::::Wow, awesome. And like I said, upload whatever you can. Of course no personal pictures, but pictures that show off the architecture of campus as well as its aesthetics, etc. But the more pictures we have, the more options we have for inclusion in future articles. But I do think we need more pictures of the athletic facilities as well as better pictures of some of the older buildings on campus like Evans, Bizzell, Holmberg, Jacobson, Copeland, etc.--[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 16:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

13727 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-25 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.280044380E09 +++$+++ It has been passed. Yay!  +++$+++ It has been passed. Yay! [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 00:53, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
13728 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13727 +++$+++ 13727 +++$+++ 2010-07-25 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.280119740E09 +++$+++ This was an enjoyable experience! I hope people make heavy use of the improved article that has come out of the process, I also look forward to working with you on another project some day. Right now, I guess I have to find myself a new article to throw my efforts into, let's see what takes my fancy\/grabs my interest and who knows, another GAN in a month or so? Thank you for reviewing it in depth, its what is needed to make a real difference in the long term.  +++$+++ :This was an enjoyable experience! I hope people make heavy use of the improved article that has come out of the process, I also look forward to working with you on another project some day. Right now, I guess I have to find myself a new article to throw my efforts into, let's see what takes my fancy/grabs my interest and who knows, another GAN in a month or so? Thank you for reviewing it in depth, its what is needed to make a real difference in the long term. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 21:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
13729 +++$+++ Fnlayson +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13727 +++$+++ 13728 +++$+++ 2010-07-26 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.280191980E09 +++$+++ Well done Kyteto, & Airplaneman! - +++$+++ :: Well done Kyteto, & Airplaneman! -[[User:Fnlayson|fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 17:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

275872 +++$+++ PureLegend +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275872 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.163386980E09 +++$+++ About the original research thing, I didn't look at the source, sorry. I just assumed they would call it Windows Six because Vista is Windows 6.0, so Windows 7.0 wouldn't make sense.  +++$+++ About the original research thing, I didn't look at the source, sorry. I just assumed they would call it Windows Six because Vista is Windows 6.0, so Windows 7.0 wouldn't make sense. [[User:PureLegend|PureLegend]] 19:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
275873 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275872 +++$+++ 275872 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.163604900E09 +++$+++ Read this: [[User:Warrens\/butwhy]].  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Read this: [[User:Warrens/butwhy]].  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 07:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

275874 +++$+++ JamesWeb +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275874 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.163636580E09 +++$+++ I've dropped you a reply [[User_talk:JamesWeb#Screenshots|here]], and also put forward an idea [[Template_talk:History_of_Windows#How_about_something_like_this...|here]] here, don't know if you'd be notified so now you know!  +++$+++ I've dropped you a reply [[User_talk:JamesWeb#Screenshots|here]], and also put forward an idea [[Template_talk:History_of_Windows#How_about_something_like_this...|here]] here, don't know if you'd be notified so now you know! [[User:JamesWeb|JamesWeb]] 16:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
275875 +++$+++ JamesWeb +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275874 +++$+++ 275874 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.163922720E09 +++$+++ [[Template_talk:History_of_Windows#How_about_something_like_this...|Another idea!]]  +++$+++ :[[Template_talk:History_of_Windows#How_about_something_like_this...|Another idea!]] [[User:JamesWeb|JamesWeb]] 23:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

570267 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-25 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.209110520E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Thanks for being so patient and helpful with my questions about image space templates!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for being so patient and helpful with my questions about image space templates! [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 01:02, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
570268 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570267 +++$+++ 570267 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.209111120E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 01:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

275877 +++$+++ Jiddisch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275877 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.163910360E09 +++$+++ by [[Windows Vista]] article. I put it back.  +++$+++ by [[Windows Vista]] article. I put it back. [[User:Jiddisch|Jiddisch]] 20:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
275878 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275877 +++$+++ 275877 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163912760E09 +++$+++ Oops, sorry about that!  I didn't see your edit come through.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Oops, sorry about that!  I didn't see your edit come through.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 21:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

538022 +++$+++ Bobblewik +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-17 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.150575900E09 +++$+++ The article still has two solitary links to the 1890 article. I just thought that I would let you know in case you want to run the tool again. Feel free to use it on other article categories of interest to you. Keep up the good work. Regards  +++$+++ The article still has two solitary links to the 1890 article. I just thought that I would let you know in case you want to run the tool again. Feel free to use it on other article categories of interest to you. Keep up the good work. Regards [[User:Bobblewik|bobblewik]] 13:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
538023 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538022 +++$+++ 538022 +++$+++ 2006-06-17 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.150578240E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks. I removed one of them. But that year is significant to the article.-- +++$+++ :Ok, thanks. I removed one of them. But that year is significant to the article.--[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 14:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
538024 +++$+++ Bobblewik +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538022 +++$+++ 538023 +++$+++ 2006-06-17 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.150581420E09 +++$+++ OK. Thanks. Feel free to run it on other articles. Keep up the good work.  +++$+++ ::OK. Thanks. Feel free to run it on other articles. Keep up the good work. [[User:Bobblewik|bobblewik]] 14:57, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
538025 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538022 +++$+++ 538022 +++$+++ 2006-06-23 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.151107500E09 +++$+++ Great work - thanks for creating this and letting me know about it.  I did post one small problem [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ACollege_coach_infobox&diff=60197541&oldid=60048221 here]. Best,  +++$+++ *Great work - thanks for creating this and letting me know about it.  I did post one small problem [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ACollege_coach_infobox&diff=60197541&oldid=60048221 here]. Best, [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 17:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

393264 +++$+++ JoshuaZ +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-21 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.164111840E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FMacGregor_State_High_School&diff=89137727&oldid=89129307], simply dismissing arguments as \"bullshit\" is both uncivil and counterproductive. Comments like that are why the current school AfD situation is so toxic. Please don't do that.  +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FMacGregor_State_High_School&diff=89137727&oldid=89129307], simply dismissing arguments as "bullshit" is both uncivil and counterproductive. Comments like that are why the current school AfD situation is so toxic. Please don't do that. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 04:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
393265 +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393264 +++$+++ 393264 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.164277440E09 +++$+++ I didn't simply dismiss it as bullshit, I explained why that's what it is.  +++$+++ :I didn't simply dismiss it as bullshit, I explained why that's what it is. [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 02:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
393266 +++$+++ Unfocused +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393264 +++$+++ 393265 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.164301980E09 +++$+++ JoshuaZ, weren't you arguing to me recently that AfD ''wasn't'' toxic? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Schools&diff=prev&oldid=87806244  Here?]  I'm completely cool with it if you've changed your mind, it would indicate perhaps you're feeling empathy with the editors whose good faith efforts are being removed.   +++$+++ ::JoshuaZ, weren't you arguing to me recently that AfD ''wasn't'' toxic? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Schools&diff=prev&oldid=87806244  Here?]  I'm completely cool with it if you've changed your mind, it would indicate perhaps you're feeling empathy with the editors whose good faith efforts are being removed.  [[User:Unfocused|<FONT COLOR="#66CCFF">Un</FONT>]][[User talk:Unfocused|<FONT COLOR="#0000CC">focused</FONT>]] 09:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

538026 +++$+++  +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538026 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-27 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.151473740E09 +++$+++ Hey, this is [[User:ProfessorPaul]]; I live in [[Oklahoma]] and I am also signed onto the Wikipedia Oklahoma project.  May I enquire where you got the user box that you have 2 [[academic]] degrees?  I have 3 academic degrees, and I just wanted to know if I could get a user box stating that.  Thank you.  :)   +++$+++ Hey, this is [[User:ProfessorPaul]]; I live in [[Oklahoma]] and I am also signed onto the Wikipedia Oklahoma project.  May I enquire where you got the user box that you have 2 [[academic]] degrees?  I have 3 academic degrees, and I just wanted to know if I could get a user box stating that.  Thank you.  :)  [[User:ProfessorPaul]] 22:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
538027 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538026 +++$+++ 538026 +++$+++ 2006-06-28 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.151487420E09 +++$+++ Well, here is the two degree template:{{tl|User degree\/2 degrees}}. I don't see one for 3 degrees, unless you create it.-- +++$+++ :Well, here is the two degree template:{{tl|User degree/2 degrees}}. I don't see one for 3 degrees, unless you create it.--[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 02:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

13740 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13740 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-04 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.283663340E09 +++$+++ Looks like I have a bit of free time this Labor Day weekend, so I've picked up the review :). I should have comments in by the end of tomorrow. Best,  +++$+++ Looks like I have a bit of free time this Labor Day weekend, so I've picked up the review :). I should have comments in by the end of tomorrow. Best, [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 22:09, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
13741 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13740 +++$+++ 13740 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.283926560E09 +++$+++ Sorry for not completing it as planned; Thursday is the next time I have a good amount of time. I hope to add more comments then,  +++$+++ :Sorry for not completing it as planned; Thursday is the next time I have a good amount of time. I hope to add more comments then, [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 23:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
13742 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13740 +++$+++ 13741 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.283927820E09 +++$+++ There's no pressure, no rush. :) I work hard on weekdays, so I do most of my work here on weekends. I look forward to working on the article together, something good always comes out of these review efforts. Thanks for taking a look at this.  +++$+++ ::There's no pressure, no rush. :) I work hard on weekdays, so I do most of my work here on weekends. I look forward to working on the article together, something good always comes out of these review efforts. Thanks for taking a look at this. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 23:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
13743 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13740 +++$+++ 13742 +++$+++ 2010-09-09 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.284078480E09 +++$+++ Alright, now I (most likely) have some variant of [[influenza]], with the fever, body soreness, and all that good stuff. I don't feel like editing right now. Next good slot of time: this weekend :).  +++$+++ :::Alright, now I (most likely) have some variant of [[influenza]], with the fever, body soreness, and all that good stuff. I don't feel like editing right now. Next good slot of time: this weekend :). [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 17:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
13744 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13740 +++$+++ 13743 +++$+++ 2010-09-11 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.284229020E09 +++$+++ Health always come first :) Get better soon, the review can wait until your recovery.  +++$+++ ::::Health always come first :) Get better soon, the review can wait until your recovery. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 11:17, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
13745 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13740 +++$+++ 13744 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.285136640E09 +++$+++ Thanks; I'm feeling better :). Comments are slowly appearing\u2026  +++$+++ :::::Thanks; I'm feeling better :). Comments are slowly appearing… [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 23:24, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

275887 +++$+++ FrummerThanThou +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-08 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.165585440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments and your last words of advice. I ought to confide in you that usually when I slap a tag on an article I know the metapidians there will be alarmed, but in my view lead paragraphs are getting out of control here on the whole. Very often I don't know enough about the subject to wikify it and am simply prodding the bear out of hibernation kind of thing, not vilifying it. Some editors see no problem with their long intros like you with microsoft, which is OK in this case, but I would say '''most''' long intros are not, conformity to WP:LEAD is ignored totally. In fact the WP:LEAD page has very little participance for a guideline page. I encourege you to join our new wikiproject [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council\/Proposals#Lead_Paragraph_Cleanups] to keep keep an eye on us, we will make mistakes too. Thanks again.  +++$+++ Thanks for your comments and your last words of advice. I ought to confide in you that usually when I slap a tag on an article I know the metapidians there will be alarmed, but in my view lead paragraphs are getting out of control here on the whole. Very often I don't know enough about the subject to wikify it and am simply prodding the bear out of hibernation kind of thing, not vilifying it. Some editors see no problem with their long intros like you with microsoft, which is OK in this case, but I would say '''most''' long intros are not, conformity to WP:LEAD is ignored totally. In fact the WP:LEAD page has very little participance for a guideline page. I encourege you to join our new wikiproject [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Lead_Paragraph_Cleanups] to keep keep an eye on us, we will make mistakes too. Thanks again. [[User:FrummerThanThou|FrummerThanThou]] 05:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
275888 +++$+++ Yamla +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275887 +++$+++ 275887 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.165814940E09 +++$+++ When I removed the image from that page, there was ''not'' a detailed fair-use rationale for the image's use on [[:History of Microsoft Windows]].  This may be the case now, I have not checked.  -- +++$+++ :When I removed the image from that page, there was ''not'' a detailed fair-use rationale for the image's use on [[:History of Microsoft Windows]].  This may be the case now, I have not checked.  --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] 21:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

13746 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-17 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.287315660E09 +++$+++ I have completed the review; sorry for keeping you waiting!  +++$+++ I have completed the review; sorry for keeping you waiting! [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 04:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
13747 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13746 +++$+++ 13746 +++$+++ 2010-10-17 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.287367620E09 +++$+++ Passed! Good work,  +++$+++ :Passed! Good work, [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 19:07, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
13748 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13746 +++$+++ 13747 +++$+++ 2010-10-18 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.287453060E09 +++$+++ Hurrah! Another aviation milestone passed, one of the most important and memorable delta-wings has been vastly improved. Thank you for you thoroughness; now to look for a new project to undertake!  +++$+++ ::Hurrah! Another aviation milestone passed, one of the most important and memorable delta-wings has been vastly improved. Thank you for you thoroughness; now to look for a new project to undertake! [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 18:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

275891 +++$+++ Walter_Humala +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275891 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-29 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.167399060E09 +++$+++ I didn't get banned. By the way if you believed that, well you ought to have delete all my subpages as well. -- [[user:Walter_Humala|Walt]]'''<font color\"green\">[[user:Walter_Humala\/Esperanza|e]]<\/font>''' +++$+++ I didn't get banned. By the way if you believed that, well you ought to have delete all my subpages as well. -- [[user:Walter_Humala|Walt]]'''<font color"green">[[user:Walter_Humala/Esperanza|e]]</font>'''[[user:Walter_Humala|r Humala - Emperor of West Wikipedia]][[Image:Crystal_Clear_app_korganizer.png|20px]][[user_talk:Walter_Humala|<font color="#00AA88">wanna Talk?</font>]] 05:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
275892 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275891 +++$+++ 275891 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.167400740E09 +++$+++ Putting fair-use images on user-space articles is specifically disallowed by Wikipedia policy.  Also, your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Walter_Humala block history] shows that you were blocked indefinitely at the time of my deleting those pages. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Putting fair-use images on user-space articles is specifically disallowed by Wikipedia policy.  Also, your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Walter_Humala block history] shows that you were blocked indefinitely at the time of my deleting those pages. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 05:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

13749 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-13 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.284421620E09 +++$+++ {{#if:|[[User:{{{2}}}]] has|I have}} nominated [[Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/{{#if:Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress\/archive1|Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress\/archive1|Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress\/archive{{#if:||1}}}}|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare \"Keep\" or \"Delist\" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]].  +++$+++ {{#if:|[[User:{{{2}}}]] has|I have}} nominated [[Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/{{#if:Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress/archive1|Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress/archive1|Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress/archive{{#if:||1}}}}|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]]. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer|talk]]) 16:47, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
13750 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13749 +++$+++ 13749 +++$+++ 2010-09-13 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.284423300E09 +++$+++ Excellent. It truely needed this review, even after the cleanup I undertook it was still in a great mess.  +++$+++ :Excellent. It truely needed this review, even after the cleanup I undertook it was still in a great mess. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 17:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

275894 +++$+++ FrummerThanThou +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-03 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.167868500E09 +++$+++ Hi, '''WP:LEAD''' is a WP policy, please see the template on the [[WP:LEAD]] page, stating '''This page is part of the Manual of Style, and is considered a [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|guideline]] for Wikipedia.''' Cheers.  +++$+++ Hi, '''WP:LEAD''' is a WP policy, please see the template on the [[WP:LEAD]] page, stating '''This page is part of the Manual of Style, and is considered a [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|guideline]] for Wikipedia.''' Cheers. [[User:FrummerThanThou|frummer]] 15:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
275895 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275894 +++$+++ 275894 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.167877380E09 +++$+++ Guidelines aren't policies.  If you're not clear about the difference, read [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines]], and have a look at [[Wikipedia:List of policies]] and you'll notice that nothing about lead sections, or indeed any part of the manual of style, is listed as official Wikipedia policy.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Guidelines aren't policies.  If you're not clear about the difference, read [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines]], and have a look at [[Wikipedia:List of policies]] and you'll notice that nothing about lead sections, or indeed any part of the manual of style, is listed as official Wikipedia policy.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 18:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
275896 +++$+++ FrummerThanThou +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275894 +++$+++ 275895 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.167886560E09 +++$+++ You're right, I've rephrased the message. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::You're right, I've rephrased the message. Cheers. [[User:FrummerThanThou|frummer]] 20:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

13752 +++$+++ AirplanePro +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13752 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-05 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.286263920E09 +++$+++ The article [[Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow]] for eventual comments about the article. Well done! [[User:WikiCopter|WikiCopter]] ([[User talk:WikiCopter|radio]] &bull;  [[Special:Contributions\/WikiCopter|sorties]] &bull;  [[commons:User:WikiCopter|images]] &bull;   +++$+++ The article [[Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow]] for eventual comments about the article. Well done! [[User:WikiCopter|WikiCopter]] ([[User talk:WikiCopter|radio]] &bull;  [[Special:Contributions/WikiCopter|sorties]] &bull;  [[commons:User:WikiCopter|images]] &bull;  [[User:AirplanePro|shot down]]) 00:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
13753 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13752 +++$+++ 13752 +++$+++ 2010-08-28 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.283043300E09 +++$+++ I remember a similar experience, when Concorde was auto-failed for having too many flaws in the reviewer's eyes to be fixed within seven days, in spite of the fact I fixed them all and took the message to heart in my editing sweeps of the page within three days. Naturally, it did gets its GA one month later. But I do see the process sometimes as pointless, unless you get a talkative and intensive reviewer, who really tells you what is right and wrong in long prose and discussions, like there was on the B-1 Lancer for instance, then it isn't as good, because real benifits come from real engagement and involvement, the reviewer should become involved in the article and be interested by it. A long post, but I'm glad the poor experience you've had wasn't at my hands, I am not a well behaved editor at times, but I do reflect and regret things when I get them wrong, leaving someone else disheartened is very harsh, not the type of intensity I want to be emitting and spreading at all. Thanks for talking about it with me.  +++$+++ :I remember a similar experience, when Concorde was auto-failed for having too many flaws in the reviewer's eyes to be fixed within seven days, in spite of the fact I fixed them all and took the message to heart in my editing sweeps of the page within three days. Naturally, it did gets its GA one month later. But I do see the process sometimes as pointless, unless you get a talkative and intensive reviewer, who really tells you what is right and wrong in long prose and discussions, like there was on the B-1 Lancer for instance, then it isn't as good, because real benifits come from real engagement and involvement, the reviewer should become involved in the article and be interested by it. A long post, but I'm glad the poor experience you've had wasn't at my hands, I am not a well behaved editor at times, but I do reflect and regret things when I get them wrong, leaving someone else disheartened is very harsh, not the type of intensity I want to be emitting and spreading at all. Thanks for talking about it with me. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 17:55, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
13754 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-29 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.283134080E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry to hear the style of the article's citation is disagreed upon. What I was doing was keeping the references written consistantly, in this case consistantly wrong, and I have done some twaeking and a little bit of reading, it doesn't appear to be excessively out of line as the standard information sought in citations is included. Sometimes it is impossible to complete some citations 'properly' as the information simply isn't there, but that isn't the case with most. I'll keep tuning the titles for now, lets see what comes up.  +++$+++ :::I'm sorry to hear the style of the article's citation is disagreed upon. What I was doing was keeping the references written consistantly, in this case consistantly wrong, and I have done some twaeking and a little bit of reading, it doesn't appear to be excessively out of line as the standard information sought in citations is included. Sometimes it is impossible to complete some citations 'properly' as the information simply isn't there, but that isn't the case with most. I'll keep tuning the titles for now, lets see what comes up. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 19:08, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
13755 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-10-19 12:56:00 +++$+++ 1.287518160E09 +++$+++ I tried multiple times to get {Harvnb} to activate and operate, I don't know how. I need to see a working example to understand how to lay out the code, because my trial and error methods are both unproductive and ineffective at generating the result desired. If you wish, you can impliment the coee yourself, that was I can at least see how it works and then help you adopt it across the article.  +++$+++ :::::::::I tried multiple times to get {Harvnb} to activate and operate, I don't know how. I need to see a working example to understand how to lay out the code, because my trial and error methods are both unproductive and ineffective at generating the result desired. If you wish, you can impliment the coee yourself, that was I can at least see how it works and then help you adopt it across the article. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 12:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
13756 +++$+++ Bzuk +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13752 +++$+++ 13752 +++$+++ 2010-10-19 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.287523980E09 +++$+++ BTW, I can rewrite the cite templates into proper formatting, but it takes so much editing that it isn't worth it, so I find that writing in text is the easiest and most efficient solution: simple, identify all the key elements of the reference notation: author, title, publisher, date. FWiW, I really appreciate your efforts to append and revise significant aviation articles and consider myself \"in your corner.\"  +++$+++ :BTW, I can rewrite the cite templates into proper formatting, but it takes so much editing that it isn't worth it, so I find that writing in text is the easiest and most efficient solution: simple, identify all the key elements of the reference notation: author, title, publisher, date. FWiW, I really appreciate your efforts to append and revise significant aviation articles and consider myself "in your corner." [[User:Bzuk|Bzuk]] ([[User talk:Bzuk|talk]]) 14:33, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
13757 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13752 +++$+++ 13752 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.288913760E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your assistance, I don't have the same level of access or availability that you have, living in a rural area does not lend itself to getting formal materials to use. I keep doing my best with the material I have available on the topics that interest me.  +++$+++ :Thank you for your assistance, I don't have the same level of access or availability that you have, living in a rural area does not lend itself to getting formal materials to use. I keep doing my best with the material I have available on the topics that interest me. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 16:36, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
13758 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.288919160E09 +++$+++ I used to go to University in Swansea, in the United Kingdom, but following my graduation over a year ago I spend my time usually in Shropshire, the only county in England without a city if I recall correctly. When I visit Cardiff I sometimes visit their university library to look at what I am interested in. Just last month I took myself to RAF Cosford's museum, where I saw many of the aircraft I've been working on since, the Britannia and the Comet, as well as both of those you just mentioned. The Gnat is in a terrible state, and is quite demotivating to examine, but the Vickers Valiant is a little cleaner to my eye. I've yet to decide on a 'big undertaking' to do after the work on the Comet. Perhaps the Valiant, or the Westland Sea King; I'll think on it and eventually something takes my fancy.  +++$+++ :::I used to go to University in Swansea, in the United Kingdom, but following my graduation over a year ago I spend my time usually in Shropshire, the only county in England without a city if I recall correctly. When I visit Cardiff I sometimes visit their university library to look at what I am interested in. Just last month I took myself to RAF Cosford's museum, where I saw many of the aircraft I've been working on since, the Britannia and the Comet, as well as both of those you just mentioned. The Gnat is in a terrible state, and is quite demotivating to examine, but the Vickers Valiant is a little cleaner to my eye. I've yet to decide on a 'big undertaking' to do after the work on the Comet. Perhaps the Valiant, or the Westland Sea King; I'll think on it and eventually something takes my fancy. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 18:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
13759 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.288932540E09 +++$+++ I'll give the Comet article a good read over tomorrow, and probably nominate it for reviewing, provided I don't see obvious flaws. I'll also look up what material I can use on the Valiant, previously I've found it impossible to do much on some articles because of a lack of material available, I just couldn't do much with the Sea Vixne or the BAC 1-11.  +++$+++ :::::I'll give the Comet article a good read over tomorrow, and probably nominate it for reviewing, provided I don't see obvious flaws. I'll also look up what material I can use on the Valiant, previously I've found it impossible to do much on some articles because of a lack of material available, I just couldn't do much with the Sea Vixne or the BAC 1-11. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 21:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
13760 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13752 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.288941600E09 +++$+++ If you're looking for an area of the Comet article to write more about, it would be nice to have more details on its service after the crashes and redesign, that area is still a little thin in my eyes, thought it'll float as it is.  +++$+++ :::::::If you're looking for an area of the Comet article to write more about, it would be nice to have more details on its service after the crashes and redesign, that area is still a little thin in my eyes, thought it'll float as it is. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 00:20, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

275897 +++$+++ Vanderdecken +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275897 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-07 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.168196940E09 +++$+++ I agree that the contributor has vandalised some articles in the past, and the screenshot is obviously KND related, but it is also a valid demonstration of the UXTHEME.dll patch to change the Windows interface, and it demonstrates how this can be done with a Vista Basic lookalike skin for XP. Until someone else supplies a screenshot of the same thing without the KND reference, it should stay - it's still related. \u2014 +++$+++ I agree that the contributor has vandalised some articles in the past, and the screenshot is obviously KND related, but it is also a valid demonstration of the UXTHEME.dll patch to change the Windows interface, and it demonstrates how this can be done with a Vista Basic lookalike skin for XP. Until someone else supplies a screenshot of the same thing without the KND reference, it should stay - it's still related. —[[User:Vanderdecken|Vanderdecken]]∴ <b>[[User talk:Vanderdecken|∫]][[Special:Emailuser/Vanderdecken|ξ]][[Special:Contributions/Vanderdecken|φ]]</b> 11:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
275898 +++$+++ Vanderdecken +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275897 +++$+++ 275897 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.168198140E09 +++$+++ And you have proof those IP vandals are the same person? Checkuser-type proof? Blimey, a real crusade... \u2014 +++$+++ :And you have proof those IP vandals are the same person? Checkuser-type proof? Blimey, a real crusade... —[[User:Vanderdecken|Vanderdecken]]∴ <b>[[User talk:Vanderdecken|∫]][[Special:Emailuser/Vanderdecken|ξ]][[Special:Contributions/Vanderdecken|φ]]</b> 11:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
275899 +++$+++ Vanderdecken +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275897 +++$+++ 275898 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.168199580E09 +++$+++ I was referring to the term [[Crusades#Etymology and use of the term .22crusade.22|a crusade]] rather than The [[Crusades]]. As in, \"of being a righteous campaign, usually to \"root out evil\", or to fight for a just cause\". I do agree with the sentiment, but I thought the initial action was a bit ruthless. I'll be on my way then. Good luck, soldier! \u2014 +++$+++ ::I was referring to the term [[Crusades#Etymology and use of the term .22crusade.22|a crusade]] rather than The [[Crusades]]. As in, "of being a righteous campaign, usually to "root out evil", or to fight for a just cause". I do agree with the sentiment, but I thought the initial action was a bit ruthless. I'll be on my way then. Good luck, soldier! —[[User:Vanderdecken|Vanderdecken]]∴ <b>[[User talk:Vanderdecken|∫]][[Special:Emailuser/Vanderdecken|ξ]][[Special:Contributions/Vanderdecken|φ]]</b> 11:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

538042 +++$+++ Cliedl +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538042 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-06 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.154925420E09 +++$+++ You seem to be somewhat involved in the College football project, so I thought I would ask you about this. I've been perusing through the [[college athletic conference|conference]] pages and I've noticed a lot of disparity in their structure. I'm trying to put together a uniform template off of which all conference pages can be based. Do you know where I should put this or who I should talk to? Thanks. -- +++$+++ You seem to be somewhat involved in the College football project, so I thought I would ask you about this. I've been perusing through the [[college athletic conference|conference]] pages and I've noticed a lot of disparity in their structure. I'm trying to put together a uniform template off of which all conference pages can be based. Do you know where I should put this or who I should talk to? Thanks. --[[User:Cliedl|Cliedl]] 21:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
538043 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538042 +++$+++ 538042 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.154935020E09 +++$+++ Well, I'd probably open it up for discussion on the [[WP:CFB|college football WikiProject]] ({{tk|Wikipedia:WikiProject College football}}). Once a format has been decided on and agreed to, I'd say the template would go in the Structure section ([[WP:CFB#Structure|here]]). But that is a good idea and look forward to an open discussion regarding it.-- +++$+++ :Well, I'd probably open it up for discussion on the [[WP:CFB|college football WikiProject]] ({{tk|Wikipedia:WikiProject College football}}). Once a format has been decided on and agreed to, I'd say the template would go in the Structure section ([[WP:CFB#Structure|here]]). But that is a good idea and look forward to an open discussion regarding it.--[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 00:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

45983 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 45983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-29 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.191078180E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 08:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
45984 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ Addict 2006 +++$+++ 45983 +++$+++ 45983 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.191114660E09 +++$+++ '''Fixed.''' -- +++$+++ :'''Fixed.''' --[[User:Addict 2006|Addict]] [[User talk:Addict 2006|2006]] 18:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

538044 +++$+++ LaszloWalrus +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-09 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.155177000E09 +++$+++ He is already in the category \"Duke Blue Devils men's basketball players.\" That category is a subcategory of Duke University alumni. It's not a big deal, but I think that generally it's bad to have people in a category AND in its subcategory. Everyone will know he is an alumnus because he is in the subcategory.  +++$+++ He is already in the category "Duke Blue Devils men's basketball players." That category is a subcategory of Duke University alumni. It's not a big deal, but I think that generally it's bad to have people in a category AND in its subcategory. Everyone will know he is an alumnus because he is in the subcategory. [[User:LaszloWalrus|LaszloWalrus]] 19:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
538045 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538044 +++$+++ 538044 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.155177660E09 +++$+++ Well, I guess I disagree with that assertion. I will leave this one alone, but is many cases, just because a person played sports there does not mean they graduated from there. An alumni is (as I understand the definition) is a graduate of a school. Many athletes do not graduate, but may leave early with the intent of pursuing professional sports. But, in Capel's case, I don't think this applies. Thanks for the clarification.-- +++$+++ :Well, I guess I disagree with that assertion. I will leave this one alone, but is many cases, just because a person played sports there does not mean they graduated from there. An alumni is (as I understand the definition) is a graduate of a school. Many athletes do not graduate, but may leave early with the intent of pursuing professional sports. But, in Capel's case, I don't think this applies. Thanks for the clarification.--[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 19:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

538046 +++$+++ Redvers +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-09 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.155183000E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! :) Autoblock unblocks are a pain in the, er, ankle. They come in about four varieties, each with a couple of different potential reasons. Also, for privacy reasons, we don't see the entire picture - we have to make educated guesses, trial unblocks and the like. Of course, the alternative is to let vandals run wild... New software is making this easier, but the introduction is slow and admins have a learning curve (the latter hit you, I think). I'm sorry you were hit by the autoblock: Wikipedia needs good, productive editors, and technical restrictions on them really don't help anybody. Thanks for being a good sport! [[User_talk:Redvers|\u27a8 ]]<b><font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ You're welcome! :) Autoblock unblocks are a pain in the, er, ankle. They come in about four varieties, each with a couple of different potential reasons. Also, for privacy reasons, we don't see the entire picture - we have to make educated guesses, trial unblocks and the like. Of course, the alternative is to let vandals run wild... New software is making this easier, but the introduction is slow and admins have a learning curve (the latter hit you, I think). I'm sorry you were hit by the autoblock: Wikipedia needs good, productive editors, and technical restrictions on them really don't help anybody. Thanks for being a good sport! [[User_talk:Redvers|➨ ]]<b><font color="red">[[User:Redvers|ЯEDVERS]]</font></b> 21:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
538047 +++$+++ Henry Flower +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538046 +++$+++ 538046 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.155186060E09 +++$+++ Sorry if it was me who hit you with some friendly fire.  It wasn't you I was going for. ;)  +++$+++ :Sorry if it was me who hit you with some friendly fire.  It wasn't you I was going for. ;) [[User:Henry Flower|Henry]][[User talk:Henry Flower|<sup>Flower</sup>]] 22:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
538048 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538046 +++$+++ 538047 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.155204480E09 +++$+++ Haha, no problem at all. I figured that since it was an IP block and not username. At least I got it resolved quickly.-- +++$+++ ::Haha, no problem at all. I figured that since it was an IP block and not username. At least I got it resolved quickly.--[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 03:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

13761 +++$+++ Bzuk +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-09 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.289304180E09 +++$+++ See this image: [[File:Design Studies for the dh Comet.jpg|right|400 px|thumb|Design studies for the DH 106 Comet 1944-1947 (Artist's impression)]] FWiW  +++$+++ See this image: [[File:Design Studies for the dh Comet.jpg|right|400 px|thumb|Design studies for the DH 106 Comet 1944-1947 (Artist's impression)]] FWiW [[User:Bzuk|Bzuk]] ([[User talk:Bzuk|talk]]) 04:03, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
13762 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13761 +++$+++ 13761 +++$+++ 2010-11-09 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.289341620E09 +++$+++ Is this what you have been up to? I was not expecting you to create images for the article! I'm guessing you found the drawings in one form or another in your research, drew them out on pencil, scanned them in to neaten using something like Photoshop? It whould make an excellent addition to the design section, as it is easily missed by readers how wildly the early imagined forms differed from the the final product.  +++$+++ :Is this what you have been up to? I was not expecting you to create images for the article! I'm guessing you found the drawings in one form or another in your research, drew them out on pencil, scanned them in to neaten using something like Photoshop? It whould make an excellent addition to the design section, as it is easily missed by readers how wildly the early imagined forms differed from the the final product. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 14:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

13763 +++$+++ Shimgray +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-23 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.295776980E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, I've passed [[SEPECAT Jaguar]] as a GA. Thanks!  +++$+++ Just to let you know, I've passed [[SEPECAT Jaguar]] as a GA. Thanks! [[User:Shimgray|Shimgray]] | [[User talk:Shimgray|talk]] | 02:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
13764 +++$+++ Shimgray +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13763 +++$+++ 13763 +++$+++ 2011-01-23 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.295779020E09 +++$+++ Thanks! This is the first GA I've handled where there's been quite this level of development during the review (and from multiple people, too, which is unusual) - it's been a real pleasure to handle. Good luck with the next one!  +++$+++ :Thanks! This is the first GA I've handled where there's been quite this level of development during the review (and from multiple people, too, which is unusual) - it's been a real pleasure to handle. Good luck with the next one! [[User:Shimgray|Shimgray]] | [[User talk:Shimgray|talk]] | 02:37, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

275908 +++$+++ Running +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.168568820E09 +++$+++ i know what you're talking about (this \"my opinion\" with MS windows and Mac OS) - but this thing about \"copying\" mac os is noted in [[Apple Computer]] too and I think it's important enough to be in Windows article. Or delete it from Apple Computer article too. -- +++$+++ i know what you're talking about (this "my opinion" with MS windows and Mac OS) - but this thing about "copying" mac os is noted in [[Apple Computer]] too and I think it's important enough to be in Windows article. Or delete it from Apple Computer article too. --[[User:Running|Running]] 18:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
275909 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275908 +++$+++ 275908 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.168569360E09 +++$+++ Done.  Thanks for pointing that out.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Done.  Thanks for pointing that out.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 18:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

13765 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13765 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-26 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.296111240E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for your effort to clean up my mistakes and improve the [[Airbus A330]] article in general. I've got one request; do you know where to get a picture of the A330\/A340 wing? They're essentially the same, making it pretty unique in the industry. I've gone through Flickr but I can't seem to find any image about the wing itself? Do you have any idea what I should do? Best regards [[Image:Face-grin.svg|25px]]  +++$+++ Thank you very much for your effort to clean up my mistakes and improve the [[Airbus A330]] article in general. I've got one request; do you know where to get a picture of the A330/A340 wing? They're essentially the same, making it pretty unique in the industry. I've gone through Flickr but I can't seem to find any image about the wing itself? Do you have any idea what I should do? Best regards [[Image:Face-grin.svg|25px]] [[User:Sp33dyphil|<big>'''<span style="background:SaddleBrown;color:Gold">'''Sp33dyphil</span></big>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Talk]])</sup> <sup>([[Special:contributions/Sp33dyphil|Contributions]])</sup><sup>(I love Wikipedia!)</sup> 22:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
13766 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13765 +++$+++ 13765 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.296165000E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid I have no ideas on where to get any image from. You could try looking through issues of Flight International, they might have detailed diagrams of these sort of things, but you'd have to link it in a special way if you did find something (I can help with that bit). I'll do some hunting on my own, but I can't promise any luck.  +++$+++ :I'm afraid I have no ideas on where to get any image from. You could try looking through issues of Flight International, they might have detailed diagrams of these sort of things, but you'd have to link it in a special way if you did find something (I can help with that bit). I'll do some hunting on my own, but I can't promise any luck. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 13:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
13767 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13765 +++$+++ 13765 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.296833940E09 +++$+++ Since you have such a long edit history concerning aviation, do you mind telling me what is missing from [[Airbus A330]] that is blocking it from FA status? Please be frank and comprehensive, because I dearly want the article to be promoted to FA.  +++$+++ :Since you have such a long edit history concerning aviation, do you mind telling me what is missing from [[Airbus A330]] that is blocking it from FA status? Please be frank and comprehensive, because I dearly want the article to be promoted to FA. [[User:Sp33dyphil|<big>'''<span style="background:SaddleBrown;color:Gold">'''Sp33dyphil</span></big>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Sp33dyphil|T]] • [[Special:contributions/Sp33dyphil|C]] • I love Wikipedia!)</sup>  07:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
13768 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13765 +++$+++ 13767 +++$+++ 2011-02-05 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.296935100E09 +++$+++ I've only once tried to take an article to FA, and it was a horrible experience, several editors who enjoyed sniping and slamming down my efforts to carry out their requests, I could swear one person was doing it gleefully, yet prepared to do absolutely nothing to do the simplest and most pointless stylistic changes (but of course, create an enourmous amount of hostility about it, to the point where'd they appeared to be putting more effort into the attacks than the work they wanted done themselves). In short, I found it to be de-motivational, destructive, immature, and pointless; and I vowed never to take an article into an FA Review again; I can't bring myself to risk encountering the same jerk again, not as a volenteer anyhow. So perhaps I'm a bad person to talk to about the FA process, I know about how to drag an article up in quality from years of mediocrity, but I can't put up with the horrible treatment and the amount of bile that some of the 'reviewers' that frequent the FA system see as appropriate to behave it. It almost made me snap, so I just let the review go; better that than spend another second putting up with that individual.  +++$+++ ::I've only once tried to take an article to FA, and it was a horrible experience, several editors who enjoyed sniping and slamming down my efforts to carry out their requests, I could swear one person was doing it gleefully, yet prepared to do absolutely nothing to do the simplest and most pointless stylistic changes (but of course, create an enourmous amount of hostility about it, to the point where'd they appeared to be putting more effort into the attacks than the work they wanted done themselves). In short, I found it to be de-motivational, destructive, immature, and pointless; and I vowed never to take an article into an FA Review again; I can't bring myself to risk encountering the same jerk again, not as a volenteer anyhow. So perhaps I'm a bad person to talk to about the FA process, I know about how to drag an article up in quality from years of mediocrity, but I can't put up with the horrible treatment and the amount of bile that some of the 'reviewers' that frequent the FA system see as appropriate to behave it. It almost made me snap, so I just let the review go; better that than spend another second putting up with that individual. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 11:45, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

570273 +++$+++ Wanderer57 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570273 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-28 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.209367920E09 +++$+++ Thank you,  +++$+++ Thank you, [[User:Wanderer57|Wanderer57]] ([[User talk:Wanderer57|talk]]) 00:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
570274 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570273 +++$+++ 570273 +++$+++ 2008-04-28 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.209378900E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 03:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

538056 +++$+++ Z4ns4tsu +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-26 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.159319160E09 +++$+++ Hope you had a good vacation.  I think we kept the article up while you were away pretty well. <font style=\"color:#1e90ff;font-weight:bold\"> +++$+++ Hope you had a good vacation.  I think we kept the article up while you were away pretty well. <font style="color:#1e90ff;font-weight:bold">[[User:Z4ns4tsu|z4ns4tsu]]</font>\<sup><font style="color:black;">[[User_talk:Z4ns4tsu|talk]]</font></sup> 18:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
538057 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538056 +++$+++ 538056 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.159320660E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I had a great vacation. The article looks great, as always. Great commentary on the previous two games (UO & MTSU).-- +++$+++ :Thank you, I had a great vacation. The article looks great, as always. Great commentary on the previous two games (UO & MTSU).--[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 18:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

13769 +++$+++ Andy Dingley +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-07 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.297141500E09 +++$+++ Would you care to name some of these \"many nations\"? Even ignoring the sizable delay of six years between the Lancaster being first replaced by Lincolns and the Canberra entering service, all the major operators of the Lancaster followed it with the Shackleton, another Lancaster-derivative. Whilst the Canberra certainly marked the obsolescence of such piston-engined bombers, it's unwarranted to claim that the Lancaster in particular was the last of the line.  +++$+++ Would you care to name some of these "many nations"? Even ignoring the sizable delay of six years between the Lancaster being first replaced by Lincolns and the Canberra entering service, all the major operators of the Lancaster followed it with the Shackleton, another Lancaster-derivative. Whilst the Canberra certainly marked the obsolescence of such piston-engined bombers, it's unwarranted to claim that the Lancaster in particular was the last of the line. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 21:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
13770 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13769 +++$+++ 13769 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.297142340E09 +++$+++ Well okay, I'm sorry then. I wasn't counting the Shackleton, a maritime patrol aircraft, as a bomber. I wasn't trying to claim that the Lancaster was the end of the line for piston-powered bombers as an end-of statement; but that in terms of several nation's bomber devisions, it was the last type of their aircraft in that role. The RAF retired them for Canberras and the V-bombers, no sign of another piston powered aircraft in service in the bomber role I believe is fair to say. The RAAF should have no more piston-powered bombers after the Lincoln, nor should the RCAF. I believe that there wasn't one in Argentina either. Discounting the Shackleton, was there another? I wasn't trying to say it was impossible, and that there may have been a minority of operators that did adopt another piston-powered bomber after that, most seemed to have gone over to jets after that point. I was only trying to illustrate how for some Air Forces, it was a transitional aircraft or an insurance policy, a reliable development upon an existing and trusted airframe, while more advanced and sceptic-challenged planes were developed, both turbo-prop and turbo-jet, for those operators to consider adopting.  +++$+++ :Well okay, I'm sorry then. I wasn't counting the Shackleton, a maritime patrol aircraft, as a bomber. I wasn't trying to claim that the Lancaster was the end of the line for piston-powered bombers as an end-of statement; but that in terms of several nation's bomber devisions, it was the last type of their aircraft in that role. The RAF retired them for Canberras and the V-bombers, no sign of another piston powered aircraft in service in the bomber role I believe is fair to say. The RAAF should have no more piston-powered bombers after the Lincoln, nor should the RCAF. I believe that there wasn't one in Argentina either. Discounting the Shackleton, was there another? I wasn't trying to say it was impossible, and that there may have been a minority of operators that did adopt another piston-powered bomber after that, most seemed to have gone over to jets after that point. I was only trying to illustrate how for some Air Forces, it was a transitional aircraft or an insurance policy, a reliable development upon an existing and trusted airframe, while more advanced and sceptic-challenged planes were developed, both turbo-prop and turbo-jet, for those operators to consider adopting. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 21:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
13771 +++$+++ Andy Dingley +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13769 +++$+++ 13770 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.297143060E09 +++$+++ The RAF operated both Lincolns and Washingtons between the Lancaster and the V bombers. The Shackleton was also operated, although you could argue that it's maritime patrol, not a land bomber. The Canberra is also much closer to being a Mosquito replacement than a Lancaster replacement - in particular, from looking at their allocation within the RAF.  +++$+++ :: The RAF operated both Lincolns and Washingtons between the Lancaster and the V bombers. The Shackleton was also operated, although you could argue that it's maritime patrol, not a land bomber. The Canberra is also much closer to being a Mosquito replacement than a Lancaster replacement - in particular, from looking at their allocation within the RAF. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 21:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
13772 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13769 +++$+++ 13771 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.297143480E09 +++$+++ Actually there's a been a little bit of a misunderstanding; I wasn't trying to suggest that the Lancaster was the last piston-powered bomber for some nations, but that the Lincoln was. I do agree that the Canberra was much more of a tactical fighter-bomber in practice, especially considering it couldn't fit nuclear weapons for a good part of its front-line life, and even then only tactical ones compared with the strategics on the V-bombers and the submarines. The Washington I see as a rather odd fluke, the Americans made an out-of-the-blue approach to the British government, and it was loaned out for the nuclear delivery role; not that this means it doesn't count, but it certainly was one of the more 'odd' aquisitions.  +++$+++ :::Actually there's a been a little bit of a misunderstanding; I wasn't trying to suggest that the Lancaster was the last piston-powered bomber for some nations, but that the Lincoln was. I do agree that the Canberra was much more of a tactical fighter-bomber in practice, especially considering it couldn't fit nuclear weapons for a good part of its front-line life, and even then only tactical ones compared with the strategics on the V-bombers and the submarines. The Washington I see as a rather odd fluke, the Americans made an out-of-the-blue approach to the British government, and it was loaned out for the nuclear delivery role; not that this means it doesn't count, but it certainly was one of the more 'odd' aquisitions. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 21:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

538058 +++$+++ David.Monniaux +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538058 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-03 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.159871640E09 +++$+++ Hi! Thanks for inserting <nowiki>{{fact}}<\/nowiki> in this article. However, with respect to [[WP:BLP|biographies of living people]], the correct course of action is to simply delete potentially libellious claims given without serious sources.  +++$+++ Hi! Thanks for inserting <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> in this article. However, with respect to [[WP:BLP|biographies of living people]], the correct course of action is to simply delete potentially libellious claims given without serious sources. [[User:David.Monniaux|David.Monniaux]] 03:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
538059 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538058 +++$+++ 538058 +++$+++ 2006-10-03 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.159905840E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for that info. I guess I was giving the editor the benefit of a doubt. I see you removed the text from the John Popper article. I may also remove it from the Blues Traveler article since its unsources and doesn't apply to the band as much as it does the individual. Thanks again for the info.-- +++$+++ :Thanks very much for that info. I guess I was giving the editor the benefit of a doubt. I see you removed the text from the John Popper article. I may also remove it from the Blues Traveler article since its unsources and doesn't apply to the band as much as it does the individual. Thanks again for the info.--[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 13:04, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

275915 +++$+++ Jutiphan +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275915 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-26 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.169821680E09 +++$+++ Hi.. I find that [[Shared source]] article seems to be inaccurate, misleading and bias. It would be great if you can help take a look at it. One issue for an example such as \"none of the license programs allows for commercial use of modified code.\" Thanks -- +++$+++ Hi.. I find that [[Shared source]] article seems to be inaccurate, misleading and bias. It would be great if you can help take a look at it. One issue for an example such as "none of the license programs allows for commercial use of modified code." Thanks --[[User:Jutiphan|Jutiphan]] | [[User Talk:Jutiphan|<span style="color:green">Talk</span>]] - 06:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
275916 +++$+++ Jutiphan +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275915 +++$+++ 275915 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 06:38:00 +++$+++ 1.169822280E09 +++$+++ Just to say hi. I really like your butwhy article. Very interesting. I really feel a lot of wikipedia articles are not having neutral tones with many Microsoft-related articles and I have to say I feel less of the Wikipedia as a whole because of this. It is just frustrated to see how open-source minded people turned out to be so \"closed\" on it while on another hand Microsoft seems to be \"more open\" -- +++$+++ :Just to say hi. I really like your butwhy article. Very interesting. I really feel a lot of wikipedia articles are not having neutral tones with many Microsoft-related articles and I have to say I feel less of the Wikipedia as a whole because of this. It is just frustrated to see how open-source minded people turned out to be so "closed" on it while on another hand Microsoft seems to be "more open" --[[User:Jutiphan|Jutiphan]] | [[User Talk:Jutiphan|<span style="color:green">Talk</span>]] - 06:38, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
275917 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275915 +++$+++ 275916 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.169825640E09 +++$+++ I'll have a look at [[Shared source]] sometime soon, but I really know very little of the details of Microsoft's shared source licenses. I'll have to do some research.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :: I'll have a look at [[Shared source]] sometime soon, but I really know very little of the details of Microsoft's shared source licenses. I'll have to do some research.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 07:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
275918 +++$+++ Jutiphan +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275915 +++$+++ 275917 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.169857800E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your reply. I may just as well try to fix it myself -- +++$+++ :::Thank you for your reply. I may just as well try to fix it myself --[[User:Jutiphan|Jutiphan]] | [[User Talk:Jutiphan|<span style="color:green">Talk</span>]] - 16:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

13773 +++$+++ Bzuk +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-17 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.297986720E09 +++$+++ Looking for another GA-type article that is semi-related to the RAF ?! I stumbled on this stub last night, spent two hours on it and brought it up to spec. See what you think? FWiW  +++$+++ Looking for another GA-type article that is semi-related to the RAF ?! I stumbled on this stub last night, spent two hours on it and brought it up to spec. See what you think? FWiW [[User:Bzuk|Bzuk]] ([[User talk:Bzuk|talk]]) 15:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
13774 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13773 +++$+++ 13773 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.298018520E09 +++$+++ You've obviously noticed my edits, I've made some additions to the references and operational history, and rewritten the intro. In my opinion, it is good enough to GAN right now. I'd never heard of this place until you mentioned it, any special connection to such an obscure critter?  +++$+++ :You've obviously noticed my edits, I've made some additions to the references and operational history, and rewritten the intro. In my opinion, it is good enough to GAN right now. I'd never heard of this place until you mentioned it, any special connection to such an obscure critter? [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 00:42, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
13775 +++$+++ Bzuk +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13773 +++$+++ 13774 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.298068320E09 +++$+++ Hi K, absolutely none at all, but I noticed that the savaging that Baugher had taken recently on a related article, the Douglas C-33 and traced some connection to the story of this little-known fighter\/bomber. I like to do some out-of-left field research at times, `a la [[AFVG]] and this one was intriguing; it also spawned a bio on [[Kristian \xd8stby]], the Norwegian military officer who was involved in its procurement. FWiW  +++$+++ ::Hi K, absolutely none at all, but I noticed that the savaging that Baugher had taken recently on a related article, the Douglas C-33 and traced some connection to the story of this little-known fighter/bomber. I like to do some out-of-left field research at times, `a la [[AFVG]] and this one was intriguing; it also spawned a bio on [[Kristian Østby]], the Norwegian military officer who was involved in its procurement. FWiW [[User:Bzuk|Bzuk]] ([[User talk:Bzuk|talk]]) 14:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
13776 +++$+++ Manxruler +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13773 +++$+++ 13773 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.298070720E09 +++$+++ Jumping in to the conversion here. I don't believe it is quite ready yet. I have more sources on the aircraft and will add them pretty soon. Please wait with the GAN nom a little longer until I've got the missing stuff in place.  +++$+++ :Jumping in to the conversion here. I don't believe it is quite ready yet. I have more sources on the aircraft and will add them pretty soon. Please wait with the GAN nom a little longer until I've got the missing stuff in place. [[User:Manxruler|Manxruler]] ([[User talk:Manxruler|talk]]) 15:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
13777 +++$+++ Bzuk +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13773 +++$+++ 13775 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.298078460E09 +++$+++ Agree, I can still juice it up quite a bit but it was not a really significant aircraft after all. FWiW  +++$+++ :::Agree, I can still juice it up quite a bit but it was not a really significant aircraft after all. FWiW [[User:Bzuk|Bzuk]] ([[User talk:Bzuk|talk]]) 17:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

538063 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538063 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-11 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.165900860E09 +++$+++ Yah, when I first started doing templates it was recommended to do <nowiki><tr><td><\/nowiki> because the pipe didn't work. I just discovered the {{tl|!}} like 5 days ago and agree it is the better way to go, in the long run. But for now, since it's already done with the <nowiki><tr><td><\/nowiki> stuff, I'd just leave it. When I, or someone gets the motivation to switch it over it'll still be there. I think you converted another template I did (and I saw it took you several tries and awhile) so thanks for that. And thanks for the tip. I guess I should go look at the conditionals where I learned it and see if it still says to use <nowiki><tr><td><\/nowiki> and if so change it to {{tl|!}}. If you can improve any of \"my\" templates, please do so. I like doing them, but by no means am I good at programming or tables or styles or all the above. -- +++$+++ Yah, when I first started doing templates it was recommended to do <nowiki><tr><td></nowiki> because the pipe didn't work. I just discovered the {{tl|!}} like 5 days ago and agree it is the better way to go, in the long run. But for now, since it's already done with the <nowiki><tr><td></nowiki> stuff, I'd just leave it. When I, or someone gets the motivation to switch it over it'll still be there. I think you converted another template I did (and I saw it took you several tries and awhile) so thanks for that. And thanks for the tip. I guess I should go look at the conditionals where I learned it and see if it still says to use <nowiki><tr><td></nowiki> and if so change it to {{tl|!}}. If you can improve any of "my" templates, please do so. I like doing them, but by no means am I good at programming or tables or styles or all the above. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 21:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
538064 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538063 +++$+++ 538063 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.168488360E09 +++$+++ Help. [[User:Mecu\/NCAASingleGameHeadertest]]. I tried to convert it and it just gets uglier with every edit. The purge is at the bottom. -- +++$+++ :Help. [[User:Mecu/NCAASingleGameHeadertest]]. I tried to convert it and it just gets uglier with every edit. The purge is at the bottom. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 20:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

13779 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13779 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-01 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.298977200E09 +++$+++ You have an initial review at [[Talk:BAE Systems Nimrod MRA4\/GA1]]. There are a few isues I feel need to be addressed before the review can go any further, so I've placed it on hold for a week. If you'd ping me when you think you;ve addressed those points, I'll revisit the article. Best,  +++$+++ You have an initial review at [[Talk:BAE Systems Nimrod MRA4/GA1]]. There are a few isues I feel need to be addressed before the review can go any further, so I've placed it on hold for a week. If you'd ping me when you think you;ve addressed those points, I'll revisit the article. Best, [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  03:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
13780 +++$+++ Fnlayson +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13779 +++$+++ 13779 +++$+++ 2011-03-01 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.299020880E09 +++$+++ I'll try to help with this, Kyteto.  I'll try to stay out of your way though. - +++$+++ : I'll try to help with this, Kyteto.  I'll try to stay out of your way though. -[[User:Fnlayson|Fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 15:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
13781 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13779 +++$+++ 13780 +++$+++ 2011-03-01 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.299026700E09 +++$+++ Don't be afraid of getting in my way Fnlayson, you've most likely a better copyeditor than I am. I'm not exactly good at addressing these kind of problems in an article, but I'll be trying my best to bring it up to scratch.  +++$+++ ::Don't be afraid of getting in my way Fnlayson, you've most likely a better copyeditor than I am. I'm not exactly good at addressing these kind of problems in an article, but I'll be trying my best to bring it up to scratch. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 16:45, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
13782 +++$+++ Fnlayson +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13779 +++$+++ 13781 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.299119100E09 +++$+++ I suppose, but I'm not that familiar with the Nimrod.  The article is much better now.  I'll look over it some more to see if more needs to be done. - +++$+++ ::: I suppose, but I'm not that familiar with the Nimrod.  The article is much better now.  I'll look over it some more to see if more needs to be done. -[[User:Fnlayson|Fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 18:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
13783 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13779 +++$+++ 13782 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.299119400E09 +++$+++ To be honest, I think you have more of a clue about the Nimrod than the guys at BAE who designed a wing for it BEFORE examining the aircraft and finding out they weren't all identical, requiring a redesign and a three year delay! :P  I'll keep staring at it to see what changes I can make as well.  +++$+++ ::::To be honest, I think you have more of a clue about the Nimrod than the guys at BAE who designed a wing for it BEFORE examining the aircraft and finding out they weren't all identical, requiring a redesign and a three year delay! :P  I'll keep staring at it to see what changes I can make as well. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 18:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

275925 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-05 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.170682380E09 +++$+++ Hey Warren, I just wanted to know your opinion... [[User:Longzheng|Long Zheng]] has pointed me to [http:\/\/weblogs.asp.net\/kennykerr\/archive\/2007\/01\/28\/window-clippings-1-5.aspx Window Clippings], and it provides a nice screenshot effect, as seen [[:Image:Officeword2007.png|here]]. Do you want me to re-upload some of my Windows Vista screenshots with the same effect? \u2014  +++$+++ Hey Warren, I just wanted to know your opinion... [[User:Longzheng|Long Zheng]] has pointed me to [http://weblogs.asp.net/kennykerr/archive/2007/01/28/window-clippings-1-5.aspx Window Clippings], and it provides a nice screenshot effect, as seen [[:Image:Officeword2007.png|here]]. Do you want me to re-upload some of my Windows Vista screenshots with the same effect? — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 05:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
275926 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275925 +++$+++ 275925 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.170683100E09 +++$+++ Whoah, neat!  I like it... it's always bugged me a bit from a purely aesthetic view that we're showing arbitrary desktop backgrounds through some of the glass effect screenshots.  I'm not dealing much with screenshots these days, though; [[User:Themodernizer]] has been doing a lot of awesome work in getting all the images up to RTM + Glass level, with good names too, so you should confer with him on it. I'm sure he'll like it. :-)  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Whoah, neat!  I like it... it's always bugged me a bit from a purely aesthetic view that we're showing arbitrary desktop backgrounds through some of the glass effect screenshots.  I'm not dealing much with screenshots these days, though; [[User:Themodernizer]] has been doing a lot of awesome work in getting all the images up to RTM + Glass level, with good names too, so you should confer with him on it. I'm sure he'll like it. :-)  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 05:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
275927 +++$+++ Themodernizer +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275925 +++$+++ 275926 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.170740700E09 +++$+++ Such screenshots are better from an aesthetic point of view, in my opinion. I believe that it would be preferable to have all Windows Vista screenshots taken using such a method.  +++$+++ ::Such screenshots are better from an aesthetic point of view, in my opinion. I believe that it would be preferable to have all Windows Vista screenshots taken using such a method. [[User:Themodernizer|Themodernizer]] 21:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

538070 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-19 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.166519520E09 +++$+++ Yah, they actually do something, or rather, they prevent something from happening. If you notice, they start at the end of each line and end at the start of the next line. In short, they prevent a new linefeed\/carriage return from being rendered or they prevent newline specialties from occurring. Like, when # is on a newline, you can use this trick to prevent that. But in that template, they just prevent extra lines from be generated when the optional fields aren't used. You could copy the template somewhere, remove all of them and check it out. Just be sure to leave the optional fields out. -- +++$+++ Yah, they actually do something, or rather, they prevent something from happening. If you notice, they start at the end of each line and end at the start of the next line. In short, they prevent a new linefeed/carriage return from being rendered or they prevent newline specialties from occurring. Like, when # is on a newline, you can use this trick to prevent that. But in that template, they just prevent extra lines from be generated when the optional fields aren't used. You could copy the template somewhere, remove all of them and check it out. Just be sure to leave the optional fields out. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 01:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
538071 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538070 +++$+++ 538070 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.166520720E09 +++$+++ Maybe you're a better coder than me. Or maybe it's because you've used the {{tl|!}} instead of HTML tags. But yah, it looks like your way works fine. -- +++$+++ :Maybe you're a better coder than me. Or maybe it's because you've used the {{tl|!}} instead of HTML tags. But yah, it looks like your way works fine. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 01:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
538072 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538070 +++$+++ 538071 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.166568360E09 +++$+++ I agree the ! is much better method, both for readability and edit-ability and it keeps the syntax closer to the wiki markup. That info box is looking pretty good. I'm starting to get jealous. -- +++$+++ ::I agree the ! is much better method, both for readability and edit-ability and it keeps the syntax closer to the wiki markup. That info box is looking pretty good. I'm starting to get jealous. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 14:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

13784 +++$+++ Harrison49 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-12 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.302668040E09 +++$+++ Excellent! Thank you for the link. I'm sorry if the links I added were unreliable, although RAFweb seems to be linked in several RAF articles.  +++$+++ Excellent! Thank you for the link. I'm sorry if the links I added were unreliable, although RAFweb seems to be linked in several RAF articles. [[User:Harrison49|Harrison49]] ([[User talk:Harrison49|talk]]) 21:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
13785 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13784 +++$+++ 13784 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.302668460E09 +++$+++ That is fine, it is an easy mistake to make, especially with other articles setting poor examples. Many articles on Wikipedia are yet to be reviewed, and a good portion would fail the specifications of [[WP:GA]] quality-articles. I tend to select one or so articles a month to fully overhaul and refurbish to the higher levels of quality; last month's [[Hawker Siddeley Harrier]] went exceptionally well. I like to think I've helped make a difference here, and continue trying to do. I like being able to help and learn as I go.  +++$+++ :That is fine, it is an easy mistake to make, especially with other articles setting poor examples. Many articles on Wikipedia are yet to be reviewed, and a good portion would fail the specifications of [[WP:GA]] quality-articles. I tend to select one or so articles a month to fully overhaul and refurbish to the higher levels of quality; last month's [[Hawker Siddeley Harrier]] went exceptionally well. I like to think I've helped make a difference here, and continue trying to do. I like being able to help and learn as I go. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 21:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

13786 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-09 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.304974740E09 +++$+++ Just checking up on progress, really. Do you think you've got much left to do? When you think you've addressed all my concerns and anything else you wanted to tweak or fix, let me know and I'll read through it again and then probably support it for A-class. Once you've got it to A-class, I think you'llo have a good chance at FAC. Nice work.  +++$+++ Just checking up on progress, really. Do you think you've got much left to do? When you think you've addressed all my concerns and anything else you wanted to tweak or fix, let me know and I'll read through it again and then probably support it for A-class. Once you've got it to A-class, I think you'llo have a good chance at FAC. Nice work. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  13:59, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
13787 +++$+++ BilCat +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13786 +++$+++ 13786 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.305046440E09 +++$+++ Re [[Harrier variants]], that should really be discussed first, or at least a link to a dsicussion elsewhere provided on the articles' talk pages, as there are other ways to split the articles. It would be helpful if you'd revert the split until a clear consesnus is reached. Thanks. -  +++$+++ :Re [[Harrier variants]], that should really be discussed first, or at least a link to a dsicussion elsewhere provided on the articles' talk pages, as there are other ways to split the articles. It would be helpful if you'd revert the split until a clear consesnus is reached. Thanks. - [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat|talk]]) 09:54, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
13788 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13786 +++$+++ 13787 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.305047460E09 +++$+++ Understood. Reverted.  +++$+++ ::Understood. Reverted. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 10:11, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
13789 +++$+++ BilCat +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13786 +++$+++ 13788 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.305047580E09 +++$+++ Thanks! -  +++$+++ :::Thanks! - [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat|talk]]) 10:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
13790 +++$+++ Fnlayson +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13786 +++$+++ 13788 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.305201000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for cleaning up and finishing the variant entry shortening, Kyteto.  I was not sure how to group the training variants and it was getting late.  - +++$+++ ::: Thanks for cleaning up and finishing the variant entry shortening, Kyteto.  I was not sure how to group the training variants and it was getting late.  -[[User:Fnlayson|Fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 04:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
13791 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13786 +++$+++ 13786 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.306437480E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm sorry to see the ACR was closed as unsuccessful. I guess that's the problem with relativvely late reviews and a strict 28-day limit. Still, you can renominate it as soon as you like and I think it's close, so don't be disheartened. I'm going to go back over the prose and MoS compliance in a few days and I might recruit another copy-editor or two, after which it should be ready.  +++$+++ *Well, I'm sorry to see the ACR was closed as unsuccessful. I guess that's the problem with relativvely late reviews and a strict 28-day limit. Still, you can renominate it as soon as you like and I think it's close, so don't be disheartened. I'm going to go back over the prose and MoS compliance in a few days and I might recruit another copy-editor or two, after which it should be ready. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  12:18, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

89679 +++$+++ Theoldanarchist +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-17 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.179458160E09 +++$+++ I wanted to thank you for that well-written edit to the Olbermann article.  As I am sure you are aware, the article has been a consistent target for the O'Reillyites.  Facts speak for themselves, without need of commentary.  Well done, sir. --- +++$+++ I wanted to thank you for that well-written edit to the Olbermann article.  As I am sure you are aware, the article has been a consistent target for the O'Reillyites.  Facts speak for themselves, without need of commentary.  Well done, sir. ---[[User:Theoldanarchist|Cathal]] 20:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
89680 +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89679 +++$+++ 89679 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.179479400E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  I noticed quite a while ago that the Olbermann article was\/is routinely assaulted by editors (usually anonymous ones) with a conservative bias.  I like to jump in and make attempts at reducing the POV whenever I can.- +++$+++ :Thanks!  I noticed quite a while ago that the Olbermann article was/is routinely assaulted by editors (usually anonymous ones) with a conservative bias.  I like to jump in and make attempts at reducing the POV whenever I can.-[[User:Hal Raglan|Hal Raglan]] 02:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
89681 +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89679 +++$+++ 89679 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.180473240E09 +++$+++ You've asked for \"some kind\" of explanation regarding my removal of your insertion of trivial information into the ''[[2001: A Space Odyssey (film)]]''.  As you indicated, you seem to now understand that wikipedia guidelines indicate that \"Trivia\" sections are not considered encyclopedic in nature.  Any information intended for such sections should instead by incorporated into the article proper.  I believe I mentioned this in my edit summary.  Also, the information was completely unsourced, which smacks of Original Research, another major wikipedia no-no.  To be fair, I believe  the IBM\/HAL thing has been noted in the past, possibly somewhere in Jerome Agel's ''2001'' book, so if you want you can re-add the info in a more logical place within the article, utilizing a less informal tone, ''and'' with the detail properly sourced.  Since you're the one who wants the info in the article, it is up to you to make sure its included properly.- +++$+++ :You've asked for "some kind" of explanation regarding my removal of your insertion of trivial information into the ''[[2001: A Space Odyssey (film)]]''.  As you indicated, you seem to now understand that wikipedia guidelines indicate that "Trivia" sections are not considered encyclopedic in nature.  Any information intended for such sections should instead by incorporated into the article proper.  I believe I mentioned this in my edit summary.  Also, the information was completely unsourced, which smacks of Original Research, another major wikipedia no-no.  To be fair, I believe  the IBM/HAL thing has been noted in the past, possibly somewhere in Jerome Agel's ''2001'' book, so if you want you can re-add the info in a more logical place within the article, utilizing a less informal tone, ''and'' with the detail properly sourced.  Since you're the one who wants the info in the article, it is up to you to make sure its included properly.-[[User:Hal Raglan|Hal Raglan]] 14:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
89682 +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89679 +++$+++ 89681 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.180473480E09 +++$+++ Since writing my response, I note that someone else has addressed the issue.  Apparently this trivia has been definitively debunked by [[Arthur C. Clarke]] himself, as noted in the [[Hal 9000]] article.- +++$+++ ::Since writing my response, I note that someone else has addressed the issue.  Apparently this trivia has been definitively debunked by [[Arthur C. Clarke]] himself, as noted in the [[Hal 9000]] article.-[[User:Hal Raglan|Hal Raglan]] 14:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

13793 +++$+++ Ian Rose +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13793 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-18 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.305749940E09 +++$+++ Hi mate, belately completed my ce and posted my (relatively few) comments... Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi mate, belately completed my ce and posted my (relatively few) comments... Cheers, [[User:Ian Rose|Ian Rose]] ([[User talk:Ian Rose|talk]]) 13:19, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
13794 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13793 +++$+++ 13793 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.306262520E09 +++$+++ I've got some comments as well, if you'd like to know them, but first I need your all-important permission, because I'm not the reviewer. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ready]] \u2022 [[Special:contributions\/Sp33dyphil|to]] \u2022  +++$+++ :I've got some comments as well, if you'd like to know them, but first I need your all-important permission, because I'm not the reviewer. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ready]] • [[Special:contributions/Sp33dyphil|to]] • [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|Rumble]]</sup>  11:42, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
13795 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13793 +++$+++ 13794 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.306263480E09 +++$+++ You are welcome to make input into the GAN.  +++$+++ ::You are welcome to make input into the GAN. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 11:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

275938 +++$+++ RN +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.172503680E09 +++$+++ Yeah I'm working like crazy now so not much wikipedia time but I'm amazed and glad you're still around :D  +++$+++ Yeah I'm working like crazy now so not much wikipedia time but I'm amazed and glad you're still around :D [[User:RN|RN]] 07:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
275939 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275938 +++$+++ 275938 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.172614320E09 +++$+++ I'm not interested in a lengthy and boring debate about Windows on my talk page, thank you.  Wikipedia is [[WP:NOT#FORUM|WP:NOT]] a discussion forum -- go find an Internet forum or write a blog if you want to write about that.  Here's the deal: poorly-written text gets removed from the encyclopedia, because we aim for high quality prose.  Also, stating that Bill Gates thinks that Windows NT is a good server product, without any security-related context about it, doesn't have any place in the \"Security\" section of a Wikipedia article.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : I'm not interested in a lengthy and boring debate about Windows on my talk page, thank you.  Wikipedia is [[WP:NOT#FORUM|WP:NOT]] a discussion forum -- go find an Internet forum or write a blog if you want to write about that.  Here's the deal: poorly-written text gets removed from the encyclopedia, because we aim for high quality prose.  Also, stating that Bill Gates thinks that Windows NT is a good server product, without any security-related context about it, doesn't have any place in the "Security" section of a Wikipedia article.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 14:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
275940 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275938 +++$+++ 275939 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.172645100E09 +++$+++ Emacsuser, please use the article talk pages to discuss changes to articles.  My talk page is not the place for it, since it excludes everybody else who wishes to discuss the matter.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :: Emacsuser, please use the article talk pages to discuss changes to articles.  My talk page is not the place for it, since it excludes everybody else who wishes to discuss the matter.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 22:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

13798 +++$+++ Nick-D +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-31 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.306843740E09 +++$+++ Hi Kyteto, I've started the GA review of this article and left comments at: [[Talk:AgustaWestland Apache\/GA1]]. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Kyteto, I've started the GA review of this article and left comments at: [[Talk:AgustaWestland Apache/GA1]]. Cheers, [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 05:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
13799 +++$+++ Fnlayson +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13798 +++$+++ 13798 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.309664580E09 +++$+++ Kyteto, keep up the good work with this article. - +++$+++ * Kyteto, keep up the good work with this article. -[[User:Fnlayson|Fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 20:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
13800 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13798 +++$+++ 13799 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309668840E09 +++$+++ I'll do my best, she's become a hot topic with this Libyan war; it's a good thing I overhauled her when I did!  +++$+++ ::I'll do my best, she's become a hot topic with this Libyan war; it's a good thing I overhauled her when I did! [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 21:54, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

538087 +++$+++ KP Botany +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-22 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.166834280E09 +++$+++ The article on the Sooners football is not as bad as many offered up for FA status, but it does need a lot of work, mostly an entire change of tone, and acknowledgement of who the audience could be: non-Okies, non-Americans, non-football players, why not make it something a young mother living in remote Africa sitting in the local library could and would read?  I think with serious work on the prose and choice of content it can be brought to FA status.  There are a lot of people who want their local AAA team, their college team, their pub darts' team to have FA status, and it's not going to happen, but it would be nice if you could show them how it's done.  I think you (and other editors) have the skills and the will to make it happen with the Sooners' football article--it's also, realistically a college team that could be a FA.  Please let me know if you want additional specific feedback after you've done some extensive work on this article by posting on my talk page, and I will critique it top to bottom.  Cheers,  +++$+++ The article on the Sooners football is not as bad as many offered up for FA status, but it does need a lot of work, mostly an entire change of tone, and acknowledgement of who the audience could be: non-Okies, non-Americans, non-football players, why not make it something a young mother living in remote Africa sitting in the local library could and would read?  I think with serious work on the prose and choice of content it can be brought to FA status.  There are a lot of people who want their local AAA team, their college team, their pub darts' team to have FA status, and it's not going to happen, but it would be nice if you could show them how it's done.  I think you (and other editors) have the skills and the will to make it happen with the Sooners' football article--it's also, realistically a college team that could be a FA.  Please let me know if you want additional specific feedback after you've done some extensive work on this article by posting on my talk page, and I will critique it top to bottom.  Cheers, [[User:KP Botany|KP Botany]] 16:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
538088 +++$+++ KP Botany +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538087 +++$+++ 538087 +++$+++ 2006-12-22 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.166836080E09 +++$+++ I disagree with your assessment of your ability to see the problems and correct it--the former is a matter of learning to look at it from an outsider's POV, something that you can learn to do by doing and by changing your mind-set or POV while writing, and the latter is a function of your present editing skills which are already up to the task.  I wouldn't have bothered giving you a simple object instead of a strong object, if I didn't think this was so--there are a lot of articles on Wikipedia that simply need a different editor, or a better editor, and this article is not one of them.  Take a break, come back, and start explaining OU Sooners football to a young woman in Africa.  Whatever your biases now, whatever your limitations, you have the right attitude and the skills and can learn a few things in the process to take this article to FA status.  It will be a lot of work, but I guarantee that when you wake up, log on, and see the OU Sooners football program on the Main Page it will be worth it.  Think of it as getting in shape for football season, and think of how you'll feel next Bedlam Series knowing that OSU was never on the front page of Wikipedia (do I sound a bit biased?  like maybe I ''personally'' want you to do it?  yes).    +++$+++ :I disagree with your assessment of your ability to see the problems and correct it--the former is a matter of learning to look at it from an outsider's POV, something that you can learn to do by doing and by changing your mind-set or POV while writing, and the latter is a function of your present editing skills which are already up to the task.  I wouldn't have bothered giving you a simple object instead of a strong object, if I didn't think this was so--there are a lot of articles on Wikipedia that simply need a different editor, or a better editor, and this article is not one of them.  Take a break, come back, and start explaining OU Sooners football to a young woman in Africa.  Whatever your biases now, whatever your limitations, you have the right attitude and the skills and can learn a few things in the process to take this article to FA status.  It will be a lot of work, but I guarantee that when you wake up, log on, and see the OU Sooners football program on the Main Page it will be worth it.  Think of it as getting in shape for football season, and think of how you'll feel next Bedlam Series knowing that OSU was never on the front page of Wikipedia (do I sound a bit biased?  like maybe I ''personally'' want you to do it?  yes).   [[User:KP Botany|KP Botany]] 17:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

13801 +++$+++ MilborneOne +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-08 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.307594580E09 +++$+++ Apology Kyteto I reverted your edit on [[Saab JAS 39 Gripen]] by mistake, I have changed it back.  +++$+++ Apology Kyteto I reverted your edit on [[Saab JAS 39 Gripen]] by mistake, I have changed it back. [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 21:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
13802 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13801 +++$+++ 13801 +++$+++ 2011-06-08 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.307595360E09 +++$+++ No harm done, all is fine. :) It is easy to get those button clicks wrong, I've done it in the past as well.  +++$+++ :No harm done, all is fine. :) It is easy to get those button clicks wrong, I've done it in the past as well. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 21:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

538091 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-31 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.167587880E09 +++$+++ In watching the [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Oklahoma Sooners football |nomintaion of the OU football program]], I see that the OU article has received some objections on the grounds of supposedly being overly positive and for listing too-many awards.  I have reviewed the 2006 UT article in light of those objections and I am prepared to argue that every positive thing said is relevant and attributed to a specific source.  As for the awards and accomplishments, I think all the ones listed in the UT article are notable and justifiable, but I'd like to get more feedback from other editors so I invite you to review the article if you please.  +++$+++ In watching the [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Oklahoma Sooners football |nomintaion of the OU football program]], I see that the OU article has received some objections on the grounds of supposedly being overly positive and for listing too-many awards.  I have reviewed the 2006 UT article in light of those objections and I am prepared to argue that every positive thing said is relevant and attributed to a specific source.  As for the awards and accomplishments, I think all the ones listed in the UT article are notable and justifiable, but I'd like to get more feedback from other editors so I invite you to review the article if you please. [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 09:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
538092 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538091 +++$+++ 538091 +++$+++ 2007-01-01 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.167639720E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much.  I have requested peer review [[Wikipedia:WikiProject College football\/Peer review|here]].  Good luck in the Fiesta and have a Happy New Year!   +++$+++ :Thank you very much.  I have requested peer review [[Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Peer review|here]].  Good luck in the Fiesta and have a Happy New Year!  [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 00:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

275948 +++$+++ Remember the dot +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275948 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-03 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.172973000E09 +++$+++ It is not my personal opinion that Ubuntu and Mac OS X offer a similar feature. What part of this do you want a reference for? \u2014 +++$+++ It is not my personal opinion that Ubuntu and Mac OS X offer a similar feature. What part of this do you want a reference for? —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] ([[User talk:Remember the dot|t]]) 17:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
275949 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275948 +++$+++ 275948 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.172980080E09 +++$+++ I'm not going to hold your hand through [[Wikipedia:Attribution]] and [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]], but the short of it is this:  Any statements which express a view or opinion ''must be attributable to a reliable source''.  It says this right in our content policies -- it's not up for discussion.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : I'm not going to hold your hand through [[Wikipedia:Attribution]] and [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]], but the short of it is this:  Any statements which express a view or opinion ''must be attributable to a reliable source''.  It says this right in our content policies -- it's not up for discussion.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 19:48, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

13805 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13805 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-11 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.307801460E09 +++$+++ Hi Kyteto, I'm wondering if you can overhaul the article [[McDonnell Douglas F\/A-18 Hornet]] prior to my mass addition of text in the next few weeks. Please ignore the banner if you choose to give it an overhaul. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ Hi Kyteto, I'm wondering if you can overhaul the article [[McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet]] prior to my mass addition of text in the next few weeks. Please ignore the banner if you choose to give it an overhaul. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 07:11, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
13806 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13805 +++$+++ 13805 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.307832660E09 +++$+++ I'll think on it, and keep looking at the article: which is the basis of all my overhauls, getting a feel for the article and its existing content. I've already got the GAN of the Kestrel, possible work on GANing the Gripen and A-Reviewing the Harrier, and I was considering doing a full-out tear-out and overhauling of the F-20 Tigershark, which I feel I really have got a feel for now. Take this as a maybe then, I won't rule out my attention, but is probably going to be less extensive than others if it happens.  +++$+++ :I'll think on it, and keep looking at the article: which is the basis of all my overhauls, getting a feel for the article and its existing content. I've already got the GAN of the Kestrel, possible work on GANing the Gripen and A-Reviewing the Harrier, and I was considering doing a full-out tear-out and overhauling of the F-20 Tigershark, which I feel I really have got a feel for now. Take this as a maybe then, I won't rule out my attention, but is probably going to be less extensive than others if it happens. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 15:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
13807 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13805 +++$+++ 13806 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.307863680E09 +++$+++ Looks like I'll have to go it alone then. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ ::Looks like I'll have to go it alone then. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 00:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

538095 +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538095 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-04 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.167950580E09 +++$+++ Hi Nmajdan, regarding your report to [[WP:AIV]]: that page is for cases of blatant vandalism only. Since your case is too complex for AIV, I moved your report to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Liisenber uploading copyright material|here]]. -- +++$+++ Hi Nmajdan, regarding your report to [[WP:AIV]]: that page is for cases of blatant vandalism only. Since your case is too complex for AIV, I moved your report to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Liisenber uploading copyright material|here]]. --[[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]] [[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''ʕ''']] 14:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
538096 +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538095 +++$+++ 538095 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.167950820E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. :-) -- +++$+++ :You're welcome. :-) --[[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]] [[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''ʕ''']] 14:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

13809 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13809 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-22 10:16:00 +++$+++ 1.308762960E09 +++$+++ Hi Kyteto, do you mind reviewing GA candidate [[Northrop YF-23]]? In return I'll review one of yours. Cheers [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ Hi Kyteto, do you mind reviewing GA candidate [[Northrop YF-23]]? In return I'll review one of yours. Cheers [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 10:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
13810 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13809 +++$+++ 13809 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.308769020E09 +++$+++ I'll think about it over the next few days. I don't usually do review-trading, but if it takes my fancy and I think I can do an apt job, I'll do it.  +++$+++ :I'll think about it over the next few days. I don't usually do review-trading, but if it takes my fancy and I think I can do an apt job, I'll do it. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 11:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
13811 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13809 +++$+++ 13810 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.308806640E09 +++$+++ The Hawker Siddeley P.1127 review's at [[Talk:Hawker Siddeley P.1127\/GA1\u200e]]. \u200e[[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ ::The Hawker Siddeley P.1127 review's at [[Talk:Hawker Siddeley P.1127/GA1‎]]. ‎[[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
13812 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13809 +++$+++ 13811 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.308856680E09 +++$+++ By the way, do you think the review(s) can finish in under a week, since I'm in the [[WP:CUP|CUP]]? Round 3 concludes at month's end. No pressure on you, since it's totally my fault I nominated them late. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ :::By the way, do you think the review(s) can finish in under a week, since I'm in the [[WP:CUP|CUP]]? Round 3 concludes at month's end. No pressure on you, since it's totally my fault I nominated them late. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 12:18, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
13813 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13809 +++$+++ 13812 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.308862500E09 +++$+++ To clarify, do you want [[Northrop YF-23]] to be reviewed with haste, or for me to respond to the P.1127 comments first? Just want to know which one is the priority, and I'll focus on that. I've already been reading the YF-23 over a few times, I can start commenting soon.  +++$+++ ::::To clarify, do you want [[Northrop YF-23]] to be reviewed with haste, or for me to respond to the P.1127 comments first? Just want to know which one is the priority, and I'll focus on that. I've already been reading the YF-23 over a few times, I can start commenting soon. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 13:55, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
13814 +++$+++ Ian Rose +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13809 +++$+++ 13813 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.308866700E09 +++$+++ Hi mate, I reviewed this evening but don't let that stop you commenting as well... ;-) Cheers,  +++$+++ :::::Hi mate, I reviewed this evening but don't let that stop you commenting as well... ;-) Cheers, [[User:Ian Rose|Ian Rose]] ([[User talk:Ian Rose|talk]]) 15:05, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
13815 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13809 +++$+++ 13814 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.308925380E09 +++$+++ Please concentrate on the P.1127. I'm willing to pass it, but first you need to make some minor changes as indicated on the review page. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ ::::::Please concentrate on the P.1127. I'm willing to pass it, but first you need to make some minor changes as indicated on the review page. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 07:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
13816 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13809 +++$+++ 13815 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.309169340E09 +++$+++ Please update your progress on the P.1127 GAN, so I can properly assess it. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ :::::::Please update your progress on the P.1127 GAN, so I can properly assess it. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 03:09, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

538098 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-08 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.168299900E09 +++$+++ Nope. I asked and was told to put them up for [[WP:IFD]]. They haven't gone through deletion yet (ie, been 5 days) I think, so I don't know if this is an effective method yet. I have some on Jan 4 (maybe earlier, I don't remember and too lazy to look) so we can watch those to see if they poof. If you're tagging lots of images you could look into adding the [[User talk:Howcheng\/quickimgdelete.js|quickimagedelete script]] to your monobook. It even helps with the IFD process and saves a ton of time. -- +++$+++ Nope. I asked and was told to put them up for [[WP:IFD]]. They haven't gone through deletion yet (ie, been 5 days) I think, so I don't know if this is an effective method yet. I have some on Jan 4 (maybe earlier, I don't remember and too lazy to look) so we can watch those to see if they poof. If you're tagging lots of images you could look into adding the [[User talk:Howcheng/quickimgdelete.js|quickimagedelete script]] to your monobook. It even helps with the IFD process and saves a ton of time. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 15:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
538099 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538098 +++$+++ 538098 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.168300440E09 +++$+++ Yup, IFD. Logos are pretty safe as the rationale seems fairly obvious. You could just write the rationale for it. Look at a few other similar logos to see if they have a rationale and just cut and paste and make the few minor changes they need. -- +++$+++ :Yup, IFD. Logos are pretty safe as the rationale seems fairly obvious. You could just write the rationale for it. Look at a few other similar logos to see if they have a rationale and just cut and paste and make the few minor changes they need. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 15:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
538100 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538098 +++$+++ 538099 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.168321560E09 +++$+++ Yes. For example, the IFD. Once you click it, and enter the IFD reason, it should open 3 pages and edit them appropriately and save them automatically. You just sit back and wait. I use it on Firefox 2 with no troubles. Make sure you have the required addons for the installation. See [[User talk:Howcheng\/quickimgdelete.js#Requirements]], they're kinda hidden so you may have missed it. -- +++$+++ ::Yes. For example, the IFD. Once you click it, and enter the IFD reason, it should open 3 pages and edit them appropriately and save them automatically. You just sit back and wait. I use it on Firefox 2 with no troubles. Make sure you have the required addons for the installation. See [[User talk:Howcheng/quickimgdelete.js#Requirements]], they're kinda hidden so you may have missed it. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 21:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
538101 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538098 +++$+++ 538099 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.168322340E09 +++$+++ I didn't see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts\/Scripts\/addLink]] in your monobook.js. I saw the other function though. -- +++$+++ ::I didn't see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/addLink]] in your monobook.js. I saw the other function though. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 21:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
538102 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538098 +++$+++ 538101 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.168322640E09 +++$+++ Weird, I even searched for \"addLink\". Anyways, if you look at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts\/Scripts\/addLink]] it says it's an \"improved\" version, so maybe try and install that one and remove the one you currently have? -- +++$+++ :::Weird, I even searched for "addLink". Anyways, if you look at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/addLink]] it says it's an "improved" version, so maybe try and install that one and remove the one you currently have? --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 22:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
538103 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538098 +++$+++ 538102 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.168322940E09 +++$+++ And I'll say this for the obvious, but just to make sure: You've reloaded the page on your monobook.js? Hitting CTRL-SHIFT-R? -- +++$+++ ::::And I'll say this for the obvious, but just to make sure: You've reloaded the page on your monobook.js? Hitting CTRL-SHIFT-R? --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 22:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
538104 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538098 +++$+++ 538103 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.168324440E09 +++$+++ I'm out of ideas. You could copy my monobook.js and delete yours and paste mine in and reload just to see if it works. If it does, then you've got something else in your monobook causing problems. Best I can think of. Sorry. -- +++$+++ :::::I'm out of ideas. You could copy my monobook.js and delete yours and paste mine in and reload just to see if it works. If it does, then you've got something else in your monobook causing problems. Best I can think of. Sorry. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 22:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
538105 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538098 +++$+++ 538104 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.168325160E09 +++$+++ I saw a lot of good stuff on yours that I'd like to use, so if you figure out what causes the error, let me know so I can avoid that one. Glad to help. -- +++$+++ ::::::I saw a lot of good stuff on yours that I'd like to use, so if you figure out what causes the error, let me know so I can avoid that one. Glad to help. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 22:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

275955 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-05 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.173092880E09 +++$+++ Heh, if some random person edits my user page solely to increase the vandalism count, does it count as vandalism, but it doesn't need to be reverted because it's correct?  Gah, a paradox! :-)  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ Heh, if some random person edits my user page solely to increase the vandalism count, does it count as vandalism, but it doesn't need to be reverted because it's correct?  Gah, a paradox! :-)  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 03:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
275956 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275955 +++$+++ 275955 +++$+++ 2007-03-05 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.173094320E09 +++$+++ Haha, yeah, I thought about it. Happened to me once, too. I decided to put the choice in your hands. :-) \u2014  +++$+++ : Haha, yeah, I thought about it. Happened to me once, too. I decided to put the choice in your hands. :-) — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 03:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
275957 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275955 +++$+++ 275955 +++$+++ 2007-03-05 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.173094560E09 +++$+++ I say revert it, because if it isn't reverted then it isn't vandalism. Revert and then increment the vandalism count. \u2014  +++$+++ : I say revert it, because if it isn't reverted then it isn't vandalism. Revert and then increment the vandalism count. — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 03:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

101348 +++$+++ Antonyapm +++$+++ Salih +++$+++ 101348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-22 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.285199460E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Antonyapm|Antonyapm]] ([[User talk:Antonyapm|talk]]) 16:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
101349 +++$+++ Salih +++$+++ Salih +++$+++ 101348 +++$+++ 101348 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.285200480E09 +++$+++ What way I can help you? <span style=\"\"> +++$+++ :What way I can help you? <span style="">[[User:Salih|<font style="color:#e90;">Salih</font>]] [[User talk:Salih|(<font style="color:#08c;">talk</font>)]]</span> 17:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
101350 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Salih +++$+++ 101348 +++$+++ 101349 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.285206540E09 +++$+++ FYI... The above account was blocked as a sockpuppet. --  +++$+++ ::FYI... The above account was blocked as a sockpuppet. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo|talk]]) 18:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
101351 +++$+++ Salih +++$+++ Salih +++$+++ 101348 +++$+++ 101350 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.285277040E09 +++$+++ That's interesting! Thanks FTI. <span style=\"\"> +++$+++ :::That's interesting! Thanks FTI. <span style="">[[User:Salih|<font style="color:#e90;">Salih</font>]] [[User talk:Salih|(<font style="color:#08c;">talk</font>)]]</span> 14:24, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

13817 +++$+++ Nick-D +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13817 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-29 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.309373160E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on the [[Hawker Siddeley Harrier]] article passing its ACR so easily - it's well deserved.  +++$+++ Congratulations on the [[Hawker Siddeley Harrier]] article passing its ACR so easily - it's well deserved. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 11:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
13818 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13817 +++$+++ 13817 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.309374120E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I plan to put it through a FAC soon enough. Let's see how it does at the most vicious levels of scrutiny.  +++$+++ :Thank you. I plan to put it through a FAC soon enough. Let's see how it does at the most vicious levels of scrutiny. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 12:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
13819 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.309766160E09 +++$+++ You might not have realised it, but lately I've been stuck into Soviet\/Russian aircraft, which don't receive a lot of attention from our fellow Wikipedians. At the moment, I'm working on [[Sukhoi Su-33]], and I plan to nominate it for GA, which itself would be a first, since no contemporary Russian fighter jet articles have achieved the feat. The books above a lot of detailed information about the Sukhoi aircraft; if you have access to one, please help me out, particularly at Su-33. Life for me will be so, so much easier. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ :::You might not have realised it, but lately I've been stuck into Soviet/Russian aircraft, which don't receive a lot of attention from our fellow Wikipedians. At the moment, I'm working on [[Sukhoi Su-33]], and I plan to nominate it for GA, which itself would be a first, since no contemporary Russian fighter jet articles have achieved the feat. The books above a lot of detailed information about the Sukhoi aircraft; if you have access to one, please help me out, particularly at Su-33. Life for me will be so, so much easier. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 00:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
13820 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 09:36:00 +++$+++ 1.309797360E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/#sclient=psy&hl=en&safe=off&tbm=bks&source=hp&q=carrier+Su-33&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=fa307c09de91d3c6&biw=1102&bih=717 Book Previews available] I wasn't able to find the books you asked for, but there are dozens of book sources available for viewing online. Just clicking on one, reading a page or three until you find something relevant, then cite it in, is the method I come across a lot of texts and citations to add to articles. It isn't very advanced, but it works well often.  +++$+++ ::::[http://www.google.co.uk/#sclient=psy&hl=en&safe=off&tbm=bks&source=hp&q=carrier+Su-33&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=fa307c09de91d3c6&biw=1102&bih=717 Book Previews available] I wasn't able to find the books you asked for, but there are dozens of book sources available for viewing online. Just clicking on one, reading a page or three until you find something relevant, then cite it in, is the method I come across a lot of texts and citations to add to articles. It isn't very advanced, but it works well often. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 09:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
13821 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13817 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.309850700E09 +++$+++ Sorry for butting in, but I noticed that you supported the Airbus A330 during the FAC; Sandy just restarted the FAC, which I think is a first, so do you mind going there once more? --[[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ :::::Sorry for butting in, but I noticed that you supported the Airbus A330 during the FAC; Sandy just restarted the FAC, which I think is a first, so do you mind going there once more? --[[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 00:25, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

275962 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-08 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.173404340E09 +++$+++ Hi. I was going through the Windows Vista articles looking at the template positioning. Due to its shape and due to the infoboxes, the template is widely varying in positioning, and in [[Windows Calendar|some cases]] looking really odd. Was just wondering if a horizontal template running across the bottom of the article be a better idea. --'' +++$+++ Hi. I was going through the Windows Vista articles looking at the template positioning. Due to its shape and due to the infoboxes, the template is widely varying in positioning, and in [[Windows Calendar|some cases]] looking really odd. Was just wondering if a horizontal template running across the bottom of the article be a better idea. --''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">soum</font>]]''<sup>সৌমো</sup>''[[User Talk:Soumyasch|<font color="#275799">yasch</font>]]'' 17:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
275963 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275962 +++$+++ 275962 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.173407040E09 +++$+++ The thing is, I only intended for it to be put on the main Vista articles, as per standard convention for article series templates... the [[User:Digita|user]] who added it to [[Windows Calendar]] has been doing a lot of similar unhelpful things on other articles (like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=WinFS&diff=113621152&oldid=113601449 adding] the {{tl|Microsoft}} template to [[WinFS]], and destroying the lead section in [[Internet Explorer]] for no particularily good reason.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : The thing is, I only intended for it to be put on the main Vista articles, as per standard convention for article series templates... the [[User:Digita|user]] who added it to [[Windows Calendar]] has been doing a lot of similar unhelpful things on other articles (like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WinFS&diff=113621152&oldid=113601449 adding] the {{tl|Microsoft}} template to [[WinFS]], and destroying the lead section in [[Internet Explorer]] for no particularily good reason.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 18:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

538107 +++$+++ General125 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538107 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-10 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.168488360E09 +++$+++ I was reading through the FA candidate discussion for [[Talk:Oklahoma Sooners football]].  It looks like those that criticized the POV of the article wanted it to be more like a soccer team's article.  Have you searched any of those? [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football#Featured_and_good_articles]]  I think the article looks great.  I suppose there could have been more about the probations and the scandals, but from their comments it looked like many of the reviewers were unfamiliar with the nature of college football, except for JonTex.  Shouldn't the article instead indoctrinate those unfamiliar with the Sooner Football team?  I'm pretty new to editing in Wikipedia.  I'm trying to get a [[TCU Horned Frogs]] page going, then I want to do one on TCU Football.  Just looking at that soccer project page and the list of featured articles they have makes me want to get a lot more college football featured articles.  +++$+++ I was reading through the FA candidate discussion for [[Talk:Oklahoma Sooners football]].  It looks like those that criticized the POV of the article wanted it to be more like a soccer team's article.  Have you searched any of those? [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football#Featured_and_good_articles]]  I think the article looks great.  I suppose there could have been more about the probations and the scandals, but from their comments it looked like many of the reviewers were unfamiliar with the nature of college football, except for JonTex.  Shouldn't the article instead indoctrinate those unfamiliar with the Sooner Football team?  I'm pretty new to editing in Wikipedia.  I'm trying to get a [[TCU Horned Frogs]] page going, then I want to do one on TCU Football.  Just looking at that soccer project page and the list of featured articles they have makes me want to get a lot more college football featured articles. [[User:General125|General125]] 20:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
538108 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538107 +++$+++ 538107 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.168491480E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I fixed it and put in a note.  I will also put in a hidden note in the Template itself.  +++$+++ :Thanks, I fixed it and put in a note.  I will also put in a hidden note in the Template itself. [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 20:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

275965 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-08 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.173411360E09 +++$+++ And I think you might like this one... we could collaborate on making an article that compares and contrasts the privilege escalation mechanisms in Windows and Unix.  There are some really interesting things that can be said in this context, like calling out the difference between su, sudo, runas, and UAC, and there's a lot of good, detailed documentation we can draw on.  Readers could draw their own conclusions about what approach is \"better\", and then the articles on UAC, sudo, etc. can all link to that.  If we stick with the factual details, we can avoid the issue of trying to answer questions like \"who came first?\" or \"who's better?\".... What do you think? <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ And I think you might like this one... we could collaborate on making an article that compares and contrasts the privilege escalation mechanisms in Windows and Unix.  There are some really interesting things that can be said in this context, like calling out the difference between su, sudo, runas, and UAC, and there's a lot of good, detailed documentation we can draw on.  Readers could draw their own conclusions about what approach is "better", and then the articles on UAC, sudo, etc. can all link to that.  If we stick with the factual details, we can avoid the issue of trying to answer questions like "who came first?" or "who's better?".... What do you think? <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 19:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
275966 +++$+++ Remember the dot +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275965 +++$+++ 275965 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.173424140E09 +++$+++ That would be fine. How about if we call it [[Comparison of privilege escalation features]]? That's a mouthful, but I can't think of anything shorter. Also, though it is a good idea to create this article and link to it on [[User Account Control]], [[sudo]] and [[su (Unix)]], sudo still deserves a brief mention in [[User Account Control]]. In the sufficiently brief \"Similarity to other operating systems\" section, the first line could be \"''Main article: [[Comparison of privilege escalation features]]''\". Similar sections could be added to [[sudo]] and [[su (Unix)]] if you'd like. \u2014 +++$+++ :That would be fine. How about if we call it [[Comparison of privilege escalation features]]? That's a mouthful, but I can't think of anything shorter. Also, though it is a good idea to create this article and link to it on [[User Account Control]], [[sudo]] and [[su (Unix)]], sudo still deserves a brief mention in [[User Account Control]]. In the sufficiently brief "Similarity to other operating systems" section, the first line could be "''Main article: [[Comparison of privilege escalation features]]''". Similar sections could be added to [[sudo]] and [[su (Unix)]] if you'd like. —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] ([[User talk:Remember the dot|t]]) 23:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
275967 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275965 +++$+++ 275966 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.173532320E09 +++$+++ Hmmm.... What if we went with something more basic like [[Elevation (computer security)]]?  It'd fit nicely into [[:Category:Operating system security]] since we don't appear to have a decent article which discusses the concept.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :: Hmmm.... What if we went with something more basic like [[Elevation (computer security)]]?  It'd fit nicely into [[:Category:Operating system security]] since we don't appear to have a decent article which discusses the concept.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 05:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

13822 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.309979520E09 +++$+++ On a slightly different note, I think it's the time to nominate the Harrier for FA. It's a terrific article, and it really deserves the star. Furthermore, do you reckon you might be able to do a really quick, but comprehensive, review of GAN [[YF-22]]? I know that's conflicting, but the article's not that long. Sorry I can't do the same for the F-20, since I've edited at the year's start. Lastly, you might laugh at this, but it doesn't say a lot about my character, do you think I deserve a barnstar for my work? I mean, I've been busy editing, and I didn't realise that I've got through so much. Anyway, all things said; cheers --[[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ On a slightly different note, I think it's the time to nominate the Harrier for FA. It's a terrific article, and it really deserves the star. Furthermore, do you reckon you might be able to do a really quick, but comprehensive, review of GAN [[YF-22]]? I know that's conflicting, but the article's not that long. Sorry I can't do the same for the F-20, since I've edited at the year's start. Lastly, you might laugh at this, but it doesn't say a lot about my character, do you think I deserve a barnstar for my work? I mean, I've been busy editing, and I didn't realise that I've got through so much. Anyway, all things said; cheers --[[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 12:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
13823 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13822 +++$+++ 13822 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.310080620E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid right now I don't have the time to dedicate to a rush-content filling of the MDD Harrier II, the next few days are extremely busy in the real world, I'll be lucky to spend half an hour online at all. In my opinion, a plane like the Harrier II should be given some time before nominating; many aviation editors like Fnlayson have had long term intentions to expand it, and giveing them the notice + chance to input could make a substancial difference to the article. I would contribute more to the effort myself, but I have very important things on for now. Not to mention, my Wiki time is being soaked up by 'putting out fires', dealing with the existing stuff that is pressing onwards. Probably early next week, I will FAC-nom the HS Harrier through, it would be interesting to see what happens. I won't be able to do a quick Review of the YF-23 though. On that final note, you do deserve some praise for your efforts: One way to get recognition is to inform the WP: Aircraft discussion board of an activity you're doing. I once got thanks from a senior editor for asking the community a question about an aircraft I was working on, which in turn got my work to overhaul it noticed. I'll be sketchy for now, I don't know when I'll even next have internet access.  +++$+++ :I'm afraid right now I don't have the time to dedicate to a rush-content filling of the MDD Harrier II, the next few days are extremely busy in the real world, I'll be lucky to spend half an hour online at all. In my opinion, a plane like the Harrier II should be given some time before nominating; many aviation editors like Fnlayson have had long term intentions to expand it, and giveing them the notice + chance to input could make a substancial difference to the article. I would contribute more to the effort myself, but I have very important things on for now. Not to mention, my Wiki time is being soaked up by 'putting out fires', dealing with the existing stuff that is pressing onwards. Probably early next week, I will FAC-nom the HS Harrier through, it would be interesting to see what happens. I won't be able to do a quick Review of the YF-23 though. On that final note, you do deserve some praise for your efforts: One way to get recognition is to inform the WP: Aircraft discussion board of an activity you're doing. I once got thanks from a senior editor for asking the community a question about an aircraft I was working on, which in turn got my work to overhaul it noticed. I'll be sketchy for now, I don't know when I'll even next have internet access. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 16:17, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
13824 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13822 +++$+++ 13823 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310112840E09 +++$+++ Lastly, if you'd like to chat to me directly, please go to [http:\/\/webchat.freenode.net\/?channels=##chzz]. That is, if you've got some free time and not busy as you are at the moment. Cheers [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ ::Lastly, if you'd like to chat to me directly, please go to [http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=##chzz]. That is, if you've got some free time and not busy as you are at the moment. Cheers [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 01:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

275968 +++$+++ Remember the dot +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275968 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.173537000E09 +++$+++ So, how about [[Comparison of action authorization features]]? It has a nice ring to it :D \u2014 +++$+++ So, how about [[Comparison of action authorization features]]? It has a nice ring to it :D —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] ([[User talk:Remember the dot|t]]) 06:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
275969 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275968 +++$+++ 275968 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.173537360E09 +++$+++ A good point indeed.  Who'd have thought that such a ubiquitous concept wouldn't have an agreed-upon term?  Oh well. Authorization is a good word, though... what if we combined it with privilege, e.g. [[Comparison of privilege authorization features]]?  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : A good point indeed.  Who'd have thought that such a ubiquitous concept wouldn't have an agreed-upon term?  Oh well. Authorization is a good word, though... what if we combined it with privilege, e.g. [[Comparison of privilege authorization features]]?  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 06:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

13829 +++$+++ The Founders Intent +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13829 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.312181340E09 +++$+++ \"The Apache did not conduct any combat missions over Kosovo due to fears over the risk of causalities, thus authorisation was never given; in addition, none of the pilots were qualified to fly with night vision goggles, preventing nighttime operations\" <<<< Does this make any sense to you, even if the ref says it? The Apache has PNVS, the pilots don't need NVGs. -- +++$+++ "The Apache did not conduct any combat missions over Kosovo due to fears over the risk of causalities, thus authorisation was never given; in addition, none of the pilots were qualified to fly with night vision goggles, preventing nighttime operations" <<<< Does this make any sense to you, even if the ref says it? The Apache has PNVS, the pilots don't need NVGs. --[[User:The Founders Intent|<font color="green">'''''T<small>HE</small> F<small>OUNDERS</small> I<small>NTENT </small>'''''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The Founders Intent|''PRAISE'']]</sup>  23:49, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
13830 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13829 +++$+++ 13829 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312182600E09 +++$+++ It does make some sense, but not looking back from today's mature Apache platform with hindsight. The PNVS and other targetting systems on the AH-64A may not have (back then) been judged suitable enough to provide all the capability necessary for the nighttime operations anticipated; remember those systems have been significantly readdressed and boosted twice over to today's current day technology. There are also multiple sources condemning the Apaches\/pilots as lacking the training\/equipment to conduct the very nightime operations they were posted out there for. The book explained it in quite lengthy detail as well. Apparently, according to the book, the NVG wasn't needed for most functions, but the Apache's own systems weren't able to do the full 360 degrees of compatilibity with every possible thing they could or might ask it to do, so to 'fill in the missing blank' NVGs were viewed as a necessary by command, and a very rushed programme to train up the pilots commenced; it was quite detailed on this, several pages. Taking a quote from a completely seperate, but less reliable source, so take it with a pinch of salt: \"The relatively old-technology infra-red sensors on the Apache are not suited to detecting and displaying obstacles such as power lines, so Task Force Hawk had to start a night vision goggle (NVG) training program...\". From a very reliable source back in 1999, the same era, (http:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?id=HhzA3wTmdP8C&pg=PA46&dq=Apache+NVG+Kosovo&hl=en&ei=j-w1TpKKNMix8gO3-ZGGCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Apache%20NVG%20Kosovo&f=false) backs this view up, that the both the pilot and weapons officer had to wear NVGs to see any obstructions or finer terrain details, and that the Army had to crash-course it, they were not ready to go at all. The use of both PNVS and NVG equipment was also noted in an issue of Jane's as baoth happening and damn difficult (My phrasing there!). It does look like it did happen then; thought it probably wouldn't now, as modernised systems have probably taken that poor experience into acount and plugged the holes that made the usage of NVGs necessary back then. Thanks for questioning me though, it made me triple-check my reasoning and learnt a few things on the way, including a detailed explaination I could add as a note perhaps.  +++$+++ :It does make some sense, but not looking back from today's mature Apache platform with hindsight. The PNVS and other targetting systems on the AH-64A may not have (back then) been judged suitable enough to provide all the capability necessary for the nighttime operations anticipated; remember those systems have been significantly readdressed and boosted twice over to today's current day technology. There are also multiple sources condemning the Apaches/pilots as lacking the training/equipment to conduct the very nightime operations they were posted out there for. The book explained it in quite lengthy detail as well. Apparently, according to the book, the NVG wasn't needed for most functions, but the Apache's own systems weren't able to do the full 360 degrees of compatilibity with every possible thing they could or might ask it to do, so to 'fill in the missing blank' NVGs were viewed as a necessary by command, and a very rushed programme to train up the pilots commenced; it was quite detailed on this, several pages. Taking a quote from a completely seperate, but less reliable source, so take it with a pinch of salt: "The relatively old-technology infra-red sensors on the Apache are not suited to detecting and displaying obstacles such as power lines, so Task Force Hawk had to start a night vision goggle (NVG) training program...". From a very reliable source back in 1999, the same era, (http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=HhzA3wTmdP8C&pg=PA46&dq=Apache+NVG+Kosovo&hl=en&ei=j-w1TpKKNMix8gO3-ZGGCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Apache%20NVG%20Kosovo&f=false) backs this view up, that the both the pilot and weapons officer had to wear NVGs to see any obstructions or finer terrain details, and that the Army had to crash-course it, they were not ready to go at all. The use of both PNVS and NVG equipment was also noted in an issue of Jane's as baoth happening and damn difficult (My phrasing there!). It does look like it did happen then; thought it probably wouldn't now, as modernised systems have probably taken that poor experience into acount and plugged the holes that made the usage of NVGs necessary back then. Thanks for questioning me though, it made me triple-check my reasoning and learnt a few things on the way, including a detailed explaination I could add as a note perhaps. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 00:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13831 +++$+++ The Founders Intent +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13829 +++$+++ 13830 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.312237800E09 +++$+++ I will have to remember to ask some pilots when I have an opportunity about this. NVGs on an already large helmet would definitely cause some issues. Trying to use IHADSS and NVGs at the same time would also be an issue. -- +++$+++ ::I will have to remember to ask some pilots when I have an opportunity about this. NVGs on an already large helmet would definitely cause some issues. Trying to use IHADSS and NVGs at the same time would also be an issue. --[[User:The Founders Intent|<font color="green">'''''T<small>HE</small> F<small>OUNDERS</small> I<small>NTENT </small>'''''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The Founders Intent|''PRAISE'']]</sup>  15:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
13832 +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ Kyteto +++$+++ 13829 +++$+++ 13831 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312238460E09 +++$+++ I believe that today, the problem has been resolved, the PNVS is now capable of providing the full resolution necessary to see things like aforementioned powerlines and wires that pose a serious threat to low flying helicopters; upgrades like the Arrowhead have greatly enhanced the system. You'd likely have to find pilots at least ten years back, maybe only those in the AH-64A, to find those who had to use the NVG as well. It could be that most pilots were never trained\/usxed NVGs, and simply were never prepared for this eventuality, as per Task Force Hawk; strategically it may have been decided to wait for upgrades to the PNVS instead, and live with the deficiency by avoiding low-flying at night. The Jane's references did mention that pilots were unhappy, and in some occasions disorientated, by having to deal with both systems, a botched-combination basically. The weapons officer didn't even need them to do his job, so it was written, it was just to provide an extra lookout to obsticles in support of the pilot.  +++$+++ :::I believe that today, the problem has been resolved, the PNVS is now capable of providing the full resolution necessary to see things like aforementioned powerlines and wires that pose a serious threat to low flying helicopters; upgrades like the Arrowhead have greatly enhanced the system. You'd likely have to find pilots at least ten years back, maybe only those in the AH-64A, to find those who had to use the NVG as well. It could be that most pilots were never trained/usxed NVGs, and simply were never prepared for this eventuality, as per Task Force Hawk; strategically it may have been decided to wait for upgrades to the PNVS instead, and live with the deficiency by avoiding low-flying at night. The Jane's references did mention that pilots were unhappy, and in some occasions disorientated, by having to deal with both systems, a botched-combination basically. The weapons officer didn't even need them to do his job, so it was written, it was just to provide an extra lookout to obsticles in support of the pilot. [[User:Kyteto|Kyteto]] ([[User talk:Kyteto#top|talk]]) 15:41, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

275974 +++$+++ Samvscat +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.173527880E09 +++$+++ I understand that you removed the reference from a May 2006 blog, but I think it was unneccessary to remove my entire edit and call it inaccurate. It ''is'' accurate information, as properly referenced in Paul Thurrott's review. You can also see in the screenshot of Windows Classic in the same Windows Vista article, there are some old beta icons (back\/forward, refresh, search icon) present in the Explorer windows and the Start menu. -- +++$+++ I understand that you removed the reference from a May 2006 blog, but I think it was unneccessary to remove my entire edit and call it inaccurate. It ''is'' accurate information, as properly referenced in Paul Thurrott's review. You can also see in the screenshot of Windows Classic in the same Windows Vista article, there are some old beta icons (back/forward, refresh, search icon) present in the Explorer windows and the Start menu. --[[User:Samvscat|Samvscat]] 03:58, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
275975 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275974 +++$+++ 275974 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.173531000E09 +++$+++ I looked at Paul Thurrott's review. It says nothing about the iconography of Windows Classic.  It says nothing about it being \"unfinished\" or \"unpolished\".  Quit making shit up and stuffing it in the mouths of others.  That's not acceptable on Wikipedia.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : I looked at Paul Thurrott's review. It says nothing about the iconography of Windows Classic.  It says nothing about it being "unfinished" or "unpolished".  Quit making shit up and stuffing it in the mouths of others.  That's not acceptable on Wikipedia.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 04:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
275976 +++$+++ Samvscat +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275974 +++$+++ 275975 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.173532980E09 +++$+++ What warrants that type of nasty response? I get attacked like that and I'm supposed to regard you as offering some kind of be-all, end-all opinion? Regardless, I can re-add my edit using a quote of Thurrott's exact words, although I have a feeling you'll revert that too because it doesn't reflect your opinion of what should be in the article. -- +++$+++ :: What warrants that type of nasty response? I get attacked like that and I'm supposed to regard you as offering some kind of be-all, end-all opinion? Regardless, I can re-add my edit using a quote of Thurrott's exact words, although I have a feeling you'll revert that too because it doesn't reflect your opinion of what should be in the article. --[[User:Samvscat|Samvscat]] 05:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
275977 +++$+++ Samvscat +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275974 +++$+++ 275975 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.173533820E09 +++$+++ I added a new edit; if you choose to revert it, I won't bother to attempt again. -- +++$+++ ::I added a new edit; if you choose to revert it, I won't bother to attempt again. --[[User:Samvscat|Samvscat]] 05:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
275978 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275974 +++$+++ 275977 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.173535320E09 +++$+++ Thanks... That's a hundred times better than your original submission.  I won't remove it.  I'm a strong proponent of razor-sharp accuracy in [[Wikipedia:Attribution]], because anything short of that makes Wikipedia appear shoddy and subject to opinioneering from individual editors, rather than a dispassionate collation and summation of knowledge. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::: Thanks... That's a hundred times better than your original submission.  I won't remove it.  I'm a strong proponent of razor-sharp accuracy in [[Wikipedia:Attribution]], because anything short of that makes Wikipedia appear shoddy and subject to opinioneering from individual editors, rather than a dispassionate collation and summation of knowledge. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 06:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
275979 +++$+++ Samvscat +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275974 +++$+++ 275978 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 06:08:00 +++$+++ 1.173535680E09 +++$+++ That's good to hear. Thank you for following [[Wikipedia:Civility]] this time in your response to me. -- +++$+++ :::: That's good to hear. Thank you for following [[Wikipedia:Civility]] this time in your response to me. --[[User:Samvscat|Samvscat]] 06:08, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

526593 +++$+++ Cryptonymius +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.173520980E09 +++$+++ \"Please do not add the Corporate crime category to companies\/corporations for which there is not corresponding, verified information in the article.\"  More details please.   +++$+++ "Please do not add the Corporate crime category to companies/corporations for which there is not corresponding, verified information in the article."  More details please.  [[User:Cryptonymius|Cryptonymius]] 02:03, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
526594 +++$+++ Cryptonymius +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526593 +++$+++ 526593 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.173521340E09 +++$+++ shell corporations are used for (among other things) tax evasion which is a crime and therefore relevant to the category of corporate crime which I'm trying to build up. And regarding Exxon-Mobile:  In 2003, the Office of Foreign Assets Control reported that ExxonMobil engaged in illegal trade with Sudan and along with dozens of other companies settled with the United States government for $50,000.[15]   And I would call that corporate crime.   +++$+++ :shell corporations are used for (among other things) tax evasion which is a crime and therefore relevant to the category of corporate crime which I'm trying to build up. And regarding Exxon-Mobile:  In 2003, the Office of Foreign Assets Control reported that ExxonMobil engaged in illegal trade with Sudan and along with dozens of other companies settled with the United States government for $50,000.[15]   And I would call that corporate crime.  [[User:Cryptonymius|Cryptonymius]] 02:09, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
526595 +++$+++ Cryptonymius +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526593 +++$+++ 526594 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.173522720E09 +++$+++ Yes on shell corps.  On the Exxon issue, I agree there are criminal codes, and there are other forms of law, but the category description only refers to \"illegal activities\" and it doesn't specify that a corporation or upper management must necessarily be indicted for violations of a penal or criminal code and in the Exxon article and the citations it appears that laws were broken and in the general sense of the word that would appear to be a crime and therefore relevant to Corporate Crime, I would think.   +++$+++ ::Yes on shell corps.  On the Exxon issue, I agree there are criminal codes, and there are other forms of law, but the category description only refers to "illegal activities" and it doesn't specify that a corporation or upper management must necessarily be indicted for violations of a penal or criminal code and in the Exxon article and the citations it appears that laws were broken and in the general sense of the word that would appear to be a crime and therefore relevant to Corporate Crime, I would think.  [[User:Cryptonymius|Cryptonymius]] 02:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

570284 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570284 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-29 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.209515700E09 +++$+++ David, is it all right to start converting boxes to the {{tl|imbox}} format, or should I wait until work on the template is done to reduce server load?  +++$+++ David, is it all right to start converting boxes to the {{tl|imbox}} format, or should I wait until work on the template is done to reduce server load? [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 17:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
570285 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570284 +++$+++ 570284 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.209517080E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 17:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
570286 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570284 +++$+++ 570285 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.209517260E09 +++$+++ Sure, I'm in no rush. God knows there is plenty of image work to be done aside from this, and it's worth waiting to make sure it's done right. Please let me know if there is anything I can do.  +++$+++ ::Sure, I'm in no rush. God knows there is plenty of image work to be done aside from this, and it's worth waiting to make sure it's done right. Please let me know if there is anything I can do. [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 18:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
570287 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570284 +++$+++ 570286 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.209518160E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 18:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
570288 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570284 +++$+++ 570287 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.209520200E09 +++$+++ Oh, by all means take my signature out of there. I only thought of the name and wanted to \"reserve\" it, you're doing all the work. I guess another thing I can do is to start drafting a proposed MoS page for image boxes, and to start compiling a list of templates to be converted. (This will be a job, as the image templates are not well-organized right now.) I also have to cross-check the templates for compatibility with the Commons versions to ensure they're not \"lost\" when images are transferred to Commons by bots. I'll also check to make sure there are no categories of image templates that won't fit into the organization scheme we have now (and might possibly need a new class) - nothing comes to mind right now but you never know.  +++$+++ ::::Oh, by all means take my signature out of there. I only thought of the name and wanted to "reserve" it, you're doing all the work. I guess another thing I can do is to start drafting a proposed MoS page for image boxes, and to start compiling a list of templates to be converted. (This will be a job, as the image templates are not well-organized right now.) I also have to cross-check the templates for compatibility with the Commons versions to ensure they're not "lost" when images are transferred to Commons by bots. I'll also check to make sure there are no categories of image templates that won't fit into the organization scheme we have now (and might possibly need a new class) - nothing comes to mind right now but you never know. [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 18:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
570289 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570284 +++$+++ 570288 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.209522780E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 19:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
570290 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570284 +++$+++ 570289 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.209523200E09 +++$+++ I think [[Wikipedia:Image message boxes]] and [[Wikipedia:Category message boxes]] is the way to go...and, yes, 'catbox' is funnier than 'cambox'. :)  +++$+++ ::::::I think [[Wikipedia:Image message boxes]] and [[Wikipedia:Category message boxes]] is the way to go...and, yes, 'catbox' is funnier than 'cambox'. :) [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 19:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

538123 +++$+++ Ernst Stavro Blofeld +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538123 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.168643280E09 +++$+++ I will gradually add it to the other images I wan't aware the full rationale was needed I presumed the brief and the licensing tag was enough. I am now over half way of covering the entire series of randall and hopkirk and I beleive one key image of each episode aside from the title is an extremely useful asset.  +++$+++ I will gradually add it to the other images I wan't aware the full rationale was needed I presumed the brief and the licensing tag was enough. I am now over half way of covering the entire series of randall and hopkirk and I beleive one key image of each episode aside from the title is an extremely useful asset. [[User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld|Ernst Stavro Blofeld]] 15:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
538124 +++$+++ NAHID +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538123 +++$+++ 538123 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.168643820E09 +++$+++ Oh! I mistakenly wrote fair use rational on its descreption page while uploading this logo.  +++$+++ *Oh! I mistakenly wrote fair use rational on its descreption page while uploading this logo. [[User:NAHID|NAHID]] 15:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
538125 +++$+++ NAHID +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538123 +++$+++ 538123 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.168644480E09 +++$+++ There are lot of logos that doesn't have fair use rational. Has that tag been added only for this sentence ''fair use rational of SEU logo'' ?? Thank you  +++$+++ *There are lot of logos that doesn't have fair use rational. Has that tag been added only for this sentence ''fair use rational of SEU logo'' ?? Thank you [[User:NAHID|NAHID]] 15:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
538126 +++$+++ NAHID +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538123 +++$+++ 538123 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.168645800E09 +++$+++ But there are thousands of logo without a single rational. Is the problem with that sentence I mentioned avobe.  +++$+++ *But there are thousands of logo without a single rational. Is the problem with that sentence I mentioned avobe. [[User:NAHID|NAHID]] 15:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

275980 +++$+++ Jigs41793 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.173535020E09 +++$+++ Hi Warrens.  Your talk page is becoming very long for a long time. Can you please archive your talk page as now? Thank you! ''' +++$+++ Hi Warrens.  Your talk page is becoming very long for a long time. Can you please archive your talk page as now? Thank you! '''[[User:Jigs41793|<span style="color:black;background:gold">Jigs41793</span>]]''' [[User Talk:Jigs41793|<span style="color:white;background:black"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]]<span style="color:red;background:black">/</span>[[Special:Contributions/Jigs41793|<span style="color:white;background:black"><sub>contribs</sub></span>]] 05:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
275981 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275980 +++$+++ 275980 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.173535440E09 +++$+++ Holy moly, I did let it go for a bit too long, didn't I?  Thanks for the reminder!  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Holy moly, I did let it go for a bit too long, didn't I?  Thanks for the reminder!  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 06:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

13837 +++$+++ AgnosticPreachersKid +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-31 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.201825380E09 +++$+++ I went to Faith Christian Academy in Goldsboro. I know aloooot of agnostics and atheists that use to go to christian schools\/colleges...most of my friends from college won't step foot in a church.-- +++$+++ I went to Faith Christian Academy in Goldsboro. I know aloooot of agnostics and atheists that use to go to christian schools/colleges...most of my friends from college won't step foot in a church.--[[User:AgnosticPreachersKid|AgnosticPreachersKid]] ([[User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid|talk]]) 16:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
13838 +++$+++ AgnosticPreachersKid +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13837 +++$+++ 13837 +++$+++ 2008-02-01 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.201913400E09 +++$+++ I removed the brackets from the NCCSA because there is no article for them and it stands out in red. Are you planning on making an article?-- +++$+++ :I removed the brackets from the NCCSA because there is no article for them and it stands out in red. Are you planning on making an article?--[[User:AgnosticPreachersKid|AgnosticPreachersKid]] ([[User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid|talk]]) 16:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
13839 +++$+++ AgnosticPreachersKid +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13837 +++$+++ 13837 +++$+++ 2008-02-02 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.201959660E09 +++$+++ Someone tagged the article with notability and pov. I removed the POV, but you need to add references in the article in order for the notability tag to be removed.-- +++$+++ :Someone tagged the article with notability and pov. I removed the POV, but you need to add references in the article in order for the notability tag to be removed.--[[User:AgnosticPreachersKid|AgnosticPreachersKid]] ([[User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid|talk]]) 05:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
13840 +++$+++ AgnosticPreachersKid +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13837 +++$+++ 13839 +++$+++ 2008-02-02 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.201960080E09 +++$+++ I'd suggest looking over the info you're copying and pasting from the school's website. Remove the POV material before adding the info to the article to avoid having the article tagged for POV. Also, I'd suggest doing this on the other articles like Raleigh Christian Academy, etc.-- +++$+++ ::I'd suggest looking over the info you're copying and pasting from the school's website. Remove the POV material before adding the info to the article to avoid having the article tagged for POV. Also, I'd suggest doing this on the other articles like Raleigh Christian Academy, etc.--[[User:AgnosticPreachersKid|AgnosticPreachersKid]] ([[User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid|talk]]) 05:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

538127 +++$+++ NAHID +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.168647780E09 +++$+++ I've added the rational. Another thing the educational logos that are uploaded before (but after may 2006) do I need to mention their rational??  +++$+++ I've added the rational. Another thing the educational logos that are uploaded before (but after may 2006) do I need to mention their rational?? [[User:NAHID|NAHID]] 16:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
538128 +++$+++ NAHID +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538127 +++$+++ 538127 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.168648440E09 +++$+++ But even featured article (educational) logo  doesn't have rational. I can't remember their name though. Why they are get nominated? Thanks anyway  +++$+++ *But even featured article (educational) logo  doesn't have rational. I can't remember their name though. Why they are get nominated? Thanks anyway [[User:NAHID|NAHID]] 16:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
538129 +++$+++ NAHID +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538127 +++$+++ 538127 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.168649040E09 +++$+++ One more thing, is there any problem if I writedown the same fair rational sentences on logos that are related to university or any organizations if I were the uploader? Thank you  +++$+++ *One more thing, is there any problem if I writedown the same fair rational sentences on logos that are related to university or any organizations if I were the uploader? Thank you [[User:NAHID|NAHID]] 16:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
538130 +++$+++ NAHID +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538127 +++$+++ 538127 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.168652700E09 +++$+++ Could you please mention some image deletion tags? I want to delete some images that falls in same category and they refer same subject at a time. For example, I uploaded some logos of an university. One of them is real and others are fake \/ created by someone else. Thank you  +++$+++ *Could you please mention some image deletion tags? I want to delete some images that falls in same category and they refer same subject at a time. For example, I uploaded some logos of an university. One of them is real and others are fake / created by someone else. Thank you [[User:NAHID|NAHID]] 17:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
538131 +++$+++ NAHID +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538127 +++$+++ 538127 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.168654260E09 +++$+++ Oh, I uploaded a new version of an image. But why its previous image is still exist? I don't need that. Thank you  +++$+++ *Oh, I uploaded a new version of an image. But why its previous image is still exist? I don't need that. Thank you [[User:NAHID|NAHID]] 18:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

275984 +++$+++ Meteoroid +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275984 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.173598440E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ —[[User:Meteoroid|Meteoroid]] [[User talk:Meteoroid|»]] 23:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
275985 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275984 +++$+++ 275984 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.173603300E09 +++$+++ Hey... thanks for note.  Yeah, I've been keeping an eye on it.  Hopefully the editor who got blocked for revert warring will learn from the experience and not pursue the issue any further... we've all got better things to do. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Hey... thanks for note.  Yeah, I've been keeping an eye on it.  Hopefully the editor who got blocked for revert warring will learn from the experience and not pursue the issue any further... we've all got better things to do. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 00:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
275986 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275984 +++$+++ 275985 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.173717060E09 +++$+++ He's back to reverting it to his version. Sigh... \u2014  +++$+++ :: He's back to reverting it to his version. Sigh... — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 09:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
275987 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275984 +++$+++ 275986 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.173717780E09 +++$+++ ...he does have a point, though. In a way. We have to somehow make the screenshots not as cold. For example, showing an empty Microsoft Word window doesn't really get anything across. I think [[User:Longzheng|Long Zheng]] had a nice screenshot of it (some formatted text generated using =rand()), but I believe it got deleted. We have to somehow make the screenshot more aesthetically pleasing. Any ideas? \u2014  +++$+++ ::: ...he does have a point, though. In a way. We have to somehow make the screenshots not as cold. For example, showing an empty Microsoft Word window doesn't really get anything across. I think [[User:Longzheng|Long Zheng]] had a nice screenshot of it (some formatted text generated using =rand()), but I believe it got deleted. We have to somehow make the screenshot more aesthetically pleasing. Any ideas? — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 09:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
275988 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275984 +++$+++ 275987 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.173717900E09 +++$+++ The screenshot is still there. This is what I mean: [[:Image:Officeword2007.png]]. \u2014  +++$+++ :::: The screenshot is still there. This is what I mean: [[:Image:Officeword2007.png]]. — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 09:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
275989 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275984 +++$+++ 275986 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.173718140E09 +++$+++ Hmmm.  We could just replicate the Windows Vista version of the image, which shows the media library.  That'll always look more interesting than an empty player window. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::: Hmmm.  We could just replicate the Windows Vista version of the image, which shows the media library.  That'll always look more interesting than an empty player window. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 09:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
275990 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275984 +++$+++ 275989 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.173718800E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I was considering that, too. Just something worth of mention, though:  look at the [[iTunes]] page. They're using Fall Out Boy album art. Should it be in use on that page? \u2014  +++$+++ :::: Yeah, I was considering that, too. Just something worth of mention, though:  look at the [[iTunes]] page. They're using Fall Out Boy album art. Should it be in use on that page? — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 10:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
275991 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275984 +++$+++ 275990 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.173719640E09 +++$+++ I think the closest we could get to \"ideal\" fair use for WMP, iTunes etc. screenshots, would be to get some Creative Commons-licensed albums (artwork + tracks) and use that.  That's not a trivial undertaking, and also not very easy to maintain in the years to come.  I'm not really up on where one could go to find such music.  As long as the album art itself is small (like it is in WMP11 album view), and as long as the fair-use rationales for each image is clear about it, we should be fine.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::::: I think the closest we could get to "ideal" fair use for WMP, iTunes etc. screenshots, would be to get some Creative Commons-licensed albums (artwork + tracks) and use that.  That's not a trivial undertaking, and also not very easy to maintain in the years to come.  I'm not really up on where one could go to find such music.  As long as the album art itself is small (like it is in WMP11 album view), and as long as the fair-use rationales for each image is clear about it, we should be fine.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 10:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

13841 +++$+++ Beetstra +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.205377260E09 +++$+++ That link may have some interest here and there, but adding the same link to a large number of pages, especially where the info on the page linked to is not directly linked to the subject (it is an overview page of the archives), is certainly not according to our [[WP:EL|external links guideline]].  Please stop.  -- +++$+++ That link may have some interest here and there, but adding the same link to a large number of pages, especially where the info on the page linked to is not directly linked to the subject (it is an overview page of the archives), is certainly not according to our [[WP:EL|external links guideline]].  Please stop.  --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 20:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
13842 +++$+++ Beetstra +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13841 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.205378220E09 +++$+++ When I click the link I don't get any direct information, I have to click on to find more about the subject (I refer to [[WP:EL#Links normally to be avoided]], point 14).  Indeed, there are no references in the document, but there must be directly relevant information, either on that server, or on news servers from the area.  Hope this explains.  -- +++$+++ ::When I click the link I don't get any direct information, I have to click on to find more about the subject (I refer to [[WP:EL#Links normally to be avoided]], point 14).  Indeed, there are no references in the document, but there must be directly relevant information, either on that server, or on news servers from the area.  Hope this explains.  --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 20:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
13843 +++$+++ Beetstra +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13841 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.205379300E09 +++$+++ That sounds like a good plan, though it might even be better to use it as a citation, see [[WP:CITE]] and [[WP:FOOT]].  Then it really attributes information in the document.  Hope this helps, happy editing!  -- +++$+++ ::That sounds like a good plan, though it might even be better to use it as a citation, see [[WP:CITE]] and [[WP:FOOT]].  Then it really attributes information in the document.  Hope this helps, happy editing!  --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 20:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

538133 +++$+++ Pradiptaray +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538133 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-13 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.168682160E09 +++$+++ Sorry the licence shoudl have been cc 2.0 I have changed it accordingly.  +++$+++ Sorry the licence shoudl have been cc 2.0 I have changed it accordingly. [[User:Pradiptaray|ray]] 01:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
538134 +++$+++ Pradiptaray +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538133 +++$+++ 538133 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.168693800E09 +++$+++ Oh okay. I'll remove the link as well, and maybe just have an external link to the photo. Thanks for pointing this out. Cheers. [[User:141.151.164.149|141.151.164.149]] 05:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC) oops thats me  +++$+++ : Oh okay. I'll remove the link as well, and maybe just have an external link to the photo. Thanks for pointing this out. Cheers. [[User:141.151.164.149|141.151.164.149]] 05:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC) oops thats me [[User:Pradiptaray|ray]] 05:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

89689 +++$+++ Scottandrewhutchins +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-02 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.183436880E09 +++$+++ This is not an accurate statement.  Simple as that. -- +++$+++ This is not an accurate statement.  Simple as that. --[[User:Scottandrewhutchins|Scottandrewhutchins]] 21:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
89690 +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89689 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.183437420E09 +++$+++ Are you deliberately ignoring my point?  Stephen Jones claims that the name of the movie is Meet Frankenstein when no other writer (to my knowledge) refers to the film in that way.  Kim Newman (and a few others) refer to \"Witchfinder General\" as \"Matthew Hopkins - Witchfinder General\".  Simply because ''they argue'' that those are the onscreen titles does not magically make those the actual titles of the films.  The same is true of Corman's film...the most common title is \"The Pit and the Pendulum\".  Just because some people, including you, argue otherwise does not make it so. Why are you having such difficulty with this?- +++$+++ ::::::Are you deliberately ignoring my point?  Stephen Jones claims that the name of the movie is Meet Frankenstein when no other writer (to my knowledge) refers to the film in that way.  Kim Newman (and a few others) refer to "Witchfinder General" as "Matthew Hopkins - Witchfinder General".  Simply because ''they argue'' that those are the onscreen titles does not magically make those the actual titles of the films.  The same is true of Corman's film...the most common title is "The Pit and the Pendulum".  Just because some people, including you, argue otherwise does not make it so. Why are you having such difficulty with this?-[[User:Hal Raglan|Hal Raglan]] 21:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
89691 +++$+++ Scottandrewhutchins +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89689 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.183508640E09 +++$+++ \"Most common\" and \"correct\" are two different things. -- +++$+++ ::::::::"Most common" and "correct" are two different things. --[[User:Scottandrewhutchins|Scottandrewhutchins]] 17:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
89692 +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89689 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.183511160E09 +++$+++ From the wikipedia film guidelines:  \"Names of articles should be '''the most commonly used title''' for the following reasons: We want to maximize the likelihood of being listed in external search engines, thereby attracting more people to Wikipedia.\"- +++$+++ :::::::::From the wikipedia film guidelines:  "Names of articles should be '''the most commonly used title''' for the following reasons: We want to maximize the likelihood of being listed in external search engines, thereby attracting more people to Wikipedia."-[[User:Hal Raglan|Hal Raglan]] 18:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

13848 +++$+++ Thejerm +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13848 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-24 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.206428280E09 +++$+++ Why do keep reverting to a poorer quality image? please stop.  -- +++$+++ Why do keep reverting to a poorer quality image? please stop.  --[[User:Thejerm|Jerm]]  (<sup>[[User_talk:Thejerm|Talk]]</sup>/ <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Thejerm|Contrib]]</sub>) 23:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
13849 +++$+++ 130.218.10.1 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13848 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.206491940E09 +++$+++ If you read the document that the image came from it is supposed to be black.  Wikipedia is not for advertisement so your argument that it is \"more aesthetically pleasing\" is incorrect. --[[Special:Contributions\/130.218.10.1|130.218.10.1]] ( +++$+++ ::If you read the document that the image came from it is supposed to be black.  Wikipedia is not for advertisement so your argument that it is "more aesthetically pleasing" is incorrect. --[[Special:Contributions/130.218.10.1|130.218.10.1]] ([[User talk:130.218.10.1|talk]]) 17:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

264452 +++$+++ Rhsatrhs +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-08 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.202464500E09 +++$+++ Thanks.    +++$+++ Thanks.   [[User:Rhsatrhs|Rhsatrhs]] ([[User talk:Rhsatrhs|talk]]) 01:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
264453 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264452 +++$+++ 264452 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.202497320E09 +++$+++ So, the claim that remains, and the one you removed, is associated with Sonenberg in the ''Classic Albums'' documentary, further details of which can be found on the IMDb.  +++$+++ :So, the claim that remains, and the one you removed, is associated with Sonenberg in the ''Classic Albums'' documentary, further details of which can be found on the IMDb. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

538138 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538138 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.168927560E09 +++$+++ If you're talking about [[:Image:Adrian Peterson OUvsBSU.jpg]] about the license being changed, then I don't think they can \"take back\" the release of a license. Especially, if we used it under that license. I am probably not fully qualified to answer this, so you should seek a second opinion. I know that a GFDL license can't be revoked, once it's out there it's out there; I would think CC licenses would be the same. You should ask for help at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. The problem them comes on how to verify the image license was changed? On commons, an admin will come along for some images and state that \"yes, this image was under this license on this date\" so if they change the license or it gets deleted somehow, the image can still say since there are two people (one an admin, very trusted) saying the license is such. I've seen this happen to some of the images I uploaded at commons and can find one for an example if you'd like. -- +++$+++ If you're talking about [[:Image:Adrian Peterson OUvsBSU.jpg]] about the license being changed, then I don't think they can "take back" the release of a license. Especially, if we used it under that license. I am probably not fully qualified to answer this, so you should seek a second opinion. I know that a GFDL license can't be revoked, once it's out there it's out there; I would think CC licenses would be the same. You should ask for help at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. The problem them comes on how to verify the image license was changed? On commons, an admin will come along for some images and state that "yes, this image was under this license on this date" so if they change the license or it gets deleted somehow, the image can still say since there are two people (one an admin, very trusted) saying the license is such. I've seen this happen to some of the images I uploaded at commons and can find one for an example if you'd like. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 22:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
538139 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538138 +++$+++ 538138 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.168930560E09 +++$+++ I have moved the image to commons: [[:commons:Image:Adrian Peterson OUvsBSU.jpg]] and marked the image here as replaceable as the same image exists on commons. I've asked on IRC for an admin to verify it on commons and mark it with the tag that they approved\/agreed with the license. Once the image is deleted here at wikipedia, the commons will automatically show up, and once admin approved at commons, it will forever be okay to use. (I had to move it to commons because Wikipedia doesn't have anything like that.) -- +++$+++ :I have moved the image to commons: [[:commons:Image:Adrian Peterson OUvsBSU.jpg]] and marked the image here as replaceable as the same image exists on commons. I've asked on IRC for an admin to verify it on commons and mark it with the tag that they approved/agreed with the license. Once the image is deleted here at wikipedia, the commons will automatically show up, and once admin approved at commons, it will forever be okay to use. (I had to move it to commons because Wikipedia doesn't have anything like that.) --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 22:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

275995 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-15 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.173943740E09 +++$+++ Do you think [[Windows 200x|this article]] should be nominated for deletion? I think all of the information is mentioned in the [[Windows NT]] article. \u2014  +++$+++ Do you think [[Windows 200x|this article]] should be nominated for deletion? I think all of the information is mentioned in the [[Windows NT]] article. — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]] <sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 00:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
275996 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275995 +++$+++ 275995 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.173961140E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure.  We have an article on [[Windows 9x]]. Then again, there isn't another term that adequately describes that particular set of operating systems, whereas 200x describes a subset of Windows NT.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : I'm not sure.  We have an article on [[Windows 9x]]. Then again, there isn't another term that adequately describes that particular set of operating systems, whereas 200x describes a subset of Windows NT.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 05:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
275997 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275995 +++$+++ 275996 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.173962400E09 +++$+++ Does anyone even call it the 200x series? I think everyone who refers to the NT\/2000\/XP\/2003... class of OSs refer to it as the NT series. So may be this should be a redirect to the NT article (for the NT series). Otherwise we will end up with an article every decade. :P Anyways, in the ''Release History'' table in [[Windows NT]] article, where do you think Home Server fits in? A separate row or as a version of Server 2003? My vote would be for a separate row. --<span class=\"mysigtalk\" style=\"padding: 0.1em; border: 1px solid #F22; background-color: #Fda; color: #000;\">'' +++$+++ ::Does anyone even call it the 200x series? I think everyone who refers to the NT/2000/XP/2003... class of OSs refer to it as the NT series. So may be this should be a redirect to the NT article (for the NT series). Otherwise we will end up with an article every decade. :P Anyways, in the ''Release History'' table in [[Windows NT]] article, where do you think Home Server fits in? A separate row or as a version of Server 2003? My vote would be for a separate row. --<span class="mysigtalk" style="padding: 0.1em; border: 1px solid #F22; background-color: #Fda; color: #000;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]''</span><sup>''[[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="white" style="background: #ff6633;">talk</font>]]''</sup> 05:40, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
275998 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275995 +++$+++ 275997 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.173963060E09 +++$+++ I did some poking around when I saw the article appear.  The term is floating around on various vendor web sites and discussion grounds, as well as (interestingly enough) on [http:\/\/support.microsoft.com\/kb\/555741 MSKB 555741], which was published recently.  That's why I'm not sure of what to think of it... the term might gain some extra traction after Server Longhorn's final name is released, too.  Maybe the answer is to have a paragraph in [[Windows NT]] about the term, and have [[Windows 200x]] redirect to that?  As for the WHS thing, a separate line seems appropriate to me.  We have a separate one for FLP already, so the precedent is there.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::: I did some poking around when I saw the article appear.  The term is floating around on various vendor web sites and discussion grounds, as well as (interestingly enough) on [http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555741 MSKB 555741], which was published recently.  That's why I'm not sure of what to think of it... the term might gain some extra traction after Server Longhorn's final name is released, too.  Maybe the answer is to have a paragraph in [[Windows NT]] about the term, and have [[Windows 200x]] redirect to that?  As for the WHS thing, a separate line seems appropriate to me.  We have a separate one for FLP already, so the precedent is there.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 05:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
275999 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275995 +++$+++ 275998 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.173964020E09 +++$+++ Mentioning it in the NT article and redir to the para seems a good idea. Also, I am keenly interested in starting the [[DRM features in Windows Vista]] article, as you had sometime back. But I am afraid, once it gets considerable content, it will probably become the most vandalized article in Wikipedia. What say? Lets create it? --<span class=\"mysigtalk\" style=\"padding: 0.1em; border: 1px solid #F22; background-color: #Fda; color: #000;\">'' +++$+++ :::: Mentioning it in the NT article and redir to the para seems a good idea. Also, I am keenly interested in starting the [[DRM features in Windows Vista]] article, as you had sometime back. But I am afraid, once it gets considerable content, it will probably become the most vandalized article in Wikipedia. What say? Lets create it? --<span class="mysigtalk" style="padding: 0.1em; border: 1px solid #F22; background-color: #Fda; color: #000;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]''</span><sup>''[[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="white" style="background: #ff6633;">talk</font>]]''</sup> 06:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
276000 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275995 +++$+++ 275999 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.173965940E09 +++$+++ Hmm, yeah.  We could put together something decent there, but the danger in doing so is that we might end up duplicating a lot of what would rightly belong in [[Protected Media Path]] or [[Windows Rights Management Services]].  How it would interact with [[Criticism of Windows Vista]] should be considered, too.  I don't like acronyms in titles, though, and I'm really hesitant to call such capabilities \"features\". :)  how about simply [[Digital Rights Management in Windows Vista]]? <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::::: Hmm, yeah.  We could put together something decent there, but the danger in doing so is that we might end up duplicating a lot of what would rightly belong in [[Protected Media Path]] or [[Windows Rights Management Services]].  How it would interact with [[Criticism of Windows Vista]] should be considered, too.  I don't like acronyms in titles, though, and I'm really hesitant to call such capabilities "features". :)  how about simply [[Digital Rights Management in Windows Vista]]? <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 06:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
276001 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 275995 +++$+++ 276000 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.173968460E09 +++$+++ Thats better. If we focus on detailed technical discussion then we can get unique content in. We could provide some description of Protected Media Path and Rights Management Services in Vista and link to the main articles. As for criticism, we could keep the article purely technical and all criticisms will be redirected to the criticism articles. Other DRM technologies will also be given descent coverage. Plus, how it fits with other technologies like [[Intel LaGrande]] will also be covered. Or may be make the article a bit more generic and include content security features such as bitlocker and the Crypto NexGen subsystem as well. --<span class=\"mysigtalk\" style=\"padding: 0.1em; border: 1px solid #F22; background-color: #Fda; color: #000;\">'' +++$+++ :::::: Thats better. If we focus on detailed technical discussion then we can get unique content in. We could provide some description of Protected Media Path and Rights Management Services in Vista and link to the main articles. As for criticism, we could keep the article purely technical and all criticisms will be redirected to the criticism articles. Other DRM technologies will also be given descent coverage. Plus, how it fits with other technologies like [[Intel LaGrande]] will also be covered. Or may be make the article a bit more generic and include content security features such as bitlocker and the Crypto NexGen subsystem as well. --<span class="mysigtalk" style="padding: 0.1em; border: 1px solid #F22; background-color: #Fda; color: #000;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]''</span><sup>''[[User talk:Soumyasch|<font color="white" style="background: #ff6633;">talk</font>]]''</sup> 07:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

455745 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ AniMate +++$+++ 455745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-24 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.308969900E09 +++$+++ Hey, AniMate. It's clear that this user needs to be blocked. Preferably for good. All the warnings in the world haven't helped to stop this user from violating [[WP:COMMONNAME]], and I'm beyond tired of warning and reminding him\/her.  +++$+++ Hey, AniMate. It's clear that this user needs to be blocked. Preferably for good. All the warnings in the world haven't helped to stop this user from violating [[WP:COMMONNAME]], and I'm beyond tired of warning and reminding him/her. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 19:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
455746 +++$+++ AniMate +++$+++ AniMate +++$+++ 455745 +++$+++ 455745 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.308971580E09 +++$+++ I'm sorely tempted. I'm probably [[WP:INVOLVED]], but I'll support you if you take this to a noticeboard. The last time that AugustAugust communicated with another user was 2009' so ...  +++$+++ :I'm sorely tempted. I'm probably [[WP:INVOLVED]], but I'll support you if you take this to a noticeboard. The last time that AugustAugust communicated with another user was 2009' so ... [[User talk:AniMate|AniMate]] 20:13, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
455747 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ AniMate +++$+++ 455745 +++$+++ 455746 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.308973020E09 +++$+++ You are one of the administrators who warned this user before. So of course you are involved in that way. Plenty of administrators have warned users before blocking them. So I don't see how you'd be in violation. The policy states: \"''One important caveat is that an administrator who has interacted with an editor or topic area purely in an administrative role, or whose prior involvement are minor or obvious edits which do not speak to bias, is not involved and is not prevented from acting in an administrative capacity in relation to that editor or topic area.''\" And from what I have seen, you acted purely in an administrative role toward this user. But if you are uncomfortable blocking him or her, even for a few months or whatever, I understand. Better to be safe than sorry. Plus, this one would likely start back up again after the block anyway. And I have no doubt that if permanently blocked, he or she would just create another account.  +++$+++ ::You are one of the administrators who warned this user before. So of course you are involved in that way. Plenty of administrators have warned users before blocking them. So I don't see how you'd be in violation. The policy states: "''One important caveat is that an administrator who has interacted with an editor or topic area purely in an administrative role, or whose prior involvement are minor or obvious edits which do not speak to bias, is not involved and is not prevented from acting in an administrative capacity in relation to that editor or topic area.''" And from what I have seen, you acted purely in an administrative role toward this user. But if you are uncomfortable blocking him or her, even for a few months or whatever, I understand. Better to be safe than sorry. Plus, this one would likely start back up again after the block anyway. And I have no doubt that if permanently blocked, he or she would just create another account. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 20:37, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
455748 +++$+++ AniMate +++$+++ AniMate +++$+++ 455745 +++$+++ 455747 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.308973740E09 +++$+++ I'm involved in the same editing area and have reverted the users edits. I am involved here and AugustAugust and I have had testy talk page interactions. Again, I'm sorely tempted but won't be blocking.  +++$+++ :::I'm involved in the same editing area and have reverted the users edits. I am involved here and AugustAugust and I have had testy talk page interactions. Again, I'm sorely tempted but won't be blocking. [[User talk:AniMate|AniMate]] 20:49, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
455749 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ AniMate +++$+++ 455745 +++$+++ 455748 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.308974400E09 +++$+++ LOL, you were right to revert this user's edits on the page moves, as any administrator would have been justified in doing so. But maybe you mean you've reverted other edits made by the user? I did take a look at AugustAugust's talk page and saw an old discussion where you weighed in briefly behind me, so I suppose I understand what you mean on that (though I still view that involvement as minor as well, and say that you were acting without bias). No need to apologize. Like I stated, better to be safe than sorry. I'll probably report him or her to the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents]] (as suggested in my previous edit summary) if he or she acts again, which will no doubt happen (LOL).  +++$+++ ::::LOL, you were right to revert this user's edits on the page moves, as any administrator would have been justified in doing so. But maybe you mean you've reverted other edits made by the user? I did take a look at AugustAugust's talk page and saw an old discussion where you weighed in briefly behind me, so I suppose I understand what you mean on that (though I still view that involvement as minor as well, and say that you were acting without bias). No need to apologize. Like I stated, better to be safe than sorry. I'll probably report him or her to the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] (as suggested in my previous edit summary) if he or she acts again, which will no doubt happen (LOL). [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 21:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

538141 +++$+++ Tlmclain +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538141 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-16 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.169017260E09 +++$+++ NMajdan:  I was in the process of writing you about this when I saw your latest change.  Yes, it is only a redirect to [[Georgia Bulldogs football under Kid Woodruff#1927 Season]].  I think it is a NA, but don't know if the banner needs to be there at all.  Since there was already a banner there, I thought I'd leave it.  Do you know if a custom has been developed for redirects?-- +++$+++ NMajdan:  I was in the process of writing you about this when I saw your latest change.  Yes, it is only a redirect to [[Georgia Bulldogs football under Kid Woodruff#1927 Season]].  I think it is a NA, but don't know if the banner needs to be there at all.  Since there was already a banner there, I thought I'd leave it.  Do you know if a custom has been developed for redirects?--[[User:Tlmclain|Tlmclain ]] | [[User talk:Tlmclain|Talk]] 23:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
538142 +++$+++ Tlmclain +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538141 +++$+++ 538141 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.169017980E09 +++$+++ I've taken the banner off.  With respect to those Auburn pages, they're on my list to merge, I just don't know when - I keep coming up with new projects without finishing ones I've started  . . . . . -- +++$+++ :I've taken the banner off.  With respect to those Auburn pages, they're on my list to merge, I just don't know when - I keep coming up with new projects without finishing ones I've started  . . . . . --[[User:Tlmclain|Tlmclain ]] | [[User talk:Tlmclain|Talk]] 23:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

13854 +++$+++ Newshounddog +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13854 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-19 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.213867980E09 +++$+++ You have been accused of [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]]. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Rreagan007]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry\/Notes for the suspect|notes for the suspect]] before editing the evidence page.  +++$+++ You have been accused of [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]]. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Rreagan007]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect|notes for the suspect]] before editing the evidence page. [[User:Newshounddog|Newshounddog]] ([[User talk:Newshounddog|talk]]) 02:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
13855 +++$+++ Shalom Yechiel +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13854 +++$+++ 13854 +++$+++ 2008-06-19 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.213870560E09 +++$+++ Please respond to my request for clarification at the sockpuppet case page: [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Rreagan007]].  +++$+++ :Please respond to my request for clarification at the sockpuppet case page: [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Rreagan007]]. [[User:Shalom Yechiel|Yechiel]] ([[User talk:Shalom Yechiel|Shalom]]) 03:16, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
13856 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13854 +++$+++ 13855 +++$+++ 2008-06-19 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.213912860E09 +++$+++ I do not deny that I sometimes edit from that IP address instead of logging in, but I do not do that for bad purposes. Usually I either just forget to log in, or I have several different browsers open and I'm logged in on 1 browser and just don't remember to log into the other 1. I have looked at the talk page for the IP address and I do see the negitive stuff you are referring to. But none of the vandalism from this IP address was done by me. I did not even start editing wikipedia articles at all until January of this year, and the vandalism I saw was all from before that. I'm also not familiar with how IP addresses work, but it might be possible that more than 1 person shares this IP address. Again, I have never intentionally vandalised any wikipedia page, and none of the edits from this IP address could have been done by me before January 2008. If you have any questions about this for me please feel free to ask.  +++$+++ ::I do not deny that I sometimes edit from that IP address instead of logging in, but I do not do that for bad purposes. Usually I either just forget to log in, or I have several different browsers open and I'm logged in on 1 browser and just don't remember to log into the other 1. I have looked at the talk page for the IP address and I do see the negitive stuff you are referring to. But none of the vandalism from this IP address was done by me. I did not even start editing wikipedia articles at all until January of this year, and the vandalism I saw was all from before that. I'm also not familiar with how IP addresses work, but it might be possible that more than 1 person shares this IP address. Again, I have never intentionally vandalised any wikipedia page, and none of the edits from this IP address could have been done by me before January 2008. If you have any questions about this for me please feel free to ask. [[User:Rreagan007|Rreagan007]] ([[User talk:Rreagan007#top|talk]]) 15:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

13857 +++$+++ Shalom Yechiel +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-20 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.214021040E09 +++$+++ Please see my closing comments at [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Rreagan007]]. To clarify: if you want to stay logged in on multiple tabs or window when you edit, click on the \"remember me\" box when you login.  That automatically logs you in even on tabs you have not yet opened on that computer, and avoids the situation where you are logged in to Wikipedia on one window but logged out on another window.  +++$+++ Please see my closing comments at [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Rreagan007]]. To clarify: if you want to stay logged in on multiple tabs or window when you edit, click on the "remember me" box when you login.  That automatically logs you in even on tabs you have not yet opened on that computer, and avoids the situation where you are logged in to Wikipedia on one window but logged out on another window. [[User:Shalom Yechiel|Yechiel]] ([[User talk:Shalom Yechiel|Shalom]]) 21:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
13858 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13857 +++$+++ 13857 +++$+++ 2008-06-21 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.214103300E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I was just trying to help.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I was just trying to help. [[User:Rreagan007|Rreagan007]] ([[User talk:Rreagan007#top|talk]]) 19:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

538147 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.169112300E09 +++$+++ FYI, I've done some final cleanup (helped by another editor) and I have nominated [[Baby Gender Mentor]] for FA.  We'll see how it goes. Thanks again for your help.  Best,  +++$+++ FYI, I've done some final cleanup (helped by another editor) and I have nominated [[Baby Gender Mentor]] for FA.  We'll see how it goes. Thanks again for your help.  Best, [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 01:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
538148 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538147 +++$+++ 538147 +++$+++ 2007-01-22 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.169525520E09 +++$+++ The nomination is [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates#Baby Gender Mentor | here]] if you would like to comment.  +++$+++ :The nomination is [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates#Baby Gender Mentor | here]] if you would like to comment. [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 20:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

13861 +++$+++ RJHall +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13861 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-28 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.217283060E09 +++$+++ While I'm sure you meant well, your revisions to the image arrangement on the [[Earth]] page led to some issues on my browser. Aligning the image with the table resulted in an ugly displacement in my browser, so it was not an improvement. You also move the image showing the relative sizes of the planets out of the section where the size was being discussed. That was also unhelpful. I would greatly appreciate it if you could be more careful; this page has gone through a lot of massaging over time before it achieved a satisfactory look. Thank you.&mdash; +++$+++ While I'm sure you meant well, your revisions to the image arrangement on the [[Earth]] page led to some issues on my browser. Aligning the image with the table resulted in an ugly displacement in my browser, so it was not an improvement. You also move the image showing the relative sizes of the planets out of the section where the size was being discussed. That was also unhelpful. I would greatly appreciate it if you could be more careful; this page has gone through a lot of massaging over time before it achieved a satisfactory look. Thank you.&mdash;[[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 15:11, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
13862 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13861 +++$+++ 13861 +++$+++ 2008-07-28 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.217284260E09 +++$+++ Sorry for just jumping in like that and changing stuff around. I can see you've done a lot of work on astronomy pages and the Earth page in particular, so I will certainly defer to your judgment on this. However, the reason I tried to rearrange some of the images on the Earth page was because the page looked extremely haphazard in its arrangement, especially for a featured article. I know the article is very well written, but I still think having the 2 pictures and 2 tables in the arrangement they're in now does not look very good. Perhaps the pictures and tables could go on top of each other instead of side by side? I leave it for you to decide.  +++$+++ :Sorry for just jumping in like that and changing stuff around. I can see you've done a lot of work on astronomy pages and the Earth page in particular, so I will certainly defer to your judgment on this. However, the reason I tried to rearrange some of the images on the Earth page was because the page looked extremely haphazard in its arrangement, especially for a featured article. I know the article is very well written, but I still think having the 2 pictures and 2 tables in the arrangement they're in now does not look very good. Perhaps the pictures and tables could go on top of each other instead of side by side? I leave it for you to decide. [[User:Rreagan007|Rreagan007]] ([[User talk:Rreagan007|talk]]) 15:31, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
13863 +++$+++ RJHall +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13861 +++$+++ 13862 +++$+++ 2008-07-28 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.217284740E09 +++$+++ Yes it's been difficult to come up with an ideal arrangement that both keeps the material with the subject matter and still avoids collisions at differing widths, font settings and browser types. Many different arrangements have been attempted. Thanks.&mdash; +++$+++ ::Yes it's been difficult to come up with an ideal arrangement that both keeps the material with the subject matter and still avoids collisions at differing widths, font settings and browser types. Many different arrangements have been attempted. Thanks.&mdash;[[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 15:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

276006 +++$+++ SMcCandlish +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276006 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.174487760E09 +++$+++ Can you please reduce the incredible hugeness of your sig? It's very distracting on talk pages.  Something about 2\/3 the current size would do it. &mdash; <span style=\"font-family: Tahoma;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> +++$+++ Can you please reduce the incredible hugeness of your sig? It's very distracting on talk pages.  Something about 2/3 the current size would do it. &mdash; <span style="font-family: Tahoma;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">[[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]]</span> &#91;[[User_talk:SMcCandlish|talk]]&#93; &#91;[[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|contrib]]&#93;</span> <span style="color: #990000; font-weight: bold;">ツ</span> 07:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
276007 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276006 +++$+++ 276006 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.174507740E09 +++$+++ My sig length is 147 bytes and renders at 72x16 on Firefox on Vista, yours is 277 bytes and renders at about 200x16. Honestly, don't you have something better to do than be critical of other editors' signatures, when you yourself could be subject to the same criticism? <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : My sig length is 147 bytes and renders at 72x16 on Firefox on Vista, yours is 277 bytes and renders at about 200x16. Honestly, don't you have something better to do than be critical of other editors' signatures, when you yourself could be subject to the same criticism? <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 13:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
276008 +++$+++ SMcCandlish +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276006 +++$+++ 276007 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.174526520E09 +++$+++ Sorry; to be clearer: I'm not talking about a few bytes, which don't mean much even in terms of analog modems these days; I was speaking of visual height.  Your sig is about 3x the size of everyone else's.  It's kind of the Hummer of sigs.  READ ME READ ME READ ME!!! it seems to say. Anyway, it was just a request; it's not meant as a personal attack or anything. &mdash; <span style=\"font-family: Tahoma;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> +++$+++ ::Sorry; to be clearer: I'm not talking about a few bytes, which don't mean much even in terms of analog modems these days; I was speaking of visual height.  Your sig is about 3x the size of everyone else's.  It's kind of the Hummer of sigs.  READ ME READ ME READ ME!!! it seems to say. Anyway, it was just a request; it's not meant as a personal attack or anything. &mdash; <span style="font-family: Tahoma;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">[[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]]</span> &#91;[[User_talk:SMcCandlish|talk]]&#93; &#91;[[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|contrib]]&#93;</span> <span style="color: #990000; font-weight: bold;">ツ</span> 18:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
276009 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276006 +++$+++ 276008 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.174547100E09 +++$+++ It doesn't render in an outsized fashion on any combination of browser and platform available to me.  I would have changed it a long time ago if that was the case.  What are you using? <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::: It doesn't render in an outsized fashion on any combination of browser and platform available to me.  I would have changed it a long time ago if that was the case.  What are you using? <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:larger;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 00:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
276010 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276006 +++$+++ 276007 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.174789920E09 +++$+++ Hey, I'm still not interested in being an admin.  I've got plenty to keep me busy as a regular editor. Thanks. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::Hey, I'm still not interested in being an admin.  I've got plenty to keep me busy as a regular editor. Thanks. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 19:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

13864 +++$+++ Jimfbleak +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13864 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-30 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.217458620E09 +++$+++ Alternatively, and probably better, tell me what's wrong with the original position, with an MoS link, so that I can fix the problem myself without your doubtless well-intended but unhelpful moves.  +++$+++ Alternatively, and probably better, tell me what's wrong with the original position, with an MoS link, so that I can fix the problem myself without your doubtless well-intended but unhelpful moves. [[User:Jimfbleak|jimfbleak]] ([[User talk:Jimfbleak|talk]]) 15:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
13865 +++$+++ Jimfbleak +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13864 +++$+++ 13864 +++$+++ 2008-07-30 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.217461800E09 +++$+++ thanks, I've lowered the sardines to after opening para, but kept left aligned so images still alternate. That should comply with MoS, but if an problems, let me know  +++$+++ :thanks, I've lowered the sardines to after opening para, but kept left aligned so images still alternate. That should comply with MoS, but if an problems, let me know [[User:Jimfbleak|jimfbleak]] ([[User talk:Jimfbleak|talk]]) 16:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

450783 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Gurch +++$+++ 450783 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.308548040E09 +++$+++ I also notice there's no banner up above saying \"This page is 141 kilobytes long\". This really confuses me.  +++$+++ I also notice there's no banner up above saying "This page is 141 kilobytes long". This really confuses me. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 22:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
450784 +++$+++ Closedmouth +++$+++ Gurch +++$+++ 450783 +++$+++ 450783 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.308581220E09 +++$+++ <span class=\"plainlinks\">[http:\/\/www.fileformat.info\/info\/unicode\/char\/200b\/index.htm Bleep]<\/span>. -- +++$+++ :<span class="plainlinks">[http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/200b/index.htm Bleep]</span>. --[[User:Closedmouth|Closedmouth]] ([[User talk:Closedmouth|talk]]) 07:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
450785 +++$+++ Gurch +++$+++ Gurch +++$+++ 450783 +++$+++ 450783 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.308582240E09 +++$+++ Look at any long page you like, and you'll notice there is no \"This page is X kilobytes long\" on any of them. This is because the message was removed from MediaWiki eight months ago. Apparently, nobody here has noticed this yet.  +++$+++ : Look at any long page you like, and you'll notice there is no "This page is X kilobytes long" on any of them. This is because the message was removed from MediaWiki eight months ago. Apparently, nobody here has noticed this yet. [[User:Gurch|Gurch]] ([[User talk:Gurch#top|talk]]) 08:04, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
450786 +++$+++ Killiondude +++$+++ Gurch +++$+++ 450783 +++$+++ 450785 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.308582480E09 +++$+++ Does it count if you noticed it but were too lazy to see why?  +++$+++ ::Does it count if you noticed it but were too lazy to see why? [[User:Killiondude|Killiondude]] ([[User talk:Killiondude|talk]]) 08:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
450787 +++$+++ Gurch +++$+++ Gurch +++$+++ 450783 +++$+++ 450783 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.308712500E09 +++$+++ there I redesigned it are you happy now  +++$+++ : there I redesigned it are you happy now [[User:Gurch|Gurch]] ([[User talk:Gurch#top|talk]]) 20:15, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
450788 +++$+++ Sonia +++$+++ Gurch +++$+++ 450783 +++$+++ 450787 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.308712860E09 +++$+++ o_O  +++$+++ ::o_O [[User talk:Sonia|<font color="#CC0099">sonia</font><font color="black">♫</font>]] 20:21, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

538154 +++$+++ Tlmclain +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-19 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.169206080E09 +++$+++ NMajdan:  Before taking this idea to the entire group at [[WP:CFB]], I thought I'd run the idea by a couple of guys that seem to be level-headed, have experience in the Project and are telented designers.  I have become convinced that we need a fully-integrated solution to infoboxes and [[NCAA Division I-A national football championship|football championship article]].  I think that if we can give some semblance of order to the football championship article, then the infobox problem will solve itself.  My idea is to redo the main year-by-year table to fully report '''all''' claims to the National Title in each year, but designate the \"Wire Champ\" and the \"Consensus Champ\" each year.  Then the infoboxes would reference \"Wire Champs\" and \"Consensus Champs\" and tie back to the year-by-year table.  Take a look at [[User:Tlmclain\/Sandbox#National Champ project|National Champ project]] and you will see a few sample years that illustrate how this would work.  The sources for the poll information will be the [http:\/\/www.ncaa.org\/champadmin\/ia_football_past_champs.html NCAA] and [http:\/\/cfbdatawarehouse.com\/data\/national_championships\/year_by_year.php College Football Data Warehouse].  Let me know what you think about the idea and, if you like it, how it can be improved.  Also, you are more than welcome to fool around with my test table.  Thanks-- +++$+++ NMajdan:  Before taking this idea to the entire group at [[WP:CFB]], I thought I'd run the idea by a couple of guys that seem to be level-headed, have experience in the Project and are telented designers.  I have become convinced that we need a fully-integrated solution to infoboxes and [[NCAA Division I-A national football championship|football championship article]].  I think that if we can give some semblance of order to the football championship article, then the infobox problem will solve itself.  My idea is to redo the main year-by-year table to fully report '''all''' claims to the National Title in each year, but designate the "Wire Champ" and the "Consensus Champ" each year.  Then the infoboxes would reference "Wire Champs" and "Consensus Champs" and tie back to the year-by-year table.  Take a look at [[User:Tlmclain/Sandbox#National Champ project|National Champ project]] and you will see a few sample years that illustrate how this would work.  The sources for the poll information will be the [http://www.ncaa.org/champadmin/ia_football_past_champs.html NCAA] and [http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/national_championships/year_by_year.php College Football Data Warehouse].  Let me know what you think about the idea and, if you like it, how it can be improved.  Also, you are more than welcome to fool around with my test table.  Thanks--[[User:Tlmclain|Tlmclain ]] | [[User talk:Tlmclain|Talk]] 03:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
538155 +++$+++ Tlmclain +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538154 +++$+++ 538154 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.169213160E09 +++$+++ I also solicited the help of MECU and he found my initial message less than clear.  I have posted a much more detailed description of my \"vision\" on his [[User talk:Mecu#National Titles|talk page]].-- +++$+++ :I also solicited the help of MECU and he found my initial message less than clear.  I have posted a much more detailed description of my "vision" on his [[User talk:Mecu#National Titles|talk page]].--[[User:Tlmclain|Tlmclain ]] | [[User talk:Tlmclain|Talk]] 05:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
538156 +++$+++ Tlmclain +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538154 +++$+++ 538155 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.169251380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments.  Please let me know if there are any other hotly contested years to add to the sample table.  At MECU's suggestion, I am going to add 1967, which is one of the years that Tennessee fans seem to fight about (it already has 1941 for the Alabama folks).  The idea is to include a selection of the more controversial years to that participants in the discussion at [[WP:CFB]] can better evaluate the table and the approach when I post it there.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks for your comments.  Please let me know if there are any other hotly contested years to add to the sample table.  At MECU's suggestion, I am going to add 1967, which is one of the years that Tennessee fans seem to fight about (it already has 1941 for the Alabama folks).  The idea is to include a selection of the more controversial years to that participants in the discussion at [[WP:CFB]] can better evaluate the table and the approach when I post it there.--[[User:Tlmclain|Tlmclain ]] | [[User talk:Tlmclain|Talk]] 16:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
538157 +++$+++ Tlmclain +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538154 +++$+++ 538156 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.169793000E09 +++$+++ NMajdan:  I just went live with the presentation of this idea on [[WP:CFB]] at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#National Titles]].  Your input would be appreciated.-- +++$+++ :::NMajdan:  I just went live with the presentation of this idea on [[WP:CFB]] at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#National Titles]].  Your input would be appreciated.--[[User:Tlmclain|Tlmclain ]] | [[User talk:Tlmclain|Talk]] 22:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

276011 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-27 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.175040360E09 +++$+++ As for the DRM article, you were right. The DRM article should wait till media foundation and WinRMS articles are enhanced. --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ As for the DRM article, you were right. The DRM article should wait till media foundation and WinRMS articles are enhanced. --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 17:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
276012 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276011 +++$+++ 276011 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.175040480E09 +++$+++ On another note, I really think you can put the admin buttons to good use. :) --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ :On another note, I really think you can put the admin buttons to good use. :) --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 17:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
276013 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276011 +++$+++ 276011 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.175041320E09 +++$+++ I've been thinking about the main [[Features new to Windows Vista]] article and how we could have sections for each specific third-tier page on there.  In other words, it'd be an expansion of what is in [[Windows Vista]], keeping the same general order of things, but leaving the really detailed stuff to the third tier.  Ultimately, that would mean that there would be a Programmability section in the main Features article (instead of Technical), but it would be really short... two or three paragraphs max. Then we'd have that API article get into more detail about each component.  Whew, layers and layers. :-) <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : I've been thinking about the main [[Features new to Windows Vista]] article and how we could have sections for each specific third-tier page on there.  In other words, it'd be an expansion of what is in [[Windows Vista]], keeping the same general order of things, but leaving the really detailed stuff to the third tier.  Ultimately, that would mean that there would be a Programmability section in the main Features article (instead of Technical), but it would be really short... two or three paragraphs max. Then we'd have that API article get into more detail about each component.  Whew, layers and layers. :-) <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 17:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
276014 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276011 +++$+++ 276013 +++$+++ 2007-03-27 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.175041920E09 +++$+++ Really, so many tiers would be really difficult to handle. :P Shorter redirects to all these articles - like [[FWV]] for [[Features new to Windows Vista]], [[TWV]] for [[Technical features new to Windows Vista]] - would really help navigation for editors :D --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ ::Really, so many tiers would be really difficult to handle. :P Shorter redirects to all these articles - like [[FWV]] for [[Features new to Windows Vista]], [[TWV]] for [[Technical features new to Windows Vista]] - would really help navigation for editors :D --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 17:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

276015 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-31 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.175371440E09 +++$+++ Plus the WPF section is a bit confusiong as it does not make the disctinction and relationship with DWM clear. I will be summarizing the section and update the WPF secn tonight. --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ Plus the WPF section is a bit confusiong as it does not make the disctinction and relationship with DWM clear. I will be summarizing the section and update the WPF secn tonight. --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 13:04, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
276016 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276015 +++$+++ 276015 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.176092160E09 +++$+++ I expanded the networking section by two paragraphs, and its already around 20 odd KB. There are still a few more things to add, mainly around wireless network (which I will be doing first in the sandbox, [[User:Soumyasch\/Incubator\/Vista networking technologies|take a look]]. I think it should be spun off. What say? Also, I was thinking, in case this is spun off, should Network Access Protection get some mention? --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ :I expanded the networking section by two paragraphs, and its already around 20 odd KB. There are still a few more things to add, mainly around wireless network (which I will be doing first in the sandbox, [[User:Soumyasch/Incubator/Vista networking technologies|take a look]]. I think it should be spun off. What say? Also, I was thinking, in case this is spun off, should Network Access Protection get some mention? --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 21:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

276018 +++$+++ SmokeyTheCat +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.175797500E09 +++$+++ It seems a bit rude and unnecessary of you to remove my contribution to the talk page on this. I didn't touch the main article and was making an intelligent contribution, hoping to get some feedback.  +++$+++ It seems a bit rude and unnecessary of you to remove my contribution to the talk page on this. I didn't touch the main article and was making an intelligent contribution, hoping to get some feedback. [[User:SmokeyTheCat|SmokeyTheCat]] 11:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
276019 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276018 +++$+++ 276018 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.175810580E09 +++$+++ It's policy: [[WP:NOT#FORUM|Wikipedia is not a discussion forum]].  It also says this right at the top of the talk page. Removing off-topic conversation is actually ''necessary'' to keep us focused on building an encyclopedia. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : It's policy: [[WP:NOT#FORUM|Wikipedia is not a discussion forum]].  It also says this right at the top of the talk page. Removing off-topic conversation is actually ''necessary'' to keep us focused on building an encyclopedia. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 15:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
276020 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276018 +++$+++ 276018 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.175872860E09 +++$+++ My RfA has succeeded. Thanks for the support you have given in the RfA. Its really appreciated. :) Do not hesitate to contact me for any help you might need. --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ :My RfA has succeeded. Thanks for the support you have given in the RfA. Its really appreciated. :) Do not hesitate to contact me for any help you might need. --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 08:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

538163 +++$+++ Z4ns4tsu +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-27 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.169902440E09 +++$+++ You are awesome. Next time I'm in Tulsa, I'll buy you a beer. <font style=\"color:#1e90ff;font-weight:bold\"> +++$+++ You are awesome. Next time I'm in Tulsa, I'll buy you a beer. <font style="color:#1e90ff;font-weight:bold">[[User:Z4ns4tsu|z4ns4tsu]]</font>\<sup><font style="color:black;">[[User_talk:Z4ns4tsu|talk]]</font></sup> 04:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
538164 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538163 +++$+++ 538163 +++$+++ 2007-01-28 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.170037980E09 +++$+++ I think that would be fine. I think since it's just you or me (seemingly), that either of us putting an article into rotation that both of us (and others) that hasn't received any objection (like yours on the Florida page) should be \"automatic\" and acceptable and not need any discussion. Items like the Florida, since you've objected (which I'm fine with, it only meets the basic requirements) shouldn't be automatic and in order to be put in, either you would need to put it in yourself (thus saying that your objection is noted but we don't have anything else \"ready\"?) or you or you state that you're fine with the changes to the article that allow it to be used now (and I could put it in eventually). My only thoughts is that we're likely to get more attention before the season and during the season, so we may want to save our \"better\" articles until then? -- +++$+++ :I think that would be fine. I think since it's just you or me (seemingly), that either of us putting an article into rotation that both of us (and others) that hasn't received any objection (like yours on the Florida page) should be "automatic" and acceptable and not need any discussion. Items like the Florida, since you've objected (which I'm fine with, it only meets the basic requirements) shouldn't be automatic and in order to be put in, either you would need to put it in yourself (thus saying that your objection is noted but we don't have anything else "ready"?) or you or you state that you're fine with the changes to the article that allow it to be used now (and I could put it in eventually). My only thoughts is that we're likely to get more attention before the season and during the season, so we may want to save our "better" articles until then? --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 18:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
538165 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538163 +++$+++ 538163 +++$+++ 2007-01-28 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.170038640E09 +++$+++ It doesn't matter if he changed the license back. It was valid at that once time and we used it under that license at that time which he can't remove from us. Since it's been validated by an admin, it'll stay no matter what now. I've found quite a lot of pictures that aren't free on flickr. I've asked folks to change them and more are completely willing to do so, some are even pleased and honored that you want to use their work! I think we should write a page on how to do this, similar to the how to request permission page, but be flickr centric. -- +++$+++ :It doesn't matter if he changed the license back. It was valid at that once time and we used it under that license at that time which he can't remove from us. Since it's been validated by an admin, it'll stay no matter what now. I've found quite a lot of pictures that aren't free on flickr. I've asked folks to change them and more are completely willing to do so, some are even pleased and honored that you want to use their work! I think we should write a page on how to do this, similar to the how to request permission page, but be flickr centric. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 18:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
538166 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538163 +++$+++ 538163 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.170214740E09 +++$+++ Great work on the OU article.  Thanks for keeping up your hard work.  I will give it a thorough re-read and I anticipate being able to support the nom.  If I spot any problems I will let you know.   +++$+++ *Great work on the OU article.  Thanks for keeping up your hard work.  I will give it a thorough re-read and I anticipate being able to support the nom.  If I spot any problems I will let you know.  [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 19:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
538167 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538163 +++$+++ 538163 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.170289800E09 +++$+++ I'm fine with the CFB Portal picks for Feb. I still am not clear on how to do it, so I'll watch how you do it this month and then I could help out in the future. Good work jump starting the portal in the activity. -- +++$+++ :I'm fine with the CFB Portal picks for Feb. I still am not clear on how to do it, so I'll watch how you do it this month and then I could help out in the future. Good work jump starting the portal in the activity. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 16:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
538168 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538163 +++$+++ 538167 +++$+++ 2007-02-01 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.170375900E09 +++$+++ You came in and took away my thunder with your AWB and changing the category name. No biggie, was just wondering why near the end the pages were already transfered, and then I saw you were using AWB. I'll let you move [[:Category:2007 NCAA Division I-BS football season]] to the new name using your speedy AWB edits to save my fingers then. -- +++$+++ ::You came in and took away my thunder with your AWB and changing the category name. No biggie, was just wondering why near the end the pages were already transfered, and then I saw you were using AWB. I'll let you move [[:Category:2007 NCAA Division I-BS football season]] to the new name using your speedy AWB edits to save my fingers then. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 16:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

276021 +++$+++ Jigs41793 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.175924820E09 +++$+++ Warren, can I redesign your user page? Please reply me to [[User Talk:Jigs41793|my talk page]]. ''' +++$+++ Warren, can I redesign your user page? Please reply me to [[User Talk:Jigs41793|my talk page]]. '''[[User:Jigs41793|<span style="color:black;background:gold">Jigs41793</span>]]''' [[User Talk:Jigs41793|<span style="color:white;background:black"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]]<span style="color:red;background:black">/</span>[[Special:Contributions/Jigs41793|<span style="color:white;background:black"><sub>contribs</sub></span>]] 22:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
276022 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276021 +++$+++ 276021 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.175925960E09 +++$+++ Not interested now... maybe later this year?  I'll let you know.  Thanks. :) <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Not interested now... maybe later this year?  I'll let you know.  Thanks. :) <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 23:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

276023 +++$+++ Peterl +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.176316200E09 +++$+++ If h'ware requirements are a criticism of this (or any) OS< then surely s'ware incompat is too?  +++$+++ If h'ware requirements are a criticism of this (or any) OS< then surely s'ware incompat is too? [[User:Peterl|peterl]] 11:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
276024 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276023 +++$+++ 276023 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.176316560E09 +++$+++ You can't write your own criticism into articles on Wikipedia.  Your personal opinion (or mine) on the matter are not welcome.  You have to find [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable, published sources]] that state this criticism, and quote them.  That's how Wikipedia works.  Also, simply stating that something works or doesn't isn't [[criticism]] in and of itself; it's just a statement. An analysis as to why the something is good or bad, is what criticism is all about. Think about film critics; they don't just write something like, \"Prisoner of Azkaban is a movie about young wizards, it's two and a half hours long and is now playing in theaters\", right?  They proffer opinions about the actors, the set pieces, the directorship, and so on.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : You can't write your own criticism into articles on Wikipedia.  Your personal opinion (or mine) on the matter are not welcome.  You have to find [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable, published sources]] that state this criticism, and quote them.  That's how Wikipedia works.  Also, simply stating that something works or doesn't isn't [[criticism]] in and of itself; it's just a statement. An analysis as to why the something is good or bad, is what criticism is all about. Think about film critics; they don't just write something like, "Prisoner of Azkaban is a movie about young wizards, it's two and a half hours long and is now playing in theaters", right?  They proffer opinions about the actors, the set pieces, the directorship, and so on.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 11:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
276025 +++$+++ Peterl +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276023 +++$+++ 276023 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.176318900E09 +++$+++ True. But it's not just me. For just one example, see http:\/\/www.informationweek.com\/news\/showArticle.jhtml;?articleID=197700789 where DOT says \"Compatibility with existing applications appears to be the Transportation Department's major concern.\"  +++$+++ : True. But it's not just me. For just one example, see http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;?articleID=197700789 where DOT says "Compatibility with existing applications appears to be the Transportation Department's major concern." [[User:Peterl|peterl]] 12:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
276026 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276023 +++$+++ 276025 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.176319260E09 +++$+++ I agree, but \"appears to be\" isn't the sort of foundation we want to be building Wikipedia articles on. If we can find studies and professional analysis of the issue, that would be a much stronger starting point.  You're on the right track, though... keep looking around and I'm sure you'll find some good stuff.  With that said, further discussion about the article's current or future contents should continue on [[Talk:Windows Vista]] where everyone can see it... thanks. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :: I agree, but "appears to be" isn't the sort of foundation we want to be building Wikipedia articles on. If we can find studies and professional analysis of the issue, that would be a much stronger starting point.  You're on the right track, though... keep looking around and I'm sure you'll find some good stuff.  With that said, further discussion about the article's current or future contents should continue on [[Talk:Windows Vista]] where everyone can see it... thanks. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 12:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
276027 +++$+++ Peterl +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276023 +++$+++ 276025 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.176319440E09 +++$+++ Shall do.  +++$+++ :: Shall do. [[User:Peterl|peterl]] 12:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

13881 +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-21 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.227272280E09 +++$+++ Saw you updated the featured topic checklist with this article. Unfortunately, it's only a good article candidate at this point, not a good article yet. Of course, that could change once someone reviews it. :)  +++$+++ Saw you updated the featured topic checklist with this article. Unfortunately, it's only a good article candidate at this point, not a good article yet. Of course, that could change once someone reviews it. :) [[User:JKBrooks85|JKBrooks85]] ([[User talk:JKBrooks85|talk]]) 04:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13882 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13881 +++$+++ 13881 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.227311880E09 +++$+++ Oops sorry, I guess I jumped the gun there.  +++$+++ :Oops sorry, I guess I jumped the gun there. [[User:Rreagan007|Rreagan007]] ([[User talk:Rreagan007#top|talk]]) 15:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

538170 +++$+++ Dgies +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-05 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.170747120E09 +++$+++ Care to explain [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_comment%2FChairboy&diff=105908985&oldid=105908925 this edit]? &mdash; +++$+++ Care to explain [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_comment%2FChairboy&diff=105908985&oldid=105908925 this edit]? &mdash;[[User:Dgies|Dgies]]<sup>[[User talk:Dgies|t]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Dgies|c]]</sup> 23:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
538171 +++$+++ Dgies +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538170 +++$+++ 538170 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.170756600E09 +++$+++ Sorry, didn't mean to sound so accusational.  Notice I didn't accuse you of any nefarious intent, but it was more of a \"What is going on here?\" &mdash; +++$+++ : Sorry, didn't mean to sound so accusational.  Notice I didn't accuse you of any nefarious intent, but it was more of a "What is going on here?" &mdash;[[User:Dgies|Dgies]]<sup>[[User talk:Dgies|t]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Dgies|c]]</sup> 02:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

13883 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-03 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.228302360E09 +++$+++ You don't have to be a major contributor to nominate an article, or a set of articles, for any rank. Actually, you don't have to have contributed at all. If you believe in the articles, then go ahead an nominated them for Good Topic status. The only article I have substantially worked on is ''Spider-Man 3''. The first film article I worked a bit, but I left after some disagreement with a supposed \"producer\" (or whomever) came to Wikipedia and started terrorizing the page with his horrible grammar while he tried to \"correct\" all the mistakes. I haven't worked on the second one that much either, nor the \"film series\" page. I made some contribs, but not that many. I'm not really aware of the shape of any of those articles, behind ''SP3''. If you think they're good enough, then you should go ahead and nominate them.  +++$+++ You don't have to be a major contributor to nominate an article, or a set of articles, for any rank. Actually, you don't have to have contributed at all. If you believe in the articles, then go ahead an nominated them for Good Topic status. The only article I have substantially worked on is ''Spider-Man 3''. The first film article I worked a bit, but I left after some disagreement with a supposed "producer" (or whomever) came to Wikipedia and started terrorizing the page with his horrible grammar while he tried to "correct" all the mistakes. I haven't worked on the second one that much either, nor the "film series" page. I made some contribs, but not that many. I'm not really aware of the shape of any of those articles, behind ''SP3''. If you think they're good enough, then you should go ahead and nominate them. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 03:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
13884 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13883 +++$+++ 13883 +++$+++ 2008-12-03 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.228305000E09 +++$+++ That's not a valid oppose. There is no policy, guideline, or even an essay that says you need \"the blessing of the contributors\" for such a nomination. It's \"nice\" to do, but there is no obligation as [[WP:OWN|they don't own the articles in question]]. I don't want to nominate them because I haven't read them in a long time, and I don't have the time right now (end of the school semester) to re-read them all and check to make sure they still meet the GA criteria. That, and be the one to monitor the GT nomination. If you nominate I'll keep an eye on it and rebut anyone that claims you need \"major contributor approval\".  +++$+++ :That's not a valid oppose. There is no policy, guideline, or even an essay that says you need "the blessing of the contributors" for such a nomination. It's "nice" to do, but there is no obligation as [[WP:OWN|they don't own the articles in question]]. I don't want to nominate them because I haven't read them in a long time, and I don't have the time right now (end of the school semester) to re-read them all and check to make sure they still meet the GA criteria. That, and be the one to monitor the GT nomination. If you nominate I'll keep an eye on it and rebut anyone that claims you need "major contributor approval". [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 03:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

264458 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264458 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.205362320E09 +++$+++ I've left a detailed \"post-GA\" review on the talk page (which includes a couple of things I probably shouldn't have let pass for GA... [[mea culpa]]!). All the best,  +++$+++ I've left a detailed "post-GA" review on the talk page (which includes a couple of things I probably shouldn't have let pass for GA... [[mea culpa]]!). All the best, [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 15:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
264459 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264458 +++$+++ 264458 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.205372700E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! Your improvements look great. It's an interesting and well-written article, and you have my best wishes for FA. I vaguely remember the series - I caught some of the later episodes of series one, and thought it looked innovative and promising... and then it seemed to vanish. It's strangely satisfying to finally discover what happened ;)  +++$+++ :You're welcome! Your improvements look great. It's an interesting and well-written article, and you have my best wishes for FA. I vaguely remember the series - I caught some of the later episodes of series one, and thought it looked innovative and promising... and then it seemed to vanish. It's strangely satisfying to finally discover what happened ;) [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 18:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

13887 +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-13 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.229184240E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know that I've submitted [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates#2006 Gator Bowl|2006 Gator Bowl]] as a FAC. Any comments, questions, or support you'd offer would be appreciated. Thanks!  +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know that I've submitted [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates#2006 Gator Bowl|2006 Gator Bowl]] as a FAC. Any comments, questions, or support you'd offer would be appreciated. Thanks! [[User:JKBrooks85|JKBrooks85]] ([[User talk:JKBrooks85|talk]]) 08:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
13888 +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13887 +++$+++ 13887 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 08:15:00 +++$+++ 1.229789700E09 +++$+++ If you have any comments, they'd be useful.  +++$+++ :If you have any comments, they'd be useful. [[User:JKBrooks85|JKBrooks85]] ([[User talk:JKBrooks85|talk]]) 08:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

276033 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276033 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.176737340E09 +++$+++ Hope you feel like a big man, writing that. Feel good? -  +++$+++ Hope you feel like a big man, writing that. Feel good? - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 08:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
276034 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276033 +++$+++ 276033 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.176874500E09 +++$+++ This comment says a lot more about you than it does about me.  Have a nice day.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : This comment says a lot more about you than it does about me.  Have a nice day.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 22:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

276035 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.176741780E09 +++$+++ Hey, I see you're part of the WikiProject Microsoft Windows, but it isn't part of the [[WP:1.0]] program. Let me know if you want to take part in it and I'll help you out, since I'm part of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ukraine]]. That's what I did for that WikiProject. \u2014  +++$+++ Hey, I see you're part of the WikiProject Microsoft Windows, but it isn't part of the [[WP:1.0]] program. Let me know if you want to take part in it and I'll help you out, since I'm part of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ukraine]]. That's what I did for that WikiProject. — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]]<sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 09:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
276036 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276035 +++$+++ 276035 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.176874920E09 +++$+++ Hi Alex, the idea is definitely interesting to me, especially since we do have several articles floating around that may be suitable for inclusion in 1.0.  My time to work on Wikipedia is going to be pretty limited for the next few weeks, so I won't be able to devote much time to it yet.  By all means, go ahead and get the ball rolling, however it's done, and I'll keep an eye on it and try to learn about what's involved. :) <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Hi Alex, the idea is definitely interesting to me, especially since we do have several articles floating around that may be suitable for inclusion in 1.0.  My time to work on Wikipedia is going to be pretty limited for the next few weeks, so I won't be able to devote much time to it yet.  By all means, go ahead and get the ball rolling, however it's done, and I'll keep an eye on it and try to learn about what's involved. :) <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 22:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
276037 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276035 +++$+++ 276036 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.176878880E09 +++$+++ Got it started: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft Windows\/Assessment]]. Now all the WikiProject members have to do is add\/modify <nowiki>{{WikiProject Microsoft Windows|class=Class|importance=Importance}}<\/nowiki> to\/on every article within the scope of the WikiProject. I did one for you already. :-) \u2014  +++$+++ :: Got it started: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft Windows/Assessment]]. Now all the WikiProject members have to do is add/modify <nowiki>{{WikiProject Microsoft Windows|class=Class|importance=Importance}}</nowiki> to/on every article within the scope of the WikiProject. I did one for you already. :-) — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]]<sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 23:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
276038 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276035 +++$+++ 276036 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.176879000E09 +++$+++ Page is updated by a bot: http:\/\/www.math.ucla.edu\/~aoleg\/wp\/wp10\/run_wp10.html \u2014  +++$+++ :: Page is updated by a bot: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~aoleg/wp/wp10/run_wp10.html — [[User:Akhristov|Alex]]<sup>([[User_talk:Akhristov|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 23:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

538180 +++$+++ SFTVLGUY2 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.171687500E09 +++$+++ The file clearly states this is an image from a poster. Since when does this require any additional explanation?  +++$+++ The file clearly states this is an image from a poster. Since when does this require any additional explanation? [[User:SFTVLGUY2|SFTVLGUY2]] 20:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
538181 +++$+++ SFTVLGUY2 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538180 +++$+++ 538180 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.171773960E09 +++$+++ To the file I have added what I believe you seem to think is required. I have checked many other similar images and find nothing re: \"free use,\" so I have no idea why this is such an important issue for you.  +++$+++ :To the file I have added what I believe you seem to think is required. I have checked many other similar images and find nothing re: "free use," so I have no idea why this is such an important issue for you. [[User:SFTVLGUY2|SFTVLGUY2]] 20:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

613985 +++$+++ SteveMcCluskey +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613985 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-30 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.259645640E09 +++$+++ Feel free to either edit the draft or submit comments on [[User talk:SteveMcCluskey\/sandbox2|its talk page]].  -- +++$+++ Feel free to either edit the draft or submit comments on [[User talk:SteveMcCluskey/sandbox2|its talk page]].  --[[User:SteveMcCluskey|SteveMcCluskey]] ([[User talk:SteveMcCluskey|talk]]) 21:34, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
613986 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613985 +++$+++ 613985 +++$+++ 2009-12-01 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.259690880E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'll try to add info on the perennial arguments Logicus made on the Darwin talk page, can't tackle it for a couple of days. . .  +++$+++ :Thanks, I'll try to add info on the perennial arguments Logicus made on the Darwin talk page, can't tackle it for a couple of days. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 10:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
613987 +++$+++ SteveMcCluskey +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613985 +++$+++ 613986 +++$+++ 2009-12-01 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.259708640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for offering to help.  -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for offering to help.  --[[User:SteveMcCluskey|SteveMcCluskey]] ([[User talk:SteveMcCluskey|talk]]) 15:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

276041 +++$+++ Chetblong +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276041 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-02 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.178172600E09 +++$+++ All the sources I removed were old and were refering to Vista versions previous to Windows Vista RTM. And some places were missing sources. (please reply to [[User Talk:Chetblong|my talk]] page)  +++$+++ All the sources I removed were old and were refering to Vista versions previous to Windows Vista RTM. And some places were missing sources. (please reply to [[User Talk:Chetblong|my talk]] page) [[User:Chetblong|Chetblong]] 23:10, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
276042 +++$+++ Akhristov +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276041 +++$+++ 276041 +++$+++ 2007-05-12 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.179036960E09 +++$+++ Oops, slow thinking today. You didn't revert me, but that's my source for Windows Server 2008. \u2014 [[User talk:Akhristov|Alex]]<sup>( +++$+++ : Oops, slow thinking today. You didn't revert me, but that's my source for Windows Server 2008. — [[User talk:Akhristov|Alex]]<sup>([[User:Akhristov|U]]|[[Special:Contributions/Akhristov|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Akhristov|E]])</sup> 23:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
276043 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276041 +++$+++ 276042 +++$+++ 2007-05-13 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.179041280E09 +++$+++ Yeah... some Microsoft sign-up pages are saying Windows Server 2008 now.  You know me, I'm a stickler for these things, but this looks like the real thing... run with it! <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :: Yeah... some Microsoft sign-up pages are saying Windows Server 2008 now.  You know me, I'm a stickler for these things, but this looks like the real thing... run with it! <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 00:28, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

570295 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-30 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.209594780E09 +++$+++ When an anonymous user blanks something without explanation, it's usually considered vandalism. You also blanked the same content, but you're not anonymous, so if you had done it not as a reversion I would have just let it go. As a reversion of my own (admittedly COI) edit, I'd appreciate a little more thought: it's not enough to say that it's COI and therefore bad. I want to see an actual explanation for why you think the article is better not having that link. I'm sure it can be justified but you haven't even attempted to do so, and neither did the anon. \u2014 +++$+++ When an anonymous user blanks something without explanation, it's usually considered vandalism. You also blanked the same content, but you're not anonymous, so if you had done it not as a reversion I would have just let it go. As a reversion of my own (admittedly COI) edit, I'd appreciate a little more thought: it's not enough to say that it's COI and therefore bad. I want to see an actual explanation for why you think the article is better not having that link. I'm sure it can be justified but you haven't even attempted to do so, and neither did the anon. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 15:33, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
570296 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570295 +++$+++ 570295 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.209595440E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 15:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
570297 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570295 +++$+++ 570296 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.209596280E09 +++$+++ # We're not here to be doling out punishments for imagined crimes, we're here to build an encyclopedia. I asked for, and still haven't received, some evidence that when editing mainspace content you have in mind how your edit helps towards that goal. If you don't have that in mind, you shouldn't be editing here. So, please: come up with an explanation for why removing that particular link is an improvement. Better, come up with a story about how you had that explanation in mind the whole time and that preventing conflicts of interest was only secondary in your mind. \u2014 +++$+++ ::# We're not here to be doling out punishments for imagined crimes, we're here to build an encyclopedia. I asked for, and still haven't received, some evidence that when editing mainspace content you have in mind how your edit helps towards that goal. If you don't have that in mind, you shouldn't be editing here. So, please: come up with an explanation for why removing that particular link is an improvement. Better, come up with a story about how you had that explanation in mind the whole time and that preventing conflicts of interest was only secondary in your mind. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 15:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

13900 +++$+++ Rst20xx +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13900 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-12 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.244842560E09 +++$+++ Or, to point something else out, it's 1\/3 that the topics are actually getting promoted\/demoted on, not 33%. In reality this is all a bit irrelevant because we'd need a topic of 300 articles for it to make a difference, but there you go, just thought it was more accurate -  +++$+++ Or, to point something else out, it's 1/3 that the topics are actually getting promoted/demoted on, not 33%. In reality this is all a bit irrelevant because we'd need a topic of 300 articles for it to make a difference, but there you go, just thought it was more accurate - [[User:Rst20xx|rst20xx]] ([[User talk:Rst20xx|talk]]) 14:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
13901 +++$+++ Rst20xx +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13900 +++$+++ 13900 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.244843640E09 +++$+++ Oh yeah of course, 100 articles, not 300! Duhhhh. There should never be a topic with 100 articles, that's way too big and the topic should be split, but anyway, I'm going to change it back, BECAUSE... [[Wikipedia talk:Featured topic candidates\/2009#is anybody opposing bumping to 1.2F3.3F|we actually originally discussed 1\/3 :D]] -  +++$+++ :Oh yeah of course, 100 articles, not 300! Duhhhh. There should never be a topic with 100 articles, that's way too big and the topic should be split, but anyway, I'm going to change it back, BECAUSE... [[Wikipedia talk:Featured topic candidates/2009#is anybody opposing bumping to 1.2F3.3F|we actually originally discussed 1/3 :D]] - [[User:Rst20xx|rst20xx]] ([[User talk:Rst20xx|talk]]) 14:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
13902 +++$+++ Rst20xx +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13900 +++$+++ 13901 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.244844060E09 +++$+++ Hmmm not sure, that's probably the best example but it might be better off broken up into groups or periods. ANYWAY! We'll have to wait and see...  +++$+++ ::Hmmm not sure, that's probably the best example but it might be better off broken up into groups or periods. ANYWAY! We'll have to wait and see... [[User:Rst20xx|rst20xx]] ([[User talk:Rst20xx|talk]]) 15:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

538190 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538190 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-02 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.172894580E09 +++$+++ Hey, I just looked at the portal and the March article\/picture aren't up. Are you going to do them? Kinda embarassing to have the red links there, so if I don't hear from you within a few hours, I'll do it. Lemme know. (I know you selected them already). -- +++$+++ Hey, I just looked at the portal and the March article/picture aren't up. Are you going to do them? Kinda embarassing to have the red links there, so if I don't hear from you within a few hours, I'll do it. Lemme know. (I know you selected them already). --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 20:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
538191 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538190 +++$+++ 538190 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.172895120E09 +++$+++ No problem. I wish we could have a counter on that so we could see how many people actually visit it to see if it's useful. Also, we could see that 50 folks visited it yesterday and today and saw the goof... but alas, no biggie in the end. -- +++$+++ :No problem. I wish we could have a counter on that so we could see how many people actually visit it to see if it's useful. Also, we could see that 50 folks visited it yesterday and today and saw the goof... but alas, no biggie in the end. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 20:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

480560 +++$+++ Brycetom +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-17 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.290061920E09 +++$+++ There have been no objections to the [[Talk:The Tree at Rockefeller Center|move request]]. Do you know what the next step is for getting the page moved? The page should reside at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rockefeller_Center_Christmas_Tree&redirect=no Rockefeller Center Christmas Tree] and The Tree at Rockefeller Center should be redirected. Currently, it is the exact opposite setup. Thank you for your guidance and assistance. \/\/ +++$+++ There have been no objections to the [[Talk:The Tree at Rockefeller Center|move request]]. Do you know what the next step is for getting the page moved? The page should reside at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rockefeller_Center_Christmas_Tree&redirect=no Rockefeller Center Christmas Tree] and The Tree at Rockefeller Center should be redirected. Currently, it is the exact opposite setup. Thank you for your guidance and assistance. //[[User:Brycetom|Brycetom]] ([[User talk:Brycetom|talk]]) 22:32, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
480561 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480560 +++$+++ 480560 +++$+++ 2010-11-17 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.290062040E09 +++$+++ We just have to wait; an administrator will close the discussion and perform the move in a few days (unless they choose to re-list it for further discussion, which will take a few more days). -- +++$+++ :We just have to wait; an administrator will close the discussion and perform the move in a few days (unless they choose to re-list it for further discussion, which will take a few more days). --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 22:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

276049 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-24 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.180025880E09 +++$+++ Hey, I think it would be better to leave the apps in the template for quick one-touch access. They do make nav easier. May be a separate windows components line? What do you think? --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ Hey, I think it would be better to leave the apps in the template for quick one-touch access. They do make nav easier. May be a separate windows components line? What do you think? --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 09:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
276050 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276049 +++$+++ 276049 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.180042920E09 +++$+++ Perhaps the answer here is to build a navigation template for components of Windows, along the same lines as the Microsoft APIs one you put together earlier this month.  I've been thinking about that for a year but I've never gotten around to doing it. :-) <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Perhaps the answer here is to build a navigation template for components of Windows, along the same lines as the Microsoft APIs one you put together earlier this month.  I've been thinking about that for a year but I've never gotten around to doing it. :-) <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 14:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
276051 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276049 +++$+++ 276050 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.180052220E09 +++$+++ Yeah that can be a bit of a problem. But there are already too many templates! I was thinking of a super-template that will house all the templates in their collapsed forms, with some parameter deciding which template to open by default. How about that? --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ ::Yeah that can be a bit of a problem. But there are already too many templates! I was thinking of a super-template that will house all the templates in their collapsed forms, with some parameter deciding which template to open by default. How about that? --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 17:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
276052 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276049 +++$+++ 276051 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.180261380E09 +++$+++ I'd written you a lengthy reply to this but it doesn't appear to have been posted.  Hmpfh.  The short short version of my thoughts is this:  We could create some more side navigation templates like {{tl|Windows Vista}}, which I think has worked out really well as our first \"experiment\" with banding together a set of closely related Windows articles.  There's a bunch of places where this would work out nicely, like with DirectX articles or Windows XP or Control Panel stuff or whatever.  The key is to pick areas where the list of subjects is well-defined and completable; such a template would have 5-15 items.  Then, we can cover the broad-scope stuff in bottom-of-article nav templates.  I don't particularily like having more than one of those templates at the bottom of the page... it's a lot of clutter.  The bottom of [[Mac OS X]] is particularily heinous.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::: I'd written you a lengthy reply to this but it doesn't appear to have been posted.  Hmpfh.  The short short version of my thoughts is this:  We could create some more side navigation templates like {{tl|Windows Vista}}, which I think has worked out really well as our first "experiment" with banding together a set of closely related Windows articles.  There's a bunch of places where this would work out nicely, like with DirectX articles or Windows XP or Control Panel stuff or whatever.  The key is to pick areas where the list of subjects is well-defined and completable; such a template would have 5-15 items.  Then, we can cover the broad-scope stuff in bottom-of-article nav templates.  I don't particularily like having more than one of those templates at the bottom of the page... it's a lot of clutter.  The bottom of [[Mac OS X]] is particularily heinous.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 03:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

89699 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-11 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.186825380E09 +++$+++ I'll take care of this latest issue.  &ndash;  +++$+++ I'll take care of this latest issue.  &ndash; [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 02:43, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
89700 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89699 +++$+++ 89699 +++$+++ 2007-08-11 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.186827660E09 +++$+++ Now we wait. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/3RR&diff=prev&oldid=150527634]. &ndash;  +++$+++ :Now we wait. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&diff=prev&oldid=150527634]. &ndash; [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 03:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
89701 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89699 +++$+++ 89699 +++$+++ 2007-08-11 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.186829340E09 +++$+++ Ok, apparently 172 has [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_%28film%29&diff=150525364&oldid=150524961 self reverted].  &ndash;  +++$+++ :Ok, apparently 172 has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_%28film%29&diff=150525364&oldid=150524961 self reverted].  &ndash; [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 03:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

13909 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13909 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-25 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.248518220E09 +++$+++ Where does it say in [[WP:MOSDASH]] that en dashes should not be spaced in article titles? This would affect hundreds of articles, and would create ambiguity problems.  +++$+++ Where does it say in [[WP:MOSDASH]] that en dashes should not be spaced in article titles? This would affect hundreds of articles, and would create ambiguity problems. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 03:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
13910 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13909 +++$+++ 13909 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.248519360E09 +++$+++ \"''Spacing:'' All disjunctive en dashes are unspaced, except when there is a space within either one or both of the items ({{xt|the New York \u2013 Sydney flight}}; {{xt|the New Zealand \u2013 South Africa grand final}}; {{xt|June 3, 1888 \u2013 August 18, 1940}}, but {{xt|June\u2013August 1940}}).\"  +++$+++ :"''Spacing:'' All disjunctive en dashes are unspaced, except when there is a space within either one or both of the items ({{xt|the New York – Sydney flight}}; {{xt|the New Zealand – South Africa grand final}}; {{xt|June 3, 1888 – August 18, 1940}}, but {{xt|June–August 1940}})." [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 03:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
13911 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13909 +++$+++ 13910 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.248519660E09 +++$+++ No problem, and thank you for your politeness and understanding.  +++$+++ ::No problem, and thank you for your politeness and understanding. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 04:01, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

276055 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.181073420E09 +++$+++ [[:Template:MSNav|Need a review :)]]. Its not complete yet. The order of templates is to be decided. The spacing between them reduced, if not removed, and other kinks ironed. But it at least shows the intention. --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ [[:Template:MSNav|Need a review :)]]. Its not complete yet. The order of templates is to be decided. The spacing between them reduced, if not removed, and other kinks ironed. But it at least shows the intention. --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 12:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
276056 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.181093700E09 +++$+++ Thanks :) Actually you are quite late in this case. :P It was announced yesterday! Cya around. --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ :Thanks :) Actually you are quite late in this case. :P It was announced yesterday! Cya around. --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 18:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
276057 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ 276056 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.181093820E09 +++$+++ Oh and one thing, in the lead of [[Mac OS X v10.5]] it says it will support 64bit GUI apps, but from what I have read, support will not be limited to GUI apps only. Could you please take a look at that? Sorry for bombarding with requests. :D --<span style=\"background-color: #Fda;\">'' +++$+++ ::Oh and one thing, in the lead of [[Mac OS X v10.5]] it says it will support 64bit GUI apps, but from what I have read, support will not be limited to GUI apps only. Could you please take a look at that? Sorry for bombarding with requests. :D --<span style="background-color: #Fda;">''[[User:Soumyasch|<font color="#ff6633">soum</font>]]'' [[User talk:Soumyasch|(0_o)]]</span> 18:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
276058 +++$+++ Moe Epsilon +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.181197200E09 +++$+++ I wish you would assume good faith a little more than call me a blatant liar, I take it as a personal attack. It was a minor edit to add the tag, regardless. I notified the uploader of the Image I tagged and tagged the Image appropritely. Conforting me head on by first calling me a liar, ain't going to help your chances. \u2014  +++$+++ :I wish you would assume good faith a little more than call me a blatant liar, I take it as a personal attack. It was a minor edit to add the tag, regardless. I notified the uploader of the Image I tagged and tagged the Image appropritely. Conforting me head on by first calling me a liar, ain't going to help your chances. — [[User:Moe Epsilon|<font color="FF0000">M</font><font color="EE0000" >o</font><font color="DD0000">e</font>]] [[User talk:Moe Epsilon|<font color="0000FF">ε</font>]] 23:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
276059 +++$+++ Moe Epsilon +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ 276058 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.181198820E09 +++$+++ I suggest you back off. How is disrepectful, I think you need to look up the meaning, because I'm not trying to decieve editors into anything, and your assuming bad faith that I am. I did everything as policy, guidelines and custom dictates. It does not matter what the hell I put in my edit summary when I correctly tag the damn thing. And what the hell are you talking about? I put '''orphan(ed)''', and '''no rationale''' in my last few edit summaries. The last one I put minor edit in was the one you already bitched at me about. \u2014  +++$+++ ::I suggest you back off. How is disrepectful, I think you need to look up the meaning, because I'm not trying to decieve editors into anything, and your assuming bad faith that I am. I did everything as policy, guidelines and custom dictates. It does not matter what the hell I put in my edit summary when I correctly tag the damn thing. And what the hell are you talking about? I put '''orphan(ed)''', and '''no rationale''' in my last few edit summaries. The last one I put minor edit in was the one you already bitched at me about. — [[User:Moe Epsilon|<font color="FF0000">M</font><font color="EE0000" >o</font><font color="DD0000">e</font>]] [[User talk:Moe Epsilon|<font color="0000FF">ε</font>]] 23:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
276060 +++$+++ Moe Epsilon +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ 276059 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.181199600E09 +++$+++ There was no issue to begin with. Now I request you stop leaving me messages unless you got something else left to discuss. \u2014  +++$+++ :::There was no issue to begin with. Now I request you stop leaving me messages unless you got something else left to discuss. — [[User:Moe Epsilon|<font color="FF0000">M</font><font color="EE0000" >o</font><font color="DD0000">e</font>]] [[User talk:Moe Epsilon|<font color="0000FF">ε</font>]] 00:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
276061 +++$+++ Moe Epsilon +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ 276060 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.181200140E09 +++$+++ What the hell did I just tell you about personal attacks? \u2014  +++$+++ ::::What the hell did I just tell you about personal attacks? — [[User:Moe Epsilon|<font color="FF0000">M</font><font color="EE0000" >o</font><font color="DD0000">e</font>]] [[User talk:Moe Epsilon|<font color="0000FF">ε</font>]] 00:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
276062 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ 276061 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.181200320E09 +++$+++ We have an encyclopedia to build, Moe.  Please feel free to use my talk page for issues solely relating to that goal.  Thanks.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::::: We have an encyclopedia to build, Moe.  Please feel free to use my talk page for issues solely relating to that goal.  Thanks.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 00:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
276063 +++$+++ Moe Epsilon +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ 276062 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.181200500E09 +++$+++ And how does insulting me in a heading, ''changing'' my edit, help benefit this encyclopedia? \u2014  +++$+++ ::::::And how does insulting me in a heading, ''changing'' my edit, help benefit this encyclopedia? — [[User:Moe Epsilon|<font color="FF0000">M</font><font color="EE0000" >o</font><font color="DD0000">e</font>]] [[User talk:Moe Epsilon|<font color="0000FF">ε</font>]] 00:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
276064 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ 276063 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.181201220E09 +++$+++ It's really not an insult, Moe, and I mean that sincerely. It's just a word that describes what you've done here.  [[The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language|AHD]]'s [http:\/\/dictionary.reference.com\/browse\/berate definition] of \"berate\" is \"To rebuke or scold angrily and at length\".  Let me organise my talk page as I wish.  Again, I request that you use my talk page for issues solely related to building the encyclopedia.  I trust you'll agree that continuing this discussion benefits nobody.  Thanks.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::::::: It's really not an insult, Moe, and I mean that sincerely. It's just a word that describes what you've done here.  [[The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language|AHD]]'s [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/berate definition] of "berate" is "To rebuke or scold angrily and at length".  Let me organise my talk page as I wish.  Again, I request that you use my talk page for issues solely related to building the encyclopedia.  I trust you'll agree that continuing this discussion benefits nobody.  Thanks.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 00:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
276065 +++$+++ Moe Epsilon +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276055 +++$+++ 276064 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.181201460E09 +++$+++ It's not the point, you're changing my edit to what you see fit. How would you like it if I restored you're conversation and renamed the heading \"Warrens tirelessly ranting about some shit\"? It's not right to casually change headings when it offends someone and I'm telling you right now, yes, it does offends me. \u2014  +++$+++ ::::::::It's not the point, you're changing my edit to what you see fit. How would you like it if I restored you're conversation and renamed the heading "Warrens tirelessly ranting about some shit"? It's not right to casually change headings when it offends someone and I'm telling you right now, yes, it does offends me. — [[User:Moe Epsilon|<font color="FF0000">M</font><font color="EE0000" >o</font><font color="DD0000">e</font>]] [[User talk:Moe Epsilon|<font color="0000FF">ε</font>]] 00:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

538206 +++$+++ Itayb +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-13 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.173820740E09 +++$+++ I'd like to be adopted by you. I'm not a new user, but i've seen you describe yourself as a template guru and as one who understands and uses ParserFunctions. These are topics i know nearly nothing about, but would like to know more. I'd like to be given small projects to work on, preferrably such projects that can actually be useful to Wikipedia, and to have guidance at hand when i need it, while i carry them out. Would you consider adopting me?  +++$+++ I'd like to be adopted by you. I'm not a new user, but i've seen you describe yourself as a template guru and as one who understands and uses ParserFunctions. These are topics i know nearly nothing about, but would like to know more. I'd like to be given small projects to work on, preferrably such projects that can actually be useful to Wikipedia, and to have guidance at hand when i need it, while i carry them out. Would you consider adopting me? [[User:Itayb|Itayb]] 14:19, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
538207 +++$+++ Itayb +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538206 +++$+++ 538206 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.173825540E09 +++$+++ I've responded.  +++$+++ :I've responded. [[User:Itayb|Itayb]] 15:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
538208 +++$+++ Itayb +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538206 +++$+++ 538207 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.173848400E09 +++$+++ [[User talk:Itayb#Re: template oriented adoption|I've responded]].  +++$+++ ::[[User talk:Itayb#Re: template oriented adoption|I've responded]]. [[User:Itayb|Itayb]] 22:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
538209 +++$+++ Itayb +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538206 +++$+++ 538208 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.174061460E09 +++$+++ I won't be able to study templates in the near future. I have to attend to my University chores. I've been using Wikipedia as an excuse to avoid facing them, but this is really not very wise. I do wish to study templates, but it would just have to be postponed until my studies cool down a bit, which is not expected to happen in the near future. So i probably won't be in touch with you for a while. I hope you understand.  +++$+++ :::I won't be able to study templates in the near future. I have to attend to my University chores. I've been using Wikipedia as an excuse to avoid facing them, but this is really not very wise. I do wish to study templates, but it would just have to be postponed until my studies cool down a bit, which is not expected to happen in the near future. So i probably won't be in touch with you for a while. I hope you understand. [[User:Itayb|Itayb]] 09:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
538210 +++$+++ Itayb +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538206 +++$+++ 538209 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.174081380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for understanding. :)  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for understanding. :) [[User:Itayb|Itayb]] 14:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

13921 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-25 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.253920260E09 +++$+++ Hehe. I work fast, don't I? [[List of Song Emperors|Check it out]].--<strong> +++$+++ Hehe. I work fast, don't I? [[List of Song Emperors|Check it out]].--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 16:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
13922 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13921 +++$+++ 13921 +++$+++ 2009-09-25 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.253923560E09 +++$+++ Hmm. That is a very good question, and although I love to be consistent on most things, wouldn't that mean I would have to delete the current nomination and resubmit it as a different article? Or is there a way around that?--<strong> +++$+++ :Hmm. That is a very good question, and although I love to be consistent on most things, wouldn't that mean I would have to delete the current nomination and resubmit it as a different article? Or is there a way around that?--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 17:06, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

276066 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276066 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-07 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.181202120E09 +++$+++ Moe, look.  Your original heading of was not related to the discussion.  I chose a heading I feel is appropriate to the ensuing discussion.  If you're insulted, well... get over it, okay?  It's not an insult.  Really!  If I have to refer this to [[WP:3RR]] to get you to stop editing headings on my talk page, we can go that route.  Alternately, you can just leave it alone and get on with your life.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ Moe, look.  Your original heading of was not related to the discussion.  I chose a heading I feel is appropriate to the ensuing discussion.  If you're insulted, well... get over it, okay?  It's not an insult.  Really!  If I have to refer this to [[WP:3RR]] to get you to stop editing headings on my talk page, we can go that route.  Alternately, you can just leave it alone and get on with your life.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 00:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
276067 +++$+++ Moe Epsilon +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276066 +++$+++ 276066 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.181202600E09 +++$+++ 3RR applys to articles, generally not any place else, and 3RR would apply to you as well, not just me. Your just making yourself look like an ass when you changed, so I was actually trying to do you a favor and save you some face. \"Well, get over it\" isn't the answer, either. When someones offended at a statement, you should do you're best to not make it offensive, not continuing to do so because you don't like me. Personally your not my favorite person right now either, but you're first impression calling me a blatant liar didn't help you. I'm not going to change it again, I'll just accept the fact that you're violating policy and will revert war to do so. I suggest you not talk to me, for a long time. \u2014  +++$+++ :3RR applys to articles, generally not any place else, and 3RR would apply to you as well, not just me. Your just making yourself look like an ass when you changed, so I was actually trying to do you a favor and save you some face. "Well, get over it" isn't the answer, either. When someones offended at a statement, you should do you're best to not make it offensive, not continuing to do so because you don't like me. Personally your not my favorite person right now either, but you're first impression calling me a blatant liar didn't help you. I'm not going to change it again, I'll just accept the fact that you're violating policy and will revert war to do so. I suggest you not talk to me, for a long time. — [[User:Moe Epsilon|<font color="FF0000">M</font><font color="EE0000" >o</font><font color="DD0000">e</font>]] [[User talk:Moe Epsilon|<font color="0000FF">ε</font>]] 00:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
276068 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276066 +++$+++ 276067 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.181203920E09 +++$+++ 3RR can apply to any action taken by any editor on Wikipedia... it isn't just for article space. The goal is to help promote consensus by discussion. A user is also generally exempted from 3RR in their own user space. This is all outlined on [[WP:3RR]]; I wouldn't have mentioned it otherwise. If you feel I'm violating policy, feel free to [[WP:AN\/I|report me to an administrator]]. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :: 3RR can apply to any action taken by any editor on Wikipedia... it isn't just for article space. The goal is to help promote consensus by discussion. A user is also generally exempted from 3RR in their own user space. This is all outlined on [[WP:3RR]]; I wouldn't have mentioned it otherwise. If you feel I'm violating policy, feel free to [[WP:AN/I|report me to an administrator]]. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 01:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
276069 +++$+++ Moe Epsilon +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276066 +++$+++ 276068 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.181204820E09 +++$+++ I'll do you one better, I won't report you for violating [[WP:NPA]] yet saving you more face. I feel sorry for you, you have to resort to name-calling and snap judgements to resolve you're disputes. \u2014  +++$+++ :::I'll do you one better, I won't report you for violating [[WP:NPA]] yet saving you more face. I feel sorry for you, you have to resort to name-calling and snap judgements to resolve you're disputes. — [[User:Moe Epsilon|<font color="FF0000">M</font><font color="EE0000" >o</font><font color="DD0000">e</font>]] [[User talk:Moe Epsilon|<font color="0000FF">ε</font>]] 01:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
276070 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276066 +++$+++ 276069 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.181205360E09 +++$+++ Your charity is duly noted.  Now can we get back to ensuring that fair-use rationales are being placed on screenshots?  I've already corrected all the ones you've reported that aren't orphaned, by the way. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :::: Your charity is duly noted.  Now can we get back to ensuring that fair-use rationales are being placed on screenshots?  I've already corrected all the ones you've reported that aren't orphaned, by the way. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 01:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
276071 +++$+++ Moe Epsilon +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276066 +++$+++ 276070 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.181205600E09 +++$+++ Yes, we can, as long as you can avoid running to my talk page. \u2014  +++$+++ :::::Yes, we can, as long as you can avoid running to my talk page. — [[User:Moe Epsilon|<font color="FF0000">M</font><font color="EE0000" >o</font><font color="DD0000">e</font>]] [[User talk:Moe Epsilon|<font color="0000FF">ε</font>]] 01:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

538213 +++$+++ Patricknoddy +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-17 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.174154340E09 +++$+++ Your little welcome script is not working. -  +++$+++ Your little welcome script is not working. - [[User:Patricknoddy|'''Patricknoddy''']]<font color="#000000">[[User talk:Patricknoddy|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''TALK''' (reply here)</sup>]]</font><font color="#000000"><sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">|</sup></font><font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Patricknoddy|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''HISTORY'''</sup>]]</font> 10:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
538214 +++$+++ Patricknoddy +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538213 +++$+++ 538213 +++$+++ 2007-03-17 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.174173420E09 +++$+++ I just forgot to refresh my browser's cache. Does it work for cologne blue? -  +++$+++ :I just forgot to refresh my browser's cache. Does it work for cologne blue? - [[User:Patricknoddy|'''Patricknoddy''']]<font color="#000000">[[User talk:Patricknoddy|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''TALK''' (reply here)</sup>]]</font><font color="#000000"><sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">|</sup></font><font color="#000000">[[Special:Contributions/Patricknoddy|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''HISTORY'''</sup>]]</font> 16:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

276072 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-07 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.181265720E09 +++$+++ Yes, even you do. Save, rename, reupload. :D Other than that, no. -- +++$+++ Yes, even you do. Save, rename, reupload. :D Other than that, no. --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 18:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
276073 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276072 +++$+++ 276072 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.181266080E09 +++$+++ Just lemme kno if you need the older image be deleted. -- +++$+++ :Just lemme kno if you need the older image be deleted. --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 18:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

570300 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-01 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.209679020E09 +++$+++ What are\/were the concerns about using ambox in category space? -  +++$+++ What are/were the concerns about using ambox in category space? - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 14:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
570301 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.209679740E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 15:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
570302 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570301 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.209679920E09 +++$+++ Nothing besides that? -  +++$+++ ::Nothing besides that? - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 15:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
570303 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570302 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.209681300E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 15:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
570304 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570303 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.209681960E09 +++$+++ In addition, there are no technical concerns? -  +++$+++ ::::In addition, there are no technical concerns? - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 15:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
570305 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570304 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.209682440E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 15:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
570306 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.209684300E09 +++$+++ Would be willing to help with the creation of such an mbox? (While knowing that there is a chance it may not gain consensus.) -  +++$+++ :Would be willing to help with the creation of such an mbox? (While knowing that there is a chance it may not gain consensus.) - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 16:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
570307 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570306 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.209684900E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 16:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
570308 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570307 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.209686460E09 +++$+++ So this could be easily implemented as a simple switch in the single template. -  +++$+++ :::So this could be easily implemented as a simple switch in the single template. - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 17:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
570309 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570308 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.209688440E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 17:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
570310 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.209688980E09 +++$+++ (This seems too simple, I feel like I must be missing something.) -  +++$+++ :(This seems too simple, I feel like I must be missing something.) - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 17:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
570311 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570310 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.209693060E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 18:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
570312 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570311 +++$+++ 2008-05-02 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.209727380E09 +++$+++ If I start a sub-page somewhere, would you be willing to help? -  +++$+++ :::If I start a sub-page somewhere, would you be willing to help? - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 04:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
570313 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570300 +++$+++ 570312 +++$+++ 2008-05-02 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.209747120E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 09:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

276074 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-07 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.181266800E09 +++$+++ Hey, how do you get so many buttons in the [[:Image:Windows XP My Documents.png|My Docs window]]? -- +++$+++ Hey, how do you get so many buttons in the [[:Image:Windows XP My Documents.png|My Docs window]]? --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 18:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
276075 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276074 +++$+++ 276074 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.181267820E09 +++$+++ On the title bar?  That's from a program called [[Ultramon]], a really nice multi-monitor manager.  Dang... didn't even notice that!  It was one of my first image uploads. :)  I've fixed it. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : On the title bar?  That's from a program called [[Ultramon]], a really nice multi-monitor manager.  Dang... didn't even notice that!  It was one of my first image uploads. :)  I've fixed it. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 18:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

13931 +++$+++ Ahunt +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13931 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-13 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.263434340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing this article removing the PROD tag which I had put up. The article topic may be encyclopedic, but the article falls well short of Wikipedia's standards in many ways, as the tags show. If you can work on it and improve it that would be great. I'll come back to it in a month or two and see how it looks then. If it doesn't look any better perhaps it can be taken to [[WP:AFD]] at that point. -  +++$+++ Thanks for reviewing this article removing the PROD tag which I had put up. The article topic may be encyclopedic, but the article falls well short of Wikipedia's standards in many ways, as the tags show. If you can work on it and improve it that would be great. I'll come back to it in a month or two and see how it looks then. If it doesn't look any better perhaps it can be taken to [[WP:AFD]] at that point. - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 17:59, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
13932 +++$+++ Ahunt +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13931 +++$+++ 13931 +++$+++ 2010-01-13 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.263453060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your note. That would be great - my PROD was really a notice to get someone to fix it or lose it. As long as it gets improved I am happy. -  +++$+++ :Thanks for your note. That would be great - my PROD was really a notice to get someone to fix it or lose it. As long as it gets improved I am happy. - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 23:11, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

276077 +++$+++  +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-09 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.181383200E09 +++$+++ It is necessary to have both there, as both use different assessment systems. <span class=\"comment plainlinks\">(<span class=\"autocomment\">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} \u2192] +++$+++ It is necessary to have both there, as both use different assessment systems. <span class="comment plainlinks">(<span class="autocomment">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} →][[User:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zel</font>]][[User talk:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zany</font>]] -</span> [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Vishwin60 4|review]])</span> 03:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
276078 +++$+++  +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276077 +++$+++ 276077 +++$+++ 2007-06-09 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.181383320E09 +++$+++ Furthermore, it is acceptable to have both there, as the articles that I've tagged\/assessed ''are'' in the scope of WikiProject Computing as well as WikiProject Microsoft Windows. <span class=\"comment plainlinks\">(<span class=\"autocomment\">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} \u2192] +++$+++ :Furthermore, it is acceptable to have both there, as the articles that I've tagged/assessed ''are'' in the scope of WikiProject Computing as well as WikiProject Microsoft Windows. <span class="comment plainlinks">(<span class="autocomment">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} →][[User:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zel</font>]][[User talk:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zany</font>]] -</span> [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Vishwin60 4|review]])</span> 03:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
276079 +++$+++  +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276077 +++$+++ 276078 +++$+++ 2007-06-09 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.181383680E09 +++$+++ Please do not make personal attacks.  Furthermore, I've been through this before, see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California#Response(s) from Other WikiProject pages regarding removing WikiProject California tag]].  I've originally removed relevant tags from [[Talk:Interstate 80]] before, but now I understand that the article is in the scope of multiple WikiProjects, not just the main project, which is [[WP:IH]].  I've also found out that behaviour like that would imply [[WP:OWN]], and your revertions have implied owning the talk pages. <span class=\"comment plainlinks\">(<span class=\"autocomment\">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} \u2192] +++$+++ ::Please do not make personal attacks.  Furthermore, I've been through this before, see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California#Response(s) from Other WikiProject pages regarding removing WikiProject California tag]].  I've originally removed relevant tags from [[Talk:Interstate 80]] before, but now I understand that the article is in the scope of multiple WikiProjects, not just the main project, which is [[WP:IH]].  I've also found out that behaviour like that would imply [[WP:OWN]], and your revertions have implied owning the talk pages. <span class="comment plainlinks">(<span class="autocomment">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} →][[User:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zel</font>]][[User talk:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zany</font>]] -</span> [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Vishwin60 4|review]])</span> 03:08, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
276080 +++$+++  +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276077 +++$+++ 276079 +++$+++ 2007-06-09 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.181383980E09 +++$+++ To be more concise, [{{fullurl:Talk:Windows 2000|diff=136966749&oldid=136966168}} this] implies [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft Windows|WikiProject Microsoft Windows]] ownership of the article and talk page, which is entirely not true given the fact that '''''everyone''''' is entitled to edit constructively to Wikipedia. <span class=\"comment plainlinks\">(<span class=\"autocomment\">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} \u2192] +++$+++ :::To be more concise, [{{fullurl:Talk:Windows 2000|diff=136966749&oldid=136966168}} this] implies [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft Windows|WikiProject Microsoft Windows]] ownership of the article and talk page, which is entirely not true given the fact that '''''everyone''''' is entitled to edit constructively to Wikipedia. <span class="comment plainlinks">(<span class="autocomment">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} →][[User:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zel</font>]][[User talk:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zany</font>]] -</span> [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Vishwin60 4|review]])</span> 03:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
276081 +++$+++  +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276077 +++$+++ 276080 +++$+++ 2007-06-09 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.181386260E09 +++$+++ The main focal point right now is not about parent\/child relationships.  Even though WikiProject Microsoft Windows is a descendant of WikiProject Computing, you are taking articles away from that assessment system, unless if a merge of the Windows assessment system is proposed into the Computing assessment.  An example of what that merge would be like is located in [[WP:USRD\/A]], where multiple tags such as {{tl|U.S. Roads WikiProject}}, {{tl|Pennsylvania State Highway WikiProject}}, and {{tl|U.S. Interstate Highway WikiProject}} use the same system.  [{{fullurl:Talk:Pennsylvania Route 39|oldid=121525682}} I have been in this situation before when I have had to remove redundant tags].  I feel your pain, but it it best to keep both tags there until an acceptable agreement can be reached. <span class=\"comment plainlinks\">(<span class=\"autocomment\">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} \u2192] +++$+++ ::::The main focal point right now is not about parent/child relationships.  Even though WikiProject Microsoft Windows is a descendant of WikiProject Computing, you are taking articles away from that assessment system, unless if a merge of the Windows assessment system is proposed into the Computing assessment.  An example of what that merge would be like is located in [[WP:USRD/A]], where multiple tags such as {{tl|U.S. Roads WikiProject}}, {{tl|Pennsylvania State Highway WikiProject}}, and {{tl|U.S. Interstate Highway WikiProject}} use the same system.  [{{fullurl:Talk:Pennsylvania Route 39|oldid=121525682}} I have been in this situation before when I have had to remove redundant tags].  I feel your pain, but it it best to keep both tags there until an acceptable agreement can be reached. <span class="comment plainlinks">(<span class="autocomment">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} →][[User:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zel</font>]][[User talk:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zany</font>]] -</span> [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Vishwin60 4|review]])</span> 03:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
276082 +++$+++ JohnnyAlbert10 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276077 +++$+++ 276081 +++$+++ 2007-06-09 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.181386860E09 +++$+++ I concur with the above, there's nothing wrong with both tags, it's simply stating which two wikiprojects the article is part of. You don't need to make a big deal over this, it's the way the assessment works, until an agreement can be reached to change the way it works. -- ''' +++$+++ :::::I concur with the above, there's nothing wrong with both tags, it's simply stating which two wikiprojects the article is part of. You don't need to make a big deal over this, it's the way the assessment works, until an agreement can be reached to change the way it works. -- '''[[User:JohnnyAlbert10|<font color="red">J</font><font color="blue">A</font><font color="gray">10</font>]]''' <sup><font color="lime">[[User talk:JohnnyAlbert10|Discuss]]</font> • <font color="sky blue">[[Special:Contributions/JohnnyAlbert10|Edits]]</font></sup> 04:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
276083 +++$+++ Warrens +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276077 +++$+++ 276081 +++$+++ 2007-06-09 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.181452920E09 +++$+++ Just about every WikiProject Computing tag that was added to articles on Microsoft Windows was done in haphazard fashion by a bot, without ''any'' discussion.  WikiProject Microsoft Windows [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Microsoft Windows|has a talk page]], but it wasn't used to discuss the issue beforehand.  For cripes sake, the same bot run [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AMechagodzilla&diff=126510317&oldid=97246615 tagged] [[Mechagodzilla]]!  Why?  The whole situation is just bizarre.  Furthermore, no sensible, logical reason has been put forth for duplicating assessment efforts, and sorry if this offends people, but \"it's there now so please don't mess with it\" is not a sensible, logical reason.  If someone feels this is a good idea, they're welcome to explain why assessment efforts should be duplicated between parent\/child WikiProjects that have otherwise been separate efforts up to this point, and I'll probably get behind it.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warrens|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::::: Just about every WikiProject Computing tag that was added to articles on Microsoft Windows was done in haphazard fashion by a bot, without ''any'' discussion.  WikiProject Microsoft Windows [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Microsoft Windows|has a talk page]], but it wasn't used to discuss the issue beforehand.  For cripes sake, the same bot run [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMechagodzilla&diff=126510317&oldid=97246615 tagged] [[Mechagodzilla]]!  Why?  The whole situation is just bizarre.  Furthermore, no sensible, logical reason has been put forth for duplicating assessment efforts, and sorry if this offends people, but "it's there now so please don't mess with it" is not a sensible, logical reason.  If someone feels this is a good idea, they're welcome to explain why assessment efforts should be duplicated between parent/child WikiProjects that have otherwise been separate efforts up to this point, and I'll probably get behind it.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warrens|-/-]] [[User:Warrens|Warren]]</span> 22:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
276084 +++$+++  +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276077 +++$+++ 276083 +++$+++ 2007-06-09 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.181457960E09 +++$+++ \u2026and there's no reason why these assessment systems shouldn't be merged, either.  Either it's that or it's the Windows project [[WP:OWN|owning]] the talk page, as with [{{fullurl:Talk:Windows 2000|diff=136966749&oldid=136966168}} this]. <span class=\"comment plainlinks\">(<span class=\"autocomment\">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} \u2192] +++$+++ ::::::…and there's no reason why these assessment systems shouldn't be merged, either.  Either it's that or it's the Windows project [[WP:OWN|owning]] the talk page, as with [{{fullurl:Talk:Windows 2000|diff=136966749&oldid=136966168}} this]. <span class="comment plainlinks">(<span class="autocomment">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} →][[User:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zel</font>]][[User talk:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zany</font>]] -</span> [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Vishwin60 4|review]])</span> 23:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
276085 +++$+++ JohnnyAlbert10 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276077 +++$+++ 276084 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.181480040E09 +++$+++ Agreed with Vishwin60. If you want to change the way the assessment works, talk it over at the wikiproject, but you need to [[WP:COOL]] and stop personal attacking other users. -- ''' +++$+++ :::::::Agreed with Vishwin60. If you want to change the way the assessment works, talk it over at the wikiproject, but you need to [[WP:COOL]] and stop personal attacking other users. -- '''[[User:JohnnyAlbert10|<font color="red">J</font><font color="blue">A</font><font color="gray">10</font>]]''' <sup><font color="lime">[[User talk:JohnnyAlbert10|Discuss]]</font> • <font color="sky blue">[[Special:Contributions/JohnnyAlbert10|Edits]]</font></sup> 05:54, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
276086 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276077 +++$+++ 276085 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.181492760E09 +++$+++ This looks like a fair concern. Maintaining an article under multiple directly-related articles IMO is a waste of (human) resources. When an article is better described as something more specific han being computing related, its better scoped by a more specific Wikiproject. When something more specific is already there why trouble a more generic project. That would remove duplicated efforts from all Wikipeojects. May be we should formally discuss this at a central location with a view to drawing up a guideline to unify assessment systems (or specializing a parent project's guideline for use in descendant projects). This classification would also help in rationalizing the article load the parent project comes under. -- +++$+++ ::::::::This looks like a fair concern. Maintaining an article under multiple directly-related articles IMO is a waste of (human) resources. When an article is better described as something more specific han being computing related, its better scoped by a more specific Wikiproject. When something more specific is already there why trouble a more generic project. That would remove duplicated efforts from all Wikipeojects. May be we should formally discuss this at a central location with a view to drawing up a guideline to unify assessment systems (or specializing a parent project's guideline for use in descendant projects). This classification would also help in rationalizing the article load the parent project comes under. --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 09:26, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

538223 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-22 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.174619880E09 +++$+++ I switched from the hidden begin\/end templates which use NavFrame where you can't control the collapse state to just a table that collapses. I think we could make this a template (or figure out how to use the navbox templates that do basically the same thing). You can see the example at [[2007 Colorado Buffaloes football team]]. Using tables with the collapsible allowed to control the collapsed state and force it on\/off. -- +++$+++ I switched from the hidden begin/end templates which use NavFrame where you can't control the collapse state to just a table that collapses. I think we could make this a template (or figure out how to use the navbox templates that do basically the same thing). You can see the example at [[2007 Colorado Buffaloes football team]]. Using tables with the collapsible allowed to control the collapsed state and force it on/off. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 20:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
538224 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538223 +++$+++ 538223 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.174678440E09 +++$+++ I don't think we can fix the hidden begin. I know we could change it to use tables, but that may not be good for all uses, for some reason. I'm thinking making a new one like that, but we may be able to use an existing navbox form as well. I'm not very good with this area. -- +++$+++ :I don't think we can fix the hidden begin. I know we could change it to use tables, but that may not be good for all uses, for some reason. I'm thinking making a new one like that, but we may be able to use an existing navbox form as well. I'm not very good with this area. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 12:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
538225 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538223 +++$+++ 538224 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.174679220E09 +++$+++ Oh. Yah, that would be a much better way then I was thinking of. You can copy the code I did on the 2007 CU page, at least to get you started perhaps. -- +++$+++ ::Oh. Yah, that would be a much better way then I was thinking of. You can copy the code I did on the 2007 CU page, at least to get you started perhaps. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 12:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
538226 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538223 +++$+++ 538225 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.174683300E09 +++$+++ Looks good, but I kinda liked the colored header bar to tie in the header (now \"2007 Recruits\") and the show\/hide link. On my 1600x1200 the show\/hide is so far from the 2007 Recruits it doesn't seem connected. Colorizing the header might be a good idea to connect to two better. -- +++$+++ :::Looks good, but I kinda liked the colored header bar to tie in the header (now "2007 Recruits") and the show/hide link. On my 1600x1200 the show/hide is so far from the 2007 Recruits it doesn't seem connected. Colorizing the header might be a good idea to connect to two better. --[[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 13:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

264467 +++$+++ Crazypaco +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-26 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.206593520E09 +++$+++ JPS, I would like to thank you for your open minded debate on the deletion tag.  I thought you brought up excellent points that deserved to be debated\/addressed and I was extremely pleased that you were able to keep an open mind and reevaluated the article fairly after the recent edits.  I think that is not always the case among administrators and I just thought that you should commended for it. +++$+++ JPS, I would like to thank you for your open minded debate on the deletion tag.  I thought you brought up excellent points that deserved to be debated/addressed and I was extremely pleased that you were able to keep an open mind and reevaluated the article fairly after the recent edits.  I think that is not always the case among administrators and I just thought that you should commended for it.[[User:Crazypaco|cp101p]] ([[User talk:Crazypaco|talk]]) 21:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
264468 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264467 +++$+++ 264467 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.206642360E09 +++$+++ I'm sure it wasn't very good. And, no.  +++$+++ :I'm sure it wasn't very good. And, no. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

538228 +++$+++  +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.172009940E09 +++$+++ Ok, I have a first draft up at [[User:Nmajdan\/Test]]. Take a look at tell me what changes should still be made. Specifically, I'd like input on if I handled the NCAA (or NIT) tourneys appropriately. Also, I have two Asst Coach fields. They are both optional, and they could both handle multiple names. So if there are 2 asst coachs, put one name in each as I did. If there are three, put two in the first one and one in the second one, and so on. Also, if these changes are sufficient, I might be able to combine the basketball and football templates into one. We'll see.\u2194 +++$+++ Ok, I have a first draft up at [[User:Nmajdan/Test]]. Take a look at tell me what changes should still be made. Specifically, I'd like input on if I handled the NCAA (or NIT) tourneys appropriately. Also, I have two Asst Coach fields. They are both optional, and they could both handle multiple names. So if there are 2 asst coachs, put one name in each as I did. If there are three, put two in the first one and one in the second one, and so on. Also, if these changes are sufficient, I might be able to combine the basketball and football templates into one. We'll see.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]]&bull;[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:8px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">EditorReview</font>]] 14:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
538229 +++$+++ Disavian +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538228 +++$+++ 538228 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.172017140E09 +++$+++ It's looking great so far! I don't know too much about basketball, so I [[User talk:Excaliburhorn#NCAATeamFootballSeason|asked a friend]] that does. \u2014 +++$+++ :It's looking great so far! I don't know too much about basketball, so I [[User talk:Excaliburhorn#NCAATeamFootballSeason|asked a friend]] that does. —[[User:Disavian|Disavian]] ([[User talk:Disavian|<sup>talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Disavian|<sub>contribs</sub>]]) 16:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
538230 +++$+++ Disavian +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538228 +++$+++ 538228 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.174834440E09 +++$+++ Any news on this? If you're happy, we should go ahead and move it to template space and start using it. \u2014 +++$+++ :Any news on this? If you're happy, we should go ahead and move it to template space and start using it. —[[User:Disavian|Disavian]] ([[User talk:Disavian|<sup>talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Disavian|<sub>contribs</sub>]]) 07:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

13942 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-28 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.277764320E09 +++$+++ Why do you think it's a joke?  I seriously believe that it's not a realignment (there isn't a broken-apart conference; or a conference adding 4+ teams in one swoop), and that it really isn't that different from, say, 1992, which doesn't have its own conference expansion article.  Here and on other Wikipedias, articles about more noteworthy articles have been nominated for deletion, and some were even deleted '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Why do you think it's a joke?  I seriously believe that it's not a realignment (there isn't a broken-apart conference; or a conference adding 4+ teams in one swoop), and that it really isn't that different from, say, 1992, which doesn't have its own conference expansion article.  Here and on other Wikipedias, articles about more noteworthy articles have been nominated for deletion, and some were even deleted '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#3A003A">Pur</font><font color="#800080">ple</font>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#991C99">back</font><font color="#CC33CC">pack</font><font color="gold">89</font>]]</font>'''  15:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
13943 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13942 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-30 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.277937780E09 +++$+++ Since you asked...I'm displeased at the ESPN media circus around the issue (earlier this month, it was all expansion, [[Steven Strasburg]], and LeBron free agency); and that ESPN basically ''forced'' the Pac-10 to expand.  I prefer the traditional West Coast Pac-10, not having some backwater school like [[Utah Utes football|Utah]].  I'm displeased that basically an ESPN media circus has created an article '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::Since you asked...I'm displeased at the ESPN media circus around the issue (earlier this month, it was all expansion, [[Steven Strasburg]], and LeBron free agency); and that ESPN basically ''forced'' the Pac-10 to expand.  I prefer the traditional West Coast Pac-10, not having some backwater school like [[Utah Utes football|Utah]].  I'm displeased that basically an ESPN media circus has created an article '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#3A003A">Pur</font><font color="#800080">ple</font>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#991C99">back</font><font color="#CC33CC">pack</font><font color="gold">89</font>]]</font>'''  15:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

276087 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-10 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.181512080E09 +++$+++ ''(de-indent)'' If all you guys are going to contribute to the discussion are vague accusations of \"owning articles\" and \"personal attacks\", then I'm going to ignore you and carry on with improving the encyclopedia in a way I feel makes logical sense, and is in keeping with how other WikiProjects divvy up work. Please do let us know if there is an ''actual'' discussion about assessment systems that will be of interest to {{tl|WikiProject Microsoft Windows}}, on the project's talk page. As far as my talk page is concerned, this discussion is over. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ''(de-indent)'' If all you guys are going to contribute to the discussion are vague accusations of "owning articles" and "personal attacks", then I'm going to ignore you and carry on with improving the encyclopedia in a way I feel makes logical sense, and is in keeping with how other WikiProjects divvy up work. Please do let us know if there is an ''actual'' discussion about assessment systems that will be of interest to {{tl|WikiProject Microsoft Windows}}, on the project's talk page. As far as my talk page is concerned, this discussion is over. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 14:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
276088 +++$+++  +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276087 +++$+++ 276087 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.181521260E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, the encyclopedia is not about you.  Besides that, I am going to implement something on {{tl|WikiProject Microsoft Windows}} so that {{tl|WikiProject Computing}} won't have to be placed on talk pages.  Let me know if this is a sensible compromise. <span class=\"comment plainlinks\">(<span class=\"autocomment\">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} \u2192] +++$+++ :Unfortunately, the encyclopedia is not about you.  Besides that, I am going to implement something on {{tl|WikiProject Microsoft Windows}} so that {{tl|WikiProject Computing}} won't have to be placed on talk pages.  Let me know if this is a sensible compromise. <span class="comment plainlinks">(<span class="autocomment">[{{fullurl:User talk:Vishwin60|action=edit&section=new}} →][[User:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zel</font>]][[User talk:Vishwin60|<font color="gray">zany</font>]] -</span> [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Vishwin60 4|review]])</span> 17:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

13944 +++$+++ Parrot of Doom +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13944 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-13 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.279053180E09 +++$+++ There have been further replies to your comments on this FAC.  Would you mind taking a look, and commenting if possible? <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ There have been further replies to your comments on this FAC.  Would you mind taking a look, and commenting if possible? <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Parrot of Doom|Parrot]] [[User talk:Parrot of Doom|of Doom]]</span> 13:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
13945 +++$+++ Parrot of Doom +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13944 +++$+++ 13944 +++$+++ 2010-07-23 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.279935600E09 +++$+++ Are you going to comment?  It would be nice to even be acknowledged. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ :Are you going to comment?  It would be nice to even be acknowledged. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Parrot of Doom|Parrot]] [[User talk:Parrot of Doom|of Doom]]</span> 18:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

276091 +++$+++ Whitneykitty +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-12 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.181691480E09 +++$+++ Make sure you get the other two images, as they're from Apple.com as well. Great work dude, I like all the work you do on Windows stuff on wikipedia; very interesting that you were so worried over the OS X article. Thanks again though for keeping up on things! meow  +++$+++ Make sure you get the other two images, as they're from Apple.com as well. Great work dude, I like all the work you do on Windows stuff on wikipedia; very interesting that you were so worried over the OS X article. Thanks again though for keeping up on things! meow [[User:Whitneykitty|Whitneykitty]] 16:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
276092 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276091 +++$+++ 276091 +++$+++ 2007-06-12 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.181693040E09 +++$+++ I appreciate that, thanks... operating systems are an area of real interest for me so I want to see Wikipedia do well here, no matter which OS it is -- though I tend to like the \"new\" stuff the best, hence my interest in Vista, Server 2008 and OS X Leopard.  Please feel free to jump in and help!  There's a really good group of editors working on articles in this area (and while Nja247 and I may disagree on image use, I unreservedly include him in that) but there's still so much to be done. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : I appreciate that, thanks... operating systems are an area of real interest for me so I want to see Wikipedia do well here, no matter which OS it is -- though I tend to like the "new" stuff the best, hence my interest in Vista, Server 2008 and OS X Leopard.  Please feel free to jump in and help!  There's a really good group of editors working on articles in this area (and while Nja247 and I may disagree on image use, I unreservedly include him in that) but there's still so much to be done. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 17:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
276093 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276091 +++$+++ 276092 +++$+++ 2007-06-12 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.181693880E09 +++$+++ My take on the issue is at [[Talk:Mac OS X v10.5#Use of screenshots]] -- +++$+++ ::My take on the issue is at [[Talk:Mac OS X v10.5#Use of screenshots]] --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 17:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

538237 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-30 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.175245320E09 +++$+++ Hey. I noticed you got the assessments started off for the NFL WikiProject, which is great. I'm runnign the [[WP:BIGTEN|Big Ten WikiProject]], and am having some problems getting the assessments done properly. The categories up (such as Category:WikiProject Big Ten articles), and the assessments on the template work, but WP 1.0 bot won't begin sorting them in a table by quality. I'm not sre how to get that to happen, so if you could help me out that would be helpful. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hey. I noticed you got the assessments started off for the NFL WikiProject, which is great. I'm runnign the [[WP:BIGTEN|Big Ten WikiProject]], and am having some problems getting the assessments done properly. The categories up (such as Category:WikiProject Big Ten articles), and the assessments on the template work, but WP 1.0 bot won't begin sorting them in a table by quality. I'm not sre how to get that to happen, so if you could help me out that would be helpful. Thanks, [[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#0D0;background:#009">Wizardman</span>]] 02:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
538238 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538237 +++$+++ 538237 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.175247480E09 +++$+++ Awesome, thanks. I'm bad with the technical stuff so thanks for the help.-- +++$+++ :Awesome, thanks. I'm bad with the technical stuff so thanks for the help.--[[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#0D0;background:#009">Wizardman</span>]] 02:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
538239 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538237 +++$+++ 538237 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.175294100E09 +++$+++ Since you continue to delete my response on your talk page, I am adding it here.\u2194 +++$+++ :Since you continue to delete my response on your talk page, I am adding it here.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]•[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 15:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
538240 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538237 +++$+++ 538239 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.175292780E09 +++$+++ ''(moved here from his talk page)'' First of all, please remain [[WP:CIVIL|civil]]. I don't appreciate your remarks towards me. Also, I have not, personally, deleted anything. I am not an admin and so I cannot delete. It appears another editor reverted several of your edits where you blanked a significant portion of a page and I added the warnings to your talk page. Also, I tagged an article you created for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]] and it appears an administrator agreed with me and deleted the page. If you wish to contest the deletion, you may do so at [[WP:DRV|deletion review]]. If you have any further questions, please check out the [[WP:HD|help desk]]. Thank you.\u2194 +++$+++ ::''(moved here from his talk page)'' First of all, please remain [[WP:CIVIL|civil]]. I don't appreciate your remarks towards me. Also, I have not, personally, deleted anything. I am not an admin and so I cannot delete. It appears another editor reverted several of your edits where you blanked a significant portion of a page and I added the warnings to your talk page. Also, I tagged an article you created for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]] and it appears an administrator agreed with me and deleted the page. If you wish to contest the deletion, you may do so at [[WP:DRV|deletion review]]. If you have any further questions, please check out the [[WP:HD|help desk]]. Thank you.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]•[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 15:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
538241 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538237 +++$+++ 538237 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.175294160E09 +++$+++ You are moving my user page and another user's page. I have the right to revert your vandalism on my page. If you have an issue with the article you created that was subsequently deleted, please bring it up at [[WP:DRV|deletion review]]. You are only hurting your chances by continuing in this manner. Thank you.\u2194 +++$+++ :You are moving my user page and another user's page. I have the right to revert your vandalism on my page. If you have an issue with the article you created that was subsequently deleted, please bring it up at [[WP:DRV|deletion review]]. You are only hurting your chances by continuing in this manner. Thank you.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]•[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 15:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

276095 +++$+++ Nja247 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276095 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-17 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.182105060E09 +++$+++ I see you added a no rationale tag to this image. You mentioned on the Leopard talk page that one image would be acceptable, so why not take a moment and add the rationale yourself? You seem to have investigated this issue more thoroughly, and by you doing it yourself there would be a proper rationale and the issue as a whole would be resolved. Just a thought. I posted a similar comment on the Mac OS X v10.5 talk page.   +++$+++ I see you added a no rationale tag to this image. You mentioned on the Leopard talk page that one image would be acceptable, so why not take a moment and add the rationale yourself? You seem to have investigated this issue more thoroughly, and by you doing it yourself there would be a proper rationale and the issue as a whole would be resolved. Just a thought. I posted a similar comment on the Mac OS X v10.5 talk page.  [[User:Nja247|Nja247]] ([[User talk:Nja247|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nja247|contribs]]) 11:31, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
276096 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276095 +++$+++ 276095 +++$+++ 2007-06-17 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.182137820E09 +++$+++ I left a note on the uploader's talk page to add the rationale to.  It's really the uploder's responsibility to do this, and it's a good habit for all uploaders of fair-use images to be in. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : I left a note on the uploader's talk page to add the rationale to.  It's really the uploder's responsibility to do this, and it's a good habit for all uploaders of fair-use images to be in. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 20:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

607630 +++$+++ Exploding Boy +++$+++ Exploding Boy +++$+++ 607630 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-15 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.150406700E09 +++$+++ No, that's not a workable solution, as I explained above.   +++$+++ No, that's not a workable solution, as I explained above.  [[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]] 14:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
607631 +++$+++ Sergeant Snopake +++$+++ Exploding Boy +++$+++ 607630 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.150407360E09 +++$+++ Why not? This 'thinly veiled' nonsense - if you've read it so much you can start making assumptions about it, can't you just start respecting it and leaving him alone? Why is this all about you: 'I have no problem wih you'? There would be no problem if you would just '''leave him alone'''. Oh, and my names not 'Sergeant', it's 'Sergeant Snopake'.  +++$+++ ::Why not? This 'thinly veiled' nonsense - if you've read it so much you can start making assumptions about it, can't you just start respecting it and leaving him alone? Why is this all about you: 'I have no problem wih you'? There would be no problem if you would just '''leave him alone'''. Oh, and my names not 'Sergeant', it's 'Sergeant Snopake'. [[User:Sergeant Snopake|Sergeant Snopake]] 14:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

276097 +++$+++ Tyomitch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-18 08:09:00 +++$+++ 1.182179340E09 +++$+++ That's why I took the liberty to replace it. -- +++$+++ That's why I took the liberty to replace it. --[[User:Tyomitch|tyomitch]] 08:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
276098 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276097 +++$+++ 276097 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.182181260E09 +++$+++ Screenshots of operating systems that aren't intended to demonstrate a specific feature should show the default desktop without any additional applications; an exception is usually made for Windows Explorer since a major part of the shell.  A cluttered desktop hinders what we are trying to accomplish by providing a screenshot, and we need to try to keep things as simple as possible.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Screenshots of operating systems that aren't intended to demonstrate a specific feature should show the default desktop without any additional applications; an exception is usually made for Windows Explorer since a major part of the shell.  A cluttered desktop hinders what we are trying to accomplish by providing a screenshot, and we need to try to keep things as simple as possible.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 08:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

13954 +++$+++ Ncjon +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13954 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-28 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.306626420E09 +++$+++ You recently moved the [[University of North Carolina Wilmington]] page to one that is not its correct proper name. I was unable to revert the move and ask that you do so. Thanks.  +++$+++ You recently moved the [[University of North Carolina Wilmington]] page to one that is not its correct proper name. I was unable to revert the move and ask that you do so. Thanks. [[User:Ncjon|Ncjon]] ([[User talk:Ncjon|talk]]) 16:47, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
13955 +++$+++ Beach drifter +++$+++ Rreagan007 +++$+++ 13954 +++$+++ 13954 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.306638240E09 +++$+++ Ncjon is correct, the official name is The University of North Carolina Wilmington. Please revert your move and check that redirects such as [[UNCW]] and [[UNC-Wilmington]] point to the correct name as it appears a bot may have changed those as a result of a double redirect you created.  +++$+++ :Ncjon is correct, the official name is The University of North Carolina Wilmington. Please revert your move and check that redirects such as [[UNCW]] and [[UNC-Wilmington]] point to the correct name as it appears a bot may have changed those as a result of a double redirect you created. [[User:Beach drifter|Beach drifter]] ([[User talk:Beach drifter|talk]]) 20:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

276099 +++$+++ Tyomitch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276099 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-18 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.182181920E09 +++$+++ ## Most OS screenshots, even in the infoboxes of their respective articles, show default applications as well. See e.g. [[Kubuntu]], [[BeOS]], [[Windows 2.0]] and many others. -- +++$+++ ## Most OS screenshots, even in the infoboxes of their respective articles, show default applications as well. See e.g. [[Kubuntu]], [[BeOS]], [[Windows 2.0]] and many others. --[[User:Tyomitch|tyomitch]] 08:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
276100 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276099 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.182206160E09 +++$+++ It's really important that non-free screenshots ''only'' include stuff that is being discussed in the article.  A good solution would be to write some more content into the article that describes (in detail) the things that are being shown.  Talk about included applications with that version of the OS, user interface features that are newly introduced or unique, put up a screenshot beside that text, and make sure that screenshot has a fair-use rationale which justifies its inclusion in the encyclopedia.  It's a lot of extra work, but that's what we are expected to do.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::: It's really important that non-free screenshots ''only'' include stuff that is being discussed in the article.  A good solution would be to write some more content into the article that describes (in detail) the things that are being shown.  Talk about included applications with that version of the OS, user interface features that are newly introduced or unique, put up a screenshot beside that text, and make sure that screenshot has a fair-use rationale which justifies its inclusion in the encyclopedia.  It's a lot of extra work, but that's what we are expected to do.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 15:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
276101 +++$+++ Tyomitch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276099 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.182208680E09 +++$+++ Also, for the record, [[Mac OS 8]] displays a web browser, which is hardly an integral part of its shell. As for more examples: [[RISC OS]], [[NEXTSTEP]], [[IRIX]], [[AmigaOS]], [[System 7]] all show cluttered desktops, too. (As if that mattered.) -- +++$+++ ::::Also, for the record, [[Mac OS 8]] displays a web browser, which is hardly an integral part of its shell. As for more examples: [[RISC OS]], [[NEXTSTEP]], [[IRIX]], [[AmigaOS]], [[System 7]] all show cluttered desktops, too. (As if that mattered.) --[[User:Tyomitch|tyomitch]] 16:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
276102 +++$+++ Tyomitch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276099 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-19 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.182289920E09 +++$+++ Another thing to note: the screenshot in [[Windows 2000]] had once been replaced with a screenshot displaying running applications; and it had been reverted not because it was cluttered, but because the screenshot was taken from a site permitting non-commercial use only. It follows that there are other people preferring \"cluttered\" desktops over empty ones; I have to conclude that there's no evidence of any accepted guidelines telling that the screenshots \"should show the default desktop without any additional applications\". -- +++$+++ ::::Another thing to note: the screenshot in [[Windows 2000]] had once been replaced with a screenshot displaying running applications; and it had been reverted not because it was cluttered, but because the screenshot was taken from a site permitting non-commercial use only. It follows that there are other people preferring "cluttered" desktops over empty ones; I have to conclude that there's no evidence of any accepted guidelines telling that the screenshots "should show the default desktop without any additional applications". --[[User:Tyomitch|tyomitch]] 14:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

538246 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538246 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-02 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.175509080E09 +++$+++ Hi again. I was wondering if you would be interested in being an admin. I think you'd make a great candidate. So long as you're not in any disputes now it would surely go smoothly. Just let me know if you wish for me to nom you.-- +++$+++ Hi again. I was wondering if you would be interested in being an admin. I think you'd make a great candidate. So long as you're not in any disputes now it would surely go smoothly. Just let me know if you wish for me to nom you.--[[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#0D0;background:#006">Wizardman</span>]] 03:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
538247 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538246 +++$+++ 538246 +++$+++ 2007-04-02 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.175558220E09 +++$+++ Apparently I was a little late, lol. I'll certainly co-nom you though.-- +++$+++ :Apparently I was a little late, lol. I'll certainly co-nom you though.--[[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#0D0;background:#006">Wizardman</span>]] 16:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

276103 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276103 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-20 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.182342480E09 +++$+++ I forked off the TFS section in VSTS to its own article. Hope that is okay with you. I am planning significant expansion of the TFS article and TFS integration with VS in the VSTS article. I thought keeping TFS stuff in TFS article and the integration stuff (integrated management UI in VSTS) in the VSTS article is the most logical arrangement. What do you think? -- +++$+++ I forked off the TFS section in VSTS to its own article. Hope that is okay with you. I am planning significant expansion of the TFS article and TFS integration with VS in the VSTS article. I thought keeping TFS stuff in TFS article and the integration stuff (integrated management UI in VSTS) in the VSTS article is the most logical arrangement. What do you think? --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 05:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
276104 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276103 +++$+++ 276103 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.182347340E09 +++$+++ Sure... I wasn't planning on updating the article much until the next version comes out (which is probably another 6 months away), since there will be a bunch more to say about TFS at that point.  The other part is figuring out how much goes in the main Visual Studio article, and how much goes in the VSTS article... though, there will also be more to say about VSTS at that point too, I guess.  Unless, of course, the marketing wizards at MS decide to make our job as encyclopedia writers a bit more of a pain by renaming everything yet again. ;-)  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Sure... I wasn't planning on updating the article much until the next version comes out (which is probably another 6 months away), since there will be a bunch more to say about TFS at that point.  The other part is figuring out how much goes in the main Visual Studio article, and how much goes in the VSTS article... though, there will also be more to say about VSTS at that point too, I guess.  Unless, of course, the marketing wizards at MS decide to make our job as encyclopedia writers a bit more of a pain by renaming everything yet again. ;-)  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 06:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

13960 +++$+++ C5mjohn +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-24 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.287961800E09 +++$+++ Are we sure that George Frater's quotation of Richard Baldwin is well sourced? I hope he didn't just rip it off the internet. His book doesn't show a source for that quote. +++$+++ Are we sure that George Frater's quotation of Richard Baldwin is well sourced? I hope he didn't just rip it off the internet. His book doesn't show a source for that quote.[[User:C5mjohn|C5mjohn]] ([[User talk:C5mjohn|talk]]) 16:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
13961 +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13960 +++$+++ 13960 +++$+++ 2010-10-25 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.288003740E09 +++$+++ If you do a Google book search for the quotation, i think you will find it in multiple books. Hard to imagine that a lot of folks are putting out books with a false quote, when it is such a well-known and for some, controversial quotation. It exists in books supportive of the ACLU, and in books critical of the ACLU. But beyond that, i haven't done any additional research. best wishes,  +++$+++ :If you do a Google book search for the quotation, i think you will find it in multiple books. Hard to imagine that a lot of folks are putting out books with a false quote, when it is such a well-known and for some, controversial quotation. It exists in books supportive of the ACLU, and in books critical of the ACLU. But beyond that, i haven't done any additional research. best wishes, [[User:Richard Myers|Richard Myers]] ([[User talk:Richard Myers#top|talk]]) 03:49, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

276105 +++$+++ 72.91.234.57 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-21 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.182433860E09 +++$+++ You added the WikiProject Microsoft Windows tag to several image talk pages such as [[Image_talk:Windows_Longhorn_Build_3683.png]]. These are images not articles.  +++$+++ You added the WikiProject Microsoft Windows tag to several image talk pages such as [[Image_talk:Windows_Longhorn_Build_3683.png]]. These are images not articles. [[User:72.91.234.57|72.91.234.57]] 06:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
276106 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276105 +++$+++ 276105 +++$+++ 2007-06-21 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.182456540E09 +++$+++ .... and? <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : .... and? <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 13:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

13963 +++$+++ Gandydancer +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13963 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-12 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.289553840E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/www.loc.gov\/pictures\/resource\/ppmsc.01851\/  http:\/\/www.loc.gov\/pictures\/resource\/fsa.8d16015\/  This one is \"traqueros\".   +++$+++ http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/ppmsc.01851/  http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/fsa.8d16015/  This one is "traqueros".  [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]] ([[User talk:Gandydancer|talk]]) 01:24, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
13964 +++$+++ Gandydancer +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13963 +++$+++ 13963 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.301091240E09 +++$+++ Hi and good to have you back!  Re your recent additions of info about working conditions:  As you know, I had hoped for this sort of information, however what would you think about putting it more into block form rather than divide it into 8 paragraphs as you have done?  This is hard for me to exactly put my finger on...it seems that perhaps the way you have presented it sets it apart from the reading of the rest of the article, somehow suggesting that it is more important.  Also, would you consider moving it down in the article?   +++$+++ :Hi and good to have you back!  Re your recent additions of info about working conditions:  As you know, I had hoped for this sort of information, however what would you think about putting it more into block form rather than divide it into 8 paragraphs as you have done?  This is hard for me to exactly put my finger on...it seems that perhaps the way you have presented it sets it apart from the reading of the rest of the article, somehow suggesting that it is more important.  Also, would you consider moving it down in the article?  [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]] ([[User talk:Gandydancer|talk]]) 15:14, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
13965 +++$+++ Gandydancer +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13963 +++$+++ 13964 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.301112000E09 +++$+++ Yes, I like that much better.  Also, I see you did not move it and that now seems OK to me as well.  The previous paragraph introduces the term \"maintenance of the way\" workers, which is new to me and I would assume most people.  +++$+++ ::Yes, I like that much better.  Also, I see you did not move it and that now seems OK to me as well.  The previous paragraph introduces the term "maintenance of the way" workers, which is new to me and I would assume most people. [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]] ([[User talk:Gandydancer|talk]]) 21:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

13966 +++$+++ Gandydancer +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13966 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-29 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.291071660E09 +++$+++ I have asked for help adding photos from a friend in Wales.  He's smart, a photographer, and computer-savvy, but he's never edited wikipedia and I am afraid that I may have asked too much of him.  Any comments would sure be welcome!  Comments on the article would be appreciated, as well.   +++$+++ I have asked for help adding photos from a friend in Wales.  He's smart, a photographer, and computer-savvy, but he's never edited wikipedia and I am afraid that I may have asked too much of him.  Any comments would sure be welcome!  Comments on the article would be appreciated, as well.  [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]] ([[User talk:Gandydancer|talk]]) 15:01, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
13967 +++$+++ Gandydancer +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13966 +++$+++ 13966 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.295000520E09 +++$+++ Hi there,  I watched this film tonight on our local \"Maine Experience\" TV program and thought of you.  http:\/\/video.google.com\/videoplay?docid=3312747776420574927#  Best, Gandy  +++$+++ :Hi there,  I watched this film tonight on our local "Maine Experience" TV program and thought of you.  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3312747776420574927#  Best, Gandy [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]] ([[User talk:Gandydancer|talk]]) 02:22, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

276112 +++$+++ RN +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-25 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.182771420E09 +++$+++ Hey Warrens - looks like you are still around after all this time :):).  Anyway, what do you think about this move? Accoding to Microsoft's page it is just Windows and even all the logos say Windows now... the Windows article has a bit of history though so you'd probably need an admin to help out.  +++$+++ Hey Warrens - looks like you are still around after all this time :):).  Anyway, what do you think about this move? Accoding to Microsoft's page it is just Windows and even all the logos say Windows now... the Windows article has a bit of history though so you'd probably need an admin to help out. [[User:RN|RN]] 04:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
276113 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276112 +++$+++ 276112 +++$+++ 2007-06-25 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.182802200E09 +++$+++ Interesting question... I'm a bit hesitant to go ahead with that because there's a lot of (real-world) history around the name \"Microsoft Windows\", and there's a lot of conflicting evidence around whether the name really has changed to simply, \"Windows\".  We could dig up examples and counter-examples all day (e.g. typing \"ver\" at a Vista command prompt says \"Microsoft Windows\", and looking at the \"About\" in Notepad shows the Windows Vista logo in large print, but underneath says \"Microsoft Windows\".  Whether Microsoft's web site minimises the use of the word \"Microsoft\" is a simple copy-editing decision or a change in underlying policy is hard to say.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Interesting question... I'm a bit hesitant to go ahead with that because there's a lot of (real-world) history around the name "Microsoft Windows", and there's a lot of conflicting evidence around whether the name really has changed to simply, "Windows".  We could dig up examples and counter-examples all day (e.g. typing "ver" at a Vista command prompt says "Microsoft Windows", and looking at the "About" in Notepad shows the Windows Vista logo in large print, but underneath says "Microsoft Windows".  Whether Microsoft's web site minimises the use of the word "Microsoft" is a simple copy-editing decision or a change in underlying policy is hard to say.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 13:10, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
276114 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276112 +++$+++ 276113 +++$+++ 2007-06-25 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.182803460E09 +++$+++ Hasnt it been like this, since, maybe inception of Windows? They have used Windows and Microsoft Windows interchangably in the documentation. -- +++$+++ ::Hasnt it been like this, since, maybe inception of Windows? They have used Windows and Microsoft Windows interchangably in the documentation. --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 13:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
276115 +++$+++ RN +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276112 +++$+++ 276114 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.182851760E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... I guess it is rather ambiguous.  The main logo does say just \"Windows\" though. Thanks Warrens :).  +++$+++ :::Hmmm... I guess it is rather ambiguous.  The main logo does say just "Windows" though. Thanks Warrens :). [[User:RN|RN]] 02:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

538257 +++$+++ Belovedfreak +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538257 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.175889180E09 +++$+++ Hi, I have added a fair use rationale to this image. Please could you tell me if it is enough? Thanks  +++$+++ Hi, I have added a fair use rationale to this image. Please could you tell me if it is enough? Thanks [[User:Belovedfreak|Belovedfreak]] 12:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
538258 +++$+++ Belovedfreak +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538257 +++$+++ 538257 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.175890620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your help. [[User:Belovedfreak|Belovedfreak]] 13:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

13970 +++$+++ Collect +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-03 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.301855880E09 +++$+++ A query regarding your apparent violation of [[WP:CANVASS]] has been posted at [[WP:AN\/I]]. Cheers.  +++$+++ A query regarding your apparent violation of [[WP:CANVASS]] has been posted at [[WP:AN/I]]. Cheers. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 11:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
13971 +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13970 +++$+++ 13970 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.301856960E09 +++$+++ noted.  +++$+++ :noted. [[User:Richard Myers|Richard Myers]] ([[User talk:Richard Myers#top|talk]]) 11:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

276116 +++$+++ Tyomitch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-26 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.182861720E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Windows 3.1.png]] has been added to the article today. Now be consistent and delete it in the same way as you deleted mine. -- +++$+++ [[:Image:Windows 3.1.png]] has been added to the article today. Now be consistent and delete it in the same way as you deleted mine. --[[User:Tyomitch|tyomitch]] 05:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
276117 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276116 +++$+++ 276116 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.183061280E09 +++$+++ Done.  In the future, do it yourself -- you're aware of the non-free content policy, and you're expected to follow it. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Done.  In the future, do it yourself -- you're aware of the non-free content policy, and you're expected to follow it. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 13:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

13973 +++$+++ Jayron32 +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-25 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.303734240E09 +++$+++ At [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Request_for_guidance_on_policy]], you have made a complete mischaracterization of my position.  I have neither supported nor opposed the position in question, so I would like for you to remove my name from your count entirely.  -- +++$+++ At [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Request_for_guidance_on_policy]], you have made a complete mischaracterization of my position.  I have neither supported nor opposed the position in question, so I would like for you to remove my name from your count entirely.  --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 05:24, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
13974 +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13973 +++$+++ 13973 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.303734540E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ :Done. [[User:Richard Myers|Richard Myers]] ([[User talk:Richard Myers#top|talk]]) 05:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
13975 +++$+++ Jayron32 +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13973 +++$+++ 13974 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.303734600E09 +++$+++ Merci beaucoup.  -- +++$+++ ::Merci beaucoup.  --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 05:30, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

538263 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-09 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.176165960E09 +++$+++ '''So I don't have to spam everybody's talk page, a big thanks to all those that supported my RfA!'''\u2194 +++$+++ '''So I don't have to spam everybody's talk page, a big thanks to all those that supported my RfA!'''↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:11px; font-weight:bold; font-family:verdana, sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]•[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font-size:9px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000000;">talk</font>]] 17:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
538264 +++$+++ Alison +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538263 +++$+++ 538263 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.176166380E09 +++$+++ Congratulations!! Another much needed sysop :) -  +++$+++ * Congratulations!! Another much needed sysop :) - [[User:Alison|<font face="comic sans ms" color="green">Alison</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Alison|☺]]</sup> 17:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
538265 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538263 +++$+++ 538263 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.176168120E09 +++$+++ A big congratulatory [[Hook 'em Horns|Hook 'em]] from  +++$+++ * A big congratulatory [[Hook 'em Horns|Hook 'em]] from [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 18:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
538266 +++$+++ Z4ns4tsu +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538263 +++$+++ 538263 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.176177060E09 +++$+++ Oh, John, that hurts! ;) Gratz, NMjadan, and good luck as a sysop. <font style=\"color:#1e90ff;font-weight:bold\"> +++$+++ *Oh, John, that hurts! ;) Gratz, NMjadan, and good luck as a sysop. <font style="color:#1e90ff;font-weight:bold">[[User:Z4ns4tsu|z4ns4tsu]]</font>\<sup><font style="color:black;">[[User_talk:Z4ns4tsu|talk]]</font></sup> 20:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
538267 +++$+++ VirtualSteve +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538263 +++$+++ 538263 +++$+++ 2007-04-09 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.176184080E09 +++$+++ Congratulations from downunder.-- +++$+++ * Congratulations from downunder.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 22:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

13976 +++$+++ Ohconfucius +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-26 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.303810380E09 +++$+++ I feel deeply for your problem, but note that there are many many advantages of compressing refs, least of all for maintenance purposes. If you are working on an article you recently created, I would suggest that you might avoid the problems you are experiencing by keeping it in userspace until it is in an advanced state. Alternatively, using {{tl|nobots}} on the page will stop bots from visiting your page. When dealing with a 'compressed' article, instead of reverting, you can still locate the 'mother' of a compressed ref by performing a string search; if you dislike the 'autogenerated1912' you can always search and replace such strings with more meaningful names. Regards, -- +++$+++ I feel deeply for your problem, but note that there are many many advantages of compressing refs, least of all for maintenance purposes. If you are working on an article you recently created, I would suggest that you might avoid the problems you are experiencing by keeping it in userspace until it is in an advanced state. Alternatively, using {{tl|nobots}} on the page will stop bots from visiting your page. When dealing with a 'compressed' article, instead of reverting, you can still locate the 'mother' of a compressed ref by performing a string search; if you dislike the 'autogenerated1912' you can always search and replace such strings with more meaningful names. Regards, --[[User:Ohconfucius|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 02:33, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
13977 +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13976 +++$+++ 13976 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.303812420E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks. I am not strongly opposed to compressing refs, if it is accomplished at the right time (after article completion), and in the right way (that is, without \"ambushing\" editors working on an article). Thanks for the suggestions. best wishes,  +++$+++ :Hi, thanks. I am not strongly opposed to compressing refs, if it is accomplished at the right time (after article completion), and in the right way (that is, without "ambushing" editors working on an article). Thanks for the suggestions. best wishes, [[User:Richard Myers|Richard Myers]] ([[User talk:Richard Myers#top|talk]]) 03:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

13980 +++$+++ Lockley +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310694900E09 +++$+++ Richard, thanks for your word of support on that new [[Template:American Labor Conflicts]].  I was simply surprised that nothing like this existed yet, so I created it.  Looks like you know your stuff so I appreciate the thumbs-up.  -- +++$+++ Richard, thanks for your word of support on that new [[Template:American Labor Conflicts]].  I was simply surprised that nothing like this existed yet, so I created it.  Looks like you know your stuff so I appreciate the thumbs-up.  --[[User:Lockley|Lockley]] ([[User talk:Lockley|talk]]) 18:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
13981 +++$+++ Lockley +++$+++ Richard Myers +++$+++ 13980 +++$+++ 13980 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311171840E09 +++$+++ ...and received your suggestion about adding two Labor Detectives, consider it done.  Thanks for the thought.  I see your traces more and more, with great respect for the work you've done here.  all best!  -- +++$+++ :...and received your suggestion about adding two Labor Detectives, consider it done.  Thanks for the thought.  I see your traces more and more, with great respect for the work you've done here.  all best!  --[[User:Lockley|Lockley]] ([[User talk:Lockley|talk]]) 07:24, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

497645 +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ 497645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.167731640E09 +++$+++ Sure. The templates to be untranscluded are [[Template:20 Largest Airlines by Fleet Size as of December 20, 2006]], and [[Template:Month disambig]]. The noms are found on the main TfD page under the December 20th and 18th subsectyions, respectively. You can close the noms if you want, or let me do it once the templates are orphaned, your call. Either way, thanks a lot for the help. Best Reagrds,  +++$+++ Sure. The templates to be untranscluded are [[Template:20 Largest Airlines by Fleet Size as of December 20, 2006]], and [[Template:Month disambig]]. The noms are found on the main TfD page under the December 20th and 18th subsectyions, respectively. You can close the noms if you want, or let me do it once the templates are orphaned, your call. Either way, thanks a lot for the help. Best Reagrds, [[User:RyanGerbil10|RyanGerbil10]]<small>[[User_talk:RyanGerbil10|(Упражнение В!)]]</small> 01:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
497646 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ RyanGerbil10 +++$+++ 497645 +++$+++ 497645 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.167732960E09 +++$+++ OK, great, I'll close them. \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ :OK, great, I'll close them. —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets501]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 02:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

could not match вasil
538272 +++$+++ вasil +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-12 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.176420240E09 +++$+++ Hi Nmajdan, I'm having a problem with a template {{t1|WikiProject Alabama}} I'm working on and could use your help. I'm getting a spurious \"<nowiki>}}<\/nowiki>\" at the bottom when the template is invoked. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Nmajdan, I'm having a problem with a template {{t1|WikiProject Alabama}} I'm working on and could use your help. I'm getting a spurious "<nowiki>}}</nowiki>" at the bottom when the template is invoked. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, [[User:Вasil|<font style="font-weight:bold; color:darkgreen;">''Вasil''</font>]] | <small>[[User talk:Вasil|''talk'']]</small> 16:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
could not match вasil
538273 +++$+++ вasil +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538272 +++$+++ 538272 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.176424260E09 +++$+++ You're the Man! Thanks a lot. I followed your advice on removing the auto-categorization code. BTW, congrats on making Admin, it's well deserved.  +++$+++ :You're the Man! Thanks a lot. I followed your advice on removing the auto-categorization code. BTW, congrats on making Admin, it's well deserved. [[User:Вasil|<font style="font-weight:bold; color:darkgreen;">''Вasil''</font>]] | <small>[[User talk:Вasil|''talk'']]</small> 17:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

89712 +++$+++ Arnabdas +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89712 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-19 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.195522440E09 +++$+++ Hi, I wanted your interpretation on something. You wrote on my talk page a while back about what vandalism is or is not. To my understanding, if a person makes a POV statement but does so without the intent to it is NOT vandalism correct? Also, it seems if someone wants to address a point and makes a good faith effort to make it less POV worded, that should not be considered vandalism correct? Should the person get a warning for offerring personal analysis when the effort was in good faith to make it less POV? Furthermore, if someone keeps hurling accusations of someone pushing a POV, yet does not engage in a civil discussion about the alleged abuse when the accused wishes to defend him or herself, does that count as abuse?  +++$+++ Hi, I wanted your interpretation on something. You wrote on my talk page a while back about what vandalism is or is not. To my understanding, if a person makes a POV statement but does so without the intent to it is NOT vandalism correct? Also, it seems if someone wants to address a point and makes a good faith effort to make it less POV worded, that should not be considered vandalism correct? Should the person get a warning for offerring personal analysis when the effort was in good faith to make it less POV? Furthermore, if someone keeps hurling accusations of someone pushing a POV, yet does not engage in a civil discussion about the alleged abuse when the accused wishes to defend him or herself, does that count as abuse? [[User:Arnabdas|Arnabdas]] ([[User talk:Arnabdas|talk]]) 17:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
89713 +++$+++ Arnabdas +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89712 +++$+++ 89712 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.195525740E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your prompt response. [[User: Blaxthos|Blaxthos]] had given me two warnings but refused to address the issue of the arguments I made. When he objected to my characterization of Media Matters being liberal, I changed the statement to say that they usually did not criticize conservatives or independents to sound more NPOV. He then issued a warning to me saying that I was in violation of NPOV, despite my good faith effort. I asked for a response but never got one. Then he reverted another statement of mine on another article over the same issue...giving me a warning again without response to what I said. From what I can tell, you may personally have a POV on an issue that seems to agree with him, but looking at the facts of it do you feel his warnings to me were justified? Thanks again for the civil discussion.  +++$+++ :Thank you for your prompt response. [[User: Blaxthos|Blaxthos]] had given me two warnings but refused to address the issue of the arguments I made. When he objected to my characterization of Media Matters being liberal, I changed the statement to say that they usually did not criticize conservatives or independents to sound more NPOV. He then issued a warning to me saying that I was in violation of NPOV, despite my good faith effort. I asked for a response but never got one. Then he reverted another statement of mine on another article over the same issue...giving me a warning again without response to what I said. From what I can tell, you may personally have a POV on an issue that seems to agree with him, but looking at the facts of it do you feel his warnings to me were justified? Thanks again for the civil discussion. [[User:Arnabdas|Arnabdas]] ([[User talk:Arnabdas|talk]]) 18:29, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
89714 +++$+++ Arnabdas +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89712 +++$+++ 89713 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.195695660E09 +++$+++ Hi Hal, thanks again for your words. I do want to point out that I am committed to putting forth a good article that doesnt have POV wording in it. However, I also feel that POV shouldn't be expected by others as well. I just wanted a discussion of the topic, that's all. Blaxthos just edited the page and did not acknowledge my counter-argument for wording it the way I did. In the end, I want an honest depiction of it all...whether it goes for or against my own POV. I take this editing seriously; it is our duty to provide accurate and impartial information. However, I did write on the talk page why I felt the way I did and why his edit was pushing a POV on his part. I am not trying to pick a fight with anyone...I honestly felt he has been trying to pick a fight with me for some reason though...simply because he hasnt engaged in a discussion with me yet has just been warning happy.  +++$+++ ::Hi Hal, thanks again for your words. I do want to point out that I am committed to putting forth a good article that doesnt have POV wording in it. However, I also feel that POV shouldn't be expected by others as well. I just wanted a discussion of the topic, that's all. Blaxthos just edited the page and did not acknowledge my counter-argument for wording it the way I did. In the end, I want an honest depiction of it all...whether it goes for or against my own POV. I take this editing seriously; it is our duty to provide accurate and impartial information. However, I did write on the talk page why I felt the way I did and why his edit was pushing a POV on his part. I am not trying to pick a fight with anyone...I honestly felt he has been trying to pick a fight with me for some reason though...simply because he hasnt engaged in a discussion with me yet has just been warning happy. [[User:Arnabdas|Arnabdas]] ([[User talk:Arnabdas|talk]]) 17:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

276132 +++$+++ GnuTurbo +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-15 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.189899600E09 +++$+++ Hi.  There are still no sources to back up the claim of a Crestline chipset being present inside the new iMac.  Instead, the disputed info about the new iMacs being Santa Rosa (supported by many sources) is being relied upon by editors who actually disagree with that info to draw the (so far un-sourced) conclusion a Crestline chipset lives inside the new iMac.  It would be cool to have some reliable sources for this latter claim if it going to be found on Wikipedia. - +++$+++ Hi.  There are still no sources to back up the claim of a Crestline chipset being present inside the new iMac.  Instead, the disputed info about the new iMacs being Santa Rosa (supported by many sources) is being relied upon by editors who actually disagree with that info to draw the (so far un-sourced) conclusion a Crestline chipset lives inside the new iMac.  It would be cool to have some reliable sources for this latter claim if it going to be found on Wikipedia. -[[User:GnuTurbo|GnuTurbo]] 16:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
276133 +++$+++ GnuTurbo +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276132 +++$+++ 276132 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.189902420E09 +++$+++ I have proposed a compromise for the [[Template talk:Apple hardware since 1998#MacBook Pro (Mid 2007) \/ iMac (Mid 2007) compromise|Apple hardware since 1998]] template. - +++$+++ : I have proposed a compromise for the [[Template talk:Apple hardware since 1998#MacBook Pro (Mid 2007) / iMac (Mid 2007) compromise|Apple hardware since 1998]] template. -[[User:GnuTurbo|GnuTurbo]] 17:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

538277 +++$+++ Vesperholly +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538277 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-14 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.176569880E09 +++$+++ I am the photographer and released them under GDFL licenses. I don't understand why these images ought to be deleted. If there is a version existing in Commons, please replace it, and don't just delete outright. Thanks.  +++$+++ I am the photographer and released them under GDFL licenses. I don't understand why these images ought to be deleted. If there is a version existing in Commons, please replace it, and don't just delete outright. Thanks. [[User:Vesperholly|Vesperholly]] 09:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
538278 +++$+++ Vesperholly +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538277 +++$+++ 538277 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.176606360E09 +++$+++ The images were being used on [[Figure skating spins]]. That \"What links here\" link in the toolbox would've told you where the image is used. Thanks. :)  +++$+++ :The images were being used on [[Figure skating spins]]. That "What links here" link in the toolbox would've told you where the image is used. Thanks. :) [[User:Vesperholly|Vesperholly]] 20:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
538279 +++$+++ Vesperholly +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538277 +++$+++ 538278 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.176823800E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks.  +++$+++ ::OK, thanks. [[User:Vesperholly|Vesperholly]] 08:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

276134 +++$+++ Nja247 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-15 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.189907100E09 +++$+++ There's an ongoing dispute with an anon and myself regarding the correct terminology (Santa Rosa or Crestline) for the MacBook Pro's and Intel iMac's. If you have a second read over the last few replies on the [[Intel iMac]] talk page and let me know if I'm being ridiculous or not. However in summary, the anon feels even mentioning Santa Rosa is wrong, though his Wikilink for Crestline links to the Santa Rosa platform. Other points are made on both sides, just have a look as I value your opinion on other matters in the past. Cheers mate.  +++$+++ There's an ongoing dispute with an anon and myself regarding the correct terminology (Santa Rosa or Crestline) for the MacBook Pro's and Intel iMac's. If you have a second read over the last few replies on the [[Intel iMac]] talk page and let me know if I'm being ridiculous or not. However in summary, the anon feels even mentioning Santa Rosa is wrong, though his Wikilink for Crestline links to the Santa Rosa platform. Other points are made on both sides, just have a look as I value your opinion on other matters in the past. Cheers mate. [[User:Nja247|Nja247]] ([[User talk:Nja247|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nja247|contribs]]) 18:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
276135 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276134 +++$+++ 276134 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.190746980E09 +++$+++ And for your information, neither of us, who keep the Microsoft articles free of idiotic open source zealotry and pointless bashing, are paid by Microsoft. -- +++$+++ :And for your information, neither of us, who keep the Microsoft articles free of idiotic open source zealotry and pointless bashing, are paid by Microsoft. --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 12:03, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
276136 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276134 +++$+++ 276134 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.190976240E09 +++$+++ Surely your time would be better spent improving your English grammar than criticising people you don't know.  Also, Microsoft doesn't pay me, and I use Macs for most of my personal stuff.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Surely your time would be better spent improving your English grammar than criticising people you don't know.  Also, Microsoft doesn't pay me, and I use Macs for most of my personal stuff.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 03:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

276142 +++$+++ PEJL +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-20 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.192900920E09 +++$+++ Hi there. Would you mind self-reverting [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=In_Rainbows&curid=8642505&diff=165811123&oldid=165807571 this change]. There is an AMG review now. (I'm trying to keep my revert count down because I find it hard to keep track of for fast-changing articles such as this.) Thanks in advance. -- +++$+++ Hi there. Would you mind self-reverting [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=In_Rainbows&curid=8642505&diff=165811123&oldid=165807571 this change]. There is an AMG review now. (I'm trying to keep my revert count down because I find it hard to keep track of for fast-changing articles such as this.) Thanks in advance. --[[User:PEJL|PEJL]] 10:22, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
276143 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276142 +++$+++ 276142 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.192910460E09 +++$+++ I don't see a review on allmusic's web site at the provided link, so, no.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : I don't see a review on allmusic's web site at the provided link, so, no.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 13:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
276144 +++$+++ PEJL +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276142 +++$+++ 276143 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.192913820E09 +++$+++ Maybe your browser is over-aggressively caching the page. The review is up. It starts with: \"In Rainbows, as a title, implies a sense of comfort and delightfulness. Symbolically, rainbows are more likely to be...\" -- +++$+++ ::Maybe your browser is over-aggressively caching the page. The review is up. It starts with: "In Rainbows, as a title, implies a sense of comfort and delightfulness. Symbolically, rainbows are more likely to be..." --[[User:PEJL|PEJL]] 13:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
276145 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276142 +++$+++ 276144 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.192914060E09 +++$+++ No, it's not an issue with my browser.  The review isn't there.  If it ''was'' there, it's gone now.  Continue this on [[Talk:In Rainbows]], please.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::: No, it's not an issue with my browser.  The review isn't there.  If it ''was'' there, it's gone now.  Continue this on [[Talk:In Rainbows]], please.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 14:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

538287 +++$+++ Galanskov +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-22 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.177236060E09 +++$+++ Recently you revoked the semi-protection of the [[Ancient Rome]] article, citing the rules about not using semi-protection as a preemptive measure or to prevent editing by those not using an account. Please go through the history section of this article and take a look at how much vandalism this article received prior to its semi-protection. As you will see, it was getting attacked on a daily basis, and sometimes large chuncks of text were lost for months due to reverters not being careful. In fact, only a few hours after it was unprotected, the article was vandalized. I'll let it go unprotected for a few days, but if it gets vandalized at the same rate that it used to be (which I strongly suspect will be the case), I'm going to put another request for semi-protection in. This is a high traffic article, and it needs protection.  +++$+++ Recently you revoked the semi-protection of the [[Ancient Rome]] article, citing the rules about not using semi-protection as a preemptive measure or to prevent editing by those not using an account. Please go through the history section of this article and take a look at how much vandalism this article received prior to its semi-protection. As you will see, it was getting attacked on a daily basis, and sometimes large chuncks of text were lost for months due to reverters not being careful. In fact, only a few hours after it was unprotected, the article was vandalized. I'll let it go unprotected for a few days, but if it gets vandalized at the same rate that it used to be (which I strongly suspect will be the case), I'm going to put another request for semi-protection in. This is a high traffic article, and it needs protection. [[User:Galanskov|Galanskov]] 03:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
538288 +++$+++ Galanskov +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538287 +++$+++ 538287 +++$+++ 2007-04-22 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.177266060E09 +++$+++ The vandalism so far has already caused problems with text being momentarily lost, so I've gone ahead and put in a request for semi-protection. In the meantime it is worth noting that you did not discuss this at the article talk page prior to acting, thus failing to ensure that you had consensus for the revocation. Please do not repeat this mistake in the future.  +++$+++ :The vandalism so far has already caused problems with text being momentarily lost, so I've gone ahead and put in a request for semi-protection. In the meantime it is worth noting that you did not discuss this at the article talk page prior to acting, thus failing to ensure that you had consensus for the revocation. Please do not repeat this mistake in the future. [[User:Galanskov|Galanskov]] 11:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

276146 +++$+++ Flyguy649 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-20 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.192922280E09 +++$+++ I'm posting this here because it's not related to the article. About the AMG review, have you bypassed your browser's cache? That could explain why you're not seeing the review. And I agree that the quality of the review is ... odd. Cheers! --  +++$+++ I'm posting this here because it's not related to the article. About the AMG review, have you bypassed your browser's cache? That could explain why you're not seeing the review. And I agree that the quality of the review is ... odd. Cheers! -- [[User:Flyguy649|Flyguy649]] [[User talk:Flyguy649|<sup>talk]]</sup> 16:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
276147 +++$+++ Flyguy649 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276146 +++$+++ 276146 +++$+++ 2007-10-20 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.192922400E09 +++$+++ I just saw the thread above... sorry about that. Remove if you'd like. Anyway, I'm using Firefox, and I see the review fine today, although it wasn't up about 10 hours ago. --  +++$+++ :I just saw the thread above... sorry about that. Remove if you'd like. Anyway, I'm using Firefox, and I see the review fine today, although it wasn't up about 10 hours ago. -- [[User:Flyguy649|Flyguy649]] [[User talk:Flyguy649|<sup>talk]]</sup> 16:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

276148 +++$+++ Sdfisher +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276148 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-26 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.193442780E09 +++$+++ Generally I'm with you on using is instead of was. However, I think that particular sentence doesn't make scan for me this way. I don't think the tense needs to change, but something else needs to change as a result of the tense change. Maybe the sentence needs to be broken up. I'm not actually sure, or I'd just do it. Can you have another look, please? -- +++$+++ Generally I'm with you on using is instead of was. However, I think that particular sentence doesn't make scan for me this way. I don't think the tense needs to change, but something else needs to change as a result of the tense change. Maybe the sentence needs to be broken up. I'm not actually sure, or I'd just do it. Can you have another look, please? --[[User:Sdfisher|Steven Fisher]] 16:53, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
276149 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276148 +++$+++ 276148 +++$+++ 2007-10-26 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.193454300E09 +++$+++ Give it some thought, and maybe poke around some other areas of the encyclopedia for inspiration.  Let's see if we can find a good approach that we can apply to hardware and software articles alike.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Give it some thought, and maybe poke around some other areas of the encyclopedia for inspiration.  Let's see if we can find a good approach that we can apply to hardware and software articles alike.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 20:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

276150 +++$+++ Althepal +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-26 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.193462940E09 +++$+++ Hi. I'm just here to tell you that while it is true that it is and always will be, for example, \"the fifth release of mac os x,\" both words (is and was) are true and both are correct. However, the connotation must also be taken into account, and \"is\" gives the impression of \"latest and greatest,\" while \"was\" tells the person there is something newer. Also, there is no concern of people thinking that \"it was the fifth release but it isn't the fifth release anymore,\" because this information is self-evident and not stated otherwise. I'm not going to bother reverting all your edits because you might just revert further (even though that would be against the 3-revert rule), but I'm asking '''you''' to revert your edits. Just consider the natural flow of reading and writing.  +++$+++ Hi. I'm just here to tell you that while it is true that it is and always will be, for example, "the fifth release of mac os x," both words (is and was) are true and both are correct. However, the connotation must also be taken into account, and "is" gives the impression of "latest and greatest," while "was" tells the person there is something newer. Also, there is no concern of people thinking that "it was the fifth release but it isn't the fifth release anymore," because this information is self-evident and not stated otherwise. I'm not going to bother reverting all your edits because you might just revert further (even though that would be against the 3-revert rule), but I'm asking '''you''' to revert your edits. Just consider the natural flow of reading and writing. [[User:Althepal|Althepal]] 22:29, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
276151 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276150 +++$+++ 276150 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.193468580E09 +++$+++ We're an encyclopedia.  It's really important for us to be as precise, accurate, and consistent as possible.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : We're an encyclopedia.  It's really important for us to be as precise, accurate, and consistent as possible.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 00:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
276152 +++$+++ Althepal +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276150 +++$+++ 276151 +++$+++ 2007-10-28 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.193562720E09 +++$+++ That's true, but if it is an article about someone who is no longer alive, yet who's works are continued to be read, you use the past tense. Even if Tiger is still used, it isn't still in production. I see your point, and I can tell you see mine, but I still feel and think that \"was\" would be more appropriate for a non-current OS, for the primary reason that it makes it clear at the start that it isn't the most recent one shipping with computers (and it isn't incorrect either). If it says \"this is the fifth release,\" I think it is the current one. If it says \"this was the fifth release,\" I understand right away that it's not the latest release, and I bet that's the way many people think. It's more likely to give the correct impression, and it is accurate, and perhaps even more precise than \"is\" (because it limits the time). That's my view. Perhaps a vote can be held somewhere.  +++$+++ ::That's true, but if it is an article about someone who is no longer alive, yet who's works are continued to be read, you use the past tense. Even if Tiger is still used, it isn't still in production. I see your point, and I can tell you see mine, but I still feel and think that "was" would be more appropriate for a non-current OS, for the primary reason that it makes it clear at the start that it isn't the most recent one shipping with computers (and it isn't incorrect either). If it says "this is the fifth release," I think it is the current one. If it says "this was the fifth release," I understand right away that it's not the latest release, and I bet that's the way many people think. It's more likely to give the correct impression, and it is accurate, and perhaps even more precise than "is" (because it limits the time). That's my view. Perhaps a vote can be held somewhere. [[User:Althepal|Althepal]] 02:12, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

546802 +++$+++  +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546802 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-20 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.250761380E09 +++$+++ What's your take on this? \u2014 <span style='font:bold 1.0em \"Apple Garamond\",\"Adobe Garamond Pro\",Garamond,serif;color:#369;'> +++$+++ What's your take on this? — <span style='font:bold 1.0em "Apple Garamond","Adobe Garamond Pro",Garamond,serif;color:#369;'>[[User:DoriSmith|Dori]] ❦ ([[User talk:DoriSmith|Talk]] ❖ [[Special:Contributions/DoriSmith|Contribs]] ❖ [[WP:Editor review/DoriSmith|Review]]) ❦</span> 02:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
546803 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546802 +++$+++ 546802 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.250769660E09 +++$+++ Dori, Yikes, thanks for bringing this to my attention. I should have looked into this deeper. I was completely unaware that this user had a previous history with copyright violations on Wikipedia. Let me look into this. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Dori, Yikes, thanks for bringing this to my attention. I should have looked into this deeper. I was completely unaware that this user had a previous history with copyright violations on Wikipedia. Let me look into this. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 05:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
546804 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546802 +++$+++ 546803 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.250772060E09 +++$+++ I have indefinitely blocked Hemant 17 for the copyright violations. The sockpuppetry case seems pretty open and shut. If you can, please list the sockpuppetry case at [[WP:SPI]]. I'll add my commeents there. Thanks. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::I have indefinitely blocked Hemant 17 for the copyright violations. The sockpuppetry case seems pretty open and shut. If you can, please list the sockpuppetry case at [[WP:SPI]]. I'll add my commeents there. Thanks. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 05:41, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
546805 +++$+++  +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546802 +++$+++ 546804 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.250852280E09 +++$+++ Okay, I've written it up at [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations\/Hemant]] and notified all the accounts listed above. I'd appreciate your input over there, and thanks! \u2014 <span style='font:bold 1.0em \"Apple Garamond\",\"Adobe Garamond Pro\",Garamond,serif;color:#369;'> +++$+++ :::Okay, I've written it up at [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Hemant]] and notified all the accounts listed above. I'd appreciate your input over there, and thanks! — <span style='font:bold 1.0em "Apple Garamond","Adobe Garamond Pro",Garamond,serif;color:#369;'>[[User:DoriSmith|Dori]] ❦ ([[User talk:DoriSmith|Talk]] ❖ [[Special:Contributions/DoriSmith|Contribs]] ❖ [[WP:Editor review/DoriSmith|Review]]) ❦</span> 03:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546806 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546802 +++$+++ 546805 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 06:38:00 +++$+++ 1.250861880E09 +++$+++ Great. I added my comments there. I wasn't certain about two of the users -- but including them as you did is fine. The clerks and admins at SPI can make the call. Thanks for following though on this. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::::Great. I added my comments there. I wasn't certain about two of the users -- but including them as you did is fine. The clerks and admins at SPI can make the call. Thanks for following though on this. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 06:38, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

276154 +++$+++ tqbf +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-31 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.193816340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:tqbf|<font color="black" face="courier">--- tqbf</font>]] 00:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
276155 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276154 +++$+++ 276154 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.193817780E09 +++$+++ You stop making edits that clearly contravene [[WP:V]], and I'll stop reverting them.  How's that for a solution? <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : You stop making edits that clearly contravene [[WP:V]], and I'll stop reverting them.  How's that for a solution? <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 01:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
276156 +++$+++ tqbf +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276154 +++$+++ 276155 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.193818020E09 +++$+++ FWIW, since we're not going to resolve this ourselves, I've simply referred this to the 3RR noticeboard; your last rv was your 4th in 24 hours. Sorry for not signing the previous comment!  +++$+++ :: FWIW, since we're not going to resolve this ourselves, I've simply referred this to the 3RR noticeboard; your last rv was your 4th in 24 hours. Sorry for not signing the previous comment! [[User:tqbf|<font color="black" face="courier">--- tqbf</font>]] 01:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
276157 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276154 +++$+++ 276156 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.193818320E09 +++$+++ Warren, you're being attacked [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2F3RR&diff=168209369&oldid=168205487 here].  None of your reverts qualify under 3RR rules.  Give it a break Tqbf.   +++$+++ :::Warren, you're being attacked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2F3RR&diff=168209369&oldid=168205487 here].  None of your reverts qualify under 3RR rules.  Give it a break Tqbf.  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 01:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
276158 +++$+++ tqbf +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276154 +++$+++ 276157 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.193818740E09 +++$+++ Sorry, assumed from the barnstars he could find the 3RR noticeboard himself, but was probably bad form not to cite it.  +++$+++ :::: Sorry, assumed from the barnstars he could find the 3RR noticeboard himself, but was probably bad form not to cite it. [[User:tqbf|<font color="black" face="courier">--- tqbf</font>]] 01:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

14015 +++$+++ SoniaSyle +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-12 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.273703880E09 +++$+++ You changed the title without consensus. A title change is a very serious step and should have been arrived at through consensus. I will have to take this to ANI.  +++$+++ You changed the title without consensus. A title change is a very serious step and should have been arrived at through consensus. I will have to take this to ANI. [[User:SoniaSyle|SoniaSyle]] ([[User talk:SoniaSyle|talk]]) 15:38, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
14016 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14015 +++$+++ 14015 +++$+++ 2010-05-12 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.273704000E09 +++$+++ Go ahead. ''' +++$+++ :Go ahead. '''[[User:Pyrrhus16|<font color="black">Pyrrhus</font>]]'''[[User talk:Pyrrhus16|<font color="#FF0000">16</font>]]''' 15:40, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

538304 +++$+++ Bluedog423 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-04 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.178338740E09 +++$+++ Hope these suggestions help.  Good luck! - +++$+++ Hope these suggestions help.  Good luck! -[[User:Bluedog423|Bluedog423]]<sup>[[User talk:Bluedog423|Talk]]</sup> 21:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
538305 +++$+++ Bluedog423 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538304 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-10 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.178790720E09 +++$+++ Your reply is well taken. You don't need to apologize for disagreeing with some of my points.  Obviously, many of my suggestions are personal preference, and everybody has a different opinion, so there really is no perfect article.  Those were just my impressions from having spent considerable time writing a university article myself, but others, of course, may disagree.  I think the article is probably ready for FA nomination.  Although, I have to be honest and I didn't carefully read the entire article for prose issues, so I wouldn't be able to support it without taking a more detailed look; but at the same time, I have no reason to oppose it either.  Also, while you point to other FAs as guidelines (which is obviously a good idea, and a strategy I employed frequently), some commentators reply that FA standards have gotten stricter and just because one article got by with some apparent error, doesn't mean that this article should.  I know that argument is annoying, but just wanted to warn you that some people use it because I had to deal with things like that during the Duke FA process.  Good luck!  It is obvious a considerable amount of work has gone into the article. - +++$+++ ::Your reply is well taken. You don't need to apologize for disagreeing with some of my points.  Obviously, many of my suggestions are personal preference, and everybody has a different opinion, so there really is no perfect article.  Those were just my impressions from having spent considerable time writing a university article myself, but others, of course, may disagree.  I think the article is probably ready for FA nomination.  Although, I have to be honest and I didn't carefully read the entire article for prose issues, so I wouldn't be able to support it without taking a more detailed look; but at the same time, I have no reason to oppose it either.  Also, while you point to other FAs as guidelines (which is obviously a good idea, and a strategy I employed frequently), some commentators reply that FA standards have gotten stricter and just because one article got by with some apparent error, doesn't mean that this article should.  I know that argument is annoying, but just wanted to warn you that some people use it because I had to deal with things like that during the Duke FA process.  Good luck!  It is obvious a considerable amount of work has gone into the article. -[[User:Bluedog423|Bluedog423]]<sup>[[User talk:Bluedog423|Talk]]</sup> 02:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

14017 +++$+++ JuneGloom07 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-12 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.273704300E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you've been working on the article. Just a quick note, the Character development section usually comes before the storylines section. Are you planning to try and get the article up to GA status at some point? :) -  +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you've been working on the article. Just a quick note, the Character development section usually comes before the storylines section. Are you planning to try and get the article up to GA status at some point? :) - [[User:JuneGloom07|<font color="Purple" face="Arial">'''JuneGloom07'''</font>]]  [[User_Talk:JuneGloom07|<font color="Green" face="Times New Roman">Talk? </font>]] 15:45, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
14018 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14017 +++$+++ 14017 +++$+++ 2010-05-12 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.273706880E09 +++$+++ Yes, I do hope to get it to GA status in the future. :) [[WP:MOSTV]] states that for fictional characters, their storylines should come first, and then the information on their creation and characterization. It makes more sense to read about what storylines the character has been involved in, before going into the production of it all. The same style is used for articles on books, films and television shows\/episodes. ''' +++$+++ :Yes, I do hope to get it to GA status in the future. :) [[WP:MOSTV]] states that for fictional characters, their storylines should come first, and then the information on their creation and characterization. It makes more sense to read about what storylines the character has been involved in, before going into the production of it all. The same style is used for articles on books, films and television shows/episodes. '''[[User:Pyrrhus16|<font color="black">Pyrrhus</font>]]'''[[User talk:Pyrrhus16|<font color="#FF0000">16</font>]]''' 16:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

538307 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538307 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-10 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.178852460E09 +++$+++ Hello, I hope you are doing well.  Over at [[2005 Oklahoma vs. Texas football game]] I have put in the OU template that OU defeated the Ducks in the Holiday Bowl, but that info does not seem to show up.  I must be doing something wrong but I can't figure out what.  Can you take a look, please?  Thanks!  +++$+++ Hello, I hope you are doing well.  Over at [[2005 Oklahoma vs. Texas football game]] I have put in the OU template that OU defeated the Ducks in the Holiday Bowl, but that info does not seem to show up.  I must be doing something wrong but I can't figure out what.  Can you take a look, please?  Thanks! [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 20:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
538308 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538307 +++$+++ 538307 +++$+++ 2007-05-10 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.178854200E09 +++$+++ Ah, much better, thank you.  I notice that the stadium names still do not show though.  Maybe that is a similar problem?  +++$+++ *Ah, much better, thank you.  I notice that the stadium names still do not show though.  Maybe that is a similar problem? [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 20:30, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
538309 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538307 +++$+++ 538308 +++$+++ 2007-05-10 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.178854980E09 +++$+++ Sweet.  Thank you!  +++$+++ **Sweet.  Thank you! [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 20:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

14021 +++$+++ Suomi Finland 2009 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-16 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.274050860E09 +++$+++ Consider looking at the John Lennon article.  It's basic structure is better.  You can dislike the exact order but it is not like a diary found in the Madonna article.  Her film and music career is the most important part of her life and should be separated out.  Rather than do and and you reverting it, how about commenting about this idea?  Or do you prefer reverting each other and keeping a little bit (most people are not so giving but revert the entirety).  +++$+++ Consider looking at the John Lennon article.  It's basic structure is better.  You can dislike the exact order but it is not like a diary found in the Madonna article.  Her film and music career is the most important part of her life and should be separated out.  Rather than do and and you reverting it, how about commenting about this idea?  Or do you prefer reverting each other and keeping a little bit (most people are not so giving but revert the entirety). [[User:Suomi Finland 2009|Suomi Finland 2009]] ([[User talk:Suomi Finland 2009|talk]]) 16:01, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
14022 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14021 +++$+++ 14021 +++$+++ 2010-05-17 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.274111460E09 +++$+++ Addressed the [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Madonna (entertainer)\/archive1|FAC concerns]]. <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :Addressed the [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Madonna (entertainer)/archive1|FAC concerns]]. <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 08:51, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

526625 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-18 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.174286640E09 +++$+++ Thanks, pretty cool.  Hey, I just finished [[Puerto Ricans in World War II]].  Do you want to look it over and do the proper fixes?  I would really be grateful.   +++$+++ Thanks, pretty cool.  Hey, I just finished [[Puerto Ricans in World War II]].  Do you want to look it over and do the proper fixes?  I would really be grateful.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 23:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
526626 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526625 +++$+++ 526625 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.174290420E09 +++$+++ Here's a better link for Cordero Davila [http:\/\/209.85.165.104\/search?q=cache:a3p-6x5sPHkJ:www.prari.org\/th65th.pdf+Juan+Cesar+Cordero+Davila&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us&ie=UTF-8].. It seems as if most of the PR's served in Europe, but I'll be investigating their participation in Asia.  +++$+++ *Here's a better link for Cordero Davila [http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:a3p-6x5sPHkJ:www.prari.org/th65th.pdf+Juan+Cesar+Cordero+Davila&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us&ie=UTF-8].. It seems as if most of the PR's served in Europe, but I'll be investigating their participation in Asia. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
526627 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526625 +++$+++ 526625 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.174295580E09 +++$+++ \"Dates out of order\" Oops! May mistake.  That's why I come to you, you find things that I overlook. Thanks  +++$+++ :"Dates out of order" Oops! May mistake.  That's why I come to you, you find things that I overlook. Thanks [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
526628 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526625 +++$+++ 526625 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.174385520E09 +++$+++ You are right about the intro.  I got in touch with a military historian friend of mine, who lives in PR and he told me that the 295th and 296th Infantry Regiments of the Puerto Rican National did not \"really\" serve in the Pacific as almost every website state (These sites state that these units served in the Pacific, but they do not say where). I wanted him to tell me where they served and he told me that the 295th served in Panama and the 296th was sent to Hawaii (he even provided a source).  The thing that I would like to find out is if there are any stats anywhere that will tell me how many PR's served in the USMC, USN or the USA in the Pacific.  +++$+++ *You are right about the intro.  I got in touch with a military historian friend of mine, who lives in PR and he told me that the 295th and 296th Infantry Regiments of the Puerto Rican National did not "really" serve in the Pacific as almost every website state (These sites state that these units served in the Pacific, but they do not say where). I wanted him to tell me where they served and he told me that the 295th served in Panama and the 296th was sent to Hawaii (he even provided a source).  The thing that I would like to find out is if there are any stats anywhere that will tell me how many PR's served in the USMC, USN or the USA in the Pacific. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
526629 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526625 +++$+++ 526625 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.174388760E09 +++$+++ Forget \"Los Barrabases\" you can strike that one out because it is about the childhood of Brig. Gen, Luis Esteves. In regard to \"\xa1Los Soldados Son As\xed!\" the site is :http:\/\/bellsouthpwp.net\/r\/u\/ruiz_b\/LuisRaulEsteves\/los_soldados_son_asi.htm \"Los Soldados Son As\xed! by General Luis Ra\xfal Esteves, Star Publishing Co.,San Juan, Puerto Rico, Published in 1955. In the book, he tells many antidotes, jokes, and stories of Puerto Rican soldiers, covering the period from when the ancient regiment from Puerto Rico were organized up to the Second World War.  +++$+++ :Forget "Los Barrabases" you can strike that one out because it is about the childhood of Brig. Gen, Luis Esteves. In regard to "¡Los Soldados Son Así!" the site is :http://bellsouthpwp.net/r/u/ruiz_b/LuisRaulEsteves/los_soldados_son_asi.htm "Los Soldados Son Así! by General Luis Raúl Esteves, Star Publishing Co.,San Juan, Puerto Rico, Published in 1955. In the book, he tells many antidotes, jokes, and stories of Puerto Rican soldiers, covering the period from when the ancient regiment from Puerto Rico were organized up to the Second World War. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 04:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
526630 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526625 +++$+++ 526625 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.174472520E09 +++$+++ Thanks, you're a real trooper.  I don't I'll be adding anything new for now.  Stats in regard to how many PR's served in \"regular\" units (USMC,USN and USA) were not kept at that time.   +++$+++ *Thanks, you're a real trooper.  I don't I'll be adding anything new for now.  Stats in regard to how many PR's served in "regular" units (USMC,USN and USA) were not kept at that time.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

14024 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-22 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.274584080E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your meticulous editing and improvement of the [[Speechless (Michael Jackson song)|Speechless]] article and getting it all the way to Featured Article status from its humble beginnings. Great job! <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your meticulous editing and improvement of the [[Speechless (Michael Jackson song)|Speechless]] article and getting it all the way to Featured Article status from its humble beginnings. Great job! <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 20:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
14025 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14024 +++$+++ 14024 +++$+++ 2010-05-22 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.274585160E09 +++$+++ Wow! Thank you very much, Silver seren. ''' +++$+++ :Wow! Thank you very much, Silver seren. '''[[User:Pyrrhus16|<font color="black">Pyrrhus</font>]]'''[[User talk:Pyrrhus16|<font color="#FF0000">16</font>]]''' 20:26, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

14026 +++$+++ Moxy +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14026 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-24 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.274687640E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid Red;\" |<font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"><span style=\"color:white\">For your dedication to  everything that is MJ! You have set a wonderful example for everyone else to follow. I present you with this award on behalf of the community. Enjoy. ... +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid Red;" |<font face="Trebuchet MS"><span style="color:white">For your dedication to  everything that is MJ! You have set a wonderful example for everyone else to follow. I present you with this award on behalf of the community. Enjoy. ...[[User:Moxy|Moxy]] ([[User talk:Moxy|talk]]) 00:54, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
14027 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14026 +++$+++ 14026 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.274742300E09 +++$+++ Awesome. Thanks a lot, Moxy. ''' +++$+++ :Awesome. Thanks a lot, Moxy. '''[[User:Pyrrhus16|<font color="black">Pyrrhus</font>]]'''[[User talk:Pyrrhus16|<font color="#FF0000">16</font>]]''' 16:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

538315 +++$+++ Esurnir +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-16 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.179358320E09 +++$+++ If you remember where that picture was could you try to place the commons image in the article ? If you can't find it, is there any way to restore that picture :-S ? --  +++$+++ If you remember where that picture was could you try to place the commons image in the article ? If you can't find it, is there any way to restore that picture :-S ? -- [[User:Esurnir|Esurnir]] 16:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
538316 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538315 +++$+++ 538315 +++$+++ 2007-05-16 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.179358440E09 +++$+++ Fixed.\u2194 +++$+++ :Fixed.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 16:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

14028 +++$+++ Moxy +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14028 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-24 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.274745780E09 +++$+++ Was gong to make a 4th selection in the portal....Since you and Crystal Clear do all the articles ...pls tell me what '''YOU''' and Crystal Clear x3  would like to see in the portals next 5 spots...First an album article you guys got to GA..then a song from a GA article ...and so on!! ...no rush...but all upto you what is next!! :-) .... +++$+++ Was gong to make a 4th selection in the portal....Since you and Crystal Clear do all the articles ...pls tell me what '''YOU''' and Crystal Clear x3  would like to see in the portals next 5 spots...First an album article you guys got to GA..then a song from a GA article ...and so on!! ...no rush...but all upto you what is next!! :-) ....[[User:Moxy|Moxy]] ([[User talk:Moxy|talk]]) 17:03, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
14029 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14028 +++$+++ 14028 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.274746380E09 +++$+++ I'm not all that fussed what is chosen for the portal; they are all great articles deserving of being selected. You and Crystal Clear are probably the best ones to decide. Regards, ''' +++$+++ :I'm not all that fussed what is chosen for the portal; they are all great articles deserving of being selected. You and Crystal Clear are probably the best ones to decide. Regards, '''[[User:Pyrrhus16|<font color="black">Pyrrhus</font>]]'''[[User talk:Pyrrhus16|<font color="#FF0000">16</font>]]''' 17:13, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

538317 +++$+++ Real96 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538317 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-17 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.179443040E09 +++$+++ Per this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=University_of_Oklahoma&diff=prev&oldid=131520563 edit], OU has a hockey team, but it's not highly publicized on television.  However, since the link is official and is sponsored by the university, the fact should stay in the article. Reverting back shows [[WP:OWN|ownership]] and [[WP:AGF|a lack of good faith]]. '''<font color=\"#5B92E5\" face=\"georgia\"> +++$+++ Per this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Oklahoma&diff=prev&oldid=131520563 edit], OU has a hockey team, but it's not highly publicized on television.  However, since the link is official and is sponsored by the university, the fact should stay in the article. Reverting back shows [[WP:OWN|ownership]] and [[WP:AGF|a lack of good faith]]. '''<font color="#5B92E5" face="georgia">[[User:Real96|Real96]]</font>''' 16:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
538318 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538317 +++$+++ 538317 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.179443160E09 +++$+++ I left a message on the OU talk page as you were leaving a message on my talk page.\u2194 +++$+++ :I left a message on the OU talk page as you were leaving a message on my talk page.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 16:06, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
538319 +++$+++ Real96 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538317 +++$+++ 538318 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.179445860E09 +++$+++ I found the site while surfing. I can understand why the point is not included due to [[WP:V|verification]]. Good luck with the FA. '''<font color=\"#5B92E5\" face=\"georgia\"> +++$+++ ::I found the site while surfing. I can understand why the point is not included due to [[WP:V|verification]]. Good luck with the FA. '''<font color="#5B92E5" face="georgia">[[User:Real96|Real96]]</font>''' 16:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

276175 +++$+++ Pinkadelica +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276175 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-01 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.199216820E09 +++$+++ I apologize for removing trivia, but the majority of what I removed was from articles about movies. A lot of that trivia is from IMDb which, from what I've been told, is an unreliable source. If you like, I can revert all the deletions I did.  +++$+++ I apologize for removing trivia, but the majority of what I removed was from articles about movies. A lot of that trivia is from IMDb which, from what I've been told, is an unreliable source. If you like, I can revert all the deletions I did. [[User:Pinkadelica|Pinkadelica]] ([[User talk:Pinkadelica|talk]]) 11:47, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
276176 +++$+++ Wikidemo +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276175 +++$+++ 276175 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.199248380E09 +++$+++ I have reviewed this editor's trivia deletions going back to December 1, 2007 and reverted the deletions (but kept the useful edits) as I considered appropriate - the issues is further discussed at [[Wikipedia talk:Trivia sections]].   +++$+++ :I have reviewed this editor's trivia deletions going back to December 1, 2007 and reverted the deletions (but kept the useful edits) as I considered appropriate - the issues is further discussed at [[Wikipedia talk:Trivia sections]].  [[User:Wikidemo|Wikidemo]] ([[User talk:Wikidemo|talk]]) 20:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

14032 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-14 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.276499940E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/charles-thomson\/one-of-the-most-shameful_b_610258.html A good read], possible worth using in the jackson trial article. \u2014  +++$+++ [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-thomson/one-of-the-most-shameful_b_610258.html A good read], possible worth using in the jackson trial article. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''R'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 00:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
14033 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14032 +++$+++ 14032 +++$+++ 2010-06-17 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.276833780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the link. It was a very interesting read and would be great in the trial article, though I have no current plans to go anywhere the page; MJ song articles alone have become hard enough to maintain from POV-pushers and nuisances, so I'd hate to begin working on that. :) ''' +++$+++ :Thanks for the link. It was a very interesting read and would be great in the trial article, though I have no current plans to go anywhere the page; MJ song articles alone have become hard enough to maintain from POV-pushers and nuisances, so I'd hate to begin working on that. :) '''[[User:Pyrrhus16|<font color="black">Pyrrhus</font>]]'''[[User talk:Pyrrhus16|<font color="#FF0000">16</font>]]''' 21:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

538321 +++$+++ Ragesoss +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-09 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.178706060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message.  I sent them cut-and-pasted versions of the email exchange; it was through Flickr, so that's best I could do.  Hopefully it is sufficient.-- +++$+++ Thanks for the message.  I sent them cut-and-pasted versions of the email exchange; it was through Flickr, so that's best I could do.  Hopefully it is sufficient.--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] 03:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
538322 +++$+++ Ragesoss +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538321 +++$+++ 538321 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.179196020E09 +++$+++ I sent the email to the permissions address, but I haven't heard back yet.  It shouldn't be an issue that holds up the FAC process, though.-- +++$+++ :I sent the email to the permissions address, but I haven't heard back yet.  It shouldn't be an issue that holds up the FAC process, though.--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] 19:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
538323 +++$+++ Ragesoss +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538321 +++$+++ 538322 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.179632700E09 +++$+++ I heard back from the permissions verification, and they said it was not acceptable because, while I made clear that I had asked for permission to use a the photo with GFDL or CC-BY-SA, the photographer had simply replied that it was ok to use it on Wikipedia (which I took as implicit permission to release under a free license).  So I sent the photographer another email to clarify, and he said that the GFDL or similar was further than he was willing to go.  I'm really disappointed, but so it goes.-- +++$+++ ::I heard back from the permissions verification, and they said it was not acceptable because, while I made clear that I had asked for permission to use a the photo with GFDL or CC-BY-SA, the photographer had simply replied that it was ok to use it on Wikipedia (which I took as implicit permission to release under a free license).  So I sent the photographer another email to clarify, and he said that the GFDL or similar was further than he was willing to go.  I'm really disappointed, but so it goes.--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] 20:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

14034 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-18 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.276911600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for putting up [[William Hanna]] for the main page. [[Joseph Barbera]]'s 100th is next Spring, March 2011. Could you make a note to nom it at the appropriate time? Thanks. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ Thanks for putting up [[William Hanna]] for the main page. [[Joseph Barbera]]'s 100th is next Spring, March 2011. Could you make a note to nom it at the appropriate time? Thanks. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 18:40, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
14035 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14034 +++$+++ 14034 +++$+++ 2010-06-19 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.276982460E09 +++$+++ No worries. And yes, I'll make a note to nominate Barbera for his 100th. Regards, ''' +++$+++ :No worries. And yes, I'll make a note to nominate Barbera for his 100th. Regards, '''[[User:Pyrrhus16|<font color="black">Pyrrhus</font>]]'''[[User talk:Pyrrhus16|<font color="#FF0000">16</font>]]''' 14:21, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

14036 +++$+++ Robtencer +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14036 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-22 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.279803900E09 +++$+++ I am also a member of wikiproject x factor and feel very strongly about the issues.-- +++$+++ I am also a member of wikiproject x factor and feel very strongly about the issues.--[[User:Robtencer|Robtencer]] ([[User talk:Robtencer|talk]]) 06:05, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
14037 +++$+++ Legolas2186 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14036 +++$+++ 14036 +++$+++ 2010-07-30 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.280518860E09 +++$+++ Lol. Sorry, couldn't help it. \u2014 <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :Lol. Sorry, couldn't help it. — <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 12:41, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
14038 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14036 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-26 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.282867980E09 +++$+++ You're edits were reverted because they introduced several errors. The track listing was moved to the first section of the article, when the consensus is for it to be near the bottom. The article should arranged chronologically; production aspects first, then information regarding the music and structuring of the song, then post production, reception and finally the track listing. The structuring of the article is based on many GAs and FAs. You also introduced grammatical\/MOS errors and reduced contextual information that enhanced readers' understanding of the topic. Please take each aspect you have an issue with to the talk page for discussion. ''' +++$+++ :::You're edits were reverted because they introduced several errors. The track listing was moved to the first section of the article, when the consensus is for it to be near the bottom. The article should arranged chronologically; production aspects first, then information regarding the music and structuring of the song, then post production, reception and finally the track listing. The structuring of the article is based on many GAs and FAs. You also introduced grammatical/MOS errors and reduced contextual information that enhanced readers' understanding of the topic. Please take each aspect you have an issue with to the talk page for discussion. '''[[User:Pyrrhus16|<font color="black">Pyrrhus</font>]]'''[[User talk:Pyrrhus16|<font color="#FF0000">16</font>]]''' 17:13, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

276182 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276182 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-11 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.202788020E09 +++$+++ Hello Warren, I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of ''reverting [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]'', and that you will not abuse it by reverting [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|good-faith]] edits or to [[Wikipedia:Edit war|revert-war]]. For information on rollback, see [[Wikipedia:New admin school\/Rollback]] and [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature]]. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck.  +++$+++ Hello Warren, I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of ''reverting [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]'', and that you will not abuse it by reverting [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|good-faith]] edits or to [[Wikipedia:Edit war|revert-war]]. For information on rollback, see [[Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback]] and [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature]]. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
276183 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276182 +++$+++ 276182 +++$+++ 2008-02-22 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.203729120E09 +++$+++ You're welcome, and don't worry about only using it occasionally. :) It's there for when you need it.  +++$+++ :You're welcome, and don't worry about only using it occasionally. :) It's there for when you need it. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

14041 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14041 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-28 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.285736340E09 +++$+++ [[Grace Sherwood]] just became an FA (bot hasn't run yet though). It is about an alleged witch. I was wondering if you would put it on [[Wikipedia:Today's_featured_article\/requests]] when you get a chance and ask for Oct 31. Tks. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ [[Grace Sherwood]] just became an FA (bot hasn't run yet though). It is about an alleged witch. I was wondering if you would put it on [[Wikipedia:Today's_featured_article/requests]] when you get a chance and ask for Oct 31. Tks. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 21:59, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
14042 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14041 +++$+++ 14041 +++$+++ 2010-09-28 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.285736880E09 +++$+++ I figure it should get 1 pt for date relevancy, 1 for underepresented topic (witchcraft), 1-2 for no similar topic on the MP recently<span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :I figure it should get 1 pt for date relevancy, 1 for underepresented topic (witchcraft), 1-2 for no similar topic on the MP recently<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 22:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
14043 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14041 +++$+++ 14042 +++$+++ 2010-10-11 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.286787540E09 +++$+++ I managed to get this on TFA requests, so you may want to look at: [[Wikipedia:Today's_featured_article\/requests]]. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::I managed to get this on TFA requests, so you may want to look at: [[Wikipedia:Today's_featured_article/requests]]. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 01:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

538331 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-06 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.181176140E09 +++$+++ A friendly reminder: [[Portal:College football]] needs June put in. I'd do it, but you're way better at it.  +++$+++ A friendly reminder: [[Portal:College football]] needs June put in. I'd do it, but you're way better at it. [[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 17:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
538332 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538331 +++$+++ 538331 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.181177700E09 +++$+++ Crap. Thanks for the reminder.\u2194 +++$+++ :Crap. Thanks for the reminder.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 17:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

14044 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-07 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.289184300E09 +++$+++ It's a pity they don't mention [http:\/\/local.upmystreet.com\/picture-of-two-ball-lonnen-id-1092808.html Two Ball Lonnen].  +++$+++ It's a pity they don't mention [http://local.upmystreet.com/picture-of-two-ball-lonnen-id-1092808.html Two Ball Lonnen]. [[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 18:45, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
14045 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ Pyrrhus16 +++$+++ 14044 +++$+++ 14044 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.289420340E09 +++$+++ Lol. Perhaps they will next time. :) ''' +++$+++ :Lol. Perhaps they will next time. :) '''[[User:Pyrrhus16|<font color="black">Pyrrhus</font>]]'''[[User talk:Pyrrhus16|<font color="#FF0000">16</font>]]''' 12:19, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

89722 +++$+++ Collectonian +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-11 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.210562640E09 +++$+++ You do not [[WP:OWN|own]] the [[List of Roger Corman films]], and I think its silly to refuse to include the films he produced. You haven't given any valid reason for continuing to block such additions, and from the article history I see you've been doing this for awhile. The list is not a list of films Roger Corman directed, it is a list of Roger Corman films period. Adding those he produced is certainly relevant and appropriate content for the list. If you don't want to have anything but films he directed, rename the list and give it a lead to limit it just to that. Otherwise, stop blocking valid content. I've also posted to the Film project to get some feedback on this, as I believe your attempts to limit this list are inappropriate and not in keeping with the project standards.  +++$+++ You do not [[WP:OWN|own]] the [[List of Roger Corman films]], and I think its silly to refuse to include the films he produced. You haven't given any valid reason for continuing to block such additions, and from the article history I see you've been doing this for awhile. The list is not a list of films Roger Corman directed, it is a list of Roger Corman films period. Adding those he produced is certainly relevant and appropriate content for the list. If you don't want to have anything but films he directed, rename the list and give it a lead to limit it just to that. Otherwise, stop blocking valid content. I've also posted to the Film project to get some feedback on this, as I believe your attempts to limit this list are inappropriate and not in keeping with the project standards. [[User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[User talk:Collectonian|talk]]) 20:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
89723 +++$+++ Collectonian +++$+++ Hal Raglan +++$+++ 89722 +++$+++ 89722 +++$+++ 2008-05-12 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.210589700E09 +++$+++ Per the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films#Lists of films]], consensus shows that the list should be renamed to [[Roger Corman filmography]] and that it should be expanded to include his entire filmography. Several options for reformatting the list have also been suggested. I myself am partial to the sortable table idea. Before doing the rename, I'd like to know you won't revert and that you will go with consensus and, if not aid in expanding it, at least stop blocking it?  +++$+++ :Per the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films#Lists of films]], consensus shows that the list should be renamed to [[Roger Corman filmography]] and that it should be expanded to include his entire filmography. Several options for reformatting the list have also been suggested. I myself am partial to the sortable table idea. Before doing the rename, I'd like to know you won't revert and that you will go with consensus and, if not aid in expanding it, at least stop blocking it? [[User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[User talk:Collectonian|talk]]) 03:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

538337 +++$+++ Salaskan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-05 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.183677360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your time. <b> +++$+++ Thanks for your time. <b>[[User:Salaskan|<span style="color:red">Sala</span>]][[User talk:Salaskan|<span style="color:gold">Skan</span>]]</b> 16:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
538338 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538337 +++$+++ 538337 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.183680180E09 +++$+++ You can use a different welcome template but you cannot use multiple welcome templates. This script cannot differentiate between a registered user or an IP user. If you want to add a parameter, you should be able to do it by adding it to the var welcome_msg. So you would have <tt>var welcome_msg = 'welcome-anon|Salaskan'<\/tt>. Hope I answered your questions.\u2194 +++$+++ :You can use a different welcome template but you cannot use multiple welcome templates. This script cannot differentiate between a registered user or an IP user. If you want to add a parameter, you should be able to do it by adding it to the var welcome_msg. So you would have <tt>var welcome_msg = 'welcome-anon|Salaskan'</tt>. Hope I answered your questions.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 17:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
538339 +++$+++ Salaskan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538337 +++$+++ 538338 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.183754280E09 +++$+++ Doesn't work, when I try \"welcome-anon|Salaskan\" I just get the welcomeh-template when I click the welcome button. <b> +++$+++ ::Doesn't work, when I try "welcome-anon|Salaskan" I just get the welcomeh-template when I click the welcome button. <b>[[User:Salaskan|<span style="color:red">Sala</span>]][[User talk:Salaskan|<span style="color:gold">Skan</span>]]</b> 13:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

14051 +++$+++ Sven Manguard +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14051 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.310202600E09 +++$+++ Hi there. A number of images at [[E.S. Richardson Elementary School]] were uploaded by you with the text \"I own the photo\". I'd like for you to clarify that. Are you the photographer of those photos themselves, or do you own a copy of a document where those photos were printed, or did you photograph a photograph? Thank you for your time.  +++$+++ Hi there. A number of images at [[E.S. Richardson Elementary School]] were uploaded by you with the text "I own the photo". I'd like for you to clarify that. Are you the photographer of those photos themselves, or do you own a copy of a document where those photos were printed, or did you photograph a photograph? Thank you for your time. [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 02:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
14052 +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14051 +++$+++ 14051 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.310204580E09 +++$+++ I own the photo from a elementary school booklet. The photographer, Stanley Quade, is deceased. I scanned the photos and uploaded them.  +++$+++ :I own the photo from a elementary school booklet. The photographer, Stanley Quade, is deceased. I scanned the photos and uploaded them. [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 02:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
14053 +++$+++ Sven Manguard +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14051 +++$+++ 14052 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310206680E09 +++$+++ Err... owning a copy of a photo does not mean you own the photo itself. Quade would have to be decased several decades before the work exited copyright, 70 to 100 years depending on the jurisdiction.  +++$+++ ::Err... owning a copy of a photo does not mean you own the photo itself. Quade would have to be decased several decades before the work exited copyright, 70 to 100 years depending on the jurisdiction. [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 03:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

276197 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276197 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.204768800E09 +++$+++ Hey bro. Seeing you after a long time. Been busy or something? -- +++$+++ Hey bro. Seeing you after a long time. Been busy or something? --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 18:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
276198 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276197 +++$+++ 276197 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.204771200E09 +++$+++ Me too. Can't wait to get my hands on them. :-P -- +++$+++ :Me too. Can't wait to get my hands on them. :-P --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 18:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

14054 +++$+++ Sven Manguard +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.310204220E09 +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Southwest Collection, Lubbock, TX IMG 0015.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion\/2011 July 9#File:Southwest Collection, Lubbock, TX IMG 0015.JPG|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw -->  +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Southwest Collection, Lubbock, TX IMG 0015.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 9#File:Southwest Collection, Lubbock, TX IMG 0015.JPG|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw --> [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 02:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
14055 +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14054 +++$+++ 14054 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.310204760E09 +++$+++ It is a poster in the front entrance to the Southwest Collection Library.  +++$+++ :It is a poster in the front entrance to the Southwest Collection Library. [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 02:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

14056 +++$+++ Sven Manguard +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.310204640E09 +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Howard K. Smith of Ferriday, LA IMG 1222.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:Howard K. Smith of Ferriday, LA IMG 1222.JPG|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files\/2011 July 9#File:Howard K. Smith of Ferriday, LA IMG 1222.JPG|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf -->  +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Howard K. Smith of Ferriday, LA IMG 1222.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:Howard K. Smith of Ferriday, LA IMG 1222.JPG|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 July 9#File:Howard K. Smith of Ferriday, LA IMG 1222.JPG|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 02:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
14057 +++$+++ Sven Manguard +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14056 +++$+++ 14056 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310206800E09 +++$+++ There are two dozen images at that discussion link, you really need to come over and help explain this. '''Please head over to [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files\/2011 July 9]] as soon as possible.''' Thank you,  +++$+++ *There are two dozen images at that discussion link, you really need to come over and help explain this. '''Please head over to [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 July 9]] as soon as possible.''' Thank you, [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 03:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

276201 +++$+++ Itpastorn +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-13 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.205474580E09 +++$+++ Maybe \"technology\" is not the best word. Feel free to find a better one. CSS is a declarative markup language, though. In my book that is a technology. One thing CSS cannot '''be''' is a \"draft\".-- +++$+++ Maybe "technology" is not the best word. Feel free to find a better one. CSS is a declarative markup language, though. In my book that is a technology. One thing CSS cannot '''be''' is a "draft".--[[User:Itpastorn|itpastorn]] ([[User talk:Itpastorn|talk]]) 23:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
276202 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276201 +++$+++ 276201 +++$+++ 2008-03-13 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.205477700E09 +++$+++ Use [[Talk:Acid3]]. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Use [[Talk:Acid3]]. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 23:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

14058 +++$+++ Sven Manguard +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14058 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.310204700E09 +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Ann B. Warner IMG 1211.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion\/2011 July 9#File:Ann B. Warner IMG 1211.JPG|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw -->  +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Ann B. Warner IMG 1211.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 9#File:Ann B. Warner IMG 1211.JPG|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw --> [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 02:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
14059 +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14058 +++$+++ 14058 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310204820E09 +++$+++ It is a picture of a photo at the Delta Music Museum in Ferriday, LA, taken three years ago.  +++$+++ :It is a picture of a photo at the Delta Music Museum in Ferriday, LA, taken three years ago. [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 02:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
14060 +++$+++ Infrogmation +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14058 +++$+++ 14059 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.310359260E09 +++$+++ So? What does that have to do with the copyright of the original photo and whether or not you are the actual creator and sole copyright holder?  If you didn't take the original photo, why on earth did you license it as your own work?    +++$+++ :: So? What does that have to do with the copyright of the original photo and whether or not you are the actual creator and sole copyright holder?  If you didn't take the original photo, why on earth did you license it as your own work?   [[User:Infrogmation|Infrogmation]] ([[User talk:Infrogmation|talk]]) 21:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

276203 +++$+++ Scarian +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-14 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.205524980E09 +++$+++ I'm glad to see you're participating in discussion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Office_Open_XML#.22Refusal.22_section.3F here] but I am obliged to warn you for removing the refuted section [intially] without discussion. As you know, edit warring gets no one anywhere. I have no opinion on the the actual content dispute but I would like to see the edit warring '''stop''' completely. Thanks for your time. If you have any queries please do not hesitate to contact me.  +++$+++ I'm glad to see you're participating in discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Office_Open_XML#.22Refusal.22_section.3F here] but I am obliged to warn you for removing the refuted section [intially] without discussion. As you know, edit warring gets no one anywhere. I have no opinion on the the actual content dispute but I would like to see the edit warring '''stop''' completely. Thanks for your time. If you have any queries please do not hesitate to contact me. [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scar</font><font color="black" face="tahoma">ian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Call me Pat</sup></font>]] 13:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
276204 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276203 +++$+++ 276203 +++$+++ 2008-03-15 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.205621940E09 +++$+++ Whatever. I posted a multi-paragraph explanation on the talk page at the time of the removal.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Whatever. I posted a multi-paragraph explanation on the talk page at the time of the removal.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 15:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

276205 +++$+++ Vikizh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-22 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.206184620E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Vikizh|Vikizh]] ([[User talk:Vikizh|talk]]) 04:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
276206 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276205 +++$+++ 276205 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.206184980E09 +++$+++ Use [[Template talk:Microsoft Windows family]]. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Use [[Template talk:Microsoft Windows family]]. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 04:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

14062 +++$+++ Infrogmation +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310360400E09 +++$+++ I am an admin both here on Wikipedia and on Wikimedia Commons.  If I can be of any assistance, please let me know.  Thanks for your attention,  +++$+++ I am an admin both here on Wikipedia and on Wikimedia Commons.  If I can be of any assistance, please let me know.  Thanks for your attention, [[User:Infrogmation|Infrogmation]] ([[User talk:Infrogmation|talk]]) 22:00, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
14063 +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14062 +++$+++ 14062 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.310361300E09 +++$+++ Yes, I wrote the comments under each photo Friday night. These were posted three years ago. +++$+++ :Yes, I wrote the comments under each photo Friday night. These were posted three years ago.[[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 22:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
14064 +++$+++ Infrogmation +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14062 +++$+++ 14063 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.310369100E09 +++$+++ Your comments on the photo pages don't really address the problem: they are still tagged as your original work with you as the sole copyright holder.  I suggest you reply on the deletion request page, and add your vote for deletion of any and all \"photos of someone else's photo\" listed there.  (Feel free to add a comment, eg \"oops, sorry I didn't understand about derivative photos back in 2008\", or whatever is the case.) If any of the images listed actually are your own original work (no photo taken by anyone else seen anywhere in what you photographed), note that they are exceptions and can be kept.  Hope this helps. Cheers,  +++$+++ :: Your comments on the photo pages don't really address the problem: they are still tagged as your original work with you as the sole copyright holder.  I suggest you reply on the deletion request page, and add your vote for deletion of any and all "photos of someone else's photo" listed there.  (Feel free to add a comment, eg "oops, sorry I didn't understand about derivative photos back in 2008", or whatever is the case.) If any of the images listed actually are your own original work (no photo taken by anyone else seen anywhere in what you photographed), note that they are exceptions and can be kept.  Hope this helps. Cheers, [[User:Infrogmation|Infrogmation]] ([[User talk:Infrogmation|talk]]) 00:25, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14065 +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14062 +++$+++ 14062 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.310375940E09 +++$+++ I went into each photo under edit and explained the situation. Three, Tommy Spinks, Bill Dodd, and W.E. Whetstone can be saved because they are from a university annual prior to 1978 and not under copyright. When I said \"I own the photo\" I meant it was in my yearbook that I had purchased. I did not understand about derivative photos then. I thought the RCA logo photo from the museum predates the 70-year cutoff on copyright.  +++$+++ :I went into each photo under edit and explained the situation. Three, Tommy Spinks, Bill Dodd, and W.E. Whetstone can be saved because they are from a university annual prior to 1978 and not under copyright. When I said "I own the photo" I meant it was in my yearbook that I had purchased. I did not understand about derivative photos then. I thought the RCA logo photo from the museum predates the 70-year cutoff on copyright. [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 02:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14066 +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14062 +++$+++ 14062 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310376240E09 +++$+++ Some of those should come under \"fair use\" too, but I don't recall which ones off hand.  +++$+++ :Some of those should come under "fair use" too, but I don't recall which ones off hand. [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 02:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

276207 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276207 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-23 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.206272700E09 +++$+++ Warren, saw your entry at MOSNUM talk, and that you're something of an expert in the field of computers. Are you aware of the as-yet unsuccessful pushes to have the date-autoformatting function disentangled from the blue-splash linking function at MediaWiki? I wonder whether you're able to contribute technically, since the debate, which appears to have languished ''again'', appears to have faltered on the technicalities. [https:\/\/bugzilla.wikimedia.org\/show_bug.cgi?id=4582] [[User:Tony1|<font color=\"darkgreen\">'''Tony'''<\/font >]] [[User_talk:Tony1|<font color=\"darkgreen\">(talk)<\/font >]] 04:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Please reply on my page.  +++$+++ Warren, saw your entry at MOSNUM talk, and that you're something of an expert in the field of computers. Are you aware of the as-yet unsuccessful pushes to have the date-autoformatting function disentangled from the blue-splash linking function at MediaWiki? I wonder whether you're able to contribute technically, since the debate, which appears to have languished ''again'', appears to have faltered on the technicalities. [https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4582] [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User_talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 04:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Please reply on my page. [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User_talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 04:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
276208 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276207 +++$+++ 276207 +++$+++ 2008-03-23 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.206273300E09 +++$+++ Hi Tony, thanks for the message.  I haven't been keeping up with technical advancements in Wikipedia lately, but I will look into it since this is an area that definitely interests me... I'd love to see a simple and sensible solution to preference-driven date-linking on Wikipedia that isn't frustrating to editors.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Hi Tony, thanks for the message.  I haven't been keeping up with technical advancements in Wikipedia lately, but I will look into it since this is an area that definitely interests me... I'd love to see a simple and sensible solution to preference-driven date-linking on Wikipedia that isn't frustrating to editors.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 04:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

538352 +++$+++ Upholder +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538352 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-27 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.185581880E09 +++$+++ Hello, I'm guessing that you disagree that College Marching bands fall within the scope of WikiProject College football's pagentry and tradtions? --  +++$+++ Hello, I'm guessing that you disagree that College Marching bands fall within the scope of WikiProject College football's pagentry and tradtions? -- [[User:Upholder|Upholder]] 17:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
538353 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538352 +++$+++ 538352 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.185582120E09 +++$+++ I do. I brought this up over at [[WT:CFB]] yesterday and nobody has disagreed. I was given the go-ahead to remove them. If you disagree, feel free to voice your opinion there.\u2194 +++$+++ :I do. I brought this up over at [[WT:CFB]] yesterday and nobody has disagreed. I was given the go-ahead to remove them. If you disagree, feel free to voice your opinion there.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 17:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
538354 +++$+++ Upholder +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538352 +++$+++ 538353 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.185582780E09 +++$+++ Ah.  I just didn't see the discussion when I looked for it the first time. --  +++$+++ ::Ah.  I just didn't see the discussion when I looked for it the first time. -- [[User:Upholder|Upholder]] 17:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

570323 +++$+++ David Levy +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570323 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-10 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.210411260E09 +++$+++ Hello, David!  I'm just wondering why we're using a different background shade for the license tags.  Is this to match the license tags used at the Commons?  If so, I think that it might be better for us to match the other imbox variants instead.  \u2014 +++$+++ Hello, David!  I'm just wondering why we're using a different background shade for the license tags.  Is this to match the license tags used at the Commons?  If so, I think that it might be better for us to match the other imbox variants instead.  —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 02:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
570324 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570323 +++$+++ 570323 +++$+++ 2008-05-10 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.210413000E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 02:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
570325 +++$+++ David Levy +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570323 +++$+++ 570324 +++$+++ 2008-05-10 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.210413900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the explanation!  Also, thanks for pointing out my error with the cmbox protection icon (which I just corrected).  \u2014 +++$+++ ::Thanks for the explanation!  Also, thanks for pointing out my error with the cmbox protection icon (which I just corrected).  —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 03:05, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

538357 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-01 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.186010040E09 +++$+++ I've got a template system going for displaying stats in a more standardized way. It's not very glamorous but it works. The problem I'd like your help with is the data rows don't have the table background color and are \"transparent\" just showing the blue color instead of the light gray as they should. Any ideas? The example is at: [[User talk:Mecu\/FBStats Start]]. Feel free to edit as needed and make any improvements as well or provide suggestions and other feedback. Thanks.  +++$+++ I've got a template system going for displaying stats in a more standardized way. It's not very glamorous but it works. The problem I'd like your help with is the data rows don't have the table background color and are "transparent" just showing the blue color instead of the light gray as they should. Any ideas? The example is at: [[User talk:Mecu/FBStats Start]]. Feel free to edit as needed and make any improvements as well or provide suggestions and other feedback. Thanks. [[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 16:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
538358 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538357 +++$+++ 538357 +++$+++ 2007-08-01 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.186010340E09 +++$+++ Actually, I don't think the problem is in the template, I saw another table with the same \"problem\" and it looks like someone changed the CSS for WP. I would still like your input and feedback.  +++$+++ :Actually, I don't think the problem is in the template, I saw another table with the same "problem" and it looks like someone changed the CSS for WP. I would still like your input and feedback. [[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 16:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
538359 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538357 +++$+++ 538358 +++$+++ 2007-08-01 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.186016100E09 +++$+++ I don't even see a problem. I compared your template to the normal table on [[2006 Oklahoma Sooners football team]] and they look the same.\u2194 +++$+++ ::I don't even see a problem. I compared your template to the normal table on [[2006 Oklahoma Sooners football team]] and they look the same.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 17:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

14070 +++$+++ Drilnoth +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.310533800E09 +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Welcome sign at Maid of the Mist IMG 1360.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:Welcome sign at Maid of the Mist IMG 1360.JPG|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files\/2011 July 12#File:Welcome sign at Maid of the Mist IMG 1360.JPG|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> \u2013 +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Welcome sign at Maid of the Mist IMG 1360.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:Welcome sign at Maid of the Mist IMG 1360.JPG|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 July 12#File:Welcome sign at Maid of the Mist IMG 1360.JPG|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]]) 22:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14071 +++$+++ Drilnoth +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14070 +++$+++ 14070 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.310533920E09 +++$+++ I'll be listing a number of additional files of yours there shortly. Consider this notification for all the nominations. \u2013 +++$+++ :I'll be listing a number of additional files of yours there shortly. Consider this notification for all the nominations. –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]]) 22:12, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

395561 +++$+++ Seattle Skier +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-01 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.301712960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for any guidance you can provide in resolving this potentially volatile and damaging situation in the the best way possible.  -- +++$+++ Thanks for any guidance you can provide in resolving this potentially volatile and damaging situation in the the best way possible.  --[[User:Seattle Skier|Seattle Skier]] <font size="-2">[[User talk:Seattle Skier|(talk)]]</font> 19:56, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
395562 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395561 +++$+++ 395561 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.301748540E09 +++$+++ I was not aware of the ''Wilpower volcano chain'' mess, not good. His ''don't remember'' reply on the Sherman mine incident struck me as rather lame - but let it slide as I was not aware of other problems. If you have evidence of other such problems then I'd say report them to get them cleaned up. Regarding his rather hostile attitude toward any criticism, which I have been aware of in the past - simply ignore and proceed on with cleanup. I'm short on time this weekend - may check further later.  +++$+++ :I was not aware of the ''Wilpower volcano chain'' mess, not good. His ''don't remember'' reply on the Sherman mine incident struck me as rather lame - but let it slide as I was not aware of other problems. If you have evidence of other such problems then I'd say report them to get them cleaned up. Regarding his rather hostile attitude toward any criticism, which I have been aware of in the past - simply ignore and proceed on with cleanup. I'm short on time this weekend - may check further later. [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] ([[User talk:Vsmith#top|talk]]) 05:49, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
395563 +++$+++ Volcanoguy +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395561 +++$+++ 395562 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.301750820E09 +++$+++ First of all, I opposed to open a [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations]] case because I thought I would end up getting banned like you said Seattle Skier, which I do not need. To me it seems like you are trying to pull another \"personal attack\" on my editing here. How was I supposed to know the \"Wilpower volcano chain\" was a hoax? Other than that, I am not aware of creating articles with \"hoax\" sources because for Canadian volcanoes I use the Natural Resources Canada website and geologic papers. In fact, it was stated in the \"Wilpower\" sources that the webpages were created by someone of University of Manitoba and that he had an experience in geology. And surely not every Wikipedian gives a f--- about Wikipedia - I am also not censored. There are many other users on Wikipedia that don't or haven't sourced articles well. Everyone makes mistakes. I was mostly a beginner on Wikipedia when I added the copyvios and did not know and understand why I couldn't copy and paste copyrighted material on Wikipedia. I also didn't even know Wikipedia well. Like give it a break. You, Seattle Skier, are making it sound like I am the main user on Wikipedia that has done such a thing. Do you have any idea how many people vandalize Wikipedia every day? That is a lot worse than what I have done by copying copyrighted material onto Wikipedia. Me having a personal dislike of and conflict with you is not only because you attacked me by stating \"he sounds like a well-meaning schoolkid\", but you also made me feel like an idiot, especially with the large number of users on Wikipedia that might have seen it. I actually don't really have any problems with [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NOR]] because I prefer to source my work and word it myself. ''' +++$+++ ::First of all, I opposed to open a [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations]] case because I thought I would end up getting banned like you said Seattle Skier, which I do not need. To me it seems like you are trying to pull another "personal attack" on my editing here. How was I supposed to know the "Wilpower volcano chain" was a hoax? Other than that, I am not aware of creating articles with "hoax" sources because for Canadian volcanoes I use the Natural Resources Canada website and geologic papers. In fact, it was stated in the "Wilpower" sources that the webpages were created by someone of University of Manitoba and that he had an experience in geology. And surely not every Wikipedian gives a f--- about Wikipedia - I am also not censored. There are many other users on Wikipedia that don't or haven't sourced articles well. Everyone makes mistakes. I was mostly a beginner on Wikipedia when I added the copyvios and did not know and understand why I couldn't copy and paste copyrighted material on Wikipedia. I also didn't even know Wikipedia well. Like give it a break. You, Seattle Skier, are making it sound like I am the main user on Wikipedia that has done such a thing. Do you have any idea how many people vandalize Wikipedia every day? That is a lot worse than what I have done by copying copyrighted material onto Wikipedia. Me having a personal dislike of and conflict with you is not only because you attacked me by stating "he sounds like a well-meaning schoolkid", but you also made me feel like an idiot, especially with the large number of users on Wikipedia that might have seen it. I actually don't really have any problems with [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NOR]] because I prefer to source my work and word it myself. '''[[User:Volcanoguy|<font color="red">''Volcano''</font>]][[User talk:Volcanoguy|<font color="black">''guy''</font>]]''' 06:27, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
395564 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395561 +++$+++ 395563 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.301776020E09 +++$+++ We were all new users at one point and new users make mistakes. You appear to not understand the seriousness of [[WP:Copyvio]] - please carefully study that policy and work now to make sure any possible violations you may have made as a new user are corrected as I see you have done at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Heart_Peaks&action=historysubmit&diff=421941493&oldid=411295243 Heart Peaks]. Lashing out at someone who points out possible problems with your early edits is not productive. Refusing to comply with Wikipedia policies can result in serious problems for you - and [[WP:Ignore all rules]] does not trump other policies.  +++$+++ :::We were all new users at one point and new users make mistakes. You appear to not understand the seriousness of [[WP:Copyvio]] - please carefully study that policy and work now to make sure any possible violations you may have made as a new user are corrected as I see you have done at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heart_Peaks&action=historysubmit&diff=421941493&oldid=411295243 Heart Peaks]. Lashing out at someone who points out possible problems with your early edits is not productive. Refusing to comply with Wikipedia policies can result in serious problems for you - and [[WP:Ignore all rules]] does not trump other policies. [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] ([[User talk:Vsmith#top|talk]]) 13:27, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
395565 +++$+++ Volcanoguy +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395561 +++$+++ 395564 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.301787420E09 +++$+++ You can be against me too if you want Vsmith, but I am not going to tolerate it. I have read [[WP:Copyvio]] several times, but just seems like a bunch of opinionated stuff to me, even though I rather write stuff in my own words. It is also not productive to harass other users, as Seattle Skier has in the past or even in this discussion. I was not the one that started the harassment nonsense as I did not insult him until after I got insulted by him calling me a schoolkid. It also seemed like he was stalking me in my early days of editing Wikipedia. Being an administrator on Wikipedia does not make that user special. ''' +++$+++ ::::You can be against me too if you want Vsmith, but I am not going to tolerate it. I have read [[WP:Copyvio]] several times, but just seems like a bunch of opinionated stuff to me, even though I rather write stuff in my own words. It is also not productive to harass other users, as Seattle Skier has in the past or even in this discussion. I was not the one that started the harassment nonsense as I did not insult him until after I got insulted by him calling me a schoolkid. It also seemed like he was stalking me in my early days of editing Wikipedia. Being an administrator on Wikipedia does not make that user special. '''[[User:Volcanoguy|<font color="red">''Volcano''</font>]][[User talk:Volcanoguy|<font color="black">''guy''</font>]]''' 16:37, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
395566 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395561 +++$+++ 395565 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.301827560E09 +++$+++ Err... this is not about harassment or anyone being against you. It is about copyright violation - which you tacitly admit to with your recent removal of content from the Heart Peaks article. What you need to do now is to go through your other early contributions and either remove or repair and source any copyright violations that still remain.  +++$+++ :::::Err... this is not about harassment or anyone being against you. It is about copyright violation - which you tacitly admit to with your recent removal of content from the Heart Peaks article. What you need to do now is to go through your other early contributions and either remove or repair and source any copyright violations that still remain. [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] ([[User talk:Vsmith#top|talk]]) 03:46, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

14072 +++$+++ Drilnoth +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310533980E09 +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Lundy's Lane Museum sign IMG 1489.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:Lundy's Lane Museum sign IMG 1489.JPG|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files\/2011 July 12#File:Lundy's Lane Museum sign IMG 1489.JPG|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> \u2013 +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Lundy's Lane Museum sign IMG 1489.JPG]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files]] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:File:Lundy's Lane Museum sign IMG 1489.JPG|file description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 July 12#File:Lundy's Lane Museum sign IMG 1489.JPG|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]]) 22:13, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14073 +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14072 +++$+++ 14072 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312372440E09 +++$+++ I've never understood how a sign identifying a public building could be a copyright violation?  +++$+++ :I've never understood how a sign identifying a public building could be a copyright violation? [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 04:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

538361 +++$+++ Gopherguy +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-03 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.186182360E09 +++$+++ Hi - since you've done a lot of work on the NCAATeamSeason template, I was wondering if you could make another change to it.  Currently, the \"Prev year\" and \"Next year\" parameters are not used for football - these are simply calculated by subtracting and adding one to the \"Year\".  That is perfect as the default mode, but I'd like the ability to use those two parameters so that if they are not empty, the template would use the passed in values instead of doing the calculation.  For example, I'm working on a page about the early days of football at the University of Minnesota.  Their first season was 1882, so I'd like to be able to specify \"none\" for the previous year.  Then, they didn't have a team in 1884 or 1885, so for the 1883 season, I'd like to specify 1886 as the \"Next year\" and for 1886, I'd like to specify 1883 as the \"Prev year\".  Is this something you'd have the time to look at?  Thanks!   +++$+++ Hi - since you've done a lot of work on the NCAATeamSeason template, I was wondering if you could make another change to it.  Currently, the "Prev year" and "Next year" parameters are not used for football - these are simply calculated by subtracting and adding one to the "Year".  That is perfect as the default mode, but I'd like the ability to use those two parameters so that if they are not empty, the template would use the passed in values instead of doing the calculation.  For example, I'm working on a page about the early days of football at the University of Minnesota.  Their first season was 1882, so I'd like to be able to specify "none" for the previous year.  Then, they didn't have a team in 1884 or 1885, so for the 1883 season, I'd like to specify 1886 as the "Next year" and for 1886, I'd like to specify 1883 as the "Prev year".  Is this something you'd have the time to look at?  Thanks!  [[User:Gopherguy|Gopherguy]] 16:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
538362 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538361 +++$+++ 538361 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.186294920E09 +++$+++ Ok, I'll try to take a look at this this week.\u2194 +++$+++ :Ok, I'll try to take a look at this this week.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 23:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
538363 +++$+++ Gopherguy +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538361 +++$+++ 538362 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.186436040E09 +++$+++ OK - thanks again for your help!  +++$+++ ::OK - thanks again for your help! [[User:Gopherguy|Gopherguy]] 14:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
538364 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538361 +++$+++ 538363 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.186440600E09 +++$+++ I have made the requested changes. And, it appears, I implemented it the exact way you were wanting. The values you used in your infoboxes on your sandbox appear to be working as I expected. Let me know if there are further issues.\u2194 +++$+++ :::I have made the requested changes. And, it appears, I implemented it the exact way you were wanting. The values you used in your infoboxes on your sandbox appear to be working as I expected. Let me know if there are further issues.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 15:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
538365 +++$+++ Gopherguy +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538361 +++$+++ 538364 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.186441260E09 +++$+++ Yes, you're right - it is working.  Thanks a lot for making these changes!  My new page is pretty much ready for launch - I just need to write the introduction and then I can create the page.  +++$+++ ::::Yes, you're right - it is working.  Thanks a lot for making these changes!  My new page is pretty much ready for launch - I just need to write the introduction and then I can create the page. [[User:Gopherguy|Gopherguy]] 16:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

276219 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-13 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.208100240E09 +++$+++ As an unfortunate remnant of their separate geneses, the merged article now contains a weird mixture of prose and summary style writing. Lot of cleanup needed in this department and to ensure a good flow between the sections. I will let you finish whatever you have in mind before I start poking my butt in. :-P -- +++$+++ As an unfortunate remnant of their separate geneses, the merged article now contains a weird mixture of prose and summary style writing. Lot of cleanup needed in this department and to ensure a good flow between the sections. I will let you finish whatever you have in mind before I start poking my butt in. :-P --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 08:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
276220 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276219 +++$+++ 276219 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.208133060E09 +++$+++ A lot of the text you're quoting about the Pro section comes directly from the Windows XP article (and is part of the reason why that article lost its FA status recently)... I am of course very interested in getting this all refocused as prose where it's appropriate.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : A lot of the text you're quoting about the Pro section comes directly from the Windows XP article (and is part of the reason why that article lost its FA status recently)... I am of course very interested in getting this all refocused as prose where it's appropriate.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 17:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
276221 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276219 +++$+++ 276219 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.208100960E09 +++$+++ Hey, lets first finish the merge first. Copy-pasting into a monolithic article is just the first step. The tough part starts then after! Btw, it would be of great help if you point out whats lost in translation. -- +++$+++ :Hey, lets first finish the merge first. Copy-pasting into a monolithic article is just the first step. The tough part starts then after! Btw, it would be of great help if you point out whats lost in translation. --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 08:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
276222 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276219 +++$+++ 276219 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.208132640E09 +++$+++ Hey Xpclient, nice to hear from you -- yeah, I'm doing some copy editing to be a little more succinct with how some of the information is presented.  Probably the single biggest piece of text that didn't make it to the combined article is the section from the MCE article on hacking it do be able to join a domain.  It's still mentioned, but I moved the information into the \"features\" section, and retained the most important references.  I also tried to get the 64-bit editions a little more focused; there was a fair bit of overlap and duplication, so I was able to cut that down and present the whole 64-bit thing together.  It needs some more work, but I don't think it's too bad now.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Hey Xpclient, nice to hear from you -- yeah, I'm doing some copy editing to be a little more succinct with how some of the information is presented.  Probably the single biggest piece of text that didn't make it to the combined article is the section from the MCE article on hacking it do be able to join a domain.  It's still mentioned, but I moved the information into the "features" section, and retained the most important references.  I also tried to get the 64-bit editions a little more focused; there was a fair bit of overlap and duplication, so I was able to cut that down and present the whole 64-bit thing together.  It needs some more work, but I don't think it's too bad now.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 17:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

14077 +++$+++ Disavian +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.310774820E09 +++$+++ Hey, I see that the [[John K. Snyder]] article says that he went to Georgia Tech and left (presumably around 1947). Do you have a reference I could use to cite that? \u2014 +++$+++ Hey, I see that the [[John K. Snyder]] article says that he went to Georgia Tech and left (presumably around 1947). Do you have a reference I could use to cite that? —[[User:Disavian|Disavian]] ([[User talk:Disavian|<sup>talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Disavian|<sub>contribs</sub>]]) 17:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
14078 +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14077 +++$+++ 14077 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.310775120E09 +++$+++ This could be the source: \"Snyder Dies\", Alexandria Daily Town Talk, January 12, 1993.  +++$+++ :This could be the source: "Snyder Dies", Alexandria Daily Town Talk, January 12, 1993. [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 17:12, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

538366 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-04 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.186216140E09 +++$+++ Hello, thanks for the help with improving Template:University of Texas at Austin.  Very nice work!   +++$+++ Hello, thanks for the help with improving Template:University of Texas at Austin.  Very nice work!  [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 01:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
538367 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538366 +++$+++ 538366 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.186224180E09 +++$+++ No problem. Glad you like it. I'd like to get all University nav boxes to look the same to have some uniformity. Its a large undertaking though.\u2194 +++$+++ :No problem. Glad you like it. I'd like to get all University nav boxes to look the same to have some uniformity. Its a large undertaking though.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 03:43, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
538368 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538366 +++$+++ 538366 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.186269120E09 +++$+++ Thanks also for your comments at the 2007 UT football page.  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3A2007_Texas_Longhorn_football_team&diff=149163263&oldid=149010214 I replied there].  +++$+++ *Thanks also for your comments at the 2007 UT football page.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3A2007_Texas_Longhorn_football_team&diff=149163263&oldid=149010214 I replied there]. [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 16:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

276224 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-15 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.208305260E09 +++$+++ Does Windows Vista Embedded even exist? All I can find info on is [http:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/windows\/embedded\/eval\/vista\/default.mspx Windows Vista for Embedded Systems], which is the full Vista system licensed for embedded devices. Unlike the componentized XP Embedded (XPe), this thing is not componentized. According to [http:\/\/www.computerworld.com\/action\/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9077898 this], Windows Vista Embedded (lets call it Vistae as a successor to XPe) will probably be skipped in favor of 7e (as opposed to the version that is already available). Anyways, a major reorg is probably needed as [http:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/presspass\/press\/2008\/apr08\/04-15RoadMapEmbeddedPR.mspx Windows Embedded Standard, Windows Embedded Compact, Windows Embedded Enterprise and Windows Embedded POSReady] brands have been created to populate the Windows Embedded family. (According to the same document, an Windows XP for Embedded Devices edition exists separate from XPe; the former is now a part of Windows Embedded Enterprise while the latter of Windows Embedded Standard). Man, I am lost in this naming mess!!! -- +++$+++ Does Windows Vista Embedded even exist? All I can find info on is [http://www.microsoft.com/windows/embedded/eval/vista/default.mspx Windows Vista for Embedded Systems], which is the full Vista system licensed for embedded devices. Unlike the componentized XP Embedded (XPe), this thing is not componentized. According to [http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9077898 this], Windows Vista Embedded (lets call it Vistae as a successor to XPe) will probably be skipped in favor of 7e (as opposed to the version that is already available). Anyways, a major reorg is probably needed as [http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/apr08/04-15RoadMapEmbeddedPR.mspx Windows Embedded Standard, Windows Embedded Compact, Windows Embedded Enterprise and Windows Embedded POSReady] brands have been created to populate the Windows Embedded family. (According to the same document, an Windows XP for Embedded Devices edition exists separate from XPe; the former is now a part of Windows Embedded Enterprise while the latter of Windows Embedded Standard). Man, I am lost in this naming mess!!! --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 17:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
276225 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276224 +++$+++ 276224 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 05:50:00 +++$+++ 1.208350200E09 +++$+++ So how do we proceed? Make [[Windows Embedded]] article, and make [[Windows Embedded Compact]] (renamed from [[Windows Embedded CE]]), [[Windows Embedded Standard]] (containing NT4e, XPe and info about Vistae\/7e), [[Windows Embedded Enterprise]] (XP for Embedded, Vista for Embedded) and [[Windows Embedded PileOfShit]] (sorry POSReady :-P) sub articles of it? -- +++$+++ :So how do we proceed? Make [[Windows Embedded]] article, and make [[Windows Embedded Compact]] (renamed from [[Windows Embedded CE]]), [[Windows Embedded Standard]] (containing NT4e, XPe and info about Vistae/7e), [[Windows Embedded Enterprise]] (XP for Embedded, Vista for Embedded) and [[Windows Embedded PileOfShit]] (sorry POSReady :-P) sub articles of it? --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 05:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
276226 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276224 +++$+++ 276225 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.208354760E09 +++$+++ I am in favor of the [[Windows Embedded]] article being a glorified disambiguation page, in line with the [[SharePoint]] page, that describes (as opposed to just listing) the Windows Embedded family. I am going with this [http:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/presspass\/press\/2008\/apr08\/04-15RoadMapEmbeddedPR.mspx press release] on the family members. Also have moved [[Embedded Windows]] to [[Windows Embedded]]; am not touching other articles right now. -- +++$+++ ::I am in favor of the [[Windows Embedded]] article being a glorified disambiguation page, in line with the [[SharePoint]] page, that describes (as opposed to just listing) the Windows Embedded family. I am going with this [http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/apr08/04-15RoadMapEmbeddedPR.mspx press release] on the family members. Also have moved [[Embedded Windows]] to [[Windows Embedded]]; am not touching other articles right now. --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 07:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

614016 +++$+++ Tide rolls +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-13 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.260739440E09 +++$+++ Hey, Dave.  Thanks for taking time to respond to my question at AN\/I.  I'm posting here because I didn't think the noticeboard was the venue for this message.   As I suspected there is not much black and white to the issue.  I've left the IP's contribs alone even though I find the \"Glen X is a glen\" formula less informative than what it replaced.  It's just my POV and I don't believe my POV is any more important than the anon's.  I did want to let all the responders know that I found their input helpful.  Regards   +++$+++ Hey, Dave.  Thanks for taking time to respond to my question at AN/I.  I'm posting here because I didn't think the noticeboard was the venue for this message.   As I suspected there is not much black and white to the issue.  I've left the IP's contribs alone even though I find the "Glen X is a glen" formula less informative than what it replaced.  It's just my POV and I don't believe my POV is any more important than the anon's.  I did want to let all the responders know that I found their input helpful.  Regards  [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:darkRed">rolls'''</span>]] 13:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
614017 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614016 +++$+++ 614016 +++$+++ 2009-12-13 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.260769380E09 +++$+++ No problem, an interesting little issue. I've looked over the IP's edits, made a decision on each case, and noted that at ANI as well as adding a resolved template. We may se a nice new article about the Lost Valley appearing! . .  +++$+++ :No problem, an interesting little issue. I've looked over the IP's edits, made a decision on each case, and noted that at ANI as well as adding a resolved template. We may se a nice new article about the Lost Valley appearing! . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
614018 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614016 +++$+++ 614016 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.260855420E09 +++$+++ Thanks, sorry things have been rushed lately and haven't made progress on reviewing past situations. Will chip in in the next day or so. . .  +++$+++ :Thanks, sorry things have been rushed lately and haven't made progress on reviewing past situations. Will chip in in the next day or so. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
614019 +++$+++ SteveMcCluskey +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614016 +++$+++ 614018 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.260857940E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  If you'd like to sign on, at the moment the RfC lacks a second signature which it needs in 48 hours.  -- +++$+++ ::Thanks.  If you'd like to sign on, at the moment the RfC lacks a second signature which it needs in 48 hours.  --[[User:SteveMcCluskey|SteveMcCluskey]] ([[User talk:SteveMcCluskey|talk]]) 22:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
614020 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614016 +++$+++ 614019 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.260858900E09 +++$+++ My last efforts to get him to mend his ways seem to have been in August, but if no-one with more recent involvement signs up first I can presumably do so on that basis, so will look the details over and sign up tomorrow. Thanks,  +++$+++ :::My last efforts to get him to mend his ways seem to have been in August, but if no-one with more recent involvement signs up first I can presumably do so on that basis, so will look the details over and sign up tomorrow. Thanks, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

538370 +++$+++ Disavian +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-12 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.186903980E09 +++$+++ I reworked the article structure and content, mostly by sectioning the article and integrating the #Trivia section into the rest of the article. Care to have a look? I think it just needs references now... \u2014 +++$+++ I reworked the article structure and content, mostly by sectioning the article and integrating the #Trivia section into the rest of the article. Care to have a look? I think it just needs references now... —[[User:Disavian|Disavian]] ([[User talk:Disavian|<sup>talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Disavian|<sub>contribs</sub>]]) 00:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
538371 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538370 +++$+++ 538370 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.187037720E09 +++$+++ Look great! Most articles should do away with the Trivia section. Good job.\u2194 +++$+++ :Look great! Most articles should do away with the Trivia section. Good job.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 13:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

14083 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14083 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.311231780E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 00:03, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
14084 +++$+++  +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14083 +++$+++ 14083 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.311243720E09 +++$+++ You may want to see this: [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Daily_DYK_scandal]].--''' +++$+++ *You may want to see this: [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Daily_DYK_scandal]].--'''[[User:Milowent|Milowent]]''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">[[User talk:Milowent|talk]]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">[[Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue|blp-r]]</span></sup></small> 03:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
14085 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14083 +++$+++ 14084 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311244140E09 +++$+++ I hope you're now aware that we don't do this sort of thing on Wikipedia-- well, at least we're not supposed to-- I don't know how or why it got through DYK, but please take greater care in the future.   +++$+++ ** I hope you're now aware that we don't do this sort of thing on Wikipedia-- well, at least we're not supposed to-- I don't know how or why it got through DYK, but please take greater care in the future.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

276228 +++$+++ PuerExMachina +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-18 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.208507100E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you removed my deletion nomination for [[Windows Vista Embedded]] and told me to google it. I've done that, and I don't see anything that shows that Windows Vista Embedded exists. I think the authoritative references are Microsoft's [http:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/windows\/embedded\/products\/default.mspx Windows Embedded Products] page and this press release, [http:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/presspass\/press\/2008\/apr08\/04-15RoadMapEmbeddedPR.mspx Microsoft Charts Its Road Map for Windows Embedded Business]. I think the confusion arose because there is both Windows XP Embedded (a componentized version of XP Professional) and Windows XP for Embedded Systems (essentially full XP). People assumed Microsoft would release a componentized version of Vista and call it Windows Vista Embedded, but so far they have not. Instead they only released Windows Vista for Embedded Systems (essentially full Vista). To make this discussion more confusing, Microsoft just renamed both Windows XP for Embedded Systems and Windows Vista for Embedded Systems to Windows Embedded Enterprise. I mentioned all this on [[talk:Windows Vista Embedded]] when I made the edit. Once you've reviewed the two links to Microsoft above, could you please revert your edit?  +++$+++ I noticed that you removed my deletion nomination for [[Windows Vista Embedded]] and told me to google it. I've done that, and I don't see anything that shows that Windows Vista Embedded exists. I think the authoritative references are Microsoft's [http://www.microsoft.com/windows/embedded/products/default.mspx Windows Embedded Products] page and this press release, [http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/apr08/04-15RoadMapEmbeddedPR.mspx Microsoft Charts Its Road Map for Windows Embedded Business]. I think the confusion arose because there is both Windows XP Embedded (a componentized version of XP Professional) and Windows XP for Embedded Systems (essentially full XP). People assumed Microsoft would release a componentized version of Vista and call it Windows Vista Embedded, but so far they have not. Instead they only released Windows Vista for Embedded Systems (essentially full Vista). To make this discussion more confusing, Microsoft just renamed both Windows XP for Embedded Systems and Windows Vista for Embedded Systems to Windows Embedded Enterprise. I mentioned all this on [[talk:Windows Vista Embedded]] when I made the edit. Once you've reviewed the two links to Microsoft above, could you please revert your edit? [[User:PuerExMachina|PuerExMachina]] ([[User talk:PuerExMachina|talk]]) 01:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
276229 +++$+++ PuerExMachina +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276228 +++$+++ 276228 +++$+++ 2008-04-18 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.208508780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for working to straighten everything out!  +++$+++ : Thanks for working to straighten everything out! [[User:PuerExMachina|PuerExMachina]] ([[User talk:PuerExMachina|talk]]) 01:53, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

538373 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538373 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-17 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.187418420E09 +++$+++ I have nominated [[2005 Texas Longhorn football team]] as a [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/2005 Texas Longhorn football team|featured article candidate]].  All feedback is very welcome.  +++$+++ I have nominated [[2005 Texas Longhorn football team]] as a [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2005 Texas Longhorn football team|featured article candidate]].  All feedback is very welcome. [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 23:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
538374 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538373 +++$+++ 538373 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.187705640E09 +++$+++ Hello, I believe I have now combined all the short paragraphs so that there are no longer any short ones.  Please let me know if you spot other things I can fix.  Best,  +++$+++ *Hello, I believe I have now combined all the short paragraphs so that there are no longer any short ones.  Please let me know if you spot other things I can fix.  Best, [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 07:14, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

14087 +++$+++ Gatoclass +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311290640E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 16:24, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
14088 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14087 +++$+++ 14087 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.311291480E09 +++$+++ I see the problem continues-- some POV tags on these articles might be useful.   +++$+++ : I see the problem continues-- some POV tags on these articles might be useful.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
14089 +++$+++ Khazar +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14087 +++$+++ 14088 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.311419520E09 +++$+++ FWIW, I don't see the POV issues here at all. (Given that Sandy hasn't actually added a tag or made any changes to the article, I don't know that he\/she really does either.) But I do agree with Sandy more broadly that your articles, especially DYK noms, need work on including more reliable sourcing; you and I discussed this issue on a previous nom if I recall. I do hope you'll continue to contribute to expanding this area though, just with these concerns in mind. Thanks for your work, and cheers, --  +++$+++ :: FWIW, I don't see the POV issues here at all. (Given that Sandy hasn't actually added a tag or made any changes to the article, I don't know that he/she really does either.) But I do agree with Sandy more broadly that your articles, especially DYK noms, need work on including more reliable sourcing; you and I discussed this issue on a previous nom if I recall. I do hope you'll continue to contribute to expanding this area though, just with these concerns in mind. Thanks for your work, and cheers, -- [[User:Khazar|Khazar]] ([[User talk:Khazar|talk]]) 04:12, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

264492 +++$+++ Bob Castle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-19 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.208629800E09 +++$+++ Hello, I've just uploaded a title screenshot of ''[[Blackadder Goes Forth]]'', which in theory should be found here: [[:Image:Blackadder Goes Forth.jpg]], but I seem to have managed to mess it up somehow - it seems to be appearing as a blank file for some reason. Anyway, would it be possible for you to delete it and I can start over again, please? Thanks. ''' +++$+++ Hello, I've just uploaded a title screenshot of ''[[Blackadder Goes Forth]]'', which in theory should be found here: [[:Image:Blackadder Goes Forth.jpg]], but I seem to have managed to mess it up somehow - it seems to be appearing as a blank file for some reason. Anyway, would it be possible for you to delete it and I can start over again, please? Thanks. '''[[User:Bob Castle|Bob]]''' <small>'''[[User talk:Bob Castle|talk]]'''</small> 11:30, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
264493 +++$+++ Bob Castle +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264492 +++$+++ 264492 +++$+++ 2008-04-19 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.208640060E09 +++$+++ Ah right, that's weird - my computer does that occassionally with image galleries on here as well, so I guess that's the problem. I'll have to take your word it's there! Thanks for having a look. ''' +++$+++ :Ah right, that's weird - my computer does that occassionally with image galleries on here as well, so I guess that's the problem. I'll have to take your word it's there! Thanks for having a look. '''[[User:Bob Castle|Bob]]''' <small>'''[[User talk:Bob Castle|talk]]'''</small> 14:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

46039 +++$+++ 65.211.97.242 +++$+++ Mathewignash +++$+++ 46039 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-29 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.309386300E09 +++$+++ Glad to see that Mikaela breaking up with Sam is mentioned in the book.  Now if only people could stop insisting that Barricade and Bonecrusher are alive. --[[Special:Contributions\/65.211.97.242|65.211.97.242]] ( +++$+++ Glad to see that Mikaela breaking up with Sam is mentioned in the book.  Now if only people could stop insisting that Barricade and Bonecrusher are alive. --[[Special:Contributions/65.211.97.242|65.211.97.242]] ([[User talk:65.211.97.242|talk]]) 15:25, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
46040 +++$+++ Mabuska +++$+++ Mathewignash +++$+++ 46039 +++$+++ 46039 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.309386900E09 +++$+++ The break up is mentioned in the movie, even if they don't mention her name i think. Ah well thats what you get for calling Michael Bay a \"Nazi\" without taken into consideration that the executive director is Jewish. Quite insulting.  +++$+++ :The break up is mentioned in the movie, even if they don't mention her name i think. Ah well thats what you get for calling Michael Bay a "Nazi" without taken into consideration that the executive director is Jewish. Quite insulting. [[User:Mabuska|Mabuska]] <sup>[[User_talk:Mabuska|(talk)]]</sup> 15:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
46041 +++$+++ Mathewignash +++$+++ Mathewignash +++$+++ 46039 +++$+++ 46039 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.309388160E09 +++$+++ Barricade and Bonecrusher are alive in the toy line, and Barricade is alive in the comics and books. In the movies they are a bit ambiguous about it, could just be reused CG models in the fight scenes as generic Transformers.  +++$+++ :Barricade and Bonecrusher are alive in the toy line, and Barricade is alive in the comics and books. In the movies they are a bit ambiguous about it, could just be reused CG models in the fight scenes as generic Transformers. [[User:Mathewignash|Mathewignash]] ([[User talk:Mathewignash#top|talk]]) 15:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

276236 +++$+++ Linuxlad +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-21 08:44:00 +++$+++ 1.208792640E09 +++$+++ Since the aim is to import certain key Windows OS features (eg the syscall entry point) into the Linux Kernel, the better to run windows-OS softeware, I think the wundows-stub is clearly relevant. Will reinstate unless you can better justify. Bob aka  +++$+++ Since the aim is to import certain key Windows OS features (eg the syscall entry point) into the Linux Kernel, the better to run windows-OS softeware, I think the wundows-stub is clearly relevant. Will reinstate unless you can better justify. Bob aka [[User:Linuxlad|Linuxlad]] ([[User talk:Linuxlad|talk]]) 08:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
276237 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276236 +++$+++ 276236 +++$+++ 2008-04-21 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.208819460E09 +++$+++ {{tl|windows-stub}} is for articles about Microsoft Windows in and of itself, not for third-party programs.  In other words -- if it didn't ship with Windows, on the disc, this stub isn't suitable.  You should use {{tl|software-stub}} instead. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : {{tl|windows-stub}} is for articles about Microsoft Windows in and of itself, not for third-party programs.  In other words -- if it didn't ship with Windows, on the disc, this stub isn't suitable.  You should use {{tl|software-stub}} instead. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 16:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
276238 +++$+++ Linuxlad +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276236 +++$+++ 276237 +++$+++ 2008-04-21 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.208829300E09 +++$+++ But it isn't a third-party _program_ in that sense - everything from the kernel services up is standard windows or windows-compatible dlls.  +++$+++ ::But it isn't a third-party _program_ in that sense - everything from the kernel services up is standard windows or windows-compatible dlls. [[User:Linuxlad|Linuxlad]] ([[User talk:Linuxlad|talk]]) 18:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
276239 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276236 +++$+++ 276238 +++$+++ 2008-04-21 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.208835420E09 +++$+++ That doesn't matter.  It doesn't describe something that is part of Windows, in and of itself.  It describes a project that seeks to emulate Windows, which is not at all the same thing as being Windows.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::: That doesn't matter.  It doesn't describe something that is part of Windows, in and of itself.  It describes a project that seeks to emulate Windows, which is not at all the same thing as being Windows.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 20:37, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

538381 +++$+++ PeterSymonds +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-03 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.188873840E09 +++$+++ Hello, Nmajdan. I was wondering if you could help in the creation of a new [[Template:WPHERTS|template]] for the [[WP:HERTS|Hertfordshire Wikiproject]]. I've left a request on the Requests for Templates page, but the requests were mainly regarding info\/userboxes, and I was wondering if the request was the right place for them. I was looking at having the current template upgraded to something similar to WP:BIOG template, with the Stub-FA class rating, A-class review and low-top importance rating. If you could assist or suggest an alternative please let me know :) Many thanks for your consideration,  +++$+++ Hello, Nmajdan. I was wondering if you could help in the creation of a new [[Template:WPHERTS|template]] for the [[WP:HERTS|Hertfordshire Wikiproject]]. I've left a request on the Requests for Templates page, but the requests were mainly regarding info/userboxes, and I was wondering if the request was the right place for them. I was looking at having the current template upgraded to something similar to WP:BIOG template, with the Stub-FA class rating, A-class review and low-top importance rating. If you could assist or suggest an alternative please let me know :) Many thanks for your consideration, [[User:PeterSymonds|PeterSymonds]] 19:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
538382 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538381 +++$+++ 538381 +++$+++ 2007-09-05 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.189050120E09 +++$+++ I have commented.\u2194 +++$+++ :I have commented.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 20:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

14096 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14096 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.311414480E09 +++$+++ Every article of yours I have looked at is built on non-reliable sources and contains close paraphrasing, plagiarism, BLP violations, and non-reliable sources.  If these issues continue, and if DYK chooses to continue to feature these policy breaches on the mainpage, I will ask independent admins to look into your editing.   +++$+++ Every article of yours I have looked at is built on non-reliable sources and contains close paraphrasing, plagiarism, BLP violations, and non-reliable sources.  If these issues continue, and if DYK chooses to continue to feature these policy breaches on the mainpage, I will ask independent admins to look into your editing.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
14097 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14096 +++$+++ 14096 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311458460E09 +++$+++ Hey Billy, content contribution is like white water rafting a bit  -  too close to sources and we veer close to copyvio, too far and it's into OR or synthesis. I am thinking we just need to steer a bit further from wording at sources. I have done a bit here and there. If you have any questions on how something can be worded differently, just ask and I will try to come up with something. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hey Billy, content contribution is like white water rafting a bit  -  too close to sources and we veer close to copyvio, too far and it's into OR or synthesis. I am thinking we just need to steer a bit further from wording at sources. I have done a bit here and there. If you have any questions on how something can be worded differently, just ask and I will try to come up with something. Cheers, [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 15:01, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

276241 +++$+++ Socrates2008 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276241 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-24 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.209071700E09 +++$+++ Windows has always allowed a network UNC to mapped without a local drive letter being assigned.  At the console, this is \"Net use \\\\server\\share\" while in Explorer, you chose \"(none)\" as the drive letter.  The latter has been removed from Vista. <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva\"><font color=\"black\"><font size=\"4\">Socrates2008 (<font size=3> +++$+++ Windows has always allowed a network UNC to mapped without a local drive letter being assigned.  At the console, this is "Net use \\server\share" while in Explorer, you chose "(none)" as the drive letter.  The latter has been removed from Vista. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva"><font color="black"><font size="4">Socrates2008 (<font size=3>[[User talk:Socrates2008|Talk]]</font>)</font></font></font> 14:15, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
276242 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276241 +++$+++ 276241 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.209073320E09 +++$+++ Please use the article talk page for discussions related to the article from next time on. -- +++$+++ :Please use the article talk page for discussions related to the article from next time on. --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 14:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

14098 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.311433380E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 08:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
14099 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14098 +++$+++ 14098 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311456840E09 +++$+++ Plagiarism documented in the discussion at [[WT:DYK]].   +++$+++ : Plagiarism documented in the discussion at [[WT:DYK]].  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 14:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

276244 +++$+++ DavidPaulHamilton +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-24 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.209105480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for helping on [[Bondwell]] but it looks like the person has reverted you again. They have been warned but they blanked their talk page. +++$+++ Thanks for helping on [[Bondwell]] but it looks like the person has reverted you again. They have been warned but they blanked their talk page.[[User:DavidPaulHamilton|DavidPaulHamilton]] ([[User talk:DavidPaulHamilton|talk]]) 23:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
276245 +++$+++ 217.87.83.146 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276244 +++$+++ 276244 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.209106440E09 +++$+++ Warren, I'm not comitting vandalism. Fnagaton's edit was wrong. He even claimed my edit was vandalism. Just check the edit history. DavidPaulHamilton has no reason to interfere. He's likely a sock anyway or at the very least a disruptive single-purpose account acting as enforcement of the few people who are strongly opposing [[IEC 60027-2]]. --[[Special:Contributions\/217.87.83.146|217.87.83.146]] ( +++$+++ :Warren, I'm not comitting vandalism. Fnagaton's edit was wrong. He even claimed my edit was vandalism. Just check the edit history. DavidPaulHamilton has no reason to interfere. He's likely a sock anyway or at the very least a disruptive single-purpose account acting as enforcement of the few people who are strongly opposing [[IEC 60027-2]]. --[[Special:Contributions/217.87.83.146|217.87.83.146]] ([[User talk:217.87.83.146|talk]]) 23:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
276246 +++$+++ Fnagaton +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276244 +++$+++ 276245 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.209164640E09 +++$+++ This IP user has been [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&oldid=208128711#Range_block_request range blocked] for using multiple IPs to vandalise numerous pages. ''' +++$+++ ::This IP user has been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=208128711#Range_block_request range blocked] for using multiple IPs to vandalise numerous pages. '''[[User:Fnagaton|Fnag]][[User talk:Fnagaton|aton]]''' 16:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
276247 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276244 +++$+++ 276244 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.209125160E09 +++$+++ I've undone all your reversions.  A lot of thought and work went into this merge effort, and if you can't even be bothered to provide so much as an ''edit summary'' as an explanation for your reversions, much less a proper rationale, here or at [[Talk:Windows XP]], then I see no reason to treat your edits as anything other than disruptive.  [[Windows XP editions]] exists because these operating systems are 99.9% the same, and only vary slightly by hardware support and a couple of bundled applications.  The same rationale applies to [[Windows Vista editions]], and at some point we might have a [[Windows 2000 editions]] article, too.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : I've undone all your reversions.  A lot of thought and work went into this merge effort, and if you can't even be bothered to provide so much as an ''edit summary'' as an explanation for your reversions, much less a proper rationale, here or at [[Talk:Windows XP]], then I see no reason to treat your edits as anything other than disruptive.  [[Windows XP editions]] exists because these operating systems are 99.9% the same, and only vary slightly by hardware support and a couple of bundled applications.  The same rationale applies to [[Windows Vista editions]], and at some point we might have a [[Windows 2000 editions]] article, too.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 05:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

14101 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14101 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 10:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311614700E09 +++$+++ Calmhead mate with the DYKs. Its not a competition!! You've suddenly even passed Geschichte!\u2666  +++$+++ Calmhead mate with the DYKs. Its not a competition!! You've suddenly even passed Geschichte!♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 10:25, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
14102 +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14101 +++$+++ 14101 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311617100E09 +++$+++ What is the problem here? I wrote some articles on state legislators, all properly sourced and documented. I can't imagine someone spending his timne challenging these little artcles? No one except myself has ever found errors in any of my articles. None of the subjects to my knowledge has complained. It's not plagirism to rewrite someone else's words and given that person as the source. I won't be available for another ten days on Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :What is the problem here? I wrote some articles on state legislators, all properly sourced and documented. I can't imagine someone spending his timne challenging these little artcles? No one except myself has ever found errors in any of my articles. None of the subjects to my knowledge has complained. It's not plagirism to rewrite someone else's words and given that person as the source. I won't be available for another ten days on Wikipedia. [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 11:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

14103 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14103 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311552000E09 +++$+++ Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web -->  +++$+++ Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --> [[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 17:00, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
14104 +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14103 +++$+++ 14103 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311617280E09 +++$+++ Not a copyright violation. Material is paraphrased and properly sourced and documented from several sources.  +++$+++ :Not a copyright violation. Material is paraphrased and properly sourced and documented from several sources. [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 11:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

276248 +++$+++ Hervegirod +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-26 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.209266940E09 +++$+++ Hello, I think you may have been mistaken by [[User:hAl]] about my edits on the OOXML articles, he mention what he claims to be one of my edits: ''The fact remains that Office 2007 is not still conformant to the standard'', but as I checked my previous edits for the text \"The fact remains\" on the [[Office Open XML#Standardization|Standardization]] section [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Office_Open_XML&oldid=207717397 here], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Office_Open_XML&oldid=207468416 here], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Office_Open_XML&oldid=207220503 here], as far as of beginning of April, I could not find this  text. So either he invented it, or this sentence must have been somebody else add. And as for  +++$+++ Hello, I think you may have been mistaken by [[User:hAl]] about my edits on the OOXML articles, he mention what he claims to be one of my edits: ''The fact remains that Office 2007 is not still conformant to the standard'', but as I checked my previous edits for the text "The fact remains" on the [[Office Open XML#Standardization|Standardization]] section [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Office_Open_XML&oldid=207717397 here], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Office_Open_XML&oldid=207468416 here], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Office_Open_XML&oldid=207220503 here], as far as of beginning of April, I could not find this  text. So either he invented it, or this sentence must have been somebody else add. And as for [[User:hAl]], I still think that he looks biased to me, look [[User_talk:Hervegirod#ISO_document_version|Talk here]]. Also I find him writing about me as trolling is offending. And I'm sorry, but I don't find that the edit about [[Delegate (.NET)]] you pointed was POV. I founded this unsourced claim in the previous version of the article: ''Delegates are more efficient than interfaces as the method pointer is calculated (if virtual) when the delegate is first assigned, rather than each time it is invoked.'' and I searched for sources for or against it. I found an article from Microsoft's MSDN (the most recent benchmarks I could find about delegates at the time), and I don't think the tone was aggressive or NPOV. The performance information was later updated to the current text (and I participated to the update) after new benchmarks (which are few in the .NET world) were found. One last thing: One of my edits (later deleted because one user still thought there was too much ''sensationalism'' in it) was: ''However, Office conforms to the ECMA version of the standard, and it could be hinted that these differences are normal at this point in the history of the standard, because Microsoft could not have fixed them so early''. Still think I'm biased ? ([[User talk:Hervegirod|talk]]) 20:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
276249 +++$+++ Hervegirod +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276248 +++$+++ 276248 +++$+++ 2008-04-26 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.209276540E09 +++$+++ OK, as for ''the fact remains...'' stuff, I found it in the talk page. I looked for it in the article body. It strikes me that [[User:hAl]] choose to pick just this one sentence (I admit that the expression was flawed, but I have an excuse, I'm not a native English speaker) in [[Talk:Office_Open_XML#Conformance_with_ISO_spec.|this thread]]. I was merely explaining the reason why I undeleted  his previous deletion under the ''The fact that an implementation does not conform to a new not yet published format specification has no encyclopedic value'' claim.  +++$+++ : OK, as for ''the fact remains...'' stuff, I found it in the talk page. I looked for it in the article body. It strikes me that [[User:hAl]] choose to pick just this one sentence (I admit that the expression was flawed, but I have an excuse, I'm not a native English speaker) in [[Talk:Office_Open_XML#Conformance_with_ISO_spec.|this thread]]. I was merely explaining the reason why I undeleted  his previous deletion under the ''The fact that an implementation does not conform to a new not yet published format specification has no encyclopedic value'' claim. [[User:Hervegirod|Hervegirod]] ([[User talk:Hervegirod|talk]]) 23:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

14105 +++$+++ Cmadler +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 12:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311710160E09 +++$+++ Hello, Billy Hathorn.  This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations|Contributor copyright investigations]] concerning your contributions in relation to [[WP:C|Wikipedia's copyrights policy]]. The listing can be found [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations#Billy Hathorn|here]]. For some suggestions on responding, please see [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations#Responding_to_a_CCI_case|Responding to a CCI case]]. Thank you. <!--Template:CCI-notice-->  +++$+++ Hello, Billy Hathorn.  This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations|Contributor copyright investigations]] concerning your contributions in relation to [[WP:C|Wikipedia's copyrights policy]]. The listing can be found [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations#Billy Hathorn|here]]. For some suggestions on responding, please see [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations#Responding_to_a_CCI_case|Responding to a CCI case]]. Thank you. <!--Template:CCI-notice--> [[User:Cmadler|cmadler]] ([[User talk:Cmadler|talk]]) 12:56, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
14106 +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14105 +++$+++ 14105 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.312372140E09 +++$+++ I have committed no copyright violations; this is a red herring. The most recent violation alleged, Bill Noel, failed to be proved.  +++$+++ :I have committed no copyright violations; this is a red herring. The most recent violation alleged, Bill Noel, failed to be proved. [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 04:49, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14107 +++$+++ Sven Manguard +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14105 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.312383480E09 +++$+++ You ''cannot'' take photographs of other people's work and then upload those photographs as \"own work\". It's not just disingenuous, it's a violation of copyright, and Wikipedia cannot tolerate such behavior. You need to describe, in detail, where the image was taken, who created the original work, and what copyright status the original work has.  If you don't know the answer to any of those three questions, you shouldn't upload the image. If you do know the answer to each of those three questions, it needs to go into a [[:Template:Information]] template. If the copyright status of the origional work is more restrictive than you're release (i.e. if it's still copyrighted) then your photo has to be treated as fair use rather than free use, regardless of anything else. It dosen't matter if you took the photo, your act of taking the photo does not erase the copyright that was already there. I strongly recommend that you cease uploading photographs of other photographs\/books\/museum displays. The rest of your images are fine, you're only getting into trouble (in images) with this one subset of works.  +++$+++ :::You ''cannot'' take photographs of other people's work and then upload those photographs as "own work". It's not just disingenuous, it's a violation of copyright, and Wikipedia cannot tolerate such behavior. You need to describe, in detail, where the image was taken, who created the original work, and what copyright status the original work has.  If you don't know the answer to any of those three questions, you shouldn't upload the image. If you do know the answer to each of those three questions, it needs to go into a [[:Template:Information]] template. If the copyright status of the origional work is more restrictive than you're release (i.e. if it's still copyrighted) then your photo has to be treated as fair use rather than free use, regardless of anything else. It dosen't matter if you took the photo, your act of taking the photo does not erase the copyright that was already there. I strongly recommend that you cease uploading photographs of other photographs/books/museum displays. The rest of your images are fine, you're only getting into trouble (in images) with this one subset of works. [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 07:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14108 +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14105 +++$+++ 14105 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312403520E09 +++$+++ Those disputed images you mention (most three years ago) should in many cases fall under \"fair use.\" If not, what exactly is \"fair use\"?  +++$+++ :Those disputed images you mention (most three years ago) should in many cases fall under "fair use." If not, what exactly is "fair use"? [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 13:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

538398 +++$+++ PGPirate +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-17 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.192682820E09 +++$+++ Hello, I have seen your work with University of Texas at Austin, University of Oklahoma and Johnny Cash templates.  I molded the [[Template:East Carolina University]] after Texas.  But I can't get the show\/hide feature to work. Could you look at it and help me out? Thanks in advance, ''''' +++$+++ Hello, I have seen your work with University of Texas at Austin, University of Oklahoma and Johnny Cash templates.  I molded the [[Template:East Carolina University]] after Texas.  But I can't get the show/hide feature to work. Could you look at it and help me out? Thanks in advance, '''''[[User:PGPirate|<font color="purple">P</font><font color="gold">G</font>]][[User_Talk:PGPirate|<font color="black">Pirate</font>]]''''' 21:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
538399 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538398 +++$+++ 538398 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.192692180E09 +++$+++ Looks fine to me. Make sure you are adding the parameter to the template call in the article. See the change I made to [[The College of Human Ecology at East Carolina University]].\u2194 +++$+++ :Looks fine to me. Make sure you are adding the parameter to the template call in the article. See the change I made to [[The College of Human Ecology at East Carolina University]].↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 00:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
538400 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538398 +++$+++ 538398 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.192694340E09 +++$+++ On a side note, I am working on a base template similar to {{tl|navbox}} that will make the process of creating these easier. I'm still working out some kinks but I'm almost done. You can check it out at {{tl|Navigation with collapsible groups}} and I have implemented it on the {{tl|University of Oklahoma}} template. Check it out.\u2194 +++$+++ :On a side note, I am working on a base template similar to {{tl|navbox}} that will make the process of creating these easier. I'm still working out some kinks but I'm almost done. You can check it out at {{tl|Navigation with collapsible groups}} and I have implemented it on the {{tl|University of Oklahoma}} template. Check it out.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 00:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
538401 +++$+++ PGPirate +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538398 +++$+++ 538400 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.192707840E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  I just want to make it as user-friendly to go between the ECU articles as possible.  Once again, thanks ''''' +++$+++ ::Thank you.  I just want to make it as user-friendly to go between the ECU articles as possible.  Once again, thanks '''''[[User:PGPirate|<font color="purple">P</font><font color="gold">G</font>]][[User_Talk:PGPirate|<font color="black">Pirate</font>]]''''' 04:44, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

276255 +++$+++  +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276255 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ You are absolutely incorrect, and refuse to admit when you are wrong, and if you ever actually watched the original showing of MinWin you would realize that I am correct, and that MinWin is just an arbitrary name assigned to the standalone striped down version of the kernel that is just a proof of concept and WILL NEVER be a product or part of one, the actual kernel that will be in Windows 7 will be something that mirrors the efforts of \"MinWin\" on a much more realistic and practical scale. I will not continue this discussion with you as there is a repeated pattern of you refusing to admit when you are wrong, which you most certainly are. Especially refusing to acknowledge a reasonable request to both work on the section of the article that is being disputed until both parties agree as per Wikipedia guidelines. A. S. Castanza 04:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ You are absolutely incorrect, and refuse to admit when you are wrong, and if you ever actually watched the original showing of MinWin you would realize that I am correct, and that MinWin is just an arbitrary name assigned to the standalone striped down version of the kernel that is just a proof of concept and WILL NEVER be a product or part of one, the actual kernel that will be in Windows 7 will be something that mirrors the efforts of "MinWin" on a much more realistic and practical scale. I will not continue this discussion with you as there is a repeated pattern of you refusing to admit when you are wrong, which you most certainly are. Especially refusing to acknowledge a reasonable request to both work on the section of the article that is being disputed until both parties agree as per Wikipedia guidelines. A. S. Castanza 04:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
276256 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276255 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-29 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.212063960E09 +++$+++ You'd be better off if you just admit that you don't know what you're talking about, leave it alone.  Sorry, buddy, but when Windows kernel developers, and one of the Internet's most well-known reporters on all things Windows, and one of Wikipeida's most experienced editors on Windows subjects all align against what you believe to be true, you should just stop for a minute and ask yourself if you actually understand the topic.  There's no discussion to have -- you simply need to educate yourself.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :: You'd be better off if you just admit that you don't know what you're talking about, leave it alone.  Sorry, buddy, but when Windows kernel developers, and one of the Internet's most well-known reporters on all things Windows, and one of Wikipeida's most experienced editors on Windows subjects all align against what you believe to be true, you should just stop for a minute and ask yourself if you actually understand the topic.  There's no discussion to have -- you simply need to educate yourself.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 05:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
276257 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276255 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-29 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.212066360E09 +++$+++ Unsupported journalism?  What the fuck is your cognitive problem with this?  Why is your brain letting you down at a time when you need it to be functioning properly?  Why are you blithely arguing something that I provided you plenty of evidence to prove you wrong?  You [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AA._S._Castanza&diff=215666613&oldid=215665022 deleted my lengthy comment] on your talk page that provided you with multiple reliable sources, and you did not respond to any of it, but instead you choose to carry on with some stupid bullshit about \"unsupported journalism\".  You're saying that Mark Russinovich, Eric Traut and Paul Thurrott don't know what they're talking about, but when Ina Fried asks Steve Sinofsky a question that he very explicitly ''refuses to answer'', that is somehow acceptable?  Nothing that's been said in the last couple of days by Microsoft has refuted anything about Minwin's use in Windows 7.  You're going to have a miserable time editing Wikipedia if you can't see what's right in front of you.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ :: Unsupported journalism?  What the fuck is your cognitive problem with this?  Why is your brain letting you down at a time when you need it to be functioning properly?  Why are you blithely arguing something that I provided you plenty of evidence to prove you wrong?  You [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AA._S._Castanza&diff=215666613&oldid=215665022 deleted my lengthy comment] on your talk page that provided you with multiple reliable sources, and you did not respond to any of it, but instead you choose to carry on with some stupid bullshit about "unsupported journalism".  You're saying that Mark Russinovich, Eric Traut and Paul Thurrott don't know what they're talking about, but when Ina Fried asks Steve Sinofsky a question that he very explicitly ''refuses to answer'', that is somehow acceptable?  Nothing that's been said in the last couple of days by Microsoft has refuted anything about Minwin's use in Windows 7.  You're going to have a miserable time editing Wikipedia if you can't see what's right in front of you.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 06:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
276258 +++$+++  +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276255 +++$+++ 276255 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I looked at your sources and guess what, What Eric said is that \"[MinWin] is a set of components that they had taken out of Windows 7\". All this is, the incorrect assumption of a few journalists that they were building Windows 7 off of this, in reality its the other way around, they took early work on Windows 7, pulled these components out of it and isolated it. Thats all it is. A. S. Castanza 12:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :I looked at your sources and guess what, What Eric said is that "[MinWin] is a set of components that they had taken out of Windows 7". All this is, the incorrect assumption of a few journalists that they were building Windows 7 off of this, in reality its the other way around, they took early work on Windows 7, pulled these components out of it and isolated it. Thats all it is. A. S. Castanza 12:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
276259 +++$+++  +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276255 +++$+++ 276255 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ And again a quote: \"... Making sure we had a clear architectural layer there\" read it again for emphasis, thats all they are doing with MinWin \"And created what we call MinWin. This is internal only, we WONT be productizing this\" Therefore it WILL NOT be productized as Windows 7. Quote from the very end \"Thats kinda proof that there is a pretty nice little core inside Windows\" ie: its a proof of concept. Also he said at the very end again \"we don't have any productization plans for this, but we will be using this internally to build the other products biased off of windows... We build a lot of products biased off this kernel\" So as you can clearly see, Windows 7 is not biased of of MinWin, it is in fact the other way around. Hows that for proof. A. S. Castanza 13:13, 29 May 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ : And again a quote: "... Making sure we had a clear architectural layer there" read it again for emphasis, thats all they are doing with MinWin "And created what we call MinWin. This is internal only, we WONT be productizing this" Therefore it WILL NOT be productized as Windows 7. Quote from the very end "Thats kinda proof that there is a pretty nice little core inside Windows" ie: its a proof of concept. Also he said at the very end again "we don't have any productization plans for this, but we will be using this internally to build the other products biased off of windows... We build a lot of products biased off this kernel" So as you can clearly see, Windows 7 is not biased of of MinWin, it is in fact the other way around. Hows that for proof. A. S. Castanza 13:13, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
276260 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276255 +++$+++ 276259 +++$+++ 2008-05-29 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.212104580E09 +++$+++ ''\"Therefore it WILL NOT be productized as Windows 7\"'' - thats totally your interpretation. It could very well mean \"Therefore it WILL NOT be productized as a separate stand alone offering\". ''\"...,ie: its a proof of concept\"'' - no they were not proving any concept. They were debunking the myth that Windows is bloated. Don't take quotes out of context to prove a point. -- +++$+++ ::''"Therefore it WILL NOT be productized as Windows 7"'' - thats totally your interpretation. It could very well mean "Therefore it WILL NOT be productized as a separate stand alone offering". ''"...,ie: its a proof of concept"'' - no they were not proving any concept. They were debunking the myth that Windows is bloated. Don't take quotes out of context to prove a point. --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 16:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

14113 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312407900E09 +++$+++ Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web -->  +++$+++ Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --> [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 14:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14114 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Billy Hathorn +++$+++ 14113 +++$+++ 14113 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312410240E09 +++$+++ I now see that this copyvio dates to January 2011, and predates the current discussion; nonetheless, other issues are occurring in your editing, and I agree with HJMitchell's removal of your autopatrolled status, as you are still creating articles that aren't compliant with policy; in particular, you are still padding articles with irrelevant info, using non-reliable sources, paraphrasing too closely, and in one case I found, misrepresenting (or misunderstanding) a source.   +++$+++ * I now see that this copyvio dates to January 2011, and predates the current discussion; nonetheless, other issues are occurring in your editing, and I agree with HJMitchell's removal of your autopatrolled status, as you are still creating articles that aren't compliant with policy; in particular, you are still padding articles with irrelevant info, using non-reliable sources, paraphrasing too closely, and in one case I found, misrepresenting (or misunderstanding) a source.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:24, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

538402 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-18 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.192750020E09 +++$+++ What do you think?  +++$+++ What do you think? [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 16:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
538403 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538402 +++$+++ 538402 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.192754100E09 +++$+++ Since you are the Template King, do you see any advantage to making this into a template, or is a plain-old (sortable) Wikitable just as good for something like this?  +++$+++ :Since you are the Template King, do you see any advantage to making this into a template, or is a plain-old (sortable) Wikitable just as good for something like this? [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 17:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

538404 +++$+++ Okiefromokla +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-01 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.193903700E09 +++$+++ Hi there, I haven't seen you around lately. Have you been working outside of Wikiproject Oklahoma a little? I was wondering if you'd like to write a little blurb about Wikiproject University of Oklahoma for the Wikiproject Oklahoma newsletter if you've got some time in the next few days. It would be really helpful. Thanks! ''' +++$+++ Hi there, I haven't seen you around lately. Have you been working outside of Wikiproject Oklahoma a little? I was wondering if you'd like to write a little blurb about Wikiproject University of Oklahoma for the Wikiproject Oklahoma newsletter if you've got some time in the next few days. It would be really helpful. Thanks! '''[[User:Okiefromokla|Okiefromokla]]'''•[[User talk:Okiefromokla|talk]] 00:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
538405 +++$+++ Okiefromokla +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538404 +++$+++ 538404 +++$+++ 2007-11-01 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.193903880E09 +++$+++ On a side note, [[Oklahoma]] has been requested for today's featured article. Just thought you'd like to know. ''' +++$+++ :On a side note, [[Oklahoma]] has been requested for today's featured article. Just thought you'd like to know. '''[[User:Okiefromokla|Okiefromokla]]'''•[[User talk:Okiefromokla|talk]] 00:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

14118 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-28 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.306584900E09 +++$+++ I hope that makes sense. Cheers, <small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ I hope that makes sense. Cheers, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 05:15, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
14119 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14118 +++$+++ 14118 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.306585380E09 +++$+++ Replied, [[User_talk:Chzz#Yep]]. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ :Replied, [[User_talk:Chzz#Yep]]. <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 05:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

395569 +++$+++ Rusty Cashman +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395569 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-03 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.301825460E09 +++$+++ You semi-protected [[Alfred Russel Wallace]] because of an anonymous IP user who was editing against consensus. However the dispute on the talk page has seemed to calm down after a compromise edit was made. This article has traditionally not been semi-protected and I don't think there is any need for it to be semi-protected at this time. Thanks.  +++$+++ You semi-protected [[Alfred Russel Wallace]] because of an anonymous IP user who was editing against consensus. However the dispute on the talk page has seemed to calm down after a compromise edit was made. This article has traditionally not been semi-protected and I don't think there is any need for it to be semi-protected at this time. Thanks. [[User:Rusty Cashman|Rusty Cashman]] ([[User talk:Rusty Cashman|talk]]) 03:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
395570 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395569 +++$+++ 395569 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.301826000E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ :Done. [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] ([[User talk:Vsmith#top|talk]]) 03:20, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

538408 +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-27 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.196208900E09 +++$+++ I'm not a very good coder, but I'd be happy to help work on it with you if you think it's worth persuing. Let me know what you think.  +++$+++ I'm not a very good coder, but I'd be happy to help work on it with you if you think it's worth persuing. Let me know what you think. [[User:JKBrooks85|JKBrooks85]] ([[User talk:JKBrooks85|talk]]) 16:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
538409 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538408 +++$+++ 538408 +++$+++ 2007-11-27 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.196211600E09 +++$+++ Wow. I really like that. I've been working on a replacement as well but I like your design. In my spare time, I'll start working on coding that template. Edit: I'll be working on it in my userspace: [[User:Nmajdan\/Test]].\u2194 +++$+++ :Wow. I really like that. I've been working on a replacement as well but I like your design. In my spare time, I'll start working on coding that template. Edit: I'll be working on it in my userspace: [[User:Nmajdan/Test]].↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 17:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

14122 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-24 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.308970020E09 +++$+++ Hobit, I'm quite thankful to you for your statements about the recently created attack essay that was made about me. Your views regarding the inappropriate use of essay space as an attack on an editor, is most appreciated. &mdash; ''' +++$+++ Hobit, I'm quite thankful to you for your statements about the recently created attack essay that was made about me. Your views regarding the inappropriate use of essay space as an attack on an editor, is most appreciated. &mdash; '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 19:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14123 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14122 +++$+++ 14122 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.308971640E09 +++$+++ You are welcome Cirt, but honestly I wouldn't care _who_ was being attacked like this--even those I actually see serious fault with.  An essay isn't the place for commentary on a user.  If they feel that strongly, RfC\/U is the way to go (which I don't think is needed\/makes sense, but it's still the right forum).  +++$+++ *You are welcome Cirt, but honestly I wouldn't care _who_ was being attacked like this--even those I actually see serious fault with.  An essay isn't the place for commentary on a user.  If they feel that strongly, RfC/U is the way to go (which I don't think is needed/makes sense, but it's still the right forum). [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit#top|talk]]) 20:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14124 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14122 +++$+++ 14123 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.308972240E09 +++$+++ Hobit &mdash; What do you think of my statements regarding my future editing: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Cirt&diff=434240371&oldid=434237214  diff] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case&curid=22747298&diff=434373298&oldid=434361411 diff] ? &mdash; ''' +++$+++ **Hobit &mdash; What do you think of my statements regarding my future editing: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cirt&diff=434240371&oldid=434237214  diff] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&curid=22747298&diff=434373298&oldid=434361411 diff] ? &mdash; '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:24, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14125 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14122 +++$+++ 14124 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.308973500E09 +++$+++ Overkill IMO, but certainly should address the perceived issues.  +++$+++ ***Overkill IMO, but certainly should address the perceived issues. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit#top|talk]]) 20:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14126 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14122 +++$+++ 14125 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.308973620E09 +++$+++ Why overkill? I'd appreciate it if you could be more specific about how it will address the perceived issues? &mdash; ''' +++$+++ ****Why overkill? I'd appreciate it if you could be more specific about how it will address the perceived issues? &mdash; '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14127 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14122 +++$+++ 14126 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.308978660E09 +++$+++ I'd say just staying away from Scientology and Savage should be enough.  Certainly enough for me to feel the issue was over and done with. But then I don't see a serious problem with Savage (a bit with Scientology though, and that's as an old ARS semi-regular).  +++$+++ *****I'd say just staying away from Scientology and Savage should be enough.  Certainly enough for me to feel the issue was over and done with. But then I don't see a serious problem with Savage (a bit with Scientology though, and that's as an old ARS semi-regular). [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit#top|talk]]) 22:11, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14128 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14122 +++$+++ 14127 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.308978780E09 +++$+++ Well, by that reasoning it surely is a ''good'' thing for me to focus on other topics such as [[Supreme Court of the United States]] cases and the more general topic of [[Freedom of speech]], yes? &mdash; ''' +++$+++ ******Well, by that reasoning it surely is a ''good'' thing for me to focus on other topics such as [[Supreme Court of the United States]] cases and the more general topic of [[Freedom of speech]], yes? &mdash; '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 22:13, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14129 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14122 +++$+++ 14128 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.308978900E09 +++$+++ Yep, it's a good thing, but I'd certainly say you need not ''just'' focus on that area.  +++$+++ *******Yep, it's a good thing, but I'd certainly say you need not ''just'' focus on that area. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit#top|talk]]) 22:15, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14130 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14122 +++$+++ 14129 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.308979140E09 +++$+++ Ah, understood. Well, just wanted to emphasize as already noted in my above statements, my commitments to not edit DYK again in the future, and focus on those above topics in addition to my prior GA and FA quality improvement projects. Do you have any other advice related to how to address issues pertaining to recent controversy and actions about me? &mdash; ''' +++$+++ ********Ah, understood. Well, just wanted to emphasize as already noted in my above statements, my commitments to not edit DYK again in the future, and focus on those above topics in addition to my prior GA and FA quality improvement projects. Do you have any other advice related to how to address issues pertaining to recent controversy and actions about me? &mdash; '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 22:19, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14131 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14122 +++$+++ 14130 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308982920E09 +++$+++ Nope, just keep your head down for a bit.  I've always found you to be a fine editor. Best of luck!  +++$+++ *********Nope, just keep your head down for a bit.  I've always found you to be a fine editor. Best of luck! [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit#top|talk]]) 23:22, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

276270 +++$+++ Kevin Murray +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-10 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.213142760E09 +++$+++ Warren, I don't specifically object to nor do I support ATT.  I object to labeling something as being in a category which does not exist.  Essays are specifically described as the opinions of the writers, without alluding to the existence of a consensus.  I see this summary category as being a dangerous precedent, where without gaining a meaningful consensus, writers can subjectively condense a policy page or pages; then it becomes treated like gospel.  Condensing is editing and by definition something is lost.  If what is lost is not relevant to the consensus at the policy page, then it should not have been included there in the first place.  If our policies need to be summarized for them to be useful, then they are too complicated.  I'm involved at ATT today because I saw this being used as a precedent for using a similar template elsewhere.  With the best of intentions toward solving the exigencies at ATT, poor policy is being created.  -- +++$+++ Warren, I don't specifically object to nor do I support ATT.  I object to labeling something as being in a category which does not exist.  Essays are specifically described as the opinions of the writers, without alluding to the existence of a consensus.  I see this summary category as being a dangerous precedent, where without gaining a meaningful consensus, writers can subjectively condense a policy page or pages; then it becomes treated like gospel.  Condensing is editing and by definition something is lost.  If what is lost is not relevant to the consensus at the policy page, then it should not have been included there in the first place.  If our policies need to be summarized for them to be useful, then they are too complicated.  I'm involved at ATT today because I saw this being used as a precedent for using a similar template elsewhere.  With the best of intentions toward solving the exigencies at ATT, poor policy is being created.  --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] ([[User talk:Kevin Murray|talk]]) 17:06, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
276271 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276270 +++$+++ 276270 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.213152780E09 +++$+++ Please see my earlier comments on the talk page where I describe the ATT page as being similar to other pages we have in the Wikipedia namespace that ''describe'' policy without ''being'' policy.  I liken it to those booklets that governments hand out that teach you the rules of the road.  They don't give you a copy of the canonical traffic act; they give you a summation with pretty pictures and a less dense approach to the subject.  That's basically what the ATT page does -- it reformulates the official policy into something simpler, making it a useful learning reference, especially for newcomers. <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Please see my earlier comments on the talk page where I describe the ATT page as being similar to other pages we have in the Wikipedia namespace that ''describe'' policy without ''being'' policy.  I liken it to those booklets that governments hand out that teach you the rules of the road.  They don't give you a copy of the canonical traffic act; they give you a summation with pretty pictures and a less dense approach to the subject.  That's basically what the ATT page does -- it reformulates the official policy into something simpler, making it a useful learning reference, especially for newcomers. <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 19:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
276272 +++$+++ Kevin Murray +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276270 +++$+++ 276271 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.213155300E09 +++$+++ <s>ATT \"developed\" with more opposition than support, thus it has never represented consensus.<\/s>  The entities which summarize traffic rules represent an authority, ATT does not have the authority of consensus. Cheers!  -- +++$+++ :: <s>ATT "developed" with more opposition than support, thus it has never represented consensus.</s>  The entities which summarize traffic rules represent an authority, ATT does not have the authority of consensus. Cheers!  --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] ([[User talk:Kevin Murray|talk]]) 20:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
276273 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276270 +++$+++ 276272 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.213164840E09 +++$+++ You're also not really wrapping your head around what I meant by traffic booklets.  Consider a practical example: if you were dragged into court for a traffic violation, they aren't going to say, \"you broke the rule on page 62 of the booklet\"... they're going to tell you what section of the official, relevant traffic act you broke, and you will be prosecuted on that basis.  In Ontario, for example, that's the [[Highway Traffic Act (Ontario)|Highway Traffic Act]].  In the same vein, ATT is something you can read to learn about policies, and it is actually quite an accurate and reasonable way to look at the whole issue of information sourcing on Wikipedia.  But, you can't be blocked for \"ATT violations\", any more than can you be blocked for \"[[WP:5|five pillars]] violations\", or \"[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is an encyclopedia|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia]] violations\".  Those pages are not policies, guidelines, or essays, but I don't see people arguing that they should be considered \"historical\" or \"obsolete\" or should be tagged as \"essays\".  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ ::: You're also not really wrapping your head around what I meant by traffic booklets.  Consider a practical example: if you were dragged into court for a traffic violation, they aren't going to say, "you broke the rule on page 62 of the booklet"... they're going to tell you what section of the official, relevant traffic act you broke, and you will be prosecuted on that basis.  In Ontario, for example, that's the [[Highway Traffic Act (Ontario)|Highway Traffic Act]].  In the same vein, ATT is something you can read to learn about policies, and it is actually quite an accurate and reasonable way to look at the whole issue of information sourcing on Wikipedia.  But, you can't be blocked for "ATT violations", any more than can you be blocked for "[[WP:5|five pillars]] violations", or "[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is an encyclopedia|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia]] violations".  Those pages are not policies, guidelines, or essays, but I don't see people arguing that they should be considered "historical" or "obsolete" or should be tagged as "essays".  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 23:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
276274 +++$+++ Kevin Murray +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276270 +++$+++ 276273 +++$+++ 2008-06-11 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.213221180E09 +++$+++ Warren, I do see your point, but I would rather see our policy and guideline pages simplified than develop more layers of guidance.  It's a matter of clarity and practicality.  I have observed that the free-form nature of a wiki allows constant manipulation of the rule-sets with people changing one area without follow-through to all of the related pages and permutations.  Thus we end up with inconsistencies and the best of intentions backfire.  My main area of emphasis within the process pages has been at WP:N and the various subpages -- a horrific mess, which has improved in the last year, but is always in danger of exploding into hundreds of conflicting permutations.  -- +++$+++ :::: Warren, I do see your point, but I would rather see our policy and guideline pages simplified than develop more layers of guidance.  It's a matter of clarity and practicality.  I have observed that the free-form nature of a wiki allows constant manipulation of the rule-sets with people changing one area without follow-through to all of the related pages and permutations.  Thus we end up with inconsistencies and the best of intentions backfire.  My main area of emphasis within the process pages has been at WP:N and the various subpages -- a horrific mess, which has improved in the last year, but is always in danger of exploding into hundreds of conflicting permutations.  --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] ([[User talk:Kevin Murray|talk]]) 14:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

439261 +++$+++ Aceznates +++$+++ Android79 +++$+++ 439261 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-09 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.197200520E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Aceznates|Aceznates]] ([[User talk:Aceznates|talk]]) 03:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
439262 +++$+++ Android79 +++$+++ Android79 +++$+++ 439261 +++$+++ 439261 +++$+++ 2007-12-16 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.197863040E09 +++$+++ Spam can be deleted on sight. Provide some evidence of [[WP:BIO|notability]] for this person. Please don't use Wikipedia to promote yourself.  +++$+++ *Spam can be deleted on sight. Provide some evidence of [[WP:BIO|notability]] for this person. Please don't use Wikipedia to promote yourself. [[User:Android79|<span style="color:#072764">android</span>]][[User talk:Android79|<span style="color:#c6011f">79</span>]] 19:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
439263 +++$+++ Android79 +++$+++ Android79 +++$+++ 439261 +++$+++ 439261 +++$+++ 2007-12-16 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.197863160E09 +++$+++ Yup, that's why I deleted it. Looks like this issue has been resolved.  +++$+++ *Yup, that's why I deleted it. Looks like this issue has been resolved. [[User:Android79|<span style="color:#072764">android</span>]][[User talk:Android79|<span style="color:#c6011f">79</span>]] 19:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

538417 +++$+++ Storkk +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-21 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.198279620E09 +++$+++ Hi, i was wondering if you might take a look at a template and see if you could help fix it. I'm asking because I saw that you're both an admin (it's a protected template) as well as an expert template programmer. The template concerned is {{tl|Non-free use rationale}}, and the issue is that it  [[Template_talk:Non-free_use_rationale#Problem_with_exclamation_marks|chokes]] on certain filenames (e.g. [[:Image:!!! (album).jpg]]). I think the issue might have to do with escaping characters, but I don't know how to do that. Any help you could provide would be much appreciated! Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi, i was wondering if you might take a look at a template and see if you could help fix it. I'm asking because I saw that you're both an admin (it's a protected template) as well as an expert template programmer. The template concerned is {{tl|Non-free use rationale}}, and the issue is that it  [[Template_talk:Non-free_use_rationale#Problem_with_exclamation_marks|chokes]] on certain filenames (e.g. [[:Image:!!! (album).jpg]]). I think the issue might have to do with escaping characters, but I don't know how to do that. Any help you could provide would be much appreciated! Cheers, [[User:Storkk|Storkk]] ([[User talk:Storkk|talk]]) 15:27, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
538418 +++$+++ Storkk +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538417 +++$+++ 538417 +++$+++ 2007-12-21 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.198280820E09 +++$+++ More info: currently, <nowiki>{{<\/nowiki>PAGENAME}} has been replaced by <nowiki>{{<\/nowiki>PAGENAMEE}}, which has solved one problem, but <nowiki>[[{{{<\/nowiki>Article}}}]] is still causing it to choke. Cheers, -- +++$+++ :More info: currently, <nowiki>{{</nowiki>PAGENAME}} has been replaced by <nowiki>{{</nowiki>PAGENAMEE}}, which has solved one problem, but <nowiki>[[{{{</nowiki>Article}}}]] is still causing it to choke. Cheers, --[[User:Storkk|Storkk]] ([[User talk:Storkk|talk]]) 15:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
538419 +++$+++ Storkk +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538417 +++$+++ 538418 +++$+++ 2007-12-21 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.198281120E09 +++$+++ Quadell fixed it. Sorry to bother you. -- +++$+++ ::Quadell fixed it. Sorry to bother you. --[[User:Storkk|Storkk]] ([[User talk:Storkk|talk]]) 15:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

276276 +++$+++ Triwbe +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-10 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.213147440E09 +++$+++ I have reverted your redirect of [[Windows Vista 64]]. [[Windows Vista editions]] hardly mentions the 64-bit version and it has enough of it's own issues to warrant it's own article, or at least these issues should be merged first before redirect, and there are set procedures to discuss this. -- +++$+++ I have reverted your redirect of [[Windows Vista 64]]. [[Windows Vista editions]] hardly mentions the 64-bit version and it has enough of it's own issues to warrant it's own article, or at least these issues should be merged first before redirect, and there are set procedures to discuss this. --[[User:Triwbe|Triwbe]] ([[User talk:Triwbe|talk]]) 18:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
276277 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276276 +++$+++ 276276 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.213152900E09 +++$+++ Look at [[Windows XP editions]] and see how things are done there.  Information about 64-bit editions of Windows Vista belongs in [[Windows Vista editions]], not a separate article; there is very little information about 64-bit Vista that is sufficiently distinct from a general description of the editions that it requires its own article.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Look at [[Windows XP editions]] and see how things are done there.  Information about 64-bit editions of Windows Vista belongs in [[Windows Vista editions]], not a separate article; there is very little information about 64-bit Vista that is sufficiently distinct from a general description of the editions that it requires its own article.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 19:55, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

14133 +++$+++ EdJohnston +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14133 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-25 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.309038900E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&diff=prev&oldid=436146891 your comment at VPP], what do you mean about the different kinds of randomness? All articles should have an equal chance of being selected, so our random function (if working correctly) should give a uniform distribution across articles. Isn't [[IID]] a subtlety for when you don't know the distribution, but make the assumption that all trials come from the same one? Thanks,  +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&diff=prev&oldid=436146891 your comment at VPP], what do you mean about the different kinds of randomness? All articles should have an equal chance of being selected, so our random function (if working correctly) should give a uniform distribution across articles. Isn't [[IID]] a subtlety for when you don't know the distribution, but make the assumption that all trials come from the same one? Thanks, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 14:55, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14134 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14133 +++$+++ 14133 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.309050000E09 +++$+++ What I meant was that just because something was random doesn't mean there is a uniform distribution.  And yes, I should have used \"uniform distribution\" rather than IID, though I _think_ in this case they are equivalent.  As I mentioned I mess up the terms in class all the time...  +++$+++ *What I meant was that just because something was random doesn't mean there is a uniform distribution.  And yes, I should have used "uniform distribution" rather than IID, though I _think_ in this case they are equivalent.  As I mentioned I mess up the terms in class all the time... [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit#top|talk]]) 18:00, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

276278 +++$+++ Triwbe +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-10 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.213153380E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors{{#if:Windows Vista editions|, as you did on [[:Windows Vista editions]]}}. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa1 --> ''Please do not call other editors ideas stupid this is not acceptable wikpedia policy.''  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors{{#if:Windows Vista editions|, as you did on [[:Windows Vista editions]]}}. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa1 --> ''Please do not call other editors ideas stupid this is not acceptable wikpedia policy.'' [[User:Triwbe|Triwbe]] ([[User talk:Triwbe|talk]]) 20:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
276279 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276278 +++$+++ 276278 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.213153860E09 +++$+++ Please read [[WP:NPA]]; I said the ''idea'' of having two articles on Windows Vista editions is stupid... because it is... and according to policy, this is not a personal attack.  If you're offended, well, boo-hoo to you, but instead of taking the cheap way out and substing in a warning template onto my talk page, how about providing an explanation as to why Wikipedia requires two short articles on editions, rather than one longer one.  Thanks.  <span style=\"color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;\"> [[User talk:Warren|-\/-]]  +++$+++ : Please read [[WP:NPA]]; I said the ''idea'' of having two articles on Windows Vista editions is stupid... because it is... and according to policy, this is not a personal attack.  If you're offended, well, boo-hoo to you, but instead of taking the cheap way out and substing in a warning template onto my talk page, how about providing an explanation as to why Wikipedia requires two short articles on editions, rather than one longer one.  Thanks.  <span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User talk:Warren|-/-]] [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> 20:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

14136 +++$+++ 2.121.53.66 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14136 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.310002320E09 +++$+++ I don't like your username, it is extremely offensive to me. Would you consider changing it please? [[Special:Contributions\/2.121.53.66|2.121.53.66]] ( +++$+++ I don't like your username, it is extremely offensive to me. Would you consider changing it please? [[Special:Contributions/2.121.53.66|2.121.53.66]] ([[User talk:2.121.53.66|talk]]) 18:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
14137 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14136 +++$+++ 14136 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.310005260E09 +++$+++ Sorry, likely not.  I'd be interested in why you find it offensive though.  +++$+++ :Sorry, likely not.  I'd be interested in why you find it offensive though. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit#top|talk]]) 19:21, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
14138 +++$+++  Yaksar +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14136 +++$+++ 14137 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.310028300E09 +++$+++ Maybe he's a super passionate Lord of the Rings fan that doesn't even tolerate typos when they aren't even referring to Lord of the Rings?-- +++$+++ ::Maybe he's a super passionate Lord of the Rings fan that doesn't even tolerate typos when they aren't even referring to Lord of the Rings?--[[User: Yaksar|Yaksar]] [[User talk: Yaksar|(let's chat)]] 01:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
14139 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14136 +++$+++ 14138 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.310028600E09 +++$+++ Hey, it's not a typo, it's my username!  :-) Seriously, it's a name I've used on-and-off for years.  +++$+++ :::Hey, it's not a typo, it's my username!  :-) Seriously, it's a name I've used on-and-off for years. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit#top|talk]]) 01:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
14140 +++$+++ Nuujinn +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14136 +++$+++ 14139 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.310028840E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.urbandictionary.com\/define.php?term=hobit]?  [http:\/\/www.thefreedictionary.com\/Hobit]? [http:\/\/hobit.sourceforge.net\/]? <span style=\"text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD\">-- +++$+++ ::::[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hobit]?  [http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Hobit]? [http://hobit.sourceforge.net/]? <span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">--[[User:Nuujinn|Nuujinn]] ([[User_talk:Nuujinn|talk]])</span> 01:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

276282 +++$+++ Red Sunset +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276282 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-14 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.213455660E09 +++$+++ I know it wasn't the right place for my last \"tenditious\" addition as you will see from my edit summary, and would have been surprised had it not gone unchallenged or removed, but it was soooo bad that I just couldn't stop myself from slapping it in there! As long as we all remember not to take ourselves too seriously, it's a great page to let off some steam and unwind whilst light-heartedly (hopefully) winding others and the Wiki up; some of the entries are pure genius! Do you have any more definitions that you can add, or do you know of a similar page where my comment would not have been out of place? Cheers. -- +++$+++ I know it wasn't the right place for my last "tenditious" addition as you will see from my edit summary, and would have been surprised had it not gone unchallenged or removed, but it was soooo bad that I just couldn't stop myself from slapping it in there! As long as we all remember not to take ourselves too seriously, it's a great page to let off some steam and unwind whilst light-heartedly (hopefully) winding others and the Wiki up; some of the entries are pure genius! Do you have any more definitions that you can add, or do you know of a similar page where my comment would not have been out of place? Cheers. --[[User:Red Sunset|Red]] [[User talk:Red Sunset|<font style="color:#AA0000;">Su<font style="color:#DD0000;">ns<font style="color:#FF0000;">et</font></font></font>]] 08:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
276283 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276282 +++$+++ 276282 +++$+++ 2008-06-15 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.213591140E09 +++$+++ I wasn't sure if I should remove it or not, because it's not my Userspace... I think we could all write our own little dictionary of observations on phrases that we use and pointing out how silly or contradictory they are. :-)   Believe me, I agree with what your contribution said, but I believe that the more focused a list can be, the more enjoyable it will be for readers. <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : I wasn't sure if I should remove it or not, because it's not my Userspace... I think we could all write our own little dictionary of observations on phrases that we use and pointing out how silly or contradictory they are. :-)   Believe me, I agree with what your contribution said, but I believe that the more focused a list can be, the more enjoyable it will be for readers. <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 21:39, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

276285 +++$+++ Lester +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-19 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.213933860E09 +++$+++ Hi Warren. I ask that you delete the real name of the Wikipedia editor on your post at [[Talk:Office_Open_XML#Conflict_of_interest]]. Even though you were repeating what the previous editor has posted, he has now removed it from his post, so your post is the one that is revealing the identity of the other editor. If it could be removed quickly that would be appreciated. Thanks, --''' +++$+++ Hi Warren. I ask that you delete the real name of the Wikipedia editor on your post at [[Talk:Office_Open_XML#Conflict_of_interest]]. Even though you were repeating what the previous editor has posted, he has now removed it from his post, so your post is the one that is revealing the identity of the other editor. If it could be removed quickly that would be appreciated. Thanks, --'''[[User:Lester|<span style="color:green">Lester</span>]]''' 20:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
276286 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276285 +++$+++ 276285 +++$+++ 2008-06-19 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.213941060E09 +++$+++ Your request is noted, but this editor ''did'' self-create and upload a picture of himself onto the encyclopedia, into an article bearing his name, which he created.  He revealed his own identity on Wikipedia.  The fact that I've used this information isn't relevant to anything. If you have further issues with this, the [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest\/Noticeboard]] is a more suitable venue than my talk page. <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Your request is noted, but this editor ''did'' self-create and upload a picture of himself onto the encyclopedia, into an article bearing his name, which he created.  He revealed his own identity on Wikipedia.  The fact that I've used this information isn't relevant to anything. If you have further issues with this, the [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard]] is a more suitable venue than my talk page. <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 22:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
276287 +++$+++ Lester +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276285 +++$+++ 276286 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.213955580E09 +++$+++ Hi Warren, I'm asking again that you remove the user's name from your comment. There is a separation between a full Wikipedia article about a person, and that person's right to remain anonymous while making other contributions to Wikipedia. He doesn't edit under his real name, so it isn't relevant that there is a Wikipedia article about him. Please read [[Wikipedia:OUTING#Posting_of_personal_information]]. It would be deemed harassment, not CoI, and the place for that to be dealt with is the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard|ANi board]]. Please remove the person's real name.--''' +++$+++ ::Hi Warren, I'm asking again that you remove the user's name from your comment. There is a separation between a full Wikipedia article about a person, and that person's right to remain anonymous while making other contributions to Wikipedia. He doesn't edit under his real name, so it isn't relevant that there is a Wikipedia article about him. Please read [[Wikipedia:OUTING#Posting_of_personal_information]]. It would be deemed harassment, not CoI, and the place for that to be dealt with is the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard|ANi board]]. Please remove the person's real name.--'''[[User:Lester|<span style="color:green">Lester</span>]]''' 02:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
276288 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276285 +++$+++ 276287 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.213959720E09 +++$+++ I don't think it's a serious problem, given that [[User:Arnieswap]] created an article on himself, which is a clear [[WP:COI]] violation that wasn't discovered until I'd suggested it.  This is provable because \"Arnieswap\" is commonly known on the Internet as the nickname of the subject at hand.  If you think it's such a serious problem that it needs to be removed, then go ahead and change it yourself.  In the meantime, kindly sod off with the threats.  Thank you. <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ ::: I don't think it's a serious problem, given that [[User:Arnieswap]] created an article on himself, which is a clear [[WP:COI]] violation that wasn't discovered until I'd suggested it.  This is provable because "Arnieswap" is commonly known on the Internet as the nickname of the subject at hand.  If you think it's such a serious problem that it needs to be removed, then go ahead and change it yourself.  In the meantime, kindly sod off with the threats.  Thank you. <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 04:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
276289 +++$+++ Lester +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276285 +++$+++ 276288 +++$+++ 2008-06-25 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.214414940E09 +++$+++ I am sorry to learn that you refused to removed the editor's real life name from your post. I have named you at the [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Incidents#Editor.27s_identity_outed_at_Open_Office_XML|ANi board]] --''' +++$+++ ::::I am sorry to learn that you refused to removed the editor's real life name from your post. I have named you at the [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Editor.27s_identity_outed_at_Open_Office_XML|ANi board]] --'''[[User:Lester|<span style="color:green">Lester</span>]]''' 10:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
276290 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276285 +++$+++ 276289 +++$+++ 2008-07-06 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.215399000E09 +++$+++ That didn't go too well, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/IncidentArchive438#Editor.27s_identity_outed_at_Open_Office_XML did it]?  Hopefully in the future you'll trust that I understand what is a violation of Wikipedia's policies, and what isn't.  Thanks.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ :::::That didn't go too well, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive438#Editor.27s_identity_outed_at_Open_Office_XML did it]?  Hopefully in the future you'll trust that I understand what is a violation of Wikipedia's policies, and what isn't.  Thanks.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 19:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

14143 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14143 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.310526240E09 +++$+++ Humm, I came by to say I felt the discussion was pretty clearly a keep and if you are going to close some other way, it would be helpful to explain why in the closing.  I don't see how WP:BLP1E applies at this point as WP:N is (now, after improvements) pretty clearly met even ignoring the \"event\" in question. If you feel the discussion concluded otherwise, it would be helpful to know that and exactly why.  I don't think any of the remaining deletion !votes addressed the improvements to the article...  +++$+++ Humm, I came by to say I felt the discussion was pretty clearly a keep and if you are going to close some other way, it would be helpful to explain why in the closing.  I don't see how WP:BLP1E applies at this point as WP:N is (now, after improvements) pretty clearly met even ignoring the "event" in question. If you feel the discussion concluded otherwise, it would be helpful to know that and exactly why.  I don't think any of the remaining deletion !votes addressed the improvements to the article... [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 20:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14144 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14143 +++$+++ 14143 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.310526420E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, I'll type up a rationale and add it to the AFD within the next couple days. If you don't find it persuasive you are sincerely invited to take it up on [[WP:DRV]], of course. By the way, the previous comments on my talk page should not be construed as a closing rationale: I'd meant to make that clear in the same comment, but apparently my efforts failed. Regards,  +++$+++ :Fair enough, I'll type up a rationale and add it to the AFD within the next couple days. If you don't find it persuasive you are sincerely invited to take it up on [[WP:DRV]], of course. By the way, the previous comments on my talk page should not be construed as a closing rationale: I'd meant to make that clear in the same comment, but apparently my efforts failed. Regards, [[user:causa sui|causa sui]] ([[user talk:causa sui|talk]]) 20:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14145 +++$+++ Causa sui +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ 14143 +++$+++ 14144 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310603340E09 +++$+++ I've added a rationale. [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FBernard_Lewinsky&action=historysubmit&diff=439289744&oldid=439029550]  +++$+++ ::I've added a rationale. [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FBernard_Lewinsky&action=historysubmit&diff=439289744&oldid=439029550] [[user:causa sui|causa sui]] ([[user talk:causa sui|talk]]) 17:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

44116 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ 44116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310177580E09 +++$+++ Thanks!\u2666  +++$+++ Thanks!♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 19:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
44117 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ 44116 +++$+++ 44116 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.310179500E09 +++$+++ Your welcome.-- +++$+++ :Your welcome.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 19:45, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

538434 +++$+++ Hatmatbbat10 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-03 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.199366880E09 +++$+++ It worked thanks  +++$+++ It worked thanks [[User:Hatmatbbat10|Hatmatbbat10]] ([[User talk:Hatmatbbat10|talk]]) 05:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
538435 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538434 +++$+++ 538434 +++$+++ 2008-01-04 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.199511900E09 +++$+++ Looks good to me.\u2194 +++$+++ :Looks good to me.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 21:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

538437 +++$+++ Mandsford +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538437 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-07 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.199779020E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  I'll accomodate the form and at the template on any future article.  I appreciate that you moved the title without radically changing it.  \"1975 NCAA Division I football season\" doesn't have the same ring to it.  I've done some research on the Dickerson system rankings prior to the poll years, although these were only done at season's end.   Professor Dickerson's system had a simple foundation, but he added variables for different sections of the country as well.  Anyway, thanks for the additional pointers.  +++$+++ Thank you.  I'll accomodate the form and at the template on any future article.  I appreciate that you moved the title without radically changing it.  "1975 NCAA Division I football season" doesn't have the same ring to it.  I've done some research on the Dickerson system rankings prior to the poll years, although these were only done at season's end.   Professor Dickerson's system had a simple foundation, but he added variables for different sections of the country as well.  Anyway, thanks for the additional pointers. [[User:Mandsford|Mandsford]] ([[User talk:Mandsford|talk]]) 23:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
538438 +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538437 +++$+++ 538437 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.199842200E09 +++$+++ Shouldn't it be 1975 College football season instead of 1975 college football season?  +++$+++ :Shouldn't it be 1975 College football season instead of 1975 college football season? [[User:JKBrooks85|JKBrooks85]] ([[User talk:JKBrooks85|talk]]) 17:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
538439 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538437 +++$+++ 538438 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.199842620E09 +++$+++ I looked at [[WP:CAPS]] and it said the second word should be lowercase unless its a proper noun. college is the second word and its not proper. I looked at several style guideline pages and this was the conclusion I came up with. If we're looking for precedence, take a look at [[1st century]].\u2194 +++$+++ ::I looked at [[WP:CAPS]] and it said the second word should be lowercase unless its a proper noun. college is the second word and its not proper. I looked at several style guideline pages and this was the conclusion I came up with. If we're looking for precedence, take a look at [[1st century]].↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 17:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
538440 +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538437 +++$+++ 538439 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.199852040E09 +++$+++ Ah, okay. I was looking at \"College\" as being the first ''word'' in the title. Since you can't capitalize the year, I was looking at capitalizing College. To me, it just looks funny to be entirely in lower case, but if that's the style...  +++$+++ :::Ah, okay. I was looking at "College" as being the first ''word'' in the title. Since you can't capitalize the year, I was looking at capitalizing College. To me, it just looks funny to be entirely in lower case, but if that's the style... [[User:JKBrooks85|JKBrooks85]] ([[User talk:JKBrooks85|talk]]) 20:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
538441 +++$+++ JKBrooks85 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538437 +++$+++ 538440 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.199853840E09 +++$+++ I'll try and revert the changes I made yesterday. Hopefully I won't screw up things even more.  +++$+++ ::::I'll try and revert the changes I made yesterday. Hopefully I won't screw up things even more. [[User:JKBrooks85|JKBrooks85]] ([[User talk:JKBrooks85|talk]]) 20:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
538442 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538437 +++$+++ 538441 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.199853900E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I've opened a discussion on [[WT:CFB]] that may call for another name change. We'll see.\u2194 +++$+++ :::::Thanks. I've opened a discussion on [[WT:CFB]] that may call for another name change. We'll see.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 20:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

276294 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-18 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.216391760E09 +++$+++ I've restored my edit removing the reasons for Top Gear pre-emptions.  That kind of information adds nothing to the article except the length some editors are attempting to reduce.  Edit summary reflects as much this time; the first was an error. -- +++$+++ I've restored my edit removing the reasons for Top Gear pre-emptions.  That kind of information adds nothing to the article except the length some editors are attempting to reduce.  Edit summary reflects as much this time; the first was an error. --[[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 07:36, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
276295 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276294 +++$+++ 276294 +++$+++ 2008-07-18 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.216397340E09 +++$+++ I'm quite well aware of length considerations in articles... it's something I've been dealing with for two and a half years.  I've cut quite a bit out of the article myself.  In the case of this article, the length been because of an over-emphasis on certain details specific to single episodes, instead of describing the subject from a wider lens.  In the section about the show's broadcasts, it does make a lot of sense to explain that original broadcasts have often been pre-empted for other programming.  For the sake of not boring the reader, we don't need to list every example of this, but picking out an easily understood and immediately recognisable example makes for informative reading, and ties the subject back into the larger world around it.  The fact that Top Gear gets pre-empted for sports programming is also mentioned elsewhere in the article, and has specficially been criticised by its main presenter [http:\/\/www.topgear.com\/content\/features\/stories\/2006\/02\/stories\/01\/1.html here], on the show's web site.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : I'm quite well aware of length considerations in articles... it's something I've been dealing with for two and a half years.  I've cut quite a bit out of the article myself.  In the case of this article, the length been because of an over-emphasis on certain details specific to single episodes, instead of describing the subject from a wider lens.  In the section about the show's broadcasts, it does make a lot of sense to explain that original broadcasts have often been pre-empted for other programming.  For the sake of not boring the reader, we don't need to list every example of this, but picking out an easily understood and immediately recognisable example makes for informative reading, and ties the subject back into the larger world around it.  The fact that Top Gear gets pre-empted for sports programming is also mentioned elsewhere in the article, and has specficially been criticised by its main presenter [http://www.topgear.com/content/features/stories/2006/02/stories/01/1.html here], on the show's web site.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 09:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

276296 +++$+++ Halsteadk +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276296 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-19 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.216519740E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you have referenced a blog re the 21-year waiting list. The blog itself references a source for its content (Auto Trader) - you should reference the primary source as far as possible, so I have changed the reference to that. Furthermore, blogs are not generally considered verifiable sources as anyone can write any old garbage in a blog - please see [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you have referenced a blog re the 21-year waiting list. The blog itself references a source for its content (Auto Trader) - you should reference the primary source as far as possible, so I have changed the reference to that. Furthermore, blogs are not generally considered verifiable sources as anyone can write any old garbage in a blog - please see [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]. Thanks. [[User:Halsteadk|Halsteadk]] ([[User talk:Halsteadk|talk]]) 19:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
276297 +++$+++ 77.102.101.220 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276296 +++$+++ 276296 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.216623960E09 +++$+++ oops forgot my sig, thanks sinebot [[Special:Contributions\/77.102.101.220|77.102.101.220]] ( +++$+++ :oops forgot my sig, thanks sinebot [[Special:Contributions/77.102.101.220|77.102.101.220]] ([[User talk:77.102.101.220|talk]]) 00:06, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
276298 +++$+++ 77.102.101.220 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276296 +++$+++ 276297 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.216625460E09 +++$+++ Cheers dude. I'm all done now. All articles added in, tried to keep the new ones a little more terse. Generally accepted your edit decisions (thanks for locating the Grosser = xmas present article, for one) but have further tweaked a couple of things... e.g. your change to the 'manufacturers with all good looking cars' bit sent my mind down a different direction to original so i altered that a little. In any case, I'm giving up and going to bed now as I feel like crap. Not sure if I'll bother with it in future - I just noticed when coming to look up some detail (can't even remember what, now - probably what the circuit was) that it was like midnight and no-one had added it yet, which is unusual. Anyway, we won't be clashing now, so slash away. [[Special:Contributions\/77.102.101.220|77.102.101.220]] ( +++$+++ ::Cheers dude. I'm all done now. All articles added in, tried to keep the new ones a little more terse. Generally accepted your edit decisions (thanks for locating the Grosser = xmas present article, for one) but have further tweaked a couple of things... e.g. your change to the 'manufacturers with all good looking cars' bit sent my mind down a different direction to original so i altered that a little. In any case, I'm giving up and going to bed now as I feel like crap. Not sure if I'll bother with it in future - I just noticed when coming to look up some detail (can't even remember what, now - probably what the circuit was) that it was like midnight and no-one had added it yet, which is unusual. Anyway, we won't be clashing now, so slash away. [[Special:Contributions/77.102.101.220|77.102.101.220]] ([[User talk:77.102.101.220|talk]]) 00:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

276299 +++$+++ hAl +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276299 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-22 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.216767180E09 +++$+++ I know you reported [[user:Kilz]] before for sockpuppeteering resulting in most of his sockpuppets being closed and his account being blocked for a while for a second time. It seems this person is still around and messing with the [[Office Open XML]] related articles and of course again accusing me of bad behaviour. Enjoy the read on [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Dealing_with_bad_faith_by_User_hAl ]]  +++$+++ I know you reported [[user:Kilz]] before for sockpuppeteering resulting in most of his sockpuppets being closed and his account being blocked for a while for a second time. It seems this person is still around and messing with the [[Office Open XML]] related articles and of course again accusing me of bad behaviour. Enjoy the read on [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Dealing_with_bad_faith_by_User_hAl ]] [[User:HAl|hAl]] ([[User talk:HAl|talk]]) 15:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
276300 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276299 +++$+++ 276299 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.216795440E09 +++$+++ Hi, hAl... I don't remember being involved with Kilz's being reported for sockpuppet-related activities.  I had a look around and you might be confusing me with either [[User:Widefox]], who filed [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Kilz]] in 2006, or [[User:WalterGR]] who filed [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Kilz (2nd)]].  Lots of W names... :-)  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Hi, hAl... I don't remember being involved with Kilz's being reported for sockpuppet-related activities.  I had a look around and you might be confusing me with either [[User:Widefox]], who filed [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kilz]] in 2006, or [[User:WalterGR]] who filed [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kilz (2nd)]].  Lots of W names... :-)  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 23:44, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

276301 +++$+++ LicenseFee +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-23 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.216799940E09 +++$+++ I'm fine with the page being deleted, but I thought on Wikipedia there had to be a consensus and the page had to be nominated for deletion? I'm sorry if it seems like I'm reverting your edits malitiously, but I'm really just trying to obey the rules as I perceive them. If I'm wrong, please do point it out. (Oh, and could you reply on my talk page so I know you've replied? I'm not often on here - cheers.)  +++$+++ I'm fine with the page being deleted, but I thought on Wikipedia there had to be a consensus and the page had to be nominated for deletion? I'm sorry if it seems like I'm reverting your edits malitiously, but I'm really just trying to obey the rules as I perceive them. If I'm wrong, please do point it out. (Oh, and could you reply on my talk page so I know you've replied? I'm not often on here - cheers.) [[User:LicenseFee|LicenseFee]] ([[User talk:LicenseFee|talk]]) 00:59, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
276302 +++$+++ LicenseFee +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276301 +++$+++ 276301 +++$+++ 2008-07-23 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.216830780E09 +++$+++ Okay! That's fine then. Sorry, I was just making sure. Me and my anal retentiveness. By all means, clear the page. Although (if you don't know already) there's a small dispute going on in the talk page, so I'd be careful incase you get pulled into that :\/. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Okay! That's fine then. Sorry, I was just making sure. Me and my anal retentiveness. By all means, clear the page. Although (if you don't know already) there's a small dispute going on in the talk page, so I'd be careful incase you get pulled into that :/. Cheers. [[User:LicenseFee|LicenseFee]] ([[User talk:LicenseFee|talk]]) 09:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
276303 +++$+++ LicenseFee +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276301 +++$+++ 276302 +++$+++ 2008-07-23 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.216879860E09 +++$+++ Hmm. Seems like they backed themselves into a corner there. They only featured him twice - the audience were hardly going to have the time to warm up to the lad. And that does give more strength to the non-notible claim... at least, if they don't feature him on the last episode.  +++$+++ ::Hmm. Seems like they backed themselves into a corner there. They only featured him twice - the audience were hardly going to have the time to warm up to the lad. And that does give more strength to the non-notible claim... at least, if they don't feature him on the last episode. [[User:LicenseFee|LicenseFee]] ([[User talk:LicenseFee|talk]]) 23:11, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

538446 +++$+++ UnclePaco +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-09 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.199931180E09 +++$+++ As per your comment here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:St._John%27s_University_%28New_York_City%29#Unprotect].  The page is currently back on full protection until Jan 13.  I'm requesting a month long full protection.  After you unprotected, it went back to edit warring.   +++$+++ As per your comment here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:St._John%27s_University_%28New_York_City%29#Unprotect].  The page is currently back on full protection until Jan 13.  I'm requesting a month long full protection.  After you unprotected, it went back to edit warring.  [[User:UnclePaco|UnclePaco]] ([[User talk:UnclePaco|talk]]) 18:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
538447 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538446 +++$+++ 538446 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.199931600E09 +++$+++ That's perfectly fine. I was never against the protection. I was going through pages on [[Special:Protectedpages]] looking for pages that did not have an end date and had been protected for a long time. This article was protected for five months. After looking at the edit history and the talk page, I didn't see any reason for it to be blocked. If the vandalism\/edit warring resumed, by all means, protect it. I'm glad that it will only be protected for finite amount of time. I'm really against fully protecting articles for an indefinite period of time except in extreme cases. Thank you for letting me know.\u2194 +++$+++ :That's perfectly fine. I was never against the protection. I was going through pages on [[Special:Protectedpages]] looking for pages that did not have an end date and had been protected for a long time. This article was protected for five months. After looking at the edit history and the talk page, I didn't see any reason for it to be blocked. If the vandalism/edit warring resumed, by all means, protect it. I'm glad that it will only be protected for finite amount of time. I'm really against fully protecting articles for an indefinite period of time except in extreme cases. Thank you for letting me know.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 18:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
538448 +++$+++ UnclePaco +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538446 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.199985480E09 +++$+++ well I was also asking  you if could reprotect (fully) the article for at least a 2 month period.  thanks  +++$+++ :::well I was also asking  you if could reprotect (fully) the article for at least a 2 month period.  thanks [[User:UnclePaco|UnclePaco]] ([[User talk:UnclePaco|talk]]) 09:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
538449 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538446 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.199998740E09 +++$+++ Let me know what happens after the current protection expires.\u2194 +++$+++ ::::Let me know what happens after the current protection expires.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 12:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

14159 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-24 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.164425520E09 +++$+++ Hi Ptelea - just to let you know, I've got (as far as I'm aware) all of the elm species categorised into [[:Category:Ulmaceae]], and all of the cultivars into [[:Category:Elm cultivars]]. Also cleared all the duplicates (e.g. [Columella (plant)] duplicated [Columella (elm cultivar)], it is now just a redirect). If I've missed any, let me know. -  +++$+++ Hi Ptelea - just to let you know, I've got (as far as I'm aware) all of the elm species categorised into [[:Category:Ulmaceae]], and all of the cultivars into [[:Category:Elm cultivars]]. Also cleared all the duplicates (e.g. [Columella (plant)] duplicated [Columella (elm cultivar)], it is now just a redirect). If I've missed any, let me know. - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 19:32, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
14160 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14159 +++$+++ 14159 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.164836340E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Have a nice trip -  +++$+++ :Thanks! Have a nice trip - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 13:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

276304 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-23 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.216801800E09 +++$+++ It isn't quite true that you have to have a pagefile on the boot partition. You have to have one if you want to write kernel or full dump files, but if you change from the default to no dump file the pagefile on the boot partition isn't needed. I'm not sure about the minidump case. Me, I always use at least kernel dumps. I'm not sure of the best way to reword this, but it seems that a slight reword is called for? Thanks for considering.  +++$+++ It isn't quite true that you have to have a pagefile on the boot partition. You have to have one if you want to write kernel or full dump files, but if you change from the default to no dump file the pagefile on the boot partition isn't needed. I'm not sure about the minidump case. Me, I always use at least kernel dumps. I'm not sure of the best way to reword this, but it seems that a slight reword is called for? Thanks for considering. [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 01:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
276305 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276304 +++$+++ 276304 +++$+++ 2008-07-23 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.216805160E09 +++$+++ Oh yes, good point!  I forgot about that.  By all means, go ahead and update it.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Oh yes, good point!  I forgot about that.  By all means, go ahead and update it.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 02:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

14161 +++$+++ Melburnian +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-21 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.166731500E09 +++$+++ I agree with your idea of renaming the elm cultivar articles which are currently listed by common name to standardise the formats, I think the naming style that you have set i.e. '''Cultivarname (elm cultivar)''' is a good one to stick with. I will move the original articles to their cultivar names using that naming style and then delete the duplicate pages if you have no objections-- +++$+++ I agree with your idea of renaming the elm cultivar articles which are currently listed by common name to standardise the formats, I think the naming style that you have set i.e. '''Cultivarname (elm cultivar)''' is a good one to stick with. I will move the original articles to their cultivar names using that naming style and then delete the duplicate pages if you have no objections--[[User:Melburnian|Melburnian]] 12:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
14162 +++$+++ Melburnian +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14161 +++$+++ 14161 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.166868120E09 +++$+++ No problem, I'm still on a learning curve as well, a Merry Christmas to you too -- +++$+++ :No problem, I'm still on a learning curve as well, a Merry Christmas to you too --[[User:Melburnian|Melburnian]] 02:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

276306 +++$+++ Freed42 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276306 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-25 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.216989600E09 +++$+++ I recall that not even twenty minutes passed before your reverting of my revision to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/GNU\/Linux_naming_controversy#Pronunciation].  Yet more than two days after my prompt talk reply [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:GNU\/Linux_naming_controversy#Pronunciation_section_is_over_the_top] per your suggestion, I see no response.  Please state your concerns.  In the meantime, I will rewrite.  +++$+++ I recall that not even twenty minutes passed before your reverting of my revision to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU/Linux_naming_controversy#Pronunciation].  Yet more than two days after my prompt talk reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:GNU/Linux_naming_controversy#Pronunciation_section_is_over_the_top] per your suggestion, I see no response.  Please state your concerns.  In the meantime, I will rewrite. [[User:Freed42|Freed42]] ([[User talk:Freed42|talk]]) 05:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
276307 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276306 +++$+++ 276306 +++$+++ 2008-07-25 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.216992900E09 +++$+++ Your explanation was fine, so I don't have any objection to it.  The rewritten text is an improvement, too.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Your explanation was fine, so I don't have any objection to it.  The rewritten text is an improvement, too.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 06:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
276308 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276306 +++$+++ 276306 +++$+++ 2008-07-29 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.217353980E09 +++$+++ By the way, I'm replying to this tour-de-force of linguistic excellence on your behalf on a Dell Precision M65 running Vista.  Love and kisses, <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : By the way, I'm replying to this tour-de-force of linguistic excellence on your behalf on a Dell Precision M65 running Vista.  Love and kisses, <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 10:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

122678 +++$+++ Skinny87 +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ 122678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-26 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.303866960E09 +++$+++ Hey, I see you're onto the flame-thrower vehicles section of the PWD article. I don't know if you're interested, but when trying to get stuff together for the Universal Carrier artcle, I brought all the Osprey books on the Carrier, the Churchill and amphibious tanks; they have a lot of info on the Wasp and the Churchill Crocodile. Could I maybe give you a hand with that info by adding it into the article? I can always work in a sub-article if need be. +++$+++ Hey, I see you're onto the flame-thrower vehicles section of the PWD article. I don't know if you're interested, but when trying to get stuff together for the Universal Carrier artcle, I brought all the Osprey books on the Carrier, the Churchill and amphibious tanks; they have a lot of info on the Wasp and the Churchill Crocodile. Could I maybe give you a hand with that info by adding it into the article? I can always work in a sub-article if need be.[[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 18:16, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
122679 +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ 122678 +++$+++ 122678 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.303913520E09 +++$+++ There is already an article on the Crocodile, but none on the Wasp so you might care to add to or create those articles. If you feel there is enough information on the Wasp for a new article I will be happy to help with it. Happy editing.  +++$+++ :There is already an article on the Crocodile, but none on the Wasp so you might care to add to or create those articles. If you feel there is enough information on the Wasp for a new article I will be happy to help with it. Happy editing. [[User:Gaius Cornelius|Gaius Cornelius]] ([[User talk:Gaius Cornelius#top|talk]]) 07:12, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
122680 +++$+++ Skinny87 +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ 122678 +++$+++ 122679 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.303914840E09 +++$+++ Yes, I know what you mean about personal space and sandbox articles. Perhaps if I put together a section on the Wasp and Crocodile (and anything else I can find flame-related for the vehicle section) in my own sandbox, and then you can pick and choose whatever you think fits. I want to get working on the Carrier article anyway, and this will be one section done. How does that sound? +++$+++ ::Yes, I know what you mean about personal space and sandbox articles. Perhaps if I put together a section on the Wasp and Crocodile (and anything else I can find flame-related for the vehicle section) in my own sandbox, and then you can pick and choose whatever you think fits. I want to get working on the Carrier article anyway, and this will be one section done. How does that sound?[[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 07:34, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
122681 +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ 122678 +++$+++ 122678 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.303931160E09 +++$+++ That sounds great! All the best with that.  +++$+++ :That sounds great! All the best with that. [[User:Gaius Cornelius|Gaius Cornelius]] ([[User talk:Gaius Cornelius#top|talk]]) 12:06, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
122682 +++$+++ Skinny87 +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ 122678 +++$+++ 122681 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.304000160E09 +++$+++ Will do. As for your articles, the Fougasse one is a sure-thing for GA. You might get questioned on the use of primary sources, but given the obscure nature of the weapon I can't see that being a difficult question to answer. The other two are rather short; they could do with an infobox each and a little structuring to create a small lede and maybe a subsection or two, merge some sentence fragments, but otherwise wouldn't be too difficult to pass. I managed to get [[sticky bomb]] to GA despite a lack of info, for example.  +++$+++ ::Will do. As for your articles, the Fougasse one is a sure-thing for GA. You might get questioned on the use of primary sources, but given the obscure nature of the weapon I can't see that being a difficult question to answer. The other two are rather short; they could do with an infobox each and a little structuring to create a small lede and maybe a subsection or two, merge some sentence fragments, but otherwise wouldn't be too difficult to pass. I managed to get [[sticky bomb]] to GA despite a lack of info, for example. [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 07:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
122683 +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ 122678 +++$+++ 122678 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.304000460E09 +++$+++ Thanks. By the way, I have a boatload of research on the sticky bomb which could significantly add to that article. Would you like to co-operate on that article - perhaps we could get it to FA!  +++$+++ :Thanks. By the way, I have a boatload of research on the sticky bomb which could significantly add to that article. Would you like to co-operate on that article - perhaps we could get it to FA! [[User:Gaius Cornelius|Gaius Cornelius]] ([[User talk:Gaius Cornelius#top|talk]]) 07:21, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
122684 +++$+++ Skinny87 +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ 122678 +++$+++ 122682 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.304000700E09 +++$+++ Hmmm, that is quite tempting. I have to admit that my time on-wiki isn't a lot these days, as I seem to have lost the will to do big articles. But if you have the info, it might be a good idea to work it up. Maybe add it to a sandbox first to see how it all goes together? I'll try and finish the PWD stuff first.  +++$+++ :::Hmmm, that is quite tempting. I have to admit that my time on-wiki isn't a lot these days, as I seem to have lost the will to do big articles. But if you have the info, it might be a good idea to work it up. Maybe add it to a sandbox first to see how it all goes together? I'll try and finish the PWD stuff first. [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 07:25, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
122685 +++$+++ Skinny87 +++$+++ Gaius Cornelius +++$+++ 122678 +++$+++ 122682 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.304013480E09 +++$+++ Hey, looking at the PWD draft, you have the Churchill Crocodile Osprey book by Fletcher and Bryan. I didn't notice because they aren't in the reflist yet. Do you have their book on the Universal Carrier at hand as well? They're the only two that I have that bear on the Wasp\/Valentine\/Churchill Crocodile, so if you have the latter my help might be redundant lol.  +++$+++ :::Hey, looking at the PWD draft, you have the Churchill Crocodile Osprey book by Fletcher and Bryan. I didn't notice because they aren't in the reflist yet. Do you have their book on the Universal Carrier at hand as well? They're the only two that I have that bear on the Wasp/Valentine/Churchill Crocodile, so if you have the latter my help might be redundant lol. [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 10:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

538452 +++$+++ Steventity +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-10 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.200035760E09 +++$+++ Good job creating the article!  I'd been mulling doing it for a while, but laziness kept winning out.  Good work.  - +++$+++ Good job creating the article!  I'd been mulling doing it for a while, but laziness kept winning out.  Good work.  -[[User:Steventity|steventity]] ([[User talk:Steventity|talk]]) 23:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
538453 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538452 +++$+++ 538452 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.200036540E09 +++$+++ So have I. The deciding factor was there was a lot of good content already on the [[University of Tulsa]] article so there wasn't much new content that was needed.\u2194 +++$+++ :So have I. The deciding factor was there was a lot of good content already on the [[University of Tulsa]] article so there wasn't much new content that was needed.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 23:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
538454 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538452 +++$+++ 538453 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.200041400E09 +++$+++ Oh yeah, my next project is to write a short little article on the tennis center. There was an article about it in a recent TulsaPeople magazine that I'm going to use as a source.\u2194 +++$+++ ::Oh yeah, my next project is to write a short little article on the tennis center. There was an article about it in a recent TulsaPeople magazine that I'm going to use as a source.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 00:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

276309 +++$+++ Hexagon1 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276309 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-31 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.217490240E09 +++$+++ Oy! Calm down. \"''The source is Microsoft's own pronounciation of it on their web site. now stop making bloody daft arguments that favour making the encyclopedia less informative.''\" is hardly a helpful way to get anywhere except edit warring. May I remind you of [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:CIV]]? And [[Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information]]? Now, if you have this source, please by all means, you know.. source the statement. That's generally what we do with.. sources. And seriously, get a grip, editing encyclopaedias is not meant to be an emotionally-charged experience. + +++$+++ Oy! Calm down. "''The source is Microsoft's own pronounciation of it on their web site. now stop making bloody daft arguments that favour making the encyclopedia less informative.''" is hardly a helpful way to get anywhere except edit warring. May I remind you of [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:CIV]]? And [[Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information]]? Now, if you have this source, please by all means, you know.. source the statement. That's generally what we do with.. sources. And seriously, get a grip, editing encyclopaedias is not meant to be an emotionally-charged experience. +[[User:Hexagon1|Hexagon1]] <sup>([[User talk:Hexagon1|t]])</sup> 00:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
276310 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276309 +++$+++ 276309 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.217493120E09 +++$+++ Knock off the wikilawyering. If you think the correct pronunciation of human history's second-highest selling general-purpose operating system somehow qualifies as being \"indiscriminate information\", you're flat-out wrong.  If you can't be bothered to do utterly basic research before you get into an edit war with me, you're going to be called on it.  If you're going to demand a ''source'' for the proper pronunciation of a common English word, you're going to get this response from me: don't be fucking stupid.  The word vista is pronounced \/\u02c8v\u026ast\u0259\/, according to every respectable English dictionary on the planet. If you can't parse IPA, you can listen to the audio recordings [http:\/\/dictionary.reference.com\/browse\/vista here on dictionary.com, for example].  Compare that with, oh, I dunno, [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=KOtqg0REUrI this official Windows Vista advertisement], or [http:\/\/video.msn.com\/video.aspx?mkt=en-us&vid=3acf6772-e4d3-445c-8ca4-d6580cf59ee1 this Bill Gates speech], or [http:\/\/reviews.cnet.com\/4660-3672_7-6661785.html this CNet review].  It's precisely the same.  This is so basic that I'm surprised anyone would ask for a source, and I'm surprised that I have to take ten minutes out of my life to explain this to someone.  Now quit wasting my time, and your own, and find something productive to do with the encyclopedia.  Thank you.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Knock off the wikilawyering. If you think the correct pronunciation of human history's second-highest selling general-purpose operating system somehow qualifies as being "indiscriminate information", you're flat-out wrong.  If you can't be bothered to do utterly basic research before you get into an edit war with me, you're going to be called on it.  If you're going to demand a ''source'' for the proper pronunciation of a common English word, you're going to get this response from me: don't be fucking stupid.  The word vista is pronounced /ˈvɪstə/, according to every respectable English dictionary on the planet. If you can't parse IPA, you can listen to the audio recordings [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/vista here on dictionary.com, for example].  Compare that with, oh, I dunno, [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOtqg0REUrI this official Windows Vista advertisement], or [http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=en-us&vid=3acf6772-e4d3-445c-8ca4-d6580cf59ee1 this Bill Gates speech], or [http://reviews.cnet.com/4660-3672_7-6661785.html this CNet review].  It's precisely the same.  This is so basic that I'm surprised anyone would ask for a source, and I'm surprised that I have to take ten minutes out of my life to explain this to someone.  Now quit wasting my time, and your own, and find something productive to do with the encyclopedia.  Thank you.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 01:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
276311 +++$+++ Hexagon1 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276309 +++$+++ 276310 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.217542560E09 +++$+++ I was wondering whether to even respond to that, but here goes: fuck you. I could talk about your points, but you're obviously hostile for some inexplicable reason. I really don't understand why. ''I honestly don't''. Had you responded validly, I would have loved to have a brief discussion with you over this, for there ''are'' points where I disagreed with you. Your sources seem to indicate it is pronounced with a schwa in both the American and British dialect, I see no problem with admitting that (though I still think [[AuE|mine]] pronounces it differently). That's all it would have taken. When I posted my first message I was not in a hostile mood, in fact whilst writing it I had a joke in there but I removed it since it looked out of place, but I probably should have indicated I am not being hostile. I don't enjoy arguing with randoms, it's not some sort of fetish for me, I was genuinely interested whether I or you were correct in this matter. I find your behaviour saddening, and slightly disturbing the fact you seem to lack patience, a trait not exactly suited for editing a encyclopaedia. I'd left this project once already, I can truthfully say you are making me recollect why. You ''did'' take those ten minutes, you spent them being hostile. You could have spent them being helpful, but you chose to spend them being hostile. That was the choice you made. Frightening. PS: Sorry for having deteriorated into personal attacks, but I really don't appreciate being called 'fucking stupid'. Truth be told, I've had vandals more civil than you. PPS: The part that irritates me the most about this, is that you look like a great editor from skimming your talk. Why, oh why, did you chose to be an arse in response to a simple question. + +++$+++ ::I was wondering whether to even respond to that, but here goes: fuck you. I could talk about your points, but you're obviously hostile for some inexplicable reason. I really don't understand why. ''I honestly don't''. Had you responded validly, I would have loved to have a brief discussion with you over this, for there ''are'' points where I disagreed with you. Your sources seem to indicate it is pronounced with a schwa in both the American and British dialect, I see no problem with admitting that (though I still think [[AuE|mine]] pronounces it differently). That's all it would have taken. When I posted my first message I was not in a hostile mood, in fact whilst writing it I had a joke in there but I removed it since it looked out of place, but I probably should have indicated I am not being hostile. I don't enjoy arguing with randoms, it's not some sort of fetish for me, I was genuinely interested whether I or you were correct in this matter. I find your behaviour saddening, and slightly disturbing the fact you seem to lack patience, a trait not exactly suited for editing a encyclopaedia. I'd left this project once already, I can truthfully say you are making me recollect why. You ''did'' take those ten minutes, you spent them being hostile. You could have spent them being helpful, but you chose to spend them being hostile. That was the choice you made. Frightening. PS: Sorry for having deteriorated into personal attacks, but I really don't appreciate being called 'fucking stupid'. Truth be told, I've had vandals more civil than you. PPS: The part that irritates me the most about this, is that you look like a great editor from skimming your talk. Why, oh why, did you chose to be an arse in response to a simple question. +[[User:Hexagon1|Hexagon1]] <sup>([[User talk:Hexagon1|t]])</sup> 15:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
276312 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276309 +++$+++ 276311 +++$+++ 2008-08-10 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.218380640E09 +++$+++ By all means, leave the project again, '''and don't come back''', if all you're intending on doing is removing useful information from it.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ ::: By all means, leave the project again, '''and don't come back''', if all you're intending on doing is removing useful information from it.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 08:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

14166 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14166 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-14 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.173918840E09 +++$+++ Greetings! I recently ran across several of your articles and brought a discussion about a naming convention for the use of <small><sup>TM<\/sup><\/small> in article titles at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants#Use of \u2122 in article titles?]]. I thought you'd like to participate since you are the principle contributor on those articles. For other information on flora naming conventions, see [[WP:NC (flora)]]. Cheers! -- +++$+++ Greetings! I recently ran across several of your articles and brought a discussion about a naming convention for the use of <small><sup>TM</sup></small> in article titles at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants#Use of ™ in article titles?]]. I thought you'd like to participate since you are the principle contributor on those articles. For other information on flora naming conventions, see [[WP:NC (flora)]]. Cheers! --[[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 17:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
14167 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14166 +++$+++ 14166 +++$+++ 2007-03-14 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.173941400E09 +++$+++ I do beg your pardon for what may seem an offensive question, but I don't know your background, and confusion between [[cultivar]]s, [[plant breeders' rights|PBR]] [[variety (plant)|varieties]] and mere trademarked plant names is very common. Are you able to confirm that you understand the distinction, and the plants in [[:Category:Elm cultivars]] really are cultivars in the strict sense of the word? \u2014 i.e. they have a registered name under the [[International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants]]? If so, then these articles should be located at their cultivar names, for example [[Ulmus 'Zettler'|''Ulmus 'Zettler']], and the trademark under which they are sold should get a mention in the article text.  +++$+++ :I do beg your pardon for what may seem an offensive question, but I don't know your background, and confusion between [[cultivar]]s, [[plant breeders' rights|PBR]] [[variety (plant)|varieties]] and mere trademarked plant names is very common. Are you able to confirm that you understand the distinction, and the plants in [[:Category:Elm cultivars]] really are cultivars in the strict sense of the word? — i.e. they have a registered name under the [[International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants]]? If so, then these articles should be located at their cultivar names, for example [[Ulmus 'Zettler'|''Ulmus 'Zettler']], and the trademark under which they are sold should get a mention in the article text. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 23:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
14168 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14166 +++$+++ 14167 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.173975660E09 +++$+++ ''A cultivar \"in the strict sense of the word\", dear sir or madam, is a plant produced by human selection and vegetatively propagated to perpetuate its characteristics. Niceties such as registration with the ICNCP are not germane to the fundamental meaning of the word. Cultivars of elm have been recognized for almost three centuries, long before the inception of ICNCP I suspect, and that should not be allowed to devalue the horticultural distinction.  As for my inclusion of tradenames on the index page, this was done primarily for the convenience of the reader \/ researcher. It is a fact of life that most plants become generally known by their tradenames, not cv. name, and I therefore think it important to retain the style adopted.  +++$+++ ::''A cultivar "in the strict sense of the word", dear sir or madam, is a plant produced by human selection and vegetatively propagated to perpetuate its characteristics. Niceties such as registration with the ICNCP are not germane to the fundamental meaning of the word. Cultivars of elm have been recognized for almost three centuries, long before the inception of ICNCP I suspect, and that should not be allowed to devalue the horticultural distinction.  As for my inclusion of tradenames on the index page, this was done primarily for the convenience of the reader / researcher. It is a fact of life that most plants become generally known by their tradenames, not cv. name, and I therefore think it important to retain the style adopted. [[User:Ptelea|Ptelea]] 09:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
14169 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14166 +++$+++ 14168 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.173980220E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 10:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
14170 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14166 +++$+++ 14169 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.173982800E09 +++$+++ ''It would seem I'm not alone here. I have four references, all published this century, that make no mention of the ICNCP in their definitions either. My classification is based simply on that given in the references I have to hand, notably the accession lists of major arboreta such as the Arnold (available via the multi-site search engine [http:\/\/rbg-web2.rbge.org.uk\/multisite\/multisite3.php]). I am not in possession of the ICNCP listings, but if such an esteemed establishment as the Arnold Arb. is prepared to classify an elm, eg Bea Schwarz, as a cultivar, then that's good enough for me. Adopt the Wiki definition without question if you will, but I think this will only create unnecessary complexity and confusion, and there's surely enough of that in the sphere of elm taxonomy already. As for trademarks, I note Wiki gudelines permit their usage to discriminate between names used in the pharmaceutical industry, and I would contend that horticulture is analogous here. ::::'' +++$+++ ::::''It would seem I'm not alone here. I have four references, all published this century, that make no mention of the ICNCP in their definitions either. My classification is based simply on that given in the references I have to hand, notably the accession lists of major arboreta such as the Arnold (available via the multi-site search engine [http://rbg-web2.rbge.org.uk/multisite/multisite3.php]). I am not in possession of the ICNCP listings, but if such an esteemed establishment as the Arnold Arb. is prepared to classify an elm, eg Bea Schwarz, as a cultivar, then that's good enough for me. Adopt the Wiki definition without question if you will, but I think this will only create unnecessary complexity and confusion, and there's surely enough of that in the sphere of elm taxonomy already. As for trademarks, I note Wiki gudelines permit their usage to discriminate between names used in the pharmaceutical industry, and I would contend that horticulture is analogous here. ::::''[[User:Ptelea|Ptelea]] 11:20, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
14171 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14166 +++$+++ 14170 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.173984540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::[[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 11:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
14172 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14166 +++$+++ 14171 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.173985440E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.bbg.org\/sci\/taxonomy\/registration.html This list] appears to be a list of all cultivars registered by the AABGA. There are ''no'' ''Ulmus'' cultivars listed. My take on this is there are no ''Ulmus'' cultivars. I have sent an email to the AABGA cultivar registrar, Dr Mark Tebbitt, to confirm.  +++$+++ ::::::[http://www.bbg.org/sci/taxonomy/registration.html This list] appears to be a list of all cultivars registered by the AABGA. There are ''no'' ''Ulmus'' cultivars listed. My take on this is there are no ''Ulmus'' cultivars. I have sent an email to the AABGA cultivar registrar, Dr Mark Tebbitt, to confirm. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 12:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
14173 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14166 +++$+++ 14172 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.173985620E09 +++$+++ One last thing: I just want to say that you've done some great work here, and it is very much appreciated. I hope you don't think I'm crapping all over your efforts by pushing the cultivar issue. All I'm trying to do is bring the article titles into line with Wikipedia convention and best practice.  +++$+++ :::::::One last thing: I just want to say that you've done some great work here, and it is very much appreciated. I hope you don't think I'm crapping all over your efforts by pushing the cultivar issue. All I'm trying to do is bring the article titles into line with Wikipedia convention and best practice. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 12:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
14174 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14166 +++$+++ 14173 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.173987120E09 +++$+++ I hear you.  +++$+++ ::::::::I hear you. [[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 12:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
14175 +++$+++ Hesperian +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14166 +++$+++ 14166 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.174027560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User talk:Hesperian|Hesperian]] 23:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

538459 +++$+++ Sagredo +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-21 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.200979800E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you're pleased with the general appearance.  Before I label all the streets, is the text size, font style, etc OK?   +++$+++ I'm glad you're pleased with the general appearance.  Before I label all the streets, is the text size, font style, etc OK?  [[User:Sagredo|<b><font color ="#009933">Sagredo</font></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sagredo|<font color ="#8FD35D">&#8857;&#9791;&#9792;&#9793;&#9794;&#9795;&#9796;</font>]]</sup> 21:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
538460 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538459 +++$+++ 538459 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.200979860E09 +++$+++ Yes, its all ok.\u2194 +++$+++ :Yes, its all ok.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 21:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

276316 +++$+++ Remember the dot +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276316 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-13 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.218618000E09 +++$+++ While it is true that the PatchGuard issues were not 100% resolved until Vista SP1, this has nothing to do with the Windows Security Center issue that was fixed before Vista was released. Am I mistaken? \u2014 +++$+++ While it is true that the PatchGuard issues were not 100% resolved until Vista SP1, this has nothing to do with the Windows Security Center issue that was fixed before Vista was released. Am I mistaken? —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 02:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
276317 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276316 +++$+++ 276316 +++$+++ 2008-08-13 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.218618960E09 +++$+++ The PatchGuard issue is separate from the WSC issue; this dealt with the lack of a facility for vendors to replace the WSC with their own implementation.  I think reference #6 has the best overview of the situation.  My Internet access is pretty poor right now, so I can't do some proper research to write about how WSC has been changed in SP1.  If you search around for articles on the WSC and Vista SP1, you should be able to turn up something. <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : The PatchGuard issue is separate from the WSC issue; this dealt with the lack of a facility for vendors to replace the WSC with their own implementation.  I think reference #6 has the best overview of the situation.  My Internet access is pretty poor right now, so I can't do some proper research to write about how WSC has been changed in SP1.  If you search around for articles on the WSC and Vista SP1, you should be able to turn up something. <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 02:16, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
276318 +++$+++ Remember the dot +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276316 +++$+++ 276317 +++$+++ 2008-08-13 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.218622620E09 +++$+++ I believe this is the same behavior as Windows XP - WSC can be made dormant (stopping the duplicate warning messages) but not removed entirely. As far as I can tell, this was a compromise that Symantec, McAfee, and Microsoft were happy with. \u2014 +++$+++ ::I believe this is the same behavior as Windows XP - WSC can be made dormant (stopping the duplicate warning messages) but not removed entirely. As far as I can tell, this was a compromise that Symantec, McAfee, and Microsoft were happy with. —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 03:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
276319 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276316 +++$+++ 276318 +++$+++ 2008-08-13 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.218629880E09 +++$+++ Arguing that this information doesn't belong would be like arguing that most of the Longhorn-era details in [[Development of Windows Vista]] doesn't belong because much of it didn't make the final cut.  I think it needs to be expanded upon and made more current, not deleted... <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ ::: Arguing that this information doesn't belong would be like arguing that most of the Longhorn-era details in [[Development of Windows Vista]] doesn't belong because much of it didn't make the final cut.  I think it needs to be expanded upon and made more current, not deleted... <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 05:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
276320 +++$+++ Remember the dot +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276316 +++$+++ 276319 +++$+++ 2008-08-14 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.218699180E09 +++$+++ I'm fine with including historic information, but it needs to be marked as such. Currently, you do not so much as mention that the issues with WSC were ever resolved. I suggest creating a section titled \"Development\" for discussing the considerations and criticisms that went into WSC. \u2014 +++$+++ ::::I'm fine with including historic information, but it needs to be marked as such. Currently, you do not so much as mention that the issues with WSC were ever resolved. I suggest creating a section titled "Development" for discussing the considerations and criticisms that went into WSC. —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 00:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
276321 +++$+++ Remember the dot +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276316 +++$+++ 276319 +++$+++ 2008-08-14 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.218700140E09 +++$+++ OK, I've merged it into the \"Version history\" section under \"Windows Vista\". At the very least this is more specific than putting it into the Criticism section. \u2014 +++$+++ ::::OK, I've merged it into the "Version history" section under "Windows Vista". At the very least this is more specific than putting it into the Criticism section. —[[User:Remember the dot|Remember the dot]] <sup>([[User talk:Remember the dot|talk]])</sup> 00:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

538465 +++$+++ EconomistBR +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538465 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-02 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.201966800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:EconomistBR|EconomistBR]] ([[User talk:EconomistBR|talk]]) 07:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
538466 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538465 +++$+++ 538465 +++$+++ 2008-02-02 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.202003460E09 +++$+++ Here's the thing. I created it and was the only editor, so it was in my right to delete it. Only after creating it and implementing it, did I receive feedback from other editors on why this practice is and should be discouraged. ALL references should be visible on the page without having to scroll. I can't remember where this discussion took place but, in the end, I agreed with the consensus and deleted the template. References should not be hidden for any reason, which is what this template does.\u2194 +++$+++ :Here's the thing. I created it and was the only editor, so it was in my right to delete it. Only after creating it and implementing it, did I receive feedback from other editors on why this practice is and should be discouraged. ALL references should be visible on the page without having to scroll. I can't remember where this discussion took place but, in the end, I agreed with the consensus and deleted the template. References should not be hidden for any reason, which is what this template does.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 17:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

14179 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-09 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.178773380E09 +++$+++ I like your additions to this article, especially the picture, Thankyou. Just out of curiosity, do you know where on the picket boat the torpedo would have been attached?-- +++$+++ I like your additions to this article, especially the picture, Thankyou. Just out of curiosity, do you know where on the picket boat the torpedo would have been attached?--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] 22:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
14180 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14179 +++$+++ 14179 +++$+++ 2007-05-10 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.178817840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that, it was a very interesting tale. Did you actually speak to Bill Head or was that from a book? If the latter, I'd be interested to read it myself.-- +++$+++ :Thanks for that, it was a very interesting tale. Did you actually speak to Bill Head or was that from a book? If the latter, I'd be interested to read it myself.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] 10:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
14181 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14179 +++$+++ 14180 +++$+++ 2007-05-10 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.178826000E09 +++$+++ Thanks, couldn't find the book on amazon but I'll keep an eye out for it. Do you know Bill Head? I had some dealings with the Submarine Museum during my last job, but never actually spoke to him in person.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks, couldn't find the book on amazon but I'll keep an eye out for it. Do you know Bill Head? I had some dealings with the Submarine Museum during my last job, but never actually spoke to him in person.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] 12:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
14182 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14179 +++$+++ 14181 +++$+++ 2007-05-10 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.178828820E09 +++$+++ Thankyou very much. All the best.-- +++$+++ :::Thankyou very much. All the best.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] 13:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

276326 +++$+++ Hutch48 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-11 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.221136800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Hutch48|Hutch48]] ([[User talk:Hutch48|talk]]) 05:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
276327 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276326 +++$+++ 276326 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.221182700E09 +++$+++ Good luck... <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Good luck... <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 18:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

14186 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-23 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.185220320E09 +++$+++ Greetings! Regarding the name of this page, I was going to move it to a more appropriate name (use of \u2122 is discouraged), but I didn't know what the proper cultivar name was. Convention established by [[WP:PLANTS]] is that the title of these articles should be: [[Genus 'Cultivar Name']]. So should this page be moved to [[Ulmus 'UPMTF Bosque']] or [[Ulmus 'Bosque']]? All of your cultivar pages should be renamed to this convention. Cheers, -- +++$+++ Greetings! Regarding the name of this page, I was going to move it to a more appropriate name (use of ™ is discouraged), but I didn't know what the proper cultivar name was. Convention established by [[WP:PLANTS]] is that the title of these articles should be: [[Genus 'Cultivar Name']]. So should this page be moved to [[Ulmus 'UPMTF Bosque']] or [[Ulmus 'Bosque']]? All of your cultivar pages should be renamed to this convention. Cheers, --[[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 12:52, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
14187 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14186 +++$+++ 14186 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.185225540E09 +++$+++ You've got me again. I'll duly add the Ulmus to the cultivar pages, but regret I find the ruling on TM difficult to understand. Two names are often awarded to a cultivar, one being its registered \/ patented  tradename. Irritating though this habit may be, I feel it important we identify which is which by retaining the suffix.  So, yes, Ulmus UPMTF BosqueTM. Regards,  +++$+++ :You've got me again. I'll duly add the Ulmus to the cultivar pages, but regret I find the ruling on TM difficult to understand. Two names are often awarded to a cultivar, one being its registered / patented  tradename. Irritating though this habit may be, I feel it important we identify which is which by retaining the suffix.  So, yes, Ulmus UPMTF BosqueTM. Regards, [[User:Ptelea|Ptelea]] 14:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
14188 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14186 +++$+++ 14187 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.185228480E09 +++$+++ I'm not at all familiar with elm cultivars, so help me out here. What is the UPMTF in the article title? I assume Bosque is the registered name and that's what it's been published as? If that's correct, the article should be titled at [[Ulmus 'Bosque']]. I'm going to begin another conversation with the folks at [[WT:PLANTS]] shortly to discuss including all of the consensus opinions regarding cultivars, subgenera, sections, vars, hybrids, etc. in our naming convention for flora. Cheers, -- +++$+++ ::I'm not at all familiar with elm cultivars, so help me out here. What is the UPMTF in the article title? I assume Bosque is the registered name and that's what it's been published as? If that's correct, the article should be titled at [[Ulmus 'Bosque']]. I'm going to begin another conversation with the folks at [[WT:PLANTS]] shortly to discuss including all of the consensus opinions regarding cultivars, subgenera, sections, vars, hybrids, etc. in our naming convention for flora. Cheers, --[[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 15:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
14189 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14186 +++$+++ 14188 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.185231540E09 +++$+++ Regret I've no idea what the UPMTF stands for, most unusual to see what I presume are initials adopted as a cultivar name. If I find the time, I'll contact the Angel Creek Nurseries and ask them.  I only chanced on it after reading the Colorado State University's page on the national elm trials it is coordinating, and looking up the nursery to see what else they had raised. Regards.  +++$+++ :::Regret I've no idea what the UPMTF stands for, most unusual to see what I presume are initials adopted as a cultivar name. If I find the time, I'll contact the Angel Creek Nurseries and ask them.  I only chanced on it after reading the Colorado State University's page on the national elm trials it is coordinating, and looking up the nursery to see what else they had raised. Regards. [[User:Ptelea|Ptelea]] 15:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
14190 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14186 +++$+++ 14189 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.185234240E09 +++$+++ Curious indeed! I noticed a few others that had similar cultivar names. Sorry I was confused earlier in my above message. So Bosque is the trade name and the unknown acronym UPMTF is the cultivar name. I suppose then the correct title should then be [[Ulmus 'UPMTF']], right? Best, -- +++$+++ ::::Curious indeed! I noticed a few others that had similar cultivar names. Sorry I was confused earlier in my above message. So Bosque is the trade name and the unknown acronym UPMTF is the cultivar name. I suppose then the correct title should then be [[Ulmus 'UPMTF']], right? Best, --[[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 16:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
14191 +++$+++ Melburnian +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14186 +++$+++ 14190 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.185262680E09 +++$+++ After coming across [http:\/\/www.moonstreefarm.com\/bosque.htm this] I'm guessing that UPMTF stands for ''Ulmus parvifolia'' Moon's Tree Farm. -- +++$+++ :::::After coming across [http://www.moonstreefarm.com/bosque.htm this] I'm guessing that UPMTF stands for ''Ulmus parvifolia'' Moon's Tree Farm. --[[User:Melburnian|Melburnian]] 00:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

538478 +++$+++ SatyrTN +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-07 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.202456880E09 +++$+++ Thanks! -- <span style=\"background: #EECCFF;\"> +++$+++ Thanks! -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">[[User:SatyrTN|SatyrTN]] <small>([[User talk:SatyrTN|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/SatyrTN|contribs]])</small></span> 23:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
538479 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.202508720E09 +++$+++ It is marking articles as stubs that are not. Such as [[1977 college football season]], [[2002 Ohio State Buckeyes football team]]. It also tagged some articles, such as [[2002 Sugar Bowl]], as stub that, while they are stubs, do not have a stub template (so how is it basing this decision to mark as stub?).\u2194 +++$+++ :It is marking articles as stubs that are not. Such as [[1977 college football season]], [[2002 Ohio State Buckeyes football team]]. It also tagged some articles, such as [[2002 Sugar Bowl]], as stub that, while they are stubs, do not have a stub template (so how is it basing this decision to mark as stub?).↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 14:12, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
538480 +++$+++ SatyrTN +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538479 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.202509980E09 +++$+++ I should probably only guess if there ''are'' other project banners, though, and if there aren't I should leave it empty? -- <span style=\"background: #EECCFF;\"> +++$+++ ::I should probably only guess if there ''are'' other project banners, though, and if there aren't I should leave it empty? -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">[[User:SatyrTN|SatyrTN]] <small>([[User talk:SatyrTN|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/SatyrTN|contribs]])</small></span> 14:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
538481 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538480 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.202512680E09 +++$+++ Wait, if it finds an FA, GA or Stub template, it marks it a stub? Shouldn't it only mark it as a stub if it finds a stub template? I can't imagine a scenario where an FA or GA would be a stub. Or are you saying if it finds an FA or GA template it marks it FA or GA class, respectively? If it finds other banners, averaging is fine. If it finds no banners, no stub templates, no other indication, then leave it blank.\u2194 +++$+++ :::Wait, if it finds an FA, GA or Stub template, it marks it a stub? Shouldn't it only mark it as a stub if it finds a stub template? I can't imagine a scenario where an FA or GA would be a stub. Or are you saying if it finds an FA or GA template it marks it FA or GA class, respectively? If it finds other banners, averaging is fine. If it finds no banners, no stub templates, no other indication, then leave it blank.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 15:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
538482 +++$+++ SatyrTN +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538481 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.202513100E09 +++$+++ ROTFL!  My bad - if it finds a FA, GA, or Stub template, it labels the article appropriately :)  I'll change it to leave it blank if there are no indications at all and will run another test of 10 or so. -- <span style=\"background: #EECCFF;\"> +++$+++ ::::ROTFL!  My bad - if it finds a FA, GA, or Stub template, it labels the article appropriately :)  I'll change it to leave it blank if there are no indications at all and will run another test of 10 or so. -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">[[User:SatyrTN|SatyrTN]] <small>([[User talk:SatyrTN|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/SatyrTN|contribs]])</small></span> 15:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
538483 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538482 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.202513220E09 +++$+++ I figured that was a typo. Thanks. I'll review again when done.\u2194 +++$+++ :::::I figured that was a typo. Thanks. I'll review again when done.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 15:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
538484 +++$+++ SatyrTN +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538483 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.202535120E09 +++$+++ Thanks! -- <span style=\"background: #EECCFF;\"> +++$+++ ::::::Thanks! -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">[[User:SatyrTN|SatyrTN]] <small>([[User talk:SatyrTN|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/SatyrTN|contribs]])</small></span> 21:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
538485 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538484 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.202556480E09 +++$+++ I need to do a more thorough check tomorrow, but how did it know to assess [[2005 Sun Bowl]] as a stub? Sorry if I'm being picky, but after it runs through thousands of unranked articles, if 2% are wrong, that's a lot of manual cleanup. I do really appreciate your work and I can't wait to get this straightened out.\u2194 +++$+++ :::::::I need to do a more thorough check tomorrow, but how did it know to assess [[2005 Sun Bowl]] as a stub? Sorry if I'm being picky, but after it runs through thousands of unranked articles, if 2% are wrong, that's a lot of manual cleanup. I do really appreciate your work and I can't wait to get this straightened out.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 03:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
538486 +++$+++ SatyrTN +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538485 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.202571780E09 +++$+++ Hm.  Because there were other project banners on the page, and the average rating of the other banners was zero - a stub. I can probably adjust that so that there's \"at least one ''rating''\" rather than \"at least one ''banner''\".  Let me know. -- <span style=\"background: #EECCFF;\"> +++$+++ ::::::::Hm.  Because there were other project banners on the page, and the average rating of the other banners was zero - a stub. I can probably adjust that so that there's "at least one ''rating''" rather than "at least one ''banner''".  Let me know. -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">[[User:SatyrTN|SatyrTN]] <small>([[User talk:SatyrTN|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/SatyrTN|contribs]])</small></span> 07:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
538487 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538486 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.202624280E09 +++$+++ Yes, do that. An article could very easily be start or B quality and simply unassessed by a project.\u2194 +++$+++ :::::::::Yes, do that. An article could very easily be start or B quality and simply unassessed by a project.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 22:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
538488 +++$+++ SatyrTN +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538487 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.202681100E09 +++$+++ K - code changed so that at least one project *rating* needs to exist before the bot will guess based on that. -- <span style=\"background: #EECCFF;\"> +++$+++ ::::::::::K - code changed so that at least one project *rating* needs to exist before the bot will guess based on that. -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">[[User:SatyrTN|SatyrTN]] <small>([[User talk:SatyrTN|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/SatyrTN|contribs]])</small></span> 14:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
538489 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538488 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.202710080E09 +++$+++ Ok. Great.\u2194 +++$+++ :::::::::::Ok. Great.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 22:08, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
538490 +++$+++ SatyrTN +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538489 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.202711400E09 +++$+++ Shall I go ahead and run the bot on all articles? -- <span style=\"background: #EECCFF;\"> +++$+++ ::::::::::::Shall I go ahead and run the bot on all articles? -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">[[User:SatyrTN|SatyrTN]] <small>([[User talk:SatyrTN|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/SatyrTN|contribs]])</small></span> 22:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
538491 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538478 +++$+++ 538490 +++$+++ 2008-02-11 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.202726880E09 +++$+++ Yes.\u2194 +++$+++ :::::::::::::Yes.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 02:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

14192 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-26 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.185478680E09 +++$+++ Greetings again! I'm a bit confused about all the pages you moved recently. Most of the cultivar pages look correct, but the species page titles are incorrect. Read through [[WP:NC (flora)]] - if the species is economically or culturally significant enough (such as [[Maple]]), then it should remain at its common name. If not, it should be moved to the scientific name. But not: \"Ulmus glabra - Wych Elm\". We don't want both in the title since we're not just titling a page here, we're placing it for ease of searching and linking. I don't have the admin powers necessary to move it over the redirects with more than one edit, so at the moment this is the way they remain until we can get an administrator to move them all. I also meant to tell you to come visit [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (flora)]] where we're discussing the additions to the naming convention and we're specifically discussing cultivars and tradenames. So come on over and discuss with us! Cheers, -- +++$+++ Greetings again! I'm a bit confused about all the pages you moved recently. Most of the cultivar pages look correct, but the species page titles are incorrect. Read through [[WP:NC (flora)]] - if the species is economically or culturally significant enough (such as [[Maple]]), then it should remain at its common name. If not, it should be moved to the scientific name. But not: "Ulmus glabra - Wych Elm". We don't want both in the title since we're not just titling a page here, we're placing it for ease of searching and linking. I don't have the admin powers necessary to move it over the redirects with more than one edit, so at the moment this is the way they remain until we can get an administrator to move them all. I also meant to tell you to come visit [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (flora)]] where we're discussing the additions to the naming convention and we're specifically discussing cultivars and tradenames. So come on over and discuss with us! Cheers, --[[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 12:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
14193 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14192 +++$+++ 14192 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.185479880E09 +++$+++ Hello again. Thanks for your note. My changes were specifically \"for ease of searching and linking\", mindful that common names for a species tend to vary, particularly when they cross the Atlantic, viz. Wych Elm \/ Scots Elm, European White Elm \/ Russian Elm. Moreover, a number of the more obscure Chinese species have now been accorded common names by the Morton Arboretum in Illinois, but these have yet to be widely adopted. By adding the scientific name, I'd hoped to avoid that, but if again it conflicts with WP protocol, then I'll have to undo it. As a general point, I think it looks untidy and inconsistent to waver from common to scientific, and without parallel in other references. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello again. Thanks for your note. My changes were specifically "for ease of searching and linking", mindful that common names for a species tend to vary, particularly when they cross the Atlantic, viz. Wych Elm / Scots Elm, European White Elm / Russian Elm. Moreover, a number of the more obscure Chinese species have now been accorded common names by the Morton Arboretum in Illinois, but these have yet to be widely adopted. By adding the scientific name, I'd hoped to avoid that, but if again it conflicts with WP protocol, then I'll have to undo it. As a general point, I think it looks untidy and inconsistent to waver from common to scientific, and without parallel in other references. Regards, [[User:Ptelea|Ptelea]] 12:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
14194 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14192 +++$+++ 14193 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.185481680E09 +++$+++ That's actually why we created the flora naming convention. Early on, I was involved in a dispute over ''[[Cytisus scoparius]]'', which is called [[Scotch broom]] in the US but apparently rarely called that in the UK (often called only \"Broom\" there). From later disputes just like that, the community decided to adopt a naming convention that allows for common names when they're really important like [[maple]], [[coffee]], [[potato]] which also have a single dominant common name. All others should be moved to their scientific name alone, not a combination of scientific and common name in the title. It may seem inconsistent and you have a good point about it being unparalleled with respect to other references, but Wikipedia itself is unparalleled. Most other references are written for a single English-speaking audience, not an international one. Wikipedia also has a single general naming convention ([[WP:NC]]) that states: \"Generally, article naming should prefer what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.\" [[WP:NC (flora)]] goes against that somewhat broad convention for the sake of reducing arguments about who has the majority of English speakers--British, Commonwealth, American, etc. In your specific situation, what I would suggest is creating a [[:Category:Elm species by common name]] and add the category to the common name redirects. Best, -- +++$+++ ::That's actually why we created the flora naming convention. Early on, I was involved in a dispute over ''[[Cytisus scoparius]]'', which is called [[Scotch broom]] in the US but apparently rarely called that in the UK (often called only "Broom" there). From later disputes just like that, the community decided to adopt a naming convention that allows for common names when they're really important like [[maple]], [[coffee]], [[potato]] which also have a single dominant common name. All others should be moved to their scientific name alone, not a combination of scientific and common name in the title. It may seem inconsistent and you have a good point about it being unparalleled with respect to other references, but Wikipedia itself is unparalleled. Most other references are written for a single English-speaking audience, not an international one. Wikipedia also has a single general naming convention ([[WP:NC]]) that states: "Generally, article naming should prefer what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature." [[WP:NC (flora)]] goes against that somewhat broad convention for the sake of reducing arguments about who has the majority of English speakers--British, Commonwealth, American, etc. In your specific situation, what I would suggest is creating a [[:Category:Elm species by common name]] and add the category to the common name redirects. Best, --[[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 13:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

276337 +++$+++ DMahalko +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-06 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.223354280E09 +++$+++ I think most of your deletions should be reverted as being too narrow-minded about the topic being discussed.  +++$+++ I think most of your deletions should be reverted as being too narrow-minded about the topic being discussed. [[User:DMahalko|DMahalko]] ([[User talk:DMahalko|talk]]) 21:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
276338 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 2008-10-06 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.223361780E09 +++$+++ But before you go ahead with that, I have to remind you that the \"3.2 gigabyte barrier\" section you wrote in the [[conventional memory]] article was deleted outright because you failed to provide any reliable sources at all.  You actually [http:\/\/www.google.ca\/search?hl=en&q=%223.2+gigabyte+barrier%22&btnG=Search&meta= made the term up]!  Lack of attribution is a big problem on Wikipedia; people write stuff into the encyclopedia based on their own experiences, or maybe stuff they read about on forums or heard from friends, but don't provide proper, reliable sources as is required by Wikipedia's verifiability policy.  Surely you aren't expecting that you can write just anything off the top of your head, into the encyclopedia, and not have it challenged or deleted at some point.  Attribution ensures that the information we publish is accurate -- or, at least, the inaccuracies can be be faulted on our sources.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : But before you go ahead with that, I have to remind you that the "3.2 gigabyte barrier" section you wrote in the [[conventional memory]] article was deleted outright because you failed to provide any reliable sources at all.  You actually [http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=%223.2+gigabyte+barrier%22&btnG=Search&meta= made the term up]!  Lack of attribution is a big problem on Wikipedia; people write stuff into the encyclopedia based on their own experiences, or maybe stuff they read about on forums or heard from friends, but don't provide proper, reliable sources as is required by Wikipedia's verifiability policy.  Surely you aren't expecting that you can write just anything off the top of your head, into the encyclopedia, and not have it challenged or deleted at some point.  Attribution ensures that the information we publish is accurate -- or, at least, the inaccuracies can be be faulted on our sources.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 23:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
276339 +++$+++ DMahalko +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276338 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.223370120E09 +++$+++ The [[Otto engine]] article I recently started is not as absolutely perfectly perfect as you may perfectly want it, and it will likely never have any good cites because they are simply not available. However the content is about as good as it gets. I suppose you're going to pop over and delete all that now too since I failed to cite any reliable sources.  +++$+++ :: The [[Otto engine]] article I recently started is not as absolutely perfectly perfect as you may perfectly want it, and it will likely never have any good cites because they are simply not available. However the content is about as good as it gets. I suppose you're going to pop over and delete all that now too since I failed to cite any reliable sources. [[User:DMahalko|DMahalko]] ([[User talk:DMahalko|talk]]) 02:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276340 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276339 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.223382960E09 +++$+++ Sorry but no, your discussino of the \"32-bit memory hole issue\" was not \"pretty close\" at all. For example, 64-bit hardware is not required to work around it, only full support of [[Physical Address Extension]]. And as Warren said this topic is completely irrelevant to \"conventional memory\".  +++$+++ ::: Sorry but no, your discussino of the "32-bit memory hole issue" was not "pretty close" at all. For example, 64-bit hardware is not required to work around it, only full support of [[Physical Address Extension]]. And as Warren said this topic is completely irrelevant to "conventional memory". [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 05:36, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276341 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276339 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.223383140E09 +++$+++ p.s. [http:\/\/blogs.technet.com\/markrussinovich\/archive\/2008\/07\/21\/3092070.aspx here] is a good description of the issue. Note that the issue is specific to \"consumer\" versions of Windows. Windows Server 2003 (32 bit) doesn't have the issue. Nor do various versions of Linux.  +++$+++ ::: p.s. [http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2008/07/21/3092070.aspx here] is a good description of the issue. Note that the issue is specific to "consumer" versions of Windows. Windows Server 2003 (32 bit) doesn't have the issue. Nor do various versions of Linux. [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 05:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276342 +++$+++ DMahalko +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276341 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.223386140E09 +++$+++ Conventional memory was an arbitrary structural design limitation due to some address space being reserved for hardware use. The (variable) loss of memory for (some) 32-bit operating systems is due to the same reserved-hardware-region issues, as documented on that very Russinovich page your \"citing at me\", and thus the past limitations of the conventional memory architecture repeat themselves in modern architectures -- which is the whole point that article section was trying to make, and which is the point you are missing completely. Providing a historical perspective of how past design limitations have repeated themselves in subsequent \"modern\" system architectures does not distract from the primary topic at hand.  +++$+++ :::: Conventional memory was an arbitrary structural design limitation due to some address space being reserved for hardware use. The (variable) loss of memory for (some) 32-bit operating systems is due to the same reserved-hardware-region issues, as documented on that very Russinovich page your "citing at me", and thus the past limitations of the conventional memory architecture repeat themselves in modern architectures -- which is the whole point that article section was trying to make, and which is the point you are missing completely. Providing a historical perspective of how past design limitations have repeated themselves in subsequent "modern" system architectures does not distract from the primary topic at hand. [[User:DMahalko|DMahalko]] ([[User talk:DMahalko|talk]]) 06:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276343 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276342 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.223388840E09 +++$+++ Perhaps not in a magazine article, but it does distract in an encyclopedia. There's a difference in styles.  +++$+++ ::::: Perhaps not in a magazine article, but it does distract in an encyclopedia. There's a difference in styles. [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 07:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276344 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.223432220E09 +++$+++ That is a completely false accusation against Warren. He didn't \"bring in\" anybody. I happen to have Warren's talk page in my watchlist because we've had other exchanges recently. I'm here purely on my own volition.  +++$+++ ::::::: That is a completely false accusation against Warren. He didn't "bring in" anybody. I happen to have Warren's talk page in my watchlist because we've had other exchanges recently. I'm here purely on my own volition. [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 19:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276345 +++$+++ DMahalko +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276341 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.223386140E09 +++$+++ PAE which you are citing as a 32-bit workaround, was originally only something that special server software utilized, such as high-end database programs. The fact that more and more modern Windows programs can support PAE does not obviate the fact that the 32-bit hardware limitations affected (and still affect) many computer systems, just as conventional memory forced people to fool with DOS extenders and drivers that had to be built to \"load high\" way back when. Oh, but I guess these analogies to the past are getting lost on you.  +++$+++ :::: PAE which you are citing as a 32-bit workaround, was originally only something that special server software utilized, such as high-end database programs. The fact that more and more modern Windows programs can support PAE does not obviate the fact that the 32-bit hardware limitations affected (and still affect) many computer systems, just as conventional memory forced people to fool with DOS extenders and drivers that had to be built to "load high" way back when. Oh, but I guess these analogies to the past are getting lost on you. [[User:DMahalko|DMahalko]] ([[User talk:DMahalko|talk]]) 06:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276346 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276345 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.223388840E09 +++$+++ The point of bringing up PAE to you is to show you that you are mistaken when you claim that 64-bit hardware is required to get past the 3.2 GiB \"barrier\".  Support for a full 4 GiB, or even more, of RAM has nothing to do with 64-bit hardware. It has to do with how virtual addresses (which are the addresses that are 32-bit in a 32-bit environment, and 64-bit in etc.) are translated to physical addresses (whose bit sizes come from the page table entries). PAE is not something that \"programs\" can get to at all in a protected OS environment, and it is not a \"workaround\" (despite what the white paper from Sun Microsystems says). It is the same address translation scheme that has always been done, with one more level of table lookup and wider page table entries, the latter providing more bits of physical address than are possible without it.  It's something the operating system supports and (again, despite what the Sun white paper says) is completely transparent to application programs, since apps use only virtual addresses. By supporting PAE, an operating system can not only use all 4 GiB of RAM in a 32-bit system so equipped, it can use considerably more. How much more depends on the specific chip, but the first CPUs that supported PAE could generate 36-bit physical addresses, hence 64 GiB of RAM. Incidently on x64 in \"long mode\" the page table format looks very much like PAE-format page tables, but with yet an additional stage of lookup table.    +++$+++ ::::: The point of bringing up PAE to you is to show you that you are mistaken when you claim that 64-bit hardware is required to get past the 3.2 GiB "barrier".  Support for a full 4 GiB, or even more, of RAM has nothing to do with 64-bit hardware. It has to do with how virtual addresses (which are the addresses that are 32-bit in a 32-bit environment, and 64-bit in etc.) are translated to physical addresses (whose bit sizes come from the page table entries). PAE is not something that "programs" can get to at all in a protected OS environment, and it is not a "workaround" (despite what the white paper from Sun Microsystems says). It is the same address translation scheme that has always been done, with one more level of table lookup and wider page table entries, the latter providing more bits of physical address than are possible without it.  It's something the operating system supports and (again, despite what the Sun white paper says) is completely transparent to application programs, since apps use only virtual addresses. By supporting PAE, an operating system can not only use all 4 GiB of RAM in a 32-bit system so equipped, it can use considerably more. How much more depends on the specific chip, but the first CPUs that supported PAE could generate 36-bit physical addresses, hence 64 GiB of RAM. Incidently on x64 in "long mode" the page table format looks very much like PAE-format page tables, but with yet an additional stage of lookup table.   [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 07:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276347 +++$+++ DMahalko +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276346 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.223429280E09 +++$+++ For all this technical blather, it does nothing to resolve the fact that such architecture limitations exist and continue to plague modern computer systems. The very computer I write this with, outfitted with dual 512meg 8800GT video cards, 4 gig of memory, and Windows XP 32-bit (hardly an obscure operating system choice) shows only 2.75 gig available. As such this is a perfect example of such architecture limitations. The fact that you are arguing around it with very specific exceptions and with very specific attacks on what I wrote (3.2 vs a variable size) does not invalidate the fact that this (still) is a very real problem.  +++$+++ :::::: For all this technical blather, it does nothing to resolve the fact that such architecture limitations exist and continue to plague modern computer systems. The very computer I write this with, outfitted with dual 512meg 8800GT video cards, 4 gig of memory, and Windows XP 32-bit (hardly an obscure operating system choice) shows only 2.75 gig available. As such this is a perfect example of such architecture limitations. The fact that you are arguing around it with very specific exceptions and with very specific attacks on what I wrote (3.2 vs a variable size) does not invalidate the fact that this (still) is a very real problem. [[User:DMahalko|DMahalko]] ([[User talk:DMahalko|talk]]) 18:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276348 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276347 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.223432220E09 +++$+++ I am sorry I didn't explain myself clearly, for it appears that you are missing the essential point:  What you are calling the \"3.2 GiB barrier\" is not at all analagous or historically tied to or related to the 640 KiB barrier, because the 3.2 GiB barrier is not an architectural limitation of either the hardware or the software, or the combination of the two, as was the 640 KiB size of \"conventional memory\".  +++$+++ ::::::: I am sorry I didn't explain myself clearly, for it appears that you are missing the essential point:  What you are calling the "3.2 GiB barrier" is not at all analagous or historically tied to or related to the 640 KiB barrier, because the 3.2 GiB barrier is not an architectural limitation of either the hardware or the software, or the combination of the two, as was the 640 KiB size of "conventional memory". [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 19:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276349 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276347 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.223432220E09 +++$+++ You're probably going to call me on the fact that I didn't point this out before, and it's true, I didn't; I hadn't thought it through. But now I have, and this is the conclusion. The \"3.2 GiB barrier\" is merely a ''choice'' made by the developers of Windows \"desktop\" operating systems, XP SP2 and later. These operating systems are architecturally capable of letting you see all of your 4 GiB RAM on your system, but there is a purely artificial limit in them, such that they will not access RAM with addresses higher than 4 GiB. Were you running any of several other operating systems (including some 32 bit ones, and even some Windows 32-bit ones) you would be seeing all of your 4 GiB RAM despite the \"PCI hole.\"   +++$+++ ::::::: You're probably going to call me on the fact that I didn't point this out before, and it's true, I didn't; I hadn't thought it through. But now I have, and this is the conclusion. The "3.2 GiB barrier" is merely a ''choice'' made by the developers of Windows "desktop" operating systems, XP SP2 and later. These operating systems are architecturally capable of letting you see all of your 4 GiB RAM on your system, but there is a purely artificial limit in them, such that they will not access RAM with addresses higher than 4 GiB. Were you running any of several other operating systems (including some 32 bit ones, and even some Windows 32-bit ones) you would be seeing all of your 4 GiB RAM despite the "PCI hole."  [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 19:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276350 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276347 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.223432220E09 +++$+++ \"Technical blather\" is apparently uninteresting to you, but even so, I will point out that XP SP2 does enable PAE for purposes of enabling the [[NX|no execute]] feature. i.e. unless you're either a) running on very old hardware (which you're not if you're running those video cards), or b) running with noexecute disabled completely, you're already running with PAE turned on. But apparently some third party driver writers for some common consumer hardware just can't be bothered to support physical addresses wider than 32 bits, so (after a large number of online crash analysis reports) the Windows kernel team decided to artificially disable access to physical addresses above 4 GiB on consumer OSs, XP SP2 and later.  +++$+++ ::::::: "Technical blather" is apparently uninteresting to you, but even so, I will point out that XP SP2 does enable PAE for purposes of enabling the [[NX|no execute]] feature. i.e. unless you're either a) running on very old hardware (which you're not if you're running those video cards), or b) running with noexecute disabled completely, you're already running with PAE turned on. But apparently some third party driver writers for some common consumer hardware just can't be bothered to support physical addresses wider than 32 bits, so (after a large number of online crash analysis reports) the Windows kernel team decided to artificially disable access to physical addresses above 4 GiB on consumer OSs, XP SP2 and later. [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 19:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276351 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276347 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.223432220E09 +++$+++ As I see it, about the only valid relationship that can be drawn between these two \"barriers\" is to note that despite superficial similarities they do ''not'' have common origins and are not really related to one another.  +++$+++ ::::::: As I see it, about the only valid relationship that can be drawn between these two "barriers" is to note that despite superficial similarities they do ''not'' have common origins and are not really related to one another. [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 19:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276352 +++$+++ DMahalko +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276346 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.223429280E09 +++$+++ Your primary intent here is to just throw in my face how ''wrong wrong wrong'' I was to write anything at all, but as I say nothing better was available, and now nothing better IS available at all due to Warren's complete deletion of that text. Clearly you should be writing this PCI hole article rather than me since you ''obviously'' understand the topic so well, but it appears to me your primary interest here is just to show off your superior technical knowledge over me rather than trying to actually contribute to the encyclopedia, which is what the original intent of my editing was attempting to do. ''(Spirit vs Letter)''  +++$+++ :::::: Your primary intent here is to just throw in my face how ''wrong wrong wrong'' I was to write anything at all, but as I say nothing better was available, and now nothing better IS available at all due to Warren's complete deletion of that text. Clearly you should be writing this PCI hole article rather than me since you ''obviously'' understand the topic so well, but it appears to me your primary interest here is just to show off your superior technical knowledge over me rather than trying to actually contribute to the encyclopedia, which is what the original intent of my editing was attempting to do. ''(Spirit vs Letter)'' [[User:DMahalko|DMahalko]] ([[User talk:DMahalko|talk]]) 18:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276353 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276352 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.223432220E09 +++$+++ Hmm, nice lack of AGF on your part... No, my primary intent here is to dissuade you from attempting to write further about a subject which you yourself have stated you understand only poorly; it will only cause knowledgeable people to have to do more work to clean things up after you.  I realize that when you have written about something it is difficult to accept deletion. But really, the only factually correct alternative would have been to invert it so that it said pretty much the opposite of what you were claiming: \"Despite appearances, the limit of around 3 GB RAM seen on some Windows operating systems is not related to the 640 KB \"conventional memory\" limit, as it is not an architectural limit of the hardware or the software.\" And if you put your text back, that's pretty much what I'll have to do to it.   +++$+++ ::::::: Hmm, nice lack of AGF on your part... No, my primary intent here is to dissuade you from attempting to write further about a subject which you yourself have stated you understand only poorly; it will only cause knowledgeable people to have to do more work to clean things up after you.  I realize that when you have written about something it is difficult to accept deletion. But really, the only factually correct alternative would have been to invert it so that it said pretty much the opposite of what you were claiming: "Despite appearances, the limit of around 3 GB RAM seen on some Windows operating systems is not related to the 640 KB "conventional memory" limit, as it is not an architectural limit of the hardware or the software." And if you put your text back, that's pretty much what I'll have to do to it.  [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 19:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276354 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276352 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.223432220E09 +++$+++ That \"nothing better was available\" does not mean that any old text was acceptable, despite its making many erroneous claims; nor is it necessary to retain \"that which is not so\" because of AGF.  The fact that \"that which is not so\" was written with good intentions doesn't mean that it, or any edited form, has to be or should be retained.  +++$+++ ::::::: That "nothing better was available" does not mean that any old text was acceptable, despite its making many erroneous claims; nor is it necessary to retain "that which is not so" because of AGF.  The fact that "that which is not so" was written with good intentions doesn't mean that it, or any edited form, has to be or should be retained. [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 19:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276355 +++$+++ DMahalko +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276346 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.223429280E09 +++$+++ It appears you (and Warren) just don't get it so I am done with this discussion, but I'm not done with that article.  +++$+++ :::::: It appears you (and Warren) just don't get it so I am done with this discussion, but I'm not done with that article. [[User:DMahalko|DMahalko]] ([[User talk:DMahalko|talk]]) 18:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276356 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276355 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.223432220E09 +++$+++ I'm not done with correcting, or deleting completely, that-which-is-not-so either.  +++$+++ ::::::: I'm not done with correcting, or deleting completely, that-which-is-not-so either. [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 19:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276357 +++$+++ DMahalko +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276341 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.223386140E09 +++$+++ If you're going to wave linux as an excuse to not discuss the modern 32-bit memory limitations, note that various early versions of linux did not suffer from the conventional memory limit either (oh dear another analogy, I realize you hate these) so we can probably delete this whole article in that case.  +++$+++ :::: If you're going to wave linux as an excuse to not discuss the modern 32-bit memory limitations, note that various early versions of linux did not suffer from the conventional memory limit either (oh dear another analogy, I realize you hate these) so we can probably delete this whole article in that case. [[User:DMahalko|DMahalko]] ([[User talk:DMahalko|talk]]) 06:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
276358 +++$+++ Jeh +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276337 +++$+++ 276357 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.223388840E09 +++$+++ No, I \"waved Linux\" to show that the \"barrier\" you wrote about is not universal to 32-bit operating systems and so does not require 64-bit hardware to get past. Again you attempt to counter arguments that were not made in the first place. Again, as Warren suggested, if  you want to write about the PCI hole, please do so; then you could put a link to that article as a \"see also\" under \"conventional memory\".  +++$+++ ::::: No, I "waved Linux" to show that the "barrier" you wrote about is not universal to 32-bit operating systems and so does not require 64-bit hardware to get past. Again you attempt to counter arguments that were not made in the first place. Again, as Warren suggested, if  you want to write about the PCI hole, please do so; then you could put a link to that article as a "see also" under "conventional memory". [[User:Jeh|Jeh]] ([[User talk:Jeh|talk]]) 07:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

14197 +++$+++ KP Botany +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14197 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-08 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.186620480E09 +++$+++ Nice job on all the Elm cultivar pages.  If you do this many page moves in the future, ask if you can get a bot to do it for you.  Generally don't abbreviate words like \"Herb.\" for Herbarium in articles, although I didn't check, just saw this in one article--they're well written, informative, interesting.  Do you have a list of Elm cultivars?  Nice job.   +++$+++ Nice job on all the Elm cultivar pages.  If you do this many page moves in the future, ask if you can get a bot to do it for you.  Generally don't abbreviate words like "Herb." for Herbarium in articles, although I didn't check, just saw this in one article--they're well written, informative, interesting.  Do you have a list of Elm cultivars?  Nice job.  [[User:KP Botany|KP Botany]] 17:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
14198 +++$+++ KP Botany +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14197 +++$+++ 14197 +++$+++ 2007-08-08 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.186621500E09 +++$+++ I prodded the redirect from [[Ulmus rubra|Ulmus rubra - Slippery Elm]], as there is no need to have this as a redirect page.   +++$+++ :I prodded the redirect from [[Ulmus rubra|Ulmus rubra - Slippery Elm]], as there is no need to have this as a redirect page.  [[User:KP Botany|KP Botany]] 18:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
14199 +++$+++ KP Botany +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14197 +++$+++ 14198 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.186701840E09 +++$+++ Yes, wiki plants agreed we'd use scientific names for all but a few major agricultural crops (apple), but we have not changed all of the articles to scientific names, and it's very confusing for other editors to figure out what, if any protocol, there is.  Considering the apparent lack of convention among other plant editors, I really shouldn't have said \"strange\" about your title choice, when a simple clue from other editors working on plants is not really forthcoming.  And, yes, although I found the one abbreviation in an article, I didn't look at other articles to see if that was occurring, because I assumed it was not a problem due to the one article I looked at being generally well written in Standard English.  I did see that you have a list on Wikipedia of Elm cultivars, which was what I was asking about.  Again, very nice.   +++$+++ ::Yes, wiki plants agreed we'd use scientific names for all but a few major agricultural crops (apple), but we have not changed all of the articles to scientific names, and it's very confusing for other editors to figure out what, if any protocol, there is.  Considering the apparent lack of convention among other plant editors, I really shouldn't have said "strange" about your title choice, when a simple clue from other editors working on plants is not really forthcoming.  And, yes, although I found the one abbreviation in an article, I didn't look at other articles to see if that was occurring, because I assumed it was not a problem due to the one article I looked at being generally well written in Standard English.  I did see that you have a list on Wikipedia of Elm cultivars, which was what I was asking about.  Again, very nice.  [[User:KP Botany|KP Botany]] 16:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

14200 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14200 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-28 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.196316060E09 +++$+++ Hi there, the above article is under review and one of the things which has been called into question is the provenance of the image [[:Image:HMS Triumph picket boat.jpg]]. Can you provide any more information about this image and if it is not clearly in the public domain can you give a fiar use rationale? Regards-- +++$+++ Hi there, the above article is under review and one of the things which has been called into question is the provenance of the image [[:Image:HMS Triumph picket boat.jpg]]. Can you provide any more information about this image and if it is not clearly in the public domain can you give a fiar use rationale? Regards--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 22:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
14201 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14200 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-29 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.196384820E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, I have changed the tag to a better one.-- +++$+++ ::Don't worry, I have changed the tag to a better one.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 17:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

14203 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-16 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.213649580E09 +++$+++ As you have gently corrected some of my wayward novice Wiki efforts in the past, I wonder if I could solicit your help in correcting the titles of 7 elm pages, which either exclusively feature the common name of the tree, or both common and scientific, in contravention of WP:Plants protocol. I've tried moving them myself but on each occasion have been directed to seek the help of an Administrator. The titles are (should be) as follows: Wych Elm (Ulmus glabra), Field Elm (Ulmus minor), Chestnut-leafed Elm (Ulmus castaneifolia), U. bergmanniana - Bergmann's Elm (Ulmus bergmanniana), U. laciniata - Manchurian Elm (Ulmus laciniata), U. macrocarpa - Large-fruited Elm (Ulmus laciniata), and finally (U. uyematsui - Arishan Elm (Ulmus uyematsui). Regards,  +++$+++ As you have gently corrected some of my wayward novice Wiki efforts in the past, I wonder if I could solicit your help in correcting the titles of 7 elm pages, which either exclusively feature the common name of the tree, or both common and scientific, in contravention of WP:Plants protocol. I've tried moving them myself but on each occasion have been directed to seek the help of an Administrator. The titles are (should be) as follows: Wych Elm (Ulmus glabra), Field Elm (Ulmus minor), Chestnut-leafed Elm (Ulmus castaneifolia), U. bergmanniana - Bergmann's Elm (Ulmus bergmanniana), U. laciniata - Manchurian Elm (Ulmus laciniata), U. macrocarpa - Large-fruited Elm (Ulmus laciniata), and finally (U. uyematsui - Arishan Elm (Ulmus uyematsui). Regards, [[User:Ptelea|Ptelea]] ([[User talk:Ptelea|talk]]) 13:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
14204 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14203 +++$+++ 14203 +++$+++ 2008-06-21 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.214044620E09 +++$+++ Done. Sorry it took me a while to respond. I've been struggling against a backlog of plant articles to assess. Hope all is well! Cheers,  +++$+++ :Done. Sorry it took me a while to respond. I've been struggling against a backlog of plant articles to assess. Hope all is well! Cheers, [[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 03:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

14205 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-30 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.214835300E09 +++$+++ Dear Ptelea, <br> <br>Thanks for your message.  As I understand it, RMS was a prefix given to a ship when employed carrying the mails; it came and went with the job (see [[Royal Mail Ship]]).  [[Twin screw steamer|TSS]] was a fairly short-lived prefix standing for 'Twin Screw Steamer', when such a thing was new.  SS seems to be a more enduring naming culture.  <br><br> As for the picture, you gave me a little concern at first!  The description in the text came from [[T.S.S. California]], and talks about two funnels, but the picture beneath the infobox seems to show just one.  In fact, if you look closely at the latter picture, you can see the top of the forward funnel just to the right of flag sierra (the fourth flag from the bottom of the dressing line).  I think the single stacker on other sites may be the [[SS California (1902)]] or [[SS California (1872)]] (the latter being run by the Anchor Line as well).  <br><br>The ''California'' of the famous strike was a quite different ship, being built in the US in 1928 at Newport News Shipbuilders - see [[SS California (1928)]].  Please have a look at the [[SS California]] disambiguation page, and see if it squares with your perception.  I would be interested to have a look at the other sites you are talking about - please add them to the '''References''' section of the appropriate page.  <br><br>Yours for now  +++$+++ Dear Ptelea, <br> <br>Thanks for your message.  As I understand it, RMS was a prefix given to a ship when employed carrying the mails; it came and went with the job (see [[Royal Mail Ship]]).  [[Twin screw steamer|TSS]] was a fairly short-lived prefix standing for 'Twin Screw Steamer', when such a thing was new.  SS seems to be a more enduring naming culture.  <br><br> As for the picture, you gave me a little concern at first!  The description in the text came from [[T.S.S. California]], and talks about two funnels, but the picture beneath the infobox seems to show just one.  In fact, if you look closely at the latter picture, you can see the top of the forward funnel just to the right of flag sierra (the fourth flag from the bottom of the dressing line).  I think the single stacker on other sites may be the [[SS California (1902)]] or [[SS California (1872)]] (the latter being run by the Anchor Line as well).  <br><br>The ''California'' of the famous strike was a quite different ship, being built in the US in 1928 at Newport News Shipbuilders - see [[SS California (1928)]].  Please have a look at the [[SS California]] disambiguation page, and see if it squares with your perception.  I would be interested to have a look at the other sites you are talking about - please add them to the '''References''' section of the appropriate page.  <br><br>Yours for now [[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 07:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
14206 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14205 +++$+++ 14205 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.215107220E09 +++$+++ Dear Shem <br> Regret the Anchor Line webpage for the California (1923) [http:\/\/www.theshipslist.com\/pictures\/california.htm] shows a single- stacker. But in other details, it would appear to be the same ship, so clearly a major makeover at some stage. Looked to other Wiki pages for examples of tonnage \/ displacement. The compilers of the liners Queen Elizabeth and Queen Mary pages enter almost identical figures for both. The more enlightened authors of the QE2 page however seem to appreciate the distinction and give a tonnage substantially greater than the displacement. I'm obviously no expert in this field, and only got involved with the California as original author of the HMS Swale page, my late grandfather having served on her throughout WW2 (see also HM sub G9). Regards,  +++$+++ :Dear Shem <br> Regret the Anchor Line webpage for the California (1923) [http://www.theshipslist.com/pictures/california.htm] shows a single- stacker. But in other details, it would appear to be the same ship, so clearly a major makeover at some stage. Looked to other Wiki pages for examples of tonnage / displacement. The compilers of the liners Queen Elizabeth and Queen Mary pages enter almost identical figures for both. The more enlightened authors of the QE2 page however seem to appreciate the distinction and give a tonnage substantially greater than the displacement. I'm obviously no expert in this field, and only got involved with the California as original author of the HMS Swale page, my late grandfather having served on her throughout WW2 (see also HM sub G9). Regards, [[User:Ptelea|Ptelea]] ([[User talk:Ptelea|talk]]) 10:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
14207 +++$+++ Shem1805 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14205 +++$+++ 14206 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.215123600E09 +++$+++ Dear Ptelea<br>My apologies - I thought we were talking about [[SS California (1907)]] being a single stacker.  The photo at the Anchor Line webpage is very interesting - certainly the same ship, but UGLY! If you look at the photo on the wiki page, smoke is only coming from the middle funnel - could the other two be purely cosmetic?  My area of expertise is really Naval units, hence my preference for the verifiable source than anything that sounds like Original Research.  I know from my own experience that tonnage figures vary wildly for ships (Net, Gross, Suez, etc, etc).  Great article on ''Swale'', by the way. Thanks for your help, and Viva Wikipedia! <br> +++$+++ ::Dear Ptelea<br>My apologies - I thought we were talking about [[SS California (1907)]] being a single stacker.  The photo at the Anchor Line webpage is very interesting - certainly the same ship, but UGLY! If you look at the photo on the wiki page, smoke is only coming from the middle funnel - could the other two be purely cosmetic?  My area of expertise is really Naval units, hence my preference for the verifiable source than anything that sounds like Original Research.  I know from my own experience that tonnage figures vary wildly for ships (Net, Gross, Suez, etc, etc).  Great article on ''Swale'', by the way. Thanks for your help, and Viva Wikipedia! <br>[[User:Shem1805|Shem]] ([[User talk:Shem1805|talk]]) 15:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

556798 +++$+++ W. B. Wilson +++$+++ Buckshot06 +++$+++ 556798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-15 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.200445200E09 +++$+++ Buckshot06, I'd like to invite your attention to two eastern front articles [[Battle of Narva - Battle for the Narva Bridgehead (1944)]] and [[Battle of Narva - Battle of the Tannenberg Line (1944)]].  While they contain a wealth of information, I'd honestly have to rate their historical worth as awful. Both read more like memoirs of German (particularly SS) commanders than encyclopedic accounts of military actions.  Laughably, they both claim the battle results as \"tactical German victories\".  Since when did \"tactical victory\" come to mean that the \"winning\" side got defeated and pushed back hundreds of kilometers?<br><br>These should probably be rewritten at some point to offer a more balanced POV; as it is, they are nothing more than barely disguised cheerleading for the SS. I'm wondering if I'm overreacting to them and would like to know your take on them. Thanks-- +++$+++ Buckshot06, I'd like to invite your attention to two eastern front articles [[Battle of Narva - Battle for the Narva Bridgehead (1944)]] and [[Battle of Narva - Battle of the Tannenberg Line (1944)]].  While they contain a wealth of information, I'd honestly have to rate their historical worth as awful. Both read more like memoirs of German (particularly SS) commanders than encyclopedic accounts of military actions.  Laughably, they both claim the battle results as "tactical German victories".  Since when did "tactical victory" come to mean that the "winning" side got defeated and pushed back hundreds of kilometers?<br><br>These should probably be rewritten at some point to offer a more balanced POV; as it is, they are nothing more than barely disguised cheerleading for the SS. I'm wondering if I'm overreacting to them and would like to know your take on them. Thanks--[[User:W. B. Wilson|W. B. Wilson]] ([[User talk:W. B. Wilson|talk]]) 17:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
556799 +++$+++ W. B. Wilson +++$+++ Buckshot06 +++$+++ 556798 +++$+++ 556798 +++$+++ 2008-01-16 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.200489120E09 +++$+++ I'll see what can I dig up on 1st Red Banner Army.  Cheers-- +++$+++ :I'll see what can I dig up on 1st Red Banner Army.  Cheers--[[User:W. B. Wilson|W. B. Wilson]] ([[User talk:W. B. Wilson|talk]]) 05:12, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
556800 +++$+++ W. B. Wilson +++$+++ Buckshot06 +++$+++ 556798 +++$+++ 556799 +++$+++ 2008-01-18 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.200660480E09 +++$+++ Re the Narva Bridgehead.  I have some more to add, just have to wade through official histories to get a better overall understanding of what was going on.  Thanks-- +++$+++ ::Re the Narva Bridgehead.  I have some more to add, just have to wade through official histories to get a better overall understanding of what was going on.  Thanks--[[User:W. B. Wilson|W. B. Wilson]] ([[User talk:W. B. Wilson|talk]]) 04:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

538498 +++$+++ Rocketmaniac +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-20 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.203507420E09 +++$+++ Hello, Yes I was\/am trying to add the statistics section to most 2008 team articles. Even though it's 7 months away, there are lots of articles to get ready for the 2008-2009 season. I was not aware that some teams don't use statistics. Is this a problem?  +++$+++ Hello, Yes I was/am trying to add the statistics section to most 2008 team articles. Even though it's 7 months away, there are lots of articles to get ready for the 2008-2009 season. I was not aware that some teams don't use statistics. Is this a problem? [[User:Rocketmaniac|<font face="Verdana" color="4169E1">'''Rocket'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Rocketmaniac|<font color="9400D3">'''maniac'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Rocketmaniac|<font face="Serif" color="4169E1">''RT''</font>]]</sup> 03:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
538499 +++$+++ Rocketmaniac +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538498 +++$+++ 538498 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.203509640E09 +++$+++ I am just trying to get ready for the 2008-2009 season. I was under the impression that these were just standard statistics that could be found on websites such as yahoo sports, espn.com etc and therefore used on all articles. Which teams (articles) do you think are not going to use these statistics? I have no desire to do a ton of work that will just be deleted, but at the same time I have no problem doing work that will benefit Wikipedia. Please give me your thoughts.  +++$+++ :I am just trying to get ready for the 2008-2009 season. I was under the impression that these were just standard statistics that could be found on websites such as yahoo sports, espn.com etc and therefore used on all articles. Which teams (articles) do you think are not going to use these statistics? I have no desire to do a ton of work that will just be deleted, but at the same time I have no problem doing work that will benefit Wikipedia. Please give me your thoughts. [[User:Rocketmaniac|<font face="Verdana" color="4169E1">'''Rocket'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Rocketmaniac|<font color="9400D3">'''maniac'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Rocketmaniac|<font face="Serif" color="4169E1">''RT''</font>]]</sup> 04:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
538500 +++$+++ SatyrTN +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538498 +++$+++ 538499 +++$+++ 2008-02-22 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.203678600E09 +++$+++ Let me know if you have any questions or if it doesn't update next week.  Thanks - and sorry for the delay!!! -- <span style=\"background: #EECCFF;\"> +++$+++ ::Let me know if you have any questions or if it doesn't update next week.  Thanks - and sorry for the delay!!! -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">[[User:SatyrTN|SatyrTN]] <small>([[User talk:SatyrTN|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/SatyrTN|contribs]])</small></span> 03:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

14215 +++$+++ Dick Bos +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-02 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.230904740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dick Bos|Dick Bos]] ([[User talk:Dick Bos|talk]]) 05:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
14216 +++$+++ Dick Bos +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14215 +++$+++ 14215 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.231417680E09 +++$+++ I was just wondering if you know Paul (Wynen) (Eastwoodhill)? -  +++$+++ :I was just wondering if you know Paul (Wynen) (Eastwoodhill)? - [[User:Dick Bos|Dick Bos]] ([[User talk:Dick Bos|talk]]) 04:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

14217 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-12 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.231811280E09 +++$+++ Puzzled by action by Kingturtle, who decided on 30 Nov 2008 to move the page of a cultivar, [[Ulmus parvifolia 'Frosty']] to the main page for [[Ulmus parvifolia]], for reasons best known to himself. Regret I appear to have made things worse by recklessly reverting the page to 'Frosty', and finding myself unable to retrieve the original U. parvifolia page. Should have sought your help first of course. If not too late, your assistance once more greatly appreciated. Regards,  +++$+++ Puzzled by action by Kingturtle, who decided on 30 Nov 2008 to move the page of a cultivar, [[Ulmus parvifolia 'Frosty']] to the main page for [[Ulmus parvifolia]], for reasons best known to himself. Regret I appear to have made things worse by recklessly reverting the page to 'Frosty', and finding myself unable to retrieve the original U. parvifolia page. Should have sought your help first of course. If not too late, your assistance once more greatly appreciated. Regards, [[User:Ptelea|Ptelea]] ([[User talk:Ptelea|talk]]) 17:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
14218 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14217 +++$+++ 14217 +++$+++ 2009-01-12 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.231824540E09 +++$+++ That is a puzzling move. I've restored the articles as they were and will inquire with Kingturtle as to the motive. Cheers,  +++$+++ :That is a puzzling move. I've restored the articles as they were and will inquire with Kingturtle as to the motive. Cheers, [[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 21:29, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

594048 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hamster Sandwich +++$+++ 594048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-25 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.259147940E09 +++$+++ Hi since you indicated interest in my RfA, I'd like to point out that I have requested an editor review. If you don't want to review me for any reason, that's okay :). But if you would, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks! --<font color=red> +++$+++ Hi since you indicated interest in my RfA, I'd like to point out that I have requested an editor review. If you don't want to review me for any reason, that's okay :). But if you would, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks! --<font color=red>[[User:Addihockey10|Addi]]</font><font color=blue>[[User talk:Addihockey10|hockey]]</font><font color=gold>[[Special:Contributions/Addihockey10|10]]</font><sup><font color=purple>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Addihockey10|(review me!)]]</font></sup> 03:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
594049 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hamster Sandwich +++$+++ 594048 +++$+++ 594048 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.259463120E09 +++$+++ Hey again! Thanks for the review! Other than writing an article which I plan to do today; is there anything else you would like to have me do before requesting adminship? Once again; thanks! --<b><font color=red> +++$+++ :Hey again! Thanks for the review! Other than writing an article which I plan to do today; is there anything else you would like to have me do before requesting adminship? Once again; thanks! --<b><font color=red>[[User:Addihockey10|Addi]]</font><font color=blue>[[User talk:Addihockey10|hockey]]</font><font color=gold>[[Special:Contributions/Addihockey10|10]]</font><sup><font color=purple>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Addihockey10|(review me!)]]</font></sup></b> 18:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

14219 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-29 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.241046300E09 +++$+++ [[:File:DSCN0816East Coker.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Ulmus minor subsp minor.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Ulmus minor subsp minor.jpg]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:File:DSCN0816East Coker.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Ulmus minor subsp minor.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Ulmus minor subsp minor.jpg]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 16:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
14220 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14219 +++$+++ 14219 +++$+++ 2009-04-29 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.241046540E09 +++$+++ [[:File:DSCN0811East Coker.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Ulmus minor tree.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:DSCN0811East Coker.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Ulmus minor tree.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 16:09, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
14221 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14219 +++$+++ 14219 +++$+++ 2009-04-30 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.241123280E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Lutece GFF 2008.JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Ulmus Nanguen 2.JPG]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Lutece GFF 2008.JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Ulmus Nanguen 2.JPG]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 13:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

148867 +++$+++ WVhybrid +++$+++ Sdsds +++$+++ 148867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-20 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.232452680E09 +++$+++ Thanks, +++$+++ Thanks,[[User:WVhybrid|WVhybrid]] ([[User talk:WVhybrid|talk]]) 03:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
148868 +++$+++ Sdsds +++$+++ Sdsds +++$+++ 148867 +++$+++ 148867 +++$+++ 2009-01-20 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.232473740E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you find the userbox is useful! As regards the spacewalk lists -- I pretty much agree with the opinion you expressed on the article talk page, i.e. other efforts (like getting to featured-list quality) are probably better uses of time\/energy. Indeed, using the template mechanism to generate sub-lists based on selectors may always be \"too complex\" for any real uses. ( +++$+++ :I'm glad you find the userbox is useful! As regards the spacewalk lists -- I pretty much agree with the opinion you expressed on the article talk page, i.e. other efforts (like getting to featured-list quality) are probably better uses of time/energy. Indeed, using the template mechanism to generate sub-lists based on selectors may always be "too complex" for any real uses. ([[User:Sdsds|sdsds]] - ''[[User talk:Sdsds|talk]]'') 09:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

14224 +++$+++ Rodw +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-20 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.242856200E09 +++$+++ I have reverted your edit to the order of sections on the article about [[East Coker]] in line with the guidelines at [[WP:UKCITIES]] which, although not mandatory, are designed to achieve consistency across the thousands of articles about UK parishes, villages etc. I also note you marked the change as minor when I would not consider it to be minor, and would appreciate if you could give and edit summary briefly describing the change you've made. If you feel my reversion was inappropriate, perhaps we could discuss it on the [[Talk:East Coker|talk page]].&mdash;  +++$+++ I have reverted your edit to the order of sections on the article about [[East Coker]] in line with the guidelines at [[WP:UKCITIES]] which, although not mandatory, are designed to achieve consistency across the thousands of articles about UK parishes, villages etc. I also note you marked the change as minor when I would not consider it to be minor, and would appreciate if you could give and edit summary briefly describing the change you've made. If you feel my reversion was inappropriate, perhaps we could discuss it on the [[Talk:East Coker|talk page]].&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 14:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
14225 +++$+++ Rodw +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14224 +++$+++ 14224 +++$+++ 2009-05-21 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.242939000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments. As the points you make seem to be general ones related to the guidelines at [[WP:UKCITIES]] and their appropriateness (or otherwise) perhaps you could suggest changes at the associated talk page, or the more widely monitored talk page at [[WP:UKGEO]]. Thanks&mdash;  +++$+++ :Thanks for your comments. As the points you make seem to be general ones related to the guidelines at [[WP:UKCITIES]] and their appropriateness (or otherwise) perhaps you could suggest changes at the associated talk page, or the more widely monitored talk page at [[WP:UKGEO]]. Thanks&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 13:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

276370 +++$+++ Chris 42 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-03 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.225748880E09 +++$+++ With regard to the ''[[Top Gear (current format)|Top Gear]]'' article, \"censure\" means \"express strong disapproval of\". Are you sure you're not confusing it with \"censor\"? The word \"criticism\" already appears within the paragraph and it's not good writing style to repeat words (or variants of them) where it can be avoided. :-)  +++$+++ With regard to the ''[[Top Gear (current format)|Top Gear]]'' article, "censure" means "express strong disapproval of". Are you sure you're not confusing it with "censor"? The word "criticism" already appears within the paragraph and it's not good writing style to repeat words (or variants of them) where it can be avoided. :-) [[User:Chris 42|Chris 42]] ([[User talk:Chris 42|talk]]) 13:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
276371 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276370 +++$+++ 276370 +++$+++ 2008-11-03 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.225780260E09 +++$+++ [[Censure]] means something more specific than that -- censuring someone is a ''formal'' expression of disapproval, by way of a press release or official statement from an authoritative body; government, judicial, and so on.  Top Gear has received plenty of criticism, but what have they been ''censured'' for?  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : [[Censure]] means something more specific than that -- censuring someone is a ''formal'' expression of disapproval, by way of a press release or official statement from an authoritative body; government, judicial, and so on.  Top Gear has received plenty of criticism, but what have they been ''censured'' for?  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 22:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

276372 +++$+++ Chris 42 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276372 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-03 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.225780980E09 +++$+++ The [http:\/\/www.askoxford.com:80\/concise_oed\/censure?view=uk Oxford English Dictionary definition] makes no reference to it having to be official. However, since as I said before, \"criticism\" has already been used in the paragraph I have changed the sentence to reflect the text stated in the source.  +++$+++ The [http://www.askoxford.com:80/concise_oed/censure?view=uk Oxford English Dictionary definition] makes no reference to it having to be official. However, since as I said before, "criticism" has already been used in the paragraph I have changed the sentence to reflect the text stated in the source. [[User:Chris 42|Chris 42]] ([[User talk:Chris 42|talk]]) 22:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
276373 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276372 +++$+++ 276372 +++$+++ 2008-11-03 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.225781280E09 +++$+++ The OED may not, but [http:\/\/dictionary.reference.com\/browse\/censure most other dictionaries do].  Wikipedia and Wiktionary follow this premise, too.  Also, it is generally more common for Wikipedia to use the word \"criticise\" than \"censure\" for this sort of thing.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : The OED may not, but [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/censure most other dictionaries do].  Wikipedia and Wiktionary follow this premise, too.  Also, it is generally more common for Wikipedia to use the word "criticise" than "censure" for this sort of thing.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 22:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

276374 +++$+++ Ahunt +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-04 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.225833840E09 +++$+++ -  +++$+++ - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 13:24, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
276375 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276374 +++$+++ 276374 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.225842300E09 +++$+++ Look.  Mary Jo Foley still isn't a software developer; she's a journalist that clearly doesn't understand what code refactoring is.  You can't \"turn off\" MinWin because it -is- the core of Windows, as it has evolved over a single path of progression in the last five years.  That she continues to fail to understand this is baffling.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Look.  Mary Jo Foley still isn't a software developer; she's a journalist that clearly doesn't understand what code refactoring is.  You can't "turn off" MinWin because it -is- the core of Windows, as it has evolved over a single path of progression in the last five years.  That she continues to fail to understand this is baffling.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 15:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

482969 +++$+++ DanMS +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-21 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.185073200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for being the voice of reason on my recent [[WP:ANI#Can_someone_talk_to_Dan_MS_please|ANI thread]]. Despite all the fuss, it is still not clear to me what I did wrong. Could you enlighten me? I am a relatively new admin and I don\u2019t know all the policies yet, but I am trying to learn. Thanks. &#9679; +++$+++ Thanks for being the voice of reason on my recent [[WP:ANI#Can_someone_talk_to_Dan_MS_please|ANI thread]]. Despite all the fuss, it is still not clear to me what I did wrong. Could you enlighten me? I am a relatively new admin and I don’t know all the policies yet, but I am trying to learn. Thanks. &#9679;[[User:DanMS|DanMS]] • [[User talk:DanMS|Talk]] 20:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
482970 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482969 +++$+++ 482969 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.185075540E09 +++$+++ Basically what you did was a copy and paste move.  When someone does that, the entire history of the article is lost and that is a bad thing.  In [[WP:DRV]] cases like that, instead of just copying the deleted text, you should do a restore of the deleted article (see [[Wikipedia:Viewing and restoring deleted pages by sysops]]), move the article to the requesting user's subpage location, and then delete the resulting redirect (per [[WP:CSD#R2]]).  Then, if the requesting user turns the article into something salvageable, they can move it back to the original location and the article's entire history will be kept intact.  It was an honest mistake.  My assumption is that the person complaining was just trying to make a point of some kind.  Let me know if you have any other questions about this or anything else.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Basically what you did was a copy and paste move.  When someone does that, the entire history of the article is lost and that is a bad thing.  In [[WP:DRV]] cases like that, instead of just copying the deleted text, you should do a restore of the deleted article (see [[Wikipedia:Viewing and restoring deleted pages by sysops]]), move the article to the requesting user's subpage location, and then delete the resulting redirect (per [[WP:CSD#R2]]).  Then, if the requesting user turns the article into something salvageable, they can move it back to the original location and the article's entire history will be kept intact.  It was an honest mistake.  My assumption is that the person complaining was just trying to make a point of some kind.  Let me know if you have any other questions about this or anything else.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 20:39, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
482971 +++$+++ DanMS +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482969 +++$+++ 482970 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.185078660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the response and clear directions. Should the situation arise again, I will (1) Restore, (2) Move, (3) Delete as you explained above. I know about the prohibition on cut-and-paste moves, but I did not realize that would apply in this type of situation. I thought that since the user simply wanted to see the text of the article, I could just copy it into his user space. But I see the point now: If he re-creates the article from the deleted text, then the history of that original text is lost. One more question: When restoring the article prior to moving it to user space, do I restore ''all'' deleted revisions of the article (standard restore)? &#9679; +++$+++ :*Thanks for the response and clear directions. Should the situation arise again, I will (1) Restore, (2) Move, (3) Delete as you explained above. I know about the prohibition on cut-and-paste moves, but I did not realize that would apply in this type of situation. I thought that since the user simply wanted to see the text of the article, I could just copy it into his user space. But I see the point now: If he re-creates the article from the deleted text, then the history of that original text is lost. One more question: When restoring the article prior to moving it to user space, do I restore ''all'' deleted revisions of the article (standard restore)? &#9679;[[User:DanMS|DanMS]] • [[User talk:DanMS|Talk]] 21:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
482972 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482969 +++$+++ 482971 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.185079020E09 +++$+++ :I would say yes, restore all revisions.  The only rare exception would be if the article had been deleted more than once.  Then I'd think you'd only restore revisions since the previous delete.  \u2014 +++$+++ :*:I would say yes, restore all revisions.  The only rare exception would be if the article had been deleted more than once.  Then I'd think you'd only restore revisions since the previous delete.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 21:37, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
482973 +++$+++ DanMS +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482969 +++$+++ 482972 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.185083820E09 +++$+++ This issue raises another interesting question, though. Suppose that the deleted article is posted to the user\u2019s sub-page. He edits and expands the original text to be a good article. Then, rather than ''moving'' his sub-page to the main wiki, he ''creates'' a new page in the main wiki and ''copies'' the text from his user page to the new article with a slightly different title. In that case the copied text would have no history. If he re-creates the ''same title'', then the history would still exist as \u201cdeleted edits\u201d, but if he creates a page with a ''different title'', then there would be no history. &#9679; +++$+++ :::*This issue raises another interesting question, though. Suppose that the deleted article is posted to the user’s sub-page. He edits and expands the original text to be a good article. Then, rather than ''moving'' his sub-page to the main wiki, he ''creates'' a new page in the main wiki and ''copies'' the text from his user page to the new article with a slightly different title. In that case the copied text would have no history. If he re-creates the ''same title'', then the history would still exist as “deleted edits”, but if he creates a page with a ''different title'', then there would be no history. &#9679;[[User:DanMS|DanMS]] • [[User talk:DanMS|Talk]] 22:57, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
482974 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482969 +++$+++ 482973 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.185084420E09 +++$+++ :It's a valid point.  I was going to actually propose that except I think the GFDL requirements here even apply to user pages.  I guess look at it this way: if ''you'' copy-paste content without the history into a user page, then ''you'' are violating the terms of GFDL.  If you do things right but the requesting user copies the content back into the main space without the history then ''they'' are violating the terms of GFDL.  Save yourself!  :)  I suppose the best course of action is to keep track of times when you restore to people's user area and make sure it gets moved back properly if applicable. \u2014 +++$+++ :::*:It's a valid point.  I was going to actually propose that except I think the GFDL requirements here even apply to user pages.  I guess look at it this way: if ''you'' copy-paste content without the history into a user page, then ''you'' are violating the terms of GFDL.  If you do things right but the requesting user copies the content back into the main space without the history then ''they'' are violating the terms of GFDL.  Save yourself!  :)  I suppose the best course of action is to keep track of times when you restore to people's user area and make sure it gets moved back properly if applicable. —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 23:07, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

14232 +++$+++ Nadiatalent +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-17 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.266463320E09 +++$+++ Neat name to choose for your signon, too. I work on hawthorns and hadn't heard of the ancient tree at Saint Mars sur la Futaie. We hawthorn taxonomists would want to know if there is any chance it is a hybrid or one of the other species that are very difficult to tell apart from C. monogyna. Are you, by any chance, likely to be at the right spot at the right time to take a close-up photo of the flowers?  +++$+++ Neat name to choose for your signon, too. I work on hawthorns and hadn't heard of the ancient tree at Saint Mars sur la Futaie. We hawthorn taxonomists would want to know if there is any chance it is a hybrid or one of the other species that are very difficult to tell apart from C. monogyna. Are you, by any chance, likely to be at the right spot at the right time to take a close-up photo of the flowers? [[User:Nadiatalent|Nadiatalent]] ([[User talk:Nadiatalent|talk]]) 19:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
14233 +++$+++ Nadiatalent +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14232 +++$+++ 14232 +++$+++ 2010-02-18 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.266541740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the offer! I'll get in touch with our contact in Denmark to see if DNA work would be a good idea for this tree. +++$+++ :Thanks for the offer! I'll get in touch with our contact in Denmark to see if DNA work would be a good idea for this tree.[[User:Nadiatalent|Nadiatalent]] ([[User talk:Nadiatalent|talk]]) 17:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
14234 +++$+++ Nadiatalent +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14232 +++$+++ 14233 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.266720120E09 +++$+++ Could you get in touch with me at the email address on my user page? We'd love to get more information about this tree, and have some that you might be interested in.  +++$+++ ::Could you get in touch with me at the email address on my user page? We'd love to get more information about this tree, and have some that you might be interested in. [[User:Nadiatalent|Nadiatalent]] ([[User talk:Nadiatalent|talk]]) 18:42, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

276377 +++$+++ Frankrenehan +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-13 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.226644620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Frankrenehan|prunch]] ([[User talk:Frankrenehan|talk]]) 22:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
276378 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276377 +++$+++ 276377 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.226648340E09 +++$+++ Whether he was referring to the prostitute situation or not is a matter of opinion.  He didn't say it directly on the show.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Whether he was referring to the prostitute situation or not is a matter of opinion.  He didn't say it directly on the show.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 23:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

276379 +++$+++ Oli W 93 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276379 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-19 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.227147840E09 +++$+++ Why did you revert my edit? Even Microsoft is talking about a ''superbar'' and uses it as the working title. So even if its final title will be a different one this information should be mentioned. Don't you want the readers to get this information? -- +++$+++ Why did you revert my edit? Even Microsoft is talking about a ''superbar'' and uses it as the working title. So even if its final title will be a different one this information should be mentioned. Don't you want the readers to get this information? --[[User:Oli W 93|Oli]] ([[User talk:Oli W 93|talk]]) 18:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
276380 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276379 +++$+++ 276379 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.227269220E09 +++$+++ Simple answer -- you're wrong. Microsoft doesn't call it a Superbar in any of their presentations.  See the relevant talk page for the discussion... my talk page isn't the place to discuss article content.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Simple answer -- you're wrong. Microsoft doesn't call it a Superbar in any of their presentations.  See the relevant talk page for the discussion... my talk page isn't the place to discuss article content.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 04:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

538524 +++$+++  +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538524 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-01 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.228202520E09 +++$+++ I am having problems with your colege recruit template at [[2009\u201310 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team]].  How do I find the rivals IDs?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ I am having problems with your colege recruit template at [[2009–10 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team]].  How do I find the rivals IDs?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 23:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
538525 +++$+++  +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538524 +++$+++ 538524 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.228256580E09 +++$+++ Let me clarify my request. I am having trouble getting [[Template:College Athlete Recruit End]] to work at [[2009\u201310 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team]] and will be also trying to use it at [[2008-09 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team]] (The source code has been added, but hidden).  Can you provide some assistance.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :Let me clarify my request. I am having trouble getting [[Template:College Athlete Recruit End]] to work at [[2009–10 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team]] and will be also trying to use it at [[2008-09 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team]] (The source code has been added, but hidden).  Can you provide some assistance.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 14:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

14237 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-26 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.288079940E09 +++$+++ Ptelea, I am so sorry. I neglected to reply to your message at [[User talk:Rkitko#Problem with Elm pages]]. Is this still a problem? In the link you left, I couldn't see any edit link\/line interrupting the infobox. Under my screen resolution settings, the infobox is just above the dividing line. Regardless, the line should stop for object and certainly does for images. Do you think this is\/was a [[WP:BUNCH]] issue? Cheers,  +++$+++ Ptelea, I am so sorry. I neglected to reply to your message at [[User talk:Rkitko#Problem with Elm pages]]. Is this still a problem? In the link you left, I couldn't see any edit link/line interrupting the infobox. Under my screen resolution settings, the infobox is just above the dividing line. Regardless, the line should stop for object and certainly does for images. Do you think this is/was a [[WP:BUNCH]] issue? Cheers, [[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 00:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
14238 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14237 +++$+++ 14237 +++$+++ 2010-11-09 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.289336760E09 +++$+++ Hmm, if it's not a bunching issue, I'm not sure what it could be. Have you tried different browsers? All of the articles you've pointed me to appear fine to me with no errant lines. I've looked at the pages in Chrome, Firefox, and IE. Is it just on certain articles or does every article that starts with an infobox or photo on the right have the interrupting line? This is certainly puzzling.  +++$+++ :Hmm, if it's not a bunching issue, I'm not sure what it could be. Have you tried different browsers? All of the articles you've pointed me to appear fine to me with no errant lines. I've looked at the pages in Chrome, Firefox, and IE. Is it just on certain articles or does every article that starts with an infobox or photo on the right have the interrupting line? This is certainly puzzling. [[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 13:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

14239 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14239 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-07 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.289177160E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}<\/code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 16:46, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
14240 +++$+++ Rkitko +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14239 +++$+++ 14239 +++$+++ 2010-11-09 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.289336760E09 +++$+++ Ptelea, is it possible when you created this article, you were referring to the British botanist who collected in China named [[Henry Fletcher Hance]]?  +++$+++ :Ptelea, is it possible when you created this article, you were referring to the British botanist who collected in China named [[Henry Fletcher Hance]]? [[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 13:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

538528 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-06 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.231312980E09 +++$+++ You are a user who responded to [[RFC: Use of logos on sports team pages]]. As someone interested in the discussion a '''[[Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content\/RFC_on_use_of_sports_team_logos#Straw_poll_to_see_where_we_stand|new straw poll]]''' has been laid out to see where we currently stand with regards to building a consensus. For the sake of clarity, please indicate your support or opposition (or neutrality) to each section, but leave discussion to the end of each section. <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ You are a user who responded to [[RFC: Use of logos on sports team pages]]. As someone interested in the discussion a '''[[Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content/RFC_on_use_of_sports_team_logos#Straw_poll_to_see_where_we_stand|new straw poll]]''' has been laid out to see where we currently stand with regards to building a consensus. For the sake of clarity, please indicate your support or opposition (or neutrality) to each section, but leave discussion to the end of each section. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 23:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
538529 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538528 +++$+++ 538528 +++$+++ 2009-01-10 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.231578300E09 +++$+++ As a user who responded to the [[Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content\/RFC_on_use_of_sports_team_logos#Straw_poll_to_see_where_we_stand|straw poll regarding non-free images in sports]], your further input is requested with regards to the [[Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content\/RFC_on_use_of_sports_team_logos#Straw_Poll_Results|Straw poll summary]] and [[Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content\/RFC_on_use_of_sports_team_logos#So.2C_now_what.3F.21.3F|proposed guidelines on image use]] <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ :As a user who responded to the [[Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content/RFC_on_use_of_sports_team_logos#Straw_poll_to_see_where_we_stand|straw poll regarding non-free images in sports]], your further input is requested with regards to the [[Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content/RFC_on_use_of_sports_team_logos#Straw_Poll_Results|Straw poll summary]] and [[Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content/RFC_on_use_of_sports_team_logos#So.2C_now_what.3F.21.3F|proposed guidelines on image use]] <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 01:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

276386 +++$+++ Sotcr +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-25 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.227664740E09 +++$+++ In the \"Template:Infobox OS version\" the template \"OS cite needed\" does'nt work -- +++$+++ In the "Template:Infobox OS version" the template "OS cite needed" does'nt work --[[User:Sotcr|Sotcr]] ([[User talk:Sotcr|talk]]) 17:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
276387 +++$+++ Sotcr +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276386 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-28 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.227885000E09 +++$+++ Will you check this template?-- +++$+++ ::Will you check this template?--[[User:Sotcr|Sotcr]] ([[User talk:Sotcr|talk]]) 07:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

614043 +++$+++ Jpat34721 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-08 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.262938440E09 +++$+++ IMHO, the full quote should be restored uninterrupted as per your original proposal. The intervening \"of having a graph of paleoclimate reconstructions show measured real temperatures from 1981 onwards for two series of climate reconstructions, and from 1961 for a third series\", besides being unreadable, is OR and pretends WP ''knows'' what the \"trick\" refers to. Let's let Mann speak for himself.  +++$+++ IMHO, the full quote should be restored uninterrupted as per your original proposal. The intervening "of having a graph of paleoclimate reconstructions show measured real temperatures from 1981 onwards for two series of climate reconstructions, and from 1961 for a third series", besides being unreadable, is OR and pretends WP ''knows'' what the "trick" refers to. Let's let Mann speak for himself. [[User:Jpat34721|Jpat34721]] ([[User talk:Jpat34721|talk]]) 00:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
614044 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614043 +++$+++ 614043 +++$+++ 2010-01-08 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.262938860E09 +++$+++ The draft meets the problem of unidentified first names by presenting a sourced statement about who \"Mike\" is, and making it clear that it's Keith Briffa's reconstruction that was curtailed in accordance with Briffa's request that post 1960 curves should not be used. If that's addressed in the article, the whole quote can go in. It's still a bit abridged from the quote given by Jones in his first statement, but that's probably reasonable. .  +++$+++ :The draft meets the problem of unidentified first names by presenting a sourced statement about who "Mike" is, and making it clear that it's Keith Briffa's reconstruction that was curtailed in accordance with Briffa's request that post 1960 curves should not be used. If that's addressed in the article, the whole quote can go in. It's still a bit abridged from the quote given by Jones in his first statement, but that's probably reasonable. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 00:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

276388 +++$+++ Ricky81682 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-30 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.228052760E09 +++$+++ Warren, while I'm thankful for the support, comments like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Ramu50&diff=254928492&oldid=254926218 this] still shouldn't be done.  First, (and you know this) two wrongs don't make a right.  Second, by going to his level, he has won the argument and you have now encouraged him to continue.  Nothing is probably more aggravating to him than when nobody responds to his ranting or when people respond while ignoring him.  You have instead given him a source to continue onward.  Thanks anyways. --  +++$+++ Warren, while I'm thankful for the support, comments like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ramu50&diff=254928492&oldid=254926218 this] still shouldn't be done.  First, (and you know this) two wrongs don't make a right.  Second, by going to his level, he has won the argument and you have now encouraged him to continue.  Nothing is probably more aggravating to him than when nobody responds to his ranting or when people respond while ignoring him.  You have instead given him a source to continue onward.  Thanks anyways. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 05:46, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
276389 +++$+++ TenOfAllTrades +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276388 +++$+++ 276388 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.228124100E09 +++$+++ I came here to warn you about your comment to Ramu50, but I see Ricky81682 got to it first.  Your response ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Ricky81682&diff=254946910&oldid=254913389]) to Ricky's measured, polite advice was needlessly rude &mdash; and your intemperate response gives some insight into ''why'' a troll might find it amusing to torment you.  Ramu50's been indefinitely blocked; please just enjoy the peace and quiet rather than trying to get in a few kicks while he's down.   +++$+++ :I came here to warn you about your comment to Ramu50, but I see Ricky81682 got to it first.  Your response ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ricky81682&diff=254946910&oldid=254913389]) to Ricky's measured, polite advice was needlessly rude &mdash; and your intemperate response gives some insight into ''why'' a troll might find it amusing to torment you.  Ramu50's been indefinitely blocked; please just enjoy the peace and quiet rather than trying to get in a few kicks while he's down.  [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 01:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

276391 +++$+++ Mabdul +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276391 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-01 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.228158000E09 +++$+++ why not releasing it as a svg? --<small style=\"font:bold 12px Courier New;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap\"> +++$+++ why not releasing it as a svg? --<small style="font:bold 12px Courier New;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap">[[User:Mabdul|<font color="#000">mabdul</font>]] [[User talk:Mabdul|0=*]]</small> 11:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
276392 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276391 +++$+++ 276391 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.228158840E09 +++$+++ I was wondering if someone would ask this... :)  It's mainly because I don't have the tools or know-how to do it in SVG.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : I was wondering if someone would ask this... :)  It's mainly because I don't have the tools or know-how to do it in SVG.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 11:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
276393 +++$+++ Mabdul +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276391 +++$+++ 276392 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.228167000E09 +++$+++ oh :p maybe I will upload a converted image next week (I am lerning at  that moment how i works in applications...) --<small style=\"font:bold 12px Courier New;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap\"> +++$+++ :: oh :p maybe I will upload a converted image next week (I am lerning at  that moment how i works in applications...) --<small style="font:bold 12px Courier New;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap">[[User:Mabdul|<font color="#000">mabdul</font>]] [[User talk:Mabdul|0=*]]</small> 13:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

538537 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-23 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.243068780E09 +++$+++ Nmajdan - you should be able to ignore the request - as you know, adding |sex=women achieves the desired goal. I'll let Maple leaf know. +++$+++ Nmajdan - you should be able to ignore the request - as you know, adding |sex=women achieves the desired goal. I'll let Maple leaf know.[[User:Sphilbrick|Sphilbrick]] ([[User talk:Sphilbrick|talk]]) 01:53, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
538538 +++$+++ Ryan Postlethwaite +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538537 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-26 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.246008360E09 +++$+++ ''For the Mediation Committee,'' ''' +++$+++ ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' '''[[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|<font color="green">Ryan</font> <font color="purple">Postlethwaite</font>]]''' 02:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

14250 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311265260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ptelea|Ptelea]] ([[User talk:Ptelea#top|talk]]) 09:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
14251 +++$+++ Drilnoth +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14250 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311282780E09 +++$+++ How did he give you permission? Was it by email? Now I'm concerned that these may fall under [[WP:CSD#F11]]. \u2013 +++$+++ ::How did he give you permission? Was it by email? Now I'm concerned that these may fall under [[WP:CSD#F11]]. –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]]) 14:13, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
14252 +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14250 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.311283200E09 +++$+++ Yes, by email. Eric is both a colleague and close friend.  +++$+++ :::Yes, by email. Eric is both a colleague and close friend. [[User:Ptelea|Ptelea]] ([[User talk:Ptelea#top|talk]]) 14:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
14253 +++$+++ Drilnoth +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14250 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.311283380E09 +++$+++ Alright, great! If you haven't forwarded the email to Wikipedia permissions yet, could you follow the steps [[Wikipedia:COPYREQ#When permission is confirmed|here]]? We just need to confirm that proper permission for the use of the images has been given. Thanks! \u2013 +++$+++ ::::Alright, great! If you haven't forwarded the email to Wikipedia permissions yet, could you follow the steps [[Wikipedia:COPYREQ#When permission is confirmed|here]]? We just need to confirm that proper permission for the use of the images has been given. Thanks! –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]]) 14:23, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

276397 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-03 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.228354440E09 +++$+++ Re section \"The Cool Wall\" simply documenting what's been broadcast on the show ''is'' \"original research\" because it can't be verified any another editor's checking the source. On the other hand if you referenced particular sections of particular DVDs, in principle another editor who owns, rents or borrows the DVD(s) can check that the statements are supported by these. -- +++$+++ Re section "The Cool Wall" simply documenting what's been broadcast on the show ''is'' "original research" because it can't be verified any another editor's checking the source. On the other hand if you referenced particular sections of particular DVDs, in principle another editor who owns, rents or borrows the DVD(s) can check that the statements are supported by these. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 17:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
276398 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276397 +++$+++ 276397 +++$+++ 2008-12-03 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.228376700E09 +++$+++ Uhhhh.... what?  Please take a bit of time to more closely study the difference between lack of sourcing ([[WP:V]]), and the publishing of synthesis ([[WP:OR]]) before taking the time to lecture someone else on it.  '''The text doesn't advance a viewpoint or opinion''', therefore it is simply a sourcing problem.  That said, instead of simply complaining about the section, I'm going to take the time to improve it by tracking down some sources.  I'm sure you agree that that's the only way the encyclopedia improves. <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Uhhhh.... what?  Please take a bit of time to more closely study the difference between lack of sourcing ([[WP:V]]), and the publishing of synthesis ([[WP:OR]]) before taking the time to lecture someone else on it.  '''The text doesn't advance a viewpoint or opinion''', therefore it is simply a sourcing problem.  That said, instead of simply complaining about the section, I'm going to take the time to improve it by tracking down some sources.  I'm sure you agree that that's the only way the encyclopedia improves. <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 23:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
276399 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276397 +++$+++ 276398 +++$+++ 2008-12-04 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.228381680E09 +++$+++ Good hunting! -- +++$+++ ::Good hunting! --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 01:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

538542 +++$+++ RadioFan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-03 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.257292260E09 +++$+++ This looks like a page in development rather than one ready for the main article space, so I've moved it under your user space.  You may continue to develop it there and move it to the main space once it has been referenced and is generally ready for the main space.-- +++$+++ This looks like a page in development rather than one ready for the main article space, so I've moved it under your user space.  You may continue to develop it there and move it to the main space once it has been referenced and is generally ready for the main space.--[[User:RadioFan|RadioFan]] ([[User talk:RadioFan|talk]]) 15:51, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
538543 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538542 +++$+++ 538542 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.257294780E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Actually, after your move, I checked [[WP:SUBPAGE]] and it said it was ok for a development subpage to exist on the articles talk page, so I moved the page from my userspace to [[Talk:Oklahoma Sooners starting quarterbacks\/Dev]]. But thanks for pointing this out to me. I had a couple other dev spaces in article namespace that I have now moved to talk namespace.\u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks. Actually, after your move, I checked [[WP:SUBPAGE]] and it said it was ok for a development subpage to exist on the articles talk page, so I moved the page from my userspace to [[Talk:Oklahoma Sooners starting quarterbacks/Dev]]. But thanks for pointing this out to me. I had a couple other dev spaces in article namespace that I have now moved to talk namespace.—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 16:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

14255 +++$+++ Sven Manguard +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14255 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311422700E09 +++$+++ I see you uploaded a lot of images of the Ulmus americana that are credited to the R. Nijboer collection. If you are R. Nijboer (the full name was in one image), you probably should reword those descriptions as being your own work. If you are not R. Nijboer, please have him or someone who owns the photos send OTRS a quick email. Thanks.  +++$+++ I see you uploaded a lot of images of the Ulmus americana that are credited to the R. Nijboer collection. If you are R. Nijboer (the full name was in one image), you probably should reword those descriptions as being your own work. If you are not R. Nijboer, please have him or someone who owns the photos send OTRS a quick email. Thanks. [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 05:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
14256 +++$+++ Sven Manguard +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14255 +++$+++ 14255 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311422880E09 +++$+++ Oh, I was about to ask you about Eric Collin but I see that one above. Please make sure OTRS gets those emails. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Oh, I was about to ask you about Eric Collin but I see that one above. Please make sure OTRS gets those emails. Thanks, [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 05:08, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
14257 +++$+++ Sven Manguard +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14255 +++$+++ 14256 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311423000E09 +++$+++ And for M. Vincent Seigner too. And for anyone else that has donated images through you.  +++$+++ ::And for M. Vincent Seigner too. And for anyone else that has donated images through you. [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 05:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
14258 +++$+++ Adrignola +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14255 +++$+++ 14257 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311740760E09 +++$+++ I marked the Ronnie Nijboer images as [[WP:OTRS|OTRS]] confirmed.  Please follow the same procedure for the images mentioned above and any others I've marked as missing permission in [[Special:ListFiles\/Ptelea|your uploads]]. &ndash;&nbsp; +++$+++ :::I marked the Ronnie Nijboer images as [[WP:OTRS|OTRS]] confirmed.  Please follow the same procedure for the images mentioned above and any others I've marked as missing permission in [[Special:ListFiles/Ptelea|your uploads]]. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Adrignola|Adrignola]]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Adrignola|talk]]</small> 21:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
14259 +++$+++ Drilnoth +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14255 +++$+++ 14258 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.311744660E09 +++$+++ What images does the ticket cover? Just the ones from Nijboer, or are other names included? Thanks. \u2013 +++$+++ ::::What images does the ticket cover? Just the ones from Nijboer, or are other names included? Thanks. –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]]) 22:31, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
14260 +++$+++ Adrignola +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14255 +++$+++ 14259 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.311761880E09 +++$+++ Ticket is from Ronnie Nijboer, so it only covers his. &ndash;&nbsp; +++$+++ :::::Ticket is from Ronnie Nijboer, so it only covers his. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Adrignola|Adrignola]]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Adrignola|talk]]</small> 03:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14261 +++$+++ Drilnoth +++$+++ Ptelea +++$+++ 14255 +++$+++ 14260 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311802440E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks. \u2013 +++$+++ ::::::Okay, thanks. –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]]) 14:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

276401 +++$+++ Resplendent +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-09 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.228824180E09 +++$+++ I think the policy for what constitutes a Preview Release\/Version needs to be better articulated on the [[Template:Infobox OS version]] page in order to prevent such disagreements in the future.  Since it's your template, I think you should be the one to start the vote or procedure to determine the criteria, since you know the template best.  -- +++$+++ I think the policy for what constitutes a Preview Release/Version needs to be better articulated on the [[Template:Infobox OS version]] page in order to prevent such disagreements in the future.  Since it's your template, I think you should be the one to start the vote or procedure to determine the criteria, since you know the template best.  --[[User:Resplendent|Resplendent]] ([[User talk:Resplendent|talk]]) 04:03, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
276402 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276401 +++$+++ 276401 +++$+++ 2008-12-15 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.229336640E09 +++$+++ Perhaps I'm expecting too much when I hope that people will read the documentation for the template?  The documentation has said for, what, the better part of two years now? that the preview_version is meant for builds that are released by the company, not leaks or merely \"shown\" builds.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Perhaps I'm expecting too much when I hope that people will read the documentation for the template?  The documentation has said for, what, the better part of two years now? that the preview_version is meant for builds that are released by the company, not leaks or merely "shown" builds.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 02:24, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

276403 +++$+++ Sotcr +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276403 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-15 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.229338020E09 +++$+++ And I'm sorry for our disagreements  :)    Sotcr <span style=\"font-size: 60%;\" class=\"autosigned\">Excuse my English<\/span> ( +++$+++ And I'm sorry for our disagreements  :)    Sotcr <span style="font-size: 60%;" class="autosigned">Excuse my English</span> ([[User talk:Sotcr|talk me]]) 02:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
276404 +++$+++ Sotcr +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276403 +++$+++ 276403 +++$+++ 2008-12-15 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.229338380E09 +++$+++ And every time I re-edit is becouse i have new arguments, is not becouse i just want to do it --Sotcr <span style=\"font-size: 60%;\" class=\"autosigned\">Excuse my English<\/span> ( +++$+++ : And every time I re-edit is becouse i have new arguments, is not becouse i just want to do it --Sotcr <span style="font-size: 60%;" class="autosigned">Excuse my English</span> ([[User talk:Sotcr|talk me]]) 02:53, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
276405 +++$+++ Sotcr +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276403 +++$+++ 276404 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.229510820E09 +++$+++ Please check the talk page, I'm not who is changing every time the article, but i'm discussing about it and you just dont see it or ignore it --Sotcr <span style=\"font-size: 60%;\" class=\"autosigned\">Excuse my English<\/span> ( +++$+++ :: Please check the talk page, I'm not who is changing every time the article, but i'm discussing about it and you just dont see it or ignore it --Sotcr <span style="font-size: 60%;" class="autosigned">Excuse my English</span> ([[User talk:Sotcr|talk me]]) 02:47, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
276406 +++$+++ Sotcr +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276403 +++$+++ 276405 +++$+++ 2008-12-18 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.229662380E09 +++$+++ Good Day -  Sotcr <span style=\"font-size: 60%;\" class=\"autosigned\">Excuse my English<\/span> ( +++$+++ :::Good Day -  Sotcr <span style="font-size: 60%;" class="autosigned">Excuse my English</span> ([[User talk:Sotcr|talk me]]) 20:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
276407 +++$+++ Sotcr +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276403 +++$+++ 276406 +++$+++ 2008-12-19 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.229680020E09 +++$+++ And about the resolution, what is needed is a new one in a lower resolution? or the current one can be resized? Sotcr <span style=\"font-size: 60%;\" class=\"autosigned\">Excuse my English<\/span> ( +++$+++ :::: And about the resolution, what is needed is a new one in a lower resolution? or the current one can be resized? Sotcr <span style="font-size: 60%;" class="autosigned">Excuse my English</span> ([[User talk:Sotcr|talk me]]) 01:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
276408 +++$+++ Sotcr +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276403 +++$+++ 276407 +++$+++ 2008-12-27 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.230395280E09 +++$+++ So what do u think about resize the text of the new parameter?? Ouh, and Merry Christmas ;) <span style=\"font-size: 90%;\" class=\"autosigned\"> +++$+++ ::::: So what do u think about resize the text of the new parameter?? Ouh, and Merry Christmas ;) <span style="font-size: 90%;" class="autosigned">[[User:Sotcr|Sot]] <span style="font-size: 60%;" class="autosigned">Excuse my English</span> ([[User talk:Sotcr|talk me]])</span> 08:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

538551 +++$+++ BigDom +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538551 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-24 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.259113740E09 +++$+++ Hi, I have tried to address your comments on this list but there's still a couple of minor points, please could you have another look. Thanks a lot, --  +++$+++ Hi, I have tried to address your comments on this list but there's still a couple of minor points, please could you have another look. Thanks a lot, -- [[User:BigDom|<span style="color:#990033">Big</span>]][[User talk:BigDom|<span style="color:#3BB0FF"><small>Dom</small></span>]] 17:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
538552 +++$+++ BigDom +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538551 +++$+++ 538551 +++$+++ 2009-11-24 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.259118360E09 +++$+++ Hmm, still struggling but I've noticed that none of the other featured club season lists have sortable tables, so I can't really work out why this one has to... Thanks --  +++$+++ :Hmm, still struggling but I've noticed that none of the other featured club season lists have sortable tables, so I can't really work out why this one has to... Thanks -- [[User:BigDom|<span style="color:#990033">Big</span>]][[User talk:BigDom|<span style="color:#3BB0FF"><small>Dom</small></span>]] 19:06, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
538553 +++$+++ BigDom +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538551 +++$+++ 538552 +++$+++ 2009-11-24 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.259126400E09 +++$+++ I've copied the table into my sandbox [[User:BigDom\/Sandbox2|here]], any help much appreciated. Thanks --  +++$+++ ::I've copied the table into my sandbox [[User:BigDom/Sandbox2|here]], any help much appreciated. Thanks -- [[User:BigDom|<span style="color:#990033">Big</span>]][[User talk:BigDom|<span style="color:#3BB0FF"><small>Dom</small></span>]] 21:20, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
538554 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538551 +++$+++ 538553 +++$+++ 2009-11-24 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.259129880E09 +++$+++ Looks to be sorting mostly correct. The ''Pos'' column needs to be fixed now, but that shouldn't be too hard.\u2014 +++$+++ :::Looks to be sorting mostly correct. The ''Pos'' column needs to be fixed now, but that shouldn't be too hard.—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 22:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
538555 +++$+++ BigDom +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538551 +++$+++ 538554 +++$+++ 2009-11-24 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.259131320E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot, very grateful. Have managed to do the Pos column by using the {{tl|sort}} template on all the single-digit positions. --  +++$+++ ::::Thanks a lot, very grateful. Have managed to do the Pos column by using the {{tl|sort}} template on all the single-digit positions. -- [[User:BigDom|<span style="color:#990033">Big</span>]][[User talk:BigDom|<span style="color:#3BB0FF"><small>Dom</small></span>]] 22:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
538556 +++$+++ BigDom +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538551 +++$+++ 538555 +++$+++ 2009-11-25 07:31:00 +++$+++ 1.259163060E09 +++$+++ I believe that I have now addressed all your comments. Thanks, --  +++$+++ :::::I believe that I have now addressed all your comments. Thanks, -- [[User:BigDom|<span style="color:#990033">Big</span>]][[User talk:BigDom|<span style="color:#3BB0FF"><small>Dom</small></span>]] 07:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
538557 +++$+++ BigDom +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538551 +++$+++ 538556 +++$+++ 2009-11-26 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.259285760E09 +++$+++ All definitely resolved now, so would you mind having another look? Sorry to keep pestering you... --  +++$+++ ::::::All definitely resolved now, so would you mind having another look? Sorry to keep pestering you... -- [[User:BigDom|<span style="color:#990033">Big</span>]][[User talk:BigDom|<span style="color:#3BB0FF"><small>Dom</small></span>]] 17:36, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

14265 +++$+++ Sloba +++$+++ Skully Collins +++$+++ 14265 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-08 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.210305780E09 +++$+++ Glad I could help regarding Niko.Rockstar don't seem to know anything about Serbian etymology of names but it doesn't matter cuz they make great games :) -- +++$+++ Glad I could help regarding Niko.Rockstar don't seem to know anything about Serbian etymology of names but it doesn't matter cuz they make great games :) --[[User:Sloba|Sloba]] ([[User talk:Sloba|talk]]) 21:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
14266 +++$+++ Sloba +++$+++ Skully Collins +++$+++ 14265 +++$+++ 14265 +++$+++ 2008-05-10 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.210449300E09 +++$+++ Heh,but you were right.you seem to know stuff about the part of Europe I live in,which is sort of a rarity on the net nowadays  -- +++$+++ :Heh,but you were right.you seem to know stuff about the part of Europe I live in,which is sort of a rarity on the net nowadays  --[[User:Sloba|Sloba]] ([[User talk:Sloba|talk]]) 12:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

482975 +++$+++ DanMS +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482975 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-22 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.185172920E09 +++$+++ I have a user subpage that I no longer need. Is it acceptable for me as an admin to delete my own user subpages, or do I need to go through the [[WP:CSD#U1|CSD U1]] process? &#9679; +++$+++ I have a user subpage that I no longer need. Is it acceptable for me as an admin to delete my own user subpages, or do I need to go through the [[WP:CSD#U1|CSD U1]] process? &#9679;[[User:DanMS|DanMS]] • [[User talk:DanMS|Talk]] 23:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
482976 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 482975 +++$+++ 482975 +++$+++ 2007-07-22 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.185173940E09 +++$+++ I do all the time and I've seen others as well.  At some point, [[WP:IAR]] kicks in and we're allowed to use common sense.  I had the same guilt pangs when I was first sysopped but realized that few even notice what you do, esp. if it's to your own pages.  \u2014 +++$+++ :I do all the time and I've seen others as well.  At some point, [[WP:IAR]] kicks in and we're allowed to use common sense.  I had the same guilt pangs when I was first sysopped but realized that few even notice what you do, esp. if it's to your own pages.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 23:59, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

276412 +++$+++ Josh_the_Nerd +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276412 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-20 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.229826120E09 +++$+++ You should know better than to be [[Wikipedia:Civility|uncivil]] and use profanity. -  +++$+++ You should know better than to be [[Wikipedia:Civility|uncivil]] and use profanity. - [[User:Josh the Nerd|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh the Nerd|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Josh_the_Nerd|contribs]]) 18:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
276413 +++$+++ Josh_the_Nerd +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276412 +++$+++ 276412 +++$+++ 2008-12-21 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.229860920E09 +++$+++ If this behavior continues, I'm going to list you on [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts]]. -  +++$+++ :If this behavior continues, I'm going to list you on [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts]]. - [[User:Josh the Nerd|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh the Nerd|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Josh_the_Nerd|contribs]]) 04:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
276414 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276412 +++$+++ 276413 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.229968800E09 +++$+++ Josh, people have been threatening to do that for years, but it never pans out.  The basic reality is this:  The entirety of [[User:Jasper Deng]]'s contributions to Wikipedia involve engaging in arguments with, and pointing out errors made by other editors -- he does absolutely zero work on the encyclopedia itself.  I don't have any regard (nor should I be expected to) for people that come to the encyclopedia with the express purpose of criticising the work we do, but make no good-faith effort to make improvements. I work far too hard on this thing to have to be expected to take that kind of abuse.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ :: Josh, people have been threatening to do that for years, but it never pans out.  The basic reality is this:  The entirety of [[User:Jasper Deng]]'s contributions to Wikipedia involve engaging in arguments with, and pointing out errors made by other editors -- he does absolutely zero work on the encyclopedia itself.  I don't have any regard (nor should I be expected to) for people that come to the encyclopedia with the express purpose of criticising the work we do, but make no good-faith effort to make improvements. I work far too hard on this thing to have to be expected to take that kind of abuse.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 10:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

609566 +++$+++ Edge865 +++$+++ The Haunted Angel +++$+++ 609566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.168927200E09 +++$+++ Why is it irrelevant?  +++$+++ Why is it irrelevant? [[User:Edge865|Edge865 &#91;&#91;Wikipedian Through And Through]]]] 22:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
609567 +++$+++ The Haunted Angel +++$+++ The Haunted Angel +++$+++ 609566 +++$+++ 609566 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.168927260E09 +++$+++ Forgive the paradox of sarcasm here; but because it has no relevance. \u2248 '''<font color=\"Indigo\"> +++$+++ :Forgive the paradox of sarcasm here; but because it has no relevance. ≈ '''<font color="Indigo">[[User:The Haunted Angel|The Haunted Angel]]</font>''' <sup>([[User talk:The Haunted Angel|The Forest Whispers My Name]])</sup> 22:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

538560 +++$+++ Remember +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-20 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.258778100E09 +++$+++ Want to help me bring Fred Boye to DYK? I am pretty much finished with it, but I would still really appreciate any help you could provide.  You can find the draft article here -[[User:Remember\/SandboxList|Fred Boye]].   +++$+++ Want to help me bring Fred Boye to DYK? I am pretty much finished with it, but I would still really appreciate any help you could provide.  You can find the draft article here -[[User:Remember/SandboxList|Fred Boye]].  [[User:Remember|Remember]] ([[User talk:Remember|talk]]) 20:35, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
538561 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538560 +++$+++ 538560 +++$+++ 2009-11-20 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.258778340E09 +++$+++ The requirements for DYK are not too strict. What are you needing help on? Obviously, the article needs to be longer.\u2014 +++$+++ :The requirements for DYK are not too strict. What are you needing help on? Obviously, the article needs to be longer.—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 20:39, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
538562 +++$+++ Remember +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538560 +++$+++ 538561 +++$+++ 2009-11-20 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.258778400E09 +++$+++ Not sure there is much to do, but take a quick review of it if you could.  Also, if you were able to find any other sources on this guy that would be helpful, cause I can't find anything else.  +++$+++ ::Not sure there is much to do, but take a quick review of it if you could.  Also, if you were able to find any other sources on this guy that would be helpful, cause I can't find anything else. [[User:Remember|Remember]] ([[User talk:Remember|talk]]) 20:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
538563 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538560 +++$+++ 538562 +++$+++ 2009-11-20 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.258779000E09 +++$+++ You're right. There's [http:\/\/news.google.com\/archivesearch?as_q=&num=50&hl=en&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=fred+boye&as_oq=&as_eq=&ned=us&as_user_ldate=&as_user_hdate=&lr=&as_src=&as_price=p0&as_scoring=a not much] out there about him. Did he play polo?\u2014 +++$+++ :::You're right. There's [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_q=&num=50&hl=en&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=fred+boye&as_oq=&as_eq=&ned=us&as_user_ldate=&as_user_hdate=&lr=&as_src=&as_price=p0&as_scoring=a not much] out there about him. Did he play polo?—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 20:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
538564 +++$+++ Remember +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538560 +++$+++ 538563 +++$+++ 2009-11-20 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.258779420E09 +++$+++ I don't think so.  But that's funny cause I came across the same stuff and wondered the same thing.  Maybe I will just expand the article based on the one source I have.  +++$+++ ::::I don't think so.  But that's funny cause I came across the same stuff and wondered the same thing.  Maybe I will just expand the article based on the one source I have. [[User:Remember|Remember]] ([[User talk:Remember|talk]]) 20:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

276417 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-23 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.230080100E09 +++$+++ In the future, please do some basic research before aruging something so very easily proven to be untrue.  It wastes everybody's time.  Thanks.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ In the future, please do some basic research before aruging something so very easily proven to be untrue.  It wastes everybody's time.  Thanks.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 16:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
276418 +++$+++ S3884h +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276417 +++$+++ 276417 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.230086160E09 +++$+++ On and one last thing, Merry Christmas.   +++$+++ :On and one last thing, Merry Christmas.  [[User:S3884h|S3884h]] ([[User talk:S3884h|talk]]) 18:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
276419 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276417 +++$+++ 276418 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.230091440E09 +++$+++ Oh, and don't think that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&diff=prev&oldid=249360262 this edit of yours] where you changed the lead sentence of the [[Sarah Palin]] article to add \"who I want to have hot passionate anal sex with\", the day before the 2008 Presidential Election, hasn't gone unnoticed.  Between that and your assertions that what a television's own web site says the name of the show is not relevant... is this a a sign of the quality of contributions you plan on bringing to the encyclopedia in the future?  Because frankly, we'd be better off without. <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ :: Oh, and don't think that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&diff=prev&oldid=249360262 this edit of yours] where you changed the lead sentence of the [[Sarah Palin]] article to add "who I want to have hot passionate anal sex with", the day before the 2008 Presidential Election, hasn't gone unnoticed.  Between that and your assertions that what a television's own web site says the name of the show is not relevant... is this a a sign of the quality of contributions you plan on bringing to the encyclopedia in the future?  Because frankly, we'd be better off without. <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 20:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
276420 +++$+++ S3884h +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276417 +++$+++ 276419 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.230092100E09 +++$+++ Uh what?  +++$+++ :::Uh what? [[User:S3884h|S3884h]] ([[User talk:S3884h|talk]]) 20:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

14274 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Skully Collins +++$+++ 14274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-29 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.222737780E09 +++$+++ I will try and remember about Peterson, but I might need prompting, which I don't mind! ;-)  +++$+++ I will try and remember about Peterson, but I might need prompting, which I don't mind! ;-) [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] ([[User talk:4u1e|talk]]) 18:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
14275 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Skully Collins +++$+++ 14274 +++$+++ 14274 +++$+++ 2008-09-30 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.222822500E09 +++$+++ I'll do a peer review on the article talk page: I'm not yet sure how long it will end up!  +++$+++ :I'll do a peer review on the article talk page: I'm not yet sure how long it will end up! [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] ([[User talk:4u1e|talk]]) 17:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

276421 +++$+++ Wj32 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-23 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.230098400E09 +++$+++ It is a fact that a tiny amount of programs use the [[Native API]] - in fact, on the Native API page it says: \"Some rootkits make use of the Native API to hide their presence from malware detection software.<sup>[2]<\/sup>\" (that statement has a source). Saying \"some\" in that case is ''not'' a weasel word since we aren't saying \"some people say...\". It is impossible to state how '''many''' there are since we don't know how many programs have been written that use the Native API. How would you state the fact that some programs use the Native API? The truth is, the statement \"All Windows programs must interact with the Windows API\" is false. -- +++$+++ It is a fact that a tiny amount of programs use the [[Native API]] - in fact, on the Native API page it says: "Some rootkits make use of the Native API to hide their presence from malware detection software.<sup>[2]</sup>" (that statement has a source). Saying "some" in that case is ''not'' a weasel word since we aren't saying "some people say...". It is impossible to state how '''many''' there are since we don't know how many programs have been written that use the Native API. How would you state the fact that some programs use the Native API? The truth is, the statement "All Windows programs must interact with the Windows API" is false. --[[User:Wj32|wj32]] <sup>[[User talk:Wj32|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Wj32|c]]</sup> 22:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
276422 +++$+++ Wj32 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276421 +++$+++ 276421 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.230098640E09 +++$+++ And, on the Native API page, it says \"... a few components, such as the Client\/Server Runtime Subsystem are implemented using the Native API, as they are started early enough in the Windows NT Startup Process that the Windows API is not available yet.\". This means that \"All Windows programs must interact with the Windows API\" is false. -- +++$+++ : And, on the Native API page, it says "... a few components, such as the Client/Server Runtime Subsystem are implemented using the Native API, as they are started early enough in the Windows NT Startup Process that the Windows API is not available yet.". This means that "All Windows programs must interact with the Windows API" is false. --[[User:Wj32|wj32]] <sup>[[User talk:Wj32|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Wj32|c]]</sup> 22:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
276423 +++$+++ Wj32 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276421 +++$+++ 276421 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.230098760E09 +++$+++ Oh, and another source: [http:\/\/technet.microsoft.com\/en-us\/sysinternals\/bb897447.aspx]. So, will you let me correct the misinformation if I add the source? -- +++$+++ : Oh, and another source: [http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897447.aspx]. So, will you let me correct the misinformation if I add the source? --[[User:Wj32|wj32]] <sup>[[User talk:Wj32|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Wj32|c]]</sup> 22:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
276424 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276421 +++$+++ 276423 +++$+++ 2008-12-24 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.230132600E09 +++$+++ As long as a reliable source backs up such a statement, it'll be fine.  We really need to avoid adding to the use of unattributed, weasel-worded statements on Wikipedia, and unattributed statements in general.  Thanks.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ :: As long as a reliable source backs up such a statement, it'll be fine.  We really need to avoid adding to the use of unattributed, weasel-worded statements on Wikipedia, and unattributed statements in general.  Thanks.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 07:30, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

395596 +++$+++ Awickert +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-27 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.303899720E09 +++$+++ Thanks once again for cleaning up my messes for me, often before I even realize that I made them. Failed to \"preview\" and realize what I was doing, and since I was editing in multiple windows at once, I didn't post-view until you'd already taken care of everything. Thank you!  +++$+++ Thanks once again for cleaning up my messes for me, often before I even realize that I made them. Failed to "preview" and realize what I was doing, and since I was editing in multiple windows at once, I didn't post-view until you'd already taken care of everything. Thank you! [[User:Awickert|Awickert]] ([[User talk:Awickert|talk]]) 03:22, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
395597 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395596 +++$+++ 395596 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.303900620E09 +++$+++ No problem ... was a bit concerned that I might have caused an edit conflict in case you were still at it. Applying the \"fringe hat\" to the talk page was quite overdue - well done.  +++$+++ :No problem ... was a bit concerned that I might have caused an edit conflict in case you were still at it. Applying the "fringe hat" to the talk page was quite overdue - well done. [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] ([[User talk:Vsmith#top|talk]]) 03:37, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
395598 +++$+++ Awickert +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395596 +++$+++ 395597 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.303907100E09 +++$+++ Hope things have been well with you; the list of things I wanted to do here built my drive enough to pop in and do some of it; I expect to lie low again for some time, but I hope to get to write more this summer.  +++$+++ ::Hope things have been well with you; the list of things I wanted to do here built my drive enough to pop in and do some of it; I expect to lie low again for some time, but I hope to get to write more this summer. [[User:Awickert|Awickert]] ([[User talk:Awickert|talk]]) 05:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

276426 +++$+++ Josh_the_Nerd +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-27 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.230449040E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts#User:Warren]] -  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts#User:Warren]] - [[User:Josh the Nerd|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh the Nerd|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Josh_the_Nerd|contribs]]) 23:24, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
276427 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276426 +++$+++ 276426 +++$+++ 2008-12-30 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.230666480E09 +++$+++ No, it's not.  Don't be confused by what the show's graphic says; graphic designers don't decide the names of shows.  The graphic is telling you both the name of the show, ''and its host''.  If you read, say, the [http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/28257606\/ press release] announcing Shuster's selection as the host of the show, they put the words \"1600 Pennsylvania Avenue\" in quotes.  Same thing with [http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/28368549\/ the transcript for the most recent show].  You are also welcome to check your local TV listings, the source code to the 1600 Pa. Ave [http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/23580538\/ home page] (which does not contain the words \"with David\"), and any number of other [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] (e.g. [http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/12\/15\/business\/media\/15msnbc.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1230637817-vPzBBYAZpFyYXecxR9YWnw New York Times]), which is the only true criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : No, it's not.  Don't be confused by what the show's graphic says; graphic designers don't decide the names of shows.  The graphic is telling you both the name of the show, ''and its host''.  If you read, say, the [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28257606/ press release] announcing Shuster's selection as the host of the show, they put the words "1600 Pennsylvania Avenue" in quotes.  Same thing with [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28368549/ the transcript for the most recent show].  You are also welcome to check your local TV listings, the source code to the 1600 Pa. Ave [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23580538/ home page] (which does not contain the words "with David"), and any number of other [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] (e.g. [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/15/business/media/15msnbc.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1230637817-vPzBBYAZpFyYXecxR9YWnw New York Times]), which is the only true criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 11:48, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
276428 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276426 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-30 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.230698940E09 +++$+++ Sigh... ''please'' read what I said above.  Statements like \"If you went to the MSNBC site\", when I quite clearly and explicitly linked to that very site, right above where you typed this, don't help. <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ ::: Sigh... ''please'' read what I said above.  Statements like "If you went to the MSNBC site", when I quite clearly and explicitly linked to that very site, right above where you typed this, don't help. <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 20:49, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

538571 +++$+++ Geologik +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-04 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.259991900E09 +++$+++ Hey, I know you're handy with all the complicated syntax stuff and I was wondering if you could take a look at {{tl|Infobox NCAA Division I FCS season}} and help figure out why the 2010 year won't appear in the infobox when linked from [[2009 NCAA Division I FCS football season]] to [[2010 NCAA Division I FCS football season]]. There is no 2010 FBS season article yet so I'm not sure if the same situation will arise there as well with the FBS box(probably since both templates pretty much use the same code).  +++$+++ Hey, I know you're handy with all the complicated syntax stuff and I was wondering if you could take a look at {{tl|Infobox NCAA Division I FCS season}} and help figure out why the 2010 year won't appear in the infobox when linked from [[2009 NCAA Division I FCS football season]] to [[2010 NCAA Division I FCS football season]]. There is no 2010 FBS season article yet so I'm not sure if the same situation will arise there as well with the FBS box(probably since both templates pretty much use the same code). [[User:Geologik|Geologik]] ([[User talk:Geologik|talk]]) 21:45, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
538572 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538571 +++$+++ 538571 +++$+++ 2009-12-04 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.259992080E09 +++$+++ Looks like the link to the 2010 article will appear on January 1.\u2014 +++$+++ :Looks like the link to the 2010 article will appear on January 1.—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 21:48, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
538573 +++$+++ Geologik +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538571 +++$+++ 538572 +++$+++ 2009-12-04 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.259992320E09 +++$+++ \/facepalm<br> And here I've been combing through the pages trying to find out what was going on. Doh.  +++$+++ :: /facepalm<br> And here I've been combing through the pages trying to find out what was going on. Doh. [[User:Geologik|Geologik]] ([[User talk:Geologik|talk]]) 21:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

538574 +++$+++ Pedro thy master +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538574 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-06 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.260172740E09 +++$+++ Can you review the [[Family Guy]] season 5-- +++$+++ Can you review the [[Family Guy]] season 5--[[User:Pedro thy master|<font color="Orange">Pedro J.</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Pedro thy master|<span style="color: #000080">the rookie</span>]]</sup> 23:59, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
538575 +++$+++ Pedro thy master +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538574 +++$+++ 538574 +++$+++ 2009-12-07 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.260172860E09 +++$+++ it has been re-nominated as you reviewed it can you do tjhat again-- +++$+++ :it has been re-nominated as you reviewed it can you do tjhat again--[[User:Pedro thy master|<font color="Orange">Pedro J.</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Pedro thy master|<span style="color: #000080">the rookie</span>]]</sup> 00:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

14288 +++$+++ thegreenj +++$+++ Skully Collins +++$+++ 14288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-06 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.244349240E09 +++$+++ I really like this new series; the pictures are much improved. The only things that might. stand between these and featured status, IMO, are technical details: color balance, chromatic aberration, noise, and detail. I've tried a quick fix for the first two problems on my favorite of the series [[:File:James Calado Oulton Park 2009 (1) edit.JPG|here]]. Other than that, I think you may get some better feedback by trying out FPC and seeing what voters expect. Overall, though, very nice handling of panning. If you do try for FP, good luck!  +++$+++ I really like this new series; the pictures are much improved. The only things that might. stand between these and featured status, IMO, are technical details: color balance, chromatic aberration, noise, and detail. I've tried a quick fix for the first two problems on my favorite of the series [[:File:James Calado Oulton Park 2009 (1) edit.JPG|here]]. Other than that, I think you may get some better feedback by trying out FPC and seeing what voters expect. Overall, though, very nice handling of panning. If you do try for FP, good luck! [[User:Thegreenj|Thegreenj]] 21:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
14289 +++$+++ thegreenj +++$+++ Skully Collins +++$+++ 14288 +++$+++ 14288 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.244365140E09 +++$+++ I'm using Photoshop 5.5. I'm not familiar with editing programs outside of Photoshop, but I can give some pointers for CA correction if you'd like. I copy the image as another layer to use as a mask, then, on the bottom layer, make localized use of the \"replace color\" tool to desaturate and, if needed, darken purple\/green fringes. After, I erase the affected areas from the top layer. Can't wait (hopefully) to see photos from the Renault World Series.  +++$+++ *I'm using Photoshop 5.5. I'm not familiar with editing programs outside of Photoshop, but I can give some pointers for CA correction if you'd like. I copy the image as another layer to use as a mask, then, on the bottom layer, make localized use of the "replace color" tool to desaturate and, if needed, darken purple/green fringes. After, I erase the affected areas from the top layer. Can't wait (hopefully) to see photos from the Renault World Series. [[User:Thegreenj|Thegreenj]] 01:59, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

276434 +++$+++ 69.106.246.15 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-10 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.231642800E09 +++$+++ If, on the other hand, that was not your intent then, even though \"Microsoft is a company, not software\", would you please put things back as you found them.  Thanks [[Special:Contributions\/69.106.246.15|69.106.246.15]] ( +++$+++ If, on the other hand, that was not your intent then, even though "Microsoft is a company, not software", would you please put things back as you found them.  Thanks [[Special:Contributions/69.106.246.15|69.106.246.15]] ([[User talk:69.106.246.15|talk]]) 19:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
276435 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276434 +++$+++ 276434 +++$+++ 2009-01-10 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.231652580E09 +++$+++ Creating [[:Category:History of Microsoft software]] is probably the appropriate solution to bridge the two topics (software, and Microsoft) together.  Go ahead and do this if you like; you will need a user account to do this, however.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Creating [[:Category:History of Microsoft software]] is probably the appropriate solution to bridge the two topics (software, and Microsoft) together.  Go ahead and do this if you like; you will need a user account to do this, however.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 21:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
276436 +++$+++ 71.135.187.78 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276434 +++$+++ 276435 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 08:48:00 +++$+++ 1.231692480E09 +++$+++ The \"soft\" in Microsoft ''is'' software. Yes, they have a few bits of hardware with their logo on them, but that is not what characterizes the company.  Why is [[:Category:Microsoft history]] not appropriate in the software category tree?  [[Special:Contributions\/71.135.187.78|71.135.187.78]] ( +++$+++ ::The "soft" in Microsoft ''is'' software. Yes, they have a few bits of hardware with their logo on them, but that is not what characterizes the company.  Why is [[:Category:Microsoft history]] not appropriate in the software category tree?  [[Special:Contributions/71.135.187.78|71.135.187.78]] ([[User talk:71.135.187.78|talk]]) 08:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
276437 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276434 +++$+++ 276436 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.231693980E09 +++$+++ But let's be honest here, just about ''every'' article about something Microsoft has done (software or otherwise) could be shoehorned into a \"Microsoft history\" category, because every article we have -- several hundred of them -- documents something they've done in the course of history.  [[Windows NT 3.51]] documents an aspect of Microsoft's history, as do [[ASP.NET]], [[Microsoft Visual Studio]] and [[QBasic]] and dozens of others... would they all count for this category?  Can you see how this could very quickly turn into a mess?  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ :::But let's be honest here, just about ''every'' article about something Microsoft has done (software or otherwise) could be shoehorned into a "Microsoft history" category, because every article we have -- several hundred of them -- documents something they've done in the course of history.  [[Windows NT 3.51]] documents an aspect of Microsoft's history, as do [[ASP.NET]], [[Microsoft Visual Studio]] and [[QBasic]] and dozens of others... would they all count for this category?  Can you see how this could very quickly turn into a mess?  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 09:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

538582 +++$+++ Remember +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-14 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.260826560E09 +++$+++ I was inspired by your list of Oklahoma head coaches and I have been working on creating a list of North Carolina Tar Heels men's basketball head coaches [[User:Remember\/SandboxUNC|here]].  I think the list is good enough to go live now and I was going to propose it as a DYK.  I was then going to get it up to GA and then FA status.  Let me know if you want to help out with any of this.  Any help you could give would be most appreciated.  +++$+++ I was inspired by your list of Oklahoma head coaches and I have been working on creating a list of North Carolina Tar Heels men's basketball head coaches [[User:Remember/SandboxUNC|here]].  I think the list is good enough to go live now and I was going to propose it as a DYK.  I was then going to get it up to GA and then FA status.  Let me know if you want to help out with any of this.  Any help you could give would be most appreciated. [[User:Remember|Remember]] ([[User talk:Remember|talk]]) 13:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
538583 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538582 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.260856980E09 +++$+++ Review left on article's talk page.\u2014 +++$+++ ::Review left on article's talk page.—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 22:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
538584 +++$+++ Remember +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538582 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-15 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.260935400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your review.  I have made lots of changes to the article based on your comment.  I am still working through some of them, but check out my revisions and let me know what you think.  +++$+++ :::Thanks for your review.  I have made lots of changes to the article based on your comment.  I am still working through some of them, but check out my revisions and let me know what you think. [[User:Remember|Remember]] ([[User talk:Remember|talk]]) 19:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
538585 +++$+++ Remember +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538582 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-16 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.261009320E09 +++$+++ I have worked through all of your comments.  Do you have any others? +++$+++ ::::I have worked through all of your comments.  Do you have any others?[[User:Remember|Remember]] ([[User talk:Remember|talk]]) 16:22, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

276441 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-23 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.232716680E09 +++$+++ I don't get the point of that template. It's much clearer to simply type the date out conventionally, and in some instances it'll be shorter than typing out the template code.  +++$+++ I don't get the point of that template. It's much clearer to simply type the date out conventionally, and in some instances it'll be shorter than typing out the template code. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 05:18, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
276442 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276441 +++$+++ 276441 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.232779680E09 +++$+++ Reading it, that really has little relevance to the average Wiki user.  +++$+++ :Reading it, that really has little relevance to the average Wiki user. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 22:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

550021 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-24 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.156487340E09 +++$+++ I perfectly know that the name was voted over a while ago (I did vote for the current name at the time indeed). Panonian stopped changing the links once I asked him to bring the issue to the talk page for discussion. But I have to say that it is impossible to have a debate on this if people keep on namecalling and failing to assume good faith (I am not talking about you, of course). Yes, consensus was reached before but if there are editors who are not happy with the outcome (and were not aware of the previous debate, as this is the case with Panonian), I reckon that we should revisit the discussion and maybe even going that far as giving the informal ''vote'' a straw poll legitimacy. Panonian is NOT an edit warrior: IMHO, there is no need for blocks and so on. Regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ I perfectly know that the name was voted over a while ago (I did vote for the current name at the time indeed). Panonian stopped changing the links once I asked him to bring the issue to the talk page for discussion. But I have to say that it is impossible to have a debate on this if people keep on namecalling and failing to assume good faith (I am not talking about you, of course). Yes, consensus was reached before but if there are editors who are not happy with the outcome (and were not aware of the previous debate, as this is the case with Panonian), I reckon that we should revisit the discussion and maybe even going that far as giving the informal ''vote'' a straw poll legitimacy. Panonian is NOT an edit warrior: IMHO, there is no need for blocks and so on. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 23:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
550022 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550021 +++$+++ 550021 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 09:01:00 +++$+++ 1.156521660E09 +++$+++ I thank you on your attempt to mediate in this case. I feel we need a mediator which will help us overcome this incident. I would like PANONIAN to know that I'm ready to live in peace with him, as long as we don't threaten each other and as long as we both play by the rules. Because, rules of Wikipedia take care of everything. And I, you can be sure of that, can live in peace with anybody, no matter what his nationality or point of view is, as long as we both have good faith. -- +++$+++ : I thank you on your attempt to mediate in this case. I feel we need a mediator which will help us overcome this incident. I would like PANONIAN to know that I'm ready to live in peace with him, as long as we don't threaten each other and as long as we both play by the rules. Because, rules of Wikipedia take care of everything. And I, you can be sure of that, can live in peace with anybody, no matter what his nationality or point of view is, as long as we both have good faith. --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 09:01, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
550023 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550021 +++$+++ 550022 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.156524720E09 +++$+++ Thanks Dijxtra for your long reply. I wasn't really blaming you for anything. Even more, <flattery>I think you're one of the more level-headed admins I've ever encountered<\/flattery>. I simply wanted you to put yourself on his skin at the time. Last night, I was a little bit annoyed with the ''roll-on effect'' comments from other admins (i.e. ajn's), which I found excessively harsh (P's no crazy editwarrior). I feel responsible for the fact that I suggested Panonian to bring the issue up for discussion to the article's talk page but neither did I then take part on the actual debate myself, nor did I fully explain the whole [[WP:RQM]] procedure to him. I'm not sure if he's going to listen to me now, as he's already indicated that he longer wishes to take part on any discussion. I'm willing to properly format the RQM and place it myself once things cool down -I would keep my own opinion for myself-, but I share your concerns about people being on holiday and so on (I don't think Panonian was being 'sneaky' here either, just having more wikitime to spare and following my ill-advise). Thanks and regards, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::Thanks Dijxtra for your long reply. I wasn't really blaming you for anything. Even more, <flattery>I think you're one of the more level-headed admins I've ever encountered</flattery>. I simply wanted you to put yourself on his skin at the time. Last night, I was a little bit annoyed with the ''roll-on effect'' comments from other admins (i.e. ajn's), which I found excessively harsh (P's no crazy editwarrior). I feel responsible for the fact that I suggested Panonian to bring the issue up for discussion to the article's talk page but neither did I then take part on the actual debate myself, nor did I fully explain the whole [[WP:RQM]] procedure to him. I'm not sure if he's going to listen to me now, as he's already indicated that he longer wishes to take part on any discussion. I'm willing to properly format the RQM and place it myself once things cool down -I would keep my own opinion for myself-, but I share your concerns about people being on holiday and so on (I don't think Panonian was being 'sneaky' here either, just having more wikitime to spare and following my ill-advise). Thanks and regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 09:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
550024 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550021 +++$+++ 550023 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.157217660E09 +++$+++ I agree about waiting. I just think that the last bout of reverts in quite disruptive and would like it to stop somehow. Hope you're doing well. [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::I agree about waiting. I just think that the last bout of reverts in quite disruptive and would like it to stop somehow. Hope you're doing well. [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 10:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
550025 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550021 +++$+++ 550024 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.157219100E09 +++$+++ As for the war article... well, the shit finaly hit the fan (I was amased to see the article edit-war-free for such a long time) and we have to learn to live with that. Stoping the reverts and disruptions is... well, I'd put my money on \"impossible\". So, what we need is to enforce the rules. Play by the book. That's my proposal. When things get nasty, we protect it. After a week, we unprotect it. Then we protect it again when the war reinitiates. If somebody wants to move the article, he has to make decent RQM. And so on. And if things don't cool down after saaay 2 months, we do some RFCing, and then some RFMing and then some RFArbing and then we live happily ever after. Well, at least those who played by the book. Then, when the thing finally settles down and when I promote [[List of inhabited islands of Croatia]] to FL, I get myself few real, fat books on the war (both from Croatian and Serbian POV) and we do some WP:CITE and WP:V. That's the general idea I have about the article. What say you? :-) -- +++$+++ ::::As for the war article... well, the shit finaly hit the fan (I was amased to see the article edit-war-free for such a long time) and we have to learn to live with that. Stoping the reverts and disruptions is... well, I'd put my money on "impossible". So, what we need is to enforce the rules. Play by the book. That's my proposal. When things get nasty, we protect it. After a week, we unprotect it. Then we protect it again when the war reinitiates. If somebody wants to move the article, he has to make decent RQM. And so on. And if things don't cool down after saaay 2 months, we do some RFCing, and then some RFMing and then some RFArbing and then we live happily ever after. Well, at least those who played by the book. Then, when the thing finally settles down and when I promote [[List of inhabited islands of Croatia]] to FL, I get myself few real, fat books on the war (both from Croatian and Serbian POV) and we do some WP:CITE and WP:V. That's the general idea I have about the article. What say you? :-) --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 10:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
550026 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550021 +++$+++ 550025 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.157249220E09 +++$+++ Ah! No problem, I usually miss replies myself too. Yes, I have faith on Wikipedia rules but it's kind of sad having to go that route (RFC, RFM, RFA...) when things could well work out if people talk to each other (in an ideal world). I think these periods come and go. Can you remember the edit warring on [[Plitvice lakes]] (relatively quiet since I put together [[Plitvice Lakes (municipality)]] as a legit ''content fork'') and [[Borovo Selo raid]] (quite settled after [[Talk:Borovo_Selo_killings#Comments_on_the_new_version_by_ChrisO|ChrisO's rewrite]])? I guess we have to live with it. Hopefully everything will work out without having to go down the [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Kosovo|Kosovo route]]. Cheers, [[User:Asterion\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''''E  '''''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::::Ah! No problem, I usually miss replies myself too. Yes, I have faith on Wikipedia rules but it's kind of sad having to go that route (RFC, RFM, RFA...) when things could well work out if people talk to each other (in an ideal world). I think these periods come and go. Can you remember the edit warring on [[Plitvice lakes]] (relatively quiet since I put together [[Plitvice Lakes (municipality)]] as a legit ''content fork'') and [[Borovo Selo raid]] (quite settled after [[Talk:Borovo_Selo_killings#Comments_on_the_new_version_by_ChrisO|ChrisO's rewrite]])? I guess we have to live with it. Hopefully everything will work out without having to go down the [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Kosovo|Kosovo route]]. Cheers, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E  '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 19:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

14301 +++$+++ White Shadows +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-05 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.307334840E09 +++$+++ All the best,-- +++$+++ All the best,--[[user:White Shadows|<font style="color:#191970">'''White Shadows'''</font>]] <sup>[[user talk:White Shadows|<font style="color:#DC143C">'''Stuck in square one'''</font>]]</sup> 21:34, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
14302 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14301 +++$+++ 14301 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.307704440E09 +++$+++ I'll note that in proper style guides (e.g. MLA, ''Chicago'', APA), the editor names should not be last, first... you see why I don't use the templates anymore. ;-) Regards,  +++$+++ :I'll note that in proper style guides (e.g. MLA, ''Chicago'', APA), the editor names should not be last, first... you see why I don't use the templates anymore. ;-) Regards, [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 04:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
14303 +++$+++ White Shadows +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14301 +++$+++ 14302 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.307948280E09 +++$+++ Hey, sorry for the delay in responding. Thanks a lot Ed! When I get the chance, I'll try that. BTW, you make a good point about not using the templates. Perhaps we should bring this up somewhere? To try to change the way the Templates are structured?-- +++$+++ ::Hey, sorry for the delay in responding. Thanks a lot Ed! When I get the chance, I'll try that. BTW, you make a good point about not using the templates. Perhaps we should bring this up somewhere? To try to change the way the Templates are structured?--[[user:White Shadows|<font style="color:#191970">'''White Shadows'''</font>]] <sup>[[user talk:White Shadows|<font style="color:#DC143C">'''Stuck in square one'''</font>]]</sup> 23:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14304 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14301 +++$+++ 14303 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.307950020E09 +++$+++ Hey, no big deal and anytime! I left a note at [[Template talk:Cite book]], but I don't use them because they don't produce a real citation style... it's a mashup of APA with a couple other things.  +++$+++ :::Hey, no big deal and anytime! I left a note at [[Template talk:Cite book]], but I don't use them because they don't produce a real citation style... it's a mashup of APA with a couple other things. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 00:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
14305 +++$+++ White Shadows +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14301 +++$+++ 14304 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.307950500E09 +++$+++ Alright. Anyway, I'll probably give you a ping again when I'm done, just to see if I did it correctly. (I also need to go through the other A-H BBs and fix them up to, before Buggie or I nominate another one for an ACR)-- +++$+++ ::::Alright. Anyway, I'll probably give you a ping again when I'm done, just to see if I did it correctly. (I also need to go through the other A-H BBs and fix them up to, before Buggie or I nominate another one for an ACR)--[[user:White Shadows|<font style="color:#191970">'''White Shadows'''</font>]] <sup>[[user talk:White Shadows|<font style="color:#DC143C">'''Stuck in square one'''</font>]]</sup> 00:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
14306 +++$+++ White Shadows +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14301 +++$+++ 14305 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.307950680E09 +++$+++ Oh! One more thing, I guess it would be best to switch over to the proper style guide when nominating the article at FAC? Or would they let it slide considering that it's not standard in the templates?-- +++$+++ :::::Oh! One more thing, I guess it would be best to switch over to the proper style guide when nominating the article at FAC? Or would they let it slide considering that it's not standard in the templates?--[[user:White Shadows|<font style="color:#191970">'''White Shadows'''</font>]] <sup>[[user talk:White Shadows|<font style="color:#DC143C">'''Stuck in square one'''</font>]]</sup> 00:38, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
14307 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14301 +++$+++ 14306 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.307952000E09 +++$+++ Haha, WS, it's fine to use the templates! They are fully accepted at FAC. I just choose to use ''Chicago'' because I'm a history major. You're allowed to use whatever style you want so long as it is consistent. :-)  +++$+++ ::::::Haha, WS, it's fine to use the templates! They are fully accepted at FAC. I just choose to use ''Chicago'' because I'm a history major. You're allowed to use whatever style you want so long as it is consistent. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 01:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
14308 +++$+++ White Shadows +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14301 +++$+++ 14307 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.307952120E09 +++$+++ Really? I'm going to major in History in College when I enter next year. I inserted what you showed me in the citation but it came out rather odd...where did I go wrong? (Sorry for all the questions, I'm feel like a new editor here!)-- +++$+++ :::::::Really? I'm going to major in History in College when I enter next year. I inserted what you showed me in the citation but it came out rather odd...where did I go wrong? (Sorry for all the questions, I'm feel like a new editor here!)--[[user:White Shadows|<font style="color:#191970">'''White Shadows'''</font>]] <sup>[[user talk:White Shadows|<font style="color:#DC143C">'''Stuck in square one'''</font>]]</sup> 01:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
14309 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14301 +++$+++ 14308 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.307953380E09 +++$+++ Eh, I don't mind the questions! Link me to the article and I'll take a look after work... I have a 9pm to close shift tonight (=about four hours, which isn't worth it, but at least it's an atypical shift!) Where are you planning on attending college?  +++$+++ ::::::::Eh, I don't mind the questions! Link me to the article and I'll take a look after work... I have a 9pm to close shift tonight (=about four hours, which isn't worth it, but at least it's an atypical shift!) Where are you planning on attending college? [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 01:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
14310 +++$+++ White Shadows +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14301 +++$+++ 14309 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.307953680E09 +++$+++ [[SMS Zrinyi|Here you go]]. Thanks again. As for college...I'm still not sure. I want to attend UVA (I live in Virgina) but my father (my parents divorced when I was about 1) currently works as a Business Professor (Technically Marketing) at South Carolina so I may very well end up going there, considering that we get a rather decent discount. However, for my PhD, I want to attend UCLA (I have an aunt and cousins who live in LA so it's not that big of a deal) as they have one of the best History Programs in the nation among public colleges.-- +++$+++ :::::::::[[SMS Zrinyi|Here you go]]. Thanks again. As for college...I'm still not sure. I want to attend UVA (I live in Virgina) but my father (my parents divorced when I was about 1) currently works as a Business Professor (Technically Marketing) at South Carolina so I may very well end up going there, considering that we get a rather decent discount. However, for my PhD, I want to attend UCLA (I have an aunt and cousins who live in LA so it's not that big of a deal) as they have one of the best History Programs in the nation among public colleges.--[[user:White Shadows|<font style="color:#191970">'''White Shadows'''</font>]] <sup>[[user talk:White Shadows|<font style="color:#DC143C">'''Stuck in square one'''</font>]]</sup> 01:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

276447 +++$+++ 209.155.146.2 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276447 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-13 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.234514520E09 +++$+++ Why do you keep adding an \"Upgrades\" section to  the article (especially [ http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Windows_7_editions&diff=270335174&oldid=269685584 this one])? It is too early to talk about upgrades to Windows 7 and your references are just bogus. I will keep deleting it until it is made official.[[Special:Contributions\/209.155.146.2|209.155.146.2]] ( +++$+++ Why do you keep adding an "Upgrades" section to  the article (especially [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Windows_7_editions&diff=270335174&oldid=269685584 this one])? It is too early to talk about upgrades to Windows 7 and your references are just bogus. I will keep deleting it until it is made official.[[Special:Contributions/209.155.146.2|209.155.146.2]] ([[User talk:209.155.146.2|talk]]) 00:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
276448 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276447 +++$+++ 276447 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.234517760E09 +++$+++ What's bogus about the source?  Many tech sites are using it.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : What's bogus about the source?  Many tech sites are using it.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 01:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
276449 +++$+++ 209.155.146.2 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276447 +++$+++ 276448 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.234596840E09 +++$+++ I consider any source that is not accompanied by an official Microsoft source bogus. And it is still too early to talk about that. Clean install for XP-I don't think so.[[Special:Contributions\/209.155.146.2|209.155.146.2]] ( +++$+++ ::I consider any source that is not accompanied by an official Microsoft source bogus. And it is still too early to talk about that. Clean install for XP-I don't think so.[[Special:Contributions/209.155.146.2|209.155.146.2]] ([[User talk:209.155.146.2|talk]]) 23:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
276450 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276447 +++$+++ 276449 +++$+++ 2009-02-14 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.234604100E09 +++$+++ As for the clean install part, well, Vista only supported direct upgrades from XP, not 2000, so it's not out of the realm of possibility that they'll only support direct-upgrading from Vista.  The Register contacted Microsoft on the topic of XP -> 7 upgrades, and they responded with ''\u201cI can confirm that customers will be able to purchase upgrade media and an upgrade license to move from Windows XP to Windows 7 - however, they will need to do a clean installation of Windows 7, ..... This requires the user to back up their data, install Windows 7, re-install the programs and restore their data. For PCs running Windows Vista customers have the option of an in-place upgrade of Windows 7 keeping their data and programs intact or to perform a clean install of Windows 7.\u201d[http:\/\/www.channelregister.co.uk\/2009\/02\/05\/windows_xp_7_vista_upgrade\/]  So.... that's that.  If Microsoft announces something different in the future, then we can amend the article.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ :::As for the clean install part, well, Vista only supported direct upgrades from XP, not 2000, so it's not out of the realm of possibility that they'll only support direct-upgrading from Vista.  The Register contacted Microsoft on the topic of XP -> 7 upgrades, and they responded with ''“I can confirm that customers will be able to purchase upgrade media and an upgrade license to move from Windows XP to Windows 7 - however, they will need to do a clean installation of Windows 7, ..... This requires the user to back up their data, install Windows 7, re-install the programs and restore their data. For PCs running Windows Vista customers have the option of an in-place upgrade of Windows 7 keeping their data and programs intact or to perform a clean install of Windows 7.”[http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2009/02/05/windows_xp_7_vista_upgrade/]  So.... that's that.  If Microsoft announces something different in the future, then we can amend the article.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 01:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
276451 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276447 +++$+++ 276447 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.234687980E09 +++$+++ [[User:Illegal Operation]] did the most recent one.  I'll leave him a note.... good catch!  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : [[User:Illegal Operation]] did the most recent one.  I'll leave him a note.... good catch!  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 00:53, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

538594 +++$+++  +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538594 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-17 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.263770760E09 +++$+++ [[Template:NCAATeamSeason]] is causing me problems at [[2008\u201309 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team]] where I need to pipe Hamburg. Please advise on what to do.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ [[Template:NCAATeamSeason]] is causing me problems at [[2008–09 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team]] where I need to pipe Hamburg. Please advise on what to do.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 15:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
538595 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538594 +++$+++ 538594 +++$+++ 2010-01-17 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.263775920E09 +++$+++ What is Hamburg? I don't see any use of it on the template. Please give more detail on where this issue is.\u2014 +++$+++ :What is Hamburg? I don't see any use of it on the template. Please give more detail on where this issue is.—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 16:52, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

538596 +++$+++ NThomas +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-04 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.262677740E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your review of [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/List of Texas Tech Red Raiders men's basketball seasons\/archive1]]. I've replied to your comments on its FLC archive page. I appreciate the comments and suggestions!  +++$+++ Thanks again for your review of [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Texas Tech Red Raiders men's basketball seasons/archive1]]. I've replied to your comments on its FLC archive page. I appreciate the comments and suggestions! [[User:NThomas|NThomas]] ([[User talk:NThomas|talk]]) 23:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
538597 +++$+++ NThomas +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538596 +++$+++ 538596 +++$+++ 2010-01-13 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.263381540E09 +++$+++ All of the redlinks have been taken care of. I'd really appreciate your additional comments\/support in getting [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/List of Texas Tech Red Raiders men's basketball seasons\/archive1|this list passed]]. Thanks!  +++$+++ :All of the redlinks have been taken care of. I'd really appreciate your additional comments/support in getting [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Texas Tech Red Raiders men's basketball seasons/archive1|this list passed]]. Thanks! [[User:NThomas|NThomas]] ([[User talk:NThomas|talk]]) 03:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
538598 +++$+++ NThomas +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538596 +++$+++ 538596 +++$+++ 2010-01-13 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.263438060E09 +++$+++ Another reply.  +++$+++ :Another reply. [[User:NThomas|NThomas]] ([[User talk:NThomas|talk]]) 19:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
538599 +++$+++ NThomas +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538596 +++$+++ 538596 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.263997860E09 +++$+++ When you get the chance, if you feel that your comments about the ''In progress'' column have been addressed, would you mind capping them please? Thanks!  +++$+++ :When you get the chance, if you feel that your comments about the ''In progress'' column have been addressed, would you mind capping them please? Thanks! [[User:NThomas|NThomas]] ([[User talk:NThomas|talk]]) 06:31, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

14311 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14311 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-13 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.307971500E09 +++$+++ {{od}} I think I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=SMS_Zr%C3%ADnyi&action=historysubmit&diff=434011002&oldid=433973600 fixed it] for you. :-) I'd go to South Carolina if it isn't that different &ndash; I dunno how much you realize it now (I didn't, in my senior year of HS), but money turns out to be a ''big'' factor. It kind of sucks. :P I might be going to grad school at East Carolina for their maritime studies grad program...  +++$+++ {{od}} I think I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SMS_Zr%C3%ADnyi&action=historysubmit&diff=434011002&oldid=433973600 fixed it] for you. :-) I'd go to South Carolina if it isn't that different &ndash; I dunno how much you realize it now (I didn't, in my senior year of HS), but money turns out to be a ''big'' factor. It kind of sucks. :P I might be going to grad school at East Carolina for their maritime studies grad program... [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:25, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
14312 +++$+++ White Shadows +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14311 +++$+++ 14311 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.308017100E09 +++$+++ You do make a point. I will likely go there for my Bachelor's degree. Anyway, in other news, thanks for fixing the citation. I found [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=SMS_Zr%C3%ADnyi&curid=187834&diff=434011002&oldid=433973600 this edit] especially funny! Now all that's left if I'm not mistaken (which I usually am), is fixing the issue regarding citations and footnotes. The first footnote, while correct, is technically original research. There is no source that I know of that states that while Zrinyi was launched after HMS Dreadnought, she is still a pre-Dreadnought battleship. Is it acceptable to remove the citation altogether? By reading the article, one would know that Zrinyi is a PD and that she was launched in 1910...-- +++$+++ :You do make a point. I will likely go there for my Bachelor's degree. Anyway, in other news, thanks for fixing the citation. I found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SMS_Zr%C3%ADnyi&curid=187834&diff=434011002&oldid=433973600 this edit] especially funny! Now all that's left if I'm not mistaken (which I usually am), is fixing the issue regarding citations and footnotes. The first footnote, while correct, is technically original research. There is no source that I know of that states that while Zrinyi was launched after HMS Dreadnought, she is still a pre-Dreadnought battleship. Is it acceptable to remove the citation altogether? By reading the article, one would know that Zrinyi is a PD and that she was launched in 1910...--[[user:White Shadows|<font style="color:#191970">'''White Shadows'''</font>]] <sup>[[user talk:White Shadows|<font style="color:#DC143C">'''Stuck in square one'''</font>]]</sup> 19:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

14313 +++$+++ White Shadows +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14313 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-15 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308122520E09 +++$+++ To be totally honest, I really do not know how to go about fixing this. I don't quite understand the first one, <s>and I cannot find anything about the second.<\/s>-- +++$+++ To be totally honest, I really do not know how to go about fixing this. I don't quite understand the first one, <s>and I cannot find anything about the second.</s>--[[user:White Shadows|<font style="color:#191970">'''White Shadows'''</font>]] <sup>[[user talk:White Shadows|<font style="color:#DC143C">'''Stuck in square one'''</font>]]</sup> 00:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
14314 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14313 +++$+++ 14313 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.308195480E09 +++$+++ Re footnote, it's your choice but I think I did the same thing [[Minas_Geraes-class_battleship#cite_note-50|here]] (note N9). The engines powered propellers that could drive the ship through the water at a maximum of 20.5 knots (38.0 km\/h; 23.6 mph). That's a little thing I picked up over time. :-) In [[Minas Geraes-class battleship]], I used the sentence \"Eighteen boilers provided power to the engines, which in turn rotated the two three-bladed propellers with 23,500 shaft horsepower.\"  +++$+++ :Re footnote, it's your choice but I think I did the same thing [[Minas_Geraes-class_battleship#cite_note-50|here]] (note N9). The engines powered propellers that could drive the ship through the water at a maximum of 20.5 knots (38.0 km/h; 23.6 mph). That's a little thing I picked up over time. :-) In [[Minas Geraes-class battleship]], I used the sentence "Eighteen boilers provided power to the engines, which in turn rotated the two three-bladed propellers with 23,500 shaft horsepower." [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 20:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

14315 +++$+++ Jsfouche +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-07 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.307438280E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to take a minute to thank you very much for supporting me in my recent RfA.  Even though it was unsuccessful, I appreciate your trust.  With much gratitude, <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ I just wanted to take a minute to thank you very much for supporting me in my recent RfA.  Even though it was unsuccessful, I appreciate your trust.  With much gratitude, <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Jsfouche|<span style="background:#191970;color:#FF8C00;padding:0 4px">jsfouche &#9789;&#9790;</span>]][[User talk:Jsfouche|<font color="navy"></font>Talk]]</font> 02:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
14316 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14315 +++$+++ 14315 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.307704440E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome &ndash; good luck in any future attempts. I'm sure you'll pass then.  +++$+++ :You are very welcome &ndash; good luck in any future attempts. I'm sure you'll pass then. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 04:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

14317 +++$+++ Marcd30319 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14317 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-08 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.307562780E09 +++$+++ The above image used in [[Operation Strikeback]] is a candidate for speedy deletion. +++$+++ The above image used in [[Operation Strikeback]] is a candidate for speedy deletion.[[User:Marcd30319|Marcd30319]] ([[User talk:Marcd30319|talk]]) 12:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
14318 +++$+++ Marcd30319 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14317 +++$+++ 14317 +++$+++ 2011-06-09 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.307651220E09 +++$+++ Never mind, Ed17.  The photo has been deleted without even the courtesy of discussion.   Talk about speedy!  +++$+++ :Never mind, Ed17.  The photo has been deleted without even the courtesy of discussion.   Talk about speedy! [[User:Marcd30319|Marcd30319]] ([[User talk:Marcd30319|talk]]) 13:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
14319 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14317 +++$+++ 14318 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.307704440E09 +++$+++ Hi Marc, hope you're still doing well! Speedy deletions are for uncontroversial calls and are assumed to not need discussion. In this case, the image wasn't necessarily in the public domain &ndash; as the nominator put it: \"Stars and Stripes is only partially funded by the DoD - their website [http:\/\/www.stripes.com\/customer-service\/about-us says] \"Stories and photos by Stars and Stripes staffers are copyrighted, and may not be reprinted or used without permission.\"\" He appears to be correct in this assessment, although not under [[WP:CSD#G12|G12]] but [[WP:CSD#F9|F9]]. Apologies! Do you know of\/can you find any other images that would have been taken by a federal government employee?  +++$+++ ::Hi Marc, hope you're still doing well! Speedy deletions are for uncontroversial calls and are assumed to not need discussion. In this case, the image wasn't necessarily in the public domain &ndash; as the nominator put it: "Stars and Stripes is only partially funded by the DoD - their website [http://www.stripes.com/customer-service/about-us says] "Stories and photos by Stars and Stripes staffers are copyrighted, and may not be reprinted or used without permission."" He appears to be correct in this assessment, although not under [[WP:CSD#G12|G12]] but [[WP:CSD#F9|F9]]. Apologies! Do you know of/can you find any other images that would have been taken by a federal government employee? [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 04:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

276462 +++$+++ Badmintonhist +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-08 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.236565800E09 +++$+++ Warren, if we were creating Olbermann articles in a vacuum, then what you're saying on the Olbermann talk page would have some merit. However, we are not creating them in a vacuum. Take a look, for example, take a ''good, honest'' look, at what passes for controversy in the [[Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator)]] article. All ''seventeen'' of them are proverbial tempests in teapots, largely manufactured, and of interest to a limited number of political junkies. By that standard Olbermann has been involved in a number of controversies, disputes, conflicts, what have you. The last of the so-called disputes listed in the O'Reilly article is his likening of Helen Thomas to a witch. Did that create more controversy than all of Olbermann's thousands of \"worst persons\" awards including those to Tony Snow who was fighting a losing battle for his life? Regards  +++$+++ Warren, if we were creating Olbermann articles in a vacuum, then what you're saying on the Olbermann talk page would have some merit. However, we are not creating them in a vacuum. Take a look, for example, take a ''good, honest'' look, at what passes for controversy in the [[Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator)]] article. All ''seventeen'' of them are proverbial tempests in teapots, largely manufactured, and of interest to a limited number of political junkies. By that standard Olbermann has been involved in a number of controversies, disputes, conflicts, what have you. The last of the so-called disputes listed in the O'Reilly article is his likening of Helen Thomas to a witch. Did that create more controversy than all of Olbermann's thousands of "worst persons" awards including those to Tony Snow who was fighting a losing battle for his life? Regards [[User:Badmintonhist|Badmintonhist]] ([[User talk:Badmintonhist|talk]]) 19:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
276463 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276462 +++$+++ 276462 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.236591300E09 +++$+++ Personally, I think that Bill O'Reilly article should be split into two articles, one covering criticism (from Olbermann, Franken, Hart, etc.etc.), and another covering notable controversies.  But I'm not really all that interested in working on that; there's too much tension involving that topic and I have plenty of that to keep me busy in computing articles.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Personally, I think that Bill O'Reilly article should be split into two articles, one covering criticism (from Olbermann, Franken, Hart, etc.etc.), and another covering notable controversies.  But I'm not really all that interested in working on that; there's too much tension involving that topic and I have plenty of that to keep me busy in computing articles.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 02:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
276464 +++$+++ Blaxthos +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276462 +++$+++ 276463 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.236711720E09 +++$+++ Actually, there originally were two articles, but a few years ago they were merged after a long discussion.  By the way, your response [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AKeith_Olbermann&diff=276208724&oldid=276144629 here] is excellent!  \/\/ +++$+++ ::Actually, there originally were two articles, but a few years ago they were merged after a long discussion.  By the way, your response [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AKeith_Olbermann&diff=276208724&oldid=276144629 here] is excellent!  //[[USER:Blaxthos|Blaxthos]] <small>( [[User Talk:Blaxthos|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Blaxthos|c]] )</small> 12:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
276465 +++$+++ Badmintonhist +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276462 +++$+++ 276463 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.236777180E09 +++$+++ Since we're getting pretty far off the basic topic of what should or should not be included in the Olbermann article, I'm putting this on your talk page. I don't think that commercial success per se, even in the realm of ideas, makes something \"mainstream\". Savage has done well commercially in a medium, talk radio, that tends to gravitate toward flamboyance and controversy. Howard Stern has done well (but not done good) in that medium, too, but it would be a stretch to call him \"mainstream\". Heavily left-leaning filmmakers such as Michael Moore and Oliver Stone have also enjoyed commercial success, but I don't think of them as being mainstream liberals. As for Olby, he's progressively become not so much the liberal version of O'Reilly (who, by comparison, was vastly more even-handed than Olbermann during the last election cycle), but the liberal version of Ann Coulter, expressing vituperative contempt for anyone on the other side of the political divide. But Coulter, at least, is willing to mix it up, face to face, with her political opponents. Olbermann flat out isn't, which is another of his less than appealing traits.  +++$+++ ::Since we're getting pretty far off the basic topic of what should or should not be included in the Olbermann article, I'm putting this on your talk page. I don't think that commercial success per se, even in the realm of ideas, makes something "mainstream". Savage has done well commercially in a medium, talk radio, that tends to gravitate toward flamboyance and controversy. Howard Stern has done well (but not done good) in that medium, too, but it would be a stretch to call him "mainstream". Heavily left-leaning filmmakers such as Michael Moore and Oliver Stone have also enjoyed commercial success, but I don't think of them as being mainstream liberals. As for Olby, he's progressively become not so much the liberal version of O'Reilly (who, by comparison, was vastly more even-handed than Olbermann during the last election cycle), but the liberal version of Ann Coulter, expressing vituperative contempt for anyone on the other side of the political divide. But Coulter, at least, is willing to mix it up, face to face, with her political opponents. Olbermann flat out isn't, which is another of his less than appealing traits. [[User:Badmintonhist|Badmintonhist]] ([[User talk:Badmintonhist|talk]]) 06:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

538607 +++$+++ Ryan2845 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538607 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-11 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.265945520E09 +++$+++ Just FYI, i've started on the Kansas coaches list here [[User:Ryan2845\/coaches#Coaches]]. Just figured i'd let you know so you don't start a duplicate (although i'm sure Kansas was probably last on the priority list lol).  +++$+++ Just FYI, i've started on the Kansas coaches list here [[User:Ryan2845/coaches#Coaches]]. Just figured i'd let you know so you don't start a duplicate (although i'm sure Kansas was probably last on the priority list lol). [[User:Ryan2845|Ryan2845]] ([[User talk:Ryan2845|talk]]) 19:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
538608 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538607 +++$+++ 538607 +++$+++ 2010-02-11 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.265945700E09 +++$+++ Great! Thanks for letting me know. Also, take a look at the three lists currently up at FLC. There have been some changes since I created the template. Otherwise, feel free to ask me to give it a once over before you submit it to FLC and I'll give you some feedback.\u2014 +++$+++ :Great! Thanks for letting me know. Also, take a look at the three lists currently up at FLC. There have been some changes since I created the template. Otherwise, feel free to ask me to give it a once over before you submit it to FLC and I'll give you some feedback.—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 19:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
538609 +++$+++ Ryan2845 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538607 +++$+++ 538608 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.266043080E09 +++$+++ One question I did have was the rules for marking Hall of Famers. Are you marking only those that went into the Hall as coaches? Only those that went in as members of the school that the list is for? Or just marking them all no matter what? I ask because KU has had 4 people coach that are in the Hall, but none went in specifically as KU coach, and some are in as players not coaches.  +++$+++ ::One question I did have was the rules for marking Hall of Famers. Are you marking only those that went into the Hall as coaches? Only those that went in as members of the school that the list is for? Or just marking them all no matter what? I ask because KU has had 4 people coach that are in the Hall, but none went in specifically as KU coach, and some are in as players not coaches. [[User:Ryan2845|Ryan2845]] ([[User talk:Ryan2845|talk]]) 22:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
538610 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538607 +++$+++ 538609 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.266069600E09 +++$+++ I have been doing all that have been inducted as coaches.\u2014 +++$+++ :::I have been doing all that have been inducted as coaches.—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]&bull;[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 06:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

14320 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.307862240E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 00:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14321 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14320 +++$+++ 14320 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.307876160E09 +++$+++ Congrats on yet another DYK entry. Shame you couldn't get it in a day sooner\u2014June 11 is Navy Day in Brazil, you know ;)  +++$+++ :Congrats on yet another DYK entry. Shame you couldn't get it in a day sooner—June 11 is Navy Day in Brazil, you know ;) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 03:56, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14322 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14320 +++$+++ 14321 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.307877180E09 +++$+++ Thanks muchly. I suppose I could have asked for the 11th, but it's too late now. :-) Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Brazilian_battleship_Minas_Geraes&curid=21543991&diff=433827501&oldid=433779325], would you like to fix the translation at [[Tenente revolts]] then? I'm pretty sure that's where I copied it from...  +++$+++ ::Thanks muchly. I suppose I could have asked for the 11th, but it's too late now. :-) Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brazilian_battleship_Minas_Geraes&curid=21543991&diff=433827501&oldid=433779325], would you like to fix the translation at [[Tenente revolts]] then? I'm pretty sure that's where I copied it from... [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 04:13, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14323 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14320 +++$+++ 14322 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.307926020E09 +++$+++ Sure.  +++$+++ :::Sure. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 17:47, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14324 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14320 +++$+++ 14323 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.307940300E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ ::::Thanks! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 21:45, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

276466 +++$+++ Reisio +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276466 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-19 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.237523400E09 +++$+++ Just FFR, do please try to avoid outright deletion of named refs that are likely relied upon elsewhere in an article, as happened in <span class=\"plainlinks\">[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Internet_Explorer_8&diff=278336617&oldid=278331631 this edit]<\/span>.  Already fixed it, so just FYI. :) \xa6  +++$+++ Just FFR, do please try to avoid outright deletion of named refs that are likely relied upon elsewhere in an article, as happened in <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Internet_Explorer_8&diff=278336617&oldid=278331631 this edit]</span>.  Already fixed it, so just FYI. :) ¦ [[User:Reisio|Reisio]] ([[User talk:Reisio|talk]]) 21:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
276467 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276466 +++$+++ 276466 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.237719660E09 +++$+++ While I'm sure you were believing yourself to be helpful in suggesting I don't remove references that are used multiple times in the article, surely you appreciate that the link no longer actually contained the information that was being used as a source?  Or did you not check this before filing your complaint on my talk page?  No, it's okay, you don't need to answer that.  We both know you didn't, given that you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Internet_Explorer_8&diff=278408060&oldid=278401967 re-added the link] in spite of it quite clearly NOT CONTAINING THE INFORMATION contained in the article.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ :While I'm sure you were believing yourself to be helpful in suggesting I don't remove references that are used multiple times in the article, surely you appreciate that the link no longer actually contained the information that was being used as a source?  Or did you not check this before filing your complaint on my talk page?  No, it's okay, you don't need to answer that.  We both know you didn't, given that you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Internet_Explorer_8&diff=278408060&oldid=278401967 re-added the link] in spite of it quite clearly NOT CONTAINING THE INFORMATION contained in the article.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 04:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

538611 +++$+++ DUKyleXY +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-12 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.266042840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:DUKyleXY|DUKyleXY]] ([[User talk:DUKyleXY|talk]]) 22:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
538612 +++$+++ NThomas +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538611 +++$+++ 538611 +++$+++ 2010-02-24 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.267007040E09 +++$+++ Since that '''Oppose'' vote came up, I have a feeling this won't pass FL and be merged into [[Texas Tech Red Raiders men's basketball]]. I appreciate your review but I feel that any revisions would be in vein if it were to be merged. My whole goal was to get as many Texas Tech lists to FL as possible using existing FLs as templates (ex: your Sooners in the NFL Draft, coaches lists, seasons lists, buildings lists, alumni, presidents, etc). I kinda have no motivation to keep this up if every list after this one is shot down because of size. In that case, there are probably only two lists I could finish. Be careful with your Big 12 football coaches topic because if my nomination is denied on size, your lists are similar in size and they might end up being brought up for reassessment.  +++$+++ *Since that '''Oppose'' vote came up, I have a feeling this won't pass FL and be merged into [[Texas Tech Red Raiders men's basketball]]. I appreciate your review but I feel that any revisions would be in vein if it were to be merged. My whole goal was to get as many Texas Tech lists to FL as possible using existing FLs as templates (ex: your Sooners in the NFL Draft, coaches lists, seasons lists, buildings lists, alumni, presidents, etc). I kinda have no motivation to keep this up if every list after this one is shot down because of size. In that case, there are probably only two lists I could finish. Be careful with your Big 12 football coaches topic because if my nomination is denied on size, your lists are similar in size and they might end up being brought up for reassessment. [[User:NThomas|NThomas]] ([[User talk:NThomas|talk]]) 02:24, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
538613 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538611 +++$+++ 538612 +++$+++ 2010-02-24 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.267007640E09 +++$+++ Again, have you thought of adding the women coaches to the list?\u2014 +++$+++ **Again, have you thought of adding the women coaches to the list?—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]•[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 02:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
538614 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538611 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-24 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.267009320E09 +++$+++ I think it helped my Oklahoma list. Won't hurt. A women's list can't stand on its own.\u2014 +++$+++ ****I think it helped my Oklahoma list. Won't hurt. A women's list can't stand on its own.—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]•[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 03:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
538615 +++$+++ NThomas +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538611 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-24 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.267010040E09 +++$+++ Apparently a men's list can't stand on its own either... haha I've got a couple questions for how to add the women's list to it so check on the FL discussion.  +++$+++ *****Apparently a men's list can't stand on its own either... haha I've got a couple questions for how to add the women's list to it so check on the FL discussion. [[User:NThomas|NThomas]] ([[User talk:NThomas|talk]]) 03:14, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
538616 +++$+++ NThomas +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538611 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-25 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.267147680E09 +++$+++ Yep, just saved the revisions  +++$+++ ******Yep, just saved the revisions [[User:NThomas|NThomas]] ([[User talk:NThomas|talk]]) 17:28, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

14325 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14325 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.307863440E09 +++$+++ Hey, Ed, what is left to have [[South American dreadnought race]] nominated for Featured article? -- +++$+++ Hey, Ed, what is left to have [[South American dreadnought race]] nominated for Featured article? --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 00:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14326 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14325 +++$+++ 14325 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.307868300E09 +++$+++ Lecen! I hope you're still well, and I'm glad to see you back. Right now the article is going through a [[WP:MILHIST|Milhist]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Assessment\/South American dreadnought race|A-class review]], and I will probably nominate it at FAC soon after it passes (assuming it does). What are you working on?  +++$+++ :Lecen! I hope you're still well, and I'm glad to see you back. Right now the article is going through a [[WP:MILHIST|Milhist]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/South American dreadnought race|A-class review]], and I will probably nominate it at FAC soon after it passes (assuming it does). What are you working on? [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 01:45, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14327 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14325 +++$+++ 14326 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.307868600E09 +++$+++ Got tired of those royals' articles and now I'm trying to come back by writing about Brazil's greatest soldier: [[Lu\xeds Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias]]. I don't have good quality books about that dreadnought race, but only a few magazine articles, as you know. However, I'm going after a decent photo of the Baron of Rio Branco that may be added to the article. -- +++$+++ ::Got tired of those royals' articles and now I'm trying to come back by writing about Brazil's greatest soldier: [[Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias]]. I don't have good quality books about that dreadnought race, but only a few magazine articles, as you know. However, I'm going after a decent photo of the Baron of Rio Branco that may be added to the article. --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 01:50, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14328 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14325 +++$+++ 14327 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.307869440E09 +++$+++ That one is looking good so far &ndash; nice work! I don't have any good books for you either, although I can tell you that the companion volume to [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=0qXzV3P-iiYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=latin+america%27s+wars&hl=en&ei=9x30Tfa0KoX4gAfo9J3nCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false ''Latin America's Wars''] was pretty good, so the 1791&ndash;1899 volume might help you a bit. If you find any more journal articles, feel free to send them my way. ;-) Do you have [[Jstor]]? I found a couple good journal articles that may interest you. Good luck with the photo, and thanks!  +++$+++ :::That one is looking good so far &ndash; nice work! I don't have any good books for you either, although I can tell you that the companion volume to [http://books.google.com/books?id=0qXzV3P-iiYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=latin+america%27s+wars&hl=en&ei=9x30Tfa0KoX4gAfo9J3nCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false ''Latin America's Wars''] was pretty good, so the 1791&ndash;1899 volume might help you a bit. If you find any more journal articles, feel free to send them my way. ;-) Do you have [[Jstor]]? I found a couple good journal articles that may interest you. Good luck with the photo, and thanks! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 02:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14329 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14325 +++$+++ 14328 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.308196140E09 +++$+++ Yes! Please, send them to me! -- +++$+++ ::::Yes! Please, send them to me! --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 20:49, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

276471 +++$+++ GraYoshi2x +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-26 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.240795320E09 +++$+++ Attacking me with profanity and threats isn't going to fix anything. What makes you think we need such intricate detail on an article which should include a main summary of everything about Vista? Re-add the information on the sub-articles; that's what they're made for. Stay civil. ''''' +++$+++ Attacking me with profanity and threats isn't going to fix anything. What makes you think we need such intricate detail on an article which should include a main summary of everything about Vista? Re-add the information on the sub-articles; that's what they're made for. Stay civil. '''''[[User:GraYoshi2x|<font color="#006600">GraYoshi2x►</font>]]'''''<sup>[[User talk:GraYoshi2x|talk]]</sup> 18:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
276472 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276471 +++$+++ 276471 +++$+++ 2009-04-26 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.240809120E09 +++$+++ The information you're removing isn't \"intricate detail\"; it's still a very high-level overview compared with the full story.  Perhaps you don't have a full appreciation of this yet, but Windows Vista is a positively ''massive'' subject -- the operating system has over 1,000 new features.  That's why there are over ''fifty articles'' in [[:Category:Windows Vista]]; it's why we have ''six'' articles just devoted to its new features, whereas [[Mac OS X v10.5]] hasn't even merited ''one'' such article.  You can't just come along and saw off large segment of the summarization of those six articles just because you don't have the necessary insight into the operating system to do the job right.  And don't you fucking lecture me on civility -- you're the one engaging in destruction of the encyclopedia and of the hard work of others; you should fully expect push-back on such unhelpful behaviour.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : The information you're removing isn't "intricate detail"; it's still a very high-level overview compared with the full story.  Perhaps you don't have a full appreciation of this yet, but Windows Vista is a positively ''massive'' subject -- the operating system has over 1,000 new features.  That's why there are over ''fifty articles'' in [[:Category:Windows Vista]]; it's why we have ''six'' articles just devoted to its new features, whereas [[Mac OS X v10.5]] hasn't even merited ''one'' such article.  You can't just come along and saw off large segment of the summarization of those six articles just because you don't have the necessary insight into the operating system to do the job right.  And don't you fucking lecture me on civility -- you're the one engaging in destruction of the encyclopedia and of the hard work of others; you should fully expect push-back on such unhelpful behaviour.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 22:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
276473 +++$+++ GraYoshi2x +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276471 +++$+++ 276472 +++$+++ 2009-04-26 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.240812660E09 +++$+++ Look, I try to discuss with you and you call my edits [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:R3ap3R.inc#Windows_Vista vandalism] and then tell me to basically go screw myself? You should know very well that you don't own the encyclopedia and you don't randomly insult others because you disagree with their edits. It's immature at best. I'm honestly surprised you haven't been warned yet for this behavior, considering your past discussions. ''''' +++$+++ ::Look, I try to discuss with you and you call my edits [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:R3ap3R.inc#Windows_Vista vandalism] and then tell me to basically go screw myself? You should know very well that you don't own the encyclopedia and you don't randomly insult others because you disagree with their edits. It's immature at best. I'm honestly surprised you haven't been warned yet for this behavior, considering your past discussions. '''''[[User:GraYoshi2x|<font color="#006600">GraYoshi2x►</font>]]'''''<sup>[[User talk:GraYoshi2x|talk]]</sup> 23:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
276474 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276471 +++$+++ 276473 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.240883760E09 +++$+++ Boo-hoo-hoo!  How about you stop trying to damage the encyclopedia; my attitude towards you will improve considerably and immediately. <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ :::Boo-hoo-hoo!  How about you stop trying to damage the encyclopedia; my attitude towards you will improve considerably and immediately. <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 18:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
276475 +++$+++ GraYoshi2x +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276471 +++$+++ 276474 +++$+++ 2009-04-28 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.240982880E09 +++$+++ I'll take this to Wikiquette alerts if you don't stop acting this way. Immature behavior that you use on places like forums aren't allowed here. ''''' +++$+++ ::::I'll take this to Wikiquette alerts if you don't stop acting this way. Immature behavior that you use on places like forums aren't allowed here. '''''[[User:GraYoshi2x|<font color="#006600">GraYoshi2x►</font>]]'''''<sup>[[User talk:GraYoshi2x|talk]]</sup> 22:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

538617 +++$+++ H1nkles +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-25 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.267149600E09 +++$+++ I have done a GA Reassessment of the [[Oklahoma Sooners football]] article as part of the GA Sweeps project.  My review is [[Talk:Oklahoma Sooners football\/GA1|here]].  I have found problems with the article that will require work to maintain its GA status.  I have placed the article on hold and I am notifying all interested editors and projects.  If you have any questions or concerns please contact me on my talk page.   +++$+++ I have done a GA Reassessment of the [[Oklahoma Sooners football]] article as part of the GA Sweeps project.  My review is [[Talk:Oklahoma Sooners football/GA1|here]].  I have found problems with the article that will require work to maintain its GA status.  I have placed the article on hold and I am notifying all interested editors and projects.  If you have any questions or concerns please contact me on my talk page.  [[User:H1nkles|H1nkles]] ([[User talk:H1nkles|talk]]) 18:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
538618 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538617 +++$+++ 538617 +++$+++ 2010-02-25 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.267167180E09 +++$+++ Your welcome. Feel free to review it!\u2014 +++$+++ :Your welcome. Feel free to review it!—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]•[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 22:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

14330 +++$+++ Strange Passerby +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.307871120E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:In_the_news\/Candidates&curid=1470141&diff=433817784&oldid=433816699 Not a major surprise]. As you've not commented on the discussion, perhaps you should close it instead.  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates&curid=1470141&diff=433817784&oldid=433816699 Not a major surprise]. As you've not commented on the discussion, perhaps you should close it instead. [[User:Strange Passerby|Strange Passerby]] ([[User talk:Strange Passerby|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Strange Passerby|cont]]) 02:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14331 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14330 +++$+++ 14330 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.307871780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note. I restored the {archive} tags. It was a completely unproductive discussion &ndash; no consensus will result from the discussion, and the race has started anyway.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the note. I restored the {archive} tags. It was a completely unproductive discussion &ndash; no consensus will result from the discussion, and the race has started anyway. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 02:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14332 +++$+++ MickMacNee +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14330 +++$+++ 14331 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.307872080E09 +++$+++ What a piss take that really is. The final shame of ITN\/C. Losing the argument? Don't want to play anymore? Then take your ball home and archive the discussion! Claim that it is unproductive, even though other people were still discussing right up to that point, and even though if no admin with any sense ever turned up, it would have been moot in 12 hours anyway! Jesus Christ. This fucking site. Unfuckingbelievable.  +++$+++ ::What a piss take that really is. The final shame of ITN/C. Losing the argument? Don't want to play anymore? Then take your ball home and archive the discussion! Claim that it is unproductive, even though other people were still discussing right up to that point, and even though if no admin with any sense ever turned up, it would have been moot in 12 hours anyway! Jesus Christ. This fucking site. Unfuckingbelievable. [[User:MickMacNee|MickMacNee]] ([[User talk:MickMacNee|talk]]) 02:48, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14333 +++$+++ Strange Passerby +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14330 +++$+++ 14332 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.307872260E09 +++$+++ Get a grip and drop the [[WP:stick|stick]].  +++$+++ :::Get a grip and drop the [[WP:stick|stick]]. [[User:Strange Passerby|Strange Passerby]] ([[User talk:Strange Passerby|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Strange Passerby|cont]]) 02:51, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14334 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14330 +++$+++ 14333 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.307872620E09 +++$+++ Losing the argument? I didn't take part in it, and I don't really care about the outcome. All I saw was a good cut-off of unproductive yet contentious and heated discussion, and I complimented Passerby on it. Then you reverted, so I re-reverted. On a related note, Mick, I mean this in the best way possible, but take a short break from the computer... go somewhere quiet and fish, or play some tennis, or do anything that'll get your mind off things. You're really taking some of these discussions way too personally. I mean, is there really a big difference between posting a minor blurb on a website now or twelve hours from now? Does it really matter in the grand scheme of life? Your friend,  +++$+++ ::::Losing the argument? I didn't take part in it, and I don't really care about the outcome. All I saw was a good cut-off of unproductive yet contentious and heated discussion, and I complimented Passerby on it. Then you reverted, so I re-reverted. On a related note, Mick, I mean this in the best way possible, but take a short break from the computer... go somewhere quiet and fish, or play some tennis, or do anything that'll get your mind off things. You're really taking some of these discussions way too personally. I mean, is there really a big difference between posting a minor blurb on a website now or twelve hours from now? Does it really matter in the grand scheme of life? Your friend, [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 02:57, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
14335 +++$+++ MickMacNee +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14330 +++$+++ 14334 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.307874240E09 +++$+++ No big difference at all. It's already well and truly ruined my weekend. You're forgetting of course it won't even go up when it finishes, becuase I'm not going to waste my time on it if I cannot further expose the farce that causes it to appear five hours late when nobody really gives a crap anymore, and 365 apparently takes a week to write the summaries so that's out too, and none of the other ITN opposers really give a shit whether it goes up after either, not enough to do any actual work except to give their 2c of varying degrees of knowledge of ITN or the event, or of anything infact. It's already rewarded Kevin for the disgraceful tactic of torpedoing nominations based on mythical discussions he's never going to start, just for a bit of mindless BURO. It's already ensured SP can do whatever he did today rather than continue his 'if it was updated' stories while I wasted it arguing in a discussion that he was going to ensure never finished anyway. It's rewarded 365 because he's managed to get me reported to ANI for 'though crime' and then fuck off while I have to put up with the likes of RD232 doing his innocent passer by act and the likes of Bjmullen POV pushing on the very same day he acts the victim in there. I shall have to be content with the fact that the point you actually cut it off at, is rather embarassing to the only person who was actually trying to make any serious defence of the opposing argument, in this supposed unimportant issue. So unimportant, it's been emphatically 'won' in one way, but not the other.  +++$+++ :::::No big difference at all. It's already well and truly ruined my weekend. You're forgetting of course it won't even go up when it finishes, becuase I'm not going to waste my time on it if I cannot further expose the farce that causes it to appear five hours late when nobody really gives a crap anymore, and 365 apparently takes a week to write the summaries so that's out too, and none of the other ITN opposers really give a shit whether it goes up after either, not enough to do any actual work except to give their 2c of varying degrees of knowledge of ITN or the event, or of anything infact. It's already rewarded Kevin for the disgraceful tactic of torpedoing nominations based on mythical discussions he's never going to start, just for a bit of mindless BURO. It's already ensured SP can do whatever he did today rather than continue his 'if it was updated' stories while I wasted it arguing in a discussion that he was going to ensure never finished anyway. It's rewarded 365 because he's managed to get me reported to ANI for 'though crime' and then fuck off while I have to put up with the likes of RD232 doing his innocent passer by act and the likes of Bjmullen POV pushing on the very same day he acts the victim in there. I shall have to be content with the fact that the point you actually cut it off at, is rather embarassing to the only person who was actually trying to make any serious defence of the opposing argument, in this supposed unimportant issue. So unimportant, it's been emphatically 'won' in one way, but not the other. [[User:MickMacNee|MickMacNee]] ([[User talk:MickMacNee|talk]]) 03:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

538619 +++$+++ Staxringold +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-01 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.267504740E09 +++$+++ Sortability added as per your request. If you get the chance please give this list a full review (and perhaps it's list-style-sister, [[List of Los Angeles Dodgers first-round draft picks]]).  +++$+++ Sortability added as per your request. If you get the chance please give this list a full review (and perhaps it's list-style-sister, [[List of Los Angeles Dodgers first-round draft picks]]). [[User:Staxringold|Staxringold]] <sub>[[User talk:Staxringold|talk]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[Special:Contributions/Staxringold|contribs]]</span></sup> 20:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
538620 +++$+++ Staxringold +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538619 +++$+++ 538619 +++$+++ 2010-03-01 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.267505520E09 +++$+++ Sorting works for me. :(  +++$+++ *Sorting works for me. :( [[User:Staxringold|Staxringold]] <sub>[[User talk:Staxringold|talk]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[Special:Contributions/Staxringold|contribs]]</span></sup> 20:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
538621 +++$+++ Staxringold +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538619 +++$+++ 538620 +++$+++ 2010-03-01 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.267506420E09 +++$+++ I think KV5 cracked the solution. Should work now.  +++$+++ :*I think KV5 cracked the solution. Should work now. [[User:Staxringold|Staxringold]] <sub>[[User talk:Staxringold|talk]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[Special:Contributions/Staxringold|contribs]]</span></sup> 21:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

276476 +++$+++ R3ap3R.inc +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276476 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-26 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.240809900E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]] according to the reverts you have made on [[Windows Vista]]. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> \u2014  +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]] according to the reverts you have made on [[Windows Vista]]. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> — [[User:R3ap3R.inc|R3ap3R.inc]] ([[User talk:R3ap3R.inc|talk]]) 22:25, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
276477 +++$+++ Chillum +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276476 +++$+++ 276476 +++$+++ 2009-04-26 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.240810020E09 +++$+++ That does not look even close to a 3RR violation.  +++$+++ :That does not look even close to a 3RR violation. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color="Green">'''Chillum'''</font>]] 22:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

276478 +++$+++ Socrates2008 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276478 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-27 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.240846560E09 +++$+++ Would you care to explain how a Windows XP [[virtual machine]] can run under Win7 without a [[hypervisor]]?  Or maybe why [[Microsoft Virtual PC]], which is the core enabling technology, is not a Type-2 hypervisor?  In any event, it would useful if you engaged in the [[Talk:Features new to Windows 7#Windows XP Mode|discussion on the talk page]], rather than trying to start an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]''' over specific details that you have misunderstood and therefore got incorrect in your version of the article. Thank you <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva\"><font color=\"black\"><font size=\"4\">Socrates2008 (<font size=3> +++$+++ Would you care to explain how a Windows XP [[virtual machine]] can run under Win7 without a [[hypervisor]]?  Or maybe why [[Microsoft Virtual PC]], which is the core enabling technology, is not a Type-2 hypervisor?  In any event, it would useful if you engaged in the [[Talk:Features new to Windows 7#Windows XP Mode|discussion on the talk page]], rather than trying to start an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]''' over specific details that you have misunderstood and therefore got incorrect in your version of the article. Thank you <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva"><font color="black"><font size="4">Socrates2008 (<font size=3>[[User talk:Socrates2008|Talk]]</font>)</font></font></font> 08:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
276479 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276478 +++$+++ 276478 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.240883640E09 +++$+++ Definitionally, a hypervisor can run multiple guest operating systems simultaneously.  Windows XP Mode cannot do this.  To this end, no Microsoft sources describe XPM as a hypervisor.  Simple, really.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Definitionally, a hypervisor can run multiple guest operating systems simultaneously.  Windows XP Mode cannot do this.  To this end, no Microsoft sources describe XPM as a hypervisor.  Simple, really.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 18:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
276480 +++$+++ 117.201.112.44 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276478 +++$+++ 276479 +++$+++ 2009-04-29 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.240996620E09 +++$+++ I am sorry, but hypervisor is defined as something that runs multiple operating systems simultaneously, not multiple ''guest'' OSs. Anyways, if you so insist on requiring a source before you understand this simple fact, read http:\/\/blogs.zdnet.com\/microsoft\/?p=2621 --[[Special:Contributions\/117.201.112.44|117.201.112.44]] ( +++$+++ :: I am sorry, but hypervisor is defined as something that runs multiple operating systems simultaneously, not multiple ''guest'' OSs. Anyways, if you so insist on requiring a source before you understand this simple fact, read http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=2621 --[[Special:Contributions/117.201.112.44|117.201.112.44]] ([[User talk:117.201.112.44|talk]]) 02:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
276481 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276478 +++$+++ 276480 +++$+++ 2009-04-29 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.240998120E09 +++$+++ I understand the concepts just fine, thank you -- part of my professional life involves maintaining VMWare ESX servers.  I still maintain that \"Windows XP Mode\", as a feature of Windows 7, is definitionally not a hypervisor as it is not capable of running multiple operating systems at the same time.  It is virtual machine software that makes use of hypervisor-based virtualization, yes, but \"Windows XP Mode\" has one baked-in virtual machine -- it is not intended to do anything else.  Your source actually backs up my point of contention here -- it doesn't describe Windows XP Mode as a hypervisor (because it isn't); it does however, describe Virtual PC as a hypervisor (because it is).  Is the difference clear now? <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ ::: I understand the concepts just fine, thank you -- part of my professional life involves maintaining VMWare ESX servers.  I still maintain that "Windows XP Mode", as a feature of Windows 7, is definitionally not a hypervisor as it is not capable of running multiple operating systems at the same time.  It is virtual machine software that makes use of hypervisor-based virtualization, yes, but "Windows XP Mode" has one baked-in virtual machine -- it is not intended to do anything else.  Your source actually backs up my point of contention here -- it doesn't describe Windows XP Mode as a hypervisor (because it isn't); it does however, describe Virtual PC as a hypervisor (because it is).  Is the difference clear now? <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 02:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
276482 +++$+++ Soumyasch +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276478 +++$+++ 276481 +++$+++ 2009-04-29 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.241004960E09 +++$+++ Sorry for butting in, but I don't think XP Mode is not a feature \"of\" Windows 7. It is just another application that runs on top it, but is not a part of Windows 7. Me thinks. -- +++$+++ :::: Sorry for butting in, but I don't think XP Mode is not a feature "of" Windows 7. It is just another application that runs on top it, but is not a part of Windows 7. Me thinks. --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]]<sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 04:36, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

14336 +++$+++ Leandromartinez +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14336 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-16 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.308234720E09 +++$+++ Don't worry.. :). Thank you by the nice article.  +++$+++ Don't worry.. :). Thank you by the nice article. [[User:Leandromartinez|Leandromartinez]] ([[User talk:Leandromartinez|talk]]) 07:32, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
14337 +++$+++ Leandromartinez +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14336 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-16 09:48:00 +++$+++ 1.308242880E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Well, i think ''Corrida armamentista sul-americana dos encoura\xe7ados'' seems better... The portuguese language it's a ''little crazy'', the grammar, a nightmare. :)  +++$+++ ::Thanks. Well, i think ''Corrida armamentista sul-americana dos encouraçados'' seems better... The portuguese language it's a ''little crazy'', the grammar, a nightmare. :) [[User:Leandromartinez|Leandromartinez]] ([[User talk:Leandromartinez|talk]]) 09:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

538625 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-06 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.270609440E09 +++$+++ Perhaps the easiest way to request IPA is to use the {{tl|Need-IPA}} tag, which will add the page to ''Category:Wikipedia articles with nonstandard pronunciation''.  From there, it's just up to someone to do the heavy lifting.  Or just request it on the relevant ''WP:IPA for XX'' page like you did.  Cheers!  +++$+++ Perhaps the easiest way to request IPA is to use the {{tl|Need-IPA}} tag, which will add the page to ''Category:Wikipedia articles with nonstandard pronunciation''.  From there, it's just up to someone to do the heavy lifting.  Or just request it on the relevant ''WP:IPA for XX'' page like you did.  Cheers! [[User:Xyzzyva|— ˈzɪzɨvə]] ([[User talk:Xyzzyva|talk]]) 20:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
538626 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538625 +++$+++ 538625 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.270609740E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Good to know for the future.\u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks. Good to know for the future.—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]•[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 20:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

14339 +++$+++ Marcd30319 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-17 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.308345240E09 +++$+++ Hi, Ed!  Could you set up the categories for these articles' Talk page?  Thanks! +++$+++ Hi, Ed!  Could you set up the categories for these articles' Talk page?  Thanks![[User:Marcd30319|Marcd30319]] ([[User talk:Marcd30319|talk]]) 14:14, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
14340 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14339 +++$+++ 14339 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.308367860E09 +++$+++ Hi Marc! I'll get to it tonight after work. :-)  +++$+++ :Hi Marc! I'll get to it tonight after work. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 20:31, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
14341 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14339 +++$+++ 14340 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.308412320E09 +++$+++ And it's done!  +++$+++ ::And it's done! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 08:52, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
14342 +++$+++ Marcd30319 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14339 +++$+++ 14341 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.308437760E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Ed!  How about [[Operation Longstep]], too? +++$+++ :::Thanks, Ed!  How about [[Operation Longstep]], too?[[User:Marcd30319|Marcd30319]] ([[User talk:Marcd30319|talk]]) 15:56, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
14343 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14339 +++$+++ 14342 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.308502320E09 +++$+++ Yup, but before I rate it, can you expand on who 'won' and who 'lost'? You say that the Blues landed troops but not what the Greens did about it, if anything. :-)  +++$+++ ::::Yup, but before I rate it, can you expand on who 'won' and who 'lost'? You say that the Blues landed troops but not what the Greens did about it, if anything. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 09:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
14344 +++$+++ Marcd30319 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14339 +++$+++ 14343 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.308511680E09 +++$+++ Done! +++$+++ :::::Done![[User:Marcd30319|Marcd30319]] ([[User talk:Marcd30319|talk]]) 12:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
14345 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14339 +++$+++ 14344 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.308548040E09 +++$+++ Okay, it's assessed!  +++$+++ ::::::Okay, it's assessed! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 22:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

276485 +++$+++ xpclient +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-04 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.241439120E09 +++$+++ \"You're right.  I tried this out with Excel (being an old office person) and of course that doesn't work because Excel isn't quite an MDI application. It is something we removed from Windows 7 deliberately when we introduced the new Taskbar, in particular jumplists, which would not apply to a selection.\" -  +++$+++ "You're right.  I tried this out with Excel (being an old office person) and of course that doesn't work because Excel isn't quite an MDI application. It is something we removed from Windows 7 deliberately when we introduced the new Taskbar, in particular jumplists, which would not apply to a selection." - [[User:xpclient|<small>xpclient</small>]] <sup>[[User talk:xpclient|<small>Talk</small>]]</sup> 05:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
276486 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276485 +++$+++ 276485 +++$+++ 2009-05-04 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.241470680E09 +++$+++ Oh I see what you mean now.  Weird, I never knew about that particular capability.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : Oh I see what you mean now.  Weird, I never knew about that particular capability.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 13:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

538631 +++$+++ NThomas +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538631 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-18 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.271587620E09 +++$+++ I'm working on something on [[Wikipedia: WikiProject College football]], the subsection \"[[Wikipedia:WikiProject_College_football#Structure|Structure]]\" was\/is based on the WP:NFL's structure and is a complete mess over there. Considering how well put together your Big 12 Conference football head coaches pages are, is there anyway you can create something for the College football Wikiproject similar to act as a guide similar to what was [[Wikipedia:WikiProject College football\/Yearly team pages format|done with this]]. Here's where your coaches list guide should go: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject College football\/Head coach lists format]]. I'm working on a few myself. Since this one is your expertise, I felt it was only right you do it.  +++$+++ I'm working on something on [[Wikipedia: WikiProject College football]], the subsection "[[Wikipedia:WikiProject_College_football#Structure|Structure]]" was/is based on the WP:NFL's structure and is a complete mess over there. Considering how well put together your Big 12 Conference football head coaches pages are, is there anyway you can create something for the College football Wikiproject similar to act as a guide similar to what was [[Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Yearly team pages format|done with this]]. Here's where your coaches list guide should go: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Head coach lists format]]. I'm working on a few myself. Since this one is your expertise, I felt it was only right you do it. [[User:NThomas|NThomas]] ([[User talk:NThomas|talk]]) 03:47, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
538632 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538631 +++$+++ 538631 +++$+++ 2010-04-18 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.271631120E09 +++$+++ I created [[Wikipedia:WikiProject College football\/Style Guide\/Head coaches list|this]] awhile back. However, I think it is out-of-date. The requirements for FLC are very fluid and dynamic. Next week, I'll work on updating this style guideline. Honestly, the best style guideline is to just look at the most recent lists that have passed FLC. I have two out there right now.\u2014 +++$+++ :I created [[Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Style Guide/Head coaches list|this]] awhile back. However, I think it is out-of-date. The requirements for FLC are very fluid and dynamic. Next week, I'll work on updating this style guideline. Honestly, the best style guideline is to just look at the most recent lists that have passed FLC. I have two out there right now.—[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px Verdana,sans-serif;">NMajdan</font>]]•[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px Verdana,sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 15:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

276488 +++$+++ One +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-05 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.241530200E09 +++$+++ In addition, http:\/\/news.cnet.com\/Gates-pushes-TV-computers-in-China\/2100-1040_3-222815.html mentions that Venus would've run on a special version of Windows CE.  +++$+++ In addition, http://news.cnet.com/Gates-pushes-TV-computers-in-China/2100-1040_3-222815.html mentions that Venus would've run on a special version of Windows CE. [[User:One|One]] ([[User talk:One|talk]]) 06:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
276489 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276488 +++$+++ 276488 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.241557620E09 +++$+++ That article says that it's a software & hardware solution built on top of Windows CE... in other words, it's not actually an operating system, any more than [[WebTV]] is.  Windows CE is the operating system.  You've disproven your own point.  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : That article says that it's a software & hardware solution built on top of Windows CE... in other words, it's not actually an operating system, any more than [[WebTV]] is.  Windows CE is the operating system.  You've disproven your own point.  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 14:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
276490 +++$+++ One +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276488 +++$+++ 276489 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.241559060E09 +++$+++ Venus was intended to essentially be a set-top version of Windows CE (and from the sounds of another article I've read, it was supposed to be a specialized variant of CE; it's in the references of Venus's article) for low-end Chinese televisions. If that's not enough to be designated a related variant of Windows, then I suppose it's alright.  +++$+++ ::Venus was intended to essentially be a set-top version of Windows CE (and from the sounds of another article I've read, it was supposed to be a specialized variant of CE; it's in the references of Venus's article) for low-end Chinese televisions. If that's not enough to be designated a related variant of Windows, then I suppose it's alright. [[User:One|One]] ([[User talk:One|talk]]) 14:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
276491 +++$+++ One +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276488 +++$+++ 276490 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.241559180E09 +++$+++ On a somewhat-related note, could you think of a Microsoft-related template that Venus could possibly fit in? I'm not trying to be sarcastic, just trying to figure out what it could go well with.  +++$+++ :::On a somewhat-related note, could you think of a Microsoft-related template that Venus could possibly fit in? I'm not trying to be sarcastic, just trying to figure out what it could go well with. [[User:One|One]] ([[User talk:One|talk]]) 14:33, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
276492 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276488 +++$+++ 276491 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.241585460E09 +++$+++ Hmmm.... in the hardware section of [[Template:Microsoft]], I guess? <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ :::: Hmmm.... in the hardware section of [[Template:Microsoft]], I guess? <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 21:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
276493 +++$+++ One +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276488 +++$+++ 276492 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.241586960E09 +++$+++ Okay, I've added it there. Thanks for the suggestion.  +++$+++ :::::Okay, I've added it there. Thanks for the suggestion. [[User:One|One]] ([[User talk:One|talk]]) 22:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

14346 +++$+++ Sturmvogel 66 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-17 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.308368820E09 +++$+++ You may have noticed that I've got somebody trying to delete File:PetlyakovPe-8.jpg for lacking a source, when a source is not required under the NFUR. Can you take a look at this and see if there's anything else I need to do to stop this process?-- +++$+++ You may have noticed that I've got somebody trying to delete File:PetlyakovPe-8.jpg for lacking a source, when a source is not required under the NFUR. Can you take a look at this and see if there's anything else I need to do to stop this process?--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 20:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
14347 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14346 +++$+++ 14346 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.308408180E09 +++$+++ I did. Could you contact a Commons admin to see what the original source was?  +++$+++ :I did. Could you contact a Commons admin to see what the original source was? [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 07:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

14348 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-18 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.308443220E09 +++$+++ What am I supposed to do?! -- +++$+++ What am I supposed to do?! --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 17:27, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
14349 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14348 +++$+++ 14348 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.308454800E09 +++$+++ Hey Lecen, I have work in 25 minutes so I can't respond very well at the moment, but my quick advice is to hold on. If we can get an RfC together and organized, we can let a wider body of editors decide the issue, which can then be enforced in FAC and other places (assuming we can't find a compromise before that). We'll work through this, alright? :-)  +++$+++ :Hey Lecen, I have work in 25 minutes so I can't respond very well at the moment, but my quick advice is to hold on. If we can get an RfC together and organized, we can let a wider body of editors decide the issue, which can then be enforced in FAC and other places (assuming we can't find a compromise before that). We'll work through this, alright? :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 20:40, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
14350 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14348 +++$+++ 14349 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.308467220E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about it. I don't want you to get involved. I'm going to wait for other editors to express their point of view. i just wanted to let you know how arbitrary things are. The good news are that I just bought a book solely about the dreadnought arms race. I'm going to read it and help you out with that article. -- +++$+++ ::Don't worry about it. I don't want you to get involved. I'm going to wait for other editors to express their point of view. i just wanted to let you know how arbitrary things are. The good news are that I just bought a book solely about the dreadnought arms race. I'm going to read it and help you out with that article. --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 00:07, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
14351 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14348 +++$+++ 14350 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.308502200E09 +++$+++ That's mainly what I was going to try and help with &ndash; I did not plan on jumping into the debate and rekindling all the fires!  Unfortunately you will see arbitrary decisions at times because people who have followed the disputes, like me, are considered to be too involved to take any administrator actions. Re arms race, I'd hug you but you're a few too many miles away. ;-) Thanks very much &ndash; I definitely appreciate it.  +++$+++ :::That's mainly what I was going to try and help with &ndash; I did not plan on jumping into the debate and rekindling all the fires!  Unfortunately you will see arbitrary decisions at times because people who have followed the disputes, like me, are considered to be too involved to take any administrator actions. Re arms race, I'd hug you but you're a few too many miles away. ;-) Thanks very much &ndash; I definitely appreciate it. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 09:50, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
14352 +++$+++ DrKiernan +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14348 +++$+++ 14348 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.308582300E09 +++$+++ The detail in the third paragraph of Lecen's post is incorrect. I have already said that I have no problem with alternative names in leads on multiple occasions e.g. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:DrKiernan&diff=423027774&oldid=423009630][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/Princess_Maria_Am%C3%A9lia_of_Brazil\/archive1&diff=422689254&oldid=422679706]. I would like to request that Lecen restricts himself from talking about me on any user talk pages, and I will reciprocate. His misrepresentation of my opinions over multiple pages is unhelpful and divisive.  +++$+++ :The detail in the third paragraph of Lecen's post is incorrect. I have already said that I have no problem with alternative names in leads on multiple occasions e.g. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DrKiernan&diff=423027774&oldid=423009630][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Princess_Maria_Am%C3%A9lia_of_Brazil/archive1&diff=422689254&oldid=422679706]. I would like to request that Lecen restricts himself from talking about me on any user talk pages, and I will reciprocate. His misrepresentation of my opinions over multiple pages is unhelpful and divisive. [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 08:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

177154 +++$+++ DanTD +++$+++ Lost on belmont +++$+++ 177154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-22 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.271983380E09 +++$+++ There have to be more than two [[:Category:Former Chicago, Aurora, and Elgin Stations|former Chicago, Aurora, and Elgin Stations]] out there. Do you know of any others besides the two that are presently categorized? ---- +++$+++ There have to be more than two [[:Category:Former Chicago, Aurora, and Elgin Stations|former Chicago, Aurora, and Elgin Stations]] out there. Do you know of any others besides the two that are presently categorized? ----[[User:DanTD|DanTD]] ([[User talk:DanTD|talk]]) 17:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
177155 +++$+++ Lost on belmont +++$+++ Lost on belmont +++$+++ 177154 +++$+++ 177154 +++$+++ 2010-04-22 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.271987700E09 +++$+++ Also, since you're here, if you look at the [[List of closed Chicago 'L' stations]] you'll see that the stations on the Garfield Park and Westchester lines Central&emdash;25th (inclusive) don't have opening dates. I've left these out for now because all of these stations started off as CA&E stations but later became \"L\" stations and I'm still not sure if this list should give dates based on \"L\" service alone or if it should be service in general.  +++$+++ :Also, since you're here, if you look at the [[List of closed Chicago 'L' stations]] you'll see that the stations on the Garfield Park and Westchester lines Central&emdash;25th (inclusive) don't have opening dates. I've left these out for now because all of these stations started off as CA&E stations but later became "L" stations and I'm still not sure if this list should give dates based on "L" service alone or if it should be service in general. [[User:Lost on belmont|Lost on Belmont]] ([[User talk:Lost on belmont#top|talk]]) 18:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
177156 +++$+++  +++$+++ Lost on belmont +++$+++ 177154 +++$+++ 177155 +++$+++ 2010-04-22 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.271993640E09 +++$+++ Wow. Ardmore and Villa Avenue stations already have images that are on the [[National Register of Historic Places listings in DuPage County, Illinois|DuPage County NRHP list]]. They look like they might be ripe for articles with that category. Maybe I can suggest them for WikiProject NRHP. ----20:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ ::Wow. Ardmore and Villa Avenue stations already have images that are on the [[National Register of Historic Places listings in DuPage County, Illinois|DuPage County NRHP list]]. They look like they might be ripe for articles with that category. Maybe I can suggest them for WikiProject NRHP. ----20:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
177157 +++$+++ DanTD +++$+++ Lost on belmont +++$+++ 177154 +++$+++ 177155 +++$+++ 2010-05-10 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.273543500E09 +++$+++ '''UPDATE''' - Looks like I took you out of two jobs, because I just wrote articles for Ardmore Avenue and Villa Avenue stations today.  Of course, any additional info from those who know the area better is always a good idea. ---- +++$+++ ::'''UPDATE''' - Looks like I took you out of two jobs, because I just wrote articles for Ardmore Avenue and Villa Avenue stations today.  Of course, any additional info from those who know the area better is always a good idea. ----[[User:DanTD|DanTD]] ([[User talk:DanTD|talk]]) 19:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

276494 +++$+++ Tobylnixon +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-07 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.241761020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Tobylnixon|Tobylnixon]] ([[User talk:Tobylnixon|talk]]) 22:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
276495 +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276494 +++$+++ 276494 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.241762700E09 +++$+++ The UPnP Forum web site [http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20011202144542\/http:\/\/www.upnp.org\/about\/default.asp has said this since no later than December 2001].  Somewhere in the history of the Wikipedia article, someone copied that paragraph from your web site, ''verbatim''.  Either you or the web site is wrong.  Which one is it?  <b><span style=\"color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;\">  +++$+++ : The UPnP Forum web site [http://web.archive.org/web/20011202144542/http://www.upnp.org/about/default.asp has said this since no later than December 2001].  Somewhere in the history of the Wikipedia article, someone copied that paragraph from your web site, ''verbatim''.  Either you or the web site is wrong.  Which one is it?  <b><span style="color:#1018ff;font-family:Zapfino,Monotype Corsiva;"> [[User:Warren|Warren]]</span> [[User talk:Warren|-talk-]]</b> 23:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
276496 +++$+++ Tobylnixon +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276494 +++$+++ 276495 +++$+++ 2009-05-08 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.241766600E09 +++$+++ The web site contains some hopeful marketing fluff. Wikipedia pages aren't supposed to be marketing fluff -- I was trying to make the Wikipedia page reflect reality! :-) But since you've pointed this out, I'll see if we can get the Forum web page updated.  +++$+++ ::The web site contains some hopeful marketing fluff. Wikipedia pages aren't supposed to be marketing fluff -- I was trying to make the Wikipedia page reflect reality! :-) But since you've pointed this out, I'll see if we can get the Forum web page updated. [[User:Tobylnixon|Tobylnixon]] ([[User talk:Tobylnixon|talk]]) 00:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

89773 +++$+++ Skotywa +++$+++ EamonnPKeane +++$+++ 89773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-01 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.298977080E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article\/requests\/pending&diff=next&oldid=415088108 added] this article to the [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article\/requests\/pending|pending list]] a few days back. There is an open spot on the '''[[Wikipedia:Today's featured article\/requests|requests page]]''' presently, so right now would be a good time to write up a blurb and nominate it. -- +++$+++ I noticed that you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article/requests/pending&diff=next&oldid=415088108 added] this article to the [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/pending|pending list]] a few days back. There is an open spot on the '''[[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests|requests page]]''' presently, so right now would be a good time to write up a blurb and nominate it. --[[User:Skotywa|SkotyWA]]<sup>''[[User_talk:Skotywa|T]]''</sup><sub style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">''[[Special:Contributions/Skotywa|C]]''</sub> 02:58, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
89774 +++$+++ Skotywa +++$+++ EamonnPKeane +++$+++ 89773 +++$+++ 89773 +++$+++ 2011-03-14 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.300143840E09 +++$+++ There is an open spot again to nominate this article, but you probably only have one or two more days to do it.  If you're still interested, I suggest you submit the nomination now. -- +++$+++ :There is an open spot again to nominate this article, but you probably only have one or two more days to do it.  If you're still interested, I suggest you submit the nomination now. --[[User:Skotywa|SkotyWA]]<sup>''[[User_talk:Skotywa|T]]''</sup><sub style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">''[[Special:Contributions/Skotywa|C]]''</sub> 16:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

14353 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-22 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.308771480E09 +++$+++ Ed, [[Brazilian battleship Riachuelo (1883)]] and [[Brazilian battleship Aquidab\xe3]] are regarded as late ironclad ships or as pre-dreadnoughts? -- +++$+++ Ed, [[Brazilian battleship Riachuelo (1883)]] and [[Brazilian battleship Aquidabã]] are regarded as late ironclad ships or as pre-dreadnoughts? --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 12:38, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
14354 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14353 +++$+++ 14353 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.308816660E09 +++$+++ I notived that most Japanese warships of the late 19th Century were acquired in foreign shipyards. When Japan began building its own ships? -- +++$+++ :I notived that most Japanese warships of the late 19th Century were acquired in foreign shipyards. When Japan began building its own ships? --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 01:11, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

14355 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14355 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-24 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.308947760E09 +++$+++ I like to make a few remarks about Teresa Cristina's article, if you don't mind. You're losing your time with the farce back there. That's one pointless discussion, since the final result has been decided regardless of any discussion. Having said that, now I'd like to tell you that it makes no sense to add \"Theresa Christina\" as an alternative spelling. That was never under discussion. This \"Theresa Christina\" as an alternative spelling that you find there is nothing more than simply her name as it was written in the 19th century and as how many historians call her. Now, what was really the problem in the article? I just wanted to add a translation (or even a possible translation) to her name from Portuguese to English. That's all. Pedro II means \"Peter II\" in English. Afonso means \"Alphonse\". Maria means \"Mary\". Etc, etc, etc... The names \"Theresa Christina\" and \"Therese Christine\" are just anglicized forms of her name. Please, do not confuse this English name Theresa Christina with the \"Theresa Christina\" (yes, it's the same spelling) used in several sources that it's as how her name was written in 19th century Portuguese. Why I wanted to add \"Theresa Christina\" (as I also added \"Peter II\" to [[Pedro II of Brazil]])? Just so that Brazilian royals' articles could have the same standard as other articles such as [[Franz Joseph I of Austria]] and [[Ludwig III of Bavaria]]. Both have their names are in their native languages (German), but an anglicized form can be seen in parantheses at the beginning of the lead (\"Francis Joseph I\" and \"Louis III\"), as in any other article about a royal in Wikipedia. That's all I wanted to do with articles about Brazilian royals, that is, to follow the same standard. Please tell me if I'm not being able to be clear enough, because unfortunately, this is the feeling I have. -- +++$+++ I like to make a few remarks about Teresa Cristina's article, if you don't mind. You're losing your time with the farce back there. That's one pointless discussion, since the final result has been decided regardless of any discussion. Having said that, now I'd like to tell you that it makes no sense to add "Theresa Christina" as an alternative spelling. That was never under discussion. This "Theresa Christina" as an alternative spelling that you find there is nothing more than simply her name as it was written in the 19th century and as how many historians call her. Now, what was really the problem in the article? I just wanted to add a translation (or even a possible translation) to her name from Portuguese to English. That's all. Pedro II means "Peter II" in English. Afonso means "Alphonse". Maria means "Mary". Etc, etc, etc... The names "Theresa Christina" and "Therese Christine" are just anglicized forms of her name. Please, do not confuse this English name Theresa Christina with the "Theresa Christina" (yes, it's the same spelling) used in several sources that it's as how her name was written in 19th century Portuguese. Why I wanted to add "Theresa Christina" (as I also added "Peter II" to [[Pedro II of Brazil]])? Just so that Brazilian royals' articles could have the same standard as other articles such as [[Franz Joseph I of Austria]] and [[Ludwig III of Bavaria]]. Both have their names are in their native languages (German), but an anglicized form can be seen in parantheses at the beginning of the lead ("Francis Joseph I" and "Louis III"), as in any other article about a royal in Wikipedia. That's all I wanted to do with articles about Brazilian royals, that is, to follow the same standard. Please tell me if I'm not being able to be clear enough, because unfortunately, this is the feeling I have. --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 13:36, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14356 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14355 +++$+++ 14355 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.308996360E09 +++$+++ Well, it is an alternate spelling that readers will find in sources... I'm not confusing the two, it's simply a matter of practicality. On the matter of an English translation, could \"Theresa Christine\" function as the English translation instead? So the lead could be \"''[[Don (honorific)|Dona]]''<sup>[A]<\/sup> '''Teresa Cristina''' (''Portuguese, English:'' Theresa Christine)<sup>[B]<\/sup>\" or just \"''English:''\"? The [B] would explain the differences in Portuguese orthography, similar to [[Minas Geraes-class battleship]]. Maybe? (trying to find a compromise here that will be acceptable to both of you so you and Kiernan can go your separate ways!)  +++$+++ :Well, it is an alternate spelling that readers will find in sources... I'm not confusing the two, it's simply a matter of practicality. On the matter of an English translation, could "Theresa Christine" function as the English translation instead? So the lead could be "''[[Don (honorific)|Dona]]''<sup>[A]</sup> '''Teresa Cristina''' (''Portuguese, English:'' Theresa Christine)<sup>[B]</sup>" or just "''English:''"? The [B] would explain the differences in Portuguese orthography, similar to [[Minas Geraes-class battleship]]. Maybe? (trying to find a compromise here that will be acceptable to both of you so you and Kiernan can go your separate ways!) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 03:06, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14357 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14355 +++$+++ 14356 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.309044420E09 +++$+++ This reminds me of the [[Judgment of Solomon]]. You can't simply cut the baby in two pieces to please both parties. What if there were 3,4 or 5 editors with different views? So far no one has answered me why Teresa Cristina's article is the only in Wikipedia where the subject's name is not allowed to have its name translated to English. Nonetheless, this is something that you should not worry about it. You have more to do and I'll open a RFC to deal with it later. However, I'd like to thank you for having tried (and I know you did your best) to at least resolve the problem. You're a good person and I admire that. -- +++$+++ ::This reminds me of the [[Judgment of Solomon]]. You can't simply cut the baby in two pieces to please both parties. What if there were 3,4 or 5 editors with different views? So far no one has answered me why Teresa Cristina's article is the only in Wikipedia where the subject's name is not allowed to have its name translated to English. Nonetheless, this is something that you should not worry about it. You have more to do and I'll open a RFC to deal with it later. However, I'd like to thank you for having tried (and I know you did your best) to at least resolve the problem. You're a good person and I admire that. --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 16:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14358 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14355 +++$+++ 14355 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.309200660E09 +++$+++ Am I really speaking Greek there? I must improve my English at all costs... I want to add an Anglicized form of her name regardless of the fact that is or not a single book which does. They keep checking the Google books but that's not the point. In fact, nowdays when some dispute must be resolved in Wikipedia, all user rely on \"Google books hits\". Makes no sense, but that's how it is. What I do want is to keep the articles about Brazilian royals in the same standard as all other articles about royals. Be sincere, is it so hard to understand? If yes, could you exlain me the correct way to say it in English? -- +++$+++ :Am I really speaking Greek there? I must improve my English at all costs... I want to add an Anglicized form of her name regardless of the fact that is or not a single book which does. They keep checking the Google books but that's not the point. In fact, nowdays when some dispute must be resolved in Wikipedia, all user rely on "Google books hits". Makes no sense, but that's how it is. What I do want is to keep the articles about Brazilian royals in the same standard as all other articles about royals. Be sincere, is it so hard to understand? If yes, could you exlain me the correct way to say it in English? --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 11:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
14359 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14355 +++$+++ 14358 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.309280520E09 +++$+++ I think their argument is that you'd be able to find a translated name for the other royals in sources, but the same doesn't apply to Teresa Cristina. The problem is that if no sources use the alternate name you desire, their argument is the only one that holds water based on WP's policies (WP:V trumps naming guidelines). :\/ FWIW, I think they have a point with \"Therese Christine\" &ndash; Therese isn't a very common name in English and looks more like a French translation. \"Theresa Christina\" is both an alternate name (old Portuguese) and an English translation, and I hope we can find a good\/better way to include it. I think a lot of the problem here is that other royals have clearly-established translations (Pedro -> Peter, for instance) whereas Teresa is used in English and has no real translation except to alternative forms of the word.  +++$+++ ::I think their argument is that you'd be able to find a translated name for the other royals in sources, but the same doesn't apply to Teresa Cristina. The problem is that if no sources use the alternate name you desire, their argument is the only one that holds water based on WP's policies (WP:V trumps naming guidelines). :/ FWIW, I think they have a point with "Therese Christine" &ndash; Therese isn't a very common name in English and looks more like a French translation. "Theresa Christina" is both an alternate name (old Portuguese) and an English translation, and I hope we can find a good/better way to include it. I think a lot of the problem here is that other royals have clearly-established translations (Pedro -> Peter, for instance) whereas Teresa is used in English and has no real translation except to alternative forms of the word. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 10:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

538645 +++$+++  +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-12 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.273714680E09 +++$+++ Could you please reconsider [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/1991 College Baseball All-America Team\/archive1]] and offer further guidance.  Please <nowiki>strike<\/nowiki> where appropriate.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ Could you please reconsider [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/1991 College Baseball All-America Team/archive1]] and offer further guidance.  Please <nowiki>strike</nowiki> where appropriate.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 18:38, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
538646 +++$+++  +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538645 +++$+++ 538645 +++$+++ 2010-05-13 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.273795020E09 +++$+++ What are your current thoughts?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ :What are your current thoughts?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 16:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
538647 +++$+++  +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538645 +++$+++ 538646 +++$+++ 2010-05-14 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.273876200E09 +++$+++ Don't forget about this one.  I need some feedback on if this is the right direction to go.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ ::Don't forget about this one.  I need some feedback on if this is the right direction to go.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 15:30, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
538648 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538645 +++$+++ 538647 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.274334300E09 +++$+++ Hi Nmajdan, can you revisit this FLC when you get the chance?  +++$+++ :::Hi Nmajdan, can you revisit this FLC when you get the chance? [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 22:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
538649 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538645 +++$+++ 538647 +++$+++ 2010-05-21 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.274425200E09 +++$+++ And [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/Atlantic Coast Conference Men's Basketball Coach of the Year\/archive1]] as well. Thanks,  +++$+++ :::And [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Atlantic Coast Conference Men's Basketball Coach of the Year/archive1]] as well. Thanks, [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 00:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

276503 +++$+++ 293.xx.xxx.xx +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-28 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.243568520E09 +++$+++ Please note that I have posted an alert to [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts]] to attempt to resolve the issue of your abusive language in an attempt to settle the content dispute. -- +++$+++ Please note that I have posted an alert to [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts]] to attempt to resolve the issue of your abusive language in an attempt to settle the content dispute. --[[User:293.xx.xxx.xx|293.xx.xxx.xx]] ([[User talk:293.xx.xxx.xx|talk]]) 20:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
276504 +++$+++ SheffieldSteel +++$+++ Warren +++$+++ 276503 +++$+++ 276503 +++$+++ 2009-05-28 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.243570140E09 +++$+++ Warren, please avoid making personal comments about other editors, their motivations, tactics, shortcomings etc etc. [[WP:No personal attacks|Comment on content, not the contributor]]. You are likely to be much more successful and productive if you do, particularly when involved in a content dispute.  Thank you.  <font color=\"006622\"> +++$+++ :Warren, please avoid making personal comments about other editors, their motivations, tactics, shortcomings etc etc. [[WP:No personal attacks|Comment on content, not the contributor]]. You are likely to be much more successful and productive if you do, particularly when involved in a content dispute.  Thank you.  <font color="006622">[[User:SheffieldSteel|S<small>HEFFIELD</small>S<small>TEEL</small>]]</font><sup><small><b>[[User_talk:SheffieldSteel|TALK]]</b></small></sup> 21:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

14361 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-23 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.308864300E09 +++$+++ Treating this situation in the way that it was is entirely routine and normal. A person engaging in edit warring while knowingly breaching policy will get blocked. That anybody involved in this is somehow responsible for his departure is improper. It was his choice to depart Wikipedia over something he knew well was improper on his part. I don't want to lose him from this project. He's done a lot of good work. But, if he feels it necessary to leave because he got upset over his willful ignorance and willingness to edit war, then so be it. I thank him for his contributions, and wish him well in future endeavors. -- +++$+++ Treating this situation in the way that it was is entirely routine and normal. A person engaging in edit warring while knowingly breaching policy will get blocked. That anybody involved in this is somehow responsible for his departure is improper. It was his choice to depart Wikipedia over something he knew well was improper on his part. I don't want to lose him from this project. He's done a lot of good work. But, if he feels it necessary to leave because he got upset over his willful ignorance and willingness to edit war, then so be it. I thank him for his contributions, and wish him well in future endeavors. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 14:25, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
14362 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14361 +++$+++ 14361 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.308885300E09 +++$+++ You're very wrong, and I'm appalled that this experience is considered \"routine and normal.\" Slapping a template on Dapi's page that calls him a new user (which, by the way, he didn't even realize was a template), and then to reply with 'it's a template, GOFIXIT' is impersonal, cold, and doesn't address the root of the issue. It was clear that Dapi did not understand why the image was being removed, and while Beetstra did make an attempt at a personal comment, Dapi reverted one minute after that (did he not view the image beforehand?). Without waiting any longer, Beetstra blocked. In short: an overly harsh and stringent enforcing of the rules drove a valuable editor off the project. Please, examine your methods and NFUR interactions before this happens again.  +++$+++ :You're very wrong, and I'm appalled that this experience is considered "routine and normal." Slapping a template on Dapi's page that calls him a new user (which, by the way, he didn't even realize was a template), and then to reply with 'it's a template, GOFIXIT' is impersonal, cold, and doesn't address the root of the issue. It was clear that Dapi did not understand why the image was being removed, and while Beetstra did make an attempt at a personal comment, Dapi reverted one minute after that (did he not view the image beforehand?). Without waiting any longer, Beetstra blocked. In short: an overly harsh and stringent enforcing of the rules drove a valuable editor off the project. Please, examine your methods and NFUR interactions before this happens again. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 20:15, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
14363 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14361 +++$+++ 14362 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.308893760E09 +++$+++ I fully expect that editors who edit war in ignorance of [[WP:NFCC]] policy when directly told multiple times will find themselves blocked. In fact, I will ask for such people to be blocked. If you feel this is improper behavior, and remain appalled, then I recommend bringing it to the attention of [[WP:AN\/I]]. I'm surprised that an administrator would find it acceptable that an experienced editor, who knows full well the edit warring policy, and should be permitted to continue with his edit war in violation of multiple policies. -- +++$+++ :*I fully expect that editors who edit war in ignorance of [[WP:NFCC]] policy when directly told multiple times will find themselves blocked. In fact, I will ask for such people to be blocked. If you feel this is improper behavior, and remain appalled, then I recommend bringing it to the attention of [[WP:AN/I]]. I'm surprised that an administrator would find it acceptable that an experienced editor, who knows full well the edit warring policy, and should be permitted to continue with his edit war in violation of multiple policies. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 22:36, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

538650 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-21 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.274438220E09 +++$+++ I'm out of town on business so I won't be able to devote enough time until Monday. I will post my followup's early next week.\xbb +++$+++ I'm out of town on business so I won't be able to devote enough time until Monday. I will post my followup's early next week.»[[User:Nmajdan|<font style="font:bold 11px monospace;">NMajdan</font>]]·[[User talk:Nmajdan|<font style="font:9px sans-serif; color:#000;">talk</font>]] 03:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
538651 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538650 +++$+++ 538650 +++$+++ 2010-05-21 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.274470620E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for the reply.  +++$+++ :OK, thanks for the reply. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 12:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
538652 +++$+++  +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538650 +++$+++ 538651 +++$+++ 2010-05-28 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.275086640E09 +++$+++ It is getting close to decision time on [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/1991 College Baseball All-America Team\/archive1\u200e]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ ::It is getting close to decision time on [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/1991 College Baseball All-America Team/archive1‎]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 15:44, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

276507 +++$+++ Deb +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-11-21 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.101068160E09 +++$+++ That's a very interesting point about sweepstakes, though I don't think your logic is irrefutable (one could argue that the winner sweeps the \"entire stake\" or \"everybody's stake\").  Haven't tracked down a definitive answer yet, but please let me know if you do.  +++$+++ That's a very interesting point about sweepstakes, though I don't think your logic is irrefutable (one could argue that the winner sweeps the "entire stake" or "everybody's stake").  Haven't tracked down a definitive answer yet, but please let me know if you do. [[User:Deb|Deb]] 12:16, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
276508 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276507 +++$+++ 276507 +++$+++ 2004-11-21 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.101098820E09 +++$+++ True, without a citation search (and I don't have OED access now) we can't be certain, but clearly the plural form is used like a mass noun, and you can speak both of \"the sweepstakes\" or \"a sweepstakes\" and \"all sweepstakes\" without using the truncated form, and phrases like \"sweepstakes betting\" that are certainly closer to the origin than mail-order contests strongly suggest how it was used. -- +++$+++ * True, without a citation search (and I don't have OED access now) we can't be certain, but clearly the plural form is used like a mass noun, and you can speak both of "the sweepstakes" or "a sweepstakes" and "all sweepstakes" without using the truncated form, and phrases like "sweepstakes betting" that are certainly closer to the origin than mail-order contests strongly suggest how it was used. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] 20:47, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

14364 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-23 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.308894540E09 +++$+++ Re: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADapi89&action=historysubmit&diff=435860477&oldid=435839006 this comment]. To expand, if Dapi wants to leave the project over something as minor as this altercation, that's his business. I don't feel any culpability in this, nor should {{BCD}} or Beetstra. If someone self immolates themselves because you brought them up short on a blatant violation of our policies, that doesn't mean we should change our policies or refuse to tell people they're in violation and when they continue to violate it block them. There's a reason we have the block button. There's a reason we have the {{tl|unblock}} template too. He could very easily have made such a request acknowledging he was edit warring, assuring he would not do it again and would honor NFCC policy, and it would have been reviewed and most likely he would have been unblocked within a few hours if not minutes. I'm not terribly concerned that he's decided to get even angrier over this and decided to leave. If someone is that easy to agitate over something so blatant, ...well, such actions speak for themselves. -- +++$+++ Re: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADapi89&action=historysubmit&diff=435860477&oldid=435839006 this comment]. To expand, if Dapi wants to leave the project over something as minor as this altercation, that's his business. I don't feel any culpability in this, nor should {{BCD}} or Beetstra. If someone self immolates themselves because you brought them up short on a blatant violation of our policies, that doesn't mean we should change our policies or refuse to tell people they're in violation and when they continue to violate it block them. There's a reason we have the block button. There's a reason we have the {{tl|unblock}} template too. He could very easily have made such a request acknowledging he was edit warring, assuring he would not do it again and would honor NFCC policy, and it would have been reviewed and most likely he would have been unblocked within a few hours if not minutes. I'm not terribly concerned that he's decided to get even angrier over this and decided to leave. If someone is that easy to agitate over something so blatant, ...well, such actions speak for themselves. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 22:49, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
14365 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14364 +++$+++ 14364 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.308907020E09 +++$+++ There's a reason we have a protect button too. I don't think Dappi understood the point you were all getting at, and even if he did after Beetstra's message, he was blocked so quickly that he never was given a chance to understand. Perhaps educating these editors in the ways of NFCC (as I can tell you that many don't know much if anything about it) rather than dropping heavy-handed templates and blocks on them would result in less work for you guys down the road? Serious thoughts here, no sarcasm. I'm not going to ANI with this because I believe all of you were acting in good faith &ndash; I'd just like you to see the other side of the fence too. Also, FWIW, given some of the topics Dapi wrote on, I'm pretty sure he's weathered worse. I don't know why this pushed him over the edge, but it did.  +++$+++ :There's a reason we have a protect button too. I don't think Dappi understood the point you were all getting at, and even if he did after Beetstra's message, he was blocked so quickly that he never was given a chance to understand. Perhaps educating these editors in the ways of NFCC (as I can tell you that many don't know much if anything about it) rather than dropping heavy-handed templates and blocks on them would result in less work for you guys down the road? Serious thoughts here, no sarcasm. I'm not going to ANI with this because I believe all of you were acting in good faith &ndash; I'd just like you to see the other side of the fence too. Also, FWIW, given some of the topics Dapi wrote on, I'm pretty sure he's weathered worse. I don't know why this pushed him over the edge, but it did. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 02:17, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14366 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14364 +++$+++ 14365 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.308945060E09 +++$+++ Hold up nothing. He was edit warring, and he knew it. Never given a chance to understand? He never gave ''himself'' a chance to understand. He just continued edit warring. -- +++$+++ :*Hold up nothing. He was edit warring, and he knew it. Never given a chance to understand? He never gave ''himself'' a chance to understand. He just continued edit warring. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 12:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14367 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14364 +++$+++ 14366 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.308995820E09 +++$+++ He reverted three times before being given an adequate explanation for the image's removal &ndash; he was just following [[WP:BRD]]. Obviously that shouldn't apply in this situation, but how was he to know? He probably thought {{BCD}} was the one edit-warring! (hence my comment above about educating editors about NFCC... completely separate from our disagreement here, I really hope you take that idea on, because that can only lead to an easier time for all NFCC patrollers!) I firmly believe that the image could have been quickly removed after a short discussion that resulted in no blocks or hard feelings, and I would have supported a block in this instance if he had ignored a 'real' message given to him before we reached the edit warring stage.  +++$+++ ::*He reverted three times before being given an adequate explanation for the image's removal &ndash; he was just following [[WP:BRD]]. Obviously that shouldn't apply in this situation, but how was he to know? He probably thought {{BCD}} was the one edit-warring! (hence my comment above about educating editors about NFCC... completely separate from our disagreement here, I really hope you take that idea on, because that can only lead to an easier time for all NFCC patrollers!) I firmly believe that the image could have been quickly removed after a short discussion that resulted in no blocks or hard feelings, and I would have supported a block in this instance if he had ignored a 'real' message given to him before we reached the edit warring stage. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 02:57, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

538653 +++$+++ Jrcla2 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-26 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.274922000E09 +++$+++ A little while back you left comments on [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/Atlantic Coast Conference Men's Basketball Coach of the Year\/archive1]]. We've revised your concerns and I was wondering if you could re-examine the article and either raise more concerns or give it your stamp of approval for FL status. Thanks.  +++$+++ A little while back you left comments on [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Atlantic Coast Conference Men's Basketball Coach of the Year/archive1]]. We've revised your concerns and I was wondering if you could re-examine the article and either raise more concerns or give it your stamp of approval for FL status. Thanks. [[User:Jrcla2|Jrcla2]] ([[User talk:Jrcla2|talk]]) 18:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
538654 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Nmajdan +++$+++ 538653 +++$+++ 538653 +++$+++ 2010-06-01 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.275385320E09 +++$+++ Hi Nmajdan, can you revisit this FLC when you get the chance (I know you must be busy)? Thanks,  +++$+++ :Hi Nmajdan, can you revisit this FLC when you get the chance (I know you must be busy)? Thanks, [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 02:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

14368 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-24 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.308966840E09 +++$+++ Would it be ok to leave what is already there in [[Military history of the Russian Empire]] intact, and refer to third and fourth sources for the remainder of the article? Looking back over what I've read so far, mostly it is the details that are different. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"#333\"> +++$+++ Would it be ok to leave what is already there in [[Military history of the Russian Empire]] intact, and refer to third and fourth sources for the remainder of the article? Looking back over what I've read so far, mostly it is the details that are different. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#444">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 18:54, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14369 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14368 +++$+++ 14368 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.308995460E09 +++$+++ I'd add as many cites as you can from as many varied works as possible to prove that you've done an adequate amount of research for such a large-scale article, but that's just me. :-)  +++$+++ :I'd add as many cites as you can from as many varied works as possible to prove that you've done an adequate amount of research for such a large-scale article, but that's just me. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 02:51, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14370 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14368 +++$+++ 14369 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.309087800E09 +++$+++ I now have a [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=fMgFAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA307&dq=munnich&hl=en&ei=ItoETtncCZCd0gGnh_z4BA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=munnich&f=false third reference], but I can't really add anything else of the half-books from Google Books. Might be able to go library browsing, but I don't know about that. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"#333\"> +++$+++ ::I now have a [http://books.google.com/books?id=fMgFAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA307&dq=munnich&hl=en&ei=ItoETtncCZCd0gGnh_z4BA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=munnich&f=false third reference], but I can't really add anything else of the half-books from Google Books. Might be able to go library browsing, but I don't know about that. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#444">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 04:30, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
14371 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14368 +++$+++ 14370 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.309099380E09 +++$+++ Yeah, when I'm not at college, my local library is mostly useless: [[Iron River, Michigan|it's too small.]] Having said that, I'd recommend looking into your state's inter-library loan system. You can normally acquire any book from any library in the state, so you way be able to get a really good reference (for a month-ish, at least!)  +++$+++ :::Yeah, when I'm not at college, my local library is mostly useless: [[Iron River, Michigan|it's too small.]] Having said that, I'd recommend looking into your state's inter-library loan system. You can normally acquire any book from any library in the state, so you way be able to get a really good reference (for a month-ish, at least!) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 07:43, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
14372 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14368 +++$+++ 14368 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309168440E09 +++$+++ Found my card. How long do these transfers take? I'm leaving for vacation in 7 days. :\/ Anyway, I've requested [http:\/\/catalog.brooklynpubliclibrary.org\/search~S63?\/c947+D\/c947+d\/-3,-1,,E\/browse this bunch]. Should be enough, I think. I'll take a break and edit some other things on the interm. Thanks for the help! <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"#333\"> +++$+++ :Found my card. How long do these transfers take? I'm leaving for vacation in 7 days. :/ Anyway, I've requested [http://catalog.brooklynpubliclibrary.org/search~S63?/c947+D/c947+d/-3,-1,,E/browse this bunch]. Should be enough, I think. I'll take a break and edit some other things on the interm. Thanks for the help! <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#444">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 02:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
14373 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14368 +++$+++ 14372 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.309170120E09 +++$+++ Inter-library loan can be amazing. It certainly allowed me to write a college paper on the [[Marian reforms]]! Depends on the mail system. I've found that some libraries get them in the mail on the next business day, while some others take a little bit of time. Good luck!  +++$+++ ::Inter-library loan can be amazing. It certainly allowed me to write a college paper on the [[Marian reforms]]! Depends on the mail system. I've found that some libraries get them in the mail on the next business day, while some others take a little bit of time. Good luck! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 03:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

276513 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276513 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ ..hey, your actually on my watchlist, although I never use that feature other than as a sort of vote for insightful posters. How many MeFi'ers are there on WP? It would not be too difficult to set up a group, if nothing else to list other members for some unknown future collaborations or announcements. (User:Stbalbach) 07:23, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC) +++$+++ ..hey, your actually on my watchlist, although I never use that feature other than as a sort of vote for insightful posters. How many MeFi'ers are there on WP? It would not be too difficult to set up a group, if nothing else to list other members for some unknown future collaborations or announcements. (User:Stbalbach) 07:23, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
276514 +++$+++ Céçaquiéça +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276513 +++$+++ 276513 +++$+++ 2005-01-05 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.104942600E09 +++$+++ I'm a too cheap for membership lurker and MoFite  +++$+++ * I'm a too cheap for membership lurker and MoFite [[User:Céçaquiéça|Céçaquiéça]] 08:30, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

264539 +++$+++ 86.173.139.210 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264539 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-26 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.230351300E09 +++$+++ I think that says it all really [[Special:Contributions\/86.173.139.210|86.173.139.210]] ( +++$+++ I think that says it all really [[Special:Contributions/86.173.139.210|86.173.139.210]] ([[User talk:86.173.139.210|talk]]) 20:15, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
264540 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264539 +++$+++ 264539 +++$+++ 2008-12-26 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.230351600E09 +++$+++ Articulate as usual.  +++$+++ :Articulate as usual. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:20, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

14375 +++$+++ PMG +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.309272360E09 +++$+++ Can you do that? My english is not so good when I am trying to write, so I don`t want make articles with errors.  +++$+++ Can you do that? My english is not so good when I am trying to write, so I don`t want make articles with errors. [[User:PMG|PMG]] ([[User talk:PMG|talk]]) 07:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
14376 +++$+++ PMG +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14375 +++$+++ 14375 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.309274040E09 +++$+++ Also [[RV Thomas G. Thompson]] and [[USNS Thomas G. Thompson]] are the same.  +++$+++ :Also [[RV Thomas G. Thompson]] and [[USNS Thomas G. Thompson]] are the same. [[User:PMG|PMG]] ([[User talk:PMG|talk]]) 08:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
14377 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14375 +++$+++ 14376 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 10:03:00 +++$+++ 1.309280580E09 +++$+++ Wait, so you want to move the disambiguation pages? I.e. [[Belet]] to [[USS Belet]]? I don't think that will work because \"Belet\" etc. don't just apply to ships...  +++$+++ ::Wait, so you want to move the disambiguation pages? I.e. [[Belet]] to [[USS Belet]]? I don't think that will work because "Belet" etc. don't just apply to ships... [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 10:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

276521 +++$+++ Freestylefrappe +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-05-01 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.114988400E09 +++$+++ There is a consensus between Pharos, Aris Katsaris and myself to get rid of the \"possible historical predeccesors\" section because it is unrelated and has no connection to the main topic. See the \"Back to the Real World\" section on the talk page. Would you be against this?  +++$+++ There is a consensus between Pharos, Aris Katsaris and myself to get rid of the "possible historical predeccesors" section because it is unrelated and has no connection to the main topic. See the "Back to the Real World" section on the talk page. Would you be against this? [[User:Freestylefrappe|freestylefrappe]] 16:00, May 1, 2005 (UTC)
276522 +++$+++ Freestylefrappe +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276521 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-05-01 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.115002080E09 +++$+++ I got your message, it might be a good idea to start by simply pasting in the section i removed. If you want to keep the section though, I think the three of us would be fine as long as some sort of connection is established. The way it was, people were just lumping any revolution that took place in the last thirty years. Thanks for being gracious and avoiding an edit war.  +++$+++ :: I got your message, it might be a good idea to start by simply pasting in the section i removed. If you want to keep the section though, I think the three of us would be fine as long as some sort of connection is established. The way it was, people were just lumping any revolution that took place in the last thirty years. Thanks for being gracious and avoiding an edit war. [[User:Freestylefrappe|freestylefrappe]] 19:48, May 1, 2005 (UTC)

14378 +++$+++ PMG +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.309283940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:PMG|PMG]] ([[User talk:PMG|talk]]) 10:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
14379 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14378 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.309363800E09 +++$+++ Oh, I see. I don't think so &ndash; it's done that way to provide consistency, so all of the US Navy articles have the symbol at the end.  +++$+++ :::Oh, I see. I don't think so &ndash; it's done that way to provide consistency, so all of the US Navy articles have the symbol at the end. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 09:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
14380 +++$+++ PMG +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14378 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.309818960E09 +++$+++ Why not? On en.wiki there is more than 1500 articles like this, and only this what I put here are made by diffrent rule. For me its strange.   +++$+++ ::::Why not? On en.wiki there is more than 1500 articles like this, and only this what I put here are made by diffrent rule. For me its strange.  [[User:PMG|PMG]] ([[User talk:PMG|talk]]) 15:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

177159 +++$+++ JeremyA +++$+++ Lost on belmont +++$+++ 177159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-09 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.307674020E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm thinking that the old Oakton station and the new Oakton-Skokie station are not really the same thing and so would be better split into two articles. What do you think? \u2014 +++$+++ Hi, I'm thinking that the old Oakton station and the new Oakton-Skokie station are not really the same thing and so would be better split into two articles. What do you think? —[[User:JeremyA|Jeremy]] <small>([[User talk:JeremyA|talk]])</small> 19:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
177160 +++$+++ Lost on belmont +++$+++ Lost on belmont +++$+++ 177159 +++$+++ 177159 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.308020520E09 +++$+++ Thanks, for asking though!  +++$+++ :Thanks, for asking though! [[User:Lost on belmont|Lost on Belmont]] ([[User talk:Lost on belmont#top|talk]]) 20:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
177161 +++$+++ JeremyA +++$+++ Lost on belmont +++$+++ 177159 +++$+++ 177160 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.308028500E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. Not sure I agree, but it's a minor point.\u2014 +++$+++ ::Fair enough. Not sure I agree, but it's a minor point.—[[User:JeremyA|Jeremy]] <small>([[User talk:JeremyA|talk]])</small> 22:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

276524 +++$+++ Rmrfstar +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276524 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-13 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.118726940E09 +++$+++ Hey, I'd just like to tell you I've noticed all of the work you've done on [[Ladder theory]], and I really appreciate it... keep up the great work! --  +++$+++ Hey, I'd just like to tell you I've noticed all of the work you've done on [[Ladder theory]], and I really appreciate it... keep up the great work! -- [[User:Rmrfstar|Rmrfstar]] 22:29, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
276525 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276524 +++$+++ 276524 +++$+++ 2005-06-14 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.118750700E09 +++$+++ Your kudos is greatly appreciated. I see a bad article like that, and nothing's gonna stop me from wading in and improving the heck out of it! Feel free to help, of course. -- +++$+++ : Your kudos is greatly appreciated. I see a bad article like that, and nothing's gonna stop me from wading in and improving the heck out of it! Feel free to help, of course. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 05:05, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
276526 +++$+++ Rmrfstar +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276524 +++$+++ 276525 +++$+++ 2005-06-14 10:17:00 +++$+++ 1.118769420E09 +++$+++ I'm in the middle of finals at school, so I haven't a whole lot of free time. As soon as they're over though, you can plan on it. --  +++$+++ ::I'm in the middle of finals at school, so I haven't a whole lot of free time. As soon as they're over though, you can plan on it. -- [[User:Rmrfstar|Rmrfstar]] 10:17, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

14381 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-29 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.309357440E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid lightsteelblue;\" | For your outstanding work on on [[Minas Geraes-class battleship]], [[Brazilian battleship S\xe3o Paulo]] and [[South American dreadnought race]], all of which were promoted to A-class between January and June 2011. On behalf of the coordinators,  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid lightsteelblue;" | For your outstanding work on on [[Minas Geraes-class battleship]], [[Brazilian battleship São Paulo]] and [[South American dreadnought race]], all of which were promoted to A-class between January and June 2011. On behalf of the coordinators, [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 07:24, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
14382 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14381 +++$+++ 14381 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.309363800E09 +++$+++ Thanks ES! It's great to see you back again.  +++$+++ :Thanks ES! It's great to see you back again. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 09:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
14383 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14381 +++$+++ 14382 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.309384140E09 +++$+++ Cheers Ed, it's good to be back. I'm still going to be on and off for a while, but should be gradually spinning back up to speed :)  +++$+++ ::Cheers Ed, it's good to be back. I'm still going to be on and off for a while, but should be gradually spinning back up to speed :) [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 14:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
14384 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14381 +++$+++ 14383 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309450680E09 +++$+++ Hey, any activity is good as far as I'm concerned. Also, this is a rather random thought, but you should try to make it across the pond for [[:meta:Wikimania 2012|Wikimania 2012]]. I know that Cam and I will be there, and I'm hoping that we can get a little gathering of Milhisters together for a drink and many good memories. :-)  +++$+++ :::Hey, any activity is good as far as I'm concerned. Also, this is a rather random thought, but you should try to make it across the pond for [[:meta:Wikimania 2012|Wikimania 2012]]. I know that Cam and I will be there, and I'm hoping that we can get a little gathering of Milhisters together for a drink and many good memories. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 09:18, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
14385 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14381 +++$+++ 14384 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.309474560E09 +++$+++ <s>I don't think the venue for 2012 is settled yet, is it?<\/s> ''[edit] I'm clearly still not up to speed!'' Actually I'm kind of waiting 'till it comes to London, though when that will be... :)  +++$+++ ::::<s>I don't think the venue for 2012 is settled yet, is it?</s> ''[edit] I'm clearly still not up to speed!'' Actually I'm kind of waiting 'till it comes to London, though when that will be... :) [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 15:56, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
14386 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14381 +++$+++ 14385 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.309492620E09 +++$+++ I think it was decided in April... nice one. :P I'm just ecstatic that I can actually attend... a college student's budget does not include flying to Israel etc.! Alright then, it was worth a shot. Maybe it'll be in London in a couple years and I'll have to money to attend. :-)  +++$+++ :::::I think it was decided in April... nice one. :P I'm just ecstatic that I can actually attend... a college student's budget does not include flying to Israel etc.! Alright then, it was worth a shot. Maybe it'll be in London in a couple years and I'll have to money to attend. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 20:57, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

538671 +++$+++ Romanm +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-19 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.119165480E09 +++$+++ I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Please [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Where to ask a question]], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{&#123;helpme}}<\/code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!&nbsp; -- +++$+++ I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Please [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Where to ask a question]], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{&#123;helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!&nbsp; --[[User:Romanm|romanm]] [[User talk:romanm|(talk)]] 00:18, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
538672 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538671 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-09-12 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.126582860E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0439! \u0414\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430 \u0441\u044a\u043c \u0437\u0430\u0435\u0442 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u044a\u043a \u0438 \u0435\u0434\u0432\u0430 \u043b\u0438 \u0449\u0435 \u043c\u0438 \u0441\u0435 \u043e\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0438 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u044f \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u044f \u0432 \u0431\u043b\u0438\u0437\u043a\u043e \u0431\u044a\u0434\u0435\u0449\u0435. \u0414\u043e\u0440\u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0438 \u0432 Wikipedia \u043d\u0435 \u043c\u0438 \u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435 :( \u041d\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u0435\u043c\u0430 \u0441\u0435\u0433\u0430, \u043d\u043e \u0449\u0435 \u0433\u043e \u0438\u043c\u0430\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0432\u0438\u0434 \u0437\u0430 \u0432 \u0431\u044a\u0434\u0435\u0449\u0435 (\u0437\u0430 \u0441\u044a\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0435\u0434\u0432\u0430 \u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0443\u043c \u043c\u0435\u0441\u0435\u0446) \u0438 \u0435\u0432\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u043d\u043e \u043f\u043e\u043e\u0441\u0432\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0434\u044f \u043b\u0438 \u0441\u0435 \u0441 \u0443\u0434\u043e\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0435 \u0431\u0438\u0445 \u044f \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b. \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u043e\u043d\u043a\u0440\u0435\u0442\u043d\u043e \u0437\u0430 \u0442\u0430\u0437\u0438 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f \u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0442\u043e \u0442\u0438 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0435 \u0432 \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0435\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0430 \u0431\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0442\u0435\u0437\u0438 \u043f\u043e \u0432\u0441\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0438 \u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u043d\u0438 \u0432\u044a\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0438, \u043c\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0443 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u043e\u0442\u043e! -- +++$+++ ::: Здравей! Доста съм зает напоследък и едва ли ще ми се отвори време да я направя в близко бъдеще. Дори за приноси в Wikipedia не ми остава време :( Не мога да се заема сега, но ще го имам предвид за в бъдеще (за съжаление едва след минимум месец) и евентуално поосвободя ли се с удоволствие бих я направил. Поздравления конкретно за тази статия и за активното ти участие в защитаването на българските тези по всички спорни въпроси, между другото! --[[User:TodorBozhinov|Martyr]] 20:41, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

276528 +++$+++ Barkeep49 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-17 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.119076680E09 +++$+++ I was just looking at what linked to the Highland Park, IL page and noticed that you had created a Ravinia Festival page as a user page and not a main page.  While trying to figure that out I saw that you also went to Beloit College.  Anyhow the main reason for my writing is to inquire if there was a reason for not making your Ravinia Festival page a normal entry.  +++$+++ I was just looking at what linked to the Highland Park, IL page and noticed that you had created a Ravinia Festival page as a user page and not a main page.  While trying to figure that out I saw that you also went to Beloit College.  Anyhow the main reason for my writing is to inquire if there was a reason for not making your Ravinia Festival page a normal entry. [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] 23:38, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
276529 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276528 +++$+++ 276528 +++$+++ 2005-06-17 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.119077700E09 +++$+++ Barkeep, not that coincidental -- lots of people from Chicagoland go to Beloit! Anyway, that was something I created in my User \"sandbox\" and promptly forgot about, so thanks for reminding me -- I have moved it to the normal location. -- +++$+++ :Barkeep, not that coincidental -- lots of people from Chicagoland go to Beloit! Anyway, that was something I created in my User "sandbox" and promptly forgot about, so thanks for reminding me -- I have moved it to the normal location. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 23:55, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

538673 +++$+++ REX +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-11 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.129078080E09 +++$+++ Todor, I am confused. What do you want on the [[Macedonian Slavs]] page? Your opinion really is important and I would like to hear it. Are you in favour of calling this ethnic group Macedonians or Macedonian Slavs? I can assure you that either way, no anti-Bulgarian, anti-Greek or even anti-Eskimo POV will be included. If the change ever takes place, it will be because the available NPOV evidence (ie other encyclopaedias) suggests it. Tell me, if [[Encyclopaedia Britannica]], the [[Hutchinson Encyclopedia]] etc (the whole list mentioned on [[Talk:Macedonian Slavs]]) call these people Macedonians, why is us using that name according to Wikipedia policy so POV?  +++$+++ Todor, I am confused. What do you want on the [[Macedonian Slavs]] page? Your opinion really is important and I would like to hear it. Are you in favour of calling this ethnic group Macedonians or Macedonian Slavs? I can assure you that either way, no anti-Bulgarian, anti-Greek or even anti-Eskimo POV will be included. If the change ever takes place, it will be because the available NPOV evidence (ie other encyclopaedias) suggests it. Tell me, if [[Encyclopaedia Britannica]], the [[Hutchinson Encyclopedia]] etc (the whole list mentioned on [[Talk:Macedonian Slavs]]) call these people Macedonians, why is us using that name according to Wikipedia policy so POV? [[User:REX|REX]] 17:48, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
538674 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538673 +++$+++ 538673 +++$+++ 2005-10-11 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.129082340E09 +++$+++ I probably hadn't expressed myself clear enough. I don't actually have an opinion on the topic, if Macedonians want to be called Macedonians, then let this be so. Just Bomac was denying the existence of other points of view (not mine) with this \"real name\". I mean, [[Dutch people|Dutch]] might call their land \"Nederland\", while we might prefer \"\u0425\u043e\u043b\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0438\u044f\" (Holandia, a version of Holland), and [[Czechs]] have lierally translated the former to \"Nizozemsko\". Nothing has a \"real name\", and [[Greeks]] might actually insist on \"[[Macedonian Slavs]]\". That's what I'm against and what I was targeting, accepting \"[[Macedonians]]\" as, like, the only possible \"real name\". ''\/ In short, let the article be called \"Macedonians\", all right, I'm cool with that. The reaction of Bomac was what upset me. Nothing else. \/'' [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]]  +++$+++ : I probably hadn't expressed myself clear enough. I don't actually have an opinion on the topic, if Macedonians want to be called Macedonians, then let this be so. Just Bomac was denying the existence of other points of view (not mine) with this "real name". I mean, [[Dutch people|Dutch]] might call their land "Nederland", while we might prefer "Холандия" (Holandia, a version of Holland), and [[Czechs]] have lierally translated the former to "Nizozemsko". Nothing has a "real name", and [[Greeks]] might actually insist on "[[Macedonian Slavs]]". That's what I'm against and what I was targeting, accepting "[[Macedonians]]" as, like, the only possible "real name". ''/ In short, let the article be called "Macedonians", all right, I'm cool with that. The reaction of Bomac was what upset me. Nothing else. /'' [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]] [[User:TodorBozhinov|→ Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov]] [[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|<sub>→ Talk</sub>]] 18:59, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

14387 +++$+++ Cunard +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-29 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.309364760E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, Ed, for closing [[Talk:September 11 attacks#Arthur Rubin reverts good faith edits]]. Would you edit your closure from \"Clear consensus for option one\" to \"Clear consensus for <nowiki>[[#Moving on to a general consensus|option one]]<\/nowiki>\"? Because the discussion is long, a link to the subsection where the proposal was made will make it easier to understand your closure when the page is archived. Also, would you quote option 1 in the close?<p>On an unrelated note, would you close any of the discussions at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Wikipedia talk:Notability (video games)#Proposal 2 and Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (icons)]]? Perhaps [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (video games)#Proposal 2]] and\/or [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Page mover]] if you don't want to do too much reading? If you don't have the time or inclination, then no worries. Thank you for your work.  +++$+++ Thank you very much, Ed, for closing [[Talk:September 11 attacks#Arthur Rubin reverts good faith edits]]. Would you edit your closure from "Clear consensus for option one" to "Clear consensus for <nowiki>[[#Moving on to a general consensus|option one]]</nowiki>"? Because the discussion is long, a link to the subsection where the proposal was made will make it easier to understand your closure when the page is archived. Also, would you quote option 1 in the close?<p>On an unrelated note, would you close any of the discussions at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Wikipedia talk:Notability (video games)#Proposal 2 and Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (icons)]]? Perhaps [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (video games)#Proposal 2]] and/or [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Page mover]] if you don't want to do too much reading? If you don't have the time or inclination, then no worries. Thank you for your work. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 09:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
14388 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14387 +++$+++ 14387 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.309365660E09 +++$+++ Done, thanks for the note. I'll try to take a look at the latter two after work, so roughly 20 hours (sleep+food+work) :-) I'm involved with the icon RfCs, given that I write ship articles that use them and I think I supported one or both. The NFCC RfC appears to have ended in May?  Regards, +++$+++ :Done, thanks for the note. I'll try to take a look at the latter two after work, so roughly 20 hours (sleep+food+work) :-) I'm involved with the icon RfCs, given that I write ship articles that use them and I think I supported one or both. The NFCC RfC appears to have ended in May?  Regards,[[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 09:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
14389 +++$+++ Cunard +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14387 +++$+++ 14388 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.309424400E09 +++$+++ Thank you for making my suggested changes!<p>The NFC debate was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content\/Archive_52&action=history recently archived] by {{user|ClueBot III}}, which [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&action=historysubmit&diff=436766496&oldid=436765131 modified] the AN link. Despite its being in the archives, it can still be closed. I would move it back to [[Wikipedia talk:Non-free content]] in wait for a proper closure, but Wikipedia talk:Non-free content is long enough as it is. I agree with your recusals from the [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (icons)]] RfCs since you have a strong opinion about those issues.<p>Thank you for pledging to look at the other two discussions later. :) Best,  +++$+++ ::Thank you for making my suggested changes!<p>The NFC debate was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content/Archive_52&action=history recently archived] by {{user|ClueBot III}}, which [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&action=historysubmit&diff=436766496&oldid=436765131 modified] the AN link. Despite its being in the archives, it can still be closed. I would move it back to [[Wikipedia talk:Non-free content]] in wait for a proper closure, but Wikipedia talk:Non-free content is long enough as it is. I agree with your recusals from the [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (icons)]] RfCs since you have a strong opinion about those issues.<p>Thank you for pledging to look at the other two discussions later. :) Best, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 02:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
14390 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14387 +++$+++ 14389 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.309447680E09 +++$+++ I closed both of them. I took a look at the NFCC one again, but I saw editors I recently got into a spat with at [[User talk:Dapi89]] and elsewhere, so I'd rather not close it. :-) At least 2\/5 are closed though! Regards,  +++$+++ :::I closed both of them. I took a look at the NFCC one again, but I saw editors I recently got into a spat with at [[User talk:Dapi89]] and elsewhere, so I'd rather not close it. :-) At least 2/5 are closed though! Regards, [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 08:28, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
14391 +++$+++ Cunard +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14387 +++$+++ 14390 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.309486980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for closing the discussions! A lot of progress has been made today with unclosed RfCs. I agree with your recusing from closing the NFCC one. This will avoid those editors' questioning your impartiality which could harm the validity of a close.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for closing the discussions! A lot of progress has been made today with unclosed RfCs. I agree with your recusing from closing the NFCC one. This will avoid those editors' questioning your impartiality which could harm the validity of a close. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 19:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
14392 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14387 +++$+++ 14391 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.309492620E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Let me know if there are others in the future and I'll try to close them. :-) Re NFCC, exactly, I don't want to go through the effort of closing it just to have it questioned by everyone!  +++$+++ :::::You're welcome. Let me know if there are others in the future and I'll try to close them. :-) Re NFCC, exactly, I don't want to go through the effort of closing it just to have it questioned by everyone! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 20:57, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
14393 +++$+++ Cunard +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14387 +++$+++ 14392 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309493880E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the offer to close discussions in the future. So that you don't get bogged down with requests and then get sick of seeing my signature :), I'll post RfCs at AN first, and if no admin responds for a while, I'll contact you. Best,  +++$+++ ::::::Thank you for the offer to close discussions in the future. So that you don't get bogged down with requests and then get sick of seeing my signature :), I'll post RfCs at AN first, and if no admin responds for a while, I'll contact you. Best, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 21:18, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

276534 +++$+++ Emerman +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-15 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.121411280E09 +++$+++ So anyway, what is the article mentioned at the top of this page that you created which made the Featured list? I would like to read it.  +++$+++ So anyway, what is the article mentioned at the top of this page that you created which made the Featured list? I would like to read it. [[User:Emerman|Emerman]] 00:08, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
276535 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276534 +++$+++ 276534 +++$+++ 2005-07-15 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.121417340E09 +++$+++ I ''have'' been thinking that I want to spend more time on that one in terms of notes or references due to the controversial nature. There's a lot more blank spots on Wikipedia regarding Al Qaeda and so forth than you'd think. -- +++$+++ :I ''have'' been thinking that I want to spend more time on that one in terms of notes or references due to the controversial nature. There's a lot more blank spots on Wikipedia regarding Al Qaeda and so forth than you'd think. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 01:49, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

276536 +++$+++ Emerman +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276536 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-15 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.121411700E09 +++$+++ P.S. I use the method you used of just dropping a URL in when I am on a Discussion page or pointing to my archive. I do not do that in our official articles because of what I had read in the past of our style guide style (unless it has recently changed). Look at the Kristin Hersh article as it is now and then at an earlier version I had done at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Kristin_Hersh&oldid=12142678] for an example of changes I made removing footnotes after reading a Wikipedia style guide discussion page on the preferences of those developing the Wikipedia citation style. The older version of the Hersh piece is the right way to do a Notes section, but those are found by some to be difficult to maintain, excessive and distracting. But let me know if you interpret the style guide differently and for some reason think it mandates we additionally put footnotes in the article when we already have References; if so I'll put in a Notes section for the items above the References section. I find it unnecessary. It is clear which articles are mentioned by simply looking for Boutin in the References and cleaner not to mix styles. I have been told before by admin that References were sufficient. We're just trying to document statements, not muddy up the page with footnotes.  +++$+++ P.S. I use the method you used of just dropping a URL in when I am on a Discussion page or pointing to my archive. I do not do that in our official articles because of what I had read in the past of our style guide style (unless it has recently changed). Look at the Kristin Hersh article as it is now and then at an earlier version I had done at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kristin_Hersh&oldid=12142678] for an example of changes I made removing footnotes after reading a Wikipedia style guide discussion page on the preferences of those developing the Wikipedia citation style. The older version of the Hersh piece is the right way to do a Notes section, but those are found by some to be difficult to maintain, excessive and distracting. But let me know if you interpret the style guide differently and for some reason think it mandates we additionally put footnotes in the article when we already have References; if so I'll put in a Notes section for the items above the References section. I find it unnecessary. It is clear which articles are mentioned by simply looking for Boutin in the References and cleaner not to mix styles. I have been told before by admin that References were sufficient. We're just trying to document statements, not muddy up the page with footnotes. [[User:Emerman|Emerman]] 00:15, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
276537 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276536 +++$+++ 276536 +++$+++ 2005-07-15 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.121417340E09 +++$+++ I don't see why proper references, and inline links where appropriate, can't co-exist. -- +++$+++ :I don't see why proper references, and inline links where appropriate, can't co-exist. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 01:49, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
276538 +++$+++ Emerman +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276536 +++$+++ 276537 +++$+++ 2005-07-16 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.121502300E09 +++$+++ I add more comments to this on my discussion page at \"Comment 2\" at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Emerman Emerman talk page] to avoid junking up your page with more rambling from me. Those comments will eventually be located in an archive #3 at my pages some day. Nice to chat with you. The main thing we both want is a nicely done article. Again, I think both of us can contribute plenty that complements one another. That's the bottom line. I do not mean to sound like I'm bickering. Sadly, I am just too wordy on talk pages.  +++$+++ ::I add more comments to this on my discussion page at "Comment 2" at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Emerman Emerman talk page] to avoid junking up your page with more rambling from me. Those comments will eventually be located in an archive #3 at my pages some day. Nice to chat with you. The main thing we both want is a nicely done article. Again, I think both of us can contribute plenty that complements one another. That's the bottom line. I do not mean to sound like I'm bickering. Sadly, I am just too wordy on talk pages. [[User:Emerman|Emerman]] 01:25, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

538681 +++$+++ VMORO +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-04 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.136399880E09 +++$+++ \u0422\u043e\u0434\u043e\u0440\u0435, \u043a\u044a\u043c \u0441\u0430\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0444\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f \u0441\u0435 \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0432\u0430\u0442 \u0438 \u041f\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0442 \u0438 \u0412\u0440\u0430\u043d\u044f \u0432 \u0434\u043d\u0435\u0448\u043d\u0430 \u0421\u044a\u0440\u0431\u0438\u044f. \u0410\u043a\u043e \u0438\u043c\u0430\u0448 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435 \u0438 \u0436\u0435\u043b\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043d\u044f\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0434\u0435\u043d, \u044f \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438.  +++$+++ Тодоре, към санстефанска България се включват и Пирот и Враня в днешна Сърбия. Ако имаш време и желание някой ден, я оправи. [[User:VMORO|VMORO]] 10:38, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
538682 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538681 +++$+++ 538681 +++$+++ 2006-01-04 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.136429520E09 +++$+++ \u0429\u0435 \u044f \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u044f \u043e\u0449\u0435 \u0443\u0442\u0440\u0435, \u043d\u0435\u0449\u043e \u0441\u044a\u043c \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043b. \u0411\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u044f, \u0447\u0435 \u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]]  +++$+++ : Ще я оправя още утре, нещо съм недогледал. Благодаря, че каза. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]] [[User:TodorBozhinov|→ Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov]] [[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→ Talk]] 18:52, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
538683 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538681 +++$+++ 538682 +++$+++ 2006-01-04 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.136431860E09 +++$+++ \u041f\u043e\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0445 \u0433\u0440\u0435\u0448\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0432\u0435\u0447\u0435. \u0425\u0430\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0432\u0430\u0442 \u043b\u0438 \u0442\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043c\u0438 \u0438\u043d\u0430\u0447\u0435? \u0410\u043a\u043e \u0438\u043c\u0430\u0448 \u043d\u044f\u043a\u0430\u043a\u0432\u0438 \u0438\u0434\u0435\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u043a\u0432\u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u044f, \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e \u043a\u0430\u0436\u0438. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]]  +++$+++ :: Поправих грешката вече. Харесват ли ти картите ми иначе? Ако имаш някакви идеи какви други да правя, само кажи. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]] [[User:TodorBozhinov|→ Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov]] [[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→ Talk]] 19:31, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
538684 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538681 +++$+++ 538681 +++$+++ 2006-01-11 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.137035820E09 +++$+++ I'm not the author of this article, the text was pasted at [[Rousse]] and I decided to move it to a separate entry, since it was too detailed for the city article. I didn't know it was a copyright violation, but I don't think I have any guilt or something, and this must be some kind of mistake. I know the rules here and respect them, and I'm not a newcomer. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]]  +++$+++ : I'm not the author of this article, the text was pasted at [[Rousse]] and I decided to move it to a separate entry, since it was too detailed for the city article. I didn't know it was a copyright violation, but I don't think I have any guilt or something, and this must be some kind of mistake. I know the rules here and respect them, and I'm not a newcomer. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]] [[User:TodorBozhinov|→ Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov]] [[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→ Talk]] 19:17, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

14395 +++$+++ SMasters +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-01 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.309531200E09 +++$+++ Hi The ed17, it has been nearly a month since I wrote to you regarding your TC nomination. I'm not sure if you are still keen to pursue this. You need to provide evidence to support your nom. I understand if you are busy and do not have the time to do this. I'm just letting you know that I will clear the nom on 6 July 2011 (1 month since original nomination), if no action is taken to move it forward. When you have the time, you can renominate it again. Thanks and best wishes. \u2013 ''' +++$+++ Hi The ed17, it has been nearly a month since I wrote to you regarding your TC nomination. I'm not sure if you are still keen to pursue this. You need to provide evidence to support your nom. I understand if you are busy and do not have the time to do this. I'm just letting you know that I will clear the nom on 6 July 2011 (1 month since original nomination), if no action is taken to move it forward. When you have the time, you can renominate it again. Thanks and best wishes. – '''[[User:SMasters|SMasters]]''' ([[User talk:SMasters#top|talk]]) 07:40, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
14396 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14395 +++$+++ 14395 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.309569120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reminding me, I'll try to get to it asap, but if I don't, I'm fine with you removing it. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks for reminding me, I'll try to get to it asap, but if I don't, I'm fine with you removing it. Regards, [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 18:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

14397 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-02 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.309600380E09 +++$+++ Just a spotcheck, I've added a lot more sources to [[Military history of the Russian Empire|the article]], do you think that the sourcing, as is, is suitable? Those books are taking ''forever'' to arrive, unfortunately. There are a few topics that are, so far, only covered in Stone, for instance the underrated M\xfcnnich. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"#333\"> +++$+++ Just a spotcheck, I've added a lot more sources to [[Military history of the Russian Empire|the article]], do you think that the sourcing, as is, is suitable? Those books are taking ''forever'' to arrive, unfortunately. There are a few topics that are, so far, only covered in Stone, for instance the underrated Münnich. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#444">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 02:53, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
14398 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14397 +++$+++ 14397 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.309601520E09 +++$+++ Also, there's a Military history of [x] during World War II for all of the major powers, but none for Russia! I seen [[WP:FOUR|an opportunity here]] ;) <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"#333\"> +++$+++ :Also, there's a Military history of [x] during World War II for all of the major powers, but none for Russia! I seen [[WP:FOUR|an opportunity here]] ;) <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#444">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 03:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
14399 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14397 +++$+++ 14398 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.309602720E09 +++$+++ ''Much'' better. I'd prefer at least one more book that focuses on the entire military history of Russia (to ensure you get a balanced perspective), though. Re WWII, good god, g'luck. You will have a lot of source discrepancies with communist histories vs. western histories vs. revisionist histories vs. modern scholarly works. I'd recommend a healthy dose of [[WP:REFGROUP|explanatory notes]] for the differences, similar to what I did in [[Brazilian cruiser Bahia#Loss]] except much more complex. :-)  +++$+++ ::''Much'' better. I'd prefer at least one more book that focuses on the entire military history of Russia (to ensure you get a balanced perspective), though. Re WWII, good god, g'luck. You will have a lot of source discrepancies with communist histories vs. western histories vs. revisionist histories vs. modern scholarly works. I'd recommend a healthy dose of [[WP:REFGROUP|explanatory notes]] for the differences, similar to what I did in [[Brazilian cruiser Bahia#Loss]] except much more complex. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 03:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
14400 +++$+++ Resident_Mario +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14397 +++$+++ 14399 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.309606560E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, the [http:\/\/catalog.brooklynpubliclibrary.org\/search~S63?\/c947+D\/c947+d\/-3%2C-1%2C0%2CE\/frameset&FF=c947+d&5%2C%2C5 best reference] is in central storage :\/. As for WWII, now that I have this system worked out, I can just get a stack of books together and pile through it; although you're right, it'll probably be harder then I thought it would. But the article still deserves to exist, so...<span style=\"font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica\"><b><font color=\"#333\"> +++$+++ :::Unfortunately, the [http://catalog.brooklynpubliclibrary.org/search~S63?/c947+D/c947+d/-3%2C-1%2C0%2CE/frameset&FF=c947+d&5%2C%2C5 best reference] is in central storage :/. As for WWII, now that I have this system worked out, I can just get a stack of books together and pile through it; although you're right, it'll probably be harder then I thought it would. But the article still deserves to exist, so...<span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#444">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 04:36, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
14401 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14397 +++$+++ 14400 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.309663440E09 +++$+++ Wow, the cheapest I found online for that book was $75. All but one were over $100. Do any other NY libraries have it? Like I said, good luck with the WWII article. The only other advice I have is to try to get references from Russia and the West that also go from the Cold War to today. The CW, or more specifically anti-Communism, tended to influence many historians during that time.  +++$+++ ::::Wow, the cheapest I found online for that book was $75. All but one were over $100. Do any other NY libraries have it? Like I said, good luck with the WWII article. The only other advice I have is to try to get references from Russia and the West that also go from the Cold War to today. The CW, or more specifically anti-Communism, tended to influence many historians during that time. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 20:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

538686 +++$+++ Psy_guy +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-29 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.138583460E09 +++$+++ How you don't mind but I have moved Image:Trojan-manastir-1876.jpg to Commons under Category:Troyan monastery I created yesterday.  If you have more info on Troyan I hope you will share.  I am working on the article in my sandbox but most of my knowledge is on the main church and I am sad to say my knowledge is little.  Mostly,  I want to work on the pics.  See you around.  --   +++$+++ How you don't mind but I have moved Image:Trojan-manastir-1876.jpg to Commons under Category:Troyan monastery I created yesterday.  If you have more info on Troyan I hope you will share.  I am working on the article in my sandbox but most of my knowledge is on the main church and I am sad to say my knowledge is little.  Mostly,  I want to work on the pics.  See you around.  --  [[User:Psy guy|Psy guy]] <sup>[[User_talk:Psy_guy|Talk]]</sup> 17:11, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
538687 +++$+++ Psy_guy +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538686 +++$+++ 538686 +++$+++ 2006-01-29 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.138595700E09 +++$+++ I have done some work on the monastery article.  Let me know what you think.  --   +++$+++ :I have done some work on the monastery article.  Let me know what you think.  --  [[User:Psy guy|Psy guy]] <sup>[[User_talk:Psy_guy|Talk]]</sup> 20:35, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

276543 +++$+++ SqueakBox +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276543 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-17 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.124281260E09 +++$+++ Nice edit to remember him 43 years after his senseless death,  +++$+++ Nice edit to remember him 43 years after his senseless death, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 05:21, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
276544 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276543 +++$+++ 276543 +++$+++ 2005-08-17 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.124282880E09 +++$+++ Why, thank you! You're right, it should never have happened; what a shame. I think we have a duty to make such \"memorials\". -- +++$+++ :Why, thank you! You're right, it should never have happened; what a shame. I think we have a duty to make such "memorials". --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 05:48, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

could not match георги антонов
538689 +++$+++ георги антонов +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-05 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.139207160E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Георги Антонов|Георги Антонов]] 22:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
538690 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538689 +++$+++ 538689 +++$+++ 2006-02-05 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.139207220E09 +++$+++ \u0418\u043c\u0430 \u043e\u0449\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u044f, \u043d\u043e \u0449\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0430 \u0443\u0442\u0440\u0435, \u0447\u0435 \u0441\u0435\u0433\u0430 \u0441\u044a\u043c \u0443\u043c\u043e\u0440\u0435\u043d. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]]  +++$+++ : Има още да се оправя, но ще погледна утре, че сега съм уморен. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]] [[User:TodorBozhinov|→ Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov]] [[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]] 22:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

14402 +++$+++ AustralianRupert +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-02 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.309649700E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid lightsteelblue;\" | The ''WikiChevrons'' are hereby bestowed upon The_ed17 for his efforts in the June 2011 [[WP:MILCON|Military History monthly article writing Contest]], placing equal first with a total of 21 points from one article. Well done! Cheers,   +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid lightsteelblue;" | The ''WikiChevrons'' are hereby bestowed upon The_ed17 for his efforts in the June 2011 [[WP:MILCON|Military History monthly article writing Contest]], placing equal first with a total of 21 points from one article. Well done! Cheers,  [[User:AustralianRupert|AustralianRupert]] ([[User talk:AustralianRupert|talk]]) 16:35, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
14403 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14402 +++$+++ 14402 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.309663440E09 +++$+++ Thanks Rupert, much appreciated.  +++$+++ :Thanks Rupert, much appreciated. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 20:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

could not match георги антонов
538691 +++$+++ георги антонов +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538691 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-07 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.139341200E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Георги Антонов|Георги Антонов]] 11:40, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
538692 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538691 +++$+++ 538691 +++$+++ 2006-02-07 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.139345160E09 +++$+++ \u0410\u043c\u0438 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u044f \u043c\u0430\u0445\u043d\u0435\u0448. \u0421\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0434 \u043c\u0435\u043d \u0442\u0440\u044f\u0431\u0432\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u043e\u0440\u0433\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0437\u0438\u0440\u0430\u0448 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0430\u0433\u0440\u0430\u0444\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u043e-\u0440\u0430\u0437\u043b\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e, \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0430 \u043f\u043e-\u0435\u043d\u0446\u0438\u043a\u043b\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0434\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0432\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0448 wikilink \u0432\u0440\u044a\u0437\u043a\u0438 \u0432 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 (\u043f\u043e \u0435\u0434\u043d\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u0435\u043a\u0442), \u0447\u0435 \u043d\u044f\u043c\u0430 \u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043a\u0432\u0438. \u0414\u0440\u0443\u0433\u043e\u0442\u043e \u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0435 \u0438\u043d\u0430\u0447\u0435, \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0430 \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u044f, \u043c\u0430\u043a\u0430\u0440 \u0447\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043c \u043f\u0430\u043a. \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438, [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]]  +++$+++ : Ами може да я махнеш. Според мен трябва да организираш параграфите по-различно, да са по-енциклопедични заглавията и да направиш wikilink връзки в долната част на статията (по една за обект), че няма никакви. Другото е добре иначе, така мисля, макар че може да поогледам пак. Поздрави, [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]] [[User:TodorBozhinov|→ Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov]] [[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]] 12:46, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

14404 +++$+++ Sturmvogel 66 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.309678200E09 +++$+++ Ed, we need to standardize our formatting for refs and citations. All the journals cited are going to need place of publication and publisher. Since we have no authors with multiple books in our refs, I see no need to provide a title with each cite and am just using author, p. #. I just got Stillwell from ILL and am reminded why I'm not so fond of Friedman's books. Anyways, I wanted to ask how you want to handle the modernizations? I tend to put them in chronological order like I did with the Renown and Repulse articles, but I've also placed them in the basic descriptive paragraphs as appropriate. What do you think?-- +++$+++ Ed, we need to standardize our formatting for refs and citations. All the journals cited are going to need place of publication and publisher. Since we have no authors with multiple books in our refs, I see no need to provide a title with each cite and am just using author, p. #. I just got Stillwell from ILL and am reminded why I'm not so fond of Friedman's books. Anyways, I wanted to ask how you want to handle the modernizations? I tend to put them in chronological order like I did with the Renown and Repulse articles, but I've also placed them in the basic descriptive paragraphs as appropriate. What do you think?--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 00:30, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
14405 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14404 +++$+++ 14404 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.309703940E09 +++$+++ I'm not bothered by author, page#, I'm just used to going by [[TCMOS|''Chicago'']] style. All my history professors required it for my papers in the last three semesters and I got in the habit of writing out the citations. Whichever way you want is fine by me. Stillwell provides a lot of information we're not going to use, but it's certainly a bit more interesting than Friedman's design-oriented histories :-) I usually put modernizations in chronological order and save the dirty details for the class article, so the ship articles are focused on the service history and the class articles are focused on the design history. So yes, chronological is fine with me haha  +++$+++ :I'm not bothered by author, page#, I'm just used to going by [[TCMOS|''Chicago'']] style. All my history professors required it for my papers in the last three semesters and I got in the habit of writing out the citations. Whichever way you want is fine by me. Stillwell provides a lot of information we're not going to use, but it's certainly a bit more interesting than Friedman's design-oriented histories :-) I usually put modernizations in chronological order and save the dirty details for the class article, so the ship articles are focused on the service history and the class articles are focused on the design history. So yes, chronological is fine with me haha [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 07:39, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
14406 +++$+++ Sturmvogel 66 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14404 +++$+++ 14405 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.310251560E09 +++$+++ I think that JSTOR has access to these two articles that we probably need to reference: John F. De Virgilio. Seven Seconds to Infamy, Naval Institute Proceedings, 123(12) Dec. 97, pp. 62-65 and Rodgaard, John, et al. Death of the Arizona, Naval History 15(6) Dec. 01, pp. 22-28. Email copies to me if you can get them, if not let me know and we can figure out how else to get them.-- +++$+++ :: I think that JSTOR has access to these two articles that we probably need to reference: John F. De Virgilio. Seven Seconds to Infamy, Naval Institute Proceedings, 123(12) Dec. 97, pp. 62-65 and Rodgaard, John, et al. Death of the Arizona, Naval History 15(6) Dec. 01, pp. 22-28. Email copies to me if you can get them, if not let me know and we can figure out how else to get them.--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 15:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
14407 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14404 +++$+++ 14406 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.310252340E09 +++$+++ NMU's site seems to be broken at the moment, but I think that's because they've overhauled the whole library's site. From memory they have old ''Proceedings'' in print form, so I should be able to get it assuming it's not in storage. I don't think they'll have the other one, but again, that's from memory &ndash; I'll try again tomorrow or Monday (I'm still in Boston and I'm flying back tomorrow!)  +++$+++ :::NMU's site seems to be broken at the moment, but I think that's because they've overhauled the whole library's site. From memory they have old ''Proceedings'' in print form, so I should be able to get it assuming it's not in storage. I don't think they'll have the other one, but again, that's from memory &ndash; I'll try again tomorrow or Monday (I'm still in Boston and I'm flying back tomorrow!) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 15:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
14408 +++$+++ Sturmvogel 66 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14404 +++$+++ 14407 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310256960E09 +++$+++ No hurries, I'm not exactly working at frentic pace myself.-- +++$+++ ::::No hurries, I'm not exactly working at frentic pace myself.--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 17:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

could not match георги антонов
538693 +++$+++ георги антонов +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538693 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-07 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.139349840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Георги Антонов|Георги Антонов]] 14:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
538694 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538693 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-07 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.139353200E09 +++$+++ \u0421\u0443\u043f\u0435\u0440 :) \u0410\u043c\u0438 \u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0432 \u043c\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430 \u0438\u043c\u0430\u043c\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043d\u0438 \u043e\u0442\u0434\u0435\u043b\u043d\u0438 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f, \u043e\u0442 \u043a\u043e\u0438\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0430\u0439-\u0432\u0430\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0442\u043e \u0442\u0440\u044f\u0431\u0432\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0437\u044e\u043c\u0438\u0440\u0430 \u0432 [[History of Bulgaria]], \u043d\u043e \u0432\u0438\u0436 \u043a\u0430\u043a\u0432\u043e \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0448 \u0434\u0430 \u0434\u043e\u043f\u044a\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0448 \u043f\u043e \u0432\u0441\u044f\u043a\u0430 \u0435\u0434\u043d\u0430 \u043e\u0442 \u0442\u044f\u0445. \u0410\u0437 \u0441\u044a\u0449\u043e \u0441\u0435 \u0440\u0430\u0434\u0432\u0430\u043c \u0430\u0434\u0441\u043a\u0438, \u0447\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u0421\u043e\u0444\u0438\u044f \u0443\u0441\u043f\u044f \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u043f\u0435\u0447\u0435\u043b\u0438. \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438, [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]]  +++$+++ ::: Супер :) Ами ние в момента имаме доста подробни отделни статии за историята на България, от които най-важното трябва да се резюмира в [[History of Bulgaria]], но виж какво можеш да допълниш по всяка една от тях. Аз също се радвам адски, че статията за София успя да спечели. Поздрави, [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]] [[User:TodorBozhinov|→ Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov]] [[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]] 15:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

276550 +++$+++ Chris j wood +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-26 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.125077640E09 +++$+++ A quick look at the manual of style doesn't seem to reveal any particular mandated section order, other than that intro section comes first. Could you point me at the standard you are referring to. Thanks. --  +++$+++ A quick look at the manual of style doesn't seem to reveal any particular mandated section order, other than that intro section comes first. Could you point me at the standard you are referring to. Thanks. -- [[User:Chris j wood|Chris j wood]] 10:34, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
276551 +++$+++ Chris j wood +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276550 +++$+++ 276550 +++$+++ 2005-08-26 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.125101460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply; the preferred order is rather well buried in the text and I'd never noticed it there. I too think that references and external links serve quite different purposes; to my mind references is there to back up the facts reported in the article (in effect an audit trail of where the article contents came from), whilst external links is a pointer to additional information possibly relevant to the subject of the article but not appropriate for inclusion. --  +++$+++ :Thanks for your reply; the preferred order is rather well buried in the text and I'd never noticed it there. I too think that references and external links serve quite different purposes; to my mind references is there to back up the facts reported in the article (in effect an audit trail of where the article contents came from), whilst external links is a pointer to additional information possibly relevant to the subject of the article but not appropriate for inclusion. -- [[User:Chris j wood|Chris j wood]] 17:11, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

538695 +++$+++ Essjay +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-07 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.139363340E09 +++$+++ Actually, the image isn't mine; it was taken by [[User:Psy guy]] on his trip to Bulgaria. He emailed me when he returned to say that he had taken several images that fit with my theme of \"Grace, Light, and Peace\" (I change up the images on my user\/talk page occasionally, but always pick ones that fit with that theme). I'm thrilled to see it up as a featured pic though! <font color=#696969>[[User:Essjay|Essjay]] <sup>[[User talk:Essjay|''Talk'']] \u2022  +++$+++ Actually, the image isn't mine; it was taken by [[User:Psy guy]] on his trip to Bulgaria. He emailed me when he returned to say that he had taken several images that fit with my theme of "Grace, Light, and Peace" (I change up the images on my user/talk page occasionally, but always pick ones that fit with that theme). I'm thrilled to see it up as a featured pic though! <font color=#696969>[[User:Essjay|Essjay]] <sup>[[User talk:Essjay|''Talk'']] • [[User:Essjay/Contact|''Contact'']]</sup></font> 17:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
538696 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538695 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-07 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.139364480E09 +++$+++ Yes, I've messed things up a bit with the author, I'm sorry. The picture's receiving very nice comments at the nominations, which is pleasing :) I also think it fits perfectly with the theme and general design of your user page. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]]  +++$+++ :: Yes, I've messed things up a bit with the author, I'm sorry. The picture's receiving very nice comments at the nominations, which is pleasing :) I also think it fits perfectly with the theme and general design of your user page. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]] [[User:TodorBozhinov|→ Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov]] [[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]] 18:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
538697 +++$+++ Essjay +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538695 +++$+++ 538695 +++$+++ 2006-02-07 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.139365260E09 +++$+++ I copypasted your message over to Psy guy, he'll see it next time he signs on, so no worries. I appreciate your kind words, and I'll go have a look at the nomination, if I can find it! <font color=#696969>[[User:Essjay|Essjay]] <sup>[[User talk:Essjay|''Talk'']] \u2022  +++$+++ :I copypasted your message over to Psy guy, he'll see it next time he signs on, so no worries. I appreciate your kind words, and I'll go have a look at the nomination, if I can find it! <font color=#696969>[[User:Essjay|Essjay]] <sup>[[User talk:Essjay|''Talk'']] • [[User:Essjay/Contact|''Contact'']]</sup></font> 18:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
538698 +++$+++ Cryout +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538695 +++$+++ 538695 +++$+++ 2006-02-07 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.139370060E09 +++$+++ \u0411\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u044f \u0437\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u044f\u0441\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u0442\u043e. \u0414\u043e \u0441\u0435\u0433\u0430 \u0441\u044a\u043c \u0431\u0438\u043b \u043f\u043e-\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u0435\u043d \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0442\u043d\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043e\u043a\u0430 (\u0430\u043d\u0433->\u0411\u0413), \u043d\u043e \u0438\u043c\u0430 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u0435\u0441\u0435 \u0437\u0430 \u043b\u0438\u0446\u0435\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0438 \u043a\u044a\u043c \u0441\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0430... \u0438 \u041a\u0430\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u043b\u043e\u0432 \u0435 \u043d\u0435\u043c\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0436\u043d\u0430 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442 \u043e\u0442 \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430. \u0421\u0430\u043c\u043e \u0441\u0435 \u0438\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043d\u044f\u0432\u0430\u043c, \u0447\u0435 \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0438\u0448\u0430 \u0434\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0438 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0438. -- +++$+++ : Благодаря за пояснението. До сега съм бил по-активен в обратна посока (анг->БГ), но има доста да се допринесе за лицето ни към света... и Каравелов е немаловажна част от това. Само се извинявам, че не пиша дълги статии. --[[User:Cryout|Cryout]] 19:41, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

276552 +++$+++ Mamawrites +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-27 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.125140100E09 +++$+++ Please vote for the [[American Civil Rights Movement]] in the nominations for the Article Improvement Drive. [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Article_Improvement_Drive#Nominated_in_August_or_later:_Need_4_votes_a_week_to_stay Click here and scroll down to (Nominated in August or later: American Civil Rights Movement... to cast your vote]]. Thanks!  +++$+++ Please vote for the [[American Civil Rights Movement]] in the nominations for the Article Improvement Drive. [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Improvement_Drive#Nominated_in_August_or_later:_Need_4_votes_a_week_to_stay Click here and scroll down to (Nominated in August or later: American Civil Rights Movement... to cast your vote]]. Thanks! [[User:Mamawrites|Mamawrites]] 03:55, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
276553 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276552 +++$+++ 276552 +++$+++ 2005-09-06 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.126004460E09 +++$+++ Let's bring this to [[Talk:ANZUS]]. -- +++$+++ :Let's bring this to [[Talk:ANZUS]]. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 04:01, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

439308 +++$+++ Amsaim +++$+++ JamesBWatson +++$+++ 439308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-06 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312653240E09 +++$+++ Hi there. You semi-protected the [[Seal (musician)]] article, which is good, however you left the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Seal_%28musician%29&diff=443196459&oldid=443161354 obvious vandalism] of the vandalising IP editor on the same page. S\/he adamantly writes nonsense into the image caption field of the infobox: \"''Seal with Rich Alderwick in Frankfurt, Germany (2006), performing at the \"concert against Amsaim\".\"'' Concert against Amsaim? What kind of nonsense is that? This is not edit warring\/content dispute but blatant vandalism. I have thusly removed this disruptive edit. Thank you.  +++$+++ Hi there. You semi-protected the [[Seal (musician)]] article, which is good, however you left the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Seal_%28musician%29&diff=443196459&oldid=443161354 obvious vandalism] of the vandalising IP editor on the same page. S/he adamantly writes nonsense into the image caption field of the infobox: "''Seal with Rich Alderwick in Frankfurt, Germany (2006), performing at the "concert against Amsaim"."'' Concert against Amsaim? What kind of nonsense is that? This is not edit warring/content dispute but blatant vandalism. I have thusly removed this disruptive edit. Thank you. [[User:Amsaim|Amsaim]] ([[User talk:Amsaim|talk]]) 10:54, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
439309 +++$+++ JamesBWatson +++$+++ JamesBWatson +++$+++ 439308 +++$+++ 439308 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.312653480E09 +++$+++ You are quite right. I didn't notice that the name \"Amsaim\" in the edits was the same as the name of another editor who had edited the article. Thanks for pointing it out.  +++$+++ :You are quite right. I didn't notice that the name "Amsaim" in the edits was the same as the name of another editor who had edited the article. Thanks for pointing it out. [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top|talk]]) 10:58, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

14410 +++$+++ PMG +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14410 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.309819260E09 +++$+++ I see this error many, many time on en.wiki ships. It`s very annoying. 100 mm or 102 mm, 406 or 410 mm, and so on. +++$+++ I see this error many, many time on en.wiki ships. It`s very annoying. 100 mm or 102 mm, 406 or 410 mm, and so on.[[User:PMG|PMG]] ([[User talk:PMG|talk]]) 15:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
14411 +++$+++ Sturmvogel 66 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14410 +++$+++ 14410 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.309839420E09 +++$+++ Those are rounding errors. The template will round off itself to the number of digits in the input. For inch measurements that typically means 1 or 2 digits, thus 4 inches is converted to 100 mm rather than 102 mm and 12 inches to 300 mm rather than 305 mm. The thing to do is to force the template not to round at all by adding \"|0\" to it.-- +++$+++ :Those are rounding errors. The template will round off itself to the number of digits in the input. For inch measurements that typically means 1 or 2 digits, thus 4 inches is converted to 100 mm rather than 102 mm and 12 inches to 300 mm rather than 305 mm. The thing to do is to force the template not to round at all by adding "|0" to it.--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 21:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
14412 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14410 +++$+++ 14411 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.309872360E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sturm, that's exactly why it's wrong. I'm not a huge fan of the convert template.  +++$+++ ::Thanks Sturm, that's exactly why it's wrong. I'm not a huge fan of the convert template. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:26, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
14413 +++$+++ PMG +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14410 +++$+++ 14412 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 10:26:00 +++$+++ 1.309886760E09 +++$+++ And I am really suprised that article with such errors can be featured. For me as a ''cm\/mm citizen'' this is such errors as lets say \"ship have 8 guns cal. 410 mm\" vs. \"ship have 8 guns cal. 406 mm\" is very big error. And if its additionaly with \"ref\" is \"wrong error\" :).  +++$+++ :::And I am really suprised that article with such errors can be featured. For me as a ''cm/mm citizen'' this is such errors as lets say "ship have 8 guns cal. 410 mm" vs. "ship have 8 guns cal. 406 mm" is very big error. And if its additionaly with "ref" is "wrong error" :). [[User:PMG|PMG]] ([[User talk:PMG|talk]]) 10:26, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
14414 +++$+++ Sturmvogel 66 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14410 +++$+++ 14413 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.309888260E09 +++$+++ I doubt a bot could fix these as the template works just fine for measurements like 3 inches (76mm), etc. And the whole issues is also complicated because many guns have nominal calibers that differ from the real size of the shells. Forex German 28 cm guns are really 28.3 cm in diameter while their 15 cm guns are really 14.91 cm. As in most things Wiki, if you've identified what you think is a problem, then it's up to you to fix it, plus whoever else you can persuade to work with you.-- +++$+++ ::::I doubt a bot could fix these as the template works just fine for measurements like 3 inches (76mm), etc. And the whole issues is also complicated because many guns have nominal calibers that differ from the real size of the shells. Forex German 28 cm guns are really 28.3 cm in diameter while their 15 cm guns are really 14.91 cm. As in most things Wiki, if you've identified what you think is a problem, then it's up to you to fix it, plus whoever else you can persuade to work with you.--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 10:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
14415 +++$+++ PMG +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14410 +++$+++ 14414 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.309925160E09 +++$+++ So maybe use it for special values? For example this 4 or 16 inches? I am quite sure that ''every \"convert\" template with 4 and 16 inch value in Ships category'' should be 102\/406 mm not 100\/410 mm. And if somebody already put that convert template then its not special case as you say with that German guns.  +++$+++ :::::So maybe use it for special values? For example this 4 or 16 inches? I am quite sure that ''every "convert" template with 4 and 16 inch value in Ships category'' should be 102/406 mm not 100/410 mm. And if somebody already put that convert template then its not special case as you say with that German guns. [[User:PMG|PMG]] ([[User talk:PMG|talk]]) 21:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

276556 +++$+++ Xinger +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-22 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.127386560E09 +++$+++ Out of line how?  Because I disagree with him?  There's been no stepping out of the guidelines.   +++$+++ Out of line how?  Because I disagree with him?  There's been no stepping out of the guidelines.  [[User:Xinger|Xinger]] 03:56, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
276557 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276556 +++$+++ 276556 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.127388120E09 +++$+++ Madchester has clearly stated that you violated the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]]. I only cared myself when I noticed you had done that. That isn't a guideline, that's a '''policy''', and it's enforceable, as has been done. Please consider this in the spirit of a friendly warning that you are taking things ''much'' too seriously. -- +++$+++ :Madchester has clearly stated that you violated the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]]. I only cared myself when I noticed you had done that. That isn't a guideline, that's a '''policy''', and it's enforceable, as has been done. Please consider this in the spirit of a friendly warning that you are taking things ''much'' too seriously. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 04:22, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

276558 +++$+++ Xinger +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-22 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.127389080E09 +++$+++ If you'd take another look I clearly didn't violate the three-revert rule.  \"Do not revert any single page in whole or in part more than three times in 24 hours\".  I did THREE reverts, not four, and was blocked.   +++$+++ If you'd take another look I clearly didn't violate the three-revert rule.  "Do not revert any single page in whole or in part more than three times in 24 hours".  I did THREE reverts, not four, and was blocked.  [[User:Xinger|Xinger]] 04:38, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
276559 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276558 +++$+++ 276558 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.127399400E09 +++$+++ I hope you'll at least try, grudgingly as it may become you, to argue your case for a pointless formatting issue to lead to an edit war. Rest assured your choice of battles here makes you look incredibly petty and small-minded. -- +++$+++ :I hope you'll at least try, grudgingly as it may become you, to argue your case for a pointless formatting issue to lead to an edit war. Rest assured your choice of battles here makes you look incredibly petty and small-minded. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 07:30, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

14416 +++$+++ PMG +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14416 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.309827360E09 +++$+++ [[List of battlecruisers of Germany]] - in \"key\" paragraph there is no \"Fate\" description.  +++$+++ [[List of battlecruisers of Germany]] - in "key" paragraph there is no "Fate" description. [[User:PMG|PMG]] ([[User talk:PMG|talk]]) 17:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
14417 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14416 +++$+++ 14416 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.309872360E09 +++$+++ \"The five remaining battlecruisers\u2014Von der Tann, Moltke, Seydlitz, Derfflinger, and Hindenburg\u2014were interned with the bulk of the German fleet at Scapa Flow following the end of the war and subsequently scuttled by their crews in 1919\" <-- I think that's their fate?  +++$+++ :"The five remaining battlecruisers—Von der Tann, Moltke, Seydlitz, Derfflinger, and Hindenburg—were interned with the bulk of the German fleet at Scapa Flow following the end of the war and subsequently scuttled by their crews in 1919" <-- I think that's their fate? [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:26, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
14418 +++$+++ PMG +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14416 +++$+++ 14417 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.309886400E09 +++$+++ No, no. Look - [[List_of_battlecruisers_of_Japan#Key]] there is \"Fate\". [[List_of_battlecruisers_of_Germany#Key]] is not. But in next tables there is \"Fate\" part ([[List_of_battlecruisers_of_Germany#SMS_Von_der_Tann]]). So in my opinion \"Key\" part (legend of table) of article should have the same parameters as in Japan article. I won`t add this because my pl->en skills are not so good as en->pl, and thats why I want avoid adding anything more than interwiki and categories to en.wiki.  +++$+++ ::No, no. Look - [[List_of_battlecruisers_of_Japan#Key]] there is "Fate". [[List_of_battlecruisers_of_Germany#Key]] is not. But in next tables there is "Fate" part ([[List_of_battlecruisers_of_Germany#SMS_Von_der_Tann]]). So in my opinion "Key" part (legend of table) of article should have the same parameters as in Japan article. I won`t add this because my pl->en skills are not so good as en->pl, and thats why I want avoid adding anything more than interwiki and categories to en.wiki. [[User:PMG|PMG]] ([[User talk:PMG|talk]]) 10:20, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

14419 +++$+++ Nick-D +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14419 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.309855860E09 +++$+++ Hi Ed, Adding links to relevant book reviews published elsewhere is a great idea. I've just added another one and will include this in the future.  +++$+++ Hi Ed, Adding links to relevant book reviews published elsewhere is a great idea. I've just added another one and will include this in the future. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 01:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
14420 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14419 +++$+++ 14419 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.309872360E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you like it, I thought about it today and hoped you wouldn't mind me adding it without your consent. :-)  +++$+++ :I'm glad you like it, I thought about it today and hoped you wouldn't mind me adding it without your consent. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:26, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

14421 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309996440E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to let you know that as far as the A class standards for articles WPUS already accepts the criteria used by WPMILHIST. -- +++$+++ I just wanted to let you know that as far as the A class standards for articles WPUS already accepts the criteria used by WPMILHIST. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 16:54, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
14422 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14421 +++$+++ 14421 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310459340E09 +++$+++ Okay thanks, I'll keep a lookout for US articles that are A-class in Milhist.  +++$+++ :Okay thanks, I'll keep a lookout for US articles that are A-class in Milhist. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 01:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

538710 +++$+++ Kcordina +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-20 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.140482640E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I notice you are putting some articles into the newly created ''Geography of Livingston Island'' category - good work!  You'll find there are _lots_ of articles that will fit into that category [[user:Apcbg|Apcbg]] has created lots of such articles, so his contribution list is a good source of articles that may fit.  I'm in the process of copyediting them all into a wiki form - I'll make sure I add your category to new ones that I create.  +++$+++ Hi.  I notice you are putting some articles into the newly created ''Geography of Livingston Island'' category - good work!  You'll find there are _lots_ of articles that will fit into that category [[user:Apcbg|Apcbg]] has created lots of such articles, so his contribution list is a good source of articles that may fit.  I'm in the process of copyediting them all into a wiki form - I'll make sure I add your category to new ones that I create. [[User:Kcordina|Kcordina]] 16:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
538711 +++$+++ Kcordina +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538710 +++$+++ 538710 +++$+++ 2006-02-20 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.140483420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your note.  I have been adding the bulgarian-named places template to the articles as I copyedit them.  Any other articles by Apcbg will be copyedit'd by me at some point, so I can add the category as I do them.  If you work your way through the ones with the template (ie. ones I've already copyedit'd) and I'll do the rest as I copyedit them. That we should avoid duplication.  And yes, I agree we also need a category for greenwich island places.  +++$+++ : Thanks for your note.  I have been adding the bulgarian-named places template to the articles as I copyedit them.  Any other articles by Apcbg will be copyedit'd by me at some point, so I can add the category as I do them.  If you work your way through the ones with the template (ie. ones I've already copyedit'd) and I'll do the rest as I copyedit them. That we should avoid duplication.  And yes, I agree we also need a category for greenwich island places. [[User:Kcordina|Kcordina]] 16:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

276567 +++$+++ ElectricRay +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276567 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-03 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.138998180E09 +++$+++ Quoth [[User:ElectricRay|ElectricRay]]: Utter hogwash. Whilst in the context of the Green Day example, there was an implied reference to ''the members of Green Day'' (i.e., a plural), meaning it ''did'' make sense to use the plural (\"Green Day\" the entity is abstract and can't itself be interviewed; only its members can) - and this has now been corrected to that the article mentions ''the members of...'' explicitly -  using a plural formulation of a verb to refer to a singular subject, be it a company, a band, a collective, or any other single entity, whether or not it has a suggestion of collectivity about it, is flat out wrong, in British, American, or any other form of English. It's common, sure, but then so is the misuse of the apostrophe. It's still an error. --  +++$+++ Quoth [[User:ElectricRay|ElectricRay]]: Utter hogwash. Whilst in the context of the Green Day example, there was an implied reference to ''the members of Green Day'' (i.e., a plural), meaning it ''did'' make sense to use the plural ("Green Day" the entity is abstract and can't itself be interviewed; only its members can) - and this has now been corrected to that the article mentions ''the members of...'' explicitly -  using a plural formulation of a verb to refer to a singular subject, be it a company, a band, a collective, or any other single entity, whether or not it has a suggestion of collectivity about it, is flat out wrong, in British, American, or any other form of English. It's common, sure, but then so is the misuse of the apostrophe. It's still an error. -- [[User:ElectricRay|ElectricRay]] 12:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
276568 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276567 +++$+++ 276567 +++$+++ 2006-02-03 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.139023140E09 +++$+++ Sorry you feel so vehement about it. I feel my position on this edit is supported by sources, while yours seems supported by the strength of your emotions (six months later you come back to flame? sheesh). [http:\/\/www.yaelf.com\/aueFAQ\/mifcompnyvscompnyr.shtml] -- +++$+++ :Sorry you feel so vehement about it. I feel my position on this edit is supported by sources, while yours seems supported by the strength of your emotions (six months later you come back to flame? sheesh). [http://www.yaelf.com/aueFAQ/mifcompnyvscompnyr.shtml] --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 19:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
276569 +++$+++ ElectricRay +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276567 +++$+++ 276568 +++$+++ 2006-02-03 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.139038680E09 +++$+++ Happy Travels -- +++$+++ ::Happy Travels --[[User:ElectricRay|ElectricRay]] 23:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
276570 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276567 +++$+++ 276569 +++$+++ 2006-02-04 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.139041440E09 +++$+++ Mr. Prescriptivist, let me introduce you to [[Prescription and description|Mr. Descriptivist]]. I've met your type before. \"Wrong\" or not, it's quite clearly the favored form in British English at this point, as a Google of several band names with the attribute \"site:uk\" will quickly show. I admit I used more certainty than I should have (\"typically plural\" would be more correct), but I did not flame in my initial comment. As I noted, the fact that you're arguing a point of grammar with me six months after I completely forgot ''even what article'' was being referenced indicates that you have strong feelings about this that are not necessarily shared. I find that odd. In the end, it's just an encyclopedia. -- +++$+++ :::Mr. Prescriptivist, let me introduce you to [[Prescription and description|Mr. Descriptivist]]. I've met your type before. "Wrong" or not, it's quite clearly the favored form in British English at this point, as a Google of several band names with the attribute "site:uk" will quickly show. I admit I used more certainty than I should have ("typically plural" would be more correct), but I did not flame in my initial comment. As I noted, the fact that you're arguing a point of grammar with me six months after I completely forgot ''even what article'' was being referenced indicates that you have strong feelings about this that are not necessarily shared. I find that odd. In the end, it's just an encyclopedia. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 00:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
276571 +++$+++ ElectricRay +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276567 +++$+++ 276570 +++$+++ 2006-02-04 09:44:00 +++$+++ 1.139075040E09 +++$+++ You've obviously converted from prescriptivism to descriptivism in the last six months, then? As it happens, I would generally describe myself as the latter (I fully agree that language is a dynamic thing that evolves with usage and that rules are for pedants), but when the opportunity arises to out-prescribe a prescriber, I don't miss it. Nice attempt to discreetly shift your position 180 degrees to maintain the moral high-ground, though.  +++$+++ ::::You've obviously converted from prescriptivism to descriptivism in the last six months, then? As it happens, I would generally describe myself as the latter (I fully agree that language is a dynamic thing that evolves with usage and that rules are for pedants), but when the opportunity arises to out-prescribe a prescriber, I don't miss it. Nice attempt to discreetly shift your position 180 degrees to maintain the moral high-ground, though. [[User:ElectricRay|ElectricRay]] 09:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
276572 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276567 +++$+++ 276571 +++$+++ 2006-02-04 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.139108340E09 +++$+++ There's no inconsistency, and you're obviously incredibly seized by this business for some unknown reason. Take a deep breath, step away from the computer, get some fresh air, dude. I don't care anymore. -- +++$+++ :::::There's no inconsistency, and you're obviously incredibly seized by this business for some unknown reason. Take a deep breath, step away from the computer, get some fresh air, dude. I don't care anymore. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 18:59, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

14424 +++$+++ GorillaWarfare +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14424 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.310209440E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | You damn content editors... <span style=\"font-family: Georgia\">\u2013  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | You damn content editors... <span style="font-family: Georgia">– [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] <small>[[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]]</small></span> 04:04, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
14425 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14424 +++$+++ 14424 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310209500E09 +++$+++ [[Gran Torino|Get off my lawn]].  +++$+++ :[[Gran Torino|Get off my lawn]]. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 04:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

14426 +++$+++ Goldblooded +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.310263920E09 +++$+++ Stick your nose out of it, I wasnt insulting him i was responding to what he said, Theres no point of you making the situation worse.  +++$+++ Stick your nose out of it, I wasnt insulting him i was responding to what he said, Theres no point of you making the situation worse. [[User:Goldblooded|Goldblooded]] ([[User talk:Goldblooded|talk]]) 19:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
14427 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14426 +++$+++ 14426 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310264040E09 +++$+++ Feel free to not take my advice &ndash; that's your prerogative, of course. Just know that we're all trying to help, yet you're not listening.  +++$+++ :Feel free to not take my advice &ndash; that's your prerogative, of course. Just know that we're all trying to help, yet you're not listening. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 19:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

538716 +++$+++ Psy_guy +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538716 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-25 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.140873600E09 +++$+++ I have an important question to ask.  I recently uploaded this picture thinking that it is John of Rila; however, a commons user thinks that the image is of God the Father.  I was wondering if you could help me figure this out.  Click [[Commons:Image_talk:Saint_John_of_Rila_%28Ivan_Rilski%29.jpg|here]] for the image talk discussion.  I was under the impression that the Iconoclastic controversy determined that God the Father could not be represented on an icon.  If you have some insights, I would really appreciate it.  Thanks,  +++$+++ I have an important question to ask.  I recently uploaded this picture thinking that it is John of Rila; however, a commons user thinks that the image is of God the Father.  I was wondering if you could help me figure this out.  Click [[Commons:Image_talk:Saint_John_of_Rila_%28Ivan_Rilski%29.jpg|here]] for the image talk discussion.  I was under the impression that the Iconoclastic controversy determined that God the Father could not be represented on an icon.  If you have some insights, I would really appreciate it.  Thanks, [[User:Psy guy|Psy guy]] <sup>[[User_talk:Psy_guy|Talk]]</sup> 05:20, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
538717 +++$+++ Psy_guy +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538716 +++$+++ 538716 +++$+++ 2006-02-25 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.140873720E09 +++$+++ By the way, thanks for nominating my pic from the Shipka Pass for Featured Picture.  I am flattered that it was so popular.   +++$+++ :By the way, thanks for nominating my pic from the Shipka Pass for Featured Picture.  I am flattered that it was so popular.  [[User:Psy guy|Psy guy]] <sup>[[User_talk:Psy_guy|Talk]]</sup> 05:22, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

14430 +++$+++ Goldblooded +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310353500E09 +++$+++ Well he always his sticking his nose in things and interfering with other peoples business, as i have learnt. Just revert the edit its their talkpage the owner should do whatever they want with it.  +++$+++ Well he always his sticking his nose in things and interfering with other peoples business, as i have learnt. Just revert the edit its their talkpage the owner should do whatever they want with it. [[User:Goldblooded|Goldblooded]] ([[User talk:Goldblooded|talk]]) 20:05, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
14431 +++$+++ σ +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14430 +++$+++ 14430 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.310366880E09 +++$+++ Um... [[WP:CIVIL|is there a more civilised way to say that]]? --<span style=\"text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ :Um... [[WP:CIVIL|is there a more civilised way to say that]]? --<span style="text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Σ|The Σ]] <sup>[[User talk:Σ|talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-3.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Σ|contribs]]</sub></span> 23:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
14432 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14430 +++$+++ 14431 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.310396280E09 +++$+++ Long story short, Chzz and I were both at the Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit. He borrowed my computer, forgot I was the one logged in, and reverted something on his user page. Don't worry, I already yelled at him for it. ;-)  +++$+++ ::Long story short, Chzz and I were both at the Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit. He borrowed my computer, forgot I was the one logged in, and reverted something on his user page. Don't worry, I already yelled at him for it. ;-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 07:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14433 +++$+++ Sonia +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14430 +++$+++ 14432 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.310424480E09 +++$+++ OMAI sockpuppeting.  +++$+++ :::OMAI sockpuppeting. [[User talk:Sonia|<font color="#CC0099">sonia</font><font color="black">♫</font>]] 15:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14434 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14430 +++$+++ 14433 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.310424600E09 +++$+++ I couldn't do anything about it, the revert had already gone through before I knew what was happening! I should sue... ;-) <small>I will personally slap anyone who mentions NLT<\/small>  +++$+++ ::::I couldn't do anything about it, the revert had already gone through before I knew what was happening! I should sue... ;-) <small>I will personally slap anyone who mentions NLT</small> [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 15:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14435 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14430 +++$+++ 14434 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310435700E09 +++$+++ Honestly, I sat at a table with the two of them, Ed and Chzz, and I couldn't tell one from the other, except that Ed was wearing a hoodie.  +++$+++ :::::Honestly, I sat at a table with the two of them, Ed and Chzz, and I couldn't tell one from the other, except that Ed was wearing a hoodie. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14436 +++$+++ GorillaWarfare +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14430 +++$+++ 14435 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.310438100E09 +++$+++ FWIW, I already offered to block the both of them for sockpuppetry :D <span style=\"font-family: Georgia\">\u2013  +++$+++ ::::::FWIW, I already offered to block the both of them for sockpuppetry :D <span style="font-family: Georgia">– [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] <small>[[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]]</small></span> 19:35, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14437 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14430 +++$+++ 14436 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.310441160E09 +++$+++ Gorilla, since I saw you without the King Kong suit on you have lost all authority with me. I still love you for your charm, of course.  +++$+++ :::::::Gorilla, since I saw you without the King Kong suit on you have lost all authority with me. I still love you for your charm, of course. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

526693 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526693 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.176889500E09 +++$+++ Never heard of him before, until now.  +++$+++ Never heard of him before, until now. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
526694 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526693 +++$+++ 526693 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.176889860E09 +++$+++ Will do, after I get back.  I think that one of my contacts in Texas can help.  +++$+++ *Will do, after I get back.  I think that one of my contacts in Texas can help. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 02:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

538722 +++$+++ Smartech +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-04 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.141526640E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0439! \u0421\u043d\u0438\u043c\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u044f\u0442\u043e \u0442\u0438 \u0441\u0438 \u0438\u0437\u0433\u043e\u0442\u0432\u0438\u043b \u043d\u0430 \u0421\u0430\u043d \u0421\u0442\u0435\u0444\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f \u0431\u0435\u0448\u0435 \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u0432 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0437\u0430 [[:mk: \u0411\u0443\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0458\u0430|\u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f]] \u043d\u0430 \u043c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0443\u0438\u043a\u0438\u043f\u0435\u0434\u0438\u044f. \u041e\u0431\u0430\u0447\u0435 \u0434\u0443\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0430 \"\u043e\u0441\u0432\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0430\" \u043d\u0435 \u0441\u0435 \u0445\u0430\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u043d\u044f\u043a\u043e\u0438 \u0442\u0430\u043c\u043e\u0448\u043d\u0438 \u043b\u044e\u0434\u0435 \u0438 \u044f \u043f\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0430\u0445\u043d\u0430\u0445. \u041d\u0430\u0434\u044f\u0432\u0430\u043c \u0441\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0430\u0448 \u043d\u0435\u0449\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0442\u0438\u0432. \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438!  +++$+++ Здравей! Снимката която ти си изготвил на Сан Стефанска България беше сложена в статията за [[:mk: Бугарија|България]] на македонската уикипедия. Обаче думата "освободена" не се хареса на някои тамошни люде и я премахнах. Надявам се да намаш нещо против. Поздрави! [[User:Smartech|Smartech]] 18:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
538723 +++$+++ Vergina +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538722 +++$+++ 538722 +++$+++ 2006-03-05 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.141575420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Vergina|Vergina]] 08:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

538725 +++$+++  +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538725 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-12 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.142200800E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on [[Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags]] or [[User talk:Carnildo/images]]. 14:00, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
538726 +++$+++ 82.120.139.18 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538725 +++$+++ 538725 +++$+++ 2006-03-13 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.142322480E09 +++$+++ Hello, this image you have uploaded is listed for deletion. Partially my fault, I modified the title and a guy found the image by making survey on my user, seems he got interested to look at all my edits and uploads... :(  +++$+++ *Hello, this image you have uploaded is listed for deletion. Partially my fault, I modified the title and a guy found the image by making survey on my user, seems he got interested to look at all my edits and uploads... :( [[User:82.120.139.18|82.120.139.18]] 23:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

14438 +++$+++ GorillaWarfare +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.310443020E09 +++$+++ {{outdent}} Hm, now that people have discovered I'm not 400 pounds and unusually hairy, I seem to have lost my street cred :D Perhaps I should become meaner... Great image, by the way. I may have to use that in the future. <span style=\"font-family: Georgia\">\u2013  +++$+++ {{outdent}} Hm, now that people have discovered I'm not 400 pounds and unusually hairy, I seem to have lost my street cred :D Perhaps I should become meaner... Great image, by the way. I may have to use that in the future. <span style="font-family: Georgia">– [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] <small>[[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]]</small></span> 20:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14439 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14438 +++$+++ 14438 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310459340E09 +++$+++ Drmies, stop lying. He had a few more wrinkles and a much heavier accent. Gorilla, I still find it hard to believe you aren't a 40-year old, 300-pound man with pizza stains on his stomach and a sticky keyboard. ;-)  +++$+++ :Drmies, stop lying. He had a few more wrinkles and a much heavier accent. Gorilla, I still find it hard to believe you aren't a 40-year old, 300-pound man with pizza stains on his stomach and a sticky keyboard. ;-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 01:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14440 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14438 +++$+++ 14439 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310460420E09 +++$+++ Like! Besides, now that we have discovered her wit and charm, we will never be able to view her as a gorilla again. I guess she should rename herself to \"CharmfulWarfare\" or something of the like.  +++$+++ ::Like! Besides, now that we have discovered her wit and charm, we will never be able to view her as a gorilla again. I guess she should rename herself to "CharmfulWarfare" or something of the like. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 01:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14441 +++$+++ GorillaWarfare +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14438 +++$+++ 14440 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310464560E09 +++$+++ \"Charmful\"? I believe the word is \"charming\", my dear... As for the rest of it, maybe I am a 40-year-old, 300-pound man cleverly disguised as a young girl... <span style=\"font-family: Georgia\">\u2013  +++$+++ :::"Charmful"? I believe the word is "charming", my dear... As for the rest of it, maybe I am a 40-year-old, 300-pound man cleverly disguised as a young girl... <span style="font-family: Georgia">– [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] <small>[[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]]</small></span> 02:56, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14442 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14438 +++$+++ 14441 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310478540E09 +++$+++ Why are we dividing the line between male\/female her? Obviously she's transgender. Duh.  +++$+++ ::::Why are we dividing the line between male/female her? Obviously she's transgender. Duh. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14443 +++$+++ GorillaWarfare +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14438 +++$+++ 14442 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.310526540E09 +++$+++ If I'm transgender, then I guess we'll need 89.5 guys and 9.5 girls around to complete the demographic. This complicates matters... <span style=\"font-family: Georgia\">\u2013  +++$+++ :::::If I'm transgender, then I guess we'll need 89.5 guys and 9.5 girls around to complete the demographic. This complicates matters... <span style="font-family: Georgia">– [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] <small>[[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]]</small></span> 20:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14444 +++$+++ Sonia +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14438 +++$+++ 14443 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.310530200E09 +++$+++ Given my height, I probably count as the .5 of a girl.  +++$+++ ::::::Given my height, I probably count as the .5 of a girl. [[User talk:Sonia|<font color="#CC0099">sonia</font><font color="black">♫</font>]] 21:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14445 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14438 +++$+++ 14444 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.310565420E09 +++$+++ Or we recruit another transgender individual to balance the demographic? Or was that too simple of a solution? ;)  +++$+++ :::::::Or we recruit another transgender individual to balance the demographic? Or was that too simple of a solution? ;) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

538727 +++$+++ Bomac +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-14 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.142380680E09 +++$+++ \u0415\u0458 \u0422\u043e\u0434\u043e\u0440, \u0444\u0430\u043b\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043d\u0435\u0443\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043b\u043d\u0438\u043e\u0442 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043f \u043d\u0430 [[Macedonian language|\u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u0458\u0430\u0437\u0438\u043a]]! \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432,  +++$+++ Еј Тодор, фала за понеутралниот пристап на [[Macedonian language|Македонски јазик]]! Поздрав, [[User:Bomac|Bomac]] 15:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
538728 +++$+++ Bomac +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538727 +++$+++ 538727 +++$+++ 2006-03-14 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.142381940E09 +++$+++ \u0414\u0430, \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0440\u043e \u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u0441\u043f\u043e\u043c\u043d\u0435 \u0438 \u0415\u0442\u043d\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433, \u0431\u0438\u0434\u0435\u0458\u045c\u0438 \u0441\u0435\u043f\u0430\u043a \u0442\u043e\u0458 \u0435 \u0435\u0434\u0435\u043d \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0438\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d \u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u0440. \u0410 \u0437\u0430 \u0411\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430, \u043d\u0435 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u043c, \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0431\u0438 \u0433\u0438 \u0432\u0431\u0440\u043e\u0458\u0443\u0432\u0430\u0430\u0442 \u0438 \u043c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0410\u043b\u0431\u0430\u043d\u0446\u0438, \u043d\u043e \u0432\u0435\u0440\u043e\u0458\u0430\u0442\u043d\u043e \u0433\u043e \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0435\u0448 \u0438 \u0422\u0438 \u043c\u043e\u0435\u0442\u043e \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0435\u045a\u0435. \u0421\u0435\u043f\u0430\u043a, \u043d\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043d\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u0440\u0430\u0458 \u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0443\u0432\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u043e\u0442. \u0417\u0430 \u0413\u0440\u0446\u0438\u0442\u0435, no comment.  +++$+++ :Да, добро е да се спомне и Етнолог, бидејќи сепак тој е еден достоинствен извор. А за Британика, не знам, можеби ги вбројуваат и македонските Албанци, но веројатно го знаеш и Ти моето мислење. Сепак, навистина на крај останува на читателот. За Грците, no comment. [[User:Bomac|Bomac]] 16:19, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

276584 +++$+++ 1028 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276584 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-01 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.146467040E09 +++$+++ Ads you can see, having a poll of the day is a good idea +++$+++ Ads you can see, having a poll of the day is a good idea[[User:1028|1028]] 00:04, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
276585 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276584 +++$+++ 276584 +++$+++ 2006-05-01 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.146478380E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm not sure that (1) is necessary -- are there too few people \"involved\" right now? What effects of that are showable? For (2) I suppose that's possible, though unproven (people would register to ''delete'' an article, when they don't register now to ''edit'' them?). (3) is just a restatement of the process, not an argument, and doesn't explain how it differs from the existenting AfD system, and (4) is certainly one way of looking at it, but many things vie for Main Page attention that arguably \"should\" have them. I've suggested in the past that a Science Item of the Day would be cool, but didn't get many others interested. So, I suggest you go to [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion]] and argue there for replacing the AfD process (which was just recently revised) with a wide-ranging poll. -- +++$+++ :Well, I'm not sure that (1) is necessary -- are there too few people "involved" right now? What effects of that are showable? For (2) I suppose that's possible, though unproven (people would register to ''delete'' an article, when they don't register now to ''edit'' them?). (3) is just a restatement of the process, not an argument, and doesn't explain how it differs from the existenting AfD system, and (4) is certainly one way of looking at it, but many things vie for Main Page attention that arguably "should" have them. I've suggested in the past that a Science Item of the Day would be cool, but didn't get many others interested. So, I suggest you go to [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion]] and argue there for replacing the AfD process (which was just recently revised) with a wide-ranging poll. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 03:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

538729 +++$+++ Latinus +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538729 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-14 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.142383260E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438! \u0410\u0437 \u0446\u0435\u043d\u044f \u0432\u0438\u0441\u043e\u043a\u043e \u0442\u0432\u043e\u044f\u0442 \u043e\u043f\u0438\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u0434\u043e\u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u0430\u0441\u044f\u0448 \u0437\u0430 \u0441\u043f\u043e\u0433\u0430\u0436\u0434\u0430\u043c\u0435 \u043d\u0430 [[Macedonian language]], \u043d\u043e \u0430\u0437 \u043d\u0435 \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0435 \u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430 \u0438\u0434\u0435\u044f \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0443\u0441\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0435 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043e \u0421\u043b\u0430\u0432\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438. \u0410\u0437 \u043a\u0430\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043c \u0437\u0430\u0449\u043e \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u0431\u0435\u0441\u0435\u0434\u0430. \u0421\u044a\u0447\u0443\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u0432\u0430\u043c \u043d\u0430 \u0433\u0440\u0435\u0448\u043a\u0438\u0442\u0435 :-\/ -- +++$+++ Здрасти! Аз ценя високо твоят опит за допринасяш за спогаждаме на [[Macedonian language]], но аз не мисля че е добра идея да пропускаме името Славомакедонски. Аз казвам защо на страница за беседа. Съчувствувам на грешките :-/ --[[User:Latinus|Latinus]] 16:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
538730 +++$+++ Latinus +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538729 +++$+++ 538729 +++$+++ 2006-03-14 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.142386500E09 +++$+++ \u0415 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0435 \u0447\u0435 \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0438\u0448 \u0447\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0435\u043c\u043b\u0438\u0432\u043e. \u0422\u0435 \u043d\u0435 \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u044f\u0442 :-\/ \u0412\u0438\u0436\u0434\u0430\u043c \u0447\u0435 \u0432\u043e\u0439\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u044a\u043b\u0436\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0442. \u041d\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0433\u0430\u043c\u0435 \u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435. -- +++$+++ :Е добре че мислиш че да е приемливо. Те не мислят :-/ Виждам че войната на версите продължават. Надежда постигаме споразумение. --[[User:Latinus|Latinus]] 17:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

276586 +++$+++ 1028 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276586 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-03 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.146722580E09 +++$+++ I agree that there should be a Science Item too.  +++$+++ I agree that there should be a Science Item too. [[User:1028|1028]] 23:03, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
276587 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276586 +++$+++ 276586 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.146724500E09 +++$+++ I have actually altered my opinion since last year -- now I think it would be better to have a featured ''portal'' every day or week. See [[Portal:Science]] for your featured science needs. -- +++$+++ :I have actually altered my opinion since last year -- now I think it would be better to have a featured ''portal'' every day or week. See [[Portal:Science]] for your featured science needs. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 23:35, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

276588 +++$+++ KI +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276588 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-14 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.147592100E09 +++$+++ How are the deaths of 200 people and the destruction of a major pipeline unencyclopedic? The Nigerian government has launched a special investigation.  +++$+++ How are the deaths of 200 people and the destruction of a major pipeline unencyclopedic? The Nigerian government has launched a special investigation. [[User:KI|KI]] 00:35, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
276589 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276588 +++$+++ 276588 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.147595040E09 +++$+++ If you believe so, then by all means, flesh it out into a proper article. Last time I checked it was still barely two sentences. -- +++$+++ :If you believe so, then by all means, flesh it out into a proper article. Last time I checked it was still barely two sentences. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 01:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

538733 +++$+++ Miljoshi +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-20 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.142881320E09 +++$+++ Hi, saw your request for the this map. I should be able to help with the svg etc., if you could provide me the English names. Cheers! --<FONT style=\"color:#5A3696\"> +++$+++ Hi, saw your request for the this map. I should be able to help with the svg etc., if you could provide me the English names. Cheers! --<FONT style="color:#5A3696">[[User:Miljoshi|ΜιĿ]]</FONT>ː<FONT style="color:#008000">[[User talk:Miljoshi|talk]]</FONT> 11:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
538734 +++$+++ Miljoshi +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538733 +++$+++ 538733 +++$+++ 2006-03-20 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.142892120E09 +++$+++ Hello Todor, here is the English version of the map: [[:Image:Metro Sofia en.svg]], with some finer corrections as well. Hope it looks okay. Cheers! --<FONT style=\"color:#5A3696\"> +++$+++ :Hello Todor, here is the English version of the map: [[:Image:Metro Sofia en.svg]], with some finer corrections as well. Hope it looks okay. Cheers! --<FONT style="color:#5A3696">[[User:Miljoshi|ΜιĿ]]</FONT>ː<FONT style="color:#008000">[[User talk:Miljoshi|talk]]</FONT> 14:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

14446 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310516280E09 +++$+++ After a long, complicated series of cocktails in [[Cheers]], there is little chance of a coherent reply from me. So, here's a picture instead. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ After a long, complicated series of cocktails in [[Cheers]], there is little chance of a coherent reply from me. So, here's a picture instead. <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 17:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14447 +++$+++ GorillaWarfare +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14446 +++$+++ 14446 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.310526540E09 +++$+++ So, verdict? Is it as good as the bar from the show? <span style=\"font-family: Georgia\">\u2013  +++$+++ :So, verdict? Is it as good as the bar from the show? <span style="font-family: Georgia">– [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] <small>[[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]]</small></span> 20:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14448 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14446 +++$+++ 14447 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.310565420E09 +++$+++ Chzz, you were that inebriated by 1pm?!  +++$+++ ::Chzz, you were that inebriated by 1pm?! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
14449 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14446 +++$+++ 14448 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310644500E09 +++$+++ It was a long night... <small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ :::It was a long night... <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 04:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
14450 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14446 +++$+++ 14449 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310649480E09 +++$+++ Understandable then.  +++$+++ ::::Understandable then. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:18, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
14451 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14446 +++$+++ 14450 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.310718120E09 +++$+++ So you did go to it! Did you go to the original bar or imitation? Next yeara, excluding the gorilla, we should all go barhopping during Wikimania.  +++$+++ :::::So you did go to it! Did you go to the original bar or imitation? Next yeara, excluding the gorilla, we should all go barhopping during Wikimania. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 01:22, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

276592 +++$+++ Golbez +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-20 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.148166660E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see. I only noticed that when removing a large mention of GHW from GWB's (I love these acronyms) intro, and I figured, being a grandfather of GHWB... but yeah, if you're making an article for the Walkers specifically, then okay. :) -- +++$+++ Ah, I see. I only noticed that when removing a large mention of GHW from GWB's (I love these acronyms) intro, and I figured, being a grandfather of GHWB... but yeah, if you're making an article for the Walkers specifically, then okay. :) --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 16:11, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
276593 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276592 +++$+++ 276592 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.148376300E09 +++$+++ I'm astonished that you're actually admitting to a violation of the guidelines. If you have been editing Wikipedia as long as you claim, then you should understand why it's a bad idea to just let people link their own material right and left (that's a libertarianism joke, son). Should we add all 500,000 Technorati references to the Kills in that article, because they're \"valid\" opinions? What would Wikipedia become? -- +++$+++ :I'm astonished that you're actually admitting to a violation of the guidelines. If you have been editing Wikipedia as long as you claim, then you should understand why it's a bad idea to just let people link their own material right and left (that's a libertarianism joke, son). Should we add all 500,000 Technorati references to the Kills in that article, because they're "valid" opinions? What would Wikipedia become? --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 02:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

14452 +++$+++ Chlopeck +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.310352000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Chlopeck|Chlopeck]] ([[User talk:Chlopeck|talk]]) 19:40, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
14453 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14452 +++$+++ 14452 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.310396340E09 +++$+++ {{like}} Thanks very much! Let me know if you need any help in getting your article to FA!  +++$+++ :{{like}} Thanks very much! Let me know if you need any help in getting your article to FA! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 07:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

538741 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-12 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.144895340E09 +++$+++ What exactly needs to be done and organized?  +++$+++ What exactly needs to be done and organized? [[User:FunkyFly|FunkyFly]] 19:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
538742 +++$+++ Trunchanin +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538741 +++$+++ 538741 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.145150460E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I saw your message and the discusion about the project on other contributors' pages. I'm reluctant to sign up under it. For one I use wiki mainly as a source, not so much as a place to write for others. The reason is that I lack the understanding on issues that interest me, in contrast to users like VMORO for example, and I may do more harm than good, if I get involved. I will follow the development of the project though, and I will try to contribute towards its goals. Not very actively though, as I'm not really here that often. Best regards---  +++$+++ *Hi there. I saw your message and the discusion about the project on other contributors' pages. I'm reluctant to sign up under it. For one I use wiki mainly as a source, not so much as a place to write for others. The reason is that I lack the understanding on issues that interest me, in contrast to users like VMORO for example, and I may do more harm than good, if I get involved. I will follow the development of the project though, and I will try to contribute towards its goals. Not very actively though, as I'm not really here that often. Best regards--- [[User:Trunchanin|Trunchanin]] 18:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

14454 +++$+++ Cullen328 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.310420460E09 +++$+++ Ed, it was a pleasure meeting you in Boston, and good work ignoring all rules regarding [[Quran miracle]].  I look forward to collaborating with you on the rapid expansion of Wikipedia in Higher Education.   +++$+++ Ed, it was a pleasure meeting you in Boston, and good work ignoring all rules regarding [[Quran miracle]].  I look forward to collaborating with you on the rapid expansion of Wikipedia in Higher Education.  [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 14:41, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14455 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14454 +++$+++ 14454 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.310423760E09 +++$+++ Likewise. I feel like Quran miracle will be the first thing we talk about if we meet again in the future. ;-) Hope to see you at Wikimania 2012!  +++$+++ :Likewise. I feel like Quran miracle will be the first thing we talk about if we meet again in the future. ;-) Hope to see you at Wikimania 2012! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 15:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14456 +++$+++ Cullen328 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14454 +++$+++ 14455 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.310435100E09 +++$+++ They tried again with [[Quran numeric miracle]] but that didn't last long.  It seems that sockpuppets and or meatpuppets who believe in this miracle are now being born.  Getting on a plane for home in a few minutes.  +++$+++ ::They tried again with [[Quran numeric miracle]] but that didn't last long.  It seems that sockpuppets and or meatpuppets who believe in this miracle are now being born.  Getting on a plane for home in a few minutes. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 18:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14457 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14454 +++$+++ 14456 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.310435400E09 +++$+++ Oh, they tried again? I'm sorry I missed the party. Happy trails, Cullen, and please give my regards to Mrs. Cullen--do tell her I respect her for sticking it out with you and even accompanying you to that geek conference! ;)  +++$+++ :::Oh, they tried again? I'm sorry I missed the party. Happy trails, Cullen, and please give my regards to Mrs. Cullen--do tell her I respect her for sticking it out with you and even accompanying you to that geek conference! ;) [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14458 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14454 +++$+++ 14456 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.310435580E09 +++$+++ I'm sure you all saw this, [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations\/Quran Information]]. I was about to go ahead and start blocking when I saw that an SPI had been opened--an open and shut case, of course.  +++$+++ :::I'm sure you all saw this, [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Quran Information]]. I was about to go ahead and start blocking when I saw that an SPI had been opened--an open and shut case, of course. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:53, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14459 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14454 +++$+++ 14458 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310459340E09 +++$+++ It's like playing whack-a-mole...! Hope you had a safe trip, Cullen.  +++$+++ ::::It's like playing whack-a-mole...! Hope you had a safe trip, Cullen. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 01:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14460 +++$+++ Cullen328 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14454 +++$+++ 14459 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310507220E09 +++$+++ We arrived home OK, Ed, but the flight had terrifying moments, which I discussed on Drmies talk page.  +++$+++ :::::We arrived home OK, Ed, but the flight had terrifying moments, which I discussed on Drmies talk page. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 14:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14461 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14454 +++$+++ 14460 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.310565420E09 +++$+++ I read about it &ndash; I'm very glad you made it home safe.  +++$+++ ::::::I read about it &ndash; I'm very glad you made it home safe. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

611514 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611514 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-16 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.308278580E09 +++$+++ I have started a [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States History|discussion]] and will contact each of the active members for their comments and input on the suggestion. Please take a moment and add your comments to the discussion or feel free to contact me if you have any questions. -- +++$+++ I have started a [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States History|discussion]] and will contact each of the active members for their comments and input on the suggestion. Please take a moment and add your comments to the discussion or feel free to contact me if you have any questions. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 19:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
611515 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611514 +++$+++ 611514 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308781320E09 +++$+++ Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives\u2014which houses some of America's most important historical documents\u2014is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/NARA\/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]].  +++$+++ :Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]]. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

276601 +++$+++ ThePromenader +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 07:41:00 +++$+++ 1.153320060E09 +++$+++ Regards --  +++$+++ Regards -- [[User:ThePromenader|<span style="font-family: Times; font-size:12px;"><span style="font-size:16px;">T</span>HE<span style="font-size:16px;">P</span>ROMENADER</span>]] 07:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
276602 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276601 +++$+++ 276601 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.153320300E09 +++$+++ I understand your firmness on the policy issue, but RM operates by consensus voting, and it was clear that there was considerable pushback before the vote. If the other editors were undecided that would have been a different story. Thus, you're effectively wasting people's time. -- +++$+++ :I understand your firmness on the policy issue, but RM operates by consensus voting, and it was clear that there was considerable pushback before the vote. If the other editors were undecided that would have been a different story. Thus, you're effectively wasting people's time. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 07:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
276603 +++$+++ ThePromenader +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276601 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.153321260E09 +++$+++ You mean to say that it is possible to publish something that's not true just because several agree to? I don't stand a chance then. Anyhow, thanks for your reply.  +++$+++ ::: You mean to say that it is possible to publish something that's not true just because several agree to? I don't stand a chance then. Anyhow, thanks for your reply. [[User:ThePromenader|<span style="font-family: Times; font-size:12px;"><span style="font-size:16px;">T</span>HE<span style="font-size:16px;">P</span>ROMENADER</span>]] 08:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
276604 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276601 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 08:02:00 +++$+++ 1.153321320E09 +++$+++ See [[WP:POINT]]. -- +++$+++ :::: See [[WP:POINT]]. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 08:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

538747 +++$+++ Rossami +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-18 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.145421420E09 +++$+++ You recently made a few edits to the Deletion review page.  I'm not sure how much experience you've had yet with the kinds of decisions which are addressed on that page.  You should know that votes with no comments or rationale to back them up are routinely ignored when the final decision is made.  We welcome experienced editors with facts or evidence to contribute to the discussions but it can't be emphasized enough that we are ''discussing'' the issue, not [[WP:VIE|voting]].   +++$+++ You recently made a few edits to the Deletion review page.  I'm not sure how much experience you've had yet with the kinds of decisions which are addressed on that page.  You should know that votes with no comments or rationale to back them up are routinely ignored when the final decision is made.  We welcome experienced editors with facts or evidence to contribute to the discussions but it can't be emphasized enough that we are ''discussing'' the issue, not [[WP:VIE|voting]].  [[User:Rossami|Rossami]] <small>[[User talk:Rossami|(talk)]]</small> 21:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
538748 +++$+++ Aaron Brenneman +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538747 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-19 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.145440860E09 +++$+++ Hello!  I came here to say exactly that.  I say this as a very-frequent closer of DRv and AfD debates:To have your voice heard, you have to ''use'' it a little bit more. -  +++$+++ ::Hello!  I came here to say exactly that.  I say this as a very-frequent closer of DRv and AfD debates:To have your voice heard, you have to ''use'' it a little bit more. - [[User:Aaron Brenneman|<font color="#000000">brenneman</font>]]<span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Aaron+Brenneman<font color="000000" title="Admin actions"><sup>'''{L}''' </sup></font>]</span> 03:01, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
538749 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538747 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.145555880E09 +++$+++ All right, I'm sorry to have taken part. By voting ''undelete'' I implied I agree with the ''undelete'' votes cast until that moment, but I admit I shouldn't have taken this for implicit. It's important to note that while looking through Deletion review, I saw many plain votes without any or much explanation. I also did not find any explicit specification that I have to explain my decision (in most the cases, just to write ''as above'' or a senseless single line telling what was already said, but in another way, like most people do), so I don't really understand that routine ignoration of votes, more precisely the way it's carried out. Yes, I know sockpuppets are an important issue, but this simply is not the way, I believe, guys. That said, I won't be taking part in any further Deletion review ''discussions'', if my actions arouse this much discontent really. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]]  +++$+++ ::: All right, I'm sorry to have taken part. By voting ''undelete'' I implied I agree with the ''undelete'' votes cast until that moment, but I admit I shouldn't have taken this for implicit. It's important to note that while looking through Deletion review, I saw many plain votes without any or much explanation. I also did not find any explicit specification that I have to explain my decision (in most the cases, just to write ''as above'' or a senseless single line telling what was already said, but in another way, like most people do), so I don't really understand that routine ignoration of votes, more precisely the way it's carried out. Yes, I know sockpuppets are an important issue, but this simply is not the way, I believe, guys. That said, I won't be taking part in any further Deletion review ''discussions'', if my actions arouse this much discontent really. [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]] [[User:TodorBozhinov|→ Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov]] [[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]] 10:58, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

576598 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576598 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-13 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.215955920E09 +++$+++ This is my final request for you to stop commenting on my administrative actions in any way unless you are directly involved. I have repeatedly asked you to provide evidence when you have concerns about my actions, and you continue to fail to provide that. You instead repeatedly show up and poison the well with your unfounded accusations of bias. Because you have been repeatedly asked to stop and have repeatedly failed to do so I consider this harrasment and am asking you one last time to stop or I will take this further down the DR chain. Thankyou.  +++$+++ This is my final request for you to stop commenting on my administrative actions in any way unless you are directly involved. I have repeatedly asked you to provide evidence when you have concerns about my actions, and you continue to fail to provide that. You instead repeatedly show up and poison the well with your unfounded accusations of bias. Because you have been repeatedly asked to stop and have repeatedly failed to do so I consider this harrasment and am asking you one last time to stop or I will take this further down the DR chain. Thankyou. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 06:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
576599 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576598 +++$+++ 576598 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.215984840E09 +++$+++ If you post for review of your admin actions, I WILL review them. I have posted plenty of evidence, as has Felonious Monk and others, about your misuse of tools and position as an administrator at the arbcom case you are named in, so writing me saying I provide no evidence is erroneous. Your two recent blocks were overturned...the comunity did not agree with your rationale and or length of the blocks...and I do read WR..there, a user named Aloft posted a link to the article [[Brown Dog affair]], claiming that Crum375 and SlimVirgin were tag team edit warring...you subsequently protected the article page, then blocked Para and Crum375. You then posted these admin actions for review here and went back to WR and posted a link to your review request on ANI stating to \"prepare for fireworks\"[http:\/\/wikipediareview.com\/index.php?showtopic=18890&st=60]...so you even then suspected that your actions would likely bring arguments. I guess you must think I can't read blogs or look at editing diffs...your blocks weren't based on any reports here at AIV or 3RR...they were based on the long standing theme at WR that Slim and Crum are socks or meatpuppets....and the chance to \"get\" either simply proved irresistible eh?-- +++$+++ :If you post for review of your admin actions, I WILL review them. I have posted plenty of evidence, as has Felonious Monk and others, about your misuse of tools and position as an administrator at the arbcom case you are named in, so writing me saying I provide no evidence is erroneous. Your two recent blocks were overturned...the comunity did not agree with your rationale and or length of the blocks...and I do read WR..there, a user named Aloft posted a link to the article [[Brown Dog affair]], claiming that Crum375 and SlimVirgin were tag team edit warring...you subsequently protected the article page, then blocked Para and Crum375. You then posted these admin actions for review here and went back to WR and posted a link to your review request on ANI stating to "prepare for fireworks"[http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=18890&st=60]...so you even then suspected that your actions would likely bring arguments. I guess you must think I can't read blogs or look at editing diffs...your blocks weren't based on any reports here at AIV or 3RR...they were based on the long standing theme at WR that Slim and Crum are socks or meatpuppets....and the chance to "get" either simply proved irresistible eh?--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 14:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
576600 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576598 +++$+++ 576598 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.215988260E09 +++$+++ Viridae...I think if we are going to go do anything about each other, you should wait and see what transpires at the case you are already named in first. If they do nothing, then we can discuss this matter further.-- +++$+++ :Viridae...I think if we are going to go do anything about each other, you should wait and see what transpires at the case you are already named in first. If they do nothing, then we can discuss this matter further.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 15:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
576601 +++$+++ DHeyward +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576598 +++$+++ 576598 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.216023780E09 +++$+++ I believe your answer to my identical request of you was....\"no.\".  I suspect MONGO is now on \"double secret probation\" for pointing out all of your abusive administrator actions?  -- +++$+++ :I believe your answer to my identical request of you was...."no.".  I suspect MONGO is now on "double secret probation" for pointing out all of your abusive administrator actions?  --[[User:DHeyward|DHeyward]] ([[User talk:DHeyward|talk]]) 01:23, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
576602 +++$+++ Rogerd +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576598 +++$+++ 576601 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.216033260E09 +++$+++ You \"suspect\"??  WP is [[WP:CRYSTAL|not a crystal ball]].  -- +++$+++ ::You "suspect"??  WP is [[WP:CRYSTAL|not a crystal ball]].  --[[User:Rogerd|rogerd]] ([[User talk:Rogerd|talk]]) 04:01, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
576603 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576598 +++$+++ 576602 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.216033860E09 +++$+++ .....[http:\/\/www.killerclips.com\/clip.php?id=123&qid=1549]-- +++$+++ :::.....[http://www.killerclips.com/clip.php?id=123&qid=1549]--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 04:11, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
576604 +++$+++ Rogerd +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576598 +++$+++ 576603 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.216038600E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.killerclips.com\/clip.php?id=123&qid=1555]  MONGO, I think our friend thinks he is Dean Wormer. -- +++$+++ ::::[http://www.killerclips.com/clip.php?id=123&qid=1555]  MONGO, I think our friend thinks he is Dean Wormer. --[[User:Rogerd|rogerd]] ([[User talk:Rogerd|talk]]) 05:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

14462 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.310432760E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Paul_Verlaine&diff=prev&oldid=438945803 Voila].  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Verlaine&diff=prev&oldid=438945803 Voila]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14463 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14462 +++$+++ 14462 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310459340E09 +++$+++ I think I have a source on that somewhere... Ryan's ''[[The Longest Day]]'', perhaps? Nice additions though, that's a very interesting topic. :-)  +++$+++ :I think I have a source on that somewhere... Ryan's ''[[The Longest Day]]'', perhaps? Nice additions though, that's a very interesting topic. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 01:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14464 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14462 +++$+++ 14463 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310461680E09 +++$+++ Yes it is. I thought it today. Did you listen to the poem? Like it's straight out of the movie (which, in the motherland, is on TV every year, early June--you can guess why). If you go through my edits, you'll see at least a few references to that flick. Hint: it has to do with categories. That should narrow it down.  +++$+++ ::Yes it is. I thought it today. Did you listen to the poem? Like it's straight out of the movie (which, in the motherland, is on TV every year, early June--you can guess why). If you go through my edits, you'll see at least a few references to that flick. Hint: it has to do with categories. That should narrow it down. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 02:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14465 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14462 +++$+++ 14464 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310478540E09 +++$+++ I read it, but I can't find it online. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that there is an easily-viewable video somewhere that I completely missed, though. Re references in cats, if that's what entertains you, keep up the cleverness. ;-)  +++$+++ :::I read it, but I can't find it online. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that there is an easily-viewable video somewhere that I completely missed, though. Re references in cats, if that's what entertains you, keep up the cleverness. ;-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14466 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14462 +++$+++ 14465 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310512800E09 +++$+++ Whenever I added categories, I used to type \"Pluskat\" in my edit summary.  +++$+++ ::::Whenever I added categories, I used to type "Pluskat" in my edit summary. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14467 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14462 +++$+++ 14466 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.310565420E09 +++$+++ You know you're a geek when...  +++$+++ :::::You know you're a geek when... [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

113959 +++$+++ Blacklake +++$+++ Hammersfan +++$+++ 113959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-24 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.253812080E09 +++$+++ <div class=\"floatleft\" style=\"margin-bottom:0\">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]<\/div>An article that you have been involved in editing, [[Chechen Republic of Ichkeria national football team]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]].  If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/{{str trim|Chechen Republic of Ichkeria national football team}}]].  Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw -->   +++$+++ <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, [[Chechen Republic of Ichkeria national football team]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]].  If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/{{str trim|Chechen Republic of Ichkeria national football team}}]].  Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw -->  [[User:Blacklake|Blacklake]] ([[User talk:Blacklake|talk]]) 10:08, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
113960 +++$+++ Thryduulf +++$+++ Hammersfan +++$+++ 113959 +++$+++ 113959 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.253826540E09 +++$+++ If you think there is anything that the closing administrator needs to know, then make a note of it on the discussion page. If the page has been vandalised, then say so. If you doubt a contributors reasons for nominations then say so (but remember [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:NPI]]). I have no interest in the article and have no opinion about it, I was merely categorising the deletion disucssion so that people who are interested can find it.  +++$+++ *If you think there is anything that the closing administrator needs to know, then make a note of it on the discussion page. If the page has been vandalised, then say so. If you doubt a contributors reasons for nominations then say so (but remember [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:NPI]]). I have no interest in the article and have no opinion about it, I was merely categorising the deletion disucssion so that people who are interested can find it. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 14:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

14468 +++$+++ Cunard +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.310435520E09 +++$+++ You [[#Talk:September 11 attacks#Arthur Rubin reverts good faith edits|offered above]] to close RfCs. I have posted several RfCs at AN (see the first three sections). If you could close one or a few of the RfCs, I'd be grateful. Thanks,  +++$+++ You [[#Talk:September 11 attacks#Arthur Rubin reverts good faith edits|offered above]] to close RfCs. I have posted several RfCs at AN (see the first three sections). If you could close one or a few of the RfCs, I'd be grateful. Thanks, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 18:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
14469 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14468 +++$+++ 14468 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310478540E09 +++$+++ I definitely missed this message. I will take a look either tomorrow morning or night (aka before or after work).  +++$+++ :I definitely missed this message. I will take a look either tomorrow morning or night (aka before or after work). [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14470 +++$+++ Cunard +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14468 +++$+++ 14469 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 07:41:00 +++$+++ 1.310568060E09 +++$+++ It seems that you can't close most of the RfCs since you've either participated in them ([[Talk:Main Page\/Request for comment: minimum prep-time for blurbs]]), they've been recently closed ([[Wikipedia talk:Edit warring#RfC on proposed new 3RR exemption]]), or they are not ready for closure ([[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style\/dash drafting]]).<p>However, some of the proposals at [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)\/Account security]] remain open and can be closed, such as \"[[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)\/Account security#Require more complex passwords|#Require more complex passwords]]\" and \"[[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)\/Account security#Notify users via email when someone tries to log into their account with the wrong password|#Notify users via email when someone tries to log into their account with the wrong password]]\". Best,  +++$+++ ::It seems that you can't close most of the RfCs since you've either participated in them ([[Talk:Main Page/Request for comment: minimum prep-time for blurbs]]), they've been recently closed ([[Wikipedia talk:Edit warring#RfC on proposed new 3RR exemption]]), or they are not ready for closure ([[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/dash drafting]]).<p>However, some of the proposals at [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Account security]] remain open and can be closed, such as "[[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Account security#Require more complex passwords|#Require more complex passwords]]" and "[[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Account security#Notify users via email when someone tries to log into their account with the wrong password|#Notify users via email when someone tries to log into their account with the wrong password]]". Best, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 07:41, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
14471 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14468 +++$+++ 14470 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.310570460E09 +++$+++ Yup, that's what I found when I went through them. I took care of the two you linked, but how about the \"subjects of commentary\" RFC? There's consensus in the ''first'' section, but the other threads explore many other alternatives and don't really have a consensus. As such, I'd lean no consensus but I'd appreciate a second view on it from you. :-)  +++$+++ :::Yup, that's what I found when I went through them. I took care of the two you linked, but how about the "subjects of commentary" RFC? There's consensus in the ''first'' section, but the other threads explore many other alternatives and don't really have a consensus. As such, I'd lean no consensus but I'd appreciate a second view on it from you. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 08:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
14472 +++$+++ Cunard +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14468 +++$+++ 14471 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310605980E09 +++$+++ Thank you for closing the two from the account security proposals. My reading of the [[Wikipedia talk:Non-free content\/Archive 53#Must images of historical importance be \"subjects of commentary\" before we can claim fair use?|RfC]] (after a superficial skim) is that in the first section, most people are in agreement with SlimVirgin's proposal, while the rest of the RfC is general discussion and alternate proposals that have failed to achieve consensus.  +++$+++ ::::Thank you for closing the two from the account security proposals. My reading of the [[Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 53#Must images of historical importance be "subjects of commentary" before we can claim fair use?|RfC]] (after a superficial skim) is that in the first section, most people are in agreement with SlimVirgin's proposal, while the rest of the RfC is general discussion and alternate proposals that have failed to achieve consensus. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 18:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
14473 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14468 +++$+++ 14472 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.310607600E09 +++$+++ Hmm, okay, I'll think this over and close it tonight. Thanks Cunard!  +++$+++ :::::Hmm, okay, I'll think this over and close it tonight. Thanks Cunard! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 18:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
14474 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14468 +++$+++ 14473 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.310749260E09 +++$+++ After thinking about it and nearly forgetting, I decided your ideas were close to reality than my initial thoughts. There is a clear consensus to remove it in the first section, and the remainder of the discussions should be treated separately from that. Thanks for giving your input!  +++$+++ ::::::After thinking about it and nearly forgetting, I decided your ideas were close to reality than my initial thoughts. There is a clear consensus to remove it in the first section, and the remainder of the discussions should be treated separately from that. Thanks for giving your input! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 10:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

276615 +++$+++ Veratien +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276615 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-21 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.156148040E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Veratien|Veratien]] 01:14, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
276616 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276615 +++$+++ 276615 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.156151160E09 +++$+++ In general I find the longer editors are here the less they disagree on this (i.e. overlinking is increasingly deprecated). In concert with [[WP:CONTEXT]] I think that ''some'' important dates, perhaps the discovery as you say, might be linked, but I don't see the point of linking every single year -- your examples are more random searches than things that are relevant to the article. The hypertextness of Wikipedia is tempting but distracting, and lead to [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Overlinking|overlinking]] -- one example of which is \"low-added-value items\" such as years. -- +++$+++ :In general I find the longer editors are here the less they disagree on this (i.e. overlinking is increasingly deprecated). In concert with [[WP:CONTEXT]] I think that ''some'' important dates, perhaps the discovery as you say, might be linked, but I don't see the point of linking every single year -- your examples are more random searches than things that are relevant to the article. The hypertextness of Wikipedia is tempting but distracting, and lead to [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Overlinking|overlinking]] -- one example of which is "low-added-value items" such as years. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 02:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

276617 +++$+++ 1ne +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-21 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.156167060E09 +++$+++ How doesn't my source in the article about the '92 LA riots confirm that riots happened in SF, Dallas and Madison?  +++$+++ How doesn't my source in the article about the '92 LA riots confirm that riots happened in SF, Dallas and Madison? [[User:1ne|1ne]] 06:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
276618 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276617 +++$+++ 276617 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.156330200E09 +++$+++ They're spam because you, as an editor, have a conflict of interest. In the past year we have had increasing attempts to game Wikipedia; you may have heard that staffers from the House of Representatives were caught editing their bosses' articles. The concern is that they may introduce bias because they are not themselves neutral. In the same way you are not the best judge of your own website's usefulness. If you feel a particular news story is important to an article, as an editor you should have the responsibility to link to that news story from a generic site like Yahoo. It has nothing to do with pop-ups, and everything to do with self-interest. See [[Wikipedia:Spam#External_link_spamming]] and you will realize this isn't about whether or not I like you or your website. -- +++$+++ :They're spam because you, as an editor, have a conflict of interest. In the past year we have had increasing attempts to game Wikipedia; you may have heard that staffers from the House of Representatives were caught editing their bosses' articles. The concern is that they may introduce bias because they are not themselves neutral. In the same way you are not the best judge of your own website's usefulness. If you feel a particular news story is important to an article, as an editor you should have the responsibility to link to that news story from a generic site like Yahoo. It has nothing to do with pop-ups, and everything to do with self-interest. See [[Wikipedia:Spam#External_link_spamming]] and you will realize this isn't about whether or not I like you or your website. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 03:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
276619 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276617 +++$+++ 276617 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.156334220E09 +++$+++ Eight edits to Wikipedia articles, eight edits which add links to your site. I don't know why there's anything to discuss here. If there are other editors adding links in which they have a vested self-interest, they too are violating Wikipedia rules. If you wish to continue as a Wikipedia editor, with the intent of adding useful information to articles, you are of course welcome to do so. But abusing that position to create links to your website is an obvious conflict of interest, and contrary to the goal of creating an encyclopedia. Why is your article on smart pigging, for example, the best article on the web to link to? Are you capable of answering that question objectively? Of course not. -- +++$+++ :Eight edits to Wikipedia articles, eight edits which add links to your site. I don't know why there's anything to discuss here. If there are other editors adding links in which they have a vested self-interest, they too are violating Wikipedia rules. If you wish to continue as a Wikipedia editor, with the intent of adding useful information to articles, you are of course welcome to do so. But abusing that position to create links to your website is an obvious conflict of interest, and contrary to the goal of creating an encyclopedia. Why is your article on smart pigging, for example, the best article on the web to link to? Are you capable of answering that question objectively? Of course not. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 04:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
276620 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276617 +++$+++ 276617 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.156370100E09 +++$+++ Great! Good luck with your further ventures. -- +++$+++ :Great! Good luck with your further ventures. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 14:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

14476 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14476 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.310473560E09 +++$+++ By the way, I'm in the CUP, so if somehow I pull this off and promote all of them to FA, oh geez, so many points. I'll be more proud of these articles than the fail A330. Because you're a judge, I'd like to ask, how many points typically does the winner score? [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ By the way, I'm in the CUP, so if somehow I pull this off and promote all of them to FA, oh geez, so many points. I'll be more proud of these articles than the fail A330. Because you're a judge, I'd like to ask, how many points typically does the winner score? [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 05:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14477 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14476 +++$+++ 14476 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.310473860E09 +++$+++ Like I implicitly stated, that opinion is not shared by everyone. Good luck! It's a very noble project to undertake. :-) I can't answer that because the points have changed from the previous years and participation varies from year-to-year. Sorry!  +++$+++ :Like I implicitly stated, that opinion is not shared by everyone. Good luck! It's a very noble project to undertake. :-) I can't answer that because the points have changed from the previous years and participation varies from year-to-year. Sorry! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 05:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
14478 +++$+++ Sp33dyphil +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14476 +++$+++ 14477 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310562000E09 +++$+++ There', [[Sukhoi Su-37]] is almost done. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style=\"background:HotPink;color:white\">'''Sp33dyphil<\/span><\/small>''']] ''<sup>\"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]]  +++$+++ ::There', [[Sukhoi Su-37]] is almost done. [[User:Sp33dyphil|'''<small><span style="background:HotPink;color:white">'''Sp33dyphil</span></small>''']] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 06:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
14479 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14476 +++$+++ 14478 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.310565420E09 +++$+++ Looks good! I still wish they had put it into production though... it'd be hard to top an aircraft with the nickname 'Terminator'.  +++$+++ :::Looks good! I still wish they had put it into production though... it'd be hard to top an aircraft with the nickname 'Terminator'. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

276621 +++$+++ James Janderson +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-23 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.156347780E09 +++$+++ HI. what the hell are tthey doing removing the article count? Wikipedia has thousands of new visitors every day and now there is no info straight up to suggest the size of wikipedia. While the number of articles is clearly not as important as the quality it is always good no know how the project is developing. I SERIOUSLY suggest they change it back. I know that one of the first things that attracted me to wikipedia was seeing how many articles and the sheer size of it in figures which made me very curious. I see you agree with me. What can we do to make them return it. I also believe if they do not car about the article count at least start improving articles to feature status  +++$+++ HI. what the hell are tthey doing removing the article count? Wikipedia has thousands of new visitors every day and now there is no info straight up to suggest the size of wikipedia. While the number of articles is clearly not as important as the quality it is always good no know how the project is developing. I SERIOUSLY suggest they change it back. I know that one of the first things that attracted me to wikipedia was seeing how many articles and the sheer size of it in figures which made me very curious. I see you agree with me. What can we do to make them return it. I also believe if they do not car about the article count at least start improving articles to feature status [[User:James Janderson|James Janderson]] 08:43, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
276622 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276621 +++$+++ 276621 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.156370100E09 +++$+++ OK, generally I agree with you, but I don't have any more sway in this matter than you. -- +++$+++ :OK, generally I agree with you, but I don't have any more sway in this matter than you. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 14:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

538766 +++$+++ Gokhan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-07 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.147047540E09 +++$+++ Hi, I wanted to ask you something.  My grandfather's family is from Sofia and they told me one of our greatgrandfathers had made build a fountain (sebil\/\xe7e\u015fme) in Sofia.  Do you by change saw or heard about a Turkish\/Ottoman fountain like that?  -- +++$+++ Hi, I wanted to ask you something.  My grandfather's family is from Sofia and they told me one of our greatgrandfathers had made build a fountain (sebil/çeşme) in Sofia.  Do you by change saw or heard about a Turkish/Ottoman fountain like that?  --[[User:Gokhan|Gokhan]] 17:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
538767 +++$+++ Gokhan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538766 +++$+++ 538766 +++$+++ 2006-05-07 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.147047540E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for the feedback. I also think like you, probably no information will surface. Anyway, thanks.  -- +++$+++ : Hi, thanks for the feedback. I also think like you, probably no information will surface. Anyway, thanks.  --[[User:Gokhan|Gokhan]] 17:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

395629 +++$+++ The san gabriel mountains +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395629 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-15 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.305454860E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for the pointers.  It may take awhile, but do look for a Wikipedia page on Jack Green in the near future.  Best Wishes +++$+++ Thanks so much for the pointers.  It may take awhile, but do look for a Wikipedia page on Jack Green in the near future.  Best Wishes[[User:The san gabriel mountains|The san gabriel mountains]] ([[User talk:The san gabriel mountains|talk]]) 03:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
395630 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395629 +++$+++ 395629 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.305455580E09 +++$+++ I'll be watching for it - he sounds like an interesting character and I think I recall hearing about him years ago in relation to the Apollo missions or something.  +++$+++ :I'll be watching for it - he sounds like an interesting character and I think I recall hearing about him years ago in relation to the Apollo missions or something. [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] ([[User talk:Vsmith#top|talk]]) 03:33, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

14481 +++$+++ Sturmvogel 66 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14481 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.310587380E09 +++$+++ Your attention is drawn to [[:commons:Commons:Deletion_requests\/File:HMS_Glorious_last_picture.jpg|Commons:Deletion requests\/File:HMS Glorious last picture.jpg]]. Not sure what to do here.-- +++$+++ Your attention is drawn to [[:commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:HMS_Glorious_last_picture.jpg|Commons:Deletion requests/File:HMS Glorious last picture.jpg]]. Not sure what to do here.--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 13:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
14482 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14481 +++$+++ 14481 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.310607600E09 +++$+++ The NHHC states that any image they have is PD, so I don't think that's an issue. The bigger problem is that I can't find the image on history.navy.mil, which is weird considering we even have an identifying number.  +++$+++ :The NHHC states that any image they have is PD, so I don't think that's an issue. The bigger problem is that I can't find the image on history.navy.mil, which is weird considering we even have an identifying number. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 18:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

538770 +++$+++ Joey80 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538770 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-14 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.147621140E09 +++$+++ Hi! I would just like to know if it's all right for you to edit\/reformat the template, so it will conform to the format of other World Heritage templates (refer to [[Template:World Heritage Sites in Peru]], for example, you may also check [[Template:World Heritage Sites in Australia|Australia]], [[[[Template:World Heritage Sites in Brazil|Brazil]], [[Template:World Heritage Sites in China|China]], [[Template:World Heritage Sites in France|France]]...  +++$+++ Hi! I would just like to know if it's all right for you to edit/reformat the template, so it will conform to the format of other World Heritage templates (refer to [[Template:World Heritage Sites in Peru]], for example, you may also check [[Template:World Heritage Sites in Australia|Australia]], [[[[Template:World Heritage Sites in Brazil|Brazil]], [[Template:World Heritage Sites in China|China]], [[Template:World Heritage Sites in France|France]]... [[User:Joey80|Joey80]] 08:39, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
538771 +++$+++ Joey80 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538770 +++$+++ 538770 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.147622340E09 +++$+++ Oh, I'm using Explorer so I didn't notice it. Anyway, if you need any help, then I'll gladly edit the template for you. Thanks very much! +++$+++ :Oh, I'm using Explorer so I didn't notice it. Anyway, if you need any help, then I'll gladly edit the template for you. Thanks very much![[User:Joey80|Joey80]] 08:59, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

14483 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310688000E09 +++$+++ Hi Ed :) Per [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history\/Strategy#Regions_Task|this discussion]] the South American task force, of which you are a coordinator, has now been expanded to cover Central America as well. The new task force can be found at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Central and South American military history task force]]. I've left a redirect at the old title but you may wish to update your watchlist accordingly. Best,  +++$+++ Hi Ed :) Per [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history/Strategy#Regions_Task|this discussion]] the South American task force, of which you are a coordinator, has now been expanded to cover Central America as well. The new task force can be found at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Central and South American military history task force]]. I've left a redirect at the old title but you may wish to update your watchlist accordingly. Best, [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 17:00, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
14484 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14483 +++$+++ 14483 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.310696460E09 +++$+++ Hi ES! Thanks for the note, I've added the new page to my watchlist. :-)  +++$+++ :Hi ES! Thanks for the note, I've added the new page to my watchlist. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 19:21, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
14485 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14483 +++$+++ 14484 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.310696520E09 +++$+++ Actually the watch feature moved with the page when you moved it, but no harm done!  +++$+++ ::Actually the watch feature moved with the page when you moved it, but no harm done! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 19:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
14486 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14483 +++$+++ 14485 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.310744160E09 +++$+++ Cool, I didn't know it did that...  +++$+++ :::Cool, I didn't know it did that... [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 08:36, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
14487 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14483 +++$+++ 14486 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.310748000E09 +++$+++ Neither did I. ;-)  +++$+++ ::::Neither did I. ;-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 09:40, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

14488 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.310734680E09 +++$+++ Hello. I notice that you removed a comment that I placed on [[User talk:Brad101|Brad101's talk page]]: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Brad101&diff=439566738&oldid=439565883]. I am trying to be courteous and assuming good faith, but I believe your edit was wrong. Please do not do anything like that again.  +++$+++ Hello. I notice that you removed a comment that I placed on [[User talk:Brad101|Brad101's talk page]]: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brad101&diff=439566738&oldid=439565883]. I am trying to be courteous and assuming good faith, but I believe your edit was wrong. Please do not do anything like that again. [[User:Bulldog73|Bulldog]] [[User talk:Bulldog73|<sup>talk</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Bulldog73|<sup>da contribs</sup>]] [[Special:Random|<sup>go rando</sup>]] 05:58, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
14489 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14488 +++$+++ 14488 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.310748000E09 +++$+++ Hiya Bulldog, you need to see [[WP:REMOVED]]. Brad is well within his 'rights' to remove your comment. Please don't insist on restoring it; not everyone is a fan of Wikilove.  +++$+++ :Hiya Bulldog, you need to see [[WP:REMOVED]]. Brad is well within his 'rights' to remove your comment. Please don't insist on restoring it; not everyone is a fan of Wikilove. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 09:40, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
14490 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14488 +++$+++ 14489 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 06:23:00 +++$+++ 1.310822580E09 +++$+++ I thought that Brad was being rude by removing my comments. Sorry.  +++$+++ ::I thought that Brad was being rude by removing my comments. Sorry. [[User:Bulldog73|Bulldog]] [[User talk:Bulldog73|<sup>talk</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Bulldog73|<sup>da contribs</sup>]] [[Special:Random|<sup>go rando</sup>]] 06:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

276633 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.156853040E09 +++$+++ I\"m not going to get into a pissing match with the hard-heads on that thread, but I'm a producer for the NBC station in Atlanta. Delta, Comair and the NTSB, in all their communications with us have referred to the flight as Comair 5191. I'd wager that the persons who are so married to 191 have no other logical reason to remain married to the term. -- +++$+++ I"m not going to get into a pissing match with the hard-heads on that thread, but I'm a producer for the NBC station in Atlanta. Delta, Comair and the NTSB, in all their communications with us have referred to the flight as Comair 5191. I'd wager that the persons who are so married to 191 have no other logical reason to remain married to the term. --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] 05:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
276634 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276633 +++$+++ 276633 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.156853460E09 +++$+++ Transportation attracts its share of [[otaku]]\/[[anorak]] types. I've been well acquainted with train and highway geeks in the past (warning: do not debate Interstate highway numbering systems with a roadgeek, unless you have hours to spare). There seems to be a mass delusion here that the technical designation is the \"correct\" one for some reason, as well as some other POV and OR interpretations. Anyway, I've already had my Talk page vandalized once over this. -- +++$+++ :Transportation attracts its share of [[otaku]]/[[anorak]] types. I've been well acquainted with train and highway geeks in the past (warning: do not debate Interstate highway numbering systems with a roadgeek, unless you have hours to spare). There seems to be a mass delusion here that the technical designation is the "correct" one for some reason, as well as some other POV and OR interpretations. Anyway, I've already had my Talk page vandalized once over this. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 05:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

14491 +++$+++ Jheald +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310750040E09 +++$+++ Can I ask: was this really the implication that you intended in making this change?  And do you really think the RfC expressed consensus support for such a position?   +++$+++ Can I ask: was this really the implication that you intended in making this change?  And do you really think the RfC expressed consensus support for such a position?  [[User:Jheald|Jheald]] ([[User talk:Jheald|talk]]) 10:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
14492 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14491 +++$+++ 14491 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.310750340E09 +++$+++ Yes, it was what I intended and yes, I realize what that changes policy-wise. No, I didn't say I thought it was the best idea. However, there was a clear consensus for removing the wording, and absolutely no consensus for any replacement in the subsequent sections. For better or worse, that's how Wikipedia works.  +++$+++ :Yes, it was what I intended and yes, I realize what that changes policy-wise. No, I didn't say I thought it was the best idea. However, there was a clear consensus for removing the wording, and absolutely no consensus for any replacement in the subsequent sections. For better or worse, that's how Wikipedia works. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 10:19, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
14493 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14491 +++$+++ 14492 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.310753520E09 +++$+++ The discussion in the latter sections was ongoing and though it did not amount to concluding an alternative wording, it clearly did conclude that merely removing the phrase was unsatisfactory, for exactly the reasons Jheald listed. This does not change policy on the matter- the policy is and was the NFCC, not the NFCI- but it does mean that, now, the guideline is inconsistent with policy. That's a poor close whether or not a lot of people voted in support of it. In any case, I have started a new section to continue the discussion; clearly, the NFCI entry as it was was unsatisfactory. That much is clear from the RfC. But that does not mean that we should change it to something else unsatisfactory, shrug our shoulders and hope nothing bad happens.  +++$+++ ::The discussion in the latter sections was ongoing and though it did not amount to concluding an alternative wording, it clearly did conclude that merely removing the phrase was unsatisfactory, for exactly the reasons Jheald listed. This does not change policy on the matter- the policy is and was the NFCC, not the NFCI- but it does mean that, now, the guideline is inconsistent with policy. That's a poor close whether or not a lot of people voted in support of it. In any case, I have started a new section to continue the discussion; clearly, the NFCI entry as it was was unsatisfactory. That much is clear from the RfC. But that does not mean that we should change it to something else unsatisfactory, shrug our shoulders and hope nothing bad happens. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 11:12, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
14494 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14491 +++$+++ 14493 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310784540E09 +++$+++ Heh, well my reading was that people wanted the removal of the phrase, and the discussion beneath involved a smaller number of participants who couldn't decide what to replace it with. I'm fully supportive of any effort to find a replacement (and in retrospect, I should have archived only the first section) and hope you can find a solution; as I said, I don't like the current wording any more than you do, but maybe that should be a talk reserved for the people who supported the original proposal. :-)  +++$+++ :::Heh, well my reading was that people wanted the removal of the phrase, and the discussion beneath involved a smaller number of participants who couldn't decide what to replace it with. I'm fully supportive of any effort to find a replacement (and in retrospect, I should have archived only the first section) and hope you can find a solution; as I said, I don't like the current wording any more than you do, but maybe that should be a talk reserved for the people who supported the original proposal. :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 19:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
14495 +++$+++ Cunard +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14491 +++$+++ 14494 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310890800E09 +++$+++ I believe you assessed the consensus correctly, though the consensus may have been wrong and undesirable. A difficult closure, Ed. One I'm glad I didn't have to make. Thank you for your bravery and willingness to close this RfC! Best,  +++$+++ ::::I believe you assessed the consensus correctly, though the consensus may have been wrong and undesirable. A difficult closure, Ed. One I'm glad I didn't have to make. Thank you for your bravery and willingness to close this RfC! Best, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 01:20, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

276637 +++$+++ 165.236.112.245 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276637 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-29 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.156885380E09 +++$+++ The flight was initially known as Comair 191.  The flight plan is a reliable and verifiable source that has been cited in talk page discussions.  A google for Comair 191 reveals that a number of news agencies (reliable sources) also referred to the flight as Comair 191 initially.  It seems now, however, that nearly everyone has adopted Comair 5191, including the NTSB in the preliminary report.  While it annoys me that such authorities have apparently redesignated this flight with a new name (for whatever reason, I won't bother to speculate), I do recognize that the page should probably be moved back if in fact the new name continues to stick.  What you should recognize, Dhartung, is that your numerous interjections all over the talk page are inflamatory and unnecessary.  Once is enough; relentlessly berating people with rules is not helpful.  If you tone it down a little and relax, I suspect you'll get your way in the end anyhow.  +++$+++ The flight was initially known as Comair 191.  The flight plan is a reliable and verifiable source that has been cited in talk page discussions.  A google for Comair 191 reveals that a number of news agencies (reliable sources) also referred to the flight as Comair 191 initially.  It seems now, however, that nearly everyone has adopted Comair 5191, including the NTSB in the preliminary report.  While it annoys me that such authorities have apparently redesignated this flight with a new name (for whatever reason, I won't bother to speculate), I do recognize that the page should probably be moved back if in fact the new name continues to stick.  What you should recognize, Dhartung, is that your numerous interjections all over the talk page are inflamatory and unnecessary.  Once is enough; relentlessly berating people with rules is not helpful.  If you tone it down a little and relax, I suspect you'll get your way in the end anyhow. [[User:165.236.112.245|165.236.112.245]] 14:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
276638 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276637 +++$+++ 276637 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.156939140E09 +++$+++ \"Inflammatory\"? Oh, good grief. I engaged in no personal attacks. When Wikipedia insists on using a name for an article that's different from what, well, '''everybody else in the world''' is using, for reasons that only make sense to airgeeks, I have no regrets about enforcing policy. Rules are sometimes unforgiving. If you don't like rules, you're not going to like Wikipedia, so I suggest you remain unregistered. -- +++$+++ :"Inflammatory"? Oh, good grief. I engaged in no personal attacks. When Wikipedia insists on using a name for an article that's different from what, well, '''everybody else in the world''' is using, for reasons that only make sense to airgeeks, I have no regrets about enforcing policy. Rules are sometimes unforgiving. If you don't like rules, you're not going to like Wikipedia, so I suggest you remain unregistered. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 04:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

276639 +++$+++ RandomCritic +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-30 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.156970280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the good reorg on [[Outer planets in fiction]].  +++$+++ Thanks for the good reorg on [[Outer planets in fiction]]. [[User:RandomCritic|RandomCritic]] 13:38, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
276640 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276639 +++$+++ 276639 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.156989360E09 +++$+++ You're welcome, and thank you for creating it! That solved an awkward problem where the list sensibly related to more than one article. -- +++$+++ :You're welcome, and thank you for creating it! That solved an awkward problem where the list sensibly related to more than one article. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 18:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

14496 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310778840E09 +++$+++ ...to get out and learn something more. [http:\/\/www.winchester.ac.uk\/academicdepartments\/history\/postgraduatestudies\/Documents\/Michael%20Hicks%20studentships%20July%202011%20outline.pdf Voila!]  +++$+++ ...to get out and learn something more. [http://www.winchester.ac.uk/academicdepartments/history/postgraduatestudies/Documents/Michael%20Hicks%20studentships%20July%202011%20outline.pdf Voila!] [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 18:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
14497 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14496 +++$+++ 14496 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310784540E09 +++$+++ That early medieval warfare one looks really fun, but the problem is that I'm not a graduate student about to receive a master's degree. ;-)  +++$+++ :That early medieval warfare one looks really fun, but the problem is that I'm not a graduate student about to receive a master's degree. ;-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 19:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
14498 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14496 +++$+++ 14497 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.310788320E09 +++$+++ Well, get on it then!  +++$+++ ::Well, get on it then! [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

538785 +++$+++ Makedonia +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538785 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-24 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.148456700E09 +++$+++ a federation?? haha it gets more insane everyday. -- +++$+++ a federation?? haha it gets more insane everyday. --[[User:Makedonia|Makedonia]] 00:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
538786 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538785 +++$+++ 538785 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.148505180E09 +++$+++ You know, the world is full of such \"Macedonian\" examples. There is Moldova, which was separated from Romania by the Soviet Union, there is Cyprus which was separated from Greece by Turkey, there is Republika Srpska which is separated from Serbia by NATO, there is Kosovo which was separated from Albania by Yugoslavia, and finally we have the Republic of Macedonia, which was separated from Bulgaria by Yugoslavia. -- +++$+++ :You know, the world is full of such "Macedonian" examples. There is Moldova, which was separated from Romania by the Soviet Union, there is Cyprus which was separated from Greece by Turkey, there is Republika Srpska which is separated from Serbia by NATO, there is Kosovo which was separated from Albania by Yugoslavia, and finally we have the Republic of Macedonia, which was separated from Bulgaria by Yugoslavia. --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 14:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
538787 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538785 +++$+++ 538785 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.148526060E09 +++$+++ I read somewhere that the likelihood of two states with the same ethnicity to merge into one is proportional to the ratio of their common border to the length of the border of the smaller one. For Moldova and Romania that is 450\/1,389 = 32%. For the Republic and Bulgaria = 148\/748 = 20%, For Kosovo and Albania = 114\/~450 = ~25%, and Republica Srpska and Serbia: 312\/2170 = 14%  +++$+++ :I read somewhere that the likelihood of two states with the same ethnicity to merge into one is proportional to the ratio of their common border to the length of the border of the smaller one. For Moldova and Romania that is 450/1,389 = 32%. For the Republic and Bulgaria = 148/748 = 20%, For Kosovo and Albania = 114/~450 = ~25%, and Republica Srpska and Serbia: 312/2170 = 14% [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 20:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
538788 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538785 +++$+++ 538787 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.148574600E09 +++$+++ That's curious :) But now, I don't think there's another way to estimate the likelihood so we could check!  +++$+++ :: That's curious :) But now, I don't think there's another way to estimate the likelihood so we could check! [[User:TodorBozhinov|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:black; padding:1px;background:#fff">Todor<span style="color:white;background:#584">&nbsp;Bozh<span style="background:#e00">inov&nbsp;</span></span></span>]] [[User talk:TodorBozhinov|→]] 09:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
538789 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538785 +++$+++ 538788 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.148574840E09 +++$+++ What about Greece and Cyprus? -- +++$+++ :::What about Greece and Cyprus? --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 09:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
538790 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538785 +++$+++ 538789 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.148596800E09 +++$+++ Well that formula does not work for islands. It can estimate for North Cyprus and Greek Cyprus.  +++$+++ ::::Well that formula does not work for islands. It can estimate for North Cyprus and Greek Cyprus. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 15:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
538791 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538785 +++$+++ 538790 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.148596920E09 +++$+++ How about [[Armenia]] and [[Nagorno-Karabakh]]? -- +++$+++ :::::How about [[Armenia]] and [[Nagorno-Karabakh]]? --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 15:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
538792 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538785 +++$+++ 538791 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.148597460E09 +++$+++ That's a very complicated situation, like an island. Btw East germany to West Germany:  1381\/~2157 = ~64%  +++$+++ ::::::That's a very complicated situation, like an island. Btw East germany to West Germany:  1381/~2157 = ~64% [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 15:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

14499 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.310787840E09 +++$+++ Help me out here, Ed. I don't understand the basics--or the article isn't very well written. Is Jyoti the name of a ship? the name of a class of ships? both? are all four called Jyoti? Should the article be [[INS Jyoti]], with a related article [[Komandarm Fedko class]]? This is too military for me. Thanks, on behalf of the Indian Navy,  +++$+++ Help me out here, Ed. I don't understand the basics--or the article isn't very well written. Is Jyoti the name of a ship? the name of a class of ships? both? are all four called Jyoti? Should the article be [[INS Jyoti]], with a related article [[Komandarm Fedko class]]? This is too military for me. Thanks, on behalf of the Indian Navy, [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
14500 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14499 +++$+++ 14499 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.310818740E09 +++$+++ I think it's fixed now. I'm guessing the original Soviet ship was named \"Komandarm Fedko\", but I can't find anything on the civilian ships.  +++$+++ :I think it's fixed now. I'm guessing the original Soviet ship was named "Komandarm Fedko", but I can't find anything on the civilian ships. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 05:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

14501 +++$+++ AustralianRupert +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14501 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-16 09:06:00 +++$+++ 1.310832360E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | By order of the ''[[WP:MILHIST|Military history WikiProject coordinators]]'', for your devoted work on the WikiProject's [[WP:MHPR|Peer]], [[WP:MHR#A-CLASS|A-Class]] and [[WP:FAC|Featured Article]] reviews for the period Apr\u2013Jun 2011, I am delighted to award you this ''Content Review Medal''.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | By order of the ''[[WP:MILHIST|Military history WikiProject coordinators]]'', for your devoted work on the WikiProject's [[WP:MHPR|Peer]], [[WP:MHR#A-CLASS|A-Class]] and [[WP:FAC|Featured Article]] reviews for the period Apr–Jun 2011, I am delighted to award you this ''Content Review Medal''. [[User:AustralianRupert|AustralianRupert]] ([[User talk:AustralianRupert|talk]]) 09:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
14502 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14501 +++$+++ 14501 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310871300E09 +++$+++ Thanks Aussie!  +++$+++ :Thanks Aussie! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 19:55, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

276646 +++$+++ ThePromenader +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276646 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-05 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.157503320E09 +++$+++ A few of us have managed to come into agreement over an \"in the Paris area\" title - as a former participant in the discussion, your views and vote on the matter would much be welcome at [[Talk:List of tallest buildings and structures in Paris]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ A few of us have managed to come into agreement over an "in the Paris area" title - as a former participant in the discussion, your views and vote on the matter would much be welcome at [[Talk:List of tallest buildings and structures in Paris]]. Thank you. [[User:ThePromenader|<span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE<span style="color:#aba67e;">PROMENADER</span></span>]] 17:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
276647 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276646 +++$+++ 276646 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.157539200E09 +++$+++ Ah, but it's also a fact that I just had ice cream for dessert, so you can see that not all facts are equally notable. I don't think there's any reason that the encyclopedia article on a band -- usually about 1000-2000 words -- reference one specific obscure charity project they're involved in. That is, it isn't something inherent to the understanding of the subject. Especially when it isn't specific to any one band -- that actually manages to make it less notable for each individual band, compared to if one charity and one celebrity hooked up for a long-term exclusive venture. You seem like a reasonable person, but I hope you realize that additions to Wikipedia should be judged on their overall encyclopedic value. In the long run, your project may indeed achieve that, but brand-new things generally do not, it's just the way things are. Ultimately you should be able to see that if Wikipedia just let anybody add URLs to band articles the value of the encyclopedia would be destroyed, so we have to have some sort of regulation. Our [[WP:EL|external links policy]] is pretty strict for this reason, and so is our article creation policy as you found. I'm much more permissive than many editors so understand that I'm serious when I say I thought about your project and I don't think it belongs. There are many ways to get out the word on your project using the internet, but Wikipedia isn't one of them, because it exists for things whose word is already out.-- +++$+++ :Ah, but it's also a fact that I just had ice cream for dessert, so you can see that not all facts are equally notable. I don't think there's any reason that the encyclopedia article on a band -- usually about 1000-2000 words -- reference one specific obscure charity project they're involved in. That is, it isn't something inherent to the understanding of the subject. Especially when it isn't specific to any one band -- that actually manages to make it less notable for each individual band, compared to if one charity and one celebrity hooked up for a long-term exclusive venture. You seem like a reasonable person, but I hope you realize that additions to Wikipedia should be judged on their overall encyclopedic value. In the long run, your project may indeed achieve that, but brand-new things generally do not, it's just the way things are. Ultimately you should be able to see that if Wikipedia just let anybody add URLs to band articles the value of the encyclopedia would be destroyed, so we have to have some sort of regulation. Our [[WP:EL|external links policy]] is pretty strict for this reason, and so is our article creation policy as you found. I'm much more permissive than many editors so understand that I'm serious when I say I thought about your project and I don't think it belongs. There are many ways to get out the word on your project using the internet, but Wikipedia isn't one of them, because it exists for things whose word is already out.--[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 03:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
276648 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276646 +++$+++ 276646 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.167382860E09 +++$+++ It does look like there is starting to be information from reliable independent sources. The next step is to post at [[WP:DRV|deletion review]], pointing out that there are new sources that were not available at the time of the prior deletion. It's best to be able to point to articles at the publisher's website rather than your own. -- +++$+++ :It does look like there is starting to be information from reliable independent sources. The next step is to post at [[WP:DRV|deletion review]], pointing out that there are new sources that were not available at the time of the prior deletion. It's best to be able to point to articles at the publisher's website rather than your own. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 01:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

14503 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311065460E09 +++$+++ Would you mind taking a look at this article, presently at FAC and make sure I haven't misused any military terms?  Many thanks.-- +++$+++ Would you mind taking a look at this article, presently at FAC and make sure I haven't misused any military terms?  Many thanks.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
14504 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14503 +++$+++ 14503 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311123060E09 +++$+++ Looks good to me, Wehwalt. Nice article.  +++$+++ :Looks good to me, Wehwalt. Nice article. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 17:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
14505 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14503 +++$+++ 14504 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.311129600E09 +++$+++ Many thanks on both counts.-- +++$+++ ::Many thanks on both counts.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 19:40, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

276649 +++$+++ Steve block +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-06 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.157563860E09 +++$+++ Any reason why you want this restored, it's copyright violating material and a blatant advertisement.  I can restore it, but I'd also have to copyvio it. Let me know your thinking.  +++$+++ Any reason why you want this restored, it's copyright violating material and a blatant advertisement.  I can restore it, but I'd also have to copyvio it. Let me know your thinking. [[User:Steve block|Steve block]] <small>[[User talk:Steve block|Talk]]</small> 10:31, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
276650 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276649 +++$+++ 276649 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 10:33:00 +++$+++ 1.157563980E09 +++$+++ Oh! In that case I don't need it; I had no idea what the contents were (I'm basically assuming it's the local company), and I wondered if it was something fixable. If you can, could you tell me the source of the copyvio? -- +++$+++ :Oh! In that case I don't need it; I had no idea what the contents were (I'm basically assuming it's the local company), and I wondered if it was something fixable. If you can, could you tell me the source of the copyvio? --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 10:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
276651 +++$+++ Steve block +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276649 +++$+++ 276650 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.157564220E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.hufcor.com\/company.shtml here]. The first, third and fourth sections, word for word cut and paste job.  +++$+++ ::[http://www.hufcor.com/company.shtml here]. The first, third and fourth sections, word for word cut and paste job. [[User:Steve block|Steve block]] <small>[[User talk:Steve block|Talk]]</small> 10:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
276652 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276649 +++$+++ 276651 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.157564340E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much, Steve! -- +++$+++ :::Thanks very much, Steve! --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 10:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
276653 +++$+++ Steve block +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276649 +++$+++ 276652 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.157564460E09 +++$+++ No problem.  I'll remove the request from [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\/Contested prod]].  +++$+++ ::::No problem.  I'll remove the request from [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Contested prod]]. [[User:Steve block|Steve block]] <small>[[User talk:Steve block|Talk]]</small> 10:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

538794 +++$+++ PajaBG +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-25 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.148586600E09 +++$+++ Hello To\u0161e :o) The highest point of Serbia is the \u0110aravica peak (2,656 m) on Prokletije mountains in Kosovo. There are at least dozen of prominent peaks 2169-2656, but they are all on Kosovo itself or (future) border of Kosovo with Macedonia, Albania and Montenegro. When they take it completely away, yes, the Mid\u017eor will be the highest peak in Serbia  +++$+++ Hello Toše :o) The highest point of Serbia is the Đaravica peak (2,656 m) on Prokletije mountains in Kosovo. There are at least dozen of prominent peaks 2169-2656, but they are all on Kosovo itself or (future) border of Kosovo with Macedonia, Albania and Montenegro. When they take it completely away, yes, the Midžor will be the highest peak in Serbia [[User:PajaBG|PajaBG]] 12:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
538795 +++$+++ PajaBG +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538794 +++$+++ 538794 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.148596320E09 +++$+++ Yes, Triglav, 2,863 m. For decades we used to learn that and we all knew it. I believe that today 99% of people here have no clue what is the name of the highest peak in Serbia.  +++$+++ : Yes, Triglav, 2,863 m. For decades we used to learn that and we all knew it. I believe that today 99% of people here have no clue what is the name of the highest peak in Serbia. [[User:PajaBG|PajaBG]] 15:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
538796 +++$+++ PajaBG +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538794 +++$+++ 538795 +++$+++ 2006-05-28 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.148827560E09 +++$+++ Hello...can I ask you for a favor? When you have enough spare time, could you please check the [[Drina]] article and do some copyediting? Thanks in advance  +++$+++ :: Hello...can I ask you for a favor? When you have enough spare time, could you please check the [[Drina]] article and do some copyediting? Thanks in advance [[User:PajaBG|PajaBG]] 07:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
538797 +++$+++ PajaBG +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538794 +++$+++ 538796 +++$+++ 2006-05-28 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.148845500E09 +++$+++ No difference between \u0107uprija and most. Like you said, the former is a Turkish word, not being used often anymore. But the word survives...maybe because of the \u0106uprija town. Young people don't use it unless someone older don't use it first :o) To a certain extent, \u0107uprija may be applied to the small bridge (and 'most' for the big one), but Pavlovi\u0107a \u0107uprija is no small bridge. Also, it could be used as a joke, when you wish to diminish the importance or size of some bridge, call it \u0107uprija instead of a 'most'.  +++$+++ ::: No difference between ćuprija and most. Like you said, the former is a Turkish word, not being used often anymore. But the word survives...maybe because of the Ćuprija town. Young people don't use it unless someone older don't use it first :o) To a certain extent, ćuprija may be applied to the small bridge (and 'most' for the big one), but Pavlovića ćuprija is no small bridge. Also, it could be used as a joke, when you wish to diminish the importance or size of some bridge, call it ćuprija instead of a 'most'. [[User:PajaBG|PajaBG]] 12:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
538798 +++$+++ PajaBG +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538794 +++$+++ 538795 +++$+++ 2006-06-04 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.149482040E09 +++$+++ Hello. LOL...check the [[Drina]] again.  +++$+++ :: Hello. LOL...check the [[Drina]] again. [[User:PajaBG|PajaBG]] 21:34, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
538799 +++$+++ PajaBG +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538794 +++$+++ 538794 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.149540600E09 +++$+++ Thanks. You're a pal ;o)  +++$+++ : Thanks. You're a pal ;o) [[User:PajaBG|PajaBG]] 13:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

14507 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311579000E09 +++$+++ ...for keeping my talk clear. IDK who that IP was; random weirdness - cheers. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ ...for keeping my talk clear. IDK who that IP was; random weirdness - cheers. <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 00:30, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
14508 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14507 +++$+++ 14507 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311579240E09 +++$+++ Anytime Chzz. It wasn't even vandalism really, so I didn't bother to leave a message on the IP's talk.  +++$+++ :Anytime Chzz. It wasn't even vandalism really, so I didn't bother to leave a message on the IP's talk. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 00:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

14509 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14509 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311620280E09 +++$+++ Thanks. :) He's restored it, and I've archived it in place. I won't be responding to him any further. I'm going to be traveling (though I won't be completely out of touch) but am perfectly happy for you to RBI and\/or semi-protect as seems necessary. -- +++$+++ Thanks. :) He's restored it, and I've archived it in place. I won't be responding to him any further. I'm going to be traveling (though I won't be completely out of touch) but am perfectly happy for you to RBI and/or semi-protect as seems necessary. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 11:58, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
14510 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14509 +++$+++ 14509 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.311644640E09 +++$+++ Well, I've already started doing that haha. Safe travels!  +++$+++ :Well, I've already started doing that haha. Safe travels! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 18:44, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
14511 +++$+++ Ling.Nut2 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14509 +++$+++ 14509 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 08:44:00 +++$+++ 1.311695040E09 +++$+++ See [[User talk:Dominic]]. &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp; +++$+++ * See [[User talk:Dominic]]. &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut2|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut2|Nut]] 08:44, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
14512 +++$+++ Ling.Nut2 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14509 +++$+++ 14511 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.311706020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the barnstar, and you're welcome for the help. I'm '''hoping''' to get more active September\/October-ish, and if I am able to do so, I'm leaning toward making MILHIST my new home for a while. Will probably start out on on U.S. Civil War battles, but would be willing to work on other things if it seems like a good topic. Cheers! &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp; +++$+++ ** Thanks for the barnstar, and you're welcome for the help. I'm '''hoping''' to get more active September/October-ish, and if I am able to do so, I'm leaning toward making MILHIST my new home for a while. Will probably start out on on U.S. Civil War battles, but would be willing to work on other things if it seems like a good topic. Cheers! &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut2|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut2|Nut]] 11:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
14513 +++$+++ Ling.Nut2 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14509 +++$+++ 14512 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 08:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311782280E09 +++$+++ Me loves people who check their facts. I can't promise I'll be able to do anything, but I will definitely keep you in mind. Excellent work on the verification of naval images, BTW. &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp; +++$+++ ***Me loves people who check their facts. I can't promise I'll be able to do anything, but I will definitely keep you in mind. Excellent work on the verification of naval images, BTW. &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut2|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut2|Nut]] 08:58, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

570397 +++$+++ Rocket000 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-17 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.213707060E09 +++$+++ I know you're not a Commons person, but you seem like nice guy who *hopefully* ''maybe'' has a little bit of time to spare and can help me out. (I don't mean editing over there, just some advice\u2014unless you want to of course. :) Thanks for your time.  +++$+++ I know you're not a Commons person, but you seem like nice guy who *hopefully* ''maybe'' has a little bit of time to spare and can help me out. (I don't mean editing over there, just some advice—unless you want to of course. :) Thanks for your time. [[User:Rocket000|Rocket000]] ([[User talk:Rocket000|talk]]) 05:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
570398 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570397 +++$+++ 570397 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.213732740E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 12:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
570399 +++$+++ Rocket000 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570397 +++$+++ 570398 +++$+++ 2008-06-19 08:40:00 +++$+++ 1.213890000E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I got some studying to do. ;) thanks again for all your help! Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Anyway, I got some studying to do. ;) thanks again for all your help! Cheers, [[User:Rocket000|Rocket000]] ([[User talk:Rocket000|talk]]) 08:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
570400 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570397 +++$+++ 570399 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.214010000E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 18:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
570401 +++$+++ Rocket000 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570397 +++$+++ 570400 +++$+++ 2008-06-21 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.214040360E09 +++$+++ Well, look at the new class I [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=MediaWiki%3ACommon.css&diff=12283499&oldid=12040355 added] on June 17, and then check out the [[:commons:Template:DELheader|template that uses it]]. The style is in effect yet that was only a few days ago (it worked instantly, btw). The whole thing with displaying Commons pages on other projects is very interesting. I'm pretty sure styles work even if they are not defined locally because some maintenance templates use some en.wp doesn't have and it works fine (I think). I'll have to do some tests. Maybe there's a really good reason ''not'' to use CSS on Commons (unless it's main.css or something).  +++$+++ ::::Well, look at the new class I [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki%3ACommon.css&diff=12283499&oldid=12040355 added] on June 17, and then check out the [[:commons:Template:DELheader|template that uses it]]. The style is in effect yet that was only a few days ago (it worked instantly, btw). The whole thing with displaying Commons pages on other projects is very interesting. I'm pretty sure styles work even if they are not defined locally because some maintenance templates use some en.wp doesn't have and it works fine (I think). I'll have to do some tests. Maybe there's a really good reason ''not'' to use CSS on Commons (unless it's main.css or something). [[User:Rocket000|Rocket000]] ([[User talk:Rocket000|talk]]) 02:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
570402 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570397 +++$+++ 570401 +++$+++ 2008-06-21 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.214041500E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 02:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

538800 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538800 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-25 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.148593380E09 +++$+++ '''[[WP:AN3#User:TodorBozhinov]]:''' ha ha ha ha ha ha... I can't help myself... Hahaaa ha ha haaaaaha! Jesus! Ha ha ha! Aha ha! Ha! '''[[List of Internet slang#L|LMTO]]'''!! Man, I give you a free revert in case we ever engage in an edit-war (which I highly doubt). Congrats! You made my evening!  +++$+++ '''[[WP:AN3#User:TodorBozhinov]]:''' ha ha ha ha ha ha... I can't help myself... Hahaaa ha ha haaaaaha! Jesus! Ha ha ha! Aha ha! Ha! '''[[List of Internet slang#L|LMTO]]'''!! Man, I give you a free revert in case we ever engage in an edit-war (which I highly doubt). Congrats! You made my evening! [[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#778">&nbsp;<span style="background:#889">N<span style="background:#99a">i<span style="background:#aab">k<span style="background:#bbc">o<span style="background:#ccd"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 14:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
538801 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538800 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.148596620E09 +++$+++ I must admit that was pretty honorable, and potentially saved him from being blocked. Still better that way than let the ''enemy camp'' get you :))  +++$+++ ::I must admit that was pretty honorable, and potentially saved him from being blocked. Still better that way than let the ''enemy camp'' get you :)) [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 15:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
538802 +++$+++ NikoSilver +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538800 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.148601060E09 +++$+++ Funny AND smart!  +++$+++ :::Funny AND smart! [[User:NikoSilver|<span style="color:white;background:#778">&nbsp;<span style="background:#889">N<span style="background:#99a">i<span style="background:#aab">k<span style="background:#bbc">o<span style="background:#ccd"><b>S</b></span><b>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b></span>&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:NikoSilver|(T)]] [[Special:Emailuser/NikoSilver|@]] [[Special:Contributions/NikoSilver|(C)]]</font></sup> 16:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

276657 +++$+++ BirgitteSB +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-13 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.158196200E09 +++$+++ Sorry I cannot be of any help in this case.  The only reason I had such good information about [[I Have a Dream]] is because of correspondence with a lawyer over the copyright of orations.  I was looking for answers on how to deal with these things at Wikisource.  I got detailed reply explaining how often the answer to copyright questions is unknown and using that court case as an example.  It is a common misconception that these sorts of things are cut and dry.  I would probably just add a line to that article stating \"Because of these discrepencies the copyright status is uncertain in most juristictions.\"-- +++$+++ Sorry I cannot be of any help in this case.  The only reason I had such good information about [[I Have a Dream]] is because of correspondence with a lawyer over the copyright of orations.  I was looking for answers on how to deal with these things at Wikisource.  I got detailed reply explaining how often the answer to copyright questions is unknown and using that court case as an example.  It is a common misconception that these sorts of things are cut and dry.  I would probably just add a line to that article stating "Because of these discrepencies the copyright status is uncertain in most juristictions."--[[User:BirgitteSB|<font color="#f4a460 ">Birgitte§β</font>]] ʈ [[User talk:BirgitteSB|<small><font color="#778899">Talk</font></small>]] 18:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
276658 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276657 +++$+++ 276657 +++$+++ 2006-09-18 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.158576900E09 +++$+++ It is not a \"theory\" that Hanson was the first President. He was the ''third'' President of Congress, which is not vague, and is amply discussed in the article. The urban legend that he was the \"first\" President of the United States is nonsense. It has nothing to do with the Treaty of Paris. What history books are you using for this \"theory\"?-- +++$+++ :It is not a "theory" that Hanson was the first President. He was the ''third'' President of Congress, which is not vague, and is amply discussed in the article. The urban legend that he was the "first" President of the United States is nonsense. It has nothing to do with the Treaty of Paris. What history books are you using for this "theory"?--[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 03:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

14514 +++$+++ Dankarl +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14514 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311785940E09 +++$+++ Since you have contact info, could you pass on to the NARA uploader that the photo in [[:File:Eskimos harpooning a whale, Point Barrow, Alaska, 1935 - NARA - 531123.tif]] does not match its title. It's in the Signal Corps set. Thanks,  +++$+++ Since you have contact info, could you pass on to the NARA uploader that the photo in [[:File:Eskimos harpooning a whale, Point Barrow, Alaska, 1935 - NARA - 531123.tif]] does not match its title. It's in the Signal Corps set. Thanks, [[User:Dankarl|Dankarl]] ([[User talk:Dankarl|talk]]) 09:59, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14515 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14514 +++$+++ 14514 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.311786660E09 +++$+++ [[User:Dominic]] is the Wikipedian-in-Residence at NARA; I'll point him to this post. It looks like the image should be [http:\/\/www.archives.gov\/research\/native-americans\/pictures\/select-list-088.html this one], but I can't locate what the title of the image actually uploaded is (it's not located [http:\/\/www.archives.gov\/research\/native-americans\/pictures\/ here], and various Google searches for \"Stanley Morgan 1935\" and\/or \"Eskimo holding gun\" haven't turned anything up).  +++$+++ :[[User:Dominic]] is the Wikipedian-in-Residence at NARA; I'll point him to this post. It looks like the image should be [http://www.archives.gov/research/native-americans/pictures/select-list-088.html this one], but I can't locate what the title of the image actually uploaded is (it's not located [http://www.archives.gov/research/native-americans/pictures/ here], and various Google searches for "Stanley Morgan 1935" and/or "Eskimo holding gun" haven't turned anything up). [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 10:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14516 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14514 +++$+++ 14515 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 10:16:00 +++$+++ 1.311786960E09 +++$+++ Oops, note that this is also being handled at Commons [[:commons:User_talk:Dmcdevit#Wrong images|here]]  +++$+++ ::Oops, note that this is also being handled at Commons [[:commons:User_talk:Dmcdevit#Wrong images|here]] [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 10:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

276659 +++$+++ Douglas Anders +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-20 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.158795000E09 +++$+++ Nice job on trimming down the list of buildings. I thought the list almost unusable, but I never would have done a good job of paring it down. Some of those choices must have been tough. I'll admit, I'm a little bummed that the link to my first article (Weltzheimer House) was swept off of the main page, but I can't claim it was a major work.  +++$+++ Nice job on trimming down the list of buildings. I thought the list almost unusable, but I never would have done a good job of paring it down. Some of those choices must have been tough. I'll admit, I'm a little bummed that the link to my first article (Weltzheimer House) was swept off of the main page, but I can't claim it was a major work. [[User:Douglas Anders|Douglas Anders]] 16:30, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
276660 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276659 +++$+++ 276659 +++$+++ 2006-09-20 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.158795480E09 +++$+++ Thanks! And sorry, heh. There were some tough choices, as I was trying to cover not just the works he's best known for but types of works and all with a slight bias toward created articles. I claim expertise in that my dad is a big Wright fan since the 1950s and has many of his books, and I've visited quite a few of the buildings! Anyway, I'm planning to give the article a touch-up. This should at least be a [[WP:GA|Good Article]]. Getting the list out of there is just the first step... -- +++$+++ :Thanks! And sorry, heh. There were some tough choices, as I was trying to cover not just the works he's best known for but types of works and all with a slight bias toward created articles. I claim expertise in that my dad is a big Wright fan since the 1950s and has many of his books, and I've visited quite a few of the buildings! Anyway, I'm planning to give the article a touch-up. This should at least be a [[WP:GA|Good Article]]. Getting the list out of there is just the first step... --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 16:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

14517 +++$+++ JustSomePics +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311804600E09 +++$+++ [[File:Savannah (light CL42). Starboard bow, 02-08-1938 - NARA - 513030.tif|thumb]]  Misidentified ship, clearly not a light cruiser, but a heavy 8 inch cruiser.  There will be a few more in the NARA upload, I bet.  Should it be moved to a different name, or do we stick to NARA label?  +++$+++ [[File:Savannah (light CL42). Starboard bow, 02-08-1938 - NARA - 513030.tif|thumb]]  Misidentified ship, clearly not a light cruiser, but a heavy 8 inch cruiser.  There will be a few more in the NARA upload, I bet.  Should it be moved to a different name, or do we stick to NARA label? [[User:JustSomePics|JustSomePics]] ([[User talk:JustSomePics|talk]]) 15:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14518 +++$+++ Parsecboy +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14517 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311804780E09 +++$+++ Ed - I've asked a similar question [[Wikipedia_talk:GLAM\/NARA#Error_reporting|here]].  +++$+++ :::Ed - I've asked a similar question [[Wikipedia_talk:GLAM/NARA#Error_reporting|here]]. [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] ([[User talk:Parsecboy|talk]]) 15:13, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14519 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14517 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311805140E09 +++$+++ Yup, I already found that and [[User talk:Dominic#FYI|let Dominic know]]. :-) I'm in email contact with Dom, and hopefully we'll get one set up soon.  +++$+++ ::::Yup, I already found that and [[User talk:Dominic#FYI|let Dominic know]]. :-) I'm in email contact with Dom, and hopefully we'll get one set up soon. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 15:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14520 +++$+++ JustSomePics +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14517 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.311806160E09 +++$+++ Great, thanks.  Congratulations and thanks to all for uploading this great set of images.  +++$+++ :::::Great, thanks.  Congratulations and thanks to all for uploading this great set of images. [[User:JustSomePics|JustSomePics]] ([[User talk:JustSomePics|talk]]) 15:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14521 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14517 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311806340E09 +++$+++ There's something like 123,000 in all, so I'm hoping more ship images are forthcoming!  +++$+++ ::::::There's something like 123,000 in all, so I'm hoping more ship images are forthcoming! [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 15:39, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

538807 +++$+++ PajaBG +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-02 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.149265140E09 +++$+++ Hello. Can you check the [[List of Belgrade neighborhoods]] and tell me how can I make the horizontal list, but with small squares (like ones you get when you type *) instead of numbers? Or some better way of sorting it (in this case I think vertical list would be way too long to be either effective or nice looking)  +++$+++ Hello. Can you check the [[List of Belgrade neighborhoods]] and tell me how can I make the horizontal list, but with small squares (like ones you get when you type *) instead of numbers? Or some better way of sorting it (in this case I think vertical list would be way too long to be either effective or nice looking) [[User:PajaBG|PajaBG]] 09:19, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
538808 +++$+++ PajaBG +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538807 +++$+++ 538807 +++$+++ 2006-06-02 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.149314100E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I re-arranged the list. Hope it looks better now  +++$+++ :Thanks. I re-arranged the list. Hope it looks better now [[User:PajaBG|PajaBG]] 22:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

276665 +++$+++ Wmahan +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276665 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-28 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.159446060E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for keeping me updated on the lyrics2search links. I was wondering, though, does it really qualify as spam? A brief look through the site didn't turn up any ads, and in my experience spam links are almost always added to increase ad revenue. Any idea why someone would add so many links to a site with no ads, and do you think it's worth removing all of it?  +++$+++ Hi, thanks for keeping me updated on the lyrics2search links. I was wondering, though, does it really qualify as spam? A brief look through the site didn't turn up any ads, and in my experience spam links are almost always added to increase ad revenue. Any idea why someone would add so many links to a site with no ads, and do you think it's worth removing all of it? [[User:Wmahan|Wmahan]][[User talk:Wmahan|.]] 05:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
276666 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276665 +++$+++ 276665 +++$+++ 2006-09-28 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.159447260E09 +++$+++ Hm, I hadn't given it that close a look, to be honest. I know that there are copyright paranoids who would rather we not link to copyright violations, and I know there are [[WP:EL]] exclusionists. My concern is that it's an open door to other self-promotional\/vanity linking even if it isn't a money maker. Note the reception given [[Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion\/Wikilyrics|wikilyrics]]. -- +++$+++ :Hm, I hadn't given it that close a look, to be honest. I know that there are copyright paranoids who would rather we not link to copyright violations, and I know there are [[WP:EL]] exclusionists. My concern is that it's an open door to other self-promotional/vanity linking even if it isn't a money maker. Note the reception given [[Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Wikilyrics|wikilyrics]]. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 05:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

14522 +++$+++ Dream out loud +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14522 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311808440E09 +++$+++ Can you explain why you reverted all my edits to [[Point Park Civic Center]]?  I know its Today's Featured Article, but there are parts of it that are missing citations and there are [[WP:WEASEL|weasel words]] in the lead section (that aren't elaborated upon in the prose).  I don't think we should treat it any differently than a regular article just because it's on the main page.  I wasn't trying to \"tag bomb\" it;  I was simply trying notify other editors that there are issues that should be taken care of, seeing how it is Today's Featured Article.  Also, you removed my tags, but not that tags left there by other editors, which does not make any sense. \u2013 +++$+++ Can you explain why you reverted all my edits to [[Point Park Civic Center]]?  I know its Today's Featured Article, but there are parts of it that are missing citations and there are [[WP:WEASEL|weasel words]] in the lead section (that aren't elaborated upon in the prose).  I don't think we should treat it any differently than a regular article just because it's on the main page.  I wasn't trying to "tag bomb" it;  I was simply trying notify other editors that there are issues that should be taken care of, seeing how it is Today's Featured Article.  Also, you removed my tags, but not that tags left there by other editors, which does not make any sense. –[[User:Dream out loud|<span style="font-variant: small-caps">Dream&nbsp;out&nbsp;loud</span>]]&nbsp;<small>([[User talk:Dream out loud|talk]])</small> 16:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14523 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14522 +++$+++ 14522 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311810360E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your dedication, but you don't tagbomb a TFA for the same reason you can't AFD a TFA &ndash; it doesn't look good to our readers. You don't purposely dirty the welcome mat you put out for visitors, do you? :-)  +++$+++ :Thank you for your dedication, but you don't tagbomb a TFA for the same reason you can't AFD a TFA &ndash; it doesn't look good to our readers. You don't purposely dirty the welcome mat you put out for visitors, do you? :-) [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 16:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14524 +++$+++ Dream out loud +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14522 +++$+++ 14523 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311811800E09 +++$+++ No, that wasn't my intention.  I was simply adding to the tags that were already present because the article has issues which need to be fixed.  There's no reason to treat it differently than any other article.  You can't compare tagging an article to and AFD, those are two completely different things.  If you feel the need to remove the tags I added, why don't you go ahead and just remove all the tags in the article while you're at it.  No reason to just take out mine.  Let's just make everyone think there are no issues with this article at all, so when it's no longer a TFA, it will sit in the same condition.  Or do you want to redecorate it with tags tomorrow?  The point, this article needs work, and there is a no better time than right now to take care of it, but removing the tags is only counterproductive.  \u2013 +++$+++ ::No, that wasn't my intention.  I was simply adding to the tags that were already present because the article has issues which need to be fixed.  There's no reason to treat it differently than any other article.  You can't compare tagging an article to and AFD, those are two completely different things.  If you feel the need to remove the tags I added, why don't you go ahead and just remove all the tags in the article while you're at it.  No reason to just take out mine.  Let's just make everyone think there are no issues with this article at all, so when it's no longer a TFA, it will sit in the same condition.  Or do you want to redecorate it with tags tomorrow?  The point, this article needs work, and there is a no better time than right now to take care of it, but removing the tags is only counterproductive.  –[[User:Dream out loud|<span style="font-variant: small-caps">Dream&nbsp;out&nbsp;loud</span>]]&nbsp;<small>([[User talk:Dream out loud|talk]])</small> 17:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14525 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14522 +++$+++ 14524 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.311813180E09 +++$+++ Yes, there actually is a reason: \"You don't purposely dirty the welcome mat you put out for visitors, do you?\" And yes, I'd much rather put the tags on tomorrow, but most preferably I'd wait until it's entirely off the main page (four days) and FAR it. The problem here is that the article should not have been selected for TFA in this state, but now that is has been, I'm not going to decorate the top article on one of the world's top websites with tags.  +++$+++ :::Yes, there actually is a reason: "You don't purposely dirty the welcome mat you put out for visitors, do you?" And yes, I'd much rather put the tags on tomorrow, but most preferably I'd wait until it's entirely off the main page (four days) and FAR it. The problem here is that the article should not have been selected for TFA in this state, but now that is has been, I'm not going to decorate the top article on one of the world's top websites with tags. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 17:33, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14526 +++$+++ Peter cohen +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14522 +++$+++ 14525 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311831240E09 +++$+++ Well said.-- +++$+++ ::::Well said.--[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 22:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14527 +++$+++ Dream out loud +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14522 +++$+++ 14526 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311833100E09 +++$+++ I agree the article should not have been selected for TFA.  But you still didn't respond to the statement I made twice already.  I want to know why you only felt the need to remove ''my'' tags, but not the ones added there only a few hours beforehand by other editors. \u2013 +++$+++ :::::I agree the article should not have been selected for TFA.  But you still didn't respond to the statement I made twice already.  I want to know why you only felt the need to remove ''my'' tags, but not the ones added there only a few hours beforehand by other editors. –[[User:Dream out loud|<span style="font-variant: small-caps">Dream&nbsp;out&nbsp;loud</span>]]&nbsp;<small>([[User talk:Dream out loud|talk]])</small> 23:05, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14528 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14522 +++$+++ 14527 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.311861420E09 +++$+++ <s>The other tags?<\/s> I didn't see them at the time, my bad.  +++$+++ ::::::<s>The other tags?</s> I didn't see them at the time, my bad. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 06:57, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

550413 +++$+++ Quale +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-14 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.121389980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking the time to find some references to support keeping this article.  I will take a look at them.  I'm probably going to wait a day or two more to see what other VfD voters think before placing my vote, but I'm leaning toward \"keep\" with rename to plate glass.  (The \"glass plate\" vs \"plate glass\" issue was brought up by someone on the article's talk page some months ago, but no one responded.)  +++$+++ Thanks for taking the time to find some references to support keeping this article.  I will take a look at them.  I'm probably going to wait a day or two more to see what other VfD voters think before placing my vote, but I'm leaning toward "keep" with rename to plate glass.  (The "glass plate" vs "plate glass" issue was brought up by someone on the article's talk page some months ago, but no one responded.) [[User:Quale|Quale]] 18:13, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
550414 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550413 +++$+++ 550413 +++$+++ 2005-07-14 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.121390580E09 +++$+++ Ok. Yeah, I saw that talk-page comment. Renaming seems the thing to do though I think I've heard that terminology even less often than the still-obscure \"glass plate\".- +++$+++ :Ok. Yeah, I saw that talk-page comment. Renaming seems the thing to do though I think I've heard that terminology even less often than the still-obscure "glass plate".-[[User:Splash|Splash]] 18:23, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

276669 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks Miamitom 13:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ Thanks Miamitom 13:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
276670 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276669 +++$+++ 276669 +++$+++ 2006-09-30 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.159612860E09 +++$+++ I am confident that I have removed the section per Wikipedia policy. I have argued that the content is a) unencyclopedic (not notable), b) unverifiable (no citations to third parties), and solely constitutes your personal observations. If they were neutral and to the point, they could stay. I do not believe the section is neutral. -- +++$+++ :I am confident that I have removed the section per Wikipedia policy. I have argued that the content is a) unencyclopedic (not notable), b) unverifiable (no citations to third parties), and solely constitutes your personal observations. If they were neutral and to the point, they could stay. I do not believe the section is neutral. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 03:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

538814 +++$+++ PajaBG +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538814 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-08 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.149800700E09 +++$+++ Hello. Here it is...finally :o) [[Dragovishtitsa]] Take care  +++$+++ Hello. Here it is...finally :o) [[Dragovishtitsa]] Take care [[User:PajaBG|PajaBG]] 14:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
538815 +++$+++ PajaBG +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538814 +++$+++ 538814 +++$+++ 2006-06-08 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.149805980E09 +++$+++ Well, a very small portion of the Dragovistica's watershed is in Maceodnia. The source of the Brankovacka reka, its tributary, is on the border of Serbia and Macedonia, and a small area (not more than few square kilometers) of its drainage area is within Macedonia. So I thought it should be noted. However, my map is detailed but old, and it is possible that after corrections of the border in the 1990's, the borderline leaves all of it within Serbia (which, if you look at the map, would be natural). But if you think it is not important, it can be omitted  +++$+++ : Well, a very small portion of the Dragovistica's watershed is in Maceodnia. The source of the Brankovacka reka, its tributary, is on the border of Serbia and Macedonia, and a small area (not more than few square kilometers) of its drainage area is within Macedonia. So I thought it should be noted. However, my map is detailed but old, and it is possible that after corrections of the border in the 1990's, the borderline leaves all of it within Serbia (which, if you look at the map, would be natural). But if you think it is not important, it can be omitted [[User:PajaBG|PajaBG]] 15:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

276671 +++$+++ MacRusgail +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-01 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.159742820E09 +++$+++ ... is never, if ever, referred to as \"Alexander Bean\". If you said this to most Scots you would get a blank expression, though many have heard of \"Sawney Bean\". I suspect he may be termed \"Alexander\" somewhere, but Sawney Bean would be the name people would look for commonly, therefore, it isn't really appropriate as a title. -- +++$+++ ... is never, if ever, referred to as "Alexander Bean". If you said this to most Scots you would get a blank expression, though many have heard of "Sawney Bean". I suspect he may be termed "Alexander" somewhere, but Sawney Bean would be the name people would look for commonly, therefore, it isn't really appropriate as a title. --[[User:MacRusgail|MacRusgail]] 15:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
276672 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 2006-10-01 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.159768800E09 +++$+++ Never is wrong, as three of our external links (all from .co.uk domains) call him ''Alexander \"Sawney\" Bean''. That said, the article name should be the most commonly used in English, thus ''Sawney Bean''. -- +++$+++ :Never is wrong, as three of our external links (all from .co.uk domains) call him ''Alexander "Sawney" Bean''. That said, the article name should be the most commonly used in English, thus ''Sawney Bean''. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 23:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
276673 +++$+++ MacRusgail +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 276672 +++$+++ 2006-10-02 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.159809660E09 +++$+++ And there are people who have talked about \"Charles Marks\" (he did end up dying in an English speaking town, I suppose),  but Alexander Bean is an extremely uncommon form, possibly a backformation and almost certainly a gentrification, since it has been suggested that Sawney in this case may not be from \"Alexander\", but a corruption of something else. He is a legendary figure so his background information is often dubious. In Scotland we tend to use diminutives more than south of the Border, due to the influence of both of our languages, and they don't always have the same kind of connotations.  -- +++$+++ ::And there are people who have talked about "Charles Marks" (he did end up dying in an English speaking town, I suppose),  but Alexander Bean is an extremely uncommon form, possibly a backformation and almost certainly a gentrification, since it has been suggested that Sawney in this case may not be from "Alexander", but a corruption of something else. He is a legendary figure so his background information is often dubious. In Scotland we tend to use diminutives more than south of the Border, due to the influence of both of our languages, and they don't always have the same kind of connotations.  --[[User:MacRusgail|MacRusgail]] 10:21, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
276674 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 276673 +++$+++ 2006-10-02 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.159810200E09 +++$+++ Just to be clear, I don't object to the article title being simpler. But the name Alexander is used in some of our sources, whether it's culturally likely or not. Anyway, wasn't the first story about him in an English newspaper? -- +++$+++ :::Just to be clear, I don't object to the article title being simpler. But the name Alexander is used in some of our sources, whether it's culturally likely or not. Anyway, wasn't the first story about him in an English newspaper? --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 10:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
276675 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 2006-10-02 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.159839420E09 +++$+++ E! Online is a reputable news source, as is the article on Murphy's site where he admits to an altercation. Seriously, anybody following Tarantino's career in the 90s heard about this even if they had no idea who Murphy was. He can't just sweep it under the rug. -- +++$+++ :E! Online is a reputable news source, as is the article on Murphy's site where he admits to an altercation. Seriously, anybody following Tarantino's career in the 90s heard about this even if they had no idea who Murphy was. He can't just sweep it under the rug. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 18:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
276676 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 2006-10-02 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.159851480E09 +++$+++ You're hilarious, you know that? I think you're way wrapped up in somebody else's decade-old Hollywood drama. Keep in mind this edit history: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Don_Murphy&diff=prev&oldid=73767996 delete the story here], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Jane_Hamsher&diff=prev&oldid=74562671 add the story here]. That's basically prima facie evidence of POV-pushing. -- +++$+++ :You're hilarious, you know that? I think you're way wrapped up in somebody else's decade-old Hollywood drama. Keep in mind this edit history: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Don_Murphy&diff=prev&oldid=73767996 delete the story here], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jane_Hamsher&diff=prev&oldid=74562671 add the story here]. That's basically prima facie evidence of POV-pushing. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 21:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
276677 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 2006-10-03 08:58:00 +++$+++ 1.159891080E09 +++$+++ It is you who do not understand policy, it is you who wishes to apply policy selectively, it is you who are throwing around insults, and it is you who are trying to eliminate cited material -- which has appeared in other major media and books, even. There was a lawsuit. The \"subject\" has not said what is inaccurate nor supplied information to correct it. He doesn't get a veto over [[WP:V|verifiable]] material. Certainly not by a vague comment on a message board. Go ahead; escalate this situation if you feel this strongly about it, and we'll see who's right. I would rather cooperate with you to create a fuller article, but you've chosen this molehill on which to make a stand. (And you're taking sides between two people who don't seem to have had a falling out. What's up with that?) -- +++$+++ :It is you who do not understand policy, it is you who wishes to apply policy selectively, it is you who are throwing around insults, and it is you who are trying to eliminate cited material -- which has appeared in other major media and books, even. There was a lawsuit. The "subject" has not said what is inaccurate nor supplied information to correct it. He doesn't get a veto over [[WP:V|verifiable]] material. Certainly not by a vague comment on a message board. Go ahead; escalate this situation if you feel this strongly about it, and we'll see who's right. I would rather cooperate with you to create a fuller article, but you've chosen this molehill on which to make a stand. (And you're taking sides between two people who don't seem to have had a falling out. What's up with that?) --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 08:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
276678 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 2006-10-03 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.159915560E09 +++$+++ Talk pages are where people discuss policy, friend. If we all magically agreed with one another we wouldn't need Talk pages at all. As for the case, I write what the sources say. Now, obviously you seem to have some personal insider knowledge about their falling out, and I recommend that you consider whether that is biasing your editing here. Please try to stay focused on making a better encyclopedia instead of defending your friend and trashing your friend's former friend. -- +++$+++ :Talk pages are where people discuss policy, friend. If we all magically agreed with one another we wouldn't need Talk pages at all. As for the case, I write what the sources say. Now, obviously you seem to have some personal insider knowledge about their falling out, and I recommend that you consider whether that is biasing your editing here. Please try to stay focused on making a better encyclopedia instead of defending your friend and trashing your friend's former friend. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 15:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
276679 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 2006-10-03 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.159922040E09 +++$+++ What, I'm supposed to read somebody's message board to keep an article up to date? I don't think so, I have neither the interest nor the time. If there is a [[WP:V|verifiable]] [[WP:RS|reliable source]] that we can [[WP:CITE|cite]] in-article about the lawsuit's outcome, of course we should include it (I seriously do not care whether he won, lost, settled, or appealed the Supreme Court, nor am I moved by reports that he's \"laughing\" -- I would hope the man actually has a life). From what you say, Murphy seems to have a problem with E! Online. I suggest that he contact E! Online to handle that. If they have an inaccurate account of the lawsuit, how is that our fault? Or mine? -- +++$+++ :What, I'm supposed to read somebody's message board to keep an article up to date? I don't think so, I have neither the interest nor the time. If there is a [[WP:V|verifiable]] [[WP:RS|reliable source]] that we can [[WP:CITE|cite]] in-article about the lawsuit's outcome, of course we should include it (I seriously do not care whether he won, lost, settled, or appealed the Supreme Court, nor am I moved by reports that he's "laughing" -- I would hope the man actually has a life). From what you say, Murphy seems to have a problem with E! Online. I suggest that he contact E! Online to handle that. If they have an inaccurate account of the lawsuit, how is that our fault? Or mine? --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 17:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
276680 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 276679 +++$+++ 2006-10-03 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.159926060E09 +++$+++ I have no dog in this fight, but I would recommend that the material from E! Online not be presented without some phrase like \"according to E! Online\". It's not enough to just put an inline cite; that looks like we're saying \"this is the truth and here's the proof\", not \"this is what so-and-so says\". This is the kind of thing that makes Jimbo nervous, and I can't blame him. -- +++$+++ ::I have no dog in this fight, but I would recommend that the material from E! Online not be presented without some phrase like "according to E! Online". It's not enough to just put an inline cite; that looks like we're saying "this is the truth and here's the proof", not "this is what so-and-so says". This is the kind of thing that makes Jimbo nervous, and I can't blame him. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 18:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
276681 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276671 +++$+++ 276680 +++$+++ 2006-10-03 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.159927800E09 +++$+++ That's a fine suggestion, Trovatore. (By the way, I have already tried to soften the language; this was originally [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Don_Murphy&diff=73441423&oldid=73298947 added by Evan1975].) If ColScott were making constructive suggestions such as yours we might have made more progress sooner. -- +++$+++ :::That's a fine suggestion, Trovatore. (By the way, I have already tried to soften the language; this was originally [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Don_Murphy&diff=73441423&oldid=73298947 added by Evan1975].) If ColScott were making constructive suggestions such as yours we might have made more progress sooner. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 19:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

46112 +++$+++ Nohomers48 +++$+++ SuperTank17 +++$+++ 46112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-20 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.261381980E09 +++$+++ The [[Military of Cape Verde]] page has it listed that they did.  +++$+++ The [[Military of Cape Verde]] page has it listed that they did. [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] ([[User talk:Nohomers48|talk]]) 23:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
46113 +++$+++ Nohomers48 +++$+++ SuperTank17 +++$+++ 46112 +++$+++ 46112 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.261460400E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Military_of_Cape_Verde&direction=prev&oldid=312610950 This is the revision in question].  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_of_Cape_Verde&direction=prev&oldid=312610950 This is the revision in question]. [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] ([[User talk:Nohomers48|talk]]) 21:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
46114 +++$+++ Nohomers48 +++$+++ SuperTank17 +++$+++ 46112 +++$+++ 46113 +++$+++ 2009-12-22 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.261479420E09 +++$+++ Indeed so. Considering that Cape Verde became independent in 1975 it's entirely possible that they were given T-55s, as Russia had enough of them to give away at that time.  +++$+++ ::Indeed so. Considering that Cape Verde became independent in 1975 it's entirely possible that they were given T-55s, as Russia had enough of them to give away at that time. [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] ([[User talk:Nohomers48|talk]]) 02:57, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

538819 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-14 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.150323420E09 +++$+++ Realy, a federation bwetween Bulgaria and Mongolia will be more real than the one you indoctrinated. Bulgarians and Macedonians are not one people, the map on your user page ofends Macedonia, so it ofends and your land as it tells unreal things-- +++$+++ Realy, a federation bwetween Bulgaria and Mongolia will be more real than the one you indoctrinated. Bulgarians and Macedonians are not one people, the map on your user page ofends Macedonia, so it ofends and your land as it tells unreal things--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 15:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538820 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.150317060E09 +++$+++ It begs the question: who has been indoctrinated? Let's look at a few facts (i.e. ethnolinguistic maps): [http:\/\/img67.exs.cx\/img67\/8450\/MapbyAmiBoue1847.jpg] [http:\/\/img56.exs.cx\/img56\/5857\/VolkerkartevonMittel-undSudosteuropa.jpg] [http:\/\/img56.exs.cx\/img56\/3069\/slaveni-karta.jpg] [http:\/\/img57.exs.cx\/img57\/1241\/ResizeofEuropavolkerundsprachenkarte.jpg] [http:\/\/img57.exs.cx\/img57\/8127\/1880-geoturkeyethnographical.jpg] [http:\/\/www.lib.utexas.edu\/maps\/historical\/shepherd\/races_balkan_shepherd_1923.jpg] [http:\/\/www.cjcr.cam.ac.uk\/gateway\/maps\/Ethnic16.gif] [http:\/\/mitglied.lycos.de\/anakin77\/Sprachkarten\/eth2.jpg] [http:\/\/img296.imageshack.us\/img296\/7540\/makedonienlandschaftsundkultur.jpg]. This confirms [[Krste Misirkov]]'s words: ''We are Bulgarian more than the Bulgarians in Bulgaria. The population of Skopje is pure Bulgarian.'' -- +++$+++ :It begs the question: who has been indoctrinated? Let's look at a few facts (i.e. ethnolinguistic maps): [http://img67.exs.cx/img67/8450/MapbyAmiBoue1847.jpg] [http://img56.exs.cx/img56/5857/VolkerkartevonMittel-undSudosteuropa.jpg] [http://img56.exs.cx/img56/3069/slaveni-karta.jpg] [http://img57.exs.cx/img57/1241/ResizeofEuropavolkerundsprachenkarte.jpg] [http://img57.exs.cx/img57/8127/1880-geoturkeyethnographical.jpg] [http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/shepherd/races_balkan_shepherd_1923.jpg] [http://www.cjcr.cam.ac.uk/gateway/maps/Ethnic16.gif] [http://mitglied.lycos.de/anakin77/Sprachkarten/eth2.jpg] [http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/7540/makedonienlandschaftsundkultur.jpg]. This confirms [[Krste Misirkov]]'s words: ''We are Bulgarian more than the Bulgarians in Bulgaria. The population of Skopje is pure Bulgarian.'' --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 13:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538821 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.150317240E09 +++$+++ Another interesting question is how [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Blagoevgrad_Province&diff=58396972&oldid=58304290 deep] has your indoctrination sunk. -- +++$+++ :Another interesting question is how [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blagoevgrad_Province&diff=58396972&oldid=58304290 deep] has your indoctrination sunk. --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 13:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538822 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538821 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.150324200E09 +++$+++ Todor, can you look [http:\/\/mk.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=%D0%91%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0&diff=52854&oldid=52640 here] and address the problem?  +++$+++ ::Todor, can you look [http://mk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%91%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0&diff=52854&oldid=52640 here] and address the problem? [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 15:30, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538823 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538822 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.150332720E09 +++$+++ Ah, bla, bla, bla. Todor your dictionary is realy expresive, I like it, politics and sex, \"The human self-determination right\" in Bulgaria. But I'm here and see that there are more than milion Romani and Turks, I have lots of relatives in Blagoevgrad province (all Macedonian, they stay quite cose no one is there to organise them, ironicly are represed and cant get up their head of problems, peacefull people). And your data shows something silly, The map on mine userpage is what I believe and the Macedonian people to, You can continue to lie your self trought internet \"bubling\", please come to macedonia and feel the diference. And honestly a federation between Macedonia and \"RoB\" never will be. Telex do you do somethin else in the free time? The maps are just part of \"your\" indoctrination. When did they comed out, after Greece and Bulgaria got indepence from Otomania. I can drow thousnads showing the oposite and aftre 100 years to be viewed like this ones.-- +++$+++ :::Ah, bla, bla, bla. Todor your dictionary is realy expresive, I like it, politics and sex, "The human self-determination right" in Bulgaria. But I'm here and see that there are more than milion Romani and Turks, I have lots of relatives in Blagoevgrad province (all Macedonian, they stay quite cose no one is there to organise them, ironicly are represed and cant get up their head of problems, peacefull people). And your data shows something silly, The map on mine userpage is what I believe and the Macedonian people to, You can continue to lie your self trought internet "bubling", please come to macedonia and feel the diference. And honestly a federation between Macedonia and "RoB" never will be. Telex do you do somethin else in the free time? The maps are just part of "your" indoctrination. When did they comed out, after Greece and Bulgaria got indepence from Otomania. I can drow thousnads showing the oposite and aftre 100 years to be viewed like this ones.--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 17:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538824 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538822 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.150333020E09 +++$+++ And do not confuse free expresion with self-determination.-- +++$+++ :::And do not confuse free expresion with self-determination.--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 17:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538825 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538824 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.150326180E09 +++$+++ Most of those maps are in the (scientific) [[German language]], and came out before the Balkan Wars. [http:\/\/img57.exs.cx\/img57\/8127\/1880-geoturkeyethnographical.jpg This one] which quite clearly includes present-day FYROM as Bulgarian-populated, was published in 1880. -- +++$+++ ::::Most of those maps are in the (scientific) [[German language]], and came out before the Balkan Wars. [http://img57.exs.cx/img57/8127/1880-geoturkeyethnographical.jpg This one] which quite clearly includes present-day FYROM as Bulgarian-populated, was published in 1880. --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 16:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538826 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538825 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.150326780E09 +++$+++ Bubling, lol. It's the second time you've used this word. So let me bubble something to you my fellow Vlatko, student in one of the largest ''tatar schools'' Bulgaria has to offer. Use a dictionary, it will raise your credibility level and people will take you more seriously. And drop that en-3.  +++$+++ :::::Bubling, lol. It's the second time you've used this word. So let me bubble something to you my fellow Vlatko, student in one of the largest ''tatar schools'' Bulgaria has to offer. Use a dictionary, it will raise your credibility level and people will take you more seriously. And drop that en-3. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 16:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538827 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538824 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.150326840E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:TodorBozhinov&action=edit&section=8 This one] is from 1847! -- +++$+++ ::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TodorBozhinov&action=edit&section=8 This one] is from 1847! --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 16:14, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538828 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538824 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.150327020E09 +++$+++ Also, why to the \"[[Macedonians (ethnic group)|Macedonians]]\", who descend from the [[Kumans]] (from [[Kumanovo]] - that's where [[User:Pulvis angelus]] is from) and other Turko-Mongolic tribes, call the [[Bulgarians]] \"[[Tatars]]\"? According to [[Ethnologue]], there are only 6,000 [[Crimean Tatars in Bulgaria|Tatars in Bulgaria]] [http:\/\/www.ethnologue.com\/show_country.asp?name=Bulgaria]. -- +++$+++ ::::Also, why to the "[[Macedonians (ethnic group)|Macedonians]]", who descend from the [[Kumans]] (from [[Kumanovo]] - that's where [[User:Pulvis angelus]] is from) and other Turko-Mongolic tribes, call the [[Bulgarians]] "[[Tatars]]"? According to [[Ethnologue]], there are only 6,000 [[Crimean Tatars in Bulgaria|Tatars in Bulgaria]] [http://www.ethnologue.com/show_country.asp?name=Bulgaria]. --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 16:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538829 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538828 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.150327440E09 +++$+++ That's nothing compared to Khan [[Kuber]], a relative of [[Asparukh]] settling with his people in the present day republic. Thats why, Republicans are as much tatars as the Bulgarians, and thats why the Bulgarians are descendants of Ancient Macedonians as much as the Republicans are.  +++$+++ :::::That's nothing compared to Khan [[Kuber]], a relative of [[Asparukh]] settling with his people in the present day republic. Thats why, Republicans are as much tatars as the Bulgarians, and thats why the Bulgarians are descendants of Ancient Macedonians as much as the Republicans are. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 16:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538830 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538829 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.150327500E09 +++$+++ I must say though, it's pretty rich coming from Kumanovo and writing [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Pulvis_angelus&oldid=56554686 this] ;-) -- +++$+++ ::::::I must say though, it's pretty rich coming from Kumanovo and writing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Pulvis_angelus&oldid=56554686 this] ;-) --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 16:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538831 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538830 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.150327560E09 +++$+++ I bears some deep form of self-irony, or blatant misunderstanding of history.  +++$+++ :::::::I bears some deep form of self-irony, or blatant misunderstanding of history. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 16:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538832 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538831 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.150327860E09 +++$+++ I sometimes wonder - why don't they try claiming Asparukh as a Macedonian Khan? -- +++$+++ ::::::::I sometimes wonder - why don't they try claiming Asparukh as a Macedonian Khan? --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 16:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538833 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538832 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.150327980E09 +++$+++ For the same reason they do not count the Russo-Turkish war as liberation war - it did not lead to the independent country Macedonian historians have always tried to find in their history.  +++$+++ :::::::::For the same reason they do not count the Russo-Turkish war as liberation war - it did not lead to the independent country Macedonian historians have always tried to find in their history. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 16:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538834 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538833 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.150328160E09 +++$+++ So, let's see what they've stolen: [[Samuil of Bulgaria|Tzar Samuil]], [[Prince Marko]], [[Alexander the Great]], [[Skanderbeg]] (the the revision history of the article in question). Soon, they'll be claiming [[Suleiman the Magnificent]]! -- +++$+++ ::::::::::So, let's see what they've stolen: [[Samuil of Bulgaria|Tzar Samuil]], [[Prince Marko]], [[Alexander the Great]], [[Skanderbeg]] (the the revision history of the article in question). Soon, they'll be claiming [[Suleiman the Magnificent]]! --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 16:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538835 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538834 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.150328340E09 +++$+++ They've sort of done it already, look at the [http:\/\/mk.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%D0%98%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BE%D1%82_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4 template] on the right.  +++$+++ :::::::::::They've sort of done it already, look at the [http://mk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BE%D1%82_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4 template] on the right. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 16:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538836 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538819 +++$+++ 538835 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.150328520E09 +++$+++ I see... So is he (a Turk) also part of Makedonskiat Narod? We are making progress ;-) -- +++$+++ ::::::::::::I see... So is he (a Turk) also part of Makedonskiat Narod? We are making progress ;-) --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 16:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

14532 +++$+++ PMG +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14532 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311962880E09 +++$+++ So it was Tosa or Kaga class?  +++$+++ So it was Tosa or Kaga class? [[User:PMG|PMG]] ([[User talk:PMG|talk]]) 11:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
14533 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14532 +++$+++ 14532 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311996360E09 +++$+++ It should be the Tosa class, but there may be variance in a few sources because ''Kaga'' was launched first.  +++$+++ :It should be the Tosa class, but there may be variance in a few sources because ''Kaga'' was launched first. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 20:26, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

14536 +++$+++ PMG +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14536 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-30 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.312077060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:PMG|PMG]] ([[User talk:PMG|talk]]) 18:51, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
14537 +++$+++ Parsecboy +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14536 +++$+++ 14536 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312077240E09 +++$+++ Because it's a direct quote from the source. You can of course rewrite it so it doesn't require an immediate attribution.  +++$+++ :Because it's a direct quote from the source. You can of course rewrite it so it doesn't require an immediate attribution. [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] ([[User talk:Parsecboy|talk]]) 18:54, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
14538 +++$+++ PMG +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14536 +++$+++ 14537 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312084020E09 +++$+++ Thank you - I rewrite article in pl.wiki.  +++$+++ ::Thank you - I rewrite article in pl.wiki. [[User:PMG|PMG]] ([[User talk:PMG|talk]]) 20:47, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

614092 +++$+++ Swood100 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-06 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.265497260E09 +++$+++ Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice -->-- +++$+++ Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice -->--[[User:Swood100|Swood100]] ([[User talk:Swood100|talk]]) 15:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
614093 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614092 +++$+++ 614092 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.265585280E09 +++$+++ Ah, so five of the arbiters seem to have declined it. Looks like a content dispute, to be settled by policies and guidelines as usual. . .  +++$+++ :Ah, so five of the arbiters seem to have declined it. Looks like a content dispute, to be settled by policies and guidelines as usual. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

276682 +++$+++ DRK +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-03 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.159935300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for enforcing [[WP:BLP]]. Contrary to what ColScott seems to say just above this comment, you do understand the policy.  +++$+++ Thanks for enforcing [[WP:BLP]]. Contrary to what ColScott seems to say just above this comment, you do understand the policy. [[User:DRK|DRK]] 21:15, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
276683 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276682 +++$+++ 276682 +++$+++ 2006-10-03 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.159938840E09 +++$+++ You're welcome, and thanks! I do my best to be reasonable. I would hope he would do the same. -- +++$+++ :You're welcome, and thanks! I do my best to be reasonable. I would hope he would do the same. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 22:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

276684 +++$+++ Uncle G +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-05 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.160088360E09 +++$+++ That was good work on [[donkey punch]].   +++$+++ That was good work on [[donkey punch]].  [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 15:46, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
276685 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276684 +++$+++ 276684 +++$+++ 2006-10-05 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.160096880E09 +++$+++ Thanks, heh. I just have this thing about rescuing bad articles, especially from the AFD axe. In this case, though, I fell short, as the article omits major parts of the topic simply because I couldn't find a [[WP:V]] source that wasn't primary or a blog. I guess I consider it an exercise ... -- +++$+++ *Thanks, heh. I just have this thing about rescuing bad articles, especially from the AFD axe. In this case, though, I fell short, as the article omits major parts of the topic simply because I couldn't find a [[WP:V]] source that wasn't primary or a blog. I guess I consider it an exercise ... --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 18:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
276686 +++$+++ Uncle G +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276684 +++$+++ 276685 +++$+++ 2006-10-05 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.160101860E09 +++$+++ Rewriting articles at AFD has a long and honourable tradition.  &#9786;   You didn't fall short.  You set a good example for others to follow in any further edits to the article.   +++$+++ **Rewriting articles at AFD has a long and honourable tradition.  &#9786;   You didn't fall short.  You set a good example for others to follow in any further edits to the article.  [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 19:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

14541 +++$+++ Lear's Fool +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 08:48:00 +++$+++ 1.312300080E09 +++$+++ Ed, can I ask you to reconsider this deletion? There was nothing in the page that could be construed as an attack, and it certainly doesn't fit the criteria at [[WP:G10]].  If you feel this userpage is inappropriate, I think an MfD would be the appropriate forum to seek deletion.&nbsp; -- ''''' +++$+++ Ed, can I ask you to reconsider this deletion? There was nothing in the page that could be construed as an attack, and it certainly doesn't fit the criteria at [[WP:G10]].  If you feel this userpage is inappropriate, I think an MfD would be the appropriate forum to seek deletion.&nbsp; -- '''''[[User:Lear's Fool|Lear's]] [[User Talk:Lear's Fool|Fool]]''''' 08:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
14542 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312308660E09 +++$+++ Indeed, hardly an attack page though it could be seen as [[WP:CIVIL|uncivil]] but deleting it as WP:G10 when it isn't and without any MfD is rather poor use of Admin tools.  +++$+++ :Indeed, hardly an attack page though it could be seen as [[WP:CIVIL|uncivil]] but deleting it as WP:G10 when it isn't and without any MfD is rather poor use of Admin tools. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 11:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
14543 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 14542 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.312310640E09 +++$+++ I do see where you two are coming from, but I respectfully disagree. From G10: \"material intended purely to harass or intimidate a person\" ; from [[WP:ATP]]: \"exists primarily to disparage or threaten its subject\" or \"... keeping a 'list of enemies' or 'list of everything bad user:XXX did' on your user space is neither constructive nor appropriate.\" Using \"attack page\" in the summary was a poor choice of words, but even if there are no explicit attacks, gathering a list of Timeshift's perceived 'enemies' violates the spirit of both pages.  +++$+++ ::I do see where you two are coming from, but I respectfully disagree. From G10: "material intended purely to harass or intimidate a person" ; from [[WP:ATP]]: "exists primarily to disparage or threaten its subject" or "... keeping a 'list of enemies' or 'list of everything bad user:XXX did' on your user space is neither constructive nor appropriate." Using "attack page" in the summary was a poor choice of words, but even if there are no explicit attacks, gathering a list of Timeshift's perceived 'enemies' violates the spirit of both pages. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 11:44, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
14544 +++$+++ Lear's Fool +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 14543 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.312317000E09 +++$+++ There was nothing in the page that threatened, disparaged or harrassed anyone; it looks more like a simple list of administrators that Surturz has had dealings with.  Orderinchaos (who was on the list) has been a vocal ''supporter'' of Timeshift through this whole affair. The G10 criterion doesn't cover this page, it should have been taken to an MfD instead.&nbsp; -- ''''' +++$+++ :::There was nothing in the page that threatened, disparaged or harrassed anyone; it looks more like a simple list of administrators that Surturz has had dealings with.  Orderinchaos (who was on the list) has been a vocal ''supporter'' of Timeshift through this whole affair. The G10 criterion doesn't cover this page, it should have been taken to an MfD instead.&nbsp; -- '''''[[User:Lear's Fool|Lear's]] [[User Talk:Lear's Fool|Fool]]''''' 13:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
14545 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 14544 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312338060E09 +++$+++ Huh? Orderinchaos was not on the page; it was Timotheus Canens, GW, and you. It was meant as a list of admins who had taken actions or made comments supportive of the deletion of his userpage.  +++$+++ ::::Huh? Orderinchaos was not on the page; it was Timotheus Canens, GW, and you. It was meant as a list of admins who had taken actions or made comments supportive of the deletion of his userpage. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 19:21, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
14546 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312319460E09 +++$+++ Spare me the crocodile tears. All the deletion does is prove that admins are using their bit to silence dissent over Shifty's userpage. The previous MfD had no consensus, yet cons for delete was claimed by the closing admin. There was no cons for the DRV yet the deletion stood. If Ed was ignorant of the [[Diogenes]] reference and construed it as an attack, perhaps he should spend more time in article space. If I start a page intended to allow non-admins to keep admins honest, how is that harmful to the project? How are non-admins meant to build consensus to recall an admin if they are not allowed to keep userpages of grievances? In deleting my subpage, The_ed17 is encouraging off-WP politicking and sock\/meatpuppetry. -- +++$+++ :Spare me the crocodile tears. All the deletion does is prove that admins are using their bit to silence dissent over Shifty's userpage. The previous MfD had no consensus, yet cons for delete was claimed by the closing admin. There was no cons for the DRV yet the deletion stood. If Ed was ignorant of the [[Diogenes]] reference and construed it as an attack, perhaps he should spend more time in article space. If I start a page intended to allow non-admins to keep admins honest, how is that harmful to the project? How are non-admins meant to build consensus to recall an admin if they are not allowed to keep userpages of grievances? In deleting my subpage, The_ed17 is encouraging off-WP politicking and sock/meatpuppetry. --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 14:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
14547 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 14546 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312338060E09 +++$+++ You're basing your entire premise on a perceived power relationship between admins and non-admins that just isn't there. If you need to 'keep an admin honest', bring it to a noticeboard. There's no need, nor benefit to the project, to keep a list around to use as a gavel. In addition, the MfD was brought to DRV, where the result was endorsed. Unfortunately for y'all, a majority in the community believes that the userpage was inappropriate, so you need to drop that stick and back away from the horse carcass.  +++$+++ ::You're basing your entire premise on a perceived power relationship between admins and non-admins that just isn't there. If you need to 'keep an admin honest', bring it to a noticeboard. There's no need, nor benefit to the project, to keep a list around to use as a gavel. In addition, the MfD was brought to DRV, where the result was endorsed. Unfortunately for y'all, a majority in the community believes that the userpage was inappropriate, so you need to drop that stick and back away from the horse carcass. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 19:21, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
14548 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 14547 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312397100E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 11:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14549 +++$+++ Nick-D +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 14548 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.312398840E09 +++$+++ That kind of page is routinely deleted when they're nominated for deletion. I opposed the deletion of Timeshift's page and voted to overturn the MfD closure in the deletion review, but it's clear to me that all the admins acted in good faith. Setting up a list of 'bad' admins is pretty unhelpful: if you really think that they violated policies you should be putting your money where your mouth is by taking this up at WP:AN or WP:ANI. All this kind of thing does is generate drama.  +++$+++ ::::That kind of page is routinely deleted when they're nominated for deletion. I opposed the deletion of Timeshift's page and voted to overturn the MfD closure in the deletion review, but it's clear to me that all the admins acted in good faith. Setting up a list of 'bad' admins is pretty unhelpful: if you really think that they violated policies you should be putting your money where your mouth is by taking this up at WP:AN or WP:ANI. All this kind of thing does is generate drama. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 12:14, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14550 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 14549 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312399200E09 +++$+++ OK, will do. -- +++$+++ :::::OK, will do. --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 12:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14551 +++$+++ Nick-D +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 14550 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.312399740E09 +++$+++ Given that the deletion was endorsed in the DRV I don't like your odds of success, but if you think that it's a productive use of your time so be it. Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Surturz\/AdminWatch&diff=prev&oldid=442835268 this], I don't think that you're familiar with the kind of scrutiny admins are under.  +++$+++ ::::::Given that the deletion was endorsed in the DRV I don't like your odds of success, but if you think that it's a productive use of your time so be it. Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Surturz/AdminWatch&diff=prev&oldid=442835268 this], I don't think that you're familiar with the kind of scrutiny admins are under. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 12:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14552 +++$+++ Avanu +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14541 +++$+++ 14551 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312407360E09 +++$+++ There is a clear difference between an actual attack page, and a page created to help someone in maintaining accountability for those in power.  [[L\xe8se majest\xe9]] is a crime that hopefully we won't see arrive at Wikipedia.  Between the extra leeway that we grant users in their own userspace, and the fact that merely recording the acts of those in power that a person finds questionable, this seems like something that would be if not exempted from the WP:ATTACK page, at least given a wide berth.  And in this specific case, I see nothing rising to the level of an actual attack aka \"disparage or threaten\".  Is there an admin that feels this is a threat?  Or do they feel disparaged?  If so, that might be something to discuss with Surturz, but as far as I can see, this page is unbelievably mild, and mainly consists of a few diffs. --  +++$+++ :::::::There is a clear difference between an actual attack page, and a page created to help someone in maintaining accountability for those in power.  [[Lèse majesté]] is a crime that hopefully we won't see arrive at Wikipedia.  Between the extra leeway that we grant users in their own userspace, and the fact that merely recording the acts of those in power that a person finds questionable, this seems like something that would be if not exempted from the WP:ATTACK page, at least given a wide berth.  And in this specific case, I see nothing rising to the level of an actual attack aka "disparage or threaten".  Is there an admin that feels this is a threat?  Or do they feel disparaged?  If so, that might be something to discuss with Surturz, but as far as I can see, this page is unbelievably mild, and mainly consists of a few diffs. -- [[User:Avanu|Avanu]] ([[User talk:Avanu|talk]]) 14:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

276688 +++$+++ ProveIt +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-23 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.161611340E09 +++$+++ I'm thinking it probably ought to be merged with ''[[:Category:Bush family]]'' ... do you agree?  -- <i> +++$+++ I'm thinking it probably ought to be merged with ''[[:Category:Bush family]]'' ... do you agree?  -- <i>[[User:ProveIt|ProveIt]] <sup>[[User talk:ProveIt|(talk)]]</sup></i> 06:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
276689 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276688 +++$+++ 276688 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.161611520E09 +++$+++ I believe all members are already in that category, so it can just be deleted. It's a unique category as far as I know (no other \"ancestors of...\" examples turn up anyway). I just don't see the point for its existence. Inherent qualities and all that. -- +++$+++ :I believe all members are already in that category, so it can just be deleted. It's a unique category as far as I know (no other "ancestors of..." examples turn up anyway). I just don't see the point for its existence. Inherent qualities and all that. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 06:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
276690 +++$+++ ProveIt +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276688 +++$+++ 276689 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.161645180E09 +++$+++ I've nominated it... I think this one will probably go through, but I've been surprised before ... -- <i> +++$+++ ::I've nominated it... I think this one will probably go through, but I've been surprised before ... -- <i>[[User:ProveIt|ProveIt]] <sup>[[User talk:ProveIt|(talk)]]</sup></i> 16:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

526712 +++$+++ Oo7565 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526712 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-28 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.177768320E09 +++$+++ I have removed the {{tl|prod}} tag from [[BowieNet]], which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial.  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] is not for controversial deletions.  For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{tl|prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]].  If you still feel the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{tl|prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]].  Thanks! <!-- [[Template:Deprod-reprod]] -->  +++$+++ I have removed the {{tl|prod}} tag from [[BowieNet]], which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial.  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] is not for controversial deletions.  For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{tl|prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]].  If you still feel the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{tl|prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]].  Thanks! <!-- [[Template:Deprod-reprod]] --> [[User:Oo7565|Oo7565]] 06:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
526713 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526712 +++$+++ 526712 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.177797240E09 +++$+++ On AFD. &mdash;  +++$+++ * On AFD. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 14:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

570403 +++$+++ MBisanz +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570403 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-17 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.213710360E09 +++$+++ I posted somewhere, but I'll post here again, {{tl|Notice}} needs conversion to the Ambox style. Cheers ''' +++$+++ I posted somewhere, but I'll post here again, {{tl|Notice}} needs conversion to the Ambox style. Cheers '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 06:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
570404 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570403 +++$+++ 570403 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.213726140E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 11:09, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

276692 +++$+++ Sa.vakilian +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-03 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.162585440E09 +++$+++ Hi, I edited this article and tried to wikify. Also I add some facts and references. I hope you agree with this changes.-- +++$+++ Hi, I edited this article and tried to wikify. Also I add some facts and references. I hope you agree with this changes.--[[User:Sa.vakilian|Sa.vakilian]] 12:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
276693 +++$+++ Sa.vakilian +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276692 +++$+++ 276692 +++$+++ 2006-11-04 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.162661820E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately some of the documents about this event are in [[Persian]]. I put some of them in [[Talk:Iran hostage crisis]]. I believe this article can't be NPOV and complete unless we use persian documents too.-- +++$+++ :Unfortunately some of the documents about this event are in [[Persian]]. I put some of them in [[Talk:Iran hostage crisis]]. I believe this article can't be NPOV and complete unless we use persian documents too.--[[User:Sa.vakilian|Sa.vakilian]] 09:37, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

614094 +++$+++ Jprw +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614094 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-08 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.265640720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help. Will try to implement your recommendations.  +++$+++ Thanks for your help. Will try to implement your recommendations. [[User:Jprw|Jprw]] ([[User talk:Jprw|talk]]) 06:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
614095 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614094 +++$+++ 614094 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.265664960E09 +++$+++ Glad to assist. For an example of the harvnb template in use see [[Second voyage of HMS Beagle]], where clicking on a citation link in the text takes you to the author name, year and page numbers in the Notes. Clicking on the author name\/year links down to the source in the References section. .  +++$+++ :Glad to assist. For an example of the harvnb template in use see [[Second voyage of HMS Beagle]], where clicking on a citation link in the text takes you to the author name, year and page numbers in the Notes. Clicking on the author name/year links down to the source in the References section. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 13:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

538838 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-14 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.150345020E09 +++$+++ And Todor please change the contatation from '''support''' to (\"'''believes'''\"), cose there is no macedonian supporting such a fulish thing..-- +++$+++ And Todor please change the contatation from '''support''' to ("'''believes'''"), cose there is no macedonian supporting such a fulish thing..--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 21:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538839 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.150339260E09 +++$+++ That's right. You can't comment because: 1. You dont know enough English. 2. Human imagination has its limits, even when we are talking about the imagination of Macedonists refuting historical truths.  +++$+++ :::That's right. You can't comment because: 1. You dont know enough English. 2. Human imagination has its limits, even when we are talking about the imagination of Macedonists refuting historical truths. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 19:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538840 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.150338300E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.poa-info.org\/v_cont.php?l=mk&r=vesti&g=2006&p=05&v=20060512.html Ahem]... -- +++$+++ :[http://www.poa-info.org/v_cont.php?l=mk&r=vesti&g=2006&p=05&v=20060512.html Ahem]... --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 19:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538841 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.150338720E09 +++$+++ Also, I think the [[:mk:|\"Macedonian\" Wikipedia]] is what people should really beware. They seem to have some [http:\/\/mk.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%BC%D1%83%D0%B8%D0%BB&diff=49000&oldid=48999 really] [http:\/\/mk.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=%D0%91%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0&diff=prev&oldid=32333 weird] inclusion and exclusion [http:\/\/mk.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0&diff=prev&oldid=35664 criteria]. -- +++$+++ :Also, I think the [[:mk:|"Macedonian" Wikipedia]] is what people should really beware. They seem to have some [http://mk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%BC%D1%83%D0%B8%D0%BB&diff=49000&oldid=48999 really] [http://mk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%91%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0&diff=prev&oldid=32333 weird] inclusion and exclusion [http://mk.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0&diff=prev&oldid=35664 criteria]. --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 19:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538842 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ 538841 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.150338720E09 +++$+++ I'm flattered, TeleFunkopedia would then be something that is well sourced, unlike [http:\/\/dmoz.org\/Society\/History\/By_Region\/Europe\/Macedonia\/ DMOZ], which is basically as Macedonistic as they come. Vlatko, you may even [http:\/\/dmoz.org\/cgi-bin\/apply.cgi?submit=Proceed&where=Society%2FHistory%2FBy_Region%2FEurope%2FMacedonia&id=&lk=&loc= apply] for an editor, after you improve your English to at least en-2.  +++$+++ ::I'm flattered, TeleFunkopedia would then be something that is well sourced, unlike [http://dmoz.org/Society/History/By_Region/Europe/Macedonia/ DMOZ], which is basically as Macedonistic as they come. Vlatko, you may even [http://dmoz.org/cgi-bin/apply.cgi?submit=Proceed&where=Society%2FHistory%2FBy_Region%2FEurope%2FMacedonia&id=&lk=&loc= apply] for an editor, after you improve your English to at least en-2. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 19:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538843 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.150346100E09 +++$+++ And still there is 95% \"Greek Greece\". And just knowing some Macedonian and the alphabet means that you can't write books still, to early at this level (I'm telling you this as a friend), the comments are satisfactory you know, bot not eligable. And just for you Funky I recognise that i do make mestakes throught writing, what more do you want me to do, a play with the userboxes, the comments you do are of the tipe when someone knows not what to say.-- +++$+++ :::::And still there is 95% "Greek Greece". And just knowing some Macedonian and the alphabet means that you can't write books still, to early at this level (I'm telling you this as a friend), the comments are satisfactory you know, bot not eligable. And just for you Funky I recognise that i do make mestakes throught writing, what more do you want me to do, a play with the userboxes, the comments you do are of the tipe when someone knows not what to say.--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 21:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538844 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.150339560E09 +++$+++ I'd rather not fill Todor's talk with crap but I'll just say that I feel for you. It is tough to be alone in the cause, its tough to deal with the effects of overwhelming evidence against a lie you've been told since you were 7, so you got my respect for your heroism. A true soldier fights to the grave, so we expect great things from you.  +++$+++ ::::::I'd rather not fill Todor's talk with crap but I'll just say that I feel for you. It is tough to be alone in the cause, its tough to deal with the effects of overwhelming evidence against a lie you've been told since you were 7, so you got my respect for your heroism. A true soldier fights to the grave, so we expect great things from you. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 19:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538845 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.150350780E09 +++$+++ Oh, be serious, now an \"enciclopedist\", after that a hacker, later psychologist, why not and a linguist... Fynky, Funky, Funky.....-- +++$+++ :::::::::Oh, be serious, now an "enciclopedist", after that a hacker, later psychologist, why not and a linguist... Fynky, Funky, Funky.....--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 22:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538846 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.150345800E09 +++$+++ Be a little pragmatic. People can google your comments that you have made here in Wikipedia, and your employment prospects in the country might suffer. Especially those [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Samuil_of_Bulgaria&diff=56215147&oldid=55997914 edits]. Was there ever \"Boris I of Macedonia\", or were you just blatantly replacing Bulgarian with Macedonian? Or is that another one of your \"just human\" mistakes, accidently reverting to an anonymous user, like you uploaded at least 20 images marked as \"self-made\", which you in fact downloaded from various sites?  +++$+++ ::::::::::Be a little pragmatic. People can google your comments that you have made here in Wikipedia, and your employment prospects in the country might suffer. Especially those [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samuil_of_Bulgaria&diff=56215147&oldid=55997914 edits]. Was there ever "Boris I of Macedonia", or were you just blatantly replacing Bulgarian with Macedonian? Or is that another one of your "just human" mistakes, accidently reverting to an anonymous user, like you uploaded at least 20 images marked as "self-made", which you in fact downloaded from various sites? [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 21:30, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538847 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.150360380E09 +++$+++ I never made a direct insult to you for beeing Bulgarian, as I do not atack, I only defend my land which is unproperly beeing controversed, Does realy I or you are indoctrinated with something, none can tell, so why re you so \"tvardoglav\".-- +++$+++ :::::::::::::I never made a direct insult to you for beeing Bulgarian, as I do not atack, I only defend my land which is unproperly beeing controversed, Does realy I or you are indoctrinated with something, none can tell, so why re you so "tvardoglav".--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 01:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
538848 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538838 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.150353660E09 +++$+++ Hehe, defend from what? From the truth? No wonder you keep inviting people to \"come to Macedonia\", its like being outside of the Republic might be detrimental to one's Macedonistic beliefs. By the way congratulations on enriching your vocabulary with \"indoctrinated\", you seem to like that word a lot recently. At least one good thing found in Wikipedia.  +++$+++ ::::::::::::::Hehe, defend from what? From the truth? No wonder you keep inviting people to "come to Macedonia", its like being outside of the Republic might be detrimental to one's Macedonistic beliefs. By the way congratulations on enriching your vocabulary with "indoctrinated", you seem to like that word a lot recently. At least one good thing found in Wikipedia. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 23:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

14553 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14553 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.312422900E09 +++$+++ {{od}} There isn't nearly as big of a \"power imbalance issue\" when you remember that those are perennial proposals, i.e. they have been shot down many times by a consensus of community members. No, a majority vote is not consensus, but a majority opinion is (sorry for not being more clear). Like Nick says, administrators are under quite a lot of scrutiny, and I dare say many of our actions are reversed at ANI and other places. Your assertion of a power imbalance is quite wrong, I'm afraid. Avanu, you're not allowed to keep a list of enemies, period. You're allowed to have a page to gather evidence for an upcoming dispute resolution, and that's about it.  +++$+++ {{od}} There isn't nearly as big of a "power imbalance issue" when you remember that those are perennial proposals, i.e. they have been shot down many times by a consensus of community members. No, a majority vote is not consensus, but a majority opinion is (sorry for not being more clear). Like Nick says, administrators are under quite a lot of scrutiny, and I dare say many of our actions are reversed at ANI and other places. Your assertion of a power imbalance is quite wrong, I'm afraid. Avanu, you're not allowed to keep a list of enemies, period. You're allowed to have a page to gather evidence for an upcoming dispute resolution, and that's about it. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 18:55, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14554 +++$+++ Avanu +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14553 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.312440720E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure why you turned that so personal in the last sentence, but I will make it clear again, that the [[WP:ATTACK]] and [[WP:UP#POLEMIC]] policies are primarily about <u>Editorial actions<\/u>, and not about <u>Administrative actions<\/u> (or at least they should not be).  If admins believe that the policies prevent editors from commenting negatively about administrative actions, then we clearly have a [[L\xe8se majest\xe9]] style policy in place, and it needs to be reviewed and amended.  Most admins understand the difference between an Editoral action that puts them in a Conflict of Interest in a debate, versus a purely administrative action which does not, and it is the latter which should be open to critical speech. --  +++$+++ ::I'm not sure why you turned that so personal in the last sentence, but I will make it clear again, that the [[WP:ATTACK]] and [[WP:UP#POLEMIC]] policies are primarily about <u>Editorial actions</u>, and not about <u>Administrative actions</u> (or at least they should not be).  If admins believe that the policies prevent editors from commenting negatively about administrative actions, then we clearly have a [[Lèse majesté]] style policy in place, and it needs to be reviewed and amended.  Most admins understand the difference between an Editoral action that puts them in a Conflict of Interest in a debate, versus a purely administrative action which does not, and it is the latter which should be open to critical speech. -- [[User:Avanu|Avanu]] ([[User talk:Avanu|talk]]) 23:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14555 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14553 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.312450680E09 +++$+++ You've misunderstood me. I'm perfectly fine with people criticizing specific admin actions, mine included; if I wasn't, we would have a rather large problem and I probably wouldn't be a sysop (generally criticizing all admins is different; we're a very diverse group, so we have widely differing views, motivations, and methods). What I won't stand for is a permanent page that is, in essence, a list of all admins who have taken any action contrary to a certain user's viewpoint. That isn't healthy from a community standpoint, and only serves to collect bad blood.  +++$+++ :::You've misunderstood me. I'm perfectly fine with people criticizing specific admin actions, mine included; if I wasn't, we would have a rather large problem and I probably wouldn't be a sysop (generally criticizing all admins is different; we're a very diverse group, so we have widely differing views, motivations, and methods). What I won't stand for is a permanent page that is, in essence, a list of all admins who have taken any action contrary to a certain user's viewpoint. That isn't healthy from a community standpoint, and only serves to collect bad blood. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 02:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
14556 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14553 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.312450920E09 +++$+++ Oh, and a P.S.: everything before \"Avanu\" in my 18:55 post was meant at Surturz, not you. My apologies if there has been any misunderstanding.  +++$+++ :::Oh, and a P.S.: everything before "Avanu" in my 18:55 post was meant at Surturz, not you. My apologies if there has been any misunderstanding. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 02:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

14557 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14557 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.312400280E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Incidents#Deletion_of_a_page_in_my_userspace_without_warning.2C_cause_or_consensus]] -- +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Deletion_of_a_page_in_my_userspace_without_warning.2C_cause_or_consensus]] --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 12:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14558 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14557 +++$+++ 14557 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312403760E09 +++$+++ Ed! You're famous! Surturz, deletion review is the way to go, but you'd be wasting your time.  +++$+++ :Ed! You're famous! Surturz, deletion review is the way to go, but you'd be wasting your time. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 13:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14559 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14557 +++$+++ 14557 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312408440E09 +++$+++ J Milburn - funny, it is going better than I thought it would. -- +++$+++ :J Milburn - funny, it is going better than I thought it would. --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 14:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14560 +++$+++  +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14557 +++$+++ 14559 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.312423020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the notifications. The DRV is going towards overturn because of complaints over incorrect process; it'll be at MFD soon enough, after the community finishes the process involved with the DRV.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the notifications. The DRV is going towards overturn because of complaints over incorrect process; it'll be at MFD soon enough, after the community finishes the process involved with the DRV. [[User:The ed17|Ed]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 18:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14561 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ 14557 +++$+++ 14560 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312528260E09 +++$+++ In the spirit of [[WP:CONS]], could you please read my suggested compromise at [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review\/Log\/2011_August_3#My_preferred_outcome_.28and_arbitrary_section_break.29]] -- +++$+++ :::In the spirit of [[WP:CONS]], could you please read my suggested compromise at [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_August_3#My_preferred_outcome_.28and_arbitrary_section_break.29]] --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 00:11, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

276702 +++$+++ Markco1 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-20 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.164027060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Markco1|Markco1]] 04:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
276703 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276702 +++$+++ 276702 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.164050280E09 +++$+++ Thanks, sorry, I have never actually set foot in the city proper (came close by once, though). Good luck. -- +++$+++ :Thanks, sorry, I have never actually set foot in the city proper (came close by once, though). Good luck. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 11:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

177189 +++$+++ RomaC +++$+++ Jaakobou +++$+++ 177189 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-14 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.258240680E09 +++$+++ With [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Media_coverage_of_the_Arab%E2%80%93Israeli_conflict&curid=530216&diff=325777015&oldid=325626868 this edit] you removed links and in your edit summary wrote ''\"rework, add a couple and remove one which doesn't belong to media coverage in any way.\"'' You removed the link to [[Peace, Propaganda, and the Promised Land]], a documentary which, according to its article here is a \"comparison of U.S. and international media coverage of the crisis in the Middle East.\" Will you please provide accurate edit summaries and, for now, self-revert this removal? Respectfully,  +++$+++ With [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Media_coverage_of_the_Arab%E2%80%93Israeli_conflict&curid=530216&diff=325777015&oldid=325626868 this edit] you removed links and in your edit summary wrote ''"rework, add a couple and remove one which doesn't belong to media coverage in any way."'' You removed the link to [[Peace, Propaganda, and the Promised Land]], a documentary which, according to its article here is a "comparison of U.S. and international media coverage of the crisis in the Middle East." Will you please provide accurate edit summaries and, for now, self-revert this removal? Respectfully, [[User:RomaC|RomaC]] ([[User talk:RomaC|talk]]) 15:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
177190 +++$+++ Jaakobou +++$+++ Jaakobou +++$+++ 177189 +++$+++ 177189 +++$+++ 2009-11-14 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.258242780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note though. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"teal\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for the note though. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">[[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>''[[User talk:Jaakobou|Chalk Talk]]''</sup></font></b> 15:53, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

276704 +++$+++ Jahiegel +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-21 05:50:00 +++$+++ 1.164117000E09 +++$+++ I imagine I ought to drop you a line to let you know that I removed the {{tl|db-repost}} tags from each category in view of each cat's being taken to [[WP:CfD|CfD]] concomitant to its [[pro-life]] counterpart (viz., under an [[Wikipedia:Categories for deletion\/Log\/2006 November 21#Pro-life and pro-choice by profession|umbrella nom]] here), principally because a new substantive discussion ought probably to be permitted to unfold and because, as part of a broader schema apparently proposed [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Abortion#Activist_categories|here]] by members of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Abortion|abortion WikiProject]], the categories are arguably other-than-substantially-identical to those that were deleted and thus not speediable per [[WP:CSD#General criteria|G4]].  I think you to have been altogether right, of course, to have applied the tags, and I'm inclined to think each was speediable; my removal was purely procedural and toward our dealing consistently with the four now-nominated categories.    You should, of course, feel free to retag should you think that the previous CfD ought to control (it's a CfD with the disposition of which, FWIW, I surely concur); I surely won't revert (although [[User:Severa|Severa]], who created the categories ostensibly consistent with the abortion WP discussion, might once more tag for {{tl|hangon}}).  :)   +++$+++ I imagine I ought to drop you a line to let you know that I removed the {{tl|db-repost}} tags from each category in view of each cat's being taken to [[WP:CfD|CfD]] concomitant to its [[pro-life]] counterpart (viz., under an [[Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 November 21#Pro-life and pro-choice by profession|umbrella nom]] here), principally because a new substantive discussion ought probably to be permitted to unfold and because, as part of a broader schema apparently proposed [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Abortion#Activist_categories|here]] by members of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Abortion|abortion WikiProject]], the categories are arguably other-than-substantially-identical to those that were deleted and thus not speediable per [[WP:CSD#General criteria|G4]].  I think you to have been altogether right, of course, to have applied the tags, and I'm inclined to think each was speediable; my removal was purely procedural and toward our dealing consistently with the four now-nominated categories.    You should, of course, feel free to retag should you think that the previous CfD ought to control (it's a CfD with the disposition of which, FWIW, I surely concur); I surely won't revert (although [[User:Severa|Severa]], who created the categories ostensibly consistent with the abortion WP discussion, might once more tag for {{tl|hangon}}).  :)  [[User:Jahiegel|Joe]] 05:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
276705 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276704 +++$+++ 276704 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.164134820E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I knew this was one possible outcome and I don't have an argument with a proper CFD. -- +++$+++ :Thanks, I knew this was one possible outcome and I don't have an argument with a proper CFD. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 10:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

538849 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-15 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.150360980E09 +++$+++ Your comments are unrealistic by pointing relative things, make a point, maybe the problem here is you. I give up cose from one side you rapidly jump to the other, had someone already told you that no one can find the end with you {{fact}}.-- +++$+++ Your comments are unrealistic by pointing relative things, make a point, maybe the problem here is you. I give up cose from one side you rapidly jump to the other, had someone already told you that no one can find the end with you {{fact}}.--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 01:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
538850 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538849 +++$+++ 538849 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.150354260E09 +++$+++ Just when I was getting started you quit, come on! I dont expect that you repent for your mistakes, but dont make them in the future. This whole dialog developed as I tend to expose people which claim one thing and do another, or in other words lie.  +++$+++ :Just when I was getting started you quit, come on! I dont expect that you repent for your mistakes, but dont make them in the future. This whole dialog developed as I tend to expose people which claim one thing and do another, or in other words lie. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 23:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538851 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538849 +++$+++ 538850 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.150361400E09 +++$+++ About what, come on, say it, \"you lied here and here\". And the word \"bubling\" is for you, you say it so  here \"klukarki\".-- +++$+++ ::About what, come on, say it, "you lied here and here". And the word "bubling" is for you, you say it so  here "klukarki".--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 01:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
538852 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538849 +++$+++ 538851 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.150354620E09 +++$+++ That image licence \"self-made\" thing, for which you might get banned, remember?  +++$+++ :::That image licence "self-made" thing, for which you might get banned, remember? [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 23:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
538853 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538849 +++$+++ 538852 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.150361760E09 +++$+++ And I'm the one that is not advancing. I did that with no intention. Realy why are you so sure in the History book that is learned in Bulgaria, a human like me and you wrote it.-- +++$+++ ::::And I'm the one that is not advancing. I did that with no intention. Realy why are you so sure in the History book that is learned in Bulgaria, a human like me and you wrote it.--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 01:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
538854 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538849 +++$+++ 538853 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.150355100E09 +++$+++ You'd better make sure it is not advancing by presenting proper licences. I dont expect history books to be written by anything but humans. Jee, I'd kill for an alien history book.  +++$+++ :::::You'd better make sure it is not advancing by presenting proper licences. I dont expect history books to be written by anything but humans. Jee, I'd kill for an alien history book. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 00:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
538855 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538849 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-15 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.150362180E09 +++$+++ Aha, relay Funky I started to respect you, you made the point here. But I have to go. Good night.-- +++$+++ :::::::Aha, relay Funky I started to respect you, you made the point here. But I have to go. Good night.--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 02:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

14562 +++$+++ Ohiostandard +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14562 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-24 07:22:00 +++$+++ 1.303654920E09 +++$+++ So if you feel there are still open issues that need discussion, you can and should (a) ask Berean to revert his edit, or, if he's not online, and because threads at AN\/I roll off to archives after 24 hours of inactivity, (b) just revert it yourself, citing the passage from [[WP:RTP]]. I'm undecided about this; I may do it myself before you see this message; it's my opinion that \"closures\" like that should almost never be done at AN\/I where, almost by definition, there ''are'' \"recent heated discussions\" and where trust is often pretty thin on the ground. If you'd like to reply, feel free to do so here; I've temporarily watchlisted this page. &nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;<font face=\"Cambria\"> +++$+++ So if you feel there are still open issues that need discussion, you can and should (a) ask Berean to revert his edit, or, if he's not online, and because threads at AN/I roll off to archives after 24 hours of inactivity, (b) just revert it yourself, citing the passage from [[WP:RTP]]. I'm undecided about this; I may do it myself before you see this message; it's my opinion that "closures" like that should almost never be done at AN/I where, almost by definition, there ''are'' "recent heated discussions" and where trust is often pretty thin on the ground. If you'd like to reply, feel free to do so here; I've temporarily watchlisted this page. &nbsp;–&nbsp;<font face="Cambria">[[User:Ohiostandard|<font color="teal">'''OhioStandard'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Ohiostandard|talk]])</font> 07:22, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
14563 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14562 +++$+++ 14562 +++$+++ 2011-04-24 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.303656660E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I raised a more general issue about Jamie, but it's unclear anyone else thinks the same. Since there was no other comment along those lines I don't think I'll push to keep it open. I will leave a message on Magog's page however to see if he agrees - the hatting ''was'' strangely peremptory.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I raised a more general issue about Jamie, but it's unclear anyone else thinks the same. Since there was no other comment along those lines I don't think I'll push to keep it open. I will leave a message on Magog's page however to see if he agrees - the hatting ''was'' strangely peremptory. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 07:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
14564 +++$+++ Ohiostandard +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14562 +++$+++ 14563 +++$+++ 2011-04-24 08:11:00 +++$+++ 1.303657860E09 +++$+++ Well, other users had less than 2 hours to comment before Berean shut down discussion. I probably would have commented myself, if it hadn't been hatted. In fact, I \"unhatted\" the thread just a moment ago, and was about to post here to tell you so, when I got an edit conflict and saw your 07:51 post, just above. So I immediately self-reverted the \"unhat\" at AN\/I; it would have been silly for me to re-open it if you didn't want it re-opened. Anyway, talk it over with Magog, and maybe the IP who also wanted further discussion; I'll look in on the section before it ages off to archives, and will comment there if I see it's re-opened. All I'd suggest is that if you do re-open it, that you might want to use [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=425627666 the same edit summary] I did, to help prevent an edit war ... which would be rather unseemly, at AN\/I, imo. ;-) Best, &nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;<font face=\"Cambria\"> +++$+++ ::Well, other users had less than 2 hours to comment before Berean shut down discussion. I probably would have commented myself, if it hadn't been hatted. In fact, I "unhatted" the thread just a moment ago, and was about to post here to tell you so, when I got an edit conflict and saw your 07:51 post, just above. So I immediately self-reverted the "unhat" at AN/I; it would have been silly for me to re-open it if you didn't want it re-opened. Anyway, talk it over with Magog, and maybe the IP who also wanted further discussion; I'll look in on the section before it ages off to archives, and will comment there if I see it's re-opened. All I'd suggest is that if you do re-open it, that you might want to use [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=425627666 the same edit summary] I did, to help prevent an edit war ... which would be rather unseemly, at AN/I, imo. ;-) Best, &nbsp;–&nbsp;<font face="Cambria">[[User:Ohiostandard|<font color="teal">'''OhioStandard'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Ohiostandard|talk]])</font> 08:11, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
14565 +++$+++ Ohiostandard +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14562 +++$+++ 14563 +++$+++ 2011-04-24 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.303685940E09 +++$+++ Okay, I've thought about this for a while, and I want to comment at AN\/I myself. I don't know if anyone else will, but Berean's quick closure made it impossible for us to know. That was improper, imo, and I've decided to re-open the thread myself. It'll probably just roll off to archives, but even just one user still wanting to comment is sufficient reason to remove the hat. &nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;<font face=\"Cambria\"> +++$+++ ::Okay, I've thought about this for a while, and I want to comment at AN/I myself. I don't know if anyone else will, but Berean's quick closure made it impossible for us to know. That was improper, imo, and I've decided to re-open the thread myself. It'll probably just roll off to archives, but even just one user still wanting to comment is sufficient reason to remove the hat. &nbsp;–&nbsp;<font face="Cambria">[[User:Ohiostandard|<font color="teal">'''OhioStandard'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Ohiostandard|talk]])</font> 15:59, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

14566 +++$+++ Pacomartin +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-30 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.304207820E09 +++$+++ Where did you get that stuff about primary sources bad, secondary sources good? I have been adding stuff to this article on House of Windsor for over 2.5 years so that a significant portion of the article is my own edits and I have never heard that going to a primary source is bad. Most people prefer a primary source over a secondary source. I am not interpreting a primary source, just making a literal reading of the document. +++$+++ Where did you get that stuff about primary sources bad, secondary sources good? I have been adding stuff to this article on House of Windsor for over 2.5 years so that a significant portion of the article is my own edits and I have never heard that going to a primary source is bad. Most people prefer a primary source over a secondary source. I am not interpreting a primary source, just making a literal reading of the document.[[User:Pacomartin|Pacomartin]] ([[User talk:Pacomartin|talk]]) 16:57, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
14567 +++$+++ Kuru +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14566 +++$+++ 14566 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.304212320E09 +++$+++ See [[WP:PRIMARY]].  The vast majority of our material should be secondary sources, but there are many cases for exceptions. Caution is the key.  +++$+++ :See [[WP:PRIMARY]].  The vast majority of our material should be secondary sources, but there are many cases for exceptions. Caution is the key. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk)''</span>]] 18:12, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
14568 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14566 +++$+++ 14567 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.304220180E09 +++$+++ Pacomartin, I deliberately oversimplified Wikipedia policy since you didn't seem to be getting it. As Kuru says, I'm getting it from [[WP:PRIMARY]] which I'm surprised you don't know about. You can use primary sources simply as evidence of what they say eg \"the Bible says X\" and then cite the relevant biblical chapter. What you can't do with primary sources is draw any wider conclusions - which is exactly what you've been trying to do with the Letters Patent - because it will end up being [[WP:Synthesis|synthesis]] or even worse [[WP:OR|original research]] both of which are prohibited at Wikipedia. \"Most people prefer a primary source\". yes, in academia and the outside world, ''but not Wikipedia''. How do you not know that after 2.5 years. This is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia.  +++$+++ ::Pacomartin, I deliberately oversimplified Wikipedia policy since you didn't seem to be getting it. As Kuru says, I'm getting it from [[WP:PRIMARY]] which I'm surprised you don't know about. You can use primary sources simply as evidence of what they say eg "the Bible says X" and then cite the relevant biblical chapter. What you can't do with primary sources is draw any wider conclusions - which is exactly what you've been trying to do with the Letters Patent - because it will end up being [[WP:Synthesis|synthesis]] or even worse [[WP:OR|original research]] both of which are prohibited at Wikipedia. "Most people prefer a primary source". yes, in academia and the outside world, ''but not Wikipedia''. How do you not know that after 2.5 years. This is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 20:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

570407 +++$+++ MBisanz +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-24 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.214308560E09 +++$+++ David, is there a way to use a css option to force the background of tmbox to be white? ''' +++$+++ David, is there a way to use a css option to force the background of tmbox to be white? '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 04:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
570408 +++$+++ MBisanz +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570407 +++$+++ 570407 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.214308860E09 +++$+++ Actually, I just tested it at [[User:MBisanz\/BAG1]] and it works. ''' +++$+++ :Actually, I just tested it at [[User:MBisanz/BAG1]] and it works. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 05:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
570409 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570407 +++$+++ 570408 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.214309940E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 05:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
570410 +++$+++ MBisanz +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570407 +++$+++ 570409 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.214310480E09 +++$+++ I like the second one a lot, see I have a bunch of templates that must maintain the same appearance they had before, as they are legacy templates used by people who don't want the appearance changed, so I can now convert them to tmbox, without changing the background color. ''' +++$+++ :::I like the second one a lot, see I have a bunch of templates that must maintain the same appearance they had before, as they are legacy templates used by people who don't want the appearance changed, so I can now convert them to tmbox, without changing the background color. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 05:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
570411 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570407 +++$+++ 570410 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.214311020E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 05:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
570412 +++$+++ MBisanz +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570407 +++$+++ 570411 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.214311140E09 +++$+++ More or less my urge to standardize everything, no performance gains. ''' +++$+++ :::::More or less my urge to standardize everything, no performance gains. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 05:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

14572 +++$+++ Snowded +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14572 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-19 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.305858360E09 +++$+++ Welcome to the world of Mick -- +++$+++ Welcome to the world of Mick --[[User:Snowded|<font color="#801818" face="Papyrus">'''Snowded'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Snowded#top|<font color="#708090" face="Baskerville">TALK</font>]]</sup></small>  19:26, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
14573 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14572 +++$+++ 14572 +++$+++ 2011-05-19 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.305865500E09 +++$+++ Yes, I can see that's an enlightening world.  +++$+++ :Yes, I can see that's an enlightening world. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 21:25, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

276718 +++$+++ JRHorse +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.165393200E09 +++$+++ FYI, it appears a \"campaign\" has begun where people are signing up to Wikipedia for the purpose of saying \"Keep\" on the James Girvin AfD page ([[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/James_Girvin]]). This is the first time I'm seeing such a movement, if you wish to call it that... :) Have you seen something like this in the past?  +++$+++ FYI, it appears a "campaign" has begun where people are signing up to Wikipedia for the purpose of saying "Keep" on the James Girvin AfD page ([[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_Girvin]]). This is the first time I'm seeing such a movement, if you wish to call it that... :) Have you seen something like this in the past? [[User:JRHorse|JRHorse]] 00:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
276719 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276718 +++$+++ 276718 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.165402200E09 +++$+++ It happens occasionally, usually w\/r\/t vanity articles and obscure websites. There's a template {{tl|afdanons}} for this purpose, which I've added. Generally it's not as influential a problem as it may seem, because even though there may be many such \"votes\", they usually don't refer back to Wikipedia policy, which is what the closing administrator should take note of. -- +++$+++ :It happens occasionally, usually w/r/t vanity articles and obscure websites. There's a template {{tl|afdanons}} for this purpose, which I've added. Generally it's not as influential a problem as it may seem, because even though there may be many such "votes", they usually don't refer back to Wikipedia policy, which is what the closing administrator should take note of. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 02:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

538863 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-20 09:44:00 +++$+++ 1.150821840E09 +++$+++ You might want to participate here: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion\/Log\/2006_June_20#Template:Danube.2C_Template:Danube_Countries] -- +++$+++ You might want to participate here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_June_20#Template:Danube.2C_Template:Danube_Countries] --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 09:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538864 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538863 +++$+++ 538863 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.150837740E09 +++$+++ You just violated [[WP:NLT]] - expect a ban very shortly. -- +++$+++ :You just violated [[WP:NLT]] - expect a ban very shortly. --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 14:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

538865 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-20 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.150851240E09 +++$+++ You think you really know macedonian, why (hahahaha)?-- +++$+++ You think you really know macedonian, why (hahahaha)?--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 17:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538866 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.150844640E09 +++$+++ Because [[Macedonian language]] = [[Bulgarian language]], just the same way as [[Moldovan language]] = [[Romanian language]] or [[Montenegrin language]] = [[Serbian language]]. -- +++$+++ :Because [[Macedonian language]] = [[Bulgarian language]], just the same way as [[Moldovan language]] = [[Romanian language]] or [[Montenegrin language]] = [[Serbian language]]. --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 16:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538867 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ 538866 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.150845300E09 +++$+++ BUT a wise man said: ''\"A language is a dialect with an army and a navy...\"'' Keep this ''\"I don't understand why you speak both languages\"'' tune and a stronger army or navy may decide to demote your language to a mere dialect. You see, my friend Vlatko, personally I value your independence and sovereignity but I can understand how irrational claims (such as that the languages are different because they are indeed different - not because we say so) can sometimes cause irrational responses by irrational neighbors. I wouldn't bet that if e.g. Bulgarians (or Greeks) had as strong nationalistic sentiments as you do, you would continue much longer to be proud about your ''dialect'' having an army and a navy of its own, and hence being a ''language''... +++$+++ ::BUT a wise man said: ''"A language is a dialect with an army and a navy..."'' Keep this ''"I don't understand why you speak both languages"'' tune and a stronger army or navy may decide to demote your language to a mere dialect. You see, my friend Vlatko, personally I value your independence and sovereignity but I can understand how irrational claims (such as that the languages are different because they are indeed different - not because we say so) can sometimes cause irrational responses by irrational neighbors. I wouldn't bet that if e.g. Bulgarians (or Greeks) had as strong nationalistic sentiments as you do, you would continue much longer to be proud about your ''dialect'' having an army and a navy of its own, and hence being a ''language''...[[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">:N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>:</span>]] 16:15, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538868 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ 538867 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.150845480E09 +++$+++ I'm sure Vlatkoto might have thought of it, but just in case: according to some Republican estimates, the number of people in Bulgaria, descended from refugees from the region of Macedonia is about 3 to 4 million. And of course, as we all know, once a Slav enters Bulgaria, he loses his Slav privileges and becomes a Tataro-Mongolian.  +++$+++ :::I'm sure Vlatkoto might have thought of it, but just in case: according to some Republican estimates, the number of people in Bulgaria, descended from refugees from the region of Macedonia is about 3 to 4 million. And of course, as we all know, once a Slav enters Bulgaria, he loses his Slav privileges and becomes a Tataro-Mongolian. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 16:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538869 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ 538867 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.150852560E09 +++$+++ And again the inteligense won, congratulations Telex and '''Funk''', You stuck again. Tell me is the greek language actualy ''dimotiki''. What does it means as a such one? Do you know. And Macedonian and Bulgarian are not the same, ask me I know the best. Please do not reffer to Macedonian as a dialect of Bulgarian(questionable language).-- +++$+++ :::And again the inteligense won, congratulations Telex and '''Funk''', You stuck again. Tell me is the greek language actualy ''dimotiki''. What does it means as a such one? Do you know. And Macedonian and Bulgarian are not the same, ask me I know the best. Please do not reffer to Macedonian as a dialect of Bulgarian(questionable language).--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 18:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538870 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.150845720E09 +++$+++ The only questionable thing is your ability to express yourself in English.  +++$+++ :::::The only questionable thing is your ability to express yourself in English. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 16:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538871 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.150845900E09 +++$+++ The modern Greek language is actually Standard Modern Greek (\u039a\u03bf\u03b9\u03bd\u03ae \u039d\u03b5\u03bf\u03b5\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae) and is somewhat of a merge between ''Dhimotiki'' and ''Katharevusa'' (which are both Greek). The Modern Macedonian language on the other hand is actually a merge between two allegedly foreign elements: the Bulgarian language and the Serbian alphabet ;-) Back to NikoSilver, does FYROM really have an army and a navy? I thought they had neither ;-) -- +++$+++ ::::::The modern Greek language is actually Standard Modern Greek (Κοινή Νεοελληνική) and is somewhat of a merge between ''Dhimotiki'' and ''Katharevusa'' (which are both Greek). The Modern Macedonian language on the other hand is actually a merge between two allegedly foreign elements: the Bulgarian language and the Serbian alphabet ;-) Back to NikoSilver, does FYROM really have an army and a navy? I thought they had neither ;-) --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 16:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538872 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.150845960E09 +++$+++ I think they have patrol boats in the Ohrid and Prespa lakes, if they count as Navy.  +++$+++ :::::::I think they have patrol boats in the Ohrid and Prespa lakes, if they count as Navy. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 16:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538873 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.150846200E09 +++$+++ They scrapped the decommissioned Bulgarian tanks that were once given to them as a present, that's for sure. As for the patrol boats, I think they're part of the [[coast guard|coast (shore?) guard]] or the police. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ :::::::: They scrapped the decommissioned Bulgarian tanks that were once given to them as a present, that's for sure. As for the patrol boats, I think they're part of the [[coast guard|coast (shore?) guard]] or the police. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 16:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538874 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.150853220E09 +++$+++ Listen you bouth, it is stupid for anyone to read your bunch of '''TeleFunk'''clasifications, it seems as you are the smartest, and the ultranationalism mantioned it is expresed in all your statements, make an argue between you. I can only feel sorow for you. I'm realy asking my self who of you is Greek or Bulgarian, this Balkan aliance happens again 100 year after. Can I google some source to convince me in the other, And the comment of Todor(kitkata) is here finaly-- +++$+++ :::::::::Listen you bouth, it is stupid for anyone to read your bunch of '''TeleFunk'''clasifications, it seems as you are the smartest, and the ultranationalism mantioned it is expresed in all your statements, make an argue between you. I can only feel sorow for you. I'm realy asking my self who of you is Greek or Bulgarian, this Balkan aliance happens again 100 year after. Can I google some source to convince me in the other, And the comment of Todor(kitkata) is here finaly--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 18:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538875 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.150846740E09 +++$+++ Paranoia, Balkan alliance? Careful, you might [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Macedonism&diff=prev&oldid=59328107 lose] it again, and this time could have more serious consequences.  +++$+++ ::::::::::Paranoia, Balkan alliance? Careful, you might [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Macedonism&diff=prev&oldid=59328107 lose] it again, and this time could have more serious consequences. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 16:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538876 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538865 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.150846800E09 +++$+++ Btw, TeleFunk reminds me of TeleFunken, they used to make nice cassette players in the 80s. I dont know if they still exist. Oh wow, they still [[Telefunken|do]].  +++$+++ ::::::::::Btw, TeleFunk reminds me of TeleFunken, they used to make nice cassette players in the 80s. I dont know if they still exist. Oh wow, they still [[Telefunken|do]]. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 16:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

14578 +++$+++ HuskyHuskie +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-22 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.306126740E09 +++$+++ From [[WP:BS]]: ''The \"What a Brilliant Idea!\" Barnstar should be awarded to a user who figures out an elegant solution to a particularly burdensome bottleneck or problem''.  That's '''you'''![http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Abortion-rights_movement&diff=426963280&oldid=426955835]  +++$+++ From [[WP:BS]]: ''The "What a Brilliant Idea!" Barnstar should be awarded to a user who figures out an elegant solution to a particularly burdensome bottleneck or problem''.  That's '''you'''![http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Abortion-rights_movement&diff=426963280&oldid=426955835] [[User:HuskyHuskie|HuskyHuskie]] ([[User talk:HuskyHuskie|talk]]) 21:59, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
14579 +++$+++ HuskyHuskie +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14578 +++$+++ 14578 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.306241220E09 +++$+++ You may have taken note the issue is ''not'' yet settled; it may never be.  But if it is, I'm sure it will based upon your suggestion.  +++$+++ :You may have taken note the issue is ''not'' yet settled; it may never be.  But if it is, I'm sure it will based upon your suggestion. [[User:HuskyHuskie|HuskyHuskie]] ([[User talk:HuskyHuskie|talk]]) 05:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

276723 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-23 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.166910660E09 +++$+++ Hi.  Your edit summary [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Annette_Richardson_Dinwoodey&diff=next&oldid=96064995 here] includes \"wk\" which I assume means me?  But the comment you responded to wasn't mine.  Just a quick FYI...  \u2014 +++$+++ Hi.  Your edit summary [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Annette_Richardson_Dinwoodey&diff=next&oldid=96064995 here] includes "wk" which I assume means me?  But the comment you responded to wasn't mine.  Just a quick FYI...  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 13:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
276724 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276723 +++$+++ 276723 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.166937900E09 +++$+++ Ah, sorry about that. My \"wk\" means a \"weak keep\" vote, nothing about you. You'll probably see it again.... -- +++$+++ :Ah, sorry about that. My "wk" means a "weak keep" vote, nothing about you. You'll probably see it again.... --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 21:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

14581 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-25 08:15:00 +++$+++ 1.306336500E09 +++$+++ As userspace is indexed by Google, it's a good idea to add <nowiki>{{userspace}}<\/nowiki> and <nowiki>__NOINDEX__<\/nowiki> at the top of drafts, etc. Thanks.  +++$+++ As userspace is indexed by Google, it's a good idea to add <nowiki>{{userspace}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>__NOINDEX__</nowiki> at the top of drafts, etc. Thanks. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 08:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
14582 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14581 +++$+++ 14581 +++$+++ 2011-05-25 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.306336740E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Didn't know that.  +++$+++ :Thanks! Didn't know that. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 08:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

14583 +++$+++ Daicaregos +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-28 10:03:00 +++$+++ 1.306602180E09 +++$+++ Hi there, just wanted you to know that I intend to reply to you on the subject of country. Obviously, any reply with take some consideration, but I have some RL deadline priorities to deal with at the moment, so it may not be soon. I'm sure the issue will not change in the meantime so, please be patient with me. By the way, I thought the work you did on UK etymology greatly improved the scope, balance and all round 'understandability' of the article. Nice one.  +++$+++ Hi there, just wanted you to know that I intend to reply to you on the subject of country. Obviously, any reply with take some consideration, but I have some RL deadline priorities to deal with at the moment, so it may not be soon. I'm sure the issue will not change in the meantime so, please be patient with me. By the way, I thought the work you did on UK etymology greatly improved the scope, balance and all round 'understandability' of the article. Nice one. [[User:Daicaregos|Daicaregos]] ([[User talk:Daicaregos|talk]]) 10:03, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
14584 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14583 +++$+++ 14583 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.306602300E09 +++$+++ thanks. No hurry on \"country\" - whenever you can.  +++$+++ :thanks. No hurry on "country" - whenever you can. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 10:05, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

14586 +++$+++ Sabrebd +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14586 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-30 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.306779120E09 +++$+++ Your efforts much appreciated.--'''<span style=\"font-family:Black Chancery;text:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;\"> +++$+++ Your efforts much appreciated.--'''<span style="font-family:Black Chancery;text:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">[[User:Sabrebd|<span style="color:blue;">SabreBD</span>]] ([[User talk:Sabrebd|talk</span>]]) 11:12, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
14587 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14586 +++$+++ 14586 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.306781520E09 +++$+++ Fully endorsed by me - thanks!   +++$+++ :Fully endorsed by me - thanks!  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 11:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

276731 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276731 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.167798660E09 +++$+++ Has anyone ever suggested that you run for Adminship? You're ridiculously qualified and appear to be non-controversial. You're being drafted because we have a lot of backlogs. ''You can not refuse''. - <b> +++$+++ Has anyone ever suggested that you run for Adminship? You're ridiculously qualified and appear to be non-controversial. You're being drafted because we have a lot of backlogs. ''You can not refuse''. - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|crz]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|crztalk]]</small> 20:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
276732 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276731 +++$+++ 276731 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.167801840E09 +++$+++ In any event I am duly flattered. -- +++$+++ :In any event I am duly flattered. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 21:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
276733 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276731 +++$+++ 276732 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.167922620E09 +++$+++ Username change requests may be filed at [[WP:CHU]]. Let me know when you're ready - you'll be a shoo-in. - <b> +++$+++ ::Username change requests may be filed at [[WP:CHU]]. Let me know when you're ready - you'll be a shoo-in. - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|crz]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|crztalk]]</small> 06:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

538877 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-20 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.150853640E09 +++$+++ '''Funk''' you have no problem, you are born as a such one, we'll see who is going to lose. Todor your opinion is your right , I do not atack you, you can expres your self how much you want and how you want, I just want to disscus with you about the relevancy of your judjments. And yeah you bouth seem like a Radio (''Erevan'')-- +++$+++ '''Funk''' you have no problem, you are born as a such one, we'll see who is going to lose. Todor your opinion is your right , I do not atack you, you can expres your self how much you want and how you want, I just want to disscus with you about the relevancy of your judjments. And yeah you bouth seem like a Radio (''Erevan'')--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 18:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538878 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.150847160E09 +++$+++ Lose? Who's winning and who's losing? And I'll quote you: \"This is not a game\". Apparently you treat wikipedia as a game, despite your accusations.  +++$+++ :Lose? Who's winning and who's losing? And I'll quote you: "This is not a game". Apparently you treat wikipedia as a game, despite your accusations. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 16:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538879 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538878 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.150854240E09 +++$+++ No, '''Funk'', it is you living in a game. I'll never do the things your way. You said that we might lose agin, you recognised something here, I'm glad you started to ask your self something other, Realy good-- +++$+++ ::No, '''Funk'', it is you living in a game. I'll never do the things your way. You said that we might lose agin, you recognised something here, I'm glad you started to ask your self something other, Realy good--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 18:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538880 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538879 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.150847520E09 +++$+++ Which game, can I play? Is it that one about creative history (re)writing? I hear the world champions at that game are the Macedonians, and that their first gaming club was the ASNOM lobby. -- +++$+++ :::Which game, can I play? Is it that one about creative history (re)writing? I hear the world champions at that game are the Macedonians, and that their first gaming club was the ASNOM lobby. --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 16:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538881 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538880 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.150847820E09 +++$+++ Awww, lose it again. Well Vlatkoto,  in this context \"Lose it\" means you \"go berserk\", not lose a game. But you should know that, after all you proudly list '''en-3''', right? Or should I speak in simpler terms your '''en-3''' can deal with?  +++$+++ ::::Awww, lose it again. Well Vlatkoto,  in this context "Lose it" means you "go berserk", not lose a game. But you should know that, after all you proudly list '''en-3''', right? Or should I speak in simpler terms your '''en-3''' can deal with? [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk<span style="text-decoration: blink">_ </span></b>&nbsp;</span>]] 16:57, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538882 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538881 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.150848060E09 +++$+++ Vlatko - I really do think you should change your English rating. If I used babelboxes, I would rate my English en-3. See [[Wikipedia:Babel\/Levels]] to see how how to pick levels. -- +++$+++ :::::Vlatko - I really do think you should change your English rating. If I used babelboxes, I would rate my English en-3. See [[Wikipedia:Babel/Levels]] to see how how to pick levels. --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 17:01, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538883 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538882 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.150860000E09 +++$+++ Where on the scale of english ability is this sentence: \"You suck\", and after all I'm playing games.-- +++$+++ ::::::Where on the scale of english ability is this sentence: "You suck", and after all I'm playing games.--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 20:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538884 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538883 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.150853280E09 +++$+++ It depends, if it refers to sucking a lollypop, it could be en-1, however if it refers to your usage of English, it must be at least en-2. (that's a bit of a paradox in itself)  +++$+++ :::::::It depends, if it refers to sucking a lollypop, it could be en-1, however if it refers to your usage of English, it must be at least en-2. (that's a bit of a paradox in itself) [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk_</b>&nbsp;</span>]] 18:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538885 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538884 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.150853400E09 +++$+++ Have you considered not using language boxes at all? After all, Funky and I don't use them. I only have one for a dialect not part of the English language. -- +++$+++ ::::::::Have you considered not using language boxes at all? After all, Funky and I don't use them. I only have one for a dialect not part of the English language. --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 18:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538886 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538878 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.150860360E09 +++$+++ Listen Todor, do not dream to much, it will confuse you. None was renamed after WWII, there are 10000000000000 of stories told from our macedonian ancestorts about the Bulgarian war crimes in Macedonia in WWII period, all of them agains the Macedonian people, lots of them I have heard from mine grandparents, the father of my grandmother was in jail and brutally tortured by the Bulgarians, '''just''' for you national cause. Pleas consider what you have just said.-- +++$+++ ::Listen Todor, do not dream to much, it will confuse you. None was renamed after WWII, there are 10000000000000 of stories told from our macedonian ancestorts about the Bulgarian war crimes in Macedonia in WWII period, all of them agains the Macedonian people, lots of them I have heard from mine grandparents, the father of my grandmother was in jail and brutally tortured by the Bulgarians, '''just''' for you national cause. Pleas consider what you have just said.--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 20:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538887 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538886 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.150856220E09 +++$+++ Oh, finally the reason for all hatred surfaces! Deal with it. You know English is important, it's BIG plus for Bulgarian outsourcing software companies. So if you want to find a decent job, you have to know good English. I mean good, not your en-3.  +++$+++ :::Oh, finally the reason for all hatred surfaces! Deal with it. You know English is important, it's BIG plus for Bulgarian outsourcing software companies. So if you want to find a decent job, you have to know good English. I mean good, not your en-3. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk_</b>&nbsp;</span>]] 19:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538888 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538887 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.150864440E09 +++$+++ Good you finaly have shown that you've started to be sceptic '''Funk''', why are you then  so antimacedonistic.-- +++$+++ ::::Good you finaly have shown that you've started to be sceptic '''Funk''', why are you then  so antimacedonistic.--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 21:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538889 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538888 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.150857780E09 +++$+++ Because I hold the belief that history should not be adjusted to suit the needs of a particular ethnic group, and should be left unchanged.  +++$+++ :::::Because I hold the belief that history should not be adjusted to suit the needs of a particular ethnic group, and should be left unchanged. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk_</b>&nbsp;</span>]] 19:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
538890 +++$+++ Vlatkoto +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538877 +++$+++ 538887 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.150867380E09 +++$+++ I disagree, the word adjust is not the right one, if that's the case we all adjust the quotes somehow even without not recogniseing it (our mind functiones so), we all believe in something by the way, and we are learned in something... our conclusions come from there. Beeing sceptic is the most consious thing (Thats my POV), but some things are determined by natural aspect. You can still hold your belief, its your own right ...-- +++$+++ ::::I disagree, the word adjust is not the right one, if that's the case we all adjust the quotes somehow even without not recogniseing it (our mind functiones so), we all believe in something by the way, and we are learned in something... our conclusions come from there. Beeing sceptic is the most consious thing (Thats my POV), but some things are determined by natural aspect. You can still hold your belief, its your own right ...--[[User:Vlatkoto|Vlatko]] 22:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

14590 +++$+++ PassaMethod +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-24 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.308969720E09 +++$+++ Do you mind explaining [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Medina&diff=436006155&oldid=436001041 this] edit and why you think its incorrect?  +++$+++ Do you mind explaining [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Medina&diff=436006155&oldid=436001041 this] edit and why you think its incorrect? [[User:PassaMethod|<font color="grey" face="Tahoma">Pass a Method</font>]] [[User talk:PassaMethod|<font color="orange" face="papyrus">talk</font>]] 19:42, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14591 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.308970140E09 +++$+++ Self-explanatory, I think, based on Chem1's edit, which you didn't contradict. If you think Chem1's statement regarding factual accuracy is incorrect, you need to say so. If you want to pursue this it's a question for the article talk page. Please raise it there. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Self-explanatory, I think, based on Chem1's edit, which you didn't contradict. If you think Chem1's statement regarding factual accuracy is incorrect, you need to say so. If you want to pursue this it's a question for the article talk page. Please raise it there. Thanks. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 19:49, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
14592 +++$+++ PassaMethod +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ 14591 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.308986580E09 +++$+++ You're confused. My edit did not revert it to the original version. I changed the wording from \"places\" to \"cities\" to make it accurate. I would appreciate if you self-revert.  +++$+++ ::You're confused. My edit did not revert it to the original version. I changed the wording from "places" to "cities" to make it accurate. I would appreciate if you self-revert. [[User:PassaMethod|<font color="grey" face="Tahoma">Pass a Method</font>]] [[User talk:PassaMethod|<font color="orange" face="papyrus">talk</font>]] 00:23, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14593 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ 14592 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.309030980E09 +++$+++ You are right. I didn't notice that, for which I apologize. However, it does then caste doubt on the notability of the statement, and verges on weasel words. It probably should only be a statement that part of the Qu'ran was written in Medina. Also, looking again at the edit, I think \"revealed\" fails NPOV as that is clearly Muslim terminology. Because of that, I won't self-revert.  +++$+++ :::You are right. I didn't notice that, for which I apologize. However, it does then caste doubt on the notability of the statement, and verges on weasel words. It probably should only be a statement that part of the Qu'ran was written in Medina. Also, looking again at the edit, I think "revealed" fails NPOV as that is clearly Muslim terminology. Because of that, I won't self-revert. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 12:43, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14594 +++$+++ PassaMethod +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ 14593 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.309031520E09 +++$+++ In the Quran you have either the [[Medinan sura]] or the [[Meccan sura]]. This means that out of 114 chapters of the Quran half are either Meccan and the other half is Medinan. Don't you think this is notable enough to include?  +++$+++ ::::In the Quran you have either the [[Medinan sura]] or the [[Meccan sura]]. This means that out of 114 chapters of the Quran half are either Meccan and the other half is Medinan. Don't you think this is notable enough to include? [[User:PassaMethod|<font color="grey" face="Tahoma">Pass a Method</font>]] [[User talk:PassaMethod|<font color="orange" face="papyrus">talk</font>]] 12:52, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14595 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ 14594 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.309031580E09 +++$+++ Then what about Chem1's comment? Do you dispute what he is saying or not? I'm referring to the reference to \"one of two cities\" where it was revealed. Chem1 said that it was written in other places besides Mecca and Medina. To say that medina was one of the two cities, yet ther e wereother places where it was written isn't notable.  +++$+++ :::::Then what about Chem1's comment? Do you dispute what he is saying or not? I'm referring to the reference to "one of two cities" where it was revealed. Chem1 said that it was written in other places besides Mecca and Medina. To say that medina was one of the two cities, yet ther e wereother places where it was written isn't notable. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 12:53, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14596 +++$+++ PassaMethod +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ 14595 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.309032120E09 +++$+++ He's referring to outskirt areas which surround Mecca and Medina, but commentators still describe them as Mecca and Medina.  +++$+++ :::::: He's referring to outskirt areas which surround Mecca and Medina, but commentators still describe them as Mecca and Medina. [[User:PassaMethod|<font color="grey" face="Tahoma">Pass a Method</font>]] [[User talk:PassaMethod|<font color="orange" face="papyrus">talk</font>]] 13:02, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14597 +++$+++ PassaMethod +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ 14595 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.309032360E09 +++$+++ Maybe we could change the wording to say \"''Mecca and Medina and its surrounding outskirts are the only two places where the Quran was revealed.''\". Is that a good compromise? Check these refs which support my claims: [http:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?id=ZcMHD5WWL7AC&pg=PA26&dq=quran+revealed+medina+mecca&hl=en&ei=n9wFTvG7F8q68gPK2IHfDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false], [http:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?id=5ShMqiiJbNYC&pg=PA61&dq=quran+revealed+medina+mecca+surah&hl=en&ei=oOAFTry8H4as8gOv5-XpDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q&f=false]  +++$+++ :::::: Maybe we could change the wording to say "''Mecca and Medina and its surrounding outskirts are the only two places where the Quran was revealed.''". Is that a good compromise? Check these refs which support my claims: [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZcMHD5WWL7AC&pg=PA26&dq=quran+revealed+medina+mecca&hl=en&ei=n9wFTvG7F8q68gPK2IHfDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false], [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=5ShMqiiJbNYC&pg=PA61&dq=quran+revealed+medina+mecca+surah&hl=en&ei=oOAFTry8H4as8gOv5-XpDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q&f=false] [[User:PassaMethod|<font color="grey" face="Tahoma">Pass a Method</font>]] [[User talk:PassaMethod|<font color="orange" face="papyrus">talk</font>]] 13:06, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14598 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ 14597 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.309057080E09 +++$+++ Why not say that \"x sura of the Qu'ran was [revealed] in Medina\"? But we can't say \"revealed\" IMO. Do you have a more NPOV word  than revealed?  +++$+++ :::::::Why not say that "x sura of the Qu'ran was [revealed] in Medina"? But we can't say "revealed" IMO. Do you have a more NPOV word  than revealed? [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 19:58, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14599 +++$+++ PassaMethod +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ 14598 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.309063920E09 +++$+++ [[Medinan sura]] and [[Meccan sura]] both use the words \"''revealed''\" The references also use \"revealed\". I think revealed is better because the word \"composed\" implies the moment the Quran was compiled and written down after Muhammads death (which is a totally different event). +++$+++ :::::::: [[Medinan sura]] and [[Meccan sura]] both use the words "''revealed''" The references also use "revealed". I think revealed is better because the word "composed" implies the moment the Quran was compiled and written down after Muhammads death (which is a totally different event).[[User:PassaMethod|<font color="grey" face="Tahoma">Pass a Method</font>]] [[User talk:PassaMethod|<font color="orange" face="papyrus">talk</font>]] 21:52, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14600 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ 14599 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.309065300E09 +++$+++ No. \"Revealed\" means that Muhammad wasn't the author, but that God revealed it to Muhammad, who then transmitted God's word. That's not NPOV. I don't agree that \"composed\" means it was written afer his death. It has no connection with compiled. See the [http:\/\/oxforddictionaries.com\/definition\/compose OED online definition]. However, if you don't like \"composed\" then suggest another word. Whatever it is, it can't be \"revealed\". I would suggest \"written\" but i'm not sure that's correct. Isn't it the belief that Muhammad transmitted it orally in the first instance?  +++$+++ :::::::::No. "Revealed" means that Muhammad wasn't the author, but that God revealed it to Muhammad, who then transmitted God's word. That's not NPOV. I don't agree that "composed" means it was written afer his death. It has no connection with compiled. See the [http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/compose OED online definition]. However, if you don't like "composed" then suggest another word. Whatever it is, it can't be "revealed". I would suggest "written" but i'm not sure that's correct. Isn't it the belief that Muhammad transmitted it orally in the first instance? [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 22:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
14601 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14590 +++$+++ 14600 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.309065420E09 +++$+++ Further thought: I guess \"revealed\" is ok if the sentence begins \"Muslims believe that...\", and that would be the best formula anyway if the Qu'ran is the only primary source for where it was \"revealed\", which I believe is the case.   +++$+++ ::::::::::Further thought: I guess "revealed" is ok if the sentence begins "Muslims believe that...", and that would be the best formula anyway if the Qu'ran is the only primary source for where it was "revealed", which I believe is the case.  [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 22:17, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

276735 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-05 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.168068600E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the speedy close on the debate for the deletion of my User Page. Just so you know, my User Page is well within the User Page Guidelines (I encourage you to see for yourself), and that [[User:Opronc-oB|Opronc-oB]] is a sockpuppet of [[User:Opronc|Opronc]] and [[User:Opronc-oA|Opronc-oA]]. I am dealing with this User at the moment, so don't worry.  +++$+++ Thank you for the speedy close on the debate for the deletion of my User Page. Just so you know, my User Page is well within the User Page Guidelines (I encourage you to see for yourself), and that [[User:Opronc-oB|Opronc-oB]] is a sockpuppet of [[User:Opronc|Opronc]] and [[User:Opronc-oA|Opronc-oA]]. I am dealing with this User at the moment, so don't worry. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 23:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
276736 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276735 +++$+++ 276735 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.168072980E09 +++$+++ Heh, yeah, I found a bit about that afterward by following your history. De nada. -- +++$+++ :Heh, yeah, I found a bit about that afterward by following your history. De nada. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 00:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

276737 +++$+++ Wowaconia +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.168633680E09 +++$+++ I notice you said \u201cThe fact that Emanuel's father was in Irgun is reported in the WaPo and other sources so can be used; the accusation of participating in particular terrorist acts, though, is not sourced satisfactorily.\u201d I replied there, but as there is so much action on that page watchlisting it doesn\u2019t really tell you if someone responded on your particular thread. After your comment I wrote the following \"Actually the Washington Post only says he was a member of 'the pre-independence Israeli underground'. There is a big jump between 'the underground' and a paramilitary force - if you shelter Allied pilots in WWII France your part of the underground, that doesn't mean you took up arms against the Nazis. Had the post mentioned Irgun I would have just deleted the refs and quotes taken from the anti-Semitic blogs and quoted the WaPo about Irgun.\"-- +++$+++ I notice you said “The fact that Emanuel's father was in Irgun is reported in the WaPo and other sources so can be used; the accusation of participating in particular terrorist acts, though, is not sourced satisfactorily.” I replied there, but as there is so much action on that page watchlisting it doesn’t really tell you if someone responded on your particular thread. After your comment I wrote the following "Actually the Washington Post only says he was a member of 'the pre-independence Israeli underground'. There is a big jump between 'the underground' and a paramilitary force - if you shelter Allied pilots in WWII France your part of the underground, that doesn't mean you took up arms against the Nazis. Had the post mentioned Irgun I would have just deleted the refs and quotes taken from the anti-Semitic blogs and quoted the WaPo about Irgun."--[[User:Wowaconia|Wowaconia]] 12:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
276738 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276737 +++$+++ 276737 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.168647540E09 +++$+++ My bad memory, then. I had thought there was one such reference. -- +++$+++ :My bad memory, then. I had thought there was one such reference. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 16:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

276739 +++$+++ Jinian +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.168650840E09 +++$+++ Would you mind taking your subpages on the various USS Fultons out of the category \"United States Navy ships\"? They've been sitting there for a while and don't need to be. Thanks.  +++$+++ Would you mind taking your subpages on the various USS Fultons out of the category "United States Navy ships"? They've been sitting there for a while and don't need to be. Thanks. [[User:Jinian|Jinian]] 17:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
276740 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276739 +++$+++ 276739 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.168652340E09 +++$+++ Oh dear. I had forgotten all about those. At the time I didn't know about the <nowiki>[[:Category]]<\/nowiki> dodge, so fixed. And I'll polish them for mainspace shortly. -- +++$+++ :Oh dear. I had forgotten all about those. At the time I didn't know about the <nowiki>[[:Category]]</nowiki> dodge, so fixed. And I'll polish them for mainspace shortly. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 17:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

276741 +++$+++ 137.222.10.67 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.169161080E09 +++$+++ Hi, on a recent [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Le_Boom|AFD]] you said that [[WP:MUSIC]] is policy - just thought I'd let you know it's not. It's a criteria guideline, and as such you're perfectly allowed to ignore it (particularly when AFD is supposedly a discussion) :) - +++$+++ Hi, on a recent [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Le_Boom|AFD]] you said that [[WP:MUSIC]] is policy - just thought I'd let you know it's not. It's a criteria guideline, and as such you're perfectly allowed to ignore it (particularly when AFD is supposedly a discussion) :) -[[User:137.222.10.67|137.222.10.67]] 14:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
276742 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276741 +++$+++ 276741 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.169167260E09 +++$+++ Oh, I know it's a guideline. But read again. I did not say \"that WP:MUSIC is policy\", I said that one should cite policy in an argument, meaning as opposed to popularity. I'll make a popularity argument at times myself but always in conjunction with a particular policy or guideline. I suppose I should have said \"policy or guideline\" in that line, but I was trying to be succinct. -- +++$+++ :Oh, I know it's a guideline. But read again. I did not say "that WP:MUSIC is policy", I said that one should cite policy in an argument, meaning as opposed to popularity. I'll make a popularity argument at times myself but always in conjunction with a particular policy or guideline. I suppose I should have said "policy or guideline" in that line, but I was trying to be succinct. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 16:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

276743 +++$+++ Tony Fox +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-20 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.169302800E09 +++$+++ THANK you for your comment on the [[The Lee Nysted Experience]] AfD. You said what I'd been trying to get across far clearer than I've managed to. Hopefully, the SPAs working on that will realize what's going on now. Cheers.  +++$+++ THANK you for your comment on the [[The Lee Nysted Experience]] AfD. You said what I'd been trying to get across far clearer than I've managed to. Hopefully, the SPAs working on that will realize what's going on now. Cheers. [[User:Tony Fox|Tony Fox]] <small>[[User_talk:Tony Fox|(arf!)]]</small> 06:20, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
276744 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276743 +++$+++ 276743 +++$+++ 2007-01-21 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.169380140E09 +++$+++ Great! I'm glad my pulling my hair out for an hour before replying helped two people, heh. Alas, as usual, they're probably just too close to the subject to get it. -- +++$+++ :Great! I'm glad my pulling my hair out for an hour before replying helped two people, heh. Alas, as usual, they're probably just too close to the subject to get it. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 03:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

276745 +++$+++ GabrielF +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-21 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.169374800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:GabrielF|GabrielF]] 02:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
276746 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276745 +++$+++ 276745 +++$+++ 2007-01-21 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.169380380E09 +++$+++ Good start. Better title. (I belatedly realized that \"academic intimidation\" could sound like \"academics doing the intimidation\" or worse, intimidation that was only \"academic\" ...) Anyway, although it obviously needs expansion, I think you hit the major points. -- +++$+++ :Good start. Better title. (I belatedly realized that "academic intimidation" could sound like "academics doing the intimidation" or worse, intimidation that was only "academic" ...) Anyway, although it obviously needs expansion, I think you hit the major points. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 03:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
276747 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276745 +++$+++ 276745 +++$+++ 2007-01-21 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.169382240E09 +++$+++ Hm, personally, I think rebooting the discussion just makes things messy. Additionally there is no reason to vote on the name of the article; let it survive then let the page's interested editors choose a name by consensus. If you think the article should stay you can simply ''withdraw'' the nomination. Simplest, cleanest. If you still think consensus is needed, you only have two editors who put in delete votes. -- +++$+++ :Hm, personally, I think rebooting the discussion just makes things messy. Additionally there is no reason to vote on the name of the article; let it survive then let the page's interested editors choose a name by consensus. If you think the article should stay you can simply ''withdraw'' the nomination. Simplest, cleanest. If you still think consensus is needed, you only have two editors who put in delete votes. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 04:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
276748 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276745 +++$+++ 276745 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.169557980E09 +++$+++ The closing administrator will decide. I don't think you have much of a shot, personally. Going around insulting and ranting at people is not a way to persuade, I suggest you think about that. -- +++$+++ :The closing administrator will decide. I don't think you have much of a shot, personally. Going around insulting and ranting at people is not a way to persuade, I suggest you think about that. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 05:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

14602 +++$+++ PassaMethod +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-26 08:16:00 +++$+++ 1.309101360E09 +++$+++ What if we rewrite the whole sentence and write \"''The Quran is divided into [[Meccan sura]]s and [[Medinan sura]]s''\" ?  +++$+++ What if we rewrite the whole sentence and write "''The Quran is divided into [[Meccan sura]]s and [[Medinan sura]]s''" ? [[User:PassaMethod|<font color="grey" face="Tahoma">Pass a Method</font>]] [[User talk:PassaMethod|<font color="orange" face="papyrus">talk</font>]] 08:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
14603 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14602 +++$+++ 14602 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.309134900E09 +++$+++ Not really. The article isn't about the Qu'ran, which that would sound like. what was wrong with \"Muslims believe...\"? It's NPOV but not contrary to Islam. Btw, this should really take place on the article Talk page, so that others can seen what was agreed etc.  +++$+++ :Not really. The article isn't about the Qu'ran, which that would sound like. what was wrong with "Muslims believe..."? It's NPOV but not contrary to Islam. Btw, this should really take place on the article Talk page, so that others can seen what was agreed etc. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 17:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

14604 +++$+++ Skol fir +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.309327980E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Skol fir|Skol fir]] ([[User talk:Skol fir|talk]]) 23:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
14605 +++$+++ Skol fir +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14604 +++$+++ 14604 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.309383180E09 +++$+++ If I asked the wrong person, please let me know, so I can try somewhere else for help on this issue. Also, please let me know if this issue has been resolved at some other discussion besides [[Talk:House_of_Windsor#SHSG_Part_III]]. I personally have no opinion on this matter. I just don't see how the House of Windsor is connected with the House of Gl\xfccksburg, while {{user|Emerson 07}} insists this is a fact. Where is the evidence? -- +++$+++ :If I asked the wrong person, please let me know, so I can try somewhere else for help on this issue. Also, please let me know if this issue has been resolved at some other discussion besides [[Talk:House_of_Windsor#SHSG_Part_III]]. I personally have no opinion on this matter. I just don't see how the House of Windsor is connected with the House of Glücksburg, while {{user|Emerson 07}} insists this is a fact. Where is the evidence? --[[User:Skol fir|Skol fir]] ([[User talk:Skol fir|talk]]) 14:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

264578 +++$+++ Jayron32 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-28 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.233201420E09 +++$+++ He's been rather obviously abusing sockpuppet accounts as \"Good Hand\/Bad Hand\" accounts where one account vandalises an article and another cleans it up.  He was blocked when an Autoblock showed that the SAME articles were being vandalised by one account, and then his account was cleaning them up.  Being caught by an autoblock in this manner shows that the same IP address was responsible for both vandalising the same articles and cleaning them up.  He also sent some emails which implied that you were abusing your admin power in declining his unblock request.  See [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Spidermancnichols]], which was the account that when blocked activated the Autoblock against Edito*Magica, as well as the suspicious [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Edito*Magica]].  He claims innocence in the matter, and I told him that if he wanted to edit, he should contact ArbCom.  Please block his new accounts as a violation of Wikipedia policy.  He should contact ArbCom and follow the rules if he wants to edit.  I see no evidence of wanting to abide by the rules, and the continued abuse of multiple accounts seems rediculous.  -- +++$+++ He's been rather obviously abusing sockpuppet accounts as "Good Hand/Bad Hand" accounts where one account vandalises an article and another cleans it up.  He was blocked when an Autoblock showed that the SAME articles were being vandalised by one account, and then his account was cleaning them up.  Being caught by an autoblock in this manner shows that the same IP address was responsible for both vandalising the same articles and cleaning them up.  He also sent some emails which implied that you were abusing your admin power in declining his unblock request.  See [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Spidermancnichols]], which was the account that when blocked activated the Autoblock against Edito*Magica, as well as the suspicious [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Edito*Magica]].  He claims innocence in the matter, and I told him that if he wanted to edit, he should contact ArbCom.  Please block his new accounts as a violation of Wikipedia policy.  He should contact ArbCom and follow the rules if he wants to edit.  I see no evidence of wanting to abide by the rules, and the continued abuse of multiple accounts seems rediculous.  --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 19:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
264579 +++$+++ Jayron32 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264578 +++$+++ 264578 +++$+++ 2009-01-29 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.233228480E09 +++$+++ Well, looks like evertone else got to it before me... Anyhoo, this guy knows he's supposed to email ArbCom to plead his case, but I can't see that going well for him.  If he just continues to create new accounts, he will continue to be blocked until he follows the rules.  -- +++$+++ :Well, looks like evertone else got to it before me... Anyhoo, this guy knows he's supposed to email ArbCom to plead his case, but I can't see that going well for him.  If he just continues to create new accounts, he will continue to be blocked until he follows the rules.  --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 03:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
264580 +++$+++ $$$Marlon$$$30 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264578 +++$+++ 264578 +++$+++ 2009-01-29 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.233217800E09 +++$+++ Well, now is a bit better, still need some improvement and images \xbfIt's enough to not be erased? -- +++$+++ *Well, now is a bit better, still need some improvement and images ¿It's enough to not be erased? --[[User:$$$Marlon$$$30|$$$Marlon$$$30]] ([[User talk:$$$Marlon$$$30|talk]]) 00:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
264581 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264578 +++$+++ 264578 +++$+++ 2009-01-29 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.233285480E09 +++$+++ That's fine now, thanks. You never know about new pages... some people put minimal content and run away! I usually draft an article in user space (e.g. [[User:The JPS\/sandbox]]) before creating in mainspace.  +++$+++ :That's fine now, thanks. You never know about new pages... some people put minimal content and run away! I usually draft an article in user space (e.g. [[User:The JPS/sandbox]]) before creating in mainspace. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 19:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

538894 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-01 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.151806740E09 +++$+++ Hi, could you please go through [http:\/\/www.nsi.bg\/Census\/Census.htm this] and tell me how many Greeks were recorded in Bulgaria in the latest census (2001). I don't understand it :p Thanks. -- +++$+++ Hi, could you please go through [http://www.nsi.bg/Census/Census.htm this] and tell me how many Greeks were recorded in Bulgaria in the latest census (2001). I don't understand it :p Thanks. --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 19:19, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
538895 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538894 +++$+++ 538894 +++$+++ 2006-07-01 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.151810700E09 +++$+++ Thanks. -- +++$+++ :Thanks. --[[User:Telex|Tēlex]] 20:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

276753 +++$+++ DavidJacques +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-27 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.169910840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your support in keeping the [[Customer experience]] entry, and the extra work in searching for the word on the New York Times. --  +++$+++ Thanks for your support in keeping the [[Customer experience]] entry, and the extra work in searching for the word on the New York Times. -- [[User:DavidJacques|DavidJacques]] 07:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
276754 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276753 +++$+++ 276753 +++$+++ 2007-01-27 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.169911200E09 +++$+++ Hi. There isn't any need to campaign and it can hurt your cause, just so you know. I do have one recommendation, that you explicitly grant Wikipedia permission to use your words under the GFDL as your intent seems to be (based on [[Talk:Customer experience]]). Go to [[Wikipedia:Example requests for permission]] and follow the steps to send in a \"response\" to the permissions e-mail address. This e-mail should come from customerinput.com. Alternatively, you could change the notice on [http:\/\/www.customerinput.com\/journal\/010405.asp] from \"Copyright 2005 All Rights Reserved\" to \"Licensed under the [[GFDL]]\". This would help to resolve the copyright dispute. It doesn't look to me like you've done anything wrong in putting your own words on Wikipedia, but you've created suspicion by using the same words you have elsewhere under copyright. -- +++$+++ :Hi. There isn't any need to campaign and it can hurt your cause, just so you know. I do have one recommendation, that you explicitly grant Wikipedia permission to use your words under the GFDL as your intent seems to be (based on [[Talk:Customer experience]]). Go to [[Wikipedia:Example requests for permission]] and follow the steps to send in a "response" to the permissions e-mail address. This e-mail should come from customerinput.com. Alternatively, you could change the notice on [http://www.customerinput.com/journal/010405.asp] from "Copyright 2005 All Rights Reserved" to "Licensed under the [[GFDL]]". This would help to resolve the copyright dispute. It doesn't look to me like you've done anything wrong in putting your own words on Wikipedia, but you've created suspicion by using the same words you have elsewhere under copyright. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 07:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
276755 +++$+++ DavidJacques +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276753 +++$+++ 276754 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.170072300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your suggestion. I looked at the page and cannot seem to find the \"response\" instructions. Perhaps you could suggest where to look? I've also read theeh GFDL information thoroughly, and will consider placing the original text under a GFDL License. I have also started on additional text to make the definition more comprehensive, in the context of competitive differentiation. Kind regards, --  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your suggestion. I looked at the page and cannot seem to find the "response" instructions. Perhaps you could suggest where to look? I've also read theeh GFDL information thoroughly, and will consider placing the original text under a GFDL License. I have also started on additional text to make the definition more comprehensive, in the context of competitive differentiation. Kind regards, -- [[User:DavidJacques|DavidJacques]] 04:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

14610 +++$+++ Shoplifter +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14610 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311362460E09 +++$+++ I came across this article while adding the Saudi template to pages using AWB; thought you'd might want to merge it with the legal system article (it's an orphan, after all).  +++$+++ I came across this article while adding the Saudi template to pages using AWB; thought you'd might want to merge it with the legal system article (it's an orphan, after all). [[User:Shoplifter|Shoplifter]] ([[User talk:Shoplifter|talk]]) 12:21, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
14611 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14610 +++$+++ 14610 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311370440E09 +++$+++ Thanks yes. thought I'd found all the Saudi law articles.  +++$+++ :Thanks yes. thought I'd found all the Saudi law articles. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 14:34, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

538899 +++$+++ Uvouvo +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538899 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-03 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.151924160E09 +++$+++ I have had a problem with user:Luka Jacov editing in the way he has recently. I basically made 90% of the edits required for that article to become featured. (which he indirectly takes credit for by mentioning that he has authored 1 featured article in his user box). Luka nominated it a number of times when it was clearly not ready. The article had a peer review both directly and indirectly during the FA process of which many things were agreed to i.e. the usage of a short overview or introduction, removal and incorporation of the trivia section into the text etc. Luka Jacov has unilaterally reverted many of our edits which have benefitted the article to his own versions. I am glad that I am in the majority in regards with my outlook on edits on this article and what is required. Thank you Todor Bozhinov for being interested enough to edit this article which overall benefits the description of the place of mine own ancestry. Also, the lastovo-karta map luka posted is a rip off from a comercial website of the Lastovo diving centre - \"Ronilacki Raj\". On that map you can even see the diving sites represented around the island which in my opinion is very unprofessional. I actually uploaded the pasadur.jpg file which is an official picture from the lastovo tourism office (I guess from the Croatian government). I wasnt sure of licensing rights so I put the wrong license information, so if you could help me a little with image licensing as i am not sure what is correct. Another thing worth mentioning is that it seems all Lastovo websites out there seem to be \"borrowing\" each others photos including official ones from the government.  +++$+++ I have had a problem with user:Luka Jacov editing in the way he has recently. I basically made 90% of the edits required for that article to become featured. (which he indirectly takes credit for by mentioning that he has authored 1 featured article in his user box). Luka nominated it a number of times when it was clearly not ready. The article had a peer review both directly and indirectly during the FA process of which many things were agreed to i.e. the usage of a short overview or introduction, removal and incorporation of the trivia section into the text etc. Luka Jacov has unilaterally reverted many of our edits which have benefitted the article to his own versions. I am glad that I am in the majority in regards with my outlook on edits on this article and what is required. Thank you Todor Bozhinov for being interested enough to edit this article which overall benefits the description of the place of mine own ancestry. Also, the lastovo-karta map luka posted is a rip off from a comercial website of the Lastovo diving centre - "Ronilacki Raj". On that map you can even see the diving sites represented around the island which in my opinion is very unprofessional. I actually uploaded the pasadur.jpg file which is an official picture from the lastovo tourism office (I guess from the Croatian government). I wasnt sure of licensing rights so I put the wrong license information, so if you could help me a little with image licensing as i am not sure what is correct. Another thing worth mentioning is that it seems all Lastovo websites out there seem to be "borrowing" each others photos including official ones from the government. [[User:Uvouvo|Uvouvo]] 03:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
538900 +++$+++ Uvouvo +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538899 +++$+++ 538899 +++$+++ 2006-07-03 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.151924340E09 +++$+++ Oh and i forgot to mention, if you wanted any last minute edits to the article or help before it is placed on the main page then please let me know. I would be more than happy throwing in some effort  +++$+++ * Oh and i forgot to mention, if you wanted any last minute edits to the article or help before it is placed on the main page then please let me know. I would be more than happy throwing in some effort [[User:Uvouvo|Uvouvo]] 03:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

14612 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14612 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311961140E09 +++$+++ Maybe it would be clearer if you retracted your post, and added your name to mine....  ?   +++$+++ Maybe it would be clearer if you retracted your post, and added your name to mine....  ?  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 10:39, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
14613 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14612 +++$+++ 14612 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.311961380E09 +++$+++ Fixed it now by correcting first post!  +++$+++ :Fixed it now by correcting first post! [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 10:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
14614 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14612 +++$+++ 14613 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311961560E09 +++$+++ But it still looks as though Deano545 is reporting you (which is what I first thought).  <small>Hope you don't mix up the accuser and accused in court!!<\/small>   +++$+++ ::But it still looks as though Deano545 is reporting you (which is what I first thought).  <small>Hope you don't mix up the accuser and accused in court!!</small>  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 10:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
14615 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14612 +++$+++ 14614 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311961860E09 +++$+++ Completely missed that!!! Thanks. I've fixed it now. D'oh.  +++$+++ :::Completely missed that!!! Thanks. I've fixed it now. D'oh. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 10:51, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
14616 +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14612 +++$+++ 14615 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.311962220E09 +++$+++ Now I understand post above and have deleted my report! I think I should just go back to bed... +++$+++ ::::Now I understand post above and have deleted my report! I think I should just go back to bed...[[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa#top|talk]]) 10:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
14617 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ DeCausa +++$+++ 14612 +++$+++ 14616 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.311962220E09 +++$+++ No probs - happens to all of us!   +++$+++ :::::No probs - happens to all of us!  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] ([[User talk:Ghmyrtle|talk]]) 10:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

276761 +++$+++ Royalguard11 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-06 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.170751380E09 +++$+++ Please put new discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Real Social Dynamics (2nd nomination)]], and not an old archive. Thank you. -[[User:Royalguard11|Royalguard11]]<small>([[User talk:Royalguard11|Talk]]\xb7[[User talk:Royalguard11\/Desk|Desk]]\xb7 +++$+++ Please put new discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Social Dynamics (2nd nomination)]], and not an old archive. Thank you. -[[User:Royalguard11|Royalguard11]]<small>([[User talk:Royalguard11|Talk]]·[[User talk:Royalguard11/Desk|Desk]]·[[User:Royalguard11/ER|Review Me!]])</small> 00:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
276762 +++$+++ Royalguard11 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276761 +++$+++ 276761 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.170761520E09 +++$+++ Sorry, you're just never suppose to edit an afd archive if your making a new nomination. The proceedure with renominating involves using a different page (so whoever started the re-nom must have just forgotten to read it). I just wanted to make sure that everyone who was involved in the new discussion knew where it was being moved. -[[User:Royalguard11|Royalguard11]]<small>([[User talk:Royalguard11|Talk]]\xb7[[User talk:Royalguard11\/Desk|Desk]]\xb7 +++$+++ :Sorry, you're just never suppose to edit an afd archive if your making a new nomination. The proceedure with renominating involves using a different page (so whoever started the re-nom must have just forgotten to read it). I just wanted to make sure that everyone who was involved in the new discussion knew where it was being moved. -[[User:Royalguard11|Royalguard11]]<small>([[User talk:Royalguard11|Talk]]·[[User talk:Royalguard11/Desk|Desk]]·[[User:Royalguard11/ER|Review Me!]])</small> 03:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

276764 +++$+++ Benjiwolf +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-06 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.170819720E09 +++$+++ no i firmly disagree with the deletion of the page...it is not easy to find any info on colleen shipman just yet on the net...yet it is going to come flooding in... u betcha... in the next couple of days...we will be able to vastly expand the article...and i think its fair play too...as we need to see more of the more sane woman in this sensational story...[[Lisa Nowak]]s page is being hit like lightning...if u want to edit it u have to type fast or someone else has already changed it...to see more of the stalkee is fair play unless u are propsing to eliminate lisa's page (the stalkers page) as well...it made me think instantly of silence of the lambs it did...shipman...mrs lipman...it was sort of eeiry... +++$+++ no i firmly disagree with the deletion of the page...it is not easy to find any info on colleen shipman just yet on the net...yet it is going to come flooding in... u betcha... in the next couple of days...we will be able to vastly expand the article...and i think its fair play too...as we need to see more of the more sane woman in this sensational story...[[Lisa Nowak]]s page is being hit like lightning...if u want to edit it u have to type fast or someone else has already changed it...to see more of the stalkee is fair play unless u are propsing to eliminate lisa's page (the stalkers page) as well...it made me think instantly of silence of the lambs it did...shipman...mrs lipman...it was sort of eeiry...[[User:Benjiwolf|Benjiwolf]] 19:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
276765 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276764 +++$+++ 276764 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.170826080E09 +++$+++ Hi. Please read our [[WP:BIO]] guidelines and our [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] policy. There is no reason for Wikipedia to satisfy prurient curiosity about a crime victim. In any case, an administrator has deleted and protected the page, which I believe was proper. -- +++$+++ :Hi. Please read our [[WP:BIO]] guidelines and our [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] policy. There is no reason for Wikipedia to satisfy prurient curiosity about a crime victim. In any case, an administrator has deleted and protected the page, which I believe was proper. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 21:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

14622 +++$+++ Lemurbaby +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ 14622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.311189480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the pass on [[Ranavalona III]] and the kudos for the [[Malagasy cuisine]] FA (so happy!). Now that I've gone through it once, I feel more confident about doing it again and plan to try next with a FA nomination for [[Rova of Antananarivo]] in a couple of weeks. But in the meantime, the next GA project will be [[Madagascar]]. I'll keep you posted as it gets closer to being nominated. I'm going to try to basically write it at FA level so it can get there sooner rather than later.  +++$+++ Thanks for the pass on [[Ranavalona III]] and the kudos for the [[Malagasy cuisine]] FA (so happy!). Now that I've gone through it once, I feel more confident about doing it again and plan to try next with a FA nomination for [[Rova of Antananarivo]] in a couple of weeks. But in the meantime, the next GA project will be [[Madagascar]]. I'll keep you posted as it gets closer to being nominated. I'm going to try to basically write it at FA level so it can get there sooner rather than later. [[User:Lemurbaby|Lemurbaby]] ([[User talk:Lemurbaby|talk]]) 12:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
14623 +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ 14622 +++$+++ 14622 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311189660E09 +++$+++ Sounds like a good plan.  I'm very eager to see [[Madagascar]] at GA or higher. \u2013&nbsp;''' +++$+++ :Sounds like a good plan.  I'm very eager to see [[Madagascar]] at GA or higher. –&nbsp;'''[[User:Visionholder|<span style="color:darkgreen">VisionHolder</span>]] «[[User talk:Visionholder|<span style="color:olive">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</span>]]»''' 12:21, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

14624 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ 14624 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.311622920E09 +++$+++ Not sure why you are wasting time putting citation needed tags on start class articles, which by definition still need citations (minimum WP criteria for rating as start is four paragraphs, no citations), unless you doubt the statements (I haven't checked them either, but assume good faith on the part of whoever wrote them). Then again, it's your time to waste. The new material I added, I took directly from the citation. I don't make things up, so it should all be supported even if it is differently organized. If you have additional information, perhaps you could add it? If you add URLs, I can turn them into citations. If you dispute the information, that should be discussed on the talk page.  +++$+++ Not sure why you are wasting time putting citation needed tags on start class articles, which by definition still need citations (minimum WP criteria for rating as start is four paragraphs, no citations), unless you doubt the statements (I haven't checked them either, but assume good faith on the part of whoever wrote them). Then again, it's your time to waste. The new material I added, I took directly from the citation. I don't make things up, so it should all be supported even if it is differently organized. If you have additional information, perhaps you could add it? If you add URLs, I can turn them into citations. If you dispute the information, that should be discussed on the talk page. [[User:Donlammers|Don Lammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers|talk]]) 12:42, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
14625 +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ 14624 +++$+++ 14624 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311640200E09 +++$+++ As for me adding information and information\/citations to the article or otherwise improving it, honestly, I've made an offer to the DLC staff to write the article, but their support and cooperation has been far from enthusiastic.  They have archives of newsletters that I could work from to cover the history of the facility, but I have yet to get my hands on them.  Furthermore, I've already had an encounter with one of the staff members who demanded that I remove information from Wiki about one of their [[Golden-crowned sifaka#Conservation|failed colonies]].  (Everything was fully sourced and even passed [[WP:FAC|FAC]].)  When I told them that I couldn't and emphasized that I had written the material in a conservation-oriented tone, and noted that other editors using the same sources could take an entirely different (and unfavorable tone), they didn't care.  Unfortunately, it's been indicated that my refusal to cooperate on this issue is one of the reasons I've been told to not apply for jobs there.  Needless to say, if I wrote this article, I would treat it like all my other high-end articles\u2014it would be comprehensive, and would include detailed mention of their failed colonies... whether they like it or not.  I still volunteer at the facility, so for now I'm mostly avoiding the article to avoid further heated conflicts.  All I do now is monitor the article to make sure the DLC staff or some good-intentioned fan does not turn the article into an advert or redirect to their main website or Facebook page... in addition to monitoring for vandalism, as usual.  \u2013&nbsp;''' +++$+++ :As for me adding information and information/citations to the article or otherwise improving it, honestly, I've made an offer to the DLC staff to write the article, but their support and cooperation has been far from enthusiastic.  They have archives of newsletters that I could work from to cover the history of the facility, but I have yet to get my hands on them.  Furthermore, I've already had an encounter with one of the staff members who demanded that I remove information from Wiki about one of their [[Golden-crowned sifaka#Conservation|failed colonies]].  (Everything was fully sourced and even passed [[WP:FAC|FAC]].)  When I told them that I couldn't and emphasized that I had written the material in a conservation-oriented tone, and noted that other editors using the same sources could take an entirely different (and unfavorable tone), they didn't care.  Unfortunately, it's been indicated that my refusal to cooperate on this issue is one of the reasons I've been told to not apply for jobs there.  Needless to say, if I wrote this article, I would treat it like all my other high-end articles—it would be comprehensive, and would include detailed mention of their failed colonies... whether they like it or not.  I still volunteer at the facility, so for now I'm mostly avoiding the article to avoid further heated conflicts.  All I do now is monitor the article to make sure the DLC staff or some good-intentioned fan does not turn the article into an advert or redirect to their main website or Facebook page... in addition to monitoring for vandalism, as usual.  –&nbsp;'''[[User:Visionholder|<span style="color:darkgreen">VisionHolder</span>]] «[[User talk:Visionholder|<span style="color:olive">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</span>]]»''' 17:30, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
14626 +++$+++ Donlammers +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ 14624 +++$+++ 14624 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.311667740E09 +++$+++ It sounds like we are in basic agreement (except I figure that any reader that can't figure out something isn't cited is a couple of oars short). Quite frankly, I don't really know what a \"releasable\" building is (though I can guess from the context), or particularly a \"semi-releasable\" building (and that one is not obvious from the article context). I primarily monitor zoo articles, but I am not a zoo professional -- I'm a technical writer with a young son who is a freak for animals. Insiders either trying to remove content they don't like, or add advertising-like content, are a constant problem (which is why thus far I have avoided approaching organizations I write about directly). My motivation on this article was simply to move it from stub to start -- I may come back to it eventually, but unless someone else edits it (at which point I will at least check to see what they did) this is not likely to be soon. I have just done a bit of copy editing because I found some spelling errors, and I removed the \"releasable\" and \"semi-releasable\". The first is actually explained in the text so it doesn't need to be \"named\", and the second I don't know what it really means, so it's probably best left alone. Cheers  +++$+++ :It sounds like we are in basic agreement (except I figure that any reader that can't figure out something isn't cited is a couple of oars short). Quite frankly, I don't really know what a "releasable" building is (though I can guess from the context), or particularly a "semi-releasable" building (and that one is not obvious from the article context). I primarily monitor zoo articles, but I am not a zoo professional -- I'm a technical writer with a young son who is a freak for animals. Insiders either trying to remove content they don't like, or add advertising-like content, are a constant problem (which is why thus far I have avoided approaching organizations I write about directly). My motivation on this article was simply to move it from stub to start -- I may come back to it eventually, but unless someone else edits it (at which point I will at least check to see what they did) this is not likely to be soon. I have just done a bit of copy editing because I found some spelling errors, and I removed the "releasable" and "semi-releasable". The first is actually explained in the text so it doesn't need to be "named", and the second I don't know what it really means, so it's probably best left alone. Cheers [[User:Donlammers|Don Lammers]] ([[User talk:Donlammers|talk]]) 01:09, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

276769 +++$+++ EnsRedShirt +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-21 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.172060640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for all the work you put into getting more sources for the article.   +++$+++ Thanks for all the work you put into getting more sources for the article.  [[User:EnsRedShirt|EnsRedShirt]] 04:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
276770 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276769 +++$+++ 276769 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.172060940E09 +++$+++ Hey, no problem! I had seen this once before online (probably Roadside America), so when I saw the article I knew it should be saved if possible. I kinda get a kick out of saving articles from the chopping block. ;-) -- +++$+++ :Hey, no problem! I had seen this once before online (probably Roadside America), so when I saw the article I knew it should be saved if possible. I kinda get a kick out of saving articles from the chopping block. ;-) --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 04:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

14627 +++$+++ Lemurbaby +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ 14627 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311792360E09 +++$+++ I just listed [[Rova of Antananarivo]] at FAC but NikkiMaria is already opposing for \"prose issues\" that I find minor. Hopefully she will realize this too. But if you do have time to have a look and weigh in I would appreciate your perspective. The FAC is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/Rova_of_Antananarivo\/archive2#Rova_of_Antananarivo here].  +++$+++ I just listed [[Rova of Antananarivo]] at FAC but NikkiMaria is already opposing for "prose issues" that I find minor. Hopefully she will realize this too. But if you do have time to have a look and weigh in I would appreciate your perspective. The FAC is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Rova_of_Antananarivo/archive2#Rova_of_Antananarivo here]. [[User:Lemurbaby|Lemurbaby]] ([[User talk:Lemurbaby|talk]]) 11:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14628 +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ 14627 +++$+++ 14627 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311812760E09 +++$+++ I saw it last night, and I hope to do a review sometime this week.  I'm not sure what the opposition is about, so you'll just have to wait for the response.  I know you frequently make significant changes to articles after I review them at GAN, so there could be major issues that I'm not aware of.  That and FAC often gets stricter and tougher as time progresses.  My first FAs would never pass FAC in their current state.  It's a matter of learning the standards, and continuing to adapt as things change.  You are doing the right thing by addressing their issues promptly and asking for clarification on how best to proceed. \u2013&nbsp;''' +++$+++ :I saw it last night, and I hope to do a review sometime this week.  I'm not sure what the opposition is about, so you'll just have to wait for the response.  I know you frequently make significant changes to articles after I review them at GAN, so there could be major issues that I'm not aware of.  That and FAC often gets stricter and tougher as time progresses.  My first FAs would never pass FAC in their current state.  It's a matter of learning the standards, and continuing to adapt as things change.  You are doing the right thing by addressing their issues promptly and asking for clarification on how best to proceed. –&nbsp;'''[[User:Visionholder|<span style="color:darkgreen">VisionHolder</span>]] «[[User talk:Visionholder|<span style="color:olive">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</span>]]»''' 17:26, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
14629 +++$+++ Lemurbaby +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ 14627 +++$+++ 14628 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.312173240E09 +++$+++ Thanks. She has now struck the Oppose, so the FAC is progressing in the right direction. Most likely the three support votes are all that will be needed now.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. She has now struck the Oppose, so the FAC is progressing in the right direction. Most likely the three support votes are all that will be needed now. [[User:Lemurbaby|Lemurbaby]] ([[User talk:Lemurbaby|talk]]) 21:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

276773 +++$+++ TBC +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.172229180E09 +++$+++ Great job on expanding the [[stay the course]] article, especially with the \"Origins\" section. :)--''' +++$+++ Great job on expanding the [[stay the course]] article, especially with the "Origins" section. :)--'''[[User:TBC|<font color="#007BA7">TBC</font>]]<big>Φ</big>[[User talk:TBC|<font color="#007BA7">talk?</font>]]''' 03:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
276774 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276773 +++$+++ 276773 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.172229660E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I'm glad you like it. ---- |  +++$+++ :Thanks! I'm glad you like it. ---- | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 03:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

14631 +++$+++ LittleJerry +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ 14631 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.312368720E09 +++$+++ Out of curiosity, when you work on the article do you intend to bring it to GA status?  +++$+++ Out of curiosity, when you work on the article do you intend to bring it to GA status? [[User:LittleJerry|LittleJerry]] ([[User talk:LittleJerry|talk]]) 03:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
14632 +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ Visionholder +++$+++ 14631 +++$+++ 14631 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.312369200E09 +++$+++ When (and if, at this point) I work on the article, I plan to get it to GA and eventually FA status.  Like I've said, I'm incredibly backlogged, but hoping that I can turn it into a collaborative effort with a few other experienced editors.  My only concern is that because the article gets so much traffic, and because interest is dominated by a mostly legal pet trade, I fear edit wars will break out over the article.  But at this point, I'm looking at next year at the earliest... if not later.... much later.  Sorry.  I'm doing the best I can. \u2013&nbsp;''' +++$+++ :When (and if, at this point) I work on the article, I plan to get it to GA and eventually FA status.  Like I've said, I'm incredibly backlogged, but hoping that I can turn it into a collaborative effort with a few other experienced editors.  My only concern is that because the article gets so much traffic, and because interest is dominated by a mostly legal pet trade, I fear edit wars will break out over the article.  But at this point, I'm looking at next year at the earliest... if not later.... much later.  Sorry.  I'm doing the best I can. –&nbsp;'''[[User:Visionholder|<span style="color:darkgreen">VisionHolder</span>]] «[[User talk:Visionholder|<span style="color:olive">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</span>]]»''' 04:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

14635 +++$+++ Allen3 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-26 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.240770360E09 +++$+++ Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content{{#if:NewsOne|, as you did to [[:NewsOne]]}}. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect]] it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been [[Wikipedia:How to spot vandalism|vandalised]], please [[Wikipedia:How to revert a page to an earlier version|revert]] it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|edit]] the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]] for how to proceed.<!-- Template:Blank -->  --'' +++$+++ Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content{{#if:NewsOne|, as you did to [[:NewsOne]]}}. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect]] it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been [[Wikipedia:How to spot vandalism|vandalised]], please [[Wikipedia:How to revert a page to an earlier version|revert]] it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|edit]] the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]] for how to proceed.<!-- Template:Blank -->  --''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 11:26, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
14636 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14635 +++$+++ 14635 +++$+++ 2009-04-26 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.240784640E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Will do.  +++$+++ :Thank you. Will do. [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] ([[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev#top|talk]]) 15:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

14637 +++$+++ Eightofnine +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14637 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-04 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.241438760E09 +++$+++ A [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation|request for mediation]] has been filed with the [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee|Mediation Committee]] that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation\/Hockey players]], and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to [[Wikipedia:Mediation]]. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks,  +++$+++ A [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation|request for mediation]] has been filed with the [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee|Mediation Committee]] that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Hockey players]], and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to [[Wikipedia:Mediation]]. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, [[User:Eightofnine|Eightofnine]] ([[User talk:Eightofnine|talk]]) 05:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
14638 +++$+++ Ryan Postlethwaite +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14637 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-04 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.241474400E09 +++$+++ ''For the Mediation Committee,'' ''' +++$+++ ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' '''[[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|<font color="green">Ryan</font> <font color="purple">Postlethwaite</font>]]''' 15:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

14639 +++$+++ Craitman17 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-12 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.242145260E09 +++$+++ If you are going to \"update\" articles on previous [[UEFA Regions' Cup]]s, can you please actually use valid information rather than vandalism? Thanks,  +++$+++ If you are going to "update" articles on previous [[UEFA Regions' Cup]]s, can you please actually use valid information rather than vandalism? Thanks, [[User:Craitman17|Ը२ձւե๓ձռ]]<sup>''[[User_talk:Craitman17|17]]''</sup> 09:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
14640 +++$+++ Craitman17 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14639 +++$+++ 14639 +++$+++ 2009-05-13 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.242228600E09 +++$+++ It's not about UEFA's \"illiteracy\". The names on the articles are the names used on the UEFA site, or the closest English option, so they don't need changing. Also, they're the regions' names, not club names...  +++$+++ :It's not about UEFA's "illiteracy". The names on the articles are the names used on the UEFA site, or the closest English option, so they don't need changing. Also, they're the regions' names, not club names... [[User:Craitman17|Ը२ձւե๓ձռ]]<sup>''[[User_talk:Craitman17|17]]''</sup> 08:30, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
14641 +++$+++ Craitman17 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14639 +++$+++ 14640 +++$+++ 2009-05-13 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.242261660E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but I've looked through the actual UEFA website for the Regions' Cup and found no mention of any \"Bastion Illichivsk\". As it is a UEFA competition, the names on the website are to be used, as that is what the official site uses and what any external links say. By the looks of it, the names you have given are either wrong or just a personal problem of yours. Also, as it's an amateur competition, the associations mentioned rarely actually have articles, and as it's for \"regions\", then regions (or their closest relation's article) are linked to for some proper consistency within all the articles.  +++$+++ ::I'm sorry, but I've looked through the actual UEFA website for the Regions' Cup and found no mention of any "Bastion Illichivsk". As it is a UEFA competition, the names on the website are to be used, as that is what the official site uses and what any external links say. By the looks of it, the names you have given are either wrong or just a personal problem of yours. Also, as it's an amateur competition, the associations mentioned rarely actually have articles, and as it's for "regions", then regions (or their closest relation's article) are linked to for some proper consistency within all the articles. [[User:Craitman17|Ը२ձւե๓ձռ]]<sup>''[[User_talk:Craitman17|17]]''</sup> 17:41, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
14642 +++$+++ Craitman17 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14639 +++$+++ 14641 +++$+++ 2009-05-13 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.242265740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the links, but I believe the current names on the articles are also in the names on those pages, and are also linkable and factually correct in the sense of ''regions''. And by personal, I meant that I thought you were taking the names on the articles as not being to your personal taste, when they are correct, and that you were focusing on just Ukrainian regions when there are probably other nations' entries which could also be discussed. Just as a by-the-by, there's really not point in trying to sway your argument by saying the teams you have mentioned have played in \"the Ukrainian Second League\" or have \"a history of professional-level competitions\", because the Regions' cup is an '''amateur''' competition; not for '''professionals'''. The current Group 6 also shows just \"Odessa\" on the fixtures and results page, as an abbreviation.  +++$+++ :::Thanks for the links, but I believe the current names on the articles are also in the names on those pages, and are also linkable and factually correct in the sense of ''regions''. And by personal, I meant that I thought you were taking the names on the articles as not being to your personal taste, when they are correct, and that you were focusing on just Ukrainian regions when there are probably other nations' entries which could also be discussed. Just as a by-the-by, there's really not point in trying to sway your argument by saying the teams you have mentioned have played in "the Ukrainian Second League" or have "a history of professional-level competitions", because the Regions' cup is an '''amateur''' competition; not for '''professionals'''. The current Group 6 also shows just "Odessa" on the fixtures and results page, as an abbreviation. [[User:Craitman17|Ը२ձւե๓ձռ]]<sup>''[[User_talk:Craitman17|17]]''</sup> 18:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

276784 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-06 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.173192180E09 +++$+++ editing and additions to the [[John Waddell]] article.  My writing style has always been pretty informal, unencyclopediac if you will, and you did a great job fixing it up.  This happened at an interesting time for me because I was supposed to go to Phoenix last weekend and visit with Waddell, but I couldn't get there.  A friend who was setting the meeting up probably did go and so when I saw your edit I thought that it might be his report.  But no.  In any case, thanks.  +++$+++ editing and additions to the [[John Waddell]] article.  My writing style has always been pretty informal, unencyclopediac if you will, and you did a great job fixing it up.  This happened at an interesting time for me because I was supposed to go to Phoenix last weekend and visit with Waddell, but I couldn't get there.  A friend who was setting the meeting up probably did go and so when I saw your edit I thought that it might be his report.  But no.  In any case, thanks. [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] 06:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
276785 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276784 +++$+++ 276784 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.173192600E09 +++$+++ No problem! Glad to help. The article already had a lot of good material. -- +++$+++ :No problem! Glad to help. The article already had a lot of good material. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 06:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

395656 +++$+++ Jcwf +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-16 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.308266700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Jcwf|Jcwf]] ([[User talk:Jcwf|talk]]) 16:25, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
395657 +++$+++ Jcwf +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395656 +++$+++ 395656 +++$+++ 2011-06-16 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.308267060E09 +++$+++ Oh, I suppose because it gives the apparent crystal symmetry rather than the actual space group. Confusing for a solid state chemist like me... That is kind of a general problem with these pages: there are two subsubsubdialects of the scientific language: the mineralogical one and the solid state science one. I find it hard to integrate the info. Somehow I do not think that we should play apartheid and have two separate pages like for CuS and covallite. The substance really does not know whether it as formed in the bowels of the earth rather than a lab. Ideas?  +++$+++ :Oh, I suppose because it gives the apparent crystal symmetry rather than the actual space group. Confusing for a solid state chemist like me... That is kind of a general problem with these pages: there are two subsubsubdialects of the scientific language: the mineralogical one and the solid state science one. I find it hard to integrate the info. Somehow I do not think that we should play apartheid and have two separate pages like for CuS and covallite. The substance really does not know whether it as formed in the bowels of the earth rather than a lab. Ideas? [[User:Jcwf|Jcwf]] ([[User talk:Jcwf|talk]]) 16:31, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
395658 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395656 +++$+++ 395657 +++$+++ 2011-06-16 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.308270240E09 +++$+++ Yes, the different approaches and terminology used by different fields do get confusing. The mineralogy articles are written using mineralogy references and terminology, however I agree that a link to the chemistry\/materials science article for the compound should be included if it exists. Does CdIn<sub>2<\/sub>S<sub>4<\/sub> have an article? I've added the [[space group]] for cadmoindite by the way (I need to be more consistent with this). I started the [[thiospinel group]] stub after getting a redlink while editing one of the mineral articles. It likely needs more detail as to the structure and analogy with spinels - thanks for adding to it.  +++$+++ ::Yes, the different approaches and terminology used by different fields do get confusing. The mineralogy articles are written using mineralogy references and terminology, however I agree that a link to the chemistry/materials science article for the compound should be included if it exists. Does CdIn<sub>2</sub>S<sub>4</sub> have an article? I've added the [[space group]] for cadmoindite by the way (I need to be more consistent with this). I started the [[thiospinel group]] stub after getting a redlink while editing one of the mineral articles. It likely needs more detail as to the structure and analogy with spinels - thanks for adding to it. [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] ([[User talk:Vsmith#top|talk]]) 17:24, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
395659 +++$+++ Chris.urs-o +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395656 +++$+++ 395658 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.308927420E09 +++$+++ There are 244 minerals from the H-M Class Isometric - Hexoctahedral (4\/m {{overline|3}} 2\/m) on Webmineral.com: [http:\/\/www.webmineral.com\/crystal\/Isometric-Hexoctahedral.shtml], some of them are F&nbsp;d3m, some F&nbsp;m3m ... There is no 4\/d Hermann-Maugin Symbol: [http:\/\/www.webmineral.com\/crystall.shtml] -- +++$+++ :::There are 244 minerals from the H-M Class Isometric - Hexoctahedral (4/m {{overline|3}} 2/m) on Webmineral.com: [http://www.webmineral.com/crystal/Isometric-Hexoctahedral.shtml], some of them are F&nbsp;d3m, some F&nbsp;m3m ... There is no 4/d Hermann-Maugin Symbol: [http://www.webmineral.com/crystall.shtml] --[[User:Chris.urs-o|Chris.urs-o]] ([[User talk:Chris.urs-o|talk]]) 07:57, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

14643 +++$+++ Stochil +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-18 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.242708960E09 +++$+++ Aleksandr, I noticed that you recently made a change to the [[FC Chornomorets Odessa]] squad page. You changed [[Serhei Nudnii]] to Ukrainian and changed the spelling of his names. Even though Nudnii was born in Ukraine he holds a Moldova citizenship and has played for their Under-21 team. In articles he is generally referred to as Moldovan. I realize that Premier League website lists him as Ukrainian, but his appearances for Moldova U-21 team would seem to signify that he is their citizen. The article in [http:\/\/www.chernomorets.odessa.ua\/club\/press_about\/39\/ Sport-Express Ukraine] also seems to suggest the same. Also see these sources: [http:\/\/www.moldfootball.com\/?index=news&news=3890&PHPSESSID=bc55763711618bcefffc76c9e38bfd8d moldfootball.com], [http:\/\/football.ua\/ukraine\/news\/63140.html Sport-Express Ukraine #2], and [http:\/\/www.chernomorets.com\/main\/read.aspx?id=11902 Unofficial club site] (based on OdessaFootball site). I know these references don't seem as strong as the Premier League listing\u2014and perhaps he holds dual citizenship\u2014but I am tempted to list him under Moldova as he seems to identify himself with it and has played at all junior levels for their national team. Let me know what you think in regards to this. \u2014  +++$+++ Aleksandr, I noticed that you recently made a change to the [[FC Chornomorets Odessa]] squad page. You changed [[Serhei Nudnii]] to Ukrainian and changed the spelling of his names. Even though Nudnii was born in Ukraine he holds a Moldova citizenship and has played for their Under-21 team. In articles he is generally referred to as Moldovan. I realize that Premier League website lists him as Ukrainian, but his appearances for Moldova U-21 team would seem to signify that he is their citizen. The article in [http://www.chernomorets.odessa.ua/club/press_about/39/ Sport-Express Ukraine] also seems to suggest the same. Also see these sources: [http://www.moldfootball.com/?index=news&news=3890&PHPSESSID=bc55763711618bcefffc76c9e38bfd8d moldfootball.com], [http://football.ua/ukraine/news/63140.html Sport-Express Ukraine #2], and [http://www.chernomorets.com/main/read.aspx?id=11902 Unofficial club site] (based on OdessaFootball site). I know these references don't seem as strong as the Premier League listing—and perhaps he holds dual citizenship—but I am tempted to list him under Moldova as he seems to identify himself with it and has played at all junior levels for their national team. Let me know what you think in regards to this. — [[User:Stochil|Stochil]] ([[User talk:Stochil|talk]]) 21:56, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
14644 +++$+++ Stochil +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14643 +++$+++ 14643 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.242789480E09 +++$+++ That makes sense. I didn't want to rush into reverting things back, and wanted to ask you first. I think stating the ambiguity of his citizenship is a good point. I will try to see if I can dig up if he appeared for Moldova U-21. That would help in this case. Thanks for your quick feedback! \u2014 +++$+++ : That makes sense. I didn't want to rush into reverting things back, and wanted to ask you first. I think stating the ambiguity of his citizenship is a good point. I will try to see if I can dig up if he appeared for Moldova U-21. That would help in this case. Thanks for your quick feedback! —[[User:Stochil|Stochil]] ([[User talk:Stochil|talk]]) 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

276789 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.173554880E09 +++$+++ Hey, saw you were a participant in the [[WP:Illinois|Illinois WikiProject]]. I thought I would let you know that there is a new [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Illinois\/Collaboration|Collaboration Division]] up for the project. The goal of the division is to select an article or articles for improvement to [[WP:WIAGA|Good article]] standard [[WP:WIAFA|or higher]]. There is a simple nomination process, which you can check out on the division subpage, to make sure each candidate for collaboration has enough interested editors. This is a good way to get a lot of articles to a quality status quickly. Please consider participating. More details can be seen at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Illinois\/Collaboration|division subpage]].  +++$+++ Hey, saw you were a participant in the [[WP:Illinois|Illinois WikiProject]]. I thought I would let you know that there is a new [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Illinois/Collaboration|Collaboration Division]] up for the project. The goal of the division is to select an article or articles for improvement to [[WP:WIAGA|Good article]] standard [[WP:WIAFA|or higher]]. There is a simple nomination process, which you can check out on the division subpage, to make sure each candidate for collaboration has enough interested editors. This is a good way to get a lot of articles to a quality status quickly. Please consider participating. More details can be seen at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Illinois/Collaboration|division subpage]]. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] 11:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
276790 +++$+++ Tom +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276789 +++$+++ 276789 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.173596160E09 +++$+++ Note: The reason I listed this is because it seems that it is not an official U.S. Gov image, but rather one made by a private studio.  Notice the copyright in the lower right corner.  Thanks. -- +++$+++ :Note: The reason I listed this is because it seems that it is not an official U.S. Gov image, but rather one made by a private studio.  Notice the copyright in the lower right corner.  Thanks. --[[user:tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]] - [[Special:Emailuser/Tom|email]]) 22:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

14646 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14646 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-28 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.243517400E09 +++$+++ Here is some web-sites for your information: [http:\/\/www.capitalofukraine.com\/name\/category\/press\/], [http:\/\/www.rada.gov.ua\/translit.htm], [http:\/\/www.rada.gov.ua\/const\/conengl.htm] check the Article 20 of the Constitution of Ukraine, and a bit more here [http:\/\/www.capitalofukraine.com\/name\/]. Those people who try to edit the wikipedia article about Kyiv are Russians and they are simple trying to get rid of traces of Ukrainization worldwide. When I try to argue with them they show me some stupid articles that they googled. Those are mostly from the newspapers like the Komsomolskaya Pravda which is basically a pulp fiction.Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 06:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ Here is some web-sites for your information: [http://www.capitalofukraine.com/name/category/press/], [http://www.rada.gov.ua/translit.htm], [http://www.rada.gov.ua/const/conengl.htm] check the Article 20 of the Constitution of Ukraine, and a bit more here [http://www.capitalofukraine.com/name/]. Those people who try to edit the wikipedia article about Kyiv are Russians and they are simple trying to get rid of traces of Ukrainization worldwide. When I try to argue with them they show me some stupid articles that they googled. Those are mostly from the newspapers like the Komsomolskaya Pravda which is basically a pulp fiction.Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 06:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
14647 +++$+++ Ev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14646 +++$+++ 14646 +++$+++ 2009-05-28 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.243553940E09 +++$+++ By the way, if you want to change the current [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions|naming conventions]] of the English Wikipedia, you're free to propose your desired modifications at the appropriate talk page (for example, at [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions]] :-) However, while the current conventions remain in place, they should be respected: they are an [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|official policy]] of the English-language Wikipedia. - Best,  +++$+++ :By the way, if you want to change the current [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions|naming conventions]] of the English Wikipedia, you're free to propose your desired modifications at the appropriate talk page (for example, at [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions]] :-) However, while the current conventions remain in place, they should be respected: they are an [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|official policy]] of the English-language Wikipedia. - Best, [[User:Ev|Ev]] ([[User talk:Ev|talk]]) 16:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

276791 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276791 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-16 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.174085760E09 +++$+++ I like your proposed dab, but would like to make a few modifications; but I'm not about to do so without your OK. It's your sandbox! -- +++$+++ I like your proposed dab, but would like to make a few modifications; but I'm not about to do so without your OK. It's your sandbox! --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]] 15:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
276792 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276791 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.174085940E09 +++$+++ Feel free, I put it out there for that reason. I'll put a tag on it.--  +++$+++ :: Feel free, I put it out there for that reason. I'll put a tag on it.-- [[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 15:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

14648 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14648 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-28 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.243567560E09 +++$+++ I see your point. But do your realize that promoting the name of Kiev instead of Kyiv in a encyclopedia will lead to further confusion of that issue? Why? Simply. Of course, people who know nothing of Ukrainian culture, language, and history care less in that regard, yet the others who also familiar with English language will be puzzled. First of all the this ecyclopedia contradicts the Laws of Ukraine and second of all promotes further illiteracy. What about the scientific and cultural perception? The Academy of Science of Ukraine officially declared the usage of Kyiv, which was later accepted by the Ukrainian parliament and other official institutions around the globe. Now you advocating the issue of numbers by googling which does not really justify anything. How about check the quality of the articles instead of simply calling numbers? Are we to accept quantity over the quality? I believe that encyclopedia ought to follow the correct promotion of the concept definition otherwise it looses its sense. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 20:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ I see your point. But do your realize that promoting the name of Kiev instead of Kyiv in a encyclopedia will lead to further confusion of that issue? Why? Simply. Of course, people who know nothing of Ukrainian culture, language, and history care less in that regard, yet the others who also familiar with English language will be puzzled. First of all the this ecyclopedia contradicts the Laws of Ukraine and second of all promotes further illiteracy. What about the scientific and cultural perception? The Academy of Science of Ukraine officially declared the usage of Kyiv, which was later accepted by the Ukrainian parliament and other official institutions around the globe. Now you advocating the issue of numbers by googling which does not really justify anything. How about check the quality of the articles instead of simply calling numbers? Are we to accept quantity over the quality? I believe that encyclopedia ought to follow the correct promotion of the concept definition otherwise it looses its sense. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 20:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
14649 +++$+++ Ev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14648 +++$+++ 14648 +++$+++ 2009-05-28 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.243568700E09 +++$+++ Of course, you can propose changing our current approach at [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)]]. If you obtain there a consensus to change our naming conventions from \"prefering the names the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize (reflecting common English usage)\" to \"following Ukrainian legislation\", then ''Kyiv'' would be used in our articles. \u2013 But as long as our naming conventions remain in their current form, they should be followed: they are an [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|official policy]] of the English-language Wikipedia. - Best regards,  +++$+++ :Of course, you can propose changing our current approach at [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)]]. If you obtain there a consensus to change our naming conventions from "prefering the names the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize (reflecting common English usage)" to "following Ukrainian legislation", then ''Kyiv'' would be used in our articles. – But as long as our naming conventions remain in their current form, they should be followed: they are an [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|official policy]] of the English-language Wikipedia. - Best regards, [[User:Ev|Ev]] ([[User talk:Ev|talk]]) 20:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
14650 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14648 +++$+++ 14648 +++$+++ 2009-05-28 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.243570920E09 +++$+++ Another similar case is with the city of Lviv which was founded by the Ukraine-Ruthenian prince as Lvov in the name of his son. That became an accepted name in Russia and Poland. But the name officially was changed to the modern Ukrainian language and, thus, now it is called as Lviv. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ *Another similar case is with the city of Lviv which was founded by the Ukraine-Ruthenian prince as Lvov in the name of his son. That became an accepted name in Russia and Poland. But the name officially was changed to the modern Ukrainian language and, thus, now it is called as Lviv. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
14651 +++$+++ Ev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14648 +++$+++ 14650 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.243638000E09 +++$+++ In any case, the central place to discuss the issue of \"Kyiv vs Kiev\" is [[Talk:Kiev\/naming]], while proposals to change our naming conventions should be made at [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)]]. - Best,  +++$+++ ::In any case, the central place to discuss the issue of "Kyiv vs Kiev" is [[Talk:Kiev/naming]], while proposals to change our naming conventions should be made at [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)]]. - Best, [[User:Ev|Ev]] ([[User talk:Ev|talk]]) 16:00, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

276793 +++$+++ Pmgpmg +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276793 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-17 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.174166820E09 +++$+++ [[User:Dhartung\/USS Fulton]] Are you gonna paste that in main space ? -- +++$+++ [[User:Dhartung/USS Fulton]] Are you gonna paste that in main space ? --[[User:Pmgpmg|Pmgpmg]] 14:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
276794 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276793 +++$+++ 276793 +++$+++ 2007-03-17 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.174188420E09 +++$+++ I'm finally getting some time and thought space to start working on articles again, so soon. Thanks for the reminder! --  +++$+++ :I'm finally getting some time and thought space to start working on articles again, so soon. Thanks for the reminder! -- [[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 20:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

538938 +++$+++ Ghirlandajo +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-18 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.153231380E09 +++$+++ Hello, I would welcome a third opinion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGhirlandajo&diff=64372302&oldid=64310203 on this issue]. --<font color=\"FC4339\"> +++$+++ Hello, I would welcome a third opinion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGhirlandajo&diff=64372302&oldid=64310203 on this issue]. --<font color="FC4339">[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</font></sup> 07:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
538939 +++$+++ Tevus +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538938 +++$+++ 538938 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.153313340E09 +++$+++ Auch, Sie sind ein Fan von Rammstein? Ich bin auch ein Fan von Rammstein, aber mein Deutsch ist nicht sehr gut, also ich verstehen nicht eine Menge ihre Lyriken.  +++$+++ :Auch, Sie sind ein Fan von Rammstein? Ich bin auch ein Fan von Rammstein, aber mein Deutsch ist nicht sehr gut, also ich verstehen nicht eine Menge ihre Lyriken. [[User:Tevus|Tev]] 05:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

14652 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-29 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.243642200E09 +++$+++ And last, you mentioning of English in Ukraine are right that English is not the official language in the country (and never will, hopefully) and not even the secondary. Nevertheless, that does not mean anything beside, maybe, some weird implication regarding the education in Ukraine. :) Yes, I am sensative when it concerns my native land. My bottom line is that the conventions that you are refering me have different ways interpretations. It seems to me as we are pursuing different ideas. I am implying that the name was changed and you are suggesting that the name was re-transliterated. I guess if the name have changed into Novokyivsk then your arguement would be dropped as in case of Stalingrad and Sverdlovsk. Am I right? :) Is it possible, at least, to get rid of the comment about the Monopoly which implies that spelling of Kyiv being influenced from the outside? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 17:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ And last, you mentioning of English in Ukraine are right that English is not the official language in the country (and never will, hopefully) and not even the secondary. Nevertheless, that does not mean anything beside, maybe, some weird implication regarding the education in Ukraine. :) Yes, I am sensative when it concerns my native land. My bottom line is that the conventions that you are refering me have different ways interpretations. It seems to me as we are pursuing different ideas. I am implying that the name was changed and you are suggesting that the name was re-transliterated. I guess if the name have changed into Novokyivsk then your arguement would be dropped as in case of Stalingrad and Sverdlovsk. Am I right? :) Is it possible, at least, to get rid of the comment about the Monopoly which implies that spelling of Kyiv being influenced from the outside? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 17:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
14653 +++$+++ Ev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14652 +++$+++ 14652 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.243645500E09 +++$+++ Best regards,  +++$+++ :Best regards, [[User:Ev|Ev]] ([[User talk:Ev|talk]]) 18:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

526730 +++$+++ Teens! +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-07 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.178535420E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you reverted (and warned) anon user 76.97.5.111 about a change he recently made to an article. This user has also been vandalising my Talk page, by re-inserting a bogus warning from a banned sockpuppet which I ad removed. I suspect this user is the same as 68.219.149.22, since that user did the same to my page a while ago. anon user 76.97.5.111 has already been blocked before for vandalism, I was hoping you could block him again.  +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you reverted (and warned) anon user 76.97.5.111 about a change he recently made to an article. This user has also been vandalising my Talk page, by re-inserting a bogus warning from a banned sockpuppet which I ad removed. I suspect this user is the same as 68.219.149.22, since that user did the same to my page a while ago. anon user 76.97.5.111 has already been blocked before for vandalism, I was hoping you could block him again. [[User:Teens!|Teens!]] 03:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
526731 +++$+++ Teens! +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526730 +++$+++ 526730 +++$+++ 2007-05-07 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.178580420E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks.  +++$+++ :Ok, thanks. [[User:Teens!|Teens!]] 16:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

14654 +++$+++ Mariah-Yulia +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14654 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-28 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.243572300E09 +++$+++ I don't think this discussion is productive... I noticed that while a lot of people write Kyiv (and not Kiev) a lot of people also write [[Lugansk[[ (instead of the correct form of the city's name [[Luhansk]]), [[Dnepropetrovsk]] (in stead of [[Dnipropetrovsk]]) and [[Kharkov]] (in stead of [[Kharkiv]]), I think we can make better use of our time if we correct all the Ukrainian city names mistakes (not sure if there always mistakes or nationalist statments...) usings EV's format ([[Dnepropetrovsk]] \u2192 [[Dnipropetrovsk]] ((to reflect [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions|common English usage]] & for [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)|consistency with those articles]])) instead of \"fighting\" about Kiev vs. Kyiv all the time... \u2014  +++$+++ I don't think this discussion is productive... I noticed that while a lot of people write Kyiv (and not Kiev) a lot of people also write [[Lugansk[[ (instead of the correct form of the city's name [[Luhansk]]), [[Dnepropetrovsk]] (in stead of [[Dnipropetrovsk]]) and [[Kharkov]] (in stead of [[Kharkiv]]), I think we can make better use of our time if we correct all the Ukrainian city names mistakes (not sure if there always mistakes or nationalist statments...) usings EV's format ([[Dnepropetrovsk]] → [[Dnipropetrovsk]] ((to reflect [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions|common English usage]] & for [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)|consistency with those articles]])) instead of "fighting" about Kiev vs. Kyiv all the time... — [[User:Mariah-Yulia|Mariah-Yulia]] ([[User talk:Mariah-Yulia|talk]]) 21:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
14655 +++$+++ Ev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14654 +++$+++ 14654 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.243638000E09 +++$+++ I'm flattered. :-)  +++$+++ :I'm flattered. :-) [[User:Ev|Ev]] ([[User talk:Ev|talk]]) 16:00, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

14656 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-12 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.271123100E09 +++$+++ You are saying that I should be consistent with the naming for the city. However the article mentions the usage for the city's name as I write. So, why do you keep on changing the names when it is an accepted usage in the international community and mentioning something about the consistency? Please, refer to [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)#Divided usage]] which states that there are no particular rules as long as it is the least surprising to the reader. So, the people who study the international laws and will be researching about Ukraine have potential in running into a great degree of confusion while observing the official documents that have spelling different than wikipedia does. Would not you agree? Now, who else might be interested in the study of the Ukraine's capital and not be aware of potential difference in spelling usage? Not that many. The articles that I wrote pretty much based on history. The usage romanized version of Ukrainian spelling of most city's in that country in that period is missing as the Soviet censorship got rid of them. I am simply following the [[scientific transliteration]] and the transliteration that was officially accepted by the [[Verkhovna Rada|parliament of Ukraine]] in that regard as they were used in actual official documents. I do not really see in wikipedia when people actually agreed on a particular usage of the form that you are promoting. I will be awaiting your explanation. Respectfully, Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 18:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ You are saying that I should be consistent with the naming for the city. However the article mentions the usage for the city's name as I write. So, why do you keep on changing the names when it is an accepted usage in the international community and mentioning something about the consistency? Please, refer to [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)#Divided usage]] which states that there are no particular rules as long as it is the least surprising to the reader. So, the people who study the international laws and will be researching about Ukraine have potential in running into a great degree of confusion while observing the official documents that have spelling different than wikipedia does. Would not you agree? Now, who else might be interested in the study of the Ukraine's capital and not be aware of potential difference in spelling usage? Not that many. The articles that I wrote pretty much based on history. The usage romanized version of Ukrainian spelling of most city's in that country in that period is missing as the Soviet censorship got rid of them. I am simply following the [[scientific transliteration]] and the transliteration that was officially accepted by the [[Verkhovna Rada|parliament of Ukraine]] in that regard as they were used in actual official documents. I do not really see in wikipedia when people actually agreed on a particular usage of the form that you are promoting. I will be awaiting your explanation. Respectfully, Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 18:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
14657 +++$+++ Ev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14656 +++$+++ 14656 +++$+++ 2010-04-12 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.271131500E09 +++$+++ Best regards,  +++$+++ :Best regards, [[User:Ev|Ev]] ([[User talk:Ev|talk]]) 21:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

276801 +++$+++ Noroton +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.174540620E09 +++$+++ I've just put a lot of work into improving [[Human rights in pre-Saddam Iraq]] so that the article is not now anything like what it was when you voted to merge. I don't know that it meets your objections to it, but please take another look and see what you think. I'm still not satisfied with the article, but it has roughly the proper scope and many more reliable sources. I think what I've done shows that there's too much material out there to merge this article with anything else. Significant gaps remain and some subjects should have footnotes from more sources, but I think the article is several steps toward what it should be. Best,  +++$+++ I've just put a lot of work into improving [[Human rights in pre-Saddam Iraq]] so that the article is not now anything like what it was when you voted to merge. I don't know that it meets your objections to it, but please take another look and see what you think. I'm still not satisfied with the article, but it has roughly the proper scope and many more reliable sources. I think what I've done shows that there's too much material out there to merge this article with anything else. Significant gaps remain and some subjects should have footnotes from more sources, but I think the article is several steps toward what it should be. Best, [[User:Noroton|Noroton]] 22:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
276802 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276801 +++$+++ 276801 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.174552980E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. It is important to get those credits, because our editors who work on the image beat are very aggressive about protecting Wikipedia from potential copyright violations! (And yes, this was an appropriate place to \"talk\".)--  +++$+++ :You're welcome. It is important to get those credits, because our editors who work on the image beat are very aggressive about protecting Wikipedia from potential copyright violations! (And yes, this was an appropriate place to "talk".)-- [[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 01:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
276803 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276801 +++$+++ 276801 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.174786440E09 +++$+++ You know, that's all very interesting. No, sorry, I lied. It isn't interesting at all, nor does it make much sense. Mr. Lamont (or Mr. Bernstein, whoever you are), your article was deleted by community consensus. Its deletion was upheld by consensus. Please find another place to tell your story. --  +++$+++ :You know, that's all very interesting. No, sorry, I lied. It isn't interesting at all, nor does it make much sense. Mr. Lamont (or Mr. Bernstein, whoever you are), your article was deleted by community consensus. Its deletion was upheld by consensus. Please find another place to tell your story. -- [[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 18:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
276804 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276801 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.174797960E09 +++$+++ What. Ever. I have no power to change consensus, so pray tell, why are you haranguing me? --  +++$+++ :::What. Ever. I have no power to change consensus, so pray tell, why are you haranguing me? -- [[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 21:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
276805 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276801 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.174800300E09 +++$+++ Okay, that's a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]]. This is just harassment; please do not contact me again. --  +++$+++ :::::Okay, that's a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]]. This is just harassment; please do not contact me again. -- [[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 22:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
276806 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276801 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.174802280E09 +++$+++ Beyond these questions, I don't know why you are contacting me. You are certainly failing to make yourself clear. If you do have a question that can be stated as clearly as these examples, do so. I do not wish to be impolite, but I don't have time to wade through another ten paragraphs of legalistic prose with very little discernible content. If you do reply, please do so '''below''', in this section, not in another part of my discussion page. --  +++$+++ :::::::Beyond these questions, I don't know why you are contacting me. You are certainly failing to make yourself clear. If you do have a question that can be stated as clearly as these examples, do so. I do not wish to be impolite, but I don't have time to wade through another ten paragraphs of legalistic prose with very little discernible content. If you do reply, please do so '''below''', in this section, not in another part of my discussion page. -- [[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 22:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
276807 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276801 +++$+++ 276801 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.174820640E09 +++$+++ This is my User Talk page, and no, I do not want to have that discussion with you. --  +++$+++ :This is my User Talk page, and no, I do not want to have that discussion with you. -- [[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 04:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

14658 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14658 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-12 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.271125560E09 +++$+++ Related argument I can draw with usage of ''the Ukraine'' which was accepted before the Independence of the [[Ukrainian SSR]]. Most of members of wikipedia acknowledge that it has nothing to do with politics or history. However, if you are to ignore, that does it make the encyclopedia scientific? That only reflects a total ignorance as [[Ukraine]] was accepted throughout the English-speaking community while being totally disrespected within. Respectfully, Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ Related argument I can draw with usage of ''the Ukraine'' which was accepted before the Independence of the [[Ukrainian SSR]]. Most of members of wikipedia acknowledge that it has nothing to do with politics or history. However, if you are to ignore, that does it make the encyclopedia scientific? That only reflects a total ignorance as [[Ukraine]] was accepted throughout the English-speaking community while being totally disrespected within. Respectfully, Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
14659 +++$+++ Ev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14658 +++$+++ 14658 +++$+++ 2010-04-12 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.271131500E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are saying. - Best,  +++$+++ :I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are saying. - Best, [[User:Ev|Ev]] ([[User talk:Ev|talk]]) 21:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

14660 +++$+++  +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-12 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.271126340E09 +++$+++ As I see I am not the only one who vouch for such spelling on your talk page. Maybe you ought to listen to those petitions. Your statement about some accepted usage or whatever you call it either shows disrespect to the official request that was made back in 1991 by the government of Ukraine or your fellow wikipedians prefer to follow it. In my opinion and because wikipedia does state that it is free the naming policy should be left open as long as it has some academic or official grounds and it is not offensive to general public. The spelling of the name was accepted by the government of Ukraine which is elected by the population of nearly 50 million people. Are to ignore such representation and follow some newspaper articles written by who-knows-whom? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 19:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ As I see I am not the only one who vouch for such spelling on your talk page. Maybe you ought to listen to those petitions. Your statement about some accepted usage or whatever you call it either shows disrespect to the official request that was made back in 1991 by the government of Ukraine or your fellow wikipedians prefer to follow it. In my opinion and because wikipedia does state that it is free the naming policy should be left open as long as it has some academic or official grounds and it is not offensive to general public. The spelling of the name was accepted by the government of Ukraine which is elected by the population of nearly 50 million people. Are to ignore such representation and follow some newspaper articles written by who-knows-whom? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 19:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
14661 +++$+++ Ev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14660 +++$+++ 14660 +++$+++ 2010-04-12 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.271131500E09 +++$+++ Aleksandr, our policy on [[Wikipedia:Article titles|article titles]] and our [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)|naming conventions for geographic names]] ask us to reflect common English usage. For the specific purpose of choosing names in the English-language Wikipedia, official requests by ''any'' government are just as irrelevant as etymology, history, politics, diplomacy & correctness.  \u2014 Of course, you're free to propose that such official requests by governments be taken into account at [[Wikipedia talk:Article titles]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)]].  \u2014 The repeated complaints only show that some editors either don't know, don't understand or don't want to follow the current policies & conventions of the English-language Wikipedia. - Best,  +++$+++ :Aleksandr, our policy on [[Wikipedia:Article titles|article titles]] and our [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)|naming conventions for geographic names]] ask us to reflect common English usage. For the specific purpose of choosing names in the English-language Wikipedia, official requests by ''any'' government are just as irrelevant as etymology, history, politics, diplomacy & correctness.  — Of course, you're free to propose that such official requests by governments be taken into account at [[Wikipedia talk:Article titles]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)]].  — The repeated complaints only show that some editors either don't know, don't understand or don't want to follow the current policies & conventions of the English-language Wikipedia. - Best, [[User:Ev|Ev]] ([[User talk:Ev|talk]]) 21:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

611521 +++$+++ KerioBerry +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-04 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.309810740E09 +++$+++ Are you still adopting? I'm new to wikipedia and looking to be adopted so i can make some useful edits without them being removed! Help appreciated :)  +++$+++ Are you still adopting? I'm new to wikipedia and looking to be adopted so i can make some useful edits without them being removed! Help appreciated :) [[User:KerioBerry|KerioBerry]] ([[User talk:KerioBerry|talk]]) 13:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
611522 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611521 +++$+++ 611521 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.309830660E09 +++$+++ I always am. I'm a bit busy today, but I'll try to start advising you tomorrow.  +++$+++ :I always am. I'm a bit busy today, but I'll try to start advising you tomorrow. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 18:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

14667 +++$+++ Garik 11 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14667 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-20 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.248106800E09 +++$+++ I think you should do some major copy-editing of your contributions to the article. \"Kyivan\", \"Bilshoviks\", etc. should not be used alongside with commonly accepted English equivalents in Wikipedia. Also, what is \"sturm\"?  +++$+++ I think you should do some major copy-editing of your contributions to the article. "Kyivan", "Bilshoviks", etc. should not be used alongside with commonly accepted English equivalents in Wikipedia. Also, what is "sturm"? [[User:Garik 11|Garik 11]] ([[User talk:Garik 11|talk]]) 09:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
14668 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14667 +++$+++ 14667 +++$+++ 2009-07-20 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.248121440E09 +++$+++ I thought that is an universal word. I guess not really:) Sturm in many languages means a military maneuver like a [[Charge (warfare)|charge]], when soldiers attack at no cost like [[storming of bastille]]. That is weird, but for some reason the only meaning for a storm on English Wikipedia is only for a weather. The maneuver I tried to describe is more than just a charge.  +++$+++ :I thought that is an universal word. I guess not really:) Sturm in many languages means a military maneuver like a [[Charge (warfare)|charge]], when soldiers attack at no cost like [[storming of bastille]]. That is weird, but for some reason the only meaning for a storm on English Wikipedia is only for a weather. The maneuver I tried to describe is more than just a charge. [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] ([[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev#top|talk]]) 13:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

276812 +++$+++ Halibutt +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276812 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-02 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.175576340E09 +++$+++ Hello there. I saw your ''weak delete'' at the recent AfD voting on ''German Soldier's House''. Could you check the article now, after I added more sources? Sure, it's still a stub, but it's much better referenced IMO. BTW, I'm not so sure the name is well-established (the only easily-available source to confirm it is a German documentary - also linked from the article - while other sources I read do not mention any organizational names at all). But this is a matter of [[WP:MOVE]] IMO, not of [[WP:VfD]]. ''<font color=\"#901\">\/\/<\/font>'' +++$+++ Hello there. I saw your ''weak delete'' at the recent AfD voting on ''German Soldier's House''. Could you check the article now, after I added more sources? Sure, it's still a stub, but it's much better referenced IMO. BTW, I'm not so sure the name is well-established (the only easily-available source to confirm it is a German documentary - also linked from the article - while other sources I read do not mention any organizational names at all). But this is a matter of [[WP:MOVE]] IMO, not of [[WP:VfD]]. ''<font color="#901">//</font>''[[User:Halibutt|Halibu]][[User talk:Halibutt|tt]] 21:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
276813 +++$+++ Halibutt +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276812 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.175930280E09 +++$+++ It's me again. In the AfD debate you have shown interest in reworking the article into a new on, focused on all forced prostitution in Nazi Germany in general rather than the Wehrmaht and SS-oriented aspect the stub was on. May I help you in any way? Or do you prefer to do it alone? ''<font color=\"#901\">\/\/<\/font>'' +++$+++ ::It's me again. In the AfD debate you have shown interest in reworking the article into a new on, focused on all forced prostitution in Nazi Germany in general rather than the Wehrmaht and SS-oriented aspect the stub was on. May I help you in any way? Or do you prefer to do it alone? ''<font color="#901">//</font>''[[User:Halibutt|Halibu]][[User talk:Halibutt|tt]] 00:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

14671 +++$+++ Invest in knowledge +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-18 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.250607780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Invest in knowledge|Invest in knowledge]] ([[User talk:Invest in knowledge|talk]]) 08:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
14672 +++$+++ Invest in knowledge +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14671 +++$+++ 14671 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.250689920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ : [[User:Invest in knowledge|Invest in knowledge]] ([[User talk:Invest in knowledge|talk]]) 06:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

538960 +++$+++ Eliade +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-30 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.154303580E09 +++$+++ Dear Todor, no, I'm not trying to do that, as may seen annoying but you did that ''first'' with my edit on Central Europe. Have you forgotten already? Now is the question, how reliable are the sources with estimations from 2006? -- +++$+++ Dear Todor, no, I'm not trying to do that, as may seen annoying but you did that ''first'' with my edit on Central Europe. Have you forgotten already? Now is the question, how reliable are the sources with estimations from 2006? --[[User:Eliade|<font color="blue">'''Eliade'''</font>]] 16:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
538961 +++$+++ Eliade +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538960 +++$+++ 538960 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.154304060E09 +++$+++ OK, how reliable are the sources. Have you an official link? Provide them all please. -- +++$+++ :OK, how reliable are the sources. Have you an official link? Provide them all please. --[[User:Eliade|<font color="blue">'''Eliade'''</font>]] 17:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

14673 +++$+++ Brudder Andrusha +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-22 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.250986740E09 +++$+++ The game has NOT been played yet!!!  +++$+++ The game has NOT been played yet!!! [[User:Brudder Andrusha|Brudder Andrusha]] ([[User talk:Brudder Andrusha|talk]]) 17:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
14674 +++$+++ Brudder Andrusha +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14673 +++$+++ 14673 +++$+++ 2009-08-22 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.250987340E09 +++$+++ The online updates are not from PFL, they are from ua-football.com which as you know is the media which covers football in YKPAIHA. They are invariably wrong with the scores as I have pointed out previously. If you look at the \"Calender of Matches\" from PFL you will see that the Ros - Bukovyna match is scheduled for August 23. That should be reasonable because both Arsenal Bila Tserkva and Ros' share the home ground in Bila Tserkva and Arsenal had a home game against PFC Sevastapol today.  +++$+++ :The online updates are not from PFL, they are from ua-football.com which as you know is the media which covers football in YKPAIHA. They are invariably wrong with the scores as I have pointed out previously. If you look at the "Calender of Matches" from PFL you will see that the Ros - Bukovyna match is scheduled for August 23. That should be reasonable because both Arsenal Bila Tserkva and Ros' share the home ground in Bila Tserkva and Arsenal had a home game against PFC Sevastapol today. [[User:Brudder Andrusha|Brudder Andrusha]] ([[User talk:Brudder Andrusha|talk]]) 17:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

538962 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-31 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.154340240E09 +++$+++ Hi, Todor.  Can you drop in to [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|FAR]] and give us your appraisal of the progress on articles you've nominated for review?  [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Economy of the Republic of Ireland]], [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Lego]], and [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Lastovo]].  Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi, Todor.  Can you drop in to [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|FAR]] and give us your appraisal of the progress on articles you've nominated for review?  [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Economy of the Republic of Ireland]], [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Lego]], and [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Lastovo]].  Thanks, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] 03:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
538963 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538962 +++$+++ 538962 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.154382540E09 +++$+++ Hi, Todor.  I haven't checked in on each of the reviews yet today, but we are just putting out notices to make sure that nominators are following up on the articles nominated.  If you've already followed up on those, please ignore me :-)    +++$+++ :Hi, Todor.  I haven't checked in on each of the reviews yet today, but we are just putting out notices to make sure that nominators are following up on the articles nominated.  If you've already followed up on those, please ignore me :-)   [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] 14:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

541689 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-11 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.213179060E09 +++$+++ Hey cool, source as much as you possibly can with that.  :)  +++$+++ Hey cool, source as much as you possibly can with that.  :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 03:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
541690 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541689 +++$+++ 541689 +++$+++ 2008-06-11 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.213179960E09 +++$+++ I plan to!  That's why I got it.  I figure if I do ten pages a day before my regular before-bed Wiki work, I can finish it by the end of the month.   +++$+++ :I plan to!  That's why I got it.  I figure if I do ten pages a day before my regular before-bed Wiki work, I can finish it by the end of the month.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 03:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
541691 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541689 +++$+++ 541690 +++$+++ 2008-06-11 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.213211340E09 +++$+++ Awesome.  :)  +++$+++ ::Awesome.  :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 12:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

14676 +++$+++ Zazaban +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-31 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.251721920E09 +++$+++ Didn't mean to add that back in, was concerned about the other stuff.  +++$+++ Didn't mean to add that back in, was concerned about the other stuff. [[User:Zazaban|Zazaban]] ([[User talk:Zazaban|talk]]) 05:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
14677 +++$+++ Zazaban +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14676 +++$+++ 14676 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.251722460E09 +++$+++ Grammar clean up is great, much needed. :) But my concern was about the removal of any mention of [[anarchism]], which it is well established, and sourced, to have been based on.  +++$+++ : Grammar clean up is great, much needed. :) But my concern was about the removal of any mention of [[anarchism]], which it is well established, and sourced, to have been based on. [[User:Zazaban|Zazaban]] ([[User talk:Zazaban|talk]]) 05:41, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

538965 +++$+++ Eliade +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-31 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.154367120E09 +++$+++ If you don't try the minumum of compromise I will be forced by you to start an RfC against your impulsive not willing to accept the compromise: [[Romanians]] ([[Vlachs]]). -- +++$+++ If you don't try the minumum of compromise I will be forced by you to start an RfC against your impulsive not willing to accept the compromise: [[Romanians]] ([[Vlachs]]). --[[User:Eliade|<font color="blue">'''Eliade'''</font>]] 10:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
538966 +++$+++ Eliade +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538965 +++$+++ 538965 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.154374560E09 +++$+++ Not at all Todor. Simply for an RfC I need to prove that I tried to make an compromise which you fail to accept it. Now, I have all the arguments to start a winning RfC against your not willing to accept the compromise solution as in other articles: [[Romanians]] ([[Vlachs]]). -- +++$+++ :Not at all Todor. Simply for an RfC I need to prove that I tried to make an compromise which you fail to accept it. Now, I have all the arguments to start a winning RfC against your not willing to accept the compromise solution as in other articles: [[Romanians]] ([[Vlachs]]). --[[User:Eliade|<font color="blue">'''Eliade'''</font>]] 12:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
538967 +++$+++ Eliade +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538965 +++$+++ 538966 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.154375220E09 +++$+++ You have a very low tollerance towards minorities http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Pleven&action=history This will not bring you any succes, you will not be Admin ever. You'll fail and you'll loose your support. Instead of having friends here you make only enemies. Let's discuss and let me convince you to drop it and accept my formulation: [[Romanians]] ([[Vlachs]]). What do you say? Cheers, -- +++$+++ ::You have a very low tollerance towards minorities http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pleven&action=history This will not bring you any succes, you will not be Admin ever. You'll fail and you'll loose your support. Instead of having friends here you make only enemies. Let's discuss and let me convince you to drop it and accept my formulation: [[Romanians]] ([[Vlachs]]). What do you say? Cheers, --[[User:Eliade|<font color="blue">'''Eliade'''</font>]] 12:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
538968 +++$+++ Eliade +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538965 +++$+++ 538965 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.154376000E09 +++$+++ Yes, you want to diminish even those 252 Vlachs from your province. How many of them were forced not to declare as [[Vlachs]]\/[[Romanians]]? Real statistics indicate at least 5 times of the official results. Because there are people like you who wants to hide the real truth.-- +++$+++ :Yes, you want to diminish even those 252 Vlachs from your province. How many of them were forced not to declare as [[Vlachs]]/[[Romanians]]? Real statistics indicate at least 5 times of the official results. Because there are people like you who wants to hide the real truth.--[[User:Eliade|<font color="blue">'''Eliade'''</font>]] 13:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
538969 +++$+++ Eliade +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538965 +++$+++ 538965 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.154385180E09 +++$+++ Put an end of it Todor. There are at least 3 Users that don't agree with you. I did try to speak with you very nice, now why are you dissapointing me? Don't you find my proposal as a compromise solution for you? Why is it so difficult for you to accept it? Have I touched your feelings? -- +++$+++ :Put an end of it Todor. There are at least 3 Users that don't agree with you. I did try to speak with you very nice, now why are you dissapointing me? Don't you find my proposal as a compromise solution for you? Why is it so difficult for you to accept it? Have I touched your feelings? --[[User:Eliade|<font color="blue">'''Eliade'''</font>]] 15:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

614116 +++$+++ Heyitspeter +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-22 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.266907560E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Heyitspeter|Heyitspeter]] ([[User talk:Heyitspeter|talk]]) 22:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
614117 +++$+++ Heyitspeter +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614116 +++$+++ 614116 +++$+++ 2010-02-23 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.266912120E09 +++$+++ More specifically, I'd greatly appreciate a response to the relevant subsection at the bottom of the page. However, in general and in the future please refrain from editing my talkpage except where you feel WP policy specifically calls for it. Your additions have been unhelpful (''viz''. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Heyitspeter&diff=345636913&oldid=345636179][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Heyitspeter&diff=342474194&oldid=342466276] [responses follow these diffs in case it's not immediately clear to you why they are problematic]).-- +++$+++ :More specifically, I'd greatly appreciate a response to the relevant subsection at the bottom of the page. However, in general and in the future please refrain from editing my talkpage except where you feel WP policy specifically calls for it. Your additions have been unhelpful (''viz''. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Heyitspeter&diff=345636913&oldid=345636179][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Heyitspeter&diff=342474194&oldid=342466276] [responses follow these diffs in case it's not immediately clear to you why they are problematic]).--[[User:Heyitspeter|Heyitspeter]] ([[User talk:Heyitspeter|talk]]) 00:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

14682 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-22 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.261483560E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 04:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
14683 +++$+++ Ezhiki +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14682 +++$+++ 14682 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Aleksandr, I have reverted your copy-paste moves.  Moves in Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia|should never be performed by copying contents of an article to another location]], for licensing reasons.  Please utilize the functionality of the \"Move\" tab instead.  For cases when a move cannot be performed because the target page is occupied, you can submit a [[WP:RM|move request]].  Please let me know if you need any help or have questions.  Best,\u2014 +++$+++ :Aleksandr, I have reverted your copy-paste moves.  Moves in Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia|should never be performed by copying contents of an article to another location]], for licensing reasons.  Please utilize the functionality of the "Move" tab instead.  For cases when a move cannot be performed because the target page is occupied, you can submit a [[WP:RM|move request]].  Please let me know if you need any help or have questions.  Best,—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); 14:48, December&nbsp;22, 2009 (UTC)
14684 +++$+++ Ezhiki +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14682 +++$+++ 14683 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Aleksandr, I have no opinion regarding whether the current spelling is proper or improper nor am I, frankly, too interested in finding out what the best title for this article should be.  However, what most certainly ''is'' improper is the way you went about changing the title.  As I said before, and as [[WP:COPYPASTE#How about copy-pasting from one Wikipedia article to another?|this guideline]] would attest, \"''if you just want to change the title of an article do not copy-paste \u2013 use the [[Help:Move|move tool]] or make a request at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] instead.''\"  My revert was not about which spelling is the best, it was about our licensing requirements, preserving the history of the contributions, and proper procedure.  You are welcome to move the article to whatever title you think works best, just please do it properly and not via a copy-paste move.  If you need assistance with the technical side of this procedure, please let me know, I'll be happy to help.  Best,\u2014 +++$+++ ::Aleksandr, I have no opinion regarding whether the current spelling is proper or improper nor am I, frankly, too interested in finding out what the best title for this article should be.  However, what most certainly ''is'' improper is the way you went about changing the title.  As I said before, and as [[WP:COPYPASTE#How about copy-pasting from one Wikipedia article to another?|this guideline]] would attest, "''if you just want to change the title of an article do not copy-paste – use the [[Help:Move|move tool]] or make a request at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] instead.''"  My revert was not about which spelling is the best, it was about our licensing requirements, preserving the history of the contributions, and proper procedure.  You are welcome to move the article to whatever title you think works best, just please do it properly and not via a copy-paste move.  If you need assistance with the technical side of this procedure, please let me know, I'll be happy to help.  Best,—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); 15:22, December&nbsp;22, 2009 (UTC)
14685 +++$+++ Ezhiki +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14682 +++$+++ 14683 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thank you for that.\u2014 +++$+++ ::Thank you for that.—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); 15:28, December&nbsp;22, 2009 (UTC)
14686 +++$+++ Garik 11 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14682 +++$+++ 14685 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.270829460E09 +++$+++ Aleksandr, I have reverted some of your copy-paste moves like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mikhail_Tugan-Baranovsky&diff=prev&oldid=354914521 this]. Please do not start doing that again.  +++$+++ :::Aleksandr, I have reverted some of your copy-paste moves like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikhail_Tugan-Baranovsky&diff=prev&oldid=354914521 this]. Please do not start doing that again. [[User:Garik 11|Garik 11]] ([[User talk:Garik 11|talk]]) 09:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

538973 +++$+++ LDingley +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-31 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.154392440E09 +++$+++ Dear Todor, on [[Eastern Orthodox Church]] you placed a very beautiful photo of Bulgarian monastery. Thanks a lot. Do you have any photos of [[Bachkovo Monastery]]? Thanks in advance.  +++$+++ Dear Todor, on [[Eastern Orthodox Church]] you placed a very beautiful photo of Bulgarian monastery. Thanks a lot. Do you have any photos of [[Bachkovo Monastery]]? Thanks in advance. [[User:Ldingley|Ldingley]] 17:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
538974 +++$+++ LDingley +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538973 +++$+++ 538973 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.154394060E09 +++$+++ Todor, thanks a lot. You should really be proud of such magnificent monasteries. Those photos are amazing. Its my dream to visit both monasteries. I visited many churches and monasteries in [[Georgia(country)|Georgia]] and [[Armenia]]. Thanks again Todor! All the best.  +++$+++ : Todor, thanks a lot. You should really be proud of such magnificent monasteries. Those photos are amazing. Its my dream to visit both monasteries. I visited many churches and monasteries in [[Georgia(country)|Georgia]] and [[Armenia]]. Thanks again Todor! All the best. [[User:Ldingley|Ldingley]] 18:01, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
538975 +++$+++ LDingley +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538973 +++$+++ 538974 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.154395680E09 +++$+++ Tobor, Bulgarians have very old and interesting History. I was studying the period about Bulgarian resistance against Byzantine hegemony (especially of Basil II), and killing of 15,000 Bulgarians by the treacherous Byzantine generals. Bochkovo is a typical Georgian church and probably Bakuriani (the architect) celebrated the glory of Georgian Christianity in design of the monastery. He actually forbade Greeks to enter his monastery due to the reason that Greeks tend to destroy what is not Greek. Georgians have very old churches and most of them have autocephalous architecture from Byzantians or Slavs. Byzantine emperors always tried to destroy Georgian churches and force Georgian kings to build only Byzantine stile. However, I can clearly see huge Byzantine influence on Bulgarian churches (exam. Nevsky Church in Sofia). When Basil killed 15,000 Bulgarians, he then invaded Tao (eastern Georgian province) to fight fellow orthodox Georgians. I never understood that. We should also add Bulgarian icons to the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]] article. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Tobor, Bulgarians have very old and interesting History. I was studying the period about Bulgarian resistance against Byzantine hegemony (especially of Basil II), and killing of 15,000 Bulgarians by the treacherous Byzantine generals. Bochkovo is a typical Georgian church and probably Bakuriani (the architect) celebrated the glory of Georgian Christianity in design of the monastery. He actually forbade Greeks to enter his monastery due to the reason that Greeks tend to destroy what is not Greek. Georgians have very old churches and most of them have autocephalous architecture from Byzantians or Slavs. Byzantine emperors always tried to destroy Georgian churches and force Georgian kings to build only Byzantine stile. However, I can clearly see huge Byzantine influence on Bulgarian churches (exam. Nevsky Church in Sofia). When Basil killed 15,000 Bulgarians, he then invaded Tao (eastern Georgian province) to fight fellow orthodox Georgians. I never understood that. We should also add Bulgarian icons to the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]] article. Thanks. [[User:Ldingley|Ldingley]] 18:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
538976 +++$+++ LDingley +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538973 +++$+++ 538975 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.154397780E09 +++$+++ Todor, I knew about the blinding of the Bulgarians. It was very treacherous indeed. You should read this article [[Byzantine-Georgian wars]]. Bochkovo\u2019s architect Bakuriani was a count in Georgia. He traveled to Bulgaria in order to build monastery there under the request of Georgian King. I don\u2019t know many things from his biography but I can find out from sources. Bochkovo\u2019s location is very beautiful. We should have a least one bulgarian icon in the orthodox article. The only ones I see there are Russian.  +++$+++ :::Todor, I knew about the blinding of the Bulgarians. It was very treacherous indeed. You should read this article [[Byzantine-Georgian wars]]. Bochkovo’s architect Bakuriani was a count in Georgia. He traveled to Bulgaria in order to build monastery there under the request of Georgian King. I don’t know many things from his biography but I can find out from sources. Bochkovo’s location is very beautiful. We should have a least one bulgarian icon in the orthodox article. The only ones I see there are Russian. [[User:Ldingley|Ldingley]] 19:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
538977 +++$+++ LDingley +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.154478900E09 +++$+++ Todor, Please review [[Eastern Orthodox Church]]. I change the photo of Rila. If you dont like it, please change it back. Thanks  +++$+++ ::::: Todor, Please review [[Eastern Orthodox Church]]. I change the photo of Rila. If you dont like it, please change it back. Thanks [[User:Ldingley|Ldingley]] 17:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
538978 +++$+++ LDingley +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.154479560E09 +++$+++ I purchase many photos (I do journalistic work in E. Europe). Those which are purchased by me are my property and I can release their rights. The author was not indicated by the seller (as it is their right). I have about 120 photos of Bulgaria, which are copyrighted to me and only I can release them under the contract which I have with the seller company (gettimages, eye of Georgia, etc).  +++$+++ :::::: I purchase many photos (I do journalistic work in E. Europe). Those which are purchased by me are my property and I can release their rights. The author was not indicated by the seller (as it is their right). I have about 120 photos of Bulgaria, which are copyrighted to me and only I can release them under the contract which I have with the seller company (gettimages, eye of Georgia, etc). [[User:Ldingley|Ldingley]] 17:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

445670 +++$+++ Omnibus170 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-27 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.309237920E09 +++$+++ Sphilbrick, I am very encouraged.  Thank you!  Delighted to work with you on the Mary Cunningham Agee article.  To be truthful, I had to look up \"hagiographic.\"  I am fascinated that this is the theme you picked up on. It would not be NPOV to write that many people from little folks to international leaders consider Ms. Agee to be a living saint - even though it happens to be true.  Her work, who she really is, what gets her up and going every day IS a servant's heart. She met with Mother Teresa in college. She was for all intents and purposes raised by a wonderful priest who founded the first Aquinas House among the Ivy League colleges.  She could have easily been a nun.  Instead, she went to Wellesley and HBS, worked her tail off, bashed her blonde head through the glass ceiling in the 80's - which was not pleasing to the good old boys network in Detroit - and ended up in all the national papers accused for the oldest crime in history.  Silly now.  But life was different in the 80's and women in upper management were a threat to the establishment.  She landed on her feet after the Bendix media circus, was highly successful with Seagram's and then walked away from it all to found and run an international charity (for 25 years) that has empowered thousands of women when nobody was there for them.  She is a women\u2019s activist whose mission is peace. Her message through the years (hands on) has been about healing, compassion, hope, tangible not theoretical help, communicating respectfully, finding a common ground.  She is brilliant, articulate, passionate and sacrificial. (Not NPOV, I understand, but true nonetheless.) She has had a private audience with Pope and collaborates with everyone from James Dobson to the late Eunice Kennedy Shriver (founding TNN Board Member) to the late John Cardinal O\u2019Connor to countless University Presidents. So much in the article is understated that it is hard for me to reduce it further and still tell her story.  For this reason alone, I look forward to working with you.  With your experience and independent insights, we\u2019ll get it right. Count me in.  +++$+++ Sphilbrick, I am very encouraged.  Thank you!  Delighted to work with you on the Mary Cunningham Agee article.  To be truthful, I had to look up "hagiographic."  I am fascinated that this is the theme you picked up on. It would not be NPOV to write that many people from little folks to international leaders consider Ms. Agee to be a living saint - even though it happens to be true.  Her work, who she really is, what gets her up and going every day IS a servant's heart. She met with Mother Teresa in college. She was for all intents and purposes raised by a wonderful priest who founded the first Aquinas House among the Ivy League colleges.  She could have easily been a nun.  Instead, she went to Wellesley and HBS, worked her tail off, bashed her blonde head through the glass ceiling in the 80's - which was not pleasing to the good old boys network in Detroit - and ended up in all the national papers accused for the oldest crime in history.  Silly now.  But life was different in the 80's and women in upper management were a threat to the establishment.  She landed on her feet after the Bendix media circus, was highly successful with Seagram's and then walked away from it all to found and run an international charity (for 25 years) that has empowered thousands of women when nobody was there for them.  She is a women’s activist whose mission is peace. Her message through the years (hands on) has been about healing, compassion, hope, tangible not theoretical help, communicating respectfully, finding a common ground.  She is brilliant, articulate, passionate and sacrificial. (Not NPOV, I understand, but true nonetheless.) She has had a private audience with Pope and collaborates with everyone from James Dobson to the late Eunice Kennedy Shriver (founding TNN Board Member) to the late John Cardinal O’Connor to countless University Presidents. So much in the article is understated that it is hard for me to reduce it further and still tell her story.  For this reason alone, I look forward to working with you.  With your experience and independent insights, we’ll get it right. Count me in. [[User:Omnibus170|Omnibus170]] ([[User talk:Omnibus170|talk]]) 22:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
445671 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445670 +++$+++ 445670 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.309238340E09 +++$+++ I hope you are as pleased with me after you see what I have to say:) I was checking into some refernce issues - while it is decidedly not a requirement that references be online, you can understand that it is easier for online readers if such online references exist. In one case, I found an online reference, but there are some technical questions whether it is preferable to use it; that' kind of cryptic, but I'll follow up on that later. I'll work on a list of points I find troubling, and we can try to sort them out.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ :I hope you are as pleased with me after you see what I have to say:) I was checking into some refernce issues - while it is decidedly not a requirement that references be online, you can understand that it is easier for online readers if such online references exist. In one case, I found an online reference, but there are some technical questions whether it is preferable to use it; that' kind of cryptic, but I'll follow up on that later. I'll work on a list of points I find troubling, and we can try to sort them out.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 22:19, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
445672 +++$+++ Ling.Nut2 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445670 +++$+++ 445671 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.309293720E09 +++$+++ Ack, forgive me for butting in. You '''prefer''' online refs? Yukky. The Internet sucks. It is not peer-reviewed. Anyone can say anything. Give me peer-reviewed journals or books by established editors\/publishers every single time. Please think twice before saying that online refs are preferred. Reliability is always and everywhere '''strongly''' preferred over convenience. &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp; +++$+++ :* Ack, forgive me for butting in. You '''prefer''' online refs? Yukky. The Internet sucks. It is not peer-reviewed. Anyone can say anything. Give me peer-reviewed journals or books by established editors/publishers every single time. Please think twice before saying that online refs are preferred. Reliability is always and everywhere '''strongly''' preferred over convenience. &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut2|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut2|Nut]] 13:42, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
445673 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445670 +++$+++ 445672 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.309295040E09 +++$+++ I always want high quality sources, and agree that high quality sources are often not available online. However, given that one has selected a particular source as a citation, it is often the case that the source is available both in printed form and online.  When this is the case, I prefer that an online reference be included. Of course, online links can go bad, so the ideal situation is a fully formed citation which can identify the printed version, along with url which may provide quick access. My response was prompted by noting several references without urls, including references to the New York Times, which I would expect to be able to find online.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ :::I always want high quality sources, and agree that high quality sources are often not available online. However, given that one has selected a particular source as a citation, it is often the case that the source is available both in printed form and online.  When this is the case, I prefer that an online reference be included. Of course, online links can go bad, so the ideal situation is a fully formed citation which can identify the printed version, along with url which may provide quick access. My response was prompted by noting several references without urls, including references to the New York Times, which I would expect to be able to find online.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 14:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
445674 +++$+++ Ling.Nut2 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445670 +++$+++ 445670 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.309295340E09 +++$+++ I have an [[Kaoliang|excuse for my obtuseness]]. &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp; +++$+++ * I have an [[Kaoliang|excuse for my obtuseness]]. &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut2|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut2|Nut]] 14:09, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
445675 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445670 +++$+++ 445674 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.309297680E09 +++$+++ Heh I'd like to join you.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::Heh I'd like to join you.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 14:48, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
445676 +++$+++ Ling.Nut2 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445670 +++$+++ 445675 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.310156340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the beer. I could use many, many more than merely one. &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp; +++$+++ ::*Thanks for the beer. I could use many, many more than merely one. &nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut2|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut2|Nut]] 13:19, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

46139 +++$+++ Vossman +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46139 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-18 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.300442400E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Vossman|vossman]] ([[User talk:Vossman|talk]]) 03:00, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
46140 +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46139 +++$+++ 46139 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.300446180E09 +++$+++ I see, at [[Capsid#T-number]]. I'll look more when I get a chance. Are there other forms that can be generated? Do you have sample images? This Jscript can generate many from a seed icosahedral symmetry (I) with topological rules applied: [http:\/\/www.georgehart.com\/virtual-polyhedra\/conway_notation.html].  +++$+++ : I see, at [[Capsid#T-number]]. I'll look more when I get a chance. Are there other forms that can be generated? Do you have sample images? This Jscript can generate many from a seed icosahedral symmetry (I) with topological rules applied: [http://www.georgehart.com/virtual-polyhedra/conway_notation.html]. [[User:Tomruen|Tom Ruen]] ([[User talk:Tomruen#top|talk]]) 04:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
46141 +++$+++ Vossman +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46139 +++$+++ 46140 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.300491000E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I forgot the link. I added some of the Conway notations. Need to think more about the others. What program do you use to render the surfaces? -- +++$+++ ::Sorry, I forgot the link. I added some of the Conway notations. Need to think more about the others. What program do you use to render the surfaces? --[[User:Vossman|vossman]] ([[User talk:Vossman|talk]]) 16:30, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
46142 +++$+++ Tamfang +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46139 +++$+++ 46139 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.300491780E09 +++$+++ See http:\/\/antiprism.com\/programs\/geodesic.html \u2014 +++$+++ : See http://antiprism.com/programs/geodesic.html —[[User:Tamfang|Tamfang]] ([[User talk:Tamfang|talk]]) 16:43, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

276836 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276836 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-14 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.179161160E09 +++$+++ I would like you to look again at [[Bushy]] and reconsider [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Bushy|your vote]]. I have rewritten the article from scratch using [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Thanks! -- +++$+++ I would like you to look again at [[Bushy]] and reconsider [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bushy|your vote]]. I have rewritten the article from scratch using [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Thanks! --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 09:46, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
276837 +++$+++ EdGl +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276836 +++$+++ 276836 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.179199740E09 +++$+++ I ''happily'' changed my vote. Thanks for greatly improving the article. \u2192 +++$+++ :I ''happily'' changed my vote. Thanks for greatly improving the article. →[[User:EdGl|<span style="color:#773">Ed</span>]][[User_talk:EdGl|<span style="color:#359">Gl</span>]] 20:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

538982 +++$+++ Rater +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-02 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.154551440E09 +++$+++ I am not a sockpuppet of ElevatedStork. Please remove the sockpuppet tag from my page.  +++$+++ I am not a sockpuppet of ElevatedStork. Please remove the sockpuppet tag from my page. [[User:Rater|Rater]] 13:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
538983 +++$+++ Rater +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538982 +++$+++ 538982 +++$+++ 2006-08-02 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.154551800E09 +++$+++ What was what? Simply, ElevatedStork sent me a message in my old account, but I forgot my password. So I created a new account. But I am not ElevatedStork, neither ElevatedStork is me.  +++$+++ : What was what? Simply, ElevatedStork sent me a message in my old account, but I forgot my password. So I created a new account. But I am not ElevatedStork, neither ElevatedStork is me. [[User:Rater|Rater]] 13:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

276839 +++$+++ John Spikowski +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-19 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.179578700E09 +++$+++ If you can help solve and close this issue it would be apprciated.  +++$+++ If you can help solve and close this issue it would be apprciated. [[User:John Spikowski|John Spikowski]] 05:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
276840 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276839 +++$+++ 276839 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.179579540E09 +++$+++ I'll add a hatnote to both articles to show how that works. I have no idea what you mean by \"a business listing page\", by the way; there is no such thing in Wikipedia, as all articles are just articles. I apologize if I sounded annoyed, but I very much appreciate that you are asking questions. It's the best way to learn (and one I'm not as good at). -- +++$+++ :I'll add a hatnote to both articles to show how that works. I have no idea what you mean by "a business listing page", by the way; there is no such thing in Wikipedia, as all articles are just articles. I apologize if I sounded annoyed, but I very much appreciate that you are asking questions. It's the best way to learn (and one I'm not as good at). --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 05:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
276841 +++$+++ John Spikowski +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276839 +++$+++ 276839 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 08:40:00 +++$+++ 1.179589200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for cleaning up the mess! Not sure why \"Panorama Software LTD.\" should have a page on the Wikipedia anyways. It was deleted once before. Sure looks like a \"business listing\" to me.  +++$+++ :Thanks for cleaning up the mess! Not sure why "Panorama Software LTD." should have a page on the Wikipedia anyways. It was deleted once before. Sure looks like a "business listing" to me. [[User:John Spikowski|John Spikowski]] 08:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

281077 +++$+++ GoldenGoose100 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-02 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.225678560E09 +++$+++ Please see the history page [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Jo-Wilfried_Tsonga&action=history here] to see my explanation. Thanks for contributing. If you want to discuss, please reply. ~  +++$+++ Please see the history page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jo-Wilfried_Tsonga&action=history here] to see my explanation. Thanks for contributing. If you want to discuss, please reply. ~ [[User:GoldenGoose100|GoldenGoose100]] ([[User talk:GoldenGoose100|talk]]) 18:16, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
281078 +++$+++ GoldenGoose100 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281077 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-02 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.225681740E09 +++$+++ Alright - you have a good point there. But trust me, for example Djokovic fans would be absolutely frustrated to see \"tasted revenge\" on a wikipedia article. This is not a blog. It's not supposed to be exciting, or gripping, or like sports journalism. I love Tsonga too, but it's just the way it's done here. I'm going to restore your quote now and we'll see if people take it down. You might want to add a note about it on the talk page of Tsonga just in case, explaining like you did on my page about the whole maiden tour win thing. Because this is an impressive victory, and a milestone in his tennis career and life. Peace out ~  +++$+++ ::Alright - you have a good point there. But trust me, for example Djokovic fans would be absolutely frustrated to see "tasted revenge" on a wikipedia article. This is not a blog. It's not supposed to be exciting, or gripping, or like sports journalism. I love Tsonga too, but it's just the way it's done here. I'm going to restore your quote now and we'll see if people take it down. You might want to add a note about it on the talk page of Tsonga just in case, explaining like you did on my page about the whole maiden tour win thing. Because this is an impressive victory, and a milestone in his tennis career and life. Peace out ~ [[User:GoldenGoose100|GoldenGoose100]] ([[User talk:GoldenGoose100|talk]]) 19:09, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
281079 +++$+++ GoldenGoose100 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281077 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-02 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.225682640E09 +++$+++ Actually - no. I reread the version of Tsonga's article that had your quote - and when I said I'd restore it now, I thought this quote was for the whole tournament now that he won. This quotation you gave apparently is a response to his win over Djokovic. I think you may be too focused on this \"revenge\" against Djokovic. It is impressive his wins this tournament yes - beat Djokovic, Roddick, Blake, Nalbandian - all within the top 10 at some point - but it's not notable to talk about his comments to Djokovic. It is good that he has pride in doing well in Bercy, but I don't think it cuts it to qualify for a wikipedia article. I hope that made sense lol. Quotes like that are for http:\/\/www.bnpparibasmasters.org\/ for example. Peace ~  +++$+++ ::::Actually - no. I reread the version of Tsonga's article that had your quote - and when I said I'd restore it now, I thought this quote was for the whole tournament now that he won. This quotation you gave apparently is a response to his win over Djokovic. I think you may be too focused on this "revenge" against Djokovic. It is impressive his wins this tournament yes - beat Djokovic, Roddick, Blake, Nalbandian - all within the top 10 at some point - but it's not notable to talk about his comments to Djokovic. It is good that he has pride in doing well in Bercy, but I don't think it cuts it to qualify for a wikipedia article. I hope that made sense lol. Quotes like that are for http://www.bnpparibasmasters.org/ for example. Peace ~ [[User:GoldenGoose100|GoldenGoose100]] ([[User talk:GoldenGoose100|talk]]) 19:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
281080 +++$+++ GoldenGoose100 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281077 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-02 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.225684320E09 +++$+++ :( ~  +++$+++ :::::: :( ~ [[User:GoldenGoose100|GoldenGoose100]] ([[User talk:GoldenGoose100|talk]]) 19:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

14698 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14698 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-20 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.269146340E09 +++$+++ The national team is allways primary in the nationality choice... Only if players didn\xb4t played for national teams there can be options. Regards.  +++$+++ The national team is allways primary in the nationality choice... Only if players didn´t played for national teams there can be options. Regards. [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 21:39, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
14699 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14698 +++$+++ 14698 +++$+++ 2010-03-20 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.269147840E09 +++$+++ I knew that, but we are talking about a footballer mainly, and I\xb4m sorry, but the wikipedia football related biographies have been donne that way, and I agree. Marko Devi\u0107 is Ukranian footballer (Unkranian international, of Serb origin) and Vladimir Di\u0161ljenkovi\u0107 is Serbian footballer (Serbian international, with Ukranian citizenship) and Yekaterina the Great is Russian because she was \"Russian\" statesman, same as Disljenkovic Serbian national team former player. And Disljenkovic or Devic are not Serbian-Ukranian or Ukranian-Serbian players, but Serbian (Disljenkovic) and Ukranian (Devic).  +++$+++ :I knew that, but we are talking about a footballer mainly, and I´m sorry, but the wikipedia football related biographies have been donne that way, and I agree. Marko Dević is Ukranian footballer (Unkranian international, of Serb origin) and Vladimir Dišljenković is Serbian footballer (Serbian international, with Ukranian citizenship) and Yekaterina the Great is Russian because she was "Russian" statesman, same as Disljenkovic Serbian national team former player. And Disljenkovic or Devic are not Serbian-Ukranian or Ukranian-Serbian players, but Serbian (Disljenkovic) and Ukranian (Devic). [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 22:04, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

276843 +++$+++ Richfife +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276843 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.179792000E09 +++$+++ I can't figure out what the term means, but it's piqued my interest, so I'll bite.  What's an Arbuthnot?  Thanks! -  +++$+++ I can't figure out what the term means, but it's piqued my interest, so I'll bite.  What's an Arbuthnot?  Thanks! - [[User:Richfife|Richfife]] 17:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
276844 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276843 +++$+++ 276843 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.179800100E09 +++$+++ See the AFD history of {{user|Kittybrewster}} for background. Uncle G seems to think my remark was personal, but it was just intended to be comparative. -- +++$+++ :See the AFD history of {{user|Kittybrewster}} for background. Uncle G seems to think my remark was personal, but it was just intended to be comparative. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 19:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
276845 +++$+++ Richfife +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276843 +++$+++ 276844 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.179801780E09 +++$+++ Got it!  Thanks! -  +++$+++ :: Got it!  Thanks! - [[User:Richfife|Richfife]] 19:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

14700 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14700 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-20 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.269149040E09 +++$+++ Thanx for supporting Serbia, but I am doing that edit because wikipedia articles are donne that way, and not because I like it, or not... :)  +++$+++ Thanx for supporting Serbia, but I am doing that edit because wikipedia articles are donne that way, and not because I like it, or not... :) [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 22:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
14701 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14700 +++$+++ 14700 +++$+++ 2010-03-20 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.269150900E09 +++$+++ I also participated in that debate because I wanted to know exactly which nationality to consider the players for multiple nationalities cases for the lists of foreign players in different contries and leagues.  +++$+++ :I also participated in that debate because I wanted to know exactly which nationality to consider the players for multiple nationalities cases for the lists of foreign players in different contries and leagues. [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 22:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

14702 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-20 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.269152760E09 +++$+++ But we can\xb4t avoid it here. Disljenkovic did play for a national team, and only rare cases of players without country, or something like that, could maybe have the nationality abscent... Please, he played for the Serbian national team, spend most of his career as Serbian, and only now, at the end of his career, when he was already told by the national team coach that he may not be selected for the World Cup, that he opted for changing nationality for Ukranian, so he wan\xb4t count as foreigner while playing in Ukraine... There is nothing wrong or polemical about it. And the fact that he posseses Ukranian passport is adequatly mentioned in the article.  +++$+++ But we can´t avoid it here. Disljenkovic did play for a national team, and only rare cases of players without country, or something like that, could maybe have the nationality abscent... Please, he played for the Serbian national team, spend most of his career as Serbian, and only now, at the end of his career, when he was already told by the national team coach that he may not be selected for the World Cup, that he opted for changing nationality for Ukranian, so he wan´t count as foreigner while playing in Ukraine... There is nothing wrong or polemical about it. And the fact that he posseses Ukranian passport is adequatly mentioned in the article. [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 23:26, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
14703 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14702 +++$+++ 14702 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.269154980E09 +++$+++ About the words said in the page, don\xb4t warry, this kind of vandalism is unfortunatelly not that uncomun here... In this case the meaning of \"Ciganska\" doesn\xb4t mean Gypsy in perjorative sense, but Red Star Belgrade fan, as they are called \"Cigani\" - \"Gypsies\", and he was a Red Star player. Picka is another story :) But that is not sefinitelly what most people feel about him, that reflects a view of a few ignorant kids (I beleve). This guys don\xb4t understand that for Disljenkovic, sitting in the bench of a NT, or worse, not even be called, it is just not worth it anymore...  +++$+++ :About the words said in the page, don´t warry, this kind of vandalism is unfortunatelly not that uncomun here... In this case the meaning of "Ciganska" doesn´t mean Gypsy in perjorative sense, but Red Star Belgrade fan, as they are called "Cigani" - "Gypsies", and he was a Red Star player. Picka is another story :) But that is not sefinitelly what most people feel about him, that reflects a view of a few ignorant kids (I beleve). This guys don´t understand that for Disljenkovic, sitting in the bench of a NT, or worse, not even be called, it is just not worth it anymore... [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 00:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
14704 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14702 +++$+++ 14702 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.269155760E09 +++$+++ Personally, me, and many people from Serbia agree, don\xb4t simpatize much with Stojkovic, and an experient and great goalkeeper like Disljenkovic would be the best solution, but Stojkovic must have some strong backing up (he doesn\xb4t even played with at club level in many periods, and he was allways the favourite).  +++$+++ :Personally, me, and many people from Serbia agree, don´t simpatize much with Stojkovic, and an experient and great goalkeeper like Disljenkovic would be the best solution, but Stojkovic must have some strong backing up (he doesn´t even played with at club level in many periods, and he was allways the favourite). [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 00:16, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
14705 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14702 +++$+++ 14704 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.269158160E09 +++$+++ But you know now: a player can be Tunguzian with Tanzanian passport, if he played for England, he is English footballer...  +++$+++ ::But you know now: a player can be Tunguzian with Tanzanian passport, if he played for England, he is English footballer... [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 00:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

538991 +++$+++ 5ko +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-08 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.155043800E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0439! \u0421\u0435\u0433\u0430 \u0432\u0438\u0436\u0434\u0430\u043c \u043a\u043e\u043b\u043a\u043e \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434 \u0445\u0432\u044a\u0440\u043b\u044f\u0448, \u0438 \u043a\u043e\u043b\u043a\u043e \u0445\u0443\u0431\u0430\u0432\u0438 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0431\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u0442\u0435\u043c\u0438 \u0441\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043b \u0438\/\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0432\u0435\u043b! \u0411\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u044a\u043b\u0436\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0439 \u0432 \u0441\u044a\u0449\u0438\u044f \u0434\u0443\u0445! \u0421 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432! -- +++$+++ Здравей! Сега виждам колко много труд хвърляш, и колко хубави статии на български теми си написал и/или превел! Браво и продължавай в същия дух! С поздрав! --[[User:5ko|5ko]] 06:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
538992 +++$+++ Cameltrader +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538991 +++$+++ 538991 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.155059640E09 +++$+++ \u0427\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u043e \u0438 \u043e\u0442 \u043c\u0435\u043d :) \u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0438 \u043d\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0448 \u0437\u0430\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u0433\u0440\u0430\u0434\u0430 \u0441\u044a\u0441 \u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435 -- +++$+++ :Честито и от мен :) и да си носиш заслужената награда със здраве --[[User:Cameltrader|Cameltrader]] 10:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

276848 +++$+++ 81.210.132.21 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276848 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-26 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.180216500E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid you were rather stupid to renew the deletion campaign against Heim Theory.  You should have read the discussion from the first deletion campaign in 2006 September, and\/or the extensive discussion in the HT talk pages. Then it would be apparent that the grounds you gave had NOTHING  NEW and thus your action was mischievous and incorrect. You are accordingly receiving a solid trouncing in this campaign and rightly so. -- +++$+++ I'm afraid you were rather stupid to renew the deletion campaign against Heim Theory.  You should have read the discussion from the first deletion campaign in 2006 September, and/or the extensive discussion in the HT talk pages. Then it would be apparent that the grounds you gave had NOTHING  NEW and thus your action was mischievous and incorrect. You are accordingly receiving a solid trouncing in this campaign and rightly so. --[[User:81.210.132.21|81.210.132.21]] 14:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
276849 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276848 +++$+++ 276848 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.180224600E09 +++$+++ I did nothing other than create a new page for discussion, in order to properly complete the nomination. I offered no opinion. I do not appreciate the [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] you are making. (I assume you [[WP:SOCK|logged out]] in order to make them anonymously. You do know that it's possible to match your username and your IP address, right?) -- +++$+++ :I did nothing other than create a new page for discussion, in order to properly complete the nomination. I offered no opinion. I do not appreciate the [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] you are making. (I assume you [[WP:SOCK|logged out]] in order to make them anonymously. You do know that it's possible to match your username and your IP address, right?) --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 17:10, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

14706 +++$+++ Necronudist +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-21 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.269189180E09 +++$+++ Hi Aleksandr! Sorry to disturb you, but I have a little question about Ukrainian names at USSR times and I think you can clear my doubts: a person born in the Ukrainian SSR had his name on his [[birth certificate]]\/[[Register office|register office entry]] (or whatever used to record births in the UkSSR) written in Ukrainian Cyrillic or Russian Cyrillic? Priority was given to Russian, I suppose... so, for example, [[Andriy Shevchenko]] was born ''\u0410\u043d\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0439 \u041d\u0438\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0430\u0435\u0432\u0438\u0447 \u0428\u0435\u0432\u0447\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e'' and not ''\u0410\u043d\u0434\u0440\u0456\u0439 \u041c\u0438\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0430\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447 \u0428\u0435\u0432\u0447\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e''. Am I right? Do you know how it worked in the other [[Republics of the Soviet Union|Soviet Republics]]? Thank you really much...! -- +++$+++ Hi Aleksandr! Sorry to disturb you, but I have a little question about Ukrainian names at USSR times and I think you can clear my doubts: a person born in the Ukrainian SSR had his name on his [[birth certificate]]/[[Register office|register office entry]] (or whatever used to record births in the UkSSR) written in Ukrainian Cyrillic or Russian Cyrillic? Priority was given to Russian, I suppose... so, for example, [[Andriy Shevchenko]] was born ''Андрей Николаевич Шевченко'' and not ''Андрій Миколайович Шевченко''. Am I right? Do you know how it worked in the other [[Republics of the Soviet Union|Soviet Republics]]? Thank you really much...! --[[User:Necronudist|necronudist]] ([[User talk:Necronudist|talk]]) 09:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
14707 +++$+++ Necronudist +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14706 +++$+++ 14706 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.269209940E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the useful explanation, Aleksandr. So the \"native\" habits of the SSR's people were respected. Does this also mean that the use of the patronymic wasn't forced in Republics where it isn't part of the local customs? (e.g.: Baltic states). If you know, obviously. Thank you really much anyway! -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the useful explanation, Aleksandr. So the "native" habits of the SSR's people were respected. Does this also mean that the use of the patronymic wasn't forced in Republics where it isn't part of the local customs? (e.g.: Baltic states). If you know, obviously. Thank you really much anyway! --[[User:Necronudist|necronudist]] ([[User talk:Necronudist|talk]]) 15:19, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
14708 +++$+++ Necronudist +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14706 +++$+++ 14707 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.269211680E09 +++$+++ Sure but... was the patronymic compulsory? -- +++$+++ ::Sure but... was the patronymic compulsory? --[[User:Necronudist|necronudist]] ([[User talk:Necronudist|talk]]) 15:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
14709 +++$+++ Necronudist +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14706 +++$+++ 14708 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.269214140E09 +++$+++ There's no need to be free will oppressors to declare patronymic compulsory... it's only a matter of standards and bureaucracy. Since USSR was an higly bureaucratic state, I thought patronymic and Russian naming customs were compulsory (okay, even alongside \"local\" customs). I'm not a Soviet Union expert (although I'm an amateur of linguistic and [[anthroponymy]])... that's why I asked :-P However, you've been really kind and your explanations are really interesting! Now I can easily guess that, e.g., [[Mart Poom]] was born both ''Mart Poom'' and ''\u041c\u0430\u0440\u0442 \u041f\u043e\u043e\u043c'' 'cause in Soviet Union's birth official documents were used both local scripts and Russian Cyrillic. -- +++$+++ :::There's no need to be free will oppressors to declare patronymic compulsory... it's only a matter of standards and bureaucracy. Since USSR was an higly bureaucratic state, I thought patronymic and Russian naming customs were compulsory (okay, even alongside "local" customs). I'm not a Soviet Union expert (although I'm an amateur of linguistic and [[anthroponymy]])... that's why I asked :-P However, you've been really kind and your explanations are really interesting! Now I can easily guess that, e.g., [[Mart Poom]] was born both ''Mart Poom'' and ''Март Поом'' 'cause in Soviet Union's birth official documents were used both local scripts and Russian Cyrillic. --[[User:Necronudist|necronudist]] ([[User talk:Necronudist|talk]]) 16:29, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

538996 +++$+++ Cameltrader +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538996 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-08 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.155097320E09 +++$+++ Ideally, we would use SVG or something and forget about scaling. I'll do some more experimenting (in a separate temporary template) - I hope we can get something out of thumbs. And just for comparison - the general \"City Infobox\" template uses a 100px width. The German one uses 135px, which I mistook for the standard. -- +++$+++ Ideally, we would use SVG or something and forget about scaling. I'll do some more experimenting (in a separate temporary template) - I hope we can get something out of thumbs. And just for comparison - the general "City Infobox" template uses a 100px width. The German one uses 135px, which I mistook for the standard. --[[User:Cameltrader|Cameltrader]] 21:22, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
538997 +++$+++ Cameltrader +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538996 +++$+++ 538996 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.155098820E09 +++$+++ I'm sleepy, I'll continue into this tomorrow. -- +++$+++ :I'm sleepy, I'll continue into this tomorrow. --[[User:Cameltrader|Cameltrader]] 21:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

14710 +++$+++ Mibelz +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-22 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.269284220E09 +++$+++ Hi! A Russian wikipedist, [[User:Voyevoda|Voyevoda]], is still removing the most important facts and solid references, both Western and Ukrainian (not post-Soviet) ones, from the [[History of Kiev]]. I think, it is time to stop him. Do you know who is the admin of the page, and how to contact with him? -- Shalom,  +++$+++ Hi! A Russian wikipedist, [[User:Voyevoda|Voyevoda]], is still removing the most important facts and solid references, both Western and Ukrainian (not post-Soviet) ones, from the [[History of Kiev]]. I think, it is time to stop him. Do you know who is the admin of the page, and how to contact with him? -- Shalom, [[User:Mibelz|Mibelz]] ([[User talk:Mibelz|talk]]), PhD, 11:57, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
14711 +++$+++ Mibelz +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14710 +++$+++ 14710 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.269533340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your intervene. By the way, I was blocked for 12 hours by [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|\u263c]]. - Regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks for your intervene. By the way, I was blocked for 12 hours by [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]]. - Regards, [[User:Mibelz|Mibelz]] ([[User talk:Mibelz|talk]]), 09:09, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

538999 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538999 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-11 10:33:00 +++$+++ 1.155317580E09 +++$+++ Hi, ''anastenari'' is \u03b1\u03bd\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03bd\u03ac\u03c1\u03b9 in the Greek alphabet. Also, we have an article on it at the Greek Wikipedia: [[:el:\u0391\u03bd\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03bd\u03ac\u03c1\u03b9\u03b1]]. -- +++$+++ Hi, ''anastenari'' is αναστενάρι in the Greek alphabet. Also, we have an article on it at the Greek Wikipedia: [[:el:Αναστενάρια]]. --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 10:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
539000 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538999 +++$+++ 538999 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.155318060E09 +++$+++ BTW, have you seen the Macedonistic map at the bottom of [http:\/\/www.historyofmacedonia.org\/MacedonianMinorities\/MapMacedoniansinGreece.html this] page? I know that what it says about Bulgaria and Greece is complete bollocks, but they are also presenting areas which their own census found an ethnic Albanian majority as being ethnically Macedonian! -- +++$+++ :BTW, have you seen the Macedonistic map at the bottom of [http://www.historyofmacedonia.org/MacedonianMinorities/MapMacedoniansinGreece.html this] page? I know that what it says about Bulgaria and Greece is complete bollocks, but they are also presenting areas which their own census found an ethnic Albanian majority as being ethnically Macedonian! --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 10:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
539001 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538999 +++$+++ 539000 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.155332700E09 +++$+++ I also like the sharp boundaries of Blagoevgrad oblast. You would think there is a wall separating it from the rest of Bulgaria. Of course, that is due to the fact that according to Republican historians, Blagoevgrad province has historically had the purest Macedonian population.   +++$+++ ::I also like the sharp boundaries of Blagoevgrad oblast. You would think there is a wall separating it from the rest of Bulgaria. Of course, that is due to the fact that according to Republican historians, Blagoevgrad province has historically had the purest Macedonian population.  [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk_</b>&nbsp;</span>]] 14:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
539002 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538999 +++$+++ 539001 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.155341400E09 +++$+++ I think i made a mistake, when referring to this custom as been alive in Kozani. i mixed it with the ritual of ''kladaria'':p (a similar one). anyway, all the sources i found agree with yours, that it was brought in northern Greece by the Greeks of eastern Rumelia. The letter u showed me is very enlightening;). it says that the villages they came from are Costi and Brodilovo (from the area of Sozopole) and Vasiliko, Mitsiouri, Grammatiko and Mourtsovo (i am not sure what the names are in Bulgarian), and that they came in Greece in 3 waves in 1914, 1918 and 1923. it goes on saying that it first begun during the [[Iconoclasm]] period. according to the sources i found, the custom revives before Easter(Saracosti), on 15th August (to honour Theotokos), on 20th May (the night before the day of St. Constantine and St. Helen) and as this source says [http:\/\/www.agrotravel.gr\/agro\/site\/AgroTravel\/t_docpage?doc=\/Documents\/Agrotravel\/event\/serres\/anastenaria], also the day of St. Athanasius (18th January). Some say that its origins are not only Thracian, but that it also has Bacchic ([[Dionysus]]) origins, perhaps referring to the ecstasy of those who take part in it. in any case it really is a custom showing the common heritage of Greeks and Bulgarians;). i think that the names used to call it, also have common origin... i will move the greek name to the top of the article (if its ok with u) and write it in plural (since this is how the ritual is called. Ciao -- +++$+++ :::I think i made a mistake, when referring to this custom as been alive in Kozani. i mixed it with the ritual of ''kladaria'':p (a similar one). anyway, all the sources i found agree with yours, that it was brought in northern Greece by the Greeks of eastern Rumelia. The letter u showed me is very enlightening;). it says that the villages they came from are Costi and Brodilovo (from the area of Sozopole) and Vasiliko, Mitsiouri, Grammatiko and Mourtsovo (i am not sure what the names are in Bulgarian), and that they came in Greece in 3 waves in 1914, 1918 and 1923. it goes on saying that it first begun during the [[Iconoclasm]] period. according to the sources i found, the custom revives before Easter(Saracosti), on 15th August (to honour Theotokos), on 20th May (the night before the day of St. Constantine and St. Helen) and as this source says [http://www.agrotravel.gr/agro/site/AgroTravel/t_docpage?doc=/Documents/Agrotravel/event/serres/anastenaria], also the day of St. Athanasius (18th January). Some say that its origins are not only Thracian, but that it also has Bacchic ([[Dionysus]]) origins, perhaps referring to the ecstasy of those who take part in it. in any case it really is a custom showing the common heritage of Greeks and Bulgarians;). i think that the names used to call it, also have common origin... i will move the greek name to the top of the article (if its ok with u) and write it in plural (since this is how the ritual is called. Ciao --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 17:10, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
539003 +++$+++ Hectorian +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 538999 +++$+++ 539002 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.155345960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the info and the links! The design indeed seems a bit Gothic, or at least central-northern European, but not Balkan! I could assosiate the name with a greek root: ''anastenaria'' been the plural form of ''anastenari'' from modern greek ''ana+stenazo'' (''\u03b1\u03bd\u03ac+\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03bd\u03ac\u03b6\u03c9'') which in turns comes from the ancient greek ''\u03b1\u03bd\u03ac+\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03bd\u03cc\u03c9-\u03c9''. the Bulgarian name ''nestinarstvo'' seems quite similar, i think (i am not sure if it is pronounced the way it it written in the latin alphabet, though)... Concerning the dialect of the Greeks in the region, it could be, as u say, quite distinct from the dialect of the cities, since many modern greek dialects have varying degrees of intellegibility with standard greek and with one another.  but, without been an expert on the subject, i do not think that it was as distinct as [[Pontic Greek]] or [[Cappadocian Greek]], since it was spoken so close to Constantinoupoli and to the Greek mainland... btw, check your email. Regards -- +++$+++ ::::Thanks for the info and the links! The design indeed seems a bit Gothic, or at least central-northern European, but not Balkan! I could assosiate the name with a greek root: ''anastenaria'' been the plural form of ''anastenari'' from modern greek ''ana+stenazo'' (''ανά+στενάζω'') which in turns comes from the ancient greek ''ανά+στενόω-ω''. the Bulgarian name ''nestinarstvo'' seems quite similar, i think (i am not sure if it is pronounced the way it it written in the latin alphabet, though)... Concerning the dialect of the Greeks in the region, it could be, as u say, quite distinct from the dialect of the cities, since many modern greek dialects have varying degrees of intellegibility with standard greek and with one another.  but, without been an expert on the subject, i do not think that it was as distinct as [[Pontic Greek]] or [[Cappadocian Greek]], since it was spoken so close to Constantinoupoli and to the Greek mainland... btw, check your email. Regards --[[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]] 18:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

14712 +++$+++ Mibelz +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14712 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-26 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.269660360E09 +++$+++ - Warm Regards,  +++$+++ - Warm Regards, [[User:Mibelz|Mibelz]] ([[User talk:Mibelz|talk]]), 20:26, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
14713 +++$+++ Mibelz +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14712 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-26 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.269668880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reply. Yes, I know that [[Zhytomyr]] became the capital (seat) of the [[Kiev Voivodeship]] without Kiev, actually in 1667, and eventually in 1686, and remained until 1793 in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. -  +++$+++ ::Thanks for reply. Yes, I know that [[Zhytomyr]] became the capital (seat) of the [[Kiev Voivodeship]] without Kiev, actually in 1667, and eventually in 1686, and remained until 1793 in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. - [[User:Mibelz|Mibelz]] ([[User talk:Mibelz|talk]]), 22:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

14715 +++$+++ Graham87 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14715 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-27 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.269682380E09 +++$+++ Please share your thoughts at [[Talk:Global warming]], the place to discuss the article, not my talk page. Thanks. ''' +++$+++ Please share your thoughts at [[Talk:Global warming]], the place to discuss the article, not my talk page. Thanks. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 02:33, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
14716 +++$+++ ClueBot +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14715 +++$+++ 14715 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.269817260E09 +++$+++ The following is the log entry regarding this warning: [[Ukrainian Premier League 1992]] was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ukrainian+Premier+League+1992&diff=352552429&oldid=352482881 changed] by [[Special:Contributions\/Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|(u)]] [[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev|(t)]] deleting 16488 characters on 2010-03-28T16:01:24+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 577769 -->. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->  +++$+++ * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: [[Ukrainian Premier League 1992]] was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian+Premier+League+1992&diff=352552429&oldid=352482881 changed] by [[Special:Contributions/Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|(u)]] [[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev|(t)]] deleting 16488 characters on 2010-03-28T16:01:24+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 577769 -->. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> [[User:ClueBot|ClueBot]] ([[User talk:ClueBot|talk]]) 16:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

276861 +++$+++ Ephraim33 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276861 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-04 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.181009160E09 +++$+++ Hi Dan, you have written the article [[G33 (industrialized countries)]]. Where do you have the information from? Especially that the Philippines is a member, and not Saudi Arabia as it is written in the external link. -- +++$+++ Hi Dan, you have written the article [[G33 (industrialized countries)]]. Where do you have the information from? Especially that the Philippines is a member, and not Saudi Arabia as it is written in the external link. --[[User:Ephraim33|Ephraim33]] 19:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
276862 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276861 +++$+++ 276861 +++$+++ 2007-06-04 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.181016480E09 +++$+++ That was a \"split\" from the other G33 article [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=G33&diff=116732443&oldid=110806871 here]. I don't know if there is an official source, anymore. See the history of the other G33 article for where it probably came from. -- +++$+++ :That was a "split" from the other G33 article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=G33&diff=116732443&oldid=110806871 here]. I don't know if there is an official source, anymore. See the history of the other G33 article for where it probably came from. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 21:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
276863 +++$+++ Ephraim33 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276861 +++$+++ 276862 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.181055600E09 +++$+++ OK, I have removed the Philippines and added Saudi Arabia (see [http:\/\/www.imf.org\/external\/np\/exr\/facts\/groups.htm#G33 here]). By the way in commons there is a corrected map [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Image:G33countries.png Image:G33countries.png], with the same name as the map here ([[:Image:G33countries.png]]). Do you know how to show the commons-map in the article? -- +++$+++ ::OK, I have removed the Philippines and added Saudi Arabia (see [http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/groups.htm#G33 here]). By the way in commons there is a corrected map [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:G33countries.png Image:G33countries.png], with the same name as the map here ([[:Image:G33countries.png]]). Do you know how to show the commons-map in the article? --[[User:Ephraim33|Ephraim33]] 08:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

14718 +++$+++ Mariah-Yulia +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-31 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.270071120E09 +++$+++ Thanks [[File:Waving.png|25px]], I found [http:\/\/www.khpg.org\/en\/index.php?id=958890289 the 2000 numbers] googling with the numbers you gave me [[File:Smiley.svg|20px]]. \u2014 ''' +++$+++ Thanks [[File:Waving.png|25px]], I found [http://www.khpg.org/en/index.php?id=958890289 the 2000 numbers] googling with the numbers you gave me [[File:Smiley.svg|20px]]. — '''[[User:Mariah-Yulia|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:orange">Mariah-Yulia</span>]]'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:Mariah-Yulia|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:blue">Talk to me!</span>]] 14:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
14719 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14718 +++$+++ 14718 +++$+++ 2010-03-31 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.270073460E09 +++$+++ Nice! I could not even find the correctional department at the main MVS website. I know a little bit from history that in the Soviet times and earlier Imperial Russia, correctional department was a special directorate. During the Soviet times it changed hands between different Ministries due to poor managing (that is my own speculation). It was under close cooperation with MVS or [[NKVD]], yet a separate independent to a certain degree department. The correctional system in the former Soviet Union is still under certain degree of classification and the information about its activity is poorly disclosed to the public or not even at all.  +++$+++ :Nice! I could not even find the correctional department at the main MVS website. I know a little bit from history that in the Soviet times and earlier Imperial Russia, correctional department was a special directorate. During the Soviet times it changed hands between different Ministries due to poor managing (that is my own speculation). It was under close cooperation with MVS or [[NKVD]], yet a separate independent to a certain degree department. The correctional system in the former Soviet Union is still under certain degree of classification and the information about its activity is poorly disclosed to the public or not even at all. [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] ([[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev#top|talk]]) 15:11, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

539007 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539007 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-19 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.156055580E09 +++$+++ Hi.  At [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#RubberJoshy]], there is some concern that an editor has been adding information about non-existent Bulgarian telvision programmes.  Would you take a minute to look at it?   +++$+++ Hi.  At [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#RubberJoshy]], there is some concern that an editor has been adding information about non-existent Bulgarian telvision programmes.  Would you take a minute to look at it?  [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 23:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
539008 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539007 +++$+++ 539007 +++$+++ 2006-08-19 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.156056240E09 +++$+++ Nevermind... apparantly these have been speedied.   +++$+++ :Nevermind... apparantly these have been speedied.  [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 23:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

276864 +++$+++ Fighting for Justice +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276864 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.181035440E09 +++$+++ Is that the best argument you can come up with?  Who told you he was on the same notability level as George W. Bush?  No one even assessed Timmy White's notability? The article was created out of whim.  It's people like you who bring Wikpedia down.   +++$+++ Is that the best argument you can come up with?  Who told you he was on the same notability level as George W. Bush?  No one even assessed Timmy White's notability? The article was created out of whim.  It's people like you who bring Wikpedia down.  [[User:Fighting for Justice|Fighting for Justice]] 02:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
276865 +++$+++ Fighting for Justice +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276864 +++$+++ 276864 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.181050320E09 +++$+++ Yeah, well, I'm little upset about the snide way you disagreed with me.  '''\"Perhaps George W. Bush wants his privacy, too\"'''.  You know very well that White is not as notable as George W. Bush.  Bush is a public individual and he knows it.  Take some of your own advice and assume [[WP:AGF|good faith]] as well.   +++$+++ :Yeah, well, I'm little upset about the snide way you disagreed with me.  '''"Perhaps George W. Bush wants his privacy, too"'''.  You know very well that White is not as notable as George W. Bush.  Bush is a public individual and he knows it.  Take some of your own advice and assume [[WP:AGF|good faith]] as well.  [[User:Fighting for Justice|Fighting for Justice]] 06:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
276866 +++$+++ Fighting for Justice +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276864 +++$+++ 276865 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.181052720E09 +++$+++ I have no problems with people disagreeing with me.  So long as the person tells it to me in a polite fashion.  You did not.  George W. Bush has nothing to do with keeping or deleting the Timmy White article.  You simply used the statement to take a jab at me.  If you really believed in assuming good faith, you would have said \"I disagree with you\".  And left it at that.   +++$+++ ::I have no problems with people disagreeing with me.  So long as the person tells it to me in a polite fashion.  You did not.  George W. Bush has nothing to do with keeping or deleting the Timmy White article.  You simply used the statement to take a jab at me.  If you really believed in assuming good faith, you would have said "I disagree with you".  And left it at that.  [[User:Fighting for Justice|Fighting for Justice]] 07:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
276867 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276864 +++$+++ 276866 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.181053980E09 +++$+++ I can see that you believe my analogy was inappropriate or disproportionate. It was, however, merely an analogy. It is you who perceive it as \"taking a jab\" at you personally. I suggest, once again, that you re-evaluate the thought process that led you to this conclusion. Black and white communication, such as e-mail or web posting, is known to be fraught with this sort of misinterpretation. -- +++$+++ :::I can see that you believe my analogy was inappropriate or disproportionate. It was, however, merely an analogy. It is you who perceive it as "taking a jab" at you personally. I suggest, once again, that you re-evaluate the thought process that led you to this conclusion. Black and white communication, such as e-mail or web posting, is known to be fraught with this sort of misinterpretation. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 07:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

14721 +++$+++ Mariah-Yulia +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14721 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-09 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.270844940E09 +++$+++ I can't make heads or tail from Ukrainian political party's anyhow... \u2014 ''' +++$+++ I can't make heads or tail from Ukrainian political party's anyhow... — '''[[User:Mariah-Yulia|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:orange">Mariah-Yulia</span>]]'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:Mariah-Yulia|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:blue">Talk to me!</span>]] 13:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
14722 +++$+++ Mariah-Yulia +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14721 +++$+++ 14721 +++$+++ 2010-04-21 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.271887320E09 +++$+++ I think you want to know this: [[Forward, Ukraine!]] has renamed itself into [[People's Self-Defense Political Party]]. Dont know what this means for [[Yuriy Lutsenko's People's Self-Defense]] and [[Civil Movement \"People's Self-Defense\"]]. I presume they will be merged in this ''new'' party. Let me please know if you know more. \u2014 ''' +++$+++ :I think you want to know this: [[Forward, Ukraine!]] has renamed itself into [[People's Self-Defense Political Party]]. Dont know what this means for [[Yuriy Lutsenko's People's Self-Defense]] and [[Civil Movement "People's Self-Defense"]]. I presume they will be merged in this ''new'' party. Let me please know if you know more. — '''[[User:Mariah-Yulia|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:orange">Mariah-Yulia</span>]]'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:Mariah-Yulia|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:blue">Talk to me!</span>]] 15:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

14723 +++$+++ NineInchRuiner +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-15 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.271345220E09 +++$+++ Hi. Was there ever any discussion after which it was decided to change location map marker to 4x4 px? Or did you do this on your own? - +++$+++ Hi. Was there ever any discussion after which it was decided to change location map marker to 4x4 px? Or did you do this on your own? -[[User:NineInchRuiner|NineInchRuiner]] ([[User talk:NineInchRuiner|talk]]) 08:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
14724 +++$+++ NineInchRuiner +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14723 +++$+++ 14723 +++$+++ 2010-04-21 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.271918040E09 +++$+++ Hellooo -- +++$+++ :Hellooo --[[User:NineInchRuiner|NineInchRuiner]] ([[User talk:NineInchRuiner|talk]]) 23:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

276868 +++$+++ Therefore +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276868 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-06 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.181138520E09 +++$+++ Responded on my talk page. [[User talk:Therefore#Terminology]] Thanks! <small><span style=\"border: 1px solid black\"> +++$+++ Responded on my talk page. [[User talk:Therefore#Terminology]] Thanks! <small><span style="border: 1px solid black">[[User:Therefore|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:Black"> &nbsp;&#8756;&nbsp;Therefore&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Therefore|<span style="background-color:Black; color:white">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span>&nbsp;</small> 07:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
276869 +++$+++ Therefore +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276868 +++$+++ 276868 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.181176140E09 +++$+++ Response on [[User talk:Therefore#Terminology]] Thanks! <small><span style=\"border: 1px solid black\"> +++$+++ :Response on [[User talk:Therefore#Terminology]] Thanks! <small><span style="border: 1px solid black">[[User:Therefore|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:Black"> &nbsp;&#8756;&nbsp;Therefore&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Therefore|<span style="background-color:Black; color:white">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span>&nbsp;</small> 17:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

14725 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14725 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-21 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.271907300E09 +++$+++ Oh, I know all about the translit guides. Doesn't wiki endorse the BGN though? I guess my question was more a \"should we always use the national guide EXACTLY AS IT STATES if there is no common use\" for a bio? Or should we use the common variants  of given names (ie, Serhiy over Serhii) as a rule of thumb. Like, is Vyacheslav more common than Viacheslav? Should we use the most common variant of the given name, or translit according to national standard?--''' +++$+++ Oh, I know all about the translit guides. Doesn't wiki endorse the BGN though? I guess my question was more a "should we always use the national guide EXACTLY AS IT STATES if there is no common use" for a bio? Or should we use the common variants  of given names (ie, Serhiy over Serhii) as a rule of thumb. Like, is Vyacheslav more common than Viacheslav? Should we use the most common variant of the given name, or translit according to national standard?--'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 20:35, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
14726 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14725 +++$+++ 14725 +++$+++ 2010-04-21 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.271910120E09 +++$+++ Well, national rules say use double vowels to end names, so what's your take on that?--''' +++$+++ :Well, national rules say use double vowels to end names, so what's your take on that?--'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 21:22, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

14727 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-21 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.271912280E09 +++$+++ Well, according to the updated law, [http:\/\/www.upns.org\/ukrainian-transliteration link], double vowels are to be used for given names (eg. Andrii)--''' +++$+++ Well, according to the updated law, [http://www.upns.org/ukrainian-transliteration link], double vowels are to be used for given names (eg. Andrii)--'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 21:58, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
14728 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14727 +++$+++ 14727 +++$+++ 2010-04-21 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.271914740E09 +++$+++ I guess my confusion is: do we do official transliteration, which goes against wiki policy of using BGN, or do we use the most common translit, following wiki common-use guidelines.--''' +++$+++ :I guess my confusion is: do we do official transliteration, which goes against wiki policy of using BGN, or do we use the most common translit, following wiki common-use guidelines.--'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 22:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

14729 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14729 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-22 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.271982060E09 +++$+++ Does the name Ihnat exist in Ukraine? Or would Ignat be the proper translit? It doesn't seem to be very popular, would this be a case where Ge (\u0491) is used? --''' +++$+++ Does the name Ihnat exist in Ukraine? Or would Ignat be the proper translit? It doesn't seem to be very popular, would this be a case where Ge (ґ) is used? --'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 17:21, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
14730 +++$+++ Lvivske +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14729 +++$+++ 14729 +++$+++ 2010-04-22 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.271985900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the info. The reason I asked was there is an article I want to start on a person who uses such a name, but all most sources are in Russian, and I didn't want to translit as \"Ihnat\" if the name truly is Ignat. I'll use Ge, I guess in the Ukr translation. That's correct to use in such an instance, right? --''' +++$+++ :Thanks for the info. The reason I asked was there is an article I want to start on a person who uses such a name, but all most sources are in Russian, and I didn't want to translit as "Ihnat" if the name truly is Ignat. I'll use Ge, I guess in the Ukr translation. That's correct to use in such an instance, right? --'''[[User:Lvivske|Львівське]]''' <small>([[User talk:Lvivske|talk]])</small> 18:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
14731 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14729 +++$+++ 14729 +++$+++ 2010-04-26 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.272327780E09 +++$+++ It was way outdated, like two years, while stock exchange changes on daily basis. What was the purpose of the record then? Second of all I did not say a word in article about the [http:\/\/ux.com.ua\/s111 Ukrainian Stock Exchange] except provided a link as it also based in Ukraine. I was talking about PFTS Stock Exchange, my apologies. That needs to be corrected. I like the annual records that the Russian and the Ukrainian versions provide with volume of trading, but the monthly records is way overkill. Decennial records would be even better, but the index was not around that long.  +++$+++ :It was way outdated, like two years, while stock exchange changes on daily basis. What was the purpose of the record then? Second of all I did not say a word in article about the [http://ux.com.ua/s111 Ukrainian Stock Exchange] except provided a link as it also based in Ukraine. I was talking about PFTS Stock Exchange, my apologies. That needs to be corrected. I like the annual records that the Russian and the Ukrainian versions provide with volume of trading, but the monthly records is way overkill. Decennial records would be even better, but the index was not around that long. [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] ([[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev|talk]]) 17:23, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

395671 +++$+++ 2.27.125.148 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-20 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.308623760E09 +++$+++ Mission accomplished Vsmith! Thanks for your co-operation which is much appreciated. Martin [[Special:Contributions\/2.27.125.148|2.27.125.148]] ( +++$+++ Mission accomplished Vsmith! Thanks for your co-operation which is much appreciated. Martin [[Special:Contributions/2.27.125.148|2.27.125.148]] ([[User talk:2.27.125.148|talk]]) 19:36, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
395672 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395671 +++$+++ 395671 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.308627660E09 +++$+++ OK - I've fleshed 'em out a bit, added isbn, publisher, date.  +++$+++ :OK - I've fleshed 'em out a bit, added isbn, publisher, date. [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] ([[User talk:Vsmith#top|talk]]) 20:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

14733 +++$+++ Jaellee +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-29 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.272594780E09 +++$+++ If you want to change this, please start a discussion at [[WT:FOOTY]]. One reason why I would not like to list the goals a goalkeeper allowed is that this information might not be available for most of the goalies. -- +++$+++ If you want to change this, please start a discussion at [[WT:FOOTY]]. One reason why I would not like to list the goals a goalkeeper allowed is that this information might not be available for most of the goalies. --[[User:Jaellee|Jaellee]] ([[User talk:Jaellee|talk]]) 19:33, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
14734 +++$+++ Jaellee +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14733 +++$+++ 14733 +++$+++ 2010-04-30 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.272678780E09 +++$+++ Also, if you disagree with my interpretation what \"goals awarded\" means (I think it is \"goals scored\") you should maybe ask the guys there. -- +++$+++ :Also, if you disagree with my interpretation what "goals awarded" means (I think it is "goals scored") you should maybe ask the guys there. --[[User:Jaellee|Jaellee]] ([[User talk:Jaellee|talk]]) 18:53, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

539022 +++$+++ Telex +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-10 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.157949060E09 +++$+++ Hi, after seeing the article [[Greco-Armenian relations]], I thought that a [[Greco-Bulgarian relations]] article would be handy. As the former article is based on primarily one source (the Greek Foreign Ministry), which includes the same data on Bulgaria, it shouldn't be too hard. The problematic issue would be how are we supposed to cover the \"History\" of the relations? How far back should we go and in how much detail? Greek-Bulgarian interactions haven't always been sweet (e.g. the Second Balkan War, the Bulgarian occupation of parts of northern Greece during WWII). Do you think it would be worth it starting such an article? -- +++$+++ Hi, after seeing the article [[Greco-Armenian relations]], I thought that a [[Greco-Bulgarian relations]] article would be handy. As the former article is based on primarily one source (the Greek Foreign Ministry), which includes the same data on Bulgaria, it shouldn't be too hard. The problematic issue would be how are we supposed to cover the "History" of the relations? How far back should we go and in how much detail? Greek-Bulgarian interactions haven't always been sweet (e.g. the Second Balkan War, the Bulgarian occupation of parts of northern Greece during WWII). Do you think it would be worth it starting such an article? --[[User:Telex|Telex]] 21:31, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
539023 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539022 +++$+++ 539022 +++$+++ 2006-09-10 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.157953920E09 +++$+++ If I can give my completely uninvited opinion, it would be a great idea, and certainly would be a nice opinion. As for the history, I would advice to start with 1878, when both modern states had been formed. I'm not sure inserting in this article the medieval relations would be such a great idea; instead, a [[Byzantine-Bulgarian relations]] would be really nice. Just my two cents, and sorry for intruding.-- +++$+++ :If I can give my completely uninvited opinion, it would be a great idea, and certainly would be a nice opinion. As for the history, I would advice to start with 1878, when both modern states had been formed. I'm not sure inserting in this article the medieval relations would be such a great idea; instead, a [[Byzantine-Bulgarian relations]] would be really nice. Just my two cents, and sorry for intruding.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 22:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

14735 +++$+++ A.h. king +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-08 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.273357860E09 +++$+++ I notice that you are also from the [[Lviv Oblast]], I am from [[Lviv]] and it is nice to meet you [[File:Smiley.svg|25px]]. ''' +++$+++ I notice that you are also from the [[Lviv Oblast]], I am from [[Lviv]] and it is nice to meet you [[File:Smiley.svg|25px]]. '''[[User:A.h. king|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:blue">A.h. king</span>]]'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:A.h. king|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:yellow">Talk to me!</span>]] 15:31, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
14736 +++$+++ A.h. king +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14735 +++$+++ 14735 +++$+++ 2010-05-08 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.273358640E09 +++$+++ I also added a [[Wikipedia:Linking|Wikilink]] to the word \"reunification\" in the userbox of [[Romania|Romanian]]-[[Moldova|Moldovan]] [[Movement for the unification of Romania and Moldova|reunification]] on your userpage [[File:Smiley.svg|25px]]. ''' +++$+++ :I also added a [[Wikipedia:Linking|Wikilink]] to the word "reunification" in the userbox of [[Romania|Romanian]]-[[Moldova|Moldovan]] [[Movement for the unification of Romania and Moldova|reunification]] on your userpage [[File:Smiley.svg|25px]]. '''[[User:A.h. king|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:blue">A.h. king</span>]]'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:A.h. king|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:yellow">Talk to me!</span>]] 15:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

616984 +++$+++ WebDrake +++$+++ Kku +++$+++ 616984 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-07 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.128728880E09 +++$+++ Best wishes & thanks for bringing SOC to Wikipedia! &mdash;  +++$+++ Best wishes & thanks for bringing SOC to Wikipedia! &mdash; [[User:WebDrake|WebDrake]] 16:48, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
616985 +++$+++ Kku +++$+++ Kku +++$+++ 616984 +++$+++ 616984 +++$+++ 2005-11-14 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.132009320E09 +++$+++ you're welcome. cut'n paste wasn't such a great effort... the update looks interesting, unfortunately i don't have much time to spend on translations lately. i might pick out a few facts for the german page, though. thanks a lot! --  +++$+++ :you're welcome. cut'n paste wasn't such a great effort... the update looks interesting, unfortunately i don't have much time to spend on translations lately. i might pick out a few facts for the german page, though. thanks a lot! -- [[User:Kku|Kku]] 15:02, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

539026 +++$+++ Zaparojdik +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539026 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-12 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.158114120E09 +++$+++ Regarding Turkic people's architecture, you should know about climate; Central Asia's climate is continental which is very cold( -20\/-30) in winter time and very hot (~30 to ~+45) in summer but the building is made by wooden. If you build one of them in Central Asia, It won't be firm. Like you can't build Norwegian style buildings in Africa. -  +++$+++ Regarding Turkic people's architecture, you should know about climate; Central Asia's climate is continental which is very cold( -20/-30) in winter time and very hot (~30 to ~+45) in summer but the building is made by wooden. If you build one of them in Central Asia, It won't be firm. Like you can't build Norwegian style buildings in Africa. - [[User:Zaparojdik|Zaparojdik]] 19:22, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
539027 +++$+++  +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539026 +++$+++ 539026 +++$+++ 2006-09-12 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.158115140E09 +++$+++ It's really not Greek architecture, these houses belong to Turkish riches in Bulgaria and as same as in Veliko Tarnovo, See; [[Greek Revival architecture]] 19:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :It's really not Greek architecture, these houses belong to Turkish riches in Bulgaria and as same as in Veliko Tarnovo, See; [[Greek Revival architecture]] 19:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

14739 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-19 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.274318280E09 +++$+++ Apparently some [[User:Garik 11|Garik 11]] does not like this fact and keeps on deleting it. He calls it gibberish. That incident also is mentioned on the other versions of wikipedia.  +++$+++ Apparently some [[User:Garik 11|Garik 11]] does not like this fact and keeps on deleting it. He calls it gibberish. That incident also is mentioned on the other versions of wikipedia. [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] ([[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev|talk]]) 18:18, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
14740 +++$+++ LokiiT +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14739 +++$+++ 14739 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.274320080E09 +++$+++ Non-notable, non-encyclopedic. Also, Pravda isn't a reliable source.  +++$+++ :Non-notable, non-encyclopedic. Also, Pravda isn't a reliable source. [[User:LokiiT|LokiiT]] ([[User talk:LokiiT|talk]]) 18:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

276884 +++$+++ Emeraude +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-19 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.184898060E09 +++$+++ You asked: \"Does it snow anywhere in South Africa?\" Look at this pic from the [[Drakensberg]] article. In [[South Africa]] it says that \"the high Drakensberg mountains, which form the south-eastern escarpment of the Highveld, offer limited skiing opportunities in winter.\" So the answer to your question is \"Yes.\"  +++$+++ You asked: "Does it snow anywhere in South Africa?" Look at this pic from the [[Drakensberg]] article. In [[South Africa]] it says that "the high Drakensberg mountains, which form the south-eastern escarpment of the Highveld, offer limited skiing opportunities in winter." So the answer to your question is "Yes." [[User:Emeraude|Emeraude]] 19:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
276885 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276884 +++$+++ 276884 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.184903880E09 +++$+++ Heh, I should have been more sly. I was making a [[WP:SNOW]] joke, actually ... -- +++$+++ :Heh, I should have been more sly. I was making a [[WP:SNOW]] joke, actually ... --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 20:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

14741 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-19 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.274320620E09 +++$+++ You called it non-notable!? How is that not notable when it is notable? That fact stirred precedents for censorship in the country. It is mentioned outside of what you referred to as Pravda. Another question. What is in your definition of a reliable source? Google books? BBC? Why can't Ukrainian Pravda be as reliable as BBC? What are the factors that deny it to be nominated as reliable?  +++$+++ You called it non-notable!? How is that not notable when it is notable? That fact stirred precedents for censorship in the country. It is mentioned outside of what you referred to as Pravda. Another question. What is in your definition of a reliable source? Google books? BBC? Why can't Ukrainian Pravda be as reliable as BBC? What are the factors that deny it to be nominated as reliable? [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] ([[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev#top|talk]]) 18:57, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
14742 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14741 +++$+++ 14741 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.274321460E09 +++$+++ I will leave the adminhelp tag so that others can give their views, but in my opinion, though the sources may be reliable and I do not doubt that the incident happened, it is trivial and without encyclopedic notability, per [[WP:NOTNEWS]].  +++$+++ :I will leave the adminhelp tag so that others can give their views, but in my opinion, though the sources may be reliable and I do not doubt that the incident happened, it is trivial and without encyclopedic notability, per [[WP:NOTNEWS]]. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 19:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
14743 +++$+++ Sophie +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14741 +++$+++ 14742 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.274322120E09 +++$+++ Other administrators are looking into it  +++$+++ ::Other administrators are looking into it [[User:Sophie|<span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:16px;color:#CD2682;font-weight:bold;"><big>S</big>ophie</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Sophie|<span style="color:#99BADD">Talk</span>]])</sup> 19:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
14744 +++$+++ Garik 11 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14741 +++$+++ 14743 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.274322600E09 +++$+++ Aleksandr, you are mistaken saying that I do not \"like this fact\". On the contrary, I find it very entertaining. Yet the reasons it should not be there are stated above by other users and also in my past comments. Please note that the article on Yanukovych is already in terrible shape and badly needs some major clean-up and copy-editing as shown by the templates \"Inappropriate tone\" and \"POV\". The kind of edits you keep supplying will lead us deeper into unencyclopaedic territory.  +++$+++ :::Aleksandr, you are mistaken saying that I do not "like this fact". On the contrary, I find it very entertaining. Yet the reasons it should not be there are stated above by other users and also in my past comments. Please note that the article on Yanukovych is already in terrible shape and badly needs some major clean-up and copy-editing as shown by the templates "Inappropriate tone" and "POV". The kind of edits you keep supplying will lead us deeper into unencyclopaedic territory. [[User:Garik 11|Garik 11]] ([[User talk:Garik 11|talk]]) 19:30, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
14745 +++$+++ Sophie +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14741 +++$+++ 14742 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.274322120E09 +++$+++ Other administrators are looking into it  +++$+++ ::Other administrators are looking into it [[User:Sophie|<span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:16px;color:#CD2682;font-weight:bold;"><big>S</big>ophie</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Sophie|<span style="color:#99BADD">Talk</span>]])</sup> 19:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
14746 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14741 +++$+++ 14745 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.274322720E09 +++$+++ That last one is handy. Best, <small><span style=\"border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;\"> +++$+++ :::That last one is handy. Best, <small><span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background-color:darkblue; color:#FFFFFF"> &nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B; background-color:yellow; border: 0px solid; ">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 19:32, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

276886 +++$+++ Edison +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276886 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-23 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.185231240E09 +++$+++ Nice job expanding the stub. It still looks skimpy on bringing in the references which show it had a widespread and prolonged effect. I think there were newspaper editorials critical of Jim Ryan and Birkett, the prosecutors in DuPage. There is a Scott Turow book in particular which helps to show this is not the average murder case.   +++$+++ Nice job expanding the stub. It still looks skimpy on bringing in the references which show it had a widespread and prolonged effect. I think there were newspaper editorials critical of Jim Ryan and Birkett, the prosecutors in DuPage. There is a Scott Turow book in particular which helps to show this is not the average murder case.  [[User:Edison|Edison]] 15:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
276887 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276886 +++$+++ 276886 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.185236940E09 +++$+++ Thanks. One step at a time, though. I wanted to eliminate BLP issues first, though. -- +++$+++ :Thanks. One step at a time, though. I wanted to eliminate BLP issues first, though. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 17:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
276888 +++$+++ Edison +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276886 +++$+++ 276887 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.185245760E09 +++$+++ I searched Google and Proquest and added all of the Google sources I found which seem to meet [[WP:A]] and most of the Proquest cites on the talk page. There are several where I've noted that they say it is a very important case in relation to the Illinois death penalty reform (the Frisbie book near the beginning). Definitely want to be scrupulous, since one of the prosecutors already sued the Chicago Tribune for libel, and since Dugan is to be tried. This case really seems like a classic example of how what starts as a crime story expands into the questioning the nature of the justice system, effects on state politics, and forensic technology. It is notable for its 23 years of coverage on a variety of fronts rather than for a flurry of stories over a few days.  +++$+++ ::I searched Google and Proquest and added all of the Google sources I found which seem to meet [[WP:A]] and most of the Proquest cites on the talk page. There are several where I've noted that they say it is a very important case in relation to the Illinois death penalty reform (the Frisbie book near the beginning). Definitely want to be scrupulous, since one of the prosecutors already sued the Chicago Tribune for libel, and since Dugan is to be tried. This case really seems like a classic example of how what starts as a crime story expands into the questioning the nature of the justice system, effects on state politics, and forensic technology. It is notable for its 23 years of coverage on a variety of fronts rather than for a flurry of stories over a few days. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
276889 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276886 +++$+++ 276888 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.185246240E09 +++$+++ Oh yes, exactly. I lived in Chicago during a good part of the last 25 years and it was a constant other-shoe-dropping situation. I was appalled that one of the State's Attorneys involved became Attorney General ([[Jim Ryan (politician)]]) and even more so that it was with widespread endorsement and acclaim. The libel case was very specific (at least as concluded) -- the Tribune made an egregious error in reporting on what happened inside a grand jury. But as long as we attribute the legal situation should not be a problem. And influence seems to be considered national by some. -- +++$+++ :::Oh yes, exactly. I lived in Chicago during a good part of the last 25 years and it was a constant other-shoe-dropping situation. I was appalled that one of the State's Attorneys involved became Attorney General ([[Jim Ryan (politician)]]) and even more so that it was with widespread endorsement and acclaim. The libel case was very specific (at least as concluded) -- the Tribune made an egregious error in reporting on what happened inside a grand jury. But as long as we attribute the legal situation should not be a problem. And influence seems to be considered national by some. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 20:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

489317 +++$+++ IvoShandor +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489317 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-17 06:16:00 +++$+++ 1.208438160E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray; height:5em;\"| I know it says this little Wiki award is for great logic and eloquence in arguments or something, but I thought you could use it to beat me about the head for 5 or 8 minutes. Just wanted to say I am sorry for the way I acted toward you months ago. It was stupid, jerkish and a lazy way to deal with stress. I am glad you are still around and alive. Oh yeah, I decided to come back a little. :)  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray; height:5em;"| I know it says this little Wiki award is for great logic and eloquence in arguments or something, but I thought you could use it to beat me about the head for 5 or 8 minutes. Just wanted to say I am sorry for the way I acted toward you months ago. It was stupid, jerkish and a lazy way to deal with stress. I am glad you are still around and alive. Oh yeah, I decided to come back a little. :) [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 06:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
489318 +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489317 +++$+++ 489317 +++$+++ 2008-04-18 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.208516040E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I don't think I'm going to be batting you, though.  I'm just glad to see you're back.  -- +++$+++ : Thanks.  I don't think I'm going to be batting you, though.  I'm just glad to see you're back.  --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 03:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

276890 +++$+++ Mms +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-24 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.185288360E09 +++$+++ Dear Dan Hartung, I'm trying to tidy up some free software related topics and categories at the moment. An individual who is a kernel hacker is therefore a free software programmer and therefore a computer programmer. I think he should only be listed on the deepest category which fits. Categories which involve the location or other aspects (like \xbbcomputer programmers in Australia\xab) are not affected by this consideration (as long as there are no categories like \xbbcomputer programmers in Queensland\xab). -- +++$+++ Dear Dan Hartung, I'm trying to tidy up some free software related topics and categories at the moment. An individual who is a kernel hacker is therefore a free software programmer and therefore a computer programmer. I think he should only be listed on the deepest category which fits. Categories which involve the location or other aspects (like »computer programmers in Australia«) are not affected by this consideration (as long as there are no categories like »computer programmers in Queensland«). --[[User:Mms|mms]] 07:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
276891 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276890 +++$+++ 276890 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.185288600E09 +++$+++ OK, I'm glad you explained your rationale. Looking at your recent history I was concerned there was removal of categories before prodding which could be interpreted as a way to avoid oversight. I didn't disagree with all your AFDs, you'll note, but I think it's clear that several were overreaching, regardless of article quality. -- +++$+++ :OK, I'm glad you explained your rationale. Looking at your recent history I was concerned there was removal of categories before prodding which could be interpreted as a way to avoid oversight. I didn't disagree with all your AFDs, you'll note, but I think it's clear that several were overreaching, regardless of article quality. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 07:50, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
276892 +++$+++ Mms +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276890 +++$+++ 276891 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.185290700E09 +++$+++ Yes, most were overreaching. I was reading all those poor bio-stubs for hours and thought Wikipedia should not have article of this standard. But as explained in the discussion at the AfDs the article itself can be valueable if the subject is notaceable even if its content should be completely rewritten. I came to Wikipedia in 2005 (as a registered user) but I am a novice in those administrative regards. -- +++$+++ ::Yes, most were overreaching. I was reading all those poor bio-stubs for hours and thought Wikipedia should not have article of this standard. But as explained in the discussion at the AfDs the article itself can be valueable if the subject is notaceable even if its content should be completely rewritten. I came to Wikipedia in 2005 (as a registered user) but I am a novice in those administrative regards. --[[User:Mms|mms]] 08:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

14747 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-19 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.274323800E09 +++$+++ That is funny that [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia]] is included rather than [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ukraine]].  +++$+++ That is funny that [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia]] is included rather than [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ukraine]]. [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] ([[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev#top|talk]]) 19:50, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
14748 +++$+++ Mariah-Yulia +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14747 +++$+++ 14747 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.274334540E09 +++$+++ [[User:LokiiT|LokiiT]] should give his reasons to call [[Ukrayinska Pravda]] \"not a reliable source\". Cause for me they are! No they are not Yanukovych or Medvedev friendly, but there also not Tymoshenko or Yuchenko friendly. Ukrayinska Pravda is defiantly a reliable source in my book. Besides it's incredible rude to carelessly call the website \"not a reliable source\" since the owner was killed for the content on it. Please show some respect for this great man, [[Georgiy Gongadze]], and his wife and children before writing this sort of, for me, insulting edits. Come up with better arguments then insulting sources. And at least state why Ukrayinska Pravda is suppose to be unreliable. \u2014 ''' +++$+++ :[[User:LokiiT|LokiiT]] should give his reasons to call [[Ukrayinska Pravda]] "not a reliable source". Cause for me they are! No they are not Yanukovych or Medvedev friendly, but there also not Tymoshenko or Yuchenko friendly. Ukrayinska Pravda is defiantly a reliable source in my book. Besides it's incredible rude to carelessly call the website "not a reliable source" since the owner was killed for the content on it. Please show some respect for this great man, [[Georgiy Gongadze]], and his wife and children before writing this sort of, for me, insulting edits. Come up with better arguments then insulting sources. And at least state why Ukrayinska Pravda is suppose to be unreliable. — '''[[User:Mariah-Yulia|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:orange">Mariah-Yulia</span>]]'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:Mariah-Yulia|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:blue">Talk to me!</span>]] 22:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

539036 +++$+++ Ghirlandajo +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539036 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-15 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.158351000E09 +++$+++ Could you check the page? The author requires some assistance. --<font color=\"FC4339\"> +++$+++ Could you check the page? The author requires some assistance. --<font color="FC4339">[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</font></sup> 13:10, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
539037 +++$+++ BACbKA +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539036 +++$+++ 539036 +++$+++ 2006-09-15 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.158372360E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I've changed the first name of Cpt. Burago to Aleksandr. -- +++$+++ : Thanks, I've changed the first name of Cpt. Burago to Aleksandr. --[[User:BACbKA|BACbKA]] 19:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

14749 +++$+++ LokiiT +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-19 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.274335440E09 +++$+++ I had mistaken Ukrayinska Pravda for the less-than-credible tabloid pravda.ru. Sorry for the confusion.  +++$+++ I had mistaken Ukrayinska Pravda for the less-than-credible tabloid pravda.ru. Sorry for the confusion. [[User:LokiiT|LokiiT]] ([[User talk:LokiiT|talk]]) 23:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
14750 +++$+++ Mariah-Yulia +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14749 +++$+++ 14749 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.274335800E09 +++$+++ Glad we cleared this up. Mistakes can happen. No hard feelings! \u2014 ''' +++$+++ :Glad we cleared this up. Mistakes can happen. No hard feelings! — '''[[User:Mariah-Yulia|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:orange">Mariah-Yulia</span>]]'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:Mariah-Yulia|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:blue">Talk to me!</span>]] 23:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

14751 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-19 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.274337480E09 +++$+++ I hope that clarifies.<small><span style=\"border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;\"> +++$+++ I hope that clarifies.<small><span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background-color:darkblue; color:#FFFFFF"> &nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B; background-color:yellow; border: 0px solid; ">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 23:38, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
14752 +++$+++ Mariah-Yulia +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14751 +++$+++ 14751 +++$+++ 2010-05-21 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.274460360E09 +++$+++ All is forgiven [[File:Angel-smiley.svg|25px]]. I just wanted to make sure Chzz would never forget Ukraine [[File:Att-admire.svg|30px]]. \u2014 ''' +++$+++ :All is forgiven [[File:Angel-smiley.svg|25px]]. I just wanted to make sure Chzz would never forget Ukraine [[File:Att-admire.svg|30px]]. — '''[[User:Mariah-Yulia|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:orange">Mariah-Yulia</span>]]'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:Mariah-Yulia|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:blue">Talk to me!</span>]] 09:46, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

539040 +++$+++ Ralbot +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-19 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.158668700E09 +++$+++ <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost\/Tools\/Spamlist|''Signpost'' spamlist]].  If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.   +++$+++ <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist|''Signpost'' spamlist]].  If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.  [[User:Ralbot|Ralbot]] 05:25, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
539041 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539040 +++$+++ 539040 +++$+++ 2006-09-25 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.159209120E09 +++$+++ Done. But I haven't deleted the redirect [[Boris Mikhailov (footballer)]], as the other editor modified all the links, connecting them to [[Boris Mikhailov (footballer)]], while not even one is linked to [[Borislav Mikhailov]].-- +++$+++ :Done. But I haven't deleted the redirect [[Boris Mikhailov (footballer)]], as the other editor modified all the links, connecting them to [[Boris Mikhailov (footballer)]], while not even one is linked to [[Borislav Mikhailov]].--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 11:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

14754 +++$+++ Ezhiki +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Hi, Aleksandr!  Wondering if you would be able to help me.  I was working on parsing [http:\/\/constitution.garant.ru\/DOC_12920.htm this document] trying to add the lists of the original cities to the governorate articles.  I was more or less able to map them to modern localities for [[Moscow Governorate|Moscow]] and [[Saint Petersburg Governorate]]s, and am fairly confident I'll be able to map most of the rest of them, but I got stuck on Kiev Governorate.  I don't have much info on Ukraine, so matching the original cities with what is now often minor villages in Ukraine is a challenge.  Is this something you can help with?  Would you be interested to?  Cheers,\u2014 +++$+++ Hi, Aleksandr!  Wondering if you would be able to help me.  I was working on parsing [http://constitution.garant.ru/DOC_12920.htm this document] trying to add the lists of the original cities to the governorate articles.  I was more or less able to map them to modern localities for [[Moscow Governorate|Moscow]] and [[Saint Petersburg Governorate]]s, and am fairly confident I'll be able to map most of the rest of them, but I got stuck on Kiev Governorate.  I don't have much info on Ukraine, so matching the original cities with what is now often minor villages in Ukraine is a challenge.  Is this something you can help with?  Would you be interested to?  Cheers,—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); June&nbsp;2, 2010; 13:24 (UTC)
14755 +++$+++ Ezhiki +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14754 +++$+++ 14754 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ \"Prigorodki\" were side-towns administered by [[posadnik]]s from the larger cities; basically suburbs of those cities, although sometimes the distances were quite big.  Pskov, for example, was considered to be the ''prigorodok'' of Veliky Novgorod until mid-14th century.\u2014 +++$+++ :"Prigorodki" were side-towns administered by [[posadnik]]s from the larger cities; basically suburbs of those cities, although sometimes the distances were quite big.  Pskov, for example, was considered to be the ''prigorodok'' of Veliky Novgorod until mid-14th century.—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); June&nbsp;2, 2010; 13:41 (UTC)

539044 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-26 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.159321200E09 +++$+++ Hmm... I really don't know a lot about Haiduk Veljko. I know that it is claimed that eastern Serbia (and thus Timocka Krajina) is claimed to have been populated by ethnic Bulgarians right up until a while ago. Anyway, it is generally known that since the old Medieval ages Bulgarians or at least Slavs under Bulgarian influence\/rule more than half of present-day Serbia. I don't think that the Bulgarian claim lies in just ''that''. I promise I'll look into the issue - but if you've found some reliable sources, I encourage you to put it into the article as a possibility. After all, the article on Milos (K)Obilic mentions his supposed both Bulgarian and Albanian ethnic origin. :) What does the Bulgarian encyclopedia say 'bout him? Or the Macedonian? P. S. He wasn't a \"Grand\" Duke (I think). -- +++$+++ Hmm... I really don't know a lot about Haiduk Veljko. I know that it is claimed that eastern Serbia (and thus Timocka Krajina) is claimed to have been populated by ethnic Bulgarians right up until a while ago. Anyway, it is generally known that since the old Medieval ages Bulgarians or at least Slavs under Bulgarian influence/rule more than half of present-day Serbia. I don't think that the Bulgarian claim lies in just ''that''. I promise I'll look into the issue - but if you've found some reliable sources, I encourage you to put it into the article as a possibility. After all, the article on Milos (K)Obilic mentions his supposed both Bulgarian and Albanian ethnic origin. :) What does the Bulgarian encyclopedia say 'bout him? Or the Macedonian? P. S. He wasn't a "Grand" Duke (I think). --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 18:40, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
539045 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539044 +++$+++ 539044 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.159328160E09 +++$+++ The claim on Milos Obilic is mainly based on national foklkore - all Balkan nations claim him because of his alleged success (AFAIC - he's not even Serbian, but '''Montenegrin''' - whoops! are Montenegrins really Serbs?!?!? :))) This Balchannalia can't stop hurting my brains!!!). Historically, Serbs lived on the Rashka region (modern-day Sandzak), Metohija, parts of Kosovo and Macedonia, Zeta (Montenegro). The majority was actually in Herzegovina and Bosnia. There was no (or little) Serb population in the early medieval ages north of the Danube, or even Western Morava - and most definately no in the Southern Morava (up until the Nemanjics). This is something claimed by Serbian historians (good ones) and I think is also claimed by others (Bulgarian historians?) - thus, there is ''no reason'' to dispute it. -- +++$+++ :The claim on Milos Obilic is mainly based on national foklkore - all Balkan nations claim him because of his alleged success (AFAIC - he's not even Serbian, but '''Montenegrin''' - whoops! are Montenegrins really Serbs?!?!? :))) This Balchannalia can't stop hurting my brains!!!). Historically, Serbs lived on the Rashka region (modern-day Sandzak), Metohija, parts of Kosovo and Macedonia, Zeta (Montenegro). The majority was actually in Herzegovina and Bosnia. There was no (or little) Serb population in the early medieval ages north of the Danube, or even Western Morava - and most definately no in the Southern Morava (up until the Nemanjics). This is something claimed by Serbian historians (good ones) and I think is also claimed by others (Bulgarian historians?) - thus, there is ''no reason'' to dispute it. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 20:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
539046 +++$+++ HolyRomanEmperor +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539044 +++$+++ 539045 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.159397580E09 +++$+++ Well, what if the people ''doesn't know'' what it wants? :) More and more Montenegrins opt for the Montenegrin language and Montenegrin Orthodox Church - rather than the Serbian; and more and more Montenegrins opt Serbian nationality, rather. Montenegro's situation is confusing; altogether because of its current regime. -- +++$+++ :: Well, what if the people ''doesn't know'' what it wants? :) More and more Montenegrins opt for the Montenegrin language and Montenegrin Orthodox Church - rather than the Serbian; and more and more Montenegrins opt Serbian nationality, rather. Montenegro's situation is confusing; altogether because of its current regime. --[[User:HolyRomanEmperor|HolyRomanEmperor]] 15:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

276901 +++$+++ Bardsandwarriors +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276901 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-05 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.186339260E09 +++$+++ I would appreciate elaboration on your reasons for adding this tag; and whether you would remove the tag if the extra information suggested here is added to it.  +++$+++ I would appreciate elaboration on your reasons for adding this tag; and whether you would remove the tag if the extra information suggested here is added to it. [[User:Bardsandwarriors|Bards]] 11:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
276902 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276901 +++$+++ 276901 +++$+++ 2007-08-05 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.186339740E09 +++$+++ Those are all sort of vague and none of them has sources. Notability isn't just being a nice old building (I'd love to do articles on all the nice old buildings in my city), it's being e.g. \"one of the best surviving examples of its style in Wales\" (hypothetical quote). Is it a listed building? Is it a named landmark? If the festival it holds is notable, we should have an article; if it isn't, holding the festival isn't a real claim to notability. These are all nice things, but they don't really satisfy [[WP:N]]. A quick Google shows that there are sources for a better article, I suggest you bring some of them in as citations (and read [[WP:N|our notability guidelines]]). -- +++$+++ :Those are all sort of vague and none of them has sources. Notability isn't just being a nice old building (I'd love to do articles on all the nice old buildings in my city), it's being e.g. "one of the best surviving examples of its style in Wales" (hypothetical quote). Is it a listed building? Is it a named landmark? If the festival it holds is notable, we should have an article; if it isn't, holding the festival isn't a real claim to notability. These are all nice things, but they don't really satisfy [[WP:N]]. A quick Google shows that there are sources for a better article, I suggest you bring some of them in as citations (and read [[WP:N|our notability guidelines]]). --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 11:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
276903 +++$+++ Bardsandwarriors +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276901 +++$+++ 276902 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.186443300E09 +++$+++ A lot of wikipedians are doing just that: writing articles on all the nice old buildings in their town, eg. see [[:Category:Buildings_and_structures_in_Cardiff]]. If you have a problem with our nice little theatre, you'd better stick tags on 10s of 1000s of others. I think you are interpreting WP:N way too harshly. However, if I have time I will try to find a few references, and pin down the facts better.  +++$+++ ::A lot of wikipedians are doing just that: writing articles on all the nice old buildings in their town, eg. see [[:Category:Buildings_and_structures_in_Cardiff]]. If you have a problem with our nice little theatre, you'd better stick tags on 10s of 1000s of others. I think you are interpreting WP:N way too harshly. However, if I have time I will try to find a few references, and pin down the facts better. [[User:Bardsandwarriors|Bards]] 16:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
276904 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276901 +++$+++ 276903 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.186523040E09 +++$+++ \"Sticking a tag\" is not a punishment. I did not nominate your article for deletion. I put the tag on it because without any references it violates our core policy of [[WP:V|verifiability]] and [[WP:RS|reliable sourcing]]. No article without sources or verification belongs on Wikipedia, and claims of notability should be attributed. -- +++$+++ :::"Sticking a tag" is not a punishment. I did not nominate your article for deletion. I put the tag on it because without any references it violates our core policy of [[WP:V|verifiability]] and [[WP:RS|reliable sourcing]]. No article without sources or verification belongs on Wikipedia, and claims of notability should be attributed. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 14:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

539047 +++$+++ Cameltrader +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539047 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-30 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.159637640E09 +++$+++ Concerning \"[[Largo, Sofia]]\", I think ''largo'' simply used to mean \"a square\" (\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0449\u0430\u0434), there's nothing distinctive about exactly this place being a largo. -- +++$+++ Concerning "[[Largo, Sofia]]", I think ''largo'' simply used to mean "a square" (площад), there's nothing distinctive about exactly this place being a largo. --[[User:Cameltrader|Cameltrader]] 10:34, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
539048 +++$+++ Cameltrader +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539047 +++$+++ 539047 +++$+++ 2006-09-30 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.159640040E09 +++$+++ NP, just letting you know in case you didn't, because in the article it looked to me like a proper name (and apparently it has already become such). :) I don't mean to change anything. I'm not aware about other largos in Sofia &mdash; I know there are places they call largo in Varna and Rousse (...no \"regional patriotism\" intended), and maybe many other cities with a ''broad'' central square. -- +++$+++ :NP, just letting you know in case you didn't, because in the article it looked to me like a proper name (and apparently it has already become such). :) I don't mean to change anything. I'm not aware about other largos in Sofia &mdash; I know there are places they call largo in Varna and Rousse (...no "regional patriotism" intended), and maybe many other cities with a ''broad'' central square. --[[User:Cameltrader|Cameltrader]] 11:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

14761 +++$+++ Brudder Andrusha +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-18 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.276897860E09 +++$+++ The future proposed playoffs for the team finishing 16th in the Persha liha and second in Druha Liha is a proposal for the 2010-11 season. Your entry has been deleted from that article. What does it have to do with the just completed 2009-10 Persha Liha season??? Explain! I also question your rational of placing European competition results within the Ukrainian Premier League season. Those games are played in different competitions  - NOT the Premier League. Again explain why you think those games need to be displayed in the season competiton of the Premier League. If anything those results need to be placed in an article \"Football in Ukraine 2009-10\".  +++$+++ The future proposed playoffs for the team finishing 16th in the Persha liha and second in Druha Liha is a proposal for the 2010-11 season. Your entry has been deleted from that article. What does it have to do with the just completed 2009-10 Persha Liha season??? Explain! I also question your rational of placing European competition results within the Ukrainian Premier League season. Those games are played in different competitions  - NOT the Premier League. Again explain why you think those games need to be displayed in the season competiton of the Premier League. If anything those results need to be placed in an article "Football in Ukraine 2009-10". [[User:Brudder Andrusha|Brudder Andrusha]] ([[User talk:Brudder Andrusha|talk]]) 14:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
14762 +++$+++ Brudder Andrusha +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14761 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-19 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.276993260E09 +++$+++ Just because the decision was brought up during the season it has NO impact on the competition for the 2009-10 season which is what the article is about. If a decision is going to be made, which probably will be June 24, that is - AFTER the completion of the 2009-10 season and impact will be on the next season 2010-11. So that is where information about changes to methods of classification goes. Hence, your inclusion was baseless because it has no bearing on the 2009-10 competition.  +++$+++ :: Just because the decision was brought up during the season it has NO impact on the competition for the 2009-10 season which is what the article is about. If a decision is going to be made, which probably will be June 24, that is - AFTER the completion of the 2009-10 season and impact will be on the next season 2010-11. So that is where information about changes to methods of classification goes. Hence, your inclusion was baseless because it has no bearing on the 2009-10 competition. [[User:Brudder Andrusha|Brudder Andrusha]] ([[User talk:Brudder Andrusha|talk]]) 17:21, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

14763 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-19 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.276984200E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] ([[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev|talk]]) 14:50, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
14764 +++$+++ Brudder Andrusha +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14763 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-19 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.276993260E09 +++$+++ Again I disagree with your reason of including results of competitions which have their own separate articles and the clubs information is clearly described. You seem to lose focus that the article deals with \"200x-201x Ukrainian '''Premier League'''\" NOT including other competition as well. All other information is inconsequential to that competition which is what the article is about. Information about teams firing coaches during the season because of results in other competition should be in articles related to the '''team's season article''' such as what [[User:Ceriy]] created and kept up to date for [[2009\u201310 FC Kremin Kremenchuk season]] or something like [[2009\u201310 in English football]] or even [[2009\u201310 in Ukrainian football]]. But even then the latter articles don't consider European competition games as part of their calendar. I am going to bring this up with Season's task force and get clarification on whether that information is valid to be included in a nation's top competition. I seriously doubt that is valid and you should be prepared to save those edits or include them in more appropriately titled articles because they could be deleted.  +++$+++ :: Again I disagree with your reason of including results of competitions which have their own separate articles and the clubs information is clearly described. You seem to lose focus that the article deals with "200x-201x Ukrainian '''Premier League'''" NOT including other competition as well. All other information is inconsequential to that competition which is what the article is about. Information about teams firing coaches during the season because of results in other competition should be in articles related to the '''team's season article''' such as what [[User:Ceriy]] created and kept up to date for [[2009–10 FC Kremin Kremenchuk season]] or something like [[2009–10 in English football]] or even [[2009–10 in Ukrainian football]]. But even then the latter articles don't consider European competition games as part of their calendar. I am going to bring this up with Season's task force and get clarification on whether that information is valid to be included in a nation's top competition. I seriously doubt that is valid and you should be prepared to save those edits or include them in more appropriately titled articles because they could be deleted. [[User:Brudder Andrusha|Brudder Andrusha]] ([[User talk:Brudder Andrusha|talk]]) 17:21, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

14765 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14765 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-20 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.277096520E09 +++$+++ thanks  +++$+++ thanks [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 22:02, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
14766 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14765 +++$+++ 14765 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.277097600E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 22:20, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
14767 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14765 +++$+++ 14766 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.277098140E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 22:29, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

532963 +++$+++ Darth armitage +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532963 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-23 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.195885800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Darth armitage|Darth armitage]] ([[User talk:Darth armitage|talk]]) 22:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
532964 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532963 +++$+++ 532963 +++$+++ 2007-11-23 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.195885860E09 +++$+++ Ok. I will recreate it for now, add the content and then we can discuss. --''' +++$+++ : Ok. I will recreate it for now, add the content and then we can discuss. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
532965 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532963 +++$+++ 532963 +++$+++ 2007-11-23 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.195885800E09 +++$+++ Hi. Four different admins deleted this article today, asserting it was an advertisment for the company (my decision wa not influenced by the previous ones). The thing is that far too many companies on the WP actually don't deserve their article and would get deleted if contested. The problem is notability criteria. We can still run a deletion review but I doubt it would succeed.... Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Four different admins deleted this article today, asserting it was an advertisment for the company (my decision wa not influenced by the previous ones). The thing is that far too many companies on the WP actually don't deserve their article and would get deleted if contested. The problem is notability criteria. We can still run a deletion review but I doubt it would succeed.... Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
532966 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532963 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-23 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.195886460E09 +++$+++ Ok, I'll take some time and have a look but it will be tomorrow since it's already late here. Hope it's ok. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ ::: Ok, I'll take some time and have a look but it will be tomorrow since it's already late here. Hope it's ok. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

14768 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14768 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-30 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.277886420E09 +++$+++ Do you have any time to spend on some of them ?  +++$+++ Do you have any time to spend on some of them ? [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 01:27, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
14769 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14768 +++$+++ 14768 +++$+++ 2010-06-30 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.277941920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 16:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
14770 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14768 +++$+++ 14769 +++$+++ 2010-06-30 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.277943420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 17:17, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
14771 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14768 +++$+++ 14768 +++$+++ 2010-06-30 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.277944140E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 17:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

539057 +++$+++ Vbb-sk-mk +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-14 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.160882220E09 +++$+++ As for '''Funkyfly's behavior''', its anything but serious and neutral, all of the discussions are public and everyone can see that. Im offten  trying to avoid making changes to the  articles  unilateraly, I always try to discuss everything beforehand on the discussion pages, I always explain the nature of the changes in the \"edit summary field\" ,  but for no avail. what i receive in response is cynicism etc. (academic citation: ''Blah-Blah-Blah'' author: Funkyfly, link: [[User_talk:Aldux#Need_your_opinion.2C_Problem_-_article:_Kiro_Gligorov|Aldux user talk]]). Im not against a healthy dose of irony but this went too far. BTW his\/her \"solid statements\" regarding [[Kiro Gligorov]] consist of certain document scans issued by the authorities of the nazi puppet state [[Kingdom of Bulgaria]] in 1942 (quite \"democratic\" times) and they are published on a website of a nationalist political party VMRO-BND. Kiro Gligorov allegedly signed those documents and only two years after, in 1944, he is suddenly  at [[ASNOM]] fighting that same Kingdom of Bulgaria? Very \"NPOV\" and \"academic\". Bravo. As for my \"nationalism\",  compared to what you guys are doing  here- its below anything extreme.-- +++$+++ As for '''Funkyfly's behavior''', its anything but serious and neutral, all of the discussions are public and everyone can see that. Im offten  trying to avoid making changes to the  articles  unilateraly, I always try to discuss everything beforehand on the discussion pages, I always explain the nature of the changes in the "edit summary field" ,  but for no avail. what i receive in response is cynicism etc. (academic citation: ''Blah-Blah-Blah'' author: Funkyfly, link: [[User_talk:Aldux#Need_your_opinion.2C_Problem_-_article:_Kiro_Gligorov|Aldux user talk]]). Im not against a healthy dose of irony but this went too far. BTW his/her "solid statements" regarding [[Kiro Gligorov]] consist of certain document scans issued by the authorities of the nazi puppet state [[Kingdom of Bulgaria]] in 1942 (quite "democratic" times) and they are published on a website of a nationalist political party VMRO-BND. Kiro Gligorov allegedly signed those documents and only two years after, in 1944, he is suddenly  at [[ASNOM]] fighting that same Kingdom of Bulgaria? Very "NPOV" and "academic". Bravo. As for my "nationalism",  compared to what you guys are doing  here- its below anything extreme.--[[User:Vbb-sk-mk|Vbb-sk-mk]] 20:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
539058 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539057 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.160897460E09 +++$+++ Just want to add that Vbb-sk-mk, totally in spirit of many fellow [[Republic of Macedonia|Republicans]], considers mentions of bulgarian nationality an \"abuse\". Double standards? Hypocricy? Paranoia? :)  +++$+++ ::Just want to add that Vbb-sk-mk, totally in spirit of many fellow [[Republic of Macedonia|Republicans]], considers mentions of bulgarian nationality an "abuse". Double standards? Hypocricy? Paranoia? :) [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk_</b>&nbsp;</span>]] 00:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
539059 +++$+++ FunkyFly +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539057 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.161861120E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&diff=prev&oldid=82934182 Anything] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Quadell&diff=prev&oldid=82934153 but] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Krste_Misirkov&diff=prev&oldid=82934124 extreme]. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Kiro_Gligorov&diff=prev&oldid=82934100 How] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ilinden-Preobrazhenie_Uprising&diff=prev&oldid=82934069 insightful].  +++$+++ :::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&diff=prev&oldid=82934182 Anything] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Quadell&diff=prev&oldid=82934153 but] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krste_Misirkov&diff=prev&oldid=82934124 extreme]. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kiro_Gligorov&diff=prev&oldid=82934100 How] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ilinden-Preobrazhenie_Uprising&diff=prev&oldid=82934069 insightful]. [[User talk:FunkyFly|<span style="color:#0F0;background:#000;"><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;/FunkyFly.talk_</b>&nbsp;</span>]] 04:12, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
539060 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539057 +++$+++ 539057 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.161083700E09 +++$+++ The title may be flawed. On the one hand, the article is about a little more than just the camps. On the other hand, we probably can't yet call it \"repression in Communist Bulgaria\", as it hardly covers all the means of repression (secret police, censorship, etc.). Also, \"the Bulgarian Gulag\" might have POV issues. Let's try to sort this out, since I eventually plan similar articles for PL, HU, CZ, DDR, RO, AL, and YU.  +++$+++ *The title may be flawed. On the one hand, the article is about a little more than just the camps. On the other hand, we probably can't yet call it "repression in Communist Bulgaria", as it hardly covers all the means of repression (secret police, censorship, etc.). Also, "the Bulgarian Gulag" might have POV issues. Let's try to sort this out, since I eventually plan similar articles for PL, HU, CZ, DDR, RO, AL, and YU. [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] 04:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
539061 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539057 +++$+++ 539057 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.161162660E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your suggestions, Todor. I did merge the Deportation section and do some re-arranging. Also, that list of Belene inmates on bg.wiki looks quite intriguing. I won't ask you to translate all six articles on persons in that list, but the one on Muraviev would be good to have, because I added mention of him, and he is an important figure. Anyway, take your time.  +++$+++ :Thank you for your suggestions, Todor. I did merge the Deportation section and do some re-arranging. Also, that list of Belene inmates on bg.wiki looks quite intriguing. I won't ask you to translate all six articles on persons in that list, but the one on Muraviev would be good to have, because I added mention of him, and he is an important figure. Anyway, take your time. [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] 02:11, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

276914 +++$+++ Steve Dufour +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-29 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.188381060E09 +++$+++ I am going to nominate this article, which you started, for deletion since the subject is not notable. Sorry.  +++$+++ I am going to nominate this article, which you started, for deletion since the subject is not notable. Sorry. [[User:Steve Dufour|Steve Dufour]] 02:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
276915 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276914 +++$+++ 276914 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.188436920E09 +++$+++ !sknahT .em ot snaem siht hcum woh aedi evah uoY !ratsnraB tsrif ym yllautca si siht ,sreay eerht tsomla aidepikiW gnitide neeb evah I hguoht nevE -- +++$+++ :!sknahT .em ot snaem siht hcum woh aedi evah uoY !ratsnraB tsrif ym yllautca si siht ,sreay eerht tsomla aidepikiW gnitide neeb evah I hguoht nevE --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 18:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

14776 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14776 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-11 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.281579060E09 +++$+++ Hello. I wanted to let you know that with a little expansion and a few more inline citations, [[Ratusha, Ivano-Frankivsk]] could qualify for Wikipedia's front page under [[WP:Did you know]]. \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ Hello. I wanted to let you know that with a little expansion and a few more inline citations, [[Ratusha, Ivano-Frankivsk]] could qualify for Wikipedia's front page under [[WP:Did you know]]. —&nbsp;[[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 19:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
14777 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14776 +++$+++ 14776 +++$+++ 2010-08-11 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.281586980E09 +++$+++ I'd like to help, but I don't know anything about Ukraine. You might want to try asking for help at [[WT:UKRAINE]]. \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ :I'd like to help, but I don't know anything about Ukraine. You might want to try asking for help at [[WT:UKRAINE]]. —&nbsp;[[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 21:23, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

276921 +++$+++ Bullzeye +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-08 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.189248300E09 +++$+++ Did you ever get ahold of NASA to try and find a better quality version of that image? <span style=\"font-family:impact, serif;background:black;color:red;border-style:single;letter-spacing:1px\">Bullzeye<\/span><small><sup><i> +++$+++ Did you ever get ahold of NASA to try and find a better quality version of that image? <span style="font-family:impact, serif;background:black;color:red;border-style:single;letter-spacing:1px">Bullzeye</span><small><sup><i>[[User talk:Bullzeye|  (Ring for Service)]]</i></sup></small> 03:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
276922 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276921 +++$+++ 276921 +++$+++ 2007-09-08 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.189248600E09 +++$+++ I contacted them through their public affairs office, but they have not yet replied. I will probably have to try [[social engineering]] to find out who may be a good direct contact. I love that shot; I'll keep trying! -- +++$+++ :I contacted them through their public affairs office, but they have not yet replied. I will probably have to try [[social engineering]] to find out who may be a good direct contact. I love that shot; I'll keep trying! --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 03:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
276923 +++$+++ Bullzeye +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276921 +++$+++ 276921 +++$+++ 2007-09-08 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.189300920E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot. I liked that shot, too, and if we can find a version of it that addresses the quality issues, I see no reason why it couldn't make FP. The \"We don't need American patriotic images\" crowd is another story; I feel that's a spurious, ethnocentric and illegitimate version of [[WP:IDONTLIKEIT]] and would happy press the matter to a RfC if necessary. <span style=\"font-family:impact, serif;background:black;color:red;border-style:single;letter-spacing:1px\">Bullzeye<\/span><small><sup><i> +++$+++ :Thanks a lot. I liked that shot, too, and if we can find a version of it that addresses the quality issues, I see no reason why it couldn't make FP. The "We don't need American patriotic images" crowd is another story; I feel that's a spurious, ethnocentric and illegitimate version of [[WP:IDONTLIKEIT]] and would happy press the matter to a RfC if necessary. <span style="font-family:impact, serif;background:black;color:red;border-style:single;letter-spacing:1px">Bullzeye</span><small><sup><i>[[User talk:Bullzeye|  (Ring for Service)]]</i></sup></small> 18:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

526751 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-18 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.179473220E09 +++$+++ Ever hear of that concept?  +++$+++ Ever hear of that concept? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:27, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
526752 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526751 +++$+++ 526751 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.179475200E09 +++$+++ That's right.  The person received, be he a Colonel or naval Captain, the promotion upon retirement and said person was permitted to have the inscription of B. General or R. Admiral on his tombstone, but the person did not recieve the pay that corresponded said grade. The practice was discontinued by an Act of Congress in 1959.  So far, I know that Rear Admiral [[Jose M. Cabanillas]] was a \"Tombstone Admiral\". I'm going to try to find out which of the admirals which I wrote about were Tombstone Admiral's.  +++$+++ *That's right.  The person received, be he a Colonel or naval Captain, the promotion upon retirement and said person was permitted to have the inscription of B. General or R. Admiral on his tombstone, but the person did not recieve the pay that corresponded said grade. The practice was discontinued by an Act of Congress in 1959.  So far, I know that Rear Admiral [[Jose M. Cabanillas]] was a "Tombstone Admiral". I'm going to try to find out which of the admirals which I wrote about were Tombstone Admiral's. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 01:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

14780 +++$+++ Everard Proudfoot +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14780 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-27 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.282971780E09 +++$+++ What's wrong with the unsourced section tag?   +++$+++ What's wrong with the unsourced section tag?  [[User:Everard Proudfoot|Everard Proudfoot]] ([[User talk:Everard Proudfoot|talk]]) 22:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
14781 +++$+++ Everard Proudfoot +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14780 +++$+++ 14780 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.282972080E09 +++$+++ There are no sources in the '''''section''''', which is why the ''unsourced '''section''''' tag was used.   +++$+++ :There are no sources in the '''''section''''', which is why the ''unsourced '''section''''' tag was used.  [[User:Everard Proudfoot|Everard Proudfoot]] ([[User talk:Everard Proudfoot|talk]]) 22:08, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

14782 +++$+++ MissAmericaGirl +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14782 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-07 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.283923260E09 +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of [[Special:Contributions\/Aleksandr Grigoryev|your recent edits]], such as the one you made to [[:Anna Poslavska]], did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee\/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->  +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of [[Special:Contributions/Aleksandr Grigoryev|your recent edits]], such as the one you made to [[:Anna Poslavska]], did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> [[User:MissAmericaGirl|MissAmericaGirl]] ([[User talk:MissAmericaGirl|talk]]) 22:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
14783 +++$+++ MissAmericaGirl +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14782 +++$+++ 14782 +++$+++ 2010-09-08 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.283942400E09 +++$+++ I apologize for accidently and wrongfully accusing you of vandalism. I was not familiar with that wording (Spectator's sympathy) and I guess I jumped to conclusion. I'm just used to people vandalizing these pages and I should have asked you about it first. After I sent you the message, I looked at some links and noticed that she had won something similar to a People's Choice so I changed it to that. I will change back your edits and I do apologize. I just had never heard that term before.  +++$+++ :I apologize for accidently and wrongfully accusing you of vandalism. I was not familiar with that wording (Spectator's sympathy) and I guess I jumped to conclusion. I'm just used to people vandalizing these pages and I should have asked you about it first. After I sent you the message, I looked at some links and noticed that she had won something similar to a People's Choice so I changed it to that. I will change back your edits and I do apologize. I just had never heard that term before. [[User:MissAmericaGirl|MissAmericaGirl]] ([[User talk:MissAmericaGirl|talk]]) 03:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
14784 +++$+++ MissAmericaGirl +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14782 +++$+++ 14783 +++$+++ 2010-09-08 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.283943000E09 +++$+++ Also, thank you so much for sending me all those links! Could you explain to me what a Spectator's sympathy is? I'm just curious! Sorry again for that. I apologize and am very sorry about that!!  +++$+++ ::Also, thank you so much for sending me all those links! Could you explain to me what a Spectator's sympathy is? I'm just curious! Sorry again for that. I apologize and am very sorry about that!! [[User:MissAmericaGirl|MissAmericaGirl]] ([[User talk:MissAmericaGirl|talk]]) 03:50, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
14785 +++$+++ MissAmericaGirl +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14782 +++$+++ 14784 +++$+++ 2010-09-08 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.284004980E09 +++$+++ I found an article, that was one of the sources on the [[Miss Ukraine]] page, which stated that she had won People's Choice. It is at http:\/\/en.prichernomorie.com.ua\/odesa\/articles\/Society\/Sep%2006%202010\/85.php -It was one of the few links in English that I was able to read. That is what I meant when I changed it. Sorry for the confusion! It might not have an exact translation, sometimes things sound a little confusing when they are translated from a different language. Sorry again!  +++$+++ :::I found an article, that was one of the sources on the [[Miss Ukraine]] page, which stated that she had won People's Choice. It is at http://en.prichernomorie.com.ua/odesa/articles/Society/Sep%2006%202010/85.php -It was one of the few links in English that I was able to read. That is what I meant when I changed it. Sorry for the confusion! It might not have an exact translation, sometimes things sound a little confusing when they are translated from a different language. Sorry again! [[User:MissAmericaGirl|MissAmericaGirl]] ([[User talk:MissAmericaGirl|talk]]) 21:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
14786 +++$+++ MissAmericaGirl +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14782 +++$+++ 14785 +++$+++ 2010-09-09 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.284022080E09 +++$+++ Hi! I checked and that article was #3 on the [[Miss Ukraine]] page, hopefully that will help you find it! And also, I remember you said her name ([[Anna Poslavska]]) could be spelled (translated) differently into Poslavskaya. If you are interested, the alternate spelling can be added as an alias in the pageant titleholder box (see [[Ximena Navarrete]]).  +++$+++ ::::Hi! I checked and that article was #3 on the [[Miss Ukraine]] page, hopefully that will help you find it! And also, I remember you said her name ([[Anna Poslavska]]) could be spelled (translated) differently into Poslavskaya. If you are interested, the alternate spelling can be added as an alias in the pageant titleholder box (see [[Ximena Navarrete]]). [[User:MissAmericaGirl|MissAmericaGirl]] ([[User talk:MissAmericaGirl|talk]]) 01:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
14787 +++$+++ MissAmericaGirl +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14782 +++$+++ 14786 +++$+++ 2010-09-10 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.284102060E09 +++$+++ Oh ok. Well feel free to change it in the article. You explain it better than me. My great-grandparents are actually Ukrainian and there is some question about the translated spelling of their last names as well. I guess it is very hard to translate it exactly because of the different alphabet. Thanks for clearing it up!  +++$+++ :::::Oh ok. Well feel free to change it in the article. You explain it better than me. My great-grandparents are actually Ukrainian and there is some question about the translated spelling of their last names as well. I guess it is very hard to translate it exactly because of the different alphabet. Thanks for clearing it up! [[User:MissAmericaGirl|MissAmericaGirl]] ([[User talk:MissAmericaGirl|talk]]) 00:01, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

276927 +++$+++ Marquinho +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276927 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.189770600E09 +++$+++ Thanks again Dhartung for your comment on the Yuniti article deletion, I really appreciate it. I was getting very frustrated with the other editors' wishy-washy reasons, none of which were listed on any of the wikipedia policies (alexa page rankings? that was a shocker).  I really do appreciate your straight to the point reasoning, and more concise explanation of the generic wikipedia policies.  Your reasoning was clear and to the point, and neutralized my frustration. Thanks, and take care. - +++$+++ Thanks again Dhartung for your comment on the Yuniti article deletion, I really appreciate it. I was getting very frustrated with the other editors' wishy-washy reasons, none of which were listed on any of the wikipedia policies (alexa page rankings? that was a shocker).  I really do appreciate your straight to the point reasoning, and more concise explanation of the generic wikipedia policies.  Your reasoning was clear and to the point, and neutralized my frustration. Thanks, and take care. -[[User:Marquinho|Marquinho]] 04:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
276928 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276927 +++$+++ 276927 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.189770720E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome, Marquinho, and thank you for trying to understand our policies and guidelines better. -- +++$+++ :You're very welcome, Marquinho, and thank you for trying to understand our policies and guidelines better. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 04:52, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

276929 +++$+++ Duja +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.189793340E09 +++$+++ Out of curiosity, how come that you have never (AFAICT) run for adminship? Glancing over your interests, ton of contribs, Kate's tool etc you seem like a perfect candidate. Granted, I don't know you well, apart from remembering your username from around. Checking your talk archives, I see only the tariqabjotu's (unanswered?) proposal from about a year ago.  +++$+++ Out of curiosity, how come that you have never (AFAICT) run for adminship? Glancing over your interests, ton of contribs, Kate's tool etc you seem like a perfect candidate. Granted, I don't know you well, apart from remembering your username from around. Checking your talk archives, I see only the tariqabjotu's (unanswered?) proposal from about a year ago. [[User:Duja|Duja]]<span style="font-size:70%;">[[User talk:Duja|►]]</span> 11:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
276930 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276929 +++$+++ 276929 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.189818360E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! It was no problem at all. As for the second part, you've got me -- I've never run, though I've been asked (more than once) to date. Call it partly an aversion to politics, and partly I'm insisting I want to get around to changing my username to something less obviously \"me\" before I run, but I've been too busy to go through the actual process. -- +++$+++ :You're welcome! It was no problem at all. As for the second part, you've got me -- I've never run, though I've been asked (more than once) to date. Call it partly an aversion to politics, and partly I'm insisting I want to get around to changing my username to something less obviously "me" before I run, but I've been too busy to go through the actual process. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 18:06, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

594067 +++$+++ DASHBot +++$+++ Hamster Sandwich +++$+++ 594067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-15 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.263561780E09 +++$+++ Thanks!-- +++$+++ Thanks!--[[User:DASHBot|DASHBot]] ([[User talk:DASHBot|talk]]) 05:23, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
594068 +++$+++ Exit2DOS2000 +++$+++ Hamster Sandwich +++$+++ 594067 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.265826060E09 +++$+++ The editing of a closed AFD discussion is frowned upon. You may get a better discussion of the proposed changes if you post it to the [[Talk:SEIU_Local_1_Canada|Articles Talk Page]]. <font style=\"background-color:Thistle;font-weight:bold;color:Black;\">Exit2DOS <\/font><small><sup> \u2022  +++$+++ :*The editing of a closed AFD discussion is frowned upon. You may get a better discussion of the proposed changes if you post it to the [[Talk:SEIU_Local_1_Canada|Articles Talk Page]]. <font style="background-color:Thistle;font-weight:bold;color:Black;">Exit2DOS </font><small><sup> • [[User:Exit2DOS2000|Ctrl]] • [[User Talk:Exit2DOS2000|Alt]] • [[Special:Contributions/Exit2DOS2000|Del]]</sup></small> 10:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

539078 +++$+++ Evlekis +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539078 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-08 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.163011800E09 +++$+++ Well I did notice the upper and lower case \u201c\u041f\" but I thought that was just a typing error, I didn't realise the significance. Do you think it's a better idea to write - (\u041f\u043b\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043d\u0430 - sometimes using a lowercase 'p' as it only means \"mountain\")?  +++$+++ Well I did notice the upper and lower case “П" but I thought that was just a typing error, I didn't realise the significance. Do you think it's a better idea to write - (Планина - sometimes using a lowercase 'p' as it only means "mountain")? [[User:Evlekis|Evlekis]] 10:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
539079 +++$+++ Evlekis +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539078 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-08 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.163027460E09 +++$+++ Yes but isn't Bulgarian just a case of \"\u0420\u0430\u0441\u0438\u043f\u0430\u043d\u043e \u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438?\", or was Macedonian \"\u0420\u0430\u0437\u0432\u044a\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043e \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u0438\"? I can never remember which. Only joking! I see what you mean now. Well you could just use the Bulgarian name, I doubt many Macedonians will take exception. After all, we agreed not to use the Macedonian name for Kyustendil some time back and nobody worried about that. I'll leave it to you.  +++$+++ ::Yes but isn't Bulgarian just a case of "Расипано Македонски?", or was Macedonian "Развълено Български"? I can never remember which. Only joking! I see what you mean now. Well you could just use the Bulgarian name, I doubt many Macedonians will take exception. After all, we agreed not to use the Macedonian name for Kyustendil some time back and nobody worried about that. I'll leave it to you. [[User:Evlekis|Evlekis]] 15:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

276939 +++$+++ Coren +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276939 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.191830820E09 +++$+++ Nope; not an eggcorn.  That would require the misreading to make ''more'' apparent sense than the original; it's a semantic rereading.  :-)  I read Language Log too, you know!  &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ Nope; not an eggcorn.  That would require the misreading to make ''more'' apparent sense than the original; it's a semantic rereading.  :-)  I read Language Log too, you know!  &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 01:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
276940 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276939 +++$+++ 276939 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.191831060E09 +++$+++ Darn, maybe we just go with [[malapropism]] and call it a day. -- +++$+++ :Darn, maybe we just go with [[malapropism]] and call it a day. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 01:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
276941 +++$+++ Coren +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276939 +++$+++ 276940 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.191832200E09 +++$+++ Well, I don't know if the effect was humorous...  but I'm all out of similar concepts to throw around off the top of my head, so we'll go with malapropism.  :-)  &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Well, I don't know if the effect was humorous...  but I'm all out of similar concepts to throw around off the top of my head, so we'll go with malapropism.  :-)  &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 01:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

526754 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-19 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.179559560E09 +++$+++ Do mean the story about the Army's song album with the Marine in its cover? Men, what a blooper!  Right now I'm recharging my mental batterires. I'm planning to counterattack PBS's and Ken Burns documentary \"The War\", which will air in September and which has totally omitted the Hispanic contribution to the WW II effort.  I hope to write a really good article in the future to this respect and try to have it FA'ed so that maybe it can be posted on September.  I'm in no rush though, I'm in my planning stages.  +++$+++ Do mean the story about the Army's song album with the Marine in its cover? Men, what a blooper!  Right now I'm recharging my mental batterires. I'm planning to counterattack PBS's and Ken Burns documentary "The War", which will air in September and which has totally omitted the Hispanic contribution to the WW II effort.  I hope to write a really good article in the future to this respect and try to have it FA'ed so that maybe it can be posted on September.  I'm in no rush though, I'm in my planning stages. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
526755 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526754 +++$+++ 526754 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.179569760E09 +++$+++ At first PBS and Ken Burns did not want to relent.  They stated that Burns documentary was a \"Masterpiece\" and would not be changed.  After they felt the preasure, they (PBS & company) stated that they would not change the documentary, but would make certain inserts during commercials as to the Hispanic contributions. Not acceptable!  Finally, the Latino community pressed and threaten the sponsors with a boycott of their products. PBS stated that they will make some changes, but Burns does not want to make any changes to his original work. I will try to do some justice to these people with an article.  +++$+++ *At first PBS and Ken Burns did not want to relent.  They stated that Burns documentary was a "Masterpiece" and would not be changed.  After they felt the preasure, they (PBS & company) stated that they would not change the documentary, but would make certain inserts during commercials as to the Hispanic contributions. Not acceptable!  Finally, the Latino community pressed and threaten the sponsors with a boycott of their products. PBS stated that they will make some changes, but Burns does not want to make any changes to his original work. I will try to do some justice to these people with an article. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 03:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

46157 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-01 07:17:00 +++$+++ 1.304259420E09 +++$+++ Some of the higher dimensional polytopes are being discussed at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Polytope articles]]. You might like to participate.-- +++$+++ Some of the higher dimensional polytopes are being discussed at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Polytope articles]]. You might like to participate.--[[User:Salix alba|Salix]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]): 07:17, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
46158 +++$+++ Tamfang +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46157 +++$+++ 46157 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.304301480E09 +++$+++ Tom, your post there has some obvious bloopers (like \"an published\" for \"an unpublished\"). Are you gonna clean them up? Shall I? \u2014 +++$+++ : Tom, your post there has some obvious bloopers (like "an published" for "an unpublished"). Are you gonna clean them up? Shall I? —[[User:Tamfang|Tamfang]] ([[User talk:Tamfang|talk]]) 18:58, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
46159 +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46157 +++$+++ 46157 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.304301720E09 +++$+++ Fixed one. I'm going offline, if you see any others. :)  +++$+++ : Fixed one. I'm going offline, if you see any others. :) [[User:Tomruen|Tom Ruen]] ([[User talk:Tomruen#top|talk]]) 19:02, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
46160 +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46157 +++$+++ 46157 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.305784020E09 +++$+++ Sorry, don't have the time to help now. Referencing old copies is a legitimate way to source wikipedia links on the web, guaranteeing the content referenced will be there. There's a \"toolbox\" option on the right \"Permanent link\" that creates this current URL, and you can get old ones from the history as I showed. Your online references should link to the old copy. On the removal itself, the claim was the algorithm was unreferenced, so it could be restored with references, or moved to a separate article? You could copy it to a test user page like [[User:Skinnerd\/Simplex_Point_Picking]] and edit there for practice. Good luck!  +++$+++ : Sorry, don't have the time to help now. Referencing old copies is a legitimate way to source wikipedia links on the web, guaranteeing the content referenced will be there. There's a "toolbox" option on the right "Permanent link" that creates this current URL, and you can get old ones from the history as I showed. Your online references should link to the old copy. On the removal itself, the claim was the algorithm was unreferenced, so it could be restored with references, or moved to a separate article? You could copy it to a test user page like [[User:Skinnerd/Simplex_Point_Picking]] and edit there for practice. Good luck! [[User:Tomruen|Tom Ruen]] ([[User talk:Tomruen#top|talk]]) 22:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
46161 +++$+++ Toshio Yamaguchi +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46157 +++$+++ 46157 +++$+++ 2011-05-25 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.306312440E09 +++$+++ I see you have already commented at the AfD. I place the notification on your talk page anyway, in order to follow the procedure.  +++$+++ :I see you have already commented at the AfD. I place the notification on your talk page anyway, in order to follow the procedure. [[User:Toshio Yamaguchi|Toshio Yamaguchi]] ([[User talk:Toshio Yamaguchi|talk]]) 01:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

14800 +++$+++ 41.132.178.176 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14800 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-14 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.292386680E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/41.132.178.176|41.132.178.176]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/41.132.178.176|41.132.178.176]] ([[User talk:41.132.178.176|talk]]) 20:18, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
14801 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14800 +++$+++ 14800 +++$+++ 2010-12-14 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.292392440E09 +++$+++ Yes, you are right and I absolutely agree with you. There are some studies that have taken place, however, I did not find any solid references to provide for that topic thus far. The references that are currently at that article is also somewhat under question. In reality no one really certain how the cultures of the Great Eurasian Steppe has evolved. There are only some theories. Look at the history of Kievan Rus. It seems that Slavic historians avoid to be associated with [[Pechenegs]] or [[Cumans]], but the fact is that the legacy of the Pecheneg tribe geographically echoes throughout the territories of Ukraine, Hungary, Slovakia. While at some point in history when there was a current of idea in Poland that Poles are of a Sarmatian cast. In my opinion, the Sarmatian people has split between Slavic, Turkic, and, maybe, Judaic cultures over time. The good example was the defense of Crimea by Polovtsy from the [[Baty]] invasion in XIII century and the arise of the [[Crimean Khanate]] couple of centuries later. How to explain the existence of such people as [[Alans]] and [[Circassians]] in the North Caucasus? What about [[Georgians]]? The [[Kipchak Khanate]] certainly consisted of numerous tribes and not necessarily of Turkic race. Yet, that is my opinion on the topic which is neither denied at the Cumans' article or proven.  +++$+++ :Yes, you are right and I absolutely agree with you. There are some studies that have taken place, however, I did not find any solid references to provide for that topic thus far. The references that are currently at that article is also somewhat under question. In reality no one really certain how the cultures of the Great Eurasian Steppe has evolved. There are only some theories. Look at the history of Kievan Rus. It seems that Slavic historians avoid to be associated with [[Pechenegs]] or [[Cumans]], but the fact is that the legacy of the Pecheneg tribe geographically echoes throughout the territories of Ukraine, Hungary, Slovakia. While at some point in history when there was a current of idea in Poland that Poles are of a Sarmatian cast. In my opinion, the Sarmatian people has split between Slavic, Turkic, and, maybe, Judaic cultures over time. The good example was the defense of Crimea by Polovtsy from the [[Baty]] invasion in XIII century and the arise of the [[Crimean Khanate]] couple of centuries later. How to explain the existence of such people as [[Alans]] and [[Circassians]] in the North Caucasus? What about [[Georgians]]? The [[Kipchak Khanate]] certainly consisted of numerous tribes and not necessarily of Turkic race. Yet, that is my opinion on the topic which is neither denied at the Cumans' article or proven. [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] ([[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev#top|talk]]) 21:54, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

539092 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-19 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.164007020E09 +++$+++ What say you?  +++$+++ What say you? [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] 23:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
539093 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539092 +++$+++ 539092 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.164065220E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I've reverted the latest change.  +++$+++ : Thanks. I've reverted the latest change. [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] 15:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

276949 +++$+++ Miller17CU94 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-18 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.192736580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help on saving the [[Thomas M. Jacobs]] article from deletion. I really appreciate it.  +++$+++ Thanks for your help on saving the [[Thomas M. Jacobs]] article from deletion. I really appreciate it. [[User:Miller17CU94|Chris]] 12:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
276950 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276949 +++$+++ 276949 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.192747020E09 +++$+++ No problem. Olympians are considered notable per [[WP:BIO]] so it should not even have been nominated. -- +++$+++ :No problem. Olympians are considered notable per [[WP:BIO]] so it should not even have been nominated. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 15:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

14806 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14806 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-22 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.293006660E09 +++$+++ It is not correct to tag full-length articles (>1500 bytes of prose) as stubs. Categories sort articles better than templates.  +++$+++ It is not correct to tag full-length articles (>1500 bytes of prose) as stubs. Categories sort articles better than templates. [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 00:31, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
14807 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14806 +++$+++ 14806 +++$+++ 2010-12-22 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.293007020E09 +++$+++ Because stub template sort of aims to say \"this article is very short, it is missing basic information and it is a first priority for expansion\". It is the categories which should define the subject, not the stub templates.  +++$+++ :Because stub template sort of aims to say "this article is very short, it is missing basic information and it is a first priority for expansion". It is the categories which should define the subject, not the stub templates. [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 00:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
14808 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14806 +++$+++ 14807 +++$+++ 2010-12-22 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.293007440E09 +++$+++ 1500 bytes of prose text is accepted by the [[WP:DYK]] project as a low length limit for a stub. Surely, this length is not well defined (some code tricks can make the length different for a given content), but it gives some sort of definition. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::1500 bytes of prose text is accepted by the [[WP:DYK]] project as a low length limit for a stub. Surely, this length is not well defined (some code tricks can make the length different for a given content), but it gives some sort of definition. Cheers. [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 00:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

14811 +++$+++ Deryck Chan +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-31 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.296521580E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I saw that in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ukrainian_Premier_League&action=historysubmit&diff=409529140&oldid=409017535 this edit] you removed an entire section and said the information is available somewhere else. Where is it? I think the history section should mention the league of the soviet times a bit, and provide a link to the article that currently has that table of winners. -- +++$+++ Hi there. I saw that in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian_Premier_League&action=historysubmit&diff=409529140&oldid=409017535 this edit] you removed an entire section and said the information is available somewhere else. Where is it? I think the history section should mention the league of the soviet times a bit, and provide a link to the article that currently has that table of winners. --[[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 16:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
14812 +++$+++ Deryck Chan +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14811 +++$+++ 14811 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.296691260E09 +++$+++ That's fine. Thanks for explaining. -- +++$+++ *That's fine. Thanks for explaining. --[[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 16:01, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
14813 +++$+++ Deryck Chan +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14811 +++$+++ 14812 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.296694200E09 +++$+++ Yea that's good. Thanks for your work on those articles. I'm just worried that you may fall into the trap of [[Wikipedia:Original research|Original research]] if you don't try to source every paragraph of what you write - especially given the comments you voiced in the talk page of the article about how you think the league should've operated. -- +++$+++ **Yea that's good. Thanks for your work on those articles. I'm just worried that you may fall into the trap of [[Wikipedia:Original research|Original research]] if you don't try to source every paragraph of what you write - especially given the comments you voiced in the talk page of the article about how you think the league should've operated. --[[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 16:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
14814 +++$+++ Deryck Chan +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14811 +++$+++ 14813 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.296695820E09 +++$+++ It would be a good idea nevertheless to use inline citations to link from each paragraph to the source where the information have come from, and also citations from the tables to the sources where the statistics were compiled from. -- +++$+++ ***It would be a good idea nevertheless to use inline citations to link from each paragraph to the source where the information have come from, and also citations from the tables to the sources where the statistics were compiled from. --[[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 17:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

276957 +++$+++ JzG +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276957 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-03 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.194143760E09 +++$+++ Ah, a pertinent point well put.  Perhaps you would be so good as to help me document the \"his own research\" bit, since I think we can probably do without that kind of thing on a more permanent basis, if you get my drift. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]<\/b> <small>( +++$+++ Ah, a pertinent point well put.  Perhaps you would be so good as to help me document the "his own research" bit, since I think we can probably do without that kind of thing on a more permanent basis, if you get my drift. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 19:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
276958 +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276957 +++$+++ 276957 +++$+++ 2007-11-03 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.194144540E09 +++$+++ Yes, definitely, since he uses it even in the articles that are automatic keeps, it's quite troubling. COI, self-promotion, unverifiability ... I believe he argued strenuously about this on ANI, I'll try to find it. -- +++$+++ :Yes, definitely, since he uses it even in the articles that are automatic keeps, it's quite troubling. COI, self-promotion, unverifiability ... I believe he argued strenuously about this on ANI, I'll try to find it. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 19:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

395685 +++$+++ Thgiled +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-02 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.309637280E09 +++$+++ Can you comment here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Dimitri_(painter)] please?-- +++$+++ Can you comment here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dimitri_(painter)] please?--[[User:Thgiled|Thgiled]] ([[User talk:Thgiled|talk]]) 13:08, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
395686 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ 395685 +++$+++ 395685 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309637880E09 +++$+++ Please read the links I left on your talk page, gather some [[WP:RS|reliable references]] to establish [[WP:Notability]] and try again. Also avoid the appearance of promotion or advertising (or the real thing) in your writing.  +++$+++ :Please read the links I left on your talk page, gather some [[WP:RS|reliable references]] to establish [[WP:Notability]] and try again. Also avoid the appearance of promotion or advertising (or the real thing) in your writing. [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] ([[User talk:Vsmith#top|talk]]) 13:18, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

14816 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14816 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-04 10:12:00 +++$+++ 1.296843120E09 +++$+++ Article is posted for a speedy deletion on grounds of notability.  +++$+++ Article is posted for a speedy deletion on grounds of notability. [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] ([[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev|talk]]) 10:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
14817 +++$+++ Noel baran +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14816 +++$+++ 14816 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.296845760E09 +++$+++ Thank you about info, but what I can do? Some times I angry about all these \"deleters\":(, because than ordinary wikipedians must recreated deleted articles, that become \"notable\". For example, it happened with article [[Dmytro Nepohodov]].-- +++$+++ * Thank you about info, but what I can do? Some times I angry about all these "deleters":(, because than ordinary wikipedians must recreated deleted articles, that become "notable". For example, it happened with article [[Dmytro Nepohodov]].--[[User:Noel baran|Noel baran]] ([[User talk:Noel baran|talk]]) 10:56, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

539105 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-08 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.165611060E09 +++$+++ Dude, what are you doing... don't redirect the page, you're not saving it from vandalism, actually, what you're doing is as bad as vandalism. Just use the revert function to undo malicious edits, redirecting doesn't help, actually, it only prevents the article from displaying and is not a measure against vandalism. Thanks. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ Dude, what are you doing... don't redirect the page, you're not saving it from vandalism, actually, what you're doing is as bad as vandalism. Just use the revert function to undo malicious edits, redirecting doesn't help, actually, it only prevents the article from displaying and is not a measure against vandalism. Thanks. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 12:51, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
539106 +++$+++ Catchpole +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539105 +++$+++ 539105 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.165611180E09 +++$+++ If I can click on the link from the main page without displaying a picture of a penis to pop up, I am reverting vandalism. I wasn't about to spend 10 minutes hunting through to fins which template had been vandalised. So the revert function won't work if a template has been changed.  +++$+++ :If I can click on the link from the main page without displaying a picture of a penis to pop up, I am reverting vandalism. I wasn't about to spend 10 minutes hunting through to fins which template had been vandalised. So the revert function won't work if a template has been changed. [[User:Catchpole|Catchpole]] 12:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

483067 +++$+++ CJCurrie +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-09 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.186651020E09 +++$+++ I realize that indefinitely blocking this idiot's IP addresses doesn't resolve the underlying problem of the situation ... but it does seem to slow him down a bit.  I'm not certain of the particulars of his situation, apart from the fact that he's targeted me repeatedly over a period of several months.   +++$+++ I realize that indefinitely blocking this idiot's IP addresses doesn't resolve the underlying problem of the situation ... but it does seem to slow him down a bit.  I'm not certain of the particulars of his situation, apart from the fact that he's targeted me repeatedly over a period of several months.  [[User:CJCurrie|CJCurrie]] 02:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
483068 +++$+++ CJCurrie +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483067 +++$+++ 483067 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.186654020E09 +++$+++ I'm fairly certain that these IPs aren't generally accessible, though I'd be willing to undo the indefinite blocks if I've made a mistake.  I suppose shorter blocks would have the same effect, now that you mention it.   +++$+++ *I'm fairly certain that these IPs aren't generally accessible, though I'd be willing to undo the indefinite blocks if I've made a mistake.  I suppose shorter blocks would have the same effect, now that you mention it.  [[User:CJCurrie|CJCurrie]] 03:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

14822 +++$+++ Brudder Andrusha +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-05 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.299375780E09 +++$+++ You better save all that hard work that you did because it will disappear.  +++$+++ You better save all that hard work that you did because it will disappear. [[User:Brudder Andrusha|Brudder Andrusha]] ([[User talk:Brudder Andrusha|talk]]) 17:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
14823 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14822 +++$+++ 14822 +++$+++ 2011-03-05 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.299379860E09 +++$+++ How is it that the awards have nothing to do with the league if most of the players do play in the league and it's their performance that contributed to the awards? I do agree that it could be separated and it should be into a different article [[wikt:per se|per se]]. There you are right.  +++$+++ :How is it that the awards have nothing to do with the league if most of the players do play in the league and it's their performance that contributed to the awards? I do agree that it could be separated and it should be into a different article [[wikt:per se|per se]]. There you are right. [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] ([[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev|talk]]) 18:51, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
14824 +++$+++ Brudder Andrusha +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14822 +++$+++ 14823 +++$+++ 2011-03-05 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.299380640E09 +++$+++ Just because some of the players play in the league does not suffice that information be present in the entry. All the selection of the team is from a group of readers from a website and NOT the official Premier League website. The individual players can have some information in their own pages that they got the award - but it is NOT a PREMIER League Award.  +++$+++ :: Just because some of the players play in the league does not suffice that information be present in the entry. All the selection of the team is from a group of readers from a website and NOT the official Premier League website. The individual players can have some information in their own pages that they got the award - but it is NOT a PREMIER League Award. [[User:Brudder Andrusha|Brudder Andrusha]] ([[User talk:Brudder Andrusha|talk]]) 19:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

14825 +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-05 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.299387660E09 +++$+++ In my opinion that would be more constructive way to approach the solution. What do you think?  +++$+++ In my opinion that would be more constructive way to approach the solution. What do you think? [[User:Aleksandr Grigoryev|Aleksandr Grigoryev]] ([[User talk:Aleksandr Grigoryev|talk]]) 21:01, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
14826 +++$+++ Brudder Andrusha +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14825 +++$+++ 14825 +++$+++ 2011-03-05 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.299398340E09 +++$+++ I reckon that things not directly involved with [[2010\u201311 Ukrainian Premier League]] should be removed immediately. You can go to the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football\/Season article task force]] and see if they agree with you. But I hardly think this award information is pertinent at all.  +++$+++ : I reckon that things not directly involved with [[2010–11 Ukrainian Premier League]] should be removed immediately. You can go to the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Season article task force]] and see if they agree with you. But I hardly think this award information is pertinent at all. [[User:Brudder Andrusha|Brudder Andrusha]] ([[User talk:Brudder Andrusha|talk]]) 23:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

276971 +++$+++ Axem Titanium +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-29 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.196404020E09 +++$+++ I noticed you made a comment at the above AFD. I was wondering if you wanted to qualify your \"keep\" with regards to individual articles. Are all 5 individually notable or do some of them not qualify? I noticed you said some of the brothers may possibly be deleted. Thanks,  +++$+++ I noticed you made a comment at the above AFD. I was wondering if you wanted to qualify your "keep" with regards to individual articles. Are all 5 individually notable or do some of them not qualify? I noticed you said some of the brothers may possibly be deleted. Thanks, [[User:Axem Titanium|Axem Titanium]] ([[User talk:Axem Titanium|talk]]) 22:27, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
276972 +++$+++ Axem Titanium +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276971 +++$+++ 276971 +++$+++ 2007-11-29 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.196406060E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Axem Titanium|Axem Titanium]] ([[User talk:Axem Titanium|talk]]) 23:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

539117 +++$+++ Bggoldie +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.167736860E09 +++$+++ \u041c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u044f, \u0447\u0435 [[Lake Varna]] \u0435 \u043d\u0435\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u043e - \u0435\u0437\u0435\u0440\u043e\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u0441\u0435 \u043a\u0430\u0437\u0432\u0430 \u0412\u0430\u0440\u043d\u0430. \u0417\u0430 \u043c\u0435\u043d \u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0435\u043c\u043b\u0438\u0432\u043e \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0435 \"Varna lake\", \u0437\u0430\u0449\u043e\u0442\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0431\u0430 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043e \u0432\u0435\u0447\u0435 \u0449\u0435 \u0438\u0437\u043f\u044a\u043b\u043d\u044f\u0432\u0430 \u0440\u043e\u043b\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043b\u0430\u0433\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u043d\u043e. \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438,  +++$+++ Мисля, че [[Lake Varna]] е неточно - езерото не се казва Варна. За мен е приемливо да стане "Varna lake", защото при такава подредба името вече ще изпълнява ролята на прилагателно. Поздрави, [[User:Bggoldie|Goldie]] [[User talk:Bggoldie|(tell me)]] 03:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
539118 +++$+++ Bggoldie +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539117 +++$+++ 539117 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.167848340E09 +++$+++ \u041e\u0442\u0433\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0445 \u0442\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u043c\u0435\u043d, \u0437\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u043d\u0435 \u0441\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0437\u043a\u044a\u0441\u0432\u0430 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0433\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0430. \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438,  +++$+++ : Отговорих ти при мен, за да не се доразкъсва разговора. Поздрави, [[User:Bggoldie|Goldie]] [[User talk:Bggoldie|(tell me)]] 10:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

14832 +++$+++ Zloyvolsheb +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-06 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.302143040E09 +++$+++ I am not against including the origins of the members if you think this is relevant, but I think the cause of death is one of the noteworthy things about the first Council (and really doesn't take up much space in the article). It would likely be better to point it out in a more specific article, but there is none. Actually, there are links elsewhere to that table to demonstrate the repression of the original Bolshevik commissars [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Joseph_Stalin&action=historysubmit&diff=421690396&oldid=421668110], so it is just a lot easier to link to that subsection of the article from other articles than use multiple sources to make the point. (I would imagine that the members were generally not appointed to their CPC positions on the basis of their origin, but they likely were killed off during Stalinism precisely because of those positions.)  +++$+++ I am not against including the origins of the members if you think this is relevant, but I think the cause of death is one of the noteworthy things about the first Council (and really doesn't take up much space in the article). It would likely be better to point it out in a more specific article, but there is none. Actually, there are links elsewhere to that table to demonstrate the repression of the original Bolshevik commissars [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Stalin&action=historysubmit&diff=421690396&oldid=421668110], so it is just a lot easier to link to that subsection of the article from other articles than use multiple sources to make the point. (I would imagine that the members were generally not appointed to their CPC positions on the basis of their origin, but they likely were killed off during Stalinism precisely because of those positions.) [[User:Zloyvolsheb|Zloyvolsheb]] ([[User talk:Zloyvolsheb|talk]]) 19:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
14833 +++$+++ Zloyvolsheb +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14832 +++$+++ 14832 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.302233220E09 +++$+++ Yeah, there is a lot of very poor coverage of subjects beyond the realm of the English-speaking world, and there many problems with Eastern Europe topics in particular. The history of the Russia between the February revolution and the Stalin period hasn't been very good either. From what I gather, although the czar abdicated after the February revolt, there was apparently no formal proclamation of the Russian republic until September during Provisional Government rule. Good job on the [[Russian republic]] article.  +++$+++ :Yeah, there is a lot of very poor coverage of subjects beyond the realm of the English-speaking world, and there many problems with Eastern Europe topics in particular. The history of the Russia between the February revolution and the Stalin period hasn't been very good either. From what I gather, although the czar abdicated after the February revolt, there was apparently no formal proclamation of the Russian republic until September during Provisional Government rule. Good job on the [[Russian republic]] article. [[User:Zloyvolsheb|Zloyvolsheb]] ([[User talk:Zloyvolsheb|talk]]) 20:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

276978 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276978 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-24 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.198541220E09 +++$+++ This is a trial of the AfD notification bot. If you found this message helpful, annoying or have anything else to say about it please leave a message at [[User_talk:BJBot]], thanks! -- +++$+++ This is a trial of the AfD notification bot. If you found this message helpful, annoying or have anything else to say about it please leave a message at [[User_talk:BJBot]], thanks! --[[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 16:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
276979 +++$+++ DiogenesNY +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276978 +++$+++ 276978 +++$+++ 2007-12-25 06:23:00 +++$+++ 1.198592580E09 +++$+++ As you may have noted, [[User:TenPoundHammer|TenPoundHammer]] is trying to delete the Janesville Mall article.  Unfortunately, I don't have a list of all the back issues of the Janesville Gazette I used for the original article, and I'm hundreds of miles from Janesville now.  Have you any articles I could use to mollify this fellow?  +++$+++ * As you may have noted, [[User:TenPoundHammer|TenPoundHammer]] is trying to delete the Janesville Mall article.  Unfortunately, I don't have a list of all the back issues of the Janesville Gazette I used for the original article, and I'm hundreds of miles from Janesville now.  Have you any articles I could use to mollify this fellow? [[User:DiogenesNY|DiogenesNY]] ([[User talk:DiogenesNY|talk]]) 06:23, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
276980 +++$+++ Zeborah +++$+++ Dhartung +++$+++ 276978 +++$+++ 276978 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.198912200E09 +++$+++ Someone has just added a line to the article asserting notability in that \"She is one of two confirmed women to have been decorated for bravery in battle in Sweden before the 1900s.\" I don't know the source of the \"two confirmed women\" part, but even if this phrasing were deleted, the original source does say she was decorated for bravery in battle (\"Med anledning av detta tilldelades hon medaljen f\xf6r tapperhet i f\xe4lt.\") Certainly many women have fought in wartime but few indeed, particularly in such an era, have been decorated for it, and this seems a reasonable fact on which to base notability: see WP:BIO \"The person has received significant recognized awards or honors.\" -- +++$+++ : Someone has just added a line to the article asserting notability in that "She is one of two confirmed women to have been decorated for bravery in battle in Sweden before the 1900s." I don't know the source of the "two confirmed women" part, but even if this phrasing were deleted, the original source does say she was decorated for bravery in battle ("Med anledning av detta tilldelades hon medaljen för tapperhet i fält.") Certainly many women have fought in wartime but few indeed, particularly in such an era, have been decorated for it, and this seems a reasonable fact on which to base notability: see WP:BIO "The person has received significant recognized awards or honors." --[[User:Zeborah|Zeborah]] ([[User talk:Zeborah|talk]]) 23:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

14835 +++$+++ Bogic +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-25 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.303790220E09 +++$+++ Now, Ukraine hasn't U-23 team, but if U-21 qualify in the next tournament to the finals (In June 2011) it will be such a team, just like at the Olympic Games are the national U-23 teams. See [[:Category:European national under-23 association football teams]].  +++$+++ Now, Ukraine hasn't U-23 team, but if U-21 qualify in the next tournament to the finals (In June 2011) it will be such a team, just like at the Olympic Games are the national U-23 teams. See [[:Category:European national under-23 association football teams]]. [[User:Bogic|Bogic]] ([[User talk:Bogic|talk]]) 20:57, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
14836 +++$+++ Bogic +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14835 +++$+++ 14835 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.303793160E09 +++$+++ Please, wait to June 2011.  +++$+++ :Please, wait to June 2011. [[User:Bogic|Bogic]] ([[User talk:Bogic|talk]]) 21:46, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

89854 +++$+++ Jwinius +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ 89854 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-20 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.187646240E09 +++$+++ Regarding your note on Day (1981) being the \"main reference for the article\", if you believe the entire text in the Description section is true to this publication, then we should cite it as an inline reference. I can easily do this, but perhaps you could then be so good as to provide a few more details about the book: the number of  printed pages, the name and location of the publisher and the ISBN number. Cheers! -- +++$+++ Regarding your note on Day (1981) being the "main reference for the article", if you believe the entire text in the Description section is true to this publication, then we should cite it as an inline reference. I can easily do this, but perhaps you could then be so good as to provide a few more details about the book: the number of  printed pages, the name and location of the publisher and the ISBN number. Cheers! --[[User:Jwinius|Jwinius]] 14:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
89855 +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ 89854 +++$+++ 89854 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.187647860E09 +++$+++ First, the whole description section, the common name , the date of extinction, the reason for its disappearance can be find in the Reference by D. Day. An secondly all sources (including the IUCN source) known by myself are given only Round Island  for the range of Bolyeria. It might be that Bolyeria have a wider range in prehistoric times, but in historic times it seems that it only occurred on Round Island. -- +++$+++ :First, the whole description section, the common name , the date of extinction, the reason for its disappearance can be find in the Reference by D. Day. An secondly all sources (including the IUCN source) known by myself are given only Round Island  for the range of Bolyeria. It might be that Bolyeria have a wider range in prehistoric times, but in historic times it seems that it only occurred on Round Island. --[[User:Melly42|Melly42]] 15:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
89856 +++$+++ Jwinius +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ 89854 +++$+++ 89855 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.187650020E09 +++$+++ There's no need to get defensive; I was just telling you what I know, what I did, and want this to be resolved reasonably. If you got your information from Day (1981), that's fine. Our different sources don't mean to disagree with each other, although it may sometimes seem that way. It may be the case that neither species has been seen anywhere else except on Round Island for the last 100 years, but the first distribution records are hardly paleontological and deserve to be quoted also. However, we can make sure that everyone understands that the last place it was reported was on Round Island (in 1975). Now, if you'll be so kind as to supply me with that book information... -- +++$+++ ::There's no need to get defensive; I was just telling you what I know, what I did, and want this to be resolved reasonably. If you got your information from Day (1981), that's fine. Our different sources don't mean to disagree with each other, although it may sometimes seem that way. It may be the case that neither species has been seen anywhere else except on Round Island for the last 100 years, but the first distribution records are hardly paleontological and deserve to be quoted also. However, we can make sure that everyone understands that the last place it was reported was on Round Island (in 1975). Now, if you'll be so kind as to supply me with that book information... --[[User:Jwinius|Jwinius]] 15:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

14838 +++$+++ RepublicanJacobite +++$+++ Aleksandr Grigoryev +++$+++ 14838 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.312326720E09 +++$+++ [[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Soundtrack of O Brother, Where Art Thou?]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Soundtrack of O Brother, Where Art Thou?|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <font face=\"Georgia\">''' +++$+++ [[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Soundtrack of O Brother, Where Art Thou?]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Soundtrack of O Brother, Where Art Thou?|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <font face="Georgia">'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]'''<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">TheFortyFive</span>]]''</sub></font> 16:12, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
14839 +++$+++ Nvvchar +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14838 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.294955160E09 +++$+++ I would appreciate if you could help. I tried but was not successful.--''' +++$+++ :*I would appreciate if you could help. I tried but was not successful.--'''[[User talk:Nvvchar|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#003366">Nvvchar</span>]]'''. 13:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

276984 +++$+++ Mysid +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276984 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-12 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.129142820E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've replaced the [[1-up Mushroom]] screenshot you uploaded ([[:Image:1upmushroom.jpg]]) with a PNG version ([[:Image:1upmushroom.png]]). The new file is 99% smaller and is losslessly compressed. I've listed the original for [[WP:IFD|deletion]], hope this is OK.  +++$+++ Hi, I've replaced the [[1-up Mushroom]] screenshot you uploaded ([[:Image:1upmushroom.jpg]]) with a PNG version ([[:Image:1upmushroom.png]]). The new file is 99% smaller and is losslessly compressed. I've listed the original for [[WP:IFD|deletion]], hope this is OK. [[User:Mysid|Mysid]] [[User_talk:Mysid|(<font color="#996600">talk</font>)]] 11:47, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
276985 +++$+++ Mysid +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276984 +++$+++ 276984 +++$+++ 2005-12-09 07:19:00 +++$+++ 1.134141540E09 +++$+++ The same applies to [[:Image:Independentist Flag of Chechnya.jpg]] which is up for deletion and has been replaced with [[:Image:Independentist Flag of Chechnya.png]]. &ndash; +++$+++ :The same applies to [[:Image:Independentist Flag of Chechnya.jpg]] which is up for deletion and has been replaced with [[:Image:Independentist Flag of Chechnya.png]]. &ndash;[[User:Mysid|Mysid]] 07:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

46164 +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-02 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.307018820E09 +++$+++ I saw the article was missing this existing animation, [[:File:SE2045Aug12T.gif]], so I added it.  +++$+++ I saw the article was missing this existing animation, [[:File:SE2045Aug12T.gif]], so I added it. [[User:Tomruen|Tom Ruen]] ([[User talk:Tomruen#top|talk]]) 05:47, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
46165 +++$+++ Timl2k4 +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46164 +++$+++ 46164 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.307019120E09 +++$+++ I don't know if there is an automated process you can do to create these in a batch, but what you create is way better than the NASA animations IMO. (More to come.)  +++$+++ : I don't know if there is an automated process you can do to create these in a batch, but what you create is way better than the NASA animations IMO. (More to come.) [[User:Timl2k4|TimL]] ([[User talk:Timl2k4|talk]]) 05:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
46166 +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46164 +++$+++ 46164 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.307068320E09 +++$+++ The animations must be one-by-one for now, but I can generate a sequence of images by automation, picking a view, start time, and time interval, and number of frames. I really need to add a view option that keeps the view over the same lat\/long, rather than letting the earth rotate away. The NASA images are limited to like 1990-2050, so it is nice I can make any, including \"Halley's eclipse\" over England, [[Solar_eclipse_of_May_3,_1715]], amazing to compare his map to the modern calculations!  +++$+++ : The animations must be one-by-one for now, but I can generate a sequence of images by automation, picking a view, start time, and time interval, and number of frames. I really need to add a view option that keeps the view over the same lat/long, rather than letting the earth rotate away. The NASA images are limited to like 1990-2050, so it is nice I can make any, including "Halley's eclipse" over England, [[Solar_eclipse_of_May_3,_1715]], amazing to compare his map to the modern calculations! [[User:Tomruen|Tom Ruen]] ([[User talk:Tomruen#top|talk]]) 19:32, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
46167 +++$+++ Timl2k4 +++$+++ Tomruen +++$+++ 46164 +++$+++ 46166 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.307164020E09 +++$+++ That is really cool what you can do. Another idea would be to keep the view centered on the eclipse.  +++$+++ :: That is really cool what you can do. Another idea would be to keep the view centered on the eclipse. [[User:Timl2k4|TimL]] ([[User talk:Timl2k4|talk]]) 22:07, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

276986 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276986 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-04 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.144202460E09 +++$+++ And the Government of Ontario considers Masters College and Seminary a private-degree granting \"instutition.\"[http:\/\/www.edu.gov.on.ca\/eng\/general\/priv_deg.html] Just because it uses the name [[University]] doesn't make it so.  +++$+++ And the Government of Ontario considers Masters College and Seminary a private-degree granting "instutition."[http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/general/priv_deg.html] Just because it uses the name [[University]] doesn't make it so. [[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]] 19:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
276987 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276986 +++$+++ 276986 +++$+++ 2006-04-04 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.144203960E09 +++$+++ I still don't see why you insist that it's not a university.  If the Government of Manitoba considers it a university, who are you to say it's not?  CMU grants at least one common university degree, the Bachelor of Arts, and is considered by its governing authority (the Government of Manitoba) to be a university.  What type of learning institution Ontario considers a school in its jurisdiction to be is totally irrelevant (in addition, the only Bachelor degrees offered by the college you mentioned are religious in nature--not so for CMU).  +++$+++ : I still don't see why you insist that it's not a university.  If the Government of Manitoba considers it a university, who are you to say it's not?  CMU grants at least one common university degree, the Bachelor of Arts, and is considered by its governing authority (the Government of Manitoba) to be a university.  What type of learning institution Ontario considers a school in its jurisdiction to be is totally irrelevant (in addition, the only Bachelor degrees offered by the college you mentioned are religious in nature--not so for CMU). [[User:Osgoodelawyer|Osgoodelawyer]] 19:26, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
276988 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276986 +++$+++ 276987 +++$+++ 2006-04-04 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.144211160E09 +++$+++ And the Government of Alberta[http:\/\/www.advancededucation.gov.ab.ca\/college\/postsecsystem\/postsecinst\/postsecinst.asp] wouldn't recognize it as a University, but as a \"Private College accredited to grant degrees.\" We have one standard on Wikipedia, not one based on the whim of one province.  +++$+++ ::And the Government of Alberta[http://www.advancededucation.gov.ab.ca/college/postsecsystem/postsecinst/postsecinst.asp] wouldn't recognize it as a University, but as a "Private College accredited to grant degrees." We have one standard on Wikipedia, not one based on the whim of one province. [[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]] 21:26, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
276989 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276986 +++$+++ 276988 +++$+++ 2006-04-04 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.144214220E09 +++$+++ The \"whim\" of a province?  It's a Canadian province, not some backwater country.  Let's say that we ''should'' have some kind of a standard independent of the competent government bodies that make these decisions in the \"real world\".  Explain why your standard is the correct one. Maybe a broader definition is in order--I mean, if bodies such as provincial and state governments are granting charters for the creation of universities that some Wikipedians do not currently consider universities, then perhaps we need to re-evaluate our understanding of the word.  If not, someone will, of course, have to change all the references in the CMU article from \"university\" (aside from the name) to \"private college accredited to grant degrees\".  +++$+++ ::: The "whim" of a province?  It's a Canadian province, not some backwater country.  Let's say that we ''should'' have some kind of a standard independent of the competent government bodies that make these decisions in the "real world".  Explain why your standard is the correct one. Maybe a broader definition is in order--I mean, if bodies such as provincial and state governments are granting charters for the creation of universities that some Wikipedians do not currently consider universities, then perhaps we need to re-evaluate our understanding of the word.  If not, someone will, of course, have to change all the references in the CMU article from "university" (aside from the name) to "private college accredited to grant degrees". [[User:Osgoodelawyer|Osgoodelawyer]] 22:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
276990 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276986 +++$+++ 276989 +++$+++ 2006-04-04 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.144215420E09 +++$+++ I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on this, because I'm not going to argue about it with you.  [[WP:DR|Dispute resolution]] is a good start if you still don't like it. -- +++$+++ :::: I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on this, because I'm not going to argue about it with you.  [[WP:DR|Dispute resolution]] is a good start if you still don't like it. --[[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]] 22:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
276991 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276986 +++$+++ 276990 +++$+++ 2006-04-04 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.144215780E09 +++$+++ Okay, but one final word: If we went by Alberta's rules for universities, a large number of universities the world over (including, to take three examples [[Duke University]], the [[University of Notre Dame]], and [[Brigham Young University]]) would not be considered universities if they were located in Alberta, seeing as they are privately funded and operated.  We clearly cannot go by that definition.  +++$+++ ::::: Okay, but one final word: If we went by Alberta's rules for universities, a large number of universities the world over (including, to take three examples [[Duke University]], the [[University of Notre Dame]], and [[Brigham Young University]]) would not be considered universities if they were located in Alberta, seeing as they are privately funded and operated.  We clearly cannot go by that definition. [[User:Osgoodelawyer|Osgoodelawyer]] 22:43, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

276992 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-05 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.144221900E09 +++$+++ Remember to always [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign all of your posts]] on [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]].  Typing four tildes after your comment ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) will insert a signature showing your [[Wikipedia:Username|username]] and a date\/time stamp, which is very helpful. <!-- Template:Tilde -->  +++$+++ Remember to always [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign all of your posts]] on [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]].  Typing four tildes after your comment ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) will insert a signature showing your [[Wikipedia:Username|username]] and a date/time stamp, which is very helpful. <!-- Template:Tilde --> [[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]] 00:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
276993 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276992 +++$+++ 276992 +++$+++ 2006-04-05 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.144222080E09 +++$+++ Aye, it was a simple oversight.  +++$+++ : Aye, it was a simple oversight. [[User:Osgoodelawyer|Osgoodelawyer]] 00:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

14849 +++$+++ Spinningspark +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-15 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.305517380E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Refah Tragedy]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Refah Tragedy|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Refah Tragedy]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Refah Tragedy|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#FFF090;color:#00C000">'''Sp<font style="background:#FFF0A0;color:#80C000">in<font style="color:#C08000">ni</font></font><font style="color:#C00000">ng</font></font><font style="color:#2820F0">Spark'''</font>]] 20:43, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
14850 +++$+++ Spinningspark +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14849 +++$+++ 14849 +++$+++ 2011-05-18 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.305763920E09 +++$+++ A good place to ask for copyediting for English is [[WP:EAR]].  There is also [[WP:PR]] but that is really for the more well developed articles.  I would recommend in future that you get articles checked over while they are still in your userspace, and certainly before you submit them to DYK.  +++$+++ :A good place to ask for copyediting for English is [[WP:EAR]].  There is also [[WP:PR]] but that is really for the more well developed articles.  I would recommend in future that you get articles checked over while they are still in your userspace, and certainly before you submit them to DYK. [[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#FFF090;color:#00C000">'''Sp<font style="background:#FFF0A0;color:#80C000">in<font style="color:#C08000">ni</font></font><font style="color:#C00000">ng</font></font><font style="color:#2820F0">Spark'''</font>]] 17:12, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

264619 +++$+++ Serious About Comedy +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-15 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.242381660E09 +++$+++ Hi, I am trying to change [[Edinburgh Fringe]] to a redirect and [[Edinburgh Festival Fringe]] to the actual article.  When I try using the move tab I get an error message.  Hope you can help, thanks. +++$+++ Hi, I am trying to change [[Edinburgh Fringe]] to a redirect and [[Edinburgh Festival Fringe]] to the actual article.  When I try using the move tab I get an error message.  Hope you can help, thanks.[[User:Serious About Comedy|Serious About Comedy]] ([[User talk:Serious About Comedy|talk]]) 03:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
264620 +++$+++ Serious About Comedy +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264619 +++$+++ 264619 +++$+++ 2009-05-16 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.242518040E09 +++$+++ Thanks! +++$+++ :Thanks![[User:Serious About Comedy|Serious About Comedy]] ([[User talk:Serious About Comedy|talk]]) 16:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
264621 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264619 +++$+++ 264620 +++$+++ 2009-05-16 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.242518220E09 +++$+++ No bother. :)  +++$+++ ::No bother. :) [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:57, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

276996 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276996 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-07 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.144456320E09 +++$+++ Our own page on [[Ivory Coast]] is now correctly in English.  +++$+++ Our own page on [[Ivory Coast]] is now correctly in English. [[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]] 17:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
276997 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276996 +++$+++ 276996 +++$+++ 2006-04-07 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.144459860E09 +++$+++ [[WP:IAR]], [[WP:BOLD]].  +++$+++ :[[WP:IAR]], [[WP:BOLD]]. [[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]] 18:31, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
276998 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276996 +++$+++ 276997 +++$+++ 2006-04-07 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.144460340E09 +++$+++ Okay Ardenn, you win.  Let's quote the rules when it suits us and a very sketchy \"ignore all rules 'principle' when they don't.  +++$+++ ::Okay Ardenn, you win.  Let's quote the rules when it suits us and a very sketchy "ignore all rules 'principle' when they don't. [[User:Osgoodelawyer|Osgoodelawyer]] 18:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
276999 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276996 +++$+++ 276998 +++$+++ 2006-04-07 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.144461540E09 +++$+++ [[WP:DICK|Don't be a dick.]].  +++$+++ :::[[WP:DICK|Don't be a dick.]]. [[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]] 18:59, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
277000 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276996 +++$+++ 276999 +++$+++ 2006-04-07 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.144461780E09 +++$+++ Can't help it--it's in my blood. Although if it wasn't my [[nature versus nurture|nature]], you'd sure help [[nature versus nurture|nurture]] it.  +++$+++ ::::Can't help it--it's in my blood. Although if it wasn't my [[nature versus nurture|nature]], you'd sure help [[nature versus nurture|nurture]] it. [[User:Osgoodelawyer|Osgoodelawyer]] 19:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
277001 +++$+++ MSJapan +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 276996 +++$+++ 277000 +++$+++ 2006-04-08 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.144490520E09 +++$+++ The fact remains that if you Google it, you get more correct hits on \"Grand Lodge of the Ivory Coast\" than you do on \"Grand Lodge of Cote d'Ivoire\".  Furthermore, you don't see \"Ireland\" redirecting to \"Eire\" or \"Japan\" redirecting to \"Yamato\" or \"Nippon\", so I would have to say that there's a real good chance that the English name is official at least as far as the English-language Wikipedia is concerned.  As a matter of fact, the native language name should be referenced at the beginning of the article.  I'd also wager that Ardenn's change was entirely in keeping with the style guidelines.  +++$+++ :::::The fact remains that if you Google it, you get more correct hits on "Grand Lodge of the Ivory Coast" than you do on "Grand Lodge of Cote d'Ivoire".  Furthermore, you don't see "Ireland" redirecting to "Eire" or "Japan" redirecting to "Yamato" or "Nippon", so I would have to say that there's a real good chance that the English name is official at least as far as the English-language Wikipedia is concerned.  As a matter of fact, the native language name should be referenced at the beginning of the article.  I'd also wager that Ardenn's change was entirely in keeping with the style guidelines. [[User:MSJapan|MSJapan]] 03:02, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

539142 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-28 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.170023880E09 +++$+++ \u0422\u043e\u0439 \u0437\u0430\u043f\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0430 \u043f\u044a\u0440\u0432\u0438, \u0430\u0437\u0441 \u043d\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u044f \u043d\u044f\u043a\u0430\u043a\u0432\u0438 \u0441\u0438 \u0441\u044a\u0440\u0431\u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u0438\u0436\u0434\u0430\u0442 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0430. \u041a\u0430\u043a\u0442\u043e \u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u0435, \u043c\u0438\u0441\u044a\u0442\u0430 \u043c\u0438 \u0435 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0430: \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0448 \u043b\u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0448 \u0441\u043d\u0438\u043c\u043a\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0442\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0438\u0438\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0438 \u0441\u044a\u043a\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0449\u0430 \u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f? \u041d\u0430 \u043c\u043e\u044f \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u044e\u0442\u044a\u0440 \u043d\u0435\u0449\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u0430\u043b\u044f\u043c \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u043d\u043a\u0438, \u0438\u043c\u0430 \u043d\u0435\u0449\u043e \u0431\u044a\u0433\u0430\u0432\u043e. \u0410\u043a\u043e \u0438\u043c\u0430\u0448 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435, \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438 \u0433\u043e. \u0418 \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0434\u0430 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u044f\u043c \u043d\u044f\u043a\u043e\u044f \u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0431\u0438\u0442\u043a\u0430 \u0432 \u0431\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u043e-\u0432\u0438\u0437\u0430\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0438\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u0432\u043e\u0439\u043d\u0438, \u0442\u0430\u043c \u043a\u044f\u0434\u0435\u0442\u043e \u0441\u0430 \u0438\u0437\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0438 \u043f\u043e \u0445\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0438\u0447\u0435\u043d \u0440\u0435\u0434? \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0437\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u0419\u043e\u0430\u043d \u0410\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044a\u0440, \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0442\u0440\u044f\u0431\u0432\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0434\u0435\u043b \u0437\u0430 \u0432\u0441\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0438 \u0431\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0438, \u043a\u043e\u0433\u0430 \u0449\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0435 \u044f\u0441\u043d\u043e \u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u043d\u043e\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0435 \u0443\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0448\u043d\u0430? \u0421\u044a\u0436\u0430\u043b\u044f\u0432\u0430\u043c, \u0447\u0435 \u0442\u0438 \u0433\u0443\u0431\u044f \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043e \u0441 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0438\u0432\u0430 \u0433\u043b\u0443\u043f\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u043d\u043e \u0441\u0438 \u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043c \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u044e\u0442\u044a\u0440\u0435\u043d \u0438\u043d\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0434 (\u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e \u0437\u0430 \u0438\u0433\u0440\u0438 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043c...). -- +++$+++ Той започна първи, азс не мога да оставя някакви си сърби да обиждат страната. Както и да е, мисъта ми е друга: можеш ли да свалиш снимки на тракииските ни съкровища и карти на средновекова България? На моя компютър нещо не мога да свалям картинки, има нещо бъгаво. Ако имаш време, направи го. И как да добавям някоя нова битка в българо-византииски войни, там кядето са изписани по хронологичен ред? Поздравления за статията за Йоан Александър, това трябва да е модел за всички български владетели, кога ще стане ясно дали номинацията е успешна? Съжалявам, че ти губя времето с такива глупусти, но си оставам компютърен инвалид (само за игри ставам...). --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 14:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
539143 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539142 +++$+++ 539142 +++$+++ 2007-01-28 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.170025380E09 +++$+++ \u0411\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u044f \u0437\u0430 \u043e\u0442\u0433\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0435. \u0417\u043d\u0430\u0447\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0448 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435 \u0441\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u043b\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u043d\u043a\u0438 \u043e\u0442 \u041d\u0418\u041c: P1070688, P10700716, P1070765, P1070804, P1070805, P1070817. \u0410\u043a\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u0435 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043e\u0435\u043c\u043a\u043e \u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433 \u043f\u044a\u0442 \u0449\u0435 \u0441\u0435 \u0432\u044a\u0437\u043f\u043e\u043b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043c \u043e\u0442 \u0443\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0442\u0438: ) : ) : ) \u041a\u0430\u0442\u043e \u0433\u0438 \u0441\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0448 \u043a\u044a\u0434\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0433\u0438 \u0442\u044a\u0440\u0441\u044f? -- +++$+++ :Благодаря за отговорите. Значи като намериш време свали ледните картинки от НИМ: P1070688, P10700716, P1070765, P1070804, P1070805, P1070817. Ако не е много трудоемко и друг път ще се възползвам от услугите ти: ) : ) : ) Като ги свалиш къде да ги търся? --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 15:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

539144 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539144 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-29 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.170103260E09 +++$+++ \u0411\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 : ) : ) : ) \u0429\u0435 \u0441\u0430 \u043c\u0438 \u043e\u0442 \u0433\u043e\u043b\u044f\u043c\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0437\u0430; \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u044a\u043b\u0436\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0439 \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0448 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e \u0442\u0430\u0437\u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u0411-\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0437 1371 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u041f\u0440\u0435\u0441\u043b\u0430\u0432 (\u0438 \u0441 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e \u0446\u044f\u043b\u043e). \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438: ) -- +++$+++ Благодарности : ) : ) : ) Ще са ми от голяма полза; продължавай да правиш карти като тази за Б-я през 1371 или Преслав (и с добрата работа като цяло). Поздрави: ) --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 12:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
539145 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539144 +++$+++ 539144 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.170216540E09 +++$+++ \u0421\u0435\u0433\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043e\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0445 \u043d\u044f\u043a\u043e\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0449\u0430 \u0432 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u0414\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0443\u0434\u0436\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e \u0434\u0435\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0438 \u0430\u043a\u043e \u043d\u044f\u043a\u043e\u0438 \u0440\u0443\u043c\u044a\u043d\u0446\u0438 \u0438\u043c\u0430\u0442 \u043d\u0435\u0449\u043e \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0442\u0438\u0432, \u043f\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0433\u0430\u0439 \u0432 \u0434\u0438\u0441\u043a\u0443\u0441\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430. \u041e\u043c\u0440\u044a\u0437\u043d\u0430 \u043c\u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u0444\u0430\u043b\u0448\u0438\u0444\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0440\u0430\u0442 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0438 \u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u043f\u0438\u0448\u0430\u0442 \u043d\u0435\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043d\u0438 \u0438 \u043d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0449\u0430 \u0438 \u0441\u043c\u044f\u0442\u0430\u043c \u0434\u0430 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u044f\u043c\u0435 \u0442\u0438\u044f \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0438. -- +++$+++ :Сега пооправих някои неща в статията за Добруджанското деспотство и ако някои румънци имат нещо напротив, помагай в дискусията. Омръзна ми да фалшифицират историята ни и да се пишат неверни и необосновани неща и смятам да оправяме тия работи. --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 20:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

14857 +++$+++ Salvio giuliano +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-26 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.309130100E09 +++$+++ Hello CeeGee, I've just declined your speedy and tuned [[2010 World University Boxing Championship]] into a redirect to the page; I believe that the former is the correct name; however, I'm not sure. If I was wrong, feel free to turn it into a redirect to the latter. I thought that a speedy deletion per [[WP:CSD#A10|A10]] was inappropriate, because the page with the wrong title can be a useful redirect to the other. Happy editing. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml\">  ''' +++$+++ Hello CeeGee, I've just declined your speedy and tuned [[2010 World University Boxing Championship]] into a redirect to the page; I believe that the former is the correct name; however, I'm not sure. If I was wrong, feel free to turn it into a redirect to the latter. I thought that a speedy deletion per [[WP:CSD#A10|A10]] was inappropriate, because the page with the wrong title can be a useful redirect to the other. Happy editing. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">  '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> [[User talk:Salvio giuliano| <sup>Let's talk about it!</sup>]] 16:15, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
14858 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14857 +++$+++ 14857 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.309139460E09 +++$+++ The [http:\/\/www.fisu.net\/en\/Boxing-2010-1701.html official site] says \"Championship\" and not \"Championships\". The redirection you conducted should be in reverse way. Please check and fix it in accordance. BTW, I accept your proposal not to delete the duplication. Thanks and cheers.  +++$+++ :The [http://www.fisu.net/en/Boxing-2010-1701.html official site] says "Championship" and not "Championships". The redirection you conducted should be in reverse way. Please check and fix it in accordance. BTW, I accept your proposal not to delete the duplication. Thanks and cheers. [[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee#top|talk]]) 18:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
14859 +++$+++ Salvio giuliano +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14857 +++$+++ 14858 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.309139880E09 +++$+++ {{Done}}. Cheers. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml\">  ''' +++$+++ ::{{Done}}. Cheers. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">  '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> [[User talk:Salvio giuliano| <sup>Let's talk about it!</sup>]] 18:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

277002 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-07 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.144462620E09 +++$+++ Nothing you or he said was profane, I was using his own edit summary. If someone removes my messages from their talk page, I do the same in return.  +++$+++ Nothing you or he said was profane, I was using his own edit summary. If someone removes my messages from their talk page, I do the same in return. [[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]] 19:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
277003 +++$+++ WCityMike +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277002 +++$+++ 277002 +++$+++ 2006-04-23 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.145779020E09 +++$+++ I did not remove your messages from my talk page, which is [[Wikipedia:Talk_page#Etiquette|frowned upon]].  I [[User_talk:WCityMike\/Archive_1|archived]]. &mdash;  +++$+++ :I did not remove your messages from my talk page, which is [[Wikipedia:Talk_page#Etiquette|frowned upon]].  I [[User_talk:WCityMike/Archive_1|archived]]. &mdash; [[User:WCityMike|WCityMike]] ([[User_talk:WCityMike|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/WCityMike|contribs]]) 00:57, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
277004 +++$+++ WCityMike +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277002 +++$+++ 277003 +++$+++ 2006-04-23 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.145782260E09 +++$+++ Both Arden and yourself have indicated that this comment had nothing to do with my disagreement with Ardenn, and, looking at the time, I should have known this.  With respect to this particular misassumption (but with respect to ''no other element'' of my disagreements with you, Ardenn), I apologize. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::Both Arden and yourself have indicated that this comment had nothing to do with my disagreement with Ardenn, and, looking at the time, I should have known this.  With respect to this particular misassumption (but with respect to ''no other element'' of my disagreements with you, Ardenn), I apologize. &mdash; [[User:WCityMike|WCityMike]] ([[User_talk:WCityMike|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/WCityMike|contribs]]) 01:51, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

14860 +++$+++ Gurt Posh +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-29 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.309377720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions. I notice you've added a few on amateur boxers, but they don't seem to meet notability guidelines under [[WP:NSPORT#Boxing]]. Is there anything else that can be added to your last three articles to establish notability?  I've tagged all three. Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions. I notice you've added a few on amateur boxers, but they don't seem to meet notability guidelines under [[WP:NSPORT#Boxing]]. Is there anything else that can be added to your last three articles to establish notability?  I've tagged all three. Thanks, [[User:Gurt Posh|Gurt Posh]] ([[User talk:Gurt Posh|talk]]) 13:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
14861 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14860 +++$+++ 14860 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.309377900E09 +++$+++ Question: Are they not considered to be notable even they have won medals at international events? Thanks and cheers.  +++$+++ :Question: Are they not considered to be notable even they have won medals at international events? Thanks and cheers. [[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee#top|talk]]) 13:05, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
14862 +++$+++ Gurt Posh +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14860 +++$+++ 14861 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.309378080E09 +++$+++ For amateur events, bronze medals don't seem to be enough. Have any of them received substantial coverage from [[WP:Secondary]], [[WP:Reliable sources]]?  Turkish-language coverage would do fine, as long as they're reliable sources (not blogs, university newsletters, etc.). Thanks,  +++$+++ ::For amateur events, bronze medals don't seem to be enough. Have any of them received substantial coverage from [[WP:Secondary]], [[WP:Reliable sources]]?  Turkish-language coverage would do fine, as long as they're reliable sources (not blogs, university newsletters, etc.). Thanks, [[User:Gurt Posh|Gurt Posh]] ([[User talk:Gurt Posh|talk]]) 13:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
14863 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14860 +++$+++ 14861 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.309378740E09 +++$+++ [[Muhammet \xc7at]]: two nationwide newspapers.  +++$+++ :*[[Muhammet Çat]]: two nationwide newspapers. [[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee#top|talk]]) 13:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
14864 +++$+++ Gurt Posh +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14860 +++$+++ 14861 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.309380360E09 +++$+++ Those are passing mentions, so could you find something more substantial?  I'll also hunt for some.  +++$+++ ::Those are passing mentions, so could you find something more substantial?  I'll also hunt for some. [[User:Gurt Posh|Gurt Posh]] ([[User talk:Gurt Posh|talk]]) 13:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

539150 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-31 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.170288060E09 +++$+++ \u0415\u0442\u043e, \u0441\u0435\u0433\u0430 \u0440\u0443\u043c\u044a\u043d\u0446\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u044f\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u0414\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0443\u0434\u0436\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e \u0434\u0435\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e. \u041c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0448 \u043b\u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0448 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0445\u043e\u0434\u044f\u0449\u0438 \u0438\u0437\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0438 \u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0433\u043d\u0435\u0448 \u0432 \u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0430? \u041d\u0435\u043a\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043c\u043e\u043b\u0438\u043c \u0438 Imlajov \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0438. \u0427\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u043e \u0437\u0430 \u0418\u0432\u0430\u043d \u0410\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u044a\u0440 : ) : ) : ) -- +++$+++ Ето, сега румънците спорят за Добруджанското деспотство. Можеш ли да намериш подходящи източници и да помогнеш в спора? Нека да помолим и Imlajov да се включи. Честито за Иван Александър : ) : ) : ) --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 16:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
539151 +++$+++ Jackanapes +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539150 +++$+++ 539150 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.170446940E09 +++$+++ \u0423\u0432\u0438, \u0440\u0443\u043c\u044a\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432 \u0442\u0430\u0437\u0438 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u044a\u043b\u0436\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0442 \u0434\u0430 \u0432\u0438\u043b\u043d\u0435\u044f\u0442... \u0414\u0440\u0430\u0433\u0438 \u0422\u043e\u0434\u043e\u0440\u0435, \u043e\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u043d\u043e \u044e\u0436\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0414\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0443\u0434\u0436\u0430. \u0421\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0434 \u041f\u0435\u0442\u044a\u0440 \u041c\u0443\u0442\u0430\u0444\u0447\u0438\u0435\u0432 \u0432 \"\u0414\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0443\u0434\u0436\u0430. \u0421\u0431\u043e\u0440\u043d\u0438\u043a \u043e\u0442 \u0441\u0442\u0443\u0434\u0438\u0438\", \u0444\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0442\u0438\u043f\u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0438\u0437\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u0418\u0437\u0434\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0421\u0442\u0435\u0444\u0430\u043d\u043a\u0430 \u0411\u0430\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430, \u0421\u043e\u0444\u0438\u044f, 1999, \u0441\u0442\u0440. 22, \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u043d\u043e \u0438 \u041f\u0440\u0435\u0441\u043b\u0430\u0432, \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0438\u0440\u0430\u0449 \u0441\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u044e\u0433\u043e\u0437\u0430\u043f\u0430\u0434 \u043e\u0442 \u0428\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d, \u0435 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442 \u043e\u0442 \u0414\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0443\u0434\u0436\u0430. \u041f\u0440\u0438\u0435\u043c\u0438 \u043c\u043e\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438,  +++$+++ :Уви, румънските националисти в тази статия продължават да вилнеят... Драги Тодоре, относно южната граница на Добруджа. Според Петър Мутафчиев в "Добруджа. Сборник от студии", фототипно преиздание на Издателство Стефанка Банкова, София, 1999, стр. 22, включително и Преслав, намиращ се на югозапад от Шумен, е част от Добруджа. Приеми моите поздрави, [[User:Jackanapes|Jackanapes]] 12:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

277007 +++$+++  +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277007 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Hey all, Osgoodelawyer (the non-admin) chiming in here. I wasn't aware of all that had gone down before InShaneee blocked Ardenn, but from the reason given by InShaneee on Ardenn's talk page, it didn't seem like there was real justification to block him\u2014certainly not for a full two days\u2014and that's why I made the comment I did on InShaneee's page. However, I was unaware of some of the earlier things said, including the \"STFU\" comment noted above (which I actually can't find, but which I assume is somewhere), and I agree that's certainly deserving of a block. I've had my share of problems with Ardenn myself, but I've been trying to help out a bit, knowing that he's also done a lot of good. Perhaps, though, a good 48 hours away from Wikipedia will help cool his head. -- OsgoodeLawyer 13:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ Hey all, Osgoodelawyer (the non-admin) chiming in here. I wasn't aware of all that had gone down before InShaneee blocked Ardenn, but from the reason given by InShaneee on Ardenn's talk page, it didn't seem like there was real justification to block him—certainly not for a full two days—and that's why I made the comment I did on InShaneee's page. However, I was unaware of some of the earlier things said, including the "STFU" comment noted above (which I actually can't find, but which I assume is somewhere), and I agree that's certainly deserving of a block. I've had my share of problems with Ardenn myself, but I've been trying to help out a bit, knowing that he's also done a lot of good. Perhaps, though, a good 48 hours away from Wikipedia will help cool his head. -- OsgoodeLawyer 13:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
277008 +++$+++ WCityMike +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277007 +++$+++ 277007 +++$+++ 2006-04-23 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.145833020E09 +++$+++ See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal\/Cases\/2006-04-22_Noosphere&diff=prev&oldid=49549550 here], or, alternatively, go [[Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal\/Cases\/2006-04-22_Noosphere|here]] and look at the seventh line under the 'Discussion' section. &mdash;  +++$+++ :See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-04-22_Noosphere&diff=prev&oldid=49549550 here], or, alternatively, go [[Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-04-22_Noosphere|here]] and look at the seventh line under the 'Discussion' section. &mdash; [[User:WCityMike|WCityMike]] ([[User_talk:WCityMike|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/WCityMike|contribs]]) 15:57, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
277009 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277007 +++$+++ 277008 +++$+++ 2006-04-23 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.145839740E09 +++$+++ Yes, I found the comment afterward. That kind of behaviour is obviously not kosher. --  +++$+++ ::Yes, I found the comment afterward. That kind of behaviour is obviously not kosher. -- [[User:Osgoodelawyer|<span style="color:#CC0000; background-color:white">'''Osgoode'''</span>]][[User talk:Osgoodelawyer|<span style="color:#444444; background-color:white">'''''Lawyer'''''</span>]] 17:49, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

262366 +++$+++ TenPoundHammer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-17 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.295264280E09 +++$+++ What's that page that lists FAs that have maintenance tags on them? <span style=\"color:green\">Ten Pound Hammer<\/span>, [[Special:Contributions\/TenPoundHammer|his otters]] and a clue-bat \u2022 <sup>( +++$+++ What's that page that lists FAs that have maintenance tags on them? <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, [[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|his otters]] and a clue-bat • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otters want attention]])</sup> 03:38, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
262367 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262366 +++$+++ 262366 +++$+++ 2011-01-17 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.295297220E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~svick\/CleanupListing\/CleanupListing.php?project=Featured_articles&sort=Count Here] if you want a complete list sortable by tag, number of tags, date of tags, etc. [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~svick\/CleanupListing\/CleanupListingByCat.php?project=Featured_articles Here] for a list by category.  +++$+++ :[http://toolserver.org/~svick/CleanupListing/CleanupListing.php?project=Featured_articles&sort=Count Here] if you want a complete list sortable by tag, number of tags, date of tags, etc. [http://toolserver.org/~svick/CleanupListing/CleanupListingByCat.php?project=Featured_articles Here] for a list by category. [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 12:47, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

439384 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 439384 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-16 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.195274340E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your comment. The template you mentioned, would have been more appropriate. So them falsely using templates, like he used, doesn't constitute vandalism?  +++$+++ Thank you for your comment. The template you mentioned, would have been more appropriate. So them falsely using templates, like he used, doesn't constitute vandalism? [[User:Ctjf83|'''<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">t</font><font color="#ffff00">j</font><font color="#009900">f</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>''']] 20:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
439385 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 439384 +++$+++ 439384 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.195279320E09 +++$+++ lol, ok thanks! :)  +++$+++ :lol, ok thanks! :) [[User:Ctjf83|'''<font color="#f00">C</font><font color="#f60">t</font><font color="#ff0">j</font><font color="#090">f</font><font color="#00f">8</font><font color="#60c">3</font>''']] 22:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
439386 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 439384 +++$+++ 439385 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.195340520E09 +++$+++ thank you for your continued advice...i'm gonna apply for an admin sometime in the near future, and need all the advice i can get!  +++$+++ :: thank you for your continued advice...i'm gonna apply for an admin sometime in the near future, and need all the advice i can get! [[User:Ctjf83|'''<font color="#f00">C</font><font color="#f60">t</font><font color="#ff0">j</font><font color="#090">f</font><font color="#00f">8</font><font color="#60c">3</font>''']] 15:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
439387 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 439384 +++$+++ 439386 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.195341420E09 +++$+++ BTW, sometimes in the contributions section it says '''(top)''' what does that mean?  +++$+++ :::BTW, sometimes in the contributions section it says '''(top)''' what does that mean? [[User:Ctjf83|'''<font color="#f00">C</font><font color="#f60">t</font><font color="#ff0">j</font><font color="#090">f</font><font color="#00f">8</font><font color="#60c">3</font>''']] 15:17, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
439388 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 439384 +++$+++ 439387 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.195342080E09 +++$+++ i can see where it is all thankless...plus i spend way too much time on wiki as it is now...but i'll prob. still try for it in a while...so i can make a bigger diff to wiki...although, like u said, it is thankless  +++$+++ ::::i can see where it is all thankless...plus i spend way too much time on wiki as it is now...but i'll prob. still try for it in a while...so i can make a bigger diff to wiki...although, like u said, it is thankless [[User:Ctjf83|'''<font color="#f00">C</font><font color="#f60">t</font><font color="#ff0">j</font><font color="#090">f</font><font color="#00f">8</font><font color="#60c">3</font>''']] 15:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

14866 +++$+++ Takabeg +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.309958640E09 +++$+++ Kategorinin ad\u0131 olarak [[:Category:Members of the Special organization of the Ottoman Empire]] nas\u0131l ?  +++$+++ Kategorinin adı olarak [[:Category:Members of the Special organization of the Ottoman Empire]] nasıl ? [[User:Takabeg|Takabeg]] ([[User talk:Takabeg|talk]]) 06:24, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
14867 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14866 +++$+++ 14866 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.309959120E09 +++$+++ Well, are not forces also organizations? \"Special organization\" does not match the structure for my POV.  +++$+++ :Well, are not forces also organizations? "Special organization" does not match the structure for my POV. [[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee#top|talk]]) 06:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
14868 +++$+++ Takabeg +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14866 +++$+++ 14867 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.309961520E09 +++$+++ Special organization is not a normal noun but a kind of [[proper noun]]. So we have to use singular: \"organization\" not plural: \"organization'''s'''\" +++$+++ :: Special organization is not a normal noun but a kind of [[proper noun]]. So we have to use singular: "organization" not plural: "organization'''s'''"[[User:Takabeg|Takabeg]] ([[User talk:Takabeg|talk]]) 07:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

539155 +++$+++ Marskell +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539155 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-03 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.170539160E09 +++$+++ Hi Todor. Thanks for your work at FAR. I noticed you nomm'ed two today. We've been advising people to try to avoid this, so as not to overload the page and to allow people work on the reviews one-by-one. I'm also concerned about the poor editors at the MiltHist wikiproject who have about six to worry about at the moment. Thanks for doing the notifications. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Todor. Thanks for your work at FAR. I noticed you nomm'ed two today. We've been advising people to try to avoid this, so as not to overload the page and to allow people work on the reviews one-by-one. I'm also concerned about the poor editors at the MiltHist wikiproject who have about six to worry about at the moment. Thanks for doing the notifications. Cheers, [[User:Marskell|Marskell]] 13:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
539156 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539155 +++$+++ 539155 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.170635220E09 +++$+++ Responded [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Marskell#WP:FAR here;] I'm sorry to have offended you - I wasn't referring to any particular editor, rather the lack of reviewers in general.  Regards,  +++$+++ :Responded [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Marskell#WP:FAR here;] I'm sorry to have offended you - I wasn't referring to any particular editor, rather the lack of reviewers in general.  Regards, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

14869 +++$+++ Takabeg +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14869 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.309963380E09 +++$+++ Hi, why did you remove [[:Category:World War I crimes by the Ottoman Empire]], [[:Category:Armenian Genocide]], [[:Category:Greek Genocide]] with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Category%3ASpecial_Organization_(Ottoman_Empire)&action=historysubmit&diff=438011778&oldid=438009761 this edit] ? Do you think we'd better put them into article directly ?  +++$+++ Hi, why did you remove [[:Category:World War I crimes by the Ottoman Empire]], [[:Category:Armenian Genocide]], [[:Category:Greek Genocide]] with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3ASpecial_Organization_(Ottoman_Empire)&action=historysubmit&diff=438011778&oldid=438009761 this edit] ? Do you think we'd better put them into article directly ? [[User:Takabeg|Takabeg]] ([[User talk:Takabeg|talk]]) 07:43, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
14870 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14869 +++$+++ 14869 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.309963440E09 +++$+++ Since irrelevant.  +++$+++ :Since irrelevant. [[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee#top|talk]]) 07:44, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
14871 +++$+++ Takabeg +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14869 +++$+++ 14870 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.309969800E09 +++$+++ Why irrelevant ? There are many sources, even in Turkish language.  +++$+++ :: Why irrelevant ? There are many sources, even in Turkish language. [[User:Takabeg|Takabeg]] ([[User talk:Takabeg|talk]]) 09:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
14872 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14869 +++$+++ 14869 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.309972440E09 +++$+++ In order to be categorized, it has to be mentioned in the article with a reference  of reliable source. Don't you think so?  +++$+++ :In order to be categorized, it has to be mentioned in the article with a reference  of reliable source. Don't you think so? [[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee#top|talk]]) 10:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
14873 +++$+++ Takabeg +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14869 +++$+++ 14872 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309973640E09 +++$+++ Not always. If it were clear that the topic is irrelevant with some categories, we can (maybe we must) remove them. But the Special Organization's relation with the Armenian Genocide and the Greek ... (I personally think that the term \"Greek genocide\" is not common.) is mentioned in articles [[Armenian Genocide]], [[Greek genocide]]. In this case, we must not remove those categories.  +++$+++ :: Not always. If it were clear that the topic is irrelevant with some categories, we can (maybe we must) remove them. But the Special Organization's relation with the Armenian Genocide and the Greek ... (I personally think that the term "Greek genocide" is not common.) is mentioned in articles [[Armenian Genocide]], [[Greek genocide]]. In this case, we must not remove those categories. [[User:Takabeg|Takabeg]] ([[User talk:Takabeg|talk]]) 10:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
14874 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14869 +++$+++ 14869 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 11:23:00 +++$+++ 1.309976580E09 +++$+++ Not logical. We cannot assume that an artical is categorized into a topic because the relationship is mentioned in another article. +++$+++ :Not logical. We cannot assume that an artical is categorized into a topic because the relationship is mentioned in another article.[[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee#top|talk]]) 11:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

277016 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-30 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.146452400E09 +++$+++ Remember to mark your edits as '''m'''inor only when they genuinely are (see [[Wikipedia:Minor edit]]). \"The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'.\" <!-- Template:Minor -->  -- <span style=\"border: 1px solid green;\"><font style=\"background: green\" face=\"Arial\" color=\"#FFFFFF\"> +++$+++ Remember to mark your edits as '''m'''inor only when they genuinely are (see [[Wikipedia:Minor edit]]). "The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'." <!-- Template:Minor -->  -- <span style="border: 1px solid green;"><font style="background: green" face="Arial" color="#FFFFFF">[[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]]</font></span> 20:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
277017 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277016 +++$+++ 277016 +++$+++ 2006-04-30 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.146453660E09 +++$+++ Exactly, but you didn't mark it as minor. As for archiving, I have no plans to do so. There are many, many people on Wikipedia who don't archive their talk pages.  <span style=\"border: 1px solid green;\"><font style=\"background: green\" face=\"Arial\" color=\"#FFFFFF\"> +++$+++ :Exactly, but you didn't mark it as minor. As for archiving, I have no plans to do so. There are many, many people on Wikipedia who don't archive their talk pages.  <span style="border: 1px solid green;"><font style="background: green" face="Arial" color="#FFFFFF">[[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]]</font></span> 20:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
277018 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277016 +++$+++ 277017 +++$+++ 2006-04-30 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.146454800E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'll keep it in mind.  <span style=\"border: 1px solid green;\"><font style=\"background: green\" face=\"Arial\" color=\"#FFFFFF\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks, I'll keep it in mind.  <span style="border: 1px solid green;"><font style="background: green" face="Arial" color="#FFFFFF">[[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]]</font></span> 20:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

539161 +++$+++ 5ko +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-09 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.171052460E09 +++$+++ \u0410\u043a\u043e \u0442\u0438 \u0438\u043c\u0430\u0448 \u043f\u043e-[[WP:RS|\u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0442\u043d\u0438 \u0438\u0437\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0438]], \u043a\u043e\u0438\u0442\u043e \u0438\u0437\u043f\u043e\u043b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0442 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e \u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \"Aleksi\", \u043c\u043e\u043b\u044f \u0442\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0433\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0448. \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438, -- +++$+++ Ако ти имаш по-[[WP:RS|авторитетни източници]], които използват само транслитерацията "Aleksi", моля те да ги посочиш. Поздрави, --[[User:5ko|5ko]] 12:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
539162 +++$+++ Anonimu +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539161 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.171137480E09 +++$+++ Yeah, \"very different names\" like \"Tulcha\" instead of \"Tulcea\", or \"Harsovo\" instead of Harsova. And BTW, \"Diiu\" is an old romanian name for Vidin. Vidin is also there so that readers don't think that Diiu is the only name for the city used in Romania. But maybe this could be changed to \"obsolete Romanian name: Diiu\" or something. As for Caliacra and \u015eabla: if someone read in a book written before 1940 about \"Caliacra\", and wanted to search it in wiki, he wouldn't find it. But if the romanian rendition would be presentin the article, the search engine would find the \"Kaliakra\" article. +++$+++ :: Yeah, "very different names" like "Tulcha" instead of "Tulcea", or "Harsovo" instead of Harsova. And BTW, "Diiu" is an old romanian name for Vidin. Vidin is also there so that readers don't think that Diiu is the only name for the city used in Romania. But maybe this could be changed to "obsolete Romanian name: Diiu" or something. As for Caliacra and Şabla: if someone read in a book written before 1940 about "Caliacra", and wanted to search it in wiki, he wouldn't find it. But if the romanian rendition would be presentin the article, the search engine would find the "Kaliakra" article.[[User:Anonimu|Anonimu]] 11:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
539163 +++$+++ Anonimu +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539161 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.171140060E09 +++$+++ Using \"ch\" instead of \"ce\" is like using \"\u015f\" instead of \"sh\". It's just the final \"o\". ( \"harsovo\" is not standard transliteration, so the \"a\" isn't really an a, but a sound pretty close to  romanian \"\xee\/\xe2\") +++$+++ ::: Using "ch" instead of "ce" is like using "ş" instead of "sh". It's just the final "o". ( "harsovo" is not standard transliteration, so the "a" isn't really an a, but a sound pretty close to  romanian "î/â")[[User:Anonimu|Anonimu]] 12:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
539164 +++$+++ Anonimu +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539161 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.171144260E09 +++$+++ About Harsova, here's what i could find: \"H\xc2RSOVO - grad v Severna Dobrudja, na lebiya bryag na r. Dunav, dnes v Rum\xe2nya. P\xe2rvoto sigurno slomenavane na toyi grad e v geografska karta ot 1507 g. Spored ocmanski dokument ot 16 vek e vilaet, prinadlejasht k\xe2m Silistrenski sandjak.  '''Priema se, che imeto mu proizliza ot \"lichnoto ime H\xe2rs ili Hr\xe2s'''\". \"(sorry for the lame transliteration, but it took to long to write in cyrillic)Unfortunately this doesn't say the exact first mention. Romanian linguist Sorin Olteanu also thinks it comes from \"H\xe2rs\"\/\"H\xe2r\u015f\"(someone's name)+ ova (turkish for \"field\").  +++$+++ :::About Harsova, here's what i could find: "HÂRSOVO - grad v Severna Dobrudja, na lebiya bryag na r. Dunav, dnes v Rumânya. Pârvoto sigurno slomenavane na toyi grad e v geografska karta ot 1507 g. Spored ocmanski dokument ot 16 vek e vilaet, prinadlejasht kâm Silistrenski sandjak.  '''Priema se, che imeto mu proizliza ot "lichnoto ime Hârs ili Hrâs'''". "(sorry for the lame transliteration, but it took to long to write in cyrillic)Unfortunately this doesn't say the exact first mention. Romanian linguist Sorin Olteanu also thinks it comes from "Hârs"/"Hârş"(someone's name)+ ova (turkish for "field"). [[User:Anonimu|Anonimu]] 13:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

14875 +++$+++ Sillyfolkboy +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311570780E09 +++$+++ Hi CeeGee. Excellent job on covering both the [[2011 European Mountain Running Championships]] and [[Ahmet Arslan]]! I've been meaning to write Arslan's article for a while \u2013 even though he is obscure, he is somewhat peerless in Europe. I hope you enjoyed seeing Turkish athletes compete so well in your home town. Take care!  +++$+++ Hi CeeGee. Excellent job on covering both the [[2011 European Mountain Running Championships]] and [[Ahmet Arslan]]! I've been meaning to write Arslan's article for a while – even though he is obscure, he is somewhat peerless in Europe. I hope you enjoyed seeing Turkish athletes compete so well in your home town. Take care! [[User talk:Sillyfolkboy|SFB]] 22:13, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
14876 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14875 +++$+++ 14875 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311601140E09 +++$+++ Hi [[User:Sillyfolkboy|SFB]]. Thanks a lot for the nice words. I've just noticed it in  a recent newspaper report, and was wondering that Wikipedia was lacking an article about him. Cheers!  +++$+++ :Hi [[User:Sillyfolkboy|SFB]]. Thanks a lot for the nice words. I've just noticed it in  a recent newspaper report, and was wondering that Wikipedia was lacking an article about him. Cheers! [[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee#top|talk]]) 06:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

14877 +++$+++ Kante4 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14877 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311717360E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for the article but for the handball, basketball and volleyball articles there are templates to make it look better and clearer, also you should add the standings for each groups.  +++$+++ Hey, thanks for the article but for the handball, basketball and volleyball articles there are templates to make it look better and clearer, also you should add the standings for each groups. [[User:Kante4|Kante4]] ([[User talk:Kante4|talk]]) 14:56, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
14878 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ 14877 +++$+++ 14877 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311731340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the hint. I will follow your advise. +++$+++ :Thanks for the hint. I will follow your advise.[[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee#top|talk]]) 18:49, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

277023 +++$+++ SimonP +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-31 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.149129720E09 +++$+++ Hello, I have reverted a few page moves you have made. The en-dash, em-dash distinction is an important one in Canadian riding names. An em-dash is used to separate the names of two cities or regions as in [[Ajax\u2014Pickering]]. A normal dash or en-dash indicates a multibarreled name for a francophone city, as in [[Saint-Lambert]]. For a riding name such as [[Charlesbourg\u2014Haute-Saint-Charles]] the different type of dashes are important as they indicate that the riding name mentions two rather than four communities. -  +++$+++ Hello, I have reverted a few page moves you have made. The en-dash, em-dash distinction is an important one in Canadian riding names. An em-dash is used to separate the names of two cities or regions as in [[Ajax—Pickering]]. A normal dash or en-dash indicates a multibarreled name for a francophone city, as in [[Saint-Lambert]]. For a riding name such as [[Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles]] the different type of dashes are important as they indicate that the riding name mentions two rather than four communities. - [[User:SimonP|SimonP]] 19:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
277024 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277023 +++$+++ 277023 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.149129780E09 +++$+++ Are you confusing a hyphen and an en-dash?  I'm changing to en-dashes, not hyphens, and I've done it to a ton of pages. An em-dash is for other purposes entirely. I think we'd better talk before any more moves are made either way. <span style=\"border: 1px solid #CC0000;\"> +++$+++ :Are you confusing a hyphen and an en-dash?  I'm changing to en-dashes, not hyphens, and I've done it to a ton of pages. An em-dash is for other purposes entirely. I think we'd better talk before any more moves are made either way. <span style="border: 1px solid #CC0000;">[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font style="background: #CC0000" face="Times" color="#FFFFFF">'''&nbsp;O<small>Z</small>L<small>AWYER</small>&nbsp;'''</font>]][[User talk:Osgoodelawyer|<font style="background:#FFFFFF" face="Arial" color="#000000">'''&nbsp;talk&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> 19:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
277025 +++$+++ SimonP +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277023 +++$+++ 277024 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.149130020E09 +++$+++ The best place to discuss this would be at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Electoral districts in Canada]], though others have debated this issue in the past and the general consensus supports the status quo. -  +++$+++ ::The best place to discuss this would be at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Electoral districts in Canada]], though others have debated this issue in the past and the general consensus supports the status quo. - [[User:SimonP|SimonP]] 19:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
277026 +++$+++ SimonP +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277023 +++$+++ 277025 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.149130560E09 +++$+++ For some background, the original discussion where the current naming convention was reached can be read at [[Talk:List of Canadian federal electoral districts]] -  +++$+++ :::For some background, the original discussion where the current naming convention was reached can be read at [[Talk:List of Canadian federal electoral districts]] - [[User:SimonP|SimonP]] 19:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
277027 +++$+++ SimonP +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277023 +++$+++ 277026 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.149130980E09 +++$+++ No trouble, I'm sorry that you spent a bunch of time and effort on something that was reverted. -  +++$+++ ::::No trouble, I'm sorry that you spent a bunch of time and effort on something that was reverted. - [[User:SimonP|SimonP]] 20:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

274189 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274189 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-17 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.192687020E09 +++$+++ Hello Sarah, I've responded to your E-mail! After being away for four days, I've had a bunch of people to respond to!  +++$+++ Hello Sarah, I've responded to your E-mail! After being away for four days, I've had a bunch of people to respond to! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 22:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
274190 +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274189 +++$+++ 274189 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.192761480E09 +++$+++ Thanks Acalamari. I was wondering who that fellow was for a minute or two! Anyway, glad to see you back on deck. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks Acalamari. I was wondering who that fellow was for a minute or two! Anyway, glad to see you back on deck. :) Cheers, [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 19:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
274191 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sarah +++$+++ 274189 +++$+++ 274190 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.192774800E09 +++$+++ Glad you recognized my E-mail though. :) At least you'll know in future. :) I'll respond again soon.  +++$+++ ::Glad you recognized my E-mail though. :) At least you'll know in future. :) I'll respond again soon. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 23:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

559154 +++$+++ Kurykh +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 559154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-29 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.183115460E09 +++$+++ Just asking, but what is meant by the geographical coordinates on your user page? \u2014''' +++$+++ Just asking, but what is meant by the geographical coordinates on your user page? —'''[[User:Kurykh|<font color="#0000C0" face="cursive">Kurykh</font>]]''' 04:11, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
559155 +++$+++ Jeeny +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 559154 +++$+++ 559154 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.183118580E09 +++$+++ I can answer that. It's the middle of the ocean, because [[Coelacanth]] is an old fish once thought to be extinct.  +++$+++ :I can answer that. It's the middle of the ocean, because [[Coelacanth]] is an old fish once thought to be extinct. [[User:Jeeny|- Jeeny]]&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Jeeny|Talk]]</sup></small> 05:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
559156 +++$+++ Kurykh +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 559154 +++$+++ 559155 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.183120980E09 +++$+++ Um, ok. But coelacanths are not found in the middle of the South Pacific. But I'm just being anal about it... \u2014''' +++$+++ ::Um, ok. But coelacanths are not found in the middle of the South Pacific. But I'm just being anal about it... —'''[[User:Kurykh|<font color="#0000C0" face="cursive">Kurykh</font>]]''' 05:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
559157 +++$+++ Jeeny +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 559154 +++$+++ 559156 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 06:14:00 +++$+++ 1.183122840E09 +++$+++ LOL. I can relate! I think Coelacan likes to be mysterious, and probably wishes to be in the South Pacific. :)  +++$+++ :::LOL. I can relate! I think Coelacan likes to be mysterious, and probably wishes to be in the South Pacific. :) [[User:Jeeny|- Jeeny]]&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Jeeny|Talk]]</sup></small> 06:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

539172 +++$+++ Mentatus +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539172 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.171847400E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438, Todor. You've recently changed the name of the town in the [[Fl\u0103m\xe2nda Offensive]] article from [[Ryahovo]] to [[Oryahovo]]. I think it's wrong, since Oryahovo is just across Bechet, and Fl\u0103m\xe2nda (now called Puieni, Prundu commune) is locaed in [[Giurgiu County]]. The name of the Bulgarian town on the historical map I have was called \"Ryahovo\", it may have changed meanwhile. As far as I could see on an actual map, it must be close to Slivo Pole, Ruse Province. Maybe you can find the actual name. Cheers,  +++$+++ Здрасти, Todor. You've recently changed the name of the town in the [[Flămânda Offensive]] article from [[Ryahovo]] to [[Oryahovo]]. I think it's wrong, since Oryahovo is just across Bechet, and Flămânda (now called Puieni, Prundu commune) is locaed in [[Giurgiu County]]. The name of the Bulgarian town on the historical map I have was called "Ryahovo", it may have changed meanwhile. As far as I could see on an actual map, it must be close to Slivo Pole, Ruse Province. Maybe you can find the actual name. Cheers, [[User:Mentatus|Mentatus]] 17:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
539173 +++$+++ Mentatus +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539172 +++$+++ 539172 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.171860900E09 +++$+++ No prob. I'll change it back then.  +++$+++ :No prob. I'll change it back then. [[User:Mentatus|Mentatus]] 20:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

277030 +++$+++ Electionworld +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-03 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.149390240E09 +++$+++ I added [[Serbia]] and [[Montenegro]], but am now doubting about successor or succesor. We were editing at the same time, I didn't intend to conflict with you. [[User:Electionworld|Electionworld]] =  +++$+++ I added [[Serbia]] and [[Montenegro]], but am now doubting about successor or succesor. We were editing at the same time, I didn't intend to conflict with you. [[User:Electionworld|Electionworld]] = [[User:Wilfried Derksen|Wilfried]] <small>([[User talk:Electionworld|talk]]</small> 20:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
277031 +++$+++ Ran +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277030 +++$+++ 277030 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.149395700E09 +++$+++ Article 60 of the [http:\/\/www.carleton.ca\/cfsee\/cons.pdf Constitutional Charter of SCG] (pdf) deals with succession. --  +++$+++ :Article 60 of the [http://www.carleton.ca/cfsee/cons.pdf Constitutional Charter of SCG] (pdf) deals with succession. -- [[User:Ran|ran]] ([[User talk:Ran|talk]]) 21:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

539176 +++$+++ Evlekis +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539176 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-21 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.172117100E09 +++$+++ I just wanted your advice before I go ahead and start something. If you look at the [[Croatians]] page, it gives a list fo the countries which they inhabit, and the link takes you to an article about the Croats of that particular country: eg.Romania or Macedonia. On the page for ethnic [[Bulgarians]] (where I see you have contributed), the blue links on the countries simply direct one to the country itself. Do you think that it may be a good long-term idea to change those links to, for example, ''Bulgarians from'' such and such a country? I mean there is a lot which can be said for all of them: when they arrived, are they present settlers like in Spain and the USA? Are they traditionally allined to Bulgaria but locked out, such as those in the [[Western Outlands]]? Or are they mostly those who left Bulgaria some centuries back, like the Bessarabians of Moldova? Or might they have later adopted a Bulgarian identity from having settled in their present homelands since leaving a region currently in Bulgaria, but having done this before the nationalism revivals of the 18th century? (I can't think of a positive example for the last, but it is plausible as is the case with other nationals). A start may give good scope for future editing, do you think it's a good idea?  +++$+++ I just wanted your advice before I go ahead and start something. If you look at the [[Croatians]] page, it gives a list fo the countries which they inhabit, and the link takes you to an article about the Croats of that particular country: eg.Romania or Macedonia. On the page for ethnic [[Bulgarians]] (where I see you have contributed), the blue links on the countries simply direct one to the country itself. Do you think that it may be a good long-term idea to change those links to, for example, ''Bulgarians from'' such and such a country? I mean there is a lot which can be said for all of them: when they arrived, are they present settlers like in Spain and the USA? Are they traditionally allined to Bulgaria but locked out, such as those in the [[Western Outlands]]? Or are they mostly those who left Bulgaria some centuries back, like the Bessarabians of Moldova? Or might they have later adopted a Bulgarian identity from having settled in their present homelands since leaving a region currently in Bulgaria, but having done this before the nationalism revivals of the 18th century? (I can't think of a positive example for the last, but it is plausible as is the case with other nationals). A start may give good scope for future editing, do you think it's a good idea? [[User:Evlekis|Evlekis]] 20:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
539177 +++$+++ Evlekis +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539176 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.172120820E09 +++$+++ Thanks Todor. I feel that if we write a little something about the Bulgarians of each country bit by bit, then it may make the article long and painful for the eyes, constantly introducing something new. But then, if there is little to say about the Bulgarians of some countries then this may be a good idea. You know how it is with ethnic groups living outside of their national states: they may have a desire from greater autonomy, there may be human rights issues concerned etc. But there is time, we'll get round to everything eventually. For the time being, these links you mentioned about the Bulgarians abroad as opposed to Croatia's template, any chance of being able to see them? Is there a link to this, or is it simply not ready yet?  +++$+++ ::Thanks Todor. I feel that if we write a little something about the Bulgarians of each country bit by bit, then it may make the article long and painful for the eyes, constantly introducing something new. But then, if there is little to say about the Bulgarians of some countries then this may be a good idea. You know how it is with ethnic groups living outside of their national states: they may have a desire from greater autonomy, there may be human rights issues concerned etc. But there is time, we'll get round to everything eventually. For the time being, these links you mentioned about the Bulgarians abroad as opposed to Croatia's template, any chance of being able to see them? Is there a link to this, or is it simply not ready yet? [[User:Evlekis|Evlekis]] 21:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

14890 +++$+++ Bettia +++$+++ Tangerines +++$+++ 14890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-15 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.271352900E09 +++$+++ <div class=\"floatleft\" style=\"margin-bottom:0\">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]<\/div>I have nominated [[2007\u201308 Lancashire FA Challenge Trophy]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/2007\u201308 Lancashire FA Challenge Trophy]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> <span style=\"font-family: Segoe Print, sans-serif;text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.4em\"> +++$+++ <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[2007–08 Lancashire FA Challenge Trophy]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007–08 Lancashire FA Challenge Trophy]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> <span style="font-family: Segoe Print, sans-serif;text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.4em">[[User:Bettia|<span style="color: green;">Bettia</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Bettia|<small>(talk)</small>]]</span> 10:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
14891 +++$+++ Bettia +++$+++ Tangerines +++$+++ 14890 +++$+++ 14890 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.271353920E09 +++$+++ [[2008\u201309 Lancashire FA Challenge Trophy]] has also been listed as part of this AfD. <span style=\"font-family: Segoe Print, sans-serif;text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.4em\"> +++$+++ :[[2008–09 Lancashire FA Challenge Trophy]] has also been listed as part of this AfD. <span style="font-family: Segoe Print, sans-serif;text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.4em">[[User:Bettia|<span style="color: green;">Bettia</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Bettia|<small>(talk)</small>]]</span> 10:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

89863 +++$+++ Gate1998 +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ 89863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.204764600E09 +++$+++ Great! It will probably be a little while, but I will definitely be adding some info.  +++$+++ Great! It will probably be a little while, but I will definitely be adding some info. [[User:Gate1998|Gate1998]] ([[User talk:Gate1998|talk]]) 16:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
89864 +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ 89863 +++$+++ 89863 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.204765380E09 +++$+++ it's my pleasure. thanks. -- +++$+++ :it's my pleasure. thanks. --[[User:Melly42|Melly42]] ([[User talk:Melly42#top|talk]]) 17:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

277036 +++$+++ HJKeats +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277036 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-09 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.149898740E09 +++$+++ Certainly, where do I sign up. There seems to be a number of us with NL interests to make it a good project.  Count me in.  +++$+++ Certainly, where do I sign up. There seems to be a number of us with NL interests to make it a good project.  Count me in. [[User:HJKeats|HJKeats]] 17:19, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
277037 +++$+++ HJKeats +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277036 +++$+++ 277036 +++$+++ 2006-06-09 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.149899460E09 +++$+++ If I dropped names of NL Wikipedia users on you, would like to field the questions and the requests to become part of the project?  +++$+++ :If I dropped names of NL Wikipedia users on you, would like to field the questions and the requests to become part of the project? [[User:HJKeats|HJKeats]] 17:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

539181 +++$+++ Contributor175 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-03 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.172935740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Contributor175|Contributor175]] 07:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
539182 +++$+++ Contributor175 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539181 +++$+++ 539181 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.173014100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Contributor175|Contributor175]] 05:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

14894 +++$+++ Phantomsteve +++$+++ Tangerines +++$+++ 14894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-24 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.282703220E09 +++$+++ As he has played (Sky Sports reported at 3 mins after kick off: \"Direct free kick taken right-footed by Mark Halstead (Blackpool) from own half, resulting in open play.\") I have restored the article, and added a brief mention about this first game. If you can find a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] which mentions it (you'll probably need to find it after the game is completed), then that can be added to [[WP:V|verify]] the information -- ''''' +++$+++ As he has played (Sky Sports reported at 3 mins after kick off: "Direct free kick taken right-footed by Mark Halstead (Blackpool) from own half, resulting in open play.") I have restored the article, and added a brief mention about this first game. If you can find a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] which mentions it (you'll probably need to find it after the game is completed), then that can be added to [[WP:V|verify]] the information -- '''''[[User:Phantomsteve|<font color="#307D7E">Phantom</font><font color="#55CAFA">Steve</font>]]'''''/[[User talk:Phantomsteve|<font color="#008000">talk</font>]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Phantomsteve|<font color="#000080">contribs</font>]]\ 19:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
14895 +++$+++ Tangerines +++$+++ Tangerines +++$+++ 14894 +++$+++ 14894 +++$+++ 2010-08-24 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.282703340E09 +++$+++ Thank you and don't worry I update all the Blackpool players anyway after each game so I know what to do and to do it after the game! Thanks for your help!-- +++$+++ :Thank you and don't worry I update all the Blackpool players anyway after each game so I know what to do and to do it after the game! Thanks for your help!--[[User:Tangerines|<font color="darkorange">'''''♦Tangerines♦'''''</font>]]·<small>[[User_talk:Tangerines|Talk]]</small> 19:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
14896 +++$+++ Phantomsteve +++$+++ Tangerines +++$+++ 14894 +++$+++ 14895 +++$+++ 2010-08-24 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.282703520E09 +++$+++ I've actually added both the reference, and a link to BBC Sport's player profile for him! It's over to you now (I'm not a great footy fan!) -- ''''' +++$+++ ::I've actually added both the reference, and a link to BBC Sport's player profile for him! It's over to you now (I'm not a great footy fan!) -- '''''[[User:Phantomsteve|<font color="#307D7E">Phantom</font><font color="#55CAFA">Steve</font>]]'''''/[[User talk:Phantomsteve|<font color="#008000">talk</font>]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Phantomsteve|<font color="#000080">contribs</font>]]\ 19:32, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

539183 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-04 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.173042420E09 +++$+++ \u0421\u0438\u0433\u0443\u0440\u0435\u043d \u0441\u044a\u043c, \u0447\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u0421\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043e\u043d \u0449\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0435 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0445\u0443\u0431\u0430\u0432\u0430 : ) -- +++$+++ Сигурен съм, че статията за Симеон ще стане много хубава : ) --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 13:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
539184 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539183 +++$+++ 539183 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.173042900E09 +++$+++ \u0410, \u0432\u0438\u0434\u044f\u0445 \u0433\u043e \u0432 \u0435\u0434\u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043d\u0438\u0433\u0430: \u0424\u0443\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u043b\u0435\u0442\u043e\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438. -- +++$+++ :А, видях го в една книга: Фуденски летописи. --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 13:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

539186 +++$+++ Cameltrader +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.173583140E09 +++$+++ Of course, I'd be glad to help. Two quick questions: should we display George Sursuvul? and do you already have an idea how to visualize the unknown daughters by the undetermined marriage? -- +++$+++ Of course, I'd be glad to help. Two quick questions: should we display George Sursuvul? and do you already have an idea how to visualize the unknown daughters by the undetermined marriage? --[[User:Cameltrader|Cameltrader]] 19:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
539187 +++$+++ Cameltrader +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539186 +++$+++ 539186 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.173589080E09 +++$+++ Try [[User:Cameltrader\/Simeon_the_Great_(family_tree)|this]] &mdash; it got rather lengthy, unfortunately. Don't forget to test in Internet Explorer. If you need any adjustments, I will be online tomorrow morning. -- +++$+++ :Try [[User:Cameltrader/Simeon_the_Great_(family_tree)|this]] &mdash; it got rather lengthy, unfortunately. Don't forget to test in Internet Explorer. If you need any adjustments, I will be online tomorrow morning. --[[User:Cameltrader|Cameltrader]] 20:58, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
539188 +++$+++ Cameltrader +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539186 +++$+++ 539187 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.173630360E09 +++$+++ I made [[User:Cameltrader\/Simeon_the_Great_(family_tree)#Using tables|another attempt]]. My second example there is just a test \u2014 it uses [[:Template:Familytree|a clever template]] with nice and easy syntax, immitating ASCII art. The only drawback is that it doesn't make table cell equal width (this can be solved), and I couldn't get wife numbers appear near the children. It may also be an unnecessary burden to the servers, since it makes massive use of templates. -- +++$+++ ::I made [[User:Cameltrader/Simeon_the_Great_(family_tree)#Using tables|another attempt]]. My second example there is just a test — it uses [[:Template:Familytree|a clever template]] with nice and easy syntax, immitating ASCII art. The only drawback is that it doesn't make table cell equal width (this can be solved), and I couldn't get wife numbers appear near the children. It may also be an unnecessary burden to the servers, since it makes massive use of templates. --[[User:Cameltrader|Cameltrader]] 09:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
539189 +++$+++ Cameltrader +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539186 +++$+++ 539188 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.173632880E09 +++$+++ I was hesitating whether to move the children to the right, or just swap Peter and Ivan. Clumsily,  I did both :) Unless the order of children is significant, they should be ok now. -- +++$+++ :::I was hesitating whether to move the children to the right, or just swap Peter and Ivan. Clumsily,  I did both :) Unless the order of children is significant, they should be ok now. --[[User:Cameltrader|Cameltrader]] 10:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
539190 +++$+++ Cameltrader +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539186 +++$+++ 539189 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.173840540E09 +++$+++ I couldn't realize how User:Imladjov is related to this (his last contribution is half a year old), but hopefully I've sorted the siblings correctly. -- +++$+++ ::::I couldn't realize how User:Imladjov is related to this (his last contribution is half a year old), but hopefully I've sorted the siblings correctly. --[[User:Cameltrader|Cameltrader]] 19:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

14899 +++$+++ Crosstemplejay +++$+++ Ashley Y +++$+++ 14899 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-20 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.303336560E09 +++$+++ Hi Ashley Y, I have mistakenly changed you picture for your userbox, unfortunately I cannot remember the exact picture name. This happened because I was trying to edit your userbox to make one for myself. I'm very sorry. Hope you can reverse the mistake. +++$+++ Hi Ashley Y, I have mistakenly changed you picture for your userbox, unfortunately I cannot remember the exact picture name. This happened because I was trying to edit your userbox to make one for myself. I'm very sorry. Hope you can reverse the mistake.[[User:Crosstemplejay|CrossTempleJay]] ([[User talk:Crosstemplejay|talk]]) 14:56, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
14900 +++$+++ Ashley Y +++$+++ Ashley Y +++$+++ 14899 +++$+++ 14899 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.303568400E09 +++$+++ I reverted it. Actually, you could have reverted it. &mdash; +++$+++ :I reverted it. Actually, you could have reverted it. &mdash;[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 07:20, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

14901 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14901 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-10 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.260508560E09 +++$+++ I just created [[Kentucky Route 30]] and put in a source. Only problem is that even though the link DOES work, when you click on it it says the page can't be found which isn't true. What's wrong with it? - +++$+++ I just created [[Kentucky Route 30]] and put in a source. Only problem is that even though the link DOES work, when you click on it it says the page can't be found which isn't true. What's wrong with it? -[[user:WarthogDemon|<font color="007FFF" face="Arial">'''Warthog'''</font>]][[User_talk:WarthogDemon|<font color="2A52BE" face="Arial">'''Demon'''</font>]] 21:16, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
14902 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14901 +++$+++ 14901 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.260509040E09 +++$+++ Nevermind. I just figured it out. Sorry for the bother. Happy Editing. :) - +++$+++ :Nevermind. I just figured it out. Sorry for the bother. Happy Editing. :) -[[user:WarthogDemon|<font color="007FFF" face="Arial">'''Warthog'''</font>]][[User_talk:WarthogDemon|<font color="2A52BE" face="Arial">'''Demon'''</font>]] 21:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
14903 +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14901 +++$+++ 14901 +++$+++ 2009-12-11 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.260563700E09 +++$+++ I am not an administrator.  You have the same abilities to revert these edits, issue [[Wikipedia:Template messages\/User talk namespace|warnings]], and [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism|request administrator action against vandalism]] that I do.  +++$+++ :I am not an administrator.  You have the same abilities to revert these edits, issue [[Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace|warnings]], and [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism|request administrator action against vandalism]] that I do. [[User:North Shoreman|Tom (North Shoreman)]] ([[User talk:North Shoreman#top|talk]]) 12:35, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

277046 +++$+++ SeraphimXI +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-21 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.150938780E09 +++$+++ To me it's both extremely biased, and highly offencive to call the holocost camp killings murders.  Imagine if 20 years in the future someone looks at the current US death penalty and starts saying that all those people were \"murdered\" by the goverment. It's the same exact idea, only on a much grander scale. <font color=\"FF3399\"> +++$+++ To me it's both extremely biased, and highly offencive to call the holocost camp killings murders.  Imagine if 20 years in the future someone looks at the current US death penalty and starts saying that all those people were "murdered" by the goverment. It's the same exact idea, only on a much grander scale. <font color="FF3399">[[User:SeraphimXI|Seraphim]]</font> 18:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
277047 +++$+++ SeraphimXI +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277046 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.150940280E09 +++$+++ I'm not telling you what to do as far as dispute tags go, i'm merely stating wikipedia policy.  There is an active dispute about the pov-ness of the section therefore a tag is 100% appropriate.  If you want, go post on the policy pump about changing how dispute tags work, that's outside of the scope of this discussion.  The debate on the legality of the nazi regime is irrelevant, they abused the system to get into power, everyone knows that, however they did manage to attain power, and hitler was the legal dictator.  I love how you are basing your argument on the statement \"In addition, there is higher law--not just international law, but unwritten constitutional and other law that any modern nation must adhere to in some manner.\" if a so called \"law\" is unwritten, guess what, it's not a law.  Also you say \"Finally, one who orders a killing but who does not carry out that killing himself is, in very many jurisdictions, charged with murder.\", that is very true, however that's talking about a person acting on his own, not a goverment. <font color=\"FF3399\"> +++$+++ ::I'm not telling you what to do as far as dispute tags go, i'm merely stating wikipedia policy.  There is an active dispute about the pov-ness of the section therefore a tag is 100% appropriate.  If you want, go post on the policy pump about changing how dispute tags work, that's outside of the scope of this discussion.  The debate on the legality of the nazi regime is irrelevant, they abused the system to get into power, everyone knows that, however they did manage to attain power, and hitler was the legal dictator.  I love how you are basing your argument on the statement "In addition, there is higher law--not just international law, but unwritten constitutional and other law that any modern nation must adhere to in some manner." if a so called "law" is unwritten, guess what, it's not a law.  Also you say "Finally, one who orders a killing but who does not carry out that killing himself is, in very many jurisdictions, charged with murder.", that is very true, however that's talking about a person acting on his own, not a goverment. <font color="FF3399">[[User:SeraphimXI|Seraphim]]</font> 18:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

539191 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539191 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.173633840E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0439! \u0410\u0437 \u0431\u044f\u0445 \u0432 \u0431\u0438\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043e\u0442\u0435\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0430\u0445 \u043d\u044f\u043a\u043e\u0438 \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0438 \u0432 \u043a\u043d\u0438\u0433\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0417\u043b\u0430\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u0438, \u043e\u0431\u0430\u0447\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u0433\u0443\u0431\u0438\u0445 \u043b\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043a\u044a\u0434\u0435\u0442\u043e \u0441\u044a\u043c \u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043b (\u0434\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0433\u043e \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u044f). \u0417\u0430 \u0431\u0438\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0441 \u043c\u0430\u0434\u0436\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0435, \u043d\u0435 \u0431\u044f\u0445\u0430 \u0441\u043f\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0438 \u0424\u0443\u043b\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043b\u0435\u0442\u043e\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438, \u044f\u0432\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u0435 \u0431\u0438\u043b \u0441\u044a\u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0447\u0435\u043d \u0433\u043b\u0430\u0432\u043d\u043e \u0432\u044a\u0440\u0445\u0443 \u043e\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0441 \u0432\u0438\u0437\u0430\u043d\u0442\u0438\u044f, \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043f\u043e\u043b\u0430\u0433\u0430\u043c. \u0418\u043c\u0430\u0448\u0435 \u0437\u0430 \u043d\u0435\u044f \u0432\u0438\u0437. \u0438\u0437\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0438, \u043d\u043e \u0432 \u0442\u044f\u0445 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043e\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u0442\u043e \u0438 \u0437\u0430\u0433\u0443\u0431\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u044f\u043c\u0430\u0448\u0435, \u0437\u0430 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430 \u043e\u0442 \u043d\u0435\u043c\u0441\u043a\u0438\u044f \u043b\u0435\u0442\u043e\u043f\u0438\u0441. \u0414\u043e\u0440\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f \u0437\u0430 \u0422\u0435\u043e\u0434\u043e\u0440 \u0421\u0438\u0433\u0440\u0438\u0446\u0430, \u041c\u0430\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0438\u0441 \u0438 \u0431\u0438\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u041f\u0438\u0433\u0438, \u043d\u043e \u0441\u0435\u0433\u0430 \u043d\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0448\u0430 \u043d\u0438\u0449\u043e... \u0410\u0437 \u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e \u0433\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043c \u0441\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043b \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044a\u0447\u043d\u043e \u0438\u0437\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0438, \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0430 \u0447\u0435 \u043d\u0435 \u0431\u044f\u0445 \u0442\u044a\u0440\u0441\u0438\u043b \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0438\u0432\u0430, \u043f\u044a\u043a \u0438 \u0432 \u043a\u043d\u0438\u0433\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u0445\u0430 \u0433\u043b\u0430\u0432\u043d\u043e \u0421\u043a\u0438\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0430, \u041a\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0442\u0438\u043d \u0411\u0430\u0433\u0440\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043d\u0438, \u041b\u044a\u0432 \u0414\u044f\u043a\u043e\u043d \u0438 \u043e\u0449\u0435 \u0434\u0432\u0430\u043c\u0430. -- +++$+++ Здравей! Аз бях в библиотеката и погледнах някои работи в книгата на Златарски, обаче загубих листа, където съм писал (дано го намеря). За битката с маджарите, не бяха споменати Фулденските летописи, явно автора е бил съсредоточен главно върху отношенията с византия, предполагам. Имаше за нея виз. източници, но в тях данни за местоположението и загубите нямаше, за разлика от немския летопис. Дори намерих информация за Теодор Сигрица, Мармаис и битката при Пиги, но сега не мога да напиша нищо... Аз като гледам си намерил предостатъчно източници, така че не бях търсил такива, пък и в книгата се ползваха главно Скилица, Константин Багренородни, Лъв Дякон и още двама. --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 10:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
539192 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539191 +++$+++ 539191 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.173721380E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438! \u0417\u043d\u0430\u0447\u0438 \u0432 \u0435\u0434\u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043d\u0438\u0433\u0430, \"1300 \u0433\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043d\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0430\" \u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043d \u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0446\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0442: \"\u0418 \u0434\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438 \u0441\u0435 \u0441\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u043e\u0436\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0447\u0435\u043d\u043e. \u0423 \u0431\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0435, \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u0438\u0442\u043e \u0441\u0435 \u043f\u0430\u0434\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0431\u0435\u0434\u0430\u0442\u0430, \u0431\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0438 \u0443\u0431\u0438\u0442\u0438 20,000 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0438.\" \u0412 \u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u043d\u0435\u0442 \u043d\u0435\u0449\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0438\u0448\u0435, \u0437\u0430\u0449\u043e\u0442\u043e \u0438\u0441\u043a\u0430\u0442 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0438 \u0433\u043e \u043a\u0443\u043f\u0438\u0448, \u0430 \u0432 \u0431\u0438\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043e\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u0437\u0430\u043b\u0430\u0433\u0430\u043c, \u0447\u0435 \u043d\u044f\u043c\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0433\u043e \u0438\u043c\u0430, \u0442\u044a\u0439 \u0447\u0435 \u0442\u0440\u044f\u0431\u0432\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u0434\u043e\u0432\u043e\u043b\u0438\u043c \u0441 \u0442\u043e\u0437\u0438 \u0446\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0442. \u0422\u044a\u0439 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0438\u043d\u0430\u0447\u0435, \u0434\u043d\u0435\u0441 \u0449\u0435 \u0442\u0440\u044f\u0431\u0432\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0438\u0434\u0430 \u0442\u0430\u043c \u0438 \u0449\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u043f\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043c, \u043d\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u0445\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0437\u043d\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0438... \u0421\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u0421\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043e\u043d \u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0432\u044a\u0437\u0445\u043e\u0434\u043d\u0430 : ) \u0418\u043c\u0430 \u043b\u0438 \u043e\u0449\u0435 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u043d\u043a\u0438 \u043e\u0442 \u0421\u043a\u0438\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0430? \u0417\u0430\u0449\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u044f \u043a\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0438\u0434\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0440\u0430\u0448 \u0437\u0430 \u0438\u0437\u0431\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0430? -- +++$+++ :Здрасти! Значи в една книга, "1300 години на стража" е поместен следния цитат: "И двете страни се сражавали ожесточено. У българите, на които се паднала победата, били намерени убити 20,000 конници." В интернет нещо не пише, защото искат да си го купиш, а в библиотиката се обзалагам, че няма да го има, тъй че трябва да се задоволим с този цитат. Тъй или иначе, днес ще трябва да ида там и ще попитам, но не храни напразни надежди... Статията за Симеон е станала превъзходна : ) Има ли още картинки от Скилица? Защо не я кандидатираш за избрана страница? --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 10:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

277048 +++$+++  +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Governments, like corporations, can be considered \"people\" in the legal sense. This is a collateral issue, though, since by the \"Nazis\" we're speaking of the individuals who ran the regime, and when we say \"murdered\" we mean \"by those who gave the orders.\" OzLawyer 19:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ Governments, like corporations, can be considered "people" in the legal sense. This is a collateral issue, though, since by the "Nazis" we're speaking of the individuals who ran the regime, and when we say "murdered" we mean "by those who gave the orders." OzLawyer 19:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
277049 +++$+++ SeraphimXI +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277048 +++$+++ 277048 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.150943160E09 +++$+++ Corporations are able to be considered people in the legal sense, that is true, however that is not the case with goverments.  <font color=\"FF3399\"> +++$+++ : Corporations are able to be considered people in the legal sense, that is true, however that is not the case with goverments.  <font color="FF3399">[[User:SeraphimXI|Seraphim]]</font> 19:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
277050 +++$+++  +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277048 +++$+++ 277049 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Now, how about addressing the fact that we are obviously speaking of those people who gave the orders for the killings when we're referring to \"murder\"? OzLawyer 19:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ ::Now, how about addressing the fact that we are obviously speaking of those people who gave the orders for the killings when we're referring to "murder"? OzLawyer 19:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
277051 +++$+++ SeraphimXI +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277048 +++$+++ 277050 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.150944420E09 +++$+++ They did it through legal channels, it was not murder.  There is really no wiggle room here, murder is illegal, executions are legal.  The post-war trials did not convict any of the executioners of wrongdoing.  That shows that they were executions, not murders. <font color=\"FF3399\"> +++$+++ :::They did it through legal channels, it was not murder.  There is really no wiggle room here, murder is illegal, executions are legal.  The post-war trials did not convict any of the executioners of wrongdoing.  That shows that they were executions, not murders. <font color="FF3399">[[User:SeraphimXI|Seraphim]]</font> 19:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

14908 +++$+++ BusterD +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-16 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.266385740E09 +++$+++ Would you consider putting your name in the hat for Military History project coordinator during the March election cycle? I'm going to nominate myself, not because I'm especially qualified, but because us ACW folks have been keeping a low profile for too long. You're on the shortlist of ACW people I think would be suitable. Plus it would be more fun WITH you. I've even asked Hal, but I suspect he'll shy away, like I usually do.  +++$+++ Would you consider putting your name in the hat for Military History project coordinator during the March election cycle? I'm going to nominate myself, not because I'm especially qualified, but because us ACW folks have been keeping a low profile for too long. You're on the shortlist of ACW people I think would be suitable. Plus it would be more fun WITH you. I've even asked Hal, but I suspect he'll shy away, like I usually do. [[User:BusterD|BusterD]] ([[User talk:BusterD|talk]]) 21:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
14909 +++$+++ BusterD +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14908 +++$+++ 14908 +++$+++ 2010-02-16 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.266393000E09 +++$+++ I hope you didn't consider my solicitation to be any form of advertising for my own pending offer. I just know editors I regard as reliably sensible and trustworthy. You're that guy. All the best.  +++$+++ :I hope you didn't consider my solicitation to be any form of advertising for my own pending offer. I just know editors I regard as reliably sensible and trustworthy. You're that guy. All the best. [[User:BusterD|BusterD]] ([[User talk:BusterD|talk]]) 23:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

614154 +++$+++ Mathezar +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-05 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.267838880E09 +++$+++ My hunch is that you probably know that the quote is accurate and you are just doing whatever you can to suppress it.  +++$+++ My hunch is that you probably know that the quote is accurate and you are just doing whatever you can to suppress it. [[User:Mathezar|Mathezar]] ([[User talk:Mathezar|talk]]) 17:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
614155 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614154 +++$+++ 614154 +++$+++ 2010-03-05 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.267839900E09 +++$+++ I'd rather you didn't ask personal questions, I value a reasonable amount of privacy. Your hunches are offtopic and irrelevant, see [[WP:V|verifiability policy]]. . .   +++$+++ :I'd rather you didn't ask personal questions, I value a reasonable amount of privacy. Your hunches are offtopic and irrelevant, see [[WP:V|verifiability policy]]. . .  [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:45, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
614156 +++$+++ Mathezar +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614154 +++$+++ 614155 +++$+++ 2010-03-05 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.267840500E09 +++$+++ If you are unwilling to lay all your cards on the table that is fine I suppose. But, at least propose a scenario whereby the quote could be false. I am sure you won't be able to find a reliable source that states that the quote is false.  +++$+++ ::If you are unwilling to lay all your cards on the table that is fine I suppose. But, at least propose a scenario whereby the quote could be false. I am sure you won't be able to find a reliable source that states that the quote is false. [[User:Mathezar|Mathezar]] ([[User talk:Mathezar|talk]]) 17:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
614157 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614154 +++$+++ 614156 +++$+++ 2010-03-05 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.267841520E09 +++$+++ My beliefs are irrelevant, take it to the article talk page and I'll review it when time permits. All the best,  +++$+++ :::My beliefs are irrelevant, take it to the article talk page and I'll review it when time permits. All the best, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

277054 +++$+++ BL Lacertae +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-27 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.151392140E09 +++$+++ Hi. ive just taken fm-stub to [[Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion]]. it wasnt officially proposed or debated at [[WP:WSS\/P]], which is the way we make sure that stub template names arent ambiguous and couldnt relate to things like FM radio, and also where we make sure there are plenty of stubs existing before the template is made. in future please propose new stub types before making new ones! <small><i><font color=\"#990000\"> +++$+++ Hi. ive just taken fm-stub to [[Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion]]. it wasnt officially proposed or debated at [[WP:WSS/P]], which is the way we make sure that stub template names arent ambiguous and couldnt relate to things like FM radio, and also where we make sure there are plenty of stubs existing before the template is made. in future please propose new stub types before making new ones! <small><i><font color="#990000">[[User:BL Lacertae|BL Lacertae]]</font> - <font color="#555555">[[User talk:BL Lacertae|kiss the lizard]]</font></i></small> 00:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
277055 +++$+++ Pm shef +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277054 +++$+++ 277054 +++$+++ 2006-06-28 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.151559960E09 +++$+++ There's no real reason. At the time that I created it, I wasn't aware that \"standard\" infoboxes existed. I kinda like the one I put up there, but feel free to change it to the standard if you like. -  +++$+++ *There's no real reason. At the time that I created it, I wasn't aware that "standard" infoboxes existed. I kinda like the one I put up there, but feel free to change it to the standard if you like. - [[User:Pm shef|pm_shef]] 22:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

14911 +++$+++ Hlj +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14911 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-12 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.273698720E09 +++$+++ Hi. I think you are doing yeomen's work in the talk page of American Civil War. One suggestion I would make is based on the premise that a lot of people do not pay close attention to the detailed arguments of an article and instead focus on superficial things like the information box and section headers. The first section of this article, Causes of secession, is really a jumble of topics which is divided roughly in half by a subsection, Slavery--even though slavery is discussed before that subsection. It is quite possible that people are looking at the table of contents and objecting to that being the only subhead. Barring a reorganization of a lot of content, simply removing that subsection header might dispel a number of the objections we've received over the years. (I continue to maintain that the antebellum portion of this article is too long when you consider that there are three subarticles that expand on all of the topics raised, but since I am not willing to take on the task of distilling it, this will be a silent objection.)  +++$+++ Hi. I think you are doing yeomen's work in the talk page of American Civil War. One suggestion I would make is based on the premise that a lot of people do not pay close attention to the detailed arguments of an article and instead focus on superficial things like the information box and section headers. The first section of this article, Causes of secession, is really a jumble of topics which is divided roughly in half by a subsection, Slavery--even though slavery is discussed before that subsection. It is quite possible that people are looking at the table of contents and objecting to that being the only subhead. Barring a reorganization of a lot of content, simply removing that subsection header might dispel a number of the objections we've received over the years. (I continue to maintain that the antebellum portion of this article is too long when you consider that there are three subarticles that expand on all of the topics raised, but since I am not willing to take on the task of distilling it, this will be a silent objection.) [[User:Hlj|Hal Jespersen]] ([[User talk:Hlj|talk]]) 14:12, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
14912 +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14911 +++$+++ 14911 +++$+++ 2010-05-12 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.273701960E09 +++$+++ I agree with both of your ideas regarding the subsection label and the length.  The length issue has been resisted but I note that there is a small (at this point) group (see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/American Civil War task force\/Operation Brothers at War]]) that has raising the article to FA as a goal. If that project gets off the ground then these issues will need to be addressed.  +++$+++ : I agree with both of your ideas regarding the subsection label and the length.  The length issue has been resisted but I note that there is a small (at this point) group (see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/American Civil War task force/Operation Brothers at War]]) that has raising the article to FA as a goal. If that project gets off the ground then these issues will need to be addressed. [[User:North Shoreman|Tom (North Shoreman)]] ([[User talk:North Shoreman|talk]]) 15:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

277059 +++$+++ HJKeats +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-30 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.151651520E09 +++$+++ Great work on the articles you have created depicting the flags of Newfoundland.  +++$+++ Great work on the articles you have created depicting the flags of Newfoundland. [[User:HJKeats|HJKeats]] 00:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
277060 +++$+++ HJKeats +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277059 +++$+++ 277059 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.151652300E09 +++$+++ I have the book (''The Oldest City'' The Story of St. John\u2019s, Newfoundland (2003) ISBN 0973027126) by [[Paul O'Neill (author)|Paul O'Neil]], he devotes two pages to the tricolour. I'll have a read and add any new info.  +++$+++ :I have the book (''The Oldest City'' The Story of St. John’s, Newfoundland (2003) ISBN 0973027126) by [[Paul O'Neill (author)|Paul O'Neil]], he devotes two pages to the tricolour. I'll have a read and add any new info. [[User:HJKeats|HJKeats]] 00:25, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
277061 +++$+++ HJKeats +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277059 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.151705280E09 +++$+++ Is there any background information you wish researched? I put in an article for the [[Native's Society]] to bolster the origin of the flag; I have a bit more to add before the article is complete. Are you ready to have the article [[Newfoundland Tricolour]] nominated for DYK?  +++$+++ :::Is there any background information you wish researched? I put in an article for the [[Native's Society]] to bolster the origin of the flag; I have a bit more to add before the article is complete. Are you ready to have the article [[Newfoundland Tricolour]] nominated for DYK? [[User:HJKeats|HJKeats]] 15:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

14917 +++$+++ Joe Decker +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14917 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-10 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.278792780E09 +++$+++ Nice work on finding a compromise that could gain consensus on the contentuous SLPC lede issue.  Well done!   --<font color='#66dd44'> +++$+++ Nice work on finding a compromise that could gain consensus on the contentuous SLPC lede issue.  Well done!   --<font color='#66dd44'>[[User:Joe Decker|j<small>&#9883;</small>e decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|<sup><small><i>talk</i></small></sup>]]</font> 13:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
14918 +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14917 +++$+++ 14917 +++$+++ 2010-07-10 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.278809580E09 +++$+++ And look how long that consensus lasted!!  +++$+++ :And look how long that consensus lasted!! [[User:North Shoreman|Tom (North Shoreman)]] ([[User talk:North Shoreman#top|talk]]) 17:53, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

277062 +++$+++ HJKeats +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-30 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.151707500E09 +++$+++ The quote {{cquote|\"The tricolor was flown at Government House during the Boyle and Murray administrations at the turn of the 20th century and was shown on 19th century flag charts as the flag of Newfoundland.\" }} came directly out of the Encyclopedia, it just lists references at the end of the article and not tied specifically to statements within the article itself. <br> <br> I can give you another from Paul O'Neil's book (''The Oldest City'' The Story of St. John\u2019s, Newfoundland (2003) ISBN 0973027126 p. 516) {{cquote|\"\"It was flown at Government House by Governor Boyle, as well as from the staffs of private homes, commercial concerns, public buildings and from the mastheads and sterns of Newfoundland vessels at sea. As late as 1907 an official mail steamer entered the port of St. John's flying the pink, white and green.\"}}  +++$+++ The quote {{cquote|"The tricolor was flown at Government House during the Boyle and Murray administrations at the turn of the 20th century and was shown on 19th century flag charts as the flag of Newfoundland." }} came directly out of the Encyclopedia, it just lists references at the end of the article and not tied specifically to statements within the article itself. <br> <br> I can give you another from Paul O'Neil's book (''The Oldest City'' The Story of St. John’s, Newfoundland (2003) ISBN 0973027126 p. 516) {{cquote|""It was flown at Government House by Governor Boyle, as well as from the staffs of private homes, commercial concerns, public buildings and from the mastheads and sterns of Newfoundland vessels at sea. As late as 1907 an official mail steamer entered the port of St. John's flying the pink, white and green."}} [[User:HJKeats|HJKeats]] 15:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
277063 +++$+++ HJKeats +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277062 +++$+++ 277062 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.151709360E09 +++$+++ Can't give any substantiation of the references contained in the Independent, except for the North American reference that I mention on the article talk page, that come directly from Paul O'Neill's book. Here's the reference {{cquote|\"The Bishop was familiar with the flag of the [[Native's Society]], and had been presented with one in 1837. This is the first authentic knowledge we have of the flag's existence.... The Union Jack did not assume its present form until 1848, about a dozen years after the introduction of the first Native's flag.\"}} <br> Can't help you with the formatting, sorry...  +++$+++ :Can't give any substantiation of the references contained in the Independent, except for the North American reference that I mention on the article talk page, that come directly from Paul O'Neill's book. Here's the reference {{cquote|"The Bishop was familiar with the flag of the [[Native's Society]], and had been presented with one in 1837. This is the first authentic knowledge we have of the flag's existence.... The Union Jack did not assume its present form until 1848, about a dozen years after the introduction of the first Native's flag."}} <br> Can't help you with the formatting, sorry... [[User:HJKeats|HJKeats]] 16:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

14919 +++$+++ Dubyavee +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14919 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-26 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.280149860E09 +++$+++ Hi Tom. I have watched the edits on the article for the past week, and I thought I had a resolution to the issue, and posted a short quote from Kenneth W. Noe, a very respected historian, re: civilian prisoners. I thought this would end the repeated editing, but within a half-hour my edit was reverted by Rjensen. I restored my edit, which I think is fair, and I hope you will uphold it, as it is quite valid and relevent. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Tom. I have watched the edits on the article for the past week, and I thought I had a resolution to the issue, and posted a short quote from Kenneth W. Noe, a very respected historian, re: civilian prisoners. I thought this would end the repeated editing, but within a half-hour my edit was reverted by Rjensen. I restored my edit, which I think is fair, and I hope you will uphold it, as it is quite valid and relevent. Thanks. [[User:Dubyavee|Dubyavee]] ([[User talk:Dubyavee|talk]]) 06:11, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
14920 +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14919 +++$+++ 14919 +++$+++ 2010-07-26 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.280173740E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure how you figured that adding this material twice without discussion or consensus would resolve an edit war.  I have explained my reasoning on the article's discussion page.  +++$+++ :I'm not sure how you figured that adding this material twice without discussion or consensus would resolve an edit war.  I have explained my reasoning on the article's discussion page. [[User:North Shoreman|Tom (North Shoreman)]] ([[User talk:North Shoreman#top|talk]]) 12:49, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

14921 +++$+++ LaNaranja +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-30 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.280536680E09 +++$+++ Hi Tom. I understood from your notes at the LF Talk page that you have a copy of the Oney book, ''And the Dead Shall Rise.'' I don't have a  copy, and I'd like to add it to the citations for Judge Roan's key statement, ''\"Gentlemen, I have thought about this case more than any other I have ever tried.... But I do not have to be convinced. The jury was convinced.\"'' At [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Leo_Frank&diff=prev&oldid=376285115 this diff] you can see the ref where I started to add it: it's in the currently renamed (sigh) [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Leo_Frank#Legal_Proceedings.2C_Motions_for_a_New_Trial_and_Appeals Appeals section]. If you have a copy, when you get a chance would you please fill in the page number? (I realize more than one cite isn't necessary usually, but this situation is different, at least for the time being.) Thank you. --  +++$+++ Hi Tom. I understood from your notes at the LF Talk page that you have a copy of the Oney book, ''And the Dead Shall Rise.'' I don't have a  copy, and I'd like to add it to the citations for Judge Roan's key statement, ''"Gentlemen, I have thought about this case more than any other I have ever tried.... But I do not have to be convinced. The jury was convinced."'' At [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leo_Frank&diff=prev&oldid=376285115 this diff] you can see the ref where I started to add it: it's in the currently renamed (sigh) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Frank#Legal_Proceedings.2C_Motions_for_a_New_Trial_and_Appeals Appeals section]. If you have a copy, when you get a chance would you please fill in the page number? (I realize more than one cite isn't necessary usually, but this situation is different, at least for the time being.) Thank you. -- [[User:LaNaranja|LaNaranja]] ([[User talk:LaNaranja|talk]]) 17:38, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
14922 +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14921 +++$+++ 14921 +++$+++ 2010-07-31 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.280572260E09 +++$+++ I'll be glad to, but I'm out of town this weekend -- will check on Oney when I get back.  +++$+++ :I'll be glad to, but I'm out of town this weekend -- will check on Oney when I get back. [[User:North Shoreman|Tom (North Shoreman)]] ([[User talk:North Shoreman#top|talk]]) 03:31, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

277067 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-01 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.151822160E09 +++$+++ Happy Canada Day, friend. <span style=\"border: 1px solid green;\"><font style=\"background: green\" face=\"Arial\" color=\"#FFFFFF\"> +++$+++ Happy Canada Day, friend. <span style="border: 1px solid green;"><font style="background: green" face="Arial" color="#FFFFFF">[[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]]</font></span> 23:36, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
277068 +++$+++ Ardenn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277067 +++$+++ 277067 +++$+++ 2006-07-01 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.151823000E09 +++$+++ Grats on the [[skydiving]]. I wanna do that sometime, myself. It's off and on rain, so we may go to fireworks, but some locally. The hill is too crowded. <span style=\"border: 1px solid green;\"><font style=\"background: green\" face=\"Arial\" color=\"#FFFFFF\"> +++$+++ :Grats on the [[skydiving]]. I wanna do that sometime, myself. It's off and on rain, so we may go to fireworks, but some locally. The hill is too crowded. <span style="border: 1px solid green;"><font style="background: green" face="Arial" color="#FFFFFF">[[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]]</font></span> 23:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

14924 +++$+++ Kim0290 +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-21 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.282404840E09 +++$+++ I think one should look up what \" vandalism \"and what it falls under and should this thread [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Slavery_in_the_United_States#Add_Black_slave_masters_to_section_Free_black_men link ]  go further up the food chain ? ? -- +++$+++ I think one should look up what " vandalism "and what it falls under and should this thread [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Slavery_in_the_United_States#Add_Black_slave_masters_to_section_Free_black_men link ]  go further up the food chain ? ? --[[User:Kim0290|Kimmy]] ([[User talk:Kim0290|talk]]) 08:34, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
14925 +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14924 +++$+++ 14924 +++$+++ 2010-08-21 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.282414500E09 +++$+++ Eliminating your plagiarized, POV edits is not vandalism.  I believe I am the fourth editor to address the inappropriateness of your edits.  +++$+++ :Eliminating your plagiarized, POV edits is not vandalism.  I believe I am the fourth editor to address the inappropriateness of your edits. [[User:North Shoreman|Tom (North Shoreman)]] ([[User talk:North Shoreman#top|talk]]) 11:15, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

277070 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-02 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.151879580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions, especially helping get the nomination sorted out! '''<font color=\"green\">[[User:Lar\/Esperanza|+]]<\/font>[[Special:Emailuser\/Lar|+]]''' +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions, especially helping get the nomination sorted out! '''<font color="green">[[User:Lar/Esperanza|+]]</font>[[Special:Emailuser/Lar|+]]'''[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 15:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
277071 +++$+++ OMEN +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277070 +++$+++ 277070 +++$+++ 2006-07-02 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.151892180E09 +++$+++ No problem.  Again, thanks for all your help. Now I have to go back to editting [[Military history of Brazil]].  +++$+++ :No problem.  Again, thanks for all your help. Now I have to go back to editting [[Military history of Brazil]]. [[User:OMEN|OMEN]] 19:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

14929 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-05 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.294228800E09 +++$+++ |}-- +++$+++ |}--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 04:00, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
14930 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14929 +++$+++ 14929 +++$+++ 2011-01-23 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.295827920E09 +++$+++ Welcome to the project. -- +++$+++ :Welcome to the project. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 16:12, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

570467 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-24 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.219601040E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I thought you'd like to know how it turned out. -  +++$+++ Anyway, I thought you'd like to know how it turned out. - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 11:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
570468 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570467 +++$+++ 570467 +++$+++ 2008-08-24 11:23:00 +++$+++ 1.219602180E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 11:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
570469 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570467 +++$+++ 570468 +++$+++ 2008-08-24 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.219605000E09 +++$+++ See also [https:\/\/bugzilla.wikimedia.org\/show_bug.cgi?id=2889 this bug]. -  +++$+++ ::See also [https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2889 this bug]. - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 12:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

14932 +++$+++ Shearonink +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-17 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.295305980E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know that I adjusted the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:MrZiller&diff=prev&oldid=408400618 header] you left for a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:MrZiller&action=history warning] (dated today) from the error of 'January 2010' to the correct 'January 2011'. Hope that's ok.  +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know that I adjusted the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MrZiller&diff=prev&oldid=408400618 header] you left for a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MrZiller&action=history warning] (dated today) from the error of 'January 2010' to the correct 'January 2011'. Hope that's ok. [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 15:13, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
14933 +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14932 +++$+++ 14932 +++$+++ 2011-01-17 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.295307060E09 +++$+++ Time flies!!  +++$+++ :Time flies!! [[User:North Shoreman|Tom (North Shoreman)]] ([[User talk:North Shoreman#top|talk]]) 15:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

89870 +++$+++ Eastmain +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ 89870 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-18 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.221805320E09 +++$+++ When I posted my comments at [[User_talk:Jimbo_Wales]] about [[Joseph H. Wales]], my expectation was that Jimbo would say \"Cool!\" whether or not the scientist was related to him. I was not trying to get the article deleted, and I feel (as you do) that [[Joseph H. Wales]] is notable. -- +++$+++ When I posted my comments at [[User_talk:Jimbo_Wales]] about [[Joseph H. Wales]], my expectation was that Jimbo would say "Cool!" whether or not the scientist was related to him. I was not trying to get the article deleted, and I feel (as you do) that [[Joseph H. Wales]] is notable. --[[User:Eastmain|Eastmain]] ([[User talk:Eastmain|talk]]) 23:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
89871 +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ 89870 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-19 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.221825960E09 +++$+++ thank's for the explanation -- +++$+++ ::thank's for the explanation --[[User:Melly42|Melly42]] ([[User talk:Melly42#top|talk]]) 05:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

14934 +++$+++ 184.36.90.183 +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-18 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.295364000E09 +++$+++ You appear to be in violation of the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith Assume Good Faith] principle (one of the fundamental principles of Wikipedia) with respect to your comments regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Confederate_States_of_America&diff=prev&oldid=408096696 this edit] made to the [[Confederate States of America]] article. This edit, made by anonymous user [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/99.157.58.170 99.157.58.170], was incorrectly reverted by the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:ClueBot_NG ClueBot NG] robot as \"vandalism\" when in fact it was a good faith edit; correcting this erroneous characterization of another editor's edit (made by a robot and then made again by an overzealous human editor, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Breawycker Breawycker]) is not \"edit warring\". Please review the Wikipedia policies in question, and have a wonderful time editing Wikipedia! [[Special:Contributions\/184.36.90.183|184.36.90.183]] ( +++$+++ You appear to be in violation of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith Assume Good Faith] principle (one of the fundamental principles of Wikipedia) with respect to your comments regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Confederate_States_of_America&diff=prev&oldid=408096696 this edit] made to the [[Confederate States of America]] article. This edit, made by anonymous user [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/99.157.58.170 99.157.58.170], was incorrectly reverted by the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ClueBot_NG ClueBot NG] robot as "vandalism" when in fact it was a good faith edit; correcting this erroneous characterization of another editor's edit (made by a robot and then made again by an overzealous human editor, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Breawycker Breawycker]) is not "edit warring". Please review the Wikipedia policies in question, and have a wonderful time editing Wikipedia! [[Special:Contributions/184.36.90.183|184.36.90.183]] ([[User talk:184.36.90.183|talk]]) 07:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
14935 +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14934 +++$+++ 14934 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.295385900E09 +++$+++ Regardless of your reasons, you reverted the same info. three times.  It was edit warring whether you were right or not.  In fact, the edit in question may or may not have been vandalism, but it was certainly factually inaccurate and you repeatedly reinserted the factually inaccurate material. I properly issued a 3RR Warning to you.  +++$+++ :Regardless of your reasons, you reverted the same info. three times.  It was edit warring whether you were right or not.  In fact, the edit in question may or may not have been vandalism, but it was certainly factually inaccurate and you repeatedly reinserted the factually inaccurate material. I properly issued a 3RR Warning to you. [[User:North Shoreman|Tom (North Shoreman)]] ([[User talk:North Shoreman#top|talk]]) 13:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

539225 +++$+++ Valentinian +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539225 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.175833320E09 +++$+++ I was just catching up a bit on [[Eastern Rumelia]] when I noticed that the coat of arms shown on this article is different from the one shown on the article about [[Bulgarian unification]], although the two seem to be related. Do you know which insignia is the correct one, and if you do, would you mind updating the articles accordingly? Happy editing.  +++$+++ I was just catching up a bit on [[Eastern Rumelia]] when I noticed that the coat of arms shown on this article is different from the one shown on the article about [[Bulgarian unification]], although the two seem to be related. Do you know which insignia is the correct one, and if you do, would you mind updating the articles accordingly? Happy editing. [[User:Valentinian|Valentinian]] <sup>[[User_talk:Valentinian|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Valentinian|C]]</sup> 21:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
539226 +++$+++ Valentinian +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539225 +++$+++ 539225 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.175882700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply. I've never seen illustrations of this insignia elsewhere, so it is likely that it was never properly defined (in any case, the Bulgarian arms is prettier). Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your reply. I've never seen illustrations of this insignia elsewhere, so it is likely that it was never properly defined (in any case, the Bulgarian arms is prettier). Thanks again. [[User:Valentinian|Valentinian]] <sup>[[User_talk:Valentinian|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Valentinian|C]]</sup> 11:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

14940 +++$+++ WikiManOne +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14940 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.296178320E09 +++$+++ <sub>[[Special:Contributions\/WikiManOne|nonsense with this]]<\/sub> +++$+++ <sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiManOne|nonsense with this]]</sub>[[User:WikiManOne|WikiManOne]]<sup>[[User_talk:WikiManOne|speaking drivel!]]</sup> 17:32, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
14941 +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14940 +++$+++ 14940 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.296182520E09 +++$+++ Thanks -- you beat me to it.  +++$+++ :Thanks -- you beat me to it. [[User:North Shoreman|Tom (North Shoreman)]] ([[User talk:North Shoreman#top|talk]]) 18:42, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

277085 +++$+++ Tewfik +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277085 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-16 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.153113300E09 +++$+++ Lebanese is specifically used instead of civilians because the numbers cited don't distinguish between civilians and militants. Cheers,<font style=\"color:#22AA00;\">''' +++$+++ Lebanese is specifically used instead of civilians because the numbers cited don't distinguish between civilians and militants. Cheers,<font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 22:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
277086 +++$+++ Tewfik +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277085 +++$+++ 277085 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.153113540E09 +++$+++ That i strue, but it is a minor problem since the vast majority of injured are Lebanese citizens. There is a foreign subsection for elaboration in the casualties section below in the article. <font style=\"color:#22AA00;\">''' +++$+++ :That i strue, but it is a minor problem since the vast majority of injured are Lebanese citizens. There is a foreign subsection for elaboration in the casualties section below in the article. <font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 22:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
277087 +++$+++ Tewfik +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277085 +++$+++ 277086 +++$+++ 2006-07-16 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.153113900E09 +++$+++ Its hardly a problem of truth: the full casualty count for every other nationality is listed in its appropriate section, but we can't include all 4-5 nationalities in the conflict box as it would be too cluttered, disorganised, and generally unehlpful. <font style=\"color:#22AA00;\">''' +++$+++ ::Its hardly a problem of truth: the full casualty count for every other nationality is listed in its appropriate section, but we can't include all 4-5 nationalities in the conflict box as it would be too cluttered, disorganised, and generally unehlpful. <font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 22:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

14943 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14943 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-28 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.296230220E09 +++$+++ I am making a good faith effort to meld your ideas with those of Casliber and others.  Please read through my explanation of the differences between the two proposals and also think about what other comments have been left on the page, including the new ideas from Hjal. I suggest that we wait until late Friday night (e.g., 11 p.m. EST) to give everyone a chance to read the page and new material that has been posted. Thanks,  +++$+++ I am making a good faith effort to meld your ideas with those of Casliber and others.  Please read through my explanation of the differences between the two proposals and also think about what other comments have been left on the page, including the new ideas from Hjal. I suggest that we wait until late Friday night (e.g., 11 p.m. EST) to give everyone a chance to read the page and new material that has been posted. Thanks, [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 07:57, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
14944 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14943 +++$+++ 14943 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.296257160E09 +++$+++ I made a few changes to the proposal you submitted that everyone seemed to agree on. Mostly little punctuation and grammer things but some did include some comments made by others that I agreed were good improvements. I used Cquote just so it looked different but feel free to change it to quote or whatever other changes you think are needed. I think we are finally getting close to getting this issue wrapped up and thank you for your help. -- +++$+++ :I made a few changes to the proposal you submitted that everyone seemed to agree on. Mostly little punctuation and grammer things but some did include some comments made by others that I agreed were good improvements. I used Cquote just so it looked different but feel free to change it to quote or whatever other changes you think are needed. I think we are finally getting close to getting this issue wrapped up and thank you for your help. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 15:26, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

539234 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-14 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.176592260E09 +++$+++ Maybe here: [http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar?q=banat+bulgarian&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/].  +++$+++ Maybe here: [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=banat+bulgarian&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search http://scholar.google.com/]. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 16:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
539235 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539234 +++$+++ 539234 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.176604080E09 +++$+++ Category [[:GA-Class Bulgaria articles]] missing; left a note on the WikiProject Talk. -- +++$+++ * Category [[:GA-Class Bulgaria articles]] missing; left a note on the WikiProject Talk. --[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 19:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
539236 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539234 +++$+++ 539234 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.176604200E09 +++$+++ Yep, it hadn't been created because there were no articles to populate it. I've just created it :) ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : Yep, it hadn't been created because there were no articles to populate it. I've just created it :) ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 19:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

539237 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.176778200E09 +++$+++ \u041f\u0440\u0430\u0432 \u0441\u0438, \u043d\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u044f \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0432 \u043b\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0442\u043e \u0441\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e, \u043d\u0438\u0442\u043e \u043f\u044a\u043a \u0434\u0430 \u044f \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0436\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435 \u043a\u044a\u0434\u0435\u0442\u043e \u0442\u0440\u044f\u0431\u0432\u0430. \u0429\u0435 \u0441\u044a\u043c \u0442\u0438 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0431\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u0435\u043d \u0430\u043a\u043e \u0433\u043e \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0448[[Image:Smile.gif|20px]]. -- +++$+++ Прав си, не мога да преместя статията в личното си пространство, нито пък да я сложа после където трябва. Ще съм ти много благодарен ако го направиш[[Image:Smile.gif|20px]]. --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 19:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
539238 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539237 +++$+++ 539237 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.176780300E09 +++$+++ \u0427\u0443\u0434\u0435\u0441\u043d\u043e: ) \u041d\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0432\u044f\u0439 \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u043e\u0442\u0431\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0436\u0438\u0448 \u0438 \u043d\u044f\u043a\u043e\u0438 \u0437\u0435\u043c\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0435\u0432\u0435\u0440 \u043e\u0442 \u0414\u0443\u043d\u0430\u0432, \u0437\u0430\u0449\u043e\u0442\u043e \u0432 \u0438\u0437\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0438\u0448\u0435 \u0447\u0435 \u0441\u0435 \u0435 \u0431\u0438\u043b \u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0431\u0435\u0434\u0438\u043b \u0432\u0438\u0437\u0430\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0439\u0446\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0442\u0430\u043c. \u0429\u0435 \u0442\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0436\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u044a\u0440\u0448\u0430 \u0438 \u0449\u0435 \u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0442\u044f \u0438 \u0446\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0442\u043e\u0433\u0430\u0432\u0430. \u0429\u0435 \u0441\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043c \u0434\u0430 \u0435 \u0432\u044a\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e \u043d\u0430\u0439-\u0431\u044a\u0440\u0437\u043e, \u043d\u043e \u0438 \u0430\u0437 \u043d\u0435 \u0432\u0438\u043d\u0430\u0433\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0438\u0440\u0430\u043c \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435 (\u0432 \u043f\u0435\u0442\u044a\u043a \u0434\u043e\u0440\u0438 \u0449\u0435 \u0438\u043c\u0430\u043c 15 \u043c\u0438\u043d \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u0432 \u0440\u043e\u0434\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0442\u0438 \u041f\u043b\u0435\u0432\u0435\u043d) \u0411\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438: ) -- +++$+++ :Чудесно: ) Не забравяй на картата да отбележиш и някои земи на север от Дунав, защото в източниците пише че се е бил и победил византийците там. Ще ти кажа като привърша и ще те пратя и цитата тогава. Ще се опитам да е възможно най-бързо, но и аз не винаги намирам време (в петък дори ще имам 15 мин престой в родния ти Плевен) Благодарности: ) --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 20:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

277097 +++$+++ WikiWoo +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-25 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.153884900E09 +++$+++ You must stop persecuting me and harrasinig me about everything I contribute. Your revert on the Single-Tier Municipality Listing was most disturbing and shows you to be some paid propaganda pusher for some government client of yours. Stop Censoring Information. +++$+++ You must stop persecuting me and harrasinig me about everything I contribute. Your revert on the Single-Tier Municipality Listing was most disturbing and shows you to be some paid propaganda pusher for some government client of yours. Stop Censoring Information.[[User:WikiWoo|WikiWoo]] 20:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
277098 +++$+++ DarkAudit +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277097 +++$+++ 277097 +++$+++ 2006-07-28 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.154087340E09 +++$+++ It's paranoia. Third name isn't the charm. Still engaging in calling anyone who won't see things his way either agents of the Ontario government or Gestapo. Sometimes both. Frankly, I'm sick of it. I try to help Wikipedia maintain it's standards, and this loon goes absolutely berzerk. I bet he'll still try to call me a government agent, even though I've spent a grand total of ''four days'' in Canada in my entire life, and most of that was spent drinking. :) -- +++$+++ : It's paranoia. Third name isn't the charm. Still engaging in calling anyone who won't see things his way either agents of the Ontario government or Gestapo. Sometimes both. Frankly, I'm sick of it. I try to help Wikipedia maintain it's standards, and this loon goes absolutely berzerk. I bet he'll still try to call me a government agent, even though I've spent a grand total of ''four days'' in Canada in my entire life, and most of that was spent drinking. :) --[[User:DarkAudit|DarkAudit]] 04:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

539243 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539243 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-23 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.177397940E09 +++$+++ Best regards. -- +++$+++ Best regards. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 23:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
539244 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539243 +++$+++ 539243 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.177453920E09 +++$+++ Let's then include '''all''' of the theories and write them, instead of just none? As far as I understood, among the Gorans themselves there is a division - one half couldn't think of themselves as anything other than Serbs, while the other half maintains its separate culture, including the new studies that speculate their (partial though) origin from the Arabic lands far-off in Asia. -- +++$+++ :Let's then include '''all''' of the theories and write them, instead of just none? As far as I understood, among the Gorans themselves there is a division - one half couldn't think of themselves as anything other than Serbs, while the other half maintains its separate culture, including the new studies that speculate their (partial though) origin from the Arabic lands far-off in Asia. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 15:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

463137 +++$+++ Shijianbiao +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 463137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-13 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.268519220E09 +++$+++ Hello, I noticed that you speed deleted this page. And I would like to retrieve the page and to make some editting on it. The reason I think this page is a useful resource for Wikipedia is because the \"comparing time tracking table\" on the wikipedia site contains some companys that the reference links are not there any more(click on the reference links for them, you will see what i mean), or the products have nothing new to offer to your viewer but a simpler version of some the existing ones in the list. Versus Pacific Timesheet has something unique that noone in the list has: it is state rule compliance, california labor law compliance, and it has fully supported Chinese_version and French_Version. Please let me know what do you think and how I can retrieve the page back for more editting. Thank you!  +++$+++ Hello, I noticed that you speed deleted this page. And I would like to retrieve the page and to make some editting on it. The reason I think this page is a useful resource for Wikipedia is because the "comparing time tracking table" on the wikipedia site contains some companys that the reference links are not there any more(click on the reference links for them, you will see what i mean), or the products have nothing new to offer to your viewer but a simpler version of some the existing ones in the list. Versus Pacific Timesheet has something unique that noone in the list has: it is state rule compliance, california labor law compliance, and it has fully supported Chinese_version and French_Version. Please let me know what do you think and how I can retrieve the page back for more editting. Thank you! [[User:Shijianbiao|Shijianbiao]] ([[User talk:Shijianbiao|talk]]) 14:27, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
463138 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ 463137 +++$+++ 463137 +++$+++ 2010-03-13 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.268524800E09 +++$+++ Requested articel restored and userfied. Responded at [[User talk:Shijianbiao#Article restored]]  +++$+++ :Requested articel restored and userfied. Responded at [[User talk:Shijianbiao#Article restored]] [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

14958 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-16 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.308278580E09 +++$+++ I have started a [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States History|discussion]] and will contact each of the active members for their comments and input on the suggestion. Please take a moment and add your comments to the discussion or feel free to contact me if you have any questions. -- +++$+++ I have started a [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States History|discussion]] and will contact each of the active members for their comments and input on the suggestion. Please take a moment and add your comments to the discussion or feel free to contact me if you have any questions. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 19:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
14959 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ North Shoreman +++$+++ 14958 +++$+++ 14958 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308781320E09 +++$+++ Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives\u2014which houses some of America's most important historical documents\u2014is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/NARA\/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]].  +++$+++ :Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]]. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

264637 +++$+++ Midrashah +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264637 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-18 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.247962800E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Midrashah|Midrashah]] ([[User talk:Midrashah|talk]]) 17:20, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
264638 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264637 +++$+++ 264637 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.247962920E09 +++$+++ That's fine for their project. This is the English Wikipedia. Notability is indicated through independent, third-party sources. Without them, no article.  +++$+++ :That's fine for their project. This is the English Wikipedia. Notability is indicated through independent, third-party sources. Without them, no article. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 17:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

277105 +++$+++ Woodshed +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-09 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.155131340E09 +++$+++ Thank you for making the effort to improve Wikipedia!  +++$+++ Thank you for making the effort to improve Wikipedia! [[User:Woodshed|Woodshed]] 06:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
277106 +++$+++ Woodshed +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277105 +++$+++ 277105 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.155152040E09 +++$+++ I encourage you to '''[[WP:BOLD|be bold]]''' and make the article better in any and all facets, if you feel there is a problem with it. Posting non-specific talk page comments doesn't achieve this. Thanks!  +++$+++ :I encourage you to '''[[WP:BOLD|be bold]]''' and make the article better in any and all facets, if you feel there is a problem with it. Posting non-specific talk page comments doesn't achieve this. Thanks! [[User:Woodshed|Woodshed]] 12:34, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
277107 +++$+++ Woodshed +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277105 +++$+++ 277106 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.155152520E09 +++$+++ As I understand it, we sort stubs here. In fact, [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting|You can help!]]  +++$+++ ::As I understand it, we sort stubs here. In fact, [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting|You can help!]] [[User:Woodshed|Woodshed]] 12:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
277108 +++$+++ Woodshed +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277105 +++$+++ 277107 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.155153480E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure why you felt the need to be obtuse in making this point -- 4th talk comment now -- but your current edit is terrible, since it identifies him neither as an a) painter b) photographer c) Turk d) NYC resident. Mass dumping into the broadest possible categories creates a lot of subsequent work for other people. For my part, I would be happy to have my work reverted, criticized, or commented on. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::I'm not sure why you felt the need to be obtuse in making this point -- 4th talk comment now -- but your current edit is terrible, since it identifies him neither as an a) painter b) photographer c) Turk d) NYC resident. Mass dumping into the broadest possible categories creates a lot of subsequent work for other people. For my part, I would be happy to have my work reverted, criticized, or commented on. Thanks. [[User:Woodshed|Woodshed]] 12:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
277109 +++$+++ Woodshed +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277105 +++$+++ 277108 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.155161580E09 +++$+++ Your first comment similarly said ''absolutely nothing''. If you have something to say, say it.<p>I still think more stubs could be useful -- notice, even that the categories put the article in both ''painter'' and ''photography'', plus he is apparently well known in New York -- but I guess multiple, useful stub categories are frowned upon 'round here.  +++$+++ ::::Your first comment similarly said ''absolutely nothing''. If you have something to say, say it.<p>I still think more stubs could be useful -- notice, even that the categories put the article in both ''painter'' and ''photography'', plus he is apparently well known in New York -- but I guess multiple, useful stub categories are frowned upon 'round here. [[User:Woodshed|Woodshed]] 15:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

14964 +++$+++ WFCforLife +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14964 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-16 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.284684000E09 +++$+++ {{wb|WFCforLife}} -- +++$+++ {{wb|WFCforLife}} --[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]-- 17:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
14965 +++$+++ WFCforLife +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14964 +++$+++ 14964 +++$+++ 2010-09-18 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.284811860E09 +++$+++ Hey there. Sorry to bother you again. Just remembered that I'd configured [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=Association+football+players+by+club&basedeep=5&mode=ss&size=500&stubop=or&links=0&go=Scan&format=html&userlang=en this catscan] a little while back, and thought it might be of interest to you too. It takes about a minute to load, but lists the smallest football player biographies on wikipedia. Many of them are unreferenced, and given that I set the limit to 500 bytes, anything that ''is'' referenced is obviously of an even lower quality to still manage to fall under that limit. Regards, -- +++$+++ :Hey there. Sorry to bother you again. Just remembered that I'd configured [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=Association+football+players+by+club&basedeep=5&mode=ss&size=500&stubop=or&links=0&go=Scan&format=html&userlang=en this catscan] a little while back, and thought it might be of interest to you too. It takes about a minute to load, but lists the smallest football player biographies on wikipedia. Many of them are unreferenced, and given that I set the limit to 500 bytes, anything that ''is'' referenced is obviously of an even lower quality to still manage to fall under that limit. Regards, --[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]-- 05:11, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

539253 +++$+++ Groser +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-02 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.178134920E09 +++$+++ \u0411\u044a\u0434\u0438 \u0441\u0438\u0433\u0443\u0440\u0435\u043d, \u0447\u0435 \u0437\u0430 \u0432\u0441\u0435\u043a\u0438 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u0434 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0449\u043e \u043b\u043e\u0448\u043e \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0432\u044f\u0440\u043d\u043e. \u0410\u043a\u043e \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e \u0434\u044a\u0440\u0436\u0438\u0448 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u044f\u0436\u0434\u0430\u0448 \u0437\u0430 \u0433\u043b\u0443\u043f\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043e\u0442 \u0438\u043d\u0430\u0442 \u0434\u0430 \u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0435 \u0442\u0432\u043e\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f \u0441\u0431\u044a\u0440\u043a\u0430\u043b \u0441\u0438 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e.-- +++$+++ Бъди сигурен, че за всеки град може да се намери нещо лошо или невярно. Ако само държиш да се заяждаш за глупости или от инат да остане твоята версия сбъркал си много.--[[User:Groser|Groser]] 12:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
539254 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539253 +++$+++ 539253 +++$+++ 2007-05-04 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.178302500E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0439! \u0414\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0435 \u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0442\u043e: \u0434\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u0447\u0438\u0448 \u0432 \u0443\u0438\u043a\u0438\u043f\u0435\u0434\u0438\u044f \u0440\u0438\u0441\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0430, \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u043d\u0430 Paint \u0437\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0432\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0444\u043b\u043e\u0442. \u0420\u0438\u0441\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0435 \u043f\u043e \u0438\u0437\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u043e \u0441\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u041f\u0440\u0435\u0441\u043b\u0430\u0432 \u0438 \u041f\u043b\u0438\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u0438 \u0435 \u043c\u0430\u043b\u043a\u043e \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043f\u043e\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0430, \u043d\u043e \u0442\u0435 \u0438 \u043e\u0440\u0438\u0433\u0438\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0430 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0438\u0432\u0430: ) \u0429\u0435 \u0441\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043c \u0434\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u044f \u043f\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0447\u0435 \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f \u0434\u0430 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0448\u0438\u0440\u044f \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0435 \u0445\u0443\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0434\u0430 \u0438\u043c\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u043d\u043a\u0438... \u041d\u043e \u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0435, \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435 \u0438 \u043d\u0438\u0449\u043e \u0434\u0430 \u043d\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u044f... -- +++$+++ :Здравей! Дали може да стане следното: да качиш в уикипедия рисунка, направена на Paint за статията за средновековния флот. Рисунката е по изображенията по стените на Преслав и Плиска и е малко нескопосана, но те и оригиналите са такива: ) Ще се опитам да намеря повече информация да разширя статията и за това е хубаво да има картинки... Но кой знае, може и нищо да не намеря... --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 11:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

277110 +++$+++ Master Jay +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277110 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-17 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.155802680E09 +++$+++ Hey Oz. What is up with your userpage? Anyways, I think I've just about said everything there is to say about the [[Bramalea City Centre]]. Well, that is everything ''I'' have to say about it at least. Give it a read (since you have fresh[er] eyes), and fix anything wrong that you find. Your  quality contributions to local articles have not gone unnoticed. Regards, -- +++$+++ Hey Oz. What is up with your userpage? Anyways, I think I've just about said everything there is to say about the [[Bramalea City Centre]]. Well, that is everything ''I'' have to say about it at least. Give it a read (since you have fresh[er] eyes), and fix anything wrong that you find. Your  quality contributions to local articles have not gone unnoticed. Regards, --[[User:Master Jay|<font style="background:black">'''<font color="white">Jay</font>'''</font>]]'''<font style="background:gold">([[User talk:Master Jay|Reply]])'''</font> 01:18, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
277111 +++$+++ Master Jay +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277110 +++$+++ 277110 +++$+++ 2006-08-17 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.155848100E09 +++$+++ Yeah about that picture, I figured it would be impossible to take a photo that looked like that anytime soon, but nonetheless, you could always take a few originals if you'd like. Thanks -- +++$+++ :Yeah about that picture, I figured it would be impossible to take a photo that looked like that anytime soon, but nonetheless, you could always take a few originals if you'd like. Thanks --[[User:Master Jay|<font style="background:black">'''<font color="white">Jay</font>'''</font>]]'''<font style="background:gold">([[User talk:Master Jay|Reply]])'''</font> 13:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

277113 +++$+++ WikiWoo +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-17 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.155882660E09 +++$+++ I would appreciate that you don't create redirects on new content without attempting to debate your issue. This may appear as vandalism designed to censor information. Please use the talk page on the article to discuss issues any legitimate issue you may have with the article. So that you act like you Assume Good Faith and also Act Civily to other editors.-- +++$+++ I would appreciate that you don't create redirects on new content without attempting to debate your issue. This may appear as vandalism designed to censor information. Please use the talk page on the article to discuss issues any legitimate issue you may have with the article. So that you act like you Assume Good Faith and also Act Civily to other editors.--[[User Talk:WikiWoo|Wiki <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid; padding:0px 2px 2px 2px; color:white; background-color:darkred; font-weight:bold">The Humble</span> Woo]] 23:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
277114 +++$+++ Rparle +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277113 +++$+++ 277113 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.156059900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the info. &#8212; +++$+++ :Thanks for the info. &#8212;[[User:Rparle|Rory]] [[User_talk:rparle|&#9786;]] 00:45, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

277115 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-20 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.156119660E09 +++$+++ Actually, these teams ''act'' like national football teams.  They may not be recognized nations, but that doesn't mean they should not be called that, if they consider themselves that.  They compete against other nations (or in some cases, against other unrecognized nations).  They don't play as provinces or states or whatnot. They've been considered \"national\" on Wikipedia for some time now.  <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ Actually, these teams ''act'' like national football teams.  They may not be recognized nations, but that doesn't mean they should not be called that, if they consider themselves that.  They compete against other nations (or in some cases, against other unrecognized nations).  They don't play as provinces or states or whatnot. They've been considered "national" on Wikipedia for some time now.  <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="#0F0F77">O</font><font color="#0F0F99">z</font><font color="#0F0FCC">L</font><font color="#0F0FFF">a</font><font color="#2F2FFF">w</font><font color="#4E50FF">y</font><font color="#6E70FF">e</font><font color="#8E90FF">r</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 17:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277116 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.156120260E09 +++$+++ I notice that you created a redirect for \"New Caledonia football team\" to \"New Caledonia national football team\", and moved \"Tahiti national football team\" to \"Tahiti football team\".  You may note that both of these entities belong to FIFA, and within France, the country they belong to, they have similar status.  Although \"Tahiti\" is officially \"French Polynesia\".  One cannot be \"national\" while the other is not.  Actually, I'm going to revert your changes removing the \"national\" from all the articles you have.  As noted above, they play as nations (and, actually, by the definition I assume you're using, England (and the other British \"home nations\") is also not a \"real\" nation, so we'll have to remove \"nation\" from that article, as England is part of the independent nation of the United Kingdom). <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ :I notice that you created a redirect for "New Caledonia football team" to "New Caledonia national football team", and moved "Tahiti national football team" to "Tahiti football team".  You may note that both of these entities belong to FIFA, and within France, the country they belong to, they have similar status.  Although "Tahiti" is officially "French Polynesia".  One cannot be "national" while the other is not.  Actually, I'm going to revert your changes removing the "national" from all the articles you have.  As noted above, they play as nations (and, actually, by the definition I assume you're using, England (and the other British "home nations") is also not a "real" nation, so we'll have to remove "nation" from that article, as England is part of the independent nation of the United Kingdom). <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="#0F0F77">O</font><font color="#0F0F99">z</font><font color="#0F0FCC">L</font><font color="#0F0FFF">a</font><font color="#2F2FFF">w</font><font color="#4E50FF">y</font><font color="#6E70FF">e</font><font color="#8E90FF">r</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 17:31, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277117 +++$+++ Poppypetty +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.156121400E09 +++$+++ They act like but they are '''NOT''' national team because they ARE NOT nations. So, they shouldn't be called national teams because they are more regional teams. ''They've been considered \"national\" on Wikipedia for some time now.'' : Wikipedia doesn't decide which region is a nation and which region isn't. I am very fed up with all the stupid nationalists present in wikipedia.  +++$+++ :They act like but they are '''NOT''' national team because they ARE NOT nations. So, they shouldn't be called national teams because they are more regional teams. ''They've been considered "national" on Wikipedia for some time now.'' : Wikipedia doesn't decide which region is a nation and which region isn't. I am very fed up with all the stupid nationalists present in wikipedia. [[User:Poppypetty|Poppypetty]] 17:50, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277118 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277117 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.156121700E09 +++$+++ But Wikipedia isn't considering what is and isn't a ''nation''. It's simply presenting what purports to be a national team as a national team.  Honestly, England is not a nation, if by nation you mean an internationally recognized country that is usually a member of the United Nations.  But nobody would try to move \"England national football team\" to \"England football team\", now would they?  If Greenland, which is not an internationally recognized country but a posession of Denmark, plays against other nations, and calls their team the national team of Greenland, then that is how we present them on Wikipedia.  It has nothing to do with considering Greenland a nation or not. <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ ::But Wikipedia isn't considering what is and isn't a ''nation''. It's simply presenting what purports to be a national team as a national team.  Honestly, England is not a nation, if by nation you mean an internationally recognized country that is usually a member of the United Nations.  But nobody would try to move "England national football team" to "England football team", now would they?  If Greenland, which is not an internationally recognized country but a posession of Denmark, plays against other nations, and calls their team the national team of Greenland, then that is how we present them on Wikipedia.  It has nothing to do with considering Greenland a nation or not. <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="#0F0F77">O</font><font color="#0F0F99">z</font><font color="#0F0FCC">L</font><font color="#0F0FFF">a</font><font color="#2F2FFF">w</font><font color="#4E50FF">y</font><font color="#6E70FF">e</font><font color="#8E90FF">r</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 17:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277119 +++$+++ Poppypetty +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277118 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.156121940E09 +++$+++ By calling them \"national teams\", wikipedia (or in fact serveral nationalists) are deciding who have the right to be or not to be nations. I am sorry but calling them national teams IS POV. They are playing WITH national teams and not AS national teams but AS regional teams which is a big difference. Furthermore, you have absolutely no proof that most people from this island are considering these teams are their ''national '' teams or as their ''regional'' teams.  +++$+++ :::By calling them "national teams", wikipedia (or in fact serveral nationalists) are deciding who have the right to be or not to be nations. I am sorry but calling them national teams IS POV. They are playing WITH national teams and not AS national teams but AS regional teams which is a big difference. Furthermore, you have absolutely no proof that most people from this island are considering these teams are their ''national '' teams or as their ''regional'' teams. [[User:Poppypetty|Poppypetty]] 17:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277120 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277117 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.156121820E09 +++$+++ Please revert your reverts back again.  I can assure you that others will agree with me.  As I said before, this does not have to do with considering something a nation.  It has to do with considering a team which plays international football as an international team.  It's as simple as that. <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ ::Please revert your reverts back again.  I can assure you that others will agree with me.  As I said before, this does not have to do with considering something a nation.  It has to do with considering a team which plays international football as an international team.  It's as simple as that. <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="#0F0F77">O</font><font color="#0F0F99">z</font><font color="#0F0FCC">L</font><font color="#0F0FFF">a</font><font color="#2F2FFF">w</font><font color="#4E50FF">y</font><font color="#6E70FF">e</font><font color="#8E90FF">r</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 17:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277121 +++$+++ Poppypetty +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277120 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.156122300E09 +++$+++ I can assure you that French people will agree with me. I don't see why North Americans would impose us their notion of ''nation''. If you look at the French wikipedia, you will see that all these teams are called ''\xe9quipe de place de football'' and not ''\xe9quipe '''nationale''' de place de football''.  +++$+++ :::I can assure you that French people will agree with me. I don't see why North Americans would impose us their notion of ''nation''. If you look at the French wikipedia, you will see that all these teams are called ''équipe de place de football'' and not ''équipe '''nationale''' de place de football''. [[User:Poppypetty|Poppypetty]] 18:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277122 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277120 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.156122240E09 +++$+++ National teams play other national teams.  Calling them by what they call themselves is ''not'' claiming that they are nations.    You seem to believe that New Caledonia is a nation, for some reason, while French Polynesia (called Tahiti, but still French Polynesia), is not.  How do you justify this? How do you justify England or Wales or Scotland being a nation? <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ :::National teams play other national teams.  Calling them by what they call themselves is ''not'' claiming that they are nations.    You seem to believe that New Caledonia is a nation, for some reason, while French Polynesia (called Tahiti, but still French Polynesia), is not.  How do you justify this? How do you justify England or Wales or Scotland being a nation? <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="#0F0F77">O</font><font color="#0F0F99">z</font><font color="#0F0FCC">L</font><font color="#0F0FFF">a</font><font color="#2F2FFF">w</font><font color="#4E50FF">y</font><font color="#6E70FF">e</font><font color="#8E90FF">r</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 18:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277123 +++$+++ Poppypetty +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277122 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.156122600E09 +++$+++ Calling them by what they call themselves is ''not'' claiming that they are nations. That's my point : they are not calling themselves ''national teams''. It did let New Caledonia with the current name because there is a referendum for independence planned there in 2012 (expected results close from 50\/50) and so I thought it would be POV to change the name. Everybody is calling '''England national team'', ''Scotland national team'' but it's not the case for Martinique, Guadeloupe team and other [[DOM-TOM]] teams.  +++$+++ ::::Calling them by what they call themselves is ''not'' claiming that they are nations. That's my point : they are not calling themselves ''national teams''. It did let New Caledonia with the current name because there is a referendum for independence planned there in 2012 (expected results close from 50/50) and so I thought it would be POV to change the name. Everybody is calling '''England national team'', ''Scotland national team'' but it's not the case for Martinique, Guadeloupe team and other [[DOM-TOM]] teams. [[User:Poppypetty|Poppypetty]] 18:10, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277124 +++$+++ Poppypetty +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277122 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.156122960E09 +++$+++ Here, I am. I can provide you with a good link showing that they don't call themselves ''\xe9quipe nationale''. It's [http:\/\/www.lgf.asso.fr\/INDX%20PAGE%20EQUIPE%20GWADA.htm right here]. If you can read French, you will see that the league (regional federation if you prefer, subordinated to the French federation) is calling the team '''\xe9quipe de Guadeloupe''' and not '''\xe9quipe nationale de Guadeloupe'''. Is this enough ?  +++$+++ ::::Here, I am. I can provide you with a good link showing that they don't call themselves ''équipe nationale''. It's [http://www.lgf.asso.fr/INDX%20PAGE%20EQUIPE%20GWADA.htm right here]. If you can read French, you will see that the league (regional federation if you prefer, subordinated to the French federation) is calling the team '''équipe de Guadeloupe''' and not '''équipe nationale de Guadeloupe'''. Is this enough ? [[User:Poppypetty|Poppypetty]] 18:16, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277125 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277124 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.156123020E09 +++$+++ Okay, so let me get this straight. First you care about whether something is or is not a nation, but ignore the fact that there are several teams in FIFA which are not nations being called nations. Then you care about whether people are ''calling'' something a ''national team'' but claim that even though people aren't calling New Caledonia a nation you have to leave it being called that because some referendum on independence came up 50\/50, and finally, well, finally what?  What's the definition of \"nation\"? Independent nation?  By the criteria used on Wikipedia of what a \"country\" is, \"French Polynesia\" is one, while England is not.  I strongly recommend that you do not change this list according to your beliefs, since it's been discussed greatly as to what a country is, but check out [[List of countries]].  <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ :::::Okay, so let me get this straight. First you care about whether something is or is not a nation, but ignore the fact that there are several teams in FIFA which are not nations being called nations. Then you care about whether people are ''calling'' something a ''national team'' but claim that even though people aren't calling New Caledonia a nation you have to leave it being called that because some referendum on independence came up 50/50, and finally, well, finally what?  What's the definition of "nation"? Independent nation?  By the criteria used on Wikipedia of what a "country" is, "French Polynesia" is one, while England is not.  I strongly recommend that you do not change this list according to your beliefs, since it's been discussed greatly as to what a country is, but check out [[List of countries]].  <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="#0F0F77">O</font><font color="#0F0F99">z</font><font color="#0F0FCC">L</font><font color="#0F0FFF">a</font><font color="#2F2FFF">w</font><font color="#4E50FF">y</font><font color="#6E70FF">e</font><font color="#8E90FF">r</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 18:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277126 +++$+++ Poppypetty +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277125 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.156123800E09 +++$+++ Finally, I am sorry to say that, but I think that you (and people in general) should only edit articles on topic they know a little bit. Have you been to these islands ? Furthermore, the North-American point of view (with a very specific notion of ethnicity, nation and religion) ISN'T the neutral point of view.  +++$+++ ::::::Finally, I am sorry to say that, but I think that you (and people in general) should only edit articles on topic they know a little bit. Have you been to these islands ? Furthermore, the North-American point of view (with a very specific notion of ethnicity, nation and religion) ISN'T the neutral point of view. [[User:Poppypetty|Poppypetty]] 18:30, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277127 +++$+++ Poppypetty +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277124 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.156124040E09 +++$+++ OK, let's three Indians, four Americans, two Canadians and two Japanese decide if Guadeloupe has a national team or only a ''regional'' team. The democratic way would be much better. I am quite sure of the outcome of this one (but let's go for it anyway).  +++$+++ :::::OK, let's three Indians, four Americans, two Canadians and two Japanese decide if Guadeloupe has a national team or only a ''regional'' team. The democratic way would be much better. I am quite sure of the outcome of this one (but let's go for it anyway). [[User:Poppypetty|Poppypetty]] 18:34, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277128 +++$+++ Poppypetty +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277127 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.156124100E09 +++$+++ By the way, did I mention that these guys will likely not speak French ? It's quite embarrassing ...  +++$+++ ::::::By the way, did I mention that these guys will likely not speak French ? It's quite embarrassing ... [[User:Poppypetty|Poppypetty]] 18:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277129 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.156124460E09 +++$+++ I don't know what else we could do.  Do you want to be in a constant edit war?  As for your question about Guadeloupe and Martinique being nations byt not England and Wales, I never said that I would want the French ones over the British ones.  In fact, I do not consider that Guadeloupe or Martinique are nations.  Since they're integral parts of France, in the same way that England and Wales are integral parts of the United Kingdom, they are not nations I (actually, let's use \"countries\", since it's a better term). New Caledonia, French Polynesia and Wallis and Futuna, however, are a different matter.  As non-integral parts of France, and in a sense, more \"foreign possessions\", they have somewhat more of a right for self-determination, and more of an identity outside of France.  In the British sphere, Bermuda and Gibraltar would fit the bill.  In Denmark, the Faroes and Greenland.  Non-integral parts of nations, which ''should be'' decolonized are what you could consider \"countries\". <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ :I don't know what else we could do.  Do you want to be in a constant edit war?  As for your question about Guadeloupe and Martinique being nations byt not England and Wales, I never said that I would want the French ones over the British ones.  In fact, I do not consider that Guadeloupe or Martinique are nations.  Since they're integral parts of France, in the same way that England and Wales are integral parts of the United Kingdom, they are not nations I (actually, let's use "countries", since it's a better term). New Caledonia, French Polynesia and Wallis and Futuna, however, are a different matter.  As non-integral parts of France, and in a sense, more "foreign possessions", they have somewhat more of a right for self-determination, and more of an identity outside of France.  In the British sphere, Bermuda and Gibraltar would fit the bill.  In Denmark, the Faroes and Greenland.  Non-integral parts of nations, which ''should be'' decolonized are what you could consider "countries". <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="#0F0F77">O</font><font color="#0F0F99">z</font><font color="#0F0FCC">L</font><font color="#0F0FFF">a</font><font color="#2F2FFF">w</font><font color="#4E50FF">y</font><font color="#6E70FF">e</font><font color="#8E90FF">r</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 18:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
277130 +++$+++ Poppypetty +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277115 +++$+++ 277129 +++$+++ 2006-08-20 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.156126500E09 +++$+++ I accepted it because I thought we could really be in an edit war if we both stand on our point of views (I am creating the request and you can answer after that). I personally don't make any difference between Martinique and Guadeloupe and the others. They are close or far but they all have the right to self-determination and independence if they want to. In my opinion, all these territories are former colonies which decide to stay integral parts of France (which is a little bit different from \"foreign possessions\"). They mostly (with exceptions in New Caledonia and a little bit in Polynesia) consider themselves as French (and let's be realistic they are economically interested in staying French). What is a little bit sad is to see that every time there is a discussion about a French overseas territories, it comes to the point that this is a nation which should be ''free''. While this is a nice picture (perhaps due to the fact that most contributors come from countries which didn't have any colonies or where colonized themselves : USA, Canada, India), it's far to be the truth. Just ask people from Mayotte how happy they are to choose to stay French instead of voting for independence as the other island from Comores. Anyway, this a  topic we could discuss for hours. What is really bothering me is this tendency from Wikipedia to re-write history and facts this way (and more generally the American way) ? This is very sad and one of the reasons why I chose to contribute mostly to the French wikipedia instead of trying to create a wonderful wikipedia in English and then translate it in other languages (To be fair, we have the same problem in the French wikipedia, where Belgians, Swiss and etc find that the French POV is presented too often as the reference ;-) ).  +++$+++ ::I accepted it because I thought we could really be in an edit war if we both stand on our point of views (I am creating the request and you can answer after that). I personally don't make any difference between Martinique and Guadeloupe and the others. They are close or far but they all have the right to self-determination and independence if they want to. In my opinion, all these territories are former colonies which decide to stay integral parts of France (which is a little bit different from "foreign possessions"). They mostly (with exceptions in New Caledonia and a little bit in Polynesia) consider themselves as French (and let's be realistic they are economically interested in staying French). What is a little bit sad is to see that every time there is a discussion about a French overseas territories, it comes to the point that this is a nation which should be ''free''. While this is a nice picture (perhaps due to the fact that most contributors come from countries which didn't have any colonies or where colonized themselves : USA, Canada, India), it's far to be the truth. Just ask people from Mayotte how happy they are to choose to stay French instead of voting for independence as the other island from Comores. Anyway, this a  topic we could discuss for hours. What is really bothering me is this tendency from Wikipedia to re-write history and facts this way (and more generally the American way) ? This is very sad and one of the reasons why I chose to contribute mostly to the French wikipedia instead of trying to create a wonderful wikipedia in English and then translate it in other languages (To be fair, we have the same problem in the French wikipedia, where Belgians, Swiss and etc find that the French POV is presented too often as the reference ;-) ). [[User:Poppypetty|Poppypetty]] 19:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

14972 +++$+++ Bine Mai +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14972 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-20 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.292909940E09 +++$+++ Could you please tell me how many football player articles you have created so far? Thank you in advance.  +++$+++ Could you please tell me how many football player articles you have created so far? Thank you in advance. [[User:Bine Mai|<font color="#0000FF">'''Bine'''</font>]][[User talk:Bine Mai|<font color="#FF0000">'''Mai'''</font>]] 21:39, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
14973 +++$+++ Bine Mai +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14972 +++$+++ 14972 +++$+++ 2010-12-20 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.292913960E09 +++$+++ WOW! That's impressive.  +++$+++ *WOW! That's impressive. [[User:Bine Mai|<font color="#0000FF">'''Bine'''</font>]][[User talk:Bine Mai|<font color="#FF0000">'''Mai'''</font>]] 22:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

570474 +++$+++ Mankash +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570474 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-12 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.218603900E09 +++$+++ Hej David. Jag har snott skaml\xf6st av dig n\xe4r jag tillverkade [[:Image:Olympic torch current event.svg]] och [[:Image:Olympics current event.svg]]. Tycker du att jag har gjort n\xe5got fel (licens, allm\xe4nt fusk eller n\xe5got annat), h\xf6r helst av dig p\xe5 min [[:sv:Anv\xe4ndardiskussion:Mankash|svenska sida]]. Jag kollar inte h\xe4r s\xe5 ofta. Mvh \/\/  +++$+++ Hej David. Jag har snott skamlöst av dig när jag tillverkade [[:Image:Olympic torch current event.svg]] och [[:Image:Olympics current event.svg]]. Tycker du att jag har gjort något fel (licens, allmänt fusk eller något annat), hör helst av dig på min [[:sv:Användardiskussion:Mankash|svenska sida]]. Jag kollar inte här så ofta. Mvh // [[User:Mankash|Mankash]] ([[User talk:Mankash|talk]]) 22:05, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
570475 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570474 +++$+++ 570474 +++$+++ 2008-08-13 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.218630300E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 05:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

541699 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-16 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.213618260E09 +++$+++ Psst, [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation\/Kender|you're a little late to the party]].  ;)  Eventually, he did agree to do mediation with us, and has been involved for about 6 weeks now. I've been working on the Kender trimming part, but been busy for a few days. I plan to get back to it again starting tomorrow, god willing! :) I'm hoping to not have to do any arbitration in the future, because one of the main complaints people had against him was incivility, and he's been quite a bit nicer for the last few weeks, and I'm hoping very badly that it stays that way!  +++$+++ Psst, [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Kender|you're a little late to the party]].  ;)  Eventually, he did agree to do mediation with us, and has been involved for about 6 weeks now. I've been working on the Kender trimming part, but been busy for a few days. I plan to get back to it again starting tomorrow, god willing! :) I'm hoping to not have to do any arbitration in the future, because one of the main complaints people had against him was incivility, and he's been quite a bit nicer for the last few weeks, and I'm hoping very badly that it stays that way! [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 05:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
541700 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541699 +++$+++ 541699 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.213651680E09 +++$+++ Oh yeah, looks like I didn't pay any attention to the date on that.  Sorry.  I was in a bit of a time crunch, and had to leave the house, so I probably didn't read it as carefully as I should have.   +++$+++ :Oh yeah, looks like I didn't pay any attention to the date on that.  Sorry.  I was in a bit of a time crunch, and had to leave the house, so I probably didn't read it as carefully as I should have.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 14:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
541701 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541699 +++$+++ 541700 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.213659120E09 +++$+++ No problem - you can watch how it's been playing out at your leisure. There have been rough patches (like there is right now, which began after I left you the above more-optimistic note), but when we have worked together, it's been better than it ever was before - more actual collaberation and less confrontation.  +++$+++ ::No problem - you can watch how it's been playing out at your leisure. There have been rough patches (like there is right now, which began after I left you the above more-optimistic note), but when we have worked together, it's been better than it ever was before - more actual collaberation and less confrontation. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 16:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

14977 +++$+++ Eldumpo +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-11 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.297451460E09 +++$+++ Hi Jo, I'm not sure if you saw this thread [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football\/Archive_51#Atlante_UTN_and_Venados_de_Yucat.C3.A1n] at the time, but I was wondering if you are able to provide any input to the query, as I believe I have seen you active on North American football in the past. Just to clarify matters, Merida's article states that their nickname is ''Venados'' and the city is in Yucatan, so you would think logically there is some link with the new Venados de Yuacatan franchise, except both Merida and Atlante II (aka Venados) are listed in the same league at Soccerway this season. Regards.  +++$+++ Hi Jo, I'm not sure if you saw this thread [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_51#Atlante_UTN_and_Venados_de_Yucat.C3.A1n] at the time, but I was wondering if you are able to provide any input to the query, as I believe I have seen you active on North American football in the past. Just to clarify matters, Merida's article states that their nickname is ''Venados'' and the city is in Yucatan, so you would think logically there is some link with the new Venados de Yuacatan franchise, except both Merida and Atlante II (aka Venados) are listed in the same league at Soccerway this season. Regards. [[User:Eldumpo|Eldumpo]] ([[User talk:Eldumpo|talk]]) 11:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
14978 +++$+++ Eldumpo +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14977 +++$+++ 14977 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.297739520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for responding on this. I have gone through some of the Spanish-language sources, together with the season results at RSSSF, and it seems the two 2nd level franchises effectively swapped owners\/filials. I have added some text to the Merida and Atlante UTN articles, although the latter may need more, and I need to confirm where that side are now playing. On a related note, have you see this table [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/2010_Liga_de_Ascenso_Apertura#Stadia_and_locations], and in particular the \"fb\" templates within it which make it difficult to make changes. Are you aware of the rationale of such a table, and do you know how to edit it? Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks for responding on this. I have gone through some of the Spanish-language sources, together with the season results at RSSSF, and it seems the two 2nd level franchises effectively swapped owners/filials. I have added some text to the Merida and Atlante UTN articles, although the latter may need more, and I need to confirm where that side are now playing. On a related note, have you see this table [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Liga_de_Ascenso_Apertura#Stadia_and_locations], and in particular the "fb" templates within it which make it difficult to make changes. Are you aware of the rationale of such a table, and do you know how to edit it? Thanks. [[User:Eldumpo|Eldumpo]] ([[User talk:Eldumpo|talk]]) 19:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

539268 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-18 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.179520320E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0430 \u0444\u043b\u043e\u0442\u0430 \u0442\u044a\u0440\u0441\u0438\u0445 \u0432 \u041d\u0430\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0431\u0438\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043e\u0442\u0435\u043a\u0430, \u043d\u043e \u043d\u0438\u0449\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043d\u044f\u043c\u0430... \u0416\u0430\u043b\u043a\u043e. \u0414\u0430\u043d\u043e \u043f\u044a\u043a \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u044f \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0430\u0434\u0435. -- +++$+++ За флота търсих в Народната библиотека, но нищо не няма... Жалко. Дано пък намеря другаде. --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 13:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
539269 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539268 +++$+++ 539268 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.179537300E09 +++$+++ \u0415\u0442\u043e \u0433\u0438: [http:\/\/www.pbase.com\/ngruev\/image\/27151120], [http:\/\/www.pbase.com\/ngruev\/image\/27151131], [http:\/\/www.pbase.com\/ngruev\/image\/27435697], [http:\/\/www.pbase.com\/ngruev\/image\/20752995], [http:\/\/www.pbase.com\/ngruev\/image\/60115445], [http:\/\/www.pbase.com\/ngruev\/image\/72201220], [http:\/\/www.pbase.com\/ngruev\/image\/71247329], [http:\/\/www.pbase.com\/ngruev\/image\/71247347]. \u0422\u0440\u044f\u0431\u0432\u0430\u0448\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u0441\u0435\u0442\u044f, \u0447\u0435 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0430 \u0435 \u043f\u043e-\u043b\u0435\u0441\u043d\u043e : ) -- +++$+++ : Ето ги: [http://www.pbase.com/ngruev/image/27151120], [http://www.pbase.com/ngruev/image/27151131], [http://www.pbase.com/ngruev/image/27435697], [http://www.pbase.com/ngruev/image/20752995], [http://www.pbase.com/ngruev/image/60115445], [http://www.pbase.com/ngruev/image/72201220], [http://www.pbase.com/ngruev/image/71247329], [http://www.pbase.com/ngruev/image/71247347]. Трябваше да се сетя, че така е по-лесно : ) --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 18:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
539270 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539268 +++$+++ 539269 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.179604200E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0439 \u043f\u0430\u043a! \u041c\u043e\u0436\u0435 \u043b\u0438 \u043f\u043e \u043d\u044f\u043a\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0448 \u0442\u0435\u043c\u043f\u043b\u0435\u0439\u0442 \u043d\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0432 \u0421\u043e\u0444\u0438\u044f-\u0433\u0440\u0430\u0434? \u0429\u0435 \u0431\u044a\u0434\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0437\u043d\u043e \u0441\u0438 \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u044f. \u0418 \u0437\u0430\u0449\u043e \u043d\u044f\u043a\u043e\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u043d\u043a\u0438 \u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438 \u043e\u0442 \u0431\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0443\u0438\u043a\u0438\u043f\u0435\u0434\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0442 \u0442\u0443\u043a? -- +++$+++ ::Здравей пак! Може ли по някое време да направиш темплейт на общините в София-град? Ще бъде доста полезно си мисля. И защо някои картинки и карти от българската уикипедия не стават тук? --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 12:50, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
539271 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539268 +++$+++ 539270 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.179610860E09 +++$+++ \u0422\u043e\u0447\u043d\u043e \u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e Sofia Province, \u043e\u0431\u0430\u0447\u0435 \u0432\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043e \u0431\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e \u0437\u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u043e\u0438 \u0433\u0435\u0440\u0431\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0421\u043e\u0444\u0438\u044f : ) -- +++$+++ :::Точно като Sofia Province, обаче вместо българското знаме да стои герба на София : ) --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 14:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

14983 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-20 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.300682400E09 +++$+++ Oh Jogurney, I\xb4m sorry for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Zoran_Radosavljevi%C4%87&action=history this] edit sumary. I didn\xb4t checked it was you who did the article, and I suposed some local guy added his nickname, sorry :( . But you need to know that \"''Zuba''\" is quite negative nickname, meaning \"''toothsome''\", or \"''big tooth''\", so I doubt the guy enjoyed the nickname... Hey, I also remembered that you can easily add the nationality cat (Serbian, Croatian, Montenegrin, etc. footballer) that way more easily found in the cats. You can just check guys birthplace, and mosly you\xb4ll have it right, if not someone else would correct it, no prob. Sorry for this \"''toothy''\", allways yours :) best regards,  +++$+++ Oh Jogurney, I´m sorry for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zoran_Radosavljevi%C4%87&action=history this] edit sumary. I didn´t checked it was you who did the article, and I suposed some local guy added his nickname, sorry :( . But you need to know that "''Zuba''" is quite negative nickname, meaning "''toothsome''", or "''big tooth''", so I doubt the guy enjoyed the nickname... Hey, I also remembered that you can easily add the nationality cat (Serbian, Croatian, Montenegrin, etc. footballer) that way more easily found in the cats. You can just check guys birthplace, and mosly you´ll have it right, if not someone else would correct it, no prob. Sorry for this "''toothy''", allways yours :) best regards, [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 21:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
14984 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14983 +++$+++ 14983 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.300683960E09 +++$+++ Yes, I know, the minorities and wrong borders, quite a Yugoslav issue. I\xb4ll try to help on the articles I see around. I had noteced that you have been for some time now making many articles about Yugoslav guys who played in Greece, and most, except the best ones, were just without article here. I used recently the RSSSF list of foreign players in Greece and listed all the ones related with Yugoslavia and searched their careers for the ones that didn\xb4t had article, thus notecing that many didn\xb4t had. I basically did it because I was searching for other ex-Yu players that played in FR Yugoslav league during the 1990s, so I have it listed on paper somewhere in my room (my room is a natural disaster, so I\xb4ll find it some day...). I also use the \"cyrillic\" adition as knowing which articles I checked, and which I didn\xb4t.  +++$+++ :Yes, I know, the minorities and wrong borders, quite a Yugoslav issue. I´ll try to help on the articles I see around. I had noteced that you have been for some time now making many articles about Yugoslav guys who played in Greece, and most, except the best ones, were just without article here. I used recently the RSSSF list of foreign players in Greece and listed all the ones related with Yugoslavia and searched their careers for the ones that didn´t had article, thus notecing that many didn´t had. I basically did it because I was searching for other ex-Yu players that played in FR Yugoslav league during the 1990s, so I have it listed on paper somewhere in my room (my room is a natural disaster, so I´ll find it some day...). I also use the "cyrillic" adition as knowing which articles I checked, and which I didn´t. [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 22:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
14985 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14983 +++$+++ 14983 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.300684260E09 +++$+++ Hey Jogurney, just a question, I hope you don\xb4t mind me messing your stuff around, but, Have you been updating your [[User:Jogurney\/List|list]]? You know, I grew up in M\xe9xico... tequilla, and stuff. :)  +++$+++ :Hey Jogurney, just a question, I hope you don´t mind me messing your stuff around, but, Have you been updating your [[User:Jogurney/List|list]]? You know, I grew up in México... tequilla, and stuff. :) [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 22:11, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

439404 +++$+++ Jeffpw +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 439404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-18 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.195420140E09 +++$+++ [[WP:ANI#King James I of England|This scintillating discussion]] has set the tone for my entire day.  +++$+++ [[WP:ANI#King James I of England|This scintillating discussion]] has set the tone for my entire day. [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] ([[User talk:Jeffpw|talk]]) 13:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
439405 +++$+++  +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 439404 +++$+++ 439404 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.195420620E09 +++$+++ Hey, Moreschi read it. That's one for three. Pretty good for Wikipedia. Page protection will come down soon enough. I've got breakfast and coffee to attend to, but if you can't get an audience, I'll see about talking to the mentioned editors later. \xb7\xb7[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=\" font-variant: small-caps\" >l<\/span>a]][[ user talk: coelacan |can]] 13:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :Hey, Moreschi read it. That's one for three. Pretty good for Wikipedia. Page protection will come down soon enough. I've got breakfast and coffee to attend to, but if you can't get an audience, I'll see about talking to the mentioned editors later. ··[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=" font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>a]][[ user talk: coelacan |can]] 13:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
439406 +++$+++ Jeffpw +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 439404 +++$+++ 439405 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.195427040E09 +++$+++ Was your breakfast good? I had cookies and a coke for breakfast and enjoyed it to no end. I'm having a pork roast for dinner, and can't wait to eat it. Good nutrition is highly important (speaking as a nurse).  +++$+++ ::Was your breakfast good? I had cookies and a coke for breakfast and enjoyed it to no end. I'm having a pork roast for dinner, and can't wait to eat it. Good nutrition is highly important (speaking as a nurse). [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] ([[User talk:Jeffpw|talk]]) 15:04, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
439407 +++$+++  +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 439404 +++$+++ 439406 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.195428000E09 +++$+++ Not much in the house: peanut butter, oversweetened juice, leftover spinach. Very sad. \xb7\xb7[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=\" font-variant: small-caps\" >l<\/span>a]][[ user talk: coelacan |can]] 15:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :::Not much in the house: peanut butter, oversweetened juice, leftover spinach. Very sad. ··[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=" font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>a]][[ user talk: coelacan |can]] 15:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
439408 +++$+++ Jeffpw +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 439404 +++$+++ 439407 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.195433280E09 +++$+++ I bet [[Gordon Ramsay]] could make a festive meal out of such ingredients, dear. Never say die! If you truly get desperate, almost everybody has a little tinned fish stashed away somewhere...or do you consider that cannibalism?  +++$+++ ::::I bet [[Gordon Ramsay]] could make a festive meal out of such ingredients, dear. Never say die! If you truly get desperate, almost everybody has a little tinned fish stashed away somewhere...or do you consider that cannibalism? [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] ([[User talk:Jeffpw|talk]]) 16:48, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
439409 +++$+++  +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 439404 +++$+++ 439408 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.195464120E09 +++$+++ Ya, [http:\/\/infoshop.org\/page\/The-Anarchist-Cookbook I don't eat my cousins.] I'm a bit surprised, but in retrospect I suspect the \"wp:dr is that way\" reflex was triggered by actually mentioning that there was content at the root of the problem. Maybe in the future a more sparse \"could some admin leave a friendly reminder?\" would get the desired response without triggering the wp:dr reflex. I really don't know. \xb7\xb7[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=\" font-variant: small-caps\" >l<\/span>a]][[ user talk: coelacan |can]] 01:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :::::Ya, [http://infoshop.org/page/The-Anarchist-Cookbook I don't eat my cousins.] I'm a bit surprised, but in retrospect I suspect the "wp:dr is that way" reflex was triggered by actually mentioning that there was content at the root of the problem. Maybe in the future a more sparse "could some admin leave a friendly reminder?" would get the desired response without triggering the wp:dr reflex. I really don't know. ··[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=" font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>a]][[ user talk: coelacan |can]] 01:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
439410 +++$+++ Jeffpw +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 439404 +++$+++ 439409 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.195481040E09 +++$+++ Or maybe the involved administrators who had such difficulty comprehending my post could instead edit the Simple Wikipedia or take Barbara Bush up on her 1990's offer of help learning to read.  +++$+++ ::::::Or maybe the involved administrators who had such difficulty comprehending my post could instead edit the Simple Wikipedia or take Barbara Bush up on her 1990's offer of help learning to read. [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] ([[User talk:Jeffpw|talk]]) 06:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

14986 +++$+++ Argyle 4 Life +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14986 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-21 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.300701600E09 +++$+++ Hello. Last month, you helped me when I asked about sources for [[Nuno Mendes (footballer)|Nuno Mendes]]. You found a useful link on FPF and said you might be able to [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football\/Archive_51#Portuguese_football_sources|manipulate the entry to get prior years]]. Well, I nominated the article for GA status and it has just [[Talk:Nuno Mendes (footballer)\/GA1|received a review]] which it is agonisingly close to passing. Unless it can be demonstrated that ForaDeJogo is a reliable source then I'll have to replace most, if not all, of the references to it. The link you found for the 2010\u201311 season is a big help and I was hoping that you could find his statistics for 2008\u201309 and 2009\u201310? There are a few more from earlier in his career, but I might just have to cut down the detail if I can't find a reliable source that confirms he played in a match on a certain date. The records on LPFP only seem to go back as far as 2004\u201305. Thanks in advance.  +++$+++ Hello. Last month, you helped me when I asked about sources for [[Nuno Mendes (footballer)|Nuno Mendes]]. You found a useful link on FPF and said you might be able to [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_51#Portuguese_football_sources|manipulate the entry to get prior years]]. Well, I nominated the article for GA status and it has just [[Talk:Nuno Mendes (footballer)/GA1|received a review]] which it is agonisingly close to passing. Unless it can be demonstrated that ForaDeJogo is a reliable source then I'll have to replace most, if not all, of the references to it. The link you found for the 2010–11 season is a big help and I was hoping that you could find his statistics for 2008–09 and 2009–10? There are a few more from earlier in his career, but I might just have to cut down the detail if I can't find a reliable source that confirms he played in a match on a certain date. The records on LPFP only seem to go back as far as 2004–05. Thanks in advance. [[User:Argyle 4 Life|<font style="color:#014421;">'''Argyle 4 Life'''</font>]][[User talk:Argyle 4 Life|<font style="color:#4863A0;"><sup>'''talk'''</sup></font>]] 03:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
14987 +++$+++ Argyle 4 Life +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14986 +++$+++ 14986 +++$+++ 2011-03-22 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.300779480E09 +++$+++ Thank you for trying, it's appreciated. It does seem odd that there isn't an archive, maybe there will be one day, but if I can't find anything then I'll just have to cut out some detail for it to pass. The page you did find is a great help because it officially proves that he is playing for Gondomar.  +++$+++ :Thank you for trying, it's appreciated. It does seem odd that there isn't an archive, maybe there will be one day, but if I can't find anything then I'll just have to cut out some detail for it to pass. The page you did find is a great help because it officially proves that he is playing for Gondomar. [[User:Argyle 4 Life|<font style="color:#014421;">'''Argyle 4 Life'''</font>]][[User talk:Argyle 4 Life|<font style="color:#4863A0;"><sup>'''talk'''</sup></font>]] 00:38, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
14988 +++$+++ Argyle 4 Life +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14986 +++$+++ 14987 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.300900920E09 +++$+++ It passed thanks to your effort in finding out what they do to ensure that the information is accurate and providing evidence of a newspaper using it as a source, so I think one of these is required.  +++$+++ ::It passed thanks to your effort in finding out what they do to ensure that the information is accurate and providing evidence of a newspaper using it as a source, so I think one of these is required. [[User:Argyle 4 Life|<font style="color:#014421;">'''Argyle 4 Life'''</font>]][[User talk:Argyle 4 Life|<font style="color:#4863A0;"><sup>'''talk'''</sup></font>]] 10:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

277132 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-22 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.156278600E09 +++$+++ I excised a chunk of text from this article you created that I suspect is vandalism.  The contributor (205.250.191.7) has a [[User talk:205.250.191.7|vandalism notice on his talk page]], and I cannot confirm the additions as true even though I have lived in Brampton all my life.  If you have other information confirming it, feel free to add it back again. <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ I excised a chunk of text from this article you created that I suspect is vandalism.  The contributor (205.250.191.7) has a [[User talk:205.250.191.7|vandalism notice on his talk page]], and I cannot confirm the additions as true even though I have lived in Brampton all my life.  If you have other information confirming it, feel free to add it back again. <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="#0F0F77">O</font><font color="#0F0F99">z</font><font color="#0F0FCC">L</font><font color="#0F0FFF">a</font><font color="#2F2FFF">w</font><font color="#4E50FF">y</font><font color="#6E70FF">e</font><font color="#8E90FF">r</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 13:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
277133 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277132 +++$+++ 277132 +++$+++ 2006-08-22 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.156285560E09 +++$+++ My parents substansiate the suggestions, so I presume they are true. I might be able to confirm this with the management at some point, but until then, I've put <nowiki>{{fact}}<\/nowiki>.  --   +++$+++ : My parents substansiate the suggestions, so I presume they are true. I might be able to confirm this with the management at some point, but until then, I've put <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki>.  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 15:26, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
277134 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277132 +++$+++ 277133 +++$+++ 2006-08-22 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.156285800E09 +++$+++ Wow.  I don't have the greatest memory, but it must ''really'' be failing me now.  I was born in 77, so I would assume I'd remember waterslides up until \"the late 1980s\". <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ ::Wow.  I don't have the greatest memory, but it must ''really'' be failing me now.  I was born in 77, so I would assume I'd remember waterslides up until "the late 1980s". <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="#0F0F77">O</font><font color="#0F0F99">z</font><font color="#0F0FCC">L</font><font color="#0F0FFF">a</font><font color="#2F2FFF">w</font><font color="#4E50FF">y</font><font color="#6E70FF">e</font><font color="#8E90FF">r</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 15:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
277135 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277132 +++$+++ 277134 +++$+++ 2006-08-22 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.156286220E09 +++$+++ I've posted the email I sent to the article's talk page. Did you go to Shoppers regularly, or were you a Bramalea resident? It might only have been for a few years...  --   +++$+++ ::: I've posted the email I sent to the article's talk page. Did you go to Shoppers regularly, or were you a Bramalea resident? It might only have been for a few years...  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 15:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
277136 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277132 +++$+++ 277135 +++$+++ 2006-08-22 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.156286700E09 +++$+++ I dont know how regularly I went, but no, I didnt live in Bramalea.  Probably still went to BCC more often, since Shoppers World was pretty grungy back then. It could very likely be that my mind is screwing with me, and there were waterslides (and maybe I even played on them once or twice)! =) <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ ::::I dont know how regularly I went, but no, I didnt live in Bramalea.  Probably still went to BCC more often, since Shoppers World was pretty grungy back then. It could very likely be that my mind is screwing with me, and there were waterslides (and maybe I even played on them once or twice)! =) <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="#0F0F77">O</font><font color="#0F0F99">z</font><font color="#0F0FCC">L</font><font color="#0F0FFF">a</font><font color="#2F2FFF">w</font><font color="#4E50FF">y</font><font color="#6E70FF">e</font><font color="#8E90FF">r</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 15:45, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

570477 +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-15 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.218868500E09 +++$+++ In short, your method is not universally loved and\/or admired, and if the template doesn't need it per high inclusion rates for a template per the original [[WP:DPP]] rationale we worked out, I certainly have gone away from using it. I support it, in short, where and when necessary, and not farther. Perhaps you should do the same. \/\/ <b> +++$+++ In short, your method is not universally loved and/or admired, and if the template doesn't need it per high inclusion rates for a template per the original [[WP:DPP]] rationale we worked out, I certainly have gone away from using it. I support it, in short, where and when necessary, and not farther. Perhaps you should do the same. // <b>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</b><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 23:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
570478 +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570477 +++$+++ 570477 +++$+++ 2008-08-16 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.218876960E09 +++$+++ Your depreciation note was hardly helpful[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3AUsage_div&diff=232191685&oldid=232187126]... a formatting template is a formatting template... there is no requirement it be used in usage. The name just keeps it memorable to me! I trust you can live with the cat changes... no doubt some other busybody will come along and F*** with that someday too. \/\/ <b> +++$+++ :Your depreciation note was hardly helpful[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AUsage_div&diff=232191685&oldid=232187126]... a formatting template is a formatting template... there is no requirement it be used in usage. The name just keeps it memorable to me! I trust you can live with the cat changes... no doubt some other busybody will come along and F*** with that someday too. // <b>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</b><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 01:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

14993 +++$+++ Tooga +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310329200E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion\/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Tooga|Tooga]] - <small>[[User talk:Tooga|BØRK!]]</small> 13:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
14994 +++$+++ Tooga +++$+++ Jogurney +++$+++ 14993 +++$+++ 14993 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.310851800E09 +++$+++ Hi Jogurney. No need to apologize considering the amazing amount of work you've done to eliminate unreferenced BLPs. I was mainly looking for references confirming that he had played in a professional league, and simply missed the one stating he had played for the national team. This does indeed make him notable per [[WP:NFOOTBALL]]. Cheers  +++$+++ :Hi Jogurney. No need to apologize considering the amazing amount of work you've done to eliminate unreferenced BLPs. I was mainly looking for references confirming that he had played in a professional league, and simply missed the one stating he had played for the national team. This does indeed make him notable per [[WP:NFOOTBALL]]. Cheers [[User:Tooga|Tooga]] - <small>[[User talk:Tooga|BØRK!]]</small> 14:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

277140 +++$+++ Tony Fox +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277140 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-28 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.156751460E09 +++$+++ As one of the more involved folks around here, you might want to weigh in on the discussion at [[WP:AN#Community ban on User:WikiWoo?]] - wasn't sure if anyone had pointed it out to you yet.  +++$+++ As one of the more involved folks around here, you might want to weigh in on the discussion at [[WP:AN#Community ban on User:WikiWoo?]] - wasn't sure if anyone had pointed it out to you yet. [[User:Tony Fox|Tony Fox]] <small>[[User_talk:Tony Fox|(arf!)]]</small> 00:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
277141 +++$+++ Tony Fox +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277140 +++$+++ 277140 +++$+++ 2006-08-28 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.156752420E09 +++$+++ You make a good point. I'm personally just offering information where necessary to try and get a solution to the situation.  +++$+++ :You make a good point. I'm personally just offering information where necessary to try and get a solution to the situation. [[User:Tony Fox|Tony Fox]] <small>[[User_talk:Tony Fox|(arf!)]]</small> 01:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

277142 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.157054880E09 +++$+++ I just semi-protected [[West Ham United F.C.]] after a string of IP vandalism-like edits.  Since I see you have edited the page before, do you want to check the page now to make sure that the recent changes have not included any inaccuracies?  Thanks. \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ I just semi-protected [[West Ham United F.C.]] after a string of IP vandalism-like edits.  Since I see you have edited the page before, do you want to check the page now to make sure that the recent changes have not included any inaccuracies?  Thanks. —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 13:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
277143 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277142 +++$+++ 277142 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.157055300E09 +++$+++ OK, no problem, I'll ask someone else :-) \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ :OK, no problem, I'll ask someone else :-) —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 13:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

539289 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-06 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.181151060E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0439! \u0411\u0438 \u043b\u0438 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f \u043a\u044a\u043c \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430 {{Template:Middle Ages}}? \u041d\u0430\u0439-\u0434\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0435 \u0449\u0435 \u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u0432\u0438\u0436\u0434\u0430 \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u0418\u043c\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0438\u044f \u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u0438\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0430 \u043a\u044a\u043c \u0434\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0446\u0430\u0440\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430: ) \u041d\u044f\u043c\u0430\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0449\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0435. \u0411\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u044f: ) -- +++$+++ Здравей! Би ли добавил България към това {{Template:Middle Ages}}? Най-добре ще е да се вижда Българска Империя и да извежда към двете царства: ) Нямам представа как ще стане. Благодаря: ) --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 10:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
539290 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539289 +++$+++ 539289 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.181501580E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438! \u0410\u043a\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u0441\u0435 \u043b\u044a\u0436\u0430 \u0431\u0435\u0448\u0435 \u0441\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u043b \u043d\u0435\u0449\u043e \u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e \u0437\u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435 (\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0433\u0435\u0440\u0431) \u043d\u0430 \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f, \u043d\u043e \u0441\u0435\u0433\u0430 \u043d\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0433\u043e \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u044f, \u0431\u0438 \u043b\u0438 \u043c\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u043b \u043b\u0438\u043d\u043a\u0430 \u043a\u044a\u043c \u043d\u0435\u0433\u043e? \u0417\u0430\u0449\u043e \u043d\u0435\u0449\u043e \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u0421\u0430\u043c\u0443\u0438\u043b \u0441\u0435 \u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0446\u0430\u043a\u0430\u043b\u0430 \u0438\u043c\u0430 \u043b\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u0447\u0438\u043d \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438? \u041c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043b\u0438 \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u044f\u0442 \u0441\u0445\u0435\u043c\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0431\u0438\u0442\u043a\u0438\u0442\u0435? \u0414\u0430 \u043d\u0435 \u0442\u0435 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0430\u043c \u0432\u0441\u0435\u043a\u0438 \u043f\u044a\u0442 \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0448 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043d\u0438 \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0438, \u0441\u0438\u0433\u0443\u0440\u043d\u043e \u0442\u0438 \u0435 \u043e\u043c\u0440\u044a\u0437\u043d\u0430\u043b\u043e : ) \u0410\u043a\u043e \u043f\u044a\u043a \u043d\u0435 - \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430 \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0438 \u0438\u043c\u0430... : )-- +++$+++ :Здрасти! Ако не се лъжа беше свалил нещо като средновековно знаме (или герб) на България, но сега не мога да го намеря, би ли ми пратил линка към него? Защо нещо картата на страната при Самуил се е прецакала има ли начин да се оправи? Много ли сложно да се правят схеми на битките? Да не те карам всеки път да правиш разни работи, сигурно ти е омръзнало : ) Ако пък не - доста работи има... : )--[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 11:53, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
539291 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539289 +++$+++ 539289 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.181522160E09 +++$+++ \u0414\u0430, \u0437\u0430 \u043e\u043d\u0437\u0438 \u043e\u0442 14 \u0432\u0435\u043a \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0432\u044a\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 : ) \u041c\u043e\u0436\u0435 \u043b\u0438 \u043f\u043e \u043d\u044f\u043a\u0430\u043a\u044a\u0432 \u043d\u0430\u0447\u0438\u043d \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u0438\u0437\u0440\u0435\u0436\u0435 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e \u043a\u0440\u044a\u0433\u0430, \u0437\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0433\u043e \u0441\u043b\u0430\u0433\u0430\u043c\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u0431\u0438\u0442\u043a\u0438 \u0438 \u0442. \u043d.? \u0410\u043a\u043e \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435, \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438 \u0433\u043e. \u041b\u043e\u0448\u043e\u0442\u043e \u0435, \u0447\u0435 \u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043e \u043e\u0442 \u0430\u0440\u0430\u0431\u0438 \u0438 \u043d\u0435 \u0435 \u0432 \u043d\u0430\u0448 \u0441\u0442\u0438\u043b, \u043d\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u043c \u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0449\u0435 \u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0445\u043e\u0434\u044f\u0449\u043e \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043c\u0435 \u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044f \u0433\u0435\u0440\u0431, \u043e\u0442 1595 \u0437\u0430 \u0433\u0435\u0440\u0431 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0432\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0434\u044a\u0440\u0436\u0430\u0432\u0430. \u0425\u0443\u0431\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0431\u0438 \u0431\u0438\u043b\u043e \u0434\u0430 \u0438\u043c\u0430 \u0441\u0445\u0435\u043c\u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u041a\u043b\u044e\u0447 \u0438 \u0422\u0440\u0430\u044f\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0438 \u0432\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0430; \u043f\u044a\u043a \u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438 \u0431\u0438\u0442\u043a\u0438. \u0410 \u043f\u044a\u043a \u0430\u043a\u043e \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043c \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435 \u0442\u0440\u044f\u0431\u0432\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0438\u043c \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0437\u0430 \u0434\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0446\u0430\u0440\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0431\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0432\u0438\u0437\u0430\u043d\u0442\u0438\u044f \u0441 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043d\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0442\u0435\u043c\u043f\u043b\u0435\u0439\u0442\u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u0438\u0437\u043a\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e, \u0430\u0440\u043c\u0438\u044f, \u043b\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0443\u0440\u0430 \u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438; \u0441\u0445\u0435\u043c\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0436\u043d\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0434\u0430\u0442\u0438; \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b\u0438\u0437\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u043d\u0430 \u0442\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044f...-- +++$+++ :Да, за онзи от 14 век става въпрос : ) Може ли по някакъв начин да се изреже само кръга, за да го слагаме при битки и т. н.? Ако може, направи го. Лошото е, че е правено от араби и не е в наш стил, но не знам дали ще е подходящо да ползваме втория герб, от 1595 за герб на средновековната държава. Хубаво би било да има схеми за Ключ и Траянови врата; пък и за други битки. А пък ако намерим време трябва да подобрим статиите за двете царства на базата на византия с разните темплейти за изкуство, армия, литература и други; схема на важните дати; приблизителна територия...--[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 17:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

15004 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ BlueAg09 +++$+++ 15004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-30 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.288492260E09 +++$+++ It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article.<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-wikipage-->  +++$+++ It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article.<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-wikipage--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 19:31, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
15005 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ BlueAg09 +++$+++ 15004 +++$+++ 15004 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.288593840E09 +++$+++ It's a big no-no to do a [[Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves|cut-and-paste move]]. The history of articles is very important to the [[WP:GFDL|GFDL]]. So I'm going to have to spend about 15 minutes doing administrator actions to undo the problem. The proper way move an article is to use the move on the top. To the right of the star is a pull down box with the move option. Then the software does the history correctly. I realize that you're new here and you did do the right thing to change it to a disambiguation page. You just went about it the wrong way. I'm not mad, just telling you so that you don't do it again. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :It's a big no-no to do a [[Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves|cut-and-paste move]]. The history of articles is very important to the [[WP:GFDL|GFDL]]. So I'm going to have to spend about 15 minutes doing administrator actions to undo the problem. The proper way move an article is to use the move on the top. To the right of the star is a pull down box with the move option. Then the software does the history correctly. I realize that you're new here and you did do the right thing to change it to a disambiguation page. You just went about it the wrong way. I'm not mad, just telling you so that you don't do it again. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 23:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

277152 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-27 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.159404240E09 +++$+++ Hey Zanimum, just wondering if you ever did get a response back from Shoppers World about the existence of those waterslides. <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ Hey Zanimum, just wondering if you ever did get a response back from Shoppers World about the existence of those waterslides. <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="blue">OzLawyer</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 17:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
277153 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277152 +++$+++ 277152 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.159405500E09 +++$+++ Nothing, sadly. I've moved it to talk now.  --   +++$+++ : Nothing, sadly. I've moved it to talk now.  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 18:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

15009 +++$+++ Jenks24 +++$+++ BlueAg09 +++$+++ 15009 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-06 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.302094140E09 +++$+++ Hi there, just informing you that about 10 minutes before you created [[\u200e2010\u201311 Texas A&M Aggies women's basketball team]], [[User:Mobile Snail]] created [[2010-11 Texas A&M Aggies women's basketball team]]. While the article you created is that correct title (per [[MOS:DASH]]), the article Mobile Snail created has more content. If you don't have any objections, I'm going to merge the articles, with the article Mobile Snail created becoming the redirect (also posted at [[User talk:Mobile Snail]]. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi there, just informing you that about 10 minutes before you created [[‎2010–11 Texas A&M Aggies women's basketball team]], [[User:Mobile Snail]] created [[2010-11 Texas A&M Aggies women's basketball team]]. While the article you created is that correct title (per [[MOS:DASH]]), the article Mobile Snail created has more content. If you don't have any objections, I'm going to merge the articles, with the article Mobile Snail created becoming the redirect (also posted at [[User talk:Mobile Snail]]. Cheers, [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 05:49, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
15010 +++$+++ Jenks24 +++$+++ BlueAg09 +++$+++ 15009 +++$+++ 15009 +++$+++ 2011-04-06 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.302096360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply, I have now merged the articles.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your reply, I have now merged the articles. [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 06:26, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

15011 +++$+++ Bongomatic +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ 15011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-27 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.222548780E09 +++$+++ I will tag the article and hope that someone improves it to demonstrate and reference its notability.  +++$+++ I will tag the article and hope that someone improves it to demonstrate and reference its notability. [[User:Bongomatic|Bongomatic]] ([[User talk:Bongomatic|talk]]) 13:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
15012 +++$+++ Bongomatic +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ 15011 +++$+++ 15011 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.222550460E09 +++$+++ '''\"yellow paint\"''' (in quotes) has 262,000 hits . . . that doesn't make it notable. Not '''one''' of the hits for '''\"diana bar\"''' on the first page refers to the subject of your article.  +++$+++ :'''"yellow paint"''' (in quotes) has 262,000 hits . . . that doesn't make it notable. Not '''one''' of the hits for '''"diana bar"''' on the first page refers to the subject of your article. [[User:Bongomatic|Bongomatic]] ([[User talk:Bongomatic|talk]]) 14:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

539303 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-05 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.183671480E09 +++$+++ I sega drugo: bi li za6titil stranitsata na levski Sofiq, za6toto nqkakvi neregistrirani postoqnno pi6at 4e bil nai-populqrniq klub, koeto ne e vqrno i mi omrazna da go popravqm ve4e... Sajalqvam, 4e na moga da pi6a na kirilitsa, no ne6to ne moga da q nastroq... Pozdravi, -- +++$+++ I sega drugo: bi li za6titil stranitsata na levski Sofiq, za6toto nqkakvi neregistrirani postoqnno pi6at 4e bil nai-populqrniq klub, koeto ne e vqrno i mi omrazna da go popravqm ve4e... Sajalqvam, 4e na moga da pi6a na kirilitsa, no ne6to ne moga da q nastroq... Pozdravi, --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 14:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
539304 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539303 +++$+++ 539303 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.183734300E09 +++$+++ \u0414\u0430, \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0431\u0435\u0448\u0435 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u044f \u0432\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0430\u043d\u0442 \u043d\u0430\u0438\u0441\u0438\u0442\u0438\u043d\u0430: ) \u0418 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f \u0437\u0432\u0443\u0447\u0438 \u0434\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0435. \u0414\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0442\u043e\u0433\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0438\u043c \u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0435\u0432\u043d\u0430 \u0422\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0438\u044f? \u0418 \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0438 \u043a\u043e\u0433\u0430 \u0449\u0435 \u0441\u0435 \u043e\u0441\u044a\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438 \u0438\u0434\u0435\u044f\u0442\u0430. \u0410\u043a\u043e \u0438\u043c\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u043a, \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0433\u043d\u0430 \u0432\u044a\u043f\u0440\u0435\u043a\u0438 \u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0438 \u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0441 \u0431\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u043d\u0435\u0442\u043e \u0441 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u044e\u0442\u044a\u0440: ) -- +++$+++ :Да, това беше другия вариант наиситина: ) И история на България звучи добре. Дали тогава да включим и древна Тракия? И как и кога ще се осъществи идеята. Ако има как, мога да помогна въпреки ограничените си умения с боравенето с компютър: ) --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] 08:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

15016 +++$+++ Blueboar +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ 15016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-21 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.248240360E09 +++$+++ Note... I am not attempting to change your vote... just making sure that you are voting on the right article.  +++$+++ Note... I am not attempting to change your vote... just making sure that you are voting on the right article. [[User:Blueboar|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar|talk]]) 22:26, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
15017 +++$+++ LexCorp +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ 15016 +++$+++ 15016 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.248241740E09 +++$+++ Concur. I came independently to give you a notice pertaining the same as above. Seems you may be under the impression that the vote is for the [[Apollo Moon Landing hoax conspiracy theories]] which is not correct.-- +++$+++ :Concur. I came independently to give you a notice pertaining the same as above. Seems you may be under the impression that the vote is for the [[Apollo Moon Landing hoax conspiracy theories]] which is not correct.--[[User:LexCorp|LexCorp]] ([[User talk:LexCorp|talk]]) 22:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

539305 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-08 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.183944420E09 +++$+++ Todor, any thoughts on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=History_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_Bulgaria&action=history this move]? Never mind that he didn't fix double redirects, the template, etc., but I think it's unnecessary. See also [[Talk:Communist_Romania#Move_proposal|this related discussion]].  +++$+++ Todor, any thoughts on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_Bulgaria&action=history this move]? Never mind that he didn't fix double redirects, the template, etc., but I think it's unnecessary. See also [[Talk:Communist_Romania#Move_proposal|this related discussion]]. [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] 18:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
539306 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539305 +++$+++ 539305 +++$+++ 2007-07-10 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.184129340E09 +++$+++ The stakes have been [[Special:Contributions\/Anonimu|raised]]!  +++$+++ :The stakes have been [[Special:Contributions/Anonimu|raised]]! [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] 21:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

277162 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277162 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-21 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.161480240E09 +++$+++ The official website (if it is) of Raj Sharda that was just added says he was a past councillor, but the election results for Oakville at [http:\/\/www.oakville.ca\/2000elections.htm] say otherwise.  I suppose we can't remove a link to an official website simply because it contains lies, can we?  Or am I missing something--could a candidate really lie like that? <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ The official website (if it is) of Raj Sharda that was just added says he was a past councillor, but the election results for Oakville at [http://www.oakville.ca/2000elections.htm] say otherwise.  I suppose we can't remove a link to an official website simply because it contains lies, can we?  Or am I missing something--could a candidate really lie like that? <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="blue">OzLawyer</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 18:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
277163 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277162 +++$+++ 277162 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.161484260E09 +++$+++ Raj's full name is \"Rajneesh Kumar Sharda\", from my research. That's quite weird though that the Oakville website doesn't mention him. According to [http:\/\/www.pas.gov.on.ca\/scripts\/en\/bios.asp?boardID=876&persID=135118 The Public Appointments Secretariat], he did hold those positions, so it's a widespread lie. I've explained to him by email that he needs to source his statements. He will be doing an interview with Wikinews \"by the end of the week\", so he claims. Frankly I don't know what to think.  --   +++$+++ : Raj's full name is "Rajneesh Kumar Sharda", from my research. That's quite weird though that the Oakville website doesn't mention him. According to [http://www.pas.gov.on.ca/scripts/en/bios.asp?boardID=876&persID=135118 The Public Appointments Secretariat], he did hold those positions, so it's a widespread lie. I've explained to him by email that he needs to source his statements. He will be doing an interview with Wikinews "by the end of the week", so he claims. Frankly I don't know what to think.  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 19:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
277164 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277162 +++$+++ 277163 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.161485280E09 +++$+++ --   +++$+++ :: --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 19:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
277165 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277162 +++$+++ 277163 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.161485640E09 +++$+++ Further skin off his story... at some consultation, he said \"I\u2019m glad I\u2019m not on the other side of this bench. So... I don\u2019t have a lot of expertise to express to you guys.\"[http:\/\/72.14.205.104\/search?q=cache:bYL4R9BOhMgJ:www.oakville.ca\/Media_Files\/DevelopmentProcess\/144OPA198Feb27Trans.pdf+site:www.oakville.ca+sharda&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1] Thus on February 27, 2002 he was not a councillor, and he didn't even think he had a lot of merit talking. Mayor Mulvale then says \"thank you for joining us\", as if his precence was unusual.  --   +++$+++ :: Further skin off his story... at some consultation, he said "I’m glad I’m not on the other side of this bench. So... I don’t have a lot of expertise to express to you guys."[http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:bYL4R9BOhMgJ:www.oakville.ca/Media_Files/DevelopmentProcess/144OPA198Feb27Trans.pdf+site:www.oakville.ca+sharda&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1] Thus on February 27, 2002 he was not a councillor, and he didn't even think he had a lot of merit talking. Mayor Mulvale then says "thank you for joining us", as if his precence was unusual.  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 19:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
277166 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277162 +++$+++ 277163 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.161486060E09 +++$+++ Okay, now on the \"Testimonials\" page of his site, he has a quote about him from a tribute \"to retiring Council members\".  --   +++$+++ :: Okay, now on the "Testimonials" page of his site, he has a quote about him from a tribute "to retiring Council members".  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 20:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

277167 +++$+++ IanManka +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-22 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.161509040E09 +++$+++ In case you are wondering why it took so long to begin this tournament, my computer was not operating correctly, and my Internet usage was limited to public computers. My opportunities to use public computers were limited, so needless to say, I didn't have a lot of time to commit to Wikipedia. So, sorry if this has caused you any inconvience. Good luck! If you have any questions, please contact me at [[User talk:IanManka|my talk page]].  +++$+++ In case you are wondering why it took so long to begin this tournament, my computer was not operating correctly, and my Internet usage was limited to public computers. My opportunities to use public computers were limited, so needless to say, I didn't have a lot of time to commit to Wikipedia. So, sorry if this has caused you any inconvience. Good luck! If you have any questions, please contact me at [[User talk:IanManka|my talk page]]. [[User:IanManka|Ian Manka]] 02:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
277168 +++$+++ IanManka +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277167 +++$+++ 277167 +++$+++ 2006-10-22 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.161510120E09 +++$+++ Yeah, you did that right... just some faulty coding and some poor instructions. I don't know how to have the template do the \"<nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>\" without leaving my signature, so there you have it. Just correct it with your signature. Sorry about that. If you have any questions, please contact me at [[User talk:IanManka|my talk page]].  +++$+++ :Yeah, you did that right... just some faulty coding and some poor instructions. I don't know how to have the template do the "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" without leaving my signature, so there you have it. Just correct it with your signature. Sorry about that. If you have any questions, please contact me at [[User talk:IanManka|my talk page]]. [[User:IanManka|Ian Manka]] 02:42, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

570483 +++$+++ Leolaursen +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-21 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.219354920E09 +++$+++ I'm guessing it is related to Your last edit (08:43, 21 August 2008).&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp; +++$+++ I'm guessing it is related to Your last edit (08:43, 21 August 2008).&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Leolaursen|Leo&nbsp;Laursen]]&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User talk:Leolaursen|✍]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Leolaursen|⌘]] 14:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
570484 +++$+++ Leolaursen +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570483 +++$+++ 570483 +++$+++ 2008-08-21 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.219355040E09 +++$+++ Ah, You fixed it while I was typing.&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp; +++$+++ :Ah, You fixed it while I was typing.&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Leolaursen|Leo&nbsp;Laursen]]&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User talk:Leolaursen|✍]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Leolaursen|⌘]] 14:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
570485 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570483 +++$+++ 570484 +++$+++ 2008-08-21 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.219355580E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 14:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

15029 +++$+++ TigreTiger +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ 15029 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-27 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.288230960E09 +++$+++ Please see [[User_talk:TigreTiger#BLAH_BLAH_Municipality]]  +++$+++ Please see [[User_talk:TigreTiger#BLAH_BLAH_Municipality]] [[User:TigreTiger|TigreTiger]] ([[User talk:TigreTiger|talk]]) 18:56, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
15030 +++$+++ TigreTiger +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ 15029 +++$+++ 15029 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.288238400E09 +++$+++ Replied. What to do when a city does not correspond to a municipality nor a parish?  +++$+++ :Replied. What to do when a city does not correspond to a municipality nor a parish? [[User:TigreTiger|TigreTiger]] ([[User talk:TigreTiger|talk]]) 21:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

15032 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ 15032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-03 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.294065360E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=PedroPVZ}} your upload log]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=PedroPVZ}} your upload log]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 06:36, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
15033 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ PedroPVZ +++$+++ 15032 +++$+++ 15032 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.296020460E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing![[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  21:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

539324 +++$+++ Capricornis +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-29 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.188434160E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Capricornis|Capricornis]] 17:36, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
539325 +++$+++ Mr. Neutron +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539324 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.188437880E09 +++$+++ Todor, if I were you I would simply ignore this comment above :)  +++$+++ ::Todor, if I were you I would simply ignore this comment above :) [[User:Mr. Neutron|Mr. Neutron]] 18:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

15037 +++$+++ Akrabbim +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ 15037 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.312311660E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, I think everybody is pretty happy with the last batch that DASHbot ran on the album reviews. If you could get that going again that would be great\u2014I hope it isn't too much trouble for you to give it a shove.  Thanks &mdash;''' +++$+++ Hi Tim, I think everybody is pretty happy with the last batch that DASHbot ran on the album reviews. If you could get that going again that would be great—I hope it isn't too much trouble for you to give it a shove.  Thanks &mdash;'''[[User:Akrabbim|Akrabbim]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Akrabbim|talk]]</sup> 12:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
15038 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ 15037 +++$+++ 15037 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.312315200E09 +++$+++ I think everybody is ''really'' happy with the last batch.  It seems to me that there was an outstanding issue with the \"general cleanup\" stuff, where the bot was enforcing one parameter per line in the infobox, and that wasn't working perfectly.  I'd like to suggest that the bot be changed, to not do any general cleanup of the infobox or the rest of the article.  Just have the bot move the album ratings from the infobox to the album ratings template.  That's the part that everyone wants to have happen, and is really focused on, and that part seems to be working really well.  Once all the ratings have been moved, the bot optionally could be enhanced or changed further to do general cleanup of the infobox or the articles, or not.  In other words, I think the best approach now is to really focus on the main task of moving the ratings, without letting the other stuff slow us down.  Just my two cents. <font face=\"cursive\">\u2014  +++$+++ :I think everybody is ''really'' happy with the last batch.  It seems to me that there was an outstanding issue with the "general cleanup" stuff, where the bot was enforcing one parameter per line in the infobox, and that wasn't working perfectly.  I'd like to suggest that the bot be changed, to not do any general cleanup of the infobox or the rest of the article.  Just have the bot move the album ratings from the infobox to the album ratings template.  That's the part that everyone wants to have happen, and is really focused on, and that part seems to be working really well.  Once all the ratings have been moved, the bot optionally could be enhanced or changed further to do general cleanup of the infobox or the articles, or not.  In other words, I think the best approach now is to really focus on the main task of moving the ratings, without letting the other stuff slow us down.  Just my two cents. <font face="cursive">— [[User:Mudwater|Mudwater]]<small><sup> ([[User talk:Mudwater|Talk]])</sup></small></font> 13:00, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
15039 +++$+++ Drilnoth +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ 15037 +++$+++ 15038 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.312316100E09 +++$+++ Another run would be great. Unfortunately, Tim seems to be somewhat inactive (over a week since his last edit). :( \u2013 +++$+++ ::Another run would be great. Unfortunately, Tim seems to be somewhat inactive (over a week since his last edit). :( –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]]) 13:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

277182 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277182 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-28 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.162071360E09 +++$+++ This user removed your footnotes from the election article and added much text without citations after I let him or her know that they were necessary. He then claimed the footnotes were irrelevant. <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ This user removed your footnotes from the election article and added much text without citations after I let him or her know that they were necessary. He then claimed the footnotes were irrelevant. <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="blue">OzLawyer</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 14:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
277183 +++$+++ Zanimum +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277182 +++$+++ 277182 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.162081440E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I just discovered them when before I logged in. I'm asking them if they're somehow affliated with the election, due to their suspicious username.  --   +++$+++ : Thanks, I just discovered them when before I logged in. I'm asking them if they're somehow affliated with the election, due to their suspicious username.  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 17:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

306017 +++$+++ Ww2censor +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 306017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-02 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.236052920E09 +++$+++ While there is [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Prosposed change too WP:ATH|discussion about GAA players]] in general and specifically some of [[User:CorkMan|CorkMan's]] creations, another editor [[User:Kerryman|Kerryman]] also seems to be prolific in creating many, often unreferenced, player's stubs that may not be notable, even in GAA terms. I am no expert on the Irish sports scene but happened across many of them while assessing articles for the [[WP:IE|Ireland WikiProject]], mainly finding them through [[User:AlexNewArtBot\/IrelandSearchResult|this bot generated list]] and its archives. Cheers.  +++$+++ While there is [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Prosposed change too WP:ATH|discussion about GAA players]] in general and specifically some of [[User:CorkMan|CorkMan's]] creations, another editor [[User:Kerryman|Kerryman]] also seems to be prolific in creating many, often unreferenced, player's stubs that may not be notable, even in GAA terms. I am no expert on the Irish sports scene but happened across many of them while assessing articles for the [[WP:IE|Ireland WikiProject]], mainly finding them through [[User:AlexNewArtBot/IrelandSearchResult|this bot generated list]] and its archives. Cheers. [[User:Ww2censor|ww2censor]] ([[User talk:Ww2censor|talk]]) 20:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
306018 +++$+++ Ww2censor +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 306017 +++$+++ 306017 +++$+++ 2009-03-02 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.236060240E09 +++$+++ Oops, wrong Kerryman. Try [[User:Kerryman2|Kerryman2]]. And, some of those club articles seem pretty non-notable to me too, but as I said I am no expert on that pitch.  +++$+++ :Oops, wrong Kerryman. Try [[User:Kerryman2|Kerryman2]]. And, some of those club articles seem pretty non-notable to me too, but as I said I am no expert on that pitch. [[User:Ww2censor|ww2censor]] ([[User talk:Ww2censor|talk]]) 22:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
306019 +++$+++ 2008Olympian +++$+++ Gnevin +++$+++ 306017 +++$+++ 306018 +++$+++ 2009-03-03 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.236135540E09 +++$+++ I apologize for my comments to you in that discussion, it is a discussion not an RfC.  You are quite right to engage anyone you choose.  Again  I am sorry.-- +++$+++ ::I apologize for my comments to you in that discussion, it is a discussion not an RfC.  You are quite right to engage anyone you choose.  Again  I am sorry.--[[User:2008Olympian|<font color="blue">2008</font><font color="DD9922">Olym</font><font color="black">pian</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:2008Olympian|<font color="green">chit</font><font color="BB0000">chat</font>]]</sup> 18:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

15040 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ 15040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.312487340E09 +++$+++ {{Outdent|::}}Hey Tim.  It looks like the album ratings bot updated a big batch of articles last night.  That's great.  I've spot checked a few of the updates and they seem good to me.  Looks like you're going with the suggestion of having the bot only move the ratings, so that's cool. <font face=\"cursive\">\u2014  +++$+++ {{Outdent|::}}Hey Tim.  It looks like the album ratings bot updated a big batch of articles last night.  That's great.  I've spot checked a few of the updates and they seem good to me.  Looks like you're going with the suggestion of having the bot only move the ratings, so that's cool. <font face="cursive">— [[User:Mudwater|Mudwater]]<small><sup> ([[User talk:Mudwater|Talk]])</sup></small></font> 12:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
15041 +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ 15040 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.312492680E09 +++$+++ Yep, sorry (again) for the delay. I had it set to do 5,000 but it looks like the toolserver had a network blip so it died before finishing. I'll restart it and do another 1,000 for good measure. Thanks for your patience! {{=)}}  +++$+++ :::Yep, sorry (again) for the delay. I had it set to do 5,000 but it looks like the toolserver had a network blip so it died before finishing. I'll restart it and do another 1,000 for good measure. Thanks for your patience! {{=)}} [[User:Tim1357|<font color="Blue" face="Arial" >Tim]]</font><font color="Red" face="Optima" >[[Special:Contributions/Tim1357|1357]]</font> <sup><font face="Times new roman" size = 2 >[[User talk:Tim1357|talk]]</font></sup> 14:18, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
15042 +++$+++ Mudwater +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ 15040 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312533900E09 +++$+++ Great, thanks!  I've started a new talk page section for editors to leave feedback on the bot's work, at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums#Album ratings bot]].  Let's see what people say about this batch.  I'll check some more updates myself when I get a chance.  So far everything looks perfect.  Although here are two really minor suggestions for your consideration:  (1) The bot is already saying in its edit summary whether it added the album ratings template after the infobox or to the Reception section.  Could it also mention in the edit summary if it had to add a References section for the footnotes?  (2) In the edit summary it says Common Fixes Applied, but that could be left out since we're skipping the common fixes.  Anyway, thanks again. <font face=\"cursive\">\u2014  +++$+++ ::::Great, thanks!  I've started a new talk page section for editors to leave feedback on the bot's work, at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums#Album ratings bot]].  Let's see what people say about this batch.  I'll check some more updates myself when I get a chance.  So far everything looks perfect.  Although here are two really minor suggestions for your consideration:  (1) The bot is already saying in its edit summary whether it added the album ratings template after the infobox or to the Reception section.  Could it also mention in the edit summary if it had to add a References section for the footnotes?  (2) In the edit summary it says Common Fixes Applied, but that could be left out since we're skipping the common fixes.  Anyway, thanks again. <font face="cursive">— [[User:Mudwater|Mudwater]]<small><sup> ([[User talk:Mudwater|Talk]])</sup></small></font> 01:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

15043 +++$+++ OpinionFreeZone +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ 15043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.312575360E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ Cheers, [[User:OpinionFreeZone|OpinionFreeZone]] ([[User talk:OpinionFreeZone|talk]]) 13:16, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
15044 +++$+++ Drilnoth +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ 15043 +++$+++ 15043 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312586400E09 +++$+++ Just a [[WP:TPS|Talk Page Stalker]] chiming in here. I, personally, prefer unspaced headers (I'm a coder and programmer, and seeing extra spaces around what amounts to HTML &lt;h#&gt; tags is painful), but I think it is something which probably shouldn't be handled by bots. It doesn't really matter one way or another, and I've seen several people comment about such automated changes (from this bot and others) and what the point of them is. \u2013 +++$+++ :Just a [[WP:TPS|Talk Page Stalker]] chiming in here. I, personally, prefer unspaced headers (I'm a coder and programmer, and seeing extra spaces around what amounts to HTML &lt;h#&gt; tags is painful), but I think it is something which probably shouldn't be handled by bots. It doesn't really matter one way or another, and I've seen several people comment about such automated changes (from this bot and others) and what the point of them is. –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]]) 16:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

15045 +++$+++ The-Pope +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ 15045 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.312581480E09 +++$+++ G'day Tim, Did the Dashbot get tired from all the album edits and needed a rest? The [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?limit=499&tagFilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=DASHBot&namespace=4&tagfilter=&year=&month=-1 UBLP run] didn't happen today. We're almost there... under 1900 to go!  +++$+++ G'day Tim, Did the Dashbot get tired from all the album edits and needed a rest? The [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=499&tagFilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=DASHBot&namespace=4&tagfilter=&year=&month=-1 UBLP run] didn't happen today. We're almost there... under 1900 to go! [[User:The-Pope|The-Pope]] ([[User talk:The-Pope|talk]]) 14:58, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
15046 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ 15045 +++$+++ 15045 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.312624500E09 +++$+++ Ditto for the image resize bot- 275+ images currently in the queue.   +++$+++ :Ditto for the image resize bot- 275+ images currently in the queue.  [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 02:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
15047 +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ 15045 +++$+++ 15046 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.312659300E09 +++$+++ Looks like all bot tasks that rely on the toolserver database aren't working. :\/  +++$+++ ::Looks like all bot tasks that rely on the toolserver database aren't working. :/ [[User:Tim1357|<font color="Blue" face="Arial" >Tim]]</font><font color="Red" face="Optima" >[[Special:Contributions/Tim1357|1357]]</font> <sup><font face="Times new roman" size = 2 >[[User talk:Tim1357|talk]]</font></sup> 12:35, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
15048 +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ 15045 +++$+++ 15047 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.312661880E09 +++$+++ Looks like they may have renamed the database server I was using. I'm not sure though. In any case, I moved all my bot tasks to a new server that should be working fine.  +++$+++ :::Looks like they may have renamed the database server I was using. I'm not sure though. In any case, I moved all my bot tasks to a new server that should be working fine. [[User:Tim1357|<font color="Blue" face="Arial" >Tim]]</font><font color="Red" face="Optima" >[[Special:Contributions/Tim1357|1357]]</font> <sup><font face="Times new roman" size = 2 >[[User talk:Tim1357|talk]]</font></sup> 13:18, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

89889 +++$+++ Gandydancer +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ 89889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-26 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.277607780E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/gandydancer\/3173573510\/   Thanks!   +++$+++ http://www.flickr.com/photos/gandydancer/3173573510/   Thanks!  [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]] ([[User talk:Gandydancer|talk]]) 20:03, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
89890 +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ 89889 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-27 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.277647860E09 +++$+++ if this picture is taken by yourself you can upload it at wikimeda commons -- +++$+++ ::if this picture is taken by yourself you can upload it at wikimeda commons --[[User:Melly42|Melly42]] ([[User talk:Melly42#top|talk]]) 07:11, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

277192 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-01 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.162452480E09 +++$+++ It looks like you got through the RfA process with 100% support, so well done! I hope you enjoy your time as an administrator - good luck and happy editing!  +++$+++ It looks like you got through the RfA process with 100% support, so well done! I hope you enjoy your time as an administrator - good luck and happy editing! [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 23:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
277193 +++$+++ Taxman +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277192 +++$+++ 277192 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.162453560E09 +++$+++ Agreed, congratulations. Use the new tools wisely, as I'm sure you will. Be conservative with them, especially at first, but as you get familiar with them dig in and help clear the backlogs. Diffusing a situation is often more valuable than blocking, so see if you can do that whenever possible. Have fun, and again congrats. -  +++$+++ :Agreed, congratulations. Use the new tools wisely, as I'm sure you will. Be conservative with them, especially at first, but as you get familiar with them dig in and help clear the backlogs. Diffusing a situation is often more valuable than blocking, so see if you can do that whenever possible. Have fun, and again congrats. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Taxman|Talk]]</small></sup> 23:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
277194 +++$+++ MJCdetroit +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277192 +++$+++ 277193 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.162461720E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on gaining your new super-powers!  Now go out there kick some ass and take no prisoners.  As for me, the articles on the Queen, [[Stephen Harper]], and [[Don Cherry (hockey)|Don Cherry]] have '''Vandalize Us''' written all over them.  Just kidding.  Happy editting.  &mdash;I'm  +++$+++ ::Congratulations on gaining your new super-powers!  Now go out there kick some ass and take no prisoners.  As for me, the articles on the Queen, [[Stephen Harper]], and [[Don Cherry (hockey)|Don Cherry]] have '''Vandalize Us''' written all over them.  Just kidding.  Happy editting.  &mdash;I'm [[User:MJCdetroit|MJCdetroit]] and I approved this message. &mdash;02:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
277195 +++$+++ JChap2007 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277192 +++$+++ 277194 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.162462620E09 +++$+++ Congrats.  Does this mean that [[Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario|Peel]] will give you a raise? ;)  +++$+++ :::Congrats.  Does this mean that [[Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario|Peel]] will give you a raise? ;) [[User:JChap2007|JChap2007]] 02:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
277196 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277192 +++$+++ 277192 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.162533480E09 +++$+++ Congrats Os! If you ever need help with the new tools, you know where to reach me. =)  +++$+++ :Congrats Os! If you ever need help with the new tools, you know where to reach me. =) [[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">'''Nish'''</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">'''kid'''</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">'''64'''</span>]] 21:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
277197 +++$+++ HJKeats +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277192 +++$+++ 277192 +++$+++ 2006-11-03 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.162607640E09 +++$+++ Hi OzLawyer, congratulations on your appointment as Administrator. Certainly, from what I have seen of your integrity to producing quality articles and your contributions to keeping this project (Wikipedia) and world class resource, it was an excellent choice. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi OzLawyer, congratulations on your appointment as Administrator. Certainly, from what I have seen of your integrity to producing quality articles and your contributions to keeping this project (Wikipedia) and world class resource, it was an excellent choice. Cheers, [[User:HJKeats|HJKeats]] 18:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

15050 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ 15050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.310667960E09 +++$+++ Please read last responses on discussions [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2011_July_9#Category:Wikipedians_with_Celtic.2CSlavic.2CGermanic.2CHebrew_ancestors discussion 1] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2011_July_12#Category:Wikipedians_with_sense_of_humor discussion 2] and [[User_talk:FaktneviM#Categories_for_discussion_.28nomination_of_WwCSGHa.29|discussion 3]] (topic on my talk page). Thanks for help. -- +++$+++ Please read last responses on discussions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_July_9#Category:Wikipedians_with_Celtic.2CSlavic.2CGermanic.2CHebrew_ancestors discussion 1] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_July_12#Category:Wikipedians_with_sense_of_humor discussion 2] and [[User_talk:FaktneviM#Categories_for_discussion_.28nomination_of_WwCSGHa.29|discussion 3]] (topic on my talk page). Thanks for help. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 11:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
15051 +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ 15050 +++$+++ 15050 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310688780E09 +++$+++ Hi, FaktneviM. I just want to clarify, so there's no confusion: are you requesting [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion\/Log\/2011 July 12#Category:Wikipedians with sense of humor|here]] that the categories be speedily deleted? If so, I can go ahead and do that. Best, -- ''' +++$+++ :Hi, FaktneviM. I just want to clarify, so there's no confusion: are you requesting [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 July 12#Category:Wikipedians with sense of humor|here]] that the categories be speedily deleted? If so, I can go ahead and do that. Best, -- '''[[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Black Falcon|talk]])</sup> 17:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
15052 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ 15050 +++$+++ 15051 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310700000E09 +++$+++ '''Yes. My new mind is deleting those 3 pages.''' ((( Initially I want to leave them in my space for my own unique using, but such option is not able, as you stated ---- in discussion 1 ---- you wroted:  ''\"In response to FaktneviM's request: there really is no way to move a category to user space. A category is a technical function that allows related pages to be grouped together. -- Black Falcon\"'' ))). -- +++$+++ ::'''Yes. My new mind is deleting those 3 pages.''' ((( Initially I want to leave them in my space for my own unique using, but such option is not able, as you stated ---- in discussion 1 ---- you wroted:  ''"In response to FaktneviM's request: there really is no way to move a category to user space. A category is a technical function that allows related pages to be grouped together. -- Black Falcon"'' ))). --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 20:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
15053 +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ 15050 +++$+++ 15052 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.310776560E09 +++$+++ <big style=\"color:#690; font-size:1.4em;\">&#x2713;<\/big>&nbsp;'''Done'''<!--template:done-t-->. Yes, unfortunately, categories cannot be moved liked other pages; this is a known issue (see e.g. [[Wikipedia:Category namespace#Moving and redirecting category pages|here]] and the third paragraph of [[Wikipedia:Moving a page]]), but there is no easy solution at this time. Best, -- ''' +++$+++ :::<big style="color:#690; font-size:1.4em;">&#x2713;</big>&nbsp;'''Done'''<!--template:done-t-->. Yes, unfortunately, categories cannot be moved liked other pages; this is a known issue (see e.g. [[Wikipedia:Category namespace#Moving and redirecting category pages|here]] and the third paragraph of [[Wikipedia:Moving a page]]), but there is no easy solution at this time. Best, -- '''[[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Black Falcon|talk]])</sup> 17:36, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
15054 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ 15050 +++$+++ 15053 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310780820E09 +++$+++ Thank you! Sadly I have now [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~soxred93\/simplecount\/index.php?name=FaktneviM&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia \"Deleted edits: 6\"] in editcounter. Catastrophic scenario. I thought user request for deletion are not considered as vandalism. -- +++$+++ ::::Thank you! Sadly I have now [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/simplecount/index.php?name=FaktneviM&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia "Deleted edits: 6"] in editcounter. Catastrophic scenario. I thought user request for deletion are not considered as vandalism. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 18:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
15055 +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ 15050 +++$+++ 15054 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310876040E09 +++$+++ Deleted edits are nothing to worry about and are not a sign of anything negative. Most users, especially those who carry out maintenance or deletion-related tasks, have a significant number of deleted edits; for example, I have [http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~soxred93\/pcount\/index.php?name=Black+Falcon&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia over 9,000 deleted edits]. -- ''' +++$+++ :::::Deleted edits are nothing to worry about and are not a sign of anything negative. Most users, especially those who carry out maintenance or deletion-related tasks, have a significant number of deleted edits; for example, I have [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pcount/index.php?name=Black+Falcon&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia over 9,000 deleted edits]. -- '''[[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Black Falcon|talk]])</sup> 21:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
15056 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ 15050 +++$+++ 15055 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310926560E09 +++$+++ I knew that before your response. I saw your account huge numbers of edits, including deleted ones. Maybe is not so catastrophic :)) If I need any help in future, I\xb4ll contact you. See You. -- +++$+++ ::::::I knew that before your response. I saw your account huge numbers of edits, including deleted ones. Maybe is not so catastrophic :)) If I need any help in future, I´ll contact you. See You. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 11:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

277200 +++$+++ Master Jay +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277200 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-03 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.162542240E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure of what libraries you frequent (if you even frequent libraries at all), but perhaps you may want to look into scanning an old photo or two of Brampton if you ever happen to come upon an old newspaper, especially ones taken during major development in the 60's and 70's. As usual, it isn't anything urgent, nonetheless, such photos would add greatly to quite a few articles. On another subject, what do you say we make a drive to get Brampton up to featured article status sometime in the New Year. It's worth a shot. -- +++$+++ I'm not sure of what libraries you frequent (if you even frequent libraries at all), but perhaps you may want to look into scanning an old photo or two of Brampton if you ever happen to come upon an old newspaper, especially ones taken during major development in the 60's and 70's. As usual, it isn't anything urgent, nonetheless, such photos would add greatly to quite a few articles. On another subject, what do you say we make a drive to get Brampton up to featured article status sometime in the New Year. It's worth a shot. --[[User:Master Jay|<font style="background:black">'''<font color="white">Jay</font>'''</font>]]'''<font style="background:gold">([[User talk:Master Jay|Reply]])'''</font> 00:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
277201 +++$+++ Master Jay +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277200 +++$+++ 277200 +++$+++ 2006-11-03 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.162543440E09 +++$+++ A BCC photo when it was being built would be great if there is one. -- +++$+++ :A BCC photo when it was being built would be great if there is one. --[[User:Master Jay|<font style="background:black">'''<font color="white">Jay</font>'''</font>]]'''<font style="background:gold">([[User talk:Master Jay|Reply]])'''</font> 00:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
277202 +++$+++ Ihcoyc +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277200 +++$+++ 277200 +++$+++ 2006-11-03 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.162593960E09 +++$+++ Sure - that's \"Through Struggles to the Greatest Good of the Citizens\" (or, \"the greatest civic good\").  It's a fairly obvious play on the traditional tag ''[[per ardua ad astra]]'', \"through struggles to the stars.\" -  +++$+++ :Sure - that's "Through Struggles to the Greatest Good of the Citizens" (or, "the greatest civic good").  It's a fairly obvious play on the traditional tag ''[[per ardua ad astra]]'', "through struggles to the stars." - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] 14:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
277203 +++$+++ Muke +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277200 +++$+++ 277202 +++$+++ 2006-11-03 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.162598880E09 +++$+++ You might see as well a play in the Latin itself there\u2014 ''arduus'' means literally \"steep\", and ''summum'' literally \"highest\" (and also \"top of\" in a construction like this), so you have the metaphor of climbing \"through steepnesses to the top of...\" expressing the more idiomatic interpretation of \"through difficulties to the greatest civic good\". (If 'citizens' was meant, I'm not sure why the ordinary word ''civium'' \"of citizens\" wouldn't be used, instead of 'civilium', which is more like \"of things pertaining to citizens\", but then, the use of the vocabulary changes over time...)  Oh!  And in addition to [[per ardua ad astra]] I'd also link you to [[summum bonum]] which also has an article.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::You might see as well a play in the Latin itself there— ''arduus'' means literally "steep", and ''summum'' literally "highest" (and also "top of" in a construction like this), so you have the metaphor of climbing "through steepnesses to the top of..." expressing the more idiomatic interpretation of "through difficulties to the greatest civic good". (If 'citizens' was meant, I'm not sure why the ordinary word ''civium'' "of citizens" wouldn't be used, instead of 'civilium', which is more like "of things pertaining to citizens", but then, the use of the vocabulary changes over time...)  Oh!  And in addition to [[per ardua ad astra]] I'd also link you to [[summum bonum]] which also has an article.  —[[User:Muke|Muke Tever]] [[User talk:Muke|talk]] 16:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

15060 +++$+++ Colin Rowat +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ 15060 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311735960E09 +++$+++ I saw that you are tracking the Fearon vandal.  Presuming this to mean that you are gathering information on the legendary William\/Roy\/etc. Fearon, the black doctor\/philosopher\/economist, I wonder whether you might be interested in viewing a spam e-mail just sent to a list of economic theorists from the legend himself, warning us about damage to Britney Spears' vocal cords.  If so, please let me know.  Thank you,  +++$+++ I saw that you are tracking the Fearon vandal.  Presuming this to mean that you are gathering information on the legendary William/Roy/etc. Fearon, the black doctor/philosopher/economist, I wonder whether you might be interested in viewing a spam e-mail just sent to a list of economic theorists from the legend himself, warning us about damage to Britney Spears' vocal cords.  If so, please let me know.  Thank you, [[User:Colin Rowat|Colin Rowat]] ([[User talk:Colin Rowat|talk]]) 20:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
15061 +++$+++  +++$+++ Black Falcon +++$+++ 15060 +++$+++ 15060 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.310754300E09 +++$+++ Your help in any and all of these matters would be amazing! Please let me know what you think about the answers to the FA and DYK feeds, and these additional \"challenges\". Islahaddow (talk) 11:25, 15 July 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ :Your help in any and all of these matters would be amazing! Please let me know what you think about the answers to the FA and DYK feeds, and these additional "challenges". Islahaddow (talk) 11:25, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

15062 +++$+++ Norbit36 +++$+++ GoPurpleNGold24 +++$+++ 15062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-20 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.300681320E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/danonenationscup2010.com\/?page_id=480 -- +++$+++ http://danonenationscup2010.com/?page_id=480 --[[User:Norbit36|Norbit36]] ([[User talk:Norbit36|talk]]) 21:22, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
15063 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ GoPurpleNGold24 +++$+++ 15062 +++$+++ 15062 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.246868040E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Andr%C3%A9s_Guardado&diff=next&oldid=300246018 That] was not vandalism.  Please do not falsely label edits.\u2014 ''' +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andr%C3%A9s_Guardado&diff=next&oldid=300246018 That] was not vandalism.  Please do not falsely label edits.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 01:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

550295 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-10 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.163215440E09 +++$+++ Well, I can't name the precise source from which I took it - because 6.3 million, of whom a 3rd were Serbs (not counting 750,000 Muslims) is a figure repeated everywhere. So here's one instance - Robert Donia's and John Junior V. A. Fine's ''[http:\/\/www.ucis.pitt.edu\/eehistory\/H200Readings\/Topic4-R4.html Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Tradition Betrayed]''. If memory serves me well (but don't 100% pull my word on this one), the figures are from some Nazi German officers' reports... I missed also 30,000 Jews. Bog! -- +++$+++ Well, I can't name the precise source from which I took it - because 6.3 million, of whom a 3rd were Serbs (not counting 750,000 Muslims) is a figure repeated everywhere. So here's one instance - Robert Donia's and John Junior V. A. Fine's ''[http://www.ucis.pitt.edu/eehistory/H200Readings/Topic4-R4.html Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Tradition Betrayed]''. If memory serves me well (but don't 100% pull my word on this one), the figures are from some Nazi German officers' reports... I missed also 30,000 Jews. Bog! --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 19:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
550296 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550295 +++$+++ 550295 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.163215680E09 +++$+++ Sto se ne javi??? Je si li bio u Beogradu? -- +++$+++ :Sto se ne javi??? Je si li bio u Beogradu? --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 19:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
550297 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550295 +++$+++ 550296 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.163215800E09 +++$+++ Pa, reko sam ti kad dolazim, al si ti reko da neces taj vikend biti tamo... Je, bio u Bgu, pravo dobro se proveo :-) -- +++$+++ :: Pa, reko sam ti kad dolazim, al si ti reko da neces taj vikend biti tamo... Je, bio u Bgu, pravo dobro se proveo :-) --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 19:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
550298 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550295 +++$+++ 550297 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.163216100E09 +++$+++ Puh... pa bio sam ja prosle subote i nedjelje u Madzarskoj... ali prije sam bio tu... -- +++$+++ ::: Puh... pa bio sam ja prosle subote i nedjelje u Madzarskoj... ali prije sam bio tu... --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 19:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
550299 +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ Dijxtra +++$+++ 550295 +++$+++ 550298 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.163216160E09 +++$+++ E, jebiga. Al, ne brini, ja sam svako toliko u Bgu. Nesto se mislim da bi opet iso sredinom Decembra, vidjet cu jos... -- +++$+++ :::: E, jebiga. Al, ne brini, ja sam svako toliko u Bgu. Nesto se mislim da bi opet iso sredinom Decembra, vidjet cu jos... --[[User:Dijxtra|Dijxtra]] 19:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

15064 +++$+++ Mikemor92 +++$+++ GoPurpleNGold24 +++$+++ 15064 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-22 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.250996400E09 +++$+++ There's a reference that says he's on loan from Cruz Azul so if that was the case then it doesn't make sense about being on loan from Morelia and the page says he was sold to Cruz Azul.  So I just asked [[WT:FOOTY]] about this. \u2013  +++$+++ There's a reference that says he's on loan from Cruz Azul so if that was the case then it doesn't make sense about being on loan from Morelia and the page says he was sold to Cruz Azul.  So I just asked [[WT:FOOTY]] about this. – [[User:Mikemor92|Michael]] ([[User talk:Mikemor92|talk]]) 20:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
15065 +++$+++ Mikemor92 +++$+++ GoPurpleNGold24 +++$+++ 15064 +++$+++ 15064 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.251077100E09 +++$+++ Dude, I can't read spainish, and also accorting to [http:\/\/msn.foxsports.com\/soccer\/story\/9963742\/Dynamo-sign-Mexican-forward-Luis-Angel-Landin FOX Sports], he was on loan from Cruz Azul and when I was watching the Sounders-New England match on ESPN2, I heard JP Delacamera say he's on loan from Cruz Azul. \u2013  +++$+++ :Dude, I can't read spainish, and also accorting to [http://msn.foxsports.com/soccer/story/9963742/Dynamo-sign-Mexican-forward-Luis-Angel-Landin FOX Sports], he was on loan from Cruz Azul and when I was watching the Sounders-New England match on ESPN2, I heard JP Delacamera say he's on loan from Cruz Azul. – [[User:Mikemor92|Michael]] ([[User talk:Mikemor92|talk]]) 18:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
15066 +++$+++ Mikemor92 +++$+++ GoPurpleNGold24 +++$+++ 15064 +++$+++ 15065 +++$+++ 2009-08-24 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.251178620E09 +++$+++ I know, and that doesn't make any sense at all, that's why I've asked [[WT:FOOTY]] and I'm surprised nobody responded yet, you can't be on loan from 2 clubs at once, he's either on loan from Morelia or Cruz Azul, if he's on loan from Cruz Azul, then Morelia doesn't own his contract rights anymore. \u2013  +++$+++ ::I know, and that doesn't make any sense at all, that's why I've asked [[WT:FOOTY]] and I'm surprised nobody responded yet, you can't be on loan from 2 clubs at once, he's either on loan from Morelia or Cruz Azul, if he's on loan from Cruz Azul, then Morelia doesn't own his contract rights anymore. – [[User:Mikemor92|Michael]] ([[User talk:Mikemor92|talk]]) 22:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

277209 +++$+++ KillerChihuahua +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-04 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.162683360E09 +++$+++ Then there is virtually a non-disagreement between us, although I feel that such fundamental changes are rare.  I beleive that humans are unique in that they can decide who they want to be, and then become that. However, while a WoW likely to decide to want to become an Admin for base reasons, the internal transformation from vandal who disrupts as a hobby to someone who truly desires to assist this undertaking is unlikely - more so for some than others - and the \"school\" would help the surface goal of passing an Rfa but not address the internals, as that is the personal desires of the user, which only he or she can change - and if they change there, they do not need a school.  +++$+++ Then there is virtually a non-disagreement between us, although I feel that such fundamental changes are rare.  I beleive that humans are unique in that they can decide who they want to be, and then become that. However, while a WoW likely to decide to want to become an Admin for base reasons, the internal transformation from vandal who disrupts as a hobby to someone who truly desires to assist this undertaking is unlikely - more so for some than others - and the "school" would help the surface goal of passing an Rfa but not address the internals, as that is the personal desires of the user, which only he or she can change - and if they change there, they do not need a school. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup> 15:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
277210 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277209 +++$+++ 277209 +++$+++ 2006-11-04 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.162683660E09 +++$+++ We're on the same page here\u2014I am in complete agreement that the school would not serve the right purpose. <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ :We're on the same page here—I am in complete agreement that the school would not serve the right purpose. <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="blue">OzLawyer</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 15:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

539354 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-13 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.192333200E09 +++$+++ Is http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Bulgaria_Simeon_I_%28893-927%29.svg correct? How correct is it? I think it has some errors. -- +++$+++ Is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bulgaria_Simeon_I_%28893-927%29.svg correct? How correct is it? I think it has some errors. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 20:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
539355 +++$+++ Laveol +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539354 +++$+++ 539354 +++$+++ 2007-10-13 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.192336260E09 +++$+++ Correct - in every detail. Why do you think it has something wrong? --''' +++$+++ :Correct - in every detail. Why do you think it has something wrong? --'''[[User:Laveol|<font color="#007700">L<font color="#009900">a<font color="#00aa00">v<font color="#00cc00">e</font>o</font>l</font></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Laveol|T]]</sup>''' 21:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
539356 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539354 +++$+++ 539355 +++$+++ 2007-10-19 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.192824900E09 +++$+++ Because it does not include several areas (not quite small) to the west. -- +++$+++ ::Because it does not include several areas (not quite small) to the west. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 13:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
539357 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539354 +++$+++ 539354 +++$+++ 2007-10-14 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.192380900E09 +++$+++ Errors? What do you mean? To make that map I've referred to several Bulgarian and international sources and consulted a well-known specialist on the subject. If you really think there is anything wrong with the map, please back that claim up. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : Errors? What do you mean? To make that map I've referred to several Bulgarian and international sources and consulted a well-known specialist on the subject. If you really think there is anything wrong with the map, please back that claim up. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 09:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
539358 +++$+++ PaxEquilibrium +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539354 +++$+++ 539357 +++$+++ 2007-10-19 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.192824900E09 +++$+++ Well, it doesn't include many territories to the west and southwest. -- +++$+++ ::Well, it doesn't include many territories to the west and southwest. --[[User:PaxEquilibrium|PaxEquilibrium]] 13:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

15069 +++$+++ Digirami +++$+++ GoPurpleNGold24 +++$+++ 15069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-20 07:31:00 +++$+++ 1.264001460E09 +++$+++ Greetings. One article per season is the general consensus. So yes, put both tournaments into one article. If you need any help, let me know. And sorry for the delayed response, but I was on vacation. Slds.  +++$+++ Greetings. One article per season is the general consensus. So yes, put both tournaments into one article. If you need any help, let me know. And sorry for the delayed response, but I was on vacation. Slds. [[User:Digirami|Digirami]] ([[User talk:Digirami|talk]]) 07:31, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
15070 +++$+++ Digirami +++$+++ GoPurpleNGold24 +++$+++ 15069 +++$+++ 15069 +++$+++ 2010-01-21 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.264088040E09 +++$+++ I've gone ahead and created one season article for the Mexican league. See [[2009\u201310 Primera Divisi\xf3n de M\xe9xico season]]. The only thing missing the results table for the Bicentenario.  +++$+++ :I've gone ahead and created one season article for the Mexican league. See [[2009–10 Primera División de México season]]. The only thing missing the results table for the Bicentenario. [[User:Digirami|Digirami]] ([[User talk:Digirami|talk]]) 07:34, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

277214 +++$+++ Electionworld +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277214 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-05 09:27:00 +++$+++ 1.162747620E09 +++$+++ I didn't like his earlier edits, but the last one I considered an improvement.  +++$+++ I didn't like his earlier edits, but the last one I considered an improvement. [[User:Electionworld|Electionworld]] <small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Electionworld|Talk?]]</font></small> 09:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
277215 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277214 +++$+++ 277214 +++$+++ 2006-11-06 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.162802580E09 +++$+++ No problem, Malvinas already redirect to the Falklands article, anyway. Good night,  +++$+++ :No problem, Malvinas already redirect to the Falklands article, anyway. Good night, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 00:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

89893 +++$+++ Jared Preston +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ 89893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-26 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.296103500E09 +++$+++ Hi Melanie, du warst einen Tick schneller als ich mit dem Zur\xfccksetzen [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lena_Meyer-Landrut&action=historysubmit&diff=410231111&oldid=410229925 des Unfugs] bei [[Lena Meyer-Landrut]]. Vielen Dank f\xfcr dein flottes Agieren!  +++$+++ Hi Melanie, du warst einen Tick schneller als ich mit dem Zurücksetzen [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lena_Meyer-Landrut&action=historysubmit&diff=410231111&oldid=410229925 des Unfugs] bei [[Lena Meyer-Landrut]]. Vielen Dank für dein flottes Agieren! [[User:Jared Preston|Jared Preston]] ([[User talk:Jared Preston|talk]]) 20:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
89894 +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ Melly42 +++$+++ 89893 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.296104400E09 +++$+++ Ich w\xfcrde die Seite halbsperren lassen. Der Vandalismus wird in den n\xe4chsten 4 Monaten garantiert verst\xe4rkt auftreten -- +++$+++ ::Ich würde die Seite halbsperren lassen. Der Vandalismus wird in den nächsten 4 Monaten garantiert verstärkt auftreten --[[User:Melly42|Melly42]] ([[User talk:Melly42#top|talk]]) 21:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

539361 +++$+++ Bukkia +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-28 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.193609700E09 +++$+++ \u041f\u0440\u0435\u0432\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0430\u043c \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0438\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438, \u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043a\u0430\u043c \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0432\u0435\u0434\u0430 \u0431\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0442\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0438\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438! \u0412\u0438\u0434\u044f\u0445 \u0442\u0430\u0437\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0430 [[:Image:Bulgaria-SanStefano -(1878)-byTodorBozhinov.png]], \u043d\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u044f \u0441\u0430\u043c \u0437\u0430\u0449\u043e\u0442\u043e \u0446\u0432\u0435\u0442\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0430 \u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u044f... \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0448 \u043b\u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u043c\u0438 \u0438\u0437\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0448 \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u043e\u043d\u0430\u0437\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0430 \u0431\u0435\u0437 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0430? \u0422\u0430\u043a \u0430\u0437 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0448\u0430 \u0432\u0441\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0438 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0438\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438! \u041c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0442\u0438 \u0431\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u044f! (\u0418\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043d\u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u0433\u0440\u0435\u0448\u043a\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043c\u0438, \u043d\u043e \u0430\u0437 \u043e\u0449\u0435 \u0443\u0447\u0430 \u0431\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u0438... P.s: \u0418\u043c\u0430\u043c \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e Photoshop) -- +++$+++ Превеждам историята на България на италиански, и искам да преведа българските ти карти на италиански! Видях тази карта [[:Image:Bulgaria-SanStefano -(1878)-byTodorBozhinov.png]], но не мога да изменя сам защото цветовете са трудни за да работя... можеш ли да ми изпратиш версия на онази карта без имена? Так аз мога да напиша всички имена на италиански! Много ти благодаря! (Извини за грешките ми, но аз още уча български... P.s: Имам само Photoshop) --[[User:Bukkia|Bukkia]] 15:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
539362 +++$+++ Bukkia +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539361 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-28 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.193630460E09 +++$+++ \u041e\u0449\u0435 \u0442\u0440\u044f\u0431\u0432\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0442\u0438 \u0431\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u044f! :) \u0418\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0430, \u043a\u043e\u044f\u0442\u043e \u043c\u0438 \u0434\u0430\u0434\u0435, \u0438 \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0431\u0435\u0448\u0435 \u043f\u043e-\u043b\u0435\u0441\u043d\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u0430\u043c! \u041c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0435 \u0442\u044f \u0435 \u0445\u0443\u0431\u0430\u0432\u0430! \u0422\u0432\u043e\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438 \u043c\u0438 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0445\u0430\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0432\u0430\u0442, \u0442\u0435 \u0441\u0430 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0445\u0443\u0431\u0430\u0432\u0438, \u0430\u0437 \u0449\u044f\u0445 \u0434\u0430 \u0433\u0438 \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0440\u0430\u043c, \u0430\u043a\u043e \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0445! \u041d\u0435 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0445\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u0432 \u0418\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438\u044f \u0437\u043d\u0430\u044f\u0442 \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f \u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043a\u0430\u043c \u0434\u0430 \u044f \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u044f\u043c \u043d\u0430 \u0438\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0430\u043d\u0446\u0438\u0442\u0435, \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0438 \u043a\u0443\u043b\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0442\u0430\u0437\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0441\u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0430! \u0427\u0430\u043e \u043e\u0442 \u0418\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0438\u044f!  +++$+++ ::Още трябва да ти благодаря! :) Измених имената на картата, която ми даде, и това беше по-лесна за да редактирам! Мисля че тя е хубава! Твоите карти ми много харесват, те са много хубави, аз щях да ги редактирам, ако можех! Не много хора в Италия знаят България и искам да я представям на италианците, историята и култарата на тази прекрасна страна! Чао от Италия! [[User:Bukkia|Bukkia]] 21:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

15074 +++$+++ EOZyo +++$+++ GoPurpleNGold24 +++$+++ 15074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-17 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.276766520E09 +++$+++ Hi, following the structure of other national teams, I've created, so far, the schedules, results and some statistics for the national team in [[Mexico national football team 2007]], [[Mexico national football team 2008|2008]], [[Mexico national football team 2009|2009]] and [[Mexico national football team 2010|2010]]. I don't know if the pages should be renamed to Mexico national football team XXXX results or keep it the way it is. I'm contacting you, because the information in those pages would be a duplicated of that found in [[Mexico national football team schedule and results]] and I'd like to know if you have any idea on how to start integrating both articles. Regards EOZyo ( +++$+++ Hi, following the structure of other national teams, I've created, so far, the schedules, results and some statistics for the national team in [[Mexico national football team 2007]], [[Mexico national football team 2008|2008]], [[Mexico national football team 2009|2009]] and [[Mexico national football team 2010|2010]]. I don't know if the pages should be renamed to Mexico national football team XXXX results or keep it the way it is. I'm contacting you, because the information in those pages would be a duplicated of that found in [[Mexico national football team schedule and results]] and I'd like to know if you have any idea on how to start integrating both articles. Regards EOZyo ([[User Talk:EOZyo|мѕğ]]) 02:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
15075 +++$+++ EOZyo +++$+++ GoPurpleNGold24 +++$+++ 15074 +++$+++ 15074 +++$+++ 2010-06-18 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.276860180E09 +++$+++ Sure, there's no problem, feel free to make the changes you want :); I see you changed the date format, i set that way because in [[Mexico national football team 2009|2009]] the names of the tournaments are too long and that messes up with the design, that's why I used the format 01-Jan-2009 just to save space; thanks for removing the extra \"[[ ]]\" from the tournament names in [[Mexico national football team 2007#Schedule|#Schedule]]. The worst of editing this kind of articles is to count the goals and yellow\/red cards because you need to check game by game U_U, do you have an idea of other information that should be added to it? I was thinking on adding the players who participated in the national team that year like in [[United States men's national soccer team 2009 results#Statistics]], let me know. Regards EOZyo ( +++$+++ :Sure, there's no problem, feel free to make the changes you want :); I see you changed the date format, i set that way because in [[Mexico national football team 2009|2009]] the names of the tournaments are too long and that messes up with the design, that's why I used the format 01-Jan-2009 just to save space; thanks for removing the extra "[[ ]]" from the tournament names in [[Mexico national football team 2007#Schedule|#Schedule]]. The worst of editing this kind of articles is to count the goals and yellow/red cards because you need to check game by game U_U, do you have an idea of other information that should be added to it? I was thinking on adding the players who participated in the national team that year like in [[United States men's national soccer team 2009 results#Statistics]], let me know. Regards EOZyo ([[User Talk:EOZyo|мѕğ]]) 04:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

277219 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-10 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.163213940E09 +++$+++ Alright, I've reverted myself. Sorry 'bout that! <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ Alright, I've reverted myself. Sorry 'bout that! <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 18:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
277220 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277219 +++$+++ 277219 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163214360E09 +++$+++ Hehe, I haven't got the chance to do that yet. ;-) <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :Hehe, I haven't got the chance to do that yet. ;-) <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 19:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

539365 +++$+++ Bukkia +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539365 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-08 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.197179400E09 +++$+++ \u0418\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043d\u0438 \u043c\u0435, \u043d\u043e \u043e\u0449\u0435 \u0442\u0440\u044f\u0431\u0432\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0442\u0435 \u0441\u043c\u0443\u0449\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043c. \u041d\u0430 \u043c\u0435\u043d\u0435 \u043c\u0438 \u0442\u0440\u044f\u0431\u0432\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0449\u0442\u0430 \u0442\u0438. \u041f\u0440\u0435\u0432\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0445 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u0434\u0438\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0430 \u043c\u0438 \u043d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u044f \u0438\u0437\u0434\u0430\u043c, \u0431\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u0441\u043a\u0430\u043b \u0434\u0430 \u043d\u044f\u043a\u0442\u043e \u044f \u043f\u043e\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438! \u041c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0448 \u043b\u0438 \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0448 \u0433\u0440\u0435\u0448\u043a\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043c\u0438? \u0422\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u043c\u043e\u044f [[User:Bukkia\/sandbox2|Sandbox]]... \u041c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0435 \u0438\u043c\u0430 \u043d\u044f\u043a\u043e\u043b\u043a\u043e \u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043b\u043d\u0438 \u0438 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0438 \u0433\u0440\u0435\u0448\u043a\u0438 \u043d\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0433\u0430 \u0434\u0430 \u0433\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044f... \u0418 \u0430\u043a\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0431\u0438\u0440\u0430\u0448 \u043a\u0430\u043a\u0432\u043e\u0442\u043e \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u0445, \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0448\u0438 \u043c\u0438! \u0423\u0442\u0440\u0435 \u0449\u0435 \u0442\u0438 \u043e\u0442\u0433\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0440\u044f! \u041c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0442\u0438 \u0431\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u044f \u0437\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0449\u0442\u0430 \u0438 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043e \u0442\u0438! \u0427\u0430\u043e!  +++$+++ Извини ме, но още трябва да те смущавам. На мене ми трябва помощта ти. Преведох статията за диалекта ми но преди да я издам, бих искал да някто я поправи! Можеш ли да поправиш грешките ми? Това е на моя [[User:Bukkia/sandbox2|Sandbox]]... Мисля че има няколко лексикални и граматични грешки но не мога да ги проверя... И ако не разбираш каквото написах, напиши ми! Утре ще ти отговоря! Много ти благодаря за помощта и времето ти! Чао! [[User:Bukkia|Bukkia]] ([[User talk:Bukkia|talk]]) 21:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
539366 +++$+++ Bukkia +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539365 +++$+++ 539365 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.197527940E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for your help! The page is already on the Bulgarian Wikipedia! I was translating the English page about Italian language for Bulgarian Wiki, but... I see your corrections and I think it's better if I wait for a better knowledge of your language ^^.. If you want to see it, it's on my SandboxIII! \u041c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0442\u0438 \u0431\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u044f \u0437\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0449\u0442\u0430 \u0442\u0438! Ciao!  +++$+++ :Thank you very much for your help! The page is already on the Bulgarian Wikipedia! I was translating the English page about Italian language for Bulgarian Wiki, but... I see your corrections and I think it's better if I wait for a better knowledge of your language ^^.. If you want to see it, it's on my SandboxIII! Много ти благодаря за помощта ти! Ciao! [[User:Bukkia|Bukkia]] ([[User talk:Bukkia|talk]]) 22:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

277222 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-10 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.163220060E09 +++$+++ Trouble is, Tekleni is a good personal friend of mine. I feel pretty bad about doing this, and would rather recuse myself from escalating this further. :-(  +++$+++ Trouble is, Tekleni is a good personal friend of mine. I feel pretty bad about doing this, and would rather recuse myself from escalating this further. :-( [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 20:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
277223 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277222 +++$+++ 277222 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.163221140E09 +++$+++ Same here, I don't know what the hell he is thinking.... <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :Same here, I don't know what the hell he is thinking.... <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 20:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

277224 +++$+++ Konstantinos Palaiologos +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-10 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.163221260E09 +++$+++ Oy, you, the lawyer guy: WTF are you interfering for? This has nothing whatsoever to do with you.-- +++$+++ Oy, you, the lawyer guy: WTF are you interfering for? This has nothing whatsoever to do with you.--[[User:Konstantinos Palaiologos|Konstantinos Palaiologos]] 21:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
277225 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277224 +++$+++ 277224 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.163223480E09 +++$+++ By the way, on the [[Bulgarian Human Rights in Macedonia]] page both sides were abusive, that's why I reverted to that earlier version. Hope you don't mind.  +++$+++ :By the way, on the [[Bulgarian Human Rights in Macedonia]] page both sides were abusive, that's why I reverted to that earlier version. Hope you don't mind. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 21:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

570492 +++$+++ Ultraexactzz +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-05 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.220650680E09 +++$+++ I caught it - [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=236453041 and noted it at AN]. Are there any other images we need to work on? I saw a list at commons, but the images we're having issues with here aren't on it.  +++$+++ I caught it - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=236453041 and noted it at AN]. Are there any other images we need to work on? I saw a list at commons, but the images we're having issues with here aren't on it. [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 14:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
570493 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570492 +++$+++ 570492 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.220652360E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 15:06, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

539371 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-14 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.200358020E09 +++$+++ Hello Todor, I came across your image upload log by chance today and found a few problems. I've tagged a couple of your older ones from 2006 as \"replaceable fair use\" (architecture and scenery photographs are almost always replaceable). Also, I notice you apparently uploaded quite a number from N. Gruev's site [http:\/\/www.pbase.com\/ngruev here]. Unfortunately, the author states there that his images are not for commercial re-use, so we can't use them, unless you could contact him and convince him to release them under a different license (cc-by-sa or GFDL, must include license for commercial re-use). Let me know if you see a chance to get that permission from him.  +++$+++ Hello Todor, I came across your image upload log by chance today and found a few problems. I've tagged a couple of your older ones from 2006 as "replaceable fair use" (architecture and scenery photographs are almost always replaceable). Also, I notice you apparently uploaded quite a number from N. Gruev's site [http://www.pbase.com/ngruev here]. Unfortunately, the author states there that his images are not for commercial re-use, so we can't use them, unless you could contact him and convince him to release them under a different license (cc-by-sa or GFDL, must include license for commercial re-use). Let me know if you see a chance to get that permission from him. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 16:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
539372 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539371 +++$+++ 539371 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.200358380E09 +++$+++ P.S. In fact, I now see the page on bg-wiki that is linked from {{tl|NGruev}} [[:bg:\u0423\u0438\u043a\u0438\u043f\u0435\u0434\u0438\u044f:\u0420\u0430\u0437\u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0437\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u043c\u0430\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0430\u043b\u0438\/\u041d\u0438\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0430 \u0413\u0440\u0443\u0435\u0432]]. That page is confusing: It states there that he licensed them under GFDL, but only for use on Wikipedia. That's a contradiction in terms. If it's for Wikipedia only, it isn't the GFDL. I can't read the original mail by him that is included in that page, can you translate? It seems that when he wrote it he may not have been aware what the GFDL actually said. This looks like one unfortunate mess to clean up. :-(  +++$+++ :P.S. In fact, I now see the page on bg-wiki that is linked from {{tl|NGruev}} [[:bg:Уикипедия:Разрешения за ползване на материали/Никола Груев]]. That page is confusing: It states there that he licensed them under GFDL, but only for use on Wikipedia. That's a contradiction in terms. If it's for Wikipedia only, it isn't the GFDL. I can't read the original mail by him that is included in that page, can you translate? It seems that when he wrote it he may not have been aware what the GFDL actually said. This looks like one unfortunate mess to clean up. :-( [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 16:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
539373 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539371 +++$+++ 539372 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.200360060E09 +++$+++ Nevermind, it seems the Gruev issue has been clarified. I'm glad, because otherwise we'd have had a carnage of image deletions...  +++$+++ ::Nevermind, it seems the Gruev issue has been clarified. I'm glad, because otherwise we'd have had a carnage of image deletions... [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 17:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

277230 +++$+++ Dalbury +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-14 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.163504520E09 +++$+++ My RfA passed with a tally of 71\/1\/0. Thank you very much for your support. I hope that my performance as an admin will not disappoint you. Please let me know if you see me doing anything inappropriate. As for your concern about my approach to the editing of policy pages, while I still feel that policy pages ought to be the most stable pages on WP, for more than one reason I withdrew from participation on policy pages a couple of months ago. -- '''<font color=\"navy\"> +++$+++ My RfA passed with a tally of 71/1/0. Thank you very much for your support. I hope that my performance as an admin will not disappoint you. Please let me know if you see me doing anything inappropriate. As for your concern about my approach to the editing of policy pages, while I still feel that policy pages ought to be the most stable pages on WP, for more than one reason I withdrew from participation on policy pages a couple of months ago. -- '''<font color="navy">[[User talk:Dalbury|Donald Albury]]</font>''' 03:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
277231 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277230 +++$+++ 277230 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.163545080E09 +++$+++ As for just one colour, I don't like the idea, since it doesn't differentiate the nations very well, and in the case of the Isle of Man, may at first glance make someone not familiar with the concept think that the sixth nation is Northern Ireland and that the Isle of Man is just some island belonging to Scotland or Northern Ireland, or whatever. <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ :As for just one colour, I don't like the idea, since it doesn't differentiate the nations very well, and in the case of the Isle of Man, may at first glance make someone not familiar with the concept think that the sixth nation is Northern Ireland and that the Isle of Man is just some island belonging to Scotland or Northern Ireland, or whatever. <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="blue">OzLawyer</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 14:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

594077 +++$+++ Gladys j cortez +++$+++ Gladys j cortez +++$+++ 594077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-05 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.273095960E09 +++$+++ See, this is just the kind of...ahem...STUFF... which illustrates to me why and how WP is circling the drain. Xeno, thank you for the defense; Tznkai, you sum it up as eloquently as possible. (And I understand a little better now why some admins are willing to speak their piece and lose their bit, rather than quietly swallow another ridiculous, ill-considered blob of navel-gazing policy-wank. Fortunately I have a fairly well-developed ability to resist temptation, because the above edit came REAL close to just setting me off.)  +++$+++ See, this is just the kind of...ahem...STUFF... which illustrates to me why and how WP is circling the drain. Xeno, thank you for the defense; Tznkai, you sum it up as eloquently as possible. (And I understand a little better now why some admins are willing to speak their piece and lose their bit, rather than quietly swallow another ridiculous, ill-considered blob of navel-gazing policy-wank. Fortunately I have a fairly well-developed ability to resist temptation, because the above edit came REAL close to just setting me off.) [[User talk:Gladys j cortez|GJC]]  14:46, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
594078 +++$+++ Ks0stm +++$+++ Gladys j cortez +++$+++ 594077 +++$+++ 594077 +++$+++ 2010-05-05 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.273113240E09 +++$+++ GJC, whenever I find stuff starting to get quite a bit off the mark with areas of the project, I pack up and move to a different area of the project. If new page patrol is giving me fits, I might move along to work on some lovely articles needing help such as [[wall cloud]] or [[severe weather]]. Perhaps, just maybe, you could find some obscure corner of the project to work on for a while where people like Daedalus won't bother you. I for one would suggest the meteorology areas (although I may have a bias... :-) ...who knows?), but you may find some other area of the project more to your taste. Just find that one speck of Wikipedia where you can have fun without being bothered by...them pesky people. With over 3 million articles, there has to be at least one you can make shine brilliantly without being bothered. [[w:User:Ks0stm|<font color=\"009900\" ><b>Ks0stm<\/b><\/font>]] <span style=\"border:1px solid #ffa500;background:#ffce7b;\"><small>If you reply here, please leave me a {{[[Template:Talkback|Talkback]]}} message on  +++$+++ :GJC, whenever I find stuff starting to get quite a bit off the mark with areas of the project, I pack up and move to a different area of the project. If new page patrol is giving me fits, I might move along to work on some lovely articles needing help such as [[wall cloud]] or [[severe weather]]. Perhaps, just maybe, you could find some obscure corner of the project to work on for a while where people like Daedalus won't bother you. I for one would suggest the meteorology areas (although I may have a bias... :-) ...who knows?), but you may find some other area of the project more to your taste. Just find that one speck of Wikipedia where you can have fun without being bothered by...them pesky people. With over 3 million articles, there has to be at least one you can make shine brilliantly without being bothered. [[w:User:Ks0stm|<font color="009900" ><b>Ks0stm</b></font>]] <span style="border:1px solid #ffa500;background:#ffce7b;"><small>If you reply here, please leave me a {{[[Template:Talkback|Talkback]]}} message on [[User talk:Ks0stm|my talk page]].</small></span> 19:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
594079 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Gladys j cortez +++$+++ 594077 +++$+++ 594077 +++$+++ 2010-05-06 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.273204200E09 +++$+++ Yes, I made a mistake, but is that reason to personally attack me?  I politely reminded you of what I thought to be a policy violation.  There was no need to treat me like that.  I made a mistake, so instead of insulting me, why don't you give me the same courtesy, and remind me back.\u2014 ''' +++$+++ :Yes, I made a mistake, but is that reason to personally attack me?  I politely reminded you of what I thought to be a policy violation.  There was no need to treat me like that.  I made a mistake, so instead of insulting me, why don't you give me the same courtesy, and remind me back.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|<font color="Blue">dαlus</font>]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 20:50, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
594080 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ Gladys j cortez +++$+++ 594077 +++$+++ 594079 +++$+++ 2010-05-06 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.273204320E09 +++$+++ The ''\"must\"'' seemed a little less than polite (which is why I said \"chill\"). Jmho. This is a minor matter. In future you might look at some of the user's other talk page contributions to ensure it wasn't a one-off mistake. \u2013 +++$+++ ::The ''"must"'' seemed a little less than polite (which is why I said "chill"). Jmho. This is a minor matter. In future you might look at some of the user's other talk page contributions to ensure it wasn't a one-off mistake. –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:52, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
594081 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Gladys j cortez +++$+++ 594077 +++$+++ 594080 +++$+++ 2010-05-06 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.273206120E09 +++$+++ I will do that in the future.\u2014 ''' +++$+++ :::I will do that in the future.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|<font color="Blue">dαlus</font>]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 21:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

15089 +++$+++ emerson7 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15089 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-14 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.252973580E09 +++$+++ regarding your inquiry, i made my opinion known [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Jredmond#Mediawiki:Newarticletext here]. cheers! -- +++$+++ regarding your inquiry, i made my opinion known [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jredmond#Mediawiki:Newarticletext here]. cheers! --[[User talk:emerson7|emerson7]] 17:13, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
15090 +++$+++  +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15089 +++$+++ 15089 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks, much appreciated. ''Jan1nad'' 20:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ :Thanks, much appreciated. ''Jan1nad'' 20:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

277234 +++$+++ David Kernow +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-14 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.163554200E09 +++$+++ Best wishes,  +++$+++ Best wishes, [[User:David Kernow|David Kernow]] <span style="font-size:90%;">([[User talk:David Kernow|talk]])</span> 17:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
277235 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277234 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.163557800E09 +++$+++ ''...in using \"''significant'' territory\", we're explicitly removing from notes the possibility of things like small off-shore islands, as they wouldn't be significant...  <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ :: ''...in using "''significant'' territory", we're explicitly removing from notes the possibility of things like small off-shore islands, as they wouldn't be significant...  <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="blue">OzLawyer</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 18:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
277236 +++$+++ David Kernow +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277234 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.163566260E09 +++$+++ Yours,  +++$+++ :: Yours, [[User:David Kernow|David]] <span style="font-size:90%;">([[User talk:David Kernow|talk]])</span> 20:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

15092 +++$+++ MarmadukePercy +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-15 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.255670520E09 +++$+++ Hello. Just wanted to say I'm glad to see such a scrupulous researcher here. I've noticed your other edits in the area, and they've all looked good. As I say, one can't ever have too many sources, can one? :-) Best regards,  +++$+++ Hello. Just wanted to say I'm glad to see such a scrupulous researcher here. I've noticed your other edits in the area, and they've all looked good. As I say, one can't ever have too many sources, can one? :-) Best regards, [[User:MarmadukePercy|MarmadukePercy]] ([[User talk:MarmadukePercy|talk]]) 22:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
15093 +++$+++ MarmadukePercy +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15092 +++$+++ 15092 +++$+++ 2009-10-18 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.255923720E09 +++$+++ Hello, and thanks for your message. You seem to be doing great. The Croxall confusion has bedeviled me as well over the years, and my reading in the matter hasn't rendered things much clearer. I will make a concerted effort to try to straighten this out as best I can, but I think you're onto something with the Edingale thing. The way the place was carved up reminds one of the weird electoral districts one sometimes sees in the United States as a result of gerrymandering! lol. In any case, I have no doubt we'll sort it over time &ndash; if it can be sorted. And, please, if you have any questions about this place, don't hesitate to ask. And I won't take it personally if you don't take *all* my advice. One should never accept all the advice proferred anyway. :-) Best regards,  +++$+++ :Hello, and thanks for your message. You seem to be doing great. The Croxall confusion has bedeviled me as well over the years, and my reading in the matter hasn't rendered things much clearer. I will make a concerted effort to try to straighten this out as best I can, but I think you're onto something with the Edingale thing. The way the place was carved up reminds one of the weird electoral districts one sometimes sees in the United States as a result of gerrymandering! lol. In any case, I have no doubt we'll sort it over time &ndash; if it can be sorted. And, please, if you have any questions about this place, don't hesitate to ask. And I won't take it personally if you don't take *all* my advice. One should never accept all the advice proferred anyway. :-) Best regards, [[User:MarmadukePercy|MarmadukePercy]] ([[User talk:MarmadukePercy|talk]]) 20:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

570494 +++$+++ Sardanaphalus +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-08 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.220905320E09 +++$+++ Your revert entirely understandable given [[Template talk:Documentation#Heading fix|the current discussion at Template talk:Documentation]], of which I was unaware before editing. I'll leave the page as is.  +++$+++ Your revert entirely understandable given [[Template talk:Documentation#Heading fix|the current discussion at Template talk:Documentation]], of which I was unaware before editing. I'll leave the page as is. [[User:Sardanaphalus|Sardanaphalus]] ([[User talk:Sardanaphalus|talk]]) 13:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
570495 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570494 +++$+++ 570494 +++$+++ 2008-09-08 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.220906220E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 13:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

15094 +++$+++ Spinningspark +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15094 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-28 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.259478660E09 +++$+++ I am happy to give you advice but you have not said what it is that you want to achieve.  The article needs to be deleted to enable [[Christopher Turnor (judge)]] to be moved to [[Christopher Turnor]].  There is no article for [[Christopher Turnor (politician)]] so there is no need for disambiguation in the titles and no need for a dab page to distinguish them.  After the article is moved a link could be maintained to [[South Lincolnshire (UK Parliament constituency)]], where the politician is mentioned, with a hatnote.  But even that is not very worthwile because the article gives little more information than that he existed.  +++$+++ I am happy to give you advice but you have not said what it is that you want to achieve.  The article needs to be deleted to enable [[Christopher Turnor (judge)]] to be moved to [[Christopher Turnor]].  There is no article for [[Christopher Turnor (politician)]] so there is no need for disambiguation in the titles and no need for a dab page to distinguish them.  After the article is moved a link could be maintained to [[South Lincolnshire (UK Parliament constituency)]], where the politician is mentioned, with a hatnote.  But even that is not very worthwile because the article gives little more information than that he existed. [[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#FFF090;color:#00C000">'''Sp<font style="background:#FFF0A0;color:#80C000">in<font style="color:#C08000">ni</font></font><font style="color:#C00000">ng</font></font><font style="color:#2820F0">Spark'''</font>]] 23:11, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
15095 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15094 +++$+++ 15094 +++$+++ 2009-11-30 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.259604060E09 +++$+++ Thank you, you have answered the question and given me the advice. Now I understand.  +++$+++ :Thank you, you have answered the question and given me the advice. Now I understand. [[User:Jan1nad|<span style="color:#009d43;font-weight:bold">''Jan<span style="font-size:80%;">1</span>naD''</span>]] <sup>(''[[User talk:Jan1nad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jan1nad|contrib]]'')</sup> 10:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

15097 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-23 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.269390540E09 +++$+++ Just a note to say how impressed I am by the work you're doing here.  +++$+++ Just a note to say how impressed I am by the work you're doing here. [[User:Jan1nad|<span style="color:#009d43;font-weight:bold">''Jan<span style="font-size:80%;">1</span>naD''</span>]] <sup>(''[[User talk:Jan1nad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jan1nad|contrib]]'')</sup> 17:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
15098 +++$+++ Storye book +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15097 +++$+++ 15097 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.269391140E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  I've been terrified that people will complain that I'm trying too hard.  I've tried to put the template on every page which looks as if it is probably the right one for the lost village concerned (reservoirs, C18 estates, Highland clearances and sea erosion are a clue).  The result is that a few articles are probably not getting a template when they should have one, and a few are getting the template inappropriately.  I've tried not to make too many guesses. But it's useful in that the template does show us that our most obvious gap is the Highland Clearances. I hope it will encourage some local people to fill the gap.  The project does need a lot of assistance from contributors with local knowledge. It's a fun thing to do, though, as it helps people see what lost settlements are around their own area in the UK.-- +++$+++ : Thanks!  I've been terrified that people will complain that I'm trying too hard.  I've tried to put the template on every page which looks as if it is probably the right one for the lost village concerned (reservoirs, C18 estates, Highland clearances and sea erosion are a clue).  The result is that a few articles are probably not getting a template when they should have one, and a few are getting the template inappropriately.  I've tried not to make too many guesses. But it's useful in that the template does show us that our most obvious gap is the Highland Clearances. I hope it will encourage some local people to fill the gap.  The project does need a lot of assistance from contributors with local knowledge. It's a fun thing to do, though, as it helps people see what lost settlements are around their own area in the UK.--[[User:Storye book|Storye book]] ([[User talk:Storye book|talk]]) 17:39, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

15099 +++$+++ Everard Proudfoot +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15099 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-01 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.283404740E09 +++$+++ It was your user page.  :)   +++$+++ It was your user page.  :)  [[User:Everard Proudfoot|Everard Proudfoot]] ([[User talk:Everard Proudfoot|talk]]) 22:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
15100 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15099 +++$+++ 15099 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.283404860E09 +++$+++ It's late ;-)  +++$+++ :It's late ;-) [[User:Jan1nad|<span style="color:#009d43;font-weight:bold">''Jan<span style="font-size:80%;">1</span>naD''</span>]] <sup>(''[[User talk:Jan1nad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jan1nad|contrib]]'')</sup> 22:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

15101 +++$+++ 216.249.58.125 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15101 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-10 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.289440560E09 +++$+++ Hi. You undid mt edits as you though they were vandlism. They were not. Most scholars believe the \"Gospel of Matthew\" was not written by Matthew. Matthew's Gospel was probably the Gospel of the Hebrews.ref. The Hebrew Gospel by James Edwards . . . [[Special:Contributions\/216.249.58.125|216.249.58.125]] ( +++$+++ Hi. You undid mt edits as you though they were vandlism. They were not. Most scholars believe the "Gospel of Matthew" was not written by Matthew. Matthew's Gospel was probably the Gospel of the Hebrews.ref. The Hebrew Gospel by James Edwards . . . [[Special:Contributions/216.249.58.125|216.249.58.125]] ([[User talk:216.249.58.125|talk]]) 17:56, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
15102 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15101 +++$+++ 15101 +++$+++ 2010-11-11 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.289496480E09 +++$+++ Yes, and Shakespeare's plays were not written by William Shakespeare. ?  +++$+++ :Yes, and Shakespeare's plays were not written by William Shakespeare. ? [[User:Jan1nad|<span style="color:#009d43;font-weight:bold">''Jan<span style="font-size:80%;">1</span>naD''</span>]] <sup>(''[[User talk:Jan1nad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jan1nad|contrib]]'')</sup> 09:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

539390 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-06 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.212814740E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0439! \u041e\u0442 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435 \u043d\u0435 \u0441\u044a\u043c \u0442\u0438 \u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043b ;-) \u0414\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0449\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0435\u0448 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435 \u0434\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043e\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0448 \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043f\u043e\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043c\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0432\u043e\u0434 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0438\u0445\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u0422\u0440\u0430\u044f\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0438 \u0432\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0432 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0437\u0430 [[Samuel of Bulgaria|\u0421\u0430\u043c\u0443\u0438\u043b]]? \u041e\u0441\u0432\u0435\u043d \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0432\u0438\u0436 \u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u0435\u0447\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u0438\u0437\u0431\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f \u0438 \u043c\u0438 \u043a\u0430\u0436\u0438 \u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0431\u0438 \u0433\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0443\u0432\u0430\u043b \u0437\u0430 \u043d\u0435\u044f, \u0430\u043a\u043e (\u043f\u0430\u043a) \u044f \u043d\u043e\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0440\u0430\u043c (\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0431\u0438\u0440\u0430 \u0441\u0435, \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e \u0430\u043a\u043e \u0442\u0438 \u0441\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0430\u0432\u0430 :-) \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438, -- +++$+++ Здравей! От доста време не съм ти писал ;-) Дали ще успееш време да пооправиш нескопосания ми превод на стиха за Траянови врата в статията за [[Samuel of Bulgaria|Самуил]]? Освен това виж дали вече става за избрана статия и ми кажи дали би гласувал за нея, ако (пак) я номинирам (разбира се, само ако ти се занимава :-) Поздрави, --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] ([[User talk:Gligan|talk]]) 21:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
539391 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539390 +++$+++ 539390 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 09:39:00 +++$+++ 1.213115940E09 +++$+++ \u0427\u0443\u0434\u0435\u0441\u043d\u043e, \u0431\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u044f \u0442\u0438. \u0429\u0435 \u043f\u0438\u0448\u0430, \u043a\u043e\u0433\u0430\u0442\u043e \u044f \u043d\u043e\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0440\u0430\u043c. \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438, -- +++$+++ :Чудесно, благодаря ти. Ще пиша, когато я номинирам. Поздрави, --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] ([[User talk:Gligan|talk]]) 09:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

15103 +++$+++ Short Brigade Harvester Boris +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15103 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-02 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.291331940E09 +++$+++ It looks weird to an outsider, but just two comrades playing games.  +++$+++ It looks weird to an outsider, but just two comrades playing games. [[User:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|Short Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 15:19, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
15104 +++$+++ Stephan Schulz +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15103 +++$+++ 15103 +++$+++ 2010-12-02 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.291333560E09 +++$+++ Don't listen to Boris. He is a agitator of the <s>worst<\/s>best kind! --  +++$+++ :Don't listen to Boris. He is a agitator of the <s>worst</s>best kind! -- [[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] 15:46, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
15105 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15103 +++$+++ 15104 +++$+++ 2010-12-02 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.291347420E09 +++$+++ Agreed. Go ahead and pick on Boris. He never gave ''me'' any presents. That proves he is a vandal. Srsly. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]<\/sup> +++$+++ :: Agreed. Go ahead and pick on Boris. He never gave ''me'' any presents. That proves he is a vandal. Srsly. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup>[[User:Heimstern/Ignoring incivility|Advice]]</small> 19:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

277248 +++$+++ Weapon X (de) +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-10 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.163198700E09 +++$+++ I can remember something like that, but can't find the place where it was written.. can somebody help? -  +++$+++ I can remember something like that, but can't find the place where it was written.. can somebody help? - [[User:Weapon X (de)|Weapon X (de)]] 14:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
277249 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277248 +++$+++ 277248 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.163200560E09 +++$+++ Policy point 9 at [[WP:FU]] says you can't put these logos here either (even temporarily).  I have removed the first four since they are already used on the articles for the teams, and so aren't in danger of deletion.  The other four have to go as well\u2014just save them yourself if you feel they're going to be deleted, and if you create pages for those teams, you can put them on them as well. <sub>\u2514<\/sub>&nbsp;<sup>''' +++$+++ :Policy point 9 at [[WP:FU]] says you can't put these logos here either (even temporarily).  I have removed the first four since they are already used on the articles for the teams, and so aren't in danger of deletion.  The other four have to go as well—just save them yourself if you feel they're going to be deleted, and if you create pages for those teams, you can put them on them as well. <sub>└</sub>&nbsp;<sup>'''[[User:Osgoodelawyer|<font color="blue">OzLawyer</font>]]'''</sup>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<sub>''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Osgoodelawyer|talk]]</font>''</sub>&nbsp;<sup>┐</sup> 15:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
277250 +++$+++ Weapon X (de) +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277248 +++$+++ 277249 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.163202060E09 +++$+++ Another question: If I'll get the permission of the logo owner, to show the logos also on the league-article, would that make a difference?    - Greetings  +++$+++ :: Another question: If I'll get the permission of the logo owner, to show the logos also on the league-article, would that make a difference?    - Greetings [[User:Weapon X (de)|Weapon X (de)]] 15:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
277251 +++$+++ Osgoodelawyer +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277248 +++$+++ 277250 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.164065280E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure about the legality of what you're proposing. I would assume that if you got permission and sent that permission to Wikimedia by following the procedure at [[WP:COPYREQ]], then you could include the logos on the league article. But I'm not certain, since such images on Wikipedia are usually allowed through the owner licencing the images under GFDL or some other copyleft licence, and the league is obviously not going to do that (it would mean others could take those logos and use them for their own purposes, including making money off them). I would suggest you ask somewhere at [[WP:RFCA]] (probably [[Wikipedia talk:Copyrights]]). \u2514  +++$+++ :::I'm not sure about the legality of what you're proposing. I would assume that if you got permission and sent that permission to Wikimedia by following the procedure at [[WP:COPYREQ]], then you could include the logos on the league article. But I'm not certain, since such images on Wikipedia are usually allowed through the owner licencing the images under GFDL or some other copyleft licence, and the league is obviously not going to do that (it would mean others could take those logos and use them for their own purposes, including making money off them). I would suggest you ask somewhere at [[WP:RFCA]] (probably [[Wikipedia talk:Copyrights]]). └ [[User:Osgoodelawyer|OzLawyer]] ┐ 15:28, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
277252 +++$+++ Weapon X (de) +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277248 +++$+++ 277251 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.164071940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the references! -  +++$+++ :::: Thanks for the references! - [[User:Weapon X (de)|Weapon X (de)]] 17:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

15106 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15106 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-14 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.297720980E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for doing what you just did on the above article. I'm running out of reverts and cannot seem to get through to the guy (who would appear to be the sculptor anyway, so probably COI). He keeps inserting inappropriate images and has been doing for at least a month or so, on and off. Can you keep an eye on it? He may get bored soon! -  +++$+++ Hi, thanks for doing what you just did on the above article. I'm running out of reverts and cannot seem to get through to the guy (who would appear to be the sculptor anyway, so probably COI). He keeps inserting inappropriate images and has been doing for at least a month or so, on and off. Can you keep an eye on it? He may get bored soon! - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 14:03, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
15107 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15106 +++$+++ 15106 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.297721040E09 +++$+++ Do you think it's time for a PROD?  +++$+++ :Do you think it's time for a PROD? [[User:Jan1nad|<span style="color:#009d43;font-weight:bold">''Jan<span style="font-size:80%;">1</span>naD''</span>]] <sup>(''[[User talk:Jan1nad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jan1nad|contrib]]'')</sup> 14:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
15108 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15106 +++$+++ 15106 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.297721160E09 +++$+++ Sorry, a couple of years. I'll guarantee the huge thing he put on the bottom of the page is copyrighted, despite what he says on Commons. Oxbridge Colleges always copyright their own house journals etc - I should know, because I proof-read a couple of them. -  +++$+++ :Sorry, a couple of years. I'll guarantee the huge thing he put on the bottom of the page is copyrighted, despite what he says on Commons. Oxbridge Colleges always copyright their own house journals etc - I should know, because I proof-read a couple of them. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 14:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
15109 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15106 +++$+++ 15108 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.297721160E09 +++$+++ Probably time for a PROD, yes. It is becoming a list. -  +++$+++ ::Probably time for a PROD, yes. It is becoming a list. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 14:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
15110 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15106 +++$+++ 15109 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.297722420E09 +++$+++ Hold off. He is now talking on the article talk page. I've replied. And, yes, it is he. -  +++$+++ :::Hold off. He is now talking on the article talk page. I've replied. And, yes, it is he. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 14:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
15111 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15106 +++$+++ 15109 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.297722960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that, you got there ahead of me - though for some reason I could only see your comments on the talk page in edit mode - they only appeared in normal view after I did a null edit. Strange.  +++$+++ :::Thanks for that, you got there ahead of me - though for some reason I could only see your comments on the talk page in edit mode - they only appeared in normal view after I did a null edit. Strange. [[User:Jan1nad|<span style="color:#009d43;font-weight:bold">''Jan<span style="font-size:80%;">1</span>naD''</span>]] <sup>(''[[User talk:Jan1nad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jan1nad|contrib]]'')</sup> 14:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
15112 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15106 +++$+++ 15111 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.297723140E09 +++$+++ There are a lot of lags at the mo. Thought I'd lost a huge & very messy edit earlier but thankfully had CTRL-A'd and CTRL-C'd before hitting Save. -  +++$+++ ::::There are a lot of lags at the mo. Thought I'd lost a huge & very messy edit earlier but thankfully had CTRL-A'd and CTRL-C'd before hitting Save. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 14:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

277253 +++$+++ Earl Andrew +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-20 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.164070680E09 +++$+++ I did not revert, I just changed it. Wyoming is the postal address, and makes more sense then assigning an entire township as being a county seat. I think we should stick with mailing addresses, especially considering some census divisions are single-tier. --  +++$+++ I did not revert, I just changed it. Wyoming is the postal address, and makes more sense then assigning an entire township as being a county seat. I think we should stick with mailing addresses, especially considering some census divisions are single-tier. -- [[User:Earl Andrew|Earl Andrew]] - [[User talk:Earl Andrew|talk]] 16:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
277254 +++$+++ Earl Andrew +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277253 +++$+++ 277253 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.164071400E09 +++$+++ If the region uses Bramalea, then we should use it. They may not have borders, but unless the administrative offices are in the middle of nowhere, they are going to be in a community which will be indisputably known as being that community. Again, this comes to consistency. If we are going to label the county seat of Prince Edward County as Picton, we should do a similar thing with Lambton County. Whatever the municipality says is their seat (clearly Lambton says \"Wyoming\", then we can source that. It does not mention Plympton-Wyoming as being the seat at all. How can we source that? --  +++$+++ : If the region uses Bramalea, then we should use it. They may not have borders, but unless the administrative offices are in the middle of nowhere, they are going to be in a community which will be indisputably known as being that community. Again, this comes to consistency. If we are going to label the county seat of Prince Edward County as Picton, we should do a similar thing with Lambton County. Whatever the municipality says is their seat (clearly Lambton says "Wyoming", then we can source that. It does not mention Plympton-Wyoming as being the seat at all. How can we source that? -- [[User:Earl Andrew|Earl Andrew]] - [[User talk:Earl Andrew|talk]] 17:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
277255 +++$+++ Earl Andrew +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277253 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.164072120E09 +++$+++ County seat is just another term for where the administrative building is. We are allowed to do that I think. --  +++$+++ ::::County seat is just another term for where the administrative building is. We are allowed to do that I think. -- [[User:Earl Andrew|Earl Andrew]] - [[User talk:Earl Andrew|talk]] 17:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

277256 +++$+++ snowolfd4 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-24 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.164422160E09 +++$+++ And if you don't like the word \"terrorist\" rename all the pages I listed in the AFD discussion, and everything else that has the word terrorist in it. Also search for words like \"terrorist\", \"terrorism\" etc on Wikipedia and remove every single incident that is categorized as \"terrorist\". ALSO nominate the Terrorist Attack template for deletion. Unless you do all of these, you will clearly be displaying duplicity in your acts, and your POV in favour of the LTTE. -- +++$+++ And if you don't like the word "terrorist" rename all the pages I listed in the AFD discussion, and everything else that has the word terrorist in it. Also search for words like "terrorist", "terrorism" etc on Wikipedia and remove every single incident that is categorized as "terrorist". ALSO nominate the Terrorist Attack template for deletion. Unless you do all of these, you will clearly be displaying duplicity in your acts, and your POV in favour of the LTTE. --[[User:snowolfd4|<font color="#9696A0" face="Tahoma">'''snowolf'''</font><font color="#0A0096" face="tahoma">'''D4'''</font>]]<sup>( <font color="#339966" face="Constantia">[[User_Talk:Snowolfd4| '''talk''']]</font> / <font color="#CC0099" face="Constantia">[[Special:Emailuser/Snowolfd4| '''@''']]</font> )</sup> 18:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
277257 +++$+++ snowolfd4 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277256 +++$+++ 277256 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.164423180E09 +++$+++ As for you POV, I'm sorry to make accusations, but unfortunately comments like \"indeed, it has even been accused--in some cases likely justifiably--of blaming its own soldiers' crazed attacks on the LTTE\" gives it away. -- +++$+++ :As for you POV, I'm sorry to make accusations, but unfortunately comments like "indeed, it has even been accused--in some cases likely justifiably--of blaming its own soldiers' crazed attacks on the LTTE" gives it away. --[[User:snowolfd4|<font color="#9696A0" face="Tahoma">'''snowolf'''</font><font color="#0A0096" face="tahoma">'''D4'''</font>]]<sup>( <font color="#339966" face="Constantia">[[User_Talk:Snowolfd4| '''talk''']]</font> / <font color="#CC0099" face="Constantia">[[Special:Emailuser/Snowolfd4| '''@''']]</font> )</sup> 18:53, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

15113 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-14 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.297723680E09 +++$+++ ... Do you know of any warning template I can use to tell off a kid who left f'ing and b'ing abuse on my ''user'' page. He didn't sign it but it's there in the history (I deleted the comments). -  +++$+++ ... Do you know of any warning template I can use to tell off a kid who left f'ing and b'ing abuse on my ''user'' page. He didn't sign it but it's there in the history (I deleted the comments). - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 14:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
15114 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15113 +++$+++ 15113 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.297724820E09 +++$+++ I don't know if it helps, but I have [[Wikipedia:Template messages\/User talk namespace|Template messages]] on a shortcut. Maybe \"Personal attack directed at editors\"? If they do it often enough, and build up enough warning messages on the talk page, they'll simply get blocked.  +++$+++ :I don't know if it helps, but I have [[Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace|Template messages]] on a shortcut. Maybe "Personal attack directed at editors"? If they do it often enough, and build up enough warning messages on the talk page, they'll simply get blocked. [[User:Jan1nad|<span style="color:#009d43;font-weight:bold">''Jan<span style="font-size:80%;">1</span>naD''</span>]] <sup>(''[[User talk:Jan1nad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jan1nad|contrib]]'')</sup> 15:07, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
15115 +++$+++ Sitush +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15113 +++$+++ 15114 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.297725360E09 +++$+++ Done. Thanks. -  +++$+++ ::Done. Thanks. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 15:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

277258 +++$+++ Foobaz +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-25 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.164447660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your feedback.  +++$+++ Thanks for your feedback. [[User:Foobaz|Foobaz]]&middot;[[User talk:foobaz|o&lt;]] 01:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
277259 +++$+++ Foobaz +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277258 +++$+++ 277258 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.164448140E09 +++$+++ Cool, i fully support your work to standardize on your preferred style. I guess i shouldn't use the spiffy new [[:Image:Maritimes-Canada-region.png]] i just made then. :-)  +++$+++ :Cool, i fully support your work to standardize on your preferred style. I guess i shouldn't use the spiffy new [[:Image:Maritimes-Canada-region.png]] i just made then. :-) [[User:Foobaz|Foobaz]]&middot;[[User talk:foobaz|o&lt;]] 01:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

15116 +++$+++ Reaper Eternal +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-22 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.300833000E09 +++$+++ Hi, you probably don't know this, but the guidelines for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]] mention that articles should not be tagged as A1 or A3 moments after creation since the new user may not have added all of his content in the first edit. ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Countryside_Lake&action=history The article].) Additionally, an article having only the title of the article as its content is tagged under A3, not A1. Thanks for your work!  +++$+++ Hi, you probably don't know this, but the guidelines for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]] mention that articles should not be tagged as A1 or A3 moments after creation since the new user may not have added all of his content in the first edit. ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Countryside_Lake&action=history The article].) Additionally, an article having only the title of the article as its content is tagged under A3, not A1. Thanks for your work! [[User:Reaper Eternal|Reaper Eternal]] ([[User talk:Reaper Eternal|talk]]) 15:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
15117 +++$+++ Ponyo +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15116 +++$+++ 15116 +++$+++ 2011-03-22 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.300840500E09 +++$+++ I deleted the article as two hours passed and no further contributions were forthcoming (the user is also maintaining a userspace draft so there is no real loss of content). Reaper Eternal's advice is solid - per note 3 at [[WP:CSD]], it is best practice to wait at least 10 minutes prior to tagging an article as A1 or A3. -- +++$+++ :I deleted the article as two hours passed and no further contributions were forthcoming (the user is also maintaining a userspace draft so there is no real loss of content). Reaper Eternal's advice is solid - per note 3 at [[WP:CSD]], it is best practice to wait at least 10 minutes prior to tagging an article as A1 or A3. --[[User:Ponyo|<b><font color="Navy">''Jezebel's''</font></b><font color="Navy">Ponyo</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 17:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

539405 +++$+++ JSimin +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539405 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-21 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.219354140E09 +++$+++ \u0417\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0439! \u041d\u0435 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0431\u0438\u0440\u0430\u043c \u0437\u0430\u0449\u043e \u043d\u044f\u043a\u043e\u0438 \u0445\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u0438\u043c\u0430\u0442 \u0440\u0435\u0437\u0435\u0440\u0432\u0438 \u043a\u044a\u043c \u0433\u0435\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u0444\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0431\u043e\u0437\u043d\u0430\u0447\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0435 \u041f\u0438\u0440\u0438\u043d\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0438\u044f. \u0421\u043b\u0435\u0434 1913 \u0433. \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0438\u043c\u0430 \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0435\u0442\u043e \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435. \u0421\u0440\u0435\u0449\u0430\u043c \u0445\u043e\u0440\u0430, \u043a\u043e\u0438\u0442\u043e \u0441\u0438 \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u044f\u0442, \u0447\u0435 \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0435 \u0435\u0434\u0432\u0430 \u043b\u0438 \u043d\u0435 \u0432\u044a\u0437\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442 \u0437\u0430 \u043d\u044f\u043a\u0430\u043a\u0432\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u043a\u044a\u043c \u0411\u0413 \u0442\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044f, \u043d\u043e \u0432 \u043f\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0447\u0435\u0442\u043e \u0441\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0430\u0438 \u0442\u043e \u0435 \u0432 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0437\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e \u043f\u043e-\u043e\u0431\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e, \u043d\u0435\u043c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u043a\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u044f\u043d\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u0448\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044f, \u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e \u043f\u043e\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0432\u0430, \u0447\u0435 \u043d\u0435 \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e \u043c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0438\u0437\u043c\u044a\u0442 \u0438\u043c\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u0434 \u043c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e, \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043a\u043e \u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430\u043d\u043e, \u0447\u0435 \u0420\u041c \u043d\u0435 \u041c. \u0429\u0435 \u0442\u0438 \u0434\u0430\u043c \u0441\u0430\u043c\u043e [http:\/\/pt.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=L%C3%ADngua_maced%C3%B4nia&action=history \u0442\u043e\u0437\u0438]\u043f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440 \u0437\u0430\u0449\u043e \u0435 \u043d\u0443\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0447\u0435\u0440\u0442\u0430\u0435, \u0447\u0435 \u0411\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u043e \u0441\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u043c\u0438\u0440\u0430 \u0432 \u0433\u0435\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u0444\u0441\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0442 \u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0438\u044f. \u0420\u0430\u0437\u0431\u0438\u0440\u0430 \u0441\u0435, \u0438\u043c\u0430 \u0438 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0438\u043d\u0438. \u041f\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0440\u0430\u0432,-- +++$+++ Здравей! Не разбирам защо някои хора имат резерви към географското обозначаване Пириннска Македония. След 1913 г. това наименование има своето разпространение. Срещам хора, които си мислят, че това е едва ли не възожност за някакви претенции към БГ територия, но в повечето случаи то е в полза на едно по-обективно, немакедонистко представяне на нашата история, като показва, че не само македонизмът има права над македонското, или простичко казано, че РМ не М. Ще ти дам само [http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L%C3%ADngua_maced%C3%B4nia&action=history този]пример защо е нужно да се подчертае, че Банско се намира в географската област Македония. Разбира се, има и много други причини. Поздрав,--[[User:JSimin|JSimin]] ([[User talk:JSimin|talk]]) 14:29, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
539406 +++$+++ JSimin +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539405 +++$+++ 539405 +++$+++ 2008-08-21 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.219360200E09 +++$+++ \u0411\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u044f \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0437\u0430 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0431\u0438\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u0442\u043e! \u041d\u0430\u043f\u044a\u043b\u043d\u043e \u0441\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432, \u0447\u0435 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043d\u044f\u0442\u0438\u0435 \u0442\u043e\u0433\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u043d\u0435 \u0435 \u0438\u043c\u0430\u043b\u043e, \u043d\u043e \u0442\u043e \u0438 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0431\u0438\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u0442\u043e \u043f\u043e \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0435 \u043d\u0430 \u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u0430\u0442\u043e \u0433\u0435\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u0444\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u0435\u043a\u0442 \u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0434 \u0432\u044a\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441. \u041a\u0430\u0442\u043e \u0433\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043c \u0441\u044a\u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0431\u0435\u0441\u0435\u0434\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u041f\u0425 \u0438 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438\u044f\u0442\u0430 \u0432 \u041c\u041a \u0423, \u0442\u0435 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u0435 \u0434\u0440\u0430\u0437\u043d\u044f\u0442, \u0447\u0435 \u0438 \u041f\u0430\u0439\u0441\u0438\u0439 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435 e\u0432\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u043d\u043e \u0434\u0430 \u0435 \u0431\u0438\u043b \u043c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0435\u0446. \u041d\u0435 \u0435\u0442\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438, \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0431\u0438\u0440\u0430 \u0441\u0435, \u0430 \u0432 \u043f\u043e-\u0430\u0432\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0438\u044f, \u0440\u0435\u0433\u0438\u043e\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d \u0441\u043c\u0438\u0441\u044a\u043b. :) -- +++$+++ :Благодаря много за разбирането! Напълно си прав, че такова понятие тогава не е имало, но то и разбирането по това време на Македония като географски обект е под въпрос. Като гледам съответната беседа за ПХ и историята на статията в МК У, те много се дразнят, че и Пайсий може eвентуално да е бил македонец. Не етнически, разбира се, а в по-автентичния, регионален смисъл. :) --[[User:JSimin|JSimin]] ([[User talk:JSimin|talk]]) 16:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

15119 +++$+++ Jayron32 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15119 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-04 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.301946000E09 +++$+++ Please do not [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:78.127.32.61&curid=31373745&diff=422307714&oldid=422078552 restore deleted messages after they have been read].  This isn't particularly useful, and is likely to lead to conflict.  If a user has deleted a message, then they obviously have had the opportunity to read it, and it does not need to be maintained.  See [[WP:BLANKING]] and [[Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments]].  -- +++$+++ Please do not [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:78.127.32.61&curid=31373745&diff=422307714&oldid=422078552 restore deleted messages after they have been read].  This isn't particularly useful, and is likely to lead to conflict.  If a user has deleted a message, then they obviously have had the opportunity to read it, and it does not need to be maintained.  See [[WP:BLANKING]] and [[Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments]].  --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 12:40, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
15120 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15119 +++$+++ 15119 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.301946840E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for that.  +++$+++ : OK, thanks for that. [[User:Jan1nad|<span style="color:#009d43;font-weight:bold">''Jan<span style="font-size:80%;">1</span>naD''</span>]] <sup>(''[[User talk:Jan1nad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jan1nad|contrib]]'')</sup> 12:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

15121 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15121 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-17 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.308343260E09 +++$+++ Hi Jan1nad - I see you're making a few new Antarctica stubarticles (well done!)... just a heads-up that there will be a few new stub templates soon, to help reduce the huge numbers of stubs in the East and West Antarctica stub categories. Currently there are separate {{tl|RossDependency-geo-stub}} and {{tl|QueenMaudLand-geo-stub}} templates - a list of the others which will very likely soon be created can be seen at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting\/Proposals\/2011\/June#Antarctica]]. Cheers, and keep up the good work! :)  +++$+++ Hi Jan1nad - I see you're making a few new Antarctica stubarticles (well done!)... just a heads-up that there will be a few new stub templates soon, to help reduce the huge numbers of stubs in the East and West Antarctica stub categories. Currently there are separate {{tl|RossDependency-geo-stub}} and {{tl|QueenMaudLand-geo-stub}} templates - a list of the others which will very likely soon be created can be seen at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/2011/June#Antarctica]]. Cheers, and keep up the good work! :) [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 13:41, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
15122 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15121 +++$+++ 15121 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.308343500E09 +++$+++ Hi Grutness. I've tried assigning stubs where I can, but I don't (yet) have enough confidence that I will get them right. I hope you will understand if I use stubs that are more vague than they could be, I think this is better than being more specific, but with a higher probablility of error. And thanks for cleaning up after me.  +++$+++ : Hi Grutness. I've tried assigning stubs where I can, but I don't (yet) have enough confidence that I will get them right. I hope you will understand if I use stubs that are more vague than they could be, I think this is better than being more specific, but with a higher probablility of error. And thanks for cleaning up after me. [[User:Jan1nad|<span style="color:#009d43;font-weight:bold">''Jan<span style="font-size:80%;">1</span>naD''</span>]] <sup>(''[[User talk:Jan1nad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jan1nad|contrib]]'')</sup> 13:45, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
15123 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15121 +++$+++ 15122 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308388920E09 +++$+++ Anytime :) Sure, that makes sense. I'm just going by the longitude figures where they're given. It's just a case of trying to cut the 4000-odd unsorted stubs down a little.  +++$+++ ::Anytime :) Sure, that makes sense. I'm just going by the longitude figures where they're given. It's just a case of trying to cut the 4000-odd unsorted stubs down a little. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 02:22, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

46211 +++$+++ 118.92.132.230 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-23 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.272046740E09 +++$+++ Please remove the warning you left on my talk page as acceptance you made a mistake in placing it. When you tagged the [[2008 Otago NORML protests]] as a COI page, you did not explain why in your edit summary or on the talk page. I explained why I removed it and yet you reinstated it once again with no reason other than just re-explaining what the template means on the talk page. I have reviewed the page and in my opinion there is no clear bias in the writing, nor is there any indication that any of the main contributers are connected to the subject outside of [[WP:Systemic bias|systematic bias]]. On that basis, I am removing your template. Instead of repetitively re-adding it, either explain specifically what sentences need to be worked on\/changed\/sourced, or even better - do it yourself. [[Special:Contributions\/118.92.132.230|118.92.132.230]] ( +++$+++ Please remove the warning you left on my talk page as acceptance you made a mistake in placing it. When you tagged the [[2008 Otago NORML protests]] as a COI page, you did not explain why in your edit summary or on the talk page. I explained why I removed it and yet you reinstated it once again with no reason other than just re-explaining what the template means on the talk page. I have reviewed the page and in my opinion there is no clear bias in the writing, nor is there any indication that any of the main contributers are connected to the subject outside of [[WP:Systemic bias|systematic bias]]. On that basis, I am removing your template. Instead of repetitively re-adding it, either explain specifically what sentences need to be worked on/changed/sourced, or even better - do it yourself. [[Special:Contributions/118.92.132.230|118.92.132.230]] ([[User talk:118.92.132.230|talk]]) 11:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
46212 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46211 +++$+++ 46211 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.272050880E09 +++$+++ Nonsense, the primary contributor[http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&grouped=on&page=2008_Otago_NORML_protests] and article creator is Otepoti history, who other editors can see is a pro-Otago NORML\/cannabis SPA, and several of the references go to the Otagonorml's YouTube. The solution to the COI problem is for an editor without a history of supporting the group to do significant work on it, like a partial or full rewrite. You\/Otepoti history haven't commented on the merge, I understand you have no objection to incorporating the content into the [[Otago NORML]] article.  +++$+++ :Nonsense, the primary contributor[http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&grouped=on&page=2008_Otago_NORML_protests] and article creator is Otepoti history, who other editors can see is a pro-Otago NORML/cannabis SPA, and several of the references go to the Otagonorml's YouTube. The solution to the COI problem is for an editor without a history of supporting the group to do significant work on it, like a partial or full rewrite. You/Otepoti history haven't commented on the merge, I understand you have no objection to incorporating the content into the [[Otago NORML]] article. [[User:XLerate|XLerate]] ([[User talk:XLerate#top|talk]]) 12:28, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
46213 +++$+++ 118.92.129.27 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46211 +++$+++ 46212 +++$+++ 2010-04-25 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.272200280E09 +++$+++ The issue is not really on who the contributors are, for as I said before such an issue suffers from systematic bias. There is no way to force people who are not involved with the issue in any way to edit the article. The issue is whether the article actually is not neutral. Unless you can point out specific instances where the article discredits the groups opponents or casts a non-neutral light on the group itself, the tag does not really apply - and if you can, I assume it would be very easy for you to fix the issue. It would surely be better than absent mindedly tagging the article without explaining why or leaving any written justification, with no intent to come back and fix the page yourself. Maybe a compromise would be to change your COI tag into a clean up tag, seeing as you want a rewrite? It might be worth keeping in mind where you stand on this issue, and why you are motivated to leave the tag on the page. Do you disagree with the group? I will remind you that you appear to have a history of edit warring and if you continue to replace the tag without ending our discussion with an agreement, we might have to bring in a [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Edit warring|third party]]. You shouldn't assume anything, especially when the issue could be controversial. I have no strong opinion on the matter however, but I don't see any policy side reason to merge the article and I do see that the move could be counter productive as the event seems to have more than enough coverage and page content to sustain it's own article. [[Special:Contributions\/118.92.129.27|118.92.129.27]] ( +++$+++ ::The issue is not really on who the contributors are, for as I said before such an issue suffers from systematic bias. There is no way to force people who are not involved with the issue in any way to edit the article. The issue is whether the article actually is not neutral. Unless you can point out specific instances where the article discredits the groups opponents or casts a non-neutral light on the group itself, the tag does not really apply - and if you can, I assume it would be very easy for you to fix the issue. It would surely be better than absent mindedly tagging the article without explaining why or leaving any written justification, with no intent to come back and fix the page yourself. Maybe a compromise would be to change your COI tag into a clean up tag, seeing as you want a rewrite? It might be worth keeping in mind where you stand on this issue, and why you are motivated to leave the tag on the page. Do you disagree with the group? I will remind you that you appear to have a history of edit warring and if you continue to replace the tag without ending our discussion with an agreement, we might have to bring in a [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring|third party]]. You shouldn't assume anything, especially when the issue could be controversial. I have no strong opinion on the matter however, but I don't see any policy side reason to merge the article and I do see that the move could be counter productive as the event seems to have more than enough coverage and page content to sustain it's own article. [[Special:Contributions/118.92.129.27|118.92.129.27]] ([[User talk:118.92.129.27|talk]]) 05:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
46214 +++$+++ 118.92.129.27 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46211 +++$+++ 46213 +++$+++ 2010-04-25 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.272200460E09 +++$+++ While we're on the subject on the article history actually, you might want to have a look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=2008_Otago_NORML_protests&diff=348057757&oldid=348057240 this diff]. Seems to be in clear violation of [[WP:ROLLBACK]] if you ask me. [[Special:Contributions\/118.92.129.27|118.92.129.27]] ( +++$+++ :::While we're on the subject on the article history actually, you might want to have a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2008_Otago_NORML_protests&diff=348057757&oldid=348057240 this diff]. Seems to be in clear violation of [[WP:ROLLBACK]] if you ask me. [[Special:Contributions/118.92.129.27|118.92.129.27]] ([[User talk:118.92.129.27|talk]]) 06:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
46215 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46211 +++$+++ 46214 +++$+++ 2010-04-25 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.272213480E09 +++$+++ The major contributor appears to be connected with Otago NORML, so a COI tag is appropriate. The policy to merge the article is [[WP:NOTNEWS]] as I've said on the article talk page. The article still is an orphan, I thought rollback to restore the orphan tag was self-explanatory. If there was some confusion with unreferenced, [[WP:ORPHAN]] has the details.  +++$+++ ::::The major contributor appears to be connected with Otago NORML, so a COI tag is appropriate. The policy to merge the article is [[WP:NOTNEWS]] as I've said on the article talk page. The article still is an orphan, I thought rollback to restore the orphan tag was self-explanatory. If there was some confusion with unreferenced, [[WP:ORPHAN]] has the details. [[User:XLerate|XLerate]] ([[User talk:XLerate#top|talk]]) 09:38, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

15124 +++$+++ Felix Folio Secundus +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15124 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.310359800E09 +++$+++ The statement you have made into a quotation was based on this from the introduction (p. 5): \"The Action Plan will embed the short, medium and long-term actions necessary to create a strong, vibrant and successful centre that supports the local community and has the ability to fully exploit the economic potential of Metrolink.\" The report contains several descriptive sections, followed by a SWOC analysis and the plan itself.-- +++$+++ The statement you have made into a quotation was based on this from the introduction (p. 5): "The Action Plan will embed the short, medium and long-term actions necessary to create a strong, vibrant and successful centre that supports the local community and has the ability to fully exploit the economic potential of Metrolink." The report contains several descriptive sections, followed by a SWOC analysis and the plan itself.--[[User:Felix Folio Secundus|Felix Folio Secundus]] ([[User talk:Felix Folio Secundus|talk]]) 21:50, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
15125 +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ Jan1nad +++$+++ 15124 +++$+++ 15124 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310412240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for confirming my conjecture.  +++$+++ :Thanks for confirming my conjecture. [[User:Jan1nad|<span style="color:#009d43;font-weight:bold">''Jan<span style="font-size:80%;">1</span>naD''</span>]] <sup>(''[[User talk:Jan1nad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jan1nad|contrib]]'')</sup> 12:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

277271 +++$+++ Ryulong +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-28 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.164764760E09 +++$+++ Based on the fact that an open proxy essentially told me that Bobabobabo was fucking around at Bulbapedia (and that my personal account there got blocked in the process) I saw that a user there was claiming to be a user here who was proven to be Bobabobabo in a prior checkuser performed on an open proxy he\/she used to attack me at the Japanese Wikipedia. I put two and two together, and got a block in place.\u2014 +++$+++ Based on the fact that an open proxy essentially told me that Bobabobabo was fucking around at Bulbapedia (and that my personal account there got blocked in the process) I saw that a user there was claiming to be a user here who was proven to be Bobabobabo in a prior checkuser performed on an open proxy he/she used to attack me at the Japanese Wikipedia. I put two and two together, and got a block in place.—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Řÿūłóñģ</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="gold">竜龍</font>]]) 17:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
277272 +++$+++ Ryulong +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277271 +++$+++ 277271 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.164765060E09 +++$+++ See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Ryulong\/Unprotected&diff=90531725&oldid=90531298 this edit] for why I suspected and [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser\/Case\/Bobabobabo|the proof]]\u2014 +++$+++ :See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ryulong/Unprotected&diff=90531725&oldid=90531298 this edit] for why I suspected and [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bobabobabo|the proof]]—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Řÿūłóñģ</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="gold">竜龍</font>]]) 17:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

15128 +++$+++ Nadiatalent +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15128 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-11 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.302549300E09 +++$+++ Hi, I saw your changes to ''[[Prunus fasciculata]]'', it needed some work! Just a suggestion that you might want to consider using Wiktionary for links for Latin and English terms, for example, \"exceptionally\" comes up rather nicely with this coding: [[wikt:exceptionally|exceptionally]]. Carry on the good work!  +++$+++ Hi, I saw your changes to ''[[Prunus fasciculata]]'', it needed some work! Just a suggestion that you might want to consider using Wiktionary for links for Latin and English terms, for example, "exceptionally" comes up rather nicely with this coding: [[wikt:exceptionally|exceptionally]]. Carry on the good work! [[User:Nadiatalent|Nadiatalent]] ([[User talk:Nadiatalent|talk]]) 12:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
15129 +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15128 +++$+++ 15128 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.302552540E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I was unaware of how to so link. Is there any relationship between Wictionary and the various glossaries such as [[Glossary of botanical terms]]? A few weeks ago at WikiProject Plants, I had raised two issues: one about merging the various plant term glossaries, which was taken right up by members; and two about illustrations for plant terms, for which there was discussion regarding WP:OR and WP:Copyright, and some very nice images made by editors were pointed to. I plan to spend the next few months making anatomical illustrations for a comprehensive list of illustrations for the terms. Are my own drawings appropriate for Wictionary, too? Is there an \"artist task force\" at any WikiProject that might help with this? (Incidentally, I have never found a single edible desert almond that had not been pilfered by a ''[[Neotoma]] spp.'' or other vermin, and I speculate that ''P. fasciculata'' might make a good [[rootstock]] for commercial brands of almond grown in extreme dry climate agricultural operations. Almond seems to be a hot topic right now at Wikiproject Plants.)  +++$+++ :Thanks. I was unaware of how to so link. Is there any relationship between Wictionary and the various glossaries such as [[Glossary of botanical terms]]? A few weeks ago at WikiProject Plants, I had raised two issues: one about merging the various plant term glossaries, which was taken right up by members; and two about illustrations for plant terms, for which there was discussion regarding WP:OR and WP:Copyright, and some very nice images made by editors were pointed to. I plan to spend the next few months making anatomical illustrations for a comprehensive list of illustrations for the terms. Are my own drawings appropriate for Wictionary, too? Is there an "artist task force" at any WikiProject that might help with this? (Incidentally, I have never found a single edible desert almond that had not been pilfered by a ''[[Neotoma]] spp.'' or other vermin, and I speculate that ''P. fasciculata'' might make a good [[rootstock]] for commercial brands of almond grown in extreme dry climate agricultural operations. Almond seems to be a hot topic right now at Wikiproject Plants.) [[User:PPdd|PPdd]] ([[User talk:PPdd#top|talk]]) 13:09, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

539417 +++$+++ Victuallers +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-14 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.221419040E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Well done. Welcome to the elite club of serial DYK'ers. Thank you on behalf of the wiki and your fellows for the contributions. Cheers  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Well done. Welcome to the elite club of serial DYK'ers. Thank you on behalf of the wiki and your fellows for the contributions. Cheers [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 12:04, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
539418 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539417 +++$+++ 539417 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.221425040E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :) ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : Thanks! :) ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 13:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

15130 +++$+++ Nadiatalent +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-11 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.302579420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the tip that a useful discussion is going on at Almond, I hadn't had the heart to look.  +++$+++ Thanks for the tip that a useful discussion is going on at Almond, I hadn't had the heart to look. [[User:Nadiatalent|Nadiatalent]] ([[User talk:Nadiatalent|talk]]) 20:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
15131 +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15130 +++$+++ 15130 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.302582660E09 +++$+++ Do I graft? You have to ask my right foot small toe. When I started off grafting, I had never used a knife. So I got one of those Chevron Ortho \"fruit trees\" books for 50 cents at the local used book store, and a butcher knife from my mom's kitchen. I always go barefoot. Do I need to elaborate? Anyway, I still have the toe, and went on to spend an entire winter, all day, every day, until I had ten successful grafts of different varieties on each of about 60 bare root tree specials you used to be able to get for $1 each at the March bare root close outs at a Home Depot precursor hardware chain, after all the leaves had come in, and the ball of sawdust the bare root hairs had emerged into had started to rot. I got the varieties for free at a California Rare Fruit Growers scion exchange meeting. (And got a gillion bromeeliad pups for free, and lots of free orchid pups that died almost instantly. So there I was with my own 600 variety ''Rosaceae'' stone frut orchard ''planted on a rental property''. It would be a different variety of peach from May to the \"Halloween special\". I was going to leave to go exploring in the desert for 6 weeks, but dealt with the potential deer problem by putting a slice of a bar of deoderant soap at the base of each tree, getting some lion gland extract (do they still sell that stuff at nurseries?) and buying out all the throw away stereo speakers at good will and wiring a speaker to each tree, then hooking it all to a cheap radio tuned to a Christian broadcasting station that preached hellfire and brimstone rants 24\/7. It worked fine, and not a leaf got eaten by the deer. However, while I was gone, gophers chewed through the speaker wires, whence came the deer, and they did not even leave as much as a bite of cambium under the bark! Oh, well. Do I graft? Thanks for reminding me. Well, at least you didn't ask me about soil types, subsoil ecosystems, and fingernails, and remind me of that again! :)  +++$+++ :Do I graft? You have to ask my right foot small toe. When I started off grafting, I had never used a knife. So I got one of those Chevron Ortho "fruit trees" books for 50 cents at the local used book store, and a butcher knife from my mom's kitchen. I always go barefoot. Do I need to elaborate? Anyway, I still have the toe, and went on to spend an entire winter, all day, every day, until I had ten successful grafts of different varieties on each of about 60 bare root tree specials you used to be able to get for $1 each at the March bare root close outs at a Home Depot precursor hardware chain, after all the leaves had come in, and the ball of sawdust the bare root hairs had emerged into had started to rot. I got the varieties for free at a California Rare Fruit Growers scion exchange meeting. (And got a gillion bromeeliad pups for free, and lots of free orchid pups that died almost instantly. So there I was with my own 600 variety ''Rosaceae'' stone frut orchard ''planted on a rental property''. It would be a different variety of peach from May to the "Halloween special". I was going to leave to go exploring in the desert for 6 weeks, but dealt with the potential deer problem by putting a slice of a bar of deoderant soap at the base of each tree, getting some lion gland extract (do they still sell that stuff at nurseries?) and buying out all the throw away stereo speakers at good will and wiring a speaker to each tree, then hooking it all to a cheap radio tuned to a Christian broadcasting station that preached hellfire and brimstone rants 24/7. It worked fine, and not a leaf got eaten by the deer. However, while I was gone, gophers chewed through the speaker wires, whence came the deer, and they did not even leave as much as a bite of cambium under the bark! Oh, well. Do I graft? Thanks for reminding me. Well, at least you didn't ask me about soil types, subsoil ecosystems, and fingernails, and remind me of that again! :) [[User:PPdd|PPdd]] ([[User talk:PPdd#top|talk]]) 21:31, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

277276 +++$+++ Sudharsansn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-01 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.164989820E09 +++$+++ Hi Osgoodelawyer, I think it has been very unfair to block Elalan indefinitely when the case has still not been confirmed with any statistical evidence or just any information at all. An issue was raised, Essjay suspected something very inconclusively and now it is being declared to be a sockpuppet issue - a lot of coherence is lacking and it appears as if this whole thing has been foisted upon him. Elalan has contributed immensely to [[WP:NCSLC]] and has done a lot of good work. As per the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser\/Case\/Elalan Checkuser request] Essjay has clearly mentioned that it very inconclusive and that it could not be confirmed at all. Furthermore, it has been mentioned in his block log that he has done 'abusive work' which to me is a very derogatory statement to use against a fellow editor who has a lot of edits nd contributions in Eiki. I would be very glad if you could provide a clarification on his indefinite block, which sounds too harsh towards any editor with all the contributions by his side. Looking fwd to hear your opinion on this issue. Thanks  +++$+++ Hi Osgoodelawyer, I think it has been very unfair to block Elalan indefinitely when the case has still not been confirmed with any statistical evidence or just any information at all. An issue was raised, Essjay suspected something very inconclusively and now it is being declared to be a sockpuppet issue - a lot of coherence is lacking and it appears as if this whole thing has been foisted upon him. Elalan has contributed immensely to [[WP:NCSLC]] and has done a lot of good work. As per the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Elalan Checkuser request] Essjay has clearly mentioned that it very inconclusive and that it could not be confirmed at all. Furthermore, it has been mentioned in his block log that he has done 'abusive work' which to me is a very derogatory statement to use against a fellow editor who has a lot of edits nd contributions in Eiki. I would be very glad if you could provide a clarification on his indefinite block, which sounds too harsh towards any editor with all the contributions by his side. Looking fwd to hear your opinion on this issue. Thanks [[User:Sudharsansn|Sudharsansn]] ([[User talk:Sudharsansn|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Sudharsansn|contribs]]) 08:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
277277 +++$+++ Sudharsansn +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277276 +++$+++ 277276 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.165020540E09 +++$+++ I did not mean to offend you, just wanted an admin opinion on this. That's all!  +++$+++ :I did not mean to offend you, just wanted an admin opinion on this. That's all! [[User:Sudharsansn|Sudharsansn]] ([[User talk:Sudharsansn|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Sudharsansn|contribs]]) 16:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

15133 +++$+++ Arthur Rubin +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15133 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-31 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.306847460E09 +++$+++ If you would comment on the [[Quatloos.com]] thread at http:\/\/www.quatloos.com\/Q-Forum\/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7261 (with a previous closed thread at http:\/\/www.quatloos.com\/Q-Forum\/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7178 ), I would appreciate it.  I decline to do it myself, because the primary poster knows my real name, and has requested a meeting, which I would rather avoid.  Free registration is required to post at [[Quatloos.com]]. You may have some insight on the threads there, or be able to extract a real source related to the subject from the references in those threads.  \u2014  +++$+++ If you would comment on the [[Quatloos.com]] thread at http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7261 (with a previous closed thread at http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7178 ), I would appreciate it.  I decline to do it myself, because the primary poster knows my real name, and has requested a meeting, which I would rather avoid.  Free registration is required to post at [[Quatloos.com]]. You may have some insight on the threads there, or be able to extract a real source related to the subject from the references in those threads.  — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]]  [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 06:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
15134 +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15133 +++$+++ 15133 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.306879080E09 +++$+++ Stay safe.  +++$+++ :Stay safe. [[User:PPdd|PPdd]] ([[User talk:PPdd#top|talk]]) 14:58, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

15135 +++$+++ Ocaasi +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15135 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-04 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.307247480E09 +++$+++ Create a mini-project to bring the articles of [[Neda]], [[Mohamed Bouazizi]], [[Khaled Said]], and [[Hamza Ali Al-Khateeb]] up to GA\/FA status.  Possibly expand to include others whose deaths became symbols of war and peace (i.e. [[Pat Tillman]]).  Would you like to work on something like this?  +++$+++ Create a mini-project to bring the articles of [[Neda]], [[Mohamed Bouazizi]], [[Khaled Said]], and [[Hamza Ali Al-Khateeb]] up to GA/FA status.  Possibly expand to include others whose deaths became symbols of war and peace (i.e. [[Pat Tillman]]).  Would you like to work on something like this? [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]]<sup> [[User talk:Ocaasi|t ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ocaasi| c]]</sup> 21:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
15136 +++$+++ Ocaasi +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15135 +++$+++ 15135 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.307273820E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council\/Proposals\/HistoryBioLife]].  Might need a new name, but check it out...  +++$+++ * [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals/HistoryBioLife]].  Might need a new name, but check it out... [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]]<sup> [[User talk:Ocaasi|t ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ocaasi| c]]</sup> 04:37, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

15137 +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-05 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.307337240E09 +++$+++ Is there something urgent (or that I could do quickly) that you need help with, or is three weeks OK?   +++$+++ Is there something urgent (or that I could do quickly) that you need help with, or is three weeks OK?  [[User:PPdd|PPdd]] ([[User talk:PPdd#top|talk]]) 22:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
15138 +++$+++ Ocaasi +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15137 +++$+++ 15137 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.307339700E09 +++$+++ Three weeks is great.  Will you just add your support at the above link for now? Rain in desert, sounds great.  +++$+++ :Three weeks is great.  Will you just add your support at the above link for now? Rain in desert, sounds great. [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]]<sup> [[User talk:Ocaasi|t ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ocaasi| c]]</sup> 22:55, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

15140 +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15140 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-06 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.307394600E09 +++$+++ Check out this on the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Nothing&action=historysubmit&diff=423241360&oldid=423236607 \"True Color of Nothingness at Wikipedia\"]. They deleted the image of Death! Time for our cabal to take some action?  +++$+++ Check out this on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nothing&action=historysubmit&diff=423241360&oldid=423236607 "True Color of Nothingness at Wikipedia"]. They deleted the image of Death! Time for our cabal to take some action? [[User:PPdd|PPdd]] ([[User talk:PPdd#top|talk]]) 14:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
15141 +++$+++ Timl2k4 +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15140 +++$+++ 15140 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.307468760E09 +++$+++ The abyss is definitely not black! It's orange, my favorite color, I swear! Put in a swatch of orange and see what happens. :-D  +++$+++ : The abyss is definitely not black! It's orange, my favorite color, I swear! Put in a swatch of orange and see what happens. :-D [[User:Timl2k4|TimL]] ([[User talk:Timl2k4|talk]]) 10:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

15144 +++$+++ Timl2k4 +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15144 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-10 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.307714220E09 +++$+++ P.S. Black is something. You can't have black without white! It's hardly representative of the empty set.  +++$+++ P.S. Black is something. You can't have black without white! It's hardly representative of the empty set. [[User:Timl2k4|TimL]] ([[User talk:Timl2k4|talk]]) 06:57, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
15145 +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15144 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.309134900E09 +++$+++ Why can't I see your signature in the above comment, or that it, between the set of double apostrophes?  +++$+++ ::Why can't I see your signature in the above comment, or that it, between the set of double apostrophes? [[User:PPdd|PPdd]] ([[User talk:PPdd#top|talk]]) 17:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

402040 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Fropuff +++$+++ 402040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-02 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.175570400E09 +++$+++ Could you whip up some proper commutative diagrams to replace the three embarassing ASCII-art ones at [[subobject classifier]]? If you have the time and inclination, the article (and I!) would appreciate it. -- +++$+++ Could you whip up some proper commutative diagrams to replace the three embarassing ASCII-art ones at [[subobject classifier]]? If you have the time and inclination, the article (and I!) would appreciate it. --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 20:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
402041 +++$+++ Fropuff +++$+++ Fropuff +++$+++ 402040 +++$+++ 402040 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.175593560E09 +++$+++ Done. I took the liberty of correcting the first diagram. --  +++$+++ :Done. I took the liberty of correcting the first diagram. -- [[User:Fropuff|Fropuff]] 02:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
402042 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Fropuff +++$+++ 402040 +++$+++ 402041 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.175599980E09 +++$+++ Many thanks. And, wow, that was quick! -- +++$+++ :: Many thanks. And, wow, that was quick! --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 04:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

15147 +++$+++ Slakr +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310725200E09 +++$+++ Please do not restore [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost&diff=prev&oldid=439553905 threats of violence]. Thank you. -- +++$+++ Please do not restore [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost&diff=prev&oldid=439553905 threats of violence]. Thank you. --[[User:Slakr|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\&nbsp;[[User talk:Slakr|talk]]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 03:20, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
15148 +++$+++ Slakr +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15147 +++$+++ 15147 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.310726100E09 +++$+++ You do realize that you're actually furthering a multi-page [[WP:CANVASS|canvassing]] campaign? Please see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/64.134.239.108 the user's contributions]. Are you going to restore the removed posts on the other pages, as well? -- +++$+++ :You do realize that you're actually furthering a multi-page [[WP:CANVASS|canvassing]] campaign? Please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/64.134.239.108 the user's contributions]. Are you going to restore the removed posts on the other pages, as well? --[[User:Slakr|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\&nbsp;[[User talk:Slakr|talk]]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 03:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

15149 +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.310726580E09 +++$+++ Can you please help reword the poster's discussion section, so that the \"quotation\" of the threats against Wikipedians, off of Wikipedia, does not itself look like a threat, so the content can stay up for discussion? Thanks.  +++$+++ Can you please help reword the poster's discussion section, so that the "quotation" of the threats against Wikipedians, off of Wikipedia, does not itself look like a threat, so the content can stay up for discussion? Thanks. [[User:PPdd|PPdd]] ([[User talk:PPdd#top|talk]]) 03:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
15150 +++$+++ Slakr +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15149 +++$+++ 15149 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310726820E09 +++$+++ I'll try posting a thread on ANI, but again, please don't cross-post, and definitely don't restore the content on the signpost talk page, as that's not the appropriate venue. I'll update you in a moment. -- +++$+++ :I'll try posting a thread on ANI, but again, please don't cross-post, and definitely don't restore the content on the signpost talk page, as that's not the appropriate venue. I'll update you in a moment. --[[User:Slakr|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\&nbsp;[[User talk:Slakr|talk]]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 03:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
15151 +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15149 +++$+++ 15150 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.310727120E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Is there a place we can all discuss this without this crime ring reading the discuission of their threats against editors using WP:V and WP:RS, ''especially email threats using WP email addresses''?   +++$+++ ::Thanks. Is there a place we can all discuss this without this crime ring reading the discuission of their threats against editors using WP:V and WP:RS, ''especially email threats using WP email addresses''?  [[User:PPdd|PPdd]] ([[User talk:PPdd#top|talk]]) 03:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
15152 +++$+++ Slakr +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15149 +++$+++ 15151 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.310727540E09 +++$+++ Posted to ANI: [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Incidents#Possible_threats_of_violence]]. Feel free to comment there, but please [[WP:CIVIL|be calm and civil]], and avoid actually reposting threats&mdash;use links to them instead.  -- +++$+++ :::Posted to ANI: [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Possible_threats_of_violence]]. Feel free to comment there, but please [[WP:CIVIL|be calm and civil]], and avoid actually reposting threats&mdash;use links to them instead.  --[[User:Slakr|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\&nbsp;[[User talk:Slakr|talk]]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 03:59, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
15153 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ PPdd +++$+++ 15149 +++$+++ 15152 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.310733960E09 +++$+++ The ip is posing as Pearlasia Gamboa. On that basis all the edits of the ip have been suppressed, as have your restorations. Please do not continue to restore them.  +++$+++ ::::The ip is posing as Pearlasia Gamboa. On that basis all the edits of the ip have been suppressed, as have your restorations. Please do not continue to restore them. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 05:46, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

539439 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-21 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.224655440E09 +++$+++ Now, there's another thing that bugs me. Even if you gave the complete reference details for one source, another one was incomplete (and the order you used elsewhere reversed), while the other one (Thomas Tartler & Josef Trausch) simply lists no relevant details other than title and authors (what about year? publisher? page?!). I suspect the explanation here is that you simply copied the reference not from the original work, but from a secondary source - when I tried to fill in the publishing details, I came upon [http:\/\/www.promacedonia.org\/lm\/lm_1.htm this] (it cites the text and the book exactly as your addition does). I would say \"why not just cite the secondary source?\", but, really, to what measure is [http:\/\/www.promacedonia.org\/ this] a reliable source?  +++$+++ Now, there's another thing that bugs me. Even if you gave the complete reference details for one source, another one was incomplete (and the order you used elsewhere reversed), while the other one (Thomas Tartler & Josef Trausch) simply lists no relevant details other than title and authors (what about year? publisher? page?!). I suspect the explanation here is that you simply copied the reference not from the original work, but from a secondary source - when I tried to fill in the publishing details, I came upon [http://www.promacedonia.org/lm/lm_1.htm this] (it cites the text and the book exactly as your addition does). I would say "why not just cite the secondary source?", but, really, to what measure is [http://www.promacedonia.org/ this] a reliable source? [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn|talk]]) 23:04, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
539440 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539439 +++$+++ 539439 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.224787800E09 +++$+++ All in all, I don't want to seem like I'm \"on your case\". I have enjoyed your contributions whenever I got a chance to read them, and I'm particularly fond of the new trend whereby some of my favorite Bulgarian and Romanian editors discuss freely and amiably their common historical heritage and the traditional exaggerations on both sides. If we also aim towards adapting our writing styles to a consistent format, things can only be for the better. Cheers,  +++$+++ :All in all, I don't want to seem like I'm "on your case". I have enjoyed your contributions whenever I got a chance to read them, and I'm particularly fond of the new trend whereby some of my favorite Bulgarian and Romanian editors discuss freely and amiably their common historical heritage and the traditional exaggerations on both sides. If we also aim towards adapting our writing styles to a consistent format, things can only be for the better. Cheers, [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn|talk]]) 11:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

539441 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-23 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.224809640E09 +++$+++ But perhaps this is a good place and time to let you in on some \"secrets\" of my own. For starters, one of my maternal great-grandfathers was half-Bulgarian (born in Bulgaria, actually), and all my maternal family hails from an area where Bulgarians and Romanians lived side by side (incidentally, my Bulgarian great-grandfather was in denial, probably because he was an orphan raised by his relatives in Romania - did his best to forget Bulgarian and was quoted by my elders saying that, had he known what part of him was Bulgarian, he would have chopped it off). Amusingly, although they never spoke Bulgarian or anything, some of his descendants have inherited the \"inverted\" nods for yes and no, which they alternate with the \"normal\" ones - picture what comes out of this. On the other hand, my Bulgarian great-grandfather's son-in-law (my grandfather), from a Romanian family, always had a special love for Bulgaria, which he visited over and over again, where he made friends, and which he wanted to see cooperating with Romania in every way possible (even within a Balkan Federation). I have visited Bulgaria only once, a rather long time ago (though I have friends who go there almost every year); I was impressed with magnificent Plovdiv, but I also found that Bucharest does not compare with Sofia (our capital has grown ugly, dirty, flashy, exhausting and aggravating; yours I remember as pretty, clean, decent, refreshing and quiet).  +++$+++ But perhaps this is a good place and time to let you in on some "secrets" of my own. For starters, one of my maternal great-grandfathers was half-Bulgarian (born in Bulgaria, actually), and all my maternal family hails from an area where Bulgarians and Romanians lived side by side (incidentally, my Bulgarian great-grandfather was in denial, probably because he was an orphan raised by his relatives in Romania - did his best to forget Bulgarian and was quoted by my elders saying that, had he known what part of him was Bulgarian, he would have chopped it off). Amusingly, although they never spoke Bulgarian or anything, some of his descendants have inherited the "inverted" nods for yes and no, which they alternate with the "normal" ones - picture what comes out of this. On the other hand, my Bulgarian great-grandfather's son-in-law (my grandfather), from a Romanian family, always had a special love for Bulgaria, which he visited over and over again, where he made friends, and which he wanted to see cooperating with Romania in every way possible (even within a Balkan Federation). I have visited Bulgaria only once, a rather long time ago (though I have friends who go there almost every year); I was impressed with magnificent Plovdiv, but I also found that Bucharest does not compare with Sofia (our capital has grown ugly, dirty, flashy, exhausting and aggravating; yours I remember as pretty, clean, decent, refreshing and quiet). [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn|talk]]) 17:54, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
539442 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539441 +++$+++ 539441 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.225258260E09 +++$+++ I for one would enjoy an article about the \"inverted nods\". Would you also happen to envision what title it could have?  +++$+++ :I for one would enjoy an article about the "inverted nods". Would you also happen to envision what title it could have? [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn|talk]]) 22:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
539443 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539441 +++$+++ 539442 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.225276920E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.pasts.ceu.hu\/fileadmin\/template\/www.pasts.ceu.hu\/files\/nation_building_and_contested_identities.pdf Tolle, lege] (p. 121 ''ff.''). Fascinating; just a quote from Ion C. Br\u0103tianu to whet your appetite: \"We cannot exist without that small part of Bessarabia. We would be suffocated without that region. Through it, the gates of the world are opening up to us. Without Bessarabia we would be engulfed by Russia, Austria, Turkey, and Bulgaria. Dobrogea doesn\u2019t open up any exit for us, and in the lack of direct communication routes, we would be able to communicate with it only through swamps and marshes, or through a round journey that we would have to take through the mouth of the Danube. This we would not be able to accept under any circumstances.\" And: \"Adversaries of the annexation employed an impressive range of arguments against Dobrogea, portraying the population of the province as 'an assemblage of most turbulent elements, gathered there from all over the world,' and characterizing the province as 'a marshy country, in which yellow fever is endemic,' and the organization of which would prove 'the ruin of our finance.'\" --  +++$+++ ::[http://www.pasts.ceu.hu/fileadmin/template/www.pasts.ceu.hu/files/nation_building_and_contested_identities.pdf Tolle, lege] (p. 121 ''ff.''). Fascinating; just a quote from Ion C. Brătianu to whet your appetite: "We cannot exist without that small part of Bessarabia. We would be suffocated without that region. Through it, the gates of the world are opening up to us. Without Bessarabia we would be engulfed by Russia, Austria, Turkey, and Bulgaria. Dobrogea doesn’t open up any exit for us, and in the lack of direct communication routes, we would be able to communicate with it only through swamps and marshes, or through a round journey that we would have to take through the mouth of the Danube. This we would not be able to accept under any circumstances." And: "Adversaries of the annexation employed an impressive range of arguments against Dobrogea, portraying the population of the province as 'an assemblage of most turbulent elements, gathered there from all over the world,' and characterizing the province as 'a marshy country, in which yellow fever is endemic,' and the organization of which would prove 'the ruin of our finance.'" -- [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 03:42, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
539444 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539441 +++$+++ 539443 +++$+++ 2008-10-29 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.225306500E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/5\/56\/Mr_Burns.png Eeeexcellent].  +++$+++ :::[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/56/Mr_Burns.png Eeeexcellent]. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn|talk]]) 11:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

277299 +++$+++ Mikebe +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277299 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-08 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.165600380E09 +++$+++ I thought our short conversation last evening showed that cooperation might be possible. Was I wrong?  +++$+++ I thought our short conversation last evening showed that cooperation might be possible. Was I wrong? [[User:Mikebe|Mikebe]] 09:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
277300 +++$+++ JoshuaZ +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277299 +++$+++ 277299 +++$+++ 2006-12-09 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.165732800E09 +++$+++ Having looked over the discussions I am forced to conclude that a) the emphasis on American beer style guides is undue weight and thus not NPOV (it might be acceptable if weight and mention were also given to the European ones with clear indicators that the American ones are just American and have no consensus outside the US). b) I don't see anything \"anti-American\" about the other users edits. I strongly suggest you remain civil and cooperate with them in developoin NPOV versions of the articles in question.  +++$+++ : Having looked over the discussions I am forced to conclude that a) the emphasis on American beer style guides is undue weight and thus not NPOV (it might be acceptable if weight and mention were also given to the European ones with clear indicators that the American ones are just American and have no consensus outside the US). b) I don't see anything "anti-American" about the other users edits. I strongly suggest you remain civil and cooperate with them in developoin NPOV versions of the articles in question. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 22:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

277301 +++$+++ JoshuaZ +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-08 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.165627560E09 +++$+++ A checkuser was performed on the two users in question. They seem to be unrelated.  +++$+++ A checkuser was performed on the two users in question. They seem to be unrelated. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 17:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
277302 +++$+++ JoshuaZ +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277301 +++$+++ 277301 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.166173860E09 +++$+++ Not on Wiki. Checkuser requests are often done by email or various instant messengers clients between users who know each other. Sometimes that is more efficient than going through needless buaracracy. If you want a message confirming that the checkuser occured bug [[User talk:Jayjg]] who performed it.  +++$+++ : Not on Wiki. Checkuser requests are often done by email or various instant messengers clients between users who know each other. Sometimes that is more efficient than going through needless buaracracy. If you want a message confirming that the checkuser occured bug [[User talk:Jayjg]] who performed it. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 01:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

277305 +++$+++ JzG +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-21 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.166689980E09 +++$+++ It's up for deletion again [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion\/2006 December 20]], guess who nominated it.  Oh, you guessed. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]<\/b> <small>( +++$+++ It's up for deletion again [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2006 December 20]], guess who nominated it.  Oh, you guessed. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 00:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
277306 +++$+++ JChap2007 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277305 +++$+++ 277305 +++$+++ 2006-12-21 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.166690940E09 +++$+++ There's a question about where you got the image of the ''Enterprise''.  Maybe you could clarify?  +++$+++ :There's a question about where you got the image of the ''Enterprise''.  Maybe you could clarify? [[User:JChap2007|JChap2007]] 00:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

539450 +++$+++ Chief White Halfoat +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-28 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.225207260E09 +++$+++ I can't put the image of [[Hristo Batandzhiev]] in the infobox that I created in his article in the English Wiki. The image is avalable in the Bulgarian Wikipedia. Why is that? Do I need to upload the picture AGAIN in the English wiki? -- +++$+++ I can't put the image of [[Hristo Batandzhiev]] in the infobox that I created in his article in the English Wiki. The image is avalable in the Bulgarian Wikipedia. Why is that? Do I need to upload the picture AGAIN in the English wiki? --[[User:Chief White Halfoat|Chief White Halfoat]] ([[User talk:Chief White Halfoat|talk]]) 08:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
539451 +++$+++ Laveol +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539450 +++$+++ 539450 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.225246680E09 +++$+++ Well, upoading it to [commons.wikimedia.org Commons] would solve the problem, but I doubt you'd be able to squeeze it there. Yeah, to use it here it should be uploaded either to Commons or to the corresponding wiki. --''' +++$+++ :Well, upoading it to [commons.wikimedia.org Commons] would solve the problem, but I doubt you'd be able to squeeze it there. Yeah, to use it here it should be uploaded either to Commons or to the corresponding wiki. --'''[[User:Laveol|<font color="#007700">L<font color="#009900">a<font color="#00aa00">v<font color="#00cc00">e</font>o</font>l</font></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Laveol|T]]</sup>''' 19:18, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

15163 +++$+++ Killervogel5 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-14 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.210826700E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | That was an excellent solution to a problem that was confounding me for a while. I had a difficult time trying to figure out how on earth to get those in there and still look good, and you found quite an elegant way to do so. Thanks!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | That was an excellent solution to a problem that was confounding me for a while. I had a difficult time trying to figure out how on earth to get those in there and still look good, and you found quite an elegant way to do so. Thanks! [[User:Killervogel5|KV5]] ([[User talk:Killervogel5|talk]]) 21:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
15164 +++$+++ Killervogel5 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15163 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-15 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.210874880E09 +++$+++ Sure, I would love to help. I'll examine the code later today and see what I can do to lighten your load. Just drop a line and let me know what teams you'd like me to take a look at.  +++$+++ ::Sure, I would love to help. I'll examine the code later today and see what I can do to lighten your load. Just drop a line and let me know what teams you'd like me to take a look at. [[User:Killervogel5|KV5]] ([[User talk:Killervogel5|talk]]) 11:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

46218 +++$+++ Pdfpdf +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-17 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.274115840E09 +++$+++ Good work on the photos! Thanks.  +++$+++ Good work on the photos! Thanks. [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 10:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
46219 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46218 +++$+++ 46218 +++$+++ 2010-05-17 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.274116260E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:XLerate|XLerate]] ([[User talk:XLerate#top|talk]]) 10:11, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

539456 +++$+++ Pju0353 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539456 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-14 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.226683200E09 +++$+++ Hello, I want to know what the proper pronounciation,  Tundzha  is. Just [tunza] Right? or somthing... Because I translated the contents to Korean wikipedia and need to modify. maybe I have wonder what if the Bulgarian or Turkish pronounciation would be different. If you know, please let me know! :)  +++$+++ Hello, I want to know what the proper pronounciation,  Tundzha  is. Just [tunza] Right? or somthing... Because I translated the contents to Korean wikipedia and need to modify. maybe I have wonder what if the Bulgarian or Turkish pronounciation would be different. If you know, please let me know! :) [[User:Pju0353|Pju0353]] ([[User talk:Pju0353|talk]]) 09:20, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
539457 +++$+++ Pju0353 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539456 +++$+++ 539456 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.226871840E09 +++$+++ Thank for your kind answer for me ~! Hope someday I can get the similar question from you about Korea  +++$+++ : Thank for your kind answer for me ~! Hope someday I can get the similar question from you about Korea [[User:Pju0353|Pju0353]] ([[User talk:Pju0353|talk]]) 13:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

264672 +++$+++ Fabrictramp +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-29 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.248905400E09 +++$+++ Just a heads up on [[Nicole Levin]]. This had been tagged as a G11 speedy, which you deleted a couple of days ago. The article's creator has asked for a review of the deletion, and I'm just not seeing the ''unambiguous'' promotion here, so I've restored the article. No intention of wheel warring, just not seeing what you are seeing. I've advised the creator that notability needs to be dealt with or it may get deleted again, and I dropped a line to the speedy tagger letting him\/her know what I did, and recommending AfD if it still needs to go. If you think I'm out of line here, let me know and we'll talk. Cheers!-- +++$+++ Just a heads up on [[Nicole Levin]]. This had been tagged as a G11 speedy, which you deleted a couple of days ago. The article's creator has asked for a review of the deletion, and I'm just not seeing the ''unambiguous'' promotion here, so I've restored the article. No intention of wheel warring, just not seeing what you are seeing. I've advised the creator that notability needs to be dealt with or it may get deleted again, and I dropped a line to the speedy tagger letting him/her know what I did, and recommending AfD if it still needs to go. If you think I'm out of line here, let me know and we'll talk. Cheers!--[[User:Fabrictramp|<font color="#228b22" face="comic sans ms">Fabrictramp</font>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="Papyrus">talk to me</font>]] 15:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
264673 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264672 +++$+++ 264672 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.248906780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your message. I'll trust your judgement. Have fun.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your message. I'll trust your judgement. Have fun. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 15:33, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
264674 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264672 +++$+++ 264672 +++$+++ 2009-08-01 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.249152840E09 +++$+++ If you provide me with independent reliable sources backing up your assertions I will restate them immediately. As it stands, it appears that you are writing about your own work, and re [[WP:COI]], your claims cannot be assumed to have validity. The home-made DVD covers didn't help. Do you have [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]?   +++$+++ :If you provide me with independent reliable sources backing up your assertions I will restate them immediately. As it stands, it appears that you are writing about your own work, and re [[WP:COI]], your claims cannot be assumed to have validity. The home-made DVD covers didn't help. Do you have [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]?  [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

15170 +++$+++ No such user +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-04 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.252075860E09 +++$+++ Thank you for adding the IPA to the article. However, you wrote that Evia is \"pronounced \/\u02c8\u025bvi\u02d0\u0251\u02d0\/\", and that left me in the state of utter confusion \u2013 how come that those unstressed vowels are ''long''??? I can barely pronounce it written that way, and it sounds very un-English (sort of like Finnish). Did you perhaps mean \"\/\u02c8\u025bvi\u0251\/\"?  +++$+++ Thank you for adding the IPA to the article. However, you wrote that Evia is "pronounced /ˈɛviːɑː/", and that left me in the state of utter confusion – how come that those unstressed vowels are ''long''??? I can barely pronounce it written that way, and it sounds very un-English (sort of like Finnish). Did you perhaps mean "/ˈɛviɑ/"? [[User:No such user|No such user]] ([[User talk:No such user|talk]]) 07:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
15171 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15170 +++$+++ 15170 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.252321140E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the confusion, I was working directly off of [[Wikipedia:IPA for English]], where they make many length distinctions that don't exist in my dialect ([[General American|GA]]), so I likely hypercorrected.  Now that I look at it again, I think the best transcription would be \/\u02c8\u025bvi\u0251\u02d0\/, with the second syllable short.  The third syllable needs the length mark, since if it were shortened it'd also be reduced to a schwa (a legitimate-enough-sounding pronunciation, which likely often happens among those who actually talk about this place in English).  Perhaps the third syllable should have a secondary stress mark, though I'm reticent to use those except in compound words.  Thanks for pointing out my slipup!   +++$+++ :Sorry for the confusion, I was working directly off of [[Wikipedia:IPA for English]], where they make many length distinctions that don't exist in my dialect ([[General American|GA]]), so I likely hypercorrected.  Now that I look at it again, I think the best transcription would be /ˈɛviɑː/, with the second syllable short.  The third syllable needs the length mark, since if it were shortened it'd also be reduced to a schwa (a legitimate-enough-sounding pronunciation, which likely often happens among those who actually talk about this place in English).  Perhaps the third syllable should have a secondary stress mark, though I'm reticent to use those except in compound words.  Thanks for pointing out my slipup!  [[User:Xyzzyva|— ˈzɪzɨvə]] ([[User talk:Xyzzyva#top|talk]]) 03:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
15172 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15170 +++$+++ 15171 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.252327080E09 +++$+++ One question would be, Does \"Evvoia\" even have an English pronunciation? Maybe it does, I've just only seen \"Euboea\" except in Greek transliteration, but if it did, I'd expect the {{IPA|\/\u02c8\u025bvi\u0259\/}} that you suggest above.  +++$+++ ::One question would be, Does "Evvoia" even have an English pronunciation? Maybe it does, I've just only seen "Euboea" except in Greek transliteration, but if it did, I'd expect the {{IPA|/ˈɛviə/}} that you suggest above. [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 05:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
15173 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15170 +++$+++ 15172 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.252332300E09 +++$+++ I think I must have drawn {{IPA|\/\u02c8\u025bvi\u0251\u02d0\/}} from [http:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/Euboea M-W].  Please make any corrections you find appropriate, as I can't on my current computer (long story...)  +++$+++ :::I think I must have drawn {{IPA|/ˈɛviɑː/}} from [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Euboea M-W].  Please make any corrections you find appropriate, as I can't on my current computer (long story...) [[User:Xyzzyva|— ˈzɪzɨvə]] ([[User talk:Xyzzyva#top|talk]]) 07:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
15174 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15170 +++$+++ 15173 +++$+++ 2009-09-07 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.252341780E09 +++$+++ Okay, just looked it up, and it's 'ev.y\xe4.  +++$+++ ::::Okay, just looked it up, and it's 'ev.yä. [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 09:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

277318 +++$+++ MariusM +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-01 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.170394920E09 +++$+++ I saw you made this move and I want to explain why I disagree with it. In Soviet Union or in Russia a region named Transnistria never existed.  This appeared as a separate region only in WW2, when the teritorry between Dniester and South Bug was administered by Romania, following Axis invasion against Soviet Union, where Romania was allied with Germany. Previously, this teritorry was divided between Kherson region and Podolia region, but, AFAIK, it was never a separate entity on its own. After the war again it was not a separate teritorry on its own, it was divided between Soviet republics of Moldova (what is actually named Transnistria but is only a small part of WW2 region) and Ukraine (Odessa region and also parts of other regions).-- +++$+++ I saw you made this move and I want to explain why I disagree with it. In Soviet Union or in Russia a region named Transnistria never existed.  This appeared as a separate region only in WW2, when the teritorry between Dniester and South Bug was administered by Romania, following Axis invasion against Soviet Union, where Romania was allied with Germany. Previously, this teritorry was divided between Kherson region and Podolia region, but, AFAIK, it was never a separate entity on its own. After the war again it was not a separate teritorry on its own, it was divided between Soviet republics of Moldova (what is actually named Transnistria but is only a small part of WW2 region) and Ukraine (Odessa region and also parts of other regions).--[[User:MariusM|MariusM]] 21:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
277319 +++$+++ Illythr +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277318 +++$+++ 277318 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.170404940E09 +++$+++ Regarding Transnistria (region): The history is already covered in [[History of Transnistria]] the current situation is in [[Transnistria]] and its geography is not that expansive to go beyond a section in the main article and a list of places. I don't like the \"Soviet region\" either, because it never was one under that (Romanian!) name. And in that particular period of time it was a Romania-administered territory. -- +++$+++ : Regarding Transnistria (region): The history is already covered in [[History of Transnistria]] the current situation is in [[Transnistria]] and its geography is not that expansive to go beyond a section in the main article and a list of places. I don't like the "Soviet region" either, because it never was one under that (Romanian!) name. And in that particular period of time it was a Romania-administered territory. --[[User:Illythr|Illythr]] 00:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
277320 +++$+++ MariusM +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277318 +++$+++ 277319 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.170451080E09 +++$+++ Regarding the message in my talk page - the subject of article is notable enough for a Wikipedia article, there were several books published on this subject (one mentioned by Illythr on article's talk page). Also, there is a lot of confusions, sometimes deliberately spread, between actual Transnistria (which is a strip of land at Dniester bank) and WW2 Transnistria (which is a much bigger territory). Is incorrect to call it Soviet region, is also incorrect to call it Romanian region. Even if it was under Romanian administration, it was never declared part of Romania. Nazi Germany wanted to convince Romanian dictator Antonescu to anex Transnistria as a compensation for Romanian teritory in Northern Transylvania which was given to Hungary (same kind of compensation like Soviet did with Poland - they took some Polish teritorries and \"compensate\" Poland with some German teritorry after WW2), however Romanian authorities didn't made their minds what to do with this teritorry, they administrated it without a formal declaration of anexation and kept a border and custom on Dniester. As this region was created as a separate entity during WW2 and ceased to exist as a separate entity after WW2, I believe the title Transnistria (WW II) is the best.-- +++$+++ ::Regarding the message in my talk page - the subject of article is notable enough for a Wikipedia article, there were several books published on this subject (one mentioned by Illythr on article's talk page). Also, there is a lot of confusions, sometimes deliberately spread, between actual Transnistria (which is a strip of land at Dniester bank) and WW2 Transnistria (which is a much bigger territory). Is incorrect to call it Soviet region, is also incorrect to call it Romanian region. Even if it was under Romanian administration, it was never declared part of Romania. Nazi Germany wanted to convince Romanian dictator Antonescu to anex Transnistria as a compensation for Romanian teritory in Northern Transylvania which was given to Hungary (same kind of compensation like Soviet did with Poland - they took some Polish teritorries and "compensate" Poland with some German teritorry after WW2), however Romanian authorities didn't made their minds what to do with this teritorry, they administrated it without a formal declaration of anexation and kept a border and custom on Dniester. As this region was created as a separate entity during WW2 and ceased to exist as a separate entity after WW2, I believe the title Transnistria (WW II) is the best.--[[User:MariusM|MariusM]] 13:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
277321 +++$+++ MariusM +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277318 +++$+++ 277320 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.170453960E09 +++$+++ Check [[Administrative divisions of Ukraine]]. Former Transnistria (WW2) is now Moldovan Transnistria + parts of Odessa, Mikolayiv and Vinitsa regions of Ukraine.-- +++$+++ :::Check [[Administrative divisions of Ukraine]]. Former Transnistria (WW2) is now Moldovan Transnistria + parts of Odessa, Mikolayiv and Vinitsa regions of Ukraine.--[[User:MariusM|MariusM]] 14:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

46220 +++$+++ Schwede66 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-18 09:06:00 +++$+++ 1.274198760E09 +++$+++ Dear XLerate, I'd like to invite you to join me in an ambitious project - please refer to the [[User talk:Schwede66\/mayors|project talk page]] for further info. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ Dear XLerate, I'd like to invite you to join me in an ambitious project - please refer to the [[User talk:Schwede66/mayors|project talk page]] for further info. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Schwede66|Schwede]]</font><font color="#FF4500">[[User talk:Schwede66|66]]</font>''' 09:06, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
46221 +++$+++ Schwede66 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46220 +++$+++ 46220 +++$+++ 2010-05-25 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.274794320E09 +++$+++ Given that I haven't heard, I'm guessing that you are not keen. But that's ok - no worries. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :Given that I haven't heard, I'm guessing that you are not keen. But that's ok - no worries. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Schwede66|Schwede]]</font><font color="#FF4500">[[User talk:Schwede66|66]]</font>''' 06:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

539466 +++$+++ Laveol +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539466 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-16 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.226884980E09 +++$+++ Could you check on what I've exactly done on [[Vlado Chernozemski]] and [[Dimo Hadzhidimov]]. They were moved by a certain editor as you'll see and then I moved the first to a wrong location. Then I think I performed what is called a \"cut-and-paste\" move. This is not the proper result now, is it? --''' +++$+++ Could you check on what I've exactly done on [[Vlado Chernozemski]] and [[Dimo Hadzhidimov]]. They were moved by a certain editor as you'll see and then I moved the first to a wrong location. Then I think I performed what is called a "cut-and-paste" move. This is not the proper result now, is it? --'''[[User:Laveol|<font color="#007700">L<font color="#009900">a<font color="#00aa00">v<font color="#00cc00">e</font>o</font>l</font></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Laveol|T]]</sup>''' 17:23, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
539467 +++$+++ MacedonianBoy +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539466 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.226885160E09 +++$+++ Do whatever you want but keep in mind the neutrality and do not push your BG propaganda pls.--<font size=\"1\">''' +++$+++ ::Do whatever you want but keep in mind the neutrality and do not push your BG propaganda pls.--<font size="1">'''[[User:MacedonianBoy|<span style="color:#960018;background:#F0DC82;border-style: double">&nbsp;MacedonianBoy&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="1">[[User talk:MacedonianBoy|Oui?]]</font></sup>'''</font> 17:26, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
539468 +++$+++ Laveol +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539466 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.226885520E09 +++$+++ Stop it already - I see your ban is till 14th, but that doesn't mean you should start with ''your stuff'' again. --''' +++$+++ :::Stop it already - I see your ban is till 14th, but that doesn't mean you should start with ''your stuff'' again. --'''[[User:Laveol|<font color="#007700">L<font color="#009900">a<font color="#00aa00">v<font color="#00cc00">e</font>o</font>l</font></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Laveol|T]]</sup>''' 17:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
539469 +++$+++ MacedonianBoy +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539466 +++$+++ 539466 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.226885940E09 +++$+++ Today is 16 of November and I am not vandalizing just I am trying to stop your Bg nonsenses. If you do not like it- what can I do?  You cannot write the history, but you can create new false history as you are doing in BG and here. You are lying the people. this is encyclopaedia after all.--<font size=\"1\">''' +++$+++ :Today is 16 of November and I am not vandalizing just I am trying to stop your Bg nonsenses. If you do not like it- what can I do?  You cannot write the history, but you can create new false history as you are doing in BG and here. You are lying the people. this is encyclopaedia after all.--<font size="1">'''[[User:MacedonianBoy|<span style="color:#960018;background:#F0DC82;border-style: double">&nbsp;MacedonianBoy&nbsp;</span>]] <sup><font size="1">[[User talk:MacedonianBoy|Oui?]]</font></sup>'''</font> 17:39, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
539470 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539466 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.226886180E09 +++$+++ Well, the outcome looks fine to me, but it seems tome revision history was lost or at least it's not where it's supposed to be: that's no big deal really. The more important thing is that you undid this POV pusher's edits because they conflict with the arbitration and [[WP:MOSMAC]]. He should be promptly banned again for doing that, shouldn't he? I mean, it's ridiculous: Chernozemski wasn't even born in the region! :) ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ :::: Well, the outcome looks fine to me, but it seems tome revision history was lost or at least it's not where it's supposed to be: that's no big deal really. The more important thing is that you undid this POV pusher's edits because they conflict with the arbitration and [[WP:MOSMAC]]. He should be promptly banned again for doing that, shouldn't he? I mean, it's ridiculous: Chernozemski wasn't even born in the region! :) ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 17:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
539471 +++$+++ Laveol +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539466 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.226886660E09 +++$+++ Well, I have to say I hope this is the case. I imagine he hardly waited the previous ban to expire. --''' +++$+++ :::::Well, I have to say I hope this is the case. I imagine he hardly waited the previous ban to expire. --'''[[User:Laveol|<font color="#007700">L<font color="#009900">a<font color="#00aa00">v<font color="#00cc00">e</font>o</font>l</font></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Laveol|T]]</sup>''' 17:51, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

277323 +++$+++ Michaelbusch +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277323 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-12 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.171332240E09 +++$+++ The Ceres value was taken to four places.  We just don't know it that well.  The same applies to the other US values that were added, and to the metric values, in fact.  I removed the other US values, which were taken to three places.  The usage of US units as opposed to metric is another matter.  +++$+++ The Ceres value was taken to four places.  We just don't know it that well.  The same applies to the other US values that were added, and to the metric values, in fact.  I removed the other US values, which were taken to three places.  The usage of US units as opposed to metric is another matter. [[User:Michaelbusch|Michaelbusch]] 18:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
277324 +++$+++ Ckatz +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277323 +++$+++ 277323 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.171333200E09 +++$+++ I won't revert for now, but I don't think it was necessary to remove all of the US units, as you did at [[Ceres (dwarf planet)]]. My point (in agreeing with Michael's removal of the escape velocity converison) was that it doesn't make sense to have one conversion at Ceres, while the other \"major\" bodies (planets and dwarf planets) do not have the same conversion. If someone wants to do all of them at once, that would be a different matter. As it is right now, the removal of the US units from Ceres compunds the problem in that Ceres is now even more out of sync with the other infoboxes. --''' +++$+++ :I won't revert for now, but I don't think it was necessary to remove all of the US units, as you did at [[Ceres (dwarf planet)]]. My point (in agreeing with Michael's removal of the escape velocity converison) was that it doesn't make sense to have one conversion at Ceres, while the other "major" bodies (planets and dwarf planets) do not have the same conversion. If someone wants to do all of them at once, that would be a different matter. As it is right now, the removal of the US units from Ceres compunds the problem in that Ceres is now even more out of sync with the other infoboxes. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 18:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
277325 +++$+++ Ckatz +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277323 +++$+++ 277324 +++$+++ 2007-02-12 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.171333320E09 +++$+++ Case in point - the addition of that material by [[User:Toddles29]] recently. It was done across all of the bodies at the same time for consistency. --''' +++$+++ ::Case in point - the addition of that material by [[User:Toddles29]] recently. It was done across all of the bodies at the same time for consistency. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 18:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

15183 +++$+++ MrMacMan +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-19 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.266582120E09 +++$+++ Sorry for accidentally reverting your IPA for [[Dul\xe9 Hill]] it is much appreciated. I wish more articles had IPAs, i find them very useful!  +++$+++ Sorry for accidentally reverting your IPA for [[Dulé Hill]] it is much appreciated. I wish more articles had IPAs, i find them very useful! [[User:MrMacMan|<font color="darkorange" face="Times">'''MrMacMan'''</font>]][[User talk:MrMacMan|<sup><small><font color= "blue">''' Talk '''</font></small></sup>]] 04:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
15184 +++$+++ MrMacMan +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15183 +++$+++ 15183 +++$+++ 2010-02-19 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.266587220E09 +++$+++ I will make sure to tag pages with that in the future, thanks.  +++$+++ :I will make sure to tag pages with that in the future, thanks. [[User:MrMacMan|<font color="darkorange" face="Times">'''MrMacMan'''</font>]][[User talk:MrMacMan|<sup><small><font color= "blue">''' Talk '''</font></small></sup>]] 05:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

277329 +++$+++ Leebo86 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277329 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.172023740E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#HanzoHattori_.28personal_attacks.29|This discussion]] on [[WP:AN\/I]] appears to have been the catalyst for the block. I disagree with not telling him specifically what the violations were (especially since some of them in the discussion were a few weeks ago). There may be better recent examples, but I haven't looked through his contribs. <font color=\"#00688B\"><b> +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#HanzoHattori_.28personal_attacks.29|This discussion]] on [[WP:AN/I]] appears to have been the catalyst for the block. I disagree with not telling him specifically what the violations were (especially since some of them in the discussion were a few weeks ago). There may be better recent examples, but I haven't looked through his contribs. <font color="#00688B"><b>[[User:Leebo86|Leebo]]</b></font><small><sup><font color="B22222">[[User_Talk:Leebo86|86]]</font></sup></small> 18:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
277330 +++$+++ HighInBC +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277329 +++$+++ 277329 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.172024880E09 +++$+++ I have laid out the details on this users page, I agree it is important to explain your reasoning to the blocked user.  +++$+++ :I have laid out the details on this users page, I agree it is important to explain your reasoning to the blocked user. [[User:HighInBC|<small><sup>High</sup></small>InBC]]<small> <sup>(Need help? [[User_talk:HighInBC|Ask me]])</sup></small> 18:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

539474 +++$+++ Kensplanet +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539474 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-21 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.227297180E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray; height:5em;\"| I, '''[[User:Kensplanet|Kensplanet]]''' declare '''[[User:TodorBozhinov|TodorBozhinov]]''' the ''Hero of Bulgaria'' for his hard work in successfully elevating [[Vasil Levski]] to [[WP:GA|good article]] status. Vasil Levski is the national hero of [[Bulgaria]]. Keep it up !!! We are expecting more from you. Thanks,  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray; height:5em;"| I, '''[[User:Kensplanet|Kensplanet]]''' declare '''[[User:TodorBozhinov|TodorBozhinov]]''' the ''Hero of Bulgaria'' for his hard work in successfully elevating [[Vasil Levski]] to [[WP:GA|good article]] status. Vasil Levski is the national hero of [[Bulgaria]]. Keep it up !!! We are expecting more from you. Thanks, [[User:Kensplanet|<font color = "red">'''Kensplanet'''</font>]][[User talk:Kensplanet|<font color="black"><b><sup>Talk</sup></b></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Kensplanet|<font color="green"><b><sub>Contributions</sub></b></font>]] 11:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
539475 +++$+++ Laveol +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539474 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.227331560E09 +++$+++ Wow, congrats for that :)) You truly are a hero - this is definetly the top importance bg article. I think I've got to think of a barnstar for you as well ;) --''' +++$+++ ::Wow, congrats for that :)) You truly are a hero - this is definetly the top importance bg article. I think I've got to think of a barnstar for you as well ;) --'''[[User:Laveol|<font color="#007700">L<font color="#009900">a<font color="#00aa00">v<font color="#00cc00">e</font>o</font>l</font></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Laveol|T]]</sup>''' 21:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
539476 +++$+++ Kensplanet +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539474 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.227465900E09 +++$+++ A Well deserved GA.  +++$+++ :::A Well deserved GA. [[User:Kensplanet|<font color = "red">'''Kensplanet'''</font>]][[User talk:Kensplanet|<font color="black"><b><sup>Talk</sup></b></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Kensplanet|<font color="green"><b><sub>Contributions</sub></b></font>]] 10:45, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

277331 +++$+++  +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.172036100E09 +++$+++ I left a comment on AN\/I about it. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=109650994&oldid=109650517]. As I mentioned there, I completely forgot that you were involved in mentoring\/mediating with Hanzo, if I had remembered, I'd have definitely gotten with you first beforehand.  As for the lack of information to hanzo, I did mention it was personal attacks, and I was under the impression he was aware of the AN\/I thread.  +++$+++ I left a comment on AN/I about it. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=109650994&oldid=109650517]. As I mentioned there, I completely forgot that you were involved in mentoring/mediating with Hanzo, if I had remembered, I'd have definitely gotten with you first beforehand.  As for the lack of information to hanzo, I did mention it was personal attacks, and I was under the impression he was aware of the AN/I thread. [[User:Swatjester|<font color="red">&rArr;</font>]] [[User_talk:Swatjester|<font face="Euclid Fraktur"><font color="black">SWAT</font><font color="goldenrod">Jester</font></font>]] [[WP:CLIMBING|<small><sup>On Belay!</sup></small>]] 21:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
277332 +++$+++  +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277331 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.172036580E09 +++$+++ You seemed to be unofficially looking after him last time I ran across the two of you. Mentoring\/tutoring\/mediating, call it whatever you want.  +++$+++ ::You seemed to be unofficially looking after him last time I ran across the two of you. Mentoring/tutoring/mediating, call it whatever you want. [[User:Swatjester|<font color="red">&rArr;</font>]] [[User_talk:Swatjester|<font face="Euclid Fraktur"><font color="black">SWAT</font><font color="goldenrod">Jester</font></font>]] [[WP:CLIMBING|<small><sup>On Belay!</sup></small>]] 21:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

15189 +++$+++ Lfh +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15189 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-23 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.272038160E09 +++$+++ Thanks again.  If you're interested, there are at least a dozen more Puerto Rican placenames currently bearing a non-standard respelling.  +++$+++ Thanks again.  If you're interested, there are at least a dozen more Puerto Rican placenames currently bearing a non-standard respelling. [[User:Lfh|Lfh]] ([[User talk:Lfh|talk]]) 08:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
15190 +++$+++ Lfh +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15189 +++$+++ 15189 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.272838440E09 +++$+++ Hi, if you've got time, the [[Autonomous communities of Spain]] are mostly lacking pronunciations, as are the [[Regions of France]].  +++$+++ :Hi, if you've got time, the [[Autonomous communities of Spain]] are mostly lacking pronunciations, as are the [[Regions of France]]. [[User:Lfh|Lfh]] ([[User talk:Lfh|talk]]) 15:14, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

539479 +++$+++ PMK1 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539479 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-26 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.227729720E09 +++$+++ Hello MR Bozhinov, the bulgarian editors seem to be full of ethnographic materials from the early 20th century regarding Macedonia. I was wondering is you have any information on the village of \"Katafygi\/Katafigi\/Katafigion\" amongst the old turn of the century publications. If so, does the text mention the ethnicities present in the village at that time. The village was just excluded from V.Kanchovs Macedonia;Ethnography and Statistics report of 1900. As you can see [http:\/\/www.promacedonia.org\/vk\/map\/vkynchov_3b.jpg here]. If you know of sources, please do tell.  +++$+++ Hello MR Bozhinov, the bulgarian editors seem to be full of ethnographic materials from the early 20th century regarding Macedonia. I was wondering is you have any information on the village of "Katafygi/Katafigi/Katafigion" amongst the old turn of the century publications. If so, does the text mention the ethnicities present in the village at that time. The village was just excluded from V.Kanchovs Macedonia;Ethnography and Statistics report of 1900. As you can see [http://www.promacedonia.org/vk/map/vkynchov_3b.jpg here]. If you know of sources, please do tell. [[User:PMK1|PMK1]] ([[User talk:PMK1|talk]]) 12:02, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
539480 +++$+++ PMK1 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539479 +++$+++ 539479 +++$+++ 2008-11-26 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.227764160E09 +++$+++ Sure, if that is a possibility. Oh, i am not looking for a potential ethnic macedonian, my enquiry is regarding the village of Katafigi and a possible aromanian population there. As [http:\/\/www.promacedonia.org\/vk\/map\/vkynchov_3b.jpg you can see] the village is v. close to Mount Olympus and Vlaholivadon. He apparently spoke another language, this may in fact be true and turn out to be Aromanian. If you stumble across the source, feel free to forward the requested info.  +++$+++ :Sure, if that is a possibility. Oh, i am not looking for a potential ethnic macedonian, my enquiry is regarding the village of Katafigi and a possible aromanian population there. As [http://www.promacedonia.org/vk/map/vkynchov_3b.jpg you can see] the village is v. close to Mount Olympus and Vlaholivadon. He apparently spoke another language, this may in fact be true and turn out to be Aromanian. If you stumble across the source, feel free to forward the requested info. [[User:PMK1|PMK1]] ([[User talk:PMK1|talk]]) 21:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

264676 +++$+++ Scotness +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-01 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.249153560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Scotness|Scotness]] ([[User talk:Scotness|talk]]) 12:06, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
264677 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264676 +++$+++ 264676 +++$+++ 2009-08-01 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.249153920E09 +++$+++ Thank you for providing these links. I will reinstate your articles, although that will not protect it against someone else nominating them for deletion. [[WP:COI]] does not refer solely to financial motivations. However, you wouldn't be able to link to those images within the articles without permission from the copyright holders (although you can cite the articles).  +++$+++ :Thank you for providing these links. I will reinstate your articles, although that will not protect it against someone else nominating them for deletion. [[WP:COI]] does not refer solely to financial motivations. However, you wouldn't be able to link to those images within the articles without permission from the copyright holders (although you can cite the articles). [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:12, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
264678 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264676 +++$+++ 264677 +++$+++ 2009-08-01 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.249154160E09 +++$+++ I have restored the articles. The images failed to follow our policies by not providing adequate licensing information.  +++$+++ ::I have restored the articles. The images failed to follow our policies by not providing adequate licensing information. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 12:16, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

277339 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.174545000E09 +++$+++ Abu badali, I have confirmed that Chandra images, if not tagged on the site as including information from ground-based telescopes which are not under the control of NASA, are, in fact, completely public domain for all purposes, including commercial, so long as NASA-endorsement is not implied through their use (which is actually a completely different issue from use).  If you have listed Chandra images for deletion, could you let me know what they were, so I might look up and find out if they truly are fair use?  Thanks.  +++$+++ Abu badali, I have confirmed that Chandra images, if not tagged on the site as including information from ground-based telescopes which are not under the control of NASA, are, in fact, completely public domain for all purposes, including commercial, so long as NASA-endorsement is not implied through their use (which is actually a completely different issue from use).  If you have listed Chandra images for deletion, could you let me know what they were, so I might look up and find out if they truly are fair use?  Thanks. [[User:Lexicon|Lexicon]] <small>[[User talk:Lexicon|(talk)]]</small> 23:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
277340 +++$+++ Abu badali +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277339 +++$+++ 277339 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.174548780E09 +++$+++ Let me know whenever I can be of any help. Best regards, --'' +++$+++ :Let me know whenever I can be of any help. Best regards, --''[[User:Abu badali|Abu badali]] <sup>([[User_talk:Abu badali|talk]])</sup>'' 00:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

15196 +++$+++ Node ue +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-14 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.276568340E09 +++$+++ Certainly, there are lots of peculiarities in regional pronunciations so I understand the need\/desire to use broad transcription, but for me that does not mean representing a sound that, by the numbers, is only used by a relatively tiny minority of speakers of the language. In some regions of the world, \u2039h\u203a is preserved in certain positions, but at [[Havana]], it still says \"[la a\u02c8\u03b2ana]\". I agree that it is unrealistic to represent all the peculiarities of regional pronunciation, but the use of \u2039\u03b8\u203a to represent \u2039c\u203a and \u2039z\u203a appears glaring to me, an imposition of European pronunciations on a continent of people who would never say things like that. -- +++$+++ Certainly, there are lots of peculiarities in regional pronunciations so I understand the need/desire to use broad transcription, but for me that does not mean representing a sound that, by the numbers, is only used by a relatively tiny minority of speakers of the language. In some regions of the world, ‹h› is preserved in certain positions, but at [[Havana]], it still says "[la aˈβana]". I agree that it is unrealistic to represent all the peculiarities of regional pronunciation, but the use of ‹θ› to represent ‹c› and ‹z› appears glaring to me, an imposition of European pronunciations on a continent of people who would never say things like that. --[[User:Node ue|ಠ_ಠ node.ue ಠ_ಠ]] ([[User talk:Node ue|talk]]) 19:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
15197 +++$+++ Node ue +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15196 +++$+++ 15196 +++$+++ 2010-06-14 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.276575840E09 +++$+++ I don't believe the pronunciation of \u2039h\u203a in some rural areas is the reason for keeping the letter in the official orthography, since the conservative varieties are not prestige varieties. I think it's more of a historical spelling nowadays. WRT the pronunciation of r, I think that's a considerably different situation as a far greater percentage of (native) English speakers conserve it than do the voiceless dental fricative in Spanish (although I do think it's odd to see it in placenames where it's not locally pronounced). -- +++$+++ :I don't believe the pronunciation of ‹h› in some rural areas is the reason for keeping the letter in the official orthography, since the conservative varieties are not prestige varieties. I think it's more of a historical spelling nowadays. WRT the pronunciation of r, I think that's a considerably different situation as a far greater percentage of (native) English speakers conserve it than do the voiceless dental fricative in Spanish (although I do think it's odd to see it in placenames where it's not locally pronounced). --[[User:Node ue|ಠ_ಠ node.ue ಠ_ಠ]] ([[User talk:Node ue|talk]]) 21:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

15200 +++$+++ TaalVerbeteraar +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15200 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-08 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.278647280E09 +++$+++ Kindest regards,  +++$+++ Kindest regards, [[User:TaalVerbeteraar|TaalVerbeteraar]] ([[User talk:TaalVerbeteraar|talk]]) 20:48, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
15201 +++$+++ TaalVerbeteraar +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15200 +++$+++ 15200 +++$+++ 2010-07-10 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.278789000E09 +++$+++ In response to your writing on my talk page: I would guess that the contributor who wrote that \u0250 is an allophone for \/\u0251\/, meant that it is ''in Afrikaans''. I have certainly never heard of that use in Dutch. As for the use of \u0250 as an allophone of unstressed \/a\/ and as a marginal vowel: I will look into that, it might well be possible. I will raise the issue on the talk page when I find out. -  +++$+++ : In response to your writing on my talk page: I would guess that the contributor who wrote that ɐ is an allophone for /ɑ/, meant that it is ''in Afrikaans''. I have certainly never heard of that use in Dutch. As for the use of ɐ as an allophone of unstressed /a/ and as a marginal vowel: I will look into that, it might well be possible. I will raise the issue on the talk page when I find out. - [[User:TaalVerbeteraar|TaalVerbeteraar]] ([[User talk:TaalVerbeteraar|talk]]) 12:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

277346 +++$+++ I'm so special +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-31 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.175385300E09 +++$+++ Are you sure bold is innapropriate there? It could be said that wikipedia is pushing spin if we do not stress the fact that the things stated are in the opinion of the US government. What do you think? -- +++$+++ Are you sure bold is innapropriate there? It could be said that wikipedia is pushing spin if we do not stress the fact that the things stated are in the opinion of the US government. What do you think? --[[User:I'm so special|I&#39;m so special]] 16:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
277347 +++$+++ I'm so special +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277346 +++$+++ 277346 +++$+++ 2007-03-31 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.175399040E09 +++$+++ agreed, but in the wider picture there actually is suspiscion on the view of the US government don't you agree? -- +++$+++ :agreed, but in the wider picture there actually is suspiscion on the view of the US government don't you agree? --[[User:I'm so special|I&#39;m so special]] 20:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
277348 +++$+++ I'm so special +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277346 +++$+++ 277346 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.175446320E09 +++$+++ Agreed again, I'll shut up now L.O.L -- +++$+++ :Agreed again, I'll shut up now L.O.L --[[User:I'm so special|I&#39;m so special]] 09:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

539491 +++$+++ PMK1 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-02 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.230904020E09 +++$+++ I am interested in putting the [[Slavic dialects of Greece|South Slavic]] names for [[Xanthi]], [[Myki, Greece|Myki]], [[Kotyli]], [[Alexandroupoli]], [[Amaxades]] after all the people there are [[Pomaks]] who speak the Pomak language. I mean we all know that they speak bulgarian and you know that in West Macedonia, the Macedonian language is spoken. By the same logic we could add SE-Slavic to all the cities i just mentioned, apparently bulgarian isnt spoken there.  +++$+++ I am interested in putting the [[Slavic dialects of Greece|South Slavic]] names for [[Xanthi]], [[Myki, Greece|Myki]], [[Kotyli]], [[Alexandroupoli]], [[Amaxades]] after all the people there are [[Pomaks]] who speak the Pomak language. I mean we all know that they speak bulgarian and you know that in West Macedonia, the Macedonian language is spoken. By the same logic we could add SE-Slavic to all the cities i just mentioned, apparently bulgarian isnt spoken there. [[User:PMK1|PMK1]] ([[User talk:PMK1|talk]]) 05:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
539492 +++$+++ PMK1 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539491 +++$+++ 539491 +++$+++ 2009-01-03 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.230973320E09 +++$+++ I find that very strange coming from you. But it is a linguistic fact that the \"pomak language\" is merely a dialect of Bulgarian, and should be treated as such. In the same way the \"slavic dialects of greece\" are dialects of the Macedonian language. These are both linguistic facts. One does not need to speak the \"codified\" language to have the language spoken in that area. Do you really think that in most areas of ROM the codified language is spoken? What is wrong with \"south slavic\" and \"local slavic\" , they are not languages and rather a POV push by certain users to dissaciate the respective languages from bulgarian in the east and macedonian in the west. Who says '''I''' have nothing to do with western thrace, by the same logic '''you''' have nothing to do with west greek macedonia. Funnily enough the name was agreed to by both ROM users and Greek users, you objection is interesting to me. Are the dialects spoken in west greek macedonia, not dialects of the macedonian language?  +++$+++ :I find that very strange coming from you. But it is a linguistic fact that the "pomak language" is merely a dialect of Bulgarian, and should be treated as such. In the same way the "slavic dialects of greece" are dialects of the Macedonian language. These are both linguistic facts. One does not need to speak the "codified" language to have the language spoken in that area. Do you really think that in most areas of ROM the codified language is spoken? What is wrong with "south slavic" and "local slavic" , they are not languages and rather a POV push by certain users to dissaciate the respective languages from bulgarian in the east and macedonian in the west. Who says '''I''' have nothing to do with western thrace, by the same logic '''you''' have nothing to do with west greek macedonia. Funnily enough the name was agreed to by both ROM users and Greek users, you objection is interesting to me. Are the dialects spoken in west greek macedonia, not dialects of the macedonian language? [[User:PMK1|PMK1]] ([[User talk:PMK1|talk]]) 01:02, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
539493 +++$+++ PMK1 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539491 +++$+++ 539492 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.231668000E09 +++$+++ You really think that i am so irrendentist, dont you. Where the language spoken by the locals is clearly macedonian i really cannot see why you must add bulgarian names. I am not talking about places in serres, drama, kavala prefectures, but in florina, kastoria, pella and imathia prefectures where the language is clearly macedonian. It seems very ridiculous to outside users, ''(this is why it got the lamest cultural\/ethnic disputes)'', that we cant even agree on what langauge it is. Linguistically it is Macedonian, in the past it was known as Bulgarian. I am well aware of that. Today it is Macedonian, we agreed on Macedonian Slavic, as a compromise. It would be like adding Macedonian toponyms alongside bulgarian ones, for blagoevgrad and petric and sandanski. Something which shouldnt be done because in those towns the people are in fact Bulgarians and not ethnic Macedonians. It will be interesting to see if my people really exist or we are just some or your lot. Remember it is Bulgarian [[Ano Vrontou|here]] but not [[Meliti|here]]. I will revert you one more time, then i will leave the ball in your hands.  +++$+++ ::You really think that i am so irrendentist, dont you. Where the language spoken by the locals is clearly macedonian i really cannot see why you must add bulgarian names. I am not talking about places in serres, drama, kavala prefectures, but in florina, kastoria, pella and imathia prefectures where the language is clearly macedonian. It seems very ridiculous to outside users, ''(this is why it got the lamest cultural/ethnic disputes)'', that we cant even agree on what langauge it is. Linguistically it is Macedonian, in the past it was known as Bulgarian. I am well aware of that. Today it is Macedonian, we agreed on Macedonian Slavic, as a compromise. It would be like adding Macedonian toponyms alongside bulgarian ones, for blagoevgrad and petric and sandanski. Something which shouldnt be done because in those towns the people are in fact Bulgarians and not ethnic Macedonians. It will be interesting to see if my people really exist or we are just some or your lot. Remember it is Bulgarian [[Ano Vrontou|here]] but not [[Meliti|here]]. I will revert you one more time, then i will leave the ball in your hands. [[User:PMK1|PMK1]] ([[User talk:PMK1|talk]]) 02:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
539494 +++$+++ PMK1 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539491 +++$+++ 539493 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.231707060E09 +++$+++ But linguists agree, that in the west and the central areas it is Macedonian. In the east it is Bulgarian. This is the language that i am talking about. This is a linguistic fact.  +++$+++ :::But linguists agree, that in the west and the central areas it is Macedonian. In the east it is Bulgarian. This is the language that i am talking about. This is a linguistic fact. [[User:PMK1|PMK1]] ([[User talk:PMK1|talk]]) 12:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

15204 +++$+++ Jrod2 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15204 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-13 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.281685860E09 +++$+++ I'm tellin ya, Bro, the Spanish way to pronounce his last name is not Bar'''den'''. Spanish is very clear on the rules to pronounce any word (including last names) that ends with an *M*. It's EMMM not EN. Its a foreign name not object for English translation,  +++$+++ I'm tellin ya, Bro, the Spanish way to pronounce his last name is not Bar'''den'''. Spanish is very clear on the rules to pronounce any word (including last names) that ends with an *M*. It's EMMM not EN. Its a foreign name not object for English translation, [[User:Jrod2|Jrod2]] ([[User talk:Jrod2|talk]]) 00:51, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
15205 +++$+++ Jrod2 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15204 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-14 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.281780660E09 +++$+++ Please dont ignore what I said. We need to settle your claim that the subject's name is pronounced with N at the end not M. The rationale is that his name is in Latin\/Spanish.  +++$+++ ::Please dont ignore what I said. We need to settle your claim that the subject's name is pronounced with N at the end not M. The rationale is that his name is in Latin/Spanish. [[User:Jrod2|Jrod2]] ([[User talk:Jrod2|talk]]) 03:11, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
15206 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15204 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-14 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.281830940E09 +++$+++ Like I said in the commented-out comment in the article, Spanish doesn't contrast the nasal consonants {{IPA|\/m, n, \u0272\/}} in word-final position.  Normal Spanish orthography reflects this, and only uses \u2039n\u203a.  This being a surname, it happens to use an \u2039m\u203a, but the {{IPA|\/m\/}} sound still isn't possible here.  Listen to [http:\/\/www.forvo.com\/word\/javier_bardem#es these two Spanish-speakers here.]  Anyway, it's a minor point, and I don't feel like continuing to monitor it.   +++$+++ :::Like I said in the commented-out comment in the article, Spanish doesn't contrast the nasal consonants {{IPA|/m, n, ɲ/}} in word-final position.  Normal Spanish orthography reflects this, and only uses ‹n›.  This being a surname, it happens to use an ‹m›, but the {{IPA|/m/}} sound still isn't possible here.  Listen to [http://www.forvo.com/word/javier_bardem#es these two Spanish-speakers here.]  Anyway, it's a minor point, and I don't feel like continuing to monitor it.  [[User:Xyzzyva|— ˈzɪzɨvə]] ([[User talk:Xyzzyva#top|talk]]) 17:09, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
15207 +++$+++ Jrod2 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15204 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-14 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.281835200E09 +++$+++ I have no idea where u are from bro, but i asked 3 Mexicans and 2 Ricans to pronounce that last name and no of them pronounce it with an '''n''' at the end. This is something only Spaniards do. So Ima gonna remove the whole thing out 'cause this isn't 'bout how proper Spanish (frm Spain) pronunciation should be or ought to be....if ya wanna, add the latin {{IPA|\/m, n, \u0272\/}}.  +++$+++ :::::I have no idea where u are from bro, but i asked 3 Mexicans and 2 Ricans to pronounce that last name and no of them pronounce it with an '''n''' at the end. This is something only Spaniards do. So Ima gonna remove the whole thing out 'cause this isn't 'bout how proper Spanish (frm Spain) pronunciation should be or ought to be....if ya wanna, add the latin {{IPA|/m, n, ɲ/}}. [[User:Jrod2|Jrod2]] ([[User talk:Jrod2|talk]]) 18:20, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
15208 +++$+++ Jrod2 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15204 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-14 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.281839280E09 +++$+++ Great!! Now you add links that create more confusion...did you even read (and understand) the discussion at that forum on WordReference.com?? Its telling ya exactly what I've been talking to ya 'bout.  +++$+++ ::::::Great!! Now you add links that create more confusion...did you even read (and understand) the discussion at that forum on WordReference.com?? Its telling ya exactly what I've been talking to ya 'bout. [[User:Jrod2|Jrod2]] ([[User talk:Jrod2|talk]]) 19:28, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

277350 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-01 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.175472300E09 +++$+++ Why just that one? What about all the others shown at [[World's busiest airport#See also]]? Cheers.  +++$+++ Why just that one? What about all the others shown at [[World's busiest airport#See also]]? Cheers. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 17:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
277351 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277350 +++$+++ 277350 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.175473320E09 +++$+++ Sorry, not being clear. I was just wondering why move only that one from \"Canada's busiest airport\" to \"List of Canada's busiest airports\" but not the others. [[World's busiest airports by international passenger traffic]], [[World's busiest airports by passenger traffic]], [[World's busiest airports by traffic movements]] and [[World's busiest airports by cargo traffic]] are all lists as well. I'm not bothered where they are but I was just curious. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Sorry, not being clear. I was just wondering why move only that one from "Canada's busiest airport" to "List of Canada's busiest airports" but not the others. [[World's busiest airports by international passenger traffic]], [[World's busiest airports by passenger traffic]], [[World's busiest airports by traffic movements]] and [[World's busiest airports by cargo traffic]] are all lists as well. I'm not bothered where they are but I was just curious. Cheers. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 17:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
277352 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277350 +++$+++ 277351 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.175473380E09 +++$+++ OK. No problems.  +++$+++ ::OK. No problems. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 17:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

570513 +++$+++ Kralizec! +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570513 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-25 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.222331280E09 +++$+++ Hello.  The tmbox changes you made to {{tl|uw-block1}} look good ... with one exception.  Instead of being centered, the template should be left-justified to match the rest of the warnings\/messages\/block notices in the harmonized uw-scheme.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Hello.  The tmbox changes you made to {{tl|uw-block1}} look good ... with one exception.  Instead of being centered, the template should be left-justified to match the rest of the warnings/messages/block notices in the harmonized uw-scheme.  Thanks, [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 01:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
570514 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570513 +++$+++ 570513 +++$+++ 2008-09-25 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.222333500E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 02:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
570515 +++$+++ Kralizec! +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570513 +++$+++ 570514 +++$+++ 2008-09-25 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.222336080E09 +++$+++ Interesting.  I wonder how the centering will look with the numbered layout as specified at [[WP:UW]] and [[WP:UTM]].  -- +++$+++ ::Interesting.  I wonder how the centering will look with the numbered layout as specified at [[WP:UW]] and [[WP:UTM]].  --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 02:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
570516 +++$+++ Kralizec! +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570513 +++$+++ 570515 +++$+++ 2008-09-25 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.222338960E09 +++$+++ Also, I just noticed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3A81.96.173.249&diff=240821394&oldid=240820872] that the admin .sig is no longer included inside the block template message box.  Is this an oversight or another \"feature\"?  -- +++$+++ :::Also, I just noticed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A81.96.173.249&diff=240821394&oldid=240820872] that the admin .sig is no longer included inside the block template message box.  Is this an oversight or another "feature"?  --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 03:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
570517 +++$+++ MBisanz +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570513 +++$+++ 570516 +++$+++ 2008-09-25 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.222339260E09 +++$+++ Hmm, that is awkward, I do like the signature in the box. With my own tmbox implementations,I've always been able to move it inside, see [[User:MBisanz\/MESSAGES]]. ''' +++$+++ ::::Hmm, that is awkward, I do like the signature in the box. With my own tmbox implementations,I've always been able to move it inside, see [[User:MBisanz/MESSAGES]]. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 03:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
570518 +++$+++ Kralizec! +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570513 +++$+++ 570517 +++$+++ 2008-09-25 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.222370520E09 +++$+++ I guess I would use the phrase \"looks terrible\" but \"awkward\" works just as well.  While I would really like to support the {{tl|tmbox}}, forcing newer (working) templates like the uw-series into the change without first addressing all the issues gives me great pause.  It would be a different story if someone had said back in January 2007 \"hey, make sure these new uw templates follow [[Template:Tmbox\/styles]]\" but 627 days later?  -- +++$+++ :::::I guess I would use the phrase "looks terrible" but "awkward" works just as well.  While I would really like to support the {{tl|tmbox}}, forcing newer (working) templates like the uw-series into the change without first addressing all the issues gives me great pause.  It would be a different story if someone had said back in January 2007 "hey, make sure these new uw templates follow [[Template:Tmbox/styles]]" but 627 days later?  --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 12:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
570519 +++$+++ MBisanz +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570513 +++$+++ 570518 +++$+++ 2008-09-25 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.222370760E09 +++$+++ He he, I bet Tmbox didn't even exist in 2007.  I did fix the sig part of the Uw-block1 template.  ''' +++$+++ ::::::He he, I bet Tmbox didn't even exist in 2007.  I did fix the sig part of the Uw-block1 template.  '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 12:26, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

277353 +++$+++ Jeff3000 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-01 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.175475660E09 +++$+++ There are many country articles that have a mismash of different styles; the manual of style on Wikipedia, for the most part, is a guideline, and so each country could have different styles with the preferences of the editors who edit on those articles. (For example look at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countries]] where it states ''\"This structure is advisory only, and should not be enforced against the wishes of those actually working on the article in question.\"''  So even the COA gets broad consensus for\/against among many countries, each country could be somewhat different.  The important thing is that [[Canada]] is a featured article, and it should portray a higher level of adherence.  Regards, --  +++$+++ There are many country articles that have a mismash of different styles; the manual of style on Wikipedia, for the most part, is a guideline, and so each country could have different styles with the preferences of the editors who edit on those articles. (For example look at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countries]] where it states ''"This structure is advisory only, and should not be enforced against the wishes of those actually working on the article in question."''  So even the COA gets broad consensus for/against among many countries, each country could be somewhat different.  The important thing is that [[Canada]] is a featured article, and it should portray a higher level of adherence.  Regards, -- [[User:Jeff3000|Jeff3000]] 18:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
277354 +++$+++ Jeff3000 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277353 +++$+++ 277353 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.175476680E09 +++$+++ I quoted the structure, but the same spirit could be applied to any style within that page.  And in my mind too many levels of rules is not constructive.  The infoboxes are standardizied, but there is a great amount of flexibility in it's use, and the fields that are used in each page.  In the context of the COA, we had a discussion, the consensus was not to include it within the Canadian page. Regars, --  +++$+++ :I quoted the structure, but the same spirit could be applied to any style within that page.  And in my mind too many levels of rules is not constructive.  The infoboxes are standardizied, but there is a great amount of flexibility in it's use, and the fields that are used in each page.  In the context of the COA, we had a discussion, the consensus was not to include it within the Canadian page. Regars, -- [[User:Jeff3000|Jeff3000]] 18:18, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

15210 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-07 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.283865480E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for cleaning up so much of the IPA again. I added your new template extension to the list at [[Template:Usage of IPA templates]]. \u2014  +++$+++ Hey, thanks for cleaning up so much of the IPA again. I added your new template extension to the list at [[Template:Usage of IPA templates]]. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 06:18, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
15211 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15210 +++$+++ 15210 +++$+++ 2010-09-15 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.284607800E09 +++$+++ Also added {{tl|IPA-sa}} to [[Template:Usage of IPA templates]] (moved it up to the section on functioning templates) and to [[Template:IPAhelp]]. \u2014  +++$+++ :Also added {{tl|IPA-sa}} to [[Template:Usage of IPA templates]] (moved it up to the section on functioning templates) and to [[Template:IPAhelp]]. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 20:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
15212 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15210 +++$+++ 15211 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.285056000E09 +++$+++ Added another 35 words to [[Category_talk:Wikipedia_articles_with_nonstandard_pronunciation]], in case you can figure any of them out. They aren't tagged, but are mostly short so the IPA should be easy to find. \u2014  +++$+++ ::Added another 35 words to [[Category_talk:Wikipedia_articles_with_nonstandard_pronunciation]], in case you can figure any of them out. They aren't tagged, but are mostly short so the IPA should be easy to find. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 01:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

539499 +++$+++ Tikiwont +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-29 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.233250200E09 +++$+++ The page [[User:TodorBozhinov\/Bulgarians in Turkey]] was discussed at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion\/User:TodorBozhinov\/Bulgarians in Turkey]]. While there was no consensus to delete at this time, please review [[Wikipedia:Userpage#Copies_of_other_pages]]. If you think you can improve it, please do so and bring the revised version to [[WP:DRV|deletion review]]. Otherwise you can also tag it at any point with {{tl|db-user}}. -- +++$+++ The page [[User:TodorBozhinov/Bulgarians in Turkey]] was discussed at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TodorBozhinov/Bulgarians in Turkey]]. While there was no consensus to delete at this time, please review [[Wikipedia:Userpage#Copies_of_other_pages]]. If you think you can improve it, please do so and bring the revised version to [[WP:DRV|deletion review]]. Otherwise you can also tag it at any point with {{tl|db-user}}. --[[User:Tikiwont|Tikiwont]] ([[User talk:Tikiwont|talk]]) 09:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
539500 +++$+++ Tikiwont +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539499 +++$+++ 539499 +++$+++ 2009-01-29 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.233262500E09 +++$+++ Well, I haven't looked much into the AfD itself, but next time in such a situation you may want to raise the issue of closure with the closing administrator and ask for [[WP:Userfication|userfication]] by them. At this point you still have the copy, can improve it if possible, and then proceed as above. -- +++$+++ :Well, I haven't looked much into the AfD itself, but next time in such a situation you may want to raise the issue of closure with the closing administrator and ask for [[WP:Userfication|userfication]] by them. At this point you still have the copy, can improve it if possible, and then proceed as above. --[[User:Tikiwont|Tikiwont]] ([[User talk:Tikiwont|talk]]) 12:55, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

277358 +++$+++ Kanuni Sultan Suleyman +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-03 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.175654400E09 +++$+++ Sock version of tha that article is not good. Realize it. Tha page is now in accordance with tha mahority of tha peoble. -- +++$+++ Sock version of tha that article is not good. Realize it. Tha page is now in accordance with tha mahority of tha peoble. --[[User:Kanuni Sultan Suleyman|Kanuni Sultan Suleyman]] 19:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
277359 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277358 +++$+++ 277358 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.175655300E09 +++$+++ No problem. He's a sockpuppet of the banned user [[User:Bonaparte|Bonaparte]]. I can smell him from a mile away. ;-) <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :No problem. He's a sockpuppet of the banned user [[User:Bonaparte|Bonaparte]]. I can smell him from a mile away. ;-) <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 19:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

15216 +++$+++ Scheridon +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15216 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-17 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.290029820E09 +++$+++ But thank you for your good-faith edits and the advice about the IPA stress mark.  +++$+++ But thank you for your good-faith edits and the advice about the IPA stress mark. [[User:Scheridon|Scheridon]] ([[User talk:Scheridon|talk]]) 13:37, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
15217 +++$+++ Scheridon +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15216 +++$+++ 15216 +++$+++ 2010-11-17 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.290049200E09 +++$+++ Hi! I heard the samples at Forvo as two syllables. To my ear, Chu\xed has 2 syllables, but I'm a native speaker, you know...  +++$+++ :Hi! I heard the samples at Forvo as two syllables. To my ear, Chuí has 2 syllables, but I'm a native speaker, you know... [[User:Scheridon|Scheridon]] ([[User talk:Scheridon|talk]]) 19:00, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

277361 +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.175813280E09 +++$+++ I arent sure if proper procedures are being followed by the insertion of that template, but I happen to [[User:Huaiwei\/Instantnoodles#Known_lackeys_and_symphathisers|suspect the same thing]].-- +++$+++ I arent sure if proper procedures are being followed by the insertion of that template, but I happen to [[User:Huaiwei/Instantnoodles#Known_lackeys_and_symphathisers|suspect the same thing]].--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 15:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
277362 +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277361 +++$+++ 277361 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.175815200E09 +++$+++ You are most welcome to launch a full investigation on this if you wish, for I, too, would love to know who he is. That dosent mean suspicions over User:Privacy are invalidated and worthy for deletion.-- +++$+++ :You are most welcome to launch a full investigation on this if you wish, for I, too, would love to know who he is. That dosent mean suspicions over User:Privacy are invalidated and worthy for deletion.--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 16:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
277363 +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277361 +++$+++ 277362 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.175815740E09 +++$+++ An \"established user\" who appears at strategic moments (such as now, when the other \"established user\" is being slapped with a one-month block\") and wikiwars on the other user's behalf dosent make him less of a suspect case. While I agree it is strange that we are having a suspect sockpuppet accusing another of the same thing, outright removing his nomination, as well as page protecting that page prevents others from making the same nomination, or helping to contribute information in support of it.-- +++$+++ ::An "established user" who appears at strategic moments (such as now, when the other "established user" is being slapped with a one-month block") and wikiwars on the other user's behalf dosent make him less of a suspect case. While I agree it is strange that we are having a suspect sockpuppet accusing another of the same thing, outright removing his nomination, as well as page protecting that page prevents others from making the same nomination, or helping to contribute information in support of it.--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 16:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
277364 +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277361 +++$+++ 277363 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.175899680E09 +++$+++ I am considering all possible courses of action, including the one you just cited. Looking at the fallout occuring immediately after [[User:Instantnood]]'s return, I suppose the urgency has just upped a mighty notch.-- +++$+++ :::I am considering all possible courses of action, including the one you just cited. Looking at the fallout occuring immediately after [[User:Instantnood]]'s return, I suppose the urgency has just upped a mighty notch.--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 15:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

15218 +++$+++ Ezhiki +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks for adding the IPA pronunciation to the pages about places in Russia. I just thought you might want to know that instead of doing [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Magadan&curid=58098&diff=405068702&oldid=403744241 this] you could utilize the {{tl|lang-rus}} template, which [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Magadan&diff=405725854&oldid=405068702 produces] a somewhat cleaner output and is a bit easier to use. Cheers,\u2014 +++$+++ Thanks for adding the IPA pronunciation to the pages about places in Russia. I just thought you might want to know that instead of doing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Magadan&curid=58098&diff=405068702&oldid=403744241 this] you could utilize the {{tl|lang-rus}} template, which [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Magadan&diff=405725854&oldid=405068702 produces] a somewhat cleaner output and is a bit easier to use. Cheers,—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); January&nbsp;3, 2011; 18:29 (UTC)
15219 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15218 +++$+++ 15218 +++$+++ 2011-01-16 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.295165820E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Chevrolet_Aveo&action=historysubmit&diff=408040658&oldid=408004085 converting the pronunciation] of \"Aveo\" from phonetic to IPA. Would you mind doing the same at [[Toyota Aurion]]? I have no idea how to formulate IPA pronunciations, so your help would be much appreciated (see [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=7wJusft4FSU this video] for spoken pronunciation). <small> +++$+++ :Hi, thanks for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chevrolet_Aveo&action=historysubmit&diff=408040658&oldid=408004085 converting the pronunciation] of "Aveo" from phonetic to IPA. Would you mind doing the same at [[Toyota Aurion]]? I have no idea how to formulate IPA pronunciations, so your help would be much appreciated (see [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wJusft4FSU this video] for spoken pronunciation). <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 00:17, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
15220 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15218 +++$+++ 15219 +++$+++ 2011-01-16 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.295248380E09 +++$+++ Thank you. <small> +++$+++ ::Thank you. <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 23:13, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

15221 +++$+++ Jaume87 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-21 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.306024680E09 +++$+++ I've already corrected some; like [[Pl\xednio Salgado]], [[Maria Beth\xe2nia]], [[Rond\xf4nia]], [[Morro da Babil\xf4nia]], [[Portal da Transpar\xeancia]], [[Bolsa Fam\xedlia]], [[Pal\xe1cio da Luz]], [[Inconfid\xeancia Mineira]], [[Lampi\xe3o]], etc. Thanks.  +++$+++ I've already corrected some; like [[Plínio Salgado]], [[Maria Bethânia]], [[Rondônia]], [[Morro da Babilônia]], [[Portal da Transparência]], [[Bolsa Família]], [[Palácio da Luz]], [[Inconfidência Mineira]], [[Lampião]], etc. Thanks. [[User:Jaume87|Jɑυмe]] <small>([[User talk:Jaume87|xarrades]])</small> 17:38, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
15222 +++$+++ Jaume87 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15221 +++$+++ 15221 +++$+++ 2011-05-22 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.306133400E09 +++$+++ You are right, I think we should discuss it on [[WP:IPA for Portuguese]]. The weird thing is most phonological studies of Portuguese don't mention anything about these hiatus\/diphthongs in EP\/BP, however dictionaries seem to make a difference.  +++$+++ :You are right, I think we should discuss it on [[WP:IPA for Portuguese]]. The weird thing is most phonological studies of Portuguese don't mention anything about these hiatus/diphthongs in EP/BP, however dictionaries seem to make a difference. [[User:Jaume87|Jɑυмe]] <small>([[User talk:Jaume87|xarrades]])</small> 23:50, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

15223 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-05 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.307274360E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, a thread you were involved in has been reopened at [[Wikipedia talk:IPA for Malay#Allophones of [e], [i], [o], and [u] in Indonesian]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ Just to let you know, a thread you were involved in has been reopened at [[Wikipedia talk:IPA for Malay#Allophones of [e], [i], [o], and [u] in Indonesian]]. Thanks. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 04:46, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
15224 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Xyzzyva +++$+++ 15223 +++$+++ 15223 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.307274600E09 +++$+++ Okay, that link won't work. Anyways, it's at [[Wikipedia talk:IPA for Malay]] in that section.  +++$+++ :Okay, that link won't work. Anyways, it's at [[Wikipedia talk:IPA for Malay]] in that section. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 04:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

277368 +++$+++ Tulkolahten +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.176345840E09 +++$+++ I removed back changes by Matthead. B\xfcrger-Brauerei is a common phrase meaning Burgess Brewery. Franz Andreas Paupie is a nonsense and it doesn't exist, his name was Franti\u0161ek Ond\u0159ej Poup\u011b, just try google. I am fed up with Matthead's attempts to germanize what does not belong to Germany. If I find japanesse source about Canada then I am not going to change article about Canada to reach japanesse spelling and use hiragana all over the wikipedia. ''' +++$+++ I removed back changes by Matthead. Bürger-Brauerei is a common phrase meaning Burgess Brewery. Franz Andreas Paupie is a nonsense and it doesn't exist, his name was František Ondřej Poupě, just try google. I am fed up with Matthead's attempts to germanize what does not belong to Germany. If I find japanesse source about Canada then I am not going to change article about Canada to reach japanesse spelling and use hiragana all over the wikipedia. '''[[User:Tulkolahten|<span style="background:#CCFFFF;color:#FF0033">≈Tulkolahten≈</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tulkolahten|≈talk≈]]</sup>''' 19:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
277369 +++$+++ Tulkolahten +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277368 +++$+++ 277368 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.176345900E09 +++$+++ Also I tried to talk about changes, but Matthead refused with personal attack and I am not going to discuss with him about anything anymore, I tried that, see this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3APilsener&diff=116055184&oldid=115976177]. ''' +++$+++ :Also I tried to talk about changes, but Matthead refused with personal attack and I am not going to discuss with him about anything anymore, I tried that, see this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APilsener&diff=116055184&oldid=115976177]. '''[[User:Tulkolahten|<span style="background:#CCFFFF;color:#FF0033">≈Tulkolahten≈</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tulkolahten|≈talk≈]]</sup>''' 19:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
277370 +++$+++ Tulkolahten +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277368 +++$+++ 277369 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.176346380E09 +++$+++ No, german sources are welcomed. But Matthead's edits try to make Pilsener a German, but Pilsen was and is part of Bohemia. He went so far that he added a german category (Category:German loanwords) and removed czech category (Category:Czech cuisine). He refused talking about that and he insists on his disruptive edits. Btw. he is currently blocked for disruptive behavior on [[History_of_philosophy_in_Poland]]. ''' +++$+++ ::No, german sources are welcomed. But Matthead's edits try to make Pilsener a German, but Pilsen was and is part of Bohemia. He went so far that he added a german category (Category:German loanwords) and removed czech category (Category:Czech cuisine). He refused talking about that and he insists on his disruptive edits. Btw. he is currently blocked for disruptive behavior on [[History_of_philosophy_in_Poland]]. '''[[User:Tulkolahten|<span style="background:#CCFFFF;color:#FF0033">≈Tulkolahten≈</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tulkolahten|≈talk≈]]</sup>''' 19:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
277371 +++$+++ Tulkolahten +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277368 +++$+++ 277368 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.176347040E09 +++$+++ I don't insist on czech names, what I removed were german names. ''' +++$+++ :I don't insist on czech names, what I removed were german names. '''[[User:Tulkolahten|<span style="background:#CCFFFF;color:#FF0033">≈Tulkolahten≈</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tulkolahten|≈talk≈]]</sup>''' 20:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
277372 +++$+++ Tulkolahten +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277368 +++$+++ 277371 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.176349200E09 +++$+++ a.s. means that company emitted stocks and is owned by a group of owners each having amount of stocks of the company. I am not sure if it has translation into english. ''' +++$+++ ::a.s. means that company emitted stocks and is owned by a group of owners each having amount of stocks of the company. I am not sure if it has translation into english. '''[[User:Tulkolahten|<span style="background:#CCFFFF;color:#FF0033">≈Tulkolahten≈</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tulkolahten|≈talk≈]]</sup>''' 20:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

15225 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15225 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-09 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.284071340E09 +++$+++ Hello Andrzejbanas. Just wanted to drop you a note saying that it looks like the Criterion Collection has some very interesting releases coming up. None more so than the \"America Lost and Found: The BBS Story\" set. Every film in the set is fascinating in its own way and it will be nice to have them all at one time. Of course, I don't know your taste in films so these might not interest you. One more thing that I wanted to clue you in on, in case you weren't aware of it, is the fact that once or twice a year all CC and Eclipse series DVD's go on sale at Barnes & Noble for 50% off. If you have their member card you save a further 10%. That is an incredible savings and I try to have the patience to wait for it. Last time they had the sale I added the [[Sacha Guitry]] set to my library and - though I had never heard of him before - I have found his films to be extraordinary. I hope that you are well and, as ever, thank you for all of the work that you do here at wikipedia.  +++$+++ Hello Andrzejbanas. Just wanted to drop you a note saying that it looks like the Criterion Collection has some very interesting releases coming up. None more so than the "America Lost and Found: The BBS Story" set. Every film in the set is fascinating in its own way and it will be nice to have them all at one time. Of course, I don't know your taste in films so these might not interest you. One more thing that I wanted to clue you in on, in case you weren't aware of it, is the fact that once or twice a year all CC and Eclipse series DVD's go on sale at Barnes & Noble for 50% off. If you have their member card you save a further 10%. That is an incredible savings and I try to have the patience to wait for it. Last time they had the sale I added the [[Sacha Guitry]] set to my library and - though I had never heard of him before - I have found his films to be extraordinary. I hope that you are well and, as ever, thank you for all of the work that you do here at wikipedia. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 15:29, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
15226 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15225 +++$+++ 15225 +++$+++ 2010-09-09 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.284072840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply. Rats to the fact that they don't have the same sale in Canada. If you are willing to take a risk you can get a good price on used dvd's on Amazon sometimes. When I watched ''The Story of a Cheat'' I practically had to pick my jaw up off of the floor. It breaks all of the rules of film storytelling and does so five years before Orson Welles broke the same rules with ''Citizen Kane''. Well worth a look if you ever get the chance. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the reply. Rats to the fact that they don't have the same sale in Canada. If you are willing to take a risk you can get a good price on used dvd's on Amazon sometimes. When I watched ''The Story of a Cheat'' I practically had to pick my jaw up off of the floor. It breaks all of the rules of film storytelling and does so five years before Orson Welles broke the same rules with ''Citizen Kane''. Well worth a look if you ever get the chance. Cheers. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 15:54, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

539515 +++$+++ Turco85 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-21 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.235252640E09 +++$+++ Hi! Thanks for your judgment. I understand your thoughts and take them on board. But I\u2019m sure you see that I have only placed this category into articles which states a Turkish community. I do not think it is necessary to have a certain percentage point as even 1% is quite a high percentage for certain cities. Also please not that the category is not about \u2018major\u2019 populations, just Turkish communities\u2026   +++$+++ Hi! Thanks for your judgment. I understand your thoughts and take them on board. But I’m sure you see that I have only placed this category into articles which states a Turkish community. I do not think it is necessary to have a certain percentage point as even 1% is quite a high percentage for certain cities. Also please not that the category is not about ‘major’ populations, just Turkish communities…  [[User:Turco85|Turco85]] ([[User talk:Turco85|talk]]) 13:44, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
539516 +++$+++ Turco85 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539515 +++$+++ 539515 +++$+++ 2009-02-21 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.235253960E09 +++$+++ ''Places with a Turkish community outside Turkey'' sounds fine to me... however I do remember naming disputes on this category in previous months. Nevertheless, I would be satisfied with such a change. My only objection would be to having a certain percentage for the category for the reasons I set forth before\u2026  +++$+++ : ''Places with a Turkish community outside Turkey'' sounds fine to me... however I do remember naming disputes on this category in previous months. Nevertheless, I would be satisfied with such a change. My only objection would be to having a certain percentage for the category for the reasons I set forth before… [[User:Turco85|Turco85]] ([[User talk:Turco85|talk]]) 14:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

15228 +++$+++ Gman124 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-10 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.284154200E09 +++$+++ I went the follwoing [http:\/\/www.horrormovies.org\/database\/year\/2009\/ horrormovies.org] for 2009 and they have like 917 movies listed there. so is it a reliable source or are they also including everything like thrillers in there too? <font face=\"Comic Sans MS\"> +++$+++ I went the follwoing [http://www.horrormovies.org/database/year/2009/ horrormovies.org] for 2009 and they have like 917 movies listed there. so is it a reliable source or are they also including everything like thrillers in there too? <font face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Gman124|<span style="color:darkblue">Gman</span><span style="color:darkgreen">124</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Gman124|<span style="color:darkblue"> talk</span>]]</sup></font> 14:30, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
15229 +++$+++ Gman124 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15228 +++$+++ 15228 +++$+++ 2010-09-10 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.284154320E09 +++$+++ Oh wait the title of the tab says Horror and Sci-Fi Movies Database. <font face=\"Comic Sans MS\"> +++$+++ :Oh wait the title of the tab says Horror and Sci-Fi Movies Database. <font face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Gman124|<span style="color:darkblue">Gman</span><span style="color:darkgreen">124</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Gman124|<span style="color:darkblue"> talk</span>]]</sup></font> 14:32, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
15230 +++$+++ Gman124 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15228 +++$+++ 15229 +++$+++ 2010-09-10 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.284157500E09 +++$+++ So, I revert everything I added by looking at horrormovies.org? <font face=\"Comic Sans MS\"> +++$+++ ::So, I revert everything I added by looking at horrormovies.org? <font face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Gman124|<span style="color:darkblue">Gman</span><span style="color:darkgreen">124</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Gman124|<span style="color:darkblue"> talk</span>]]</sup></font> 15:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

277375 +++$+++ David Kernow +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-13 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.176527880E09 +++$+++ Just spotted your amendment above &ndash; thanks also for tweaking \"Tuva\" &ndash; and know what you mean; unfortunately, though, I'd say the nature of the \"[flag] ''placename''\" format steers the alignment toward the vertical, as ''placename''s can be (very) variable in length. I'm not necessarily in favor of retaining the flags in this or other templates using them, but while they're there I felt they may as well be tidy. Yours,  +++$+++ Just spotted your amendment above &ndash; thanks also for tweaking "Tuva" &ndash; and know what you mean; unfortunately, though, I'd say the nature of the "[flag] ''placename''" format steers the alignment toward the vertical, as ''placename''s can be (very) variable in length. I'm not necessarily in favor of retaining the flags in this or other templates using them, but while they're there I felt they may as well be tidy. Yours, [[User:David Kernow|David Kernow]] <span style="font-size:90%;">[[User talk:David Kernow|(talk)]]</span> 22:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
277376 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277375 +++$+++ 277375 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.176529380E09 +++$+++ ''You could still order them to be alphabetical by row while retaining the column-based layout, it would just require some rearranging of the items.  +++$+++ : ''You could still order them to be alphabetical by row while retaining the column-based layout, it would just require some rearranging of the items. [[User:Lexicon|Lexicon]] <small>[[User talk:Lexicon|(talk)]]</small> 22:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
277377 +++$+++ David Kernow +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277375 +++$+++ 277376 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.176533040E09 +++$+++ True; and it occurred to me that the membership of the template is unlikely to change (at least for some time!) so I've just gone to try the new the format and seen you've already done so &ndash; nice! &nbsp;Best wishes,  +++$+++ :: True; and it occurred to me that the membership of the template is unlikely to change (at least for some time!) so I've just gone to try the new the format and seen you've already done so &ndash; nice! &nbsp;Best wishes, [[User:David Kernow|David]] <span style="font-size:90%;">([[User talk:David Kernow|talk]])</span> 23:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

89920 +++$+++ Sadads +++$+++ Stone +++$+++ 89920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-24 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.295859720E09 +++$+++ I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the [[WP:Online_Ambassadors]] program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador,  +++$+++ I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the [[WP:Online_Ambassadors]] program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 01:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
89921 +++$+++ Sadads +++$+++ Stone +++$+++ 89920 +++$+++ 89920 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.296196620E09 +++$+++ Again, briefly,  +++$+++ :Again, briefly, [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 22:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

15235 +++$+++ RepublicanJacobite +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15235 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-12 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.284353640E09 +++$+++ I left a new comment on the category discussion, withdrawing my nomination.  Thanks for the research you did on the subject.  As I asked over on the discussion page, do you think there is enough information to justify an article?  That would help a great deal with keeping the definition of the subgenre clear and, perhaps, prevent films from being miscategorized.  As we both know, this is a rampant problem.  To wit, Chigurgh's comment above should be ignored, as it clearly indicates he is not here to be helpful.  Cheers! ---<font face=\"Georgia\">''' +++$+++ I left a new comment on the category discussion, withdrawing my nomination.  Thanks for the research you did on the subject.  As I asked over on the discussion page, do you think there is enough information to justify an article?  That would help a great deal with keeping the definition of the subgenre clear and, perhaps, prevent films from being miscategorized.  As we both know, this is a rampant problem.  To wit, Chigurgh's comment above should be ignored, as it clearly indicates he is not here to be helpful.  Cheers! ---<font face="Georgia">'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]'''<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 21:54, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
15236 +++$+++ Chigurgh +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15235 +++$+++ 15235 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.284353700E09 +++$+++ Sorry, if the war adventure cat doesn't get deleted, can I add the cat to Saving Private Ryan? That movie fits war adventure quite well.  +++$+++ :Sorry, if the war adventure cat doesn't get deleted, can I add the cat to Saving Private Ryan? That movie fits war adventure quite well. [[User:Chigurgh|Chigurgh]] ([[User talk:Chigurgh|talk]]) 21:55, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

15237 +++$+++ RepublicanJacobite +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-12 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.284353820E09 +++$+++ If you wouldn't mind, would you take a look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\/Noticeboard#Filmbug.com this] and offer an opinion?  Thanks. ---<font face=\"Georgia\">''' +++$+++ If you wouldn't mind, would you take a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Filmbug.com this] and offer an opinion?  Thanks. ---<font face="Georgia">'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]'''<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 21:57, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
15238 +++$+++ Chigurgh +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15237 +++$+++ 15237 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.284354360E09 +++$+++ That source is not reliable, I used it at my own mistake.  +++$+++ :That source is not reliable, I used it at my own mistake. [[User:Chigurgh|Chigurgh]] ([[User talk:Chigurgh|talk]]) 22:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

539526 +++$+++ Cplakidas +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-02 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.236049680E09 +++$+++ Hello Todor! Since you were involved in my past [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Byzantine navy\/archive1|unsuccessful attempt]] to get the [[Byzantine navy]] article to FA, you may be interested in participating in the [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Byzantine navy|second nomination]] of a much expanded & improved article. Thanks in advance and best regards,  +++$+++ Hello Todor! Since you were involved in my past [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Byzantine navy/archive1|unsuccessful attempt]] to get the [[Byzantine navy]] article to FA, you may be interested in participating in the [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Byzantine navy|second nomination]] of a much expanded & improved article. Thanks in advance and best regards, [[User:Cplakidas|Constantine]]  [[User talk:Cplakidas| ✍ ]] 19:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
539527 +++$+++ Cplakidas +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539526 +++$+++ 539526 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.237227480E09 +++$+++ Hello again! The article has been successfully promoted. Thanks again for your vote! Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hello again! The article has been successfully promoted. Thanks again for your vote! Cheers, [[User:Cplakidas|Constantine]]  [[User talk:Cplakidas| ✍ ]] 11:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

277386 +++$+++ RaveenS +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.176924300E09 +++$+++ We have a potential serial misuse of [[WP:HOAX]] tag issue on Sri Lanka related articles. I have open a request for conflict resolution page on SLR. As a SLR member and as admin your input will be greately appreciated to to decide as to what to do next [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sri_Lanka_Reconciliation#Conflict_resolution see here]. Thanks  +++$+++ We have a potential serial misuse of [[WP:HOAX]] tag issue on Sri Lanka related articles. I have open a request for conflict resolution page on SLR. As a SLR member and as admin your input will be greately appreciated to to decide as to what to do next [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sri_Lanka_Reconciliation#Conflict_resolution see here]. Thanks [[User:RaveenS|RaveenS]] 12:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
277387 +++$+++ RaveenS +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277386 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.176938820E09 +++$+++ I reverted back some of the re addition of [[WP:HOAX]] tags also on the talk page, I also agree with your suggested title for the coinage article. Thanks for your help in trying to clear this mess. If this problem persists even after all the intervention and conflict resolution process we need to take it to the next logical step. +++$+++ ::I reverted back some of the re addition of [[WP:HOAX]] tags also on the talk page, I also agree with your suggested title for the coinage article. Thanks for your help in trying to clear this mess. If this problem persists even after all the intervention and conflict resolution process we need to take it to the next logical step.[[User:RaveenS|RaveenS]] 16:27, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

539531 +++$+++ Egmontaz +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-29 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.238387640E09 +++$+++ Hello! I've translated [[Ivan Alexander]] ([[:el:\u0399\u03b2\u03ac\u03bd \u0391\u03bb\u03b5\u03be\u03ac\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1]]) to greek. I would also like to translate the map mentioned above but it seems to have invalid svg code. Since I'm not very experienced with svg \u0399 wonder if you could check the map again. Thank you! -- +++$+++ Hello! I've translated [[Ivan Alexander]] ([[:el:Ιβάν Αλεξάντερ]]) to greek. I would also like to translate the map mentioned above but it seems to have invalid svg code. Since I'm not very experienced with svg Ι wonder if you could check the map again. Thank you! --[[User:Egmontaz|<b><font color="#082567">Egmontaz</font></b><font color="black">♤</font>]]<i><font color="teal"> <sup>[[User_talk:Egmontaz|talk]]</sup></font></i> 21:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
539532 +++$+++ Egmontaz +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539531 +++$+++ 539531 +++$+++ 2009-04-02 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.238710800E09 +++$+++ No need to thank me, I should thank you instead for your contribution to that article which gave me the opportunity to translate an interesting article. -- +++$+++ :No need to thank me, I should thank you instead for your contribution to that article which gave me the opportunity to translate an interesting article. --[[User:Egmontaz|<b><font color="#082567">Egmontaz</font></b><font color="black">♤</font>]]<i><font color="teal"> <sup>[[User_talk:Egmontaz|talk]]</sup></font></i> 15:20, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

277388 +++$+++ snowolfd4 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.176941100E09 +++$+++ But the other artilces are and still highly dubious, and I will re-add the hoax tags though. The Lion myth article is simply fake as there is no such \"myth\" and it is an attempt to deceive readers, and similarly, the Jaffna Kindom article is fake as there has never been a \"Jaffna Kingdom\" in the past, as claimed in the article. -- +++$+++ But the other artilces are and still highly dubious, and I will re-add the hoax tags though. The Lion myth article is simply fake as there is no such "myth" and it is an attempt to deceive readers, and similarly, the Jaffna Kindom article is fake as there has never been a "Jaffna Kingdom" in the past, as claimed in the article. --[[User:snowolfd4|<font color="#9696A0" face="Tahoma">'''snowolf'''</font><font color="#0A0096" face="tahoma">'''D4'''</font>]]<sup>( <font color="#339966" face="Constantia">[[User_Talk:Snowolfd4| '''talk''']]</font> / <font color="#CC0099" face="Constantia">[[Special:Emailuser/Snowolfd4| '''@''']]</font> )</sup> 17:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
277389 +++$+++ RaveenS +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277388 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.176943320E09 +++$+++ If you are so sure that Jaffna Kingdom did not exist why don\u2019t you take it to [[WP:AFD]] and see what reasonable, neutral Wikipedians think about it rather than to potentially maliciously  tagging article as suggested by Lexicon. If intereted in improving the article see [[Talk:Jaffna_Kingdom#Hoax_tag]] +++$+++ ::If you are so sure that Jaffna Kingdom did not exist why don’t you take it to [[WP:AFD]] and see what reasonable, neutral Wikipedians think about it rather than to potentially maliciously  tagging article as suggested by Lexicon. If intereted in improving the article see [[Talk:Jaffna_Kingdom#Hoax_tag]][[User:RaveenS|RaveenS]] 17:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

539533 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539533 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-01 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.238633040E09 +++$+++ <div class=\"user-block\"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] {{#if:|You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''time'''|You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for hundreds of years}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for {{#if:S. Per [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Digwuren#General_restriction]]|'''incessantly spreading bourgeois nationalist Bulgarian propaganda. As an [[Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization|IMRO]] member and a lackey of the Tsar, you have no place among the workers' and working peasants' alliance moving forward to build socialism. You already fought about three failed wars against Greece and Serbia: can you not renounce these expansionist delusions and comfort yourself with building socialism in one country?''' Per [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Digwuren#General_restriction]]|[[Wikipedia:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]].  If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the \"nowiki\" tags. --><nowiki>{{<\/nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}<\/nowiki><!-- Do not include the \"nowiki\" tags. --> below. {{#if:|[[User:Biruitorul|\u2248 jossi \u2248]] <small>[[User_talk:Biruitorul|(talk)]]<\/small> 21:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)}}<\/div><!-- Template:uw-block1 -->  +++$+++ <div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] {{#if:|You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''time'''|You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for hundreds of years}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for {{#if:S. Per [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Digwuren#General_restriction]]|'''incessantly spreading bourgeois nationalist Bulgarian propaganda. As an [[Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization|IMRO]] member and a lackey of the Tsar, you have no place among the workers' and working peasants' alliance moving forward to build socialism. You already fought about three failed wars against Greece and Serbia: can you not renounce these expansionist delusions and comfort yourself with building socialism in one country?''' Per [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Digwuren#General_restriction]]|[[Wikipedia:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]].  If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|[[User:Biruitorul|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Biruitorul|(talk)]]</small> 21:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 17:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
539534 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539533 +++$+++ 539533 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.238637180E09 +++$+++ Please unblock me, I am innocent! I am a faithful servant of our great <strike>Tsar<\/strike> General Secretary. I have always been a devoted communist and internationalist! Long live Balkania! ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : Please unblock me, I am innocent! I am a faithful servant of our great <strike>Tsar</strike> General Secretary. I have always been a devoted communist and internationalist! Long live Balkania! ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 18:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
539535 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539533 +++$+++ 539534 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.238637840E09 +++$+++ [[File:TrotskySlayingtheDragon1918.jpg|thumb|200px]]Welcome to the class struggle, comrade! (Granted, this guy has long been blacklisted - indeed murdered by our Glorious Teacher Stalin, but his sentiment was correct back then.) -  +++$+++ ::[[File:TrotskySlayingtheDragon1918.jpg|thumb|200px]]Welcome to the class struggle, comrade! (Granted, this guy has long been blacklisted - indeed murdered by our Glorious Teacher Stalin, but his sentiment was correct back then.) - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 19:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

541708 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-26 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.214528520E09 +++$+++ Hey, [[User:BOZ\/Images|psst]].  :)  +++$+++ Hey, [[User:BOZ/Images|psst]].  :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 18:02, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
541709 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541708 +++$+++ 541708 +++$+++ 2008-06-26 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.214530080E09 +++$+++ Well that's handy.  Thanks!   +++$+++ :Well that's handy.  Thanks!  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 18:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

314753 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ ElKevbo +++$+++ 314753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-11 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.152666060E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome.  I agree with you that it improves the article.  I have a couple more here that I am planning to add.  Is there any fact in particular that you would like to see referenced before I remove the tag?  Thanks,  +++$+++ You're very welcome.  I agree with you that it improves the article.  I have a couple more here that I am planning to add.  Is there any fact in particular that you would like to see referenced before I remove the tag?  Thanks, [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 18:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
314754 +++$+++ ElKevbo +++$+++ ElKevbo +++$+++ 314753 +++$+++ 314753 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.152668760E09 +++$+++ You're welcome to remove the tag.  I'm confident that the article is now in good hands.  -- +++$+++ :You're welcome to remove the tag.  I'm confident that the article is now in good hands.  --[[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] 18:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
314755 +++$+++ Johntex +++$+++ ElKevbo +++$+++ 314753 +++$+++ 314754 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.152669540E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  We have a nice [[Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Texas at Austin|WikiProject for UT]], and there is another one for the state of Texas, and a third one for the state of Oklahoma, so there are quite a lot of active Wikipedians who help out with this section.  I'll remove the tag.  Best,  +++$+++ ::Thanks!  We have a nice [[Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Texas at Austin|WikiProject for UT]], and there is another one for the state of Texas, and a third one for the state of Oklahoma, so there are quite a lot of active Wikipedians who help out with this section.  I'll remove the tag.  Best, [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 18:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

277394 +++$+++ Dorvaq +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277394 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-20 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.177123500E09 +++$+++ I was wondering if you would be willing to lend me a hand on the aforementioned article.  People (or a person) claiming to be from Oakwood keep removing the pie chart depicting the demographic breakup of the town for no good reason.  I am not the creator of the chart, but I don't see why it should be removed either. Thanks. \u2014  +++$+++ I was wondering if you would be willing to lend me a hand on the aforementioned article.  People (or a person) claiming to be from Oakwood keep removing the pie chart depicting the demographic breakup of the town for no good reason.  I am not the creator of the chart, but I don't see why it should be removed either. Thanks. — [[User:Dorvaq|Dorvaq]] <small>([[User_talk:Dorvaq|talk]])</small> 19:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
277395 +++$+++ Dorvaq +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277394 +++$+++ 277394 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.177124760E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your prompt assistance, and I will keep you informed. \u2014  +++$+++ :Thank you for your prompt assistance, and I will keep you informed. — [[User:Dorvaq|Dorvaq]] <small>([[User_talk:Dorvaq|talk]])</small> 20:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

277398 +++$+++ Njg123 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-25 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.177541100E09 +++$+++ Sincere regrets.   +++$+++ Sincere regrets.  [[User:Njg123|Njg123]] 15:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
277399 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277398 +++$+++ 277398 +++$+++ 2007-04-21 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.177203900E09 +++$+++ ''Are you serious?  You actually added all those?  That's a ridiculous TfD that I just closed, now all those deletion templates have to come off.  +++$+++ : ''Are you serious?  You actually added all those?  That's a ridiculous TfD that I just closed, now all those deletion templates have to come off. [[User:Lexicon|Lexicon]] <small>[[User talk:Lexicon|(talk)]]</small> 18:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

277400 +++$+++ David Kernow +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-21 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.177204140E09 +++$+++ Certainly did seem faintly ridiculous! &nbsp;I'll stop adding further templates now and will happily remove the tags if a bot isn't or won't soon be available. Thanks,  +++$+++ Certainly did seem faintly ridiculous! &nbsp;I'll stop adding further templates now and will happily remove the tags if a bot isn't or won't soon be available. Thanks, [[User:David Kernow|David]] <span style="font-size:90%;">([[User talk:David Kernow|talk]])</span> 18:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
277401 +++$+++ David Kernow +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277400 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-21 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.177204680E09 +++$+++ \"Amen!\" &nbsp;I've begun stripping the tags from the extra templates &ndash; my ulterior motive was to generate my own list of them! &ndash; and should have most if not all removed soon. Yours,  +++$+++ :: "Amen!" &nbsp;I've begun stripping the tags from the extra templates &ndash; my ulterior motive was to generate my own list of them! &ndash; and should have most if not all removed soon. Yours, [[User:David Kernow|David]] <span style="font-size:90%;">([[User talk:David Kernow|talk]])</span> 18:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

277402 +++$+++ Cool Blue +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-24 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.177402920E09 +++$+++ I moved Transport in the People's Republic of China to Transportation in the People's Republic of China, unaware that you had previously moved it. I moved it because there was a naming convention issue, and all other transport offshoot articles relating to places were ''transportation'', not ''transport''. If you would like to discuss this further, I'd be happy to receive a response at [[User talk:Cool Blue|my talk page]]. Thank you, and good luck editing!  +++$+++ I moved Transport in the People's Republic of China to Transportation in the People's Republic of China, unaware that you had previously moved it. I moved it because there was a naming convention issue, and all other transport offshoot articles relating to places were ''transportation'', not ''transport''. If you would like to discuss this further, I'd be happy to receive a response at [[User talk:Cool Blue|my talk page]]. Thank you, and good luck editing! [[User:Cool Blue|<b><font color="#000FFF">Cool</font><font color="#000FFF"> Blue</font></b>]][[User talk:Cool Blue|<font color="#800000"><sup>Light my Fire!</sup></font>]] 01:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
277403 +++$+++ Cool Blue +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277402 +++$+++ 277402 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.177403580E09 +++$+++ Thank you for pointing that out for me. I'll undo my edit, and maybe move some of those pages, due to the naming convention.  +++$+++ :Thank you for pointing that out for me. I'll undo my edit, and maybe move some of those pages, due to the naming convention. [[User:Cool Blue|<b><font color="#000FFF">Cool</font><font color="#000FFF"> Blue</font></b>]][[User talk:Cool Blue|<font color="#800000"><sup>Light my Fire!</sup></font>]] 01:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

277404 +++$+++ Renrenren +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-24 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.177459740E09 +++$+++ It is already listed on the page.  Actually, this page has a few shortcomings that I will look at when I have a bit more time on my hands.  -- +++$+++ It is already listed on the page.  Actually, this page has a few shortcomings that I will look at when I have a bit more time on my hands.  --[[User:Renrenren|Renrenren]] 17:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
277405 +++$+++ Renrenren +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277404 +++$+++ 277404 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.177460040E09 +++$+++ No problem.. my summary probably didn`t give enough details.  Have a great day.-- +++$+++ *No problem.. my summary probably didn`t give enough details.  Have a great day.--[[User:Renrenren|Renrenren]] 17:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

277407 +++$+++ Dr who1975 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-01 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.178003820E09 +++$+++ Hey there. Saw your comment and I was wondering... is there a Muslim freemason group? They beleive in one god. I tried looking it up and I only found how some Anti Masonic Muslims equate freemasonry with Zionism. Seems like there should be a Muslim freemason group or something about freemasonry in the muslim world. Let me know?-- +++$+++ Hey there. Saw your comment and I was wondering... is there a Muslim freemason group? They beleive in one god. I tried looking it up and I only found how some Anti Masonic Muslims equate freemasonry with Zionism. Seems like there should be a Muslim freemason group or something about freemasonry in the muslim world. Let me know?--[[User:Dr who1975|Dr who1975]] 00:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
277408 +++$+++ Dr who1975 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277407 +++$+++ 277407 +++$+++ 2007-05-01 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.178010240E09 +++$+++ Haven't heard from you .... let me clarify. Surely there are sub organizations that exist for Freemasons of certain faiths... for instance... the scottish Rite has references to Noah. Even if not by beleif... there are still groups that are organized by regions. So what is the binding force for Freemasonry in the Muslim world?-- +++$+++ :Haven't heard from you .... let me clarify. Surely there are sub organizations that exist for Freemasons of certain faiths... for instance... the scottish Rite has references to Noah. Even if not by beleif... there are still groups that are organized by regions. So what is the binding force for Freemasonry in the Muslim world?--[[User:Dr who1975|Dr who1975]] 02:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
277409 +++$+++ Dimts +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277407 +++$+++ 277407 +++$+++ 2007-05-01 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.178027760E09 +++$+++ Greetings. Thank you for showing me the proper way of submitting an edit summary. I also want to remind that English is not my native language (as my top userbox hints). That is why it is hard for me to see the difference between the British and American dialects of this great language. I know that \"candy\" is the American version of the word \"sweets\", but the -ise\/-ize endings are a harder case. Well, thanks for the message. Good luck. +++$+++ :Greetings. Thank you for showing me the proper way of submitting an edit summary. I also want to remind that English is not my native language (as my top userbox hints). That is why it is hard for me to see the difference between the British and American dialects of this great language. I know that "candy" is the American version of the word "sweets", but the -ise/-ize endings are a harder case. Well, thanks for the message. Good luck.[[User:Dimts|Dimts]] 06:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

526832 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.191828720E09 +++$+++ Looks like you need to remove your wikibreak sign-;)  +++$+++ Looks like you need to remove your wikibreak sign-;) [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 00:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
526833 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526832 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.191828960E09 +++$+++ Breaks are good. THings been going fine lately. See email I just sent.  +++$+++ ::Breaks are good. THings been going fine lately. See email I just sent. [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 00:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
526834 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526832 +++$+++ 526832 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.192005720E09 +++$+++ It is not a trophy.  But it is awarded.  &mdash;  +++$+++ : It is not a trophy.  But it is awarded.  &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 01:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

15266 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-31 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.288508580E09 +++$+++ }}  <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ }}  <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 00:03, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
15267 +++$+++ Shubinator +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15266 +++$+++ 15266 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.288515480E09 +++$+++ Mutant Girls Squad has been removed from the main page due to plagiarism concerns. It didn't spend much time on the main page, so if it's cleaned up we could probably put it up again.  +++$+++ :Mutant Girls Squad has been removed from the main page due to plagiarism concerns. It didn't spend much time on the main page, so if it's cleaned up we could probably put it up again. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 01:58, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

46235 +++$+++ Schwede66 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46235 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-11 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.278847620E09 +++$+++ {{od|::::}}Thanks for being vigilant - this came as a surprise. I've amended your contribution above, as I think you copied the wrong category name into your contribution. That amended list looks good now, unless Adabow spots anything additional. Not sure whether it matters for your bot, but [[:Category:Local political office-holders in New Zealand]] is already within a sub-category of [[:Category:Politics of New Zealand]]. The others may also be, but I haven't checked. '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ {{od|::::}}Thanks for being vigilant - this came as a surprise. I've amended your contribution above, as I think you copied the wrong category name into your contribution. That amended list looks good now, unless Adabow spots anything additional. Not sure whether it matters for your bot, but [[:Category:Local political office-holders in New Zealand]] is already within a sub-category of [[:Category:Politics of New Zealand]]. The others may also be, but I haven't checked. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Schwede66|Schwede]]</font><font color="#FF4500">[[User talk:Schwede66|66]]</font>''' 04:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
46236 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46235 +++$+++ 46235 +++$+++ 2010-07-11 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.278849000E09 +++$+++ Ah, I meant [[:Category:Subdivisions of New Zealand]]. Thanks for the note on the duplicates, I use the remove duplicates function in AWB after putting a list together.  +++$+++ :Ah, I meant [[:Category:Subdivisions of New Zealand]]. Thanks for the note on the duplicates, I use the remove duplicates function in AWB after putting a list together. [[User:XLerate|XLerate]] ([[User talk:XLerate#top|talk]]) 04:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
46237 +++$+++ Alan_Liefting +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46235 +++$+++ 46236 +++$+++ 2010-07-11 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.278904740E09 +++$+++ Looks like the bot is a little too generous with shoving talk pages into the WPNZ politics task force. [[Wind power in New Zealand\u200e ]], [[Stockton Mine\u200e]], [[Wind power in New Zealand\u200e]], [[Reefton Power Station\u200e]] are a few of the pages on my watchlist that the bot have tagged. I don't think these should be in the politics task force. Cheers. --  +++$+++ ::Looks like the bot is a little too generous with shoving talk pages into the WPNZ politics task force. [[Wind power in New Zealand‎ ]], [[Stockton Mine‎]], [[Wind power in New Zealand‎]], [[Reefton Power Station‎]] are a few of the pages on my watchlist that the bot have tagged. I don't think these should be in the politics task force. Cheers. -- [[User:Alan Liefting|Alan Liefting]] ([[User_talk:Alan_Liefting|talk]]) - 20:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
46238 +++$+++ Schwede66 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46235 +++$+++ 46237 +++$+++ 2010-07-11 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.278909960E09 +++$+++ That'd be because [[:Category:Energy in New Zealand]] is a sub-category of [[:Category:Politics of New Zealand]]. Is that intentional? '''<font color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ :::That'd be because [[:Category:Energy in New Zealand]] is a sub-category of [[:Category:Politics of New Zealand]]. Is that intentional? '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Schwede66|Schwede]]</font><font color="#FF4500">[[User talk:Schwede66|66]]</font>''' 21:46, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
46239 +++$+++ Alan_Liefting +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46235 +++$+++ 46238 +++$+++ 2010-07-12 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.278918060E09 +++$+++ It shouldn't be. I will change it. --  +++$+++ ::::It shouldn't be. I will change it. -- [[User:Alan Liefting|Alan Liefting]] ([[User_talk:Alan_Liefting|talk]]) - 00:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
46240 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46235 +++$+++ 46239 +++$+++ 2010-07-12 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.278918600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for bringing this up, I'll untag articles in that category. I aim to only tag items where there's no contention.  +++$+++ :::::Thanks for bringing this up, I'll untag articles in that category. I aim to only tag items where there's no contention. [[User:XLerate|XLerate]] ([[User talk:XLerate#top|talk]]) 00:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

539558 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-15 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.239853920E09 +++$+++ This is the backbone of our GDP. Bulgarian bananas look photorealistic on smaller resolutions, but once you zoom in, you realize they're just fakes of Ecuadorian originals. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ This is the backbone of our GDP. Bulgarian bananas look photorealistic on smaller resolutions, but once you zoom in, you realize they're just fakes of Ecuadorian originals. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 20:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
539559 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539558 +++$+++ 539558 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.239886440E09 +++$+++ Bah, you guys disappoint me. Here we have a censorship law that will make, for instance, publication of the German Wikipedia in your country a punishable offense. And all I get for pointing that out is a bunch of fake bananas? I want some real bananas, or a real report, at least.  +++$+++ : Bah, you guys disappoint me. Here we have a censorship law that will make, for instance, publication of the German Wikipedia in your country a punishable offense. And all I get for pointing that out is a bunch of fake bananas? I want some real bananas, or a real report, at least. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 05:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
539560 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539558 +++$+++ 539559 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.239888600E09 +++$+++ \"In the city of York, it is legal to murder a Scotsman within the ancient city walls, but only if he is carrying a bow and arrow.\" ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ :: "In the city of York, it is legal to murder a Scotsman within the ancient city walls, but only if he is carrying a bow and arrow." ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 06:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
539561 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539558 +++$+++ 539560 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.239888960E09 +++$+++ That list is funny, but it's a poor ploy for defending the indefensible. Those funny English \"laws\" are evidently some bits and pieces of medieval rules that are long forgotten, haven't been in force for centuries and it just so happens that nobody ever bothered to formally repeal them. They don't need to be; that's how English law works. But that Bulgarian censorship law was passed a few weeks ago, by people who were evidently fully aware of what they were doing, apparently with the full intent of curtailing the freedom of academic (and other) printed discourse, and we must assume: with a full intention of actually enforcing it. \"Banana republic\" is charitable. This is serious monkey business.  +++$+++ ::: That list is funny, but it's a poor ploy for defending the indefensible. Those funny English "laws" are evidently some bits and pieces of medieval rules that are long forgotten, haven't been in force for centuries and it just so happens that nobody ever bothered to formally repeal them. They don't need to be; that's how English law works. But that Bulgarian censorship law was passed a few weeks ago, by people who were evidently fully aware of what they were doing, apparently with the full intent of curtailing the freedom of academic (and other) printed discourse, and we must assume: with a full intention of actually enforcing it. "Banana republic" is charitable. This is serious monkey business. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 06:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
539562 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539558 +++$+++ 539561 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.239889740E09 +++$+++ Look, I really don't care about some stupid law that nobody would ever enforce. I don't care and I don't even feel like discussing it: if you're so obsessed with it, so be it, just don't involve me, okay? What involved me was your ethnic slurs: I have no relation to that law whatsoever, but I'm still part of a \"stupid idiotic lot of people\" and a proud member of a \"banana republic\" that is doing \"monkey business\". Please don't bother me about it anymore, thanks. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ :::: Look, I really don't care about some stupid law that nobody would ever enforce. I don't care and I don't even feel like discussing it: if you're so obsessed with it, so be it, just don't involve me, okay? What involved me was your ethnic slurs: I have no relation to that law whatsoever, but I'm still part of a "stupid idiotic lot of people" and a proud member of a "banana republic" that is doing "monkey business". Please don't bother me about it anymore, thanks. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 06:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
539563 +++$+++ Future Perfect at Sunrise +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539558 +++$+++ 539562 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.239889860E09 +++$+++ No prob. It wasn't me who made this a personal issue between us two. If you take personal offense on seeing your country criticised, that's your business.  +++$+++ ::::: No prob. It wasn't me who made this a personal issue between us two. If you take personal offense on seeing your country criticised, that's your business. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 06:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
539564 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539558 +++$+++ 539563 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.239890460E09 +++$+++ You're as free to criticize as the next guy, I take no offence in your bashing of this law and I agree with you on this\u2014it's stupid, but at least I know it won't work. It's the slurs, dude, not hard to understand I hope. I've been pointing this out the entire time. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ :::::: You're as free to criticize as the next guy, I take no offence in your bashing of this law and I agree with you on this—it's stupid, but at least I know it won't work. It's the slurs, dude, not hard to understand I hope. I've been pointing this out the entire time. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 07:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
539565 +++$+++ Laveol +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539558 +++$+++ 539563 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.239900660E09 +++$+++ Fut, I'm glad you've got some sleep or a break or whatever. As a German you have no idea about our laws and the way none obey most of them. This one is tricky since it was the Ministry of administration that drafted it (lol) and was intended only for the correct transliteration of the place names in the country. It's been criticized a lot as Todor would tell you if you'd stop taunting him for a moment. '''Rousse''' has been transliterated like that for hundreds of years and now it turns out it's wrong (wtf?!) - it's nice to have a standard, but not in such a lame way. Plus, we're having a much bigger problem with a Communications law proposal that would allow the police to listen in on your telephone and Internet communication with no real reason. If this law passes (he was rejected twice) I'll be the first out of here. There's lameness all around, but it doesn't mean we're all idiots or that our country is more banana than any other in the region\/continent\/world.--''' +++$+++ ::::::Fut, I'm glad you've got some sleep or a break or whatever. As a German you have no idea about our laws and the way none obey most of them. This one is tricky since it was the Ministry of administration that drafted it (lol) and was intended only for the correct transliteration of the place names in the country. It's been criticized a lot as Todor would tell you if you'd stop taunting him for a moment. '''Rousse''' has been transliterated like that for hundreds of years and now it turns out it's wrong (wtf?!) - it's nice to have a standard, but not in such a lame way. Plus, we're having a much bigger problem with a Communications law proposal that would allow the police to listen in on your telephone and Internet communication with no real reason. If this law passes (he was rejected twice) I'll be the first out of here. There's lameness all around, but it doesn't mean we're all idiots or that our country is more banana than any other in the region/continent/world.--'''[[User:Laveol|<font color="#007700">L<font color="#009900">a<font color="#00aa00">v<font color="#00cc00">e</font>o</font>l</font></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Laveol|T]]</sup>''' 09:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
539566 +++$+++ Avg +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539558 +++$+++ 539565 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.239926640E09 +++$+++ That's a pan-european issue Laveol. This law is an EU directive that passed on the 6th of April. We're a big banana republic. All 27 of us.-- +++$+++ :::::::That's a pan-european issue Laveol. This law is an EU directive that passed on the 6th of April. We're a big banana republic. All 27 of us.--[[User:Avg|Avg]] ([[User talk:Avg|talk]]) 17:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

277417 +++$+++ Taprobanus +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-11 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.178924880E09 +++$+++ A user who has been going aginst consensus and third party opion on the talk page has unilaterally removed a category that you were kind enough to participate in to discuss [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Allegations_of_mass_graves_at_Chemmani&diff=130106274&oldid=129594709 see diff here]. Can you take care of this situation please. Thanks  +++$+++ A user who has been going aginst consensus and third party opion on the talk page has unilaterally removed a category that you were kind enough to participate in to discuss [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_mass_graves_at_Chemmani&diff=130106274&oldid=129594709 see diff here]. Can you take care of this situation please. Thanks [[User:Taprobanus|Taprobanus]] 16:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
277418 +++$+++ Taprobanus +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277417 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-11 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.178925720E09 +++$+++ As yiu can see I think, it is attempt to censor wikipedia, so I will take him to mediation next  +++$+++ ::As yiu can see I think, it is attempt to censor wikipedia, so I will take him to mediation next [[User:Taprobanus|Taprobanus]] 16:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

277420 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-17 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.179424560E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | It takes huge amount of nobility for someone to admit their mistake. It is the rarest of values in WP and the real world, and those who have it deserve our utmost respect. Undoubtedly, you have mine.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | It takes huge amount of nobility for someone to admit their mistake. It is the rarest of values in WP and the real world, and those who have it deserve our utmost respect. Undoubtedly, you have mine. [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 10:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
277421 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277420 +++$+++ 277420 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.179434820E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, Niko.  Admitting my mistakes and apologizing is an incredibly difficult thing for me to do, I assure you.  But clearly I was in the wrong.  I was going to give a more substantial apology than \"My apologies\" but then I thought a simpler apology would be more elegant, and if I went on I might have started to qualify my apology, which just wouldn't do.  I'd hit you with a return barnstar for being so gracious about it, but then that'd look like a barnstar trade.  I'll be keeping an eye out on you for the opportunity.  +++$+++ :Thank you very much, Niko.  Admitting my mistakes and apologizing is an incredibly difficult thing for me to do, I assure you.  But clearly I was in the wrong.  I was going to give a more substantial apology than "My apologies" but then I thought a simpler apology would be more elegant, and if I went on I might have started to qualify my apology, which just wouldn't do.  I'd hit you with a return barnstar for being so gracious about it, but then that'd look like a barnstar trade.  I'll be keeping an eye out on you for the opportunity. [[User:Lexicon|Lexicon]] <small>[[User talk:Lexicon|(talk)]]</small> 13:47, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
277422 +++$+++ N! +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277420 +++$+++ 277421 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.179438000E09 +++$+++ Nobility is always a difficult task; that's what makes it special. Graciousness for already displayed nobility is a fairly easier one. Don't keep an eye on me please; you may spot opportunities for the contrary! :-)  +++$+++ ::Nobility is always a difficult task; that's what makes it special. Graciousness for already displayed nobility is a fairly easier one. Don't keep an eye on me please; you may spot opportunities for the contrary! :-) [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 14:40, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

15280 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-11 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.292137860E09 +++$+++ I do not appreciate you removing my cited Rolling Stone and New York Magazine sources in the \"We R Who We R\" article. They were not vandalism. Please be careful before reverting items like that.  +++$+++ I do not appreciate you removing my cited Rolling Stone and New York Magazine sources in the "We R Who We R" article. They were not vandalism. Please be careful before reverting items like that. [[User:Andrzejbanas|Andrzejbanas]] ([[User talk:Andrzejbanas|talk]]) 23:11, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
15281 +++$+++ L-l-CLK-l-l +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15280 +++$+++ 15280 +++$+++ 2010-12-11 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.292138640E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=We_R_Who_We_R&action=historysubmit&diff=401855536&oldid=401854764 Your edit has been removed]. The first time i apologize as that was my twiggle reading it wrong. BUT, it has now been removed because of inccorect content, your source says, \"\u201cWe R Who We R\u201d was '''allegedly inspired by a drag show''', though '''Ke$ha later claimed it was a response to the bullying of gay teens'''\". Allegedly means it was rumored, rumors are not allowed, especially when the source you cited even says it was wrong, that it was actually inspired by Gay Teens. Please do not add it again. - <font face=\"Malgun Gothic\" color=\"#273BE2\"> +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=We_R_Who_We_R&action=historysubmit&diff=401855536&oldid=401854764 Your edit has been removed]. The first time i apologize as that was my twiggle reading it wrong. BUT, it has now been removed because of inccorect content, your source says, "“We R Who We R” was '''allegedly inspired by a drag show''', though '''Ke$ha later claimed it was a response to the bullying of gay teens'''". Allegedly means it was rumored, rumors are not allowed, especially when the source you cited even says it was wrong, that it was actually inspired by Gay Teens. Please do not add it again. - <font face="Malgun Gothic" color="#273BE2">[[User:L-l-CLK-l-l|(CK)Lakeshade]]</font> - <font face="Malgun Gothic" color="#CCCCFF">[[User talk:L-l-CLK-l-l|talk2me]]</font> - 23:24, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

277428 +++$+++ M. +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.179795960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:M.|Mícheál]] 18:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
277429 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277428 +++$+++ 277428 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.179796500E09 +++$+++ When people say \"Newfoundland\" they very often mean the political entity that has gone by that name.  As I said, prior to the province, there was a Dominion, and before that a Colony.  You also are acting as though only Newfoundlanders will be searching for \"Newfoundland\" which is a ridiculous notion.  I'm sure a great many non-Newfoundlanders are looking the term up, and their intentions are as important as any Newfoundlander's.  A great many of those are not aware that the province is officially called \"Newfoundland and Labrador\" (it hasn't officially been called that for long, actually), and even those who might, might simply type in the \"short form\". This is a worldwide encyclopedia, so we have to cater to a worldwide audience.  As for your argument that we shouldn't treat searches for \"Newfoundland\" and \"Labrador\" differently based on, I guess, some sort of \"things should be consistent\" idea, yes, we damn well should treat them differently.  \"Labrador\" has never been the name of a colony, Dominion, or province.  \"Newfoundland\" has.  Nobody is going to search for \"Labrador\" to find \"Newfoundland and Labrador\", while a very significant number of people who search for \"Newfoundland\" will intend exactly that. We work on what people expect, ''not'' what we might like people to expect.  +++$+++ :When people say "Newfoundland" they very often mean the political entity that has gone by that name.  As I said, prior to the province, there was a Dominion, and before that a Colony.  You also are acting as though only Newfoundlanders will be searching for "Newfoundland" which is a ridiculous notion.  I'm sure a great many non-Newfoundlanders are looking the term up, and their intentions are as important as any Newfoundlander's.  A great many of those are not aware that the province is officially called "Newfoundland and Labrador" (it hasn't officially been called that for long, actually), and even those who might, might simply type in the "short form". This is a worldwide encyclopedia, so we have to cater to a worldwide audience.  As for your argument that we shouldn't treat searches for "Newfoundland" and "Labrador" differently based on, I guess, some sort of "things should be consistent" idea, yes, we damn well should treat them differently.  "Labrador" has never been the name of a colony, Dominion, or province.  "Newfoundland" has.  Nobody is going to search for "Labrador" to find "Newfoundland and Labrador", while a very significant number of people who search for "Newfoundland" will intend exactly that. We work on what people expect, ''not'' what we might like people to expect. [[User:Lexicon|Lexicon]] <small>[[User talk:Lexicon|(talk)]]</small> 18:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

277430 +++$+++ Vulcan's Forge +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.179797100E09 +++$+++ I've added a section heading for this discussion on the Newfoundland (island) discussion page.  +++$+++ I've added a section heading for this discussion on the Newfoundland (island) discussion page. [[User:Vulcan's Forge|Vulcan&#39;s Forge]] 18:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
277431 +++$+++ Vulcan's Forge +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277430 +++$+++ 277430 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.179797580E09 +++$+++ Thanks Lexicon - I just pointed the Newfoundland discussion at the Newfoundland and Labrador one.  Oops.  (Lousy timing.) ;)  +++$+++ :Thanks Lexicon - I just pointed the Newfoundland discussion at the Newfoundland and Labrador one.  Oops.  (Lousy timing.) ;) [[User:Vulcan's Forge|Vulcan&#39;s Forge]] 18:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

15288 +++$+++  +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-11 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.294739340E09 +++$+++ Hi there!  I have undertaken a Good Article review of this article and believe it will soon meet the criteria, but first will require some improvements.  Please [[Talk:House (1977 film)\/GA1|visit the review]] to see what needs to be done!  If work is not commenced within seven days the review will be closed as fail but providing improvement starts within that period I will leave it open until the improvements have been made.  Thanks.  - 01:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ Hi there!  I have undertaken a Good Article review of this article and believe it will soon meet the criteria, but first will require some improvements.  Please [[Talk:House (1977 film)/GA1|visit the review]] to see what needs to be done!  If work is not commenced within seven days the review will be closed as fail but providing improvement starts within that period I will leave it open until the improvements have been made.  Thanks.  - 01:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
15289 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15288 +++$+++ 15288 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.294746840E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your speedy work.  I have responded to your edits.  Much improved, but still a few things to do. -  +++$+++ * Thank you for your speedy work.  I have responded to your edits.  Much improved, but still a few things to do. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 03:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
15290 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15288 +++$+++ 15289 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.294816260E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've gone over your most recent set of changes.  These address almost all the problems, thanks!  The only thing still remaining is to supply a reference for the information about the Eclipse DVD under \"Release\", after which I expectg to pass it as a Good Article. -  +++$+++ ** Hi, I've gone over your most recent set of changes.  These address almost all the problems, thanks!  The only thing still remaining is to supply a reference for the information about the Eclipse DVD under "Release", after which I expectg to pass it as a Good Article. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 23:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
15291 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15288 +++$+++ 15290 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.294818240E09 +++$+++ Congratulations, the film is now listed as a Good Article!  Now that you've been through the process, you might want to consider reviewing an article yourself. -  +++$+++ *** Congratulations, the film is now listed as a Good Article!  Now that you've been through the process, you might want to consider reviewing an article yourself. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 23:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
15292 +++$+++ Mjpresson +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15288 +++$+++ 15291 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.294818840E09 +++$+++ You did an awesome job.-- +++$+++ ****You did an awesome job.--[[User:Mjpresson|Mjpresson]] ([[User talk:Mjpresson|talk]]) 23:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

264692 +++$+++ Angmering +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-23 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.251070560E09 +++$+++ Not a criticism, just a genuine query - is it still right to change it to present tense even though the play doesn't exist any more?  +++$+++ Not a criticism, just a genuine query - is it still right to change it to present tense even though the play doesn't exist any more? [[User:Angmering|Angmering]] ([[User talk:Angmering|talk]]) 16:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
264693 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264692 +++$+++ 264692 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.251075660E09 +++$+++ I would guess on occasions like that, yes, present tense would be appropriate.  +++$+++ :I would guess on occasions like that, yes, present tense would be appropriate. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:01, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

277435 +++$+++ Netsnipe +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277435 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-22 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.179881880E09 +++$+++ I've unblocked Lexicon because I see no clear request on this talk page asking Lexicon to \"cease and desist\". Blocking a fellow administrator over this is in my honest opinion a convoluted point-making exercise that fails the \"preventative, not punitive\" test. -- <small><span style=\"border: 1px solid\"> +++$+++ I've unblocked Lexicon because I see no clear request on this talk page asking Lexicon to "cease and desist". Blocking a fellow administrator over this is in my honest opinion a convoluted point-making exercise that fails the "preventative, not punitive" test. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[User:Netsnipe|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#003333"> &nbsp;Netsnipe&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Netsnipe|<span style="background-color:#003333; color:White">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 17:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
277436 +++$+++ David Gerard +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277435 +++$+++ 277435 +++$+++ 2007-05-22 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.179882480E09 +++$+++ I would have presumed an admin to have a clue about non-free content policy and not act like there's such a thing as fair use under the \"I wanna\" clause of US copyright law. If it was punitive it would have been a lot longer than an hour. I'm not concerned as long as it stops and the user in question (admin or no) doesn't do it or equivalent again -  +++$+++ :I would have presumed an admin to have a clue about non-free content policy and not act like there's such a thing as fair use under the "I wanna" clause of US copyright law. If it was punitive it would have been a lot longer than an hour. I'm not concerned as long as it stops and the user in question (admin or no) doesn't do it or equivalent again - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 18:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
277437 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277435 +++$+++ 277436 +++$+++ 2007-05-22 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.179883200E09 +++$+++ There is no '\"I wanna\" clause\"' being invoked here, David.  As I already noted in my unblock request, I mistakenly (big mistake, but unfortunately I sometimes glance over things) thought that the three criteria in the template which I added to the image pages was enough of a justification for logos (which, in case you hadn't noticed, we had for a very long time not really required fair use rationales for, since the rationales for logos are generic and obvious).  I ''will'' do the \"equivalent\" again, that is, I will work on a semi-generic \"fair use in\" template that can be included on logo image pages, as, like I said, logos are in 99.9% of uses, fair use for the same reason that they exist in the first place: they're important visual representations of the organizations they stand for.   +++$+++ ::There is no '"I wanna" clause"' being invoked here, David.  As I already noted in my unblock request, I mistakenly (big mistake, but unfortunately I sometimes glance over things) thought that the three criteria in the template which I added to the image pages was enough of a justification for logos (which, in case you hadn't noticed, we had for a very long time not really required fair use rationales for, since the rationales for logos are generic and obvious).  I ''will'' do the "equivalent" again, that is, I will work on a semi-generic "fair use in" template that can be included on logo image pages, as, like I said, logos are in 99.9% of uses, fair use for the same reason that they exist in the first place: they're important visual representations of the organizations they stand for.  [[User:Lexicon|Lexicon]] <small>[[User talk:Lexicon|(talk)]]</small> 18:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
277438 +++$+++ David Gerard +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277435 +++$+++ 277437 +++$+++ 2007-05-22 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.179883500E09 +++$+++ Fine, whatever - just don't act in a manner indistinguishable from a clueless \"I wanna\" fair abuser reverting like a clear and present danger -  +++$+++ :::Fine, whatever - just don't act in a manner indistinguishable from a clueless "I wanna" fair abuser reverting like a clear and present danger - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 18:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

15294 +++$+++ RJFJR +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-20 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.295573700E09 +++$+++ What is wrong with the track listing according to the standards?  +++$+++ What is wrong with the track listing according to the standards? [[User:RJFJR|RJFJR]] ([[User talk:RJFJR|talk]]) 17:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
15295 +++$+++ RJFJR +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15294 +++$+++ 15294 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.295576580E09 +++$+++ Thank you.   +++$+++ :Thank you.  [[User:RJFJR|RJFJR]] ([[User talk:RJFJR|talk]]) 18:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

576626 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-21 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.222007160E09 +++$+++ [[Template talk:Infobox Protected area#Missing seconds causing error message|I reported the problem on its talk page]] over two weeks ago, but no-one has responded. Since you recently edited the template (not that I think you caused the problem) and obviously have better template coding skills than I, can you fix it, please? Thank you.  +++$+++ [[Template talk:Infobox Protected area#Missing seconds causing error message|I reported the problem on its talk page]] over two weeks ago, but no-one has responded. Since you recently edited the template (not that I think you caused the problem) and obviously have better template coding skills than I, can you fix it, please? Thank you. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] (User:Pigsonthewing); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Andy's talk]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]] 07:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
576627 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576626 +++$+++ 576626 +++$+++ 2008-09-22 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.222073820E09 +++$+++ I just went and restored it to my last edit at the template. Hopefully that will fix the problems. Sometimes changes to some of the embedded parameters such as the coordinates impacts the infoboxes. I've been pretty busy lately so I must have missed yours and others comments at the template talk page....let me know if you have any other issues.-- +++$+++ :I just went and restored it to my last edit at the template. Hopefully that will fix the problems. Sometimes changes to some of the embedded parameters such as the coordinates impacts the infoboxes. I've been pretty busy lately so I must have missed yours and others comments at the template talk page....let me know if you have any other issues.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 01:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

539594 +++$+++ Againme +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539594 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-29 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.243648800E09 +++$+++ I'm not a troll! I'm making a legitimate question, why is this accident so important. You could ''answer'' with ''reasons'' instead of deleting me! It's very rude to delete other people's commentaries! -- +++$+++ I'm not a troll! I'm making a legitimate question, why is this accident so important. You could ''answer'' with ''reasons'' instead of deleting me! It's very rude to delete other people's commentaries! --[[User:Againme|Againme]] ([[User talk:Againme|talk]]) 19:00, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
539595 +++$+++ Againme +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539594 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.243651500E09 +++$+++ Now, ''that'' is a proper reason (and answer): ''such major bus accidents with so many victims are rare, and for countries the size of Bulgaria this is a huge tragedy and the event of the year so far'', it has '''nothing to do with respect'''. -- +++$+++ ::Now, ''that'' is a proper reason (and answer): ''such major bus accidents with so many victims are rare, and for countries the size of Bulgaria this is a huge tragedy and the event of the year so far'', it has '''nothing to do with respect'''. --[[User:Againme|Againme]] ([[User talk:Againme|talk]]) 19:45, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
539596 +++$+++ Laveol +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539594 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.243653000E09 +++$+++ Hmmm, don't tell me you didn't see the template that preceded your comment. The one saying that part of the article was on the news and probably on the main wiki page. --''' +++$+++ :::Hmmm, don't tell me you didn't see the template that preceded your comment. The one saying that part of the article was on the news and probably on the main wiki page. --'''[[User:Laveol|<font color="#007700">L<font color="#009900">a<font color="#00aa00">v<font color="#00cc00">e</font>o</font>l</font></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Laveol|T]]</sup>''' 20:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
539597 +++$+++ Againme +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539594 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.243653660E09 +++$+++ I did not! But anyway, I wrote part of those stories in the press and are against that being considered notable... seriously. -- +++$+++ ::::I did not! But anyway, I wrote part of those stories in the press and are against that being considered notable... seriously. --[[User:Againme|Againme]] ([[User talk:Againme|talk]]) 20:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
539598 +++$+++ Laveol +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539594 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.243654380E09 +++$+++ Well, that's your personal view. What a pity wiki policies are against you on this. --''' +++$+++ :::::Well, that's your personal view. What a pity wiki policies are against you on this. --'''[[User:Laveol|<font color="#007700">L<font color="#009900">a<font color="#00aa00">v<font color="#00cc00">e</font>o</font>l</font></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Laveol|T]]</sup>''' 20:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
539599 +++$+++ Againme +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539594 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.243654920E09 +++$+++ Hehe :) Must be that I know the media, and Wikipedia just follows it blindly. Ok, goodbye -- +++$+++ ::::::Hehe :) Must be that I know the media, and Wikipedia just follows it blindly. Ok, goodbye --[[User:Againme|Againme]] ([[User talk:Againme|talk]]) 20:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

395767 +++$+++ Crazynas +++$+++ Edgar181 +++$+++ 395767 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.312437120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User: Crazynas|Crazynas]]<sup> [[User_talk:Crazynas|t]]</sup> 22:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
395768 +++$+++ Edgar181 +++$+++ Edgar181 +++$+++ 395767 +++$+++ 395767 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.312437960E09 +++$+++ I don't think we should have any tolerance for individuals who are only here to attack people.  It is not unusual for administrators to block such editors on sight, and that's what I regularly do.  It's not punitive, but rather prudent action to prevent further violations of Wikipedia's [[WP:BLP|BLP policy]].  --  +++$+++ :I don't think we should have any tolerance for individuals who are only here to attack people.  It is not unusual for administrators to block such editors on sight, and that's what I regularly do.  It's not punitive, but rather prudent action to prevent further violations of Wikipedia's [[WP:BLP|BLP policy]].  -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 23:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
395769 +++$+++ Crazynas +++$+++ Edgar181 +++$+++ 395767 +++$+++ 395768 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.312506180E09 +++$+++ I suppose, and this really has nothing to do with you specifically but, I'm trying to figure out in my own mind where [[WP:BLP|BLP]] and [[WP:BITE|not biting]] meet, and where the happy medium is.  I wonder what the ''false positive'' rate is on blocking users that made apparently unconstructive edits but '''would have''' returned to the project as a positive contributors.  Although it was a different time, my [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/The Independent Federation of the Republic|own]] start to Wikipedia was a bit rocky and if I had been [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|labeled]] I might not have stayed around. (Note that this isn't, at this point a request to unblock the [[User:Judas12345|user]] or commenting on anything specific on '''that''' block, but an attempt to clarify\/understand and put my two cents in).<\/br> +++$+++ ::I suppose, and this really has nothing to do with you specifically but, I'm trying to figure out in my own mind where [[WP:BLP|BLP]] and [[WP:BITE|not biting]] meet, and where the happy medium is.  I wonder what the ''false positive'' rate is on blocking users that made apparently unconstructive edits but '''would have''' returned to the project as a positive contributors.  Although it was a different time, my [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Independent Federation of the Republic|own]] start to Wikipedia was a bit rocky and if I had been [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|labeled]] I might not have stayed around. (Note that this isn't, at this point a request to unblock the [[User:Judas12345|user]] or commenting on anything specific on '''that''' block, but an attempt to clarify/understand and put my two cents in).</br>[[User: Crazynas|Crazynas]]<sup> [[User_talk:Crazynas|t]]</sup> 18:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
395770 +++$+++ Edgar181 +++$+++ Edgar181 +++$+++ 395767 +++$+++ 395769 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312508460E09 +++$+++ At the risk of sounding like a lawyer, I would note that BITE is a behavior ''guideline'' while BLP is a ''policy''.  BLP is in fact one of the policies that the Wikimedia Foundation takes most seriously.  See for example [http:\/\/wikimediafoundation.org\/wiki\/Resolution:Biographies_of_living_people Resolution:Biographies_of_living_people].  Therefore whenever BITE and BLP are at odds, BLP should take precedence.  From a purely ethical standpoint, I believe that because Wikipedia has such a prominent online role and consequently has the power to do real harm to individuals when negative material is present, Wikipedia has an obligation to minimize that potential harm.  Being firm (even bitey) in dealing with individuals who violate our BLP policy is entirely consistent with that view.  --  +++$+++ :::At the risk of sounding like a lawyer, I would note that BITE is a behavior ''guideline'' while BLP is a ''policy''.  BLP is in fact one of the policies that the Wikimedia Foundation takes most seriously.  See for example [http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Biographies_of_living_people Resolution:Biographies_of_living_people].  Therefore whenever BITE and BLP are at odds, BLP should take precedence.  From a purely ethical standpoint, I believe that because Wikipedia has such a prominent online role and consequently has the power to do real harm to individuals when negative material is present, Wikipedia has an obligation to minimize that potential harm.  Being firm (even bitey) in dealing with individuals who violate our BLP policy is entirely consistent with that view.  -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 18:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

15308 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-28 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.298882220E09 +++$+++ Please lay out your case, and I'll block if you are convincing. I can see the that AscherSE4N repeated an edit, but the rest of the behaviour doesn't overlap in a quick look. AscherSE4N has mainly edited by trying to categorize Disney stars as \"female Christians\". Anything in P\xe9 de Chinelo's history that would correspond?&mdash; +++$+++ Please lay out your case, and I'll block if you are convincing. I can see the that AscherSE4N repeated an edit, but the rest of the behaviour doesn't overlap in a quick look. AscherSE4N has mainly edited by trying to categorize Disney stars as "female Christians". Anything in Pé de Chinelo's history that would correspond?&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 00:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
15309 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15308 +++$+++ 15308 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.298941800E09 +++$+++ Hello Andrzejbanas. I am guessing that even 10,000 apologies would not be enough. As you may have already seen - with this edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKww&action=historysubmit&diff=416392857&oldid=416367508] you were proven right in your surmise that P\xe9 was back. I was so used to his ugly, attack edit summaries that when they weren't there I applied too much AGF. I hope that you can forgive me one day. I hope that you have a great week in spite of this.  +++$+++ :Hello Andrzejbanas. I am guessing that even 10,000 apologies would not be enough. As you may have already seen - with this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKww&action=historysubmit&diff=416392857&oldid=416367508] you were proven right in your surmise that Pé was back. I was so used to his ugly, attack edit summaries that when they weren't there I applied too much AGF. I hope that you can forgive me one day. I hope that you have a great week in spite of this. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 17:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
15310 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15308 +++$+++ 15309 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.298943600E09 +++$+++ I don't see a need for apologies ... Andrzejbanas came to a conclusion before anybody else, but no one said he was particularly wrong to do so. When this guy pops up again, drop me a note, and I'll deal with it aggressively. I've erased all contributions from AscherSE4N, and I will continue to do so for further socks.&mdash; +++$+++ ::I don't see a need for apologies ... Andrzejbanas came to a conclusion before anybody else, but no one said he was particularly wrong to do so. When this guy pops up again, drop me a note, and I'll deal with it aggressively. I've erased all contributions from AscherSE4N, and I will continue to do so for further socks.&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 17:40, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

177314 +++$+++ Ayceman +++$+++ RandomCritic +++$+++ 177314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-12 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.292189160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your input -- +++$+++ Thanks for your input --[[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 13:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
177315 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ RandomCritic +++$+++ 177314 +++$+++ 177314 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.296026400E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing![[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  23:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

277454 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-07 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.181277000E09 +++$+++ Straight anglicized n, no tilde.  +++$+++ Straight anglicized n, no tilde. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 21:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
277455 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277454 +++$+++ 277454 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.181473560E09 +++$+++ ''For the Mediation Committee,'' ''' +++$+++ :''For the Mediation Committee,'' '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 04:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

277457 +++$+++ Renrenren +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-12 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.181685600E09 +++$+++ Hello Lexicon.  You seem to have experience dealing with this character.  I'm pretty sure he's showing his face again at [[Talk:Conseil_scolaire_de_district_du_Centre-Sud-Ouest]].  I'm a novice at wikipedia and I know you've dealt with him in the past.  I don`t know where I should report this.  Could you please deal with it somehow?  -- +++$+++ Hello Lexicon.  You seem to have experience dealing with this character.  I'm pretty sure he's showing his face again at [[Talk:Conseil_scolaire_de_district_du_Centre-Sud-Ouest]].  I'm a novice at wikipedia and I know you've dealt with him in the past.  I don`t know where I should report this.  Could you please deal with it somehow?  --[[User:Renrenren|Renrenren]] 15:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
277458 +++$+++ Renrenren +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277457 +++$+++ 277457 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.181720220E09 +++$+++ He's bound to blow his lid once again.  Thanks for your help.-- +++$+++ :He's bound to blow his lid once again.  Thanks for your help.--[[User:Renrenren|Renrenren]] 00:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

277459 +++$+++ Renrenren +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-14 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.181857260E09 +++$+++ Sorry if I messed up that revert... I saw that someone vandalised your userpage and figured I'd clean it up but I must have reverted to the wrong version.  -- +++$+++ Sorry if I messed up that revert... I saw that someone vandalised your userpage and figured I'd clean it up but I must have reverted to the wrong version.  --[[User:Renrenren|Renrenren]] 14:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
277460 +++$+++ Renrenren +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277459 +++$+++ 277459 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.181863800E09 +++$+++ My first thought was also Wikiwoo, but you're right.. not the same style.-- +++$+++ :My first thought was also Wikiwoo, but you're right.. not the same style.--[[User:Renrenren|Renrenren]] 16:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

277463 +++$+++ Tariqabjotu +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-15 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.181973000E09 +++$+++ The mediation process, starting with opening statements, has begun on [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation\/AMG Chemmani]]. If you do not have the page watchlisted, I would recommend you add it to your watchlist when you get the chance. I probably won't be notifying each involved editor at every step, and the talk page should be quite active over the course of the mediation. Thanks again for waiting. -- ''' +++$+++ The mediation process, starting with opening statements, has begun on [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/AMG Chemmani]]. If you do not have the page watchlisted, I would recommend you add it to your watchlist when you get the chance. I probably won't be notifying each involved editor at every step, and the talk page should be quite active over the course of the mediation. Thanks again for waiting. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 22:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
277464 +++$+++ Tariqabjotu +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277463 +++$+++ 277463 +++$+++ 2007-06-19 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.182301080E09 +++$+++ I'm just here issuing another reminder that the mediation has begun on [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation\/AMG Chemmani]]. Please add your opening statement when you get the chance. -- ''' +++$+++ :I'm just here issuing another reminder that the mediation has begun on [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/AMG Chemmani]]. Please add your opening statement when you get the chance. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 17:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

15320 +++$+++ Darkwarriorblake +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-11 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.307843760E09 +++$+++ Hello, about your edit on the above article.  Would the category 'American Mystery Films' not be applicable?  The central theme of the film is a 'whodunit' mystery as explained in the lead.  +++$+++ Hello, about your edit on the above article.  Would the category 'American Mystery Films' not be applicable?  The central theme of the film is a 'whodunit' mystery as explained in the lead. [[User:Darkwarriorblake|Darkwarriorblake]] ([[User talk:Darkwarriorblake|talk]]) 18:56, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
15321 +++$+++ Darkwarriorblake +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15320 +++$+++ 15320 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.307862360E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, mystery isn't the primary genre, I hadn't thought of it that way\/.  +++$+++ :Fair enough, mystery isn't the primary genre, I hadn't thought of it that way/. [[User:Darkwarriorblake|Darkwarriorblake]] ([[User talk:Darkwarriorblake|talk]]) 00:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

526842 +++$+++ Omotorwayo +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526842 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-15 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.192442940E09 +++$+++ Hello ERcheck. I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate your assertion of notability of my Wiki entry on the musician [[Cristian Fleming|Unit]]. My hours of work haven't gone to waste, and it has renewed my respect for the greatest encyclopedia in the world, Wikipedia!  +++$+++ Hello ERcheck. I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate your assertion of notability of my Wiki entry on the musician [[Cristian Fleming|Unit]]. My hours of work haven't gone to waste, and it has renewed my respect for the greatest encyclopedia in the world, Wikipedia! [[User:Omotorwayo|Omotorwayo]] 03:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
526843 +++$+++ Omotorwayo +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526842 +++$+++ 526842 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.192479660E09 +++$+++ Okay, I misunderstood. I'll add citations as you request some time on 10\/15\/07 (and the only reason I haven't yet is because I hadn't figured out the commands for inserting them. Well, I'm glad there wasn't a speedy deletion of the article anyway. Thanks for the information.  +++$+++ :Okay, I misunderstood. I'll add citations as you request some time on 10/15/07 (and the only reason I haven't yet is because I hadn't figured out the commands for inserting them. Well, I'm glad there wasn't a speedy deletion of the article anyway. Thanks for the information. [[User:Omotorwayo|Omotorwayo]] 13:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

539615 +++$+++ Koal4e +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539615 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-31 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.249100100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Koal4e|Koal4e]] ([[User talk:Koal4e|talk]]) 21:15, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
539616 +++$+++ Koal4e +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539615 +++$+++ 539615 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.249103220E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Koal4e|Koal4e]] ([[User talk:Koal4e|talk]]) 22:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

277481 +++$+++ Taprobanus +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277481 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-11 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.184198640E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your etireless effort in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Sri_Lanka_Reconciliation|Sri lanka reconciliation]] related tasks  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your etireless effort in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Sri_Lanka_Reconciliation|Sri lanka reconciliation]] related tasks [[User:Taprobanus|Taprobanus]] 17:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
277482 +++$+++ Taprobanus +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277481 +++$+++ 277481 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.184199120E09 +++$+++ You are welcome, really thanks to you for taking that kind of time  +++$+++ :You are welcome, really thanks to you for taking that kind of time [[User:Taprobanus|Taprobanus]] 17:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
277483 +++$+++ Jgassens +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277481 +++$+++ 277481 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.184210940E09 +++$+++ Before I go on to request deletion at Wikicommons, I suppose it is best to work it out here.  The issue is that the image is not an image which has any historical background.  That is to say, the image is made up, perhaps not by you or the original author, but it is a fictitious flag nonetheless.  The \"50 star\" argument suggests that a review of the law post 1959, when there were officially 50 states, shows no incident of that flag ever being officially recognized by the United States.  The current US flag, with 50 stars, was recognized in 1960.  Unless the creators of the \"civil flag\" of Nathaniel Hawthorn's world had foreknowledge that that we would have 50 states, then it is quite impossible that there should be 50 stars.   As the \"owner\" of the image, it is upon you to verify that this is an actual flag of the United States.  I.E. one that has been recognized by the federal legislature.  If you can't do it, then you should concede that it is not a historically relevant artifact. If it is a hoax, it has no place on Wikipedia, as is policy.  +++$+++ :Before I go on to request deletion at Wikicommons, I suppose it is best to work it out here.  The issue is that the image is not an image which has any historical background.  That is to say, the image is made up, perhaps not by you or the original author, but it is a fictitious flag nonetheless.  The "50 star" argument suggests that a review of the law post 1959, when there were officially 50 states, shows no incident of that flag ever being officially recognized by the United States.  The current US flag, with 50 stars, was recognized in 1960.  Unless the creators of the "civil flag" of Nathaniel Hawthorn's world had foreknowledge that that we would have 50 states, then it is quite impossible that there should be 50 stars.   As the "owner" of the image, it is upon you to verify that this is an actual flag of the United States.  I.E. one that has been recognized by the federal legislature.  If you can't do it, then you should concede that it is not a historically relevant artifact. If it is a hoax, it has no place on Wikipedia, as is policy. [[User:Jgassens|Jgassens]] 20:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
277484 +++$+++ Jgassens +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277481 +++$+++ 277481 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.184212920E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your reply.  I will consider your argument, though I still whole-heartedly disagree.  You will be notified regardless.  Most likely I will request deletion, since the article it is attached to is written entirely incorrectly (and should be phrased as a complete hoax and not a controversy, and since it is not a noteworthy hoax, it should be deleted or merged.)  It's a better outcome than a stupid revert war, regardless. :)  +++$+++ :Thank you for your reply.  I will consider your argument, though I still whole-heartedly disagree.  You will be notified regardless.  Most likely I will request deletion, since the article it is attached to is written entirely incorrectly (and should be phrased as a complete hoax and not a controversy, and since it is not a noteworthy hoax, it should be deleted or merged.)  It's a better outcome than a stupid revert war, regardless. :) [[User:Jgassens|Jgassens]] 21:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
277485 +++$+++ Jgassens +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277481 +++$+++ 277484 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.184293920E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but I have requested the image for deletion on wikicommons. [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Commons:Deletion_requests\/2007\/07\/12#Image:Us-civil.svg].  Please understand that it isn't anything personal.  My intentions are for the improvement of wikipedia.  +++$+++ :*I'm sorry, but I have requested the image for deletion on wikicommons. [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/2007/07/12#Image:Us-civil.svg].  Please understand that it isn't anything personal.  My intentions are for the improvement of wikipedia. [[User:Jgassens|Jgassens]] 19:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

15338 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15338 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.310567520E09 +++$+++ Hi Andrzejbanas, I have reviewed your nomination of ''[[Horny House of Horror]]'' and there are a few things lacking. Could you please check my comments at [[T:TDYK]]? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Andrzejbanas, I have reviewed your nomination of ''[[Horny House of Horror]]'' and there are a few things lacking. Could you please check my comments at [[T:TDYK]]? Thanks. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 07:32, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
15339 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15338 +++$+++ 15338 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.310677260E09 +++$+++ I've commented again; you still need to review an article.  +++$+++ :I've commented again; you still need to review an article. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 14:01, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
15340 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15338 +++$+++ 15339 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311665640E09 +++$+++ Still waiting on a quid-pro-quo review.  +++$+++ ::Still waiting on a quid-pro-quo review. [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 00:34, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
15341 +++$+++ Crisco 1492 +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15338 +++$+++ 15340 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311668640E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. If the review is finished before I have to get offline, I'll be glad to approve your nomination; otherwise, I'll try this evening (my time).  +++$+++ :::You're welcome. If the review is finished before I have to get offline, I'll be glad to approve your nomination; otherwise, I'll try this evening (my time). [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 01:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

539629 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539629 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-18 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.250605560E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 07:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
539630 +++$+++ Megistias +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539629 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.250777580E09 +++$+++ Stop removing referenced material. +++$+++ ::Stop removing referenced material.[[User:Megistias|Megistias]] ([[User talk:Megistias|talk]]) 07:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
539631 +++$+++ Megistias +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539629 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.250778420E09 +++$+++ Those are cities founded by ancient Greeks as the refs say.Thracian settlements are to be mentioned with '''proper''' refs. +++$+++ ::Those are cities founded by ancient Greeks as the refs say.Thracian settlements are to be mentioned with '''proper''' refs.[[User:Megistias|Megistias]] ([[User talk:Megistias|talk]]) 07:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
539632 +++$+++ Megistias +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539629 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.250778600E09 +++$+++ Learn how wiki works by reading the rules. +++$+++ ::Learn how wiki works by reading the rules.[[User:Megistias|Megistias]] ([[User talk:Megistias|talk]]) 07:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
539633 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539629 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.250778840E09 +++$+++ Seriously man, chill, double standards are bad. Quite clearly both Apollonia Pontica and Cabyle were Thracian settlements that later fell in the Greek sphere of influence as colonization went. Cabyle was even a Thracian royal city until Philip II conquered it. Have some respect for other contributors, it's not like ''you'''re the one to be teaching me, you know. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ ::: Seriously man, chill, double standards are bad. Quite clearly both Apollonia Pontica and Cabyle were Thracian settlements that later fell in the Greek sphere of influence as colonization went. Cabyle was even a Thracian royal city until Philip II conquered it. Have some respect for other contributors, it's not like ''you'''re the one to be teaching me, you know. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 07:34, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
539634 +++$+++ Megistias +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539629 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 07:38:00 +++$+++ 1.250779080E09 +++$+++ Sources say that Apollonia and Cabyle were founded by the Greeks.Thracian settlements are not considered \"polis\" or cities in general.The ref says that Phillip II ''founded'' the city. +++$+++ ::Sources say that Apollonia and Cabyle were founded by the Greeks.Thracian settlements are not considered "polis" or cities in general.The ref says that Phillip II ''founded'' the city.[[User:Megistias|Megistias]] ([[User talk:Megistias|talk]]) 07:38, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
539635 +++$+++ Megistias +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539629 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.250779200E09 +++$+++ Also [[Parvomay]] looks awful.The external links belong to an external link subsection and those that can be used as refs can be used as refs.And some links are useless images. +++$+++ ::Also [[Parvomay]] looks awful.The external links belong to an external link subsection and those that can be used as refs can be used as refs.And some links are useless images.[[User:Megistias|Megistias]] ([[User talk:Megistias|talk]]) 07:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
539636 +++$+++ Megistias +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539629 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.250779560E09 +++$+++ Also page 893 ,Kabyle ...'''founded or refounded by Phillip II''' +++$+++ ::Also page 893 ,Kabyle ...'''founded or refounded by Phillip II'''[[User:Megistias|Megistias]] ([[User talk:Megistias|talk]]) 07:46, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
539637 +++$+++ Megistias +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539629 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.250779800E09 +++$+++ In general many ancient Greek colonies in Thrace were founded on or close to the sites of Thracian settlements.It doesnt make them thracian but ancient Greek.Greeks founded cities, thracian founded only one city that was a minor and most of the times not considered a polis, Seuthopolis. +++$+++ ::In general many ancient Greek colonies in Thrace were founded on or close to the sites of Thracian settlements.It doesnt make them thracian but ancient Greek.Greeks founded cities, thracian founded only one city that was a minor and most of the times not considered a polis, Seuthopolis.[[User:Megistias|Megistias]] ([[User talk:Megistias|talk]]) 07:50, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
539638 +++$+++ Megistias +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539629 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.250780160E09 +++$+++ You cabyle \"ref\" with the symposium cant even be checked for what it contains.You just write of a symposium; +++$+++ ::You cabyle "ref" with the symposium cant even be checked for what it contains.You just write of a symposium;[[User:Megistias|Megistias]] ([[User talk:Megistias|talk]]) 07:56, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

15343 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-15 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310781600E09 +++$+++ Hello again A. Regarding the list of CC DVD releases I notice that the upcoming release [http:\/\/www.criterion.com\/films\/27751-the-killing] of Kubrick's film The Killing also includes the film he made just before it entitled Killer's Kiss. IMO this is somewhat significant. Now I know that many of their releases, like Mira Nair's Monsoon Wedding, include short films made by the directors in their formative years. While I would not advocate for their mention in the list I am wondering whether KK might not be a special case. It did receive a theatrical release and is considered notable in SK's career - although to be honest Fear and Desire is the only film of his not considered notable :-) If we aren't going to give a full line to it in the list what do you think about including a footnote mentioning it? If you are happy with not mentioning it then that is fine with me. We are having the 50% off CC DVDs at Barnes and Noble again until Aug 1. I wish they would draw my six numbers at the lottery so I could fly you over the border and finance you adding to your collection. Cheers.  +++$+++ Hello again A. Regarding the list of CC DVD releases I notice that the upcoming release [http://www.criterion.com/films/27751-the-killing] of Kubrick's film The Killing also includes the film he made just before it entitled Killer's Kiss. IMO this is somewhat significant. Now I know that many of their releases, like Mira Nair's Monsoon Wedding, include short films made by the directors in their formative years. While I would not advocate for their mention in the list I am wondering whether KK might not be a special case. It did receive a theatrical release and is considered notable in SK's career - although to be honest Fear and Desire is the only film of his not considered notable :-) If we aren't going to give a full line to it in the list what do you think about including a footnote mentioning it? If you are happy with not mentioning it then that is fine with me. We are having the 50% off CC DVDs at Barnes and Noble again until Aug 1. I wish they would draw my six numbers at the lottery so I could fly you over the border and finance you adding to your collection. Cheers. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 19:00, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
15344 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Andrzejbanas +++$+++ 15343 +++$+++ 15343 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.310788680E09 +++$+++ Different pages is definitely a good idea. I would even like to see the main list split every 100 titles or so because I forget what they different color codes and symbols are for and have to scroll all the way back up to refresh my memory. I know that would mess up the sorting - though I wonder if we could just recommend to any reader that wants to do various sortins to go to the CCs website as it is sortable in the same way that our table is. If you want to start a thread at the talk page I would be happy to contribute. I would recommend putting a link to it at the film project talk page. Thanks for your reply and have a nice weekend.  +++$+++ :Different pages is definitely a good idea. I would even like to see the main list split every 100 titles or so because I forget what they different color codes and symbols are for and have to scroll all the way back up to refresh my memory. I know that would mess up the sorting - though I wonder if we could just recommend to any reader that wants to do various sortins to go to the CCs website as it is sortable in the same way that our table is. If you want to start a thread at the talk page I would be happy to contribute. I would recommend putting a link to it at the film project talk page. Thanks for your reply and have a nice weekend. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 20:58, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

277488 +++$+++ SEY01 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-16 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.184593260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:SEY01|SEY01]] 06:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
277489 +++$+++ Nightstallion +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277488 +++$+++ 277488 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.184619420E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid all of that's absolutely irrelevant as long as you can't [[WP:CITE]] a reliable source which states what you've found out, period. \u2014 +++$+++ :I'm afraid all of that's absolutely irrelevant as long as you can't [[WP:CITE]] a reliable source which states what you've found out, period. —[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightstallion</span>]] 13:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

277490 +++$+++ SEY01 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-16 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.184620620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:SEY01|SEY01]] 14:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
277491 +++$+++ Nightstallion +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277490 +++$+++ 277490 +++$+++ 2007-07-17 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.184685600E09 +++$+++ I have understood it, thank you -- regardless of whether what you claim as the source of the flag is accurate or not (might be ''shrugs''), '''you need an independent source which you can cite'''. Simply figuring something out for yourself is quite nice, but not good enough on Wikipedia. I'm afraid I'm getting the impression that you fail to understand what this discussion is about; your claims regarding Lexicon's lack of Turkishness being a factor in this seem to indicate you don't understand the issue. \u2014 +++$+++ :I have understood it, thank you -- regardless of whether what you claim as the source of the flag is accurate or not (might be ''shrugs''), '''you need an independent source which you can cite'''. Simply figuring something out for yourself is quite nice, but not good enough on Wikipedia. I'm afraid I'm getting the impression that you fail to understand what this discussion is about; your claims regarding Lexicon's lack of Turkishness being a factor in this seem to indicate you don't understand the issue. —[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightstallion</span>]] 08:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

264702 +++$+++ Ikip +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-02 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.254544320E09 +++$+++ The JPS, I stumbled on your current project because you were notifying other editors[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AA_Man_In_Black&diff=317509265&oldid=315843058] How many other editors you have contacted? I am very troubled by the non-neutral words you use. \"fair use = open-season for polluting our free encyclopedia with this.\" I would strongly suggest you get wider consensus before you dictate what should or should not be on wikipedia.  +++$+++ The JPS, I stumbled on your current project because you were notifying other editors[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AA_Man_In_Black&diff=317509265&oldid=315843058] How many other editors you have contacted? I am very troubled by the non-neutral words you use. "fair use = open-season for polluting our free encyclopedia with this." I would strongly suggest you get wider consensus before you dictate what should or should not be on wikipedia. [[User:Ikip|Ikip]] ([[User talk:Ikip|talk]]) 21:32, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
264703 +++$+++ JeremyWJ +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264702 +++$+++ 264702 +++$+++ 2009-10-02 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.254547020E09 +++$+++ I will second that.  +++$+++ :I will second that. [[User:JeremyWJ|JeremyWJ]] ([[User talk:JeremyWJ|talk]]) 22:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
264704 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264702 +++$+++ 264703 +++$+++ 2009-10-02 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.254549420E09 +++$+++ Consensus ''has'' been reached. [[Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Non-free_image_use_in_galleries|This]] is clear. Guidelines are established, worded and updated after extended discussion. A couple of discussions, such as those to which Neutralhomer helpfully linked, cannot override guidelines. There is no harm in notifying other editors; this is not RfC, AFD, RFA, etc.  +++$+++ ::Consensus ''has'' been reached. [[Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Non-free_image_use_in_galleries|This]] is clear. Guidelines are established, worded and updated after extended discussion. A couple of discussions, such as those to which Neutralhomer helpfully linked, cannot override guidelines. There is no harm in notifying other editors; this is not RfC, AFD, RFA, etc. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:57, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
264705 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264702 +++$+++ 264703 +++$+++ 2009-10-02 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.254549540E09 +++$+++ Jeremy, why did you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJeremyWJ&diff=317510539&oldid=317507860 remove] my note from your talk page? In an edit summary you request it to be discussed, yet you have only contributed four words and a few reversions.  +++$+++ ::Jeremy, why did you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJeremyWJ&diff=317510539&oldid=317507860 remove] my note from your talk page? In an edit summary you request it to be discussed, yet you have only contributed four words and a few reversions. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
264706 +++$+++ Sesu Prime +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264702 +++$+++ 264705 +++$+++ 2009-10-03 05:16:00 +++$+++ 1.254572160E09 +++$+++ Hey JPS, just letting you know [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In Black]] is no longer active on Wikipedia. Cheers. - +++$+++ :::Hey JPS, just letting you know [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In Black]] is no longer active on Wikipedia. Cheers. -[[User:Sesu Prime|'''<font color="#0000cd">sesu</font>''']][[User talk:Sesu Prime|'''<font color="#b22222">PRIME</font>''']] 05:16, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
264707 +++$+++ Redvers +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264702 +++$+++ 264706 +++$+++ 2009-10-04 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.254691680E09 +++$+++ For the record, I agree with every word The JPS has to say on this subject. He's 100% in the right about this. \u21aa<span style=\"font-family:georgia;\">'''[[User talk:Redvers|REDVERS]]''' <small><small><sup><u> +++$+++ ::::For the record, I agree with every word The JPS has to say on this subject. He's 100% in the right about this. ↪<span style="font-family:georgia;">'''[[User talk:Redvers|REDVERS]]''' <small><small><sup><u>[[User:Redvers/Say no to Commons|I dreamt about stew last night]]</u></sup></small></small></span> 14:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

277495 +++$+++ Kubura +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-19 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.184878200E09 +++$+++ Latin was in the official use till the last dekades of Republic of Dubrovnik. In a book I have, I see that a diplomat was appointed with a document written in Latin.  +++$+++ Latin was in the official use till the last dekades of Republic of Dubrovnik. In a book I have, I see that a diplomat was appointed with a document written in Latin. [[User:Kubura|Kubura]] 13:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
277496 +++$+++ Zenanarh +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277495 +++$+++ 277495 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.184879820E09 +++$+++ For Medieval - period you can say that official language was the one which was in usage by the citizens of the specific city. In Dubrovnik\/Ragusa it was Croatian and Dalmatian. Do you know that the most part of Croatian Medieval cultural ancestry comes from coastal cities like Dubrovnik, Split, Trogir and Zadar?  +++$+++ :For Medieval - period you can say that official language was the one which was in usage by the citizens of the specific city. In Dubrovnik/Ragusa it was Croatian and Dalmatian. Do you know that the most part of Croatian Medieval cultural ancestry comes from coastal cities like Dubrovnik, Split, Trogir and Zadar? [[User:Zenanarh|Zenanarh]] 14:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
277497 +++$+++ Kubura +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277495 +++$+++ 277496 +++$+++ 2007-07-20 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.184955960E09 +++$+++ I agree with that remark. Maybe it's better description \"administrative\".  +++$+++ ::I agree with that remark. Maybe it's better description "administrative". [[User:Kubura|Kubura]] 11:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

15352 +++$+++ Leahtwosaints +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15352 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 09:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311264840E09 +++$+++ It's just a bout of [[cellulitis]] that has been dogging me since I came home from the hospital on June 4th for an entirely different issue, but then, you know how it's easier to pick up bacteria in such places. But I assume you dropped by my talk page for a different reason. If you can recall what it was, please let me know! I have been uploading a whole bunch of photos, BTW. :) Oh, but if you can respond on my talk page, it would be very kind of you! -- +++$+++ It's just a bout of [[cellulitis]] that has been dogging me since I came home from the hospital on June 4th for an entirely different issue, but then, you know how it's easier to pick up bacteria in such places. But I assume you dropped by my talk page for a different reason. If you can recall what it was, please let me know! I have been uploading a whole bunch of photos, BTW. :) Oh, but if you can respond on my talk page, it would be very kind of you! --[[User:Leahtwosaints|Leahtwosaints]] ([[User talk:Leahtwosaints|talk]]) 09:14, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
15353 +++$+++ Leahtwosaints +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15352 +++$+++ 15352 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311328320E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you remembered! There are several musicians who haven't really gotten the attention (especially that of a careful biographer like yourself) that they deserve. Depending on your tastes, [[Rory Gallagher]], [[Jeff Beck]] (in his myriad incarnations), [[Mick Taylor]], [[Mark Knopfler]]. and several others always need some help. Hope you had a good rest after that huge job on [[Van Morrison]]! -- +++$+++ : I'm glad you remembered! There are several musicians who haven't really gotten the attention (especially that of a careful biographer like yourself) that they deserve. Depending on your tastes, [[Rory Gallagher]], [[Jeff Beck]] (in his myriad incarnations), [[Mick Taylor]], [[Mark Knopfler]]. and several others always need some help. Hope you had a good rest after that huge job on [[Van Morrison]]! --[[User:Leahtwosaints|Leahtwosaints]] ([[User talk:Leahtwosaints|talk]]) 02:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

277498 +++$+++ Kubura +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-19 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.184878320E09 +++$+++ Lexicon, always discuss with others, when you make changes in the article that had severe editwars, disputes etc..  +++$+++ Lexicon, always discuss with others, when you make changes in the article that had severe editwars, disputes etc.. [[User:Kubura|Kubura]] 13:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
277499 +++$+++ DIREKTOR +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277498 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.184898600E09 +++$+++ \"I have a questions\", this can be only one BANNED person...  +++$+++ :: "I have a questions", this can be only one BANNED person... [[User:DIREKTOR|DIREKTOR]] 19:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

526847 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526847 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-17 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.192649760E09 +++$+++ All the best,  +++$+++ All the best, [[User:EyeSerene|<font color="RoyalBlue">EyeSerene</font>]]''<sup><small>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<font color="OliveDrab">TALK</font>]]</small></sup>'' 12:36, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
526848 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526847 +++$+++ 526847 +++$+++ 2007-10-19 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.192820460E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the work you have put in on this one as well. I have now passed the GA reassessment. All the best,  +++$+++ :Thank you for the work you have put in on this one as well. I have now passed the GA reassessment. All the best, [[User:EyeSerene|<font color="RoyalBlue">EyeSerene</font>]]''<sup><small>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<font color="OliveDrab">TALK</font>]]</small></sup>'' 12:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

15356 +++$+++ Aprock +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.312346580E09 +++$+++ There is a new discussion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Coin#Web_Sheriff] on Wikipedia:Conflict of interest\/Noticeboard regarding your relationship with [[Web Sheriff]].  +++$+++ There is a new discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Coin#Web_Sheriff] on Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding your relationship with [[Web Sheriff]]. [[User:Aprock|aprock]] ([[User talk:Aprock|talk]]) 21:43, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
15357 +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15356 +++$+++ 15356 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.312354380E09 +++$+++ Well, I have no relationship with Web Sheriff and you should be censored for your actions and for your complete disregard of [[WP:AGF]]. I think you have some kind of personal agenda agianst me or Web Sheriff. This is only now after your actions today. Yesterday, I did assume good faith when you removed material that was not contentious form the article. I thought maybe you were indeed acting in good faith and that you were trying to be helpful for WP. Today, I have a different opinion. You seem to be out to get me or else a grudge against Web Sheriff in the process. What else could i think? The NPOV edit board had not discussed this much and it was up for a decision. I was thinking I should not edit much until something more was discussed on other edtor's decisions, but you seem to not be concerned about that. How can you not feel like you shoul show respect for the process or for me as a long time editor in good standing. I've never had any encounter with you before, so why so personal against me? No answer needed, you obviously have a problem with me or the article that I have dared to edit.  +++$+++ :Well, I have no relationship with Web Sheriff and you should be censored for your actions and for your complete disregard of [[WP:AGF]]. I think you have some kind of personal agenda agianst me or Web Sheriff. This is only now after your actions today. Yesterday, I did assume good faith when you removed material that was not contentious form the article. I thought maybe you were indeed acting in good faith and that you were trying to be helpful for WP. Today, I have a different opinion. You seem to be out to get me or else a grudge against Web Sheriff in the process. What else could i think? The NPOV edit board had not discussed this much and it was up for a decision. I was thinking I should not edit much until something more was discussed on other edtor's decisions, but you seem to not be concerned about that. How can you not feel like you shoul show respect for the process or for me as a long time editor in good standing. I've never had any encounter with you before, so why so personal against me? No answer needed, you obviously have a problem with me or the article that I have dared to edit. [[User:Agadant|Agadant]] ([[User talk:Agadant#top|talk]]) 23:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
15358 +++$+++ Aprock +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15356 +++$+++ 15357 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.312354620E09 +++$+++ Thank you for clarifying that you have no relationship with Web Sheriff.   +++$+++ ::Thank you for clarifying that you have no relationship with Web Sheriff.  [[User:Aprock|aprock]] ([[User talk:Aprock|talk]]) 23:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
15359 +++$+++ Aprock +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15356 +++$+++ 15358 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.312355100E09 +++$+++ Any time you're ready to discuss the content issues raised on the talk page, we can begin working together to improve the article.  Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Any time you're ready to discuss the content issues raised on the talk page, we can begin working together to improve the article.  Cheers, [[User:Aprock|aprock]] ([[User talk:Aprock|talk]]) 00:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
15360 +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15356 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312431840E09 +++$+++ Ok, I do have many issues, Aprock... there was much material removed that could not in any stretch of the imagination be suspect and would never be questioned in a fair process. I have been an editor on here 5 years and have seen a lot although I have kept to myself, because that is my nature mostly. ?So I was completely undefended but if I had in truth been COI or in any way connected I would have built a network of cronies to back me because I would have known I was doing something wrong and might need them.  Huh?  +++$+++ :::::Ok, I do have many issues, Aprock... there was much material removed that could not in any stretch of the imagination be suspect and would never be questioned in a fair process. I have been an editor on here 5 years and have seen a lot although I have kept to myself, because that is my nature mostly. ?So I was completely undefended but if I had in truth been COI or in any way connected I would have built a network of cronies to back me because I would have known I was doing something wrong and might need them.  Huh? [[User:Agadant|Agadant]] ([[User talk:Agadant#top|talk]]) 21:24, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

15362 +++$+++ Cameron Scott +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15362 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.312570980E09 +++$+++ ''this company is client based every right to put company information on type of clients'' - no idea what this is about, please read the manual of style, we aren't here to protect the 'rights' of companies, we are here to write NPOV articles that are suitable for an encyclopedia. Your constant WP:OWNERSHIP of this article has been commented on by a number of people and if you persist in trying to stop clean-up of the article, I'll start a move to have you topic-banned. -- +++$+++ ''this company is client based every right to put company information on type of clients'' - no idea what this is about, please read the manual of style, we aren't here to protect the 'rights' of companies, we are here to write NPOV articles that are suitable for an encyclopedia. Your constant WP:OWNERSHIP of this article has been commented on by a number of people and if you persist in trying to stop clean-up of the article, I'll start a move to have you topic-banned. --[[User:Cameron Scott|Cameron Scott]] ([[User talk:Cameron Scott|talk]]) 12:03, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
15363 +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15362 +++$+++ 15362 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312571400E09 +++$+++ The editing has become POV and so limited in scope, I am sick, I did not have ablility to  write description properly. I don't know what to say anymore, this should all be discussed on talk page before anymore removal. If experienced editors can edit this without discussion than why was Luisarfs allowed to remove huge chunks without revert except for me . His history shows only Web Sheriff deletions, etc. and competitive company contributions. +++$+++ :The editing has become POV and so limited in scope, I am sick, I did not have ablility to  write description properly. I don't know what to say anymore, this should all be discussed on talk page before anymore removal. If experienced editors can edit this without discussion than why was Luisarfs allowed to remove huge chunks without revert except for me . His history shows only Web Sheriff deletions, etc. and competitive company contributions.[[User:Agadant|Agadant]] ([[User talk:Agadant#top|talk]]) 12:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
15364 +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15362 +++$+++ 15363 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312572060E09 +++$+++ For GS, I left out the pronoun \"I\" and you call it ownership. I have become physically ill from this assault on my character and my well-soucced editing on a controvsial topic. I am not allowed to edit without someone immediately showing up to attack my edit or words used. Undue pressure that not many could withstand but I will believe in fairness and equality and even this incident of multiple editors always against me and my writing will not change that. +++$+++ ::For GS, I left out the pronoun "I" and you call it ownership. I have become physically ill from this assault on my character and my well-soucced editing on a controvsial topic. I am not allowed to edit without someone immediately showing up to attack my edit or words used. Undue pressure that not many could withstand but I will believe in fairness and equality and even this incident of multiple editors always against me and my writing will not change that.[[User:Agadant|Agadant]] ([[User talk:Agadant#top|talk]]) 12:21, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

439467 +++$+++ Kaarel +++$+++ Kku +++$+++ 439467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-20 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.142905320E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just noticed your adding the links [[Ventral nerve cord]], [[Insect nervous system]] and [[nerve cord]] etc to articles. I wonder if you are intending to write those articles, or else what's the use of it? I mean, sometimes the titles of non-existing articles are not as foreseeable as it seems (someone else can create just as easily an article named ''Nervous system (insects)'' or ''Nervous system of insects''!)  +++$+++ Hi, I just noticed your adding the links [[Ventral nerve cord]], [[Insect nervous system]] and [[nerve cord]] etc to articles. I wonder if you are intending to write those articles, or else what's the use of it? I mean, sometimes the titles of non-existing articles are not as foreseeable as it seems (someone else can create just as easily an article named ''Nervous system (insects)'' or ''Nervous system of insects''!) [[User:Kaarel|Kaarel]] 17:42, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
439468 +++$+++ Kku +++$+++ Kku +++$+++ 439467 +++$+++ 439467 +++$+++ 2006-03-20 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.142905740E09 +++$+++ some, few articles. and, lo and behold, i started the first one already. i do not really see a reason to complain about those other as yet non-existent articles here; instead, one could and should feel positively flabbergasted that nobody thought about the possible relevance of arthropod neurobiology up to now - don't you think so? oh, and as for n.s. (insects), etc.: they didn't either. --  +++$+++ :some, few articles. and, lo and behold, i started the first one already. i do not really see a reason to complain about those other as yet non-existent articles here; instead, one could and should feel positively flabbergasted that nobody thought about the possible relevance of arthropod neurobiology up to now - don't you think so? oh, and as for n.s. (insects), etc.: they didn't either. -- [[User:Kku|Kku]] 17:49, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
439469 +++$+++ Kaarel +++$+++ Kku +++$+++ 439467 +++$+++ 439468 +++$+++ 2006-03-20 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.142906940E09 +++$+++ I certainly agree that the articles on insect nervous system (and animal anatomy in general) are still scarce and deficient in Wikipedia - and I warmly welcome them.  +++$+++ ::I certainly agree that the articles on insect nervous system (and animal anatomy in general) are still scarce and deficient in Wikipedia - and I warmly welcome them. [[User:Kaarel|Kaarel]] 18:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

15365 +++$+++ Cameron Scott +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15365 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.312572300E09 +++$+++ So if multiple independent editors become aware of an article and they think it had a problem and they edit it accordingly - they are \"always against me\" - do you not think that should be an alarm bell in your head (that you have WP:OWN problems with that article) ? That you think we are out to get you? -- +++$+++ So if multiple independent editors become aware of an article and they think it had a problem and they edit it accordingly - they are "always against me" - do you not think that should be an alarm bell in your head (that you have WP:OWN problems with that article) ? That you think we are out to get you? --[[User:Cameron Scott|Cameron Scott]] ([[User talk:Cameron Scott|talk]]) 12:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
15366 +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15365 +++$+++ 15365 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.312572420E09 +++$+++ Luisarfs was not reverted. He would have been if this was fair by the independent editors. Look at Luisarfs history and tell me if he qualifies as an experienced editor ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Lu%C3%ADsarfs Luisarfs contributions history]) who can delete content in this editing that is only by experienced editors and tell me why he was not reverted by anyone but then my words and editing are immediately criticized and taken apart.   +++$+++ :Luisarfs was not reverted. He would have been if this was fair by the independent editors. Look at Luisarfs history and tell me if he qualifies as an experienced editor ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lu%C3%ADsarfs Luisarfs contributions history]) who can delete content in this editing that is only by experienced editors and tell me why he was not reverted by anyone but then my words and editing are immediately criticized and taken apart.  [[User:Agadant|Agadant]] ([[User talk:Agadant#top|talk]]) 12:27, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
15367 +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15365 +++$+++ 15366 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.312578900E09 +++$+++ And BTW, the so-called by Luisarfs  \"Indiscriminate\" and not date ordered or properly titled information was not the result of my placement or titling. Although, it was my edits that were sorted but I can't really be responsible anymore for proper sourcing and titling and placement as multiple editors have been moving swiftly to delete and move around what little is left from months of carefully placed, reliably sourced material.  +++$+++ ::And BTW, the so-called by Luisarfs  "Indiscriminate" and not date ordered or properly titled information was not the result of my placement or titling. Although, it was my edits that were sorted but I can't really be responsible anymore for proper sourcing and titling and placement as multiple editors have been moving swiftly to delete and move around what little is left from months of carefully placed, reliably sourced material. [[User:Agadant|Agadant]] ([[User talk:Agadant#top|talk]]) 14:15, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

539654 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539654 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-04 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.254652320E09 +++$+++ How are you, my good man? This past summer, I first set foot on Bulgarian soil - both in the Southern Dobruja stolen from Romania in 1940 (heh) and in Varna. Anyway, this article I link to is quite like some you have written (I say that as a compliment), and it's also up for DYK - shortly below [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_October_3|this line]]. I wouldn't mind a nice \"length, date verified; offline reference accepted on good faith\" (if indeed you accept), and do let me know next time you have something that needs checking. (By the way, if you don't see the elusive rooster, neither do I, unless it's supposed to be the knob on the cross. Maybe it's in the back, but the ''source'' does say it ([[WP:V|verifiability, not truth]]), and it's a very high-quality source - two thick, priceless volumes on every single church, synagogue and mosque in Bucharest, past and present.) -  +++$+++ How are you, my good man? This past summer, I first set foot on Bulgarian soil - both in the Southern Dobruja stolen from Romania in 1940 (heh) and in Varna. Anyway, this article I link to is quite like some you have written (I say that as a compliment), and it's also up for DYK - shortly below [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_October_3|this line]]. I wouldn't mind a nice "length, date verified; offline reference accepted on good faith" (if indeed you accept), and do let me know next time you have something that needs checking. (By the way, if you don't see the elusive rooster, neither do I, unless it's supposed to be the knob on the cross. Maybe it's in the back, but the ''source'' does say it ([[WP:V|verifiability, not truth]]), and it's a very high-quality source - two thick, priceless volumes on every single church, synagogue and mosque in Bucharest, past and present.) - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 03:32, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
539655 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539654 +++$+++ 539654 +++$+++ 2009-10-07 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.254960120E09 +++$+++ As for DYK verification: well, yes, I imagine many people skip over hooks not related to US\/UK\/Western Europe. So it's good to have our own network of verifiers, and feel free to let me know if you need something. Best,  +++$+++ :As for DYK verification: well, yes, I imagine many people skip over hooks not related to US/UK/Western Europe. So it's good to have our own network of verifiers, and feel free to let me know if you need something. Best, [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 17:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

532983 +++$+++ 71.72.65.241 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-29 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.196409420E09 +++$+++ Also, falsely calling clearing out old junk vandalism is against the rules at Wikipedia. I don't know which one, but I'm sure it's one of them. [[Special:Contributions\/71.72.65.241|71.72.65.241]] ( +++$+++ Also, falsely calling clearing out old junk vandalism is against the rules at Wikipedia. I don't know which one, but I'm sure it's one of them. [[Special:Contributions/71.72.65.241|71.72.65.241]] ([[User talk:71.72.65.241|talk]]) 23:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
532984 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532983 +++$+++ 532983 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.196416920E09 +++$+++ In turn, persisting with [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] is against policy. I've protected [[Talk:Slovenia]] for a week. <strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ :In turn, persisting with [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] is against policy. I've protected [[Talk:Slovenia]] for a week. <strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 02:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
532985 +++$+++ 83.16.85.237 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532983 +++$+++ 532984 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.196423760E09 +++$+++ What the hell are you talking about? [[Special:Contributions\/83.16.85.237|83.16.85.237]] ( +++$+++ ::What the hell are you talking about? [[Special:Contributions/83.16.85.237|83.16.85.237]] ([[User talk:83.16.85.237|talk]]) 03:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

15368 +++$+++ Leahtwosaints +++$+++ Agadant +++$+++ 15368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-06 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.312634640E09 +++$+++ Personally, I would like to see the first four I mentioned being developed the most--  your choices, though! -- +++$+++ Personally, I would like to see the first four I mentioned being developed the most--  your choices, though! --[[User:Leahtwosaints|Leahtwosaints]] ([[User talk:Leahtwosaints|talk]]) 05:44, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
15369 +++$+++ Wjemather +++$+++ Wjemather +++$+++ 15368 +++$+++ 15368 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.310751660E09 +++$+++ Checked my contributions & can't for the life of me find where I may have made any such edit in that article. You will have to provide a diff (or date\/time when edit was made). <sub><font color=\"#007700\"> +++$+++ :Checked my contributions & can't for the life of me find where I may have made any such edit in that article. You will have to provide a diff (or date/time when edit was made). <sub><font color="#007700">[[User:Wjemather|wjemather]]</font></sub><sup><font color="#ff8040">[[User talk:Wjemather|bigissue]]</font></sup> 10:41, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

539657 +++$+++ Monshuai +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-09 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.255144740E09 +++$+++ Idvam tuk da se zapoznaia s teb zashtoto chustvam che si edin ot zashtitelite na Bulgarskata natsia\/istoria protiv subektivisma i predrasudatsite koito sushtestvuvat sreshto nea i funktsionirat da razrushat neinata identichnost i dostoinstvo. Mojesh li da prochetesh tazi beseda ( http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:John_Vincent_Atanasoff ). Ima niakolko editors koito nerazreshavat pravilni promiani v statiata zashtoto imat negativni chustva kum men. Vsushtnost, v poslednite komentari se razbra che makar i niakoi ot neshtata koito sum kazal za John Atanasoff sa viarni, prosto zashtoto moiat stil na sporene e nepriaten drugite niama da priemat obektivni promiani v statiata. S drugi dumi, za da specheliat sreshto men (chovek koito ne im dopada) niama da razreshat Atanasoff da bude predstaven kato Bulgarian-American, i niama da se kazva che e purviat Amerikanets ot Bulgarski proizhod da se izdinge of nauchno-tehnologichnite sferi na America. Ne se samo che ne moralno, no tova sa sushto i dvoini standarti. Prosto niamam dumi. Znam che agresivno argumentiram i che tova ne e priatno za niakoi hora, no ne moga da priema che tova koeto drugi konstatirat kato ne pravilno povedenie na edin chovek oznachava che Atanasoff niama da bude predstaven po tochen nachin. Ako imash vreme te pomolvan da prochetesh vsichko koeto e napisano v besedata za da si napulno zapoznat sus situatsiata. Ako imash vuzmojnosta da si kajesh mnenieto i da pomognesh shte ti buda blagodaren. Mersi i do chuvane.-- +++$+++ Idvam tuk da se zapoznaia s teb zashtoto chustvam che si edin ot zashtitelite na Bulgarskata natsia/istoria protiv subektivisma i predrasudatsite koito sushtestvuvat sreshto nea i funktsionirat da razrushat neinata identichnost i dostoinstvo. Mojesh li da prochetesh tazi beseda ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_Vincent_Atanasoff ). Ima niakolko editors koito nerazreshavat pravilni promiani v statiata zashtoto imat negativni chustva kum men. Vsushtnost, v poslednite komentari se razbra che makar i niakoi ot neshtata koito sum kazal za John Atanasoff sa viarni, prosto zashtoto moiat stil na sporene e nepriaten drugite niama da priemat obektivni promiani v statiata. S drugi dumi, za da specheliat sreshto men (chovek koito ne im dopada) niama da razreshat Atanasoff da bude predstaven kato Bulgarian-American, i niama da se kazva che e purviat Amerikanets ot Bulgarski proizhod da se izdinge of nauchno-tehnologichnite sferi na America. Ne se samo che ne moralno, no tova sa sushto i dvoini standarti. Prosto niamam dumi. Znam che agresivno argumentiram i che tova ne e priatno za niakoi hora, no ne moga da priema che tova koeto drugi konstatirat kato ne pravilno povedenie na edin chovek oznachava che Atanasoff niama da bude predstaven po tochen nachin. Ako imash vreme te pomolvan da prochetesh vsichko koeto e napisano v besedata za da si napulno zapoznat sus situatsiata. Ako imash vuzmojnosta da si kajesh mnenieto i da pomognesh shte ti buda blagodaren. Mersi i do chuvane.--[[User:Monshuai|Monshuai]] ([[User talk:Monshuai|talk]]) 20:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
539658 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ 2009-10-10 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.255238160E09 +++$+++ As explained on the Atanasoff talk page, the operative guideline states that a biographical subject's ethnicity should not be emphasized in the lead unless it is important to the subject's notability.  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(biographies)#Opening_paragraph]  ''American'' is a nationality for Atanasoff whereas ''Bulgarian American'' is an ethnicity.  Cheers,  +++$+++ :As explained on the Atanasoff talk page, the operative guideline states that a biographical subject's ethnicity should not be emphasized in the lead unless it is important to the subject's notability.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(biographies)#Opening_paragraph]  ''American'' is a nationality for Atanasoff whereas ''Bulgarian American'' is an ethnicity.  Cheers, [[User:Robert K S|Robert&nbsp;K&nbsp;S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 22:16, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
539659 +++$+++ Janelle4elle +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ 539658 +++$+++ 2009-10-11 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.255244400E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately Robert K S is as Monshuai puts doing every he can to keep the words Bulgarian American (B-A) out of the article. Atanasoff is the first B-A to invent a world changing invention. Monshuai is 100% correct.-- +++$+++ ::Unfortunately Robert K S is as Monshuai puts doing every he can to keep the words Bulgarian American (B-A) out of the article. Atanasoff is the first B-A to invent a world changing invention. Monshuai is 100% correct.--[[User:Janelle4elle|Janelle4elle]] ([[User talk:Janelle4elle|talk]]) 00:00, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
539660 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ 539658 +++$+++ 2009-10-11 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.255283640E09 +++$+++ I believe his ethnicity is very important and should be emphasized in the lead. Needless to say, it is his origin beside his invention that has made him so well-known in Bulgaria. Bulgarians identify with him. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ :: I believe his ethnicity is very important and should be emphasized in the lead. Needless to say, it is his origin beside his invention that has made him so well-known in Bulgaria. Bulgarians identify with him. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 10:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
539661 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ 539660 +++$+++ 2009-10-11 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.255309200E09 +++$+++ Bulgarians identify with him, but it is not this fact for which he is notable.  It is the reverse.  Bulgarians identify with him because he is notable.  +++$+++ :::Bulgarians identify with him, but it is not this fact for which he is notable.  It is the reverse.  Bulgarians identify with him because he is notable. [[User:Robert K S|Robert&nbsp;K&nbsp;S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 18:00, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
539662 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ 539661 +++$+++ 2009-10-11 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.255310940E09 +++$+++ A person is not necessarily notable for one thing. From my perspective, he owes a major part of his notability to his descent. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ :::: A person is not necessarily notable for one thing. From my perspective, he owes a major part of his notability to his descent. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 18:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
539663 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ 539662 +++$+++ 2009-10-11 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.255314480E09 +++$+++ Even from your perspective, i.e., the Bulgarian perspective, it is not his descent ''per se'' that makes him notable.  It is his status as claimant to the first digital electronic computer.  His ethnicity may be a point of pride, but it is not germane to notability.  Monshuai has repeatedly argued for fairness in standards across articles.  Imagine if everything else about Atanasoff were the same except for his Bulgarian ethnicity.  Imagine if he had been born in the U.S. to a Turk or Greek or Serb instead.  Would you still take the same position of insistence that his ethnicity was relevant to his notability?  Or would you see him for what he was--a physicist and computer inventor whose accomplishments had little or nothing to do with the incidental country of his father's origin?  Would it not then be improper to give undue weight to his ethnicity?  Of course, the other problem here is that Atanasoff is not solely Bulgarian-American.  He's also whatever other ethnicities contributed by his mother (probably some English, judging by the surname Purdy).  Is it fully honest and fair to name one ethnicity in absence of the others?  +++$+++ :::::Even from your perspective, i.e., the Bulgarian perspective, it is not his descent ''per se'' that makes him notable.  It is his status as claimant to the first digital electronic computer.  His ethnicity may be a point of pride, but it is not germane to notability.  Monshuai has repeatedly argued for fairness in standards across articles.  Imagine if everything else about Atanasoff were the same except for his Bulgarian ethnicity.  Imagine if he had been born in the U.S. to a Turk or Greek or Serb instead.  Would you still take the same position of insistence that his ethnicity was relevant to his notability?  Or would you see him for what he was--a physicist and computer inventor whose accomplishments had little or nothing to do with the incidental country of his father's origin?  Would it not then be improper to give undue weight to his ethnicity?  Of course, the other problem here is that Atanasoff is not solely Bulgarian-American.  He's also whatever other ethnicities contributed by his mother (probably some English, judging by the surname Purdy).  Is it fully honest and fair to name one ethnicity in absence of the others? [[User:Robert K S|Robert&nbsp;K&nbsp;S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 19:28, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
539664 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-11 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.255317840E09 +++$+++ All of those things are more notable than his ethnicity, because those are the things ''for which he is noted''.   At least you have acquiesced that it is national pride that is (improperly) motivating the inclusion of the ethnicity.  +++$+++ :::::::All of those things are more notable than his ethnicity, because those are the things ''for which he is noted''.   At least you have acquiesced that it is national pride that is (improperly) motivating the inclusion of the ethnicity. [[User:Robert K S|Robert&nbsp;K&nbsp;S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 20:24, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
539665 +++$+++ Monshuai +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-11 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.255325700E09 +++$+++ Todor Bozhinov has made good points and his assessment of the situation as an experienced Wikipedian is quite clear. He has acquiesced that \"your desire to remove [the Bulgarian-American] portion is puzzling to say the least.\" This is also the view that others, myself included, have of you as well. In addition, if Atanasoff were as you say born in the US to a \"Turk or Greek or Serb\" we would all respectfully write that in the lead. We're not here to deny ethnicity of any person, nor deny his firsts as an XYZ-American. After all, unlike you, we do not use double standards in assessing what should or should not be in an article.-- +++$+++ ::::::::Todor Bozhinov has made good points and his assessment of the situation as an experienced Wikipedian is quite clear. He has acquiesced that "your desire to remove [the Bulgarian-American] portion is puzzling to say the least." This is also the view that others, myself included, have of you as well. In addition, if Atanasoff were as you say born in the US to a "Turk or Greek or Serb" we would all respectfully write that in the lead. We're not here to deny ethnicity of any person, nor deny his firsts as an XYZ-American. After all, unlike you, we do not use double standards in assessing what should or should not be in an article.--[[User:Monshuai|Monshuai]] ([[User talk:Monshuai|talk]]) 22:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
539666 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-12 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.255399140E09 +++$+++ You confuse \"unbiased factual presentation of biographical material in the encyclopedia, free to the extent possible of ethnic boosterism\" with \"denial of ethnicity\".  I have never denied Atanasoff's ethnicity as a Bulgarian American; I have affirmed it repeatedly.  Instead, I have posited that his ethnicity is not germane to his notability.  Monshuai, you implicitly accept this position by failing to challenge as inherently flawed in its premise the hypothetical wherein Atanasoff is of different ethnicity: if his ethnicity were truly germane to his notability, you must have objected to the hypothetical by saying, \"But Atanasoff could not have been Turkish American or Greek American or Serbian American.  Only a Bulgarian American could have done what Atanasoff did.\"  By recognizing that a man born in the U.S. to a Turk or Greek or Serb could also have invented a computer and testified in a trial and done the other things of note that Atanasoff did, you are affirming that ''his ethnicity wasn't what mattered''--it isn't a central defining characteristic of what makes the man worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia.  There is no double standard in my position here.  ''No'' ethnicity deserves mention as defining for a biographical individual in the article lead, except where the ethnicity is important to notability.  Try just for a moment to put \"Bulgarian pride\" away and see what you're doing the to encyclopedia by pressing this point.  You're turning it more into a vehicle for ethnic boosterism rather than into an unbiased presentation of information.  We don't ''want'' an encyclopedia where every article subject is \"claimed\" to one or more ethnicities (or in the extreme example to numerous ethnicities out of fairness to all the groups who want a claim).  We want a simple presentation that lists the relevant facts first, and gets into the details later in the article.  +++$+++ :::::::::You confuse "unbiased factual presentation of biographical material in the encyclopedia, free to the extent possible of ethnic boosterism" with "denial of ethnicity".  I have never denied Atanasoff's ethnicity as a Bulgarian American; I have affirmed it repeatedly.  Instead, I have posited that his ethnicity is not germane to his notability.  Monshuai, you implicitly accept this position by failing to challenge as inherently flawed in its premise the hypothetical wherein Atanasoff is of different ethnicity: if his ethnicity were truly germane to his notability, you must have objected to the hypothetical by saying, "But Atanasoff could not have been Turkish American or Greek American or Serbian American.  Only a Bulgarian American could have done what Atanasoff did."  By recognizing that a man born in the U.S. to a Turk or Greek or Serb could also have invented a computer and testified in a trial and done the other things of note that Atanasoff did, you are affirming that ''his ethnicity wasn't what mattered''--it isn't a central defining characteristic of what makes the man worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia.  There is no double standard in my position here.  ''No'' ethnicity deserves mention as defining for a biographical individual in the article lead, except where the ethnicity is important to notability.  Try just for a moment to put "Bulgarian pride" away and see what you're doing the to encyclopedia by pressing this point.  You're turning it more into a vehicle for ethnic boosterism rather than into an unbiased presentation of information.  We don't ''want'' an encyclopedia where every article subject is "claimed" to one or more ethnicities (or in the extreme example to numerous ethnicities out of fairness to all the groups who want a claim).  We want a simple presentation that lists the relevant facts first, and gets into the details later in the article. [[User:Robert K S|Robert&nbsp;K&nbsp;S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 18:59, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
539667 +++$+++ Monshuai +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.255434840E09 +++$+++ Robert, your argument is flawed once more. Let me clarify my reason(s) for saying so. Modern numerals (the ones used all over the world) are attributed to various peoples of East Indian and Arabian descent. However, had some other peoples created these numerals (ie: Turks or Greeks or Serbs [or anyone else for that matter]) then they would certainly be attributed to them instead. If you don't agree with both the former and the latter points whilst maintaining that you don't apply double standards, then please go to this article (  http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Arabic_numerals ) and change the lede there. After all, using your logic the modern number system currently used worldwide is not notable for being Hindu-Arabic. It is instead \"only\" notable for making modern mathematics and science possible. It is \"only\" notable for allowing humanity to gain a deeper understanding of its own backyard and of the greater universe. It is \"only\" notable for setting up the foundations that would lead to such wonders as differentials, integrals, algebra, chemistry, experimental physics, etc... Yet we both know that is not the entire story!-- +++$+++ ::::::::::Robert, your argument is flawed once more. Let me clarify my reason(s) for saying so. Modern numerals (the ones used all over the world) are attributed to various peoples of East Indian and Arabian descent. However, had some other peoples created these numerals (ie: Turks or Greeks or Serbs [or anyone else for that matter]) then they would certainly be attributed to them instead. If you don't agree with both the former and the latter points whilst maintaining that you don't apply double standards, then please go to this article (  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_numerals ) and change the lede there. After all, using your logic the modern number system currently used worldwide is not notable for being Hindu-Arabic. It is instead "only" notable for making modern mathematics and science possible. It is "only" notable for allowing humanity to gain a deeper understanding of its own backyard and of the greater universe. It is "only" notable for setting up the foundations that would lead to such wonders as differentials, integrals, algebra, chemistry, experimental physics, etc... Yet we both know that is not the entire story!--[[User:Monshuai|Monshuai]] ([[User talk:Monshuai|talk]]) 04:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
539668 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.255442460E09 +++$+++ You're kidding, right?  Numeral systems aren't biographical subjects and the [[WP:MOSBIO]] guideline doesn't apply.  Numeral systems aren't people and don't have ethnicities.  They're called \"Arabic numerals\" (or \"Hindu-Arabic\" or whatever) to distinguish them from [[Roman numerals]], [[Egyptian numerals]], [[Greek numerals]], or what have you.  And these are the names for these systems, and not ones assigned by Wikipedia.  John Atanasoff's name wasn't \"Bulgarian-American John Atanasoff\".  +++$+++ :::::::::::You're kidding, right?  Numeral systems aren't biographical subjects and the [[WP:MOSBIO]] guideline doesn't apply.  Numeral systems aren't people and don't have ethnicities.  They're called "Arabic numerals" (or "Hindu-Arabic" or whatever) to distinguish them from [[Roman numerals]], [[Egyptian numerals]], [[Greek numerals]], or what have you.  And these are the names for these systems, and not ones assigned by Wikipedia.  John Atanasoff's name wasn't "Bulgarian-American John Atanasoff". [[User:Robert K S|Robert&nbsp;K&nbsp;S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 07:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
539669 +++$+++ Monshuai +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539657 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.255446300E09 +++$+++ No I'm not kidding. The example I showed you demonstrates that what you deem \"not germane to notability\" is included in ledes about all sorts of creations\/inventions\/discoveries. I have also stated that Atanasoff's notability in Bulgaria is due to his being both Bulgarian-American and an inventor of a world changing invention. This notability cannot be discounted by you unless you decide to stereotype an entire country as being \"boosterist\".-- +++$+++ ::::::::::::No I'm not kidding. The example I showed you demonstrates that what you deem "not germane to notability" is included in ledes about all sorts of creations/inventions/discoveries. I have also stated that Atanasoff's notability in Bulgaria is due to his being both Bulgarian-American and an inventor of a world changing invention. This notability cannot be discounted by you unless you decide to stereotype an entire country as being "boosterist".--[[User:Monshuai|Monshuai]] ([[User talk:Monshuai|talk]]) 08:05, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

277517 +++$+++ Watchdogb +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-14 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.187086200E09 +++$+++ Can you also take a look at article [[Vaharai Bombing]] Where citation from [[HRW]] report is taken off and said it is dubious. Just because someone does not agree with what a RS says does not make it UnRS. Please take a look as an edit war is sure to break out. Further can you also take a look at [[Allaipiddy massacre]] article. In the Allaipiddy massacre I used a citation that has been used by HRW itself and some users seem to think it is UnRS. Please can you comment on this article too. Thanks  +++$+++ Can you also take a look at article [[Vaharai Bombing]] Where citation from [[HRW]] report is taken off and said it is dubious. Just because someone does not agree with what a RS says does not make it UnRS. Please take a look as an edit war is sure to break out. Further can you also take a look at [[Allaipiddy massacre]] article. In the Allaipiddy massacre I used a citation that has been used by HRW itself and some users seem to think it is UnRS. Please can you comment on this article too. Thanks [[User:Watchdogb|Watchdogb]] 03:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
277518 +++$+++ Watchdogb +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277517 +++$+++ 277517 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.187149380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for clearing things on the talk page.   +++$+++ :Thanks for clearing things on the talk page.  [[User:Watchdogb|Watchdogb]] 20:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

277519 +++$+++ Vonones +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277519 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-14 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.187123580E09 +++$+++ Hi the anon seems to be the same as this user [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:TimDuncanSupportsTRNC] nationalist editors, seeking propaganda on Wikipedia. His contributions are not helpful. -- +++$+++ Hi the anon seems to be the same as this user [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TimDuncanSupportsTRNC] nationalist editors, seeking propaganda on Wikipedia. His contributions are not helpful. --[[User:Vonones|Vonones]] 13:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
277520 +++$+++ Vonones +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277519 +++$+++ 277519 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.187123700E09 +++$+++ Sock of banned user [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Justice_Forever] that you blocked. -- +++$+++ :Sock of banned user [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Justice_Forever] that you blocked. --[[User:Vonones|Vonones]] 13:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

277522 +++$+++ Watchdogb +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277522 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-21 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.187740620E09 +++$+++ Can you take a look at [[St.Phillip Neri church bombing]] please. I want the article to go through a couple of neutral eyes. Be '''Bold''' and let me know any problems with the article that you might not be able to fix. Thanks  +++$+++ Can you take a look at [[St.Phillip Neri church bombing]] please. I want the article to go through a couple of neutral eyes. Be '''Bold''' and let me know any problems with the article that you might not be able to fix. Thanks [[User:Watchdogb|Watchdogb]] 16:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
277523 +++$+++ Watchdogb +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277522 +++$+++ 277522 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.187745180E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for the clean up of the article. Your work is extremely appreciated. Thanks again  +++$+++ : Thanks a lot for the clean up of the article. Your work is extremely appreciated. Thanks again [[User:Watchdogb|Watchdogb]] 18:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

15379 +++$+++  +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15379 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ ''Perhaps some of the figures could be transferred to an in-line mode, especially those that are hard to read by being too small''. The in-line mode control codes are a bit hard to handle. Any help with the handling of the in-line would be much appreciated. Thank you for your suggestions. Will gradually work to an improved version or versions, but the entry here would also become too long if only in-line were used, and less logically connected; moreover, this new entry is '''the result of an (unwise) previous condensation of two different entries in Wikipedia by other contributors''', '''without my consent, either implicit or explicit.'''[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Bci2 Bci2] 15:17, 12 April 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ ''Perhaps some of the figures could be transferred to an in-line mode, especially those that are hard to read by being too small''. The in-line mode control codes are a bit hard to handle. Any help with the handling of the in-line would be much appreciated. Thank you for your suggestions. Will gradually work to an improved version or versions, but the entry here would also become too long if only in-line were used, and less logically connected; moreover, this new entry is '''the result of an (unwise) previous condensation of two different entries in Wikipedia by other contributors''', '''without my consent, either implicit or explicit.'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bci2 Bci2] 15:17, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
15380 +++$+++ Antony-22 +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15379 +++$+++ 15379 +++$+++ 2010-04-13 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.271213280E09 +++$+++ In this case, I think it would be best to expand your captions into paragraphs and then select the most relevant images to become inline images, moving actual images of DNA to the end, and removing the rest or moving them to other articles.  I really think that the galleries as they currently exist make the article hard to read, and are not in line with the relevant Wikipedia guidelines.  I may start this process soon if I have time, and I'd like to hear your comments on the results.   +++$+++ :In this case, I think it would be best to expand your captions into paragraphs and then select the most relevant images to become inline images, moving actual images of DNA to the end, and removing the rest or moving them to other articles.  I really think that the galleries as they currently exist make the article hard to read, and are not in line with the relevant Wikipedia guidelines.  I may start this process soon if I have time, and I'd like to hear your comments on the results.  [[User:Antony-22|Antony-'''''22''''']] ([[User talk:Antony-22|talk]]) 19:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
15381 +++$+++ Antony-22 +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15379 +++$+++ 15379 +++$+++ 2010-04-14 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.271251200E09 +++$+++ Okay, I've taken a crack at editing it down, let me know what you think.  You mentioned that you find the inline images a bit hard to handle; I agree it can be tricky if you have a lot of images.  [[Wikipedia:Extended image syntax]] and [[Wikipedia:Picture tutorial]] are good resources on how to use the image syntax to your advantage, and one interesting trick is to use [[Template:Multiple image]], which places two images side-by-side.  Hopefully these will be of use to you.   +++$+++ :Okay, I've taken a crack at editing it down, let me know what you think.  You mentioned that you find the inline images a bit hard to handle; I agree it can be tricky if you have a lot of images.  [[Wikipedia:Extended image syntax]] and [[Wikipedia:Picture tutorial]] are good resources on how to use the image syntax to your advantage, and one interesting trick is to use [[Template:Multiple image]], which places two images side-by-side.  Hopefully these will be of use to you.  [[User:Antony-22|Antony-'''''22''''']] ([[User talk:Antony-22|talk]]) 06:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

15382 +++$+++  +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15382 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I know it should be possible but I forget how to recover the previous version of the Talk page of that article.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Bci2 Bci2] 10:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ I know it should be possible but I forget how to recover the previous version of the Talk page of that article.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bci2 Bci2] 10:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
15383 +++$+++  +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15382 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Very much appreciate this link because I should re-instate a few figures needed in the original entry. Am also very impressed with your editing abilities that have significantly improved the readability of this entry for the average Wikipedia reader. Please also note that I have saved the current entry in PDF format as part of a much larger book to which it belongs.  Thanks again for very helpful comments and additions! [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Bci2 Bci2] 18:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ ***Very much appreciate this link because I should re-instate a few figures needed in the original entry. Am also very impressed with your editing abilities that have significantly improved the readability of this entry for the average Wikipedia reader. Please also note that I have saved the current entry in PDF format as part of a much larger book to which it belongs.  Thanks again for very helpful comments and additions! [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bci2 Bci2] 18:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
15384 +++$+++ Antony-22 +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15382 +++$+++ 15382 +++$+++ 2010-04-14 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.271293620E09 +++$+++ Hope these help.   +++$+++ :Hope these help.  [[User:Antony-22|Antony-'''''22''''']] ([[User talk:Antony-22|talk]]) 18:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

539674 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-13 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.255493700E09 +++$+++ [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''{{#if:Thracians|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Thracians]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''.  -- +++$+++ [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''{{#if:Thracians|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Thracians]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''.  --[[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean|talk]]) 21:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
539675 +++$+++ Monshuai +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539674 +++$+++ 539674 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.255512420E09 +++$+++ Zdravei, znaesh li koi sa Bulgarskite administratori? Mersi.-- +++$+++ :Zdravei, znaesh li koi sa Bulgarskite administratori? Mersi.--[[User:Monshuai|Monshuai]] ([[User talk:Monshuai|talk]]) 02:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

15388 +++$+++ Everard Proudfoot +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-12 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.284282660E09 +++$+++ Please don't add names to lists of names unless the articles exist first.  And be sure they meet the requirements of [[WP:RS]]. [[WP:BLP]] and [[WP:BIO]].   +++$+++ Please don't add names to lists of names unless the articles exist first.  And be sure they meet the requirements of [[WP:RS]]. [[WP:BLP]] and [[WP:BIO]].  [[User:Everard Proudfoot|Everard Proudfoot]] ([[User talk:Everard Proudfoot|talk]]) 02:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
15389 +++$+++ Everard Proudfoot +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15388 +++$+++ 15388 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.284282720E09 +++$+++ And you're a reviewer?   +++$+++ :And you're a reviewer?  [[User:Everard Proudfoot|Everard Proudfoot]] ([[User talk:Everard Proudfoot|talk]]) 02:12, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
15390 +++$+++ Everard Proudfoot +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15388 +++$+++ 15388 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.284283020E09 +++$+++ What references prove that these people exist, that they are notable, and that they meet [[WP:BIO]]?   +++$+++ :What references prove that these people exist, that they are notable, and that they meet [[WP:BIO]]?  [[User:Everard Proudfoot|Everard Proudfoot]] ([[User talk:Everard Proudfoot|talk]]) 02:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

15393 +++$+++ Everard Proudfoot +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-12 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.284284100E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Incidents#Lists_of_names_of_non-notable_people]].   +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Lists_of_names_of_non-notable_people]].  [[User:Everard Proudfoot|Everard Proudfoot]] ([[User talk:Everard Proudfoot|talk]]) 02:35, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
15394 +++$+++ Seraphimblade +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15393 +++$+++ 15393 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.284287820E09 +++$+++ I have removed the names. Please review our [[WP:Biographies of living persons]] policy, especially those sections concerning privacy, and ensure that you do not reinsert the names of anyone who does not have an article on the ''English Wikipedia'' into any alumni list.  +++$+++ :I have removed the names. Please review our [[WP:Biographies of living persons]] policy, especially those sections concerning privacy, and ensure that you do not reinsert the names of anyone who does not have an article on the ''English Wikipedia'' into any alumni list. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 03:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

539682 +++$+++ Gimme danger +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-05 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.257431100E09 +++$+++ Hello Todor. I found you using [[:Category:User mk-N]]. The article [[Fazlagi\u0107 Tower]] has two links to the Macedonian language Wikipedia. Could you determine which of these is the best interwiki link and remove the other? Thank you. -- +++$+++ Hello Todor. I found you using [[:Category:User mk-N]]. The article [[Fazlagić Tower]] has two links to the Macedonian language Wikipedia. Could you determine which of these is the best interwiki link and remove the other? Thank you. --[[User:Gimme danger|Danger]] ([[User talk:Gimme danger|talk]]) 06:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
539683 +++$+++ Laveol +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539682 +++$+++ 539682 +++$+++ 2009-11-05 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.257477660E09 +++$+++ Are you sure there are two? I saw only [http:\/\/mk.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B0 one]. It's right on the topic. --''' +++$+++ :Are you sure there are two? I saw only [http://mk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B0 one]. It's right on the topic. --'''[[User:Laveol|<font color="#007700">L<font color="#009900">a<font color="#00aa00">v<font color="#00cc00">e</font>o</font>l</font></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Laveol|T]]</sup>''' 19:21, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
539684 +++$+++ Gimme danger +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539682 +++$+++ 539683 +++$+++ 2009-11-05 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.257483780E09 +++$+++ Todor already took care of the problem, which involved a faulty template on the page. -- +++$+++ ::Todor already took care of the problem, which involved a faulty template on the page. --[[User:Gimme danger|Danger]] ([[User talk:Gimme danger|talk]]) 21:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

15395 +++$+++  +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I am sorry that you are incorrect: the names in this section are listed in Wikipedia already, but have not all been translated into English, and are all clearly documented by references given. Furthermore not all alumni listed here--that you have incorrectly erased-- are living persons as stated in your deletion mesasage. An example of many in this list is as follows:  [http:\/\/ro.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ilie_G._Murgulescu Ilie G. Murgulescu (n. 27 ianuarie 1902, Cornu, jude\u021bul Dolj - d. 28 octombrie 1991, Bucure\u0219ti) a fost un chimist rom\xe2n, membru titular al Academiei Rom\xe2ne.] deceased in 1991 [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Bci2 Bci2] 03:40, 12 September 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ I am sorry that you are incorrect: the names in this section are listed in Wikipedia already, but have not all been translated into English, and are all clearly documented by references given. Furthermore not all alumni listed here--that you have incorrectly erased-- are living persons as stated in your deletion mesasage. An example of many in this list is as follows:  [http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilie_G._Murgulescu Ilie G. Murgulescu (n. 27 ianuarie 1902, Cornu, județul Dolj - d. 28 octombrie 1991, București) a fost un chimist român, membru titular al Academiei Române.] deceased in 1991 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bci2 Bci2] 03:40, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
15396 +++$+++ Seraphimblade +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15395 +++$+++ 15395 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.284288420E09 +++$+++ Please allow me to try to be clearer. Each person on a list of persons must have an article on the ''English Wikipedia''. If they need to be translated, you may add them to the list after, not before, you have done so. Continuing to reinsert the names will lead to a [[WP:BLOCK|block]] from editing. I don't want to do that, but you're not leaving a whole lot of choice here.  +++$+++ :Please allow me to try to be clearer. Each person on a list of persons must have an article on the ''English Wikipedia''. If they need to be translated, you may add them to the list after, not before, you have done so. Continuing to reinsert the names will lead to a [[WP:BLOCK|block]] from editing. I don't want to do that, but you're not leaving a whole lot of choice here. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 03:47, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

15397 +++$+++  +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Please see the reply above in which I have clearly indicated that 1. There are in the original list names already in the English Encyclopedia, and 2. Not all alumni listed are living as shown in the above example. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Bci2 Bci2] 03:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ Please see the reply above in which I have clearly indicated that 1. There are in the original list names already in the English Encyclopedia, and 2. Not all alumni listed are living as shown in the above example. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bci2 Bci2] 03:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
15398 +++$+++ Seraphimblade +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15397 +++$+++ 15397 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.284288780E09 +++$+++ Could you please wikilink to the articles on the people, then, instead of utilizing external links or links to other language projects, for any person who is living? As to those who are provably deceased, you are correct that they would not fall under BLP. I would not object to you adding only them (though others may on content grounds, but that's a different issue). Please ensure that the person is ''confirmed'' to be deceased through a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], however.  +++$+++ :Could you please wikilink to the articles on the people, then, instead of utilizing external links or links to other language projects, for any person who is living? As to those who are provably deceased, you are correct that they would not fall under BLP. I would not object to you adding only them (though others may on content grounds, but that's a different issue). Please ensure that the person is ''confirmed'' to be deceased through a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], however. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 03:53, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

15399 +++$+++ Everard Proudfoot +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15399 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-12 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.284288900E09 +++$+++ You're violating [[WP:3RR]].   +++$+++ You're violating [[WP:3RR]].  [[User:Everard Proudfoot|Everard Proudfoot]] ([[User talk:Everard Proudfoot|talk]]) 03:55, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
15400 +++$+++ Seraphimblade +++$+++ Bci2 +++$+++ 15399 +++$+++ 15399 +++$+++ 2010-09-12 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.284289080E09 +++$+++ BLP reverts have nothing to do with 3RR, and two is less than three. However, I've no wish to further revert you. It seems we've come to an agreement on how to move forward, so let's do that.  +++$+++ :BLP reverts have nothing to do with 3RR, and two is less than three. However, I've no wish to further revert you. It seems we've come to an agreement on how to move forward, so let's do that. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 03:58, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

539688 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-15 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.258348680E09 +++$+++ Instead of trying to start a revert war,[https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Besa_%28Albanian_culture%29&action=history] with a facade of a discussion where you falsley claim \"per talk\/discussion\", why don't you have the discussion first? Have you even bothered to read my response yet (you couldn'thave at the time as I hadn't had a chance to make it)? Posting that edit again with such a claim in the summary when I have not even had a chance to read the talk page is really crass. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ Instead of trying to start a revert war,[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Besa_%28Albanian_culture%29&action=history] with a facade of a discussion where you falsley claim "per talk/discussion", why don't you have the discussion first? Have you even bothered to read my response yet (you couldn'thave at the time as I hadn't had a chance to make it)? Posting that edit again with such a claim in the summary when I have not even had a chance to read the talk page is really crass. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 21:18, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
539689 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539688 +++$+++ 539688 +++$+++ 2009-11-15 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.258350600E09 +++$+++ Finally, I'd suggest that you take a break. Such language is unbecoming of an administrator. Even though you're not involved in the discussion as an admin, you're supposed to set some kind of example, and overreacting is by no means a good way to do that. Best, ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : Finally, I'd suggest that you take a break. Such language is unbecoming of an administrator. Even though you're not involved in the discussion as an admin, you're supposed to set some kind of example, and overreacting is by no means a good way to do that. Best, ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 21:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
539690 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539688 +++$+++ 539689 +++$+++ 2009-11-16 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.258423800E09 +++$+++ You're presuming a lot here. I'm taking off my watch list since you prefer to act before discussing.<span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::You're presuming a lot here. I'm taking off my watch list since you prefer to act before discussing.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 18:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
539691 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539688 +++$+++ 539690 +++$+++ 2009-11-16 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.258427880E09 +++$+++ Do as you wish, but this is no way to sort things out. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ ::: Do as you wish, but this is no way to sort things out. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 19:18, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

89948 +++$+++ Canada Hky +++$+++ Stone +++$+++ 89948 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-02 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.301797560E09 +++$+++ Hi, Thanks for your comment on the Taube GA review.  Would you mind taking a look at the section about his history again, and checking to see if I addressed the issue you raised?  I believe I understood what you were meaning, and in the absence of any direct evidence of how his family moved around, I added in general information about German migration to Russia, and then subsequently to North America.  Thanks!   +++$+++ Hi, Thanks for your comment on the Taube GA review.  Would you mind taking a look at the section about his history again, and checking to see if I addressed the issue you raised?  I believe I understood what you were meaning, and in the absence of any direct evidence of how his family moved around, I added in general information about German migration to Russia, and then subsequently to North America.  Thanks!  [[User:Canada Hky|Canada Hky]] ([[User talk:Canada Hky|talk]]) 19:26, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
89949 +++$+++ Stone +++$+++ Stone +++$+++ 89948 +++$+++ 89948 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.301802000E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I like the article.-- +++$+++ :Thanks! I like the article.--[[User:Stone|Stone]] ([[User talk:Stone#top|talk]]) 20:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

15402 +++$+++ Philip Trueman +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-28 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.209420060E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits{{#if:Carefree (chant)|, such as the one you made to [[:Carefree (chant)]],}} did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed.  Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee\/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits{{#if:Carefree (chant)|, such as the one you made to [[:Carefree (chant)]],}} did not appear to be constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed.  Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> [[User:Philip Trueman|Philip Trueman]] ([[User talk:Philip Trueman|talk]]) 15:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
15403 +++$+++ Philip Trueman +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15402 +++$+++ 15402 +++$+++ 2008-04-28 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.209421560E09 +++$+++ Well, Wikipedia isn't censored, but we kind of draw the line at anything [[WP:CITE|uncited]], [[WP:NOTE|non-notable]] and [[WP:LIBEL|defamatory]].  +++$+++ :Well, Wikipedia isn't censored, but we kind of draw the line at anything [[WP:CITE|uncited]], [[WP:NOTE|non-notable]] and [[WP:LIBEL|defamatory]]. [[User:Philip Trueman|Philip Trueman]] ([[User talk:Philip Trueman|talk]]) 15:26, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
15404 +++$+++ Philip Trueman +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15402 +++$+++ 15403 +++$+++ 2008-04-28 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.209423540E09 +++$+++ There's no standard about where to reply to talk page messages.  Some people like to keep everything together; some people like always to post on the addressee's talk page so they get a 'You have new messages' warning.   +++$+++ ::There's no standard about where to reply to talk page messages.  Some people like to keep everything together; some people like always to post on the addressee's talk page so they get a 'You have new messages' warning.  [[User:Philip Trueman|Philip Trueman]] ([[User talk:Philip Trueman|talk]]) 15:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

177330 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Indopug +++$+++ 177330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-26 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.301143440E09 +++$+++ KNOWLEDGE. In other news, I'm surprised that Main Page Day for [[Radiohead]] wasn't as messy as with past articles.  +++$+++ KNOWLEDGE. In other news, I'm surprised that Main Page Day for [[Radiohead]] wasn't as messy as with past articles. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 05:44, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
177331 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Indopug +++$+++ 177330 +++$+++ 177330 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.301334180E09 +++$+++ Query: are you ever going to put [[Blur (band)]] up for GAN?  +++$+++ :Query: are you ever going to put [[Blur (band)]] up for GAN? [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 10:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
177332 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Indopug +++$+++ 177330 +++$+++ 177331 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 05:53:00 +++$+++ 1.301403180E09 +++$+++ I always have to be in a certain mood to write Nirvana articles; there's so much information to sort through it requires a certain amount of drive. The article is about 75-80 percent there, I'd say; the Music and Legacy sections are the only ones that really need to be bulked up. I have no issue tackling the former, but I'm not all that into working on the latter. By the way, I figure there'd be a ''Spin'' article or two covering the 2000s for Blur, which should enable sorting that whole section out.  +++$+++ ::I always have to be in a certain mood to write Nirvana articles; there's so much information to sort through it requires a certain amount of drive. The article is about 75-80 percent there, I'd say; the Music and Legacy sections are the only ones that really need to be bulked up. I have no issue tackling the former, but I'm not all that into working on the latter. By the way, I figure there'd be a ''Spin'' article or two covering the 2000s for Blur, which should enable sorting that whole section out. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 05:53, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
177333 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Indopug +++$+++ 177330 +++$+++ 177332 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.301836860E09 +++$+++ I believe the response you are looking for is called \"headdesk\".  +++$+++ :::I believe the response you are looking for is called "headdesk". [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 06:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
177334 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Indopug +++$+++ 177330 +++$+++ 177333 +++$+++ 2011-04-03 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.301840100E09 +++$+++ I'm skimming through preview pages of this Cliff Burton biography on Amazon, and while I knew he liked R.E.M. already, it becomes clear that they were in fact one of his absolute favorite bands. He was evidently really jealous that his girlfriend got to go to an R.E.M. show while we was on tour and so he asked her to tell him what the show was like--and then he died the day of that show.  +++$+++ ::::I'm skimming through preview pages of this Cliff Burton biography on Amazon, and while I knew he liked R.E.M. already, it becomes clear that they were in fact one of his absolute favorite bands. He was evidently really jealous that his girlfriend got to go to an R.E.M. show while we was on tour and so he asked her to tell him what the show was like--and then he died the day of that show. [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] ([[User talk:WesleyDodds|talk]]) 07:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

277550 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.202970780E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 22:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
277551 +++$+++ MSJapan +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277550 +++$+++ 277550 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.202972520E09 +++$+++ I've got 98% of the FUR done, but I can't find the source.  Since you uploaded it, I would guess you know where you got it from.  Could you add that in?   +++$+++ :I've got 98% of the FUR done, but I can't find the source.  Since you uploaded it, I would guess you know where you got it from.  Could you add that in?  [[User:MSJapan|MSJapan]] ([[User talk:MSJapan|talk]]) 23:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

15407 +++$+++ David T Tokyo +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-16 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.234808640E09 +++$+++ I would be grateful if you could stop exchanging the word Myth for Legend.  This entire text (using Myth) was agreed a while back when discussing and rewriting the whole aspect of Henry VIII and Greensleeves.   As I said in my note, a Myth is a popular belief.  A legend is an unverified story (handed down from earlier times).  In this instance the use of the word legend is inappropriate because a) there is no story to be verified (Henry clearly did not write Greensleeves) and b) there is no evidence that gives longevity to story of Henry VII and Greensleeves.   In other words, it's not a legend - it's a myth.  And a complete one, at that.   +++$+++ I would be grateful if you could stop exchanging the word Myth for Legend.  This entire text (using Myth) was agreed a while back when discussing and rewriting the whole aspect of Henry VIII and Greensleeves.   As I said in my note, a Myth is a popular belief.  A legend is an unverified story (handed down from earlier times).  In this instance the use of the word legend is inappropriate because a) there is no story to be verified (Henry clearly did not write Greensleeves) and b) there is no evidence that gives longevity to story of Henry VII and Greensleeves.   In other words, it's not a legend - it's a myth.  And a complete one, at that.  [[User:David T Tokyo|David T Tokyo]] ([[User talk:David T Tokyo|talk]]) 10:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
15408 +++$+++ David T Tokyo +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15407 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.234812000E09 +++$+++ There are existing references on the Greensleeves page that give a completely opposite story.  Obviously if you are able to provide new information it will be an important development for the page.  I look forward to receiving them.  +++$+++ ::There are existing references on the Greensleeves page that give a completely opposite story.  Obviously if you are able to provide new information it will be an important development for the page.  I look forward to receiving them. [[User:David T Tokyo|David T Tokyo]] ([[User talk:David T Tokyo|talk]]) 11:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

15409 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-16 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.234842480E09 +++$+++ A look at the edit history of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Greensleeves&action=history Greensleaves] shows that you both have made three reverts to the article. Either stop or you you may be blocked for violation of [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule]].  +++$+++ A look at the edit history of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greensleeves&action=history Greensleaves] shows that you both have made three reverts to the article. Either stop or you you may be blocked for violation of [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule]]. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|Enter CambridgeBayWeather,]] [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|waits for audience applause,]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|not a sausage]] 19:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
15410 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15409 +++$+++ 15409 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.234851660E09 +++$+++ As per [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACambridgeBayWeather&diff=271190459&oldid=271111323 this] request I looked to see which word would be a better fit. After reading through both [[legend]] and [[mythology]], I think, that of the two, \"myth\" appears to be the better fit. However, I don't have any reference works, nor does there appear to be anything that would be classified as reliable on Google, about Greensleaves to indicate or source either one. There is a reference at the end of that section and it may be able to clear it up. Having said that, I really don't think that either word fits properly. I think that the word \"belief\" would be more correct in the sentence.  +++$+++ :As per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACambridgeBayWeather&diff=271190459&oldid=271111323 this] request I looked to see which word would be a better fit. After reading through both [[legend]] and [[mythology]], I think, that of the two, "myth" appears to be the better fit. However, I don't have any reference works, nor does there appear to be anything that would be classified as reliable on Google, about Greensleaves to indicate or source either one. There is a reference at the end of that section and it may be able to clear it up. Having said that, I really don't think that either word fits properly. I think that the word "belief" would be more correct in the sentence. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|Enter CambridgeBayWeather,]] [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|waits for audience applause,]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|not a sausage]] 22:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
15411 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15409 +++$+++ 15410 +++$+++ 2009-02-17 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.234909140E09 +++$+++ As both of you agreed I made the change. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::As both of you agreed I made the change. Thanks. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|Enter CambridgeBayWeather,]] [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|waits for audience applause,]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|not a sausage]] 14:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

15412 +++$+++ James500 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15412 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-18 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.234984800E09 +++$+++ Thank you for pointing out that the infobox did not say what the status of the above Act was. I have put it right. +++$+++ Thank you for pointing out that the infobox did not say what the status of the above Act was. I have put it right.[[User:James500|James500]] ([[User talk:James500|talk]]) 11:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
15413 +++$+++ QueenCake +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15412 +++$+++ 15412 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.236393120E09 +++$+++ Well, video game articles should not contain long lists of concepts, such as factions, the other Total War game articles that contain faction list have not been cleaned up yet. I also would not recommend creating an article devoted to factions and game play tips, wikipedia is [[WP:NOT#GUIDE|not a guide]], such an article would likely be quickly deleted. I would say to review [[Empire: Total War]]'s talk page for the same discussion on why factions should not be included. Cheers  +++$+++ : Well, video game articles should not contain long lists of concepts, such as factions, the other Total War game articles that contain faction list have not been cleaned up yet. I also would not recommend creating an article devoted to factions and game play tips, wikipedia is [[WP:NOT#GUIDE|not a guide]], such an article would likely be quickly deleted. I would say to review [[Empire: Total War]]'s talk page for the same discussion on why factions should not be included. Cheers [[User:QueenCake|QueenCake]] ([[User talk:QueenCake|talk]]) 18:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
15414 +++$+++ QueenCake +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15412 +++$+++ 15412 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.236393360E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/List_of_factions_in_Medieval:_Total_War  +++$+++ : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_factions_in_Medieval:_Total_War [[User:QueenCake|QueenCake]] ([[User talk:QueenCake|talk]]) 18:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
15415 +++$+++ QueenCake +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15412 +++$+++ 15414 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.236405900E09 +++$+++ To be honest, I doubt it will be possible to assert the notability of such an article and provide it with any sources. Faction lists don't really belong on wikipedia, a summary of factions in prose on the article page is easily sufficient.  +++$+++ :: To be honest, I doubt it will be possible to assert the notability of such an article and provide it with any sources. Faction lists don't really belong on wikipedia, a summary of factions in prose on the article page is easily sufficient. [[User:QueenCake|QueenCake]] ([[User talk:QueenCake|talk]]) 22:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

539701 +++$+++ Relativefrequency +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-17 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.261102800E09 +++$+++ Hello Todor. I added an interesting [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:Chernozemski_Automatic_Pistol.jpg photograph], which is now added in the Vlado Chermozemski's [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Vlado_Chernozemski article]. I thought you'd be interested to see it. :) Best. -- +++$+++ Hello Todor. I added an interesting [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chernozemski_Automatic_Pistol.jpg photograph], which is now added in the Vlado Chermozemski's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlado_Chernozemski article]. I thought you'd be interested to see it. :) Best. --[[User:Relativefrequency|Relativefrequency]] ([[User talk:Relativefrequency|talk]]) 18:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
539702 +++$+++ Relativefrequency +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539701 +++$+++ 539701 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.261107960E09 +++$+++ I found it in a very old book, it's a true rarity. Todor, I'd like to consult you about something. May I have your email?-- +++$+++ :I found it in a very old book, it's a true rarity. Todor, I'd like to consult you about something. May I have your email?--[[User:Relativefrequency|Relativefrequency]] ([[User talk:Relativefrequency|talk]]) 19:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
539703 +++$+++ Relativefrequency +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539701 +++$+++ 539702 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.261112820E09 +++$+++ I can not see the function you mentioned in the toolbox menu on the left side of your user page. What I see are seven functions, but the \"E-mail this user\" function is not displayed. Any hint?-- +++$+++ ::I can not see the function you mentioned in the toolbox menu on the left side of your user page. What I see are seven functions, but the "E-mail this user" function is not displayed. Any hint?--[[User:Relativefrequency|Relativefrequency]] ([[User talk:Relativefrequency|talk]]) 21:07, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
539704 +++$+++ Relativefrequency +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539701 +++$+++ 539703 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.261114620E09 +++$+++ Yes, I got it. Thanks. You may check your email now. I've sent you a reply.-- +++$+++ :::Yes, I got it. Thanks. You may check your email now. I've sent you a reply.--[[User:Relativefrequency|Relativefrequency]] ([[User talk:Relativefrequency|talk]]) 21:37, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

15417 +++$+++ Peanut4 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-08 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.236562800E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:FA Cup 2008\u201309|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:FA Cup 2008\u201309]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:FA Cup 2008–09|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:FA Cup 2008–09]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Peanut4|Peanut4]] ([[User talk:Peanut4|talk]]) 18:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
15418 +++$+++ DoctorHver +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15417 +++$+++ 15417 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.236625440E09 +++$+++ Forget what Peanut4 says he is an idiot any way (and there are lots of idiots on wikipedia like him anyway). The FA site list the game to be played 17 March 2009. Arsenal-Hull. I also do not get way offical club site cant be usued as wald prove.  +++$+++ *Forget what Peanut4 says he is an idiot any way (and there are lots of idiots on wikipedia like him anyway). The FA site list the game to be played 17 March 2009. Arsenal-Hull. I also do not get way offical club site cant be usued as wald prove. [[User:DoctorHver|DoctorHver]] ([[User talk:DoctorHver|talk]]) 12:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

15420 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-23 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.245801000E09 +++$+++ {{#if:|{{{notes}}}&nbsp;}}If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! \u2013''' +++$+++ {{#if:|{{{notes}}}&nbsp;}}If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 16:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
15421 +++$+++ Kingpin13 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15420 +++$+++ 15420 +++$+++ 2009-06-23 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.245803340E09 +++$+++ Tough luck. Keep up your work around here :) -  +++$+++ :Tough luck. Keep up your work around here :) - [[User:Kingpin13|Kingpin]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Kingpin13|13]]</sup> ([[User talk:Kingpin13|talk]]) 17:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

15422 +++$+++ Patken4 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-23 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.245811980E09 +++$+++ Hi!  I noticed you added a few sporting venues to [[List of sporting venues with a highest attendance of 100,000 or more]].  All three have been removed because I can't find references that they ever had an attendance of 100,000 or more people for a one day event.  [[Stamford Bridge (stadium)|Stamford Bridge]] and [[Old Trafford]]'s highest attendance are 82,905 and 76,962 respectively, so they both fall short.  The only reference for [[Ascot Racecourse]] having over 100,000 spectators is for the entire event held there, not just a one day record.  Do you have any information about the highest attendance for a one day event is at Ascot Racecourse?  Thanks!   +++$+++ Hi!  I noticed you added a few sporting venues to [[List of sporting venues with a highest attendance of 100,000 or more]].  All three have been removed because I can't find references that they ever had an attendance of 100,000 or more people for a one day event.  [[Stamford Bridge (stadium)|Stamford Bridge]] and [[Old Trafford]]'s highest attendance are 82,905 and 76,962 respectively, so they both fall short.  The only reference for [[Ascot Racecourse]] having over 100,000 spectators is for the entire event held there, not just a one day record.  Do you have any information about the highest attendance for a one day event is at Ascot Racecourse?  Thanks!  [[User:Patken4|Patken4]] ([[User talk:Patken4|talk]]) 19:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
15423 +++$+++ Patken4 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15422 +++$+++ 15422 +++$+++ 2009-06-24 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.245909900E09 +++$+++ That is the highest attendance for an event, not a sporting venue.  For instance in 2008, Manchester United attracted an average of 75,691 for their 19 home PL matches.  The highest attendance isn't 1,438,129.  It's whatever the highest attendance for one match is.  If the Royal Ascot is a five day event and over 300,000 attend it during the week, than an average of 60,000 are at the Ascot Racecourse at any given time.  I have found some sources that back a 70,000 capacity up; [http:\/\/www.javno.com\/en-sports\/royal-ascot-plays-down-attendance-fall_55537 this] and [http:\/\/www.thegoodgamblingguide.co.uk\/news\/2008\/racing\/ascot.htm this].  The highest one day figure I can find is 73,175.  Thanks!   +++$+++ :That is the highest attendance for an event, not a sporting venue.  For instance in 2008, Manchester United attracted an average of 75,691 for their 19 home PL matches.  The highest attendance isn't 1,438,129.  It's whatever the highest attendance for one match is.  If the Royal Ascot is a five day event and over 300,000 attend it during the week, than an average of 60,000 are at the Ascot Racecourse at any given time.  I have found some sources that back a 70,000 capacity up; [http://www.javno.com/en-sports/royal-ascot-plays-down-attendance-fall_55537 this] and [http://www.thegoodgamblingguide.co.uk/news/2008/racing/ascot.htm this].  The highest one day figure I can find is 73,175.  Thanks!  [[User:Patken4|Patken4]] ([[User talk:Patken4|talk]]) 23:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

539711 +++$+++ Gligan +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539711 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-05 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.262741400E09 +++$+++ The article [[History of Bulgaria (1878\u20131946)]] and the two articles [[Principality of Bulgaria]] and [[Kingdom of Bulgaria]] seem to me to be focused on the same issue. Shouldn't we have only one article for Bulgaria between 1878 and 1946 despite the fact that its name changed from principality to kingdom with the same logic as the First Bulgarian State is one article although it became an empire from a khanate? Or we should we have separate articles for the principality and the kingdom but without History of Bulgaria (1878\u20131946)? What do you suggest? -- +++$+++ The article [[History of Bulgaria (1878–1946)]] and the two articles [[Principality of Bulgaria]] and [[Kingdom of Bulgaria]] seem to me to be focused on the same issue. Shouldn't we have only one article for Bulgaria between 1878 and 1946 despite the fact that its name changed from principality to kingdom with the same logic as the First Bulgarian State is one article although it became an empire from a khanate? Or we should we have separate articles for the principality and the kingdom but without History of Bulgaria (1878–1946)? What do you suggest? --[[User:Gligan|Gligan]] ([[User talk:Gligan|talk]]) 17:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
539712 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539711 +++$+++ 539711 +++$+++ 2010-01-05 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.262742600E09 +++$+++ First Bulgarian Empire is okay at the moment. It would be more difficult and controversial to split it into Bulgarian Khanate, First Bulgarian Empire... and First (?) Bulgarian Principality (Boris and Vladimir)? Surely, this is not something that is commonly done, not least because ''khanate'' was never the name of the entity and the principality period was brief. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : First Bulgarian Empire is okay at the moment. It would be more difficult and controversial to split it into Bulgarian Khanate, First Bulgarian Empire... and First (?) Bulgarian Principality (Boris and Vladimir)? Surely, this is not something that is commonly done, not least because ''khanate'' was never the name of the entity and the principality period was brief. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 17:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

15424 +++$+++ Patken4 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15424 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-26 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.246003320E09 +++$+++ In addition, I'm thinking of making a [[List of closed stadiums by capacity]] article and have it linked from the list of stadiums by capacity]].  That way, the list of stadiums by capacity can be for current stadiums.  The new article would for any closed, former, unused, or demolished stadiums that had a capacity of 30,000 or more spectators at the time of it's closing.  I think we have all stadiums that held 40,000 or more, and all the stadiums in Europe 30,000 or over.  What do you think?  Thanks!   +++$+++ In addition, I'm thinking of making a [[List of closed stadiums by capacity]] article and have it linked from the list of stadiums by capacity]].  That way, the list of stadiums by capacity can be for current stadiums.  The new article would for any closed, former, unused, or demolished stadiums that had a capacity of 30,000 or more spectators at the time of it's closing.  I think we have all stadiums that held 40,000 or more, and all the stadiums in Europe 30,000 or over.  What do you think?  Thanks!  [[User:Patken4|Patken4]] ([[User talk:Patken4|talk]]) 01:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
15425 +++$+++ Patken4 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15424 +++$+++ 15424 +++$+++ 2009-06-26 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.246074600E09 +++$+++ Great, I'll get started on the new article now.  Thanks!   +++$+++ :Great, I'll get started on the new article now.  Thanks!  [[User:Patken4|Patken4]] ([[User talk:Patken4|talk]]) 20:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

539713 +++$+++ Hittit +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-06 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.262805420E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}<\/code> to '''the top of [[:Bulgarians in Turkey|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or \"db\" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Bulgarians in Turkey|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-repost-notice -->   +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Bulgarians in Turkey|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Bulgarians in Turkey|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-repost-notice -->  [[User:Hittit|Hittit]] ([[User talk:Hittit|talk]]) 11:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
539714 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539713 +++$+++ 539713 +++$+++ 2010-01-06 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.262808180E09 +++$+++ Why don't you discuss the issues instead of going gung-ho for all-out deletion? There is no reason whatsoever to delete this article rather than improve it. Remember that your goal as a Wikipedian is to contribute, not to destroy. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : Why don't you discuss the issues instead of going gung-ho for all-out deletion? There is no reason whatsoever to delete this article rather than improve it. Remember that your goal as a Wikipedian is to contribute, not to destroy. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 12:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

15427 +++$+++ Johnhousefriday +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-21 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.248216180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Johnhousefriday|Johnhousefriday]] ([[User talk:Johnhousefriday|talk]]) 15:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
15428 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15427 +++$+++ 15427 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.248216480E09 +++$+++ And further guidelines on referring to peers generally are [[WP:PEERAGE|here]]. Cheers.  +++$+++ :And further guidelines on referring to peers generally are [[WP:PEERAGE|here]]. Cheers. [[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 15:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

539719 +++$+++ Kostja +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-20 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.264002600E09 +++$+++ I see that in the article about Kavarna, you told Athenean that Greek names are permitted in articles about Bulgarian cities. However, the same user has removed almost all Bulgarian names from the names of Greek cities. I find this highly hypocritical and I don't think he should be encouraged.  +++$+++ I see that in the article about Kavarna, you told Athenean that Greek names are permitted in articles about Bulgarian cities. However, the same user has removed almost all Bulgarian names from the names of Greek cities. I find this highly hypocritical and I don't think he should be encouraged. [[User:Kostja|Kostja]] ([[User talk:Kostja|talk]]) 07:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
539720 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539719 +++$+++ 539719 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.264004940E09 +++$+++ So yeah, if you feel like it, be bold and insert the Bulgarian names absolutely everywhere you wish (but stick to the guidelines and use the Names section if there is one). The removal of foreign names, however, is unjustified and I honestly don't see why you consider it such a big deal. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : So yeah, if you feel like it, be bold and insert the Bulgarian names absolutely everywhere you wish (but stick to the guidelines and use the Names section if there is one). The removal of foreign names, however, is unjustified and I honestly don't see why you consider it such a big deal. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 08:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
539721 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539719 +++$+++ 539720 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.264007880E09 +++$+++ There is a bit of a difference:  Places like [[Kastoria]] and [[Florina]] have multiple relevant foreign names (Bulgarian, Makedonskian, Albanian, Turkish, Aromanian), as well as interesting etymologies.  This is why they have separate Name sections, which in my opinion is the most elegant solution (as we did in [[Cape Kaliakra]]).  So I'll tell you what, for places with multiple relevant foreign names, if separate name sections are created for these articles, I would be ok with removing the foreign names  from the lead and put them there.   +++$+++ ::There is a bit of a difference:  Places like [[Kastoria]] and [[Florina]] have multiple relevant foreign names (Bulgarian, Makedonskian, Albanian, Turkish, Aromanian), as well as interesting etymologies.  This is why they have separate Name sections, which in my opinion is the most elegant solution (as we did in [[Cape Kaliakra]]).  So I'll tell you what, for places with multiple relevant foreign names, if separate name sections are created for these articles, I would be ok with removing the foreign names  from the lead and put them there.  [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean|talk]]) 09:18, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
539722 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539719 +++$+++ 539721 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.264008180E09 +++$+++ I don't see a big difference, and neither do the criteria. Places in Bulgaria also have multiple foreign names and interesting etymologies, so Name section are often created. Where available, Bulgarian names of Greek places should go to a name section, but when there is none, the lead is the suitable location per WP:NCGN. If history doesn't work for Pomorie or Sozopol, then why should it work for Veria? ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ ::: I don't see a big difference, and neither do the criteria. Places in Bulgaria also have multiple foreign names and interesting etymologies, so Name section are often created. Where available, Bulgarian names of Greek places should go to a name section, but when there is none, the lead is the suitable location per WP:NCGN. If history doesn't work for Pomorie or Sozopol, then why should it work for Veria? ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 09:23, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
539723 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539719 +++$+++ 539722 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.264008540E09 +++$+++ That's fine, as long as two things are kept in mind:  The 10% rule, and neutral sourcing if you want to establish that Bulgarians inhabited a particular place.  +++$+++ ::::That's fine, as long as two things are kept in mind:  The 10% rule, and neutral sourcing if you want to establish that Bulgarians inhabited a particular place. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean|talk]]) 09:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

277577 +++$+++  +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-15 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.239800100E09 +++$+++ Snyder will probably hit the [[main page]] in a little over 27 hours from now as part of the DYK according to the [[T:DYK\/Q]].  I was contemplating makeing a map with the business district and the two [[National Register of Historic Places]] listings.  However, we should probably only have one map for the hamlet.  Any chance we can have a map before it hits the main page.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ Snyder will probably hit the [[main page]] in a little over 27 hours from now as part of the DYK according to the [[T:DYK/Q]].  I was contemplating makeing a map with the business district and the two [[National Register of Historic Places]] listings.  However, we should probably only have one map for the hamlet.  Any chance we can have a map before it hits the main page.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 05:55, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
277578 +++$+++  +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277577 +++$+++ 277577 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.239881220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for forcing me to learn [[OpenStreetMap]] from [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost\/2009-04-06\/Interactive_maps|last week's signpost]] so that I could create [[:File:Snyder, New York map.png]] myself.  Now, I just need to get the template fixed to accept three maps in the next 6.5 hours.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ :Thanks for forcing me to learn [[OpenStreetMap]] from [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-04-06/Interactive_maps|last week's signpost]] so that I could create [[:File:Snyder, New York map.png]] myself.  Now, I just need to get the template fixed to accept three maps in the next 6.5 hours.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 04:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

15434 +++$+++ TreasuryTag +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-11 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.255307160E09 +++$+++ [[User:The C of E]], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion\/User:The C of E ]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>).  You are free to edit the content of [[User:The C of E]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion.  Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> <font color=\"#C4112F\">\u255f\u2500 +++$+++ [[User:The C of E]], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The C of E ]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).  You are free to edit the content of [[User:The C of E]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion.  Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> <font color="#C4112F">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">senator</span>]]─╢</font> 17:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
15435 +++$+++ Bfigura +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15434 +++$+++ 15434 +++$+++ 2009-10-11 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.255309860E09 +++$+++ Would you consider removing the content in question from your user page? Per [[WP:UP#NOT]], it shouldn't be there (personal views are okay, but ones that are likely to be inflammatory should be avoided), and it's likely to cause less drama in the end if you simply pull it yourself. Best, -- +++$+++ :Would you consider removing the content in question from your user page? Per [[WP:UP#NOT]], it shouldn't be there (personal views are okay, but ones that are likely to be inflammatory should be avoided), and it's likely to cause less drama in the end if you simply pull it yourself. Best, --[[User:Bfigura|<font color="Green">'''B'''</font><font color="Blue">figura</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bfigura|talk]])</sup> 18:11, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

277579 +++$+++ Leszek Jańczuk +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-04 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.241474580E09 +++$+++ Did I make a mistake? It is also popular name for every higher oak, used also in belarussian literature. The same name has the highest oak of Belarus. Of course the article is not finished and should be expanded. I will think about it.  +++$+++ Did I make a mistake? It is also popular name for every higher oak, used also in belarussian literature. The same name has the highest oak of Belarus. Of course the article is not finished and should be expanded. I will think about it. [[User:Leszek Jańczuk|Leszek Jańczuk]] ([[User talk:Leszek Jańczuk|talk]]) 15:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
277580 +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277579 +++$+++ 277579 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.241760600E09 +++$+++ I didn't have anything to do with the redirect of your article, but it appears that the reason it was redirected to [[Bia\u0142owie\u017ca Forest]] is because it was decided that the Tsar Oak which is the main tree described (to which you have added a bit about a different \"Tsar Oak\") isn't notable enough for an article.  That decision was made [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Tsar Oak|here]] almost two years ago.  Further, the comment by someone about the name was that an article on the tree you added shouldn't be named \"D\u0105b Car\" because since it's in Belarus (and presumably not in the forest that straddles the border with Poland), it's not called \"D\u0105b Car\", only \"\u0426\u0430\u0440\u044c-\u0434\u0443\u0431\" (and should be in English on the English Wikipedia, anyway).  +++$+++ :I didn't have anything to do with the redirect of your article, but it appears that the reason it was redirected to [[Białowieża Forest]] is because it was decided that the Tsar Oak which is the main tree described (to which you have added a bit about a different "Tsar Oak") isn't notable enough for an article.  That decision was made [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsar Oak|here]] almost two years ago.  Further, the comment by someone about the name was that an article on the tree you added shouldn't be named "Dąb Car" because since it's in Belarus (and presumably not in the forest that straddles the border with Poland), it's not called "Dąb Car", only "Царь-дуб" (and should be in English on the English Wikipedia, anyway). [[User:Lexicon|Lexicon]] <small>[[User talk:Lexicon|(talk)]]</small> 22:30, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
277581 +++$+++ Leszek Jańczuk +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277579 +++$+++ 277580 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.241761980E09 +++$+++ Ps. two years ago I was not wikipedian.  +++$+++ :: Ps. two years ago I was not wikipedian. [[User:Leszek Jańczuk|Leszek Jańczuk]] ([[User talk:Leszek Jańczuk|talk]]) 22:53, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

539724 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-20 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.264011180E09 +++$+++ French military authorities counted 7,222 people in the town in 1920, after the Bulgarian occupation: 3,900 Bulgarians, 2,500 Greeks, 512 Armenians, 165 Jews, 195 Turks. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ French military authorities counted 7,222 people in the town in 1920, after the Bulgarian occupation: 3,900 Bulgarians, 2,500 Greeks, 512 Armenians, 165 Jews, 195 Turks. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 10:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
539725 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539724 +++$+++ 539724 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 10:15:00 +++$+++ 1.264011300E09 +++$+++ Also, [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?as_q=dedeagach&num=10&hl=bg&btnG=Google+%D1%82%D1%8A%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_brr=3&as_pt=ALLTYPES&lr=lang_en&as_vt=&as_auth=&as_pub=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&as_isbn=&as_issn= consider this]. Prior to the renaming, Dedeagach was the dominant spelling, and not in the modern Turkish orthography. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : Also, [http://books.google.com/books?as_q=dedeagach&num=10&hl=bg&btnG=Google+%D1%82%D1%8A%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_brr=3&as_pt=ALLTYPES&lr=lang_en&as_vt=&as_auth=&as_pub=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&as_isbn=&as_issn= consider this]. Prior to the renaming, Dedeagach was the dominant spelling, and not in the modern Turkish orthography. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 10:15, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
539726 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539724 +++$+++ 539725 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.264044240E09 +++$+++ Did it for Burgas.  But could you please put in a word with Gligan over this.  He seems not to be board.  +++$+++ ::Did it for Burgas.  But could you please put in a word with Gligan over this.  He seems not to be board. [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean|talk]]) 19:24, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
539727 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539724 +++$+++ 539725 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.264048620E09 +++$+++ Re Nesebar\/Mesembria and Primorie\/Anchialos, searches of Google books in Greek return nothing for \"\u039d\u03b5\u03c3\u03b5\u03bc\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\" [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?lr=lang_el&hl=el&as_brr=0&q=%CE%9D%CE%B5%CF%83%CE%B5%CE%BC%CF%80%CE%B1%CF%81&btnG=%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7+%CE%92%CE%B9%CE%B2%CE%BB%CE%AF%CF%89%CE%BD] and \"\u03a0\u03c1\u03b9\u03bc\u03bf\u03c1\u03b9\u03b5\" [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?lr=lang_el&hl=el&as_brr=0&q=%CE%A0%CF%81%CE%B9%CE%BC%CE%BF%CF%81%CE%B9%CE%B5&btnG=%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7+%CE%92%CE%B9%CE%B2%CE%BB%CE%AF%CF%89%CE%BD], but return hundreds of hits for \"\u039c\u03b5\u03c3\u03b7\u03bc\u03b2\u03c1\u03af\u03b1\" [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?lr=lang_el&hl=el&as_brr=0&q=%CE%9C%CE%B5%CF%83%CE%B7%CE%BC%CE%B2%CF%81%CE%B9%CE%B1&btnG=%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7+%CE%92%CE%B9%CE%B2%CE%BB%CE%AF%CF%89%CE%BD] and \"\u0391\u03b3\u03c7\u03af\u03b1\u03bb\u03bf\u03c2\" [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?lr=lang_el&hl=el&as_brr=0&q=%CE%91%CE%B3%CF%87%CE%B9%CE%B1%CE%BB%CE%BF%CF%82&btnG=%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7+%CE%92%CE%B9%CE%B2%CE%BB%CE%AF%CF%89%CE%BD], which strongly suggests the latter two are common Greek usage.  Ditto for Sozopol (I'd be ''very'' surprised if common Greek usage was \"\u03a3\u03bf\u03b6\u03bf\u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\").   +++$+++ ::Re Nesebar/Mesembria and Primorie/Anchialos, searches of Google books in Greek return nothing for "Νεσεμπαρ" [http://books.google.com/books?lr=lang_el&hl=el&as_brr=0&q=%CE%9D%CE%B5%CF%83%CE%B5%CE%BC%CF%80%CE%B1%CF%81&btnG=%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7+%CE%92%CE%B9%CE%B2%CE%BB%CE%AF%CF%89%CE%BD] and "Πριμοριε" [http://books.google.com/books?lr=lang_el&hl=el&as_brr=0&q=%CE%A0%CF%81%CE%B9%CE%BC%CE%BF%CF%81%CE%B9%CE%B5&btnG=%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7+%CE%92%CE%B9%CE%B2%CE%BB%CE%AF%CF%89%CE%BD], but return hundreds of hits for "Μεσημβρία" [http://books.google.com/books?lr=lang_el&hl=el&as_brr=0&q=%CE%9C%CE%B5%CF%83%CE%B7%CE%BC%CE%B2%CF%81%CE%B9%CE%B1&btnG=%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7+%CE%92%CE%B9%CE%B2%CE%BB%CE%AF%CF%89%CE%BD] and "Αγχίαλος" [http://books.google.com/books?lr=lang_el&hl=el&as_brr=0&q=%CE%91%CE%B3%CF%87%CE%B9%CE%B1%CE%BB%CE%BF%CF%82&btnG=%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7+%CE%92%CE%B9%CE%B2%CE%BB%CE%AF%CF%89%CE%BD], which strongly suggests the latter two are common Greek usage.  Ditto for Sozopol (I'd be ''very'' surprised if common Greek usage was "Σοζοπολ").  [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean|talk]]) 20:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
539728 +++$+++ Kostja +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539724 +++$+++ 539727 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.264052880E09 +++$+++ You know, nothing says that English usage means only Google Books. In fact, contemporary usage might be better determined by using plain Google search.  +++$+++ :::You know, nothing says that English usage means only Google Books. In fact, contemporary usage might be better determined by using plain Google search. [[User:Kostja|Kostja]] ([[User talk:Kostja|talk]]) 21:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
539729 +++$+++ Athenean +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539724 +++$+++ 539728 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.264057920E09 +++$+++ Raw google searches overwhelmingly return hotel and travel sites and all manner of junk, see for yourself.  In my experience, common usage always means common usage by '''reliable sources'''.  We are not interesting in travel reservation sites and commercial websites.  For the recent Macedonia naming dispute case [[WP:ARBMAC2]], the mother of all naming disputes, it was universally agreed that common English usage would be established by looking at Google Books, Scholar, News and various Atlases.   +++$+++ ::::Raw google searches overwhelmingly return hotel and travel sites and all manner of junk, see for yourself.  In my experience, common usage always means common usage by '''reliable sources'''.  We are not interesting in travel reservation sites and commercial websites.  For the recent Macedonia naming dispute case [[WP:ARBMAC2]], the mother of all naming disputes, it was universally agreed that common English usage would be established by looking at Google Books, Scholar, News and various Atlases.  [[User:Athenean|Athenean]] ([[User talk:Athenean|talk]]) 23:12, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

277585 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-09 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.249881480E09 +++$+++ [[:File:White Castle and Churchs.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:White Castle and Churchs.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:White Castle and Churchs.jpg]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:File:White Castle and Churchs.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:White Castle and Churchs.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:White Castle and Churchs.jpg]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 22:18, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
277586 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277585 +++$+++ 277585 +++$+++ 2009-11-20 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.258746120E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Kit trousers pinstripesonwhite redbelt.png]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Kit trousers pinstripesonwhite redbelt.png]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Kit trousers pinstripesonwhite redbelt.png]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Kit trousers pinstripesonwhite redbelt.png]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 11:42, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

15443 +++$+++ Xanderliptak +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15443 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-21 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.261422300E09 +++$+++ I added the full titles because not every title can be simplified so easily.  There is no 'Prime Minister of Italy', the actual title is President of the Council of Ministers, not to be confused with the President of the Italian Republic.  There is no 'King of Saudi Arabia\", but The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques which is a title held as equivalent to a king.  Sheikh Khalifa is the President of the whole U.A.E., but also hold the princely title of emir of one of the emirates, something that needs to be distinguished.  It really does no harm to add the full titles, and adding them only gives better clarity to avoid colloquialisms and misunderstandings. I hope you would agree that adding the full titles does no harm, and is a more accurate description than the simplified equivalents given and would allow me to edit as such.  <span style=\"border-top:0 px solid black;font-size:80%\">[[User talk:Xanderliptak|<span style=\"background-color:black;color:white\">'''[tk]'''<\/span>]]  +++$+++ I added the full titles because not every title can be simplified so easily.  There is no 'Prime Minister of Italy', the actual title is President of the Council of Ministers, not to be confused with the President of the Italian Republic.  There is no 'King of Saudi Arabia", but The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques which is a title held as equivalent to a king.  Sheikh Khalifa is the President of the whole U.A.E., but also hold the princely title of emir of one of the emirates, something that needs to be distinguished.  It really does no harm to add the full titles, and adding them only gives better clarity to avoid colloquialisms and misunderstandings. I hope you would agree that adding the full titles does no harm, and is a more accurate description than the simplified equivalents given and would allow me to edit as such.  <span style="border-top:0 px solid black;font-size:80%">[[User talk:Xanderliptak|<span style="background-color:black;color:white">'''[tk]'''</span>]] [[User:Xanderliptak|<span style="color:black">XANDERLIPTAK</span>]]</span> 11:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
15444 +++$+++ Xanderliptak +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15443 +++$+++ 15443 +++$+++ 2010-01-02 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.262447220E09 +++$+++ The Antilles and Aruba are autonomous regions but still part of the Kingdom of The Netherlands, much like Scotland and Wales within the United Kingdom.  I like to keep the list of countries short because it draws undo attention to European monarchs who tended to make each new territory a kingdom and thus another title for themselves.  <span style=\"border-top:0 px solid black;font-size:80%\">[[User talk:Xanderliptak|<span style=\"background-color:black;color:white\">'''[tk]'''<\/span>]]  +++$+++ :The Antilles and Aruba are autonomous regions but still part of the Kingdom of The Netherlands, much like Scotland and Wales within the United Kingdom.  I like to keep the list of countries short because it draws undo attention to European monarchs who tended to make each new territory a kingdom and thus another title for themselves.  <span style="border-top:0 px solid black;font-size:80%">[[User talk:Xanderliptak|<span style="background-color:black;color:white">'''[tk]'''</span>]] [[User:Xanderliptak|<span style="color:black">XANDERLIPTAK</span>]]</span> 07:47, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

15445 +++$+++ Ged UK +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-04 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.262671980E09 +++$+++ At this point, semi-protection wouldn't address the issue. If one editor embarks on an edit war, then they can be dealt with individually. If there is a pick-up in similar content from IPs, then relist as necessary. Additionally, have you used the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources\/Noticeboard]] to address the issue of whether the Ethiopian Review is reliable?  +++$+++ At this point, semi-protection wouldn't address the issue. If one editor embarks on an edit war, then they can be dealt with individually. If there is a pick-up in similar content from IPs, then relist as necessary. Additionally, have you used the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard]] to address the issue of whether the Ethiopian Review is reliable? [[User:Ged UK|<font color="green">Ged</font>]][[User talk:Ged UK|<font color="orange">'''''UK'''''</font>&nbsp;]] 22:13, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
15446 +++$+++ Xanderliptak +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15445 +++$+++ 15445 +++$+++ 2010-01-07 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.262934180E09 +++$+++ I added my perspective, though it may be too late.  Therequiembellishere also seems to not care about the time spent coming to a conclusion about what to do with HM Elizabeth's II sixteen nations.  <span style=\"border-top:0 px solid black;font-size:80%\">[[User talk:Xanderliptak|<span style=\"background-color:black;color:white\">'''[tk]'''<\/span>]]  +++$+++ :I added my perspective, though it may be too late.  Therequiembellishere also seems to not care about the time spent coming to a conclusion about what to do with HM Elizabeth's II sixteen nations.  <span style="border-top:0 px solid black;font-size:80%">[[User talk:Xanderliptak|<span style="background-color:black;color:white">'''[tk]'''</span>]] [[User:Xanderliptak|<span style="color:black">XANDERLIPTAK</span>]]</span> 23:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

277591 +++$+++ S@bre +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-12 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.258076040E09 +++$+++ You mean the Grim Fandango screenshot on the [[LucasArts adventure games]] article? I'm seeing it fine, in both the article and [[:File:Manny and Merche.jpg|on the file page]]. I can't understand why you're seeing it as red, try clearing your browser cache or purging the page. --  +++$+++ You mean the Grim Fandango screenshot on the [[LucasArts adventure games]] article? I'm seeing it fine, in both the article and [[:File:Manny and Merche.jpg|on the file page]]. I can't understand why you're seeing it as red, try clearing your browser cache or purging the page. -- [[User:S@bre|Sabre]] ([[User talk:S@bre|talk]]) 17:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
277592 +++$+++ S@bre +++$+++ Lexicon +++$+++ 277591 +++$+++ 277591 +++$+++ 2009-11-13 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.258156560E09 +++$+++ I've asked a few other users, and they're not having any problems with the image. I'm afraid its something your end. --  +++$+++ :I've asked a few other users, and they're not having any problems with the image. I'm afraid its something your end. -- [[User:S@bre|Sabre]] ([[User talk:S@bre|talk]]) 15:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

539737 +++$+++ Geschichte +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-05 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.265395020E09 +++$+++ Hi! Would it be okay for you to insert the Cyrillic names of [[Vanya Gospodinova]] and [[Rumyana Chavdarova]]? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi! Would it be okay for you to insert the Cyrillic names of [[Vanya Gospodinova]] and [[Rumyana Chavdarova]]? Thanks, [[User:Geschichte|Geschichte]] ([[User talk:Geschichte|talk]]) 10:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
539738 +++$+++ Geschichte +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539737 +++$+++ 539737 +++$+++ 2010-02-05 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.265400360E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I tried myself at [[Stefka Yordanova]], did I get it right?  +++$+++ :Thank you. I tried myself at [[Stefka Yordanova]], did I get it right? [[User:Geschichte|Geschichte]] ([[User talk:Geschichte|talk]]) 12:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

15451 +++$+++ BigDom +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15451 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-14 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.266202740E09 +++$+++ <div class=\"floatleft\" style=\"margin-bottom:0\">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]<\/div>I have nominated [[List of pheonix clubs]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of pheonix clubs]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> --  +++$+++ <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[List of pheonix clubs]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of pheonix clubs]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> -- [[User:BigDom|<span style="color:#990033">Big</span>]][[User talk:BigDom|<span style="color:#3BB0FF"><small>Dom</small></span>]] 18:59, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
15452 +++$+++ BigDom +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15451 +++$+++ 15451 +++$+++ 2010-02-14 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.266203280E09 +++$+++ It's not really the name of the list that is the problem, it's the fact that it is complete original research and can never be completed, especially going off your definition that a club that has been formed as a protest is included. Can you please explain to me how F.C. United are a \"phoenix club\" when they clearly have not \"risen from the ashes\" from any previous team. As far as I'm aware, Manchester United are still doing pretty well for themselves. --  +++$+++ :It's not really the name of the list that is the problem, it's the fact that it is complete original research and can never be completed, especially going off your definition that a club that has been formed as a protest is included. Can you please explain to me how F.C. United are a "phoenix club" when they clearly have not "risen from the ashes" from any previous team. As far as I'm aware, Manchester United are still doing pretty well for themselves. -- [[User:BigDom|<span style="color:#990033">Big</span>]][[User talk:BigDom|<span style="color:#3BB0FF"><small>Dom</small></span>]] 19:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
15453 +++$+++ BigDom +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15451 +++$+++ 15452 +++$+++ 2010-02-14 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.266203640E09 +++$+++ I don't see how a list of protest and reborn clubs would be helpful, seeing as they are two entirely different concepts. Anyway, we'll just have to see what other editors think over the next seven days now. Cheers --  +++$+++ ::I don't see how a list of protest and reborn clubs would be helpful, seeing as they are two entirely different concepts. Anyway, we'll just have to see what other editors think over the next seven days now. Cheers -- [[User:BigDom|<span style="color:#990033">Big</span>]][[User talk:BigDom|<span style="color:#3BB0FF"><small>Dom</small></span>]] 19:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

539741 +++$+++ Assayas +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-10 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.265858100E09 +++$+++ {{tnull|helpme}} do you have the data about the population of bulgaria, at the eve of WWI?, thanks -- +++$+++ {{tnull|helpme}} do you have the data about the population of bulgaria, at the eve of WWI?, thanks --[[User:Assayas|Assayas]] ([[User talk:Assayas|talk]]) 19:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
539742 +++$+++ Algebraist +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539741 +++$+++ 539741 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.265858520E09 +++$+++ I don't, and {{tnull|helpme}} isn't a very good way to find people who do (since it's only monitored by a few people, few of whom are knowledgable about Bulgarian history). [[WP:RD\/H|The humanities reference desk]] is the best place on Wikipedia to ask this question.  +++$+++ :I don't, and {{tnull|helpme}} isn't a very good way to find people who do (since it's only monitored by a few people, few of whom are knowledgable about Bulgarian history). [[WP:RD/H|The humanities reference desk]] is the best place on Wikipedia to ask this question. [[User talk:Algebraist|Algebraist]] 19:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
539743 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539741 +++$+++ 539742 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.265868840E09 +++$+++ It's my user page, so I ought to be the one who says whether I do or I don't. Assayas, I'll see what I can find tomorrow, and I'll post back on your talk. There's no reason why such data should be unavailable. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ :: It's my user page, so I ought to be the one who says whether I do or I don't. Assayas, I'll see what I can find tomorrow, and I'll post back on your talk. There's no reason why such data should be unavailable. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 22:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

113992 +++$+++ Jakednb +++$+++ Hammersfan +++$+++ 113992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-10 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.286751420E09 +++$+++ I wish to use this symbol on a translation for the [[Royal Tank Regiment]]. The picture seems to be copyrighted, however, There is the Commonwealth copyright law stating that government pictures\\symbols made prior to 1957 are made free to use for public use ([[Crown copyright]]). Would you please check the copyright status of this picture again and perhaps change it. The picture in question is this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:RTR_cap_badge.gif]. Whatever the case, my intended use for this symbol is only on a translation of the same value on the RTR.  +++$+++ I wish to use this symbol on a translation for the [[Royal Tank Regiment]]. The picture seems to be copyrighted, however, There is the Commonwealth copyright law stating that government pictures\symbols made prior to 1957 are made free to use for public use ([[Crown copyright]]). Would you please check the copyright status of this picture again and perhaps change it. The picture in question is this [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RTR_cap_badge.gif]. Whatever the case, my intended use for this symbol is only on a translation of the same value on the RTR. [[User:Jakednb|Jakednb]] ([[User talk:Jakednb|talk]]) 15:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
113993 +++$+++ Jakednb +++$+++ Hammersfan +++$+++ 113992 +++$+++ 113992 +++$+++ 2010-10-11 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.286787180E09 +++$+++ Many thanks. I have uploaded the image to Wikimedia commons under you name and the PD-UKgov license so it can be used by other Wikipedia languages.  +++$+++ :Many thanks. I have uploaded the image to Wikimedia commons under you name and the PD-UKgov license so it can be used by other Wikipedia languages. [[User:Jakednb|Jakednb]] ([[User talk:Jakednb|talk]]) 01:53, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

15457 +++$+++ Mk5384 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-09 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.268196000E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your responses. Unfortunately, I am in the middle of several important matters at the time, and may need to take a couple of weeks off from Wikipedia. Sealand is indeed soverign,. As I have pointed out, an English court has ruled that it has no jurisdiction over it. Once I have worked out a couple of personal issues, I will return to Wikipedia. Hopefully, you and I can work together to improve the article some more. All the best- +++$+++ Thank you for your responses. Unfortunately, I am in the middle of several important matters at the time, and may need to take a couple of weeks off from Wikipedia. Sealand is indeed soverign,. As I have pointed out, an English court has ruled that it has no jurisdiction over it. Once I have worked out a couple of personal issues, I will return to Wikipedia. Hopefully, you and I can work together to improve the article some more. All the best-[[User:Mk5384|Mk5384]] ([[User talk:Mk5384|talk]]) 20:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
15458 +++$+++ Mk5384 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15457 +++$+++ 15457 +++$+++ 2010-03-13 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.268470800E09 +++$+++ Even though I am taking a break, I am still peeking in from time to time. They reverted Sealand twice, and I have undone it both times. I went on the talk page, and clarified exactly why it does belong, and insisted that if anyone else reverts it, that they post a valid reason for doing so on the talk page. So far, so good, as it has now remained for almost 3 days. We'll see. And by the way, if someone does revert it, and you feel so inclined, go right ahead and undo it. It will not be in violation of any policy unless you were to do it ad infinitum. We have both discussed it at length, and given solid reasons on the talk page. They have reverted without even commenting on the talk page. I am certainly loathe to have an edit war with anyone, as that does nothing to help this encyclopedia. However, we have stated our case clearly, and have supported it with reliable sources. The burden of proof is now on them. +++$+++ :Even though I am taking a break, I am still peeking in from time to time. They reverted Sealand twice, and I have undone it both times. I went on the talk page, and clarified exactly why it does belong, and insisted that if anyone else reverts it, that they post a valid reason for doing so on the talk page. So far, so good, as it has now remained for almost 3 days. We'll see. And by the way, if someone does revert it, and you feel so inclined, go right ahead and undo it. It will not be in violation of any policy unless you were to do it ad infinitum. We have both discussed it at length, and given solid reasons on the talk page. They have reverted without even commenting on the talk page. I am certainly loathe to have an edit war with anyone, as that does nothing to help this encyclopedia. However, we have stated our case clearly, and have supported it with reliable sources. The burden of proof is now on them.[[User:Mk5384|Mk5384]] ([[User talk:Mk5384|talk]]) 01:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

483174 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483174 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-04 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.188948720E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 16:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
483175 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483174 +++$+++ 483174 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.188948780E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much!  :)  \u2014 +++$+++ :Thank you very much!  :)  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 16:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

15462 +++$+++ Ged UK +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-18 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.268964600E09 +++$+++ Hi there! I saw Taelus' comment at RPP regarding your reverts at [[List of English football club owners]]. Rollback would have allowed you to do that with one click, rather than 5. Have a look at [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature]], and if you fancy having it, leave a message here and I'll turn it on for you. I've seen you around often enough to trust you.  +++$+++ Hi there! I saw Taelus' comment at RPP regarding your reverts at [[List of English football club owners]]. Rollback would have allowed you to do that with one click, rather than 5. Have a look at [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature]], and if you fancy having it, leave a message here and I'll turn it on for you. I've seen you around often enough to trust you. [[User:Ged UK|<font color="green">Ged</font>]][[User talk:Ged UK|<font color="orange">'''''UK'''''</font>&nbsp;]] 19:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
15463 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15462 +++$+++ 15462 +++$+++ 2010-03-18 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.268967660E09 +++$+++ I'd be delighted to accept. Thank You.  +++$+++ : I'd be delighted to accept. Thank You. [[User:The C of E|The C of E.           God Save The Queen!]] ([[User talk:The C of E#top|talk]]) 20:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
15464 +++$+++ Ged UK +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15462 +++$+++ 15463 +++$+++ 2010-03-18 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.268969700E09 +++$+++ {{done}}. It's self evident how it works. Remember, it's ONLY for vandalism; if you're not sure, don't use it! It can only be used on the most recent edits on a page, and it will roll back all of that user\/IP's edits until it finds someone else's: i.e. last five edits are by an IP and '''ALL''' are vandalism, you can rollback ALL of them (and only all of them, no selection). Let me know if you've any queries!  +++$+++ ::{{done}}. It's self evident how it works. Remember, it's ONLY for vandalism; if you're not sure, don't use it! It can only be used on the most recent edits on a page, and it will roll back all of that user/IP's edits until it finds someone else's: i.e. last five edits are by an IP and '''ALL''' are vandalism, you can rollback ALL of them (and only all of them, no selection). Let me know if you've any queries! [[User:Ged UK|<font color="green">Ged</font>]][[User talk:Ged UK|<font color="orange">'''''UK'''''</font>&nbsp;]] 20:35, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
15465 +++$+++ Ged UK +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15462 +++$+++ 15464 +++$+++ 2010-03-19 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.269029280E09 +++$+++ See also [[Wikipedia:New admin school\/Rollback]]. Rollback used to be an admin only feature, but then got released wider :)  +++$+++ :::See also [[Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback]]. Rollback used to be an admin only feature, but then got released wider :) [[User:Ged UK|<font color="green">Ged</font>]][[User talk:Ged UK|<font color="orange">'''''UK'''''</font>&nbsp;]] 13:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

539751 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-27 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.267314060E09 +++$+++ Hi! You uploaded some files on Commons from this account http:\/\/picasaweb.google.com\/svetlanabanat. The license on the images on Picasa is (now) \"All rights reserved\". Was license free before, did you get a permission or? Perhaps you can leave a comment on your talkpage on Commons? -- +++$+++ Hi! You uploaded some files on Commons from this account http://picasaweb.google.com/svetlanabanat. The license on the images on Picasa is (now) "All rights reserved". Was license free before, did you get a permission or? Perhaps you can leave a comment on your talkpage on Commons? --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73|talk]]) 15:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
539752 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539751 +++$+++ 539751 +++$+++ 2010-02-27 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.267319040E09 +++$+++ Best, ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ :Best, ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 17:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
539753 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539751 +++$+++ 539752 +++$+++ 2010-02-28 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.267383420E09 +++$+++ No problem. That is why I told you here :-) You can farward the mail(s) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. It is not a problem that it is in Bulgarian (we should have som voulenteers that can read that). The importaint is that the owner gave a clear permission (identified the images and accepted a license). If something is missing the voulenteers should inform you. -- +++$+++ ::No problem. That is why I told you here :-) You can farward the mail(s) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. It is not a problem that it is in Bulgarian (we should have som voulenteers that can read that). The importaint is that the owner gave a clear permission (identified the images and accepted a license). If something is missing the voulenteers should inform you. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73|talk]]) 10:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

15466 +++$+++ Mk5384 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15466 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-09 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.270808280E09 +++$+++ I just got your note on my talk page, and yes, I will do everything I can to help with that. My schedule is almost unbelieveable right now, so I don't have the time to look into it this very moment. I will, however, check it out soon, and get back to you. Thank's for the note. All the best. +++$+++ I just got your note on my talk page, and yes, I will do everything I can to help with that. My schedule is almost unbelieveable right now, so I don't have the time to look into it this very moment. I will, however, check it out soon, and get back to you. Thank's for the note. All the best.[[User:Mk5384|Mk5384]] ([[User talk:Mk5384|talk]]) 03:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
15467 +++$+++ Mk5384 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15466 +++$+++ 15466 +++$+++ 2010-04-12 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.271091840E09 +++$+++ I've checked out, and it is amazing. The editor who removed it has stated that the talk page is \"a conversation between two users\", whilst himself choosing to unilateraly remove something that other editors have let stand for over a month. It was removed; we made our case; they seemed to agree. Now one editor has decided it dosen't belong? Bollocks! Also, the comments about a \"juvenile nonsense joke\", and \"this absurdity\", in lieu of AGF'ing do not sit well with me. I will happily put it back, and post some more facts substantiating it on the talk page whilst I'm at it. Here is the problem: I need your help again. Whilst I am constantly endevouring to learn, I still have next to no skills whatsoever on the computer. I now understand how to add it in there. I just can't seem to figure how to insert it alphetabetically without disrupting the others. If you could kindly leave me a brief note of explanation, I would much appreciate it. After I restore it, I will also ask for the opinions of other editors to see where everyone else stands in reference to Sealand. The others seem to be OK with it now, but we'll see. All the best![[User:Mk5384|Mk5384]] ([[User talk:Mk5384|talk]]) 05:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)<br \/><br \/>I have added it once more, but I'm afraid that's about as far as I'm prepared to go with this. I have added more comments to the talk page, explaining the case for inclusion, whilst attempting to rebut the comments of the editor who removed it. If something such as Somaliland belongs, Sealand absolutely belongs. However, I'm not about to have any edit wars, and I just don't have the time at this point to keep fighting for it. It will probably be removed again, and if it is, know that we gave it a good shot, and maybe we can get back to it at some point. All the best +++$+++ :I've checked out, and it is amazing. The editor who removed it has stated that the talk page is "a conversation between two users", whilst himself choosing to unilateraly remove something that other editors have let stand for over a month. It was removed; we made our case; they seemed to agree. Now one editor has decided it dosen't belong? Bollocks! Also, the comments about a "juvenile nonsense joke", and "this absurdity", in lieu of AGF'ing do not sit well with me. I will happily put it back, and post some more facts substantiating it on the talk page whilst I'm at it. Here is the problem: I need your help again. Whilst I am constantly endevouring to learn, I still have next to no skills whatsoever on the computer. I now understand how to add it in there. I just can't seem to figure how to insert it alphetabetically without disrupting the others. If you could kindly leave me a brief note of explanation, I would much appreciate it. After I restore it, I will also ask for the opinions of other editors to see where everyone else stands in reference to Sealand. The others seem to be OK with it now, but we'll see. All the best![[User:Mk5384|Mk5384]] ([[User talk:Mk5384|talk]]) 05:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)<br /><br />I have added it once more, but I'm afraid that's about as far as I'm prepared to go with this. I have added more comments to the talk page, explaining the case for inclusion, whilst attempting to rebut the comments of the editor who removed it. If something such as Somaliland belongs, Sealand absolutely belongs. However, I'm not about to have any edit wars, and I just don't have the time at this point to keep fighting for it. It will probably be removed again, and if it is, know that we gave it a good shot, and maybe we can get back to it at some point. All the best[[User:Mk5384|Mk5384]] ([[User talk:Mk5384|talk]]) 10:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

264722 +++$+++ Izno +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-10 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.257848040E09 +++$+++ ...to act like you weren't being a rouge admin! I KNOW YOU FOR WHAT YOU REALLY ARE! -- +++$+++ ...to act like you weren't being a rouge admin! I KNOW YOU FOR WHAT YOU REALLY ARE! --[[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 02:14, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
264723 +++$+++ Izno +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264722 +++$+++ 264722 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.257892500E09 +++$+++ Complete and total sarcasm in an attempt at humor, indeed. -- +++$+++ :Complete and total sarcasm in an attempt at humor, indeed. --[[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 14:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
264724 +++$+++ Izno +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264722 +++$+++ 264723 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.257900360E09 +++$+++ :) -- +++$+++ :: :) --[[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 16:46, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

277614 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-27 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.198805700E09 +++$+++ [Outdent added] An interesting fact, which is completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand.   +++$+++ [Outdent added] An interesting fact, which is completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 17:35, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
277615 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277614 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.198814040E09 +++$+++ No, I don\u2019t think it sets a precedent.  If we collectively determine that its inclusion in this article is inappropriate, then its inclusion is also inappropriate in the Anna Nicole article (even if not yet corrected), or any other article for that matter.  Its inclusion as a source elsewhere bears no relevance to whether its use is appropriate.  +++$+++ ::No, I don’t think it sets a precedent.  If we collectively determine that its inclusion in this article is inappropriate, then its inclusion is also inappropriate in the Anna Nicole article (even if not yet corrected), or any other article for that matter.  Its inclusion as a source elsewhere bears no relevance to whether its use is appropriate. [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 19:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
277616 +++$+++ Hu12 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277614 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.198806240E09 +++$+++ I suggested to Lazydown to text dump the relevant part on the talk page so we all can look at it. No one should be required to pay or register to view relevant content. Anna Nicole Smith isn't being disputed, Remember the responsibility for justifying inclusion of any content rests firmly with the editor seeking to include it. -- +++$+++ :::I suggested to Lazydown to text dump the relevant part on the talk page so we all can look at it. No one should be required to pay or register to view relevant content. Anna Nicole Smith isn't being disputed, Remember the responsibility for justifying inclusion of any content rests firmly with the editor seeking to include it. --[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 17:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
277617 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277614 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.198817820E09 +++$+++ I hope he does so, but to date, he has not.  +++$+++ ::::I hope he does so, but to date, he has not. [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 20:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

15471 +++$+++ Fishhead2100 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-12 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.271059380E09 +++$+++ You need to expand the article with history and stuff.  I added a little bit of it.  But if you want to use any information and use the links provided in the second deletion discussion, then you should start to do so now.  <span style=\"background:black\"><span style=\"color:red\">Mr. C.C.<\/span><sup> +++$+++ You need to expand the article with history and stuff.  I added a little bit of it.  But if you want to use any information and use the links provided in the second deletion discussion, then you should start to do so now.  <span style="background:black"><span style="color:red">Mr. C.C.</span><sup>[[User talk:Fishhead2100|<span style="color:white">Hey yo!</span>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Fishhead2100|<span style="color:red">I didn't do it!</span>]]</sub></span> 01:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
15472 +++$+++ Alastair Haines +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15471 +++$+++ 15471 +++$+++ 2010-04-12 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.271114580E09 +++$+++ God bless brother  +++$+++ :God bless brother [[User:Alastair Haines|Alastair Haines]] ([[User talk:Alastair Haines|talk]]) 16:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

15473 +++$+++ Da Vynci +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-01 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.272707220E09 +++$+++ Hi, correct me if I am wrong, but from your edit summary you sounded like you prefer full names as oppose to vague and short names. You said \"there is no need to shorten it...\" yet you keep [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_stadiums_by_capacity&action=historysubmit&diff=357873745&oldid=357873005 reverting] [[Hong Kong National Football Team]] and [[South China AA]] back to to ''Hong Kong'' and ''South China'', what is going on? What you are saying is the exact opposite of what you are doing, lol.  +++$+++ Hi, correct me if I am wrong, but from your edit summary you sounded like you prefer full names as oppose to vague and short names. You said "there is no need to shorten it..." yet you keep [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_stadiums_by_capacity&action=historysubmit&diff=357873745&oldid=357873005 reverting] [[Hong Kong National Football Team]] and [[South China AA]] back to to ''Hong Kong'' and ''South China'', what is going on? What you are saying is the exact opposite of what you are doing, lol. [[User:Da Vynci|Da Vynci]] ([[User talk:Da Vynci|talk]]) 02:47, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
15474 +++$+++ Da Vynci +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15473 +++$+++ 15473 +++$+++ 2010-05-01 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.272765600E09 +++$+++ No worries. Oh yeah, I like your userbox, I am not sure if u r serious about it, but I appreciate the [[black humour]]. XD  +++$+++ *No worries. Oh yeah, I like your userbox, I am not sure if u r serious about it, but I appreciate the [[black humour]]. XD [[User:Da Vynci|Da Vynci]] ([[User talk:Da Vynci|talk]]) 19:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
15475 +++$+++ Da Vynci +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15473 +++$+++ 15473 +++$+++ 2010-05-01 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.272770040E09 +++$+++ In that case, u do aware that every wish comes with a price, right? In the real world, the leaders in PR China in 80s were (and still are) all ready to roll over HK [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989|with tanks]] and cut off their water and food supplies, plus UK's lack of commitment to defend HK, that's why u guys signed [[Sino-British Joint Declaration|that agreement]] to sell HK out. In order for your wish to be fulfilled, UK has to back out from that international treaty she signed with China in the 80s, deal with the subsequent hostility from the [[Communist state|Communists alliance]], suppress China through diplomatic, economic and very likely military means. After this, reach a new agreement with China (if that ever happens), then a large number of troops will need to station in HK to prevent invasion and civil unrest. Seeing how UK struggled to send troops to suppress opposition force in third world countries like Afghanistan, what is the price to suppress a nuclear states like China? So the question is, are people in UK willing to pay such cost?  +++$+++ *In that case, u do aware that every wish comes with a price, right? In the real world, the leaders in PR China in 80s were (and still are) all ready to roll over HK [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989|with tanks]] and cut off their water and food supplies, plus UK's lack of commitment to defend HK, that's why u guys signed [[Sino-British Joint Declaration|that agreement]] to sell HK out. In order for your wish to be fulfilled, UK has to back out from that international treaty she signed with China in the 80s, deal with the subsequent hostility from the [[Communist state|Communists alliance]], suppress China through diplomatic, economic and very likely military means. After this, reach a new agreement with China (if that ever happens), then a large number of troops will need to station in HK to prevent invasion and civil unrest. Seeing how UK struggled to send troops to suppress opposition force in third world countries like Afghanistan, what is the price to suppress a nuclear states like China? So the question is, are people in UK willing to pay such cost? [[User:Da Vynci|Da Vynci]] ([[User talk:Da Vynci|talk]]) 20:14, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
15476 +++$+++ Da Vynci +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15473 +++$+++ 15473 +++$+++ 2010-05-01 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.272771540E09 +++$+++ I am really ROFL reading your view. <s>That is as unlikely for London to declare independence from UK and then request to be a US territory.<\/s> This is as unlikely as for Alaska to declare independence from USA and then request to be a Russian territory.  +++$+++ *I am really ROFL reading your view. <s>That is as unlikely for London to declare independence from UK and then request to be a US territory.</s> This is as unlikely as for Alaska to declare independence from USA and then request to be a Russian territory. [[User:Da Vynci|Da Vynci]] ([[User talk:Da Vynci|talk]]) 20:39, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

277618 +++$+++ Lazydown +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-27 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.198815480E09 +++$+++ Okay, what do you feel the unintended reader would take away from reading that section?  This is a relevant question see [[WP:COATRACK]]-- +++$+++ Okay, what do you feel the unintended reader would take away from reading that section?  This is a relevant question see [[WP:COATRACK]]--[[User:Lazydown|Lazydown]] ([[User talk:Lazydown|talk]]) 20:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
277619 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277618 +++$+++ 277618 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.198815600E09 +++$+++ That's not important what I think some \"unintended reader\"[?] (I assume if they are reading it, they are not doing so under duress) would take away from the section. The information is verifiable, comes from reliable sources, and informs the reader. This is a biographical article about Howe, not an advertisement. The Vikesland incident is part of his biography not because I say so, but because HE says so through his actions.   +++$+++ :That's not important what I think some "unintended reader"[?] (I assume if they are reading it, they are not doing so under duress) would take away from the section. The information is verifiable, comes from reliable sources, and informs the reader. This is a biographical article about Howe, not an advertisement. The Vikesland incident is part of his biography not because I say so, but because HE says so through his actions.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 20:20, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
277620 +++$+++ Hu12 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277618 +++$+++ 277619 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.198885440E09 +++$+++ Disagree that this is any form of Coatrack article.  \"''An article about an astronaut might mostly focus on his moon landing. A moon trip that took only tiny fraction of the astronaut's life takes up most of the article. But that does not make it a coatrack article. The event was a significant moment in the subject's life, and his main claim to notability. ''\"<sup>[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:COATRACK#What_is_not_a_coatrack]<\/sup>-- +++$+++ ::Disagree that this is any form of Coatrack article.  "''An article about an astronaut might mostly focus on his moon landing. A moon trip that took only tiny fraction of the astronaut's life takes up most of the article. But that does not make it a coatrack article. The event was a significant moment in the subject's life, and his main claim to notability. ''"<sup>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:COATRACK#What_is_not_a_coatrack]</sup>--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 15:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

15477 +++$+++ GainLine +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-05 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.273075440E09 +++$+++ The [[List of rugby union players banned for contact with eyes or the eye area of an an opponent|article]] survived the debate (barely). Thanks for the support  +++$+++ The [[List of rugby union players banned for contact with eyes or the eye area of an an opponent|article]] survived the debate (barely). Thanks for the support [[User:GainLine|<font face="jokerman" color="navy">'''G'''<small><s>ain</s></small>'''Line '''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/GainLine|<font color="black">♠</font>]] <sub> [[User talk:GainLine|<font color="red">♥</font>]]</sub> 09:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
15478 +++$+++ GainLine +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15477 +++$+++ 15477 +++$+++ 2010-05-05 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.273098300E09 +++$+++ only have to save a few dozen more articles to get my Rugby union barnstar! cheers!  +++$+++ :only have to save a few dozen more articles to get my Rugby union barnstar! cheers! [[User:GainLine|<font face="jokerman" color="navy">'''G'''<small><s>ain</s></small>'''Line '''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/GainLine|<font color="black">♠</font>]] <sub> [[User talk:GainLine|<font color="red">♥</font>]]</sub> 15:25, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

277622 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-11 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.200099540E09 +++$+++ You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the [[WP:AfD|articles for deletion]] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.  Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDNote -->  +++$+++ You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the [[WP:AfD|articles for deletion]] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.  Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDNote --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 16:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
277623 +++$+++ CarbonLifeForm +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277622 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-12 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.200165120E09 +++$+++ I have now requested a sockpuppet check on Kingofmann\/ Lazydown. -  +++$+++ :::I have now requested a sockpuppet check on Kingofmann/ Lazydown. - [[User:CarbonLifeForm|CarbonLifeForm]] ([[User talk:CarbonLifeForm|talk]]) 11:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

277624 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277624 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-09 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.199931120E09 +++$+++ Citing [David Howe's] <s>your<\/s> valid privacy concerns, I have added relevant information about [his] <s>your<\/s> occupation to [his] <s>your<\/s> [[BLP]] that comes from a verifiable, referenced source, but have removed a link to [his] <s>your<\/s> business' website. Will this suffice? Newguy34 (talk) 18:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ Citing [David Howe's] <s>your</s> valid privacy concerns, I have added relevant information about [his] <s>your</s> occupation to [his] <s>your</s> [[BLP]] that comes from a verifiable, referenced source, but have removed a link to [his] <s>your</s> business' website. Will this suffice? Newguy34 (talk) 18:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
277625 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277624 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.199940060E09 +++$+++ Important note before this escelates into legal threats. Do not make threats or claims of legal action on Wikipedia. If you have a dispute with the Community or its members, use [[dispute resolution]]. A polite report of a legal problem such as defamation, ect., is not threatening and will be acted on quickly. If you do choose to take legal action, please refrain from editing until it is resolved and note that your user account or IP address may be blocked.--Hu12 (talk) 20:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ ::Important note before this escelates into legal threats. Do not make threats or claims of legal action on Wikipedia. If you have a dispute with the Community or its members, use [[dispute resolution]]. A polite report of a legal problem such as defamation, ect., is not threatening and will be acted on quickly. If you do choose to take legal action, please refrain from editing until it is resolved and note that your user account or IP address may be blocked.--Hu12 (talk) 20:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
277626 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277624 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.199942340E09 +++$+++ I believe I asked Hu12 for some help with this yesterday. I'm making no legal threats against Wikipedia instead I have referred to them for help. I'd still appreciate that help. Referencing a business I own has no place in the article and is the same as giving trouble makers a phone number where they can attempt to reach me or just harass my employees which is exactly what has happened here.--Kingofmann (talk) 21:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :::I believe I asked Hu12 for some help with this yesterday. I'm making no legal threats against Wikipedia instead I have referred to them for help. I'd still appreciate that help. Referencing a business I own has no place in the article and is the same as giving trouble makers a phone number where they can attempt to reach me or just harass my employees which is exactly what has happened here.--Kingofmann (talk) 21:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
277627 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277624 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.199942580E09 +++$+++ Understood. Should attempt dispute resolution in respect with those concerns. --Hu12 (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ ::::Understood. Should attempt dispute resolution in respect with those concerns. --Hu12 (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
277628 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277624 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.199943180E09 +++$+++ David, I asked if the solution I posed was acceptable. I assume from your response, which involves the serious matter of reference to your lawyer, that it is not. Please note that I removed the link to your business website. The fact that you own a Glass Doctor franchise in Frederick is a matter of public record and comes from press releases penned by (or authorized by) you. I can not see how it now should be excluded (in its present form) from a biographical article [emphasis added] on grounds of privacy. Newguy34 (talk) 21:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :::::David, I asked if the solution I posed was acceptable. I assume from your response, which involves the serious matter of reference to your lawyer, that it is not. Please note that I removed the link to your business website. The fact that you own a Glass Doctor franchise in Frederick is a matter of public record and comes from press releases penned by (or authorized by) you. I can not see how it now should be excluded (in its present form) from a biographical article [emphasis added] on grounds of privacy. Newguy34 (talk) 21:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
277629 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277624 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.199943780E09 +++$+++ Hu12, I am taking it to dispute resolution if I have to delete it once again. My telephone numbers are a matter of public record too that doesn't mean that someone isn't violating my privacy by posting them in my BLP inviting people to give me a call asking people who work for me if I fear loosing my citizenship and being deported and where they will work in the near future..five times in the last 3 days. It is baseless, juvenile and extremely disruptive.--Kingofmann (talk) 21:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ ::::::Hu12, I am taking it to dispute resolution if I have to delete it once again. My telephone numbers are a matter of public record too that doesn't mean that someone isn't violating my privacy by posting them in my BLP inviting people to give me a call asking people who work for me if I fear loosing my citizenship and being deported and where they will work in the near future..five times in the last 3 days. It is baseless, juvenile and extremely disruptive.--Kingofmann (talk) 21:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
277630 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277624 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.199944440E09 +++$+++ But, no one has posted your phone numbers, and there is no evidence that the calls came from people reading your biography. There is ample press coverage of your business venture, and it therefore qualifies for inclusion in your BLP, which remember, is not an auto-BLP. The rest is red-herring. Newguy34 (talk) 21:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :::::::But, no one has posted your phone numbers, and there is no evidence that the calls came from people reading your biography. There is ample press coverage of your business venture, and it therefore qualifies for inclusion in your BLP, which remember, is not an auto-BLP. The rest is red-herring. Newguy34 (talk) 21:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

15482 +++$+++ Beyond My Ken +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-26 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.274922000E09 +++$+++ Hello.  I 've started a discussion about your name and sig on the AN\/I thread you began about a possibly hijacked account.  +++$+++ Hello.  I 've started a discussion about your name and sig on the AN/I thread you began about a possibly hijacked account. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 18:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
15483 +++$+++ Beyond My Ken +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15482 +++$+++ 15482 +++$+++ 2010-05-27 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.274949840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your civility this afternoon, it is appreciated.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your civility this afternoon, it is appreciated. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 01:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

46271 +++$+++ Kahuroa +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-26 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.290773100E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:222.154.237.194 this anon's] edits to Kiwi and your warning, they have been at it again with [[Weta]]. Oops cancel that, your warning is over a year old, my bad  +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:222.154.237.194 this anon's] edits to Kiwi and your warning, they have been at it again with [[Weta]]. Oops cancel that, your warning is over a year old, my bad [[User:Kahuroa|Kahuroa]] ([[User talk:Kahuroa|talk]]) 04:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
46272 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46271 +++$+++ 46271 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.290779220E09 +++$+++ No worries, I've added a new warning level one message. If unconstructive edits continue after four I'd normally list the address at [[WP:AIV]].  +++$+++ :No worries, I've added a new warning level one message. If unconstructive edits continue after four I'd normally list the address at [[WP:AIV]]. [[User:XLerate|XLerate]] ([[User talk:XLerate#top|talk]]) 05:47, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

277631 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277631 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-09 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.199945880E09 +++$+++ Hey there! I saw [David Howe's] <s>your<\/s> request for protection of [his] <s>your<\/s> article at [[WP:RFPP]], and have fully protected the article, since semi-protection would only restrict anonymous IPs and newly-registered users from editing. May I suggest that you try holding a diaogue with the user(s) on your talk page, one of theirs, or even on the article's page? I hope this helps, and that the issue is resolved quickly, as we don't want any of our editors unhappy, upset, or harassed around here. When the issue has been resolved, you can easily request unprotection of the article back at [[WP:RFPP]], or just leave a message on my talk page. Best of luck, and happy editing! :) Jmlk17 22:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ Hey there! I saw [David Howe's] <s>your</s> request for protection of [his] <s>your</s> article at [[WP:RFPP]], and have fully protected the article, since semi-protection would only restrict anonymous IPs and newly-registered users from editing. May I suggest that you try holding a diaogue with the user(s) on your talk page, one of theirs, or even on the article's page? I hope this helps, and that the issue is resolved quickly, as we don't want any of our editors unhappy, upset, or harassed around here. When the issue has been resolved, you can easily request unprotection of the article back at [[WP:RFPP]], or just leave a message on my talk page. Best of luck, and happy editing! :) Jmlk17 22:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
277632 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277631 +++$+++ 277631 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.199951040E09 +++$+++ I don't believe it is possible to discuss anything with these editors as they have one agenda and it is not consistent with my concerns or Wikipedia standards and policies. Unless an administrator is able to resolve this issue I will seek arbitration through Wikipedia's offer of assistance.--Kingofmann (talk) 23:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :I don't believe it is possible to discuss anything with these editors as they have one agenda and it is not consistent with my concerns or Wikipedia standards and policies. Unless an administrator is able to resolve this issue I will seek arbitration through Wikipedia's offer of assistance.--Kingofmann (talk) 23:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
277633 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277631 +++$+++ 277632 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.199977500E09 +++$+++ David, your assertion that I am somehow in cahoots with other editors in promoting the website in question is completely baseless and without merit. You know well that you have no data or other evidence of an orchestration involving me. I know you know this because I know there is no such data or evidence that implicates me. Be very careful of the accusations you make when you are frustrated that the attempts of some to highjack this [[BLP]] are failing. You have '''threatened me with legal action''' (a threat to which I take personal offense, but to which I don't give much credibility) and now you have '''stated untruths''' about me. If you have this data as it relates to me, let's see it. If not (and I know you do not because no internet service provider would dare voluntarily provide it to any lawyer), you would be wise to retract this libelous statement and cease further such assertions. This nonsense about \"the service provider providing you with contact and log in data\" and \"cross referencing that with information Wikipedia has provided\" is a flat out lie. You know it, and should be ashamed of your actions. Newguy34 (talk) 07:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ ::David, your assertion that I am somehow in cahoots with other editors in promoting the website in question is completely baseless and without merit. You know well that you have no data or other evidence of an orchestration involving me. I know you know this because I know there is no such data or evidence that implicates me. Be very careful of the accusations you make when you are frustrated that the attempts of some to highjack this [[BLP]] are failing. You have '''threatened me with legal action''' (a threat to which I take personal offense, but to which I don't give much credibility) and now you have '''stated untruths''' about me. If you have this data as it relates to me, let's see it. If not (and I know you do not because no internet service provider would dare voluntarily provide it to any lawyer), you would be wise to retract this libelous statement and cease further such assertions. This nonsense about "the service provider providing you with contact and log in data" and "cross referencing that with information Wikipedia has provided" is a flat out lie. You know it, and should be ashamed of your actions. Newguy34 (talk) 07:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
277634 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277631 +++$+++ 277633 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.200091380E09 +++$+++ At Talk:David_Howe_(claimant_to_King_of_Mann)\/Archive_2#Celebrity_Friends_and_Royal_Cousins you defended including the blacklisted site on my BLP. It is rather premature to suggest legal action against anyone in this case. I believe that this can be resolved with the help of the Wikipedia arbitration committee. A separate issue, the hosting company for the blacklisted site, 123-reg Pipex Communications in Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UK, made the registration information of the site's owner available to my representatives. The author\/owner of the site is also a member of the Amersham Town Council in Amersham, Bucks, UK. He used the same address and phone number that is currently publicly listed for him on the Amersham Town Council website to register his blacklisted website about me.--Kingofmann (talk) 14:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :::At Talk:David_Howe_(claimant_to_King_of_Mann)/Archive_2#Celebrity_Friends_and_Royal_Cousins you defended including the blacklisted site on my BLP. It is rather premature to suggest legal action against anyone in this case. I believe that this can be resolved with the help of the Wikipedia arbitration committee. A separate issue, the hosting company for the blacklisted site, 123-reg Pipex Communications in Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UK, made the registration information of the site's owner available to my representatives. The author/owner of the site is also a member of the Amersham Town Council in Amersham, Bucks, UK. He used the same address and phone number that is currently publicly listed for him on the Amersham Town Council website to register his blacklisted website about me.--Kingofmann (talk) 14:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
277635 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277631 +++$+++ 277634 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.200094020E09 +++$+++ There are no more writings by me on this subject. Asking other editors to engage in a discussion about their point of view is not the same as defending or promotion, as you assert. As to the registration information being given to your representative, I find that hard to believe as it carries with it serious privacy violations. Additionally, MA-R (the author of the site) is easily \"googled\" to see that he ran unsuccessfully (at least once) for town council in Amersham, so if you do have this information, you may have the wrong guy. If he is on the town council, the information you cite is easily obtainable by anyone, so the implication that it is some smoking gun obtained by your lawyer simply does not hold together. But, all of that aside for a moment, how does that in any way implicate me in your conspiracy theory? Again, your assertion that I am somehow in cahoots with other editors in promoting the website in question is completely baseless and without merit. I think you owe me an apology. Newguy34 (talk) 15:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ ::::There are no more writings by me on this subject. Asking other editors to engage in a discussion about their point of view is not the same as defending or promotion, as you assert. As to the registration information being given to your representative, I find that hard to believe as it carries with it serious privacy violations. Additionally, MA-R (the author of the site) is easily "googled" to see that he ran unsuccessfully (at least once) for town council in Amersham, so if you do have this information, you may have the wrong guy. If he is on the town council, the information you cite is easily obtainable by anyone, so the implication that it is some smoking gun obtained by your lawyer simply does not hold together. But, all of that aside for a moment, how does that in any way implicate me in your conspiracy theory? Again, your assertion that I am somehow in cahoots with other editors in promoting the website in question is completely baseless and without merit. I think you owe me an apology. Newguy34 (talk) 15:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
277636 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277631 +++$+++ 277635 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.200096960E09 +++$+++ Please stop your harassment and attempts to besmirch my character and do not post anything more to me. You can visit the Amersham Town Council website and find all the contact name address and phone number for \"MA-R\" as you say. It is the same contact information of the owner\/author of the blacklisted site as provided by the hosting company. There is no defense of that. Now please respect my privacy and do not post here again. I do not wish to have anymore public involvement. Take your concerns to the arbitration committee. Go away!--Kingofmann (talk) 16:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :::::Please stop your harassment and attempts to besmirch my character and do not post anything more to me. You can visit the Amersham Town Council website and find all the contact name address and phone number for "MA-R" as you say. It is the same contact information of the owner/author of the blacklisted site as provided by the hosting company. There is no defense of that. Now please respect my privacy and do not post here again. I do not wish to have anymore public involvement. Take your concerns to the arbitration committee. Go away!--Kingofmann (talk) 16:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
277637 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277631 +++$+++ 277636 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.200098160E09 +++$+++ It is not harrassment, it is an attempt at [[dispute resolution]], and to set the record clear about your assertions related to me. I can not force you to work with me to resolve this, but I can (and do) take great offense to the '''legal threats''' you have made against me, and the '''false, unsubstantiated assertions''' you have made about me. My question is about how I am implicated in your conspiracy theory? You have not addressed that point. But, if you refuse to attempt dispute resolution and refuse to exercise good faith, I will respect your wishes. It's a shame, though, as it doesn't look very good for the legitimacy of your claim to act this way, IMO. Newguy34 (talk) 16:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ ::::::It is not harrassment, it is an attempt at [[dispute resolution]], and to set the record clear about your assertions related to me. I can not force you to work with me to resolve this, but I can (and do) take great offense to the '''legal threats''' you have made against me, and the '''false, unsubstantiated assertions''' you have made about me. My question is about how I am implicated in your conspiracy theory? You have not addressed that point. But, if you refuse to attempt dispute resolution and refuse to exercise good faith, I will respect your wishes. It's a shame, though, as it doesn't look very good for the legitimacy of your claim to act this way, IMO. Newguy34 (talk) 16:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

15490 +++$+++ Sequal1 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-13 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.279037400E09 +++$+++ I didn't realise I wasn't supposed to post there, I'll read the instructions next time :)  +++$+++ I didn't realise I wasn't supposed to post there, I'll read the instructions next time :) [[User:Sequal1|Sequal1]] ([[User talk:Sequal1|talk]]) 09:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
15491 +++$+++ Sequal1 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15490 +++$+++ 15490 +++$+++ 2010-07-13 09:25:00 +++$+++ 1.279038300E09 +++$+++ No worries, these things happen :D  +++$+++ :No worries, these things happen :D [[User:Sequal1|Sequal1]] ([[User talk:Sequal1|talk]]) 09:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

539779 +++$+++ Cplakidas +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539779 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-29 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.269896400E09 +++$+++ Hello Todor! I have just begun an article on [[Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria]], and am gradually expanding it. As it concerns a crucial period in Bulgarian history, but Bulgarian aspects are rather a bit lacking from the available bibliography (except for Fine's book), it'd be nice if you could check it as it goes along and carry out or propose changes\/modifications\/additions. Best regards,  +++$+++ Hello Todor! I have just begun an article on [[Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria]], and am gradually expanding it. As it concerns a crucial period in Bulgarian history, but Bulgarian aspects are rather a bit lacking from the available bibliography (except for Fine's book), it'd be nice if you could check it as it goes along and carry out or propose changes/modifications/additions. Best regards, [[User:Cplakidas|Constantine]]  [[User talk:Cplakidas| ✍ ]] 14:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
539780 +++$+++ Cplakidas +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539779 +++$+++ 539779 +++$+++ 2010-03-30 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.270008540E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for the quick reply. I'll try to finish as much as I can over the next few days before Easter. As I told Gligan, the chief concerns I hope to be addressed by Bulgarian sources fall into three broad categories: a) the Bulgarian participation in the military side of the conflict, b) the perceptions by the Bulgarians of the Rus' occupation and of the Byzantine \"liberation\", both contemporary and modern, and c) the effects on Bulgarian statehood. Any help, criticism or advice would be welcome. Happy Easter meanwhile, and best regards,  +++$+++ :OK, thanks for the quick reply. I'll try to finish as much as I can over the next few days before Easter. As I told Gligan, the chief concerns I hope to be addressed by Bulgarian sources fall into three broad categories: a) the Bulgarian participation in the military side of the conflict, b) the perceptions by the Bulgarians of the Rus' occupation and of the Byzantine "liberation", both contemporary and modern, and c) the effects on Bulgarian statehood. Any help, criticism or advice would be welcome. Happy Easter meanwhile, and best regards, [[User:Cplakidas|Constantine]]  [[User talk:Cplakidas| ✍ ]] 21:09, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

15492 +++$+++ Elektrik Shoos +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-22 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.279855860E09 +++$+++ <div class=\"floatleft\" style=\"margin-bottom:0\">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]<\/div>I have nominated [[The C of E:List of Teams named after a sponsor]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/The C of E:List of Teams named after a sponsor]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ''' +++$+++ <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[The C of E:List of Teams named after a sponsor]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The C of E:List of Teams named after a sponsor]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> '''[[User:Elektrik Shoos|<font color="#FFCC66">elektrik</font>]][[User talk:Elektrik Shoos|<font color="#666666">SHOOS</font>]]''' 20:31, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
15493 +++$+++ TFOWR +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15492 +++$+++ 15492 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.279857360E09 +++$+++ Per the request in the AfD by {{user|The C of E}}, I've userfied the article to  +++$+++ :Per the request in the AfD by {{user|The C of E}}, I've userfied the article to [[User:The C of E/List of Teams named after a sponsor]]. I've also closed the AfD, in what is perhaps the worst AfD close I've ever seen ("speedy Userfied"). I'm blaming the AfD close script I used... Hopefully this is all non-controversial, if anyone's looking for me I'm hiding under my bed! [[User talk:TFOWR|<b style="color:#000">TFOW</b><b style="color:#F00">R</b>]] 20:56, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

15494 +++$+++ East of Borschov +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-25 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.280065560E09 +++$+++ '''comment''' I have moved [[The C of E\/List of sports clubs owned by other sports clubs]] to your user space:  +++$+++ '''comment''' I have moved [[The C of E/List of sports clubs owned by other sports clubs]] to your user space: [[User:The C of E/List of sports clubs owned by other sports clubs]]. [[User talk:East of Borschov|East of Borschov]] 06:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
15495 +++$+++  +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15494 +++$+++ 15494 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.283307600E09 +++$+++ OK, you have had two months to forget! I have moved [[User The C of E\/List of clubs inspired by others]] to  +++$+++ * OK, you have had two months to forget! I have moved [[User The C of E/List of clubs inspired by others]] to [[User:The C of E/List of clubs inspired by others]]. &mdash; [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]]&nbsp;{{toolbar|separator=dot|[[::User talk:RHaworth|talk]] | [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]] }} 19:20, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

15496 +++$+++ Mo ainm +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-25 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.280085900E09 +++$+++ <div class=\"floatleft\" style=\"margin-bottom:0\">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]<\/div>I have nominated [[List of sponsored sports competitions]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of sponsored sports competitions]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning -->  +++$+++ <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[List of sponsored sports competitions]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sponsored sports competitions]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:Mo ainm|<span style="color:#B22222;font-family:serif;text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''''Mo ainm'''''</span>]][[User talk:Mo ainm|<span style="color:black;font-family:cursive;font-size:80%">~Talk</span>]] 12:25, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
15497 +++$+++ Jarry1250 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15496 +++$+++ 15496 +++$+++ 2010-08-08 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.281328800E09 +++$+++ ''Userfied to [[User:The_C_of_E\/List of sponsored sports competitions]].'' I don't envy your task of trying to dodge that AfD verdict though, I must say. -  +++$+++ :''Userfied to [[User:The_C_of_E/List of sponsored sports competitions]].'' I don't envy your task of trying to dodge that AfD verdict though, I must say. - [[User:Jarry1250|Jarry1250]]&nbsp;<sup>[''[[Special:Contributions/Jarry1250|Humorous]]? [[User_talk:Jarry1250|Discuss]].'']</sup> 21:40, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

15498 +++$+++ Ged UK +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-25 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.282768380E09 +++$+++ Second point is you really, really need to archive your talk page! It's getting rather long now, and older, slower computers might struggle to load it all in a reasonable time. Miszabot archives mine, and is very useful and flexible. [[User:MiszaBot\/Archive HowTo]] has a useful guide on how to set it up. You can, of course, do it manually. Hope you don't mind me suggesting this. Cheers!  +++$+++ Second point is you really, really need to archive your talk page! It's getting rather long now, and older, slower computers might struggle to load it all in a reasonable time. Miszabot archives mine, and is very useful and flexible. [[User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo]] has a useful guide on how to set it up. You can, of course, do it manually. Hope you don't mind me suggesting this. Cheers! [[User:Ged UK|<font color="green">Ged</font>]][[User talk:Ged UK|<font color="orange">'''''UK'''''</font>&nbsp;]] 13:33, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
15499 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15498 +++$+++ 15498 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.282770180E09 +++$+++ Oh yes, sorry. I was meaning to change that but I have a tendency to get distracted  and relativly minor things like this rarely get done. But I hope I've changed it your satisfaction. Now as for the archive thing, I'm not too keen on it mainly because I don't really know what bots do (apart from the bot that does reflinks, a wonderful tool!) and I don't quite trust an automated programme doing something that would be done better by a human on something that can be quite integral to remembering past issues. As for archiving it, I much prefer to have this all in one place rather than split up. So thanks but no thanks for the offer.  +++$+++ :Oh yes, sorry. I was meaning to change that but I have a tendency to get distracted  and relativly minor things like this rarely get done. But I hope I've changed it your satisfaction. Now as for the archive thing, I'm not too keen on it mainly because I don't really know what bots do (apart from the bot that does reflinks, a wonderful tool!) and I don't quite trust an automated programme doing something that would be done better by a human on something that can be quite integral to remembering past issues. As for archiving it, I much prefer to have this all in one place rather than split up. So thanks but no thanks for the offer. [[User:The C of E|The C of E. God Save The Queen!]] ([[User talk:The C of E#top|talk]]) 14:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
15500 +++$+++ Ged UK +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15498 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.282771020E09 +++$+++ Re the archiving, it's your page of course, but all the bot does is check whether there's been no reply to a section in x days\/mins (you define) and then moves it to your archive folder (which you can define). I'm not going to lose sleep over it, just thought I'd mention it in case you weren't sure how to go about requesting the bot. :o)  +++$+++ :::Re the archiving, it's your page of course, but all the bot does is check whether there's been no reply to a section in x days/mins (you define) and then moves it to your archive folder (which you can define). I'm not going to lose sleep over it, just thought I'd mention it in case you weren't sure how to go about requesting the bot. :o) [[User:Ged UK|<font color="green">Ged</font>]][[User talk:Ged UK|<font color="orange">'''''UK'''''</font>&nbsp;]] 14:17, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

264727 +++$+++ 92.20.196.215 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-16 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.258418760E09 +++$+++ And i apologise if im coming across as digging at you, believe me im not at all meaning to - but its sooooo frustrating!!! [[Special:Contributions\/92.20.196.215|92.20.196.215]] ( +++$+++ And i apologise if im coming across as digging at you, believe me im not at all meaning to - but its sooooo frustrating!!! [[Special:Contributions/92.20.196.215|92.20.196.215]] ([[User talk:92.20.196.215|talk]]) 16:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
264728 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ 264727 +++$+++ 264727 +++$+++ 2009-11-16 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.258419120E09 +++$+++ I can appreciate that it is frustrating when people add material that you know to be wrong. Sometimes they are being malicious, sometimes genuinely mistaken. You can report vandals at [[WP:AIV]]. However, there is a lot of articles on Wikipedia that simply shouldn't be here, and there are many, many about WR amongst that. At the moment they do not demonstrate notability by integrating a real-world perspective, with references t0o independent reliable sources. Could you address that? Concentrating upon plot details with be fruitless, as I will merge the articles soon if I don't see improvement.  +++$+++ :I can appreciate that it is frustrating when people add material that you know to be wrong. Sometimes they are being malicious, sometimes genuinely mistaken. You can report vandals at [[WP:AIV]]. However, there is a lot of articles on Wikipedia that simply shouldn't be here, and there are many, many about WR amongst that. At the moment they do not demonstrate notability by integrating a real-world perspective, with references t0o independent reliable sources. Could you address that? Concentrating upon plot details with be fruitless, as I will merge the articles soon if I don't see improvement. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

277645 +++$+++ Bobak +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.206655560E09 +++$+++ In addition to involving more than a single individual, the tactics above fit the [http:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/corrupt definition of corrupt].  For those reasons I disagree with your assertion that my edits are [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABobak&diff=201330391&oldid=201059784 not supported by the source you cite. First, the comment that serves as the source is about a single individual, not the student politics, in general, so a general comment is inappropriate. Secondly, the cited source does not make the assertion that the acts were corrupt, so applying that nomer to the statement represents opinion.]  As such I will revert back to them if they are changed; this is not about whitewashing what is otherwise an exceptional reputation of an era (now historic) student government. -- +++$+++ In addition to involving more than a single individual, the tactics above fit the [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corrupt definition of corrupt].  For those reasons I disagree with your assertion that my edits are [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABobak&diff=201330391&oldid=201059784 not supported by the source you cite. First, the comment that serves as the source is about a single individual, not the student politics, in general, so a general comment is inappropriate. Secondly, the cited source does not make the assertion that the acts were corrupt, so applying that nomer to the statement represents opinion.]  As such I will revert back to them if they are changed; this is not about whitewashing what is otherwise an exceptional reputation of an era (now historic) student government. --[[User:Bobak|Bobak]] ([[User talk:Bobak|talk]]) 15:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
277646 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277645 +++$+++ 277645 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.206668400E09 +++$+++ Also, the definition of corruption is interesting, but again, each reader of the article is left to determine whether they think the actions amount to corruption.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedic journal, not a forum for opinion.  Remember, no [[original research]] and no [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|unverified claims]].  The claim that student politics at USC are corrupt is not verified.  How could it be?  It never appears in the article you cite.  And, the bit about the movie is a red herring, plain and simple.   +++$+++ :Also, the definition of corruption is interesting, but again, each reader of the article is left to determine whether they think the actions amount to corruption.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedic journal, not a forum for opinion.  Remember, no [[original research]] and no [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|unverified claims]].  The claim that student politics at USC are corrupt is not verified.  How could it be?  It never appears in the article you cite.  And, the bit about the movie is a red herring, plain and simple.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 18:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

15503 +++$+++ CountdownCrispy +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-16 09:36:00 +++$+++ 1.284654960E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the good article nomination for [[Razer (robot)]]. I thought I'd follow up on your message on the article's talk page so that it is easier for more users to be involved. Best wishes,  +++$+++ Thank you for the good article nomination for [[Razer (robot)]]. I thought I'd follow up on your message on the article's talk page so that it is easier for more users to be involved. Best wishes, [[User:CountdownCrispy|<span style="color:#556;">'''''Countdown'''''</span><span style="color:#778">'''''Crispy'''''</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:CountdownCrispy|☎]] [[Special:Contributions/CountdownCrispy|✎]]</sup> 09:36, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
15504 +++$+++ CountdownCrispy +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15503 +++$+++ 15503 +++$+++ 2010-09-17 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.284775680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for looking into asking another editor to perform the GA review. I'm not sure of another editor I would be happy to ask at this stage, but I'm glad the option's open if protocol takes ''too'' long! :-) I'll give it a day or two at least, as it is only fair that first come are first served. Please keep me abreast of any further news and developments. Best wishes, <span style=\"border:1px solid #aaaff2; padding:1px\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for looking into asking another editor to perform the GA review. I'm not sure of another editor I would be happy to ask at this stage, but I'm glad the option's open if protocol takes ''too'' long! :-) I'll give it a day or two at least, as it is only fair that first come are first served. Please keep me abreast of any further news and developments. Best wishes, <span style="border:1px solid #aaaff2; padding:1px">[[User:CountdownCrispy|Countdown]]</span><span style="background:#cedff2; border:1px solid #aaaff2; border-left:0; padding:1px">[[User_talk:CountdownCrispy|Crispy]]</span> 19:08, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
15505 +++$+++ CountdownCrispy +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15503 +++$+++ 15504 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.285032060E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, I've messaged [[User:Ged UK|Ged UK]] for now to see if he is interested in conducting the review. I'll do my best to keep you abreast of his response. Best wishes, <span style=\"background:#FFF; border:1px solid #aaaff2; padding:1px\"> +++$+++ ::Just to let you know, I've messaged [[User:Ged UK|Ged UK]] for now to see if he is interested in conducting the review. I'll do my best to keep you abreast of his response. Best wishes, <span style="background:#FFF; border:1px solid #aaaff2; padding:1px">[[User:CountdownCrispy|Countdown]]</span><span style="background:#cedff2; border:1px solid #aaaff2; border-left:0; padding:1px">[[User_talk:CountdownCrispy|Crispy]]</span> 18:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

277649 +++$+++ Iowa13 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-17 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.216279320E09 +++$+++ I realize the wording is a little confusing but the section is titled CONSENSUS national championships.  I can't help but smell some favoritism as well, since you didn't seem too concerned about adding championships for non-USC teams.  +++$+++ I realize the wording is a little confusing but the section is titled CONSENSUS national championships.  I can't help but smell some favoritism as well, since you didn't seem too concerned about adding championships for non-USC teams. [[User:Iowa13|Iowa13]] ([[User talk:Iowa13|talk]]) 00:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
277650 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277649 +++$+++ 277649 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.216676520E09 +++$+++ Maybe if the wording is confusing, we should try to clarify it?  Something strikes me about the value of clear and concise articles.  And, the favortism you smell is fourth generation USC alumni pride, which is not much different than your Iowa favortism.  But, remember, only the article has to reflect NPOV, not the editors.  I have reordered and added to other team's totals (and generally edited for accuracy and clarity) where I could find the research in the public domain, as the history page clearly shows.  +++$+++ :Maybe if the wording is confusing, we should try to clarify it?  Something strikes me about the value of clear and concise articles.  And, the favortism you smell is fourth generation USC alumni pride, which is not much different than your Iowa favortism.  But, remember, only the article has to reflect NPOV, not the editors.  I have reordered and added to other team's totals (and generally edited for accuracy and clarity) where I could find the research in the public domain, as the history page clearly shows. [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 14:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

277651 +++$+++ Iowa13 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277651 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-21 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.216698180E09 +++$+++ Forget the favoritism thing.  I'll try to clarify the wording, but you can't fill in data for a table that is supposed to reflect certain things.  We can discuss the incorporation of the total championships into the table, but that has not yet been brought up.  The way you are going about it right now is unacceptable.  The public domain is not what the table shows.  +++$+++ Forget the favoritism thing.  I'll try to clarify the wording, but you can't fill in data for a table that is supposed to reflect certain things.  We can discuss the incorporation of the total championships into the table, but that has not yet been brought up.  The way you are going about it right now is unacceptable.  The public domain is not what the table shows. [[User:Iowa13|Iowa13]] ([[User talk:Iowa13|talk]]) 20:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
277652 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277651 +++$+++ 277651 +++$+++ 2008-07-23 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.216848720E09 +++$+++ Four things: 1)  Simmer down a bit.  I know you have much pride in the substantial quantity of your edits, but you don't own the article; we all do.  2)  I think clarification is needed, because it is not clear what a \"consensus\" national championship is, at any rate.  Webster's thinks consensus means that everyone agrees.  The fact that everyone does not agree is exactly why there is so much controversy over this subject.  If you truly want to list \"consensus\" NCs (i.e., those where everyone has agreed) the list will be very, very short. 3) The public domain shows USC with 11 national championships, for example, so the table and the public domain are terribly at odds with one another, and 4) I have made a few edits (most to clarify) so I am unsure how you can characterize \"the way I am going\" as unacceptable, which brings me back to point number 1.   +++$+++ :Four things: 1)  Simmer down a bit.  I know you have much pride in the substantial quantity of your edits, but you don't own the article; we all do.  2)  I think clarification is needed, because it is not clear what a "consensus" national championship is, at any rate.  Webster's thinks consensus means that everyone agrees.  The fact that everyone does not agree is exactly why there is so much controversy over this subject.  If you truly want to list "consensus" NCs (i.e., those where everyone has agreed) the list will be very, very short. 3) The public domain shows USC with 11 national championships, for example, so the table and the public domain are terribly at odds with one another, and 4) I have made a few edits (most to clarify) so I am unsure how you can characterize "the way I am going" as unacceptable, which brings me back to point number 1.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 14:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

15508 +++$+++ 87.114.85.253 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15508 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-08 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.286560020E09 +++$+++ It appears that it is an attempt by O Fenian to censor information relating to convicted terrorists and in  particular, the self-confessed former second in command of the RIRA. O Fenian's motives are somewhat obvious since he has consistently edited articles in favour of Republican terrorists. I have no doubt that his conduct is contrary to Wikipedia policy on naming such terrorists given that several reliable sources have been given. --[[Special:Contributions\/87.114.85.253|87.114.85.253]] ( +++$+++ It appears that it is an attempt by O Fenian to censor information relating to convicted terrorists and in  particular, the self-confessed former second in command of the RIRA. O Fenian's motives are somewhat obvious since he has consistently edited articles in favour of Republican terrorists. I have no doubt that his conduct is contrary to Wikipedia policy on naming such terrorists given that several reliable sources have been given. --[[Special:Contributions/87.114.85.253|87.114.85.253]] ([[User talk:87.114.85.253|talk]]) 10:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
15509 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15508 +++$+++ 15508 +++$+++ 2010-10-08 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.286599140E09 +++$+++ Please note that the above ip is a sockpuppet of blocked vandal [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations\/The Maiden City|The Maiden City]]. Any concerns regarding other editors contributions should only be handled according to WP policy and guideline, and not assumed allegiances.  +++$+++ :Please note that the above ip is a sockpuppet of blocked vandal [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Maiden City|The Maiden City]]. Any concerns regarding other editors contributions should only be handled according to WP policy and guideline, and not assumed allegiances. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 21:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

277653 +++$+++ Iowa13 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-23 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.216851540E09 +++$+++ 1. Okay I will.  2. Webster's \"consensus\" is one thing, but \"consensus\" in college football is a fairly commonplace term which is also used in the official record book of FBS football.  The two meanings do clash, and a better term should be used, but it's not, and we're not here to change what has been the norm simply because of a wording thing.  Instead, we can try to clarify the term and remove the confusion.  The consensus national championship is one that is awarded by any number of credible selectors, depending on the year.  For instance, though Nebraska was selected by various sources as champion in 1980-1984, none of these were credible.  The major selectors in those years instead went with Georgia, Clemson, Penn State, Miami, and BYU.  Today there are five consensus selectors (BCS, AP, coaches, FW, NFF), according to the record book, which I should point out is nearly 100% in agreement with nearly 100% of all credible lists.  3. USC's 11 national titles do not come from the public domain, they come from the university, which claims them as such.  They have since entered the public domain, and unfortunately the sports media as well.  But just because something is held true by the public does not give it cause to be included in an encyclopedia.  Until 1992, it was also true in the public eye that Christopher Columbus was a noble, selfless hero, which is not in fact completely true, given his merciless and ruthless slaughter of millions of natives upon arrival in America.  Should an encyclopedia in that time have reflected what the public held true?  I don't think so.  4. Again I apologize for my wording.  There is no problem with the edits, they simply don't reflect the table.  You're only trying to clarify and I also now believe that that needs to be done.  +++$+++ 1. Okay I will.  2. Webster's "consensus" is one thing, but "consensus" in college football is a fairly commonplace term which is also used in the official record book of FBS football.  The two meanings do clash, and a better term should be used, but it's not, and we're not here to change what has been the norm simply because of a wording thing.  Instead, we can try to clarify the term and remove the confusion.  The consensus national championship is one that is awarded by any number of credible selectors, depending on the year.  For instance, though Nebraska was selected by various sources as champion in 1980-1984, none of these were credible.  The major selectors in those years instead went with Georgia, Clemson, Penn State, Miami, and BYU.  Today there are five consensus selectors (BCS, AP, coaches, FW, NFF), according to the record book, which I should point out is nearly 100% in agreement with nearly 100% of all credible lists.  3. USC's 11 national titles do not come from the public domain, they come from the university, which claims them as such.  They have since entered the public domain, and unfortunately the sports media as well.  But just because something is held true by the public does not give it cause to be included in an encyclopedia.  Until 1992, it was also true in the public eye that Christopher Columbus was a noble, selfless hero, which is not in fact completely true, given his merciless and ruthless slaughter of millions of natives upon arrival in America.  Should an encyclopedia in that time have reflected what the public held true?  I don't think so.  4. Again I apologize for my wording.  There is no problem with the edits, they simply don't reflect the table.  You're only trying to clarify and I also now believe that that needs to be done. [[User:Iowa13|Iowa13]] ([[User talk:Iowa13|talk]]) 15:19, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
277654 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277653 +++$+++ 277653 +++$+++ 2008-08-02 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.217727840E09 +++$+++ We have found our \"consensus\" happy place ;)  +++$+++ :We have found our "consensus" happy place ;) [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 18:44, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

277655 +++$+++ 208.191.153.13 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-24 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.224840660E09 +++$+++ Are you the editor in charge of the Texas Rangers article?  [[Special:Contributions\/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ( +++$+++ Are you the editor in charge of the Texas Rangers article?  [[Special:Contributions/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ([[User talk:208.191.153.13|talk]]) 02:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
277656 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277655 +++$+++ 277655 +++$+++ 2008-10-25 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.224958440E09 +++$+++ There are no \"editors-in-charge\" on Wikipedia.  It is an open forum for all to edit as they see fit, so long as one adheres to the rules of the Wiki community.  Also, just so you are aware, it's very bad form to add items to another editor's talk page at the top; please add questions\/comments to the bottom.  Thanks.   +++$+++ :  There are no "editors-in-charge" on Wikipedia.  It is an open forum for all to edit as they see fit, so long as one adheres to the rules of the Wiki community.  Also, just so you are aware, it's very bad form to add items to another editor's talk page at the top; please add questions/comments to the bottom.  Thanks.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 11:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

277657 +++$+++ 208.191.153.13 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-28 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.225183260E09 +++$+++ So, do you want to work with me to correct the errors in the Texas Ranger article, or can you refer me to someone who will? [[Special:Contributions\/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ( +++$+++ So, do you want to work with me to correct the errors in the Texas Ranger article, or can you refer me to someone who will? [[Special:Contributions/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ([[User talk:208.191.153.13|talk]]) 01:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
277658 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277657 +++$+++ 277657 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.225184520E09 +++$+++ I'd be happy to help.  Because Wikipedia is an open forum, anyone is able to make edits.  Sometimes, those edits are clearly childish vandalism, which the Wiki community is usually quick to revert.  Other times, editors (all of us) have a difference of opinion on the substance of an entire article (or parts of it), which we try to work out on the talk pages of the respective article.  And, often, editors have a particular [[WP:POV|point of view]] that they are attempting to advance.  One of the hallmarks of Wikipedia, though, is a [[NPOV|neutral point of view]] similar to an encyclopedia, which is what Wikipedia is all about.  I have found that properly citing any additions, and drawing those additions from reliable sources is the best way to improve articles, which I like to believe is the reason editors participate.  So, let's start with the areas you feel need improvement?   +++$+++ :  I'd be happy to help.  Because Wikipedia is an open forum, anyone is able to make edits.  Sometimes, those edits are clearly childish vandalism, which the Wiki community is usually quick to revert.  Other times, editors (all of us) have a difference of opinion on the substance of an entire article (or parts of it), which we try to work out on the talk pages of the respective article.  And, often, editors have a particular [[WP:POV|point of view]] that they are attempting to advance.  One of the hallmarks of Wikipedia, though, is a [[NPOV|neutral point of view]] similar to an encyclopedia, which is what Wikipedia is all about.  I have found that properly citing any additions, and drawing those additions from reliable sources is the best way to improve articles, which I like to believe is the reason editors participate.  So, let's start with the areas you feel need improvement?  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 02:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

277659 +++$+++ 208.191.153.13 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-28 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.225188600E09 +++$+++ Great, thanks.  The first error is the assertion that SFA \"created\" the rangers.  In fact, the documented referred to was one in which he offered to personally finance an additional ten men to a pre-approved (by mexican authorities) and pre-existing force of fifteen men under the command of moses morrison. additionally, there is no evidence that the ten men referred to by SFA where ever actually recruited or put to work. furthermore, scholars only acknowledge those groups as being a part of the \"ranger tradition\" but do not recognize them as having been \"real\" rangers in the historical sense. they consider them to have been officially formed in 1935. see Robert M. Utley's \"Lone Star Justice: The First Century of the Texas Rangers\" page 15-19. let's start with that. [[Special:Contributions\/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ( +++$+++ Great, thanks.  The first error is the assertion that SFA "created" the rangers.  In fact, the documented referred to was one in which he offered to personally finance an additional ten men to a pre-approved (by mexican authorities) and pre-existing force of fifteen men under the command of moses morrison. additionally, there is no evidence that the ten men referred to by SFA where ever actually recruited or put to work. furthermore, scholars only acknowledge those groups as being a part of the "ranger tradition" but do not recognize them as having been "real" rangers in the historical sense. they consider them to have been officially formed in 1935. see Robert M. Utley's "Lone Star Justice: The First Century of the Texas Rangers" page 15-19. let's start with that. [[Special:Contributions/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ([[User talk:208.191.153.13|talk]]) 03:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
277660 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277659 +++$+++ 277659 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.225192440E09 +++$+++ OK, let me look into the source you cite and I will make the edit, if I agree with your reading.   +++$+++ :  OK, let me look into the source you cite and I will make the edit, if I agree with your reading.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 04:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
277661 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277659 +++$+++ 277659 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.225204080E09 +++$+++ I looked at the reference you cite in Bob Utley's book, as well as accounts of Austin \"forming\" the Rangers in ''The Texas Rangers: A Century of Frontier Defense'', by Walter Prescott Webb (pages 20 and 21), and ''The Texas Rangers: Wearing the Cinco Peso 1821-1900'', by Mike Cox.  Both authors affirm your assertion, as noted in Utley's book.  However, both also confirm that legend and lore point to this event as the first known use of the word \"rangers\" in frontier defense.  As such, they believe it serves as the support for the popular notion that Austin \"unofficially\" formed the Rangers.  I have made a few edits to the article in an attempt to reflect this thinking.  Remember, one of the content guidelines of Wikipedia is not '''necessarily''' (emphasis added) to document the truth (as truth can be subjective), but rather to document those matters that come from [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]].  The general policies of Wikipedia prohibit [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]].  Hope this helps; it can be frustrating for those in academia.  +++$+++ :  I looked at the reference you cite in Bob Utley's book, as well as accounts of Austin "forming" the Rangers in ''The Texas Rangers: A Century of Frontier Defense'', by Walter Prescott Webb (pages 20 and 21), and ''The Texas Rangers: Wearing the Cinco Peso 1821-1900'', by Mike Cox.  Both authors affirm your assertion, as noted in Utley's book.  However, both also confirm that legend and lore point to this event as the first known use of the word "rangers" in frontier defense.  As such, they believe it serves as the support for the popular notion that Austin "unofficially" formed the Rangers.  I have made a few edits to the article in an attempt to reflect this thinking.  Remember, one of the content guidelines of Wikipedia is not '''necessarily''' (emphasis added) to document the truth (as truth can be subjective), but rather to document those matters that come from [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]].  The general policies of Wikipedia prohibit [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]].  Hope this helps; it can be frustrating for those in academia. [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 07:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

277662 +++$+++ 208.191.153.13 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277662 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-28 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.225188960E09 +++$+++ Also, what is the source for the statement \"...they are legally protected against disbandment.\"? [[Special:Contributions\/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ([[User talk:208.191.153.13|talk]]) 03:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC) [[Special:Contributions\/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ( +++$+++ Also, what is the source for the statement "...they are legally protected against disbandment."? [[Special:Contributions/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ([[User talk:208.191.153.13|talk]]) 03:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC) [[Special:Contributions/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ([[User talk:208.191.153.13|talk]]) 03:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
277663 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277662 +++$+++ 277662 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.225192440E09 +++$+++ The historical importance and symbolism of the Texas Rangers is such that they are protected by statute from being disbanded.  Under Texas Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 147, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987, \"The division relating to the Texas Rangers may not be abolished.\"  See http:\/\/www.texasranger.org\/today\/abolishment.htm   +++$+++ :The historical importance and symbolism of the Texas Rangers is such that they are protected by statute from being disbanded.  Under Texas Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 147, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987, "The division relating to the Texas Rangers may not be abolished."  See http://www.texasranger.org/today/abolishment.htm  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 04:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

539808 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539808 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-21 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.277112000E09 +++$+++ Thank you! Yeah, I don't think I'm going to get the DYK, but who cares. I just learned a lot today from Materialscientist about how to reference. Perks of bringing things to DYK: have people look into your articles. I really don't want to give blocks of citations to bring it to another 1000 characters, because it would ruin my article. The point is that this Meksi was COMPLETELY forgotten by the communist regime, so no one wrote anything decent about him, while we have so many biographies of people who counted less than him. I mean he IS the author of the translation, everyone who endeavored after him, like [[Kostandin Kristoforidhi]] just partially copied his work. He started from scratch. Who is the modern Bulgarian translator of the Bible? It seems like they worked at the same time. --<sub><span style=\"border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Thank you! Yeah, I don't think I'm going to get the DYK, but who cares. I just learned a lot today from Materialscientist about how to reference. Perks of bringing things to DYK: have people look into your articles. I really don't want to give blocks of citations to bring it to another 1000 characters, because it would ruin my article. The point is that this Meksi was COMPLETELY forgotten by the communist regime, so no one wrote anything decent about him, while we have so many biographies of people who counted less than him. I mean he IS the author of the translation, everyone who endeavored after him, like [[Kostandin Kristoforidhi]] just partially copied his work. He started from scratch. Who is the modern Bulgarian translator of the Bible? It seems like they worked at the same time. --<sub><span style="border:1.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sulmues#top|<font style = "color:white;background:navy;">'''Sulmues'''</font>]]</span></sub><sup><small>[[User_talk:Sulmues|<font color="green"> Let's talk </font>]]</small></sup> 02:20, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
539809 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539808 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-21 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.277127720E09 +++$+++ As for the Bulgarian translation, the first was by Theodoius, abbot of the Bistritsa Monastery in Romania, though it was not very good. The 1838 translation by Neofit Rilski had more success. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ :: As for the Bulgarian translation, the first was by Theodoius, abbot of the Bistritsa Monastery in Romania, though it was not very good. The 1838 translation by Neofit Rilski had more success. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 06:42, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

87393 +++$+++ Michael Hardy +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-15 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.242449100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 21:45, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
87394 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87393 +++$+++ 87393 +++$+++ 2009-05-15 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.242450720E09 +++$+++ Thanks Michael. German grammar is certainly not my strong point.  +++$+++ :Thanks Michael. German grammar is certainly not my strong point. [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 22:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

277666 +++$+++ Bcspro +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-24 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.227578940E09 +++$+++ My bad, when I reverted the Big 12 edit, I did not see I was reverting the Pac-10 edit also. My apoligies.  +++$+++ My bad, when I reverted the Big 12 edit, I did not see I was reverting the Pac-10 edit also. My apoligies. [[User:Bcspro|Bcspro]] ([[User talk:Bcspro|talk]]) 18:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
277667 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277666 +++$+++ 277666 +++$+++ 2008-11-24 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.227579840E09 +++$+++ No worries.  Thanks.   +++$+++ :No worries.  Thanks.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 18:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
277668 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277666 +++$+++ 277666 +++$+++ 2008-12-03 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.228309380E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks.   +++$+++ :OK, thanks.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 05:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

15523 +++$+++ MickMacNee +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-09 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.299733740E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[The Avenue]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|The Avenue|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->   +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[The Avenue]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|The Avenue|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  [[User:MickMacNee|MickMacNee]] ([[User talk:MickMacNee|talk]]) 21:09, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
15524 +++$+++ Maile66 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15523 +++$+++ 15523 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.301085780E09 +++$+++ It got re-reviewed today.  +++$+++ :It got re-reviewed today. [[User:Maile66|Maile66]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 13:43, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

277669 +++$+++ Tomtom9041 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-04 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.228389780E09 +++$+++ It is an encylopedia article not a history book, try KISS (keep it Short and Sweet)-- +++$+++ It is an encylopedia article not a history book, try KISS (keep it Short and Sweet)--[[User:Tomtom9041|Tomtom9041]] ([[User talk:Tomtom9041|talk]]) 03:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
277670 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277669 +++$+++ 277669 +++$+++ 2008-12-04 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.228389960E09 +++$+++ That's what I am trying to do.  Keep in mind, though, the article (in its current format) has been a [[Wikipedia:Featured articles|featured article]] for a while now.  +++$+++ :That's what I am trying to do.  Keep in mind, though, the article (in its current format) has been a [[Wikipedia:Featured articles|featured article]] for a while now. [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 03:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

15526 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.300926180E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Follow On (hymn)]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Follow On (hymn)|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> -- +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Follow On (hymn)]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Follow On (hymn)|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> --[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 17:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
15527 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15526 +++$+++ 15526 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.301965200E09 +++$+++ See [[WT:Did you know#Follow On (hymn)]].  +++$+++ :See [[WT:Did you know#Follow On (hymn)]]. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 18:00, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

277671 +++$+++ Wildhartlivie +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-08 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.228785420E09 +++$+++ It was removed in a series of removals because an SPA has been spamming the links to various pages.  +++$+++ It was removed in a series of removals because an SPA has been spamming the links to various pages. [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 17:17, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
277672 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277671 +++$+++ 277671 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.228786080E09 +++$+++ Got it.  Good catch, then.   +++$+++ :Got it.  Good catch, then.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 17:28, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
277673 +++$+++ Wildhartlivie +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277671 +++$+++ 277672 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.228786860E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure that it is necessary at this point. Time will tell, though.  +++$+++ ::I'm not sure that it is necessary at this point. Time will tell, though. [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 17:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

445698 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445698 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.310202300E09 +++$+++ If you have something to say to me, let's do it in a new section below, or on your talk page, whichever is more convenient for you, but not [[User:Dismas]]'s talk page. My bad for responding to you there.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ If you have something to say to me, let's do it in a new section below, or on your talk page, whichever is more convenient for you, but not [[User:Dismas]]'s talk page. My bad for responding to you there.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 02:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
445699 +++$+++ Since 10.28.2010 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445698 +++$+++ 445698 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310202480E09 +++$+++ Let's talk here. Is there really a need to do that? \u201cI don't think you can [satisfy criteria]\u201d? \u201cnothing\u201d?  +++$+++ :Let's talk here. Is there really a need to do that? “I don't think you can [satisfy criteria]”? “nothing”? [[User:Since 10.28.2010| A person who has been editing Wikipedia since October 28, 2010.]] ([[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|talk]]) 02:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
445700 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445698 +++$+++ 445699 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310202780E09 +++$+++ I explained \"\u201cI don't think you can [satisfy criteria]\u201d?\" at [[Talk:Bay_Area_Rapid_Transit#The_current_route_map_could_be_misleading_to_some.]]. If you still don't understand my point, I've found it helpful to ask the other person to explain what they think they heard, so we can iron out any misunderstanding. However, I had an edit conflict there, so I don't think you've read it yet. As for \"nothing\" that's short for \"nothing to see here\", but when I see that phrase, it is almost like a traffic accident, some people feel the need to look so I abbreviated it. Does that make sense? Based on your comment, you were just feeling silly, which is fine, but I have a lot of talk page watchers, and I didn't want them wondering what was going on.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::I explained "“I don't think you can [satisfy criteria]”?" at [[Talk:Bay_Area_Rapid_Transit#The_current_route_map_could_be_misleading_to_some.]]. If you still don't understand my point, I've found it helpful to ask the other person to explain what they think they heard, so we can iron out any misunderstanding. However, I had an edit conflict there, so I don't think you've read it yet. As for "nothing" that's short for "nothing to see here", but when I see that phrase, it is almost like a traffic accident, some people feel the need to look so I abbreviated it. Does that make sense? Based on your comment, you were just feeling silly, which is fine, but I have a lot of talk page watchers, and I didn't want them wondering what was going on.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 02:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
445701 +++$+++ Since 10.28.2010 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445698 +++$+++ 445700 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.310203140E09 +++$+++ Whoa, excuse me? \u201cyou were just feeling silly\u201d? I know that you're trying to \u201ciron out any misunderstanding\u201d, but I was not feeling silly, and I, think it is silly, that you, thought that '''I''' was silly? You pretty much nullified your previous statement. Please see [[Talk:Bay Area Rapid Transit#File:BART Map.png]]. regard  +++$+++ :::Whoa, excuse me? “you were just feeling silly”? I know that you're trying to “iron out any misunderstanding”, but I was not feeling silly, and I, think it is silly, that you, thought that '''I''' was silly? You pretty much nullified your previous statement. Please see [[Talk:Bay Area Rapid Transit#File:BART Map.png]]. regard [[User:Since 10.28.2010| A person who has been editing Wikipedia since October 28, 2010.]] ([[User talk:Since 10.28.2010|talk]]) 02:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
445702 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445698 +++$+++ 445701 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.310203380E09 +++$+++ Huh, you weren't just feeling silly? What on earth does \"i just felt like it\" mean then? Were you seriously trouting me without an explanation? I AGF'd and assumed you were making a joke. If not, please explain yourself.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::::Huh, you weren't just feeling silly? What on earth does "i just felt like it" mean then? Were you seriously trouting me without an explanation? I AGF'd and assumed you were making a joke. If not, please explain yourself.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 02:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

277675 +++$+++ SheffieldSteel +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-16 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.229475960E09 +++$+++ You should know that articles related to [[Barack Obama]] are under article probation, and that higher standards are expected of editors than elsewhere on Wikipedia. For more information, please read [[Talk:Barack Obama\/Article probation]].  <font color=\"006622\"> +++$+++ You should know that articles related to [[Barack Obama]] are under article probation, and that higher standards are expected of editors than elsewhere on Wikipedia. For more information, please read [[Talk:Barack Obama/Article probation]].  <font color="006622">[[User:SheffieldSteel|S<small>HEFFIELD</small>S<small>TEEL</small>]]</font><sup><small><b>[[User_talk:SheffieldSteel|TALK]]</b></small></sup> 17:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
277676 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277675 +++$+++ 277675 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.229476080E09 +++$+++ Ok, and your point is??  +++$+++ :  Ok, and your point is?? [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 17:08, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
277677 +++$+++ SheffieldSteel +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277675 +++$+++ 277676 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.229476800E09 +++$+++ Please read [[WP:Neutral point of view]] and [[WP:Words to avoid]] for full details. The first clause of your first edit (\"''Despite his inability to quit smoking, Obama has said he will not smoke in the White House''\") amounted to editorialising and wasn't supported by the article. Your second edit (reverted by another user) added \"''Although failing to give a straight answer when asked whether he has managed to quit smoking''\". While that is a quote from the source, it presents an opinion (a viewpoint held by the source) as a fact, which is contrary to [[WP:NPOV]]. In general it is a bad idea to try to add material to [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] that might be seen as a way to make them look bad, unless your desired change is very well supported by very [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. In this particular case, since the article is under probation, you should join the dicussion at the Talk page and try to reach [[WP:Consensus|consensus]] for any changes.  <font color=\"006622\"> +++$+++ ::Please read [[WP:Neutral point of view]] and [[WP:Words to avoid]] for full details. The first clause of your first edit ("''Despite his inability to quit smoking, Obama has said he will not smoke in the White House''") amounted to editorialising and wasn't supported by the article. Your second edit (reverted by another user) added "''Although failing to give a straight answer when asked whether he has managed to quit smoking''". While that is a quote from the source, it presents an opinion (a viewpoint held by the source) as a fact, which is contrary to [[WP:NPOV]]. In general it is a bad idea to try to add material to [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] that might be seen as a way to make them look bad, unless your desired change is very well supported by very [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. In this particular case, since the article is under probation, you should join the dicussion at the Talk page and try to reach [[WP:Consensus|consensus]] for any changes.  <font color="006622">[[User:SheffieldSteel|S<small>HEFFIELD</small>S<small>TEEL</small>]]</font><sup><small><b>[[User_talk:SheffieldSteel|TALK]]</b></small></sup> 17:20, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
277678 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277675 +++$+++ 277677 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.229477040E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, although I wasn't trying to make him look bad because he is a smoker.  Us cigar smokers could use a bit of support in the White House.  I was really just trying to find an adequate transitional phrase.  Perhaps I should have thought through how NPOV would negatively impact the ability to use good grammar, and improve readability?  +++$+++ :::Fair enough, although I wasn't trying to make him look bad because he is a smoker.  Us cigar smokers could use a bit of support in the White House.  I was really just trying to find an adequate transitional phrase.  Perhaps I should have thought through how NPOV would negatively impact the ability to use good grammar, and improve readability? [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 17:24, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

15533 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15533 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-17 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.303083120E09 +++$+++ Hi, How about [[Last Supper in Christian art]] for [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_April_17|Thursday dyk]]? Cheers.  +++$+++ Hi, How about [[Last Supper in Christian art]] for [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_April_17|Thursday dyk]]? Cheers. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 16:32, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
15534 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15533 +++$+++ 15533 +++$+++ 2011-04-17 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.303087740E09 +++$+++ Hi, Thanks for your attention. Fixed it as you suggested. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Hi, Thanks for your attention. Fixed it as you suggested. Cheers. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 17:49, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
15535 +++$+++ History2007 +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15533 +++$+++ 15534 +++$+++ 2011-04-17 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.303088460E09 +++$+++ Great, the timing should just work out fine. Thank you.  +++$+++ ::Great, the timing should just work out fine. Thank you. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 18:01, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

277679 +++$+++ 208.191.153.13 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-24 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.224840660E09 +++$+++ Are you the editor in charge of the Texas Rangers article?  [[Special:Contributions\/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ( +++$+++ Are you the editor in charge of the Texas Rangers article?  [[Special:Contributions/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ([[User talk:208.191.153.13|talk]]) 02:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
277680 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277679 +++$+++ 277679 +++$+++ 2008-10-25 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.224958440E09 +++$+++ There are no \"editors-in-charge\" on Wikipedia.  It is an open forum for all to edit as they see fit, so long as one adheres to the rules of the Wiki community.  Also, just so you are aware, it's very bad form to add items to another editor's talk page at the top; please add questions\/comments to the bottom.  Thanks.   +++$+++ :  There are no "editors-in-charge" on Wikipedia.  It is an open forum for all to edit as they see fit, so long as one adheres to the rules of the Wiki community.  Also, just so you are aware, it's very bad form to add items to another editor's talk page at the top; please add questions/comments to the bottom.  Thanks.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 11:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

611550 +++$+++ Suit-n-tie +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-12 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.158050880E09 +++$+++ About that picture, I got it at [http:\/\/www.pojo.com\/Dragonball Pojo.com]. That's it, I'm sure. --[[User:Suit-n-tie|<font color=\"blue\">'''Suit-n-t'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ About that picture, I got it at [http://www.pojo.com/Dragonball Pojo.com]. That's it, I'm sure. --[[User:Suit-n-tie|<font color="blue">'''Suit-n-t'''</font>]][[User:Suit-n-tie/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''e'''</font>]] 01:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
611551 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611550 +++$+++ 611550 +++$+++ 2006-09-12 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.158085440E09 +++$+++ I think you may be confusing me with someone else. I've never made an edit on your page. [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color=\"blue\">'''Sasuk'''<\/font>]][[User:Sasuke-kun27\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">'''e'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ :I think you may be confusing me with someone else. I've never made an edit on your page. [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuk'''</font>]][[User:Sasuke-kun27/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''e'''</font>]][[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 11:24, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

277681 +++$+++ 208.191.153.13 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-28 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.225183260E09 +++$+++ So, do you want to work with me to correct the errors in the Texas Ranger article, or can you refer me to someone who will? [[Special:Contributions\/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ( +++$+++ So, do you want to work with me to correct the errors in the Texas Ranger article, or can you refer me to someone who will? [[Special:Contributions/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ([[User talk:208.191.153.13|talk]]) 01:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
277682 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277681 +++$+++ 277681 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.225184520E09 +++$+++ I'd be happy to help.  Because Wikipedia is an open forum, anyone is able to make edits.  Sometimes, those edits are clearly childish vandalism, which the Wiki community is usually quick to revert.  Other times, editors (all of us) have a difference of opinion on the substance of an entire article (or parts of it), which we try to work out on the talk pages of the respective article.  And, often, editors have a particular [[WP:POV|point of view]] that they are attempting to advance.  One of the hallmarks of Wikipedia, though, is a [[NPOV|neutral point of view]] similar to an encyclopedia, which is what Wikipedia is all about.  I have found that properly citing any additions, and drawing those additions from reliable sources is the best way to improve articles, which I like to believe is the reason editors participate.  So, let's start with the areas you feel need improvement?   +++$+++ :  I'd be happy to help.  Because Wikipedia is an open forum, anyone is able to make edits.  Sometimes, those edits are clearly childish vandalism, which the Wiki community is usually quick to revert.  Other times, editors (all of us) have a difference of opinion on the substance of an entire article (or parts of it), which we try to work out on the talk pages of the respective article.  And, often, editors have a particular [[WP:POV|point of view]] that they are attempting to advance.  One of the hallmarks of Wikipedia, though, is a [[NPOV|neutral point of view]] similar to an encyclopedia, which is what Wikipedia is all about.  I have found that properly citing any additions, and drawing those additions from reliable sources is the best way to improve articles, which I like to believe is the reason editors participate.  So, let's start with the areas you feel need improvement?  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 02:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

277683 +++$+++ 208.191.153.13 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-28 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.225188600E09 +++$+++ Great, thanks.  The first error is the assertion that SFA \"created\" the rangers.  In fact, the documented referred to was one in which he offered to personally finance an additional ten men to a pre-approved (by mexican authorities) and pre-existing force of fifteen men under the command of moses morrison. additionally, there is no evidence that the ten men referred to by SFA where ever actually recruited or put to work. furthermore, scholars only acknowledge those groups as being a part of the \"ranger tradition\" but do not recognize them as having been \"real\" rangers in the historical sense. they consider them to have been officially formed in 1935. see Robert M. Utley's \"Lone Star Justice: The First Century of the Texas Rangers\" page 15-19. let's start with that. [[Special:Contributions\/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ( +++$+++ Great, thanks.  The first error is the assertion that SFA "created" the rangers.  In fact, the documented referred to was one in which he offered to personally finance an additional ten men to a pre-approved (by mexican authorities) and pre-existing force of fifteen men under the command of moses morrison. additionally, there is no evidence that the ten men referred to by SFA where ever actually recruited or put to work. furthermore, scholars only acknowledge those groups as being a part of the "ranger tradition" but do not recognize them as having been "real" rangers in the historical sense. they consider them to have been officially formed in 1935. see Robert M. Utley's "Lone Star Justice: The First Century of the Texas Rangers" page 15-19. let's start with that. [[Special:Contributions/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ([[User talk:208.191.153.13|talk]]) 03:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
277684 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277683 +++$+++ 277683 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.225192440E09 +++$+++ OK, let me look into the source you cite and I will make the edit, if I agree with your reading.   +++$+++ :  OK, let me look into the source you cite and I will make the edit, if I agree with your reading.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 04:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
277685 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277683 +++$+++ 277683 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.225204080E09 +++$+++ I looked at the reference you cite in Bob Utley's book, as well as accounts of Austin \"forming\" the Rangers in ''The Texas Rangers: A Century of Frontier Defense'', by Walter Prescott Webb (pages 20 and 21), and ''The Texas Rangers: Wearing the Cinco Peso 1821-1900'', by Mike Cox.  Both authors affirm your assertion, as noted in Utley's book.  However, both also confirm that legend and lore point to this event as the first known use of the word \"rangers\" in frontier defense.  As such, they believe it serves as the support for the popular notion that Austin \"unofficially\" formed the Rangers.  I have made a few edits to the article in an attempt to reflect this thinking.  Remember, one of the content guidelines of Wikipedia is not '''necessarily''' (emphasis added) to document the truth (as truth can be subjective), but rather to document those matters that come from [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]].  The general policies of Wikipedia prohibit [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]].  Hope this helps; it can be frustrating for those in academia.  +++$+++ :  I looked at the reference you cite in Bob Utley's book, as well as accounts of Austin "forming" the Rangers in ''The Texas Rangers: A Century of Frontier Defense'', by Walter Prescott Webb (pages 20 and 21), and ''The Texas Rangers: Wearing the Cinco Peso 1821-1900'', by Mike Cox.  Both authors affirm your assertion, as noted in Utley's book.  However, both also confirm that legend and lore point to this event as the first known use of the word "rangers" in frontier defense.  As such, they believe it serves as the support for the popular notion that Austin "unofficially" formed the Rangers.  I have made a few edits to the article in an attempt to reflect this thinking.  Remember, one of the content guidelines of Wikipedia is not '''necessarily''' (emphasis added) to document the truth (as truth can be subjective), but rather to document those matters that come from [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]].  The general policies of Wikipedia prohibit [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]].  Hope this helps; it can be frustrating for those in academia. [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 07:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

15541 +++$+++ Softlavender +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-08 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.304842620E09 +++$+++ Since after four days it hasn't been fixed, let's file a bug report: [[Wikipedia:Bug reports and feature requests]]. Looks like the only way to get it prioritized and fixed is to file bug reports. Thanks.  +++$+++ Since after four days it hasn't been fixed, let's file a bug report: [[Wikipedia:Bug reports and feature requests]]. Looks like the only way to get it prioritized and fixed is to file bug reports. Thanks. [[User:Softlavender|Softlavender]] ([[User talk:Softlavender|talk]]) 01:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
15542 +++$+++ Softlavender +++$+++ The C of E +++$+++ 15541 +++$+++ 15541 +++$+++ 2011-05-08 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.304875860E09 +++$+++ The problem has cleared up for me, but if it hasn't for you or if it recurs: You can either start with the link I provided above, or go straight to https:\/\/bugzilla.wikimedia.org\/enter_bug.cgi. Set up an account if you don't have one (simple), and then choose MediaWiki as your product to report on. On the resulting scroll menus chose History\/Diffs as the component; unspecified as the version; major or critical as the severity; PC (or Mac, etc.) as your hardware, and whatever OS you are on (Windows XP, etc.) for that. Then create a subject title and explain the problem and also how difficult it makes working on Wikipedia. Then  just click \"Submit\".  +++$+++ :The problem has cleared up for me, but if it hasn't for you or if it recurs: You can either start with the link I provided above, or go straight to https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi. Set up an account if you don't have one (simple), and then choose MediaWiki as your product to report on. On the resulting scroll menus chose History/Diffs as the component; unspecified as the version; major or critical as the severity; PC (or Mac, etc.) as your hardware, and whatever OS you are on (Windows XP, etc.) for that. Then create a subject title and explain the problem and also how difficult it makes working on Wikipedia. Then  just click "Submit". [[User:Softlavender|Softlavender]] ([[User talk:Softlavender|talk]]) 10:31, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

277686 +++$+++ 208.191.153.13 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-28 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.225188960E09 +++$+++ Also, what is the source for the statement \"...they are legally protected against disbandment.\"? [[Special:Contributions\/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ([[User talk:208.191.153.13|talk]]) 03:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC) [[Special:Contributions\/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ( +++$+++ Also, what is the source for the statement "...they are legally protected against disbandment."? [[Special:Contributions/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ([[User talk:208.191.153.13|talk]]) 03:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC) [[Special:Contributions/208.191.153.13|208.191.153.13]] ([[User talk:208.191.153.13|talk]]) 03:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
277687 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277686 +++$+++ 277686 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.225192440E09 +++$+++ The historical importance and symbolism of the Texas Rangers is such that they are protected by statute from being disbanded.  Under Texas Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 147, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987, \"The division relating to the Texas Rangers may not be abolished.\"  See http:\/\/www.texasranger.org\/today\/abolishment.htm   +++$+++ :The historical importance and symbolism of the Texas Rangers is such that they are protected by statute from being disbanded.  Under Texas Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 147, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987, "The division relating to the Texas Rangers may not be abolished."  See http://www.texasranger.org/today/abolishment.htm  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 04:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

539833 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-27 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.280267460E09 +++$+++ Todor, my apologies for being insistent, but did you by any chance miss [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:TodorBozhinov&diff=375140434&oldid=375051649 this message] of mine? If so, [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_July_20|here]] is the link again - for [[Mik\xf3 Citadel]]. And about the 5-day thing: see [[Wikipedia:Did_you_know\/Additional_rules#Other_additional_rules_for_the_article|here]], point D9. Technically it's 5 days, but in reality, it's 8-10 days, hence all those proposals in the \"Older nominations\" section. Thanks again! -  +++$+++ Todor, my apologies for being insistent, but did you by any chance miss [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TodorBozhinov&diff=375140434&oldid=375051649 this message] of mine? If so, [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_July_20|here]] is the link again - for [[Mikó Citadel]]. And about the 5-day thing: see [[Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Additional_rules#Other_additional_rules_for_the_article|here]], point D9. Technically it's 5 days, but in reality, it's 8-10 days, hence all those proposals in the "Older nominations" section. Thanks again! - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 14:51, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
539834 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539833 +++$+++ 539833 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.280268300E09 +++$+++ Indeed, I missed it for some reason (probably two unread messages and only saw the more recent one). Apologies. I have now verified the article, it was clearly ready for DYK. Best, ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : Indeed, I missed it for some reason (probably two unread messages and only saw the more recent one). Apologies. I have now verified the article, it was clearly ready for DYK. Best, ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 15:05, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

277690 +++$+++ Buaidh +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-20 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.232498220E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.denverpost.com\/news\/ci_11494154 Salazar expects to be confirmed today]  -- +++$+++ [http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_11494154 Salazar expects to be confirmed today]  --[[User:Buaidh|Buaidh]] ([[User talk:Buaidh|talk]]) 16:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
277691 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277690 +++$+++ 277690 +++$+++ 2009-01-20 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.232498400E09 +++$+++ But, he has not yet been confirmed.  Wiki does not predict the future or what is expected to happen, only what does happen.  Let's just wait a bit for it to be official?  Thanks.  +++$+++ :But, he has not yet been confirmed.  Wiki does not predict the future or what is expected to happen, only what does happen.  Let's just wait a bit for it to be official?  Thanks. [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 16:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
277692 +++$+++ Buaidh +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277690 +++$+++ 277691 +++$+++ 2009-01-20 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.232498640E09 +++$+++ I'm prescient.  Why aren't you, earthman?  -- +++$+++ ::I'm prescient.  Why aren't you, earthman?  --[[User:Buaidh|Buaidh]] ([[User talk:Buaidh|talk]]) 16:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
277693 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277690 +++$+++ 277692 +++$+++ 2009-01-20 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.232498880E09 +++$+++ I don't beg for anything, not even for the question.  +++$+++ :::I don't beg for anything, not even for the question. [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 16:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
277694 +++$+++ Buaidh +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277690 +++$+++ 277693 +++$+++ 2009-01-20 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.232521200E09 +++$+++ How about now?  [http:\/\/www.google.com\/hostednews\/ap\/article\/ALeqM5hi6r-WMKkf2LwqPLQN0PhNMabNmgD95R59EG0 Senate confirms 6 cabinet secretaries]  -- +++$+++ ::::How about now?  [http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hi6r-WMKkf2LwqPLQN0PhNMabNmgD95R59EG0 Senate confirms 6 cabinet secretaries]  --[[User:Buaidh|Buaidh]] ([[User talk:Buaidh|talk]]) 23:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
277695 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277690 +++$+++ 277694 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.232579460E09 +++$+++ Now that history has been made, Wiki can chronicle.   +++$+++ :::::Now that history has been made, Wiki can chronicle.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 15:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

323492 +++$+++ Refdoc +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ 323492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-11 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.110562680E09 +++$+++ I am not endorsing anything. Anything east of the Ganges is of and west of the Atlantic is of complete and utter irrelevance to me. I did not even read the article, nor do I intend to. I am here solely to ensure compliance with the [[WP:3RR|3RR]] rules.Both of you violated and both of you were warned. I have absolutely no problem with you or Instantnood to continue editing. I would encourage this actually. What I do not encourage is to do clever games trying to subvert the [[WP:3RR|3RR]] rule. Normally there is always a solution possible between two adults. If you think there is no solution possible, please do a RfC on the ''article'', not on each other. Remember, not everything what you believe to be true, would be recognised by others equally as true, subsequently we are striving to an NPOV which acknowledges different POVs.  +++$+++ I am not endorsing anything. Anything east of the Ganges is of and west of the Atlantic is of complete and utter irrelevance to me. I did not even read the article, nor do I intend to. I am here solely to ensure compliance with the [[WP:3RR|3RR]] rules.Both of you violated and both of you were warned. I have absolutely no problem with you or Instantnood to continue editing. I would encourage this actually. What I do not encourage is to do clever games trying to subvert the [[WP:3RR|3RR]] rule. Normally there is always a solution possible between two adults. If you think there is no solution possible, please do a RfC on the ''article'', not on each other. Remember, not everything what you believe to be true, would be recognised by others equally as true, subsequently we are striving to an NPOV which acknowledges different POVs. [[User:Refdoc|Refdoc]] 09:38, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
323493 +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ 323492 +++$+++ 323492 +++$+++ 2005-03-11 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.110564660E09 +++$+++ I am more then aware that my views are just that...my views. They are not neccesarily true, nor are they representative. The issue I have with the above is the '''lack''' of discussion and concensus before changes are made, and I am still unfamiliar with the full range of tools open to me when trying to come to a resolution in disagreements, other then the typical talkpages and so on. I apologise for that handicap.-- +++$+++ :I am more then aware that my views are just that...my views. They are not neccesarily true, nor are they representative. The issue I have with the above is the '''lack''' of discussion and concensus before changes are made, and I am still unfamiliar with the full range of tools open to me when trying to come to a resolution in disagreements, other then the typical talkpages and so on. I apologise for that handicap.--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 10:11, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

15551 +++$+++ Fernando Buceta +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15551 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-03 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.207245000E09 +++$+++ Here's a [[Sakotis]] for you! This cake promotes [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving this cake to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing!  +++$+++ Here's a [[Sakotis]] for you! This cake promotes [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving this cake to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! [[User:Fernando Buceta|Fernando Buceta]] ([[User talk:Fernando Buceta|talk]]) 10:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
15552 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15551 +++$+++ 15551 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.283244060E09 +++$+++ Please be aware that [[User:Arctic2012]] is a [[:WP:SPA|single purpose account]] who may be Bill Thomas, or apparently at least his agent (in some sense of the term). -- +++$+++ :Please be aware that [[User:Arctic2012]] is a [[:WP:SPA|single purpose account]] who may be Bill Thomas, or apparently at least his agent (in some sense of the term). --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  &#x007C;  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 01:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

277696 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277696 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-21 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.232585400E09 +++$+++ Please comment on the article, not the editor. I consider [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ABarack_Obama&diff=265506010&oldid=265495103 this edit] to be a personal attack, but I'll happily take the bait on your talk page. There is no reasonable justification for regular citizens owning assault weapons. ''None whatsoever.'' Obama has repeatedly stated that he has no problem with the Second Amendment provide it does not put weapons in the hands of children and criminals. He has also (quite reasonably and sensibly) stated he would like to see the reinstatement of the Assault Weapons Ban. --  +++$+++ Please comment on the article, not the editor. I consider [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABarack_Obama&diff=265506010&oldid=265495103 this edit] to be a personal attack, but I'll happily take the bait on your talk page. There is no reasonable justification for regular citizens owning assault weapons. ''None whatsoever.'' Obama has repeatedly stated that he has no problem with the Second Amendment provide it does not put weapons in the hands of children and criminals. He has also (quite reasonably and sensibly) stated he would like to see the reinstatement of the Assault Weapons Ban. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 16:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277697 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277696 +++$+++ 277696 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.232586060E09 +++$+++ You mistake my [[sarcasm]] for a personal attack, which it clearly is not.  Simmer down with, now, the second \"quit picking on me\" attempt at portraying my comments as a personal attack.  That one does not agree with another does not a personal attack make.  Now, to your opinion, it is just that, your opinion.  I believe there are ''many'' justifications for law-abiding \"regular\" (as opposed to irregular?) citizens owning assault rifles: a) it is the exercise of a right granted to all citizens under the US Constitution, b) the lawful use of assault weapons protects life and personal property, and c) lawfully shooting assault weapons is fun, and therefore is also an exercise of my rights to \"...the pursuit of happiness\" guaranteed by the US Constitution.  Class over.  +++$+++ :You mistake my [[sarcasm]] for a personal attack, which it clearly is not.  Simmer down with, now, the second "quit picking on me" attempt at portraying my comments as a personal attack.  That one does not agree with another does not a personal attack make.  Now, to your opinion, it is just that, your opinion.  I believe there are ''many'' justifications for law-abiding "regular" (as opposed to irregular?) citizens owning assault rifles: a) it is the exercise of a right granted to all citizens under the US Constitution, b) the lawful use of assault weapons protects life and personal property, and c) lawfully shooting assault weapons is fun, and therefore is also an exercise of my rights to "...the pursuit of happiness" guaranteed by the US Constitution.  Class over. [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 17:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277698 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277696 +++$+++ 277697 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.232588760E09 +++$+++ I agree that shooting guns is fun; however, \"the pursuit of happiness\" is ''not'' guaranteed by the Constitution. It is part of the Declaration of Independence. There is nothing in the Second Amendment about \"assault rifles\", and if you are suggesting that the existing wording is sufficient to cover them then we can also add tanks, intercontinental ballistic missiles and orbiting laser platforms. As to (b), there is nothing specific in the Second Amendment about defending life or property. The wording vaguely refers to ensuring \"the security of a free State\", which is more about protecting the nation (either from aggressors, or from itself). You are correct in stating that \"class is over\", insofar in that I cannot learn anything useful from you. --  +++$+++ ::I agree that shooting guns is fun; however, "the pursuit of happiness" is ''not'' guaranteed by the Constitution. It is part of the Declaration of Independence. There is nothing in the Second Amendment about "assault rifles", and if you are suggesting that the existing wording is sufficient to cover them then we can also add tanks, intercontinental ballistic missiles and orbiting laser platforms. As to (b), there is nothing specific in the Second Amendment about defending life or property. The wording vaguely refers to ensuring "the security of a free State", which is more about protecting the nation (either from aggressors, or from itself). You are correct in stating that "class is over", insofar in that I cannot learn anything useful from you. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 17:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277699 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277696 +++$+++ 277698 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.232589480E09 +++$+++ Que?!  I never wrote that the second amendment has anything to do with assualt weapons, only that the lawful use of assualt weapons protects life and personal property.  Mixty-twisty, professor of constitutional law.  You are correct, in that it is the Declaration of Independence (rather than the Constitution) that speaks to my pursuit of happiness.  I choose to agree with Abraham Lincoln, who popularized the now-standard view that the Declaration's preamble is a statement of principles through which the Constitution should be interpreted.  See?  Keep you eyes open, and you might learn a thing or two.   +++$+++ :::Que?!  I never wrote that the second amendment has anything to do with assualt weapons, only that the lawful use of assualt weapons protects life and personal property.  Mixty-twisty, professor of constitutional law.  You are correct, in that it is the Declaration of Independence (rather than the Constitution) that speaks to my pursuit of happiness.  I choose to agree with Abraham Lincoln, who popularized the now-standard view that the Declaration's preamble is a statement of principles through which the Constitution should be interpreted.  See?  Keep you eyes open, and you might learn a thing or two.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 17:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277700 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277696 +++$+++ 277699 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.232590440E09 +++$+++ Your words indicated you thought ownership of assault weapons was a Constitutional right, so you can see why I responded the way I did. I disagree with your assessment that they are necessary to protect life and property - this would have to assume that your life and\/or property would be threatened by someone similarly armed - an extremely rare occurrence in all but a few unpleasant parts of the nation. --  +++$+++ ::::Your words indicated you thought ownership of assault weapons was a Constitutional right, so you can see why I responded the way I did. I disagree with your assessment that they are necessary to protect life and property - this would have to assume that your life and/or property would be threatened by someone similarly armed - an extremely rare occurrence in all but a few unpleasant parts of the nation. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 18:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277701 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277696 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.232593200E09 +++$+++ And, assault rifles ''are'' necessary to protect my life, that of my family, and my property.  I, and I, alone get to make that determination.  If a bad guy has a knife, I want a gun.  If a bad guy has a revolver, I want a semi-auto gun.  If a bad guy has a semi-auto gun, I want an assault rifle.  Having a \"proportional\" response in firepower is, tactically, a dumb thing to attempt to achieve.  Should I poll all the bad guys and ask them who plans to break into my house to kill me by use of a) rubber bands, b) sticks, c) knifes, d) revolvers, e) semi's, and f) assault rifles?  This way, can I assure myself that I will have the \"right\" defensive weapon?  +++$+++ ::::::And, assault rifles ''are'' necessary to protect my life, that of my family, and my property.  I, and I, alone get to make that determination.  If a bad guy has a knife, I want a gun.  If a bad guy has a revolver, I want a semi-auto gun.  If a bad guy has a semi-auto gun, I want an assault rifle.  Having a "proportional" response in firepower is, tactically, a dumb thing to attempt to achieve.  Should I poll all the bad guys and ask them who plans to break into my house to kill me by use of a) rubber bands, b) sticks, c) knifes, d) revolvers, e) semi's, and f) assault rifles?  This way, can I assure myself that I will have the "right" defensive weapon? [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 19:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277702 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277696 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.232612100E09 +++$+++ How likely is it that someone is going to break into your home and threaten you (or your property) with semi-automatic weapons? Unless you live in what we English folk like to call a \"shit hole\", pretty ''unlikely'' I'd imagine. Personally, I would seek to live in a part of the world where I would not feel the need to have a weapon (of any kind) to defend myself. --  +++$+++ :::::::How likely is it that someone is going to break into your home and threaten you (or your property) with semi-automatic weapons? Unless you live in what we English folk like to call a "shit hole", pretty ''unlikely'' I'd imagine. Personally, I would seek to live in a part of the world where I would not feel the need to have a weapon (of any kind) to defend myself. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 00:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
277703 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277696 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.232625000E09 +++$+++ Then you don't know.  It's more likely that they would break in with a [[Semi-automatic pistol|semi-automatic firearm]] (e.g., the thug favorite Glock) than that they would with no firearm.  I would think that whether one lives in a shit hole or in a palacial estate, both are at similar risk (why would bad guys attempt to rob someone with no money and no stuff?!).  I thought I lived in a pretty nice, safe part of town, but was proven wrong when someone(s) broke into my house and stole a bunch of my stuff.  And, I had an alarm system.  If I or my family had been there, I don't think I'd have been in the mood to ''hope'' they didn't have a semi-automatic handgun.  Captain of the Obvious says, \"Of course, we all want to live in a world free of violence, but we are left to deal with the world as it is, rather than how we wish it were.\"  It only takes one time...  +++$+++ ::::::::Then you don't know.  It's more likely that they would break in with a [[Semi-automatic pistol|semi-automatic firearm]] (e.g., the thug favorite Glock) than that they would with no firearm.  I would think that whether one lives in a shit hole or in a palacial estate, both are at similar risk (why would bad guys attempt to rob someone with no money and no stuff?!).  I thought I lived in a pretty nice, safe part of town, but was proven wrong when someone(s) broke into my house and stole a bunch of my stuff.  And, I had an alarm system.  If I or my family had been there, I don't think I'd have been in the mood to ''hope'' they didn't have a semi-automatic handgun.  Captain of the Obvious says, "Of course, we all want to live in a world free of violence, but we are left to deal with the world as it is, rather than how we wish it were."  It only takes one time... [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 03:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

15553 +++$+++ jiujitsuguy +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15553 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.283893620E09 +++$+++ In light of the above, I implore you not to close this SPI and carefully scrutinize the behavioral evidence linking Nableezy to the 208-- +++$+++ In light of the above, I implore you not to close this SPI and carefully scrutinize the behavioral evidence linking Nableezy to the 208--[[User:Jiujitsuguy|Jiujitsuguy]] ([[User talk:Jiujitsuguy|talk]]) 14:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
15554 +++$+++ jiujitsuguy +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15553 +++$+++ 15553 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.283895480E09 +++$+++ Fred we are dealing with a dynamic range that is used by multiple internet connections, Nableezy being among them. Nableezy, who has a technical background from the [[Illinois Institute of Technology]] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User%3ANableezy%2FTrait_list&action=historysubmit&diff=226590833&oldid=226590407] was keenly aware of this loophole evidenced by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3A208.54.7.175&action=historysubmit&diff=365121170&oldid=364601390] where he mocks all of us. In any event user NativeForeigner seems to have closed the case based on your comments at the SPI. If you think the behavioral evidence warrants a second look, please re-open. Thanks-- +++$+++ :Fred we are dealing with a dynamic range that is used by multiple internet connections, Nableezy being among them. Nableezy, who has a technical background from the [[Illinois Institute of Technology]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ANableezy%2FTrait_list&action=historysubmit&diff=226590833&oldid=226590407] was keenly aware of this loophole evidenced by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A208.54.7.175&action=historysubmit&diff=365121170&oldid=364601390] where he mocks all of us. In any event user NativeForeigner seems to have closed the case based on your comments at the SPI. If you think the behavioral evidence warrants a second look, please re-open. Thanks--[[User:Jiujitsuguy|Jiujitsuguy]] ([[User talk:Jiujitsuguy|talk]]) 14:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
15555 +++$+++ jiujitsuguy +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15553 +++$+++ 15553 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.283896080E09 +++$+++ Just want to add one more thing. Nableezy has had multiple editors blocked or banned on a fraction of the evidence presented in the instant SPI-- +++$+++ :Just want to add one more thing. Nableezy has had multiple editors blocked or banned on a fraction of the evidence presented in the instant SPI--[[User:Jiujitsuguy|Jiujitsuguy]] ([[User talk:Jiujitsuguy|talk]]) 14:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

570571 +++$+++ Ameliorate! +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-18 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.224363540E09 +++$+++ Hi, just letting you know that I have unblocked [[User:The Anomebot2]] on the condition that it performs its other approved tasks, ie. not adding {{tnull|coord missing}} to articles. <span style=\"font-family:tahoma;font-size:80%;font-weight:bold;\">~  +++$+++ Hi, just letting you know that I have unblocked [[User:The Anomebot2]] on the condition that it performs its other approved tasks, ie. not adding {{tnull|coord missing}} to articles. <span style="font-family:tahoma;font-size:80%;font-weight:bold;">~ [[User:Ameliorate!|<span style="color:black;">User:Ameliorate!</span>]]</span> <sup>(with the !) ([[User talk:Ameliorate!|talk]])</sup> 13:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
570572 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570571 +++$+++ 570571 +++$+++ 2008-10-20 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.224521100E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 09:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
570573 +++$+++ Ameliorate! +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570571 +++$+++ 570572 +++$+++ 2008-10-20 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.224522600E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I should have given you the link before. It was discussed on ANI ([[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/IncidentArchive485#Unblocking_User:The_Anomebot2_following_centralized_discussion|archive link]]) and [[User_talk:Ameliorate!#The_Anomebot2|clarified on my talkpage]]. If it starts to add {{tl|coord missing}} again (whether there is any visible content in the template or not) it should be reblocked, but as far as I know it performed its other, approved, tasks without objection. <span style=\"font-family:tahoma;font-size:80%;font-weight:bold;\">~  +++$+++ ::Sorry, I should have given you the link before. It was discussed on ANI ([[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive485#Unblocking_User:The_Anomebot2_following_centralized_discussion|archive link]]) and [[User_talk:Ameliorate!#The_Anomebot2|clarified on my talkpage]]. If it starts to add {{tl|coord missing}} again (whether there is any visible content in the template or not) it should be reblocked, but as far as I know it performed its other, approved, tasks without objection. <span style="font-family:tahoma;font-size:80%;font-weight:bold;">~ [[User:Ameliorate!|<span style="color:black;">User:Ameliorate!</span>]]</span> <sup>(with the !) ([[User talk:Ameliorate!|talk]])</sup> 10:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
570574 +++$+++ Tinucherian +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570571 +++$+++ 570573 +++$+++ 2008-10-20 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.224522840E09 +++$+++ <s> Sorry to intrude in , David , but here is the '''[[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/IncidentArchive485#Unblocking_User:The_Anomebot2_following_centralized_discussion|link]] '''  :) -- [[User:Tinucherian|'''<em style=\"font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000\"> Tinu<\/em>''']] [[User talk:Tinucherian|'''<em style=\"font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000\">Cherian <\/em>''']] - 10:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC) <\/s> I am late --  +++$+++ :::  <s> Sorry to intrude in , David , but here is the '''[[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive485#Unblocking_User:The_Anomebot2_following_centralized_discussion|link]] '''  :) -- [[User:Tinucherian|'''<em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> Tinu</em>''']] [[User talk:Tinucherian|'''<em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000">Cherian </em>''']] - 10:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC) </s> I am late -- [[User:Tinucherian|'''<em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> Tinu</em>''']] [[User talk:Tinucherian|'''<em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000">Cherian </em>''']] - 10:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
570575 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570571 +++$+++ 570574 +++$+++ 2008-10-20 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.224525240E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 10:54, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

539845 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-25 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.282775340E09 +++$+++ It is sad that out of thousands of admins (I take it it's around 4000?) no one is from the Balkans. Can you confirm that that's the case? We used to have an Albanian admin once ([[user:Dori]]), but he has retired by now. --<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ It is sad that out of thousands of admins (I take it it's around 4000?) no one is from the Balkans. Can you confirm that that's the case? We used to have an Albanian admin once ([[user:Dori]]), but he has retired by now. --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 15:29, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
539846 +++$+++ Local hero +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539845 +++$+++ 539845 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.282779600E09 +++$+++ [[User:Yannismarou|Yannismarou]] is a Greek admin. -- +++$+++ :[[User:Yannismarou|Yannismarou]] is a Greek admin. --[[User:Local hero|<font color="blue">Local hero</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Local hero|<font color="dark yellow">talk</font>]]</sup> 16:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
539847 +++$+++ Cplakidas +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539845 +++$+++ 539846 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.282779780E09 +++$+++ Yannis is sadly inactive. As for Todor, I too would wholeheartedly support a candidacy. The funny thing is, I was just about to about point Sulmues here when I saw that he had already asked ;)  +++$+++ ::Yannis is sadly inactive. As for Todor, I too would wholeheartedly support a candidacy. The funny thing is, I was just about to about point Sulmues here when I saw that he had already asked ;) [[User:Cplakidas|Constantine]]  [[User talk:Cplakidas| ✍ ]] 16:43, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
539848 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539845 +++$+++ 539847 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.282780320E09 +++$+++ Glad you came here Local hero and Constantine. If Todor will agree I suggest that we have an agreement within Balkan editors and we all support Todor's candidacy. --<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ :::Glad you came here Local hero and Constantine. If Todor will agree I suggest that we have an agreement within Balkan editors and we all support Todor's candidacy. --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 16:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
539849 +++$+++ Cplakidas +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539845 +++$+++ 539848 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.282784340E09 +++$+++ Ahem, let's see first if he wants to ;). Also, I would refrain from canvassing of any sort, no matter how well-intentioned. This usually backfires...  +++$+++ ::::Ahem, let's see first if he wants to ;). Also, I would refrain from canvassing of any sort, no matter how well-intentioned. This usually backfires... [[User:Cplakidas|Constantine]]  [[User talk:Cplakidas| ✍ ]] 17:59, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
539850 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539845 +++$+++ 539849 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.282785180E09 +++$+++ Let's hope he does. No canvassing, this is my only thread where I'm going to write about it. It was good to see a Greek, a Macedonian and an Albanian endorsing a Bulgarian to become admin. --<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ :::::Let's hope he does. No canvassing, this is my only thread where I'm going to write about it. It was good to see a Greek, a Macedonian and an Albanian endorsing a Bulgarian to become admin. --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 18:13, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
539851 +++$+++ Local hero +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539845 +++$+++ 539850 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.282786500E09 +++$+++ Just to be clear, I only dropped by to point out that Yannismarou is an admin from the Balkans; I gave no endorsement. -- +++$+++ ::::::Just to be clear, I only dropped by to point out that Yannismarou is an admin from the Balkans; I gave no endorsement. --[[User:Local hero|<font color="blue">Local hero</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Local hero|<font color="dark yellow">talk</font>]]</sup> 18:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
539852 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539845 +++$+++ 539845 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.282794480E09 +++$+++ I hope our co-operation will continue in the future and result in many more quality articles about our region. Thanks again for your support. Best, ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : I hope our co-operation will continue in the future and result in many more quality articles about our region. Thanks again for your support. Best, ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 20:48, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
539853 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539845 +++$+++ 539852 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.282805880E09 +++$+++ Well, I gave it a try. We are all volunteers here and real life has a priority. It was good to have this talk though. Cheers. And thanks! --<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ ::Well, I gave it a try. We are all volunteers here and real life has a priority. It was good to have this talk though. Cheers. And thanks! --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 23:58, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
539854 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539845 +++$+++ 539853 +++$+++ 2010-08-26 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.282830540E09 +++$+++ Yep, you did what you could; from then on, the situation was beyond recovery :D ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ ::: Yep, you did what you could; from then on, the situation was beyond recovery :D ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 06:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

15559 +++$+++ EdJohnston +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-15 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.284617340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 23:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
15560 +++$+++ Timeshift9 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15559 +++$+++ 15559 +++$+++ 2010-09-15 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.284617640E09 +++$+++ The site is entirely an attack site against this article for reasons unknown (is he that insecure of his own political views?), and the site does not say it is owned or run by him. If it were to, I wouldn't have an issue. But creating an attack site against this article and not putting a name to it does NOT qualify as a valid external link. And to top it off, such a controversy hasn't even been discussed\/resolved on the article's talk page. Where is the consensus to include the disputed link? If Fred actually followed wikipedia guidelines and went about discussion and consensus as he should, none of this would ever have happened. How many reports has Fred made to various wikipedia boards and dismissed him? Fred, it's time to pull your socks up.  +++$+++ :The site is entirely an attack site against this article for reasons unknown (is he that insecure of his own political views?), and the site does not say it is owned or run by him. If it were to, I wouldn't have an issue. But creating an attack site against this article and not putting a name to it does NOT qualify as a valid external link. And to top it off, such a controversy hasn't even been discussed/resolved on the article's talk page. Where is the consensus to include the disputed link? If Fred actually followed wikipedia guidelines and went about discussion and consensus as he should, none of this would ever have happened. How many reports has Fred made to various wikipedia boards and dismissed him? Fred, it's time to pull your socks up. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 23:14, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
15561 +++$+++ Vyeh +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15559 +++$+++ 15560 +++$+++ 2010-09-16 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.284635940E09 +++$+++ Fred, I have asked at both ELN and WQA for other editors to get involved. I am relying on your assertion that Bob Day has claimed ownership of BobDay.com.au and that may not be enough for other ELN editors. Since you received an email from Bob Day (or his staff), it might be helpful if you could get him or his staff to insert a claim of ownership or authorization at the site. WQA is limited, especially against intransigent editors. I'll put your talk page on my watchlist.  +++$+++ ::Fred, I have asked at both ELN and WQA for other editors to get involved. I am relying on your assertion that Bob Day has claimed ownership of BobDay.com.au and that may not be enough for other ELN editors. Since you received an email from Bob Day (or his staff), it might be helpful if you could get him or his staff to insert a claim of ownership or authorization at the site. WQA is limited, especially against intransigent editors. I'll put your talk page on my watchlist. [[User:Vyeh|Vyeh]] ([[User talk:Vyeh|talk]]) 04:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

277704 +++$+++ Todd Gallagher +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-21 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.232595480E09 +++$+++ <s>I am sorry that you fail to understand what a state defense force is. Under 32 USC 109, Congress created these military units so that we would have a reserve force in case National Guards were federalized and deployed overseas. Colorado disbanded its SDF and today there is an illegal group that claims to be an SDF. Just because Hillbilly Bob and his buddies claim to be an SDF, or a Marine unit, or an Army unit, does not make them so. This is Colorado website for the TAG:  http:\/\/www.dmva.state.co.us\/ . Show me where the SDF is. Nowhere, because it does not exist. If you continue to use the SGAUS as a source, where even it states that it is a \"provisional\" SDF, I will continue to re-edit. I am sorry you fail to comprehend that \"provisional\" in this case means illegal. +++$+++ <s>I am sorry that you fail to understand what a state defense force is. Under 32 USC 109, Congress created these military units so that we would have a reserve force in case National Guards were federalized and deployed overseas. Colorado disbanded its SDF and today there is an illegal group that claims to be an SDF. Just because Hillbilly Bob and his buddies claim to be an SDF, or a Marine unit, or an Army unit, does not make them so. This is Colorado website for the TAG:  http://www.dmva.state.co.us/ . Show me where the SDF is. Nowhere, because it does not exist. If you continue to use the SGAUS as a source, where even it states that it is a "provisional" SDF, I will continue to re-edit. I am sorry you fail to comprehend that "provisional" in this case means illegal.[[User:Todd Gallagher|Todd Gallagher]] ([[User talk:Todd Gallagher|talk]]) 19:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277705 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277704 +++$+++ 277704 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.232595540E09 +++$+++ We will deal with these comments at your talk page  +++$+++ :We will deal with these comments at your talk page [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 19:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277706 +++$+++ Todd Gallagher +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277704 +++$+++ 277705 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.232596140E09 +++$+++ If I told you there were 51 states because an organization's website said there were, could I post that? Of course not. There are only 23 SDF's in the US. +++$+++ ::If I told you there were 51 states because an organization's website said there were, could I post that? Of course not. There are only 23 SDF's in the US.[[User:Todd Gallagher|Todd Gallagher]] ([[User talk:Todd Gallagher|talk]]) 19:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277707 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277704 +++$+++ 277706 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.232596620E09 +++$+++ If there was a reliable source that said there were 51 states, then yes, it is includable in Wiki.  The SGAUS website lists Texas, California, Tennesee, etc. as SDF's.  Does that make their website any less of a reliable source related to Colorado?  No.  Let's go to [[dispute resolution]] if you want to be dense about this.  Remember, your opinion or the DoD's views on this are not what Wiki is about.  SGAUS qualifies as a reliable source and the information should be included in the article.  And, you might want to lighten up on the personal attacks or you will probably find yourself blocked again.   +++$+++ :::If there was a reliable source that said there were 51 states, then yes, it is includable in Wiki.  The SGAUS website lists Texas, California, Tennesee, etc. as SDF's.  Does that make their website any less of a reliable source related to Colorado?  No.  Let's go to [[dispute resolution]] if you want to be dense about this.  Remember, your opinion or the DoD's views on this are not what Wiki is about.  SGAUS qualifies as a reliable source and the information should be included in the article.  And, you might want to lighten up on the personal attacks or you will probably find yourself blocked again.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 19:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277708 +++$+++ Todd Gallagher +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277704 +++$+++ 277707 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.232597280E09 +++$+++ Here is how reliable your source is. The SGAUS claims that Washington, D.C., has an SDF. Here is what their link to the Washington., D.C., \"SDF\" states: \"The DC Defense Force is not a government entity, nor is it a state defense force as defined by Chapter 32 Section 109 (c) of the United States Code, although it is seeking such status. The DCDF is a purely local organization, and its operations are limited primarily to within the District of Columbia.\" So much for a reliable source. +++$+++ ::::Here is how reliable your source is. The SGAUS claims that Washington, D.C., has an SDF. Here is what their link to the Washington., D.C., "SDF" states: "The DC Defense Force is not a government entity, nor is it a state defense force as defined by Chapter 32 Section 109 (c) of the United States Code, although it is seeking such status. The DCDF is a purely local organization, and its operations are limited primarily to within the District of Columbia." So much for a reliable source.[[User:Todd Gallagher|Todd Gallagher]] ([[User talk:Todd Gallagher|talk]]) 20:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

526882 +++$+++ Keithpickering +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526882 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-18 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.195451340E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Keithpickering|Keithpickering]] ([[User talk:Keithpickering|talk]]) 21:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
526883 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526882 +++$+++ 526882 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.195467720E09 +++$+++ Exactly the opposite. As Byrd's claims have been widely accepted, the assertions that they are false need to be proven.  What [[WP:Verify|reliable sources]] have '''proven''' that these are the facts? Are there other sources who dispute this?  Extraordinary claims require unquestionable sources.  Is it generally accepted in the scientific community \/ among historians that the records were falsified?  Wikipedia is not the forum to establish these claims.  Wikipedia does not accept [[WP:OR|original research]].  &mdash;  +++$+++ : Exactly the opposite. As Byrd's claims have been widely accepted, the assertions that they are false need to be proven.  What [[WP:Verify|reliable sources]] have '''proven''' that these are the facts? Are there other sources who dispute this?  Extraordinary claims require unquestionable sources.  Is it generally accepted in the scientific community / among historians that the records were falsified?  Wikipedia is not the forum to establish these claims.  Wikipedia does not accept [[WP:OR|original research]].  &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 02:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
526884 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526882 +++$+++ 526883 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.195470600E09 +++$+++ BTW, I checked the navworld link and it is up. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::BTW, I checked the navworld link and it is up. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 03:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
526885 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526882 +++$+++ 526883 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.195553760E09 +++$+++ See [[Talk:Richard_Evelyn_Byrd#North_Pole_controversy|the talk page]] for a references speaking to  [[WP:NPOV|both sides of the issue]].  Rawlins' interpretation of the diary is not completely accepted, though it does keep the controversy of the claim alive at this point. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::See [[Talk:Richard_Evelyn_Byrd#North_Pole_controversy|the talk page]] for a references speaking to  [[WP:NPOV|both sides of the issue]].  Rawlins' interpretation of the diary is not completely accepted, though it does keep the controversy of the claim alive at this point. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 02:16, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

277710 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-21 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.232585400E09 +++$+++ Please comment on the article, not the editor. I consider [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ABarack_Obama&diff=265506010&oldid=265495103 this edit] to be a personal attack, but I'll happily take the bait on your talk page. There is no reasonable justification for regular citizens owning assault weapons. ''None whatsoever.'' Obama has repeatedly stated that he has no problem with the Second Amendment provide it does not put weapons in the hands of children and criminals. He has also (quite reasonably and sensibly) stated he would like to see the reinstatement of the Assault Weapons Ban. --  +++$+++ Please comment on the article, not the editor. I consider [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABarack_Obama&diff=265506010&oldid=265495103 this edit] to be a personal attack, but I'll happily take the bait on your talk page. There is no reasonable justification for regular citizens owning assault weapons. ''None whatsoever.'' Obama has repeatedly stated that he has no problem with the Second Amendment provide it does not put weapons in the hands of children and criminals. He has also (quite reasonably and sensibly) stated he would like to see the reinstatement of the Assault Weapons Ban. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 16:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277711 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.232586060E09 +++$+++ You mistake my [[sarcasm]] for a personal attack, which it clearly is not.  Simmer down with, now, the second \"quit picking on me\" attempt at portraying my comments as a personal attack.  That one does not agree with another does not a personal attack make.  Now, to your opinion, it is just that, your opinion.  I believe there are ''many'' justifications for law-abiding \"regular\" (as opposed to irregular?) citizens owning assault rifles: a) it is the exercise of a right granted to all citizens under the US Constitution, b) the lawful use of assault weapons protects life and personal property, and c) lawfully shooting assault weapons is fun, and therefore is also an exercise of my rights to \"...the pursuit of happiness\" guaranteed by the US Constitution.  Class over.  +++$+++ :You mistake my [[sarcasm]] for a personal attack, which it clearly is not.  Simmer down with, now, the second "quit picking on me" attempt at portraying my comments as a personal attack.  That one does not agree with another does not a personal attack make.  Now, to your opinion, it is just that, your opinion.  I believe there are ''many'' justifications for law-abiding "regular" (as opposed to irregular?) citizens owning assault rifles: a) it is the exercise of a right granted to all citizens under the US Constitution, b) the lawful use of assault weapons protects life and personal property, and c) lawfully shooting assault weapons is fun, and therefore is also an exercise of my rights to "...the pursuit of happiness" guaranteed by the US Constitution.  Class over. [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 17:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277712 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ 277711 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.232588760E09 +++$+++ I agree that shooting guns is fun; however, \"the pursuit of happiness\" is ''not'' guaranteed by the Constitution. It is part of the Declaration of Independence. There is nothing in the Second Amendment about \"assault rifles\", and if you are suggesting that the existing wording is sufficient to cover them then we can also add tanks, intercontinental ballistic missiles and orbiting laser platforms. As to (b), there is nothing specific in the Second Amendment about defending life or property. The wording vaguely refers to ensuring \"the security of a free State\", which is more about protecting the nation (either from aggressors, or from itself). You are correct in stating that \"class is over\", insofar in that I cannot learn anything useful from you. --  +++$+++ ::I agree that shooting guns is fun; however, "the pursuit of happiness" is ''not'' guaranteed by the Constitution. It is part of the Declaration of Independence. There is nothing in the Second Amendment about "assault rifles", and if you are suggesting that the existing wording is sufficient to cover them then we can also add tanks, intercontinental ballistic missiles and orbiting laser platforms. As to (b), there is nothing specific in the Second Amendment about defending life or property. The wording vaguely refers to ensuring "the security of a free State", which is more about protecting the nation (either from aggressors, or from itself). You are correct in stating that "class is over", insofar in that I cannot learn anything useful from you. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 17:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277713 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ 277712 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.232589480E09 +++$+++ Que?!  I never wrote that the second amendment has anything to do with assualt weapons, only that the lawful use of assualt weapons protects life and personal property.  Mixty-twisty, professor of constitutional law.  You are correct, in that it is the Declaration of Independence (rather than the Constitution) that speaks to my pursuit of happiness.  I choose to agree with Abraham Lincoln, who popularized the now-standard view that the Declaration's preamble is a statement of principles through which the Constitution should be interpreted.  See?  Keep you eyes open, and you might learn a thing or two.   +++$+++ :::Que?!  I never wrote that the second amendment has anything to do with assualt weapons, only that the lawful use of assualt weapons protects life and personal property.  Mixty-twisty, professor of constitutional law.  You are correct, in that it is the Declaration of Independence (rather than the Constitution) that speaks to my pursuit of happiness.  I choose to agree with Abraham Lincoln, who popularized the now-standard view that the Declaration's preamble is a statement of principles through which the Constitution should be interpreted.  See?  Keep you eyes open, and you might learn a thing or two.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 17:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277714 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ 277713 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.232590440E09 +++$+++ Your words indicated you thought ownership of assault weapons was a Constitutional right, so you can see why I responded the way I did. I disagree with your assessment that they are necessary to protect life and property - this would have to assume that your life and\/or property would be threatened by someone similarly armed - an extremely rare occurrence in all but a few unpleasant parts of the nation. --  +++$+++ ::::Your words indicated you thought ownership of assault weapons was a Constitutional right, so you can see why I responded the way I did. I disagree with your assessment that they are necessary to protect life and property - this would have to assume that your life and/or property would be threatened by someone similarly armed - an extremely rare occurrence in all but a few unpleasant parts of the nation. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 18:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277715 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-21 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.232593200E09 +++$+++ And, assault rifles ''are'' necessary to protect my life, that of my family, and my property.  I, and I, alone get to make that determination.  If a bad guy has a knife, I want a gun.  If a bad guy has a revolver, I want a semi-auto gun.  If a bad guy has a semi-auto gun, I want an assault rifle.  Having a \"proportional\" response in firepower is, tactically, a dumb thing to attempt to achieve.  Should I poll all the bad guys and ask them who plans to break into my house to kill me by use of a) rubber bands, b) sticks, c) knifes, d) revolvers, e) semi's, and f) assault rifles?  This way, can I assure myself that I will have the \"right\" defensive weapon?  +++$+++ ::::::And, assault rifles ''are'' necessary to protect my life, that of my family, and my property.  I, and I, alone get to make that determination.  If a bad guy has a knife, I want a gun.  If a bad guy has a revolver, I want a semi-auto gun.  If a bad guy has a semi-auto gun, I want an assault rifle.  Having a "proportional" response in firepower is, tactically, a dumb thing to attempt to achieve.  Should I poll all the bad guys and ask them who plans to break into my house to kill me by use of a) rubber bands, b) sticks, c) knifes, d) revolvers, e) semi's, and f) assault rifles?  This way, can I assure myself that I will have the "right" defensive weapon? [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 19:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
277716 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.232612100E09 +++$+++ How likely is it that someone is going to break into your home and threaten you (or your property) with semi-automatic weapons? Unless you live in what we English folk like to call a \"shit hole\", pretty ''unlikely'' I'd imagine. Personally, I would seek to live in a part of the world where I would not feel the need to have a weapon (of any kind) to defend myself. --  +++$+++ :::::::How likely is it that someone is going to break into your home and threaten you (or your property) with semi-automatic weapons? Unless you live in what we English folk like to call a "shit hole", pretty ''unlikely'' I'd imagine. Personally, I would seek to live in a part of the world where I would not feel the need to have a weapon (of any kind) to defend myself. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 00:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
277717 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.232625000E09 +++$+++ Then you don't know.  It's more likely that they would break in with a [[Semi-automatic pistol|semi-automatic firearm]] (e.g., the thug favorite Glock) than that they would with no firearm.  I would think that whether one lives in a shit hole or in a palacial estate, both are at similar risk (why would bad guys attempt to rob someone with no money and no stuff?!).  I thought I lived in a pretty nice, safe part of town, but was proven wrong when someone(s) broke into my house and stole a bunch of my stuff.  And, I had an alarm system.  If I or my family had been there, I don't think I'd have been in the mood to ''hope'' they didn't have a semi-automatic handgun.  Captain of the Obvious says, \"Of course, we all want to live in a world free of violence, but we are left to deal with the world as it is, rather than how we wish it were.\"  It only takes one time...  +++$+++ ::::::::Then you don't know.  It's more likely that they would break in with a [[Semi-automatic pistol|semi-automatic firearm]] (e.g., the thug favorite Glock) than that they would with no firearm.  I would think that whether one lives in a shit hole or in a palacial estate, both are at similar risk (why would bad guys attempt to rob someone with no money and no stuff?!).  I thought I lived in a pretty nice, safe part of town, but was proven wrong when someone(s) broke into my house and stole a bunch of my stuff.  And, I had an alarm system.  If I or my family had been there, I don't think I'd have been in the mood to ''hope'' they didn't have a semi-automatic handgun.  Captain of the Obvious says, "Of course, we all want to live in a world free of violence, but we are left to deal with the world as it is, rather than how we wish it were."  It only takes one time... [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 03:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
277718 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.232660160E09 +++$+++ Don't get me wrong - I have nothing against gun ownership, although I believe the Second Amendment has been used to create a \"gun culture\" that was never intended. I think assault weapons are totally over the top and unnecessary, and should be universally illegal. A properly-aimed pistol will be just as effective against a perp with a fully-automatic machine gun, who probably has little experience and will just spray bullets around willy nilly. Someone with experience and training will ''kill you'' before you get the chance to defend yourself, so it won't matter what kind of weapon you have in that situation. Gun ownership (and permits for guns) should be tied to proper training, and denied to individuals who fail that training. Guns should be stored properly, where it is ''impossible'' for children to access them. High caliber and automatic weapons should not be owned by private individuals. --  +++$+++ :::::::::Don't get me wrong - I have nothing against gun ownership, although I believe the Second Amendment has been used to create a "gun culture" that was never intended. I think assault weapons are totally over the top and unnecessary, and should be universally illegal. A properly-aimed pistol will be just as effective against a perp with a fully-automatic machine gun, who probably has little experience and will just spray bullets around willy nilly. Someone with experience and training will ''kill you'' before you get the chance to defend yourself, so it won't matter what kind of weapon you have in that situation. Gun ownership (and permits for guns) should be tied to proper training, and denied to individuals who fail that training. Guns should be stored properly, where it is ''impossible'' for children to access them. High caliber and automatic weapons should not be owned by private individuals. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 13:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
277719 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.232661720E09 +++$+++ I largely disagree, for the reasons discussed above, with your assertions, with the exception of those related to safe use and storage of guns.  So, we will end on a note of agreement.  +++$+++ ::::::::::I largely disagree, for the reasons discussed above, with your assertions, with the exception of those related to safe use and storage of guns.  So, we will end on a note of agreement. [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 14:02, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
277720 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.232663220E09 +++$+++ Fine with me. I have enjoyed this healthy debate. Thank you. --  +++$+++ :::::::::::Fine with me. I have enjoyed this healthy debate. Thank you. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 14:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
277721 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277710 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.232664780E09 +++$+++ Thanks to you, as well.  I'm confident we will find agreement on ''something'' again in the future.  +++$+++ ::::::::::::Thanks to you, as well.  I'm confident we will find agreement on ''something'' again in the future. [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 14:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

539857 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-03 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.283564700E09 +++$+++ Good suggestion, and Moved to [[Talk:Dhrovjan_Monastery]]. Actually I wanted to do it even before, but didn't want to hurt the creator of the article's feeling: Your Uber Monkey. He already did 3 DYKs after 3 days in Wikipedia. --<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ Good suggestion, and Moved to [[Talk:Dhrovjan_Monastery]]. Actually I wanted to do it even before, but didn't want to hurt the creator of the article's feeling: Your Uber Monkey. He already did 3 DYKs after 3 days in Wikipedia. --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 18:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
539858 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539857 +++$+++ 539857 +++$+++ 2010-09-05 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.283705580E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I don't think the guy would be offended. I hope you guys keep up the good work, I've seen a lot of quality content focused on Albania on DYK lately! Best, ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : Thank you. I don't think the guy would be offended. I hope you guys keep up the good work, I've seen a lot of quality content focused on Albania on DYK lately! Best, ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 09:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
539859 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539857 +++$+++ 539858 +++$+++ 2010-09-09 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.284063300E09 +++$+++ Btw, I disagreed with Alt1 of L'ecrivant, in DYK of [[Aziz \xc7ami]]: you may want to see [[Template_talk:Did_you_know]] and close Aziz who's been waiting for a while. I let him L'ecrivant too. --<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ ::Btw, I disagreed with Alt1 of L'ecrivant, in DYK of [[Aziz Çami]]: you may want to see [[Template_talk:Did_you_know]] and close Aziz who's been waiting for a while. I let him L'ecrivant too. --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 13:15, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

15571 +++$+++ Rédacteur Tibet +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-30 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.285877340E09 +++$+++ I have translated in french the paragraphe [[Foreign_relations_of_Tibet#The_trade_delegation_of_1947]]. If I am correct, you contributed in writing it [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Foreign_relations_of_Tibet&diff=4935898&oldid=4934267]. Do you have any reference to it? This would be of help to me, since I was asked to provide references. With many thanks for your good work and for your help.-- +++$+++ I have translated in french the paragraphe [[Foreign_relations_of_Tibet#The_trade_delegation_of_1947]]. If I am correct, you contributed in writing it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foreign_relations_of_Tibet&diff=4935898&oldid=4934267]. Do you have any reference to it? This would be of help to me, since I was asked to provide references. With many thanks for your good work and for your help.--[[User:Rédacteur Tibet|Rédacteur Tibet]] ([[User talk:Rédacteur Tibet|talk]]) 13:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
15572 +++$+++ Rédacteur Tibet +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15571 +++$+++ 15571 +++$+++ 2010-10-01 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.285973820E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your response and indication. As far as I know this paragraph is correct and neutral. I will follow your work on the article and will add the reference in the french translation. All best wishes. -- +++$+++ :Many thanks for your response and indication. As far as I know this paragraph is correct and neutral. I will follow your work on the article and will add the reference in the french translation. All best wishes. --[[User:Rédacteur Tibet|Rédacteur Tibet]] ([[User talk:Rédacteur Tibet|talk]]) 15:57, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

539861 +++$+++ Vinie007 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539861 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-08 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.283961060E09 +++$+++ I made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Citypark_Albania it] past the 1500 characters now :D! -- +++$+++ I made [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Citypark_Albania it] past the 1500 characters now :D! --[[User:Vinie007|Vinie007]] 08:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
539862 +++$+++ Vinie007 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539861 +++$+++ 539861 +++$+++ 2010-09-10 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.284134340E09 +++$+++ I fixed what u wanted me to do -- +++$+++ :I fixed what u wanted me to do --[[User:Vinie007|Vinie007]] 08:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
539863 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539861 +++$+++ 539862 +++$+++ 2010-09-10 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.284141840E09 +++$+++ Thanks mate, I'll check it out as soon as I can. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ :: Thanks mate, I'll check it out as soon as I can. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 11:04, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

15574 +++$+++ Timneu22 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15574 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-12 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.286903640E09 +++$+++ If [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/Bigmaninthebox\/Archive it was confirmed that accounts are sockpuppets], why aren't the socks blocked? {{watching}} &mdash; <small> +++$+++ If [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bigmaninthebox/Archive it was confirmed that accounts are sockpuppets], why aren't the socks blocked? {{watching}} &mdash; <small>[[User:Timneu22|Timneu22]]<span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span>&#32; [[User talk:Timneu22|talk]]</small> 10:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
15575 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15574 +++$+++ 15574 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.286916240E09 +++$+++ We don't automatically impose blocks on socks, if it seems a warning might be enough. If socking continues with these or other socks then a block should be imposed.  +++$+++ :We don't automatically impose blocks on socks, if it seems a warning might be enough. If socking continues with these or other socks then a block should be imposed. [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 13:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

15576 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-13 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.286980440E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Atlantic_Wind_Connection&diff=prev&oldid=390305207 This edit] contains too much direct copying from the ''New York Times'' article you cite as a source. The detail added is welcome but paraphrasing is necessary to avoid extensive blocks of quoted text.  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atlantic_Wind_Connection&diff=prev&oldid=390305207 This edit] contains too much direct copying from the ''New York Times'' article you cite as a source. The detail added is welcome but paraphrasing is necessary to avoid extensive blocks of quoted text. [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 07:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
15577 +++$+++ Alansohn +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15576 +++$+++ 15576 +++$+++ 2010-10-13 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.287017580E09 +++$+++ Other than a few brief quotes from individuals that were put in quotation marks, there was no direct copying. All of the detail that was added was paraphrased from the articles cited as references. Can you point to what you believe was \"direct copying\" from ''The Times'' to the article?  +++$+++ :Other than a few brief quotes from individuals that were put in quotation marks, there was no direct copying. All of the detail that was added was paraphrased from the articles cited as references. Can you point to what you believe was "direct copying" from ''The Times'' to the article? [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 17:53, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
15578 +++$+++ Alansohn +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15576 +++$+++ 15577 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.287296880E09 +++$+++ I will do my best to address your concerns while restoring the sourced material that had been deleted. Let me know if you have any further issues.  +++$+++ ::I will do my best to address your concerns while restoring the sourced material that had been deleted. Let me know if you have any further issues. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 23:28, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

539866 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-10 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.284107220E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For the outstanding efforts in [[wp:DYK]] to help Balkanian editors successfully bring their good articles to the world. My personal admiration and recognition. <span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For the outstanding efforts in [[wp:DYK]] to help Balkanian editors successfully bring their good articles to the world. My personal admiration and recognition. <span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 01:27, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
539867 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539866 +++$+++ 539866 +++$+++ 2010-09-10 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.284129960E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much! ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : Thank you very much! ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 07:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

15579 +++$+++ Mdupont +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-19 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.287537660E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Mdupont|James Michael DuPont]] ([[User talk:Mdupont|talk]]) 18:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
15580 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15579 +++$+++ 15579 +++$+++ 2010-10-19 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.287538680E09 +++$+++ The point is that some terms such as \"stream\" are used technically. That point is clearly made in the Wikia article but not in our article. Changing it would vitiate the point I was making, which was not understood by anyone anyway; however, it's ancient history without any current relevance for any purpose other than maintaining an accurate history of editing.  +++$+++ :The point is that some terms such as "stream" are used technically. That point is clearly made in the Wikia article but not in our article. Changing it would vitiate the point I was making, which was not understood by anyone anyway; however, it's ancient history without any current relevance for any purpose other than maintaining an accurate history of editing. [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 18:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

277725 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277725 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-28 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.233153180E09 +++$+++ We get a 3-hour break from that bozo.  +++$+++ We get a 3-hour break from that bozo. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 06:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
277726 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277725 +++$+++ 277725 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.233153840E09 +++$+++ \"A dream, to some... A NIGHTMARE TO OTHERS!\" >:)  +++$+++ :"A dream, to some... A NIGHTMARE TO OTHERS!" >:) [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 06:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

277727 +++$+++ Todd Gallagher +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-28 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.233153720E09 +++$+++ <s>Obviously you are affiliated with this illegal Colorado militia that violates federal law by wearing the military uniform without authorization. Colorado disbanded its SDF. I have shown you that. Since CO has no SDF, you cannot include it. Billy Bob's Militia is not an SDF. SDF's are state regulated, not redneck-regulated.  +++$+++ <s>Obviously you are affiliated with this illegal Colorado militia that violates federal law by wearing the military uniform without authorization. Colorado disbanded its SDF. I have shown you that. Since CO has no SDF, you cannot include it. Billy Bob's Militia is not an SDF. SDF's are state regulated, not redneck-regulated. [[User:Todd Gallagher|Todd Gallagher]] ([[User talk:Todd Gallagher|talk]]) 06:42, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
277728 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277727 +++$+++ 277727 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.233154140E09 +++$+++ I am not, and I have never met anyone that is.  I am not a cop to decide whether they are legal or illegal; are legally wearing military uniforms or not.  You have to play by Wiki's rules or don't contribute.  The rule is that we go with what the reliable sources say, not our personal opinions or synthesis (please familiarize yourself by reading '''[[WP:Syn|here]]''').  We have been through this about eleventy-billion times now.  Also, please mind your civility.   +++$+++ :I am not, and I have never met anyone that is.  I am not a cop to decide whether they are legal or illegal; are legally wearing military uniforms or not.  You have to play by Wiki's rules or don't contribute.  The rule is that we go with what the reliable sources say, not our personal opinions or synthesis (please familiarize yourself by reading '''[[WP:Syn|here]]''').  We have been through this about eleventy-billion times now.  Also, please mind your civility.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 06:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

277729 +++$+++ Todd Gallagher +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277729 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-28 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.233154620E09 +++$+++ NGR 10-4 reads: \"An SDF is a component of the executive department of each State, and is under the exclusive control of the governor or his\/her authorized representative.\" Therefore, all SDF's are state agencies. Billy Bob's militia in CO is not a state agency. If it is, show me. Otherwise stop listing it. +++$+++ NGR 10-4 reads: "An SDF is a component of the executive department of each State, and is under the exclusive control of the governor or his/her authorized representative." Therefore, all SDF's are state agencies. Billy Bob's militia in CO is not a state agency. If it is, show me. Otherwise stop listing it.[[User:Todd Gallagher|Todd Gallagher]] ([[User talk:Todd Gallagher|talk]]) 06:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
277730 +++$+++ Todd Gallagher +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277729 +++$+++ 277729 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.233154800E09 +++$+++ This seems difficult for you to comprehend, but I have a military ID. So does every other member of the legal SDF's. Does Billy Bob in the CO SDF (Provisional)? I do not think so. +++$+++ :This seems difficult for you to comprehend, but I have a military ID. So does every other member of the legal SDF's. Does Billy Bob in the CO SDF (Provisional)? I do not think so.[[User:Todd Gallagher|Todd Gallagher]] ([[User talk:Todd Gallagher|talk]]) 07:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
277731 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277729 +++$+++ 277730 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.233154980E09 +++$+++ Hey, slick, I have a military ID too (and mine's issued by the US government).  Now, we may ''finally'' be getting somewhere with you.  I am going to edit the article slightly to remove \"Therefore, all SDF's are state agencies.\"  That's forming a conclusion and that's not allowed.  See, GSDF that wasn't hard, was it?  No need to revert to using ANON IPs and accusing me of belonging to an illegal organization.  I'll accept your apology for acting like an ass at any time.   +++$+++ ::Hey, slick, I have a military ID too (and mine's issued by the US government).  Now, we may ''finally'' be getting somewhere with you.  I am going to edit the article slightly to remove "Therefore, all SDF's are state agencies."  That's forming a conclusion and that's not allowed.  See, GSDF that wasn't hard, was it?  No need to revert to using ANON IPs and accusing me of belonging to an illegal organization.  I'll accept your apology for acting like an ass at any time.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 07:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
277732 +++$+++ Todd Gallagher +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277729 +++$+++ 277731 +++$+++ 2009-01-28 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.233155460E09 +++$+++ Wrong, Einstein. I have not done any anonymous edits. Of course, if you knew how to read IP addresses, you would know that. Take some CS 1101 and catch up with the era. As for the quote, that is literally from an Army regulation and is sourced, so don't touch it. Since you have AKO access, go read a reg called NGR 10-4. +++$+++ :::Wrong, Einstein. I have not done any anonymous edits. Of course, if you knew how to read IP addresses, you would know that. Take some CS 1101 and catch up with the era. As for the quote, that is literally from an Army regulation and is sourced, so don't touch it. Since you have AKO access, go read a reg called NGR 10-4.[[User:Todd Gallagher|Todd Gallagher]] ([[User talk:Todd Gallagher|talk]]) 07:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

15586 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15586 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-07 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.289199960E09 +++$+++ Fred, I wouldn't know how to add a field to this template. Is this something we should raise on the template's talk page? --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ Fred, I wouldn't know how to add a field to this template. Is this something we should raise on the template's talk page? --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|JN]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 23:06, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
15587 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15586 +++$+++ 15586 +++$+++ 2010-11-07 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.289200620E09 +++$+++ Yes, I might be able to add it if there is agreement regarding [[Template:Cite journal]], but it is specialized work.  +++$+++ :Yes, I might be able to add it if there is agreement regarding [[Template:Cite journal]], but it is specialized work. [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 23:17, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

546538 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-24 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.224903120E09 +++$+++ Got the rest. Thank you. ''' +++$+++ Got the rest. Thank you. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 19:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
546539 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546538 +++$+++ 546538 +++$+++ 2008-10-24 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.224905160E09 +++$+++ Your welcome. It was no problem at all. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Your welcome. It was no problem at all. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 20:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

15590 +++$+++ LegitimateAndEvenCompelling +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-20 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.290259440E09 +++$+++ I see even my town and state is there too. -- +++$+++ I see even my town and state is there too. --[[User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|LegitimateAndEvenCompelling]] ([[User talk:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|talk]]) 05:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
15591 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15590 +++$+++ 15590 +++$+++ 2010-11-20 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.290277440E09 +++$+++ I've reverted, for the time being, my posting of excerpts from mainstream newspapers that quote, or are written by, a certain library activist. That activist is actively engaged in editing Wikipedia articles in his area of activism. We all know of cases where that kind of editing has turned out poorly, even where we might have supported the activist's causes. There are so many other topics, it's best to avoid those we feel most strongly about. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :I've reverted, for the time being, my posting of excerpts from mainstream newspapers that quote, or are written by, a certain library activist. That activist is actively engaged in editing Wikipedia articles in his area of activism. We all know of cases where that kind of editing has turned out poorly, even where we might have supported the activist's causes. There are so many other topics, it's best to avoid those we feel most strongly about. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 10:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
15592 +++$+++ Drrll +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15590 +++$+++ 15591 +++$+++ 2010-11-20 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.290284580E09 +++$+++ Excuse me, but how is it that an admin would not know not to out a user?  +++$+++ ::Excuse me, but how is it that an admin would not know not to out a user? [[User:Drrll|Drrll]] ([[User talk:Drrll|talk]]) 12:23, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
15593 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15590 +++$+++ 15592 +++$+++ 2010-11-20 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.290293400E09 +++$+++ It is not that simple. The problem is how successfully address conflict of interest without doing so. It is not a trivial problem.  +++$+++ :::It is not that simple. The problem is how successfully address conflict of interest without doing so. It is not a trivial problem. [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 14:50, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
15594 +++$+++ LegitimateAndEvenCompelling +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15590 +++$+++ 15593 +++$+++ 2010-11-20 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.290298500E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Fred, and again I'm sorry we all have to be going through this. And I am very concerned that the person harassing me outside of Wikipedia in numerous ways for a long period of time has joined Wikipedia and has coopted Will Beback in his efforts to further harass and defame me. Fred, this is not a joke.  Please consider having some kind of discussion with Will Beback.  -- +++$+++ ::::Thanks, Fred, and again I'm sorry we all have to be going through this. And I am very concerned that the person harassing me outside of Wikipedia in numerous ways for a long period of time has joined Wikipedia and has coopted Will Beback in his efforts to further harass and defame me. Fred, this is not a joke.  Please consider having some kind of discussion with Will Beback.  --[[User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|LegitimateAndEvenCompelling]] ([[User talk:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|talk]]) 16:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
15595 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15590 +++$+++ 15594 +++$+++ 2010-11-20 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.290315180E09 +++$+++ LAEC links to his blog and website from his user page, and those websites contain his name. So I don't see how posting that on Wikipedia is outing. I fail to see how there can be sufficient disclosure without identification. If an activist who is frequently quoted in newspapers does not feel comfortable revealing his name on Wikipedia then that activist should not be editing topics related to his activism. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::::LAEC links to his blog and website from his user page, and those websites contain his name. So I don't see how posting that on Wikipedia is outing. I fail to see how there can be sufficient disclosure without identification. If an activist who is frequently quoted in newspapers does not feel comfortable revealing his name on Wikipedia then that activist should not be editing topics related to his activism. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 20:53, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
15596 +++$+++ LegitimateAndEvenCompelling +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15590 +++$+++ 15595 +++$+++ 2010-11-21 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.290340620E09 +++$+++ There is and has been for a while sufficient disclosure here: [[User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling#COI_notice]].  Further, depending on the circumstance, I reveal my COI again on various Talk pages.  I'm not fooling anyone and no one is getting fooled.  There are people from time to time, however, who seek to stop me from editing, and COI and outing me are some of the means they try to use to stop my editing. A newbie outing someone is understandable, but Will Beback has almost 100,000 edits. -- +++$+++ ::::::There is and has been for a while sufficient disclosure here: [[User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling#COI_notice]].  Further, depending on the circumstance, I reveal my COI again on various Talk pages.  I'm not fooling anyone and no one is getting fooled.  There are people from time to time, however, who seek to stop me from editing, and COI and outing me are some of the means they try to use to stop my editing. A newbie outing someone is understandable, but Will Beback has almost 100,000 edits. --[[User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|LegitimateAndEvenCompelling]] ([[User talk:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|talk]]) 03:57, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
15597 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15590 +++$+++ 15596 +++$+++ 2010-11-21 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.290357720E09 +++$+++ There was no outing since you link to your webpage on your userpage, and your webpage identifies you by name. You are frequently quoted in newspapers as the owner of that website. [And you've signed your name and website to at least a hundred blog comments across the Internet. You've made little effort to keep your identity, or even your location, private. On the contrary, by making yourself available to the media you've made yourself a public person in regard to library issues.] Now that I'm getting a better picture of the problem, it goes beyond simple COI and look more like advocacy. Editors have been banned for using Wikipedia as a platform for advocacy. There have been complaints about your editing for years. Soliciting meatpuppets on FreeRepublic, which you've done, is against policy. And that was just two weeks ago. Instead of addressing my complaints, you've accused me of belonging to some conspiracy against you and of gaining secret knowledge through nefarious means. You are free to edit topics in which you can edit neutrally. However your focus on Wikipedia has been on topics in which you are an activist, and your edits appear to be part of your advocacy. That's unacceptable. Since it appears that you will not listen to me either, maybe another RfC is necessary.  &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::::::There was no outing since you link to your webpage on your userpage, and your webpage identifies you by name. You are frequently quoted in newspapers as the owner of that website. [And you've signed your name and website to at least a hundred blog comments across the Internet. You've made little effort to keep your identity, or even your location, private. On the contrary, by making yourself available to the media you've made yourself a public person in regard to library issues.] Now that I'm getting a better picture of the problem, it goes beyond simple COI and look more like advocacy. Editors have been banned for using Wikipedia as a platform for advocacy. There have been complaints about your editing for years. Soliciting meatpuppets on FreeRepublic, which you've done, is against policy. And that was just two weeks ago. Instead of addressing my complaints, you've accused me of belonging to some conspiracy against you and of gaining secret knowledge through nefarious means. You are free to edit topics in which you can edit neutrally. However your focus on Wikipedia has been on topics in which you are an activist, and your edits appear to be part of your advocacy. That's unacceptable. Since it appears that you will not listen to me either, maybe another RfC is necessary.  &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 08:42, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
15598 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15590 +++$+++ 15597 +++$+++ 2010-11-21 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.290369060E09 +++$+++ And I just found this: [http:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/story\/2006\/9\/24\/1250\/65909 Religious Internet Filters already in Public Schools], which asserts that the owner of SafeLibraries.org has a commercial relationship with [[American Family Association]] regarding library software.[http:\/\/toolserver.org\/~daniel\/WikiSense\/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&page=American_Family_Association&since=2008-01-01&until=&grouped=on&order=-edit_count&max=100&order=-edit_count&format=html] &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::::::::And I just found this: [http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/9/24/1250/65909 Religious Internet Filters already in Public Schools], which asserts that the owner of SafeLibraries.org has a commercial relationship with [[American Family Association]] regarding library software.[http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&page=American_Family_Association&since=2008-01-01&until=&grouped=on&order=-edit_count&max=100&order=-edit_count&format=html] &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 11:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

46289 +++$+++ Mattinbgn +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-23 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.298474580E09 +++$+++ [[:File:ChristChurch Cathedral - 2011 earthquake damage.jpg]] is nOT a copyright violation. The file is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license and was reviewed by the File Upload Bot. --  +++$+++ [[:File:ChristChurch Cathedral - 2011 earthquake damage.jpg]] is nOT a copyright violation. The file is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license and was reviewed by the File Upload Bot. -- [[User:Mattinbgn|Mattinbgn]] ([[User talk:Mattinbgn|talk]]) 07:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
46290 +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ XLerate +++$+++ 46289 +++$+++ 46289 +++$+++ 2011-02-23 07:53:00 +++$+++ 1.298476380E09 +++$+++ I've raised a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#RNZAF_photo]] in relation to this.  +++$+++ :I've raised a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#RNZAF_photo]] in relation to this. [[User:XLerate|XLerate]] ([[User talk:XLerate#top|talk]]) 07:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

277736 +++$+++ Bytebear +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-11 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.236760500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for coming in.  I was just pulling out my hair with the \"fringe theory\" argument.  I needed a break, so I am glad you came along.  +++$+++ Thanks for coming in.  I was just pulling out my hair with the "fringe theory" argument.  I needed a break, so I am glad you came along. [[User:Bytebear|Bytebear]] ([[User talk:Bytebear|talk]]) 01:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
277737 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277736 +++$+++ 277736 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.236762060E09 +++$+++ This tired old liberal, partisan attempt at painting anyone who doesn't agree with them as somehow \"fringe\" is getting very old. If it's so absurd, why have they spent so much time attempting to refute it?  +++$+++ :This tired old liberal, partisan attempt at painting anyone who doesn't agree with them as somehow "fringe" is getting very old. If it's so absurd, why have they spent so much time attempting to refute it? [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 02:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

539881 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-21 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.285120620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for vetting again! I would leave Victuallers' suggestion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=385989386]: it seems like I did a lot of DYKs recently and annoyed everybody with Albania, Albania: let's have the people look at the DYK without any clue where this Shirgj Monastery is and they'll find out, :-). --<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ Thanks for vetting again! I would leave Victuallers' suggestion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=385989386]: it seems like I did a lot of DYKs recently and annoyed everybody with Albania, Albania: let's have the people look at the DYK without any clue where this Shirgj Monastery is and they'll find out, :-). --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 18:57, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
539882 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539881 +++$+++ 539881 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.285132080E09 +++$+++ Well, that's entirely up to you, of course, and your argument does make sense. Though, on the other hand, I've been spamming DYK with \"Bulgaria, Bulgaria\" for quite a lot of time now and it never occurred to me to stop :) Balkan articles remain rare and there's still American and English domination and DYK, so let's keep annoying everyone! :) <span style=\"text-align: center; clear: both; font-family:Georgia, serif; font-size: 10pt; font-variant: small-caps; font-style: normal;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ : Well, that's entirely up to you, of course, and your argument does make sense. Though, on the other hand, I've been spamming DYK with "Bulgaria, Bulgaria" for quite a lot of time now and it never occurred to me to stop :) Balkan articles remain rare and there's still American and English domination and DYK, so let's keep annoying everyone! :) <span style="text-align: center; clear: both; font-family:Georgia, serif; font-size: 10pt; font-variant: small-caps; font-style: normal;"> — [[User:TodorBozhinov|Toдor]] [[User talk:TodorBozhinov|Boжinov]] —</span> 22:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
539883 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539881 +++$+++ 539882 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.285192920E09 +++$+++ Okey doke, then done deal [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ADid_you_know&action=historysubmit&diff=386328778&oldid=386328628].--<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ ::Okey doke, then done deal [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ADid_you_know&action=historysubmit&diff=386328778&oldid=386328628].--<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 15:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

277739 +++$+++ John Norrison +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-12 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.236916140E09 +++$+++ Excuse me sir, but have I done something to offend you?  You have been most unpleasant to me, and there is no reason that you should delete my articles.  Furthermore, you have been unwilling to respond to my comments which I have courteously left here, what have I done that offended you so?  +++$+++ Excuse me sir, but have I done something to offend you?  You have been most unpleasant to me, and there is no reason that you should delete my articles.  Furthermore, you have been unwilling to respond to my comments which I have courteously left here, what have I done that offended you so? [[User:John Norrison|John Norrison]] ([[User talk:John Norrison|talk]]) 20:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
277740 +++$+++ Jac16888 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277739 +++$+++ 277739 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.236916620E09 +++$+++ Newguy, please remember to assume good faith when it comes to other users. It would not have hurt you to simply add a brief reply to John's messages as opposed to quite rudely reverting them as vandalism-- +++$+++ :Newguy, please remember to assume good faith when it comes to other users. It would not have hurt you to simply add a brief reply to John's messages as opposed to quite rudely reverting them as vandalism--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]][[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 20:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
277741 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277739 +++$+++ 277740 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.236916740E09 +++$+++ I only assume good faith until proven otherwise.  The new editor is quickly running into trouble with his [[WP:TE]], [[WP:Spam]], and [[Stalking]].  I have suggested that he read the guide at the top of his talk page.   +++$+++ ::I only assume good faith until proven otherwise.  The new editor is quickly running into trouble with his [[WP:TE]], [[WP:Spam]], and [[Stalking]].  I have suggested that he read the guide at the top of his talk page.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 20:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

15599 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-21 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.290359340E09 +++$+++ Both businesses share the same address, and both proprietors have the same first name. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ Both businesses share the same address, and both proprietors have the same first name. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 09:09, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
15600 +++$+++ LegitimateAndEvenCompelling +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15599 +++$+++ 15599 +++$+++ 2010-11-21 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.290381660E09 +++$+++ Fred, are you starting to see why I am feeling [[WP:HOUND]]ed by Will Beback? -- +++$+++ :Fred, are you starting to see why I am feeling [[WP:HOUND]]ed by Will Beback? --[[User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|LegitimateAndEvenCompelling]] ([[User talk:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|talk]]) 15:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
15601 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15599 +++$+++ 15599 +++$+++ 2010-11-21 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.290382980E09 +++$+++ Not really. He's addressing legitimate issues. However, what really matters is how you edit.  +++$+++ :Not really. He's addressing legitimate issues. However, what really matters is how you edit. [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 15:43, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
15602 +++$+++ LegitimateAndEvenCompelling +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15599 +++$+++ 15601 +++$+++ 2010-11-21 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.290385440E09 +++$+++ Okay, I feel better about it then because I trust your experience with such issues.  I will endeavor to continue to comply with all Wiki policy.  Thank you. -- +++$+++ ::Okay, I feel better about it then because I trust your experience with such issues.  I will endeavor to continue to comply with all Wiki policy.  Thank you. --[[User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|LegitimateAndEvenCompelling]] ([[User talk:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|talk]]) 16:24, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

277744 +++$+++ Valley2city +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277744 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-16 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.237267320E09 +++$+++ Hi, just a heads up that your Attack Speeedy Delete tag on [[Criticism of George W. Bush]] was removed. It definitely would not qualify under the rubric of [[WP:G10]] and is too contestable for a prodding. You are welcome to try an [[WP:AfD|AfD]] but I don't know how sucessful that would be.  +++$+++ Hi, just a heads up that your Attack Speeedy Delete tag on [[Criticism of George W. Bush]] was removed. It definitely would not qualify under the rubric of [[WP:G10]] and is too contestable for a prodding. You are welcome to try an [[WP:AfD|AfD]] but I don't know how sucessful that would be. [[User:Valley2city|<b><span style="background: blue; color: white;"><font face="Comic Sans MS">Valley</font></span></b>]]2[[User talk:Valley2city|<b><span style="background: skyblue; color:white;">city</span></b><sup>‽</sup>]] 22:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
277745 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277744 +++$+++ 277744 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.237267620E09 +++$+++ Yep, saw that.  The article most certainly violates Wiki rules on attacks, POV forks, etc.  There is a move on the talk page to merge with [[Public perception of George W. Bush]], which I support, so we'll see how that goes.   +++$+++ :Yep, saw that.  The article most certainly violates Wiki rules on attacks, POV forks, etc.  There is a move on the talk page to merge with [[Public perception of George W. Bush]], which I support, so we'll see how that goes.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 22:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

277746 +++$+++ The Magnificent Clean-keeper +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-22 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.237790160E09 +++$+++ I reversed you again as I just can't find it in the source unless you did the math by yourself which would be OR. If my eyes are really that bad and giving up on me I apologize if you point out the paragraph in the source that says as you said  (since even ctrl-f didn't help me). Just in case I'm right you might want to search for a citation that would back-up this part I reversed. Thanks, -- +++$+++ I reversed you again as I just can't find it in the source unless you did the math by yourself which would be OR. If my eyes are really that bad and giving up on me I apologize if you point out the paragraph in the source that says as you said  (since even ctrl-f didn't help me). Just in case I'm right you might want to search for a citation that would back-up this part I reversed. Thanks, --[[User:The Magnificent Clean-keeper|The Magnificent Clean-keeper]] ([[User talk:The Magnificent Clean-keeper|talk]]) 23:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
277747 +++$+++ Newguy34 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277746 +++$+++ 277746 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.237802400E09 +++$+++ Good grief, blasted Yahoo must have changed the article text on me, so I re-cited it, and then added a second cite.  Thanks for your patience.   +++$+++ :Good grief, blasted Yahoo must have changed the article text on me, so I re-cited it, and then added a second cite.  Thanks for your patience.  [[User:Newguy34|Newguy34]] ([[User talk:Newguy34#top|talk]]) 03:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
277748 +++$+++ The Magnificent Clean-keeper +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277746 +++$+++ 277747 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.237803840E09 +++$+++ Such can happen. I'll take a look tomorrow since it's getting late here for me but good to know that I'm not as blind as I thought. Regards, -- +++$+++ ::Such can happen. I'll take a look tomorrow since it's getting late here for me but good to know that I'm not as blind as I thought. Regards, --[[User:The Magnificent Clean-keeper|The Magnificent Clean-keeper]] ([[User talk:The Magnificent Clean-keeper|talk]]) 03:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

15603 +++$+++ Wsiegmund +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15603 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-21 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.290403200E09 +++$+++ I haven't previously encountered this editor (as far as I know). The record shows that LegitimateAndEvenCompelling's edits are dominated by those to Christian conservative and censorship-related topics.[http:\/\/wikidashboard.appspot.com\/enwiki\/wiki\/User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling#] His\/her edit history shows a consistent pattern of using Wikipedia as a [[WP:BATTLE|battleground]] and attempts to misuse Wikipedia policies and guidance to win arguments and silence opposition. This incident appears to fit this pattern. I see examples of [[WP:TEND]] and [[WP:HEAR]] as well as borderline [[WP:CIVIL|incivility]]. In his\/her own advocacy, a common tactic is to claim that others are using Wikipedia as a [[WP:SOAP|soapbox]]. Subsequent to LAEC's community sanction case that led to his\/her indefinite block (reversed three months later), LAEC became more sophisticated and wary, but appeared to continue to edit as an advocate, for the most part.([[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Community_sanction\/Archive12#Proposal_to_ban_User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling_from_library-related_topics]]) LAEC's contributions to [[Talk:Southern_Poverty_Law_Center]], archive2 and archive3 of that page, all from this year, provide many examples of this behavior. I think a topic ban is overdue.  +++$+++ I haven't previously encountered this editor (as far as I know). The record shows that LegitimateAndEvenCompelling's edits are dominated by those to Christian conservative and censorship-related topics.[http://wikidashboard.appspot.com/enwiki/wiki/User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling#] His/her edit history shows a consistent pattern of using Wikipedia as a [[WP:BATTLE|battleground]] and attempts to misuse Wikipedia policies and guidance to win arguments and silence opposition. This incident appears to fit this pattern. I see examples of [[WP:TEND]] and [[WP:HEAR]] as well as borderline [[WP:CIVIL|incivility]]. In his/her own advocacy, a common tactic is to claim that others are using Wikipedia as a [[WP:SOAP|soapbox]]. Subsequent to LAEC's community sanction case that led to his/her indefinite block (reversed three months later), LAEC became more sophisticated and wary, but appeared to continue to edit as an advocate, for the most part.([[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Community_sanction/Archive12#Proposal_to_ban_User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling_from_library-related_topics]]) LAEC's contributions to [[Talk:Southern_Poverty_Law_Center]], archive2 and archive3 of that page, all from this year, provide many examples of this behavior. I think a topic ban is overdue. [[User:Wsiegmund|Walter Siegmund]] [[User_talk:Wsiegmund|(talk)]] 21:20, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
15604 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15603 +++$+++ 15603 +++$+++ 2010-11-22 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.290413460E09 +++$+++ Could a topic ban be imposed without an arbitration case?  +++$+++ :Could a topic ban be imposed without an arbitration case? [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 00:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
15605 +++$+++ Wsiegmund +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15603 +++$+++ 15604 +++$+++ 2010-11-22 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.290414840E09 +++$+++ From [[Wikipedia:BAN#Community_bans_and_restrictions]], it would seem that an arbitration case is not required.  +++$+++ ::From [[Wikipedia:BAN#Community_bans_and_restrictions]], it would seem that an arbitration case is not required. [[User:Wsiegmund|Walter Siegmund]] [[User_talk:Wsiegmund|(talk)]] 00:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
15606 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15603 +++$+++ 15605 +++$+++ 2010-11-22 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.290415800E09 +++$+++ I'd originally thought of an RFC, but perhaps an AN thread would be more effective. There was already one RFC a couple of years ago, on basically the same issue. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::I'd originally thought of an RFC, but perhaps an AN thread would be more effective. There was already one RFC a couple of years ago, on basically the same issue. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 00:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
15607 +++$+++ LegitimateAndEvenCompelling +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15603 +++$+++ 15604 +++$+++ 2010-11-22 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.290416040E09 +++$+++ That SPLC matter is old history.  I am actively involved on SPLC right now.  Go ahead and find one problem with my editing there despite the obvious differences.  Further, I edit pages of all political stripes.  For example, for the co-author of \"The Joy of Gay Sex,\" I got his photograph approved and posted on his page.  You also have to admit that the issue really is that I am not afraid to edit where others are protecting pages.  For example, ALA pages have been created and maintained to appear like Wikipedia copies of ALA pages.  My input has led the effort to turn them into Wikiworthy pages.  Is it my fault other people are using Wikipedia to promote their interests?  Is it my fault the SPLC page now looks like an SPLC pamphlet and I am leading the effort to change that?  People there are actually removing the BIAS tag and you're not supposed to, but I put it back up.  Is that a problem to anyone here? You guys know exactly what it is like to edit on a page that someone or some group is protecting.  That is what I do.  Shall I stop?  Sometimes people who oppose me realize what I'm doing and change their opinion of me.  Like Orpheus.  Is he wrong? I have gathered a number of opponents who can't stand that I am able to remove Media Matters for America references wherever they are strewn about by MMfA soapboxers.  That's right, soapboxers. Numerous procedural actions were brought against me by numerous people.  They all ended up on the losing end of the stick. Wikipedia needs more editors like me willing to do the right thing instead of being scared out by bullies protecting a page.  Look at my edits and Talk page comments now on the [[Judith Reisman]] page.  You see any problem there? The number of people who oppose me for purely political reasons it truly outstanding.  Shall I be topic banned so that the soapboxers may continue to, for example, keep the SPLC page looking like an SPLC brochure?  I led the effort to change the Censorware page to the Content-control Software page.  I won a lot of enemies there.  But it was the right thing to do and it remains to this day.  Wikipedia is better.  Should I have been topic banned on that one?  People were going around and labeling people as homophobic by added the category Homophobia to anyone they opposed for soapbox reasons.  Yes, soapbox. The community worked together to stop that soapboxing, and again it stands to this day.  Again, I gained a lot of people who did not like me after that.  Should I have been topic banned from improving Wikipedia in that case?  So go ahead and pick and choose a spot or two where I have not been perfect, but who is, and it was probably out of innocence.  You wanna topic ban me on all those pages I have improved despite the political headwinds precisely because I have tacked to the Wikipedia winds?  Wikipedia has gotten a bad name for this kind of behavior, but I know it is not Wikipedia per se doing it, it is the soapboxers, and the Wikipedia rules enable me to steer clear of sanctions every time.  I will continue to edit as I have been editing, and if you find any problems, raise them on the Talk page -- don't just seek a topic ban to make your life of protecting pages easier. Look at those people drooling to stop my editing.  BAN, AN, RFC. It's really sick that they find my editing so offensive that they need to stop me from editing the pages I edit. Who's really being offensive? They don't even go to the Talk pages to discuss issues.  No, skip over that.  Go for the throat.  It hasn't worked before and it won't work again, thanks to Wikipedia rules. -- +++$+++ ::That SPLC matter is old history.  I am actively involved on SPLC right now.  Go ahead and find one problem with my editing there despite the obvious differences.  Further, I edit pages of all political stripes.  For example, for the co-author of "The Joy of Gay Sex," I got his photograph approved and posted on his page.  You also have to admit that the issue really is that I am not afraid to edit where others are protecting pages.  For example, ALA pages have been created and maintained to appear like Wikipedia copies of ALA pages.  My input has led the effort to turn them into Wikiworthy pages.  Is it my fault other people are using Wikipedia to promote their interests?  Is it my fault the SPLC page now looks like an SPLC pamphlet and I am leading the effort to change that?  People there are actually removing the BIAS tag and you're not supposed to, but I put it back up.  Is that a problem to anyone here? You guys know exactly what it is like to edit on a page that someone or some group is protecting.  That is what I do.  Shall I stop?  Sometimes people who oppose me realize what I'm doing and change their opinion of me.  Like Orpheus.  Is he wrong? I have gathered a number of opponents who can't stand that I am able to remove Media Matters for America references wherever they are strewn about by MMfA soapboxers.  That's right, soapboxers. Numerous procedural actions were brought against me by numerous people.  They all ended up on the losing end of the stick. Wikipedia needs more editors like me willing to do the right thing instead of being scared out by bullies protecting a page.  Look at my edits and Talk page comments now on the [[Judith Reisman]] page.  You see any problem there? The number of people who oppose me for purely political reasons it truly outstanding.  Shall I be topic banned so that the soapboxers may continue to, for example, keep the SPLC page looking like an SPLC brochure?  I led the effort to change the Censorware page to the Content-control Software page.  I won a lot of enemies there.  But it was the right thing to do and it remains to this day.  Wikipedia is better.  Should I have been topic banned on that one?  People were going around and labeling people as homophobic by added the category Homophobia to anyone they opposed for soapbox reasons.  Yes, soapbox. The community worked together to stop that soapboxing, and again it stands to this day.  Again, I gained a lot of people who did not like me after that.  Should I have been topic banned from improving Wikipedia in that case?  So go ahead and pick and choose a spot or two where I have not been perfect, but who is, and it was probably out of innocence.  You wanna topic ban me on all those pages I have improved despite the political headwinds precisely because I have tacked to the Wikipedia winds?  Wikipedia has gotten a bad name for this kind of behavior, but I know it is not Wikipedia per se doing it, it is the soapboxers, and the Wikipedia rules enable me to steer clear of sanctions every time.  I will continue to edit as I have been editing, and if you find any problems, raise them on the Talk page -- don't just seek a topic ban to make your life of protecting pages easier. Look at those people drooling to stop my editing.  BAN, AN, RFC. It's really sick that they find my editing so offensive that they need to stop me from editing the pages I edit. Who's really being offensive? They don't even go to the Talk pages to discuss issues.  No, skip over that.  Go for the throat.  It hasn't worked before and it won't work again, thanks to Wikipedia rules. --[[User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|LegitimateAndEvenCompelling]] ([[User talk:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|talk]]) 00:54, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
15608 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15603 +++$+++ 15603 +++$+++ 2010-11-22 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.290464040E09 +++$+++ There are some unanswered questions. Is LAEC using an alternate account for the Wikipublicist edits? And so on. He's blocked for a few days, and there's the holidays. So maybe an AN presentation next weekend. I'd been thinking of just asking for a topic ban on libraries and filtering software, but Siegmund makes the point that there are other topics where this editor has been outspoken. The editors rarely edits outside of his core interests so a full ban may be necessary, since there aren't any areas where he seems to be editing neutrally. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :There are some unanswered questions. Is LAEC using an alternate account for the Wikipublicist edits? And so on. He's blocked for a few days, and there's the holidays. So maybe an AN presentation next weekend. I'd been thinking of just asking for a topic ban on libraries and filtering software, but Siegmund makes the point that there are other topics where this editor has been outspoken. The editors rarely edits outside of his core interests so a full ban may be necessary, since there aren't any areas where he seems to be editing neutrally. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 14:14, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
15609 +++$+++ Wsiegmund +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15603 +++$+++ 15608 +++$+++ 2010-11-23 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.290511380E09 +++$+++ On another topic, a recent post on [[Free Republic]] is a violation of [[WP :CANVAS]], in my judgment. Please see (<nowiki>http:\/\/www.***blacklisted-domain-name***.com\/tag\/by:plan2succeedorg\/index?brevity=full;tab=comments<\/nowiki>). Free Republic is aimed at a conservative audience and LAEC could be expected to know that s\/he was canvasing the like-minded, not a general cross-section of Wikipedia editors. With LAEC's experience, s\/he could be expected to be aware of CANVAS. That was the only instance I found, but it is consistent with a pattern of battleground behavior.  +++$+++ ::On another topic, a recent post on [[Free Republic]] is a violation of [[WP :CANVAS]], in my judgment. Please see (<nowiki>http://www.***blacklisted-domain-name***.com/tag/by:plan2succeedorg/index?brevity=full;tab=comments</nowiki>). Free Republic is aimed at a conservative audience and LAEC could be expected to know that s/he was canvasing the like-minded, not a general cross-section of Wikipedia editors. With LAEC's experience, s/he could be expected to be aware of CANVAS. That was the only instance I found, but it is consistent with a pattern of battleground behavior. [[User:Wsiegmund|Walter Siegmund]] [[User_talk:Wsiegmund|(talk)]] 03:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
15610 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15603 +++$+++ 15609 +++$+++ 2010-11-23 04:20:00 +++$+++ 1.290514800E09 +++$+++ The Free Republic matter is more serious. If you have any how a topic ban should be worded then that'd help. I'm collecting diffs. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::The Free Republic matter is more serious. If you have any how a topic ban should be worded then that'd help. I'm collecting diffs. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 04:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

277750 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277750 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-02 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.238730540E09 +++$+++ I've reverted you 2 recent edits at [[Barack Obama]]. The lede is a summary of the article, and the article is written in [[WP:SS|summary style]]. The lede is ''intentionally'' uncited, and the information can be find in the body of the article, and in the many sub-articles. Please seek consensus on the talk page before making ''any'' potentially contentious edit, due to the article probation. --  +++$+++ I've reverted you 2 recent edits at [[Barack Obama]]. The lede is a summary of the article, and the article is written in [[WP:SS|summary style]]. The lede is ''intentionally'' uncited, and the information can be find in the body of the article, and in the many sub-articles. Please seek consensus on the talk page before making ''any'' potentially contentious edit, due to the article probation. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 20:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
277751 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277750 +++$+++ 277750 +++$+++ 2009-04-02 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.238731020E09 +++$+++ But, the problem being, of course, is that the information cited borders on POV and ''does not'' appear in the article's main body (at least not that I can find).  Can you help point me to where a reliable source says that Obama was an underdog or that his primary victory \"surprised campaign watchers\"?  +++$+++ :But, the problem being, of course, is that the information cited borders on POV and ''does not'' appear in the article's main body (at least not that I can find).  Can you help point me to where a reliable source says that Obama was an underdog or that his primary victory "surprised campaign watchers"? [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 20:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
277752 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277750 +++$+++ 277751 +++$+++ 2009-04-02 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.238732640E09 +++$+++ I have not personally been involved in the debate, but there has been a long discussion about this very section at [[Talk:Barack Obama#Unexpected]]. You should discuss any changes you wish to make in that thread and build a consensus for them before making any further changes. --  +++$+++ ::I have not personally been involved in the debate, but there has been a long discussion about this very section at [[Talk:Barack Obama#Unexpected]]. You should discuss any changes you wish to make in that thread and build a consensus for them before making any further changes. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 21:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
277753 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277750 +++$+++ 277752 +++$+++ 2009-04-02 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.238734200E09 +++$+++ After reading that l-o-n-g discussion that appeared to be getting nowhere, and in the absense of reliable sources for the information I removed anywhere in the article (or subarticles) that I can find, I was [[WP:Be bold|bold]] and edited the sentence.  You claimed that \"the information can be find in the body of the article, and in the many sub-articles\" and cited that as the justification for reverting my edits, but that doesn't appear to be the case.  So, maybe a bit of purposeful reverting rather than knee-jerk reverting is in order here?  +++$+++ :::After reading that l-o-n-g discussion that appeared to be getting nowhere, and in the absense of reliable sources for the information I removed anywhere in the article (or subarticles) that I can find, I was [[WP:Be bold|bold]] and edited the sentence.  You claimed that "the information can be find in the body of the article, and in the many sub-articles" and cited that as the justification for reverting my edits, but that doesn't appear to be the case.  So, maybe a bit of purposeful reverting rather than knee-jerk reverting is in order here? [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 21:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

526889 +++$+++ Archtransit +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-24 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.195959420E09 +++$+++ DYK is in red alert.  Only one hour but the previous one was 18 hours late (I put some of the current hooks in the next update that is on the main page 24 hours ago!).  The one before than was 7 hours late.  Therefore, we are 3 cycles behind or 18 lost hook opportunities.  I see that you have edited within the past hour.  Thank you for your help.  +++$+++ DYK is in red alert.  Only one hour but the previous one was 18 hours late (I put some of the current hooks in the next update that is on the main page 24 hours ago!).  The one before than was 7 hours late.  Therefore, we are 3 cycles behind or 18 lost hook opportunities.  I see that you have edited within the past hour.  Thank you for your help. [[User:Archtransit|Archtransit]] ([[User talk:Archtransit|talk]]) 18:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
526890 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526889 +++$+++ 526889 +++$+++ 2007-11-24 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.195959960E09 +++$+++ Looks like Michael Hardy is on it.  So, I'll let him continue to avoid edit conflicts. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Looks like Michael Hardy is on it.  So, I'll let him continue to avoid edit conflicts. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 19:06, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

277754 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-05 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.238921880E09 +++$+++ Someone needed to call out CoM for the large slice of bullshit pie he helped himself to. --  +++$+++ Someone needed to call out CoM for the large slice of bullshit pie he helped himself to. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 01:58, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
277755 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277754 +++$+++ 277754 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.238922060E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure why you feel that it's your place to do so, or even that it actually ''needed'' to be done.  But, ''everyone'' needs to simmer down.  One man's POV is another's NPOV.   +++$+++ :I'm not sure why you feel that it's your place to do so, or even that it actually ''needed'' to be done.  But, ''everyone'' needs to simmer down.  One man's POV is another's NPOV.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 02:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
277756 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277754 +++$+++ 277755 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.238922660E09 +++$+++ I don't feel the need to justify myself here. Even the most ''cursory glance'' at CoM's edit history will reveal the scope of the problem. It doesn't surprise me one little bit that you saw fit to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&diff=281812011&oldid=281806669 single me out] and not CoM, the person who deleted the comments and precipitated the argument in the first place. --  +++$+++ ::I don't feel the need to justify myself here. Even the most ''cursory glance'' at CoM's edit history will reveal the scope of the problem. It doesn't surprise me one little bit that you saw fit to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&diff=281812011&oldid=281806669 single me out] and not CoM, the person who deleted the comments and precipitated the argument in the first place. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 02:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
277757 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277754 +++$+++ 277756 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.238924040E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm sorry you feel that way.  And, please don't compound the matter's complicated nature by also accusing me of, well, I'm not even sure what you are attempting to accuse me of doing.  But, at any rate, there is ''no excuse'' for your actions given Wiki's core principle of civility.  +++$+++ :::Well, I'm sorry you feel that way.  And, please don't compound the matter's complicated nature by also accusing me of, well, I'm not even sure what you are attempting to accuse me of doing.  But, at any rate, there is ''no excuse'' for your actions given Wiki's core principle of civility. [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 02:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

539901 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539901 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-11 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.286855520E09 +++$+++ I would really appreciate the Bulgarian view on Faveyrial. A DYK maybe? --<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ I would really appreciate the Bulgarian view on Faveyrial. A DYK maybe? --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 20:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
539902 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539901 +++$+++ 539901 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.286939880E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your help there. Now I know it'll take awhile, because the conflict of interest won't let you review. Could Zjarri or another Albanian editor review these articles, in general? --<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ :Thank you for your help there. Now I know it'll take awhile, because the conflict of interest won't let you review. Could Zjarri or another Albanian editor review these articles, in general? --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 20:18, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

277759 +++$+++  +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277759 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-06 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.239004320E09 +++$+++ Please do not misquote me, claiming I allowed my edit was POV. This misquote is not gentlemanly behaviour. The additions are factual or report correctly charges that were made in the source material. All are documented in the source material. You should desist from this improper behavior. --Zeamays (talk) 00:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ Please do not misquote me, claiming I allowed my edit was POV. This misquote is not gentlemanly behaviour. The additions are factual or report correctly charges that were made in the source material. All are documented in the source material. You should desist from this improper behavior. --Zeamays (talk) 00:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
277760 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277759 +++$+++ 277759 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.239008100E09 +++$+++ Let me try to explain my point again.  You claim that your proposed additions are needed to \"make the point that Bush was unqualified...\"  Again, it is not our place to be \"sensational\" or to \"make the point\".  Also, per [[BLP]] rules, material that is controversial requires more than a single source (i.e., one book is ''not enough'').  The additions represent a single author's POV when NPOV is what is called for in a [[BLP]].  Sourcing or not, the information is contentious, and you really need to discuss these types of edits on the talk page, and attempt to gain consensus, before re-inserting them.  One other editor has already reverted your edits citing essentially the same basis as me, so please heed our warnings and seek discussion before insisting on these edits.  Otherwise, I'm afraid, we have little option but to open an entry on the BLP noticeboard or AN\/I.  Let's decrease the rhetoric and work through this, shall we?   +++$+++ :Let me try to explain my point again.  You claim that your proposed additions are needed to "make the point that Bush was unqualified..."  Again, it is not our place to be "sensational" or to "make the point".  Also, per [[BLP]] rules, material that is controversial requires more than a single source (i.e., one book is ''not enough'').  The additions represent a single author's POV when NPOV is what is called for in a [[BLP]].  Sourcing or not, the information is contentious, and you really need to discuss these types of edits on the talk page, and attempt to gain consensus, before re-inserting them.  One other editor has already reverted your edits citing essentially the same basis as me, so please heed our warnings and seek discussion before insisting on these edits.  Otherwise, I'm afraid, we have little option but to open an entry on the BLP noticeboard or AN/I.  Let's decrease the rhetoric and work through this, shall we?  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle|talk]]) 01:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
277761 +++$+++ The Magnificent Clean-keeper +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277759 +++$+++ 277760 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.239014580E09 +++$+++ I would like to put my two cents in here. If I (w\/o even checking the sources) am blinded by POV... I guess it was written in POV (language).-- +++$+++ ::I would like to put my two cents in here. If I (w/o even checking the sources) am blinded by POV... I guess it was written in POV (language).--[[User:The Magnificent Clean-keeper|The Magnificent Clean-keeper]] ([[User talk:The Magnificent Clean-keeper|talk]]) 03:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
277762 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277759 +++$+++ 277761 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.239015120E09 +++$+++ I might suggest you also make this point at [[User talk:Zeamays]], as we collectively try to work through this editing dispute, as I am not sure Zeamays will see your comment here.   +++$+++ :::I might suggest you also make this point at [[User talk:Zeamays]], as we collectively try to work through this editing dispute, as I am not sure Zeamays will see your comment here.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 03:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
277763 +++$+++ The Magnificent Clean-keeper +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277759 +++$+++ 277762 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.239016440E09 +++$+++ I just did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AZeamays&diff=282033260&oldid=282031158].-- +++$+++ ::::I just did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AZeamays&diff=282033260&oldid=282031158].--[[User:The Magnificent Clean-keeper|The Magnificent Clean-keeper]] ([[User talk:The Magnificent Clean-keeper|talk]]) 04:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
277764 +++$+++ Zeamays +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277759 +++$+++ 277759 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.239048420E09 +++$+++ I moved this discussion to the George W. Bush talk page. -- +++$+++ * I moved this discussion to the George W. Bush talk page. --[[User:Zeamays|Zeamays]] ([[User talk:Zeamays|talk]]) 13:07, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

15616 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15616 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-04 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.294152600E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Fred_Bauder}} in your upload log]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''' per Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]], [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F4|F4]]. If the image is [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrighted]] and [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|non-free]], '''the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)''' per [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] criterion [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F7|F7]]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Fred_Bauder}} in your upload log]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''' per Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]], [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F4|F4]]. If the image is [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrighted]] and [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|non-free]], '''the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)''' per [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] criterion [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F7|F7]]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 06:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
15617 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15616 +++$+++ 15616 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.294178460E09 +++$+++ I have left a note on the page for this image on Commons. I don't know much about the image other than that it is old and a picture of Stalin as a young man; which makes it both interesting and in the public domain.  +++$+++ :I have left a note on the page for this image on Commons. I don't know much about the image other than that it is old and a picture of Stalin as a young man; which makes it both interesting and in the public domain. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 14:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

526891 +++$+++ Archtransit +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526891 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-24 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.195960140E09 +++$+++ {{Resolved}} Aksi great is attempting but hasn't done it in a long time.   Thank you anyway +++$+++ {{Resolved}} Aksi great is attempting but hasn't done it in a long time.   Thank you anyway[[User:Archtransit|Archtransit]] ([[User talk:Archtransit|talk]]) 19:09, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
526892 +++$+++ Archtransit +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526891 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-24 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.195960560E09 +++$+++ Who is Michael Hardy?  A user name or a real name.  If Aksi great has difficulty, will you help.  Thank you.  +++$+++ ::Who is Michael Hardy?  A user name or a real name.  If Aksi great has difficulty, will you help.  Thank you. [[User:Archtransit|Archtransit]] ([[User talk:Archtransit|talk]]) 19:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
526893 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526891 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-24 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.195961340E09 +++$+++ Looks like I was mistaken. [[User:Michael Hardy]] is an admin who made an edit to DYK template just after you wrote the original note here.  I went to check on the last update, to make sure there wasn't an edit happening and noted his edit. (But it wasn't actually an update to DYK.)  It has been awhile since I've done a DYK update, but I'll be glad to lend whatever help I can to Aksi. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::: Looks like I was mistaken. [[User:Michael Hardy]] is an admin who made an edit to DYK template just after you wrote the original note here.  I went to check on the last update, to make sure there wasn't an edit happening and noted his edit. (But it wasn't actually an update to DYK.)  It has been awhile since I've done a DYK update, but I'll be glad to lend whatever help I can to Aksi. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 19:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

15621 +++$+++ The Blade of the Northern Lights +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-09 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.297299960E09 +++$+++ Leaving the [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations\/Timneu22|new twist]] aside for the moment (at least until a CU gets there); I was unaware that RfCs about users could be conducted on their own talkpages.  [[WP:RFC\/U]] has instructions on how to start one; this ran rather contrary to that.  I'm failing to see the logic in starting what essentially amounts to an RfCU on that user's talkpage; am I missing something here?   +++$+++ Leaving the [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Timneu22|new twist]] aside for the moment (at least until a CU gets there); I was unaware that RfCs about users could be conducted on their own talkpages.  [[WP:RFC/U]] has instructions on how to start one; this ran rather contrary to that.  I'm failing to see the logic in starting what essentially amounts to an RfCU on that user's talkpage; am I missing something here?  [[User:The Blade of the Northern Lights|The Blade of the Northern Lights]]  ([[User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights|<font face="MS Mincho" color="black">話して下さい</font>]]) 17:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
15622 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15621 +++$+++ 15621 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.297322520E09 +++$+++ No, I think you're right. Sorry about that; I haven't done a Requests for comment for many years.  +++$+++ :No, I think you're right. Sorry about that; I haven't done a Requests for comment for many years. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 23:22, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
15623 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15621 +++$+++ 15621 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.297324980E09 +++$+++ [posted on Timneu's page; repeating it here]. Hi Fred, the instructions for user RfCs are at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/User conduct]]. There has to be a clear description of the dispute, with two certifiers within 48 hours. Both certifiers must produce diffs showing that they tried but failed to resolve the dispute; without those, they can't certify. That's followed by a statement from the party, and then statements in their own sections from others. It's important to stick to the process to make sure there's enough evidence and concern for an RfC, which can be fairly traumatic  for the user, and therefore not to be initiated lightly. <font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ :[posted on Timneu's page; repeating it here]. Hi Fred, the instructions for user RfCs are at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct]]. There has to be a clear description of the dispute, with two certifiers within 48 hours. Both certifiers must produce diffs showing that they tried but failed to resolve the dispute; without those, they can't certify. That's followed by a statement from the party, and then statements in their own sections from others. It's important to stick to the process to make sure there's enough evidence and concern for an RfC, which can be fairly traumatic  for the user, and therefore not to be initiated lightly. <font color="black">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="gold">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|TALK|]]</font><font color="lime">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|CONTRIBS]]</font></sup></small> 00:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
15624 +++$+++ Ncmvocalist +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15621 +++$+++ 15621 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.297342020E09 +++$+++ You need to revise your evidence if you wish to remain as certifier for the reasons I note [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment\/Timneu22#Minimum_requirements_need_to_be_satisfied_.28before_each_editor_starts_to_comment_on_the_substance.29|here]]. That is, if you've merely notified him and assisted in drafting the RfC\/U, but haven't (yet) really made an attempt to discuss this directly with Timneu22 (like Kudpung evidently has), you would not qualify as a certifier for the RfC\/U to proceed; that role would fall on Kudpung Whq & Jayen.  +++$+++ * You need to revise your evidence if you wish to remain as certifier for the reasons I note [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Timneu22#Minimum_requirements_need_to_be_satisfied_.28before_each_editor_starts_to_comment_on_the_substance.29|here]]. That is, if you've merely notified him and assisted in drafting the RfC/U, but haven't (yet) really made an attempt to discuss this directly with Timneu22 (like Kudpung evidently has), you would not qualify as a certifier for the RfC/U to proceed; that role would fall on Kudpung Whq & Jayen. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 04:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

539912 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-26 08:16:00 +++$+++ 1.288106160E09 +++$+++ you are right, my hook was really weak :-( . Actually, I think that the predestined hook for this article would be one related to the legend of the frying fishes. I tried to summarize it to an acceptable length, but it comes out always too long. I saw your alternative hooks and the answer of Constantine, for me are OK. If in the meantime I will manage to shorten the fish hook  reasonably, I will write it together with the others and then we can discuss what is the best. Otherwise, let's go on with the marriage. Actually, I never saw one father-in-law destroying the marriage church of his son, and the other rebuilding it in so little time :-) Many thanks and cheers,  +++$+++ you are right, my hook was really weak :-( . Actually, I think that the predestined hook for this article would be one related to the legend of the frying fishes. I tried to summarize it to an acceptable length, but it comes out always too long. I saw your alternative hooks and the answer of Constantine, for me are OK. If in the meantime I will manage to shorten the fish hook  reasonably, I will write it together with the others and then we can discuss what is the best. Otherwise, let's go on with the marriage. Actually, I never saw one father-in-law destroying the marriage church of his son, and the other rebuilding it in so little time :-) Many thanks and cheers, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 08:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
539913 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539912 +++$+++ 539912 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.288122180E09 +++$+++ thanks a lot again! I made a minor change: if for you is ok, I think that we can adopt it! Cheers,  +++$+++ :thanks a lot again! I made a minor change: if for you is ok, I think that we can adopt it! Cheers, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 12:43, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
539914 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539912 +++$+++ 539913 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.288124580E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Cheers, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 13:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
539915 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539912 +++$+++ 539914 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.288125840E09 +++$+++ 1-1, Todor. :-) It should be \"The City\". What if we do so? [[Fall of Constantinople|conquest]] of [[Names_of_Istanbul#Other_Byzantine_names|The City]] . Very sophisticated, and a lot of info in two links...A hook in the hook! :-) It is true that this is a Greek Usage, but on a (beautiful) Italian book on the subject which I bought last week it is named \"La Citt\xe0\"...The usage is becoming universal...Cheers,  +++$+++ :::1-1, Todor. :-) It should be "The City". What if we do so? [[Fall of Constantinople|conquest]] of [[Names_of_Istanbul#Other_Byzantine_names|The City]] . Very sophisticated, and a lot of info in two links...A hook in the hook! :-) It is true that this is a Greek Usage, but on a (beautiful) Italian book on the subject which I bought last week it is named "La Città"...The usage is becoming universal...Cheers, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 13:44, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
539916 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539912 +++$+++ 539915 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.288183320E09 +++$+++ OK Todor, Thanks! Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::OK Todor, Thanks! Cheers, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 05:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

15625 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-13 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.297586940E09 +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes-->  +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 00:49, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
15626 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15625 +++$+++ 15625 +++$+++ 2011-02-13 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.297587060E09 +++$+++ Extensive material quoted from the biography of the subject on the website of Arlington National Cemetery in in the public domain as a work of an employee of the United States government done in performance of their duties.  +++$+++ :Extensive material quoted from the biography of the subject on the website of Arlington National Cemetery in in the public domain as a work of an employee of the United States government done in performance of their duties. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 00:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
15627 +++$+++ WikiDan61 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15625 +++$+++ 15626 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.297715040E09 +++$+++ Actually, no.  The main page of http:\/\/www.arlingtoncemetery.net\/ contains a clear claim of copyright.  This site is ''not'' maintained by the US Government, but is a privately run non-profit. <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :: Actually, no.  The main page of http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/ contains a clear claim of copyright.  This site is ''not'' maintained by the US Government, but is a privately run non-profit. <font color="green">[[User:WikiDan61|WikiDan61]]</font><font color="green" size="5px"></font><sup>[[User talk:WikiDan61|ChatMe!]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiDan61|ReadMe!!]]</sub> 12:24, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

15628 +++$+++ WikiDan61 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-14 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.297715100E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of [[:Joseph Abel Haskin|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or \"db\", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Joseph Abel Haskin|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  <!-- Template:Db-copyvio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of [[:Joseph Abel Haskin|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Joseph Abel Haskin|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  <!-- Template:Db-copyvio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <font color="green">[[User:WikiDan61|WikiDan61]]</font><font color="green" size="5px"></font><sup>[[User talk:WikiDan61|ChatMe!]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiDan61|ReadMe!!]]</sub> 12:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
15629 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15628 +++$+++ 15628 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.297719780E09 +++$+++ I understand your rationale on the talk page of [[Joseph Abel Haskin]], however, the site explicitly claims copyright. Based upon you r arguments, it is possible they do not have the rights to do so, but I want to err on the side of caution, and either obtain permission, or make sure to stick to PD sources. Secondarily, even with permission, we normally rewrite material, or identify it as quoted, so a rewrite is needed in any case.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ :I understand your rationale on the talk page of [[Joseph Abel Haskin]], however, the site explicitly claims copyright. Based upon you r arguments, it is possible they do not have the rights to do so, but I want to err on the side of caution, and either obtain permission, or make sure to stick to PD sources. Secondarily, even with permission, we normally rewrite material, or identify it as quoted, so a rewrite is needed in any case.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 13:43, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

277773 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-07 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.239088620E09 +++$+++ (unindent and EC X 3 - I'm slow on the draw) Tarc, although I didn't agree with QOB's making the change in the first place, given that QOB made it twice in good faith I would make the exact same argument to you in reverse, that correcting or getting frustrated over such a thing causes more of a fuss than it is worth.  Also, technically, things like closing summaries, section headings, and the like are not really considered a personal talk page contribution.  Editing them is not a talk page violation - there is a guideline or essay page somehwere that says that, possibly [[WP:TALK]].  They are best kept as neutral, uncontroversial, and informational as possible so: (1) rewriting them in a good faith effort to achieve that goal should be okay, and (2) even if they're not perfect, they're not worth fighting over.  QOB is obviously editing in good faith to help out here, so please don't call those edits vandalism.   +++$+++ (unindent and EC X 3 - I'm slow on the draw) Tarc, although I didn't agree with QOB's making the change in the first place, given that QOB made it twice in good faith I would make the exact same argument to you in reverse, that correcting or getting frustrated over such a thing causes more of a fuss than it is worth.  Also, technically, things like closing summaries, section headings, and the like are not really considered a personal talk page contribution.  Editing them is not a talk page violation - there is a guideline or essay page somehwere that says that, possibly [[WP:TALK]].  They are best kept as neutral, uncontroversial, and informational as possible so: (1) rewriting them in a good faith effort to achieve that goal should be okay, and (2) even if they're not perfect, they're not worth fighting over.  QOB is obviously editing in good faith to help out here, so please don't call those edits vandalism.  [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 00:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
277774 +++$+++ Bobblehead +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277773 +++$+++ 277773 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.239089040E09 +++$+++ Seriously, both of you need to go to your opposite corners here. QueenofBattle, if you fundamentally alter a closing note, then you should, at a minimum, remove the previous author's signature, or, preferably, replace their signature with yours. Both of you should also stop edit warring. If QoB is going to get their knickers in a twist over the wording of the closure message, then there isn't any harm in leaving the altered version unless it displays incorrect information. -- +++$+++ :Seriously, both of you need to go to your opposite corners here. QueenofBattle, if you fundamentally alter a closing note, then you should, at a minimum, remove the previous author's signature, or, preferably, replace their signature with yours. Both of you should also stop edit warring. If QoB is going to get their knickers in a twist over the wording of the closure message, then there isn't any harm in leaving the altered version unless it displays incorrect information. --[[User:Bobblehead|Bobblehead]] <sup>[[User talk:Bobblehead|(rants)]]</sup> 00:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
277775 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277773 +++$+++ 277774 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.239089340E09 +++$+++ It did display incorrect information, but that's not why I altered it.  I altered it to achieve closure ''without prejudice.''  A simple \"Discussion closed by consensus\" will go much farther than a statement a kin to \"We are closing this discussion, but I'm going to make my point one last time.\"  There is so much hostility around the Obama articles, and so little air, so as to make collaborative editing nearly impossible.  Oh, and I'm sorry I didn't remove your signature when I altered the closing note; no harm intended.   +++$+++ ::It did display incorrect information, but that's not why I altered it.  I altered it to achieve closure ''without prejudice.''  A simple "Discussion closed by consensus" will go much farther than a statement a kin to "We are closing this discussion, but I'm going to make my point one last time."  There is so much hostility around the Obama articles, and so little air, so as to make collaborative editing nearly impossible.  Oh, and I'm sorry I didn't remove your signature when I altered the closing note; no harm intended.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 00:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
277776 +++$+++ Tarc +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277773 +++$+++ 277775 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.239093720E09 +++$+++ No, it did not display incorrect information; it is an idiot right-wing talking point with no basis in reality.  Your altering another users comment was a bad-faith edit.  If I see such edits I revert them, and will not hesitate to do so if I see them again.  Please do not clutter my talk page with \"talk back\" templates either.  Thank you.  +++$+++ :::No, it did not display incorrect information; it is an idiot right-wing talking point with no basis in reality.  Your altering another users comment was a bad-faith edit.  If I see such edits I revert them, and will not hesitate to do so if I see them again.  Please do not clutter my talk page with "talk back" templates either.  Thank you. [[User:Tarc|Tarc]] ([[User talk:Tarc|talk]]) 01:42, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
277777 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277773 +++$+++ 277776 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.239098040E09 +++$+++ Good grief.  Sometimes in life people just find a way to expose themselves for what they really are, don't they?  Fascinating [snicker].  Oh well, thanks for your willingness to help and for the collaborative nature you have exhibited.  In the future, though, maybe you shouldn't edit while enjoying the, umm, fire-water if you are unable to hold your liquor and control your temper.   +++$+++ ::::Good grief.  Sometimes in life people just find a way to expose themselves for what they really are, don't they?  Fascinating [snicker].  Oh well, thanks for your willingness to help and for the collaborative nature you have exhibited.  In the future, though, maybe you shouldn't edit while enjoying the, umm, fire-water if you are unable to hold your liquor and control your temper.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 02:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
277778 +++$+++ Bobblehead +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277773 +++$+++ 277777 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.239104040E09 +++$+++ There has never been a travel ban for US citizens in Pakistan. There was a travel warning at the time due to the Soviet's Afghan War and the imposition of Sharia law in Pakistan, but there has certainly never been an outright banning of US citizens entering Pakistan. An outright travel ban, like the ban on travel to Cuba, can only be enacted by Congress. Travel warnings are just that, warnings. Any US citizen can ignore them at will, just don't go crying to the state department when you leave the country a foot shorter than when you arrived. -- +++$+++ :::::There has never been a travel ban for US citizens in Pakistan. There was a travel warning at the time due to the Soviet's Afghan War and the imposition of Sharia law in Pakistan, but there has certainly never been an outright banning of US citizens entering Pakistan. An outright travel ban, like the ban on travel to Cuba, can only be enacted by Congress. Travel warnings are just that, warnings. Any US citizen can ignore them at will, just don't go crying to the state department when you leave the country a foot shorter than when you arrived. --[[User:Bobblehead|Bobblehead]] <sup>[[User talk:Bobblehead|(rants)]]</sup> 04:34, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
277779 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277773 +++$+++ 277778 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.239137400E09 +++$+++ Fine, fine.  I am not going to argue the subtleties of travel restrictions on US citizens from some 27 years ago, primarily, because that is not the point.  ''The point'' is that we have got to turn the rhetoric down, and I mean ''way'' down, including those who think they [[Wikipedia:Ownership of articles|own the article]] and are protecting it from evil fringe theories hell bent on destroying the free world.  Obama traveled to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport, which he admits in his book.  So, what.  The conversation quickly got off that track and on to another where [[User:Tarc|Tarc]] and others proceeded to knock the shit out of some poor editor, and then stupidly try to pick a fight with me.  It's like being the guy in the bar fight trying to break things up, and getting sucker punched instead.  It does ''nothing'' to advance, well, anything.  Best,  +++$+++ ::::::Fine, fine.  I am not going to argue the subtleties of travel restrictions on US citizens from some 27 years ago, primarily, because that is not the point.  ''The point'' is that we have got to turn the rhetoric down, and I mean ''way'' down, including those who think they [[Wikipedia:Ownership of articles|own the article]] and are protecting it from evil fringe theories hell bent on destroying the free world.  Obama traveled to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport, which he admits in his book.  So, what.  The conversation quickly got off that track and on to another where [[User:Tarc|Tarc]] and others proceeded to knock the shit out of some poor editor, and then stupidly try to pick a fight with me.  It's like being the guy in the bar fight trying to break things up, and getting sucker punched instead.  It does ''nothing'' to advance, well, anything.  Best, [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 13:50, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

539919 +++$+++ ZjarriRrethues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539919 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-28 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.288301040E09 +++$+++ I started the article and according to the sources I found he was a Bulgarian, but an IP changed it to Macedonia [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lazar_Poptrajkov&diff=393428891&oldid=383995971], so you might want to verify that.--<span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ I started the article and according to the sources I found he was a Bulgarian, but an IP changed it to Macedonia [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lazar_Poptrajkov&diff=393428891&oldid=383995971], so you might want to verify that.--<span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:ZjarriRrethues|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''ZjarriRrethues''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:ZjarriRrethues|talk]]</sup> 14:24, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
539920 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539919 +++$+++ 539919 +++$+++ 2010-10-28 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.288301880E09 +++$+++ Hi! This is regular vandalism, though it should be a better idea to follow something like [[Yane Sandanski]] for the lead section and the ethnicity qualifier. <span style=\"text-align: center; clear: both; font-family:Georgia, serif; font-size: 10pt; font-variant: small-caps; font-style: normal;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ : Hi! This is regular vandalism, though it should be a better idea to follow something like [[Yane Sandanski]] for the lead section and the ethnicity qualifier. <span style="text-align: center; clear: both; font-family:Georgia, serif; font-size: 10pt; font-variant: small-caps; font-style: normal;"> — [[User:TodorBozhinov|Toдor]] [[User talk:TodorBozhinov|Boжinov]] —</span> 14:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
539921 +++$+++ ZjarriRrethues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539919 +++$+++ 539920 +++$+++ 2010-10-28 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.288302840E09 +++$+++ That's probably the most npov that could be created to approach the Macedonian opinion.--<span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ ::That's probably the most npov that could be created to approach the Macedonian opinion.--<span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:ZjarriRrethues|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''ZjarriRrethues''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:ZjarriRrethues|talk]]</sup> 14:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

15632 +++$+++ Kevin +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-24 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.298619120E09 +++$+++ Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  +++$+++ Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. [[User:Kevin|Kevin]] ([[User talk:Kevin|talk]]) 23:32, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
15633 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15632 +++$+++ 15632 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.299094500E09 +++$+++ We can try talking to them on the talk pages. It is not the references or information that is at issue but the debate mode. However, part of the information, indeed nearly all of it is already in the article.  +++$+++ :We can try talking to them on the talk pages. It is not the references or information that is at issue but the debate mode. However, part of the information, indeed nearly all of it is already in the article. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 11:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

567908 +++$+++ JohnnyAlbert10 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-24 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.198490580E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry but my cousin got into my comp and started editing wikipedia while I left my comp on, and apparently he ended up vandalizing your page, I reverted it, im really sorry. I should be more careful next time. \u2014''' +++$+++ I'm sorry but my cousin got into my comp and started editing wikipedia while I left my comp on, and apparently he ended up vandalizing your page, I reverted it, im really sorry. I should be more careful next time. —'''[[User:JohnnyAlbert10|<font color="red">J</font><font color="blue">A</font><font color="gray">10</font>]]''' <small>[[User talk:JohnnyAlbert10|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JohnnyAlbert10|Contribs]]</small> 02:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
567909 +++$+++ JohnnyAlbert10 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567908 +++$+++ 567908 +++$+++ 2007-12-24 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.198492080E09 +++$+++ Yes I was. Problem is that firefox doesn't log me off when I leave wikipedia, so anyone can edit using my account, but I'm going to start logging out for now on. I still don't know why my cousin vandalized your page, he said something about youtube, he's very immature. \u2014''' +++$+++ :Yes I was. Problem is that firefox doesn't log me off when I leave wikipedia, so anyone can edit using my account, but I'm going to start logging out for now on. I still don't know why my cousin vandalized your page, he said something about youtube, he's very immature. —'''[[User:JohnnyAlbert10|<font color="red">J</font><font color="blue">A</font><font color="gray">10</font>]]''' <small>[[User talk:JohnnyAlbert10|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JohnnyAlbert10|Contribs]]</small> 02:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
567910 +++$+++ JohnnyAlbert10 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567908 +++$+++ 567909 +++$+++ 2007-12-24 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.198493580E09 +++$+++ Yes that is his page, and thank you very much for the barnstar. He can be very stubborn sometimes and  is always using my computer without permission. I certainly have learned something today about wikipedia safety and firefox along with that, thank you. \u2014''' +++$+++ ::Yes that is his page, and thank you very much for the barnstar. He can be very stubborn sometimes and  is always using my computer without permission. I certainly have learned something today about wikipedia safety and firefox along with that, thank you. —'''[[User:JohnnyAlbert10|<font color="red">J</font><font color="blue">A</font><font color="gray">10</font>]]''' <small>[[User talk:JohnnyAlbert10|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JohnnyAlbert10|Contribs]]</small> 02:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

614275 +++$+++ Slrubenstein +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-11 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.273625100E09 +++$+++ You seem to have dropped out of discussions here.  But I have placed a proposed alternative to one section of the policy [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Neutral_point_of_view#Proposed_alternative_to_.22Explaining_the_Neutral_Point_of_View here] - there have been some constructive suggestions by a couple of other editors and since posting it I have made some alterations to it in response to those comments.  I hope you will have time to review the proposal and, if you think it is a step in the right direction, see if you can suggest any improvements - or of course if you don't like it register your view.  +++$+++ You seem to have dropped out of discussions here.  But I have placed a proposed alternative to one section of the policy [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Neutral_point_of_view#Proposed_alternative_to_.22Explaining_the_Neutral_Point_of_View here] - there have been some constructive suggestions by a couple of other editors and since posting it I have made some alterations to it in response to those comments.  I hope you will have time to review the proposal and, if you think it is a step in the right direction, see if you can suggest any improvements - or of course if you don't like it register your view. [[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]]   |  [[User talk:Slrubenstein|Talk]] 17:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
614276 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614275 +++$+++ 614275 +++$+++ 2010-05-11 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.273635600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up, I'm a bit rushed at the present and while the principle of clarification is good, am a bit uncomfortable with the current proposal. Will review and come back on this, will try to make a placeholder statement in the interim. Your reminder about this is much appreciated,  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up, I'm a bit rushed at the present and while the principle of clarification is good, am a bit uncomfortable with the current proposal. Will review and come back on this, will try to make a placeholder statement in the interim. Your reminder about this is much appreciated, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

541721 +++$+++ J Greb +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541721 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-20 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.216589700E09 +++$+++ -  +++$+++ - [[User:J Greb|J Greb]] ([[User talk:J Greb|talk]]) 14:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
541722 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541721 +++$+++ 541721 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.216678560E09 +++$+++ What's most frustrating, to me, is that Moshikal more than occasionally ''does'' upload images that are useful and correctly sized.  A good deal of his\/her edits are genuinely valuable to the project.  Yet despite being reached out to by several editors, Moshikal seems intent on driving the slow road to blocksville.   +++$+++ :What's most frustrating, to me, is that Moshikal more than occasionally ''does'' upload images that are useful and correctly sized.  A good deal of his/her edits are genuinely valuable to the project.  Yet despite being reached out to by several editors, Moshikal seems intent on driving the slow road to blocksville.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 15:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

277781 +++$+++ Soxwon +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277781 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-07 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.239139740E09 +++$+++ I don't know if you had a chance to look at my suggestions or not and was hoping to get an opinion.  +++$+++ I don't know if you had a chance to look at my suggestions or not and was hoping to get an opinion. [[User:Soxwon|Soxwon]] ([[User talk:Soxwon|talk]]) 14:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
277782 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277781 +++$+++ 277781 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.239140160E09 +++$+++ Oh good grief, I am sorry.  I think your changes look good.  If you make those edits, I don't think you'll get any pushback, but the editing environment on that page is especially nasty now, so no promises.  But, I support them.  I said this on the talk page: I think marriage, kids and state of origin are already in the infobox (unlike all the other chronology), but it can't hurt to add it to the lede. Best,  +++$+++ :Oh good grief, I am sorry.  I think your changes look good.  If you make those edits, I don't think you'll get any pushback, but the editing environment on that page is especially nasty now, so no promises.  But, I support them.  I said this on the talk page: I think marriage, kids and state of origin are already in the infobox (unlike all the other chronology), but it can't hurt to add it to the lede. Best, [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 14:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
277783 +++$+++ Soxwon +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277781 +++$+++ 277782 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.239140220E09 +++$+++ Thanx, I noticed a slew of edits after I finished so I figured 'probably got buried.' :).  +++$+++ ::Thanx, I noticed a slew of edits after I finished so I figured 'probably got buried.' :). [[User:Soxwon|Soxwon]] ([[User talk:Soxwon|talk]]) 14:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

15639 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-11 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.302577680E09 +++$+++ Please attend to it quickly. It's been almost a week. ''' +++$+++ Please attend to it quickly. It's been almost a week. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#2F4F4F;color:#FFF;font-family:Comic Sans MS"> bahamut0013</span>]]'''<span style="background:#DCDCDC"><small>[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<sup style="color:#000;margin-left:-1px">words</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<sub style="color:#000;margin-left:-16px">deeds</sub>]]</small></span> 20:08, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
15640 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15639 +++$+++ 15639 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.302631920E09 +++$+++ I've resent it. ''' +++$+++ :I've resent it. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#2F4F4F;color:#FFF;font-family:Comic Sans MS"> bahamut0013</span>]]'''<span style="background:#DCDCDC"><small>[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<sup style="color:#000;margin-left:-1px">words</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<sub style="color:#000;margin-left:-16px">deeds</sub>]]</small></span> 11:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

483204 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483204 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-07 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.189158660E09 +++$+++ What, pray tell, is this guy on about? Or just plain \"on\"? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Bobblehead]  +++$+++ What, pray tell, is this guy on about? Or just plain "on"? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bobblehead] [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 02:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
483205 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483204 +++$+++ 483204 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.189158900E09 +++$+++ Heh heh.  Looks like he's just quite excited about fixing links to disambiguation pages.  Good for him!  :)  \u2014 +++$+++ :Heh heh.  Looks like he's just quite excited about fixing links to disambiguation pages.  Good for him!  :)  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 02:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
483206 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483204 +++$+++ 483205 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.189161060E09 +++$+++ Well, as long as he's doing something legit, fine. What caught my eye was his edit to the [[Roger Miller]] page. I am almost certain that Miller died from smoking-related throat cancer, not from esophageal cancer as such.  +++$+++ ::Well, as long as he's doing something legit, fine. What caught my eye was his edit to the [[Roger Miller]] page. I am almost certain that Miller died from smoking-related throat cancer, not from esophageal cancer as such. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 03:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
483207 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483204 +++$+++ 483206 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.189162380E09 +++$+++ Technically, there's no such thing as \"throat cancer\".  \"Throat\" is more of a region, not an organ.  One would technically have cancer in the espohagus or thyroid or larynx, etc.  (And yes, I do work for a cancer research organization - and no, I am not medically trained in any way.  Knowledge by osmosis.)  \u2014 +++$+++ :::Technically, there's no such thing as "throat cancer".  "Throat" is more of a region, not an organ.  One would technically have cancer in the espohagus or thyroid or larynx, etc.  (And yes, I do work for a cancer research organization - and no, I am not medically trained in any way.  Knowledge by osmosis.)  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

277786 +++$+++ Keithicus +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-30 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.241146560E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Keithicus|Keithicus]] ([[User talk:Keithicus|talk]]) 19:56, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
277787 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277786 +++$+++ 277786 +++$+++ 2009-04-30 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.241147580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for asking.  In short, the answer is \"yes\".  While I appreciate what you were trying to accomplish, the way you went about it is not how it is done at Wikipedia.  So, what can we do?  First, familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia believes are [[WP:fringe|finge theories]], as the definition can be different than what we may normally associate with fringe theories.  Also, material needs to be [[WP:RS|reliably sourced]], which is a higher standard than being \"addressed by mainstream media.\"  Most often, information like this that is controversial, requires even better sourcing both in quality of sources (so, no blogs or forums) and quantity (e.g., has it been addressed by several mainstream media outlets, or merely by one or two releatively minor ones?).  The next question is one of relevance to the FEMA article.  I think if you want to include a mention of this conspiracy theory in another article about \"conspiracy theories\", that'd be OK. If you want to start a new article about \"government conspiracy theories\" or \"conspiracy theories involving government agencies\" or even \"FEMA camps controversy\" (assuming there isn't already one), and include actual material (rather than a redirect) there, that too would probably be OK.  But, the sourcing for inclusion in here just doesn't measure up and isn't really relevant to ''this'' article.  So, better said, if the focus of the FEMA article was about the evidence of conspiracy theories and the conspiracy theorists, then the text can delve into those subjects.  But, this article is about FEMA, so the focus should stay on FEMA and not on theories about conspiracies involving FEMA.  Also, discussing planned edits on the article's talk page first may help them be received by the Wikipedia community easier.  Hope my thoughts help.  Let me know if I can help further.   +++$+++ :Thanks for asking.  In short, the answer is "yes".  While I appreciate what you were trying to accomplish, the way you went about it is not how it is done at Wikipedia.  So, what can we do?  First, familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia believes are [[WP:fringe|finge theories]], as the definition can be different than what we may normally associate with fringe theories.  Also, material needs to be [[WP:RS|reliably sourced]], which is a higher standard than being "addressed by mainstream media."  Most often, information like this that is controversial, requires even better sourcing both in quality of sources (so, no blogs or forums) and quantity (e.g., has it been addressed by several mainstream media outlets, or merely by one or two releatively minor ones?).  The next question is one of relevance to the FEMA article.  I think if you want to include a mention of this conspiracy theory in another article about "conspiracy theories", that'd be OK. If you want to start a new article about "government conspiracy theories" or "conspiracy theories involving government agencies" or even "FEMA camps controversy" (assuming there isn't already one), and include actual material (rather than a redirect) there, that too would probably be OK.  But, the sourcing for inclusion in here just doesn't measure up and isn't really relevant to ''this'' article.  So, better said, if the focus of the FEMA article was about the evidence of conspiracy theories and the conspiracy theorists, then the text can delve into those subjects.  But, this article is about FEMA, so the focus should stay on FEMA and not on theories about conspiracies involving FEMA.  Also, discussing planned edits on the article's talk page first may help them be received by the Wikipedia community easier.  Hope my thoughts help.  Let me know if I can help further.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 20:13, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

526895 +++$+++ Archtransit +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-25 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.196041620E09 +++$+++ DYK is 10 hours late, which is almost 2 cycles missed.  I;ve moved hooks to the next update.  Can you help and place them on the main page?  Thank you.  +++$+++ DYK is 10 hours late, which is almost 2 cycles missed.  I;ve moved hooks to the next update.  Can you help and place them on the main page?  Thank you. [[User:Archtransit|Archtransit]] ([[User talk:Archtransit|talk]]) 17:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
526896 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526895 +++$+++ 526895 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.196065320E09 +++$+++ I started to do the update &mdash; fixing the photo and protecting it.  Looks like [[User:Blnguyen]] stepped in and did the update.  &mdash;  +++$+++ : I started to do the update &mdash; fixing the photo and protecting it.  Looks like [[User:Blnguyen]] stepped in and did the update.  &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 00:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

277788 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-05 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.241586600E09 +++$+++ Whether or not you agree with the changes, is it really a good idea to perpetuate the edit war? I suggest you self-revert and then discuss on the talk page. --  +++$+++ Whether or not you agree with the changes, is it really a good idea to perpetuate the edit war? I suggest you self-revert and then discuss on the talk page. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 22:10, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
277789 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277788 +++$+++ 277788 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.241592660E09 +++$+++ I am without opinion with regard to either set of edits, and I wasn't aware there was an edit war being fought.  I'll just leave it at that for others to sort out, as I see little need to self-revert.  Thanks.   +++$+++ :I am without opinion with regard to either set of edits, and I wasn't aware there was an edit war being fought.  I'll just leave it at that for others to sort out, as I see little need to self-revert.  Thanks.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 23:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
277790 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277788 +++$+++ 277789 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.241593260E09 +++$+++ I only mention it because the previous edit was also a reversion, so it might have been wiser to check the edit history first. It shows a string of reversions. I recommended the self revert because you have added ''back'' the contentious material, which is contrary to the established convention of discussion before addition that has been adopted in the Obama-related articles.  --  +++$+++ ::I only mention it because the previous edit was also a reversion, so it might have been wiser to check the edit history first. It shows a string of reversions. I recommended the self revert because you have added ''back'' the contentious material, which is contrary to the established convention of discussion before addition that has been adopted in the Obama-related articles.  -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 00:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
277791 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277788 +++$+++ 277790 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.241593560E09 +++$+++ Fair enough.  I'll let those that find the material contentious work it out, as what my reversion had the effect of adding back seemed pretty benign.  Plus, I reserve the right to follow the Wikipedia convention of [[WP:BOLD|being bold]], rather than the convention of the Obama-related articles.  +++$+++ :::Fair enough.  I'll let those that find the material contentious work it out, as what my reversion had the effect of adding back seemed pretty benign.  Plus, I reserve the right to follow the Wikipedia convention of [[WP:BOLD|being bold]], rather than the convention of the Obama-related articles. [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 00:06, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
277792 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277788 +++$+++ 277791 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.241600100E09 +++$+++ There's nothing wrong with being bold, unless you are \"boldly reverting\" or \"boldly ignoring\" the article probation that has made it necessary to build consensus before adding anything potentially contentious. --  +++$+++ ::::There's nothing wrong with being bold, unless you are "boldly reverting" or "boldly ignoring" the article probation that has made it necessary to build consensus before adding anything potentially contentious. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 01:55, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
277793 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277788 +++$+++ 277792 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.241600220E09 +++$+++ Thinking about what I said, I just realized that would make an ''awesome'' mantra, wouldn't it? '''''Consensus''' before '''contentious'''''. I should trademark that phrase or something! --  +++$+++ :::::Thinking about what I said, I just realized that would make an ''awesome'' mantra, wouldn't it? '''''Consensus''' before '''contentious'''''. I should trademark that phrase or something! -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 01:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
277794 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277788 +++$+++ 277793 +++$+++ 2009-05-06 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.241649420E09 +++$+++ I think you should trademark it, so I can take the normal-and-customary 45% of the profits. I crack myself up.   +++$+++ ::::::I think you should trademark it, so I can take the normal-and-customary 45% of the profits. I crack myself up.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 15:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

539934 +++$+++ Sulmuesi +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-22 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.290417000E09 +++$+++ Can you please spend a couple of minutes with [[Skanderbeg]]? I am little by little trying to get him to GA and am asking Malleus, Cplakidas, Ning-ning and you, if you find too many things which are wrong before I bring it to GA in December. I merged some paragraphs today to make it flow chronologically, and also wrote the long lede, but I am aware that some references are still missing, or are from encyclopedias, in addition wording is far from perfect. Still I would like you to just spend a couple of minutes and tell me what do you see wrong with the article. Thank you for your precious time. -- +++$+++ Can you please spend a couple of minutes with [[Skanderbeg]]? I am little by little trying to get him to GA and am asking Malleus, Cplakidas, Ning-ning and you, if you find too many things which are wrong before I bring it to GA in December. I merged some paragraphs today to make it flow chronologically, and also wrote the long lede, but I am aware that some references are still missing, or are from encyclopedias, in addition wording is far from perfect. Still I would like you to just spend a couple of minutes and tell me what do you see wrong with the article. Thank you for your precious time. --[[User:Sulmuesi|Sulmuesi]] ([[User talk:Sulmuesi|talk]]) 01:10, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
539935 +++$+++ Sulmuesi +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539934 +++$+++ 539934 +++$+++ 2010-11-22 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.290491340E09 +++$+++ Todor: you and Cplakidas are the two admins that would make Balkans an oasis of peace. Your advise and his are extremely precious. I really think I'll follow all of them. One thing we're very weak at as wikiproject are the maps. The article would be much better off with images of all the places that are mentioned, and for now the map of the [[League of Lezhe]], is kind of shitty, forgive my French. The rest of what you say, is very valuable. I'll start making treasure of it, before someone picks the article up as a reviewer. -- +++$+++ :Todor: you and Cplakidas are the two admins that would make Balkans an oasis of peace. Your advise and his are extremely precious. I really think I'll follow all of them. One thing we're very weak at as wikiproject are the maps. The article would be much better off with images of all the places that are mentioned, and for now the map of the [[League of Lezhe]], is kind of shitty, forgive my French. The rest of what you say, is very valuable. I'll start making treasure of it, before someone picks the article up as a reviewer. --[[User:Sulmuesi|Sulmuesi]] ([[User talk:Sulmuesi|talk]]) 21:49, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

15648 +++$+++ Collect +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15648 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-30 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.304193660E09 +++$+++ Is the indefinite ban on TFD editing articles relating to any minority peoples in the Soviet Union inclusive of article talk pages or user talk pages where such issues are discussed, or only to actual edits on those articles proper?  And is the term \"minority peoples\" broadly defined (that is, including nations where were formerly part of the USSR, but where the peoples are not \"minority\" in the current nation?   I am not trying to be a nudge, but wanted to be entirely clear. Cheers.  +++$+++ Is the indefinite ban on TFD editing articles relating to any minority peoples in the Soviet Union inclusive of article talk pages or user talk pages where such issues are discussed, or only to actual edits on those articles proper?  And is the term "minority peoples" broadly defined (that is, including nations where were formerly part of the USSR, but where the peoples are not "minority" in the current nation?   I am not trying to be a nudge, but wanted to be entirely clear. Cheers. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 13:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
15649 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15648 +++$+++ 15648 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.304195040E09 +++$+++ The trouble originated at [[Talk:Lia Looveer]] which is an excellent example of the sort of trouble which results from TFD's acting in this way, so, yes, it includes talk pages. The term minority peoples of the Soviet Union includes every nationality other than Russian which was included in the Soviet Union such as Latvians, Estonians, Karelians, Baltic and Volga Germans, Crimean Tatars, Ukrainians, Lithuanians, particularly those who were impacted by mass deportation and the Nazi invasion. By its literal terms it includes all Soviet minorities, but many were not affected by those events and would be unlikely to be the target of ideological attacks against anti-communist emigres. Actually it probably should include Russian emigres also who are also potential victims of this sort of guilt by association, sometimes simply because they were prisoners of war.  +++$+++ :The trouble originated at [[Talk:Lia Looveer]] which is an excellent example of the sort of trouble which results from TFD's acting in this way, so, yes, it includes talk pages. The term minority peoples of the Soviet Union includes every nationality other than Russian which was included in the Soviet Union such as Latvians, Estonians, Karelians, Baltic and Volga Germans, Crimean Tatars, Ukrainians, Lithuanians, particularly those who were impacted by mass deportation and the Nazi invasion. By its literal terms it includes all Soviet minorities, but many were not affected by those events and would be unlikely to be the target of ideological attacks against anti-communist emigres. Actually it probably should include Russian emigres also who are also potential victims of this sort of guilt by association, sometimes simply because they were prisoners of war. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 13:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

539937 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539937 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-25 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.290715320E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 12:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
539938 +++$+++ Ericoides +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539937 +++$+++ 539937 +++$+++ 2010-11-25 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.290720720E09 +++$+++ Lovely article, congratulations.  +++$+++ :Lovely article, congratulations. [[User:Ericoides|Ericoides]] ([[User talk:Ericoides|talk]]) 13:32, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
539939 +++$+++ Ericoides +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539937 +++$+++ 539938 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.290798300E09 +++$+++ No problem. I used to live in Sofia in the early 1970s (on Marshal Tolbukhin, if you know it) and your articles bring back some very happy memories.  +++$+++ ::No problem. I used to live in Sofia in the early 1970s (on Marshal Tolbukhin, if you know it) and your articles bring back some very happy memories. [[User:Ericoides|Ericoides]] ([[User talk:Ericoides|talk]]) 11:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

277795 +++$+++ Abrazame +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-24 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.243166340E09 +++$+++ No, it would seem the mistakes are yours.  That word was the only thing affected by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Presidency_of_George_W._Bush&diff=prev&oldid=291509190| this edit] of yours, an edit you made not two days ago.  I was on the fence about posting here prior to receiving your post on my talk page, but now that you've flat-out denied something you did so recently, would you explain this?   +++$+++ No, it would seem the mistakes are yours.  That word was the only thing affected by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Presidency_of_George_W._Bush&diff=prev&oldid=291509190| this edit] of yours, an edit you made not two days ago.  I was on the fence about posting here prior to receiving your post on my talk page, but now that you've flat-out denied something you did so recently, would you explain this?  [[User:Abrazame|Abrazame]] ([[User talk:Abrazame|talk]]) 04:59, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
277796 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277795 +++$+++ 277795 +++$+++ 2009-05-24 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.243166820E09 +++$+++ Sure.  The explanation is really quite simple.  If you would go back a few edits before mine to see that the word \"moderized\" has been in the text for quite a while.  Some ANON IP edited it to, well, \"edited\" with no explanation.  I merely reverted that edit.  There is no \"clearly\" anything about my reversion.  But, I understand how you saw it the way you did; knees jerk quickly around Wikipedia sometimes.   +++$+++ :Sure.  The explanation is really quite simple.  If you would go back a few edits before mine to see that the word "moderized" has been in the text for quite a while.  Some ANON IP edited it to, well, "edited" with no explanation.  I merely reverted that edit.  There is no "clearly" anything about my reversion.  But, I understand how you saw it the way you did; knees jerk quickly around Wikipedia sometimes.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 05:07, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
277797 +++$+++ Abrazame +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277795 +++$+++ 277796 +++$+++ 2009-05-24 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.243168860E09 +++$+++ Despite your position on editors' knees, you are evidently well enough versed with the English language and political rhetoric to identify the POV violation in the way the word \"modernized\" was being used there.  I didn't claim that your clear violation was for something you made up out of thin air yourself (the word and its tone, unsupported as it is by the ''New York Times'' article referenced for that section).  Your violation came when your response to a valid correction of this violation of Wikipedia policy was to revert back from the accurate reading to the NPOV violation.  It's our responsibility to make an editorial judgement as to whether an edit is unsummarized because it's obvious what the point of the edit is, if it is unsummarized because someone is unfamiliar with editorial etiquette, or if it is unsummarized because the editor is trying to get away with something.  Your own summary was equally barren of explanation.  And you concede the thorough murkiness of your reversion.  So your issue with my edit is what, then?   +++$+++ ::Despite your position on editors' knees, you are evidently well enough versed with the English language and political rhetoric to identify the POV violation in the way the word "modernized" was being used there.  I didn't claim that your clear violation was for something you made up out of thin air yourself (the word and its tone, unsupported as it is by the ''New York Times'' article referenced for that section).  Your violation came when your response to a valid correction of this violation of Wikipedia policy was to revert back from the accurate reading to the NPOV violation.  It's our responsibility to make an editorial judgement as to whether an edit is unsummarized because it's obvious what the point of the edit is, if it is unsummarized because someone is unfamiliar with editorial etiquette, or if it is unsummarized because the editor is trying to get away with something.  Your own summary was equally barren of explanation.  And you concede the thorough murkiness of your reversion.  So your issue with my edit is what, then?  [[User:Abrazame|Abrazame]] ([[User talk:Abrazame|talk]]) 05:41, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
277798 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277795 +++$+++ 277797 +++$+++ 2009-05-24 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.243169820E09 +++$+++ Oh, good grief.  I count the word \"violation\" four times here.  I might suggest you simmer down a bit in the hunt for all things that ''may'' comprise an editing violation, lest you can produce your Wikipedia-arbiter-of-judgmentally-determined-violations badge and ID card.  You said yourself, that is our responsibility to make a judgement as to the gist of an unsummarized edit.  It did just that, and summarized it not by adding an edit summary, but by clicking the \"minor edit\" button (I mean, it's one word, after all).  I exercised my judgement, with which you disagree.  It is no more than that.  Conversation over.  The exit is to the left.   +++$+++ :::Oh, good grief.  I count the word "violation" four times here.  I might suggest you simmer down a bit in the hunt for all things that ''may'' comprise an editing violation, lest you can produce your Wikipedia-arbiter-of-judgmentally-determined-violations badge and ID card.  You said yourself, that is our responsibility to make a judgement as to the gist of an unsummarized edit.  It did just that, and summarized it not by adding an edit summary, but by clicking the "minor edit" button (I mean, it's one word, after all).  I exercised my judgement, with which you disagree.  It is no more than that.  Conversation over.  The exit is to the left.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 05:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
277799 +++$+++ Abrazame +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277795 +++$+++ 277798 +++$+++ 2009-05-24 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.243172040E09 +++$+++ You're the one who came into my talk page in the first place.  Your suggestions that my knee was jerking and that I need to \"simmer down\" truly don't upset me but I do note them as a choice by you to personalize this.  Perhaps the fact that I used the word \"violation\" four times was because you weren't addressing that aspect.  You still aren't, so am I to interpret your knee as locked, and you as in support of such a POV term?  Declaring that you're done with a conversation you began and yet have contributed nothing substantive to is hardly the exchange of ideas and opinions that defines a conversation.  An editorial discussion is only productive if both parties not only make points (unclear though you establish yours as being) but are receptive and responsive to points.  Your responses have been to establish a timeline, obvious and unnecessary given the edit history.  The emptiness of your summary means that I must inquire why you restored such a term, as it's both obviously POV and should be most mature people's guess would not be in the ''NYT'' ref, even if they didn't read it to determine that.  In other words, what if not a knee-jerk of your own caused you to restore that word which was unsupported by the ref?   +++$+++ ::::You're the one who came into my talk page in the first place.  Your suggestions that my knee was jerking and that I need to "simmer down" truly don't upset me but I do note them as a choice by you to personalize this.  Perhaps the fact that I used the word "violation" four times was because you weren't addressing that aspect.  You still aren't, so am I to interpret your knee as locked, and you as in support of such a POV term?  Declaring that you're done with a conversation you began and yet have contributed nothing substantive to is hardly the exchange of ideas and opinions that defines a conversation.  An editorial discussion is only productive if both parties not only make points (unclear though you establish yours as being) but are receptive and responsive to points.  Your responses have been to establish a timeline, obvious and unnecessary given the edit history.  The emptiness of your summary means that I must inquire why you restored such a term, as it's both obviously POV and should be most mature people's guess would not be in the ''NYT'' ref, even if they didn't read it to determine that.  In other words, what if not a knee-jerk of your own caused you to restore that word which was unsupported by the ref?  [[User:Abrazame|Abrazame]] ([[User talk:Abrazame|talk]]) 06:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

378942 +++$+++ Jezhotwells +++$+++ Rlendog +++$+++ 378942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-25 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.285471860E09 +++$+++ The article [[Love Minus Zero\/No Limit]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[Image:Symbol wait.svg|20px]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See [[Talk:Love Minus Zero\/No Limit]] for things which need to be addressed.  +++$+++ The article [[Love Minus Zero/No Limit]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[Image:Symbol wait.svg|20px]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See [[Talk:Love Minus Zero/No Limit]] for things which need to be addressed. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 20:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
378943 +++$+++ Kohoutek1138 +++$+++ Rlendog +++$+++ 378942 +++$+++ 378942 +++$+++ 2010-09-26 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.285534380E09 +++$+++ Well done on getting this passed and awarded GA status! -- +++$+++ :Well done on getting this passed and awarded GA status! --[[User:Kohoutek1138|Kohoutek1138]] ([[User talk:Kohoutek1138|talk]]) 13:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
378944 +++$+++ Moisejp +++$+++ Rlendog +++$+++ 378942 +++$+++ 378943 +++$+++ 2010-09-26 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.285535100E09 +++$+++ Good job, Riendog! I'm impressed how you and Kohoutek1138 keep steadily churning out the GAs at a rate a lot faster than I'd ever be able to. I hope to get back to \"Mr. Tambourine Man\" at some point relatively soon, but have been a bit busy in real life. Take care and talk to you again soon!  +++$+++ ::Good job, Riendog! I'm impressed how you and Kohoutek1138 keep steadily churning out the GAs at a rate a lot faster than I'd ever be able to. I hope to get back to "Mr. Tambourine Man" at some point relatively soon, but have been a bit busy in real life. Take care and talk to you again soon! [[User:Moisejp|Moisejp]] ([[User talk:Moisejp|talk]]) 14:05, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

89991 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ Kaguya-chan +++$+++ 89991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-31 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.293815520E09 +++$+++ I was just heading onto the page to see if I could add a photo (from the Door tour) as, the last time I visited the page, it was in a dire state, only to find you've done a stunning job of redoing the article! Seriously, it's brilliant. Which brings me to my next point: sometime at the end of next month, I intend to actually listen to the ''Opheliac Companion'' I got so long ago. Do you reckon there's a chance of collaboration? ''' +++$+++ I was just heading onto the page to see if I could add a photo (from the Door tour) as, the last time I visited the page, it was in a dire state, only to find you've done a stunning job of redoing the article! Seriously, it's brilliant. Which brings me to my next point: sometime at the end of next month, I intend to actually listen to the ''Opheliac Companion'' I got so long ago. Do you reckon there's a chance of collaboration? '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 09:12, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
89992 +++$+++ Kaguya-chan +++$+++ Kaguya-chan +++$+++ 89991 +++$+++ 89991 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.294265640E09 +++$+++ Thank you. In all honesty, redoing the article would have been so much more difficult if the administrators hadn't locked it down until September. So much of the credit really goes to them. Recent pictures are always welcome and a collaboration sounds wonderful.  +++$+++ :Thank you. In all honesty, redoing the article would have been so much more difficult if the administrators hadn't locked it down until September. So much of the credit really goes to them. Recent pictures are always welcome and a collaboration sounds wonderful. [[User:Kaguya-chan|Kaguya-chan]] ([[User talk:Kaguya-chan#top|talk]]) 14:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

15661 +++$+++ Favonian +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15661 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-05 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.304629380E09 +++$+++ Hi Fred.  I noticed that you blocked {{ipuser|69.126.238.184}} indefinitely.  The IP has certainly earned a lengthy block for its BLP transgressions, but it was my impression that IPs are never blocked indefinitely.  Could it be a mistake?  Best,  +++$+++ Hi Fred.  I noticed that you blocked {{ipuser|69.126.238.184}} indefinitely.  The IP has certainly earned a lengthy block for its BLP transgressions, but it was my impression that IPs are never blocked indefinitely.  Could it be a mistake?  Best, [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 14:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
15662 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15661 +++$+++ 15661 +++$+++ 2011-05-05 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.304629860E09 +++$+++ Fixed. Thank you.  +++$+++ :Fixed. Thank you. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 14:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

277806 +++$+++ Cuprum17 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277806 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-15 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.247702400E09 +++$+++ And yes, I do know what the Queen of Battle is... I spent the first 6 years of my military career in the Army. I wasn't in the infantry, but I worked to support them...Hooah!!!  +++$+++ And yes, I do know what the Queen of Battle is... I spent the first 6 years of my military career in the Army. I wasn't in the infantry, but I worked to support them...Hooah!!! [[User:Cuprum17|Cuprum17]] ([[User talk:Cuprum17|talk]]) 17:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
277807 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277806 +++$+++ 277806 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.247702760E09 +++$+++ Thanks Chief, and thanks for your service.  As a member of the Coast Guard Auxiliary, I am proud to support the brave men and women of the USCG.  Best,  +++$+++ :Thanks Chief, and thanks for your service.  As a member of the Coast Guard Auxiliary, I am proud to support the brave men and women of the USCG.  Best, [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 17:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
277808 +++$+++ Cuprum17 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277806 +++$+++ 277807 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.247955420E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the internal link to International Orange that you added to the CG Article. I think it will help to keep the arguements down that have regularly occured on the discussion page about whether it is red or orange in the Racing Stripe.  The CG Color and Coating Manual specfies International Orange, but some joker will come along and edit the page, insisting it should be red.  About half the time they are a Coastie who hasn't bothered to read the manual. Keep up the good work....You would make a good Coast Guardsman, Active or Reserve...give it some consideration.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for the internal link to International Orange that you added to the CG Article. I think it will help to keep the arguements down that have regularly occured on the discussion page about whether it is red or orange in the Racing Stripe.  The CG Color and Coating Manual specfies International Orange, but some joker will come along and edit the page, insisting it should be red.  About half the time they are a Coastie who hasn't bothered to read the manual. Keep up the good work....You would make a good Coast Guardsman, Active or Reserve...give it some consideration. [[User:Cuprum17|Cuprum17]] ([[User talk:Cuprum17|talk]]) 15:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
277809 +++$+++ Cuprum17 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277806 +++$+++ 277808 +++$+++ 2009-09-21 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.253584680E09 +++$+++ Well, QoB, I joined the Coast Guard Reserve when I was 42 leaving 18 years to get 20 years of service for retirement in that included 3 years of Active Duty with the U.S. Army.  At 44, they might let you join the Reserves IF... you had four years of Active duty or Selected Reserve time in any of the Armed Services.  You have to be able to get 20 GOOD years of service in before age 60.  I made it with 47 days to spare, but I had to make sure during those 18 years that I participated in at least 75% of my scheduled drills for the year and my two weeks of active duty for training each year.  I always managed the drill at least 90% of my scheduled drills.  The is check with a recruiter that KNOWS THE RESERVE SIDE OF THE RECRUITING BUSINESS.  Many Coast Guard Recruiters are only interested in recruiting for the active side of the house and don't know all the ins and outs of the reserve recruiting rules.  If you don't do anything, I want you to know that your Aux. time with the Coast Guard is certainly appreciated.  I know the local Flotilla personnel where I was stationed certainly helped us with our Boating Safety mission and with Regatta patrol work. Thanks for your reply and stay Semper Paratus!  +++$+++ :::Well, QoB, I joined the Coast Guard Reserve when I was 42 leaving 18 years to get 20 years of service for retirement in that included 3 years of Active Duty with the U.S. Army.  At 44, they might let you join the Reserves IF... you had four years of Active duty or Selected Reserve time in any of the Armed Services.  You have to be able to get 20 GOOD years of service in before age 60.  I made it with 47 days to spare, but I had to make sure during those 18 years that I participated in at least 75% of my scheduled drills for the year and my two weeks of active duty for training each year.  I always managed the drill at least 90% of my scheduled drills.  The is check with a recruiter that KNOWS THE RESERVE SIDE OF THE RECRUITING BUSINESS.  Many Coast Guard Recruiters are only interested in recruiting for the active side of the house and don't know all the ins and outs of the reserve recruiting rules.  If you don't do anything, I want you to know that your Aux. time with the Coast Guard is certainly appreciated.  I know the local Flotilla personnel where I was stationed certainly helped us with our Boating Safety mission and with Regatta patrol work. Thanks for your reply and stay Semper Paratus! [[User:Cuprum17|Cuprum17]] ([[User talk:Cuprum17|talk]]) 18:58, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
277810 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277806 +++$+++ 277806 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.247702640E09 +++$+++ I understand your point, but at Wikipedia, we used commonly understood terms, unless linking to the specific application of the term.  So, for example, if you wish to link to [[Defacement (flag)]] in the article, that seems acceptable.  But, remember, you still need a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] for your edits re: the CG Ensign.   +++$+++ :I understand your point, but at Wikipedia, we used commonly understood terms, unless linking to the specific application of the term.  So, for example, if you wish to link to [[Defacement (flag)]] in the article, that seems acceptable.  But, remember, you still need a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] for your edits re: the CG Ensign.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 17:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

15664 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15664 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-07 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.304820360E09 +++$+++ You know, Fred, I always thought you were one of the more clear minded and big picture guys around here, but [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&action=historysubmit&diff=427953186&oldid=427952947 this] is disappointing. You are picking up on a good editor, and ignoring the SPI\/sock issues. This is very much \"lets focus on the letter of the policies and ignore their spirit and the good of the project\" bureaucratic attitude (\"I don't care if you discovered a terrorist nuclear plot, you filled in the wrong form to report this and you'll be fined for that\") that I did not expect from you :( --<sub style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ You know, Fred, I always thought you were one of the more clear minded and big picture guys around here, but [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&action=historysubmit&diff=427953186&oldid=427952947 this] is disappointing. You are picking up on a good editor, and ignoring the SPI/sock issues. This is very much "lets focus on the letter of the policies and ignore their spirit and the good of the project" bureaucratic attitude ("I don't care if you discovered a terrorist nuclear plot, you filled in the wrong form to report this and you'll be fined for that") that I did not expect from you :( --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</sub> 19:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
15665 +++$+++ Aprock +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15664 +++$+++ 15664 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.304824920E09 +++$+++ @Fred.  If you're going to plead sloth, then it might be best to withdraw the proposed result.  It's hard to see how superficial treatments of AE disputes can lead to good outcomes.  +++$+++ :@Fred.  If you're going to plead sloth, then it might be best to withdraw the proposed result.  It's hard to see how superficial treatments of AE disputes can lead to good outcomes. [[User:Aprock|aprock]] ([[User talk:Aprock|talk]]) 20:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
15666 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15664 +++$+++ 15664 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.304831520E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Fred, for the new more constructive suggestions. My faith in you is being restored again :) --<sub style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Thank you, Fred, for the new more constructive suggestions. My faith in you is being restored again :) --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</sub> 22:12, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
15667 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15664 +++$+++ 15664 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.304831940E09 +++$+++ Lot of work involved. Puuh!  +++$+++ :Lot of work involved. Puuh! [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 22:19, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
15668 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15664 +++$+++ 15667 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.304832180E09 +++$+++ That's why we pay you the big wikibucks, you know... --<sub style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::That's why we pay you the big wikibucks, you know... --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</sub> 22:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

483208 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483208 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-07 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.189226940E09 +++$+++ Apparently the \"'Ammerin' Ank\" stuff is for real. [http:\/\/www.courierpress.com\/news\/2007\/sep\/06\/no-longer-a-curiosity-rick-ammerin-ank-ankiel\/] That doesn't mean it will be an enduring nickname, though.  +++$+++ Apparently the "'Ammerin' Ank" stuff is for real. [http://www.courierpress.com/news/2007/sep/06/no-longer-a-curiosity-rick-ammerin-ank-ankiel/] That doesn't mean it will be an enduring nickname, though. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 21:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
483209 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483208 +++$+++ 483208 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.189227120E09 +++$+++ Ohhh.  Ya know what?  I didn't even understand how that section was set up.  Now I get it.  I thought the Ammerin Ank thing was somehow tied to Roy Hobbs.  Never mind.  I'm not a big fan of the whole nickname thing anyway but at least it makes more sense now.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Ohhh.  Ya know what?  I didn't even understand how that section was set up.  Now I get it.  I thought the Ammerin Ank thing was somehow tied to Roy Hobbs.  Never mind.  I'm not a big fan of the whole nickname thing anyway but at least it makes more sense now.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 21:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
483210 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483208 +++$+++ 483209 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.189228500E09 +++$+++ Notice I'm not actually recommending putting that nickname back. And numerous ballplayers have been likened to Roy Hobbs for a short while, so there's no point in pointing that back, either.  +++$+++ ::Notice I'm not actually recommending putting that nickname back. And numerous ballplayers have been likened to Roy Hobbs for a short while, so there's no point in pointing that back, either. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 22:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
483211 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483208 +++$+++ 483210 +++$+++ 2007-09-09 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.189373760E09 +++$+++ Given the HGH allegations, that ought to neutralize references to anything \"Natural\".  +++$+++ :::Given the HGH allegations, that ought to neutralize references to anything "Natural". [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 14:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

539954 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539954 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-21 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.292983440E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 18:04, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
539955 +++$+++ Codrinb +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539954 +++$+++ 539954 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.292991960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the detailed [[User talk:Codrinb#Decree of Dionysopolis|reply]] and clarifications. Makes sense.-- +++$+++ : Thanks for the detailed [[User talk:Codrinb#Decree of Dionysopolis|reply]] and clarifications. Makes sense.--[[User:Codrinb|Codrinb]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 20:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

277811 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-20 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.248151800E09 +++$+++ In response to your concerns, the underlying issue on the Obama talk page is that some obvious trolls \/ sockpuppets are provoking trouble.  After a long period without such incidents, several new \/ [[WP:SPA]] accounts started unproductive discussions in almost identical tone and syntax, and brought similar bogus complaints to [[WP:AN\/I]].  If it had been me I would have politely explained to the suspicious new editors that the material is inappropriate, asked if there are any objections, and if none (other than the suspicious accounts) I would have closed the discussions politely after a few days.  However, that's not what happened.  Several people watching the page closed them rapidly, in a less than ideal way, accusing them of being trolls and sockpuppets in the closing comments, and in one case a seemingly unaware \/ inexperienced editor was taunting one of the trolls on their user page.  That kind of stuff from both sides is best toned down quietly and with as little fuss and antagonism as possible.  Seeing the page in that state, and aware that someone recently increased the archive time considerably, I decided to tone down the drama by grouping and collapsing the already-collapsed discussions.  That's a judgment call.  If you disagree, you're free to discuss on my talk page or some other meta page, but getting into a disagreement on the Obama talk page over how to handle trolls, and saying that it looks like censorship, etc., is only going to make the situation more heated.  There have already been 2-3 AN\/I reports, and now what looks like an Arbcom motion, over what should be an extremely simple, straightforward issue of dealing with a handful of inapt discussions started by bogus accounts.   +++$+++ In response to your concerns, the underlying issue on the Obama talk page is that some obvious trolls / sockpuppets are provoking trouble.  After a long period without such incidents, several new / [[WP:SPA]] accounts started unproductive discussions in almost identical tone and syntax, and brought similar bogus complaints to [[WP:AN/I]].  If it had been me I would have politely explained to the suspicious new editors that the material is inappropriate, asked if there are any objections, and if none (other than the suspicious accounts) I would have closed the discussions politely after a few days.  However, that's not what happened.  Several people watching the page closed them rapidly, in a less than ideal way, accusing them of being trolls and sockpuppets in the closing comments, and in one case a seemingly unaware / inexperienced editor was taunting one of the trolls on their user page.  That kind of stuff from both sides is best toned down quietly and with as little fuss and antagonism as possible.  Seeing the page in that state, and aware that someone recently increased the archive time considerably, I decided to tone down the drama by grouping and collapsing the already-collapsed discussions.  That's a judgment call.  If you disagree, you're free to discuss on my talk page or some other meta page, but getting into a disagreement on the Obama talk page over how to handle trolls, and saying that it looks like censorship, etc., is only going to make the situation more heated.  There have already been 2-3 AN/I reports, and now what looks like an Arbcom motion, over what should be an extremely simple, straightforward issue of dealing with a handful of inapt discussions started by bogus accounts.  [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 21:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
277812 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277811 +++$+++ 277811 +++$+++ 2009-07-20 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.248152700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the explanation.  I respect your judgment, but disagree with your actions.  I think that grouping everything up only adds fuel to a quickly smoldering anew fire.  I try to live by the motto that \"we can't control how people treat us, only how we react.\"  I think the appropriate course of action is to close the unproductive discussions (although not prematurely), and let them be archived.  Anyone reading the talk page can easily see who are the trolls, who is making an ass of themselves (with snarky closing comments), and who is being overly partisan.  The rhetoric can be amped down by avoiding the name-calling and finger-pointing.  For example, if one is a troll, I don't need to be told they are a troll by another; I can see it for myself.  It's interesting to me that many of the editors who are so quick to close \"unproductive\" discussions are nowhere to be found in the edit history of the main article, hence what looks like some to be an [[WP:OWN|overly protective]] type of censorship.  So, I'll leave it with this discussion and my comments already included in the article's talk page.  But, please consider if there is a better, more transparent way to accomplish your goals.  Best,  +++$+++ :Thanks for the explanation.  I respect your judgment, but disagree with your actions.  I think that grouping everything up only adds fuel to a quickly smoldering anew fire.  I try to live by the motto that "we can't control how people treat us, only how we react."  I think the appropriate course of action is to close the unproductive discussions (although not prematurely), and let them be archived.  Anyone reading the talk page can easily see who are the trolls, who is making an ass of themselves (with snarky closing comments), and who is being overly partisan.  The rhetoric can be amped down by avoiding the name-calling and finger-pointing.  For example, if one is a troll, I don't need to be told they are a troll by another; I can see it for myself.  It's interesting to me that many of the editors who are so quick to close "unproductive" discussions are nowhere to be found in the edit history of the main article, hence what looks like some to be an [[WP:OWN|overly protective]] type of censorship.  So, I'll leave it with this discussion and my comments already included in the article's talk page.  But, please consider if there is a better, more transparent way to accomplish your goals.  Best, [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 22:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
277813 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277811 +++$+++ 277812 +++$+++ 2009-07-20 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.248153540E09 +++$+++ Sure... Thanks for your thoughts, and I tend to agree. But I came upon it when it was already messy. What I was really closing were the unhelpful closing comments.  I didn't think we needed to see people accuse each other of being trolls there on the page.  Just like the discussions themselves, those comments could have been ignored.  But they weren't.  Better just to move on.  I think we have to ask (in a friendly way) that people not disparage each other, not even the trolls, on article talk pages.   +++$+++ ::Sure... Thanks for your thoughts, and I tend to agree. But I came upon it when it was already messy. What I was really closing were the unhelpful closing comments.  I didn't think we needed to see people accuse each other of being trolls there on the page.  Just like the discussions themselves, those comments could have been ignored.  But they weren't.  Better just to move on.  I think we have to ask (in a friendly way) that people not disparage each other, not even the trolls, on article talk pages.  [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 22:19, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
277814 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277811 +++$+++ 277813 +++$+++ 2009-07-20 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.248154380E09 +++$+++ Sounds good.  We are in agreement.   +++$+++ :::Sounds good.  We are in agreement.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 22:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

15669 +++$+++ Boothello +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-08 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.304855100E09 +++$+++ Please see my comment [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=428027093 here]. I did not first become active at Wikipedia in November 2010, November is just when I registered an account and stopped vandalizing. Before that I'd been active here since July 2009. I didn't want to mention this for obvious reasons, it's embarrassing. But if people are going to accuse me of being a sockpuppet because they think I suddenly showed up in November, I prefer being called a reformed vandal rather than a sock. +++$+++ Please see my comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=428027093 here]. I did not first become active at Wikipedia in November 2010, November is just when I registered an account and stopped vandalizing. Before that I'd been active here since July 2009. I didn't want to mention this for obvious reasons, it's embarrassing. But if people are going to accuse me of being a sockpuppet because they think I suddenly showed up in November, I prefer being called a reformed vandal rather than a sock.[[User:Boothello|Boothello]] ([[User talk:Boothello|talk]]) 04:45, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
15670 +++$+++ Volunteer Marek +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15669 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-08 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.304856060E09 +++$+++ For the record, once again, I never accused you, nor anyone else of being a sock puppet. What I said was that a number of editors active on the articles were: 1) SPAs (which fits) and 2) their accounts were created soon after the conclusion of the R\/I case (which also fits). To be precise, I actually suspected meat puppetry more than sock puppetry - based on previous comments and discussions, like the AN\/I discussion I linked to in my statement. This was (were) also statements which referred to a set of editors not you in particular (in fact I stated explicitly that it is conceivable that one of these accounts began editing when it did by accident - what was NOT conceivable was that all of them did). +++$+++ :::For the record, once again, I never accused you, nor anyone else of being a sock puppet. What I said was that a number of editors active on the articles were: 1) SPAs (which fits) and 2) their accounts were created soon after the conclusion of the R/I case (which also fits). To be precise, I actually suspected meat puppetry more than sock puppetry - based on previous comments and discussions, like the AN/I discussion I linked to in my statement. This was (were) also statements which referred to a set of editors not you in particular (in fact I stated explicitly that it is conceivable that one of these accounts began editing when it did by accident - what was NOT conceivable was that all of them did).[[User:Volunteer Marek|Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 05:01, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

277815 +++$+++ User F203 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-21 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.248243660E09 +++$+++ I am in the process of discussing it with the editor involved.  He doesn't disagree yet.  If he agrees with me, it stays off.  Please do not create fights or drama.  If he really wants it, it goes back up.  He did not realize that Obama talk page is so controversial.   +++$+++ I am in the process of discussing it with the editor involved.  He doesn't disagree yet.  If he agrees with me, it stays off.  Please do not create fights or drama.  If he really wants it, it goes back up.  He did not realize that Obama talk page is so controversial.  [[User:User F203|User F203]] ([[User talk:User F203|talk]]) 23:21, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
277816 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277815 +++$+++ 277815 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.248243840E09 +++$+++ It doesn't matter why you refractored his comments.  If he wants to delete them, he may (or strike through them), but you should not.  Talk pages are records of the discussion, and we don't do anything in secret here, even when well intentioned.  So, ''I'' object to you deleting his comments from the talk page and you should not do so.   +++$+++ :It doesn't matter why you refractored his comments.  If he wants to delete them, he may (or strike through them), but you should not.  Talk pages are records of the discussion, and we don't do anything in secret here, even when well intentioned.  So, ''I'' object to you deleting his comments from the talk page and you should not do so.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 23:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

539960 +++$+++ Darthvadar92 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-30 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.293740820E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of [[:Mihail Gerdjikov|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or \"db\", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Mihail Gerdjikov|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these administrators]] to request that the administrator [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom -->  +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of [[:Mihail Gerdjikov|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Mihail Gerdjikov|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these administrators]] to request that the administrator [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Darthvadar92|Darthvadar92]] ([[User talk:Darthvadar92|talk]]) 12:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
539961 +++$+++ JamesBWatson +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539960 +++$+++ 539960 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.293744840E09 +++$+++ I have declined this speedy deletion nomination, as the page was a redirect, not an article.  +++$+++ *I have declined this speedy deletion nomination, as the page was a redirect, not an article. [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson|talk]]) 13:34, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

15673 +++$+++ Collect +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-11 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.305136980E09 +++$+++ Does it fall within Digwuren?   You might wish to note the current discussion wherein one person appears to feel that anyone who moved to \"Nazi Germany\" (albeit away from the Soviets) is, perforce, able to be implicated as a \"Nazi collaborator.\"  As no RS makes the claim, I am a tad dubious, and have posted on NPOV\/N about this, but an impartial admin might reasonably step in (TFD has naught to do with this).  Cheers.  +++$+++ Does it fall within Digwuren?   You might wish to note the current discussion wherein one person appears to feel that anyone who moved to "Nazi Germany" (albeit away from the Soviets) is, perforce, able to be implicated as a "Nazi collaborator."  As no RS makes the claim, I am a tad dubious, and have posted on NPOV/N about this, but an impartial admin might reasonably step in (TFD has naught to do with this).  Cheers. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 11:03, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
15674 +++$+++ Collect +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15673 +++$+++ 15673 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.305144240E09 +++$+++ which I regard as clearly an insinuation of some sort (and possibly a threat) that I have a \"reason\" to protect Nazi collaborators.  As such is a totally off-the-wall sort of accusation on his part, I am quite affronted and have asked him to redact such apparent charges.  Cheers.  +++$+++ : which I regard as clearly an insinuation of some sort (and possibly a threat) that I have a "reason" to protect Nazi collaborators.  As such is a totally off-the-wall sort of accusation on his part, I am quite affronted and have asked him to redact such apparent charges.  Cheers. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 13:04, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

15675 +++$+++ Dictabeard +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-12 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.305236220E09 +++$+++ I just read [[User_talk:Kasuga#File:Wikipe-tan.27s_past.2C_now_and_future2.png_listed_for_deletion|this]] and could not find any [[Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion\/2011_March_21#File:Wikipe-tan.27s_past.2C_now_and_future2.png|discussion]] about it on March 21. Was it possibly held on a different date? There's also no notification of the debate on the image itself.  +++$+++ I just read [[User_talk:Kasuga#File:Wikipe-tan.27s_past.2C_now_and_future2.png_listed_for_deletion|this]] and could not find any [[Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_March_21#File:Wikipe-tan.27s_past.2C_now_and_future2.png|discussion]] about it on March 21. Was it possibly held on a different date? There's also no notification of the debate on the image itself. [[User:Dictabeard|DB]] ([[User talk:Dictabeard|talk]]) 14:37, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
15676 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15675 +++$+++ 15675 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.305236460E09 +++$+++ I think the deletion debate may have occurred on Commons.  +++$+++ :I think the deletion debate may have occurred on Commons. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 14:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
15677 +++$+++ EdJohnston +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15675 +++$+++ 15676 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.305258000E09 +++$+++ See [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests\/File:Wikipe-tan's past, now and future2.png]], which closed with Keep.  +++$+++ ::See [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wikipe-tan's past, now and future2.png]], which closed with Keep. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 20:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

277821 +++$+++ User F203 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277821 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-21 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.248244440E09 +++$+++ I have asked that you be blocked if you create drama.  +++$+++ I have asked that you be blocked if you create drama. [[User:User F203|User F203]] ([[User talk:User F203|talk]]) 23:34, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
277822 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277821 +++$+++ 277821 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.248244800E09 +++$+++ I'll treat the last comment as a bit of humor, as I'm confident that's how you meant it. ;)  +++$+++ :I'll treat the last comment as a bit of humor, as I'm confident that's how you meant it. ;) [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 23:40, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

277824 +++$+++ Victor9876 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277824 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-26 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.248615420E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Victor9876|Victor9876]] ([[User talk:Victor9876|talk]]) 06:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
277825 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277824 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-26 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.248648720E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for the source.  I edited the passage a bit and moved it down to the exisiting discussion of his time in Williamson County.   +++$+++ ::OK, thanks for the source.  I edited the passage a bit and moved it down to the exisiting discussion of his time in Williamson County.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 15:52, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
277826 +++$+++ Victor9876 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277824 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-26 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.248656160E09 +++$+++ It appears this task force issue is an article unto itself. My impression is that a separate article could go more into detail about how Lucas' pathology and the pathology of the Texas Rangers created the story and myths about Lucas.-- +++$+++ :::It appears this task force issue is an article unto itself. My impression is that a separate article could go more into detail about how Lucas' pathology and the pathology of the Texas Rangers created the story and myths about Lucas.--[[User:Victor9876|Victor9876]] ([[User talk:Victor9876|talk]]) 17:56, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

15681 +++$+++ EdJohnston +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-23 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.306144980E09 +++$+++ Hi Fred. Could you look at [[User:EdJohnston\/Sandbox]] which is my proposal to reorganize the log from [[WP:TROUBLES]]. You were on the Committee at the time, and you could say whether I've stated the restrictions properly. I have added a new section called 'Guide to enforcement' at the top. I wanted to do this because the log at [[Wikipedia:TROUBLES#Log of blocks, bans, and probations]] was out of date order, and new items were being added by admins in two different sections. I have also asked NuclearWarfare. Thanks for any feedback you can provide,  +++$+++ Hi Fred. Could you look at [[User:EdJohnston/Sandbox]] which is my proposal to reorganize the log from [[WP:TROUBLES]]. You were on the Committee at the time, and you could say whether I've stated the restrictions properly. I have added a new section called 'Guide to enforcement' at the top. I wanted to do this because the log at [[Wikipedia:TROUBLES#Log of blocks, bans, and probations]] was out of date order, and new items were being added by admins in two different sections. I have also asked NuclearWarfare. Thanks for any feedback you can provide, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 03:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
15682 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15681 +++$+++ 15681 +++$+++ 2011-05-23 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.306147260E09 +++$+++ My God! You've done a lot of good work there.  +++$+++ :My God! You've done a lot of good work there. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 03:41, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

277827 +++$+++ Joker123192 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277827 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-04 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.249436460E09 +++$+++ Exactly how was my edit unconstructive? If you take a look at the articles about other living former presidents, such as Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, it says they \"served as the 39th\/41st\/42nd president of the United States.\" All I was doing was changing the article about George W. Bush to say that he \"served as the 43rd president of the United States\", instead of saying he \"was the 43rd president of the United States.\" That way, it is more similar to the articles about the other former living presidents. -- +++$+++ Exactly how was my edit unconstructive? If you take a look at the articles about other living former presidents, such as Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, it says they "served as the 39th/41st/42nd president of the United States." All I was doing was changing the article about George W. Bush to say that he "served as the 43rd president of the United States", instead of saying he "was the 43rd president of the United States." That way, it is more similar to the articles about the other former living presidents. --[[User:Joker123192|Joker123192]] ([[User talk:Joker123192|talk]]) 18:41, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
277828 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277827 +++$+++ 277827 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.249439340E09 +++$+++ Because in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=George_W._Bush&diff=next&oldid=305846293 this next edit] 60 seconds later you removed sourced material about him being the 46th Governor of Texas.  So, the deletion of sourced, relevant material combined with including the dates he was president, when it is already in the infobox right next to the paragraph, seems unconstructive.   +++$+++ :Because in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_W._Bush&diff=next&oldid=305846293 this next edit] 60 seconds later you removed sourced material about him being the 46th Governor of Texas.  So, the deletion of sourced, relevant material combined with including the dates he was president, when it is already in the infobox right next to the paragraph, seems unconstructive.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 19:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
277829 +++$+++ Joker123192 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277827 +++$+++ 277828 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.249443900E09 +++$+++ Then why don't I just change it to say that he served as the 43rd president of the United States, but still have it include that he was also the 46th Governor of Texas prior to serving as president? Would that be okay?-- +++$+++ ::Then why don't I just change it to say that he served as the 43rd president of the United States, but still have it include that he was also the 46th Governor of Texas prior to serving as president? Would that be okay?--[[User:Joker123192|Joker123192]] ([[User talk:Joker123192|talk]]) 20:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
277830 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277827 +++$+++ 277827 +++$+++ 2009-08-30 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.251683400E09 +++$+++ You will see that I have removed all recipients where no notability is indicated.  While it is honorable that someone apparently related to you was awarded the Legion of Merit, Wikipedia is about notability.  Also, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Presidency_of_Barack_Obama&diff=310926658&oldid=310908409 your vandalism] at [[Presidency of Barack Obama]] doesn't help your cause much.  Thanks.   +++$+++ :You will see that I have removed all recipients where no notability is indicated.  While it is honorable that someone apparently related to you was awarded the Legion of Merit, Wikipedia is about notability.  Also, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Presidency_of_Barack_Obama&diff=310926658&oldid=310908409 your vandalism] at [[Presidency of Barack Obama]] doesn't help your cause much.  Thanks.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 18:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
277831 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277827 +++$+++ 277827 +++$+++ 2009-08-30 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.251684180E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure who you are referring to when you write \"you people\", but I'm confident you are not referring to me.  I am a fiscally conservative capitalist, but I also don't like anyone using Wikipedia as a soapbox, which is what your edits have attempted to do.  I would suggest you refresh yourself with Wiki's [[WP:RS|sourcing policies]].   +++$+++ :I'm not sure who you are referring to when you write "you people", but I'm confident you are not referring to me.  I am a fiscally conservative capitalist, but I also don't like anyone using Wikipedia as a soapbox, which is what your edits have attempted to do.  I would suggest you refresh yourself with Wiki's [[WP:RS|sourcing policies]].  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 19:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

15684 +++$+++ Last Lost +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-03 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.307086380E09 +++$+++ Do you know what happened [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Oxyhydrogen&action=history there]? I see the page history since 14:10, 16 May 2011 stricken out, and on top is the record 22:21, 2 June 2011 Fred Bauder(talk | contribs) m (49,719 bytes) (\u2192Suggestion) > (Therefore I am asking you).  +++$+++ Do you know what happened [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Oxyhydrogen&action=history there]? I see the page history since 14:10, 16 May 2011 stricken out, and on top is the record 22:21, 2 June 2011 Fred Bauder(talk | contribs) m (49,719 bytes) (→Suggestion) > (Therefore I am asking you). [[User:Last Lost|Last Lost]] ([[User talk:Last Lost|talk]]) 00:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
15685 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15684 +++$+++ 15684 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.307086500E09 +++$+++ A passage which violated [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]] was suppressed.  +++$+++ :A passage which violated [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]] was suppressed. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 00:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
15686 +++$+++ Last Lost +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15684 +++$+++ 15685 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.307089500E09 +++$+++ <s>I am afraid, I don't understand: there were 2-3 recent sections which did not discuss any living persons. There was a discussion whether references must be added to the article or not. In particular, the talk thread \"Fraud\" was about section [[Oxyhydrogen#Fringe science and fraud]]. Can you review this talk thread and tell me what exactly was wrong there, or should I merely restart the discussion? <\/s> +++$+++ ::<s>I am afraid, I don't understand: there were 2-3 recent sections which did not discuss any living persons. There was a discussion whether references must be added to the article or not. In particular, the talk thread "Fraud" was about section [[Oxyhydrogen#Fringe science and fraud]]. Can you review this talk thread and tell me what exactly was wrong there, or should I merely restart the discussion? </s>[[User:Last Lost|Last Lost]] ([[User talk:Last Lost|talk]]) 01:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
15687 +++$+++ Last Lost +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15684 +++$+++ 15686 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.307089740E09 +++$+++ Never mind. I thought the page content wwas deleted. Which is not; only last history.  +++$+++ :::Never mind. I thought the page content wwas deleted. Which is not; only last history. [[User:Last Lost|Last Lost]] ([[User talk:Last Lost|talk]]) 01:29, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

526902 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.196966100E09 +++$+++ |} Cheers, ''' +++$+++ |} Cheers, '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 10:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
526903 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526902 +++$+++ 526902 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.197031380E09 +++$+++ Vandalism on Wikipedia is not ignored.  I'm sure that your teacher did not direct students to vandalize the site, nor compromise the integrity of the article about the school. &mdash;  +++$+++ :Vandalism on Wikipedia is not ignored.  I'm sure that your teacher did not direct students to vandalize the site, nor compromise the integrity of the article about the school. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 04:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
526904 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526902 +++$+++ 526902 +++$+++ 2007-12-08 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.197151740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the info,  I wasn't done yet,  my intent was to do a few and then go back and add the inline citations.  Since were on the subject though I do have a questions about it. Actually 2 questions.  The first is when you have 2 sites with like information, like the Marine Corps whos who link and DANFS (for the sake of this we'll say the date and place of birth). Which one takes precedence or should you use both as inline citations.  My intent was to use both as citations in case 1 stops working and to help validate the information.  The 2nd is along the same lines but in this case its more specific to the Medal of Honor citation.  I can list at least 5 sites that display the Medal of Honor citation and I was wondering if it was appropriate to list them all as references and or inline citations.  Essentially ending up with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 in brackets after the citation. Thanks in advance.-- +++$+++ :Thanks for the info,  I wasn't done yet,  my intent was to do a few and then go back and add the inline citations.  Since were on the subject though I do have a questions about it. Actually 2 questions.  The first is when you have 2 sites with like information, like the Marine Corps whos who link and DANFS (for the sake of this we'll say the date and place of birth). Which one takes precedence or should you use both as inline citations.  My intent was to use both as citations in case 1 stops working and to help validate the information.  The 2nd is along the same lines but in this case its more specific to the Medal of Honor citation.  I can list at least 5 sites that display the Medal of Honor citation and I was wondering if it was appropriate to list them all as references and or inline citations.  Essentially ending up with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 in brackets after the citation. Thanks in advance.--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 14:09, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

570593 +++$+++ Master of Puppets +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-14 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.226675340E09 +++$+++ See what I mean? Cheers,  +++$+++ See what I mean? Cheers, [[User:Master of Puppets|<span style="color:#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</span>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<sub style="color:#7d7d7d">Call me MoP! :)</sub>]] 07:09, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
570594 +++$+++ Master of Puppets +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570593 +++$+++ 570593 +++$+++ 2008-11-14 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.226675400E09 +++$+++ Oh, and as for the block link, it broke the imagemap template when I used it. I'll find a way around it eventually.  +++$+++ :Oh, and as for the block link, it broke the imagemap template when I used it. I'll find a way around it eventually. [[User:Master of Puppets|<span style="color:#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</span>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<sub style="color:#7d7d7d">Call me MoP! :)</sub>]] 07:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
570595 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570593 +++$+++ 570594 +++$+++ 2008-11-14 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.226681760E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 08:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
570596 +++$+++ Master of Puppets +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570593 +++$+++ 570595 +++$+++ 2008-11-14 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.226735820E09 +++$+++ Fixed the block link. Also, starting a topic at the [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Substitution, substitution|pump]] to get widespread consensus on this quickly; maybe I'll even snag Brion in for a bit. So consider this canvassing.  +++$+++ :::Fixed the block link. Also, starting a topic at the [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Substitution, substitution|pump]] to get widespread consensus on this quickly; maybe I'll even snag Brion in for a bit. So consider this canvassing. [[User:Master of Puppets|<span style="color:#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</span>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<sub style="color:#7d7d7d">Call me MoP! :)</sub>]] 23:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
570597 +++$+++ Master of Puppets +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570593 +++$+++ 570596 +++$+++ 2008-11-25 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.227615720E09 +++$+++ No problem, I just wanted to make sure we resolve this issue. I've removed unsigned and nowrap, though the bot ''will'' substitute unsigned if it is already doing something else on the page (doing multiple things at once now). It won't be making one edit per replacement anymore, but many replacements per edit to maximize usefulness. Oh, and sorry if unblocking my bot was irregular, but I didn't see any need to block it when I wasn't going to use it until we figured this out. Anyway, I hope all is well,  +++$+++ ::::No problem, I just wanted to make sure we resolve this issue. I've removed unsigned and nowrap, though the bot ''will'' substitute unsigned if it is already doing something else on the page (doing multiple things at once now). It won't be making one edit per replacement anymore, but many replacements per edit to maximize usefulness. Oh, and sorry if unblocking my bot was irregular, but I didn't see any need to block it when I wasn't going to use it until we figured this out. Anyway, I hope all is well, [[User:Master of Puppets|<span style="color:#7d7d7d; cursor:move;">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</span>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<sub style="color:#7d7d7d; cursor:help;">Call me MoP! :D</sub>]] 04:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

15688 +++$+++ Rklawton +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-03 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.307091060E09 +++$+++ That said, I'm very interest on your take to this atypical issue. I, too, have been editing since 2002 (first under IPs), and I'm well familiar with the typical edit wars between real-world opponents, but the edits involving the Oxyhydrogen and related articles have an entirely different character, and it's not even the academic \"Theory A\" v. \"Theory B\" camps. It's science v. criminals, and there's really no compromise. These guys really are out there ripping off the public in fly-by-night operations. So - what to do?  +++$+++ That said, I'm very interest on your take to this atypical issue. I, too, have been editing since 2002 (first under IPs), and I'm well familiar with the typical edit wars between real-world opponents, but the edits involving the Oxyhydrogen and related articles have an entirely different character, and it's not even the academic "Theory A" v. "Theory B" camps. It's science v. criminals, and there's really no compromise. These guys really are out there ripping off the public in fly-by-night operations. So - what to do? [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] ([[User talk:Rklawton|talk]]) 01:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
15689 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15688 +++$+++ 15688 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.307091300E09 +++$+++ Keep in mind that there is no reliable source that the process works. Proceed accordingly. In the village I live in you can pay to have this installed by the only garage in town...  +++$+++ :Keep in mind that there is no reliable source that the process works. Proceed accordingly. In the village I live in you can pay to have this installed by the only garage in town... [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 01:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
15690 +++$+++ Rklawton +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15688 +++$+++ 15689 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.307091960E09 +++$+++ We're taking the other approach which is to say that the process doesn't produce the results claimed - and then we're besieged by editors such as [[User:Last Lost]] (above) who want sources for even these most basic and uncontroversial claims (like the only products of the electrolysis of water are H2 and O2 in a 2:1 ratio). Herein lies the problem - how are we going to find a reliable source that's going to directly refute such absurd claims as a \"thermo-nuclear\" reaction when ''their'' specific H2 O2 mixture is used? No academic journal would waste their time on refutations for each new scam, and yet that's what these editors demand. Thoughts?   +++$+++ ::We're taking the other approach which is to say that the process doesn't produce the results claimed - and then we're besieged by editors such as [[User:Last Lost]] (above) who want sources for even these most basic and uncontroversial claims (like the only products of the electrolysis of water are H2 and O2 in a 2:1 ratio). Herein lies the problem - how are we going to find a reliable source that's going to directly refute such absurd claims as a "thermo-nuclear" reaction when ''their'' specific H2 O2 mixture is used? No academic journal would waste their time on refutations for each new scam, and yet that's what these editors demand. Thoughts?  [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] ([[User talk:Rklawton|talk]]) 02:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
15691 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15688 +++$+++ 15690 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.307092140E09 +++$+++ Such claims are not taken seriously by the scientific community so no research is to be expected. Rely on the lack of reliable sources for the claims made.  +++$+++ :::Such claims are not taken seriously by the scientific community so no research is to be expected. Rely on the lack of reliable sources for the claims made. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 02:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
15692 +++$+++ Rklawton +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15688 +++$+++ 15691 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.307092620E09 +++$+++ And what of the vociferous opposition?   +++$+++ ::::And what of the vociferous opposition?  [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] ([[User talk:Rklawton|talk]]) 02:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
15693 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15688 +++$+++ 15692 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.307092740E09 +++$+++ Please be courteous, but insist on a reliable source for any fact included in Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :::::Please be courteous, but insist on a reliable source for any fact included in Wikipedia. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 02:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

375871 +++$+++ Parkwells +++$+++ AndyZ +++$+++ 375871 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-07 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.207627800E09 +++$+++ To answer objections, I changed all the links to inline citations, because I think this deserves to be a featured article. Can you review and help advance it?-- +++$+++ To answer objections, I changed all the links to inline citations, because I think this deserves to be a featured article. Can you review and help advance it?--[[User:Parkwells|Parkwells]] ([[User talk:Parkwells|talk]]) 21:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
375872 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ AndyZ +++$+++ 375871 +++$+++ 375871 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.207629300E09 +++$+++ Andy is not very active right now - why not submit this to [[WP:PR|Peer Review]] for some feedback? I will comment on it if you submit it there,  +++$+++ *Andy is not very active right now - why not submit this to [[WP:PR|Peer Review]] for some feedback? I will comment on it if you submit it there, [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]]  '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 21:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

395831 +++$+++ Habj +++$+++ Lexor +++$+++ 395831 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-02 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.138876140E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Gene-duplication.png]] is a high quality drawing, and I would like to transfer it to commons. The link to the source is dead, however - it seems they moved the image. Do you possibly remember where on the site you found it? I have tried to find it on the web site, but I have not succeeded. Of course they could have removed it altogether, in which case I guess I'll transfer it to Commons with the available info. \/\/  +++$+++ [[:Image:Gene-duplication.png]] is a high quality drawing, and I would like to transfer it to commons. The link to the source is dead, however - it seems they moved the image. Do you possibly remember where on the site you found it? I have tried to find it on the web site, but I have not succeeded. Of course they could have removed it altogether, in which case I guess I'll transfer it to Commons with the available info. // [[User:Habj|Habj]] 02:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
395832 +++$+++ Habj +++$+++ Lexor +++$+++ 395831 +++$+++ 395831 +++$+++ 2006-02-02 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.138876620E09 +++$+++ I was too quick, sorry! It must have been here, right? [http:\/\/www.genome.gov\/10002096#g] It seems they removed the entry. \/\/  +++$+++ : I was too quick, sorry! It must have been here, right? [http://www.genome.gov/10002096#g] It seems they removed the entry. // [[User:Habj|Habj]] 02:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

539981 +++$+++ Antidiskriminator +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539981 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-21 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.295652180E09 +++$+++ Can you help and propose how to improve the first sentence not to mislead the readers about formal administrative division of the Ottoman Empire?-- +++$+++ Can you help and propose how to improve the first sentence not to mislead the readers about formal administrative division of the Ottoman Empire?--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 15:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
539982 +++$+++ Antidiskriminator +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539981 +++$+++ 539981 +++$+++ 2011-01-21 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.295654580E09 +++$+++ I did not want to open that box because I estimated that there is \"made by Pandora\" inscription on it. Therefore I deliberately avoided to insist on any POV in order to keep the article NPOV (I am sure that you know that sometimes you have to be Tom Cruz in mission impossible to do it in topics like this). I propose you to follow my logic and to avoid taking any POV but to simply try to include words claim or promise into first sentence without really suggesting anything about de jure or de facto existence. For now.-- +++$+++ : I did not want to open that box because I estimated that there is "made by Pandora" inscription on it. Therefore I deliberately avoided to insist on any POV in order to keep the article NPOV (I am sure that you know that sometimes you have to be Tom Cruz in mission impossible to do it in topics like this). I propose you to follow my logic and to avoid taking any POV but to simply try to include words claim or promise into first sentence without really suggesting anything about de jure or de facto existence. For now.--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 16:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

15694 +++$+++ Last Lost +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15694 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-03 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.307146920E09 +++$+++ By the way, Fred, your advice \"insist on a reliable source for any fact\" goes contrary to the approach preached by Rklawton: it was exactly him (and two other page owners) who belligerently refused to add a reference I asked for (and added by another user). It was truly Kafkaesque experience: I asked for references from reliable sources, and I was variously called troll, sockpuppet, Smarty Pants, someone making them to \"jump through the hoops\", and so on. I truly hope that not all wikipedians who claim to edit since 2002 have this attitude. And this is really weird: the very same Rklawton writes above about litigous nature of these fringe scientists. Logically thinking, in such circumstances wikipedia really has to \"jump through the hoops\" and back any accusations in fringe science by reliable third party references.   +++$+++ By the way, Fred, your advice "insist on a reliable source for any fact" goes contrary to the approach preached by Rklawton: it was exactly him (and two other page owners) who belligerently refused to add a reference I asked for (and added by another user). It was truly Kafkaesque experience: I asked for references from reliable sources, and I was variously called troll, sockpuppet, Smarty Pants, someone making them to "jump through the hoops", and so on. I truly hope that not all wikipedians who claim to edit since 2002 have this attitude. And this is really weird: the very same Rklawton writes above about litigous nature of these fringe scientists. Logically thinking, in such circumstances wikipedia really has to "jump through the hoops" and back any accusations in fringe science by reliable third party references.  [[User:Last Lost|Last Lost]] ([[User talk:Last Lost|talk]]) 17:22, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
15695 +++$+++ Rklawton +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15694 +++$+++ 15694 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.307170140E09 +++$+++ The reference in question was in place ''before'' the request for references. I simply pointed it out.  +++$+++ :The reference in question was in place ''before'' the request for references. I simply pointed it out. [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] ([[User talk:Rklawton|talk]]) 23:49, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
15696 +++$+++ Rklawton +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15694 +++$+++ 15695 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.307170320E09 +++$+++ I stand corrected regarding the timing of the source edit. The fact that it was easily obtained does help indicate that the assertions made in the article were high-school science level and really didn't require sourcing - all of which makes me doubt Last Lost's motives and the nature of his account.   +++$+++ :* I stand corrected regarding the timing of the source edit. The fact that it was easily obtained does help indicate that the assertions made in the article were high-school science level and really didn't require sourcing - all of which makes me doubt Last Lost's motives and the nature of his account.  [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] ([[User talk:Rklawton|talk]]) 23:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
15697 +++$+++ Last Lost +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15694 +++$+++ 15696 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.307365260E09 +++$+++ Sorry Fred for using your page as a chat board, this is my last post here. I am at a loss how to deal with aggressive editors in topics with low eyeball count, so I better avoid them.   +++$+++ :**Sorry Fred for using your page as a chat board, this is my last post here. I am at a loss how to deal with aggressive editors in topics with low eyeball count, so I better avoid them.  [[User:Last Lost|Last Lost]] ([[User talk:Last Lost|talk]]) 06:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

550452 +++$+++ Hajor +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-20 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.121913840E09 +++$+++ Aren't they the new monsters on [[Doctor Who]]? Cheers,  +++$+++ Aren't they the new monsters on [[Doctor Who]]? Cheers, [[User:Hajor|&ndash;''Hajor'']] 19:44, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
550453 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550452 +++$+++ 550452 +++$+++ 2005-07-20 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.121914680E09 +++$+++ LOL! I wonder if they've seen any Tardi out there lately... - +++$+++ :LOL! I wonder if they've seen any Tardi out there lately... -[[User:Splash|Splash]] 19:58, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

277842 +++$+++ Tarc +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277842 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-15 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.255646400E09 +++$+++ ''I'' was the one being called the racist, not the other way around. :)  +++$+++ ''I'' was the one being called the racist, not the other way around. :) [[User:Tarc|Tarc]] ([[User talk:Tarc|talk]]) 15:40, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
277843 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277842 +++$+++ 277842 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.255663260E09 +++$+++ Oops, my apologies.  I guess I didn't read the whole \"racist allegations\" and multiracial string closely enough.   +++$+++ :Oops, my apologies.  I guess I didn't read the whole "racist allegations" and multiracial string closely enough.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 20:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
277844 +++$+++ Tarc +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277842 +++$+++ 277843 +++$+++ 2009-10-15 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.255663800E09 +++$+++ It's all good, thread's closed-up now, though a drive-by IP reverted it for a few for some reason.  JohnH lurking perhaps?  +++$+++ ::It's all good, thread's closed-up now, though a drive-by IP reverted it for a few for some reason.  JohnH lurking perhaps? [[User:Tarc|Tarc]] ([[User talk:Tarc|talk]]) 20:30, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

15700 +++$+++ Nat Krause +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15700 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-01 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.309578300E09 +++$+++ A while back, I posted a new proposal for [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Tibetan)|Tibetan naming conventions]], i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on [[Talk:Qamdo]] and [[Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture]]. I hope that discussions on the proposal's [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Tibetan)|talk page]] will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Tibetan)|naming conventions]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Tibetan)|giving your opinion]], I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks&mdash; +++$+++ A while back, I posted a new proposal for [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Tibetan)|Tibetan naming conventions]], i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on [[Talk:Qamdo]] and [[Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture]]. I hope that discussions on the proposal's [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Tibetan)|talk page]] will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Tibetan)|naming conventions]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Tibetan)|giving your opinion]], I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks&mdash;[[User:Nat Krause|Nat Krause]]<sup>([[User talk:Nat Krause|Talk!]]·[[Special:Contributions/Nat Krause|What have I done?]])</sup> 20:45, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
15701 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ 15700 +++$+++ 15700 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.312360620E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but I don't understand this or what you want.  +++$+++ :I'm sorry, but I don't understand this or what you want. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 01:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

277845 +++$+++ A8UDI +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-19 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.255990980E09 +++$+++ <font color=\"darkblue\">'''A8UDI'''<\/font>  +++$+++ <font color="darkblue">'''A8UDI'''</font> [[User talk:A8UDI|<font color="black">'''talk'''</font>]] 15:23, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
277846 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277845 +++$+++ 277845 +++$+++ 2009-10-19 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.255999620E09 +++$+++ You should be aware that I have reported ''your'' behavior to the 3RR noticeboard [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Edit warring#User:203.171.199.156 reported by User:QueenofBattle (Result: )|here]].  +++$+++ :You should be aware that I have reported ''your'' behavior to the 3RR noticeboard [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:203.171.199.156 reported by User:QueenofBattle (Result: )|here]]. [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 17:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
277847 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277845 +++$+++ 277845 +++$+++ 2009-10-19 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.256001120E09 +++$+++ Well, I guess we'll just wait and see what happens...   +++$+++ :Well, I guess we'll just wait and see what happens...  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 18:12, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
277848 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277845 +++$+++ 277847 +++$+++ 2009-10-19 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.256004300E09 +++$+++ As an update, user [[Special:Contributions\/203.171.199.156|203.171.199.156]] has been [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:203.171.199.156&diff=prev&oldid=320846720 blocked] from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]] and [[WP:FORUM|using a talk page as a forum]]. Also, as an example of a classic [[WP:TE|refusal to get the point]], the user also had ''two other'' IP addresses blocked for one month ''each'' for first [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3A203.171.196.230&action=historysubmit&diff=321006384&oldid=321001489 attempting to evade the original block], and then secondly [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3A203.171.199.85&action=historysubmit&diff=321389793&oldid=321383013 attempting to evade the second block].  The entire time, the user has [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:QueenofBattle&diff=prev&oldid=320980960 denied being blocked], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:QueenofBattle&diff=prev&oldid=321355458 accused me of lying about the blocks], and found several other ways to be disruptive.  Go figure; a liar accusing someone else of lying.   +++$+++ ::As an update, user [[Special:Contributions/203.171.199.156|203.171.199.156]] has been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:203.171.199.156&diff=prev&oldid=320846720 blocked] from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]] and [[WP:FORUM|using a talk page as a forum]]. Also, as an example of a classic [[WP:TE|refusal to get the point]], the user also had ''two other'' IP addresses blocked for one month ''each'' for first [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A203.171.196.230&action=historysubmit&diff=321006384&oldid=321001489 attempting to evade the original block], and then secondly [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A203.171.199.85&action=historysubmit&diff=321389793&oldid=321383013 attempting to evade the second block].  The entire time, the user has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:QueenofBattle&diff=prev&oldid=320980960 denied being blocked], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:QueenofBattle&diff=prev&oldid=321355458 accused me of lying about the blocks], and found several other ways to be disruptive.  Go figure; a liar accusing someone else of lying.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 19:05, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

539990 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539990 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-25 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.295964180E09 +++$+++ }}  \u2014 +++$+++ }}  —[[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  06:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
539991 +++$+++ WhiteWriter  +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539990 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.296086760E09 +++$+++ Ohoho!! Congrats!! This is very nice! :) :) :) --<span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ ::Ohoho!! Congrats!! This is very nice! :) :) :) --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter |WhiteWriter ]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 16:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

539992 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.296196560E09 +++$+++ [[Church of Christ Pantocrator, Nesebar]] \u2013 another good piece of work.  Rather more colourful than all the churches I'm writing about at the moment, but that might be because the weather's better in Bulgaria!  +++$+++ [[Church of Christ Pantocrator, Nesebar]] – another good piece of work.  Rather more colourful than all the churches I'm writing about at the moment, but that might be because the weather's better in Bulgaria! [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 22:36, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
539993 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539992 +++$+++ 539992 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 08:45:00 +++$+++ 1.296233100E09 +++$+++ In contrast, the average church I write about looks like [[:File:Bodwrog Church - geograph.org.uk - 152480.jpg|this]]... no coloured brickwork here!  +++$+++ :In contrast, the average church I write about looks like [[:File:Bodwrog Church - geograph.org.uk - 152480.jpg|this]]... no coloured brickwork here! [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 08:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

277850 +++$+++ Nicola Romani +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277850 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-25 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.256479800E09 +++$+++ Ok! ;) -- +++$+++ Ok! ;) --[[User:Nicola Romani|Nicola Romani]] ([[User talk:Nicola Romani|talk]]) 07:10, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
277851 +++$+++ Nicola Romani +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277850 +++$+++ 277850 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.256779200E09 +++$+++ Hi QueenofBattle, can you help me please with this page [[Uniforms of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary\u200e]]? I've uploaded all the pics showing the various uniform tipes... but now need some description and my English is very bad! :( Thank you in advance. -- +++$+++ :Hi QueenofBattle, can you help me please with this page [[Uniforms of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary‎]]? I've uploaded all the pics showing the various uniform tipes... but now need some description and my English is very bad! :( Thank you in advance. --[[User:Nicola Romani|Nicola Romani]] ([[User talk:Nicola Romani|talk]]) 18:20, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
277852 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277850 +++$+++ 277851 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.256779920E09 +++$+++ I will; I'd be happy to help.  I'll work on it over the next few days.   +++$+++ :: I will; I'd be happy to help.  I'll work on it over the next few days.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 18:32, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
277853 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277850 +++$+++ 277850 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.257985260E09 +++$+++ I will put a template on your talk page welcoming you to Wikipedia with links to several other helpful tools.  I will also watch the page in question and intercede where I see editors running afoul of how we try to do things here.  Again, welcome.   +++$+++ :I will put a template on your talk page welcoming you to Wikipedia with links to several other helpful tools.  I will also watch the page in question and intercede where I see editors running afoul of how we try to do things here.  Again, welcome.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 16:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
277854 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277850 +++$+++ 277850 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.257990240E09 +++$+++ I'll keep an eye on it.   +++$+++ :I'll keep an eye on it.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 17:44, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

15708 +++$+++ Deiz +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-24 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.148535120E09 +++$+++ Restored to last good edit. Glad to be of service. <b> +++$+++ Restored to last good edit. Glad to be of service. <b>[[User:Deiz|<FONT STYLE="verdana" COLOR="#000000">Dei</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF3300">zio</FONT>]]</b> <small>[[User talk:Deiz|talk]]</small> 22:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
15709 +++$+++ Tangotango +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15708 +++$+++ 15708 +++$+++ 2006-06-23 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.151077320E09 +++$+++ Hello, it's good that you have taken the issue to the talk page of the article. If the problem continues, please try one of the methods listed at [[Wikipedia:Resolving disputes]]. It may be good to introduce a third party to the dispute, as listed on the page. Cheers, [[User:Tangotango|Tangot]] +++$+++ :Hello, it's good that you have taken the issue to the talk page of the article. If the problem continues, please try one of the methods listed at [[Wikipedia:Resolving disputes]]. It may be good to introduce a third party to the dispute, as listed on the page. Cheers, [[User:Tangotango|Tangot]][[User:Tangotango/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User Talk:Tangotango|ngo]] 08:42, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

539997 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-21 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.285120620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for vetting again! I would leave Victuallers' suggestion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=385989386]: it seems like I did a lot of DYKs recently and annoyed everybody with Albania, Albania: let's have the people look at the DYK without any clue where this Shirgj Monastery is and they'll find out, :-). --<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ Thanks for vetting again! I would leave Victuallers' suggestion [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=385989386]: it seems like I did a lot of DYKs recently and annoyed everybody with Albania, Albania: let's have the people look at the DYK without any clue where this Shirgj Monastery is and they'll find out, :-). --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 18:57, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
539998 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539997 +++$+++ 539997 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.285132080E09 +++$+++ Well, that's entirely up to you, of course, and your argument does make sense. Though, on the other hand, I've been spamming DYK with \"Bulgaria, Bulgaria\" for quite a lot of time now and it never occurred to me to stop :) Balkan articles remain rare and there's still American and English domination and DYK, so let's keep annoying everyone! :) <span style=\"text-align: center; clear: both; font-family:Georgia, serif; font-size: 10pt; font-variant: small-caps; font-style: normal;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ : Well, that's entirely up to you, of course, and your argument does make sense. Though, on the other hand, I've been spamming DYK with "Bulgaria, Bulgaria" for quite a lot of time now and it never occurred to me to stop :) Balkan articles remain rare and there's still American and English domination and DYK, so let's keep annoying everyone! :) <span style="text-align: center; clear: both; font-family:Georgia, serif; font-size: 10pt; font-variant: small-caps; font-style: normal;"> — [[User:TodorBozhinov|Toдor]] [[User talk:TodorBozhinov|Boжinov]] —</span> 22:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
539999 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539997 +++$+++ 539998 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.285192920E09 +++$+++ Okey doke, then done deal [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ADid_you_know&action=historysubmit&diff=386328778&oldid=386328628].--<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ ::Okey doke, then done deal [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ADid_you_know&action=historysubmit&diff=386328778&oldid=386328628].--<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 15:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

15711 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15711 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-18 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.155957420E09 +++$+++ I notice that you were the admin who protected [[Apollo moon landing hoax]]; could you perhaps do the same for [[What happened on the Moon]]?  I suppose we could try just warning or blocking the IP address that is doing it, but I suspect the page will end up with the same sort of problems as the main hoax page. -- +++$+++ I notice that you were the admin who protected [[Apollo moon landing hoax]]; could you perhaps do the same for [[What happened on the Moon]]?  I suppose we could try just warning or blocking the IP address that is doing it, but I suspect the page will end up with the same sort of problems as the main hoax page. --[[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] 20:17, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
15712 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15711 +++$+++ 15711 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.155957840E09 +++$+++ I don't think it's worth protecting that page yet, just because of one disagreement with only 2 reverts per party.  Make sure that you do not end up violating [[WP:3RR]] though, even if you are doing the correct thing.  If more happens, you can write to me again, or if I'm not around leave a request at [[WP:RFPP]].  Try to discuss things on the talk page first, though. \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ :I don't think it's worth protecting that page yet, just because of one disagreement with only 2 reverts per party.  Make sure that you do not end up violating [[WP:3RR]] though, even if you are doing the correct thing.  If more happens, you can write to me again, or if I'm not around leave a request at [[WP:RFPP]].  Try to discuss things on the talk page first, though. —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 20:24, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

277856 +++$+++ 22015va +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277856 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-12 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.258028940E09 +++$+++ Just saw your message about the rollback tool.  I will stand aside.  I'm too new Wikipedia to compete here. +++$+++ Just saw your message about the rollback tool.  I will stand aside.  I'm too new Wikipedia to compete here.[[User:22015va|22015va]] ([[User talk:22015va|talk]]) 04:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
277857 +++$+++ Todd Gallagher +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277856 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.258029960E09 +++$+++ I am going to take a break. You go through and see what citations are legit. I will be back later. I have been around Wikipedia long enough not to screw with sites. I have started several and edit several. If you want to mediate this site with the SGAUS, go for it. Our constant edit war is not going to help. As I said, review the citations two editors, one anonymous and one with a username, are trying to block. All info I have posted is LITERALLY from the SGAUS.org website or from an SGAUS chapter website. No original research at all. +++$+++ ::I am going to take a break. You go through and see what citations are legit. I will be back later. I have been around Wikipedia long enough not to screw with sites. I have started several and edit several. If you want to mediate this site with the SGAUS, go for it. Our constant edit war is not going to help. As I said, review the citations two editors, one anonymous and one with a username, are trying to block. All info I have posted is LITERALLY from the SGAUS.org website or from an SGAUS chapter website. No original research at all.[[User:Todd Gallagher|Todd Gallagher]] ([[User talk:Todd Gallagher|talk]]) 04:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
277858 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277856 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.258030260E09 +++$+++ Good.  That's all I wanted in the first place.  Some edits are valid, but in the process you keep deleting or reverting other stuff that was just plain wrong, grammatically or otherwise, which is vandalism.  I'll look through it and try to fairly sort through the sources.  I have no dog in this hunt, per se; I have a federal commission.   +++$+++ :::Good.  That's all I wanted in the first place.  Some edits are valid, but in the process you keep deleting or reverting other stuff that was just plain wrong, grammatically or otherwise, which is vandalism.  I'll look through it and try to fairly sort through the sources.  I have no dog in this hunt, per se; I have a federal commission.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 04:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

15713 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-18 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.155967380E09 +++$+++ OK, I've reverted this time and asked the anon to use the talk page. \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ OK, I've reverted this time and asked the anon to use the talk page. —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 23:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
15714 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15713 +++$+++ 15713 +++$+++ 2006-08-19 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.156041600E09 +++$+++ I've reverted it agian. \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ :I've reverted it agian. —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 19:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

15715 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15715 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-24 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.156404540E09 +++$+++ Could you perhaps do the latest revert on this article?  And, what do you think should be the next step?  I admit that the last time I asked might have been a bit early to take action, but, if you look at the talk page, things have deteriorated a bit.  +++$+++ Could you perhaps do the latest revert on this article?  And, what do you think should be the next step?  I admit that the last time I asked might have been a bit early to take action, but, if you look at the talk page, things have deteriorated a bit. [[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] 00:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
15716 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15715 +++$+++ 15715 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.156409460E09 +++$+++ Oh god, I don't know what to do about that article.  I've reverted him again, on the article and talk page (where he told you to \"go eff yourself\").  The user seems unwilling to co-operate.  I still have no idea why he is calling factual information \"government propoganda\" either.  The paragraph does not say \"this movie is WRONG\", it just presents the results of a poll showing most people regard the moon landing as fact. \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ :Oh god, I don't know what to do about that article.  I've reverted him again, on the article and talk page (where he told you to "go eff yourself").  The user seems unwilling to co-operate.  I still have no idea why he is calling factual information "government propoganda" either.  The paragraph does not say "this movie is WRONG", it just presents the results of a poll showing most people regard the moon landing as fact. —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 01:51, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

15717 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15717 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-24 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.156436100E09 +++$+++ No worries. I just reverted him on his userpage and gave him another NPA warning. If he makes anymore personal attacks, he should be listed on [[WP:PAIN]] since he's had at least two warnings for personal attacks now. Cheers,  +++$+++ No worries. I just reverted him on his userpage and gave him another NPA warning. If he makes anymore personal attacks, he should be listed on [[WP:PAIN]] since he's had at least two warnings for personal attacks now. Cheers, [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 09:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
15718 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15717 +++$+++ 15717 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.156437000E09 +++$+++ I made a report at [[WP:PAIN]]. Feel free to add to it if you wish.  +++$+++ :I made a report at [[WP:PAIN]]. Feel free to add to it if you wish. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 09:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

15719 +++$+++ Kmaguir1 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-30 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.156947960E09 +++$+++ This is a request for immediate help from [[User:Kmaguir1|Kmaguir1]] 07:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC). If you have time, I'd like you to examine the [[Bell Hooks]] article and talk page. It's a scholarly article about a controversial writer, someone who drew the ire of a conservative commentator. They wanted me to go get the quote from her book, and I did that. But now, they're arguing it's not notable. As a fellow AfD frequenter, you will know that of all the meaningless academic trivia included on her page, that what they wanted to exclude was really ridiculous: that she says as an opening to her book, ''Killing Rage'', \"I am writing this essay sitting beside an anonymous white male that I long to murder\". This may in itself be notable, but David Horowitz wrote about it in 100 Dangerous Professors, and it was written about on front page mag, and all the citations are given on the page. I would appreciate your help--I'm contending with some very difficult Marxists who are attached to her work, and think that they're defending the liberal cause, but really, they're just keeping out material that is very easily notable.- +++$+++ This is a request for immediate help from [[User:Kmaguir1|Kmaguir1]] 07:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC). If you have time, I'd like you to examine the [[Bell Hooks]] article and talk page. It's a scholarly article about a controversial writer, someone who drew the ire of a conservative commentator. They wanted me to go get the quote from her book, and I did that. But now, they're arguing it's not notable. As a fellow AfD frequenter, you will know that of all the meaningless academic trivia included on her page, that what they wanted to exclude was really ridiculous: that she says as an opening to her book, ''Killing Rage'', "I am writing this essay sitting beside an anonymous white male that I long to murder". This may in itself be notable, but David Horowitz wrote about it in 100 Dangerous Professors, and it was written about on front page mag, and all the citations are given on the page. I would appreciate your help--I'm contending with some very difficult Marxists who are attached to her work, and think that they're defending the liberal cause, but really, they're just keeping out material that is very easily notable.-[[User:Kmaguir1|Kmaguir1]] 07:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
15720 +++$+++ Anthony Krupp +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15719 +++$+++ 15719 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.156983960E09 +++$+++ Bottom line: welcome to [[bell hooks]], be aware of the RfC, and feel free to join it. Cheers,-- +++$+++ :Bottom line: welcome to [[bell hooks]], be aware of the RfC, and feel free to join it. Cheers,--[[User:Anthony Krupp|Anthony Krupp]] 17:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

15721 +++$+++ Therealmikelvee +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15721 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-01 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.157112120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Therealmikelvee|mikey]] 05:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
15722 +++$+++ Therealmikelvee +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15721 +++$+++ 15721 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.157147460E09 +++$+++ Again, I could find you a source for the Ellen Church thing as well.   +++$+++ :Again, I could find you a source for the Ellen Church thing as well.  [[User:Therealmikelvee|mikey]] 14:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
15723 +++$+++ Therealmikelvee +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15721 +++$+++ 15722 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.157163180E09 +++$+++ No, don't worry about it, I don't really support it, not that I'm against it.   +++$+++ ::No, don't worry about it, I don't really support it, not that I'm against it.  [[User:Therealmikelvee|mikey]] 19:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

277866 +++$+++ 22015va +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-18 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.258544280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:22015va|22015va]] ([[User talk:22015va|talk]]) 03:38, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
277867 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277866 +++$+++ 277866 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.258941300E09 +++$+++ It looks like the two of you have a content dispute, which crafty editing by third-party editors can only help so much.  Most of my edits have been further edited or reverted by one of the two of you to further your individual points of view.  I think you both need to work out your differences first, before I can help.   +++$+++ :It looks like the two of you have a content dispute, which crafty editing by third-party editors can only help so much.  Most of my edits have been further edited or reverted by one of the two of you to further your individual points of view.  I think you both need to work out your differences first, before I can help.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 17:55, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

570599 +++$+++ Happy-melon +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-20 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.227232920E09 +++$+++ Title says it all <tt>:D<\/tt>. I expect you'll want to get involved. <font color=\"forestgreen\"> +++$+++ Title says it all <tt>:D</tt>. I expect you'll want to get involved. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 18:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
570600 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570599 +++$+++ 570599 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.227446940E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 05:29, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

15724 +++$+++ Taikara +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-03 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.157341380E09 +++$+++ I think I should apologize for my comment in response to your pointing out my lack of prolificness in editing. I've been pouring over WP policies for what seems like forever now (though it's more like a few weeks), and I've just run across the \"meatpuppet\" issue, and against the posted advisory not to take it personally in [[WP:GD]], I believe I did. So, I apologize for my newbie-ness, but please be aware that I do care greatly about WP policies as much as I care about freeware and the AR article, and am not just a \"meatpuppet\" sent to participate in an AfD. To be honest, I am just not naturally \"bold\" about editing other people's work, it feels a bit strange, but I know a bit about this subject, and am attempting to learn the ropes of the processes here.  +++$+++ I think I should apologize for my comment in response to your pointing out my lack of prolificness in editing. I've been pouring over WP policies for what seems like forever now (though it's more like a few weeks), and I've just run across the "meatpuppet" issue, and against the posted advisory not to take it personally in [[WP:GD]], I believe I did. So, I apologize for my newbie-ness, but please be aware that I do care greatly about WP policies as much as I care about freeware and the AR article, and am not just a "meatpuppet" sent to participate in an AfD. To be honest, I am just not naturally "bold" about editing other people's work, it feels a bit strange, but I know a bit about this subject, and am attempting to learn the ropes of the processes here. [[User:Taikara|Taikara]] 20:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
15725 +++$+++ Taikara +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15724 +++$+++ 15724 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.157364120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the response. I've added a slight bit of info to my user page and tricked out my sig a bit, so maybe I won't appear quite so newbie in future discussions. You know, I don't really have much to contribute outside of freeware, but maybe I could help out in the AfD volunteering, it has been kind of fun researching policies. Regards ^^ <span style=\"font-weight: bold; padding: 2px; background-color: white; color: purple; border: 1px solid purple\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for the response. I've added a slight bit of info to my user page and tricked out my sig a bit, so maybe I won't appear quite so newbie in future discussions. You know, I don't really have much to contribute outside of freeware, but maybe I could help out in the AfD volunteering, it has been kind of fun researching policies. Regards ^^ <span style="font-weight: bold; padding: 2px; background-color: white; color: purple; border: 1px solid purple">[[User:Taikara|Taikara]] | [[User talk:Taikara|Talk]]</span> 03:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
15726 +++$+++ Taikara +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15724 +++$+++ 15725 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.157536260E09 +++$+++ Hello again, and sorry about this, I'm hoping for some advice. At this point, I'm resigned to the possibility that the AR article will be deleted (I sort of figured it was likely after it was nominated, but that wasn't going to keep me from trying to prevent it :P) - however, there's a user who's had some... let's just say bad history... with the AR community that's rather effectively mucking up the discussion. I've tried to get the discussion back on track, but there's a lot of attacking\/ranting going on, and I'm unsure how to proceed, and starting to lose my temper. Obviously, he's welcome to his opinion, but the way he's expressing it is rather inflammatory, imho. I've considered an admin alert, but I have no idea if that is acceptable, or worth bothering with for this situation. Could you please advise? Also, I've floundered around a bit with a good way to get started helping out beyond the AR article, and there's just so much, it's a bit overwhelming, which is why I never got involved before :( -- <span style=\"font-weight: bold; padding: 2px; background-color: white; color: purple; border: 1px solid purple\"> +++$+++ ::Hello again, and sorry about this, I'm hoping for some advice. At this point, I'm resigned to the possibility that the AR article will be deleted (I sort of figured it was likely after it was nominated, but that wasn't going to keep me from trying to prevent it :P) - however, there's a user who's had some... let's just say bad history... with the AR community that's rather effectively mucking up the discussion. I've tried to get the discussion back on track, but there's a lot of attacking/ranting going on, and I'm unsure how to proceed, and starting to lose my temper. Obviously, he's welcome to his opinion, but the way he's expressing it is rather inflammatory, imho. I've considered an admin alert, but I have no idea if that is acceptable, or worth bothering with for this situation. Could you please advise? Also, I've floundered around a bit with a good way to get started helping out beyond the AR article, and there's just so much, it's a bit overwhelming, which is why I never got involved before :( -- <span style="font-weight: bold; padding: 2px; background-color: white; color: purple; border: 1px solid purple">[[User:Taikara|Taikara]] | [[User talk:Taikara|Talk]]</span> 02:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
15727 +++$+++ Taikara +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15724 +++$+++ 15726 +++$+++ 2006-09-06 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.157539200E09 +++$+++ Thanks again, you've been really helpful, and I appreciate it. I think I'll just stop responding to him full stop, as I've already tried the \"we agree to disagree, please stop\" tactic. Unfortunately, I've experienced this before, and I should know from that experience that saying so much as \"hello\" is inviting a tirade. I think I was just caught a bit off guard by him here on WP. I think I'll try to check out things I'm familiar with as I think of them, that was an excellent suggestion! <span style=\"font-weight: bold; padding: 2px; background-color: white; color: purple; border: 1px solid purple\"> +++$+++ :::Thanks again, you've been really helpful, and I appreciate it. I think I'll just stop responding to him full stop, as I've already tried the "we agree to disagree, please stop" tactic. Unfortunately, I've experienced this before, and I should know from that experience that saying so much as "hello" is inviting a tirade. I think I was just caught a bit off guard by him here on WP. I think I'll try to check out things I'm familiar with as I think of them, that was an excellent suggestion! <span style="font-weight: bold; padding: 2px; background-color: white; color: purple; border: 1px solid purple">[[User:Taikara|Taikara]] | [[User talk:Taikara|Talk]]</span> 03:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

277870 +++$+++ New Hampshirite +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277870 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-21 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.258852500E09 +++$+++ I removed Popeye from the list of Notable Coast Guardsmen,  again. I agree that Popeye should never be left out but he was the only fictional character on the list and he's already mentioned immediately below under Popular Culture.  +++$+++ I removed Popeye from the list of Notable Coast Guardsmen,  again. I agree that Popeye should never be left out but he was the only fictional character on the list and he's already mentioned immediately below under Popular Culture. [[User:New Hampshirite|New Hampshirite]] ([[User talk:New Hampshirite|talk]]) 17:15, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
277871 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277870 +++$+++ 277870 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.258886340E09 +++$+++ OK, got it.  Thanks.   +++$+++ :OK, got it.  Thanks.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 02:39, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

277872 +++$+++ Misortie +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277872 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-21 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.258870920E09 +++$+++ You must of forgot to sign your latest comment on [[Talk:Barack Obama]] but Signbot decided it wasn\u2019t going to fix that for you.  Bah, it isn\u2019t perfect, no one is, bot or human.-- +++$+++ You must of forgot to sign your latest comment on [[Talk:Barack Obama]] but Signbot decided it wasn’t going to fix that for you.  Bah, it isn’t perfect, no one is, bot or human.--[[User:Misortie|Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^]] ([[User talk:Misortie|talk]]) 22:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
277873 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277872 +++$+++ 277872 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.258886280E09 +++$+++ Hmm, weird.  Thanks, I went back and signed the comment.   +++$+++ :Hmm, weird.  Thanks, I went back and signed the comment.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 02:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

540017 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-11 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.286855520E09 +++$+++ I would really appreciate the Bulgarian view on Faveyrial. A DYK maybe? --<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ I would really appreciate the Bulgarian view on Faveyrial. A DYK maybe? --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 20:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
540018 +++$+++ sulmues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540017 +++$+++ 540017 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.286939880E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your help there. Now I know it'll take awhile, because the conflict of interest won't let you review. Could Zjarri or another Albanian editor review these articles, in general? --<span style=\"font-family: Gothic;\"> +++$+++ :Thank you for your help there. Now I know it'll take awhile, because the conflict of interest won't let you review. Could Zjarri or another Albanian editor review these articles, in general? --<span style="font-family: Gothic;">[[User:Sulmues|'''<big>S</big>'''ulmues]] <sup>([[User talk:Sulmues|talk]])</sup></span> 20:18, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

277874 +++$+++ DD2K +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277874 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-24 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.259056740E09 +++$+++ While President Obama's approval rating dropping below 50% may be noteworthy(and it is), the number cited was incorrect(none of the links provided gave 48% as the number). Also, all of the poll numbers probably belong in the [[Presidency of Barack Obama]], and\/or the [[President_obama_approval|Obama approval]] articles. As do many of the new entries being added in the [[Barack Obama]] article. At least that's what I believe. Also, I meant no offense with my comment on the [[Talk:Barack Obama|Obama Talk page]], so sorry if it came across the wrong way.  +++$+++ While President Obama's approval rating dropping below 50% may be noteworthy(and it is), the number cited was incorrect(none of the links provided gave 48% as the number). Also, all of the poll numbers probably belong in the [[Presidency of Barack Obama]], and/or the [[President_obama_approval|Obama approval]] articles. As do many of the new entries being added in the [[Barack Obama]] article. At least that's what I believe. Also, I meant no offense with my comment on the [[Talk:Barack Obama|Obama Talk page]], so sorry if it came across the wrong way. [[User:DD2K|DD2K]] ([[User talk:DD2K|talk]]) 01:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
277875 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277874 +++$+++ 277874 +++$+++ 2009-11-24 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.259057040E09 +++$+++ First, no worries about the talk page comments; I took no offense.  Secondly, while I am apt to agree with you, dropping below 50% the first time is significant for any president (I corrected it to 49%), and I think has a place in the BLP as well as in the other articles you cite.   +++$+++ :First, no worries about the talk page comments; I took no offense.  Secondly, while I am apt to agree with you, dropping below 50% the first time is significant for any president (I corrected it to 49%), and I think has a place in the BLP as well as in the other articles you cite.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 02:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
277876 +++$+++ DD2K +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277874 +++$+++ 277875 +++$+++ 2009-11-24 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.259057580E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks for the quick response. I suppose if we are going to have the high polling numbers there, it definitely should be mentioned that his number dropped below 50%. My concern was if\/when it climbs back up over 50%, and then drops again, and climbs again, that we have too many entries about the polling. In any case, you're right. We can deal with that if\/when it happens. Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::Ok, thanks for the quick response. I suppose if we are going to have the high polling numbers there, it definitely should be mentioned that his number dropped below 50%. My concern was if/when it climbs back up over 50%, and then drops again, and climbs again, that we have too many entries about the polling. In any case, you're right. We can deal with that if/when it happens. Thanks again. [[User:DD2K|DD2K]] ([[User talk:DD2K|talk]]) 02:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

540019 +++$+++ WhiteWriter  +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540019 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-12 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.286917380E09 +++$+++ All best! --<span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ All best! --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter |WhiteWriter ]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 14:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
540020 +++$+++ WhiteWriter  +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540019 +++$+++ 540019 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.286946960E09 +++$+++ Ahahaha, there was some flaws! :) But they were minor. I removed intro, only remained \"significant contributor to [[Serbian culture]]\", and that is obvious, and for the years, well, bitef main site have who is who, so... It can be tracked for the past three years. And other sources can be easily found. Well, now i will talk to you exclusively when i nominate something for DYK. I must create one flawless nomination. Just to let you know! :) --<span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ :Ahahaha, there was some flaws! :) But they were minor. I removed intro, only remained "significant contributor to [[Serbian culture]]", and that is obvious, and for the years, well, bitef main site have who is who, so... It can be tracked for the past three years. And other sources can be easily found. Well, now i will talk to you exclusively when i nominate something for DYK. I must create one flawless nomination. Just to let you know! :) --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter |WhiteWriter ]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 22:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
540021 +++$+++ WhiteWriter  +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540019 +++$+++ 540020 +++$+++ 2010-10-13 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.287028440E09 +++$+++ {{done}} --<span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ ::{{done}} --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter |WhiteWriter ]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 20:54, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

277878 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-07 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.260246300E09 +++$+++ Friendly caution here.  You're on your third reversion right now with the Obama campaign wording.  I know it must be frustrating and I'm slightly on your side regarding the content, but reverting while talking probably makes people dig in their heels, and I wouldn't want to see you get into trouble shy of 4RR due to the article probation.  Cheers, -  +++$+++ Friendly caution here.  You're on your third reversion right now with the Obama campaign wording.  I know it must be frustrating and I'm slightly on your side regarding the content, but reverting while talking probably makes people dig in their heels, and I wouldn't want to see you get into trouble shy of 4RR due to the article probation.  Cheers, - [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 20:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
277879 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277878 +++$+++ 277878 +++$+++ 2009-12-07 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.260247680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the warning.  I ''am'' frustrated at the obstinence of two editors (one in particular) who are editing while yelling by declaring victory and consensus where there is none.  If this minor modification can survive, I see no more reason for me to edit the section.   +++$+++ :Thanks for the warning.  I ''am'' frustrated at the obstinence of two editors (one in particular) who are editing while yelling by declaring victory and consensus where there is none.  If this minor modification can survive, I see no more reason for me to edit the section.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 20:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

277881 +++$+++ Arxiloxos +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-25 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.261756500E09 +++$+++ I don't understand your resistance to including a wikilink from this article to the more detailed article at [[2005 Southern California vs. Notre Dame football game]].  I have made a post at [[Talk:Matt Leinart]] to discuss this.-- +++$+++ I don't understand your resistance to including a wikilink from this article to the more detailed article at [[2005 Southern California vs. Notre Dame football game]].  I have made a post at [[Talk:Matt Leinart]] to discuss this.--[[User:Arxiloxos|Arxiloxos]] ([[User talk:Arxiloxos|talk]]) 07:55, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
277882 +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ QueenofBattle +++$+++ 277881 +++$+++ 277881 +++$+++ 2009-12-25 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.261797000E09 +++$+++ I have responded at the article's talk page.   +++$+++ :I have responded at the article's talk page.  [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle#top|talk]]) 19:10, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

15739 +++$+++ RaccoonFox +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.161944700E09 +++$+++ Ehh...you can take out the radisson and hilton if you wish...it's just htat there's this giant hole in WIndsor right next to the building that's generating huge controversy in Windsor right now... <span style=\"border: 2px solid #330000; text-align:center; background: #C0C0C0; text-color: #DDDDDD; link: #A0522D; vlink: #000000\"> ''' +++$+++ Ehh...you can take out the radisson and hilton if you wish...it's just htat there's this giant hole in WIndsor right next to the building that's generating huge controversy in Windsor right now... <span style="border: 2px solid #330000; text-align:center; background: #C0C0C0; text-color: #DDDDDD; link: #A0522D; vlink: #000000"> '''[[User:RaccoonFox|RaccoonFox]]''' • [[User talk:RaccoonFox|'''Talk''']] • [[Special:Contributions/RaccoonFox|'''Stalk''']]'''</span> 03:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
15740 +++$+++ RaccoonFox +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15739 +++$+++ 15739 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.161945720E09 +++$+++ very well, but it's late and i have to head out shortly. i will work on the hilton, radisson, and Cleary Auditorium (now part of St. Clair College) articles tomorrow. <span style=\"border: 2px solid #330000; text-align:center; background: #C0C0C0; text-color: #DDDDDD; link: #A0522D; vlink: #000000\"> ''' +++$+++ :very well, but it's late and i have to head out shortly. i will work on the hilton, radisson, and Cleary Auditorium (now part of St. Clair College) articles tomorrow. <span style="border: 2px solid #330000; text-align:center; background: #C0C0C0; text-color: #DDDDDD; link: #A0522D; vlink: #000000"> '''[[User:RaccoonFox|RaccoonFox]]''' • [[User talk:RaccoonFox|'''Talk''']] • [[Special:Contributions/RaccoonFox|'''Stalk''']]'''</span> 03:42, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

540028 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540028 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-26 08:16:00 +++$+++ 1.288106160E09 +++$+++ you are right, my hook was really weak :-( . Actually, I think that the predestined hook for this article would be one related to the legend of the frying fishes. I tried to summarize it to an acceptable length, but it comes out always too long. I saw your alternative hooks and the answer of Constantine, for me are OK. If in the meantime I will manage to shorten the fish hook  reasonably, I will write it together with the others and then we can discuss what is the best. Otherwise, let's go on with the marriage. Actually, I never saw one father-in-law destroying the marriage church of his son, and the other rebuilding it in so little time :-) Many thanks and cheers,  +++$+++ you are right, my hook was really weak :-( . Actually, I think that the predestined hook for this article would be one related to the legend of the frying fishes. I tried to summarize it to an acceptable length, but it comes out always too long. I saw your alternative hooks and the answer of Constantine, for me are OK. If in the meantime I will manage to shorten the fish hook  reasonably, I will write it together with the others and then we can discuss what is the best. Otherwise, let's go on with the marriage. Actually, I never saw one father-in-law destroying the marriage church of his son, and the other rebuilding it in so little time :-) Many thanks and cheers, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 08:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
540029 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540028 +++$+++ 540028 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.288122180E09 +++$+++ thanks a lot again! I made a minor change: if for you is ok, I think that we can adopt it! Cheers,  +++$+++ :thanks a lot again! I made a minor change: if for you is ok, I think that we can adopt it! Cheers, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 12:43, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
540030 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540028 +++$+++ 540029 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.288124580E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Cheers, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 13:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
540031 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540028 +++$+++ 540030 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.288125840E09 +++$+++ 1-1, Todor. :-) It should be \"The City\". What if we do so? [[Fall of Constantinople|conquest]] of [[Names_of_Istanbul#Other_Byzantine_names|The City]] . Very sophisticated, and a lot of info in two links...A hook in the hook! :-) It is true that this is a Greek Usage, but on a (beautiful) Italian book on the subject which I bought last week it is named \"La Citt\xe0\"...The usage is becoming universal...Cheers,  +++$+++ :::1-1, Todor. :-) It should be "The City". What if we do so? [[Fall of Constantinople|conquest]] of [[Names_of_Istanbul#Other_Byzantine_names|The City]] . Very sophisticated, and a lot of info in two links...A hook in the hook! :-) It is true that this is a Greek Usage, but on a (beautiful) Italian book on the subject which I bought last week it is named "La Città"...The usage is becoming universal...Cheers, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 13:44, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
540032 +++$+++ Alessandro57 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540028 +++$+++ 540031 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.288183320E09 +++$+++ OK Todor, Thanks! Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::OK Todor, Thanks! Cheers, [[User:Alessandro57|Alex2006]] ([[User talk:Alessandro57|talk]]) 05:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

90005 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Kaguya-chan +++$+++ 90005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-16 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.300331580E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film|project talk page]]. We look forward to working with you in the future!  +++$+++ If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film|project talk page]]. We look forward to working with you in the future! [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 20:13, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
90006 +++$+++ Kaguya-chan +++$+++ Kaguya-chan +++$+++ 90005 +++$+++ 90005 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.300331760E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I'll definitely have to check it out.  +++$+++ :Thank you. I'll definitely have to check it out. [[User:Kaguya-chan|Kaguya-chan]] ([[User talk:Kaguya-chan#top|talk]]) 20:16, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
90007 +++$+++ Kaguya-chan +++$+++ Kaguya-chan +++$+++ 90005 +++$+++ 90005 +++$+++ 2011-03-16 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.300333800E09 +++$+++ That's good. ;)  +++$+++ :That's good. ;) [[User:Kaguya-chan|Kaguya-chan]] ([[User talk:Kaguya-chan#top|talk]]) 20:50, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

15744 +++$+++ Plange +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15744 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-02 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.162467360E09 +++$+++ Now ''this'' I would argue is family history and doesn't have a place: [[John Frelinghuysen (1727-1754)]] -- +++$+++ Now ''this'' I would argue is family history and doesn't have a place: [[John Frelinghuysen (1727-1754)]] --[[User:Plange|plange]] 03:36, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
15745 +++$+++ Plange +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15744 +++$+++ 15744 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.162471440E09 +++$+++ Cool idea-- this might be of interest: [[WP:MILHIST#Notability]].... I agree this one is pretty borderline, but since I guess you'd call me an inclusionist, I'm erring on the side of keeping... -- +++$+++ :Cool idea-- this might be of interest: [[WP:MILHIST#Notability]].... I agree this one is pretty borderline, but since I guess you'd call me an inclusionist, I'm erring on the side of keeping... --[[User:Plange|plange]] 04:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

277889 +++$+++ AntzUK +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-06 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.144389960E09 +++$+++ Hi Garry. I've removed the ITV links you put in the articles as all the links are already directly below them in the infobox ([[Template:ITV]]). Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Garry. I've removed the ITV links you put in the articles as all the links are already directly below them in the infobox ([[Template:ITV]]). Cheers, [[User:AntzUK|<span style="color:#3300FF;"><b>Antz</b></span><span style="color:#009900;">UK</span>]] 23:06, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
277890 +++$+++ Ant ie +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277889 +++$+++ 277889 +++$+++ 2006-04-24 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.145930400E09 +++$+++ I have removed your external link to [[ITV4]] on [[Department S]] again. It does not follow [[Wikipedia:External links]] which many users agree on. If you disagree, please state why you think the link is revelant. There is already an internal link to ITV 4, which contains the external link for ITV 4.  +++$+++ :I have removed your external link to [[ITV4]] on [[Department S]] again. It does not follow [[Wikipedia:External links]] which many users agree on. If you disagree, please state why you think the link is revelant. There is already an internal link to ITV 4, which contains the external link for ITV 4. [[User:Ant ie|ant_ie]] 19:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
277891 +++$+++ Digresser +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277889 +++$+++ 277889 +++$+++ 2006-04-27 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.146148140E09 +++$+++ I have removed your external ITV links, as they merely link to ITV's home page, which is not relevant to the articles they correspond with. Thank you! - +++$+++ : I have removed your external ITV links, as they merely link to ITV's home page, which is not relevant to the articles they correspond with. Thank you! -[[User:Digresser|Digresser]] 07:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
277892 +++$+++ Doldrums +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277889 +++$+++ 277891 +++$+++ 2006-04-29 07:38:00 +++$+++ 1.146321480E09 +++$+++ ditto, at [[Benny Hill]].  +++$+++ ::ditto, at [[Benny Hill]]. [[User:Doldrums|Doldrums]] 07:38, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

540035 +++$+++ ZjarriRrethues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-28 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.288301040E09 +++$+++ I started the article and according to the sources I found he was a Bulgarian, but an IP changed it to Macedonia [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lazar_Poptrajkov&diff=393428891&oldid=383995971], so you might want to verify that.--<span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ I started the article and according to the sources I found he was a Bulgarian, but an IP changed it to Macedonia [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lazar_Poptrajkov&diff=393428891&oldid=383995971], so you might want to verify that.--<span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:ZjarriRrethues|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''ZjarriRrethues''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:ZjarriRrethues|talk]]</sup> 14:24, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
540036 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540035 +++$+++ 540035 +++$+++ 2010-10-28 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.288301880E09 +++$+++ Hi! This is regular vandalism, though it should be a better idea to follow something like [[Yane Sandanski]] for the lead section and the ethnicity qualifier. <span style=\"text-align: center; clear: both; font-family:Georgia, serif; font-size: 10pt; font-variant: small-caps; font-style: normal;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ : Hi! This is regular vandalism, though it should be a better idea to follow something like [[Yane Sandanski]] for the lead section and the ethnicity qualifier. <span style="text-align: center; clear: both; font-family:Georgia, serif; font-size: 10pt; font-variant: small-caps; font-style: normal;"> — [[User:TodorBozhinov|Toдor]] [[User talk:TodorBozhinov|Boжinov]] —</span> 14:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
540037 +++$+++ ZjarriRrethues +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540035 +++$+++ 540036 +++$+++ 2010-10-28 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.288302840E09 +++$+++ That's probably the most npov that could be created to approach the Macedonian opinion.--<span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ ::That's probably the most npov that could be created to approach the Macedonian opinion.--<span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:ZjarriRrethues|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''ZjarriRrethues''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:ZjarriRrethues|talk]]</sup> 14:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

15748 +++$+++ MarSch +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15748 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-03 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.165183560E09 +++$+++ I've removed your proposed deletion of [[The Design and Evolution of C++]]. I'd say it is probably the second most important book about [[C++]], after [[The C++ Programming Language]] and that book is unfortunately also still a stub (added at the same time by me). -- +++$+++ I've removed your proposed deletion of [[The Design and Evolution of C++]]. I'd say it is probably the second most important book about [[C++]], after [[The C++ Programming Language]] and that book is unfortunately also still a stub (added at the same time by me). --[[User:MarSch|MarSch]] 14:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
15749 +++$+++ MarSch +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15748 +++$+++ 15748 +++$+++ 2006-12-03 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.165193700E09 +++$+++ I expect a lot can be written about it. -- +++$+++ :I expect a lot can be written about it. --[[User:MarSch|MarSch]] 16:55, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

15751 +++$+++ Scott Mingus +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.165454700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking the lead in looking at these articles. As a member of the Wiki Project for Ohio articles, I strongly urge you to take up your case at that project team directly. Articles tagged by and maintained by a dedicated Wiki project team should never be arbitrarily removed or deleted without consensus of that team (which you may easily get, but the team needs to know!). Thanks, and best wishes!  +++$+++ Thanks for taking the lead in looking at these articles. As a member of the Wiki Project for Ohio articles, I strongly urge you to take up your case at that project team directly. Articles tagged by and maintained by a dedicated Wiki project team should never be arbitrarily removed or deleted without consensus of that team (which you may easily get, but the team needs to know!). Thanks, and best wishes! [[User:Scott Mingus|Scott Mingus]] 17:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
15752 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15751 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.165819860E09 +++$+++ I am in general an inclusionist, but I think the other stuff you are listing on AfD are things that should be deleted & I'll support you on the articles where support is necessary. See you there.  +++$+++ ::I am in general an inclusionist, but I think the other stuff you are listing on AfD are things that should be deleted & I'll support you on the articles where support is necessary. See you there. [[User:DGG|DGG]] 22:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

614295 +++$+++ Jim62sch +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-31 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.275354180E09 +++$+++ Dave, this [[(Pronounced 'L\u0115h-'n\xe9rd 'Skin-'n\xe9rd)|article]] looks over-linked to me but I can't remember the over-linking guidelines. Help!  +++$+++ Dave, this [[(Pronounced 'Lĕh-'nérd 'Skin-'nérd)|article]] looks over-linked to me but I can't remember the over-linking guidelines. Help! [[User:Jim62sch|<font face="Times New Roman" color="FF2400">&#0149;Jim</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="F4C430">62</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="000000">sch&#0149;</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Jim62sch|dissera!]]</sup> 18:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
614296 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614295 +++$+++ 614295 +++$+++ 2010-05-31 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.275355260E09 +++$+++ Hi, good to see you in action again! Off the cuff I can't remember where the guidelines are, will have a look later. From memory, each link should be providing useful info specific to the article, links can be repeated in new sections but not too often. Thus, in ''Album cover'' it's probably overlinking to repeat the link to [[Lynyrd Skynyrd]] who've already been linked twice, in the ''Track listing'' section I'd only link the (songwriter?) names once, then repeat the names unlinked \u2013 i.e. Gary Rossington and Ronnie Van Zant would be linked at track 1 but not afterwards, Allen Collins would be linked on track 2 but not afterwards, and so on. However, I'd link the names again in the ''Personnel'' section for people who skip to that section and don't want to look for them in the track listing bit. Hope that's ok, will try to find a guideline later! . .  +++$+++ :Hi, good to see you in action again! Off the cuff I can't remember where the guidelines are, will have a look later. From memory, each link should be providing useful info specific to the article, links can be repeated in new sections but not too often. Thus, in ''Album cover'' it's probably overlinking to repeat the link to [[Lynyrd Skynyrd]] who've already been linked twice, in the ''Track listing'' section I'd only link the (songwriter?) names once, then repeat the names unlinked – i.e. Gary Rossington and Ronnie Van Zant would be linked at track 1 but not afterwards, Allen Collins would be linked on track 2 but not afterwards, and so on. However, I'd link the names again in the ''Personnel'' section for people who skip to that section and don't want to look for them in the track listing bit. Hope that's ok, will try to find a guideline later! . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
614297 +++$+++ Guettarda +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614295 +++$+++ 614296 +++$+++ 2010-05-31 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.275356460E09 +++$+++ Hey Jim. Happy to see you back. I think the rules on linking have evolved over the last year towards even less linking. No dates. And don't link common terms. [[WP:OVERLINK]] is the relevant bit of the guideline.  +++$+++ ::Hey Jim. Happy to see you back. I think the rules on linking have evolved over the last year towards even less linking. No dates. And don't link common terms. [[WP:OVERLINK]] is the relevant bit of the guideline. [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 18:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
614298 +++$+++ Jim62sch +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614295 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-05-31 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.275374160E09 +++$+++ inter-posting here: I thank you both very much.  I might have other questions in re stuff I've fotgotten, so bear with me.   +++$+++ ::::inter-posting here: I thank you both very much.  I might have other questions in re stuff I've fotgotten, so bear with me.  [[User:Jim62sch|<font face="Times New Roman" color="FF2400">&#0149;Jim</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="F4C430">62</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="000000">sch&#0149;</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Jim62sch|dissera!]]</sup> 23:36, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
614299 +++$+++ Yopienso +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614295 +++$+++ 614297 +++$+++ 2010-05-31 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.275361080E09 +++$+++ Please revert if this is the wrong place to ask.  I've seen several footnotes bunched into one but have been unable to figure out how to do it.  How is it done?  Wouldn't that be a partial answer to over-linking?  I consult WP much more often than I edit it, and find a plethora of superscript numbers most unaesthetic and distracting.  In a word, annoying, although being the detail nut I am I do greatly appreciate sourcing.   +++$+++ :::Please revert if this is the wrong place to ask.  I've seen several footnotes bunched into one but have been unable to figure out how to do it.  How is it done?  Wouldn't that be a partial answer to over-linking?  I consult WP much more often than I edit it, and find a plethora of superscript numbers most unaesthetic and distracting.  In a word, annoying, although being the detail nut I am I do greatly appreciate sourcing.  [[User:Yopienso|Yopienso]] ([[User talk:Yopienso|talk]]) 19:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
614300 +++$+++ Guettarda +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614295 +++$+++ 614299 +++$+++ 2010-05-31 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.275362280E09 +++$+++ You can find the \"\u2022\" character if you select \"Symbols\" from the drop-down menu under the [Save page] button.  +++$+++ ::::You can find the "•" character if you select "Symbols" from the drop-down menu under the [Save page] button. [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 20:18, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
614301 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614295 +++$+++ 614295 +++$+++ 2010-06-01 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.275402720E09 +++$+++ Thanks to everyone, particularly Guettarda for pointing out the guidelines. On grouping references, it only works if all the references are being used together \u2013 if only some of the references are being cited multiple times using the ref name= tag, then it can be best to leave them out of the grouping. As always, there are probably many ways round it. .  +++$+++ *Thanks to everyone, particularly Guettarda for pointing out the guidelines. On grouping references, it only works if all the references are being used together – if only some of the references are being cited multiple times using the ref name= tag, then it can be best to leave them out of the grouping. As always, there are probably many ways round it. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 07:32, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

15757 +++$+++ Stubbleboy +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15757 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-26 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.167126120E09 +++$+++ Please avoid redirecting a created page unless you've discussed it with the creator first.  I grew up in Westerville, so I watch all the articles about it like a hawk. This article stays.  Thanks!   +++$+++ Please avoid redirecting a created page unless you've discussed it with the creator first.  I grew up in Westerville, so I watch all the articles about it like a hawk. This article stays.  Thanks!  [[User:Stubbleboy|Stubbleboy]] 01:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
15758 +++$+++ Stubbleboy +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15757 +++$+++ 15757 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.167132180E09 +++$+++ You can take it to AFD, however the fact that the library is also home to a museum for the Anti-Saloon League makes it encyclopedic.  I've added a [http:\/\/www.wpl.lib.oh.us\/AntiSaloon\/index.html link] on the page and a section entitled Anti-Saloon League.  I'd like to think that if a student were researching about the [[Anti-Saloon League]] they could find it by accessing this page.  I've also removed the merge tag.  Thanks!   +++$+++ *You can take it to AFD, however the fact that the library is also home to a museum for the Anti-Saloon League makes it encyclopedic.  I've added a [http://www.wpl.lib.oh.us/AntiSaloon/index.html link] on the page and a section entitled Anti-Saloon League.  I'd like to think that if a student were researching about the [[Anti-Saloon League]] they could find it by accessing this page.  I've also removed the merge tag.  Thanks!  [[User:Stubbleboy|Stubbleboy]] 03:23, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
15759 +++$+++ Stubbleboy +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15757 +++$+++ 15757 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.167137160E09 +++$+++ Oh and I never said discuss the merging with me, I said the creator.  Look back and you can clearly see I never claimed to be the creator of said article.   +++$+++ *Oh and I never said discuss the merging with me, I said the creator.  Look back and you can clearly see I never claimed to be the creator of said article.  [[User:Stubbleboy|Stubbleboy]] 04:46, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

540046 +++$+++ Cplakidas +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-18 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.290147660E09 +++$+++ Hello Todor! Indeed a weird case, although it would be nice if we could report an actual ghost attack ;). I have Failler's edition of Pachymeres, and can verify the story (Germe\/\u0393\u03ad\u03c1\u03bc\u03b7 or Soma was a town between Pergamon and Akhisar acc. to Failler's notes). As this is certainly before Roger's death and during his expedition in 1303\/4, I guess your source got it wrong... It is not unusual, late Byzantine chronology is usually a mess, everyone disagrees with everyone else (and Failler gets some dates wrong too). If you need me to check anything else in Failler, feel free to ask. Cheers, my friend.  +++$+++ Hello Todor! Indeed a weird case, although it would be nice if we could report an actual ghost attack ;). I have Failler's edition of Pachymeres, and can verify the story (Germe/Γέρμη or Soma was a town between Pergamon and Akhisar acc. to Failler's notes). As this is certainly before Roger's death and during his expedition in 1303/4, I guess your source got it wrong... It is not unusual, late Byzantine chronology is usually a mess, everyone disagrees with everyone else (and Failler gets some dates wrong too). If you need me to check anything else in Failler, feel free to ask. Cheers, my friend. [[User:Cplakidas|Constantine]]  [[User talk:Cplakidas| ✍ ]] 22:21, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
540047 +++$+++ Cplakidas +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540046 +++$+++ 540046 +++$+++ 2010-11-21 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.290391680E09 +++$+++ Hello again! As you may have noticed, I have recently become interested in the Arab opponents of Byzantium, whose coverage, let alone the quality of the existing articles, is woefully lacking. As I want to throw some spotlight on them, do you have any good DYK hook suggestions for [[Sulayman ibn Hisham]] and\/or [[Nasr ibn Sayyar]]? Thanks in advance,  +++$+++ :Hello again! As you may have noticed, I have recently become interested in the Arab opponents of Byzantium, whose coverage, let alone the quality of the existing articles, is woefully lacking. As I want to throw some spotlight on them, do you have any good DYK hook suggestions for [[Sulayman ibn Hisham]] and/or [[Nasr ibn Sayyar]]? Thanks in advance, [[User:Cplakidas|Constantine]]  [[User talk:Cplakidas| ✍ ]] 18:08, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
540048 +++$+++ Cplakidas +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540046 +++$+++ 540047 +++$+++ 2010-11-21 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.290405060E09 +++$+++ Very good proposals. Thanks :)  +++$+++ ::Very good proposals. Thanks :) [[User:Cplakidas|Constantine]]  [[User talk:Cplakidas| ✍ ]] 21:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

15760 +++$+++ NE2 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15760 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-28 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.167375840E09 +++$+++ I'm removing the deletion tag. Please see the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Ghost ramp (second nomination)]]. -- +++$+++ I'm removing the deletion tag. Please see the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost ramp (second nomination)]]. --[[User:NE2|NE2]] 23:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
15761 +++$+++ NE2 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15760 +++$+++ 15760 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.167376260E09 +++$+++ I disagree; I think the concept is what is most important (and I have expanded [[unused highway]] a bit). I don't think we need a list of every place a highway has ever sat unused. -- +++$+++ :I disagree; I think the concept is what is most important (and I have expanded [[unused highway]] a bit). I don't think we need a list of every place a highway has ever sat unused. --[[User:NE2|NE2]] 23:11, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

15762 +++$+++ Georgewilliamherbert +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15762 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-30 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.167540240E09 +++$+++ This all came about because we had a really bad rename as the result of a contested AFD nomination.  Renaming an article \"List of unused highways\" when every single entry was for a ramp, not a road section, just isn't working...  +++$+++ This all came about because we had a really bad rename as the result of a contested AFD nomination.  Renaming an article "List of unused highways" when every single entry was for a ramp, not a road section, just isn't working... [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] 20:44, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
15763 +++$+++ NE2 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15762 +++$+++ 15762 +++$+++ 2006-12-30 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.167540480E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:NE2|NE2]] 20:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

15764 +++$+++ NE2 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-30 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.167540480E09 +++$+++ I think [[list of unused highways]] is a bad idea for an article, but look where the deletion discussion went. [[Unused highway]] is an attempt to cover the concept without a huge list of examples. -- +++$+++ I think [[list of unused highways]] is a bad idea for an article, but look where the deletion discussion went. [[Unused highway]] is an attempt to cover the concept without a huge list of examples. --[[User:NE2|NE2]] 20:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
15765 +++$+++ Georgewilliamherbert +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15764 +++$+++ 15764 +++$+++ 2006-12-30 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.167541140E09 +++$+++ I appear to have missed a couple of examples in a list of about fifty.  The fact remains: the article is ''almost'' entirely about highway ramps, and is currently clearly misnamed.  The deletion discussion went badly for a number of reasons, including people who like that particular listcruft, and a really terrible rename concept, and a number of sources being ignored repeatedly.  What we probably should have is an article on unused freeway ramps ([[Unused highway ramp]], redirect from [[Stub ramp]]), an article on unused freeway road segments ([[Unused highway]]), and shorter lists on each one ([[List of unused highway ramps]], ([[List of unused highways]]).  The current situation isn't helping anyone.   +++$+++ :I appear to have missed a couple of examples in a list of about fifty.  The fact remains: the article is ''almost'' entirely about highway ramps, and is currently clearly misnamed.  The deletion discussion went badly for a number of reasons, including people who like that particular listcruft, and a really terrible rename concept, and a number of sources being ignored repeatedly.  What we probably should have is an article on unused freeway ramps ([[Unused highway ramp]], redirect from [[Stub ramp]]), an article on unused freeway road segments ([[Unused highway]]), and shorter lists on each one ([[List of unused highway ramps]], ([[List of unused highways]]).  The current situation isn't helping anyone.  [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] 20:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

46318 +++$+++ Nick-D +++$+++ Saberwyn +++$+++ 46318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-05 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.296929220E09 +++$+++ It's happening again, though at least this time you're being acknowledged: http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/41311545@N05\/5414993011\/ http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/41311545@N05\/5415573078\/ They're uploading the photos as copyright protected, however, rather than the CC-compliant licences which are legally required.  +++$+++ It's happening again, though at least this time you're being acknowledged: http://www.flickr.com/photos/41311545@N05/5414993011/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/41311545@N05/5415573078/ They're uploading the photos as copyright protected, however, rather than the CC-compliant licences which are legally required. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 10:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
46319 +++$+++ Saberwyn +++$+++ Saberwyn +++$+++ 46318 +++$+++ 46318 +++$+++ 2011-02-05 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.296972000E09 +++$+++ I've left a question at [[Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#cc-by-sa-3.0.2FGFDL_images_uploaded_to_Flickr_as_copyright_reserved]] asking how to proceed with this, and have alerted [[User:Ajayvius]], who is the uploader of one of the images. --  +++$+++ :I've left a question at [[Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#cc-by-sa-3.0.2FGFDL_images_uploaded_to_Flickr_as_copyright_reserved]] asking how to proceed with this, and have alerted [[User:Ajayvius]], who is the uploader of one of the images. -- [[User:Saberwyn|saberwyn]] 22:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

15766 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-30 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.167541200E09 +++$+++ A ramp and a highway are sometimes hard to tell apart - some \"ramps\" go on for miles. However, I suppose someone could make some criteria up and then sort the article into ramps and highways.  Then, a few months down the line, the article could be split in two.  Of course, as a deletionist what I would do is go through and eliminate everything that is unreferenced and sounds non-notable - which would probably reduce the article by 75% or more. Unfortunately, the \"highwayspotters\" wouldn't stand for it, I'm sure. :-) -- +++$+++ A ramp and a highway are sometimes hard to tell apart - some "ramps" go on for miles. However, I suppose someone could make some criteria up and then sort the article into ramps and highways.  Then, a few months down the line, the article could be split in two.  Of course, as a deletionist what I would do is go through and eliminate everything that is unreferenced and sounds non-notable - which would probably reduce the article by 75% or more. Unfortunately, the "highwayspotters" wouldn't stand for it, I'm sure. :-) --[[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] 21:00, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
15767 +++$+++ NE2 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15766 +++$+++ 15766 +++$+++ 2006-12-30 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.167541920E09 +++$+++ That's exactly what I was going to say - there is no clear line between ramps and highways. And wherever we draw the line, there will be some places that have both, and so the two lists will be duplicative. -- +++$+++ :That's exactly what I was going to say - there is no clear line between ramps and highways. And wherever we draw the line, there will be some places that have both, and so the two lists will be duplicative. --[[User:NE2|NE2]] 21:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

90009 +++$+++ Golden Sugarplum +++$+++ Kaguya-chan +++$+++ 90009 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.300364040E09 +++$+++ Trimming done. The result is a mix of mine and your suggestions. The word \"flee\" in the endings' paragraph is maybe wrong (the noun is flee or fleeing?). If you find anything else that's unnecessary delete it or tell me to do it. Now Kaufmann's alliance with Dahlia should be added and I think the plot section will be done.  +++$+++ Trimming done. The result is a mix of mine and your suggestions. The word "flee" in the endings' paragraph is maybe wrong (the noun is flee or fleeing?). If you find anything else that's unnecessary delete it or tell me to do it. Now Kaufmann's alliance with Dahlia should be added and I think the plot section will be done. [[User:Golden Sugarplum|Golden Sugarplum]] ([[User talk:Golden Sugarplum|talk]]) 05:14, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
90010 +++$+++ Kaguya-chan +++$+++ Kaguya-chan +++$+++ 90009 +++$+++ 90009 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.300648740E09 +++$+++ Yeah, it's perfectly fine to say \"Alchemilla\" the second time around. Hospitalized is accurate for what happened to Alessa, so personally I would keep the wording. Are you thinking of institutionalized? That's less specific and could refer to a lot of things.  +++$+++ :Yeah, it's perfectly fine to say "Alchemilla" the second time around. Hospitalized is accurate for what happened to Alessa, so personally I would keep the wording. Are you thinking of institutionalized? That's less specific and could refer to a lot of things. [[User:Kaguya-chan|Kaguya-chan]] ([[User talk:Kaguya-chan#top|talk]]) 12:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

15770 +++$+++  +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15770 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-10 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.168478520E09 +++$+++ Hi, I was on vacation when you proposed the [[Calgary Esperanto Centre]] for deletion.  Could you link me to the discussion of this article's deletion?  Thank you.  --Chuck SMITH 17:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ Hi, I was on vacation when you proposed the [[Calgary Esperanto Centre]] for deletion.  Could you link me to the discussion of this article's deletion?  Thank you.  --Chuck SMITH 17:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
15771 +++$+++ A. B. +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15770 +++$+++ 15770 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.168731120E09 +++$+++ Additional comment: The note above is the standard AfD courtesy note for people that have edited an article sent to AfD. You originally [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=TEFLWatch&diff=84988733&oldid=74323008 proposed this article for deletion] 1 November 2006; the article's author subsequently [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=TEFLWatch&diff=next&oldid=84988733 removed the PROD tag]. Here's the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=TEFLWatch&action=history article's edit history]. -- +++$+++ :Additional comment: The note above is the standard AfD courtesy note for people that have edited an article sent to AfD. You originally [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TEFLWatch&diff=84988733&oldid=74323008 proposed this article for deletion] 1 November 2006; the article's author subsequently [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TEFLWatch&diff=next&oldid=84988733 removed the PROD tag]. Here's the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TEFLWatch&action=history article's edit history]. --[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 15:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

277916 +++$+++ Whouk +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-29 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.146318720E09 +++$+++ Hi. I notice you've added a link to the ITV website to all sorts of programme pages. Please restrict links to articles to which they are directly relevant. ITV shows can link to the ITV article, which then links to itv.com. Links should expand on the information available on the page. See [[Wikipedia:External links]]. Thanks. &mdash;[[User:Whouk|Wh]][[User:Whouk\/Esperanza|<span style=\"cursor:help\"><font color=\"green\">o<\/font><\/span>]] +++$+++ Hi. I notice you've added a link to the ITV website to all sorts of programme pages. Please restrict links to articles to which they are directly relevant. ITV shows can link to the ITV article, which then links to itv.com. Links should expand on the information available on the page. See [[Wikipedia:External links]]. Thanks. &mdash;[[User:Whouk|Wh]][[User:Whouk/Esperanza|<span style="cursor:help"><font color="green">o</font></span>]][[User:Whouk|uk]] <small>([[User talk:Whouk|talk]])</small> 06:52, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
277917 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277916 +++$+++ 277916 +++$+++ 2006-04-29 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.146325260E09 +++$+++ You are adding itv.com to all of the articles of programmes shown on ITV. Could you please explain why? We much prefer that articles contain only specific links to that topic. Anyone wishing for more information on ITV can easily go to the ITV article, which is the appropriate place for a link to ITV.com.  +++$+++ :You are adding itv.com to all of the articles of programmes shown on ITV. Could you please explain why? We much prefer that articles contain only specific links to that topic. Anyone wishing for more information on ITV can easily go to the ITV article, which is the appropriate place for a link to ITV.com. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 08:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

277918 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-29 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.146347520E09 +++$+++ Hello. We have a project in which you might be interested. It's at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject British TV shows]]. One thing you could do, for instance, since you're obviously interested in ITV, is to add the infobox to some programme articles, like the one that is on ''[[Boon (TV series)]]''. Don't worry about the images: just leave that field blank. Try not to do too many at once: try to get feedback of what you've done from a more experienced editor -- I'm more than happy to do that.  +++$+++ Hello. We have a project in which you might be interested. It's at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject British TV shows]]. One thing you could do, for instance, since you're obviously interested in ITV, is to add the infobox to some programme articles, like the one that is on ''[[Boon (TV series)]]''. Don't worry about the images: just leave that field blank. Try not to do too many at once: try to get feedback of what you've done from a more experienced editor -- I'm more than happy to do that. [[User:The JPS|The JPS]] 14:52, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
277919 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277918 +++$+++ 277918 +++$+++ 2006-04-29 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.146373920E09 +++$+++ Hey - you've done a really good job so far. Thanks for adding those boxes. One thing, though -- for British television programmes, we are trying to use the style used in the ''[[Boon (TV series)]]'' article. It would be great if you could use that one. There is no need to undo the work you've already done, though, so there's no need to go back and change what you've done today. Keep up the good work! I see you've taken Redvers' advice and started to use edit summaries too! Yay!  +++$+++ :Hey - you've done a really good job so far. Thanks for adding those boxes. One thing, though -- for British television programmes, we are trying to use the style used in the ''[[Boon (TV series)]]'' article. It would be great if you could use that one. There is no need to undo the work you've already done, though, so there's no need to go back and change what you've done today. Keep up the good work! I see you've taken Redvers' advice and started to use edit summaries too! Yay! [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
277920 +++$+++ AntzUK +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277918 +++$+++ 277919 +++$+++ 2006-04-29 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.146374760E09 +++$+++ As said above, try to use the British TV programme infobox instead of the international one. Just to make it all look similar. To join the project, just add your name to the user list on the link above. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::As said above, try to use the British TV programme infobox instead of the international one. Just to make it all look similar. To join the project, just add your name to the user list on the link above. Cheers, [[User:AntzUK|<span style="color:#3300FF;"><b>Antz</b></span><span style="color:#009900;">UK</span>]] 22:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

15778 +++$+++ Fundamentaldan +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15778 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-02 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.170465480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up. I posted my thoughts on there.   +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up. I posted my thoughts on there.  [[User:Fundamentaldan|Fundamentaldan]] 17:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
15779 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15778 +++$+++ 15778 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.170718980E09 +++$+++ Well, if it does, provide some references the next time you create an article on them - probably some newspaper articles that mention them. And try adding the info to the Christchurch article instead of creating an article just for the gang. -- +++$+++ *Well, if it does, provide some references the next time you create an article on them - probably some newspaper articles that mention them. And try adding the info to the Christchurch article instead of creating an article just for the gang. --[[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] 15:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

15781 +++$+++ Soltak +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15781 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-09 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.171090500E09 +++$+++ I am somewhat familiar with bundling AfD nominations, though I've never done it. After I discovered the category, however, I thought it would be a waste of space to list every single article therein, instead just citing the whole category. Shockingly, it's made up of over 200 articles.  +++$+++ I am somewhat familiar with bundling AfD nominations, though I've never done it. After I discovered the category, however, I thought it would be a waste of space to list every single article therein, instead just citing the whole category. Shockingly, it's made up of over 200 articles. [[User:Soltak|Soltak]] | [[User_talk:Soltak|Talk]] 22:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
15782 +++$+++ Soltak +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15781 +++$+++ 15781 +++$+++ 2007-02-09 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.171093080E09 +++$+++ I suppose you're right ... I guess what I'll do is wait for these three AfD's to end. If they're successful, I'll begin putting up the remaining articles in batches as you suggest. Thanks!  +++$+++ *I suppose you're right ... I guess what I'll do is wait for these three AfD's to end. If they're successful, I'll begin putting up the remaining articles in batches as you suggest. Thanks! [[User:Soltak|Soltak]] | [[User_talk:Soltak|Talk]] 23:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

540070 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-21 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.292983440E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 18:04, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
540071 +++$+++ Codrinb +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540070 +++$+++ 540070 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.292991960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the detailed [[User talk:Codrinb#Decree of Dionysopolis|reply]] and clarifications. Makes sense.-- +++$+++ : Thanks for the detailed [[User talk:Codrinb#Decree of Dionysopolis|reply]] and clarifications. Makes sense.--[[User:Codrinb|Codrinb]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 20:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

277930 +++$+++ FreplySpang +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-13 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.147574880E09 +++$+++ We appreciate your interest in creating an article about [[Alison MacGregor]], but we cannot accept [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrighted]] text or images borrowed from other websites. If you want to rewrite the article in your own words, it would be great. For more information, see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ|Copyright FAQ]]. Thanks,  +++$+++ We appreciate your interest in creating an article about [[Alison MacGregor]], but we cannot accept [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrighted]] text or images borrowed from other websites. If you want to rewrite the article in your own words, it would be great. For more information, see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ|Copyright FAQ]]. Thanks, [[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] [[User talk:FreplySpang|(talk)]] 19:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
277931 +++$+++ FreplySpang +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277930 +++$+++ 277930 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.147575300E09 +++$+++ The same goes for [[Mike Edwards (journalist)]] and [[Rae Stewart]]. We really do appreciate your eagerness to expand Wikipedia's coverage in this area, but we just can't accept text from other websites. If you've created other articles by cutting and pasting from Scotland Today or other websites, please go back and remove the copied text. Than you very much,  +++$+++ * The same goes for [[Mike Edwards (journalist)]] and [[Rae Stewart]]. We really do appreciate your eagerness to expand Wikipedia's coverage in this area, but we just can't accept text from other websites. If you've created other articles by cutting and pasting from Scotland Today or other websites, please go back and remove the copied text. Than you very much, [[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] [[User talk:FreplySpang|(talk)]] 19:55, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

526919 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526919 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-23 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.198402020E09 +++$+++ Could you look over [[User:Marine 69-71\/Workshop2|Angel Mendez]] and provide any of the missing links? Thanks.  +++$+++ Could you look over [[User:Marine 69-71/Workshop2|Angel Mendez]] and provide any of the missing links? Thanks. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 01:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
526920 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526919 +++$+++ 526919 +++$+++ 2007-12-23 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.198404720E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I think Angel Mendez will be a good story for the portal. What do you think?  +++$+++ *Thanks, I think Angel Mendez will be a good story for the portal. What do you think? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 02:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
526921 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526919 +++$+++ 526919 +++$+++ 2007-12-23 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.198414200E09 +++$+++ SLF, Looper already took care of it.  +++$+++ :SLF, Looper already took care of it. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 04:50, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

277932 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-13 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.147576320E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 20:12, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
277933 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277932 +++$+++ 277932 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.147882980E09 +++$+++ Why did you upload [[:Image:SoccerAid.gif]] after I left this message without providing the fair use rationale I have advised you about? You are wasting your time and mine.  +++$+++ :Why did you upload [[:Image:SoccerAid.gif]] after I left this message without providing the fair use rationale I have advised you about? You are wasting your time and mine. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 09:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

15791 +++$+++ JimDunning +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15791 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.171801080E09 +++$+++ <span style=\"color: #000099\">&mdash;<\/span><small><span style=\"border: 1px solid #000099\"> +++$+++ <span style="color: #000099">&mdash;</span><small><span style="border: 1px solid #000099">[[User:JimDunning|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#000099"> &nbsp;Jim Dunning&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:JimDunning|<span style="background-color:#000099; color:white">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span>&nbsp;:&nbsp;</small> 04:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
15792 +++$+++ JimDunning +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15791 +++$+++ 15791 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.171803840E09 +++$+++ <span style=\"color: #000099\">&mdash;<\/span><small><span style=\"border: 1px solid #000099\"> +++$+++ :<span style="color: #000099">&mdash;</span><small><span style="border: 1px solid #000099">[[User:JimDunning|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#000099"> &nbsp;Jim Dunning&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:JimDunning|<span style="background-color:#000099; color:white">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span>&nbsp;:&nbsp;</small> 05:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

277937 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277937 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-17 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.147885440E09 +++$+++ Still no rationale. Not good. Please make it your priority. In the next couple of days all of your images without rationale will be removed from the articles and deleted.  +++$+++ Still no rationale. Not good. Please make it your priority. In the next couple of days all of your images without rationale will be removed from the articles and deleted. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:04, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
277938 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277937 +++$+++ 277937 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.147887540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for expaning it ver so slightly, but it's still not good enough. See [[:Image:Ourfriends.JPG]]. That is what a fair use rationale is supposed to look like.  +++$+++ :Thanks for expaning it ver so slightly, but it's still not good enough. See [[:Image:Ourfriends.JPG]]. That is what a fair use rationale is supposed to look like. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
277939 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277937 +++$+++ 277938 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.147888200E09 +++$+++ I've replied on my talk page. You'll see that the rationale required.  +++$+++ ::I've replied on my talk page. You'll see that the rationale required. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">'''The JPS'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple">talk to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:50, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

15795 +++$+++ Icemuon +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.171835160E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | You may be unpopular in some circles, but I, for one, applaud you for what you are doing:  keeping this encyclopedia, well, encyclopedic.  Keep up the good work.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You may be unpopular in some circles, but I, for one, applaud you for what you are doing:  keeping this encyclopedia, well, encyclopedic.  Keep up the good work. [[User:Icemuon|Icemuon]] 13:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
15796 +++$+++ Icemuon +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15795 +++$+++ 15795 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.171837320E09 +++$+++ You're welcome :-)  I can see you have (and will) suffer verbal assaults, and wanted to let you know you ARE indeed appreciated.  Best regards,  +++$+++ :You're welcome :-)  I can see you have (and will) suffer verbal assaults, and wanted to let you know you ARE indeed appreciated.  Best regards, [[User:Icemuon|Icemuon]] 14:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

15797 +++$+++ KeepOnTruckin +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.171845360E09 +++$+++ WEll it looks like all those FCPS middle schools get to stay, even after the deletion review, which came across to me as though some of the admins were slightly perturbed at you. NOw I dont want to get into personal attacks here, but maybe there are better things you can do with your time on wikipedia, like adding articles and improving current ones instead of just deleting as many as you can. All the Middle school articles can be made better by adding references. If you don't want to do that, may I kindly suggest a wikibreak?  +++$+++ WEll it looks like all those FCPS middle schools get to stay, even after the deletion review, which came across to me as though some of the admins were slightly perturbed at you. NOw I dont want to get into personal attacks here, but maybe there are better things you can do with your time on wikipedia, like adding articles and improving current ones instead of just deleting as many as you can. All the Middle school articles can be made better by adding references. If you don't want to do that, may I kindly suggest a wikibreak? [[User:KeepOnTruckin|KeepOnTruckin]] 16:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
15798 +++$+++ Thepangelinanpost +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15797 +++$+++ 15797 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.171973460E09 +++$+++ Rachel Carson MS was named a \"School to Watch\" in 2004, one out of only 7 in Virginia, and only 4 in 2004, and Luther Jackson was already discussed.  The rest are pretty insignificant, so I can see why they should be deleted.  +++$+++ :Rachel Carson MS was named a "School to Watch" in 2004, one out of only 7 in Virginia, and only 4 in 2004, and Luther Jackson was already discussed.  The rest are pretty insignificant, so I can see why they should be deleted. [[User:Thepangelinanpost|Jordan]] 04:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
15799 +++$+++ Thepangelinanpost +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15797 +++$+++ 15798 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.172042760E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I am the creator of most of these articles, and I now agree that not just any middle schools should be included, due to non-notability.  If I find anything notable for any of the other schools, I'll let you know.  +++$+++ ::Thanks.  I am the creator of most of these articles, and I now agree that not just any middle schools should be included, due to non-notability.  If I find anything notable for any of the other schools, I'll let you know. [[User:Thepangelinanpost|Jordan]] 23:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

15802 +++$+++ Travb +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15802 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-01 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.172741580E09 +++$+++ Which tag (on the actual page) is appropriate for disputes on a policy? Thank you. I appreciate your time. I will watch your page :)  +++$+++ Which tag (on the actual page) is appropriate for disputes on a policy? Thank you. I appreciate your time. I will watch your page :) [[User:Travb|Travb]] ([[User talk:Travb|talk]]) 01:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
15803 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15802 +++$+++ 15802 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.172742120E09 +++$+++ I don't know, offhand.  I'm afraid that I haven't really been a Wikipedia policy wonk. The \"disputed\" tag was obviously inappropriate, though.  The answer may be that there isn't any such tag; there will always be ''someone'' who disagrees with a particular policy page; the question is, does a consensus of Wikipedians continue to support it? You could try running a poll by posting to various places and asking people to vote, but I suspect that you would find that most people support the idea of [[WP:NOTABILITY]] even if they may want to change it one way or another.  +++$+++ *I don't know, offhand.  I'm afraid that I haven't really been a Wikipedia policy wonk. The "disputed" tag was obviously inappropriate, though.  The answer may be that there isn't any such tag; there will always be ''someone'' who disagrees with a particular policy page; the question is, does a consensus of Wikipedians continue to support it? You could try running a poll by posting to various places and asking people to vote, but I suspect that you would find that most people support the idea of [[WP:NOTABILITY]] even if they may want to change it one way or another. [[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] 01:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
15804 +++$+++ Travb +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15802 +++$+++ 15803 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.172748240E09 +++$+++ As I mentioned on the talk page, a poll on the disputetag seems a little overly bureaucratic, I did offer the tag as a comprise, personally changing the policy tag back to the guideline tag.  I hope we can comprimise on this.  It seems looking at the archive page, I don't really know how without involving third parties (which I really want to ultimatly avoid on this particular page), do you have any suggestions?  +++$+++ ::As I mentioned on the talk page, a poll on the disputetag seems a little overly bureaucratic, I did offer the tag as a comprise, personally changing the policy tag back to the guideline tag.  I hope we can comprimise on this.  It seems looking at the archive page, I don't really know how without involving third parties (which I really want to ultimatly avoid on this particular page), do you have any suggestions? [[User:Travb|Travb]] ([[User talk:Travb|talk]]) 03:24, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

15805 +++$+++ Kevin Murray +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15805 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-01 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.172762700E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] 07:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
15806 +++$+++ Radiant! +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15805 +++$+++ 15805 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.172769000E09 +++$+++ Actually the tag is far from innocuous, and is generally used in an attempt to \"bring down\" guidelines if a small minority does not like the existing consensus (to be fair, it has its good uses, but it is frequently abused as such). It should most definitely not be used if three or four people don't like a well-accepted guideline.  +++$+++ *Actually the tag is far from innocuous, and is generally used in an attempt to "bring down" guidelines if a small minority does not like the existing consensus (to be fair, it has its good uses, but it is frequently abused as such). It should most definitely not be used if three or four people don't like a well-accepted guideline. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#DD0000">&gt;<font color="#FF6600">R<font color="#FF9900">a<font color="#FFCC00">d<font color="#FFEE00">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 09:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
15807 +++$+++ Travb +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15805 +++$+++ 15806 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.172812020E09 +++$+++ Brianyoumans no wonder you like [[WP:N]], you use it to delete a lot of other editors work. [[User:Brianyoumans#Pages_Deleted]]  +++$+++ ::Brianyoumans no wonder you like [[WP:N]], you use it to delete a lot of other editors work. [[User:Brianyoumans#Pages_Deleted]] [[User:Travb|Travb]] ([[User talk:Travb|talk]]) 21:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
15808 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15805 +++$+++ 15807 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.172812680E09 +++$+++ Gosh, you found me out.  I guess I failed to hide my deletionist activities carefully enough. :-)  +++$+++ :::Gosh, you found me out.  I guess I failed to hide my deletionist activities carefully enough. :-) [[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] 21:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
15809 +++$+++ Travb +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15805 +++$+++ 15808 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.172831220E09 +++$+++ Happy editing :)  +++$+++ ::::Happy editing :) [[User:Travb|Travb]] ([[User talk:Travb|talk]]) 02:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
15810 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15805 +++$+++ 15809 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.172833500E09 +++$+++ I think the present WP:N (or the proposed one) will do nicely to support my  inclusionism. Depends on what end of the stick you grab. ''' +++$+++ :::::I think the present WP:N (or the proposed one) will do nicely to support my  inclusionism. Depends on what end of the stick you grab. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' 03:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
15811 +++$+++ Radiant! +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15805 +++$+++ 15807 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.172858820E09 +++$+++ Travb - I was responding to Kevin's statement that \"the template is innocuous\", because in my opinion it is not. I was not talking about WP:N, and have not said anything here about consensus (or lack thereof) for that page.  +++$+++ ::*Travb - I was responding to Kevin's statement that "the template is innocuous", because in my opinion it is not. I was not talking about WP:N, and have not said anything here about consensus (or lack thereof) for that page. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#DD0000">&gt;<font color="#FF6600">R<font color="#FF9900">a<font color="#FFCC00">d<font color="#FFEE00">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 10:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
15812 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15805 +++$+++ 15805 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.174092120E09 +++$+++ How about some references from local newspapers about the gang? Actually, I'm pretty convinced that you are just a bored New Zealand teenager who listens to rap music and fancies himself in a gang. Believe me, you don't want a real gang in your town - innocent people get shot, rivals get beaten up and killed, people are afraid to leave their houses... Be happy you live in New Zealand and can fantasize about \"tough streets\".  +++$+++ *How about some references from local newspapers about the gang? Actually, I'm pretty convinced that you are just a bored New Zealand teenager who listens to rap music and fancies himself in a gang. Believe me, you don't want a real gang in your town - innocent people get shot, rivals get beaten up and killed, people are afraid to leave their houses... Be happy you live in New Zealand and can fantasize about "tough streets". [[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] 17:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

277952 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-19 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.150746420E09 +++$+++ I don't think emptying out this category and putting all the articles in category:ITV television programmes was a good idea. That category is already a large category, why make it even larger. It's much handier to have the sitcoms in a subcategory of the category:itv television programmes. See also here [[Wikipedia:Categorization#Organizing categories]]  +++$+++ I don't think emptying out this category and putting all the articles in category:ITV television programmes was a good idea. That category is already a large category, why make it even larger. It's much handier to have the sitcoms in a subcategory of the category:itv television programmes. See also here [[Wikipedia:Categorization#Organizing categories]] [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 12:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
277953 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277952 +++$+++ 277952 +++$+++ 2006-06-19 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.150765560E09 +++$+++ I refilled the category. See also [[Category talk:ITV sitcoms]].  +++$+++ : I refilled the category. See also [[Category talk:ITV sitcoms]]. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 18:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
277954 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277952 +++$+++ 277953 +++$+++ 2006-06-19 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.150776060E09 +++$+++ No problem, it's a wiki after all. Everything is easily changed or changed back.  +++$+++ :: No problem, it's a wiki after all. Everything is easily changed or changed back. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 21:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

540097 +++$+++ Antidiskriminator +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-21 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.295652180E09 +++$+++ Can you help and propose how to improve the first sentence not to mislead the readers about formal administrative division of the Ottoman Empire?-- +++$+++ Can you help and propose how to improve the first sentence not to mislead the readers about formal administrative division of the Ottoman Empire?--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 15:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
540098 +++$+++ Antidiskriminator +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540097 +++$+++ 540097 +++$+++ 2011-01-21 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.295654580E09 +++$+++ I did not want to open that box because I estimated that there is \"made by Pandora\" inscription on it. Therefore I deliberately avoided to insist on any POV in order to keep the article NPOV (I am sure that you know that sometimes you have to be Tom Cruz in mission impossible to do it in topics like this). I propose you to follow my logic and to avoid taking any POV but to simply try to include words claim or promise into first sentence without really suggesting anything about de jure or de facto existence. For now.-- +++$+++ : I did not want to open that box because I estimated that there is "made by Pandora" inscription on it. Therefore I deliberately avoided to insist on any POV in order to keep the article NPOV (I am sure that you know that sometimes you have to be Tom Cruz in mission impossible to do it in topics like this). I propose you to follow my logic and to avoid taking any POV but to simply try to include words claim or promise into first sentence without really suggesting anything about de jure or de facto existence. For now.--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 16:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

277956 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277956 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-30 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.151692020E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Octagon-warning.png|30px]] I'm sory to have to do this, Gary, but I have given you a short block because you are persistantly uploading images without following correct procedure. Yet again, (through [[:Image:ITVPhillipSchofield.jpg]]) you have misused the tv-screenshot tag. It is clearly not a [[screenshot]]. Yet again you have failed to follow the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Publicity photos]]. You are welcome to return whne the block expires shortly, but further violations will result in a longer block.  +++$+++ [[Image:Octagon-warning.png|30px]] I'm sory to have to do this, Gary, but I have given you a short block because you are persistantly uploading images without following correct procedure. Yet again, (through [[:Image:ITVPhillipSchofield.jpg]]) you have misused the tv-screenshot tag. It is clearly not a [[screenshot]]. Yet again you have failed to follow the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Publicity photos]]. You are welcome to return whne the block expires shortly, but further violations will result in a longer block. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
277957 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277956 +++$+++ 277956 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.151692320E09 +++$+++ BTW, you have made some very useful contributions, and we thank you for it. We would really like you to carry on with these. But I really must stress the importance of copyright and following advice and guidelines.  +++$+++ :BTW, you have made some very useful contributions, and we thank you for it. We would really like you to carry on with these. But I really must stress the importance of copyright and following advice and guidelines. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 11:32, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

570614 +++$+++ Sasuke Sarutobi +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-15 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.234746780E09 +++$+++ \u2014  +++$+++ — [[User:Sasuke Sarutobi|Sasuke Sarutobi]] ([[User talk:Sasuke Sarutobi|talk]]) 17:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
570615 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570614 +++$+++ 570614 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.234776600E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 01:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

277958 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-01 10:12:00 +++$+++ 1.151773920E09 +++$+++ In what way do the GMTV images, such as [[:Image:GMTVAndreaMcLean.jpg]], conform with the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Publicity photos]]? Where is the statement on the website saying that it is a press kit, and the images can be reproduced?  +++$+++ In what way do the GMTV images, such as [[:Image:GMTVAndreaMcLean.jpg]], conform with the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Publicity photos]]? Where is the statement on the website saying that it is a press kit, and the images can be reproduced? [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:12, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
277959 +++$+++ GarryMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277958 +++$+++ 277958 +++$+++ 2006-07-01 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.151798100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:GarryMc|GarryMc]] 16:55, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

483233 +++$+++ Richi +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-09 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.189393380E09 +++$+++ Well spotted. I missed that vandalism ...  +++$+++ Well spotted. I missed that vandalism ... [[User:Richi|richi]] 20:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
483234 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483233 +++$+++ 483233 +++$+++ 2007-09-09 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.189393560E09 +++$+++ Not a problem.  I've watchlisted it now since the vandalism rate is literally 100%.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Not a problem.  I've watchlisted it now since the vandalism rate is literally 100%.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 20:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

277960 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-05 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.152155400E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Octagon-warning.png|30px]]You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for yet again uploading images under the incorrect tag. Yet again, you are misusing tv-[[screenshot]].  +++$+++ [[Image:Octagon-warning.png|30px]]You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for yet again uploading images under the incorrect tag. Yet again, you are misusing tv-[[screenshot]]. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
277961 +++$+++ GarryMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277960 +++$+++ 277960 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.152155760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:GarryMc|GarryMc]] 20:16, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
277962 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277960 +++$+++ 277961 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.152155940E09 +++$+++ They have been modified by the copyright holder.  +++$+++ ::They have been modified by the copyright holder. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

540106 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540106 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-25 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.295964180E09 +++$+++ }}  \u2014 +++$+++ }}  —[[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  06:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
540107 +++$+++ WhiteWriter  +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540106 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.296086760E09 +++$+++ Ohoho!! Congrats!! This is very nice! :) :) :) --<span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ ::Ohoho!! Congrats!! This is very nice! :) :) :) --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter |WhiteWriter ]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 16:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

277963 +++$+++ Wikiwoohoo +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277963 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-08 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.152390000E09 +++$+++ Hi. I noticed that you had uploaded the above image as having been captured by yourself. However, that seems to have been an image I found once before at [http:\/\/www.leeseaman.com leeseaman.com]. Am I right there?  +++$+++ Hi. I noticed that you had uploaded the above image as having been captured by yourself. However, that seems to have been an image I found once before at [http://www.leeseaman.com leeseaman.com]. Am I right there? [[User:Wikiwoohoo|Wikiwoohoo]] 13:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
277964 +++$+++ Wikiwoohoo +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277963 +++$+++ 277963 +++$+++ 2006-07-08 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.152390120E09 +++$+++ To eliminate the problem, I'll upload a similar image from the TV Newsroom as its replacement.  +++$+++ :To eliminate the problem, I'll upload a similar image from the TV Newsroom as its replacement. [[User:Wikiwoohoo|Wikiwoohoo]] 13:22, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
277965 +++$+++ GarryMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277963 +++$+++ 277964 +++$+++ 2006-07-08 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.152391680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:GarryMc|GarryMc]] 13:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
277966 +++$+++ Wikiwoohoo +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277963 +++$+++ 277965 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.152471360E09 +++$+++ My apologies. It just looked similar to the one on that site.  +++$+++ :::My apologies. It just looked similar to the one on that site. [[User:Wikiwoohoo|Wikiwoohoo]] 11:56, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

540108 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540108 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.296196560E09 +++$+++ [[Church of Christ Pantocrator, Nesebar]] \u2013 another good piece of work.  Rather more colourful than all the churches I'm writing about at the moment, but that might be because the weather's better in Bulgaria!  +++$+++ [[Church of Christ Pantocrator, Nesebar]] – another good piece of work.  Rather more colourful than all the churches I'm writing about at the moment, but that might be because the weather's better in Bulgaria! [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 22:36, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
540109 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 540108 +++$+++ 540108 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 08:45:00 +++$+++ 1.296233100E09 +++$+++ In contrast, the average church I write about looks like [[:File:Bodwrog Church - geograph.org.uk - 152480.jpg|this]]... no coloured brickwork here!  +++$+++ :In contrast, the average church I write about looks like [[:File:Bodwrog Church - geograph.org.uk - 152480.jpg|this]]... no coloured brickwork here! [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 08:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

15822 +++$+++ Eclecticology +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-18 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.179537060E09 +++$+++ All Canadian schools are notable.  This is consistent with [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Education in Canada]].   +++$+++ All Canadian schools are notable.  This is consistent with [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Education in Canada]].  [[User:Eclecticology|Eclecticology]] 18:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
15823 +++$+++ Eclecticology +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15822 +++$+++ 15822 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.179581520E09 +++$+++ Your reference to vandal magnets does not rise above the level of speculation.  If developping these articles encourages parents in other jurisdiction to do the same that would be great.  It would certainly help people moving to another city to know about the schools, and to choose a neighborhood that will meet their needs.  I suggest that you back off from passion to deprecate the articles about BC schools.  +++$+++ :Your reference to vandal magnets does not rise above the level of speculation.  If developping these articles encourages parents in other jurisdiction to do the same that would be great.  It would certainly help people moving to another city to know about the schools, and to choose a neighborhood that will meet their needs.  I suggest that you back off from passion to deprecate the articles about BC schools. [[User:Eclecticology|Eclecticology]] 06:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
15824 +++$+++ Eclecticology +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15822 +++$+++ 15822 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.179635280E09 +++$+++ Neither of your claims about what Wikipedia is not are relevant.  The articles are clearly not directory entries even if their current stubbish state may lead to such a premature conclusion.  The information provided and to be provided is clearly relevant to the school under consideration, and thus not indiscriminate.  +++$+++ :Neither of your claims about what Wikipedia is not are relevant.  The articles are clearly not directory entries even if their current stubbish state may lead to such a premature conclusion.  The information provided and to be provided is clearly relevant to the school under consideration, and thus not indiscriminate. [[User:Eclecticology|Eclecticology]] 21:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
15825 +++$+++ Eclecticology +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15822 +++$+++ 15822 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.179741420E09 +++$+++ As a bit of a minor footnote to your comments about Canadian responses I should mention that we are currently in a long weekend in Canada.  It's conceivable that that may have influenced the low response rate.  Some people may not be back to their computers until Tuesday.  +++$+++ :As a bit of a minor footnote to your comments about Canadian responses I should mention that we are currently in a long weekend in Canada.  It's conceivable that that may have influenced the low response rate.  Some people may not be back to their computers until Tuesday. [[User:Eclecticology|Eclecticology]] 02:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

277967 +++$+++ Jon513 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277967 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-10 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.152568560E09 +++$+++ Hi, just a helpful tip - instead of making a new page and copying content there it is easier  just to click on the ''move'' tab at the top of the article (right after the ''edit this page'' and ''history'').  Moving a page this way also keeps the history of the page.  Keep up the good work.   +++$+++ Hi, just a helpful tip - instead of making a new page and copying content there it is easier  just to click on the ''move'' tab at the top of the article (right after the ''edit this page'' and ''history'').  Moving a page this way also keeps the history of the page.  Keep up the good work.  [[User:Jon513|Jon513]] 14:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
277968 +++$+++ GarryMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277967 +++$+++ 277967 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.152568680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:GarryMc|GarryMc]] 14:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

277969 +++$+++ Caerwine +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-17 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.153189980E09 +++$+++ While 10 articles is enough to justify ordinary categories, stub types need at least 60 articles in most cases (30 if there is an associated wikiproject).  Also, stub templates need to be unambiguous, which {{tl|SMG-stub}} isn't. <span style=\"font-family:cursive\"> +++$+++ While 10 articles is enough to justify ordinary categories, stub types need at least 60 articles in most cases (30 if there is an associated wikiproject).  Also, stub templates need to be unambiguous, which {{tl|SMG-stub}} isn't. <span style="font-family:cursive">[[User:Caerwine|Caerwine]]</span> [[User_talk:Caerwine|<small style="font-family:sans-serif;color:darkred">Caerwhine</small>]] 19:33, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
277970 +++$+++ GarryMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277969 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-17 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.153190640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:GarryMc|GarryMc]] 19:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

540116 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-05 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.136529060E09 +++$+++ to unsigned user: and calling my balderdash is?  +++$+++ to unsigned user: and calling my balderdash is? [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 22:31, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
540117 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540116 +++$+++ 540116 +++$+++ 2006-01-05 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.136530020E09 +++$+++ Two wrongs don't make a right. - +++$+++ :Two wrongs don't make a right. -[[User:Will Beback|Will Beback]] 22:47, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
540118 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540116 +++$+++ 540117 +++$+++ 2006-01-06 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.136535000E09 +++$+++ selective enforcement is POV.  +++$+++ ::selective enforcement is POV. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 00:10, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
540119 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540116 +++$+++ 540118 +++$+++ 2006-01-06 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.136543340E09 +++$+++ I've posted a note on the othre editor's page as well. Chill out. - +++$+++ :::I've posted a note on the othre editor's page as well. Chill out. -[[User:Will Beback|Will Beback]] 02:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

277973 +++$+++ Madchester +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-22 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.153636380E09 +++$+++ Please don't use an edit summary of \"Clean Up\" when it's real intention as to add a new image to the page.  The term \"[[Wikipedia:Cleanup|Cleanup]]\" is reserved for formatting, editing or gramatical errors.  Thanks. -- +++$+++ Please don't use an edit summary of "Clean Up" when it's real intention as to add a new image to the page.  The term "[[Wikipedia:Cleanup|Cleanup]]" is reserved for formatting, editing or gramatical errors.  Thanks. --[[User:Madchester|Madchester]] 23:33, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
277974 +++$+++ GarryMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.153636500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:GarryMc|GarryMc]] 23:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

15831 +++$+++ Gwguffey +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15831 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.199343300E09 +++$+++ - +++$+++ -[[User:Gwguffey|Gwguffey]] ([[User talk:Gwguffey|talk]]) 22:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
15832 +++$+++ Gwguffey +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15831 +++$+++ 15831 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.199365620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your thoughts. I appreciate your time. - +++$+++ :Thanks for your thoughts. I appreciate your time. -[[User:Gwguffey|Gwguffey]] ([[User talk:Gwguffey|talk]]) 05:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

540125 +++$+++ Alex Bakharev +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540125 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-14 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.139983380E09 +++$+++ I am fully supportno patronimics in the titles Russian bios (unless there are two equally notable people sharing the same First name and Last name but distinguised by patronimics - in that case First name+Last name should be a disambig), in fact it was a consensus of a discussion on the Russian board. I have moved quite a few of the articles myself, but there are tons more and I am lazy.  +++$+++ I am fully supportno patronimics in the titles Russian bios (unless there are two equally notable people sharing the same First name and Last name but distinguised by patronimics - in that case First name+Last name should be a disambig), in fact it was a consensus of a discussion on the Russian board. I have moved quite a few of the articles myself, but there are tons more and I am lazy. [[User:Alex Bakharev|abakharev]] 22:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
540126 +++$+++ Alex Bakharev +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540125 +++$+++ 540125 +++$+++ 2006-02-14 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.139985780E09 +++$+++ I do not have an answer for your question and moved it into the [[Portal:Russia\/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board#Aleksey or Alexey? Aleksander or Alexander?]]. Lets see the discussion there  +++$+++ *I do not have an answer for your question and moved it into the [[Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board#Aleksey or Alexey? Aleksander or Alexander?]]. Lets see the discussion there [[User:Alex Bakharev|abakharev]] 22:43, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
540127 +++$+++ Alex Bakharev +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540125 +++$+++ 540125 +++$+++ 2006-02-14 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.139985960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the <nowiki>{{For<\/nowiki> templates on Tkachyovs, they help a lot. Maybe in this case we should use the patronimics in the titles and have Alexander Tkachyov as a disambig?  +++$+++ *Thanks for the <nowiki>{{For</nowiki> templates on Tkachyovs, they help a lot. Maybe in this case we should use the patronimics in the titles and have Alexander Tkachyov as a disambig? [[User:Alex Bakharev|abakharev]] 22:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

483237 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.190257500E09 +++$+++ As soon as the protection expired, YoSoyGuapo started messing around with it again. He's a very patient character.  +++$+++ As soon as the protection expired, YoSoyGuapo started messing around with it again. He's a very patient character. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 20:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
483238 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483237 +++$+++ 483237 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.190258040E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm done with that whole situation.  No one there seems to want to meet anywhere in the middle and I don't want to play anymore.  My guess is that YoSoyGuapo is going to be indefinitely blocked ''again'' and that will be the end of it.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Yeah, I'm done with that whole situation.  No one there seems to want to meet anywhere in the middle and I don't want to play anymore.  My guess is that YoSoyGuapo is going to be indefinitely blocked ''again'' and that will be the end of it.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 20:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

540130 +++$+++ Ezhiki +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-14 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.139987580E09 +++$+++ You are welcome.  I've just left [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Portal:Russia\/Russia-related_Wikipedia_notice_board&diff=39651935&oldid=39647629 another comment] you might be interested in.&mdash; +++$+++ You are welcome.  I've just left [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Russia/Russia-related_Wikipedia_notice_board&diff=39651935&oldid=39647629 another comment] you might be interested in.&mdash;[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis)]] 23:13, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
540131 +++$+++ Karnesky +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540130 +++$+++ 540130 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.140082920E09 +++$+++ It is on NASDAQ as \"FLWS.\" As a publicly traded company, you can find the requested info (733.74M USD revenue; 3000 employees). Finally, there has been a lot of non-trivial, non-ad press on the company. -- +++$+++ :It is on NASDAQ as "FLWS." As a publicly traded company, you can find the requested info (733.74M USD revenue; 3000 employees). Finally, there has been a lot of non-trivial, non-ad press on the company. --[[User:Karnesky|Karnesky]] 01:42, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

15843 +++$+++ Caspian blue +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15843 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-28 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.219911960E09 +++$+++ Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}.  This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  {{#if:|The discussion is about the topic [[:{{{1}}}]].}}  <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.-- +++$+++ Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}.  This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  {{#if:|The discussion is about the topic [[:{{{1}}}]].}}  <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.--[[User:Caspian blue|Caspian blue]] ([[User talk:Caspian blue|talk]]) 01:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
15844 +++$+++ Tenmei +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15843 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-02 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.220401140E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the good will which inspired your willingness to help me figure out how to improve the quality and effectiveness of my Wikipedia contributions. -- +++$+++ ::Thank you for the good will which inspired your willingness to help me figure out how to improve the quality and effectiveness of my Wikipedia contributions. --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 17:19, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

540132 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-23 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.140761520E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks. I can't believe the other guy is accusing ''me'' of chauvinism. -- +++$+++ Hey, thanks. I can't believe the other guy is accusing ''me'' of chauvinism. --[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoikhoi]] 22:12, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
540133 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540132 +++$+++ 540132 +++$+++ 2006-02-23 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.140762840E09 +++$+++ Hmmm. Not that I know of. You might want to check the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProjects]]. -- +++$+++ :Hmmm. Not that I know of. You might want to check the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProjects]]. --[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoikhoi]] 22:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
540134 +++$+++ Diyako +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540132 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-24 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.140772140E09 +++$+++ <span style=\"border: 2px solid #FF1111; padding: 1px;\"><b><font color=\"#00aa00\">[[User:Diyako|'''D''']]<\/font> +++$+++ :::<span style="border: 2px solid #FF1111; padding: 1px;"><b><font color="#00aa00">[[User:Diyako|'''D''']]</font>[[User:Diyako|iyako]] [[user_talk:Diyako|Talk]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Diyako&amp;action=edit&amp;section=new +]</b></span> 01:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

15845 +++$+++ Mr_Senseless +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-22 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.224732240E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, I'll give benefit of the doubt and swap the CSD template for a proposed deletion. ''' +++$+++ Fair enough, I'll give benefit of the doubt and swap the CSD template for a proposed deletion. '''[[User:Mr Senseless|Mister Senseless]]&trade;''' ([[User_talk:Mr Senseless|Speak]] - [[Special:Contributions/Mr_Senseless|Contributions]]) 20:24, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
15846 +++$+++ Mr_Senseless +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15845 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.224732900E09 +++$+++ I actually don't think the artist in question will survive a ProD or if nessacary an AfD, but I'm under the impression that the author is a new contributor and that he or she may not be familiar with the burden of proof required to establish notability. I left a note attempting to explain what a proposed deletion entatils. Hopefully this will give him or her more time to find and cite sources, if they're available. ''' +++$+++ ::I actually don't think the artist in question will survive a ProD or if nessacary an AfD, but I'm under the impression that the author is a new contributor and that he or she may not be familiar with the burden of proof required to establish notability. I left a note attempting to explain what a proposed deletion entatils. Hopefully this will give him or her more time to find and cite sources, if they're available. '''[[User:Mr Senseless|Mister Senseless]]&trade;''' ([[User_talk:Mr Senseless|Speak]] - [[Special:Contributions/Mr_Senseless|Contributions]]) 20:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

277992 +++$+++  +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-03 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.154617680E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 08:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
277993 +++$+++ Wikiwoohoo +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277992 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.154627940E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, I fixed it.  +++$+++ ::Don't worry, I fixed it. [[User:Wikiwoohoo|Wikiwoohoo]] 10:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
277994 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277992 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.154661180E09 +++$+++ Still doesn't have the real source, though. The source is the programme. Who captured the file is incidental.  +++$+++ :::Still doesn't have the real source, though. The source is the programme. Who captured the file is incidental. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 20:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
277995 +++$+++ Wikiwoohoo +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277992 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.154723880E09 +++$+++ It seems to be fixed now.  +++$+++ ::::It seems to be fixed now. [[User:Wikiwoohoo|Wikiwoohoo]] 13:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

518607 +++$+++ Pedrovsk +++$+++ Ckatz +++$+++ 518607 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-01 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.172785800E09 +++$+++ Will you excuse me if I'm saying rubbish, but I am new to Wikipedia and I'm not constantly here so I'm not 100% into the rules. I mainly follow what I see regularly in other articles and my concept of freedom (I don't think we want Wikipedia to be run by narrow-minded dictators who censor most things that slightly deviate from their perspective of how things should be, do we?).  +++$+++ Will you excuse me if I'm saying rubbish, but I am new to Wikipedia and I'm not constantly here so I'm not 100% into the rules. I mainly follow what I see regularly in other articles and my concept of freedom (I don't think we want Wikipedia to be run by narrow-minded dictators who censor most things that slightly deviate from their perspective of how things should be, do we?). [[User:Pedrovsk|Pedrovsk]] 13:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
518608 +++$+++ Pedrovsk +++$+++ Ckatz +++$+++ 518607 +++$+++ 518607 +++$+++ 2007-03-01 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.172800440E09 +++$+++ Ok, I understand. You might want to take a look at the [[Wii]] article by the way. It could be one of those who are not following the unofficial links rule, even though they are linking to pretty good gaming sites. Thanks. +++$+++ :Ok, I understand. You might want to take a look at the [[Wii]] article by the way. It could be one of those who are not following the unofficial links rule, even though they are linking to pretty good gaming sites. Thanks.[[User:Pedrovsk|Pedrovsk]] 17:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

15851 +++$+++ Jéské Couriano +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-02 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.233578100E09 +++$+++ |} -<font color=\"32CD32\">'' +++$+++ |} -<font color="32CD32">''[[User:Jéské Couriano|Jeremy]]''</font> <font color="4682B4"><sup>([[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|v^_^v]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|Dittobori]])</sup></font> 04:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
15852 +++$+++ Jéské Couriano +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15851 +++$+++ 15851 +++$+++ 2009-02-02 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.233578280E09 +++$+++ I apologize for the block.  I had lost track of whose contribs I was looking at when I hit the block button since I was looking at another tab.  Please accept my apologies. -<font color=\"32CD32\">'' +++$+++ :I apologize for the block.  I had lost track of whose contribs I was looking at when I hit the block button since I was looking at another tab.  Please accept my apologies. -<font color="32CD32">''[[User:Jéské Couriano|Jeremy]]''</font> <font color="4682B4"><sup>([[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|v^_^v]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|Dittobori]])</sup></font> 04:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
15853 +++$+++ Jéské Couriano +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15851 +++$+++ 15852 +++$+++ 2009-02-02 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.233578400E09 +++$+++ I've also undone the autoblock. -<font color=\"32CD32\">'' +++$+++ ::I've also undone the autoblock. -<font color="32CD32">''[[User:Jéské Couriano|Jeremy]]''</font> <font color="4682B4"><sup>([[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|v^_^v]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|Dittobori]])</sup></font> 04:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

277996 +++$+++ CPAScott +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277996 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-03 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.154660880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for creating this article, however I believe it is a Candidate for Speedy Deletion as there is no information that clearly distinguishes them as important or significant.  --  +++$+++ Thanks for creating this article, however I believe it is a Candidate for Speedy Deletion as there is no information that clearly distinguishes them as important or significant.  -- [[User:CPAScott|CPAScott]] 20:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
277997 +++$+++ GarryMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 277996 +++$+++ 277996 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.154661000E09 +++$+++ That's fine. Sorry to bother anyone with this. I just want the band to get noticed. I'm not in it, it's my cousin that is. :D -- +++$+++ :That's fine. Sorry to bother anyone with this. I just want the band to get noticed. I'm not in it, it's my cousin that is. :D --[[User:GarryMc|GarryMc]] 20:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

540143 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540143 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-02 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.143986100E09 +++$+++ Hi, it's nice to meet a fellow Californian here! I really need your help on the [[Adana]] page - [[User:TuzsuzDeliBekir]] has been [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Adana&diff=46511001&oldid=46509477removing several paragraphs], many of which you wrote. He says [[Talk:Adana#Khoi ?|here]] that they're about Antioch (Antakya), not Adana. Please join in on the discussion, it would be much appreciated. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Hi, it's nice to meet a fellow Californian here! I really need your help on the [[Adana]] page - [[User:TuzsuzDeliBekir]] has been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adana&diff=46511001&oldid=46509477removing several paragraphs], many of which you wrote. He says [[Talk:Adana#Khoi ?|here]] that they're about Antioch (Antakya), not Adana. Please join in on the discussion, it would be much appreciated. Thanks. --[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoikhoi]] 06:55, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
540144 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540143 +++$+++ 540143 +++$+++ 2006-04-04 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.144134120E09 +++$+++ Thanks a bunch, thank you also for all the hard work you do. :) If the user objects to the paragraphs again I'll let you know. -- +++$+++ :Thanks a bunch, thank you also for all the hard work you do. :) If the user objects to the paragraphs again I'll let you know. --[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoikhoi]] 00:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

540145 +++$+++ BL Lacertae +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540145 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-05 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.144231380E09 +++$+++ that makes more sense. its going to have to stay as a MEast-geo-stub tho rather than whatever country it might or might not be in (a shame - if it could be pinned down to yemen then we could use Yemen-geo-stub). <small><i><font color=\"#990000\"> +++$+++ that makes more sense. its going to have to stay as a MEast-geo-stub tho rather than whatever country it might or might not be in (a shame - if it could be pinned down to yemen then we could use Yemen-geo-stub). <small><i><font color="#990000">[[User:BL Lacertae|BL Lacertae]]</font> - <font color="#555555">[[User talk:BL Lacertae|kiss the lizard]]</font></i></small> 03:03, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
540146 +++$+++ BL Lacertae +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540145 +++$+++ 540145 +++$+++ 2006-04-06 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.144313160E09 +++$+++ if thats the case then AfricaE-geo-stub (East Africa) would be a better one (that covers everywhere from Ethiopia to Tanzania). thanks. <small><i><font color=\"#990000\"> +++$+++ :if thats the case then AfricaE-geo-stub (East Africa) would be a better one (that covers everywhere from Ethiopia to Tanzania). thanks. <small><i><font color="#990000">[[User:BL Lacertae|BL Lacertae]]</font> - <font color="#555555">[[User talk:BL Lacertae|kiss the lizard]]</font></i></small> 01:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

278003 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278003 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-05 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.154829060E09 +++$+++ Hello. You know you can just request a user name change? [[Wikipedia:Changing username]]. It's probably better for you.  +++$+++ Hello. You know you can just request a user name change? [[Wikipedia:Changing username]]. It's probably better for you. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 18:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
278004 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278003 +++$+++ 278003 +++$+++ 2006-08-05 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.154831340E09 +++$+++ LOL. I didn't think I could do that. Would you be able to delete GMc, and change GarryMc to GMc, or is that too complicated now?  +++$+++ :LOL. I didn't think I could do that. Would you be able to delete GMc, and change GarryMc to GMc, or is that too complicated now? [[User:GMc|GMc]] 19:29, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
278005 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278003 +++$+++ 278004 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 10:12:00 +++$+++ 1.154884320E09 +++$+++ Well I can't becuase I don't have the toys -- but if you list your name on that page a b'crat will be able to change it (or say it can't be done now).  +++$+++ ::Well I can't becuase I don't have the toys -- but if you list your name on that page a b'crat will be able to change it (or say it can't be done now). [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:12, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
278006 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278003 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 10:17:00 +++$+++ 1.154884620E09 +++$+++ I've listed it there for you -- we'll see what Essjay says.  +++$+++ ::::I've listed it there for you -- we'll see what Essjay says. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 10:17, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
278007 +++$+++ Essjay +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278003 +++$+++ 278003 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.154887260E09 +++$+++ Okay, this is not at all uncommon, and nothing we can't handle. Basically, since you've already created the GMc account, I'll have to rename it, then I can rename the old account to this. All I need is to have you log in as GMc and post \"Please rename this account to make way for renaming GarryMc\". You can post it here and I'll take care of the rest. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Okay, this is not at all uncommon, and nothing we can't handle. Basically, since you've already created the GMc account, I'll have to rename it, then I can rename the old account to this. All I need is to have you log in as GMc and post "Please rename this account to make way for renaming GarryMc". You can post it here and I'll take care of the rest. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Essjay|<font color="#7b68ee">'''Essjay'''</font>]] [[User talk:Essjay|<font color="#7b68ee">(<small>Talk</small>)</font>]]</span> 11:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

15861 +++$+++ Fiftytwo thirty +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15861 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-14 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.273898700E09 +++$+++ Is this supposed to say ''O''livia Poffenbarger? -- +++$+++ Is this supposed to say ''O''livia Poffenbarger? --[[User:Fiftytwo thirty|Fiftytwo thirty]] ([[User talk:Fiftytwo thirty|talk]]) 21:45, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
15862 +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15861 +++$+++ 15861 +++$+++ 2010-05-14 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.273899300E09 +++$+++ Her obituary in the Charleston Gazette gives her name as \"Olivia\"; it seems not unreasonable that that was her given name. I think the article should stay under \"Livia\", since that is what she is referred to as everywhere else. +++$+++ * Her obituary in the Charleston Gazette gives her name as "Olivia"; it seems not unreasonable that that was her given name. I think the article should stay under "Livia", since that is what she is referred to as everywhere else.[[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] ([[User talk:Brianyoumans#top|talk]]) 21:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
15863 +++$+++ Fiftytwo thirty +++$+++ Brianyoumans +++$+++ 15861 +++$+++ 15862 +++$+++ 2010-05-14 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.273900080E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'll add a few redirects. -- +++$+++ ::Okay, I'll add a few redirects. --[[User:Fiftytwo thirty|Fiftytwo thirty]] ([[User talk:Fiftytwo thirty|talk]]) 22:08, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

278008 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278008 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-06 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.154887920E09 +++$+++ Please rename this account to GMcUK to make way for renaming GarryMc to GMc. Thanks.  +++$+++ Please rename this account to GMcUK to make way for renaming GarryMc to GMc. Thanks. [[User:GMc|GMc]] 11:12, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
278009 +++$+++ Essjay +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278008 +++$+++ 278008 +++$+++ 2006-08-06 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.154891940E09 +++$+++ All done. Log out and log back in as GMc to make sure all your session data is reset. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ :All done. Log out and log back in as GMc to make sure all your session data is reset. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Essjay|<font color="#7b68ee">'''Essjay'''</font>]] [[User talk:Essjay|<font color="#7b68ee">(<small>Talk</small>)</font>]]</span> 12:19, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

395860 +++$+++ Calvin999 +++$+++ La goutte de pluie +++$+++ 395860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-17 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310969880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Calvin999|<font color ="blue" face= "Aharoni">'''''Calvin '''''</font>]]&bull; [[User talk:Calvin999|<sup><font color="orange">9</font><font color="green">9</font><font color="red">9</font></sup>]]  23:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
395861 +++$+++ Calvin999 +++$+++ La goutte de pluie +++$+++ 395860 +++$+++ 395860 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310970240E09 +++$+++ again  +++$+++ : again [[User:Calvin999|<font color ="blue" face= "Aharoni">'''''Calvin '''''</font>]]&bull; [[User talk:Calvin999|<sup><font color="orange">9</font><font color="green">9</font><font color="red">9</font></sup>]]  23:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
395862 +++$+++ Calvin999 +++$+++ La goutte de pluie +++$+++ 395860 +++$+++ 395861 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.310972580E09 +++$+++ And again. +++$+++ :: And again.[[User:Calvin999|<font color ="blue" face= "Aharoni">'''''Calvin '''''</font>]]&bull; [[User talk:Calvin999|<sup><font color="orange">9</font><font color="green">9</font><font color="red">9</font></sup>]]  00:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
395863 +++$+++ Calvin999 +++$+++ La goutte de pluie +++$+++ 395860 +++$+++ 395862 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.310973300E09 +++$+++ you know the drill.  +++$+++ ::: you know the drill. [[User:Calvin999|<font color ="blue" face= "Aharoni">'''''Calvin '''''</font>]]&bull; [[User talk:Calvin999|<sup><font color="orange">9</font><font color="green">9</font><font color="red">9</font></sup>]]  00:15, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

540154 +++$+++ Chaldean +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-28 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.146214320E09 +++$+++ oh and I think [http:\/\/www.ankawa.com\/forum\/index.php\/topic,30258.0.html this] new finding might interest you; a couple months ago they discoved art\/wall scripts in the Asyrian-Iraqi town of [[Baghdida]], that historian believe comes from the Byzantinian time, when Byzantine ruled that portion of the world.  +++$+++ oh and I think [http://www.ankawa.com/forum/index.php/topic,30258.0.html this] new finding might interest you; a couple months ago they discoved art/wall scripts in the Asyrian-Iraqi town of [[Baghdida]], that historian believe comes from the Byzantinian time, when Byzantine ruled that portion of the world. [[User:Chaldean|Chaldean]] 01:52, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
540155 +++$+++ Chaldean +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540154 +++$+++ 540154 +++$+++ 2006-04-28 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.146218760E09 +++$+++ oh wow, I just looked and I guess you already did that :)  +++$+++ : oh wow, I just looked and I guess you already did that :) [[User:Chaldean|Chaldean]] 03:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

278011 +++$+++ the wub +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-09 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.155107400E09 +++$+++ Please do not remove [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for deletion]] notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered [[Wikipedia:vandalism|vandalism]]. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may [[Wikipedia:Guide to deletion|comment]] at the respective page instead. Thank you. <!-- Template:Drmafd -->   +++$+++ Please do not remove [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for deletion]] notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered [[Wikipedia:vandalism|vandalism]]. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may [[Wikipedia:Guide to deletion|comment]] at the respective page instead. Thank you. <!-- Template:Drmafd -->  [[User:the wub|the wub]] [[User_talk:The wub|<font color="green">"?!"</font>]] 00:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
278012 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278011 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.155164580E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of programmes on ITV digital channels]]. Both articles are listed for deletion.  +++$+++ ::See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programmes on ITV digital channels]]. Both articles are listed for deletion. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

278013 +++$+++ Kiand +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-18 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.155933720E09 +++$+++ Oops, your edit must have gone through between me checking to see had anyone mentioned it and pressing edit. Didn't mean to duplicate content, sorry. -- +++$+++ Oops, your edit must have gone through between me checking to see had anyone mentioned it and pressing edit. Didn't mean to duplicate content, sorry. --[[User:Kiand|Kiand]] 13:42, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
278014 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278013 +++$+++ 278013 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.155940620E09 +++$+++ It's OK. It makes more sense having the info nearer the top.  +++$+++ :It's OK. It makes more sense having the info nearer the top. [[User:GMc|<font color="Teal"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="Teal"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 15:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

278015 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-18 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.155935760E09 +++$+++ Hi Garry. Regarding [[:Image:SMGhq.jpg]], could I ask you for more information to validate that you are the copyright holder. What camera was used? Why is this so small? Do you still have the original, larger file? I would like to think that considering your previous blocks and warnings you would not do something as silly as take a photograph from another website and cliam it as your own.  +++$+++ Hi Garry. Regarding [[:Image:SMGhq.jpg]], could I ask you for more information to validate that you are the copyright holder. What camera was used? Why is this so small? Do you still have the original, larger file? I would like to think that considering your previous blocks and warnings you would not do something as silly as take a photograph from another website and cliam it as your own. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 14:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
278016 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278015 +++$+++ 278015 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.155940620E09 +++$+++ It was taken on my old phone. I have learned from my previous mistakes of taking images from other sites. LOL  +++$+++ :It was taken on my old phone. I have learned from my previous mistakes of taking images from other sites. LOL [[User:GMc|<font color="Teal"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="Teal"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 15:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

576645 +++$+++ GoodDay +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-27 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.227841260E09 +++$+++ Hiya MONGO. The way I understand things: When an editor is blocked for breaching his\/her ''AE restrictions''; another administrator ''can't'' unblock (without discussin it first).  +++$+++ Hiya MONGO. The way I understand things: When an editor is blocked for breaching his/her ''AE restrictions''; another administrator ''can't'' unblock (without discussin it first). [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 19:01, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
576646 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576645 +++$+++ 576645 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.227841740E09 +++$+++ This matter is more complicated than that. I am a big fan that in most cases, blocks should only be overturned after a true consensus to do so is established. I will be elaborating more on this fiasco in more detail if and only if SlimVirgin wants me to do so.-- +++$+++ :This matter is more complicated than that. I am a big fan that in most cases, blocks should only be overturned after a true consensus to do so is established. I will be elaborating more on this fiasco in more detail if and only if SlimVirgin wants me to do so.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 19:09, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
576647 +++$+++ GoodDay +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576645 +++$+++ 576646 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.227842040E09 +++$+++ Them are the rules. Six-months will pass & SV will have her Administration duties restored.  +++$+++ ::Them are the rules. Six-months will pass & SV will have her Administration duties restored. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 19:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
576648 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576645 +++$+++ 576647 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.227842160E09 +++$+++ It's more complicated than that.-- +++$+++ :::It's more complicated than that.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 19:16, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
576649 +++$+++ GoodDay +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576645 +++$+++ 576648 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.227845520E09 +++$+++ For all we know, Arbcom might have a change of heart & restore her Administrative duties earlier. Time will tell, I suppose.  +++$+++ ::::For all we know, Arbcom might have a change of heart & restore her Administrative duties earlier. Time will tell, I suppose. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 20:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

439552 +++$+++ Scientizzle +++$+++ M1ss1ontomars2k4 +++$+++ 439552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-15 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.171531080E09 +++$+++ A mutation within the protein coding sequence isn't generally expected to affect the synthesis of said gene's mRNA, but can certainly affect [[gene translation]]. If one considers the term \"gene\" to encompass all of the important non-coding sequences associated with each proteins's DNA coding sequence (promoter regions, splice sites, polyadenylation sites), then the answer is most certainly ''yes''. --  +++$+++ A mutation within the protein coding sequence isn't generally expected to affect the synthesis of said gene's mRNA, but can certainly affect [[gene translation]]. If one considers the term "gene" to encompass all of the important non-coding sequences associated with each proteins's DNA coding sequence (promoter regions, splice sites, polyadenylation sites), then the answer is most certainly ''yes''. -- [[User:Scientizzle|Scientizzle]] 01:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
439553 +++$+++ M1ss1ontomars2k4 +++$+++ M1ss1ontomars2k4 +++$+++ 439552 +++$+++ 439552 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.173015480E09 +++$+++ According to my 6\/e Campbell, that stuff doesn't count as part of the gene, and our articles concur. Does that mean transcription would not be affected by a change in the genes? --[[User:M1ss1ontomars2k4|M1ss1ontom]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:M1ss1ontomars2k4\/Esperanza|a]]<\/font> +++$+++ :According to my 6/e Campbell, that stuff doesn't count as part of the gene, and our articles concur. Does that mean transcription would not be affected by a change in the genes? --[[User:M1ss1ontomars2k4|M1ss1ontom]]<font color="green">[[User:M1ss1ontomars2k4/Esperanza|a]]</font>[[User:M1ss1ontomars2k4|rs2k4]] <sup>([[User talk:M1ss1ontomars2k4|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/M1ss1ontomars2k4|C]] | [[Special:Emailuser/M1ss1ontomars2k4|@]])</sup> 05:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
439554 +++$+++ Scientizzle +++$+++ M1ss1ontomars2k4 +++$+++ 439552 +++$+++ 439553 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.173070680E09 +++$+++ Outside of the protein-coding sequence, altering an [[Transcription_%28genetics%29#Initiation|initiation site]], [[Transcription_%28genetics%29#Termination|termination sequence]], [[polyadenylation]] site or any number of regulatory, [[non-coding RNA]]s, could change mRNA expression of one or more genes. --  +++$+++ ::Outside of the protein-coding sequence, altering an [[Transcription_%28genetics%29#Initiation|initiation site]], [[Transcription_%28genetics%29#Termination|termination sequence]], [[polyadenylation]] site or any number of regulatory, [[non-coding RNA]]s, could change mRNA expression of one or more genes. -- [[User:Scientizzle|Scientizzle]] 20:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
439555 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ M1ss1ontomars2k4 +++$+++ 439552 +++$+++ 439552 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.173351900E09 +++$+++ Take a look now.  +++$+++ :Take a look now. [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Xiner|email]]) 03:05, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

278018 +++$+++ Keithgreer +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-24 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.156469580E09 +++$+++ You might want to take a look at the template, Mr [[User_talk:86.131.192.170|86.131.192.170]] I think has taken it a bit far, what do you think? &nbsp; +++$+++ You might want to take a look at the template, Mr [[User_talk:86.131.192.170|86.131.192.170]] I think has taken it a bit far, what do you think? &nbsp;[[User:Keithgreer|<span style="background-color:#6699FF"><font="center" color="#FFFFFF">&nbsp;<b>Keith</b>ology&nbsp;</font></span>]][[User talk:Keithgreer|<span style="background-color:green"><font ="center" color="#FFFFFF">&nbsp;<small>Talk!</small>&nbsp;</font></span>]] 18:33, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
278019 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278018 +++$+++ 278018 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.156476720E09 +++$+++ That is shocking!!! I don't understand these people. I'll revert it.  +++$+++ :That is shocking!!! I don't understand these people. I'll revert it. [[User:GMc|<font color="White"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="White"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 20:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
278020 +++$+++ Tghe-retford +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278018 +++$+++ 278019 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.156474620E09 +++$+++ I can understand the frustration with the template being constantly edited, but technically you have broken [[WP:3RR]]. I did place a 3RR warning on the anon user's talk page and by rights following Wikipedia policy I should do the same to you. If you both can come to a compromise on [[Template talk:ITV]], please do so, but edit warring is not the answer. -- +++$+++ ::I can understand the frustration with the template being constantly edited, but technically you have broken [[WP:3RR]]. I did place a 3RR warning on the anon user's talk page and by rights following Wikipedia policy I should do the same to you. If you both can come to a compromise on [[Template talk:ITV]], please do so, but edit warring is not the answer. --[[User:Tghe-retford|<b>tghe</b>retford]] <small>([[User talk:Tghe-retford|talk]])</small> 19:57, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
278021 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278018 +++$+++ 278020 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.156478520E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm sorry, but it can hardly stay like that. Don't you agree. It's not just me who is annoyed.  +++$+++ :::Well, I'm sorry, but it can hardly stay like that. Don't you agree. It's not just me who is annoyed. [[User:GMc|<font color="White"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="White"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 21:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
278022 +++$+++ Tghe-retford +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278018 +++$+++ 278021 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.156476960E09 +++$+++ Yep, I know a few other people were reverting the changes made by [[User_talk:86.131.192.170|86.131.192.170]] and to be honest, the template does seem a bit too long, but edit warring isn't the answer. I can't see any vandalism caused by the edits made 86.131.192.170 (not in the Wikipedia description of [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] anyway). Everyone should really have made comments on the [[Template talk:ITV|template talk page]]. -- +++$+++ ::::Yep, I know a few other people were reverting the changes made by [[User_talk:86.131.192.170|86.131.192.170]] and to be honest, the template does seem a bit too long, but edit warring isn't the answer. I can't see any vandalism caused by the edits made 86.131.192.170 (not in the Wikipedia description of [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] anyway). Everyone should really have made comments on the [[Template talk:ITV|template talk page]]. --[[User:Tghe-retford|<b>tghe</b>retford]] <small>([[User talk:Tghe-retford|talk]])</small> 20:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

483243 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483243 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-11 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.189504680E09 +++$+++ Hi, I know you are an admin and I just wanted to let you know that [[User talk:204.16.148.4|204.16.148.4]] did some serious vandalism to a page. Thanks. - +++$+++ Hi, I know you are an admin and I just wanted to let you know that [[User talk:204.16.148.4|204.16.148.4]] did some serious vandalism to a page. Thanks. -[[User:Jj137|jj137]]<sup>[[User talk:Jj137|Talk]]</sup> 02:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
483244 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483243 +++$+++ 483243 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.189505100E09 +++$+++ Looks like someone else blocked him\/her.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Looks like someone else blocked him/her.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
483245 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483243 +++$+++ 483243 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.189509720E09 +++$+++ I've left a warning on the page.  A range block is an option if it continues.  It's not that large of a range.  The talk page can also be semi-protected but hopefully the warning is sufficient.  \u2014 +++$+++ :I've left a warning on the page.  A range block is an option if it continues.  It's not that large of a range.  The talk page can also be semi-protected but hopefully the warning is sufficient.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 04:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

15878 +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-02 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.291334220E09 +++$+++ OK, now that somebody has explained that they do have legitimate concerns about the content of this article I'll give them the benefit of the doubt at present, I realise this is a BLP, but this sort of thing can be difficult to distinguish from vandalism.  You will see that I did appeal to however it was to explain their changes on the IP's talk page.  +++$+++ OK, now that somebody has explained that they do have legitimate concerns about the content of this article I'll give them the benefit of the doubt at present, I realise this is a BLP, but this sort of thing can be difficult to distinguish from vandalism.  You will see that I did appeal to however it was to explain their changes on the IP's talk page. [[User:PatGallacher|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher#top|talk]]) 15:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
15879 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15878 +++$+++ 15878 +++$+++ 2010-12-02 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.291334820E09 +++$+++ No worries, thanks for explaining. There is a pattern of similar additions emerging from the dynamic range that added it there, thanks for commenting.  +++$+++ :No worries, thanks for explaining. There is a pattern of similar additions emerging from the dynamic range that added it there, thanks for commenting. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 16:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
15880 +++$+++ Magog the Ogre +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15878 +++$+++ 15878 +++$+++ 2010-12-02 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.291334220E09 +++$+++ Well I'll unblock you if you agree to self-revert. The article is a bit of a mess so I apologize, I've chosen to be heavy-handed. And the edit didn't look dubious to me.  +++$+++ :Well I'll unblock you if you agree to self-revert. The article is a bit of a mess so I apologize, I've chosen to be heavy-handed. And the edit didn't look dubious to me. [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 15:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
15881 +++$+++ RolandR +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15878 +++$+++ 15880 +++$+++ 2010-12-02 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.291334760E09 +++$+++ This is interesting. I was about to reject the same dubious change using reviewer status, having previously, like Pat, made a revert on this article. His act preempted me, otherwise I might have been in the same situation. I think there is a degree of ambiguity\/unclarity about such edits, which needs to be resolved explicitly. The specific edit, by the way, is certainly dubious, rejecting as false the description of the pictures on Commons. <span style=\"font-family: Papyrus\"> +++$+++ ::This is interesting. I was about to reject the same dubious change using reviewer status, having previously, like Pat, made a revert on this article. His act preempted me, otherwise I might have been in the same situation. I think there is a degree of ambiguity/unclarity about such edits, which needs to be resolved explicitly. The specific edit, by the way, is certainly dubious, rejecting as false the description of the pictures on Commons. <span style="font-family: Papyrus">[[User:RolandR|RolandR]] ([[User talk:RolandR|talk]])</span> 16:06, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
15882 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15878 +++$+++ 15881 +++$+++ 2010-12-02 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.291335420E09 +++$+++ It is not a get out of a revert condition to claim you were acting as a reviewer, you would have a case if is was a unmitigated BLP violation or very clear vandalism, which this doesn't seem to be, best is if there is a restriction allow uninvolved users to review.  +++$+++ :::It is not a get out of a revert condition to claim you were acting as a reviewer, you would have a case if is was a unmitigated BLP violation or very clear vandalism, which this doesn't seem to be, best is if there is a restriction allow uninvolved users to review. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 16:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
15883 +++$+++ Timotheus Canens +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15878 +++$+++ 15882 +++$+++ 2010-12-02 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.291362060E09 +++$+++ Guys, you do realize that there's a clause that says \"Clear vandalism, or ''edits by anonymous IP editors'', may be reverted without penalty\" (emphasis mine), right? I'm prepared to unblock.  +++$+++ ::::Guys, you do realize that there's a clause that says "Clear vandalism, or ''edits by anonymous IP editors'', may be reverted without penalty" (emphasis mine), right? I'm prepared to unblock. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 23:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
15884 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15878 +++$+++ 15883 +++$+++ 2010-12-02 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.291362480E09 +++$+++ Ah yes, its there bold as brass on the template. Yes , clearly there was no violation and I support unblock.  +++$+++ :::::Ah yes, its there bold as brass on the template. Yes , clearly there was no violation and I support unblock. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 23:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
15885 +++$+++ Magog the Ogre +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15878 +++$+++ 15878 +++$+++ 2010-12-03 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.291363200E09 +++$+++ OK, I'll unblock. For future reference, everyone, you can always revert my decision when I'm not around if there's consensus like this; no need to stand on process. I totally missed that clause about IP edits; it's rather buried in the text. My apologies to Pat.  +++$+++ :OK, I'll unblock. For future reference, everyone, you can always revert my decision when I'm not around if there's consensus like this; no need to stand on process. I totally missed that clause about IP edits; it's rather buried in the text. My apologies to Pat. [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 00:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

540167 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-20 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.150862820E09 +++$+++ Voted. :) &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ Voted. :) &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 21:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
540168 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540167 +++$+++ 540167 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.150877400E09 +++$+++ Yeah, it is hot! Lol, no idea. :p I don't speak either language, but if you're looking for Armenians you might try Glendale. Sorry I couldn't help much. Adios. &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ :Yeah, it is hot! Lol, no idea. :p I don't speak either language, but if you're looking for Armenians you might try Glendale. Sorry I couldn't help much. Adios. &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 01:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
540169 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540167 +++$+++ 540168 +++$+++ 2006-06-24 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.151201940E09 +++$+++ Hahaha, from now on you can call me \"Kemal\". ;) &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ ::Hahaha, from now on you can call me "Kemal". ;) &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 19:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

278024 +++$+++  +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-30 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.156948380E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 07:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
278025 +++$+++ Keithgreer +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278024 +++$+++ 278024 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 09:01:00 +++$+++ 1.156953660E09 +++$+++ Hi, I have added a <nowiki>{{tv-logo}}<\/nowiki>, use this every time you upload a TV logo. You just need you to add a link to a source for the image so you can remove the <nowiki>{{nosource}}<\/nowiki> template, thanks. &nbsp; +++$+++ :Hi, I have added a <nowiki>{{tv-logo}}</nowiki>, use this every time you upload a TV logo. You just need you to add a link to a source for the image so you can remove the <nowiki>{{nosource}}</nowiki> template, thanks. &nbsp;[[User:Keithgreer|<span style="background-color:#6699FF"><font="center" color="#FFFFFF">&nbsp;<b>Keith</b>ology&nbsp;</font></span>]][[User talk:Keithgreer|<span style="background-color:green"><font ="center" color="#FFFFFF">&nbsp;<small>Talk!</small>&nbsp;</font></span>]] 09:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
278026 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278024 +++$+++ 278025 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.156981800E09 +++$+++ Could you delete that image, as I have uploaded a bigger version: [[:Image:ITVSportlogo.png]]  +++$+++ ::Could you delete that image, as I have uploaded a bigger version: [[:Image:ITVSportlogo.png]] [[User:GMc|<font color="White"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="White"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 16:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

278027 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-01 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.157172960E09 +++$+++ Hello, Garry. There is an image in the [[:Category:STV]]. Could you fix that, please. Fair use images are to be used in articles only. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hello, Garry. There is an image in the [[:Category:STV]]. Could you fix that, please. Fair use images are to be used in articles only. Thanks. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 21:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
278028 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278027 +++$+++ 278027 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.157177220E09 +++$+++ Do you mean the SMG logo? That is part of a template. Shall I remove the whole template?  +++$+++ :Do you mean the SMG logo? That is part of a template. Shall I remove the whole template? [[User:GMc|<font color="White"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="White"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 23:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
278029 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278027 +++$+++ 278028 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.157173740E09 +++$+++ It's up to you how you do it. If removing the template is the only way, then yes.  +++$+++ ::It's up to you how you do it. If removing the template is the only way, then yes. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
278030 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278027 +++$+++ 278029 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.157177400E09 +++$+++ No bother JPS<br> +++$+++ :::No bother JPS<br>[[User:GMc|<font color="White"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="White"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 23:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
278031 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278027 +++$+++ 278029 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.157173860E09 +++$+++ The best way might be to remove the logo from the template? I see it's alos in a couple of other categories.  +++$+++ :::The best way might be to remove the logo from the template? I see it's alos in a couple of other categories. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 22:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
278032 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278027 +++$+++ 278031 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.157177520E09 +++$+++ All removed :D<br> +++$+++ ::::All removed :D<br>[[User:GMc|<font color="White"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="White"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 23:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

540173 +++$+++ Dbiv +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-28 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.151546700E09 +++$+++ As a single admin I'm not prepared to unilaterally overturn Mackensen's decision. However, I have placed the matter at [[WP:DRV|Deletion Review]] where questioned deletions are subjected to checking. If you would like me to resurrect the last version of the articles before deletion in your user space, I can do that.  +++$+++ As a single admin I'm not prepared to unilaterally overturn Mackensen's decision. However, I have placed the matter at [[WP:DRV|Deletion Review]] where questioned deletions are subjected to checking. If you would like me to resurrect the last version of the articles before deletion in your user space, I can do that. [[User:Dbiv|David]] | [[User talk:Dbiv|Talk]] 19:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
540174 +++$+++ Pasquale +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540173 +++$+++ 540173 +++$+++ 2006-06-28 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.151548260E09 +++$+++ Carlos, thanks for your message. Please keep me posted.   +++$+++ :Carlos, thanks for your message. Please keep me posted.  [[User:Pasquale|Pasquale]] 19:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
540175 +++$+++ Dbiv +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540173 +++$+++ 540174 +++$+++ 2006-06-28 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.151548440E09 +++$+++ Any editor is welcome to participate at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\/Log\/2006 June 28#Names of cities in different languages|the Deletion Review]], not just admins.  +++$+++ ::Any editor is welcome to participate at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 June 28#Names of cities in different languages|the Deletion Review]], not just admins. [[User:Dbiv|David]] | [[User talk:Dbiv|Talk]] 19:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

278033 +++$+++ Basement12 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278033 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-02 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.157236680E09 +++$+++ Just wondered why you moved this article to MLB on Five (with a capital F), if you can back up your reasons for this fair enough, but if not I think it should be moved back as all the channels logos etc (see [http:\/\/www.five.tv the website]) use lower case f.  +++$+++ Just wondered why you moved this article to MLB on Five (with a capital F), if you can back up your reasons for this fair enough, but if not I think it should be moved back as all the channels logos etc (see [http://www.five.tv the website]) use lower case f. [[User:Basement12|Basement12]] 15:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
278034 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278033 +++$+++ 278033 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.157240700E09 +++$+++ They don't use the lowercase f on any ECPs anymore, and it's rumoured that the logos will change when the new channels launch.<br> +++$+++ :They don't use the lowercase f on any ECPs anymore, and it's rumoured that the logos will change when the new channels launch.<br>[[User:GMc|<font color="White"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="White"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 16:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

540178 +++$+++ Travelbird +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540178 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-10 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.152587820E09 +++$+++ At the moment I'm a bit confused as to what actually happend. I moved [[Dominick dunne]] to [[Dominick Dunne]] because of spelling, Normally there should not have been an article named [[Dominick Dunne]] before the move. When looking at the page histories I don't show up, yet the page move does show up on \"my contributions\". Mmm. But since it has been rectified, I guess we'll just put this down to a software glitch. Could you check the page again, to see if the current version is the one you want ?  +++$+++ At the moment I'm a bit confused as to what actually happend. I moved [[Dominick dunne]] to [[Dominick Dunne]] because of spelling, Normally there should not have been an article named [[Dominick Dunne]] before the move. When looking at the page histories I don't show up, yet the page move does show up on "my contributions". Mmm. But since it has been rectified, I guess we'll just put this down to a software glitch. Could you check the page again, to see if the current version is the one you want ? [[User:Travelbird|Travelbird]] 20:17, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
540179 +++$+++ Travelbird +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540178 +++$+++ 540178 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.152588000E09 +++$+++ I think I found out what happened. There are actually two pages now : one called [[Dominck Dunne]] and one called [[Dominick Dunne]]. Which one is the correct one ?  +++$+++ : I think I found out what happened. There are actually two pages now : one called [[Dominck Dunne]] and one called [[Dominick Dunne]]. Which one is the correct one ? [[User:Travelbird|Travelbird]] 20:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

15892 +++$+++ Ttonyb1 +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-02 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.294026840E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of [[:Savannah Phillips|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or \"db\", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Savannah Phillips|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these administrators]] to request that the administrator [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom -->  +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of [[:Savannah Phillips|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Savannah Phillips|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these administrators]] to request that the administrator [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 19:54, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
15893 +++$+++ Danbarnesdavies +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15892 +++$+++ 15892 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.294036500E09 +++$+++ '''On a related note''': What's your source for the child's name? I can't find one! &#10013;''' +++$+++ :'''On a related note''': What's your source for the child's name? I can't find one! &#10013;'''[[User:Danbarnesdavies|D]][[User talk:Danbarnesdavies|B]][[Special:Contributions/Danbarnesdavies|D]]''' 22:35, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
15894 +++$+++ The Oriffice +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15892 +++$+++ 15892 +++$+++ 2011-01-21 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.295655180E09 +++$+++ LOL Did you think [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Thomas_Sheridan&diff=406861595&oldid=406763307 this] was a vandal 'commenting' on Tommy's court performance?  +++$+++ :LOL Did you think [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thomas_Sheridan&diff=406861595&oldid=406763307 this] was a vandal 'commenting' on Tommy's court performance? [[User:The Oriffice|The Oriffice]] ([[User talk:The Oriffice|talk]]) 16:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

15895 +++$+++ Noisetier +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-16 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.295213760E09 +++$+++ Could you explain me in what 'Jewish settlement' is partisan ?  +++$+++ Could you explain me in what 'Jewish settlement' is partisan ? [[User:Noisetier|Noisetier]] ([[User talk:Noisetier|talk]]) 13:36, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
15896 +++$+++ Noisetier +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15895 +++$+++ 15895 +++$+++ 2011-01-16 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.295223660E09 +++$+++ Did you get my message ? I don't understand what you see as 'partisan' in 'Jewish settlement'.  +++$+++ :Did you get my message ? I don't understand what you see as 'partisan' in 'Jewish settlement'. [[User:Noisetier|Noisetier]] ([[User talk:Noisetier|talk]]) 16:21, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

15897 +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15897 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-21 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.295632320E09 +++$+++ It did look like vandalism, but if it was an honest mistake fair enough.  +++$+++ It did look like vandalism, but if it was an honest mistake fair enough. [[User:PatGallacher|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher#top|talk]]) 09:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
15898 +++$+++ Baldboris99 +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15897 +++$+++ 15897 +++$+++ 2011-01-21 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.295643060E09 +++$+++ Well it was, why would I vandalize an article when ive made 1,787 edits. By the looks over it you've upset a lot over people on here. I hope I don't come across you again.  +++$+++ :Well it was, why would I vandalize an article when ive made 1,787 edits. By the looks over it you've upset a lot over people on here. I hope I don't come across you again. [[User:Baldboris99|Baldboris99]] ([[User talk:Baldboris99|talk]]) 12:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

594104 +++$+++ Kade +++$+++ Sam Spade +++$+++ 594104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-12 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.152753540E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid I have to pick up sticks and leave. Check my userpage for more info, but thank you for being a fairly rational admin.  +++$+++ I'm afraid I have to pick up sticks and leave. Check my userpage for more info, but thank you for being a fairly rational admin. [[User:Kade|Kade]] 18:19, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
594105 +++$+++ Sam Spade +++$+++ Sam Spade +++$+++ 594104 +++$+++ 594104 +++$+++ 2006-07-14 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.152915480E09 +++$+++ Funny thing is I'm neither an admin nor an active wikipedian myself... No wonder this place is such a mess! Anyone with any sense departs as soon as they experience \"the cabal\".  +++$+++ :Funny thing is I'm neither an admin nor an active wikipedian myself... No wonder this place is such a mess! Anyone with any sense departs as soon as they experience "the cabal". [[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade]] 15:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

15900 +++$+++ Deacon of Pndapetzim +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15900 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-22 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.295687940E09 +++$+++ Pat, can I ask that the article William the Lion be moved back to its location. I will do this myself, but it is better that you do it. It was stable at that location. If you choose not to respect a <s>6<\/s>4 month name as stable it may work for your own POV in this particular case, but you'll find that the precedent undermines later positions you take AND creates instability in Wikipedia in general.  +++$+++ Pat, can I ask that the article William the Lion be moved back to its location. I will do this myself, but it is better that you do it. It was stable at that location. If you choose not to respect a <s>6</s>4 month name as stable it may work for your own POV in this particular case, but you'll find that the precedent undermines later positions you take AND creates instability in Wikipedia in general. [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 01:19, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
15901 +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15900 +++$+++ 15900 +++$+++ 2011-01-22 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.295689980E09 +++$+++ To my mind a move which was made without proper discussion around 6 months ago does not trump the most recent formal move discussion.  +++$+++ :To my mind a move which was made without proper discussion around 6 months ago does not trump the most recent formal move discussion. [[User:PatGallacher|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher#top|talk]]) 01:53, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
15902 +++$+++ Deacon of Pndapetzim +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15900 +++$+++ 15901 +++$+++ 2011-01-22 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.295691900E09 +++$+++ See [[WP:BRD]] and [[WP:SILENCE]]. The current name is the established now, having been established for well over the normal time. A RM three years ago only questionably close when we had different guidelines is irrelevant. You are experienced enough to know that once a page is at a location for 1 month or longer, it is generally recognized as the new default location. Transgressing this Wikipedia etiquette is short-sighted. Though it may benefit your position here, it won't benefit others later and will cause a break-down of a custom that helps neutralize article instability.  +++$+++ ::See [[WP:BRD]] and [[WP:SILENCE]]. The current name is the established now, having been established for well over the normal time. A RM three years ago only questionably close when we had different guidelines is irrelevant. You are experienced enough to know that once a page is at a location for 1 month or longer, it is generally recognized as the new default location. Transgressing this Wikipedia etiquette is short-sighted. Though it may benefit your position here, it won't benefit others later and will cause a break-down of a custom that helps neutralize article instability. [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 02:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
15903 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15900 +++$+++ 15902 +++$+++ 2011-01-23 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.295809380E09 +++$+++ I have re-moved the article to William the Lion and protected it for a week in the hope of preventing a move war. I realise this is the \"wrong\" version from you point of view but it is clear that the alternative is currently controversial and needs to go through WP:RM. Similar notes sent to others involved. Regards,  +++$+++ :::I have re-moved the article to William the Lion and protected it for a week in the hope of preventing a move war. I realise this is the "wrong" version from you point of view but it is clear that the alternative is currently controversial and needs to go through WP:RM. Similar notes sent to others involved. Regards, [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 11:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

540191 +++$+++ Blainster +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540191 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-29 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.154194440E09 +++$+++ They are trying to delete [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion\/Log\/2006_July_20#Entertainers_by_age_upon_death this group] of categories for the 4th time. Closing soon.  -- +++$+++ They are trying to delete [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_July_20#Entertainers_by_age_upon_death this group] of categories for the 4th time. Closing soon.  --[[User:Blainster|Blainster]] 10:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
540192 +++$+++ CQ +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540191 +++$+++ 540191 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.154339580E09 +++$+++ Nevermind. [[Context of community]] is now a redirect to [[context]]. Sorry for any confusion.  +++$+++ :Nevermind. [[Context of community]] is now a redirect to [[context]]. Sorry for any confusion. [[User:CQ|CQ]] 02:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

15905 +++$+++ AnnekeBart +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15905 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-24 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.295857680E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you reverted my redirect to [[Dedumose II]]. I just wanted to point out that these people are one and the same. The spelling Dusimose is outdated and the article did not include the latest research by scholars such as Ryholt and Bennett. But I see your point. I did a quick search and Dudimose is referred to in other articles (with mistakes I think?) Not sure where to go to discuss how to clean this up. -- +++$+++ I noticed that you reverted my redirect to [[Dedumose II]]. I just wanted to point out that these people are one and the same. The spelling Dusimose is outdated and the article did not include the latest research by scholars such as Ryholt and Bennett. But I see your point. I did a quick search and Dudimose is referred to in other articles (with mistakes I think?) Not sure where to go to discuss how to clean this up. --[[User:AnnekeBart|AnnekeBart]] ([[User talk:AnnekeBart|talk]]) 00:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
15906 +++$+++ AnnekeBart +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15905 +++$+++ 15905 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.295860080E09 +++$+++ After looking at it again, I still think the redirect is the way to go. The king is equated with Dedumose II. The original Dudimose article is not well written, and not well referenced. The only source mentioned is Rohl, which is considered fringe. The information about Dedumose's identfication with Tutimaios is mentioned in the Dedumose II article. And this is not generally accepted by Egyptologists. I honestly see no justification keeping the old article around. -- +++$+++ : After looking at it again, I still think the redirect is the way to go. The king is equated with Dedumose II. The original Dudimose article is not well written, and not well referenced. The only source mentioned is Rohl, which is considered fringe. The information about Dedumose's identfication with Tutimaios is mentioned in the Dedumose II article. And this is not generally accepted by Egyptologists. I honestly see no justification keeping the old article around. --[[User:AnnekeBart|AnnekeBart]] ([[User talk:AnnekeBart|talk]]) 01:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

15907 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15907 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.296157920E09 +++$+++ You just participated in an edit war without using the talk page with an edit summary saying \"it looks like\" even though it really is  objectionable. Portions of it might be acceptable but you are now part of the problem. +++$+++ You just participated in an edit war without using the talk page with an edit summary saying "it looks like" even though it really is  objectionable. Portions of it might be acceptable but you are now part of the problem.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 11:52, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
15908 +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15907 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.296158220E09 +++$+++ The previous edit which I reverted did not make any reference to the talk page either.  +++$+++ ::The previous edit which I reverted did not make any reference to the talk page either. [[User:PatGallacher|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher#top|talk]]) 11:57, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
15909 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15907 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.296158700E09 +++$+++ So? There actually is a discussion. Just say you made a mistake and we can forget about it. +++$+++ :::So? There actually is a discussion. Just say you made a mistake and we can forget about it.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 12:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
15910 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15907 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.296482460E09 +++$+++ Are you going out of your way to be disruptive and\/or upset that someone brought up your mistake? There is a talk page that has been used by other editors besides you and the now blocked editor. Further reverts on your part will lead to a request to have you blocked from the topic area since you are making the situation worse. You also reverted something that has support on the talk page so learn to use it. +++$+++ :::Are you going out of your way to be disruptive and/or upset that someone brought up your mistake? There is a talk page that has been used by other editors besides you and the now blocked editor. Further reverts on your part will lead to a request to have you blocked from the topic area since you are making the situation worse. You also reverted something that has support on the talk page so learn to use it.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 06:01, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
15911 +++$+++ Cptnono +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15907 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.296483180E09 +++$+++ Follow-up: I planned on filing an ANIt o get you notified of the arbitration case. You are already aware of it from the block situation awhile back. No more shenanigans. If you are going to refuse to use the talk page and make reverts that support edits from a disruptive editor then I will be glad to see you gone from the topic. Please just use the talk page since most established editors are able to figure it out. +++$+++ :::Follow-up: I planned on filing an ANIt o get you notified of the arbitration case. You are already aware of it from the block situation awhile back. No more shenanigans. If you are going to refuse to use the talk page and make reverts that support edits from a disruptive editor then I will be glad to see you gone from the topic. Please just use the talk page since most established editors are able to figure it out.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 06:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

540196 +++$+++ Morton devonshire +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-07 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.155006360E09 +++$+++ Yes, here's the citation that says the List of Banned Songs is an Urban Legend.  See Snopes [http:\/\/www.snopes.com\/rumors\/radio.htm]   +++$+++ Yes, here's the citation that says the List of Banned Songs is an Urban Legend.  See Snopes [http://www.snopes.com/rumors/radio.htm]  [[User:Morton devonshire|Morton devonshire]] 20:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
540197 +++$+++ Morton devonshire +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540196 +++$+++ 540196 +++$+++ 2006-08-07 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.155019260E09 +++$+++ Two problems:  (1) the list is frequently edited by the article's gatekeeper, LGagnon, to insist that a ban really did exist (and he can't be convinced otherwise); and (2) besides the Snopes article itself, there is nothing to verify that Clearchannel actually had such a list, so how can we know what was supposed to be on the list?  The only references to the list in the media seem to be to the urban legend that Clear Channel actually banned the songs.  The net result is that the article lends credence to the notion that Clear Channel actually banned these songs, and it didn't.  The better result is to delete all mention of Clear Channel in the article, or just to delete the article entirely.   +++$+++ :Two problems:  (1) the list is frequently edited by the article's gatekeeper, LGagnon, to insist that a ban really did exist (and he can't be convinced otherwise); and (2) besides the Snopes article itself, there is nothing to verify that Clearchannel actually had such a list, so how can we know what was supposed to be on the list?  The only references to the list in the media seem to be to the urban legend that Clear Channel actually banned the songs.  The net result is that the article lends credence to the notion that Clear Channel actually banned these songs, and it didn't.  The better result is to delete all mention of Clear Channel in the article, or just to delete the article entirely.  [[User:Morton devonshire|Morton devonshire]] 23:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

278055 +++$+++ Glen S +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278055 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-16 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.166295720E09 +++$+++ If I may be so bold; What are you doing?  +++$+++ If I may be so bold; What are you doing? [[User talk:Glen S|<span style="border:1px solid #000;padding:1px;background:yellow;"><font style="color:yellow;background:#000;">&nbsp;Glen&nbsp;</font></span>]] 11:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
278056 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278055 +++$+++ 278055 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.163703900E09 +++$+++ Well, as the programmes don't have proper articles, and they all air on [[CITV]], I thought it would be OK if I redirected them... +++$+++ :Well, as the programmes don't have proper articles, and they all air on [[CITV]], I thought it would be OK if I redirected them...[[User:GMc|<font color="Teal"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="Teal"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 11:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
278057 +++$+++ Glen S +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278055 +++$+++ 278056 +++$+++ 2006-12-16 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.166296020E09 +++$+++ Actually the redirects are really appropriate at all. For example; Take [[Whizzywig]], if I were looking for info on it, the redirect is literally useless - the article doesnt make mention of it even once. Please dont make anymore  +++$+++ ::Actually the redirects are really appropriate at all. For example; Take [[Whizzywig]], if I were looking for info on it, the redirect is literally useless - the article doesnt make mention of it even once. Please dont make anymore [[User talk:Glen S|<span style="border:1px solid #000;padding:1px;background:yellow;"><font style="color:yellow;background:#000;">&nbsp;Glen&nbsp;</font></span>]] 11:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

540200 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540200 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-03 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.157283000E09 +++$+++ One more thing, the [[Tarsus (city)]] article says, \"is a city in [[Cilicia Prima]]\". Shouldn't it mention [[\xc7ukurova]] in the intro? Thanks in advance. &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ One more thing, the [[Tarsus (city)]] article says, "is a city in [[Cilicia Prima]]". Shouldn't it mention [[Çukurova]] in the intro? Thanks in advance. &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 04:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
540201 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540200 +++$+++ 540200 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.157420460E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see what you mean, that makes a lot of sense. BTW, I just noticed that we have two articles about the same city: [[Charax (Tigris)]] (created by you) and [[Charax Spasinu]] (created by [[User:John Hill|John Hill]]). Which one do you think should be merged? &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ :Ah, I see what you mean, that makes a lot of sense. BTW, I just noticed that we have two articles about the same city: [[Charax (Tigris)]] (created by you) and [[Charax Spasinu]] (created by [[User:John Hill|John Hill]]). Which one do you think should be merged? &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 18:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
540202 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540200 +++$+++ 540201 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.157456760E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks! (to be honest, I will probably never look at those two pages again) ;-) &mdash;<span style=\"font-family:Palatino Linotype\"> +++$+++ ::Ok, thanks! (to be honest, I will probably never look at those two pages again) ;-) &mdash;<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Khoikhoi|<font color="">Khoikhoi</font>]]</span> 04:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

278061 +++$+++ Pit-yacker +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-16 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.166341020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Pit-yacker|Pit-yacker]] 23:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
278062 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278061 +++$+++ 278061 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.163752200E09 +++$+++ Well, I don't have that much to do with [[ITV Network Continuity Announcers]], I only moved the content from [[ITV1 Network Continuity Announcers]] to that page. I personally think it should be deleted, as it doesn't have much point to it. I also think ITV pages need a clean up, but I think the ITV1 article should stay. +++$+++ :Well, I don't have that much to do with [[ITV Network Continuity Announcers]], I only moved the content from [[ITV1 Network Continuity Announcers]] to that page. I personally think it should be deleted, as it doesn't have much point to it. I also think ITV pages need a clean up, but I think the ITV1 article should stay.[[User:GMc|<font color="#0099ff"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="#0099ff"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 00:30, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

540208 +++$+++ Kf4bdy +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540208 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-05 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.160106540E09 +++$+++ You comment on the AfD of [[The Ancient Apostolic Communion]] article was uncalled for and a personal attack of my church and my religion. -- +++$+++ You comment on the AfD of [[The Ancient Apostolic Communion]] article was uncalled for and a personal attack of my church and my religion. --[[User:Kf4bdy|<font color="red"><b><i>Kf4bdy</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Kf4bdy|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Kf4bdy|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 20:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
540209 +++$+++ Kf4bdy +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540208 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-05 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.160107080E09 +++$+++ You are so right! I am such a horrible person. Please forgive my intrusion into your Wikipedia. -- +++$+++ ::You are so right! I am such a horrible person. Please forgive my intrusion into your Wikipedia. --[[User:Kf4bdy|<font color="red"><b><i>Kf4bdy</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Kf4bdy|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Kf4bdy|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 20:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
540210 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540208 +++$+++ 540208 +++$+++ 2006-10-05 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.160107200E09 +++$+++ '''You're excused; say three Hail Marys and five Our Fathers and go and sin no more!'''.  +++$+++ *'''You're excused; say three Hail Marys and five Our Fathers and go and sin no more!'''. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 21:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

278065 +++$+++ JoshHolloway +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278065 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-21 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.166765400E09 +++$+++ I reverted your edit to [[The Bill]] ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=The_Bill&diff=95789608&oldid=95138887 link]). The duration is approximately 45 minutes, however ITV and some other stations run adverts to fill it to one hour. However, it is only 45 minutes. '''<span style=\"background-color: black; color: white;\"> +++$+++ I reverted your edit to [[The Bill]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Bill&diff=95789608&oldid=95138887 link]). The duration is approximately 45 minutes, however ITV and some other stations run adverts to fill it to one hour. However, it is only 45 minutes. '''<span style="background-color: black; color: white;">[[User:JoshHolloway|Josh]]</span><span style="background-color: black;color: white;">Holloway'''</span> 21:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
278066 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278065 +++$+++ 278065 +++$+++ 2006-12-21 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.166765700E09 +++$+++ Maybe you should mention that the run time is 45 minutes, excluding adverts?<br> +++$+++ :Maybe you should mention that the run time is 45 minutes, excluding adverts?<br>[[User:GMc|<font color="#0099ff"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="#0099ff"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 21:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
278067 +++$+++ JoshHolloway +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278065 +++$+++ 278066 +++$+++ 2006-12-21 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.166766600E09 +++$+++ I'll add a little something. Merry Christmas. '''<span style=\"background-color: black; color: white;\"> +++$+++ ::I'll add a little something. Merry Christmas. '''<span style="background-color: black; color: white;">[[User:JoshHolloway|Josh]]</span><span style="background-color: black;color: white;">Holloway'''</span> 21:50, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
278068 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278065 +++$+++ 278067 +++$+++ 2006-12-21 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.166766900E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much. Merry Christmas to you too.<br> +++$+++ :::Thanks very much. Merry Christmas to you too.<br>[[User:GMc|<font color="#0099ff"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="#0099ff"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 21:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

15923 +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-11 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.299832980E09 +++$+++ As far as I am aware these are the only 2 parodies of this incident. do you know of any more?  So there is a serious connection between them.  It might be different if we were trying to list all the parodies of something which has been parodied several times.  Also, in context the killing of Grace Archer was important in the history of British popular culture, although now only half-remembered.  +++$+++ As far as I am aware these are the only 2 parodies of this incident. do you know of any more?  So there is a serious connection between them.  It might be different if we were trying to list all the parodies of something which has been parodied several times.  Also, in context the killing of Grace Archer was important in the history of British popular culture, although now only half-remembered. [[User:PatGallacher|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher#top|talk]]) 00:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
15924 +++$+++ Rodhullandemu +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15923 +++$+++ 15923 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.299834180E09 +++$+++ I take your point but I'm not convinced that [[The Bowmans]] belongs in '''this''' article, since it surely is more closely connected with [[The Archers]] itself, and that is the linking problem. Fair enough to link it from The Archers, but here, I see it as being off-topic. If there were more examples that I could point to right now, there would be scope to have an article in its own right, but with only a handful at best, I think they should descend topically from \"The Archers\" and not cross unnecessary boundaries. But then, what is my opinion worth any more?  +++$+++ :I take your point but I'm not convinced that [[The Bowmans]] belongs in '''this''' article, since it surely is more closely connected with [[The Archers]] itself, and that is the linking problem. Fair enough to link it from The Archers, but here, I see it as being off-topic. If there were more examples that I could point to right now, there would be scope to have an article in its own right, but with only a handful at best, I think they should descend topically from "The Archers" and not cross unnecessary boundaries. But then, what is my opinion worth any more? [[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 01:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

15925 +++$+++ Maher-shalal-hashbaz +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-21 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.300773540E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion\/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Maher-shalal-hashbaz|Maher-shalal-hashbaz]] ([[User talk:Maher-shalal-hashbaz|talk]]) 22:59, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
15926 +++$+++ Tofutwitch11 +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15925 +++$+++ 15925 +++$+++ 2011-03-24 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.301012460E09 +++$+++ Just a note, it might have been easier to just explain to him what he did and why instead of templating him. [[WP:DTR|This is a very useful essay.]]  +++$+++ :Just a note, it might have been easier to just explain to him what he did and why instead of templating him. [[WP:DTR|This is a very useful essay.]] [[User:Tofutwitch11|<span style='font-family: "Arial Black"; color:Teal'><big>T</big><small>ofutwitch11</small></span>]]''' <sup><small>[[User talk:Tofutwitch11|<font color="Orange">(T<small>ALK</small>)</font>]]</small></sup>''' 17:21, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

540218 +++$+++ N Shar +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-20 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.172033820E09 +++$+++ You are over-analyzing the phrase \"delete and salt.\" '''Salt''' refers to [[WP:SALT]], a way to keep a deleted page from being re-created. It has nothing to do with [[Sodom and Gomorrah]]. -- +++$+++ You are over-analyzing the phrase "delete and salt." '''Salt''' refers to [[WP:SALT]], a way to keep a deleted page from being re-created. It has nothing to do with [[Sodom and Gomorrah]]. --[[User:N Shar|N Shar]] 20:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
540219 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540218 +++$+++ 540218 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.172034120E09 +++$+++ Yes, you made a bit of a mistake there. However, would you like to join [[Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies|WikiProject LGBT studies]]? I think you would be interested.  +++$+++ :Yes, you made a bit of a mistake there. However, would you like to join [[Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies|WikiProject LGBT studies]]? I think you would be interested. [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 21:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
540220 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540218 +++$+++ 540219 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.172034540E09 +++$+++ No, \"delete and salt\" and \"kill with fire\" are standard expressions used in AfDs.  {User|Essjay}}, who is gay, regularly uses \"kill with fire\" when he votes. I do not believe there is homophobiain any of that AfD - even the nominator most recently created an article on someone who is gay.  +++$+++ ::No, "delete and salt" and "kill with fire" are standard expressions used in AfDs.  {User|Essjay}}, who is gay, regularly uses "kill with fire" when he votes. I do not believe there is homophobiain any of that AfD - even the nominator most recently created an article on someone who is gay. [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 21:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
540221 +++$+++ N Shar +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540218 +++$+++ 540219 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.172034720E09 +++$+++ For evidence that '''delete and salt''' isn't anti-gay propaganda\/hate speech, see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of palindromic phrases in English]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Deaths in Final Destination 3]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Denny Klein]], and my own contribution to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Nepassa]]. -- +++$+++ :*For evidence that '''delete and salt''' isn't anti-gay propaganda/hate speech, see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of palindromic phrases in English]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deaths in Final Destination 3]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denny Klein]], and my own contribution to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nepassa]]. --[[User:N Shar|N Shar]] 21:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
540222 +++$+++ Dev920 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540218 +++$+++ 540221 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.172035380E09 +++$+++ It's nothing to do with being sensitive or not (but for the record, no I don't go around trying to be offended by everything a straight person says) - I have been involved with AfDs for over eight months, across several Wikimedia projects, and \"kill with fire\" is a standard expression used by many people, including homosexuals, and it is not a anti-gay expression, unless you think people are just being homophobic on every AfD they vote on. Which is silly.  +++$+++ :::It's nothing to do with being sensitive or not (but for the record, no I don't go around trying to be offended by everything a straight person says) - I have been involved with AfDs for over eight months, across several Wikimedia projects, and "kill with fire" is a standard expression used by many people, including homosexuals, and it is not a anti-gay expression, unless you think people are just being homophobic on every AfD they vote on. Which is silly. [[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 21:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

278076 +++$+++ Trident13 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278076 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-29 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.170064200E09 +++$+++ Your captured image of Sian Lloyd at [[:Image:ITVSi\xe2nLloyd.jpg]] has been tagged for removal. I don't really understand why, as you have tagged it as self caputure, and now the editor who removed it from her biography has tagged it as unused! Best Rgds, -  +++$+++ Your captured image of Sian Lloyd at [[:Image:ITVSiânLloyd.jpg]] has been tagged for removal. I don't really understand why, as you have tagged it as self caputure, and now the editor who removed it from her biography has tagged it as unused! Best Rgds, - [[User:Trident13|Trident13]] 01:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
278077 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278076 +++$+++ 278076 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.170116040E09 +++$+++ # Images of living subjects are usually not fair use because a free equivalent could be acquired.  +++$+++ :# Images of living subjects are usually not fair use because a free equivalent could be acquired. [[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
278078 +++$+++ The JPS +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278076 +++$+++ 278076 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.170116040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:The JPS|<font color="Purple">The <b>JP</b>S</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The JPS|'''<font color="Purple"><b>talk</b> to me</font>''']]</sup> 16:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

488929 +++$+++ Paultyng +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 488929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-19 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.184885820E09 +++$+++ It seems there is some error in the seconds somewhere.  They have explicit lat \/ long columns in the file I downloaded, so I was just using that. If you take a look at this [http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?f=d&hl=en&geocode=&saddr=33%C2%B0+27'+50.4%22,+-86%C2%B0+49'+6.83%22&daddr=%2B33%C2%B0+27'+56.66%22,+-86%C2%B0+49'+9.02%22+(33.465738,+-86.819173)+to:430+COLUMBIANA+RD%09BIRMINGHAM%09AL&mrcr=1&mra=pi&sll=33.464935,-86.818731&sspn=0.001696,0.002816&ie=UTF8&ll=33.464841,-86.818171&spn=0.003392,0.005633&t=h&z=18&om=1 link] I plotted your numbers, my numbers and what google though based on the address, so I'm not sure its a huge deal, just wondering about your thoughts.  +++$+++ It seems there is some error in the seconds somewhere.  They have explicit lat / long columns in the file I downloaded, so I was just using that. If you take a look at this [http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&hl=en&geocode=&saddr=33%C2%B0+27'+50.4%22,+-86%C2%B0+49'+6.83%22&daddr=%2B33%C2%B0+27'+56.66%22,+-86%C2%B0+49'+9.02%22+(33.465738,+-86.819173)+to:430+COLUMBIANA+RD%09BIRMINGHAM%09AL&mrcr=1&mra=pi&sll=33.464935,-86.818731&sspn=0.001696,0.002816&ie=UTF8&ll=33.464841,-86.818171&spn=0.003392,0.005633&t=h&z=18&om=1 link] I plotted your numbers, my numbers and what google though based on the address, so I'm not sure its a huge deal, just wondering about your thoughts. [[User:Paultyng|pw]] 15:57, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
488930 +++$+++ Paultyng +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 488929 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.184889240E09 +++$+++ I started looking through some that I knew the location (so I could verify via satellite) and I found some where our numbers matched and they had the right location, so it seems like everything is fine, just some minor discrepencies on some records, I will make a note of that in an HTML comment when i put the data in the infobox.  +++$+++ ::I started looking through some that I knew the location (so I could verify via satellite) and I found some where our numbers matched and they had the right location, so it seems like everything is fine, just some minor discrepencies on some records, I will make a note of that in an HTML comment when i put the data in the infobox. [[User:Paultyng|pw]] 16:54, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
488931 +++$+++ Paultyng +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 488929 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.184894700E09 +++$+++ I posted a question at [[Template talk:Infobox nrhp#Template:Location map vs Superimpose]], maybe you have an answer.  It seems like it would make these stubs look a lot better since I could have locator images generated from their coords instead of trying to figure out x\/y.  +++$+++ :::I posted a question at [[Template talk:Infobox nrhp#Template:Location map vs Superimpose]], maybe you have an answer.  It seems like it would make these stubs look a lot better since I could have locator images generated from their coords instead of trying to figure out x/y. [[User:Paultyng|pw]] 18:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

540223 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-21 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.172121060E09 +++$+++ Hi Carlos, you might want to take a look at [[WP:GREEK]]. \"Pisistratus\" is the preferring spelling on enwiki. Personally, I'd rather spell it \"Peisistratos\", but that's not our standard.  +++$+++ Hi Carlos, you might want to take a look at [[WP:GREEK]]. "Pisistratus" is the preferring spelling on enwiki. Personally, I'd rather spell it "Peisistratos", but that's not our standard. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 21:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
540224 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540223 +++$+++ 540223 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.172121780E09 +++$+++ I do think, however, that the Athenian tyrant is by far the most famous Peisistratos, and he should be the main article at that name--the disambig page can be at [[Peistratus (disambiguation)]].  +++$+++ :I do think, however, that the Athenian tyrant is by far the most famous Peisistratos, and he should be the main article at that name--the disambig page can be at [[Peistratus (disambiguation)]]. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 21:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
540225 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540223 +++$+++ 540223 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.172124480E09 +++$+++ Carlos, [[WP:GREEK]] actually specifies that names\/nouns ending in -{{polytonic|\u03bf\u03c2}} get transliterated as \"-us\"--see the section \"Equivalence changes\".  +++$+++ :Carlos, [[WP:GREEK]] actually specifies that names/nouns ending in -{{polytonic|ος}} get transliterated as "-us"--see the section "Equivalence changes". [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 22:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
540226 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540223 +++$+++ 540223 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.172125320E09 +++$+++ Carlos, the only reason I made these comments is because I see you're expending a considerable amount of time and effort fixing redirects, and it's quite likely [[Peisistratos (Athens)]] is going to be moved. I acknowledge the Google Scholar results, but you get a different picture with regular Google, and I've seen enough RM discussions that I think I know which set will win out. I'm not trying to argue with you; if I were king of Greek transliteration, [[Heraclitus]] would be at [[Herakleitos]] and [[Cypria]] would be at [[Kypria]]--just look at my username! But I think it's very likely that [[Peisistratos (Athens)]] is going to be moved, both because of the spelling issue and because he's the most prominent figure of that name. I'm just telling you all of this because fixing redirects is enough of a pain, but doing it twice is even worse...  +++$+++ :Carlos, the only reason I made these comments is because I see you're expending a considerable amount of time and effort fixing redirects, and it's quite likely [[Peisistratos (Athens)]] is going to be moved. I acknowledge the Google Scholar results, but you get a different picture with regular Google, and I've seen enough RM discussions that I think I know which set will win out. I'm not trying to argue with you; if I were king of Greek transliteration, [[Heraclitus]] would be at [[Herakleitos]] and [[Cypria]] would be at [[Kypria]]--just look at my username! But I think it's very likely that [[Peisistratos (Athens)]] is going to be moved, both because of the spelling issue and because he's the most prominent figure of that name. I'm just telling you all of this because fixing redirects is enough of a pain, but doing it twice is even worse... [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 22:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

540227 +++$+++ Jixavius +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540227 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.172263380E09 +++$+++ See you [[Talk:Jihad_%28disambiguation%29|there]]! ;-) Hasta pronto... ----<span style=\"color:blue\">''' +++$+++ See you [[Talk:Jihad_%28disambiguation%29|there]]! ;-) Hasta pronto... ----<span style="color:blue">'''[[User:Jixavius|Jixavius]] <sup>''[[User talk:Jixavius|@]]'' '''</sup></span> 12:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
540228 +++$+++ Jixavius +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540227 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.172285940E09 +++$+++ I answered on my [[User talk:Jixavius|talk page]]. Thanks Carlos. --<span style=\"color:blue\">''' +++$+++ ::I answered on my [[User talk:Jixavius|talk page]]. Thanks Carlos. --<span style="color:blue">'''[[User:Jixavius|Jixavius]] <sup>''[[User talk:Jixavius|@]]'' '''</sup></span> 18:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

540229 +++$+++ Itaqallah +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540229 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-03 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.172914080E09 +++$+++ i disagree with your interpretation of WP:BLP, it clearly refers to information that may be 'contentious', or disputed. do you really contend that listing people such as [[Malcom X]] and [[Martin Lings]] are converts? i will endeavour to source them, nonetheless. you have also overlooked one rather important thing: a lot of the people you removed are ''deceased'' and as such do not fall under WP:BLP. please could you restore them? thank you.  +++$+++ i disagree with your interpretation of WP:BLP, it clearly refers to information that may be 'contentious', or disputed. do you really contend that listing people such as [[Malcom X]] and [[Martin Lings]] are converts? i will endeavour to source them, nonetheless. you have also overlooked one rather important thing: a lot of the people you removed are ''deceased'' and as such do not fall under WP:BLP. please could you restore them? thank you. [[User:Itaqallah|<small><b><font color="#029DDD">ITAQALLAH</font></b></small>]] 01:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
540230 +++$+++ Itaqallah +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540229 +++$+++ 540229 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.172915280E09 +++$+++ they may not comply with [[WP:V]], but in those cases we fact tag and allow some time for it to be verified. immediate removal is not mandated, especially as they fall outside of WP:BLP.  +++$+++ :they may not comply with [[WP:V]], but in those cases we fact tag and allow some time for it to be verified. immediate removal is not mandated, especially as they fall outside of WP:BLP. [[User:Itaqallah|<small><b><font color="#029DDD">ITAQALLAH</font></b></small>]] 01:48, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
540231 +++$+++ Itaqallah +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540229 +++$+++ 540230 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.172917500E09 +++$+++ i thought i should also bring to your attention the [[List of former Muslims]].  +++$+++ ::i thought i should also bring to your attention the [[List of former Muslims]]. [[User:Itaqallah|<small><b><font color="#029DDD">ITAQALLAH</font></b></small>]] 02:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

613896 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613896 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-05 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.254729720E09 +++$+++ Since you were looking over the page, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/Drapier%27s_Letters\/archive1 care to leave any comments]?  +++$+++ Since you were looking over the page, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Drapier%27s_Letters/archive1 care to leave any comments]? [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 01:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
613897 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613896 +++$+++ 613896 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.254752640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the invitation! I've been getting bogged down a bit with serendipitous excursions arising from my watchlist as well as with die schreckliche deutsche Sprache, and [http:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?lr=&id=deWK2NGLbO4C&dq=%22the+mud%2C+how+deep+he+is%22&q=%22the+mud%2C+how+deep+he+is%22#v=snippet&q=%22the%20mud%2C%20how%20deep%20he%20is%22&f=false oh the Mud, how deep he is]! From a reliable publisher as a [http:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?id=deWK2NGLbO4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22the+mud,+how+deep+he+is%22&lr=&source=gbs_similarbooks_r&cad=3#v=onepage&q=%22a%20tramp%20abroad%20is%20set%20from%20a%20copy%20of%20the%20first%20american%20edition%22&f=false copy of the first edition]. Hope that will help you to resolve a little local difficulty,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:The_Awful_German_Language] without any need for mudslinging. But I digress. Have skimmed over the article, and indeed some points come to mind so I'll add my comments. Thanks for the heads-up,  +++$+++ :Thanks for the invitation! I've been getting bogged down a bit with serendipitous excursions arising from my watchlist as well as with die schreckliche deutsche Sprache, and [http://books.google.co.uk/books?lr=&id=deWK2NGLbO4C&dq=%22the+mud%2C+how+deep+he+is%22&q=%22the+mud%2C+how+deep+he+is%22#v=snippet&q=%22the%20mud%2C%20how%20deep%20he%20is%22&f=false oh the Mud, how deep he is]! From a reliable publisher as a [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=deWK2NGLbO4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22the+mud,+how+deep+he+is%22&lr=&source=gbs_similarbooks_r&cad=3#v=onepage&q=%22a%20tramp%20abroad%20is%20set%20from%20a%20copy%20of%20the%20first%20american%20edition%22&f=false copy of the first edition]. Hope that will help you to resolve a little local difficulty,[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Awful_German_Language] without any need for mudslinging. But I digress. Have skimmed over the article, and indeed some points come to mind so I'll add my comments. Thanks for the heads-up, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 07:24, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
613898 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613896 +++$+++ 613897 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.254776580E09 +++$+++ Haha, thanks. I was mostly going off the title and spelling based on the sources I had and what I knew to be trustworthy on Twain. If there was a first edition to check it again to prove what the original stated, then it would easily be changed over. I don't think the individual understood that, and I hate when people require jumping to something that we don't have any proof for. Standards and personal knowledge are a good starting place for research, but a lot of people want more. I had one request on another page where I talk about how a poem is related to the whole of Romantic poetry, even though none of the sources really said much in terms of its relationship to other Romantic poems (and most of the sources were major critics of Romantic poetry and discuss other works in relation to the whole, so, there was probably -no- relationship with the individual poem). Squeezing blood from a rock is the Wiki motto sometimes.  +++$+++ ::Haha, thanks. I was mostly going off the title and spelling based on the sources I had and what I knew to be trustworthy on Twain. If there was a first edition to check it again to prove what the original stated, then it would easily be changed over. I don't think the individual understood that, and I hate when people require jumping to something that we don't have any proof for. Standards and personal knowledge are a good starting place for research, but a lot of people want more. I had one request on another page where I talk about how a poem is related to the whole of Romantic poetry, even though none of the sources really said much in terms of its relationship to other Romantic poems (and most of the sources were major critics of Romantic poetry and discuss other works in relation to the whole, so, there was probably -no- relationship with the individual poem). Squeezing blood from a rock is the Wiki motto sometimes. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 14:03, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
613899 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613896 +++$+++ 613898 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.254780720E09 +++$+++ I know the feeling, and have one or two arguments simmering away. However, I think [[Penguin Books]] stating their version is \"set from a copy of the first american edition\" is as good as it gets, and it's worth changing from \"of\" to \"oh\". Found that by searching for the rest of the phrase, and the better sources \/ earlier editions do seem to consistendly use \"oh\". Much more poetic! . .  +++$+++ :::I know the feeling, and have one or two arguments simmering away. However, I think [[Penguin Books]] stating their version is "set from a copy of the first american edition" is as good as it gets, and it's worth changing from "of" to "oh". Found that by searching for the rest of the phrase, and the better sources / earlier editions do seem to consistendly use "oh". Much more poetic! . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:12, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
613900 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613896 +++$+++ 613899 +++$+++ 2009-10-06 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.254824640E09 +++$+++ Well, I would think the opposite of poetic would suit his purpose. :) I made the change and left a note that if someone finds another statement about a first edition that contradicts then it should be discussed. There have been some famous editing changes in history, and one I remember is \"solider Aristotle\" to \"soldier Aristotle\" (Yeats's \"Among School Children\", which dearly needs a page and I should get around to that sometime).  +++$+++ ::::Well, I would think the opposite of poetic would suit his purpose. :) I made the change and left a note that if someone finds another statement about a first edition that contradicts then it should be discussed. There have been some famous editing changes in history, and one I remember is "solider Aristotle" to "soldier Aristotle" (Yeats's "Among School Children", which dearly needs a page and I should get around to that sometime). [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 03:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
613901 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613896 +++$+++ 613900 +++$+++ 2009-10-06 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.254837420E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Ottava, perhaps he couldn't help but write well, I do seem to recall at least one analysis remarking how poetic it was. Nice editing change to Aristotle, hadn't heard that one. Am vaguely aware of various schoold of biblical studies and analysis but not much of literary studies, though did come across [http:\/\/www.shef.ac.uk\/bibs\/DJACcurrres\/Postmodern2\/Pooh.html this one]. . .  +++$+++ :::::Thanks, Ottava, perhaps he couldn't help but write well, I do seem to recall at least one analysis remarking how poetic it was. Nice editing change to Aristotle, hadn't heard that one. Am vaguely aware of various schoold of biblical studies and analysis but not much of literary studies, though did come across [http://www.shef.ac.uk/bibs/DJACcurrres/Postmodern2/Pooh.html this one]. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 06:57, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
613902 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613896 +++$+++ 613901 +++$+++ 2009-10-06 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.254862740E09 +++$+++ Oh wow, that better be humorous because I laughed the whole way through it. :)  +++$+++ ::::::Oh wow, that better be humorous because I laughed the whole way through it. :) [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 13:59, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
613903 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 613896 +++$+++ 613902 +++$+++ 2009-10-06 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.254868440E09 +++$+++ Well done! If you've not come across [[higher criticism]] and the like it can be puzzling rather than satirical, glad you liked it. .  +++$+++ :::::::Well done! If you've not come across [[higher criticism]] and the like it can be puzzling rather than satirical, glad you liked it. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:34, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

526945 +++$+++ 89.243.3.198 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526945 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-27 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.198815240E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/89.243.3.198|89.243.3.198]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/89.243.3.198|89.243.3.198]] ([[User talk:89.243.3.198|talk]]) 20:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
526946 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526945 +++$+++ 526945 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.198834140E09 +++$+++ Please do not post any further, as it would be a violation of your ban.  The conditions of a [[WP:ban|ban]] do not depend on your understanding. You may want to read my final response on [[User talk:Jeffpw|Jeffpw's talk page]].  I suggest you and all of your friends and classmates who have been involved in editing on Wikipedia in the past few months take a long break.  As you are students, it would benefit all of you if you would take the energy you have been spending on Wikipedia and Myspace and direct it toward your academic studies.  &mdash;  +++$+++ : Please do not post any further, as it would be a violation of your ban.  The conditions of a [[WP:ban|ban]] do not depend on your understanding. You may want to read my final response on [[User talk:Jeffpw|Jeffpw's talk page]].  I suggest you and all of your friends and classmates who have been involved in editing on Wikipedia in the past few months take a long break.  As you are students, it would benefit all of you if you would take the energy you have been spending on Wikipedia and Myspace and direct it toward your academic studies.  &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 01:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

540232 +++$+++ PajaBG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-05 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.173138300E09 +++$+++ Hello. Thanks for the keep vote on [[Vi\u0161njica]], you said some really nice things there :o) Greetings from Belgrade  +++$+++ Hello. Thanks for the keep vote on [[Višnjica]], you said some really nice things there :o) Greetings from Belgrade [[User:PajaBG|PajaBG]] 15:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
540233 +++$+++ PajaBG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540232 +++$+++ 540232 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 09:25:00 +++$+++ 1.173201900E09 +++$+++ You are right. That's why I wrote in the debate that if you only recycle what you already know or read you will never learn anything new. And I don't try to make things better. If it is a poor, visually unattractive neighborhood, slum...I write that and I had problems with other Serbian members of Wikipedia who thought no bad things should be written. My plan is to add all the known neighborhoods of Belgrade as stubs and then I will add other data, certainly merge some of them, etc. But it takes time. And...leave the Star Trek alone! :o))))) I am not a Trekkie who wears Starfleet uniforms or has no life outside of it, but I am the fan of the show :o) Take care  +++$+++ : You are right. That's why I wrote in the debate that if you only recycle what you already know or read you will never learn anything new. And I don't try to make things better. If it is a poor, visually unattractive neighborhood, slum...I write that and I had problems with other Serbian members of Wikipedia who thought no bad things should be written. My plan is to add all the known neighborhoods of Belgrade as stubs and then I will add other data, certainly merge some of them, etc. But it takes time. And...leave the Star Trek alone! :o))))) I am not a Trekkie who wears Starfleet uniforms or has no life outside of it, but I am the fan of the show :o) Take care [[User:PajaBG|PajaBG]] 09:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

15947 +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-23 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.306212480E09 +++$+++ There appear to be significant communities of [[Karaite]]s in USA, ex-USSR, Turkey.  Israel may well have the world's largest, but it would help to have a clear source.  +++$+++ There appear to be significant communities of [[Karaite]]s in USA, ex-USSR, Turkey.  Israel may well have the world's largest, but it would help to have a clear source. [[User:PatGallacher|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher#top|talk]]) 21:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
15948 +++$+++ Debresser +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15947 +++$+++ 15947 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.306250040E09 +++$+++ I am really not an expert. I know about the Israeli Karaite community. There are Karaites in the Crimea as well, historically, but I doubt whether they are organised into any sort of a community. I'll try to look around at the karaite websites, and if needed, will adjust the text of the article accordingly.  +++$+++ : I am really not an expert. I know about the Israeli Karaite community. There are Karaites in the Crimea as well, historically, but I doubt whether they are organised into any sort of a community. I'll try to look around at the karaite websites, and if needed, will adjust the text of the article accordingly. [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] ([[User talk:Debresser|talk]]) 08:14, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
15949 +++$+++ Debresser +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15947 +++$+++ 15947 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.306250820E09 +++$+++ See [[Karaites#Karaite_Judaism_by_region]] that there are various Karaite communities. I also found quite a few English karaite websites, including one of [http:\/\/www.karaites.org\/ Karaite Jews of America]. Nevertheless, the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Religion_in_Israel&diff=430645884&oldid=430579137 resulting edit] was a surprising one. See the editsummary for an explanation.  +++$+++ : See [[Karaites#Karaite_Judaism_by_region]] that there are various Karaite communities. I also found quite a few English karaite websites, including one of [http://www.karaites.org/ Karaite Jews of America]. Nevertheless, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religion_in_Israel&diff=430645884&oldid=430579137 resulting edit] was a surprising one. See the editsummary for an explanation. [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] ([[User talk:Debresser|talk]]) 08:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

540240 +++$+++ Greatestrowerever +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-30 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.175319480E09 +++$+++ To which article are you refering? as far as i am aware the only articles i have tagged are ones that do not have adequate references. I can assure you i have not been vandalising any articles. -- +++$+++ To which article are you refering? as far as i am aware the only articles i have tagged are ones that do not have adequate references. I can assure you i have not been vandalising any articles. --[[User:Greatestrowerever|Greatestrowerever]] 22:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
540241 +++$+++ Greatestrowerever +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540240 +++$+++ 540240 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.175320140E09 +++$+++ Maybe you should consider referencing it properly and then i wouldn't have attachede the tag.-- +++$+++ * Maybe you should consider referencing it properly and then i wouldn't have attachede the tag.--[[User:Greatestrowerever|Greatestrowerever]] 22:49, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

264803 +++$+++  +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-01 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.191231900E09 +++$+++ Mit sellem <nowiki>{{User swg}}<\/nowiki> sodd mr ebbs do, so wias scheint. Mir sent oineweg blo\xdf drei Kerle, net amole sieba Schwoba. --&nbsp; +++$+++ Mit sellem <nowiki>{{User swg}}</nowiki> sodd mr ebbs do, so wias scheint. Mir sent oineweg bloß drei Kerle, net amole sieba Schwoba. --&nbsp;[[User:Matthead|Matthead]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Matthead|<sup>discuß!</sup>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[EU|<font style="color:#ffff00;background:#0000cc;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;O&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</font>]]&nbsp; &nbsp; 02:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
264804 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264803 +++$+++ 264803 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.191280320E09 +++$+++ Ond wa moisch wa ma doa sodd? N Schbrochkurs \"Schw\xe4bisch fir Reigschmeggde\"? :-)   +++$+++ :Ond wa moisch wa ma doa sodd? N Schbrochkurs "Schwäbisch fir Reigschmeggde"? :-)  [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] 16:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
264805 +++$+++  +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264803 +++$+++ 264804 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.191341460E09 +++$+++ Awa, sell hilft au nex! Des Problem isch dass mr nemme woi\xdf wer scho \xe4lles Alemannisch schw\xe4tzt, weil \xe4lle wo den B\xe4bber \"D\xe4m Bnutzer sy Muetersprach isch Alemannisch\" henn gar nemme en dr [[:Category:User als]] uftaucha weil sell aus dem B\xe4bber rausgl\xf6scht [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3AUser_als&diff=154324962&oldid=138201187] worda isch - mr hat gmoint mr m\xfca\xdft \"als\" fir Albanisch reserviere, hano! Die Leit sollet sich dann selber eiordna, als \"swg\" fir ons Schwoba, \"gsw\" fir d'Helvetiker, hats ghoi\xdfa. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion\/Archive\/August_2007#Category:User_als_and_subcats]. Blo\xdf des woi\xdf koiner. Mir egal, I mach jetzt was mit dem B\xe4bbr.--&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Awa, sell hilft au nex! Des Problem isch dass mr nemme woiß wer scho älles Alemannisch schwätzt, weil älle wo den Bäbber "Däm Bnutzer sy Muetersprach isch Alemannisch" henn gar nemme en dr [[:Category:User als]] uftaucha weil sell aus dem Bäbber rausglöscht [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AUser_als&diff=154324962&oldid=138201187] worda isch - mr hat gmoint mr müaßt "als" fir Albanisch reserviere, hano! Die Leit sollet sich dann selber eiordna, als "swg" fir ons Schwoba, "gsw" fir d'Helvetiker, hats ghoißa. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/August_2007#Category:User_als_and_subcats]. Bloß des woiß koiner. Mir egal, I mach jetzt was mit dem Bäbbr.--&nbsp;[[User:Matthead|Matthead]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Matthead|<sup>discuß!</sup>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[EU|<font style="color:#ffff00;background:#0000cc;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;O&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</font>]]&nbsp; &nbsp; 09:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
264806 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264803 +++$+++ 264803 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.191371640E09 +++$+++ Kasch idd ibr dia Versiohsgschichd zruggfinda wia dia orschprongliche B\xe4bbr amohl ghett hod en noch dia guade Leid a Brichtle schigga?  +++$+++ : Kasch idd ibr dia Versiohsgschichd zruggfinda wia dia orschprongliche Bäbbr amohl ghett hod en noch dia guade Leid a Brichtle schigga? [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] 17:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
264807 +++$+++  +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264803 +++$+++ 264806 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.191372840E09 +++$+++ Den B\xe4bber <nowiki>{{user als}}<\/nowiki> han I omgschrieba, aber I ko net \xe4lle Leit nerve, dees w\xe4r \"Canvassing\".  Au\xdferdem hot oiner itz [[:Category:User als]] revertriert [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Category:User_als&curid=13002581&diff=161817716&oldid=161752271]. Jetztatle werdat a Haufa Leit als Albaner ufglistet. Sauglatt, gell?--&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Den Bäbber <nowiki>{{user als}}</nowiki> han I omgschrieba, aber I ko net älle Leit nerve, dees wär "Canvassing".  Außerdem hot oiner itz [[:Category:User als]] revertriert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:User_als&curid=13002581&diff=161817716&oldid=161752271]. Jetztatle werdat a Haufa Leit als Albaner ufglistet. Sauglatt, gell?--&nbsp;[[User:Matthead|Matthead]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Matthead|<sup>discuß!</sup>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[EU|<font style="color:#ffff00;background:#0000cc;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;O&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</font>]]&nbsp; &nbsp; 17:54, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
264808 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264803 +++$+++ 264803 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.191373920E09 +++$+++ Woisch, I wohn schau siabzeah Johr em Ausland (ond iddamohl im graussa Vaddrland sondern em \xe4chda Ausland) ond se hand me schau so vial ondrschiadlicha Nama ge\xe4, wenn se me etzt au noh als Albanr glassificeera dand, noch machd me des beinoh nix me aus. :-)   Abr worom isch's \"Canvassing\" wenn ma dLeid druff aufmergsahm machd wann ebbes veranderd isch?  +++$+++ : Woisch, I wohn schau siabzeah Johr em Ausland (ond iddamohl im graussa Vaddrland sondern em ächda Ausland) ond se hand me schau so vial ondrschiadlicha Nama geä, wenn se me etzt au noh als Albanr glassificeera dand, noch machd me des beinoh nix me aus. :-)   Abr worom isch's "Canvassing" wenn ma dLeid druff aufmergsahm machd wann ebbes veranderd isch? [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] 18:12, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
264809 +++$+++  +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264803 +++$+++ 264808 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.191374760E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Canvassing]] send dia Regla wo gelta. I bee liabr vorsichtig, net dass es au no hoi\xdft I w\xe4r Anti-Albanisch. Han scho gnuag Hader derzeit. --&nbsp; +++$+++ ::[[Wikipedia:Canvassing]] send dia Regla wo gelta. I bee liabr vorsichtig, net dass es au no hoißt I wär Anti-Albanisch. Han scho gnuag Hader derzeit. --&nbsp;[[User:Matthead|Matthead]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:Matthead|<sup>discuß!</sup>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[EU|<font style="color:#ffff00;background:#0000cc;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;O&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</font>]]&nbsp; &nbsp; 18:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

15957 +++$+++ Proxima Centauri +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15957 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310517720E09 +++$+++ If we claim it was lies and the conviction is overturned Wikipedia could be in trouble for libel.  +++$+++ If we claim it was lies and the conviction is overturned Wikipedia could be in trouble for libel. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] ([[User talk:Proxima Centauri|talk]]) 17:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
15958 +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ PatGallacher +++$+++ 15957 +++$+++ 15957 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.310517960E09 +++$+++ That could apply to any court case about the conviction of a living person.  Loads of media outlets have now said that he told lies in the first civil trial.  +++$+++ :That could apply to any court case about the conviction of a living person.  Loads of media outlets have now said that he told lies in the first civil trial. [[User:PatGallacher|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher#top|talk]]) 17:46, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

15964 +++$+++ Roamataa +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15964 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.172523600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for helping on Pogona minima. -- +++$+++ Thanks for helping on Pogona minima. --[[User:Roamataa|Roamataa]] 13:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
15965 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15964 +++$+++ 15964 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.172525700E09 +++$+++ No problem, glad to help -  +++$+++ : No problem, glad to help - [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 13:35, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
15966 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15964 +++$+++ 15964 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.174238640E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I can't help you with that. The only piece of info I have to offer is that his last name is spelled Waldenmaier, not Waldermaaier. Regards,  +++$+++ : Sorry, I can't help you with that. The only piece of info I have to offer is that his last name is spelled Waldenmaier, not Waldermaaier. Regards, [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 10:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

15967 +++$+++ Mattnad +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15967 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-23 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.174693620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your input on this. Frankly, I created this page to help find a depository for the \"wonderbra women\" that other wikipedians kept adding to the core Wonderbra article.  The earliest versions of the Wonderbra article contained this list but during the FAC process, it was pretty much agreed that this was a bit frivolous and it was eliminated.  I'm all ears on ways to better handle it. Since I'm relatively new to wikipedia, I'm not sure if there's another way of creating lists to accommodate the pop-oriented contributions.   +++$+++ Thanks for your input on this. Frankly, I created this page to help find a depository for the "wonderbra women" that other wikipedians kept adding to the core Wonderbra article.  The earliest versions of the Wonderbra article contained this list but during the FAC process, it was pretty much agreed that this was a bit frivolous and it was eliminated.  I'm all ears on ways to better handle it. Since I'm relatively new to wikipedia, I'm not sure if there's another way of creating lists to accommodate the pop-oriented contributions.  [[User:Mattnad|Mattnad]] 16:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
15968 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15967 +++$+++ 15967 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.174771680E09 +++$+++ Hi, I do not think the subject is notable enough to warrant its own page, hence the notability tag. IMO it should be merged into [[Wonderbra]] and is interesting enough to be mentioned there. If however the consensus is that it is frivolous and should be eliminated, than it certainly should not be moved to its own page but, as is the consensus, eliminated. Regards, -  +++$+++ : Hi, I do not think the subject is notable enough to warrant its own page, hence the notability tag. IMO it should be merged into [[Wonderbra]] and is interesting enough to be mentioned there. If however the consensus is that it is frivolous and should be eliminated, than it certainly should not be moved to its own page but, as is the consensus, eliminated. Regards, - [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 14:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

15969 +++$+++ Liga girl +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-22 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.179859200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the changes you have made to this article. I would like to have the titlle changed back to Linear IgA though, as noone ever refers to it as Linear Immunoglobulin A and most people looking for it would search for Linear iga, which doesnt bring up the article when searching via an external search engine such as google.  +++$+++ Thanks for the changes you have made to this article. I would like to have the titlle changed back to Linear IgA though, as noone ever refers to it as Linear Immunoglobulin A and most people looking for it would search for Linear iga, which doesnt bring up the article when searching via an external search engine such as google. [[User:Liga girl|Liga girl]] 11:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
15970 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15969 +++$+++ 15969 +++$+++ 2007-05-22 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.179860100E09 +++$+++ Hi Liga girl, for page titles I prefer the full, non-abbreviated name. People will still find this article when searching for \"Linear IgA\", as typing this will automatically redirect to the article. However, I leave it to your discretion. Kind regards,  +++$+++ : Hi Liga girl, for page titles I prefer the full, non-abbreviated name. People will still find this article when searching for "Linear IgA", as typing this will automatically redirect to the article. However, I leave it to your discretion. Kind regards, [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 11:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

540259 +++$+++ Tewfik +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540259 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-13 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.179048000E09 +++$+++ The [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2007_May_11#Palestine-related_CFRs|CfR]] was modified such that it seems to agree entirely with your comments there, so I hope that you might change your comments to support. As a side-note, I'm very hopeful that this passes due to the compromise and agreement on the part of both pro-Israeli and pro-Palestinian editors, not an overly common occurrence :-) Cheers, <font style=\"color:#22AA00;\">''' +++$+++ The [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_May_11#Palestine-related_CFRs|CfR]] was modified such that it seems to agree entirely with your comments there, so I hope that you might change your comments to support. As a side-note, I'm very hopeful that this passes due to the compromise and agreement on the part of both pro-Israeli and pro-Palestinian editors, not an overly common occurrence :-) Cheers, <font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 02:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
540260 +++$+++ Tewfik +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540259 +++$+++ 540259 +++$+++ 2007-05-13 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.179058200E09 +++$+++ I wasn't saying you were pro or anti anything, only pointing out that many people who often in disagreement about this sort of thing were more or less all accepting of it :-) I'll provide specific quotes if you like, but unless I've misunderstood your comments there, the renames that you've requested are now the same as those being proposed. Let me know, <font style=\"color:#22AA00;\">''' +++$+++ :I wasn't saying you were pro or anti anything, only pointing out that many people who often in disagreement about this sort of thing were more or less all accepting of it :-) I'll provide specific quotes if you like, but unless I've misunderstood your comments there, the renames that you've requested are now the same as those being proposed. Let me know, <font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 05:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

15972 +++$+++ Mjb +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15972 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-23 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.185238080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for helping to keep the external links on the [[acid house]] article free of spam. I've just posted a note to [[Talk:Acid house]] about the situation and hope that you and other editors with an interest in the article will continue to help with it. Cheers, \u2014 +++$+++ Thanks for helping to keep the external links on the [[acid house]] article free of spam. I've just posted a note to [[Talk:Acid house]] about the situation and hope that you and other editors with an interest in the article will continue to help with it. Cheers, —[[User:Mjb|mjb]] 17:48, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
15973 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15972 +++$+++ 15972 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.185317880E09 +++$+++ No prob, and I've just posted a message on the offending user's talk page. If he continues to spam, stronger measures could be taken. Regards,  +++$+++ : No prob, and I've just posted a message on the offending user's talk page. If he continues to spam, stronger measures could be taken. Regards, [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 15:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

278117 +++$+++ Squinnman +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-11 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.171232460E09 +++$+++ Are u the guy on TV Forum using the same name??  +++$+++ Are u the guy on TV Forum using the same name?? [[User:Squinnman|Squinnman]] 14:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
278118 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278117 +++$+++ 278117 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.172026200E09 +++$+++ Yes I am. Why do you ask?<br> +++$+++ :Yes I am. Why do you ask?<br>[[User:GMc|<font color="#0099ff"><b>G</b>Mc</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:GMc|'''<font color="#0099ff"><b>talk<b></font>''']]</sup> 18:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

15974 +++$+++ Mjb +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-14 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.192404300E09 +++$+++ If it continues, feel free to nominate them for a block on [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/3RR]]. \u2014 +++$+++ If it continues, feel free to nominate them for a block on [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR]]. —[[User:Mjb|mjb]] 16:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
15975 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15974 +++$+++ 15974 +++$+++ 2007-10-14 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.192409160E09 +++$+++ Thanks. So annoying...  +++$+++ : Thanks. So annoying... [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 17:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
15976 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15974 +++$+++ 15974 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.190751000E09 +++$+++ Je had per ongeluk de pagina opnieuw aangemaakt nadat het verwijderd was, vandaar de verwarring. Je blokkade is inmiddels opgeheven vanwege de onduidelijkheid of je nou wel of niet dezelfde was als de anonieme gebruiker die ''Leoh Ming Pei'' oorspronkelijk aanmaakte. Excuses voor de overlast :)  +++$+++ : Je had per ongeluk de pagina opnieuw aangemaakt nadat het verwijderd was, vandaar de verwarring. Je blokkade is inmiddels opgeheven vanwege de onduidelijkheid of je nou wel of niet dezelfde was als de anonieme gebruiker die ''Leoh Ming Pei'' oorspronkelijk aanmaakte. Excuses voor de overlast :) [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 13:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
15977 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15974 +++$+++ 15974 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.190816460E09 +++$+++ De blok is toch echt opgeheven, om half drie gistermiddag. Probeer je het nog eens? Groeten,  +++$+++ : De blok is toch echt opgeheven, om half drie gistermiddag. Probeer je het nog eens? Groeten, [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 07:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

177425 +++$+++ Damiens.rf +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ 177425 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310163840E09 +++$+++ Yours truly, Robert-Fran\xe7ois - aka -- +++$+++ Yours truly, Robert-François - aka --[[User:Damiens.rf|<span class="I_STALK_DAMIENS">damiens.rf</span>]] 15:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
177426 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ 177425 +++$+++ 177425 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.310176740E09 +++$+++ Damiens, believe or not I consider you an excellent person and I am not ashamed to say that I have learned a  lot form you. I will think about it.  +++$+++ *Damiens, believe or not I consider you an excellent person and I am not ashamed to say that I have learned a  lot form you. I will think about it. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71#top|talk]]) 18:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

540265 +++$+++ Tewfik +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540265 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-27 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.180266480E09 +++$+++ I was wondering what you thought about [[:Category:Cities, towns and villages in the Palestinian territories]] and the [[:Category:Buildings and structures in the Palestinian territories]] hierarchy. I'm fearful of listing them at CfD due to the contention in the area unless I could be sure that it was appropriate. Cheers, <font style=\"color:#22AA00;\">''' +++$+++ I was wondering what you thought about [[:Category:Cities, towns and villages in the Palestinian territories]] and the [[:Category:Buildings and structures in the Palestinian territories]] hierarchy. I'm fearful of listing them at CfD due to the contention in the area unless I could be sure that it was appropriate. Cheers, <font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 04:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
540266 +++$+++ Tewfik +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540265 +++$+++ 540265 +++$+++ 2007-06-19 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.182243540E09 +++$+++ I hope I did [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2007_June_19#Geography_of_the_Palestinian_territories|this]] correctly. Feel free to suggest any changes or rewording. <font style=\"color:#22AA00;\">''' +++$+++ :I hope I did [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_June_19#Geography_of_the_Palestinian_territories|this]] correctly. Feel free to suggest any changes or rewording. <font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 01:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

278122 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-18 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.174239120E09 +++$+++ Please remember to mark your edits as '''m'''inor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see [[Wikipedia:Minor edit]]). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette.  The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Thanks! <!-- Template:Minor -->  -- +++$+++ Please remember to mark your edits as '''m'''inor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see [[Wikipedia:Minor edit]]). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette.  The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Thanks! <!-- Template:Minor -->  --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]) 10:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
278123 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278122 +++$+++ 278122 +++$+++ 2007-03-20 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.174442880E09 +++$+++ Why are you ignoring my comments here?  You keep reverting to incorrect formatting. -- +++$+++ :Why are you ignoring my comments here?  You keep reverting to incorrect formatting. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]) 19:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

15980 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-25 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.193342700E09 +++$+++ We could send them to [[WP:RCU#Requests_for_IP_check|Wikipedia:Requests for Checkuser]]. It may help, as they appear to have a never-ending appetite to vandalise the Acid House article. Regards,  +++$+++ We could send them to [[WP:RCU#Requests_for_IP_check|Wikipedia:Requests for Checkuser]]. It may help, as they appear to have a never-ending appetite to vandalise the Acid House article. Regards, [[User:Rudget|Rudget]] <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rudget|Contributions]]</sub> 13:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
15981 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15980 +++$+++ 15980 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.193343840E09 +++$+++ Yes please, take whatever action you can. Perhaps [[Acid house]] should also be semiprotected as I suggested. Thanks!  +++$+++ : Yes please, take whatever action you can. Perhaps [[Acid house]] should also be semiprotected as I suggested. Thanks! [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 13:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
15982 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15980 +++$+++ 15981 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.193345760E09 +++$+++ I've filed a request for [[WP:RFP|page protection]] as suggested, and proposed a two-week covering (as of yet no response has been made). I'll ask another editor about the IP vandalism for now, if they don't reply I'll try to get them all blocked, because it's quite clear there intentions aren't to help Wikipedia. Thanks once again for bringing this to my attention. Regards,  +++$+++ ::I've filed a request for [[WP:RFP|page protection]] as suggested, and proposed a two-week covering (as of yet no response has been made). I'll ask another editor about the IP vandalism for now, if they don't reply I'll try to get them all blocked, because it's quite clear there intentions aren't to help Wikipedia. Thanks once again for bringing this to my attention. Regards, [[User:Rudget|Rudget]] <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rudget|Contributions]]</sub> 13:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
15983 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15980 +++$+++ 15982 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.193348040E09 +++$+++ Great. You're a star!  +++$+++ ::: Great. You're a star! [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 14:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

570642 +++$+++ Eastlaw +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-09 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.236591240E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that, I didn't realize it would be a problem.  I was updating categories and I didn't realize I needed to turn off the \"genfixes\" feature.  I will go back and see if there are any more problems.  --'' +++$+++ Sorry about that, I didn't realize it would be a problem.  I was updating categories and I didn't realize I needed to turn off the "genfixes" feature.  I will go back and see if there are any more problems.  --''[[User:Eastlaw|<span style="color:#810102">Eastlaw</span>]]'' <sup>''[[User talk:Eastlaw|talk]]''</sup>&nbsp;⁄&nbsp;<sub>''[[Special:Contributions/Eastlaw|contribs]]''</sub> 02:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
570643 +++$+++ Eastlaw +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570642 +++$+++ 570642 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.236592380E09 +++$+++ All right, I think I fixed all of them.  If you notice any more problems, please let me know.  I really try to be careful with template edits, so if I screw up [[WP:AGF|please don't be too cross with me]].  --'' +++$+++ :All right, I think I fixed all of them.  If you notice any more problems, please let me know.  I really try to be careful with template edits, so if I screw up [[WP:AGF|please don't be too cross with me]].  --''[[User:Eastlaw|<span style="color:#810102">Eastlaw</span>]]'' <sup>''[[User talk:Eastlaw|talk]]''</sup>&nbsp;⁄&nbsp;<sub>''[[Special:Contributions/Eastlaw|contribs]]''</sub> 02:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
570644 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570642 +++$+++ 570643 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.236594420E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 03:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
570645 +++$+++ Eastlaw +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570642 +++$+++ 570644 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.236599280E09 +++$+++ Just FYI, I don't know how much familiarity you have with [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser|AutoWikiBrowser]], but among the things it does is apply a range of [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser\/User_manual#Options_2|general fixes]] to the pages one edits with it.  99 times out of 100, this causes no major problems, and is in fact a positive feature.  Apparently, I unwittingly stumbled upon that one time out of 100 where it causes problems!  Oh well, you live, you learn... --'' +++$+++ :::Just FYI, I don't know how much familiarity you have with [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser|AutoWikiBrowser]], but among the things it does is apply a range of [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/User_manual#Options_2|general fixes]] to the pages one edits with it.  99 times out of 100, this causes no major problems, and is in fact a positive feature.  Apparently, I unwittingly stumbled upon that one time out of 100 where it causes problems!  Oh well, you live, you learn... --''[[User:Eastlaw|<span style="color:#810102">Eastlaw</span>]]'' <sup>''[[User talk:Eastlaw|talk]]''</sup>&nbsp;⁄&nbsp;<sub>''[[Special:Contributions/Eastlaw|contribs]]''</sub> 04:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
570646 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570642 +++$+++ 570645 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.236655740E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 20:29, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
570647 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570642 +++$+++ 570642 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.236850260E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 02:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
570648 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570642 +++$+++ 570642 +++$+++ 2009-03-13 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.236930420E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 00:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
570649 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570642 +++$+++ 570642 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.237104960E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 01:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

540270 +++$+++ Tewfik +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-25 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.185405840E09 +++$+++ Hola mi amigo, perhaps now is a good time? <font style=\"color:#22AA00;\">''' +++$+++ Hola mi amigo, perhaps now is a good time? <font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 16:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
540271 +++$+++ Tewfik +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540270 +++$+++ 540270 +++$+++ 2007-07-30 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.185837300E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure if you saw this earlier - do let me know either way. Cheers, <font style=\"color:#22AA00;\">''' +++$+++ :I'm not sure if you saw this earlier - do let me know either way. Cheers, <font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 16:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

614333 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-15 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.279178220E09 +++$+++ I have a question about this post: \"More recently, Marknutley (talk \xb7 contribs) and Tillman (talk \xb7 contribs) have been arguing for inclusion in the biography of a scientist of a link to the article on The Hockey Stick Illusion, a barely notable book promoting fringe views and attacking the scientist's work, which has been ignored by the mainstream.[665]\". The graph shows temps going up which would seem to support the AGW theory, yet your post calls it a fringe theory I don't get it. Can you enlighten me? Pls answer on my talk page. Tks. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ I have a question about this post: "More recently, Marknutley (talk · contribs) and Tillman (talk · contribs) have been arguing for inclusion in the biography of a scientist of a link to the article on The Hockey Stick Illusion, a barely notable book promoting fringe views and attacking the scientist's work, which has been ignored by the mainstream.[665]". The graph shows temps going up which would seem to support the AGW theory, yet your post calls it a fringe theory I don't get it. Can you enlighten me? Pls answer on my talk page. Tks. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 00:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
614334 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614333 +++$+++ 614333 +++$+++ 2010-07-15 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.279206480E09 +++$+++ Responded as requested, some of the research will probably be useful elsewhere. .  +++$+++ :Responded as requested, some of the research will probably be useful elsewhere. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 08:08, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

15984 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15984 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-25 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.193354280E09 +++$+++ It has now been protected.  +++$+++ It has now been protected. [[User:Rudget|Rudget]] <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rudget|Contributions]]</sub> 16:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
15985 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15984 +++$+++ 15984 +++$+++ 2007-10-26 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.193411280E09 +++$+++ Smashing!  +++$+++ : Smashing! [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 08:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
15986 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15984 +++$+++ 15984 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.194911280E09 +++$+++ Hello again Jvhertum. I see what you mean, unfortunately I am going to refrain from requesting protection of the page, and I suggest you do the same, as I am certain that the admin who would do the task would like to see more vandalism, i.e. a bigger and more better rationale for requesting protection of the page. Wait to see if there is anymore unconstructive or vandal edits (circa.10 edits) and then ask [[WP:RFP|here]], as I'm sure you already know. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello again Jvhertum. I see what you mean, unfortunately I am going to refrain from requesting protection of the page, and I suggest you do the same, as I am certain that the admin who would do the task would like to see more vandalism, i.e. a bigger and more better rationale for requesting protection of the page. Wait to see if there is anymore unconstructive or vandal edits (circa.10 edits) and then ask [[WP:RFP|here]], as I'm sure you already know. Regards, [[User:Rudget|<font size="+1">''R''</font>udget]] <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rudget|zŋ]]</sub> 15:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
15987 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15984 +++$+++ 15986 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.194971640E09 +++$+++ Thanks, we'll wait 'n' see!  +++$+++ :: Thanks, we'll wait 'n' see! [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] 08:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

439571 +++$+++ Coren +++$+++ M1ss1ontomars2k4 +++$+++ 439571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-04 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.196829960E09 +++$+++ Your account appears to have been compromised since it just went on a rash of very uncharacteristic vandalism; I have blocked it indefinitely.  If you want, you can establish your identity and we can unblock it.  &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ Your account appears to have been compromised since it just went on a rash of very uncharacteristic vandalism; I have blocked it indefinitely.  If you want, you can establish your identity and we can unblock it.  &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 20:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
439572 +++$+++ Phoenix-wiki +++$+++ M1ss1ontomars2k4 +++$+++ 439571 +++$+++ 439571 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.196831280E09 +++$+++ Yeah, its nothing personal. The relevant ANI post is at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#Peculiar actions of apparently non-vandalist editor]]. Well, we're starting to think there's nothing wrong here and you should be unblocked whenever. In the mean time, you can create an alternate account to take part in the discussion (We ''are'' blocking you because we think your account is compromised, not because your a vandal or anything like that, so it's okay)-- +++$+++ :Yeah, its nothing personal. The relevant ANI post is at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Peculiar actions of apparently non-vandalist editor]]. Well, we're starting to think there's nothing wrong here and you should be unblocked whenever. In the mean time, you can create an alternate account to take part in the discussion (We ''are'' blocking you because we think your account is compromised, not because your a vandal or anything like that, so it's okay)--[[User:Phoenix-wiki|Phoenix-wiki]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Phoenix-wiki|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Phoenix-wiki|contribs]])</sup> 21:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

15988 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15988 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-24 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.198566600E09 +++$+++ I changed the external link to \"Interview with Bobby Farrell\" like you said; if the video gets deleted from the site for copyvio concerns then we can remove it all together. &nbsp; ''' +++$+++ I changed the external link to "Interview with Bobby Farrell" like you said; if the video gets deleted from the site for copyvio concerns then we can remove it all together. &nbsp; '''[[User:Jj137|<font color="green">jj137</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Jj137|♠]]</sup> 23:10, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
15989 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15988 +++$+++ 15988 +++$+++ 2007-12-24 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.198567080E09 +++$+++ Thanks, you're a star.  +++$+++ : Thanks, you're a star. [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] ([[User talk:Jvhertum#top|talk]]) 23:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
15990 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15988 +++$+++ 15989 +++$+++ 2007-12-24 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.198567380E09 +++$+++ No problem, and happy holidays! &nbsp; ''' +++$+++ ::No problem, and happy holidays! &nbsp; '''[[User:Jj137|<font color="green">jj137</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Jj137|♠]]</sup> 23:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
15991 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15988 +++$+++ 15990 +++$+++ 2007-12-28 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.198889280E09 +++$+++ I removed the external link altogether and alerted USRepublican we couldn't use it. Hopefully this is all settled now. --&nbsp; ''' +++$+++ :::I removed the external link altogether and alerted USRepublican we couldn't use it. Hopefully this is all settled now. --&nbsp; '''[[User:Jj137|<font color="green">jj137</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Jj137|♠]]</sup> 16:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
15992 +++$+++ Jauerback +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15988 +++$+++ 15988 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.199411520E09 +++$+++ No problem on the assist.  He wasn't too happy about it and then left me some [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Jauerback&diff=181876043&oldid=181875989 wonderful notes of appreciation].  The IP got blocked for 48 (I think) hours, so he'll be out of your hair for a little bit.   +++$+++ :No problem on the assist.  He wasn't too happy about it and then left me some [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jauerback&diff=181876043&oldid=181875989 wonderful notes of appreciation].  The IP got blocked for 48 (I think) hours, so he'll be out of your hair for a little bit.  [[User:Jauerback|Jauerback]] ([[User talk:Jauerback|talk]]) 17:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
15993 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15988 +++$+++ 15992 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.199424120E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately we're not supposed to protect pages due to one editor (and he's blocked). Obviously if it starts up again by him or someone else I'll give it a long protection. &nbsp; ''' +++$+++ ::Unfortunately we're not supposed to protect pages due to one editor (and he's blocked). Obviously if it starts up again by him or someone else I'll give it a long protection. &nbsp; '''[[User:Jj137|<font color="green">jj137</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Jj137|♠]]</sup> 21:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
15994 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15988 +++$+++ 15992 +++$+++ 2008-01-04 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.199472660E09 +++$+++ Okay,  no prob. The block should do the trick for now.  +++$+++ :: Okay,  no prob. The block should do the trick for now. [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] ([[User talk:Jvhertum#top|talk]]) 10:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
15995 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15988 +++$+++ 15994 +++$+++ 2008-01-16 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.200555300E09 +++$+++ The IP editor has requested the information be placed back on the page for the time being. &nbsp; ''' +++$+++ :::The IP editor has requested the information be placed back on the page for the time being. &nbsp; '''[[User:Jj137|<font color="green">jj137</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Jj137|♠]]</sup> 23:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

278133 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278133 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-05 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.178395980E09 +++$+++ Don't be silly.  First, \"unexplained\" means that no edit summary was given; I gave one.  \"Unsourced\" is irrelevant when the edit consists solely of making a correction in line with MoS or WikiProject style. -- +++$+++ Don't be silly.  First, "unexplained" means that no edit summary was given; I gave one.  "Unsourced" is irrelevant when the edit consists solely of making a correction in line with MoS or WikiProject style. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]) 13:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
278134 +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278133 +++$+++ 278133 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.178396220E09 +++$+++ Mel, you changed [http:\/\/www.tgbbq.com www.tgbbq.com] to http:\/\/www.tgbbq.com - stating in your edit summary \"tidied\" isn't very acurate, is it? +++$+++ :Mel, you changed [http://www.tgbbq.com www.tgbbq.com] to http://www.tgbbq.com - stating in your edit summary "tidied" isn't very acurate, is it?[[User:GMc|GMc]] 13:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
278135 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278133 +++$+++ 278134 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.178416080E09 +++$+++ It's as accurate as it needs to be; the piped form isn't in the WikiProject, and I can in any case see no point. -- +++$+++ ::It's as accurate as it needs to be; the piped form isn't in the WikiProject, and I can in any case see no point. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]) 18:48, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

46356 +++$+++ Knave +++$+++ Thankyoubaby +++$+++ 46356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-10 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.218431640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Knave|Knave]] ([[User talk:Knave|talk]]) 22:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
46357 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Thankyoubaby +++$+++ 46356 +++$+++ 46356 +++$+++ 2006-01-29 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.138593660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your message.  I removed the lists of performances because it wasn't really clear what they were, nor if they were (or whether they could be) complete.  Other articles on singles don't usually include such lists, but if you could make a case for them they could go back in. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for your message.  I removed the lists of performances because it wasn't really clear what they were, nor if they were (or whether they could be) complete.  Other articles on singles don't usually include such lists, but if you could make a case for them they could go back in. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 20:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

540284 +++$+++ Ozgod +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540284 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-13 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.184393400E09 +++$+++ For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|for biographies]], [[WP:WEB|for web sites]], [[WP:BAND|for bands]], or [[WP:CORP|for companies]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn -->   +++$+++ For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|for biographies]], [[WP:WEB|for web sites]], [[WP:BAND|for bands]], or [[WP:CORP|for companies]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn -->  [[User:Ozgod|Ozgod]] 23:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
540285 +++$+++ Ozgod +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540284 +++$+++ 540284 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.184618580E09 +++$+++ My concern isn't that exists or that it is sourced but that it is [[Wikipedia:Notability|non-notable]]. Besides being a town in Alabama, what claim to notability does it have?-- +++$+++ :My concern isn't that exists or that it is sourced but that it is [[Wikipedia:Notability|non-notable]]. Besides being a town in Alabama, what claim to notability does it have?--[[User:Ozgod|Ozgod]] 13:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

15997 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-18 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.200717300E09 +++$+++ Hi again, if you notice, [[WP:RSUE]] is part of [[WP:V]]; it covers ''sources'' (references). If you noticed, I included the link as an ''external link'' (the IP editor was going crazy to get it back in somewhere). I think it's a compromise. &nbsp; ''' +++$+++ Hi again, if you notice, [[WP:RSUE]] is part of [[WP:V]]; it covers ''sources'' (references). If you noticed, I included the link as an ''external link'' (the IP editor was going crazy to get it back in somewhere). I think it's a compromise. &nbsp; '''[[User:Jj137|<font color="green">jj137</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Jj137|♠]]</sup> 20:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
15998 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15997 +++$+++ 15997 +++$+++ 2008-01-19 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.200792300E09 +++$+++ You seem to speak Dutch from your userpage. Does he actually say anything about a gay-for-pay or not? &nbsp; ''' +++$+++ :You seem to speak Dutch from your userpage. Does he actually say anything about a gay-for-pay or not? &nbsp; '''[[User:Jj137|<font color="green">jj137</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Jj137|♠]]</sup> 17:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
15999 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15997 +++$+++ 15998 +++$+++ 2008-01-20 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.200859560E09 +++$+++ I do speak Dutch, in fact I am an admin of the Dutch Wikipedia. Could we please move beyond this now? The YouTube clip is not a valid source per [[WP:RSUE]], as I have pointed out repeatedly. Let's please put this discussion to bed. Regards,  +++$+++ :: I do speak Dutch, in fact I am an admin of the Dutch Wikipedia. Could we please move beyond this now? The YouTube clip is not a valid source per [[WP:RSUE]], as I have pointed out repeatedly. Let's please put this discussion to bed. Regards, [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] ([[User talk:Jvhertum#top|talk]]) 12:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
16000 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 15997 +++$+++ 15999 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.200983220E09 +++$+++ We're not including it as a source, but simply as a link. &nbsp; ''' +++$+++ :::We're not including it as a source, but simply as a link. &nbsp; '''[[User:Jj137|<font color="green">jj137</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Jj137|♠]]</sup> 22:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

278142 +++$+++ Fayenatic_london +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.181088360E09 +++$+++ Hi, I don't understand why you removed [[:Category:GMTV presenters and reporters]] and [[:Category:GMTV programmes]] from [[:Category:GMTV]], and redirected the latter category to an article. I'm used to seeing changes to categories being discussed first at [[WP:CFD]]; did I miss this one? -  +++$+++ Hi, I don't understand why you removed [[:Category:GMTV presenters and reporters]] and [[:Category:GMTV programmes]] from [[:Category:GMTV]], and redirected the latter category to an article. I'm used to seeing changes to categories being discussed first at [[WP:CFD]]; did I miss this one? - [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic london]] [[User_talk:Fayenatic_london|(talk)]] 17:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
278143 +++$+++ Fayenatic_london +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278142 +++$+++ 278142 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.181221980E09 +++$+++ As you are still actively editing but have not replied to this, I have restored [[:Category:GMTV]] to use. -  +++$+++ :As you are still actively editing but have not replied to this, I have restored [[:Category:GMTV]] to use. - [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic london]] [[User_talk:Fayenatic_london|(talk)]] 06:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
278144 +++$+++ Fayenatic_london +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278142 +++$+++ 278143 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.181762280E09 +++$+++ Hello again, I did give you a link to [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion]], which is the place to propose deletion of categories.  Please also note that when proposing deletion of an article or category, it is polite to inform its creator on his\/her talk page. -  +++$+++ ::Hello again, I did give you a link to [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion]], which is the place to propose deletion of categories.  Please also note that when proposing deletion of an article or category, it is polite to inform its creator on his/her talk page. - [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic london]] [[User_talk:Fayenatic_london|(talk)]] 12:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

16002 +++$+++ Buster7 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-07 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.210226580E09 +++$+++ The title of the Map is ...A Most Exact Map of Flanders of Austrian Netherlands. Not sure why you undid my edit.-- +++$+++ The title of the Map is ...A Most Exact Map of Flanders of Austrian Netherlands. Not sure why you undid my edit.--[[User:Buster7|Buster7]] ([[User talk:Buster7|talk]]) 23:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
16003 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16002 +++$+++ 16002 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.210264080E09 +++$+++ Because Flanders was ''part'' of the Austrian Netherlands.  +++$+++ : Because Flanders was ''part'' of the Austrian Netherlands. [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] ([[User talk:Jvhertum#top|talk]]) 09:28, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

264811 +++$+++ Victuallers +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-11 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.194806400E09 +++$+++ I.m keen to see your recent abbey article on the main page, but there are no references. Can this be fixed?  +++$+++ I.m keen to see your recent abbey article on the main page, but there are no references. Can this be fixed? [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] 10:40, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
264812 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264811 +++$+++ 264811 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.194829440E09 +++$+++ Do you mean Rot an der Rot Abbey? I've got most of the information from leaflets and brochures I bought at the monastery when I was there in the summer. I don't know as to whether they are quotable. I also used a bit from the German Wikipedia and translated that.  +++$+++ :Do you mean Rot an der Rot Abbey? I've got most of the information from leaflets and brochures I bought at the monastery when I was there in the summer. I don't know as to whether they are quotable. I also used a bit from the German Wikipedia and translated that. [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] 17:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

16006 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16006 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-11 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.213175160E09 +++$+++ I removed the link... I'm still not sure what to do about this in the long run; I was hoping it would \"die away\" but apparently not any more. :( &nbsp; ''' +++$+++ I removed the link... I'm still not sure what to do about this in the long run; I was hoping it would "die away" but apparently not any more. :( &nbsp; '''[[User:Jj137|<font color="#E34234">jj137</font>]] [[User talk:Jj137|<font color="#E34234">(</font><font color="gray">talk</font><font color="#E34234">)</font>]]''' 02:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
16007 +++$+++ USRepublican +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16006 +++$+++ 16006 +++$+++ 2008-06-11 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.213181940E09 +++$+++ Then don't say it's \"inappropriate\" and don't contradict your own statements which you made on this page earlier, and last but not least formulate your own educated opinion on the matter, rather than satisfying other contributors' flagrantly biased vested interests.  +++$+++ :Then don't say it's "inappropriate" and don't contradict your own statements which you made on this page earlier, and last but not least formulate your own educated opinion on the matter, rather than satisfying other contributors' flagrantly biased vested interests. [[User:USRepublican|USRepublican]] ([[User talk:USRepublican|talk]]) 03:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

540295 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-16 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.184653380E09 +++$+++ The first deletion, the first protect and the first block give you a really warm glow, I found. --<font color=\"Red\"> +++$+++ The first deletion, the first protect and the first block give you a really warm glow, I found. --<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony.bradbury|'''Anthony.bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 23:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
540296 +++$+++ Politics rule +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540295 +++$+++ 540295 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.184653980E09 +++$+++ Congratulations!  +++$+++ :Congratulations! [[User:Politics rule|Politics rule]] 23:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

16012 +++$+++ Hersfold +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16012 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-25 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.238030880E09 +++$+++ Where are you seeing this? The link isn't in the template itself, so it's probably being used in the template on a particular article. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue\">Hers<\/em><em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold\">fold<\/em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold\/t|t]]\/ +++$+++ Where are you seeing this? The link isn't in the template itself, so it's probably being used in the template on a particular article. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold</em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold/t|t]]/[[User:Hersfold/a|a]]/[[Special:Contributions/Hersfold|c]])</sup> 18:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
16013 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16012 +++$+++ 16012 +++$+++ 2009-03-26 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.238108700E09 +++$+++ I cannot reproduce this anymore. I was seeing the spam link on multiple citation templates. The problem must have solved itself :)  +++$+++ : I cannot reproduce this anymore. I was seeing the spam link on multiple citation templates. The problem must have solved itself :) [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] ([[User talk:Jvhertum#top|talk]]) 16:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

540302 +++$+++ NapoliRoma +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-17 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.184733720E09 +++$+++ Hi, this speedy is not just a work->author, it's an implausible typo masquerading as a work->author .  I'd have no problem with [[The Sea Named \"Solaris\"]] (that's the real name of the song) redirecting to  [[Isao Tomita]], but this existing redir is wrong in at least three ways: wrong capitalization (\"called\" instead of \"Called\"), wrong word (\"called\" instead of \"Named\"), wrong punctuation (\"Solaris\" not in quotes). If this particular redir made sense, we'd need seven other variations for completeness' sake.  Does it really need to go through RFD?-- +++$+++ Hi, this speedy is not just a work->author, it's an implausible typo masquerading as a work->author .  I'd have no problem with [[The Sea Named "Solaris"]] (that's the real name of the song) redirecting to  [[Isao Tomita]], but this existing redir is wrong in at least three ways: wrong capitalization ("called" instead of "Called"), wrong word ("called" instead of "Named"), wrong punctuation ("Solaris" not in quotes). If this particular redir made sense, we'd need seven other variations for completeness' sake.  Does it really need to go through RFD?--[[User:NapoliRoma|NapoliRoma]] 21:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
540303 +++$+++ NapoliRoma +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540302 +++$+++ 540302 +++$+++ 2007-07-17 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.184735280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reconsidering!-- +++$+++ :Thanks for reconsidering!--[[User:NapoliRoma|NapoliRoma]] 22:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

16015 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-26 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.248666240E09 +++$+++ A friend just pointed me toward [[Vrouwekerk]]--congratulations on that and on the other nice articles you have produced on Dutch topics. If at any time you feel inclined to write on, for instance, any of [[Annie M.G. Schmidt]]'s books, I'd be much obliged: you have easier access to Dutch sources than I do. I'm trying to fill in some of the blanks in Dutch literature, but it goes slowly. De groeten, en ik hoop dat het nu eindelijk mooi weer is in Amsterdam,  +++$+++ A friend just pointed me toward [[Vrouwekerk]]--congratulations on that and on the other nice articles you have produced on Dutch topics. If at any time you feel inclined to write on, for instance, any of [[Annie M.G. Schmidt]]'s books, I'd be much obliged: you have easier access to Dutch sources than I do. I'm trying to fill in some of the blanks in Dutch literature, but it goes slowly. De groeten, en ik hoop dat het nu eindelijk mooi weer is in Amsterdam, [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:44, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
16016 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16015 +++$+++ 16015 +++$+++ 2009-07-28 08:45:00 +++$+++ 1.248795900E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot! I write primarily for the Dutch Wikipedia and [[Vrouwekerk]] is a translation of my article there. Will try to make time to write on Annie M.G. Schmidt' work, perhaps ''Abeltje'' or ''Minoes''. Take care,  +++$+++ : Thanks a lot! I write primarily for the Dutch Wikipedia and [[Vrouwekerk]] is a translation of my article there. Will try to make time to write on Annie M.G. Schmidt' work, perhaps ''Abeltje'' or ''Minoes''. Take care, [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] ([[User talk:Jvhertum#top|talk]]) 08:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
16017 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16015 +++$+++ 16016 +++$+++ 2009-07-30 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.249006260E09 +++$+++ '''Suggestion''': The Vrouwekerk article should be moved to Vrouwekerk, Leiden. As I'm sure you are aware, it is not the only Vrouwekerk in the Netherlands.  +++$+++ ::'''Suggestion''': The Vrouwekerk article should be moved to Vrouwekerk, Leiden. As I'm sure you are aware, it is not the only Vrouwekerk in the Netherlands. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 19:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
16018 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16015 +++$+++ 16017 +++$+++ 2009-08-01 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.249152480E09 +++$+++ Actually, I am not aware of that. To my knowledge it is the only church with this name. Can you name any examples?  +++$+++ ::: Actually, I am not aware of that. To my knowledge it is the only church with this name. Can you name any examples? [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] ([[User talk:Jvhertum#top|talk]]) 11:48, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

16020 +++$+++ Ironholds +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16020 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-19 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.261210020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for this article - could you please use inline citations? Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks for this article - could you please use inline citations? Thanks, [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 00:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
16021 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16020 +++$+++ 16020 +++$+++ 2010-01-20 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.264031100E09 +++$+++ Also, the deep house page clear states that the DJs and artists listed should have their own page on Wikipedia, and the ones you added did not. Obviously the artists listed should be noted representatives of the genre, so please do not add your friends and acquaintances.  +++$+++ :Also, the deep house page clear states that the DJs and artists listed should have their own page on Wikipedia, and the ones you added did not. Obviously the artists listed should be noted representatives of the genre, so please do not add your friends and acquaintances. [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] ([[User talk:Jvhertum#top|talk]]) 15:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

278165 +++$+++ TheIslander +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278165 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-03 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.186210260E09 +++$+++ It's interesting to note that you've changed itv.com\/citv to citv.co.uk on the main article, no doubt because itv.com\/citv no longer redirects straight to that site. The reason that it is interesting is that I changed it to that way back in December 2006, upon which you started an edit war, insisting that it should be itv.com\/citv. There's even the discussion we had still on the CITV list article talk page. Just thought I'd point it out ;)  +++$+++ It's interesting to note that you've changed itv.com/citv to citv.co.uk on the main article, no doubt because itv.com/citv no longer redirects straight to that site. The reason that it is interesting is that I changed it to that way back in December 2006, upon which you started an edit war, insisting that it should be itv.com/citv. There's even the discussion we had still on the CITV list article talk page. Just thought I'd point it out ;) [[User:TheIslander|<sub><font color="DarkGray">'''The'''</font></sub><font color="Blue">'''Islander'''</font>]] 23:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
278166 +++$+++ TheIslander +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278165 +++$+++ 278165 +++$+++ 2007-08-08 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.186630380E09 +++$+++ As I explained last time, CITV advertise both itv.com\/citv '''and''' citv.co.uk. As the latter is the actual adress, it is the one that should be used - why link to a redirect?  +++$+++ :As I explained last time, CITV advertise both itv.com/citv '''and''' citv.co.uk. As the latter is the actual adress, it is the one that should be used - why link to a redirect? [[User:TheIslander|<sub><font color="DarkGray">'''The'''</font></sub><font color="Blue">'''Islander'''</font>]] 20:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
278167 +++$+++ TheIslander +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278165 +++$+++ 278166 +++$+++ 2007-08-08 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.186630620E09 +++$+++ Hmm, funny, I must have imagined it... come on, assume a little [[Wikipedia:Assume Good Faith|good faith]], I've seen it with my own eyes.  +++$+++ ::Hmm, funny, I must have imagined it... come on, assume a little [[Wikipedia:Assume Good Faith|good faith]], I've seen it with my own eyes. [[User:TheIslander|<sub><font color="DarkGray">'''The'''</font></sub><font color="Blue">'''Islander'''</font>]] 20:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

540310 +++$+++ BalanceRestored +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-20 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.184934240E09 +++$+++ You have deleted this article [[Sri Potuluri Veera Brahmendra Swami]] giving the reason ((WP:CSD#G12) Copyright violation. +++$+++ You have deleted this article [[Sri Potuluri Veera Brahmendra Swami]] giving the reason ((WP:CSD#G12) Copyright violation.[[User:BalanceRestored|BalanceRestored]] 05:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
540311 +++$+++ BalanceRestored +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540310 +++$+++ 540310 +++$+++ 2007-07-20 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.184938860E09 +++$+++ I've unknowing restored the article, I also provided the reference for the same. As per [[User:Thw1309|Thw1309]] I should not have restored the article it seems. Kindly look in to the same. +++$+++ :I've unknowing restored the article, I also provided the reference for the same. As per [[User:Thw1309|Thw1309]] I should not have restored the article it seems. Kindly look in to the same.[[User:BalanceRestored|BalanceRestored]] 06:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
540312 +++$+++ BalanceRestored +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540310 +++$+++ 540311 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.185288420E09 +++$+++ There are new users who are likely to be not aware of all the policies and also the copyright issue, they just see that wikipedia is free to edit, and copy paste things. This is what even I did at first when I was very new to wikipedia. But, again it is not a unfriendly thing either, they locate us with important references which we too may not be aware of. But again it is also an important thing to watch. I've added the article under my watch, I will keep a close check with things.  +++$+++ ::There are new users who are likely to be not aware of all the policies and also the copyright issue, they just see that wikipedia is free to edit, and copy paste things. This is what even I did at first when I was very new to wikipedia. But, again it is not a unfriendly thing either, they locate us with important references which we too may not be aware of. But again it is also an important thing to watch. I've added the article under my watch, I will keep a close check with things. [[User:BalanceRestored|BalanceRestored]] 07:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

16023 +++$+++ Pejman +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-23 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.279874040E09 +++$+++ Hi, How can I send an e-mail\/message to you? thanks, Pejman --[[User:Pejman|Pejman]] ([[User talk:Pejman|talk]]) 01:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)-- +++$+++ Hi, How can I send an e-mail/message to you? thanks, Pejman --[[User:Pejman|Pejman]] ([[User talk:Pejman|talk]]) 01:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)--[[User:Pejman|Pejman]] ([[User talk:Pejman|talk]]) 01:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
16024 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16023 +++$+++ 16023 +++$+++ 2010-07-23 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.279895520E09 +++$+++ Expand the \"Toolbox\" menu on the left-hand side and click on 'Email this user'. Regards,  +++$+++ : Expand the "Toolbox" menu on the left-hand side and click on 'Email this user'. Regards, [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] ([[User talk:Jvhertum#top|talk]]) 07:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

16025 +++$+++ AdeMiami +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16025 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-28 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.293583980E09 +++$+++ Hi! Thanks for tidying the photos in the article on Dom\xe8nech i Montaner. You might like to call back when I've added the rest of the translation from  the Catalan WP. Lots to do yet! Having finally finished translating [[Enric Sagnier]] I realized that Dom\xe8nech's article is disproportionately short in view of their relative importance.  +++$+++ Hi! Thanks for tidying the photos in the article on Domènech i Montaner. You might like to call back when I've added the rest of the translation from  the Catalan WP. Lots to do yet! Having finally finished translating [[Enric Sagnier]] I realized that Domènech's article is disproportionately short in view of their relative importance. [[User:AdeMiami|AdeMiami]] ([[User talk:AdeMiami|talk]]) 16:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
16026 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16025 +++$+++ 16025 +++$+++ 2010-12-28 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.293595260E09 +++$+++ No problem. Thanks for improving the article.  +++$+++ : No problem. Thanks for improving the article. [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] ([[User talk:Jvhertum#top|talk]]) 20:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

16027 +++$+++ GrahamHardy +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-20 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.295571120E09 +++$+++ Jvhertum, Last year you made this change :http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=A_Split-Second&action=historysubmit&diff=343316267&oldid=343252107 to the [[A Split-Second]] article with the justification that \"A is part of the name\". This does not appear to be a valid reason to exclude it ([[The Beatles]] has a DEFAULTSORT of Beatles despite 'The' being part of the name), your thoughts ?  +++$+++ Jvhertum, Last year you made this change :http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Split-Second&action=historysubmit&diff=343316267&oldid=343252107 to the [[A Split-Second]] article with the justification that "A is part of the name". This does not appear to be a valid reason to exclude it ([[The Beatles]] has a DEFAULTSORT of Beatles despite 'The' being part of the name), your thoughts ? [[User:GrahamHardy|GrahamHardy]] ([[User talk:GrahamHardy|talk]]) 16:52, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
16028 +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ Jvhertum +++$+++ 16027 +++$+++ 16027 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.295579040E09 +++$+++ I'm fine with sorting on the \"D\". Regards,  +++$+++ : I'm fine with sorting on the "D". Regards, [[User:Jvhertum|Jvhertum]] ([[User talk:Jvhertum#top|talk]]) 19:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

515547 +++$+++ Fences and windows +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-09 10:26:00 +++$+++ 1.252517160E09 +++$+++ '''An alternative''' to moving a page to an incubator would be calling a truce or hiatus in the <s>fighting<\/s> <s>voting<\/s> debating at AfD to allow editors to make edits to the article. This could even be routine in all deletions - perhaps three days after the nomination and before debate begins in which editors can make edits to improve the article, hopefully adding sources. As so many nominators fail to pay heed to [[WP:BEFORE]], this would allow others editors to do those checks and editing instead.  +++$+++ '''An alternative''' to moving a page to an incubator would be calling a truce or hiatus in the <s>fighting</s> <s>voting</s> debating at AfD to allow editors to make edits to the article. This could even be routine in all deletions - perhaps three days after the nomination and before debate begins in which editors can make edits to improve the article, hopefully adding sources. As so many nominators fail to pay heed to [[WP:BEFORE]], this would allow others editors to do those checks and editing instead. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="color:grey;">&amp;</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:black; color:white;">Windows</span>]] 10:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
515548 +++$+++ Ikip +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515547 +++$+++ 515547 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.252518720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Ikip|Ikip]] ([[User talk:Ikip|talk]]) 10:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
515549 +++$+++ Fritzpoll +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515547 +++$+++ 515548 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.252519560E09 +++$+++ How it would work is a challenge, as both of you point out.  One ideal would be for an objective criteria to be established, and pages tagged for incubation rather than deletion in the same way New Page Patrollers do CSD now.  Pages can then be moved to the incubator for work and assessment.  Incubation could be an alternative at the end of an AfD, but the ideal would be for it to be used to bypass discussion altogether.  Not only is this less bitey, but it reduces the current swamp of articles listed at AfD.  Ultimately, criteria also need to be established for removing articles from incubation, which will inevitably include hard-deletion.  It's all a tricky balance, especially as it seems we're to try running this in parallel to the existing deletion processes.  I suggest setting it up and presenting it as-is to WT:AfD to let them know it's there as a tool that can be used.  +++$+++ ::How it would work is a challenge, as both of you point out.  One ideal would be for an objective criteria to be established, and pages tagged for incubation rather than deletion in the same way New Page Patrollers do CSD now.  Pages can then be moved to the incubator for work and assessment.  Incubation could be an alternative at the end of an AfD, but the ideal would be for it to be used to bypass discussion altogether.  Not only is this less bitey, but it reduces the current swamp of articles listed at AfD.  Ultimately, criteria also need to be established for removing articles from incubation, which will inevitably include hard-deletion.  It's all a tricky balance, especially as it seems we're to try running this in parallel to the existing deletion processes.  I suggest setting it up and presenting it as-is to WT:AfD to let them know it's there as a tool that can be used. [[User:Fritzpoll|Fritzpoll]] ([[User talk:Fritzpoll|talk]]) 11:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

16031 +++$+++ Llonydd +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-07 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.262916960E09 +++$+++ Greetings once again, JorisvS! I have noticed that you have been restructuring some of the phonological charts I have been creating. I was just wondering why you are restructuring them in that way, why that order in the manner of articulation? Personally, I followed the layout put forth in [http:\/\/www.langsci.ucl.ac.uk\/ipa\/IPA_chart_(C)2005.pdf the International Phonetic Alphabet (2005)] as published by [[International Phonetic Association|the International Phonetic Association]], with slight changes, but if your order is based on something else, I would love to see it. Pure interest. --  +++$+++ Greetings once again, JorisvS! I have noticed that you have been restructuring some of the phonological charts I have been creating. I was just wondering why you are restructuring them in that way, why that order in the manner of articulation? Personally, I followed the layout put forth in [http://www.langsci.ucl.ac.uk/ipa/IPA_chart_(C)2005.pdf the International Phonetic Alphabet (2005)] as published by [[International Phonetic Association|the International Phonetic Association]], with slight changes, but if your order is based on something else, I would love to see it. Pure interest. -- [[User:Llonydd|Llonydd]] ([[User talk:Llonydd|talk]]) 18:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
16032 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16031 +++$+++ 16031 +++$+++ 2010-01-07 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.262917680E09 +++$+++ First, I'd like to mention that when the restructuring is complete, it will nearly have the layout given in that chart, much more than it has now or than it had. The reason I put the nasals above the plosives is that the plosives-affricates-fricatives make such a fitting order and the nasals are, like plosives, stops (also, it's good to notice that the affricates don't appear in the IPA chart at all). The tables on the [[Archi language]] and [[Avar language]] pages give examples of the endresult. -- +++$+++ :First, I'd like to mention that when the restructuring is complete, it will nearly have the layout given in that chart, much more than it has now or than it had. The reason I put the nasals above the plosives is that the plosives-affricates-fricatives make such a fitting order and the nasals are, like plosives, stops (also, it's good to notice that the affricates don't appear in the IPA chart at all). The tables on the [[Archi language]] and [[Avar language]] pages give examples of the endresult. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 18:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
16033 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16031 +++$+++ 16031 +++$+++ 2010-01-07 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.262934240E09 +++$+++ Well, not really. It seems both the old and to-be versions of the table follow the IPA chart just as much (or just as little, as the chart is very basic). The endresult will, however, be more in line with the typical consonant table I've come across here at Wikipedia, thus making it a little easier to interpret for people used to reading those tables. -- +++$+++ :Well, not really. It seems both the old and to-be versions of the table follow the IPA chart just as much (or just as little, as the chart is very basic). The endresult will, however, be more in line with the typical consonant table I've come across here at Wikipedia, thus making it a little easier to interpret for people used to reading those tables. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 23:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
16034 +++$+++ Llonydd +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16031 +++$+++ 16033 +++$+++ 2010-01-08 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.262958960E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your answer. But well, I really think there should be agreed upon one single standard here on Wikipedia. There are so many different orders, and some of the phonological charts also use very old terminology. --  +++$+++ ::Thank you for your answer. But well, I really think there should be agreed upon one single standard here on Wikipedia. There are so many different orders, and some of the phonological charts also use very old terminology. -- [[User:Llonydd|Llonydd]] ([[User talk:Llonydd|talk]]) 05:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
16035 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16031 +++$+++ 16034 +++$+++ 2010-01-08 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.262973180E09 +++$+++ Yes, quite a number of chart layouts can be found here. And that's why, at least every here and there, I've been bringing them in line with this 'typical' outline I showed you. And certainly, those old terminologies should go, they're rather bothersome\/confusing. You're welcome to help! -- +++$+++ :::Yes, quite a number of chart layouts can be found here. And that's why, at least every here and there, I've been bringing them in line with this 'typical' outline I showed you. And certainly, those old terminologies should go, they're rather bothersome/confusing. You're welcome to help! --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 09:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
16036 +++$+++ Aeusoes1 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16031 +++$+++ 16035 +++$+++ 2010-01-10 06:54:00 +++$+++ 1.263135240E09 +++$+++ In the past, I've also gone through Wikipedia articles to bring them in line with some standard or other.  In the process, I've met with occasional resistance in such a way that I don't believe we can have one rigidly imposed standard.  For example, I typically prefer nasals to be above plosives, though it may be more important to indicate their patterning with other sonorants.  At [[Swedish phonology]], the chart has approximants between plosives and fricatives presumably because it then allows a quick visual representation of voiced plosive lenition.  \u2014  +++$+++ ::::In the past, I've also gone through Wikipedia articles to bring them in line with some standard or other.  In the process, I've met with occasional resistance in such a way that I don't believe we can have one rigidly imposed standard.  For example, I typically prefer nasals to be above plosives, though it may be more important to indicate their patterning with other sonorants.  At [[Swedish phonology]], the chart has approximants between plosives and fricatives presumably because it then allows a quick visual representation of voiced plosive lenition.  — [[User:Aeusoes1|Æµ§œš¹]] <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">[[User talk:aeusoes1|<small><sub>[aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi]</sub></small>]]</span> 06:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
16037 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16031 +++$+++ 16036 +++$+++ 2010-01-10 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.263155340E09 +++$+++ Yes, in such cases this indeed seems better, as then such phenomena can then be indicated easily. We can't be rigid when pragmatics point to a somewhat different ordering. -- +++$+++ :::::Yes, in such cases this indeed seems better, as then such phenomena can then be indicated easily. We can't be rigid when pragmatics point to a somewhat different ordering. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 12:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

540320 +++$+++ Hosikawafuzi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-25 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.185428760E09 +++$+++ Why did you alter an edit I made to have a page deleted for valid reasons?  A typo is a valid reason a page should be deleted.  [[Asashikawa-Yoj\u014d Station]] is not needed and is incorrect.  It needs to be deleted, not redirected.   +++$+++ Why did you alter an edit I made to have a page deleted for valid reasons?  A typo is a valid reason a page should be deleted.  [[Asashikawa-Yojō Station]] is not needed and is incorrect.  It needs to be deleted, not redirected.  [[User:Hosikawafuzi|Hosikawafuzi]] 22:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
540321 +++$+++ Hosikawafuzi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540320 +++$+++ 540320 +++$+++ 2007-07-25 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.185430020E09 +++$+++ I don't think it's plausible unless you get cross-eyed like I did when I was making the article.  The correct reading of the name is \"Asahikawa\".  \"Asashi\" is not a correct reading at all for \u65ed.  Like I said, it's just a stupid typo from getting cross-eyed when I was typing.  If you wouldn't mind just getting rid of it, I would appreciate it.  Thanks.   +++$+++ :I don't think it's plausible unless you get cross-eyed like I did when I was making the article.  The correct reading of the name is "Asahikawa".  "Asashi" is not a correct reading at all for 旭.  Like I said, it's just a stupid typo from getting cross-eyed when I was typing.  If you wouldn't mind just getting rid of it, I would appreciate it.  Thanks.  [[User:Hosikawafuzi|Hosikawafuzi]] 23:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
540322 +++$+++ Hosikawafuzi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540320 +++$+++ 540321 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.185502080E09 +++$+++ Thanks much.   +++$+++ ::Thanks much.  [[User:Hosikawafuzi|Hosikawafuzi]] 19:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

278177 +++$+++ Booglamay +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-12 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.213339140E09 +++$+++ Hi there.  I've tagged the article [[Bingo Night Live]] - an article you've been working on - for a couple of reasons.  It appears that a substantial amount of the content has been copied word-for-word from a press release or similar document pertaining to this show.  This can either be seen as a [[WP:COPYVIO|copyright violation]], a [[WP:NPOV|biased point-of-view]], or both.  Please voice your opinions on the article's [[Talk:Bingo Night Live|talk page]].   +++$+++ Hi there.  I've tagged the article [[Bingo Night Live]] - an article you've been working on - for a couple of reasons.  It appears that a substantial amount of the content has been copied word-for-word from a press release or similar document pertaining to this show.  This can either be seen as a [[WP:COPYVIO|copyright violation]], a [[WP:NPOV|biased point-of-view]], or both.  Please voice your opinions on the article's [[Talk:Bingo Night Live|talk page]].  [[User:Booglamay|Booglamay]] ([[User talk:Booglamay|talk]]) 23:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
278178 +++$+++ Booglamay +++$+++ GMc +++$+++ 278177 +++$+++ 278177 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.213339320E09 +++$+++ Well.  I've just looked through your talk page archives, and all I can see is notifications for other copyright violations.  By the looks of things, you've been blocked '''three times''', and warned countless times.  Have a warning on me!   +++$+++ :Well.  I've just looked through your talk page archives, and all I can see is notifications for other copyright violations.  By the looks of things, you've been blocked '''three times''', and warned countless times.  Have a warning on me!  [[User:Booglamay|Booglamay]] ([[User talk:Booglamay|talk]]) 23:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

540323 +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540323 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-25 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.185430800E09 +++$+++ The creator says that it fits criteria #7 and #9 from WP:MUSIC.  #7 is thing you mentioned.  #9 is supposed to be from winning a few Battle of the Bands.  My gut says that the article would not survive an AFD, but he does have at least an assertion that he meets WP:MUSIC, so my call was that it wasn't valid for Speedy.  -  +++$+++ The creator says that it fits criteria #7 and #9 from WP:MUSIC.  #7 is thing you mentioned.  #9 is supposed to be from winning a few Battle of the Bands.  My gut says that the article would not survive an AFD, but he does have at least an assertion that he meets WP:MUSIC, so my call was that it wasn't valid for Speedy.  - [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] 23:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
540324 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540323 +++$+++ 540323 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.185494700E09 +++$+++ Au contraire, the list was designed to solicit users to contact those businesses, no different than list of shops in a mall.  +++$+++ *Au contraire, the list was designed to solicit users to contact those businesses, no different than list of shops in a mall. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 17:05, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

540325 +++$+++ KrakatoaKatie +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540325 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-26 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.185505140E09 +++$+++ By all means, fix it - I don't protect things often, and I think I messed it up. Would you do it correctly and leave me a little tutorial? I'd be grateful. Thanks! -  +++$+++ By all means, fix it - I don't protect things often, and I think I messed it up. Would you do it correctly and leave me a little tutorial? I'd be grateful. Thanks! - [[User:KrakatoaKatie|<font color="salmon">'''Krakatoa'''</font>]][[User talk:KrakatoaKatie|<font color="teal">Katie</font>]] 19:59, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
540326 +++$+++ KrakatoaKatie +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540325 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.185506100E09 +++$+++ I'm new too (June 8) and I'm discovering there are how-to pages that are either incomplete or outdated or just not right. Last night I was working with the [[WP:CP|copyright problems]], and the [[WP:CPAA|advice to admins page]] says to move cleared log pages (such as ([[Wikipedia:Copyright problems\/2007 July 15]] to [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems\/Log]], but that log page hasn't had a new entry since May 2006! I finally crawled through the history of WP:CP and saw that others are simply removing them from the main page but not logging them. Took me 30 minutes to figure it out, and it still doesn't feel quite right. We log the old AfD pages at [[Wikipedia:Archived delete debates]], so why don't we log the CPs anymore? I guess it's okay if we don't _delete_ the page, because we can still find it if we need it. This admin stuff is quite confusing. Thanks again, very much! -  +++$+++ ::I'm new too (June 8) and I'm discovering there are how-to pages that are either incomplete or outdated or just not right. Last night I was working with the [[WP:CP|copyright problems]], and the [[WP:CPAA|advice to admins page]] says to move cleared log pages (such as ([[Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2007 July 15]] to [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Log]], but that log page hasn't had a new entry since May 2006! I finally crawled through the history of WP:CP and saw that others are simply removing them from the main page but not logging them. Took me 30 minutes to figure it out, and it still doesn't feel quite right. We log the old AfD pages at [[Wikipedia:Archived delete debates]], so why don't we log the CPs anymore? I guess it's okay if we don't _delete_ the page, because we can still find it if we need it. This admin stuff is quite confusing. Thanks again, very much! - [[User:KrakatoaKatie|<font color="salmon">'''Krakatoa'''</font>]][[User talk:KrakatoaKatie|<font color="teal">Katie</font>]] 20:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
540327 +++$+++ KrakatoaKatie +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540325 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.185509280E09 +++$+++ The admin help and how-to pages aren't much help sometimes, and I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks so. That copyright advice page irks me the more I think about it. I'd change it, but I don't know how it should be changed. I'm not in the right frame of mind to create a solution to the overall problem of bad advice to new admins, but it's going to stew in my head. Some [[wp:bold|boldness]] is necessary, methinks. -  +++$+++ ::: The admin help and how-to pages aren't much help sometimes, and I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks so. That copyright advice page irks me the more I think about it. I'd change it, but I don't know how it should be changed. I'm not in the right frame of mind to create a solution to the overall problem of bad advice to new admins, but it's going to stew in my head. Some [[wp:bold|boldness]] is necessary, methinks. - [[User:KrakatoaKatie|<font color="salmon">'''Krakatoa'''</font>]][[User talk:KrakatoaKatie|<font color="teal">Katie</font>]] 21:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

16038 +++$+++ NawlinWiki +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-01 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.265080080E09 +++$+++ If it's a term that's basically been coined and defined by a single book, then it's likely a [[WP:NEO|neologism]], which isn't an appropriate subject for a Wikipedia article.  You would really need to provide sources showing that this term is in wider use beyond just the one book.   +++$+++ If it's a term that's basically been coined and defined by a single book, then it's likely a [[WP:NEO|neologism]], which isn't an appropriate subject for a Wikipedia article.  You would really need to provide sources showing that this term is in wider use beyond just the one book.  [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] ([[User talk:NawlinWiki|talk]]) 19:08, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
16039 +++$+++ NawlinWiki +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16038 +++$+++ 16038 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.265080320E09 +++$+++ See [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:N]].  +++$+++ :See [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:N]]. [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] ([[User talk:NawlinWiki|talk]]) 19:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

16040 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-01 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.265082660E09 +++$+++ So, a quick and scanty search points to an already much broader use of the term. So it might be best to give it at least the benefit of the doubt. I'll look more closely at it later.-- +++$+++ So, a quick and scanty search points to an already much broader use of the term. So it might be best to give it at least the benefit of the doubt. I'll look more closely at it later.--[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 19:51, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
16041 +++$+++ WikiDan61 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16040 +++$+++ 16040 +++$+++ 2010-02-02 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.265161260E09 +++$+++ Sorry if I'm jumping in the middle here, but I saw the discussion and thought I'd add my 2\xa2 worth.  A quick review of the links provided shows that the term \"administrative evil\" has been coined and promulgated by Adams and Balfour, the authors of the book cited in the article. Four of the six articles above relate directly to Adams in various publications and seminars. The other two links refer to reviews (and dismissals) of Adams' and Balfour's thesis.  I'm not sure this qualifies as giving the neologism \"widespread use\". <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ : Sorry if I'm jumping in the middle here, but I saw the discussion and thought I'd add my 2¢ worth.  A quick review of the links provided shows that the term "administrative evil" has been coined and promulgated by Adams and Balfour, the authors of the book cited in the article. Four of the six articles above relate directly to Adams in various publications and seminars. The other two links refer to reviews (and dismissals) of Adams' and Balfour's thesis.  I'm not sure this qualifies as giving the neologism "widespread use". <font color="green">[[User:WikiDan61|WikiDan61]]</font><font color="green" size="5px"></font><sup>[[User talk:WikiDan61|ChatMe!]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiDan61|ReadMe!!]]</sub> 17:41, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
16042 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16040 +++$+++ 16041 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.265225100E09 +++$+++ Also, I found the {{tl|notability}} tag. Couldn't this be a better tag, at least for the time being, per the text on [[WP:N]]? -- +++$+++ :: Also, I found the {{tl|notability}} tag. Couldn't this be a better tag, at least for the time being, per the text on [[WP:N]]? --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 11:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

570652 +++$+++ Debresser +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-15 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.237124640E09 +++$+++ First of all, thanks a lot for adding the documentation to the template and the explanation on the talk page. Please have another look at the suggestion I made after understanding your words.  +++$+++ First of all, thanks a lot for adding the documentation to the template and the explanation on the talk page. Please have another look at the suggestion I made after understanding your words. [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] ([[User talk:Debresser|talk]]) 06:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
570653 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570652 +++$+++ 570652 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.237149900E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 13:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

540331 +++$+++ Zigzig20s +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-26 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.185508380E09 +++$+++ Hi, would be interested in joining the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies|WikiProject LGBT Studies]]? I took a hint from your userpage. +++$+++ Hi, would be interested in joining the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies|WikiProject LGBT Studies]]? I took a hint from your userpage.[[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] 20:53, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
540332 +++$+++ Zigzig20s +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540331 +++$+++ 540331 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.185525000E09 +++$+++ Well, you may add yourself to the memberlist and add the Project box to your userpage, then have a look at the project watchlist perhaps, and try to improve LGBT-related pages. +++$+++ :Well, you may add yourself to the memberlist and add the Project box to your userpage, then have a look at the project watchlist perhaps, and try to improve LGBT-related pages.[[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] 01:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

16044 +++$+++ Calak1988 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-03 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.267671360E09 +++$+++ Thank you for cleaning this article, but Laki is not a language. According to Ethnologue and Britannica it is a subdialect of [[Kurdish language]]. -- +++$+++ Thank you for cleaning this article, but Laki is not a language. According to Ethnologue and Britannica it is a subdialect of [[Kurdish language]]. --[[User:Calak1988|Calak1988]] ([[User talk:Calak1988|talk]]) 18:56, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
16045 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16044 +++$+++ 16044 +++$+++ 2010-03-03 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.267688400E09 +++$+++ When we look at Ethnologue we can learn a bit more, though. It does not classify Laki as a dialect (let alone a subdialect) of Kurdish, merely as Kurdish. The difference is at first subtle: as Ethnologue does not explicitly state it to be a language or a dialect within Kurdish it could be either, but when we look at the other members of Kurdish that Ethnologue gives, we see those (Northern, Central, and Southern) classified as members of the macrolanguage Kurdish. Ethnologue only classifies languages as members of a macrolanguage when its members are typically considered (e.g. politically or socially) dialects of a unified language that, in fact, lack sufficient mutual intelligibility, and thus, scientifically, should be considered separate languages. -- +++$+++ :When we look at Ethnologue we can learn a bit more, though. It does not classify Laki as a dialect (let alone a subdialect) of Kurdish, merely as Kurdish. The difference is at first subtle: as Ethnologue does not explicitly state it to be a language or a dialect within Kurdish it could be either, but when we look at the other members of Kurdish that Ethnologue gives, we see those (Northern, Central, and Southern) classified as members of the macrolanguage Kurdish. Ethnologue only classifies languages as members of a macrolanguage when its members are typically considered (e.g. politically or socially) dialects of a unified language that, in fact, lack sufficient mutual intelligibility, and thus, scientifically, should be considered separate languages. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 23:40, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
16046 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16044 +++$+++ 16044 +++$+++ 2010-03-05 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.267825080E09 +++$+++ I must make one comment, though: Using a common origin as a reason for considering varieties dialects is bullshit, for then [[English language|English]], [[Russian language|Russian]], [[Greek language|Greek]], [[Persian language|Persian]], [[Hindi language|Hindi]], and of course [[Kurdish language|Kurdish]] itself should all be considered dialects of the same Indo-European language, which is, of course, nonsense. -- +++$+++ :I must make one comment, though: Using a common origin as a reason for considering varieties dialects is bullshit, for then [[English language|English]], [[Russian language|Russian]], [[Greek language|Greek]], [[Persian language|Persian]], [[Hindi language|Hindi]], and of course [[Kurdish language|Kurdish]] itself should all be considered dialects of the same Indo-European language, which is, of course, nonsense. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 13:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
16047 +++$+++ Calak1988 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16044 +++$+++ 16046 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.268600280E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your comment, dear. Good luck! -- +++$+++ ::Thank you for your comment, dear. Good luck! --[[User:Calak1988|Calak1988]] ([[User talk:Calak1988|talk]]) 13:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
16048 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16044 +++$+++ 16047 +++$+++ 2010-03-15 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.268677320E09 +++$+++ Not a problem, happy to help clarify things. -- +++$+++ :::Not a problem, happy to help clarify things. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 11:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

540335 +++$+++ Itaqallah +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540335 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-27 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.185522780E09 +++$+++ hello Carlossuarez46, you recently [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Muhammad%27s_Monsters closed] an AfD discussion on the book [[Muhammad's Monsters]] as no consensus. now, i'm not much of a fan of vote-counting (even though most !votes were delete, citing no evidence of notability), i believe there should be solid policy-\/guideline- based arguments behind a !vote. the only rationale behind the two Keep !votes was that the author was notable, and by extension any publication he writes must also be notable (which really isn't how our [[WP:Notability#General_notability_guideline|notability]] guidelines work). this argument was addressed in the AfD, that an individual's notability justifies an article on himself, not necessarily every publication of his: books should meet [[WP:BK]], thus being sufficiently notable to merit their own article. i was wondering if you could review the discussion again, as it may have been a simple error on your part. regards,  +++$+++ hello Carlossuarez46, you recently [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Muhammad%27s_Monsters closed] an AfD discussion on the book [[Muhammad's Monsters]] as no consensus. now, i'm not much of a fan of vote-counting (even though most !votes were delete, citing no evidence of notability), i believe there should be solid policy-/guideline- based arguments behind a !vote. the only rationale behind the two Keep !votes was that the author was notable, and by extension any publication he writes must also be notable (which really isn't how our [[WP:Notability#General_notability_guideline|notability]] guidelines work). this argument was addressed in the AfD, that an individual's notability justifies an article on himself, not necessarily every publication of his: books should meet [[WP:BK]], thus being sufficiently notable to merit their own article. i was wondering if you could review the discussion again, as it may have been a simple error on your part. regards, [[User:Itaqallah|<small><b><font color="#029DDD">ITAQALLAH</font></b></small>]] 00:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
540336 +++$+++ Itaqallah +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540335 +++$+++ 540335 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.185530340E09 +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Muhammad's Monsters}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Muhammad's Monsters]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.  +++$+++ :An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Muhammad's Monsters}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Muhammad's Monsters]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:Itaqallah|<small><b><font color="#029DDD">ITAQALLAH</font></b></small>]] 02:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

540337 +++$+++ Abdelkweli +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-27 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.185576840E09 +++$+++ First I would like to thank you for your involvment however you're not supposed to remove any deletion proposals before it's reviewed, please don't do it again it might be considered as vandalism. Second If you read clearly what I put as the deletion's reason, it had nothing to do with assertion of notability of the guy but with self-promotion in the article. Have you read the talk page? Do you really think a written, unisgned witness is enough? thanks  +++$+++ First I would like to thank you for your involvment however you're not supposed to remove any deletion proposals before it's reviewed, please don't do it again it might be considered as vandalism. Second If you read clearly what I put as the deletion's reason, it had nothing to do with assertion of notability of the guy but with self-promotion in the article. Have you read the talk page? Do you really think a written, unisgned witness is enough? thanks [[User:Abdelkweli|Abdelkweli]] 15:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
540338 +++$+++ Abdelkweli +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540337 +++$+++ 540337 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.185580680E09 +++$+++ At no time have I accused you of vandalism. Please read previous post again. Thanks.  +++$+++ :At no time have I accused you of vandalism. Please read previous post again. Thanks. [[User:Abdelkweli|Abdelkweli]] 16:58, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
540339 +++$+++ Abdelkweli +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540337 +++$+++ 540338 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.185581940E09 +++$+++ Again there is no accusation of vandalism, please don't feel special about it. I just thanked you for your participation but warned you that under wiki guideline you can't take a db off without proper explanation. You talked about assertion of notability when my db had nothing to do with notability but more with self-promotion. Thanks and have a good day. If you need any advices, feel free to contact me on my talk page.  +++$+++ ::Again there is no accusation of vandalism, please don't feel special about it. I just thanked you for your participation but warned you that under wiki guideline you can't take a db off without proper explanation. You talked about assertion of notability when my db had nothing to do with notability but more with self-promotion. Thanks and have a good day. If you need any advices, feel free to contact me on my talk page. [[User:Abdelkweli|Abdelkweli]] 17:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
540340 +++$+++ Abdelkweli +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540337 +++$+++ 540339 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.185584760E09 +++$+++ I don't want it gone and I don't think I should be the one making such decisions so that's why I decided as a form of consensus between yourself and myself to add the clean up and verification. Take care  +++$+++ ::: I don't want it gone and I don't think I should be the one making such decisions so that's why I decided as a form of consensus between yourself and myself to add the clean up and verification. Take care [[User:Abdelkweli|Abdelkweli]] 18:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

16051 +++$+++ Gantuya eng +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16051 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-07 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.273246860E09 +++$+++ You reverted my deletion of insignificant link from [[Standard Tibetan|Tibetan language]] article with an unfriendly comment. Please don't behave like that. It's not an issue of liking or not at all. If we add a link to every country where Tibetan is spoken, then we'll have to add India too.  +++$+++ You reverted my deletion of insignificant link from [[Standard Tibetan|Tibetan language]] article with an unfriendly comment. Please don't behave like that. It's not an issue of liking or not at all. If we add a link to every country where Tibetan is spoken, then we'll have to add India too. [[User:Gantuya eng|Gantuya eng]] ([[User talk:Gantuya eng|talk]]) 08:41, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
16052 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16051 +++$+++ 16051 +++$+++ 2010-05-07 09:17:00 +++$+++ 1.273249020E09 +++$+++ Please don't take such offense, that wasn't intended. Your first edit summary was rather opaque, and could've meant any number of things; for quite a number of people it may well be an issue of liking. If you have good reasons for removing it, no problem. But that is the question: is it really insignificant? Okay, it stands out, doesn't necessarily have to be bad; it wouldn't really stand out in the current version, though. I don't think clear inclusion criteria were used; adding also [[languages of Nepal]] and [[languages of India|India]] could be argued. Do you want to discuss it? -- +++$+++ :Please don't take such offense, that wasn't intended. Your first edit summary was rather opaque, and could've meant any number of things; for quite a number of people it may well be an issue of liking. If you have good reasons for removing it, no problem. But that is the question: is it really insignificant? Okay, it stands out, doesn't necessarily have to be bad; it wouldn't really stand out in the current version, though. I don't think clear inclusion criteria were used; adding also [[languages of Nepal]] and [[languages of India|India]] could be argued. Do you want to discuss it? --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 09:17, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

16053 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-10 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.273538640E09 +++$+++ You might be interested to keep an eye on [[South Slavic languages]] as well. Same issue with deleting SC going on there. \u2014  +++$+++ You might be interested to keep an eye on [[South Slavic languages]] as well. Same issue with deleting SC going on there. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 17:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
16054 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16053 +++$+++ 16053 +++$+++ 2010-05-10 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.273543320E09 +++$+++ Done. Thanks for pointing out. -- +++$+++ :Done. Thanks for pointing out. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 19:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

16055 +++$+++ Addshore +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16055 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-18 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.274234280E09 +++$+++ Just a quick note, can you make sure you subst welcome templates when you add them to a users talk page? Thanks =] ''' +++$+++ Just a quick note, can you make sure you subst welcome templates when you add them to a users talk page? Thanks =] '''[[User:Addshore|<span style="color:black;">·Add§hore·</span>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Addshore|<span style="color:black;">T<small>alk</small> T<small>o</small> M<small>e</small>!</span>]]</sup></span> 18:58, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
16056 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16055 +++$+++ 16055 +++$+++ 2010-05-18 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.274237340E09 +++$+++ I wasn't aware of its \"special way\". No problem next time. -- +++$+++ :I wasn't aware of its "special way". No problem next time. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 19:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

16057 +++$+++ Capsot +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-10 10:17:00 +++$+++ 1.276190220E09 +++$+++ Hello, I hope you are doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. I have just read your profile and you seem a very learned person and interested in (small) languages and cultures so maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... I'm a member of an association \"Amical de la Viquip\xe8dia\" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this has not been approved up to this moment because it does not belong to one state. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: [[Template:Wikimedia CAT|Wikimedia CAT]]. Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care!  +++$+++ Hello, I hope you are doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. I have just read your profile and you seem a very learned person and interested in (small) languages and cultures so maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... I'm a member of an association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this has not been approved up to this moment because it does not belong to one state. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: [[Template:Wikimedia CAT|Wikimedia CAT]]. Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care! [[User:Capsot|Capsot]] ([[User talk:Capsot|talk]]) 10:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
16058 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16057 +++$+++ 16057 +++$+++ 2010-07-09 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.278715500E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 15:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
16059 +++$+++ Capsot +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16057 +++$+++ 16058 +++$+++ 2010-07-20 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.279635600E09 +++$+++ Well, thanks a lot, if you ever need something from me about Occitan, Catalan or else, just let me know I'll be glad to help the best I can, best regards! Claudi Balaguer\/ +++$+++ :: Well, thanks a lot, if you ever need something from me about Occitan, Catalan or else, just let me know I'll be glad to help the best I can, best regards! Claudi Balaguer/[[User:Capsot|Capsot]] ([[User talk:Capsot|talk]]) 07:20, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

540347 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-29 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.185703740E09 +++$+++ Why would you want the redirect deleted? Just curious, I'll do it if you'd like, just re-confirm because normally redirects with only chnages of capitalization are encouraged.  +++$+++ Why would you want the redirect deleted? Just curious, I'll do it if you'd like, just re-confirm because normally redirects with only chnages of capitalization are encouraged. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 03:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
540348 +++$+++ Navou +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540347 +++$+++ 540347 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.185703920E09 +++$+++ Just a personal preference really, I'll usually add a name variation after a few days if an article I create persists, if I add a redirect.  Only a preference really.  I will not re add the csd template, i'll leave the decision to you.  Cheers!  +++$+++ :Just a personal preference really, I'll usually add a name variation after a few days if an article I create persists, if I add a redirect.  Only a preference really.  I will not re add the csd template, i'll leave the decision to you.  Cheers! [[User:Navou|Navou]] <sup> [[User talk:Navou|banter]] </sup> 03:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

16061 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-09 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.278731940E09 +++$+++ Just a heads-up for [[Croatian grammar]]. Several-month-long discussion on merging this with [[Serbian grammar]] and [[Serbian and Croatian grammar]]\/[[Serbo-Croatian grammar]] (the latter probably best because Bosnian and Montenegrin redirect there too), with notices given at the languages wikiproject. However, [[Croatian grammar]] keeps getting reverted into a content fork, with the argument that it isn't a fork if you give it a different name. I made a stub of what I thought it would be that wouldn't be a fork, but that gets reverted too. I don't really care, though, if it's s.t. along those lines (itself really just a sop and probably mergeable into Croatian language) or a rd. as people had originally agreed. \u2014  +++$+++ Just a heads-up for [[Croatian grammar]]. Several-month-long discussion on merging this with [[Serbian grammar]] and [[Serbian and Croatian grammar]]/[[Serbo-Croatian grammar]] (the latter probably best because Bosnian and Montenegrin redirect there too), with notices given at the languages wikiproject. However, [[Croatian grammar]] keeps getting reverted into a content fork, with the argument that it isn't a fork if you give it a different name. I made a stub of what I thought it would be that wouldn't be a fork, but that gets reverted too. I don't really care, though, if it's s.t. along those lines (itself really just a sop and probably mergeable into Croatian language) or a rd. as people had originally agreed. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 20:19, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
16062 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16061 +++$+++ 16061 +++$+++ 2010-07-10 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.278799620E09 +++$+++ All right, but, ehm, what do you like me to do? -- +++$+++ :All right, but, ehm, what do you like me to do? --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 15:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
16063 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16061 +++$+++ 16062 +++$+++ 2010-07-10 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.278820500E09 +++$+++ Whatever you think is appropriate. IMO, the more reasonable voices the better. I've gone back to making it a redirect, as my attempts at creating a non-forked article have been rejected, but there may be other decent approaches. \u2014  +++$+++ ::Whatever you think is appropriate. IMO, the more reasonable voices the better. I've gone back to making it a redirect, as my attempts at creating a non-forked article have been rejected, but there may be other decent approaches. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 20:55, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

540350 +++$+++ Axem Titanium +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-29 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.185706560E09 +++$+++ No, it hasn't been discussed but a cursory glance at the other uses reveals that 1) the James Bond character was the first recorded usage of the name, 2) the other uses are obviously derived from the James Bond character, else an extremely unlikely coincidence and 3) the James Bond character is the most well-known of all uses. Thus, I felt it was a \"non-controversial move\" and CSD#G6'd it.  +++$+++ No, it hasn't been discussed but a cursory glance at the other uses reveals that 1) the James Bond character was the first recorded usage of the name, 2) the other uses are obviously derived from the James Bond character, else an extremely unlikely coincidence and 3) the James Bond character is the most well-known of all uses. Thus, I felt it was a "non-controversial move" and CSD#G6'd it. [[User:Axem Titanium|Axem Titanium]] 03:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
540351 +++$+++ Axem Titanium +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540350 +++$+++ 540350 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.185707340E09 +++$+++ Yeah, someone else already deleted so I just went ahead and moved it. It looks like you've been recently handed the \"admin mop\", as they say. A tip for the future, try not to think too hard if you're patrolling [[CAT:CSD]]; just make a judgment call and if no one complains, you're golden. It's called \"speedy\" for a reason. ^_^  +++$+++ :Yeah, someone else already deleted so I just went ahead and moved it. It looks like you've been recently handed the "admin mop", as they say. A tip for the future, try not to think too hard if you're patrolling [[CAT:CSD]]; just make a judgment call and if no one complains, you're golden. It's called "speedy" for a reason. ^_^ [[User:Axem Titanium|Axem Titanium]] 04:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
540352 +++$+++ Axem Titanium +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540350 +++$+++ 540351 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.185707700E09 +++$+++ Yeah. I hope I didn't sound to pedagogical. Anyway, you're doing a great job. Keep it up.  +++$+++ ::Yeah. I hope I didn't sound to pedagogical. Anyway, you're doing a great job. Keep it up. [[User:Axem Titanium|Axem Titanium]] 04:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
540353 +++$+++ Arcade123 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540350 +++$+++ 540350 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.185715560E09 +++$+++ Woops realized I forgot to sign, thanks for that :) Thanks for the information, explains loads!  +++$+++ :Woops realized I forgot to sign, thanks for that :) Thanks for the information, explains loads! [[User:Arcade123|Arcade123]] 06:26, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

16064 +++$+++ Michael Romanov +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16064 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-25 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.280044080E09 +++$+++ Can you translate a short phrase into English for me, please? It [http:\/\/www.stamp2.com\/articles\/cinderella\/cinderella18.asp says] ''''Breiz da Virviken Bretagne''''. I am going to use it in an article about Breton philately. Thank you, -- +++$+++ Can you translate a short phrase into English for me, please? It [http://www.stamp2.com/articles/cinderella/cinderella18.asp says] ''''Breiz da Virviken Bretagne''''. I am going to use it in an article about Breton philately. Thank you, --[[User:Michael Romanov|Michael Romanov]] ([[User talk:Michael Romanov|talk]]) 00:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
16065 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16064 +++$+++ 16064 +++$+++ 2010-07-29 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.280422680E09 +++$+++ How come you ask me? I don't speak Breton, nor have I implied such anywhere. -- +++$+++ :How come you ask me? I don't speak Breton, nor have I implied such anywhere. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 09:58, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
16066 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16064 +++$+++ 16064 +++$+++ 2010-07-29 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.280472720E09 +++$+++ I believe ''Breiz da Virviken'' is \"Brittany for Ever\". The root is ''birviken'' (or just ''biken''); the ''b'' &rarr; ''v'' after ''da'' \"to\". ''Bretagne'' is just French. \u2014  +++$+++ :I believe ''Breiz da Virviken'' is "Brittany for Ever". The root is ''birviken'' (or just ''biken''); the ''b'' &rarr; ''v'' after ''da'' "to". ''Bretagne'' is just French. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 23:52, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
16067 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16064 +++$+++ 16066 +++$+++ 2010-07-30 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.280513040E09 +++$+++ I couldn't find ''birviken'' at Wiktionary; I'm wondering though, Wiktionary says that ''biken'' means \"never\". -- +++$+++ ::I couldn't find ''birviken'' at Wiktionary; I'm wondering though, Wiktionary says that ''biken'' means "never". --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 11:04, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
16068 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16064 +++$+++ 16067 +++$+++ 2010-07-30 11:23:00 +++$+++ 1.280514180E09 +++$+++ Yeah, literally \"until never\" = forever, like French ''\xe0 jamais''. \u2014  +++$+++ :::Yeah, literally "until never" = forever, like French ''à jamais''. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 11:23, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
16069 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16064 +++$+++ 16068 +++$+++ 2010-07-30 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.280514300E09 +++$+++ Right...-- +++$+++ ::::Right...--[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 11:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
16070 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16064 +++$+++ 16069 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.282727640E09 +++$+++ (I think that's just due to English having contracted ''ne'' (not) ''ever'' into ''never'', whereas that hasn't happened in French, and I suspect in Breton, so that ''biken \/ jamais'' \"ever\" is colloquially used without the \"not\" to mean \"never\", and dictionaries commonly translate it that way. Doesn't correspond to English too well either way.) \u2014  +++$+++ :::::(I think that's just due to English having contracted ''ne'' (not) ''ever'' into ''never'', whereas that hasn't happened in French, and I suspect in Breton, so that ''biken / jamais'' "ever" is colloquially used without the "not" to mean "never", and dictionaries commonly translate it that way. Doesn't correspond to English too well either way.) — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 02:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

526966 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526966 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-17 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.200573180E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 04:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
526967 +++$+++  +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526966 +++$+++ 526966 +++$+++ 2008-01-17 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.200574080E09 +++$+++ Please feel free to delete this orphaned image that was uploaded in 2005. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Please feel free to delete this orphaned image that was uploaded in 2005. &mdash; [[User:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|{{{User|ERcheck}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|ERcheck}}}|talk]]) 04:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

16071 +++$+++ Alaquwel +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16071 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-29 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.280413200E09 +++$+++ I'll apologize in advance if this seems overly-detailed, but it is important to accurately represent the language. And I do appreciate all the help in cleaning things up and making the article look just spectacular. I would like to include orthographic symbols next to the IPA characters, and would very much welcome help with that if you would like to assist further on the article.  +++$+++ I'll apologize in advance if this seems overly-detailed, but it is important to accurately represent the language. And I do appreciate all the help in cleaning things up and making the article look just spectacular. I would like to include orthographic symbols next to the IPA characters, and would very much welcome help with that if you would like to assist further on the article. [[User:Alaquwel|Alaquwel]] ([[User talk:Alaquwel|talk]]) 07:20, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
16072 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16071 +++$+++ 16071 +++$+++ 2010-07-29 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.280423040E09 +++$+++ Question: why are they so distinct when there is no contrast between sounds of these two different articulatory places? -- +++$+++ :Question: why are they so distinct when there is no contrast between sounds of these two different articulatory places? --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 10:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
16073 +++$+++ Alaquwel +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16071 +++$+++ 16072 +++$+++ 2010-07-30 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.280483700E09 +++$+++ First, because the difference between a palatal fricative and a post-alveolar one is audibly different. Take for example English: while we have no phonemic palatal fricative no linguist (or very few) will argue that a palatal fricative and the post-alveolar are interchangeable in the language.  Second, because the velar fricative can have realizations that range from the palatal to the uvular in Venture\xf1o. If there were a palatal realization of a fricative in Venture\xf1o, it would be an allophone of the velar fricative, not the post-alveolar. Along those lines, if the reasoning between combining post-alveolar and palatal places or articulation is one of economy, then I'm not sure how one could tell whether to combine those two places or articulation, or the palatal and velar places of articulation. There are other reasons to separate the two places of articulation, such as considering the interplay between alveolar and post-alveolar positions of articulation in sibilant harmony, but these reasons are more complex. Finally, I think it's also worth considering that Drs. Kathryn Klar, Suzanne Wash, Tsuyoshi Ono, Richard Applegate, Kenneth Whistler, and Marianne Mithun all treat the post-alveolar and palatal places of articulation as non-interchangable. I hope you can see that much thought from multiple, very qualified linguists has gone into why the palatal position should stand on its own.  +++$+++ ::First, because the difference between a palatal fricative and a post-alveolar one is audibly different. Take for example English: while we have no phonemic palatal fricative no linguist (or very few) will argue that a palatal fricative and the post-alveolar are interchangeable in the language.  Second, because the velar fricative can have realizations that range from the palatal to the uvular in Ventureño. If there were a palatal realization of a fricative in Ventureño, it would be an allophone of the velar fricative, not the post-alveolar. Along those lines, if the reasoning between combining post-alveolar and palatal places or articulation is one of economy, then I'm not sure how one could tell whether to combine those two places or articulation, or the palatal and velar places of articulation. There are other reasons to separate the two places of articulation, such as considering the interplay between alveolar and post-alveolar positions of articulation in sibilant harmony, but these reasons are more complex. Finally, I think it's also worth considering that Drs. Kathryn Klar, Suzanne Wash, Tsuyoshi Ono, Richard Applegate, Kenneth Whistler, and Marianne Mithun all treat the post-alveolar and palatal places of articulation as non-interchangable. I hope you can see that much thought from multiple, very qualified linguists has gone into why the palatal position should stand on its own. [[User:Alaquwel|Alaquwel]] ([[User talk:Alaquwel|talk]]) 02:55, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
16074 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16071 +++$+++ 16073 +++$+++ 2010-07-30 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.280512800E09 +++$+++ Please, tell me more about these more complex reasons. -- +++$+++ :::Please, tell me more about these more complex reasons. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 11:00, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

16075 +++$+++ Deseretian +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16075 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-22 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.285204140E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Deseretian|Deseretian]] ([[User talk:Deseretian|talk]]) 18:09, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
16076 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16075 +++$+++ 16075 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.285269360E09 +++$+++ Furthermore, concise presentation is not, in and by itself, [[WP:OR|OR]]. If some author very lengthily explains something there is no need for us to do the same here, we merely shouldn't draw conclusions or make inferences the author(s) do(es)n't (which I haven't). -- +++$+++ :Furthermore, concise presentation is not, in and by itself, [[WP:OR|OR]]. If some author very lengthily explains something there is no need for us to do the same here, we merely shouldn't draw conclusions or make inferences the author(s) do(es)n't (which I haven't). --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 12:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
16077 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16075 +++$+++ 16075 +++$+++ 2010-09-30 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.285913460E09 +++$+++ \"'Parsimony is central to science' is largely meaningless\". Would you care to elaborate on your thoughts behind this? -- +++$+++ :"'Parsimony is central to science' is largely meaningless". Would you care to elaborate on your thoughts behind this? --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 23:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

16079 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16079 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-24 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.282716000E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose, at their own discretion, [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|sanctions]] on any editor working on pages broadly related to the [[Balkans]] if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], any expected [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standards of behavior]], or any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Macedonia#Final decision]]. <!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose, at their own discretion, [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|sanctions]] on any editor working on pages broadly related to the [[Balkans]] if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], any expected [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standards of behavior]], or any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Final decision]]. <!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 23:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
16080 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16079 +++$+++ 16079 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.282724880E09 +++$+++ Just my two bits for anyone reading, Jorisv has been a breath of sanity in some rather contentious debates. \u2014  +++$+++ :Just my two bits for anyone reading, Jorisv has been a breath of sanity in some rather contentious debates. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 01:28, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
16081 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16079 +++$+++ 16080 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.282725000E09 +++$+++ I hate that the template says \"Further inappropriate behaviour\", as sometimes these notices are left without actually accusing anyone of wrongdoing.  +++$+++ ::I hate that the template says "Further inappropriate behaviour", as sometimes these notices are left without actually accusing anyone of wrongdoing. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 01:30, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

264824 +++$+++ Imars +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264824 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-26 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.219755660E09 +++$+++ Howdy! Thank you for your recent rating of the article [[Walchensee]]. Unfortunately you did not leave any comments as to why you rated it a start and what could stand improving. I find it interesting that the corresponding [[de:Walchensee|German article]], of which this is a translation, was added to the list of [http:\/\/de.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Exzellente_Artikel exzellenter Artikel]. (Please do not take this as a criticism of your rating. I only find it interesting the difference in the quality requirements between the English and German Wikipedias. For instance I have noticed that the German Wikipedia community does not demand references the same way the English Wikipedia community does.) During my translation of the article I came across a number of places where I would have done the article differently, had I done it myself. I would be curious to know what you would have wanted in order to give the article a higher rating. Thanks in advance for your comments. -- +++$+++ Howdy! Thank you for your recent rating of the article [[Walchensee]]. Unfortunately you did not leave any comments as to why you rated it a start and what could stand improving. I find it interesting that the corresponding [[de:Walchensee|German article]], of which this is a translation, was added to the list of [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Exzellente_Artikel exzellenter Artikel]. (Please do not take this as a criticism of your rating. I only find it interesting the difference in the quality requirements between the English and German Wikipedias. For instance I have noticed that the German Wikipedia community does not demand references the same way the English Wikipedia community does.) During my translation of the article I came across a number of places where I would have done the article differently, had I done it myself. I would be curious to know what you would have wanted in order to give the article a higher rating. Thanks in advance for your comments. --[[User:Imars|imars]] ([[User talk:Imars|talk]]) 06:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
264825 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264824 +++$+++ 264824 +++$+++ 2008-08-26 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.219793400E09 +++$+++ Hope this clears things up a bit. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hope this clears things up a bit. Cheers, [[User:Ekki01|Ekki01]] ([[User talk:Ekki01#top|talk]]) 16:30, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
264826 +++$+++ Imars +++$+++ Ekki01 +++$+++ 264824 +++$+++ 264825 +++$+++ 2008-08-27 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.219844220E09 +++$+++ Hi Ekki01. I do not like to include the citations\/reference from the original article as these are unreliable or heresay unless one checks the source themself. That's why I leave the only reference as the translation link. But as you say there is nothing that stops us from improving the article. I'll see what I can do. Thanks very much for your reply!  +++$+++ ::Hi Ekki01. I do not like to include the citations/reference from the original article as these are unreliable or heresay unless one checks the source themself. That's why I leave the only reference as the translation link. But as you say there is nothing that stops us from improving the article. I'll see what I can do. Thanks very much for your reply! [[User:Imars|imars]] ([[User talk:Imars|talk]]) 06:37, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

16082 +++$+++ Inka 888 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-30 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.283231760E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}<\/code> to '''the top of [[:Chamalal people|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or \"db\" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Chamalal people|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontext-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <font color=\"#228b22\"> +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Chamalal people|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Chamalal people|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontext-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <font color="#228b22">[[User:Inka 888|Inka]]</font> <sup>[[User talk:Inka 888|888]]</sup> 22:16, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
16083 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16082 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-30 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.283233320E09 +++$+++ The article now has more context, so no longer qualifies under [[WP:CSD#A1]]. -- +++$+++ ::The article now has more context, so no longer qualifies under [[WP:CSD#A1]]. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 22:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

16084 +++$+++ TaalVerbeteraar +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-02 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.283471340E09 +++$+++ Please learn [http:\/\/woordenlijst.org\/leidraad\/6\/3\/#r6e the rules] before incorrectly [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Limburg_%28Netherlands%29&action=historysubmit&diff=362609475&oldid=362248536 marking something as 'incorrect']... -  +++$+++ Please learn [http://woordenlijst.org/leidraad/6/3/#r6e the rules] before incorrectly [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Limburg_%28Netherlands%29&action=historysubmit&diff=362609475&oldid=362248536 marking something as 'incorrect']... - [[User:TaalVerbeteraar|TaalVerbeteraar]] ([[User talk:TaalVerbeteraar|talk]]) 16:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
16085 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16084 +++$+++ 16084 +++$+++ 2010-09-02 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.283480760E09 +++$+++ It seems I misread it back then. Anyway, a little friendlier notice would be much appreciated (or, well, something that cannot be (mis)construed as offhand); remember we're only human... As a sidenote, notice the ''space'' that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Limburg_(Netherlands)&action=historysubmit&diff=382530782&oldid=382504973 shouldn't have been there] (which, when I think about it, may well have been the reason I misread it)? -- +++$+++ :It seems I misread it back then. Anyway, a little friendlier notice would be much appreciated (or, well, something that cannot be (mis)construed as offhand); remember we're only human... As a sidenote, notice the ''space'' that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Limburg_(Netherlands)&action=historysubmit&diff=382530782&oldid=382504973 shouldn't have been there] (which, when I think about it, may well have been the reason I misread it)? --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 19:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

16086 +++$+++ Chipmunkdavis +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16086 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-11 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.284236880E09 +++$+++ I noticed in this edit on [[Slavic languages]] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Slavic_languages&action=historysubmit&diff=381780906&oldid=381633546] that you changed the word \"neighbouring\" to \"neighboring\". Was this done for a specific reason? As far as I know, this stuff shouldn't be changed from what was already there, but please educate me on the style guide if I am wrong!  +++$+++ I noticed in this edit on [[Slavic languages]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Slavic_languages&action=historysubmit&diff=381780906&oldid=381633546] that you changed the word "neighbouring" to "neighboring". Was this done for a specific reason? As far as I know, this stuff shouldn't be changed from what was already there, but please educate me on the style guide if I am wrong! [[User:Chipmunkdavis|Chipmunkdavis]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 13:28, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
16087 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16086 +++$+++ 16086 +++$+++ 2010-09-11 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.284237600E09 +++$+++ Yes, mere consistency: the rest (of the section at least) already used \"neighboring\". -- +++$+++ :Yes, mere consistency: the rest (of the section at least) already used "neighboring". --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 13:40, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
16088 +++$+++ Chipmunkdavis +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16086 +++$+++ 16087 +++$+++ 2010-09-11 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.284239280E09 +++$+++ Okay, got it! I wonder how they ended up different. The original usage should be the one currently used right? Anyway, on another note, could you quickly elucidate on how Serbian\/Croatian are considered one language, but Macedonian\/Bulgarian are not? I always thought they had the same similarities.  +++$+++ ::Okay, got it! I wonder how they ended up different. The original usage should be the one currently used right? Anyway, on another note, could you quickly elucidate on how Serbian/Croatian are considered one language, but Macedonian/Bulgarian are not? I always thought they had the same similarities. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|Chipmunkdavis]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 14:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
16089 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16086 +++$+++ 16088 +++$+++ 2010-09-11 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.284246240E09 +++$+++ Well, as far as I know, the differences between standard Macedonian and Bulgarian are considerably larger than those between the various standards of Serbo-Croatian; all SC standards being based on the same (sub)dialect, while Macedonian and Bulgarian are based on different dialects. This would make the differences between Macedonian and Bulgarian more comparable to those between \u0160tokavian and e.g. \u010cakavian. Were standard Croatian based not on \u0160tokavian but on \u010cakavian, I think most people would accept Croatian and Serbian as being different languages. I know that Macedonian and Bulgarian are often claimed to be mutually intelligible, but I have yet to see anything more substantial about this than the mere claim. In general, claims of mutual intelligibility often vary, sometimes even being based on rough recognizability or something, making me quite skeptical of such mere, unsubstantiated claims. -- +++$+++ :::Well, as far as I know, the differences between standard Macedonian and Bulgarian are considerably larger than those between the various standards of Serbo-Croatian; all SC standards being based on the same (sub)dialect, while Macedonian and Bulgarian are based on different dialects. This would make the differences between Macedonian and Bulgarian more comparable to those between Štokavian and e.g. Čakavian. Were standard Croatian based not on Štokavian but on Čakavian, I think most people would accept Croatian and Serbian as being different languages. I know that Macedonian and Bulgarian are often claimed to be mutually intelligible, but I have yet to see anything more substantial about this than the mere claim. In general, claims of mutual intelligibility often vary, sometimes even being based on rough recognizability or something, making me quite skeptical of such mere, unsubstantiated claims. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 16:04, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

570660 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-15 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.237115700E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Imbox license.svg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Imbox license (1).svg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Imbox license (1).svg]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:File:Imbox license.svg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Imbox license (1).svg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Imbox license (1).svg]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 04:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
570661 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570660 +++$+++ 570660 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.237118700E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 05:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

16090 +++$+++ Cezarika1 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16090 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-15 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.284554760E09 +++$+++ Please, translate this text: \u0536\u0575\u056b\u0577\u0561\u057f\u0561\u056f \u0531\u0566\u056b\u0566 \u057f\u056b\u056f\u0576\u0578\u057b\u0564\u0561\u0582 \u0539\u056b\u056c\u0578\u0582\u057d\u056b\u056f \u056f\u0578\u0575\u056c\u0561\u0582\u0565\u0561\u0576 \u056e\u0576\u0578\u0582\u0576\u0564 \u0574\u0570\u056b \u057a\u0561\u0572\u057f\u0561\u057d\u0561\u0580\u056b \u0561\u0574\u0578\u0582\u057d\u0576\u0561\u0581\u0565\u0561\u056c'\u056b \u054a\u0585\u0569\u0577\u0561\u0576 \u0568\u0576\u056f\u0561\u055b\u056c\u0578\u055b\u057e \u057f\u0567\u0580 \u0565\u056f\u0565\u0572\u0565\u0581\u056b \u0584\u0578 \u0570\u0578\u0574\u0578\u0580\u056b \u0576\u0578\u0580\u0561\u0583\u0561\u0575\u056c.  +++$+++ Please, translate this text: Զյիշատակ Ազիզ տիկնոջդաւ Թիլուսիկ կոյլաւեան ծնունդ մհի պաղտասարի ամուսնացեալ'ի Պօթշան ընկա՛լո՛վ տէր եկեղեցի քո հոմորի նորափայլ. [[User:Cezarika1|Cezarika1]] ([[User talk:Cezarika1|talk]]) 05:46, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
16091 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16090 +++$+++ 16090 +++$+++ 2010-09-15 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.284595140E09 +++$+++ Why do you ask me? The best I can do is see that it's Armenian. Nowhere I have implied I speak Armenian. -- +++$+++ :Why do you ask me? The best I can do is see that it's Armenian. Nowhere I have implied I speak Armenian. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 16:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

483279 +++$+++ Taborlechner +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483279 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-18 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.190102400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help on cleaning up the vandalism to [[MidSun Junior High School]].   +++$+++ Thanks for your help on cleaning up the vandalism to [[MidSun Junior High School]].  [[User:Taborlechner|Tabor]] 01:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
483280 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483279 +++$+++ 483279 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.190102580E09 +++$+++ My pleasure.  All of the offending users have been permanently blocked.  \u2014 +++$+++ :My pleasure.  All of the offending users have been permanently blocked.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 01:03, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

16092 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-04 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.286212920E09 +++$+++ I'd be a bit careful of 3RR at Croatian, given the history of some of the editors. Esp. if no-one's accepted the edit. There are a couple others of us who can take up the slack, and if it keeps up for long we can notify ARBMAC. \u2014  +++$+++ I'd be a bit careful of 3RR at Croatian, given the history of some of the editors. Esp. if no-one's accepted the edit. There are a couple others of us who can take up the slack, and if it keeps up for long we can notify ARBMAC. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 10:22, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
16093 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16092 +++$+++ 16092 +++$+++ 2010-10-04 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.286213400E09 +++$+++ Yes, I kept 3RR in mind, though yes, it could indeed be a good idea to wait as long as it's not yet accepted by someone. Let's see where it goes this time. -- +++$+++ :Yes, I kept 3RR in mind, though yes, it could indeed be a good idea to wait as long as it's not yet accepted by someone. Let's see where it goes this time. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 10:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
16094 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16092 +++$+++ 16093 +++$+++ 2010-10-04 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.286213640E09 +++$+++ PS. Love the translation requests. I have some Kalaallisut maybe you could take care of for me? \u2014  +++$+++ ::PS. Love the translation requests. I have some Kalaallisut maybe you could take care of for me? — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 10:34, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

540382 +++$+++ GlassFET +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540382 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-31 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.185921240E09 +++$+++ That was not a request for the article to be deleted. That was a request for an admin to merge the article history which was separated from the article by a cut and paste move. Please don't interfere with these housekeeping operations if you don't understand them. It is a violation of the GFDL for the article to be cut and paste moved and lose the history of who contributed to it. The history merge will be done by the responding admin as part of the operation. Please don't remove the tag again.  +++$+++ That was not a request for the article to be deleted. That was a request for an admin to merge the article history which was separated from the article by a cut and paste move. Please don't interfere with these housekeeping operations if you don't understand them. It is a violation of the GFDL for the article to be cut and paste moved and lose the history of who contributed to it. The history merge will be done by the responding admin as part of the operation. Please don't remove the tag again. [[User talk:GlassFET|GlassFET]] 15:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
540383 +++$+++ GlassFET +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540382 +++$+++ 540382 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.185928080E09 +++$+++ As I've stated both on the talk page of the article and on the cut\/paste repair board, the history is that the article was deleted, restored to user space, edited by that user, and then cut and pasted by another user from that version. If you aren't going to fix it, let somebody else do it.  +++$+++ :As I've stated both on the talk page of the article and on the cut/paste repair board, the history is that the article was deleted, restored to user space, edited by that user, and then cut and pasted by another user from that version. If you aren't going to fix it, let somebody else do it. [[User talk:GlassFET|GlassFET]] 17:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
540384 +++$+++ GlassFET +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540382 +++$+++ 540382 +++$+++ 2007-07-31 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.185928500E09 +++$+++ As for communicating with that user, this is the first time I've been online since I made the first request. And it's not necessary: if you'd bother to actually look into it (actually look at the history of the deleted userspace article, and compare last version of deleted userspace article with first version of article space article), it would be clear enough. That's how I figured it out (plus I was there when it happened).  +++$+++ :As for communicating with that user, this is the first time I've been online since I made the first request. And it's not necessary: if you'd bother to actually look into it (actually look at the history of the deleted userspace article, and compare last version of deleted userspace article with first version of article space article), it would be clear enough. That's how I figured it out (plus I was there when it happened). [[User talk:GlassFET|GlassFET]] 17:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

16095 +++$+++ Kubura +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16095 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-06 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.286362800E09 +++$+++ <u>'''3RR in less than 24h''' on the article [[Croatian language]]<\/u>. 14:40 3 Oct [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Croatian_language&diff=388458427&oldid=388454940], 16:44 3 Oct [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Croatian_language&diff=388471650&oldid=388462361], 12:15 4 Oct [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Croatian_language&diff=388653646&oldid=388652567].  +++$+++ <u>'''3RR in less than 24h''' on the article [[Croatian language]]</u>. 14:40 3 Oct [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Croatian_language&diff=388458427&oldid=388454940], 16:44 3 Oct [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Croatian_language&diff=388471650&oldid=388462361], 12:15 4 Oct [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Croatian_language&diff=388653646&oldid=388652567]. [[User:Kubura|Kubura]] ([[User talk:Kubura|talk]]) 04:00, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
16096 +++$+++ Taivo +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16095 +++$+++ 16095 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.286407260E09 +++$+++ I got one of these, too.  It's hilarious.  -- +++$+++ :I got one of these, too.  It's hilarious.  --[[User:Taivo|Taivo]] ([[User talk:Taivo|talk]]) 16:21, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
16097 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16095 +++$+++ 16096 +++$+++ 2010-10-06 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.286408820E09 +++$+++ Yes, I know. I've been laughing too.;) -- +++$+++ ::Yes, I know. I've been laughing too.;) --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 16:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

16098 +++$+++ Kubura +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-08 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.286523000E09 +++$+++ Please, take the message seriously. Wikipedia is supposed to be serious project, not a mocking ground.  +++$+++ Please, take the message seriously. Wikipedia is supposed to be serious project, not a mocking ground. [[User:Kubura|Kubura]] ([[User talk:Kubura|talk]]) 00:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
16099 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16098 +++$+++ 16098 +++$+++ 2010-10-08 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.286573220E09 +++$+++ I would if you would have. Your motivation for putting this here is all too clear and the one you put on Taivo's page really made me L-O-oh-so-L. 3RR in 27h? Right. -- +++$+++ :I would if you would have. Your motivation for putting this here is all too clear and the one you put on Taivo's page really made me L-O-oh-so-L. 3RR in 27h? Right. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 14:27, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
16100 +++$+++ Taivo +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16098 +++$+++ 16099 +++$+++ 2010-10-08 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.286573700E09 +++$+++ Have you stopped laughing yet?  -- +++$+++ ::Have you stopped laughing yet?  --[[User:Taivo|Taivo]] ([[User talk:Taivo|talk]]) 14:35, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
16101 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16098 +++$+++ 16100 +++$+++ 2010-10-08 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.286574120E09 +++$+++ I'm not quite sure. In any case, while I did stop (though it took some time), I now started really -O-L again...these are really too funny. -- +++$+++ :::I'm not quite sure. In any case, while I did stop (though it took some time), I now started really -O-L again...these are really too funny. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 14:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

540387 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-01 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.185978720E09 +++$+++ this seemed a sober enough article to me, and as one admin to another,  you might want to consider whether it should have been deleted. I suggest you might want to look at the talk page of the editor who listed it for deletion. There seem to be well-justified complaints of POINT, & I would be very cautious with any of his nominations. But your call. ''' +++$+++ this seemed a sober enough article to me, and as one admin to another,  you might want to consider whether it should have been deleted. I suggest you might want to look at the talk page of the editor who listed it for deletion. There seem to be well-justified complaints of POINT, & I would be very cautious with any of his nominations. But your call. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 07:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
540388 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540387 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-01 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.186035600E09 +++$+++ see the two CBC sources I found. I can see why anyone associated with the school would rather have the article deleted than have these included. ''' +++$+++ ::see the two CBC sources I found. I can see why anyone associated with the school would rather have the article deleted than have these included. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 23:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

570662 +++$+++ Debresser +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570662 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-15 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.237172520E09 +++$+++ I did some work in the [[:Category:Wikipedia pages with incorrect protection templates]]. Over 180 entries had accumulated there. It brought that down to 9 (see my [[User_talk:Debresser#Protection_templates|talk page]]). There's some 9 left. Part of them need administrator priviliges (which I don't know if you have them). Part of them need a good idea. And 2 of them are actually yours. Smile!  +++$+++ I did some work in the [[:Category:Wikipedia pages with incorrect protection templates]]. Over 180 entries had accumulated there. It brought that down to 9 (see my [[User_talk:Debresser#Protection_templates|talk page]]). There's some 9 left. Part of them need administrator priviliges (which I don't know if you have them). Part of them need a good idea. And 2 of them are actually yours. Smile! [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] ([[User talk:Debresser|talk]]) 20:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
570663 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570662 +++$+++ 570662 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.237173360E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 20:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

16102 +++$+++ Chipmunkdavis +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-10 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.286745960E09 +++$+++ I'd take out your response in the RfC. It was closed and shouldn't really be modified.  +++$+++ I'd take out your response in the RfC. It was closed and shouldn't really be modified. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|Chipmunkdavis]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 14:26, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
16103 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16102 +++$+++ 16102 +++$+++ 2010-10-10 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.286746200E09 +++$+++ And Mir Harven's... Problem is we were still discussing there while someone just closed that, and I can't just not respond because someone decided to put a box around it. If you know how to take it out without disrupting understanding of the string of posts, then I'd appreciate it. -- +++$+++ :And Mir Harven's... Problem is we were still discussing there while someone just closed that, and I can't just not respond because someone decided to put a box around it. If you know how to take it out without disrupting understanding of the string of posts, then I'd appreciate it. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 14:30, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
16104 +++$+++ Chipmunkdavis +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16102 +++$+++ 16103 +++$+++ 2010-10-10 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.286746740E09 +++$+++ I've seen them moved to the bottom out of the box, but within the same heading, although I'm not sure that's standard practise. I alerted the closer to Mir Haven's insertion at [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise#Croatian RfC note]], so you may want to ask them. Sorry can't help more.  +++$+++ ::I've seen them moved to the bottom out of the box, but within the same heading, although I'm not sure that's standard practise. I alerted the closer to Mir Haven's insertion at [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise#Croatian RfC note]], so you may want to ask them. Sorry can't help more. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|Chipmunkdavis]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 14:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

540393 +++$+++  +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Everyone of us looks for something different, and there are 1200 of us. You have no need to convince me you do most things right.  The choice in CSD patrol is not keep\/delete--it's keep\/afd\/prod\/leave for another admin\/delete. Most people watch the articles they put speedies on, and if they disagree with me & want to pursue it, they can go to afd with my blessing--I often suggest it. If you want to see what I decline to delete, there's an easier way--just look at my contributions. I leave a clear summary. 04:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ Everyone of us looks for something different, and there are 1200 of us. You have no need to convince me you do most things right.  The choice in CSD patrol is not keep/delete--it's keep/afd/prod/leave for another admin/delete. Most people watch the articles they put speedies on, and if they disagree with me & want to pursue it, they can go to afd with my blessing--I often suggest it. If you want to see what I decline to delete, there's an easier way--just look at my contributions. I leave a clear summary. 04:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
540394 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540393 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.186055820E09 +++$+++ of all the processes in WP, the oddest is DRV. Several people have kept a tally from time to time. The question their is process vs results. Personally, i stick to process, because it limits the area where we need to argue about. If we had to discuss every article on core principles, or judge whether something ''ought'' to be deleted, there would be no time to do any work. If there are rules, and they work 90% of the time, it limits the conflicts. I learned quickly to not worry when a decision didnt go my way, as editor or as admin. I can perhaps slightly affect the way other people think, but I can't expect to dominate them. In large systems one learns to pick one's fights & finds a limited area within which to work effectively. What you & I should do is find areas where we can work together. ''' +++$+++ ::of all the processes in WP, the oddest is DRV. Several people have kept a tally from time to time. The question their is process vs results. Personally, i stick to process, because it limits the area where we need to argue about. If we had to discuss every article on core principles, or judge whether something ''ought'' to be deleted, there would be no time to do any work. If there are rules, and they work 90% of the time, it limits the conflicts. I learned quickly to not worry when a decision didnt go my way, as editor or as admin. I can perhaps slightly affect the way other people think, but I can't expect to dominate them. In large systems one learns to pick one's fights & finds a limited area within which to work effectively. What you & I should do is find areas where we can work together. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 04:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
540395 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540393 +++$+++ 540393 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.186059420E09 +++$+++ Looking at common interests, i think we might work to rescue the articles from the German WP which are put in for historically notable people, but where only the first line is translated & , as typical for deWP, there are no real sources. My German is probably a little weaker than yours, & I am reluctant to do a translation on a academic subject, tho I have once or twice. My French is a little better, & I have the typical librarian's attitude that I will try to decipher a little of anything in any script I can read, which includes Russian and Greek, but not Armenian.  But if you mean common interests at AfD and so on, i have always found it makes a difference when I support the deletion of something in a field I often oppose deleting, but when the particular subject isnt worthy. and vice versa. ''' +++$+++ :Looking at common interests, i think we might work to rescue the articles from the German WP which are put in for historically notable people, but where only the first line is translated & , as typical for deWP, there are no real sources. My German is probably a little weaker than yours, & I am reluctant to do a translation on a academic subject, tho I have once or twice. My French is a little better, & I have the typical librarian's attitude that I will try to decipher a little of anything in any script I can read, which includes Russian and Greek, but not Armenian.  But if you mean common interests at AfD and so on, i have always found it makes a difference when I support the deletion of something in a field I often oppose deleting, but when the particular subject isnt worthy. and vice versa. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 05:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
540396 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540393 +++$+++ 540393 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.186073400E09 +++$+++ I do not want to jeopardize our developing rapport, but I think your comment at the MfD for Category:Wolves in popular culture was not well advised. But even if I oppose you here it need not spread otherwise. I personally  have no difficult in being on friendly terms with opponents in some things, and working with them on whatever it is we do agree on. ''' +++$+++ :I do not want to jeopardize our developing rapport, but I think your comment at the MfD for Category:Wolves in popular culture was not well advised. But even if I oppose you here it need not spread otherwise. I personally  have no difficult in being on friendly terms with opponents in some things, and working with them on whatever it is we do agree on. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 09:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

16106 +++$+++ Aeusoes1 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16106 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-10 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.286709180E09 +++$+++ Although from your structural (4) perspective, Croatian is just part of a larger language that many call Serbo-Croatian, how is using this perspective to answer the language-dialect question [[objectivity (science)|objective]]?  Not only is the mutual intelligibility issue problematic in itself (What percentage of unintelligibility is too unintelligible? Does grammar determine intelligibility or does lexicon\/phonology? What discourse situations are relevant to the question of intelligibility? What about differences that [[diaphoneme|don't factor into intelligibility]]?), but the structural perspective seems reminiscent of the [[scientism|scientistic]] [[typology (anthropology)|typological definition of race]] that attempted to use science to reinforce what we now see as a [[Social constructionism|cultural construct]].  In other words, how are the other perspectives irrelevant? \u2014  +++$+++ Although from your structural (4) perspective, Croatian is just part of a larger language that many call Serbo-Croatian, how is using this perspective to answer the language-dialect question [[objectivity (science)|objective]]?  Not only is the mutual intelligibility issue problematic in itself (What percentage of unintelligibility is too unintelligible? Does grammar determine intelligibility or does lexicon/phonology? What discourse situations are relevant to the question of intelligibility? What about differences that [[diaphoneme|don't factor into intelligibility]]?), but the structural perspective seems reminiscent of the [[scientism|scientistic]] [[typology (anthropology)|typological definition of race]] that attempted to use science to reinforce what we now see as a [[Social constructionism|cultural construct]].  In other words, how are the other perspectives irrelevant? — [[User:Aeusoes1|Æµ§œš¹]] <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">[[User talk:aeusoes1|<small><sub>[aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi]</sub></small>]]</span> 04:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
16107 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16106 +++$+++ 16106 +++$+++ 2010-10-10 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.286767980E09 +++$+++ I'm a bit pressed for time in RL right now. I'll get back to you later. -- +++$+++ :I'm a bit pressed for time in RL right now. I'll get back to you later. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 20:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
16108 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16106 +++$+++ 16106 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.287294060E09 +++$+++ I'm happy to elaborate further on this if you wish. -- +++$+++ :I'm happy to elaborate further on this if you wish. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 22:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
16109 +++$+++ Aeusoes1 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16106 +++$+++ 16108 +++$+++ 2010-10-17 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.287314520E09 +++$+++ Yes, please do.  \u2014  +++$+++ ::Yes, please do.  — [[User:Aeusoes1|Æµ§œš¹]] <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">[[User talk:aeusoes1|<small><sub>[aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi]</sub></small>]]</span> 04:22, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
16110 +++$+++ Kwamikagami +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16106 +++$+++ 16109 +++$+++ 2010-10-17 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.287320400E09 +++$+++ Croatian is not a separate dialect from Serbian. It isn't even a separate accent. What we have here are separate [[register (sociolinguistics)|register]]s and standards. These are, of course, legitimate differences, they just aren't dialectologically based. The structural differences come from (1) language planning, (2) ethnically based education, and (3) religiously and culturally (historically) based vocabulary. (At least that I'm aware of.) \u2014  +++$+++ :::Croatian is not a separate dialect from Serbian. It isn't even a separate accent. What we have here are separate [[register (sociolinguistics)|register]]s and standards. These are, of course, legitimate differences, they just aren't dialectologically based. The structural differences come from (1) language planning, (2) ethnically based education, and (3) religiously and culturally (historically) based vocabulary. (At least that I'm aware of.) — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 06:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

540398 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-02 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.186104840E09 +++$+++ ''You wrote:'' I'm not trying to be obtuse, but is what you're saying in essence that if we cannot tell whether an award is utterly trivial then that uncertainty becomes sufficient assertion of notability to not apply A7? So if an assumption needs to be made, or discretion employed, A7 doesn't apply because the assertion of notability has been made?  +++$+++ ''You wrote:'' I'm not trying to be obtuse, but is what you're saying in essence that if we cannot tell whether an award is utterly trivial then that uncertainty becomes sufficient assertion of notability to not apply A7? So if an assumption needs to be made, or discretion employed, A7 doesn't apply because the assertion of notability has been made? [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 18:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
540399 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540398 +++$+++ 540398 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.186115460E09 +++$+++ If an article has been tagged with a notability template for a month or more, and nothing significant has been added, i would be far more willing to put an A7 on it. Even so, prod really is no more work for anyone, and does not clog afd, and sometimes it results in valid but initially poorly written articles being saved.  +++$+++ :If an article has been tagged with a notability template for a month or more, and nothing significant has been added, i would be far more willing to put an A7 on it. Even so, prod really is no more work for anyone, and does not clog afd, and sometimes it results in valid but initially poorly written articles being saved. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 21:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
540400 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540398 +++$+++ 540399 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.186116720E09 +++$+++ Actually if the issue is \"contentious\" in the sense I think you mean, that at least implies that there has in fact been \"contention\" which probably cause greater notice to be taken of the subject, and thus would probably '''increase''' its notability, not decrease it, other things being equal (as they never are). Recall that press coverage is a main form of evidence of notability, particularly for subjects like bands. In any case where there has been significant dispute (not counting dispute with one person who keeps reinserting an obviously improper article) I would be disinclined to use A7.  +++$+++ ::Actually if the issue is "contentious" in the sense I think you mean, that at least implies that there has in fact been "contention" which probably cause greater notice to be taken of the subject, and thus would probably '''increase''' its notability, not decrease it, other things being equal (as they never are). Recall that press coverage is a main form of evidence of notability, particularly for subjects like bands. In any case where there has been significant dispute (not counting dispute with one person who keeps reinserting an obviously improper article) I would be disinclined to use A7. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 21:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
540401 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540398 +++$+++ 540400 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.186116900E09 +++$+++ In a BLP context \"contentious\" mostly means \"someone could reasonably argue this is defamatory, even if not everyone woudl agree\". I would be wary of using that concept in any other context, however --- BLP is a rather special case.  +++$+++ :::In a BLP context "contentious" mostly means "someone could reasonably argue this is defamatory, even if not everyone woudl agree". I would be wary of using that concept in any other context, however --- BLP is a rather special case. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 21:55, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
540402 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540398 +++$+++ 540401 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.186177620E09 +++$+++ What I meant is that one should not extend the specifically BLP-based notion of \"contentious\" to contexts where BLP is not in play. Also one should note that it is statements or alleged facts that can be contentious under BLP, '''not''' individuals or groups. I don't think I wald be likely to remove a statement of the \"Band X is associated with band Y\" type under BLP unless band Y has a very widely known and very negative reputation, widely known enough to be recognized by the person who does NOT follow music.  +++$+++ ::::What I meant is that one should not extend the specifically BLP-based notion of "contentious" to contexts where BLP is not in play. Also one should note that it is statements or alleged facts that can be contentious under BLP, '''not''' individuals or groups. I don't think I wald be likely to remove a statement of the "Band X is associated with band Y" type under BLP unless band Y has a very widely known and very negative reputation, widely known enough to be recognized by the person who does NOT follow music. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 14:47, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
540403 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540398 +++$+++ 540402 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.186207320E09 +++$+++ An unsourced statement that Joe Blow uses raunchy lyrics might arguably be contentious and if so, should perhaps be removed. But an unsourced statement that Joe Blow was a member of Band X is not a statement that Joe Blow uses raunchy lyrics, even if Band X is known for such, that would be [[WP:SYNTH]]. But the unsourced statement that Joe Blow was a member of Band X is a claim of notability '''if''' Band X is concededly or arguably notable. In such a case I would probably use prod or afd rather than speedy. i would be all the more inclined to do so because I am not particularly knowledgeable about current popular music, and a statement that would obviously imply notability to one who is knowledgeable I might well miss the significance of.  +++$+++ :::::An unsourced statement that Joe Blow uses raunchy lyrics might arguably be contentious and if so, should perhaps be removed. But an unsourced statement that Joe Blow was a member of Band X is not a statement that Joe Blow uses raunchy lyrics, even if Band X is known for such, that would be [[WP:SYNTH]]. But the unsourced statement that Joe Blow was a member of Band X is a claim of notability '''if''' Band X is concededly or arguably notable. In such a case I would probably use prod or afd rather than speedy. i would be all the more inclined to do so because I am not particularly knowledgeable about current popular music, and a statement that would obviously imply notability to one who is knowledgeable I might well miss the significance of. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 23:02, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

16111 +++$+++ Chipmunkdavis +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16111 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-22 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.287733140E09 +++$+++ With all this edit warring on the lead, I thought it'd be useful to have a section in the article on the social language vs the linguistic language. Please take a look at [[User:Chipmunkdavis\/Sandbox]], and feel free to edit it if you can, it's quite bad now.  +++$+++ With all this edit warring on the lead, I thought it'd be useful to have a section in the article on the social language vs the linguistic language. Please take a look at [[User:Chipmunkdavis/Sandbox]], and feel free to edit it if you can, it's quite bad now. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|Chipmunkdavis]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 00:39, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
16112 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16111 +++$+++ 16111 +++$+++ 2010-10-22 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.287773580E09 +++$+++ Certainly useful, it wouldn't be complete without one. The sentence \"However, purely linguistic considerations can be 'outranked' by sociopolitical criteria, so that speech systems which are mutually intelligible have been designated as separate languages\" is false. The only useful (I can't say 'valid') use of sociopolitical criteria for this is when purely linguistic evidence is (presently) ambiguous. Linguistic considerations are extremely unequivocal in the case of Croatian. While from a sociological perspective (sociolinguistics) Croatian can definitely be considered a language, structurally there is no ambiguity over its membership of the linguistic unity called Serbo-Croatian. I am at present not certain as how to rephrase it, though. I'll put this on the associated talk page too. -- +++$+++ :Certainly useful, it wouldn't be complete without one. The sentence "However, purely linguistic considerations can be 'outranked' by sociopolitical criteria, so that speech systems which are mutually intelligible have been designated as separate languages" is false. The only useful (I can't say 'valid') use of sociopolitical criteria for this is when purely linguistic evidence is (presently) ambiguous. Linguistic considerations are extremely unequivocal in the case of Croatian. While from a sociological perspective (sociolinguistics) Croatian can definitely be considered a language, structurally there is no ambiguity over its membership of the linguistic unity called Serbo-Croatian. I am at present not certain as how to rephrase it, though. I'll put this on the associated talk page too. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 11:53, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

16113 +++$+++ Yalens +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-25 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.290682320E09 +++$+++ I have a list for the whole Nakh-Dagestanian family, with Hurrian and Urartian included (as Starostin and others suggested) in my user pages... here [[User:Yalens\/Swadesh_List_of_Nakho-Dagestani_languages]]. Since you made the Lezgic and Avar-Andic lists, might you be interested in helping? -- +++$+++ I have a list for the whole Nakh-Dagestanian family, with Hurrian and Urartian included (as Starostin and others suggested) in my user pages... here [[User:Yalens/Swadesh_List_of_Nakho-Dagestani_languages]]. Since you made the Lezgic and Avar-Andic lists, might you be interested in helping? --[[User:Yalens|Yalens]] ([[User talk:Yalens|talk]]) 02:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
16114 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16113 +++$+++ 16113 +++$+++ 2010-11-25 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.290705180E09 +++$+++ In principle I would, but I don't know how much time I will have to invest in it (way too many things to do in RL). We'll see how it goes. -- +++$+++ :In principle I would, but I don't know how much time I will have to invest in it (way too many things to do in RL). We'll see how it goes. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 09:13, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

16115 +++$+++ PRODUCER +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16115 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-01 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.291233660E09 +++$+++ I saw your participation in the Croatian language article and thought that you would be interested in this: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Croatian_language_article] --<font face=\"xx-medium serif\">  +++$+++ I saw your participation in the Croatian language article and thought that you would be interested in this: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Croatian_language_article] --<font face="xx-medium serif"> [[User:PRODUCER|<font color="black"><font style="letter-spacing: 0.2cm;">◅PRODUCER]]</font></font> <sub>([[User talk:PRODUCER|<font color="black">TALK</font>]])</sub></font> 12:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
16116 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16115 +++$+++ 16115 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.291244340E09 +++$+++ Thanks. -- +++$+++ :Thanks. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 14:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

540404 +++$+++ Jtalledo +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-03 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.186141140E09 +++$+++ I was thinking it would have fit [[WP:CSD|CSD]] criteria for [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G4|#4]]. From my understanding, templates just like that one have been deleted in the past - see [[WP:NDT]]. -- +++$+++ I was thinking it would have fit [[WP:CSD|CSD]] criteria for [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G4|#4]]. From my understanding, templates just like that one have been deleted in the past - see [[WP:NDT]]. --[[User:Jtalledo|Jtalledo]] [[User_talk:Jtalledo|(talk)]] 04:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
540405 +++$+++ Jtalledo +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540404 +++$+++ 540404 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.186210980E09 +++$+++ I already listed it, but thanks for the offer. lol -- +++$+++ :I already listed it, but thanks for the offer. lol --[[User:Jtalledo|Jtalledo]] [[User_talk:Jtalledo|(talk)]] 00:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

16117 +++$+++ 虞海 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-11 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.294774080E09 +++$+++ \u2013\u2013 +++$+++ ––[[User:虞海|<Span xml:lang="zh-Hant-CN" lang="zh-Hant">虞海</Span> (<span class="Unicode">Yú Hǎi</span>)]] <Big>[[User talk:虞海#top|<span class="Unicode">✍</span>]]</Big> 11:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
16118 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16117 +++$+++ 16117 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.294775100E09 +++$+++ For these (and more) reasons I changed or tagged some of it, in the hopes of getting more explanation and less language gymnastics, hoping to get a grip of what was meant to be said.  -- +++$+++ :For these (and more) reasons I changed or tagged some of it, in the hopes of getting more explanation and less language gymnastics, hoping to get a grip of what was meant to be said.  --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 11:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
16119 +++$+++ 虞海 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16117 +++$+++ 16118 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.294775760E09 +++$+++ In Chinese, it's called tuyu and ci-tuyu (sub-tuyu). The using of \"sub-sub\" is origined from the book ISBN3895862118. \u2013\u2013 +++$+++ :: In Chinese, it's called tuyu and ci-tuyu (sub-tuyu). The using of "sub-sub" is origined from the book ISBN3895862118. ––[[User:虞海|<Span xml:lang="zh-Hant-CN" lang="zh-Hant">虞海</Span> (<span class="Unicode">Yú Hǎi</span>)]] <Big>[[User talk:虞海#top|<span class="Unicode">✍</span>]]</Big> 11:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
16120 +++$+++ 虞海 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16117 +++$+++ 16118 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.294775820E09 +++$+++ By its definition, a tuyu is - a patois\/lect. \u2013\u2013 +++$+++ :: By its definition, a tuyu is - a patois/lect. ––[[User:虞海|<Span xml:lang="zh-Hant-CN" lang="zh-Hant">虞海</Span> (<span class="Unicode">Yú Hǎi</span>)]] <Big>[[User talk:虞海#top|<span class="Unicode">✍</span>]]</Big> 11:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
16121 +++$+++ 虞海 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16117 +++$+++ 16118 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.294775940E09 +++$+++ Read it and you'll know why. Even though it's written in French, the list in the book can be easily understood. \u2013\u2013 +++$+++ :: Read it and you'll know why. Even though it's written in French, the list in the book can be easily understood. ––[[User:虞海|<Span xml:lang="zh-Hant-CN" lang="zh-Hant">虞海</Span> (<span class="Unicode">Yú Hǎi</span>)]] <Big>[[User talk:虞海#top|<span class="Unicode">✍</span>]]</Big> 11:59, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

540408 +++$+++ Kurykh +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-04 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.186213440E09 +++$+++ You delete expired prods, not list them on AfD. Please see [[WP:PROD]]. \u2014''' +++$+++ You delete expired prods, not list them on AfD. Please see [[WP:PROD]]. —'''[[User:Kurykh|<font color="#0000C0" face="cursive">Kurykh</font>]]''' 00:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
540409 +++$+++ Kurykh +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540408 +++$+++ 540408 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.186213920E09 +++$+++ \"''Someone has to make the determination whether the use is for uncontroversial deletion or not...''\" Please explain this statement. \u2014''' +++$+++ :"''Someone has to make the determination whether the use is for uncontroversial deletion or not...''" Please explain this statement. —'''[[User:Kurykh|<font color="#0000C0" face="cursive">Kurykh</font>]]''' 00:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
540410 +++$+++ Kurykh +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540408 +++$+++ 540408 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.186214580E09 +++$+++ No, I didn't say that you should delete them mindlessly. I'm sorry if I gave that impression. However, some of the AfD-ed ones were pretty obvious (to me, at least), and posting on AfD just for the sake of process (and potential \"controversy\") would have been more of a waste of time than anything else. \u2014''' +++$+++ :No, I didn't say that you should delete them mindlessly. I'm sorry if I gave that impression. However, some of the AfD-ed ones were pretty obvious (to me, at least), and posting on AfD just for the sake of process (and potential "controversy") would have been more of a waste of time than anything else. —'''[[User:Kurykh|<font color="#0000C0" face="cursive">Kurykh</font>]]''' 01:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

483284 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483284 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-18 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.190182920E09 +++$+++ Here's another one. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Mr._GlennLesley]  +++$+++ Here's another one. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mr._GlennLesley] [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 23:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
483285 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483284 +++$+++ 483284 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.190184360E09 +++$+++ And this one's likely. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/PizzaDeluxe] Not baseball, but a couple of his socks made this edit repeatedly a few days ago. - +++$+++ :And this one's likely. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/PizzaDeluxe] Not baseball, but a couple of his socks made this edit repeatedly a few days ago. -[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 23:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

16122 +++$+++ 虞海 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-11 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.294776240E09 +++$+++ \u2013\u2013 +++$+++ ––[[User:虞海|<Span xml:lang="zh-Hant-CN" lang="zh-Hant">虞海</Span> (<span class="Unicode">Yú Hǎi</span>)]] <Big>[[User talk:虞海#top|<span class="Unicode">✍</span>]]</Big> 12:04, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
16123 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16122 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.294776840E09 +++$+++ Instead of addressing my objections, you state what these are ''called'' in XX language. Please address the objections, instead of playing a what-are-they-called-in-XX game. (Also, the book won't open for me, please try to provide direct links, and preferably ones I can open) -- +++$+++ :::Instead of addressing my objections, you state what these are ''called'' in XX language. Please address the objections, instead of playing a what-are-they-called-in-XX game. (Also, the book won't open for me, please try to provide direct links, and preferably ones I can open) --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 12:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
16124 +++$+++ 虞海 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16122 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.296169980E09 +++$+++ I think the issue here is that ''Chuanqiandian subdialect'' is a '''proper''' subset of ''Chuanqiandian dialect'', which in turn is a proper subset of [[Miao language]]. When you changed ''Chuanqiandian subdialect'' to ''Chuanqiandian dialect'', you mischanged the size of the category. \u2013\u2013 +++$+++ :::: I think the issue here is that ''Chuanqiandian subdialect'' is a '''proper''' subset of ''Chuanqiandian dialect'', which in turn is a proper subset of [[Miao language]]. When you changed ''Chuanqiandian subdialect'' to ''Chuanqiandian dialect'', you mischanged the size of the category. ––[[User:虞海|<Span xml:lang="zh-Hant-CN" lang="zh-Hant">虞海</Span> (<span class="Unicode">Yú Hǎi</span>)]] <Big>[[User talk:虞海#top|<span class="Unicode">✍</span>]]</Big> 15:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
16125 +++$+++ 虞海 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16122 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.296170400E09 +++$+++ The concept of Hmong language outside China is the first ''tuyu'' of ''Chuanqiandian subdialect''. If you changed it to first ''tuyu'' of ''Chuanqiandian dialect'', the issue is: there're several subdialect of ''Chuanqiandian dialect'', and each of them have one or more ''tuyu'' (a.k.a. sub-subdialect), so it won't be clear which ''tuyu'' is the exact ''tuyu'' you want to mention by saying \u201cfirst ''tuyu''\u201d. \u2013\u2013 +++$+++ :::: The concept of Hmong language outside China is the first ''tuyu'' of ''Chuanqiandian subdialect''. If you changed it to first ''tuyu'' of ''Chuanqiandian dialect'', the issue is: there're several subdialect of ''Chuanqiandian dialect'', and each of them have one or more ''tuyu'' (a.k.a. sub-subdialect), so it won't be clear which ''tuyu'' is the exact ''tuyu'' you want to mention by saying “first ''tuyu''”. ––[[User:虞海|<Span xml:lang="zh-Hant-CN" lang="zh-Hant">虞海</Span> (<span class="Unicode">Yú Hǎi</span>)]] <Big>[[User talk:虞海#top|<span class="Unicode">✍</span>]]</Big> 15:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

540411 +++$+++ Kurykh +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-04 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.186215420E09 +++$+++ There is actually a provision in Wikipedia policy for those who predict future notability: [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. Wikipedia isn't really a place to create placeholder articles that may hold promise for future notability\/verifiability\/whatever. I've deleted numerous articles (in closing AfDs) that fail [[WP:N]] and [[WP:V]]. I've seen editors go to DRV and drag me through the mud, saying that their article's subject might be notable someday, to no avail. \u2014''' +++$+++ There is actually a provision in Wikipedia policy for those who predict future notability: [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. Wikipedia isn't really a place to create placeholder articles that may hold promise for future notability/verifiability/whatever. I've deleted numerous articles (in closing AfDs) that fail [[WP:N]] and [[WP:V]]. I've seen editors go to DRV and drag me through the mud, saying that their article's subject might be notable someday, to no avail. —'''[[User:Kurykh|<font color="#0000C0" face="cursive">Kurykh</font>]]''' 01:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
540412 +++$+++ Stormbay +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540411 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.186265820E09 +++$+++ You have taken 2 expired prods to afd in succession. Thats another week of watching articles that should bo gone. I am removing both from my watchlist and moving on. Cheers!-- +++$+++ :: You have taken 2 expired prods to afd in succession. Thats another week of watching articles that should bo gone. I am removing both from my watchlist and moving on. Cheers!--[[User:Stormbay|Stormbay]] 15:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

177450 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ 177450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.310202540E09 +++$+++ Scotty, I would like to propose that we leave our hostilities and diferences behind. I mean, we are both New Yorkers and as such we can get a little hot-headed. I think that it would be in the best interest of Wikipedia, a project which we both enjoy working at. We at times have offended each other and on my behalf I would like to apologize. In regard to the \"Wall of Dishonor\", a joke of bad taste, the \"S\" was not meant for you, this I swear. So, what do you say, truce?  +++$+++ Scotty, I would like to propose that we leave our hostilities and diferences behind. I mean, we are both New Yorkers and as such we can get a little hot-headed. I think that it would be in the best interest of Wikipedia, a project which we both enjoy working at. We at times have offended each other and on my behalf I would like to apologize. In regard to the "Wall of Dishonor", a joke of bad taste, the "S" was not meant for you, this I swear. So, what do you say, truce? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71#top|talk]]) 02:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
177451 +++$+++ A Quest For Knowledge +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ 177450 +++$+++ 177450 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.310203080E09 +++$+++ Are you saying that Scotty was being \"hot-headed\"?  If so, can you please tell us what Scotty did that was \"hot-headed\"?   +++$+++ :Are you saying that Scotty was being "hot-headed"?  If so, can you please tell us what Scotty did that was "hot-headed"?  [[User:A Quest For Knowledge|A Quest For Knowledge]] ([[User talk:A Quest For Knowledge|talk]]) 02:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
177452 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ 177450 +++$+++ 177451 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310203740E09 +++$+++ Look this a peace offing directed at Scotty and is not intended to start an arguement. We New Yorkers are a little hot-headed is just a saying that's all.  +++$+++ **Look this a peace offing directed at Scotty and is not intended to start an arguement. We New Yorkers are a little hot-headed is just a saying that's all. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71#top|talk]]) 02:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
177453 +++$+++ ScottyBerg +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ 177450 +++$+++ 177450 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310204520E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your offer to not use your tools for a year, but I think that you should seriously consider giving up your tools, preferably for good but certainly at least for the year you propose. You have no need of them, and frankly you have demonstrated you should not have them. I apologize for my bluntness, but that is my opinion. I think that article writing and administration are two not necessarily complimentary disciplines. It is the same in RL. In RL I have tried managing, and I am not good at it. Administrating at Wikipedia is a burden that does not interest me. If I had it, and I was found wanting, I would want to be rid of it. I strongly recommend that you rid yourself of this unnecessary burden. Thanks for your note, and I do appreciate your conciliatory tone. Respectfully,  +++$+++ :I appreciate your offer to not use your tools for a year, but I think that you should seriously consider giving up your tools, preferably for good but certainly at least for the year you propose. You have no need of them, and frankly you have demonstrated you should not have them. I apologize for my bluntness, but that is my opinion. I think that article writing and administration are two not necessarily complimentary disciplines. It is the same in RL. In RL I have tried managing, and I am not good at it. Administrating at Wikipedia is a burden that does not interest me. If I had it, and I was found wanting, I would want to be rid of it. I strongly recommend that you rid yourself of this unnecessary burden. Thanks for your note, and I do appreciate your conciliatory tone. Respectfully, [[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 02:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
177454 +++$+++ ScottyBerg +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ 177450 +++$+++ 177450 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.310206500E09 +++$+++ Anyway, so ends my soapboxing. If I've abused my hospitality please feel free to delete.  +++$+++ :Anyway, so ends my soapboxing. If I've abused my hospitality please feel free to delete. [[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 03:15, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
177455 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ 177450 +++$+++ 177454 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.310208840E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your advice and thoughts. I want to think about the situation and not rush into anything that I may regret in the future. You know how it is when you rush into things without thinking, the end result is not usually good. I know about that. On the lighter side, I have a question for you. The main objective of the articles which I have created is to educate people, especially Puerto Ricans, about Puerto Rico. My question is, from your perspective, did I accomplish that with the \"Irish immigration to Puerto Rico\"?, What I mean, did you know about the strong Irish influence in Puerto Rico, before reading the article. Thank you for any insight.  (By the way, I did apologize to User: Varleem).  +++$+++ **Thank you for your advice and thoughts. I want to think about the situation and not rush into anything that I may regret in the future. You know how it is when you rush into things without thinking, the end result is not usually good. I know about that. On the lighter side, I have a question for you. The main objective of the articles which I have created is to educate people, especially Puerto Ricans, about Puerto Rico. My question is, from your perspective, did I accomplish that with the "Irish immigration to Puerto Rico"?, What I mean, did you know about the strong Irish influence in Puerto Rico, before reading the article. Thank you for any insight.  (By the way, I did apologize to User: Varleem). [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71#top|talk]]) 03:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
177456 +++$+++ ScottyBerg +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ 177450 +++$+++ 177455 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.310209440E09 +++$+++ So yes, the article is excellent. It is probably among the top 1% of articles on Wikipedia. I would implore you to focus on what you do best, which is carrying out that mission. Leave the bureaucracy to the bureaucrats and managers. Please.  +++$+++ :::So yes, the article is excellent. It is probably among the top 1% of articles on Wikipedia. I would implore you to focus on what you do best, which is carrying out that mission. Leave the bureaucracy to the bureaucrats and managers. Please. [[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 04:04, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

16126 +++$+++ Empathictrust +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-06 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.297040880E09 +++$+++ I believe that the hypothesis of the Albanian erudite [[Pashko Vasa]] is based on a written source and per this reason let to the author of the section the time and the right to find it. I looked on the web for a short time myself but couldn't find a proper citation of it, except for some vague material. Anyway maybe somebody has a written book or some proper source for it. Therefore I hope you comprehend my removal. With all due respect,  +++$+++ I believe that the hypothesis of the Albanian erudite [[Pashko Vasa]] is based on a written source and per this reason let to the author of the section the time and the right to find it. I looked on the web for a short time myself but couldn't find a proper citation of it, except for some vague material. Anyway maybe somebody has a written book or some proper source for it. Therefore I hope you comprehend my removal. With all due respect, [[User:Empathictrust|Empathictrust]] ([[User talk:Empathictrust|talk]]) 17:08, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
16127 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16126 +++$+++ 16126 +++$+++ 2011-02-06 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.297047300E09 +++$+++ I do, I hadn't seen that these tags were added so recently. There are other concerns, though: Whether some 19th-century guy believed this vs. whether this can reasonably be assumed to be correct (or rather: are there important dissenting viewz etc.?). Doubting the latter is easy, making presenting only this hypothesis POV. But I only thought of this just now. -- +++$+++ :I do, I hadn't seen that these tags were added so recently. There are other concerns, though: Whether some 19th-century guy believed this vs. whether this can reasonably be assumed to be correct (or rather: are there important dissenting viewz etc.?). Doubting the latter is easy, making presenting only this hypothesis POV. But I only thought of this just now. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 18:55, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

16128 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16128 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-09 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.297303740E09 +++$+++ Does this make it clear? -- +++$+++ Does this make it clear? --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS|talk]]) 18:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
16129 +++$+++ ComtesseDeMingrelie +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16128 +++$+++ 16128 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.297303920E09 +++$+++ If my move was done badly, you do it correctly. Blank-reverting every single change I made is an easy way out and I do not agree with it. I tried to move the page as I usually do but it did not let me, this is why I had to do it manually. I did not start playing with wikipedia a couple of days ago.-- +++$+++ :If my move was done badly, you do it correctly. Blank-reverting every single change I made is an easy way out and I do not agree with it. I tried to move the page as I usually do but it did not let me, this is why I had to do it manually. I did not start playing with wikipedia a couple of days ago.--[[User:ComtesseDeMingrelie|<font color="Blue">'''''ComtesseDeMingrélie'''''</font>]]  18:12, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
16130 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16128 +++$+++ 16129 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.297304820E09 +++$+++ So you copy-paste it?? No, you engage in a move discussion, and if then there forms a consensus to move it an administrator will execute the move. And I'm contesting the move, so I restore the stable version, not \"do it correctly\". '''''You don't just redo a move away from a stable version twice when contested, so cut the crap and DISCUSS!''''' By moving the page this way, and a full three times, you sure make it look like you've \"just started playing with Wikipedia\". -- +++$+++ ::So you copy-paste it?? No, you engage in a move discussion, and if then there forms a consensus to move it an administrator will execute the move. And I'm contesting the move, so I restore the stable version, not "do it correctly". '''''You don't just redo a move away from a stable version twice when contested, so cut the crap and DISCUSS!''''' By moving the page this way, and a full three times, you sure make it look like you've "just started playing with Wikipedia". --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS|talk]]) 18:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
16131 +++$+++ ComtesseDeMingrelie +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16128 +++$+++ 16130 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.297305000E09 +++$+++ Being unhappy with the move DOES NOT WARRANT the removal of legitimate edits. Do not just CLICK THE BUTTON to revert. I demand that you restore all other changes that did not involve the move\/renaming.-- +++$+++ :::Being unhappy with the move DOES NOT WARRANT the removal of legitimate edits. Do not just CLICK THE BUTTON to revert. I demand that you restore all other changes that did not involve the move/renaming.--[[User:ComtesseDeMingrelie|<font color="Blue">'''''ComtesseDeMingrélie'''''</font>]]  18:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
16132 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16128 +++$+++ 16131 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.297306200E09 +++$+++ Demand?? I'm clicking the undo button because I'm restoring (reverting to!) the ''stable version'', that's what the button is for. And if you request a move, you don't re-copy-paste-move it, you wait. -- +++$+++ ::::Demand?? I'm clicking the undo button because I'm restoring (reverting to!) the ''stable version'', that's what the button is for. And if you request a move, you don't re-copy-paste-move it, you wait. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS|talk]]) 18:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
16133 +++$+++ ComtesseDeMingrelie +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16128 +++$+++ 16132 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.297306500E09 +++$+++ Let me repeat it again. Whatever you think I did wrong by moving the page, removal of legitimate edits was unwarranted. End of the story.-- +++$+++ :::::Let me repeat it again. Whatever you think I did wrong by moving the page, removal of legitimate edits was unwarranted. End of the story.--[[User:ComtesseDeMingrelie|<font color="Blue">'''''ComtesseDeMingrélie'''''</font>]]  18:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
16134 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16128 +++$+++ 16133 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.297307100E09 +++$+++ Not true, they may have been good-faith, but good-faith edits may still be reverted when they're contested. And just answer here instead of my talk page. -- +++$+++ ::::::Not true, they may have been good-faith, but good-faith edits may still be reverted when they're contested. And just answer here instead of my talk page. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS|talk]]) 19:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
16135 +++$+++ ComtesseDeMingrelie +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16128 +++$+++ 16128 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.297307460E09 +++$+++ Of course, then your talk page will be clean while mine will be full of this filth, demonizing me while portraying yourself like an angel. When you reverted the changes, you mentioned that only the move\/the method of moving was contested. If you contested the good-faith edits, you should have said that but you did not. You invented this now after realizing that doing the revert manually would represent an undue hardship for you.-- +++$+++ :Of course, then your talk page will be clean while mine will be full of this filth, demonizing me while portraying yourself like an angel. When you reverted the changes, you mentioned that only the move/the method of moving was contested. If you contested the good-faith edits, you should have said that but you did not. You invented this now after realizing that doing the revert manually would represent an undue hardship for you.--[[User:ComtesseDeMingrelie|<font color="Blue">'''''ComtesseDeMingrélie'''''</font>]]  19:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
16136 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16128 +++$+++ 16135 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.297307760E09 +++$+++ It should be crytal-clear from what I've said and one that it's contested, gee. And.. I'll copy it to my talk page if you'd like, but I do like to have the discussion in its entirety in one place. -- +++$+++ ::It should be crytal-clear from what I've said and one that it's contested, gee. And.. I'll copy it to my talk page if you'd like, but I do like to have the discussion in its entirety in one place. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS|talk]]) 19:16, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

526976 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-12 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.202815620E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 03:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
526977 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526976 +++$+++ 526976 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.203079560E09 +++$+++ Fair use rationale added. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Fair use rationale added. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 04:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

540419 +++$+++ Bulldog123 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540419 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-06 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.186386540E09 +++$+++ I was considering renominating the sub-categories in here but excluding the racial subdivisions established by the American census (Asian, African, Hispanic, and Native American). So only ones like Italian, Irish, Jewish, Chinese, Colombian etc would be upmerged. What do you think about this idea?  +++$+++ I was considering renominating the sub-categories in here but excluding the racial subdivisions established by the American census (Asian, African, Hispanic, and Native American). So only ones like Italian, Irish, Jewish, Chinese, Colombian etc would be upmerged. What do you think about this idea? [[User:Bulldog123|Bulldog123]] 00:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
540420 +++$+++ Bulldog123 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540419 +++$+++ 540419 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.186492200E09 +++$+++ Hi again Carlos. You may have overlooked this with all your recent talk-page edits. Make sure to read. Thanks.  +++$+++ *Hi again Carlos. You may have overlooked this with all your recent talk-page edits. Make sure to read. Thanks. [[User:Bulldog123|Bulldog123]] 06:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

90070 +++$+++ Tnxman307 +++$+++ Gilo1969 +++$+++ 90070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-21 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.303427040E09 +++$+++ Hi. I saw your signature on someone's talk page and was wondering if you would consider shrinking it down some - it's jarringly large. Cheers! <font color=\"darkorange\"> +++$+++ Hi. I saw your signature on someone's talk page and was wondering if you would consider shrinking it down some - it's jarringly large. Cheers! <font color="darkorange">[[User:Tnxman307|TN]]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>[[User talk:Tnxman307|X]]</big></font></b><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Tnxman307|Man]]</font> 16:04, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
90071 +++$+++ Gilo1969 +++$+++ Gilo1969 +++$+++ 90070 +++$+++ 90070 +++$+++ 2011-04-21 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.303434060E09 +++$+++ Fair enough.  +++$+++ :Fair enough. [[User:Gilo1969|<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: white; background: #0066CC; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">GILO&nbsp;</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Gilo1969|<span style="color: white; background: red; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">&nbsp;A&]][[User talk:Gilo1969|<span style="color: white; background: red; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">E'''&uArr;'''</span>]] 18:01, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
90072 +++$+++ Gilo1969 +++$+++ Gilo1969 +++$+++ 90070 +++$+++ 90070 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.304237400E09 +++$+++ Sorry, didn't realise the significance of the Esq. I chose financier as that is how you described him in the intro of the article. Please feel free to change it back; the page [[Thomas Forrest (disambiguation)]] should also be updated to reflect any changes. Best wishes,  +++$+++ :Sorry, didn't realise the significance of the Esq. I chose financier as that is how you described him in the intro of the article. Please feel free to change it back; the page [[Thomas Forrest (disambiguation)]] should also be updated to reflect any changes. Best wishes, [[User:Gilo1969|<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: white; background: #0066CC; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">GILO&nbsp;</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Gilo1969|<span style="color: white; background: red; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">&nbsp;A&]][[User talk:Gilo1969|<span style="color: white; background: red; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">E'''&uArr;'''</span>]] 01:10, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
90073 +++$+++ Gilo1969 +++$+++ Gilo1969 +++$+++ 90070 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.304269740E09 +++$+++ I have redirected my title to your title. Regards,  +++$+++ :::I have redirected my title to your title. Regards, [[User:Gilo1969|<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: white; background: #0066CC; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">GILO&nbsp;</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Gilo1969|<span style="color: white; background: red; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">&nbsp;A&]][[User talk:Gilo1969|<span style="color: white; background: red; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">E'''&uArr;'''</span>]] 10:09, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
90074 +++$+++ Gilo1969 +++$+++ Gilo1969 +++$+++ 90070 +++$+++ 90070 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.304303460E09 +++$+++ Since the person concerned has created 5 vanity pages under different names, this is not possible. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Since the person concerned has created 5 vanity pages under different names, this is not possible. Thanks, [[User:Gilo1969|<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: white; background: #0066CC; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">GILO&nbsp;</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Gilo1969|<span style="color: white; background: red; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">&nbsp;A&]][[User talk:Gilo1969|<span style="color: white; background: red; font-family: 'Arial Rounded MT Bold',Arial,Sans-serif">E'''&uArr;'''</span>]] 19:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

278279 +++$+++ Lord Voldemort +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278279 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-22 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.137933960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reverting vandalism... just so you know, there are templates you can use to warn the vandals. These include {{tl|test}}, {{tl|test2}} (or {{tl|test2a}} or {{tl|test2b}}), and {{tl|test3}}. There are {{tl|test4}} and {{tl|test5}}, but these are generally reserved for Admins who can enforce the warnings. They of course are not ''required'', but sometimes help with recurring vandals. Hope this helps. Keep up the good work. -- +++$+++ Thanks for reverting vandalism... just so you know, there are templates you can use to warn the vandals. These include {{tl|test}}, {{tl|test2}} (or {{tl|test2a}} or {{tl|test2b}}), and {{tl|test3}}. There are {{tl|test4}} and {{tl|test5}}, but these are generally reserved for Admins who can enforce the warnings. They of course are not ''required'', but sometimes help with recurring vandals. Hope this helps. Keep up the good work. --[[User:Lord Voldemort|<font color="purple">LV</font>]] <sup><font color="#3D9140">[[User talk:Lord Voldemort|(Dark Mark)]]</font></sup> 04:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
278280 +++$+++ Lord Voldemort +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278279 +++$+++ 278279 +++$+++ 2006-01-22 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.137934440E09 +++$+++ Hey, no problem. I had just seen your name a few times in the last week or so, so I thought I'd swing by to show some gratitude. Too often, hard work goes unnoticed. Thanks again. -- +++$+++ :Hey, no problem. I had just seen your name a few times in the last week or so, so I thought I'd swing by to show some gratitude. Too often, hard work goes unnoticed. Thanks again. --[[User:Lord Voldemort|<font color="purple">LV</font>]] <sup><font color="#3D9140">[[User talk:Lord Voldemort|(Dark Mark)]]</font></sup> 04:54, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

16137 +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-09 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.297323600E09 +++$+++ Please see my comments at [[Talk:South Caucasian languages#Requested move]].  +++$+++ Please see my comments at [[Talk:South Caucasian languages#Requested move]]. [[User:Dpmuk|Dpmuk]] ([[User talk:Dpmuk|talk]]) 23:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
16138 +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16137 +++$+++ 16137 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.297324020E09 +++$+++ Also please by aware of the [[WP:3RR|3RR rule]] - doing more than 3 reverts in 24 hours can get you [[WP:BLOCK|blocked]].  +++$+++ :Also please by aware of the [[WP:3RR|3RR rule]] - doing more than 3 reverts in 24 hours can get you [[WP:BLOCK|blocked]]. [[User:Dpmuk|Dpmuk]] ([[User talk:Dpmuk|talk]]) 23:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
16139 +++$+++ ComtesseDeMingrelie +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16137 +++$+++ 16138 +++$+++ 2011-02-12 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.297528020E09 +++$+++ I do not need to be reminded of that, thank you.-- +++$+++ ::I do not need to be reminded of that, thank you.--[[User:ComtesseDeMingrelie|<font color="Blue">'''''ComtesseDeMingrélie'''''</font>]]  08:27, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

540426 +++$+++ Tewfik +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-07 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.186539600E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure I follow :-) <font style=\"color:#22AA00;\">''' +++$+++ I'm not sure I follow :-) <font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 19:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
540427 +++$+++ Tewfik +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540426 +++$+++ 540426 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.186539960E09 +++$+++ Well good luck with that. <font style=\"color:#22AA00;\">''' +++$+++ :Well good luck with that. <font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 19:26, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

483287 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.190240520E09 +++$+++ You blocked one this morning. Here's another: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Triviot]  +++$+++ You blocked one this morning. Here's another: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Triviot] [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 15:22, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
483288 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483287 +++$+++ 483287 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.190247000E09 +++$+++ I notice all the recent ones were created in the same 30-minute span yesterday.  Further proof of sockpuppetry (not that more were needed).  \u2014 +++$+++ :I notice all the recent ones were created in the same 30-minute span yesterday.  Further proof of sockpuppetry (not that more were needed).  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 17:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
483289 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483287 +++$+++ 483288 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.190248020E09 +++$+++ So today's socks were created yesterday? \"Sleeper\" accounts? Meanwhile, shall I send the list of stolen usernames to the SABR folks?  +++$+++ ::So today's socks were created yesterday? "Sleeper" accounts? Meanwhile, shall I send the list of stolen usernames to the SABR folks? [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 17:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
483290 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483287 +++$+++ 483289 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.190249460E09 +++$+++ Never mind, I'll just do it, BCC to you.  +++$+++ :::Never mind, I'll just do it, BCC to you. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 17:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

16140 +++$+++ Aeusoes1 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16140 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-12 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.297574700E09 +++$+++ I was under the impression from [[WP:GREEK]] that an initial \u03b3\u03ba should be transcribed as g.  Per [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Voiced_velar_plosive&action=historysubmit&diff=413554000&oldid=413553275 this edit]. am I missing something? \u2014  +++$+++ I was under the impression from [[WP:GREEK]] that an initial γκ should be transcribed as g.  Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Voiced_velar_plosive&action=historysubmit&diff=413554000&oldid=413553275 this edit]. am I missing something? — [[User:Aeusoes1|Æµ§œš¹]] <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">[[User talk:aeusoes1|<small><sub>[aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi]</sub></small>]]</span> 21:25, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
16141 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16140 +++$+++ 16140 +++$+++ 2011-02-12 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.297575600E09 +++$+++ Well, there are several ways of transliterating Greek, see [[Romanization of Greek]]. And as I sort of explained in my edit summary transliterating it as <g> has [at least the potential] to create confusion, because the difference between [g] and [\u0263] is lost that way. It isn't really wrong either way, though. -- +++$+++ :Well, there are several ways of transliterating Greek, see [[Romanization of Greek]]. And as I sort of explained in my edit summary transliterating it as <g> has [at least the potential] to create confusion, because the difference between [g] and [ɣ] is lost that way. It isn't really wrong either way, though. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 21:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
16142 +++$+++ Aeusoes1 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16140 +++$+++ 16141 +++$+++ 2011-02-12 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.297581240E09 +++$+++ Hmmm, we might want to do something about this at [[WP:GREEK]], then.  \u2014  +++$+++ ::Hmmm, we might want to do something about this at [[WP:GREEK]], then.  — [[User:Aeusoes1|Æµ§œš¹]] <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">[[User talk:aeusoes1|<small><sub>[aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi]</sub></small>]]</span> 23:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
16143 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16140 +++$+++ 16142 +++$+++ 2011-02-12 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.297581840E09 +++$+++ It's also good to keep in mind the difference between Ancient and Modern Greek. I've never seen e.g. Modern Greek \u03c9 transliterated as \u014d (but I don't dare to claim I've seen all). Also, [[WP:GREEK]] gives <y> as a possible transliteration of both <\u03b3> and <\u03c5>, which are quite distinct. And where did the remark about the diacritics come from? AFAIK one does not want to compromise precision when transliterating especially when completely unnecessary, which is precisely what happens when they are omitted. -- +++$+++ :::It's also good to keep in mind the difference between Ancient and Modern Greek. I've never seen e.g. Modern Greek ω transliterated as ō (but I don't dare to claim I've seen all). Also, [[WP:GREEK]] gives <y> as a possible transliteration of both <γ> and <υ>, which are quite distinct. And where did the remark about the diacritics come from? AFAIK one does not want to compromise precision when transliterating especially when completely unnecessary, which is precisely what happens when they are omitted. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 23:24, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
16144 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16140 +++$+++ 16140 +++$+++ 2011-02-17 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.297984260E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 15:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

526978 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526978 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-12 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.202818320E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 04:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
526979 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526978 +++$+++ 526978 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.202818920E09 +++$+++ Specific fair use rationale provided consistent with current guidelines.  These requirements were not in place at the time of original upload. &mdash;  +++$+++ : Specific fair use rationale provided consistent with current guidelines.  These requirements were not in place at the time of original upload. &mdash; [[User:ERcheck|ERcheck]] ([[User talk:ERcheck|talk]]) 04:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

278286 +++$+++ Codex Sinaiticus +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278286 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-14 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.139983080E09 +++$+++ If I revert him again, I run the risk of being blocked for the 3RR rule... It's on you now... He can't revert any more either...  I don't think his edit will stand the test of consensus, eventually...  +++$+++ If I revert him again, I run the risk of being blocked for the 3RR rule... It's on you now... He can't revert any more either...  I don't think his edit will stand the test of consensus, eventually... [[User:Codex Sinaiticus|ፈቃደ]] ([[User talk:Codex Sinaiticus|ውይይት]]) 21:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
278287 +++$+++ Codex Sinaiticus +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278286 +++$+++ 278286 +++$+++ 2006-02-14 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.139987460E09 +++$+++ Not quite \"beat you to it\"... Sam S merely went back to his old favored version that was discarded long ago, and now it's just gone back to Serge's version...  We now have a clear consensus to drop \"mythology\" as unecessary, ambiguous and probable pov-pushing, I just don't want to be accused of 3RR, so would you do the honours? Thanks  +++$+++ :Not quite "beat you to it"... Sam S merely went back to his old favored version that was discarded long ago, and now it's just gone back to Serge's version...  We now have a clear consensus to drop "mythology" as unecessary, ambiguous and probable pov-pushing, I just don't want to be accused of 3RR, so would you do the honours? Thanks [[User:Codex Sinaiticus|ፈቃደ]] ([[User talk:Codex Sinaiticus|ውይይት]]) 23:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

540431 +++$+++ Jaakobou +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-08 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.186583700E09 +++$+++ hi, i believe you've made an honest mistake by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=149823691&oldid=149822810 inserting a \"Resolved\" tag] into my complaint on AN\/I. the issue was not that of a copyvio inserted into the complaint by [[User:Kyaa the Catlord]], but that of abusive behavior. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"teal\"> +++$+++ hi, i believe you've made an honest mistake by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=149823691&oldid=149822810 inserting a "Resolved" tag] into my complaint on AN/I. the issue was not that of a copyvio inserted into the complaint by [[User:Kyaa the Catlord]], but that of abusive behavior. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">[[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>''[[User talk:Jaakobou|Chalk Talk]]''</sup></font></b> 07:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
540432 +++$+++ Jaakobou +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540431 +++$+++ 540431 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.186677120E09 +++$+++ thanks for giving this a look. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"teal\"> +++$+++ :thanks for giving this a look. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">[[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>''[[User talk:Jaakobou|Chalk Talk]]''</sup></font></b> 09:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
540433 +++$+++ Jaakobou +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540431 +++$+++ 540432 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.186681260E09 +++$+++ '''note:''' the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#offtopic offtopic of copyvio] has just been reopened. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"teal\"> +++$+++ ::'''note:''' the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#offtopic offtopic of copyvio] has just been reopened. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">[[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>''[[User talk:Jaakobou|Chalk Talk]]''</sup></font></b> 10:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
540434 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540431 +++$+++ 540433 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.186709760E09 +++$+++ Response: Can you provide me with the diffs of the abusive behavior? Making false claims about people like claiming that they participated in a massacre without evidence is a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]] that can be acted upon: just saying that because you are pro-Israel you are also pro-violence or you are pro-Palestine you are also pro-violence is just the endless rhetoric (it happens also in the abortion debate: if you vote Democrat (US), you support baby killers; if you vote Republican (US), you support second class citizenship for women, are regular rhetoric and will likely not result in a block. A personal attack is different. Again, the diffs would help, because I couldn't find them (but I only spent a few minutes, honestly). Re: copyvio, I'll look into it, but probably another admin will deal with it, I want to help but really don't want to get sucked into a general dispute that will not be resolved at WP (you probably saw my closing of the other two issues relating to the Middle East issues).  +++$+++ :::Response: Can you provide me with the diffs of the abusive behavior? Making false claims about people like claiming that they participated in a massacre without evidence is a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]] that can be acted upon: just saying that because you are pro-Israel you are also pro-violence or you are pro-Palestine you are also pro-violence is just the endless rhetoric (it happens also in the abortion debate: if you vote Democrat (US), you support baby killers; if you vote Republican (US), you support second class citizenship for women, are regular rhetoric and will likely not result in a block. A personal attack is different. Again, the diffs would help, because I couldn't find them (but I only spent a few minutes, honestly). Re: copyvio, I'll look into it, but probably another admin will deal with it, I want to help but really don't want to get sucked into a general dispute that will not be resolved at WP (you probably saw my closing of the other two issues relating to the Middle East issues). [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 18:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
540435 +++$+++ Jaakobou +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540431 +++$+++ 540434 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.186750440E09 +++$+++ i havn't seen the other ME issues, i'll perhaps spend a little time later to find a few personal attacks. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"teal\"> +++$+++ ::::i havn't seen the other ME issues, i'll perhaps spend a little time later to find a few personal attacks. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">[[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>''[[User talk:Jaakobou|Chalk Talk]]''</sup></font></b> 05:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
540436 +++$+++ Jaakobou +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540431 +++$+++ 540435 +++$+++ 2007-08-11 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.186856820E09 +++$+++ here's a new one, a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Battle_of_Jenin#We.27ve_not_even_mentioned_Sharon.27s_declared_aim repeated accusation that i was a fighting member] in the \"jenin massacre\". (he's received, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3APalestineRemembered&diff=149588634&oldid=149585818 and removed], a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:PalestineRemembered&oldid=149585818#personal_style 3rd level warning] on this one). <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"teal\"> +++$+++ :::::here's a new one, a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Battle_of_Jenin#We.27ve_not_even_mentioned_Sharon.27s_declared_aim repeated accusation that i was a fighting member] in the "jenin massacre". (he's received, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APalestineRemembered&diff=149588634&oldid=149585818 and removed], a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PalestineRemembered&oldid=149585818#personal_style 3rd level warning] on this one). <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">[[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>''[[User talk:Jaakobou|Chalk Talk]]''</sup></font></b> 11:27, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

278288 +++$+++ Monkeyman +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-02 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.141294200E09 +++$+++ Hi Mhking.  I noticed you reverted the MJ article a little while ago.  There is an ongoing discussion at [[Talk:Michael_Jackson#Nicknames]] on this nickname debate.  When you have time, can you read through the history and add any comments?  I am proposing we remove the nicknames from the opening paragraph but include them later in the article along with explanations of their origins.  I would welcome your input on this issue.  [[Image:Monkeyman.png]] +++$+++ Hi Mhking.  I noticed you reverted the MJ article a little while ago.  There is an ongoing discussion at [[Talk:Michael_Jackson#Nicknames]] on this nickname debate.  When you have time, can you read through the history and add any comments?  I am proposing we remove the nicknames from the opening paragraph but include them later in the article along with explanations of their origins.  I would welcome your input on this issue.  [[Image:Monkeyman.png]][[User:Monkeyman|Monkeyman]]<sup>([[User_talk:Monkeyman|talk]])</sup> 02:10, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
278289 +++$+++ Monkeyman +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278288 +++$+++ 278288 +++$+++ 2006-03-02 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.141295280E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your input.  Would you accept a compromise if we removed both names from the opening paragraph and included them later in the article?  My argument, as I mentioned further up in the discussion, is that we also called [[Ronald Reagan]] The Gipper, should we also include that name in his opening paragraph?  Just trying to find a solution here ...  [[Image:Monkeyman.png]] +++$+++ :Thank you for your input.  Would you accept a compromise if we removed both names from the opening paragraph and included them later in the article?  My argument, as I mentioned further up in the discussion, is that we also called [[Ronald Reagan]] The Gipper, should we also include that name in his opening paragraph?  Just trying to find a solution here ...  [[Image:Monkeyman.png]][[User:Monkeyman|Monkeyman]]<sup>([[User_talk:Monkeyman|talk]])</sup> 02:28, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
278290 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278288 +++$+++ 278289 +++$+++ 2006-03-02 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.141295460E09 +++$+++ Yes, I'd be more than happy to accept that sort of compromise. Just keep in mind that the same sort of battle will ensue there as well.  -- +++$+++ ::Yes, I'd be more than happy to accept that sort of compromise. Just keep in mind that the same sort of battle will ensue there as well.  --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] 02:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
278291 +++$+++ Monkeyman +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278288 +++$+++ 278290 +++$+++ 2006-03-02 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.141295760E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm painfully aware of that.  :)  I guess it's one compromise at a time around here.  Thanks for your input.  [[Image:Monkeyman.png]] +++$+++ :::Yeah, I'm painfully aware of that.  :)  I guess it's one compromise at a time around here.  Thanks for your input.  [[Image:Monkeyman.png]][[User:Monkeyman|Monkeyman]]<sup>([[User_talk:Monkeyman|talk]])</sup> 02:36, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

16145 +++$+++ Chipmunkdavis +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16145 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-25 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.301088900E09 +++$+++ The figure you removed was the total number of islands in the Philippines, so good removal, but when one discuses Luzon it could mean not only the island but also the political unit. I don't know how many islands there are in the unit, but it's definitely more than one. Hope that's useful,  +++$+++ The figure you removed was the total number of islands in the Philippines, so good removal, but when one discuses Luzon it could mean not only the island but also the political unit. I don't know how many islands there are in the unit, but it's definitely more than one. Hope that's useful, [[User:Chipmunkdavis|Chipmunkdavis]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 14:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
16146 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16145 +++$+++ 16145 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.301090520E09 +++$+++ Yes, I know. It would be better if these were covered at separate articles, less ambiguous at the very least. -- +++$+++ :Yes, I know. It would be better if these were covered at separate articles, less ambiguous at the very least. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 15:02, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
16147 +++$+++ Chipmunkdavis +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16145 +++$+++ 16146 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.301090820E09 +++$+++ I used to think like that, once thought of making a separate [[Hokkaido]] article, but in the end I couldn't justify the duplication of content to myself. In the end I figure if it covers a huge island then having small islands also included in the article wouldn't be very detrimental.  +++$+++ ::I used to think like that, once thought of making a separate [[Hokkaido]] article, but in the end I couldn't justify the duplication of content to myself. In the end I figure if it covers a huge island then having small islands also included in the article wouldn't be very detrimental. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|Chipmunkdavis]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 15:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
16148 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16145 +++$+++ 16147 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.301095380E09 +++$+++ Well, if the geographical info in the article on the political unit is carefully kept to what's absolutely necessary (maybe a paragraph or two) and vice versa, it should be possible to have minimal content forking. I do concur, however, that having an article on the huge island cover also the small nearby islands wouldn't necessarily have to be very detrimental. In the case of [[Luzon]], though, I'd say it would be best to have two articles, one on the island and one on the archipelago, and note that the latter is dominated by the former, keeping the info on the separate subjects as restricted to their respective articles as much as the situation allows. A lot of care would be needed to decide what info goes where, but it should be possible. -- +++$+++ :::Well, if the geographical info in the article on the political unit is carefully kept to what's absolutely necessary (maybe a paragraph or two) and vice versa, it should be possible to have minimal content forking. I do concur, however, that having an article on the huge island cover also the small nearby islands wouldn't necessarily have to be very detrimental. In the case of [[Luzon]], though, I'd say it would be best to have two articles, one on the island and one on the archipelago, and note that the latter is dominated by the former, keeping the info on the separate subjects as restricted to their respective articles as much as the situation allows. A lot of care would be needed to decide what info goes where, but it should be possible. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 16:23, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
16149 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16145 +++$+++ 16145 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.301945820E09 +++$+++ The source supports the wording I restored, not yours. Plus, [[Malagasy language|Malagasy]] is not part of the [[Malayan languages]]. -- +++$+++ :The source supports the wording I restored, not yours. Plus, [[Malagasy language|Malagasy]] is not part of the [[Malayan languages]]. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 12:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

550467 +++$+++ 132.205.94.174 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-25 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.122285060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:132.205.94.174|132.205.94.174]] 02:51, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
550468 +++$+++ 132.205.64.154 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550467 +++$+++ 550467 +++$+++ 2005-07-27 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.122449580E09 +++$+++ Well, I thought it fit criterion #2 under nonsense. Still, as you apparently read the article, you should have transferred it, because it makes sense as a delete candidate. That's why I thought you automatically reverted anon tagged items, as some are wont to do. As it is, the article was speedied on VfD... showing that not only was it an appropriate article to nominate, it qualified as an almost automatic delete.  +++$+++ * Well, I thought it fit criterion #2 under nonsense. Still, as you apparently read the article, you should have transferred it, because it makes sense as a delete candidate. That's why I thought you automatically reverted anon tagged items, as some are wont to do. As it is, the article was speedied on VfD... showing that not only was it an appropriate article to nominate, it qualified as an almost automatic delete. [[User:132.205.64.154|132.205.64.154]] 00:33, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
550469 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550467 +++$+++ 550468 +++$+++ 2005-07-27 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.122450600E09 +++$+++ Well, in the terminated VfD, [[User:Android79]] made pretty clear that he thought it wasn't speediable either. I talked to the speedying admin (who has another message enquiring about strange speedies, but is a respected Wikipedian, [[User:The Epopt]]) who offered to restore the article, but I didn't push the issue since it was evidently deletable. I think perhaps the bit about being a Wikipedian's pet phrase managed to not register with me (or was not there) when I first came across the article, and so having followed the Wikilinks, I concluded it was a minor, but not invented, thing\/place. Can I encourage to [[Special:Userlogin|get an account]]; it make communication much easier! - +++$+++ **Well, in the terminated VfD, [[User:Android79]] made pretty clear that he thought it wasn't speediable either. I talked to the speedying admin (who has another message enquiring about strange speedies, but is a respected Wikipedian, [[User:The Epopt]]) who offered to restore the article, but I didn't push the issue since it was evidently deletable. I think perhaps the bit about being a Wikipedian's pet phrase managed to not register with me (or was not there) when I first came across the article, and so having followed the Wikilinks, I concluded it was a minor, but not invented, thing/place. Can I encourage to [[Special:Userlogin|get an account]]; it make communication much easier! -[[User:Splash|Splash]] 00:50, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
550470 +++$+++ 132.205.3.20 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550467 +++$+++ 550469 +++$+++ 2005-07-27 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.122524760E09 +++$+++ Considering what happens on VfD, I've come to believe an account is elitist, because of the exclusionary practices based on blanket cancelling of anon statements by some registered users, so I wasn't planning on getting an account.  +++$+++ ***Considering what happens on VfD, I've come to believe an account is elitist, because of the exclusionary practices based on blanket cancelling of anon statements by some registered users, so I wasn't planning on getting an account. [[User:132.205.3.20|132.205.3.20]] 21:26, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
550471 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550467 +++$+++ 550470 +++$+++ 2005-07-27 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.122524880E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. - +++$+++ ****Fair enough. -[[User:Splash|Splash]] 21:28, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

278292 +++$+++ Kingboyk +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278292 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-09 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.141897080E09 +++$+++ [[User:Siddhartha21]] has edited [[Special:Contributions\/Siddhartha21|once only today]] and it's a content dispute not vandalism. Please don't post such issues on [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism]]. That board is meant for alerting admins to vandals who are rampaging through the site \"right here, right now\". To report complex problems like this go to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents]]. If the editor has broken the [[WP:3RR|3RR]] rule report it to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/3RR]]. -- +++$+++ [[User:Siddhartha21]] has edited [[Special:Contributions/Siddhartha21|once only today]] and it's a content dispute not vandalism. Please don't post such issues on [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism]]. That board is meant for alerting admins to vandals who are rampaging through the site "right here, right now". To report complex problems like this go to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]. If the editor has broken the [[WP:3RR|3RR]] rule report it to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR]]. --[[User:Kingboyk|kingboyk]] 01:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
278293 +++$+++ Kingboyk +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278292 +++$+++ 278292 +++$+++ 2006-03-09 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.141901580E09 +++$+++ That's alright. Think of it as calling 911 (which you did) rather than just leaving a message at the local police station and asking them to check this out when they've got a moment :-) No harm done, thanks for writing to me. -- +++$+++ :That's alright. Think of it as calling 911 (which you did) rather than just leaving a message at the local police station and asking them to check this out when they've got a moment :-) No harm done, thanks for writing to me. --[[User:Kingboyk|kingboyk]] 02:53, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

570670 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-21 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.237659240E09 +++$+++ Care to take the issues brought up in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:3O&curid=12645902&diff=278575431&oldid=278510130 this edit summary] to [[WT:TC#Standardisation of template styling|the discussion]], or suggest a better place to have it? I first brought the subject up over four months ago, and it's pretty well-deployed across most high profile message boxes now (which required a great many requests for editprotected). To say that I'm \"currently enforcing\" it makes it sound like I'm pushing this out against the wishes of others, when there's been very little in the way of opposition even given that many opportunities.  +++$+++ Care to take the issues brought up in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:3O&curid=12645902&diff=278575431&oldid=278510130 this edit summary] to [[WT:TC#Standardisation of template styling|the discussion]], or suggest a better place to have it? I first brought the subject up over four months ago, and it's pretty well-deployed across most high profile message boxes now (which required a great many requests for editprotected). To say that I'm "currently enforcing" it makes it sound like I'm pushing this out against the wishes of others, when there's been very little in the way of opposition even given that many opportunities. [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 11:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
570671 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570670 +++$+++ 570670 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.237795080E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 00:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
570672 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570670 +++$+++ 570671 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.237835880E09 +++$+++ It wasn't meant as a complaint so much as a genuine request that any issues are brought to a forum where they can be discussed to resolution rather than hinted at in a way where they can't. And yes, I'm doing most of the deployment - but there's nothing wrong with that, so long as it isn't opposed. Lots of thankless work is performed by single editors around here, as I'm sure you're aware. :)  +++$+++ :: It wasn't meant as a complaint so much as a genuine request that any issues are brought to a forum where they can be discussed to resolution rather than hinted at in a way where they can't. And yes, I'm doing most of the deployment - but there's nothing wrong with that, so long as it isn't opposed. Lots of thankless work is performed by single editors around here, as I'm sure you're aware. :) [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 12:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
570673 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570670 +++$+++ 570672 +++$+++ 2009-03-24 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.237879920E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 00:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

16151 +++$+++ Ckatz +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16151 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-21 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.308710760E09 +++$+++ FYI, I've tweaked your edit to standardize on British English (\"colour\") instead of the US \"color\". Thanks for catching the inconsistency; however, looking back through the article history, it appears to use British English from at least five years ago. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ FYI, I've tweaked your edit to standardize on British English ("colour") instead of the US "color". Thanks for catching the inconsistency; however, looking back through the article history, it appears to use British English from at least five years ago. Cheers. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 19:46, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
16152 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16151 +++$+++ 16151 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.308722580E09 +++$+++ Please try to take care not to also revert some unrelated changes in the process. -- +++$+++ :Please try to take care not to also revert some unrelated changes in the process. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 23:03, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

16153 +++$+++ Kleeblatt +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16153 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-30 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.309463280E09 +++$+++ Greetings  +++$+++ Greetings [[User:Kleeblatt|Kleeblatt]] ([[User talk:Kleeblatt|talk]]) 12:48, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
16154 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16153 +++$+++ 16153 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309463640E09 +++$+++ I merely found it and put it in because it's much more legible than the map that was already there. I suspect it's pretty easy to change the map I've put in the article to combine it with the one you've linked to. I could look at it this weekend. -- +++$+++ :I merely found it and put it in because it's much more legible than the map that was already there. I suspect it's pretty easy to change the map I've put in the article to combine it with the one you've linked to. I could look at it this weekend. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 12:54, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

278298 +++$+++ Fallout boy +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278298 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-16 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.142507640E09 +++$+++ If you are unsure of his win for this award, you can verify it [http:\/\/www.razzies.com\/asp\/directory\/25thWinners.htm here].-- +++$+++ If you are unsure of his win for this award, you can verify it [http://www.razzies.com/asp/directory/25thWinners.htm here].--[[User:Fallout boy|Fallout boy]] 03:14, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
278299 +++$+++ Fallout boy +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278298 +++$+++ 278298 +++$+++ 2006-03-16 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.142511000E09 +++$+++ If you are interested, you may also add input here: [[Talk:George_W._Bush#Worst_Actor_Razzie]]. -- +++$+++ *If you are interested, you may also add input here: [[Talk:George_W._Bush#Worst_Actor_Razzie]]. --[[User:Fallout boy|Fallout boy]] 04:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

16155 +++$+++ Buachamer +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16155 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.312434180E09 +++$+++ Hi, I added added two examples for the rolled r in Germany. The first word \"Schmarrn\" is a Bavarian dialect word, the second is normal German. I used both examples to show that even in High German in the final sound the rolled \"r\" is used e.g. in Swiss, parts of Austria, parts of Germany and South Tyrol. So I would suggest to have both examples. One for dialect and one for High German. -- +++$+++ Hi, I added added two examples for the rolled r in Germany. The first word "Schmarrn" is a Bavarian dialect word, the second is normal German. I used both examples to show that even in High German in the final sound the rolled "r" is used e.g. in Swiss, parts of Austria, parts of Germany and South Tyrol. So I would suggest to have both examples. One for dialect and one for High German. --[[User:Buachamer|Buachamer]] ([[User talk:Buachamer|talk]]) 22:03, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
16156 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16155 +++$+++ 16155 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312434660E09 +++$+++ I think that's possible, because, if I understand it correctly, ''Schmarrn'' would need to move to its own entry under [[Bavarian language|(Austro-)Bavarian]] anyway. -- +++$+++ :I think that's possible, because, if I understand it correctly, ''Schmarrn'' would need to move to its own entry under [[Bavarian language|(Austro-)Bavarian]] anyway. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 22:11, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

could not match злобин п.с.
16157 +++$+++ злобин п.с. +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.312590480E09 +++$+++ Do you think that all readers of Wikipedia fully understand the difference between Votes and Votyaks? Or between the Votic language (''\u0432\u043e\u0434\u044c, \u0432\u043e\u0434\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u044f\u0437\u044b\u043a'', \u0442.\u0436. ''\u0412\u043e\u0434\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f'', \u043d\u043e \u0438 ''\u0412\u043e\u0442\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u043f\u044f\u0442\u0438\u043d\u0430''!) and the Votyak language (''\u0432\u043e\u0442\u044c, \u0432\u043e\u0442\u044f\u043a\u0438, \u043e\u0442\u044f\u043a\u0438; \u0432\u043e\u0442\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439'' \u0438\u043b\u0438 ''\u0432\u043e\u0442\u044f\u0446\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u044f\u0437\u044b\u043a''). As far as I know, they are very often mixed up in consonance outside Russia. -- +++$+++ Do you think that all readers of Wikipedia fully understand the difference between Votes and Votyaks? Or between the Votic language (''водь, водский язык'', т.ж. ''Водская'', но и ''Вотская пятина''!) and the Votyak language (''воть, вотяки, отяки; вотский'' или ''вотяцкий язык''). As far as I know, they are very often mixed up in consonance outside Russia. --[[User:Злобин П.С.|Злобин П.С.]] ([[User talk:Злобин П.С.|talk]]) 17:28, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
16158 +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ JorisvS +++$+++ 16157 +++$+++ 16157 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312591500E09 +++$+++ No. But when such a \"not to be confused with ...\" is necessary it should be a) at the top of the page ([[wikt:cf.|cf.]] the format at [[Kele language (New Guinea)]], and b) it should be clear why it is necessary. And Votyak as an alt name for [[Udmurt language|Udmurt]] was (is) not mentioned in the article about it, making the comment come [[wikt:out of the blue|out of the blue]]. But I guess I may have been a bit lazy for not looking into it and trying to address these things myself. -- +++$+++ :No. But when such a "not to be confused with ..." is necessary it should be a) at the top of the page ([[wikt:cf.|cf.]] the format at [[Kele language (New Guinea)]], and b) it should be clear why it is necessary. And Votyak as an alt name for [[Udmurt language|Udmurt]] was (is) not mentioned in the article about it, making the comment come [[wikt:out of the blue|out of the blue]]. But I guess I may have been a bit lazy for not looking into it and trying to address these things myself. --[[User:JorisvS|JorisvS]] ([[User talk:JorisvS#top|talk]]) 17:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

278302 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-25 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.145983080E09 +++$+++ Hey Michael, thanks for your message. No, I do not think you have been out of line; not at all. I agree wholeheartedly about Siddhartha. Fortunately he has now been IP blocked for one month. But he emailed the mailing list claiming the block was \"unjustifiable\" and \"without warning or vindication\". I replied saying he was warned numerous times by numerous people. I'm just hoping another admin doesn't unblock him--it would be nice to have a month free of his game playing. Regarding an RfC, I think we should probably put that on hold pending the outcome of the block. Don't worry, I know that you are acting in good faith and I also agree that it appears he is not. I looked at his contributions the other day and he has very little in the way of edits to other articles. I think that says a lot about his agenda, motives etc.  +++$+++ Hey Michael, thanks for your message. No, I do not think you have been out of line; not at all. I agree wholeheartedly about Siddhartha. Fortunately he has now been IP blocked for one month. But he emailed the mailing list claiming the block was "unjustifiable" and "without warning or vindication". I replied saying he was warned numerous times by numerous people. I'm just hoping another admin doesn't unblock him--it would be nice to have a month free of his game playing. Regarding an RfC, I think we should probably put that on hold pending the outcome of the block. Don't worry, I know that you are acting in good faith and I also agree that it appears he is not. I looked at his contributions the other day and he has very little in the way of edits to other articles. I think that says a lot about his agenda, motives etc. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 09:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
278303 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278302 +++$+++ 278302 +++$+++ 2006-04-25 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.146015660E09 +++$+++ Funny how we seem to be responsible for his behaviour. lol.  +++$+++ :Funny how we seem to be responsible for his behaviour. lol. [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 18:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

16160 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-08 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.202499180E09 +++$+++ Hi there Im schism. I see what you're doing now with the ISKCON categories, by sorting them into sub-groups and removing super-categories it makes it much more organised. :-) I wasn't sure with some figures who exist both within ISKCON, and are also well-known as Gaudiya figures in their own right, outside of the ISKCON framework. Should they be in both categories? i.e Jayapataka Swami and Radhanath Swami, and also Tamal Krsna Goswami? What are your thoughts? Regards, ys,  +++$+++ Hi there Im schism. I see what you're doing now with the ISKCON categories, by sorting them into sub-groups and removing super-categories it makes it much more organised. :-) I wasn't sure with some figures who exist both within ISKCON, and are also well-known as Gaudiya figures in their own right, outside of the ISKCON framework. Should they be in both categories? i.e Jayapataka Swami and Radhanath Swami, and also Tamal Krsna Goswami? What are your thoughts? Regards, ys, [[User:GourangaUK|Gouranga(UK)]] ([[User talk:GourangaUK|talk]]) 11:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
16161 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.202499540E09 +++$+++ Since ISKCON is a part of Gaudiya tradition, and since the ISKCON religous figures category is a subcategory of the Gaudiya religous figures category (which is a subcategory of Hindu religious figures), then the ISKCON religious figures category alone should suffice (being thus all three). This should work for the three maharajas listed above as well. Does that sound reasonable? Thanks.  +++$+++ :Since ISKCON is a part of Gaudiya tradition, and since the ISKCON religous figures category is a subcategory of the Gaudiya religous figures category (which is a subcategory of Hindu religious figures), then the ISKCON religious figures category alone should suffice (being thus all three). This should work for the three maharajas listed above as well. Does that sound reasonable? Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 11:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
16162 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ 16161 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.202499840E09 +++$+++ Also, I've added the Hindu religious figures supercategory to ISKCON religious figures. I feel that this addresses your concern more directly. Your thoughts? Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Also, I've added the Hindu religious figures supercategory to ISKCON religious figures. I feel that this addresses your concern more directly. Your thoughts? Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 11:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
16163 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ 16162 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.202583000E09 +++$+++ That makes sense to me.  Nice work on sorting it all out. Regards,  +++$+++ ::: That makes sense to me.  Nice work on sorting it all out. Regards, [[User:GourangaUK|Gouranga(UK)]] ([[User talk:GourangaUK|talk]]) 10:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
16164 +++$+++ 79.97.0.103 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ 16163 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.202589240E09 +++$+++ It appears as an attempt to divide ISKCON from the general tradition into some sort of NRM. Its not just a bad PR. [[Special:Contributions\/79.97.0.103|79.97.0.103]] ( +++$+++ :::: It appears as an attempt to divide ISKCON from the general tradition into some sort of NRM. Its not just a bad PR. [[Special:Contributions/79.97.0.103|79.97.0.103]] ([[User talk:79.97.0.103|talk]]) 12:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
16165 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ 16164 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.202589540E09 +++$+++ I don't really understand your comments. What is the \"general tradition\" you are refering to? The ISKCON religous figures Category is a subcategory of both Gaudiya Vaishnavism and Hindu religious figures. What role are you saying that NRMs have in ANY of these categories? Thanks.  +++$+++ ::::: I don't really understand your comments. What is the "general tradition" you are refering to? The ISKCON religous figures Category is a subcategory of both Gaudiya Vaishnavism and Hindu religious figures. What role are you saying that NRMs have in ANY of these categories? Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 12:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
16166 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.202622480E09 +++$+++ '''PLEASE''', You need to read up on how categories work on Wikipedia, you are completely misunderstanding the process. These categories have nothing to do with NRMs. You are really coming out of left field on that one!!!  +++$+++ :::::::'''PLEASE''', You need to read up on how categories work on Wikipedia, you are completely misunderstanding the process. These categories have nothing to do with NRMs. You are really coming out of left field on that one!!! [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 21:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
16167 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.202700960E09 +++$+++ The above anonymous comments are from [[User talk:Wikidas\u200e]], a socketpuppet user. Also, Wikidas used the same puppet to vandalize the [[I-Foundation]] page. Thanks.  +++$+++ *The above anonymous comments are from [[User talk:Wikidas‎]], a socketpuppet user. Also, Wikidas used the same puppet to vandalize the [[I-Foundation]] page. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 19:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
16168 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.202701680E09 +++$+++ Wikidas, SineBots can track you down, you might as well sign you name.  +++$+++ *Wikidas, SineBots can track you down, you might as well sign you name. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 19:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
16169 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ 16160 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.202703960E09 +++$+++ Wikidas, there are three examples on your socket puppet's talk page, [[User talk:79.97.0.103]]. These are three examples that meet the standards for a charity organization. As I stated on both your pages, articles on living persons must meet a higher criteria. Thanks.  +++$+++ *Wikidas, there are three examples on your socket puppet's talk page, [[User talk:79.97.0.103]]. These are three examples that meet the standards for a charity organization. As I stated on both your pages, articles on living persons must meet a higher criteria. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 20:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

540449 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540449 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-10 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.186809600E09 +++$+++ {{spa|70.48.241.46}}  +++$+++ {{spa|70.48.241.46}} [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 22:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
540450 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540449 +++$+++ 540449 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.186809600E09 +++$+++ It's always great when someone falsely claims to have done something useful but has not accuses anyone else intent on improving it as \"racist\".  +++$+++ *It's always great when someone falsely claims to have done something useful but has not accuses anyone else intent on improving it as "racist". [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 22:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
540451 +++$+++ 70.51.228.206 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540449 +++$+++ 540449 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.186810800E09 +++$+++ I have a dynamic IP, and have a look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Abnn&oldid=129019773 this edit summary] and then have a look at who created the guidelines for the Palestinian naming conventions you linked to in your CfD. ;-)  I think you should just dismiss me, its easier that way.  -- +++$+++ :I have a dynamic IP, and have a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Abnn&oldid=129019773 this edit summary] and then have a look at who created the guidelines for the Palestinian naming conventions you linked to in your CfD. ;-)  I think you should just dismiss me, its easier that way.  --[[User:70.51.228.206|70.51.228.206]] 22:40, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

278306 +++$+++ ChrisB +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278306 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-03 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.146714420E09 +++$+++ I will also point out that the straw poll only requests that votes be offered on whether the words should remain \"in the lead\".  Not \"lead sentence\" or \"lead paragraph\", simply lead.  Again, my edit keeps both nicknames in the lead, but provides context that was lacking in previous edits. --  +++$+++ I will also point out that the straw poll only requests that votes be offered on whether the words should remain "in the lead".  Not "lead sentence" or "lead paragraph", simply lead.  Again, my edit keeps both nicknames in the lead, but provides context that was lacking in previous edits. -- [[User:ChrisB|ChrisB]] 20:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
278307 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278306 +++$+++ 278306 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.146714720E09 +++$+++ Two reasons -- first off, changing the lead without discussion first is something that -- as is pointed out in the article -- something that will garner reversion; secondly, while you have moved the terms to a later point in the article, that is hardly compromise, especially while there is continuing discussion going on. -- +++$+++ :Two reasons -- first off, changing the lead without discussion first is something that -- as is pointed out in the article -- something that will garner reversion; secondly, while you have moved the terms to a later point in the article, that is hardly compromise, especially while there is continuing discussion going on. --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] 20:52, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
278308 +++$+++ ChrisB +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278306 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.146719880E09 +++$+++ I'm jumping ship on this dispute, as it seems like there's more going on here than I want to deal with.  I left one final suggestion on [[Talk:Michael Jackson]]. --  +++$+++ :::I'm jumping ship on this dispute, as it seems like there's more going on here than I want to deal with.  I left one final suggestion on [[Talk:Michael Jackson]]. -- [[User:ChrisB|ChrisB]] 22:18, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

540452 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-10 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.186811340E09 +++$+++ {{spa|70.51.228.206}}  +++$+++ {{spa|70.51.228.206}} [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 22:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
540453 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540452 +++$+++ 540452 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.186811340E09 +++$+++ And you can just call people racists because rules don't apply to you?  +++$+++ *And you can just call people racists because rules don't apply to you? [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 22:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
540454 +++$+++ 70.51.228.206 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540452 +++$+++ 540453 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.186812120E09 +++$+++ I don't know what you are talking about.  But I can understand that you may not prefer to actually address the real issue I raise.  I understand the type of games one can play on Wikipedia.  -- +++$+++ ::I don't know what you are talking about.  But I can understand that you may not prefer to actually address the real issue I raise.  I understand the type of games one can play on Wikipedia.  --[[User:70.51.228.206|70.51.228.206]] 23:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
540455 +++$+++ 70.51.228.206 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540452 +++$+++ 540452 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.186811940E09 +++$+++ Those categories you just nominated for deletion were actually created by me just before or immediately after I wrote the guidelines (you should check them) and in an attempt to be within them.  There has been a concerted campaign to delete categories with the terms Palestinian, Palestine and Palestinian territories on Wikipedia by the same few individuals.  I created the guidelines to try and stop this, but you've just warped those guidelines to say something they don't in order to get my categories deleted and those who have been pushing this campaign have gleefully supported you on this.  It's wrong on a number of levels.  I no longer contribute to this topic area since the end of May but I felt it was important to make this point to you directly.  -- +++$+++ :Those categories you just nominated for deletion were actually created by me just before or immediately after I wrote the guidelines (you should check them) and in an attempt to be within them.  There has been a concerted campaign to delete categories with the terms Palestinian, Palestine and Palestinian territories on Wikipedia by the same few individuals.  I created the guidelines to try and stop this, but you've just warped those guidelines to say something they don't in order to get my categories deleted and those who have been pushing this campaign have gleefully supported you on this.  It's wrong on a number of levels.  I no longer contribute to this topic area since the end of May but I felt it was important to make this point to you directly.  --[[User:70.51.228.206|70.51.228.206]] 22:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
540456 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540452 +++$+++ 540452 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.186812120E09 +++$+++ I've explained my rationale at the Afd. I suggest you continue your debate there. I will not respond further to anon's claiming to be someone that they apparently aren't (I've left a message at the talk page of the person you claim to be and no response of acknowledgement has been forthcoming.  +++$+++ *I've explained my rationale at the Afd. I suggest you continue your debate there. I will not respond further to anon's claiming to be someone that they apparently aren't (I've left a message at the talk page of the person you claim to be and no response of acknowledgement has been forthcoming. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 23:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

278310 +++$+++ Manboobies +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-04 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.146726240E09 +++$+++ We previously butted heads over the Nirvana article, I insisted on adding information about Cobain's singing range. Because he didn't wish to have anything on that because he has no ability to verify it, he cited original research, in as much as it can be original research to point out notes in a musical piece, by the same logic one would assume pointing out lyrics is also out of bounds. It was ludicrous, and eventually we got into the rut that he insisted that any note sung in a song could be auto tuned. I left it there as I am a musician and I know that this is impossible to do realistically - it doesn't sound good. Autotune is obvious. Listen to Sk8er boi by Lavinge? Me thinks you can hear it. Anyway I abandoned the argument, but not before he attacked the Staley article which i had given a little TLC to, and deleted my first article, I let it go because whilst the deletion and merge was not discussed as is policy and unneccessary I knew he was just trying to bait me, I gave a little nip back and clipped bits of unverifiable information from the Cobain article which he then rv'd citing it as sourced with a book which is part-fiction (Charles' cross - heavier than heaven, last part is all fiction) however he took this personally and then started wikistalking me. I ignored him and his constant interruptions and comments in every article i regularly edit however he recently jumped in my way in the MJ article - which is where you come into contact with him. I had no idea he posted this into your user page. I believe if you ignore him he'll go away eventually ;)-- +++$+++ We previously butted heads over the Nirvana article, I insisted on adding information about Cobain's singing range. Because he didn't wish to have anything on that because he has no ability to verify it, he cited original research, in as much as it can be original research to point out notes in a musical piece, by the same logic one would assume pointing out lyrics is also out of bounds. It was ludicrous, and eventually we got into the rut that he insisted that any note sung in a song could be auto tuned. I left it there as I am a musician and I know that this is impossible to do realistically - it doesn't sound good. Autotune is obvious. Listen to Sk8er boi by Lavinge? Me thinks you can hear it. Anyway I abandoned the argument, but not before he attacked the Staley article which i had given a little TLC to, and deleted my first article, I let it go because whilst the deletion and merge was not discussed as is policy and unneccessary I knew he was just trying to bait me, I gave a little nip back and clipped bits of unverifiable information from the Cobain article which he then rv'd citing it as sourced with a book which is part-fiction (Charles' cross - heavier than heaven, last part is all fiction) however he took this personally and then started wikistalking me. I ignored him and his constant interruptions and comments in every article i regularly edit however he recently jumped in my way in the MJ article - which is where you come into contact with him. I had no idea he posted this into your user page. I believe if you ignore him he'll go away eventually ;)--[[User:Manboobies|Manboobies]] 00:04, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
278311 +++$+++ ChrisB +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278310 +++$+++ 278310 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.146741960E09 +++$+++ HOLY FUCKING CRAP.  Are you insane?  Dude, I'm done.  This is not what happened ''at all''.  I'm not even going to get into it - Mhking, just read [[User_talk:Manboobies\/Archive001]] and the last section of [[Talk:Nirvana_(band)]] and see what I ''actually'' said.  Reading this, now ''I'm'' completely freaked out. --  +++$+++ :HOLY FUCKING CRAP.  Are you insane?  Dude, I'm done.  This is not what happened ''at all''.  I'm not even going to get into it - Mhking, just read [[User_talk:Manboobies/Archive001]] and the last section of [[Talk:Nirvana_(band)]] and see what I ''actually'' said.  Reading this, now ''I'm'' completely freaked out. -- [[User:ChrisB|ChrisB]] 04:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
278312 +++$+++ ChrisB +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278310 +++$+++ 278310 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.146745920E09 +++$+++ I can't imagine that you care about this, but there's more in the locations noted.  Apologies for intruding on your talk page. --  +++$+++ :I can't imagine that you care about this, but there's more in the locations noted.  Apologies for intruding on your talk page. -- [[User:ChrisB|ChrisB]] 05:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
278313 +++$+++ Manboobies +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278310 +++$+++ 278312 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.146746460E09 +++$+++ to quote you, verbatim in one of your many million offensive comments: \"Whose fucking version of \"accuracy\" are you talking about?\" [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABalooUrsidae&diff=38725042&oldid=38721267]-- +++$+++ ::to quote you, verbatim in one of your many million offensive comments: "Whose fucking version of "accuracy" are you talking about?" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABalooUrsidae&diff=38725042&oldid=38721267]--[[User:Manboobies|Manboobies]] 05:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
278314 +++$+++ Manboobies +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278310 +++$+++ 278312 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.146747600E09 +++$+++ also, it's not possible to do what you say and have it sound good. Yes, I have been near studio equipment, I have my own small studio, I've been in many, including some very big ones. Nobody uses tape any more. And again, the only record I can think that used speeding up the tape to good effect is Bohemian Rhapsody. Now, does that F#5 sound good to you? No. It sounds like a fast forwarded C4, which it is. I don't see the point in arguing with you, you're such a troll, you're always baiting people, your talk page is full chocka block with people complaining about your behaviour and Rv'ing without asking, and when somebody points it out you flip your lid. I'm more than happy to source every little thing you've done to wiki stalk me since April. Because you would have happened upon the MJ article and started arguing over it with me normally? Had you ever touched that article before in your life? Why am I even bothering with you?-- +++$+++ ::also, it's not possible to do what you say and have it sound good. Yes, I have been near studio equipment, I have my own small studio, I've been in many, including some very big ones. Nobody uses tape any more. And again, the only record I can think that used speeding up the tape to good effect is Bohemian Rhapsody. Now, does that F#5 sound good to you? No. It sounds like a fast forwarded C4, which it is. I don't see the point in arguing with you, you're such a troll, you're always baiting people, your talk page is full chocka block with people complaining about your behaviour and Rv'ing without asking, and when somebody points it out you flip your lid. I'm more than happy to source every little thing you've done to wiki stalk me since April. Because you would have happened upon the MJ article and started arguing over it with me normally? Had you ever touched that article before in your life? Why am I even bothering with you?--[[User:Manboobies|Manboobies]] 06:00, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
278315 +++$+++ ChrisB +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278310 +++$+++ 278314 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.146752820E09 +++$+++ I have a response to all of this, but I'll take it to [[User_talk:Manboobies]]. --  +++$+++ :::I have a response to all of this, but I'll take it to [[User_talk:Manboobies]]. -- [[User:ChrisB|ChrisB]] 07:27, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

614364 +++$+++ Cla68 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-06 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.281084360E09 +++$+++ Please consider signing the CC restriction, as explained [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:General_sanctions\/Climate_change_probation\/Requests_for_enforcement#Sign_up_for_the_CC_restriction here].  +++$+++ Please consider signing the CC restriction, as explained [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:General_sanctions/Climate_change_probation/Requests_for_enforcement#Sign_up_for_the_CC_restriction here]. [[User:Cla68|Cla68]] ([[User talk:Cla68|talk]]) 01:46, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
614365 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614364 +++$+++ 614364 +++$+++ 2010-08-06 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.281138780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up, Cla, I'll consider it. Will request a couple of clarifications. .  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up, Cla, I'll consider it. Will request a couple of clarifications. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 16:53, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

16170 +++$+++ Chopper Dave +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-09 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.202626020E09 +++$+++ Please be more particular with your statement. Pointing out exactly what you're talking about makes it easier to correct. Thanks  +++$+++ Please be more particular with your statement. Pointing out exactly what you're talking about makes it easier to correct. Thanks [[User:Chopper Dave|Chopper Dave]] ([[User talk:Chopper Dave|talk]]) 22:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
16171 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16170 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.202626860E09 +++$+++ Here are three examples... Specifically I mean sources such as a personal website, http:\/\/www.devaswami.com or a blogspot such as, http:\/\/prabhupada.blogspot.com\/2007_04_08_archive.html or editorials such as, http:\/\/www.dandavats.com\/?p=1840. I do not believe that these would ever qualify as independent [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Here are three examples... Specifically I mean sources such as a personal website, http://www.devaswami.com or a blogspot such as, http://prabhupada.blogspot.com/2007_04_08_archive.html or editorials such as, http://www.dandavats.com/?p=1840. I do not believe that these would ever qualify as independent [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]]. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 23:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

16172 +++$+++ 79.97.0.103 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16172 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-10 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.202702400E09 +++$+++ {{BLPsources|date=March 2008}} can be used on practically any BLP page. What is the point?[[Special:Contributions\/79.97.0.103|79.97.0.103]] ( +++$+++ {{BLPsources|date=March 2008}} can be used on practically any BLP page. What is the point?[[Special:Contributions/79.97.0.103|79.97.0.103]] ([[User talk:79.97.0.103|talk]]) 20:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
16173 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16172 +++$+++ 16172 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.202702940E09 +++$+++ Please feel free to read [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]], this will explain to you wikipedia's policy on biographies on living persons. Each statement made in such an article must come from an independent reliable source. The above tag can, and will eventually, be placed on all articles who do not meet these strict requirements. These are Wikipedia's rules, not mine. To be constructive we should all use them as tools and guides in making our editing choices. Thanks.  +++$+++ *Please feel free to read [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]], this will explain to you wikipedia's policy on biographies on living persons. Each statement made in such an article must come from an independent reliable source. The above tag can, and will eventually, be placed on all articles who do not meet these strict requirements. These are Wikipedia's rules, not mine. To be constructive we should all use them as tools and guides in making our editing choices. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 20:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
16174 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16172 +++$+++ 16173 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.202707740E09 +++$+++ Dear Ism schism, I feel you are being very excessive with adding fact tags. Would it not be more constructive that when you find an article which needs references, either you add one banner at the top of the article, or even better, you try and find some sources? Especially if what is being said sounds factual, and non-controversial in it's nature. Otherwise we are just making more work for ourselves? Regards,  +++$+++ ::Dear Ism schism, I feel you are being very excessive with adding fact tags. Would it not be more constructive that when you find an article which needs references, either you add one banner at the top of the article, or even better, you try and find some sources? Especially if what is being said sounds factual, and non-controversial in it's nature. Otherwise we are just making more work for ourselves? Regards, [[User:GourangaUK|Gouranga(UK)]] ([[User talk:GourangaUK|talk]]) 21:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
16175 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16172 +++$+++ 16174 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.202708640E09 +++$+++ Gouranga, I appreciate your concern. My edits were to point out the lack of references cited at the end of a statement of point which the article made. I have to disagree with you, there is much work to be done and standards should not be lowered. I added fact tags where I saw no reference cited. When a novice reads this information on wikipedia they need to have a source from which this information comes from, it can not just be what a person writes down, even if it is common knowledge to a particular religious community, it has to come from a reliable sources that has a citation. FYI, I feel that our time might be better spent finding real [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]] for [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::Gouranga, I appreciate your concern. My edits were to point out the lack of references cited at the end of a statement of point which the article made. I have to disagree with you, there is much work to be done and standards should not be lowered. I added fact tags where I saw no reference cited. When a novice reads this information on wikipedia they need to have a source from which this information comes from, it can not just be what a person writes down, even if it is common knowledge to a particular religious community, it has to come from a reliable sources that has a citation. FYI, I feel that our time might be better spent finding real [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]] for [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]]. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 21:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
16176 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16172 +++$+++ 16174 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.202708820E09 +++$+++ It takes mere seconds to add fact tags. It could take some time to find correct sources. By adding them in so many places I really don't think you are not helping. Not unless there is something very controversial, or seemingly out-of-place written in the article. Regards,  +++$+++ :::It takes mere seconds to add fact tags. It could take some time to find correct sources. By adding them in so many places I really don't think you are not helping. Not unless there is something very controversial, or seemingly out-of-place written in the article. Regards, [[User:GourangaUK|Gouranga(UK)]] ([[User talk:GourangaUK|talk]]) 21:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
16177 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16172 +++$+++ 16176 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.202711220E09 +++$+++ I agree with the obvious that it takes mere seconds to add fact tags and a minute to AfD a group. However it takes much longer for Verifiability to be established. Considering that there are no Vaisnava peer-reviewed journals and very few biographical books published in university presses, and that newspapers often are self-published sources as was the case of promoting [[I-foundation]], we should allow for any other sources other then self-published and questionable sources. Also BLP should allow for material by persons described and we should not require high-quality reliable sources for each and every ISKCON or otherwise Swami. That just does not make any sense onless one is motivated to do this under the letter of the law of the WIKI.  +++$+++ ::::I agree with the obvious that it takes mere seconds to add fact tags and a minute to AfD a group. However it takes much longer for Verifiability to be established. Considering that there are no Vaisnava peer-reviewed journals and very few biographical books published in university presses, and that newspapers often are self-published sources as was the case of promoting [[I-foundation]], we should allow for any other sources other then self-published and questionable sources. Also BLP should allow for material by persons described and we should not require high-quality reliable sources for each and every ISKCON or otherwise Swami. That just does not make any sense onless one is motivated to do this under the letter of the law of the WIKI. [[User:Wikidas|Wikidas]] ([[User talk:Wikidas|talk]]) 22:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
16178 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16172 +++$+++ 16177 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.202711460E09 +++$+++ Unlike your articles, the [[I-Foundation]] article is properly referenced with [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]]. I suggest you use it as an example if you want to show people that the articles you write are truly notable and reliably sourced. Thanks and come again.  +++$+++ :::::Unlike your articles, the [[I-Foundation]] article is properly referenced with [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]]. I suggest you use it as an example if you want to show people that the articles you write are truly notable and reliably sourced. Thanks and come again. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 22:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
16179 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16172 +++$+++ 16178 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.202712960E09 +++$+++ I doubt if the stub-like [[I-Foundation]] article is what [[Jimbo Wales]] had in mind when he invented Wikipedia! I really don't see your point? Wikidas is speaking common-sense.  +++$+++ :::::: I doubt if the stub-like [[I-Foundation]] article is what [[Jimbo Wales]] had in mind when he invented Wikipedia! I really don't see your point? Wikidas is speaking common-sense. [[User:GourangaUK|Gouranga(UK)]] ([[User talk:GourangaUK|talk]]) 22:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
16180 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16172 +++$+++ 16179 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.202713140E09 +++$+++ That is because [[User talk: Wikidas]], [[User talk: 79.97.0.103]], [[User talk:MBest-son\u200e]] and you are all the same person. All four of you should use [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]] and [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::::::That is because [[User talk: Wikidas]], [[User talk: 79.97.0.103]], [[User talk:MBest-son‎]] and you are all the same person. All four of you should use [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]] and [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]]. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 22:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

540461 +++$+++ Miskwito +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-11 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.186819860E09 +++$+++ Hi. I note you didn't speedy delete [[Hoca\u0436e\u043a]], instead PRODding it and notifying the page for translations. It's quite evident to me that the page is not written in any existing language. For one thing, it's a mix of Cyrillic and Latin characters. For another, some of the Cyrillic characters (such as [[\u0452]] and [[\u0493]]) are essentially unique to a single existing language (and not the same language). And finally, it has acute and grave marks on some vowels and consonants (\xe8, \u045c, \u045d, etc.), which to my knowledge don't exist in <s>any<\/s> many languages using the Cyrillic alphabet. Sending it to Pages Needing Translation is rather pointless, since the only person who knows the language the page is written in is its author (who has a history of adding pages on his [[conlang]] ([[Silanian]]), which, if you'll note, uses the same [[User:Shalom\/Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense\/Silanian|idiosyncratic Cyrillic symbols]]). I see that I either misread or forgot the details of CSD A2, which is only for foreign language articles that exist on other Wikipedia projects, although I'm wondering if [[Hoca\u0436e\u043a]] qualifies as vandalism, given what the \"Non-criteria\" section of the CSD page says on hoaxes: \"Occasionally these can be deleted as vandalism if the article is obviously ridiculous, but remotely plausible articles should be subjected to further scrutiny in a wider forum.\" In any case, I'll respect and certainly understand your decision regarding rejecting the speedy deletion in favor of a PROD, though I do think that submitting it to Pages Needing Translation is a waste of time. Take care, -- +++$+++ Hi. I note you didn't speedy delete [[Hocaжeк]], instead PRODding it and notifying the page for translations. It's quite evident to me that the page is not written in any existing language. For one thing, it's a mix of Cyrillic and Latin characters. For another, some of the Cyrillic characters (such as [[ђ]] and [[ғ]]) are essentially unique to a single existing language (and not the same language). And finally, it has acute and grave marks on some vowels and consonants (è, ќ, ѝ, etc.), which to my knowledge don't exist in <s>any</s> many languages using the Cyrillic alphabet. Sending it to Pages Needing Translation is rather pointless, since the only person who knows the language the page is written in is its author (who has a history of adding pages on his [[conlang]] ([[Silanian]]), which, if you'll note, uses the same [[User:Shalom/Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense/Silanian|idiosyncratic Cyrillic symbols]]). I see that I either misread or forgot the details of CSD A2, which is only for foreign language articles that exist on other Wikipedia projects, although I'm wondering if [[Hocaжeк]] qualifies as vandalism, given what the "Non-criteria" section of the CSD page says on hoaxes: "Occasionally these can be deleted as vandalism if the article is obviously ridiculous, but remotely plausible articles should be subjected to further scrutiny in a wider forum." In any case, I'll respect and certainly understand your decision regarding rejecting the speedy deletion in favor of a PROD, though I do think that submitting it to Pages Needing Translation is a waste of time. Take care, --[[User:Miskwito|Miskwito]] 01:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
540462 +++$+++ Miskwito +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540461 +++$+++ 540461 +++$+++ 2007-08-11 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.186820700E09 +++$+++ Oh, I just noticed, on [[Silanian]], the page on his conlang, he writes \"Silanian (Xc\u045d\u043b'\u043de) is a language created by a seventeen year old boy named Jason Heffernan ('''Silanian name Hoca\u0436e\u043a, Nosajek''')\" (emphasis mine). That utterly clinches it for me that the article is written in a constructed language, Silanian, and not a natural one -- +++$+++ :Oh, I just noticed, on [[Silanian]], the page on his conlang, he writes "Silanian (Xcѝл'нe) is a language created by a seventeen year old boy named Jason Heffernan ('''Silanian name Hocaжeк, Nosajek''')" (emphasis mine). That utterly clinches it for me that the article is written in a constructed language, Silanian, and not a natural one --[[User:Miskwito|Miskwito]] 01:25, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
540463 +++$+++ Miskwito +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540461 +++$+++ 540462 +++$+++ 2007-08-11 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.186821960E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I know \"hoax\" isn't a criterion for speedy deletion, but since you had theorized that it might be in Serbian, I thought I'd at least let you know what made me decide it was fake. But yeah, hopefully in five days it'll be deleted. Take care, -- +++$+++ ::Yeah, I know "hoax" isn't a criterion for speedy deletion, but since you had theorized that it might be in Serbian, I thought I'd at least let you know what made me decide it was fake. But yeah, hopefully in five days it'll be deleted. Take care, --[[User:Miskwito|Miskwito]] 01:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

278318 +++$+++ Figaro +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-06 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.146948300E09 +++$+++ By your actions in reverting to a previous edit by [[VandalProof]], you have now unfairly and untruthfully branded me a vandal, which is something I did hot deserve.  Your removal of the link was virtually immediate (going by the history page) on my adding the link to John Cleese's page, so it would appear that you did not even give me the courtesy of checking the link before you swooped into action.  +++$+++ By your actions in reverting to a previous edit by [[VandalProof]], you have now unfairly and untruthfully branded me a vandal, which is something I did hot deserve.  Your removal of the link was virtually immediate (going by the history page) on my adding the link to John Cleese's page, so it would appear that you did not even give me the courtesy of checking the link before you swooped into action. [[User:Figaro|Figaro]] 13:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
278319 +++$+++ Figaro +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278318 +++$+++ 278318 +++$+++ 2006-05-06 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.146953220E09 +++$+++ Thank you for writing to me and explaining what happened.  I appreciate it very much. I know how difficult things can be sometimes with children about :-)  All the best  +++$+++ :Thank you for writing to me and explaining what happened.  I appreciate it very much. I know how difficult things can be sometimes with children about :-)  All the best [[User:Figaro|Figaro]] 15:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

526984 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526984 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.203154920E09 +++$+++ OOPs, thanks for letting me know.  I will go back and fix those.  I thought it was the other way around. Please let me now if you catch anything else.-- +++$+++ OOPs, thanks for letting me know.  I will go back and fix those.  I thought it was the other way around. Please let me now if you catch anything else.--[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 01:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
526985 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526984 +++$+++ 526984 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.203194880E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for letting me know I have fixed that problem also.  -- +++$+++ :Thanks again for letting me know I have fixed that problem also.  --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 12:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

278324 +++$+++ Pgk +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-13 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.147584240E09 +++$+++ What was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemoncat&diff=prev&oldid=53061227 this edit] about? -- +++$+++ What was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemoncat&diff=prev&oldid=53061227 this edit] about? --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">[[User_talk:Pgk|talk]]</font>)</sup> 22:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
278325 +++$+++ Pgk +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278324 +++$+++ 278324 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.147584540E09 +++$+++ You were trying to remove me tagging the indef blocked user notice as vandalism? You did succeed and I restored it right after protecting the page, the user is indef blocked for creating a string of articles an example of which I gave on the page (now all deleted) -- +++$+++ : You were trying to remove me tagging the indef blocked user notice as vandalism? You did succeed and I restored it right after protecting the page, the user is indef blocked for creating a string of articles an example of which I gave on the page (now all deleted) --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">[[User_talk:Pgk|talk]]</font>)</sup> 22:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
278326 +++$+++ Pgk +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278324 +++$+++ 278325 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.147585020E09 +++$+++ It's not a problem, I was just somewhat confused. The reason for posting one of the full links is that deleted edits don't show up in the persons contributions, so anyone looking at it will wonder what vandalism they were blocked for, admins can see deleted edits so will know... -- +++$+++ :: It's not a problem, I was just somewhat confused. The reason for posting one of the full links is that deleted edits don't show up in the persons contributions, so anyone looking at it will wonder what vandalism they were blocked for, admins can see deleted edits so will know... --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">[[User_talk:Pgk|talk]]</font>)</sup> 22:37, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

16181 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-11 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.202760960E09 +++$+++ Best Regards,  +++$+++ Best Regards, [[User:GourangaUK|Gouranga(UK)]] ([[User talk:GourangaUK|talk]]) 12:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
16182 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16181 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.203225600E09 +++$+++ To make sure as many devotees as possible survive on the Wiki. I had a look, and vast ammounts of Bio or any other info that is created in WIKI DOES survive, even its not '\"at all notable'' if compared with Religious Figures or BLP that we talk about. To '''MAKE IT SURVIVE''' we should place decent references, and any reference that is accepted verifiable ''will'' prove notability in case of a religious figure, so I have changed my attitude and will act upon the above.  +++$+++ :: To make sure as many devotees as possible survive on the Wiki. I had a look, and vast ammounts of Bio or any other info that is created in WIKI DOES survive, even its not '"at all notable'' if compared with Religious Figures or BLP that we talk about. To '''MAKE IT SURVIVE''' we should place decent references, and any reference that is accepted verifiable ''will'' prove notability in case of a religious figure, so I have changed my attitude and will act upon the above. [[User:Wikidas|Wikidas]] ([[User talk:Wikidas|talk]]) 21:20, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
16183 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16181 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.203226200E09 +++$+++ Wikidas, I appreciate your concern and your contributions as an editor. For future articles, all of us editors should probably consult [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources\/Noticeboard]] every now and then, as this might be a good way to assure sources contribute to the notability of the article. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::Wikidas, I appreciate your concern and your contributions as an editor. For future articles, all of us editors should probably consult [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard]] every now and then, as this might be a good way to assure sources contribute to the notability of the article. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 21:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
16184 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16181 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-19 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.203464460E09 +++$+++ Hello Ism schism, I appreciate your consulting of Wikipedia's notability guidelines, but from my perspective, when I know perfectly well that someone is notable it is somewhat frustrating when other editors (who are fairly new to Wikipedia) seem intent on deleting an article about them. The only way around this is to provide references I agree. Maybe taking each article in turn would be a useful approach? Regards,  +++$+++ :::: Hello Ism schism, I appreciate your consulting of Wikipedia's notability guidelines, but from my perspective, when I know perfectly well that someone is notable it is somewhat frustrating when other editors (who are fairly new to Wikipedia) seem intent on deleting an article about them. The only way around this is to provide references I agree. Maybe taking each article in turn would be a useful approach? Regards, [[User:GourangaUK|Gouranga(UK)]] ([[User talk:GourangaUK|talk]]) 15:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
16185 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16181 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.203928080E09 +++$+++ Gouranga, that sounds like a good idea. What direction would you advise? Thanks.  +++$+++ ::::: Gouranga, that sounds like a good idea. What direction would you advise? Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 00:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

278328 +++$+++ 68.124.65.69 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-14 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.147593360E09 +++$+++ See [[Red Tape (disambiguation)|that page]] again. Look at the link while you're at it. I think you're a little quick to pull the trigger - 10 minutes would have been enough to see the link working.  +++$+++ See [[Red Tape (disambiguation)|that page]] again. Look at the link while you're at it. I think you're a little quick to pull the trigger - 10 minutes would have been enough to see the link working. [[User:68.124.65.69|68.124.65.69]] 00:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
278329 +++$+++ 68.124.65.69 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278328 +++$+++ 278328 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.147593960E09 +++$+++ I took a look over your talkpage, and contributions history, Mhking. Looks like you've been a vandalcop for all of 9 days now and you have pissed off tons of (apparently) legitimate users. Nice going! I wonder: Are other users of vandalproof generating similar amounts of complaints? Are other users of vandalproof reverting hundreds of items per day? I know it's hard to stop and read the things you're reverting when you're plowing along at scores of items per hour, but you really ought to slow down. Your carelessness isn't any kind of solution.  +++$+++ * I took a look over your talkpage, and contributions history, Mhking. Looks like you've been a vandalcop for all of 9 days now and you have pissed off tons of (apparently) legitimate users. Nice going! I wonder: Are other users of vandalproof generating similar amounts of complaints? Are other users of vandalproof reverting hundreds of items per day? I know it's hard to stop and read the things you're reverting when you're plowing along at scores of items per hour, but you really ought to slow down. Your carelessness isn't any kind of solution. [[User:68.124.65.69|68.124.65.69]] 01:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
278330 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278328 +++$+++ 278328 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.147640640E09 +++$+++ Didn't go back far enough... -- +++$+++ :Didn't go back far enough... --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] 14:04, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

540475 +++$+++ Paul Haymon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540475 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-14 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.187097900E09 +++$+++ I didn't create the article, but I was wondering why you feel that it should be deleted.  What exactly is \"nn writer\"?  Thanks.  +++$+++ I didn't create the article, but I was wondering why you feel that it should be deleted.  What exactly is "nn writer"?  Thanks. [[User:Paul Haymon|Paul Haymon]] 06:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
540476 +++$+++ Paul Haymon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540475 +++$+++ 540475 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.187152740E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  So it needs reliable sources, then.  +++$+++ :Thanks.  So it needs reliable sources, then. [[User:Paul Haymon|Paul Haymon]] 21:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

16189 +++$+++ Redtigerxyz +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16189 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-15 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.205625420E09 +++$+++ Deities like [[Vishvakarma]] and [[Ganesha]] are really not Vaishanava dieties, I didn't understand why you added the Vaishanavism Wikiproject link.-- +++$+++ Deities like [[Vishvakarma]] and [[Ganesha]] are really not Vaishanava dieties, I didn't understand why you added the Vaishanavism Wikiproject link.--[[User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] ([[User talk:Redtigerxyz|talk]]) 16:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
16190 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16189 +++$+++ 16189 +++$+++ 2008-03-15 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.205626080E09 +++$+++ The choice to add Vishvakarma is due to various Vaishnava scriptures (Mahabharata and [[Ramayana]] included) which discuss in detail his relationship to [[Krishna]]. Vishvakarma is a central character in these Vaishnava narratives. Thanks.  +++$+++ :The choice to add Vishvakarma is due to various Vaishnava scriptures (Mahabharata and [[Ramayana]] included) which discuss in detail his relationship to [[Krishna]]. Vishvakarma is a central character in these Vaishnava narratives. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 17:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
16191 +++$+++ Silverballer47 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16189 +++$+++ 16190 +++$+++ 2009-06-21 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.245632460E09 +++$+++ Nevertheless, Ganesha should not belong in the core stream of Vaishnavism. He is a devotee of Vishnu, yes, but then so are Shiva and Brahma. If you go about it in that manner, EVERY Hindu deity will fit under Vaishnavism! Perhaps some sort of subheading regarding the relationship of various deities to Vishnu is in order? Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Nevertheless, Ganesha should not belong in the core stream of Vaishnavism. He is a devotee of Vishnu, yes, but then so are Shiva and Brahma. If you go about it in that manner, EVERY Hindu deity will fit under Vaishnavism! Perhaps some sort of subheading regarding the relationship of various deities to Vishnu is in order? Thanks! [[User:Silverballer47|Silverballer47]] ([[User talk:Silverballer47|talk]]) 18:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
16192 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16189 +++$+++ 16191 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.205758440E09 +++$+++ Dear Ism schism, I really would like to talk to you about a subject that has been bothering me for months now. On the Vaishnavism article, in western scholar section; GaugangaUK put some very \"questionable\" people on the list. One that I am talking about was the head Sannyasa\/guru of the main temple and gurukula was centered in the \"Turley case\". That temple\/gurukula was one of the epicenters for the \"things\" that happened to the childern there. Please study on-line the name first listed in that section of that article. Please put a response in \"my talk\" of my user page. And, let me know what you think. I dont think this person should be listed on the Vaishnavism article. Please research him. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :::Dear Ism schism, I really would like to talk to you about a subject that has been bothering me for months now. On the Vaishnavism article, in western scholar section; GaugangaUK put some very "questionable" people on the list. One that I am talking about was the head Sannyasa/guru of the main temple and gurukula was centered in the "Turley case". That temple/gurukula was one of the epicenters for the "things" that happened to the childern there. Please study on-line the name first listed in that section of that article. Please put a response in "my talk" of my user page. And, let me know what you think. I dont think this person should be listed on the Vaishnavism article. Please research him. Sincerely, [[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 05:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
16193 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16189 +++$+++ 16191 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.205763780E09 +++$+++ I would like to put the Sri Sampradayam description of Bhakti yoga. From the time of Ramanujacharya and before, Bhakti yoga was the practise of regular Ashtanga yoga...but, Lovenly meditate on Vishnu\/Narayana. Doing dharana and dhyanam on Vishnu\/Narayana is still a basic,every day part of the sadhana of a Sri Sampradayam Vaishnava. This was the standard and practise from Ramanujacharya and before. I think and feel that it should be included on this article. The conception of Bhakti yoga on this article is very tinged with a ISKON understanding and slant. I think it would be fair to add the original Sri Sampradayam standard to this article  +++$+++ ::: I would like to put the Sri Sampradayam description of Bhakti yoga. From the time of Ramanujacharya and before, Bhakti yoga was the practise of regular Ashtanga yoga...but, Lovenly meditate on Vishnu/Narayana. Doing dharana and dhyanam on Vishnu/Narayana is still a basic,every day part of the sadhana of a Sri Sampradayam Vaishnava. This was the standard and practise from Ramanujacharya and before. I think and feel that it should be included on this article. The conception of Bhakti yoga on this article is very tinged with a ISKON understanding and slant. I think it would be fair to add the original Sri Sampradayam standard to this article [[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 07:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
16194 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16189 +++$+++ 16191 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.205765340E09 +++$+++ Dear Ism schism, I dont know if any one noticed, but, some ISKON\/Gaudiya person put some ISKON\/Gaudiya \"guru\"...some of them Notorious and very contriversial. I would like to take them out...I think it is unapropriate. The ISKON\/Gaudiya editors really tinge all of these articles with their \"group\" slant and propaganda. Please take a look at it, study it and please tell me what you think.  +++$+++ ::: Dear Ism schism, I dont know if any one noticed, but, some ISKON/Gaudiya person put some ISKON/Gaudiya "guru"...some of them Notorious and very contriversial. I would like to take them out...I think it is unapropriate. The ISKON/Gaudiya editors really tinge all of these articles with their "group" slant and propaganda. Please take a look at it, study it and please tell me what you think. [[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 07:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
16195 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16189 +++$+++ 16194 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.205974320E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I agree. I will look over these. These changes need to be made. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::::Thank you, I agree. I will look over these. These changes need to be made. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 17:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

614368 +++$+++ Griswaldo +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-09 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.281400680E09 +++$+++ Dave, can you link to the case where the expert is possibly going to be topic banned?  That is indeed interesting.  Thanks. +++$+++ Dave, can you link to the case where the expert is possibly going to be topic banned?  That is indeed interesting.  Thanks.[[User:Griswaldo|Griswaldo]] ([[User talk:Griswaldo|talk]]) 17:38, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
614369 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614368 +++$+++ 614368 +++$+++ 2010-08-09 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.281401340E09 +++$+++ Ah, it's [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Climate change|this case]]. . . .  +++$+++ :Ah, it's [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change|this case]]. . . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
614370 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614368 +++$+++ 614369 +++$+++ 2010-08-09 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.281405960E09 +++$+++ I suspect it's probably a done deal, but I worry about the implications of it. You can bet that the likes of Solomon and Watts will publicise it heavily. It will likely lead to headlines elsewhere along the lines of \"climate science banned from Wikipedia\", which will reinforce the concerns expressed by Sanger et al - that experts aren't welcome on Wikipedia. I wouldn't be surprised if the long delay in the decision was due to the Arbs trying to work out a way to avoid exactly this scenario. --  +++$+++ ::I suspect it's probably a done deal, but I worry about the implications of it. You can bet that the likes of Solomon and Watts will publicise it heavily. It will likely lead to headlines elsewhere along the lines of "climate science banned from Wikipedia", which will reinforce the concerns expressed by Sanger et al - that experts aren't welcome on Wikipedia. I wouldn't be surprised if the long delay in the decision was due to the Arbs trying to work out a way to avoid exactly this scenario. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] ([[User talk:ChrisO|talk]]) 19:06, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
614371 +++$+++ Griswaldo +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614368 +++$+++ 614370 +++$+++ 2010-08-09 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.281408540E09 +++$+++ What a mess.  Are you saying that WMC is going to get topic banned most likely?  I sure hope not.  Climate science is one of those areas that unfortunately suffers from a lot of garbage ideas floating around in mass culture because they serve political ends.  The encyclopedia could clearly use better protections against the effects of these kinds of cultural politics. +++$+++ :::What a mess.  Are you saying that WMC is going to get topic banned most likely?  I sure hope not.  Climate science is one of those areas that unfortunately suffers from a lot of garbage ideas floating around in mass culture because they serve political ends.  The encyclopedia could clearly use better protections against the effects of these kinds of cultural politics.[[User:Griswaldo|Griswaldo]] ([[User talk:Griswaldo|talk]]) 19:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
614372 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614368 +++$+++ 614371 +++$+++ 2010-08-09 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.281410100E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately a topic ban looks quite likely. Arbcom has taken a \"ban them all\" approach in the past and I suspect this will be one of those cases. I have to admit WMC has not helped his own case much, but the way he's been baited and attacked on and off-wiki would be enough to try the patience of a saint. --  +++$+++ ::::Unfortunately a topic ban looks quite likely. Arbcom has taken a "ban them all" approach in the past and I suspect this will be one of those cases. I have to admit WMC has not helped his own case much, but the way he's been baited and attacked on and off-wiki would be enough to try the patience of a saint. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] ([[User talk:ChrisO|talk]]) 20:15, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
614373 +++$+++ Griswaldo +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614368 +++$+++ 614372 +++$+++ 2010-08-09 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.281410640E09 +++$+++ Ideally editors like WMC would be better protected from that kind of baiting.  Of course if someone were to annoy one of us into committing a crime I doubt the judge would decide to absolve us entirely of our crime because of it so I guess I understand why something were forthcoming if, as you say, he hasn't helped himself (I'm assuming behaviorally).  On the other hand if a group of POV pushers can eliminate bona fide scientists from editing articles in their area of expertise by goading them on like this and making them misbehave then there is something systemically wrong with Wikipedia. +++$+++ :::::Ideally editors like WMC would be better protected from that kind of baiting.  Of course if someone were to annoy one of us into committing a crime I doubt the judge would decide to absolve us entirely of our crime because of it so I guess I understand why something were forthcoming if, as you say, he hasn't helped himself (I'm assuming behaviorally).  On the other hand if a group of POV pushers can eliminate bona fide scientists from editing articles in their area of expertise by goading them on like this and making them misbehave then there is something systemically wrong with Wikipedia.[[User:Griswaldo|Griswaldo]] ([[User talk:Griswaldo|talk]]) 20:24, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
614374 +++$+++ ChrisO +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614368 +++$+++ 614373 +++$+++ 2010-08-09 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.281411300E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=378051878&oldid=378051555 This] - completely out of the blue in a discussion WMC isn't even involved in - is a case in point. The unfortunate fact is that for a section of the blog-reading populace, WMC has become a hate figure. Drive-by trolling and personal attacks of this sort appear to have become commonplace. --  +++$+++ ::::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=378051878&oldid=378051555 This] - completely out of the blue in a discussion WMC isn't even involved in - is a case in point. The unfortunate fact is that for a section of the blog-reading populace, WMC has become a hate figure. Drive-by trolling and personal attacks of this sort appear to have become commonplace. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] ([[User talk:ChrisO|talk]]) 20:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
614375 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614368 +++$+++ 614374 +++$+++ 2010-08-09 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.281415920E09 +++$+++ Freakshownerd seems to exemplify the sort of fringe pov pushing over multiple topics that's relatively obvious and easy to deal with. As for the current case, I've no comment until the fat lady sings, if that's not too mangled a metaphor. Relapses into slumber. . . .  +++$+++ :::::::Freakshownerd seems to exemplify the sort of fringe pov pushing over multiple topics that's relatively obvious and easy to deal with. As for the current case, I've no comment until the fat lady sings, if that's not too mangled a metaphor. Relapses into slumber. . . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:52, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

16197 +++$+++ Henrydoktorski +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16197 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-17 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.205782680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your invitation, and please pardon me for my tardiness in responding, but after viewing the page you pointed to, I think this service may be beyond my abilities. Although I have some knowledge about Kirtanananda Swami and New Vrindaban due to my 16 years of service and more recently due to my research for a proposed NV history book, I do not think I can make meaningful contributions to more generalized discussions about ISKCON and Vaishnavism. However, I will periodically watch this page and add comments when I have something to say. Sincerely,  +++$+++ Thanks for your invitation, and please pardon me for my tardiness in responding, but after viewing the page you pointed to, I think this service may be beyond my abilities. Although I have some knowledge about Kirtanananda Swami and New Vrindaban due to my 16 years of service and more recently due to my research for a proposed NV history book, I do not think I can make meaningful contributions to more generalized discussions about ISKCON and Vaishnavism. However, I will periodically watch this page and add comments when I have something to say. Sincerely, [[User:Henrydoktorski|Henrydoktorski]] ([[User talk:Henrydoktorski|talk]]) 12:38, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
16198 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16197 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.206081600E09 +++$+++ Dear Wikidas, even IF...I wrote the message to Ism Schism with incorrect spelling.You had no reason to come and edit A PERSONAL MESSAGE, between the both of us.  +++$+++ :::Dear Wikidas, even IF...I wrote the message to Ism Schism with incorrect spelling.You had no reason to come and edit A PERSONAL MESSAGE, between the both of us. [[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 23:40, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

16199 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-22 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.206210960E09 +++$+++ The above message (Private claimed is actually PUBLIC) did not place any reliable sourse in the text that is about LP. Content like that should be removed. Please see:[[WP:LIBEL]] - all contributors should recognize that it is their responsibility to ensure that material posted on Wikipedia is not defamatory. That applies to both main text articles, personal pages and Talk pages. If not removed it will be reported to Administrators.<span style=\"font-family:Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ The above message (Private claimed is actually PUBLIC) did not place any reliable sourse in the text that is about LP. Content like that should be removed. Please see:[[WP:LIBEL]] - all contributors should recognize that it is their responsibility to ensure that material posted on Wikipedia is not defamatory. That applies to both main text articles, personal pages and Talk pages. If not removed it will be reported to Administrators.<span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:Wikidas|Wikidās]]</span> 11:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
16200 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16199 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.206422340E09 +++$+++ Good point. I will be spelling ISKCON correctly for now. Namaskar  +++$+++ :::Good point. I will be spelling ISKCON correctly for now. Namaskar [[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 22:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

16201 +++$+++ Shruti14 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-20 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.206081960E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I have added my comments to the discussion. --<span style=\"border: 1px solid #00a5ff; \">[[User:Shruti14|Shruti14]]<\/span> <sup><i>[[User talk:Shruti14|t]] [[Special:Contributions\/Shruti14|c]]  +++$+++ Thanks.  I have added my comments to the discussion. --<span style="border: 1px solid #00a5ff; ">[[User:Shruti14|Shruti14]]</span> <sup><i>[[User talk:Shruti14|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Shruti14|c]] [[User:Shruti14/Signatures|s]]</i></sup> 23:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
16202 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16201 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.206084180E09 +++$+++ Dear Ism Schism, Hey, who put the Alester Crowley section on the Krishna article? This section is just incoherent, philosophical bumbo-jumbo babble!!! I lived in austin texas an live in L.A...I have had almost 15 years of experience with these Thelemites! First off, Yes, they might mention Krisna...but, their practices, their philosophy are absolutely Adharmic and Avedic!! They have taken a mixture of Black tantra, Crowleys speculations on various traditions. Can we please take this out. +++$+++ :::Dear Ism Schism, Hey, who put the Alester Crowley section on the Krishna article? This section is just incoherent, philosophical bumbo-jumbo babble!!! I lived in austin texas an live in L.A...I have had almost 15 years of experience with these Thelemites! First off, Yes, they might mention Krisna...but, their practices, their philosophy are absolutely Adharmic and Avedic!! They have taken a mixture of Black tantra, Crowleys speculations on various traditions. Can we please take this out.[[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 00:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

16203 +++$+++ Shruti14 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-21 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.206156840E09 +++$+++ Both articles discuss the same subject - the day known as Ekadashi.  I propose that the articles be merged, as they discuss the same thing.  What do you think? --<span style=\"border: 1px solid #00a5ff; \">[[User:Shruti14|Shruti14]]<\/span> <sup><i>[[User talk:Shruti14|t]] [[Special:Contributions\/Shruti14|c]]  +++$+++ Both articles discuss the same subject - the day known as Ekadashi.  I propose that the articles be merged, as they discuss the same thing.  What do you think? --<span style="border: 1px solid #00a5ff; ">[[User:Shruti14|Shruti14]]</span> <sup><i>[[User talk:Shruti14|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Shruti14|c]] [[User:Shruti14/Signatures|s]]</i></sup> 20:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
16204 +++$+++ Silverballer47 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16203 +++$+++ 16203 +++$+++ 2009-06-21 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.245632580E09 +++$+++ Yes, merging them is in order. Good idea.  +++$+++ :Yes, merging them is in order. Good idea. [[User:Silverballer47|Silverballer47]] ([[User talk:Silverballer47|talk]]) 18:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
16205 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 06:16:00 +++$+++ 1.206364560E09 +++$+++ Thinking about it...I beleive you are right on all points. Thanks for taking the time to contemplate the question and responding back. Looking forward to corresponding with you in the future. One more thing, can you please let me know what you think about the Crowley section of the Krishna article. I feel that it has no place in that article. I really would like to protest it. +++$+++ :::Thinking about it...I beleive you are right on all points. Thanks for taking the time to contemplate the question and responding back. Looking forward to corresponding with you in the future. One more thing, can you please let me know what you think about the Crowley section of the Krishna article. I feel that it has no place in that article. I really would like to protest it.[[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 06:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
16206 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.206364800E09 +++$+++ As far as the Crowley section goes, I completely agree. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::::As far as the Crowley section goes, I completely agree. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 06:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
16207 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.206396780E09 +++$+++ There is some people who are insisting on leaving that section on the krishna article...I really would like to take it out. Please help. +++$+++ :::There is some people who are insisting on leaving that section on the krishna article...I really would like to take it out. Please help.[[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 15:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
16208 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.206464340E09 +++$+++ Hey Ism Schism, abacadare is really insisting on keeping the thelema section of the Krishna article. I really would like to delete it. He has come up with a second qoute to justify keep the section. What can we do? Please help. And, please look at the Krishna article discussion page too. +++$+++ :::Hey Ism Schism, abacadare is really insisting on keeping the thelema section of the Krishna article. I really would like to delete it. He has come up with a second qoute to justify keep the section. What can we do? Please help. And, please look at the Krishna article discussion page too.[[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 09:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
16209 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16203 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.206498120E09 +++$+++ I agree with the deletion of the gurus section. And, I'll help in any way possible. Can you please reply back on the abacadare\/thelema article situation. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::I agree with the deletion of the gurus section. And, I'll help in any way possible. Can you please reply back on the abacadare/thelema article situation. Thanks. [[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 19:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

540494 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-16 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.187312400E09 +++$+++ I went ahead with [[Emerson Flag Co.]] and afded it. :) Sorry for the lateness of action\/response. I had to deal with a severe case of [[Coprophagia|a coprophagic vandal]] . . . a vandal that makes your typical dung beetle look like a sponsor for Windex. :P But, I digress . . . thanks for the heads up! - +++$+++ I went ahead with [[Emerson Flag Co.]] and afded it. :) Sorry for the lateness of action/response. I had to deal with a severe case of [[Coprophagia|a coprophagic vandal]] . . . a vandal that makes your typical dung beetle look like a sponsor for Windex. :P But, I digress . . . thanks for the heads up! -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 18:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
540495 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540494 +++$+++ 540494 +++$+++ 2007-08-16 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.187313000E09 +++$+++ I've just recently started learning how to correctly tag images, but I shall do my best. :) - +++$+++ :I've just recently started learning how to correctly tag images, but I shall do my best. :) -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 18:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
540496 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540494 +++$+++ 540495 +++$+++ 2007-08-16 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.187313240E09 +++$+++ The tags good? - +++$+++ ::The tags good? -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 18:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
540497 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540494 +++$+++ 540496 +++$+++ 2007-08-16 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.187314380E09 +++$+++ Happy to help. :) - +++$+++ :::Happy to help. :) -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 18:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

540498 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-17 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.187405280E09 +++$+++ You have much more experience than me, but it still doesnt seem to make sense. Are you actually contesting the ones you bring? ''' +++$+++ You have much more experience than me, but it still doesnt seem to make sense. Are you actually contesting the ones you bring? '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 19:48, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
540499 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540498 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.187411880E09 +++$+++ OK, that does make sense--but it wasnt clear at least to me that was what you were doing & I didnt want to say anything more at cross purposes there.  My apologies. ''' +++$+++ ::OK, that does make sense--but it wasnt clear at least to me that was what you were doing & I didnt want to say anything more at cross purposes there.  My apologies. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 21:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
540500 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540498 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.187412600E09 +++$+++ I agree about bring grey area things to afd, but this has to be balanced against overloading it.   I've  wanted to do a test case once or twice, & I picked a single article. . ''' +++$+++ :::I agree about bring grey area things to afd, but this has to be balanced against overloading it.   I've  wanted to do a test case once or twice, & I picked a single article. . '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 21:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

16211 +++$+++ Juthani1 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-25 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.206513840E09 +++$+++ I remembered one thing.  Vaishnavs and Swaminarayans also have the exact same ritual. You will see differences between the rituals of Vaishnavs and Shivs folowers (not huge differences, it still is Hinduim, but minor).  Everything that Vaishnavs and Saminarayans do is the same.-- +++$+++ I remembered one thing.  Vaishnavs and Swaminarayans also have the exact same ritual. You will see differences between the rituals of Vaishnavs and Shivs folowers (not huge differences, it still is Hinduim, but minor).  Everything that Vaishnavs and Saminarayans do is the same.--[[User:Juthani1|Juthani1]] ([[User talk:Juthani1|talk]]) 23:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
16212 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.206536280E09 +++$+++ Hey Ism Schism, I voted \"deletion\" for all of the nominations. Please let me know if I can help in any way. Oh, what about the insistance of Imc and abadacare for the thelemic section on Krishna article? Can we do some thing like this with that situation? Please let me know. +++$+++ :::Hey Ism Schism, I voted "deletion" for all of the nominations. Please let me know if I can help in any way. Oh, what about the insistance of Imc and abadacare for the thelemic section on Krishna article? Can we do some thing like this with that situation? Please let me know.[[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 05:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
16213 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.206536640E09 +++$+++ That has to be a priority! I strongly feel that this topic, if placed anywhere, should be on the [[Thelma]] page. I think the best way to go about this is to find a consensus. If editors from the Vaishnavism project discuss this in full, then maybe the project can speak with one voice. What do you think? Thanks.  +++$+++ ::::That has to be a priority! I strongly feel that this topic, if placed anywhere, should be on the [[Thelma]] page. I think the best way to go about this is to find a consensus. If editors from the Vaishnavism project discuss this in full, then maybe the project can speak with one voice. What do you think? Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 06:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
16214 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.206538620E09 +++$+++ I agree! Can you correspond with shruti14, rudra and redtigerxyz to help us get this section out of the Krishna article. I have a feeling that Imc and abadacare are not true Vedics...their cryptic thelemites masking as Hindus, their too adamant in their stance on the subject. If you need me to vote on any thing or help with any thing...just let me know. +++$+++ :::I agree! Can you correspond with shruti14, rudra and redtigerxyz to help us get this section out of the Krishna article. I have a feeling that Imc and abadacare are not true Vedics...their cryptic thelemites masking as Hindus, their too adamant in their stance on the subject. If you need me to vote on any thing or help with any thing...just let me know.[[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 06:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
16215 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.206539100E09 +++$+++ Yes, I think that concensus is the best solution. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::::Yes, I think that concensus is the best solution. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 06:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
16216 +++$+++ Zeuspitar +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.206572160E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know, I have edited Twice the thelema section and abadace changed it back. Please help, what can we do? +++$+++ :::Just to let you know, I have edited Twice the thelema section and abadace changed it back. Please help, what can we do?[[User:Zeuspitar|Govinda Ramanuja dasa USA]] ([[User talk:Zeuspitar|talk]]) 15:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
16217 +++$+++ Shruti14 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.206598320E09 +++$+++ I have added my comments to [[Talk:Krishna#Non-Hindu views of Krishna]] on the Thelema debate.  My comments center around the fact that since the Thelema religion has dismissed Krishna as irrelevant (see my comments on this) why should we? [[WP:UNDUE]] is also something to look at on this. --<span style=\"border: 1px solid #00a5ff; \">[[User:Shruti14|Shruti14]]<\/span> <sup><i>[[User talk:Shruti14|t]] [[Special:Contributions\/Shruti14|c]]  +++$+++ :::::I have added my comments to [[Talk:Krishna#Non-Hindu views of Krishna]] on the Thelema debate.  My comments center around the fact that since the Thelema religion has dismissed Krishna as irrelevant (see my comments on this) why should we? [[WP:UNDUE]] is also something to look at on this. --<span style="border: 1px solid #00a5ff; ">[[User:Shruti14|Shruti14]]</span> <sup><i>[[User talk:Shruti14|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Shruti14|c]] [[User:Shruti14/Signatures|s]]</i></sup> 23:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
16218 +++$+++ Shruti14 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.206599160E09 +++$+++ See [[Talk:Krishna#Content and references for the Others section]] - [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] wants to keep the Thelema section and has proposed that instead of removing it, we add references to determine the weight it must carry in the article. --<span style=\"border: 1px solid #00a5ff; \">[[User:Shruti14|Shruti14]]<\/span> <sup><i>[[User talk:Shruti14|t]] [[Special:Contributions\/Shruti14|c]]  +++$+++ :::::: See [[Talk:Krishna#Content and references for the Others section]] - [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] wants to keep the Thelema section and has proposed that instead of removing it, we add references to determine the weight it must carry in the article. --<span style="border: 1px solid #00a5ff; ">[[User:Shruti14|Shruti14]]</span> <sup><i>[[User talk:Shruti14|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Shruti14|c]] [[User:Shruti14/Signatures|s]]</i></sup> 23:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
16219 +++$+++ Shruti14 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16211 +++$+++ 16211 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 05:53:00 +++$+++ 1.206622380E09 +++$+++ Glad to see that we are finally beginning to reach a peaceful compromise on the subject, as opposed to the potential edit wars and blocks I had feared.  --<span style=\"border: 1px solid #00a5ff; \">[[User:Shruti14|Shruti14]]<\/span> <sup><i>[[User talk:Shruti14|t]] [[Special:Contributions\/Shruti14|c]]  +++$+++ :Glad to see that we are finally beginning to reach a peaceful compromise on the subject, as opposed to the potential edit wars and blocks I had feared.  --<span style="border: 1px solid #00a5ff; ">[[User:Shruti14|Shruti14]]</span> <sup><i>[[User talk:Shruti14|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Shruti14|c]] [[User:Shruti14/Signatures|s]]</i></sup> 05:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
16220 +++$+++ Shruti14 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16211 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-01 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.207049400E09 +++$+++ Just to update, if you haven't seen the [[Krishna]] article, the Thelema section has been shortened a lot (the rest is now mentioned in a footnote) and now other beliefs have been added.  The article no longer puts so much weight on Crowley's views. --<span style=\"border: 1px solid #00a5ff; \">[[User:Shruti14|Shruti14]]<\/span> <sup><i>[[User talk:Shruti14|t]] [[Special:Contributions\/Shruti14|c]]  +++$+++ :::Just to update, if you haven't seen the [[Krishna]] article, the Thelema section has been shortened a lot (the rest is now mentioned in a footnote) and now other beliefs have been added.  The article no longer puts so much weight on Crowley's views. --<span style="border: 1px solid #00a5ff; ">[[User:Shruti14|Shruti14]]</span> <sup><i>[[User talk:Shruti14|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Shruti14|c]] [[User:Shruti14/Signatures|s]]</i></sup> 04:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

540501 +++$+++ Angusmclellan +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540501 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-17 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.187409540E09 +++$+++ Hello Carlos. According to what I see, the Fooian converts to Islam cats were merged into [[:Category:Converts to Islam]] by CFD. However, they have been split out again, so deleting the cats is not really re-implementing the original CFD result. I think they should probably have been merged back into [[:Category:Converts to Islam]]. Am I missing something?  +++$+++ Hello Carlos. According to what I see, the Fooian converts to Islam cats were merged into [[:Category:Converts to Islam]] by CFD. However, they have been split out again, so deleting the cats is not really re-implementing the original CFD result. I think they should probably have been merged back into [[:Category:Converts to Islam]]. Am I missing something? [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]]  [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 20:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
540502 +++$+++ Angusmclellan +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540501 +++$+++ 540501 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.187411040E09 +++$+++ You did all the hard work. I took the easy stuff. Cheers!  +++$+++ :You did all the hard work. I took the easy stuff. Cheers! [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]]  [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 21:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

540506 +++$+++ Apankrat +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540506 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-18 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.187487420E09 +++$+++ What's the reason for deleting the [[LogMeIn]] article ? They are the second largest player on a remote desktop access market (preceded by [[Citrix]]). Tons of Google hits and independent reviews. There's little doubt they are notable. The G4 reason for deletion is very much superficial. Thanks.  +++$+++ What's the reason for deleting the [[LogMeIn]] article ? They are the second largest player on a remote desktop access market (preceded by [[Citrix]]). Tons of Google hits and independent reviews. There's little doubt they are notable. The G4 reason for deletion is very much superficial. Thanks. [[User:Apankrat|Alex Pankratov]] 18:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
540507 +++$+++ Apankrat +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540506 +++$+++ 540506 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.187511960E09 +++$+++ As you can see from the link posted on my Talk page, previous AfD discussion was over a year ago. LogMeIn is a startup company, so its notability is subject to a rapid maturation. This is exactly why I said that G4 was a superficial reason. Please do take time to look at the numbers I provided above. http:\/\/www.google.ca\/search?q=logmein returns 1.2 million hits, over 11k hits in news groups, etc. Your deletion effectively amounts to a removal of notable material from Wikipedia without obtaining a consensus.  +++$+++ :As you can see from the link posted on my Talk page, previous AfD discussion was over a year ago. LogMeIn is a startup company, so its notability is subject to a rapid maturation. This is exactly why I said that G4 was a superficial reason. Please do take time to look at the numbers I provided above. http://www.google.ca/search?q=logmein returns 1.2 million hits, over 11k hits in news groups, etc. Your deletion effectively amounts to a removal of notable material from Wikipedia without obtaining a consensus. [[User:Apankrat|Alex Pankratov]] 01:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
540508 +++$+++ Apankrat +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540506 +++$+++ 540507 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.187568480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for a quick and reasonable response, Carlos. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Thanks for a quick and reasonable response, Carlos. Regards, [[User:Apankrat|Alex Pankratov]] 17:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

570682 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-01 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.238638740E09 +++$+++ David, please be aware that many editors have spent weeks determining what the RFC on datelinking\/autoformatting should be.  Because this was the result of such a collaborative process, it is expected that any changes to the format should be made as a result of consensus.  Please note that the option you added to the RfC does not follow the format for the other options, and it was added after hundreds of people had already registered their opinion.  Several editors have now told you that your action was premature and you have been encouraged to discuss on the talk page.  I consider your repeated reinsertions after that to be edit-warring and request that you please stop, or risk being temporarily blocked.  Talk pages are a good thing; please make use of them.  +++$+++ David, please be aware that many editors have spent weeks determining what the RFC on datelinking/autoformatting should be.  Because this was the result of such a collaborative process, it is expected that any changes to the format should be made as a result of consensus.  Please note that the option you added to the RfC does not follow the format for the other options, and it was added after hundreds of people had already registered their opinion.  Several editors have now told you that your action was premature and you have been encouraged to discuss on the talk page.  I consider your repeated reinsertions after that to be edit-warring and request that you please stop, or risk being temporarily blocked.  Talk pages are a good thing; please make use of them. [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 19:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
570683 +++$+++ Karanacs +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570682 +++$+++ 570682 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.238639100E09 +++$+++ For your convenience, I've started a discussion on the issue: [[Wikipedia_talk:Date_formatting_and_linking_poll#.22Option_0.22]].  I moved your post and !vote there so it has not been lost.  If you add the option back to the main page without consensus you will be in violation of 3RR.  (As for your vote, you may place that in comments for now if you feel that none of the other options are acceptable.)  +++$+++ :For your convenience, I've started a discussion on the issue: [[Wikipedia_talk:Date_formatting_and_linking_poll#.22Option_0.22]].  I moved your post and !vote there so it has not been lost.  If you add the option back to the main page without consensus you will be in violation of 3RR.  (As for your vote, you may place that in comments for now if you feel that none of the other options are acceptable.) [[User:Karanacs|Karanacs]] ([[User talk:Karanacs|talk]]) 19:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

16222 +++$+++ David G Brault +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.206662640E09 +++$+++ You mean an independent source, right? No, I do not no any of those. I can see his website and such, but that is not what you want, is it? By the way, what is your position on ISKCON swami articles? Do you think they should exist or do you think they should be deleted if no 3rd party sources can be found- because they never can be found. I wish they could be, but pretty much only the devotees and disciples of an ISKCON swami ever write about him.  +++$+++ You mean an independent source, right? No, I do not no any of those. I can see his website and such, but that is not what you want, is it? By the way, what is your position on ISKCON swami articles? Do you think they should exist or do you think they should be deleted if no 3rd party sources can be found- because they never can be found. I wish they could be, but pretty much only the devotees and disciples of an ISKCON swami ever write about him. [[User:David G Brault|David G Brault]] ([[User talk:David G Brault|talk]]) 17:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
16223 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16222 +++$+++ 16222 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.206671880E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your response. I feel that an ISKCON swami is notable if: they have significant media coverage, or are on ISKCON's [[Governing Body Commission]], or on the faculty of [[Bhaktivedanta College]], or have had their works reviewed by the academic community. These are the type of standards that I feel show signs of notability. Also, the readers deserve a reliable source to go to for confirmation. The types of standards I have listed above allow for dozens of articles on ISKCON swamis, I do not think that they are placing any unusual requirments upon their notability. I am open to any thoughts you have. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thank you for your response. I feel that an ISKCON swami is notable if: they have significant media coverage, or are on ISKCON's [[Governing Body Commission]], or on the faculty of [[Bhaktivedanta College]], or have had their works reviewed by the academic community. These are the type of standards that I feel show signs of notability. Also, the readers deserve a reliable source to go to for confirmation. The types of standards I have listed above allow for dozens of articles on ISKCON swamis, I do not think that they are placing any unusual requirments upon their notability. I am open to any thoughts you have. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 19:38, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

278371 +++$+++ Exvicious +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-26 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.153902780E09 +++$+++ okay.  if you feel that way, i guess you could restore the old article and add a redirect to Superman one.  be bold and all that.   +++$+++ okay.  if you feel that way, i guess you could restore the old article and add a redirect to Superman one.  be bold and all that.  [[User:Exvicious|Exvicious]] 01:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
278372 +++$+++ Exvicious +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278371 +++$+++ 278371 +++$+++ 2006-07-26 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.153904580E09 +++$+++ You should probably change the first sentence back too.   +++$+++ :You should probably change the first sentence back too.  [[User:Exvicious|Exvicious]] 02:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

483302 +++$+++ YoSoyGuapo +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.190259420E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Template:Infobox_Baseball_Career#Baseball_Career  Tell me what you think!  thanks  +++$+++ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_Baseball_Career#Baseball_Career  Tell me what you think!  thanks [[User:YoSoyGuapo|YoSoyGuapo]] 20:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
483303 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483302 +++$+++ 483302 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.190260560E09 +++$+++ I think I would then use the template for Babe Ruth, with his \"up to 1,100\" home runs.  +++$+++ :I think I would then use the template for Babe Ruth, with his "up to 1,100" home runs. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 20:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

16230 +++$+++ Abecedare +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-23 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.208996640E09 +++$+++ Please note, that all of the above is intended as helpful pointers and not a critique! Cheers and happy editing.  +++$+++ Please note, that all of the above is intended as helpful pointers and not a critique! Cheers and happy editing. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 17:24, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
16231 +++$+++ Abecedare +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16230 +++$+++ 16230 +++$+++ 2008-04-23 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.208996940E09 +++$+++ Oh, I forgot to mention: When you create a new stub, consider nominating it for the \"Did you know\" section on wikipedia's [[WP:Main_page|main page]]. That gives the subject greater visibility and encourages others to contribute. See [[WP:DYK]] for the selection criterion and nominating process.   +++$+++ : Oh, I forgot to mention: When you create a new stub, consider nominating it for the "Did you know" section on wikipedia's [[WP:Main_page|main page]]. That gives the subject greater visibility and encourages others to contribute. See [[WP:DYK]] for the selection criterion and nominating process.  [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 17:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
16232 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16230 +++$+++ 16231 +++$+++ 2008-04-23 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.208997300E09 +++$+++ Thank you for pointing out that distinction. I will use \"underconstruction\" while working on articles and then label them as \"stub\" after adding the year, publisher, etc. Thank you for the advice, and especially for pointing out the [[Wikipedia:Citation templates]] tools. I appreciate it. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for pointing out that distinction. I will use "underconstruction" while working on articles and then label them as "stub" after adding the year, publisher, etc. Thank you for the advice, and especially for pointing out the [[Wikipedia:Citation templates]] tools. I appreciate it. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 17:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
16233 +++$+++ Abecedare +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16230 +++$+++ 16232 +++$+++ 2008-04-23 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.208997960E09 +++$+++ For books with isbn you can use [http:\/\/diberri.dyndns.org\/cgi-bin\/templatefiller\/?type=isbn&id=| this website tool] to generate a filled in citation template. You will still need to enter the page numbers, url, and \"authorlink\" (if applicable) fields by hand, but it can save considerable effort. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::: For books with isbn you can use [http://diberri.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/templatefiller/?type=isbn&id=| this website tool] to generate a filled in citation template. You will still need to enter the page numbers, url, and "authorlink" (if applicable) fields by hand, but it can save considerable effort. Cheers. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 17:46, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

526993 +++$+++ Black Kite +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-28 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.204191060E09 +++$+++ Hi - you do realise you keep restoring a version of this article that says \" Bonneville Radio fired him after enduring several years of his phoniness\"?  It's an attack page.  I db-bio'd it because it doesn't show notability, but I've found a better early diff now which I'm going to restore. <b> +++$+++ Hi - you do realise you keep restoring a version of this article that says " Bonneville Radio fired him after enduring several years of his phoniness"?  It's an attack page.  I db-bio'd it because it doesn't show notability, but I've found a better early diff now which I'm going to restore. <b>[[User talk:Black Kite|<font color="black">Black Kite</font>]]</b> 01:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
526994 +++$+++ Black Kite +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 526993 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.204191540E09 +++$+++ No problem. It was all a bit of confusion, I think. I removed the reference too, because it was a dead link. I've added his KTRS homepage, but can't find a lot else. If you can, great.<b> +++$+++ :: No problem. It was all a bit of confusion, I think. I removed the reference too, because it was a dead link. I've added his KTRS homepage, but can't find a lot else. If you can, great.<b>[[User talk:Black Kite|<font color="black">Black Kite</font>]]</b> 01:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

540520 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540520 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-21 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.187757300E09 +++$+++ close call. I think a compromise is to transfer it all to his user talk page. Deleting is a bit harsh. --<font color=\"Red\"> +++$+++ close call. I think a compromise is to transfer it all to his user talk page. Deleting is a bit harsh. --<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony.bradbury|'''Anthony.bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 21:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
540521 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540520 +++$+++ 540520 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.187760240E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the delay; I had a wiki-error needing shutdown. I have userfied that users page. --<font color=\"Red\"> +++$+++ :Sorry for the delay; I had a wiki-error needing shutdown. I have userfied that users page. --<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony.bradbury|'''Anthony.bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 22:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

16234 +++$+++ Juthani1 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-23 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.209010740E09 +++$+++ I believe this article should be deleted.  It is a popular phrase but pretty useless.  If an admin saw it, he\/she probably would end up deleting it anyway.  The article is only 2-3 sentences long.  There isn't an article about \"Jai Shri Krishna\" unless I'm mistaken.  I know that the article has some importance so I need your opinion on what I should do.  Should I tag it?  +++$+++ I believe this article should be deleted.  It is a popular phrase but pretty useless.  If an admin saw it, he/she probably would end up deleting it anyway.  The article is only 2-3 sentences long.  There isn't an article about "Jai Shri Krishna" unless I'm mistaken.  I know that the article has some importance so I need your opinion on what I should do.  Should I tag it? [[User:Juthani1|<span style="color:#ffffff;background:#ccf">&nbsp;<span style="background:#99f">&nbsp;<span style="background:#66f">&nbsp;<span style="background:#11f"><b>Juthani1</b></span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</span>]] 21:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
16235 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16234 +++$+++ 16234 +++$+++ 2008-04-23 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.209013800E09 +++$+++ The only difference I see between this article and other religious terms is that this one is not fleshed out and well sourced. Other Hindu religious traditions have articles for their mantra such as [[Aum Namah Shivaya]] and the chant [[Hare Krishna]]. I will look for some sources for this one -   As far as tags... I would place and \"underconstruction\" tag on the article until it can be fleshed out and well sourced. I will be glad to help with any articles if I can. For the Swaminarayan articles, there really are only a few editors, so it will take time to flesh out some of these articles specific to this tradition. There needs to be more articles about this subject. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I hope I can help. Thanks.  +++$+++ :The only difference I see between this article and other religious terms is that this one is not fleshed out and well sourced. Other Hindu religious traditions have articles for their mantra such as [[Aum Namah Shivaya]] and the chant [[Hare Krishna]]. I will look for some sources for this one -   As far as tags... I would place and "underconstruction" tag on the article until it can be fleshed out and well sourced. I will be glad to help with any articles if I can. For the Swaminarayan articles, there really are only a few editors, so it will take time to flesh out some of these articles specific to this tradition. There needs to be more articles about this subject. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I hope I can help. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 22:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

16237 +++$+++ Juthani1 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-24 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.209024240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for replying.  Where is the list of sources anyway.  Is it on wiki?  +++$+++ Thanks for replying.  Where is the list of sources anyway.  Is it on wiki? [[User:Juthani1|<span style="color:#ffffff;background:#ccf">&nbsp;<span style="background:#99f">&nbsp;<span style="background:#66f">&nbsp;<span style="background:#11f"><b>Juthani1</b></span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</span>]] 01:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
16238 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16237 +++$+++ 16237 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.209024780E09 +++$+++ They are at [[Talk:Jay Swaminarayan]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ :They are at [[Talk:Jay Swaminarayan]]. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 01:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

278383 +++$+++ Fogeltje +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-23 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.161651060E09 +++$+++ You removed some external links in the entries for the CSI shows, linking to www.crimelab.nl. According to policy for External Links, they fit, since content not integrated into the article is provided in a NPOV. According to an older mod edit it is ok to list one or two fansites if they adhere to this criteria so I don't see why it should be removed. The link was removed in a cleanup session by someone else earlier today and I placed them back as the link follows the policy. -- +++$+++ You removed some external links in the entries for the CSI shows, linking to www.crimelab.nl. According to policy for External Links, they fit, since content not integrated into the article is provided in a NPOV. According to an older mod edit it is ok to list one or two fansites if they adhere to this criteria so I don't see why it should be removed. The link was removed in a cleanup session by someone else earlier today and I placed them back as the link follows the policy. --[[User:Fogeltje|Fogeltje]] 17:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
278384 +++$+++ Fogeltje +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278383 +++$+++ 278383 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.161661860E09 +++$+++ I apologize for troubling you with this, I reread the guidelines on external linking at it seems I overread something namely ''A page that you own or maintain, even if the guidelines above imply that it should be linked.'' While I do not own the site, I do maintain the site with the owner by keeping parts of the content (including CSI and CSI: NY (but not CSI: Miami)) up to date (even though I remain neutral as far as the content is concerned). Therefore the link should not have been added by me in the first place, but by a real neutral third party, even though I still believe it fits Wikipedia's NPOV and adds content not provided by Wikipedia. Sorry for wasting your time, I should read the guidelines more closely.-- +++$+++ :I apologize for troubling you with this, I reread the guidelines on external linking at it seems I overread something namely ''A page that you own or maintain, even if the guidelines above imply that it should be linked.'' While I do not own the site, I do maintain the site with the owner by keeping parts of the content (including CSI and CSI: NY (but not CSI: Miami)) up to date (even though I remain neutral as far as the content is concerned). Therefore the link should not have been added by me in the first place, but by a real neutral third party, even though I still believe it fits Wikipedia's NPOV and adds content not provided by Wikipedia. Sorry for wasting your time, I should read the guidelines more closely.--[[User:Fogeltje|Fogeltje]] 20:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

506825 +++$+++ Dgies +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-18 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.179492000E09 +++$+++ Just because one user is violating 3RR doesn't give you permission to violate it while reverting them.  <font face=\"monospace\"> +++$+++ Just because one user is violating 3RR doesn't give you permission to violate it while reverting them.  <font face="monospace">[[User:Dgies|<font color="#00F">'''&mdash;dgies'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Dgies|t]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Dgies|c]]</sub></font> 05:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
506826 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506825 +++$+++ 506825 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.179492180E09 +++$+++ Please accept my humble apologies. -- +++$+++ :Please accept my humble apologies. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] 05:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

540531 +++$+++ Springnuts +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-22 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.187852220E09 +++$+++ Hi,  Thanks for your kind comments.  A7 and G4 passed me by ... must be Admin-speak I guess.  Regards,   +++$+++ Hi,  Thanks for your kind comments.  A7 and G4 passed me by ... must be Admin-speak I guess.  Regards,  [[User:Springnuts|Springnuts]] 23:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
540532 +++$+++ Springnuts +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540531 +++$+++ 540531 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.187852460E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  :)   +++$+++ : Thanks!  :)  [[User:Springnuts|Springnuts]] 00:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

278390 +++$+++ Valentinejoesmith +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-03 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.162605720E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've placed a <nowiki>{{holdon}}<\/nowiki> tag on J-M A. since he is a French football executive of some note and there is information in that VERY brief stub. I placed a \"French football stub\" on J-M A. and someone who is interested in French football can expand the stub. Cheers  +++$+++ Hi, I've placed a <nowiki>{{holdon}}</nowiki> tag on J-M A. since he is a French football executive of some note and there is information in that VERY brief stub. I placed a "French football stub" on J-M A. and someone who is interested in French football can expand the stub. Cheers [[User:Valentinejoesmith|V. Joe]] 18:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
278391 +++$+++ Valentinejoesmith +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278390 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-03 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.162605960E09 +++$+++ Quick draw: Not to worry, I've been regularly included (sometimes with justification, more often not) of the same thing. Generally speaking, if the contributor is reasonable, she\/he is more likely to address my deletion request or NOT deletion request with reason. People who are less reasonable either delete tags, ignore me completely, don't know enough about wikipedia to contest it... or go ape. Cheers  +++$+++ :: Quick draw: Not to worry, I've been regularly included (sometimes with justification, more often not) of the same thing. Generally speaking, if the contributor is reasonable, she/he is more likely to address my deletion request or NOT deletion request with reason. People who are less reasonable either delete tags, ignore me completely, don't know enough about wikipedia to contest it... or go ape. Cheers [[User:Valentinejoesmith|V. Joe]] 18:06, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

278392 +++$+++ Myselfalso +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278392 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-07 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.162919880E09 +++$+++ [[User:Blaxthos]] put the article up for deletion, not through AfD, but as a blatant violation of [[WP:NOT]].  Because of my contesting this, I removed the tag, as Blaxthos' deletion tag would've deleted the page within 5 days.  -- +++$+++ [[User:Blaxthos]] put the article up for deletion, not through AfD, but as a blatant violation of [[WP:NOT]].  Because of my contesting this, I removed the tag, as Blaxthos' deletion tag would've deleted the page within 5 days.  --[[User:Myselfalso|myselfalso]] 09:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
278393 +++$+++ Blaxthos +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278392 +++$+++ 278392 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.162942620E09 +++$+++ You asked for reasoning regarding the deletion selection... Wikipedia should not try to be a collection of all information; this was recognized and codified in what [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not]].  I encourage a narrow reading of what should be included in Wikipedia, for pragmatic as well as managerial concerns.  In each case, these articles appear to be nothing more than lists of stations of TV, or television stations themselves... clearly a '''directory''', which is explicitly covered in [[WP:NOT]].  No matter how useful the articles may be, they're outside the guidelines of inclusion.  Perhaps there is a suitable transwiki home (or userspace, if all else fails)?  \/ +++$+++ :You asked for reasoning regarding the deletion selection... Wikipedia should not try to be a collection of all information; this was recognized and codified in what [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not]].  I encourage a narrow reading of what should be included in Wikipedia, for pragmatic as well as managerial concerns.  In each case, these articles appear to be nothing more than lists of stations of TV, or television stations themselves... clearly a '''directory''', which is explicitly covered in [[WP:NOT]].  No matter how useful the articles may be, they're outside the guidelines of inclusion.  Perhaps there is a suitable transwiki home (or userspace, if all else fails)?  /[[User:Blaxthos|Blaxthos]] 15:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
278394 +++$+++ Blaxthos +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278392 +++$+++ 278393 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.162943400E09 +++$+++ Obviously there is a lot of support to keep the articles.  I listed them in good faith simply because of [[WP:NOT]], and because I've seen articles become stale when their main shepphard moves on and they're left orphaned.  In the channel listings case, perhaps we should stub off the main article, then?  To answer your question, I would say \"yes\" regarding removing the other lists as well, given my druthers.  I kinda gauge my views based on Britanica (my tried and true growing up) and the wikipedia guidelines\/policies.  Often I see policies ignored or subjugated with the \"well if we follow policy this time we'll be opening a can of worms\" argument (the old slippery slope).  I'm definitely '''not''' in favor of the \"we do it there, so it's okay here\" and the \"slippery slope\" arguements, but obviously this is why we have discussions instead of giving just one user the power to delete anything.  Appreciate the discussion. ;-) \/ +++$+++ ::Obviously there is a lot of support to keep the articles.  I listed them in good faith simply because of [[WP:NOT]], and because I've seen articles become stale when their main shepphard moves on and they're left orphaned.  In the channel listings case, perhaps we should stub off the main article, then?  To answer your question, I would say "yes" regarding removing the other lists as well, given my druthers.  I kinda gauge my views based on Britanica (my tried and true growing up) and the wikipedia guidelines/policies.  Often I see policies ignored or subjugated with the "well if we follow policy this time we'll be opening a can of worms" argument (the old slippery slope).  I'm definitely '''not''' in favor of the "we do it there, so it's okay here" and the "slippery slope" arguements, but obviously this is why we have discussions instead of giving just one user the power to delete anything.  Appreciate the discussion. ;-) /[[User:Blaxthos|Blaxthos]] 15:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

16252 +++$+++ Redtigerxyz +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16252 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-05 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.209991260E09 +++$+++ I noiced you tagging articles with the Vaishnava wikiproject. If possible, please assess the article too (if you have considerably not worked on it), for wikiproject Hinduism as there is a big backlog to be assessed. See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism\/Assessment]]. Thanks. -- +++$+++ I noiced you tagging articles with the Vaishnava wikiproject. If possible, please assess the article too (if you have considerably not worked on it), for wikiproject Hinduism as there is a big backlog to be assessed. See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism/Assessment]]. Thanks. --[[User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] ([[User talk:Redtigerxyz|talk]]) 05:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
16253 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16252 +++$+++ 16252 +++$+++ 2008-05-05 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.210025460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pointing this out, I will start tagging and assessing as well for Hindu articles when I tag talk pages. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Thanks for pointing this out, I will start tagging and assessing as well for Hindu articles when I tag talk pages. Thanks again. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 15:11, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

540541 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-24 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.188024720E09 +++$+++ Would reverting the continued posting of a nintendo event information on a pokemon page, count as 3RR? I think that would fall under [[WP:UP#NOT|inappropriate content]] but I want to check lest I accidentally violate it. - +++$+++ Would reverting the continued posting of a nintendo event information on a pokemon page, count as 3RR? I think that would fall under [[WP:UP#NOT|inappropriate content]] but I want to check lest I accidentally violate it. -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 23:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
540542 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540541 +++$+++ 540541 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.188024960E09 +++$+++ Admittedly I do watch the article (I'm a part of the Pokemon Project) but I'll just leave it be then. If it persists after someone else steps in I'll go to AIV. Thanks. :) - +++$+++ :Admittedly I do watch the article (I'm a part of the Pokemon Project) but I'll just leave it be then. If it persists after someone else steps in I'll go to AIV. Thanks. :) -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 23:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

278398 +++$+++ Cgingold +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-21 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.164100680E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just took a look at [[User_talk:StavK]] after he vandalized [[Fascism]] 2x in quick succession -- literally <b>begging<\/b> to be banned from editing. I see that he's had multiple warnings, most recently from yourself. I suppose this is a form of virtual assisted-suicide. :) I think you should do the honors!  +++$+++ Hi, I just took a look at [[User_talk:StavK]] after he vandalized [[Fascism]] 2x in quick succession -- literally <b>begging</b> to be banned from editing. I see that he's had multiple warnings, most recently from yourself. I suppose this is a form of virtual assisted-suicide. :) I think you should do the honors! [[User:Cgingold|Cgingold]] 01:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
278399 +++$+++ Cgingold +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278398 +++$+++ 278398 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.164154260E09 +++$+++ Hello, again & thanks for your reply (yes, I chuckled). After reading your warning to StavK, I assumed that you were a WP admin and could ban him yourself. But I'm not sure you're really an admin... Can you clear that up for me? And more importantly -- has StavK actually been banned??  +++$+++ :Hello, again & thanks for your reply (yes, I chuckled). After reading your warning to StavK, I assumed that you were a WP admin and could ban him yourself. But I'm not sure you're really an admin... Can you clear that up for me? And more importantly -- has StavK actually been banned?? [[User:Cgingold|Cgingold]] 16:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

278400 +++$+++ PYLrulz +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-21 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.164131700E09 +++$+++ Figured I let you know :)  +++$+++ Figured I let you know :) [[User:PYLrulz|PYLrulz]] 09:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
278401 +++$+++ PYLrulz +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278400 +++$+++ 278400 +++$+++ 2006-11-22 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.164226560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply.  LOL, guess you thought there was no beltway period around Harrisburg.  +++$+++ : Thanks for the reply.  LOL, guess you thought there was no beltway period around Harrisburg. [[User:PYLrulz|PYLrulz]] 12:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

540549 +++$+++ 212.56.88.63 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-28 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.188346200E09 +++$+++ The Gestalt Prayer (and it's modified version missing the last line, as the article explained) is of cultural and historical importance. Why was it removed?  +++$+++ The Gestalt Prayer (and it's modified version missing the last line, as the article explained) is of cultural and historical importance. Why was it removed? [[User:212.56.88.63|212.56.88.63]] 17:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
540550 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540549 +++$+++ 540549 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.188358020E09 +++$+++ It was an uncontested [[WP:PROD]]. What reliable sources are there of this importance? There were none in the article.  +++$+++ *It was an uncontested [[WP:PROD]]. What reliable sources are there of this importance? There were none in the article. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 20:27, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
540551 +++$+++ 212.56.88.63 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540549 +++$+++ 540550 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.188537720E09 +++$+++ It was uncontested for only five days; the links from articles on Fritz Perls and Gestalt therapy made the Gestalt Prayer article unsuitable for speedy deletion ([[WP:CSD]] article critera 7).   +++$+++ **It was uncontested for only five days; the links from articles on Fritz Perls and Gestalt therapy made the Gestalt Prayer article unsuitable for speedy deletion ([[WP:CSD]] article critera 7).  [[User:212.56.88.63|212.56.88.63]] 22:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
540552 +++$+++ Richi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540549 +++$+++ 540551 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.188540960E09 +++$+++ Huh? Five days ''is'' the correct length of time for a [[WP:PROD]]. Policy pages are published for a reason. Also, from the sound of your reasoning, a better understanding of the deletion criteria may be in order. ...  +++$+++ ***Huh? Five days ''is'' the correct length of time for a [[WP:PROD]]. Policy pages are published for a reason. Also, from the sound of your reasoning, a better understanding of the deletion criteria may be in order. ... [[User:Richi|richi]] 23:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
540553 +++$+++ 212.56.88.63 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540549 +++$+++ 540552 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.188547080E09 +++$+++ Yes, but why do you believe the page was a candidate for speedy deletion given that other articles cite it as being of cultural and historical significance?  +++$+++ ****Yes, but why do you believe the page was a candidate for speedy deletion given that other articles cite it as being of cultural and historical significance? [[User:212.56.88.63|212.56.88.63]] 00:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
540554 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540549 +++$+++ 540553 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.188554100E09 +++$+++ It wasn't a speedy deletion, but I'll restore it and send it to [[WP:AFD]] so that you can show us the 3rd party reliable sources that show the cultural and historical significance. If deleted after AFD, it will be speedy deleted if it shows up again under [[WP:CSD#G4]] and maybe that is the best way to deal with this.  +++$+++ *****It wasn't a speedy deletion, but I'll restore it and send it to [[WP:AFD]] so that you can show us the 3rd party reliable sources that show the cultural and historical significance. If deleted after AFD, it will be speedy deleted if it shows up again under [[WP:CSD#G4]] and maybe that is the best way to deal with this. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 02:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

278407 +++$+++ B33R +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-25 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.164442260E09 +++$+++ I notice the user has repeated the edit, please don't revert it this time. Thanks. \u2014 +++$+++ I notice the user has repeated the edit, please don't revert it this time. Thanks. —[[User:B33R|<font color="#c00">'''B33R'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:B33R|<font color="#000"> Talk </font>]]•[[Special:Contributions/B33R|<font color="#000"> Contribs </font>]]</sup> 00:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
278408 +++$+++ W guice +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278407 +++$+++ 278407 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.164442860E09 +++$+++ you might not be able to conceive of the idea that a band would name themselves after a rude word, but needless to say [[Fuck (band)|they have]].  +++$+++ * you might not be able to conceive of the idea that a band would name themselves after a rude word, but needless to say [[Fuck (band)|they have]]. [[User:W guice|W guice]] 00:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
278409 +++$+++ W guice +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278407 +++$+++ 278408 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.164443040E09 +++$+++ no worries, i used to listen to them to be all shocking. ha. i also suspect i have been acerbic on the cat talk page, for which i apologise myself.  +++$+++ :* no worries, i used to listen to them to be all shocking. ha. i also suspect i have been acerbic on the cat talk page, for which i apologise myself. [[User:W guice|W guice]] 00:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

483308 +++$+++ NawlinWiki +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-21 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.190432220E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] 20:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
483309 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483308 +++$+++ 483308 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.190433480E09 +++$+++ Wow, that looks like quite the tragedy.  And from around my home town no less!  (I used to work in [[Clifton Park, New York]], a half-hour or so away).  I will have time to look more closely later today but from a quick glance, it does seem to need some action.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Wow, that looks like quite the tragedy.  And from around my home town no less!  (I used to work in [[Clifton Park, New York]], a half-hour or so away).  I will have time to look more closely later today but from a quick glance, it does seem to need some action.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 20:58, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
483310 +++$+++ NawlinWiki +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483308 +++$+++ 483308 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.190434260E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'll wait to hear from you.  I may also get another opinion or two.   +++$+++ *Thanks, I'll wait to hear from you.  I may also get another opinion or two.  [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] 21:11, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
483311 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483308 +++$+++ 483310 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.190436420E09 +++$+++ Please do.  A note at [[WP:AN]] perhaps?  I asked for advice there recently and was advised to similarly ask ArbCom.  The advice I received from arbitrator {{user|Charles Matthews}} was very good and well-received back at WP:AN.  My situation was very different though (a simple school IP block) and I'm not sure this situation fits what ArbCom ordinarily does.  They'll advise what should be done to help the WP community but don't typically advise further than that (to my knowledge).  Still, they don't get to be arbitrators by being dumb so it might be worth it to ask one of them for an informal opinion.  In a quick scan, I didn't find precedent or even discussion that perfectly matched this situation, but I'll keep looking later today.  \u2014 +++$+++ **Please do.  A note at [[WP:AN]] perhaps?  I asked for advice there recently and was advised to similarly ask ArbCom.  The advice I received from arbitrator {{user|Charles Matthews}} was very good and well-received back at WP:AN.  My situation was very different though (a simple school IP block) and I'm not sure this situation fits what ArbCom ordinarily does.  They'll advise what should be done to help the WP community but don't typically advise further than that (to my knowledge).  Still, they don't get to be arbitrators by being dumb so it might be worth it to ask one of them for an informal opinion.  In a quick scan, I didn't find precedent or even discussion that perfectly matched this situation, but I'll keep looking later today.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 21:47, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

278410 +++$+++ Dechnique23 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278410 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-26 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.164529560E09 +++$+++ It wasn't so much that I was only going to post 2001-2002. I was in the process of including all the seasons starting from 2001-2002. Would you mind if I continue that process? -- +++$+++ It wasn't so much that I was only going to post 2001-2002. I was in the process of including all the seasons starting from 2001-2002. Would you mind if I continue that process? --[[User:Dechnique23|Dechnique23]] 00:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
278411 +++$+++ Dechnique23 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278410 +++$+++ 278410 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.164529920E09 +++$+++ But if I have all the information of top shows since 2001-2002, why shouldn't I put it online? This is supposed to be an informational web site. And why be a stickler for this particular information? Do you suggest any other page for this content? Just wondering -- +++$+++ :But if I have all the information of top shows since 2001-2002, why shouldn't I put it online? This is supposed to be an informational web site. And why be a stickler for this particular information? Do you suggest any other page for this content? Just wondering --[[User:Dechnique23|Dechnique23]] 00:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
278412 +++$+++ Chifumbe +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278410 +++$+++ 278410 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.164596460E09 +++$+++ I have been making edits to [[jesse jackson]] for a long time and would like for you to specify which edits i have made you think is vandalism. If you do not agree with an edit, it does not make it vandalism. +++$+++ : I have been making edits to [[jesse jackson]] for a long time and would like for you to specify which edits i have made you think is vandalism. If you do not agree with an edit, it does not make it vandalism.[[User:Chifumbe|Muntuwandi]] 19:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

16268 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-21 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.211406180E09 +++$+++ Ism schism, I think we should discuss the strategy for the WP:KRISHNA and it needs to be developed more. Also correlation with Vaishnavism project. I see Vaishnavism taking priority on most issues, but most included in both. Let me know what you think. Thanks for contributions to biblio for the project. Its a useful stock of information <span style=\"font-family:Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ Ism schism, I think we should discuss the strategy for the WP:KRISHNA and it needs to be developed more. Also correlation with Vaishnavism project. I see Vaishnavism taking priority on most issues, but most included in both. Let me know what you think. Thanks for contributions to biblio for the project. Its a useful stock of information <span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:Wikidas|Wikidās ॐ]]</span> 14:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
16269 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16268 +++$+++ 16268 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.211407740E09 +++$+++ I think before the project can take off on a direction, it has to know what it is about. So far on the project page it states, \"This project has the common goal of improving articles related to [[Radha Krishna]].\" First, I believe, it has to be established that Krishnaism is the religious tradition devoted to [[Radha Krishna]]. I have started working on the article for [[Krishnaism]], any thoughts you have on that article would be greatly appreciated. I think once we map the extent of what Krishnaism is, then we can move further. Let me know what you think. Thanks.  +++$+++ :I think before the project can take off on a direction, it has to know what it is about. So far on the project page it states, "This project has the common goal of improving articles related to [[Radha Krishna]]." First, I believe, it has to be established that Krishnaism is the religious tradition devoted to [[Radha Krishna]]. I have started working on the article for [[Krishnaism]], any thoughts you have on that article would be greatly appreciated. I think once we map the extent of what Krishnaism is, then we can move further. Let me know what you think. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 15:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
16270 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16268 +++$+++ 16269 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.211412960E09 +++$+++ You surely do not think that there is only one definition of the term - I would take it as only one perspective on what it means not that it establishes that Krishnaism is that.  Krishnaism is the name of the project but not a definition of the scope. Article could be good, but should accommodate all points of view (including RK traditions mentioned). <span style=\"font-family:Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ ::You surely do not think that there is only one definition of the term - I would take it as only one perspective on what it means not that it establishes that Krishnaism is that.  Krishnaism is the name of the project but not a definition of the scope. Article could be good, but should accommodate all points of view (including RK traditions mentioned). <span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:Wikidas|Wikidās ॐ]]</span> 16:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
16271 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16268 +++$+++ 16270 +++$+++ 2008-05-21 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.211421300E09 +++$+++ I was thinking too simple, I agree with you there are many definitions and these should be accomidated in the article. As far as the project is concerned, I am not to sure about where to start or what direction to take for further development - but I am open to any ideas and am very willing to help. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::I was thinking too simple, I agree with you there are many definitions and these should be accomidated in the article. As far as the project is concerned, I am not to sure about where to start or what direction to take for further development - but I am open to any ideas and am very willing to help. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 18:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
16272 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16268 +++$+++ 16271 +++$+++ 2008-05-22 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.211521020E09 +++$+++ I may be too complex, I have done some research on what [[Krishnaism]] is and put in the article. Please review and let me know what you think. <span style=\"font-family:Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ ::::I may be too complex, I have done some research on what [[Krishnaism]] is and put in the article. Please review and let me know what you think. <span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:Wikidas|Wikidās]][[Special:Contributions/Wikidas|-]][[User talk:Wikidas|ॐ]]</span> 22:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

278413 +++$+++ Rschen7754 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-27 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.164632400E09 +++$+++ IMHO I don't see why the other shields need to be displayed though... --''' +++$+++ IMHO I don't see why the other shields need to be displayed though... --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rschen7754]]''' ([[User_talk:Rschen7754|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|contribs]]) 05:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
278414 +++$+++ Rschen7754 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278413 +++$+++ 278413 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.164633060E09 +++$+++ Then 21 should not be displayed in the infobox since it has its own article. --''' +++$+++ :Then 21 should not be displayed in the infobox since it has its own article. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rschen7754]]''' ([[User_talk:Rschen7754|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|contribs]]) 05:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
278415 +++$+++ SqueakBox +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278413 +++$+++ 278414 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.164973560E09 +++$+++ User:Swello is likely one of the many socks of [[User:The hobgoblin]], a pretty nasty character, eg see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User%3ASqueakBox&diff=91008378&oldid=90179776 here] who has been trolling and socking for days and especially today, see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/SqueakBox my contribs], originating from [[Mulatto]] and with an admin at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#user6|Jghfutikdpe3]] saying they cant block the underlying ip addresses,  +++$+++ ::User:Swello is likely one of the many socks of [[User:The hobgoblin]], a pretty nasty character, eg see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ASqueakBox&diff=91008378&oldid=90179776 here] who has been trolling and socking for days and especially today, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/SqueakBox my contribs], originating from [[Mulatto]] and with an admin at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#user6|Jghfutikdpe3]] saying they cant block the underlying ip addresses, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 03:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

540559 +++$+++ 82.3.198.172 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-29 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.188454080E09 +++$+++ I agree it did comply with the rules and the main consern was been changed. It already had bits added to it to stop it! It should not have been deleted +++$+++ I agree it did comply with the rules and the main consern was been changed. It already had bits added to it to stop it! It should not have been deleted[[User:82.3.198.172|82.3.198.172]] 23:08, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
540560 +++$+++ Richi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540559 +++$+++ 540559 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.188541080E09 +++$+++ Hmmm, does anyone else smell sock-puppetry? ...  +++$+++ *Hmmm, does anyone else smell sock-puppetry? ... [[User:Richi|richi]] 23:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
540561 +++$+++ Richi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540559 +++$+++ 540560 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.188542820E09 +++$+++ Darn the SSP submission process is horribly laborious. [[Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets\/Roosterrulez]] ...  +++$+++ **Darn the SSP submission process is horribly laborious. [[Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Roosterrulez]] ... [[User:Richi|richi]] 23:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
540562 +++$+++ Richi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540559 +++$+++ 540561 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.188586980E09 +++$+++ You're more than welcome ...  +++$+++ ***You're more than welcome ... [[User:Richi|richi]] 12:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
540563 +++$+++ Richi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540559 +++$+++ 540562 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.188626640E09 +++$+++ Blocked ...  +++$+++ ****Blocked ... [[User:Richi|richi]] 23:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

271142 +++$+++ the_ed17 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-26 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.253948400E09 +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, I know that you are busy with [[Nikita Krushchev]], but when you are done would you be able to copyedit {{Sclass|North Carolina|battleship|6}} for an eventual FAC? Thanks and cheers, \u2014<font face=\"Baskerville Old Face\"> +++$+++ Hey Mattisse, I know that you are busy with [[Nikita Krushchev]], but when you are done would you be able to copyedit {{Sclass|North Carolina|battleship|6}} for an eventual FAC? Thanks and cheers, —<font face="Baskerville Old Face">[[User:the_ed17|<font color="800000">Ed]]&nbsp;[[User talk:the_ed17|<font color="800000">(talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/the_ed17|<font color="800000">contribs)]]</font> 00:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
271143 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271142 +++$+++ 271142 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.253949540E09 +++$+++ I am willing to try, knowing that I have no special knowledge of battleships! It is a little confusing, on looking at the article, why two ships are included in the North Carolina class, the other being the Washingtonian which seems to be discused more (on first glance). Anyway, I will look through the article, as long as you are aware of my limitations! Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :I am willing to try, knowing that I have no special knowledge of battleships! It is a little confusing, on looking at the article, why two ships are included in the North Carolina class, the other being the Washingtonian which seems to be discused more (on first glance). Anyway, I will look through the article, as long as you are aware of my limitations! Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:19, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
271144 +++$+++ the_ed17 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271142 +++$+++ 271143 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.254022260E09 +++$+++ Thanks muchly. The reason that two ships are included is noted at [[ship class]]; should this be explained more in the lead? I thought I had explained it well enough, but evidently not :-) \u2014<font face=\"Baskerville Old Face\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks muchly. The reason that two ships are included is noted at [[ship class]]; should this be explained more in the lead? I thought I had explained it well enough, but evidently not :-) —<font face="Baskerville Old Face">[[User:the_ed17|<font color="800000">Ed]]&nbsp;[[User talk:the_ed17|<font color="800000">(talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/the_ed17|<font color="800000">contribs)]]</font> 20:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
271145 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271142 +++$+++ 271144 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.254022560E09 +++$+++ Perhaps a brief statement for those of us not familiar, especially if you are considering FAC. It would help clarify. I guessed it was something along those lines, but the confusion prevented me from getting beyond the intro, and you want the article to be assessable to the general reader.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :::Perhaps a brief statement for those of us not familiar, especially if you are considering FAC. It would help clarify. I guessed it was something along those lines, but the confusion prevented me from getting beyond the intro, and you want the article to be assessable to the general reader.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
271146 +++$+++ the_ed17 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 271142 +++$+++ 271145 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.254022620E09 +++$+++ Okay, I can do that. I've got to go for now, but I will do it as soon as I am on next. Please ping me if you have any questions, concerns, or whatever while going through it. Thanks a lot! \u2014<font face=\"Baskerville Old Face\"> +++$+++ ::::Okay, I can do that. I've got to go for now, but I will do it as soon as I am on next. Please ping me if you have any questions, concerns, or whatever while going through it. Thanks a lot! —<font face="Baskerville Old Face">[[User:the_ed17|<font color="800000">Ed]]&nbsp;[[User talk:the_ed17|<font color="800000">(talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/the_ed17|<font color="800000">contribs)]]</font> 20:37, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

16277 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16277 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-28 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.212005760E09 +++$+++ <span style=\"font-family:Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ <span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:Wikidas|Wikidās]][[Special:Contributions/Wikidas|-]][[User talk:Wikidas|ॐ]]</span> 13:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
16278 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16277 +++$+++ 16277 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.212005940E09 +++$+++ Thank you Wikidas. I have been looking for articles to tag for the Krishna project - and will use the link you provided above to go through the \"Unknown importance Vaishnavism articles\" for my next edits. Thanks again for all your hard work and leadership on this project.  +++$+++ :Thank you Wikidas. I have been looking for articles to tag for the Krishna project - and will use the link you provided above to go through the "Unknown importance Vaishnavism articles" for my next edits. Thanks again for all your hard work and leadership on this project. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 13:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
16279 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16277 +++$+++ 16278 +++$+++ 2008-05-28 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.212016560E09 +++$+++ Some of them are quite interesting and should probably be noted on [[WT:KRISHNA|talk page of the project]]. Thank you for your support and help, very much needed indeed. <span style=\"font-family:Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ ::Some of them are quite interesting and should probably be noted on [[WT:KRISHNA|talk page of the project]]. Thank you for your support and help, very much needed indeed. <span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:Wikidas|Wikidās]][[Special:Contributions/Wikidas|-]][[User talk:Wikidas|ॐ]]</span> 16:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
16280 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16277 +++$+++ 16278 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.212381360E09 +++$+++ That is brilliant. Whenever you are about let us know. <span style=\"font-family:Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ ::That is brilliant. Whenever you are about let us know. <span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:Wikidas|Wikidās]][[Special:Contributions/Wikidas|-]][[User talk:Wikidas|ॐ]]</span> 21:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

593920 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Nick carson +++$+++ 593920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-11 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.257941640E09 +++$+++ Please be careful when adding content that it's not a copy and paste from a news site like you did in the [[November 2009 southeastern Australia heat wave]] article[http:\/\/news.theage.com.au\/breaking-news-national\/sa-heatwave-is-climatechange-weather-20091110-i76f.html].  +++$+++ Please be careful when adding content that it's not a copy and paste from a news site like you did in the [[November 2009 southeastern Australia heat wave]] article[http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-national/sa-heatwave-is-climatechange-weather-20091110-i76f.html]. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 04:14, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
593921 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Nick carson +++$+++ 593920 +++$+++ 593920 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.257941940E09 +++$+++ As you can see it's quite the same.  +++$+++ :As you can see it's quite the same. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 04:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
593922 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ Nick carson +++$+++ 593920 +++$+++ 593921 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 06:15:00 +++$+++ 1.257948900E09 +++$+++ ''\"Adelaide's unprecedented November heatwave is classic climate-change weather,\" spokesman John Rice said.\"'' is a quote but ''the Climate Emergency Action Network said the November heatwave should act as a wake-up call to all politicians about the need for urgent action on climate change'' isn't.  +++$+++ ::''"Adelaide's unprecedented November heatwave is classic climate-change weather," spokesman John Rice said."'' is a quote but ''the Climate Emergency Action Network said the November heatwave should act as a wake-up call to all politicians about the need for urgent action on climate change'' isn't. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 06:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

90095 +++$+++ Gb +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90095 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-15 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.232084700E09 +++$+++ I didn't notice that, although it has happened to me once or twice before - every now and then, in a seemingly unrelated bit of text, a css link will be inserted a way away from where I'm actually typing. I think it's a bug in Lupin's popups when using Safari - if you follow [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:MarkS\/XEB\/live.css&action=raw&ctype=text\/css&dontcountme=s the link] it takes you to what I think is part of the code for a popup. <sub> +++$+++ I didn't notice that, although it has happened to me once or twice before - every now and then, in a seemingly unrelated bit of text, a css link will be inserted a way away from where I'm actually typing. I think it's a bug in Lupin's popups when using Safari - if you follow [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:MarkS/XEB/live.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css&dontcountme=s the link] it takes you to what I think is part of the code for a popup. <sub>[[User:Gb|Gb]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Gb|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Gb|c]]</sup> 21:45, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
90096 +++$+++ Gb +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90095 +++$+++ 90095 +++$+++ 2009-01-15 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.232086200E09 +++$+++ A further thread (and my response to both) is back on my talk page. <sub> +++$+++ :A further thread (and my response to both) is back on my talk page. <sub>[[User:Gb|Gb]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Gb|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Gb|c]]</sup> 22:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

264858 +++$+++ Slrubenstein +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264858 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-03 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.136359200E09 +++$+++ please consider this[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Virago_2#.5B.5BVirago.5D.5D]  +++$+++ please consider this[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Virago_2#.5B.5BVirago.5D.5D] [[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]]   |  [[User talk:Slrubenstein|Talk]] 23:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
264859 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264858 +++$+++ 264858 +++$+++ 2006-01-05 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.136524140E09 +++$+++ I can see no way that Anthroposophy by it subjective nature can give results that can be consistently seen by others since each individuals experience is necessarily private. I don\u2019t say that it is without value, just that it is not a science by any modern meaning of the word.  +++$+++ :I can see no way that Anthroposophy by it subjective nature can give results that can be consistently seen by others since each individuals experience is necessarily private. I don’t say that it is without value, just that it is not a science by any modern meaning of the word. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 21:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

278431 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-24 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.167013260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. I am not an administrator yet (though hopefully this will change soon). At the moment, I can only keep the article on my watchlist and a close eye on it. If you think that the blanking is becoming too much, I would suggest you to report it at [[WP:RPP]], asking for temporary semiprotection against anonymous IP addresses and new users. This will hopefully stop any disruption. Regards,  +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. I am not an administrator yet (though hopefully this will change soon). At the moment, I can only keep the article on my watchlist and a close eye on it. If you think that the blanking is becoming too much, I would suggest you to report it at [[WP:RPP]], asking for temporary semiprotection against anonymous IP addresses and new users. This will hopefully stop any disruption. Regards, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 18:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
278432 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278431 +++$+++ 278431 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.167013500E09 +++$+++ By the way, if you suspect it could be someone's sockpuppet and you think you have strong evidence, you could consider ask for a checkuser if the disruption is systematic. Thanks and have a nice xmas,  +++$+++ :By the way, if you suspect it could be someone's sockpuppet and you think you have strong evidence, you could consider ask for a checkuser if the disruption is systematic. Thanks and have a nice xmas, [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 18:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
278433 +++$+++ Asterion +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278431 +++$+++ 278432 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.167016320E09 +++$+++ The page protection request has been declined as I expected. I agree with the rationale provided by the admin: There are also good edits coming from IP addresses. Nonetheless, I will keep the page on watch.  +++$+++ ::The page protection request has been declined as I expected. I agree with the rationale provided by the admin: There are also good edits coming from IP addresses. Nonetheless, I will keep the page on watch. [[User:Asterion|<span style="color:#0000FF;font-weight:bold;">'''Asterion'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Asterion|<span style="color:#00EF00;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 19:12, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

483312 +++$+++ Solumeiras +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483312 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-22 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.190483400E09 +++$+++ Is that an acceptable use of [[WP:AIV]], to report accounts where the password is lost?? Thanks, --<font color=\"Green\"> +++$+++ Is that an acceptable use of [[WP:AIV]], to report accounts where the password is lost?? Thanks, --<font color="Green">[[User:Solumeiras|'''Solumeiras''']]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">[[User talk:Solumeiras|''talk'']]</font></sup> 10:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
483313 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483312 +++$+++ 483312 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.190484900E09 +++$+++ Sure, I don't see a problem with that.  It's the \"speedy block\" area.  :) \u2014 +++$+++ :Sure, I don't see a problem with that.  It's the "speedy block" area.  :) —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 11:15, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

278434 +++$+++ Angmering +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-26 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.167190980E09 +++$+++ Aren't you supposed to move a page rather than just copy and paste it, to preserve the edit history for copyright purposes? And don't you have to move the talk page too?  +++$+++ Aren't you supposed to move a page rather than just copy and paste it, to preserve the edit history for copyright purposes? And don't you have to move the talk page too? [[User:Angmering|Angmering]] 19:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
278435 +++$+++ Angmering +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278434 +++$+++ 278434 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.167244260E09 +++$+++ I suggest then that before too many more edits are made we move the content back to where it was and initiate a proper page move process.  +++$+++ :I suggest then that before too many more edits are made we move the content back to where it was and initiate a proper page move process. [[User:Angmering|Angmering]] 10:31, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

16291 +++$+++ Bharatveer +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-28 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.214666340E09 +++$+++ Regarding this article, which you nominated for deletion, i have now added a reliable source( a book ), which mentions him. hope this helps.- +++$+++ Regarding this article, which you nominated for deletion, i have now added a reliable source( a book ), which mentions him. hope this helps.-[[User:Bharatveer|Bharatveer]] ([[User talk:Bharatveer|talk]]) 08:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
16292 +++$+++ Bharatveer +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16291 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.214743860E09 +++$+++ Pleas see the afd discussion.I have included a weblink, in which he finds mention.This link also mentions the book \"Jewel in the lotus and the page in which gopala swami gets mentioned.- +++$+++ ::Pleas see the afd discussion.I have included a weblink, in which he finds mention.This link also mentions the book "Jewel in the lotus and the page in which gopala swami gets mentioned.-[[User:Bharatveer|Bharatveer]] ([[User talk:Bharatveer|talk]]) 05:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

16293 +++$+++ Chetblong +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-28 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.214722140E09 +++$+++ Just a friendly note, if you have nominated an article for deletion then there is no need to !vote '''delete''' as well, because the nomination is already taken as your view point (unless you are only doing a \"for process\" nomination, and you're '''neutral'''). In other words: the '''delete''' !vote does not count when determining consensus. Cheers,  +++$+++ Just a friendly note, if you have nominated an article for deletion then there is no need to !vote '''delete''' as well, because the nomination is already taken as your view point (unless you are only doing a "for process" nomination, and you're '''neutral'''). In other words: the '''delete''' !vote does not count when determining consensus. Cheers, [[User:Chetblong|<span style="color: green">''Chetblong''</span>]] ([[User talk:Chetblong|<span style="color: blue">''talk''</span>]]) 23:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
16294 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16293 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-28 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.214722320E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the feedback. I appreciate it and will take note, thank you. Also, I am just curious, what is '''!Vote''' This is a new term to me. What do you mean by it? Thanks.  +++$+++ :*Thank you for the feedback. I appreciate it and will take note, thank you. Also, I am just curious, what is '''!Vote''' This is a new term to me. What do you mean by it? Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 23:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
16295 +++$+++ Chetblong +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16293 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-28 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.214722620E09 +++$+++ Sure, [[WP:!VOTE|!vote]] means that it's not really a \"[[vote]]\" but a way of determining consensus via discussion. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Sure, [[WP:!VOTE|!vote]] means that it's not really a "[[vote]]" but a way of determining consensus via discussion. Cheers, [[User:Chetblong|<span style="color: green">''Chetblong''</span>]] ([[User talk:Chetblong|<span style="color: blue">''talk''</span>]]) 23:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

278438 +++$+++ Wooty +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-29 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.167390420E09 +++$+++ From [[WP:C]]. I am reverting to the blanked version, as per policy. --[[User:Wooty#Mission statement|'''''W''''']][[User:Wooty|'''''o''''']]<font color=\"red\">[[User:Wooty\/b|'''o''']]<\/font> +++$+++ From [[WP:C]]. I am reverting to the blanked version, as per policy. --[[User:Wooty#Mission statement|'''''W''''']][[User:Wooty|'''''o''''']]<font color="red">[[User:Wooty/b|'''o''']]</font>[[User:Wooty|'''''ty''''']]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Wooty|'''Woot?''']]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Wooty|'''contribs''']]</small> 03:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
278439 +++$+++ Wooty +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278438 +++$+++ 278438 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.167390840E09 +++$+++ No problem, made that mistake before too. --[[User:Wooty#Mission statement|'''''W''''']][[User:Wooty|'''''o''''']]<font color=\"red\">[[User:Wooty\/b|'''o''']]<\/font> +++$+++ :No problem, made that mistake before too. --[[User:Wooty#Mission statement|'''''W''''']][[User:Wooty|'''''o''''']]<font color="red">[[User:Wooty/b|'''o''']]</font>[[User:Wooty|'''''ty''''']]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Wooty|'''Woot?''']]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Wooty|'''contribs''']]</small> 03:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

540583 +++$+++ OfficeGirl +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-07 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.189149780E09 +++$+++ '''PLEASE REVIEW''' I am leaving you this message because you have participated in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Sport (software)]]  I have reduced the [[Sport (software)]] article to a stub with one valid assertion of notability which can be verified by a reliable source and is properly cited.  From digging through the sources that Mr. Badger provided, I have concluded that the software has just made it under the wire  to qualify as notable because it was the subject of a lecture at an international symposium of [[SmallTalk]] programmers about a week ago.  I have tagged the article for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Free_Software]] and I have posted a note about the article on their TO-DO list.  The article is not what Mr. Badger envisioned, but it might be worth keeping now.  Mr. Badger has had many Wikipedians drill into his head warnings about the problems with his conflict of interest and unfamiliarity with Wikipedia standards and practices, and from direct email correspondence with him I am sure he will comply.  Please let me know what you think of these changes.  Thanks very much.  +++$+++ '''PLEASE REVIEW''' I am leaving you this message because you have participated in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sport (software)]]  I have reduced the [[Sport (software)]] article to a stub with one valid assertion of notability which can be verified by a reliable source and is properly cited.  From digging through the sources that Mr. Badger provided, I have concluded that the software has just made it under the wire  to qualify as notable because it was the subject of a lecture at an international symposium of [[SmallTalk]] programmers about a week ago.  I have tagged the article for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Free_Software]] and I have posted a note about the article on their TO-DO list.  The article is not what Mr. Badger envisioned, but it might be worth keeping now.  Mr. Badger has had many Wikipedians drill into his head warnings about the problems with his conflict of interest and unfamiliarity with Wikipedia standards and practices, and from direct email correspondence with him I am sure he will comply.  Please let me know what you think of these changes.  Thanks very much. [[User:OfficeGirl|OfficeGirl]] 00:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
540584 +++$+++ OfficeGirl +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.189152300E09 +++$+++ Anyhow, thanks for taking a look!  +++$+++ :::Anyhow, thanks for taking a look! [[User:OfficeGirl|OfficeGirl]] 01:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
540585 +++$+++ OfficeGirl +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.189159620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::[[User:OfficeGirl|OfficeGirl]] 03:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

278444 +++$+++ Danielfolsom +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-03 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.167823020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Danielfolsom|Danielfolsom]] 03:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
278445 +++$+++ Danielfolsom +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278444 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.167823320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Danielfolsom|Danielfolsom]] 03:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

16302 +++$+++ Soman +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-29 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.214775240E09 +++$+++ Hi. I noticed your last edit at Talk:CPI(M). Although i think we both were bothered by Sindhian's behaviour in the past days, but you should still go along with [[WP:AGF|good faith]] once Sindhian actually turned around on the core issue at the CPI(M) article. We will see whether this is sincere or not, but [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ACommunist_Party_of_India_%28Marxist%29&diff=222468729&oldid=222468450 this comment] is not helpful for a good tone of debate. -- +++$+++ Hi. I noticed your last edit at Talk:CPI(M). Although i think we both were bothered by Sindhian's behaviour in the past days, but you should still go along with [[WP:AGF|good faith]] once Sindhian actually turned around on the core issue at the CPI(M) article. We will see whether this is sincere or not, but [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ACommunist_Party_of_India_%28Marxist%29&diff=222468729&oldid=222468450 this comment] is not helpful for a good tone of debate. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 14:34, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
16303 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16302 +++$+++ 16302 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.214776440E09 +++$+++ I will let you assume good faith and work with Sindhian, that is your call and none of my business. BUT PLEASE, do not expect me to believe that Sindhian, as you say, \"actually turned around.\" I will wait for evidence of this in the future, but just today he discribed many editors as a \"disruptive gang.\" While this may not be an issue for you, I find it just a unconstructive as vandalism. Things might change, but until then, happy editing and thanks.  +++$+++ :I will let you assume good faith and work with Sindhian, that is your call and none of my business. BUT PLEASE, do not expect me to believe that Sindhian, as you say, "actually turned around." I will wait for evidence of this in the future, but just today he discribed many editors as a "disruptive gang." While this may not be an issue for you, I find it just a unconstructive as vandalism. Things might change, but until then, happy editing and thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 14:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
16304 +++$+++ Otolemur crassicaudatus +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16302 +++$+++ 16303 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.214781060E09 +++$+++ I cannot understand how Ism schism violated AGF, especially while he is dealing with a user who labels opposing editors as \"organized disruptive gang\". ''' +++$+++ ::I cannot understand how Ism schism violated AGF, especially while he is dealing with a user who labels opposing editors as "organized disruptive gang". '''[[User:Otolemur crassicaudatus|<font color="002bb8">Otolemur crassicaudatus</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Otolemur crassicaudatus|talk]]) 16:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

278447 +++$+++ In Defense of the Artist +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278447 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-03 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.167897060E09 +++$+++ This term is quickly moving from nonsense to mainstream slang.  When I first started hearing it, I had trouble finding a definition for it.  It would be helpful for Wikipedia to carry a working definition of a word that has quickly entered our language and is being legitimized.  When do new terms coined on the Internet (like \"blog\") move from being nonsense to commonly used slang?  +++$+++ This term is quickly moving from nonsense to mainstream slang.  When I first started hearing it, I had trouble finding a definition for it.  It would be helpful for Wikipedia to carry a working definition of a word that has quickly entered our language and is being legitimized.  When do new terms coined on the Internet (like "blog") move from being nonsense to commonly used slang? [[User:In Defense of the Artist|In Defense of the Artist]] 23:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
278448 +++$+++ In Defense of the Artist +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278447 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.167898320E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'll hit my periodicals where Wikislang's been dropped to find more sources.  +++$+++ ::Thanks, I'll hit my periodicals where Wikislang's been dropped to find more sources. [[User:In Defense of the Artist|In Defense of the Artist]] 00:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

16306 +++$+++ Jossi +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16306 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-12 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.215901860E09 +++$+++ Could you clarify the reason for this deletion drive? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Ism_schism]  +++$+++ Could you clarify the reason for this deletion drive? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ism_schism] [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 15:31, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
16307 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16306 +++$+++ 16306 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.215908220E09 +++$+++ Thank you for asking. I always like it when editors bring their questions to another editors talk page, even third parties. My answer to your question can be found at, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Hinduism#Non_notable_Hindu_ashrams_and_gurus Non notable Hindu ashrams and gurus]. Hindu religious leaders and spiritual leaders and the categories that I look through for non notable book and\/or guru advertisements. I hope this answers your question. Thanks, and happy editing.  +++$+++ :Thank you for asking. I always like it when editors bring their questions to another editors talk page, even third parties. My answer to your question can be found at, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Hinduism#Non_notable_Hindu_ashrams_and_gurus Non notable Hindu ashrams and gurus]. Hindu religious leaders and spiritual leaders and the categories that I look through for non notable book and/or guru advertisements. I hope this answers your question. Thanks, and happy editing. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 17:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
16308 +++$+++ Goethean +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16306 +++$+++ 16306 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.215945360E09 +++$+++ I guess I'm just terribly cynical, but I honestly don't see what good talking to you would have done. No user will admit to bias. Every user, even the most transparent political trolls,  claims that they are working in good faith and for the good of the project. You happen to believe it is better for Wikipedia to delete every article that you can talk your fellow deletionists into voting for, even articles which are completely obviously notable like [[Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj]]. I have a different approach to editing Wikipedia, which involves adding information to it. What you are doing is absolutely and clearly wrong, and you are being supported by people who hang out on afds all day and vote \"delete\". Furthermore, there is a very strong bias against religion at Wikipedia, especially New Age religion. This makes it much easier for people whose hobby it is to eliminate information from Wikipedia. Some of the articles that I created were started a long time ago, before the current Draconian policy of dead-tree notability was put in place. So they are probably not notable by your standards. Much success with your personal project. &mdash;  +++$+++ :I guess I'm just terribly cynical, but I honestly don't see what good talking to you would have done. No user will admit to bias. Every user, even the most transparent political trolls,  claims that they are working in good faith and for the good of the project. You happen to believe it is better for Wikipedia to delete every article that you can talk your fellow deletionists into voting for, even articles which are completely obviously notable like [[Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj]]. I have a different approach to editing Wikipedia, which involves adding information to it. What you are doing is absolutely and clearly wrong, and you are being supported by people who hang out on afds all day and vote "delete". Furthermore, there is a very strong bias against religion at Wikipedia, especially New Age religion. This makes it much easier for people whose hobby it is to eliminate information from Wikipedia. Some of the articles that I created were started a long time ago, before the current Draconian policy of dead-tree notability was put in place. So they are probably not notable by your standards. Much success with your personal project. &mdash; [[User:Goethean|goethean]] [[User_talk:Goethean|&#2384;]] 03:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
16309 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16306 +++$+++ 16308 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.215946020E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your your message. I appreciate your concern, but do disagree with you in your statement that I, \"believe it is better for Wikipedia to delete every article that you can talk your fellow deletionists into voting for.\" This is quite an extreme statment. I am sorry if I offended you by nominating an article you created for deletion; [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Mitsu Hadeishi]]. It was not my intent to hurt you or your inspiration for the articles you edit. I hope that we can all learn from these Afd discussions on what is the role of Wikipedia in telling the stories of notable individuals. Thanks again and happy editing.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for your your message. I appreciate your concern, but do disagree with you in your statement that I, "believe it is better for Wikipedia to delete every article that you can talk your fellow deletionists into voting for." This is quite an extreme statment. I am sorry if I offended you by nominating an article you created for deletion; [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitsu Hadeishi]]. It was not my intent to hurt you or your inspiration for the articles you edit. I hope that we can all learn from these Afd discussions on what is the role of Wikipedia in telling the stories of notable individuals. Thanks again and happy editing. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 03:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
16310 +++$+++ Goethean +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16306 +++$+++ 16309 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.215946920E09 +++$+++ Now you are implying that the only problem that I have with your deletion drive is that it affected an article that I created, when in fact, the article that I specifically mentioned, [[Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj]], which you are undoubtedly aware is a much better example of an article on clearly notable subject which <s>you<\/s> was nominated for deletion anyway. Comments like yours, which deliberately misrepresent the obvious, only add to the cynicism and suspicion that pervades the project. &mdash;  +++$+++ :::Now you are implying that the only problem that I have with your deletion drive is that it affected an article that I created, when in fact, the article that I specifically mentioned, [[Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj]], which you are undoubtedly aware is a much better example of an article on clearly notable subject which <s>you</s> was nominated for deletion anyway. Comments like yours, which deliberately misrepresent the obvious, only add to the cynicism and suspicion that pervades the project. &mdash; [[User:Goethean|goethean]] [[User_talk:Goethean|&#2384;]] 04:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
16311 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16306 +++$+++ 16310 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.215947640E09 +++$+++ '''Correction''' I did not nominate Sri '''Nisargadatta''' Maharaj for deletion; I nominated [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Mitsu Hadeishi]].  If you are hurt or offended by my votes, then that is your problem - I vote as I discern the subject before me. If you want to help the articles that you are attached to, then I suggest you find reliable sources as well as claims to notability - as both are needed. If you need any help, please do not ever hesitate to ask, as I will always be around. Thanks and happy editing.  +++$+++ ::::'''Correction''' I did not nominate Sri '''Nisargadatta''' Maharaj for deletion; I nominated [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitsu Hadeishi]].  If you are hurt or offended by my votes, then that is your problem - I vote as I discern the subject before me. If you want to help the articles that you are attached to, then I suggest you find reliable sources as well as claims to notability - as both are needed. If you need any help, please do not ever hesitate to ask, as I will always be around. Thanks and happy editing. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 04:14, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
16312 +++$+++ HouseOfScandal +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16306 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.216704960E09 +++$+++ [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]], since you're getting much unjust criticism, I want to add that I see nothing wrong with and support your efforts to get certain articles deleted.  If there is a \"pattern\" you're following, I think it was laid out by the creators of these sub-standard articles rather than by your own bias. -  +++$+++ :::::*[[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]], since you're getting much unjust criticism, I want to add that I see nothing wrong with and support your efforts to get certain articles deleted.  If there is a "pattern" you're following, I think it was laid out by the creators of these sub-standard articles rather than by your own bias. - [[User:HouseOfScandal|House of Scandal]] ([[User talk:HouseOfScandal|talk]]) 22:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
16313 +++$+++ ChiragPatnaik +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16306 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.216721400E09 +++$+++ I second this. Good work. Someone needs to be sane about the process. I personally know several god men who claim to have addressed UN and have written books and have followers in prominent people. All th criteria, fellow wikipedians quote to keep such articles. Yet I don't think they deserve an article here. They are not notable. Once again. I applaud your efforts. Cheers  +++$+++ ::::::* I second this. Good work. Someone needs to be sane about the process. I personally know several god men who claim to have addressed UN and have written books and have followers in prominent people. All th criteria, fellow wikipedians quote to keep such articles. Yet I don't think they deserve an article here. They are not notable. Once again. I applaud your efforts. Cheers [[User:ChiragPatnaik|ChiragPatnaik]] ([[User talk:ChiragPatnaik|talk]]) 03:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

278451 +++$+++ ScorpO +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278451 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.168078920E09 +++$+++ Just wondering why you removed my speedy deletion tag from [[How to tell the difference between a chess geek and a computer geek]] and saw fit to place your own over it... please contact me back on my talk page.  +++$+++ Just wondering why you removed my speedy deletion tag from [[How to tell the difference between a chess geek and a computer geek]] and saw fit to place your own over it... please contact me back on my talk page. [[User:ScorpO|ScorpO]] 02:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
278452 +++$+++ ScorpO +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278451 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.168079100E09 +++$+++ Alright thanks for the fast reply!  +++$+++ :: Alright thanks for the fast reply! [[User:ScorpO|ScorpO]] 02:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

540599 +++$+++ The H-Man2 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-11 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.189572000E09 +++$+++ Why delete the page on Mad varnish? It needed time to be improved not deleted straight away just because you've never heard of him.  +++$+++ Why delete the page on Mad varnish? It needed time to be improved not deleted straight away just because you've never heard of him. [[User:The H-Man2|The H-Man2]] 21:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
540600 +++$+++ The H-Man2 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540599 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.189572780E09 +++$+++ Well, I've just searched Yahoo and nothing on him there but he is no doubt a popular figure in the area. However I accept these guidelines so I'll be more careful in future. But maybe you should give a haflhour before deleting pages.   +++$+++ ::Well, I've just searched Yahoo and nothing on him there but he is no doubt a popular figure in the area. However I accept these guidelines so I'll be more careful in future. But maybe you should give a haflhour before deleting pages.  [[User:The H-Man2|The H-Man2]] 21:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
540601 +++$+++ The H-Man2 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540599 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.189573140E09 +++$+++ OK thanks for the help.  +++$+++ :::OK thanks for the help. [[User:The H-Man2|The H-Man2]] 21:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

540604 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-12 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.189645680E09 +++$+++ Dear Carlossuarez46, another editor has averted me of your and Wimstead's category changes, and I want to talk to you about it because your changes have led to a certain mess. Scholars don't categorize runestones according to modern country borders, but according to those that Sweden and Denmark had historically. All the runestones in Denmark, Blekinge, Scania and Halland are categorized as DR, e.g. \"DR 360\" which means literally the \"360th catalogued runestone of Denmark. However, this runestone is located in south-eastern Sweden, in a region that only historically belonged to Denmark. In the same manner, there are several Denmark runestones in Schleswig-Holstein which today belong to Germany. An easy way of avoiding conficting views of what constitute \"a runestone in Denmark\" or a \"runestone in Sweden\" is to simply divide Denmark into a Jutland category, a Danish isles category and a Sk\xe5neland category, where the Jutland category is categorized both as Danish and German and the Sk\xe5neland category is both Swedish and Danish. Moreoever, a name such as \"Runestones, Denmark\" has the advantage of not pretending that a \"Denmark runestone\" needs to be '''in''' Denmark, but only makes a connection between the two. If you insist on keeping the system you created, you need to present a solution for making the runestones of Scania, Halland and Blekinge both Danish and Swedish and the runestones of Schleswig-Holstein both German and Danish. I wait a few days for you and Carlossuarez46 to propose a working solution. If you don't, I will have to  try to revert your changes. Regards,-- +++$+++ Dear Carlossuarez46, another editor has averted me of your and Wimstead's category changes, and I want to talk to you about it because your changes have led to a certain mess. Scholars don't categorize runestones according to modern country borders, but according to those that Sweden and Denmark had historically. All the runestones in Denmark, Blekinge, Scania and Halland are categorized as DR, e.g. "DR 360" which means literally the "360th catalogued runestone of Denmark. However, this runestone is located in south-eastern Sweden, in a region that only historically belonged to Denmark. In the same manner, there are several Denmark runestones in Schleswig-Holstein which today belong to Germany. An easy way of avoiding conficting views of what constitute "a runestone in Denmark" or a "runestone in Sweden" is to simply divide Denmark into a Jutland category, a Danish isles category and a Skåneland category, where the Jutland category is categorized both as Danish and German and the Skåneland category is both Swedish and Danish. Moreoever, a name such as "Runestones, Denmark" has the advantage of not pretending that a "Denmark runestone" needs to be '''in''' Denmark, but only makes a connection between the two. If you insist on keeping the system you created, you need to present a solution for making the runestones of Scania, Halland and Blekinge both Danish and Swedish and the runestones of Schleswig-Holstein both German and Danish. I wait a few days for you and Carlossuarez46 to propose a working solution. If you don't, I will have to  try to revert your changes. Regards,--[[User:Berig|Berig]] 18:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
540605 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540604 +++$+++ 540604 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.189648860E09 +++$+++ I have certainly never intended anything but an overturn of the moves and [[WP:DRV]] as to the appropriateness of the consensus decisions which only included two or three voters, IIRC.-- +++$+++ :I have certainly never intended anything but an overturn of the moves and [[WP:DRV]] as to the appropriateness of the consensus decisions which only included two or three voters, IIRC.--[[User:Berig|Berig]] 19:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

278461 +++$+++ Psi36 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.169603520E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Psi36|psi36]] 17:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
278462 +++$+++ Psi36 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278461 +++$+++ 278461 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.169605860E09 +++$+++ The article had been deleted before, that's why I included an explanation in the talk page at the same time as I wrote the article. The first time the article was deleted I hadn't even had the chance to contest it (I'm not the original author). Is there any way to get this article on here again as I'm convinced it does meet the requirements. The only problem is that the articles I could reference to are in Dutch. And the record labels (and other artist on the roster of those labels) that prove the importance of FFF within the breakcore genre are only notable within that genre. So someone who isn't into breakcore probably won't know them. I don't think that should be a reason not to include this article, since then all articles about artists in less known genres should be deleted. How can I restore this article without it being deleted again the same day?  +++$+++ :The article had been deleted before, that's why I included an explanation in the talk page at the same time as I wrote the article. The first time the article was deleted I hadn't even had the chance to contest it (I'm not the original author). Is there any way to get this article on here again as I'm convinced it does meet the requirements. The only problem is that the articles I could reference to are in Dutch. And the record labels (and other artist on the roster of those labels) that prove the importance of FFF within the breakcore genre are only notable within that genre. So someone who isn't into breakcore probably won't know them. I don't think that should be a reason not to include this article, since then all articles about artists in less known genres should be deleted. How can I restore this article without it being deleted again the same day? [[User:Psi36|psi36]] 18:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
278463 +++$+++ Psi36 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278461 +++$+++ 278461 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.169606100E09 +++$+++ BTW: sorry if my first reaction was a bit crude. I didn't check whether it was you who actually deleted the page. Apparently it was someone else.  +++$+++ :BTW: sorry if my first reaction was a bit crude. I didn't check whether it was you who actually deleted the page. Apparently it was someone else. [[User:Psi36|psi36]] 18:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

393350 +++$+++ Pascal.Tesson +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-05 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.186303920E09 +++$+++ [[List of hotels in Hong Kong]], an article you created, has been nominated for [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|deletion]].  We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that [[List of hotels in Hong Kong]] satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also \"[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]\" and the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia deletion policy]]).  Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of hotels in Hong Kong{{{order|}}}]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>).  You are free to edit the content of [[List of hotels in Hong Kong]] during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion.  Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDWarning -->  +++$+++ [[List of hotels in Hong Kong]], an article you created, has been nominated for [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|deletion]].  We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that [[List of hotels in Hong Kong]] satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia deletion policy]]).  Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hotels in Hong Kong{{{order|}}}]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).  You are free to edit the content of [[List of hotels in Hong Kong]] during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion.  Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] 01:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
393351 +++$+++ Pascal.Tesson +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393350 +++$+++ 393350 +++$+++ 2007-08-05 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.186368840E09 +++$+++ Hi Kappa. Please keep your temper in check [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/List_of_hotels_in_Hong_Kong&diff=149368708&oldid=149349554]. You've been here long enough to know that this isn't conducive to productive debate. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi Kappa. Please keep your temper in check [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_hotels_in_Hong_Kong&diff=149368708&oldid=149349554]. You've been here long enough to know that this isn't conducive to productive debate. Cheers, [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] 19:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
393352 +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ Kappa +++$+++ 393350 +++$+++ 393351 +++$+++ 2007-08-05 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.186380660E09 +++$+++ Maybe I shouldn't have expressed my anger but I don't think lies are very conducive to productive debate either.  +++$+++ ::Maybe I shouldn't have expressed my anger but I don't think lies are very conducive to productive debate either. [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 23:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

221173 +++$+++ Goldfishsoldier +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-30 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.188498000E09 +++$+++ I noticed you've put in quite a few posts in the gun politics talk pages. I'm just wondering do you have an interest in firearms or just the politics behind them and their use?  +++$+++ I noticed you've put in quite a few posts in the gun politics talk pages. I'm just wondering do you have an interest in firearms or just the politics behind them and their use? [[User:Goldfishsoldier|Goldfishsoldier]] 11:20, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
221174 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221173 +++$+++ 221173 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.191370740E09 +++$+++ A bit of both, although in firearms themselves it an offshoot of an interest in military history in general. I'd probably be target pistol shooting as a hobby if I still could (making do instead with [http:\/\/www.umarex.de\/index.php?id=products&L=en&haupt_id=1&unter_id=1&variante_id=416.00.00&cHash=a76e07ba37 what we are allowed]), although I might with rifles when I have more time and can afford it. Politically I'm pretty much in the centre-ground - I don't believe in either outright bans or free-for-alls, but that's only within the context of my own country, socially and historically. I'm not much interested in fighting anyone else's battles (whichever side they are on) for them!  +++$+++ : A bit of both, although in firearms themselves it an offshoot of an interest in military history in general. I'd probably be target pistol shooting as a hobby if I still could (making do instead with [http://www.umarex.de/index.php?id=products&L=en&haupt_id=1&unter_id=1&variante_id=416.00.00&cHash=a76e07ba37 what we are allowed]), although I might with rifles when I have more time and can afford it. Politically I'm pretty much in the centre-ground - I don't believe in either outright bans or free-for-alls, but that's only within the context of my own country, socially and historically. I'm not much interested in fighting anyone else's battles (whichever side they are on) for them! [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] 17:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

540608 +++$+++ Endlessdan +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540608 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.189710780E09 +++$+++ I was not helping edit the article Terri hollowell. I placed a speedy deletion tag on it, which I assume the creator of the article removed. -- +++$+++ I was not helping edit the article Terri hollowell. I placed a speedy deletion tag on it, which I assume the creator of the article removed. --[[User:Endlessdan|<font face="Papyrus" color="Blue">'''Endless'''</font><font face="Papyrus" color="DarkSlateGray">Dan</font>]] 12:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
540609 +++$+++ Endlessdan +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540608 +++$+++ 540608 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.189711320E09 +++$+++ I misread your post, I have added my 2 cents to the nomination pages. Sorry! -- +++$+++ :I misread your post, I have added my 2 cents to the nomination pages. Sorry! --[[User:Endlessdan|<font face="Papyrus" color="Blue">'''Endless'''</font><font face="Papyrus" color="DarkSlateGray">Dan</font>]] 12:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

16322 +++$+++ Jclemens +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16322 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-02 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.217666280E09 +++$+++ You proposed that Acharya_S's article be deleted.  I've been doing a bit of work to raise it to Wikipedia quality.  I'd like your input on what needs to be added before you believe it's sufficient for reinsertion into mainspace.  I'm aiming to show her notable under [[WP:FRINGE]].  Thanks!  +++$+++ You proposed that Acharya_S's article be deleted.  I've been doing a bit of work to raise it to Wikipedia quality.  I'd like your input on what needs to be added before you believe it's sufficient for reinsertion into mainspace.  I'm aiming to show her notable under [[WP:FRINGE]].  Thanks! [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 01:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
16323 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16322 +++$+++ 16322 +++$+++ 2008-08-08 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.218189120E09 +++$+++ '''Reply''' My problem with the article, in its present state, is the same as with the original article which I discussed in the 2nd Afd discussion. The notability of the subject is still questionable, and the fact that the article leans on her on website, truthbeknown, is not helpful. I think that more reliable sources are needed - these will help address the issues concerning questionable notability. Most important is that the claims to notability be verified with reliable sources. Thanks.  +++$+++ :'''Reply''' My problem with the article, in its present state, is the same as with the original article which I discussed in the 2nd Afd discussion. The notability of the subject is still questionable, and the fact that the article leans on her on website, truthbeknown, is not helpful. I think that more reliable sources are needed - these will help address the issues concerning questionable notability. Most important is that the claims to notability be verified with reliable sources. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 02:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
16324 +++$+++ Jclemens +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16322 +++$+++ 16323 +++$+++ 2008-08-08 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.218192420E09 +++$+++ For now, what there was of that article has been merged into [[Jesus myth hypothesis]], focusing on her writings and criticism thereof.  It's cut down on the length considerably, and keeps the most encyclopedic content regarding her.  It seems to have been one spot of the article that no one was fighting about. :-)  +++$+++ ::For now, what there was of that article has been merged into [[Jesus myth hypothesis]], focusing on her writings and criticism thereof.  It's cut down on the length considerably, and keeps the most encyclopedic content regarding her.  It seems to have been one spot of the article that no one was fighting about. :-) [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 03:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

278469 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278469 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-27 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.169958720E09 +++$+++ Why nominate this for deletion? It was obviously created by someone who didn't know how to use redirects, so would it not be best to just correct it?  +++$+++ Why nominate this for deletion? It was obviously created by someone who didn't know how to use redirects, so would it not be best to just correct it? [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] 20:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
278470 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278469 +++$+++ 278469 +++$+++ 2007-01-27 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.169958960E09 +++$+++ Oh, I suppose that makes sense. Not the way I would have done it, but I suppose it works either way.  +++$+++ :Oh, I suppose that makes sense. Not the way I would have done it, but I suppose it works either way. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] 20:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

540614 +++$+++ Jogers +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-17 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.190047320E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for your support at [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Jogers|my RfA]]. Regards,  +++$+++ Thank you very much for your support at [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jogers|my RfA]]. Regards, [[User:Jogers|Jogers]] ([[User_talk:Jogers|talk]]) 09:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
540615 +++$+++ Jogers +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540614 +++$+++ 540614 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.190134020E09 +++$+++ Basically, I agree with you. [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy|Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy]], right?  +++$+++ :Basically, I agree with you. [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy|Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy]], right? [[User:Jogers|Jogers]] ([[User_talk:Jogers|talk]]) 09:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

16329 +++$+++ EagleAg04 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16329 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-28 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.219953960E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Barsana Dham|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Barsana Dham]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''Please also be sure that all of the content you are restoring is verifiable by highly reliable sources and that it is consistent with all of the [[WP:BLP]] guidelines.''  +++$+++ [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Barsana Dham|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Barsana Dham]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''Please also be sure that all of the content you are restoring is verifiable by highly reliable sources and that it is consistent with all of the [[WP:BLP]] guidelines.'' [[User:EagleAg04|EagleAg04]] ([[User talk:EagleAg04|talk]]) 13:06, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
16330 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16329 +++$+++ 16329 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.219986060E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your concern, but please do review the edits you comment on. In my last edit I restored a deleted section that was referenced, and have only edited the article '''Two times in Two months.''' Thanks again though, I do appreciate your concern.  +++$+++ :I appreciate your concern, but please do review the edits you comment on. In my last edit I restored a deleted section that was referenced, and have only edited the article '''Two times in Two months.''' Thanks again though, I do appreciate your concern. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 22:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
16331 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16329 +++$+++ 16330 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.219989540E09 +++$+++ Also this is not a [[WP:BLP]]. Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::Also this is not a [[WP:BLP]]. Thanks again. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 22:59, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
16332 +++$+++ EagleAg04 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16329 +++$+++ 16329 +++$+++ 2008-08-29 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.220000880E09 +++$+++ The official policy clearly states that \"Editors must take particular care adding '''biographical material about a living person''' to ''any'' Wikipedia page\", and that \"This policy applies equally to biographies of living persons and to biographical material about living persons on other pages\".  Given that this is regarding a [[WP:NPF]], restraint seems warranted here. In regards to the restored material, only the first half was referenced. There was no violation of [[WP:3RR]], but I feel that following [[WP:BITE]] and [[WP:BRD]] would be more helpful. Perhaps additional reliable sourced can be found which can help to present this content in a [[WP:NPOV]] manner. +++$+++ :The official policy clearly states that "Editors must take particular care adding '''biographical material about a living person''' to ''any'' Wikipedia page", and that "This policy applies equally to biographies of living persons and to biographical material about living persons on other pages".  Given that this is regarding a [[WP:NPF]], restraint seems warranted here. In regards to the restored material, only the first half was referenced. There was no violation of [[WP:3RR]], but I feel that following [[WP:BITE]] and [[WP:BRD]] would be more helpful. Perhaps additional reliable sourced can be found which can help to present this content in a [[WP:NPOV]] manner.[[User:EagleAg04|EagleAg04]] ([[User talk:EagleAg04|talk]]) 02:08, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
16333 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16329 +++$+++ 16332 +++$+++ 2008-08-29 10:12:00 +++$+++ 1.220029920E09 +++$+++ If you are concerned with the article, I suggest you edit it yourself. I saw a statement, which cited the [[Austin American Statesman]], that was removed. I restored it. If there are other edits you prefer - PLEASE MAKE THEM, as an editor you have this ability. I do appreciate your concern. You have taken the time to comment on my talk page twice concerning two edits I have made in the past two months. We need more editors like you on Wikipedia that have lots of time to look over these important issues. Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::If you are concerned with the article, I suggest you edit it yourself. I saw a statement, which cited the [[Austin American Statesman]], that was removed. I restored it. If there are other edits you prefer - PLEASE MAKE THEM, as an editor you have this ability. I do appreciate your concern. You have taken the time to comment on my talk page twice concerning two edits I have made in the past two months. We need more editors like you on Wikipedia that have lots of time to look over these important issues. Thanks again. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 10:12, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

540619 +++$+++ SJLARIN  +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.190236440E09 +++$+++ Could you please explain why you deleted the page 'Nationalism studies'?  It was very brief - I just started it recently - but that means it needed to be expanded, not deleted. \u2013  +++$+++ Could you please explain why you deleted the page 'Nationalism studies'?  It was very brief - I just started it recently - but that means it needed to be expanded, not deleted. – [[User:SJLARIN | SJLARIN]] 14:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
540620 +++$+++ SJLARIN  +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540619 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.190257320E09 +++$+++ Who sets the threshold for what's ready to be made public and what's not? \u2013  +++$+++ ::Who sets the threshold for what's ready to be made public and what's not? – [[User:SJLARIN | SJLARIN]] 20:02, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
540621 +++$+++ SJLARIN  +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540619 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.190260620E09 +++$+++ Nationalism studies is a significant academic field that you are just not aware of.  I have been working on an expanded [[User:SJLARIN\/Nationalism_studies_%28Draft%29| draft]] of the article in my spare time.  The public article listed several universities that offer graduate degrees in this field, which should have been enough to establish the notability of the subject. \u2013  +++$+++ ::: Nationalism studies is a significant academic field that you are just not aware of.  I have been working on an expanded [[User:SJLARIN/Nationalism_studies_%28Draft%29| draft]] of the article in my spare time.  The public article listed several universities that offer graduate degrees in this field, which should have been enough to establish the notability of the subject. – [[User:SJLARIN | SJLARIN]] 20:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
540622 +++$+++ SJLARIN  +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540619 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.190261700E09 +++$+++ Links to the web sites of graduate programs at major universities that provide degrees in the field do not establish its notability?  I think that you are applying your own standard, not Wikipedia's.  The article is obviously not finished and needs to be referenced, but there's no reason to be so zealous in deleting other people's work. \u2013  +++$+++ :::: Links to the web sites of graduate programs at major universities that provide degrees in the field do not establish its notability?  I think that you are applying your own standard, not Wikipedia's.  The article is obviously not finished and needs to be referenced, but there's no reason to be so zealous in deleting other people's work. – [[User:SJLARIN | SJLARIN]] 21:15, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

540623 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540623 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.190251680E09 +++$+++ Is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Gobstopper&diff=158999158&oldid=158998196 this] vandalism? It looked like it to me and now I'm not sure . . . either that or POV-pushing? Or am I just seeing evil where none exists? - +++$+++ Is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gobstopper&diff=158999158&oldid=158998196 this] vandalism? It looked like it to me and now I'm not sure . . . either that or POV-pushing? Or am I just seeing evil where none exists? -[[user:WarthogDemon|<font color="007FFF" face="Arial">'''Warthog'''</font>]][[User_talk:WarthogDemon|<font color="2A52BE" face="Arial">'''Demon'''</font>]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
540624 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540623 +++$+++ 540623 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.190252760E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I had my doubts. Looking on it now, I think I misread the whole thing. :P Oops. Well at any rate there was an edit before it that was vandalism so I was only half wrong. Anyways, thanks. :) - +++$+++ :Yeah, I had my doubts. Looking on it now, I think I misread the whole thing. :P Oops. Well at any rate there was an edit before it that was vandalism so I was only half wrong. Anyways, thanks. :) -[[user:WarthogDemon|<font color="007FFF" face="Arial">'''Warthog'''</font>]][[User_talk:WarthogDemon|<font color="2A52BE" face="Arial">'''Demon'''</font>]] 18:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

16337 +++$+++ Nvineeth +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-23 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.222171800E09 +++$+++ Also thanks for the cn tags, this has helped me remove unnecessary stuff. Thanks. --  +++$+++ Also thanks for the cn tags, this has helped me remove unnecessary stuff. Thanks. -- [[User:Nvineeth|vineeth]] ([[User talk:Nvineeth|talk]]) 05:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
16338 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16337 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-01 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.222851660E09 +++$+++ '''Reply''' [[Wikipedia:Reliable Sources]] are needed, and not \"various sources,\" and\/or \"no sources.\" Thanks.  +++$+++ :*'''Reply''' [[Wikipedia:Reliable Sources]] are needed, and not "various sources," and/or "no sources." Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 02:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
16339 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16337 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-01 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.222851540E09 +++$+++ '''Reply''' Because, it is SPAM. Thanks.  +++$+++ :*'''Reply''' Because, it is SPAM. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 01:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
16340 +++$+++ Cyberguru +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16337 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-01 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.222855200E09 +++$+++ '''Reply''' You have not studied the Dispute Resolution (See:[[WP:DR]]) and thus I will not accept this as an appropriate answer. A Photo Collection of the given subject is not SPAM. You should study the Wikipedia Spam ([[WP:LINKSPAM]]) and External Links ([[WP:LINKS]]) definitions. The Sadhu Photo Gallery falls under \"Links to be considered\" no.1. cited: \"For albums, movies, books, and other creative works, links to professional reviews.\"  (See: [[WP:ELMAYBE]]) If you insist on deletion we should request for comments. (See:[[WP:RFC]]) I think you should be a bit more precise and cooperate. Thank you!  +++$+++ :*'''Reply''' You have not studied the Dispute Resolution (See:[[WP:DR]]) and thus I will not accept this as an appropriate answer. A Photo Collection of the given subject is not SPAM. You should study the Wikipedia Spam ([[WP:LINKSPAM]]) and External Links ([[WP:LINKS]]) definitions. The Sadhu Photo Gallery falls under "Links to be considered" no.1. cited: "For albums, movies, books, and other creative works, links to professional reviews."  (See: [[WP:ELMAYBE]]) If you insist on deletion we should request for comments. (See:[[WP:RFC]]) I think you should be a bit more precise and cooperate. Thank you! [[User:Cyberguru|Cyberguru]] ([[User talk:Cyberguru#top|talk]]) 03:00, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
16341 +++$+++ Nvineeth +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16337 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-01 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.222908660E09 +++$+++ '''Comment''' CyberGuru, Kindly see [[Wikipedia:EL#AVOID]], \u2014 ''\"Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority (this exception is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for biographies).\"'' The link is a personal website, why dont you consider uploading the images to [[wikimedia]] under a suitable license, it will be a great addition. Thanks. --  +++$+++ ::'''Comment''' CyberGuru, Kindly see [[Wikipedia:EL#AVOID]], — ''"Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority (this exception is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for biographies)."'' The link is a personal website, why dont you consider uploading the images to [[wikimedia]] under a suitable license, it will be a great addition. Thanks. -- [[User:Nvineeth|vineeth]] ([[User talk:Nvineeth|talk]]) 17:51, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
16342 +++$+++ QaBobAllah +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16337 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-01 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.222913340E09 +++$+++ Actually, it doesn't look like that would work, as it appears CyberGuru is not the photographer but instead has collected photos from sites all over the web, most likely violating others copyrights in the process.  +++$+++ :::Actually, it doesn't look like that would work, as it appears CyberGuru is not the photographer but instead has collected photos from sites all over the web, most likely violating others copyrights in the process. [[User:QaBobAllah|Bob]] ([[User talk:QaBobAllah|QaBob]]) 19:09, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

278482 +++$+++ Alex Holowczak +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.171837440E09 +++$+++ Just give me a minute to get it all then! I've only just finished writing it out for the first time, I'm looking for sources now.  +++$+++ Just give me a minute to get it all then! I've only just finished writing it out for the first time, I'm looking for sources now. [[User:Alex Holowczak|Alex Holowczak]] 14:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
278483 +++$+++ Alex Holowczak +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278482 +++$+++ 278482 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.171838160E09 +++$+++ Tell me what you want to reference, and I will - feel free to reword it to give it the \"substantial rewrite\" if you like.  +++$+++ : Tell me what you want to reference, and I will - feel free to reword it to give it the "substantial rewrite" if you like. [[User:Alex Holowczak|Alex Holowczak]] 14:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
278484 +++$+++ Alex Holowczak +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278482 +++$+++ 278482 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.171838940E09 +++$+++ I think it should remain because, it is linked to in the [[Wikia]] article. Also, it is the leading site of its kind, in the same way that Wikia has an article on here because it is the leading wiki of its kind. I don't see the problem - fair enough, it needs to be referenced, but I'll sort that out over the forthcoming hour or so - if you tell me what you think needs to be referenced.  +++$+++ : I think it should remain because, it is linked to in the [[Wikia]] article. Also, it is the leading site of its kind, in the same way that Wikia has an article on here because it is the leading wiki of its kind. I don't see the problem - fair enough, it needs to be referenced, but I'll sort that out over the forthcoming hour or so - if you tell me what you think needs to be referenced. [[User:Alex Holowczak|Alex Holowczak]] 14:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
278485 +++$+++ Alex Holowczak +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278482 +++$+++ 278482 +++$+++ 2007-02-18 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.171840560E09 +++$+++ Alright, I'll see what I can do - I have to go for half an hour now, but when I get back I'll look for sources. Please don't delete the article - give me chance to put sources in.  +++$+++ : Alright, I'll see what I can do - I have to go for half an hour now, but when I get back I'll look for sources. Please don't delete the article - give me chance to put sources in. [[User:Alex Holowczak|Alex Holowczak]] 15:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

540627 +++$+++ Edcolins +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540627 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.190341800E09 +++$+++ May I request a reconsideration of your conclusion on this debate: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of patent trolls]]. To me, there was no consensus. Lack of neutrality is a weak reason for deletion (see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to discuss an AfD]]). The article can be salvaged. -- +++$+++ May I request a reconsideration of your conclusion on this debate: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of patent trolls]]. To me, there was no consensus. Lack of neutrality is a weak reason for deletion (see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to discuss an AfD]]). The article can be salvaged. --[[User:Edcolins|Edcolins]] 19:30, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
540628 +++$+++ Edcolins +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540627 +++$+++ 540627 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.190344320E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but I do not share your view, there was no consensus. I strongly disagree with the process of closing a debate when there is no consensus. [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion|Polling is not a substitute for discussion]]. The expression \"Patent troll\" is more than a pejorative term. The list is very interesting and the specific economic strategy of the patent trolls is an interesting way of managing and enforcing patents (search \"patent trolls\" on Google Books and Google Scholar - the study of patent trolls is even becoming an academic field as such - that's why the list is encyclopedic). The fact that the media view some companies as acting as patent trolls is a very interesting evolution of patents both from an economic and legal perspective. Please restore the article. The term is notable and the citations were verifiable: see [http:\/\/patentcircle.blogspot.com\/2006\/06\/patent-terrorism-terror-of-intangibles.html ''Patent Terrorism \u2013 Terror of the Intangibles'']. There is a [[List of designated terrorist organizations]]. A [[list of designated patent trolls]] has certainly a place here. -- +++$+++ :Sorry, but I do not share your view, there was no consensus. I strongly disagree with the process of closing a debate when there is no consensus. [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion|Polling is not a substitute for discussion]]. The expression "Patent troll" is more than a pejorative term. The list is very interesting and the specific economic strategy of the patent trolls is an interesting way of managing and enforcing patents (search "patent trolls" on Google Books and Google Scholar - the study of patent trolls is even becoming an academic field as such - that's why the list is encyclopedic). The fact that the media view some companies as acting as patent trolls is a very interesting evolution of patents both from an economic and legal perspective. Please restore the article. The term is notable and the citations were verifiable: see [http://patentcircle.blogspot.com/2006/06/patent-terrorism-terror-of-intangibles.html ''Patent Terrorism – Terror of the Intangibles'']. There is a [[List of designated terrorist organizations]]. A [[list of designated patent trolls]] has certainly a place here. --[[User:Edcolins|Edcolins]] 20:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

570702 +++$+++ Tlustulimu +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-13 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.239672180E09 +++$+++ Hallo, David. I don't know if you know the template [[Template:Vertical images list]]. But I translated it some days ago into the Upper Sorbian version: [[:hsb:P\u0159ed\u0142oha:Wertikalna lis\u0107ina wobrazow]] and added there a new parameter, that isn't in the English version (yet). What do think about this adding? I also translated the Upper Sorbian version into German: [[:de:Vorlage:Vertikale Bilder]] and some other languages (dsb, eo, sk). - The added parameter defines a background colour for the box. But it was a little bit tricky, to make it work. - I just saw, that the author of the English template was active in 2008, but not any more in 2009. Greetings -- +++$+++ Hallo, David. I don't know if you know the template [[Template:Vertical images list]]. But I translated it some days ago into the Upper Sorbian version: [[:hsb:Předłoha:Wertikalna lisćina wobrazow]] and added there a new parameter, that isn't in the English version (yet). What do think about this adding? I also translated the Upper Sorbian version into German: [[:de:Vorlage:Vertikale Bilder]] and some other languages (dsb, eo, sk). - The added parameter defines a background colour for the box. But it was a little bit tricky, to make it work. - I just saw, that the author of the English template was active in 2008, but not any more in 2009. Greetings --[[User:Tlustulimu|Tlustulimu]] ([[User talk:Tlustulimu|talk]]) 18:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
570703 +++$+++ Tlustulimu +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570702 +++$+++ 570702 +++$+++ 2009-04-13 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.239674220E09 +++$+++ (+) I just created a testing page at [[User:Tlustulimu\/Template:Vertical images list]]. The the background colour formatting works very well. Greetings -- +++$+++ :(+) I just created a testing page at [[User:Tlustulimu/Template:Vertical images list]]. The the background colour formatting works very well. Greetings --[[User:Tlustulimu|Tlustulimu]] ([[User talk:Tlustulimu|talk]]) 18:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
570704 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570702 +++$+++ 570703 +++$+++ 2009-04-16 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.239896940E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 08:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

540630 +++$+++ JForget +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540630 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.190356140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your participation for my RFA bid and for your support.-- +++$+++ Thanks for your participation for my RFA bid and for your support.--[[User:JForget|JForget]] 23:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
540631 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540630 +++$+++ 540630 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.190418240E09 +++$+++ Yes, lack of notability, see [[WP:N]]. I also note that your IP has been blocked several times, if you wish to contribute constuctively to Wikipedia, create an account so that we won't attribute the past bad behavior to you.  +++$+++ *Yes, lack of notability, see [[WP:N]]. I also note that your IP has been blocked several times, if you wish to contribute constuctively to Wikipedia, create an account so that we won't attribute the past bad behavior to you. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 16:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

16343 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-28 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.222586640E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 00:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
16344 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16343 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-01 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.222851480E09 +++$+++ Wow, you too? I appreciate your attempts at editing articles on Wikipedia. Please know, I am always open to helping new editors. In the meantime, happy editing. Thanks.  +++$+++ :*Wow, you too? I appreciate your attempts at editing articles on Wikipedia. Please know, I am always open to helping new editors. In the meantime, happy editing. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 01:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

16345 +++$+++ ADvaitaFan +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16345 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-05 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.223202720E09 +++$+++ I'd also like to remind you about \"disruptive edits\" and 3RR policies of Wikipedia. If you engage in continued rvs without first checking out reference links, or even posting your arguments on the talk page first, you might get yourself reported. Be well and edit with [[NPOV]]. Take care.  +++$+++ I'd also like to remind you about "disruptive edits" and 3RR policies of Wikipedia. If you engage in continued rvs without first checking out reference links, or even posting your arguments on the talk page first, you might get yourself reported. Be well and edit with [[NPOV]]. Take care. [[User:ADvaitaFan|ADvaitaFan]] ([[User talk:ADvaitaFan|talk]]) 03:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
16346 +++$+++ VedicScience +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16345 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-05 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.223258820E09 +++$+++ Hmmm. So someone else also ran into your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing|disruptive editing]]. You should study more instead of engaging in so many stupid and useless rvs that you trip up people and frustrate them so much as they want to report you and get you banned. You really need to work on your [[Wikipedia:NPOV|NPOV]]. I noticed that you continue to dabble in with your [[Wikipedia:POV|POV]] on the [[Henotheism]] page as well after the recent [[Adityas]] debacle. Let me remind you that \u201ccivility\u201d is best understood as rational commentary. So you should go debate on the [[Talk:Henotheism]] instead of engaging in edit reversals pushing your own [[Wikipedia:POV|POV]], without paying attention to references added by others (in this case [[User:ADvaitaFan|ADvaitaFan]]) for [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]]. It should also be noted that \u201crational debate\u201d does not just mean the usage of a good tone, but also willingness to compromise and adapt to the positions of other editors: simply repeating your original position ad nauseam through rvs in the face of questionable [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]] of your edits \u2013 is not civil, but merely [[Wikipedia:TE|tendentious]]. Be well.  +++$+++ ::Hmmm. So someone else also ran into your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing|disruptive editing]]. You should study more instead of engaging in so many stupid and useless rvs that you trip up people and frustrate them so much as they want to report you and get you banned. You really need to work on your [[Wikipedia:NPOV|NPOV]]. I noticed that you continue to dabble in with your [[Wikipedia:POV|POV]] on the [[Henotheism]] page as well after the recent [[Adityas]] debacle. Let me remind you that “civility” is best understood as rational commentary. So you should go debate on the [[Talk:Henotheism]] instead of engaging in edit reversals pushing your own [[Wikipedia:POV|POV]], without paying attention to references added by others (in this case [[User:ADvaitaFan|ADvaitaFan]]) for [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]]. It should also be noted that “rational debate” does not just mean the usage of a good tone, but also willingness to compromise and adapt to the positions of other editors: simply repeating your original position ad nauseam through rvs in the face of questionable [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]] of your edits – is not civil, but merely [[Wikipedia:TE|tendentious]]. Be well. [[User:VedicScience|VedicScience]] ([[User talk:VedicScience|talk]]) 19:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

16349 +++$+++ Juthani1 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16349 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-07 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.223441280E09 +++$+++ Excellent work on the tedious work of putting up all the banners.  Did you put the banners on all the pages, just need to double check [[User:Juthani1|<span style=\"color:#ffffff;background:#ccf\">&nbsp;<span style=\"background:#99f\">&nbsp;<span style=\"background:#66f\">&nbsp;<span style=\"background:#11f\"><b>Juthani1<\/b><\/span>&nbsp;<\/span>&nbsp;<\/span>&nbsp;<\/span>]]<sup>[[User talk: Juthani1|t]][[Special:Contributions\/Juthani1|c]] +++$+++ Excellent work on the tedious work of putting up all the banners.  Did you put the banners on all the pages, just need to double check [[User:Juthani1|<span style="color:#ffffff;background:#ccf">&nbsp;<span style="background:#99f">&nbsp;<span style="background:#66f">&nbsp;<span style="background:#11f"><b>Juthani1</b></span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</span>]]<sup>[[User talk: Juthani1|t]][[Special:Contributions/Juthani1|c]][[User:Juthani1/Guest Book|s]] </sup> 21:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
16350 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16349 +++$+++ 16349 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.223441700E09 +++$+++ Thanks. There are still quite a few more articles to tag for the project. I will be tagging these in the short term. Please do review them per their assessments, I am not that qualified to assess all of these articles. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Thanks. There are still quite a few more articles to tag for the project. I will be tagging these in the short term. Please do review them per their assessments, I am not that qualified to assess all of these articles. Thanks again. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 21:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

278494 +++$+++ Noogster +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.172479620E09 +++$+++ I very much disagree that the article that was deleted was advertising; I have never bought anything from his store as a matter of fact, but I do know that his is one of the most used online Judaica shops out there. What can I do to make the article acceptable?  +++$+++ I very much disagree that the article that was deleted was advertising; I have never bought anything from his store as a matter of fact, but I do know that his is one of the most used online Judaica shops out there. What can I do to make the article acceptable? [[User:Noogster|Noogster]] 00:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
278495 +++$+++ Noogster +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278494 +++$+++ 278494 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.172480760E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'm pretty sure there are good reliable outside sources about Mr. Balser, I just haven't even looked for them (been busy lately). Tell me, since the article was deleted, will I have to remake it from scratch?  +++$+++ :Thanks. I'm pretty sure there are good reliable outside sources about Mr. Balser, I just haven't even looked for them (been busy lately). Tell me, since the article was deleted, will I have to remake it from scratch? [[User:Noogster|Noogster]] 01:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

16352 +++$+++ Iceflow +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16352 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-27 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.225166520E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}<\/code> to '''the top of [[:Joewurzelbacher2010|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or \"db\" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:Joewurzelbacher2010|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nonsense-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom -->  +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Joewurzelbacher2010|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:Joewurzelbacher2010|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nonsense-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Iceflow|Thor Malmjursson]] ([[User talk:Iceflow|talk]]) 21:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
16353 +++$+++ Iceflow +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16352 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.225167120E09 +++$+++ In reference to your hangon tag, on this article, please see my post on the article's talk page. You will find there my reasoning for the tagging. :)  +++$+++ ::In reference to your hangon tag, on this article, please see my post on the article's talk page. You will find there my reasoning for the tagging. :) [[User:Iceflow|Thor Malmjursson]] ([[User talk:Iceflow|talk]]) 21:12, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

483323 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483323 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-22 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.190521560E09 +++$+++ Responding here to the latest Liebman comments.  (Sorry, I get anal about my archives so they're gone now!  {{(:}})  The Tinkers-Evers-Chance one is definitely a sock and is blocked now.  The {{user|Caragliano}} account is now blocked as well.  I thought you were talking about {{user|Mike caragliano}} but now I see there are two accounts.  I checked and the Jenkins birth date was originally changed a ''long'' time ago with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ferguson_Jenkins&diff=prev&oldid=28270865 this edit] but the IP otherwise doesn't fit the liebman pattern and is apparently from Canada.  It was into adding the fergiejenkinsfoundation.org spam in various places which I think was a different problem person.  \u2014 +++$+++ Responding here to the latest Liebman comments.  (Sorry, I get anal about my archives so they're gone now!  {{(:}})  The Tinkers-Evers-Chance one is definitely a sock and is blocked now.  The {{user|Caragliano}} account is now blocked as well.  I thought you were talking about {{user|Mike caragliano}} but now I see there are two accounts.  I checked and the Jenkins birth date was originally changed a ''long'' time ago with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ferguson_Jenkins&diff=prev&oldid=28270865 this edit] but the IP otherwise doesn't fit the liebman pattern and is apparently from Canada.  It was into adding the fergiejenkinsfoundation.org spam in various places which I think was a different problem person.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 21:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
483324 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483323 +++$+++ 483323 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.190522340E09 +++$+++ Yes. Two Caraglianos for the price of one. And regarding [[Ferguson Jenkins]], if he had simply made the correction but kept his trap shut, he might have got away with the 1942 thing. But by calling it our attention, he also got me to fix the HOF link. The HOF page says 1943, and I'm assuming they would have it right. Unlike Josh Gibson's home run total, player birthdates and the spelling of names [http:\/\/www.baseballhalloffame.org\/hofers\/detail.jsp?playerId=120867] are not \"cast in stone\".  +++$+++ :Yes. Two Caraglianos for the price of one. And regarding [[Ferguson Jenkins]], if he had simply made the correction but kept his trap shut, he might have got away with the 1942 thing. But by calling it our attention, he also got me to fix the HOF link. The HOF page says 1943, and I'm assuming they would have it right. Unlike Josh Gibson's home run total, player birthdates and the spelling of names [http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/hofers/detail.jsp?playerId=120867] are not "cast in stone". [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 21:39, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
483325 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.190524800E09 +++$+++ I added a footnote to Fergie acknowledging that some sources claim 1942. If Liebman had been willing to do likewise, he wouldn't be a banned user now.  +++$+++ :::I added a footnote to Fergie acknowledging that some sources claim 1942. If Liebman had been willing to do likewise, he wouldn't be a banned user now. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 22:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
483326 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.190525220E09 +++$+++ Thank you for improving the reference. I'm not so good with that technical stuff. FYI, the SABR page also lists 1942, but since Liebman probably entered that himself, I consider it a non-citable source.  +++$+++ ::::Thank you for improving the reference. I'm not so good with that technical stuff. FYI, the SABR page also lists 1942, but since Liebman probably entered that himself, I consider it a non-citable source. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 22:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
483327 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.190525340E09 +++$+++ Not a problem.  Let me know if that needs to be done anywhere else.  As for SABR, do you know if Liebman actually has enough influence to change their dates all by himself?  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::Not a problem.  Let me know if that needs to be done anywhere else.  As for SABR, do you know if Liebman actually has enough influence to change their dates all by himself?  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 22:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
483328 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.190526180E09 +++$+++ I can't actually say for sure. Their bio pages don't allow wiki-like updates, they're more like IMDB where you submit a change and someone has to approve it. But I don't know anything about their approval process. Liebman says the SABR bio team agreed 1942 was the date, but again that's just heresay. There's no source given on the SABR page for the non-standard birthdate (nor on baseball-reference, for that matter) and I would just like to see a source. This is similar to some of the other birthdate stuff that Liebman was obsessed with. He kept saying that Whitey Ford admitted to a different birthdate, but he wouldn't specify a source, which is why it kept getting reverted. Very frustrating. If a guy says \"I was really born in such-and-such\", then it should be a simple matter to cite the book and page number where he says that, and that would settle it. But that was beyond what Liebman was willing to do, and that was the start of the road to his getting banned.  +++$+++ ::::::I can't actually say for sure. Their bio pages don't allow wiki-like updates, they're more like IMDB where you submit a change and someone has to approve it. But I don't know anything about their approval process. Liebman says the SABR bio team agreed 1942 was the date, but again that's just heresay. There's no source given on the SABR page for the non-standard birthdate (nor on baseball-reference, for that matter) and I would just like to see a source. This is similar to some of the other birthdate stuff that Liebman was obsessed with. He kept saying that Whitey Ford admitted to a different birthdate, but he wouldn't specify a source, which is why it kept getting reverted. Very frustrating. If a guy says "I was really born in such-and-such", then it should be a simple matter to cite the book and page number where he says that, and that would settle it. But that was beyond what Liebman was willing to do, and that was the start of the road to his getting banned. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 22:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
483329 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.190526840E09 +++$+++ This is why [[WP:OR]] is in place.  There are a lot of people - esp. in less privileged areas - that don't actually know when they were born!  Even if they say they do, they may be proven wrong later on.  But Liebman and others (someone who commented on my talk page a few weeks back) disagree and say that certain records or statements are definitive.  Nothing is definitve in some cases.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::::This is why [[WP:OR]] is in place.  There are a lot of people - esp. in less privileged areas - that don't actually know when they were born!  Even if they say they do, they may be proven wrong later on.  But Liebman and others (someone who commented on my talk page a few weeks back) disagree and say that certain records or statements are definitive.  Nothing is definitve in some cases.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 22:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
483330 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483323 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.190527200E09 +++$+++ Precisely. Seems to me that you had this exact argument with Liebman several months ago, and he refused to acknowledge the fact that there can be discrepancies across the \"official\" records, in which case the best solution is to give all the facts (as I did with [[Chief Bender]]). The most famous player of all time, [[Babe Ruth]], went through his entire playing career thinking he was a year older than he was.  +++$+++ ::::::::Precisely. Seems to me that you had this exact argument with Liebman several months ago, and he refused to acknowledge the fact that there can be discrepancies across the "official" records, in which case the best solution is to give all the facts (as I did with [[Chief Bender]]). The most famous player of all time, [[Babe Ruth]], went through his entire playing career thinking he was a year older than he was. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 23:00, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
483331 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483323 +++$+++ 483324 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.190522640E09 +++$+++ (responding to Wknight94) That's okee-dokee. But your talk page was getting so long, I couldn't stop myself! *lol* Sorry I wasn't more clear about Caragliano\/caragliano. I do think it's bizarrely funny he created a sock to edit another sock, even though he said the first sock said he was never going to edit Wikipedia again. I don't know why he reminds me of [[Monk (TV series)|a certain TV character]]... :) - +++$+++ ::(responding to Wknight94) That's okee-dokee. But your talk page was getting so long, I couldn't stop myself! *lol* Sorry I wasn't more clear about Caragliano/caragliano. I do think it's bizarrely funny he created a sock to edit another sock, even though he said the first sock said he was never going to edit Wikipedia again. I don't know why he reminds me of [[Monk (TV series)|a certain TV character]]... :) -[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 21:44, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
483332 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483323 +++$+++ 483331 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.190522940E09 +++$+++ Well there may be more big hard-blocks coming soon.  I've heard no backlash from the hard-blocks already in place so extending them may quiet things down a bit.  I may go to [[WP:RFCU]] to ask them to look for any IPs or IP ranges I may have missed. \u2014 +++$+++ :::Well there may be more big hard-blocks coming soon.  I've heard no backlash from the hard-blocks already in place so extending them may quiet things down a bit.  I may go to [[WP:RFCU]] to ask them to look for any IPs or IP ranges I may have missed. —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 21:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
483333 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483323 +++$+++ 483332 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.190524860E09 +++$+++ Kudos.  +++$+++ ::::Kudos. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 22:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

16357 +++$+++ Mattnad +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-23 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.227476460E09 +++$+++ Care to comment on the latest thread re: her political donations?  Thanks.   +++$+++ Care to comment on the latest thread re: her political donations?  Thanks.  [[User:Mattnad|Mattnad]] ([[User talk:Mattnad|talk]]) 13:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
16358 +++$+++ Mattnad +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16357 +++$+++ 16357 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.228194720E09 +++$+++ I can guess you're reluctant to get involved, but the article now has a nice long list of negative editorial comments courtesy of an editor with a chip on his shoulder.  There's also a query on the WP:BLP notice board.   +++$+++ :I can guess you're reluctant to get involved, but the article now has a nice long list of negative editorial comments courtesy of an editor with a chip on his shoulder.  There's also a query on the WP:BLP notice board.  [[User:Mattnad|Mattnad]] ([[User talk:Mattnad|talk]]) 21:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

278502 +++$+++ Duribald +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-18 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.174211100E09 +++$+++ I cannot see that this redirect would fall under the criteria for [[Wikipedia:Redirect#Undesirable_redirects|undesirable redirects]]. Adding a redirect is just a practical matter in this case, since the talk page already exists, and should exist. It's just a way of getting back to the main article easily. - +++$+++ I cannot see that this redirect would fall under the criteria for [[Wikipedia:Redirect#Undesirable_redirects|undesirable redirects]]. Adding a redirect is just a practical matter in this case, since the talk page already exists, and should exist. It's just a way of getting back to the main article easily. -[[User:Duribald|Duribald]] 02:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
278503 +++$+++ Duribald +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278502 +++$+++ 278502 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.174211640E09 +++$+++ The \"article\" link leads to the main article, because there is a redirect to it. A comment page for a WPBiography rating does have a link back to the main articles talk page, but not to the main article itself. That's why I created the redirect. - +++$+++ :The "article" link leads to the main article, because there is a redirect to it. A comment page for a WPBiography rating does have a link back to the main articles talk page, but not to the main article itself. That's why I created the redirect. -[[User:Duribald|Duribald]] 02:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

278504 +++$+++ Rklawton +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278504 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-18 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.174211340E09 +++$+++ In all likelihood I'll delete this article shortly.  However, I'm working to avoid [[WP:BITE]], and I'm hoping that with care, we might encourage this user to continue contributing.  Thank you for your patience.   +++$+++ In all likelihood I'll delete this article shortly.  However, I'm working to avoid [[WP:BITE]], and I'm hoping that with care, we might encourage this user to continue contributing.  Thank you for your patience.  [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] 02:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
278505 +++$+++ Rklawton +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278504 +++$+++ 278504 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.174211700E09 +++$+++ Actually, I think you're right on target.  It's just that I have a little extra time at the moment, and this editor has made two non-related but useful edits previously, so I thought a bit of hand-holding might help - and I wanted to let you in on it so you'd understand.  I think you're doing good work.   +++$+++ :Actually, I think you're right on target.  It's just that I have a little extra time at the moment, and this editor has made two non-related but useful edits previously, so I thought a bit of hand-holding might help - and I wanted to let you in on it so you'd understand.  I think you're doing good work.  [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] 02:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

278506 +++$+++ 24.205.92.132 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278506 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-18 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.174211880E09 +++$+++ Seriously - please look up vocabulary before you delete it.  Especially if it is on the talk page and I haven't finished editing it yet.  Medical terms are tricky and the majority of the public don't know them.  I salute your efforts to stop vandalism but I'm trying to add to the medical knowledge not take away from it.  Give me time to properly finish my edits - I'm a bit busier than the WP trollers and need a few days to get edits finished.  In the ideal situation, someone would help me write what I had started, not revert it.  Do you own a medical book? How do you patrol medical articles without knowledge in that field.  Did I type something that was incorrect? I'm still learning this format so bear with me on that part.  However, the information will never be nonrelevant.  +++$+++ Seriously - please look up vocabulary before you delete it.  Especially if it is on the talk page and I haven't finished editing it yet.  Medical terms are tricky and the majority of the public don't know them.  I salute your efforts to stop vandalism but I'm trying to add to the medical knowledge not take away from it.  Give me time to properly finish my edits - I'm a bit busier than the WP trollers and need a few days to get edits finished.  In the ideal situation, someone would help me write what I had started, not revert it.  Do you own a medical book? How do you patrol medical articles without knowledge in that field.  Did I type something that was incorrect? I'm still learning this format so bear with me on that part.  However, the information will never be nonrelevant. [[User:24.205.92.132|24.205.92.132]] 02:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
278507 +++$+++ 24.205.92.132 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278506 +++$+++ 278506 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.174212300E09 +++$+++ I put my ideas on paper while I finish editing the format. What is wrong with that?  Users are supposed to help contribute and that's why there is no one author for an article.  Add to my work, copy-edit the format, don't just delete it, especially when it is relevant.  +++$+++ :I put my ideas on paper while I finish editing the format. What is wrong with that?  Users are supposed to help contribute and that's why there is no one author for an article.  Add to my work, copy-edit the format, don't just delete it, especially when it is relevant. [[User:24.205.92.132|24.205.92.132]] 03:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
278508 +++$+++ 24.205.92.132 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278506 +++$+++ 278507 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.174212540E09 +++$+++ It appears you have some form of bot that assists you with reverted edits faster than users can write articles, what bot might this be?  +++$+++ ::It appears you have some form of bot that assists you with reverted edits faster than users can write articles, what bot might this be? [[User:24.205.92.132|24.205.92.132]] 03:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

16363 +++$+++ Goethean +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16363 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-23 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.235455020E09 +++$+++ I love it how you edit war with me, and then place a warning tag on my talk page. I got to remember that one. &mdash;  +++$+++ I love it how you edit war with me, and then place a warning tag on my talk page. I got to remember that one. &mdash; [[User:Goethean|goethean]] [[User_talk:Goethean|&#2384;]] 21:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
16364 +++$+++ Nvineeth +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16363 +++$+++ 16363 +++$+++ 2009-02-24 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.235484300E09 +++$+++ Goethan, its not just \"you\", make it \"you, Nvineeth and at least 4 more editors\", OK? -- +++$+++ :Goethan, its not just "you", make it "you, Nvineeth and at least 4 more editors", OK? --[[User:Nvineeth|Nvineeth]] ([[User talk:Nvineeth|talk]]) 06:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

540652 +++$+++ Richc80 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-28 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.190969580E09 +++$+++ If you cannot \/ will not restore the article, is it possible for you to just send me the previous content so that I can work from it?  Cheers!  +++$+++ If you cannot / will not restore the article, is it possible for you to just send me the previous content so that I can work from it?  Cheers! [[User:Richc80|Richc80]] 01:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
540653 +++$+++ Richc80 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540652 +++$+++ 540652 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.191042480E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for moving the page to my userspace.  Very much appreciated!  Cheers!  +++$+++ :Thanks so much for moving the page to my userspace.  Very much appreciated!  Cheers! [[User:Richc80|Richc80]] 22:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

46418 +++$+++ Sesu Prime +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-20 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.237595340E09 +++$+++ By the way, I still think the sentence should be removed. I'm just clarifying how \"respectively\" should be used for your own wikibenefit. - +++$+++ By the way, I still think the sentence should be removed. I'm just clarifying how "respectively" should be used for your own wikibenefit. -[[User:Sesu Prime|Sesu Prime]] ([[User talk:Sesu Prime|talk]]) 17:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
46419 +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46418 +++$+++ 46418 +++$+++ 2009-03-20 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.237597320E09 +++$+++ My reply [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Sesu_Prime&diff=278572889&oldid=278558837 here]. ''' +++$+++ :My reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sesu_Prime&diff=278572889&oldid=278558837 here]. '''[[User:Artichoker|<span style="color:#064">Artichoker</span>]]'''<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>'''[[User talk:Artichoker|<span style="color:#000">talk</span>]]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 18:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

16366 +++$+++ Redtigerxyz +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-03 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.236117000E09 +++$+++ Do you any objection if I represent WikiProject Hinduism? Since you are the only one who reacted to the message on Hinduism notice board, asking you. -- +++$+++ Do you any objection if I represent WikiProject Hinduism? Since you are the only one who reacted to the message on Hinduism notice board, asking you. --[[User:Redtigerxyz|<font color = "red" >Redtigerxyz</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 13:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
16367 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16366 +++$+++ 16366 +++$+++ 2009-03-03 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.236117540E09 +++$+++ You have my full support! You are easily one of the most qualified and even handed editors. Let me know if I can ever be of assistance. Thanks.  +++$+++ :You have my full support! You are easily one of the most qualified and even handed editors. Let me know if I can ever be of assistance. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 13:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
16368 +++$+++ Redtigerxyz +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16366 +++$+++ 16367 +++$+++ 2009-03-03 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.236118740E09 +++$+++ Please express your views on Hinduism notice board. -- +++$+++ :: Please express your views on Hinduism notice board. --[[User:Redtigerxyz|<font color = "red" >Redtigerxyz</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 14:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

90109 +++$+++ CruiserTanker +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90109 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-20 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.235158260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:CruiserTanker|CruiserTanker]] ([[User talk:CruiserTanker|talk]]) 11:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
90110 +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90109 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-20 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.235162220E09 +++$+++ Please read [[Wikipedia:No original research]] and [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]], and if you will still be convinced that this film should have an article then, please present reliable sources that report about that film. \"I think the film should have an article\" is not a reason for it to have an article, no matter how many [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|Single-purpose accounts]] say the same thing. -- +++$+++ ::Please read [[Wikipedia:No original research]] and [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]], and if you will still be convinced that this film should have an article then, please present reliable sources that report about that film. "I think the film should have an article" is not a reason for it to have an article, no matter how many [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|Single-purpose accounts]] say the same thing. --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 12:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

16369 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-14 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.237071420E09 +++$+++ Please do not add unproven accusations of murder against living individuals, and please do not re-insert material that has been removed as a [[WP:BLP]] violation, as you do in these six edits.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bill_Ayers&diff=prev&oldid=277081345][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bill_Ayers&diff=prev&oldid=277136697][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bernardine_Dohrn&diff=prev&oldid=277081927][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Weatherman_(organization)&diff=prev&oldid=277158271][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Weatherman_(organization)&diff=prev&oldid=277158271]  I have opened a discussion on the subject at [[Talk:Bill Ayers]]. +++$+++ Please do not add unproven accusations of murder against living individuals, and please do not re-insert material that has been removed as a [[WP:BLP]] violation, as you do in these six edits.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bill_Ayers&diff=prev&oldid=277081345][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bill_Ayers&diff=prev&oldid=277136697][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bernardine_Dohrn&diff=prev&oldid=277081927][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weatherman_(organization)&diff=prev&oldid=277158271][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weatherman_(organization)&diff=prev&oldid=277158271]  I have opened a discussion on the subject at [[Talk:Bill Ayers]].[[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 15:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
16370 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16369 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.237084320E09 +++$+++ [[Fox News]]' article [http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/story\/0,2933,508948,00.html Report: Police Union Accuses Ayers in Deadly 1970 San Francisco Bombing], [[PR Newswire]]'s article [http:\/\/sev.prnewswire.com\/publishing-information-services\/20090305\/PH7903004032009-1.html Attorney General Urged to Investigate Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn by Campaign for Justice for Victims of Weather Underground Terrorism], [[Accuracy in Media]]'s article [http:\/\/www.worldtribune.com\/worldtribune\/WTARC\/2009\/ss_terror0180_03_03.asp Bernadette Dohrn, Bill Ayers and the bomb that killed a cop], and [[Chicagoland's Television]]'s article [http:\/\/www.chicagobreakingnews.com\/2009\/03\/san-francisco-cops-target-bill-ayers.html San Francisco cops target Bill Ayers] are a few good examples of this current event. This event, involving [[San Francisco Police Officers Association]] and Bill Ayers has been well noted by multiple reliable sources that have verified its notability. As such the section should be not be deleted. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::[[Fox News]]' article [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,508948,00.html Report: Police Union Accuses Ayers in Deadly 1970 San Francisco Bombing], [[PR Newswire]]'s article [http://sev.prnewswire.com/publishing-information-services/20090305/PH7903004032009-1.html Attorney General Urged to Investigate Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn by Campaign for Justice for Victims of Weather Underground Terrorism], [[Accuracy in Media]]'s article [http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2009/ss_terror0180_03_03.asp Bernadette Dohrn, Bill Ayers and the bomb that killed a cop], and [[Chicagoland's Television]]'s article [http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/03/san-francisco-cops-target-bill-ayers.html San Francisco cops target Bill Ayers] are a few good examples of this current event. This event, involving [[San Francisco Police Officers Association]] and Bill Ayers has been well noted by multiple reliable sources that have verified its notability. As such the section should be not be deleted. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 19:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
16371 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16369 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.237084980E09 +++$+++ I am deleting again.  '''Do not re-insert BLP violations'''.  You are welcome to discuss on the talk page (although consensus does not justify a BLP vio), and most likely, AN\/I and\/or the BLP noticeboard or an RfC.   +++$+++ :::I am deleting again.  '''Do not re-insert BLP violations'''.  You are welcome to discuss on the talk page (although consensus does not justify a BLP vio), and most likely, AN/I and/or the BLP noticeboard or an RfC.  [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 19:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
16372 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16369 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.237085160E09 +++$+++ You have yet to state how this current event, reported on by mutltiple reliable sources, is a BLP violation. Until you state exactly how this is a BLP violation, you are just making accusations. There are multiple reliable sources that have reported on this event, there is no reason why it should not be included. Reports by mainstream media do not violate BLP - if you disagree - state how.  Thanks.  +++$+++ ::::You have yet to state how this current event, reported on by mutltiple reliable sources, is a BLP violation. Until you state exactly how this is a BLP violation, you are just making accusations. There are multiple reliable sources that have reported on this event, there is no reason why it should not be included. Reports by mainstream media do not violate BLP - if you disagree - state how.  Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 19:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
16373 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16369 +++$+++ 16369 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.237086180E09 +++$+++ '''Final warning'''.  I have instructed you to stop.  You should not be edit warring in the first place, but edit warring to add BLP violations is a serious issue here.  Please self-revert your latest ones; otherwise I will seek to have you blocked from editing to avoid reprinting defamatory accusations like this.  We can discuss in due time.  Incidentally, I have brought this up at [[WP:AN\/I#Bill Ayers \/ BLP vio]].   +++$+++ :'''Final warning'''.  I have instructed you to stop.  You should not be edit warring in the first place, but edit warring to add BLP violations is a serious issue here.  Please self-revert your latest ones; otherwise I will seek to have you blocked from editing to avoid reprinting defamatory accusations like this.  We can discuss in due time.  Incidentally, I have brought this up at [[WP:AN/I#Bill Ayers / BLP vio]].  [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 20:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
16374 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16369 +++$+++ 16373 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.237086660E09 +++$+++ '''Final warning part II''' Your comments have been noted, multiple times. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::'''Final warning part II''' Your comments have been noted, multiple times. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 20:11, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
16375 +++$+++ Wikidemon +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16369 +++$+++ 16374 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.237092660E09 +++$+++ Noting, then continuing to edit war, is the problem.  Anyway, the articles are protected for the moment so you can talk about the substance rather than the process issues around edit warring.  Cheers,   +++$+++ :::Noting, then continuing to edit war, is the problem.  Anyway, the articles are protected for the moment so you can talk about the substance rather than the process issues around edit warring.  Cheers,  [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 21:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

540658 +++$+++ GlassCobra +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540658 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-30 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.191165660E09 +++$+++ Hey, just thought you might like to know that [[ECHO 1]] has been re-created. As the deleting admin, would you mind having a look and seeing if it's been improved since last time? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hey, just thought you might like to know that [[ECHO 1]] has been re-created. As the deleting admin, would you mind having a look and seeing if it's been improved since last time? Thanks. [[User:GlassCobra|Glass]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|Cobra]]''' 08:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
540659 +++$+++ GlassCobra +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540658 +++$+++ 540658 +++$+++ 2007-09-30 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.191206400E09 +++$+++ I'll definitely add my two cents. Thanks and happy editing!  +++$+++ :I'll definitely add my two cents. Thanks and happy editing! [[User:GlassCobra|Glass]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|Cobra]]''' 19:40, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

278521 +++$+++ LaMenta3 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-23 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.174709880E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've noticed that you've participated in several AfD discussions commenting, \"what's with all the porn star articles flocking to WP?\" I commented on one of these but then noticed it on several other discussions, so I thought I'd let you know what was going on. They aren't \"flocking\" to WP by any means; the recent flock of AfDs for their articles, however, is the result of a seemingly disgruntled editor who has been making AfD nominations of pornographic actress' articles in very large numbers for the past week or so. There is a happenstance group of editors, myself included, who have been monitoring his activities in AfD and suspect that he may be doing this to make a [[WP:POINT|point]] by disrupting the AfD process instead of making an attempt to improve these articles when possible (and it has been possible as I have improved a good number of them), which is the preferred course of action in these cases. Just FYI.  +++$+++ Hi, I've noticed that you've participated in several AfD discussions commenting, "what's with all the porn star articles flocking to WP?" I commented on one of these but then noticed it on several other discussions, so I thought I'd let you know what was going on. They aren't "flocking" to WP by any means; the recent flock of AfDs for their articles, however, is the result of a seemingly disgruntled editor who has been making AfD nominations of pornographic actress' articles in very large numbers for the past week or so. There is a happenstance group of editors, myself included, who have been monitoring his activities in AfD and suspect that he may be doing this to make a [[WP:POINT|point]] by disrupting the AfD process instead of making an attempt to improve these articles when possible (and it has been possible as I have improved a good number of them), which is the preferred course of action in these cases. Just FYI. [[User:LaMenta3|LaMenta3]] 21:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
278522 +++$+++ Tabercil +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278521 +++$+++ 278521 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.174711980E09 +++$+++ Indeed. The editor in question is [[User:Epbr123|Epbr123]], and since March 14th I've counted 24 separate porn articles he's put up for AFD including 11 today.  +++$+++ * Indeed. The editor in question is [[User:Epbr123|Epbr123]], and since March 14th I've counted 24 separate porn articles he's put up for AFD including 11 today. [[User:Tabercil|Tabercil]] 21:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
278523 +++$+++ Rschen7754 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278521 +++$+++ 278521 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.174800000E09 +++$+++ <small>Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? &ndash; [[Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads\/Newsletter|It's all here.]] \u2014{{{1|}}} --''' +++$+++ :<small>Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? &ndash; [[Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter|It's all here.]] —{{{1|}}} --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rschen7754]]''' ([[User_talk:Rschen7754|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|contribs]]) 22:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

16379 +++$+++ Biophys +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16379 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-17 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.237279980E09 +++$+++ You nominated for deletion a huge series of \"criticism\" articles. This has been debated numerous times, and the articles were kept. It would be huge waste of time for many users to vote in all these unnecessary AfD nominations. I reported this to [[WP:ANI]], and you are welcome to explain your actions. Thank you. +++$+++ You nominated for deletion a huge series of "criticism" articles. This has been debated numerous times, and the articles were kept. It would be huge waste of time for many users to vote in all these unnecessary AfD nominations. I reported this to [[WP:ANI]], and you are welcome to explain your actions. Thank you.[[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys|talk]]) 01:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
16380 +++$+++ Malcolmxl5 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16379 +++$+++ 16379 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.237280220E09 +++$+++ I'm inclined to agree with S Marshall[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FCriticism_of_Sylvia_Browne&diff=277774990&oldid=277774610] and suggest that a RFC for all \"criticism of\" articles would be the way to go. -- +++$+++ : I'm inclined to agree with S Marshall[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FCriticism_of_Sylvia_Browne&diff=277774990&oldid=277774610] and suggest that a RFC for all "criticism of" articles would be the way to go. --[[User:Malcolmxl5|Malcolmxl5]] ([[User talk:Malcolmxl5|talk]]) 01:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
16381 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16379 +++$+++ 16380 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.237280460E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I appreciate the advice and will pause for some time on Afds, though there are a few that need editing. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Thank you. I appreciate the advice and will pause for some time on Afds, though there are a few that need editing. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 02:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
16382 +++$+++ Biophys +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16379 +++$+++ 16381 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.237281660E09 +++$+++ Then you should nominate for deletion the entire [[:Category:Criticisms]] with all its sub-categories. Please realize: criticism is healthy, criticism is good. As a professional researcher, I can assure that criticism is enormously helpful in scientific work, as in any other area of human activity. +++$+++ :::Then you should nominate for deletion the entire [[:Category:Criticisms]] with all its sub-categories. Please realize: criticism is healthy, criticism is good. As a professional researcher, I can assure that criticism is enormously helpful in scientific work, as in any other area of human activity.[[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys|talk]]) 02:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

278524 +++$+++ Jonomacdrones +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278524 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-25 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.174810200E09 +++$+++ I think the page is actually an autobiography. I'll not replace your tag, but if you feel i am right then you can. [[Cheers]], '' +++$+++ I think the page is actually an autobiography. I'll not replace your tag, but if you feel i am right then you can. [[Cheers]], ''[[User:Jonomacdrones|Jonomacdrones]] ''' <sub> ([[user_talk:Jonomacdrones|talk]]) </sub>'' ''' 01:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
278525 +++$+++ Jonomacdrones +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278524 +++$+++ 278524 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.174810740E09 +++$+++ Yeah, i think you're right, although i'm sure i've seen one. I think you need to add a custom tag like <nowiki>{{db|Autobiographies are uncool and you are for adding one}}<\/nowiki>... somthing like that. Or you could slap some NPOV tags on, since one cannot be neutral about one's self. sorry i couldn't be clearer. [[Cheers]], '' +++$+++ :Yeah, i think you're right, although i'm sure i've seen one. I think you need to add a custom tag like <nowiki>{{db|Autobiographies are uncool and you are for adding one}}</nowiki>... somthing like that. Or you could slap some NPOV tags on, since one cannot be neutral about one's self. sorry i couldn't be clearer. [[Cheers]], ''[[User:Jonomacdrones|Jonomacdrones]] ''' <sub> ([[user_talk:Jonomacdrones|talk]]) </sub>'' ''' 01:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

527018 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.206609780E09 +++$+++ Good news, [[User:FieldMarine]] has agreed to join us in making sure that those who add names to the list will follow the \"rules\".  +++$+++ Good news, [[User:FieldMarine]] has agreed to join us in making sure that those who add names to the list will follow the "rules". [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 02:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
527019 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527018 +++$+++ 527018 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.206613140E09 +++$+++ The other list criteria is just an example. More or less of an idea. I'm absolutely sure that with time you can develope a concept that we will be able use as a criteria for the USMC list.   +++$+++ *The other list criteria is just an example. More or less of an idea. I'm absolutely sure that with time you can develope a concept that we will be able use as a criteria for the USMC list.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 03:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

576662 +++$+++ Jimfbleak +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576662 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-01 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.230852600E09 +++$+++ Happy New Year to you too  +++$+++ Happy New Year to you too [[User:Jimfbleak|jimfbleak]] ([[User talk:Jimfbleak|talk]]) 15:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
576663 +++$+++ BusterD +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576662 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-01 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.230853620E09 +++$+++ Me too. The best from me and mine to you and yours.  +++$+++ ::Me too. The best from me and mine to you and yours. [[User:BusterD|BusterD]] ([[User talk:BusterD|talk]]) 15:47, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
576664 +++$+++ Antandrus +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576662 +++$+++ 576662 +++$+++ 2009-01-01 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.230861240E09 +++$+++ Happy new year, MONGO -- hope it's a good one for you.  2008 has been a bit of a stinker (the year when I learned the etymology of the word \"broker\", LOL).  Cheers,  +++$+++ :Happy new year, MONGO -- hope it's a good one for you.  2008 has been a bit of a stinker (the year when I learned the etymology of the word "broker", LOL).  Cheers, [[User:Antandrus|Antandrus ]] [[User_talk:Antandrus|(talk)]] 17:54, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

16384 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16384 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-17 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.237344600E09 +++$+++ I have started Hridaya Caitanya Dasa \u200earticle. Should you know of any sources to add to it, please do not hesitate to add. He is a GBC member since 2002. <span style=\"font-family:Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ I have started Hridaya Caitanya Dasa ‎article. Should you know of any sources to add to it, please do not hesitate to add. He is a GBC member since 2002. <span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:Wikidas|Wikidās ॐ]]</span> 19:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
16385 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16384 +++$+++ 16384 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.237346460E09 +++$+++ Thanks - <span style=\"font-family:Tahoma;\"> +++$+++ :Thanks - <span style="font-family:Tahoma;">[[User:Wikidas|Wikidās ॐ]]</span> 20:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

540673 +++$+++ Bbatsell +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-06 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.191680280E09 +++$+++ After a [[Real life|RL]]-induced delay, I've responded to your note on [[User talk:bbatsell#DRV|my talk page]].  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ After a [[Real life|RL]]-induced delay, I've responded to your note on [[User talk:bbatsell#DRV|my talk page]].  Regards, —[[User:Bbatsell|<span style="color:#333;font-weight:bold;">bbatsell</span>]] [[User_talk:Bbatsell|<span style="color:#C46100;font-size:0.75em;">¿?</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Bbatsell|<span style="color:#2C9191;">✍</span>]] 07:18, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
540674 +++$+++ Bbatsell +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540673 +++$+++ 540673 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191927060E09 +++$+++ \xd72.  \u2014 +++$+++ :×2.  —[[User:Bbatsell|<span style="color:#333;font-weight:bold">bbatsell</span>]] [[User_talk:Bbatsell|<span style="color:#C46100;font-size:0.75em;">¿?</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Bbatsell|<span style="color:#2C9191;">✍</span>]] 03:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

278530 +++$+++ Qrc2006 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278530 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.175845620E09 +++$+++ so what's your beef with the article?[[User talk:Qrc2006|<sup>'''T''' ''ALK''<\/sup>]]\u2022 +++$+++ so what's your beef with the article?[[User talk:Qrc2006|<sup>'''T''' ''ALK''</sup>]]•[[User:Qrc2006|<sup>Q</sup><small>R</small><sub>C</sub>2006]]•[[Special:Contributions/Qrc2006|¢ʘñ†®¡ß§]] 00:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
278531 +++$+++ Qrc2006 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278530 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.175846040E09 +++$+++ ok, cool, it passes the google test i think and i shouldve written a little more for its first version to avoid your ax. =P  [[User talk:Qrc2006|<sup>'''T''' ''ALK''<\/sup>]]\u2022 +++$+++ ::ok, cool, it passes the google test i think and i shouldve written a little more for its first version to avoid your ax. =P  [[User talk:Qrc2006|<sup>'''T''' ''ALK''</sup>]]•[[User:Qrc2006|<sup>Q</sup><small>R</small><sub>C</sub>2006]]•[[Special:Contributions/Qrc2006|¢ʘñ†®¡ß§]] 00:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
278532 +++$+++ Rschen7754bot +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278530 +++$+++ 278530 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.175931120E09 +++$+++ <small>Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? &ndash; [[Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads\/Newsletter|It's all here.]] \u2014 +++$+++ :<small>Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? &ndash; [[Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter|It's all here.]] —[[User:Rschen7754bot|Rschen7754bot]] 00:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

540675 +++$+++ Anetode +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-07 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.191741360E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I clicked the restore button before typing in a reason. Please see my comment at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Radio Kaleidoscope]] for an explanation. \u02c9\u02c9<sup> +++$+++ Sorry, I clicked the restore button before typing in a reason. Please see my comment at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Kaleidoscope]] for an explanation. ˉˉ<sup>[[User:Anetode|'''anetode''']]</sup>[[User_talk:Anetode|╦╩]] 00:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
540676 +++$+++ Anetode +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540675 +++$+++ 540675 +++$+++ 2007-10-07 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.191741780E09 +++$+++ Ah, that makes sense. I think the copyright issue with the article is a little too convoluted for speedy deletion. Anyway, thanks for understanding. \u02c9\u02c9<sup> +++$+++ :Ah, that makes sense. I think the copyright issue with the article is a little too convoluted for speedy deletion. Anyway, thanks for understanding. ˉˉ<sup>[[User:Anetode|'''anetode''']]</sup>[[User_talk:Anetode|╦╩]] 00:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

570710 +++$+++  +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-19 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.240135380E09 +++$+++ I have a question for you at [[User:Drilnoth\/codefixer.js\/doc]], if you could take a look (and watchlist the page until the discussion ends, if you haven't already). Thanks! \u2013 +++$+++ I have a question for you at [[User:Drilnoth/codefixer.js/doc]], if you could take a look (and watchlist the page until the discussion ends, if you haven't already). Thanks! –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]] • [[Special:Log/Drilnoth|L]]) 03:03, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
570711 +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ Davidgothberg +++$+++ 570710 +++$+++ 570710 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.240303440E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] ([[User talk:Davidgothberg#top|talk]]) 01:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

540678 +++$+++ Bearian +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-09 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.191987600E09 +++$+++ Thank you for supporting [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Bearian|my RfA]], which passed 63 to 1.  I am especially thankful because we don't agree on deletion very often, and you supported me anyway.  I hope that I'm doing a good job so far. I have a [[User:Bearian\/Deletions|deletion sub-page]] if you are interested.  +++$+++ Thank you for supporting [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bearian|my RfA]], which passed 63 to 1.  I am especially thankful because we don't agree on deletion very often, and you supported me anyway.  I hope that I'm doing a good job so far. I have a [[User:Bearian/Deletions|deletion sub-page]] if you are interested. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] 20:40, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
540679 +++$+++ Bearian +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540678 +++$+++ 540678 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.191988620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the back-up.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the back-up. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] 20:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

540681 +++$+++ 1of3 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-10 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.192012500E09 +++$+++ Would you please restore [[Phase vocoder\/Phase vocoder and encoder in MATLAB]].  It was deleted as a prod, and I'd like to take a look at it.  Maybe it would be good in Wikisource?  +++$+++ Would you please restore [[Phase vocoder/Phase vocoder and encoder in MATLAB]].  It was deleted as a prod, and I'd like to take a look at it.  Maybe it would be good in Wikisource? [[User:1of3|1of3]] 03:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
540682 +++$+++ 1of3 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540681 +++$+++ 540681 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.192014120E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I moved it to Wikibooks.  Please re-delete it.  +++$+++ :Thank you, I moved it to Wikibooks.  Please re-delete it. [[User:1of3|1of3]] 04:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
540683 +++$+++ 1of3 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540681 +++$+++ 540681 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.192017540E09 +++$+++ The da Vinci barnstar is the only one related to admin work I could find.  +++$+++ :The da Vinci barnstar is the only one related to admin work I could find. [[User:1of3|1of3]] 04:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

16394 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16394 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-12 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.242155400E09 +++$+++ I think you were probably just taking a joke too literally, but I suggest undoing the recent additions of the LJ AFD to miscellaneous deletion discussion lists. It's possible to go too far, and that was probably over the line. See [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#WP:Pointy-ness at Afd]]. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ I think you were probably just taking a joke too literally, but I suggest undoing the recent additions of the LJ AFD to miscellaneous deletion discussion lists. It's possible to go too far, and that was probably over the line. See [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#WP:Pointy-ness at Afd]]. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 12:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
16395 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16394 +++$+++ 16394 +++$+++ 2009-05-12 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.242155760E09 +++$+++ I didn't add them. I only noted on the page that they had been added. Remove them from the listings if you want. Thanks.  +++$+++ :I didn't add them. I only noted on the page that they had been added. Remove them from the listings if you want. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 12:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
16396 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16394 +++$+++ 16395 +++$+++ 2009-05-12 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.242157380E09 +++$+++ My apologies - I confused you with another editor. I retract my statement entirely. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::My apologies - I confused you with another editor. I retract my statement entirely. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 12:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

16398 +++$+++  +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-30 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.246360860E09 +++$+++ Hello. Several days ago you added the \"Under Construction\" template to this article, but you haven't made any changes since then. Should the banner be removed, or do you intend to edit the article in the next few days? \u2014 [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;{{toolbar|separator=dot|[[::User talk:Malik Shabazz|talk]] | [[::Special:Contributions\/Malik Shabazz|contribs]] }} 04:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ Hello. Several days ago you added the "Under Construction" template to this article, but you haven't made any changes since then. Should the banner be removed, or do you intend to edit the article in the next few days? — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;{{toolbar|separator=dot|[[::User talk:Malik Shabazz|talk]] | [[::Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]] }} 04:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
16399 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16398 +++$+++ 16398 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.247975280E09 +++$+++ in your edits on sdg's page you used source that is not used anywhere in the wikipedia as a reliable source. are you sure you want to keep it? It is a blog site as per page titles that only on occasion publishes official responses for blogger? does not suit BLP sourcing, especially if person himself does not want the item being mentioned? please reply here. thanks  +++$+++ :in your edits on sdg's page you used source that is not used anywhere in the wikipedia as a reliable source. are you sure you want to keep it? It is a blog site as per page titles that only on occasion publishes official responses for blogger? does not suit BLP sourcing, especially if person himself does not want the item being mentioned? please reply here. thanks [[User:Wikidas|<span style=" font-weight:bolder; background-color:white; color:#FFCC33; border-bottom:2px solid #FFCC33">Wikid</span>]][[User talk:Wikidas|<sup><span style="font-weight:bolder; border-bottom:0px solid;">as<i>&#169;</i></span></sup>]] 20:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
16400 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16398 +++$+++ 16399 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.247983020E09 +++$+++ I am very open to discussion.  The Dandavats website is edited by [[Pragosha Dasa]], a member of [[ISKCON]]'s [[Governing Body Commission]], and a disciple of [[Satsvarupa dasa Goswami]].  In the references used, Dandavats cites both a GBC Executive Committee report, and a letter from Satsvarupa dasa Goswami. This is valid information, from a verifiable source, that is directly related to teh Satsvarupa dasa Goswami article. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::I am very open to discussion.  The Dandavats website is edited by [[Pragosha Dasa]], a member of [[ISKCON]]'s [[Governing Body Commission]], and a disciple of [[Satsvarupa dasa Goswami]].  In the references used, Dandavats cites both a GBC Executive Committee report, and a letter from Satsvarupa dasa Goswami. This is valid information, from a verifiable source, that is directly related to teh Satsvarupa dasa Goswami article. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 22:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
16401 +++$+++ Wikidas +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16398 +++$+++ 16400 +++$+++ 2009-07-19 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.248012180E09 +++$+++ I do not think that just a 'disciple' publishes something about someone it becomes a reliable source. Source clearly states, \"blog archive\" - blogs are not acceptable as reliable or verifiable sources, unless they are quoted by reliable secondary sources. It is primary information (primary source?) at best that does not deserve to be included in the Wikipedia, unless it have been already included in secondary reliable sources, that are plentiful. In other words wiki isn't the ''first'' place where information is published; it's just a collection of important information that has been published by the reliable sources.  If it was really important, then the newspapers, the religion magazines, or the proper major online sources that write about Krishna Consciousness, such as iskcon.com would mention it, I would not even suggest academic sources or newspapers, that would be better. Dandavats or chakra blog site is not such a source and never will be accepted as such, regardless of what they have published. Do you have ANY other reliable sources that can support this? If not then we can just stick with the good sources quoting GBC executive body, if there are any. Only then GBC EC views can considered notable for inclusion on Wiki. It seems that you confuse verifiable and reliable. I do not have a prejudice on inclusion sources that are fine with [[WP:BLP|the policy on living people]].  +++$+++ :::I do not think that just a 'disciple' publishes something about someone it becomes a reliable source. Source clearly states, "blog archive" - blogs are not acceptable as reliable or verifiable sources, unless they are quoted by reliable secondary sources. It is primary information (primary source?) at best that does not deserve to be included in the Wikipedia, unless it have been already included in secondary reliable sources, that are plentiful. In other words wiki isn't the ''first'' place where information is published; it's just a collection of important information that has been published by the reliable sources.  If it was really important, then the newspapers, the religion magazines, or the proper major online sources that write about Krishna Consciousness, such as iskcon.com would mention it, I would not even suggest academic sources or newspapers, that would be better. Dandavats or chakra blog site is not such a source and never will be accepted as such, regardless of what they have published. Do you have ANY other reliable sources that can support this? If not then we can just stick with the good sources quoting GBC executive body, if there are any. Only then GBC EC views can considered notable for inclusion on Wiki. It seems that you confuse verifiable and reliable. I do not have a prejudice on inclusion sources that are fine with [[WP:BLP|the policy on living people]]. [[User:Wikidas|<span style=" font-weight:bolder; background-color:white; color:#FFCC33; border-bottom:2px solid #FFCC33">Wikid</span>]][[User talk:Wikidas|<sup><span style="font-weight:bolder; border-bottom:0px solid;">as<i>&#169;</i></span></sup>]] 07:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

540688 +++$+++ MD12752 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-11 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.192102020E09 +++$+++ In fact, I just put a suggestion there and I wouldn't be surprised if he tried to eliminate me.  If so, you should make the correction to the Prentice Position article.  It has a major error.  +++$+++ In fact, I just put a suggestion there and I wouldn't be surprised if he tried to eliminate me.  If so, you should make the correction to the Prentice Position article.  It has a major error. [[User:MD12752|MD12752]] 04:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
540689 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540688 +++$+++ 540688 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.192144980E09 +++$+++ FYI: This is another sock of banned user Dereks1x, posting in evasion of his ban (the third one uncovered yesterday); account is now blocked. <strong> +++$+++ :FYI: This is another sock of banned user Dereks1x, posting in evasion of his ban (the third one uncovered yesterday); account is now blocked. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 16:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

278545 +++$+++ Commking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278545 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.176722700E09 +++$+++ Hi there - [[Pars Online]] is an article I believe to be notable. Please check out the talk page there for my comments. -- +++$+++ Hi there - [[Pars Online]] is an article I believe to be notable. Please check out the talk page there for my comments. --[[User:Commking|Commking]] 04:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
278546 +++$+++ Commking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278545 +++$+++ 278545 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.176748500E09 +++$+++ Somebody else deleted the speedy delete tag already - thanks. -- +++$+++ :Somebody else deleted the speedy delete tag already - thanks. --[[User:Commking|Commking]] 11:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

540694 +++$+++ heltzen +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540694 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-12 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.192212660E09 +++$+++ Hi, I created the category related with mini-stars for the de-clutering WikiProject Keep It Simple(see WP:KIS). No self-agrandizement there, just to know who has got and who didn't. Can be renamed [[:Category:Wikipedians who received barnstars]]  Dime lo que piensas, si ? <font face=\"georgia\"> +++$+++ Hi, I created the category related with mini-stars for the de-clutering WikiProject Keep It Simple(see WP:KIS). No self-agrandizement there, just to know who has got and who didn't. Can be renamed [[:Category:Wikipedians who received barnstars]]  Dime lo que piensas, si ? <font face="georgia">[[User:heltzen|Heltzen]][[User talk:heltzen|◩]]</font> 11:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
540695 +++$+++ heltzen +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540694 +++$+++ 540694 +++$+++ 2007-10-12 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.192249740E09 +++$+++ The reason why there are so few entries in the category is because only the mini-stars are categorising, the traditional barnstars are not. Anyway, your explanation makes sense, you have all the reason, go ahead and delete.<font face=\"georgia\"> +++$+++ :The reason why there are so few entries in the category is because only the mini-stars are categorising, the traditional barnstars are not. Anyway, your explanation makes sense, you have all the reason, go ahead and delete.<font face="georgia">[[User:heltzen|Heltzen]][[User talk:heltzen|◩]]</font> 21:29, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
540696 +++$+++ heltzen +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540694 +++$+++ 540695 +++$+++ 2007-10-12 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.192251720E09 +++$+++ I have updated all the templates categorising to that category. As I am the creator and agree to deletion with the nominator (you), and no one else has touched the category, as per policy you can just go ahead and delete. <font face=\"georgia\"> +++$+++ ::I have updated all the templates categorising to that category. As I am the creator and agree to deletion with the nominator (you), and no one else has touched the category, as per policy you can just go ahead and delete. <font face="georgia">[[User:heltzen|Heltzen]][[User talk:heltzen|◩]]</font> 22:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

278551 +++$+++ Jared +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278551 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-19 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.176977520E09 +++$+++ Yeah, this whole ordeal is getting out of hand. It's so wonderful that people are able to collaborate together on an article that is really not half bad (except for that it's humongous!) but when people start doing stupid stuff, like making pages that are either redundant of material already on the root page, or are totally not worth making a page of at all, it just makes more work for others. But whatever. We all know it happens every time something big happens. Had you not AfD'd that article, I probably would have done so myself. <sub>\u2514<\/sub><sup>''' +++$+++ Yeah, this whole ordeal is getting out of hand. It's so wonderful that people are able to collaborate together on an article that is really not half bad (except for that it's humongous!) but when people start doing stupid stuff, like making pages that are either redundant of material already on the root page, or are totally not worth making a page of at all, it just makes more work for others. But whatever. We all know it happens every time something big happens. Had you not AfD'd that article, I probably would have done so myself. <sub>└</sub><sup>'''[[User:Jared|<font color="#0084C9">Jared</font>]]'''</sup><sub>┘</sub><sup>┌</sup><sub>''[[User talk:Jared|<font color="#009E49">talk</font>]]''</sub><sup>┐</sup>  03:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
278552 +++$+++ Jared +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278551 +++$+++ 278551 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.176978480E09 +++$+++ On a semi-related note, I think that as long as we wait a while, things will cool down (or should at least) and any stray articles that should be merged back into the parent article would be better taken care of then. <sub>\u2514<\/sub><sup>''' +++$+++ :On a semi-related note, I think that as long as we wait a while, things will cool down (or should at least) and any stray articles that should be merged back into the parent article would be better taken care of then. <sub>└</sub><sup>'''[[User:Jared|<font color="#0084C9">Jared</font>]]'''</sup><sub>┘</sub><sup>┌</sup><sub>''[[User talk:Jared|<font color="#009E49">talk</font>]]''</sub><sup>┐</sup>  03:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

278553 +++$+++ Jimmi Hugh +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278553 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-19 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.176989280E09 +++$+++ I am afraid that whether you agree with my tone or comments or not, you have no right to delete my comments. I made a valid point and did not insult anyone directly even if i went of on a slight tangent at the general state of things causings people irrational arguments. Please refrain from deleting my comments in the future! -- +++$+++ I am afraid that whether you agree with my tone or comments or not, you have no right to delete my comments. I made a valid point and did not insult anyone directly even if i went of on a slight tangent at the general state of things causings people irrational arguments. Please refrain from deleting my comments in the future! --[[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] 06:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
278554 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278553 +++$+++ 278553 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.176989400E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid you're mistaken; I've not deleted any comments of yours, at least not intentionally. If, by chance, I have done so by mistake, I apologize. -- +++$+++ :I'm afraid you're mistaken; I've not deleted any comments of yours, at least not intentionally. If, by chance, I have done so by mistake, I apologize. --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] 06:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
278555 +++$+++ Jimmi Hugh +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278553 +++$+++ 278554 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.176989580E09 +++$+++ In that case sorry, i did wonder given you made numerous other changes also... and as mine was the bottom post it was probably caught of in some copy operating... no problems! -- +++$+++ ::In that case sorry, i did wonder given you made numerous other changes also... and as mine was the bottom post it was probably caught of in some copy operating... no problems! --[[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] 06:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

585392 +++$+++ Razorflame +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585392 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-16 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.208385960E09 +++$+++ Thank you for reviewing my request!  I hope to not let you down now that you've given me the rollback function!  Cheers,  +++$+++ Thank you for reviewing my request!  I hope to not let you down now that you've given me the rollback function!  Cheers, [[User:Razorflame|Razorflame]] ([[User talk:Razorflame|talk]]) 15:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
585393 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585392 +++$+++ 585392 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.208386200E09 +++$+++ You're welcome for rollback. :) For practice, you may want to see [[Wikipedia:New admin school\/Rollback]]. Good luck.  +++$+++ :You're welcome for rollback. :) For practice, you may want to see [[Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback]]. Good luck. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 15:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
585394 +++$+++ Razorflame +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585392 +++$+++ 585393 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.208386440E09 +++$+++ Just a question, but what are the warnings for vandalism and removing content here?  I am somewhat new to this Wikipedia, but I am a veteran of the Simple English Wikipedia, so I know how to warn someone, it's just that I don't know the warnings here.  Please respond on my talk page.  Thanks,  +++$+++ ::Just a question, but what are the warnings for vandalism and removing content here?  I am somewhat new to this Wikipedia, but I am a veteran of the Simple English Wikipedia, so I know how to warn someone, it's just that I don't know the warnings here.  Please respond on my talk page.  Thanks, [[User:Razorflame|Razorflame]] ([[User talk:Razorflame|talk]]) 15:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
585395 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585392 +++$+++ 585394 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.208386680E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Template messages\/User talk namespace]] lists all the warnings, and not just for vandalism and blanking.  +++$+++ :::[[Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace]] lists all the warnings, and not just for vandalism and blanking. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 15:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

278556 +++$+++ Jimmi Hugh +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-19 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.177034820E09 +++$+++ Do you know if there is a way Adminisrators can delete a topic without waiting for the 5 day discussion, given that all the keeps in the discussion do not have anything todo with policy? -- +++$+++ Do you know if there is a way Adminisrators can delete a topic without waiting for the 5 day discussion, given that all the keeps in the discussion do not have anything todo with policy? --[[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] 19:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
278557 +++$+++ Jimmi Hugh +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278556 +++$+++ 278556 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.177038600E09 +++$+++ Yes, thankyou. I did think it was probable that any sort of disagreement qualified it for debate whether the discussion followed policy or not. In related news, i apologize for my excessive commenting last night... i was basically living of the commenting while trying to stay awake with a concussion. -- +++$+++ :Yes, thankyou. I did think it was probable that any sort of disagreement qualified it for debate whether the discussion followed policy or not. In related news, i apologize for my excessive commenting last night... i was basically living of the commenting while trying to stay awake with a concussion. --[[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] 20:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

308570 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308570 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-08 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.207713060E09 +++$+++ I doubt the choice of username is enough to prevent the inevitable: {{user5|1=FilaNoBlock}} \u2013 +++$+++ I doubt the choice of username is enough to prevent the inevitable: {{user5|1=FilaNoBlock}} –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 20:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
308571 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308570 +++$+++ 308570 +++$+++ 2008-04-09 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.207791240E09 +++$+++ Just found another one: {{user5|1=IloveTrains}} \u2013 +++$+++ :Just found another one: {{user5|1=IloveTrains}} –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 18:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
308572 +++$+++ Signalhead +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308570 +++$+++ 308571 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.208144880E09 +++$+++ This one was created today: {{user5|1=FilaNeverBlock}} \u2013 +++$+++ ::This one was created today: {{user5|1=FilaNeverBlock}} –[[User:Signalhead|<span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="red">'''S'''ignal</font><font color="green">head</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Signalhead|<font color="black"><sup>&lt;<small>&nbsp;'''T'''&nbsp;</small>&gt;]]</sup></font></span> 20:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

352261 +++$+++ Glen Dillon +++$+++ Martyman +++$+++ 352261 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-05 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.220651040E09 +++$+++ Hi. I was looking for a template to use as the basis for a location map for the Dampier to Bunbury Natural Gas Pipeline.  Found one of yours (Perth locator-MJC.png) and made some modifications.  The end result is Image:DBNGP.png.  Please forgive me if I've contravened your rights re: your original work.  Can you have a quick look at how I've treated the licensing issues. I'm pretty sure I've botched the license attributes by not properly acknowledging your original work or whatever. E.g. even though I've mentioned you in the description field, I seem to be claiming my new map as an original work. Please set me straight if I've gone down the wrong track entirely.  Apologies in advance etc...my humble excuse is -I'm only new at this! -- +++$+++ Hi. I was looking for a template to use as the basis for a location map for the Dampier to Bunbury Natural Gas Pipeline.  Found one of yours (Perth locator-MJC.png) and made some modifications.  The end result is Image:DBNGP.png.  Please forgive me if I've contravened your rights re: your original work.  Can you have a quick look at how I've treated the licensing issues. I'm pretty sure I've botched the license attributes by not properly acknowledging your original work or whatever. E.g. even though I've mentioned you in the description field, I seem to be claiming my new map as an original work. Please set me straight if I've gone down the wrong track entirely.  Apologies in advance etc...my humble excuse is -I'm only new at this! --[[User:Glen Dillon|Glen Dillon]] ([[User talk:Glen Dillon|talk]]) 14:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
352262 +++$+++ Glen Dillon +++$+++ Martyman +++$+++ 352261 +++$+++ 352261 +++$+++ 2008-09-07 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.220813100E09 +++$+++ Furthermore, I may have selected the wrong license type for my map...given that my work is a derivative of yours, I might not have a right to release mine to 'public domain'. Your thoughts?-- +++$+++ : Furthermore, I may have selected the wrong license type for my map...given that my work is a derivative of yours, I might not have a right to release mine to 'public domain'. Your thoughts?--[[User:Glen Dillon|Glen Dillon]] ([[User talk:Glen Dillon|talk]]) 11:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

278561 +++$+++ DXRAW +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-21 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.177222800E09 +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|left]] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit warring]], even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|repeatedly revert edits]], but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->  +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|left]] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit warring]], even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|repeatedly revert edits]], but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:DXRAW|DXRAW]] 23:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
278562 +++$+++ Uncle G +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278561 +++$+++ 278561 +++$+++ 2007-04-22 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.177235940E09 +++$+++ I notice that you actually [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Chicago_Sun-Times&diff=124726994&oldid=124726256 reverted yourself] to avoid an edit war and took the discussion to the article's talk page some while before {{user|DXRAW}} wrote the above.  Well done.  Please note that xe is not an administrator.   +++$+++ *I notice that you actually [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chicago_Sun-Times&diff=124726994&oldid=124726256 reverted yourself] to avoid an edit war and took the discussion to the article's talk page some while before {{user|DXRAW}} wrote the above.  Well done.  Please note that xe is not an administrator.  [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 02:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

16419 +++$+++ Tcncv +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16419 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-22 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.271921160E09 +++$+++ I am looking into this, but until I look further into the facts, I am considering this to be a content dispute.  As such, I should caution you against continued reverts per the [[WP:3RR]].  Please do not take offense.  I need to remain fair an neutral - warning all parties equally.  --  +++$+++ I am looking into this, but until I look further into the facts, I am considering this to be a content dispute.  As such, I should caution you against continued reverts per the [[WP:3RR]].  Please do not take offense.  I need to remain fair an neutral - warning all parties equally.  -- [[User:Tcncv|<font style="color:maroon;">'''''Tom&nbsp;N'''''</font>&nbsp;(tcncv)]]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Tcncv|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Tcncv|contrib]]</small> 00:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
16420 +++$+++ Tcncv +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16419 +++$+++ 16419 +++$+++ 2010-04-22 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.271925600E09 +++$+++ I have protected the [[Rashad Hussain]] since you both continue to edit in violation of the 3RR.  On a review of recent edits, I see that there are reliable sources supporting multiple points of view.  I am hoping that the two of you will take this to the talk page and attempt to work out a compromise that fairly presents material from all sides.  The goal is not to reach a conclusion of fact, but to present available information in a neutral manner.  I hope you will work together toward a resolution of this dispute.  If necessary please make use of the resources described in [[WP:Dispute resolution]].  --  +++$+++ :I have protected the [[Rashad Hussain]] since you both continue to edit in violation of the 3RR.  On a review of recent edits, I see that there are reliable sources supporting multiple points of view.  I am hoping that the two of you will take this to the talk page and attempt to work out a compromise that fairly presents material from all sides.  The goal is not to reach a conclusion of fact, but to present available information in a neutral manner.  I hope you will work together toward a resolution of this dispute.  If necessary please make use of the resources described in [[WP:Dispute resolution]].  -- [[User:Tcncv|<font style="color:maroon;">'''''Tom&nbsp;N'''''</font>&nbsp;(tcncv)]]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Tcncv|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Tcncv|contrib]]</small> 01:40, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

278565 +++$+++ The way, the truth, and the light +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278565 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-22 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.177274820E09 +++$+++ Now that I understand speedy deletion, I see your point. However creating pages from IPs is banned and I can't see how that's any more dangerous than allowing new accounts to do it.  +++$+++ Now that I understand speedy deletion, I see your point. However creating pages from IPs is banned and I can't see how that's any more dangerous than allowing new accounts to do it. [[User:The way, the truth, and the light|The way, the truth, and the light]] 13:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
278566 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278565 +++$+++ 278565 +++$+++ 2007-04-22 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.177275660E09 +++$+++ I understand your frustration, and at times I share it. But in the eyes of many (including myself) the benefits certainly outweigh the risks. -- +++$+++ :I understand your frustration, and at times I share it. But in the eyes of many (including myself) the benefits certainly outweigh the risks. --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] 14:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
278567 +++$+++ The way, the truth, and the light +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278565 +++$+++ 278566 +++$+++ 2007-04-22 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.177276980E09 +++$+++ Please don't split a discussion across different talk pages. My main point was that there doesn't seem to be any reason to treat new accounts differently from IPs in this matter.  +++$+++ ::Please don't split a discussion across different talk pages. My main point was that there doesn't seem to be any reason to treat new accounts differently from IPs in this matter. [[User:The way, the truth, and the light|The way, the truth, and the light]] 14:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

540710 +++$+++ Espresso Addict +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-21 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.192962600E09 +++$+++ I've removed the prod tag on [[Bruce Lawrence]]. The director of a centre at a major university is likely to be notable, and I don't believe lack of references is an automatic reason for deletion of articles on living people, as long as no material included could be considered defamatory. Moreover a cursory search at the Duke website found a reference supporting his directorship there. Regards,  +++$+++ I've removed the prod tag on [[Bruce Lawrence]]. The director of a centre at a major university is likely to be notable, and I don't believe lack of references is an automatic reason for deletion of articles on living people, as long as no material included could be considered defamatory. Moreover a cursory search at the Duke website found a reference supporting his directorship there. Regards, [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] 03:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
540711 +++$+++ Espresso Addict +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540710 +++$+++ 540710 +++$+++ 2007-10-21 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.192964280E09 +++$+++ Also [[Michael Spence (academic)]]. I'm unsure what the BLP concerns here are.  +++$+++ :Also [[Michael Spence (academic)]]. I'm unsure what the BLP concerns here are. [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] 03:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
540712 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540710 +++$+++ 540711 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.193219100E09 +++$+++ yes, I think EA is right-- he gives the consultancy on his own web page.''' +++$+++ ::yes, I think EA is right-- he gives the consultancy on his own web page.'''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 02:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

16424 +++$+++ Gaura79 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16424 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-07 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.273294800E09 +++$+++ Why do you say that [[Post (South Africa)|this reference]] is unusable?-- +++$+++ Why do you say that [[Post (South Africa)|this reference]] is unusable?--[[User:Gaura79|Gaura79]] ([[User talk:Gaura79|talk]]) 22:00, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
16425 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16424 +++$+++ 16424 +++$+++ 2010-05-07 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.273295400E09 +++$+++ Where is the link the info cited - where the info exist? That is what is missing. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Where is the link the info cited - where the info exist? That is what is missing. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 22:10, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
16426 +++$+++ Gaura79 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16424 +++$+++ 16425 +++$+++ 2010-05-07 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.273297860E09 +++$+++ It's not possible to provide a direct link. But the articles are available on [[Gale database]] (that's where I found them). Just go and check it.-- +++$+++ :: It's not possible to provide a direct link. But the articles are available on [[Gale database]] (that's where I found them). Just go and check it.--[[User:Gaura79|Gaura79]] ([[User talk:Gaura79|talk]]) 22:51, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
16427 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16424 +++$+++ 16426 +++$+++ 2010-05-07 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.273298040E09 +++$+++ Where is the link where the info exist? That is what is missing. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::Where is the link where the info exist? That is what is missing. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 22:54, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
16428 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16424 +++$+++ 16424 +++$+++ 2010-05-07 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.273301760E09 +++$+++ '''Again''' You need links that work. Thanks.  +++$+++ *'''Again''' You need links that work. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 23:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
16429 +++$+++ Gaura79 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16424 +++$+++ 16428 +++$+++ 2010-05-08 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.273335960E09 +++$+++ Where is it mentioned? Couldn't find it [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|here]] or anywhere else.-- +++$+++ :: Where is it mentioned? Couldn't find it [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|here]] or anywhere else.--[[User:Gaura79|Gaura79]] ([[User talk:Gaura79|talk]]) 09:26, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
16430 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16424 +++$+++ 16429 +++$+++ 2010-05-08 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.273380240E09 +++$+++ That is my point. Your references have to not only be reliable, but verifiable as well. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::That is my point. Your references have to not only be reliable, but verifiable as well. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 21:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

540715 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540715 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-22 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.193107800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] 19:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
540716 +++$+++ Chriswaterguy +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540715 +++$+++ 540715 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.193110140E09 +++$+++ Was wondering if it that was the issue. The first one, obviously - details found at that link. Obviously not properly cited in that form. To point out the need for a correct citation would have been less work than deleting the article, and a lot more constructive. -- +++$+++ :Was wondering if it that was the issue. The first one, obviously - details found at that link. Obviously not properly cited in that form. To point out the need for a correct citation would have been less work than deleting the article, and a lot more constructive. --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] <small>[[User talk:Chriswaterguy|talk]]</small> 20:29, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

278572 +++$+++ Youngidealist +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278572 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-24 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.177455000E09 +++$+++ <s>Ok, so I guess I went and broke the rule by one revert then.<\/s> This edit war is a bizarre conflict in that the individuals who are fighting are removing valuable information without talking on it. It's been a hit and run process for them.I think it's fair to say that they are vandalizing the page, but I don't know who might agree. I will find the time later to make an RtC for it in hopes that the people who comment would have more integrity than they did.  I think that the guy without an account might have still been Skarioffszky too. Is there a chance that I could get the page semi-locked, since the other pages on the issue are also semi-locked? - +++$+++ <s>Ok, so I guess I went and broke the rule by one revert then.</s> This edit war is a bizarre conflict in that the individuals who are fighting are removing valuable information without talking on it. It's been a hit and run process for them.I think it's fair to say that they are vandalizing the page, but I don't know who might agree. I will find the time later to make an RtC for it in hopes that the people who comment would have more integrity than they did.  I think that the guy without an account might have still been Skarioffszky too. Is there a chance that I could get the page semi-locked, since the other pages on the issue are also semi-locked? -[[User:Youngidealist|Youngidealist]] 15:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
278573 +++$+++ Youngidealist +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278572 +++$+++ 278572 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.177455360E09 +++$+++ Actually, I just remembered that the last thing I did on the history was a simple edit for clarity, not a revert. I think I am still within the guidelines then, but yeah, it's still an edit war with those two.- +++$+++ :Actually, I just remembered that the last thing I did on the history was a simple edit for clarity, not a revert. I think I am still within the guidelines then, but yeah, it's still an edit war with those two.-[[User:Youngidealist|Youngidealist]] 15:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
278574 +++$+++ Youngidealist +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278572 +++$+++ 278573 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.177456260E09 +++$+++ Ok, That sounds good. Can I ask, would you know if NBC is connected to or possibly owned by Turner now? I ask for the sake of my own suspicians about the interpretations of thetapes (Turner bleeps out 'Jesus' when said in vein on its stations) but I wouldn't aempt to put it on the article, that ''would'' be origional research, I'm just curious. There is of course the need to clarify if he was speaking against Christians or speaking against the \"wrong kind of Christian\" which is often a stance that Christians take to criticize one another. I also wonder how you would feel about NBC if it does turn out to be a false rumor in the company. Thanks for your assistance - +++$+++ ::Ok, That sounds good. Can I ask, would you know if NBC is connected to or possibly owned by Turner now? I ask for the sake of my own suspicians about the interpretations of thetapes (Turner bleeps out 'Jesus' when said in vein on its stations) but I wouldn't aempt to put it on the article, that ''would'' be origional research, I'm just curious. There is of course the need to clarify if he was speaking against Christians or speaking against the "wrong kind of Christian" which is often a stance that Christians take to criticize one another. I also wonder how you would feel about NBC if it does turn out to be a false rumor in the company. Thanks for your assistance -[[User:Youngidealist|Youngidealist]] 16:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

469641 +++$+++ RaviC +++$+++ JGHowes +++$+++ 469641 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-21 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.271898720E09 +++$+++ The article currently does not convey the general attitudes towards the administrative power (i.e. [[United Kingdom|the UK]]), whereas other [[British Overseas Territories]], such as [[Gibraltar]], [[Turks and Caicos islands]] and the [[Falkland Islands]] mention what the attitudes in the territories are towards the [[UK]].  From your experience, how do the people in Bermuda feel about being classified as British?  Is there an article on this issue that we can cite?  Thanks. -- +++$+++ The article currently does not convey the general attitudes towards the administrative power (i.e. [[United Kingdom|the UK]]), whereas other [[British Overseas Territories]], such as [[Gibraltar]], [[Turks and Caicos islands]] and the [[Falkland Islands]] mention what the attitudes in the territories are towards the [[UK]].  From your experience, how do the people in Bermuda feel about being classified as British?  Is there an article on this issue that we can cite?  Thanks. --[[User:RaviC|RaviC]] ([[User talk:RaviC|talk]]) 18:12, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
469642 +++$+++ JGHowes +++$+++ JGHowes +++$+++ 469641 +++$+++ 469641 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.272050460E09 +++$+++ The government of Bermuda's ruling party, the PLP, is officially pro-independence and some people are vehemently anti-British. However, polls show that the majority of the population favours the status quo. When Queen Elizabeth visited Bermuda last November, Her Majesty was very warmly welcomed island-wide. ''[[The Royal Gazette]]'' has reported the poll results and the independence debate. <i><b><small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :The government of Bermuda's ruling party, the PLP, is officially pro-independence and some people are vehemently anti-British. However, polls show that the majority of the population favours the status quo. When Queen Elizabeth visited Bermuda last November, Her Majesty was very warmly welcomed island-wide. ''[[The Royal Gazette]]'' has reported the poll results and the independence debate. <i><b><small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:JGHowes|<font style="color:white;background:#008000;">&nbsp;JGHowes&nbsp; </font>]]</span></small><font color="blue"> <sup>[[User talk:JGHowes|''talk'']]</sup></font></b></i> 12:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
469643 +++$+++ Nbahn +++$+++ JGHowes +++$+++ 469641 +++$+++ 469641 +++$+++ 2010-05-07 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.273270800E09 +++$+++ '''Please be advised that planning  is now underway (see [[Wikipedia talk:Meetup\/DC 10|here]]) for [[Wikipedia:Meetup\/DC 10|DC Meetup #10]].'''  +++$+++ *'''Please be advised that planning  is now underway (see [[Wikipedia talk:Meetup/DC 10|here]]) for [[Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 10|DC Meetup #10]].''' [[User:Nbahn|--NBahn]] ([[User talk:Nbahn|talk]]) 15:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

16436 +++$+++ Nuujinn +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-20 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.274349540E09 +++$+++ You've referred twice to the talk page for this article in your edit summaries, but you haven't explained your actions, could you please clarify your intentions in regard to these significant alterations you are making? --<span style=\"text-shadow:#DDDDDD 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ You've referred twice to the talk page for this article in your edit summaries, but you haven't explained your actions, could you please clarify your intentions in regard to these significant alterations you are making? --<span style="text-shadow:#DDDDDD 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Nuujinn|Nuujinn]] ([[User talk:Nuujinn|talk]])</span> 02:59, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
16437 +++$+++ Alatari +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16436 +++$+++ 16436 +++$+++ 2010-05-21 08:15:00 +++$+++ 1.274454900E09 +++$+++ I believe an editor from another major world religion portal is a welcome sight to the mix of editors currently working on that page.  Diversity may lead to NPOV and a better consensus.  Thankyou for your attempts and I hope you can continue to bring your expertise to the article.  Besides, you are in for a deep experience in the area of building Wikipedia consensus.  The journey on that page so far has traveled through most every Wikipedia principle there is.   +++$+++ :I believe an editor from another major world religion portal is a welcome sight to the mix of editors currently working on that page.  Diversity may lead to NPOV and a better consensus.  Thankyou for your attempts and I hope you can continue to bring your expertise to the article.  Besides, you are in for a deep experience in the area of building Wikipedia consensus.  The journey on that page so far has traveled through most every Wikipedia principle there is.  [[User:Alatari|Alatari]] ([[User talk:Alatari|talk]]) 08:15, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

278582 +++$+++ Jjm10 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-22 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.179823920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Jjm10|Jjm10]] 01:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
278583 +++$+++ Phil Boswell +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278582 +++$+++ 278582 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.180011540E09 +++$+++ Leaving threatening messages on someone's talk-page is not cool, especially when you've actually managed to slip up yourself. You tagged that article with {{[[Template:db-repost|db-repost]]}} which is not valid in the absence of an actual deletion discussion. Maybe you could do with revising how [[wikipedia:speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] works to avoid another such situation; maybe you could also consider working with people to improve their articles rather than simply flogging them to death with templates. HTH HAND \u2014 +++$+++ : Leaving threatening messages on someone's talk-page is not cool, especially when you've actually managed to slip up yourself. You tagged that article with {{[[Template:db-repost|db-repost]]}} which is not valid in the absence of an actual deletion discussion. Maybe you could do with revising how [[wikipedia:speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] works to avoid another such situation; maybe you could also consider working with people to improve their articles rather than simply flogging them to death with templates. HTH HAND —[[User:Phil Boswell|Phil]] | [[User talk:Phil Boswell|Talk]] 05:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
278584 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278582 +++$+++ 278583 +++$+++ 2007-05-28 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.180382520E09 +++$+++ I agree with Phil here. I think you may have inadvertantly [[WP:BITE|bitten]] a newcomer. The last thing we want to do is turn an enthusiastic and well intentioned contributor into someone sour on our process who keeps their potential contributions to themselves because we've driven them away. The parkclearly exists, a google search reveals that, and it is clearly notable enough to merit inclusion. The article just needed some work, and instead of tagging, perhaps you could have worked with the user. I hope you find this feedback useful. Happy editing. ++ +++$+++ :: I agree with Phil here. I think you may have inadvertantly [[WP:BITE|bitten]] a newcomer. The last thing we want to do is turn an enthusiastic and well intentioned contributor into someone sour on our process who keeps their potential contributions to themselves because we've driven them away. The parkclearly exists, a google search reveals that, and it is clearly notable enough to merit inclusion. The article just needed some work, and instead of tagging, perhaps you could have worked with the user. I hope you find this feedback useful. Happy editing. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 13:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

540730 +++$+++ Schutz +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.193770320E09 +++$+++ Hi, why did you blank and protect this article ? I don't mind the protection (even though neither the history nor the discussion page give me any reason for the protection), but blanking is almost never the right thing to do \u2014 especially when the edit summary does not indicate why the blanking was performed ? Thanks !  +++$+++ Hi, why did you blank and protect this article ? I don't mind the protection (even though neither the history nor the discussion page give me any reason for the protection), but blanking is almost never the right thing to do — especially when the edit summary does not indicate why the blanking was performed ? Thanks ! [[User:Schutz|Schutz]] 11:52, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
540731 +++$+++ Schutz +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540730 +++$+++ 540730 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.193789160E09 +++$+++ Ah, ok. Thanks for the reply. Indeed, it did not occur to me that it could be a deleted\/recreated article. Explains everything. Having such a blank page come up in our list of short pages seemed strange. While I would like very much to see a tag or some text in the page instead of a blanking (basically, anything that adds at least 100 characters or so so that the page is not too short), I guess that this particular situation does not come up very often, so we can probably live with temporarily. Thanks for the reply,  +++$+++ :Ah, ok. Thanks for the reply. Indeed, it did not occur to me that it could be a deleted/recreated article. Explains everything. Having such a blank page come up in our list of short pages seemed strange. While I would like very much to see a tag or some text in the page instead of a blanking (basically, anything that adds at least 100 characters or so so that the page is not too short), I guess that this particular situation does not come up very often, so we can probably live with temporarily. Thanks for the reply, [[User:Schutz|Schutz]] 17:06, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
540732 +++$+++ Schutz +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540730 +++$+++ 540731 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.193795520E09 +++$+++ All good with me, no problem. Thanks for the detailed replies.  +++$+++ ::All good with me, no problem. Thanks for the detailed replies. [[User:Schutz|Schutz]] 18:52, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
540733 +++$+++ Schutz +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540730 +++$+++ 540732 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.193802660E09 +++$+++ Nope, I don't see any way of doing it, sorry.  +++$+++ :::Nope, I don't see any way of doing it, sorry. [[User:Schutz|Schutz]] 20:51, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

16444 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-06 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.304676120E09 +++$+++ Hi. I  realise that  you are quite a specialist on Asian religions, but in view of the complexities of the two articles involved, perhaps an attempt at dialogue with the other editors would have been more appropriate than reducing  one article to  a stub and sending  it  summarily  to  AfD. -- +++$+++ Hi. I  realise that  you are quite a specialist on Asian religions, but in view of the complexities of the two articles involved, perhaps an attempt at dialogue with the other editors would have been more appropriate than reducing  one article to  a stub and sending  it  summarily  to  AfD. --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 03:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
16445 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16444 +++$+++ 16444 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.304816520E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your comments, I appreciate them. If the other editors where not Anons, it would of been easier to hold a dialogue - but given there Anon status; I have no idea who I am talking to. Also, I must admit, I am a bit skeptical of Anons. Then again, you bring up a good point. Next time, I will attempt a more engaging dialogue as the starting point. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Thank you for your comments, I appreciate them. If the other editors where not Anons, it would of been easier to hold a dialogue - but given there Anon status; I have no idea who I am talking to. Also, I must admit, I am a bit skeptical of Anons. Then again, you bring up a good point. Next time, I will attempt a more engaging dialogue as the starting point. Thanks again. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 18:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

16446 +++$+++ NeilN +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-12 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.305191580E09 +++$+++ I don't know what your issue is with this organization and I don't particularly care. But [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Radha_Madhav_Dham&diff=428682922&oldid=428682307 this] is blatant [[WP:COATRACK|coatracking]]. You don't dump the contents of an article into another one. -- +++$+++ I don't know what your issue is with this organization and I don't particularly care. But [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radha_Madhav_Dham&diff=428682922&oldid=428682307 this] is blatant [[WP:COATRACK|coatracking]]. You don't dump the contents of an article into another one. --[[User:NeilN|'''<font color="#003F87">Neil<font color="#CD0000">N</font></font>''']] <sup><font face="Calibri">''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="#003F87">talk to me</font>]]''</font></sup> 02:13, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
16447 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16446 +++$+++ 16446 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.305191760E09 +++$+++ These were not \"dumped\" but removed by another Anon editor. Please do Not remove reliable sources that detail the history of subject. If you have opinions - please take them elsewhere. Thanks.  +++$+++ *These were not "dumped" but removed by another Anon editor. Please do Not remove reliable sources that detail the history of subject. If you have opinions - please take them elsewhere. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 02:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
16448 +++$+++ NeilN +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16446 +++$+++ 16447 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.305191880E09 +++$+++ Because the content now appears in another article. -- +++$+++ ::Because the content now appears in another article. --[[User:NeilN|'''<font color="#003F87">Neil<font color="#CD0000">N</font></font>''']] <sup><font face="Calibri">''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="#003F87">talk to me</font>]]''</font></sup> 02:18, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
16449 +++$+++ NeilN +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16446 +++$+++ 16447 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.305192060E09 +++$+++ The subject of the article is not [[Swami Prakashanand Saraswati]]. -- +++$+++ ::The subject of the article is not [[Swami Prakashanand Saraswati]]. --[[User:NeilN|'''<font color="#003F87">Neil<font color="#CD0000">N</font></font>''']] <sup><font face="Calibri">''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="#003F87">talk to me</font>]]''</font></sup> 02:21, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
16450 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16446 +++$+++ 16449 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.305192360E09 +++$+++ The appropriate place for this discussion is the talk page of the article. Anyhow, the history of the temple, and especially any history that is recorded by reliable sources, and is notable, should be included in the article. Also, please, let us continue this discussion on the talk page of the article. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::The appropriate place for this discussion is the talk page of the article. Anyhow, the history of the temple, and especially any history that is recorded by reliable sources, and is notable, should be included in the article. Also, please, let us continue this discussion on the talk page of the article. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 02:26, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
16451 +++$+++ NeilN +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16446 +++$+++ 16450 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.305192480E09 +++$+++ Are you sure you want a record of your extremely questionable edits on there? -- +++$+++ ::::Are you sure you want a record of your extremely questionable edits on there? --[[User:NeilN|'''<font color="#003F87">Neil<font color="#CD0000">N</font></font>''']] <sup><font face="Calibri">''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="#003F87">talk to me</font>]]''</font></sup> 02:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
16452 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16446 +++$+++ 16451 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.305192660E09 +++$+++ Please take these discussions to the article's talk page. You can vent your opinions there. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::::Please take these discussions to the article's talk page. You can vent your opinions there. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 02:31, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

308576 +++$+++ Richard001 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-10 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.207895700E09 +++$+++ I'm unwatching this article; I take it you'll be keeping an eye on it? I presume others are watching it to but want to make sure someone will be looking after it.  +++$+++ I'm unwatching this article; I take it you'll be keeping an eye on it? I presume others are watching it to but want to make sure someone will be looking after it. [[User:Richard001|Richard001]] ([[User talk:Richard001|talk]]) 23:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
308577 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308576 +++$+++ 308576 +++$+++ 2008-04-13 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.208146140E09 +++$+++ Ok, it's on my watchlist and I';; try to overcome my wikisloth enough to keep an eye on it. ..  +++$+++ :Ok, it's on my watchlist and I';; try to overcome my wikisloth enough to keep an eye on it. .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:09, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

278594 +++$+++ Mike Halterman +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278594 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-27 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.188219060E09 +++$+++ {{User:Mike Halterman\/WM2008Atlanta}}  +++$+++ {{User:Mike Halterman/WM2008Atlanta}} [[User:Mike Halterman|Mike H.]] [[User talk:Mike Halterman|I did "That's hot" first!]] 05:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
278595 +++$+++ Mike Halterman +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278594 +++$+++ 278594 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.188297480E09 +++$+++ Please respond soon, it is rather time-sensitive.  +++$+++ :Please respond soon, it is rather time-sensitive. [[User:Mike Halterman|Mike H.]] [[User talk:Mike Halterman|I did "That's hot" first!]] 03:38, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
278596 +++$+++ Mike Halterman +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278594 +++$+++ 278595 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.188305700E09 +++$+++ Of course. Anything you feel you can do. Please go to the bid and sign your name under \"in Atlanta\" and list your limitations so people know what to ask from you when the time comes.  +++$+++ ::Of course. Anything you feel you can do. Please go to the bid and sign your name under "in Atlanta" and list your limitations so people know what to ask from you when the time comes. [[User:Mike Halterman|Mike H.]] [[User talk:Mike Halterman|I did "That's hot" first!]] 05:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

540741 +++$+++ Emesee +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-03 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.194076080E09 +++$+++ [[Elevation (psychology)]] -- +++$+++ [[Elevation (psychology)]] --[[User:Emesee|Emesee]] 00:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
540742 +++$+++ Iridescent +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540741 +++$+++ 540741 +++$+++ 2007-11-03 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.194085620E09 +++$+++ I believe this is the ultra-shorthand version of \"How dare you delete my article?\" \u2014 [[User:Emesee|Emesee]] is the latest incarnation of {{user|Remi0o}}, the original creator. As with most of Remi's contribs, I think this one veers way over the [[WP:FRINGE]] precipice quite aside from being a pure dicdef, but I've offered to userify it if he's able to improve it.<font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"> \u2014   +++$+++ :I believe this is the ultra-shorthand version of "How dare you delete my article?" — [[User:Emesee|Emesee]] is the latest incarnation of {{user|Remi0o}}, the original creator. As with most of Remi's contribs, I think this one veers way over the [[WP:FRINGE]] precipice quite aside from being a pure dicdef, but I've offered to userify it if he's able to improve it.<font face="Trebuchet MS"> —  [[User:Iridescent|<font color="#E45E05">''iride''</font>]][[User_talk:Iridescent|<font color="#C1118C">''scent''</font>]]</font> 03:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

16454 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-12 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.305196620E09 +++$+++ I'm  not  going  to  issue a formal  warning  here or the mandatory  block  for edit warring. I  will however, offer some friendly  advice in  that  your editing  is now becoming  disruptive, and that your [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Radha Madhav Dham|AfD nomination]] and subsequent comments on  it  were shown to appear to  be possibly your own [[WP:POV|point  of view]].  Thanks. -- +++$+++ I'm  not  going  to  issue a formal  warning  here or the mandatory  block  for edit warring. I  will however, offer some friendly  advice in  that  your editing  is now becoming  disruptive, and that your [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radha Madhav Dham|AfD nomination]] and subsequent comments on  it  were shown to appear to  be possibly your own [[WP:POV|point  of view]].  Thanks. --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 03:37, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
16455 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16454 +++$+++ 16454 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.305196800E09 +++$+++ Please direct your comments to the talk page of [[Radha Madhav Dham]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Please direct your comments to the talk page of [[Radha Madhav Dham]]. Thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 03:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
16456 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16454 +++$+++ 16455 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.305197940E09 +++$+++ Editor behaviour issues are best addressed initially on the editor's talk page. Please don't  order others about  where they  should be seeking  or giving advice. Thanks. -- +++$+++ ::Editor behaviour issues are best addressed initially on the editor's talk page. Please don't  order others about  where they  should be seeking  or giving advice. Thanks. --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 03:59, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
16457 +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ Ism schism +++$+++ 16454 +++$+++ 16456 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.305198000E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks.  +++$+++ :::Okay, thanks. [[User:Ism schism|Ism schism]] ([[User talk:Ism schism#top|talk]]) 04:00, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

598830 +++$+++  +++$+++ Night Gyr +++$+++ 598830 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-25 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.182765060E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I,  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I, [[User:Sean William|Sean William]], award you this Current Events Barnstar for your excellent work rescuing the article on Jesse Davis from [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessie Davis|deletion]]. Keep up the good work! 02:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
598831 +++$+++ Sean William +++$+++ Night Gyr +++$+++ 598830 +++$+++ 598830 +++$+++ 2007-06-25 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.182765060E09 +++$+++ Cheers!  +++$+++ :Cheers! [[User:Sean William|Sean William]]  [[User talk:Sean William|@]] 02:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

16460 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.311634020E09 +++$+++ BTW, if you prefer I respond on my page just let me know. To answer you original question, I would say that it isn't necessary. If there is a prose section on the cast then I personally think that a list is just redundant. As for those other articles, at a glance they all look ok. I'm sure they need sprucing, but you have a good amount of info, because GA is for \"broad\" coverage and not \"comprehensive\". I would not that I didn't see sources for ''Gossip Girl'' for explaining where the titles of the episodes come from. Now, it's probably obvious that the titles are plays on those films, but if there isn't a reliable source saying that the title was intentionally drawn from those films then it's technically unsourced information.  +++$+++ BTW, if you prefer I respond on my page just let me know. To answer you original question, I would say that it isn't necessary. If there is a prose section on the cast then I personally think that a list is just redundant. As for those other articles, at a glance they all look ok. I'm sure they need sprucing, but you have a good amount of info, because GA is for "broad" coverage and not "comprehensive". I would not that I didn't see sources for ''Gossip Girl'' for explaining where the titles of the episodes come from. Now, it's probably obvious that the titles are plays on those films, but if there isn't a reliable source saying that the title was intentionally drawn from those films then it's technically unsourced information. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 15:47, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
16461 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16460 +++$+++ 16460 +++$+++ 2011-07-25 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311636600E09 +++$+++ Just go to [[WP:GAN]], and it has a step-by-step layout for how to nominate. Only nominate 1 or 2 at a time. Typically there is a long wait, but you never want 2 reviews going on at the same time because you don't want to stretch yourself thin trying to accommadate all of the reviewers comments.  +++$+++ :Just go to [[WP:GAN]], and it has a step-by-step layout for how to nominate. Only nominate 1 or 2 at a time. Typically there is a long wait, but you never want 2 reviews going on at the same time because you don't want to stretch yourself thin trying to accommadate all of the reviewers comments. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 16:30, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
16462 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16460 +++$+++ 16461 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311884640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the Barnstar Jay! I really appreciated it. :D  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the Barnstar Jay! I really appreciated it. :D [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 13:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
16463 +++$+++ Bignole +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16460 +++$+++ 16462 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.311887340E09 +++$+++ Yes, they always get reviewed, but I've had one wait almost 6 months because there is a huge backlog of GA nominations and only a handful of regular reviewers (anyone can review, so long as they did not actively edit the article, but most people don't).  +++$+++ :::Yes, they always get reviewed, but I've had one wait almost 6 months because there is a huge backlog of GA nominations and only a handful of regular reviewers (anyone can review, so long as they did not actively edit the article, but most people don't). [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:Maroon;color:Gold"> &nbsp;BIGNOLE&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 14:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

540750 +++$+++ Picaroon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540750 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.194431040E09 +++$+++ I object to your closure of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Starkey International Institute for Household Management]] as delete. One, what BLP concern? If you mean the sentence \"Some students, former Starkey employees, and several wealthy clients have criticized the program and its owner\", this was cited to Warner's article at the bottom. If you don't consider him a reliable source, just remove the offending reference and sentence. Deleting the whole article is an overreaction. Two, as to notability, the institute received significant coverage from multiple, reliable sources. How does it not pass notability? In addition to the sources cited, there is [http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/tol\/life_and_style\/article610820.ece this] article in ''[[The Times]]''. Three, where's the [[wikipedia:consensus|consensus]] to delete? That debate did not produce consensus of any sort. Please restore the article and send it to a proper afd.  +++$+++ I object to your closure of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starkey International Institute for Household Management]] as delete. One, what BLP concern? If you mean the sentence "Some students, former Starkey employees, and several wealthy clients have criticized the program and its owner", this was cited to Warner's article at the bottom. If you don't consider him a reliable source, just remove the offending reference and sentence. Deleting the whole article is an overreaction. Two, as to notability, the institute received significant coverage from multiple, reliable sources. How does it not pass notability? In addition to the sources cited, there is [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/article610820.ece this] article in ''[[The Times]]''. Three, where's the [[wikipedia:consensus|consensus]] to delete? That debate did not produce consensus of any sort. Please restore the article and send it to a proper afd. [[User:Picaroon|Picaroon]] [[User talk:Picaroon|(t)]] 02:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
540751 +++$+++ Picaroon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540750 +++$+++ 540750 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.194516600E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\/Log\/2007 November 8]]. If consensus determines I wrote an \"attack page\", I'll resign my adminship and leave the project. If your deletion is overturned, I'd appreciate an apology at the very least.  +++$+++ :Please see [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 November 8]]. If consensus determines I wrote an "attack page", I'll resign my adminship and leave the project. If your deletion is overturned, I'd appreciate an apology at the very least. [[User:Picaroon|Picaroon]] [[User talk:Picaroon|(t)]] 02:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

352269 +++$+++ Shiftchange +++$+++ Martyman +++$+++ 352269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-17 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.250505300E09 +++$+++ Is it possible for you to create a map of the [[Lake Eyre Basin]]? If you found time to do one like the map you did for the [[Murray-Darling Basin]] it would be gnarly. -  +++$+++ Is it possible for you to create a map of the [[Lake Eyre Basin]]? If you found time to do one like the map you did for the [[Murray-Darling Basin]] it would be gnarly. - [[User:Shiftchange|Shiftchange]] ([[User talk:Shiftchange|talk]]) 03:35, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
352270 +++$+++ Shiftchange +++$+++ Martyman +++$+++ 352269 +++$+++ 352269 +++$+++ 2010-03-05 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.267795020E09 +++$+++ No need, map has been created. -  +++$+++ :No need, map has been created. - [[User:Shiftchange|Shiftchange]] ([[User talk:Shiftchange|talk]]) 05:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

16464 +++$+++ Cvhcsee +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311669960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Cvhcsee|Cvhcsee]] ([[User talk:Cvhcsee|talk]]) 01:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
16465 +++$+++ Cvhcsee +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16464 +++$+++ 16464 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.311859080E09 +++$+++ I agree. I'll do as you say. And finish the job (episode list) that I sarted. I'm adding the prod. code of the episodes, adn putting in the order: viewers \/ airdate \/ code. Thank You.  +++$+++ :I agree. I'll do as you say. And finish the job (episode list) that I sarted. I'm adding the prod. code of the episodes, adn putting in the order: viewers / airdate / code. Thank You. [[User:Cvhcsee|Cvhcsee]] ([[User talk:Cvhcsee|talk]]) 06:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
16466 +++$+++ Cvhcsee +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16464 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.311904440E09 +++$+++ OK. But you could've done this by yourself. What I'm going to do now is put it in the order that you want. Hope you like it...  +++$+++ :::OK. But you could've done this by yourself. What I'm going to do now is put it in the order that you want. Hope you like it... [[User:Cvhcsee|Cvhcsee]] ([[User talk:Cvhcsee|talk]]) 18:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
16467 +++$+++ Cvhcsee +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16464 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.311907500E09 +++$+++ I did as you said, just like in [[Smallville (season 10)]]. No reason to revert now. Hope you like it.  +++$+++ ::::I did as you said, just like in [[Smallville (season 10)]]. No reason to revert now. Hope you like it. [[User:Cvhcsee|Cvhcsee]] ([[User talk:Cvhcsee|talk]]) 19:45, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

540755 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540755 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-08 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.194562680E09 +++$+++ Cheers!   +++$+++ Cheers!  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] 14:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
540756 +++$+++ A. B. +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540755 +++$+++ 540755 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.194573660E09 +++$+++ I hope this is helpful! --<font face=\"Futura\"> +++$+++ :I hope this is helpful! --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] [[User talk:A. B.|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] </font> 18:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

16469 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16469 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.311828120E09 +++$+++ Aww, thanks so Much Jamie! The recognition and support means a lot to me :) Well, just out of curiosity, which recent GA caught your attention? Well, I'm almost done \"We Belong Together\" (its massive lol) and almost done ''Charmbracelet'' (a 'duet' with another editor), and then the rest of the 'Mimi' singles (only like 2 left). I also want to do the Bio, which will be a big job, but necessary or else it will soon lost its star :( Then maybe ''E=MC2'' and its singles :)-- +++$+++ Aww, thanks so Much Jamie! The recognition and support means a lot to me :) Well, just out of curiosity, which recent GA caught your attention? Well, I'm almost done "We Belong Together" (its massive lol) and almost done ''Charmbracelet'' (a 'duet' with another editor), and then the rest of the 'Mimi' singles (only like 2 left). I also want to do the Bio, which will be a big job, but necessary or else it will soon lost its star :( Then maybe ''E=MC2'' and its singles :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  21:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
16470 +++$+++ Petergriffin9901 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16469 +++$+++ 16469 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311828660E09 +++$+++ Yes, originally I was going to only do her 90s work first, but then  got distracted and went for the newer stuff. I think I might go back to the old before ''E=MC2''. I only have 4 songs from the debut, 2 from ''Emotions'', 1 from ''Unplugged'', 2 from ''Music Box'', 1 from ''Daydream'', 2 from ''#1s'' and 1 from ''Rainbow''. Its really not so much left lol. Then got 3 tours, and the videos. Should be quick. Hopefully in around 2 months I can have her whole discography and fragrances done :)-- +++$+++ :Yes, originally I was going to only do her 90s work first, but then  got distracted and went for the newer stuff. I think I might go back to the old before ''E=MC2''. I only have 4 songs from the debut, 2 from ''Emotions'', 1 from ''Unplugged'', 2 from ''Music Box'', 1 from ''Daydream'', 2 from ''#1s'' and 1 from ''Rainbow''. Its really not so much left lol. Then got 3 tours, and the videos. Should be quick. Hopefully in around 2 months I can have her whole discography and fragrances done :)--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''CallMe'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Nathan'''''</font>]]  &bull; [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk2Me</font>]]  21:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

16471 +++$+++ Calvin999 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.311900480E09 +++$+++ As you are on the Wikiproject Mariah Carey, please write whether or not you think the current state of the article should keep or lose it's GA status [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:We_Belong_Together\/GA1 here]. Thanks.  +++$+++ As you are on the Wikiproject Mariah Carey, please write whether or not you think the current state of the article should keep or lose it's GA status [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:We_Belong_Together/GA1 here]. Thanks. [[User:Calvin999|<font color ="blue" face= "Aharoni">'''''Calvin '''''</font>]]&bull; [[User talk:Calvin999|<sup><font color="orange">9</font><font color="green">9</font><font color="red">9</font></sup>]]  17:48, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
16472 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16471 +++$+++ 16471 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.311900900E09 +++$+++ Done!  +++$+++ :Done! [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008#top|talk]]) 17:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
16473 +++$+++ Calvin999 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ 16471 +++$+++ 16472 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311997740E09 +++$+++ Thanks :)  +++$+++ :: Thanks :) [[User:Calvin999|<font color ="blue" face= "Aharoni">'''''Calvin '''''</font>]]&bull; [[User talk:Calvin999|<sup><font color="orange">9</font><font color="green">9</font><font color="red">9</font></sup>]]  20:49, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

540761 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-09 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.194681120E09 +++$+++ Hi - just a friendly note to let you know that England's geography stubs now have separate templates for each county (all in the form CountyName-geo-stub). If you're going to make any more like the three Lowick stubs it would save a little work further down the line if you used them rather than England-geo-stub. It's no big deal, but I thought I'd point it out if you didn't know about the by-county templates. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi - just a friendly note to let you know that England's geography stubs now have separate templates for each county (all in the form CountyName-geo-stub). If you're going to make any more like the three Lowick stubs it would save a little work further down the line if you used them rather than England-geo-stub. It's no big deal, but I thought I'd point it out if you didn't know about the by-county templates. Cheers, [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 23:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
540762 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540761 +++$+++ 540761 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.194682680E09 +++$+++ Ah, that makes sense :) Yeah, I must admit to having done the same myself with cut & paste before now. To answer your question, no, I've never heard of Northumberlandshire, and I'm pretty sure it's never used; \"-land\" has a roughly similar meaning to \"-shire\", so it would be redundant. The only three counties with an \"optional -shire\" would be Devon\/Devonshire, Dorset\/Dorsetshire and Somerset\/Somersetshire - and its archaic for the last two (it would be very rare to find either \"Dorsetshire\" or \"Somersetshire\" except in historical documents). A redirect for Devon at Devonshire-geo-stub might be useful, though.  +++$+++ :Ah, that makes sense :) Yeah, I must admit to having done the same myself with cut & paste before now. To answer your question, no, I've never heard of Northumberlandshire, and I'm pretty sure it's never used; "-land" has a roughly similar meaning to "-shire", so it would be redundant. The only three counties with an "optional -shire" would be Devon/Devonshire, Dorset/Dorsetshire and Somerset/Somersetshire - and its archaic for the last two (it would be very rare to find either "Dorsetshire" or "Somersetshire" except in historical documents). A redirect for Devon at Devonshire-geo-stub might be useful, though. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

278618 +++$+++ Mandsford +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.196933940E09 +++$+++ Retrieved from \"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Mandsford\" <<  +++$+++ Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mandsford" << [[User:Mandsford|Mandsford]] ([[User talk:Mandsford|talk]]) 01:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
278619 +++$+++ Mandsford +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278618 +++$+++ 278618 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.196940120E09 +++$+++ That's fine.  I wish I had more expertise on making tables.  I can do some of the basics, but all I have at the moment is the grist for the mill.  Anything you can offer to improve the appearance will be appreciated.  Right now, there's so much red and blue, it looks like election night.   +++$+++ *That's fine.  I wish I had more expertise on making tables.  I can do some of the basics, but all I have at the moment is the grist for the mill.  Anything you can offer to improve the appearance will be appreciated.  Right now, there's so much red and blue, it looks like election night.  [[User:Mandsford|Mandsford]] ([[User talk:Mandsford|talk]]) 03:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

16477 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-09 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.297262820E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Moondyne, for uploading the image of author [[Fergus Hume]]. I have added it to the article, '''''[[The Mystery of a Hansom Cab]]'''''. ;) Cheers, -- ''' +++$+++ Thank you, Moondyne, for uploading the image of author [[Fergus Hume]]. I have added it to the article, '''''[[The Mystery of a Hansom Cab]]'''''. ;) Cheers, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 06:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
16478 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16477 +++$+++ 16477 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.297266240E09 +++$+++ My pleasure.  &ndash; +++$+++ :My pleasure.  &ndash;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 07:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

540766 +++$+++ Mtmelendez +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-13 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.195016400E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I can't believe I missed those. - <span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 11pt\"> +++$+++ Thanks. I can't believe I missed those. - <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 11pt">[[User:Mtmelendez|Mtmelendez]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Mtmelendez|Talk]])</small></sup></span> 21:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
540767 +++$+++ Mtmelendez +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540766 +++$+++ 540766 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.195017180E09 +++$+++ Yep. I'm currently residing in [[Yauco]]. - <span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 11pt\"> +++$+++ :Yep. I'm currently residing in [[Yauco]]. - <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 11pt">[[User:Mtmelendez|Mtmelendez]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Mtmelendez|Talk]])</small></sup></span> 21:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

16479 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16479 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-16 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.297843440E09 +++$+++ }}  -- ''' +++$+++ }}  -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 00:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
16480 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16479 +++$+++ 16479 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.298203200E09 +++$+++ G'day Klavaza.  I trust that if you use parts of the article in your magazine you'll give attribution to Wikipedia.  It was written by  +++$+++ :G'day Klavaza.  I trust that if you use parts of the article in your magazine you'll give attribution to Wikipedia.  It was written by [[User:Hesperian]]. Seeing you asked nicely, I'll definitely try to get some hi-res photos for you, but can't promise anything quickly as its a bit out of my normal commute.  &ndash;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 04:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
16481 +++$+++ Dan arndt +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16479 +++$+++ 16480 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.298378820E09 +++$+++ Thought I spied SatSuro on Sunday, standing at the roundabout taking photos of the memorial - so I guess he's responding to this inquiry.  +++$+++ ::Thought I spied SatSuro on Sunday, standing at the roundabout taking photos of the memorial - so I guess he's responding to this inquiry. [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 04:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

278624 +++$+++ TerriersFan +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278624 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-25 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.198580340E09 +++$+++ Hi, I fully understand your delete recommendation at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Crispus Attucks Communication and Writing Magnet School]] because the page was in bad shape. However, it has now been rewritten with many references to establish compliance with [[WP:N]]. I wonder if you would be good enough to revisit your recommendation, please?  +++$+++ Hi, I fully understand your delete recommendation at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crispus Attucks Communication and Writing Magnet School]] because the page was in bad shape. However, it has now been rewritten with many references to establish compliance with [[WP:N]]. I wonder if you would be good enough to revisit your recommendation, please? [[User:TerriersFan|TerriersFan]] ([[User talk:TerriersFan|talk]]) 02:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
278625 +++$+++ TerriersFan +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278624 +++$+++ 278624 +++$+++ 2007-12-25 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.198584060E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for your reconsideration.  +++$+++ :Many thanks for your reconsideration. [[User:TerriersFan|TerriersFan]] ([[User talk:TerriersFan|talk]]) 04:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

16482 +++$+++ Harrias +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-20 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.298190000E09 +++$+++ I see from the talk page, and the list of contributors, that you've been pretty heavily involved in this page! I've had a bit of an attack on the page, with the target of getting it back to Featured List status, and I was hoping you could have a look over it for me. I've opened a peer review, in which I've stated some of the main (and more controversial changes), [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/List of Ashes series\/archive1]]. Regards, ''' +++$+++ I see from the talk page, and the list of contributors, that you've been pretty heavily involved in this page! I've had a bit of an attack on the page, with the target of getting it back to Featured List status, and I was hoping you could have a look over it for me. I've opened a peer review, in which I've stated some of the main (and more controversial changes), [[Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Ashes series/archive1]]. Regards, '''[[User:Harrias|<font color="#00cc33">Harrias</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<font color="#009900">talk</font>]]</sup> 00:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
16483 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16482 +++$+++ 16482 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.298202540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up and at first glance, good work! I'll drop a comment there in the next day or so after giving it some some thought.  &ndash; +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up and at first glance, good work! I'll drop a comment there in the next day or so after giving it some some thought.  &ndash;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 03:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
16484 +++$+++ Harrias +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16482 +++$+++ 16483 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.299214560E09 +++$+++ Replied to your comments, and made tweaks after other comments: might you be able to have another look? ''' +++$+++ ::Replied to your comments, and made tweaks after other comments: might you be able to have another look? '''[[User:Harrias|<font color="#00cc33">Harrias</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<font color="#009900">talk</font>]]</sup> 20:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
16485 +++$+++ Harrias +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16482 +++$+++ 16483 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.301450640E09 +++$+++ To let you know, I've now nominated this for FL, should you wish to make any comments, you can find it: [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/List of Ashes series\/archive2]] ''' +++$+++ ::To let you know, I've now nominated this for FL, should you wish to make any comments, you can find it: [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Ashes series/archive2]] '''[[User:Harrias|<font color="#00cc33">Harrias</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<font color="#009900">talk</font>]]</sup> 19:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

278627 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278627 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-26 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.198663860E09 +++$+++ Hello, I noticed you spam warned this user for edits to [[Karen Maron]]. I removed the blog references, but I'm not sure I see the spam. At any rate, he seems to have stopped now. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hello, I noticed you spam warned this user for edits to [[Karen Maron]]. I removed the blog references, but I'm not sure I see the spam. At any rate, he seems to have stopped now. Thanks, [[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500">  Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 02:11, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
278628 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278627 +++$+++ 278627 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.198664400E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADlohcierekim&diff=180183875&oldid=179961754 Thanks for your note.] I've left him a message requesting English sources. Cheers,  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADlohcierekim&diff=180183875&oldid=179961754 Thanks for your note.] I've left him a message requesting English sources. Cheers, [[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500">  Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 02:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

278629 +++$+++ Smkolins +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278629 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-26 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.198702860E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Smkolins|Smkolins]] ([[User talk:Smkolins|talk]]) 13:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
278630 +++$+++ Smkolins +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278629 +++$+++ 278629 +++$+++ 2007-12-26 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.198703220E09 +++$+++ Additionally [[Wikipedia:Notability (schools)]] states \"At present schools do not have agreed guidelines. This is because several attempts at producing a schools policy have failed.\" Please note I'm not a member of any prior discussions on what is notable or not about schools. This article presents several specifics which I agree generally are worthwhile but ends \"A school article that fails to establish notability will not be deleted, if the school can be confirmed to exist.[2] It would be simply redirected to the appropriate article for the relevant locality or school district (US and Canada only). Thus the article could be later expanded back out into its own article again when sources should become available.[3]\" +++$+++ : Additionally [[Wikipedia:Notability (schools)]] states "At present schools do not have agreed guidelines. This is because several attempts at producing a schools policy have failed." Please note I'm not a member of any prior discussions on what is notable or not about schools. This article presents several specifics which I agree generally are worthwhile but ends "A school article that fails to establish notability will not be deleted, if the school can be confirmed to exist.[2] It would be simply redirected to the appropriate article for the relevant locality or school district (US and Canada only). Thus the article could be later expanded back out into its own article again when sources should become available.[3]"[[User:Smkolins|Smkolins]] ([[User talk:Smkolins|talk]]) 13:07, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

16486 +++$+++ Dan arndt +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-22 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.298378820E09 +++$+++ Am heading down to Busselton for a week of competitive sailing, will try and stop along the way and take some photos of the public artworks in Mandurah and Bunbury. Keen to get a pic of 'The Water Dance' on Forrest Highway and 'The Navigators' in Bunbury.  +++$+++ Am heading down to Busselton for a week of competitive sailing, will try and stop along the way and take some photos of the public artworks in Mandurah and Bunbury. Keen to get a pic of 'The Water Dance' on Forrest Highway and 'The Navigators' in Bunbury. [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 04:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
16487 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16486 +++$+++ 16486 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.298381580E09 +++$+++ Lucky you.  I'm doing Kojonup and Katanning tomorrow but reckon Busso will be heaps more exciting ;(  If you do have extra time at Mandurah, there's a lot more[http:\/\/www.mandurah.wa.gov.au\/HBItem_54614.PDF] that can be added to the list but I was holding off until I got photos.  &ndash; +++$+++ :Lucky you.  I'm doing Kojonup and Katanning tomorrow but reckon Busso will be heaps more exciting ;(  If you do have extra time at Mandurah, there's a lot more[http://www.mandurah.wa.gov.au/HBItem_54614.PDF] that can be added to the list but I was holding off until I got photos.  &ndash;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 05:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
16488 +++$+++ Dan arndt +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16486 +++$+++ 16487 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.298394720E09 +++$+++ Might have to leave earlier than I previously anticipated - good thing I know where a lot of these ones are, so locating them shouldn't be a problem - though will only do the more substantial public art works rather than the smaller mosiacs etc. What's your thoughts on the War Memorial? Is it public art or not?  +++$+++ ::Might have to leave earlier than I previously anticipated - good thing I know where a lot of these ones are, so locating them shouldn't be a problem - though will only do the more substantial public art works rather than the smaller mosiacs etc. What's your thoughts on the War Memorial? Is it public art or not? [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 09:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
16489 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16486 +++$+++ 16488 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.298560020E09 +++$+++ Whatever you reckon.  The more the merrier.  &ndash; +++$+++ :::Whatever you reckon.  The more the merrier.  &ndash;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 07:07, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

546544 +++$+++ Silver00 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-01 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.225596120E09 +++$+++ Thanks CactusWriter for your help, actually I want to write an article on Zohra Sarwari she is a muslim motivational youth speaker as well as author of a book. I have made many attempts but my article gets deleted every time and thats toooooooooo frustrating. But when people like you and Marasmusin are there newbies like me will not go crazy :) Hope I get the article included in wikipedia. Actually the tutorials are difficult or there is to much material that a person gets lost thats why may be I missed things even after reading. No easy step-by-step tutorial available. too confusing-- +++$+++ Thanks CactusWriter for your help, actually I want to write an article on Zohra Sarwari she is a muslim motivational youth speaker as well as author of a book. I have made many attempts but my article gets deleted every time and thats toooooooooo frustrating. But when people like you and Marasmusin are there newbies like me will not go crazy :) Hope I get the article included in wikipedia. Actually the tutorials are difficult or there is to much material that a person gets lost thats why may be I missed things even after reading. No easy step-by-step tutorial available. too confusing--[[User:Silver00|Silver00]] ([[User talk:Silver00|talk]]) 20:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
546545 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546544 +++$+++ 546544 +++$+++ 2008-11-01 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.225598160E09 +++$+++ However, I expect there are other biographies or topics in which you have an interest that you can help to create or edit. There is a lot going on here -- and it can seem complicated, at first -- but no one expects anyone to know it all from the start. Don't worry, you will get the hang of it. Perhaps start by reading articles and making corrections where you find them. You can also find existing article stubs (tiny articles that have only been begun and need expansion) and help to expand them. Tell me, which topics, people, professions, etc. are you interested in or have studied or are studying? I can probably point you toward a group of articles which are in need of help. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :However, I expect there are other biographies or topics in which you have an interest that you can help to create or edit. There is a lot going on here -- and it can seem complicated, at first -- but no one expects anyone to know it all from the start. Don't worry, you will get the hang of it. Perhaps start by reading articles and making corrections where you find them. You can also find existing article stubs (tiny articles that have only been begun and need expansion) and help to expand them. Tell me, which topics, people, professions, etc. are you interested in or have studied or are studying? I can probably point you toward a group of articles which are in need of help. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 20:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
546546 +++$+++ Silver00 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546544 +++$+++ 546545 +++$+++ 2008-11-01 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.225601820E09 +++$+++ No she is great speaker and she had been interviewed too. I am interested in homeopathy a kind of alternative medicine or complementary medicine system.-- +++$+++ ::No she is great speaker and she had been interviewed too. I am interested in homeopathy a kind of alternative medicine or complementary medicine system.--[[User:Silver00|Silver00]] ([[User talk:Silver00|talk]]) 21:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

16490 +++$+++  +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Have uploaded an image of 'The Water Dance' to commons - will put the rest of my photos up when I get back from Tasmania. 03:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ Have uploaded an image of 'The Water Dance' to commons - will put the rest of my photos up when I get back from Tasmania. 03:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
16491 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16490 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.299667080E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Water Dance.JPG|Found]], thanks.   +++$+++ ::[[:File:Water Dance.JPG|Found]], thanks.  [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 02:38, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

570727 +++$+++ Alex Bakharev +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-06 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.149610200E09 +++$+++ Regarding your valuable input to my talk page, do you have any particular page in mind or is it just general thoughts?  +++$+++ Regarding your valuable input to my talk page, do you have any particular page in mind or is it just general thoughts? [[User:Alex Bakharev|abakharev]] 09:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
570728 +++$+++ Alex Bakharev +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570727 +++$+++ 570727 +++$+++ 2006-06-06 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.149611400E09 +++$+++ I have noticed that you posted an identical message to the talk pages of many people. Please avoid this as it may be considered [[spam]]. Instead in future please post your valuable observations to [[WP:VPP]] or [[WP:AN]] or similar page.  +++$+++ *I have noticed that you posted an identical message to the talk pages of many people. Please avoid this as it may be considered [[spam]]. Instead in future please post your valuable observations to [[WP:VPP]] or [[WP:AN]] or similar page. [[User:Alex Bakharev|abakharev]] 09:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
570729 +++$+++ Alabamaboy +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570727 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-06 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.149624900E09 +++$+++ I agree with the above comments. If you have an issue with any action I have taken as an administrator, feel free to raise it with me. Otherwise, though, spam is not appreciated. Best,-- +++$+++ :::I agree with the above comments. If you have an issue with any action I have taken as an administrator, feel free to raise it with me. Otherwise, though, spam is not appreciated. Best,--[[User:Alabamaboy|Alabamaboy]] 13:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
570730 +++$+++ Alex S +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570727 +++$+++ 570727 +++$+++ 2006-06-06 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.149644160E09 +++$+++ I'd presume that your comments are based on your experiences editing the [[Tomorrow series]]. Although it's clear why you're frustrated, please understand that the administrators involved do not mean to be rude in any way. Feel free to ask them to explain to you why they made the edits they did: compromise and discussion is at the heart of creating quality, NPOV Wikipedia articles. In the meantime, in case you haven't already read it, check out [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]], which might give you a better idea of why the dispute arose on the Tomorrow series. In the meantime, happy editing, and enjoy Wikipedia! -- +++$+++ *I'd presume that your comments are based on your experiences editing the [[Tomorrow series]]. Although it's clear why you're frustrated, please understand that the administrators involved do not mean to be rude in any way. Feel free to ask them to explain to you why they made the edits they did: compromise and discussion is at the heart of creating quality, NPOV Wikipedia articles. In the meantime, in case you haven't already read it, check out [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]], which might give you a better idea of why the dispute arose on the Tomorrow series. In the meantime, happy editing, and enjoy Wikipedia! --[[User:Alex S|Alex S]] 18:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

16492 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-25 09:17:00 +++$+++ 1.301069820E09 +++$+++ Format - dont like current - links\/refs  and bolding in summary at top - would feel it would look better with refs in the sections below and no bolding - whatcha think?  +++$+++ Format - dont like current - links/refs  and bolding in summary at top - would feel it would look better with refs in the sections below and no bolding - whatcha think? [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 09:17, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
16493 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16492 +++$+++ 16492 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.301085960E09 +++$+++ I unbolded but not sure what you mean re refs.  Change it around if you wish.  +++$+++ :I unbolded but not sure what you mean re refs.  Change it around if you wish. [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 13:46, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
16494 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16492 +++$+++ 16493 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.301086740E09 +++$+++ Nah I thought the refs should be in the heading sections - not in the lead para so to speak - as it looks very eccentric at the mo - but hey its probably how it pans out over additions - as to whether the heading sections remain unreferenced and the lead para does get the refs - it looks topsy turvy - maybe some extra stuff will balance it out - but hey its too hot to think about - why east coast rain and cool and we still hot? bah  +++$+++ ::Nah I thought the refs should be in the heading sections - not in the lead para so to speak - as it looks very eccentric at the mo - but hey its probably how it pans out over additions - as to whether the heading sections remain unreferenced and the lead para does get the refs - it looks topsy turvy - maybe some extra stuff will balance it out - but hey its too hot to think about - why east coast rain and cool and we still hot? bah [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 13:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

540784 +++$+++ Mallerd +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-21 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.195661100E09 +++$+++ You say it's vanity, but how is it vanity when you look for [http:\/\/www.discogs.com\/artist\/Meagashira him here?]. I ensure you I am not Eugene van Brakel. The fact that you do not know a dj doesn't alway mean it is an article out of vanity. I'm not asking for a revert though. Just would like to make clear to you that you shouldn't be to quick with your judgment.  +++$+++ You say it's vanity, but how is it vanity when you look for [http://www.discogs.com/artist/Meagashira him here?]. I ensure you I am not Eugene van Brakel. The fact that you do not know a dj doesn't alway mean it is an article out of vanity. I'm not asking for a revert though. Just would like to make clear to you that you shouldn't be to quick with your judgment. [[User:Mallerd|Mallerd]] ([[User talk:Mallerd|talk]]) 08:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
540785 +++$+++ Mallerd +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540784 +++$+++ 540784 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.195702980E09 +++$+++ Those other WP:x are not criteria, mere suggestions\/degrees of notability. So I don't really see what your problem was, but still: nevermind.  +++$+++ :Those other WP:x are not criteria, mere suggestions/degrees of notability. So I don't really see what your problem was, but still: nevermind. [[User:Mallerd|Mallerd]] ([[User talk:Mallerd|talk]]) 19:43, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

16497 +++$+++ Skier Dude2 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-12 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.302612240E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of \"file\" pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Skier Dude2|Skier Dude2]] ([[User talk:Skier Dude2|talk]]) 05:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
16498 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16497 +++$+++ 16497 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.302612960E09 +++$+++ {{fixed}}. Apparently orphaned by mistake.   +++$+++ :{{fixed}}. Apparently orphaned by mistake.  [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 05:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

16499 +++$+++ δ +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-12 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.302621120E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/Moondyne|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|request for undeletion]] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/Moondyne|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|request for undeletion]] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> [[User talk:Δ|ΔT <sub><sup><font color="darkred">The only constant</font></sup></sub>]] 08:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
16500 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16499 +++$+++ 16499 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.302643920E09 +++$+++ {{fixed}}  +++$+++ :{{fixed}} [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 14:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

540788 +++$+++ Omghgomg +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-22 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.195741740E09 +++$+++ Please explain on my talk page. Thanks. <font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ Please explain on my talk page. Thanks. <font color="red">[[User:Omghgomg|σмgн]]</font><font color="black">[[User talk:Omghgomg|gσмg]]</font> 06:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
540789 +++$+++ Omghgomg +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540788 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-23 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.195826160E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks for the reason. I still have lots to learn. <font color=\"red\"> +++$+++ ::Ok, thanks for the reason. I still have lots to learn. <font color="red">[[User:Omghgomg|σмgн]]</font><font color="black">[[User talk:Omghgomg|gσмg]]</font> 05:56, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

16502 +++$+++ Danjel +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-17 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.303074960E09 +++$+++ You good mate? [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Moondyne&diff=424521720&oldid=420091091]] -''<font face=\"Tahoma\"> +++$+++ You good mate? [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Moondyne&diff=424521720&oldid=420091091]] -''<font face="Tahoma">[[User:Danjel|danjel]]</font>'' ([[User_talk:Danjel|talk to me]]) 14:16, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
16503 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16502 +++$+++ 16502 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.303111260E09 +++$+++ Thanks mate, I'm better now.   +++$+++ :Thanks mate, I'm better now.  [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 00:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

540792 +++$+++ Lquilter +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-29 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.196340600E09 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46, I wanted to just say that although I vehemently disagree with your analysis of [[WP:CATGRS]]-related issues, it's not personal; on other cat issues you seem to make sense. There's no ill-will on my side & hopefully not on yours. Cheers,  +++$+++ Carlossuarez46, I wanted to just say that although I vehemently disagree with your analysis of [[WP:CATGRS]]-related issues, it's not personal; on other cat issues you seem to make sense. There's no ill-will on my side & hopefully not on yours. Cheers, [[User:Lquilter|Lquilter]] ([[User talk:Lquilter|talk]]) 04:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
540793 +++$+++ Lquilter +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540792 +++$+++ 540792 +++$+++ 2007-11-29 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.196404680E09 +++$+++ responded back at [[User talk:Lquilter|my page]]. -- +++$+++ * responded back at [[User talk:Lquilter|my page]]. --[[User:Lquilter|Lquilter]] ([[User talk:Lquilter|talk]]) 22:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

16506 +++$+++ Macrakis +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16506 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-02 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.304331180E09 +++$+++ In the US the term \"prime lamb\" is not used to mean \"lamb bred for meat\", but rather top-quality lamb according to the inpectional services of the USDA.[http:\/\/www.fsis.usda.gov\/factsheets\/inspection_&_grading\/index.asp]  Lamb graded 'prime' may well come from stock bred specifically for meat, but that is not the definition.  Hope this clarifies things. -- +++$+++ In the US the term "prime lamb" is not used to mean "lamb bred for meat", but rather top-quality lamb according to the inpectional services of the USDA.[http://www.fsis.usda.gov/factsheets/inspection_&_grading/index.asp]  Lamb graded 'prime' may well come from stock bred specifically for meat, but that is not the definition.  Hope this clarifies things. --[[User:Macrakis|Macrakis]] ([[User talk:Macrakis|talk]]) 03:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
16507 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16506 +++$+++ 16506 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.304331900E09 +++$+++ You're making an unnecessary and false distinction.  viz: The cite you give is from the '''Food''' Safety and Inspection Service.  \"Prime lamb\" refers specifically to lambs used for meat.   +++$+++ :You're making an unnecessary and false distinction.  viz: The cite you give is from the '''Food''' Safety and Inspection Service.  "Prime lamb" refers specifically to lambs used for meat.  [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 03:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
16508 +++$+++ Macrakis +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16506 +++$+++ 16507 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.304368560E09 +++$+++ On the other hand, I haven't seen any evidence that the term 'prime lamb' is used in the sense \"lamb bred for meat\" in the US, but that appears to be the usage in the UK, Aus, and NZ.  Any additional info you have on the terminology would be great.  Thanks, -- +++$+++ ::On the other hand, I haven't seen any evidence that the term 'prime lamb' is used in the sense "lamb bred for meat" in the US, but that appears to be the usage in the UK, Aus, and NZ.  Any additional info you have on the terminology would be great.  Thanks, --[[User:Macrakis|Macrakis]] ([[User talk:Macrakis|talk]]) 13:36, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
16509 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16506 +++$+++ 16508 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.304370240E09 +++$+++ OK, I think we're in agreement now and I initially got my wires crossed as to what your point was.  My bad.  In AU, the 'prime lamb industry' relates to the farming practice of raising lambs for slaughter and consumption as meat.[http:\/\/www.abare.gov.au\/publications_html\/livestock\/livestock_00\/lamb.pdf].  In the US, it describes the meat.[http:\/\/www.fsis.usda.gov\/factsheets\/inspection_&_grading\/index.asp].  That is a slight oversimplification as the term is also used here occasionally for the meat, but not widely.   +++$+++ :::OK, I think we're in agreement now and I initially got my wires crossed as to what your point was.  My bad.  In AU, the 'prime lamb industry' relates to the farming practice of raising lambs for slaughter and consumption as meat.[http://www.abare.gov.au/publications_html/livestock/livestock_00/lamb.pdf].  In the US, it describes the meat.[http://www.fsis.usda.gov/factsheets/inspection_&_grading/index.asp].  That is a slight oversimplification as the term is also used here occasionally for the meat, but not widely.  [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 14:04, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

278651 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278651 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-07 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.202440560E09 +++$+++ That article is three pains and a half these days.  I'm ''hoping'' that discussions can be curtailed when they're just provocative and unproductive, but I'm too young for ulcers, so I can only take it so far.  Not taking the bait can be hard sometimes, which is why I've been blanking a lot of the really bad stuff that's useless anyhow.  It's probably some premature to think I've done much worthwhile yet, though.  +++$+++ That article is three pains and a half these days.  I'm ''hoping'' that discussions can be curtailed when they're just provocative and unproductive, but I'm too young for ulcers, so I can only take it so far.  Not taking the bait can be hard sometimes, which is why I've been blanking a lot of the really bad stuff that's useless anyhow.  It's probably some premature to think I've done much worthwhile yet, though. [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 19:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
278652 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278651 +++$+++ 278651 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.202502480E09 +++$+++ Blocking IPs that aren't actively editing is rarely worthwhile.  Block\/ban evasions typically at a minimum reset the block\/ban, but if someone's jumping around IPs, there's little value in blocking their old IP they're unlikely to use again.  +++$+++ :Blocking IPs that aren't actively editing is rarely worthwhile.  Block/ban evasions typically at a minimum reset the block/ban, but if someone's jumping around IPs, there's little value in blocking their old IP they're unlikely to use again. [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 12:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

278653 +++$+++ RingtailedFox +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-10 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.202706240E09 +++$+++ My edits are not vandalism, please do not label them as such. Further, i was not the one that mis-spelled the newscast member's name, and I did not add [[Game Show Network]] to WKYC-TV's affiliations. It was there before i made my edits. I'm unsure if WKYC even airs GSN. <span style=\"border:1px solid #330000;padding:2px;background-color:#C0C0C0;color:#000000;\">''' +++$+++ My edits are not vandalism, please do not label them as such. Further, i was not the one that mis-spelled the newscast member's name, and I did not add [[Game Show Network]] to WKYC-TV's affiliations. It was there before i made my edits. I'm unsure if WKYC even airs GSN. <span style="border:1px solid #330000;padding:2px;background-color:#C0C0C0;color:#000000;">'''[[User:RingtailedFox|RingtailedFox]] • [[User_talk:RingtailedFox|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/RingtailedFox|Contribs]]'''</span> 21:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
278654 +++$+++ RingtailedFox +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278653 +++$+++ 278653 +++$+++ 2008-02-10 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.202707920E09 +++$+++ Ahh! i see! it's ok. actually, i'll keep an eye out for that user and remind him to cite his sources before adding GSN to the digital subchannels of stations. <span style=\"border:1px solid #330000;padding:2px;background-color:#C0C0C0;color:#000000;\">''' +++$+++ :Ahh! i see! it's ok. actually, i'll keep an eye out for that user and remind him to cite his sources before adding GSN to the digital subchannels of stations. <span style="border:1px solid #330000;padding:2px;background-color:#C0C0C0;color:#000000;">'''[[User:RingtailedFox|RingtailedFox]] • [[User_talk:RingtailedFox|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/RingtailedFox|Contribs]]'''</span> 21:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

16510 +++$+++ Mtking +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-02 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.304331780E09 +++$+++ I have undone your edit to [[Wikipedia:Notability (sports)]] as it appears to be substantive and without obvious discussion on the [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)|talk]] page to obtain consensus. I am making no judgement as to the actual edit, just that the notice at the top of the page is very clear about the need to obtain a consensus prior to any substantive change.  +++$+++ I have undone your edit to [[Wikipedia:Notability (sports)]] as it appears to be substantive and without obvious discussion on the [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)|talk]] page to obtain consensus. I am making no judgement as to the actual edit, just that the notice at the top of the page is very clear about the need to obtain a consensus prior to any substantive change. [[User:Mtking|Mtking]] ([[User talk:Mtking|talk]]) 03:23, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
16511 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16510 +++$+++ 16510 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.304332440E09 +++$+++ I also make no judgement, but the change was to bring the page in line with the parrallel guideline at [[WP:CRIN]] which was developed aftre lengthy discussion and consensus from participants at the Cricket project and has been stable and inplace for some time.  and I ask you therefore to revert your revert.  I apologise for not being clearer in my edit summary that that was what I was doing.   +++$+++ :I also make no judgement, but the change was to bring the page in line with the parrallel guideline at [[WP:CRIN]] which was developed aftre lengthy discussion and consensus from participants at the Cricket project and has been stable and inplace for some time.  and I ask you therefore to revert your revert.  I apologise for not being clearer in my edit summary that that was what I was doing.  [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 03:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
16512 +++$+++ Mtking +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16510 +++$+++ 16511 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.304332620E09 +++$+++ edit conflict : May I suggest that you post to the [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)|talk]] page exactly that, leave it for a few days and then if there there are no major objections you can then make the change again, there is after all no rush is there?  +++$+++ :: edit conflict : May I suggest that you post to the [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)|talk]] page exactly that, leave it for a few days and then if there there are no major objections you can then make the change again, there is after all no rush is there? [[User:Mtking|Mtking]] ([[User talk:Mtking|talk]]) 03:37, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
16513 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16510 +++$+++ 16512 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.304332980E09 +++$+++ Happy to do so.  One other point FYI:  A previous version [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Notability_%28sports%29&oldid=367357715] was a copy paste from [[WP:CRIN]] as it was at that time.  The latter was subsequently updated but [[WP:NSPORTS]] wasn't.   +++$+++ :::Happy to do so.  One other point FYI:  A previous version [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Notability_%28sports%29&oldid=367357715] was a copy paste from [[WP:CRIN]] as it was at that time.  The latter was subsequently updated but [[WP:NSPORTS]] wasn't.  [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 03:43, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

221205 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-14 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.203024660E09 +++$+++ One thing he may have a slight point on though, I was tempted to remove it straight away as it's dubious. The \"playing cards\" and explosives - that's to do with a [[Griess test]] not a [[paraffin test]]. From what I know only the latter was done on the BS victims not the forner, was this brought up at Saville at all do you know? I'm thinking this might have been slipped in under the radar, when it's never been mentioned in relation to Bloody Sunday that I'm aware. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ One thing he may have a slight point on though, I was tempted to remove it straight away as it's dubious. The "playing cards" and explosives - that's to do with a [[Griess test]] not a [[paraffin test]]. From what I know only the latter was done on the BS victims not the forner, was this brought up at Saville at all do you know? I'm thinking this might have been slipped in under the radar, when it's never been mentioned in relation to Bloody Sunday that I'm aware. <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">303</span>]]''</sub></font> 13:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
221206 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221205 +++$+++ 221205 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.203025260E09 +++$+++ Paragraph 65 of Widgery refers to, \"The clothing of 11 of the deceased when examined for explosive residues showed no trace of gelignite,\" while Paragraph 66 states, \"The only other relevant forensic test applied to the deceased was the so-called paraffin test.\" I think we can reasonably infer that the first does refer to Greiss tests, but as I pointed out [[Talk:Bloody_Sunday_%281972%29#Greiss_Tests|previously]], they were all negative, so claims about false positives are redundant. I guess the playing cards think drifted in at some later point, but it does need removing.  +++$+++ :Paragraph 65 of Widgery refers to, "The clothing of 11 of the deceased when examined for explosive residues showed no trace of gelignite," while Paragraph 66 states, "The only other relevant forensic test applied to the deceased was the so-called paraffin test." I think we can reasonably infer that the first does refer to Greiss tests, but as I pointed out [[Talk:Bloody_Sunday_%281972%29#Greiss_Tests|previously]], they were all negative, so claims about false positives are redundant. I guess the playing cards think drifted in at some later point, but it does need removing. [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper#top|talk]]) 13:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
221207 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221205 +++$+++ 221206 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.203025560E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'll crack on with that now then. It's very frustrating when you ask exactly where a claim has come from and you get [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ABloody_Sunday_%281972%29&diff=191388816&oldid=191388624 this], like it's really easy to track down a statement of unknown wording from an unknown person in the second inquiry. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks. I'll crack on with that now then. It's very frustrating when you ask exactly where a claim has come from and you get [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABloody_Sunday_%281972%29&diff=191388816&oldid=191388624 this], like it's really easy to track down a statement of unknown wording from an unknown person in the second inquiry. <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">303</span>]]''</sub></font> 13:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
221208 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221205 +++$+++ 221207 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.203026040E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I know. Anyway, I'm currently hacking together what I hope with be an undisputed narrative of events, which should make the page a lot more clear. Incidentally, the bodies being manhandled by the soldiers is certainly covered in the ''Secret history'' documentary, so you can cite to that in the interim.  +++$+++ :::Yeah, I know. Anyway, I'm currently hacking together what I hope with be an undisputed narrative of events, which should make the page a lot more clear. Incidentally, the bodies being manhandled by the soldiers is certainly covered in the ''Secret history'' documentary, so you can cite to that in the interim. [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper#top|talk]]) 13:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
221209 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221205 +++$+++ 221208 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.203026640E09 +++$+++ The narrative would be good, certainly for the initial part of what happened. There's too many confused people, and currently the article doesn't make it clear. For example the Daly\/revolver part neglects to mention this was after the shooting had started. Otherwise you end up with the current situation of \"there are witnesses who saw people with guns\" who neglect to mention exactly ''when'' these people were seen. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::The narrative would be good, certainly for the initial part of what happened. There's too many confused people, and currently the article doesn't make it clear. For example the Daly/revolver part neglects to mention this was after the shooting had started. Otherwise you end up with the current situation of "there are witnesses who saw people with guns" who neglect to mention exactly ''when'' these people were seen. <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">303</span>]]''</sub></font> 14:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
221210 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221205 +++$+++ 221209 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.203033540E09 +++$+++ I think we've really reached the stage where we've gone too long without a proper narrative. Widgery seems a good basis once you filter out all his interpreational and observational asides, and put into the correct timeline certain events he deals with elsewhere, such as the \"warning shots\" fired by the army shortly before the bulk of the shooting started. The same goes for Fr Daly's gunman, and both incidents are dealt with in ''Secret History'', so can be cited. We do, however, desperately need a good map showing the various locations and routes, otherwise I think it's very hard for anyone to follow what happened, even at the most basic level.  +++$+++ :::::I think we've really reached the stage where we've gone too long without a proper narrative. Widgery seems a good basis once you filter out all his interpreational and observational asides, and put into the correct timeline certain events he deals with elsewhere, such as the "warning shots" fired by the army shortly before the bulk of the shooting started. The same goes for Fr Daly's gunman, and both incidents are dealt with in ''Secret History'', so can be cited. We do, however, desperately need a good map showing the various locations and routes, otherwise I think it's very hard for anyone to follow what happened, even at the most basic level. [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper#top|talk]]) 15:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
221211 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221205 +++$+++ 221210 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.203034260E09 +++$+++ As even if Secret History brought up the transfer of GSR, unless that was actually brought up at the Saville Inquiry as well it doesn't go back where I removed it from. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::::As even if Secret History brought up the transfer of GSR, unless that was actually brought up at the Saville Inquiry as well it doesn't go back where I removed it from. <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">303</span>]]''</sub></font> 16:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
221212 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221205 +++$+++ 221211 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.203106020E09 +++$+++ I'm working on a background section now, including details of the march bans, rising levels of violence in Derry, no-go areas, the Ford-Tuzo memoradum etc etc. Should be finished later on, I'll let you see the draft first in case I've missed anything. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::::::I'm working on a background section now, including details of the march bans, rising levels of violence in Derry, no-go areas, the Ford-Tuzo memoradum etc etc. Should be finished later on, I'll let you see the draft first in case I've missed anything. <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">303</span>]]''</sub></font> 12:07, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
221213 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221205 +++$+++ 221212 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.203108480E09 +++$+++ About halfway through the narrative in long-hand - should be able to finish\/transcribe it tonight or tomorrow, although I need to cross-reference a couple of thing. As an aside, it's notable that Widgery's report is by no means easy to follow, and I think in at least one place he has covered certain signifcant incidents out of sequence compared to other accounts, which has a bearing on how the timeline is perceived. The lack of an index is glaring!  +++$+++ ::::::::About halfway through the narrative in long-hand - should be able to finish/transcribe it tonight or tomorrow, although I need to cross-reference a couple of thing. As an aside, it's notable that Widgery's report is by no means easy to follow, and I think in at least one place he has covered certain signifcant incidents out of sequence compared to other accounts, which has a bearing on how the timeline is perceived. The lack of an index is glaring! [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper#top|talk]]) 12:48, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
221214 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221205 +++$+++ 221211 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.203109140E09 +++$+++ Agreed re GSR\/Saville. Incidentally, I have both the ''Secret History'' and ''Inside Story'' documentaries, if you want them.  +++$+++ :::::::Agreed re GSR/Saville. Incidentally, I have both the ''Secret History'' and ''Inside Story'' documentaries, if you want them. [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper#top|talk]]) 12:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
221215 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221205 +++$+++ 221214 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.203109740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the offer, but I'll pass as I've seen them before. I think [http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/northern_ireland\/2236840.stm this] is what we were looking for anyway. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::::::Thanks for the offer, but I'll pass as I've seen them before. I think [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/2236840.stm this] is what we were looking for anyway. <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">303</span>]]''</sub></font> 13:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

16515 +++$+++ Baseball_Bugs +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-27 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.309182120E09 +++$+++ Is 66.66.27.196 a sock of the banned NYscholar, or is his editing of one of the pages edited by NYscholar, immediately after the IP's block expired, merely coincidental? \u2190 +++$+++ Is 66.66.27.196 a sock of the banned NYscholar, or is his editing of one of the pages edited by NYscholar, immediately after the IP's block expired, merely coincidental? ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 06:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
16516 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16515 +++$+++ 16515 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.309183440E09 +++$+++ Thansk, IP reblocked.    +++$+++ :Thansk, IP reblocked.   [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 07:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

540804 +++$+++ DuncanHill +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540804 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-04 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.196801400E09 +++$+++ Hi, I see you deleted [[Saltash Tunnel]]. The original author of this article (a new editor) was not informed of its candidacy for speedy deletion, neither were members of the relevant [[WP:CORNWALL|Cornwall Wikiproject]], where its creation had been announced together with a request from the original author for work to be done on it. Could you reinstate it please to allow editors to work on it?  +++$+++ Hi, I see you deleted [[Saltash Tunnel]]. The original author of this article (a new editor) was not informed of its candidacy for speedy deletion, neither were members of the relevant [[WP:CORNWALL|Cornwall Wikiproject]], where its creation had been announced together with a request from the original author for work to be done on it. Could you reinstate it please to allow editors to work on it? [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] 12:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
540805 +++$+++ DuncanHill +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540804 +++$+++ 540804 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.196807520E09 +++$+++ I have now recreated the article, with a little more context, and the appropriate cats and stubs.  +++$+++ :I have now recreated the article, with a little more context, and the appropriate cats and stubs. [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] 14:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
540806 +++$+++ DuncanHill +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540804 +++$+++ 540805 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.196822820E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your message. There is an debate which may interest you at [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28miscellaneous%29#Overly_high_standards_for_new_articles.3F]]. I remain concerned at the failure to notify the original  creator or the appropriate wikiproject of the speedying.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for your message. There is an debate which may interest you at [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28miscellaneous%29#Overly_high_standards_for_new_articles.3F]]. I remain concerned at the failure to notify the original  creator or the appropriate wikiproject of the speedying. [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] 18:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
540807 +++$+++ DuncanHill +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540804 +++$+++ 540804 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.196823540E09 +++$+++ I found this comment highly offensive and unecessary ''\"creating an article with no content other than some templates is nothing approaching high standards; from context do we know it was a tunnel, a person's name, a public house, a town, a farm, or a joke? It is not incumbent upon anyone to notify anyone about a speedy deletion, first; second, just because a wikiproject \"claims\" an article, it does not WP:OWN it; and third, if wikiproject Cornwall is in habit of filling in its missing spaces by adding articles that consist of nothing but two templates as above it is seriously amiss and way out of line of other wikiprojects. Carlossuarez46 18:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)\"'' The original article was created by a new editor with very little experience, I believe that [[WP:BITE]] is worth bearing in mind when dealing with contributions from new editors. The new editor, obviously aware that the article needed work, approached an appropriate wikiproject to request other editors contribute, I believe that this displays good faith on his part, as well as a willingness to collaborate. As to the Wikiproject, it is entirely untrue to allege that \"Wikiproject Cornwall fills in its missing spaces by adding articles that consist of nothing but two templates\". The wikiproject is not claiming \"ownership\" of the article - but when an editor invites a wikiproject to improve an article he created it is good manners to invite that project to participate in a deletion process. I am sorry that you do not think it appropriate to invite contributions from wikiprojects, or to invite an original good-faith author to expand his stub.  +++$+++ :I found this comment highly offensive and unecessary ''"creating an article with no content other than some templates is nothing approaching high standards; from context do we know it was a tunnel, a person's name, a public house, a town, a farm, or a joke? It is not incumbent upon anyone to notify anyone about a speedy deletion, first; second, just because a wikiproject "claims" an article, it does not WP:OWN it; and third, if wikiproject Cornwall is in habit of filling in its missing spaces by adding articles that consist of nothing but two templates as above it is seriously amiss and way out of line of other wikiprojects. Carlossuarez46 18:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)"'' The original article was created by a new editor with very little experience, I believe that [[WP:BITE]] is worth bearing in mind when dealing with contributions from new editors. The new editor, obviously aware that the article needed work, approached an appropriate wikiproject to request other editors contribute, I believe that this displays good faith on his part, as well as a willingness to collaborate. As to the Wikiproject, it is entirely untrue to allege that "Wikiproject Cornwall fills in its missing spaces by adding articles that consist of nothing but two templates". The wikiproject is not claiming "ownership" of the article - but when an editor invites a wikiproject to improve an article he created it is good manners to invite that project to participate in a deletion process. I am sorry that you do not think it appropriate to invite contributions from wikiprojects, or to invite an original good-faith author to expand his stub. [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] 18:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
540808 +++$+++ DuncanHill +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540804 +++$+++ 540807 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.196824200E09 +++$+++ I do not understand your last comment at my talk page. The Cornwall Wikiproject was never given the opportunity to comment on the speedy, as whoever tagged the article for speedy did not bother telling anyone (and the page is on my watchlist, and I never saw the tag). The original editor entered the article as \"needing attention\" at the wikiproject - the speedying prevented attention being given. I still say - you should give more consideration to new editors, who may well be driven away by speedy deletions of articles they have created, especially when no-one has the common courtesy to explain what is happening to them.  +++$+++ ::I do not understand your last comment at my talk page. The Cornwall Wikiproject was never given the opportunity to comment on the speedy, as whoever tagged the article for speedy did not bother telling anyone (and the page is on my watchlist, and I never saw the tag). The original editor entered the article as "needing attention" at the wikiproject - the speedying prevented attention being given. I still say - you should give more consideration to new editors, who may well be driven away by speedy deletions of articles they have created, especially when no-one has the common courtesy to explain what is happening to them. [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] 19:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
540809 +++$+++ DuncanHill +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540804 +++$+++ 540808 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.196827860E09 +++$+++ Final questions on this matter to you - Who tagged the article for speedying, and how long elapsed from the article being tagged and your deletion of it? Thanks.  +++$+++ :::Final questions on this matter to you - Who tagged the article for speedying, and how long elapsed from the article being tagged and your deletion of it? Thanks. [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] 20:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

16517 +++$+++ Mtking +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-02 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.309621140E09 +++$+++ While I agree with closing the current discussion, and agree that it had reached a dead end and there was no consensus for the proposed change as it was, I do think there was consensus for some form of change. As such I would like you to re-view your closing comment and re-word it to closer reflect that please.  +++$+++ While I agree with closing the current discussion, and agree that it had reached a dead end and there was no consensus for the proposed change as it was, I do think there was consensus for some form of change. As such I would like you to re-view your closing comment and re-word it to closer reflect that please. [[User:Mtking|Mtking]] ([[User talk:Mtking|talk]]) 08:39, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
16518 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16517 +++$+++ 16517 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.309624800E09 +++$+++ My wording was deliberate and considered.  Participants seem happy to consider a change but none of the mooted changes got up.  Consensus may change if a new wording can be found.   +++$+++ :My wording was deliberate and considered.  Participants seem happy to consider a change but none of the mooted changes got up.  Consensus may change if a new wording can be found.  [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 09:40, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
16519 +++$+++ Johnlp +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16517 +++$+++ 16518 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.309674360E09 +++$+++ Thank you for closing this thread. I think you are right to do so and I appreciate the thoughtful wording you used.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for closing this thread. I think you are right to do so and I appreciate the thoughtful wording you used. [[User:Johnlp|Johnlp]] ([[User talk:Johnlp|talk]]) 23:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

278663 +++$+++ GracieLizzie +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278663 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-14 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.210796940E09 +++$+++ How in the world is a link to a trailer \"spam\". I don't spam. I am mildly offended to be accused of doing so. -- +++$+++ How in the world is a link to a trailer "spam". I don't spam. I am mildly offended to be accused of doing so. --[[User:GracieLizzie|GracieLizzie]] ([[User talk:GracieLizzie|talk]]) 13:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
278664 +++$+++ GracieLizzie +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278663 +++$+++ 278663 +++$+++ 2008-05-14 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.210800660E09 +++$+++ Apology accepted. However I can't think of a way to link to the trailer other than by examples of it hosted on news sites. -- +++$+++ :Apology accepted. However I can't think of a way to link to the trailer other than by examples of it hosted on news sites. --[[User:GracieLizzie|GracieLizzie]] ([[User talk:GracieLizzie|talk]]) 14:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

16520 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16520 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.310421180E09 +++$+++ returning with a good edit summary - trust you have suitable heating at your end of the woods :)    +++$+++ returning with a good edit summary - trust you have suitable heating at your end of the woods :)   [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 14:53, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
16521 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16520 +++$+++ 16520 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.310421420E09 +++$+++ G'day cobber.  I'm still waiting for my lunch invite!  Drop me a line when you've got a few hours to spare.   +++$+++ :G'day cobber.  I'm still waiting for my lunch invite!  Drop me a line when you've got a few hours to spare.  [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 14:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
16522 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16520 +++$+++ 16521 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.310421480E09 +++$+++ yeah I can think of a lot of jokes against self about the most delayed lunch.. will try soon   +++$+++ ::yeah I can think of a lot of jokes against self about the most delayed lunch.. will try soon  [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 14:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

278666 +++$+++ Doczilla +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-30 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.212132840E09 +++$+++ Please explain what \"it\" is. If you're simply making a sock report, then that needs to be reported elsewhere. If \"it\" refers to specific vandalism, please say so in your AIV report.  +++$+++ Please explain what "it" is. If you're simply making a sock report, then that needs to be reported elsewhere. If "it" refers to specific vandalism, please say so in your AIV report. [[User:Doczilla|<span style="color:green;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">Doczilla</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Doczilla|<small>STOMP!</small>]]</sub> 00:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
278667 +++$+++ Dhett +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278666 +++$+++ 278666 +++$+++ 2008-05-30 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.212156000E09 +++$+++ FYI - [[User_talk:Dhett#\"Only warning\" | More from this admin]] and [[User_talk:Doczilla#RE: \"Only warning\" for anon user 76.195.180.84 | my responses]].  +++$+++ * FYI - [[User_talk:Dhett#"Only warning" | More from this admin]] and [[User_talk:Doczilla#RE: "Only warning" for anon user 76.195.180.84 | my responses]]. [[User:Dhett|dhett]] <sup>([[User talk:Dhett|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Dhett|contribs]])</sup> 07:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
278668 +++$+++ Doczilla +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278666 +++$+++ 278666 +++$+++ 2008-05-30 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.212191220E09 +++$+++ Yes, an obvious sock of a block-evading vandal can be banned on sight. But if you want that to happen, you need to prove to admins that it is an obvious sock of a block-evading vandal. For example, a vandal once known as Creepy Crawler drives us nuts. A ready evidence list appears at [[Category talk:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Creepy Crawler]] so that any admin available to evaluate the sock can quickly take action. Without explaining anything about the history, you're asking an admin who doesn't know you to take you at your word when assuming good faith about your statement would mean failing to assume good faith about the other person. I've seen too many people make sock accusations against others, some of which could not be correct, to block somebody just because someone else makes a vague statement that a sock is \"back at it again.\" If you want the person blocked quickly, you need to explain.  +++$+++ :Yes, an obvious sock of a block-evading vandal can be banned on sight. But if you want that to happen, you need to prove to admins that it is an obvious sock of a block-evading vandal. For example, a vandal once known as Creepy Crawler drives us nuts. A ready evidence list appears at [[Category talk:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Creepy Crawler]] so that any admin available to evaluate the sock can quickly take action. Without explaining anything about the history, you're asking an admin who doesn't know you to take you at your word when assuming good faith about your statement would mean failing to assume good faith about the other person. I've seen too many people make sock accusations against others, some of which could not be correct, to block somebody just because someone else makes a vague statement that a sock is "back at it again." If you want the person blocked quickly, you need to explain. [[User:Doczilla|<span style="color:green;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">Doczilla</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Doczilla|<small>STOMP!</small>]]</sub> 16:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

16523 +++$+++ Jezhotwells +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.310635200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for staying on the case, Moondyne.  +++$+++ Thanks for staying on the case, Moondyne. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 02:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
16524 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16523 +++$+++ 16523 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.310636040E09 +++$+++ Note that [[Wikipedia:SILVERLOCK#Semi-protection|\"A page ''and'' its talk page should not ''both'' be protected at the same time.\"]].  That makes sense but I'll leave in place until somene can suggest a better solution.   +++$+++ :Note that [[Wikipedia:SILVERLOCK#Semi-protection|"A page ''and'' its talk page should not ''both'' be protected at the same time."]].  That makes sense but I'll leave in place until somene can suggest a better solution.  [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 02:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
16525 +++$+++ Penwhale +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16523 +++$+++ 16524 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.312307520E09 +++$+++ Note that your protection log comment at [[Talk:Harold Pinter]] is confusing (You have it as \"Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked\" which... clearly isn't the case for an article talk page) -  +++$+++ ::Note that your protection log comment at [[Talk:Harold Pinter]] is confusing (You have it as "Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked" which... clearly isn't the case for an article talk page) - [[User:Penwhale|Penwhale]] &#124; <sup>[[User_talk:Penwhale|dance in the air]] and [[Special:Contributions/Penwhale|follow his steps]]</sup> 10:52, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

16526 +++$+++ Schniggendiller +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.312344780E09 +++$+++ Hi, do you still need this file (description reads \"can be deleted in 48 hours\")? The reason I ask: Images, whose filenames ends with a %-sgn, are often not properly displayed ([[bugzilla:26233]]). Currently I\u2019m looking for files like this, to move them to a name that let\u2019s them work, but if you don\u2019t need this anymore, it could be deleted. Greetings -- +++$+++ Hi, do you still need this file (description reads "can be deleted in 48 hours")? The reason I ask: Images, whose filenames ends with a %-sgn, are often not properly displayed ([[bugzilla:26233]]). Currently I’m looking for files like this, to move them to a name that let’s them work, but if you don’t need this anymore, it could be deleted. Greetings --[[User:Schniggendiller|Schniggendiller]] [[User Talk:Schniggendiller|<small> talk </small>]] 21:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
16527 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16526 +++$+++ 16526 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.312348680E09 +++$+++ {{fixed}}.  Thanks.  +++$+++ :{{fixed}}.  Thanks. [[User:Moondyne|Moondyne]] ([[User talk:Moondyne#top|talk]]) 22:18, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
16528 +++$+++ Schniggendiller +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ 16526 +++$+++ 16527 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.312671060E09 +++$+++ I have to admit that there\u2019s another file ([[:File:PortalRhodeIsland-IE8-49%.jpg]]). Would be easier if I reported this in one go. Sorry :-) Greetings -- +++$+++ ::I have to admit that there’s another file ([[:File:PortalRhodeIsland-IE8-49%.jpg]]). Would be easier if I reported this in one go. Sorry :-) Greetings --[[User:Schniggendiller|Schniggendiller]] [[User Talk:Schniggendiller|<small> talk </small>]] 15:51, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

278673 +++$+++ 68.219.27.195 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-09 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.215591780E09 +++$+++ The quote I added from ALL on the Walt Disney article is included in the source directed on the page, [http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-srv\/style\/longterm\/review96\/flionking.htm| read it] before blindly reverting edits. The statement was listed before but was incomplete, I simply completed the entire quote. Before it only included only half the quote, perhaps to enforce your own opinions as you accused me of doing.  [[Special:Contributions\/68.219.27.195|68.219.27.195]] ( +++$+++ The quote I added from ALL on the Walt Disney article is included in the source directed on the page, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/review96/flionking.htm| read it] before blindly reverting edits. The statement was listed before but was incomplete, I simply completed the entire quote. Before it only included only half the quote, perhaps to enforce your own opinions as you accused me of doing.  [[Special:Contributions/68.219.27.195|68.219.27.195]] ([[User talk:68.219.27.195|talk]]) 01:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
278674 +++$+++ Kenneth Hardeman +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278673 +++$+++ 278673 +++$+++ 2008-07-09 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.215592860E09 +++$+++ However, there are some statements on Disney's controversial persona listed on the article that may prove to be original research. If you want to improve the Walt Disney Company article I suggest improving the list of miscellaneous information in the article that follows the company's history and deleting original research, however other editors may condemn you for deleting sourced information because it contradicts your opinions. Cheers!  +++$+++ : However, there are some statements on Disney's controversial persona listed on the article that may prove to be original research. If you want to improve the Walt Disney Company article I suggest improving the list of miscellaneous information in the article that follows the company's history and deleting original research, however other editors may condemn you for deleting sourced information because it contradicts your opinions. Cheers! [[User:Kenneth Hardeman|K.H]] ([[User talk:Kenneth Hardeman|talk]]) 01:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

16530 +++$+++ Geo Swan +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ 16530 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-23 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.245784320E09 +++$+++ Could you please review [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ACamp_X-Ray_(Guantanamo)&diff=297849953&oldid=297742133 his comments here?]   +++$+++ Could you please review [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ACamp_X-Ray_(Guantanamo)&diff=297849953&oldid=297742133 his comments here?]  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 12:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
16531 +++$+++ Yachtsman1 +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ 16530 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-23 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.245805080E09 +++$+++ I still have no conflict of interest, I just disagree with Geoswan's proposition that any DOD member identify him or herself as a matter of principle as it provdes a ready-made motive for striking any and all contributions on these subjects.  Just thought you should know from where my opinion stems.-- +++$+++ ::I still have no conflict of interest, I just disagree with Geoswan's proposition that any DOD member identify him or herself as a matter of principle as it provdes a ready-made motive for striking any and all contributions on these subjects.  Just thought you should know from where my opinion stems.--[[User:Yachtsman1|Yachtsman1]] ([[User talk:Yachtsman1|talk]]) 17:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
16532 +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ 16530 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-23 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.245822840E09 +++$+++ Eh ? Sorry guys. My vast (and badly aged) brain has no recollection of any conversations regarding the above. Happy to be reminded of any by way of diffs.  +++$+++ :::Eh ? Sorry guys. My vast (and badly aged) brain has no recollection of any conversations regarding the above. Happy to be reminded of any by way of diffs. [[User:Megapixie|Megapixie]] ([[User talk:Megapixie#top|talk]]) 22:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

264899 +++$+++ Syrthiss +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264899 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-22 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.148360700E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I wanted to let you know that I have unblocked {{user|Bptdude}} who I blocked earlier today for removing comments at the [[Talk:Stirling engine]] page.  Apparently, those comments were placed by him in the article and moved to the discussion page by another editor (Lumos3).  Bptdude felt that he didn't need to keep those comments around, and blanked them from the talk page.  He's relatively new, and didn't realize that not using edit summaries and continuing to remove them would look like vandalism.  So, you were all doing what seemed right...and he was doing what seemed right, but I just wanted to explain the situation to you all.  Hopefully I've set him on the right track and you all can continue to create a great article. Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi.  I wanted to let you know that I have unblocked {{user|Bptdude}} who I blocked earlier today for removing comments at the [[Talk:Stirling engine]] page.  Apparently, those comments were placed by him in the article and moved to the discussion page by another editor (Lumos3).  Bptdude felt that he didn't need to keep those comments around, and blanked them from the talk page.  He's relatively new, and didn't realize that not using edit summaries and continuing to remove them would look like vandalism.  So, you were all doing what seemed right...and he was doing what seemed right, but I just wanted to explain the situation to you all.  Hopefully I've set him on the right track and you all can continue to create a great article. Thanks! [[User:Syrthiss|Syrthiss]] 22:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
264900 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264899 +++$+++ 264899 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.148361420E09 +++$+++ OK thanks for clearing things up.  +++$+++ :OK thanks for clearing things up. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 22:17, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

16534 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ 16534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-04 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.252063800E09 +++$+++ [[:File:John Alexander McClernand.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:John Alexander McClernand.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:John Alexander McClernand.jpg]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:File:John Alexander McClernand.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:John Alexander McClernand.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:John Alexander McClernand.jpg]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 04:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
16535 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ 16534 +++$+++ 16534 +++$+++ 2009-09-23 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.253751240E09 +++$+++ [[:File:AWM012244JonesHancockHewitt.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:AWM012244JonesHancockHewitt.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:AWM012244JonesHancockHewitt.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:AWM012244JonesHancockHewitt.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 17:14, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
16536 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ 16534 +++$+++ 16534 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.253797080E09 +++$+++ [[:File:E04146JonesAFC.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:E04146JonesAFC.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:E04146JonesAFC.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:E04146JonesAFC.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 05:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

278680 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-06 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.220744700E09 +++$+++ The edits by 24.207.237.221 follow an existing history that are purposefully have run counter to the guidelines established in [[WP:TVS]] -- he refuses to contact or converse with anyone about his edits, and when his edits are reverted, he shifts to a new IP number and begins anew. He is referred to among the members of the [[WP:TVS]] project as the \"St. Louis Vandal,\" primarily because many of his edits are tied to St. Louis television stations. Recently, the St. Louis Vandal has been tied to BenH, who has also created an established pattern of abuse. There has been an ongoing discussion over time regarding his abuse on the talk page at [[WP:TVS]]. -- +++$+++ The edits by 24.207.237.221 follow an existing history that are purposefully have run counter to the guidelines established in [[WP:TVS]] -- he refuses to contact or converse with anyone about his edits, and when his edits are reverted, he shifts to a new IP number and begins anew. He is referred to among the members of the [[WP:TVS]] project as the "St. Louis Vandal," primarily because many of his edits are tied to St. Louis television stations. Recently, the St. Louis Vandal has been tied to BenH, who has also created an established pattern of abuse. There has been an ongoing discussion over time regarding his abuse on the talk page at [[WP:TVS]]. --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking|talk]]) 16:45, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
278681 +++$+++ Tznkai +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278680 +++$+++ 278680 +++$+++ 2008-09-06 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.220745900E09 +++$+++ Open up a new section on [[WP:AN]]. And for the record, an bad user does not a vandal make.-- +++$+++ :Open up a new section on [[WP:AN]]. And for the record, an bad user does not a vandal make.--[[User:Tznkai|Tznkai]] ([[User talk:Tznkai|talk]]) 17:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

323525 +++$+++ Instantnood +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ 323525 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-04-05 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.112736480E09 +++$+++ Ah you're there already :-D.  &mdash;  +++$+++ Ah you're there already :-D.  &mdash; [[User:Instantnood|Insta]][[User_talk:Instantnood|ntnood]] 14:28, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
323526 +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ Huaiwei +++$+++ 323525 +++$+++ 323525 +++$+++ 2005-04-06 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.112829900E09 +++$+++ Hmm...I double check them from yet another source which gives even more accurate data of when planes are delivered or scraped. Where may I check the \"monthly fleet status report?\" Btw...please do sign your name.-- +++$+++ :Hmm...I double check them from yet another source which gives even more accurate data of when planes are delivered or scraped. Where may I check the "monthly fleet status report?" Btw...please do sign your name.--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 16:25, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

278683 +++$+++ Benscripps +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-22 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.222126980E09 +++$+++ Can you point me to the relevant section in [[WP:TVS]] that cites on-air talent only in the staff section?  The reason I ask is that you recently removed chief photojournalist Corey Adkins from the article on [[WWTV]], and while in title and function he's not strictly on-air staff, he often participates on-air in live shots for the morning newscast, and is known on-air to viewers.  He's not technically on-air, but he sort of is on-air.  It's a weird situation and I'd like to see the exact rationale to see if it might be appropriate to add him back in.  Thanks!  +++$+++ Can you point me to the relevant section in [[WP:TVS]] that cites on-air talent only in the staff section?  The reason I ask is that you recently removed chief photojournalist Corey Adkins from the article on [[WWTV]], and while in title and function he's not strictly on-air staff, he often participates on-air in live shots for the morning newscast, and is known on-air to viewers.  He's not technically on-air, but he sort of is on-air.  It's a weird situation and I'd like to see the exact rationale to see if it might be appropriate to add him back in.  Thanks! [[User:Benscripps|Benscripps]] ([[User talk:Benscripps|talk]]) 16:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
278684 +++$+++ Benscripps +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278683 +++$+++ 278683 +++$+++ 2008-09-23 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.222171200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification--I know just what you mean about everybody and their brother being listed on station pages (the WWTV page was like that in the past).  I'll probably add him back in with some sort of notation about his on-air status. +++$+++ : Thanks for the clarification--I know just what you mean about everybody and their brother being listed on station pages (the WWTV page was like that in the past).  I'll probably add him back in with some sort of notation about his on-air status.[[User:Benscripps|Benscripps]] ([[User talk:Benscripps|talk]]) 05:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

16540 +++$+++ Janke +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ 16540 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-19 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.261255080E09 +++$+++ PS: I also fixed File:8mm and super8 and double8.png. -- +++$+++ PS: I also fixed File:8mm and super8 and double8.png. --[[User:Janke|Janke]] | [[User talk:Janke|Talk]] 12:38, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
16541 +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ 16540 +++$+++ 16540 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.268589060E09 +++$+++ You are free to do what you like with the image. But I'm not going to provide a release. Best regards.  +++$+++ :You are free to do what you like with the image. But I'm not going to provide a release. Best regards. [[User:Megapixie|Megapixie]] ([[User talk:Megapixie#top|talk]]) 10:51, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
16542 +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ 16540 +++$+++ 16540 +++$+++ 2010-05-20 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.274378820E09 +++$+++ Happy to talk here or at another project page. Let me know.  +++$+++ :Happy to talk here or at another project page. Let me know. [[User:Megapixie|Megapixie]] ([[User talk:Megapixie#top|talk]]) 11:07, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

87841 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-08 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.299640320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 19:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
87842 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87841 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.299815280E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  I made it with the help of a dictionary.   +++$+++ :::Thanks!  I made it with the help of a dictionary.  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 19:48, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
87843 +++$+++ Yogesh Khandke +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87841 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.299882000E09 +++$+++ Don't you think the knife cuts both ways if at all it does in my case, also, I too tried to search for the phrase but could not get the answer. +++$+++ ::::Don't you think the knife cuts both ways if at all it does in my case, also, I too tried to search for the phrase but could not get the answer.[[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 14:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
87844 +++$+++ Yogesh Khandke +++$+++ Fowler&fowler +++$+++ 87841 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.299890940E09 +++$+++ I breezed through 60 search results[http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ADBR_enIN273IN294&q=persistent+teacher#q=persistent+teacher&hl=en&rlz=1T4ADBR_enIN273IN294&prmd=ivns&ei=HVF6TeW9EsnNrQeV2IXWBQ&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=a50d8bbb4089c98a] (summaries only) for the string ''persistent teacher'' but did not find the meaning implied by your explanations; perhaps the phrase is not popular beyond your circle, (wherever it is). Thanks for the trouble please if possible share a few links in good sources where the said meaning is manifest. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :::::I breezed through 60 search results[http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ADBR_enIN273IN294&q=persistent+teacher#q=persistent+teacher&hl=en&rlz=1T4ADBR_enIN273IN294&prmd=ivns&ei=HVF6TeW9EsnNrQeV2IXWBQ&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=a50d8bbb4089c98a] (summaries only) for the string ''persistent teacher'' but did not find the meaning implied by your explanations; perhaps the phrase is not popular beyond your circle, (wherever it is). Thanks for the trouble please if possible share a few links in good sources where the said meaning is manifest. Thanks again. [[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 16:49, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

395973 +++$+++ 5dsddddd +++$+++ Hbdragon88 +++$+++ 395973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-24 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.203902280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:5dsddddd|5dsddddd]] ([[User talk:5dsddddd|talk]]) 17:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
395974 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ Hbdragon88 +++$+++ 395973 +++$+++ 395973 +++$+++ 2008-03-14 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.205544480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Seraphim Whipp|<font color="FF69B4">Seraphim&hearts;</font>]]  [[User_talk:Seraphim Whipp|<sup><font color="black">Whipp</font></sup>]] 18:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

278691 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278691 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-12 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.223800680E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Pok%C3%A9mon:_Advanced_Generation&curid=7043024&diff=244687848&oldid=244687660 this edit], you can hardly call one response to your nomination at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Pok\xe9mon: Advanced Generation]] a [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] or \"decision\". Rather than edit war, perhaps relist the article at AfD and seek wider input. Cheers. --  +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pok%C3%A9mon:_Advanced_Generation&curid=7043024&diff=244687848&oldid=244687660 this edit], you can hardly call one response to your nomination at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon: Advanced Generation]] a [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] or "decision". Rather than edit war, perhaps relist the article at AfD and seek wider input. Cheers. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 01:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
278692 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278691 +++$+++ 278691 +++$+++ 2008-10-12 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.223800980E09 +++$+++ I'm not giving you a hard time. I'm just pointing out your choice to redirect the article is backed by one voice of support. If you feel that's what the community wants, allow them to say so. I don't care either way if the article or redirect exists, but 1 person (or 2, including yourself) is not the community. --  +++$+++ :I'm not giving you a hard time. I'm just pointing out your choice to redirect the article is backed by one voice of support. If you feel that's what the community wants, allow them to say so. I don't care either way if the article or redirect exists, but 1 person (or 2, including yourself) is not the community. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 01:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
278693 +++$+++ Longhair +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278691 +++$+++ 278692 +++$+++ 2008-10-12 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.223801640E09 +++$+++ Often AfDs are permitted to run longer than usual so more editors can have input. A relisted template is often added to a AfD if more responses are required. I'm not suggesting the decision to close the AfD was wrong, or that your decision to redirect the article is wrong either, but I'm saying your argument based on a \"decision\" is easily shot down should one decide to complain. Before you know it, you'll be back at AfD all over again, simply adding to any previous drama. Enough said. We're both right :) --  +++$+++ ::Often AfDs are permitted to run longer than usual so more editors can have input. A relisted template is often added to a AfD if more responses are required. I'm not suggesting the decision to close the AfD was wrong, or that your decision to redirect the article is wrong either, but I'm saying your argument based on a "decision" is easily shot down should one decide to complain. Before you know it, you'll be back at AfD all over again, simply adding to any previous drama. Enough said. We're both right :) -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 01:54, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

540837 +++$+++ Fayenatic_london +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.199311320E09 +++$+++ RSVP at its [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion\/Log\/2007 December 28#Category:Romulan characters|CFD]]. -  +++$+++ RSVP at its [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 December 28#Category:Romulan characters|CFD]]. - [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User_talk:Fayenatic_london|(talk)]] 14:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
540838 +++$+++ Fayenatic_london +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540837 +++$+++ 540837 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.199410140E09 +++$+++ And again, please...  +++$+++ :And again, please... [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User_talk:Fayenatic_london|(talk)]] 17:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
540839 +++$+++ Fayenatic_london +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540837 +++$+++ 540838 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.199419440E09 +++$+++ I apologise for giving offence by my tone. But please don't [[WP:BITE|be so terse]] in discussions. -  +++$+++ ::I apologise for giving offence by my tone. But please don't [[WP:BITE|be so terse]] in discussions. - [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User_talk:Fayenatic_london|(talk)]] 20:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

278695 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-27 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.225109940E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 05:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
278696 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278695 +++$+++ 278695 +++$+++ 2008-11-05 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.225938480E09 +++$+++ Please provide independent, verifiable sources (as noted by [[WP:V]]) for the claims, otherwise, the posting of your information on the Trial By Jury page would likely be construed as vandalism. -- +++$+++ :Please provide independent, verifiable sources (as noted by [[WP:V]]) for the claims, otherwise, the posting of your information on the Trial By Jury page would likely be construed as vandalism. --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking#top|talk]]) 18:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
278697 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278695 +++$+++ 278695 +++$+++ 2008-11-28 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.227926880E09 +++$+++ Could you remove the templated warning off of Darth Panda's Page since it was a mistake. Thanks --'''[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]]'''&nbsp;([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]]&nbsp;::&nbsp;[[::Special:Contributions\/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 18:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :Could you remove the templated warning off of Darth Panda's Page since it was a mistake. Thanks --'''[[::User:Sidonuke|Sidonuke]]'''&nbsp;([[::User talk:Sidonuke|talk]]&nbsp;::&nbsp;[[::Special:Contributions/Sidonuke|contribs]]) 18:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
278698 +++$+++ Darth_Panda +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278695 +++$+++ 278697 +++$+++ 2008-11-28 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.227936300E09 +++$+++ A strikethrough would have sufficed, but thank you. Sorry for all of the trouble! <font color=\"777777\"> +++$+++ ::A strikethrough would have sufficed, but thank you. Sorry for all of the trouble! <font color="777777">[[User:Darth_Panda|D<small>ARTH</small> P<small>ANDA</small>]]</font>[[User_talk:Darth_Panda|<sup><small><font color="990000">duel</font></small></sup>]] 21:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
278699 +++$+++ Darth_Panda +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278695 +++$+++ 278698 +++$+++ 2008-11-29 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.227954540E09 +++$+++ By the way, I'm not an [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FEdit_warring&diff=254683023&oldid=254657120 admin]. <font color=\"777777\"> +++$+++ :::By the way, I'm not an [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FEdit_warring&diff=254683023&oldid=254657120 admin]. <font color="777777">[[User:Darth_Panda|D<small>ARTH</small> P<small>ANDA</small>]]</font>[[User_talk:Darth_Panda|<sup><small><font color="990000">duel</font></small></sup>]] 02:29, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
278700 +++$+++ Darth_Panda +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278695 +++$+++ 278699 +++$+++ 2008-11-29 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.227955860E09 +++$+++ Haha, thanks. I've got a ways to go though! <font color=\"777777\"> +++$+++ ::::Haha, thanks. I've got a ways to go though! <font color="777777">[[User:Darth_Panda|D<small>ARTH</small> P<small>ANDA</small>]]</font>[[User_talk:Darth_Panda|<sup><small><font color="990000">duel</font></small></sup>]] 02:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

527047 +++$+++ TRAVELLINGCARI +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527047 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-08 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.210246200E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Burnsifarian&curid=17318266&diff=210965253&oldid=210965092 here]. I didn't realise the creator had undone my speedy and then you re-tagged. I think the history loaded oddly for me because when I undid my own speedy yours didn't show. Sorry 'bout that. <sub> +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Burnsifarian&curid=17318266&diff=210965253&oldid=210965092 here]. I didn't realise the creator had undone my speedy and then you re-tagged. I think the history loaded oddly for me because when I undid my own speedy yours didn't show. Sorry 'bout that. <sub>[[User_talk:Travellingcari|TravellingCari]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Travellingcari|the Busy Bee]]</sup> 04:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
527048 +++$+++ TRAVELLINGCARI +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527047 +++$+++ 527047 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.210246800E09 +++$+++ I think what happened was the first tagger wiped the whole article and put {{tl|cfd}} which was what led me to tagging G1 -- thiking it was a re-creation of a deleted post complete with speedy. Then when I refreshed and saw it had content, I de-tagged as G1 not realising ou'd re-tagged as G3. If nothing else, it will be an amusing AfD along the lines of other recent ones of monkeys and superheroes but obviously feel free to Speedy it if you think it's G3-able. <sub> +++$+++ : I think what happened was the first tagger wiped the whole article and put {{tl|cfd}} which was what led me to tagging G1 -- thiking it was a re-creation of a deleted post complete with speedy. Then when I refreshed and saw it had content, I de-tagged as G1 not realising ou'd re-tagged as G3. If nothing else, it will be an amusing AfD along the lines of other recent ones of monkeys and superheroes but obviously feel free to Speedy it if you think it's G3-able. <sub>[[User_talk:Travellingcari|TravellingCari]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Travellingcari|the Busy Bee]]</sup> 04:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

540845 +++$+++ Arbeit Sockenpuppe +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-09 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.199934960E09 +++$+++ Just as an FYI, nobody repealed stoning as a punishment for certain transgressions. It's just that we no longer have properly constituted Jewish courts with enough authority to do that.  +++$+++ Just as an FYI, nobody repealed stoning as a punishment for certain transgressions. It's just that we no longer have properly constituted Jewish courts with enough authority to do that. [[User:Arbeit Sockenpuppe|Arbeit Sockenpuppe]] ([[User talk:Arbeit Sockenpuppe|talk]]) 19:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
540846 +++$+++ Arbeit Sockenpuppe +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540845 +++$+++ 540845 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.199936460E09 +++$+++ We agree, there is nothing in the Old Testament that allows non-compliance with its commandments just because there aren't courts. The Orthodox believe the punishment accrues, even if no human is entitled to decide to mete it out.  +++$+++ :We agree, there is nothing in the Old Testament that allows non-compliance with its commandments just because there aren't courts. The Orthodox believe the punishment accrues, even if no human is entitled to decide to mete it out. [[User:Arbeit Sockenpuppe|Arbeit Sockenpuppe]] ([[User talk:Arbeit Sockenpuppe|talk]]) 19:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
540847 +++$+++ Arbeit Sockenpuppe +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540845 +++$+++ 540846 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.199938860E09 +++$+++ So what is the nature and genesis of your interest in Judaism, Holocaust, Zionism, Terrorism & Antisemitism, if I may ask?  +++$+++ ::So what is the nature and genesis of your interest in Judaism, Holocaust, Zionism, Terrorism & Antisemitism, if I may ask? [[User:Arbeit Sockenpuppe|Arbeit Sockenpuppe]] ([[User talk:Arbeit Sockenpuppe|talk]]) 20:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

278704 +++$+++ Marshall Williams2 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-27 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.230440760E09 +++$+++ Are you absolutely sure? Because we don't want wrong information again. -- +++$+++ Are you absolutely sure? Because we don't want wrong information again. --[[User:Marshall Williams2|Marshall T. Williams]] ([[User talk:Marshall Williams2|talk]]) 21:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
278705 +++$+++ Marshall Williams2 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278704 +++$+++ 278704 +++$+++ 2008-12-27 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.230440880E09 +++$+++ And also, Six Flags over Georgia is not in Austell. It is in unincorporated Cobb County - it just has a Austell mailing address. -- +++$+++ *And also, Six Flags over Georgia is not in Austell. It is in unincorporated Cobb County - it just has a Austell mailing address. --[[User:Marshall Williams2|Marshall T. Williams]] ([[User talk:Marshall Williams2|talk]]) 21:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

16564 +++$+++ Steve Dufour +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-28 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.288304400E09 +++$+++ Hi Kookyunii. I am wondering why you created the new category \"[[:Category:Tongil Group subsidiaries]]\". I'm not saying its wrong and maybe you have information that I don't have. I am a Unification Church member (for a long time actually) and I always understood that News World was supported by members in Japan, not the Tongil Group.  +++$+++ Hi Kookyunii. I am wondering why you created the new category "[[:Category:Tongil Group subsidiaries]]". I'm not saying its wrong and maybe you have information that I don't have. I am a Unification Church member (for a long time actually) and I always understood that News World was supported by members in Japan, not the Tongil Group. [[User:Steve Dufour|Steve Dufour]] ([[User talk:Steve Dufour|talk]]) 15:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
16565 +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16564 +++$+++ 16564 +++$+++ 2010-10-28 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.288310580E09 +++$+++ Hi, welcome your asking. You know what... \"[[Unification Church]]\" is just a religion, is NOT a corporation. [[Sun Myung Moon|Moon Seon-Myung]] (\ubb38\uc120\uba85) is a founder & leader of Unification Church as well as a notable owner of conglomerate \"'''[[Tongil Group]]'''\". So I created that category, and want to know you to understand my answer. --  +++$+++ : Hi, welcome your asking. You know what... "[[Unification Church]]" is just a religion, is NOT a corporation. [[Sun Myung Moon|Moon Seon-Myung]] (문선명) is a founder & leader of Unification Church as well as a notable owner of conglomerate "'''[[Tongil Group]]'''". So I created that category, and want to know you to understand my answer. -- [[User:Kookyunii|Kookyunii]] ([[User talk:Kookyunii#top|talk]]) 17:03, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
16566 +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16564 +++$+++ 16564 +++$+++ 2010-10-28 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.288310580E09 +++$+++ \"'''[[News World Communications]]'''\" is a media company, owned by Moon. Sources of the fact are in [http:\/\/biz.yahoo.com\/ic\/54\/54437.html], [http:\/\/www.hoovers.com\/company\/News_World_Communications_Inc\/hccyki-1.html], [http:\/\/www.cjr.org\/resources\/index.php?c=newsworld], [http:\/\/www.mediaowners.com\/company\/newsworld.html], etc. As a result, News World Communications is a asset of Moon's corp that is Tongil Group. --  +++$+++ : "'''[[News World Communications]]'''" is a media company, owned by Moon. Sources of the fact are in [http://biz.yahoo.com/ic/54/54437.html], [http://www.hoovers.com/company/News_World_Communications_Inc/hccyki-1.html], [http://www.cjr.org/resources/index.php?c=newsworld], [http://www.mediaowners.com/company/newsworld.html], etc. As a result, News World Communications is a asset of Moon's corp that is Tongil Group. -- [[User:Kookyunii|Kookyunii]] ([[User talk:Kookyunii#top|talk]]) 17:03, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
16567 +++$+++ Steve Dufour +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16564 +++$+++ 16566 +++$+++ 2010-10-28 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.288311660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your answer. I understand what you are saying. If you want to take the position that \"Tongil Group\" equals \"Businesses owned by UC members\" I guess that is not unreasonable. Please check out [[List of Unification Church affiliated organizations]]. Also information on the Tongil Group should be added to the main article on the church. While you are at it, please feel free to jump into the discussion on the proper version of Korean names to use for Rev. Moon's family and for other Korean church members.- +++$+++ ::Thanks for your answer. I understand what you are saying. If you want to take the position that "Tongil Group" equals "Businesses owned by UC members" I guess that is not unreasonable. Please check out [[List of Unification Church affiliated organizations]]. Also information on the Tongil Group should be added to the main article on the church. While you are at it, please feel free to jump into the discussion on the proper version of Korean names to use for Rev. Moon's family and for other Korean church members.-[[User:Steve Dufour|Steve Dufour]] ([[User talk:Steve Dufour|talk]]) 17:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

540855 +++$+++ Bearian +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-24 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.201239480E09 +++$+++ Wow, you actually created a cute stub! :-)  +++$+++ Wow, you actually created a cute stub! :-) [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 21:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
540856 +++$+++ Bearian +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540855 +++$+++ 540855 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.201241040E09 +++$+++ I'm doing the same.  Hey, can you please tell me if [[Audrey Mullender|this article]] has been fixed enough by being stub-ified?  +++$+++ :I'm doing the same.  Hey, can you please tell me if [[Audrey Mullender|this article]] has been fixed enough by being stub-ified? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 22:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

16569 +++$+++ Bovineboy2008 +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16569 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-17 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.290034200E09 +++$+++ Hi Kookyunii! Just came across your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Blades_of_Blood&diff=397099405&oldid=397088572 edit] to ''Blades of Blood'' and wanted to remind of some style guidelines for the infobox. We don't use flags in infoboxes anymore (haven't for a while now), see [[MOS:FLAG]]. Also, we don't need to link the language of the film if there is just one. The infobox coding will automatically link it and will also add a convenient autocat. Just some things to keep in mind while you continue make great contributions! <small> +++$+++ Hi Kookyunii! Just came across your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blades_of_Blood&diff=397099405&oldid=397088572 edit] to ''Blades of Blood'' and wanted to remind of some style guidelines for the infobox. We don't use flags in infoboxes anymore (haven't for a while now), see [[MOS:FLAG]]. Also, we don't need to link the language of the film if there is just one. The infobox coding will automatically link it and will also add a convenient autocat. Just some things to keep in mind while you continue make great contributions! <small>[[User:Bovineboy2008|BOVINEBOY]]</small>[[User talk:Bovineboy2008|2008]] 14:50, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
16570 +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16569 +++$+++ 16569 +++$+++ 2010-11-17 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.290037860E09 +++$+++ Okay, I see what you said. I will give my careful consideration. --  +++$+++ : Okay, I see what you said. I will give my careful consideration. -- [[User:Kookyunii|Kookyunii]] ([[User talk:Kookyunii#top|talk]]) 15:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

524294 +++$+++ Catherineyronwode +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-08 06:38:00 +++$+++ 1.189258680E09 +++$+++ catherine  +++$+++ catherine [[User:Catherineyronwode|Catherineyronwode]] 06:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
524295 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524294 +++$+++ 524294 +++$+++ 2007-09-08 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.189286640E09 +++$+++ if you really suspect company involvement, see if the [[WikiScanner]] will help. I've not used it yet, but this is what it is supposed to be for. -- +++$+++ * if you really suspect company involvement, see if the [[WikiScanner]] will help. I've not used it yet, but this is what it is supposed to be for. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
524296 +++$+++ Catherineyronwode +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524294 +++$+++ 524295 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.189429560E09 +++$+++ Well, thanks for that interesting link. WikiScanner helped me pinpoint the odd fact that two of the different anon IP alterers (removers of references to popcorn) on the bronchiolitis obliterans page have also edited the page on Jonathan Pollard, Israeli spy. Anyway. i did find the cites requested, and have continued to work on the page. It's just one of those weird things...  cat  +++$+++ ::Well, thanks for that interesting link. WikiScanner helped me pinpoint the odd fact that two of the different anon IP alterers (removers of references to popcorn) on the bronchiolitis obliterans page have also edited the page on Jonathan Pollard, Israeli spy. Anyway. i did find the cites requested, and have continued to work on the page. It's just one of those weird things...  cat [[User:Catherineyronwode|Catherineyronwode]] 06:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
524297 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524294 +++$+++ 524296 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.189482420E09 +++$+++ I looked at it some more, there's room for compromise. It looks like, as the IP writes (by the way, 24... and 209... come from the same city in Alabama, so I suspect they're the same person), that BO is a rare disease caused when something damages your lungs. The diacetyl flavoring in fake-butter popcorn is just one of the possibilities for those somethings, that happens to have gotten some press lately; however someone suffering from BO from transplant rejection (as, say, [http:\/\/path.upmc.edu\/divisions\/pulmpath\/bron02.htm this article from University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, as best I can tell]) would be greatly surprised to be told they have Popcorn Worker's Lung. So while we should certainly document all the diacetyl and popcorn stuff, but we shouldn't say they're synonyms, we should say that PWL is a specific form of BO. If it looks like PWL is overweighing the article, we create a new article on PWL, and leave a summary section in BO. That's called [[Wikipedia:Summary style]]. But right now it does not seem to be overweighing the article, being less than a quarter of the total article length. Want me to write that on the article talk page, or do you think you have worked it out there? -- +++$+++ ::: I looked at it some more, there's room for compromise. It looks like, as the IP writes (by the way, 24... and 209... come from the same city in Alabama, so I suspect they're the same person), that BO is a rare disease caused when something damages your lungs. The diacetyl flavoring in fake-butter popcorn is just one of the possibilities for those somethings, that happens to have gotten some press lately; however someone suffering from BO from transplant rejection (as, say, [http://path.upmc.edu/divisions/pulmpath/bron02.htm this article from University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, as best I can tell]) would be greatly surprised to be told they have Popcorn Worker's Lung. So while we should certainly document all the diacetyl and popcorn stuff, but we shouldn't say they're synonyms, we should say that PWL is a specific form of BO. If it looks like PWL is overweighing the article, we create a new article on PWL, and leave a summary section in BO. That's called [[Wikipedia:Summary style]]. But right now it does not seem to be overweighing the article, being less than a quarter of the total article length. Want me to write that on the article talk page, or do you think you have worked it out there? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 20:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

16571 +++$+++ Steve Dufour +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-20 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.290288300E09 +++$+++ Would you like to visit [[Unification Church]] and provide the original Korean names for the official names of the church: \"The Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity\" and \"The Family Federation for World Peace and Unification\"?  Thanks if you can do this.  +++$+++ Would you like to visit [[Unification Church]] and provide the original Korean names for the official names of the church: "The Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity" and "The Family Federation for World Peace and Unification"?  Thanks if you can do this. [[User:Steve Dufour|Steve Dufour]] ([[User talk:Steve Dufour|talk]]) 13:25, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
16572 +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16571 +++$+++ 16571 +++$+++ 2010-11-23 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.290564660E09 +++$+++ I hope my answer will give you satisfaction. --  +++$+++ : I hope my answer will give you satisfaction. -- [[User:Kookyunii|Kookyunii]] ([[User talk:Kookyunii#top|talk]]) 18:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

278716 +++$+++ TomCat4680 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278716 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-26 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.235645400E09 +++$+++ Please tell me what non-germane means. Seriously, I've never heard that word in my entire life but you love to use it. Did you make it up? Is it in any dictionary? +++$+++ Please tell me what non-germane means. Seriously, I've never heard that word in my entire life but you love to use it. Did you make it up? Is it in any dictionary?[[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 02:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
278717 +++$+++ TomCat4680 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278716 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-26 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.235646060E09 +++$+++ never mind I looked it up. why don't you use normal words that people use every day like I don't know, '''relevant'''? It makes you look pompous. +++$+++ ::never mind I looked it up. why don't you use normal words that people use every day like I don't know, '''relevant'''? It makes you look pompous.[[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 03:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

16573 +++$+++ Bollyjeff +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-23 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.290552840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Bollyjeff|<span style="color:blue">'''BollyJeff'''</span>]] <span style="color:green">||</span> [[User talk:Bollyjeff|<span style="color:red">'''''talk'''''</span>]] 14:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
16574 +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16573 +++$+++ 16573 +++$+++ 2010-11-23 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.290563580E09 +++$+++ \u2014 By the way, Have you watched ''The Classic''? This film is one of my favorate movies. --  +++$+++ : — By the way, Have you watched ''The Classic''? This film is one of my favorate movies. -- [[User:Kookyunii|Kookyunii]] ([[User talk:Kookyunii#top|talk]]) 17:53, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
16575 +++$+++ Bollyjeff +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16573 +++$+++ 16574 +++$+++ 2010-11-23 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.290570600E09 +++$+++ Yeah, those links aren't going to be helpful for the EN.wiki.  Yes, I have seen it and love it very much! I think the music has a lot to do with why I like it. It seems to not get the recognition of other K-movies like ''My Sassy Girl'', but to those who do like it, it is often their favorite.  Since we both like this one, what other Asian movies or dramas would you recommend for me?  I have seen only ''Autumn in my Heart'' in the drama category, but have seen about a dozen Asian romance movies, mostly Korean (not counting Indian of course).  +++$+++ :: Yeah, those links aren't going to be helpful for the EN.wiki.  Yes, I have seen it and love it very much! I think the music has a lot to do with why I like it. It seems to not get the recognition of other K-movies like ''My Sassy Girl'', but to those who do like it, it is often their favorite.  Since we both like this one, what other Asian movies or dramas would you recommend for me?  I have seen only ''Autumn in my Heart'' in the drama category, but have seen about a dozen Asian romance movies, mostly Korean (not counting Indian of course). [[User:Bollyjeff|<span style="color:blue">'''BollyJeff'''</span>]] <span style="color:green">||</span> [[User talk:Bollyjeff|<span style="color:red">'''''talk'''''</span>]] 19:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

540864 +++$+++ DuncanHill +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540864 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-30 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.201705140E09 +++$+++ Hi, I see you speedy deleted [[Cornish-speakers]]. It was on my watchlist, so presumably I have edited it at some point (though can't recall when). Would it be possible for you to provide the deleted content for me (either by email or on a userpage) so I can see what it was, and if I can do anything to improve it to meet Wikipedia standards? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, I see you speedy deleted [[Cornish-speakers]]. It was on my watchlist, so presumably I have edited it at some point (though can't recall when). Would it be possible for you to provide the deleted content for me (either by email or on a userpage) so I can see what it was, and if I can do anything to improve it to meet Wikipedia standards? Thanks. [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 06:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
540865 +++$+++ DuncanHill +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540864 +++$+++ 540864 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.201743360E09 +++$+++ Many thanks - it ''is'' short isn't it!  +++$+++ :Many thanks - it ''is'' short isn't it! [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 17:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

16577 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-26 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.293398220E09 +++$+++ You are listed in the [[:Category:Wikipedians interested in sociology]], probably due to the use of [[:User:UBX\/Sociology|\"This user is interested in sociology\"]] userbox, but you have not added yourself to our [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology\/Members|official member list]] for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology|WikiProject Sociology]]. This prevents you from, among other things, receiving our sociology newsletter, as that member list acts as our newsletter mailing list (you can find the latest issue of our sociology newsletter [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Sociology\/Newsletter|here]]). If you'd like to receive the newsletter and help us figure out how many members we really have, please consider joining our WikiProject and adding yourself to our official member list. Thank you, --<sub><span style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ You are listed in the [[:Category:Wikipedians interested in sociology]], probably due to the use of [[:User:UBX/Sociology|"This user is interested in sociology"]] userbox, but you have not added yourself to our [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology/Members|official member list]] for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology|WikiProject Sociology]]. This prevents you from, among other things, receiving our sociology newsletter, as that member list acts as our newsletter mailing list (you can find the latest issue of our sociology newsletter [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Sociology/Newsletter|here]]). If you'd like to receive the newsletter and help us figure out how many members we really have, please consider joining our WikiProject and adding yourself to our official member list. Thank you, --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 13:17, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
16578 +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16577 +++$+++ 16577 +++$+++ 2010-12-26 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.293401040E09 +++$+++ I will consider about it. Thanks. --  +++$+++ : I will consider about it. Thanks. -- [[User:Kookyunii|Kookyunii]] ([[User talk:Kookyunii#top|talk]]) 14:04, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

540866 +++$+++ Kraken7 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-30 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.201752120E09 +++$+++ First, please take another look and you'll find that I have signed it.  Second, it would have been nice to explain this in the box where it was announced that the page had been deleted, no?  +++$+++ First, please take another look and you'll find that I have signed it.  Second, it would have been nice to explain this in the box where it was announced that the page had been deleted, no? [[User:Kraken7|Kraken7]] ([[User talk:Kraken7|talk]]) 20:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
540867 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540866 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-31 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.201788420E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADlohcierekim&diff=188096950&oldid=188059960 My pleasure.] I've learned to look at G1 tagged articles with an eye to saving them. You'd be surprised. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADlohcierekim&diff=188096950&oldid=188059960 My pleasure.] I've learned to look at G1 tagged articles with an eye to saving them. You'd be surprised. Cheers, [[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500">  Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 06:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
540868 +++$+++ UzEE +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540866 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-01 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.201860300E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the G1. All I saw was a disambig with no further links so I tagged it. You expanded that later. +++$+++ :::Sorry for the G1. All I saw was a disambig with no further links so I tagged it. You expanded that later.[[User:UzEE|<span style="font-family:Arial">'''<span style="color:#02B5F0">  U<span style="color:#FF4246">z</span>EE </span>'''</span>]] ([[User_talk:UzEE|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/UzEE|Contribs]]) 02:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

16581 +++$+++ Erik1980 +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-16 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.297918500E09 +++$+++ In [[Love and Other Drugs]] you added the official website. This URL, however, goes straight to the Amazon.com product page, so I had removed it a couple of days earlier. Is there any added value in keeping the link? Best,  +++$+++ In [[Love and Other Drugs]] you added the official website. This URL, however, goes straight to the Amazon.com product page, so I had removed it a couple of days earlier. Is there any added value in keeping the link? Best, [[User:Erik1980|Erik1980]] ([[User talk:Erik1980|talk]]) 20:55, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
16582 +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ Kookyunii +++$+++ 16581 +++$+++ 16581 +++$+++ 2011-02-17 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.297993020E09 +++$+++ Oh! I'm sorry. I didn't know the fact. I just added the address after seeing that thing at the IMDb. Now I removed it. --  +++$+++ : Oh! I'm sorry. I didn't know the fact. I just added the address after seeing that thing at the IMDb. Now I removed it. -- [[User:Kookyunii|Kookyunii]] ([[User talk:Kookyunii#top|talk]]) 17:37, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

540872 +++$+++ 139.142.131.114 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540872 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-04 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.202177940E09 +++$+++ Why? \"Article about a web site that does not assert significance)\". It's currently being mentioned on many sites due to it's Super Bowl ad in 2000, but there's very little on the web about what happened to it. Wikipedia is exactly the place I looked for more information about what happened to them. Upon seeing no information, I started looking for some to create a page so others can find information. Sure, it wasn't pretty or complete, but it was a start. Without it being started, it'd never exist. I thought this was exactly what Wikipedia was for? This is what I was talking about in the Talk page of the article (go read it). [[Special:Contributions\/139.142.131.114|139.142.131.114]] ( +++$+++ Why? "Article about a web site that does not assert significance)". It's currently being mentioned on many sites due to it's Super Bowl ad in 2000, but there's very little on the web about what happened to it. Wikipedia is exactly the place I looked for more information about what happened to them. Upon seeing no information, I started looking for some to create a page so others can find information. Sure, it wasn't pretty or complete, but it was a start. Without it being started, it'd never exist. I thought this was exactly what Wikipedia was for? This is what I was talking about in the Talk page of the article (go read it). [[Special:Contributions/139.142.131.114|139.142.131.114]] ([[User talk:139.142.131.114|talk]]) 18:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
540873 +++$+++ 139.142.131.114 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540872 +++$+++ 540872 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.202178420E09 +++$+++ sigh* This is why editing Wikipedia is a waste of time - too many rules for the sake of rules. This was my first, and last, attempt at contributing to Wikipedia. Thanks for making it so frustrating. [[Special:Contributions\/139.142.131.114|139.142.131.114]] ( +++$+++ *sigh* This is why editing Wikipedia is a waste of time - too many rules for the sake of rules. This was my first, and last, attempt at contributing to Wikipedia. Thanks for making it so frustrating. [[Special:Contributions/139.142.131.114|139.142.131.114]] ([[User talk:139.142.131.114|talk]]) 18:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

540875 +++$+++ Rockk3r +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-04 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.202182500E09 +++$+++ I made a mistake I need to put the redirect in the article [[Directo a la luz]] to [[Directo A La Luz]], but with [[List of CryWar band members]] there was no mistake or anything like it, ''CryWar'' doesn't even exists, there was a cofusion with [[WarCry (band)|WarCry]].  +++$+++ I made a mistake I need to put the redirect in the article [[Directo a la luz]] to [[Directo A La Luz]], but with [[List of CryWar band members]] there was no mistake or anything like it, ''CryWar'' doesn't even exists, there was a cofusion with [[WarCry (band)|WarCry]]. [[User:Rockk3r|Rockk3r]] ([[User talk:Rockk3r|talk]]) 19:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
540876 +++$+++ Rockk3r +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540875 +++$+++ 540875 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.202183220E09 +++$+++ I agree with you, but even on their official website there is no references about ''who'' where the members before 2001, so we must live it from 2001-presnt only, until we find that information from a reliable source.  +++$+++ :I agree with you, but even on their official website there is no references about ''who'' where the members before 2001, so we must live it from 2001-presnt only, until we find that information from a reliable source. [[User:Rockk3r|Rockk3r]] ([[User talk:Rockk3r|talk]]) 19:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
540877 +++$+++ Rockk3r +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540875 +++$+++ 540876 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.202183220E09 +++$+++ Let me tell you something '''''I understand Spanish''''', i don't know why yo said ''basura'', if you are talking about what I'm doing, then OK, but you most ''Respect''  +++$+++ :: Let me tell you something '''''I understand Spanish''''', i don't know why yo said ''basura'', if you are talking about what I'm doing, then OK, but you most ''Respect'' [[User:Rockk3r|Rockk3r]] ([[User talk:Rockk3r|talk]]) 19:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

278732 +++$+++ Glunnbuck +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278732 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-08 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.236508260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Glunnbuck|Glunnbuck]] ([[User talk:Glunnbuck|talk]]) 03:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
278733 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278732 +++$+++ 278732 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.236508380E09 +++$+++ :The characterization you use (i.e., his \"screaming\" as evidence that he is not a pundit among other things) does fly in the face of NPOV. Please seek consensus as opposed to imposing said NPOV. -- +++$+++ * :The characterization you use (i.e., his "screaming" as evidence that he is not a pundit among other things) does fly in the face of NPOV. Please seek consensus as opposed to imposing said NPOV. --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking|talk]]) 03:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

540881 +++$+++ NiggardlyNorm +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-08 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.202460900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:NiggardlyNorm|NiggardlyNorm]] ([[User talk:NiggardlyNorm|talk]]) 00:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
540882 +++$+++ NiggardlyNorm +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540881 +++$+++ 540881 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.202461380E09 +++$+++ Instead of engaging in a dialog with me, you immediately nominated the article for deletion? Are you a bot?  +++$+++ :Instead of engaging in a dialog with me, you immediately nominated the article for deletion? Are you a bot? [[User:NiggardlyNorm|NiggardlyNorm]] ([[User talk:NiggardlyNorm|talk]]) 01:03, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
540883 +++$+++ NiggardlyNorm +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540881 +++$+++ 540882 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.202461740E09 +++$+++ My God, you leave a \"last warning\" template on my talk page instead of responding like a human being? What is going on here? You are an admin?  +++$+++ ::My God, you leave a "last warning" template on my talk page instead of responding like a human being? What is going on here? You are an admin? [[User:NiggardlyNorm|NiggardlyNorm]] ([[User talk:NiggardlyNorm|talk]]) 01:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
540884 +++$+++ b +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540881 +++$+++ 540881 +++$+++ 2008-02-08 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.202472480E09 +++$+++ I don't see how your block of this user is appropriate unless there is something more than what he said right here.  This may not be the way you would address the queen of England, but it's hardly a personal attack.  Besides, except for flagrant cases (ie, death threats or replacing your page with profanities) you should let another admin make the decision rather than making yourself as the aggrieved party.  Please consider removing your block or providing additional information justifying it beyond what is right here.  -- +++$+++ :I don't see how your block of this user is appropriate unless there is something more than what he said right here.  This may not be the way you would address the queen of England, but it's hardly a personal attack.  Besides, except for flagrant cases (ie, death threats or replacing your page with profanities) you should let another admin make the decision rather than making yourself as the aggrieved party.  Please consider removing your block or providing additional information justifying it beyond what is right here.  --[[User:B|B]] ([[User talk:B|talk]]) 04:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

16597 +++$+++ Tool-apc +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-16 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.250481960E09 +++$+++ I'm so sorry for the previous comment man. I had spent a lot of time on that article and seeing it deleted just set something off. I'm sorry and I hope you can forgive me.  +++$+++ I'm so sorry for the previous comment man. I had spent a lot of time on that article and seeing it deleted just set something off. I'm sorry and I hope you can forgive me. [[User:Tool-apc|<b><span style="color:Black">mÆniac</span></b>]] [[User talk:Tool-apc|<b><sup><font color="#0000ff">Ask!</font></sup></b>]] 21:06, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
16598 +++$+++ Tool-apc +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16597 +++$+++ 16597 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.250561220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for understanding :)  +++$+++ :Thanks for understanding :) [[User:Tool-apc|<b><span style="color:Black">mÆniac</span></b>]] [[User talk:Tool-apc|<b><sup><font color="#0000ff">Ask!</font></sup></b>]] 19:07, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

278742 +++$+++ Arthur Rubin +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278742 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-11 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.236759960E09 +++$+++ It's not a speedy delete.  It's not NEAR a speedy delete.  Please be more careful, when tagging.  \u2014  +++$+++ It's not a speedy delete.  It's not NEAR a speedy delete.  Please be more careful, when tagging.  — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]]  [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 01:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
278743 +++$+++ Arthur Rubin +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278742 +++$+++ 278742 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.236760920E09 +++$+++ Continuing.  You're creating vandalism now, not reverting it.  \u2014  +++$+++ :Continuing.  You're creating vandalism now, not reverting it.  — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]]  [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 01:42, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
278744 +++$+++  Toddst1 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278742 +++$+++ 278743 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.236764280E09 +++$+++ [[Ragging Deaths]] was not [[Wikipedia:Patent nonsense]]. Speedy declined.  Please stop. Continuing bad tagging after this third notice will find you blocked.  +++$+++ ::[[Ragging Deaths]] was not [[Wikipedia:Patent nonsense]]. Speedy declined.  Please stop. Continuing bad tagging after this third notice will find you blocked. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 02:38, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

540887 +++$+++ Hiding +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.202949180E09 +++$+++ I've restored the article on [[Pamela Rambo]] since it is an invalid deletion per CDS A7. A7 refers to articles that make no claim of importance or significance at all.  This is a professional artist working in a mass medium on high profile works.  I'll try and fix up the article as best I can in the next couple of days, if you'll allow me that grace, and then we can see if an afd is in order.  Hope that is okay.  +++$+++ I've restored the article on [[Pamela Rambo]] since it is an invalid deletion per CDS A7. A7 refers to articles that make no claim of importance or significance at all.  This is a professional artist working in a mass medium on high profile works.  I'll try and fix up the article as best I can in the next couple of days, if you'll allow me that grace, and then we can see if an afd is in order.  Hope that is okay. [[User:Hiding|Hiding]] <small>[[User talk:Hiding|T]] </small> 16:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
540888 +++$+++ Hiding +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540887 +++$+++ 540887 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.203025260E09 +++$+++ I do consider a colorist working in the comic book industry to be a professional artist working in a mass medium, and she has worked on high profile works.  I'm somewhat disappointed that you've taken this straight to afd, since I was going to look for a redirect target until sources turned up, but real life intervened.  I apologise if I offended you in any way. All the best,  +++$+++ *I do consider a colorist working in the comic book industry to be a professional artist working in a mass medium, and she has worked on high profile works.  I'm somewhat disappointed that you've taken this straight to afd, since I was going to look for a redirect target until sources turned up, but real life intervened.  I apologise if I offended you in any way. All the best, [[User:Hiding|Hiding]] <small>[[User talk:Hiding|T]] </small> 13:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

16600 +++$+++ Pdfpdf +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-25 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.251232260E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry about the tone of this posting, but lets face it, your action doesn't reflect positively on you. Cheers,  +++$+++ I'm sorry about the tone of this posting, but lets face it, your action doesn't reflect positively on you. Cheers, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 13:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
16601 +++$+++ Pdfpdf +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16600 +++$+++ 16600 +++$+++ 2009-08-25 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.251232560E09 +++$+++ OK, you've removed the speedy. But it DOESN'T need a prod. I needs YOU to think about what's going on, and if you don't understand, ask a question on my talk page.  +++$+++ :OK, you've removed the speedy. But it DOESN'T need a prod. I needs YOU to think about what's going on, and if you don't understand, ask a question on my talk page. [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 13:36, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
16602 +++$+++ Pdfpdf +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16600 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-25 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.251233280E09 +++$+++ Look, I'm not interested in talking about this. You stuffed up. You still haven't apologised. Go irriate somebody else please. Bye-bye.  +++$+++ :::Look, I'm not interested in talking about this. You stuffed up. You still haven't apologised. Go irriate somebody else please. Bye-bye. [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 13:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

540889 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.202958000E09 +++$+++ Another editor has added the <code>{{tl|prod}}<\/code> template to the article [[Unthank, Moray]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability]]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at [[Talk:Unthank, Moray|its talk page]]. If you remove the <code>{{tl|prod}}<\/code> template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. <!-- Template:PRODNote -->  +++$+++ Another editor has added the <code>{{tl|prod}}</code> template to the article [[Unthank, Moray]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability]]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at [[Talk:Unthank, Moray|its talk page]]. If you remove the <code>{{tl|prod}}</code> template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. <!-- Template:PRODNote --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 19:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
540890 +++$+++ Billreid +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540889 +++$+++ 540889 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.203184860E09 +++$+++ Please provide a map reference to this ''ghost'' village.  Rgds,  +++$+++ :Please provide a map reference to this ''ghost'' village.  Rgds, [[User:Billreid|Bill Reid]] | [[User talk:Billreid|Talk]] 10:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
540891 +++$+++ Billreid +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540889 +++$+++ 540890 +++$+++ 2008-02-18 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.203367980E09 +++$+++ Still waiting for accurate co-ordinates.  +++$+++ ::Still waiting for accurate co-ordinates. [[User:Billreid|Bill Reid]] | [[User talk:Billreid|Talk]] 12:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

278746 +++$+++ Diamondsandpearls +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-26 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.238127240E09 +++$+++ Those are my numerous questions. Not if she is her sister or not. Thank You-- +++$+++ Those are my numerous questions. Not if she is her sister or not. Thank You--[[User:Diamondsandpearls|Diamondsandpearls]] ([[User talk:Diamondsandpearls|talk]]) 21:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
278747 +++$+++ 67.177.195.177 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278746 +++$+++ 278746 +++$+++ 2009-03-29 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.238386020E09 +++$+++ Besides, go online and read the Hartford Courant or the local television stations (WFSB TV 3, WTNH TV8, and WVIT TV 30).  The entire local medial calls it \"UConn,\" no one calls it \"Connecticut.\"  Also, the team's nickname \"Huskies\" only works with \"UConn\" (ie, like the dog who pulls a sled, a \"Yukon Husky\").  If the university was called \"Connecticut,\" wouldn't a more appropriate nickname be something like the \"Nutmeggers\"?  The school is UConn, and I did NOT commit vandalism!  Marty in Boulder,3\/29\/2009 [[Special:Contributions\/67.177.195.177|67.177.195.177]] ( +++$+++ :Besides, go online and read the Hartford Courant or the local television stations (WFSB TV 3, WTNH TV8, and WVIT TV 30).  The entire local medial calls it "UConn," no one calls it "Connecticut."  Also, the team's nickname "Huskies" only works with "UConn" (ie, like the dog who pulls a sled, a "Yukon Husky").  If the university was called "Connecticut," wouldn't a more appropriate nickname be something like the "Nutmeggers"?  The school is UConn, and I did NOT commit vandalism!  Marty in Boulder,3/29/2009 [[Special:Contributions/67.177.195.177|67.177.195.177]] ([[User talk:67.177.195.177|talk]]) 21:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

16603 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16603 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-25 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.251233760E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry that I clicked on a button that I didn't intend to. However, in light of your complaining, I have given your article a second look and found several problems: a title that does not follow the Manual of Style (\"NZ\" instead of \"New Zealand\"), lack of an explanation as to what this list is, and obvious formatting problems. Moreover, the list has no references for verification, and has some obvious template problems as well. I'll [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] that this is a work in progress, but you might help your cause by placing an {{tl|underconstruction}} template at the top. -  +++$+++ I'm sorry that I clicked on a button that I didn't intend to. However, in light of your complaining, I have given your article a second look and found several problems: a title that does not follow the Manual of Style ("NZ" instead of "New Zealand"), lack of an explanation as to what this list is, and obvious formatting problems. Moreover, the list has no references for verification, and has some obvious template problems as well. I'll [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] that this is a work in progress, but you might help your cause by placing an {{tl|underconstruction}} template at the top. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 13:56, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
16604 +++$+++ Pdfpdf +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16603 +++$+++ 16603 +++$+++ 2009-08-25 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.251235140E09 +++$+++ No big deal - just interested to read your reply. Cheers,  +++$+++ :No big deal - just interested to read your reply. Cheers, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 14:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
16605 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16603 +++$+++ 16604 +++$+++ 2009-08-25 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.251235320E09 +++$+++ Simple answer: I was in a hurry on new-page patrol. Lousy excuse, but it's the best I've got today. -  +++$+++ ::Simple answer: I was in a hurry on new-page patrol. Lousy excuse, but it's the best I've got today. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 14:22, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
16606 +++$+++ Pdfpdf +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16603 +++$+++ 16605 +++$+++ 2009-08-25 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.251235620E09 +++$+++ Lol! (Isn't that called [[Occam's razor]]?) Thanks for the reply. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Lol! (Isn't that called [[Occam's razor]]?) Thanks for the reply. Cheers, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 14:27, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

540893 +++$+++ Gwguffey +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-14 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.203050280E09 +++$+++ Hi, Carlossuarez46. Please refrain from adding bold text to entries on disambiguation pages as you did to [[Grant City (disambiguation)]], [[Peter Law (disambiguation)]] and [[Dunster (disambiguation)]].  [[MOS:DAB#Individual entries]] specifies that this practice is unnecessary. If you feel a certain entry is clearly most commonly sought after, move them to the top of the list. Happy editing. - +++$+++ Hi, Carlossuarez46. Please refrain from adding bold text to entries on disambiguation pages as you did to [[Grant City (disambiguation)]], [[Peter Law (disambiguation)]] and [[Dunster (disambiguation)]].  [[MOS:DAB#Individual entries]] specifies that this practice is unnecessary. If you feel a certain entry is clearly most commonly sought after, move them to the top of the list. Happy editing. -[[User:Gwguffey|Gwguffey]] ([[User talk:Gwguffey|talk]]) 20:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
540894 +++$+++ Gwguffey +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540893 +++$+++ 540893 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.203054300E09 +++$+++ [[MOS:DAB#Individual entries]] says, \"There is no need to emphasize the link with bolding or italics\". So, you are technically correct that it does not say 'don't do it'.  Neither does it say, 'bold whichever link you personally feel should be given emphasis'. Disambiguation is about quickly finding the desired article and bolding links does not aid in quickly scanning the list. The bolding you are adding is not convention and you will be wasting the time of people working on disambiguation that have to clean up your bolding to match the other articles. So, please reconsider this practice.  - +++$+++ :[[MOS:DAB#Individual entries]] says, "There is no need to emphasize the link with bolding or italics". So, you are technically correct that it does not say 'don't do it'.  Neither does it say, 'bold whichever link you personally feel should be given emphasis'. Disambiguation is about quickly finding the desired article and bolding links does not aid in quickly scanning the list. The bolding you are adding is not convention and you will be wasting the time of people working on disambiguation that have to clean up your bolding to match the other articles. So, please reconsider this practice.  -[[User:Gwguffey|Gwguffey]] ([[User talk:Gwguffey|talk]]) 21:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
540895 +++$+++ Gwguffey +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540893 +++$+++ 540894 +++$+++ 2008-02-14 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.203055020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the follow up and the clarification.  I'm going to take this over to Disambig Project and see if there are other thoughts or opinions on this. Perhaps there does need to be a clarification of the style in this case one way or the other. Best wishes. - +++$+++ ::Thanks for the follow up and the clarification.  I'm going to take this over to Disambig Project and see if there are other thoughts or opinions on this. Perhaps there does need to be a clarification of the style in this case one way or the other. Best wishes. -[[User:Gwguffey|Gwguffey]] ([[User talk:Gwguffey|talk]]) 21:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
540896 +++$+++ Gwguffey +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540893 +++$+++ 540895 +++$+++ 2008-02-15 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.203125220E09 +++$+++ fyi, [[MOS:DAB]] has now been updated to clarify this topic. - +++$+++ :::fyi, [[MOS:DAB]] has now been updated to clarify this topic. -[[User:Gwguffey|Gwguffey]] ([[User talk:Gwguffey|talk]]) 17:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

278750 +++$+++ TomCat4680 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278750 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-05 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.238978040E09 +++$+++ Hi I saw you mentioned that DirecTV has plans to add MSNBC HD upon launch on [[List of DirecTV channels#Future DirecTV channels]] but the source you referenced has nothing about DirecTV in it, its just about the HD launch itself, so I removed it per [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. Do you have a source that specifically says DirecTV WILL add it upon launch?  +++$+++ Hi I saw you mentioned that DirecTV has plans to add MSNBC HD upon launch on [[List of DirecTV channels#Future DirecTV channels]] but the source you referenced has nothing about DirecTV in it, its just about the HD launch itself, so I removed it per [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. Do you have a source that specifically says DirecTV WILL add it upon launch? [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 17:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
278751 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278750 +++$+++ 278750 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.238979060E09 +++$+++ No worries; I misplaced the original article (which is pretty old in and of itself) -- but in it, it includes MSNBC among HD channels DirecTV would add upon launching. In any event, the article itself is old, and given that many HD channel additions previously promised and announced have been put off by DirecTV (E!, Style, Travel Channel, Hallmark Movie Channel, et.al.), I wouldn't be surprised if they held off on launching until D12 reaches orbit late this summer or early this fall. So, leaving MSNBC off the list is not a problem in my mind.... -- +++$+++ :No worries; I misplaced the original article (which is pretty old in and of itself) -- but in it, it includes MSNBC among HD channels DirecTV would add upon launching. In any event, the article itself is old, and given that many HD channel additions previously promised and announced have been put off by DirecTV (E!, Style, Travel Channel, Hallmark Movie Channel, et.al.), I wouldn't be surprised if they held off on launching until D12 reaches orbit late this summer or early this fall. So, leaving MSNBC off the list is not a problem in my mind.... --[[User:Mhking|mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking|talk]]) 17:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
278752 +++$+++ TomCat4680 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278750 +++$+++ 278751 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.238979180E09 +++$+++ Ok well it'd be a great if it could be confirmed that MSNBC HD will be on DirecTV upon launch. Hey by any chance are you \"DodgerKing\" on any TV forums such as HighDefForums.com, SatelliteGuys.US or DBSTalk.com?  +++$+++ ::Ok well it'd be a great if it could be confirmed that MSNBC HD will be on DirecTV upon launch. Hey by any chance are you "DodgerKing" on any TV forums such as HighDefForums.com, SatelliteGuys.US or DBSTalk.com? [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 17:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
278753 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278750 +++$+++ 278752 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.238981100E09 +++$+++ No, I'm not DodgerKing...I go as mhking on all three forums, though I am more quiet than I used to be on those forums.... -- +++$+++ :::No, I'm not DodgerKing...I go as mhking on all three forums, though I am more quiet than I used to be on those forums.... --[[User:Mhking|mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking|talk]]) 18:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

16610 +++$+++ Drewguy12345 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16610 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-04 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.252106880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Drewguy12345|Drewguy12345]] ([[User talk:Drewguy12345|talk]]) 16:28, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
16611 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16610 +++$+++ 16610 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.252486740E09 +++$+++ I did, several days ago. Sign in under your user name and check your [[User talk:Drewguy12345|talk page]]. -  +++$+++ :I did, several days ago. Sign in under your user name and check your [[User talk:Drewguy12345|talk page]]. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 01:59, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

278756 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-09 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.239260400E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add commentary or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles{{#if:Life on Mars (U.S. TV series)|, as you did to [[:Life on Mars (U.S. TV series)]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.  {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npov2 -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add commentary or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles{{#if:Life on Mars (U.S. TV series)|, as you did to [[:Life on Mars (U.S. TV series)]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.  {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> [[User:Mhking|mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking|talk]]) 00:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
278757 +++$+++ Mdriver1981 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278756 +++$+++ 278756 +++$+++ 2009-04-09 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.239260640E09 +++$+++ I will do as I wish.  This is a free country. +++$+++ :I will do as I wish.  This is a free country.[[User:Mdriver1981|Mdriver1981]] ([[User talk:Mdriver1981|talk]]) 00:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

16613 +++$+++ SebastianHelm +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16613 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-15 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.253058360E09 +++$+++ I declined your speedy deletion request for [[Woman beater]], which patently fails [[WP:G3]]. (See [[talk:Woman beater]] for details.) Please be more cautious with speedy deletion requests in the future, and think about how you can help new users, instead of templating them into submission. \u2014  +++$+++ I declined your speedy deletion request for [[Woman beater]], which patently fails [[WP:G3]]. (See [[talk:Woman beater]] for details.) Please be more cautious with speedy deletion requests in the future, and think about how you can help new users, instead of templating them into submission. — [[User:SebastianHelm|Sebastian]] 16:46, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
16614 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16613 +++$+++ 16613 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.253093640E09 +++$+++ I resent your accusation of \"templating someone into submission.\" The article \"Woman beater\" was written in a tone similar to those who post frequent nonsense and vandal articles. I still feel a G3 speedy was justified, though there's nothing wrong with the redirect. I have spent many, many, many hours on new-page patrol, and I'm pretty sure I know what speedy-deletion criteria are. Feel free to disagree, but please be more civil in your comments and discourse, and less snarky. -  +++$+++ : I resent your accusation of "templating someone into submission." The article "Woman beater" was written in a tone similar to those who post frequent nonsense and vandal articles. I still feel a G3 speedy was justified, though there's nothing wrong with the redirect. I have spent many, many, many hours on new-page patrol, and I'm pretty sure I know what speedy-deletion criteria are. Feel free to disagree, but please be more civil in your comments and discourse, and less snarky. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 02:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
16615 +++$+++ SebastianHelm +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16613 +++$+++ 16614 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.253108100E09 +++$+++ Frustrated, she creates the page. The same minute, someone threatens to delete it immediately, and so on. When I imagined that scenario, I felt sorry for the woman, and I reacted with anger towards you. That wasn\u2019t right, but I hope you can understand me. \u2014  +++$+++ :: Frustrated, she creates the page. The same minute, someone threatens to delete it immediately, and so on. When I imagined that scenario, I felt sorry for the woman, and I reacted with anger towards you. That wasn’t right, but I hope you can understand me. — [[User:SebastianHelm|Sebastian]] 06:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
16616 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16613 +++$+++ 16615 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 08:55:00 +++$+++ 1.253116500E09 +++$+++ Understood, and apology accepted. Having looked at your previous work, your response did seem to be out of character. But we all have off days. -  +++$+++ :::Understood, and apology accepted. Having looked at your previous work, your response did seem to be out of character. But we all have off days. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 08:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

527057 +++$+++ Enigmaman +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-13 06:17:00 +++$+++ 1.213363020E09 +++$+++ Hey, I saw you blocked for three hours. The IP had received a one month block in March for a similar offense. ''' +++$+++ Hey, I saw you blocked for three hours. The IP had received a one month block in March for a similar offense. '''[[User:Enigmaman|<font color="blue">Enigma</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:Enigmaman|<b><sup>message</sup></b>]]'' 06:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
527058 +++$+++ Enigmaman +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527057 +++$+++ 527057 +++$+++ 2008-06-13 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.213363500E09 +++$+++ I don't have much hope in this case, because previous blocks had very little effect. However, I do see your point, as I did bring up at AIV the fact that a user using that IP commented several times about it being shared. I will keep a close eye on the IP, and if it persists, maybe I'll come to you again. ;) ''' +++$+++ :I don't have much hope in this case, because previous blocks had very little effect. However, I do see your point, as I did bring up at AIV the fact that a user using that IP commented several times about it being shared. I will keep a close eye on the IP, and if it persists, maybe I'll come to you again. ;) '''[[User:Enigmaman|<font color="blue">Enigma</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:Enigmaman|<b><sup>message</sup></b>]]'' 06:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
527059 +++$+++ Enigmaman +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527057 +++$+++ 527058 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.213858620E09 +++$+++ Requesting extension of block. The IP resumed vandalizing shortly after the release of the block and did get blocked again. Unfortunately, the blocking admin was unfamiliar with the history and only blocked for a week. ''' +++$+++ ::Requesting extension of block. The IP resumed vandalizing shortly after the release of the block and did get blocked again. Unfortunately, the blocking admin was unfamiliar with the history and only blocked for a week. '''[[User:Enigmaman|<font color="blue">Enigma</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:Enigmaman|<b><sup>message</sup></b>]]'' 23:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

16617 +++$+++ SDas +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-17 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.253185560E09 +++$+++ This page that I created was nominated for deletion, while the exact same page for another peer institution exists: [[Student Life in IIT Kharagpur]]. Now this is not the only one. The IITs are elite institutions in India, and each IIT has pages and pages of articles. I do not understand why this particular one was nominated for deletion?  +++$+++ This page that I created was nominated for deletion, while the exact same page for another peer institution exists: [[Student Life in IIT Kharagpur]]. Now this is not the only one. The IITs are elite institutions in India, and each IIT has pages and pages of articles. I do not understand why this particular one was nominated for deletion? [[User:SDas|SDas]] ([[User talk:SDas|talk]]) 04:06, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
16618 +++$+++ SDas +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16617 +++$+++ 16617 +++$+++ 2009-09-17 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.253185620E09 +++$+++ Further, it is a stub and I intend to expand it! +++$+++ *Further, it is a stub and I intend to expand it![[User:SDas|SDas]] ([[User talk:SDas|talk]]) 04:07, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

540906 +++$+++ Avg +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-20 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.203510900E09 +++$+++ Sorry but I really don't know how involved you are with the Macedonian issue, but it is as obvious as it gets that there is an agenda behind this book. The book was published in Skopje, from an author who is a known propagandist of Macedonist views [http:\/\/www.gate.net\/~mango\/Summary.htm]. He also refers to \"Aegean\" Macedonia, a term which is controversial and considered offensive by some Greeks. -- +++$+++ Sorry but I really don't know how involved you are with the Macedonian issue, but it is as obvious as it gets that there is an agenda behind this book. The book was published in Skopje, from an author who is a known propagandist of Macedonist views [http://www.gate.net/~mango/Summary.htm]. He also refers to "Aegean" Macedonia, a term which is controversial and considered offensive by some Greeks. --[[User_talk:Avg|<span style="color:#9090f0;background:#ccf">&nbsp;<span style="background:#99f">&nbsp;<span style="background:#66f">&nbsp;<span style="background:#11f"><b>Avg</b></span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</span>]] 04:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
540907 +++$+++ Avg +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540906 +++$+++ 540906 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.203513240E09 +++$+++ I'm sure your intentions are good, never doubted that. However, this is a really hot topic and what you did has been the cause of hundreds of revert wars. The consensus I refer to was forged after inundating the server with reverts. Any mention of the city's name in the first sentence gives undue weight to the second language. This applies to all articles I'm aware of. It might mean nothing to you, it does mean a lot though to those who want to assert their right to the region or to proclaim that there's a substantial ethnic minority there, and this is exactly the case with Simovski. And of course this goes both ways and not only for this pair, but between every pair of people in the Balkans. If there are historical or demographical reasons to mention the name in another language, we do that later in the article, but not in the first sentence. And I'm now referring to cities, not to villages. There's really no reason at all to mention the second name in villages, after all there is a list of [[Slavic toponyms for Greek places]], which I just saw you have resurrected and it's more than enough for this (if it's decided to be kept). I'd suggest you first acquaint yourself with the environment by reading [[Macedonia (terminology)]] and then [[WP:MOSMAC]] and probably communicating with admins who have a long history in these topics.-- +++$+++ :I'm sure your intentions are good, never doubted that. However, this is a really hot topic and what you did has been the cause of hundreds of revert wars. The consensus I refer to was forged after inundating the server with reverts. Any mention of the city's name in the first sentence gives undue weight to the second language. This applies to all articles I'm aware of. It might mean nothing to you, it does mean a lot though to those who want to assert their right to the region or to proclaim that there's a substantial ethnic minority there, and this is exactly the case with Simovski. And of course this goes both ways and not only for this pair, but between every pair of people in the Balkans. If there are historical or demographical reasons to mention the name in another language, we do that later in the article, but not in the first sentence. And I'm now referring to cities, not to villages. There's really no reason at all to mention the second name in villages, after all there is a list of [[Slavic toponyms for Greek places]], which I just saw you have resurrected and it's more than enough for this (if it's decided to be kept). I'd suggest you first acquaint yourself with the environment by reading [[Macedonia (terminology)]] and then [[WP:MOSMAC]] and probably communicating with admins who have a long history in these topics.--[[User_talk:Avg|<span style="color:#9090f0;background:#ccf">&nbsp;<span style="background:#99f">&nbsp;<span style="background:#66f">&nbsp;<span style="background:#11f"><b>Avg</b></span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</span>]] 05:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

278763 +++$+++ Decltype +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-04 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.241465340E09 +++$+++ In fact, I think this is not even close to being an A7 candidate, and I advise you to be more judicious in the future. <tt> +++$+++ In fact, I think this is not even close to being an A7 candidate, and I advise you to be more judicious in the future. <tt>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</tt> ([[User talk:Decltype|talk]]) 12:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
278764 +++$+++ Werldwayd +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278763 +++$+++ 278763 +++$+++ 2009-05-04 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.241476020E09 +++$+++ I would have much preferred a more lengthy process for editing the article concerned after discussions rather than rush comments by colleague [[User:decltype]]. And I certainly wouldn't have approved deleting the tag without further discussions. Tags should stay until conflicts are resolved. In any case, now that colleague ([[User:Mhking]] has referred it to deletion, let's have the comments there at http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Kristyan_Ferrer and hopefully the [[Kristyan Ferrer]] article can be saved as what's at issue is a notable actor in a majour role in an award-winning majour movie [[Sin Nombre (2009 film)]]  +++$+++ :I would have much preferred a more lengthy process for editing the article concerned after discussions rather than rush comments by colleague [[User:decltype]]. And I certainly wouldn't have approved deleting the tag without further discussions. Tags should stay until conflicts are resolved. In any case, now that colleague ([[User:Mhking]] has referred it to deletion, let's have the comments there at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kristyan_Ferrer and hopefully the [[Kristyan Ferrer]] article can be saved as what's at issue is a notable actor in a majour role in an award-winning majour movie [[Sin Nombre (2009 film)]] [[User:Werldwayd|werldwayd]] ([[User talk:Werldwayd|talk]]) 15:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
278765 +++$+++ Decltype +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278763 +++$+++ 278764 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.241527440E09 +++$+++ What \"rush comments\" are you referring to? I was merely pointing out that the article was not suitable for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]]. Either way, a week should be more than enough to improve the article. <tt> +++$+++ :: What "rush comments" are you referring to? I was merely pointing out that the article was not suitable for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]]. Either way, a week should be more than enough to improve the article. <tt>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</tt> ([[User talk:Decltype|talk]]) 05:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

540909 +++$+++ Avg +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540909 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-20 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.203572580E09 +++$+++ Hi again, I'd like to invite you to add your comment [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#User:Carlossuarez46.E2.80.8E_in_a_spell_of_controversial_edits|here]] please. Thanks-- +++$+++ Hi again, I'd like to invite you to add your comment [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Carlossuarez46.E2.80.8E_in_a_spell_of_controversial_edits|here]] please. Thanks--[[User_talk:Avg|<span style="color:#9090f0;background:#ccf">&nbsp;<span style="background:#99f">&nbsp;<span style="background:#66f">&nbsp;<span style="background:#11f"><b>Avg</b></span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</span>]] 21:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
540910 +++$+++ Bearian +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540909 +++$+++ 540909 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.203572940E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#User:Carlossuarez46.E2.80.8E_in_a_spell_of_controversial_edits|Everybody's a critic]].  [[WP:AGF|What's up?]]  +++$+++ :[[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Carlossuarez46.E2.80.8E_in_a_spell_of_controversial_edits|Everybody's a critic]].  [[WP:AGF|What's up?]] [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 21:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

570749 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-05 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.152123120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.msc]] 11:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
570750 +++$+++ Netscott +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570749 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.152135180E09 +++$+++ A fellow user had mistakenly reverted out your question on [[Talk:Spider-Man]] but I restored it. I noticed however that you added the possible copyvio image to your original message. Please don't post the image for display (links are fine) further on Wikipedia until it's copyright status is verified as doing this is counter to policy. Ok, here's to hoping that you can come up with another image in the meantime. :-)  +++$+++ ::A fellow user had mistakenly reverted out your question on [[Talk:Spider-Man]] but I restored it. I noticed however that you added the possible copyvio image to your original message. Please don't post the image for display (links are fine) further on Wikipedia until it's copyright status is verified as doing this is counter to policy. Ok, here's to hoping that you can come up with another image in the meantime. :-) [[User:Netscott|Netscott]] 14:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

16624 +++$+++ Uorallstars +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16624 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-27 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.254093720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Uorallstars|Uorallstars]] ([[User talk:Uorallstars|talk]]) 16:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
16625 +++$+++ Frmatt +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16624 +++$+++ 16624 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.254093960E09 +++$+++ Seeing as I'm the one who did the CSD Nom, I thought I'd leave some feedback here.  I nominated them (and they were deleted) because you provided no [[WP:SOURCES|Reliable Sources]] for your articles, and a search of three major search engines as well as IMDB showed absolutely no references whatsoever to anything that resembled your articles.  If you can provide reliable sources and prove that it wasn't a hoax, then you are welcome to re-create the articles, but until such time as you can do so, the articles have been deleted.  Please note that you were give an opportunity to fix this here: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Uorallstars&diff=prev&oldid=316505782 but chose not to do so.  +++$+++ :Seeing as I'm the one who did the CSD Nom, I thought I'd leave some feedback here.  I nominated them (and they were deleted) because you provided no [[WP:SOURCES|Reliable Sources]] for your articles, and a search of three major search engines as well as IMDB showed absolutely no references whatsoever to anything that resembled your articles.  If you can provide reliable sources and prove that it wasn't a hoax, then you are welcome to re-create the articles, but until such time as you can do so, the articles have been deleted.  Please note that you were give an opportunity to fix this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Uorallstars&diff=prev&oldid=316505782 but chose not to do so. [[User:Frmatt|Frmatt]] ([[User talk:Frmatt|talk]]) 16:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

483368 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-25 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.190716980E09 +++$+++ Is [[User:Davidzx]] a user page or an attack page? I can't tell which. - +++$+++ Is [[User:Davidzx]] a user page or an attack page? I can't tell which. -[[user:WarthogDemon|<font color="007FFF" face="Arial">'''Warthog'''</font>]][[User_talk:WarthogDemon|<font color="2A52BE" face="Arial">'''Demon'''</font>]] 03:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
483369 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483368 +++$+++ 483368 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.190717220E09 +++$+++ Tough call but I'm guessing it's a genuine user page.  He seems to be active so you could try asking him.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Tough call but I'm guessing it's a genuine user page.  He seems to be active so you could try asking him.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:47, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
483370 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483368 +++$+++ 483369 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.190717520E09 +++$+++ I asked him and pointed to [[WP:RFPP]] should he want semi-protection. Thanks. :) - +++$+++ ::I asked him and pointed to [[WP:RFPP]] should he want semi-protection. Thanks. :) -[[user:WarthogDemon|<font color="007FFF" face="Arial">'''Warthog'''</font>]][[User_talk:WarthogDemon|<font color="2A52BE" face="Arial">'''Demon'''</font>]] 03:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

16626 +++$+++ Frmatt +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-27 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.254094080E09 +++$+++ Sorry for conducting a conversation with a third user on your talk page, I don't like it when it happens on mine, but was watching this user's contributions and saw the question appear on your page and figured it was the easiest way to get them an answer.  +++$+++ Sorry for conducting a conversation with a third user on your talk page, I don't like it when it happens on mine, but was watching this user's contributions and saw the question appear on your page and figured it was the easiest way to get them an answer. [[User:Frmatt|Frmatt]] ([[User talk:Frmatt|talk]]) 16:28, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
16627 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16626 +++$+++ 16626 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.254094140E09 +++$+++ No problem. No apology necessary. Thanks for helping. -  +++$+++ :No problem. No apology necessary. Thanks for helping. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 16:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

16628 +++$+++ Kevin +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-01 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.254384180E09 +++$+++ Is redlinked. Twinkle failure no doubt.  +++$+++ Is redlinked. Twinkle failure no doubt. [[User:Kevin|Kevin]] ([[User talk:Kevin|talk]]) 01:03, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
16629 +++$+++ LegitimateAndEvenCompelling +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16628 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-06 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.254816600E09 +++$+++ Now Mark has singled out Will Beback.  Let me be clear that in my opinion Will Beback is acting appropriately within Wikipedia guidelines.  Mark, it is bad to just blank out sections.  Will Beback is right to restore them.  However, selective editing is needed to properly remove the material about you that does not fall within Wikipedia guidelines. -- +++$+++ ::Now Mark has singled out Will Beback.  Let me be clear that in my opinion Will Beback is acting appropriately within Wikipedia guidelines.  Mark, it is bad to just blank out sections.  Will Beback is right to restore them.  However, selective editing is needed to properly remove the material about you that does not fall within Wikipedia guidelines. --[[User:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|LegitimateAndEvenCompelling]] ([[User talk:LegitimateAndEvenCompelling|talk]]) 01:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

278773 +++$+++ Salemmaman +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-08 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.244524020E09 +++$+++ I've gone through the trouble of posting just a few of the many sources of news stories on KTN both on your deletion page and my talk page. Please respond at your convenience. +++$+++ I've gone through the trouble of posting just a few of the many sources of news stories on KTN both on your deletion page and my talk page. Please respond at your convenience.[[User:Salemmaman|Salemmaman]] ([[User talk:Salemmaman|talk]]) 22:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
278774 +++$+++ Salemmaman +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278773 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.244618400E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your help in this issue, thanks for requesting a speedy end to the deletion process. +++$+++ :::I appreciate your help in this issue, thanks for requesting a speedy end to the deletion process.[[User:Salemmaman|Salemmaman]] ([[User talk:Salemmaman|talk]]) 00:20, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

540918 +++$+++ Billreid +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-25 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.204004580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply.  I'm sorry to tell you, however, that your co-ordinates places itself in the middle of a field outside Duffus.  I should let you know that I'm from Moray formerly living within 3 miles of Duffus and have to tell you there is no such place as the village of Unthank.  Rgds,  +++$+++ Thanks for your reply.  I'm sorry to tell you, however, that your co-ordinates places itself in the middle of a field outside Duffus.  I should let you know that I'm from Moray formerly living within 3 miles of Duffus and have to tell you there is no such place as the village of Unthank.  Rgds, [[User:Billreid|Bill Reid]] | [[User talk:Billreid|Talk]] 21:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
540919 +++$+++ Billreid +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540918 +++$+++ 540918 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.204005420E09 +++$+++ What I'm saying is, there is no village called Unthank.  Take a look at the map; where is the village? Rgds,  +++$+++ :What I'm saying is, there is no village called Unthank.  Take a look at the map; where is the village? Rgds, [[User:Billreid|Bill Reid]] | [[User talk:Billreid|Talk]] 21:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

614441 +++$+++ Mais oui! +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-03 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.133640120E09 +++$+++ As an Admin, could you review the Requested move at [[Talk:Scottish_ethnicity#Requested_move_to_Scottish_people]] and move the article, re consensus? Or if any other Admins out there are reading this... Ta.-- +++$+++ As an Admin, could you review the Requested move at [[Talk:Scottish_ethnicity#Requested_move_to_Scottish_people]] and move the article, re consensus? Or if any other Admins out there are reading this... Ta.--[[User:Mais oui!|Mais oui!]] 12:02, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
614442 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614441 +++$+++ 614441 +++$+++ 2005-12-03 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.133664600E09 +++$+++ Seems a sound idea, I'll give it a couple more days in case anyone objects then should be able to sort it... +++$+++ :Seems a sound idea, I'll give it a couple more days in case anyone objects then should be able to sort it...[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]] 18:50, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
614443 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614441 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-12-04 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.133692260E09 +++$+++ and so on. ... +++$+++ :::and so on. ...[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]] 02:31, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
614444 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614441 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-12-04 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.133722980E09 +++$+++ found the intro you're thinking of: THE BOOK OF THE FILM where a hand turns pages as a voice over introduces the knights after Belvedere: Sir Gallahad the Pure (hand turns page) And Sir Robin the not-quite-so-pure.....etc... +++$+++ :::found the intro you're thinking of: THE BOOK OF THE FILM where a hand turns pages as a voice over introduces the knights after Belvedere: Sir Gallahad the Pure (hand turns page) And Sir Robin the not-quite-so-pure.....etc...[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]] 11:03, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

16632 +++$+++ 64.231.164.148 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-07 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.254917100E09 +++$+++ Your uw-npov was arrogant and inappropriate. You disagree with me about covering a notable controversy related to [[Byron York]], fine. But keep the templates to yourself, that was just childish. [[Special:Contributions\/64.231.164.148|64.231.164.148]] ( +++$+++ Your uw-npov was arrogant and inappropriate. You disagree with me about covering a notable controversy related to [[Byron York]], fine. But keep the templates to yourself, that was just childish. [[Special:Contributions/64.231.164.148|64.231.164.148]] ([[User talk:64.231.164.148|talk]]) 05:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
16633 +++$+++ 64.231.164.148 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16632 +++$+++ 16632 +++$+++ 2009-10-07 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.254917880E09 +++$+++ Since you love slinging around policies to win content disputes, why don't you quote me the policy that says \"people who understand wikipedia are required to have accounts, and if they edit from an IP, other wikipedians should make derogatory insinuations about them and demand they log in.\" Jackass. [[Special:Contributions\/64.231.164.148|64.231.164.148]] ( +++$+++ :Since you love slinging around policies to win content disputes, why don't you quote me the policy that says "people who understand wikipedia are required to have accounts, and if they edit from an IP, other wikipedians should make derogatory insinuations about them and demand they log in." Jackass. [[Special:Contributions/64.231.164.148|64.231.164.148]] ([[User talk:64.231.164.148|talk]]) 05:18, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

264916 +++$+++ DaveRo +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-13 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.152818880E09 +++$+++ Do you still think it's in the NPR?  +++$+++ Do you still think it's in the NPR? [[User:DaveRo|DaveRo]] 12:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
264917 +++$+++ DaveRo +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264916 +++$+++ 264916 +++$+++ 2006-07-13 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.152823560E09 +++$+++ Nevermind - I found it. There ''is'' a picture in the NPL http:\/\/www.npg.org.uk\/live\/search\/portrait.asp?LinkID=mp16676&rNo=0&role=art (relating to Stephenson) though it's not actually the 'Horse Runs' picture. There are several pictures in the set. I'll edit the reference. (I assume you'll delete this question.)  +++$+++ :Nevermind - I found it. There ''is'' a picture in the NPL http://www.npg.org.uk/live/search/portrait.asp?LinkID=mp16676&rNo=0&role=art (relating to Stephenson) though it's not actually the 'Horse Runs' picture. There are several pictures in the set. I'll edit the reference. (I assume you'll delete this question.) [[User:DaveRo|DaveRo]] 13:46, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

537816 +++$+++ AlexanderPar +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537816 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-13 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.179096540E09 +++$+++ How could he possibly leave with more troops than he came with? -- +++$+++ How could he possibly leave with more troops than he came with? --[[User:AlexanderPar|AlexanderPar]] 15:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
537817 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537816 +++$+++ 537816 +++$+++ 2007-05-13 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.179097680E09 +++$+++ Our source tell us that Alexander on leaving Susa divided his 17,000 men in two forces, a major one under Alexander and a minor one under Parmenion. The latter took a different road, taking the Thessalian cavalry, the mercenaries, the baggage and the allied troops. These forces regrupped at Persepolis.-- +++$+++ :Our source tell us that Alexander on leaving Susa divided his 17,000 men in two forces, a major one under Alexander and a minor one under Parmenion. The latter took a different road, taking the Thessalian cavalry, the mercenaries, the baggage and the allied troops. These forces regrupped at Persepolis.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

16635 +++$+++ Manning Bartlett +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-07 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.254918120E09 +++$+++ Hi Realkyhick - I know tempers are running hot at [[Mark Levin]], but ALL non-article related discussion is to END. To enforce conduct I'm running on a single warning, then a 24 hour block system. Hence you are getting a warning for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Mark_Levin&diff=318395580&oldid=318395067 this diff]. You're a respected, long-standing editor and I'd really prefer not to block you. Regards  +++$+++ Hi Realkyhick - I know tempers are running hot at [[Mark Levin]], but ALL non-article related discussion is to END. To enforce conduct I'm running on a single warning, then a 24 hour block system. Hence you are getting a warning for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mark_Levin&diff=318395580&oldid=318395067 this diff]. You're a respected, long-standing editor and I'd really prefer not to block you. Regards [[User:Manning Bartlett|Manning]] ([[User talk:Manning Bartlett|talk]]) 05:22, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
16636 +++$+++ Manning Bartlett +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16635 +++$+++ 16635 +++$+++ 2009-10-07 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.254918900E09 +++$+++ Good idea. Go and sleep. Regards,  +++$+++ :Good idea. Go and sleep. Regards, [[User:Manning Bartlett|Manning]] ([[User talk:Manning Bartlett|talk]]) 05:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

540927 +++$+++ Seleukosa +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540927 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 10:26:00 +++$+++ 1.204741560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Seleukosa|Seleukosa]] ([[User talk:Seleukosa|talk]]) 10:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
540928 +++$+++ Megistias +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540927 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.204749780E09 +++$+++ Todor Hristov Simovski is a 100 % questionable source.All and any material ,references and articles based on him must be removed.He is POV and his books are unverifiable.\"Aegean Macedonia\"? The book is nationalistic [http:\/\/e-magaza.ttk.org.tr\/switch.php?file=ProductInfo&cat_id=82&product_id=1447] to say the least and nothing more the Irredentism.How did this get through in wiki.Everything must be removed and appropriate measures be taken.His book is irredendist.[http:\/\/www.gate.net\/~mango\/Summary.htm summary of the book].Immediate purge is needed.The material has been scanned by someone here[http:\/\/s111.photobucket.com\/albums\/n138\/vbb_wiki\/toponyms\/ simovski],obviously some irredendist from fyrom.See Simovski's bio and material from the Book.Clearly material that is trash.Even if this gets closed i have saved the related material.The articles should be deleted and any and all refs with this \"simovski\". +++$+++ ::::Todor Hristov Simovski is a 100 % questionable source.All and any material ,references and articles based on him must be removed.He is POV and his books are unverifiable."Aegean Macedonia"? The book is nationalistic [http://e-magaza.ttk.org.tr/switch.php?file=ProductInfo&cat_id=82&product_id=1447] to say the least and nothing more the Irredentism.How did this get through in wiki.Everything must be removed and appropriate measures be taken.His book is irredendist.[http://www.gate.net/~mango/Summary.htm summary of the book].Immediate purge is needed.The material has been scanned by someone here[http://s111.photobucket.com/albums/n138/vbb_wiki/toponyms/ simovski],obviously some irredendist from fyrom.See Simovski's bio and material from the Book.Clearly material that is trash.Even if this gets closed i have saved the related material.The articles should be deleted and any and all refs with this "simovski".[[User:Megistias|Megistias]] ([[User talk:Megistias|talk]]) 12:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

439680 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ AresAndEnyo +++$+++ 439680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-21 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.166766480E09 +++$+++ Hello!  I am sorry to say that I have closed  your RfA early as there is no chance that you will achieve consensus with two days' worth of contributions. Take a look at [[:Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia]] for ideas about effective contributions.  If you are serious about being an effective editor then you can visit [[:WP:ADOPT]] and ask for a more experienced editor to assist you in learning about Wikipedia.  You can then edit with guidance build your reputation before trying for another RfA in six or eight months' time. Regards,  +++$+++ Hello!  I am sorry to say that I have closed  your RfA early as there is no chance that you will achieve consensus with two days' worth of contributions. Take a look at [[:Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia]] for ideas about effective contributions.  If you are serious about being an effective editor then you can visit [[:WP:ADOPT]] and ask for a more experienced editor to assist you in learning about Wikipedia.  You can then edit with guidance build your reputation before trying for another RfA in six or eight months' time. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 21:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
439681 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ AresAndEnyo +++$+++ 439680 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166959680E09 +++$+++ You need to read the intro material very carefully - no one gets adminship on wikipedia without having spent considerable time and effort in a whole range of  areas of wikipedia!  +++$+++ ::You need to read the intro material very carefully - no one gets adminship on wikipedia without having spent considerable time and effort in a whole range of  areas of wikipedia! [[User talk:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 03:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
439682 +++$+++ AresAndEnyo +++$+++ AresAndEnyo +++$+++ 439680 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.166959980E09 +++$+++ No offence but the original idea of an administrator on wikipedia was that any user that is in good standing and is a regular contributor would have admin status. But It guesses that times change. -- +++$+++ :::No offence but the original idea of an administrator on wikipedia was that any user that is in good standing and is a regular contributor would have admin status. But It guesses that times change. --[[User:AresAndEnyo|AresAndEnyo]] 03:33, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
439683 +++$+++ Orderinchaos78 +++$+++ AresAndEnyo +++$+++ 439680 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166963280E09 +++$+++ I think \"good standing\" and \"regular\" need some time to establish - it's human nature not to trust what\/who one does not know. One suggestion - there's plenty of areas that administrators need help with, and doing them for a period generally gets your name known to a larger audience as a force for good so that when you finally do go for RfA, people remember you and vote for you. There seems to be a set population that vote against anybody on spurious grounds but if you have plenty of well-regarded supporters this is pretty much never a problem.  +++$+++ ::::I think "good standing" and "regular" need some time to establish - it's human nature not to trust what/who one does not know. One suggestion - there's plenty of areas that administrators need help with, and doing them for a period generally gets your name known to a larger audience as a force for good so that when you finally do go for RfA, people remember you and vote for you. There seems to be a set population that vote against anybody on spurious grounds but if you have plenty of well-regarded supporters this is pretty much never a problem. [[User talk:Orderinchaos78|Orderinchaos78]] 04:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
439684 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ AresAndEnyo +++$+++ 439680 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.166960280E09 +++$+++ Not taken - not in the last year has an admin come from 100 edits! -  have a good christmas and beware the turkeys!  +++$+++ ::Not taken - not in the last year has an admin come from 100 edits! -  have a good christmas and beware the turkeys! [[User talk:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 03:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
439685 +++$+++ AresAndEnyo +++$+++ AresAndEnyo +++$+++ 439680 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.166960520E09 +++$+++ I'll try I get final year high school results the 27th (extreamly useful) and university offers - you have a good christmas too -- +++$+++ ::: I'll try I get final year high school results the 27th (extreamly useful) and university offers - you have a good christmas too --[[User:AresAndEnyo|AresAndEnyo]] 03:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
439686 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ AresAndEnyo +++$+++ 439680 +++$+++ 439680 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.166960700E09 +++$+++ Thanks - you have a good start on wikipedia with orderinchaos - he's been through the ropes allright!  +++$+++ : Thanks - you have a good start on wikipedia with orderinchaos - he's been through the ropes allright! [[User talk:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 03:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

278786 +++$+++ Noisalt +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-22 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.248246180E09 +++$+++ I removed the speedy deletion tag you put on [[Blue marble energy]]. The article clearly did not meet that criterion at all. Looking at your talk page you've obviously had a lot of problems with this. Maybe you should refrain from using the CSD templates until you know how to use them correctly. \u2014 +++$+++ I removed the speedy deletion tag you put on [[Blue marble energy]]. The article clearly did not meet that criterion at all. Looking at your talk page you've obviously had a lot of problems with this. Maybe you should refrain from using the CSD templates until you know how to use them correctly. —[[User:Noisalt|Noisalt]] ([[User talk:Noisalt|talk]]) 00:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
278787 +++$+++ Noisalt +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278786 +++$+++ 278786 +++$+++ 2009-07-22 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.248248880E09 +++$+++ The criterion had nothing to do with notability. Read what it said. Speedy deletion is what ruins this site for new users, so I don't have warm feelings for people who misuse it. \u2014 +++$+++ :The criterion had nothing to do with notability. Read what it said. Speedy deletion is what ruins this site for new users, so I don't have warm feelings for people who misuse it. —[[User:Noisalt|Noisalt]] ([[User talk:Noisalt|talk]]) 00:48, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

602671 +++$+++ Anselmocisneros +++$+++ The Hippie +++$+++ 602671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-09 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.189371360E09 +++$+++ Hola, me preguntaste como se traduc\xeda lo anterior, hace mucho. Espero que te sirva, un beso. +++$+++ Hola, me preguntaste como se traducía lo anterior, hace mucho. Espero que te sirva, un beso.[[User:Anselmocisneros|Anselmocisneros]] 13:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
602672 +++$+++ -The Bold Guy- +++$+++ The Hippie +++$+++ 602671 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-22 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.190497800E09 +++$+++ You do great work, you guys fro the WikiProject League of Copyeditors! Since I'm in trouble with the [[Grutte Pier]] article, can you help me with it? (I'm not a native speaker of English, nor writer, and especially my grammar sucks, and so does the grammar of most contributors to that article).  +++$+++ ::You do great work, you guys fro the WikiProject League of Copyeditors! Since I'm in trouble with the [[Grutte Pier]] article, can you help me with it? (I'm not a native speaker of English, nor writer, and especially my grammar sucks, and so does the grammar of most contributors to that article). [[User:-The Bold Guy-|-The Bold Guy-]] 14:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

278790 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-10 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.249930440E09 +++$+++ Hi. Which foreign language Wikipedia is it from? I can't find it. -- +++$+++ Hi. Which foreign language Wikipedia is it from? I can't find it. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 11:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
278791 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278790 +++$+++ 278790 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.249930560E09 +++$+++ When I hovered over the original article, I thought it said that it was on the Indian version of WP, though I could be mistaken. -- +++$+++ :When I hovered over the original article, I thought it said that it was on the Indian version of WP, though I could be mistaken. --[[User:Mhking|mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking#top|talk]]) 11:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
278792 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278790 +++$+++ 278791 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.249930680E09 +++$+++ Ah, thanks. I couldn't find a text string match, but that's not definitive. -- +++$+++ ::Ah, thanks. I couldn't find a text string match, but that's not definitive. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 11:58, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

16647 +++$+++ Carolmc68 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-12 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.258089660E09 +++$+++ Carol McNerney  +++$+++ Carol McNerney [[User:Carolmc68|Carolmc68]] ([[User talk:Carolmc68|talk]]) 21:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
16648 +++$+++ Accounting4Taste +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16647 +++$+++ 16647 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.258092120E09 +++$+++ At her request, apparently nearly simultaneously with this one, I've provided a copy of the deleted material for this user at [[User:Carolmc68\/Sandbox]].   +++$+++ :At her request, apparently nearly simultaneously with this one, I've provided a copy of the deleted material for this user at [[User:Carolmc68/Sandbox]].  [[User:Accounting4Taste|Accounting4Taste]]:<small>[[User talk:Accounting4Taste|talk]]</small> 22:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

264919 +++$+++ Hgilbert +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264919 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-22 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.153592820E09 +++$+++ It's hard to overestimate the fall of PLANS' reputation due to the lack of evidence or witnesses for their court case. One of the organization's board members is both a co-founder and former board member of one of the schools PLANS was suing. Imagine being in that situation and having no evidence to present, or witnesses. They had seven years to present a case, a busy web-site and forum through which they could gather supportive evidence, and had ''nothing'' at the end of it. It wasn't a case of having some supportive evidence, but not enough to win the trial. They had and have nothing. Their claims are without merit, and that's official. Why should they be included in an encyclopedia article?  +++$+++ It's hard to overestimate the fall of PLANS' reputation due to the lack of evidence or witnesses for their court case. One of the organization's board members is both a co-founder and former board member of one of the schools PLANS was suing. Imagine being in that situation and having no evidence to present, or witnesses. They had seven years to present a case, a busy web-site and forum through which they could gather supportive evidence, and had ''nothing'' at the end of it. It wasn't a case of having some supportive evidence, but not enough to win the trial. They had and have nothing. Their claims are without merit, and that's official. Why should they be included in an encyclopedia article? [[User:Hgilbert|Hgilbert]] 11:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
264920 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264919 +++$+++ 264919 +++$+++ 2006-07-22 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.153630500E09 +++$+++ They should be included simply because they are bringing this case. They are an organised group who are publicly criticising Waldorf education and, using the courts to do this. This makes them noteworthy. Even if the case had failed completely, and it is under notice of appeal, they would still be noteworthy. Wikipedia NPOV reports everthing that is noteworthy so a reader gets a 360 degree view of a subject including any current legal or political issues.  +++$+++ :They should be included simply because they are bringing this case. They are an organised group who are publicly criticising Waldorf education and, using the courts to do this. This makes them noteworthy. Even if the case had failed completely, and it is under notice of appeal, they would still be noteworthy. Wikipedia NPOV reports everthing that is noteworthy so a reader gets a 360 degree view of a subject including any current legal or political issues. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 21:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

278797 +++$+++ Eronel189 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-20 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.250764020E09 +++$+++ Every single paragraph is accurately sourced to the Shrimad-Bhagavatam a very important and popular Hindu Book.  Every single paragraph has its own source, so how can you say it is un-sourced or personal research?  I spent hours on this page and made sure I sourced every single thing I wrote. Please let me know.  It is sourced on in every paragraph.  It is much better sourced than Naraka (Buddhism) which barely has any sources.  In this article every thing I wrote I provided a source underneath.  Thank You. +++$+++ Every single paragraph is accurately sourced to the Shrimad-Bhagavatam a very important and popular Hindu Book.  Every single paragraph has its own source, so how can you say it is un-sourced or personal research?  I spent hours on this page and made sure I sourced every single thing I wrote. Please let me know.  It is sourced on in every paragraph.  It is much better sourced than Naraka (Buddhism) which barely has any sources.  In this article every thing I wrote I provided a source underneath.  Thank You.[[User:Eronel189|Eronel189]] ([[User talk:Eronel189|talk]]) 03:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
278798 +++$+++ 89.125.12.127 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278797 +++$+++ 278797 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.250782440E09 +++$+++ It seems that there is a recurring theme on this discussion page. Mhking is be deleting numerous new articles, when in fact there are good reasons to keep them. [[Special:Contributions\/89.125.12.127|89.125.12.127]] ( +++$+++ :It seems that there is a recurring theme on this discussion page. Mhking is be deleting numerous new articles, when in fact there are good reasons to keep them. [[Special:Contributions/89.125.12.127|89.125.12.127]] ([[User talk:89.125.12.127|talk]]) 08:34, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

540946 +++$+++ Prashanthns +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540946 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-14 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.208218920E09 +++$+++ Hello. I dont recollect tagging any recent article as spam. Could you tell me which article you are referring to? THanks.  +++$+++ Hello. I dont recollect tagging any recent article as spam. Could you tell me which article you are referring to? THanks. [[User:Prashanthns|Prashanthns]] ([[User talk:Prashanthns|talk]]) 17:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
540947 +++$+++ Prashanthns +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540946 +++$+++ 540946 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.208219160E09 +++$+++ !! I checked [[\\|that]] article, but dont see any tag left by me in the last 50 edits! Could this be a mistake?  +++$+++ : !! I checked [[\|that]] article, but dont see any tag left by me in the last 50 edits! Could this be a mistake? [[User:Prashanthns|Prashanthns]] ([[User talk:Prashanthns|talk]]) 17:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
540948 +++$+++ Prashanthns +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540946 +++$+++ 540947 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.208219460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for rving that. I see it now. It was on the redirect page of backslash. Most obviously my mistake! This must definitely be by oversight!Was rc patrolling and must've hit the wrong link on Twinkle. Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for rving that. I see it now. It was on the redirect page of backslash. Most obviously my mistake! This must definitely be by oversight!Was rc patrolling and must've hit the wrong link on Twinkle. Thanks again. [[User:Prashanthns|Prashanthns]] ([[User talk:Prashanthns|talk]]) 17:31, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

395993 +++$+++ Hbdragon88 +++$+++ Hbdragon88 +++$+++ 395993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-06 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.210057920E09 +++$+++ Curious, I noticed that White Cat's Davenbelle link had gone cold, and noticed that you had done the deed.  I mean, we have [[WP:RFAR\/HWY]], for instance.  Davenbelle has the strange convention of three separately named parties, which makes it more difficult to remember.  I can remember Cool Cat and Davenbelle fine, but it takes a bit to remember Stereotek's user name, much less type it in correctly with the spacing and puncutation.  +++$+++ Curious, I noticed that White Cat's Davenbelle link had gone cold, and noticed that you had done the deed.  I mean, we have [[WP:RFAR/HWY]], for instance.  Davenbelle has the strange convention of three separately named parties, which makes it more difficult to remember.  I can remember Cool Cat and Davenbelle fine, but it takes a bit to remember Stereotek's user name, much less type it in correctly with the spacing and puncutation. [[User:Hbdragon88|hbdragon88]] ([[User talk:Hbdragon88|talk]]) 00:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
395994 +++$+++ Thebainer +++$+++ Hbdragon88 +++$+++ 395993 +++$+++ 395993 +++$+++ 2008-05-06 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.210065240E09 +++$+++ Redirects should not be sharing the namespace with regular case names. I'm not fond of [[WP:RFAR\/HWY]] either, but at least it's in the shortcut format. See [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration#Renaming_old_cases|this discussion]]. -- +++$+++ :Redirects should not be sharing the namespace with regular case names. I'm not fond of [[WP:RFAR/HWY]] either, but at least it's in the shortcut format. See [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration#Renaming_old_cases|this discussion]]. --[[User:Thebainer|bainer]]&nbsp;([[User_talk:Thebainer|talk]]) 02:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

540952 +++$+++ Hex ten +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-17 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.208492040E09 +++$+++ Regards  +++$+++ Regards [[User:Hex ten|Hex ten]] ([[User talk:Hex ten|talk]]) 21:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
540953 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540952 +++$+++ 540952 +++$+++ 2008-04-18 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.208568780E09 +++$+++ What article was deleted? There was never an article [[Rodolfo Arismendy D' la Parra de Urzaiz y Azlor de Aragon Borbon-Parma]].  +++$+++ :What article was deleted? There was never an article [[Rodolfo Arismendy D' la Parra de Urzaiz y Azlor de Aragon Borbon-Parma]]. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] ([[User talk:Carlossuarez46#top|talk]]) 18:33, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

278810 +++$+++ Glunnbuck +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278810 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-08 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.236508260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Glunnbuck|Glunnbuck]] ([[User talk:Glunnbuck|talk]]) 03:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
278811 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278810 +++$+++ 278810 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.236508380E09 +++$+++ :The characterization you use (i.e., his \"screaming\" as evidence that he is not a pundit among other things) does fly in the face of NPOV. Please seek consensus as opposed to imposing said NPOV. -- +++$+++ * :The characterization you use (i.e., his "screaming" as evidence that he is not a pundit among other things) does fly in the face of NPOV. Please seek consensus as opposed to imposing said NPOV. --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking|talk]]) 03:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

16667 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16667 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-08 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.260321360E09 +++$+++ Hi. The author removed your PROD. Another editor then tagged it db-spam, which I have declined as it is not strongly promotional; but a quick search suggests no notability - do you want to take it to AfD? Regards,  +++$+++ Hi. The author removed your PROD. Another editor then tagged it db-spam, which I have declined as it is not strongly promotional; but a quick search suggests no notability - do you want to take it to AfD? Regards, [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 17:16, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
16668 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16667 +++$+++ 16667 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.260321600E09 +++$+++ No need, someone else [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Binfer|already has]]. Cheers,  +++$+++ *No need, someone else [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binfer|already has]]. Cheers, [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 17:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

540961 +++$+++ Closedmouth +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540961 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-25 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.209165300E09 +++$+++ I'm pretty sure schools don't qualify for A7. -- +++$+++ I'm pretty sure schools don't qualify for A7. --[[User:Closedmouth|Closedmouth]] ([[User talk:Closedmouth|talk]]) 16:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
540962 +++$+++ Closedmouth +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540961 +++$+++ 540961 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.209169200E09 +++$+++ I really have no opinion, I just didn't think it was allowed. People seem to get so pissy when you even suggest deleting a school article, I would never have thought you could A7 one. Not that I care either way. -- +++$+++ :I really have no opinion, I just didn't think it was allowed. People seem to get so pissy when you even suggest deleting a school article, I would never have thought you could A7 one. Not that I care either way. --[[User:Closedmouth|Closedmouth]] ([[User talk:Closedmouth|talk]]) 17:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
540963 +++$+++ Closedmouth +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540961 +++$+++ 540962 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.209169500E09 +++$+++ Hehe, we'll blame it on my lack of knowledge of the US school system and leave it at that eh :P -- +++$+++ ::Hehe, we'll blame it on my lack of knowledge of the US school system and leave it at that eh :P --[[User:Closedmouth|Closedmouth]] ([[User talk:Closedmouth|talk]]) 17:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

16676 +++$+++ Armorbearer777 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-28 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.262053020E09 +++$+++ Has been mentioned on the XXXChurch wikipage for a long time before this deletion proccess.  You seem \"HELLBENT\" to have the mere existence of The [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]] sticken from any mention on Wikipedia, you should refrain from going on a personal attack.  Why don't you try calling the XXX Church main office in Las Vegas?  I think you will find that they are supportive of The [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]].  +++$+++ Has been mentioned on the XXXChurch wikipage for a long time before this deletion proccess.  You seem "HELLBENT" to have the mere existence of The [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]] sticken from any mention on Wikipedia, you should refrain from going on a personal attack.  Why don't you try calling the XXX Church main office in Las Vegas?  I think you will find that they are supportive of The [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]]. [[User:Armorbearer777|Armorbearer777]] ([[User talk:Armorbearer777|talk]]) 18:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
16677 +++$+++ Armorbearer777 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16676 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-28 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.262053020E09 +++$+++ Please stop removing link on WLRY +++$+++ ::Please stop removing link on WLRY[[User:Armorbearer777|Armorbearer777]] ([[User talk:Armorbearer777|talk]]) 18:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
16678 +++$+++ Armorbearer777 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16676 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-28 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.262053380E09 +++$+++ And WCLH and WTGO...  It looks like you are on a personal mission to see that The [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]] is never becomes notible.  Here's an idea, why don't you at least wait until the deletion proccess is final before you go on your mission to completely blot out The [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]] from Wikipedia?  +++$+++ ::: And WCLH and WTGO...  It looks like you are on a personal mission to see that The [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]] is never becomes notible.  Here's an idea, why don't you at least wait until the deletion proccess is final before you go on your mission to completely blot out The [[Full Armor of God Broadcast]] from Wikipedia? [[User:Armorbearer777|Armorbearer777]] ([[User talk:Armorbearer777|talk]]) 18:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

540965 +++$+++ Ali'i +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-25 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.209171360E09 +++$+++ You deleted this page [[Talk:John McCain\/FAQ]], but it should be undeleted. FAQ pages are okay. The mainspace page of the same name was accidentally created by Ferrylodge (and can remain deleted), but the FAQ page should be restored. Mahalo. -- +++$+++ You deleted this page [[Talk:John McCain/FAQ]], but it should be undeleted. FAQ pages are okay. The mainspace page of the same name was accidentally created by Ferrylodge (and can remain deleted), but the FAQ page should be restored. Mahalo. --[[User:Ali'i|Ali&#39;i]] 17:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
540966 +++$+++ Ali'i +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540965 +++$+++ 540965 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.209171900E09 +++$+++ I think FAQ pages may be an exception. See [[Talk:Evolution\/FAQ]] for example. Mahalo. -- +++$+++ :I think FAQ pages may be an exception. See [[Talk:Evolution/FAQ]] for example. Mahalo. --[[User:Ali'i|Ali&#39;i]] 18:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

16679 +++$+++ Armorbearer777 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-29 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.262098200E09 +++$+++ For the record I do appreciate your additude, but I very much disagree with you on the notability of this subject. I realize that it is not a household name, but in the counter culture of Christian Metal it is a very well known show, deserving of modest mention on Wikipedia. In all due respect to such a well established Wikipedian as yourself, I do remember readin something in wikipolicy that said '''\"Article topics are required to be notable, or \"worthy of notice.\" Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things like fame, importance, or the popularity of a topic\u2014although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject'''  TY for your time.  Please help make the article better on my userpage.  I am also working and a couple others too.  Be blessed my good man. Sorry for the conflict.<\/s>  +++$+++ For the record I do appreciate your additude, but I very much disagree with you on the notability of this subject. I realize that it is not a household name, but in the counter culture of Christian Metal it is a very well known show, deserving of modest mention on Wikipedia. In all due respect to such a well established Wikipedian as yourself, I do remember readin something in wikipolicy that said '''"Article topics are required to be notable, or "worthy of notice." Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things like fame, importance, or the popularity of a topic—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject'''  TY for your time.  Please help make the article better on my userpage.  I am also working and a couple others too.  Be blessed my good man. Sorry for the conflict.</s> [[User:Armorbearer777|Armorbearer777]] ([[User talk:Armorbearer777|talk]]) 06:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
16680 +++$+++ Armorbearer777 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16679 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.262100960E09 +++$+++ I re-thunk the way this came out.  Please do read it, but realize that I mean no disrepect to you. But in all honest, I was not the one who put the reference on those pages, I only linked them.  I went and un-did all that you did, but I am going back now and fixing it. I realize that if I am ever going to be able to do anything to help Christian Radio here on Wikipedia, you are someone I want to work with and not against.  Forgive me for my lack of protocal. I hope I can help Christian Radio here on Wikipedia by helping to establish notability of NEW cutting edge forms of digital, internet and mobile Christian broadcasting. Can you help me do this?  Or rather can I help you? Your eternal brother in arms,  +++$+++ ::I re-thunk the way this came out.  Please do read it, but realize that I mean no disrepect to you. But in all honest, I was not the one who put the reference on those pages, I only linked them.  I went and un-did all that you did, but I am going back now and fixing it. I realize that if I am ever going to be able to do anything to help Christian Radio here on Wikipedia, you are someone I want to work with and not against.  Forgive me for my lack of protocal. I hope I can help Christian Radio here on Wikipedia by helping to establish notability of NEW cutting edge forms of digital, internet and mobile Christian broadcasting. Can you help me do this?  Or rather can I help you? Your eternal brother in arms, [[User:Armorbearer777|Armorbearer777]] ([[User talk:Armorbearer777|talk]]) 07:36, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

278824 +++$+++ Diamondsandpearls +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278824 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-26 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.238127240E09 +++$+++ Those are my numerous questions. Not if she is her sister or not. Thank You-- +++$+++ Those are my numerous questions. Not if she is her sister or not. Thank You--[[User:Diamondsandpearls|Diamondsandpearls]] ([[User talk:Diamondsandpearls|talk]]) 21:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
278825 +++$+++ 67.177.195.177 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278824 +++$+++ 278824 +++$+++ 2009-03-29 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.238386020E09 +++$+++ Besides, go online and read the Hartford Courant or the local television stations (WFSB TV 3, WTNH TV8, and WVIT TV 30).  The entire local medial calls it \"UConn,\" no one calls it \"Connecticut.\"  Also, the team's nickname \"Huskies\" only works with \"UConn\" (ie, like the dog who pulls a sled, a \"Yukon Husky\").  If the university was called \"Connecticut,\" wouldn't a more appropriate nickname be something like the \"Nutmeggers\"?  The school is UConn, and I did NOT commit vandalism!  Marty in Boulder,3\/29\/2009 [[Special:Contributions\/67.177.195.177|67.177.195.177]] ( +++$+++ :Besides, go online and read the Hartford Courant or the local television stations (WFSB TV 3, WTNH TV8, and WVIT TV 30).  The entire local medial calls it "UConn," no one calls it "Connecticut."  Also, the team's nickname "Huskies" only works with "UConn" (ie, like the dog who pulls a sled, a "Yukon Husky").  If the university was called "Connecticut," wouldn't a more appropriate nickname be something like the "Nutmeggers"?  The school is UConn, and I did NOT commit vandalism!  Marty in Boulder,3/29/2009 [[Special:Contributions/67.177.195.177|67.177.195.177]] ([[User talk:67.177.195.177|talk]]) 21:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

540969 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-01 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.209687300E09 +++$+++ Is [[Social interaction teaching methods]] article worthy? I'm not sure. - +++$+++ Is [[Social interaction teaching methods]] article worthy? I'm not sure. -[[user:WarthogDemon|<font color="007FFF" face="Arial">'''Warthog'''</font>]][[User_talk:WarthogDemon|<font color="2A52BE" face="Arial">'''Demon'''</font>]] 17:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
540970 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540969 +++$+++ 540969 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.209687900E09 +++$+++ I had my suspicions of that. Done. - +++$+++ :I had my suspicions of that. Done. -[[user:WarthogDemon|<font color="007FFF" face="Arial">'''Warthog'''</font>]][[User_talk:WarthogDemon|<font color="2A52BE" face="Arial">'''Demon'''</font>]] 17:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
540971 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540969 +++$+++ 540970 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.209688260E09 +++$+++ Sounds like this could be a professor or a college student. - +++$+++ ::Sounds like this could be a professor or a college student. -[[user:WarthogDemon|<font color="007FFF" face="Arial">'''Warthog'''</font>]][[User_talk:WarthogDemon|<font color="2A52BE" face="Arial">'''Demon'''</font>]] 17:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

278828 +++$+++ TomCat4680 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-05 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.238978040E09 +++$+++ Hi I saw you mentioned that DirecTV has plans to add MSNBC HD upon launch on [[List of DirecTV channels#Future DirecTV channels]] but the source you referenced has nothing about DirecTV in it, its just about the HD launch itself, so I removed it per [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. Do you have a source that specifically says DirecTV WILL add it upon launch?  +++$+++ Hi I saw you mentioned that DirecTV has plans to add MSNBC HD upon launch on [[List of DirecTV channels#Future DirecTV channels]] but the source you referenced has nothing about DirecTV in it, its just about the HD launch itself, so I removed it per [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. Do you have a source that specifically says DirecTV WILL add it upon launch? [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 17:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
278829 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278828 +++$+++ 278828 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.238979060E09 +++$+++ No worries; I misplaced the original article (which is pretty old in and of itself) -- but in it, it includes MSNBC among HD channels DirecTV would add upon launching. In any event, the article itself is old, and given that many HD channel additions previously promised and announced have been put off by DirecTV (E!, Style, Travel Channel, Hallmark Movie Channel, et.al.), I wouldn't be surprised if they held off on launching until D12 reaches orbit late this summer or early this fall. So, leaving MSNBC off the list is not a problem in my mind.... -- +++$+++ :No worries; I misplaced the original article (which is pretty old in and of itself) -- but in it, it includes MSNBC among HD channels DirecTV would add upon launching. In any event, the article itself is old, and given that many HD channel additions previously promised and announced have been put off by DirecTV (E!, Style, Travel Channel, Hallmark Movie Channel, et.al.), I wouldn't be surprised if they held off on launching until D12 reaches orbit late this summer or early this fall. So, leaving MSNBC off the list is not a problem in my mind.... --[[User:Mhking|mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking|talk]]) 17:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
278830 +++$+++ TomCat4680 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278828 +++$+++ 278829 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.238979180E09 +++$+++ Ok well it'd be a great if it could be confirmed that MSNBC HD will be on DirecTV upon launch. Hey by any chance are you \"DodgerKing\" on any TV forums such as HighDefForums.com, SatelliteGuys.US or DBSTalk.com?  +++$+++ ::Ok well it'd be a great if it could be confirmed that MSNBC HD will be on DirecTV upon launch. Hey by any chance are you "DodgerKing" on any TV forums such as HighDefForums.com, SatelliteGuys.US or DBSTalk.com? [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 17:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
278831 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278828 +++$+++ 278830 +++$+++ 2009-04-05 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.238981100E09 +++$+++ No, I'm not DodgerKing...I go as mhking on all three forums, though I am more quiet than I used to be on those forums.... -- +++$+++ :::No, I'm not DodgerKing...I go as mhking on all three forums, though I am more quiet than I used to be on those forums.... --[[User:Mhking|mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking|talk]]) 18:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

540973 +++$+++ Tiamut +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-02 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.209749460E09 +++$+++ Hi there. There is a discussion at [[Talk:Aqaba]] pertaining to the need for a disambig page there. You replaced the disambig with the main article without contributing to that discussion. I was wondering if you could consider reinstating the change that was made, or explaining why your solution is preferable. Two admins help was necessary to effect the change in the first place and I don't know how to restore it without making a bigger mess. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi there. There is a discussion at [[Talk:Aqaba]] pertaining to the need for a disambig page there. You replaced the disambig with the main article without contributing to that discussion. I was wondering if you could consider reinstating the change that was made, or explaining why your solution is preferable. Two admins help was necessary to effect the change in the first place and I don't know how to restore it without making a bigger mess. Thanks. [[User:Tiamut|<b><font color="#B93B8F">T</font><font color="#800000">i</font><font color="#B93B8F">a</font><font color="#800000">m</font><font color="#B93B8F">u</font><font color="#800000">t</font></b>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]</sup> 10:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
540974 +++$+++ Tiamut +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 540973 +++$+++ 540973 +++$+++ 2008-05-02 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.209786660E09 +++$+++ I'll address you comment at the talk there. Cheers.  +++$+++ :I'll address you comment at the talk there. Cheers. [[User:Tiamut|<b><font color="#B93B8F">T</font><font color="#800000">i</font><font color="#B93B8F">a</font><font color="#800000">m</font><font color="#B93B8F">u</font><font color="#800000">t</font></b>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]</sup> 20:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

533027 +++$+++ Stevenc317 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-10 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.200001800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Stevenc317|Stevenc317]] ([[User talk:Stevenc317|talk]]) 13:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
533028 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533027 +++$+++ 533027 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.200008280E09 +++$+++ An editor marked it as a csd. Having another look at the present form, I think the article is fine. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : An editor marked it as a csd. Having another look at the present form, I think the article is fine. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

278834 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278834 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-09 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.239260400E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add commentary or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles{{#if:Life on Mars (U.S. TV series)|, as you did to [[:Life on Mars (U.S. TV series)]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.  {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npov2 -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add commentary or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles{{#if:Life on Mars (U.S. TV series)|, as you did to [[:Life on Mars (U.S. TV series)]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.  {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> [[User:Mhking|mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking|talk]]) 00:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
278835 +++$+++ Mdriver1981 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278834 +++$+++ 278834 +++$+++ 2009-04-09 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.239260640E09 +++$+++ I will do as I wish.  This is a free country. +++$+++ :I will do as I wish.  This is a free country.[[User:Mdriver1981|Mdriver1981]] ([[User talk:Mdriver1981|talk]]) 00:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

90163 +++$+++ Enigmaticland +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-02 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.246602960E09 +++$+++ As far as I understand, as the crisis that is taking place after coup in Honduras has not come to an end, the information in that section could undergo changes as international media and social organizations overcome the limitations in communication in the country. I think that this situation warrants placing the template. If my perception is not correct, I have no problem with removing the template. Greetings! --  +++$+++ As far as I understand, as the crisis that is taking place after coup in Honduras has not come to an end, the information in that section could undergo changes as international media and social organizations overcome the limitations in communication in the country. I think that this situation warrants placing the template. If my perception is not correct, I have no problem with removing the template. Greetings! -- [[User:Enigmaticland|Enigmaticland]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticland|talk]]) 23:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
90164 +++$+++ Enigmaticland +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90163 +++$+++ 90163 +++$+++ 2009-07-03 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.246674120E09 +++$+++ Well, it seems I didn't understood the proper using of the template. I will immediately remove it from the article, thanks for the clarification. --  +++$+++ :Well, it seems I didn't understood the proper using of the template. I will immediately remove it from the article, thanks for the clarification. -- [[User:Enigmaticland|Enigmaticland]] ([[User talk:Enigmaticland|talk]]) 19:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

16693 +++$+++ 99.156.69.78 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16693 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-23 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.264305840E09 +++$+++ Hi Realkyhick, I just wanted to let you know that I removed the speedy delete template you placed here because it turns out the subject has been well covered. Thanks for all your good efforts--I've had a few speedies overturned in my past. Best, [[Special:Contributions\/99.156.69.78|99.156.69.78]] ( +++$+++ Hi Realkyhick, I just wanted to let you know that I removed the speedy delete template you placed here because it turns out the subject has been well covered. Thanks for all your good efforts--I've had a few speedies overturned in my past. Best, [[Special:Contributions/99.156.69.78|99.156.69.78]] ([[User talk:99.156.69.78|talk]]) 20:04, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
16694 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16693 +++$+++ 16693 +++$+++ 2010-01-23 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.264306020E09 +++$+++ For the record, I stand by the removal of the {{tl|db-person}} tag but agree that the article, as it was when you tagged it did not make an assertion of significance. All the best,  +++$+++ *For the record, I stand by the removal of the {{tl|db-person}} tag but agree that the article, as it was when you tagged it did not make an assertion of significance. All the best, [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ Mitchell'''</font>]] | [[User_Talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">fancy a chat? </font>]]  20:07, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

278839 +++$+++ Kingpin13 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-04 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.241463240E09 +++$+++ Hi, just letting you know I've removed your speedy template from [[FES Matriculation School]] because you requested deletion under A7, which does not apply to schools. Cheers -  +++$+++ Hi, just letting you know I've removed your speedy template from [[FES Matriculation School]] because you requested deletion under A7, which does not apply to schools. Cheers - [[User:Kingpin13|Kingpin]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Kingpin13|13]]</sup> ([[User talk:Kingpin13|talk]]) 11:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
278840 +++$+++ Kingpin13 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278839 +++$+++ 278839 +++$+++ 2009-05-04 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.241463780E09 +++$+++ A commmon action to take would be merging this into the town that the school is in. However, the article doesn't reveal it's location. I'd suggest a [[WP:PROD|prod]] (for little content) and if that gets removed, either [[WP:AfD|AfD]] or follow [[Wikipedia:Notability_(local_interests)#If_the_notability_of_an_existing_local_interest_article_is_questioned|this]]. -  +++$+++ :A commmon action to take would be merging this into the town that the school is in. However, the article doesn't reveal it's location. I'd suggest a [[WP:PROD|prod]] (for little content) and if that gets removed, either [[WP:AfD|AfD]] or follow [[Wikipedia:Notability_(local_interests)#If_the_notability_of_an_existing_local_interest_article_is_questioned|this]]. - [[User:Kingpin13|Kingpin]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Kingpin13|13]]</sup> ([[User talk:Kingpin13|talk]]) 12:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

16696 +++$+++ Spongefrog +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16696 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-28 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.264724880E09 +++$+++ Hi. I've removed the PROD you added to [[Cockroach (book)]], as I think it just meets [[WP:Notability (books)]] (I've found some sources, and am looking for more). I'll admit, the state you nominated it in was worth deletion, but I plan to improve the article a bit further. Of course, take it to AfD of you object to the removal. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi. I've removed the PROD you added to [[Cockroach (book)]], as I think it just meets [[WP:Notability (books)]] (I've found some sources, and am looking for more). I'll admit, the state you nominated it in was worth deletion, but I plan to improve the article a bit further. Of course, take it to AfD of you object to the removal. Thanks, [[User:Spongefrog|<font color="#004225" face="High Tower Text">'''Lord Spongefrog''',</font>]] [[User talk:Spongefrog#top|<font color="blue" face="High Tower Text">(I am Czar of all Russias!)</font>]] 16:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
16697 +++$+++ Spongefrog +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16696 +++$+++ 16696 +++$+++ 2010-01-28 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.264731300E09 +++$+++ Ah, good. I found a thing review something called [[Quill & Quire]], but nothing else apart from that. I'll try and integrate them into a reception section later,  +++$+++ :Ah, good. I found a thing review something called [[Quill & Quire]], but nothing else apart from that. I'll try and integrate them into a reception section later, [[User:Spongefrog|<font color="#004225" face="High Tower Text">'''Lord Spongefrog''',</font>]] [[User talk:Spongefrog#top|<font color="blue" face="High Tower Text">(I am Czar of all Russias!)</font>]] 18:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

278841 +++$+++ Decltype +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-04 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.241465340E09 +++$+++ In fact, I think this is not even close to being an A7 candidate, and I advise you to be more judicious in the future. <tt> +++$+++ In fact, I think this is not even close to being an A7 candidate, and I advise you to be more judicious in the future. <tt>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</tt> ([[User talk:Decltype|talk]]) 12:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
278842 +++$+++ Werldwayd +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278841 +++$+++ 278841 +++$+++ 2009-05-04 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.241476020E09 +++$+++ I would have much preferred a more lengthy process for editing the article concerned after discussions rather than rush comments by colleague [[User:decltype]]. And I certainly wouldn't have approved deleting the tag without further discussions. Tags should stay until conflicts are resolved. In any case, now that colleague ([[User:Mhking]] has referred it to deletion, let's have the comments there at http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Kristyan_Ferrer and hopefully the [[Kristyan Ferrer]] article can be saved as what's at issue is a notable actor in a majour role in an award-winning majour movie [[Sin Nombre (2009 film)]]  +++$+++ :I would have much preferred a more lengthy process for editing the article concerned after discussions rather than rush comments by colleague [[User:decltype]]. And I certainly wouldn't have approved deleting the tag without further discussions. Tags should stay until conflicts are resolved. In any case, now that colleague ([[User:Mhking]] has referred it to deletion, let's have the comments there at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kristyan_Ferrer and hopefully the [[Kristyan Ferrer]] article can be saved as what's at issue is a notable actor in a majour role in an award-winning majour movie [[Sin Nombre (2009 film)]] [[User:Werldwayd|werldwayd]] ([[User talk:Werldwayd|talk]]) 15:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
278843 +++$+++ Decltype +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278841 +++$+++ 278842 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.241527440E09 +++$+++ What \"rush comments\" are you referring to? I was merely pointing out that the article was not suitable for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]]. Either way, a week should be more than enough to improve the article. <tt> +++$+++ :: What "rush comments" are you referring to? I was merely pointing out that the article was not suitable for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]]. Either way, a week should be more than enough to improve the article. <tt>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</tt> ([[User talk:Decltype|talk]]) 05:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

46474 +++$+++ Anarchangel +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46474 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-15 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.247645400E09 +++$+++ You are right; I was mistaken. You undertook a short discussion on the subject. Try [[Talk:Fascism]] or [[Talk:Sarah Palin]] if you laboring under the mistaken impression that your discussion sprints to AfD are a thorough discussion. However, ANI was not at that time a threat, it was a promise. AfD without discussion is intolerable. AfD with a short discussion is tolerable, but not good form. The discussion was just a rehash of what was said on the revert summaries, and your actions were similar to AfDing as edit war; you had very little to say in the discussion, and your decision to AfD was unilateral, and entirely without consensus. I have no reason to believe you have learned from your mistakes; I expect we will be crossing paths again.  +++$+++ You are right; I was mistaken. You undertook a short discussion on the subject. Try [[Talk:Fascism]] or [[Talk:Sarah Palin]] if you laboring under the mistaken impression that your discussion sprints to AfD are a thorough discussion. However, ANI was not at that time a threat, it was a promise. AfD without discussion is intolerable. AfD with a short discussion is tolerable, but not good form. The discussion was just a rehash of what was said on the revert summaries, and your actions were similar to AfDing as edit war; you had very little to say in the discussion, and your decision to AfD was unilateral, and entirely without consensus. I have no reason to believe you have learned from your mistakes; I expect we will be crossing paths again. [[User:Anarchangel|Anarchangel]] ([[User talk:Anarchangel|talk]]) 01:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
46475 +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46474 +++$+++ 46474 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.247646540E09 +++$+++ My reply [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Anarchangel&diff=302148029&oldid=301749743 here]. ''' +++$+++ :My reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anarchangel&diff=302148029&oldid=301749743 here]. '''[[User:Artichoker|<span style="color:#064">Artichoker</span>]]'''<sup>['''[[User talk:Artichoker|<span style="color:#000">talk</span>]]''']</sup> 01:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
46476 +++$+++ Zappernapper +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46474 +++$+++ 46475 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.247692620E09 +++$+++ i have commented on anarchangel's talk page and am just letting you know, happy editing! --&#65279; +++$+++ ::i have commented on anarchangel's talk page and am just letting you know, happy editing! --&#65279;[[User:Zappernapper|ΖαππερΝαππερ]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Zappernapper|Babel]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Zappernapper|Alexandria]]</sub> 14:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

278846 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-05 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.241592540E09 +++$+++ Friendly suggestion: Nobody can really check speedies properly at the rate you are going., though you are not making many mistakes. Twinkle is an aid in doing the mechanics, not a substitute for thinking--and , when appropriate, doing a preliminary search. It might add some balance if you did some other sort of editing also.  ''' +++$+++ Friendly suggestion: Nobody can really check speedies properly at the rate you are going., though you are not making many mistakes. Twinkle is an aid in doing the mechanics, not a substitute for thinking--and , when appropriate, doing a preliminary search. It might add some balance if you did some other sort of editing also.  '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 23:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
278847 +++$+++ Paul Erik +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278846 +++$+++ 278846 +++$+++ 2009-05-13 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.242210720E09 +++$+++ I declined the A7 speedy you placed on [[Andrea Crisanti]], an award-winning production designer. <font face=\"Comic sans MS\"> +++$+++ : I declined the A7 speedy you placed on [[Andrea Crisanti]], an award-winning production designer. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 03:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

614453 +++$+++ Wobble +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614453 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-11 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.134308760E09 +++$+++ Hello. Would you have a source for this statement: ''Please note that Brythonic territory extended north of the Forth and Clyde: which is how Dumbarton got its name, as well as the Manaw Gododdin being up in the Stirling area''? [[User:Mais oui|Mais oui]] keeps changing the Brython\/Briton articles' definitions to exclude Scotland\/Picts (and inserting that north of the Forth\/Clyde was not British\/Brythonic). I have asked him for some references but he has not produced any. It would be nice to have some sort of reference for this as it's getting ammended regularly now.  +++$+++ Hello. Would you have a source for this statement: ''Please note that Brythonic territory extended north of the Forth and Clyde: which is how Dumbarton got its name, as well as the Manaw Gododdin being up in the Stirling area''? [[User:Mais oui|Mais oui]] keeps changing the Brython/Briton articles' definitions to exclude Scotland/Picts (and inserting that north of the Forth/Clyde was not British/Brythonic). I have asked him for some references but he has not produced any. It would be nice to have some sort of reference for this as it's getting ammended regularly now. [[User:Wobble|Alun]] 05:46, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
614454 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614453 +++$+++ 614453 +++$+++ 2005-12-11 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.134327660E09 +++$+++ Some clarification of both POVs is needed, will try to improve the [[Brython]] article. ... +++$+++ :Some clarification of both POVs is needed, will try to improve the [[Brython]] article. ...[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]] 11:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

16704 +++$+++ A Nobody +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-09 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.265773860E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors{{#if:|, as you did on [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa1 --> -- +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors{{#if:|, as you did on [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa1 --> --[[User:A Nobody|A Nobody]]<sup>''[[User talk:A Nobody|My talk]]''</sup> 19:51, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
16705 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.265774160E09 +++$+++ Welcome page? I've been here nearly four years. I don't think I need a welcome message, especially from someone who has been blocked several times. -  +++$+++ :Welcome page? I've been here nearly four years. I don't think I need a welcome message, especially from someone who has been blocked several times. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 19:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
16706 +++$+++ Cube lurker +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16705 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.265774400E09 +++$+++ However it does appear that you should re-read some policy pages.  I'd recomend you refactor your comment.  And for the record I have no block record.-- +++$+++ ::However it does appear that you should re-read some policy pages.  I'd recomend you refactor your comment.  And for the record I have no block record.--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 20:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
16707 +++$+++ Cube lurker +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16706 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.265775780E09 +++$+++ (Reply) Yes a templated message is frowned upon by WP:DTTR, however your \"editors to be executed\" was vastly uncivil.  \"He did it first\" is not an mature defense for your own poor behaviour.  As I said, I'd recomend you refactor your comment.-- +++$+++ :::(Reply) Yes a templated message is frowned upon by WP:DTTR, however your "editors to be executed" was vastly uncivil.  "He did it first" is not an mature defense for your own poor behaviour.  As I said, I'd recomend you refactor your comment.--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 20:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
16708 +++$+++ Cube lurker +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16707 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.265776200E09 +++$+++ (Reply) Clearly not a funny joke.  Which is why I suggested you take the step of realizing this and refactoring it.  I have no means to compel you to do this, but I think it's the right thing to do.-- +++$+++ ::::(Reply) Clearly not a funny joke.  Which is why I suggested you take the step of realizing this and refactoring it.  I have no means to compel you to do this, but I think it's the right thing to do.--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 20:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
16709 +++$+++ Cube lurker +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16708 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.265785920E09 +++$+++ I was using the word refactor as an attempt at being tactful.  I had hoped you were the type of person who would consider their words and either change or remove them in a way that would make them more palatable.  However obviously you've chosen your path here.-- +++$+++ :::::I was using the word refactor as an attempt at being tactful.  I had hoped you were the type of person who would consider their words and either change or remove them in a way that would make them more palatable.  However obviously you've chosen your path here.--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 23:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
16710 +++$+++ Cube lurker +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16709 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.265786940E09 +++$+++ Perhaps I do have to clarify although it seems self explanatory to me.  If anyone thought you meant that as a threat of actual violence you'd have been indefed before you could have refreshed the page.  What it is though is uncivil and inflammatory.  When you're in a heated discussion and you make a joking post that the other party in the arguement should be executed, it's a verbal slap in the face to that person.  It's not lessening the heat, it's stirring it up.  It's the opposite of a collaborative working environment.-- +++$+++ ::::::Perhaps I do have to clarify although it seems self explanatory to me.  If anyone thought you meant that as a threat of actual violence you'd have been indefed before you could have refreshed the page.  What it is though is uncivil and inflammatory.  When you're in a heated discussion and you make a joking post that the other party in the arguement should be executed, it's a verbal slap in the face to that person.  It's not lessening the heat, it's stirring it up.  It's the opposite of a collaborative working environment.--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 23:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
16711 +++$+++ Jack Merridew +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.265775000E09 +++$+++ '''Cough''' \u2014 [[WP:DTTR]]. Sincerely,  +++$+++ * '''Cough''' — [[WP:DTTR]]. Sincerely, [[User:Jack Merridew|Jack Merridew]] 20:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
16712 +++$+++ Mecanismo +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.266020340E09 +++$+++ Please read [[Wikipedia:Notability (music)]] before marking band articles for speedy deletion --  +++$+++ * Please read [[Wikipedia:Notability (music)]] before marking band articles for speedy deletion -- [[User:Mecanismo|Mecanismo]] | [[User talk:Mecanismo|Talk]] 16:19, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
16713 +++$+++ Mecanismo +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16712 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.266020880E09 +++$+++ If your tagging of the [[Sugarman Three]] article is any indication of how you've tagged that many articles you've claimed then I believe that if you had read the notability guidelines and had a grasp on the criteria that are there to guide those decisions then you clearly wouldn't have tagged that many.  So once again please do read the notability criteria before tagging any article that crosses your path. --  +++$+++ :*If your tagging of the [[Sugarman Three]] article is any indication of how you've tagged that many articles you've claimed then I believe that if you had read the notability guidelines and had a grasp on the criteria that are there to guide those decisions then you clearly wouldn't have tagged that many.  So once again please do read the notability criteria before tagging any article that crosses your path. -- [[User:Mecanismo|Mecanismo]] | [[User talk:Mecanismo|Talk]] 16:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
16714 +++$+++ Mecanismo +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16713 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.266021480E09 +++$+++ No, you've demonstrating that you don't know the basic aspects behind the notability guideline and repeating it like a mantra while desperately avoiding to back up your actions while launching absurd personal attacks will not make you understand the notability criterias.  So please at least try to justify your own actions.  And on a side note, stop talking in plural as you only speak for yourself. --  +++$+++ ::* No, you've demonstrating that you don't know the basic aspects behind the notability guideline and repeating it like a mantra while desperately avoiding to back up your actions while launching absurd personal attacks will not make you understand the notability criterias.  So please at least try to justify your own actions.  And on a side note, stop talking in plural as you only speak for yourself. -- [[User:Mecanismo|Mecanismo]] | [[User talk:Mecanismo|Talk]] 16:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
16715 +++$+++ Mecanismo +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16714 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.266022920E09 +++$+++ How exactly am I \"evading the requirements\" if they are being presented where they should be presented, which is the article's talk page?  Don't you even understand that?  And I've contacted you so that you could at least take a look at the notability criteria in order for you to avoid doing a poor job at tagging articles for deletion.  Why you've suddenly reacted with a series of absurd personal attacks and became defensive about this issue is a mystery to me. So if you feel insecure regarding the rules set in place to manage wikipedia's content then please stop posting personal attacks and invest 2 to 3 minutes at least learning the basic rules.  And finally, your accusation of me being attacking you personally is absurd, particularly when considering your comments on [[Sugarman Three]]'s talk page.  Are they supposed to be a threat? --  +++$+++ :::: How exactly am I "evading the requirements" if they are being presented where they should be presented, which is the article's talk page?  Don't you even understand that?  And I've contacted you so that you could at least take a look at the notability criteria in order for you to avoid doing a poor job at tagging articles for deletion.  Why you've suddenly reacted with a series of absurd personal attacks and became defensive about this issue is a mystery to me. So if you feel insecure regarding the rules set in place to manage wikipedia's content then please stop posting personal attacks and invest 2 to 3 minutes at least learning the basic rules.  And finally, your accusation of me being attacking you personally is absurd, particularly when considering your comments on [[Sugarman Three]]'s talk page.  Are they supposed to be a threat? -- [[User:Mecanismo|Mecanismo]] | [[User talk:Mecanismo|Talk]] 17:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
16716 +++$+++ Mecanismo +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16715 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.266023640E09 +++$+++ Are you even following [[Sugarman Three]]'s talk page?  No one needs to duplicate that talk page discussion on your personal talk page.  And your \"blowing this out of proportion\" bit is amusing, to say the least.  But please be my guest and please do report me to the admins.  Yet, then don't be too disappointed when they inform you that your accusation, whatever it may be, is baseless at best. --  +++$+++ ::::* Are you even following [[Sugarman Three]]'s talk page?  No one needs to duplicate that talk page discussion on your personal talk page.  And your "blowing this out of proportion" bit is amusing, to say the least.  But please be my guest and please do report me to the admins.  Yet, then don't be too disappointed when they inform you that your accusation, whatever it may be, is baseless at best. -- [[User:Mecanismo|Mecanismo]] | [[User talk:Mecanismo|Talk]] 17:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
16717 +++$+++ Mecanismo +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16704 +++$+++ 16716 +++$+++ 2010-02-12 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.266040440E09 +++$+++ I don't have any problem with that.  Yet, I would like you explain what has been \"blown out of proportion\".  That statement is odd, to say the least. --  +++$+++ :::::* I don't have any problem with that.  Yet, I would like you explain what has been "blown out of proportion".  That statement is odd, to say the least. -- [[User:Mecanismo|Mecanismo]] | [[User talk:Mecanismo|Talk]] 21:54, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

264928 +++$+++ Hgilbert +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-03 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.154634600E09 +++$+++ How about this: \"Real science and medicine vs. Anthroposophical quack science and medicine. Sharing of Waldorf horror stories.\" That sounds like a campaign to discredit anthroposophy and Waldorf, but you added it to the PLANS web-site. I have repeatedly referred you to the criteria for use of organizations' own web-sites as sources of material, which include the requirement that this be for self-descriptions, and not belittlement (or praise) of third-parties. Dan Dugan's descriptions of his own work may be cited, but not in a way that comments on third-parties. I asked, \"Is it hate-filled, prejudicial or simply obviously subjective?\" Please consider Wikipedia guidelines and not just your own prejudices.  +++$+++ How about this: "Real science and medicine vs. Anthroposophical quack science and medicine. Sharing of Waldorf horror stories." That sounds like a campaign to discredit anthroposophy and Waldorf, but you added it to the PLANS web-site. I have repeatedly referred you to the criteria for use of organizations' own web-sites as sources of material, which include the requirement that this be for self-descriptions, and not belittlement (or praise) of third-parties. Dan Dugan's descriptions of his own work may be cited, but not in a way that comments on third-parties. I asked, "Is it hate-filled, prejudicial or simply obviously subjective?" Please consider Wikipedia guidelines and not just your own prejudices. [[User:Hgilbert|Hgilbert]] 12:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
264929 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264928 +++$+++ 264928 +++$+++ 2006-08-03 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.154671620E09 +++$+++ I did not add these words to the PLANS website. I have no contact with PLANS. PLANS is a skeptic site and the language you quote is strong but not offensive to a most people. PLANS is cited as evidence of a balancing point of view,  Very little of its content is present in the Wikipedia article. +++$+++ :I did not add these words to the PLANS website. I have no contact with PLANS. PLANS is a skeptic site and the language you quote is strong but not offensive to a most people. PLANS is cited as evidence of a balancing point of view,  Very little of its content is present in the Wikipedia article.[[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 23:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

278851 +++$+++ Salemmaman +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-08 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.244524020E09 +++$+++ I've gone through the trouble of posting just a few of the many sources of news stories on KTN both on your deletion page and my talk page. Please respond at your convenience. +++$+++ I've gone through the trouble of posting just a few of the many sources of news stories on KTN both on your deletion page and my talk page. Please respond at your convenience.[[User:Salemmaman|Salemmaman]] ([[User talk:Salemmaman|talk]]) 22:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
278852 +++$+++ Salemmaman +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278851 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.244618400E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your help in this issue, thanks for requesting a speedy end to the deletion process. +++$+++ :::I appreciate your help in this issue, thanks for requesting a speedy end to the deletion process.[[User:Salemmaman|Salemmaman]] ([[User talk:Salemmaman|talk]]) 00:20, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

594131 +++$+++ Sam Spade +++$+++ Sam Spade +++$+++ 594131 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-25 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.159194300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade]] 07:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
594132 +++$+++ MadMax +++$+++ Sam Spade +++$+++ 594131 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-27 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.159344060E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry to hear about that Mr. Spade. I'm certainly grateful for the advice however. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :*I'm sorry to hear about that Mr. Spade. I'm certainly grateful for the advice however. Thanks again. [[User:MadMax|MadMax]] 01:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

278855 +++$+++ RavenRawr +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-19 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.245476880E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:RavenRawr|RavenRawr]] ([[User talk:RavenRawr|talk]]) 22:48, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
278856 +++$+++ RavenRawr +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278855 +++$+++ 278855 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.245479460E09 +++$+++ a further edit has been made offering 2 new websites (both credible also) which prove cridt to steve p miller.-- +++$+++ :a further edit has been made offering 2 new websites (both credible also) which prove cridt to steve p miller.--[[User:RavenRawr|RavenRawr]] ([[User talk:RavenRawr|talk]]) 23:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

278857 +++$+++ Melonite +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-20 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.245552180E09 +++$+++ It is a well known story in Wales, albeit very compelling to be a hoax, but Thomas The Conquerer is well documented in Welsh history.  +++$+++ It is a well known story in Wales, albeit very compelling to be a hoax, but Thomas The Conquerer is well documented in Welsh history. [[User:Melonite|//Melonite]] ([[User talk:Melonite|talk]]) 19:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
278858 +++$+++ Melonite +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278857 +++$+++ 278857 +++$+++ 2009-06-20 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.245552300E09 +++$+++ Only Joking ;-) - Totally agree with the CSD   +++$+++ : Only Joking ;-) - Totally agree with the CSD  [[User:Melonite|//Melonite]] ([[User talk:Melonite|talk]]) 19:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

221239 +++$+++ Sunil060902 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221239 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-22 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.208902200E09 +++$+++ best,  +++$+++ best, [[User:Sunil060902|Sunil060902]] ([[User talk:Sunil060902|talk]]) 15:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
221240 +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ Nick Cooper +++$+++ 221239 +++$+++ 221239 +++$+++ 2008-04-22 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.208904660E09 +++$+++ OK, that's a fair point. It is true, though, that most disused stations pages seem to favour the \"if it was still open\" text, e.g. [[Down Street tube station|Down Street]], [[Brompton Road tube station|Brompton Road]], etc.  +++$+++ : OK, that's a fair point. It is true, though, that most disused stations pages seem to favour the "if it was still open" text, e.g. [[Down Street tube station|Down Street]], [[Brompton Road tube station|Brompton Road]], etc. [[User:Nick Cooper|Nick Cooper]] ([[User talk:Nick Cooper#top|talk]]) 15:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

527074 +++$+++ Cefaro +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-18 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.219043280E09 +++$+++ saying that the image is a exact duplicate from Commons and will be deleted unless an administrator protect it. Can you do that for me? What do you recommend I should do in the future?. Thanks.-- +++$+++ saying that the image is a exact duplicate from Commons and will be deleted unless an administrator protect it. Can you do that for me? What do you recommend I should do in the future?. Thanks.--[[User:Cefaro|Cefaro]] ([[User talk:Cefaro|talk]]) 00:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
527075 +++$+++ Cefaro +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527074 +++$+++ 527074 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.219048140E09 +++$+++ Got it!, thanks a lot -- +++$+++ *Got it!, thanks a lot --[[User:Cefaro|Cefaro]] ([[User talk:Cefaro|talk]]) 01:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
527076 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527074 +++$+++ 527074 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.219048560E09 +++$+++ In fact you uploaded the Commons one too.<span style=\"font-family: verdana;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :In fact you uploaded the Commons one too.<span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 01:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

16718 +++$+++ Mecanismo +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-14 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.266178080E09 +++$+++ You seem to be confused.  The only problem that occurred was due to your overzealous need to speedy-delete articles even though you don't have a clue about what you are reading or even what you are doing, aggravated by your complete lack of knowledge regarding wikipedia's notability criteria.  If that wasn't bad enough, the insulting stance you took on this whole issue, with your absurd conspiracy accusations, pathetic appeals to authority, laughable threats and your childish nagging of multiple editors to try to compel them to cover your mistakes make me wonder why you waste your time editing wikipedia.  You are an appallingly poor wikipedian who, unknowing or not, is actively contributing to denigrate wikipedia's reputation by failing at fundamental aspects as neglecting wikipedia's most basic rules and violating wikipedia's guiding principles.  If instead of me you were fortunate to perform the same incompetent actions on an article created by a newbie then, as even you can understand (but either way should understand), that newbie would be left wondering why wikipedia would be so oppressive and authoritarian but also what was the point of the so called [[Wikipedia:Be bold|be bold]] policy. That newbie would never edit a wikipedia article again, thanks to your incompetence.  You are continually doing a disservice to wikipedia and wikipedia would be a lot better if you just wasted your time elsewhere.  People actually use wikipedia in a productive manner.  Try at least to understand that. --  +++$+++ You seem to be confused.  The only problem that occurred was due to your overzealous need to speedy-delete articles even though you don't have a clue about what you are reading or even what you are doing, aggravated by your complete lack of knowledge regarding wikipedia's notability criteria.  If that wasn't bad enough, the insulting stance you took on this whole issue, with your absurd conspiracy accusations, pathetic appeals to authority, laughable threats and your childish nagging of multiple editors to try to compel them to cover your mistakes make me wonder why you waste your time editing wikipedia.  You are an appallingly poor wikipedian who, unknowing or not, is actively contributing to denigrate wikipedia's reputation by failing at fundamental aspects as neglecting wikipedia's most basic rules and violating wikipedia's guiding principles.  If instead of me you were fortunate to perform the same incompetent actions on an article created by a newbie then, as even you can understand (but either way should understand), that newbie would be left wondering why wikipedia would be so oppressive and authoritarian but also what was the point of the so called [[Wikipedia:Be bold|be bold]] policy. That newbie would never edit a wikipedia article again, thanks to your incompetence.  You are continually doing a disservice to wikipedia and wikipedia would be a lot better if you just wasted your time elsewhere.  People actually use wikipedia in a productive manner.  Try at least to understand that. -- [[User:Mecanismo|Mecanismo]] | [[User talk:Mecanismo|Talk]] 12:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
16719 +++$+++ Mecanismo +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16718 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-15 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.266235740E09 +++$+++ You may paste as many templates as you wish, you can even whine on other user's talk page as you like and you can even pull your victimization act along with your sanctimonious bit on how to edit wikipedia but that won't cover your appalling shortcomings as a wikipedia editor.  If you didn't want me to reply to you then you wouldn't post that insulting, hypocritical, passive-aggressive complain on my talk page.  Did you expected that everyone you send that nonsense to will simply sit idle?  So stop wasting your time bothering me on my talk page and, if you intend to still waste your time blindly and ignorantly ruining other user's entries then you at least must try to a) educate yourself at least about wikipedia basic policies and guidelines, b) drop your attempts at masquerading yourself as some sort of authority in wikipedia, c) stop with these idiotic passive-aggressive stunts, and d) cut out your whiny victimization act.  You, as any regular wikipedian, should understand that wikipedia is supposed to serve as a communication channel where everyone can and should not only access information but also share it.  It is not, nor should it be used as venue to showcase petty behaviour and make up for whatever frustrations you have with your life.  So stop bothering me and at least try to be a decent wikipedian for a change.  And --  +++$+++ :* You may paste as many templates as you wish, you can even whine on other user's talk page as you like and you can even pull your victimization act along with your sanctimonious bit on how to edit wikipedia but that won't cover your appalling shortcomings as a wikipedia editor.  If you didn't want me to reply to you then you wouldn't post that insulting, hypocritical, passive-aggressive complain on my talk page.  Did you expected that everyone you send that nonsense to will simply sit idle?  So stop wasting your time bothering me on my talk page and, if you intend to still waste your time blindly and ignorantly ruining other user's entries then you at least must try to a) educate yourself at least about wikipedia basic policies and guidelines, b) drop your attempts at masquerading yourself as some sort of authority in wikipedia, c) stop with these idiotic passive-aggressive stunts, and d) cut out your whiny victimization act.  You, as any regular wikipedian, should understand that wikipedia is supposed to serve as a communication channel where everyone can and should not only access information but also share it.  It is not, nor should it be used as venue to showcase petty behaviour and make up for whatever frustrations you have with your life.  So stop bothering me and at least try to be a decent wikipedian for a change.  And -- [[User:Mecanismo|Mecanismo]] | [[User talk:Mecanismo|Talk]] 04:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

278864 +++$+++ Noisalt +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278864 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-22 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.248246180E09 +++$+++ I removed the speedy deletion tag you put on [[Blue marble energy]]. The article clearly did not meet that criterion at all. Looking at your talk page you've obviously had a lot of problems with this. Maybe you should refrain from using the CSD templates until you know how to use them correctly. \u2014 +++$+++ I removed the speedy deletion tag you put on [[Blue marble energy]]. The article clearly did not meet that criterion at all. Looking at your talk page you've obviously had a lot of problems with this. Maybe you should refrain from using the CSD templates until you know how to use them correctly. —[[User:Noisalt|Noisalt]] ([[User talk:Noisalt|talk]]) 00:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
278865 +++$+++ Noisalt +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278864 +++$+++ 278864 +++$+++ 2009-07-22 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.248248880E09 +++$+++ The criterion had nothing to do with notability. Read what it said. Speedy deletion is what ruins this site for new users, so I don't have warm feelings for people who misuse it. \u2014 +++$+++ :The criterion had nothing to do with notability. Read what it said. Speedy deletion is what ruins this site for new users, so I don't have warm feelings for people who misuse it. —[[User:Noisalt|Noisalt]] ([[User talk:Noisalt|talk]]) 00:48, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

87401 +++$+++ SEWilco +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-19 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.245408660E09 +++$+++ OK, your NPOV edit gave me a grin today.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Chili_con_carne&diff=296796810&oldid=296775837] --  +++$+++ OK, your NPOV edit gave me a grin today.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chili_con_carne&diff=296796810&oldid=296775837] -- [[User:SEWilco|SEWilco]] ([[User talk:SEWilco|talk]]) 03:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
87402 +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ Qwfp +++$+++ 87401 +++$+++ 87401 +++$+++ 2009-06-19 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.245432000E09 +++$+++ Thanks!   +++$+++ :Thanks!  [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp#top|talk]]) 10:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

16722 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-25 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.267086360E09 +++$+++ I tagged that one wrong. What do I tag article like [[Hundred Years]] and [[WTFRUW]] <font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ I tagged that one wrong. What do I tag article like [[Hundred Years]] and [[WTFRUW]] <font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="#ffff00">J</font><font color="#009900">F</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]] [[User Talk:Ctjf83|GoUSA]]</font> 00:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
16723 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16722 +++$+++ 16722 +++$+++ 2010-02-25 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.267086600E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks. <font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ :Ok, thanks. <font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="#ffff00">J</font><font color="#009900">F</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]] [[User Talk:Ctjf83|GoUSA]]</font> 00:30, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

278868 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278868 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-10 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.249930440E09 +++$+++ Hi. Which foreign language Wikipedia is it from? I can't find it. -- +++$+++ Hi. Which foreign language Wikipedia is it from? I can't find it. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 11:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
278869 +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278868 +++$+++ 278868 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.249930560E09 +++$+++ When I hovered over the original article, I thought it said that it was on the Indian version of WP, though I could be mistaken. -- +++$+++ :When I hovered over the original article, I thought it said that it was on the Indian version of WP, though I could be mistaken. --[[User:Mhking|mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking#top|talk]]) 11:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
278870 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278868 +++$+++ 278869 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.249930680E09 +++$+++ Ah, thanks. I couldn't find a text string match, but that's not definitive. -- +++$+++ ::Ah, thanks. I couldn't find a text string match, but that's not definitive. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 11:58, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

46478 +++$+++ Kung Fu Man +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46478 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-01 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.249181220E09 +++$+++ I went ahead and nominated ''[[Pok\xe9mon Red and Blue]]'' for A-class, it'll probably be a good long while before it gets two editors to give it a once over but it should pass and bump it up a notch on the assessment scale.-- +++$+++ I went ahead and nominated ''[[Pokémon Red and Blue]]'' for A-class, it'll probably be a good long while before it gets two editors to give it a once over but it should pass and bump it up a notch on the assessment scale.--[[User:Kung Fu Man|Kung Fu Man]] ([[User talk:Kung Fu Man|talk]]) 19:47, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
46479 +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46478 +++$+++ 46478 +++$+++ 2009-08-01 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.249182480E09 +++$+++ My reply [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Kung_Fu_Man&diff=305511683&oldid=305153841 here]. ''' +++$+++ :My reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kung_Fu_Man&diff=305511683&oldid=305153841 here]. '''[[User:Artichoker|<span style="color:#064">Artichoker</span>]]'''<sup>['''[[User talk:Artichoker|<span style="color:#000">talk</span>]]''']</sup> 20:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
46480 +++$+++ Kung Fu Man +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46478 +++$+++ 46479 +++$+++ 2009-08-03 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.249331400E09 +++$+++ Delayed reply (been busy as heck x_X), but you might find Google Books to be useful to get an idea what to expect from the book. Its search function is currently a lot more useful than it was, since even for pages it doesn't actively show it will give a chunk of the surrounding paragraph(s) for what you search for in the book. It's damn handy for cultural impact information, that's for sure.-- +++$+++ ::Delayed reply (been busy as heck x_X), but you might find Google Books to be useful to get an idea what to expect from the book. Its search function is currently a lot more useful than it was, since even for pages it doesn't actively show it will give a chunk of the surrounding paragraph(s) for what you search for in the book. It's damn handy for cultural impact information, that's for sure.--[[User:Kung Fu Man|Kung Fu Man]] ([[User talk:Kung Fu Man|talk]]) 13:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

16726 +++$+++ Peteburns123 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16726 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-03 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.267672680E09 +++$+++ Dear Realkyhick, we communicated a few weeks ago about this page that I created. I promised to update it with references to reliable external sources. I have been working on this and have a range of references to news articles and reviews of Prof. Connolly's work in national newspapers in the UK, US and Australia. While sourcing this I also felt it worthwhile just expanding the page with an outline of his career to date and key developments in his work. This has taken a little longer than I thought and hence the delay. I've neatly finished it and am planning to upload it this coming weekend. In the meantime, I've added reference to the fact that he has recently been appointed to the prestigious honourary position of Donald Dewar Visiting Chair in Social Justice and Public Policy at University of Glasgow. I've checked the notability requirements and I feel that this, together with his editorship of a major international journal, should be sufficient. However, I will press ahead and add in the other references I mentioned in the next few days and maybe I can then check back with you if this is sufficient? In the meantime, I would be really grateful if you didn't delete the page until I've had chance to update it this weekend? Thanks again for your help and advice in this, Pete. +++$+++ Dear Realkyhick, we communicated a few weeks ago about this page that I created. I promised to update it with references to reliable external sources. I have been working on this and have a range of references to news articles and reviews of Prof. Connolly's work in national newspapers in the UK, US and Australia. While sourcing this I also felt it worthwhile just expanding the page with an outline of his career to date and key developments in his work. This has taken a little longer than I thought and hence the delay. I've neatly finished it and am planning to upload it this coming weekend. In the meantime, I've added reference to the fact that he has recently been appointed to the prestigious honourary position of Donald Dewar Visiting Chair in Social Justice and Public Policy at University of Glasgow. I've checked the notability requirements and I feel that this, together with his editorship of a major international journal, should be sufficient. However, I will press ahead and add in the other references I mentioned in the next few days and maybe I can then check back with you if this is sufficient? In the meantime, I would be really grateful if you didn't delete the page until I've had chance to update it this weekend? Thanks again for your help and advice in this, Pete.[[User:Peteburns123|Peteburns123]] ([[User talk:Peteburns123|talk]]) 19:18, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
16727 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16726 +++$+++ 16726 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.267962360E09 +++$+++ I strongly advise you to limit your efforts to promote yourself to venues such as your own web site, Facebook or other such places. Unless several [[WP:RS|independent, reliable sources]] write about youi in a way that shows your notability, it is highly unlikely an article about you will be allowed to stand. -  +++$+++ :I strongly advise you to limit your efforts to promote yourself to venues such as your own web site, Facebook or other such places. Unless several [[WP:RS|independent, reliable sources]] write about youi in a way that shows your notability, it is highly unlikely an article about you will be allowed to stand. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 03:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
16728 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16726 +++$+++ 16726 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.267967040E09 +++$+++ As to [[WP:Reference|referencing]], you don't have to cite every sentence. One reference covering the paragraph is often enough. You can also re-use one ref within the text, but first naming it and then using the name tag: for example<br\/> <nowiki>Water is wet<ref name=bla>[bla.com Properties of water] by John Carpenter, November 26, 2009<\/ref>, but some respectable folks don't think so.<ref name=bla\/><\/nowiki>  +++$+++ *As to [[WP:Reference|referencing]], you don't have to cite every sentence. One reference covering the paragraph is often enough. You can also re-use one ref within the text, but first naming it and then using the name tag: for example<br/> <nowiki>Water is wet<ref name=bla>[bla.com Properties of water] by John Carpenter, November 26, 2009</ref>, but some respectable folks don't think so.<ref name=bla/></nowiki> [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 05:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

90169 +++$+++  +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-11 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.247316360E09 +++$+++ I have removed the {{tl|prod}} tag from [[Icon (airline)]], which you proposed for deletion.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{tl|prod}} template back to the article.  Instead, feel free to list it at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]].  Thanks! <!-- [[Template:Deprod]] --> ''I'll actually be listing it at AfD, silly template!''  +++$+++ I have removed the {{tl|prod}} tag from [[Icon (airline)]], which you proposed for deletion.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{tl|prod}} template back to the article.  Instead, feel free to list it at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]].  Thanks! <!-- [[Template:Deprod]] --> ''I'll actually be listing it at AfD, silly template!'' [[User:GrooveDog|GrooveDog]] <small>([[User talk:GrooveDog|talk]]) ([[Wikipedia:Editor review/GrooveDog|Review]])</small> 05:46, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
90170 +++$+++  +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90169 +++$+++ 90169 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.247316540E09 +++$+++ And listed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Icon (airline)|here]] for AfD.  +++$+++ :And listed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icon (airline)|here]] for AfD. [[User:GrooveDog|GrooveDog]] <small>([[User talk:GrooveDog|talk]]) ([[Wikipedia:Editor review/GrooveDog|Review]])</small> 05:49, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

278873 +++$+++ Pnelnik +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-19 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.250699640E09 +++$+++ Thanks  +++$+++ Thanks [[User:Pnelnik|Pnelnik]] ([[User talk:Pnelnik|talk]]) 09:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
278874 +++$+++ Pnelnik +++$+++ Mhking +++$+++ 278873 +++$+++ 278873 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.250703300E09 +++$+++ Thanks  +++$+++ :Thanks [[User:Pnelnik|Pnelnik]] ([[User talk:Pnelnik|talk]]) 10:35, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

16731 +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16731 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-07 07:17:00 +++$+++ 1.267975020E09 +++$+++ Would you like to explain to me why you removed my response at ANI? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=348282440&oldid=348282308]  +++$+++ Would you like to explain to me why you removed my response at ANI? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=348282440&oldid=348282308] [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 07:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
16732 +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16731 +++$+++ 16731 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.267975260E09 +++$+++ Accidents happen. I was trying to figure out what my response in that thread had to do with Anti_IP bias. :)  +++$+++ *Accidents happen. I was trying to figure out what my response in that thread had to do with Anti_IP bias. :) [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 07:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
16733 +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16731 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.267975980E09 +++$+++ You're probably on the right track anyway. A new editor that jumps onto nearly 200 edits in 2 days, issuing warnings etc..... he ain't a new user.  +++$+++ ::*You're probably on the right track anyway. A new editor that jumps onto nearly 200 edits in 2 days, issuing warnings etc..... he ain't a new user. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 07:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
16734 +++$+++ Niteshift36 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16731 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 07:41:00 +++$+++ 1.267976460E09 +++$+++ I'm a firm believer in calling a [[WP:DUCK|duck a duck]]. AGF isn't a suicide pact.  +++$+++ :::*I'm a firm believer in calling a [[WP:DUCK|duck a duck]]. AGF isn't a suicide pact. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 07:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

278877 +++$+++ Basawala +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278877 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-30 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.151729880E09 +++$+++ Please see the Urdu talk page before making changes or biased claims on the Urdu article.  Thank you.  +++$+++ Please see the Urdu talk page before making changes or biased claims on the Urdu article.  Thank you. [[User:Basawala|Basawala]] 21:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
278878 +++$+++ Basawala +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278877 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.151734140E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but that just doesn't fit in the Urdu page.  In the Hindi page, Urdu is named as a variant of Hindi because of its relevancy to the Hindi page, and there are no ''direct'' references to sociolinguists at all.  Also, Sanskrit borrowings do not play a major role in Urdu.  I will not revert the Urdu page, but I will do so in time being, in hope of any Urdu expert who may help us on the issue.  Thanks.   +++$+++ ::Sorry, but that just doesn't fit in the Urdu page.  In the Hindi page, Urdu is named as a variant of Hindi because of its relevancy to the Hindi page, and there are no ''direct'' references to sociolinguists at all.  Also, Sanskrit borrowings do not play a major role in Urdu.  I will not revert the Urdu page, but I will do so in time being, in hope of any Urdu expert who may help us on the issue.  Thanks.  [[User:Basawala|Basawala]] 23:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
278879 +++$+++ Jdas07 +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278877 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-01 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.151760120E09 +++$+++ [[User:Basawala|Basawala]], thanks for your concern on this issue. I just placed what I found and researched to be correct on the [[Urdu]] article. I have two sources for Urdu being a variant of [[Hindi]]: (1) [[http:\/\/www.ethnologue.org\/14\/show_language.asp?code=HND Ethnologue: Comments]] (2) [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hindi#Sociolinguistics_of_Hindi Sociolinguistics of Hindi]]. For the second issue regarding [[Sanskrit]] loanwords in Urdu I, as native speaker of Urdu and Hindi, found there to be a significant amount of Sanskrit borrowings in the Urdu language, such as dant (tooth),  dhuan (smoke), nakhun (fingernail), aag (fire), etc. Also, since 60% of Urdu uses vocabulary from Hindi, which is based on Sanskrit (as all Indo-Aryan\/Indian origin languages are), one could deduce that Urdu would also have some Sansktrit borrowings. The same is true of [[Persian]] words in Urdu. Urdu is also based on Persian, which has a singificant amount of loanwords from Arabic. Hence, we can say that Urdu (which has a large number of borrowings from Persian) also has a significant amount of loanwords from Arabic. A source that I found hepls support this argument: [[http:\/\/www.geocities.com\/sikmirza\/arabic\/hindustani.html Hindi-Urdu FAQ: What are the origins of Hindi and Urdu?]]. Thanks for not reverting the Urdu page. I also hope there will be another expert to help us. Thank you again for all your understanding in this matter. -- +++$+++ :::[[User:Basawala|Basawala]], thanks for your concern on this issue. I just placed what I found and researched to be correct on the [[Urdu]] article. I have two sources for Urdu being a variant of [[Hindi]]: (1) [[http://www.ethnologue.org/14/show_language.asp?code=HND Ethnologue: Comments]] (2) [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindi#Sociolinguistics_of_Hindi Sociolinguistics of Hindi]]. For the second issue regarding [[Sanskrit]] loanwords in Urdu I, as native speaker of Urdu and Hindi, found there to be a significant amount of Sanskrit borrowings in the Urdu language, such as dant (tooth),  dhuan (smoke), nakhun (fingernail), aag (fire), etc. Also, since 60% of Urdu uses vocabulary from Hindi, which is based on Sanskrit (as all Indo-Aryan/Indian origin languages are), one could deduce that Urdu would also have some Sansktrit borrowings. The same is true of [[Persian]] words in Urdu. Urdu is also based on Persian, which has a singificant amount of loanwords from Arabic. Hence, we can say that Urdu (which has a large number of borrowings from Persian) also has a significant amount of loanwords from Arabic. A source that I found hepls support this argument: [[http://www.geocities.com/sikmirza/arabic/hindustani.html Hindi-Urdu FAQ: What are the origins of Hindi and Urdu?]]. Thanks for not reverting the Urdu page. I also hope there will be another expert to help us. Thank you again for all your understanding in this matter. --[[User:Jdas07|Jdas07]] 06:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

541022 +++$+++ Dabbler +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-11 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.213235340E09 +++$+++ You just deleted William Hewer which I found as a very bad stub just this morning, as I said in my initial edit summary, I was planning to fix and expand it once I got my sources in order. I agree that it was only a single sentence or so and I will be recreating it again, so please don't just jump in and delete it again when there is an indication that a stub will be actively worked on.  +++$+++ You just deleted William Hewer which I found as a very bad stub just this morning, as I said in my initial edit summary, I was planning to fix and expand it once I got my sources in order. I agree that it was only a single sentence or so and I will be recreating it again, so please don't just jump in and delete it again when there is an indication that a stub will be actively worked on. [[User:Dabbler|Dabbler]] ([[User talk:Dabbler|talk]]) 18:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
541023 +++$+++ Dabbler +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541022 +++$+++ 541022 +++$+++ 2008-06-11 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.213235820E09 +++$+++ If you looked at the edit history you will see that it had been edited by me just this morning before I had to go to work except the edit summary. I didn't put any tag on it then partly because I was in a rush but also as it had been sitting for over a week as a very bad stub, but Hewer is notable as a significant person in Samuel pepys life and diary.  +++$+++ :If you looked at the edit history you will see that it had been edited by me just this morning before I had to go to work except the edit summary. I didn't put any tag on it then partly because I was in a rush but also as it had been sitting for over a week as a very bad stub, but Hewer is notable as a significant person in Samuel pepys life and diary. [[User:Dabbler|Dabbler]] ([[User talk:Dabbler|talk]]) 18:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

16735 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-07 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.267976700E09 +++$+++ Please don't edit other users' comments, as you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:SABRMnLgs&diff=next&oldid=348259276 here]. You may post whatever you want below them, but striking another editor's comment is generally frowned upon, regardless of what you believe about that editor. <b class=\"IPA\"> +++$+++ Please don't edit other users' comments, as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SABRMnLgs&diff=next&oldid=348259276 here]. You may post whatever you want below them, but striking another editor's comment is generally frowned upon, regardless of what you believe about that editor. <b class="IPA">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 07:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
16736 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16735 +++$+++ 16735 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.267977120E09 +++$+++ In the future, it will be sufficient just to tell the person that they don't need to worry about those warnings; again, per [[WP:TPOC]], you shouldn't edit others' comments. <b class=\"IPA\"> +++$+++ :In the future, it will be sufficient just to tell the person that they don't need to worry about those warnings; again, per [[WP:TPOC]], you shouldn't edit others' comments. <b class="IPA">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 07:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

278880 +++$+++ Basawala +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278880 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-30 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.151734260E09 +++$+++ Your Urdu name does not really match you Hindi name, because they would be pronounced differently due to the second \"a\" in your middle name, or I could be wrong.   +++$+++ Your Urdu name does not really match you Hindi name, because they would be pronounced differently due to the second "a" in your middle name, or I could be wrong.  [[User:Basawala|Basawala]] 23:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
278881 +++$+++ Basawala +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278880 +++$+++ 278880 +++$+++ 2006-07-02 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.151826720E09 +++$+++ I would like to point out, it seems that you use alif madd \u0622, for the initial Hindi \u0905 (a), instead of just an alif. This is from the Urdu that was added on the [[Ayodhya]] page.  The correct way is just an alif \u0627 , with the optional vowel mark (sorry for the lack of a better term).  This would apply for initial i and initial u, too (with different vowel marks).  Your Hindi name would be in Urdu \u0627\u0646\u067e\u0645 for practical purposes (w\/o vowel marks) and \u0623\u0646\u064f\u062b\u064e\u0645 for it to be pronounce correctly.  I used the hamzah on top of alif for the short \"a\" sound (a rule carried to urdu from arabic i think), but just the vowel mark could be used as well, i dont know about the rule on this.  I would write the alif with no mark at all, and with the short vowel markings on the other letters.  Sorry for the delay, my Urdu keyboard cannot write vowel marks and my Farsi keyboard is really different from the Urdu, so it took me a while to figure it out.  Do you know how you can get vowel marks for the Urdu keyboard?  <br> Hope this is of any help to you!  Thanks!  +++$+++ :I would like to point out, it seems that you use alif madd آ, for the initial Hindi अ (a), instead of just an alif. This is from the Urdu that was added on the [[Ayodhya]] page.  The correct way is just an alif ا , with the optional vowel mark (sorry for the lack of a better term).  This would apply for initial i and initial u, too (with different vowel marks).  Your Hindi name would be in Urdu انپم for practical purposes (w/o vowel marks) and أنُثَم for it to be pronounce correctly.  I used the hamzah on top of alif for the short "a" sound (a rule carried to urdu from arabic i think), but just the vowel mark could be used as well, i dont know about the rule on this.  I would write the alif with no mark at all, and with the short vowel markings on the other letters.  Sorry for the delay, my Urdu keyboard cannot write vowel marks and my Farsi keyboard is really different from the Urdu, so it took me a while to figure it out.  Do you know how you can get vowel marks for the Urdu keyboard?  <br> Hope this is of any help to you!  Thanks! [[User:Basawala|Basawala]] 00:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
278882 +++$+++ Basawala +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278880 +++$+++ 278881 +++$+++ 2006-07-02 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.151828220E09 +++$+++ Oh, and I also think that John in Urdu is  \u062c\u0627\u0646, although I have only seen this once.  The way it is on your userpage, it could be read as \"June, but then without the vowel markers, Urdu is like that.  Jaan itself may create problems (like \"Jaan jaan pakistan or Jaanu meri jaan), but I'm pretty sure that's the correct way to write John in Urdu.  I hope you find this useful, too! Thanks  +++$+++ ::Oh, and I also think that John in Urdu is  جان, although I have only seen this once.  The way it is on your userpage, it could be read as "June, but then without the vowel markers, Urdu is like that.  Jaan itself may create problems (like "Jaan jaan pakistan or Jaanu meri jaan), but I'm pretty sure that's the correct way to write John in Urdu.  I hope you find this useful, too! Thanks [[User:Basawala|Basawala]] 01:17, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
278883 +++$+++ Basawala +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278880 +++$+++ 278882 +++$+++ 2006-07-03 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.151988120E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome!  I love the Urdu language and script, and I love helping people with it.  I have learned quite a lot of scripts, and Urdu's script is one of the hardest to read and write correctly, but it is really worth learning it, especially for reading the vast amount of literature in Urdu.  Thanks for appreciating Urdu, thanks also and taking the time to edit Urdu and Urdu-related articles on Wikipedia! --  +++$+++ :::You're very welcome!  I love the Urdu language and script, and I love helping people with it.  I have learned quite a lot of scripts, and Urdu's script is one of the hardest to read and write correctly, but it is really worth learning it, especially for reading the vast amount of literature in Urdu.  Thanks for appreciating Urdu, thanks also and taking the time to edit Urdu and Urdu-related articles on Wikipedia! -- [[User:Basawala|Basawala]] 21:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

278886 +++$+++ Jpgordon +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278886 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-13 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.152853740E09 +++$+++ Could you please point me to where in [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)]] is the language overriding [[WP:MOSBIO]], which states ''Academic and professional titles (such as \"Doctor\" or \"Professor\") should not be used before the name in the initial sentence or in subsequent uses of the person's name''? Neither of those deal with the honorific \"Rev.\" either, but that's a professional title as well, I'd think. -- +++$+++ Could you please point me to where in [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)]] is the language overriding [[WP:MOSBIO]], which states ''Academic and professional titles (such as "Doctor" or "Professor") should not be used before the name in the initial sentence or in subsequent uses of the person's name''? Neither of those deal with the honorific "Rev." either, but that's a professional title as well, I'd think. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710;]]</small></sup> 22:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
278887 +++$+++ Jdas07 +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278886 +++$+++ 278886 +++$+++ 2006-07-13 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.152857460E09 +++$+++ Hello! Under [[WP:MOSBIO#Honorific_prefixes]], it says \"In cases where the person is widely known by a pseudonym or stage name containing such a title (whether earned or not), it may be included as described above.\" From my understanding, most individuals know him with the honorific. The Wikipedia [[Naming_conventions_%28names_and_titles%29#Clerical_names|Naming conventions (names and titles)]] for Clerical names doesn not specify the use of \"Reverend\" or \"Father\". I guess it is up to the people who mantain an article to use whatever convention with \"Reverend\" and \"Doctor\". However, there have been many articles I have run across which include this honorific such as [[William S. Bowdern]], [[Gong Shengliang]], [[Samuel Seabury]], [[John Hagee]], [[Jack W. Hayford]], [[Estus Pirkle]], [[Frank K. Allan]], and [[Larry Davis]]. Then again, there are articles that do not. Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., in particular, was known as the leader of the [[Southern Christian Leadership Conference]]. He also graduated with theology degrees and was a minister. Hence, becuase of his role as a clergyman, his education, and the common convention for his name, I believe that \"Reverend\" and \"Dr.\" are appropriate honorifics for this page. I hope this helps! Have a good day.  +++$+++ :Hello! Under [[WP:MOSBIO#Honorific_prefixes]], it says "In cases where the person is widely known by a pseudonym or stage name containing such a title (whether earned or not), it may be included as described above." From my understanding, most individuals know him with the honorific. The Wikipedia [[Naming_conventions_%28names_and_titles%29#Clerical_names|Naming conventions (names and titles)]] for Clerical names doesn not specify the use of "Reverend" or "Father". I guess it is up to the people who mantain an article to use whatever convention with "Reverend" and "Doctor". However, there have been many articles I have run across which include this honorific such as [[William S. Bowdern]], [[Gong Shengliang]], [[Samuel Seabury]], [[John Hagee]], [[Jack W. Hayford]], [[Estus Pirkle]], [[Frank K. Allan]], and [[Larry Davis]]. Then again, there are articles that do not. Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., in particular, was known as the leader of the [[Southern Christian Leadership Conference]]. He also graduated with theology degrees and was a minister. Hence, becuase of his role as a clergyman, his education, and the common convention for his name, I believe that "Reverend" and "Dr." are appropriate honorifics for this page. I hope this helps! Have a good day. [[User:Jdas07|Jdas07]] 23:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
278888 +++$+++ Jpgordon +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278886 +++$+++ 278887 +++$+++ 2006-07-13 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.152857820E09 +++$+++ Well, your first citation is irrelevant, since MLKJr was ''not'' widely known by a pseudonym or stage name. That those articles include the honorific simply means those articles aren't consistant with our manual of style. -- +++$+++ ::Well, your first citation is irrelevant, since MLKJr was ''not'' widely known by a pseudonym or stage name. That those articles include the honorific simply means those articles aren't consistant with our manual of style. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710;]]</small></sup> 23:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
278889 +++$+++ Jdas07 +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278886 +++$+++ 278888 +++$+++ 2006-07-13 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.152858180E09 +++$+++ Maybe he was not known with the honorific in the past. However, from my understanding, most individuals know him with the honorific today, as textbooks in the American education system include the honorific. I hope this helps! Thanks!  +++$+++ :::Maybe he was not known with the honorific in the past. However, from my understanding, most individuals know him with the honorific today, as textbooks in the American education system include the honorific. I hope this helps! Thanks! [[User:Jdas07|Jdas07]] 23:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
278890 +++$+++ Jpgordon +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278886 +++$+++ 278889 +++$+++ 2006-07-13 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.152858480E09 +++$+++ You're missing the point. Read the sentence you're citing: ''In cases where the person is widely known by a '''pseudonym''' or '''stage name''' containing such a title...'' The point of that rule is to deal with people like [[Dr. John]] or [[Dr. Dre]]. Otherwise, [[WP:MOSBIO]] applies. -- +++$+++ ::::You're missing the point. Read the sentence you're citing: ''In cases where the person is widely known by a '''pseudonym''' or '''stage name''' containing such a title...'' The point of that rule is to deal with people like [[Dr. John]] or [[Dr. Dre]]. Otherwise, [[WP:MOSBIO]] applies. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710;]]</small></sup> 23:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
278891 +++$+++ Jdas07 +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278886 +++$+++ 278890 +++$+++ 2006-07-13 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.152858840E09 +++$+++ Hello again! Thanks for filling me in on that and I apologize for my misunderstanding. You can remove the honorific \"Dr.\" if you would like. However, since their is no naming convention for \"Reverend\", I would prefer to keep it for the reasons I listed in my first response. Thanks for all your help and concern!  +++$+++ :::::Hello again! Thanks for filling me in on that and I apologize for my misunderstanding. You can remove the honorific "Dr." if you would like. However, since their is no naming convention for "Reverend", I would prefer to keep it for the reasons I listed in my first response. Thanks for all your help and concern! [[User:Jdas07|Jdas07]] 23:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

46481 +++$+++ Kung Fu Man +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46481 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-13 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.250148840E09 +++$+++ It's honestly worth a shot, FAC's still part crapshoot but the article looks pretty damn good all around and the sources stick. I'd say give it a go, couldn't hurt to try it.-- +++$+++ It's honestly worth a shot, FAC's still part crapshoot but the article looks pretty damn good all around and the sources stick. I'd say give it a go, couldn't hurt to try it.--[[User:Kung Fu Man|Kung Fu Man]] ([[User talk:Kung Fu Man|talk]]) 00:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
46482 +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46481 +++$+++ 46481 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.250150220E09 +++$+++ My reply [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Kung_Fu_Man&diff=307662472&oldid=307657903 here]. ''' +++$+++ :My reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kung_Fu_Man&diff=307662472&oldid=307657903 here]. '''[[User:Artichoker|<span style="color:#064">Artichoker</span>]]'''<sup>['''[[User talk:Artichoker|<span style="color:#000">talk</span>]]''']</sup> 00:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

16746 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-16 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.268736360E09 +++$+++ I deleted your dated prod notice.  The article is a stub now but it will grow.  Scafetta is rare among academics in that his research affects so many disciplines.  I suggest you wait 90 days to see the article develop before attempting to delete it again.  By that time, you may see the article's worth. What's the hurry?  +++$+++ I deleted your dated prod notice.  The article is a stub now but it will grow.  Scafetta is rare among academics in that his research affects so many disciplines.  I suggest you wait 90 days to see the article develop before attempting to delete it again.  By that time, you may see the article's worth. What's the hurry? [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram|talk]]) 03:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
16747 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16746 +++$+++ 16746 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.268740920E09 +++$+++ Five days?  It takes me that long to write a paragraph!  You never did explain what the hurry was all about.  Why would you want to delete an article about someone being praised as a future Nobel Prize winner?  +++$+++ :Five days?  It takes me that long to write a paragraph!  You never did explain what the hurry was all about.  Why would you want to delete an article about someone being praised as a future Nobel Prize winner? [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram|talk]]) 05:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
16748 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16746 +++$+++ 16747 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.268744160E09 +++$+++ I'm still adding to the article.  Go read it. If you don't read Italian, use babelfish.  You will see the article saying he may be a future Nobel winner.  You say you are suspicious of me, which is against policy.  You are supposed to assume good faith.  Neither Scafetta nor I am trying to profit by selling any product.  I don't know the man.  I work in healthcare in California.  He is at Duke.  He has done some research in gait analysis which crosses into my field, but there is no connection between us.  I am a global warming skeptic and came to the same conclusions he did about future global temps a few years back.  Of course, my calculations were more back of the envelope stuff while he has proposed a serious theory. But since he agrees with me, I happen to view him as pretty intelligent.  I have been hearing his name for a few years now, but did not know anything about him. I went to Wikipedia to learn about him and saw that he needed an article. Scafetta is young, only 39.  The normal standards for whether an academic is notable favors the older profs and researchers.  Being young should not keep him out of Wikipedia.  Einstein was young when he wrote his theory of special relativity.  Do you know why Einstein was such a big deal?  Because his theories were later confirmed by observation.  Scafetta has the chance to pull off the same kind of feat.  BTW, you still haven't explained what the hurry is. If you are afraid I'm using some tactic, put a tickler in your Outlook Calendar for June 15 to remind yourself to check the Scafetta article.  It's not hard.  +++$+++ ::I'm still adding to the article.  Go read it. If you don't read Italian, use babelfish.  You will see the article saying he may be a future Nobel winner.  You say you are suspicious of me, which is against policy.  You are supposed to assume good faith.  Neither Scafetta nor I am trying to profit by selling any product.  I don't know the man.  I work in healthcare in California.  He is at Duke.  He has done some research in gait analysis which crosses into my field, but there is no connection between us.  I am a global warming skeptic and came to the same conclusions he did about future global temps a few years back.  Of course, my calculations were more back of the envelope stuff while he has proposed a serious theory. But since he agrees with me, I happen to view him as pretty intelligent.  I have been hearing his name for a few years now, but did not know anything about him. I went to Wikipedia to learn about him and saw that he needed an article. Scafetta is young, only 39.  The normal standards for whether an academic is notable favors the older profs and researchers.  Being young should not keep him out of Wikipedia.  Einstein was young when he wrote his theory of special relativity.  Do you know why Einstein was such a big deal?  Because his theories were later confirmed by observation.  Scafetta has the chance to pull off the same kind of feat.  BTW, you still haven't explained what the hurry is. If you are afraid I'm using some tactic, put a tickler in your Outlook Calendar for June 15 to remind yourself to check the Scafetta article.  It's not hard. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram|talk]]) 05:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
16749 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16746 +++$+++ 16748 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.268773260E09 +++$+++ I do not believe you ever assumed good faith.  You attempted to delete a new article before giving it a chance to develop.  You must think of yourself as some kind of Wikipedia janitor.  Far better for you to spend your time trying to make the article better.  And if you don't like Outlook, get some other Calendar program.  There are tons of them out there and some available on freeware.  You don't even have to spend any money.  +++$+++ :::I do not believe you ever assumed good faith.  You attempted to delete a new article before giving it a chance to develop.  You must think of yourself as some kind of Wikipedia janitor.  Far better for you to spend your time trying to make the article better.  And if you don't like Outlook, get some other Calendar program.  There are tons of them out there and some available on freeware.  You don't even have to spend any money. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram|talk]]) 14:01, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
16750 +++$+++ RonCram +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16746 +++$+++ 16749 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.268774520E09 +++$+++ I know all about NPP and I have had pages I have written highlighted in the \"Did you know?\" section on the front page.  The link you provided has this bit of advice - \"Tagging anything other than attack pages or complete nonsense a minute after creation is not constructive and only serves to annoy the page author.\" You should know I am annoyed by both the speed at which you tagged the page and the attitude you have had.  Your behavior in this instance is not helping you build your reputation in the community.  +++$+++ ::::I know all about NPP and I have had pages I have written highlighted in the "Did you know?" section on the front page.  The link you provided has this bit of advice - "Tagging anything other than attack pages or complete nonsense a minute after creation is not constructive and only serves to annoy the page author." You should know I am annoyed by both the speed at which you tagged the page and the attitude you have had.  Your behavior in this instance is not helping you build your reputation in the community. [[User:RonCram|RonCram]] ([[User talk:RonCram|talk]]) 14:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

541036 +++$+++ Mauler90 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541036 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-03 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.215140820E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}<\/code> to '''the top of [[:Tanahat|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or \"db\" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:Tanahat|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontext-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom -->  +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Tanahat|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:Tanahat|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontext-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Mauler90|mauler90]] ([[User talk:Mauler90|talk]]) 20:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
541037 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541036 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.215141120E09 +++$+++ Speedy declined. A town with coordinates and a map and a reference is not a criteria for speedy deletion. It just needs expansion, +++$+++ ::Speedy declined. A town with coordinates and a map and a reference is not a criteria for speedy deletion. It just needs expansion,[[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">'''$1,000,000?'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 20:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

278893 +++$+++ Magicalsaumy +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-26 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.153956180E09 +++$+++ Hindustani grammar is an entire copy of [[Hindi grammar]], a page entirely authored by me. By the way I am going to make well referenced and organized, but major changes in Hindi grammar page. And the info on Urdu page is acceptable.  +++$+++ Hindustani grammar is an entire copy of [[Hindi grammar]], a page entirely authored by me. By the way I am going to make well referenced and organized, but major changes in Hindi grammar page. And the info on Urdu page is acceptable. [[User:Magicalsaumy|Cygnus_hansa]] 16:23, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
278894 +++$+++ Magicalsaumy +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278893 +++$+++ 278893 +++$+++ 2006-07-26 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.153961820E09 +++$+++ Oh no, no problem about the Hindustani grammar page. But where do you live in the US? I am also coming there soon, to University of Illinois. +++$+++ :Oh no, no problem about the Hindustani grammar page. But where do you live in the US? I am also coming there soon, to University of Illinois.[[User:Magicalsaumy|Cygnus_hansa]] 17:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
278895 +++$+++ Magicalsaumy +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278893 +++$+++ 278894 +++$+++ 2006-07-26 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.153962900E09 +++$+++ Yes, I'll be attending University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign. +++$+++ ::Yes, I'll be attending University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.[[User:Magicalsaumy|Cygnus_hansa]] 18:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

541038 +++$+++ Otolemur crassicaudatus +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-04 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.215171300E09 +++$+++ When you are adding project banner in talk pages, then why don't you add the talkheader at the top? It is not must, but it is generally a good practice to add the talkheader. Thanks. ''' +++$+++ When you are adding project banner in talk pages, then why don't you add the talkheader at the top? It is not must, but it is generally a good practice to add the talkheader. Thanks. '''[[User:Otolemur crassicaudatus|<font color="002bb8">Otolemur crassicaudatus</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Otolemur crassicaudatus|talk]]) 04:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
541039 +++$+++ Otolemur crassicaudatus +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541038 +++$+++ 541038 +++$+++ 2008-07-04 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.215171840E09 +++$+++ You should place the talkheader at the top of the page and the project banner below. Cheers. ''' +++$+++ :You should place the talkheader at the top of the page and the project banner below. Cheers. '''[[User:Otolemur crassicaudatus|<font color="002bb8">Otolemur crassicaudatus</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Otolemur crassicaudatus|talk]]) 04:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
541040 +++$+++ Korg +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541038 +++$+++ 541039 +++$+++ 2008-07-04 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.215214440E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Template:Talkheader#Usage]]. In most circumstances it is unnecessary if the talk page is empty. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Please see [[Template:Talkheader#Usage]]. In most circumstances it is unnecessary if the talk page is empty. Regards, [[User:Korg|Korg]] ([[User talk:Korg|talk]]) 16:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

483389 +++$+++ Mrs.EasterBunny +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-26 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.190865420E09 +++$+++ Please note that I don't have a dispute or grudge against you.  I am merely puzzled to why a non-notable terrorist has an article instead of referring to the event.  Ringleader Atta fits the criteria for an article but not Marwan, in my opinion.  Any advice or rationale??  +++$+++ Please note that I don't have a dispute or grudge against you.  I am merely puzzled to why a non-notable terrorist has an article instead of referring to the event.  Ringleader Atta fits the criteria for an article but not Marwan, in my opinion.  Any advice or rationale?? [[User:Mrs.EasterBunny|Mrs.EasterBunny]] 20:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
483390 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483389 +++$+++ 483389 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.190867160E09 +++$+++ Archiving was because the page was enormous, not because of you.  And I don't feel you have a dispute or grudge with me, don't worry.  The consensus on that AFD was clearly to keep it and, as an impartial closing admin, it was my task to make that call.  That's the limit of my involvement with that article.  My comment in closing was in reference to very little policy being mentioned in the nomination or the dissenting opinions.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Archiving was because the page was enormous, not because of you.  And I don't feel you have a dispute or grudge with me, don't worry.  The consensus on that AFD was clearly to keep it and, as an impartial closing admin, it was my task to make that call.  That's the limit of my involvement with that article.  My comment in closing was in reference to very little policy being mentioned in the nomination or the dissenting opinions.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 21:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
483391 +++$+++ Random832 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483389 +++$+++ 483390 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.190940360E09 +++$+++ She's complained on ANI now - it looks like she doesn't really care that it was deleted, but she finds the \"Groundless AFD\" descriptor incivil - While it's not, really, I also don't see any compelling reason it should be retained (it doesn't eludicate on any policy interpretation, etc, saying _why_, it just states your opinion) so would you mind editing your closure note on the AFD? \u2014 +++$+++ ::She's complained on ANI now - it looks like she doesn't really care that it was deleted, but she finds the "Groundless AFD" descriptor incivil - While it's not, really, I also don't see any compelling reason it should be retained (it doesn't eludicate on any policy interpretation, etc, saying _why_, it just states your opinion) so would you mind editing your closure note on the AFD? —[[User talk:Random832|Random832]] 17:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
483392 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483389 +++$+++ 483391 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.190942220E09 +++$+++ Thank you for letting me know about the [[WP:AN]].  And no, I would prefer not to edit my closure note on the AFD.  That sets a bad precedent for people who are being offended too easily.  Folks at [[WP:AN]] (you included) have informed her that she need not take it so seriously and I think that's sufficient.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::Thank you for letting me know about the [[WP:AN]].  And no, I would prefer not to edit my closure note on the AFD.  That sets a bad precedent for people who are being offended too easily.  Folks at [[WP:AN]] (you included) have informed her that she need not take it so seriously and I think that's sufficient.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 18:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

527080 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527080 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-27 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.219889700E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:071204 runningsuit 800.JPG]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:Image:runningsuit 800.JPG]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[Image:runningsuit 800.JPG]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:Image:071204 runningsuit 800.JPG]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:Image:runningsuit 800.JPG]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[Image:runningsuit 800.JPG]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 19:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
527081 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527080 +++$+++ 527080 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.220644980E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:PresidentsOwnheader 14.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:Image:PresidentsOwnheader.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:Image:PresidentsOwnheader 14.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:Image:PresidentsOwnheader.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 13:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
527082 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527080 +++$+++ 527080 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.221361920E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:CMC POC 13Nov2006.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:Image:2006 USMC CMC Passage of Command.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:Image:CMC POC 13Nov2006.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:Image:2006 USMC CMC Passage of Command.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 20:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

16754 +++$+++ Nick carson +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-18 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.268935260E09 +++$+++ Why does this keep happening? Articles are slapped with deletion tags far too quickly and if you don't respond or can't get onto the internet in a few days to add a hang on tag, they're gone! It's just insane, a waste of everyone's time. The article will be re-created and given enough time, properly established and hopefully survive the highly inadequatev speedy deletion process.  +++$+++ Why does this keep happening? Articles are slapped with deletion tags far too quickly and if you don't respond or can't get onto the internet in a few days to add a hang on tag, they're gone! It's just insane, a waste of everyone's time. The article will be re-created and given enough time, properly established and hopefully survive the highly inadequatev speedy deletion process. [[User:Nick carson|Nick carson]] ([[User talk:Nick carson|talk]]) 11:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
16755 +++$+++ Nick carson +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16754 +++$+++ 16754 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.269168360E09 +++$+++ There is no point in deleting fledgling articles so quickly. It's obvious if an article has just been created that it is under construction, this is information that admins and deletionists have available to them and should utilise to avoid unnecessary deletion. Those creating articles (actively contributing to wikipedia) should not have to justify their WP policy conforming contributions to speedy deletionists. Their time should be better spent expanding stubs and actually helping others contribute to WP. Further speedy deletion of articles shall only act as a very annoying and unnecessary appendix to WP.  +++$+++ :There is no point in deleting fledgling articles so quickly. It's obvious if an article has just been created that it is under construction, this is information that admins and deletionists have available to them and should utilise to avoid unnecessary deletion. Those creating articles (actively contributing to wikipedia) should not have to justify their WP policy conforming contributions to speedy deletionists. Their time should be better spent expanding stubs and actually helping others contribute to WP. Further speedy deletion of articles shall only act as a very annoying and unnecessary appendix to WP. [[User:Nick carson|Nick carson]] ([[User talk:Nick carson|talk]]) 03:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
16756 +++$+++ Nick carson +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16754 +++$+++ 16755 +++$+++ 2010-03-21 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.269178860E09 +++$+++ These discussions go to the core of WP policy and the shape of WP policy and what in included and excluded from an open and free encyclopedia such as WP will change, but in the short term, it would be wiser for all concerned if such fledgling articles were given at least an adequate grace period before being deleted, the current period before deletion is far too quick and the editor's time better utlised contributing to the improvement of articles in preference to their deletion.  +++$+++ ::These discussions go to the core of WP policy and the shape of WP policy and what in included and excluded from an open and free encyclopedia such as WP will change, but in the short term, it would be wiser for all concerned if such fledgling articles were given at least an adequate grace period before being deleted, the current period before deletion is far too quick and the editor's time better utlised contributing to the improvement of articles in preference to their deletion. [[User:Nick carson|Nick carson]] ([[User talk:Nick carson|talk]]) 06:41, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
16757 +++$+++ Nick carson +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16754 +++$+++ 16756 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.269540720E09 +++$+++ I understand the problems faced, but surely one could give benefit of the doubt and if no references or work has been done after say 1 or 2 or 3 weeks for example, the AfD process begins? I am just amazed at the haste and the complete disregard for those attempting to create articles legitimately.  +++$+++ :::I understand the problems faced, but surely one could give benefit of the doubt and if no references or work has been done after say 1 or 2 or 3 weeks for example, the AfD process begins? I am just amazed at the haste and the complete disregard for those attempting to create articles legitimately. [[User:Nick carson|Nick carson]] ([[User talk:Nick carson|talk]]) 11:12, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

541046 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-10 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.215752100E09 +++$+++ Was it really necessary to file AfDs on a dozen medical journal stubs?  Better would have been to just place {{tl|prod}} tags on each article, or to file one multi-article AfD.  Even so, most of these journals are clearly notable, being listed in the [[PubMed]] database.  It's disappointing that we now have to go through separate discussions on every single one of them. -- +++$+++ Was it really necessary to file AfDs on a dozen medical journal stubs?  Better would have been to just place {{tl|prod}} tags on each article, or to file one multi-article AfD.  Even so, most of these journals are clearly notable, being listed in the [[PubMed]] database.  It's disappointing that we now have to go through separate discussions on every single one of them. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 21:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
541047 +++$+++ DigitalC +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541046 +++$+++ 541046 +++$+++ 2008-07-10 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.215759480E09 +++$+++ Indeed, it seems like disruption of WP to make a [[WP:POINT|point]]. It would have made more sense to file a test case or two to see what the result is, before filing so many AfDs.  +++$+++ :Indeed, it seems like disruption of WP to make a [[WP:POINT|point]]. It would have made more sense to file a test case or two to see what the result is, before filing so many AfDs. [[User:DigitalC|DigitalC]] ([[User talk:DigitalC|talk]]) 23:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
541048 +++$+++ DigitalC +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541046 +++$+++ 541047 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.215760320E09 +++$+++ I am sorry that you were offended by my opinion.  +++$+++ ::I am sorry that you were offended by my opinion. [[User:DigitalC|DigitalC]] ([[User talk:DigitalC|talk]]) 00:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
541049 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541046 +++$+++ 541048 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.215760680E09 +++$+++ I think that DigitalC is being gracious.  Carlossuarez, this comment of yours was an over-reaction,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:DigitalC&diff=prev&oldid=224916422] as was the AfD-ing of so many new stubs at once.  I would recommend that you consider refactoring your post to DigitalC, as I do not believe that he has been disruptive here. -- +++$+++ ::: I think that DigitalC is being gracious.  Carlossuarez, this comment of yours was an over-reaction,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DigitalC&diff=prev&oldid=224916422] as was the AfD-ing of so many new stubs at once.  I would recommend that you consider refactoring your post to DigitalC, as I do not believe that he has been disruptive here. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 00:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
541050 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541046 +++$+++ 541048 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.215764820E09 +++$+++ In my view, and those of the others working on scientific journals, we should probably have articles on every significant peer-reviewed journal in the major indexes (or perhaps on all 50,000 or so peer-reviewed journals, though I am not totally convinced of that myself), and on all the major trade magazines. there's no dilemma at all. Articles of the nature \"XYZ exists\" are simply incomplete stubs. I am supplementing as many as I can with additional information, but would have preferred to do it on a non-emergency basis. It would have been much better to try to improve them, not nominate them for deletion.  ''' +++$+++ :::In my view, and those of the others working on scientific journals, we should probably have articles on every significant peer-reviewed journal in the major indexes (or perhaps on all 50,000 or so peer-reviewed journals, though I am not totally convinced of that myself), and on all the major trade magazines. there's no dilemma at all. Articles of the nature "XYZ exists" are simply incomplete stubs. I am supplementing as many as I can with additional information, but would have preferred to do it on a non-emergency basis. It would have been much better to try to improve them, not nominate them for deletion.  '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 01:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
541051 +++$+++ ImperfectlyInformed +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541046 +++$+++ 541047 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.215766020E09 +++$+++ Agree with all of the above. You're sort of being careless with people's time. [[Seminars of Integrative Medicine]], which only existed for 2 years, is appropriate for a PROD. Why not hit it with a PROD then, rather than making us all post our comments on them? Most of the others appear notable, however, and it would be nice if you helped flesh them out.  +++$+++ ::Agree with all of the above. You're sort of being careless with people's time. [[Seminars of Integrative Medicine]], which only existed for 2 years, is appropriate for a PROD. Why not hit it with a PROD then, rather than making us all post our comments on them? Most of the others appear notable, however, and it would be nice if you helped flesh them out. [[User:ImperfectlyInformed|<span style="font-family: Times">II</span>]] | ([[User_talk:ImperfectlyInformed|t]] - [[Special:Contributions/ImperfectlyInformed|c]]) 01:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
541052 +++$+++ WhatamIdoing +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541046 +++$+++ 541051 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.215774000E09 +++$+++ It's also generally considered appropriate to spend a few seconds doing a little research before starting an AfD on a substub -- especially when, as these do, the stubs contain clickable links, which means that it's already [[WP:V|referenced]].  As it is, you've decided to save yourself the trouble of doing even the most basic level of research, such as running an internet search on the name of the journal, at the cost of inflicting AfD defenses on half a dozen editors for the perceived deficits of these two-day-old stubs.  At minimum, I think you've been careless about creating extra work on uninvolved editors, and I hope that in the future you will think through the consequences a little more carefully.   +++$+++ :::It's also generally considered appropriate to spend a few seconds doing a little research before starting an AfD on a substub -- especially when, as these do, the stubs contain clickable links, which means that it's already [[WP:V|referenced]].  As it is, you've decided to save yourself the trouble of doing even the most basic level of research, such as running an internet search on the name of the journal, at the cost of inflicting AfD defenses on half a dozen editors for the perceived deficits of these two-day-old stubs.  At minimum, I think you've been careless about creating extra work on uninvolved editors, and I hope that in the future you will think through the consequences a little more carefully.  [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 04:00, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
541053 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541046 +++$+++ 541047 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.215813780E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid I have to agree, try using [http:\/\/www.google.com\/ Google] next time.  +++$+++ ::I'm afraid I have to agree, try using [http://www.google.com/ Google] next time. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 15:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
541054 +++$+++ Medicellis +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541046 +++$+++ 541047 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.215907800E09 +++$+++ '''STRONG AGREE''' with all the above....it takes 2 seconds to do a little research and less disruptive instead of putting your own [[POV]] on such [[WP:N]] and [[WP:V]].  like whatamIdoing stated it takes 2 seconds of looking google the articles and find this information out.  +++$+++ :: '''STRONG AGREE''' with all the above....it takes 2 seconds to do a little research and less disruptive instead of putting your own [[POV]] on such [[WP:N]] and [[WP:V]].  like whatamIdoing stated it takes 2 seconds of looking google the articles and find this information out. [[User:Medicellis|Medicellis]] ([[User talk:Medicellis|talk]]) 17:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
541055 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541046 +++$+++ 541054 +++$+++ 2008-07-12 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.215913680E09 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46, I have to admit that I am somewhat disappointed with your response to the concerns here.  As I'm sure you know, Wikipedia runs on [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]].  The clear \"will of the community\", as demonstrated by all of the AfDs,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Current_Pharmaceutical_Design][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Dynamic_Chiropractic][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/The_Journal_of_Manual_%26_Manipulative_Therapy][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Pain_Research_%26_Management][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Best_Practice_%26_Research:_Clinical_Rheumatology][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Evidence-based_Complementary_and_Alternative_Medicine:_eCAM][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Scoliosis_%28journal%29][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Headache_%28journal%29][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/The_Australian_Journal_of_Physiotherapy][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Journal_of_Pain_and_Symptom_Management][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Europa_Medicophysica][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/The_Journal_of_Chiropractic_Education][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Culture%2C_Medicine_and_Psychiatry][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Current_Pharmaceutical_Design][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/The_Clinical_Journal_of_Pain][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Chiropractic_%26_Osteopathy][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Paediatric_Nursing] plus these direct comments on your talkpage, is that the multiple AfDs were not appropriate. Yet your response here, rather than acknowledging consensus, is to remain unapologetic, and indeed, somewhat combative.  Please reconsider your actions.  Especially as you are an administrator, it is very important that you set a good example in how you deal with disputes.  The proper course of action here, would be for you to graciously acknowledge the concerns of the respected editors and administrators on your talkpage, and apologize for wasting anyone's time. You should also assure the community that you have learned from this and will not repeat the same mistake in the future. If you disagree with the consensus, that is your right, but please do acknowledge it. Thanks, -- +++$+++ ::: Carlossuarez46, I have to admit that I am somewhat disappointed with your response to the concerns here.  As I'm sure you know, Wikipedia runs on [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]].  The clear "will of the community", as demonstrated by all of the AfDs,[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Current_Pharmaceutical_Design][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dynamic_Chiropractic][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Journal_of_Manual_%26_Manipulative_Therapy][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pain_Research_%26_Management][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Best_Practice_%26_Research:_Clinical_Rheumatology][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Evidence-based_Complementary_and_Alternative_Medicine:_eCAM][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Scoliosis_%28journal%29][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Headache_%28journal%29][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Australian_Journal_of_Physiotherapy][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Journal_of_Pain_and_Symptom_Management][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Europa_Medicophysica][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Journal_of_Chiropractic_Education][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Culture%2C_Medicine_and_Psychiatry][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Current_Pharmaceutical_Design][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Clinical_Journal_of_Pain][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chiropractic_%26_Osteopathy][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paediatric_Nursing] plus these direct comments on your talkpage, is that the multiple AfDs were not appropriate. Yet your response here, rather than acknowledging consensus, is to remain unapologetic, and indeed, somewhat combative.  Please reconsider your actions.  Especially as you are an administrator, it is very important that you set a good example in how you deal with disputes.  The proper course of action here, would be for you to graciously acknowledge the concerns of the respected editors and administrators on your talkpage, and apologize for wasting anyone's time. You should also assure the community that you have learned from this and will not repeat the same mistake in the future. If you disagree with the consensus, that is your right, but please do acknowledge it. Thanks, --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 18:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

264937 +++$+++  +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264937 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-30 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.159679220E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 22:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
264938 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264937 +++$+++ 264937 +++$+++ 2006-09-30 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.159680180E09 +++$+++ I have added a GDFL license  +++$+++ :I have added a GDFL license [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 22:23, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

570772 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.153314660E09 +++$+++ Hello Dfrg.msc. Please do not post nonsense to user or article talk pages. Article talk pages, in particular, are meant for collaboration towards the improvement of the article. Posting random anagrams of \"Jimbo Wales\" does not accomplish this. \/\/ [<small>[[WP:ADMIN|admin]]<\/small>]  +++$+++ Hello Dfrg.msc. Please do not post nonsense to user or article talk pages. Article talk pages, in particular, are meant for collaboration towards the improvement of the article. Posting random anagrams of "Jimbo Wales" does not accomplish this. // [<small>[[WP:ADMIN|admin]]</small>] [[User:Pathoschild/s|Pathoschild]] (<sup>''[[User_Talk:Pathoschild/s|talk]]''</sup>/<sub>[[m:User:Pathoschild|map]]</sub>) 06:11, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
570773 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570772 +++$+++ 570772 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.153315140E09 +++$+++ Sound advise which I will follow from now on. Thankyou for you consern,  +++$+++ * Sound advise which I will follow from now on. Thankyou for you consern, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.msc]] 06:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
570774 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570772 +++$+++ 570773 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.153316400E09 +++$+++ : Thank you for your understanding. \/\/ [<small>[[WP:ADMIN|admin]]<\/small>]  +++$+++ *: Thank you for your understanding. // [<small>[[WP:ADMIN|admin]]</small>] [[User:Pathoschild/s|Pathoschild]] (<sup>''[[User_Talk:Pathoschild/s|talk]]''</sup>/<sub>[[m:User:Pathoschild|map]]</sub>) 06:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

278906 +++$+++ Kitabparast +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.155248100E09 +++$+++ Until I receive your wise advice--you surely gave the gift of wisdom from the Holy Spirit--I will work on adding the ''Devan\u0101gir\u012b'' to the [[Roman Urdu]] table. Yours in Christ Jesus, khoda hafez,  +++$+++ Until I receive your wise advice--you surely gave the gift of wisdom from the Holy Spirit--I will work on adding the ''Devanāgirī'' to the [[Roman Urdu]] table. Yours in Christ Jesus, khoda hafez, [[User:Kitabparast|Kitabparast]] 15:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
278907 +++$+++ Kitabparast +++$+++ Anupam +++$+++ 278906 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.155318600E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, bhai saheb! I'm going to be leaving Karachi in a few hours to return to the States. I'll revert the article, and will then add in the ''Nasta'l\u012bq'' on the one page and the ''Devan\u0101gar\u012b'' on the other once I get land. Thanks for your help, advice, and great spirit! Yours in Christ Jesus, Khuda hafiz,  +++$+++ **Thank you very much, bhai saheb! I'm going to be leaving Karachi in a few hours to return to the States. I'll revert the article, and will then add in the ''Nasta'līq'' on the one page and the ''Devanāgarī'' on the other once I get land. Thanks for your help, advice, and great spirit! Yours in Christ Jesus, Khuda hafiz, [[User:Kitabparast|Kitabparast]] 10:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

278909 +++$+++ Michael Hardy +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278909 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-07-23 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.090645980E09 +++$+++ If you ''must'' write out ''pi'' instead of using the lower-case Greek letter, why in the world would you capitalize it?  I've never seen it done that way.  It's always lower-case even when it's at the beginning of a sentence.  +++$+++ If you ''must'' write out ''pi'' instead of using the lower-case Greek letter, why in the world would you capitalize it?  I've never seen it done that way.  It's always lower-case even when it's at the beginning of a sentence. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 22:13, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
278910 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278909 +++$+++ 278909 +++$+++ 2004-07-24 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.090655940E09 +++$+++ Hi Michael, I only changed the title of the page because it was displaying as \"&pi\". Anyway ''pi'' is fine with me, as would be ''&pi;''.  As to why I capitalized it, I don't really know. After looking around a bit there are lots of examples of ''Pi'' on Wikipedia as well as other places on the web, but I have no strong feeling about which is standard.   +++$+++ :Hi Michael, I only changed the title of the page because it was displaying as "&pi". Anyway ''pi'' is fine with me, as would be ''&pi;''.  As to why I capitalized it, I don't really know. After looking around a bit there are lots of examples of ''Pi'' on Wikipedia as well as other places on the web, but I have no strong feeling about which is standard.  [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 00:59, Jul 24, 2004 (UTC)

278911 +++$+++ Erolos +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278911 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-07-29 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.091125560E09 +++$+++ There are currently severe technical problems with categories, so please be patient about your mistaken link (from the Helpdesk). Once the category problems are solved your problem will be too. - +++$+++ There are currently severe technical problems with categories, so please be patient about your mistaken link (from the Helpdesk). Once the category problems are solved your problem will be too. -[[User:Erolos|Erolos]] 11:26, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
278912 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278911 +++$+++ 278911 +++$+++ 2004-07-29 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.091134440E09 +++$+++ Erolos: Thanks  +++$+++ :Erolos: Thanks [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 13:54, Jul 29, 2004 (UTC)

278913 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278913 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-08-06 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.091791500E09 +++$+++ Hi Adam, how much more info needs to be added to the article [[Maeander River]] before we remove the stub tag? My opinion was that this is an adequate amount for the topic, but i'm new ;-).  Regards  +++$+++ Hi Adam, how much more info needs to be added to the article [[Maeander River]] before we remove the stub tag? My opinion was that this is an adequate amount for the topic, but i'm new ;-).  Regards [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 04:25, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC)
278914 +++$+++ Adam Bishop +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278913 +++$+++ 278913 +++$+++ 2004-08-06 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.091792100E09 +++$+++ Hi! I'm not sure how much more could be added...I guess stubs are kind of subjective, and it just looked like a stub to me.  You can remove the notice if you think it's as complete as it can be.  +++$+++ :Hi! I'm not sure how much more could be added...I guess stubs are kind of subjective, and it just looked like a stub to me.  You can remove the notice if you think it's as complete as it can be. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] 04:35, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

16770 +++$+++ Parsecboy +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16770 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-08 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.270716480E09 +++$+++ C'mon, Realkyhick, you should know better than [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGreatestCommonFactor&action=historysubmit&diff=354591501&oldid=354591400 this].  +++$+++ C'mon, Realkyhick, you should know better than [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGreatestCommonFactor&action=historysubmit&diff=354591501&oldid=354591400 this]. [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] ([[User talk:Parsecboy|talk]]) 01:48, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
16771 +++$+++ Parsecboy +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16770 +++$+++ 16770 +++$+++ 2010-04-08 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.270717500E09 +++$+++ Yeah, it's easy to get frustrated with these idiots. This one in particular has [[User talk:GoodOlRickyTicky2|been around]] for going on a year, if not longer.  +++$+++ :Yeah, it's easy to get frustrated with these idiots. This one in particular has [[User talk:GoodOlRickyTicky2|been around]] for going on a year, if not longer. [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] ([[User talk:Parsecboy|talk]]) 02:05, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
16772 +++$+++ Parsecboy +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16770 +++$+++ 16771 +++$+++ 2010-04-08 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.270723980E09 +++$+++ Well, [[Dr Santos]] and [[Dr. Santos]] (along with [[Aggubua]] and [[Agubua]]) have been [[WP:SALT|salted]], so really the only thing is to keep an eye out for similar edits (such as blanking a page with the edit summary \"this page no longer exists\") and variations on those article titles.  +++$+++ ::Well, [[Dr Santos]] and [[Dr. Santos]] (along with [[Aggubua]] and [[Agubua]]) have been [[WP:SALT|salted]], so really the only thing is to keep an eye out for similar edits (such as blanking a page with the edit summary "this page no longer exists") and variations on those article titles. [[User:Parsecboy|Parsecboy]] ([[User talk:Parsecboy|talk]]) 03:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

278916 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-08-11 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.092286980E09 +++$+++ Hi Michael, have you ever heard of this term before?  Does it have wide usage?  +++$+++ Hi Michael, have you ever heard of this term before?  Does it have wide usage? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 22:03, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)
278917 +++$+++ Michael Hardy +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278916 +++$+++ 278916 +++$+++ 2004-08-12 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.092300060E09 +++$+++ I have not frequently (if ever) encountered it other than in this Wikipedia article.  It seems the first 20 or so Google hits on it come from that article as well.  So if it's frequently used, I'd guess it's only within a relatively small philosophy-of-mathematics community.  +++$+++ :I have not frequently (if ever) encountered it other than in this Wikipedia article.  It seems the first 20 or so Google hits on it come from that article as well.  So if it's frequently used, I'd guess it's only within a relatively small philosophy-of-mathematics community. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 01:41, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

278918 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-08-12 06:54:00 +++$+++ 1.092318840E09 +++$+++ I've never heard of it either.  It was created by the same guy who created [[Folk mathematics]], and who both may be [[User:JRR Trollkien]].  I'm wondering if this is a made up term.   +++$+++ I've never heard of it either.  It was created by the same guy who created [[Folk mathematics]], and who both may be [[User:JRR Trollkien]].  I'm wondering if this is a made up term.  [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 06:54, Aug 12, 2004 (UTC)
278919 +++$+++ Gadykozma +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278918 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2004-08-17 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.092777240E09 +++$+++ FYI: I've VfD'ed it. [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion\/Finished mathematics]].  +++$+++ ::FYI: I've VfD'ed it. [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Finished mathematics]]. [[User:Gadykozma|Gadykozma]] 14:14, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

352321 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ 352321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-24 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.274726160E09 +++$+++ Hi Darwinek. I saw that you changed the category in that article from Czezh to Slovak footballers. I had problems in finding out which exact nationality he was, he played mostly in Slovak clubs ([[FC Spartak Trnava]] and [[M\u0160K \u017dilina]]) but on the other hand, the source in [http:\/\/www.playerhistory.com\/Default.aspx?page=player_details&playerID=151827|Playerhistory.com] says he is \"Czech\". How did you opted for \"Slovak\" in this case? What is the best way for finding out the correct nationality for these cases? Thanx, regards,  +++$+++ Hi Darwinek. I saw that you changed the category in that article from Czezh to Slovak footballers. I had problems in finding out which exact nationality he was, he played mostly in Slovak clubs ([[FC Spartak Trnava]] and [[MŠK Žilina]]) but on the other hand, the source in [http://www.playerhistory.com/Default.aspx?page=player_details&playerID=151827|Playerhistory.com] says he is "Czech". How did you opted for "Slovak" in this case? What is the best way for finding out the correct nationality for these cases? Thanx, regards, [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 11:36, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
352322 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ 352321 +++$+++ 352321 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.274729100E09 +++$+++ OK. I understand you perfectly. You also saying that Zvar\xedk is Slovak surname, right? I know that surnames are avoided to be used as guides for info, but they can obvioulsy be usefull when there aren\xb4t other sources... About sources, well, I found the \"\u010cesk\xfd a \u010deskoslovensk\xfd fotbal: lexikon osobnost\xed a klub\u016f : 1906-2006\" at Google Books, and I only used it for Zvar\xedk, for time being. I also understand you quite well when it comes about the stats from the 1980s or 1990s... I mean, come on!, it was not that long ago, but for the ones that didn\xb4t played for the national teams, is really hard! For exemple, I have the stats for Yugoslavia for the 1970s, 1980s and 2000s, but 1990s, not a chance! I\xb4m searching for the 90s for months now. I\xb4ll let you know if I find something.  +++$+++ :OK. I understand you perfectly. You also saying that Zvarík is Slovak surname, right? I know that surnames are avoided to be used as guides for info, but they can obvioulsy be usefull when there aren´t other sources... About sources, well, I found the "Český a československý fotbal: lexikon osobností a klubů : 1906-2006" at Google Books, and I only used it for Zvarík, for time being. I also understand you quite well when it comes about the stats from the 1980s or 1990s... I mean, come on!, it was not that long ago, but for the ones that didn´t played for the national teams, is really hard! For exemple, I have the stats for Yugoslavia for the 1970s, 1980s and 2000s, but 1990s, not a chance! I´m searching for the 90s for months now. I´ll let you know if I find something. [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 12:25, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
352323 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ 352321 +++$+++ 352322 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.274743260E09 +++$+++ I perfectly remember Banik being a champion... Following your story, the other day I decided to call a friend of my decesed grandfather to hear of him and ask him if he remembers of any foreign players back then, and he gave me a funny answer: \"You certainly have it all in detail on the internet, don\xb4t you?\" If he knew the reality... Regarding players careers, I know what you mean by having quite good players going to German 4 leagues, or so, but curiously, for me is even more annoying when I find out that I can get more easy the info from the German amateur league, than of some other 1st Leagues. For German lower leagues I usualy go to some club players lists at [http:\/\/www.statistik-klein.de|www.statistik-klein.de], there you have the club lists with players and their former clubs. For Czech football, despite having had a Czech grandfather (the other one from the already mentioned), I haven\xb4t had much time to work on, because I have been more concentrated on the Serbian\/Yugoslav football and the foreign players that played there, and we are probably talking here about some of the less importive leagues of Europe, probably, not so much because of lack of money, but because the two leagues (Czech and Serb) already have a fair amount of excellent domestic players. That is why I asked you about Zvar\xedk, because I had him wrongly as a Czech. There has not been many importing\/exporting between the two countries, but the fact is that at the begining of the football in hole Yugoslavia, the Czechs were the teachers. Some of those teachers are found under Czech or Slovak section in my [[User:FkpCascais\/Sandbox]]. Some of the most recent that I had tryied to make an article on, is a Slovak goalkeeper [[Michal Bal\xe1\u017e]]. There are websites with info on his career in Germany, but curiously, a goalkeeper with same name started playing in [[FK Vojvodina]], in 1990, much coincidence? And, since I\xb4m missing completely the 1990s, I don\xb4t know what happend then, if that was him, and if it was, where he played until he got to Germany, to Siegen, in 1998. Sorry for my long comment. :)  +++$+++ ::I perfectly remember Banik being a champion... Following your story, the other day I decided to call a friend of my decesed grandfather to hear of him and ask him if he remembers of any foreign players back then, and he gave me a funny answer: "You certainly have it all in detail on the internet, don´t you?" If he knew the reality... Regarding players careers, I know what you mean by having quite good players going to German 4 leagues, or so, but curiously, for me is even more annoying when I find out that I can get more easy the info from the German amateur league, than of some other 1st Leagues. For German lower leagues I usualy go to some club players lists at [http://www.statistik-klein.de|www.statistik-klein.de], there you have the club lists with players and their former clubs. For Czech football, despite having had a Czech grandfather (the other one from the already mentioned), I haven´t had much time to work on, because I have been more concentrated on the Serbian/Yugoslav football and the foreign players that played there, and we are probably talking here about some of the less importive leagues of Europe, probably, not so much because of lack of money, but because the two leagues (Czech and Serb) already have a fair amount of excellent domestic players. That is why I asked you about Zvarík, because I had him wrongly as a Czech. There has not been many importing/exporting between the two countries, but the fact is that at the begining of the football in hole Yugoslavia, the Czechs were the teachers. Some of those teachers are found under Czech or Slovak section in my [[User:FkpCascais/Sandbox]]. Some of the most recent that I had tryied to make an article on, is a Slovak goalkeeper [[Michal Baláž]]. There are websites with info on his career in Germany, but curiously, a goalkeeper with same name started playing in [[FK Vojvodina]], in 1990, much coincidence? And, since I´m missing completely the 1990s, I don´t know what happend then, if that was him, and if it was, where he played until he got to Germany, to Siegen, in 1998. Sorry for my long comment. :) [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 16:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
352324 +++$+++ FkpCascais +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ 352321 +++$+++ 352323 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.274749440E09 +++$+++ Starting from the end of your comment, my club is [[FK Partizan]]. The craziest fans back in the 1980s and 1990s. Your team? You reminded me of many current issues regarding football. For instance: Regional leagues? There has been a lot of talking lately about wheather a Yugoslav regional league would be a good or bad thing (or eventually Center-European). I did much thinking on the issue, and I still didn\xb4t decided. A regional league can be excellent for the major clubs, more competition, more public, but on the other hand, it may kill the medium football centers, some of which just begin standing back on their feet. Regarding the past, old Yugoslavia had a strange law (until 1992) that allowed players to go abroad after 27 years, so almost all usually used to go somwhere. Some currently would like that law to be back on place, not me, but is just impossible. I\xb4m not sure if you are aware, but specially among Serbs, there has been an extreme feeling of injustice regarding football. Just when Yugoslavia had probably its best team, in the begining of the 1990s, the sanctions were imposed, and Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro, others could as independent) was not allowed to participate in the EURO92 (won by his substitute, Denmark), WC94 and EURO96, allmost aniquilating an entire generation. Red Star had also just had won the Champions Cup, and after a year had been under sanctions for all those years, as well. The clubs without international competitions just sold all players, begining with the massive exodus. This participation in WC is somehow an oportunity to return the old respect others used to have. But, the group is extremely hard! I\xb4m more affraid of Australia than of Germany, and I don\xb4t need to say nothing about Ghana, I supose. I was, on the other hand, curios about Slovakia. They already deserved a participation for a long time now. Regarding Czech football, I feel as some kind of crisis is going on, in society as well, I think, am I right?  +++$+++ :::Starting from the end of your comment, my club is [[FK Partizan]]. The craziest fans back in the 1980s and 1990s. Your team? You reminded me of many current issues regarding football. For instance: Regional leagues? There has been a lot of talking lately about wheather a Yugoslav regional league would be a good or bad thing (or eventually Center-European). I did much thinking on the issue, and I still didn´t decided. A regional league can be excellent for the major clubs, more competition, more public, but on the other hand, it may kill the medium football centers, some of which just begin standing back on their feet. Regarding the past, old Yugoslavia had a strange law (until 1992) that allowed players to go abroad after 27 years, so almost all usually used to go somwhere. Some currently would like that law to be back on place, not me, but is just impossible. I´m not sure if you are aware, but specially among Serbs, there has been an extreme feeling of injustice regarding football. Just when Yugoslavia had probably its best team, in the begining of the 1990s, the sanctions were imposed, and Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro, others could as independent) was not allowed to participate in the EURO92 (won by his substitute, Denmark), WC94 and EURO96, allmost aniquilating an entire generation. Red Star had also just had won the Champions Cup, and after a year had been under sanctions for all those years, as well. The clubs without international competitions just sold all players, begining with the massive exodus. This participation in WC is somehow an oportunity to return the old respect others used to have. But, the group is extremely hard! I´m more affraid of Australia than of Germany, and I don´t need to say nothing about Ghana, I supose. I was, on the other hand, curios about Slovakia. They already deserved a participation for a long time now. Regarding Czech football, I feel as some kind of crisis is going on, in society as well, I think, am I right? [[User:FkpCascais|FkpCascais]] ([[User talk:FkpCascais|talk]]) 18:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

16776 +++$+++ Imagi-King +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16776 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-13 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.271200740E09 +++$+++ I haven't apologised on your behalf. I'm just sorry for their sake that the other editors have to put up with your ridiculous and unnecessarily negative accusations of passive aggression, and indeed my defenses to the contrary. It's entirely irrelevant and unfounded, and I wish you'd keep it out of the discussion at hand. Many thanks.  +++$+++ I haven't apologised on your behalf. I'm just sorry for their sake that the other editors have to put up with your ridiculous and unnecessarily negative accusations of passive aggression, and indeed my defenses to the contrary. It's entirely irrelevant and unfounded, and I wish you'd keep it out of the discussion at hand. Many thanks. [[User:Imagi-King|Baron Ronan Doyle of Sealand]] ([[User talk:Imagi-King|talk]]) 16:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
16777 +++$+++ Imagi-King +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16776 +++$+++ 16776 +++$+++ 2010-04-13 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.271216880E09 +++$+++ And there you go again with your unbased assumptions. That bubble of ignorance must be jolly comfortable. I don't enjoy interaction with childish hypocrites, so I'll say goodbye now.  +++$+++ :And there you go again with your unbased assumptions. That bubble of ignorance must be jolly comfortable. I don't enjoy interaction with childish hypocrites, so I'll say goodbye now. [[User:Imagi-King|Baron Ronan Doyle of Sealand]] ([[User talk:Imagi-King|talk]]) 20:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
16778 +++$+++ Imagi-King +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16776 +++$+++ 16777 +++$+++ 2010-04-13 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.271218080E09 +++$+++ The only issue is your enduring rudeness. Put your personal dislike aside. DRV has reached a pretty clear consensus.  +++$+++ ::The only issue is your enduring rudeness. Put your personal dislike aside. DRV has reached a pretty clear consensus. [[User:Imagi-King|Baron Ronan Doyle of Sealand]] ([[User talk:Imagi-King|talk]]) 21:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
16779 +++$+++ Imagi-King +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16776 +++$+++ 16778 +++$+++ 2010-04-14 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.271301240E09 +++$+++ That may indeed be the case, and I'll be happy to acquiesce should that be the outcome. Until then, however, I politely ask that you refrain from insulting my contributions as an editor. If nothing else, DRV appears to have decided that I was '''not''' in the wrong when reposting the article to mainspace, as it had been considerably improved. What I would like primarily is for you to accept that and discontinue your accusations of, among other things, spamming. Please consider how unhelpful it is. I have faith that you know better.  +++$+++ :::That may indeed be the case, and I'll be happy to acquiesce should that be the outcome. Until then, however, I politely ask that you refrain from insulting my contributions as an editor. If nothing else, DRV appears to have decided that I was '''not''' in the wrong when reposting the article to mainspace, as it had been considerably improved. What I would like primarily is for you to accept that and discontinue your accusations of, among other things, spamming. Please consider how unhelpful it is. I have faith that you know better. [[User:Imagi-King|Baron Ronan Doyle of Sealand]] ([[User talk:Imagi-King|talk]]) 20:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

278921 +++$+++ Wshun +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-09-02 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.094156280E09 +++$+++ Oh, my creations are finally get rid of by you!  Nice drawings, thanks. :P - +++$+++ Oh, my creations are finally get rid of by you!  Nice drawings, thanks. :P -[[User:Wshun|wshun]] 13:18, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
278922 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278921 +++$+++ 278921 +++$+++ 2004-09-02 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.094156940E09 +++$+++ Thankyou, I'm glad you like them ;-) However I seem to be having a problem with them not \"floating\" properly, under some browsers (they look fine to me with Safari), unless I \"thumb\" or \"frame\" them.  Does the image placement look ok to you?  Framing doesn't seem quite right for diagrams see [[subset]] for an example. Any ideas?  +++$+++ :Thankyou, I'm glad you like them ;-) However I seem to be having a problem with them not "floating" properly, under some browsers (they look fine to me with Safari), unless I "thumb" or "frame" them.  Does the image placement look ok to you?  Framing doesn't seem quite right for diagrams see [[subset]] for an example. Any ideas? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 13:29, Sep 2, 2004 (UTC)
278923 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278921 +++$+++ 278921 +++$+++ 2004-09-03 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.094251140E09 +++$+++ are no longer being used should we delete them?  +++$+++ :are no longer being used should we delete them? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 15:39, Sep 3, 2004 (UTC)

46487 +++$+++ Kung Fu Man +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46487 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-15 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.253075580E09 +++$+++ Combining the two would help bolster the final article significantly, and give some much needed reception to Red's article from the various sources Ash also utilizes, much like it did for Mewtwo. What do you think?-- +++$+++ Combining the two would help bolster the final article significantly, and give some much needed reception to Red's article from the various sources Ash also utilizes, much like it did for Mewtwo. What do you think?--[[User:Kung Fu Man|Kung Fu Man]] ([[User talk:Kung Fu Man|talk]]) 21:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
46488 +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46487 +++$+++ 46487 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.253075820E09 +++$+++ My reply [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Kung_Fu_Man&diff=314197786&oldid=314005606 here]. ''' +++$+++ :My reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kung_Fu_Man&diff=314197786&oldid=314005606 here]. '''[[User:Artichoker|<span style="color:#064">Artichoker</span>]]'''<sup>['''[[User talk:Artichoker|<span style="color:#000">talk</span>]]''']</sup> 21:37, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
46489 +++$+++ Kung Fu Man +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46487 +++$+++ 46488 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.253085420E09 +++$+++ [[User:Tintor2]] actually pointed out something and he's right: Red doesn't just need reception, he has none. I was proposing this under the idea that Blue and Gary were being treated as the same character and would have reception as well, however it not only doesn't seem the case there, but the article was already really chopped into separate parts anyway, someone just hadn't done something to removed Blue's article. I turned it into a disambig page to finish things and save headaches. In light of this, I'm going to go ahead and merge Red, which'll make Ash the primary. Kinda unprecedented but we don't have many cases where one character ends up more notable than later incarnations too often...-- +++$+++ ::[[User:Tintor2]] actually pointed out something and he's right: Red doesn't just need reception, he has none. I was proposing this under the idea that Blue and Gary were being treated as the same character and would have reception as well, however it not only doesn't seem the case there, but the article was already really chopped into separate parts anyway, someone just hadn't done something to removed Blue's article. I turned it into a disambig page to finish things and save headaches. In light of this, I'm going to go ahead and merge Red, which'll make Ash the primary. Kinda unprecedented but we don't have many cases where one character ends up more notable than later incarnations too often...--[[User:Kung Fu Man|Kung Fu Man]] ([[User talk:Kung Fu Man|talk]]) 00:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

541068 +++$+++ Texas Whitt +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541068 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-29 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.217334360E09 +++$+++ I don't know how to nominate something on afd yet, but I guess I could look it up. But I was looking at [[Wikipedia:Notability (Geographic locations)]].  It says, \"A sub-section of a human settlement, such as a district of a town, should normally be incorporated in the article about the settlement it is located in, unless it has exceptional notability of its own, or unless it constitutes a unit of local government.\" This is just a subdivision.  It's not even a whole \"district\" of a town.-- +++$+++ I don't know how to nominate something on afd yet, but I guess I could look it up. But I was looking at [[Wikipedia:Notability (Geographic locations)]].  It says, "A sub-section of a human settlement, such as a district of a town, should normally be incorporated in the article about the settlement it is located in, unless it has exceptional notability of its own, or unless it constitutes a unit of local government." This is just a subdivision.  It's not even a whole "district" of a town.--[[User:Texas Whitt|Texas Whitt]] ([[User talk:Texas Whitt|talk]]) 05:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
541069 +++$+++ Phlegm Rooster +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541068 +++$+++ 541068 +++$+++ 2008-07-29 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.217336640E09 +++$+++ I've redirected it.  +++$+++ *I've redirected it. [[User:Phlegm Rooster|Phlegm Rooster]] ([[User talk:Phlegm Rooster|talk]]) 06:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

16782 +++$+++ Scapler +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16782 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-21 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.271907180E09 +++$+++ I removed the prod from the article, as the BLPprod is only supposed to be used on articles about living people. If you had read what you were tagging, you would have seen that he fought in the American Revolution in the 1700s, and the last sentence mentions his burial. He is clearly dead. \u304b\u3093\u3071\u3044\uff01  +++$+++ I removed the prod from the article, as the BLPprod is only supposed to be used on articles about living people. If you had read what you were tagging, you would have seen that he fought in the American Revolution in the 1700s, and the last sentence mentions his burial. He is clearly dead. かんぱい！ [[User:Scapler|Scapler]] ([[User talk:Scapler#top|talk]]) 20:33, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
16783 +++$+++ Scapler +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16782 +++$+++ 16782 +++$+++ 2010-04-21 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.271908140E09 +++$+++ I am sorry if I came off rude, I did not mean to. I worded that rather poorly. Friends? \u304b\u3093\u3071\u3044\uff01  +++$+++ :I am sorry if I came off rude, I did not mean to. I worded that rather poorly. Friends? かんぱい！ [[User:Scapler|Scapler]] ([[User talk:Scapler#top|talk]]) 20:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
16784 +++$+++ JCbot +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16782 +++$+++ 16782 +++$+++ 2010-04-26 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.272337200E09 +++$+++ \u2014<\/small>  +++$+++ : —</small> [[User:JCbot|JCbot]] ([[User talk:JCbot|talk]]) 20:00, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

483395 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-26 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.190875380E09 +++$+++ This one has some of the flavour of his style. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Nippy_jones] - +++$+++ This one has some of the flavour of his style. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Nippy_jones] -[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 23:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
483396 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483395 +++$+++ 483395 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.190876880E09 +++$+++ And look what [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/149.4.110.133 this anonymous IP] was doing. I guess since the Mike caragliano id is blocked... -- +++$+++ :And look what [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/149.4.110.133 this anonymous IP] was doing. I guess since the Mike caragliano id is blocked... --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 00:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
483397 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483395 +++$+++ 483396 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.190878380E09 +++$+++ Yes, that first one would be his kind of edit. I have to give him some credit, as not that many fans remember [[Nippy Jones]], who was best remembered for the shoe polish incident in the [[1957 World Series]]. I don't know what's up with that second one. That kind of thing is not really his style, but I'm fairly convinced he's got a screw or two loose, so there's no telling.  +++$+++ ::Yes, that first one would be his kind of edit. I have to give him some credit, as not that many fans remember [[Nippy Jones]], who was best remembered for the shoe polish incident in the [[1957 World Series]]. I don't know what's up with that second one. That kind of thing is not really his style, but I'm fairly convinced he's got a screw or two loose, so there's no telling. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 00:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
483398 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483395 +++$+++ 483397 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.190878500E09 +++$+++ I whacked 'em both and sprotected everything.  And no, I never heard of Nippy Jones.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::I whacked 'em both and sprotected everything.  And no, I never heard of Nippy Jones.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 00:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
483399 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483395 +++$+++ 483398 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.190879280E09 +++$+++ Nippy Jones was with the Braves, at bat in a key situation. He jumped back from a low pitch, and the umpire called a ball. He protested that it had hit his foot, the shoe polish mark proved it, and he was sent to first base. I think this was an important play in the deciding game. Also, as I recall, the unrelated [[Cleon Jones]] was awarded first base for the same reason, probably in the [[1969 World Series]]. The Nippy Jones incident was a little before my time, but I read about it somewhere, probably in the 1961 Gillette special, ''World Series Encyclopedia''. Gillette was a Series TV sponsor and they used to publish nifty stuff like that. That's where my interest in the game's history really started. Liebman would have been in his early teens in 1957, and as a Yankees' fan, it would have been one of those things you remember painfully.  +++$+++ ::::Nippy Jones was with the Braves, at bat in a key situation. He jumped back from a low pitch, and the umpire called a ball. He protested that it had hit his foot, the shoe polish mark proved it, and he was sent to first base. I think this was an important play in the deciding game. Also, as I recall, the unrelated [[Cleon Jones]] was awarded first base for the same reason, probably in the [[1969 World Series]]. The Nippy Jones incident was a little before my time, but I read about it somewhere, probably in the 1961 Gillette special, ''World Series Encyclopedia''. Gillette was a Series TV sponsor and they used to publish nifty stuff like that. That's where my interest in the game's history really started. Liebman would have been in his early teens in 1957, and as a Yankees' fan, it would have been one of those things you remember painfully. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 00:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
483400 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483395 +++$+++ 483399 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.190879460E09 +++$+++ It was actually in Game 4, and the guy who ran for Jones scored the tying run before Ed Mathews (as \"[[User:Edison mathews]]\", another of Liebman's recent socks) \"socked\" a game-winning homer to tie the Series.  +++$+++ :::::It was actually in Game 4, and the guy who ran for Jones scored the tying run before Ed Mathews (as "[[User:Edison mathews]]", another of Liebman's recent socks) "socked" a game-winning homer to tie the Series. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 00:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

16788 +++$+++ Siva1979 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-05 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.273055820E09 +++$+++ Hi admin! I hope you are fine. I am just wondering why you placed a speedy deletion tag on [[Betinternet]]? I am sure that it does not deserve a speedy deletion tag. At the most, if the [[WP:NOTABLE|notability]] of the article is in doubt, it should be listed in [[WP:AfD]] if you do not think that this company deserves an article on [[Wikipedia]]. This is a reputable and notable company and I have also provided references to this article. Your comments on this issue will be much appreciated and please leave a reply on my [[User talk:Siva1979|talk page]]. Cheers! --<font style=\"background:gold\">[[WP:ESP|<font color=\"green\">S<\/font>]] +++$+++ Hi admin! I hope you are fine. I am just wondering why you placed a speedy deletion tag on [[Betinternet]]? I am sure that it does not deserve a speedy deletion tag. At the most, if the [[WP:NOTABLE|notability]] of the article is in doubt, it should be listed in [[WP:AfD]] if you do not think that this company deserves an article on [[Wikipedia]]. This is a reputable and notable company and I have also provided references to this article. Your comments on this issue will be much appreciated and please leave a reply on my [[User talk:Siva1979|talk page]]. Cheers! --<font style="background:gold">[[WP:ESP|<font color="green">S</font>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">[[User talk:Siva1979|Talk to me]]</font></sup> 03:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)03:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
16789 +++$+++ Siva1979 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16788 +++$+++ 16788 +++$+++ 2010-05-05 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.273072320E09 +++$+++ I have added a second reference to my article in question. I don't think that this article deserves a [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]]. At the most, if you are unsure about its notability, it should be listed in [[WP:AfD]]. I shall provide more reference and content to this article in the near future. --<font style=\"background:gold\">[[WP:ESP|<font color=\"green\">S<\/font>]] +++$+++ :I have added a second reference to my article in question. I don't think that this article deserves a [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]]. At the most, if you are unsure about its notability, it should be listed in [[WP:AfD]]. I shall provide more reference and content to this article in the near future. --<font style="background:gold">[[WP:ESP|<font color="green">S</font>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">[[User talk:Siva1979|Talk to me]]</font></sup> 08:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
16790 +++$+++ Siva1979 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16788 +++$+++ 16789 +++$+++ 2010-05-05 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.273073940E09 +++$+++ There are now a total of <s>5<\/s>6 different references to this article. I think that it is pretty clear by now that this article do not deserve to be speedy deleted. --<font style=\"background:gold\">[[WP:ESP|<font color=\"green\">S<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::There are now a total of <s>5</s>6 different references to this article. I think that it is pretty clear by now that this article do not deserve to be speedy deleted. --<font style="background:gold">[[WP:ESP|<font color="green">S</font>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">[[User talk:Siva1979|Talk to me]]</font></sup> 08:39, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
16791 +++$+++ Siva1979 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16788 +++$+++ 16790 +++$+++ 2010-05-05 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.273077660E09 +++$+++ This gaming company also operates to over 154 countries world wide from the [[Isle of Man]]. Doesn't this make it notable? At the very least, this article does not deserve to have a speedy delete tag. --<font style=\"background:gold\">[[WP:ESP|<font color=\"green\">S<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::This gaming company also operates to over 154 countries world wide from the [[Isle of Man]]. Doesn't this make it notable? At the very least, this article does not deserve to have a speedy delete tag. --<font style="background:gold">[[WP:ESP|<font color="green">S</font>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">[[User talk:Siva1979|Talk to me]]</font></sup> 09:41, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
16792 +++$+++ Siva1979 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16788 +++$+++ 16791 +++$+++ 2010-05-05 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.273103760E09 +++$+++ Well, I fixed this issue. Is this enough to remove the speedy deletion tag? --<font style=\"background:gold\">[[WP:ESP|<font color=\"green\">S<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::::Well, I fixed this issue. Is this enough to remove the speedy deletion tag? --<font style="background:gold">[[WP:ESP|<font color="green">S</font>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">[[User talk:Siva1979|Talk to me]]</font></sup> 16:56, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
16793 +++$+++ Siva1979 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16788 +++$+++ 16792 +++$+++ 2010-05-05 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.273106520E09 +++$+++ But unfortunately, that editor in question is NOT an admin! --<font style=\"background:gold\">[[WP:ESP|<font color=\"green\">S<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::::But unfortunately, that editor in question is NOT an admin! --<font style="background:gold">[[WP:ESP|<font color="green">S</font>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">[[User talk:Siva1979|Talk to me]]</font></sup> 17:42, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

278933 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278933 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-09-30 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.096603440E09 +++$+++ Hi, In case you're un-aware, I thought you might be interested in the the edits going on at [[Opera Company of Boston]].  You also might want to look at [[Opera Boston]] and [[Boston Lyric Opera]].  +++$+++ Hi, In case you're un-aware, I thought you might be interested in the the edits going on at [[Opera Company of Boston]].  You also might want to look at [[Opera Boston]] and [[Boston Lyric Opera]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 21:04, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
278934 +++$+++ Viajero +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278933 +++$+++ 278933 +++$+++ 2004-10-01 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.096678200E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for your heads up about the Boston opera articles. I have reverted the changes, and removed the Boston Opera Company from Cleanup. This anon user clearly has an axe to grind; his\/her contributions were highly unencyclopedic. Of course the articles could use some additional material, but that will have to wait until someone with a more balanced POV comes along. PS Whereabouts in Cambridge to you live? I was born and grew up there. --   +++$+++ :Hi, thanks for your heads up about the Boston opera articles. I have reverted the changes, and removed the Boston Opera Company from Cleanup. This anon user clearly has an axe to grind; his/her contributions were highly unencyclopedic. Of course the articles could use some additional material, but that will have to wait until someone with a more balanced POV comes along. PS Whereabouts in Cambridge to you live? I was born and grew up there. --  [[User:Viajero|Viajero]] 17:50, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

16794 +++$+++ ScottyBerg +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-26 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.274927640E09 +++$+++ I've just proposed a speedy as \"pure vandalism.\" I think that category applies. If not, then that's one of those \"fall through the cracks\" situations that requires fixing in the CSD criteria.  +++$+++ I've just proposed a speedy as "pure vandalism." I think that category applies. If not, then that's one of those "fall through the cracks" situations that requires fixing in the CSD criteria. [[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 19:34, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
16795 +++$+++ ScottyBerg +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16794 +++$+++ 16794 +++$+++ 2010-05-26 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.274927880E09 +++$+++ Yeah, let's see what happens. I've started a subpage with examples of SD loopholes, for future reference.  +++$+++ :Yeah, let's see what happens. I've started a subpage with examples of SD loopholes, for future reference. [[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 19:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
16796 +++$+++ ScottyBerg +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16794 +++$+++ 16795 +++$+++ 2010-05-26 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.274935920E09 +++$+++ Just deleted. Turns out A7 covers animals, so it's not really a loophole. Go figure.  +++$+++ ::Just deleted. Turns out A7 covers animals, so it's not really a loophole. Go figure. [[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 21:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

278939 +++$+++ Gene Ward Smith +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278939 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-11-01 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.099322580E09 +++$+++ Good! I've not made as many contributions as AxelBoldt or Charles Matthews, but mine are pretty substantial by now.  +++$+++ Good! I've not made as many contributions as AxelBoldt or Charles Matthews, but mine are pretty substantial by now. [[User:Gene Ward Smith|Gene Ward Smith]] 07:23, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
278940 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278939 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2004-11-01 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.099368540E09 +++$+++ All of the text in this section was deleted by you on Oct 16th  (see: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/wiki.phtml?title=Infinity&action=history edit history]) leaving this version of the article [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/wiki.phtml?title=Infinity&oldid=6687618] correct? Your edits on Oct 31st added back this content. My concerns were about edits of Oct 16th.  +++$+++ ::All of the text in this section was deleted by you on Oct 16th  (see: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Infinity&action=history edit history]) leaving this version of the article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Infinity&oldid=6687618] correct? Your edits on Oct 31st added back this content. My concerns were about edits of Oct 16th. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 20:09, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)
278941 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278939 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2004-11-01 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.099368540E09 +++$+++ This was removed on Oct 16th, it was edited and added back on the 31st, correct? (see above)  +++$+++ ::This was removed on Oct 16th, it was edited and added back on the 31st, correct? (see above) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 20:09, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)
278942 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278939 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2004-11-01 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.099369680E09 +++$+++ Perhaps I've made a wrong assumption. Looking at the edit history, I've assumed that your first edit to this article occurred on Oct16. Is that correct? If so then this did not get \"dumped in after\" you made your edits. This content was present in the article well before Oct 16th. Did you perhaps make edits before the 16th under a different user name?  +++$+++ ::Perhaps I've made a wrong assumption. Looking at the edit history, I've assumed that your first edit to this article occurred on Oct16. Is that correct? If so then this did not get "dumped in after" you made your edits. This content was present in the article well before Oct 16th. Did you perhaps make edits before the 16th under a different user name? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 20:28, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)
278943 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278939 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2004-11-01 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.099369680E09 +++$+++ you know what they say about two wrongs not making a right ;-)  +++$+++ :: you know what they say about two wrongs not making a right ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 20:28, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)
278944 +++$+++ Gene Ward Smith +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278939 +++$+++ 278939 +++$+++ 2004-11-01 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.099371780E09 +++$+++ You should, however, consider that you played your own role in this debacle; despite recognizing the value of my edits, you allowed them to be reverted, and then futher editing work took place on this reverted version. This was obviously the wrong plan, and that it lead to problems was predictable. I think it would be helpful in the future not to allow such things to happen.  +++$+++ :You should, however, consider that you played your own role in this debacle; despite recognizing the value of my edits, you allowed them to be reverted, and then futher editing work took place on this reverted version. This was obviously the wrong plan, and that it lead to problems was predictable. I think it would be helpful in the future not to allow such things to happen. [[User:Gene Ward Smith|Gene Ward Smith]] 21:03, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

46490 +++$+++ Sesu Prime +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-16 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.253094300E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I was thrown off too because the bots haven't gotten around to updating the relevant pages yet (adding the FA star to the article, for example), but as long as it's [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_articles&diff=314147663&oldid=313997151 listed] on [[WP:Featured articles]], it's officially an FA. Cheers. - +++$+++ Yeah, I was thrown off too because the bots haven't gotten around to updating the relevant pages yet (adding the FA star to the article, for example), but as long as it's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_articles&diff=314147663&oldid=313997151 listed] on [[WP:Featured articles]], it's officially an FA. Cheers. -[[User:Sesu Prime|'''<font color="#0000cd">sesu</font>''']][[User talk:Sesu Prime|'''<font color="#b22222">PRIME</font>''']] 02:45, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
46491 +++$+++ Sesu Prime +++$+++ Artichoker +++$+++ 46490 +++$+++ 46490 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.253095440E09 +++$+++ No problem. I see by reading the barnstar you gave Kung Fu Man that you're as excited as me that our project finally has an FA to its name! It's truly a great day for [[WP:POKE|WikiProject Pok\xe9mon]]! - +++$+++ :No problem. I see by reading the barnstar you gave Kung Fu Man that you're as excited as me that our project finally has an FA to its name! It's truly a great day for [[WP:POKE|WikiProject Pokémon]]! -[[User:Sesu Prime|'''<font color="#0000cd">sesu</font>''']][[User talk:Sesu Prime|'''<font color="#b22222">PRIME</font>''']] 03:04, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

278945 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278945 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-11-01 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.099357800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 17:10, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)
278946 +++$+++ AugPi +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278945 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2004-11-01 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.099378620E09 +++$+++ This way the &cap; appears centered between the ''A'' and the ''B'' (at least on my browser).  Which brings me to my question: the character for &empty; shows up as an empty square on my browser, not as an empty set character &Oslash;.  Does &empty; appear correctly on your browser and what did you do (if anything) to make it appear correctly? -- +++$+++ :: This way the &cap; appears centered between the ''A'' and the ''B'' (at least on my browser).  Which brings me to my question: the character for &empty; shows up as an empty square on my browser, not as an empty set character &Oslash;.  Does &empty; appear correctly on your browser and what did you do (if anything) to make it appear correctly? --[[User:AugPi|AugPi]] 22:57, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
278947 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278945 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2004-11-01 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.099380780E09 +++$+++ For all the browsers I use (Safari, IE, Omniweb, Forefox) the former looks centered, the latter does not.  Also the using former which uses \"non-breaking spaces\" means that \"''A''&nbsp;&cap;&nbsp;''B''\" will always appear on the same line, that is it won't break across two lines.  Also both empty set symbols show up correctly for me in all browsers, you might try changing your Wikipedia \"math rendering preference\"  +++$+++ :::For all the browsers I use (Safari, IE, Omniweb, Forefox) the former looks centered, the latter does not.  Also the using former which uses "non-breaking spaces" means that "''A''&nbsp;&cap;&nbsp;''B''" will always appear on the same line, that is it won't break across two lines.  Also both empty set symbols show up correctly for me in all browsers, you might try changing your Wikipedia "math rendering preference" [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] 23:33, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)

541095 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541095 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-13 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.218679140E09 +++$+++ Good progress with Azerbaijan, I like the way you have worked out the rayons. Great!. But do you intend to create redirects from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles\/Places\/azerbaijan\/page1]]?. One thing though I'm not certain whether the Azeri titles and letteing is generally used on here, I;ve found it is usually anglicised in the article titles otherwise Baku for instance would be Bak\u0131. I know that when I started some Azeri films using Azeri lettering a while back some of the editors from Wiki Azerbaijan moved it to english. Unfortuately they are no longer active to ask. +++$+++ Good progress with Azerbaijan, I like the way you have worked out the rayons. Great!. But do you intend to create redirects from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Places/azerbaijan/page1]]?. One thing though I'm not certain whether the Azeri titles and letteing is generally used on here, I;ve found it is usually anglicised in the article titles otherwise Baku for instance would be Bakı. I know that when I started some Azeri films using Azeri lettering a while back some of the editors from Wiki Azerbaijan moved it to english. Unfortuately they are no longer active to ask.[[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:navy;">'''''♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Navy">'''"Talk"?'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 18:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
541096 +++$+++ Brilliantine +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541095 +++$+++ 541095 +++$+++ 2008-08-13 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.218679620E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)]] is the relevant policy, but as long as there are redirects in characters found on a keyboard, I don't mind either way. Very impressive number of articles, by the way - good work.  +++$+++ : [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)]] is the relevant policy, but as long as there are redirects in characters found on a keyboard, I don't mind either way. Very impressive number of articles, by the way - good work. [[User:Brilliantine|Brilliantine]] ([[User talk:Brilliantine|talk]]) 19:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
541097 +++$+++ Brilliantine +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541095 +++$+++ 541096 +++$+++ 2008-08-13 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.218679980E09 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 has pointed out to me on my talk that [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)]] was actually a more relevant policy.  +++$+++ ::Carlossuarez46 has pointed out to me on my talk that [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)]] was actually a more relevant policy. [[User:Brilliantine|Brilliantine]] ([[User talk:Brilliantine|talk]]) 19:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

16808 +++$+++ Krazycev13 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16808 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-14 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.279176900E09 +++$+++ According to [[WP:MUSIC]], criteria 5, if a band \"has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).\" Therefore, PMtoday meets the criteria. I'm putting a hangon tag under your speedy deletion first, and please write back. Thank you. --''' +++$+++ According to [[WP:MUSIC]], criteria 5, if a band "has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)." Therefore, PMtoday meets the criteria. I'm putting a hangon tag under your speedy deletion first, and please write back. Thank you. --'''[[User:Krazycev13|<span style="font-family: Comic Sans MS;color: #D98500">ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV</span>]]''[[User talk:Krazycev13|<span style="font-family: Comic Sans MS;color: #1589FF">13</span>]]''''' 23:55, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
16809 +++$+++ Krazycev13 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16808 +++$+++ 16808 +++$+++ 2010-07-16 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.279323060E09 +++$+++ So now it's a PROD? Haha. Well, please don't take this as sarcasm, but I sourced that PMtoday meets criteria 5 of [[WP:MUSIC]] above. Why are you only addressing that the band is simply signed? Releasing two albums makes them notable due to the fact that both were released on [[Rise Records]]. Please tell me if I am making a mistake somewhere. --''' +++$+++ :So now it's a PROD? Haha. Well, please don't take this as sarcasm, but I sourced that PMtoday meets criteria 5 of [[WP:MUSIC]] above. Why are you only addressing that the band is simply signed? Releasing two albums makes them notable due to the fact that both were released on [[Rise Records]]. Please tell me if I am making a mistake somewhere. --'''[[User:Krazycev13|<span style="font-family: Comic Sans MS;color: #D98500">ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV</span>]]''[[User talk:Krazycev13|<span style="font-family: Comic Sans MS;color: #1589FF">13</span>]]''''' 16:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

570780 +++$+++ Improv +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570780 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-24 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.153774740E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, I'm not a great person to ask about complex signatures -- you might want to hop on IRC for some more advice. Generally images in signatures are frowned upon though. WRT archiving talk pages, what you do is move your current talk page to something like User_talk:Dfrg.msc\/archive1 and then return to your talk page, make a link to that, and note that you archived. If you need help, I can either do it for you or show you how in more detail. -- +++$+++ Unfortunately, I'm not a great person to ask about complex signatures -- you might want to hop on IRC for some more advice. Generally images in signatures are frowned upon though. WRT archiving talk pages, what you do is move your current talk page to something like User_talk:Dfrg.msc/archive1 and then return to your talk page, make a link to that, and note that you archived. If you need help, I can either do it for you or show you how in more detail. --[[User:Improv|Improv]] 13:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
570781 +++$+++ Improv +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570780 +++$+++ 570780 +++$+++ 2006-07-25 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.153880220E09 +++$+++ Is there any way I could convince you not to include an image in your signature though? It's rather obnoxious and makes conversations look ugly. -- +++$+++ *Is there any way I could convince you not to include an image in your signature though? It's rather obnoxious and makes conversations look ugly. --[[User:Improv|Improv]] 19:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

16810 +++$+++ Krazycev13 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16810 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-17 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.279406580E09 +++$+++ This was a wording error on my half. I don't mean that it meets five '''different''' criteria, but that it literally meets '''criteria number 5'''. Therefore, despite sources, which can be improved, I'm thinking it should be kept. --''' +++$+++ This was a wording error on my half. I don't mean that it meets five '''different''' criteria, but that it literally meets '''criteria number 5'''. Therefore, despite sources, which can be improved, I'm thinking it should be kept. --'''[[User:Krazycev13|<span style="font-family: Comic Sans MS;color: #D98500">ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV</span>]]''[[User talk:Krazycev13|<span style="font-family: Comic Sans MS;color: #1589FF">13</span>]]''''' 15:43, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
16811 +++$+++ Krazycev13 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16810 +++$+++ 16810 +++$+++ 2010-07-18 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.279443300E09 +++$+++ Gotcha. Sorry if I came off as rude at all. I wasn't intending it. --''' +++$+++ :Gotcha. Sorry if I came off as rude at all. I wasn't intending it. --'''[[User:Krazycev13|<span style="font-family: Comic Sans MS;color: #D98500">ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV</span>]]''[[User talk:Krazycev13|<span style="font-family: Comic Sans MS;color: #1589FF">13</span>]]''''' 01:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

506844 +++$+++ The Blammer +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506844 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-06 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.181145120E09 +++$+++ Yes I can, the Niddrie Secondary Collage page, the paragraph about Anne Fox didn't seem to be mindless crap. As well as the fact that you messed up a guy page when it was half finished-- +++$+++ Yes I can, the Niddrie Secondary Collage page, the paragraph about Anne Fox didn't seem to be mindless crap. As well as the fact that you messed up a guy page when it was half finished--[[User:The Blammer|The Blammer]] 08:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
506845 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506844 +++$+++ 506844 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.181146200E09 +++$+++ Not mindless crap, but it was one person's uncited opinion, not really important to the article, and needed to be removed. I don't know who the \"guy\" was. -- +++$+++ :Not mindless crap, but it was one person's uncited opinion, not really important to the article, and needed to be removed. I don't know who the "guy" was. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] 09:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

278959 +++$+++ Silsor +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-11-18 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.100846220E09 +++$+++ Sorry for not responding for so long, I have been trying to give [[User:Sam Hocevar]] enough rope to hang himself which not being too bright he proceeded to do.  You can read about it at [[User:Silsor\/Sam Hocevar]].  Popeye and Sam worked together on the RFC and hoped to use you as their dupe in the RFC process, which was a troll attempt.  If you have any questions that aren't answered there I'll be happy to answer them without delay.  +++$+++ Sorry for not responding for so long, I have been trying to give [[User:Sam Hocevar]] enough rope to hang himself which not being too bright he proceeded to do.  You can read about it at [[User:Silsor/Sam Hocevar]].  Popeye and Sam worked together on the RFC and hoped to use you as their dupe in the RFC process, which was a troll attempt.  If you have any questions that aren't answered there I'll be happy to answer them without delay. [[User:Silsor|silsor]] 22:37, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)
278960 +++$+++ Sam Hocevar +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278959 +++$+++ 278959 +++$+++ 2004-11-19 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.100859120E09 +++$+++ I don't remember calling you names, Silsor. If I did, give me a chance to apologise. If I did not, please don't call me \"not too bright\", it serves no purpose, especially on a public place I'm not supposed to actively follow. Despite your behaviour, I honestly think I have always been of the most absolute courtesy to you. Also, before accusing me of deceiving Paul, which I consider an insult to both of us, please read how I asked Paul to certify the RFC. It is still present two sections above. I presented the facts. I carefully left every possible way for Paul to kindly decline my request, without forcing him to anything. I think it was the most polite way to do it. See how optimistic I was to see you answer. See how I assumed that '''Paul's certifying was no longer needed since you had decided to answer beforehand'''. And stop accusing me of working with Popeye on the RFC, I thought and wrote every single line of it. The only communication relevant to this issue that I had with Popeye before that was asking him whether his account was still blocked. I honestly don't think he even knew what the RFC process was before I gave him the link to the one I wrote, and it was not a troll, until you decided to troll yourself into evading the questions again and again.  +++$+++ :I don't remember calling you names, Silsor. If I did, give me a chance to apologise. If I did not, please don't call me "not too bright", it serves no purpose, especially on a public place I'm not supposed to actively follow. Despite your behaviour, I honestly think I have always been of the most absolute courtesy to you. Also, before accusing me of deceiving Paul, which I consider an insult to both of us, please read how I asked Paul to certify the RFC. It is still present two sections above. I presented the facts. I carefully left every possible way for Paul to kindly decline my request, without forcing him to anything. I think it was the most polite way to do it. See how optimistic I was to see you answer. See how I assumed that '''Paul's certifying was no longer needed since you had decided to answer beforehand'''. And stop accusing me of working with Popeye on the RFC, I thought and wrote every single line of it. The only communication relevant to this issue that I had with Popeye before that was asking him whether his account was still blocked. I honestly don't think he even knew what the RFC process was before I gave him the link to the one I wrote, and it was not a troll, until you decided to troll yourself into evading the questions again and again. [[User:Sam Hocevar|Sam Hocevar]] 02:12, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

16816 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16816 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-12 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.281660360E09 +++$+++ I agree with Knusser. [[List of countries that do not have rivers]] is certainly useful and will help avoid problems with editors trying to find articles to write about from these places. +++$+++ I agree with Knusser. [[List of countries that do not have rivers]] is certainly useful and will help avoid problems with editors trying to find articles to write about from these places.[[User:Dr. Blofeld|'''<em style="font-family:Calisto MT;color:black"> Dr.</em>''']] [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|'''<em style="font-family:Calisto MT;color:black">Blofeld</em>''']] 17:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
16817 +++$+++ JCbot +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16816 +++$+++ 16816 +++$+++ 2010-08-21 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.282382040E09 +++$+++ \u2014<\/small>  +++$+++ : —</small> [[User:JCbot|JCbot]] ([[User talk:JCbot|talk]]) 02:14, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

278962 +++$+++ Slrubenstein +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-12-08 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.102575780E09 +++$+++ Would you look at the recent history of \"Postmodernity\" and the discussion and comment?[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/wiki.phtml?title=Postmodernity&action=history] Thanks,  +++$+++ Would you look at the recent history of "Postmodernity" and the discussion and comment?[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Postmodernity&action=history] Thanks, [[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]] 23:03, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
278963 +++$+++ JesseW +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278962 +++$+++ 278962 +++$+++ 2004-12-10 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.102736760E09 +++$+++ Looks great.  Took me a sec to figure it out, as I put the listings at the bottom so they would be easier to find, but actually, your way makes the ToC clearer and is generally better.  Good job.  +++$+++ :Looks great.  Took me a sec to figure it out, as I put the listings at the bottom so they would be easier to find, but actually, your way makes the ToC clearer and is generally better.  Good job. [[User:JesseW|JesseW]] 19:46, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

16819 +++$+++ Dripping_Flame +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-30 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.283231340E09 +++$+++ Hello Realkyhick, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of [[:Yi-Jen Lai]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article.''' You may wish to review the [[WP:CSD{{!}}Criteria for Speedy Deletion]] before tagging further pages. Thank you.   +++$+++ Hello Realkyhick, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of [[:Yi-Jen Lai]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article.''' You may wish to review the [[WP:CSD{{!}}Criteria for Speedy Deletion]] before tagging further pages. Thank you.  [[User:Dripping_Flame|<span style="border:3px solid grey;background:black;padding:1px;color:gold;text-shadow:white 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em"><font face="Papyrus"><big>&nbsp;'''ʄ'''</big><font color="white">lame</font>&nbsp;</font></span>]] 22:09, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
16820 +++$+++ Dripping_Flame +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16819 +++$+++ 16819 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.283251860E09 +++$+++ The current consensus holds that it is bad practice to tag articles for speedy deletion as lacking context (CSD A1) or content (CSD A3) moments after creation, as users may be actively working on the article content. Ten to fifteen minutes is considered a good time to wait before tagging such articles under either of these criteria. Please note that before an appropriate waiting period is over, the articles should not be marked as patrolled, so that the wait does not result in the article escaping review at a later time.  +++$+++ :The current consensus holds that it is bad practice to tag articles for speedy deletion as lacking context (CSD A1) or content (CSD A3) moments after creation, as users may be actively working on the article content. Ten to fifteen minutes is considered a good time to wait before tagging such articles under either of these criteria. Please note that before an appropriate waiting period is over, the articles should not be marked as patrolled, so that the wait does not result in the article escaping review at a later time. [[User:Dripping_Flame|<span style="border:3px solid grey;background:black;padding:1px;color:gold;text-shadow:white 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em"><font face="Papyrus"><big>&nbsp;'''ʄ'''</big><font color="white">lame</font>&nbsp;</font></span>]] 03:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

278965 +++$+++ Tobacman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-12-16 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.103268900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for removing that tag from the Harvard science center article and marking it as a stub. The polaroid-style architecture and collections of old scientific instruments housed there might make the building worthy of an independent article, but the link was just a test I meant to only preview and forgot.  +++$+++ Thanks for removing that tag from the Harvard science center article and marking it as a stub. The polaroid-style architecture and collections of old scientific instruments housed there might make the building worthy of an independent article, but the link was just a test I meant to only preview and forgot. [[User:Tobacman|Tobacman]] 23:35, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
278966 +++$+++  +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278965 +++$+++ 278965 +++$+++ 2004-12-24 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.103923860E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm trying to figure out what's going on with regards to [[Cayley-Newbirth operation matrix]]. On VFD, you wrote: \"Delete This is a hoax. \u2014ExplorerCDT 13:31, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)\". Why do you think this article is a hoax? Previously you wrote: \"If it is a hoax, it's at least 40 years old. It appears (albeit as the Cayley Operational Matrix, without Newbirth credited) via several mentions and footnotes in my 1964 edition of Handbook of Mathematical Functions from the U.S. National Bureau of Standards. That alone leads me to think it isn't a hoax. \u2014ExplorerCDT 07:56, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)\" Why did you change your mind? And can you tell me where in Handbook of Mathematical Functions \"Cayley Operational Matrix\" is mentioned. Thanks. Paul August ? 23:06, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC) +++$+++ :Hi, I'm trying to figure out what's going on with regards to [[Cayley-Newbirth operation matrix]]. On VFD, you wrote: "Delete This is a hoax. —ExplorerCDT 13:31, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)". Why do you think this article is a hoax? Previously you wrote: "If it is a hoax, it's at least 40 years old. It appears (albeit as the Cayley Operational Matrix, without Newbirth credited) via several mentions and footnotes in my 1964 edition of Handbook of Mathematical Functions from the U.S. National Bureau of Standards. That alone leads me to think it isn't a hoax. —ExplorerCDT 07:56, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)" Why did you change your mind? And can you tell me where in Handbook of Mathematical Functions "Cayley Operational Matrix" is mentioned. Thanks. Paul August ? 23:06, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)

278967 +++$+++ ExplorerCDT +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278967 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-12-24 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.103958660E09 +++$+++ What's going on?  I misread Handbook of Mathematical Functions, thinking it wasn't a hoax.  Now, after being told by several people it is, I retract my vote saying it's a hoax.  For some stupid power-mad reason, I have [[User:Charles Matthews]] accusing me of planting it, or having conspiratorial knowledge without any proof, and harassing me to no end.  I wish you people, pardon the expression, would just go fuck off. &mdash; +++$+++ What's going on?  I misread Handbook of Mathematical Functions, thinking it wasn't a hoax.  Now, after being told by several people it is, I retract my vote saying it's a hoax.  For some stupid power-mad reason, I have [[User:Charles Matthews]] accusing me of planting it, or having conspiratorial knowledge without any proof, and harassing me to no end.  I wish you people, pardon the expression, would just go fuck off. &mdash;[[User:ExplorerCDT|ExplorerCDT]] 23:11, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
278968 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278967 +++$+++ 278967 +++$+++ 2004-12-24 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.103960220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply.  I'm sorry if I'm bothering you, but I think it is important to get to the bottom of this.  I have spent countless hours editing, trying to make Wikipedia a better encylopedia,  I presume, so have you.  \"Hoax\" articles are very bad for Wikipedia.  So, are you saying that there are ''no'' mentions of \"Cayley Operational Matrix\" in ''Handbook of Mathematical Functions'' that you are aware of? Can you tell me what passages from ''Handbook of Mathematical Functions'' you misread, which made you think there were?  +++$+++ :Thanks for your reply.  I'm sorry if I'm bothering you, but I think it is important to get to the bottom of this.  I have spent countless hours editing, trying to make Wikipedia a better encylopedia,  I presume, so have you.  "Hoax" articles are very bad for Wikipedia.  So, are you saying that there are ''no'' mentions of "Cayley Operational Matrix" in ''Handbook of Mathematical Functions'' that you are aware of? Can you tell me what passages from ''Handbook of Mathematical Functions'' you misread, which made you think there were? [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:37, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)

278971 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-12-31 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.104553020E09 +++$+++ Sorry to be a bother, but I'm trying to understand the vfd process better.  Can I assume that no concenus was reached to delete [[Blunsdon United]]? How can I tell who determined the result? Can I remove the vfd tag from that article (I'm not a sysop)? Is [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion\/Blunsdon United]] supposed to be updated to reflect a result? Can anyone do that? should I?  +++$+++ Sorry to be a bother, but I'm trying to understand the vfd process better.  Can I assume that no concenus was reached to delete [[Blunsdon United]]? How can I tell who determined the result? Can I remove the vfd tag from that article (I'm not a sysop)? Is [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Blunsdon United]] supposed to be updated to reflect a result? Can anyone do that? should I? [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:17, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)
278972 +++$+++ Fennec +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278971 +++$+++ 278971 +++$+++ 2004-12-31 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.104553620E09 +++$+++ Dreadfully sorry about this- I believe I was in the middle of dealing with multiple articles at once when either Wikipedia or my Internet connection failed. Yes, it survived VFD. I have removed the tag and placed the appropriate note on the talk page. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. - +++$+++ :Dreadfully sorry about this- I believe I was in the middle of dealing with multiple articles at once when either Wikipedia or my Internet connection failed. Yes, it survived VFD. I have removed the tag and placed the appropriate note on the talk page. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. -[[User:Fennec|Fennec]] [[User_Talk:Fennec|(&#12399;&#12373;&#12400;&#12367;&#12398;&#12365;&#12388;&#12397;)]] 20:27, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

541118 +++$+++ Phlegm Rooster +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-17 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.218977760E09 +++$+++ I am concerned that the town of A\u011far\u0259himoba\/Agaragimoba\/Agaraimoba does not exist. The coordinates provided are very general ({{coor dm|41|30|N|48|41|E}}) and point to an empty field. There are some houses scattered about, yes, but {{find|A\u011far\u0259himoba}} OR {{find|Agaragimoba}} OR {{find|Agaraimoba}} doesn't show anything that could be construed as providing any evidence that the town exists, just commercial websites using GEOnet Names Server data. [http:\/\/az.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/X%C3%BCsusi:Search?search=A%C4%9Far%C9%99himoba A search] in the Azeri Wikipedia finds nothing. Would it be possible for you to blank the stub (as author) since it appears to fail [[WP:V]]?  +++$+++ I am concerned that the town of Ağarəhimoba/Agaragimoba/Agaraimoba does not exist. The coordinates provided are very general ({{coor dm|41|30|N|48|41|E}}) and point to an empty field. There are some houses scattered about, yes, but {{find|Ağarəhimoba}} OR {{find|Agaragimoba}} OR {{find|Agaraimoba}} doesn't show anything that could be construed as providing any evidence that the town exists, just commercial websites using GEOnet Names Server data. [http://az.wikipedia.org/wiki/X%C3%BCsusi:Search?search=A%C4%9Far%C9%99himoba A search] in the Azeri Wikipedia finds nothing. Would it be possible for you to blank the stub (as author) since it appears to fail [[WP:V]]? [[User:Phlegm Rooster|Phlegm Rooster]] ([[User talk:Phlegm Rooster|talk]]) 05:56, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
541119 +++$+++ Phlegm Rooster +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541118 +++$+++ 541118 +++$+++ 2008-08-17 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.218985380E09 +++$+++ So you can see that most of the places exist, and have some sort of evidence other than a GNS entry. When I can't find anything, I grow concerned.  +++$+++ *So you can see that most of the places exist, and have some sort of evidence other than a GNS entry. When I can't find anything, I grow concerned. [[User:Phlegm Rooster|Phlegm Rooster]] ([[User talk:Phlegm Rooster|talk]]) 08:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

16831 +++$+++ Grumpy one au +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16831 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-14 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.284453480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Grumpy one au|Grumpy one au]] ([[User talk:Grumpy one au|talk]]) 01:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
16832 +++$+++ Protector of Wiki +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16831 +++$+++ 16831 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.284466260E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia is [[Wikipedia:WEBHOST|not your webhost]]. Please go elsewhere to do your project.  +++$+++ :Wikipedia is [[Wikipedia:WEBHOST|not your webhost]]. Please go elsewhere to do your project. [[User:Protector of Wiki|Protector of Wiki]] ([[User talk:Protector of Wiki|talk]]) 05:11, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

278978 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278978 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-01-21 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.106362860E09 +++$+++ Hi Sean. In the [[Mathematics]] article, I noticed that you changed: \"Some say that mathematics is not a [[science]] at all, rather an [[art]]\" to simply: \"Some say that mathematics is not a [[science]] at all\"  with the edit summary of \"woa woa... math is definitely in no way an art\".  While ''you'' may not consider it so, I can assure you that very many mathematicians (myself and the many mathematicians that I know, included) ''do'' consider it to be an art. See for example: [[Mathematical beauty]]. Or do a Google search on \"mathematics as art\". Regards,  +++$+++ Hi Sean. In the [[Mathematics]] article, I noticed that you changed: "Some say that mathematics is not a [[science]] at all, rather an [[art]]" to simply: "Some say that mathematics is not a [[science]] at all"  with the edit summary of "woa woa... math is definitely in no way an art".  While ''you'' may not consider it so, I can assure you that very many mathematicians (myself and the many mathematicians that I know, included) ''do'' consider it to be an art. See for example: [[Mathematical beauty]]. Or do a Google search on "mathematics as art". Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:01, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
278979 +++$+++ Sean Kelly +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278978 +++$+++ 278978 +++$+++ 2005-01-21 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.106372520E09 +++$+++ Secondly, the passage as it was originally given is misleading.  IMHO, to the average person, \"Some say that mathematics is not a [[science]] at all, rather an [[art]]\" would not convey the idea you and I (and the many mathematicians that you know) share, which is that mathematics is beautiful. -- +++$+++ :Secondly, the passage as it was originally given is misleading.  IMHO, to the average person, "Some say that mathematics is not a [[science]] at all, rather an [[art]]" would not convey the idea you and I (and the many mathematicians that you know) share, which is that mathematics is beautiful. --[[User:Sean Kelly|Sean Kelly]] 21:42, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

278980 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-01-21 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.106377500E09 +++$+++ No I'm afraid I don't share the distinction you make above.  Mathematics is no less \"physical\"  than poetry and, in the opinion of many mathematicians, no less artful. I'm not so interested in arguing whether mathematics ''is'' or ''is not'' an art, rather I'm trying to make you understand that, whether they are right or not, many mathematicians regard it as such.  +++$+++ No I'm afraid I don't share the distinction you make above.  Mathematics is no less "physical"  than poetry and, in the opinion of many mathematicians, no less artful. I'm not so interested in arguing whether mathematics ''is'' or ''is not'' an art, rather I'm trying to make you understand that, whether they are right or not, many mathematicians regard it as such. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:05, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
278981 +++$+++ Sean Kelly +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278980 +++$+++ 278980 +++$+++ 2005-01-22 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.106430000E09 +++$+++ Well either way, I will stop babbling and accept your point that most mathematicians consider mathematics an art.  It just give me goosebumps is all.  -- +++$+++ :Well either way, I will stop babbling and accept your point that most mathematicians consider mathematics an art.  It just give me goosebumps is all.  --[[User:Sean Kelly|Sean Kelly]] 13:40, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

278982 +++$+++ Muriel Gottrop +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-01-24 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.106609940E09 +++$+++ Dear Paul, thanks for your support. And let me tell you one thing i love about wikipedia: cooperation. The edits you made were great, i'm glad you made them. Cheers,  +++$+++ Dear Paul, thanks for your support. And let me tell you one thing i love about wikipedia: cooperation. The edits you made were great, i'm glad you made them. Cheers, [[User:Muriel Gottrop|muriel@pt]] 15:39, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
278983 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278982 +++$+++ 278982 +++$+++ 2005-01-24 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.106617260E09 +++$+++ Thanks. It's an excellent article, You've done a great job with it. I'm glad you like the edits I've made. Cooperation is so much better than the alternative ;-) Regards.  +++$+++ :Thanks. It's an excellent article, You've done a great job with it. I'm glad you like the edits I've made. Cooperation is so much better than the alternative ;-) Regards. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:41, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
278984 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278982 +++$+++ 278982 +++$+++ 2005-01-25 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.106718960E09 +++$+++ Hi Muriel, I've made a few more edits.  I hope you like them. If you have a problem with any of them, let me know ;-)  +++$+++ :Hi Muriel, I've made a few more edits.  I hope you like them. If you have a problem with any of them, let me know ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:56, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

541127 +++$+++ De728631 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-21 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.219382940E09 +++$+++ Hello Carlos, just a thing I noticed while putting up Azeri redirects: the \u0131 character does not need a redirect because the search engine automatically takes it as an i.  +++$+++ Hello Carlos, just a thing I noticed while putting up Azeri redirects: the ı character does not need a redirect because the search engine automatically takes it as an i. [[User:De728631|De728631]] ([[User talk:De728631|talk]]) 22:29, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
541128 +++$+++ De728631 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541127 +++$+++ 541127 +++$+++ 2008-08-21 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.219383420E09 +++$+++ Ah, the depths of wikicode. :)  +++$+++ :Ah, the depths of wikicode. :) [[User:De728631|De728631]] ([[User talk:De728631|talk]]) 22:37, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

541129 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541129 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-26 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.219759740E09 +++$+++ Hey Carlos. Typically on Azerbaijan-related articles we don't use the complete Azeri script. This is why [[Ilham Aliyev]] is not at [[\u0130lham \u018fliyev]]. Also, your redirects on these two pages destroyed the edit history of the articles. I think there should be some consensus on the titles of these articles, but for now I think we should stick to what most users seem to consider the \"English\" names. <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ Hey Carlos. Typically on Azerbaijan-related articles we don't use the complete Azeri script. This is why [[Ilham Aliyev]] is not at [[İlham Əliyev]]. Also, your redirects on these two pages destroyed the edit history of the articles. I think there should be some consensus on the titles of these articles, but for now I think we should stick to what most users seem to consider the "English" names. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 07:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
541130 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541129 +++$+++ 541129 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.219925100E09 +++$+++ Good point, my main concern was that you destroyed the edit history of those pages which is required under the GFDL. I know at least the consensus on articles about Azerbaijani people is to use the \"English\" or Anglicized names per [[Talk:Ilham Aliyev]]. But you have a point about geographic names, although I think this should be discussed further possibly at one of the project names sometime. <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :Good point, my main concern was that you destroyed the edit history of those pages which is required under the GFDL. I know at least the consensus on articles about Azerbaijani people is to use the "English" or Anglicized names per [[Talk:Ilham Aliyev]]. But you have a point about geographic names, although I think this should be discussed further possibly at one of the project names sometime. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 05:05, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
541131 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541129 +++$+++ 541130 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.219974900E09 +++$+++ Because you moved the page by copying and pasting the contents. The real edit history is now [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Barkhudarli&action=history hidden] in the redirect, while most readers will only see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Barxudarl%C4%B1&action=history this], which is less than half of the edit history. <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ ::Because you moved the page by copying and pasting the contents. The real edit history is now [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barkhudarli&action=history hidden] in the redirect, while most readers will only see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barxudarl%C4%B1&action=history this], which is less than half of the edit history. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 18:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
541132 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541129 +++$+++ 541131 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.219975680E09 +++$+++ Per [[Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves]], \"This is a Very [[Bad Thing]], because we need to keep the history with the content for [[Wikipedia:Copyright|copyright]] reasons.\" I've fixed the two pages by by merging the edit histories. Are there any others? <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :::Per [[Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves]], "This is a Very [[Bad Thing]], because we need to keep the history with the content for [[Wikipedia:Copyright|copyright]] reasons." I've fixed the two pages by by merging the edit histories. Are there any others? <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 19:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
541133 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541129 +++$+++ 541132 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.219975800E09 +++$+++ I'll keep this in mind in the future. ;-) <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ ::::I'll keep this in mind in the future. ;-) <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 19:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

278987 +++$+++ CryptoDerk +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-02-02 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.107354120E09 +++$+++ I've had some edit conflicts with you recently... I listed that I'd be working in 00 General.  Also, you wrote that the WP articles are more complete on than PM's article [http:\/\/planetmath.org\/?op=getobj&from=objects&id=6415 here].  I don't see that our proof articles discuss what PM calls an \"existential proof\".  Can you direct me to where you found this and create a relevant redirect?   +++$+++ I've had some edit conflicts with you recently... I listed that I'd be working in 00 General.  Also, you wrote that the WP articles are more complete on than PM's article [http://planetmath.org/?op=getobj&from=objects&id=6415 here].  I don't see that our proof articles discuss what PM calls an "existential proof".  Can you direct me to where you found this and create a relevant redirect?  [[User:CryptoDerk|CryptoDerk]] 06:22, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)
278988 +++$+++ CryptoDerk +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278987 +++$+++ 278987 +++$+++ 2005-02-02 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.107354840E09 +++$+++ No big deal about the edit conflicts thing.  Just want to make sure we don't copy over the same article at the same time :o  Also, thanks for clearing up the existential proof thing.   +++$+++ :No big deal about the edit conflicts thing.  Just want to make sure we don't copy over the same article at the same time :o  Also, thanks for clearing up the existential proof thing.  [[User:CryptoDerk|CryptoDerk]] 06:34, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)

278989 +++$+++ Zero0000 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278989 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-02-03 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.107456780E09 +++$+++ Why do you say that the Erdos title is ok now?  It looks exactly the same to me. -- +++$+++ Why do you say that the Erdos title is ok now?  It looks exactly the same to me. --[[User:Zero0000|Zero]] 10:53, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
278990 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278989 +++$+++ 278989 +++$+++ 2005-02-03 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.107473340E09 +++$+++ Hi Zero0000, what is wrong with the title for [[Erd\xf6s number]]? It looks ok to me. Doesn't the \"umlaut\" over the \"o\" display for you?  +++$+++ :Hi Zero0000, what is wrong with the title for [[Erdös number]]? It looks ok to me. Doesn't the "umlaut" over the "o" display for you? [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:29, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)

16846 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-22 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.285207260E09 +++$+++ I feel the notability tag was sufficient. It's a rather benign notice, as opposed to a speedy-delete or PROD, especially when a case is not clear-cut as in this case. Since the article is new, it's just a notice to the author that they need to establish notability a little better. I've been doing new-page patrol for years now, so I think I know what action is appropriate for a particular case. -  +++$+++ I feel the notability tag was sufficient. It's a rather benign notice, as opposed to a speedy-delete or PROD, especially when a case is not clear-cut as in this case. Since the article is new, it's just a notice to the author that they need to establish notability a little better. I've been doing new-page patrol for years now, so I think I know what action is appropriate for a particular case. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 19:01, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
16847 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16846 +++$+++ 16846 +++$+++ 2010-09-22 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.285218300E09 +++$+++ I disagree. Apparently I was unclear. I did not post on your page because I was suggesting you do ''more''. I am suggesting you do ''less''. I found the tag not \"sufficient\" but completely unwarranted and spammy, unneeded, uncalled for, wrong, drive-by tagging. I am requesting you be less quick to paste drive by tags on articles, certainly when you have expended exactly zero effort to resolve the issue which you believe you see in the article. I trust my view is now clear to you. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]<\/sup> +++$+++ : I disagree. Apparently I was unclear. I did not post on your page because I was suggesting you do ''more''. I am suggesting you do ''less''. I found the tag not "sufficient" but completely unwarranted and spammy, unneeded, uncalled for, wrong, drive-by tagging. I am requesting you be less quick to paste drive by tags on articles, certainly when you have expended exactly zero effort to resolve the issue which you believe you see in the article. I trust my view is now clear to you. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup>[[User:Heimstern/Ignoring incivility|Advice]]</small> 22:05, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
16848 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16846 +++$+++ 16847 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.285225320E09 +++$+++ And I wholeheartedly, unequivocally disagree with you in the strongest means possible. There is no mandate that anyone who places a tag on an article to do anything else. There is absolutely nothing wrong with tagging an article without adding anything else. Moreover, given your comment below, it appears you are watching my actions -- in other words, stalking me. Well, all I can say is watch your step. I've been an active editor here for several years, and I am well aware of the rules and regs. -  +++$+++ ::And I wholeheartedly, unequivocally disagree with you in the strongest means possible. There is no mandate that anyone who places a tag on an article to do anything else. There is absolutely nothing wrong with tagging an article without adding anything else. Moreover, given your comment below, it appears you are watching my actions -- in other words, stalking me. Well, all I can say is watch your step. I've been an active editor here for several years, and I am well aware of the rules and regs. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 00:02, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

278991 +++$+++ Zero0000 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-02-04 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.107544200E09 +++$+++ An umlaut is incorrect, that's the point.  It is supposed to be a Hungarian mark like an umlaut with long strokes instead of dots.  It doesn't work in titles because it is not in the Latin-1 character set.  I'll put back the comment.  -- +++$+++ An umlaut is incorrect, that's the point.  It is supposed to be a Hungarian mark like an umlaut with long strokes instead of dots.  It doesn't work in titles because it is not in the Latin-1 character set.  I'll put back the comment.  --[[User:Zero0000|Zero]] 11:10, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
278992 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278991 +++$+++ 278991 +++$+++ 2005-02-04 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.107556440E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see. Sorry.  +++$+++ :Ah, I see. Sorry. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:34, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

527096 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527096 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-03 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.220452080E09 +++$+++ I think that the portal is great and that it was wonderful to see [[Angel Mendez]] featured. Your contributions and fixes are always welcomed, thank you for what you did in the [[Puerto Rican Campaign]], nice article isn't it?  I was aborbed the last couple of days researching the case: Gonzalez v Williams, which delt with a young Puerto Rican women whose contributions are unknown because she has fallen into the cracks of history. I think that I did her justice with this article [[Isabel Gonzalez]].  +++$+++ I think that the portal is great and that it was wonderful to see [[Angel Mendez]] featured. Your contributions and fixes are always welcomed, thank you for what you did in the [[Puerto Rican Campaign]], nice article isn't it?  I was aborbed the last couple of days researching the case: Gonzalez v Williams, which delt with a young Puerto Rican women whose contributions are unknown because she has fallen into the cracks of history. I think that I did her justice with this article [[Isabel Gonzalez]]. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 07:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
527097 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527096 +++$+++ 527096 +++$+++ 2008-09-04 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.220520660E09 +++$+++ So, tell me honestly, what do you think of the PR Campaign article?  +++$+++ *So, tell me honestly, what do you think of the PR Campaign article? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 02:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

16850 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16850 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-22 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.285218540E09 +++$+++ It is their talk page; they can remove whatever they want, including your posts, vandalism warnings, and anything else they see fit. Edit warring and restoring posts on someone else's talk page can be a blockable offense; please read [[WP:OWNTALK]]. Do not do [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Michizane&diff=prev&oldid=386391513 this] again. You may find the essay at [[WP:DRC]] helpful in understanding this. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]<\/sup> +++$+++ It is their talk page; they can remove whatever they want, including your posts, vandalism warnings, and anything else they see fit. Edit warring and restoring posts on someone else's talk page can be a blockable offense; please read [[WP:OWNTALK]]. Do not do [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Michizane&diff=prev&oldid=386391513 this] again. You may find the essay at [[WP:DRC]] helpful in understanding this. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup>[[User:Heimstern/Ignoring incivility|Advice]]</small> 22:09, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
16851 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16850 +++$+++ 16850 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.285225500E09 +++$+++ I am well aware of the procedures. I did this once -- and ''only'' once -- just to let an uncommunicative new editor know that simply erasing a warning comment would not make the problem go away. If he had erased the comment again, I would have let it go. Instead, he got the message, understood the issues and is addressing it (in a very polite way, I might add). There is nothing even close to an edit war going on here. -  +++$+++ :I am well aware of the procedures. I did this once -- and ''only'' once -- just to let an uncommunicative new editor know that simply erasing a warning comment would not make the problem go away. If he had erased the comment again, I would have let it go. Instead, he got the message, understood the issues and is addressing it (in a very polite way, I might add). There is nothing even close to an edit war going on here. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 00:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
16852 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16850 +++$+++ 16851 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.285226280E09 +++$+++ You reverted his removal of your post, using Twinkle. You have been warned not to do this again. Do not. Once is exactly one time more than is allowed by policy. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]<\/sup> +++$+++ ::You reverted his removal of your post, using Twinkle. You have been warned not to do this again. Do not. Once is exactly one time more than is allowed by policy. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup>[[User:Heimstern/Ignoring incivility|Advice]]</small> 00:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
16853 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16850 +++$+++ 16852 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.285237560E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Mr. WikiCop. Now it would be nice if you weren't being so persnickety about meaningless things like this, and instead help out on new-page patrol to clear out the endless stream of pure vandalism and attack pages, articles about bands that were formed last week, and spam of all flavors. If you don't want to help, then get out of the way while the rest of us get down to work. (It would also help if you addressed the issue of borderline spam in the article that started this whole affair.) -  +++$+++ :::Thank you. Mr. WikiCop. Now it would be nice if you weren't being so persnickety about meaningless things like this, and instead help out on new-page patrol to clear out the endless stream of pure vandalism and attack pages, articles about bands that were formed last week, and spam of all flavors. If you don't want to help, then get out of the way while the rest of us get down to work. (It would also help if you addressed the issue of borderline spam in the article that started this whole affair.) - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 03:26, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

278996 +++$+++ Phil Boswell +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278996 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-02-08 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.107883080E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Phil Boswell|Phil]] | [[User talk:Phil Boswell|Talk]] 09:18, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
278997 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278996 +++$+++ 278996 +++$+++ 2005-02-09 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.108005900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply. Will this work for everyone using IE on windows? Or are there still font issues? I would dearly like to get rid of the ugly \"{}\" notation used in some places on WP, see: [[empty set]] and [[talk:empty set#The empty set symbol]].  +++$+++ :Thanks for the reply. Will this work for everyone using IE on windows? Or are there still font issues? I would dearly like to get rid of the ugly "{}" notation used in some places on WP, see: [[empty set]] and [[talk:empty set#The empty set symbol]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:25, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

278998 +++$+++ Jfruh +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278998 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-02-10 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.108100760E09 +++$+++ Hi there Paul -- I posted a long-ish response to your query over at [[Talk:Theodosius_I#Arians_vs._Homoians]]. -- +++$+++ Hi there Paul -- I posted a long-ish response to your query over at [[Talk:Theodosius_I#Arians_vs._Homoians]]. --[[User:Jfruh|Jfruh]] 21:46, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
278999 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 278998 +++$+++ 278998 +++$+++ 2005-02-15 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.108538100E09 +++$+++ Hi Jfruh: Thanks for responding to  my questions on [[Talk:Theodosius_I#Arians_vs._Homoians]]. I've finnally replied there &mdash; with more questions I'm afraid ;-)  +++$+++ :Hi Jfruh: Thanks for responding to  my questions on [[Talk:Theodosius_I#Arians_vs._Homoians]]. I've finnally replied there &mdash; with more questions I'm afraid ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:15, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)

16855 +++$+++ MDSanker +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-24 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.285341480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:MDSanker|MDSanker]] <small>([[User talk:MDSanker|Talk to me]])</small> 08:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
16856 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16855 +++$+++ 16855 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.285244640E09 +++$+++ Uh, if you are working directly with her, you have a major [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. Wikipedia policy very strongly discourages anyone from writing an article about themselves, or having someone write one about them. The subject of an article, or someone in his or her employ, is not likely to be an objective judge of whether or not someone meets out notability standards. Furthermore, he or she is not likely to present a fair, balanced, neutral point of view about the person, including any information which may portray the subject in a negative light. '''I strongly suggest you stop working on this article right away,''' and let someone who has no connection with Hamilton write an article instead. Otherwise, the article may be seen as self-promotion, and subject to deletion. -  +++$+++ :Uh, if you are working directly with her, you have a major [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. Wikipedia policy very strongly discourages anyone from writing an article about themselves, or having someone write one about them. The subject of an article, or someone in his or her employ, is not likely to be an objective judge of whether or not someone meets out notability standards. Furthermore, he or she is not likely to present a fair, balanced, neutral point of view about the person, including any information which may portray the subject in a negative light. '''I strongly suggest you stop working on this article right away,''' and let someone who has no connection with Hamilton write an article instead. Otherwise, the article may be seen as self-promotion, and subject to deletion. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 05:24, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
16857 +++$+++ MDSanker +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16855 +++$+++ 16856 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 06:15:00 +++$+++ 1.285247700E09 +++$+++ I do not work for her she is in CA I live in TN, Someone found out that I did a page for someone elce and asked if I can start this up for her all she did was send me the photo and let me interview her I will not ever get paid to do this. It is to much fun getting paid would not make it fun. I wish I was connected with her all the fameus people she has worked with. She found me on Facebook. When I said I was working with her it did sound like I was getting paid for it.  +++$+++ ::I do not work for her she is in CA I live in TN, Someone found out that I did a page for someone elce and asked if I can start this up for her all she did was send me the photo and let me interview her I will not ever get paid to do this. It is to much fun getting paid would not make it fun. I wish I was connected with her all the fameus people she has worked with. She found me on Facebook. When I said I was working with her it did sound like I was getting paid for it. [[User:MDSanker|MDSanker]] <small>([[User talk:MDSanker|Talk to me]])</small> Mickey Sanker 06:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
16858 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16855 +++$+++ 16857 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.285284060E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your enthusiasm. While this probably does not figure as a conflict of interest, it does run afoul of another Wikipedia policy: [[WP:OR|no original research]]. If information for your article came from a personal conversation or interview with the subject, that qualifies as original research - information that was created specifically for the Wikipedia article. The reason for this is that original research cannot be independently verified, plus Wikipedia articled are required to use information taken from independent, reliable sources that can be verified. Usually this policy applies to someone who has posted his own theory or thesis on some subject, but the principle applies to biographical articles as well. Please read [[WP:RS|this page]] about reliable, independent sources. -  +++$+++ :::I appreciate your enthusiasm. While this probably does not figure as a conflict of interest, it does run afoul of another Wikipedia policy: [[WP:OR|no original research]]. If information for your article came from a personal conversation or interview with the subject, that qualifies as original research - information that was created specifically for the Wikipedia article. The reason for this is that original research cannot be independently verified, plus Wikipedia articled are required to use information taken from independent, reliable sources that can be verified. Usually this policy applies to someone who has posted his own theory or thesis on some subject, but the principle applies to biographical articles as well. Please read [[WP:RS|this page]] about reliable, independent sources. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 16:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

279001 +++$+++ Jfruh +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-01 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.109687400E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul -- Finally got around to updating [[Theodosius I]], and [[Arianism]] to boot.  I decided to leave out the \"homoian\" name, since it's strictly speaking an invention of modern historians.  Let me know what you thnk.  -- +++$+++ Hi Paul -- Finally got around to updating [[Theodosius I]], and [[Arianism]] to boot.  I decided to leave out the "homoian" name, since it's strictly speaking an invention of modern historians.  Let me know what you thnk.  --[[User:Jfruh|Jfruh]] 06:30, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
279002 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279001 +++$+++ 279001 +++$+++ 2005-03-01 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.109688180E09 +++$+++ Hi Jfruh, I had just finished reading your update to [[Theodosius_I]], when I got your message ;-) On first pass you seem to have delt with the issues rather well I think. But I want to think about them some more, and also read the [[Arianism]] article, before I comment any more.  +++$+++ :Hi Jfruh, I had just finished reading your update to [[Theodosius_I]], when I got your message ;-) On first pass you seem to have delt with the issues rather well I think. But I want to think about them some more, and also read the [[Arianism]] article, before I comment any more. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 06:43, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

279003 +++$+++ Ral315 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279003 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-02-11 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.108119240E09 +++$+++ Please direct all comments to [[User:Ral315|my user-talk page,]] [[Wikipedia talk:Wikiportal\/Mathematics|the Math Wikiportal talk page]], or [[Wikipedia talk:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week|the Math Collaboration of the Week talk page.]]  Thanks a lot for your support!   +++$+++ Please direct all comments to [[User:Ral315|my user-talk page,]] [[Wikipedia talk:Wikiportal/Mathematics|the Math Wikiportal talk page]], or [[Wikipedia talk:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week|the Math Collaboration of the Week talk page.]]  Thanks a lot for your support!  [[User:Ral315|ral315]] 02:54, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)
279004 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279003 +++$+++ 279003 +++$+++ 2005-02-15 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.108518420E09 +++$+++ Would you mind responding there? (In addition, you can, of course, if you like, also make a more personal response either here or on my talk page ;-) Thanks.  +++$+++ :Would you mind responding there? (In addition, you can, of course, if you like, also make a more personal response either here or on my talk page ;-) Thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:47, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)

541148 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541148 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-02 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.220417940E09 +++$+++ What are the numbers [http:\/\/www.mcdmerkez.org\/ts_general\/azl\/belediye\/b-58.htm here]? Are they population figures?  +++$+++ What are the numbers [http://www.mcdmerkez.org/ts_general/azl/belediye/b-58.htm here]? Are they population figures? [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 21:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
541149 +++$+++ Phlegm Rooster +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541148 +++$+++ 541148 +++$+++ 2008-09-02 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.220420880E09 +++$+++ Did you notice that there are two [[Qazaxlar]]s? :)  +++$+++ *Did you notice that there are two [[Qazaxlar]]s? :) [[User:Phlegm Rooster|Phlegm Rooster]] ([[User talk:Phlegm Rooster|talk]]) 22:48, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
541150 +++$+++ Phlegm Rooster +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541148 +++$+++ 541148 +++$+++ 2008-09-02 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.220420880E09 +++$+++ I'll leave the GNS ref if I mess with any more stubs. Sorry.  +++$+++ *I'll leave the GNS ref if I mess with any more stubs. Sorry. [[User:Phlegm Rooster|Phlegm Rooster]] ([[User talk:Phlegm Rooster|talk]]) 22:48, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
541151 +++$+++ Phlegm Rooster +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541148 +++$+++ 541150 +++$+++ 2008-09-03 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.220449200E09 +++$+++ I suspected that these b\u0259l\u0259diyy\u0259si fill up the rayon; that is, everyone in Azerbaijan lives in one, rather like townships in the US. They are obviously centered on and named after traditional villages.  +++$+++ **I suspected that these bələdiyyəsi fill up the rayon; that is, everyone in Azerbaijan lives in one, rather like townships in the US. They are obviously centered on and named after traditional villages. [[User:Phlegm Rooster|Phlegm Rooster]] ([[User talk:Phlegm Rooster|talk]]) 06:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
541152 +++$+++ Phlegm Rooster +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541148 +++$+++ 541150 +++$+++ 2008-09-03 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.220449200E09 +++$+++ Speaking of village names, the second part of the name sometimes refers to the ethnic or clan identity of the people who founded the village. For example, - Qaraqoyunlu means Black Sheep, an \"empire\" that existed (according to [http:\/\/steppes.proboards23.com\/index.cgi?board=board07&action=display&thread=830 this page]) from 1365 to 1469. I'll bet Arablar means Arabs, Turkmen means Turks, and so forth. Any place that was named after something Russian or Armenian has been changed, e.g. ([[Kolkhoz Krasnyy Oktyabr]]).  +++$+++ **Speaking of village names, the second part of the name sometimes refers to the ethnic or clan identity of the people who founded the village. For example, - Qaraqoyunlu means Black Sheep, an "empire" that existed (according to [http://steppes.proboards23.com/index.cgi?board=board07&action=display&thread=830 this page]) from 1365 to 1469. I'll bet Arablar means Arabs, Turkmen means Turks, and so forth. Any place that was named after something Russian or Armenian has been changed, e.g. ([[Kolkhoz Krasnyy Oktyabr]]). [[User:Phlegm Rooster|Phlegm Rooster]] ([[User talk:Phlegm Rooster|talk]]) 06:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

279005 +++$+++ GeneralPatton +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-02-15 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.108536600E09 +++$+++ Hi, I have answered your inquiry over at [[Talk:Adolf Hitler]].  +++$+++ Hi, I have answered your inquiry over at [[Talk:Adolf Hitler]]. [[User:GeneralPatton|GeneralPatton]] 22:50, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
279006 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279005 +++$+++ 279005 +++$+++ 2005-02-15 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.108537620E09 +++$+++ Thanks  +++$+++ :Thanks [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:07, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
279007 +++$+++ GeneralPatton +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279005 +++$+++ 279006 +++$+++ 2005-02-15 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.108537740E09 +++$+++ Feel free to ask anything in specific if you want.  +++$+++ ::Feel free to ask anything in specific if you want. [[User:GeneralPatton|GeneralPatton]] 23:09, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

16863 +++$+++ Otis47 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-20 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.287558720E09 +++$+++ I do not appreciate how you speedy deleted my article on \"My Genie\" and my article on \"The Van Pels\" I spent hours researching them for the sole poupose of making an article. The information in [[People associated with Anne Frank]] is ridiculous. All of the facts in there can be proven false. I felt as if it was too invalid to even touch so i created another page and you deleted it. +++$+++ I do not appreciate how you speedy deleted my article on "My Genie" and my article on "The Van Pels" I spent hours researching them for the sole poupose of making an article. The information in [[People associated with Anne Frank]] is ridiculous. All of the facts in there can be proven false. I felt as if it was too invalid to even touch so i created another page and you deleted it.[[User:Otis47|Otis47]] ([[User talk:Otis47|talk]]) 00:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
16864 +++$+++ Boing! said Zebedee +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16863 +++$+++ 16863 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.287559500E09 +++$+++ You were told why your Van Pels article was deleted - because there is already an article about them that contains more information than your new one. If you dispute the content of [[People associated with Anne Frank]], you must discuss it on the article's Talk page, at [[Talk:People associated with Anne Frank]], and explain you reasoning there. You must not just unilaterally decide to create incompatible duplicates yourself - if everyone was allowed to create new versions of articles just because they disagreed with the original, we'd end up with hundreds of copies of articles, all saying different things. --  +++$+++ :You were told why your Van Pels article was deleted - because there is already an article about them that contains more information than your new one. If you dispute the content of [[People associated with Anne Frank]], you must discuss it on the article's Talk page, at [[Talk:People associated with Anne Frank]], and explain you reasoning there. You must not just unilaterally decide to create incompatible duplicates yourself - if everyone was allowed to create new versions of articles just because they disagreed with the original, we'd end up with hundreds of copies of articles, all saying different things. -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 00:25, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

16865 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16865 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-20 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.287621600E09 +++$+++ It's just plain silly not to have certain kinds of information on Wikipedia. +++$+++ It's just plain silly not to have certain kinds of information on Wikipedia.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 17:40, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
16866 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16865 +++$+++ 16865 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.287622260E09 +++$+++ This bank simply isn't big enough to have its own article. It's a local bank with a handful of branches, and sparse independent coverage at best. You can have it listed on the disamb page without a link at all, simply for reference. -  +++$+++ :This bank simply isn't big enough to have its own article. It's a local bank with a handful of branches, and sparse independent coverage at best. You can have it listed on the disamb page without a link at all, simply for reference. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 17:51, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
16867 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16865 +++$+++ 16866 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.287622380E09 +++$+++ Are you SURE? +++$+++ ::Are you SURE?[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 17:53, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
16868 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16865 +++$+++ 16867 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.287626160E09 +++$+++ Sure about which: size and notability of the bank, or whether you can have a mention without a link on a disamb page? If it's the bank's notability, I'm going by what's in the article. But I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, which is why I simply put a {{tl|gng}} tag on it and not a deletion notice of some sort. -  +++$+++ :::Sure about which: size and notability of the bank, or whether you can have a mention without a link on a disamb page? If it's the bank's notability, I'm going by what's in the article. But I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, which is why I simply put a {{tl|gng}} tag on it and not a deletion notice of some sort. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 18:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
16869 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16865 +++$+++ 16868 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.287628920E09 +++$+++ I was referring to the lack of a link on a disambiguation page. I was hoping I could find more on this bank but so far I haven't. There's another Natrional Bank of Commerce which seems even less notable, which has changed names. +++$+++ ::::I was referring to the lack of a link on a disambiguation page. I was hoping I could find more on this bank but so far I haven't. There's another Natrional Bank of Commerce which seems even less notable, which has changed names.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 19:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
16870 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16865 +++$+++ 16868 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.287629400E09 +++$+++ And as far as the notability, I do have to find another source for the bank's size since the one I found isn't allowed. I've used that source many times before but the information is usually duplicated somewhere else, so I've probably taken it out in most cases. I hope so, anyway. But it's pretty big considering the small number of branches. It's not like it's a small-town bank. +++$+++ ::::And as far as the notability, I do have to find another source for the bank's size since the one I found isn't allowed. I've used that source many times before but the information is usually duplicated somewhere else, so I've probably taken it out in most cases. I hope so, anyway. But it's pretty big considering the small number of branches. It's not like it's a small-town bank.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 19:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
16871 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16865 +++$+++ 16870 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.287635040E09 +++$+++ Keep looking for more sources. I'm not considering putting it up for deletion for a while, so don't worry. By the way, the other National Bank of Commerce that you may be running into was based here in my neck of the woods in Birmingham, Alabama. It has been taken over by RBC Bank. I think that was about three years ago. -  +++$+++ :::::Keep looking for more sources. I'm not considering putting it up for deletion for a while, so don't worry. By the way, the other National Bank of Commerce that you may be running into was based here in my neck of the woods in Birmingham, Alabama. It has been taken over by RBC Bank. I think that was about three years ago. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 21:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

279010 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279010 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-02-19 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.108881180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:33, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
279011 +++$+++ Dbenbenn +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279010 +++$+++ 279010 +++$+++ 2005-02-20 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.108894620E09 +++$+++ Yes, you're right.  Technically \"cyclic\" doesn't mean that \"any integer can be expressed as the addition or subtraction of a finite number of 1s.\"  I suspect that the distinction will be lost on anyone who doesn't already know what \"cyclic\" means.  How about \"since\" instead of \"meaning that\"?   +++$+++ : Yes, you're right.  Technically "cyclic" doesn't mean that "any integer can be expressed as the addition or subtraction of a finite number of 1s."  I suspect that the distinction will be lost on anyone who doesn't already know what "cyclic" means.  How about "since" instead of "meaning that"?  [[User:Dbenbenn|dbenbenn]] | [[User talk:Dbenbenn|talk]] 02:17, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

611141 +++$+++ Denimadept +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611141 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-27 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.280294340E09 +++$+++ BTW, it wasn't obvious to ME, and I ''went'' there.  I have to assume it will not be obvious to others as well. -  +++$+++ BTW, it wasn't obvious to ME, and I ''went'' there.  I have to assume it will not be obvious to others as well. - [[User:Denimadept|Denimadept]] ([[User talk:Denimadept|talk]]) 22:19, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
611142 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611141 +++$+++ 611141 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.280294520E09 +++$+++ That makes sense as the region has some weird weather. The thing is, I just hiked the North Country a couple of days ago and besides being cloudy and humid, it wasn't cool. Remember, one experience doesn't necessarily mean that it will apply for other days of the year.  +++$+++ :That makes sense as the region has some weird weather. The thing is, I just hiked the North Country a couple of days ago and besides being cloudy and humid, it wasn't cool. Remember, one experience doesn't necessarily mean that it will apply for other days of the year. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 22:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
611143 +++$+++ Denimadept +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611141 +++$+++ 611142 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.280294940E09 +++$+++ Okay, I can't argue with that.  It was also around 08:30 so it hadn't warmed up yet.  My point in the article was that one needed to be prepared.  No cell coverage, a bit of climbing, remote location. -  +++$+++ ::Okay, I can't argue with that.  It was also around 08:30 so it hadn't warmed up yet.  My point in the article was that one needed to be prepared.  No cell coverage, a bit of climbing, remote location. - [[User:Denimadept|Denimadept]] ([[User talk:Denimadept|talk]]) 22:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
611144 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611141 +++$+++ 611143 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.280295780E09 +++$+++ Heh, sounds like all of everything north of Mt. Washington: Nothing! For my father and I, we were shocked that none of the towns up there had any cell coverage. We did though almost travel up that way though but decided against that after it was over an hour away. I'm still iffy about including cell coverage details but I'll let it slide as a compromise since you are the expert here.  +++$+++ :::Heh, sounds like all of everything north of Mt. Washington: Nothing! For my father and I, we were shocked that none of the towns up there had any cell coverage. We did though almost travel up that way though but decided against that after it was over an hour away. I'm still iffy about including cell coverage details but I'll let it slide as a compromise since you are the expert here. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 22:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
611145 +++$+++ Denimadept +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611141 +++$+++ 611144 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.280296860E09 +++$+++ Only to the extent that I've been there.  I mentioned the cell phone coverage in case someone expected to be able to summon help.  I went up there alone, no one knew I'd gone, with no more than a bottle of water and a light jacket.  I did ''not'' finish. :-(   Maybe some day I'll try again as part of a group.  -  +++$+++ ::::Only to the extent that I've been there.  I mentioned the cell phone coverage in case someone expected to be able to summon help.  I went up there alone, no one knew I'd gone, with no more than a bottle of water and a light jacket.  I did ''not'' finish. :-(   Maybe some day I'll try again as part of a group.  - [[User:Denimadept|Denimadept]] ([[User talk:Denimadept|talk]]) 23:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
611146 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611141 +++$+++ 611145 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.280297580E09 +++$+++ Don't sweat it. I've done many things for Wikipedia and not told anyone. I've even hiked a mountain before without telling anyone (albeit it was a popular trail) with no water in 80 degree weather just to take photos of a few places for the site. That twenty minute hike was a bit exhaustive due to the latter. Good luck with your endeavour whenever it occurs!  +++$+++ :::::Don't sweat it. I've done many things for Wikipedia and not told anyone. I've even hiked a mountain before without telling anyone (albeit it was a popular trail) with no water in 80 degree weather just to take photos of a few places for the site. That twenty minute hike was a bit exhaustive due to the latter. Good luck with your endeavour whenever it occurs! [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 23:13, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

279012 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279012 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-02-20 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.108903800E09 +++$+++ \"Since\" is fine.  +++$+++ "Since" is fine. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:50, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
279013 +++$+++ ExplorerCDT +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279012 +++$+++ 279012 +++$+++ 2005-02-21 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.109041860E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia talk:Requested moves]] - help save Requested Moves, bring friends.  I'd hope you vote to keep voting at RM instead of running away to cabal at distant talk pages. &mdash; +++$+++ * [[Wikipedia talk:Requested moves]] - help save Requested Moves, bring friends.  I'd hope you vote to keep voting at RM instead of running away to cabal at distant talk pages. &mdash;[[User:ExplorerCDT|ExplorerCDT]] 19:11, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

96581 +++$+++ Trananh1980 +++$+++ DHN +++$+++ 96581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-26 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.301136900E09 +++$+++ Hi, how are you doing? I would like to ask you for help. My account has been locked for a month by sysop Dung005. The reason he did that, according to him, is that I reverted his warning more than 3 times. And I actually did that. However, the reason I did that is because he, I strongly believe, issued an illigimate warning. I ll go into  more detail. At first, we talked about the reason and the way he locked a new user who just made an edit for the first time in the article Nhan Quyen tai Vietnam. I argued with him about the ligitimacy and the process by which he did that. (You can read our discussion on the page Tin nhan cho bao quan vien in the section called Ve viec cam thanh vien Modesldale-and don't forget to look at the history page.) While discussing, he used insulting words to me, resulting in my deleting his insulting words (i used <nowiki><s><\/s><\/nowiki>). That's the reason he issued the first warning. I didn't accept that. And I reverted it. To conclude, please look for the way Sysop Dung005 locked the new user, and the way he issued various warnings to me. I believe that all of what he did is illegitimate and shows signs of abusing the sysop tools. While waiting for the expiry of the locking, I will be active in English. I use a permanent IP address, so i have no way to give any feedback on my Vietnamese page. Thank you.-- +++$+++ Hi, how are you doing? I would like to ask you for help. My account has been locked for a month by sysop Dung005. The reason he did that, according to him, is that I reverted his warning more than 3 times. And I actually did that. However, the reason I did that is because he, I strongly believe, issued an illigimate warning. I ll go into  more detail. At first, we talked about the reason and the way he locked a new user who just made an edit for the first time in the article Nhan Quyen tai Vietnam. I argued with him about the ligitimacy and the process by which he did that. (You can read our discussion on the page Tin nhan cho bao quan vien in the section called Ve viec cam thanh vien Modesldale-and don't forget to look at the history page.) While discussing, he used insulting words to me, resulting in my deleting his insulting words (i used <nowiki><s></s></nowiki>). That's the reason he issued the first warning. I didn't accept that. And I reverted it. To conclude, please look for the way Sysop Dung005 locked the new user, and the way he issued various warnings to me. I believe that all of what he did is illegitimate and shows signs of abusing the sysop tools. While waiting for the expiry of the locking, I will be active in English. I use a permanent IP address, so i have no way to give any feedback on my Vietnamese page. Thank you.--[[User:Trananh1980|Trananh1980]] ([[User talk:Trananh1980|talk]]) 03:55, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
96582 +++$+++ DHN +++$+++ DHN +++$+++ 96581 +++$+++ 96581 +++$+++ 2011-03-26 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.301142000E09 +++$+++ I'm going to try to look through the relevant comments this weekend.  +++$+++ :I'm going to try to look through the relevant comments this weekend. [[User:DHN|DHN]] ([[User talk:DHN#top|talk]]) 05:20, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
96583 +++$+++ Trananh1980 +++$+++ DHN +++$+++ 96581 +++$+++ 96582 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.301635020E09 +++$+++ By now, I hope you have finished reading the discussions between me and user dung005. If you do not agree with me on something, just make it clear to me. I ll understand. Thanks-- +++$+++ ::By now, I hope you have finished reading the discussions between me and user dung005. If you do not agree with me on something, just make it clear to me. I ll understand. Thanks--[[User:Trananh1980|Trananh1980]] ([[User talk:Trananh1980|talk]]) 22:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
96584 +++$+++ DHN +++$+++ DHN +++$+++ 96581 +++$+++ 96583 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.301639280E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, it's been a hectic week and I haven't had time to do anything.  As soon as I find some free time I'll take a look.  +++$+++ :::I'm sorry, it's been a hectic week and I haven't had time to do anything.  As soon as I find some free time I'll take a look. [[User:DHN|DHN]] ([[User talk:DHN#top|talk]]) 23:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
96585 +++$+++ Trananh1980 +++$+++ DHN +++$+++ 96581 +++$+++ 96584 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.301907660E09 +++$+++ No, I cannot edit any page on vi.wiki. Anyway, this is a good time for me to calm down and refresh my mind. If you have spare time, I will appreciate your help. But if you don't, that's fine. I m okay. -- +++$+++ ::::No, I cannot edit any page on vi.wiki. Anyway, this is a good time for me to calm down and refresh my mind. If you have spare time, I will appreciate your help. But if you don't, that's fine. I m okay. --[[User:Trananh1980|Trananh1980]] ([[User talk:Trananh1980|talk]]) 02:01, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
96586 +++$+++ Trananh1980 +++$+++ DHN +++$+++ 96581 +++$+++ 96585 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.301909880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for helping. However, don't you think user Dung005 has to take responsibility for issuing illigitimate warnings? How would you deal with that? He thought I could not delete his discussion for his rudeness?-- +++$+++ :::::Thanks for helping. However, don't you think user Dung005 has to take responsibility for issuing illigitimate warnings? How would you deal with that? He thought I could not delete his discussion for his rudeness?--[[User:Trananh1980|Trananh1980]] ([[User talk:Trananh1980|talk]]) 02:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
96587 +++$+++ ebe123 +++$+++ DHN +++$+++ 96581 +++$+++ 96586 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.303875120E09 +++$+++ Well, I checked the wikipedia and there is nothing preventing you to delete comments on ''your'' talk page.  ~~ +++$+++ ::::::Well, I checked the wikipedia and there is nothing preventing you to delete comments on ''your'' talk page.  ~~[[User:ebe123|<span style="color:#21421E;font-weight:bold">EBE123</span>]]~~ <sup>[[User talk:Ebe123|<span style="color:#0000FF">talk</span>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ebe123|Contribs]]</sub> 20:32, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
96588 +++$+++ Trananh1980 +++$+++ DHN +++$+++ 96581 +++$+++ 96587 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.303967520E09 +++$+++ According to [[Wikipedia:User pages#Removal of comments, notices, and warnings]], users can't delete warnings issued by system operators. The reason I did that is because I believe the warning i received was '''illegitimate'''. I should have talked to other sysops, which I did not.-- +++$+++ :::::::According to [[Wikipedia:User pages#Removal of comments, notices, and warnings]], users can't delete warnings issued by system operators. The reason I did that is because I believe the warning i received was '''illegitimate'''. I should have talked to other sysops, which I did not.--[[User:Trananh1980|Trananh1980]] ([[User talk:Trananh1980|talk]]) 22:12, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

279015 +++$+++ WHEELER +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279015 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-08 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.110335760E09 +++$+++ The article [[vanavsos]] is up for deletion.  Can you please help in this regard.  Second, I am having difficulty with [http:\/\/www.wikinfo.org\/wiki.php?title=Classical_definition_of_republic Wikinfo:Classical definition of republic] and am having trouble on [[Talk:Republic]] because they won't allow an external link.  It was deleted off of Wikipedia, and I believe it needs to come back on.  A serious mistake in deleting this article.  Thanks for your time. +++$+++ The article [[vanavsos]] is up for deletion.  Can you please help in this regard.  Second, I am having difficulty with [http://www.wikinfo.org/wiki.php?title=Classical_definition_of_republic Wikinfo:Classical definition of republic] and am having trouble on [[Talk:Republic]] because they won't allow an external link.  It was deleted off of Wikipedia, and I believe it needs to come back on.  A serious mistake in deleting this article.  Thanks for your time.[[User:WHEELER|WHEELER]] 18:36, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
279016 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279015 +++$+++ 279015 +++$+++ 2005-03-10 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.110519780E09 +++$+++ I've read over [[vanavsos]] and the associated vfd debate, and although I think the page may contain some original research which needs to be cleaned up and perhaps a new title, I've voted to keep for now.  +++$+++ :I've read over [[vanavsos]] and the associated vfd debate, and although I think the page may contain some original research which needs to be cleaned up and perhaps a new title, I've voted to keep for now. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:43, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

16872 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16872 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-22 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.287794580E09 +++$+++ There are actually half a dozen of those. I'm working on possible articles for all of them, but the one in Superior and the one in Birmingham, and another one in Mississippi that may not be the one in Birmingham, are all in the same boat as the one in Superior. I thought Superior was a large city but when I looked at its article, it's not. So that doesn't help my case. +++$+++ There are actually half a dozen of those. I'm working on possible articles for all of them, but the one in Superior and the one in Birmingham, and another one in Mississippi that may not be the one in Birmingham, are all in the same boat as the one in Superior. I thought Superior was a large city but when I looked at its article, it's not. So that doesn't help my case.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 17:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
16873 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16872 +++$+++ 16872 +++$+++ 2010-10-22 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.287794820E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that was my primary issue. Superior is relatively small. I think the Mississippi bank is tied to the one in Memphis, but I'm not sure. -  +++$+++ :Yeah, that was my primary issue. Superior is relatively small. I think the Mississippi bank is tied to the one in Memphis, but I'm not sure. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 17:47, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
16874 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16872 +++$+++ 16873 +++$+++ 2010-10-22 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.287796620E09 +++$+++ I got the impressiion it wasn't, and the reason for that bank changing names was the confusion. I have yet to find proof either way. +++$+++ ::I got the impressiion it wasn't, and the reason for that bank changing names was the confusion. I have yet to find proof either way.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 18:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
16875 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16872 +++$+++ 16874 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.288149180E09 +++$+++ Okay, [http:\/\/findarticles.com\/p\/articles\/mi_m0EIN\/is_2005_Oct_11\/ai_n15683142\/ here] is what I think is proof the Mississippi bank is not the one in Memphis, but they bought a Memphis bank which just made things confusing. I don't think Cadence Bank is notable enough for an article, which is a real shame. I'm sure others have been confused and it would help to have this information on Wikipedia. +++$+++ :::Okay, [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2005_Oct_11/ai_n15683142/ here] is what I think is proof the Mississippi bank is not the one in Memphis, but they bought a Memphis bank which just made things confusing. I don't think Cadence Bank is notable enough for an article, which is a real shame. I'm sure others have been confused and it would help to have this information on Wikipedia.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 20:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
16876 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16872 +++$+++ 16875 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.288150440E09 +++$+++ The other National Bank of Commerce is now RBC. If you look [http:\/\/www.bizjournals.com\/birmingham\/stories\/2008\/06\/16\/daily23.html here], that one might be worthy of an article. +++$+++ ::::The other National Bank of Commerce is now RBC. If you look [http://www.bizjournals.com/birmingham/stories/2008/06/16/daily23.html here], that one might be worthy of an article.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 20:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

279017 +++$+++ Curps +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-08 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.110352020E09 +++$+++ I have clarified at [[Talk:Lesch-Nyhan_syndrome#Accuracy_concerns]] --  +++$+++ I have clarified at [[Talk:Lesch-Nyhan_syndrome#Accuracy_concerns]] -- [[User:Curps|Curps]] 23:07, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
279018 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279017 +++$+++ 279017 +++$+++ 2005-03-10 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.110520020E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:47, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

541163 +++$+++ Cobaltbluetony +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-16 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.221598860E09 +++$+++ I take exception to my edits [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=C\u0259f\u0259rli_%2839\xb0_11%27_N_48\xb0_13%27_E%29%2C_Jalilabad&diff=238666680&oldid=238666347 being called vandalism].  Please show me a discussion or MoS page that says we put actual coordinates in article titles like [[C\u0259f\u0259rli (39\xb0 11' N 48\xb0 13' E), Jalilabad]], and I'll be satisfied.  Thanks. -&nbsp;<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ I take exception to my edits [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cəfərli_%2839°_11%27_N_48°_13%27_E%29%2C_Jalilabad&diff=238666680&oldid=238666347 being called vandalism].  Please show me a discussion or MoS page that says we put actual coordinates in article titles like [[Cəfərli (39° 11' N 48° 13' E), Jalilabad]], and I'll be satisfied.  Thanks. -&nbsp;<font face="Verdana">[[User:Cobaltbluetony|CobaltBlueTony™]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User_talk:Cobaltbluetony#top|talk]]</sub></font> 14:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
541164 +++$+++ Cobaltbluetony +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541163 +++$+++ 541163 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.221601080E09 +++$+++ Okay, I see why you did it, but I still am not aware of any precedent.  I would suggest [[Dzhafarly, Jalilabad]] for [[C\u0259f\u0259rli (39\xb0 10' N 48\xb0 26' E), Jalilabad]] (with coordinating disambigs) and [[Dzhafar-Beyli]] for [[C\u0259f\u0259rli (39\xb0 11' N 48\xb0 13' E), Jalilabad]].  I'm still having issues finding place names that use coordinates in the actual title.  I can't see someone searching for actual coordinate named places; why make redirects for those names to go to coordinate-name article that no one would search for? -&nbsp;<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Okay, I see why you did it, but I still am not aware of any precedent.  I would suggest [[Dzhafarly, Jalilabad]] for [[Cəfərli (39° 10' N 48° 26' E), Jalilabad]] (with coordinating disambigs) and [[Dzhafar-Beyli]] for [[Cəfərli (39° 11' N 48° 13' E), Jalilabad]].  I'm still having issues finding place names that use coordinates in the actual title.  I can't see someone searching for actual coordinate named places; why make redirects for those names to go to coordinate-name article that no one would search for? -&nbsp;<font face="Verdana">[[User:Cobaltbluetony|CobaltBlueTony™]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User_talk:Cobaltbluetony#top|talk]]</sub></font> 14:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

279020 +++$+++ WHEELER +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279020 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-10 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.110494460E09 +++$+++ Can I get your help in this regard?  +++$+++ Can I get your help in this regard? [[User:WHEELER|WHEELER]] 14:41, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
279021 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279020 +++$+++ 279020 +++$+++ 2005-03-10 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.110520380E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure what help I can provide in this matter. However, I will follow the issue, and do whatever seems appropriate to me.  +++$+++ :I'm not sure what help I can provide in this matter. However, I will follow the issue, and do whatever seems appropriate to me. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:53, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

16877 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16877 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-26 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.288153800E09 +++$+++ {{outdent}}Wait, forget might. This article is a LOOOONG way from completion. There are lots of newspaper articles. I'm quitting for today, but that article is far from complete. +++$+++ {{outdent}}Wait, forget might. This article is a LOOOONG way from completion. There are lots of newspaper articles. I'm quitting for today, but that article is far from complete.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 21:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
16878 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16877 +++$+++ 16877 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.288172340E09 +++$+++ Not a problem. And you just taught me a new tag -- {{tl|outdent}}. Cool! -  +++$+++ :Not a problem. And you just taught me a new tag -- {{tl|outdent}}. Cool! - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 02:39, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
16879 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16877 +++$+++ 16878 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.288225740E09 +++$+++ I figured you being from Birmingham or near there you would be more likely to give my article more scrutiny. +++$+++ ::I figured you being from Birmingham or near there you would be more likely to give my article more scrutiny.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 17:29, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

279022 +++$+++ WHEELER +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-10 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.110508200E09 +++$+++ There is a page classicists can link up on and it is here at: [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by fields of interest C-D#Classics]].  I invite you to place your name so that Classicists can find each other and corroborate on things together. Thank you for your time. +++$+++ There is a page classicists can link up on and it is here at: [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by fields of interest C-D#Classics]].  I invite you to place your name so that Classicists can find each other and corroborate on things together. Thank you for your time.[[User:WHEELER|WHEELER]] 18:30, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
279023 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279022 +++$+++ 279022 +++$+++ 2005-03-10 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.110521400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for inviting me to add my name to [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by fields of interest C-D#Classics]]. However, although I'm very interested in the classics (I've read Plato and Aristotle and lots more), I was trained as a mathematician, and I hardly qualify as a classicist.  +++$+++ :Thanks for inviting me to add my name to [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by fields of interest C-D#Classics]]. However, although I'm very interested in the classics (I've read Plato and Aristotle and lots more), I was trained as a mathematician, and I hardly qualify as a classicist. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:10, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

541167 +++$+++ Ricky81682 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-02 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.222959120E09 +++$+++ Question about your editing at [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Incidents#Please_have_exact_change]].  --  +++$+++ Question about your editing at [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Please_have_exact_change]].  -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 07:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
541168 +++$+++ Fritzpoll +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541167 +++$+++ 541167 +++$+++ 2008-10-02 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.222979880E09 +++$+++ If you're using the very old data from an early trial of FritzpollBot, then this data is inaccurate.  Whilst I understand your desire for full coverage, this is against the spirit of consensus achieved during that discussion  +++$+++ :If you're using the very old data from an early trial of FritzpollBot, then this data is inaccurate.  Whilst I understand your desire for full coverage, this is against the spirit of consensus achieved during that discussion [[User:Fritzpoll|Fritzpoll]] ([[User talk:Fritzpoll|talk]]) 13:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

16881 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-20 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.287644040E09 +++$+++ I consider the assertion that someone (in this case [[Robert A. Sutermeister]]), has published several books (not self published), as an assertion or indication of possible significance, and to pass speedy. Whether the person is actually notable is another matter, of course. but that one of them has 2 major academic reviews is in my opinion fully enough to satisfy WP:AUTHOR, & the reviews are 3rd party sources.   ''' +++$+++ I consider the assertion that someone (in this case [[Robert A. Sutermeister]]), has published several books (not self published), as an assertion or indication of possible significance, and to pass speedy. Whether the person is actually notable is another matter, of course. but that one of them has 2 major academic reviews is in my opinion fully enough to satisfy WP:AUTHOR, & the reviews are 3rd party sources.   '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 23:54, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
16882 +++$+++ JCbot +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16881 +++$+++ 16881 +++$+++ 2010-10-24 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.287908520E09 +++$+++ \u2014<\/small>  +++$+++ : —</small> [[User:JCbot|JCbot]] ([[User talk:JCbot|talk]]) 01:22, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

16884 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-30 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.288422780E09 +++$+++ This one is not [[WP:CRYSTAL]], as the film consists of material already shot for [[Jackass 3D]], and much like [[Jackass 2.5]] will be released on the heels of its predecessor in order to take advantage of the predecessor's popularity.  I am a bit surprised that your nomination stated that you could not independently verify that this film will actually be produced,[http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=%22Jackass%203.5%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&oe=utf8&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=nws:1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn] as sources do speak toward a possible DVD release as early as Christmas 2010,[http:\/\/www.mtv.com\/news\/articles\/1648018\/20100916\/story.jhtml][http:\/\/www.collider.com\/2010\/10\/23\/jackass-3d-dvd-jackass-3-5-johnny-knoxville\/] and [[Paramount Studios]] is even considering a theatrical release.[http:\/\/www.filmjunk.com\/2010\/10\/19\/paramount-considering-theatrical-release-for-jackass-3-5\/][http:\/\/www.slashfilm.com\/2010\/10\/19\/jackass-3-5-headed-to-theaters\/][http:\/\/www.avclub.com\/articles\/jackass-35-may-be-in-theaters-within-the-next-few,46522\/] Following the example of Jackass 2.5 being part of [[Jackass 2]], I suggest this be merged and redirected to Jackass 3D.  Care to comment at the AFD?  ''' +++$+++ This one is not [[WP:CRYSTAL]], as the film consists of material already shot for [[Jackass 3D]], and much like [[Jackass 2.5]] will be released on the heels of its predecessor in order to take advantage of the predecessor's popularity.  I am a bit surprised that your nomination stated that you could not independently verify that this film will actually be produced,[http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Jackass%203.5%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&oe=utf8&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=nws:1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn] as sources do speak toward a possible DVD release as early as Christmas 2010,[http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1648018/20100916/story.jhtml][http://www.collider.com/2010/10/23/jackass-3d-dvd-jackass-3-5-johnny-knoxville/] and [[Paramount Studios]] is even considering a theatrical release.[http://www.filmjunk.com/2010/10/19/paramount-considering-theatrical-release-for-jackass-3-5/][http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/10/19/jackass-3-5-headed-to-theaters/][http://www.avclub.com/articles/jackass-35-may-be-in-theaters-within-the-next-few,46522/] Following the example of Jackass 2.5 being part of [[Jackass 2]], I suggest this be merged and redirected to Jackass 3D.  Care to comment at the AFD?  '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 00:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
16885 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16884 +++$+++ 16884 +++$+++ 2010-10-30 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.288496100E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your looking back in, and am sorry to learn of your computer loss. ''' +++$+++ *I appreciate your looking back in, and am sorry to learn of your computer loss. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 20:35, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

527102 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-07 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.220782860E09 +++$+++ When you look at the article, do you see any text that is sandwiched between the images? I couldn't see it nor could user CaribbeanHQ and we were wondering if the problem was the resolution of the reviewers computer.  +++$+++ When you look at the article, do you see any text that is sandwiched between the images? I couldn't see it nor could user CaribbeanHQ and we were wondering if the problem was the resolution of the reviewers computer. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 03:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
527103 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527102 +++$+++ 527102 +++$+++ 2008-09-07 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.220841000E09 +++$+++ Perfect, I agree. I eliminated that part because it really dosen't add to the understanding of the subject. Now, tell me if there is any \"sandwiching\" left?  +++$+++ *Perfect, I agree. I eliminated that part because it really dosen't add to the understanding of the subject. Now, tell me if there is any "sandwiching" left? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 19:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

279030 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-18 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.111209000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:10, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
279031 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279030 +++$+++ 279030 +++$+++ 2005-03-18 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.111209720E09 +++$+++ Most people did not reply because I think nobody cares :) So the best thing to do is, as you plan, to just go ahead with it.  +++$+++ : Most people did not reply because I think nobody cares :) So the best thing to do is, as you plan, to just go ahead with it. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] 21:22, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
279032 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279030 +++$+++ 279031 +++$+++ 2005-03-18 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.111209840E09 +++$+++ PS The table looks good.  +++$+++ :: PS The table looks good. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] 21:24, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

16888 +++$+++ Burwellian +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16888 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-13 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.289649000E09 +++$+++ Beat me to it; got an edit conflict as I was adding a delete tag having just looked over his contrib history :) -  +++$+++ Beat me to it; got an edit conflict as I was adding a delete tag having just looked over his contrib history :) - [[User:Burwellian|JVG]] ([[User talk:Burwellian|talk]]) 03:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
16889 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16888 +++$+++ 16888 +++$+++ 2010-11-13 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.289649180E09 +++$+++ Usually I'm the slow one. -  +++$+++ :Usually I'm the slow one. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 03:53, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

614484 +++$+++ Mikkerpikker +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-05 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.139136900E09 +++$+++ That\u2019s still not quite right but I can\u2019t think of anything better (\u201chighlighted\u201d instead of \u201cpointed out\u201d maybe). Let me know what you think,  +++$+++ That’s still not quite right but I can’t think of anything better (“highlighted” instead of “pointed out” maybe). Let me know what you think, [[User:Mikkerpikker|Mikkerpikker]] [[User talk:Mikkerpikker|...]] 02:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
614485 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614484 +++$+++ 614484 +++$+++ 2006-02-05 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.139158260E09 +++$+++ The \"particularly\" may be unnecessary, I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. .... +++$+++ :The "particularly" may be unnecessary, I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. ....[[User:Dave souza|dave souza]]: [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 08:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
614486 +++$+++ Mikkerpikker +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 614484 +++$+++ 614485 +++$+++ 2006-02-06 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.139248860E09 +++$+++ I like it! In fact, I think I'm gonna go change the article to reflect your proposed change... (think \"particularly\" is not stricly speaking necessary but ok in context).  +++$+++ ::I like it! In fact, I think I'm gonna go change the article to reflect your proposed change... (think "particularly" is not stricly speaking necessary but ok in context). [[User:Mikkerpikker|Mikkerpikker]] [[User talk:Mikkerpikker|...]] 10:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

279034 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-18 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.111185600E09 +++$+++ Hi Sannse. FYI, I noticed that you blocked IP [[User_talk:65.39.159.10|65.39.159.10]] for vandalism (I presume). Well the IP seems now to be unblocked and back to vandalizing, see: [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lady_Macbeth_%28historical%29&diff=prev&oldid=11249037]].  +++$+++ Hi Sannse. FYI, I noticed that you blocked IP [[User_talk:65.39.159.10|65.39.159.10]] for vandalism (I presume). Well the IP seems now to be unblocked and back to vandalizing, see: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lady_Macbeth_%28historical%29&diff=prev&oldid=11249037]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:40, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
279035 +++$+++ Sannse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279034 +++$+++ 279034 +++$+++ 2005-03-20 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.111390560E09 +++$+++ Looks like an isolated one, but he can be blocked quickly enough if it continues.  Best to report such things at [[WP:VIP]] or [[WP:AN]] though, you are more likely to catch someone there is quick action is needed - I've been mostly away for a week or two --  +++$+++ :Looks like an isolated one, but he can be blocked quickly enough if it continues.  Best to report such things at [[WP:VIP]] or [[WP:AN]] though, you are more likely to catch someone there is quick action is needed - I've been mostly away for a week or two -- [[User:Sannse|sannse]] [[User talk:Sannse|(talk)]] 23:36, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

279037 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279037 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-20 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.111383480E09 +++$+++ Hi Xiong. I noticed your comment about merging [[Graph theory]] and [[Graph (mathematics)]] at [[Wikipedia:Duplicate articles]]. This was discussed at some length here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#Graph_.28mathematics.29_vs_Graph_theory. The majority view was to keep them seperate.  +++$+++ Hi Xiong. I noticed your comment about merging [[Graph theory]] and [[Graph (mathematics)]] at [[Wikipedia:Duplicate articles]]. This was discussed at some length here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#Graph_.28mathematics.29_vs_Graph_theory. The majority view was to keep them seperate. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:38, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
279038 +++$+++ Xiong +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279037 +++$+++ 279037 +++$+++ 2005-03-21 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.111402500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pointing that out. Please see my detailed comment there, at the bottom of the discussion. You are first in line to be tapped as my buddy expert.  &mdash;  +++$+++ :Thanks for pointing that out. Please see my detailed comment there, at the bottom of the discussion. You are first in line to be tapped as my buddy expert.  &mdash; [[User:Xiong|Xiong]] ([[User talk:Xiong|talk]]) 02:55, 2005 Mar 21 (UTC)

279039 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279039 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-21 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.111441260E09 +++$+++ I'd be glad to help any way I can. But I'm not particularly knowledgeable in this field. You might want to look here [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics\/Participants]], for people more qualified (besides the other editors of those pages of course).  +++$+++ I'd be glad to help any way I can. But I'm not particularly knowledgeable in this field. You might want to look here [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Participants]], for people more qualified (besides the other editors of those pages of course). [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:41, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
279040 +++$+++ Xiong +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279039 +++$+++ 279039 +++$+++ 2005-03-21 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.111447140E09 +++$+++ May I consider you on board?  &mdash;  +++$+++ : May I consider you on board?  &mdash; [[User:Xiong|Xiong]] ([[User talk:Xiong|talk]]) 15:19, 2005 Mar 21 (UTC)

279042 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279042 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-21 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.111450560E09 +++$+++ By the way, as for saying on my user page that I am a topologist (actually it says \"Alleged Categorical Topologist\"), that's true, however notice it ''also'' says that I was \"Once Considered Talented\", the operative word being ''once''.  +++$+++ By the way, as for saying on my user page that I am a topologist (actually it says "Alleged Categorical Topologist"), that's true, however notice it ''also'' says that I was "Once Considered Talented", the operative word being ''once''. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:16, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
279043 +++$+++ Xiong +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279042 +++$+++ 279042 +++$+++ 2005-03-22 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.111491000E09 +++$+++ Enjoy your vacation -- or, if you should read this on your return, Yay! Now get back to work.  &mdash;  +++$+++ : Enjoy your vacation -- or, if you should read this on your return, Yay! Now get back to work.  &mdash; [[User:Xiong|Xiong]] ([[User talk:Xiong|talk]]) 03:30, 2005 Mar 22 (UTC)

16900 +++$+++ WikiDan61 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16900 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-14 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.297730880E09 +++$+++ You [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=SNAS_Higher_Secondary_School&action=historysubmit&diff=413899485&oldid=413898788 tagged] [[SNAS Higher Secondary School]] as a page lacking sufficient context.  The article, as it stood when you tagged it, clearly identified the subject as a secondary school in [[Mandi Gobindgarh]]. That's enough context to identify the topic and find any further sources.  The fact that there are not further sources means that the article is not [[WP:V|verifiable]], and should not be allowed to stand in its present form.  I had redirected it to the article about the town in which the school is located, as this is the common [[WP:OUTCOMES#EDUCATION|outcome]] regarding non-notable schools, but the article's original author chose to undo that redirect.  I will contact that editor separately. <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ You [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SNAS_Higher_Secondary_School&action=historysubmit&diff=413899485&oldid=413898788 tagged] [[SNAS Higher Secondary School]] as a page lacking sufficient context.  The article, as it stood when you tagged it, clearly identified the subject as a secondary school in [[Mandi Gobindgarh]]. That's enough context to identify the topic and find any further sources.  The fact that there are not further sources means that the article is not [[WP:V|verifiable]], and should not be allowed to stand in its present form.  I had redirected it to the article about the town in which the school is located, as this is the common [[WP:OUTCOMES#EDUCATION|outcome]] regarding non-notable schools, but the article's original author chose to undo that redirect.  I will contact that editor separately. <font color="green">[[User:WikiDan61|WikiDan61]]</font><font color="green" size="5px"></font><sup>[[User talk:WikiDan61|ChatMe!]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiDan61|ReadMe!!]]</sub> 16:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
16901 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16900 +++$+++ 16900 +++$+++ 2011-02-15 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.297775640E09 +++$+++ OK, whatever. -  +++$+++ :OK, whatever. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 05:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

279046 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-04-12 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.113357960E09 +++$+++ Welcome back! Hope you had a good time, and are now ready to plounge back in the virtual world. :)  +++$+++ Welcome back! Hope you had a good time, and are now ready to plounge back in the virtual world. :) [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] 19:06, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
279047 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279046 +++$+++ 279046 +++$+++ 2005-04-12 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.113368460E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'm back, but I'm a bit addled, so \"plounge\" sounds about right ;-)  +++$+++ :Thanks. I'm back, but I'm a bit addled, so "plounge" sounds about right ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:01, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

16903 +++$+++ Lear's Fool +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-19 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.298132520E09 +++$+++ Hello Realkyhick. I am just letting you know that I have converted the [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]] tag that you placed on [[:Alan Bass]] to a [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion]] tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you.  &nbsp; -- ''''' +++$+++ Hello Realkyhick. I am just letting you know that I have converted the [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]] tag that you placed on [[:Alan Bass]] to a [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion]] tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you.  &nbsp; -- '''''[[User:Lear's Fool|Lear's]] [[User Talk:Lear's Fool|Fool]]''''' 08:22, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
16904 +++$+++ Lear's Fool +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16903 +++$+++ 16903 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.298148660E09 +++$+++ {{whisperback|Lear's Fool}}&nbsp; -- ''''' +++$+++ :{{whisperback|Lear's Fool}}&nbsp; -- '''''[[User:Lear's Fool|Lear's]] [[User Talk:Lear's Fool|Fool]]''''' 12:51, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

279048 +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-04-28 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.114710660E09 +++$+++ By the way, do you know how widespread the term ''downhill simplex method'' is? I only knew ''Nelder-Mead simplex method'', but numerical optimization is not quite my field.  --  +++$+++ By the way, do you know how widespread the term ''downhill simplex method'' is? I only knew ''Nelder-Mead simplex method'', but numerical optimization is not quite my field.  -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 10:51, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
279049 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279048 +++$+++ 279048 +++$+++ 2005-04-28 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.114729920E09 +++$+++ By the way I discovered \"downhill simplex\" while looking into [[Pearson distribution]] (they were created by the same editor), which demonstrates that one of the best ways to get a valid stub expanded is to list it on VFD ;-)  +++$+++ :By the way I discovered "downhill simplex" while looking into [[Pearson distribution]] (they were created by the same editor), which demonstrates that one of the best ways to get a valid stub expanded is to list it on VFD ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:12, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)

541194 +++$+++  +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541194 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-06 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.231304940E09 +++$+++ I don't see what's so unverifiable about this list at all. I've expanded it to include all the malls in Pennsylvania that I know of (I was bored one month so I made a list of every mall in the US, past and pressent).  +++$+++ I don't see what's so unverifiable about this list at all. I've expanded it to include all the malls in Pennsylvania that I know of (I was bored one month so I made a list of every mall in the US, past and pressent). [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 21:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
541195 +++$+++  +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541194 +++$+++ 541194 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.231307400E09 +++$+++ I don't know, there haven't been any disputes on the other mall lists as to what constitutes a \"mall\". I still don't see what's unmaintanable about it either.  +++$+++ *I don't know, there haven't been any disputes on the other mall lists as to what constitutes a "mall". I still don't see what's unmaintanable about it either. [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 21:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
541196 +++$+++  +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541194 +++$+++ 541195 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.231367280E09 +++$+++ As for the list, I think that in a case like this, a list can say more than a category can. The list can give details like each mall's size, when it opened\/closed, any other historical significance \u2014 and things like that can't really be covered in a category. Now, if it were [[List of malls in Wyoming]], it might be different since I know Wyoming only has three.  +++$+++ :*As for the list, I think that in a case like this, a list can say more than a category can. The list can give details like each mall's size, when it opened/closed, any other historical significance — and things like that can't really be covered in a category. Now, if it were [[List of malls in Wyoming]], it might be different since I know Wyoming only has three. [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 14:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

541198 +++$+++ Wikidea +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-07 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.231353420E09 +++$+++ Hello Carlo, you do realise that you are in effect trying to say that articles should never be created as stubs. That is a very silly position to take, and I'll look forward to you being a little bit more thoughtful in future! I'm sure that if you read the deletion policies, it does not say things should be deleted when there is clear potential for them to develop into subjects in their own right. I know you're just trying to do a good job, cleaning up and so on though. But it's a good thing that it wasn't an angry red haired Scottish person that made these articles! '''<font color=\"red\">[[User:Wikidea|Wik]]<\/font><font color=\"gold\"> +++$+++ Hello Carlo, you do realise that you are in effect trying to say that articles should never be created as stubs. That is a very silly position to take, and I'll look forward to you being a little bit more thoughtful in future! I'm sure that if you read the deletion policies, it does not say things should be deleted when there is clear potential for them to develop into subjects in their own right. I know you're just trying to do a good job, cleaning up and so on though. But it's a good thing that it wasn't an angry red haired Scottish person that made these articles! '''<font color="red">[[User:Wikidea|Wik]]</font><font color="gold">[[User:Wikidea|idea]]</font>''' 10:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
541199 +++$+++ Wikidea +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541198 +++$+++ 541198 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.231452960E09 +++$+++ The answer is that [[Albanian property law]] would be a good stub, because at some point people will want to write an article for it! I agree about [[Perth weather]] or [[Scottish house]], but they are not articles that are likely to have a substantial amount of academic literature to put in. I know you see the sense in this. As I said, putting in the stub is valuable because someone will expand on it. Here's what an amazon search brings, eg on [http:\/\/www.amazon.co.uk\/s\/ref=nb_ss_w_h_?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Scottish+family+law Scottish Family Law]. You've got a whole country of students learning this stuff. It's valuable, so don't go on wasting time here. There's so many more useless things you could be deleting. :) '''<font color=\"red\">[[User:Wikidea|Wik]]<\/font><font color=\"gold\"> +++$+++ :The answer is that [[Albanian property law]] would be a good stub, because at some point people will want to write an article for it! I agree about [[Perth weather]] or [[Scottish house]], but they are not articles that are likely to have a substantial amount of academic literature to put in. I know you see the sense in this. As I said, putting in the stub is valuable because someone will expand on it. Here's what an amazon search brings, eg on [http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_ss_w_h_?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Scottish+family+law Scottish Family Law]. You've got a whole country of students learning this stuff. It's valuable, so don't go on wasting time here. There's so many more useless things you could be deleting. :) '''<font color="red">[[User:Wikidea|Wik]]</font><font color="gold">[[User:Wikidea|idea]]</font>''' 14:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
541200 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541198 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.231458720E09 +++$+++ In any case, Wikidea, the stub being discussed at the AfD was justified because you yourself were actually writing articles on the subject and thus following up--you merely hadn't gotten to this one yet. Actually, we would almost certainly have enough information for Perth weather, and as for Scottish houses: Worldcat shows, on the art and architecture aspect alone, both for great houses and the working classes  [http:\/\/www.worldcat.org\/search?q=houses--scotland&fq=dt%3Abks+%3E+-fm%3Afic+%3E+s0%3A14000000&qt=facet_s0%3A 86 books]--let alone articles.  ''' +++$+++ :::In any case, Wikidea, the stub being discussed at the AfD was justified because you yourself were actually writing articles on the subject and thus following up--you merely hadn't gotten to this one yet. Actually, we would almost certainly have enough information for Perth weather, and as for Scottish houses: Worldcat shows, on the art and architecture aspect alone, both for great houses and the working classes  [http://www.worldcat.org/search?q=houses--scotland&fq=dt%3Abks+%3E+-fm%3Afic+%3E+s0%3A14000000&qt=facet_s0%3A 86 books]--let alone articles.  '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 15:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

16914 +++$+++ Melpul +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-31 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.301571960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Melpul|Melpul]] ([[User talk:Melpul|talk]]) 04:46, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
16915 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16914 +++$+++ 16914 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.301913480E09 +++$+++ btw, reallyhick, I think you've already said enough to make the point at the AfD.  ''' +++$+++ :btw, reallyhick, I think you've already said enough to make the point at the AfD.  '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 03:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
16916 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16914 +++$+++ 16915 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.301913600E09 +++$+++ So I would have thought, though I don't think the message is getting through. I think I've done all I can at this point. -  +++$+++ ::So I would have thought, though I don't think the message is getting through. I think I've done all I can at this point. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 03:40, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

541205 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-14 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.231923300E09 +++$+++ This redirect isn't working because the admin who locked the page slapped a template onto it, causing this link to become mundane. Can you fix this puzzling circumstance?  +++$+++ This redirect isn't working because the admin who locked the page slapped a template onto it, causing this link to become mundane. Can you fix this puzzling circumstance? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
541206 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541205 +++$+++ 541205 +++$+++ 2009-01-14 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.231924080E09 +++$+++ That did the trick. Much appreciated ;)  +++$+++ :That did the trick. Much appreciated ;) [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 01:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

279062 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-05-27 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.117226520E09 +++$+++ As per my reply to you on [[WP:FLC]], I'm seriously thinking of starting this next week. Any help you could give would be great. The Cantos list took me months.  +++$+++ As per my reply to you on [[WP:FLC]], I'm seriously thinking of starting this next week. Any help you could give would be great. The Cantos list took me months. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|Blarneyman]] 13:42, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
279063 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279062 +++$+++ 279062 +++$+++ 2005-05-27 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.117227360E09 +++$+++ I might try to help out. I've only got a copy of the ''Inferno''. And that's the only part I've read. It is a verse translation and introduction by Allen Mandelbaum (Bantam 1980). Plus I've no expertise at all in this or related fields. But I would suppose most of it will just be digging around. I'll see how it goes.  +++$+++ :I might try to help out. I've only got a copy of the ''Inferno''. And that's the only part I've read. It is a verse translation and introduction by Allen Mandelbaum (Bantam 1980). Plus I've no expertise at all in this or related fields. But I would suppose most of it will just be digging around. I'll see how it goes. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:56, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
279064 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279062 +++$+++ 279063 +++$+++ 2005-05-27 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.117227960E09 +++$+++ As I said, I have an ancient 3-volume bilingual pocket edition (Temple Classics published 1900 -  1905 and used by Joyce, Eliot, Yeats, Beckett and Pound) which has a goodish set of notes. With any luck, there'll be Wikipedia articles on a lot of the people, places and mythological figures involved to help with further information.  +++$+++ ::As I said, I have an ancient 3-volume bilingual pocket edition (Temple Classics published 1900 -  1905 and used by Joyce, Eliot, Yeats, Beckett and Pound) which has a goodish set of notes. With any luck, there'll be Wikipedia articles on a lot of the people, places and mythological figures involved to help with further information. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|Blarneyman]] 14:06, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
279065 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279062 +++$+++ 279064 +++$+++ 2005-05-31 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.117566000E09 +++$+++ I've made a very small start at [[User:Filiocht\/List of cultural references in The Divine Comedy]].  +++$+++ :::I've made a very small start at [[User:Filiocht/List of cultural references in The Divine Comedy]]. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|Blarneyman]] 12:00, May 31, 2005 (UTC)

541207 +++$+++ David Fuchs +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541207 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-15 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.232085000E09 +++$+++ I'm not the one that needs to drag you and Meowy to the table. The issue is not creating places, it's you doing it at such a rate that no one can revert you; I've said all this before. That's the issue that needs to be taken care of. --<font color=\"#cc6600\"> +++$+++ I'm not the one that needs to drag you and Meowy to the table. The issue is not creating places, it's you doing it at such a rate that no one can revert you; I've said all this before. That's the issue that needs to be taken care of. --<font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs]]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 21:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
541208 +++$+++ David Fuchs +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541207 +++$+++ 541207 +++$+++ 2009-01-15 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.232086860E09 +++$+++ No one should have to spend months digging through anyone's contributions. It's bizarre that it was brought up at AN months afterwards. But if there is a legitimate issue, you should be trying dispute resolution with Meowy, not me. Doing it, even when there is clear controversy, is [[WP:POINT|pointy]] and disruptive. <font color=\"#cc6600\"> +++$+++ :No one should have to spend months digging through anyone's contributions. It's bizarre that it was brought up at AN months afterwards. But if there is a legitimate issue, you should be trying dispute resolution with Meowy, not me. Doing it, even when there is clear controversy, is [[WP:POINT|pointy]] and disruptive. <font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs]]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 22:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
541209 +++$+++ David Fuchs +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541207 +++$+++ 541208 +++$+++ 2009-01-15 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.232087580E09 +++$+++ Because mediation is a waste of time. I'd rather be improving articles. <font color=\"#cc6600\"> +++$+++ ::Because mediation is a waste of time. I'd rather be improving articles. <font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs]]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 22:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
541210 +++$+++ David Fuchs +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541207 +++$+++ 541209 +++$+++ 2009-01-18 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.232283420E09 +++$+++ (Sorry, I didn't see your last message until I checked the history.) ...It seems I'm not making myself clear. The issue is not the creation of pages for places most people have never heard of (or at least, not to me; as I've said before, I've never encountered Meowy, he could be an amazing troll, that's not the point in this case). During the rather otherwise-pointless noticeboard report a number of others were concerned about the sort of bot-like actions you were taking with these articles, to the point that it would be very hard for one or even a couple of users to find them all and tag them; it's essentially laying the burden of \"proving this isn't a hoax\/is suitable for inclusion\" on others and disrupts the 'pedia. ''That{{'}}s'' the issue here. A far more useful way of proceeding would be either to sort out your baggage with Meowy, or start a thread on AN or wherever is an appropriate venue about your previous actions. --<font color=\"#cc6600\"> +++$+++ :::(Sorry, I didn't see your last message until I checked the history.) ...It seems I'm not making myself clear. The issue is not the creation of pages for places most people have never heard of (or at least, not to me; as I've said before, I've never encountered Meowy, he could be an amazing troll, that's not the point in this case). During the rather otherwise-pointless noticeboard report a number of others were concerned about the sort of bot-like actions you were taking with these articles, to the point that it would be very hard for one or even a couple of users to find them all and tag them; it's essentially laying the burden of "proving this isn't a hoax/is suitable for inclusion" on others and disrupts the 'pedia. ''That{{'}}s'' the issue here. A far more useful way of proceeding would be either to sort out your baggage with Meowy, or start a thread on AN or wherever is an appropriate venue about your previous actions. --<font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs]]</font><sup> <nowiki>(</nowiki><small><font color="#993300">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font></small><nowiki>)</nowiki></sup> 04:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

16920 +++$+++ Raw4815 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-06 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.302152580E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Raw4815|Raw4815]] ([[User talk:Raw4815|talk]]) 22:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
16921 +++$+++ Ttonyb1 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16920 +++$+++ 16920 +++$+++ 2011-04-06 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.302153360E09 +++$+++ Raw4815, given that you work for the collector's web developer and you have been tasked to create pages for the collection, by default you are working for the collector.  +++$+++ :Raw4815, given that you work for the collector's web developer and you have been tasked to create pages for the collection, by default you are working for the collector. [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 22:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
16922 +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16920 +++$+++ 16921 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.302171480E09 +++$+++ Tony is right. You have a business interest, even if it is indirect. Having said that, if you can find independent, reliable sources that verify what you write about the items, you may be OK, though the article would probably be edited by others to remove anything that might seem promotional. But you  will have to walk a fine line. Wikipedia takes a very dim view of anyone who uses WP for promotion of any kind. -  +++$+++ ::Tony is right. You have a business interest, even if it is indirect. Having said that, if you can find independent, reliable sources that verify what you write about the items, you may be OK, though the article would probably be edited by others to remove anything that might seem promotional. But you  will have to walk a fine line. Wikipedia takes a very dim view of anyone who uses WP for promotion of any kind. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 03:18, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

279066 +++$+++ Karmosin +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279066 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-05-27 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.117240800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Karmosin|Peter]] <sup>[[User talk:Karmosin|Isotalo]]</sup> 17:40, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
279067 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279066 +++$+++ 279066 +++$+++ 2005-05-27 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.117241640E09 +++$+++ Sorry Peter, I thought I ''was'' on the talk page. My mistake, of course my comment was misplaced there, I've removed it. I will bring it up on the talk page. Again sorry.  +++$+++ :Sorry Peter, I thought I ''was'' on the talk page. My mistake, of course my comment was misplaced there, I've removed it. I will bring it up on the talk page. Again sorry. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:54, May 27, 2005 (UTC)

279068 +++$+++ Fropuff +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279068 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-05-30 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.117512600E09 +++$+++ Paul, I was wondering if you might have time to do a Venn diagram for the [[disjoint union]] of two sets, similiar to your other ones (e.g. [[:Image:Venn A union B.png]]). I'd do it myself, but I'm not sure what tools you used; it would be better if we had a consistent look. Thanks. --  +++$+++ Paul, I was wondering if you might have time to do a Venn diagram for the [[disjoint union]] of two sets, similiar to your other ones (e.g. [[:Image:Venn A union B.png]]). I'd do it myself, but I'm not sure what tools you used; it would be better if we had a consistent look. Thanks. -- [[User:Fropuff|Fropuff]] 21:10, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
279069 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279068 +++$+++ 279068 +++$+++ 2005-05-31 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.117524240E09 +++$+++ Well I made those Venn diagrams in a kinda klugey way. I don't really have very good drawing tools available.  I'd be willing give it a try, but I can't visualize how to represent the (general) disjoint union with a Venn diagram. If you mean the union of say two disjoint sets, then of course two filled in non-intersecting circles would work. But for the general case of the disjoint union of say two possibly non-disjoint sets, then I don't see how to represent that. By the way thanks for your vote in support of my admin nomination.  +++$+++ :Well I made those Venn diagrams in a kinda klugey way. I don't really have very good drawing tools available.  I'd be willing give it a try, but I can't visualize how to represent the (general) disjoint union with a Venn diagram. If you mean the union of say two disjoint sets, then of course two filled in non-intersecting circles would work. But for the general case of the disjoint union of say two possibly non-disjoint sets, then I don't see how to represent that. By the way thanks for your vote in support of my admin nomination. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:24, May 31, 2005 (UTC)

541213 +++$+++ Dandv +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-11 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.242025620E09 +++$+++ Why did you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Faerie%27s_Aire_and_Death_Waltz&action=edit&redlink=1 delete the AFD itself] for '''Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz'''? -  +++$+++ Why did you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Faerie%27s_Aire_and_Death_Waltz&action=edit&redlink=1 delete the AFD itself] for '''Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz'''? - [[User:Dandv|Dandv]] ([[User talk:Dandv|talk]]) 00:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
541214 +++$+++ Firefoxman +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541213 +++$+++ 541213 +++$+++ 2009-05-11 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.242108840E09 +++$+++ The AFD wasn't deleted, it can be found at [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/John_Stump]]. ''' +++$+++ :The AFD wasn't deleted, it can be found at [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_Stump]]. '''[[User:Firefoxman|ff]]<font color="darkgreen">[[User talk:Firefoxman|m]]</font>''' 23:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

279071 +++$+++ Cecropia +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279071 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-05-31 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.117607580E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrator]]. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the [[Wikipedia:administrators' reading list|administrators' reading list]] before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the [[Main Page]]. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new [[Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide|administrators' how-to guide]] helpful. Cheers! --  +++$+++ Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrator]]. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the [[Wikipedia:administrators' reading list|administrators' reading list]] before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the [[Main Page]]. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new [[Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide|administrators' how-to guide]] helpful. Cheers! -- [[User:Cecropia|Cecropia]] | [[User talk:Cecropia|''explains it all'' ®]] 23:33, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
279072 +++$+++ Sjakkalle +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279071 +++$+++ 279071 +++$+++ 2005-06-01 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.117658700E09 +++$+++ Congratulations, and you're very welcome!  +++$+++ *Congratulations, and you're very welcome! [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] 13:45, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
279073 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279071 +++$+++ 279071 +++$+++ 2005-06-01 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.117678080E09 +++$+++ Same here.  +++$+++ *Same here. [[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">&Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf;</font>)]] 19:08, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
279074 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279071 +++$+++ 279071 +++$+++ 2005-06-02 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.117701360E09 +++$+++ And here too.  +++$+++ *And here too. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...<font color=green><small>''[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?''</small></font>]] 01:36, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
279075 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279071 +++$+++ 279071 +++$+++ 2005-06-02 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.117722000E09 +++$+++ Congratulations. A mastery of maths and an interest in Dante; I can just about manage the poetry and some basic adding and subtracting. Here's to an end of the two cultures approach to life.  +++$+++ *Congratulations. A mastery of maths and an interest in Dante; I can just about manage the poetry and some basic adding and subtracting. Here's to an end of the two cultures approach to life. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|Blarneyman]] 07:20, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
279076 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279071 +++$+++ 279075 +++$+++ 2005-06-02 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.117743960E09 +++$+++ Mathematics is just [[Mathematical beauty|another kind]] of poetry, [[The Two Cultures]] are really one.  +++$+++ ::Mathematics is just [[Mathematical beauty|another kind]] of poetry, [[The Two Cultures]] are really one. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:26, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
279077 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279071 +++$+++ 279076 +++$+++ 2005-06-02 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.117744500E09 +++$+++ I agree. In the words of [[Thomas Campion]], \"Poesy in all kind of speaking is the chiefe beginner, and maintayner of eloquence, not only helping the eare with the acquaintance of sweet numbers, but also raysing the minde to a more high and lofty conceite.\"  +++$+++ :::I agree. In the words of [[Thomas Campion]], "Poesy in all kind of speaking is the chiefe beginner, and maintayner of eloquence, not only helping the eare with the acquaintance of sweet numbers, but also raysing the minde to a more high and lofty conceite." [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|Blarneyman]] 13:35, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)

541216 +++$+++ Againme +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541216 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-20 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.232513040E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Againme|Againme]] ([[User talk:Againme|talk]]) 20:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
541217 +++$+++ Againme +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541216 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-01-20 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.232515500E09 +++$+++ Right on! Thanks for the explanation.-- +++$+++ ::Right on! Thanks for the explanation.--[[User:Againme|Againme]] ([[User talk:Againme|talk]]) 21:25, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

16931 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16931 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-19 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.305811320E09 +++$+++ Hello Realkyhick. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of [[:Patrick Bradley (disambiguation)]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Winning a Clio award is sufficient assertion of importance.'''  Thank you.  \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ Hello Realkyhick. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of [[:Patrick Bradley (disambiguation)]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Winning a Clio award is sufficient assertion of importance.'''  Thank you.  —&nbsp;[[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 06:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
16932 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Realkyhick +++$+++ 16931 +++$+++ 16931 +++$+++ 2011-05-19 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.305860280E09 +++$+++ Re: [[Patrick Bradley (entrepreneur)]]: According to [http:\/\/www.clioawards.com\/archive\/ the official site], Bradley was part of a team that won a Clio in 1998. (Click on Interactive and 1998, the product is Kenneth Cole.) I don't know whether being part of a winning team makes a person [[WP:N|notable]], merely that it is a sufficient assertion of importance to avoid speedy deletion. Try [[WP:PROD|PROD]]ding the article, or take it to [[WP:AfD|AfD]]. \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ :Re: [[Patrick Bradley (entrepreneur)]]: According to [http://www.clioawards.com/archive/ the official site], Bradley was part of a team that won a Clio in 1998. (Click on Interactive and 1998, the product is Kenneth Cole.) I don't know whether being part of a winning team makes a person [[WP:N|notable]], merely that it is a sufficient assertion of importance to avoid speedy deletion. Try [[WP:PROD|PROD]]ding the article, or take it to [[WP:AfD|AfD]]. —&nbsp;[[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 19:58, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

541221 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-27 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.233045780E09 +++$+++ I was going to block the account, but since it's not a blatant username violation, I'd rather wait to see if the account does any more editing. After that, I'll be able to make a decision. Cheers, &ndash; +++$+++ I was going to block the account, but since it's not a blatant username violation, I'd rather wait to see if the account does any more editing. After that, I'll be able to make a decision. Cheers, &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 00:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
541222 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541221 +++$+++ 541221 +++$+++ 2009-01-27 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.233046500E09 +++$+++ heh :) &ndash; +++$+++ :heh :) &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 00:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

279078 +++$+++ Csaribay +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279078 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-03 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.117790100E09 +++$+++ Many thanks for catching the little obscenity left by some fool on the [[iBook]] page. I'm currently working on it, would of probably missed it otherwise! -- +++$+++ Many thanks for catching the little obscenity left by some fool on the [[iBook]] page. I'm currently working on it, would of probably missed it otherwise! --[[User:Csaribay|Chris Saribay]] 02:15, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
279079 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279078 +++$+++ 279078 +++$+++ 2005-06-03 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.117794720E09 +++$+++ Your welcome.  +++$+++ :Your welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:32, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

16935 +++$+++ Nishonomics116 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311224880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Nishonomics116|Nishonomics116]] ([[User talk:Nishonomics116|talk]]) 22:08, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
16936 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16935 +++$+++ 16935 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311226200E09 +++$+++ Also the listing of numerous alleged awards and achievements without any references to prove it. . .  +++$+++ :Also the listing of numerous alleged awards and achievements without any references to prove it. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 22:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

279080 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279080 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-04 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.117880820E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. I noticed that you are considering making a list of categories of mathematicians. So I thought I would give you the list I have. It is a couple of months old, and it might not be of use to you, but it might avoid some duplicate work if you plan to do anything about that. See [[User:Oleg_Alexandrov\/Test_page]]. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Paul. I noticed that you are considering making a list of categories of mathematicians. So I thought I would give you the list I have. It is a couple of months old, and it might not be of use to you, but it might avoid some duplicate work if you plan to do anything about that. See [[User:Oleg_Alexandrov/Test_page]]. Cheers, [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] 03:27, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
279081 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279080 +++$+++ 279080 +++$+++ 2005-06-04 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.117884780E09 +++$+++ Thanks Oleg. I've copied over your file. I'm was just foolin around a bit. Trying to figure out the category scheme for mathematicians. Don't know what if anything will come of it.  +++$+++ :Thanks Oleg. I've copied over your file. I'm was just foolin around a bit. Trying to figure out the category scheme for mathematicians. Don't know what if anything will come of it. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:33, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

16937 +++$+++ 14.140.95.151 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16937 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311232440E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/14.140.95.151|14.140.95.151]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/14.140.95.151|14.140.95.151]] ([[User talk:14.140.95.151|talk]]) 00:14, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
16938 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16937 +++$+++ 16937 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 09:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311264840E09 +++$+++ The links to domestic subsidiaries have been removed per [[Wikipedia:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided]], points 13, 14 and 19. Corporate governance,mission and vision may come under [[WP:Peacock]]. . .  +++$+++ :The links to domestic subsidiaries have been removed per [[Wikipedia:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided]], points 13, 14 and 19. Corporate governance,mission and vision may come under [[WP:Peacock]]. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 09:14, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

279082 +++$+++ Nichalp +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-09 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.118355060E09 +++$+++ I've made sure that the bookmark links match and resorted the references. Has this taken care of your objection? &nbsp;<font color=\"#0082B8\">= +++$+++ I've made sure that the bookmark links match and resorted the references. Has this taken care of your objection? &nbsp;<font color="#0082B8">=[[user:Nichalp|Nichalp]] ([[User Talk:Nichalp|Talk]])=</font> 15:11, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
279083 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279082 +++$+++ 279082 +++$+++ 2005-06-09 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.118357340E09 +++$+++ I've responded on [[WP:FAC]].  +++$+++ :I've responded on [[WP:FAC]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:49, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

16940 +++$+++ Nishonomics116 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16940 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311957960E09 +++$+++ one more thing can you please talk on the article page please?  +++$+++ one more thing can you please talk on the article page please? [[User:Nishonomics116|Nishonomics116]] ([[User talk:Nishonomics116|talk]]) 09:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
16941 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16940 +++$+++ 16940 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.307389260E09 +++$+++ I've reinstated your changes as they were factual and not promotional. However some later changes by a related user made the article sound far too much like an advertisement, with claims like \"Our services meet business customers' increasing demand for a reliable, scalable and flexible communications platform\". . .  +++$+++ :I've reinstated your changes as they were factual and not promotional. However some later changes by a related user made the article sound far too much like an advertisement, with claims like "Our services meet business customers' increasing demand for a reliable, scalable and flexible communications platform". . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 12:41, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

could not match наталка зубар
16942 +++$+++ наталка зубар +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-17 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.303056600E09 +++$+++ What made you tag the page for my NGO [[Civic Methodics and Information Center \xabUniverse\xbb]] an advertisement? Everything written there can be substantiated. -- +++$+++ What made you tag the page for my NGO [[Civic Methodics and Information Center «Universe»]] an advertisement? Everything written there can be substantiated. --[[User:Наталка Зубар|Наталка Зубар]] ([[User talk:Наталка Зубар|talk]]) 09:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
16943 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16942 +++$+++ 16942 +++$+++ 2011-04-17 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.303082400E09 +++$+++ Basically, it's the repeated use of phrases like \"Our activity\", \"Our projects\" and \"We focus...\" throughout the article. . .  +++$+++ :Basically, it's the repeated use of phrases like "Our activity", "Our projects" and "We focus..." throughout the article. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 16:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

279087 +++$+++ ABCD +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-10 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.118451300E09 +++$+++ I actually found it by searching for [[Special:Search\/plainlinks|plainlinks]], adjusting some to use <code>plainlinksneverexpand<\/code>. &ndash;  +++$+++ I actually found it by searching for [[Special:Search/plainlinks|plainlinks]], adjusting some to use <code>plainlinksneverexpand</code>. &ndash; [[User:ABCD|AB]][[User talk:ABCD|'''''CD''''']] 17:55, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
279088 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279087 +++$+++ 279087 +++$+++ 2005-06-10 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.118451600E09 +++$+++ Ah I see. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Ah I see. Thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:00, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

16944 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16944 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Purpler0ckofficial PROF] 19:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Purpler0ckofficial PROF] 19:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
16945 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16944 +++$+++ 16944 +++$+++ 2011-05-24 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.306293000E09 +++$+++ My relief knows no bounds. . .  +++$+++ :My relief knows no bounds. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 20:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

279089 +++$+++ Revolver +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279089 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-13 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.118690820E09 +++$+++ I wrote this in the article [[category of topological spaces]]. I read it in an essay in ''Categorical Perspectives'', but it seems wrong, shouldn't it be a full reflective subcategory of Tych, all Tychonoff spaces??  +++$+++ I wrote this in the article [[category of topological spaces]]. I read it in an essay in ''Categorical Perspectives'', but it seems wrong, shouldn't it be a full reflective subcategory of Tych, all Tychonoff spaces?? [[User:Revolver|Revolver]] 12:27, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
279090 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279089 +++$+++ 279089 +++$+++ 2005-06-13 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.118704140E09 +++$+++ Yes I think you are correct. A space has a [[compactification (mathematics)|compactification]] iff it is Tychonoff.  +++$+++ :Yes I think you are correct. A space has a [[compactification (mathematics)|compactification]] iff it is Tychonoff. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:09, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
279091 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279089 +++$+++ 279089 +++$+++ 2005-06-19 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.119172740E09 +++$+++ Revolver, I've looked again at the question you asked about whether the \"category HComp of all compact Hausdorff spaces is a full reflective subcategory of Top; the Stone-&#268;ech compactifications serve as the reflections.\" As I said a top space needs to be Tychonoff to have a compactification. Nevertheless, HComp ''is'' a full reflective subcategory of Top, the reflections are just not the Stone-&#268;ech compactifications. As you said HComp is a full reflective subcategory of Tych. But Tych is a full reflective subcategory of Top. It follows that HComp is a full reflective subcategory of Top. If ''X'' is a top space, then its HComp-reflection, would be the Stone-&#268;ech compactifications of the Tych-reflection of ''X''. I hope this clears things up a bit.  +++$+++ :Revolver, I've looked again at the question you asked about whether the "category HComp of all compact Hausdorff spaces is a full reflective subcategory of Top; the Stone-&#268;ech compactifications serve as the reflections." As I said a top space needs to be Tychonoff to have a compactification. Nevertheless, HComp ''is'' a full reflective subcategory of Top, the reflections are just not the Stone-&#268;ech compactifications. As you said HComp is a full reflective subcategory of Tych. But Tych is a full reflective subcategory of Top. It follows that HComp is a full reflective subcategory of Top. If ''X'' is a top space, then its HComp-reflection, would be the Stone-&#268;ech compactifications of the Tych-reflection of ''X''. I hope this clears things up a bit. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:19, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
279092 +++$+++ Revolver +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279089 +++$+++ 279091 +++$+++ 2005-06-19 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.119214500E09 +++$+++ Yes, thanks for the clarification!  +++$+++ ::Yes, thanks for the clarification! [[User:Revolver|Revolver]] 13:55, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

16946 +++$+++ Craigtheskier +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16946 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-22 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.303523340E09 +++$+++ SmartSound Software Inc. is an American computer software and royalty free music company headquartered in Northridge, California, USA. The company is focused on providing royalty free music that can be quickly and easily created to a custom length using their patented software.   +++$+++ SmartSound Software Inc. is an American computer software and royalty free music company headquartered in Northridge, California, USA. The company is focused on providing royalty free music that can be quickly and easily created to a custom length using their patented software.  [[User:Craigtheskier|Craigtheskier]] ([[User talk:Craigtheskier|talk]]) 18:49, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
16947 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16946 +++$+++ 16946 +++$+++ 2011-04-22 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.303524600E09 +++$+++ I don't see any problem with that wording, though if you are working for the company you might want to read [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]]. Articles on companies are often deleted either because they read like an advertisement or because they fail to show why they are notable (see [[Wikipedia:Notability]]), so these are the main things to watch out for. . .  +++$+++ :I don't see any problem with that wording, though if you are working for the company you might want to read [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]]. Articles on companies are often deleted either because they read like an advertisement or because they fail to show why they are notable (see [[Wikipedia:Notability]]), so these are the main things to watch out for. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 19:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

16949 +++$+++ AlexandrDmitri +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-23 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.303597920E09 +++$+++ I've come across your tagging of spam pages in userspace and have 99.99% of the time deleted and blocked the offender. I am a little surprised, however, by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Smshoaib&curid=31573807&diff=425504190&oldid=425496384 this removal]. Regards -- +++$+++ I've come across your tagging of spam pages in userspace and have 99.99% of the time deleted and blocked the offender. I am a little surprised, however, by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Smshoaib&curid=31573807&diff=425504190&oldid=425496384 this removal]. Regards --[[User:AlexandrDmitri|Alexandr Dmitri]] ([[User talk:AlexandrDmitri|talk]]) 15:32, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
16950 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16949 +++$+++ 16949 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.303606740E09 +++$+++ Blatant self-promotion, as per my edit comments. . .  +++$+++ :Blatant self-promotion, as per my edit comments. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 17:59, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

279094 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279094 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-14 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.118801280E09 +++$+++ So, I wonder if you would agree with me that the thing needs to be moved back, and if yes, if you could do the move (since you have the admin powers). Thanks.  +++$+++ So, I wonder if you would agree with me that the thing needs to be moved back, and if yes, if you could do the move (since you have the admin powers). Thanks. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] 19:08, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
279095 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279094 +++$+++ 279094 +++$+++ 2005-06-14 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.118806200E09 +++$+++ Hi Oleg. I agree that [[gradient (calculus)]] should be moved back. But I'm not sure that [[Gradient]] qualifies as a [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedy delete]]. I have asked [[User:CryptoDerk|CryptoDerk]] for advice.  +++$+++ :Hi Oleg. I agree that [[gradient (calculus)]] should be moved back. But I'm not sure that [[Gradient]] qualifies as a [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedy delete]]. I have asked [[User:CryptoDerk|CryptoDerk]] for advice. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:30, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
279096 +++$+++ CryptoDerk +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279094 +++$+++ 279094 +++$+++ 2005-06-14 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.118806800E09 +++$+++ I'd say go ahead and move it back like it was.  Throw a line at the top of the gradient article stating that it also is used with respect to hills, etc.  For that person to move the gradient article to gradient (calculus) and then put a disambig page that isn't really a disambig page, all without discussing it, then on top of all that not fix the redirect is really stupid.   +++$+++ :I'd say go ahead and move it back like it was.  Throw a line at the top of the gradient article stating that it also is used with respect to hills, etc.  For that person to move the gradient article to gradient (calculus) and then put a disambig page that isn't really a disambig page, all without discussing it, then on top of all that not fix the redirect is really stupid.  [[User:CryptoDerk|CryptoDerk]] 20:40, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
279097 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279094 +++$+++ 279094 +++$+++ 2005-06-14 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.118808000E09 +++$+++ Ok I've moved [[gradient (calculus)]] back to [[gradient]]. Oleg you want to write something on the talk page about the move?  +++$+++ :Ok I've moved [[gradient (calculus)]] back to [[gradient]]. Oleg you want to write something on the talk page about the move? [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:00, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
279098 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279094 +++$+++ 279097 +++$+++ 2005-06-14 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.118818260E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. Thanks. I wrote something on [[Talk:gradient]] and made a [[gradient (disambiguation)]] page listing the two meanings. Would you mind putting [[gradient]] on your watchlist, in case there is further discussion on the subject? Thanks a lot.  +++$+++ :: Hi Paul. Thanks. I wrote something on [[Talk:gradient]] and made a [[gradient (disambiguation)]] page listing the two meanings. Would you mind putting [[gradient]] on your watchlist, in case there is further discussion on the subject? Thanks a lot. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] 23:51, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
279099 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279094 +++$+++ 279094 +++$+++ 2005-06-15 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.118819160E09 +++$+++ Glad to help. It's on my watch list.  +++$+++ :Glad to help. It's on my watch list. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:06, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

16951 +++$+++  Careful With That Axe, Eugene +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16951 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-27 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.303921860E09 +++$+++ Hello!  I would like to request that the <nowiki>{ad}<\/nowiki> tag is removed from the page for [[Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council]].  This is not a company producing a commercial product but rather is a non-Governmental body which manages funds administered by HM Treasury for the advancement of biosciences in the UK and beyond.  It is one of seven Research Councils in the UK, each with their own page, yet only the BBSRC page has tags on it.  There are no extraordinary claims made within the article and, although there is a regretful lack of proper citations, it is all verifiable from the BBSRC website.  The article does not appear to me to be adversely pushing an agenda.  Nevertheless, I have attempted to reduce the POV in the article.  Can you advise whether anything further requires editing to enable to removal of this tag?  Many thanks.   +++$+++ Hello!  I would like to request that the <nowiki>{ad}</nowiki> tag is removed from the page for [[Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council]].  This is not a company producing a commercial product but rather is a non-Governmental body which manages funds administered by HM Treasury for the advancement of biosciences in the UK and beyond.  It is one of seven Research Councils in the UK, each with their own page, yet only the BBSRC page has tags on it.  There are no extraordinary claims made within the article and, although there is a regretful lack of proper citations, it is all verifiable from the BBSRC website.  The article does not appear to me to be adversely pushing an agenda.  Nevertheless, I have attempted to reduce the POV in the article.  Can you advise whether anything further requires editing to enable to removal of this tag?  Many thanks.  [[user:Careful With That Axe, Eugene|<span style="color:purple">Careful</span> With That Axe, '''Eugene''']] [[user talk: Careful With That Axe, Eugene|<span style="color:green"><sup>Hello...</sup></span>]] 09:31, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
16952 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16951 +++$+++ 16951 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.303933620E09 +++$+++ It seems fine now; I've removed the advert tag, though the article could do with more references from independent sources, and the number of external links appears a little excessive. . .  +++$+++ :It seems fine now; I've removed the advert tag, though the article could do with more references from independent sources, and the number of external links appears a little excessive. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 12:47, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
16953 +++$+++  Careful With That Axe, Eugene +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16951 +++$+++ 16952 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.303943220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reassessment.  I agree it needs citations and will work on it if I get the chance...  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your reassessment.  I agree it needs citations and will work on it if I get the chance... [[user:Careful With That Axe, Eugene|<span style="color:purple">Careful</span> With That Axe, '''Eugene''']] [[user talk: Careful With That Axe, Eugene|<span style="color:green"><sup>Hello...</sup></span>]] 15:27, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

541241 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541241 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-03 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.233706080E09 +++$+++ Please refrain from deleting dab redirects which meet the requirements of [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Links to disambiguation pages]]. [[Corn (disambiguation)]] and [[Validity (disambiguation)]] are perfectly fine. Also, enough with the tedious task of making unnecessary edits to redirects in general (such as [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Return_of_the_Mack_(song)&diff=prev&oldid=268184517 here]) which don't seem to be helping anyone. If you're gonna reply, do so on your talk page (which I've watchlisted).  +++$+++ Please refrain from deleting dab redirects which meet the requirements of [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Links to disambiguation pages]]. [[Corn (disambiguation)]] and [[Validity (disambiguation)]] are perfectly fine. Also, enough with the tedious task of making unnecessary edits to redirects in general (such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Return_of_the_Mack_(song)&diff=prev&oldid=268184517 here]) which don't seem to be helping anyone. If you're gonna reply, do so on your talk page (which I've watchlisted). [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 16:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
541242 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541241 +++$+++ 541241 +++$+++ 2009-02-03 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.233713400E09 +++$+++ Apparently you aren't aware that there's a redirect bug that needs manual fixing. If you had read the posts above, or at [[WP:VPT]] you'd have learned that. Rather, you decide to make your uncivil post. If you cannot understand something, please ''ask'' rather than scream \"enough\" or \"unnecessary\" -- see [[Seagate, Brooklyn]] for an unfixed example to the problem. I will also leave you a civility warning on your talk page for your meanness.  +++$+++ *Apparently you aren't aware that there's a redirect bug that needs manual fixing. If you had read the posts above, or at [[WP:VPT]] you'd have learned that. Rather, you decide to make your uncivil post. If you cannot understand something, please ''ask'' rather than scream "enough" or "unnecessary" -- see [[Seagate, Brooklyn]] for an unfixed example to the problem. I will also leave you a civility warning on your talk page for your meanness. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] ([[User talk:Carlossuarez46#top|talk]]) 18:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
541243 +++$+++ Dicklyon +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541241 +++$+++ 541241 +++$+++ 2009-02-03 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.233722880E09 +++$+++ I tried asking, but you didn't answer, and left you unhelpful incivil reply on my talk page instead of above.  If you had left an actual answer, someone else could have read it.  But as I said, you should stop anyway, and see if the bug can be fixed instead of you tweaking hundreds of redirects into a nonstandard state.   +++$+++ :I tried asking, but you didn't answer, and left you unhelpful incivil reply on my talk page instead of above.  If you had left an actual answer, someone else could have read it.  But as I said, you should stop anyway, and see if the bug can be fixed instead of you tweaking hundreds of redirects into a nonstandard state.  [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 20:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

16955 +++$+++ Lntccdpr +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-10 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.305040020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Lntccdpr|Lntccdpr]] ([[User talk:Lntccdpr|talk]]) 08:07, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
16956 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16955 +++$+++ 16955 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.305040680E09 +++$+++ It's not my job to officially approve changes, I merely removed material that was intended to advertise the company (and excessive external links to a company webpage also fall into this category). Feel free to make any changes yourself, bearing in mind [[WP:Spam]]. . .  +++$+++ :It's not my job to officially approve changes, I merely removed material that was intended to advertise the company (and excessive external links to a company webpage also fall into this category). Feel free to make any changes yourself, bearing in mind [[WP:Spam]]. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 08:18, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
16957 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16955 +++$+++ 16955 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.305220140E09 +++$+++ It is improved, but still seems rather promotional in tone, not necessarily of the film itself, but of the therapies covered. . .  +++$+++ :It is improved, but still seems rather promotional in tone, not necessarily of the film itself, but of the therapies covered. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 10:09, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
16958 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16955 +++$+++ 16955 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.305659220E09 +++$+++ Sorry, it still reads more like a promotional review than an unbiased factual article about the film. . .  +++$+++ :Sorry, it still reads more like a promotional review than an unbiased factual article about the film. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 12:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

279100 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-16 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.118959500E09 +++$+++ ;Thanks for fixing my stupid Plato\/Ari mix up.  +++$+++ ;Thanks for fixing my stupid Plato/Ari mix up. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|Blarneyman]] 15:05, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
279101 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279100 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-06-16 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.118960100E09 +++$+++ Your welcome, (as long as you find and fix all ''my'' stupid mistakes, see [[Talk:List of cultural references in The Divine Comedy#Consistent line numbers]])  +++$+++ ::Your welcome, (as long as you find and fix all ''my'' stupid mistakes, see [[Talk:List of cultural references in The Divine Comedy#Consistent line numbers]]) [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:15, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
279102 +++$+++ TheoClarke +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279100 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-06-17 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.119067140E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul:  My line numbers must remain unknown until I find or receive an appropriate edition of the meisterwerk.  I am working from Cary's translation&mdash;coincidentally, this being the only volume of The Harvard Classics not boxed in the store room that holds most of my books. A comparison with [http:\/\/www.sacred-texts.com\/chr\/dante\/divinaco.htm an online Italian text] suggests that Cary respected the line structure of the original but I cannot be sure and I would prefer to wait until I have a parallel text. And, while I am here, thank you for supporting my RFA&mdash;lax line citation being no impediment, it seems.&mdash; +++$+++ :::Hi Paul:  My line numbers must remain unknown until I find or receive an appropriate edition of the meisterwerk.  I am working from Cary's translation&mdash;coincidentally, this being the only volume of The Harvard Classics not boxed in the store room that holds most of my books. A comparison with [http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/dante/divinaco.htm an online Italian text] suggests that Cary respected the line structure of the original but I cannot be sure and I would prefer to wait until I have a parallel text. And, while I am here, thank you for supporting my RFA&mdash;lax line citation being no impediment, it seems.&mdash;[[User:TheoClarke|Theo ]] [[User_talk:TheoClarke|(Talk)]] 20:59, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
279103 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279100 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-06-17 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.119069480E09 +++$+++ No problem, Theo. When I get my copy of ''Purgitorio'' I will try to add them.  And your welcome, I'm sure you'll wear adminship with style ;-)  +++$+++ ::::No problem, Theo. When I get my copy of ''Purgitorio'' I will try to add them.  And your welcome, I'm sure you'll wear adminship with style ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:38, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

527114 +++$+++ Obaidz96 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527114 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-26 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.225017060E09 +++$+++ Do You have any sources that support that Andrea White was working for the Law firm Locke Liddell? <sup>(Please Respond on my talk page.)<\/sup>--<span id=\"Obaidz96\" class=\"plainlinks\" > +++$+++ Do You have any sources that support that Andrea White was working for the Law firm Locke Liddell? <sup>(Please Respond on my talk page.)</sup>--<span id="Obaidz96" class="plainlinks" >[[User:Obaidz96|Obaidz96]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Obaidz96|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Obaidz96|contribs]] <small>•</small> [http://toolserver.org/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username={{urlencode:Obaidz96}}&site={{SERVERNAME}} <span style="color:#002bb8">count</span>]</span>) 03:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
527115 +++$+++ Obaidz96 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527114 +++$+++ 527114 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.225024140E09 +++$+++ Thank You Greatly --<span id=\"Obaidz96\" class=\"plainlinks\" > +++$+++ :Thank You Greatly --<span id="Obaidz96" class="plainlinks" >[[User:Obaidz96|Obaidz96]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Obaidz96|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Obaidz96|contribs]] <small>•</small> [http://toolserver.org/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username={{urlencode:Obaidz96}}&site={{SERVERNAME}} <span style="color:#002bb8">count</span>]</span>) 05:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

16959 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ NOW waterboy 04:38, 13 May 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ NOW waterboy 04:38, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
16960 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16959 +++$+++ 16959 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.305297120E09 +++$+++ I don't understand the question. . .  +++$+++ :I don't understand the question. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 07:32, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
16961 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16959 +++$+++ 16959 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.305659640E09 +++$+++ I still don't understand. I suggest you begin familiarising yourself with Wikipedia generally by editing various articles and trying out its functions, rather than immediately trying to create a new article about a subject with which you appear to have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. . .  +++$+++ :I still don't understand. I suggest you begin familiarising yourself with Wikipedia generally by editing various articles and trying out its functions, rather than immediately trying to create a new article about a subject with which you appear to have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 12:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

279105 +++$+++ Zora +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-26 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.119801780E09 +++$+++ Paul, I think it would be a good idea to check into the talk page of [[Islam]] and explain what you're doing. This is one of the most-edited, most vandalized articles in Wikipedia, and people tend to react very strongly to unilateral changes. I don't see anything wrong with anything you've done so far -- in fact, I just put in a whole bunch of my OWN changes, which went a bit further -- but communicating would make good Wiki-political sense.  +++$+++ Paul, I think it would be a good idea to check into the talk page of [[Islam]] and explain what you're doing. This is one of the most-edited, most vandalized articles in Wikipedia, and people tend to react very strongly to unilateral changes. I don't see anything wrong with anything you've done so far -- in fact, I just put in a whole bunch of my OWN changes, which went a bit further -- but communicating would make good Wiki-political sense. [[User:Zora|Zora]] 09:03, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
279106 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279105 +++$+++ 279105 +++$+++ 2005-06-26 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.119819540E09 +++$+++ Thanks Zora, I've replied on the [[Talk:Islam|Islam talk page]].  +++$+++ :Thanks Zora, I've replied on the [[Talk:Islam|Islam talk page]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:59, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
279107 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279105 +++$+++ 279105 +++$+++ 2005-06-29 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.120100040E09 +++$+++ Hi Dan. Is the page [[Wikipedia:Brilliant prose\/temp]] still needed\/useful?  +++$+++ :Hi Dan. Is the page [[Wikipedia:Brilliant prose/temp]] still needed/useful? [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] June 29, 2005 19:54 (UTC)

541250 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-10 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.234302300E09 +++$+++ Please unprotect {{Tl|UF-hcard-geo}}. None of its sister-templates (e.g. {{Tl|UF-hcard-name}}, {{Tl|UF-hcard-person}}) are protected, and I often have cause to change them.  +++$+++ Please unprotect {{Tl|UF-hcard-geo}}. None of its sister-templates (e.g. {{Tl|UF-hcard-name}}, {{Tl|UF-hcard-person}}) are protected, and I often have cause to change them. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] (User:Pigsonthewing); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Andy's talk]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]] 13:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
541251 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541250 +++$+++ 541250 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.234318080E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ :Done. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] ([[User talk:Carlossuarez46|talk]]) 18:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
541252 +++$+++ Pigsonthewing +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541250 +++$+++ 541251 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.234318620E09 +++$+++ Many thanks.  +++$+++ ::Many thanks. [[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]] (User:Pigsonthewing); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Andy's talk]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]] 18:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

16963 +++$+++ SynEx +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16963 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-30 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.306741020E09 +++$+++ Hello. I see that on 16th May you removed reference to the [[Clear Skies]] machinima series from the disambiguation page, with the comment 'external link removal'. I wasn't aware that there was a policy preventing external links on disambiguation pages, but if that is the case would you have any objection to me restoring the rest of the text without the external link? In 2008 it was given Machinima Filmfest 2008's Mackie award for Best Long Format film and has thousands of viewers so I'd certainly say it's notable.  +++$+++ Hello. I see that on 16th May you removed reference to the [[Clear Skies]] machinima series from the disambiguation page, with the comment 'external link removal'. I wasn't aware that there was a policy preventing external links on disambiguation pages, but if that is the case would you have any objection to me restoring the rest of the text without the external link? In 2008 it was given Machinima Filmfest 2008's Mackie award for Best Long Format film and has thousands of viewers so I'd certainly say it's notable. [[User:SynEx|SynEx]] ([[User talk:SynEx|talk]]) 00:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
16964 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16963 +++$+++ 16963 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.306775340E09 +++$+++ If it is not notable enough to have a separate Wikipedia article written about it, then it should not be referred to on a disambiguation page. . .  +++$+++ :If it is not notable enough to have a separate Wikipedia article written about it, then it should not be referred to on a disambiguation page. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 10:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
16965 +++$+++ Peterl +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16963 +++$+++ 16964 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.306776180E09 +++$+++ Yes, there are issues with that disambig page, and the external ref doesn't belong there (according to [[MOS:DABENTRIES]]. But the topic has prima facie notability. Just needs some refs for what SynEx has stated to become a full page.  +++$+++ ::Yes, there are issues with that disambig page, and the external ref doesn't belong there (according to [[MOS:DABENTRIES]]. But the topic has prima facie notability. Just needs some refs for what SynEx has stated to become a full page. [[User:Peterl|peterl]] ([[User talk:Peterl|talk]]) 10:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
16966 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16963 +++$+++ 16965 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.306776840E09 +++$+++ I don't have any hard and fast rules on whether to remove red links; I may leave them in if it seems likely that an article may be written about them, but not if they appear trivial or promotional. The Clear Skies machinima entry doesn't immediately appear that notable as it is not mentioned in the Wikipedia articles on either [[machinima]] or [[EVE Online]]. If a separate article is going to be written about it then that's fine. . .  +++$+++ :::I don't have any hard and fast rules on whether to remove red links; I may leave them in if it seems likely that an article may be written about them, but not if they appear trivial or promotional. The Clear Skies machinima entry doesn't immediately appear that notable as it is not mentioned in the Wikipedia articles on either [[machinima]] or [[EVE Online]]. If a separate article is going to be written about it then that's fine. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 10:34, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

279110 +++$+++ MarSch +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279110 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-01 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.120281240E09 +++$+++ there seem to be a lot of requests with very few google hits. I started removeing some of them, but this may not have been such a good idea. Any thoughts? -- +++$+++ there seem to be a lot of requests with very few google hits. I started removeing some of them, but this may not have been such a good idea. Any thoughts? --[[User:MarSch|MarSch]] 1 July 2005 22:14 (UTC)
279111 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279110 +++$+++ 279110 +++$+++ 2005-07-01 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.120281600E09 +++$+++ Well I guess I'd be inclined to just leave them. Somebody thought they were important, and Google isn't all that reliable as a measure of notability, and besides they do little harm there. I would just remove those which have articles.  +++$+++ :Well I guess I'd be inclined to just leave them. Somebody thought they were important, and Google isn't all that reliable as a measure of notability, and besides they do little harm there. I would just remove those which have articles. [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] July 1, 2005 22:20 (UTC)

16967 +++$+++ Peterl +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16967 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-30 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.306742100E09 +++$+++ Thanks  +++$+++ Thanks [[User:Peterl|peterl]] ([[User talk:Peterl|talk]]) 00:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
16968 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16967 +++$+++ 16967 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 10:17:00 +++$+++ 1.306775820E09 +++$+++ I don't mind if the Financial Management and Accountability Act link is reinstated; it at least shows someone thinks it is important enough and may prompt someone to write an article about it. Flight Management Annunciator is not mentioned in any of the articles about Airbus aircraft, so it seems pointless to refer to it in a disambiguation page. . .  +++$+++ :I don't mind if the Financial Management and Accountability Act link is reinstated; it at least shows someone thinks it is important enough and may prompt someone to write an article about it. Flight Management Annunciator is not mentioned in any of the articles about Airbus aircraft, so it seems pointless to refer to it in a disambiguation page. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 10:17, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

279112 +++$+++ Dcljr +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Are you aware that your sig contains an extraneous space after your name in the link to your user page? (<tt><nowiki>...August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk...<\/nowiki><\/tt>) -  +++$+++ Are you aware that your sig contains an extraneous space after your name in the link to your user page? (<tt><nowiki>...August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk...</nowiki></tt>) - [[User:Dcljr|dcljr]] <small>([[User talk:Dcljr|talk]])</small> 2 July 2005 01:20 (UTC)
279113 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279112 +++$+++ 279112 +++$+++ 2005-07-02 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.120297560E09 +++$+++ I had just noticed this myself recently. I've changed it now.  +++$+++ :I had just noticed this myself recently. I've changed it now. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] July 2, 2005 02:46 (UTC)

16969 +++$+++ Gobonobo +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-30 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.306745100E09 +++$+++ Hi Mean as custard. I wanted to let you know that you were mentioned in an [http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/local\/education\/wikipedia-goes-to-class\/2011\/05\/03\/AGNF4NEH_story.html article] in the ''Washington Post''. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Mean as custard. I wanted to let you know that you were mentioned in an [http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/wikipedia-goes-to-class/2011/05/03/AGNF4NEH_story.html article] in the ''Washington Post''. Cheers, [[User:Gobonobo|<font face="Verdana" color="333300">Gobonobo</font>]] [[User_talk:Gobonobo|<sup>T</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Gobonobo|<sup>C</sup>]] 01:45, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
16970 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16969 +++$+++ 16969 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 08:13:00 +++$+++ 1.306768380E09 +++$+++ Wow, fame at last! Thanks. . .  +++$+++ :Wow, fame at last! Thanks. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 08:13, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
16971 +++$+++ Sj +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16969 +++$+++ 16970 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.306772580E09 +++$+++ On the front page of today's print edition, no less!  <span style=\"padding:2px;background-color:white;color:#666;\">&ndash;&nbsp; +++$+++ :: On the front page of today's print edition, no less!  <span style="padding:2px;background-color:white;color:#666;">&ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Sj|SJ]][[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">&nbsp;+</font>]]</span> 09:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
16972 +++$+++ Shirt58 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16969 +++$+++ 16971 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.306776540E09 +++$+++ Hi Mean as custard. I hope to be the first to congratulate you on your newly-found fame as interface between Wikipedia and Academia... d'oh! -- +++$+++ :::Hi Mean as custard. I hope to be the first to congratulate you on your newly-found fame as interface between Wikipedia and Academia... d'oh! --[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 10:29, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
16973 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16969 +++$+++ 16972 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.307132040E09 +++$+++ Very cool. The entire article is a good read, and should be widely circulated. And congrats on making sure sure the material meets high standards.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::::Very cool. The entire article is a good read, and should be widely circulated. And congrats on making sure sure the material meets high standards.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 13:14, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

279114 +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279114 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-13 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.121272620E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. You are doing great work at [[List of mathematical functions]]. However, I am surprised to see things like ''injective function'' and ''additive function'' appearing there. To me, they seem more like properties of functions than functions themselves. Listing them also seems at odds with the introduction of the article (though we can of course always change the introduction). I am reluctant to remove them and destroy your hard work, but perhaps you could give it a thought? I think that at the least, they should be listed in a separate section. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Paul. You are doing great work at [[List of mathematical functions]]. However, I am surprised to see things like ''injective function'' and ''additive function'' appearing there. To me, they seem more like properties of functions than functions themselves. Listing them also seems at odds with the introduction of the article (though we can of course always change the introduction). I am reluctant to remove them and destroy your hard work, but perhaps you could give it a thought? I think that at the least, they should be listed in a separate section. Cheers, [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] ([[User talk:Jitse Niesen|talk]]) 09:37, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
279115 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279114 +++$+++ 279114 +++$+++ 2005-07-13 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.121285820E09 +++$+++ Hi Jitse. As I added these functions, I have considered this question, although, the more I think about it, the more I think that the \"distinction\" between these \"functions\" and the others is hard to make clearly. Most of the entries in this list represent classes of functions, and so could be considered a property rather than a function. If we were to move these entries into a separate section, I'd be interested to know what you think we should call it, and which entries would you move there? In any case, these \"functions\" belong somewhere, in this list &mdash; or perhaps some other list. Feel free to move these to whatever section you like. I'd be very interested in your (and others) thoughts as to how best to organize this list. As I'm not sure yet about this, for now I'm going to concentrate on adding things, and worry about organization later.  +++$+++ :Hi Jitse. As I added these functions, I have considered this question, although, the more I think about it, the more I think that the "distinction" between these "functions" and the others is hard to make clearly. Most of the entries in this list represent classes of functions, and so could be considered a property rather than a function. If we were to move these entries into a separate section, I'd be interested to know what you think we should call it, and which entries would you move there? In any case, these "functions" belong somewhere, in this list &mdash; or perhaps some other list. Feel free to move these to whatever section you like. I'd be very interested in your (and others) thoughts as to how best to organize this list. As I'm not sure yet about this, for now I'm going to concentrate on adding things, and worry about organization later. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:17, July 13, 2005 (UTC)

279117 +++$+++ RobertG +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-13 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.121297760E09 +++$+++ Hello.  Don't get me wrong, I find [[Johann Sebastian Bach]] to be among the most significant, intellectually stimulating and influential too.  But what does \"great\" mean, exactly, in that first sentence?  If it means what I've just said in my previous sentence, then the article already says that - it's the next sentence!  If it has other meanings, let's add them.  Also, I really do think \"of all time\" is redundant.  Please would you look at a discussion over at the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers#Greatness|composers project]]?  Best.  -- +++$+++ Hello.  Don't get me wrong, I find [[Johann Sebastian Bach]] to be among the most significant, intellectually stimulating and influential too.  But what does "great" mean, exactly, in that first sentence?  If it means what I've just said in my previous sentence, then the article already says that - it's the next sentence!  If it has other meanings, let's add them.  Also, I really do think "of all time" is redundant.  Please would you look at a discussion over at the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers#Greatness|composers project]]?  Best.  --[[User:RobertG|RobertG]] &#9836; [[User talk:RobertG|talk]] 16:36, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
279118 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279117 +++$+++ 279117 +++$+++ 2005-07-13 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.121299920E09 +++$+++ Hi Robert. \"One of the greatest\" (the article doesn't use the word \"great\") is an abbreviation (more or less) for \"one of the two or three (or four? or five?) most significant, intellectually stimulating, influential, popular and enjoyed\". And the next sentence: \"His works, noted for their intellectual depth, technical command, and artistic beauty, have provided inspiration to nearly every composer in the European tradition, from Mozart to Schoenberg\", doesn't say that &mdash; it is a much weaker statement. We could say something like that explicitly, but at the cost of brevity and conciseness and besides, everyone ''knows'' what \"one of the greatest\" means. They and everyone else use the expression all the time. Saying he was the \"one of the greatest\" represents an attempt at ranking, in this case, composers. While our modern bias is that such attempts are somewhat dubious, this is nevertheless, something that people (scholars as well as everyday folk) have continually done. And there is considerable consensus as to which composers rank highest: Bach, Beethoven and Mozart (among perhaps a couple of others). Such statements are ubiquitous. Our article should reflect that, just like Briatannica, which uses almost the exact phrase we do.  +++$+++ :Hi Robert. "One of the greatest" (the article doesn't use the word "great") is an abbreviation (more or less) for "one of the two or three (or four? or five?) most significant, intellectually stimulating, influential, popular and enjoyed". And the next sentence: "His works, noted for their intellectual depth, technical command, and artistic beauty, have provided inspiration to nearly every composer in the European tradition, from Mozart to Schoenberg", doesn't say that &mdash; it is a much weaker statement. We could say something like that explicitly, but at the cost of brevity and conciseness and besides, everyone ''knows'' what "one of the greatest" means. They and everyone else use the expression all the time. Saying he was the "one of the greatest" represents an attempt at ranking, in this case, composers. While our modern bias is that such attempts are somewhat dubious, this is nevertheless, something that people (scholars as well as everyday folk) have continually done. And there is considerable consensus as to which composers rank highest: Bach, Beethoven and Mozart (among perhaps a couple of others). Such statements are ubiquitous. Our article should reflect that, just like Briatannica, which uses almost the exact phrase we do. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:12, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
279119 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279117 +++$+++ 279117 +++$+++ 2005-07-13 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.121300640E09 +++$+++ By the way, yes I suppose technically \"of all time\" is redundant. But stylistically, it or something like it (e.g. \"who ever lived\") is required.  When reading \"one of the greatest ...\" one expects a qualification (e.g. \"of the nineteenth century\").  +++$+++ :By the way, yes I suppose technically "of all time" is redundant. But stylistically, it or something like it (e.g. "who ever lived") is required.  When reading "one of the greatest ..." one expects a qualification (e.g. "of the nineteenth century"). [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:24, July 13, 2005 (UTC)

16974 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-03 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.307131800E09 +++$+++ The page [[User:Saeedtent]] looks like it may be a valid CSD, but I prefer not to delete a page unless the creator has been notified. I understand that sometimes automated tools fail to do the notification for some reason. Not sure if that was the case, but could you make the notification?<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ The page [[User:Saeedtent]] looks like it may be a valid CSD, but I prefer not to delete a page unless the creator has been notified. I understand that sometimes automated tools fail to do the notification for some reason. Not sure if that was the case, but could you make the notification?<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 13:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
16975 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16974 +++$+++ 16974 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.307135400E09 +++$+++ Same for [[User:Lakshya Sports]]. I note that in both cases, the user tried to start an article on their user page. Not sure if that is relevant.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ :Same for [[User:Lakshya Sports]]. I note that in both cases, the user tried to start an article on their user page. Not sure if that is relevant.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 14:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
16976 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16974 +++$+++ 16974 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.307988060E09 +++$+++ I suggest you begin learning about Wikipedia by writing about things with which you do not have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. If your company is considered [[WP:Notability|notable]] then sooner or later a neutral editor will write an article about it. . .  +++$+++ :I suggest you begin learning about Wikipedia by writing about things with which you do not have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. If your company is considered [[WP:Notability|notable]] then sooner or later a neutral editor will write an article about it. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 11:01, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

279120 +++$+++ RobertG +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279120 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-14 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.121347200E09 +++$+++ I agree that there should be some indication of Bach's significance stronger than that second sentence, as it is encyclopedic.  I'm still not happy with the word \"greatest\", because it's vague - and as you say it's an abbreviation, I'd really much rather include a modification of your expansion of the abbreviation above (I may try one day when I've more time).  I don't accept that \"everyone knows what it means\" - \"greatest\" means different things to different people, and there's too much of the [[Wikipedia:Avoid weasel terms#Peacock terms|peacock]] and the \"top ten\" about it.  And Britannica doing something is by itself no reason for Wikipedia to follow suit.  For now I modified the page according to [[Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Characterizing opinions of people's work|this bit of NPOV policy]].  Hope it's acceptable.  -- +++$+++ I agree that there should be some indication of Bach's significance stronger than that second sentence, as it is encyclopedic.  I'm still not happy with the word "greatest", because it's vague - and as you say it's an abbreviation, I'd really much rather include a modification of your expansion of the abbreviation above (I may try one day when I've more time).  I don't accept that "everyone knows what it means" - "greatest" means different things to different people, and there's too much of the [[Wikipedia:Avoid weasel terms#Peacock terms|peacock]] and the "top ten" about it.  And Britannica doing something is by itself no reason for Wikipedia to follow suit.  For now I modified the page according to [[Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Characterizing opinions of people's work|this bit of NPOV policy]].  Hope it's acceptable.  --[[User:RobertG|RobertG]] &#9836; [[User talk:RobertG|talk]] 06:20, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
279121 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279120 +++$+++ 279120 +++$+++ 2005-07-14 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.121376120E09 +++$+++ I like your modification, and I especially like that you were able to find a reasonable source. Yes \"greatest\" does mean (slightly) different things to different people, but in this case, that is part of its virtue. Nearly everyone agrees that \"Bach was one of the greatest\" but they won't all agree on ''why''. Trying to replace it with some more precise statement will lead to problems. Sometimes (like in diplomacy) a bit of ambiguity is a good thing. And yes it doesn't behoove us to blindly follow Britannica, but of course we should pay close attention to what they do, they are ''still'' the gold standard. (I'm going to copy this discussion to [[Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach]] and point to it in the discussion going on at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers#Greatness|composers project]])  +++$+++ :I like your modification, and I especially like that you were able to find a reasonable source. Yes "greatest" does mean (slightly) different things to different people, but in this case, that is part of its virtue. Nearly everyone agrees that "Bach was one of the greatest" but they won't all agree on ''why''. Trying to replace it with some more precise statement will lead to problems. Sometimes (like in diplomacy) a bit of ambiguity is a good thing. And yes it doesn't behoove us to blindly follow Britannica, but of course we should pay close attention to what they do, they are ''still'' the gold standard. (I'm going to copy this discussion to [[Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach]] and point to it in the discussion going on at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers#Greatness|composers project]]) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:22, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
279122 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279120 +++$+++ 279120 +++$+++ 2005-07-14 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.121395500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:45, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

46520 +++$+++ SimonP +++$+++ Uucp +++$+++ 46520 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-05 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.118026800E09 +++$+++ Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Good work on the [[Armand Hammer United World College of the American West]] article. I'm just wondering where you got the photos. Did you take them yourself? If you did you should note that on the page of the image and also mention which [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|image license]] it is released under. If you did not take them yourself you need to get permission from whoever did before they can be used on Wikipedia. -  +++$+++ Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Good work on the [[Armand Hammer United World College of the American West]] article. I'm just wondering where you got the photos. Did you take them yourself? If you did you should note that on the page of the image and also mention which [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|image license]] it is released under. If you did not take them yourself you need to get permission from whoever did before they can be used on Wikipedia. - [[User:SimonP|SimonP]] 20:00, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
46521 +++$+++ SimonP +++$+++ Uucp +++$+++ 46520 +++$+++ 46520 +++$+++ 2005-06-06 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.118093880E09 +++$+++ cc-by-2.0 is perfect. Thanks. -  +++$+++ :cc-by-2.0 is perfect. Thanks. - [[User:SimonP|SimonP]] 14:38, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

16978 +++$+++ Alexf +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16978 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-21 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.308703200E09 +++$+++ It is good you have been cleaning up adverts from user pages for a while but it would be better if you added user warnings in their talk page so they understand why the spammy text was removed. You could use something like [[:Template:Uw-advert2]] for the purpose. Cheers! --  +++$+++ It is good you have been cleaning up adverts from user pages for a while but it would be better if you added user warnings in their talk page so they understand why the spammy text was removed. You could use something like [[:Template:Uw-advert2]] for the purpose. Cheers! -- [[User:Alexf|Alexf]]<sup><i>[[User talk:Alexf|(talk)]]</i></sup> 17:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
16979 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16978 +++$+++ 16978 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.308837840E09 +++$+++ Blatant advertiing. . .  +++$+++ :Blatant advertiing. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 07:04, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

279123 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279123 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-20 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.121886900E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to thank you for all the corrections you made to the articles on which I've worked; I'm sorry I keep doing a lot of errors, but I'm trying to improve :-) And if you ever think that my prose's horrible, don't take problems in mending it; English is only my second language. Bye!  +++$+++ I just wanted to thank you for all the corrections you made to the articles on which I've worked; I'm sorry I keep doing a lot of errors, but I'm trying to improve :-) And if you ever think that my prose's horrible, don't take problems in mending it; English is only my second language. Bye! [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 12:15, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
279124 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279123 +++$+++ 279123 +++$+++ 2005-07-20 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.121912220E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. I don't mind at all trying to help a bit with the great contributions you are making. And you do seem to be picking up things quickly. Keep up the good work!  +++$+++ :You are very welcome. I don't mind at all trying to help a bit with the great contributions you are making. And you do seem to be picking up things quickly. Keep up the good work! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:17, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
279125 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279123 +++$+++ 279123 +++$+++ 2005-07-20 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.121855700E09 +++$+++ Regards. (By the way you can sign and timestamp your posts, by typing four tildes i.e. \"<nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>\".) &mdash;  +++$+++ :Regards. (By the way you can sign and timestamp your posts, by typing four tildes i.e. "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>".) &mdash; [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:35, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

16980 +++$+++ Epistemological Stasis +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-24 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.308974460E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Epistemological Stasis|Epistemological Stasis]] ([[User talk:Epistemological Stasis|talk]]) 21:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
16981 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16980 +++$+++ 16980 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.308975420E09 +++$+++ It's a fair cop, I admit it, my user name is a fake. What was it that gave the game away ? . . . I have never tried to analyse people's motivations in writing what they do, my responses are based entirely on the content of what is written, and whether in my judgement it is acceptable according to Wikipedia standards. End of discussion.  +++$+++ :It's a fair cop, I admit it, my user name is a fake. What was it that gave the game away ? . . . I have never tried to analyse people's motivations in writing what they do, my responses are based entirely on the content of what is written, and whether in my judgement it is acceptable according to Wikipedia standards. End of discussion. [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

16982 +++$+++ Cindamuse +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-29 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.309336860E09 +++$+++ Hey there Custard, you recently placed a <nowiki>{{buzzword|section}}<\/nowiki> cleanup template on the above referenced article. The template states that the specific concerns are on the talk page, while no concerns can be found there. Without more information, I am inclined to remove the template, but wanted to contact you first. I have a business background and understand the terms used, but realize that not everybody shares the same knowledge. Could you please share your concerns for other editors to fully address? Thanks, <b><font color=\"navy\" face=\"Tahoma\"> +++$+++ Hey there Custard, you recently placed a <nowiki>{{buzzword|section}}</nowiki> cleanup template on the above referenced article. The template states that the specific concerns are on the talk page, while no concerns can be found there. Without more information, I am inclined to remove the template, but wanted to contact you first. I have a business background and understand the terms used, but realize that not everybody shares the same knowledge. Could you please share your concerns for other editors to fully address? Thanks, <b><font color="navy" face="Tahoma">[[User:Cindamuse|Cind.]]</font><font color="purple" face="Tahoma">[[User talk:Cindamuse#top|amuse]]</font></b> 01:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
16983 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16982 +++$+++ 16982 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 08:15:00 +++$+++ 1.309360500E09 +++$+++ Well, the section begins by saying \"The BTS process leverages: business simulations and experiential learning solutions, in-depth customization and a results-focused approach that tracks performance and measures business impact\", and then continues in similar vein. A whole hive of buzzwords. Specific examples on the article talk page. . .  +++$+++ :Well, the section begins by saying "The BTS process leverages: business simulations and experiential learning solutions, in-depth customization and a results-focused approach that tracks performance and measures business impact", and then continues in similar vein. A whole hive of buzzwords. Specific examples on the article talk page. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 08:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
16984 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16982 +++$+++ 16982 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.309371660E09 +++$+++ Not according to most articles touting business products. . .  +++$+++ :Not according to most articles touting business products. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 11:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

279128 +++$+++ Chalst +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279128 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-27 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.122518340E09 +++$+++ I had a look at the links that he added to the pages: they are of unpublished works, but seem to be of high quality.  I don't really know what the criteria is to qualify as an external link; I've spent too much time trying to find good guidance on this.  I'd elect to leave them, provided: (1) there aren't any more authoritative online sources available, and (2) they are linked to from just the most appropriate article. ---  +++$+++ I had a look at the links that he added to the pages: they are of unpublished works, but seem to be of high quality.  I don't really know what the criteria is to qualify as an external link; I've spent too much time trying to find good guidance on this.  I'd elect to leave them, provided: (1) there aren't any more authoritative online sources available, and (2) they are linked to from just the most appropriate article. --- [[User:Chalst|Charles Stewart]] 19:39, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
279129 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279128 +++$+++ 279128 +++$+++ 2005-07-28 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.122547020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the input Charles.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the input Charles. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:37, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
279130 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279128 +++$+++ 279128 +++$+++ 2005-07-29 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.122678360E09 +++$+++ For my part, I would not be in favor of \"banning links to commercially unpublished material\". But as I said above, I am somewhat uncomfortable with links by unknown (to me at least) authors to self-published works. I don't think that it is unreasonable for Wikipedia to be concerned about the reputability of the authors and the publishers of material it links to.  +++$+++ :For my part, I would not be in favor of "banning links to commercially unpublished material". But as I said above, I am somewhat uncomfortable with links by unknown (to me at least) authors to self-published works. I don't think that it is unreasonable for Wikipedia to be concerned about the reputability of the authors and the publishers of material it links to. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:06, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
279131 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279128 +++$+++ 279128 +++$+++ 2005-07-31 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.122849480E09 +++$+++ Hi Edward. What exactly do you want to take to arbitration? If you are simply concerned about affecting Wikipedia's policy on external links, you can raise and discuss that issue here: [[WP:VPP]].  +++$+++ :Hi Edward. What exactly do you want to take to arbitration? If you are simply concerned about affecting Wikipedia's policy on external links, you can raise and discuss that issue here: [[WP:VPP]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:38, July 31, 2005 (UTC)

16985 +++$+++ Gnowor +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16985 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.309761180E09 +++$+++ I was a little confused by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Gnowor\/Legal_Resolutions&diff=437439774&oldid=436551197 this edit].  Notice, this page is in my userspace, and also notice the two headers at the top regarding the purpose of the page.  If you could please refrain from making edits to my userspace without even notifying me of the policies that you believe these pages violate, I would greatly appreciate it.  Thank you.<span style=\"white-space:nowrap;\">--<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ I was a little confused by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Gnowor/Legal_Resolutions&diff=437439774&oldid=436551197 this edit].  Notice, this page is in my userspace, and also notice the two headers at the top regarding the purpose of the page.  If you could please refrain from making edits to my userspace without even notifying me of the policies that you believe these pages violate, I would greatly appreciate it.  Thank you.<span style="white-space:nowrap;">--<font color="green">[[User:Gnowor|Gnowor]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Gnowor|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Gnowor|C]]</sub></span> 23:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
16986 +++$+++ Gnowor +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16985 +++$+++ 16985 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.309761840E09 +++$+++ I'm going to take some time to cool off.  I'll be prepared to discuss with you beginning on July 5th if you still believe these pages are [[WP:SPAM]].  If you do wish to pursue this, please make a request [[WP:3|here]] for a third opinion.  Thank you.<span style=\"white-space:nowrap;\">--<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :I'm going to take some time to cool off.  I'll be prepared to discuss with you beginning on July 5th if you still believe these pages are [[WP:SPAM]].  If you do wish to pursue this, please make a request [[WP:3|here]] for a third opinion.  Thank you.<span style="white-space:nowrap;">--<font color="green">[[User:Gnowor|Gnowor]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Gnowor|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Gnowor|C]]</sub></span> 23:44, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
16987 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16985 +++$+++ 16986 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.309790700E09 +++$+++ Apart from the blatantly promotional content: \"Call to receive a free initial consultation. . .\", I was concerned by your statement \"This page and pages related to it may soon be moved to a wiki hosted elsewhere\", which suggests that the pages do not exist for the benefit of Wikipedia but are there for your own personal convenience. . .  +++$+++ ::Apart from the blatantly promotional content: "Call to receive a free initial consultation. . .", I was concerned by your statement "This page and pages related to it may soon be moved to a wiki hosted elsewhere", which suggests that the pages do not exist for the benefit of Wikipedia but are there for your own personal convenience. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 07:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
16988 +++$+++ Gnowor +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16985 +++$+++ 16987 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.309878600E09 +++$+++ I'm reverting and requesting a full protect as you seem unwilling to open a dialog.  Additionally, I'm searching for an appropriate venue to request that you be educated regarding common courtesy.  Please feel free to open a dialog.<span style=\"white-space:nowrap;\">--<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :::I'm reverting and requesting a full protect as you seem unwilling to open a dialog.  Additionally, I'm searching for an appropriate venue to request that you be educated regarding common courtesy.  Please feel free to open a dialog.<span style="white-space:nowrap;">--<font color="green">[[User:Gnowor|Gnowor]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Gnowor|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Gnowor|C]]</sub></span> 08:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
16989 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16985 +++$+++ 16988 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 09:06:00 +++$+++ 1.309881960E09 +++$+++ Developments awaited with eager anticipation. . .  +++$+++ ::::Developments awaited with eager anticipation. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 09:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

541274 +++$+++ Esn +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-27 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.235731020E09 +++$+++ This was deleted by you because of G7, but I don't see how it applies. I'm sure that more than one author contributed to the article, since I definitely remember contributing to it myself. The article was a valuable, well-defined list. It should have been sent to AFD first. What happened?  +++$+++ This was deleted by you because of G7, but I don't see how it applies. I'm sure that more than one author contributed to the article, since I definitely remember contributing to it myself. The article was a valuable, well-defined list. It should have been sent to AFD first. What happened? [[User:Esn|Esn]] ([[User talk:Esn|talk]]) 02:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
541275 +++$+++ Esn +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541274 +++$+++ 541274 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.235810760E09 +++$+++ Thanks, you are in fact correct. Sorry for bothering you with this misunderstanding.  +++$+++ :Thanks, you are in fact correct. Sorry for bothering you with this misunderstanding. [[User:Esn|Esn]] ([[User talk:Esn|talk]]) 00:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
541276 +++$+++ Esn +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541274 +++$+++ 541274 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.235811060E09 +++$+++ No wait, I suspect what actually happened is a certain user '''moved''' the article to \"list of animated package films\". A redirect should perhaps be added, considering that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:WhatLinksHere\/List_of_package_films a number of redlinks] now go to the deleted page.  +++$+++ :No wait, I suspect what actually happened is a certain user '''moved''' the article to "list of animated package films". A redirect should perhaps be added, considering that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/List_of_package_films a number of redlinks] now go to the deleted page. [[User:Esn|Esn]] ([[User talk:Esn|talk]]) 00:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

279132 +++$+++ R.Koot +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-06 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.123371960E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Allpages&from=Wi&namespace=4] -- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Allpages&from=Wi&namespace=4] --[[User:R.Koot|R.Koot]] 16:46, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
279133 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279132 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-08-06 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.123372140E09 +++$+++ Ahh ... Thanks. Learn something new everyday ;-)  +++$+++ ::Ahh ... Thanks. Learn something new everyday ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:49, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

279134 +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-08 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.123565520E09 +++$+++ Did you miss my request on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics]] that some admin move [[Mathematical reviews]] to [[Mathematical Reviews]] as it is the title of a journal (see [[Talk:Mathematical reviews]]), do you not have time, or do you disagree? (feel free to ignore this message if you do not have time) --  +++$+++ Did you miss my request on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics]] that some admin move [[Mathematical reviews]] to [[Mathematical Reviews]] as it is the title of a journal (see [[Talk:Mathematical reviews]]), do you not have time, or do you disagree? (feel free to ignore this message if you do not have time) -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] ([[User talk:Jitse Niesen|talk]]) 22:32, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
279135 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279134 +++$+++ 279134 +++$+++ 2005-08-08 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.123569840E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I never saw that request. I've moved the page. Feel free to ask me personally next time. I'm happy to help. (Of course I'd could always nominate you for Admin \u2026 )  +++$+++ :Yeah, I never saw that request. I've moved the page. Feel free to ask me personally next time. I'm happy to help. (Of course I'd could always nominate you for Admin … ) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:44, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

16991 +++$+++ Shirt58 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 10:17:00 +++$+++ 1.309886220E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mean_as_custard&oldid=437845513 This edit] was a mistake, a mis-click.  I apologise to all involved, and admit full responsibility for my own mistake.-- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mean_as_custard&oldid=437845513 This edit] was a mistake, a mis-click.  I apologise to all involved, and admit full responsibility for my own mistake.--[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 10:17, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
16992 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16991 +++$+++ 16991 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.309892820E09 +++$+++ No worries, mate. . .  +++$+++ :No worries, mate. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 12:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
16993 +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ Mean as custard +++$+++ 16991 +++$+++ 16991 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.310828220E09 +++$+++ One of the changes you made was to state \"is a real estate industry leader that has built a strong reputation of excellence through its quality. . .\", which may possibly be true, but without an independent reference just sounds like a lot of hype. The company's mission statement is also highly promotional, as are other sections. . .  +++$+++ :One of the changes you made was to state "is a real estate industry leader that has built a strong reputation of excellence through its quality. . .", which may possibly be true, but without an independent reference just sounds like a lot of hype. The company's mission statement is also highly promotional, as are other sections. . . [[User:Mean as custard|Mean as custard]] ([[User talk:Mean as custard#top|talk]]) 07:57, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

541281 +++$+++ Jack Merridew +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541281 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-06 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.236364680E09 +++$+++ Hi. I see you deleted this. It is a real place, people live there, and there is a painting style named for it. Was the article you deleted one that merely needed work? If there is something to work with, please undelete this; if not, I'll start fresh. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi. I see you deleted this. It is a real place, people live there, and there is a painting style named for it. Was the article you deleted one that merely needed work? If there is something to work with, please undelete this; if not, I'll start fresh. Cheers, [[User:Jack Merridew|Jack Merridew]] 10:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
541282 +++$+++ Jack Merridew +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541281 +++$+++ 541281 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.236436920E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I've edited it into a reasonable stub and moved it back to mainspace. I tagged [[User:Jack Merridew\/Batuan, Bali]] for speedy deletion and it may-well be gone by the time you see this. ''Terima kasih'' (thank you). Cheers,  +++$+++ : Thanks. I've edited it into a reasonable stub and moved it back to mainspace. I tagged [[User:Jack Merridew/Batuan, Bali]] for speedy deletion and it may-well be gone by the time you see this. ''Terima kasih'' (thank you). Cheers, [[User:Jack Merridew|Jack Merridew]] 06:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

16995 +++$+++ Nebular110 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 16995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.157016600E09 +++$+++ Hello. I noticed that you recently removed the entire planetary rings section from the [[Saturn]] article on the grounds that the information is covered in the article [[Rings of Saturn]]. While this may be true, it is usually customary to include at least a paragraph or two with some basic information in the main article, if the reader desires more information then he or she may read the more in depth main article. For a good example of this see [[Mars#Geology]] and [[Geology of Mars]]. IN addition, after comparing the deleted information with the [[Rings of Saturn]] article, I noticed that there was quite a bit of information in the deleted text (especially some historical information) that does not appear in [[Rings of Saturn]]. I am asking if you would please either restore the text you removed or instead add the deleted information to the main [[Rings of Saturn]] article so that the knowledge is contained somewhere within Wikipedia and then expand [[Saturn#Planetary rings]] to include at the very least some basic information. Thank you. -- +++$+++ Hello. I noticed that you recently removed the entire planetary rings section from the [[Saturn]] article on the grounds that the information is covered in the article [[Rings of Saturn]]. While this may be true, it is usually customary to include at least a paragraph or two with some basic information in the main article, if the reader desires more information then he or she may read the more in depth main article. For a good example of this see [[Mars#Geology]] and [[Geology of Mars]]. IN addition, after comparing the deleted information with the [[Rings of Saturn]] article, I noticed that there was quite a bit of information in the deleted text (especially some historical information) that does not appear in [[Rings of Saturn]]. I am asking if you would please either restore the text you removed or instead add the deleted information to the main [[Rings of Saturn]] article so that the knowledge is contained somewhere within Wikipedia and then expand [[Saturn#Planetary rings]] to include at the very least some basic information. Thank you. --[[User:Nebular110|Nebular110]] 02:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
16996 +++$+++ Nebular110 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 16995 +++$+++ 16995 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.157027820E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for doing that. I agree with you that the section is longer than it really needs to be. I'll try to fix that, maybe by transfering some of the info to the [[Rings of Saturn]] article. I'm not sure how soon I'll find the time to do that, lots going on right now, but I will put it on my to do list. -- +++$+++ *Hey, thanks for doing that. I agree with you that the section is longer than it really needs to be. I'll try to fix that, maybe by transfering some of the info to the [[Rings of Saturn]] article. I'm not sure how soon I'll find the time to do that, lots going on right now, but I will put it on my to do list. --[[User:Nebular110|Nebular110]] 05:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

541284 +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541284 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-09 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.236662100E09 +++$+++ Hi - I noticed your position on SiBEAM.  I would propose you give a chance to work through the article.  I came into this situation to help out and the article was just deleted without discussion or warning.  If the deleting admin had an issue the article was different enough to merit a real AfD.  That is all I am saying. I think my trackrecord speaks for the quality of the work I do in these kind of situations <font color=\"#3950A5\" size=\"1\">|\u25ba<\/font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color=\"#000070\"><b>\u03cbr\u0431an<\/b><\/font><font color=\"#4D4D4D\">\u044fene\u03c9a\u2113<\/font>]] \u2022  +++$+++ Hi - I noticed your position on SiBEAM.  I would propose you give a chance to work through the article.  I came into this situation to help out and the article was just deleted without discussion or warning.  If the deleting admin had an issue the article was different enough to merit a real AfD.  That is all I am saying. I think my trackrecord speaks for the quality of the work I do in these kind of situations <font color="#3950A5" size="1">|►</font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color="#000070"><b>ϋrбan</b></font><font color="#4D4D4D">яeneωaℓ</font>]] • [[User:Urbanrenewal/talk|<font size="0" color="#BFA137">TALK</font>]] <font color="#3950A5" size="1">◄|</font> 22:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
541285 +++$+++ Urbanrenewal +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541284 +++$+++ 541284 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.236668580E09 +++$+++ I responded to your request on the DRV page.  You can feel free to respond there. <font color=\"#3950A5\" size=\"1\">|\u25ba<\/font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color=\"#000070\"><b>\u03cbr\u0431an<\/b><\/font><font color=\"#4D4D4D\">\u044fene\u03c9a\u2113<\/font>]] \u2022  +++$+++ *I responded to your request on the DRV page.  You can feel free to respond there. <font color="#3950A5" size="1">|►</font> [[User:Urbanrenewal|<font color="#000070"><b>ϋrбan</b></font><font color="#4D4D4D">яeneωaℓ</font>]] • [[User:Urbanrenewal/talk|<font size="0" color="#BFA137">TALK</font>]] <font color="#3950A5" size="1">◄|</font> 00:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

279142 +++$+++ 70.57.82.114 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-11 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.123761840E09 +++$+++ So of the above three, historians agree that Caesar had homosexual sex, while on the other two they do not agree that they had such sex, but they do agree that they had the sexual attractions. And under the definition of bisexual all you need is the attractions, for example a homosexual can be celibate, but that does not change that he is homosexual.  +++$+++ So of the above three, historians agree that Caesar had homosexual sex, while on the other two they do not agree that they had such sex, but they do agree that they had the sexual attractions. And under the definition of bisexual all you need is the attractions, for example a homosexual can be celibate, but that does not change that he is homosexual. [[User:70.57.82.114|70.57.82.114]] 05:04, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
279143 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279142 +++$+++ 279142 +++$+++ 2005-08-11 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.123809720E09 +++$+++ I originally removed these additions you made to the list while doing \"vandalism patrol\". I apologize as it seems obvious to me now that they weren't \"vandalism\". So please accept my apologies. However, I've removed again [[Julius Caesar]] and [[Sigmund Freud]] (someone else removed [[William Shakespeare]]). For my reasoning please see the talk page: [[Talk:List of famous gay, lesbian or bisexual people]]. I'd be happy to discuss this further there. Perhaps you can persuade me or others that I'm wrong.  +++$+++ :I originally removed these additions you made to the list while doing "vandalism patrol". I apologize as it seems obvious to me now that they weren't "vandalism". So please accept my apologies. However, I've removed again [[Julius Caesar]] and [[Sigmund Freud]] (someone else removed [[William Shakespeare]]). For my reasoning please see the talk page: [[Talk:List of famous gay, lesbian or bisexual people]]. I'd be happy to discuss this further there. Perhaps you can persuade me or others that I'm wrong. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:22, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

17000 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.189724940E09 +++$+++ Sorry if it seems like I'm bugging you about the above image - I'm trying to determine the copyright holder, which needs to be specified on the image page per [[WP:NFCC#10]]a. When I click on the source link, I get an \"access forbidden\" message. Can you please specify the copyright holder on the page?  +++$+++ Sorry if it seems like I'm bugging you about the above image - I'm trying to determine the copyright holder, which needs to be specified on the image page per [[WP:NFCC#10]]a. When I click on the source link, I get an "access forbidden" message. Can you please specify the copyright holder on the page? [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 16:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
17001 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17000 +++$+++ 17000 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.189725480E09 +++$+++ Thanks - the only other thing required, so far as I can tell, is evidence that the copyright holder published this image, to satisfy [[WP:NFCC#4]]. As the source link can't be accessed, and toymania.com is apparently not the copyright holder, where was the image published? Thanks...  +++$+++ :Thanks - the only other thing required, so far as I can tell, is evidence that the copyright holder published this image, to satisfy [[WP:NFCC#4]]. As the source link can't be accessed, and toymania.com is apparently not the copyright holder, where was the image published? Thanks... [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 16:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
17002 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17000 +++$+++ 17001 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.189726080E09 +++$+++ The image is accessible at the URL I published. Connectivity is sometimes intermittent, apparently; I too once saw an \"access forbidden\" message today. However, it is available as of 30 seconds ago. +++$+++ ::The image is accessible at the URL I published. Connectivity is sometimes intermittent, apparently; I too once saw an "access forbidden" message today. However, it is available as of 30 seconds ago.[[User:Ylee|Ylee]] 16:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
17003 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17000 +++$+++ 17002 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.189726200E09 +++$+++ OK, will keep trying, but I'm having no luck. When you looked at it, what did it say regarding publication? Did it specify the comic book in which this image was published? That's really all we need re [[WP:NFCC#4]].  +++$+++ ::: OK, will keep trying, but I'm having no luck. When you looked at it, what did it say regarding publication? Did it specify the comic book in which this image was published? That's really all we need re [[WP:NFCC#4]]. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 16:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
17004 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17000 +++$+++ 17003 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.189726320E09 +++$+++ FYI, the message I get is ''Forbidden: You don't have permission to access \/news\/images\/0402_supergirl.jpg on this server.''.  +++$+++ :::: FYI, the message I get is ''Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /news/images/0402_supergirl.jpg on this server.''. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 16:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
17005 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17000 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.189726680E09 +++$+++ Gah, that's not good. We need some verifiable evidence of prior publication by DC Comics. Do you have another image (with a more verifiable status) that can be used?  +++$+++ :::::: Gah, that's not good. We need some verifiable evidence of prior publication by DC Comics. Do you have another image (with a more verifiable status) that can be used? [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 16:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
17006 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17000 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.189728420E09 +++$+++ Original comic-book cover and commercial posters identified.  +++$+++ ::::::: Original comic-book cover and commercial posters identified. [[User:Ylee|Ylee]] 17:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
17007 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17000 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.189729020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for straightening this out - I marked the image as \"reviewed\" for [[Supergirl]]. Respectfully -  +++$+++ ::::::::Thanks for straightening this out - I marked the image as "reviewed" for [[Supergirl]]. Respectfully - [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 17:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

279146 +++$+++ Func +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-11 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.123812960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Func|Func]](&nbsp;[[User_talk:Func|t]],&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Func|c]],&nbsp;[[Special:Emailuser/Func|e]],[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&user=Func &nbsp;]&nbsp;) 19:16, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
279147 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279146 +++$+++ 279146 +++$+++ 2005-08-11 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.123813380E09 +++$+++ I'm glad too. I'm sure you will be a great admin. It's nice to know some of the good guys.  +++$+++ :I'm glad too. I'm sure you will be a great admin. It's nice to know some of the good guys. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:23, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

614503 +++$+++ Moriori +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-30 08:09:00 +++$+++ 1.151680140E09 +++$+++ Hi Daniel, I suggest changing the name of [[100 greatest guitar solos]] to [[Guitar World's 100 top solos]]. Much less POV. Comments?  +++$+++ Hi Daniel, I suggest changing the name of [[100 greatest guitar solos]] to [[Guitar World's 100 top solos]]. Much less POV. Comments? [[User:Moriori|Moriori]] 08:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
614504 +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614503 +++$+++ 614503 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.151680740E09 +++$+++ seems perfectly fine to me  +++$+++ *seems perfectly fine to me [[User:Daniel Olsen|Daniel Olsen]] 08:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

541292 +++$+++ Aelfthrytha +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541292 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-11 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.236772800E09 +++$+++ Hi -- I've finished the recategorization at last, after two months and probably 5,000 edits. However, there are still a bunch of cities, towns, and villages in Baku and Nakhchivan which don't fall into the Rayon categories. How do you think those should be handled?  +++$+++ Hi -- I've finished the recategorization at last, after two months and probably 5,000 edits. However, there are still a bunch of cities, towns, and villages in Baku and Nakhchivan which don't fall into the Rayon categories. How do you think those should be handled? [[User:Aelfthrytha|Aelfthrytha]] ([[User talk:Aelfthrytha|talk]]) 05:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
541293 +++$+++ Aelfthrytha +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541292 +++$+++ 541292 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.236776640E09 +++$+++ Here is how I understand it: Baku isn't a rayon. Therefore there is no \"blablabla in Baku\" category. There are a lot of cities, towns and villages in it, but it's an autonomous city not a rayon. So I don't know how to categorize those. As for Nakhchivan, the settlements there aren't subdivided by rayon, so it's impossible to sort. '''Also''' do you see any other oversized categories like that in your travels? I'm looking for something new to chip away at now that I finished this one.  +++$+++ :Here is how I understand it: Baku isn't a rayon. Therefore there is no "blablabla in Baku" category. There are a lot of cities, towns and villages in it, but it's an autonomous city not a rayon. So I don't know how to categorize those. As for Nakhchivan, the settlements there aren't subdivided by rayon, so it's impossible to sort. '''Also''' do you see any other oversized categories like that in your travels? I'm looking for something new to chip away at now that I finished this one. [[User:Aelfthrytha|Aelfthrytha]] ([[User talk:Aelfthrytha|talk]]) 06:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

279149 +++$+++ Dragons flight +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-15 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.124172120E09 +++$+++ Again, thanks for the help.   +++$+++ Again, thanks for the help.  [[User:Dragons flight|Dragons flight]] 23:02, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
279150 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279149 +++$+++ 279149 +++$+++ 2005-08-15 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.124175540E09 +++$+++ Ok thanks, for the pointers. As I suppose you noticed, I've only just started doing these, the last couple of days. I used the strike outs because that was what some other admins had done. Also it seemed like it might give others an opportunity to \"review\" what i had done, so as to make sure I was doing everything correctly &mdash; which as it turns out I wasn't ;-) &mdash; I had been removing the \"move\" templates, but I didn't know about the \"moved\"\/\"notmoved\" templates. I will use them from now on. Again thanks.  +++$+++ : Ok thanks, for the pointers. As I suppose you noticed, I've only just started doing these, the last couple of days. I used the strike outs because that was what some other admins had done. Also it seemed like it might give others an opportunity to "review" what i had done, so as to make sure I was doing everything correctly &mdash; which as it turns out I wasn't ;-) &mdash; I had been removing the "move" templates, but I didn't know about the "moved"/"notmoved" templates. I will use them from now on. Again thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:59, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
279151 +++$+++ Dragons flight +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279149 +++$+++ 279150 +++$+++ 2005-08-16 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.124176380E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about the review, if you ever fumble things too badly, you can always be sure that someone will show up to complain about it.  ;-)  I have also posted this same message with another admin that has recently started closing votes.  I believe he is the one you are refering to as also using strike-outs.   +++$+++ ::Don't worry about the review, if you ever fumble things too badly, you can always be sure that someone will show up to complain about it.  ;-)  I have also posted this same message with another admin that has recently started closing votes.  I believe he is the one you are refering to as also using strike-outs.  [[User:Dragons flight|Dragons flight]] 00:13, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

541294 +++$+++ Od Mishehu +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-11 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.236785340E09 +++$+++ I see you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3A76.220.95.202&diff=276411360&oldid=276386432 responded] to an unblock request from 76.220.95.202, saying \"You're not blocked\". As a matter of fact, the IP address is blocked as part of the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:BlockList&ip=76.220.0.0%2F16 76.220.0.0\/16 range], as you would have discovered by using the \"rangeblocks\" link. If there's no current range block on an IP address, you will get a \"No rangeblocks found\" message, and if there is - you will see the relevant block on [[Special:IPBlockList]].  +++$+++ I see you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A76.220.95.202&diff=276411360&oldid=276386432 responded] to an unblock request from 76.220.95.202, saying "You're not blocked". As a matter of fact, the IP address is blocked as part of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:BlockList&ip=76.220.0.0%2F16 76.220.0.0/16 range], as you would have discovered by using the "rangeblocks" link. If there's no current range block on an IP address, you will get a "No rangeblocks found" message, and if there is - you will see the relevant block on [[Special:IPBlockList]]. [[User:Od Mishehu|עוד&nbsp;מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu|Od&nbsp;Mishehu]] 08:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
541295 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541294 +++$+++ 541294 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.236815520E09 +++$+++ I didn't see a block; so range blocks don't show up when checking for whether an IP is blocked?  +++$+++ :I didn't see a block; so range blocks don't show up when checking for whether an IP is blocked? [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] ([[User talk:Carlossuarez46|talk]]) 16:52, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
541296 +++$+++ Od Mishehu +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541294 +++$+++ 541295 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.236815700E09 +++$+++ No. There is a toolserver tool which is linked to in the unblock request (as I said above); rangeblocks never showed up in the block log of IP addresses.  +++$+++ ::No. There is a toolserver tool which is linked to in the unblock request (as I said above); rangeblocks never showed up in the block log of IP addresses. [[User:Od Mishehu|עוד&nbsp;מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu|Od&nbsp;Mishehu]] 16:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

279152 +++$+++ TheoClarke +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-18 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.124408880E09 +++$+++ And our world loses a little lustre. &mdash; +++$+++ And our world loses a little lustre. &mdash;[[User:TheoClarke|Theo ]] [[User_talk:TheoClarke|(Talk)]] 16:48, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
279153 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279152 +++$+++ 279152 +++$+++ 2005-08-18 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.124409300E09 +++$+++ Yup.  +++$+++ :Yup. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:55, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
279154 +++$+++ TheoClarke +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279152 +++$+++ 279153 +++$+++ 2005-08-18 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.124412600E09 +++$+++ But it is brightened a little by your daft edit summary about the section heading. &mdash; +++$+++ ::But it is brightened a little by your daft edit summary about the section heading. &mdash;[[User:TheoClarke|Theo ]] [[User_talk:TheoClarke|(Talk)]] 17:50, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
279155 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279152 +++$+++ 279154 +++$+++ 2005-08-18 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.124414400E09 +++$+++ Well you may have misread my \"daft\" edit summary. I meant that I was \"so sad\" about Fil, that in my sadness (and haste), I had forgotten to make a section heading. I see now that It could also be read a couple of other ways, one that that ''it'' was \"so sad\" ''that'' I had forgotten, or ''I'' was \"so sad\" ''because'' I had forgotten. I find all this, including your \"daft\" remark above amusing, and so I am, if only a little, less sad. Thanks Theo.  +++$+++ :::Well you may have misread my "daft" edit summary. I meant that I was "so sad" about Fil, that in my sadness (and haste), I had forgotten to make a section heading. I see now that It could also be read a couple of other ways, one that that ''it'' was "so sad" ''that'' I had forgotten, or ''I'' was "so sad" ''because'' I had forgotten. I find all this, including your "daft" remark above amusing, and so I am, if only a little, less sad. Thanks Theo. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:20, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

541297 +++$+++ Maedin +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-12 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.236872520E09 +++$+++ Hi, I notice that you recently deleted the [[Emily Eavis]] article.  I can't see deleted content so I can't remark on whether or not the article made a claim to notability, but I do happen to know that she is notable and there are many reliable sources indicating such (a quick Google search shows this, in any case).  I also see that there are a few pages which will now be redlinked.  Could you please provide the article in my user space so that I can view the content and improve it, such that notability won't be an issue?  Thank you!   +++$+++ Hi, I notice that you recently deleted the [[Emily Eavis]] article.  I can't see deleted content so I can't remark on whether or not the article made a claim to notability, but I do happen to know that she is notable and there are many reliable sources indicating such (a quick Google search shows this, in any case).  I also see that there are a few pages which will now be redlinked.  Could you please provide the article in my user space so that I can view the content and improve it, such that notability won't be an issue?  Thank you!  [[User:Maedin|<b><font color="#4B0082">Mae</font><font color="#008080">din</font></b>]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Maedin|<span style="color:#4B0082">talk</span>]]</sup> 08:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
541298 +++$+++ Maedin +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541297 +++$+++ 541297 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.236909960E09 +++$+++ Thank you!  I appreciate it.   +++$+++ :Thank you!  I appreciate it.  [[User:Maedin|<b><font color="#4B0082">Mae</font><font color="#008080">din</font></b>]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Maedin|<span style="color:#4B0082">talk</span>]]</sup> 19:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

527123 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527123 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-08 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.226175720E09 +++$+++ My friend at Combat Camera wound up getting called away from the office yesterday, and never got me any photos yet. Since there is a long break for the holiday, I won't be able to get anything from her until Thursday, minimum. 'Tis unfortunate... I tried to find a few free images, and the only halfway decent one I found is [http:\/\/www.marines.mil\/units\/marforpac\/_layouts\/imagemeta.aspx?image=http:\/\/www.marines.mil\/units\/marforpac\/PublishingImages\/20071111-M-MILLER.jpg here]. I know my wife took a few photos that night and uploaded them to her Photobucket account, but she's... not the best photographer. When she wakes and gives me her password, I'll post you some links. ''' +++$+++ My friend at Combat Camera wound up getting called away from the office yesterday, and never got me any photos yet. Since there is a long break for the holiday, I won't be able to get anything from her until Thursday, minimum. 'Tis unfortunate... I tried to find a few free images, and the only halfway decent one I found is [http://www.marines.mil/units/marforpac/_layouts/imagemeta.aspx?image=http://www.marines.mil/units/marforpac/PublishingImages/20071111-M-MILLER.jpg here]. I know my wife took a few photos that night and uploaded them to her Photobucket account, but she's... not the best photographer. When she wakes and gives me her password, I'll post you some links. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  12:22, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
527124 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527123 +++$+++ 527123 +++$+++ 2008-11-08 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.226186520E09 +++$+++ Take a look at [[United States Marine Corps birthday ball]]! ''' +++$+++ :Take a look at [[United States Marine Corps birthday ball]]! '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  15:22, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
527125 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527123 +++$+++ 527124 +++$+++ 2008-11-09 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.226234820E09 +++$+++ As far as the pagent goes, I'd always kinda assumed it was part of the ball celebration, if it was included at all. This year was the first year that I hadn't seen it at the ball itself (here in Cherry Point), and it seems 29 Palms did the same this year as well. It certainly merits some inclusion in the new article, and I will add a blurb (all of the references do mention it). ''' +++$+++ ::As far as the pagent goes, I'd always kinda assumed it was part of the ball celebration, if it was included at all. This year was the first year that I hadn't seen it at the ball itself (here in Cherry Point), and it seems 29 Palms did the same this year as well. It certainly merits some inclusion in the new article, and I will add a blurb (all of the references do mention it). '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  04:47, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

279157 +++$+++ Arthur Rubin +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-18 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.124423100E09 +++$+++ Your edit of [[Point (geometry)]] makes the redirect of [[Point (topology)]] acceptable.  I still think the encyclopedia would be better off without [[Point (topology)]] at all, but this makes it acceptable to me.  Go ahead and re\/revert, with my compliments. --  +++$+++ Your edit of [[Point (geometry)]] makes the redirect of [[Point (topology)]] acceptable.  I still think the encyclopedia would be better off without [[Point (topology)]] at all, but this makes it acceptable to me.  Go ahead and re/revert, with my compliments. -- [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] 20:45, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
279158 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279157 +++$+++ 279157 +++$+++ 2005-08-18 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.124423520E09 +++$+++ Ok I will. Yes it is not a particularly useful article. But then it ''is'' only a redirect and redirects don't have to be particularly useful ;-).  +++$+++ :Ok I will. Yes it is not a particularly useful article. But then it ''is'' only a redirect and redirects don't have to be particularly useful ;-). [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:52, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

17014 +++$+++ Paginazero +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-27 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.235756940E09 +++$+++ Feel free to contact me, should you have any trouble. Bye, -- +++$+++ Feel free to contact me, should you have any trouble. Bye, --[[User:Paginazero|Paginazero]] ([[User talk:Paginazero|talk]]) 09:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
17015 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17014 +++$+++ 17014 +++$+++ 2009-02-27 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.235757540E09 +++$+++ Thank you for getting back to me.  +++$+++ :Thank you for getting back to me. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 09:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
17016 +++$+++ Paginazero +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17014 +++$+++ 17015 +++$+++ 2009-03-09 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.236641880E09 +++$+++ Sorry - the 7 days are long over. The username is now free. Please log into it:wp for including it into your global account. Bye. -- +++$+++ ::Sorry - the 7 days are long over. The username is now free. Please log into it:wp for including it into your global account. Bye. --[[User:Paginazero|Paginazero]] ([[User talk:Paginazero|talk]]) 16:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

279159 +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-20 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.124526240E09 +++$+++ Thank you for a nomination so glowing that it embarrassed me. Even Boothy did not dare to oppose. Now I can finally delete all those category theory articles that I don't understand. --  +++$+++ Thank you for a nomination so glowing that it embarrassed me. Even Boothy did not dare to oppose. Now I can finally delete all those category theory articles that I don't understand. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] ([[User talk:Jitse Niesen|talk]]) 01:24, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
279160 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279159 +++$+++ 279159 +++$+++ 2005-08-21 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.124615760E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome Jitse, your adminship and everything I said was well-deserved. And if you delete any category theory articles I'll have you shot at dawn.  +++$+++ :You are very welcome Jitse, your adminship and everything I said was well-deserved. And if you delete any category theory articles I'll have you shot at dawn. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:16, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

541304 +++$+++ Amyanda2000 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-15 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.237101000E09 +++$+++ The article that you nominated of mine for deletion was a list of lakes in michigan. However, this comment is more general in nature, because it seems like someone always wants to delete everything I start. Like I said, I know I have a lot to learn, but that doesn't mean that I don't have something to contribute.  +++$+++ The article that you nominated of mine for deletion was a list of lakes in michigan. However, this comment is more general in nature, because it seems like someone always wants to delete everything I start. Like I said, I know I have a lot to learn, but that doesn't mean that I don't have something to contribute. [[User:Amyanda2000|amyanda]] ([[User talk:Amyanda2000|talk]]) 00:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
541305 +++$+++ Amyanda2000 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541304 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-16 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.237201380E09 +++$+++ With respect, a response to your reply has been added to my user page.  +++$+++ **With respect, a response to your reply has been added to my user page. [[User:Amyanda2000|amyanda]] ([[User talk:Amyanda2000|talk]]) 04:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

279161 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-22 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.124770800E09 +++$+++ I think your compromise version is alright too. What annoys me most is that I already had compromised with them by allowing their definition in but would not let them erase the definition, and especially the aprt that myths are believed to be true. If they take that out then the whole thing is botched, as it's missing the most important part, and then everyone will start putting fiction back into the article as if it were myth (some old version of thea rticle were really bad) and doing the same in other articles. AS it is, most of the mythology-related articles are crammed full of fictioncruft about some videograme as if it were just as important. I'm glad you are willing to help out here, as the couple of other editors involved had progressed to leaving harassing messages on my talk page and not listening to a single argument I made while falsely claiming that I never responded at all to try to justify themselves.  +++$+++ I think your compromise version is alright too. What annoys me most is that I already had compromised with them by allowing their definition in but would not let them erase the definition, and especially the aprt that myths are believed to be true. If they take that out then the whole thing is botched, as it's missing the most important part, and then everyone will start putting fiction back into the article as if it were myth (some old version of thea rticle were really bad) and doing the same in other articles. AS it is, most of the mythology-related articles are crammed full of fictioncruft about some videograme as if it were just as important. I'm glad you are willing to help out here, as the couple of other editors involved had progressed to leaving harassing messages on my talk page and not listening to a single argument I made while falsely claiming that I never responded at all to try to justify themselves. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 21:20, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
279162 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279161 +++$+++ 279161 +++$+++ 2005-08-22 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.124771100E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you think I have been of some help. We will see what other editors think ;-)  +++$+++ :I'm glad you think I have been of some help. We will see what other editors think ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:25, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
279163 +++$+++ Elvenscout742 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279161 +++$+++ 279162 +++$+++ 2005-08-23 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.124822220E09 +++$+++ I am happy with it, but DreamGuy did not compromise. He refused to acknowledge the plural word \"mythology\", showing that he clearly still does not accept that we are right. He also only included a perversion of the definition I advocated as a secondary item. The new one is better, as, even though it still gives priority to DreamGuy's definition, it accurately includes the one his opponents advocate as well. The word's literal meaning is \"the telling of stories\", though, and the current is a little awkward with its excessively long opening sentence that was penned by more than one person. I'd like to edit it, but I have the strangest feeling DreamGuy is going to again blindly revert my edit and say I'm doing an edit war.  +++$+++ ::I am happy with it, but DreamGuy did not compromise. He refused to acknowledge the plural word "mythology", showing that he clearly still does not accept that we are right. He also only included a perversion of the definition I advocated as a secondary item. The new one is better, as, even though it still gives priority to DreamGuy's definition, it accurately includes the one his opponents advocate as well. The word's literal meaning is "the telling of stories", though, and the current is a little awkward with its excessively long opening sentence that was penned by more than one person. I'd like to edit it, but I have the strangest feeling DreamGuy is going to again blindly revert my edit and say I'm doing an edit war. [[User:Elvenscout742|elvenscout742]] 11:37, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
279164 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279161 +++$+++ 279163 +++$+++ 2005-08-23 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.124830320E09 +++$+++ No, I did compromise, as your definiton (the popular definition by the poplic who doesn;t know what it's talking about, much like the popular definition of schizophrenia has nothing to do with the real definition) was included even though it really shouldn;t be for an encyclopedia article. That's a major compromise. The literal meaning you claim is false, and \"mythologies\" is still more awkward and less correct than the simple straightforward and totally accurate \"myths\", and you keep labeling my edits \"blind reverts\" when we should really be labeling your edits \"blind changes\". You need to stop making changes on articles about topics you do not understand and paying attention to people when they explain things to you instead of stubbornly insisting that your way is correct against all evidence.  +++$+++ :::No, I did compromise, as your definiton (the popular definition by the poplic who doesn;t know what it's talking about, much like the popular definition of schizophrenia has nothing to do with the real definition) was included even though it really shouldn;t be for an encyclopedia article. That's a major compromise. The literal meaning you claim is false, and "mythologies" is still more awkward and less correct than the simple straightforward and totally accurate "myths", and you keep labeling my edits "blind reverts" when we should really be labeling your edits "blind changes". You need to stop making changes on articles about topics you do not understand and paying attention to people when they explain things to you instead of stubbornly insisting that your way is correct against all evidence. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 13:52, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
279165 +++$+++ Elvenscout742 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279161 +++$+++ 279164 +++$+++ 2005-08-25 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.125035760E09 +++$+++ DreamGuy, how many times do I have to explain to you that the items mentioned in the list are not individual \"myths\", rather \"mythologies\", being collections of such stories from particular regions? Could you at least settle for \"mythoi\" (the plural of \"mythos\") or \"mythi\" (the plural of \"mythus\")? Both words are defined as being technical terms for \"a myth or mythology\". That way we both get to continue to see ourselves as being right (even though I don't think we'll ever be able to agree on this issue).  +++$+++ ::::DreamGuy, how many times do I have to explain to you that the items mentioned in the list are not individual "myths", rather "mythologies", being collections of such stories from particular regions? Could you at least settle for "mythoi" (the plural of "mythos") or "mythi" (the plural of "mythus")? Both words are defined as being technical terms for "a myth or mythology". That way we both get to continue to see ourselves as being right (even though I don't think we'll ever be able to agree on this issue). [[User:Elvenscout742|elvenscout742]] 22:56, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

17019 +++$+++ Drmargi +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17019 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-15 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.237164240E09 +++$+++ I reverted your edit on \"In Plain Sight.\"  You removed basic factual information about the main character without an edit summary.  If there's a reason to remove it, please state it in the edit summary.  Otherwise, edits with no summary are likely to be reverted.  +++$+++ I reverted your edit on "In Plain Sight."  You removed basic factual information about the main character without an edit summary.  If there's a reason to remove it, please state it in the edit summary.  Otherwise, edits with no summary are likely to be reverted. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi|talk]]) 17:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
17020 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17019 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-11 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.239436260E09 +++$+++ Please continue this discussion on the [[Talk:California Institute of Technology|Talk page for the article]]. Short version: It's not very relevant to a popular culture section.  +++$+++ ::Please continue this discussion on the [[Talk:California Institute of Technology|Talk page for the article]]. Short version: It's not very relevant to a popular culture section. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 00:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

17022 +++$+++ 76.66.202.139 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-05 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.241553960E09 +++$+++ Please read [[WP:PROD]]. Reimplementing a PROD indiscriminately can be considered abuse of process. You should understand how prod works, before making claims about the process. [[Special:Contributions\/76.66.202.139|76.66.202.139]] ( +++$+++ Please read [[WP:PROD]]. Reimplementing a PROD indiscriminately can be considered abuse of process. You should understand how prod works, before making claims about the process. [[Special:Contributions/76.66.202.139|76.66.202.139]] ([[User talk:76.66.202.139|talk]]) 13:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
17023 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17022 +++$+++ 17022 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.241555340E09 +++$+++ I read it after seeing your unexplained blanking\/redirect and have read it again. Your action still doesn't make any sense as it does not fit into any of the criteria listed under \"Before deletion.\" It fits best under the \"blanking the entire article\" vandalism under \"Contested deletions,\" which is why I restored the PROD tag.  +++$+++ :I read it after seeing your unexplained blanking/redirect and have read it again. Your action still doesn't make any sense as it does not fit into any of the criteria listed under "Before deletion." It fits best under the "blanking the entire article" vandalism under "Contested deletions," which is why I restored the PROD tag. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 13:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
17024 +++$+++ 76.66.202.139 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17022 +++$+++ 17023 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.241556780E09 +++$+++ If you read the PROD rationale given, it was duplication of information found elsewhere, which would be [[WP:CFORK]], and thus should be redirected or deleted, since it's a valid search term, redirecting is proper. Redirecting is ''not'' blanking, since the redirect target should still contain the information. (If it doesn't then it would be vandalism, but in this case, the target does contain the info). [[WP:BOLD]]ly redirecting is something that qualifies as fixing the article. [[Special:Contributions\/76.66.202.139|76.66.202.139]] ( +++$+++ ::If you read the PROD rationale given, it was duplication of information found elsewhere, which would be [[WP:CFORK]], and thus should be redirected or deleted, since it's a valid search term, redirecting is proper. Redirecting is ''not'' blanking, since the redirect target should still contain the information. (If it doesn't then it would be vandalism, but in this case, the target does contain the info). [[WP:BOLD]]ly redirecting is something that qualifies as fixing the article. [[Special:Contributions/76.66.202.139|76.66.202.139]] ([[User talk:76.66.202.139|talk]]) 13:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

541311 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541311 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-12 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.236916440E09 +++$+++ If you will not desist in removing tagging work from people who are patrolling short pages, you will be blocked.  +++$+++ If you will not desist in removing tagging work from people who are patrolling short pages, you will be blocked. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] ([[User talk:Carlossuarez46|talk]]) 20:54, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
541312 +++$+++ Cander0000 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541311 +++$+++ 541311 +++$+++ 2009-03-13 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.236945060E09 +++$+++ ?  'short pages'...?  like article stubs ([[WP:Stub]]), or something else?  Apologies for any offense.  Please, hopefully you can enlighten me so this does not cause you any further difficulty.   +++$+++ : ?  'short pages'...?  like article stubs ([[WP:Stub]]), or something else?  Apologies for any offense.  Please, hopefully you can enlighten me so this does not cause you any further difficulty.  [[User:Cander0000|Cander0000]] ([[User talk:Cander0000#top|talk]]) 04:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

279168 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-22 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.124775120E09 +++$+++ Got to admit that made me smile.  A sysop's nightmare!   Best wishes. -- +++$+++ Got to admit that made me smile.  A sysop's nightmare!   Best wishes. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]][[User talk:Tony Sidaway|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 22:32, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
279169 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279168 +++$+++ 279168 +++$+++ 2005-08-22 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.124779020E09 +++$+++ Thanks. That first edit summary was a bad copy and paste, and yes I did have a moment of panic. I'm glad you found it amusing ;-)   +++$+++ :Thanks. That first edit summary was a bad copy and paste, and yes I did have a moment of panic. I'm glad you found it amusing ;-)  [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:37, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

541313 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541313 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-16 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.237259700E09 +++$+++ Unmarking marked patrolled pages is vandalism. Stop!  +++$+++ Unmarking marked patrolled pages is vandalism. Stop! [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] ([[User talk:Carlossuarez46|talk]]) 20:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
541314 +++$+++ Cander0000 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541313 +++$+++ 541313 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.237289700E09 +++$+++ Tx for commenting...  The message seems templated.  Perhaps I'm wrong.  If you can explain further what issue you are speaking of, perhaps we can work together towards a solution.  The only contribution I made to that page was to categorize it once upon a time... and then remove some comments in the article unrelated to the topic (potentially someone testing some markup, etc.)  Good fun!  +++$+++ :Tx for commenting...  The message seems templated.  Perhaps I'm wrong.  If you can explain further what issue you are speaking of, perhaps we can work together towards a solution.  The only contribution I made to that page was to categorize it once upon a time... and then remove some comments in the article unrelated to the topic (potentially someone testing some markup, etc.)  Good fun! [[User:Cander0000|Cander0000]] ([[User talk:Cander0000|talk]]) 04:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

279170 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-26 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.125049380E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. Your edit to this article removed two paragraphs for some reason. Must be some Wikipedia quirck again, but I thought you would like to know about it. I fixed it.  +++$+++ Hi Paul. Your edit to this article removed two paragraphs for some reason. Must be some Wikipedia quirck again, but I thought you would like to know about it. I fixed it. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] 02:43, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
279171 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279170 +++$+++ 279170 +++$+++ 2005-08-26 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.125049800E09 +++$+++ Hmm that is ''really odd'', not sure how that could possibly occur, just randomly droping two paragraphs like that? Bizarre! Thanks for catching it.  +++$+++ :Hmm that is ''really odd'', not sure how that could possibly occur, just randomly droping two paragraphs like that? Bizarre! Thanks for catching it. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:50, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

17027 +++$+++ Mac520 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-06 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.249548000E09 +++$+++ Clever edit here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Car_Allowance_Rebate_System&diff=306304797&oldid=306303264] Relief to see someone else with economics knowledge  +++$+++ Clever edit here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Car_Allowance_Rebate_System&diff=306304797&oldid=306303264] Relief to see someone else with economics knowledge [[User:Mac520|Mac520]] ([[User talk:Mac520|talk]]) 01:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
17028 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17027 +++$+++ 17027 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.249548120E09 +++$+++ That's very kind of you. I always favor integrating links whenever possible.  +++$+++ :That's very kind of you. I always favor integrating links whenever possible. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 01:42, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

279173 +++$+++ Rich Farmbrough +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-28 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.125295620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the welcome, and for fixing up my errors with status.  I'm pressing on with combinatorics, and quite enjoying the challenge!  +++$+++ Thanks for the welcome, and for fixing up my errors with status.  I'm pressing on with combinatorics, and quite enjoying the challenge! [[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich Farmbrough]] 23:07, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
279174 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279173 +++$+++ 279173 +++$+++ 2005-08-29 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.125299100E09 +++$+++ You are welcome Rich, glad to help. You are doing great work on the PM project!  +++$+++ :You are welcome Rich, glad to help. You are doing great work on the PM project! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:05, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

541318 +++$+++ Mrs.Maria +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-19 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.237499460E09 +++$+++ Hi, Carlossuarez. I read that you are familiar with classical arguments in Spanish and Italian. I am new to wikipedia and I'd like to write about, but I have a problem: my husband -for reasons that I believe are not fair- is not allowed to post and I am afraid that our same IP can create me problems. Can I use the same computer at home? Muchas gracias. -- +++$+++ Hi, Carlossuarez. I read that you are familiar with classical arguments in Spanish and Italian. I am new to wikipedia and I'd like to write about, but I have a problem: my husband -for reasons that I believe are not fair- is not allowed to post and I am afraid that our same IP can create me problems. Can I use the same computer at home? Muchas gracias. --[[User:Mrs.Maria|Mrs.Maria]] ([[User talk:Mrs.Maria|talk]]) 14:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
541319 +++$+++ Mrs.Maria +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541318 +++$+++ 541318 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.237529400E09 +++$+++ Gracias por la respuesta. Eso significa que puedo escribir sin problemas en wikipedia, usando el modem de mi casa (que esta bajo el nombre de mi marido)? Thanks.-- +++$+++ :Gracias por la respuesta. Eso significa que puedo escribir sin problemas en wikipedia, usando el modem de mi casa (que esta bajo el nombre de mi marido)? Thanks.--[[User:Mrs.Maria|Mrs.Maria]] ([[User talk:Mrs.Maria|talk]]) 23:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
541320 +++$+++ Mrs.Maria +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541318 +++$+++ 541319 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.237531320E09 +++$+++ OK. I am using the modem of my home and all seems without problems. My husband ([[user:brunodam]]) was forced to withdraw by a group of nationalistic Croats who obtained later to ban him in a tricky way. Please read his farewell: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Brunodam&oldid=228141778]. These Croats attacked many other Italians and that is why I am afraid to be banned if I use the same IP of my husband. But I see that now all is OK with this post. Gracias.-- +++$+++ ::OK. I am using the modem of my home and all seems without problems. My husband ([[user:brunodam]]) was forced to withdraw by a group of nationalistic Croats who obtained later to ban him in a tricky way. Please read his farewell: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Brunodam&oldid=228141778]. These Croats attacked many other Italians and that is why I am afraid to be banned if I use the same IP of my husband. But I see that now all is OK with this post. Gracias.--[[User:Mrs.Maria|Mrs.Maria]] ([[User talk:Mrs.Maria|talk]]) 23:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

445748 +++$+++ Monkeys 9711 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445748 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-16 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.310878260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Monkeys 9711|Monkeys 9711]] ([[User talk:Monkeys 9711|talk]]) 21:51, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
445749 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445748 +++$+++ 445748 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.310892960E09 +++$+++ I've been out, just returned; will respond in the morning.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ :I've been out, just returned; will respond in the morning.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 01:56, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
445750 +++$+++ Monkeys 9711 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445748 +++$+++ 445749 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.310896440E09 +++$+++ Okay, that is fine.  +++$+++ ::Okay, that is fine. [[User:Monkeys 9711|Monkeys 9711]] ([[User talk:Monkeys 9711|talk]]) 02:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

17032 +++$+++ RashersTierney +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-20 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.253509560E09 +++$+++ Redlinking is the ''usual'' method of encouraging new articles. The issues raised in this Article elevated the significance of the aerodrome in question. It may be that sources are limited, but that does not preclude nominating it. Regards.  +++$+++ Redlinking is the ''usual'' method of encouraging new articles. The issues raised in this Article elevated the significance of the aerodrome in question. It may be that sources are limited, but that does not preclude nominating it. Regards. [[User:RashersTierney|RashersTierney]] ([[User talk:RashersTierney|talk]]) 22:06, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
17033 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17032 +++$+++ 17032 +++$+++ 2009-09-20 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.253509680E09 +++$+++ After reviewing WP:REDLINK (which I should have done before my edit) I see that you were right and I am wrong. Thank you for the correction.  +++$+++ :After reviewing WP:REDLINK (which I should have done before my edit) I see that you were right and I am wrong. Thank you for the correction. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 22:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
17034 +++$+++ RashersTierney +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17032 +++$+++ 17033 +++$+++ 2009-09-20 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.253512800E09 +++$+++ No prob. Regards.  +++$+++ ::No prob. Regards. [[User:RashersTierney|RashersTierney]] ([[User talk:RashersTierney|talk]]) 23:00, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

279178 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279178 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-30 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.125440340E09 +++$+++ so the AD page needs some substantial revision; see its talk page and [[Talk:Winning_strategy#Organizational_questions]]. But I don't think merging in the PM article is the way to go.  Mainly the PM article should be used to make sure we haven't forgotten anything.  That's my review; I didn't see how to encapsulate it into one of the choices given. -- +++$+++ so the AD page needs some substantial revision; see its talk page and [[Talk:Winning_strategy#Organizational_questions]]. But I don't think merging in the PM article is the way to go.  Mainly the PM article should be used to make sure we haven't forgotten anything.  That's my review; I didn't see how to encapsulate it into one of the choices given. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 15:19, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
279179 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279178 +++$+++ 279178 +++$+++ 2005-08-30 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.125445080E09 +++$+++ Hi Travatore. Maybe we need a new status of \"WP article ''will be'' more complete\" ;-) But perhaps the situation you are describing, is that the PM article has content that our article doesn't but you don't want to use any of the actual text from PM? Rather just use it as a reference? If so that is fine with me. As for the \"status\", I think \"needs to be merged\" is not really inconsistent with such a situation, and so I would suggest simply making the status that for now, with whatever qualifying comments you think are appropriate, and after our article has been rewritten, changing the status to \"WP article more complete\". What do you think? It doesn't really matter all that much anyway, as these are all just notes to ourselves. But I must confess I do derive a foolish pleasure from checking one more item off the list ;-)  +++$+++ :Hi Travatore. Maybe we need a new status of "WP article ''will be'' more complete" ;-) But perhaps the situation you are describing, is that the PM article has content that our article doesn't but you don't want to use any of the actual text from PM? Rather just use it as a reference? If so that is fine with me. As for the "status", I think "needs to be merged" is not really inconsistent with such a situation, and so I would suggest simply making the status that for now, with whatever qualifying comments you think are appropriate, and after our article has been rewritten, changing the status to "WP article more complete". What do you think? It doesn't really matter all that much anyway, as these are all just notes to ourselves. But I must confess I do derive a foolish pleasure from checking one more item off the list ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:38, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

279180 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-30 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.125462060E09 +++$+++ I must admit I did the deletions voluntarily :-( The decision came from some uncertainities I've been having with the references, concerning the primary sources. The possibilities are two: 1) Putting in reference all the authors recorded in the notes 2) Putting in reference only the dominant source or sources, like putting in reference only Cornelius Nepos' Datames for the [[Datames]] article, Polybius for [[Sosibius]]. What's your opinion?  +++$+++ I must admit I did the deletions voluntarily :-( The decision came from some uncertainities I've been having with the references, concerning the primary sources. The possibilities are two: 1) Putting in reference all the authors recorded in the notes 2) Putting in reference only the dominant source or sources, like putting in reference only Cornelius Nepos' Datames for the [[Datames]] article, Polybius for [[Sosibius]]. What's your opinion? [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:21, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
279181 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279180 +++$+++ 279180 +++$+++ 2005-08-30 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.125463200E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux. If you mention a work in the notes then that work should be listed in the references. For the sake of [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]] I prefer as many reference works and citations to those works as possible. Can you say what your doubts were? I can't see any reason not to include them. Regards  +++$+++ :Hi Aldux. If you mention a work in the notes then that work should be listed in the references. For the sake of [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]] I prefer as many reference works and citations to those works as possible. Can you say what your doubts were? I can't see any reason not to include them. Regards [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:40, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

17037 +++$+++ Heathhunnicutt +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17037 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-06 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.273190280E09 +++$+++ Hello, YLee.  Are you an employee, student, faculty, or otherwise affiliated with Caltech, JPL, or a member of the Caltech or JPL communities?  I ask because I notice you are putting a lot of effort into the [[Caltech]] article.  In fact, you surely remember reverting my recent contributions which you described as \"good faith.\"  In reviewing the history of the article, the article talk page, your own personal talk page (this page), and the history of your talk page, it appears that you have maintained certain aspects of the article as you deem fit.  Soon, we will discuss Wikipedia's editorial policies.  First, the most important question I have you regards your point of view.  Personally, I attended Caltech and never graduated.  I believe this qualifies me still as a member of the community.  With that in mind, and in the certainty that many readers of Wikipedia are members of the Caltech community -- what is your connection, if any, with Caltech?   +++$+++ Hello, YLee.  Are you an employee, student, faculty, or otherwise affiliated with Caltech, JPL, or a member of the Caltech or JPL communities?  I ask because I notice you are putting a lot of effort into the [[Caltech]] article.  In fact, you surely remember reverting my recent contributions which you described as "good faith."  In reviewing the history of the article, the article talk page, your own personal talk page (this page), and the history of your talk page, it appears that you have maintained certain aspects of the article as you deem fit.  Soon, we will discuss Wikipedia's editorial policies.  First, the most important question I have you regards your point of view.  Personally, I attended Caltech and never graduated.  I believe this qualifies me still as a member of the community.  With that in mind, and in the certainty that many readers of Wikipedia are members of the Caltech community -- what is your connection, if any, with Caltech?  [[User:Heathhunnicutt|Heathhunnicutt]] ([[User talk:Heathhunnicutt|talk]]) 16:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
17038 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17037 +++$+++ 17037 +++$+++ 2010-05-06 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.273196880E09 +++$+++ My affiliation (or not) with Caltech is irrelevant to my edits. I am happy to discuss the edit in question with you, at [[Talk:California Institute of Technology|the Talk page]].  +++$+++ :My affiliation (or not) with Caltech is irrelevant to my edits. I am happy to discuss the edit in question with you, at [[Talk:California Institute of Technology|the Talk page]]. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 18:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
17039 +++$+++ Heathhunnicutt +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17037 +++$+++ 17038 +++$+++ 2010-05-08 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.273310040E09 +++$+++ Your affiliation is relevant because you have a pattern of edits which indicate the possibility of a non-neutral point of view.  [[WP:NPOV]] is a policy of Wikipedia and your bias is a matter of valid concern here.  You have made a number of edit reversions which, on the surface, do not adhere to Wikipedia guidelines.  I am interested in first discussing your evident POV bias and not limiting the discussion to your one edit which triggered my curiosity.  I have been looking through your contribution history and the history of the [[Caltech]] article, and I see that you have made a number of edits which I intend to call into question.  I therefore reject your move to narrow the scope of my inquiry away from your possible point-of-view bias.  I'll give you another chance to reveal your Institute affiliation.  Keep in mind that Wikipedia admins will have not trouble shedding light on the question.  If you are bound by the Caltech Honor Code and choose not to reveal your affiliation, it would seem that you may be in violation of the Honor Code also.  Cooperation with the policies of Wikipedia is not unfair participation even if you make mistakes, but any campaign maintained through concealing your affiliation would seem unfair to me.  What, if any, is your Institute affiliation?  +++$+++ ::Your affiliation is relevant because you have a pattern of edits which indicate the possibility of a non-neutral point of view.  [[WP:NPOV]] is a policy of Wikipedia and your bias is a matter of valid concern here.  You have made a number of edit reversions which, on the surface, do not adhere to Wikipedia guidelines.  I am interested in first discussing your evident POV bias and not limiting the discussion to your one edit which triggered my curiosity.  I have been looking through your contribution history and the history of the [[Caltech]] article, and I see that you have made a number of edits which I intend to call into question.  I therefore reject your move to narrow the scope of my inquiry away from your possible point-of-view bias.  I'll give you another chance to reveal your Institute affiliation.  Keep in mind that Wikipedia admins will have not trouble shedding light on the question.  If you are bound by the Caltech Honor Code and choose not to reveal your affiliation, it would seem that you may be in violation of the Honor Code also.  Cooperation with the policies of Wikipedia is not unfair participation even if you make mistakes, but any campaign maintained through concealing your affiliation would seem unfair to me.  What, if any, is your Institute affiliation? [[User:Heathhunnicutt|Heathhunnicutt]] ([[User talk:Heathhunnicutt|talk]]) 02:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
17040 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17037 +++$+++ 17039 +++$+++ 2010-05-08 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.273317480E09 +++$+++ Again, feel free to discuss my or anyone else's edits at the [[Talk:California Institute of Technology|Talk page]].  +++$+++ :::Again, feel free to discuss my or anyone else's edits at the [[Talk:California Institute of Technology|Talk page]]. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 04:18, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

279182 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279182 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-31 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.125510240E09 +++$+++ Speaking of something else, sadly I've built a duplicate article :-( I've wrote [[Satyric Drama]], only to find that [[Satyr play]] already exists. How can I mend the problem? Bye  +++$+++ Speaking of something else, sadly I've built a duplicate article :-( I've wrote [[Satyric Drama]], only to find that [[Satyr play]] already exists. How can I mend the problem? Bye [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 10:44, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
279183 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279182 +++$+++ 279182 +++$+++ 2005-08-31 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.125520620E09 +++$+++ No problem, I've fixed things up, I think. I've merged your content from Satyric Drama into [[Satyr play]] (with a few minor changes, feel free to edit it however you think appropriate). I've deleted \"Satyric Drama\", but I've created a redirect (do you know what these are?) from [[Satyric drama]] (notice the lower case \"d\", this is the correct capitalization). Also I've created a new template \"SeyffertDCA\" to be used like \"SmithDGRBM\" and added it to [[Satyr play]]. If you've used other text from that work, you should go back and add that template to those articles.  +++$+++ :No problem, I've fixed things up, I think. I've merged your content from Satyric Drama into [[Satyr play]] (with a few minor changes, feel free to edit it however you think appropriate). I've deleted "Satyric Drama", but I've created a redirect (do you know what these are?) from [[Satyric drama]] (notice the lower case "d", this is the correct capitalization). Also I've created a new template "SeyffertDCA" to be used like "SmithDGRBM" and added it to [[Satyr play]]. If you've used other text from that work, you should go back and add that template to those articles. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:37, August 31, 2005 (UTC)

279184 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-31 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.125530040E09 +++$+++ Great! And thanks for the new template, I've really missed it. I tried to solve the problem of missing templates using pseudo-templates that ''seemed'' templates, but were not. Could you please construct a template for Smith's ''Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiques'' and one for his ''Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography'', since I'didn't find them in http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Template_messages\/Sources_of_articles? And sorry if I'm becoming a bit naggy ;-)  +++$+++ Great! And thanks for the new template, I've really missed it. I tried to solve the problem of missing templates using pseudo-templates that ''seemed'' templates, but were not. Could you please construct a template for Smith's ''Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiques'' and one for his ''Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography'', since I'didn't find them in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages/Sources_of_articles? And sorry if I'm becoming a bit naggy ;-) [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 16:14, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
279185 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279184 +++$+++ 279184 +++$+++ 2005-08-31 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.125533040E09 +++$+++ Ok I've created \"SmithDGRA\" and \"SmithDGRG\". Note that while there exist articles for ''[[Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology]]'' and ''[[Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities]]'' there is no article yet for ''[[Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography]]'', but I have nevertheless linked it in the template. So as a penance for your sins, you must write that article ;-) (otherwise you will be forced to look at that ugly red link all the time) And consider yourself lucky I don't make you write an article on Seyffert's ''Dictionary of Classical Antiquities'' as well!  +++$+++ :Ok I've created "SmithDGRA" and "SmithDGRG". Note that while there exist articles for ''[[Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology]]'' and ''[[Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities]]'' there is no article yet for ''[[Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography]]'', but I have nevertheless linked it in the template. So as a penance for your sins, you must write that article ;-) (otherwise you will be forced to look at that ugly red link all the time) And consider yourself lucky I don't make you write an article on Seyffert's ''Dictionary of Classical Antiquities'' as well! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:04, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
279186 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279184 +++$+++ 279185 +++$+++ 2005-08-31 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.125542940E09 +++$+++ Yes milord, I will atone for my sins and cover my head with ashes ;-) And as further penance, I'll write the article on Smith's DGRG. Vale!  +++$+++ ::Yes milord, I will atone for my sins and cover my head with ashes ;-) And as further penance, I'll write the article on Smith's DGRG. Vale! [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 19:49, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

17041 +++$+++ Obamafan70 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17041 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-06 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.273200840E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to send some praise for your clean-up on the [[Bowl Championship Series]] article. Good work, and thanks for helping to keep it balanced and neutral.  +++$+++ I just wanted to send some praise for your clean-up on the [[Bowl Championship Series]] article. Good work, and thanks for helping to keep it balanced and neutral. [[User:Obamafan70|Obamafan70]] ([[User talk:Obamafan70|talk]]) 19:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
17042 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17041 +++$+++ 17041 +++$+++ 2010-05-06 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.273201320E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the kind words!  +++$+++ :Thank you for the kind words! [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 20:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

17043 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-12 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.273724580E09 +++$+++ I don't like any mention of a boobs zip code, and as the latest ip that was just reverted shows, it could use 6 for a lowercase b. Plus, sourcing it to the episode is inaccurate and [[WP:OR]] as Moe says it spells boobs, not saying which of the at least 3 it could be.  <font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ I don't like any mention of a boobs zip code, and as the latest ip that was just reverted shows, it could use 6 for a lowercase b. Plus, sourcing it to the episode is inaccurate and [[WP:OR]] as Moe says it spells boobs, not saying which of the at least 3 it could be.  <font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="#ffff00">J</font><font color="#009900">F</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]] [[User Talk:Ctjf83|chat]]</font> 21:23, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
17044 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17043 +++$+++ 17043 +++$+++ 2010-05-12 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.273724640E09 +++$+++ True. I am not thrilled about having \"BOOBS\" in the article, either, but I'm not sure we can completely ignore it, either, as per the Talk discussion.  +++$+++ :True. I am not thrilled about having "BOOBS" in the article, either, but I'm not sure we can completely ignore it, either, as per the Talk discussion. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 21:24, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
17045 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17043 +++$+++ 17044 +++$+++ 2010-05-12 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.273724880E09 +++$+++ Do you see why I'm saying OR? I think it is just a throw away joke, that can be ignored, actually, along with the other zip code mentioned, as that was just a brief 2 second mention. Unlike the area codes, which are the subject of an [[A Tale of Two Springfields|entire episode]].  <font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ ::Do you see why I'm saying OR? I think it is just a throw away joke, that can be ignored, actually, along with the other zip code mentioned, as that was just a brief 2 second mention. Unlike the area codes, which are the subject of an [[A Tale of Two Springfields|entire episode]].  <font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="#ffff00">J</font><font color="#009900">F</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]] [[User Talk:Ctjf83|chat]]</font> 21:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
17046 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17043 +++$+++ 17045 +++$+++ 2010-05-12 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.273725120E09 +++$+++ I don't consider citing dialogue or on-screen elements as OR. That said, I'm fine with removing the zip codes completely, as per the consensus to omit mention of contradictory location info.  +++$+++ :::I don't consider citing dialogue or on-screen elements as OR. That said, I'm fine with removing the zip codes completely, as per the consensus to omit mention of contradictory location info. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 21:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
17047 +++$+++ Ctjf83 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17043 +++$+++ 17046 +++$+++ 2010-05-12 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.273725180E09 +++$+++ Ok, we can remove them all together then. I only say OR as cause he said it spells boobs, but not how.  <font face=\"Kristen ITC\"> +++$+++ ::::Ok, we can remove them all together then. I only say OR as cause he said it spells boobs, but not how.  <font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="#ffff00">J</font><font color="#009900">F</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]] [[User Talk:Ctjf83|chat]]</font> 21:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
17048 +++$+++ Closettrekker +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17043 +++$+++ 17043 +++$+++ 2010-05-14 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.273847340E09 +++$+++ No it can only be two permutations for real cities, unless Springfield has a fictional Zip Code. 58008 and 60065 are the only two which match actual US cities. The later is a suburb of Chicago and is certainly the closest yet to a real Springfield.-- +++$+++ :No it can only be two permutations for real cities, unless Springfield has a fictional Zip Code. 58008 and 60065 are the only two which match actual US cities. The later is a suburb of Chicago and is certainly the closest yet to a real Springfield.--[[User:Closettrekker|Closettrekker]] ([[User talk:Closettrekker|talk]]) 07:29, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
17049 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17043 +++$+++ 17048 +++$+++ 2010-05-14 08:09:00 +++$+++ 1.273849740E09 +++$+++ No, it is no closer than any other clue to a \"real\" Springfield that we've seen in the show's 21 seasons. (In other words, just as meaningless.) And of course the zip code could be fictional; that goes without saying.  +++$+++ ::No, it is no closer than any other clue to a "real" Springfield that we've seen in the show's 21 seasons. (In other words, just as meaningless.) And of course the zip code could be fictional; that goes without saying. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 08:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

541332 +++$+++ Aymatth2 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-25 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.237971660E09 +++$+++ This one is bugging me. All villages deserve an article? [[Balmaclellan]] (pop. 500) does for sure. I played there as a child, so I put that into Wikipedia: nice place.  I could not find anything on Koljunak, but for some reason [[G\xf6lgelikonak]] seemed like it could be a Turkish equivalent. I started an article, but I think it is too far south. [[Kumbulak]] (pop. 20) is closer to Armenia, but obviously not the same place. I started an article anyway. [[Karabulak]] has the same sort of name structure, but seems to be a common name. The English Wikipedia lists Karabulaks in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Ingushetia, Chelyabinsk Oblast and two in Armenia. The Turkish Wikipedia gives two more entries for [http:\/\/tr.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Karabulak Karabulak], both in Turkey, and [http:\/\/maps.live.com\/default.aspx?v=2&cp=39.966667~43.533333&style=r&lvl=11&sp=Point.39.966667_43.533333_Kumbulak___ Live Search] has another, near the Armenian border. Karabulak may be the Turkic equivalent of [[Smithville]]. It strikes me that maybe we could save a lot of time by getting someone to build a tool that would scrape http:\/\/www.fallingrain.com and make a basic entry for all the registered places in the world. Any thoughts?  +++$+++ This one is bugging me. All villages deserve an article? [[Balmaclellan]] (pop. 500) does for sure. I played there as a child, so I put that into Wikipedia: nice place.  I could not find anything on Koljunak, but for some reason [[Gölgelikonak]] seemed like it could be a Turkish equivalent. I started an article, but I think it is too far south. [[Kumbulak]] (pop. 20) is closer to Armenia, but obviously not the same place. I started an article anyway. [[Karabulak]] has the same sort of name structure, but seems to be a common name. The English Wikipedia lists Karabulaks in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Ingushetia, Chelyabinsk Oblast and two in Armenia. The Turkish Wikipedia gives two more entries for [http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karabulak Karabulak], both in Turkey, and [http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=39.966667~43.533333&style=r&lvl=11&sp=Point.39.966667_43.533333_Kumbulak___ Live Search] has another, near the Armenian border. Karabulak may be the Turkic equivalent of [[Smithville]]. It strikes me that maybe we could save a lot of time by getting someone to build a tool that would scrape http://www.fallingrain.com and make a basic entry for all the registered places in the world. Any thoughts? [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 02:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
541333 +++$+++ Aymatth2 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541332 +++$+++ 541332 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.238017620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the response. I don't have the language skills to track this down. Three different languages\/alphabets! The name seems to be something like: K-vowel-L-vowel(s)-N-vowel-K where K could also be KH or G or GH. Koliunakh, Gul Junak ... far too many combinations. I think I have to leave it to the author to find the place, or it just gets scrubbed. I am guessing that by \"West Armenia\" he means eastern Turkey - another source of drama. I'm going to leave it - other more interesting topics. As for the bot concept, it looks as though the Turkish Wikipedia has used a bot to make entries for all places in Turkey. I suppose in the English version it is best to avoid areas in dispute. But I think a bot could handle duplicate names. One possibility is to make a sort of disambiguation page like [[Oda, Ghana]] holding the GEOnet information, and leave it to other editors to make individual pages. Thanks anyway,  +++$+++ *Thanks for the response. I don't have the language skills to track this down. Three different languages/alphabets! The name seems to be something like: K-vowel-L-vowel(s)-N-vowel-K where K could also be KH or G or GH. Koliunakh, Gul Junak ... far too many combinations. I think I have to leave it to the author to find the place, or it just gets scrubbed. I am guessing that by "West Armenia" he means eastern Turkey - another source of drama. I'm going to leave it - other more interesting topics. As for the bot concept, it looks as though the Turkish Wikipedia has used a bot to make entries for all places in Turkey. I suppose in the English version it is best to avoid areas in dispute. But I think a bot could handle duplicate names. One possibility is to make a sort of disambiguation page like [[Oda, Ghana]] holding the GEOnet information, and leave it to other editors to make individual pages. Thanks anyway, [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 14:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
541334 +++$+++ Aymatth2 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541332 +++$+++ 541333 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.238028780E09 +++$+++ Do I detect frustration or even despair? I think you are absolutely right in creating geo-stubs, even if it is tough to trace down even the basic facts. My guess is that a lot of people would not consider starting an article, but if they see one about a place they know, which is missing obvious (to them) facts, they may well be inspired to expand the article. You have sown the seed. But I am lazy and will probably continue to play with easy and uncontroversial subjects. Lately I have been following a sequence that began with a gorge in Mali, panned out to the broader geology of the region, panned in again to mining in southern Ghana, and may keep wandering from subject to related subject for quite a while before I get thrown onto another track by an AfD article.  +++$+++ :*Do I detect frustration or even despair? I think you are absolutely right in creating geo-stubs, even if it is tough to trace down even the basic facts. My guess is that a lot of people would not consider starting an article, but if they see one about a place they know, which is missing obvious (to them) facts, they may well be inspired to expand the article. You have sown the seed. But I am lazy and will probably continue to play with easy and uncontroversial subjects. Lately I have been following a sequence that began with a gorge in Mali, panned out to the broader geology of the region, panned in again to mining in southern Ghana, and may keep wandering from subject to related subject for quite a while before I get thrown onto another track by an AfD article. [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 17:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

279190 +++$+++ HappyCamper +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279190 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-03 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.125737100E09 +++$+++ ...starts off with the most hilarious statement about real and imaginary numbers and telephones. I have been laughing about it with my colleagues since I read it, and has become somewhat of an in-joke in the office. Thank you for the great humour! -- +++$+++ ...starts off with the most hilarious statement about real and imaginary numbers and telephones. I have been laughing about it with my colleagues since I read it, and has become somewhat of an in-joke in the office. Thank you for the great humour! --[[User:HappyCamper|HappyCamper]] 01:45, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
279191 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279190 +++$+++ 279190 +++$+++ 2005-09-03 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.125737460E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you like it. I wish I could say I made it up. It's and old joke ;-)  +++$+++ :I'm glad you like it. I wish I could say I made it up. It's and old joke ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 01:51, September 3, 2005 (UTC)

279192 +++$+++ Angr +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-03 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.125800580E09 +++$+++ The problem is the term \"Gaul\" is rather vague. Today it's usually understood to mean speakers of Gaulish, i.e. the Celts of what is now France, Switzerland, and northern Italy, but the Greeks and Romans called the Galatians Gauls too. It's clear the Galatians were Celts and that they moved from Thrace to Asia Minor during the historical period, but no one really knows how closely related they were to the Gauls of Gaul. Their language is way too sparsely attested to say whether it was particularly closely related to Gaulish. I think it's important to mention that the Galatians were called Gauls in the [[Attalus I]] article because of the reference to the [[Dying Gaul]] (always known as such even though he's apparently actually a Galatian) and because section 2 of the article is called \"Defeat of the Gauls\" and makes reference to \"Galatian Gauls\" and even simply \"Gauls\" in the quote. I wouldn't say calling the Galatians \"Gauls\" is definitely a misnomer, but it might be; we just don't know enough about the ethnolinguistic groupings among the Continental Celts to be sure. The Greeks and Romans considered them Gauls, and maybe they were right, but maybe they weren't. If you think my edit disrupts the flow, maybe you can change that sentence back to what you had, but then add a sentence in section 2 explaining that the people in question were the Galatians but that contemporary sources called them Gauls. -- +++$+++ The problem is the term "Gaul" is rather vague. Today it's usually understood to mean speakers of Gaulish, i.e. the Celts of what is now France, Switzerland, and northern Italy, but the Greeks and Romans called the Galatians Gauls too. It's clear the Galatians were Celts and that they moved from Thrace to Asia Minor during the historical period, but no one really knows how closely related they were to the Gauls of Gaul. Their language is way too sparsely attested to say whether it was particularly closely related to Gaulish. I think it's important to mention that the Galatians were called Gauls in the [[Attalus I]] article because of the reference to the [[Dying Gaul]] (always known as such even though he's apparently actually a Galatian) and because section 2 of the article is called "Defeat of the Gauls" and makes reference to "Galatian Gauls" and even simply "Gauls" in the quote. I wouldn't say calling the Galatians "Gauls" is definitely a misnomer, but it might be; we just don't know enough about the ethnolinguistic groupings among the Continental Celts to be sure. The Greeks and Romans considered them Gauls, and maybe they were right, but maybe they weren't. If you think my edit disrupts the flow, maybe you can change that sentence back to what you had, but then add a sentence in section 2 explaining that the people in question were the Galatians but that contemporary sources called them Gauls. --[[User:Angr|Angr]]/[[User_talk:Angr|<sub>{{IPA|tɔk tə mi}}</sub>]] 19:23, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
279193 +++$+++ Angr +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279192 +++$+++ 279192 +++$+++ 2005-09-04 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.125889380E09 +++$+++ That looks pretty good. It might be worth pointing out that the Greek word here translated \"Gauls\" is {{polytonic|\u0393\u03b1\u03bb\u03ac\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9}}. -- +++$+++ :That looks pretty good. It might be worth pointing out that the Greek word here translated "Gauls" is {{polytonic|Γαλάται}}. --[[User:Angr|Angr]]/[[User_talk:Angr|<sub>{{IPA|tɔk tə mi}}</sub>]] 20:03, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

17050 +++$+++ Mark Shaw +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-15 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.273915200E09 +++$+++ I found [http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/world\/2003\/aug\/01\/film.russia this], which indicates 1958. Do you have a more reliable source? Not being contentious; at this point I'm honestly curious.  +++$+++ I found [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/aug/01/film.russia this], which indicates 1958. Do you have a more reliable source? Not being contentious; at this point I'm honestly curious. [[User:Mark Shaw|Mark Shaw]] ([[User talk:Mark Shaw|talk]]) 02:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
17051 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17050 +++$+++ 17050 +++$+++ 2010-05-15 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.273917420E09 +++$+++ I believe the reason the news articles on the Wayne-Khruschev meeting say 1958 is because a [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=qqatDJRg1NYC&lpg=PA195&ots=eAsGTtJv8h&dq=khrushchev%20stalin%20%22john%20wayne%22&pg=PA193#v=onepage&q=khrushchev%20stalin%20%22john%20wayne%22&f=false 2005 Wayne biography] gives the wrong year. The book cites the meeting as occuring during the Hollywood dinner for Khruschev hosted by 20th Century Fox head [[Spyros Skouras]] that the Time article mentions. The 1959 visit was Khruschev's first (and, I believe, only) visit to the United States, and the first by any Soviet leader, which is why it got so much publicity.  +++$+++ :I believe the reason the news articles on the Wayne-Khruschev meeting say 1958 is because a [http://books.google.com/books?id=qqatDJRg1NYC&lpg=PA195&ots=eAsGTtJv8h&dq=khrushchev%20stalin%20%22john%20wayne%22&pg=PA193#v=onepage&q=khrushchev%20stalin%20%22john%20wayne%22&f=false 2005 Wayne biography] gives the wrong year. The book cites the meeting as occuring during the Hollywood dinner for Khruschev hosted by 20th Century Fox head [[Spyros Skouras]] that the Time article mentions. The 1959 visit was Khruschev's first (and, I believe, only) visit to the United States, and the first by any Soviet leader, which is why it got so much publicity. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 02:57, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

279195 +++$+++ OCNative +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279195 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-04 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.125828720E09 +++$+++ Paul, you don't need to revert the anons.  I was watching KCAL 9 News in Los Angeles, and they state a Supreme Court spokesperson announced Rehnquist's death.  +++$+++ Paul, you don't need to revert the anons.  I was watching KCAL 9 News in Los Angeles, and they state a Supreme Court spokesperson announced Rehnquist's death. [[User:OCNative|OCNative]] 03:12, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
279196 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279195 +++$+++ 279195 +++$+++ 2005-09-04 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.125828780E09 +++$+++ ok thanks. I looked around but could not find any confirmation.  +++$+++ :ok thanks. I looked around but could not find any confirmation. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:13, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

17053 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-17 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.276825380E09 +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice -->  +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 18:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
17054 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17053 +++$+++ 17053 +++$+++ 2010-07-05 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.278398340E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia requires \"[[WP:V|verifiability, not truth]]\". I know that sounds strange, but it's for Wikipedia's own protection. This means that only things that can be [[WP:RS|reliably sourced]] to a newspaper, a book, or something similar, can appear in articles; otherwise anyone could add anything by claiming that (despite all the reliable sources that say otherwise) Hurricane Katrina hit Miami, not New Orleans, in 2005, and that he knows this because he was in Miami. What you need to do is to find a reliable source that supports your claim, and then we can proceed from there. Until then, sorry, we need to stick with ''The New York Times''.  +++$+++ :Wikipedia requires "[[WP:V|verifiability, not truth]]". I know that sounds strange, but it's for Wikipedia's own protection. This means that only things that can be [[WP:RS|reliably sourced]] to a newspaper, a book, or something similar, can appear in articles; otherwise anyone could add anything by claiming that (despite all the reliable sources that say otherwise) Hurricane Katrina hit Miami, not New Orleans, in 2005, and that he knows this because he was in Miami. What you need to do is to find a reliable source that supports your claim, and then we can proceed from there. Until then, sorry, we need to stick with ''The New York Times''. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 23:39, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
17055 +++$+++ Gabrysb +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17053 +++$+++ 17053 +++$+++ 2010-07-06 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.278480900E09 +++$+++ Just for a record - Andy's information are accurate and NYT are not. Not the first time journalist missreported. At least there will be truth on talk page :)  +++$+++ :Just for a record - Andy's information are accurate and NYT are not. Not the first time journalist missreported. At least there will be truth on talk page :) [[User:Gabrysb|Gabrysb]] ([[User talk:Gabrysb|talk]]) 22:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
17056 +++$+++ Gabrysb +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17053 +++$+++ 17053 +++$+++ 2010-07-06 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.278481500E09 +++$+++ Also - a question, if I can, and if you know an answer. How can one \"realiably source\" that a newspaper was wrong? I suppose that in situation like this it would be better to remove content that is inaccurate, I think Wikipedia was not designed to mirror newspaper archives... What's also important - Andy did not add new information (for which he could not give realiable source).  +++$+++ :Also - a question, if I can, and if you know an answer. How can one "realiably source" that a newspaper was wrong? I suppose that in situation like this it would be better to remove content that is inaccurate, I think Wikipedia was not designed to mirror newspaper archives... What's also important - Andy did not add new information (for which he could not give realiable source). [[User:Gabrysb|Gabrysb]] ([[User talk:Gabrysb|talk]]) 22:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
17057 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17053 +++$+++ 17056 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.278499200E09 +++$+++ The only thing I can suggest is for you and Andy to bring this issue up on the [[Talk:Isner\u2013Mahut match at the 2010 Wimbledon Championships|Talk page for the article]]. Explain that Andy works on wimbledon.org (and\/or whatever your own connection to the match is), and that the ''New York Times'' article isn't correct. While the requirement for a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] that supports what you and Andy say can't be avoided, perhaps others can help you find such a source. (Also, since Andy works at wimbledon.org, perhaps he can have that Website publish an article explaining the correct details of the various scoreboards and their failures?)  +++$+++ ::The only thing I can suggest is for you and Andy to bring this issue up on the [[Talk:Isner–Mahut match at the 2010 Wimbledon Championships|Talk page for the article]]. Explain that Andy works on wimbledon.org (and/or whatever your own connection to the match is), and that the ''New York Times'' article isn't correct. While the requirement for a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] that supports what you and Andy say can't be avoided, perhaps others can help you find such a source. (Also, since Andy works at wimbledon.org, perhaps he can have that Website publish an article explaining the correct details of the various scoreboards and their failures?) [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 03:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
17058 +++$+++ Gabrysb +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17053 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.278532020E09 +++$+++ And FYI - I was the one who wrote \"hotfix\"... but I suppose I cannot be a source.  +++$+++ ::::And FYI - I was the one who wrote "hotfix"... but I suppose I cannot be a source. [[User:Gabrysb|Gabrysb]] ([[User talk:Gabrysb|talk]]) 12:47, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

541343 +++$+++ Marek69 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-31 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.238554860E09 +++$+++ Hi Carlossuarez46, I've left a response to your message on [[User_talk:Marek69#Question|my talk page]] --  +++$+++ Hi Carlossuarez46, I've left a response to your message on [[User_talk:Marek69#Question|my talk page]] -- [[User:Marek69|{{#if:|<span style="background-color:Marek;color:DarkBlue;"></span>|<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Marek</span>}}<small>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:.69;color:Blue;"></span>|<span style="color:Blue;">.69</span>}}</small>]][[User_talk:Marek69|<small>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:<sup>'' talk''</sup>;color:Green;"></span>|<span style="color:Green;"><sup>'' talk''</sup></span>}}</small>]] 20:01, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
541344 +++$+++ Marek69 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541343 +++$+++ 541343 +++$+++ 2009-03-31 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.238555100E09 +++$+++ Another reply on [[User_talk:Marek69#Question|my talk page]]  +++$+++ :Another reply on [[User_talk:Marek69#Question|my talk page]] [[User:Marek69|{{#if:|<span style="background-color:Marek;color:DarkBlue;"></span>|<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Marek</span>}}<small>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:.69;color:Blue;"></span>|<span style="color:Blue;">.69</span>}}</small>]][[User_talk:Marek69|<small>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:<sup>'' talk''</sup>;color:Green;"></span>|<span style="color:Green;"><sup>'' talk''</sup></span>}}</small>]] 20:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

279200 +++$+++ Wiki brah +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279200 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-11 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.126440180E09 +++$+++ Why do you keep deleting my New York article?  You are from Boston you should know this stuff yourself.  And I have this Request for Comment too what is the problem?? +++$+++ Why do you keep deleting my New York article?  You are from Boston you should know this stuff yourself.  And I have this Request for Comment too what is the problem??[[User:Wiki brah|Wiki brah]] 05:03, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
279201 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279200 +++$+++ 279200 +++$+++ 2005-09-11 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.126440420E09 +++$+++ Are you serious?  +++$+++ :Are you serious? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:07, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
279202 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279200 +++$+++ 279200 +++$+++ 2005-09-11 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.126441020E09 +++$+++ Read [[WP:NOR]].  +++$+++ :Read [[WP:NOR]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:17, September 11, 2005 (UTC)

614512 +++$+++ Moriori +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614512 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.152261600E09 +++$+++ Daniel, I have placed the article on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]] so that we can get the opinion of others regarding this.  +++$+++ Daniel, I have placed the article on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]] so that we can get the opinion of others regarding this. [[User:Moriori|Moriori]] 01:40, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
614513 +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614512 +++$+++ 614512 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.152269820E09 +++$+++ I've emailed Guitar world, hopefully someone will get back to me about permission -- +++$+++ :I've emailed Guitar world, hopefully someone will get back to me about permission --[[User:Daniel Olsen|Daniel Olsen]] 03:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
614514 +++$+++ Moriori +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614512 +++$+++ 614513 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.152271500E09 +++$+++ Daniel, copyvio is only part of the problem. Have you visited the entry for Guitar World's 100 greatest guitar solos at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]] yet? If not, you need to give your opinion fairly quickly.  +++$+++ ::Daniel, copyvio is only part of the problem. Have you visited the entry for Guitar World's 100 greatest guitar solos at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]] yet? If not, you need to give your opinion fairly quickly. [[User:Moriori|Moriori]] 04:25, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

17060 +++$+++ Trackinfo +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17060 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-19 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.279541700E09 +++$+++ The plot description you reverted was not entirely bad.  Yes, the guy couldn't spell and had serious phraseology issues, but several of the points you omitted leaves the plot details a little thin.  The popping zit is particularly bland in its revised state.  Referring to name characters \"Professor Jennings\" is preferable to \"a professor.\"  Mentioning that he is played by Donald Sutherland is appropriate, just as the mention of Belushi earlier would be.  Referring to Otto as \"the Delta\" just lays there.  In short, there is some value to these edits.  This could be improved upon, not just reverted and disappeared.  +++$+++ The plot description you reverted was not entirely bad.  Yes, the guy couldn't spell and had serious phraseology issues, but several of the points you omitted leaves the plot details a little thin.  The popping zit is particularly bland in its revised state.  Referring to name characters "Professor Jennings" is preferable to "a professor."  Mentioning that he is played by Donald Sutherland is appropriate, just as the mention of Belushi earlier would be.  Referring to Otto as "the Delta" just lays there.  In short, there is some value to these edits.  This could be improved upon, not just reverted and disappeared. [[User:Trackinfo|Trackinfo]] ([[User talk:Trackinfo|talk]]) 05:15, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
17061 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17060 +++$+++ 17060 +++$+++ 2010-07-19 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.279543500E09 +++$+++ The zit issue is slightly different. Wikipedia's [[WP:TONE|house style]] requires a clinical approach to writing for it that is as stripped bare as possible while still accurate and complete. The humor within the subject matter here makes it all the more important that the tone be retained and any deviance be either marked as such (such as the notable quotes, integrated into the text but clearly marked as such) or otherwise separated out (footnotes, for example). Can Bluto firing mashed potatoes into Marmalard be succinctly described while adhering to the tone? Perhaps. Is the incident important enough to do so in the plot summary? Or, in other words, is it as important as the resulting food fight? I don't think so.  +++$+++ :The zit issue is slightly different. Wikipedia's [[WP:TONE|house style]] requires a clinical approach to writing for it that is as stripped bare as possible while still accurate and complete. The humor within the subject matter here makes it all the more important that the tone be retained and any deviance be either marked as such (such as the notable quotes, integrated into the text but clearly marked as such) or otherwise separated out (footnotes, for example). Can Bluto firing mashed potatoes into Marmalard be succinctly described while adhering to the tone? Perhaps. Is the incident important enough to do so in the plot summary? Or, in other words, is it as important as the resulting food fight? I don't think so. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 05:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

17062 +++$+++ WickerGuy +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-28 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.280384820E09 +++$+++ You are formally correct that \"strange goings-on\" is not really good tone for a WP article re 2001. However, it is a direct quote from the dialogue of the film. An alternative clean-up would have been to put it in quotes indicating as such. However, I am satisfied with the way it stands.-- +++$+++ You are formally correct that "strange goings-on" is not really good tone for a WP article re 2001. However, it is a direct quote from the dialogue of the film. An alternative clean-up would have been to put it in quotes indicating as such. However, I am satisfied with the way it stands.--[[User:WickerGuy|WickerGuy]] ([[User talk:WickerGuy|talk]]) 23:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
17063 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17062 +++$+++ 17062 +++$+++ 2010-07-28 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.280385120E09 +++$+++ Just rechecked the film; the phrase does not occur in the scene.  +++$+++ :Just rechecked the film; the phrase does not occur in the scene. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 23:32, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

541351 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-10 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.239423540E09 +++$+++ Would you please look at recent attacks on my talk p. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&oldid=283053230] and earlier from the same source and do the appropriate.  ''' +++$+++ Would you please look at recent attacks on my talk p. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&oldid=283053230] and earlier from the same source and do the appropriate.  '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 21:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
541352 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541351 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.239423900E09 +++$+++ I see Chillum already blocked. so there's nothing to do more.  ''' +++$+++ :::I see Chillum already blocked. so there's nothing to do more.  '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 21:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

17067 +++$+++ Eustress +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-03 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.280882100E09 +++$+++ About [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=S.C._Johnson_Graduate_School_of_Management&action=historysubmit&diff=376970661&oldid=376958608 your edit], since \"business school\" is spelled out in the preceding phrase, I believe it is appropriate to abbreviate the verbiage in this case. Spelling it out is redundant and makes the dab very lengthy. Also [[b-school]] is a common abbreviation. Will you reconsider? \u2014''''' +++$+++ About [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=S.C._Johnson_Graduate_School_of_Management&action=historysubmit&diff=376970661&oldid=376958608 your edit], since "business school" is spelled out in the preceding phrase, I believe it is appropriate to abbreviate the verbiage in this case. Spelling it out is redundant and makes the dab very lengthy. Also [[b-school]] is a common abbreviation. Will you reconsider? —'''''[[User:Eustress|Eustress]]''''' <sup>''[[User talk:Eustress|talk]]''</sup> 17:35, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
17068 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17067 +++$+++ 17067 +++$+++ 2010-08-03 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.280894520E09 +++$+++ No. It's slang, just like \"j-school\" would be in an article about a university's journalism school, or calling Harvard \"H-bomb\". You are right that repeating \"school\" three times in the hatnote is not ideal, but resorting to slang is not the way to avoid the awkwardness.  +++$+++ :No. It's slang, just like "j-school" would be in an article about a university's journalism school, or calling Harvard "H-bomb". You are right that repeating "school" three times in the hatnote is not ideal, but resorting to slang is not the way to avoid the awkwardness. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 21:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
17069 +++$+++ Eustress +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17067 +++$+++ 17068 +++$+++ 2010-08-03 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.280895900E09 +++$+++ I like your compromise. It's even more clear and accurate now. Thanks! \u2014''''' +++$+++ ::I like your compromise. It's even more clear and accurate now. Thanks! —'''''[[User:Eustress|Eustress]]''''' <sup>''[[User talk:Eustress|talk]]''</sup> 21:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

279213 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-14 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.126751460E09 +++$+++ Ed Poor agreed in private discussion to resign as a bureaucrat. This resolution was based on our perception that he had lost touch with community consensus. He remains a Wikipedia administrator and a valued member of the community. Saving face was one consideration.  +++$+++ Ed Poor agreed in private discussion to resign as a bureaucrat. This resolution was based on our perception that he had lost touch with community consensus. He remains a Wikipedia administrator and a valued member of the community. Saving face was one consideration. [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 19:31, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
279214 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279213 +++$+++ 279213 +++$+++ 2005-09-14 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.126752900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for replying. I don't want anyone to lose face, but I still have some concerns about the process. From Raul's remarks it seems as if this had all been discussed and decided some time ago via IRC and mailing list discussions, (which unfortunately I don't have access to) before the case was even officially accepted. Is that true?  +++$+++ :Thanks for replying. I don't want anyone to lose face, but I still have some concerns about the process. From Raul's remarks it seems as if this had all been discussed and decided some time ago via IRC and mailing list discussions, (which unfortunately I don't have access to) before the case was even officially accepted. Is that true? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:55, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
279215 +++$+++ Theresa knott +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279213 +++$+++ 279214 +++$+++ 2005-09-14 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.126754460E09 +++$+++ The the arbitrators discussed on the mailing list about the best way to procceed and it was at that point that we decided to ask for his resignation of  bureaucrat powers. Which he readily gave.  +++$+++ ::The the arbitrators discussed on the mailing list about the best way to procceed and it was at that point that we decided to ask for his resignation of  bureaucrat powers. Which he readily gave. [[User:Theresa knott|Theresa Knott]] [[User talk:Theresa knott| (a tenth stroke)]] 20:21, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

17070 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-12 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.281603300E09 +++$+++ In response to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Springfield_(The_Simpsons)&curid=88235&diff=378390128&oldid=378386776 this comment], you could try asking an admin (ie. [[User:Theleftorium|Theleftorium]]) to add a copy of the page to your user space, then you can get whatever you need from there. --  +++$+++ In response to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Springfield_(The_Simpsons)&curid=88235&diff=378390128&oldid=378386776 this comment], you could try asking an admin (ie. [[User:Theleftorium|Theleftorium]]) to add a copy of the page to your user space, then you can get whatever you need from there. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|<font color="#FF8C00">Scorpion</font>]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|<font color="black">0422</font>]]</sup> 01:55, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
17071 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17070 +++$+++ 17070 +++$+++ 2010-08-12 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.281603660E09 +++$+++ It's not so much getting content from the article that I'm interested in but the article itself. Like [[politics in The Simpsons|politics]], [[religion in The Simpsons|religion]], and [[media in The Simpsons|the media]], education seems to me to justify a separate article beyond just [[Springfield (The Simpsons)|Springfield]] and [[Springfield Elementary School]].  +++$+++ :It's not so much getting content from the article that I'm interested in but the article itself. Like [[politics in The Simpsons|politics]], [[religion in The Simpsons|religion]], and [[media in The Simpsons|the media]], education seems to me to justify a separate article beyond just [[Springfield (The Simpsons)|Springfield]] and [[Springfield Elementary School]]. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 02:01, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
17072 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17070 +++$+++ 17071 +++$+++ 2010-08-12 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.281604740E09 +++$+++ Well, that was my thought when I created the page. But, it ended up just being a big list of schools and character alma mater, and it didn't seem like there was a lot of meaningful content that could be added. --  +++$+++ ::Well, that was my thought when I created the page. But, it ended up just being a big list of schools and character alma mater, and it didn't seem like there was a lot of meaningful content that could be added. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|<font color="#FF8C00">Scorpion</font>]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|<font color="black">0422</font>]]</sup> 02:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

541359 +++$+++ PMDrive1061 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541359 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-14 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.239773700E09 +++$+++ I noticed those little stubs you've been doing about those Butte County townsites.  Very cool!  I have to admit that I've never heard of any of them, but that doesn't make them any less interesting.  I did a couple of SoCal desert townsite articles, namely [[Earp, California]], [[Vidal Junction, California]] and [[Rice, California]], so I can relate to what you're doing.  Keep it up!  :)  -- +++$+++ I noticed those little stubs you've been doing about those Butte County townsites.  Very cool!  I have to admit that I've never heard of any of them, but that doesn't make them any less interesting.  I did a couple of SoCal desert townsite articles, namely [[Earp, California]], [[Vidal Junction, California]] and [[Rice, California]], so I can relate to what you're doing.  Keep it up!  :)  --[[User:PMDrive1061|PMDrive1061]] ([[User talk:PMDrive1061|talk]]) 22:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
541360 +++$+++ PMDrive1061 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541359 +++$+++ 541359 +++$+++ 2009-04-14 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.239774600E09 +++$+++ Hear, hear.  I remember deleting similar articles early in my administrative \"career\" which belonged to an established user who had every intention of fixing them later.  Hoo boy, did the trout leave a mark on the side of my face that day!  There are quite a few similar townsites and railroad sidings in the Mojave and Colorado deserts, especially along old US 66.  Not all of them have articles, but they should IMO.  If you really want to laugh, I remember either creating or expanding the article about [[North Shore, California]] only to have it tagged as a speedy for being a non-existent place!  Funny thing, since I've been there before.  No one told me I was standing in a non-existent town...!  -- +++$+++ *Hear, hear.  I remember deleting similar articles early in my administrative "career" which belonged to an established user who had every intention of fixing them later.  Hoo boy, did the trout leave a mark on the side of my face that day!  There are quite a few similar townsites and railroad sidings in the Mojave and Colorado deserts, especially along old US 66.  Not all of them have articles, but they should IMO.  If you really want to laugh, I remember either creating or expanding the article about [[North Shore, California]] only to have it tagged as a speedy for being a non-existent place!  Funny thing, since I've been there before.  No one told me I was standing in a non-existent town...!  --[[User:PMDrive1061|PMDrive1061]] ([[User talk:PMDrive1061|talk]]) 22:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

279216 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279216 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-15 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.126769280E09 +++$+++ Paul. Thanks for helping with the vandalism at [[Fruit]]. Not sure if you have been following, but please check out the \"conversation\" at [[Talk:Fruit#Stupid Fruit Facts]] with that anon you rolled back. He has been persisting in deleting a statement he just does not like (and will not correct it if it is wrong). When I advise him (on talk pages; he uses at least three different IP addresses) that one cannot just delete facts that are true because of a POV, he attacks me. I did not enter the \"offending\" fact, and his responses seem irrational. His ISP is from somewhere in the San Francisco Bay Area, so his accusations that I am some kind of typical Eurobashing, \"racist\" American are a real mystery (since he knows nothing about my sex, race, politics, nationality).  I finally blocked him on one ISP after warnings, but his\/her responses to discussing why he cannot do what he wants seem way over the wall. I'm unclear where I have insulted anybody (especially the Portuguese]].  He seems to actually just want to pick a fight. -  +++$+++ Paul. Thanks for helping with the vandalism at [[Fruit]]. Not sure if you have been following, but please check out the "conversation" at [[Talk:Fruit#Stupid Fruit Facts]] with that anon you rolled back. He has been persisting in deleting a statement he just does not like (and will not correct it if it is wrong). When I advise him (on talk pages; he uses at least three different IP addresses) that one cannot just delete facts that are true because of a POV, he attacks me. I did not enter the "offending" fact, and his responses seem irrational. His ISP is from somewhere in the San Francisco Bay Area, so his accusations that I am some kind of typical Eurobashing, "racist" American are a real mystery (since he knows nothing about my sex, race, politics, nationality).  I finally blocked him on one ISP after warnings, but his/her responses to discussing why he cannot do what he wants seem way over the wall. I'm unclear where I have insulted anybody (especially the Portuguese]].  He seems to actually just want to pick a fight. - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 00:28, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
279217 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279216 +++$+++ 279216 +++$+++ 2005-09-17 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.126994760E09 +++$+++ I was just on RC patrol, when I saw that, and reverted it. While the anon's behavior has been less than ideal, he may have a point about the carrot jam thing. When I read the lead, as it was when the anon made that edit, I thought it sounded a bit odd. I thought that while remarking on the difference between culinary and botanical usage in the lead was appropriate, detailing those differences didn't belong there. Now I see that they have been moved to their own section. That seems better to me. He also seemed to think that the statement was misleading in that while the Europeans or Portuguese classify carrot jam in the same category as fruit jam, it incorrectly implied that they consider carrot as a fruit. I would also guess that he objected to what could be seen as political overtones (i.e. POV) in asserting that the reason for the European trade rules are because of higher tax rates and because carrot jam is popular in Portugal. Anyway I think thew new section is much better and more NPOV.  +++$+++ :I was just on RC patrol, when I saw that, and reverted it. While the anon's behavior has been less than ideal, he may have a point about the carrot jam thing. When I read the lead, as it was when the anon made that edit, I thought it sounded a bit odd. I thought that while remarking on the difference between culinary and botanical usage in the lead was appropriate, detailing those differences didn't belong there. Now I see that they have been moved to their own section. That seems better to me. He also seemed to think that the statement was misleading in that while the Europeans or Portuguese classify carrot jam in the same category as fruit jam, it incorrectly implied that they consider carrot as a fruit. I would also guess that he objected to what could be seen as political overtones (i.e. POV) in asserting that the reason for the European trade rules are because of higher tax rates and because carrot jam is popular in Portugal. Anyway I think thew new section is much better and more NPOV. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:06, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

17073 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17073 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-16 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.284676380E09 +++$+++ Was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Anakin_Skywalker&curid=28844727&diff=385181870&oldid=385168383 this] a misclick? The content has been cut and pasted to the merge target's talk page. \u2013 +++$+++ Was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anakin_Skywalker&curid=28844727&diff=385181870&oldid=385168383 this] a misclick? The content has been cut and pasted to the merge target's talk page. –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 15:33, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
17074 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17073 +++$+++ 17073 +++$+++ 2010-09-16 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.284676920E09 +++$+++ My apologies for that; no idea how it happened.  +++$+++ :My apologies for that; no idea how it happened. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 15:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
17075 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17073 +++$+++ 17074 +++$+++ 2010-09-16 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.284677100E09 +++$+++ Wandering mouse =] No problem. \u2013 +++$+++ ::Wandering mouse =] No problem. –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 15:45, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

279218 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-17 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.127005200E09 +++$+++ I agree completely.  As I said many times to the anon, I did not write that item.  I was never defending the item. I was concerned that deleting something that is factual because one does not like it was the wrong approach, at which point I was attacked as being anti-EU and anti-Portuguese, then a rabid American saber- ....well you can see how it degenerated.  I attempted to steer the anon to our various newbie and civility pages, but he just refused to really read anything I had to say, prefering instead to look for words he could use to have a fight.  My attitude is this. Wikipedia is a volunteer effort. No volunteer should put up with abusive language from another \"contributor\".  That is a problem that Wikipedians need to nip in the bud whenever it occurs.  It will drive good people away if verbal bullying prevails. Thanks for your comments -  +++$+++ I agree completely.  As I said many times to the anon, I did not write that item.  I was never defending the item. I was concerned that deleting something that is factual because one does not like it was the wrong approach, at which point I was attacked as being anti-EU and anti-Portuguese, then a rabid American saber- ....well you can see how it degenerated.  I attempted to steer the anon to our various newbie and civility pages, but he just refused to really read anything I had to say, prefering instead to look for words he could use to have a fight.  My attitude is this. Wikipedia is a volunteer effort. No volunteer should put up with abusive language from another "contributor".  That is a problem that Wikipedians need to nip in the bud whenever it occurs.  It will drive good people away if verbal bullying prevails. Thanks for your comments - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 18:00, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
279219 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279218 +++$+++ 279218 +++$+++ 2005-09-17 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.127006040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the thanks. I agree with your sentiments.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the thanks. I agree with your sentiments. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:14, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

279221 +++$+++ Rx StrangeLove +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-17 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.126957560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for removing that dup header, it kept coming and going. I finally walked away from it. I've seen that happen before, no sure why it acts like that. Later!  +++$+++ Thanks for removing that dup header, it kept coming and going. I finally walked away from it. I've seen that happen before, no sure why it acts like that. Later! [[User:Rx StrangeLove|Rx StrangeLove]] 04:46, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
279222 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279221 +++$+++ 279221 +++$+++ 2005-09-17 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.126994760E09 +++$+++ Glad to help out. The double header thing has happened to me before. When you add the closing header template <nowiki>{{subst:vt}}<\/nowiki> it gets added at the top of the page ''above the section heading'' for the article's AfD discussion page. And when you submit the edit, because of caching. and the fact that the discussion page is transcluded, the day page will not reflect the change immediately (you have to purge the server's cache to see your update). But if you re-edit the discussion page by clicking on the \"edit\" link for that article on the AfD day page, you will be doing a ''section'' edit for that discussion page which will only show what is in that section of the discussion page and thus won't show the AfD closing header you added ''above'' that section. So if you don't realize this (which I didn't) and you add another <nowiki>{{subst:vt}}<\/nowiki> at the top, it results in double headers. To see the entire discussion page including the newly added AfD closing header, you have to click on the edit link for the page on the AfD day page and 'then click on the \"edit this page\" tab at the top of the section editing page. I hope this is all makes sense ;-) And I apologize for the long explanation if you already know all this.   +++$+++ :Glad to help out. The double header thing has happened to me before. When you add the closing header template <nowiki>{{subst:vt}}</nowiki> it gets added at the top of the page ''above the section heading'' for the article's AfD discussion page. And when you submit the edit, because of caching. and the fact that the discussion page is transcluded, the day page will not reflect the change immediately (you have to purge the server's cache to see your update). But if you re-edit the discussion page by clicking on the "edit" link for that article on the AfD day page, you will be doing a ''section'' edit for that discussion page which will only show what is in that section of the discussion page and thus won't show the AfD closing header you added ''above'' that section. So if you don't realize this (which I didn't) and you add another <nowiki>{{subst:vt}}</nowiki> at the top, it results in double headers. To see the entire discussion page including the newly added AfD closing header, you have to click on the edit link for the page on the AfD day page and 'then click on the "edit this page" tab at the top of the section editing page. I hope this is all makes sense ;-) And I apologize for the long explanation if you already know all this.  [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:06, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
279223 +++$+++ Rx StrangeLove +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279221 +++$+++ 279222 +++$+++ 2005-09-20 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.127211660E09 +++$+++ That makes sense, I think I thought about clearing the cache while trying to troubleshoot but I don't have a specific memory of doing it so that was probably the case. Thanks for the note!  +++$+++ ::That makes sense, I think I thought about clearing the cache while trying to troubleshoot but I don't have a specific memory of doing it so that was probably the case. Thanks for the note! [[User:Rx StrangeLove|Rx StrangeLove]] 03:21, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
279224 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279221 +++$+++ 279221 +++$+++ 2005-09-19 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.127125380E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry your edit looked like vandalism to me. But you are going about your disambiguation in the wrong way, a copy and paste is not the correct way to rename a page since it does not preserve the page histories.  And it is not clear to me that you need a disambiguation page in the first place since Kush and Kusha aren't spelled the same.  +++$+++ :I'm sorry your edit looked like vandalism to me. But you are going about your disambiguation in the wrong way, a copy and paste is not the correct way to rename a page since it does not preserve the page histories.  And it is not clear to me that you need a disambiguation page in the first place since Kush and Kusha aren't spelled the same. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:23, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
279225 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279221 +++$+++ 279221 +++$+++ 2005-09-19 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.127126880E09 +++$+++ Yes you have to be logged in to rename a page see [[Help:Renaming (moving) a page]]. But you can request a rename here: [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]]. I would highly recommend registration it has lots of advantages see [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?]]. You can register here: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Userlogin] However renaming pages can be controversial, so it is always wise to discuss the propose rename on the associated page's talk page. If you have anymore questions feel free to ask.  +++$+++ :Yes you have to be logged in to rename a page see [[Help:Renaming (moving) a page]]. But you can request a rename here: [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]]. I would highly recommend registration it has lots of advantages see [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?]]. You can register here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Userlogin] However renaming pages can be controversial, so it is always wise to discuss the propose rename on the associated page's talk page. If you have anymore questions feel free to ask. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:48, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
279226 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279221 +++$+++ 279221 +++$+++ 2005-09-19 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.127170140E09 +++$+++ Yes I saw that just after I had left my message at your talk page. I was just reading through my dog-eared ''Inferno'' trying to figure out if we were done with '''VII'', and I was reading our article on [[Plutus]], (wondering if we should mention the probable connection with [[Pluto]], in Dante's mind at least? )  when I got the yellow \"You have new messages\" message ;-)  +++$+++ :Yes I saw that just after I had left my message at your talk page. I was just reading through my dog-eared ''Inferno'' trying to figure out if we were done with '''VII'', and I was reading our article on [[Plutus]], (wondering if we should mention the probable connection with [[Pluto]], in Dante's mind at least? )  when I got the yellow "You have new messages" message ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:49, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

541367 +++$+++ Themfromspace +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-17 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.240019280E09 +++$+++ I didn't believe that redirecting an article with nothing but [[WP:PLOT|plot summary]] and no citations to a list where he was mentioned was removal of information.  Please rethink your edit, as the rest of the minor characters are presented only in that list. ''' +++$+++ I didn't believe that redirecting an article with nothing but [[WP:PLOT|plot summary]] and no citations to a list where he was mentioned was removal of information.  Please rethink your edit, as the rest of the minor characters are presented only in that list. '''[[User:Themfromspace|<font color="blue">Them</font>]][[User talk:Themfromspace|<font color="red">From</font>]][[Special:Contributions/themfromspace|<font color="black">Space</font>]]''' 18:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
541368 +++$+++ Themfromspace +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541367 +++$+++ 541367 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.240019640E09 +++$+++ As Kingpin13 pointed out, I hadn't properly redirected the article.  I'll do so now, if you still have any problems with that feel free to contact me. ''' +++$+++ :As Kingpin13 pointed out, I hadn't properly redirected the article.  I'll do so now, if you still have any problems with that feel free to contact me. '''[[User:Themfromspace|<font color="blue">Them</font>]][[User talk:Themfromspace|<font color="red">From</font>]][[Special:Contributions/themfromspace|<font color="black">Space</font>]]''' 18:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

541370 +++$+++ Deskana +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-21 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.240302960E09 +++$+++ Please do not leave requests of for usage of the Oversight tool on public messageboards such as the incidents noticeboard. For more info on how to correctly make Oversight requests, see [[Wikipedia:Oversight]]. Thank you. -- +++$+++ Please do not leave requests of for usage of the Oversight tool on public messageboards such as the incidents noticeboard. For more info on how to correctly make Oversight requests, see [[Wikipedia:Oversight]]. Thank you. --[[User:Deskana|Deskana]], [[User talk:Deskana|Champion of the Frozen Wastes]] 01:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
541371 +++$+++ Deskana +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541370 +++$+++ 541370 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.240342140E09 +++$+++ I do apologise, I sent this message to the wrong person. I saw the thread on the incidents noticeboard, and when removing the thread in the edit window, looked for the first signature I could see in the thread, which was yours, marking the incident as resolved. I'll send the message to the right person now. -- +++$+++ :I do apologise, I sent this message to the wrong person. I saw the thread on the incidents noticeboard, and when removing the thread in the edit window, looked for the first signature I could see in the thread, which was yours, marking the incident as resolved. I'll send the message to the right person now. --[[User:Deskana|Deskana]], [[User talk:Deskana|Champion of the Frozen Wastes]] 12:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

279227 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279227 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-19 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.127165520E09 +++$+++ The silly I can live with; the malicious is harder. I really worry about the general mtone of 'conversation' in this place and the inconsistent application of sanctions. But I'm here on low-level activity for a while to see how it goes.  +++$+++ The silly I can live with; the malicious is harder. I really worry about the general mtone of 'conversation' in this place and the inconsistent application of sanctions. But I'm here on low-level activity for a while to see how it goes. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|Talk]] 14:32, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
279228 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279227 +++$+++ 279227 +++$+++ 2005-09-19 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.127170140E09 +++$+++ Yes malicious is not very delicious. I understand your concern about the \"inconsistent application of sanction\", as a perusal of my talk page above will tell you. In that regard, I should perhaps tell you that I have been taking your name in vain of late, in various places. See for example [[User talk:TheoClarke#The devil made me do it]]. I hope you don't mind too much. I also hope that none of my own contributions to the conversational tone have been negative. It is in my nature to always have worries on that score (I don't want to end up in the ''Eighth Circle, Sixth Pouch'') Anyway I am very glad to have the opportunity to work together again. And you should know that I am always available to lend a hand with anything which will help make Wikipedia a better place, for you and for all of us.  +++$+++ :Yes malicious is not very delicious. I understand your concern about the "inconsistent application of sanction", as a perusal of my talk page above will tell you. In that regard, I should perhaps tell you that I have been taking your name in vain of late, in various places. See for example [[User talk:TheoClarke#The devil made me do it]]. I hope you don't mind too much. I also hope that none of my own contributions to the conversational tone have been negative. It is in my nature to always have worries on that score (I don't want to end up in the ''Eighth Circle, Sixth Pouch'') Anyway I am very glad to have the opportunity to work together again. And you should know that I am always available to lend a hand with anything which will help make Wikipedia a better place, for you and for all of us. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:49, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
279229 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279227 +++$+++ 279228 +++$+++ 2005-09-20 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.127225400E09 +++$+++ I just hope that my anti-manifesto, as it were, didn't lead you into doing anything you now regret. I've found you to be one of the most considered \"conversationalists\" in this place; no need for you to worry about the ''cappe con cappucci bassi'', I think. The only thing one can do here really is to model the behaviour you expect from others and hope for the best.  +++$+++ ::I just hope that my anti-manifesto, as it were, didn't lead you into doing anything you now regret. I've found you to be one of the most considered "conversationalists" in this place; no need for you to worry about the ''cappe con cappucci bassi'', I think. The only thing one can do here really is to model the behaviour you expect from others and hope for the best. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|Talk]] 07:10, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
279230 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279227 +++$+++ 279229 +++$+++ 2005-09-20 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.127251020E09 +++$+++ No regrets ''so far''. And I hope you are right about the ''cappe'', I've never liked hoods all that much. By the way, perhaps I seem considered because I'm so slow, it helps sometimes not to be able to type (or think) too quickly. And concerning your last point, I agree &mdash; of all the advice and moral teachings I've ever heard, the Golden Rule has always seemed the best.  Of course sometimes silence is golden too. I have a harder time remembering that ;-)  +++$+++ :::No regrets ''so far''. And I hope you are right about the ''cappe'', I've never liked hoods all that much. By the way, perhaps I seem considered because I'm so slow, it helps sometimes not to be able to type (or think) too quickly. And concerning your last point, I agree &mdash; of all the advice and moral teachings I've ever heard, the Golden Rule has always seemed the best.  Of course sometimes silence is golden too. I have a harder time remembering that ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:17, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
279231 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279227 +++$+++ 279230 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.127312640E09 +++$+++ Note to self: remember to update status of Dante list on talk page if adding new canto!  +++$+++ ::::Note to self: remember to update status of Dante list on talk page if adding new canto! [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|Consensus is not achieved through voting]] 07:24, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
279232 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279227 +++$+++ 279231 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.127337960E09 +++$+++ No need to worry about updating the \"status\". You add content. I'll be happy to take care of silly little things like that. (By the way my edit summary of \"update again\" at [[Talk:List of cultural references in The Divine Comedy]] was a mild self-reproach for my having failed to update it correctly the time before!)  +++$+++ :::::No need to worry about updating the "status". You add content. I'll be happy to take care of silly little things like that. (By the way my edit summary of "update again" at [[Talk:List of cultural references in The Divine Comedy]] was a mild self-reproach for my having failed to update it correctly the time before!) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:26, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

541372 +++$+++ K8 fan +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541372 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-21 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.240310880E09 +++$+++ The article was a stub, but it already had a reference and, and this is the important bit, it was about him hosting a popular show on MTV for several years. That is notability beyond membership in a band. It would be helpful to read an article before deleting it.  +++$+++ The article was a stub, but it already had a reference and, and this is the important bit, it was about him hosting a popular show on MTV for several years. That is notability beyond membership in a band. It would be helpful to read an article before deleting it. [[User:K8 fan|K8 fan]] ([[User talk:K8 fan|talk]]) 03:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
541373 +++$+++ K8 fan +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541372 +++$+++ 541372 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.240311540E09 +++$+++ Wow, you are exactly the sort of editor who makes Wikipedia an unpleasant place. Now, I know you're going to delete this because, like most bullies, can't stand criticism.  +++$+++ : Wow, you are exactly the sort of editor who makes Wikipedia an unpleasant place. Now, I know you're going to delete this because, like most bullies, can't stand criticism. [[User:K8 fan|K8 fan]] ([[User talk:K8 fan|talk]]) 03:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
541374 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541372 +++$+++ 541373 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.240328940E09 +++$+++ It has now been listed at DRV.  +++$+++ ::It has now been listed at DRV. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 08:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

17087 +++$+++ Warfieldian +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-12 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.299917040E09 +++$+++ Hi, just wanted to let you know that I think you are right about focusing about not citing the release of the documents and audio and focusing on integrating it better in to the article.  Thanks for all the great edits and improvements to the article.  It is fascinating reading through some of the internal investigative reports about everything that happened and how the Secret Service responded.     +++$+++ Hi, just wanted to let you know that I think you are right about focusing about not citing the release of the documents and audio and focusing on integrating it better in to the article.  Thanks for all the great edits and improvements to the article.  It is fascinating reading through some of the internal investigative reports about everything that happened and how the Secret Service responded.    [[User:Warfieldian|Warfieldian]] ([[User talk:Warfieldian|talk]]) 00:04, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
17088 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17087 +++$+++ 17087 +++$+++ 2011-03-12 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.299918120E09 +++$+++ Thank you for bringing the documents to Wikipedia's attention.  +++$+++ :Thank you for bringing the documents to Wikipedia's attention. [[User:Ylee|YLee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 00:22, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

279233 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-21 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.127338020E09 +++$+++ Have you tried e-mailing Theo?  +++$+++ Have you tried e-mailing Theo? [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|The kettle's on]] 14:27, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
279234 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279233 +++$+++ 279233 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.127338260E09 +++$+++ Not yet. I was just thinking about it, though. I will soon, if he doesn't show.  +++$+++ :Not yet. I was just thinking about it, though. I will soon, if he doesn't show. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:31, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

17091 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-23 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.303598580E09 +++$+++ Hi - I'm not seeing where my edit of the hidden notes in [[Elizabeth Taylor]] mangled the text - could you point me to it?  Obviously, I didn't intend that - but do want to fix the notes that are there and add short one where they're missing so we can avoid the back and forth regarding the upper case U.  Thanks <strong> +++$+++ Hi - I'm not seeing where my edit of the hidden notes in [[Elizabeth Taylor]] mangled the text - could you point me to it?  Obviously, I didn't intend that - but do want to fix the notes that are there and add short one where they're missing so we can avoid the back and forth regarding the upper case U.  Thanks <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]]</strong>/<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 15:43, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
17092 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17091 +++$+++ 17091 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.303605000E09 +++$+++ Take another look at your edit; it completely removed some text, making a part of the summary nonsensical.  +++$+++ :Take another look at your edit; it completely removed some text, making a part of the summary nonsensical. [[User:Ylee|Ylee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 17:30, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
17093 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17091 +++$+++ 17092 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.303613040E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see what happened is that a hyphen dropped off of the arrow at the end of the hidden note, which screwed up the text.  Fixed it now - thanks. <strong> +++$+++ ::Ah, I see what happened is that a hyphen dropped off of the arrow at the end of the hidden note, which screwed up the text.  Fixed it now - thanks. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]]</strong>/<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 19:44, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

279236 +++$+++ DoomBringer +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-21 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.127350980E09 +++$+++ I see you reverted the edits on Computer Bugs.  The statement I removed was a version of the \"Fallacy of many eyes\".  It claims that just because more people have access to the code, it doesn't mean that those eyes are qualified.  Please do not put that statement back in, as it is pro open source and generally false.   +++$+++ I see you reverted the edits on Computer Bugs.  The statement I removed was a version of the "Fallacy of many eyes".  It claims that just because more people have access to the code, it doesn't mean that those eyes are qualified.  Please do not put that statement back in, as it is pro open source and generally false.  [[User:DoomBringer|DoomBringer]] 18:03, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
279237 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279236 +++$+++ 279236 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.127351580E09 +++$+++ DoomBringer is clearly on the wrong side of history, but he has a point; the passage was a bit POV, though of course the ''right'' POV. It could be reworded \"open-source advocates claim...\" or some such. BTW is there any substantiation to the claim that open-source has generally just as many bugs, or is it someone's subjective impression? -- +++$+++ :DoomBringer is clearly on the wrong side of history, but he has a point; the passage was a bit POV, though of course the ''right'' POV. It could be reworded "open-source advocates claim..." or some such. BTW is there any substantiation to the claim that open-source has generally just as many bugs, or is it someone's subjective impression? --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 18:13, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
279238 +++$+++ DoomBringer +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279236 +++$+++ 279237 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.127356620E09 +++$+++ I'm on the wrong side of history?  Sure, right, uh huh, Mr. Holier-Than-Thou-OSS-Zealot.  Seriously.  OSS has its place, but its not the single greatest thing in software engineering.  Anyhow, the claim that OSS has a roughly equivalent number of bugs to \"closed source\" is currently unsubstantiated in the current version of the article.  Given the religious war by zealots, objectivity in this area is well-nigh impossible.  I have to ask if that line is even relevant to the discussion of the whole thing.  We can safely assume that all software has bugs, open source or not.  +++$+++ ::I'm on the wrong side of history?  Sure, right, uh huh, Mr. Holier-Than-Thou-OSS-Zealot.  Seriously.  OSS has its place, but its not the single greatest thing in software engineering.  Anyhow, the claim that OSS has a roughly equivalent number of bugs to "closed source" is currently unsubstantiated in the current version of the article.  Given the religious war by zealots, objectivity in this area is well-nigh impossible.  I have to ask if that line is even relevant to the discussion of the whole thing.  We can safely assume that all software has bugs, open source or not. [[User:DoomBringer|DoomBringer]] 19:37, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
279239 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279236 +++$+++ 279236 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.127355120E09 +++$+++ DoomBringer: Sorry about my revert. I was on \"RC patrol\" (I like to do that while I'm watching TV, at the end of the day, when my brain is too tired to do anything more creative ;-) I reverted what looked like to me vandalism (i.e. unexplained removal of non-obviously bad text by an anon) I did not mean my edit to be taking a position on the accuracy or the POV of the text I restored. If that edit was yours then I apologize. However, as it happens, I don't necessarily agree that the removed text is inaccurate. Nor do I necessarily agree with your characterization of it. My 30 years of programming experience  tends to tell me otherwise. Calling something a \"Fallacy\" doesn't make it so. In my experience  open-source programmers are no-less qualified (in fact just the opposite). And while not taking into account how qualified the \"eyes\" are, ''may'' introduce a fallacy &mdash; not taken into account the orders of magnitude ''more'', eyes available in the open-source model, ''surely will'' ;-) BTW Travatore's suggestion would seem to deal with any POV concerns, don't you agree?  Regards &mdash;  +++$+++ :DoomBringer: Sorry about my revert. I was on "RC patrol" (I like to do that while I'm watching TV, at the end of the day, when my brain is too tired to do anything more creative ;-) I reverted what looked like to me vandalism (i.e. unexplained removal of non-obviously bad text by an anon) I did not mean my edit to be taking a position on the accuracy or the POV of the text I restored. If that edit was yours then I apologize. However, as it happens, I don't necessarily agree that the removed text is inaccurate. Nor do I necessarily agree with your characterization of it. My 30 years of programming experience  tends to tell me otherwise. Calling something a "Fallacy" doesn't make it so. In my experience  open-source programmers are no-less qualified (in fact just the opposite). And while not taking into account how qualified the "eyes" are, ''may'' introduce a fallacy &mdash; not taken into account the orders of magnitude ''more'', eyes available in the open-source model, ''surely will'' ;-) BTW Travatore's suggestion would seem to deal with any POV concerns, don't you agree?  Regards &mdash; [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:12, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
279240 +++$+++ DoomBringer +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279236 +++$+++ 279239 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.127356620E09 +++$+++ I wasn't logged in at the time.  I guess I forgot to.  I'm a computer professional too, and I think you're romanticizing open source software a bit.  Just like commercial software, quality is all over the board.  The \"many eyes\" argument is just a weak argument, as I said, what makes those eyes qualified? In commercial software, you pretty much have market forces demanding that the code you write is good.  Also, the many eyes argument fails for certain \"open\" source projects.  IIRC, Linus Torvalds has control over what goes into the Linux kernal, so if he had an agenda against a contributer (or whatever), those contributions could just fail to become part of the project, thus negating that pair of eyes from doing any good.  As for rectifying the article, I vote that the whole thing be removed.  Frankly, it isn't even relevant to the whole article.  All software has bugs.   +++$+++ :: I wasn't logged in at the time.  I guess I forgot to.  I'm a computer professional too, and I think you're romanticizing open source software a bit.  Just like commercial software, quality is all over the board.  The "many eyes" argument is just a weak argument, as I said, what makes those eyes qualified? In commercial software, you pretty much have market forces demanding that the code you write is good.  Also, the many eyes argument fails for certain "open" source projects.  IIRC, Linus Torvalds has control over what goes into the Linux kernal, so if he had an agenda against a contributer (or whatever), those contributions could just fail to become part of the project, thus negating that pair of eyes from doing any good.  As for rectifying the article, I vote that the whole thing be removed.  Frankly, it isn't even relevant to the whole article.  All software has bugs.  [[User:DoomBringer|DoomBringer]] 19:37, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
279241 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279236 +++$+++ 279236 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.127359260E09 +++$+++ Perhaps we should just agree to disagree on the virtues, or lack thereof, of the open-source model. Anyway I have no plans to edit that article, beyond the possible vandalism revert. BTW edit summaries are good ;-) if you had given a reason for your removing that text I would have passed it right by. Oh and one more thing, Travatore expressed the opinion that you are on the \"wrong side of history\", I don't see how that makes him a \"zealot\", and even if it does, I don't see how calling him one helps.  +++$+++ :Perhaps we should just agree to disagree on the virtues, or lack thereof, of the open-source model. Anyway I have no plans to edit that article, beyond the possible vandalism revert. BTW edit summaries are good ;-) if you had given a reason for your removing that text I would have passed it right by. Oh and one more thing, Travatore expressed the opinion that you are on the "wrong side of history", I don't see how that makes him a "zealot", and even if it does, I don't see how calling him one helps. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
279242 +++$+++ DoomBringer +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279236 +++$+++ 279241 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.127362140E09 +++$+++ He said I was on the wrong side of history, which I perceived as a slight against me.  Moreover, he claims that OSS is the \"right\" way to do things.  Sorry, but I have to point out his obvious bias in favor of the OSS model.  OSS isn't \"right\" or \"wrong,\" it just is a methodology that has its own merits and problems.  As it is, I'd rather not get into a debate over if it is a good methodology, because everyone in the debate is so empassioned over it that they fail to listen and instead act with hostility.  +++$+++ ::He said I was on the wrong side of history, which I perceived as a slight against me.  Moreover, he claims that OSS is the "right" way to do things.  Sorry, but I have to point out his obvious bias in favor of the OSS model.  OSS isn't "right" or "wrong," it just is a methodology that has its own merits and problems.  As it is, I'd rather not get into a debate over if it is a good methodology, because everyone in the debate is so empassioned over it that they fail to listen and instead act with hostility. [[User:DoomBringer|DoomBringer]] 21:09, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

614518 +++$+++ Budgiekiller +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614518 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-04 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.154755020E09 +++$+++ Cheers for that...!   +++$+++ Cheers for that...!  [[User:Budgiekiller|Budgiekiller]] 22:17, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
614519 +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614518 +++$+++ 614518 +++$+++ 2006-08-04 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.154755260E09 +++$+++ All in a day's work. -- +++$+++ :All in a day's work. --[[User:Daniel Olsen|Daniel Olsen]] 22:21, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
614520 +++$+++ Nickieee +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614518 +++$+++ 614518 +++$+++ 2006-08-13 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.155484740E09 +++$+++ It is against the rules to seek votes like the one above. You wrote, \"Keep and Clean Up. At the most basic level, this is not just a website, and thus the nomination has no basis. Whether this is a research institute, school, or whatever the hell else it may be, it deserves to have an article here.\" Shouldn't you know WHAT IT IS in order to decide IF IT IS NOTABLE? Please consider withdrawing your solicited vote by this user who's first ever edit was a keep vote on the AfD.  +++$+++ : It is against the rules to seek votes like the one above. You wrote, "Keep and Clean Up. At the most basic level, this is not just a website, and thus the nomination has no basis. Whether this is a research institute, school, or whatever the hell else it may be, it deserves to have an article here." Shouldn't you know WHAT IT IS in order to decide IF IT IS NOTABLE? Please consider withdrawing your solicited vote by this user who's first ever edit was a keep vote on the AfD. [[User:Nickieee|Nickieee]] 08:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

17094 +++$+++ Mysweetoldetc. +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17094 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-08 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.304912220E09 +++$+++ Would it be too much trouble to provide the ''page number'' from your source for the \"panties\" citation from Tedrow? If you have a collection of books on Chappy incident, perhaps you'll keep an eye on the edits and provide sources and citiations to confirm or revise mine. +++$+++ Would it be too much trouble to provide the ''page number'' from your source for the "panties" citation from Tedrow? If you have a collection of books on Chappy incident, perhaps you'll keep an eye on the edits and provide sources and citiations to confirm or revise mine.[[User:Mysweetoldetc.|Mysweetoldetc.]] ([[User talk:Mysweetoldetc.|talk]]) 20:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
17095 +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17094 +++$+++ 17094 +++$+++ 2011-05-08 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.304922900E09 +++$+++ Look at the cite again. It uses the rp template to specify the page, 36 in this case.  +++$+++ :Look at the cite again. It uses the rp template to specify the page, 36 in this case. [[User:Ylee|Ylee]] ([[User talk:Ylee#top|talk]]) 23:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
17096 +++$+++ Mysweetoldetc. +++$+++ Ylee +++$+++ 17094 +++$+++ 17095 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.305011940E09 +++$+++ Got it.  +++$+++ ::Got it. [[User:Mysweetoldetc.|Mysweetoldetc.]] ([[User talk:Mysweetoldetc.|talk]]) 00:19, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
17097 +++$+++ Shijualex +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17094 +++$+++ 17094 +++$+++ 2011-03-22 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.300837920E09 +++$+++ Hi, Saw your message on my Malayalam wikipedia user talk page. What type of help you expect from me. You can mail me at shijualexonlineATgmailDOTcom -- +++$+++ :Hi, Saw your message on my Malayalam wikipedia user talk page. What type of help you expect from me. You can mail me at shijualexonlineATgmailDOTcom --[[User:Shijualex|Shijualex]] ([[User talk:Shijualex|talk]]) 16:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

279243 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-21 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.127354280E09 +++$+++ Any more thoughts on [[:Template:Ent]]? -- +++$+++ Any more thoughts on [[:Template:Ent]]? --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 18:58, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
279244 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.127362560E09 +++$+++ Unless you're using a Mac, I'd expect you to have access either to Netscape 7 or Mozilla 1.7.x; the problem shows up in both. Are you saying you've tried [[Euler's identity]] in one of those browsers and ''don't'' see the problem? -- +++$+++ ::Unless you're using a Mac, I'd expect you to have access either to Netscape 7 or Mozilla 1.7.x; the problem shows up in both. Are you saying you've tried [[Euler's identity]] in one of those browsers and ''don't'' see the problem? --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 21:16, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
279245 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.127389080E09 +++$+++ Yes I'm on a Mac (of course ;-) And it woorks swimingly for me, using Safari, FireFox, IE and OmniWeb.  +++$+++ :::Yes I'm on a Mac (of course ;-) And it woorks swimingly for me, using Safari, FireFox, IE and OmniWeb. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:38, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
279246 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ 2005-09-21 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.127357700E09 +++$+++ Some pages which use the templates display ok and some don't right? We need to figure out what is different between them. Here is a list of all the articles using the template [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Template%3ARf&limit=500&offset=0], are there any other pages that don't work, can you see a pattern? If you feel ambitious, we could work on a copy of the page that dosn't  work -  edit it by trial and error, figuring out the salient difference that way. Maybe someone else has an idea? (Oleg? Jitse? if you guys are reading this look at [[Template talk:Ent]] for more details.  +++$+++ :Some pages which use the templates display ok and some don't right? We need to figure out what is different between them. Here is a list of all the articles using the template [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Template%3ARf&limit=500&offset=0], are there any other pages that don't work, can you see a pattern? If you feel ambitious, we could work on a copy of the page that dosn't  work -  edit it by trial and error, figuring out the salient difference that way. Maybe someone else has an idea? (Oleg? Jitse? if you guys are reading this look at [[Template talk:Ent]] for more details. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:55, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
279247 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.127388360E09 +++$+++ and that's it. I clicked through all those bloody ancient Greeks and they were all fine. -- +++$+++ :and that's it. I clicked through all those bloody ancient Greeks and they were all fine. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 04:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
279248 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ 279247 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.127389080E09 +++$+++ So I guess the bug has to do with the fact the article is about mathematics, and not ancient Greece then. OK I will copy  [[Euler's Identity]] to a user page and start hacking it up.  +++$+++ ::So I guess the bug has to do with the fact the article is about mathematics, and not ancient Greece then. OK I will copy  [[Euler's Identity]] to a user page and start hacking it up. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:38, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
279249 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ 279248 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.127389980E09 +++$+++ One hack that works: If you separate the two end notes into separate h2 sections, the bug goes away. Not practical as a workaround, but possibly gives some insight? -- +++$+++ :::One hack that works: If you separate the two end notes into separate h2 sections, the bug goes away. Not practical as a workaround, but possibly gives some insight? --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 04:53, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
279250 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ 279248 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.127389920E09 +++$+++ OK I've created the following test page: [[User:Paul August\/Subpage 17]]. Tell me if you have a problem with it?  +++$+++ :::OK I've created the following test page: [[User:Paul August/Subpage 17]]. Tell me if you have a problem with it? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:52, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
279251 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ 279250 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.127389980E09 +++$+++ It looks fine. -- +++$+++ ::::It looks fine. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 04:53, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
279252 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ 279251 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.127390940E09 +++$+++ Hmm, It would have preferred it not to have worked. Ok I've restored it to the original. See if it has the problem now. I'm afraid I have to go to bed, but feel free to play around with the test file. Keep trying to remove extraneous things from the file, trying to reduce the problem to its essential features. We'll talk again tomorrow.  +++$+++ :::::Hmm, It would have preferred it not to have worked. Ok I've restored it to the original. See if it has the problem now. I'm afraid I have to go to bed, but feel free to play around with the test file. Keep trying to remove extraneous things from the file, trying to reduce the problem to its essential features. We'll talk again tomorrow. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:09, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
279253 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ 279252 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.127393280E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Paul_August\/Subpage_17&oldid=23731707 what's left] still has the bug. -- +++$+++ ::::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Paul_August/Subpage_17&oldid=23731707 what's left] still has the bug. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 05:48, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
279254 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279243 +++$+++ 279253 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.127393520E09 +++$+++ Though, ''not'' when I access it from that link.  The \"older revision\/newer revision\" seems to protect against the bug. -- +++$+++ :::::::Though, ''not'' when I access it from that link.  The "older revision/newer revision" seems to protect against the bug. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 05:52, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

264994 +++$+++ Mbeychok +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.181109600E09 +++$+++ [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]], you uploaded the subject OTEC diagram on November 11, 2006. I think it needs to be slightly revised by adding two arrows indicating the ammonia flow direction.  One arrow pointing to the left at the pump discharge and one arrow pointing down at the turbine outlet.  If you would like do so, please let me know. Otherwise, if you agree, I will make the revision. Please let me know which you prefer. Regards, -  +++$+++ [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]], you uploaded the subject OTEC diagram on November 11, 2006. I think it needs to be slightly revised by adding two arrows indicating the ammonia flow direction.  One arrow pointing to the left at the pump discharge and one arrow pointing down at the turbine outlet.  If you would like do so, please let me know. Otherwise, if you agree, I will make the revision. Please let me know which you prefer. Regards, - [[User:Mbeychok|mbeychok]] 23:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
264995 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264994 +++$+++ 264994 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.181143680E09 +++$+++ Please make the changes, This is a GDFL image so any image you make must remain GDFL. Its not my work . I found it under a free use license as stated on the image page. I think your changes are sensible one.  +++$+++ :Please make the changes, This is a GDFL image so any image you make must remain GDFL. Its not my work . I found it under a free use license as stated on the image page. I think your changes are sensible one. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 08:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
264996 +++$+++ Mbeychok +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 264994 +++$+++ 264995 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.181176680E09 +++$+++ Thanks, and I have revised the image. -  +++$+++ ::Thanks, and I have revised the image. - [[User:Mbeychok|mbeychok]] 17:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

17102 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-04 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.301976900E09 +++$+++ Replied to [[Template talk:Did you know#Soybean Car]] on your point.-- +++$+++ Replied to [[Template talk:Did you know#Soybean Car]] on your point.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 21:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
17103 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17102 +++$+++ 17102 +++$+++ 2011-04-04 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.301978640E09 +++$+++ I believe I have a solution that I submitted as '''Alt 1''' that I have a reference to and is close to your idea.-- +++$+++ :I believe I have a solution that I submitted as '''Alt 1''' that I have a reference to and is close to your idea.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 21:44, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
17104 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17102 +++$+++ 17103 +++$+++ 2011-04-05 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.302059040E09 +++$+++ Would my '''Alt 1''' that I have submitted be acceptable? I have a reference for that and have modified the article accordingly.-- +++$+++ ::Would my '''Alt 1''' that I have submitted be acceptable? I have a reference for that and have modified the article accordingly.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 20:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
17105 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17102 +++$+++ 17104 +++$+++ 2011-04-05 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.302061740E09 +++$+++ Replied to [[Template talk:Did you know#Soybean Car]] on your recent points.-- +++$+++ :::Replied to [[Template talk:Did you know#Soybean Car]] on your recent points.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 20:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
17106 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17102 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-05 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.302064380E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::::--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 21:33, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
17107 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17102 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-06 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.302116220E09 +++$+++ Would that then be acceptable?-- +++$+++ ::::::Would that then be acceptable?--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 11:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
17108 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17102 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-06 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.302124380E09 +++$+++ Suggestion offered at [[Template talk:Did you know#Soybean Car]].-- +++$+++ ::::::Suggestion offered at [[Template talk:Did you know#Soybean Car]].--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 14:13, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

541393 +++$+++ Optigan13 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-01 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.241182980E09 +++$+++ told me]] otherwise. - +++$+++ told me]] otherwise. -[[User:Optigan13|Optigan13]] ([[User talk:Optigan13|talk]]) 06:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
541394 +++$+++ Optigan13 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541393 +++$+++ 541393 +++$+++ 2009-05-01 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.241184600E09 +++$+++ re [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Optigan13&diff=287197978&oldid=284434114]: Thanks, I think even in the best wikiprojects most people do just work on whatever they're interested in and check in when they see something that matters to them. There's a lot of geographic articles to deal with in California so as long as you're contributing to articles anything else is just to help with that. With the talkheader, yeah I that they would have come out with some reduced template or a tweak to the mediawiki software to post some of that same info, but so far nothing. Thanks, - +++$+++ :re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Optigan13&diff=287197978&oldid=284434114]: Thanks, I think even in the best wikiprojects most people do just work on whatever they're interested in and check in when they see something that matters to them. There's a lot of geographic articles to deal with in California so as long as you're contributing to articles anything else is just to help with that. With the talkheader, yeah I that they would have come out with some reduced template or a tweak to the mediawiki software to post some of that same info, but so far nothing. Thanks, -[[User:Optigan13|Optigan13]] ([[User talk:Optigan13|talk]]) 06:30, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

279255 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279255 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-22 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.127393760E09 +++$+++ When I turned off \"use MathML if possible\" in my preferences, the bug went away. I'd be curious whether you can see it in Firefox, if you turn on MathML -- +++$+++ When I turned off "use MathML if possible" in my preferences, the bug went away. I'd be curious whether you can see it in Firefox, if you turn on MathML --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 05:56, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
279256 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279255 +++$+++ 279255 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.127423940E09 +++$+++ Good work! Yes turning on MathML in my prefs produces the problem - in all my browsers. This will make it much easier for me to work on. Thanks!  +++$+++ :Good work! Yes turning on MathML in my prefs produces the problem - in all my browsers. This will make it much easier for me to work on. Thanks! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:19, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

17112 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-14 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.302827580E09 +++$+++ If any of your work on handcrafts includes [[weaving]] or [[natural dye]]s, can you you give me a heads-up?  Thanks! -  +++$+++ If any of your work on handcrafts includes [[weaving]] or [[natural dye]]s, can you you give me a heads-up?  Thanks! - [[User:PKM|PKM]] ([[User talk:PKM|talk]]) 17:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
17113 +++$+++ PKM +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17112 +++$+++ 17112 +++$+++ 2011-04-14 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.302840720E09 +++$+++ Oh, doh, [[Textiles of Mexico]] is yours!  I actually added some links to that back in January when I was working on [[natural dye]].  Great article.  Small world. ;-) -  +++$+++ :Oh, doh, [[Textiles of Mexico]] is yours!  I actually added some links to that back in January when I was working on [[natural dye]].  Great article.  Small world. ;-) - [[User:PKM|PKM]] ([[User talk:PKM|talk]]) 21:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

279257 +++$+++ Encephalon +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279257 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-26 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.127728980E09 +++$+++ Wadya say?\u2014 +++$+++ Wadya say?—[[User:Encephalon|<font color=000077>encephalon</font>]][[User talk:Encephalon|<font color=B0B0B0>εγκέφαλον</font>]] 03:03, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
279258 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279257 +++$+++ 279257 +++$+++ 2005-09-26 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.127730960E09 +++$+++ Hi Encephalon. I haven't been following the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Footnote3]] and It is too long for me to read through it all right now. Maybe I will read through it later. The only auto-numbering system that I know of uses the mediawiki's auto-numbered external links feature. That has two problems. It means that you can't use external links in the article, since it will screw up the auto-numbering. And it means that noted text is indicated by superscripted bracketed numbers, which I don't like as well as superscripted numerals. Manual numbering is not that hard. And besides the numbers in the text don't really have to be in order. Only the numbers in the \"Notes\" section do.  +++$+++ :Hi Encephalon. I haven't been following the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Footnote3]] and It is too long for me to read through it all right now. Maybe I will read through it later. The only auto-numbering system that I know of uses the mediawiki's auto-numbered external links feature. That has two problems. It means that you can't use external links in the article, since it will screw up the auto-numbering. And it means that noted text is indicated by superscripted bracketed numbers, which I don't like as well as superscripted numerals. Manual numbering is not that hard. And besides the numbers in the text don't really have to be in order. Only the numbers in the "Notes" section do. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:36, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
279259 +++$+++ Encephalon +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279257 +++$+++ 279258 +++$+++ 2005-09-26 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.127738760E09 +++$+++ Hm. Thanks for explaining that. I hadn't realized that that was the reason for the brackets in {{tl|ref}} (though in hindsight it of course makes sense: external links placed in the text without a word or phrase will get autonumbered along with the {{tl|ref}} numerals). I was only hoping that, if you managed a version of rf-ent that met the objections to it, it might formally be put forward as an improvement over ref-note, and thereby be spared a TfD. Do watch that page, though, Paul, if you don't currently. Discussions over footnotes take place there quite often, and I imagine you'd like to know of discussions over the fate of your excellent creations. I expect Francis will move to TfD them soon.\u2014[[User:Encephalon|<font color=000077>encephalon<\/font>]][[User talk:Encephalon|<font color=B0B0B0>\u03b5\u03b3\u03ba\u03ad\u03c6\u03b1\u03bb\u03bf\u03bd<\/font>]] 05:29, 26 September 2005 (UTC) <s>''NB''. I'm not sure I understand what you meant by \"''the numbers in the text don't really have to be in order. Only the numbers in the \"Notes\" section do''.\" If I have a reference to \"John\", but write <nowiki>{{rf|1|John}}<\/nowiki> and <nowiki>{{ent|2|John}}<\/nowiki>, I believe clicking on <sup>1<\/sup> in the text will still take me to the correct reference at the bottom (ie. <sup>2<\/sup>John). But the numbers would still remain out of sync, wouldn't they?\u2014[[User:Encephalon|<font color=000077>encephalon<\/font>]][[User talk:Encephalon|<font color=B0B0B0>\u03b5\u03b3\u03ba\u03ad\u03c6\u03b1\u03bb\u03bf\u03bd<\/font>]] 05:29, 26 September 2005 (UTC)<\/s> Sorry, I see what you mean.\u2014 +++$+++ ::Hm. Thanks for explaining that. I hadn't realized that that was the reason for the brackets in {{tl|ref}} (though in hindsight it of course makes sense: external links placed in the text without a word or phrase will get autonumbered along with the {{tl|ref}} numerals). I was only hoping that, if you managed a version of rf-ent that met the objections to it, it might formally be put forward as an improvement over ref-note, and thereby be spared a TfD. Do watch that page, though, Paul, if you don't currently. Discussions over footnotes take place there quite often, and I imagine you'd like to know of discussions over the fate of your excellent creations. I expect Francis will move to TfD them soon.—[[User:Encephalon|<font color=000077>encephalon</font>]][[User talk:Encephalon|<font color=B0B0B0>εγκέφαλον</font>]] 05:29, 26 September 2005 (UTC) <s>''NB''. I'm not sure I understand what you meant by "''the numbers in the text don't really have to be in order. Only the numbers in the "Notes" section do''." If I have a reference to "John", but write <nowiki>{{rf|1|John}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{ent|2|John}}</nowiki>, I believe clicking on <sup>1</sup> in the text will still take me to the correct reference at the bottom (ie. <sup>2</sup>John). But the numbers would still remain out of sync, wouldn't they?—[[User:Encephalon|<font color=000077>encephalon</font>]][[User talk:Encephalon|<font color=B0B0B0>εγκέφαλον</font>]] 05:29, 26 September 2005 (UTC)</s> Sorry, I see what you mean.—[[User:Encephalon|<font color=000077>encephalon</font>]][[User talk:Encephalon|<font color=B0B0B0>εγκέφαλον</font>]] 05:46, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

279260 +++$+++ TheoClarke +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-21 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.127362260E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your concern.  I was sucked away by the demands of paid work and [[The Ashes]], successively.  I then realised that I felt brighter without the daily dip into wikiconflict so I stayed away again.  I am impressed with your contributions to the Ed Poor debate but I am not surprised that you felt them to be wasted. The realisation that such processes are time-consuming and ineffective is part of my disaffection with the project. I am now determined to focus on the rewarding aspects. &mdash; +++$+++ Thank you for your concern.  I was sucked away by the demands of paid work and [[The Ashes]], successively.  I then realised that I felt brighter without the daily dip into wikiconflict so I stayed away again.  I am impressed with your contributions to the Ed Poor debate but I am not surprised that you felt them to be wasted. The realisation that such processes are time-consuming and ineffective is part of my disaffection with the project. I am now determined to focus on the rewarding aspects. &mdash;[[User:TheoClarke|Theo ]] [[User_talk:TheoClarke|(Talk)]] 21:11, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
279261 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279260 +++$+++ 279260 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.127377140E09 +++$+++ Glad to find that you are still among the living. And Fil is back too! I am still optimistic about our little wikicommunity. But when I retreat to just editing articles It is always a breath of fresh air. I've been enjoying thinking about Dante again. I recommend it. Oh and Fil is offering to make a nice cup of hot tea for anyone who drops by. Keep in touch.  +++$+++ :Glad to find that you are still among the living. And Fil is back too! I am still optimistic about our little wikicommunity. But when I retreat to just editing articles It is always a breath of fresh air. I've been enjoying thinking about Dante again. I recommend it. Oh and Fil is offering to make a nice cup of hot tea for anyone who drops by. Keep in touch. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 01:19, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
279262 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279260 +++$+++ 279261 +++$+++ 2005-09-22 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.127426460E09 +++$+++ Oh and how do I know you aren't Theo's shade, communicating from beyond the grave?  +++$+++ ::Oh and how do I know you aren't Theo's shade, communicating from beyond the grave? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:01, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

541405 +++$+++ Rosiestep +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541405 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-12 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.242121320E09 +++$+++ | width=\"90%\" | My RFA [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Rosiestep|passed today at 75\/2\/1]] so I wanted to thank you for your participation in it. Special thanks go to [[User:GlassCobra|GlassCobra]] and [[User:FlyingToaster|FlyingToaster]] for their nomination and support. ''Cheers!'' -- +++$+++ | width="90%" | My RFA [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rosiestep|passed today at 75/2/1]] so I wanted to thank you for your participation in it. Special thanks go to [[User:GlassCobra|GlassCobra]] and [[User:FlyingToaster|FlyingToaster]] for their nomination and support. ''Cheers!'' --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 02:42, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
541406 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541405 +++$+++ 541405 +++$+++ 2009-05-13 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.242220020E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] ([[User talk:William Allen Simpson|talk]]) 06:07, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
541407 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541405 +++$+++ 541405 +++$+++ 2009-05-13 06:17:00 +++$+++ 1.242220620E09 +++$+++ I wish. I may still be naive enough to think that more editors would come around if a core group chimes in at every CFD with the radically normal idea that racial, ethnic, and religious categories make no sense. It was a \"strategy\" I learned about while reading on the US Supreme Court - a couple of justices refused to uphold any death penalty judgments coming to the conclusion that capital punishment is wrong. Eventually they swayed a third member. For a while executions were stopped, basically until the various justices who had been opposed to it died and were replaced by other justices who were more malleable to the political will. We don't have a political will driving people's behavior. What's best for the 'pedia is what drives me and an abiding sense that these categories do nothing to enlighten because there is no objective criteria for inclusion and only divide both wikipedians and people in general. And what makes them definitional? Being of some small % of Fooian descent makes one do what differently, that a small % less doesn't make one do? Laughable. Even Goebels would have a hard time explaining that logic. So, as for a plan - I keep chiming in to delete these at every opportunity, nominating the most egregious ones I come across so as not to be disruptive. If you do as well, and a few other decent people do so, consensus can and will change.  +++$+++ :I wish. I may still be naive enough to think that more editors would come around if a core group chimes in at every CFD with the radically normal idea that racial, ethnic, and religious categories make no sense. It was a "strategy" I learned about while reading on the US Supreme Court - a couple of justices refused to uphold any death penalty judgments coming to the conclusion that capital punishment is wrong. Eventually they swayed a third member. For a while executions were stopped, basically until the various justices who had been opposed to it died and were replaced by other justices who were more malleable to the political will. We don't have a political will driving people's behavior. What's best for the 'pedia is what drives me and an abiding sense that these categories do nothing to enlighten because there is no objective criteria for inclusion and only divide both wikipedians and people in general. And what makes them definitional? Being of some small % of Fooian descent makes one do what differently, that a small % less doesn't make one do? Laughable. Even Goebels would have a hard time explaining that logic. So, as for a plan - I keep chiming in to delete these at every opportunity, nominating the most egregious ones I come across so as not to be disruptive. If you do as well, and a few other decent people do so, consensus can and will change. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] ([[User talk:Carlossuarez46|talk]]) 06:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
541408 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541405 +++$+++ 541405 +++$+++ 2009-05-28 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.243548720E09 +++$+++ -- ''watching this thread here'' -- +++$+++ :-- ''watching this thread here'' --[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] ([[User talk:William Allen Simpson|talk]]) 15:12, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
541409 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541405 +++$+++ 541405 +++$+++ 2009-06-18 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.245368820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for coming back again, and having a sense of humor, some of your comments at CfD have me laughing out loud! My expression of humor has a tendency to be sarcasm, not always well received....<br \/>-- +++$+++ :Thanks for coming back again, and having a sense of humor, some of your comments at CfD have me laughing out loud! My expression of humor has a tendency to be sarcasm, not always well received....<br />--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] ([[User talk:William Allen Simpson|talk]]) 16:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

279264 +++$+++ Clawson +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-23 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.127465340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for catching the Malcolm X vandal's work on my user page. It's much appreciated.&mdash;'''[[{{ns:2}}:Clawson|chris.lawson]]'''&nbsp;( +++$+++ Thanks for catching the Malcolm X vandal's work on my user page. It's much appreciated.&mdash;'''[[{{ns:2}}:Clawson|chris.lawson]]'''&nbsp;([[User_talk:Clawson|talk]]) 01:49, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
279265 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279264 +++$+++ 279264 +++$+++ 2005-09-23 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.127465400E09 +++$+++ You're welcome  +++$+++ :You're welcome [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 01:50, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
279266 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279264 +++$+++ 279264 +++$+++ 2005-09-23 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.127507760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:36, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

279267 +++$+++ HappyCamper +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-25 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.127694300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the nice reminder about protected pages. -- +++$+++ Thanks for the nice reminder about protected pages. --[[User:HappyCamper|HappyCamper]] 17:25, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
279268 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279267 +++$+++ 279267 +++$+++ 2005-09-25 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.127699100E09 +++$+++ Your very welcome ;-)  +++$+++ :Your very welcome ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:45, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
279269 +++$+++ HappyCamper +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279267 +++$+++ 279268 +++$+++ 2005-09-25 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.127700360E09 +++$+++ By the way, would you happen to know where I can read up on how to create a 'bot? I'd like to make something that would automatically archive the reference desk. Right now, there are over 700+ questions there, and it is quickly becoming a bit too impractical to archive manually. -- +++$+++ ::By the way, would you happen to know where I can read up on how to create a 'bot? I'd like to make something that would automatically archive the reference desk. Right now, there are over 700+ questions there, and it is quickly becoming a bit too impractical to archive manually. --[[User:HappyCamper|HappyCamper]] 19:06, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
279270 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279267 +++$+++ 279269 +++$+++ 2005-09-25 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.127701140E09 +++$+++ No I don't know anything abot bot writing, although I would like to. Try asking botmesiters {{User|AllyUnion}} or {{user|Oleg Alexandrov}}.  +++$+++ :::No I don't know anything abot bot writing, although I would like to. Try asking botmesiters {{User|AllyUnion}} or {{user|Oleg Alexandrov}}. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:19, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

541414 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541414 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-20 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.242868800E09 +++$+++ Please restore [[Don't bother me]], as it was actually a user talk page before it was moved to the mainspace, so please restore it, and move it back to the user talk page that it was move from, which is the talk page of the user who moved it in the first place.\u2014 ''' +++$+++ Please restore [[Don't bother me]], as it was actually a user talk page before it was moved to the mainspace, so please restore it, and move it back to the user talk page that it was move from, which is the talk page of the user who moved it in the first place.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 18:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
541415 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541414 +++$+++ 541414 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.242869160E09 +++$+++ User talk pages are still rarely deleted, and even further, if this user requests an unblock, that evidence of past behavior needs to be accessible.  The user essentially got away with getting his talk deleted without even requesting it.\u2014 ''' +++$+++ :User talk pages are still rarely deleted, and even further, if this user requests an unblock, that evidence of past behavior needs to be accessible.  The user essentially got away with getting his talk deleted without even requesting it.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 18:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
541416 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541414 +++$+++ 541415 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.242870360E09 +++$+++ Just that, that the user cannot edit their own talk page.  Thank you for the restore, and thank you for your time.\u2014 ''' +++$+++ ::Just that, that the user cannot edit their own talk page.  Thank you for the restore, and thank you for your time.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 18:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
541417 +++$+++ Daedalus969 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541414 +++$+++ 541416 +++$+++ 2009-05-20 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.242870480E09 +++$+++ Well, you didn't restore it, my bad.  What I mean is, thank you for leaving the note.\u2014 ''' +++$+++ :::Well, you didn't restore it, my bad.  What I mean is, thank you for leaving the note.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 18:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

279271 +++$+++ Daveb +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-26 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.127725800E09 +++$+++ Cheers, -- +++$+++ Cheers, --[[User:Daveb|Daveb]] 02:10, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
279272 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279271 +++$+++ 279271 +++$+++ 2005-09-26 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.127729040E09 +++$+++ Hi Daveb. The purpose of an AfD discussion is to determine whether there is a consensus for deletion or not. In this case there were two editors who were in favor of deleting the article and five who were not (any other recommendation than delete is a recommendation to keep, for example a redirect is a particular kind of keep) Thus there was clearly no consensus for deletion. And, although there was a majority to keep, it was not large enough (in my view - there is no set amount) to call it a consensus. Nevertheless, a lack of consensus to delete means the article will be kept by default. However the article can still be redirected. It could well be that all the editors who expressed an opinion on the AfD would support that. Such a decision is a normal editorial decision which can be addressed on the articles talk page, and doesn't involve AFD. Does that make sense? If anything I wrote wasn't clear, or you have aother questions, I'd be happy to try and answer them.  +++$+++ :Hi Daveb. The purpose of an AfD discussion is to determine whether there is a consensus for deletion or not. In this case there were two editors who were in favor of deleting the article and five who were not (any other recommendation than delete is a recommendation to keep, for example a redirect is a particular kind of keep) Thus there was clearly no consensus for deletion. And, although there was a majority to keep, it was not large enough (in my view - there is no set amount) to call it a consensus. Nevertheless, a lack of consensus to delete means the article will be kept by default. However the article can still be redirected. It could well be that all the editors who expressed an opinion on the AfD would support that. Such a decision is a normal editorial decision which can be addressed on the articles talk page, and doesn't involve AFD. Does that make sense? If anything I wrote wasn't clear, or you have aother questions, I'd be happy to try and answer them. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:04, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
279273 +++$+++ Daveb +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279271 +++$+++ 279272 +++$+++ 2005-09-26 09:44:00 +++$+++ 1.127753040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that Paul - much clearer now. Cheers, -- +++$+++ :: Thanks for that Paul - much clearer now. Cheers, --[[User:Daveb|Daveb]] 09:44, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
279274 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279271 +++$+++ 279271 +++$+++ 2005-09-26 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.127720040E09 +++$+++ Hi Ally. Your AFD bot is removing the purge cache template when it closes the current AFD day. Is there any reason why it can't leave it there?  +++$+++ :Hi Ally. Your AFD bot is removing the purge cache template when it closes the current AFD day. Is there any reason why it can't leave it there? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:34, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

90236 +++$+++ OlEnglish +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-17 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.271544960E09 +++$+++ How can you say \"per Afd\" when that was clearly not the result? --  +++$+++ How can you say "per Afd" when that was clearly not the result? -- [[User:OlEnglish|<font size="5">&oelig;</font>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>&trade;</sup>]] 15:56, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
90237 +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90236 +++$+++ 90236 +++$+++ 2010-04-17 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.271545140E09 +++$+++ It wasn't? [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Avisodomy]] clearly says \"The result was redirect to Zoophilia\". Either way, ther was nothing to merge in the first place, the quote and the definition itself don't seem to be noteworthy. -- +++$+++ :It wasn't? [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avisodomy]] clearly says "The result was redirect to Zoophilia". Either way, ther was nothing to merge in the first place, the quote and the definition itself don't seem to be noteworthy. --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 15:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
90238 +++$+++ OlEnglish +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90236 +++$+++ 90237 +++$+++ 2010-04-17 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.271545680E09 +++$+++ No it wasn't. Nowhere does anyone suggest a redirect. It was either merge or delete. Seems the closing admin decided to effect his own judgment onto the article and lazily close it as a redirect without taking into consideration that there were calls for a merge from several commentators. As for the subject matter, it's noteworthy enough for at least a simple mention of the term in [[Zoophilia]] which I would've been fine with. But that doesn't matter anyways, the point is that process was not followed and I'm irked about it. --  +++$+++ ::No it wasn't. Nowhere does anyone suggest a redirect. It was either merge or delete. Seems the closing admin decided to effect his own judgment onto the article and lazily close it as a redirect without taking into consideration that there were calls for a merge from several commentators. As for the subject matter, it's noteworthy enough for at least a simple mention of the term in [[Zoophilia]] which I would've been fine with. But that doesn't matter anyways, the point is that process was not followed and I'm irked about it. -- [[User:OlEnglish|<font size="5">&oelig;</font>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>&trade;</sup>]] 16:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
90239 +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90236 +++$+++ 90238 +++$+++ 2010-04-17 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.271547420E09 +++$+++ Well, if you feel strongly about this, you can just add the definition of the term into the article. I don't think it's noteworthy, but I don't care too much either way. And if you want to follow process, you could either talk to the closing admin or start a [[WP:DRV]]. Personally, I'd just let it go, since the end result won't be different either way. -- +++$+++ :::Well, if you feel strongly about this, you can just add the definition of the term into the article. I don't think it's noteworthy, but I don't care too much either way. And if you want to follow process, you could either talk to the closing admin or start a [[WP:DRV]]. Personally, I'd just let it go, since the end result won't be different either way. --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 16:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
90240 +++$+++ OlEnglish +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90236 +++$+++ 90239 +++$+++ 2010-04-17 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.271548560E09 +++$+++ If the end result will be that admins follow proper process in the future when closing AFDs then a DRV would be worth it. But.. meh. --  +++$+++ ::::If the end result will be that admins follow proper process in the future when closing AFDs then a DRV would be worth it. But.. meh. -- [[User:OlEnglish|<font size="5">&oelig;</font>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>&trade;</sup>]] 16:56, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

279275 +++$+++ AllyUnion +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-26 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.127729820E09 +++$+++ On the request of [[User:Radiant!|Radiant!]], it was requested for it to be removed.  But frankly, I do not see any reason to leave it on either.  Is there any specific reason you think it should be left on? -- +++$+++ On the request of [[User:Radiant!|Radiant!]], it was requested for it to be removed.  But frankly, I do not see any reason to leave it on either.  Is there any specific reason you think it should be left on? --[[User:AllyUnion|AllyUnion]] [[User talk:AllyUnion|(talk)]] 03:17, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
279276 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279275 +++$+++ 279275 +++$+++ 2005-09-26 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.127769000E09 +++$+++ Well if you don't purge the cache you don't see the previous updates that have been made to the transcluded pages. So, for example this can cause \"double\" closures, where an editor will \"close\" the AfD even though it has been already closed. I've had to correct several of these recently. Is there some reason it should ''not'' be left on?   +++$+++ :Well if you don't purge the cache you don't see the previous updates that have been made to the transcluded pages. So, for example this can cause "double" closures, where an editor will "close" the AfD even though it has been already closed. I've had to correct several of these recently. Is there some reason it should ''not'' be left on?  [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:10, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
279277 +++$+++ AllyUnion +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279275 +++$+++ 279276 +++$+++ 2005-09-26 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.127773620E09 +++$+++ No, not really... just that when everything is closed, it is no longer necessary...  The request has been changed in AFD Bot. -- +++$+++ :: No, not really... just that when everything is closed, it is no longer necessary...  The request has been changed in AFD Bot. --[[User:AllyUnion|AllyUnion]] [[User talk:AllyUnion|(talk)]] 15:27, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
279278 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279275 +++$+++ 279275 +++$+++ 2005-09-26 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.127774100E09 +++$+++ Well I've been adding the links maunally, for a couple of days now, it would be easier if your bot did it, but I can just keep on doing what I've been doing.  +++$+++ :Well I've been adding the links maunally, for a couple of days now, it would be easier if your bot did it, but I can just keep on doing what I've been doing. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:35, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
279279 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279275 +++$+++ 279278 +++$+++ 2005-09-26 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.127774460E09 +++$+++ Thanks Ally. (When I responded to the above I didn't see the newly added part about the the bot being changed ;-)  +++$+++ ::Thanks Ally. (When I responded to the above I didn't see the newly added part about the the bot being changed ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:41, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

17133 +++$+++ Nsaum75 +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17133 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-01 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.306983060E09 +++$+++ How have you been?  Its horribly hot down here...Its gotten up into the 90s during the day -- a rarity for Oaxaca city. I cannot wait for the rainy season to come!-- +++$+++ How have you been?  Its horribly hot down here...Its gotten up into the 90s during the day -- a rarity for Oaxaca city. I cannot wait for the rainy season to come!--[[User:nsaum75|<span style="background:#acf;padding:2px;color:white;text-shadow:black 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em">&nbsp;'''nsaum75'''&nbsp;</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:nsaum75|<span lang="he" xml:lang="he" dir="rtl">!Dígame¡</span>&lrm;]]</sup> 19:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
17134 +++$+++ Tbhotch +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17133 +++$+++ 17133 +++$+++ 2011-06-01 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.306984200E09 +++$+++ At least for now it should be merged, it's about the same topic. Probably if the Canyon article were big enough it would be keep as now. <small>[[User talk: Tbhotch\/Signature|<font color=\"#DAA520\">\u06de<\/font>]]<\/small> [[User:Tbhotch|<font color=\"#4B0082\">Tb<\/font><font color=\"#6082B6\">hotch<\/font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tbhotch|<font color=\"#555555\"><big>\u2122<\/big><\/font>]]<\/sup> & [[Special:Contributions\/Tbhotch|<font color=\"#006600\">(\u2184)]],  +++$+++ :At least for now it should be merged, it's about the same topic. Probably if the Canyon article were big enough it would be keep as now. <small>[[User talk: Tbhotch/Signature|<font color="#DAA520">۞</font>]]</small> [[User:Tbhotch|<font color="#4B0082">Tb</font><font color="#6082B6">hotch</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tbhotch|<font color="#555555"><big>™</big></font>]]</sup> & [[Special:Contributions/Tbhotch|<font color="#006600">(ↄ)]], [[User:Tbhotch/EN|<font color="#2C1608">Problems with my English?</font>]] 20:10, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

17135 +++$+++ 76.95.196.87 +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17135 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-06 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.307428080E09 +++$+++ Have a nice day.--[[Special:Contributions\/76.95.196.87|76.95.196.87]] ( +++$+++ Have a nice day.--[[Special:Contributions/76.95.196.87|76.95.196.87]] ([[User talk:76.95.196.87|talk]]) 23:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
17136 +++$+++ 76.95.196.87 +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17135 +++$+++ 17135 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.307433240E09 +++$+++ Can you at least (for the sake that I put out of my own time and effort) put the 1921 stats for each state in the \"History\" section? (And mention that since then, the population ethnic demographics may have changed dramatically). --[[Special:Contributions\/76.95.196.87|76.95.196.87]] ( +++$+++ :Can you at least (for the sake that I put out of my own time and effort) put the 1921 stats for each state in the "History" section? (And mention that since then, the population ethnic demographics may have changed dramatically). --[[Special:Contributions/76.95.196.87|76.95.196.87]] ([[User talk:76.95.196.87|talk]]) 00:54, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
17137 +++$+++ Maunus +++$+++ Thelmadatter +++$+++ 17135 +++$+++ 17136 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.307433840E09 +++$+++ No, it would require that a good secondary source discusses the sentence and suggests that it is of particular relevance for understanding the demographic development of the states. As it is the information is poorly source and it is not at all obvious why it would be relevant for readers to know how many people described themselves as \"indigena pura\" or \"blanco\" or \"indigena mezclado\" in 1921. +++$+++ ::No, it would require that a good secondary source discusses the sentence and suggests that it is of particular relevance for understanding the demographic development of the states. As it is the information is poorly source and it is not at all obvious why it would be relevant for readers to know how many people described themselves as "indigena pura" or "blanco" or "indigena mezclado" in 1921.[[User:Maunus|·ʍaunus]]·[[User talk:Maunus|snunɐw·]] 01:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

279280 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-26 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.127753340E09 +++$+++ What the hell is going on over there? I'm half minded to remove myself from the members list if it's just going to turn into a battlefield of egos.  +++$+++ What the hell is going on over there? I'm half minded to remove myself from the members list if it's just going to turn into a battlefield of egos. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|The kettle's on]] 09:49, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
279281 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279280 +++$+++ 279280 +++$+++ 2005-09-26 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.127770680E09 +++$+++ I wish I knew. Wikipedia is a [[chaos theory|chaotic place]]. I am just going to try to be a patient [[butterfly effect|butterfly flapping my wings]] encouragingly here and there, and wait and see if Esperanza will [[emergent property|somehow emerge]] from its cocoon.  +++$+++ :I wish I knew. Wikipedia is a [[chaos theory|chaotic place]]. I am just going to try to be a patient [[butterfly effect|butterfly flapping my wings]] encouragingly here and there, and wait and see if Esperanza will [[emergent property|somehow emerge]] from its cocoon. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:38, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

279282 +++$+++ Chalst +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279282 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-26 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.127788560E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid the poor demarcation between [[Aristotelian logic]] and [[term logic]] has bitten a contributor, who has laboriously provided a lengthy explanation of syllogistic inference in the former that largely duplicates the explanation in the latter.  I'm proposing a merge again, on [[Talk:Aristotelian logic]] ---  +++$+++ I'm afraid the poor demarcation between [[Aristotelian logic]] and [[term logic]] has bitten a contributor, who has laboriously provided a lengthy explanation of syllogistic inference in the former that largely duplicates the explanation in the latter.  I'm proposing a merge again, on [[Talk:Aristotelian logic]] --- [[User:Chalst|Charles Stewart]] 19:36, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
279283 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279282 +++$+++ 279282 +++$+++ 2005-09-26 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.127791560E09 +++$+++ Hi Charles. The merge is fine by me, I've said so [[Talk:Aristotelian logic|there]].  By the way, I know you expressed an opinion about the name [[Boole's syllogistic]] for that article, but did you have any thoughts on the best names for the [[Boolean algebra]] and [[Boolean logic]] articles? Are you happy with those names? There has been some discussion that they should each be renamed \"Boolean algebra\" followed by some parenthetical disabiguation. But we can't seem to agree on what the best disambiguation would be, if you haven't already, see: [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Boolean algebra, redux]], [[talk:Boolean algebra]] and [[talk:Boolean logic]].  +++$+++ :Hi Charles. The merge is fine by me, I've said so [[Talk:Aristotelian logic|there]].  By the way, I know you expressed an opinion about the name [[Boole's syllogistic]] for that article, but did you have any thoughts on the best names for the [[Boolean algebra]] and [[Boolean logic]] articles? Are you happy with those names? There has been some discussion that they should each be renamed "Boolean algebra" followed by some parenthetical disabiguation. But we can't seem to agree on what the best disambiguation would be, if you haven't already, see: [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Boolean algebra, redux]], [[talk:Boolean algebra]] and [[talk:Boolean logic]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:26, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
279284 +++$+++ Chalst +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279282 +++$+++ 279283 +++$+++ 2005-09-27 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.127855100E09 +++$+++ I saw the discussion, and I had thought the article had reached the consensus of leaving things as they were, which I am happy with.  I'll put a note there saying so, and why.  I'll make a start on the merge today, and probably finish it on Thursday.  Thanks for the welcome! ---  +++$+++ ::I saw the discussion, and I had thought the article had reached the consensus of leaving things as they were, which I am happy with.  I'll put a note there saying so, and why.  I'll make a start on the merge today, and probably finish it on Thursday.  Thanks for the welcome! --- [[User:Chalst|Charles Stewart]] 14:05, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
279285 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279282 +++$+++ 279282 +++$+++ 2005-09-28 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.127917740E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's what Filiocht means. You'd say it something like fill-e-oct (as in octet, more or less, three syllables, short 'e' as second one). Why, pray tell, would my name arise in a Boston meetup? Nothing bad, I hope.  +++$+++ :Yes, that's what Filiocht means. You'd say it something like fill-e-oct (as in octet, more or less, three syllables, short 'e' as second one). Why, pray tell, would my name arise in a Boston meetup? Nothing bad, I hope. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|The kettle's on]] 07:29, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
279286 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279282 +++$+++ 279285 +++$+++ 2005-09-28 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.127934960E09 +++$+++ Oh we were all talking about what a scoundrel and a rogue you are ;-)  No &mdash; It only \"came up\" in my mind. Some imagined conversation about my recent experiences within WP I think. It was my first time at the meeting and I suppose I was self-consciously wondering what I would talk about.  Sorry to have piqued your imagination unnecessarily ;-)  +++$+++ ::Oh we were all talking about what a scoundrel and a rogue you are ;-)  No &mdash; It only "came up" in my mind. Some imagined conversation about my recent experiences within WP I think. It was my first time at the meeting and I suppose I was self-consciously wondering what I would talk about.  Sorry to have piqued your imagination unnecessarily ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 12:16, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
279287 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279282 +++$+++ 279286 +++$+++ 2005-09-28 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.127936880E09 +++$+++ Fair enough; hope you enjoyed the meetup. Are we going to reformat the Dante list as per your preference? I'll help out as and when I can.  +++$+++ :::Fair enough; hope you enjoyed the meetup. Are we going to reformat the Dante list as per your preference? I'll help out as and when I can. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|The kettle's on]] 12:48, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
279288 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279282 +++$+++ 279287 +++$+++ 2005-09-28 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.127939940E09 +++$+++ Yes, thanks for being\" agreeable\" ;-) I appreciate the offer of help, but I would ''really'' prefer if you spent time adding content and let me do the drudge work. You being the man of letters, and me the man of numbers, it seems like a more reasonable division of labour.  Also I would feel a bit guilty, since I couldn't help feeling I was making you cater to my perfectionistic whims ;-) As for the meetup, it was nice to see some of these people face-to-face. It left me feeling more optimistic about WP. There is some talk about holding the next [[wikimania]] in Boston. That might be interesting.  +++$+++ ::::Yes, thanks for being" agreeable" ;-) I appreciate the offer of help, but I would ''really'' prefer if you spent time adding content and let me do the drudge work. You being the man of letters, and me the man of numbers, it seems like a more reasonable division of labour.  Also I would feel a bit guilty, since I couldn't help feeling I was making you cater to my perfectionistic whims ;-) As for the meetup, it was nice to see some of these people face-to-face. It left me feeling more optimistic about WP. There is some talk about holding the next [[wikimania]] in Boston. That might be interesting. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:39, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

541429 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541429 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-31 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.243759800E09 +++$+++ In my RfA, you stated \"''The more you are willing to work close to the line, the more you need to be able to receive the criticism (rightly or wrongly your due) that comes with that. Since you are unwilling, I think we should not enable you.''\" Accordingly, during the RfA, I established a page for IP addresses to communicate with me (linked at the top of my regular talk page too). Does that address your concerns? <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ In my RfA, you stated "''The more you are willing to work close to the line, the more you need to be able to receive the criticism (rightly or wrongly your due) that comes with that. Since you are unwilling, I think we should not enable you.''" Accordingly, during the RfA, I established a page for IP addresses to communicate with me (linked at the top of my regular talk page too). Does that address your concerns? <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 01:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
541430 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541429 +++$+++ 541429 +++$+++ 2009-06-02 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.243934220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your response. To answer your question, no, I have not tested the waters on these pages, ''but'' a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/TomPhan\/Archive|checkuser\/sockpuppet investigation immediately after the RfA]] confirmed [[User:TomPhan|the indef blocked user]] was indeed the one who was making those comments, so the problem user is still out there. Accordingly, I've left my talk page and user page in the state they are in. I'll admit I was hesitant to make such a page as it might attract more vandalism\/accusations of felonies\/death threats, but I've also noticed that no one is using it and I think I know why: a lack of an audience. The ''only'' person that will see it is me or an admin\/oversighter whom I ask to look at it. Ergo, no audience=no problems. In short, thanks for the feedback and I hope I can count on your support next time. <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for your response. To answer your question, no, I have not tested the waters on these pages, ''but'' a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/TomPhan/Archive|checkuser/sockpuppet investigation immediately after the RfA]] confirmed [[User:TomPhan|the indef blocked user]] was indeed the one who was making those comments, so the problem user is still out there. Accordingly, I've left my talk page and user page in the state they are in. I'll admit I was hesitant to make such a page as it might attract more vandalism/accusations of felonies/death threats, but I've also noticed that no one is using it and I think I know why: a lack of an audience. The ''only'' person that will see it is me or an admin/oversighter whom I ask to look at it. Ergo, no audience=no problems. In short, thanks for the feedback and I hope I can count on your support next time. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 02:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
541431 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541429 +++$+++ 541430 +++$+++ 2009-06-02 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.243938600E09 +++$+++ It doesn't alert me that messages are there, but it ''is'' in my watchlist (which I check regularly). As for \"I wouldn't assume that you have no audience at that page - as you are going to be a candidate at RFA all the regulars at RFA will scrutinize it.\" It would only be an audience after the fact (i.e. at my next RfA) and anything truly problematic can be oversighted in a hurry. I would expect [[User:TomPhan]] to use his usual route of block evasion and not even use the page. Accordingly, it will probably only be used by legit users wishing to contact me. As far as I can see, it is win-win. <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ ::It doesn't alert me that messages are there, but it ''is'' in my watchlist (which I check regularly). As for "I wouldn't assume that you have no audience at that page - as you are going to be a candidate at RFA all the regulars at RFA will scrutinize it." It would only be an audience after the fact (i.e. at my next RfA) and anything truly problematic can be oversighted in a hurry. I would expect [[User:TomPhan]] to use his usual route of block evasion and not even use the page. Accordingly, it will probably only be used by legit users wishing to contact me. As far as I can see, it is win-win. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 03:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
541432 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541429 +++$+++ 541431 +++$+++ 2009-06-02 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.243939680E09 +++$+++ BTW, thanks for the feedback! <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ :::BTW, thanks for the feedback! <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 03:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

279289 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-28 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.127963700E09 +++$+++ Well It's finally happened. I've been [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Footnote3&diff=24237887&oldid=24230242 accused of vandalism]. Maybe I was too empowered by my first [[Wikipedia:Meetup\/Boston|Boston wiki-meetup]]. So perhaps I will blame it all on [[user:Sj|Sj]]. Now I know how it feels &mdash; not so good. Oh well I guess it had to happen eventually. But it is a new and rather unpleasant wiki-experience. Anyone want to ban me now? (Oleg? have you blocked anyone yet? this might be a good test)  I know that first time vandals don't usually warrant banning but I think I'm a special case. Don't you?  +++$+++ Well It's finally happened. I've been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Footnote3&diff=24237887&oldid=24230242 accused of vandalism]. Maybe I was too empowered by my first [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Boston|Boston wiki-meetup]]. So perhaps I will blame it all on [[user:Sj|Sj]]. Now I know how it feels &mdash; not so good. Oh well I guess it had to happen eventually. But it is a new and rather unpleasant wiki-experience. Anyone want to ban me now? (Oleg? have you blocked anyone yet? this might be a good test)  I know that first time vandals don't usually warrant banning but I think I'm a special case. Don't you? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:15, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
279290 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279289 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-09-28 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.127965080E09 +++$+++ Yes, I am looking forward to banning somebody, just for practice. You know, there is a first in everything. And why not you be the first person I will block? But Paul, do you really want me to do that to you? I mean are you really sure? If I block you, and then you realize you don't really want to be blocked, if you are starting having a withdrawal from not being able to edit, how will you Paul notify me that you want to be unblocked, as you will be blocked and won't be able to edit?!? So think about it Paul. Its like jumping from the bridge, you know. You are half-way through and then you want to live, but its too late! Think about it.  +++$+++ :: Yes, I am looking forward to banning somebody, just for practice. You know, there is a first in everything. And why not you be the first person I will block? But Paul, do you really want me to do that to you? I mean are you really sure? If I block you, and then you realize you don't really want to be blocked, if you are starting having a withdrawal from not being able to edit, how will you Paul notify me that you want to be unblocked, as you will be blocked and won't be able to edit?!? So think about it Paul. Its like jumping from the bridge, you know. You are half-way through and then you want to live, but its too late! Think about it. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] 20:38, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
279291 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279289 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-09-29 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.127980140E09 +++$+++ OK, OK, I will ban you if you insist. But don't be selfish, and indeed finish with the PM project first. Of the 4000 articles there, at least three thousand need reviewing I guess. Talk to you again in a couple of years.  +++$+++ :::: OK, OK, I will ban you if you insist. But don't be selfish, and indeed finish with the PM project first. Of the 4000 articles there, at least three thousand need reviewing I guess. Talk to you again in a couple of years. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] 00:49, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
279292 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279289 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-09-29 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.128040560E09 +++$+++ Ok, I will hold you to your promise, but at the rate that [[User:Jtwdog|Jtwdog]] is reviewing articles, it will not be in a couple of years, but rather a couple of days ;-)  +++$+++ ::::: Ok, I will hold you to your promise, but at the rate that [[User:Jtwdog|Jtwdog]] is reviewing articles, it will not be in a couple of years, but rather a couple of days ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:36, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
279293 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279289 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-10-02 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.128300960E09 +++$+++ And now I've deleted AfD! (no ''an'' AfD, not ''the'' Afd), see [[#Whoops!|below]]. Oleg: I really think I may need banning soon.  +++$+++ ::::::  And now I've deleted AfD! (no ''an'' AfD, not ''the'' Afd), see [[#Whoops!|below]]. Oleg: I really think I may need banning soon. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:56, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

614527 +++$+++ Delfinophile +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-15 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.155676440E09 +++$+++ Daniel, at your request I will take my argument to your talk page, for now. As for your claim that it is \"not my place\" to modify your userpage, I refer you to [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|WP:WWN]]: ''\"Your user page is not a personal homepage, nor is it a [[blog]]. More importantly, your user page is '''not yours'''.\"'' Now that I've established that your user page does not belong to you, I want to reiterate that I take offensive to your claim that you speak Dolphin. It simply isn't true, nor is it verifiable. More importantly, it is inappropriate for your userpage: it is not relevant. I also refer you to [[WP:USERPAGE]]: ''\"If you have material...that is otherwise inappropriate for Wikipedia, it should be placed on a personal website.\"'' You don't speak dolphin. If you want to say that you do, put it on your MySpace page, not here. Reading further, you will learn that inappropriate content is considered to be ''\"other things pertaining to 'entertainment' rather than 'writing an encyclopedia'.\"'' You have that there because you get a kick out of it, not because it is relevant to Wikipedia's goals. If you still somehow feel that this should stay, then you ought to continue reading because the article goes on to say, ''\"material that does not somehow further the goals of the project may be removed.\"'' Who may remove it exactly? Well, as you said yourself, it is often best to let the user make the change himself, but as you have now been made aware, ''\"pages in user space still do belong to the community...other users may edit pages in your user space.\"'' I have the right to change that content, but I am asking you to please change it yourself. I do apologize for not having brought this issue up here in the first place. However, your duty is clear: If another user such as myself ''\"lets you know that they would rather you deleted some or other content from your user space, you should probably do so\"''. I await your response.  +++$+++ Daniel, at your request I will take my argument to your talk page, for now. As for your claim that it is "not my place" to modify your userpage, I refer you to [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|WP:WWN]]: ''"Your user page is not a personal homepage, nor is it a [[blog]]. More importantly, your user page is '''not yours'''."'' Now that I've established that your user page does not belong to you, I want to reiterate that I take offensive to your claim that you speak Dolphin. It simply isn't true, nor is it verifiable. More importantly, it is inappropriate for your userpage: it is not relevant. I also refer you to [[WP:USERPAGE]]: ''"If you have material...that is otherwise inappropriate for Wikipedia, it should be placed on a personal website."'' You don't speak dolphin. If you want to say that you do, put it on your MySpace page, not here. Reading further, you will learn that inappropriate content is considered to be ''"other things pertaining to 'entertainment' rather than 'writing an encyclopedia'."'' You have that there because you get a kick out of it, not because it is relevant to Wikipedia's goals. If you still somehow feel that this should stay, then you ought to continue reading because the article goes on to say, ''"material that does not somehow further the goals of the project may be removed."'' Who may remove it exactly? Well, as you said yourself, it is often best to let the user make the change himself, but as you have now been made aware, ''"pages in user space still do belong to the community...other users may edit pages in your user space."'' I have the right to change that content, but I am asking you to please change it yourself. I do apologize for not having brought this issue up here in the first place. However, your duty is clear: If another user such as myself ''"lets you know that they would rather you deleted some or other content from your user space, you should probably do so"''. I await your response. [[User:Delfinophile|Delfinophile]] 14:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
614528 +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614527 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-15 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.155678540E09 +++$+++ Wow, you're really hooked on this dolphin thing. First of all, not everything on Wikipedia is 100% serious, least of all userpages. I refer you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere\/Template:Humor&limit=100&from=0 here], which shows many pages in the Wikipedia namespace that are humorous and not designed to be part of the encyclopedia. Furthermore, I find the fact that you created an account solely to remove content from my userpage very suspicious (4 of your 6 edits so far). I'm leaving it up there. ''Squeeeeeeeeak''. -- +++$+++ ::Wow, you're really hooked on this dolphin thing. First of all, not everything on Wikipedia is 100% serious, least of all userpages. I refer you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Humor&limit=100&from=0 here], which shows many pages in the Wikipedia namespace that are humorous and not designed to be part of the encyclopedia. Furthermore, I find the fact that you created an account solely to remove content from my userpage very suspicious (4 of your 6 edits so far). I'm leaving it up there. ''Squeeeeeeeeak''. --[[User:Daniel Olsen|Daniel Olsen]] 14:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
614529 +++$+++ Budgiekiller +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614527 +++$+++ 614527 +++$+++ 2006-08-15 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.155685500E09 +++$+++ We can all communicate with dolphins.  I have, in New Zealand, so I think you need to relax a bit about it.  Daniel, [[:Category:User dlph|you are not alone...]]!   +++$+++ :We can all communicate with dolphins.  I have, in New Zealand, so I think you need to relax a bit about it.  Daniel, [[:Category:User dlph|you are not alone...]]!  [[User:Budgiekiller|Budgiekiller]] 16:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
614530 +++$+++ Moriori +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614527 +++$+++ 614529 +++$+++ 2006-08-16 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.155712440E09 +++$+++ Anyone can post on their userpage information about their areas of expertise. It says so [[Wikipedia:User page|here]]. If Daniel says part of his expertise is speaking Dolphin, then amen!   +++$+++ ::Anyone can post on their userpage information about their areas of expertise. It says so [[Wikipedia:User page|here]]. If Daniel says part of his expertise is speaking Dolphin, then amen!  [[User:Moriori|Moriori]] 00:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

17148 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17148 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-13 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.163439060E09 +++$+++ You changed Hommage to Homage in [[Niels-Henning \xd8rsted Pedersen]]. I have reverted. The album ''is'' actually called Hommage. Please ensure that your valuable botting activities don't change it again. Thanks.  +++$+++ You changed Hommage to Homage in [[Niels-Henning Ørsted Pedersen]]. I have reverted. The album ''is'' actually called Hommage. Please ensure that your valuable botting activities don't change it again. Thanks. [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] 09:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
17149 +++$+++ CmdrObot +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17148 +++$+++ 17148 +++$+++ 2006-11-13 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.163486520E09 +++$+++ Ta H. I've made note of it. Cheers,  +++$+++ : Ta H. I've made note of it. Cheers, [[User:CmdrObot|CmdrObot]] 22:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

279297 +++$+++ Redwolf24 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-01 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.128157980E09 +++$+++ You deleted Evanss's AfD, and not the article! Haha, its fine though, and restored. [[User:Redwolf24|<font color=\"darkblue\">R<\/font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ You deleted Evanss's AfD, and not the article! Haha, its fine though, and restored. [[User:Redwolf24|<font color="darkblue">R</font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Redwolf24|<font color="darkblue">dwolf24</font>]] ([[User talk:Redwolf24|talk]]) 02:13, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
279298 +++$+++ Redwolf24 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279297 +++$+++ 279297 +++$+++ 2005-10-01 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.128158040E09 +++$+++ I got the article too. [[User:Redwolf24|<font color=\"darkblue\">R<\/font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ :I got the article too. [[User:Redwolf24|<font color="darkblue">R</font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Redwolf24|<font color="darkblue">dwolf24</font>]] ([[User talk:Redwolf24|talk]]) 02:14, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
279299 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279297 +++$+++ 279297 +++$+++ 2005-10-01 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.128158580E09 +++$+++ Ooops. I guess I shouldn't try to close AfD's when I'm tired and watching the Red Sox-Yankees game all at the same time ;-). Thanks for catching my boo boo. I was acuused for the first time of vandalisng an article (see above) and now this. I think I may need to be banned soon ;-).   +++$+++ :Ooops. I guess I shouldn't try to close AfD's when I'm tired and watching the Red Sox-Yankees game all at the same time ;-). Thanks for catching my boo boo. I was acuused for the first time of vandalisng an article (see above) and now this. I think I may need to be banned soon ;-).  [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:23, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
279300 +++$+++ Redwolf24 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279297 +++$+++ 279299 +++$+++ 2005-10-01 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.128160260E09 +++$+++ {{tl|indefblockuser}} pwnafied. [[User:Redwolf24|<font color=\"darkblue\">R<\/font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::{{tl|indefblockuser}} pwnafied. [[User:Redwolf24|<font color="darkblue">R</font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Redwolf24|<font color="darkblue">dwolf24</font>]] ([[User talk:Redwolf24|talk]]) 02:51, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

17156 +++$+++ Tassedethe +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17156 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-03 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.238803320E09 +++$+++ On the [[Ulrik]] page you replaced {{tl|given name}} with {{tl|hndis}}. It states on the hndis documentation page \"''A page that lists all people with the given name \"Jayson\" should use <nowiki>{{given name}}<\/nowiki>.''\" As this page doesnt have multiple people just called Ulrik, and only people with the given name Ulrik, then the given name template is surely the correct one?  +++$+++ On the [[Ulrik]] page you replaced {{tl|given name}} with {{tl|hndis}}. It states on the hndis documentation page "''A page that lists all people with the given name "Jayson" should use <nowiki>{{given name}}</nowiki>.''" As this page doesnt have multiple people just called Ulrik, and only people with the given name Ulrik, then the given name template is surely the correct one? [[User:Tassedethe|Tassedethe]] ([[User talk:Tassedethe|talk]]) 17:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
17157 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17156 +++$+++ 17156 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.238816220E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure. The \"hndis\" generates the text \"This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same personal name\" which is what the Ulrik page is. When I put \"given name\" on a page, it then gets tagged as uncategorised, but when I put \"hndis\" it doesn't. That's why I changed \"given name\" to \"hndis\". Is \"personal name\" the same as \"given name\"? Why does a page tagged \"given name\" get labelled as uncategorised? It's all rather confusing... --  +++$+++ :I'm not sure. The "hndis" generates the text "This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same personal name" which is what the Ulrik page is. When I put "given name" on a page, it then gets tagged as uncategorised, but when I put "hndis" it doesn't. That's why I changed "given name" to "hndis". Is "personal name" the same as "given name"? Why does a page tagged "given name" get labelled as uncategorised? It's all rather confusing... -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
17158 +++$+++ Tassedethe +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17156 +++$+++ 17157 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.238822520E09 +++$+++ I think 2 things are occuring here. There was a major edit to the given name template in January which I think has broken the categorization of given names. I am asking the editor to look at their edits. Also I think the hndis message is ambiguous, which is unfortunate for a disambiguation template! \"Given name\" seems unambiguous (synonymous with Christian name), \"Surname\" is unambiguous (synonymous with family name), but hndis should really refer to \"full name\". When it says \"''associated with the same personal name''\" that could mean \"given name\" (as you have thought) or \"full name\" (which is what I think is meant). \"Full name\" makes sense in the context of \"given name\" and \"surname\". If hndis also meant \"given name\" then there would be no need to have 2 separate templates. I think a wider discussion to clarify the hndis template is needed.  +++$+++ ::I think 2 things are occuring here. There was a major edit to the given name template in January which I think has broken the categorization of given names. I am asking the editor to look at their edits. Also I think the hndis message is ambiguous, which is unfortunate for a disambiguation template! "Given name" seems unambiguous (synonymous with Christian name), "Surname" is unambiguous (synonymous with family name), but hndis should really refer to "full name". When it says "''associated with the same personal name''" that could mean "given name" (as you have thought) or "full name" (which is what I think is meant). "Full name" makes sense in the context of "given name" and "surname". If hndis also meant "given name" then there would be no need to have 2 separate templates. I think a wider discussion to clarify the hndis template is needed. [[User:Tassedethe|Tassedethe]] ([[User talk:Tassedethe|talk]]) 22:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
17159 +++$+++ Tassedethe +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17156 +++$+++ 17157 +++$+++ 2009-04-04 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.238851800E09 +++$+++ I started a [[Template talk:Hndis#Propose changing wording|discussion]] on the hndis page .  +++$+++ ::I started a [[Template talk:Hndis#Propose changing wording|discussion]] on the hndis page . [[User:Tassedethe|Tassedethe]] ([[User talk:Tassedethe|talk]]) 06:30, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
17160 +++$+++ Tassedethe +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17156 +++$+++ 17159 +++$+++ 2009-04-10 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.239378540E09 +++$+++ Someone has fixed the template {{tl|given name}} so you should be able to add it to appropriate pages and get the correct category. There is more info on name disambiguation pages at [[MOS:DABNAME]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::Someone has fixed the template {{tl|given name}} so you should be able to add it to appropriate pages and get the correct category. There is more info on name disambiguation pages at [[MOS:DABNAME]]. Thanks. [[User:Tassedethe|Tassedethe]] ([[User talk:Tassedethe|talk]]) 08:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

279301 +++$+++ Matia.gr +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-01 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.128189960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Matia.gr|+MATIA]]  <small>[[User talk:Matia.gr|&#9742;]]</small> 11:06, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
279302 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279301 +++$+++ 279301 +++$+++ 2005-10-01 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.128205260E09 +++$+++ I'm glad you liked my little joke &mdash; I am puzzled by the \"strange\" looks though. As for Thebans and Alexander, I'm certainly intereted, but not sure I have anything to contribute there. I think Aldux is your man. I am just a lowly man of numbers, who only aspires to be a man of letters ;-) &mdash;  +++$+++ :I'm glad you liked my little joke &mdash; I am puzzled by the "strange" looks though. As for Thebans and Alexander, I'm certainly intereted, but not sure I have anything to contribute there. I think Aldux is your man. I am just a lowly man of numbers, who only aspires to be a man of letters ;-) &mdash; [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:21, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
279303 +++$+++ Matia.gr +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279301 +++$+++ 279302 +++$+++ 2005-10-01 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.128208440E09 +++$+++ Aldux has already made some nice contributions on Alexander - he is good and quick :)  +++$+++ ::Aldux has already made some nice contributions on Alexander - he is good and quick :) [[User:Matia.gr|+MATIA]]  <small>[[User talk:Matia.gr|&#9742;]]</small> 16:14, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

279304 +++$+++ Sj +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-02 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.128254580E09 +++$+++ Hello Paul, it was good to see you last week.  If you have specific ideas about how we could develop a Wikimania schedule, or interested people and orgs we could make connections with, please add comments to the [[m:Wikimania_2006\/Boston|bid page]] or talk page.  We're having a collective discussion about the current bids tomorrow on IRC in #wikimania (at 20:00 UTC, I believe).   Cheers,  +++$+++ Hello Paul, it was good to see you last week.  If you have specific ideas about how we could develop a Wikimania schedule, or interested people and orgs we could make connections with, please add comments to the [[m:Wikimania_2006/Boston|bid page]] or talk page.  We're having a collective discussion about the current bids tomorrow on IRC in #wikimania (at 20:00 UTC, I believe).   Cheers, [[User:Sj|+sj ]][[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 05:03, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
279305 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279304 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-10-02 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.128300420E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sj.  +++$+++ :::Thanks Sj. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:47, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

265004 +++$+++ 199.125.109.73 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-12 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.184303880E09 +++$+++ Why do you think the dates are important?  There are no other charts showing insolation for other years, and it was measured over 10 years ago.  By the way the forecasted area was for 2003, not 2010, but what year it was forecast for is moot because the tiny dots would look the same if it was 2003, 2010, 2020, or even 2050.  So I assume you are saying that the 1991-1993 dates are the ones that are important to you.  Please explain why.  +++$+++ Why do you think the dates are important?  There are no other charts showing insolation for other years, and it was measured over 10 years ago.  By the way the forecasted area was for 2003, not 2010, but what year it was forecast for is moot because the tiny dots would look the same if it was 2003, 2010, 2020, or even 2050.  So I assume you are saying that the 1991-1993 dates are the ones that are important to you.  Please explain why. [[User:199.125.109.73|199.125.109.73]] 22:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
265005 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265004 +++$+++ 265004 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.184344320E09 +++$+++ The dates are what makes it a piece of research and not just propaganda. The years of measurement are important because as climate changes then cloud cover will also chnage and so will the map. The black dots would look very different in 1992 or 2050 because  there is exponential growth of energy useage.  We have to give the reader some idea of the context of the map.  +++$+++ :The dates are what makes it a piece of research and not just propaganda. The years of measurement are important because as climate changes then cloud cover will also chnage and so will the map. The black dots would look very different in 1992 or 2050 because  there is exponential growth of energy useage.  We have to give the reader some idea of the context of the map. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 09:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
265006 +++$+++ 199.125.109.56 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265004 +++$+++ 265005 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.184359320E09 +++$+++ Nonesense.  +++$+++ ::Nonesense. [[User:199.125.109.56|199.125.109.56]] 13:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

279307 +++$+++ Davidpdx +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279307 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I'd appreciate it if you could leave me an answer on my talk page [[User talk:Davidpdx|here]]. Thanks...  +++$+++ I'd appreciate it if you could leave me an answer on my talk page [[User talk:Davidpdx|here]]. Thanks... [[User:Davidpdx|Davidpdx]] 10/3/05 8:42 (UTC)
279308 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279307 +++$+++ 279307 +++$+++ 2005-10-03 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.128377640E09 +++$+++ Hi David. The purpose of an AfD discussion is to determine whether there is a consensus for deletion or not. Regarding the AfD of [[Ecclesiastical state]], by my reading, there were six editors who were in favor of deleting the article and  nine who were not (any recommendation other than delete is a recommendation to keep, for example a redirect is a particular kind of keep). Thus there was clearly no consensus for deletion. And, although there was a majority to keep, it was not large enough (in my view - there is no set amount) to call it a consensus. Nevertheless, a lack of consensus to delete means the article will be kept by default. However the article can still be redirected. And assuming that those editors who recommended deletion would support redirection, there does seem to be a consensus for redirection. However, such a decision is a normal editorial decision and doesn't involve AfD. If you want to redirect the page, you could propose the redirection on the talk page first, or you could be bold and simply redirect, in either case, citing the AfD discussion as justification. Does that make sense? Have I answered your questions? If anything I wrote wasn't clear, or you have other questions, I'd be happy to try and answer them.  +++$+++ :Hi David. The purpose of an AfD discussion is to determine whether there is a consensus for deletion or not. Regarding the AfD of [[Ecclesiastical state]], by my reading, there were six editors who were in favor of deleting the article and  nine who were not (any recommendation other than delete is a recommendation to keep, for example a redirect is a particular kind of keep). Thus there was clearly no consensus for deletion. And, although there was a majority to keep, it was not large enough (in my view - there is no set amount) to call it a consensus. Nevertheless, a lack of consensus to delete means the article will be kept by default. However the article can still be redirected. And assuming that those editors who recommended deletion would support redirection, there does seem to be a consensus for redirection. However, such a decision is a normal editorial decision and doesn't involve AfD. If you want to redirect the page, you could propose the redirection on the talk page first, or you could be bold and simply redirect, in either case, citing the AfD discussion as justification. Does that make sense? Have I answered your questions? If anything I wrote wasn't clear, or you have other questions, I'd be happy to try and answer them. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:14, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
279309 +++$+++ Davidpdx +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279307 +++$+++ 279308 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Paul, thanks for the information. I'm fairly new, so some of this is on a learning curve for me. I liked your suggestion about redirecting. A few people mentioned a locked redirect. How possible is that? Thanks again for your help.  +++$+++ ::Paul, thanks for the information. I'm fairly new, so some of this is on a learning curve for me. I liked your suggestion about redirecting. A few people mentioned a locked redirect. How possible is that? Thanks again for your help. [[User:Davidpdx|Davidpdx]] 10/3/05 0:31 (UTC)
279310 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279307 +++$+++ 279307 +++$+++ 2005-10-04 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.128413580E09 +++$+++ You're welcome David. Don't worry we were all new once. It is possible for any admin to \"protect\" a page, which means that no one can edit the page (except for another admin). This is done rarely, reluctantly, and only as a last resort. For the policy on page protection and how to go about requesting it see [[Wikipedia:Protected page]]. If you have any other questions don't hesitate to ask.  +++$+++ :You're welcome David. Don't worry we were all new once. It is possible for any admin to "protect" a page, which means that no one can edit the page (except for another admin). This is done rarely, reluctantly, and only as a last resort. For the policy on page protection and how to go about requesting it see [[Wikipedia:Protected page]]. If you have any other questions don't hesitate to ask. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 01:13, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

17164 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-17 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.242617160E09 +++$+++ Hi again, I have checked the diffs myself and I have blocked this bot indefinitely. In my view it is deleting valid links. The owner's response to my initial enquiry was not very helpful. Graham.  +++$+++ Hi again, I have checked the diffs myself and I have blocked this bot indefinitely. In my view it is deleting valid links. The owner's response to my initial enquiry was not very helpful. Graham. [[User:GrahamColm|Graham <font color="blue">Colm</font>]] [[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:26, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
17165 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17164 +++$+++ 17164 +++$+++ 2009-05-17 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.242619080E09 +++$+++ Thanks Graham. I was getting more than a little frustrated after spending hours creating pages and carefully searching for interwiki links by hand, only to have them zapped by a bot. At last, a bit of peace. --  +++$+++ :Thanks Graham. I was getting more than a little frustrated after spending hours creating pages and carefully searching for interwiki links by hand, only to have them zapped by a bot. At last, a bit of peace. -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
17166 +++$+++ GrahamColm +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17164 +++$+++ 17165 +++$+++ 2009-05-17 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.242620400E09 +++$+++ You are welcome, I am still learning this admin stuff\u2014I prefer to write about [[Virus|viruses]]\u2014but I think I have made the right call in this case. Best wishes, Graham. +++$+++ ::You are welcome, I am still learning this admin stuff—I prefer to write about [[Virus|viruses]]—but I think I have made the right call in this case. Best wishes, Graham.[[User:GrahamColm|Graham <font color="blue">Colm</font>]] [[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:20, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

541454 +++$+++ DinajGao +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-17 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.245264720E09 +++$+++ Hello there thanks for the message but sorry I disagree to what you are saying, I have actually added references to most of the names of the people after I have reverted the edits, you removed it and you weren't even bothered to add refs to the lists instead, but at least I tried to improve the article and you give me a message to say I will be blocked if I add un sourced material??? please look at the edits that I have contributed and then review what I have done then comment. Please stop removing the names, I am still working on the article by adding those missing refs, really not helping mate, really appreciate if you don't revert the edits. Thank you!  +++$+++ Hello there thanks for the message but sorry I disagree to what you are saying, I have actually added references to most of the names of the people after I have reverted the edits, you removed it and you weren't even bothered to add refs to the lists instead, but at least I tried to improve the article and you give me a message to say I will be blocked if I add un sourced material??? please look at the edits that I have contributed and then review what I have done then comment. Please stop removing the names, I am still working on the article by adding those missing refs, really not helping mate, really appreciate if you don't revert the edits. Thank you! [[User:DinajGao|DinajGao]] ([[User talk:DinajGao|talk]]) 11:52, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
541455 +++$+++ DinajGao +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541454 +++$+++ 541454 +++$+++ 2009-06-18 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.245375300E09 +++$+++ I have replaced back all the names which you have removed in the article, all backed up with references, next time either try to help find references or don't delete them.  +++$+++ : I have replaced back all the names which you have removed in the article, all backed up with references, next time either try to help find references or don't delete them. [[User:DinajGao|DinajGao]] ([[User talk:DinajGao|talk]]) 18:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
541456 +++$+++ DinajGao +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541454 +++$+++ 541455 +++$+++ 2009-06-18 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.245376260E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much, always willing to help :)  +++$+++ :: Thank you very much, always willing to help :) [[User:DinajGao|DinajGao]] ([[User talk:DinajGao|talk]]) 18:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

17167 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-25 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.243264860E09 +++$+++ Thank you for this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FJohn_Ng&diff=292183534&oldid=292183045 diff]. I was beginning to feel like I was holding one lone candle... in the growing darkness of a very windy night... my flickering flame threatening to flutter out. My own arrival on Wikipedia was inside the heart of a raging storm, so I can feel a newcomer's angst. ''' +++$+++ Thank you for this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FJohn_Ng&diff=292183534&oldid=292183045 diff]. I was beginning to feel like I was holding one lone candle... in the growing darkness of a very windy night... my flickering flame threatening to flutter out. My own arrival on Wikipedia was inside the heart of a raging storm, so I can feel a newcomer's angst. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 08:21, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
17168 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ 2009-05-25 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.243305600E09 +++$+++ My feelings were similar when you appeared on the scene. I find your approach so refreshing and reassuring. Some editors seem to expect a new article to spring forth fully formed, referenced, conforming to every policy, with impeccable grammar, structure, spelling, expressed succinctly and displaying no point of view, bias or conflict of interest. However, I'm of the opinion that the great strength of a wiki is that it allows collaborative authoring, so that the germ of an idea can be worked up co-operatively, pooling everyone's skills to produce something outstanding. Unfortunately, some editors' skills seem limited to deleting stubs as soon as they appear, confounding this creative process. It's particularly unfortunate when the contributor is new to Wikipedia, and when the reasons for deletion are not totally rational. --  +++$+++ :My feelings were similar when you appeared on the scene. I find your approach so refreshing and reassuring. Some editors seem to expect a new article to spring forth fully formed, referenced, conforming to every policy, with impeccable grammar, structure, spelling, expressed succinctly and displaying no point of view, bias or conflict of interest. However, I'm of the opinion that the great strength of a wiki is that it allows collaborative authoring, so that the germ of an idea can be worked up co-operatively, pooling everyone's skills to produce something outstanding. Unfortunately, some editors' skills seem limited to deleting stubs as soon as they appear, confounding this creative process. It's particularly unfortunate when the contributor is new to Wikipedia, and when the reasons for deletion are not totally rational. -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 19:40, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
17169 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ 17168 +++$+++ 2009-05-27 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.243485480E09 +++$+++ Thank you. My own motto is \"I'd rather fix the damn pipe than complain about having wet feet.\"  ''' +++$+++ ::Thank you. My own motto is "I'd rather fix the damn pipe than complain about having wet feet."  '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 21:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
17170 +++$+++ Cookiki +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ 2009-05-30 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.243693560E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your help! I won't hesitate to ask you questions if I have. Once again, thank you.  +++$+++ :Thank you for your help! I won't hesitate to ask you questions if I have. Once again, thank you. [[User:Cookiki|Cookiki]] ([[User talk:Cookiki|talk]]) 07:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
17171 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ 2009-05-30 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.243739220E09 +++$+++ Joan, that's an interesting idea, but leaves me wondering why. Have you read the articles that Wikipedia already has? For example, [[Space advocacy]], [[Space exploration]], [[Space colonization]], [[Space and survival]], and many others linked from those, seem to provide a very comprehensive treatment of why we should explore space. I haven't quite understood why you think Wikipedia needs another article, or what's missing from the ones it already has.  +++$+++ :Joan, that's an interesting idea, but leaves me wondering why. Have you read the articles that Wikipedia already has? For example, [[Space advocacy]], [[Space exploration]], [[Space colonization]], [[Space and survival]], and many others linked from those, seem to provide a very comprehensive treatment of why we should explore space. I haven't quite understood why you think Wikipedia needs another article, or what's missing from the ones it already has. [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
17172 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ 17169 +++$+++ 2009-06-06 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.244346900E09 +++$+++ I see. I'm not sure whether Wikipedia has a place for pages like this. It isn't a disambiguation page, or one of the \"List of ...\" pages. Please point me to other wikipedia pages similar to what you have in mind. I don't recall seeing any pages that simplify topics to the extent that they just give the top 5 reasons for and against something. --  +++$+++ :::I see. I'm not sure whether Wikipedia has a place for pages like this. It isn't a disambiguation page, or one of the "List of ..." pages. Please point me to other wikipedia pages similar to what you have in mind. I don't recall seeing any pages that simplify topics to the extent that they just give the top 5 reasons for and against something. -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
17173 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ 2009-07-09 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.247146320E09 +++$+++ I think we may have come to a conclusion on this one - that a suitable search can often produce you a screenful of links of the type you are envisaging. And if you think Wikipedia is biased, the great strength of the wiki idea is that you can help to rebalance it by writing the missing articles \u2013 from a neutral point of view, of course ;-)  +++$+++ :I think we may have come to a conclusion on this one - that a suitable search can often produce you a screenful of links of the type you are envisaging. And if you think Wikipedia is biased, the great strength of the wiki idea is that you can help to rebalance it by writing the missing articles – from a neutral point of view, of course ;-) [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 06:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
17174 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ 17167 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.244386020E09 +++$+++ Hope that makes some sense. Best regards and thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :Hope that makes some sense. Best regards and thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia. [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 07:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

279312 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279312 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-05 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.128507720E09 +++$+++ As for errors in our articles, it would be best to deal with particular statements in particular articles. I hope some of the above helps. I have taken an interest in the set theory articles, simply because they seemed a bit neglected. As far as I know you are the only set theorist, actively working on WP, and as far as I'm concerned, you should feel free to rework the set theory content, as you see fit. Always being prepared of course to defend your edits tooth and nail, with lots of authoritative sources, against every manner of assault from every possible direction ;-)  +++$+++ As for errors in our articles, it would be best to deal with particular statements in particular articles. I hope some of the above helps. I have taken an interest in the set theory articles, simply because they seemed a bit neglected. As far as I know you are the only set theorist, actively working on WP, and as far as I'm concerned, you should feel free to rework the set theory content, as you see fit. Always being prepared of course to defend your edits tooth and nail, with lots of authoritative sources, against every manner of assault from every possible direction ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
279313 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279312 +++$+++ 279312 +++$+++ 2005-10-05 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.128509340E09 +++$+++ It's a big job (many many articles), and I'm not really sure where to find references. Most of my textbooks don't deal much with philosophy or history; Kunen does, a little, but probably not in a way that's useful to me. I might have to find some Maddy papers or locate a copy of Drake. And it really ''isn't'' what I ought to be spending time on now. -- +++$+++ :It's a big job (many many articles), and I'm not really sure where to find references. Most of my textbooks don't deal much with philosophy or history; Kunen does, a little, but probably not in a way that's useful to me. I might have to find some Maddy papers or locate a copy of Drake. And it really ''isn't'' what I ought to be spending time on now. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 03:49, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
279314 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279312 +++$+++ 279313 +++$+++ 2005-10-05 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.128511320E09 +++$+++ You have other things to do besides Wikipedia !? Ok, I understand. We will all just do do the best we can. I will keep chipping away at it, and maybe someday I will understand enough to fix it all. It will, nevertheless, all get sorted out eventually. I appreciate your thoughtful critique, Trovatore.  +++$+++ ::You have other things to do besides Wikipedia !? Ok, I understand. We will all just do do the best we can. I will keep chipping away at it, and maybe someday I will understand enough to fix it all. It will, nevertheless, all get sorted out eventually. I appreciate your thoughtful critique, Trovatore. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

279315 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-05 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.128516960E09 +++$+++ Specifically, one model M of ZFC can be inferior to another model N, by failing to contain a subset of a set they both share, when N ''does'' have that subset. (This is after suitable cross-model identification; that's a technical annoyance that I don't want to address at the moment.) If you insist on sticking to models that completely ''maximize'' the powersets of all the sets they have, then that's when you get the categoricity result I alluded to above. In particular, for example, all such models will agree on the truth value of CH, and that must be the ''real'' truth value of CH. -- +++$+++ Specifically, one model M of ZFC can be inferior to another model N, by failing to contain a subset of a set they both share, when N ''does'' have that subset. (This is after suitable cross-model identification; that's a technical annoyance that I don't want to address at the moment.) If you insist on sticking to models that completely ''maximize'' the powersets of all the sets they have, then that's when you get the categoricity result I alluded to above. In particular, for example, all such models will agree on the truth value of CH, and that must be the ''real'' truth value of CH. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 05:56, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
279316 +++$+++ Arthur Rubin +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279315 +++$+++ 279315 +++$+++ 2005-10-05 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.128544620E09 +++$+++ In re '''inferior''', I'm afraid that last is a ''naive'' interpretation of set theory, once you deal with [[forcing (mathematics)|forcing]] or [[Boolean-valued model]]s (''stub'') of set theory, which can introduce new objects which do not \"really\" exist. (And I do know something about this -- or at least what it was about in 1976.  My proposed thesis was on algebraic (or what would be algebraic, when dealing with infinitary operations) characteristics of Boolean algebras and properties of the corresponding Boolean-valued models.  Unfortunately, my advisor didn't get tenure, so I had to choose a different topic.)  Unfortunately for the wikipedial article on Boolean-valued models, I don't know what's been done since then, so most of what I could write on that topic would be original research.   +++$+++ :In re '''inferior''', I'm afraid that last is a ''naive'' interpretation of set theory, once you deal with [[forcing (mathematics)|forcing]] or [[Boolean-valued model]]s (''stub'') of set theory, which can introduce new objects which do not "really" exist. (And I do know something about this -- or at least what it was about in 1976.  My proposed thesis was on algebraic (or what would be algebraic, when dealing with infinitary operations) characteristics of Boolean algebras and properties of the corresponding Boolean-valued models.  Unfortunately, my advisor didn't get tenure, so I had to choose a different topic.)  Unfortunately for the wikipedial article on Boolean-valued models, I don't know what's been done since then, so most of what I could write on that topic would be original research.  [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] 13:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
279317 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279315 +++$+++ 279316 +++$+++ 2005-10-05 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.128559260E09 +++$+++ Now, it does seem to be a convenient mental\/linguistic tool to ''pretend'' that you're actually adding things to the universe. But it doesn't seem to work out well philosophically to conclude that you really are doing so. -- +++$+++ ::Now, it does seem to be a convenient mental/linguistic tool to ''pretend'' that you're actually adding things to the universe. But it doesn't seem to work out well philosophically to conclude that you really are doing so. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 17:41, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

17175 +++$+++ Lilaac +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17175 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-08 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.244518800E09 +++$+++ Do the given name pages that you're creating not need a <nowiki>{{disamb}}<\/nowiki> tag to be added since they have the given names tag? Thanks  +++$+++ Do the given name pages that you're creating not need a <nowiki>{{disamb}}</nowiki> tag to be added since they have the given names tag? Thanks [[User:Lilaac|Lilaac]] ([[User talk:Lilaac|talk]]) 20:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
17176 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17175 +++$+++ 17175 +++$+++ 2009-06-08 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.244519340E09 +++$+++ Discussions on this have been long and convoluted, and give rise to differences between different language wikipedias. If you're interested there's a recent discussion at [[MediaWiki talk:Disambiguationspage#Re-add_.7B.7Bsurname.7D.7D]]. Cheers -  +++$+++ :Discussions on this have been long and convoluted, and give rise to differences between different language wikipedias. If you're interested there's a recent discussion at [[MediaWiki talk:Disambiguationspage#Re-add_.7B.7Bsurname.7D.7D]]. Cheers - [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
17177 +++$+++ Lilaac +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17175 +++$+++ 17176 +++$+++ 2009-06-08 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.244519460E09 +++$+++ THanks for the letting me know, I was adding disamb tags behind you like a dumbo, let me go undo them :-( ...  +++$+++ ::THanks for the letting me know, I was adding disamb tags behind you like a dumbo, let me go undo them :-( ... [[User:Lilaac|Lilaac]] ([[User talk:Lilaac|talk]]) 20:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
17178 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17175 +++$+++ 17177 +++$+++ 2009-06-08 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.244519880E09 +++$+++ LOL :) I'd no idea I was being followed. It ''is'' confusing and I made all sorts of mistakes putting the wrong tag on when I first started making this type of page - and people kindly corrected me.  +++$+++ :::LOL :) I'd no idea I was being followed. It ''is'' confusing and I made all sorts of mistakes putting the wrong tag on when I first started making this type of page - and people kindly corrected me. [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

113591 +++$+++ Decora +++$+++ Bmclaughlin9 +++$+++ 113591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-12 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.299994680E09 +++$+++ I also argue that the idea that Obama has cracked down on leaks (in part using the [[Espionage Act]], a rarely used act) and I argue that this is notable and worthy of inclusion, because there are literally dozens of reports in major newspapers by mainstream journalists who make this statement in their articles. Please reconsider. Thank you.  +++$+++ I also argue that the idea that Obama has cracked down on leaks (in part using the [[Espionage Act]], a rarely used act) and I argue that this is notable and worthy of inclusion, because there are literally dozens of reports in major newspapers by mainstream journalists who make this statement in their articles. Please reconsider. Thank you. [[User:Decora|Decora]] ([[User talk:Decora|talk]]) 21:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
113592 +++$+++ Decora +++$+++ Bmclaughlin9 +++$+++ 113591 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.300011300E09 +++$+++ so what i need is an article talking about Obama and his unusually common use of the Espionage Act? I dont think there is a mainstream article out there yet that specifically daels with the act and Obama, but I think there will be one soon, as the Drake case comes to trial. Obama has used the law more than all the presidents before, combined.  more and more commentators are talking about the issue. especially if Tamm or Tice get indicted, things will come to a head imho. Manning, i may be wrong, but i believe he is under the UCMJ not the US Code so somehow it seems to me all of this is irrelevant to him.  +++$+++ :: so what i need is an article talking about Obama and his unusually common use of the Espionage Act? I dont think there is a mainstream article out there yet that specifically daels with the act and Obama, but I think there will be one soon, as the Drake case comes to trial. Obama has used the law more than all the presidents before, combined.  more and more commentators are talking about the issue. especially if Tamm or Tice get indicted, things will come to a head imho. Manning, i may be wrong, but i believe he is under the UCMJ not the US Code so somehow it seems to me all of this is irrelevant to him. [[User:Decora|Decora]] ([[User talk:Decora|talk]]) 03:15, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
113593 +++$+++ Decora +++$+++ Bmclaughlin9 +++$+++ 113591 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.300012320E09 +++$+++ RE btb Morrison, hes not the \"only offical convicted of giving classified info to reporters\", hes the 1st of 3. number 3 was leibowitz (in the [[Espionage Act]] article), and if Kim, and Sterling are convicted, it will be 4, 5,  all under Obama... and Drake, it wouldnt be 'giving classified info to a reporter' technically since hes only charged with retention. but it would still be 'in relation' to his communications with a reporter. Josh Gerstein at politico has been covering a lot of this:  ex: http:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/stories\/0510\/37721.html 5\/25\/10   +++$+++ :: RE btb Morrison, hes not the "only offical convicted of giving classified info to reporters", hes the 1st of 3. number 3 was leibowitz (in the [[Espionage Act]] article), and if Kim, and Sterling are convicted, it will be 4, 5,  all under Obama... and Drake, it wouldnt be 'giving classified info to a reporter' technically since hes only charged with retention. but it would still be 'in relation' to his communications with a reporter. Josh Gerstein at politico has been covering a lot of this:  ex: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37721.html 5/25/10  [[User:Decora|Decora]] ([[User talk:Decora|talk]]) 03:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
113594 +++$+++ Decora +++$+++ Bmclaughlin9 +++$+++ 113591 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.300085940E09 +++$+++ thats pretty funny there are two larry franlkin articles. what a mess. i still think eventually this will become so notable that it will have to be in the Obama article, maybe not today but someday. especially if there are convictions and\/or more indictments. good luck with your re org  +++$+++ :::thats pretty funny there are two larry franlkin articles. what a mess. i still think eventually this will become so notable that it will have to be in the Obama article, maybe not today but someday. especially if there are convictions and/or more indictments. good luck with your re org [[User:Decora|Decora]] ([[User talk:Decora|talk]]) 23:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
113595 +++$+++ Decora +++$+++ Bmclaughlin9 +++$+++ 113591 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-14 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.300087500E09 +++$+++ one thing about the Larry Franklin case is that he is actually accused of passing information to a group that passed it on to a foreign country. none of the other cases do that. they are all resulting from contacts with US journalists (or a blogger). maybe that is why its such an editorial mess, different emotions involved. plus it involves AIPAC which is a hot topic that people get emotional about. on the merge, well, one possibility might be to move 'larry franklin scandal' to 'US v Franklin' (or whatever the name of the court case is)... more informative and more neutral, imho....  i say that, having myself created a page with a title of 'xyz controversy'... maybe i should fix my own article! of course some people might argue the 'controversy' is more accurate, because the court case became a big thing in the media etc. i dunno.   +++$+++ :::: one thing about the Larry Franklin case is that he is actually accused of passing information to a group that passed it on to a foreign country. none of the other cases do that. they are all resulting from contacts with US journalists (or a blogger). maybe that is why its such an editorial mess, different emotions involved. plus it involves AIPAC which is a hot topic that people get emotional about. on the merge, well, one possibility might be to move 'larry franklin scandal' to 'US v Franklin' (or whatever the name of the court case is)... more informative and more neutral, imho....  i say that, having myself created a page with a title of 'xyz controversy'... maybe i should fix my own article! of course some people might argue the 'controversy' is more accurate, because the court case became a big thing in the media etc. i dunno.  [[User:Decora|Decora]] ([[User talk:Decora|talk]]) 00:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
113596 +++$+++ Decora +++$+++ Bmclaughlin9 +++$+++ 113591 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-14 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.300086360E09 +++$+++ nice work on the reagan section, very interesting. i thought about putting 'Obama' on the last 4 but alot of those prosecutions started under bush and obama continued them. '21st century' was the best i could think of but i have a feelnig there is some better way of organizing.  +++$+++ ::: nice work on the reagan section, very interesting. i thought about putting 'Obama' on the last 4 but alot of those prosecutions started under bush and obama continued them. '21st century' was the best i could think of but i have a feelnig there is some better way of organizing. [[User:Decora|Decora]] ([[User talk:Decora|talk]]) 00:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

279321 +++$+++ Mindspillage +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-06 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.128597360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your kind words. They mean a lot to me coming from you, an editor whose own work and opinions I think highly of; you're one of Wikipedia's best editors, in my opinion. (Not only for your thoughtful, reasonable discussions and clearly-written articles, but your terrible math jokes as well!) I'm honored at the compliment, and glad to see others endorsing the position.  +++$+++ Thanks for your kind words. They mean a lot to me coming from you, an editor whose own work and opinions I think highly of; you're one of Wikipedia's best editors, in my opinion. (Not only for your thoughtful, reasonable discussions and clearly-written articles, but your terrible math jokes as well!) I'm honored at the compliment, and glad to see others endorsing the position. [[User:Mindspillage|Mindspillage]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill yours?)]] 04:16, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
279322 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279321 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-10-07 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.128730560E09 +++$+++ Oleg I choose to think she meant \"terrible\" as in the French ''[[enfant terrible]]'', women, I'm told, like \"bad boys\" &mdash; not bad jokes!  +++$+++ ::Oleg I choose to think she meant "terrible" as in the French ''[[enfant terrible]]'', women, I'm told, like "bad boys" &mdash; not bad jokes! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:16, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
279323 +++$+++ Mindspillage +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279321 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-10-07 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.128754740E09 +++$+++ Only if you don't associate with the right sort of women! Which is fortunate for the august Paul, as I'd reserve the ''enfant terrible'' label for some other editors myself (if you'll pardon my French...)  +++$+++ :::Only if you don't associate with the right sort of women! Which is fortunate for the august Paul, as I'd reserve the ''enfant terrible'' label for some other editors myself (if you'll pardon my French...) [[User:Mindspillage|Mindspillage]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill yours?)]] 23:59, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
279324 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279321 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-10-08 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.128779760E09 +++$+++ First, the \"best wikipedia editor\", then the \"august Paul\". Gosh, ain't you blushing under that hat?  +++$+++ :::: First, the "best wikipedia editor", then the "august Paul". Gosh, ain't you blushing under that hat? [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 06:56, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
279325 +++$+++ Mindspillage +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279321 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-10-09 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.128841800E09 +++$+++ No, apparently I'm smiling like Mona Lisa, so I thought turnabout might be fair play! :-)  +++$+++ ::::: No, apparently I'm smiling like Mona Lisa, so I thought turnabout might be fair play! :-) [[User:Mindspillage|Mindspillage]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill yours?)]] 00:10, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
279326 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279321 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-10-09 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.128846060E09 +++$+++ Indeed, my fair lady!  +++$+++ :::::: Indeed, my fair lady! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 01:21, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

17179 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-16 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.245175020E09 +++$+++ How should we tackle this to prevent the many hundreds of <nowiki>{{surname}} and {{given name}}<\/nowiki> pages being given a totally inappropriate orphan tag?  +++$+++ How should we tackle this to prevent the many hundreds of <nowiki>{{surname}} and {{given name}}</nowiki> pages being given a totally inappropriate orphan tag? [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides|talk]]) 10:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
17180 +++$+++ Postcard Cathy +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17179 +++$+++ 17179 +++$+++ 2009-06-16 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.245211800E09 +++$+++ I am not an expert on either orphans or names.  The only thing I can think of, other than contacting someone who knows more than I do on orphans, is to make certain pages disamb articles.  Some articles on names are simply disamb articles.  Others are more specific, giving things like origins of the name and other historical\/factual info.  All I know is that as is, they keep popping up as orphaned pages needing tags.  If I don't tag them, a bot will.  So it is stupid to revert my edits.  If there is some sort of forum where you can ask people who know more about orphans, I suggest posting it there.   +++$+++ :I am not an expert on either orphans or names.  The only thing I can think of, other than contacting someone who knows more than I do on orphans, is to make certain pages disamb articles.  Some articles on names are simply disamb articles.  Others are more specific, giving things like origins of the name and other historical/factual info.  All I know is that as is, they keep popping up as orphaned pages needing tags.  If I don't tag them, a bot will.  So it is stupid to revert my edits.  If there is some sort of forum where you can ask people who know more about orphans, I suggest posting it there.  [[User:Postcard Cathy|Postcard Cathy]] ([[User talk:Postcard Cathy|talk]]) 21:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

17181 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-16 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.245212400E09 +++$+++ That's the strange thing - bots simply don't tag these pages as orphans. What's more, I just tried AWB on the pages - it's very good at checking out orphans and adding the orphan tag - but it doesn't tag these pages. I've created hundreds of <nowiki>{{surname}}<\/nowiki> pages, and you're the only editor as far as I can remember who has ever put an orphan tag on them. --  +++$+++ That's the strange thing - bots simply don't tag these pages as orphans. What's more, I just tried AWB on the pages - it's very good at checking out orphans and adding the orphan tag - but it doesn't tag these pages. I've created hundreds of <nowiki>{{surname}}</nowiki> pages, and you're the only editor as far as I can remember who has ever put an orphan tag on them. -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides|talk]]) 21:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
17182 +++$+++ Postcard Cathy +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17181 +++$+++ 17181 +++$+++ 2009-06-16 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.245212700E09 +++$+++ You are talking to the wrong person.  I really don't know what to tell you.  I just know there is a bot that categorizes them as orphaned articles needing orphan tags.  Go to http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Orphan#Suggestions_for_how_to_de-orphan_an_article  Both Lonelypages and Untagged Orphans are finding them and putting them on their lists.  Please discuss it with them.  All I know is that they are showing up as meeting the criteria for orphan tags.  And as I said in my orphan summaries, as long as they show up there, I will tag them as orphans.  How to NOT get them listed as needing a tag is something I know nothing about. +++$+++ :You are talking to the wrong person.  I really don't know what to tell you.  I just know there is a bot that categorizes them as orphaned articles needing orphan tags.  Go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan#Suggestions_for_how_to_de-orphan_an_article  Both Lonelypages and Untagged Orphans are finding them and putting them on their lists.  Please discuss it with them.  All I know is that they are showing up as meeting the criteria for orphan tags.  And as I said in my orphan summaries, as long as they show up there, I will tag them as orphans.  How to NOT get them listed as needing a tag is something I know nothing about.[[User:Postcard Cathy|Postcard Cathy]] ([[User talk:Postcard Cathy|talk]]) 21:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

17183 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-16 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.245214260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your link to http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Orphan#Suggestions_for_how_to_de-orphan_an_article, which I've checked out. I then read the talk page for that article, and found that it clearly states that adding orphan tags to surname pages is pointless. Please see [[Wikipedia_talk:Orphan#Surname_pages]], which then links to a further discussion. In view of this, would you like to remove those orphan tags you inserted, or would you like me to do it? Sorry about this - it's always a bit discouraging when you find that some work you've done has to be undone - but hey that's life! Btw I had a look at your \"user contributions\" and you do soooo much brilliant hard work for WP - you put me to shame! Cheers (and admiration) --  +++$+++ Thanks for your link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan#Suggestions_for_how_to_de-orphan_an_article, which I've checked out. I then read the talk page for that article, and found that it clearly states that adding orphan tags to surname pages is pointless. Please see [[Wikipedia_talk:Orphan#Surname_pages]], which then links to a further discussion. In view of this, would you like to remove those orphan tags you inserted, or would you like me to do it? Sorry about this - it's always a bit discouraging when you find that some work you've done has to be undone - but hey that's life! Btw I had a look at your "user contributions" and you do soooo much brilliant hard work for WP - you put me to shame! Cheers (and admiration) -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides|talk]]) 21:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
17184 +++$+++ Postcard Cathy +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17183 +++$+++ 17183 +++$+++ 2009-06-16 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.245214560E09 +++$+++ I don't meant to sound cranky or rude but I was so done with this a long time ago.  As long as they appear on the lists of articles to be tagged, I will tag them because as I understand it, if I don't then a bot will.  So do as you want.  The issue as I see it is how not to be listed by those tools.  Until the tools don't list them anymore, they will be tagged.  Please don't follow up with me again on this topic (but feel free to talk with  me on others! :P) since I feel I am repeating and repeating and repeating and repeating and repeating.....   +++$+++ :I don't meant to sound cranky or rude but I was so done with this a long time ago.  As long as they appear on the lists of articles to be tagged, I will tag them because as I understand it, if I don't then a bot will.  So do as you want.  The issue as I see it is how not to be listed by those tools.  Until the tools don't list them anymore, they will be tagged.  Please don't follow up with me again on this topic (but feel free to talk with  me on others! :P) since I feel I am repeating and repeating and repeating and repeating and repeating.....  [[User:Postcard Cathy|Postcard Cathy]] ([[User talk:Postcard Cathy|talk]]) 21:56, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

541472 +++$+++ Legaleagle86 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541472 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-08 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.163026260E09 +++$+++ Hello Ford, thanks for commenting on the R&AW discussion page. But i would like to point out that i was unable to find a single instance in the article which mentioned that the Indian Army unleashed a terror campaign, you have commented that the article is slanted towards pakistan, however the article has a very unflattering tone towards the western neighbour of India, the RAW success in Bangladesh pictures  a very grim pic of pak army. In the end i would like to know what exactly you meant by 'Spiffy', looking forward to your contribution in the article  +++$+++ Hello Ford, thanks for commenting on the R&AW discussion page. But i would like to point out that i was unable to find a single instance in the article which mentioned that the Indian Army unleashed a terror campaign, you have commented that the article is slanted towards pakistan, however the article has a very unflattering tone towards the western neighbour of India, the RAW success in Bangladesh pictures  a very grim pic of pak army. In the end i would like to know what exactly you meant by 'Spiffy', looking forward to your contribution in the article [[User:Legaleagle86|Legaleagle86]] 14:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
541473 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541472 +++$+++ 541472 +++$+++ 2006-11-08 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.163038320E09 +++$+++ Ah, I got my parties reversed, I admit, but the \"reign of terror\" is there, first sentence in the [[Research and Analysis Wing#Major successes of R&AW]] section, as are references to Kashmir being \"Pakistan occupied\",.  Again, there's not a ruinous amount of POV language; it could easily be cleaned up.   +++$+++ : Ah, I got my parties reversed, I admit, but the "reign of terror" is there, first sentence in the [[Research and Analysis Wing#Major successes of R&AW]] section, as are references to Kashmir being "Pakistan occupied",.  Again, there's not a ruinous amount of POV language; it could easily be cleaned up.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 18:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
541474 +++$+++ Legaleagle86 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541472 +++$+++ 541473 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 12:56:00 +++$+++ 1.163364960E09 +++$+++ Hi Ford, first i must congratulate you on the excellent cleanup. However i still feel little unsatisfied on the reasoning of fact over fiction on the media potryal v controversy debate. Morever dont you think that a brief mention of chanakya would have enhanced the image of ancient espionage in india. waiting for further cleanup, keep up the good work.  +++$+++ :: Hi Ford, first i must congratulate you on the excellent cleanup. However i still feel little unsatisfied on the reasoning of fact over fiction on the media potryal v controversy debate. Morever dont you think that a brief mention of chanakya would have enhanced the image of ancient espionage in india. waiting for further cleanup, keep up the good work. [[User:Legaleagle86|Legaleagle86]] 12:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

279329 +++$+++ Scimitar +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279329 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-07 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.128750300E09 +++$+++ I don't suppose you have a link to the ArbCom elections, do you? I'm having difficulty finding them.-- +++$+++ I don't suppose you have a link to the ArbCom elections, do you? I'm having difficulty finding them.--[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] [[User talk:Scimitar|<sup>parley</sup>]] 22:45, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
279330 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279329 +++$+++ 279329 +++$+++ 2005-10-07 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.128750840E09 +++$+++ Hi Scimitar. The election page is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2005|here]], the voting hasn't started yet. Candidate statements are [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2005\/Candidate statements|here]]. There ''was'' an endoresements page [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2005\/Candidate statements\/Endorsements|here]]. But now it's \"closed\".  +++$+++ : Hi Scimitar. The election page is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2005|here]], the voting hasn't started yet. Candidate statements are [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2005/Candidate statements|here]]. There ''was'' an endoresements page [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2005/Candidate statements/Endorsements|here]]. But now it's "closed". [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:54, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
279331 +++$+++ Scimitar +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279329 +++$+++ 279330 +++$+++ 2005-10-07 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.128751320E09 +++$+++ Thank you.-- +++$+++ ::Thank you.--[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] [[User talk:Scimitar|<sup>parley</sup>]] 23:02, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

17186 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-16 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.245216360E09 +++$+++ Cathy, the same applies to <nowiki>{{given name}}<\/nowiki> pages such as [[Chrissie]]. A moment's reflection shows that adding orphan tags to such pages is pointless. I suggest you ask for the toolserver script to be amended so that it doesn't flag surname and given name pages, since they are just variants of dab pages. Good luck --  +++$+++ Cathy, the same applies to <nowiki>{{given name}}</nowiki> pages such as [[Chrissie]]. A moment's reflection shows that adding orphan tags to such pages is pointless. I suggest you ask for the toolserver script to be amended so that it doesn't flag surname and given name pages, since they are just variants of dab pages. Good luck -- [[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001|talk]]) 22:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
17187 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17186 +++$+++ 17186 +++$+++ 2009-06-16 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.245216660E09 +++$+++ It isn't an issue for me but it seems to be an issue for you, Hebrides and others. I threw out talking to the toolserver editor for those of you that have an issue with it. It is a Mexican standoff. The rules say if it is on that list, it should be tagged. I am going to tag it. If you feel it shouldn't be tag, do what you feel you should do to make sure it doesn't end up on the list of articles to be tagged. Now, this really is my final time discussing this topic. I have repeated myself too many times. If you and anyone else don't want names to be tagged as orphans, do what YOU feel you need to do to make sure it doesn't end up on a list of articles to be tagged. Postcard Cathy (talk) 22:31, 16 June 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ :It isn't an issue for me but it seems to be an issue for you, Hebrides and others. I threw out talking to the toolserver editor for those of you that have an issue with it. It is a Mexican standoff. The rules say if it is on that list, it should be tagged. I am going to tag it. If you feel it shouldn't be tag, do what you feel you should do to make sure it doesn't end up on the list of articles to be tagged. Now, this really is my final time discussing this topic. I have repeated myself too many times. If you and anyone else don't want names to be tagged as orphans, do what YOU feel you need to do to make sure it doesn't end up on a list of articles to be tagged. Postcard Cathy (talk) 22:31, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
17188 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17186 +++$+++ 17187 +++$+++ 2009-06-16 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.245217560E09 +++$+++ Cathy, you say you're a member of [[Mensa]] on your user page, so this surely shouldn't be difficult for you to see. Surely I don't need to explain the obvious to you? The [[Chrissie]] article has been around for 8 months, and no bot has attempted to tag it in that period (not surprising, of course). The correct course of action is to suggest to the author of the toolserver script that he\/she change it to exclude surname and given name pages (they can easily be identified by their categories). Please don't waste the time of other editors by making pointless changes. Thanks, and good luck again. -- +++$+++ ::Cathy, you say you're a member of [[Mensa]] on your user page, so this surely shouldn't be difficult for you to see. Surely I don't need to explain the obvious to you? The [[Chrissie]] article has been around for 8 months, and no bot has attempted to tag it in that period (not surprising, of course). The correct course of action is to suggest to the author of the toolserver script that he/she change it to exclude surname and given name pages (they can easily be identified by their categories). Please don't waste the time of other editors by making pointless changes. Thanks, and good luck again. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001|talk]]) 22:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

279332 +++$+++ Ceejayoz +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-09 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.128851280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for getting that so fast. I saw it, got ready to AfD it, and it was already gone! :-D \u2014  +++$+++ Thanks for getting that so fast. I saw it, got ready to AfD it, and it was already gone! :-D — [[User:Ceejayoz|ceejayoz]] <sup><font color="darkred">[[User_talk:Ceejayoz|&#9733;]]</font></sup> 02:48, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
279333 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279332 +++$+++ 279332 +++$+++ 2005-10-09 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.128851340E09 +++$+++ You're welcome.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:49, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

17189 +++$+++ Fabrictramp +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17189 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-20 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.245537480E09 +++$+++ I'm a bit confused as to why you removed the {{tl|deadend}} tag from [[American Esperantist]] in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=American_Esperantist&diff=297506707&oldid=296570248 this edit]. You didn't introduce any blue links into the article, so it's still a deadend article. Care to enlighten me?-- +++$+++ I'm a bit confused as to why you removed the {{tl|deadend}} tag from [[American Esperantist]] in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_Esperantist&diff=297506707&oldid=296570248 this edit]. You didn't introduce any blue links into the article, so it's still a deadend article. Care to enlighten me?--[[User:Fabrictramp|<font color="#228b22" face="comic sans ms">Fabrictramp</font>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="Papyrus">talk to me</font>]] 15:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
17190 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17189 +++$+++ 17189 +++$+++ 2009-06-20 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.245556320E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for spotting that. How strange. My fault. I was using AWB to step through a few hundred pages this morning; and I find AWB is usually very good at adding tags (for orphans, uncategorised, wikify, etc) when needed, and occasionally removing tags that are no longer needed. Obviously I didn't look carefully enough at its suggestion on this page, and I'm not sure why it suggested removing the deadend tag when adding an orphan tag. I must watch carefully for that in future, and make sure I check whether the link(s) on the page are redlinks (it's displayed in edit mode, so there's no visual clue when a link is red). I've repaired it, so it now has both a deadend and orphan tag. Sorry about that  --  +++$+++ :Hi, thanks for spotting that. How strange. My fault. I was using AWB to step through a few hundred pages this morning; and I find AWB is usually very good at adding tags (for orphans, uncategorised, wikify, etc) when needed, and occasionally removing tags that are no longer needed. Obviously I didn't look carefully enough at its suggestion on this page, and I'm not sure why it suggested removing the deadend tag when adding an orphan tag. I must watch carefully for that in future, and make sure I check whether the link(s) on the page are redlinks (it's displayed in edit mode, so there's no visual clue when a link is red). I've repaired it, so it now has both a deadend and orphan tag. Sorry about that  -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
17191 +++$+++ Fabrictramp +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17189 +++$+++ 17190 +++$+++ 2009-06-20 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.245562080E09 +++$+++ No problem -- I just wanted to check that ''I'' hadn't lost my marbles. :) -- +++$+++ ::No problem -- I just wanted to check that ''I'' hadn't lost my marbles. :) --[[User:Fabrictramp|<font color="#228b22" face="comic sans ms">Fabrictramp</font>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="Papyrus">talk to me</font>]] 22:28, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

279334 +++$+++ Cryptic +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-09 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.128871500E09 +++$+++ Hi.  You closed [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion\/Smokabong|this vfd]] as delete, but don't seem to have pushed the button on [[Smokabong|the article]] itself. &mdash; +++$+++ Hi.  You closed [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Smokabong|this vfd]] as delete, but don't seem to have pushed the button on [[Smokabong|the article]] itself. &mdash;[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] [[User talk:Cryptic|(talk)]] 08:25, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
279335 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279334 +++$+++ 279334 +++$+++ 2005-10-09 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.128892440E09 +++$+++ Ooops! Thanks Cryptic, for catching my mistake. As you can see, the button has now been pushed ;-) &mdash;  +++$+++ :Ooops! Thanks Cryptic, for catching my mistake. As you can see, the button has now been pushed ;-) &mdash; [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:14, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

527153 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527153 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-04 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.228396620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the \"fun fact\" and the ref. majic in my workshop. That Capt. Castro is something else isn't he? I got in touch with Brig. Gen. [[Hector E. Pagan]] Deputy commander of the Special Forces (He is the one who presented me with the excellence medal in Puerto Rico) and he has arranged my contact with Castro. I'll do it after I organize my research.  +++$+++ Thanks for the "fun fact" and the ref. majic in my workshop. That Capt. Castro is something else isn't he? I got in touch with Brig. Gen. [[Hector E. Pagan]] Deputy commander of the Special Forces (He is the one who presented me with the excellence medal in Puerto Rico) and he has arranged my contact with Castro. I'll do it after I organize my research. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 05:17, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
527154 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527153 +++$+++ 527153 +++$+++ 2008-12-05 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.228528080E09 +++$+++ Please, take a look at my workshop and tell me is the article is running smoothly. Semper Fi,  +++$+++ *Please, take a look at my workshop and tell me is the article is running smoothly. Semper Fi, [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 17:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
527155 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527153 +++$+++ 527153 +++$+++ 2008-12-05 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.228508100E09 +++$+++ Rearranging abit would be fine, but I've tried to take into account what article and image are being featured each month, and make them relate or at least complement. I'm going to have to insist that [[Portal:United States Marine Corps\/picture\/2009September]] stay on that month (and I'm sure you'll probably agree why), and I wanted [[Portal:United States Marine Corps\/article\/2009May|the M777]] to be featured in May because it was first fielded May 2005, but the rest is open to your meddling, my friend. ''' +++$+++ :Rearranging abit would be fine, but I've tried to take into account what article and image are being featured each month, and make them relate or at least complement. I'm going to have to insist that [[Portal:United States Marine Corps/picture/2009September]] stay on that month (and I'm sure you'll probably agree why), and I wanted [[Portal:United States Marine Corps/article/2009May|the M777]] to be featured in May because it was first fielded May 2005, but the rest is open to your meddling, my friend. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#006400;color:#fff;">bahamut0013</span>]][[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♠</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#00FF00;color:#000">♣</span>]]'''  12:15, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

17192 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-22 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.245699840E09 +++$+++ Unprotected at your request. -- +++$+++ Unprotected at your request. --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  &#x007C;  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 12:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
17193 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17192 +++$+++ 17192 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.245701640E09 +++$+++ I just tried to create it. It's still protected, and won't let me create...  +++$+++ :I just tried to create it. It's still protected, and won't let me create... [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 13:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
17194 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17192 +++$+++ 17193 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.245701940E09 +++$+++ Try it again; haven't done one of these in a while. -- +++$+++ ::Try it again; haven't done one of these in a while. --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  &#x007C;  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 13:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
17195 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17192 +++$+++ 17194 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.245704040E09 +++$+++ Yes it worked this time. Thanks.  +++$+++ :::Yes it worked this time. Thanks. [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 13:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

279337 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-11 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.129049880E09 +++$+++ 2) The second problem, far bigger, concerns the article [[Diadochi]] :-( I've let myself be trapped in taking part in a revert war with [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] :-( The problem is that Puskin doesn't seem a very reasonable wikipedian, and so I doubt I can engineer a compromise :-( What shall I do?  +++$+++ 2) The second problem, far bigger, concerns the article [[Diadochi]] :-( I've let myself be trapped in taking part in a revert war with [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] :-( The problem is that Puskin doesn't seem a very reasonable wikipedian, and so I doubt I can engineer a compromise :-( What shall I do? [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 09:58, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
279338 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279337 +++$+++ 279337 +++$+++ 2005-10-11 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.129080180E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux. I have removed the content that was added to [[Olympias]], [[Cassander]] and [[Hephaestion]]. It didn't seem particularly relevant to me. If it gets added back, we should discuss it on the article's talk pages. I have also reverted Miskin's edits to [[Diadochi]], and posted a comment on [[Talk:Diadochi]], please join in the discussion there if you like. Unfortunately \"revert wars\" are a part of the Wikipedian landscape. It is best to try and avoid them. I would suggest trying to use the talkpages as much as possible. Some more general suggestions (not that I think you need them ;-), would be: Try to keep an open mind. Realize that many disagreements are the result miscommunication. Try not to take disagreements personally. Be considered in what you write. And above all remain polite. Getting other editors involved (like you did here) can also be a good thing to do. Read [[Wikipedia:WikiLove]]. That is the best advice (or platitudes) I have to offer at the moment, if I think of anything else that might help I will let you know ;-)  +++$+++ :Hi Aldux. I have removed the content that was added to [[Olympias]], [[Cassander]] and [[Hephaestion]]. It didn't seem particularly relevant to me. If it gets added back, we should discuss it on the article's talk pages. I have also reverted Miskin's edits to [[Diadochi]], and posted a comment on [[Talk:Diadochi]], please join in the discussion there if you like. Unfortunately "revert wars" are a part of the Wikipedian landscape. It is best to try and avoid them. I would suggest trying to use the talkpages as much as possible. Some more general suggestions (not that I think you need them ;-), would be: Try to keep an open mind. Realize that many disagreements are the result miscommunication. Try not to take disagreements personally. Be considered in what you write. And above all remain polite. Getting other editors involved (like you did here) can also be a good thing to do. Read [[Wikipedia:WikiLove]]. That is the best advice (or platitudes) I have to offer at the moment, if I think of anything else that might help I will let you know ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:23, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
279339 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279337 +++$+++ 279338 +++$+++ 2005-10-11 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.129084320E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot Paul :-) I promise I'll try to be more considerate and less harsh next time I find myself in disagreement with another wikipedian  +++$+++ ::Thanks a lot Paul :-) I promise I'll try to be more considerate and less harsh next time I find myself in disagreement with another wikipedian [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 19:32, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
279340 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279337 +++$+++ 279338 +++$+++ 2005-10-11 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.129088220E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. I hope you didn't think that anything I wrote above was any sort or criticism of you, because it wasn't. I don't think you committed any \"sins\",  [[mortal sin|mortal]] ''or'' [[venial sin|venial]]. If I had, I would have given you some more penance ;-) ''vade in pace''.   +++$+++ ::You are very welcome. I hope you didn't think that anything I wrote above was any sort or criticism of you, because it wasn't. I don't think you committed any "sins",  [[mortal sin|mortal]] ''or'' [[venial sin|venial]]. If I had, I would have given you some more penance ;-) ''vade in pace''.  [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:37, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

541483 +++$+++ Patrick987 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-27 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.167242880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the last edit, it sounds much better now. Can you please correct the other articles you added that questionable amnesty report to? That report is unverified and unconfirmed, it would very well be an opposition hoax originating from [[MKO]], which is why the amnesty report itself uses language like \"may have taken place\" or \" allegedly\". In other words, no independent news agency has reported or confirmed it. -- +++$+++ Thanks for the last edit, it sounds much better now. Can you please correct the other articles you added that questionable amnesty report to? That report is unverified and unconfirmed, it would very well be an opposition hoax originating from [[MKO]], which is why the amnesty report itself uses language like "may have taken place" or " allegedly". In other words, no independent news agency has reported or confirmed it. --[[User:Patrick987|Patrick987]] 10:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
541484 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541483 +++$+++ 541483 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 10:12:00 +++$+++ 1.167243120E09 +++$+++ I'm pretty sure others have taken care of that for me.  I only rv'ed the Shahroudi article because I thought it was important to mention that he was the guy who placed the moratorium on stoning, which has really been his only source of media coverage in the west.   +++$+++ :I'm pretty sure others have taken care of that for me.  I only rv'ed the Shahroudi article because I thought it was important to mention that he was the guy who placed the moratorium on stoning, which has really been his only source of media coverage in the west.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 10:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
541485 +++$+++ Patrick987 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541483 +++$+++ 541484 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.167243660E09 +++$+++ Actually, that questionable report is still on [[Human rights in Iran]] and [[Criminal code of Iran]] where you added it. I'd appreciate it if you corrected those articles yourself, since you're the original contributor.  -- +++$+++ :: Actually, that questionable report is still on [[Human rights in Iran]] and [[Criminal code of Iran]] where you added it. I'd appreciate it if you corrected those articles yourself, since you're the original contributor.  --[[User:Patrick987|Patrick987]] 10:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
541486 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541483 +++$+++ 541485 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 10:28:00 +++$+++ 1.167244080E09 +++$+++ Er ... in both cases, my contributions have already been rv'ed.  See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Iranian_Criminal_Code&diff=96682443&oldid=96600846 Iranian criminal code] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Human_rights_in_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran&diff=96681642&oldid=96602339 Human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran].   +++$+++ :::Er ... in both cases, my contributions have already been rv'ed.  See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iranian_Criminal_Code&diff=96682443&oldid=96600846 Iranian criminal code] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Human_rights_in_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran&diff=96681642&oldid=96602339 Human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran].  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 10:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
541487 +++$+++ Patrick987 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541483 +++$+++ 541486 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.167245160E09 +++$+++ Er...I can still see it on [[Human rights in Iran]], someone must have re-rv'ed somewhere. I don't wanna revert it myself, because in such cases, it's best that the contributing editor corrects the paragraph or the info, to avoid any misunderstanding or a potential edit-war. -- +++$+++ :::: Er...I can still see it on [[Human rights in Iran]], someone must have re-rv'ed somewhere. I don't wanna revert it myself, because in such cases, it's best that the contributing editor corrects the paragraph or the info, to avoid any misunderstanding or a potential edit-war. --[[User:Patrick987|Patrick987]] 10:46, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

17196 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-23 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.245812580E09 +++$+++ I gave the article a bit of expansion and some sourcing. If the nominator had followed even the least of [[WP:BEFORE]], it would have never been tossed into AfD. If the intention was to force improvement, he misused the process. ''' +++$+++ I gave the article a bit of expansion and some sourcing. If the nominator had followed even the least of [[WP:BEFORE]], it would have never been tossed into AfD. If the intention was to force improvement, he misused the process. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 20:03, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
17197 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17196 +++$+++ 17196 +++$+++ 2009-06-24 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.245849540E09 +++$+++ She's been saved. Improvements impressed the speedy closer. Nomination was by a banned user. ''' +++$+++ :She's been saved. Improvements impressed the speedy closer. Nomination was by a banned user. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 06:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

279341 +++$+++ Kiand +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-11 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.129074960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for doing some of the disambig work on [[Lucan]] - I went through the ones for the town, and ended up edit crashing with you on the poet ones at least twice :) -- +++$+++ Thanks for doing some of the disambig work on [[Lucan]] - I went through the ones for the town, and ended up edit crashing with you on the poet ones at least twice :) --[[User:Kiand|Kiand]] 16:56, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
279342 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279341 +++$+++ 279341 +++$+++ 2005-10-11 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.129075140E09 +++$+++ Your welcome, and I'm sorry ;-)  +++$+++ :Your welcome, and I'm sorry ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:59, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

17198 +++$+++ Fox1942 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-25 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.245958680E09 +++$+++ Please consider (Orphan): There are two external links, in particular referring to two books, and I think this is might be enough of my contribution to the article Ausbuy. Greetings,-- +++$+++ Please consider (Orphan): There are two external links, in particular referring to two books, and I think this is might be enough of my contribution to the article Ausbuy. Greetings,--[[User:Fox1942|Fox1942]] ([[User talk:Fox1942|talk]]) 12:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
17199 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17198 +++$+++ 17198 +++$+++ 2009-06-25 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.245965820E09 +++$+++ Hope that helps. --  +++$+++ :Hope that helps. -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 14:37, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
17200 +++$+++ Fox1942 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17198 +++$+++ 17199 +++$+++ 2009-06-25 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.245968760E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for your kind help. Within the next few weeks I will try to improve the article in the sense you have adviced me. Greetings, -- +++$+++ ::Thank you very much for your kind help. Within the next few weeks I will try to improve the article in the sense you have adviced me. Greetings, --[[User:Fox1942|Fox1942]] ([[User talk:Fox1942|talk]]) 15:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
17201 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17198 +++$+++ 17200 +++$+++ 2009-06-25 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.245968940E09 +++$+++ Good to have you on board :)  +++$+++ :::Good to have you on board :) [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 15:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
17202 +++$+++ Fox1942 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17198 +++$+++ 17201 +++$+++ 2009-06-27 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.246150560E09 +++$+++ I appreciate very much your kind help to improve the article - I learnt a lot to write much more better articles in future in en.Wikipedia! Best Greetings from the Australian Tropics at the South Pacific.-- +++$+++ ::::I appreciate very much your kind help to improve the article - I learnt a lot to write much more better articles in future in en.Wikipedia! Best Greetings from the Australian Tropics at the South Pacific.--[[User:Fox1942|Fox1942]] ([[User talk:Fox1942|talk]]) 17:56, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
17203 +++$+++ Fox1942 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17198 +++$+++ 17202 +++$+++ 2009-07-08 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.247081520E09 +++$+++ I have implemented some aspects of moral suasion.-- +++$+++ :::::I have implemented some aspects of moral suasion.--[[User:Fox1942|Fox1942]] ([[User talk:Fox1942|talk]]) 12:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

279343 +++$+++ Csernica +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-13 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.129204620E09 +++$+++ You may want to pay closer attention to your reversions.  The recent one you made to the [[Pope]] article \"corrected\" the deletion of [http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/d\/d0\/Palpa.jpg this image] as the picture of the incumbent.  I'm ''almost'' positive this was an accident. (It's well known that [[Pope Benedict XVI]] resembles Emperor [[Palpatine]], but it's hardly encyclopedic to point that up.) '' +++$+++ You may want to pay closer attention to your reversions.  The recent one you made to the [[Pope]] article "corrected" the deletion of [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d0/Palpa.jpg this image] as the picture of the incumbent.  I'm ''almost'' positive this was an accident. (It's well known that [[Pope Benedict XVI]] resembles Emperor [[Palpatine]], but it's hardly encyclopedic to point that up.) ''[[User:Csernica|TCC]]'' <small>[[User_talk:Csernica|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Csernica|(contribs)]]</small> 04:57, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
279344 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279343 +++$+++ 279343 +++$+++ 2005-10-13 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.129205700E09 +++$+++ Oops! Sorry about that. Sometimes my vandalism trigger finger, gets a little twitchy. I will try to be more careful.  +++$+++ :Oops! Sorry about that. Sometimes my vandalism trigger finger, gets a little twitchy. I will try to be more careful. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:15, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

279345 +++$+++ Mindspillage +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279345 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-13 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.129254000E09 +++$+++ Of course you can, given that you already have. :-) Thanks; I'll do my best to be fair and effective. And not jump out a window in the process...  +++$+++ Of course you can, given that you already have. :-) Thanks; I'll do my best to be fair and effective. And not jump out a window in the process... [[User:Mindspillage|Mindspillage]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill yours?)]] 18:40, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
279346 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279345 +++$+++ 279345 +++$+++ 2005-10-13 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.129254660E09 +++$+++ Yes, ''especially'' the part about not jumping out a window!  +++$+++ :Yes, ''especially'' the part about not jumping out a window! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:51, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

17204 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17204 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-08 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.247106360E09 +++$+++ You also deleted the orphan tag!? Articles are orphans if they don't have other articles linking to them \u2013 strictly it remains an orphan until it has three articles linking to it (and that doesn't include list pages, disambiguation pages, user pages, etc). If you view the [[Ausbuy]] page and then click \"What links here\" on the left, you'll see that it is still technically an orphan, so you ought to put the tag back. It needs some links to it from other pages, but I don't think any other WP articles refer to Ausbuy yet. --  +++$+++ You also deleted the orphan tag!? Articles are orphans if they don't have other articles linking to them – strictly it remains an orphan until it has three articles linking to it (and that doesn't include list pages, disambiguation pages, user pages, etc). If you view the [[Ausbuy]] page and then click "What links here" on the left, you'll see that it is still technically an orphan, so you ought to put the tag back. It needs some links to it from other pages, but I don't think any other WP articles refer to Ausbuy yet. -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 19:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
17205 +++$+++ Fox1942 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17204 +++$+++ 17204 +++$+++ 2009-07-08 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.247121960E09 +++$+++ Well, sorry to delete the orphan tag, but then you might put the orphan tag back - I simply give up, because most likely this article hardly will meet the technical criteria of deleting an orphan tag. So it be. If you do not think this article is worth to be in Wikipedia, then we should consider to cancel it? Nevertheless I thank you for your kind help to \"fix\" this article. Best greetings from Australia, -- +++$+++ :Well, sorry to delete the orphan tag, but then you might put the orphan tag back - I simply give up, because most likely this article hardly will meet the technical criteria of deleting an orphan tag. So it be. If you do not think this article is worth to be in Wikipedia, then we should consider to cancel it? Nevertheless I thank you for your kind help to "fix" this article. Best greetings from Australia, --[[User:Fox1942|Fox1942]] ([[User talk:Fox1942|talk]]) 23:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
17206 +++$+++ Fox1942 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17204 +++$+++ 17204 +++$+++ 2009-07-08 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.247122620E09 +++$+++ I have put the orphan tag back. -- +++$+++ :I have put the orphan tag back. --[[User:Fox1942|Fox1942]] ([[User talk:Fox1942|talk]]) 23:57, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
17207 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17204 +++$+++ 17206 +++$+++ 2009-07-09 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.247143260E09 +++$+++ I think we may be confusing two things here: whether an article should exist; and whether an article has room for improvement. Tags like {{t1|orphan}}, {{t1|wikify}}, {{t1|Primarysources}}, {{t1|Unreferenced}}, etc., are part of the normal development of an article. What happens is that these tags not only give a message on screen when you view the article, but also add the article to a list of articles that need a certain type of improvement. There are communities of wikipedia editors who specialise in certain types of editing. See, for example, the [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Orphanage]] \u2013 and the long list of dedicated \"de-orphaners\" further down the page. Also, readers of an article who may know it is related to other subject areas may see the orphan tag and it might prompt them to spend a few minutes creating links to the article from other articles they know. It's all part of the power of collaborative authoring\u2026 --  +++$+++ ::I think we may be confusing two things here: whether an article should exist; and whether an article has room for improvement. Tags like {{t1|orphan}}, {{t1|wikify}}, {{t1|Primarysources}}, {{t1|Unreferenced}}, etc., are part of the normal development of an article. What happens is that these tags not only give a message on screen when you view the article, but also add the article to a list of articles that need a certain type of improvement. There are communities of wikipedia editors who specialise in certain types of editing. See, for example, the [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Orphanage]] – and the long list of dedicated "de-orphaners" further down the page. Also, readers of an article who may know it is related to other subject areas may see the orphan tag and it might prompt them to spend a few minutes creating links to the article from other articles they know. It's all part of the power of collaborative authoring… -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 05:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
17208 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17204 +++$+++ 17206 +++$+++ 2009-07-09 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.247145840E09 +++$+++ It just occurred to me that you may be thinking that the message \"''This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from other articles related to it.''\" is addressed to ''you'' in particular. It's not. It's actually a message to everybody. I sometimes tag articles I've worked on, as a way of inviting other people to do the bits I haven't managed to do. Hope that might help. --  +++$+++ ::It just occurred to me that you may be thinking that the message "''This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from other articles related to it.''" is addressed to ''you'' in particular. It's not. It's actually a message to everybody. I sometimes tag articles I've worked on, as a way of inviting other people to do the bits I haven't managed to do. Hope that might help. -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 06:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
17209 +++$+++ Fox1942 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17204 +++$+++ 17208 +++$+++ 2009-07-09 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.247178240E09 +++$+++ Now I understand much more the intention of an Orphan Tag. I appreciate very much your kind help and clarification! -- +++$+++ :::Now I understand much more the intention of an Orphan Tag. I appreciate very much your kind help and clarification! --[[User:Fox1942|Fox1942]] ([[User talk:Fox1942|talk]]) 15:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
17210 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17204 +++$+++ 17204 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.246934940E09 +++$+++ Based on that, I wouldn't regard either of these articles as a stub. What do you think? --  +++$+++ :Based on that, I wouldn't regard either of these articles as a stub. What do you think? -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 19:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

46558 +++$+++ Notafish +++$+++ Uucp +++$+++ 46558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-17 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.155875580E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMindspillage&diff=70303709&oldid=69695032 here]. Hugs too.  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMindspillage&diff=70303709&oldid=69695032 here]. Hugs too. [[User:Notafish|notafish]] [[User talk:Notafish| }&lt;&#39;;&gt;]] 21:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
46559 +++$+++ Mindspillage +++$+++ Uucp +++$+++ 46558 +++$+++ 46558 +++$+++ 2006-08-17 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.155877080E09 +++$+++ Greetings! I don't know what you need an admin for, but I'll do what I can. :-)  +++$+++ :Greetings! I don't know what you need an admin for, but I'll do what I can. :-) [[User:Mindspillage|Mindspillage]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill yours?)]] 21:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

279351 +++$+++ Nihonjoe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-21 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.129892280E09 +++$+++ Looks like we were stepping on each others toes a wee bit when reverting the vandalism just now by [[Special:Contributions\/24.171.57.110|24.171.57.110]]. Sorry about that. :p -- +++$+++ Looks like we were stepping on each others toes a wee bit when reverting the vandalism just now by [[Special:Contributions/24.171.57.110|24.171.57.110]]. Sorry about that. :p --[[User:Nihonjoe|nihon]] 03:58, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
279352 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279351 +++$+++ 279351 +++$+++ 2005-10-21 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.129892400E09 +++$+++ Not a problem. It was my fault really.  +++$+++ :Not a problem. It was my fault really. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:00, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
279353 +++$+++ Nihonjoe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279351 +++$+++ 279352 +++$+++ 2005-10-21 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.129892880E09 +++$+++ This is actually the first time it's happened like this for me. I did post a warning on the anon user's Talk page. Hopefully he'll stop. :) -- +++$+++ ::This is actually the first time it's happened like this for me. I did post a warning on the anon user's Talk page. Hopefully he'll stop. :) --[[User:Nihonjoe|nihon]] 04:08, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

541497 +++$+++ Shadowbot +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-07 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.168241760E09 +++$+++ Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered [[WP:SPAM|spamming]] and will be removed. Thanks.  +++$+++ Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered [[WP:SPAM|spamming]] and will be removed. Thanks. [[User:Shadowbot|Shadowbot]] 23:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
541498 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541497 +++$+++ 541497 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.168241820E09 +++$+++ Okay, okay, I get it!  I didn't read your first message before adding the second link.   +++$+++ :Okay, okay, I get it!  I didn't read your first message before adding the second link.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 23:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

17211 +++$+++ Anypodetos +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-12 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.247415600E09 +++$+++ Hi Hebrides! Please do not unlink section headers in ATC code lists like [[ATCvet code QI05]]. This is the only convenient place in these lists to link to related articles. Thanks -- +++$+++ Hi Hebrides! Please do not unlink section headers in ATC code lists like [[ATCvet code QI05]]. This is the only convenient place in these lists to link to related articles. Thanks --[[User:Anypodetos|ἀνυπόδητος]] ([[User talk:Anypodetos|talk]]) 09:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
17212 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17211 +++$+++ 17211 +++$+++ 2009-07-12 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.247457720E09 +++$+++ Sorry &ndash; I was following [[MOS:HEAD]]. Where are exceptions documented? --  +++$+++ :Sorry &ndash; I was following [[MOS:HEAD]]. Where are exceptions documented? -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 21:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
17213 +++$+++ Peteforsyth +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17211 +++$+++ 17212 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.247468700E09 +++$+++ Hebrides, I think you're right -- the article in question looks to me to be pretty far off MOS. I'd suggest replacing the header link with a {{tl|seealso}} template immediately below the header. - +++$+++ :: Hebrides, I think you're right -- the article in question looks to me to be pretty far off MOS. I'd suggest replacing the header link with a {{tl|seealso}} template immediately below the header. -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 00:05, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
17214 +++$+++ Anypodetos +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17211 +++$+++ 17212 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.247494020E09 +++$+++ I don't think this isn't documented anywhere, I was just following the practice of pages like [[ATC code C01]]. I agree that this doesn't conform with MOS; but before moving the links to {{tl|seealso}}, I'd place the issue at [[WT:PHARM]]. There are about 100 pages like that, and we should keep things consistent. -- +++$+++ :: I don't think this isn't documented anywhere, I was just following the practice of pages like [[ATC code C01]]. I agree that this doesn't conform with MOS; but before moving the links to {{tl|seealso}}, I'd place the issue at [[WT:PHARM]]. There are about 100 pages like that, and we should keep things consistent. --[[User:Anypodetos|ἀνυπόδητος]] ([[User talk:Anypodetos|talk]]) 07:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

279356 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-16 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.132157400E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid I haven't touched the Dante list, but I'd like to get your feedback on [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Objectivist poets\/archive1]].  +++$+++ I'm afraid I haven't touched the Dante list, but I'd like to get your feedback on [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Objectivist poets/archive1]]. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|The kettle's on]] 08:10, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
279357 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279356 +++$+++ 279356 +++$+++ 2005-11-17 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.132270080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the improvements.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the improvements. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|The kettle's on]] 15:28, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
279358 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279356 +++$+++ 279357 +++$+++ 2005-11-17 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.132271100E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome, glad you think they are improvements. But whatever they are, they are really very small. But I guess you mean it's the thought that counts. I have a couple of other minor concerns which I haven't figured out what to do about yet.  +++$+++ ::You're very welcome, glad you think they are improvements. But whatever they are, they are really very small. But I guess you mean it's the thought that counts. I have a couple of other minor concerns which I haven't figured out what to do about yet. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:45, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
279359 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279356 +++$+++ 279358 +++$+++ 2005-11-18 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.132329960E09 +++$+++ As they say, the devil is in the detail. Like the Italian, by the way.  +++$+++ :::As they say, the devil is in the detail. Like the Italian, by the way. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|The kettle's on]] 08:06, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
279360 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279356 +++$+++ 279359 +++$+++ 2005-11-18 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.132354920E09 +++$+++ I dropped [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] a quick line, nothing so formal as an introduction. And yes, you're right. It is always better to be civil. The harder it is, the more important.  +++$+++ ::::I dropped [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] a quick line, nothing so formal as an introduction. And yes, you're right. It is always better to be civil. The harder it is, the more important. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|The kettle's on]] 15:02, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
279361 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279356 +++$+++ 279360 +++$+++ 2005-11-18 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.132355280E09 +++$+++ Thanks and yup. Another reason I'd like to see you rather than some others on the ArbCom.  +++$+++ :::::Thanks and yup. Another reason I'd like to see you rather than some others on the ArbCom. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:08, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

17215 +++$+++ Peteforsyth +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-13 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.247468700E09 +++$+++ Hebrides, thanks for all your automated edits -- but you may want to reconsider some of them. I haven't looked through them in detail, so maybe this is just a one-time issue -- but [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=R._S._Hamilton&diff=next&oldid=301753188 this edit] isn't really helpful, and if you're doing a lot like that, I'd say it's a bit counterproductive (cluttering edit histories with unneeded edits, setting a poor example for new users, etc.) There's no policy about whether category tags should go above or below stub tags; When you find an order you disagree with, the best thing to do is leave it as-is. - +++$+++ Hebrides, thanks for all your automated edits -- but you may want to reconsider some of them. I haven't looked through them in detail, so maybe this is just a one-time issue -- but [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=R._S._Hamilton&diff=next&oldid=301753188 this edit] isn't really helpful, and if you're doing a lot like that, I'd say it's a bit counterproductive (cluttering edit histories with unneeded edits, setting a poor example for new users, etc.) There's no policy about whether category tags should go above or below stub tags; When you find an order you disagree with, the best thing to do is leave it as-is. -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 00:05, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
17216 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17215 +++$+++ 17215 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 07:41:00 +++$+++ 1.247496060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for getting in touch. --  +++$+++ :Thanks for getting in touch. -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 07:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
17217 +++$+++ Peteforsyth +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17215 +++$+++ 17216 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.247532780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the thoughtful reply. I really don't think the occasional edit like the one mentioned above is a big deal, just thought I'd point it out in case you were on some campaign to do thousands of 'em :) As for DEFAULTSORT, I can't really imagine where it would be helpful outside of proper names -- if AWB is smart enough to distinguish humans with Western-ish names, that seems like a useful feature. But as for what you're describing, I'm not sure what the purpose could possibly be...but, I'm not really an expert on that stuff, maybe there's something I'm unaware of? - +++$+++ :: Thanks for the thoughtful reply. I really don't think the occasional edit like the one mentioned above is a big deal, just thought I'd point it out in case you were on some campaign to do thousands of 'em :) As for DEFAULTSORT, I can't really imagine where it would be helpful outside of proper names -- if AWB is smart enough to distinguish humans with Western-ish names, that seems like a useful feature. But as for what you're describing, I'm not sure what the purpose could possibly be...but, I'm not really an expert on that stuff, maybe there's something I'm unaware of? -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 17:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

541505 +++$+++ H. Carver +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541505 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.171826400E09 +++$+++ A tag has been placed on [[:Category:Characters created by Grant Morrison]], putting it up as a Category for Discussion. This has been done because the category is effectively the same as a category that has previously been deleted. If you believe that the category is different and shouldn't be deleted then you can vote at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion\/Log\/2007 February 18#Category:Characters created by Grant Morrison|the CfD log entry]].   +++$+++ A tag has been placed on [[:Category:Characters created by Grant Morrison]], putting it up as a Category for Discussion. This has been done because the category is effectively the same as a category that has previously been deleted. If you believe that the category is different and shouldn't be deleted then you can vote at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 February 18#Category:Characters created by Grant Morrison|the CfD log entry]].  [[User:H. Carver|H. Carver]] 11:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
541506 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541505 +++$+++ 541505 +++$+++ 2007-02-19 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.171929240E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure I even understand what this comment means, but okay!   +++$+++ :I'm not sure I even understand what this comment means, but okay!  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 15:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
541507 +++$+++ Tazmaniacs +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541505 +++$+++ 541506 +++$+++ 2007-02-19 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.171951920E09 +++$+++ Hello, I just wanted to ask you, since you removed my invisible comment, if you could explain me what was an Italian \"political asylum passport\". Again, I know that you can be granted [[political asylum]], and that gives you a special [[VISA]], but a passport is another thing. Do you mean that the [[Imam Rapito]] had something like, not a diplomatic passport, but an \"asylum passport\"? Can you source that? Furthermore, I point out to you that the head of CIA in Rome was in charge of the CIA for Italy until 2003, and has been indicted. You've confused him with Lady, who was head of CIA in Milan. Finally, you removed the \"unsourced speculation\" concerning diplomatic problems between Italy & the States. Fair enough, there is no immediate source. But it's funny you put this in question, it's a general kind of comment which has been all over the press...  +++$+++ ::Hello, I just wanted to ask you, since you removed my invisible comment, if you could explain me what was an Italian "political asylum passport". Again, I know that you can be granted [[political asylum]], and that gives you a special [[VISA]], but a passport is another thing. Do you mean that the [[Imam Rapito]] had something like, not a diplomatic passport, but an "asylum passport"? Can you source that? Furthermore, I point out to you that the head of CIA in Rome was in charge of the CIA for Italy until 2003, and has been indicted. You've confused him with Lady, who was head of CIA in Milan. Finally, you removed the "unsourced speculation" concerning diplomatic problems between Italy & the States. Fair enough, there is no immediate source. But it's funny you put this in question, it's a general kind of comment which has been all over the press... [[User:Tazmaniacs|Tazmaniacs]] 22:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

279362 +++$+++ Mindspillage +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279362 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-18 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.132359180E09 +++$+++ Oh, another welcome back; good to see you around again!  +++$+++ Oh, another welcome back; good to see you around again! [[User:Mindspillage|Mindspillage]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill yours?)]] 16:13, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
279363 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279362 +++$+++ 279362 +++$+++ 2005-11-18 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.132360920E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I had a great time in Italy and it is good to be back. But \u2026 you ''see'' me?  Gosh, I better get dressed then! (To Fil: I don't mind ''you'' seeing me unwashed, disheveled and in my bathrobe, but Kat is another thing altogether &mdash; and fortunately so! She is another one who is also quite civil, which will stand her in good stead on ArbCom.)  +++$+++ :Thank you! I had a great time in Italy and it is good to be back. But … you ''see'' me?  Gosh, I better get dressed then! (To Fil: I don't mind ''you'' seeing me unwashed, disheveled and in my bathrobe, but Kat is another thing altogether &mdash; and fortunately so! She is another one who is also quite civil, which will stand her in good stead on ArbCom.) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:42, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
279364 +++$+++ Mindspillage +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279362 +++$+++ 279363 +++$+++ 2005-11-18 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.132374840E09 +++$+++ As for arbcom... well, I should just say that my tongue is raw from all the biting to keep up that civility, but thank you. I'd say I'd love to see Filiocht on it, too, but I'm torn, as I don't generally wish that sort of thing on people I like...   +++$+++ ::As for arbcom... well, I should just say that my tongue is raw from all the biting to keep up that civility, but thank you. I'd say I'd love to see Filiocht on it, too, but I'm torn, as I don't generally wish that sort of thing on people I like...  [[User:Mindspillage|Mindspillage]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill yours?)]] 20:34, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
279365 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279362 +++$+++ 279364 +++$+++ 2005-11-21 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.132589520E09 +++$+++ Kat sans hat; whatever next?  +++$+++ :::Kat sans hat; whatever next? [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|The kettle's on]] 08:12, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

483467 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.191878280E09 +++$+++ Before you offered to add frequently vandalized pages to your watchlist.  [[Ellen Ochoa]] has been repeatedly vandalized latly, so it would be a good idea to add it to your watchlist and check for vandalism.  Thank you.   +++$+++ Before you offered to add frequently vandalized pages to your watchlist.  [[Ellen Ochoa]] has been repeatedly vandalized latly, so it would be a good idea to add it to your watchlist and check for vandalism.  Thank you.  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 14:18, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
483468 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483467 +++$+++ 483467 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.191886560E09 +++$+++ Done.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Done.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 16:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
483469 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483467 +++$+++ 483468 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.191887220E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  For some reason, she seems to be a target of vandalism.   +++$+++ :: Thank you.  For some reason, she seems to be a target of vandalism.  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 16:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
483470 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483467 +++$+++ 483467 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.191896820E09 +++$+++ I have no idea what you're talking about but you tried to change the article to represent someone with no apparent notability.  \u2014 +++$+++ :I have no idea what you're talking about but you tried to change the article to represent someone with no apparent notability.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 19:27, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

541508 +++$+++ Fritz Saalfeld +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541508 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.172542380E09 +++$+++ I removed the cover gallery you added to [[Joshua Middleton]], because [[Wikipedia:Fair use criteria|Wikipedia's fair use criteria]] does not allow purely decorative use of copyrighted images. -- +++$+++ I removed the cover gallery you added to [[Joshua Middleton]], because [[Wikipedia:Fair use criteria|Wikipedia's fair use criteria]] does not allow purely decorative use of copyrighted images. --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz S.]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 18:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
541509 +++$+++ Fritz Saalfeld +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541508 +++$+++ 541508 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.172543100E09 +++$+++ They are decorative because there is no discussion of his art style in the article (see [[WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files|Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of [...] images]] #4). Also, per [[WP:FUC]] #3 \"[t]he amount of copyrighted work used should be as little as possible.\" -- +++$+++ :They are decorative because there is no discussion of his art style in the article (see [[WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files|Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of [...] images]] #4). Also, per [[WP:FUC]] #3 "[t]he amount of copyrighted work used should be as little as possible." --[[User:Fritz Saalfeld|Fritz S.]] ([[User talk:Fritz Saalfeld|Talk]]) 18:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

17223 +++$+++ Decora +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-25 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.248555780E09 +++$+++ I tried to clean up [[Averda]] a little bit. I was wondering if you wanted to take a look and see if it is OK to remove the 'dead end' tag and uncategorizzed tag &c. Thank you  +++$+++ I tried to clean up [[Averda]] a little bit. I was wondering if you wanted to take a look and see if it is OK to remove the 'dead end' tag and uncategorizzed tag &c. Thank you [[User:Decora|Decora]] ([[User talk:Decora|talk]]) 14:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
17224 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17223 +++$+++ 17223 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.248575760E09 +++$+++ You're right \u2013 you've done some good work on this article. I've removed the deadend and wikify tags (and added a couple of references) \u2013 but I left the orphan tag because there don't seem to be any articles that link to it. I also left the refimprove in view of the fact that {{t1|citation-needed}} still occurs three times. Cheers --  +++$+++ :You're right – you've done some good work on this article. I've removed the deadend and wikify tags (and added a couple of references) – but I left the orphan tag because there don't seem to be any articles that link to it. I also left the refimprove in view of the fact that {{t1|citation-needed}} still occurs three times. Cheers -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 19:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

17225 +++$+++ Bigweeboy +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17225 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-29 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.248922620E09 +++$+++ What issues do you have with this article?  It seems good to me.  -- +++$+++ What issues do you have with this article?  It seems good to me.  --[[User:Bigweeboy|BwB]] ([[User talk:Bigweeboy|talk]]) 19:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
17226 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17225 +++$+++ 17225 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.248925860E09 +++$+++ Hello BWB, and thanks for your message, which has left me slightly puzzled. I've done a couple of edits to [[Alexander Esters]]: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Alexander_Esters&diff=297503509&oldid=297019940 this one] on 20 June, which just standardised a few capital letters (\"Friday\", \"November\", etc); and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Alexander_Esters&diff=299636520&oldid=299408097 this one] on July 1, which did some minor tidying, capital letters (again!), and changed a few spaces to non-breaking spaces. I wasn't aware that either of these edits implied that I had \"issues\" with the article. In fact, the article seems to be coming on quite well. Please explain\u2026 --   +++$+++ :Hello BWB, and thanks for your message, which has left me slightly puzzled. I've done a couple of edits to [[Alexander Esters]]: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_Esters&diff=297503509&oldid=297019940 this one] on 20 June, which just standardised a few capital letters ("Friday", "November", etc); and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_Esters&diff=299636520&oldid=299408097 this one] on July 1, which did some minor tidying, capital letters (again!), and changed a few spaces to non-breaking spaces. I wasn't aware that either of these edits implied that I had "issues" with the article. In fact, the article seems to be coming on quite well. Please explain… --  [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

279370 +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-02 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.133510820E09 +++$+++ Furthermore, I'm wondering whether you're checking the email you have set, as I send a message to it. You can answer on Wikipedia, by email, or not at all, whatever you prefer. --  +++$+++ Furthermore, I'm wondering whether you're checking the email you have set, as I send a message to it. You can answer on Wikipedia, by email, or not at all, whatever you prefer. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] ([[User talk:Jitse Niesen|talk]]) 00:07, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
279371 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279370 +++$+++ 279370 +++$+++ 2005-12-02 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.133524500E09 +++$+++ And now it's 102, but they're all short! And would you rather I archived my page, or replied to your email? &mdash; I don't have time for both!  +++$+++ :And now it's 102, but they're all short! And would you rather I archived my page, or replied to your email? &mdash; I don't have time for both! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:55, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

541515 +++$+++ Qwerty_Binary +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-01 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.175431320E09 +++$+++ Anyway, do you exactly know what's going on with the page, because at the current, the page has been spell-fixed by myself, and I am astounded as I haven't a single clue about the page; what exactly does it amount to, and what is its purpose? Any help is appreciated. -- +++$+++ Anyway, do you exactly know what's going on with the page, because at the current, the page has been spell-fixed by myself, and I am astounded as I haven't a single clue about the page; what exactly does it amount to, and what is its purpose? Any help is appreciated. --[[User:Qwerty_Binary|Qwerty]] ([[User_talk:Qwerty_Binary|talk]]) 05:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
541516 +++$+++ Qwerty_Binary +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541515 +++$+++ 541515 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.175432100E09 +++$+++ Okey-dokey, Fordmadoxfraud. My bad. Thanks. :) -- +++$+++ :Okey-dokey, Fordmadoxfraud. My bad. Thanks. :) --[[User:Qwerty_Binary|Qwerty]] ([[User_talk:Qwerty_Binary|talk]]) 05:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
541517 +++$+++ Qwerty_Binary +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541515 +++$+++ 541516 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.175432280E09 +++$+++ {{cquote|3) ''Anyway, do you exactly know what's going on with the page, because at the current, the page has been spell-fixed by myself, and I am astounded as I haven't a single clue about the page; what exactly does it amount to, and what is its purpose?'' Er, wot? What's the purpose of any page on wikipedia, other than to be informative?}} Okay, my bad. -- +++$+++ ::{{cquote|3) ''Anyway, do you exactly know what's going on with the page, because at the current, the page has been spell-fixed by myself, and I am astounded as I haven't a single clue about the page; what exactly does it amount to, and what is its purpose?'' Er, wot? What's the purpose of any page on wikipedia, other than to be informative?}} Okay, my bad. --[[User:Qwerty_Binary|Qwerty]] ([[User_talk:Qwerty_Binary|talk]]) 05:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
541518 +++$+++ Qwerty_Binary +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541515 +++$+++ 541517 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.175432400E09 +++$+++ Nah, it's alright; you didn't come off a bit of a prick. Anyway, thanks for getting this resolved so quickly. Yep, uncited edits irritate me, too, and the anon editors can't spell... gah. -- +++$+++ :::Nah, it's alright; you didn't come off a bit of a prick. Anyway, thanks for getting this resolved so quickly. Yep, uncited edits irritate me, too, and the anon editors can't spell... gah. --[[User:Qwerty_Binary|Qwerty]] ([[User_talk:Qwerty_Binary|talk]]) 06:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

279372 +++$+++ Nihonjoe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279372 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-02 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.133514840E09 +++$+++ I'm curious whether you think [[Special:Contributions\/24.9.152.114|this user]] might be going a little overboard with promoting the [[Alleria]] page. I'm leaning that way, but want a second opinion. -- +++$+++ I'm curious whether you think [[Special:Contributions/24.9.152.114|this user]] might be going a little overboard with promoting the [[Alleria]] page. I'm leaning that way, but want a second opinion. --[[User:Nihonjoe|nihon]] 01:14, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
279373 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279372 +++$+++ 279372 +++$+++ 2005-12-02 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.133526420E09 +++$+++ Yes I think most of these edits border on vandalism. Most of them have been reverted now.  +++$+++ :Yes I think most of these edits border on vandalism. Most of them have been reverted now. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:27, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
279374 +++$+++ Nihonjoe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279372 +++$+++ 279373 +++$+++ 2005-12-02 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.133537580E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I was sure on some of them, but unsure on others. Thanks for checking. :-) -- +++$+++ ::Yeah, I was sure on some of them, but unsure on others. Thanks for checking. :-) --[[User:Nihonjoe|nihon]] 07:33, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
279375 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279372 +++$+++ 279372 +++$+++ 2005-12-02 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.133537640E09 +++$+++ You're welcome.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 07:34, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

17230 +++$+++ Enaidmawr +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-11 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.250059440E09 +++$+++ Hi, Hebrides. I've just come across the recently created - and soon to be deleted! - [[:category:Country]]. Having removed the sole category which had been wrongly placed there by its creator, it now only contains your sandbox. Somewhere in the text you must have '''''<nowiki>[[Category:Country]]<\/nowiki>''''' for some reason. I'd like to get the category speedily deleted but need it to be emptied first. Could you please check your page and remove the category (or if you need it as text only place a colon before it, thus - '''''<nowiki>[[:Category:Country]]<\/nowiki>''''' so it doesn't put your page in that category? Many thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, Hebrides. I've just come across the recently created - and soon to be deleted! - [[:category:Country]]. Having removed the sole category which had been wrongly placed there by its creator, it now only contains your sandbox. Somewhere in the text you must have '''''<nowiki>[[Category:Country]]</nowiki>''''' for some reason. I'd like to get the category speedily deleted but need it to be emptied first. Could you please check your page and remove the category (or if you need it as text only place a colon before it, thus - '''''<nowiki>[[:Category:Country]]</nowiki>''''' so it doesn't put your page in that category? Many thanks. [[User:Enaidmawr|Enaidmawr]] ([[User talk:Enaidmawr|talk]]) 23:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
17231 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17230 +++$+++ 17230 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 07:19:00 +++$+++ 1.250086740E09 +++$+++ No problem. I've removed it. It was in an experimentation section that I copied from somewhere and was trying out. I usually remember to deactivate category lines (eg if I userify a page to work on it) to prevent a sandbox appearing in the category, but this one slipped through the net! Cheers --  +++$+++ :No problem. I've removed it. It was in an experimentation section that I copied from somewhere and was trying out. I usually remember to deactivate category lines (eg if I userify a page to work on it) to prevent a sandbox appearing in the category, but this one slipped through the net! Cheers -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 07:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
17232 +++$+++ Enaidmawr +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17230 +++$+++ 17231 +++$+++ 2009-08-12 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.250126220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that. Didn't want to be cheeky and do it myself, even if I'd had the time to find it! Thanks again,  +++$+++ ::Thanks for that. Didn't want to be cheeky and do it myself, even if I'd had the time to find it! Thanks again, [[User:Enaidmawr|Enaidmawr]] ([[User talk:Enaidmawr|talk]]) 18:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

279376 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279376 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-07 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.133951400E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. [[User:Mathbot|Mathbot]] is saying \"hi\". He got over that \"bag of bits\" description, and is wondering why your newest talk page archive is not on your watchlist. Does it have anything to do with, uhm, you doing it under compulsion?  +++$+++ Hi Paul. [[User:Mathbot|Mathbot]] is saying "hi". He got over that "bag of bits" description, and is wondering why your newest talk page archive is not on your watchlist. Does it have anything to do with, uhm, you doing it under compulsion? [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 02:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
279377 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279376 +++$+++ 279376 +++$+++ 2005-12-07 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.133954040E09 +++$+++ How the hell does your bot know what is on my watch list?  +++$+++ :How the hell does your bot know what is on my watch list? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:14, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
279378 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279376 +++$+++ 279377 +++$+++ 2005-12-07 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.133954520E09 +++$+++ You  check your archive, bot said.  +++$+++ :: You  check your archive, bot said. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 03:22, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
279379 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279376 +++$+++ 279378 +++$+++ 2005-12-07 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.133956440E09 +++$+++ Hmmm \u2026 your bot seems to have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Paul_August\/Archive3&action=history \"created\"] my last archive file. What happened to the one ''I'' created? Would he care to explain?  +++$+++ ::: Hmmm … your bot seems to have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paul_August/Archive3&action=history "created"] my last archive file. What happened to the one ''I'' created? Would he care to explain? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

17233 +++$+++ Vejvančický +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-19 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.250741820E09 +++$+++ Hi Hebrides. Thanks a lot for your help there. I appreciate it. Have a nice day! -- +++$+++ Hi Hebrides. Thanks a lot for your help there. I appreciate it. Have a nice day! --[[User:Vejvančický|Vejvančický]] ([[User talk:Vejvančický|talk]]) 21:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
17234 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17233 +++$+++ 17233 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.250771760E09 +++$+++ Nice to hear from you, and to find out I've done something right! Keep up the good work. --  +++$+++ :Nice to hear from you, and to find out I've done something right! Keep up the good work. -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 05:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
17235 +++$+++ Vejvančický +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17233 +++$+++ 17234 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.250811060E09 +++$+++ ...a nice surprise in my watchlist! It's a rare phenomenon here on Wikipedia! Thanks again, Hebrides! :)) -- +++$+++ ::...a nice surprise in my watchlist! It's a rare phenomenon here on Wikipedia! Thanks again, Hebrides! :)) --[[User:Vejvančický|Vejvančický]] ([[User talk:Vejvančický|talk]]) 16:31, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

541522 +++$+++ B.Soto +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541522 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.176880980E09 +++$+++ We've undergone a great deal of trolling in the past that has essentially destroyed most of the original article in an attempt to show Liefeld in an entirely favorable light. I'd like to believe that isn't you. If your removal of the lead-in continues, I will be forced to contact admin.  +++$+++ We've undergone a great deal of trolling in the past that has essentially destroyed most of the original article in an attempt to show Liefeld in an entirely favorable light. I'd like to believe that isn't you. If your removal of the lead-in continues, I will be forced to contact admin. [[User:B.Soto|B.Soto]] 00:23, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
541523 +++$+++ Mordicai +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541522 +++$+++ 541522 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.176956460E09 +++$+++ B.Soto, the first, best thing to do is to [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assume good faith]] when it comes to other users.  If you have a concern about a users edits being \"bad faith,\" a good way to at least get a feel for them as an editor is to [[Special:Contributions\/Fordmadoxfraud|check their contributions]].  Hope this helps.  -- +++$+++ :B.Soto, the first, best thing to do is to [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assume good faith]] when it comes to other users.  If you have a concern about a users edits being "bad faith," a good way to at least get a feel for them as an editor is to [[Special:Contributions/Fordmadoxfraud|check their contributions]].  Hope this helps.  --[[User:Mordicai|mordicai.]] 21:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

17238 +++$+++ Henmor +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-26 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.251306060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Henmor|Henmor]] ([[User talk:Henmor|talk]]) 10:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
17239 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17238 +++$+++ 17238 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.251381060E09 +++$+++ I replied on your talk page :)  +++$+++ :I replied on your talk page :) [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 06:51, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

17240 +++$+++ DVD R W +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-13 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.252851600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for copy editing here[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Weizmann_House&diff=prev&oldid=313522242]. I meant to calculate the \"x years\" but \"several\" does just as well. Best,  +++$+++ Thanks for copy editing here[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weizmann_House&diff=prev&oldid=313522242]. I meant to calculate the "x years" but "several" does just as well. Best, [[User_talk:DVD R W|DVD]] 07:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
17241 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17240 +++$+++ 17240 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.252935060E09 +++$+++ Easy mistake to make \u2013 I've done it at least x times myself. It's an interesting and well-written article \u2013 thanks for all your hard work on WP. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Easy mistake to make – I've done it at least x times myself. It's an interesting and well-written article – thanks for all your hard work on WP. Cheers, [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 06:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

17242 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-13 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.252902060E09 +++$+++ Oh, God, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ion_Creang%C4%83&diff=313649969&oldid=313486248 yes]. Thank you for that.  +++$+++ Oh, God, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ion_Creang%C4%83&diff=313649969&oldid=313486248 yes]. Thank you for that. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn|talk]]) 21:21, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
17243 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17242 +++$+++ 17242 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.252935660E09 +++$+++ Mistakes are weird. When you read them yourself, the brain seems to have an autocorrect mechanism, and you read what you meant to write \u2013 that\u2019s what makes collaborative writing on WP so potentially powerful :) Cheers \u2013  +++$+++ :Mistakes are weird. When you read them yourself, the brain seems to have an autocorrect mechanism, and you read what you meant to write – that’s what makes collaborative writing on WP so potentially powerful :) Cheers – [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 06:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

279387 +++$+++ James Sullivan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-16 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.134740340E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:James Sullivan|Jim]] 05:39, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
279388 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279387 +++$+++ 279387 +++$+++ 2005-12-16 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.134741900E09 +++$+++ Finally a true scholar strides forth ;-) Thanks Jim, for the clarification.  +++$+++ :Finally a true scholar strides forth ;-) Thanks Jim, for the clarification. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 06:05, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
279389 +++$+++ Geogre +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279387 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-12-16 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.134786600E09 +++$+++ Hmmm, I wonder why I got the idea that it was related to \"horn,\" from the horn tabs used to mark chapters.  A \"lemma\" in a dictionary or encyclopedia, for example, is the keyword term being looked up.  (Hence, also \"dilemma\": between two horns.)  Well, I need to check my pillowcase to see if there was more to the story that leaked out overnight.  (And I'm a true scholar!  Only true scholars could get things like this wrong.)   +++$+++ :::Hmmm, I wonder why I got the idea that it was related to "horn," from the horn tabs used to mark chapters.  A "lemma" in a dictionary or encyclopedia, for example, is the keyword term being looked up.  (Hence, also "dilemma": between two horns.)  Well, I need to check my pillowcase to see if there was more to the story that leaked out overnight.  (And I'm a true scholar!  Only true scholars could get things like this wrong.)  [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 18:30, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
279390 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279387 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-12-16 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.134787680E09 +++$+++ Well Geogre, you certainly seem scholarly enough to me, but are you sure you are entirely true? You don't always seem completely square to me. And don't protest that you ''are'' a square, that's an entirely different thing.  +++$+++ ::::Well Geogre, you certainly seem scholarly enough to me, but are you sure you are entirely true? You don't always seem completely square to me. And don't protest that you ''are'' a square, that's an entirely different thing. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
279391 +++$+++ James Sullivan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279387 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-12-16 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.134790200E09 +++$+++ Don't want to overkill this, but the \"lemma\" as dictionary entry comes from the tradition of Alexandrian scholarship (that is, in the Museum of Alexandria in the Hellenistic and Roman eras).  In a classical text, if a word, or phrase was being discussed in a commentary, they would print the word or phrase being discussed.  It was thus \"taken\" out of the text.  The practice continues in modern commentaries.  Now sometimes, when you compare two texts, you may have two different diversions of a sentence, phrase or word.  This presents a \"dilemma\" in at least two senses, since you have two lemmata and, certainly, a problem.  The difficulty of resolving such dilemmata gave rise to the \"horn\" imagery, I suppose.  BTW, I performed a bit of organization on the [[History of the Peloponnesian War]] article.  I hope others (who are interested) join me in working on it.  Such a text deserves better treatment than its gotten so far!!  +++$+++ :::::Don't want to overkill this, but the "lemma" as dictionary entry comes from the tradition of Alexandrian scholarship (that is, in the Museum of Alexandria in the Hellenistic and Roman eras).  In a classical text, if a word, or phrase was being discussed in a commentary, they would print the word or phrase being discussed.  It was thus "taken" out of the text.  The practice continues in modern commentaries.  Now sometimes, when you compare two texts, you may have two different diversions of a sentence, phrase or word.  This presents a "dilemma" in at least two senses, since you have two lemmata and, certainly, a problem.  The difficulty of resolving such dilemmata gave rise to the "horn" imagery, I suppose.  BTW, I performed a bit of organization on the [[History of the Peloponnesian War]] article.  I hope others (who are interested) join me in working on it.  Such a text deserves better treatment than its gotten so far!! [[User:James Sullivan|Jim]] 19:30, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
279392 +++$+++ Geogre +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279387 +++$+++ 279388 +++$+++ 2005-12-18 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.134961500E09 +++$+++ Another case of my scholarly ''bona fides'' follows:  from the immortal [[Flann O'Brien|Myles]]:  \"I'm in a bit of a dilemma.  (How do you like his horns?)\"  I think in some way the \"horn\" derivation is somewhat more active, at least among us wordy folk.  It is quite possible that it's associative rather than etymological, that the \"lemma,\" as heading, derives from \"taking\/clipping,\" and that lemmae were so often marked with horn markers that \"horn\" became a dominant meaning for \"lemma\" among harmless drudges.  At any rate, whether I am fair or not depends upon whether I am right and regular.  I do what I can about regularity -- proper ruffage and the like -- and, going through every possible angle on a subject, I'm bound to hit 90 degrees sooner or later.   +++$+++ ::Another case of my scholarly ''bona fides'' follows:  from the immortal [[Flann O'Brien|Myles]]:  "I'm in a bit of a dilemma.  (How do you like his horns?)"  I think in some way the "horn" derivation is somewhat more active, at least among us wordy folk.  It is quite possible that it's associative rather than etymological, that the "lemma," as heading, derives from "taking/clipping," and that lemmae were so often marked with horn markers that "horn" became a dominant meaning for "lemma" among harmless drudges.  At any rate, whether I am fair or not depends upon whether I am right and regular.  I do what I can about regularity -- proper ruffage and the like -- and, going through every possible angle on a subject, I'm bound to hit 90 degrees sooner or later.  [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 19:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

17244 +++$+++ Fayenatic london +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-14 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.252989000E09 +++$+++ If you are interested in articles about names, please join [[WP:WikiProject Anthroponymy]]! -  +++$+++ If you are interested in articles about names, please join [[WP:WikiProject Anthroponymy]]! - [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User talk:Fayenatic london|(talk)]] 21:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
17245 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17244 +++$+++ 17244 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.253111160E09 +++$+++ Best regards,  +++$+++ :Best regards, [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 07:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
17246 +++$+++ Fayenatic london +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17244 +++$+++ 17245 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.253847300E09 +++$+++ As for multiple links: name pages should be articles, not just lists. Good ones have information on the origin, history, distribution, popularity, variants etc. A disam page is an informatively-structured index, which has strict style rules, but a name article can be more flexible. If a person is listed with an unusual profession\/specialism\/etc, I might want to click directly on the link to that subject without having first to navigate to the article on the person. That's my 2p worth, anyway!  +++$+++ ::As for multiple links: name pages should be articles, not just lists. Good ones have information on the origin, history, distribution, popularity, variants etc. A disam page is an informatively-structured index, which has strict style rules, but a name article can be more flexible. If a person is listed with an unusual profession/specialism/etc, I might want to click directly on the link to that subject without having first to navigate to the article on the person. That's my 2p worth, anyway! [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User talk:Fayenatic london|(talk)]] 19:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
17247 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17244 +++$+++ 17246 +++$+++ 2009-10-04 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.254672300E09 +++$+++ BTW, have you seen the excellent way they do name pages in Icelandic WP? I really like it. See, for example,  [[:is:Einar]] to see what I mean (or others in the category [[:is:Flokkur:\xcdslensk karlmannsn\xf6fn]]).  +++$+++ :::BTW, have you seen the excellent way they do name pages in Icelandic WP? I really like it. See, for example,  [[:is:Einar]] to see what I mean (or others in the category [[:is:Flokkur:Íslensk karlmannsnöfn]]). [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 09:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

541534 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-28 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.177823700E09 +++$+++ Also please [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assume good faith]] on the part of your fellow wiki editors, a sentiment which doesn't exactly ring out in your summary ''OR\/Neologism thrown together by one person with no real explanation''.  [[Lapsed lurker]] isn't the greatest article, but there are reasonable refs and information that I'm not convinced is 100% worthless or duplicated elsewhere.   +++$+++ Also please [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assume good faith]] on the part of your fellow wiki editors, a sentiment which doesn't exactly ring out in your summary ''OR/Neologism thrown together by one person with no real explanation''.  [[Lapsed lurker]] isn't the greatest article, but there are reasonable refs and information that I'm not convinced is 100% worthless or duplicated elsewhere.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 22:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
541535 +++$+++ DreamGuy +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541534 +++$+++ 541534 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.177824360E09 +++$+++ Did you look at the history of that article? The whole thing was written by one guy. \"OR\/Neologism thrown together by one person with no real explanation\" is 100% accurate and not assuming bad faith. I am sure he had good faith intentions, but that doesn't change the fact that it's an incoherent ramble saying nothing different from other pages and using a term NOBODY in the field uses. \"Lapsed lurker\" has only 600 some Google hits, mostly of mirrors of the Wikipedia article and some guy who happened to pick it as a user name.  +++$+++ :Did you look at the history of that article? The whole thing was written by one guy. "OR/Neologism thrown together by one person with no real explanation" is 100% accurate and not assuming bad faith. I am sure he had good faith intentions, but that doesn't change the fact that it's an incoherent ramble saying nothing different from other pages and using a term NOBODY in the field uses. "Lapsed lurker" has only 600 some Google hits, mostly of mirrors of the Wikipedia article and some guy who happened to pick it as a user name. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] 22:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

17248 +++$+++ Teapotgeorge +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-01 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.254458400E09 +++$+++ Good work! Well done. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">'''<font color=\"Black\">[[User:Teapotgeorge|Teapot]]<\/font>'''<font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ Good work! Well done. <span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''<font color="Black">[[User:Teapotgeorge|Teapot]]</font>'''<font color="silver">[[User:Teapotgeorge|george]]</font></span>[[User talk:Teapotgeorge|<sup><font color="blue">Talk</font></sup>]] 21:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
17249 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17248 +++$+++ 17248 +++$+++ 2009-10-01 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.254458700E09 +++$+++ Thanks :)  +++$+++ :Thanks :) [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 21:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

541537 +++$+++ Severa +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-12 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.178953620E09 +++$+++ Why did you place a speedy deletion notice for [[Bronze rule]] on my user talk page? I never even touched that article, let alone created it. I see above that another editor has experienced something similar. Please be more mindful in the future. Thank you.  - +++$+++ Why did you place a speedy deletion notice for [[Bronze rule]] on my user talk page? I never even touched that article, let alone created it. I see above that another editor has experienced something similar. Please be more mindful in the future. Thank you.  -[[User:Severa|Severa]]  ([[User talk:Severa|!!!]]) 00:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
541538 +++$+++ Severa +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541537 +++$+++ 541537 +++$+++ 2007-05-12 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.178957100E09 +++$+++ Here's an explanation: I [[Wikipedia:Changing_username\/Archive7#User:Kyd|changed]] my username from \"Kyd\" to \"Severa\" in March 2006. [[User talk:Kyd]] redirects to [[User talk:Severa]] for that reason. Someone opened a new account under my old username and this \"Kyd\" is the person who made the problematic edits in question. - +++$+++ :Here's an explanation: I [[Wikipedia:Changing_username/Archive7#User:Kyd|changed]] my username from "Kyd" to "Severa" in March 2006. [[User talk:Kyd]] redirects to [[User talk:Severa]] for that reason. Someone opened a new account under my old username and this "Kyd" is the person who made the problematic edits in question. -[[User:Severa|Severa]]  ([[User talk:Severa|!!!]]) 01:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
541539 +++$+++ Severa +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541537 +++$+++ 541538 +++$+++ 2007-05-12 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.178957580E09 +++$+++ Go to [[User talk:Majorly]]. I saw the post you had made on this editor's page. Majorly replied explaining that the editor who created the \"Bronze rule\" article had the username Kyd, and, when I read that, it all made sense. - +++$+++ ::Go to [[User talk:Majorly]]. I saw the post you had made on this editor's page. Majorly replied explaining that the editor who created the "Bronze rule" article had the username Kyd, and, when I read that, it all made sense. -[[User:Severa|Severa]]  ([[User talk:Severa|!!!]]) 01:13, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
541540 +++$+++ Severa +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541537 +++$+++ 541539 +++$+++ 2007-05-12 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.178957820E09 +++$+++ Also saw that that new-Kyd has a total of zero contribs to his or her name now that the \"Bronze rule\" article has been speedied. I'm hoping this is just one of those one-off accounts some problematic editors register for making a couple of hit-and-run edits \u2014 I really want to keep my dang redirect. :-) - +++$+++ :::Also saw that that new-Kyd has a total of zero contribs to his or her name now that the "Bronze rule" article has been speedied. I'm hoping this is just one of those one-off accounts some problematic editors register for making a couple of hit-and-run edits — I really want to keep my dang redirect. :-) -[[User:Severa|Severa]]  ([[User talk:Severa|!!!]]) 01:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
541541 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541537 +++$+++ 541540 +++$+++ 2007-05-12 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.178957940E09 +++$+++ Yeah, Wikipedia should have a better mechanism for dealing with this.   +++$+++ ::::Yeah, Wikipedia should have a better mechanism for dealing with this.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 01:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
541542 +++$+++ Mordicai +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541537 +++$+++ 541537 +++$+++ 2007-05-12 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.179013740E09 +++$+++ You tell him!  -- +++$+++ :You tell him!  --[[User:Mordicai|mordicai.]] 16:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
541543 +++$+++ Wrp103 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541537 +++$+++ 541537 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.179138960E09 +++$+++ Please remember that a vandal has to receive a final warning and continue to vandalize before they can be blocked.  Your request for blocking the above editor was made before that final warning.  I've added a final warning to their talk page.  If they continue to vandalize, please report them again. Thanks for helping Wikipedia!  +++$+++ :Please remember that a vandal has to receive a final warning and continue to vandalize before they can be blocked.  Your request for blocking the above editor was made before that final warning.  I've added a final warning to their talk page.  If they continue to vandalize, please report them again. Thanks for helping Wikipedia! [[User:wrp103|wrp103 (Bill Pringle)]]  [[User talk:wrp103|<sup>(Talk)</sup>]] 03:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

17250 +++$+++ Bukubku +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-04 08:31:00 +++$+++ 1.254670260E09 +++$+++ A. M. Nair founded the restaurant in 1949. And now his son G. M. Nair is the master. The restaurant is very famous as authentic Indian food. Ok? See [http:\/\/www.ginza-nair.co.jp\/history.html]-- +++$+++ A. M. Nair founded the restaurant in 1949. And now his son G. M. Nair is the master. The restaurant is very famous as authentic Indian food. Ok? See [http://www.ginza-nair.co.jp/history.html]--[[User:Bukubku|Bukubku]] ([[User talk:Bukubku|talk]]) 08:31, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
17251 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17250 +++$+++ 17250 +++$+++ 2009-10-04 08:37:00 +++$+++ 1.254670620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for contacting me. I've replaced the link with a little more explanatory text so that nobody else makes the same mistake as I did! Best regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks for contacting me. I've replaced the link with a little more explanatory text so that nobody else makes the same mistake as I did! Best regards, [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 08:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
17252 +++$+++ Bukubku +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17250 +++$+++ 17251 +++$+++ 2009-10-04 08:40:00 +++$+++ 1.254670800E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your understanding. He also published his autobiography book in Japan.[http:\/\/www.amazon.co.jp\/%E7%9F%A5%E3%82%89%E3%82%8C%E3%81%96%E3%82%8B%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3%E3%83%89%E7%8B%AC%E7%AB%8B%E9%97%98%E4%BA%89%E2%80%95-%E3%83%BBM%E3%83%BB%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB%E5%9B%9E%E6%83%B3%E9%8C%B2-M-%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB\/dp\/4892193062\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1254643825&sr=1-1] And his son published book about curry.[http:\/\/www.amazon.co.jp\/%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB%E3%81%95%E3%82%93%E3%81%AE%E3%82%AB%E3%83%AC%E3%83%BC%E5%A4%A9%E5%9B%BD-G-M-%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB\/dp\/4838713134\/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1254643818&sr=1-2] They are famous.-- +++$+++ ::Thank you for your understanding. He also published his autobiography book in Japan.[http://www.amazon.co.jp/%E7%9F%A5%E3%82%89%E3%82%8C%E3%81%96%E3%82%8B%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3%E3%83%89%E7%8B%AC%E7%AB%8B%E9%97%98%E4%BA%89%E2%80%95-%E3%83%BBM%E3%83%BB%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB%E5%9B%9E%E6%83%B3%E9%8C%B2-M-%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB/dp/4892193062/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1254643825&sr=1-1] And his son published book about curry.[http://www.amazon.co.jp/%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB%E3%81%95%E3%82%93%E3%81%AE%E3%82%AB%E3%83%AC%E3%83%BC%E5%A4%A9%E5%9B%BD-G-M-%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB/dp/4838713134/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1254643818&sr=1-2] They are famous.--[[User:Bukubku|Bukubku]] ([[User talk:Bukubku|talk]]) 08:40, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
17253 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17250 +++$+++ 17250 +++$+++ 2009-10-08 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.255005900E09 +++$+++ Thanks to your friend for spotting this one. I reverted it. I\u2019ve added this page to my watchlist so that I\u2019ll know when it\u2019s been changed, and can keep an eye on it. The bot edit that also got reverted in the process had just added back all the links to other language wikis that the vandal had removed. The anonymous vandal is the IP address of Manor Independent School District, Texas (see their talk page for all the warnings and blocking), and I've also just reverted their edit to [[Allen Brown]]. Cheers -  +++$+++ :Thanks to your friend for spotting this one. I reverted it. I’ve added this page to my watchlist so that I’ll know when it’s been changed, and can keep an eye on it. The bot edit that also got reverted in the process had just added back all the links to other language wikis that the vandal had removed. The anonymous vandal is the IP address of Manor Independent School District, Texas (see their talk page for all the warnings and blocking), and I've also just reverted their edit to [[Allen Brown]]. Cheers - [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 05:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

279396 +++$+++ Filiocht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279396 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-15 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.134663480E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to congratulate you on the clarity and good sense of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Webcomics\/Workshop&diff=31429331&oldid=31421101 this] edit.  +++$+++ I just wanted to congratulate you on the clarity and good sense of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Webcomics/Workshop&diff=31429331&oldid=31421101 this] edit. [[User:Filiocht|Filiocht]] | [[User talk:Filiocht|The kettle's on]] 08:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
279397 +++$+++ Geogre +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279396 +++$+++ 279396 +++$+++ 2005-12-15 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.134675000E09 +++$+++ Hah!  I just came here from reading the very same thing! :-)   +++$+++ :Hah!  I just came here from reading the very same thing! :-)  [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 11:30, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

17254 +++$+++ GeorgeLouis +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-02 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.257150540E09 +++$+++ I don't understand what you did on the last two revisions. The explanation is written in a shorthand that is not familiar to me. http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Centennial%2C_California&action=historysubmit&diff=323242991&oldid=322639021 . Sincerely, your friend,  +++$+++ I don't understand what you did on the last two revisions. The explanation is written in a shorthand that is not familiar to me. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Centennial%2C_California&action=historysubmit&diff=323242991&oldid=322639021 . Sincerely, your friend, [[User:GeorgeLouis|GeorgeLouis]] ([[User talk:GeorgeLouis|talk]]) 00:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
17255 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17254 +++$+++ 17254 +++$+++ 2009-11-02 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.257173100E09 +++$+++ I do check the changes very carefully before committing them, because there are some exceptions (like, for example, some URLs that have commas in them). But unfortunately the usual Wikipedia ''diff'' display doesn't highlight spaces that are inserted or deleted. After looking at the ''diff'' display I can understand why you were puzzled. Best regards,  +++$+++ :I do check the changes very carefully before committing them, because there are some exceptions (like, for example, some URLs that have commas in them). But unfortunately the usual Wikipedia ''diff'' display doesn't highlight spaces that are inserted or deleted. After looking at the ''diff'' display I can understand why you were puzzled. Best regards, [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 06:45, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
17256 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17254 +++$+++ 17255 +++$+++ 2009-11-02 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.257204660E09 +++$+++ I was going to ask this question regarding [[Buckeye, Arizona]]; thanks for the detailed explanation.   +++$+++ ::I was going to ask this question regarding [[Buckeye, Arizona]]; thanks for the detailed explanation.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 15:31, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

279399 +++$+++ Master Jay +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279399 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-22 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.135251900E09 +++$+++ I see what you mean. I used the rollback button - perhaps that was the reason. --Jay '''( +++$+++ I see what you mean. I used the rollback button - perhaps that was the reason. --Jay '''([[User talk:Master Jay|Reply]])''' 03:45, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
279400 +++$+++ Master Jay +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279399 +++$+++ 279399 +++$+++ 2005-12-22 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.135318980E09 +++$+++ Hold the phone! The rollback button that I use is the same standard button available from Sam Hocevar. The hundreds of rollbacks I've done are in good order. Perhaps the problem is with the \"updated\" version I installed from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts\/Scripts#Independent modules|here]], which supposedly addresses an even worse malfunction with rollback when using automated popups. Given the fact that I seldom use those popups for anything, and the fact that I find them more annoying than helpful, I will immediately go back to the original version by Hocevar, rather than the \"updated\" version. --Jay '''( +++$+++ :Hold the phone! The rollback button that I use is the same standard button available from Sam Hocevar. The hundreds of rollbacks I've done are in good order. Perhaps the problem is with the "updated" version I installed from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts#Independent modules|here]], which supposedly addresses an even worse malfunction with rollback when using automated popups. Given the fact that I seldom use those popups for anything, and the fact that I find them more annoying than helpful, I will immediately go back to the original version by Hocevar, rather than the "updated" version. --Jay '''([[User talk:Master Jay|Reply]])''' 22:23, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

17258 +++$+++ Lecen +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-25 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.264452840E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your help! -- +++$+++ Thank you for your help! --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 12:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
17259 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17258 +++$+++ 17258 +++$+++ 2010-01-25 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.264453080E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! That's what Wikipedia is all about. --  +++$+++ :You're welcome! That's what Wikipedia is all about. -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 12:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

17260 +++$+++ Katr67 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-07 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.265593860E09 +++$+++ Hiya. I thought I would point out that you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Kenton,_Portland,_Oregon&diff=342470305&oldid=301372757 tried to move their statue]. It's a little heavy, I think, to take across state lines. Do be sure to check for context when wikilinking. Cheers!  +++$+++ Hiya. I thought I would point out that you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kenton,_Portland,_Oregon&diff=342470305&oldid=301372757 tried to move their statue]. It's a little heavy, I think, to take across state lines. Do be sure to check for context when wikilinking. Cheers! [[User:Katr67|Katr67]] 17:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
17261 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17260 +++$+++ 17260 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.265595540E09 +++$+++ Oops! Thanks for spotting that and carrying it back for me. Concentration must have lapsed a little :( Cheers! --  +++$+++ :Oops! Thanks for spotting that and carrying it back for me. Concentration must have lapsed a little :( Cheers! -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 18:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

279405 +++$+++ Metacomet +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279405 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-24 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.135426200E09 +++$+++ Thank you for correcting the recent revision to [[Euler's identity]] where the (unkown) editor claimed that <math>-i \\, <\/math> is ''not'' one of the two square roots of <math>-1 \\, <\/math>.  I was pleased that someone was paying attention and made the correction.  Thanks again.  --  +++$+++ Thank you for correcting the recent revision to [[Euler's identity]] where the (unkown) editor claimed that <math>-i \, </math> is ''not'' one of the two square roots of <math>-1 \, </math>.  I was pleased that someone was paying attention and made the correction.  Thanks again.  -- [[User:Metacomet|Metacomet]] 04:10, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
279406 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279405 +++$+++ 279405 +++$+++ 2005-12-24 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.135426620E09 +++$+++ Your welcome.  +++$+++ :Your welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

17262 +++$+++ Boleyn3 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-09 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.265772120E09 +++$+++ Hello, just to let you know that this page has been nominated for deletion using [[Template:db-disambig]]. If you have any questions about this, please contact me. Best wishes,  +++$+++ Hello, just to let you know that this page has been nominated for deletion using [[Template:db-disambig]]. If you have any questions about this, please contact me. Best wishes, [[User:Boleyn3|Boleyn3]] ([[User talk:Boleyn3|talk]]) 19:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
17263 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17262 +++$+++ 17262 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.265775540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your note. However, by the time I had logged in, the page had disappeared. Speedy indeed! No chance for me to say whether it was \"work in progress\" or whatever. Was it actually an orphan as the tag says? --  +++$+++ :Thanks for your note. However, by the time I had logged in, the page had disappeared. Speedy indeed! No chance for me to say whether it was "work in progress" or whatever. Was it actually an orphan as the tag says? -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

279407 +++$+++ WAvegetarian +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-29 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.135863660E09 +++$+++ I don't understand what's going on with that. It has happened to me twice now. I followed the standard procedure for a revert, ''id est'' (when in Rome) went to the history and edited the penultimate version and saved it without making any changes. Why is that deleting sections?  +++$+++ I don't understand what's going on with that. It has happened to me twice now. I followed the standard procedure for a revert, ''id est'' (when in Rome) went to the history and edited the penultimate version and saved it without making any changes. Why is that deleting sections? [[User:WAvegetarian|WAvegetarian]] [[User talk:WAvegetarian|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]  <small>[[Special:Emailuser/WAvegetarian|(email)]]</small>  [[Special:Contributions/WAvegetarian| <sup>(contribs)</sup>]] 05:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
279408 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279407 +++$+++ 279407 +++$+++ 2005-12-29 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.135863960E09 +++$+++ I don't know why, but I think I've seen that before (perhaps because of an edit conflict?) Anyway I didn't think you did it on purpose.  +++$+++ :I don't know why, but I think I've seen that before (perhaps because of an edit conflict?) Anyway I didn't think you did it on purpose. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
279409 +++$+++ WAvegetarian +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279407 +++$+++ 279408 +++$+++ 2005-12-29 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.135868940E09 +++$+++ Looking at the edit histories seems to rule out an edit conflict. There's only one thing I can think of. It's only happened to me on the Caesar article and the Help and Reference desk pages, all of which are very long. Maybe my browser,  currently IE 5.1 as I am editing from an ancient pre-OS X Mac, can't load the full code into the edit box. Hmm, anyway I should be back to my iBook G4 and Tiger OS tomorrow. I'll mention it on the tech page at the village pump. Thanks for assuming good faith,  +++$+++ ::Looking at the edit histories seems to rule out an edit conflict. There's only one thing I can think of. It's only happened to me on the Caesar article and the Help and Reference desk pages, all of which are very long. Maybe my browser,  currently IE 5.1 as I am editing from an ancient pre-OS X Mac, can't load the full code into the edit box. Hmm, anyway I should be back to my iBook G4 and Tiger OS tomorrow. I'll mention it on the tech page at the village pump. Thanks for assuming good faith, [[User:WAvegetarian|WAvegetarian]] [[User talk:WAvegetarian|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]  <small>[[Special:Emailuser/WAvegetarian|(email)]]</small>  [[Special:Contributions/WAvegetarian| <sup>(contribs)</sup>]] 07:09, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
279410 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279407 +++$+++ 279407 +++$+++ 2005-12-29 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.135869120E09 +++$+++ Yes I think that could be it.  +++$+++ :Yes I think that could be it. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 07:12, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

17264 +++$+++ KitemanSA +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-13 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.266098760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your work on \"Polywell\"  :)   +++$+++ Thanks for your work on "Polywell"  :)  [[User:KitemanSA|KitemanSA]] ([[User talk:KitemanSA|talk]]) 14:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
17265 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17264 +++$+++ 17264 +++$+++ 2010-02-21 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.266784920E09 +++$+++ My pleasure. --  +++$+++ : My pleasure. -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 12:42, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

570856 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570856 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-01 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.157119800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.msc]] [[Image:DFRG. MSC.jpg|10px|User talk:Dfrg.msc|]] 07:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
570857 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570856 +++$+++ 570856 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.157120640E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I'd love to help you on your page. Do you want anything specific?   +++$+++ : Anyway, I'd love to help you on your page. Do you want anything specific?  [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.msc]] [[Image:DFRG. MSC.jpg|10px|User talk:Dfrg.msc|]] 07:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
570858 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570856 +++$+++ 570856 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.157132040E09 +++$+++ Also, the link is broken so I can't go to your page.  +++$+++ : Also, the link is broken so I can't go to your page. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.msc]] [[Image:DFRG. MSC.jpg|10px|User talk:Dfrg.msc|]] 10:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

17266 +++$+++ Steinbach +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-14 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.266176220E09 +++$+++ Do they exist?  +++$+++ Do they exist? [[User:Steinbach|Steinbach]] ([[User talk:Steinbach|talk]]) 11:37, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
17267 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17266 +++$+++ 17266 +++$+++ 2010-02-21 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.266784860E09 +++$+++ LOL! --  +++$+++ :LOL! -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 12:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
17268 +++$+++ Steinbach +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17266 +++$+++ 17267 +++$+++ 2010-02-23 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.266967380E09 +++$+++ That means not, I presume? :p Too bad, I am a musicology student and I would have loved to order some...  +++$+++ ::That means not, I presume? :p Too bad, I am a musicology student and I would have loved to order some... [[User:Steinbach|Steinbach]] ([[User talk:Steinbach|talk]]) 15:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

279411 +++$+++ David618 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-29 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.135902780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:David618|David618]] 16:33, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
279412 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279411 +++$+++ 279411 +++$+++ 2005-12-29 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.135905000E09 +++$+++ Hello David, welcome to Wikipedia. Our policy concerning Date eras, is that either BC\/AD or BCE\/CE are acceptable, but should be used consistently within an article, see [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Eras]]. Also in order to eliminate edit warring over this, the accepted practice is not to change an article which has consistently used one nomenclature to the other (unless it is to revert such a change). In the case of [[Julius Caesar]] the article has consistently used BC\/AD, until three days ago, when the IP 68.45.233.185 changed the article to use BCE\/CE. My edit was to simply to undo that. Does that make sense? Regards,  +++$+++ :Hello David, welcome to Wikipedia. Our policy concerning Date eras, is that either BC/AD or BCE/CE are acceptable, but should be used consistently within an article, see [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Eras]]. Also in order to eliminate edit warring over this, the accepted practice is not to change an article which has consistently used one nomenclature to the other (unless it is to revert such a change). In the case of [[Julius Caesar]] the article has consistently used BC/AD, until three days ago, when the IP 68.45.233.185 changed the article to use BCE/CE. My edit was to simply to undo that. Does that make sense? Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
279413 +++$+++ David618 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279411 +++$+++ 279412 +++$+++ 2005-12-29 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.135915080E09 +++$+++ I am fully aware of the Wikipedia Manual of Style.  Though it says that both are acceptable, the guide then uses Common Era, which implies that it is preferable to use B\/CE.  Furthermore it is generally accepted that Common Era is more professional and if Wikipedia truly wishes to be considered a reliable source then it should try at the very least to look professional. +++$+++ ::I am fully aware of the Wikipedia Manual of Style.  Though it says that both are acceptable, the guide then uses Common Era, which implies that it is preferable to use B/CE.  Furthermore it is generally accepted that Common Era is more professional and if Wikipedia truly wishes to be considered a reliable source then it should try at the very least to look professional.[[User:David618|David618]] 19:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
279414 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279411 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2005-12-29 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.135918620E09 +++$+++ David, I think you are mistaken about there being any implied preference in the Manual of Style for either notation. I believe that Wikipedia is currently officially neutral between the two. And as I said it is an agreed upon practice to leave articles the way they are, in that regard. However as Oleg suggests below if you can convince the other editors at [[talk:Julius Caesar]] then a switch might be made. However be aware that that this issue has been ''repeatedly'' discussed, and ''many'' editors have ''strong'' feelings on both sides of the issue, so at the moment, it is doubtful that a consensus can be achieved on this. Given the lack of a consensus the above policy and practice is a compromise designed to help quell the endless edit warring that has occurred around this issue.  +++$+++ ::::David, I think you are mistaken about there being any implied preference in the Manual of Style for either notation. I believe that Wikipedia is currently officially neutral between the two. And as I said it is an agreed upon practice to leave articles the way they are, in that regard. However as Oleg suggests below if you can convince the other editors at [[talk:Julius Caesar]] then a switch might be made. However be aware that that this issue has been ''repeatedly'' discussed, and ''many'' editors have ''strong'' feelings on both sides of the issue, so at the moment, it is doubtful that a consensus can be achieved on this. Given the lack of a consensus the above policy and practice is a compromise designed to help quell the endless edit warring that has occurred around this issue. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
279415 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279411 +++$+++ 279413 +++$+++ 2005-12-29 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.135916460E09 +++$+++ If I am allowed to squeak in, maybe there should be some discussion at [[talk:Julius Caesar]] where the editors would express their opinions on the matter, with the dates staying for the time as they were before this started, that is, BC\/AD. No?  +++$+++ ::: If I am allowed to squeak in, maybe there should be some discussion at [[talk:Julius Caesar]] where the editors would express their opinions on the matter, with the dates staying for the time as they were before this started, that is, BC/AD. No? [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 20:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

17269 +++$+++ EJohn59 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-24 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.267013340E09 +++$+++ Dear Hebrides, with your usual perspicacious quick wit, perhaps you can uncover what's going on in [[Aerospace]]. Look at the several suspicious language choices. It's suspect. EJ-- +++$+++ Dear Hebrides, with your usual perspicacious quick wit, perhaps you can uncover what's going on in [[Aerospace]]. Look at the several suspicious language choices. It's suspect. EJ--[[User:EJohn59|EJohn59]] ([[User talk:EJohn59|talk]]) 04:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
17270 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17269 +++$+++ 17269 +++$+++ 2010-02-24 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.267044360E09 +++$+++ Interesting\u2026 Doing [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Aerospace&diff=339953654&oldid=321533103 a comparison of 23 October 2009 with today's version] shows most changes have been reverted. All that survived is addition of a mention of MacDonald Dettwiler and of BAE Systems, and the removal of eo:Aerokosma flugadiko \u2013 which I have replaced. The reverted changes seem to be variants on commercial interests, spam links and purposeless vandalism. Did you have any hypotheses in mind? --  +++$+++ :Interesting… Doing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aerospace&diff=339953654&oldid=321533103 a comparison of 23 October 2009 with today's version] shows most changes have been reverted. All that survived is addition of a mention of MacDonald Dettwiler and of BAE Systems, and the removal of eo:Aerokosma flugadiko – which I have replaced. The reverted changes seem to be variants on commercial interests, spam links and purposeless vandalism. Did you have any hypotheses in mind? -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 12:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
17271 +++$+++ EJohn59 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17269 +++$+++ 17270 +++$+++ 2010-02-25 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.267104960E09 +++$+++ I'm more intrigued with the language pane. Suspect that someone vandalized by taking out the French, German, Chinese and Japanese versions, and put in the less popular languages, one of which is totally bogus. Absence of those other major languages is too surprising. EJ-- +++$+++ ::I'm more intrigued with the language pane. Suspect that someone vandalized by taking out the French, German, Chinese and Japanese versions, and put in the less popular languages, one of which is totally bogus. Absence of those other major languages is too surprising. EJ--[[User:EJohn59|EJohn59]] ([[User talk:EJohn59|talk]]) 05:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

17272 +++$+++ Torbenbrinker +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-03 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.267656180E09 +++$+++ thanks for correcting my new article [[Lappenberg]]. If you have time, please correct my article [[Upended Sugarloaf, Hildesheim|Upended Sugarloaf]], too. English is not my mother tongue. Thanks a lot, -- +++$+++ thanks for correcting my new article [[Lappenberg]]. If you have time, please correct my article [[Upended Sugarloaf, Hildesheim|Upended Sugarloaf]], too. English is not my mother tongue. Thanks a lot, --[[User:Torbenbrinker|Torbenbrinker]] ([[User talk:Torbenbrinker|talk]]) 14:43, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
17273 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17272 +++$+++ 17272 +++$+++ 2010-03-03 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.267656660E09 +++$+++ This is what I like about Wikipedia \u2013 we can work together, correct each other's mistakes, work in harmony \u2013 that's the way it should be. I know how you feel \u2013 I'm always very relieved when I write something on French or German wikipedia, and some kind editor goes through and corrects all my language errors! Best wishes --  +++$+++ :This is what I like about Wikipedia – we can work together, correct each other's mistakes, work in harmony – that's the way it should be. I know how you feel – I'm always very relieved when I write something on French or German wikipedia, and some kind editor goes through and corrects all my language errors! Best wishes -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 14:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

17274 +++$+++ Torbenbrinker +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-03 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.267677180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for correcting so quickly. There are many sights in [[Hildesheim]], but few articles in English. I intend to write and to translate some more and I'll ask you to correct them. We don't have many tourists from the English speaking world and I hope to attract some more by publishing more articles with photos. Thanks in anticipation,-- +++$+++ Thanks for correcting so quickly. There are many sights in [[Hildesheim]], but few articles in English. I intend to write and to translate some more and I'll ask you to correct them. We don't have many tourists from the English speaking world and I hope to attract some more by publishing more articles with photos. Thanks in anticipation,--[[User:Torbenbrinker|Torbenbrinker]] ([[User talk:Torbenbrinker|talk]]) 20:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
17275 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17274 +++$+++ 17274 +++$+++ 2010-03-03 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.267684260E09 +++$+++ I'll be happy to do that. [[Hildesheim]] looks to be a very attractive city. Let me know when you have translated any pages and I'll check them. This will be interesting. Regards, -- +++$+++ :I'll be happy to do that. [[Hildesheim]] looks to be a very attractive city. Let me know when you have translated any pages and I'll check them. This will be interesting. Regards, --[[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 22:31, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

279420 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-01 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.136154360E09 +++$+++ Happy New Year! :-)  +++$+++ Happy New Year! :-) [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 14:26, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
279421 +++$+++ Giano +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279420 +++$+++ 279420 +++$+++ 2006-01-02 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.136235840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message, happy New Year to you too!  +++$+++ *Thanks for the message, happy New Year to you too! [[User:Giano|Giano]] | [[User talk:Giano|talk]] 13:04, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

17279 +++$+++ Torbenbrinker +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17279 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-11 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.268336460E09 +++$+++ Dear Hebrides, I wrote an article on a castle in Hildesheim and on the [[Butchers' Guild Hall, Hildesheim]]. Please correct them if you have time. Regards, -- +++$+++ Dear Hebrides, I wrote an article on a castle in Hildesheim and on the [[Butchers' Guild Hall, Hildesheim]]. Please correct them if you have time. Regards, --[[User:Torbenbrinker|Torbenbrinker]] ([[User talk:Torbenbrinker|talk]]) 11:41, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
17280 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17279 +++$+++ 17279 +++$+++ 2010-03-11 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.268374800E09 +++$+++ I've done that \u2013 just a few small changes. This is another fascinating article. Thank you for all your hard work. Regards, --  +++$+++ :I've done that – just a few small changes. This is another fascinating article. Thank you for all your hard work. Regards, -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 22:20, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

279424 +++$+++ Rick Norwood +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279424 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-24 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.138169640E09 +++$+++ thanks  +++$+++ thanks [[User:Rick Norwood|Rick Norwood]] 22:14, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
279425 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279424 +++$+++ 279424 +++$+++ 2006-01-24 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.138170000E09 +++$+++ No problem.  +++$+++ : No problem. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

17281 +++$+++ Raymondwinn +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17281 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-13 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.268510640E09 +++$+++ You recently changed the [[Anketell (disambiguation)]] page to remove spaces in the years of birth and death, and you reference the WP:MOS.  However, I looked at the referenced page, and I do not see any such directive.  Would you please enlighten me further?  Thanks in advance.  +++$+++ You recently changed the [[Anketell (disambiguation)]] page to remove spaces in the years of birth and death, and you reference the WP:MOS.  However, I looked at the referenced page, and I do not see any such directive.  Would you please enlighten me further?  Thanks in advance. [[User:Raymondwinn|Raymondwinn]] ([[User talk:Raymondwinn|talk]]) 12:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
17282 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17281 +++$+++ 17281 +++$+++ 2010-03-13 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.268512380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your work on Wikipedia, and best wishes, --  +++$+++ :Thanks for your work on Wikipedia, and best wishes, -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 12:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

279426 +++$+++ Mindspillage +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-24 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.138170420E09 +++$+++ For your support and congratulations! (Now, if only Filiocht would return from his vacation... besides, he's just about out of tea. Don't suppose you've heard from him?)  +++$+++ For your support and congratulations! (Now, if only Filiocht would return from his vacation... besides, he's just about out of tea. Don't suppose you've heard from him?) [[User:Mindspillage|Mindspillage]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill yours?)]] 22:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
279427 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279426 +++$+++ 279426 +++$+++ 2006-01-24 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.138171500E09 +++$+++ You're most welcome for both. Yes if only &mdash; and all the milks gone sour! No I've not heard from him. Hopefully he's on an extended,  and much deserved, holiday.  +++$+++ :You're most welcome for both. Yes if only &mdash; and all the milks gone sour! No I've not heard from him. Hopefully he's on an extended,  and much deserved, holiday. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

17283 +++$+++ Torbenbrinker +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-13 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.268539620E09 +++$+++ Dear Hebrides, I have just finished a new article on another castle in Hildesheim. Some sentences are similar to the text of Marienburg Castle, as the architecture and history are very similar. Regards, -- +++$+++ Dear Hebrides, I have just finished a new article on another castle in Hildesheim. Some sentences are similar to the text of Marienburg Castle, as the architecture and history are very similar. Regards, --[[User:Torbenbrinker|Torbenbrinker]] ([[User talk:Torbenbrinker|talk]]) 20:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
17284 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17283 +++$+++ 17283 +++$+++ 2010-03-13 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.268542560E09 +++$+++ Another excellent article. I just made a few small changes. Your articles read well, they are logically structured, and the good range of photographs really makes the descriptions come alive. Thank you. --  +++$+++ :Another excellent article. I just made a few small changes. Your articles read well, they are logically structured, and the good range of photographs really makes the descriptions come alive. Thank you. -- [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:56, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

279428 +++$+++ Alexander 007 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-25 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.138243920E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. While new sections have to go at the bottom of the page, new comments pertaining to an old section may be posted in an older section. At least, that is the traditional practice in Wiki, whether or not it is official. On the other hand, one can choose to archive.  +++$+++ Hi Paul. While new sections have to go at the bottom of the page, new comments pertaining to an old section may be posted in an older section. At least, that is the traditional practice in Wiki, whether or not it is official. On the other hand, one can choose to archive. [[User:Alexander 007|Alexander 007]] 18:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
279429 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279428 +++$+++ 279428 +++$+++ 2006-01-25 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.138244460E09 +++$+++ Hi Alex ;-) I suppose you are referring to the note: \"New comments at bottom, please\" at the top of [[Talk:Alexander the Great]]. Yes you are correct about the proper placement of new comments. I didn't write that note but simply made it bold to indicate it was a note. I think it was trying to express what you were saying above, but ambiguously. Feel free to change it.  +++$+++ :Hi Alex ;-) I suppose you are referring to the note: "New comments at bottom, please" at the top of [[Talk:Alexander the Great]]. Yes you are correct about the proper placement of new comments. I didn't write that note but simply made it bold to indicate it was a note. I think it was trying to express what you were saying above, but ambiguously. Feel free to change it. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:01, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

17286 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17286 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-26 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.269665100E09 +++$+++ Thanks. That's it for me today. +++$+++ Thanks. That's it for me today.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 21:45, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
17287 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17286 +++$+++ 17286 +++$+++ 2010-03-27 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.269747480E09 +++$+++ Glad to help :) -- +++$+++ :Glad to help :) --[[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:38, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
17288 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17286 +++$+++ 17287 +++$+++ 2010-03-29 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.269916620E09 +++$+++ Do you just do those nbsp fixes, or do you look at content as well? I have added to one of those articles you fixed. +++$+++ ::Do you just do those nbsp fixes, or do you look at content as well? I have added to one of those articles you fixed.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 19:37, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
17289 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17286 +++$+++ 17288 +++$+++ 2010-03-29 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.269918000E09 +++$+++ Sometimes I do some serious content editing; sometimes I create a few new pages; other times I'm tired after a day at work, and just do a bit of gentle search-and-replace editing. It also depends whether the subject is something I'm into. I did a quick search\/replace scan through some pages you've been working on, but there was not much to change. As for content, your articles aren't really my area of expertise, so I'll leave that to subject-matter experts :) \u2014  +++$+++ :::Sometimes I do some serious content editing; sometimes I create a few new pages; other times I'm tired after a day at work, and just do a bit of gentle search-and-replace editing. It also depends whether the subject is something I'm into. I did a quick search/replace scan through some pages you've been working on, but there was not much to change. As for content, your articles aren't really my area of expertise, so I'll leave that to subject-matter experts :) — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
17290 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17286 +++$+++ 17289 +++$+++ 2010-03-30 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.269981300E09 +++$+++ Okay. I'm no expert beyond reading the articles, and I'm not really good enough with the information to do much. I [[Wikipedia:Splitting|split]] some content and I'm not really sure what to leave in each place, but one article was getting too wordy. +++$+++ ::::Okay. I'm no expert beyond reading the articles, and I'm not really good enough with the information to do much. I [[Wikipedia:Splitting|split]] some content and I'm not really sure what to leave in each place, but one article was getting too wordy.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 13:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

279431 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-26 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.138314960E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul, happy to see you back :-) I wanted to know if you could help me with a problem I have with an anonymous Indian editor (his IP are many, [[User:192.94.94.105]], [[User:192.94.94.106]], [[User:192.91.75.29]], [[User:192.91.75.30]], but I'm pretty sure he's the same guy), regarding the battle of the Hydaspes River, which he insists in imposing a version that Alexander lost, a thing that no scholar accepts, and has expanded this not only to [[Battle of the Hydaspes River]], but also to [[Porus]], [[Purushottama]] and [[Alexander the Great]] (in the latter case he seems to have given up). What I find particularly frustrating is that they're exactly the same arguments taken from exactly the same webpage, [http:\/\/sify.com\/itihaas\/fullstory.php?id=13225593 Alexander the Ordinary]. This has already been twice discussed at [[Alexander the Great]] and rejected by all non-indian editors, as can be seen at [[Talk:Alexander the Great#Conquest of India?]] and [[Talk:Alexander the Great#Disputed Indian History]]. An Indian editor, [[User:Idleguy]], also tried to block this anon. editor, but he too had little luck. I've tried speaking with him at [[Talk:Porus]], but it has been of absolutely no use. What should I do? And sorry for nagging you again; you must be feeling I'm becoming, as they say where I live, ''una tassa'', i.e. \"a tax\" ;-)  +++$+++ Hi Paul, happy to see you back :-) I wanted to know if you could help me with a problem I have with an anonymous Indian editor (his IP are many, [[User:192.94.94.105]], [[User:192.94.94.106]], [[User:192.91.75.29]], [[User:192.91.75.30]], but I'm pretty sure he's the same guy), regarding the battle of the Hydaspes River, which he insists in imposing a version that Alexander lost, a thing that no scholar accepts, and has expanded this not only to [[Battle of the Hydaspes River]], but also to [[Porus]], [[Purushottama]] and [[Alexander the Great]] (in the latter case he seems to have given up). What I find particularly frustrating is that they're exactly the same arguments taken from exactly the same webpage, [http://sify.com/itihaas/fullstory.php?id=13225593 Alexander the Ordinary]. This has already been twice discussed at [[Alexander the Great]] and rejected by all non-indian editors, as can be seen at [[Talk:Alexander the Great#Conquest of India?]] and [[Talk:Alexander the Great#Disputed Indian History]]. An Indian editor, [[User:Idleguy]], also tried to block this anon. editor, but he too had little luck. I've tried speaking with him at [[Talk:Porus]], but it has been of absolutely no use. What should I do? And sorry for nagging you again; you must be feeling I'm becoming, as they say where I live, ''una tassa'', i.e. "a tax" ;-) [[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 14:36, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
279432 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279431 +++$+++ 279431 +++$+++ 2006-01-27 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.138349100E09 +++$+++ Hi Aldux. Sorry you are having problems. I've looked into the situation a little, and I agree that those IP's are all apparently being used by a single editor, pushing a particular POV. I'm not sure I have any magic solutions for you. I think the best thing to do is to try to involve as many other editors as you can in the dispute (see: [[Wikipedia:Resolving disputes]], [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts]], and [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]]). For example you might consider asking [[User:Wetman|Wetman]]'s help. I've added those pages to my watchlist, and I will monitor the situation, and I will see what other assistance I can provide. In the mean time continue to do what you are doing, and try not to loose your patience and  continue to be as polite and considerate as possible. (P.S. No you are not \"a tax\", I'd rather think of it as performing my duty as your ''patronus'' ;-)  +++$+++ :Hi Aldux. Sorry you are having problems. I've looked into the situation a little, and I agree that those IP's are all apparently being used by a single editor, pushing a particular POV. I'm not sure I have any magic solutions for you. I think the best thing to do is to try to involve as many other editors as you can in the dispute (see: [[Wikipedia:Resolving disputes]], [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts]], and [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]]). For example you might consider asking [[User:Wetman|Wetman]]'s help. I've added those pages to my watchlist, and I will monitor the situation, and I will see what other assistance I can provide. In the mean time continue to do what you are doing, and try not to loose your patience and  continue to be as polite and considerate as possible. (P.S. No you are not "a tax", I'd rather think of it as performing my duty as your ''patronus'' ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
279433 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279431 +++$+++ 279431 +++$+++ 2006-01-27 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.138408620E09 +++$+++ I've replied at [[User talk:192.91.75.30]].  +++$+++ :I've replied at [[User talk:192.91.75.30]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
279434 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279431 +++$+++ 279431 +++$+++ 2006-01-27 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.138409580E09 +++$+++ Well would you like to try to explain the reason? I can't think of any disadvantage myself. I be interested to know any. In any case could you sign your posts with four tildes: <nowiki> \"~~~~\"<\/nowiki>.  +++$+++ :Well would you like to try to explain the reason? I can't think of any disadvantage myself. I be interested to know any. In any case could you sign your posts with four tildes: <nowiki> "~~~~"</nowiki>. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
279435 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279431 +++$+++ 279431 +++$+++ 2006-01-28 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.138439160E09 +++$+++ I would also be interested why the person 192.94.94.106 contributing from ti.com (Texas Instruments I guess) can't make an account. You get more anonymity with an account, not less, if that's the concern. Just pick a silly name, and will make life easier for you, and most importantly, for everybody else. :)  +++$+++ : I would also be interested why the person 192.94.94.106 contributing from ti.com (Texas Instruments I guess) can't make an account. You get more anonymity with an account, not less, if that's the concern. Just pick a silly name, and will make life easier for you, and most importantly, for everybody else. :) [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 01:06, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
279436 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279431 +++$+++ 279435 +++$+++ 2006-01-29 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.138583580E09 +++$+++ No, let us not avoid the issue of the account. You show up sporadically, each time with a different IP address, and don't even know how to sign your posts. You should make an account, and be a well-behaved Wikipedia citizen. Then it will be easier for us to talk to you, and your comments would get more weight as well.  +++$+++ :: No, let us not avoid the issue of the account. You show up sporadically, each time with a different IP address, and don't even know how to sign your posts. You should make an account, and be a well-behaved Wikipedia citizen. Then it will be easier for us to talk to you, and your comments would get more weight as well. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 17:13, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
279437 +++$+++ 192.94.94.105 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279431 +++$+++ 279436 +++$+++ 2006-01-30 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.138633200E09 +++$+++ The fact I am engaging in a debate with Paul is a sign of my being a good wiki citizen.  Debate the issue at hand where Aldux only wants a certain POV, glorifying Alexander, mentioned here.  Everything else is being swept away...  +++$+++ ::: The fact I am engaging in a debate with Paul is a sign of my being a good wiki citizen.  Debate the issue at hand where Aldux only wants a certain POV, glorifying Alexander, mentioned here.  Everything else is being swept away... [[User:192.94.94.105|192.94.94.105]] 07:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
279438 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279431 +++$+++ 279437 +++$+++ 2006-01-30 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.138660260E09 +++$+++ 192.9x.xx.xxx  (or how shall I adress you?), thanks for being willing to discuss this, (and thanks for signing). I think, however we should move the discussion to a more appropriate talk page. So I am going to copy your comment about Alexander above to [[Talk:Alexander the Great]], and continue the discussion there.  +++$+++ :::: 192.9x.xx.xxx  (or how shall I adress you?), thanks for being willing to discuss this, (and thanks for signing). I think, however we should move the discussion to a more appropriate talk page. So I am going to copy your comment about Alexander above to [[Talk:Alexander the Great]], and continue the discussion there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

541576 +++$+++  +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.187582280E09 +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, [[:Abascantus]], may not conform to some of Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|guidelines]] for new articles, so it will shortly be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|removed]] (if it hasn't been already). Please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for any tests you may want to do and please read our [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction page]] to learn more about contributing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-create1 --> [[User:Nenyedi|<span style=\"color:green\">'''Nen'''<\/span>]] +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, [[:Abascantus]], may not conform to some of Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|guidelines]] for new articles, so it will shortly be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|removed]] (if it hasn't been already). Please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for any tests you may want to do and please read our [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction page]] to learn more about contributing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-create1 --> [[User:Nenyedi|<span style="color:green">'''Nen'''</span>]][[User:Nenyedi|<span style="color:orange">'''yedi'''</span>]] • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/Nenyedi|Deeds]]•[[:User talk:Nenyedi|Talk]])</sup> 20:58, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
541577 +++$+++  +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541576 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.187582640E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your notice, I assumed that the content on the other website was copyrighted. Happy editing! [[User:Nenyedi|<span style=\"color:green\">'''Nen'''<\/span>]] +++$+++ ::Thank you for your notice, I assumed that the content on the other website was copyrighted. Happy editing! [[User:Nenyedi|<span style="color:green">'''Nen'''</span>]][[User:Nenyedi|<span style="color:orange">'''yedi'''</span>]] • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/Nenyedi|Deeds]]•[[:User talk:Nenyedi|Talk]])</sup> 21:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

533047 +++$+++ Lamarcus +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533047 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-02 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.201958460E09 +++$+++ You really shouldn't have deleted the article for Los Angeles-based rock band [[Blackblack]]. You claim that it doesn't meet criteria for notability as outlined in [[WP:MUSIC]], but Blackblack contains a member of another notable group ([[Alex Greenwald]] of [[Phantom Planet]]). Also, they have been written about in several notable publications, including a very positive review on the website Paper Thin Walls. Therefore, you had no right to delete the page, and I request that you put it back up. - +++$+++ You really shouldn't have deleted the article for Los Angeles-based rock band [[Blackblack]]. You claim that it doesn't meet criteria for notability as outlined in [[WP:MUSIC]], but Blackblack contains a member of another notable group ([[Alex Greenwald]] of [[Phantom Planet]]). Also, they have been written about in several notable publications, including a very positive review on the website Paper Thin Walls. Therefore, you had no right to delete the page, and I request that you put it back up. -[[User:Lamarcus|Lamarcus]] ([[User talk:Lamarcus|talk]]) 05:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
533048 +++$+++ Lamarcus +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533047 +++$+++ 533047 +++$+++ 2008-02-03 09:06:00 +++$+++ 1.202058360E09 +++$+++ Not to mention the fact that you didn't even discuss a possible deletion in the talk page, but you just outright deleted it. Gee, you seem to be getting a lot of complaints like this. - +++$+++ : Not to mention the fact that you didn't even discuss a possible deletion in the talk page, but you just outright deleted it. Gee, you seem to be getting a lot of complaints like this. -[[User:Lamarcus|Lamarcus]] ([[User talk:Lamarcus|talk]]) 09:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
533049 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533047 +++$+++ 533048 +++$+++ 2008-02-03 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.202067720E09 +++$+++ The article was deleted in prod process because an editor expressed a doubt about the notability of the subject. I am restoring it but I am putting it to afd to generate a clear consensus. Regards. --''' +++$+++ :: The article was deleted in prod process because an editor expressed a doubt about the notability of the subject. I am restoring it but I am putting it to afd to generate a clear consensus. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 11:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

541578 +++$+++ 72.143.255.51 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.187584500E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:72.143.255.51|72.143.255.51]] 21:35, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
541579 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541578 +++$+++ 541578 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.187584680E09 +++$+++ Stop being coy.  The links you put in all of those articles only introduces the text \"Spiderman invented mosh\" into the article, and conceals it by having the vandalism appear as a regular interwikimedia link.   +++$+++ :Stop being coy.  The links you put in all of those articles only introduces the text "Spiderman invented mosh" into the article, and conceals it by having the vandalism appear as a regular interwikimedia link.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 21:38, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
541580 +++$+++ 72.143.255.51 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541578 +++$+++ 541579 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.187584920E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:72.143.255.51|72.143.255.51]] 21:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
541581 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541578 +++$+++ 541580 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.187584980E09 +++$+++ Look at the Diffs of the edits you made.   +++$+++ :::Look at the Diffs of the edits you made.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 21:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
541582 +++$+++ 72.143.255.51 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541578 +++$+++ 541581 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.187585400E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::::--[[User:72.143.255.51|72.143.255.51]] 21:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

17291 +++$+++ LouisPhilippeCharles +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-27 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.269736260E09 +++$+++ Hey, saw you sorted out some of my mistakes on \xc9lisabeth Th\xe9r\xe8se's article! Thank you very much lol i dont always see everything! Would you do it again as I just added some more info! Merci, ''Monsieur le Duc''  +++$+++ Hey, saw you sorted out some of my mistakes on Élisabeth Thérèse's article! Thank you very much lol i dont always see everything! Would you do it again as I just added some more info! Merci, ''Monsieur le Duc'' [[User:LouisPhilippeCharles|LouisPhilippeCharles]] ([[User talk:LouisPhilippeCharles|talk]]) 17:31, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
17292 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17291 +++$+++ 17291 +++$+++ 2010-03-27 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.269747600E09 +++$+++ Nice to hear from you. I looked again, but only found one thing to amend. -- +++$+++ :Nice to hear from you. I looked again, but only found one thing to amend. --[[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

541583 +++$+++ Irishguy +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.187585580E09 +++$+++ An anonymous user [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3AMDP&diff=152309475&oldid=149544752 altered the template] which is why the gibberish was showing up. It has been reverted. <font color=\"Green\"> +++$+++ An anonymous user [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AMDP&diff=152309475&oldid=149544752 altered the template] which is why the gibberish was showing up. It has been reverted. <font color="Green">[[User:Irishguy|'''IrishGuy''']]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">[[User talk:Irishguy|''talk'']]</font></sup> 21:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
541584 +++$+++ 72.143.255.51 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541583 +++$+++ 541583 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.187585700E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:72.143.255.51|72.143.255.51]] 21:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
541585 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541583 +++$+++ 541584 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.187585940E09 +++$+++ I put it on my watchlist, so I'll be keeping an eye on it from now on.   +++$+++ ::I put it on my watchlist, so I'll be keeping an eye on it from now on.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 21:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
541586 +++$+++ 72.143.255.51 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541583 +++$+++ 541585 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.187586180E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:72.143.255.51|72.143.255.51]] 22:03, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
541587 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541583 +++$+++ 541586 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.187586660E09 +++$+++ Already done.  Honestly, the syntax you were using is just fine.  It's the template itself that someone messed with.  Apparently you were making perfectly okay edits.  I'm the dickhead that tarred and feathered you for nothing.   +++$+++ ::::Already done.  Honestly, the syntax you were using is just fine.  It's the template itself that someone messed with.  Apparently you were making perfectly okay edits.  I'm the dickhead that tarred and feathered you for nothing.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 22:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
541588 +++$+++ 72.143.255.51 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541583 +++$+++ 541587 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.187587200E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::::--[[User:72.143.255.51|72.143.255.51]] 22:20, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

279440 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279440 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-02 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.138929720E09 +++$+++ My wife, bless her soul, presented me with my very own barnstar. On a recent trip to Kansas, she found it at an antique store, and bought it for me. Isn't she sweet?  +++$+++ My wife, bless her soul, presented me with my very own barnstar. On a recent trip to Kansas, she found it at an antique store, and bought it for me. Isn't she sweet? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
279441 +++$+++ Mindspillage +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279440 +++$+++ 279440 +++$+++ 2006-02-02 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.138933800E09 +++$+++ Awww. :-)  +++$+++ :Awww. :-) [[User:Mindspillage|Mindspillage]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill yours?)]] 18:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
279442 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279440 +++$+++ 279440 +++$+++ 2006-02-09 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.139521680E09 +++$+++ You're welcome, glad to be of service ;-)  +++$+++ :You're welcome, glad to be of service ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:48, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

90264 +++$+++ Berean Hunter +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-19 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.287542100E09 +++$+++ {{outdent}} (interjection) At the moment, I'm ambivalent and watching the debate at the PUMP and here but I would like to request ceasing the removal until some form of community decision may be made for harmony's sake. At the present, it can be confusing for editors. Somewhere a consensus should be reached so that everyone can get on the same page and we're not all reverting one another owing to the confusion. Let's get it clarified first....I've seen this come up several times but have never seen a clear consensus. Either way, thank you for considering my request.<br> +++$+++ {{outdent}} (interjection) At the moment, I'm ambivalent and watching the debate at the PUMP and here but I would like to request ceasing the removal until some form of community decision may be made for harmony's sake. At the present, it can be confusing for editors. Somewhere a consensus should be reached so that everyone can get on the same page and we're not all reverting one another owing to the confusion. Let's get it clarified first....I've seen this come up several times but have never seen a clear consensus. Either way, thank you for considering my request.<br>[[User:Berean Hunter|<font face="High Tower Text" size="2px"><b style="color:#00C">⋙–Ber</b><b style="color:#66f">ean–Hun</b><b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b></font>]] ([[User talk:Berean Hunter|<b style="color:#00C">(⊕)</b>]]) 19:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
90265 +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90264 +++$+++ 90264 +++$+++ 2010-10-19 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.287543180E09 +++$+++ I have not removed any links since this thread started. I'm all for a discussion that hopefully will reach a consensus one way or another eventually. The thing is that the current discussion seems to be dying already, and I can't force people to make further comments. -- +++$+++ :I have not removed any links since this thread started. I'm all for a discussion that hopefully will reach a consensus one way or another eventually. The thing is that the current discussion seems to be dying already, and I can't force people to make further comments. --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 19:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
90266 +++$+++ Berean Hunter +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90264 +++$+++ 90265 +++$+++ 2010-10-19 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.287545160E09 +++$+++ Have you tried [[WP:RFC]] so more eyes will see it? Posting at [[WP:MILHIST]] would also help since it is probably the single largest project....also [[WP:NRHP]].<br> +++$+++ ::Have you tried [[WP:RFC]] so more eyes will see it? Posting at [[WP:MILHIST]] would also help since it is probably the single largest project....also [[WP:NRHP]].<br>[[User:Berean Hunter|<font face="High Tower Text" size="2px"><b style="color:#00C">⋙–Ber</b><b style="color:#66f">ean–Hun</b><b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b></font>]] ([[User talk:Berean Hunter|<b style="color:#00C">(⊕)</b>]]) 20:26, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
90267 +++$+++ Kumioko +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90264 +++$+++ 90266 +++$+++ 2010-10-19 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.287545520E09 +++$+++ Just FYI Myself or Xeno posted it at Wikiproject Biography, Wikiproject Find a Grave, WP:EL and its at the Pump. I agree that we should submit it for RFC. It comes up about every six months or so though and after long conversations like these it always comes back as keep or no consensus. I have seen it at least 4 times over the last couple years. -- +++$+++ :::Just FYI Myself or Xeno posted it at Wikiproject Biography, Wikiproject Find a Grave, WP:EL and its at the Pump. I agree that we should submit it for RFC. It comes up about every six months or so though and after long conversations like these it always comes back as keep or no consensus. I have seen it at least 4 times over the last couple years. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 20:32, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
90268 +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90264 +++$+++ 90267 +++$+++ 2010-10-19 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.287546600E09 +++$+++ I would support an RFC, as long as a neutral third party would close it after a certain period and decide on the consensus. -- +++$+++ ::::I would support an RFC, as long as a neutral third party would close it after a certain period and decide on the consensus. --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 20:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
90269 +++$+++ Berean Hunter +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90264 +++$+++ 90268 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.287622500E09 +++$+++ You need to write it...<br> +++$+++ :::::You need to write it...<br>[[User:Berean Hunter|<font face="High Tower Text" size="2px"><b style="color:#00C">⋙–Ber</b><b style="color:#66f">ean–Hun</b><b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b></font>]] ([[User talk:Berean Hunter|<b style="color:#00C">(⊕)</b>]]) 17:55, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
90270 +++$+++ Berean Hunter +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90264 +++$+++ 90269 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.287634260E09 +++$+++ Fwiw, posted on talk pages of [[WP:MILHIST]] and [[WP:NRHP]] to help.:)<br> +++$+++ ::::::Fwiw, posted on talk pages of [[WP:MILHIST]] and [[WP:NRHP]] to help.:)<br>[[User:Berean Hunter|<font face="High Tower Text" size="2px"><b style="color:#00C">⋙–Ber</b><b style="color:#66f">ean–Hun</b><b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b></font>]] ([[User talk:Berean Hunter|<b style="color:#00C">(⊕)</b>]]) 21:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
90271 +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ Conti +++$+++ 90264 +++$+++ 90270 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.287634380E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I'm somewhat busy currently, and simply don't have the time to start a full RFC. Might get to it next week. But as long as the discussion is kept alive, everything's good. -- +++$+++ :::::::Thanks! I'm somewhat busy currently, and simply don't have the time to start a full RFC. Might get to it next week. But as long as the discussion is kept alive, everything's good. --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 21:13, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

17299 +++$+++ Vchimpanzee +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17299 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-14 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.271294160E09 +++$+++ Do these need fixing? Thanks. +++$+++ Do these need fixing? Thanks.[[User:Vchimpanzee|<font color="Green">Vchimpanzee</font>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[User talk:Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: orange"> talk</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Vchimpanzee|<span style="color: purple">contributions</span>]]&nbsp;'''·''' 18:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
17300 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17299 +++$+++ 17299 +++$+++ 2010-04-15 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.271337180E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I left him a message and he responded below, so I have nbsped them again. \u2014  +++$+++ :Thanks. I left him a message and he responded below, so I have nbsped them again. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 06:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

17302 +++$+++ Sector001 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-03 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.272947400E09 +++$+++ Hey thanks for cleaning up my errors. I've done wiki pages for towns, schools, etc but Traylor is my first attempt at an actor, so I'm bound to make a few formatting screw-ups til I get the hang of it. Its still a work in progress, but I appreciate the help.  +++$+++ Hey thanks for cleaning up my errors. I've done wiki pages for towns, schools, etc but Traylor is my first attempt at an actor, so I'm bound to make a few formatting screw-ups til I get the hang of it. Its still a work in progress, but I appreciate the help. [[User:Sector001|Sector001]] ([[User talk:Sector001|talk]]) 21:30, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
17303 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17302 +++$+++ 17302 +++$+++ 2010-05-04 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.272977340E09 +++$+++ My pleasure. Thanks for your appreciation. Cheers \u2014  +++$+++ :My pleasure. Thanks for your appreciation. Cheers — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 05:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

541591 +++$+++ BillC +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-24 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.188015780E09 +++$+++ You made some fine edits to this short article. &mdash;  +++$+++ You made some fine edits to this short article. &mdash; [[User:BillC|BillC]]  <sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 21:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
541592 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541591 +++$+++ 541591 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.189217460E09 +++$+++ And at any rate, that would more properly be a debate at the Abradatas article, not the Cyropaedia one.   +++$+++ :And at any rate, that would more properly be a debate at the Abradatas article, not the Cyropaedia one.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 19:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

17304 +++$+++ JamesDouch +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-18 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.274191080E09 +++$+++ Anyway, thanks for creating the page for me. -- +++$+++ Anyway, thanks for creating the page for me. --[[User:JamesDouch|JamesDouch]] ([[User talk:JamesDouch|talk]]) 06:58, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
17305 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17304 +++$+++ 17304 +++$+++ 2010-05-18 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.274204280E09 +++$+++ I wondered if you might like to look at [[List_of_butterflies_of_India_(Satyrinae)#Ypthima_-_The_Rings]] and possibly update that with any others of the 309 that are appropriate. \u2014  +++$+++ :I wondered if you might like to look at [[List_of_butterflies_of_India_(Satyrinae)#Ypthima_-_The_Rings]] and possibly update that with any others of the 309 that are appropriate. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 10:38, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
17306 +++$+++ JamesDouch +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17304 +++$+++ 17305 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.274274180E09 +++$+++ I realized [[Ypthima]], is only a disambig. page. What needs to be done is create a the actual article for the genus, where is lists all the species. I can do that because for the genus page I don't need to know where they live. Even that will take a while, 309 species is pretty large for just 1 genus. So what I plan to do is create the article under the title of \"Ypthima (genus)\" and then list that in the disambig. page you created. From there every link to \"Ypthima\" (assuming it's about the butterfly) will have to be changed to \"Ypthima (genus)\". Now I just need to do it. -- +++$+++ ::I realized [[Ypthima]], is only a disambig. page. What needs to be done is create a the actual article for the genus, where is lists all the species. I can do that because for the genus page I don't need to know where they live. Even that will take a while, 309 species is pretty large for just 1 genus. So what I plan to do is create the article under the title of "Ypthima (genus)" and then list that in the disambig. page you created. From there every link to "Ypthima" (assuming it's about the butterfly) will have to be changed to "Ypthima (genus)". Now I just need to do it. --[[User:JamesDouch|JamesDouch]] ([[User talk:JamesDouch|talk]]) 06:03, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

279449 +++$+++ 87.122.1.157 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279449 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-15 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.140069720E09 +++$+++ Re [[Sexual intercourse]]. I find it rather unhelpful of you to revert my edits without comment. It's against policy and not helpful in this case, where  I made sensible changes that should at least be discussed. My most elaborate compliments,  +++$+++ Re [[Sexual intercourse]]. I find it rather unhelpful of you to revert my edits without comment. It's against policy and not helpful in this case, where  I made sensible changes that should at least be discussed. My most elaborate compliments, [[User:87.122.1.157|87.122.1.157]] 22:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
279450 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279449 +++$+++ 279449 +++$+++ 2006-02-15 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.140071040E09 +++$+++ I reverted your edit by mistake. I'm sorry for the error. I was on \"vandalism patrol\" where I was using an admin tool (which unfortunately automatically supplies the edit summary). When on patrol, I review hundreds of edits for vandalism, making dozens of reversions, at the rate of a few seconds per review, usually without error, but alas mistakes are sometimes made. Again I'm sorry for my error. I'm glad you caught it.  +++$+++ :I reverted your edit by mistake. I'm sorry for the error. I was on "vandalism patrol" where I was using an admin tool (which unfortunately automatically supplies the edit summary). When on patrol, I review hundreds of edits for vandalism, making dozens of reversions, at the rate of a few seconds per review, usually without error, but alas mistakes are sometimes made. Again I'm sorry for my error. I'm glad you caught it. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

279451 +++$+++ 87.122.15.55 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279451 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-16 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.140100620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your apologies, and keep the good work.  +++$+++ Thanks for your apologies, and keep the good work. [[User:87.122.15.55|87.122.15.55]] 06:37, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
279452 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279451 +++$+++ 279451 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.140127440E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome.  +++$+++ :You're very welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

279453 +++$+++ Matveiko +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279453 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-16 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.140093360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Matveiko|Matveiko]] 04:36, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
279454 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279453 +++$+++ 279453 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.140095700E09 +++$+++ Hi Matveiko, I've undeleted the article, and for now I have removed the speedy delete tag, since I am no longer convinced that it qualifies as a [[WP:CSD|speedy delete]]. Be advised that the editor that nominated this for speedy deletion may very well disagree and renominate it for speedy deletion, or send it to [[WP:AfD]].  +++$+++ :Hi Matveiko, I've undeleted the article, and for now I have removed the speedy delete tag, since I am no longer convinced that it qualifies as a [[WP:CSD|speedy delete]]. Be advised that the editor that nominated this for speedy deletion may very well disagree and renominate it for speedy deletion, or send it to [[WP:AfD]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
279455 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279453 +++$+++ 279454 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.140128940E09 +++$+++ Another admin [[User:FCYTravis|FCYTravis]] has now deleted the article.  +++$+++ ::Another admin [[User:FCYTravis|FCYTravis]] has now deleted the article. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:29, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

593686 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ El C +++$+++ 593686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-18 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.224336720E09 +++$+++ Hiya, just a note to say I haven't noticed you around lately. Hope everything's OK and that you haven't gone for good. Warm wishes to you and the chipmunks. <strong style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ Hiya, just a note to say I haven't noticed you around lately. Hope everything's OK and that you haven't gone for good. Warm wishes to you and the chipmunks. <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:WJBscribe|WJBscribe]] [[User talk:WJBscribe|(talk)]]</strong> 06:32, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
593687 +++$+++ El_C +++$+++ El C +++$+++ 593686 +++$+++ 593686 +++$+++ 2008-11-03 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.225740420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the kind note! Myself and small greatly appreciate it!  +++$+++ :Thanks for the kind note! Myself and small greatly appreciate it! [[User:El_C|El_C]] 11:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

265029 +++$+++ Jamesd1 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265029 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-01 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.191279600E09 +++$+++ I've posted a major update to the biography.  It contains new sections and a reorganizing of headings and subheadings in way that more closely approximates AAB's life and work.  It is throughly referenced and with some new references throughout, together with quotes and paraphrases that closely matches the citations.  It includes many new details and documentation on her life and conflict with the Theosophical.  Kind Regards to all.   +++$+++ I've posted a major update to the biography.  It contains new sections and a reorganizing of headings and subheadings in way that more closely approximates AAB's life and work.  It is throughly referenced and with some new references throughout, together with quotes and paraphrases that closely matches the citations.  It includes many new details and documentation on her life and conflict with the Theosophical.  Kind Regards to all.  [[User:Jamesd1|James]] 16:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
265030 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265029 +++$+++ 265029 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.191281460E09 +++$+++ At first reading I am very impressed . Good piece of work. Many thanks.   +++$+++ :At first reading I am very impressed . Good piece of work. Many thanks.  [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] 16:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

279457 +++$+++ Wetman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-16 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.140096000E09 +++$+++ I saw that Wikipedia had an overlapping article [[Homosexuality in the militaries of ancient Greece]] that was actually a sub-article, covering one section of the main article. In cases like this I edit down a pr\xe9cis of the more narrowly defined article and insert that into the broader one, with a ''Main article at...'' heading. The subsection can be as brief as you like, as long as it reflects the major points made in the full-size version. I figure you see the point in these moves. -- +++$+++ I saw that Wikipedia had an overlapping article [[Homosexuality in the militaries of ancient Greece]] that was actually a sub-article, covering one section of the main article. In cases like this I edit down a précis of the more narrowly defined article and insert that into the broader one, with a ''Main article at...'' heading. The subsection can be as brief as you like, as long as it reflects the major points made in the full-size version. I figure you see the point in these moves. --[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] 05:20, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
279458 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279457 +++$+++ 279457 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.140097200E09 +++$+++ Yes I do. And I completely agree with that kind of article architecture. In this case though It looked like your abridgment had inadvertently added some text that you didn't intend. I wasn't trying to make the subsection any more brief, just eliminate any accidental additions, and I wanted to make sure that I had done so correctly. Did you check my edit?  +++$+++ :Yes I do. And I completely agree with that kind of article architecture. In this case though It looked like your abridgment had inadvertently added some text that you didn't intend. I wasn't trying to make the subsection any more brief, just eliminate any accidental additions, and I wanted to make sure that I had done so correctly. Did you check my edit? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:40, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
279459 +++$+++ Wetman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279457 +++$+++ 279458 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.140097920E09 +++$+++ Oh yes. Quite right. I hadn't meant to drag all that in. -- +++$+++ ::Oh yes. Quite right. I hadn't meant to drag all that in. --[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] 05:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
279460 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279457 +++$+++ 279457 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.140098280E09 +++$+++ Good.  +++$+++ :Good. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

17316 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17316 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-18 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.276914300E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 19:25, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
17317 +++$+++ Aymatth2 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17316 +++$+++ 17316 +++$+++ 2010-06-18 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.276918740E09 +++$+++ I just got a similar bot message, for [[Florence Ita Giwa]], referring to a web source I can't even access! But the one on [[Kriszti\xe1n]] seems entirely reasonable to me. The [http:\/\/xn--krisztin-fza.com\/ webpage] contains \"Kriszti\xe1n ... Kriszti\xe1n ... Kriszti\xe1n\", and your article contains \"Kriszti\xe1n ... Kriszti\xe1n ... Kriszti\xe1n ... Kriszti\xe1n ... Kriszti\xe1n ... Kriszti\xe1n\". Clearly a multiple violation. :~)  +++$+++ :I just got a similar bot message, for [[Florence Ita Giwa]], referring to a web source I can't even access! But the one on [[Krisztián]] seems entirely reasonable to me. The [http://xn--krisztin-fza.com/ webpage] contains "Krisztián ... Krisztián ... Krisztián", and your article contains "Krisztián ... Krisztián ... Krisztián ... Krisztián ... Krisztián ... Krisztián". Clearly a multiple violation. :~) [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 20:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
17318 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17316 +++$+++ 17317 +++$+++ 2010-06-19 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.276954500E09 +++$+++ BTW I just read your userpage and totally agree with your \u201cstyle guidelines\u201d. It's also nice to meet someone else who enjoys contributing to articles on subjects they know nothing about. There's a great satisfaction in gathering, assessing and correlating information and then constructing a coherent little article, citing all the sources. \u2014  +++$+++ ::BTW I just read your userpage and totally agree with your “style guidelines”. It's also nice to meet someone else who enjoys contributing to articles on subjects they know nothing about. There's a great satisfaction in gathering, assessing and correlating information and then constructing a coherent little article, citing all the sources. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 06:35, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

550506 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550506 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-04 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.123198440E09 +++$+++ The problem isn't that you voted, but that the VfD was only two days old (in terms of its being placed at [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]]). -- +++$+++ The problem isn't that you voted, but that the VfD was only two days old (in terms of its being placed at [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]]). --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">&Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf;</font>)]] 16:34, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
550507 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550506 +++$+++ 550506 +++$+++ 2005-08-04 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.123200540E09 +++$+++ Sorry &mdash; I looked at the VfD logs for the date that the VfD was opened, plus two or three days later, but it didn't occur to me that there might be a gap of a fortnight... I'll go back and revert everything to your edits. -- +++$+++ :Sorry &mdash; I looked at the VfD logs for the date that the VfD was opened, plus two or three days later, but it didn't occur to me that there might be a gap of a fortnight... I'll go back and revert everything to your edits. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">&Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf;</font>)]] 17:09, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

279462 +++$+++ Geogre +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-20 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.140454380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the look at [[Henry Carey (writer)]].  I know that whoever tagged it meant well, and I responded by biting, but, dang it all, this place is going -project crazy, and folks slap tags as if that were an improvement.  Slapping a tag is inferior to a note on a talk page.  It is when that fails that tags should be used, but, there I was, editing that article about once a week, and suddenly I find that it needs to be cleaned up to meet a higher standard?  That was a bit off-putting, as that article is now the best source on the web for information on Carey.  It has more information in it than the ''DNB,'' and it's less POV than the ''DNB.''  It does a ''better'' job of integrating the music and satire careers than other sources (although I wish a musical person would research him; I suppose I'll look in the ''Grove Dictionary'' some time).  It's not that it's an acceptable article being told to improve to a \"higher standard,\" but rather that I thought it was a very good article already above the standards of this place, and, without a word of what the person thought needed to be done, a tag appears, and it's supposed to stay there for 30 days and only be removed by volunteers at this project?  It's breath taking.   +++$+++ Thanks for the look at [[Henry Carey (writer)]].  I know that whoever tagged it meant well, and I responded by biting, but, dang it all, this place is going -project crazy, and folks slap tags as if that were an improvement.  Slapping a tag is inferior to a note on a talk page.  It is when that fails that tags should be used, but, there I was, editing that article about once a week, and suddenly I find that it needs to be cleaned up to meet a higher standard?  That was a bit off-putting, as that article is now the best source on the web for information on Carey.  It has more information in it than the ''DNB,'' and it's less POV than the ''DNB.''  It does a ''better'' job of integrating the music and satire careers than other sources (although I wish a musical person would research him; I suppose I'll look in the ''Grove Dictionary'' some time).  It's not that it's an acceptable article being told to improve to a "higher standard," but rather that I thought it was a very good article already above the standards of this place, and, without a word of what the person thought needed to be done, a tag appears, and it's supposed to stay there for 30 days and only be removed by volunteers at this project?  It's breath taking.  [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 08:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
279463 +++$+++ Geogre +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279462 +++$+++ 279462 +++$+++ 2006-02-20 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.140461400E09 +++$+++ Now the person the article was \"assigned to\" has done some copy editing.  Most of the changes are good (one I think takes emphasis away and fails to carry the same force), but ''still'' not a word on the article's talk page.  Fear? Hubris? Ignorance of practice?  I don't mind the improvements, but being treated as an IP editor is a bit aggravating.   +++$+++ :Now the person the article was "assigned to" has done some copy editing.  Most of the changes are good (one I think takes emphasis away and fails to carry the same force), but ''still'' not a word on the article's talk page.  Fear? Hubris? Ignorance of practice?  I don't mind the improvements, but being treated as an IP editor is a bit aggravating.  [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 10:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
279464 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279462 +++$+++ 279463 +++$+++ 2006-02-20 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.140480960E09 +++$+++ \"Ton't mention it. Yes some folks just go around tagging things. From each according to his means, I guess. Writing an explanation on the talk page would require well, writing, not everyone's strong suit. It goes without saying that there are nearly a million other articles which could stand being cleaned up before any of \"yours\". But I guess any loving attention is a good thing. If we want to effect the culture of that project we should go over there and talk to them. I'm not sure I have the gumption at the moment however. I've also made a few tweaks to the last editor's copyediting. Please feel free to stomp on my toes with hob-nailed boots. I will defer to your better writing skills always.  +++$+++ ::"Ton't mention it. Yes some folks just go around tagging things. From each according to his means, I guess. Writing an explanation on the talk page would require well, writing, not everyone's strong suit. It goes without saying that there are nearly a million other articles which could stand being cleaned up before any of "yours". But I guess any loving attention is a good thing. If we want to effect the culture of that project we should go over there and talk to them. I'm not sure I have the gumption at the moment however. I've also made a few tweaks to the last editor's copyediting. Please feel free to stomp on my toes with hob-nailed boots. I will defer to your better writing skills always. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
279465 +++$+++ Geogre +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279462 +++$+++ 279462 +++$+++ 2006-02-20 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.140491520E09 +++$+++ You've been doing fantastic stuff, Paul.  I could feel abashed at how many mistakes I had left in, but I still take solace that there are no better sources.  If I could find an image of a loup on Commons, I'd give you the Hawk Eye Editor Award.  Fantastic catches.  (See, on my talk page: I'm going to do a conference paper on Carey, I think.  I've got to do a paper on ''someone,'' and I think he's a good candidate, given how few people know him.)   +++$+++ :You've been doing fantastic stuff, Paul.  I could feel abashed at how many mistakes I had left in, but I still take solace that there are no better sources.  If I could find an image of a loup on Commons, I'd give you the Hawk Eye Editor Award.  Fantastic catches.  (See, on my talk page: I'm going to do a conference paper on Carey, I think.  I've got to do a paper on ''someone,'' and I think he's a good candidate, given how few people know him.)  [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 19:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
279466 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279462 +++$+++ 279465 +++$+++ 2006-02-20 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.140493200E09 +++$+++ Il n'ya pas de quoi. I'm good at detail work, by disposition as well as training (mathematics and programming), however as a consequence I sometimes miss the bigger picture.  +++$+++ ::Il n'ya pas de quoi. I'm good at detail work, by disposition as well as training (mathematics and programming), however as a consequence I sometimes miss the bigger picture. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

17319 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17319 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-27 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.277685120E09 +++$+++ for your clean-up at [[Russ Savakus]].  I was surprised to discover that there was not even a stub on him, though a wikipedia search finds him all over the place.  I need to follow up on that. Then the \"No Source\" folks showed up (it is interesting {[[opinion]]{) that wikipedia will not accept its self as a source) and I scrounged around and found something, and then you showed up and now it's legit.  Life is good.  Einar aka  +++$+++ for your clean-up at [[Russ Savakus]].  I was surprised to discover that there was not even a stub on him, though a wikipedia search finds him all over the place.  I need to follow up on that. Then the "No Source" folks showed up (it is interesting {[[opinion]]{) that wikipedia will not accept its self as a source) and I scrounged around and found something, and then you showed up and now it's legit.  Life is good.  Einar aka [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] ([[User talk:Carptrash|talk]]) 17:32, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
17320 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17319 +++$+++ 17319 +++$+++ 2010-06-27 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.277686380E09 +++$+++ I just put in 9 more links to the [[Russ Savakus]] page from other articles on WP. Can you find a copyright-free image to go on the page? I haven't found one yet. I also looked on other language wikipedias, but he doesn't seem to have a page anywhere else we can link to. Cheers \u2014  +++$+++ :I just put in 9 more links to the [[Russ Savakus]] page from other articles on WP. Can you find a copyright-free image to go on the page? I haven't found one yet. I also looked on other language wikipedias, but he doesn't seem to have a page anywhere else we can link to. Cheers — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 17:53, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

17322 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17322 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-19 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.279598820E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your friendly and patient assistance with [[User:Shrik88music|a user in need of assistance]].  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your friendly and patient assistance with [[User:Shrik88music|a user in need of assistance]]. [[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 21:07, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
17323 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17322 +++$+++ 17322 +++$+++ 2010-07-19 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.279598820E09 +++$+++ I'm so glad to see you helping him out. :) -- +++$+++ :I'm so glad to see you helping him out. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 21:07, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
17324 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17322 +++$+++ 17323 +++$+++ 2010-07-19 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.279599420E09 +++$+++ That's really nice of you \u2013 thanks. \u2014  +++$+++ ::That's really nice of you – thanks. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 21:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
17325 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17322 +++$+++ 17322 +++$+++ 2010-07-17 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.279426500E09 +++$+++ I think it probably best if you tell the story in the article. I'm sure the plot is easier to understand for someone who has seen the film. \u2014  +++$+++ :I think it probably best if you tell the story in the article. I'm sure the plot is easier to understand for someone who has seen the film. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 21:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
17326 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17322 +++$+++ 17322 +++$+++ 2010-07-19 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.279596180E09 +++$+++ Hope that is some help. \u2014  +++$+++ :Hope that is some help. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:23, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

279467 +++$+++ Kcordina +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-20 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.140480360E09 +++$+++ Paul, thanks for your further edits of the [[Henry Carey (writer)]], mine were done in a rush and your corrections are all improvements.  As you suggested 'generations' was an accidental typo for 'generation'.  +++$+++ Paul, thanks for your further edits of the [[Henry Carey (writer)]], mine were done in a rush and your corrections are all improvements.  As you suggested 'generations' was an accidental typo for 'generation'. [[User:Kcordina|Kcordina]] 16:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
279468 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279467 +++$+++ 279467 +++$+++ 2006-02-20 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.140480960E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome, I'm glad you think they are improvements.  +++$+++ :You're very welcome, I'm glad you think they are improvements. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

279469 +++$+++ Fastfission +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279469 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-20 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.140500040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking a look at that. There are some additions made by you-know-who that I still need to review and probably revert (he is fond of inserting things into the article which are completely uncited and unverifiable, such as that Winterberg was involved in only \"purely scientific\" aspects of the LaRouche group, whatever that is supposed to mean) but I haven't had time to go over much. The work on the notes looks good; again, some of them got messed up because of you-know-who making modifications to the article (they were originally in the correct order). -- +++$+++ Thanks for taking a look at that. There are some additions made by you-know-who that I still need to review and probably revert (he is fond of inserting things into the article which are completely uncited and unverifiable, such as that Winterberg was involved in only "purely scientific" aspects of the LaRouche group, whatever that is supposed to mean) but I haven't had time to go over much. The work on the notes looks good; again, some of them got messed up because of you-know-who making modifications to the article (they were originally in the correct order). --[[User:Fastfission|Fastfission]] 21:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
279470 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279469 +++$+++ 279469 +++$+++ 2006-02-20 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.140500700E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome. I'm glad you like my additions. I'm planning to work on this article a bit more. This article helps to fill in background for the Einstein priority issues, and will help some in trying to evaluate the competing claims. Also I think our friend's contributions to this article have been more constructive, albeit with an agenda.  +++$+++ :You're very welcome. I'm glad you like my additions. I'm planning to work on this article a bit more. This article helps to fill in background for the Einstein priority issues, and will help some in trying to evaluate the competing claims. Also I think our friend's contributions to this article have been more constructive, albeit with an agenda. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
279471 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279469 +++$+++ 279469 +++$+++ 2006-02-22 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.140677880E09 +++$+++ Hi Mdinowtz, I think you have me mixed up with someone else. Looking at your recent contributions and based on your message above It looks like you are talking about the article [[Dhimmi]]. My only edit to that article was to revert a bit of vandalism. I think you may have meant your message for [[user:Pecher|Pecher]]. Regards  +++$+++ :Hi Mdinowtz, I think you have me mixed up with someone else. Looking at your recent contributions and based on your message above It looks like you are talking about the article [[Dhimmi]]. My only edit to that article was to revert a bit of vandalism. I think you may have meant your message for [[user:Pecher|Pecher]]. Regards [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:58, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
279472 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279469 +++$+++ 279469 +++$+++ 2006-02-23 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.140689280E09 +++$+++ No problem.  +++$+++ :No problem. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:08, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

17328 +++$+++ David Eppstein +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-04 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.280927220E09 +++$+++ I undid [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tetrahedron&action=historysubmit&diff=377069205&oldid=377024471 your recent change] to [[Tetrahedron]]. The special characters for superscripts and fractions should not be used in math articles; see [[WP:MOSMATH]]. The main reason for this is that they have an inconsistent appearance to the formatting for other superscripts and fractions that do not have special characters. \u2014 +++$+++ I undid [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tetrahedron&action=historysubmit&diff=377069205&oldid=377024471 your recent change] to [[Tetrahedron]]. The special characters for superscripts and fractions should not be used in math articles; see [[WP:MOSMATH]]. The main reason for this is that they have an inconsistent appearance to the formatting for other superscripts and fractions that do not have special characters. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 06:07, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
17329 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17328 +++$+++ 17328 +++$+++ 2010-08-04 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.280947680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for correcting me. That was something I wasn't aware of, but I'll watch out for it in future and make sure I don't do it again. \u2014  +++$+++ :Thanks for correcting me. That was something I wasn't aware of, but I'll watch out for it in future and make sure I don't do it again. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 11:48, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

279473 +++$+++ Bunchofgrapes +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-23 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.140695100E09 +++$+++ I think you may owe {{User|209.161.238.90}} a quick apology - the material he was trying to delete appears to be silly nonsense. &mdash; +++$+++ I think you may owe {{User|209.161.238.90}} a quick apology - the material he was trying to delete appears to be silly nonsense. &mdash;[[User:Bunchofgrapes|Bunchofgrapes]]  ([[User talk:Bunchofgrapes|talk]]) 03:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
279474 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279473 +++$+++ 279473 +++$+++ 2006-02-23 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.140695580E09 +++$+++ Yes you're right. A bit of carelessness on my part. I've left her\/him a note. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Yes you're right. A bit of carelessness on my part. I've left her/him a note. Thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:53, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
279475 +++$+++ Bunchofgrapes +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279473 +++$+++ 279474 +++$+++ 2006-02-23 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.140695760E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Anybody could have made that mistake. &mdash; +++$+++ ::Thanks. Anybody could have made that mistake. &mdash;[[User:Bunchofgrapes|Bunchofgrapes]]  ([[User talk:Bunchofgrapes|talk]]) 03:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

17330 +++$+++ Antarctic-adventurer +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-07 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.281206280E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ Cheers, [[user:Antarctic-adventurer|<font color="#009966">Antarctic-adventurer</font>]][[user talk:Antarctic-adventurer|<font color="#009966"> (talk)</font>]] 11:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
17331 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17330 +++$+++ 17330 +++$+++ 2010-08-07 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.281225300E09 +++$+++ Nice to hear from you. It is suggested in [[WP:NBSP]] that the non-breaking space should be used to prevent things like ''4&nbsp;mm'' or ''25&nbsp;kg'' or ''2&nbsp;am'' from being split over two lines. I replace them using the [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser|AutoWikiBrowser]] tool. I know it makes the text less readable when you're editing it, but it does help readability when people read the articles in whatever size of browser window they choose to use. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Nice to hear from you. It is suggested in [[WP:NBSP]] that the non-breaking space should be used to prevent things like ''4&nbsp;mm'' or ''25&nbsp;kg'' or ''2&nbsp;am'' from being split over two lines. I replace them using the [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser|AutoWikiBrowser]] tool. I know it makes the text less readable when you're editing it, but it does help readability when people read the articles in whatever size of browser window they choose to use. Cheers, [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 16:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
17332 +++$+++ Antarctic-adventurer +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17330 +++$+++ 17331 +++$+++ 2010-08-09 08:16:00 +++$+++ 1.281366960E09 +++$+++ OK thanks for your explanation. I will adopt this procedure too. Best  +++$+++ ::OK thanks for your explanation. I will adopt this procedure too. Best [[user:Antarctic-adventurer|<font color="#009966">Antarctic-adventurer</font>]][[user talk:Antarctic-adventurer|<font color="#009966"> (talk)</font>]] 08:16, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

541620 +++$+++ Canadian Paul +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-31 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.199092260E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed that you requested a speedy deletion of the above article. There has been many a deletion discussion regarding this issue, and it has been determined that all Olympic athletes are notable enough to receive their own article, whether or not they were medal winners, per the clause in [[WP:BIO]] of athletes who competed at the top level in their field. I don't agree with it myself, but unfortunately that's the way things go with notability. Anyhow, I have (grudgingly) undone the deletion and thought I would leave you a note. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi, I noticed that you requested a speedy deletion of the above article. There has been many a deletion discussion regarding this issue, and it has been determined that all Olympic athletes are notable enough to receive their own article, whether or not they were medal winners, per the clause in [[WP:BIO]] of athletes who competed at the top level in their field. I don't agree with it myself, but unfortunately that's the way things go with notability. Anyhow, I have (grudgingly) undone the deletion and thought I would leave you a note. Cheers, [[User:Canadian Paul|CP]] 01:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
541621 +++$+++ Canadian Paul +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541620 +++$+++ 541620 +++$+++ 2007-12-31 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.199092800E09 +++$+++ It's not terrible in theory. [[Hiroshi Yoshizawa|In practice]], however... Cheers,  +++$+++ :It's not terrible in theory. [[Hiroshi Yoshizawa|In practice]], however... Cheers, [[User:Canadian Paul|CP]] 01:20, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

279477 +++$+++ C S +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-06 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.141670040E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul.  I've nominated this article for deletion.  I see from its history that you may have reasons to believe he is notable.  I invite you to join the [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Nicolas_Courtois|discussion]].  -- +++$+++ Hi Paul.  I've nominated this article for deletion.  I see from its history that you may have reasons to believe he is notable.  I invite you to join the [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nicolas_Courtois|discussion]].  --[[User:C S|C S]][[User talk:C S| (Talk)]] 10:34, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
279478 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279477 +++$+++ 279477 +++$+++ 2006-03-06 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.141691820E09 +++$+++ Thanks Chan!  +++$+++ :Thanks Chan! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:37, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

17334 +++$+++ Phoenixrod +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-12 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.284352740E09 +++$+++ I think there's been a mistake with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Don_S._Wenger&diff=prev&oldid=384458494 this] edit. Changing \"practiced\" to \"practised\" is neither a minor edit nor a cleanup. I see on your user page that you prefer British English, which is the norm for British articles, but the American spelling \"practiced\" should be preferred here. I don't know if you are using AWB for other such changes, but please be careful to respect [[WP:ENGVAR]] and not change American articles to British spellings without consensus. - +++$+++ I think there's been a mistake with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Don_S._Wenger&diff=prev&oldid=384458494 this] edit. Changing "practiced" to "practised" is neither a minor edit nor a cleanup. I see on your user page that you prefer British English, which is the norm for British articles, but the American spelling "practiced" should be preferred here. I don't know if you are using AWB for other such changes, but please be careful to respect [[WP:ENGVAR]] and not change American articles to British spellings without consensus. -[[User:Phoenixrod|Phoenixrod]] ([[User talk:Phoenixrod|talk]]) 21:39, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
17335 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17334 +++$+++ 17334 +++$+++ 2010-09-13 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.284380880E09 +++$+++ I'm surprised. I had no idea that Americans had different rules for practice\/practise. Do you also have different rules for advice\/advise and device\/devise? What is the American spelling rule? Here in UK, the noun forms are advice\/device\/practice and the verbs are advise\/devise\/practise. Thanks for contacting me. I look forward to your reply. \u2014  +++$+++ :I'm surprised. I had no idea that Americans had different rules for practice/practise. Do you also have different rules for advice/advise and device/devise? What is the American spelling rule? Here in UK, the noun forms are advice/device/practice and the verbs are advise/devise/practise. Thanks for contacting me. I look forward to your reply. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 05:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
17336 +++$+++ Phoenixrod +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17334 +++$+++ 17335 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.284459540E09 +++$+++ There's certainly a consistent logic to the parallel cases you cite in the UK spelling. Advice\/device\/practice are the same noun forms here, too, and advise\/devise are the verbs. But there is no \"practise\" in American spelling; it's always \"practice\" for all parts of speech. I'm sure it looks quite strange to you. I have no idea ''why'' it doesn't follow the pattern of advise\/devise in the US, but that's language for you. - +++$+++ ::There's certainly a consistent logic to the parallel cases you cite in the UK spelling. Advice/device/practice are the same noun forms here, too, and advise/devise are the verbs. But there is no "practise" in American spelling; it's always "practice" for all parts of speech. I'm sure it looks quite strange to you. I have no idea ''why'' it doesn't follow the pattern of advise/devise in the US, but that's language for you. -[[User:Phoenixrod|Phoenixrod]] ([[User talk:Phoenixrod|talk]]) 03:19, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
17337 +++$+++ Phoenixrod +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17334 +++$+++ 17335 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.284459780E09 +++$+++ Here's a throwaway thought: Maybe it has something to do with the pronunciations, since practice\/practise ends with an \"iss\" sound rather than \"eyes\", so despite the spelling similarity to advise\/devise, it's not a true parallel. - +++$+++ ::Here's a throwaway thought: Maybe it has something to do with the pronunciations, since practice/practise ends with an "iss" sound rather than "eyes", so despite the spelling similarity to advise/devise, it's not a true parallel. -[[User:Phoenixrod|Phoenixrod]] ([[User talk:Phoenixrod|talk]]) 03:23, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
17338 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17334 +++$+++ 17337 +++$+++ 2010-09-14 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.284467580E09 +++$+++ Phonetic spelling? In English? Now there\u2019s a novel idea\u2026 ;) Seriously though, thanks for spotting and reverting this one, and for explaining. \u2014  +++$+++ :::Phonetic spelling? In English? Now there’s a novel idea… ;) Seriously though, thanks for spotting and reverting this one, and for explaining. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 05:33, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

279481 +++$+++ E4mmacro +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279481 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-10 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.142004300E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul, Licorne has quoted Folsing (on the Hilbert page) for a claim that in 1915 Einstein went to Hilbert for help because Einstein couldn't derive the correct field equations. This appears on the Einstein-Action page as well (unsourced). Other sources, including Folsing himself, say that Hilbert invivted Einstein to Gottingin in June-July 1915 for one week of lectures on general relativity. It was Hilbert who went to Einstein, looking for a physics problem to solve. Licorne probably doesn't have a copy of Folsing (he couldn't tell the page number where Folsing says Einstein went to Hilbert for help). Can you sort it out, with your trusty copy of Folsing? Also, good to know is whether Folsing is aware of the printer's proofs of Hilbert's paper. He seems to make no reference to them and therefore makes some mistakes, as far as I can see. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Paul, Licorne has quoted Folsing (on the Hilbert page) for a claim that in 1915 Einstein went to Hilbert for help because Einstein couldn't derive the correct field equations. This appears on the Einstein-Action page as well (unsourced). Other sources, including Folsing himself, say that Hilbert invivted Einstein to Gottingin in June-July 1915 for one week of lectures on general relativity. It was Hilbert who went to Einstein, looking for a physics problem to solve. Licorne probably doesn't have a copy of Folsing (he couldn't tell the page number where Folsing says Einstein went to Hilbert for help). Can you sort it out, with your trusty copy of Folsing? Also, good to know is whether Folsing is aware of the printer's proofs of Hilbert's paper. He seems to make no reference to them and therefore makes some mistakes, as far as I can see. Thanks. [[User:E4mmacro|E4mmacro]] 07:25, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
279482 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279481 +++$+++ 279481 +++$+++ 2006-03-10 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.142038080E09 +++$+++ Hi Michael, I'll see what I can find.  +++$+++ :Hi Michael, I'll see what I can find. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
279483 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279481 +++$+++ 279481 +++$+++ 2006-03-10 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.142043180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

541626 +++$+++ ExRat +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-04 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.199444040E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the help on the article on Mahmoud Asgari and Ayaz Marhoni. However, your edit was again reverted by [[User:LGBTRights123]]. I have never been involved in any sort of conflict, and I am not sure how to go about contacting an administrator. I have left a message on this user's talk page, yet he\/she continues to revert and insert quotes from his very own source ([http:\/\/www.thenation.com\/doc\/20050815\/kim ''The Nation'') that are complete fabrications from what the actual article states. He has broken the the 3 revert rule and I would like to explain all of this to an administartor. Can you help me with this? I am not sure how to. Thank you.  +++$+++ Thank you for the help on the article on Mahmoud Asgari and Ayaz Marhoni. However, your edit was again reverted by [[User:LGBTRights123]]. I have never been involved in any sort of conflict, and I am not sure how to go about contacting an administrator. I have left a message on this user's talk page, yet he/she continues to revert and insert quotes from his very own source ([http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050815/kim ''The Nation'') that are complete fabrications from what the actual article states. He has broken the the 3 revert rule and I would like to explain all of this to an administartor. Can you help me with this? I am not sure how to. Thank you. [[User:ExRat|ExRat]] ([[User talk:ExRat|talk]]) 02:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
541627 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541626 +++$+++ 541626 +++$+++ 2008-01-04 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.199496480E09 +++$+++ 4 reverts leads to a 3RR block. You're still within the limit if you revert LGBTRights123's edits. <span style=\"background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;\"> +++$+++ :4 reverts leads to a 3RR block. You're still within the limit if you revert LGBTRights123's edits. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span> 17:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

17339 +++$+++ Bruinfan12 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-16 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.284648120E09 +++$+++ cheers, +++$+++ cheers,[[User:Bruinfan12|Bruinfan12]] ([[User talk:Bruinfan12|talk]]) 07:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
17340 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17339 +++$+++ 17339 +++$+++ 2010-09-16 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.284651360E09 +++$+++ My pleasure :) \u2014  +++$+++ :My pleasure :) — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 08:36, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

279484 +++$+++ Aaron Brenneman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-11 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.142147400E09 +++$+++ Oi vey.  A mess.  Good idea, your relabeling\/moving.  I was trying to be even handed, but with competing versions of \"even handed\" going... I think that I've quoted wp:own about four times in this arbitration. -  +++$+++ Oi vey.  A mess.  Good idea, your relabeling/moving.  I was trying to be even handed, but with competing versions of "even handed" going... I think that I've quoted wp:own about four times in this arbitration. - [[User:Aaron Brenneman|<font color="#000000">brenneman</font>]][[User Talk:Aaron Brenneman|<font color="#000000"><sup>{T}</sup></font>]]<span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Aaron+Brenneman<font color="000000" title="Admin actions"><sup>'''{L}''' </sup></font>]</span> 23:10, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
279485 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279484 +++$+++ 279484 +++$+++ 2006-03-11 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.142148420E09 +++$+++ It did seem like things were getting a bit out of hand. I'm glad you approve.  +++$+++ :It did seem like things were getting a bit out of hand. I'm glad you approve. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:27, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

17343 +++$+++ Shrik88music +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-28 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.285711140E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shrik88music|Shrik88music]] ([[User talk:Shrik88music|talk]]) 14:59, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
17344 +++$+++ E. Ripley +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17343 +++$+++ 17343 +++$+++ 2010-09-28 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.285712580E09 +++$+++ Responding here to the message Shrik88music left on my talk page, because I'm not sure he would see it there:  Thanks for the message.  On a cursory glance, this edit looks better than the one that was posted to the [[WP:RSN|reliable sources noticeboard]], though some of the wording could use some work.  I don't know anything about your questions 1-5 as I am not following the editing on the article; I'm sorry I can't be of assistance with that.  One final point, please try not to discuss other contributors in a demeaning way; saying Active Banana is collaborating with you \"out of fear\" is insulting and unfair.  &mdash;  +++$+++ :Responding here to the message Shrik88music left on my talk page, because I'm not sure he would see it there:  Thanks for the message.  On a cursory glance, this edit looks better than the one that was posted to the [[WP:RSN|reliable sources noticeboard]], though some of the wording could use some work.  I don't know anything about your questions 1-5 as I am not following the editing on the article; I'm sorry I can't be of assistance with that.  One final point, please try not to discuss other contributors in a demeaning way; saying Active Banana is collaborating with you "out of fear" is insulting and unfair.  &mdash; [[User:E. Ripley|e. ripley]]\<sup>[[User talk:E. Ripley|talk]]</sup> 15:23, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

279488 +++$+++  +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-20 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.142862960E09 +++$+++ Well, we've done it. Have a look at [[User:Knowledge Seeker\/Encephalon nomination]]. We're just waiting for acceptance now.  +++$+++ Well, we've done it. Have a look at [[User:Knowledge Seeker/Encephalon nomination]]. We're just waiting for acceptance now. [[User:Titoxd|Tito]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:#008000;">xd</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Titoxd|?!?]] - [[Wikipedia:WikiProject edit counters/Flcelloguy's Tool|help us]])</sup> 05:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
279489 +++$+++ Knowledge Seeker +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279488 +++$+++ 279488 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.143041940E09 +++$+++ You may not be aware of this, but the rules for RFA were changed some time back; while one may create a nomination, it shouldn't be added to [[WP:RFA]] until the candidate accepts the nomination. In any case, Encephalon has previously declined nominations made without asking him first, and I preferred to give him time to answer the questions before posting the nomination on [[WP:RFA]]. &mdash;  +++$+++ :You may not be aware of this, but the rules for RFA were changed some time back; while one may create a nomination, it shouldn't be added to [[WP:RFA]] until the candidate accepts the nomination. In any case, Encephalon has previously declined nominations made without asking him first, and I preferred to give him time to answer the questions before posting the nomination on [[WP:RFA]]. &mdash; [[User:Knowledge Seeker|Knowledge Seeker]] [[User talk:Knowledge Seeker|&#2470;]] 07:39, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
279490 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279488 +++$+++ 279489 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.143065340E09 +++$+++ Ahh I see. Yes I was not quite up on current procedure. Well done!  +++$+++ ::Ahh I see. Yes I was not quite up on current procedure. Well done! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
279491 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279488 +++$+++ 279488 +++$+++ 2006-03-23 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.143104100E09 +++$+++ My pleasure. My support seems well deserved.  +++$+++ :My pleasure. My support seems well deserved. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

17345 +++$+++ Shipsview +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17345 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-22 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.287768720E09 +++$+++ I did not find a message from you on my Talk page.  +++$+++ I did not find a message from you on my Talk page. [[User:Shipsview|Shipsview]] ([[User talk:Shipsview|talk]]) 10:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
17346 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17345 +++$+++ 17345 +++$+++ 2010-10-23 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.287884940E09 +++$+++ My pleasure. An interesting little article. I've just added some categories too. Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia \u2014  +++$+++ :My pleasure. An interesting little article. I've just added some categories too. Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 18:49, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

17347 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ --Santiago84 11:45, 23 October 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ --Santiago84 11:45, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
17348 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17347 +++$+++ 17347 +++$+++ 2010-10-23 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.287886500E09 +++$+++ Happy to help. I've also put a few internal links into the article, and added a reference to the book you mentioned. Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia. \u2014  +++$+++ :Happy to help. I've also put a few internal links into the article, and added a reference to the book you mentioned. Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 19:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

279492 +++$+++ BenetD +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-22 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.143083040E09 +++$+++ Good call putting categories into the [[transition monoid]] entry. I'm not too sure about [[:Category:Computational models]], though; I'm not sure that viewing finite-state machines algebraically in this way is enough of a difference to qualify as a different model of computation. (Now, recognizability by a monoid is a separate issue, but I don't think anyone's written anything about that yet.)  +++$+++ Good call putting categories into the [[transition monoid]] entry. I'm not too sure about [[:Category:Computational models]], though; I'm not sure that viewing finite-state machines algebraically in this way is enough of a difference to qualify as a different model of computation. (Now, recognizability by a monoid is a separate issue, but I don't think anyone's written anything about that yet.) [[User:BenetD|BenetD]] 19:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
279493 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279492 +++$+++ 279492 +++$+++ 2006-03-22 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.143083700E09 +++$+++ Feel free to remove it. I don't really know much about this area. I  was just trying to find some appropritate categories.  +++$+++ :Feel free to remove it. I don't really know much about this area. I  was just trying to find some appropritate categories. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

17349 +++$+++ Sticks66 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17349 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-03 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.288814880E09 +++$+++ I've never been able to work out that trick to make a multi-used ref appear once in the Ref list with a, b, c etc. You just fixed it [[Arthur Justice|here]]. How do you do that ? -<small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ I've never been able to work out that trick to make a multi-used ref appear once in the Ref list with a, b, c etc. You just fixed it [[Arthur Justice|here]]. How do you do that ? -<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sticks66|<font style="color:black;background:white;">'''Sticks'''</font>]][[User talk:Sticks66|<font style="color:white;background:red;">'''66'''</font>]]</span></small> 13:08, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
17350 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17349 +++$+++ 17349 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.288815660E09 +++$+++ It\u2019s explained in [[WP:REFNAME]]. Give the first instance of the reference a ''name'' in the ref tag (as in <nowiki><ref name=foo>Reference text goes here<\/ref><\/nowiki>) then for all subsequent instances, just put the shortened form (in my example, you\u2019d just put <nowiki><ref name=foo \/><\/nowiki>) as the whole thing. Hope that helps :) \u2014  +++$+++ :It’s explained in [[WP:REFNAME]]. Give the first instance of the reference a ''name'' in the ref tag (as in <nowiki><ref name=foo>Reference text goes here</ref></nowiki>) then for all subsequent instances, just put the shortened form (in my example, you’d just put <nowiki><ref name=foo /></nowiki>) as the whole thing. Hope that helps :) — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 13:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

279494 +++$+++ John Reid +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-28 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.143617460E09 +++$+++ Please restore the article to the correct title. Please do ''not'' wait for some majority opinion to form. I would not respect any number of \"votes\" setting \u03c0 = 3.  +++$+++ Please restore the article to the correct title. Please do ''not'' wait for some majority opinion to form. I would not respect any number of "votes" setting π = 3. [[User:John Reid|John Reid]] 23:31, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
279495 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279494 +++$+++ 279494 +++$+++ 2006-03-29 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.143620640E09 +++$+++ On a personal note, I'm concerned that I have caused you to become upset. In any case I have thrown a monkey wrench into much of your work. For all this I am sorry. And as I said on your talk page I am happy to redo or undo any edits which become necessary once this issue is settled. I apologize for any trouble this is causing you.   +++$+++ :On a personal note, I'm concerned that I have caused you to become upset. In any case I have thrown a monkey wrench into much of your work. For all this I am sorry. And as I said on your talk page I am happy to redo or undo any edits which become necessary once this issue is settled. I apologize for any trouble this is causing you.  [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

17351 +++$+++ Shrik88music +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.289952360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Shrik88music|Shrik88music]] ([[User talk:Shrik88music|talk]]) 16:06, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
17352 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17351 +++$+++ 17351 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.289973000E09 +++$+++ When I read \"inserting a column\" I expected there would already be a table there, and you wanted one extra column. I have examined the page to which you refer: [[M. G. Ramachandran]] and there is no table of films. Your request is unclear. \u2013  +++$+++ :When I read "inserting a column" I expected there would already be a table there, and you wanted one extra column. I have examined the page to which you refer: [[M. G. Ramachandran]] and there is no table of films. Your request is unclear. – [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 21:50, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

279496 +++$+++ John Reid +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-29 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.143628860E09 +++$+++ Should you prevail, please do not omit to rewrite all 125 articles to conform.  +++$+++ Should you prevail, please do not omit to rewrite all 125 articles to conform. [[User:John Reid|John Reid]] 02:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
279497 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279496 +++$+++ 279496 +++$+++ 2006-03-29 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.143638700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:25, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

17353 +++$+++ Shrik88music +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-18 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.290138360E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/M._G._Ramachandran_filmography see the link again....insert the actress coloumn ..names of the actress ii have given u from 1963-1978 u may incorporate them too +++$+++ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._G._Ramachandran_filmography see the link again....insert the actress coloumn ..names of the actress ii have given u from 1963-1978 u may incorporate them too[[User:Shrik88music|Shrik88music]] ([[User talk:Shrik88music|talk]]) 19:46, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
17354 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17353 +++$+++ 17353 +++$+++ 2010-11-17 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.290064500E09 +++$+++ I resent your behaviour. You changed the link in your original message <u>after<\/u> I had replied to it \u2013 this makes my reply seem ridiculous, and makes it appear that I didn't read your question properly. If you had simply replied \"my mistake, I meant to type http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/M._G._Ramachandran_filmography\" I would have respected you for it. But to try to cover up your mistake, implying that I made the error, is despicable. I'm sorry but I cannot work with behaviour like this. When you find someone else who will add the extra column for you, please don't deal with them as you have with me. \u2014  +++$+++ :I resent your behaviour. You changed the link in your original message <u>after</u> I had replied to it – this makes my reply seem ridiculous, and makes it appear that I didn't read your question properly. If you had simply replied "my mistake, I meant to type http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._G._Ramachandran_filmography" I would have respected you for it. But to try to cover up your mistake, implying that I made the error, is despicable. I'm sorry but I cannot work with behaviour like this. When you find someone else who will add the extra column for you, please don't deal with them as you have with me. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 23:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

279498 +++$+++ John Reid +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-29 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.143701880E09 +++$+++ I'll ask again: Please return the article to what is ''now'' its canonical title, as shown in every other article in the project. Seek consensus for some other change, if you like. Or '''be bold''' and fix all these pages to suit yourself.  +++$+++ I'll ask again: Please return the article to what is ''now'' its canonical title, as shown in every other article in the project. Seek consensus for some other change, if you like. Or '''be bold''' and fix all these pages to suit yourself. [[User:John Reid|John Reid]] 22:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
279499 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279498 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-29 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.143702240E09 +++$+++ John, with due respect, you are being unnecessarily harsh in your comments. As you said, each of us have their own views on how the article should be called. The matter is being discussed, and I suggest you wait a bit, and don't take things as close to heart. As far as \"fixing\" those pages to point to whatever article name is decided, it can be easily done with a bot, so please don't stress so much on that in your arguments.  +++$+++ :: John, with due respect, you are being unnecessarily harsh in your comments. As you said, each of us have their own views on how the article should be called. The matter is being discussed, and I suggest you wait a bit, and don't take things as close to heart. As far as "fixing" those pages to point to whatever article name is decided, it can be easily done with a bot, so please don't stress so much on that in your arguments. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 23:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
279500 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279498 +++$+++ 279498 +++$+++ 2006-03-30 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.143708300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:45, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
279501 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279498 +++$+++ 279498 +++$+++ 2006-03-30 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.143708360E09 +++$+++ P.S. (''having just read Oleg's comment'') I agree, no need to \"stress\" ;-) it will all workout for the best eventually.  +++$+++ :P.S. (''having just read Oleg's comment'') I agree, no need to "stress" ;-) it will all workout for the best eventually. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

541643 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-05 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.209974160E09 +++$+++ <big><big><big>http:\/\/lists.wikimedia.org\/pipermail\/wikien-l\/2006-May\/046733.html<\/big><\/big><\/big> ''' +++$+++ <big><big><big>http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046733.html</big></big></big> '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 00:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
541644 +++$+++ The Highest Tide +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541643 +++$+++ 541643 +++$+++ 2008-05-05 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.209974280E09 +++$+++ Be careful he's an admin...oh wait, be careful he has rollback...oh wait. Actually don't listen to him at all.  +++$+++ :Be careful he's an admin...oh wait, be careful he has rollback...oh wait. Actually don't listen to him at all. [[User:The Highest Tide|The Highest Tide]] ([[User talk:The Highest Tide|talk]]) 00:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
541645 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541643 +++$+++ 541644 +++$+++ 2008-05-05 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.209975120E09 +++$+++ Fine. Let the trolls win. ''' +++$+++ ::Fine. Let the trolls win. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 01:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

17356 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-19 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.290230700E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" |Super work with your dabbing efforts. They are more important for the encyclopedia than many often give credit for. And you work so smoothly and efficiently and consistentally. Keep up the great work!\u2666  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" |Super work with your dabbing efforts. They are more important for the encyclopedia than many often give credit for. And you work so smoothly and efficiently and consistentally. Keep up the great work!♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 21:25, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
17357 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17356 +++$+++ 17356 +++$+++ 2010-11-21 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.290399960E09 +++$+++ Thanks \u2013 really nice of you. I didn't even know this dabstar existed! \u2013 +++$+++ :Thanks – really nice of you. I didn't even know this dabstar existed! –[[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:26, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

614562 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614562 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-07 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.157628240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for looking after my user page. --  +++$+++ Thanks for looking after my user page. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 04:24, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
614563 +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614562 +++$+++ 614562 +++$+++ 2006-09-07 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.157629500E09 +++$+++ You're welcome, it's all in a day's work. I remembered to up the vandalism counter too. -- +++$+++ :You're welcome, it's all in a day's work. I remembered to up the vandalism counter too. --[[User:Daniel Olsen|Daniel Olsen]] 04:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

17358 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-21 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.290383880E09 +++$+++ Hi. What's the chances of you being able to help with dabbing for Burmese settlements. Check out [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Burma (Myanmar)\/Township templates]] and  +++$+++ Hi. What's the chances of you being able to help with dabbing for Burmese settlements. Check out [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Burma (Myanmar)/Township templates]] and [[User:Dr. Blofeld/Burma#Repeated places names]].. I've got a lot of dabbing to do!.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 15:58, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
17359 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17358 +++$+++ 17358 +++$+++ 2010-11-21 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.290400680E09 +++$+++ But as far as I can see, there is only one [[Ywathit]] page for me to link to. Where are the other 54? Do I create pages for each of the other places called Ywathit? If so, where is the source data from which to create these 54 pages? Sorry, but I'm missing something. \u2014  +++$+++ :But as far as I can see, there is only one [[Ywathit]] page for me to link to. Where are the other 54? Do I create pages for each of the other places called Ywathit? If so, where is the source data from which to create these 54 pages? Sorry, but I'm missing something. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:38, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

279503 +++$+++ John Reid +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-31 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.143805800E09 +++$+++ Obviously, that's how I think it should be done in order to present an image of competency, reliability, and professionalism. Self-consistency is a superficial but surprisingly reliable way to determine the authority and accuracy of a source; it never fails to amaze me how many cranks and fools cannot keep their terms straight. I hope ''we'' may distinguish ourselves.  +++$+++ Obviously, that's how I think it should be done in order to present an image of competency, reliability, and professionalism. Self-consistency is a superficial but surprisingly reliable way to determine the authority and accuracy of a source; it never fails to amaze me how many cranks and fools cannot keep their terms straight. I hope ''we'' may distinguish ourselves. [[User:John Reid|John Reid]] 03:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
279504 +++$+++ John Reid +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279503 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-05 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.144285020E09 +++$+++ ''A '''foolish''' consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.'' (emphasis mine)  +++$+++ :: ''A '''foolish''' consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.'' (emphasis mine) [[User:John Reid|John Reid]] 17:57, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
279505 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279503 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-05 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.144285440E09 +++$+++ Indeed.  +++$+++ :::Indeed. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

17360 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-21 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.290405900E09 +++$+++ you'll see it linked 55 within the various [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Burma (Myanmar)\/Township templates]]. The village lists were extracted from Maplandia which uses geonames database to compile them. If that is difficult, perhaps do a template at a time like [[Template:Indaw Township]] and ensure they are red linked? No you will not have to create 54 pages just one dab page for [[Ywathit]] with all of the settlements linked in. Village xxxx, Township e.g [[Ywathit, Homalin]] (without the township on the end) and if there are multiple in one township they go by coordinates which are alreayd linked I believe.  No worries if not, it would be a great help though for sure.\u2666  +++$+++ you'll see it linked 55 within the various [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Burma (Myanmar)/Township templates]]. The village lists were extracted from Maplandia which uses geonames database to compile them. If that is difficult, perhaps do a template at a time like [[Template:Indaw Township]] and ensure they are red linked? No you will not have to create 54 pages just one dab page for [[Ywathit]] with all of the settlements linked in. Village xxxx, Township e.g [[Ywathit, Homalin]] (without the township on the end) and if there are multiple in one township they go by coordinates which are alreayd linked I believe.  No worries if not, it would be a great help though for sure.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 22:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
17361 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17360 +++$+++ 17360 +++$+++ 2010-11-22 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.290438720E09 +++$+++ OK. So it\u2019s about creating dab pages full of redlinks. Where will the actual village pages come from? Is there a script to generate them from geonames? I'd rather create the village pages first, then create dab pages full of blue links\u2026 \u2014  +++$+++ :OK. So it’s about creating dab pages full of redlinks. Where will the actual village pages come from? Is there a script to generate them from geonames? I'd rather create the village pages first, then create dab pages full of blue links… — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 07:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
17362 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17360 +++$+++ 17360 +++$+++ 2010-11-23 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.290578220E09 +++$+++ I downloaded the entire database from geonames \u2013 looks a relatively straightforward task to write a few lines of code to generate village pages from that. Is somebody else doing that, or would you like me to have a go when I get time? Life is pretty busy till after Dec 1, but I could look into making a start on it after that\u2026 I just don't want to spend time on it if somebody else already has the task in hand. \u2014  +++$+++ :I downloaded the entire database from geonames – looks a relatively straightforward task to write a few lines of code to generate village pages from that. Is somebody else doing that, or would you like me to have a go when I get time? Life is pretty busy till after Dec 1, but I could look into making a start on it after that… I just don't want to spend time on it if somebody else already has the task in hand. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 21:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

46584 +++$+++ NAHID +++$+++ Uucp +++$+++ 46584 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-04 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.170606840E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. [[User:NAHID|NAHID]] 08:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
46585 +++$+++ Uucp +++$+++ Uucp +++$+++ 46584 +++$+++ 46584 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.170620160E09 +++$+++ Logo use is claimed, not generic fair use.  +++$+++ : Logo use is claimed, not generic fair use. [[User:Uucp|Uucp]] 12:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

279507 +++$+++ Wikiklrsc +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-29 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.143691800E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. Thanks for your kind reply. Yes, styles vary. Hmm. No problem with \"Notes\" v. \"Footnotes\". I'll have to come up with some older pages which I haven't edited with bulleted footnotes if I can as examples. I guess since the ref\/note mechanism and the current encouraged mechanism (ref, \/ref, reference\/) by Wikipedia all seem to indent since they use numbered lists rather than the rf\/ent mechanism. So that's where I think I remember seeing indentation first: the ref\/note mechanism where people used numbered lists -- which indent. Don't know ultimately which is more visually useful. Thanks for your thoughts. Time for reflection. ;) BTW, is the new non-template mechanism as documented on [[Wikipedia:Footnotes]] considered a standard for Wikipedia use? Or just a recommendation? As you correctly say, styles vary widely within Wikipedia articles. Thanks again and Bests. --- (Bob)  +++$+++ Hi Paul. Thanks for your kind reply. Yes, styles vary. Hmm. No problem with "Notes" v. "Footnotes". I'll have to come up with some older pages which I haven't edited with bulleted footnotes if I can as examples. I guess since the ref/note mechanism and the current encouraged mechanism (ref, /ref, reference/) by Wikipedia all seem to indent since they use numbered lists rather than the rf/ent mechanism. So that's where I think I remember seeing indentation first: the ref/note mechanism where people used numbered lists -- which indent. Don't know ultimately which is more visually useful. Thanks for your thoughts. Time for reflection. ;) BTW, is the new non-template mechanism as documented on [[Wikipedia:Footnotes]] considered a standard for Wikipedia use? Or just a recommendation? As you correctly say, styles vary widely within Wikipedia articles. Thanks again and Bests. --- (Bob) [[User:Wikiklrsc|Wikiklrsc]] 20:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
279508 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279507 +++$+++ 279507 +++$+++ 2006-03-29 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.143693840E09 +++$+++ Well I haven't been following the discussions and developments all that much. I need to reread [[WP:CITE]]. and [[WP:FN]], But I would say that there are definitely no firm standards yet. ''Many'' folks prefer in-line Harvard style citations over footnotes used just for citations. As for footnoting styles, the non-template system is gaining steam. But my personal preference is for rf\/ent since I think that system looks \"best\" (I really ''hate'' those up arrow thingies ;-) and (aside from having to manually number) is more convenient. But each to his own ;-)  +++$+++ :Well I haven't been following the discussions and developments all that much. I need to reread [[WP:CITE]]. and [[WP:FN]], But I would say that there are definitely no firm standards yet. ''Many'' folks prefer in-line Harvard style citations over footnotes used just for citations. As for footnoting styles, the non-template system is gaining steam. But my personal preference is for rf/ent since I think that system looks "best" (I really ''hate'' those up arrow thingies ;-) and (aside from having to manually number) is more convenient. But each to his own ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

17364 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-25 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.290726840E09 +++$+++ Can you create a dab page at [[Aage]]? It could also be compiled from Norwegian wiki which has missing \"Aages\".\u2666  +++$+++ Can you create a dab page at [[Aage]]? It could also be compiled from Norwegian wiki which has missing "Aages".♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 15:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
17365 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17364 +++$+++ 17364 +++$+++ 2010-11-25 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.290728580E09 +++$+++ I've put one at [[Aage]] \u2013 a bit of a rushed job (got deadlines in real life at present) but it\u2019s a start. Rgds \u2014  +++$+++ :I've put one at [[Aage]] – a bit of a rushed job (got deadlines in real life at present) but it’s a start. Rgds — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 15:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

279509 +++$+++ Wikiklrsc +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279509 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-29 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.143694920E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Paul. I agree with what you've said. I do also find the up arrow thingees a bit odd. I have a hard time stuffing a long footnote in the article proper as well. It seems to disturb the raw editing process, although it comes out properly in the seen final article. Indeed, thanks for your thoughts as ever. --- (Bob)  +++$+++ Thanks, Paul. I agree with what you've said. I do also find the up arrow thingees a bit odd. I have a hard time stuffing a long footnote in the article proper as well. It seems to disturb the raw editing process, although it comes out properly in the seen final article. Indeed, thanks for your thoughts as ever. --- (Bob) [[User:Wikiklrsc|Wikiklrsc]] 21:02, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
279510 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279509 +++$+++ 279509 +++$+++ 2006-03-29 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.143696300E09 +++$+++ My pleasure ;-)  +++$+++ :My pleasure ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:25, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
279511 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279509 +++$+++ 279509 +++$+++ 2006-04-03 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.144121640E09 +++$+++ I don't hate him. What is your source that he is dead? In any case, I'm sorry but your \"Rest in peace\" message, is inappropriate &mdash; it is not encyclopedic.  +++$+++ :I don't hate him. What is your source that he is dead? In any case, I'm sorry but your "Rest in peace" message, is inappropriate &mdash; it is not encyclopedic. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:34, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

17367 +++$+++ Lom Konkreta +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-16 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.292547780E09 +++$+++ There was no encyclopedic content in these pages. And there is no potential for article: all what is related to the origins of these names is better to keep in the \"parent\" page. Listing people by first name is silly. See [[John (name)]], [[Peter (name)]]. At the same time, it is reasonable to list people known only by their name, see e.g. [[Michael]], i.e., when disambiguation is required.  +++$+++ There was no encyclopedic content in these pages. And there is no potential for article: all what is related to the origins of these names is better to keep in the "parent" page. Listing people by first name is silly. See [[John (name)]], [[Peter (name)]]. At the same time, it is reasonable to list people known only by their name, see e.g. [[Michael]], i.e., when disambiguation is required. [[User:Lom Konkreta|Lom Konkreta]] ([[User talk:Lom Konkreta|talk]]) 17:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
17368 +++$+++ Lom Konkreta +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17367 +++$+++ 17367 +++$+++ 2010-12-16 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.292548020E09 +++$+++ P.S. As I see you've got a disambiguation barnstar. Congrats. ... So you guess I didn't have to educate you in guidelines about disambiguation (and [[WP:NOT]] about arbitrarily listing various superficially related stuff, such as [[List of people named after saints]] :-).  +++$+++ :P.S. As I see you've got a disambiguation barnstar. Congrats. ... So you guess I didn't have to educate you in guidelines about disambiguation (and [[WP:NOT]] about arbitrarily listing various superficially related stuff, such as [[List of people named after saints]] :-). [[User:Lom Konkreta|Lom Konkreta]] ([[User talk:Lom Konkreta|talk]]) 17:07, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
17369 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17367 +++$+++ 17368 +++$+++ 2010-12-16 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.292562060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply. The <nowiki>{{given name}}<\/nowiki> template (see [[:Template:Given name\/doc]]) exists specifically for pages such as those you deleted, and puts such pages into the [[:Category:Given names]], which contains over 4500 similar pages. It is part of [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthroponymy]]. These are not disambiguation pages and do not claim to be (unlike the ''hndis'' pages, which <u>are<\/i> disambiguation pages). Whatever your opinions of them (and even if you think they are \u201csilly\u201d) they are an established and respected part of Wikipedia. In view of this, I\u2019m restoring the pages and linking them to the [[Gabriel]] page in the normally accepted fashion. Please feel free to discuss further if you disagree with my action after familiarising yourself with the ''Given names'' category and its application. Best regards, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia \u2014  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your reply. The <nowiki>{{given name}}</nowiki> template (see [[:Template:Given name/doc]]) exists specifically for pages such as those you deleted, and puts such pages into the [[:Category:Given names]], which contains over 4500 similar pages. It is part of [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthroponymy]]. These are not disambiguation pages and do not claim to be (unlike the ''hndis'' pages, which <u>are</i> disambiguation pages). Whatever your opinions of them (and even if you think they are “silly”) they are an established and respected part of Wikipedia. In view of this, I’m restoring the pages and linking them to the [[Gabriel]] page in the normally accepted fashion. Please feel free to discuss further if you disagree with my action after familiarising yourself with the ''Given names'' category and its application. Best regards, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 21:01, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
17370 +++$+++ Lom Konkreta +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17367 +++$+++ 17369 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.292927040E09 +++$+++ Please allow me to disregard your exceedingly polite speech, which I see in stark contrast with your quite impolite actions of reverting my edits without finishing the discussion. I see no harm in such pages, only non-encyclopedic nuisance, therefore I will not continue this discussion with a person who appear to respect only their own opinion. Good luck in further b-star accumulation.  +++$+++ :::Please allow me to disregard your exceedingly polite speech, which I see in stark contrast with your quite impolite actions of reverting my edits without finishing the discussion. I see no harm in such pages, only non-encyclopedic nuisance, therefore I will not continue this discussion with a person who appear to respect only their own opinion. Good luck in further b-star accumulation. [[User:Lom Konkreta|Lom Konkreta]] ([[User talk:Lom Konkreta|talk]]) 02:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
17371 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17367 +++$+++ 17370 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.292996460E09 +++$+++ Sorry, Lom \u2013 I didn't mean to act impolitely. Let's rewind a bit \u2026 here's how it went: I created two pages; you removed their content; I reinstated it, explaining my rationale for doing so \u2013 I really didn't intend to be impolite. I know your edits were in good faith, and I do appreciate the time and effort you're putting into Wikipedia. Sincere apologies for making you cross \u2013 I do my best to get on with other editors, but sometimes I don't quite get it right :( \u2013  +++$+++ ::::Sorry, Lom – I didn't mean to act impolitely. Let's rewind a bit … here's how it went: I created two pages; you removed their content; I reinstated it, explaining my rationale for doing so – I really didn't intend to be impolite. I know your edits were in good faith, and I do appreciate the time and effort you're putting into Wikipedia. Sincere apologies for making you cross – I do my best to get on with other editors, but sometimes I don't quite get it right :( – [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 21:41, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

279512 +++$+++ RussellMcKenzie +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279512 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-03 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.144121880E09 +++$+++ Can you block this user or 24 hours, or semi-protect the article? The Mr. T thing was an April Fools, just like this character.  +++$+++ Can you block this user or 24 hours, or semi-protect the article? The Mr. T thing was an April Fools, just like this character. [[User:RussellMcKenzie|Sparky]] 20:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
279513 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279512 +++$+++ 279512 +++$+++ 2006-04-03 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.144122480E09 +++$+++ I've blocked him for 24 hours for violation of 3RR.  +++$+++ :I've blocked him for 24 hours for violation of 3RR. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:48, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

352420 +++$+++ Cloudz679 +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ 352420 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.307917260E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you changed the start date as Sparta Prague manager on the Jozef Chovanec page to 2009. According to the references on his wikipedia page, he started in 2008. If you have a reliable reference which lists his start as 2009, please add it to the article. Otherwise please revert your edits. I am putting together a list of Czech league managers and information such as this will be very important, so I would like to be sure. <br\/>-Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi, I noticed you changed the start date as Sparta Prague manager on the Jozef Chovanec page to 2009. According to the references on his wikipedia page, he started in 2008. If you have a reliable reference which lists his start as 2009, please add it to the article. Otherwise please revert your edits. I am putting together a list of Czech league managers and information such as this will be very important, so I would like to be sure. <br/>-Thanks, [[User:Cloudz679|Cloudz679]] ([[User talk:Cloudz679|talk]]) 15:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
352421 +++$+++ Cloudz679 +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ 352420 +++$+++ 352420 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.308002880E09 +++$+++ According to that link, his start date is 7.10.2008. This ties in with the references already on his page. Do you have something that puts him starting at 2009?  +++$+++ :According to that link, his start date is 7.10.2008. This ties in with the references already on his page. Do you have something that puts him starting at 2009? [[User:Cloudz679|Cloudz679]] ([[User talk:Cloudz679|talk]]) 15:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
352422 +++$+++ Cloudz679 +++$+++ Darwinek +++$+++ 352420 +++$+++ 352421 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.308012000E09 +++$+++ I've taken action as discussed. Thanks for your input.  +++$+++ ::I've taken action as discussed. Thanks for your input. [[User:Cloudz679|Cloudz679]] ([[User talk:Cloudz679|talk]]) 17:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

279514 +++$+++ RussellMcKenzie +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279514 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-04 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.144198440E09 +++$+++ Good Job, thanks.  +++$+++ Good Job, thanks. [[User:RussellMcKenzie|Sparky]] 17:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
279515 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279514 +++$+++ 279514 +++$+++ 2006-04-04 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.144204440E09 +++$+++ You're welcome.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:34, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
279516 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279514 +++$+++ 279514 +++$+++ 2006-04-06 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.144367160E09 +++$+++ Hello, Mr Clark. In my opinion the link to your web site [http:\/\/humbugonline.blogspot.com] does not seem particularly useful. For obvious reasons, we try to limit links to web sites with commercial interests. For example we don't want people adding links as a way of advertising or promoting some product, or trying to generate hits for their web sites, to increase their ad revenue. I'm sure you understand.  +++$+++ :Hello, Mr Clark. In my opinion the link to your web site [http://humbugonline.blogspot.com] does not seem particularly useful. For obvious reasons, we try to limit links to web sites with commercial interests. For example we don't want people adding links as a way of advertising or promoting some product, or trying to generate hits for their web sites, to increase their ad revenue. I'm sure you understand. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

606700 +++$+++ Rettetast +++$+++ Fritz Saalfeld +++$+++ 606700 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-21 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.185081840E09 +++$+++ I have tagged [[:Image:Gorillaz_group.jpg]] as {{tl|no rationale}}, because it does not provide a [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|fair use rationale]].  If you believe the image to be acceptable for [[Wikipedia:fair use|fair use]] according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the [[Wikipedia:fair use rationale guideline|fair use rationale guideline]], on [[:Image:Gorillaz_group.jpg|the image description page]].  Please also consider using {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use]].  Thank you. <!-- Template:Missing rationale short -->  +++$+++ I have tagged [[:Image:Gorillaz_group.jpg]] as {{tl|no rationale}}, because it does not provide a [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|fair use rationale]].  If you believe the image to be acceptable for [[Wikipedia:fair use|fair use]] according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the [[Wikipedia:fair use rationale guideline|fair use rationale guideline]], on [[:Image:Gorillaz_group.jpg|the image description page]].  Please also consider using {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use]].  Thank you. <!-- Template:Missing rationale short --> [[User:Rettetast|Rette]][[User talk:Rettetast|tast]] 22:24, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
606701 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ Fritz Saalfeld +++$+++ 606700 +++$+++ 606700 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.185319740E09 +++$+++ Added fair use for Gorillaz, not others. -- +++$+++ : Added fair use for Gorillaz, not others. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

541660 +++$+++ Thevitogodfather +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-19 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.211191680E09 +++$+++ Jon is my brothers best friend and a close personal friend of mine. He committed suicide some time today and my brother found his body at his house between 6-7 P.M. eastern. I am very sad right and i would appreciate it if you allowed my edit to remain in his honor. +++$+++ Jon is my brothers best friend and a close personal friend of mine. He committed suicide some time today and my brother found his body at his house between 6-7 P.M. eastern. I am very sad right and i would appreciate it if you allowed my edit to remain in his honor.[[User:Thevitogodfather|Thevitogodfather]] ([[User talk:Thevitogodfather|talk]]) 03:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
541661 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541660 +++$+++ 541660 +++$+++ 2008-05-19 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.211195940E09 +++$+++ Replied on your talk page.   +++$+++ :Replied on your talk page.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 04:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
541662 +++$+++ Thevitogodfather +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541660 +++$+++ 541661 +++$+++ 2008-05-19 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.211234220E09 +++$+++ i have just one question. what happens if it is not reported in the news at all. is there anyway i can change it then? +++$+++ :: i have just one question. what happens if it is not reported in the news at all. is there anyway i can change it then?[[User:Thevitogodfather|Thevitogodfather]] ([[User talk:Thevitogodfather|talk]]) 14:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

17373 +++$+++ Torbenbrinker +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17373 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-29 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.293688500E09 +++$+++ I wrote two short articles on sights of my home town: [[St. Nicolai's Chapel, Hildesheim]] and [[St. Bernward's Church, Hildesheim]]. If you have time, please correct them. Thanks a lot.-- +++$+++ I wrote two short articles on sights of my home town: [[St. Nicolai's Chapel, Hildesheim]] and [[St. Bernward's Church, Hildesheim]]. If you have time, please correct them. Thanks a lot.--[[User:Torbenbrinker|Torbenbrinker]] ([[User talk:Torbenbrinker|talk]]) 21:55, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
17374 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17373 +++$+++ 17373 +++$+++ 2011-01-01 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.293904140E09 +++$+++ Nice to hear from you again. I've done as you requested; once again there was hardly anything to correct, but I made a few small adjustments. They are delightful and interesting articles, well written; and your English is better than many native British writers! It's a pleasure to work with you. \u2014  +++$+++ :Nice to hear from you again. I've done as you requested; once again there was hardly anything to correct, but I made a few small adjustments. They are delightful and interesting articles, well written; and your English is better than many native British writers! It's a pleasure to work with you. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 09:49, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

279519 +++$+++ Theo Clark +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279519 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-06 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.144370520E09 +++$+++ Thanks Paul, and I am genuinely motivated by the need for more \"critical thinkers\" out there (I'm a Science Teacher), which is what got me into fallacies in the 1st place.  +++$+++ Thanks Paul, and I am genuinely motivated by the need for more "critical thinkers" out there (I'm a Science Teacher), which is what got me into fallacies in the 1st place. [[User:Theo Clark|Theo Clark]] 17:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
279520 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279519 +++$+++ 279519 +++$+++ 2006-04-06 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.144371120E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Your desire to improve critical thinking is a noble one. There are lots of opportunities for that here ;-) I wish you all the best.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. Your desire to improve critical thinking is a noble one. There are lots of opportunities for that here ;-) I wish you all the best. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

559237 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ 559237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-15 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.142410200E09 +++$+++ Hey compadre, since you're one of my best friends here, I'm going to give you a \"sneak preview\" of the article I'm working on.  See here: [[User:Marine 69-71\/Sandbox | Sneak Preview]].  Tu Amigo,  +++$+++ Hey compadre, since you're one of my best friends here, I'm going to give you a "sneak preview" of the article I'm working on.  See here: [[User:Marine 69-71/Sandbox | Sneak Preview]].  Tu Amigo, [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 00:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
559238 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ 559237 +++$+++ 559237 +++$+++ 2006-03-15 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.142464260E09 +++$+++ Compadre, great table, go ahead and make the change.  The only modification I made was the Taino symbols.  I want to keep them in the \"right\" side of the article because I think if the article started between two images it maybe too much of a distraction.  Another thing, I'm going to get in touch with our other compadres here to see if we can decide who should be taken out of the [[List of Puerto Ricans]], I think that the singers and entertainment sections are too long and that not everyone deserves to be there.  Let me know what you think,  +++$+++ *Compadre, great table, go ahead and make the change.  The only modification I made was the Taino symbols.  I want to keep them in the "right" side of the article because I think if the article started between two images it maybe too much of a distraction.  Another thing, I'm going to get in touch with our other compadres here to see if we can decide who should be taken out of the [[List of Puerto Ricans]], I think that the singers and entertainment sections are too long and that not everyone deserves to be there.  Let me know what you think, [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 15:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

17377 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-03 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.299216600E09 +++$+++ HI. Are you still up for the Burma dabbing as I intend starting the villages in due course?\u2666  +++$+++ HI. Are you still up for the Burma dabbing as I intend starting the villages in due course?♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 21:30, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
17378 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17377 +++$+++ 17377 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I'll willingly dab them after the pages have been created. If you let me know when all the pages that share a particular name have been created, I will create the dab page with links to all the pages and brief descriptions. BTW, good to see that you\u2019re back :)  \u2014 21:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ :I'll willingly dab them after the pages have been created. If you let me know when all the pages that share a particular name have been created, I will create the dab page with links to all the pages and brief descriptions. BTW, good to see that you’re back :)  — 21:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

17379 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17379 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-08 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.299610080E09 +++$+++ This is exactly what I mean. Pages like Namkut needing moving and a dab page setting up in its place, [[Namkut, Mu-Se Township]] and [[Namkut, Ke-Hsi Township]] etc  and for the templates to be properly piped to the correct links. You see?\u2666  +++$+++ This is exactly what I mean. Pages like Namkut needing moving and a dab page setting up in its place, [[Namkut, Mu-Se Township]] and [[Namkut, Ke-Hsi Township]] etc  and for the templates to be properly piped to the correct links. You see?♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 10:48, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
17380 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17379 +++$+++ 17379 +++$+++ 2011-03-08 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.299611760E09 +++$+++ Where do you find the township data? I have downloaded the geonames dataset for Myanmar, but it only gives the state (Sagain, Shan, etc), not township. Is there another source gazetteer? \u2014  +++$+++ :Where do you find the township data? I have downloaded the geonames dataset for Myanmar, but it only gives the state (Sagain, Shan, etc), not township. Is there another source gazetteer? — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 11:16, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

279525 +++$+++ Ziggurat +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279525 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-10 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.144738020E09 +++$+++ Hi! I noticed that in your sandbox [[User:Paul_August\/Sandbox]] you have the categories still activated, so it's showing up in [[:Category:PlanetMath sourced articles]] and [[:Category:Mathematical logic]]. Could I suggest that you deactivate them (by putting a colon before 'Category' in the link) until such time as the article is in the mainspace rather than the userspace? (As per [[WP:CG]], \"If you copy an article to your user namespace (for example, as a temporary draft or in response to an edit war) you should decategorize it.\".) Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi! I noticed that in your sandbox [[User:Paul_August/Sandbox]] you have the categories still activated, so it's showing up in [[:Category:PlanetMath sourced articles]] and [[:Category:Mathematical logic]]. Could I suggest that you deactivate them (by putting a colon before 'Category' in the link) until such time as the article is in the mainspace rather than the userspace? (As per [[WP:CG]], "If you copy an article to your user namespace (for example, as a temporary draft or in response to an edit war) you should decategorize it.".) Cheers, [[User:Ziggurat|Ziggurat]] 23:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
279526 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279525 +++$+++ 279525 +++$+++ 2006-04-11 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.144748220E09 +++$+++ I've now fixed this, thanks.  +++$+++ :I've now fixed this, thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

541670 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-23 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.211563260E09 +++$+++ Hello Formadoxfraud.  Unfortunately I have just closed your recent [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Fordmadoxfraud|RFA]] as unsuccessful.  It was a close call, but there was sufficient significant opposition to warrant the closure as no consensus reached - (67\/28\/5).  Read over the opposition comments and consider trying again in a few months.   +++$+++ Hello Formadoxfraud.  Unfortunately I have just closed your recent [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fordmadoxfraud|RFA]] as unsuccessful.  It was a close call, but there was sufficient significant opposition to warrant the closure as no consensus reached - (67/28/5).  Read over the opposition comments and consider trying again in a few months.  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 10:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
541671 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541670 +++$+++ 541670 +++$+++ 2008-05-23 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.211578740E09 +++$+++ I'm not surprised.  Thanks anyway.   +++$+++ :I'm not surprised.  Thanks anyway.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 14:39, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
541672 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541670 +++$+++ 541671 +++$+++ 2008-05-23 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.211578980E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to drop by and say that I'm sorry about how it turned out. I would add that I disagreed with your opposition, but that's kind of implicit in my support. I think you would have made good use of the tools. And I share your need for caffeine. :) -- +++$+++ ::I just wanted to drop by and say that I'm sorry about how it turned out. I would add that I disagreed with your opposition, but that's kind of implicit in my support. I think you would have made good use of the tools. And I share your need for caffeine. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 14:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
541673 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541670 +++$+++ 541672 +++$+++ 2008-05-23 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.211579280E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the note, and thanks for supporting my RfA.   +++$+++ :::I appreciate the note, and thanks for supporting my RfA.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 14:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
541674 +++$+++ Channel_R +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541670 +++$+++ 541673 +++$+++ 2008-05-23 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.211610900E09 +++$+++ 67 'yes' against 28 'no' is 'no consensus'? [stunned silence] It's decisions like these that make me feel that Jimbo's famous \"adminship is no big deal\" quote hasn't got any relevance to the current attitude on the RfA pages. Anyway. I'm really sorry it failed. <span style=\"background:#FFEE91\"> +++$+++ ::::67 'yes' against 28 'no' is 'no consensus'? [stunned silence] It's decisions like these that make me feel that Jimbo's famous "adminship is no big deal" quote hasn't got any relevance to the current attitude on the RfA pages. Anyway. I'm really sorry it failed. <span style="background:#FFEE91">[[User_talk:Channel_R|&nbsp;Channel '''&reg;&nbsp;''']]</span>&nbsp; 23:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
541675 +++$+++ Mordicai +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541670 +++$+++ 541674 +++$+++ 2008-05-27 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.211923740E09 +++$+++ I'm with you on that, Channel-- especially given the gulf between how much was written by the supporters & how little was written by the opposers.  -- +++$+++ :::::I'm with you on that, Channel-- especially given the gulf between how much was written by the supporters & how little was written by the opposers.  --[[User:Mordicai|mordicai.]] ([[User talk:Mordicai|talk]]) 14:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
541676 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541670 +++$+++ 541675 +++$+++ 2008-05-27 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.211931960E09 +++$+++ You are all very kind.  Thanks.   +++$+++ ::::::You are all very kind.  Thanks.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 16:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

279527 +++$+++ Geogre +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-12 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.144877040E09 +++$+++ So, it appears that [[Attalus I]] is going to be on the main page.  She's walking down the aisle at last.  (April 25, 2006.)  Congratulations.   +++$+++ So, it appears that [[Attalus I]] is going to be on the main page.  She's walking down the aisle at last.  (April 25, 2006.)  Congratulations.  [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 14:24, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
279528 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279527 +++$+++ 279527 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.144881900E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Having become resigned to being ever the bridesmaid, she is again nervous. She now expects someone will point out that, in fact, she is no lady for the altar, but rather an old whore deserving to be FARCed. I suppose I must now stand vigil the night before seeking expiation for our sins?  +++$+++ :Thanks. Having become resigned to being ever the bridesmaid, she is again nervous. She now expects someone will point out that, in fact, she is no lady for the altar, but rather an old whore deserving to be FARCed. I suppose I must now stand vigil the night before seeking expiation for our sins? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:45, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

17385 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17385 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-12 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.299960840E09 +++$+++ Dunno what table of data you mean. Plastikspork was the one who downloaded them, perhaps ask him?\u2666  +++$+++ Dunno what table of data you mean. Plastikspork was the one who downloaded them, perhaps ask him?♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 12:14, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
17386 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17385 +++$+++ 17385 +++$+++ 2011-03-14 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.300111140E09 +++$+++ You\u2019re much more experienced with this sort of thing. Isn\u2019t it worth spending the time to get all the 41000 names fixed and correct at the start (before creating the articles)? And I'd rather spend a little time getting the strategy right and writing a few lines of code to automate the whole thing, instead of trying to do them one by one \u2013 better to whizz than plod :) \u2014  +++$+++ :You’re much more experienced with this sort of thing. Isn’t it worth spending the time to get all the 41000 names fixed and correct at the start (before creating the articles)? And I'd rather spend a little time getting the strategy right and writing a few lines of code to automate the whole thing, instead of trying to do them one by one – better to whizz than plod :) — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 06:59, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

279532 +++$+++ Celestianpower +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279532 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-23 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.145850120E09 +++$+++ Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that [[WP:ESP\/EL|the elections]] are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on [[2006-04-29]]. Please vote [[Wikipedia:Esperanza\/April 2006 elections\/vote|here]]. Thanks. --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Celestianpower\/Esperanza|es]]<\/font> +++$+++ Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that [[WP:ESP/EL|the elections]] are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on [[2006-04-29]]. Please vote [[Wikipedia:Esperanza/April 2006 elections/vote|here]]. Thanks. --[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color="green">[[User:Celestianpower/Esperanza|es]]</font>[[User:Celestianpower|tianpower]] <sup>[[user talk:Celestianpower|háblame]]</sup> 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
279533 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279532 +++$+++ 279532 +++$+++ 2006-04-30 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.146432060E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
279534 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279532 +++$+++ 279532 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.146687060E09 +++$+++ Hello. The proof outline you inserted is copied verbatim from ''Infinity and the Mind'' by Rudy Rucker, which is copyrighted text, publishing it in Wikipedia could be a copyright violation. Your \"refutation\" is an apparent violation of [[WP:NOR]].  +++$+++ :Hello. The proof outline you inserted is copied verbatim from ''Infinity and the Mind'' by Rudy Rucker, which is copyrighted text, publishing it in Wikipedia could be a copyright violation. Your "refutation" is an apparent violation of [[WP:NOR]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

541677 +++$+++ Kevin Murray +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541677 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-28 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.212019500E09 +++$+++ FM,  I was gone from Friday till Tuesday with scrambling on either side of the trip, so I didn't get to write sooner.  I'm really sorry that it didn't work out.  I think that two biased editors shot you down with energized buzz words, and then we had a drive-by pile-on.  I too edit in some pretty unsavory articles from time to time to keep WP uncensored but out of the gutter and avoiding soapbox.  I think that those who don't get into the edgier issues lack the experience to solve problems, but it is hard to stand in the gutter without getting stinky.  Good luck!  -- +++$+++ FM,  I was gone from Friday till Tuesday with scrambling on either side of the trip, so I didn't get to write sooner.  I'm really sorry that it didn't work out.  I think that two biased editors shot you down with energized buzz words, and then we had a drive-by pile-on.  I too edit in some pretty unsavory articles from time to time to keep WP uncensored but out of the gutter and avoiding soapbox.  I think that those who don't get into the edgier issues lack the experience to solve problems, but it is hard to stand in the gutter without getting stinky.  Good luck!  --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] ([[User talk:Kevin Murray|talk]]) 17:05, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
541678 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541677 +++$+++ 541677 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.212630600E09 +++$+++ You know... one becomes much less of an inclusionist when one goes heavy into newpage patrol. I'm sure you'll do better next time around.  +++$+++ :You know... one becomes much less of an inclusionist when one goes heavy into newpage patrol. I'm sure you'll do better next time around. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 18:50, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

17390 +++$+++ Kathodonnell +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-04 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.299238620E09 +++$+++ cheers. I just noticed I'd been doing them in the wrong format, so thanks for fixing them  +++$+++ cheers. I just noticed I'd been doing them in the wrong format, so thanks for fixing them [[User:Kathodonnell|Kathodonnell]] ([[User talk:Kathodonnell|talk]]) 03:37, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
17391 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17390 +++$+++ 17390 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.299249180E09 +++$+++ Pleased to help :) \u2014  +++$+++ :Pleased to help :) — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 06:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

279535 +++$+++  +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279535 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -- PCE 02:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ -- PCE 02:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
279536 +++$+++ Lethe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279535 +++$+++ 279535 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.146736560E09 +++$+++ see [[User_talk:Trovatore#Godel]] and [[User_talk:Aleph4#Your_reversion_of_G.C3.B6del]] for other places this discussion is taking place (might be nice if all three discussions were moved to the [[Talk:G\xf6del's incompleteness theorems|talk page]]). - +++$+++ :see [[User_talk:Trovatore#Godel]] and [[User_talk:Aleph4#Your_reversion_of_G.C3.B6del]] for other places this discussion is taking place (might be nice if all three discussions were moved to the [[Talk:Gödel's incompleteness theorems|talk page]]). -[[User:Lethe/sig|lethe]] <sup>[[User talk:Lethe/sig|talk]] [{{fullurl:User talk:Lethe|action=edit&section=new}} +]</sup> 02:56, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
279537 +++$+++ Lethe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279535 +++$+++ 279536 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.146736680E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia is not a place for you to carry out a conversation about your refutations of an author's work.  Your refutation is original research, and so is not allowed.  If you want to get comments on why your refutation is wrong, we'd be happy to help you at [[Wikipedia:Reference Desk\/Mathematics]]. - +++$+++ ::Wikipedia is not a place for you to carry out a conversation about your refutations of an author's work.  Your refutation is original research, and so is not allowed.  If you want to get comments on why your refutation is wrong, we'd be happy to help you at [[Wikipedia:Reference Desk/Mathematics]]. -[[User:Lethe/sig|lethe]] <sup>[[User talk:Lethe/sig|talk]] [{{fullurl:User talk:Lethe|action=edit&section=new}} +]</sup> 02:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
279538 +++$+++  +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279535 +++$+++ 279535 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.146738780E09 +++$+++ In regard to the [[WP:NOR]] it appears that in terms of items 1,2,4,5 you may very well be right so I will exclude my refutation until such time as I can meet items 7 using a \"reputable\" publication or item 5 using something other than the validity of the refutation itself.  -- PCE 03:33, 4 May 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ *In regard to the [[WP:NOR]] it appears that in terms of items 1,2,4,5 you may very well be right so I will exclude my refutation until such time as I can meet items 7 using a "reputable" publication or item 5 using something other than the validity of the refutation itself.  -- PCE 03:33, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
279539 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279535 +++$+++ 279535 +++$+++ 2006-05-04 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.146770580E09 +++$+++ Good.  +++$+++ :Good. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 12:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

17392 +++$+++ Cuprum17 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17392 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-11 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.299909480E09 +++$+++ Thank you for putting the polish on the article I wrote.  It's always the little things that I overlook that detract, plus I could do a little better in the spelling department at times.  I don't know how many times I proofread the article and still missed a few things; you were that fresh set of eyes...Thanks again. Cheers.   +++$+++ Thank you for putting the polish on the article I wrote.  It's always the little things that I overlook that detract, plus I could do a little better in the spelling department at times.  I don't know how many times I proofread the article and still missed a few things; you were that fresh set of eyes...Thanks again. Cheers.  [[User:Cuprum17|Cuprum17]] ([[User talk:Cuprum17|talk]]) 21:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
17393 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17392 +++$+++ 17392 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.299909900E09 +++$+++ You\u2019re very welcome \u2013 pleased to help :) \u2014  +++$+++ :You’re very welcome – pleased to help :) — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 22:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

541681 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-07 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.212885420E09 +++$+++ Also keep in mind [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Ego the Living Planet|Ego the Living Planet]]'s AFD, which resulted in a snowball keep.  +++$+++ Also keep in mind [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ego the Living Planet|Ego the Living Planet]]'s AFD, which resulted in a snowball keep. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 17:37, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
541682 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541681 +++$+++ 541681 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.213135620E09 +++$+++ You might want to be careful about which article names you throw about and how often ... voted \"keep\" once doesn't mean no one can ever mess with it again, and someone might take repeated mentions of a failed AFD on an obscure character as a challenge to try again. :)  +++$+++ :You might want to be careful about which article names you throw about and how often ... voted "keep" once doesn't mean no one can ever mess with it again, and someone might take repeated mentions of a failed AFD on an obscure character as a challenge to try again. :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 15:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
541683 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541681 +++$+++ 541682 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.213136520E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm not really turned on by the idea of keeping possibly controversial articles by \"hiding\" them from people who might want to nominate them for deletion.   +++$+++ ::Yeah, I'm not really turned on by the idea of keeping possibly controversial articles by "hiding" them from people who might want to nominate them for deletion.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 15:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

17394 +++$+++ Jenks24 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17394 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-20 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.300650120E09 +++$+++ Hi, I see you're currently (or at least very recently) using AWB to change article to list references. To be honest most editors don't use list references and they're much harder for newbies to understand, so I'm unsure why you're using AWB to make this change. Could you please explain why you are doing this, or point to somewhere that says it is ok to do this with AWB? Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi, I see you're currently (or at least very recently) using AWB to change article to list references. To be honest most editors don't use list references and they're much harder for newbies to understand, so I'm unsure why you're using AWB to make this change. Could you please explain why you are doing this, or point to somewhere that says it is ok to do this with AWB? Cheers, [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 12:42, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
17395 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17394 +++$+++ 17394 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.300652400E09 +++$+++ I was just trying to make articles easier to edit and maintain. Inline references, particularly long ones, make it very difficult to work with the text of the article, especially for newbies, because a paragraph may get bloated out by references into many disconnected parts. List-defined references make it much cleaner. However, I was unaware that I was transgressing a sentence in the rulebook I didn't know existed \u2013 see Binksternet\u2019s comment below. I\u2019ll stop. Cheers \u2014  +++$+++ :I was just trying to make articles easier to edit and maintain. Inline references, particularly long ones, make it very difficult to work with the text of the article, especially for newbies, because a paragraph may get bloated out by references into many disconnected parts. List-defined references make it much cleaner. However, I was unaware that I was transgressing a sentence in the rulebook I didn't know existed – see Binksternet’s comment below. I’ll stop. Cheers — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 13:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
17396 +++$+++ Jenks24 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17394 +++$+++ 17395 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.300659960E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks for replying. As you may have guessed, I'm not a huge fan of list-defined references, as I personally feel they make it even harder for newbies to understand how to insert references. Anyway, I note that you stopped as soon as concerns were raised and I thank you for that and understand you were acting in good faith. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Ok, thanks for replying. As you may have guessed, I'm not a huge fan of list-defined references, as I personally feel they make it even harder for newbies to understand how to insert references. Anyway, I note that you stopped as soon as concerns were raised and I thank you for that and understand you were acting in good faith. Cheers, [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 15:26, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

279540 +++$+++ IanManka +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279540 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-14 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.147668420E09 +++$+++ This talk page is becoming ''very long''. Please consider [[Wikipedia:How_to_archive_a_talk_page|archiving]]. \u2014  +++$+++ This talk page is becoming ''very long''. Please consider [[Wikipedia:How_to_archive_a_talk_page|archiving]]. — [[User:IanManka|Ian Manka]] <small>[[User talk:IanManka|Talk to me‼]]</small> 21:47, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
279541 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279540 +++$+++ 279540 +++$+++ 2006-05-15 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.147686600E09 +++$+++ I should really floss more often as well.  +++$+++ :I should really floss more often as well. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:50, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

17397 +++$+++ Binksternet +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-20 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.300650720E09 +++$+++ If you wish to continue with this path you ought to have the guideline at CITEVAR changed.  +++$+++ If you wish to continue with this path you ought to have the guideline at CITEVAR changed. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 12:52, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
17398 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17397 +++$+++ 17397 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.300651740E09 +++$+++ Oops. I read the description at [[:Template:Reflist#List-defined_references]] and thought these were a brilliant idea for uncluttering reference-laden text, making it much easier to edit and maintain. I should obviously have searched the rulebook before starting to use them. Thanks for pointing this out. \u2014  +++$+++ :Oops. I read the description at [[:Template:Reflist#List-defined_references]] and thought these were a brilliant idea for uncluttering reference-laden text, making it much easier to edit and maintain. I should obviously have searched the rulebook before starting to use them. Thanks for pointing this out. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 13:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
17399 +++$+++ Binksternet +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17397 +++$+++ 17398 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.300663920E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your quick response.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your quick response. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 16:32, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
17400 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17397 +++$+++ 17399 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.300669020E09 +++$+++ That's OK. Thanks to you for pointing it out. I looked again at [[WP:CITEVAR]] and realised that I have in fact read it before, but I read it as meaning ''changing the visible style within the article'' \u2013 like changing ''Notes'' to ''References'' or imposing a particular academic referencing style (Harvard, Chicago, etc) or changing between paranthetical and ref tags. Since I was only tidying the syntax of the page (in a way that did not alter the appearance to the reader), making it easier to edit and maintain, it never occurred to me that it might be covered by the statements in [[WP:CITEVAR]]. I'm still not convinced that the term ''Citation Style'' as used in [[WP:CITEVAR]] refers to what I was doing. But since two people raised objections, it is obviously open to different interpretations. Sincere regards \u2014  +++$+++ :::That's OK. Thanks to you for pointing it out. I looked again at [[WP:CITEVAR]] and realised that I have in fact read it before, but I read it as meaning ''changing the visible style within the article'' – like changing ''Notes'' to ''References'' or imposing a particular academic referencing style (Harvard, Chicago, etc) or changing between paranthetical and ref tags. Since I was only tidying the syntax of the page (in a way that did not alter the appearance to the reader), making it easier to edit and maintain, it never occurred to me that it might be covered by the statements in [[WP:CITEVAR]]. I'm still not convinced that the term ''Citation Style'' as used in [[WP:CITEVAR]] refers to what I was doing. But since two people raised objections, it is obviously open to different interpretations. Sincere regards — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 17:57, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

279542 +++$+++ Eagle 101 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-22 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.148293860E09 +++$+++ Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia! <br><br> Be sure to put warning tags on the vandal's user talk page (such as <code>{{[[Template:test|subst:test]]}}<\/code>, <code>{{[[Template:Test2|subst:test2]]}}<\/code>, <code>{{[[Template:Test3|subst:test3]]}}<\/code>, <code>{{[[Template:Test4|subst:test4]]}}<\/code>).  Add each of these tags on the vandal's talk page, in sequential order, after each instance of vandalism.   Adding warnings to the talk page assists administrators in determining whether or not the user should be blocked.  If the user continues to vandalize pages after you add the <code>{{[[Template:Test4|subst:test4]]}}<\/code> tag, request administrator assistance at [[Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism|Request for Intervention]].  Again, thank you for helping to make Wikipedia better.  +++$+++ Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia! <br><br> Be sure to put warning tags on the vandal's user talk page (such as <code>{{[[Template:test|subst:test]]}}</code>, <code>{{[[Template:Test2|subst:test2]]}}</code>, <code>{{[[Template:Test3|subst:test3]]}}</code>, <code>{{[[Template:Test4|subst:test4]]}}</code>).  Add each of these tags on the vandal's talk page, in sequential order, after each instance of vandalism.   Adding warnings to the talk page assists administrators in determining whether or not the user should be blocked.  If the user continues to vandalize pages after you add the <code>{{[[Template:Test4|subst:test4]]}}</code> tag, request administrator assistance at [[Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism|Request for Intervention]].  Again, thank you for helping to make Wikipedia better. [[user:Eagle 101|Eagle]]  [[user_talk:Eagle 101|talk]] 03:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
279543 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279542 +++$+++ 279542 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.148294220E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. I am quite familiar with the various warning templates, and their usage. But I often don't add them to the editors talk page. It depends on how much time I want to devote to such activities.  +++$+++ :You are welcome. I am quite familiar with the various warning templates, and their usage. But I often don't add them to the editors talk page. It depends on how much time I want to devote to such activities. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

279545 +++$+++ QQ +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279545 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-28 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.148858160E09 +++$+++ Let's discuss which term is better!! +++$+++ Let's discuss which term is better!![[User:QQ|QQ]] 16:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
279546 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279545 +++$+++ 279545 +++$+++ 2006-05-28 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.148859780E09 +++$+++ Hi QQ, thanks for the invitation to talk I've replied on [[Talk:Exclusive disjunction]].  +++$+++ :Hi QQ, thanks for the invitation to talk I've replied on [[Talk:Exclusive disjunction]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

279547 +++$+++ QQ +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-28 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.148859480E09 +++$+++ if you think \"Sheffer Stroke\" is less common than \"Logical NAND\"?? +++$+++ if you think "Sheffer Stroke" is less common than "Logical NAND"??[[User:QQ|QQ]] 16:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
279548 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279547 +++$+++ 279547 +++$+++ 2006-05-28 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.148864340E09 +++$+++ Hi QQ, I'll take a look when I get a change.  +++$+++ :Hi QQ, I'll take a look when I get a change. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:59, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

541692 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-12 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.213326120E09 +++$+++ Re: Sacntum Sanctorum - d'oh!  :)  +++$+++ Re: Sacntum Sanctorum - d'oh!  :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 20:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
541693 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541692 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.213329840E09 +++$+++ One thing: If there are in-universe facts verifiable by a particular issue of a comic book itself, then that issue is the direct, concrete source to cite. Citing this book for things that the comics themselves verify seems like book promotion. -- +++$+++ ::One thing: If there are in-universe facts verifiable by a particular issue of a comic book itself, then that issue is the direct, concrete source to cite. Citing this book for things that the comics themselves verify seems like book promotion. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 21:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
541694 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541692 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.213333560E09 +++$+++ Good to have someone with us with such obvious research skills! I'm quite a bit looking forward to working with you. We have some excellent editors here; it's a pretty nice community overall. -- +++$+++ :::Good to have someone with us with such obvious research skills! I'm quite a bit looking forward to working with you. We have some excellent editors here; it's a pretty nice community overall. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 22:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

279549 +++$+++ QQ +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-28 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.148864580E09 +++$+++ I think moving Sheffer Stroke to Logical NAND is not possible, by wikipedia's ''historical'' reason... +++$+++ I think moving Sheffer Stroke to Logical NAND is not possible, by wikipedia's ''historical'' reason...[[User:QQ|QQ]] 18:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
279550 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279549 +++$+++ 279549 +++$+++ 2006-05-28 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.148865300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

17407 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-29 13:15:00 +++$+++ 1.301429700E09 +++$+++ Excellent work. Thanks. I believe the convention is to drop the district and township names from the end. E,g [[Abaw, Ye]].\u2666 [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps;color:#000\">Dr. Blofeld<\/span>]] 13:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)\u2666  +++$+++ Excellent work. Thanks. I believe the convention is to drop the district and township names from the end. E,g [[Abaw, Ye]].♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 13:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 13:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
17408 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17407 +++$+++ 17407 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.301433180E09 +++$+++ Please explain. My column 4 shows the proposed unique names. I didn't propose [[Abaw, Ye]]. I was proposing [[Abaw]] because it's unique. Do you mean that I am right? \u2014  +++$+++ :Please explain. My column 4 shows the proposed unique names. I didn't propose [[Abaw, Ye]]. I was proposing [[Abaw]] because it's unique. Do you mean that I am right? — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 14:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

541696 +++$+++ CSDWarnBot +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541696 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-13 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.213398180E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information_icon.svg|left]]Hello, this is a message from [[User:CSDWarnBot|an automated bot]]. A tag has been placed on [[:Vithericus]], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|[[User:{{{nominator}}}|{{{nominator}}}]]&nbsp;([[User talk:{{{nominator}}}|talk]]&nbsp;'''\xb7''' [[Special:Contributions\/{{{nominator}}}|contribs]]),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:Vithericus]] is a redirect to a non-existent page ([[WP:CSD#R1|CSD R1]]). <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting [[:Vithericus]], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}<\/nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. Feel free to contact the [[User:CSDWarnBot|bot operator]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&page={{urlencode:Vithericus}} here]'''  +++$+++ [[Image:Information_icon.svg|left]]Hello, this is a message from [[User:CSDWarnBot|an automated bot]]. A tag has been placed on [[:Vithericus]], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|[[User:{{{nominator}}}|{{{nominator}}}]]&nbsp;([[User talk:{{{nominator}}}|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{{nominator}}}|contribs]]),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:Vithericus]] is a redirect to a non-existent page ([[WP:CSD#R1|CSD R1]]). <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting [[:Vithericus]], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. Feel free to contact the [[User:CSDWarnBot|bot operator]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page={{urlencode:Vithericus}} here]''' [[User:CSDWarnBot|CSDWarnBot]] ([[User talk:CSDWarnBot|talk]]) 16:03, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
541697 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541696 +++$+++ 541696 +++$+++ 2008-06-13 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.213399200E09 +++$+++ Go for it.  I thought there was an article there to redirect to.  If not, delete, wily robot, delete.   +++$+++ :Go for it.  I thought there was an article there to redirect to.  If not, delete, wily robot, delete.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 16:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

279553 +++$+++ Daniel5127 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279553 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-31 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.149075900E09 +++$+++ Hi, Paul. I have to say something about article. Before about 2 or 3days ago, I saw that my edit was reverted by  you. I mean I tell about this[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mathematics&diff=55191488&oldid=55190479] . That means you reverted my edits. I just changed ''Understand and describing change'' into ''Understand and Describing Change''. I don't know why you reverted back to last version. You considered this is vandalism. But, I didn't attempt to vandalize the article. Anyways. Leave me message on my discussion's page No.64. Ok?  +++$+++ Hi, Paul. I have to say something about article. Before about 2 or 3days ago, I saw that my edit was reverted by  you. I mean I tell about this[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mathematics&diff=55191488&oldid=55190479] . That means you reverted my edits. I just changed ''Understand and describing change'' into ''Understand and Describing Change''. I don't know why you reverted back to last version. You considered this is vandalism. But, I didn't attempt to vandalize the article. Anyways. Leave me message on my discussion's page No.64. Ok? [[User:Daniel5127|Daniel5127]], 04:45, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
279554 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279553 +++$+++ 279553 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.149077280E09 +++$+++ Hi Daniel. Yes I reverted [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mathematics&diff=55191488&oldid=55190479 your edit] to [[mathematics]]. I didn't necessarily consider your edit to be vandalism, but I did consider the capitalization of \"Describing Change\" as inappropriate. It would have been better if I had written an edit summary explaining this, I don't actually recall my revert, but I'm afraid I was probably just being lazy. I'm sorry and I apologize if you felt you were wrongly being accused of vandalism.  +++$+++ :Hi Daniel. Yes I reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mathematics&diff=55191488&oldid=55190479 your edit] to [[mathematics]]. I didn't necessarily consider your edit to be vandalism, but I did consider the capitalization of "Describing Change" as inappropriate. It would have been better if I had written an edit summary explaining this, I don't actually recall my revert, but I'm afraid I was probably just being lazy. I'm sorry and I apologize if you felt you were wrongly being accused of vandalism. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
279555 +++$+++ Daniel5127 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279553 +++$+++ 279554 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.149079260E09 +++$+++ It's ok. I accept your apology. But It is key concept. Because someone already mentioned that. Basically, it is key concept like Understand and describing into ''Understand and Describing''. Anyways, Thanks for providing the evidence that you reverted back to last version. Reply on my talk page.  +++$+++ ::It's ok. I accept your apology. But It is key concept. Because someone already mentioned that. Basically, it is key concept like Understand and describing into ''Understand and Describing''. Anyways, Thanks for providing the evidence that you reverted back to last version. Reply on my talk page. [[User:Daniel5127|Daniel5127]], 05:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
279556 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279553 +++$+++ 279553 +++$+++ 2006-06-11 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.150070820E09 +++$+++ Hi Bernard. I will reply at [[Talk:Bernard Haisch]]. By the way, as a courtesy to other editors, can you please \"sign\" your talk page posts by typing four tilde's <nowiki>\"~~~~\"<\/nowiki>? The software (under the default settings) will replace the four tildes with your username, together with a time and date stamp (like the one following my post here). Regards &mdash;  +++$+++ :Hi Bernard. I will reply at [[Talk:Bernard Haisch]]. By the way, as a courtesy to other editors, can you please "sign" your talk page posts by typing four tilde's <nowiki>"~~~~"</nowiki>? The software (under the default settings) will replace the four tildes with your username, together with a time and date stamp (like the one following my post here). Regards &mdash; [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
279557 +++$+++ Hillman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279553 +++$+++ 279556 +++$+++ 2006-06-11 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.150083060E09 +++$+++ Hi, Paul, could you please use [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Bernard_Haisch&oldid=57968693 this version] for your comparision?  Presently your section in [[Talk:Bernard Haisch|Haisch's user talk page]] makes it look like I simply reverted the version by Haisch, which is not true.  You might also see my [[User talk:Hillman|user talk page]], since I think that if you look into this, I have in fact been highly responsive to Haisch's concerns, I just don't think he should be allowed to write his own profile here.  Therefore, ''I think the version I cited above should be the basis for your revised revision''.  Also, could you explain in [[Talk:Bernard Haisch]] what you did after your new revision?  TIA --- +++$+++ ::Hi, Paul, could you please use [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bernard_Haisch&oldid=57968693 this version] for your comparision?  Presently your section in [[Talk:Bernard Haisch|Haisch's user talk page]] makes it look like I simply reverted the version by Haisch, which is not true.  You might also see my [[User talk:Hillman|user talk page]], since I think that if you look into this, I have in fact been highly responsive to Haisch's concerns, I just don't think he should be allowed to write his own profile here.  Therefore, ''I think the version I cited above should be the basis for your revised revision''.  Also, could you explain in [[Talk:Bernard Haisch]] what you did after your new revision?  TIA ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 20:31, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
279558 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279553 +++$+++ 279557 +++$+++ 2006-06-11 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.150094520E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

17411 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-14 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.302833160E09 +++$+++ What;s the current status?\u2666  +++$+++ What;s the current status?♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 19:06, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
17412 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17411 +++$+++ 17411 +++$+++ 2011-04-14 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.302834840E09 +++$+++ Please read the long message I left on your talk page about place names... Cheers, \u2013  +++$+++ :Please read the long message I left on your talk page about place names... Cheers, – [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 19:34, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
17413 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17411 +++$+++ 17412 +++$+++ 2011-04-15 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.302913560E09 +++$+++ Did you have time to check and confirm? I'd value your input before I go ahead\u2026 \u2013  +++$+++ ::Did you have time to check and confirm? I'd value your input before I go ahead… – [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 17:26, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

541702 +++$+++  +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Awesome  +++$+++ Awesome [[Special:Contributions/Fordmadoxfraud|work]]! <span style="font: 13pt 'Arial';">«</span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D. Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style="color: #000;">talk</span>]])''' 20:05 [[2008]] [[June 16]] (UTC)
541703 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541702 +++$+++ 541702 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.213674540E09 +++$+++ My first barnstar!  Sweet.   +++$+++ :My first barnstar!  Sweet.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 20:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

17415 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17415 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-23 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.303607640E09 +++$+++ So what's the plan now then?\u2666  +++$+++ So what's the plan now then?♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 18:14, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
17416 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17415 +++$+++ 17415 +++$+++ 2011-04-23 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.303615980E09 +++$+++ Life is very busy this week, so will aim to get started in May. Would be grateful for answers to my three questions above. \u2014  +++$+++ :Life is very busy this week, so will aim to get started in May. Would be grateful for answers to my three questions above. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:33, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

541704 +++$+++ DanielRigal +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-16 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.213674360E09 +++$+++ I see that you voted \"strong keep\" on [[Slam book]] and suggested that it would be easy to source. I would like to hold you to that. So far, the article has a single reference which is no better than a partial definition. If you can do anything to improve this it would be much appreciated. -- +++$+++ I see that you voted "strong keep" on [[Slam book]] and suggested that it would be easy to source. I would like to hold you to that. So far, the article has a single reference which is no better than a partial definition. If you can do anything to improve this it would be much appreciated. --[[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal|talk]]) 20:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
541705 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541704 +++$+++ 541704 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.213674600E09 +++$+++ I like a challenge!  Unfortunately, I'm leaving for Mexico in a couple hours, so I probably won't have much chance to tinker with the article.  But I promise it'll be high on my to-do list when I return from holiday.  Cheers.   +++$+++ :I like a challenge!  Unfortunately, I'm leaving for Mexico in a couple hours, so I probably won't have much chance to tinker with the article.  But I promise it'll be high on my to-do list when I return from holiday.  Cheers.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 20:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

17417 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-24 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.303697880E09 +++$+++ Absolutely,I fully agree. I'm always dubious about places with the same name in very close proximity anyway.. In the meantime I'll try to get the nav templates for Shan State made, I've done the rest. Mmm uploading 40,000 pages would require approval by BAG if you are running a script. I guess I'll have to try to convince them of articles like [[Gwebin]] etc that it is definitely worth having the stubs create on the pathway to the \"sum\" LOL. As long as they are veriable and can be expanded at a later date I can't see why it should be a problem.. As long as you can create them with a reference to geonames and a map and coordinates in an infobox.. \u2666  +++$+++ Absolutely,I fully agree. I'm always dubious about places with the same name in very close proximity anyway.. In the meantime I'll try to get the nav templates for Shan State made, I've done the rest. Mmm uploading 40,000 pages would require approval by BAG if you are running a script. I guess I'll have to try to convince them of articles like [[Gwebin]] etc that it is definitely worth having the stubs create on the pathway to the "sum" LOL. As long as they are veriable and can be expanded at a later date I can't see why it should be a problem.. As long as you can create them with a reference to geonames and a map and coordinates in an infobox.. ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 19:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
17418 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17417 +++$+++ 17417 +++$+++ 2011-04-24 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.303702500E09 +++$+++ Regarding verifiability and references, maybe I will create a sample page the way I envisage them to look \u2013 and you can tell me what, if any, further features it should have. \u2014  +++$+++ :Regarding verifiability and references, maybe I will create a sample page the way I envisage them to look – and you can tell me what, if any, further features it should have. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:35, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

541706 +++$+++ Dynaflow +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-18 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.213786680E09 +++$+++ The fact that Seung Hui Cho turned out to be a murderous psychopath doesn't change the fact of his association with Virginia Tech as a former student.  For precedent, note that [[Charles Whitman]] can be found in [[:Category:University of Texas at Austin alumni]].   +++$+++ The fact that Seung Hui Cho turned out to be a murderous psychopath doesn't change the fact of his association with Virginia Tech as a former student.  For precedent, note that [[Charles Whitman]] can be found in [[:Category:University of Texas at Austin alumni]].  [[User:Dynaflow|<font color="#285991">--'''''Dynaflow'''''</font>]] [[User_talk:Dynaflow|<small><font color="#285991">babble</font></small>]] 03:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
541707 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541706 +++$+++ 541706 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.214354820E09 +++$+++ I stand corrected in that case.  Cheers.   +++$+++ :I stand corrected in that case.  Cheers.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 17:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

17419 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17419 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-08 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.304910300E09 +++$+++ Any developments?\u2666  +++$+++ Any developments?♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 20:05, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
17420 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17419 +++$+++ 17419 +++$+++ 2011-05-16 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.305552000E09 +++$+++ Sorry, very busy in RL over the past days. Before that, I was working on a boilerplate page format. Would be grateful if you could take a look at [[:User:Hebrides\/sandbox2]] and give me a crit. I've been meaning to search the rules, regs, guidelines and MOS for anything that impacts on this, but haven't had the time. It would be a shame to break some rule or other on 40000 new pages! I'm not sure about the ''See also'' section \u2013 whether it is valid to put similar place names in a section like this. I vaguely seem to remember that there is a rule that you mustn't link to a dab page from a ''See also'' section but cannot remember where or why. Maybe I should omit the ''See also'' section? The only additional ingredient I would put in would be a DEFAULTSORT on pages whose titles have diacritics. Your comments on this sample page would be greatly valued. Be as critical as you like ;) Cheers \u2014  +++$+++ :Sorry, very busy in RL over the past days. Before that, I was working on a boilerplate page format. Would be grateful if you could take a look at [[:User:Hebrides/sandbox2]] and give me a crit. I've been meaning to search the rules, regs, guidelines and MOS for anything that impacts on this, but haven't had the time. It would be a shame to break some rule or other on 40000 new pages! I'm not sure about the ''See also'' section – whether it is valid to put similar place names in a section like this. I vaguely seem to remember that there is a rule that you mustn't link to a dab page from a ''See also'' section but cannot remember where or why. Maybe I should omit the ''See also'' section? The only additional ingredient I would put in would be a DEFAULTSORT on pages whose titles have diacritics. Your comments on this sample page would be greatly valued. Be as critical as you like ;) Cheers — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 06:20, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

26767 +++$+++ Mick gold +++$+++ Wikiklrsc +++$+++ 26767 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-18 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311025740E09 +++$+++ I agree that, as you write, \"the Wikipedia community owns the article, not one gatekeeper or editor\". I would be happy to abide by a consensus on the Further Reading issue - as it emerges on the Talk page.  best wishes  +++$+++ I agree that, as you write, "the Wikipedia community owns the article, not one gatekeeper or editor". I would be happy to abide by a consensus on the Further Reading issue - as it emerges on the Talk page.  best wishes [[User:Mick gold|Mick gold]] ([[User talk:Mick gold|talk]]) 14:49, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
26768 +++$+++ Mick gold +++$+++ Wikiklrsc +++$+++ 26767 +++$+++ 26767 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.311032580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply, Bob. My opinion is that books will get cited in major WP articles when they contribute something important, either in factual knowledge, or in interpretation. In this way, the significance of a book will be conveyed by a serious WP article.  imho Heylin's biography and Sounes's biography undertook serious research and get cited where they shed light on mysterious episodes in Dylan's career, eg the motorcycle accident, his Christian phase, his second marriage. I think Wilentz's book has 2 brilliant chapters, one on Dylan's relationship with the Beat authors, the other on ''Blonde on Blonde''. I am currently trying to improve the WP ''Blonde on Blonde'' article and have cited Wilentz several times. In this way, I suspect Yaffe's book will also appear in WP Dylan articles, as his insights & achievements are recongnised. best wishes  +++$+++ :Thanks for your reply, Bob. My opinion is that books will get cited in major WP articles when they contribute something important, either in factual knowledge, or in interpretation. In this way, the significance of a book will be conveyed by a serious WP article.  imho Heylin's biography and Sounes's biography undertook serious research and get cited where they shed light on mysterious episodes in Dylan's career, eg the motorcycle accident, his Christian phase, his second marriage. I think Wilentz's book has 2 brilliant chapters, one on Dylan's relationship with the Beat authors, the other on ''Blonde on Blonde''. I am currently trying to improve the WP ''Blonde on Blonde'' article and have cited Wilentz several times. In this way, I suspect Yaffe's book will also appear in WP Dylan articles, as his insights & achievements are recongnised. best wishes [[User:Mick gold|Mick gold]] ([[User talk:Mick gold|talk]]) 16:43, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

279565 +++$+++ Haisch +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279565 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-12 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.150163940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Haisch|Haisch]] 18:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
279566 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279565 +++$+++ 279565 +++$+++ 2006-06-12 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.150164060E09 +++$+++ Your welcome.  +++$+++ :Your welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

541710 +++$+++ Gazimoff +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-27 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.214594520E09 +++$+++ Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}. I've noticed that you have a completed set of responses to the [[WP:RREV|RfA Review]] question phase at [[User:Fordmadoxfraud\/RfA review]], but they don't seem to be included on the list of responses [[Wikipedia:RfA_Review\/Question\/Responses|here]]. If you've completed your responses, please can you head to [[Wikipedia:RfA Review\/Question\/Responses]] and add a link to them at the bottom of the list so that they get included in the research. We have a closing date of midnight UTC on '''1st July''', so please add your link before this date. Once again, thank you for taking the time to participate in the [[WP:RREV\/Q|Question Phase]] of [[WP:RREV|RfA Review]].'''''<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}. I've noticed that you have a completed set of responses to the [[WP:RREV|RfA Review]] question phase at [[User:Fordmadoxfraud/RfA review]], but they don't seem to be included on the list of responses [[Wikipedia:RfA_Review/Question/Responses|here]]. If you've completed your responses, please can you head to [[Wikipedia:RfA Review/Question/Responses]] and add a link to them at the bottom of the list so that they get included in the research. We have a closing date of midnight UTC on '''1st July''', so please add your link before this date. Once again, thank you for taking the time to participate in the [[WP:RREV/Q|Question Phase]] of [[WP:RREV|RfA Review]].'''''<font color="green">[[User:Gazimoff|Gazimoff]]</font>''''' <sup><font color="blue">[[User talk:Gazimoff|Write]]</font></sup><sub><font color="black">[[Special:Contributions/Gazimoff|Read]]</font></sub> 12:22, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
541711 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541710 +++$+++ 541710 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.214800020E09 +++$+++ Mighty kind of you.  Thanks.   +++$+++ :Mighty kind of you.  Thanks.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 21:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

279568 +++$+++ Haisch +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-12 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.150169520E09 +++$+++ Thought I was logged in but I wasn't. +++$+++ Thought I was logged in but I wasn't.[[User:Haisch|Haisch]] 20:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
279569 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279568 +++$+++ 279568 +++$+++ 2006-06-12 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.150169640E09 +++$+++ I have no objection to that. That is probably a good idea.  +++$+++ :I have no objection to that. That is probably a good idea. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

541713 +++$+++ Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-05 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.215242760E09 +++$+++ As you are a [[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles#Nice comments other contributors said about or in support of me.21|nice Wikipedian]], I just wanted to wish you a happy [[Independence Day]]!  And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway!  :)  Your friend and colleague, --<font face=\"Times New Roman\">Happy Independence Day!   +++$+++ As you are a [[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles#Nice comments other contributors said about or in support of me.21|nice Wikipedian]], I just wanted to wish you a happy [[Independence Day]]!  And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway!  :)  Your friend and colleague, --<font face="Times New Roman">Happy Independence Day!  [[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|<span style="color:#009">Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|Tally-ho!]]''</sup> 00:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
541714 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541713 +++$+++ 541713 +++$+++ 2008-07-05 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.215289380E09 +++$+++ Well, that was kind of you, thanks!  As it turns out, I am in fact a card carrying member of the American social experiment.   +++$+++ :Well, that was kind of you, thanks!  As it turns out, I am in fact a card carrying member of the American social experiment.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 13:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

17426 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-07 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.302234240E09 +++$+++ ...for your many article contributions and your charming userboxes.  +++$+++ ...for your many article contributions and your charming userboxes. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
17427 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17426 +++$+++ 17426 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.302234900E09 +++$+++ You just cheered my day :)) thanks! \u2014  +++$+++ :You just cheered my day :)) thanks! — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 20:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

279571 +++$+++ Hillman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-13 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.150247880E09 +++$+++ Just to be clear: do you disagree with the principle that the subject of a wikibiography should be discouraged from himself writing or rewriting his own wikibiography?   Please note that everyone appears to agree that the subject can contribute on the talk page to express concerns, suggest factual corrections, or describe changes he desires.  However, as I say, I think it is best if more neutral editors make any changes to the article itself. --- +++$+++ Just to be clear: do you disagree with the principle that the subject of a wikibiography should be discouraged from himself writing or rewriting his own wikibiography?   Please note that everyone appears to agree that the subject can contribute on the talk page to express concerns, suggest factual corrections, or describe changes he desires.  However, as I say, I think it is best if more neutral editors make any changes to the article itself. ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 18:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
279572 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279571 +++$+++ 279571 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.150251660E09 +++$+++ Hi Chris. I have no major disagreements with the guidelines set down in [[WP:AUTO]]. But I don't think we should prohibit an editor from making ''any'' edits at all. At any rate I have some concerns of my own about the [[Bernard Haisch]] article, as expressed on [[Talk:Bernard Haisch]]. Can you please respond to my talk page posts there? Thanks.  +++$+++ :Hi Chris. I have no major disagreements with the guidelines set down in [[WP:AUTO]]. But I don't think we should prohibit an editor from making ''any'' edits at all. At any rate I have some concerns of my own about the [[Bernard Haisch]] article, as expressed on [[Talk:Bernard Haisch]]. Can you please respond to my talk page posts there? Thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:21, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
279573 +++$+++ Hillman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279571 +++$+++ 279572 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.150252140E09 +++$+++ Huh?  I specifically said that I don't deny Haisch the right to suggest changes in the talk page.  And   of course he has the right to make edits to articles on topics which are not controversial ''or'' in which he is not ''directly invovled''.  I am saying that it would be best if he confine his participation regarding his own wikibio to the talk page, however.  Hope this is clear now.--- +++$+++ ::Huh?  I specifically said that I don't deny Haisch the right to suggest changes in the talk page.  And   of course he has the right to make edits to articles on topics which are not controversial ''or'' in which he is not ''directly invovled''.  I am saying that it would be best if he confine his participation regarding his own wikibio to the talk page, however.  Hope this is clear now.---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 19:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
279574 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279571 +++$+++ 279571 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.150252620E09 +++$+++ I meant any edits at all to [[Bernard Haisch]]. Anyway I don't think we really disagree about this. I'm perfectly happy to ask and encourage Haisch to refrain from editing that article, and as you suggest, instead make suggestions for changes on the talk page. However at the moment I'm really more concerned about the changes that ''I'' want to make to the article. Can you tell me why you have reverted the changes that I made to the article? Did you read my comments posted on the talk page first?  +++$+++ :I meant any edits at all to [[Bernard Haisch]]. Anyway I don't think we really disagree about this. I'm perfectly happy to ask and encourage Haisch to refrain from editing that article, and as you suggest, instead make suggestions for changes on the talk page. However at the moment I'm really more concerned about the changes that ''I'' want to make to the article. Can you tell me why you have reverted the changes that I made to the article? Did you read my comments posted on the talk page first? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

17428 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310333220E09 +++$+++ I gather you scrapped the Burma idea? I haven't heard from you in two months.\u2666  +++$+++ I gather you scrapped the Burma idea? I haven't heard from you in two months.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 14:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
17429 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17428 +++$+++ 17428 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.310334360E09 +++$+++ Cheers.  +++$+++ :Cheers. [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 14:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

17430 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.310332140E09 +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincluded-->  +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincluded--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 14:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
17431 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17430 +++$+++ 17430 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310332440E09 +++$+++ LOL! You cannot be serious! \u2014  +++$+++ :LOL! You cannot be serious! — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 14:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

279575 +++$+++ Haisch +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-13 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.150253220E09 +++$+++ Paul, please help. Hillman has taken down the Disputation banner. That should certainly be my right to display. This is inappropriate behaviour on Hillman's part. +++$+++ Paul, please help. Hillman has taken down the Disputation banner. That should certainly be my right to display. This is inappropriate behaviour on Hillman's part.[[User:Haisch|Haisch]] 19:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
279576 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279575 +++$+++ 279575 +++$+++ 2006-06-13 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.150253460E09 +++$+++ Well it's back now, and Chris has also added your postdoc info, so let's see what developes.  +++$+++ : Well it's back now, and Chris has also added your postdoc info, so let's see what developes. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

17432 +++$+++ Tjibbe I +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17432 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311865140E09 +++$+++ When you created [[Damer]], you included an interwiki link to <code><nowiki>[[<\/nowiki>[[fr:Damer]]<nowiki>]]<\/nowiki><\/code>. However, the page that you created is a list of people that share a surname, and the French article is about an island in South-Western Maluku, Indonesia. This caused a bot to add a wrong interwiki link to <code><nowiki>[[<\/nowiki>[[en:Damer]]<nowiki>]]<\/nowiki><\/code> on four wikipedias. Please be careful when including interwiki links in articles. Kalwedo,  +++$+++ When you created [[Damer]], you included an interwiki link to <code><nowiki>[[</nowiki>[[fr:Damer]]<nowiki>]]</nowiki></code>. However, the page that you created is a list of people that share a surname, and the French article is about an island in South-Western Maluku, Indonesia. This caused a bot to add a wrong interwiki link to <code><nowiki>[[</nowiki>[[en:Damer]]<nowiki>]]</nowiki></code> on four wikipedias. Please be careful when including interwiki links in articles. Kalwedo, [[User:Tjibbe I|Tjibbe I]] ([[User talk:Tjibbe I|talk]]) 07:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
17433 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17432 +++$+++ 17432 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311877560E09 +++$+++ Oops! Sorry about that. Must be more careful. \u2014  +++$+++ :Oops! Sorry about that. Must be more careful. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 11:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

279577 +++$+++ Haisch +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-14 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.150338300E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Haisch|Haisch]] 19:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
279578 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279577 +++$+++ 279577 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.150344540E09 +++$+++ Yes, and you are welcome.  +++$+++ :Yes, and you are welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

17434 +++$+++ Gurt Posh +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.312232940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the new dab page [[Magdy]]. Do you think we should included [[Magdi]] entries on there too, e.g. [[:Magdi Yacoub]]?  I believe it's a common alternate spelling.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks for the new dab page [[Magdy]]. Do you think we should included [[Magdi]] entries on there too, e.g. [[:Magdi Yacoub]]?  I believe it's a common alternate spelling.  Thanks, [[User:Gurt Posh|Gurt Posh]] ([[User talk:Gurt Posh|talk]]) 14:09, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
17435 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17434 +++$+++ 17434 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.312259160E09 +++$+++ Good idea. I've added them. Thanks for getting in touch. \u2014  +++$+++ :Good idea. I've added them. Thanks for getting in touch. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 21:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

483503 +++$+++ Shoyrudude555 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-12 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.192227540E09 +++$+++ Could you please enlighten me as to why you made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=next&oldid=163371931 this edit]? <span class=\"sigShoyrudude555\"><font color=\"royalblue\"> +++$+++ Could you please enlighten me as to why you made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=next&oldid=163371931 this edit]? <span class="sigShoyrudude555"><font color="royalblue">[[User:Shoyrudude555|shoy]]</font></span> 15:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
483504 +++$+++ Shoyrudude555 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483503 +++$+++ 483503 +++$+++ 2007-10-14 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.192431180E09 +++$+++ I don't know if you just missed this message or what, because you've apparently checked your talk page since I posted, so I'll post here again to draw your attention to it. <span class=\"sigShoyrudude555\"><font color=\"royalblue\"> +++$+++ :I don't know if you just missed this message or what, because you've apparently checked your talk page since I posted, so I'll post here again to draw your attention to it. <span class="sigShoyrudude555"><font color="royalblue">[[User:Shoyrudude555|shoy]]</font></span> 23:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
483505 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483503 +++$+++ 483504 +++$+++ 2007-10-14 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.192431480E09 +++$+++ I have no idea.  Most all of his articles from that day have been deleted and he has apparently been run off Wikipedia altogether now so the issue appears to be resolved.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::I have no idea.  Most all of his articles from that day have been deleted and he has apparently been run off Wikipedia altogether now so the issue appears to be resolved.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 23:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

17436 +++$+++ RASAM +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312426440E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:RASAM|RASAM]] ([[User talk:RASAM|talk]]) 19:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
17437 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ 17436 +++$+++ 17436 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312432860E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see. It was because \"leutenant\" was close to \"lieutenant\" that I \"corrected\" it in the wrong direction! Thanks for repairing the damage. \u2014  +++$+++ :Ah, I see. It was because "leutenant" was close to "lieutenant" that I "corrected" it in the wrong direction! Thanks for repairing the damage. — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides#top|talk]]) 21:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

279582 +++$+++ Haisch +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-19 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.150768800E09 +++$+++ By the way, have a look at the Discussion page of the Journal of Scientific Exploration by others than me and you will see further evidence of NPOV violation by Hillman. +++$+++ By the way, have a look at the Discussion page of the Journal of Scientific Exploration by others than me and you will see further evidence of NPOV violation by Hillman.[[User:Haisch|Haisch]] 19:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
279583 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279582 +++$+++ 279582 +++$+++ 2006-06-19 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.150777740E09 +++$+++ And again you are welcome. As far as I know [[User:Hillman|Hillman]] is [http:\/\/www.genealogy.ams.org\/html\/id.phtml?id=28250 this person], and is a \"he\". In any case Hilman goes by \"Chris\".  +++$+++ :And again you are welcome. As far as I know [[User:Hillman|Hillman]] is [http://www.genealogy.ams.org/html/id.phtml?id=28250 this person], and is a "he". In any case Hilman goes by "Chris". [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
279584 +++$+++ Hillman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279582 +++$+++ 279583 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.150882560E09 +++$+++ I can confirm that I am [http:\/\/www.genealogy.ams.org\/html\/id.phtml?id=28250 this mysterious entity], and that I generally go by \"Chris\" :-\/ --- +++$+++ ::I can confirm that I am [http://www.genealogy.ams.org/html/id.phtml?id=28250 this mysterious entity], and that I generally go by "Chris" :-/ ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 02:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

308741 +++$+++ DannyMuse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-01 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.217641620E09 +++$+++ Given Dawkins' high profile in this controversy, it should be informative to watch and see how he currently uses the terms: Darwinism, evolution and natural-selection. Enjoy! -  +++$+++ Given Dawkins' high profile in this controversy, it should be informative to watch and see how he currently uses the terms: Darwinism, evolution and natural-selection. Enjoy! - [[User:DannyMuse|DannyMuse]] ([[User talk:DannyMuse|talk]]) 18:47, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
308742 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308741 +++$+++ 308741 +++$+++ 2008-08-01 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.217645940E09 +++$+++ Excellent, thanks for the heads-up. I'd probably have missed it as I'm rather allergic to adverts and didn't even realise that there are two Channel 4s now. Interestingly, the title now appears to be ''The Genius of Charles Darwin''. So that's the viddy set, something to look forward to. . .  +++$+++ :Excellent, thanks for the heads-up. I'd probably have missed it as I'm rather allergic to adverts and didn't even realise that there are two Channel 4s now. Interestingly, the title now appears to be ''The Genius of Charles Darwin''. So that's the viddy set, something to look forward to. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
308743 +++$+++ DannyMuse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308741 +++$+++ 308742 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.217755560E09 +++$+++ BTW, I watched a [http:\/\/richarddawkins.net\/article,2925,n,n clip] of the show on Richard Dawkins' page and it both begins and ends discussing \"evolution\". Not surprising, but the association is interesting to note. --   +++$+++ ::BTW, I watched a [http://richarddawkins.net/article,2925,n,n clip] of the show on Richard Dawkins' page and it both begins and ends discussing "evolution". Not surprising, but the association is interesting to note. --  [[User:DannyMuse|DannyMuse]] ([[User talk:DannyMuse|talk]]) 02:26, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

541728 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-04 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.217905440E09 +++$+++ See the edit history on [[Stellaris]] - that should make it clear.  Rather than edit war with [[User:Seraphimblade]] over it, I decided to just recreate it at [[Stellaris (comics)]].  I'd kindly like to request that you please leave that first one the way it is, as the new one is likely to become a target of deletion if we touch the redirect again.  +++$+++ See the edit history on [[Stellaris]] - that should make it clear.  Rather than edit war with [[User:Seraphimblade]] over it, I decided to just recreate it at [[Stellaris (comics)]].  I'd kindly like to request that you please leave that first one the way it is, as the new one is likely to become a target of deletion if we touch the redirect again. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 20:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
541729 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541728 +++$+++ 541728 +++$+++ 2008-08-04 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.217907000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up.  I hadn't noticed that.   +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up.  I hadn't noticed that.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 20:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
541730 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541728 +++$+++ 541729 +++$+++ 2008-08-04 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.217907600E09 +++$+++ No problem.  :) Did you see the additional notes on the project talk page about the rest of those books from the 70s?  +++$+++ ::No problem.  :) Did you see the additional notes on the project talk page about the rest of those books from the 70s? [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 20:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
541731 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541728 +++$+++ 541730 +++$+++ 2008-08-04 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.217910780E09 +++$+++ I did, but there's only so much room in my \"reference material for Wikipedia\" budget!   +++$+++ :::I did, but there's only so much room in my "reference material for Wikipedia" budget!  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 21:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
541732 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541728 +++$+++ 541731 +++$+++ 2008-08-04 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.217911260E09 +++$+++ LOL, but those are useful in general.  :)  +++$+++ ::::LOL, but those are useful in general.  :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 21:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

279586 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279586 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-22 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.151008620E09 +++$+++ I don't want to edit [[Talk:Proof that 0.999... equals 1#Geometric series proof|your words]], but the nickname for Humphrey Bogart is \"[[Humphrey Bogart#Early career in the theater|Bogie]]\", not \"[[Boogie]]\". Makes a difference!  :-)  -- +++$+++ I don't want to edit [[Talk:Proof that 0.999... equals 1#Geometric series proof|your words]], but the nickname for Humphrey Bogart is "[[Humphrey Bogart#Early career in the theater|Bogie]]", not "[[Boogie]]". Makes a difference!  :-)  --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 13:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
279587 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279586 +++$+++ 279586 +++$+++ 2006-06-22 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.151014080E09 +++$+++ Yes quite! ;-)  +++$+++ :Yes quite! ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:08, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

17443 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17443 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-16 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.253120340E09 +++$+++ As you can see I was blocked for a period of 48 hours by [[User: Backslash Forwardslash| Backslash Forwardslash]] (after I I applied to the Administrators' noticeboard on Edit warring against two other users) for violeting the 3RR and after I was warned by him following a complain by [[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] who one hand with [[User:Anonymous Dissident|Anonymous Dissident]] revert my edits on the first paragraph of [[Quark]]s article history section for at least 5 times in one day after I provided appropriate sources that indicate factual mistakes in this section. [[User:Anonymous Dissident|Anonymous Dissident]] delete the sources without even reviewing them first. In the original version it was written that [[Yuval Ne'eman]] suggested the [[eightfold way]] in 1962 and Gall Mann suggested it in the Early 1960s. I also provided sources that indicated that the Eightfold way as proposed by Ne'eman most probably lead to the subsequent Quark Model. These arguments are sourced well by virtually all high profile references available on this matter. As I wrote, my edits were revert, on the talk page I was facing impermeability and only shortly before I applied to the Administrators' noticeboard on Edit warring [[User:Anonymous Dissident|Anonymous Dissident]] was willing to accept that Ne'eman proposed the eightfold model in 1961 but unwilling to change the wording of \"early 1960s\" (for Gall Mann) to 1961 (as all sources explicitly stated. Also, Headbomb found that adding the fact that Ne'eman was considerd as the one who exposed the quark model by the [[Technion]] as one which is not noteworthy (even if sourced well) and remove it without discussion. I think that my blocked by [[User: Backslash Forwardslash| Backslash Forwardslash]]is wrong, that the blocking for 48 hours is too long anyway and that my arguments were ignored. Would be thankful for any help on this.-- +++$+++ As you can see I was blocked for a period of 48 hours by [[User: Backslash Forwardslash| Backslash Forwardslash]] (after I I applied to the Administrators' noticeboard on Edit warring against two other users) for violeting the 3RR and after I was warned by him following a complain by [[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] who one hand with [[User:Anonymous Dissident|Anonymous Dissident]] revert my edits on the first paragraph of [[Quark]]s article history section for at least 5 times in one day after I provided appropriate sources that indicate factual mistakes in this section. [[User:Anonymous Dissident|Anonymous Dissident]] delete the sources without even reviewing them first. In the original version it was written that [[Yuval Ne'eman]] suggested the [[eightfold way]] in 1962 and Gall Mann suggested it in the Early 1960s. I also provided sources that indicated that the Eightfold way as proposed by Ne'eman most probably lead to the subsequent Quark Model. These arguments are sourced well by virtually all high profile references available on this matter. As I wrote, my edits were revert, on the talk page I was facing impermeability and only shortly before I applied to the Administrators' noticeboard on Edit warring [[User:Anonymous Dissident|Anonymous Dissident]] was willing to accept that Ne'eman proposed the eightfold model in 1961 but unwilling to change the wording of "early 1960s" (for Gall Mann) to 1961 (as all sources explicitly stated. Also, Headbomb found that adding the fact that Ne'eman was considerd as the one who exposed the quark model by the [[Technion]] as one which is not noteworthy (even if sourced well) and remove it without discussion. I think that my blocked by [[User: Backslash Forwardslash| Backslash Forwardslash]]is wrong, that the blocking for 48 hours is too long anyway and that my arguments were ignored. Would be thankful for any help on this.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 09:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
17444 +++$+++  +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17443 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.253136900E09 +++$+++ It's not that your arguments were ignored, it's that we disagreed about how to present content. You took issue with the dates (and this lead to the correction from 1962 --> 1961 for Ne'emann), and the sourcing, (and this lead to the addition of 3\/5 references) for that passage, you objected to explicitely saying Ne'eman didn't developp the quark model (and this lead to a rewording of the section). Where disagreeing about giving the specific date for Gell-Mann's because (and I'm speaking for myself here) Gell-Mann's ''Eightfold Way'' idea was not published in journals, but rather made its way trough internal documents from Caltech's Synchrotron Laboratory, printed in 1961, 1962, and 1964. Second, regarding Technion's view of Ne'emann, that is ''by far'' not a [[WP:NPOV|mainstream POV]], and to report that here is to give [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]]. The quark model is from Gell-Mann and Zweig. It rests on the ''Eightfold Way'' from Gell-Mann and Ne'emann. That Ne'emann didn't receive a Nobel prize for his work is not something that needs to be explicitely noted, we report those that did win it.  +++$+++ ::It's not that your arguments were ignored, it's that we disagreed about how to present content. You took issue with the dates (and this lead to the correction from 1962 --> 1961 for Ne'emann), and the sourcing, (and this lead to the addition of 3/5 references) for that passage, you objected to explicitely saying Ne'eman didn't developp the quark model (and this lead to a rewording of the section). Where disagreeing about giving the specific date for Gell-Mann's because (and I'm speaking for myself here) Gell-Mann's ''Eightfold Way'' idea was not published in journals, but rather made its way trough internal documents from Caltech's Synchrotron Laboratory, printed in 1961, 1962, and 1964. Second, regarding Technion's view of Ne'emann, that is ''by far'' not a [[WP:NPOV|mainstream POV]], and to report that here is to give [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]]. The quark model is from Gell-Mann and Zweig. It rests on the ''Eightfold Way'' from Gell-Mann and Ne'emann. That Ne'emann didn't receive a Nobel prize for his work is not something that needs to be explicitely noted, we report those that did win it. [[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]]&nbsp;{<sup>[[User talk:Headbomb|ταλκ]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|κοντριβς]]</sub>&nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;[[WP:PHYS|WP Physics]]} 14:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
17445 +++$+++  +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17443 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.253137200E09 +++$+++ And on a [[WP:CIVIL|general note]], in the future you should probably refrain from calling the main authors of an article that get featured on the front page [[WP:VAND|vandals]], and likening their contributions to people who come in and write \"PENIS!11\" all over the place.  +++$+++ :::And on a [[WP:CIVIL|general note]], in the future you should probably refrain from calling the main authors of an article that get featured on the front page [[WP:VAND|vandals]], and likening their contributions to people who come in and write "PENIS!11" all over the place. [[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]]&nbsp;{<sup>[[User talk:Headbomb|ταλκ]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|κοντριβς]]</sub>&nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;[[WP:PHYS|WP Physics]]} 14:40, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
17446 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17443 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.253138820E09 +++$+++ I'm not telling that we should enter it right now (the Technion issue) or ever, I accept that we should discuss it. So, if you want I'm willing to start new discussion in a more constructive fashion, without edit wars, warnings and etc. Just help me to lift this annoying blocked, as you can see my request to lift it was declined on 14:35.-- +++$+++ :::::I'm not telling that we should enter it right now (the Technion issue) or ever, I accept that we should discuss it. So, if you want I'm willing to start new discussion in a more constructive fashion, without edit wars, warnings and etc. Just help me to lift this annoying blocked, as you can see my request to lift it was declined on 14:35.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 15:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
17447 +++$+++ Anonymous Dissident +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17443 +++$+++ 17443 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.253139840E09 +++$+++ Gilisa, we can continue to discuss this matter until the cows come home, but the fact of the matter is that what you are trying to insert goes against what is neutral and what is common scientific opinion. That will never change. I see no reason to continue discussing this tiny piece of phraseology.  Ne'eman's contribution is not ignored in the article \u2013 but your version ''over-emphasises'' it. The Technion's view is not in agreement with mainstream opinion. And no we would not listen to \"Harvard or MIT\" if they said something different; that's a silly proposition. What is outside of the norm is outside of the norm, and does not belong in a neutral encyclopedia \u2013 regardless of who said it. This is the last thing I will be saying on this matter. If you are still unsatisfied, I suggest you solicit the opinions of the article's other main contributors ([[User:TimothyRias]], [[User:A. di M.]], [[User:Markus Poessel]]), with the precondition that you accept the consensus. I'm almost certain that they will agree with us. I hope our future interactions, if we should meet again, are more positive. Best, \u2014<strong> +++$+++ *Gilisa, we can continue to discuss this matter until the cows come home, but the fact of the matter is that what you are trying to insert goes against what is neutral and what is common scientific opinion. That will never change. I see no reason to continue discussing this tiny piece of phraseology.  Ne'eman's contribution is not ignored in the article – but your version ''over-emphasises'' it. The Technion's view is not in agreement with mainstream opinion. And no we would not listen to "Harvard or MIT" if they said something different; that's a silly proposition. What is outside of the norm is outside of the norm, and does not belong in a neutral encyclopedia – regardless of who said it. This is the last thing I will be saying on this matter. If you are still unsatisfied, I suggest you solicit the opinions of the article's other main contributors ([[User:TimothyRias]], [[User:A. di M.]], [[User:Markus Poessel]]), with the precondition that you accept the consensus. I'm almost certain that they will agree with us. I hope our future interactions, if we should meet again, are more positive. Best, —<strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 15:24, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
17448 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17443 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.253140680E09 +++$+++ BTW, you may find this link interesting  [http:\/\/calteches.library.caltech.edu\/237\/1\/whitlock.pdf]-- +++$+++ :::BTW, you may find this link interesting  [http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/237/1/whitlock.pdf]--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 15:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
17449 +++$+++  +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17443 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.253142420E09 +++$+++ We can't \"lift the block\" since we're not admins (at least I'm not, don't know about AD). As far as placing Ne'eman and Gell-Mann in the same sentence, I have no \"real\" objection\", but I'm opposed to giving a specific date for Gell-Mann. Which in turns makes it very hard to fit all of the information in one sentence without the sentence growing too long to be easily read.  +++$+++ ::::We can't "lift the block" since we're not admins (at least I'm not, don't know about AD). As far as placing Ne'eman and Gell-Mann in the same sentence, I have no "real" objection", but I'm opposed to giving a specific date for Gell-Mann. Which in turns makes it very hard to fit all of the information in one sentence without the sentence growing too long to be easily read. [[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]]&nbsp;{<sup>[[User talk:Headbomb|ταλκ]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|κοντριβς]]</sub>&nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;[[WP:PHYS|WP Physics]]} 16:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
17450 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17443 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.253142780E09 +++$+++ I know you don't, but you can contact the one who cast it on me-I can't. Now the all issue look to me more like a storm in a cup of tea (but still I think they should be mentioned in the same sentence. As for the year-there are pleanty of sources, why do you refuse? You may word it that they both formulate it in the early 1960s) :)-- +++$+++ :::::I know you don't, but you can contact the one who cast it on me-I can't. Now the all issue look to me more like a storm in a cup of tea (but still I think they should be mentioned in the same sentence. As for the year-there are pleanty of sources, why do you refuse? You may word it that they both formulate it in the early 1960s) :)--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 16:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

279588 +++$+++ Celestianpower +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279588 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-23 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.151103600E09 +++$+++ Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, &mdash;[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color=\"green\">[[User:Celestianpower\/Esperanza|es]]<\/font> +++$+++ Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, &mdash;[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]<font color="green">[[User:Celestianpower/Esperanza|es]]</font>[[User:Celestianpower|tianpower]] <sup>[[user talk:Celestianpower|háblame]]</sup> 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
279589 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279588 +++$+++ 279588 +++$+++ 2006-06-23 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.151105580E09 +++$+++ Short and criptic. ;-)  +++$+++ :Short and criptic. ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
279590 +++$+++ Misza13 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279588 +++$+++ 279589 +++$+++ 2006-06-23 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.151106300E09 +++$+++ Yeah, sorry. ;-p Fixed now. I'll deal with the bot later...  +++$+++ ::Yeah, sorry. ;-p Fixed now. I'll deal with the bot later... [[User:Misza13|Misza]][[WP:ESP|<span style="color:green">'''13'''</span>]] <sup><u>'''[[User talk:Misza13|T]] [[Special:Contributions/Misza13|C]]'''</u></sup> 16:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
279591 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279588 +++$+++ 279590 +++$+++ 2006-06-23 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.151106780E09 +++$+++ I've had some experience with unruly bots. It's tragic: ''When Bots Go Bad''. &mdash;  +++$+++ :::I've had some experience with unruly bots. It's tragic: ''When Bots Go Bad''. &mdash; [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

541734 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541734 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-08 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.218233340E09 +++$+++ Weren't you going to do something with this? IIRC, you proposed two more categories. Thoughts?  +++$+++ Weren't you going to do something with this? IIRC, you proposed two more categories. Thoughts? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 15:09, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
541735 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541734 +++$+++ 541734 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.218494280E09 +++$+++ Did you read this thread?  +++$+++ :Did you read this thread? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 15:38, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
541736 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541734 +++$+++ 541735 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.218495300E09 +++$+++ I read it.  I am currently engaged elsewhere, but I will try to get to this as soon as I can.  Thanks for checking.   +++$+++ ::I read it.  I am currently engaged elsewhere, but I will try to get to this as soon as I can.  Thanks for checking.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 15:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
541737 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541734 +++$+++ 541736 +++$+++ 2008-09-06 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.220701680E09 +++$+++ Almost a month has passed. You still up for it?  +++$+++ :::Almost a month has passed. You still up for it? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 04:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
541738 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541734 +++$+++ 541737 +++$+++ 2008-09-08 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.220942820E09 +++$+++ Busy month for me.  I run a college bookstore, so it's been a while since I've had two seconds to rub together.  Still on my back burner, sorry.   +++$+++ ::::Busy month for me.  I run a college bookstore, so it's been a while since I've had two seconds to rub together.  Still on my back burner, sorry.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 23:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

565312 +++$+++ Edgar181 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ 565312 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-26 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.233026820E09 +++$+++ There is a double bond missing in the heterocyclic ring in [[:Image:Cefroxadine.svg]].  Can you please fix it?  Thanks.  -- +++$+++ There is a double bond missing in the heterocyclic ring in [[:Image:Cefroxadine.svg]].  Can you please fix it?  Thanks.  --[[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 19:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
565313 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ 565312 +++$+++ 565312 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.233028860E09 +++$+++ {{tick|18}} '''Done''', that was odd. I'm trying out a new method of generating SVGs (export to PDF \u2192 import to Inkscape, obviates the need for exporting twice) and something must have gone awry. Thanks for noticing! +++$+++ :{{tick|18}} '''Done''', that was odd. I'm trying out a new method of generating SVGs (export to PDF → import to Inkscape, obviates the need for exporting twice) and something must have gone awry. Thanks for noticing![[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small>20:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

279592 +++$+++ JPD +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.152309120E09 +++$+++ I see that I typed an extra ~ at [[Talk:Mathematics]]. Thanks for fixing it for me.  +++$+++ I see that I typed an extra ~ at [[Talk:Mathematics]]. Thanks for fixing it for me. [[User:JPD|JPD]] ([[User talk:JPD|talk]]) 14:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
279593 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279592 +++$+++ 279592 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.152311640E09 +++$+++ You're welcome, we all do it ;-)  +++$+++ :You're welcome, we all do it ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

279594 +++$+++ KaIki +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279594 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-09 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.152441720E09 +++$+++ Stop vandalising over on wikiquote.  +++$+++ Stop vandalising over on wikiquote. [[User:KaIki|KaIki]] 03:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
279595 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279594 +++$+++ 279594 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.152442140E09 +++$+++ Hard to stop when I've never started ;-) You must have me confused with someone else ;-)  I've never edited on wikiquote.  +++$+++ :Hard to stop when I've never started ;-) You must have me confused with someone else ;-)  I've never edited on wikiquote. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
279596 +++$+++ KaIki +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279594 +++$+++ 279595 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.152442680E09 +++$+++ Well, someone must have stole your account, have a look.  +++$+++ ::Well, someone must have stole your account, have a look. [[User:KaIki|KaIki]] 03:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
279597 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279594 +++$+++ 279596 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.152442800E09 +++$+++ Yes I saw, Thanks for blocking that account. Makes me think I should open a dummy account on all our \"sister\" projects.  +++$+++ :::Yes I saw, Thanks for blocking that account. Makes me think I should open a dummy account on all our "sister" projects. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:00, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
279598 +++$+++ Kalki +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279594 +++$+++ 279594 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.152447180E09 +++$+++ The above messages were made by an impersonator who has created a user name using an uppercase \"I\" to appear like the lowercase \"L\" in my username. This vandal seems intent on being a pathetic nuisance here and on other projects, is to some extent associated with the IP [[User:216.164.203.90|216.164.203.90]], and seems to take an infantile delight in devising childish hoaxes: vandalizing pages under various usernames and deceiving people with feigned sincerity about problems being caused under others. ~  +++$+++ : The above messages were made by an impersonator who has created a user name using an uppercase "I" to appear like the lowercase "L" in my username. This vandal seems intent on being a pathetic nuisance here and on other projects, is to some extent associated with the IP [[User:216.164.203.90|216.164.203.90]], and seems to take an infantile delight in devising childish hoaxes: vandalizing pages under various usernames and deceiving people with feigned sincerity about problems being caused under others. ~ [[User:Kalki|Kalki]] 05:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
279599 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279594 +++$+++ 279596 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.152449100E09 +++$+++ Ah, more convoluted than I thought ;-)  +++$+++ :::Ah, more convoluted than I thought ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
279600 +++$+++ Lethe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279594 +++$+++ 279598 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 05:16:00 +++$+++ 1.152447360E09 +++$+++ I have blocked [[User:KaIki]]. - +++$+++ ::I have blocked [[User:KaIki]]. -[[User:Lethe/sig|lethe]] <sup>[[User talk:Lethe/sig|talk]] [{{fullurl:User talk:Lethe|action=edit&section=new}} +]</sup> 05:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
279601 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279594 +++$+++ 279600 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.152448920E09 +++$+++ Thanks Lethe, and thanks for signing for me (twice!) over at [[User talk:Hillman]] ;-)  +++$+++ :::Thanks Lethe, and thanks for signing for me (twice!) over at [[User talk:Hillman]] ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

541739 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-11 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.218493740E09 +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]].  +++$+++ This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 15:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
541740 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541739 +++$+++ 541739 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.218494160E09 +++$+++ It is a work in progress, robot, but thanks!   +++$+++ :It is a work in progress, robot, but thanks!  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 15:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
541741 +++$+++ Toon05 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541739 +++$+++ 541740 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.218498960E09 +++$+++ Hey, please use the \"move\" tool to move articles to new titles, as that preserves the legally-required user attribution in the page history. Cut-and-paste moves don't keep the history and therefore violate GFDL license. Thanks! -  <span style=\"font-family:Hobo Std.; font-size:12px; \">''' +++$+++ ::Hey, please use the "move" tool to move articles to new titles, as that preserves the legally-required user attribution in the page history. Cut-and-paste moves don't keep the history and therefore violate GFDL license. Thanks! -  <span style="font-family:Hobo Std.; font-size:12px; ">'''[[User:Toon05|<span style="color:#082567">Toon</span>]]'''<sup>'''[[User talk:Toon05|<span style="color:#082567">05</span>]]'''</sup></span> 16:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
541742 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541739 +++$+++ 541741 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.218499080E09 +++$+++ I knew that.  The only explanation I can offer for not having done it that way ... perhaps I had a brief, otherwise unnoticed brain aneurysm.  I can't think of any other reason.   +++$+++ :::I knew that.  The only explanation I can offer for not having done it that way ... perhaps I had a brief, otherwise unnoticed brain aneurysm.  I can't think of any other reason.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 16:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

17455 +++$+++ Feketekave +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17455 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-28 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.254189780E09 +++$+++ I have nothing against you and believe that you hold your ideas sincerely.  +++$+++ I have nothing against you and believe that you hold your ideas sincerely. [[User:Feketekave|Feketekave]] ([[User talk:Feketekave|talk]]) 19:03, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
17456 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17455 +++$+++ 17455 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.254189900E09 +++$+++ Fine. I'm not vindictive and even if I get it hard to understand your arguments I still willing to give it a new start and to make more efforts to understand your point of view. Do you wish us to restart? -- +++$+++ : Fine. I'm not vindictive and even if I get it hard to understand your arguments I still willing to give it a new start and to make more efforts to understand your point of view. Do you wish us to restart? --[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 19:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

17457 +++$+++ Feketekave +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-28 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.254190080E09 +++$+++ My arguments are clearly stated, though you may find them unusual. I see little point in starting a discussion between two editors alone at this point. Please take a look at how you interact with other editors in general.  +++$+++ My arguments are clearly stated, though you may find them unusual. I see little point in starting a discussion between two editors alone at this point. Please take a look at how you interact with other editors in general. [[User:Feketekave|Feketekave]] ([[User talk:Feketekave|talk]]) 19:08, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
17458 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17457 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.254190920E09 +++$+++ Well, I guess that that at least I tried to start over. But you are right, I realy don't see how we can get to an agreement and I can't find any exaggeration in my arguments. However, I'm not interested in long lasting conflicts even if I see myself right, and this is the case. I will take your advise to discuss issues with other editors.-- +++$+++ ::Well, I guess that that at least I tried to start over. But you are right, I realy don't see how we can get to an agreement and I can't find any exaggeration in my arguments. However, I'm not interested in long lasting conflicts even if I see myself right, and this is the case. I will take your advise to discuss issues with other editors.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 19:22, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

17459 +++$+++ Feketekave +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-28 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.254191040E09 +++$+++ I hope it is clear that I am accepting your offer of goodwill and \"peace\".  +++$+++ I hope it is clear that I am accepting your offer of goodwill and "peace". [[User:Feketekave|Feketekave]] ([[User talk:Feketekave|talk]]) 19:24, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
17460 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17459 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.254191160E09 +++$+++ I wasn't sure about that, but this is the most important part. I hope that if we  \"meet\" on other issues we will discuss them with clean minds and without remembering the past. Cheers-- +++$+++ ::I wasn't sure about that, but this is the most important part. I hope that if we  "meet" on other issues we will discuss them with clean minds and without remembering the past. Cheers--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 19:26, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

17462 +++$+++ Pob1984 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-05 09:36:00 +++$+++ 1.254760560E09 +++$+++ Dear Gilisa, I understand and appreciate your arguments for non-inlusion of this information ''as fact'' due to its political nature\/implications; however, can you concede that the Telegraph is not a tabloid? I would argue that it is a respected news source: neither is its article overly sensationalist: its ''suggests'' that M.A. ''could'' have been born a Jew due to his surname, and not that he was acually born a Jew and converted. Thats not how Tabloids write articles. Nonetheless, it is but one source, more are needed. Kind regards,  +++$+++ Dear Gilisa, I understand and appreciate your arguments for non-inlusion of this information ''as fact'' due to its political nature/implications; however, can you concede that the Telegraph is not a tabloid? I would argue that it is a respected news source: neither is its article overly sensationalist: its ''suggests'' that M.A. ''could'' have been born a Jew due to his surname, and not that he was acually born a Jew and converted. Thats not how Tabloids write articles. Nonetheless, it is but one source, more are needed. Kind regards, [[User:Pob1984|Pob1984]] ([[User talk:Pob1984|talk]]) 09:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
17463 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17462 +++$+++ 17462 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.254761160E09 +++$+++ Reply on your talk page.-- +++$+++ :Reply on your talk page.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 09:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
17464 +++$+++ ADM +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17462 +++$+++ 17463 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 10:33:00 +++$+++ 1.254763980E09 +++$+++ In any case, there is a fairly recent press article from ''The Guardian'' that attempts to refute ''The Telegraph'''s  allegations, so there is maybe a point into what user:Gilisa and others are saying. Until there is a greater consensus among Wikipedians, as well as among journalists and experts, I would not be very supportive of including such public assertions. Also, I have the impression that certain Jews in Israel and elsewhere feel uncomfortable with these allegations, because it gives antisemites a new reason for criticizing them, with the notion that they are needlessly picking on one of their own. [http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/commentisfree\/2009\/oct\/05\/mahmoud-ahmadinejad-jewish-family]  +++$+++ ::In any case, there is a fairly recent press article from ''The Guardian'' that attempts to refute ''The Telegraph'''s  allegations, so there is maybe a point into what user:Gilisa and others are saying. Until there is a greater consensus among Wikipedians, as well as among journalists and experts, I would not be very supportive of including such public assertions. Also, I have the impression that certain Jews in Israel and elsewhere feel uncomfortable with these allegations, because it gives antisemites a new reason for criticizing them, with the notion that they are needlessly picking on one of their own. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/oct/05/mahmoud-ahmadinejad-jewish-family] [[User:ADM|ADM]] ([[User talk:ADM|talk]]) 10:33, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

308745 +++$+++ JoshuaZ +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-08 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.218261720E09 +++$+++ That seems to be a highly reasonable solution to the issue there. My thanks.  +++$+++ That seems to be a highly reasonable solution to the issue there. My thanks. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] ([[User talk:JoshuaZ|talk]]) 23:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
308746 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308745 +++$+++ 308745 +++$+++ 2008-08-08 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.218262800E09 +++$+++ No problem, I just don't like \"criticism sections\". If someone can check out the other sources, there's probably a fair amount of positive stuff about him in these stories. . .  +++$+++ :No problem, I just don't like "criticism sections". If someone can check out the other sources, there's probably a fair amount of positive stuff about him in these stories. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 23:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

279608 +++$+++ Mike 7 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279608 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.153306440E09 +++$+++ {{First Edit Day}}  +++$+++ {{First Edit Day}} [[User:Mike 7|Michael]] 03:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
279609 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279608 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.153306560E09 +++$+++ Now I have two cakes, one for each year ;-)  +++$+++ ::Now I have two cakes, one for each year ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
279610 +++$+++ Mike 7 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279608 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.153307040E09 +++$+++ Well, that's good, then. :)  +++$+++ :::Well, that's good, then. :) [[User:Mike 7|Michael]] 04:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
279611 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279608 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.153307280E09 +++$+++ I'll eat one now save the other one for later ;-)  +++$+++ ::::I'll eat one now save the other one for later ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:08, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

541754 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-07 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.223405340E09 +++$+++ I am kindly asking you to re-evaluate the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Origen]], which you earlier closed as \"No consensus\".  Most votes seemed to unambiguously support deletion of the current disambiguation page to make room to move [[Origen of Alexandria]] back to [[Origen]], and a move of the current content of [[Origen of Alexandria]] to [[Origen (disambiguation)]].  The \"keep\" votes either gave no reason, never mind one based in [[WP:MOS]], or demurred on procedural grounds that this was a matter for [[WP:Requested moves]], not AfD.  If it is indeed what you feel as well, I'd have appreciated you saying that in your closing assessment, particularly so I know whether to take it there instead of deletion review.  But I don't think \"no consensus\" entirely reflected the discussion.  Cheers.   +++$+++ I am kindly asking you to re-evaluate the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Origen]], which you earlier closed as "No consensus".  Most votes seemed to unambiguously support deletion of the current disambiguation page to make room to move [[Origen of Alexandria]] back to [[Origen]], and a move of the current content of [[Origen of Alexandria]] to [[Origen (disambiguation)]].  The "keep" votes either gave no reason, never mind one based in [[WP:MOS]], or demurred on procedural grounds that this was a matter for [[WP:Requested moves]], not AfD.  If it is indeed what you feel as well, I'd have appreciated you saying that in your closing assessment, particularly so I know whether to take it there instead of deletion review.  But I don't think "no consensus" entirely reflected the discussion.  Cheers.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud|talk]]) 11:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
541755 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541754 +++$+++ 541754 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.223408100E09 +++$+++ AFD has two outcomes, either delete or not-delete. I felt that there was no consensus to delete the page, and closed as such. Whether the page should be edited, moved, disambiguated, etc. is not a matter for AFD, and you are free (I think) to make the moves that you suggest as a normal editorial action.  +++$+++ :AFD has two outcomes, either delete or not-delete. I felt that there was no consensus to delete the page, and closed as such. Whether the page should be edited, moved, disambiguated, etc. is not a matter for AFD, and you are free (I think) to make the moves that you suggest as a normal editorial action. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 12:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

17467 +++$+++ Edison +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-04 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.257377100E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] I noticed that you have posted comments {{#if:User talk:Flayer|to the page [[:User talk:Flayer]]}} in a language other than English.  When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments.  For more details, see [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Good practice|Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-english -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] I noticed that you have posted comments {{#if:User talk:Flayer|to the page [[:User talk:Flayer]]}} in a language other than English.  When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments.  For more details, see [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Good practice|Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-english --> [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 15:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
17468 +++$+++ Edison +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17467 +++$+++ 17467 +++$+++ 2009-11-04 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.257385140E09 +++$+++ See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Flayer&diff=318247952&oldid=318246183]. Since it was 4 weeks ago, please just consider the notice as information for future communications. Thanks.  +++$+++ :See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Flayer&diff=318247952&oldid=318246183]. Since it was 4 weeks ago, please just consider the notice as information for future communications. Thanks. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 17:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

279612 +++$+++ Ladybirdintheuk +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279612 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 06:44:00 +++$+++ 1.153316640E09 +++$+++ (have a third - you can share it with your friends :) ) - +++$+++ (have a third - you can share it with your friends :) ) -[[User:Ladybirdintheuk|Ladybirdintheuk]] 06:44, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
279613 +++$+++ Mr. Turcotte +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279612 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.153359180E09 +++$+++ Congrats on your first edit day! Enjoy your many cakes.  +++$+++ :::::Congrats on your first edit day! Enjoy your many cakes. [[User:Mr. Turcotte|<font color="Black">'''Mr. Turcotte'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mr. Turcotte|'''<font color="navy">''talk''</font>''']]</sup> 18:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
279614 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279612 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.153359360E09 +++$+++ Thanks all, going to get fat (er fatter).  +++$+++ ::::: Thanks all, going to get fat (er fatter). [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

541757 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541757 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-07 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.223428320E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Cheetah_(comics)&diff=243671819&oldid=243671279 this], shouldn't we categorize articles by only the first debut? I know [[WP:ANIME]] has a guideline for something like this, but I'm not sure what [[WP:CMC]] says about it. Thoughts?  +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cheetah_(comics)&diff=243671819&oldid=243671279 this], shouldn't we categorize articles by only the first debut? I know [[WP:ANIME]] has a guideline for something like this, but I'm not sure what [[WP:CMC]] says about it. Thoughts? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 18:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
541758 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541757 +++$+++ 541757 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.223430000E09 +++$+++ Replied at your talkpage.   +++$+++ :Replied at your talkpage.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 18:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
541759 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541757 +++$+++ 541758 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.223430060E09 +++$+++ I did not receive anything. Are you sure you did it right?  +++$+++ ::I did not receive anything. Are you sure you did it right? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 18:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
541760 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541757 +++$+++ 541759 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.223430660E09 +++$+++ Gimme a sec!  Sheesh!   +++$+++ :::Gimme a sec!  Sheesh!  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 18:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
541761 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541757 +++$+++ 541760 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.223430960E09 +++$+++ Whoa man, you didn't have to bite my head off! Thought something happened there. Anyways, how would it be for a case like [[Superman]]'s?  +++$+++ ::::Whoa man, you didn't have to bite my head off! Thought something happened there. Anyways, how would it be for a case like [[Superman]]'s? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 18:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
541762 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541757 +++$+++ 541761 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.223432280E09 +++$+++ I sort of see what you mean. Any other examples of multiple comic debuts I should be aware of?  +++$+++ :::::I sort of see what you mean. Any other examples of multiple comic debuts I should be aware of? [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 19:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
541763 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541757 +++$+++ 541762 +++$+++ 2008-10-07 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.223433000E09 +++$+++ Categorizing redirects seems like the best idea, and [[WP:CAT-RD]] seems to agree. Well, thank you Fordmadoxfraud for all your help. See you around,  +++$+++ ::::::Categorizing redirects seems like the best idea, and [[WP:CAT-RD]] seems to agree. Well, thank you Fordmadoxfraud for all your help. See you around, [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 19:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

17470 +++$+++ A Sniper +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-15 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.258341000E09 +++$+++ \u05d0\u05d9\u05df \u05d1\u05e2\u05d9\u05d5\u05ea   +++$+++ אין בעיות  [[User:A Sniper|A Sniper]] ([[User talk:A Sniper|talk]]) 19:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
17471 +++$+++ A Sniper +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17470 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-16 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.258381560E09 +++$+++ .\u05d0\u05e0\u05d9 \u05d9\u05d4\u05d5\u05d3\u05d9, \u05dc\u05db\u05df \u05d4\u05e2\u05d1\u05e8\u05d9\u05ea. \u05db\u05dc \u05d4\u05db\u05d9 \u05d8\u05d5\u05d1.  +++$+++ ::.אני יהודי, לכן העברית. כל הכי טוב. [[User:A Sniper|A Sniper]] ([[User talk:A Sniper|talk]]) 06:26, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

279615 +++$+++ 64.110.251.69 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279615 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.153303860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:64.110.251.69|64.110.251.69]] 03:11, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
279616 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279615 +++$+++ 279615 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.153304460E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I was on \"vandalism patrol\" reviewing hundreds of IP edits. Your edit, via a quick glance, looked like valdalism, since you deleted a large amount of content with no edit summary. If you want to make it again, I won't revert it again. However I would suggest an appropriate edit summary this time.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I was on "vandalism patrol" reviewing hundreds of IP edits. Your edit, via a quick glance, looked like valdalism, since you deleted a large amount of content with no edit summary. If you want to make it again, I won't revert it again. However I would suggest an appropriate edit summary this time. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

279617 +++$+++ 64.110.251.69 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.153304520E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:64.110.251.69|64.110.251.69]] 03:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
279618 +++$+++ EvocativeIntrigue +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279617 +++$+++ 279617 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.153335600E09 +++$+++ Have a great day! [[User:EvocativeIntrigue|'''EVOCATIVE'''INTRIGUE]] <small>[[User talk:EvocativeIntrigue|'''TALK'''TO'''ME''']] | [[Special:Emailuser\/EvocativeIntrigue|'''EMAIL'''ME]] |  +++$+++ :Have a great day! [[User:EvocativeIntrigue|'''EVOCATIVE'''INTRIGUE]] <small>[[User talk:EvocativeIntrigue|'''TALK'''TO'''ME''']] | [[Special:Emailuser/EvocativeIntrigue|'''EMAIL'''ME]] | [[User:EvocativeIntrigue/Feedback|'''IMPROVE'''ME]]</small> 12:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

17474 +++$+++ DRosenbach +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17474 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-25 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.259193600E09 +++$+++ It is a demand far beyond that which is outlined by [[WP:AGF]] to expect others to overlook your poor choice of words -- whether intentional or unintentional -- when responding in defense of one's edits.  If I say, \"X is Y,\" and you state afterwords, \"''Actually'', X is Z,\" that indicates a rebuttal of my statement, despite your best intentions or poor grasp of the (nuances of the) English language.  If you understand that, we are all good. ''' +++$+++ It is a demand far beyond that which is outlined by [[WP:AGF]] to expect others to overlook your poor choice of words -- whether intentional or unintentional -- when responding in defense of one's edits.  If I say, "X is Y," and you state afterwords, "''Actually'', X is Z," that indicates a rebuttal of my statement, despite your best intentions or poor grasp of the (nuances of the) English language.  If you understand that, we are all good. '''[[User:DRosenbach|<span style="color:#006400">DRosenbach</span>]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:DRosenbach|<span style="color:#006400">Talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/DRosenbach|<span style="color:#006400">Contribs</span>]])</sup> 16:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
17475 +++$+++ DRosenbach +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17474 +++$+++ 17474 +++$+++ 2009-11-25 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.259204160E09 +++$+++ It's over -- just realize that prefacing a statement with \"Actually,\" indicates that you are refuting what the other person has said.  Then to go ahead and state the '''exact same thing''' makes one look odd. ''' +++$+++ :It's over -- just realize that prefacing a statement with "Actually," indicates that you are refuting what the other person has said.  Then to go ahead and state the '''exact same thing''' makes one look odd. '''[[User:DRosenbach|<span style="color:#006400">DRosenbach</span>]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:DRosenbach|<span style="color:#006400">Talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/DRosenbach|<span style="color:#006400">Contribs</span>]])</sup> 18:56, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

279619 +++$+++ Bhadani +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.153337580E09 +++$+++ I wish you all the best on the ocasion of your wiki-birthday. Have a nice and creative time. -- +++$+++ I wish you all the best on the ocasion of your wiki-birthday. Have a nice and creative time. --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] 12:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
279620 +++$+++ Mailer diablo +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279619 +++$+++ 279619 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.153355040E09 +++$+++ Happy first edit day, and more great edits to come! :) -  +++$+++ * Happy first edit day, and more great edits to come! :) - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 17:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

17476 +++$+++ A Sniper +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17476 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-26 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.259278020E09 +++$+++ After all that work in figuring out the photoboxes, another editor has come along to un-do it all. Please assist me in keeping the peace... Best,  +++$+++ After all that work in figuring out the photoboxes, another editor has come along to un-do it all. Please assist me in keeping the peace... Best, [[User:A Sniper|A Sniper]] ([[User talk:A Sniper|talk]]) 15:27, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
17477 +++$+++ A Sniper +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17476 +++$+++ 17476 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.259407020E09 +++$+++ Thank you. \u05e9\u05d1\u05ea \u05e9\u05dc\u05d5\u05dd   +++$+++ :Thank you. שבת שלום  [[User:A Sniper|A Sniper]] ([[User talk:A Sniper|talk]]) 03:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

541766 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-12 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.223863800E09 +++$+++ Do you have something against redirecting articles, so that I don't exactly have to clog the AfD pages as much? When articles aren't going to receive any responses using merge tags, boldly merging or redirecting is an acceptable practice. Reverting them just forces me to nominate them at a later point. Just because I'm some sort of \"evil ne'er-do-well\" to people, it shouldn't entail undoing completely valid redirects.  +++$+++ Do you have something against redirecting articles, so that I don't exactly have to clog the AfD pages as much? When articles aren't going to receive any responses using merge tags, boldly merging or redirecting is an acceptable practice. Reverting them just forces me to nominate them at a later point. Just because I'm some sort of "evil ne'er-do-well" to people, it shouldn't entail undoing completely valid redirects. [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 19:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
541767 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541766 +++$+++ 541766 +++$+++ 2008-10-12 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.223864040E09 +++$+++ De-facto deleting articles that have recently gone through AfD as keep is disruptive.  And the reason you don't want to clog AfD pages with nomination after nomination after nomination is a self-serving one, so I ask that you spare your hand-jive of altruism.   +++$+++ :De-facto deleting articles that have recently gone through AfD as keep is disruptive.  And the reason you don't want to clog AfD pages with nomination after nomination after nomination is a self-serving one, so I ask that you spare your hand-jive of altruism.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 19:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
541768 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541766 +++$+++ 541767 +++$+++ 2008-10-12 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.223864520E09 +++$+++ Only six of them were in a recent AfD that ended in a keep (which only received three votes that had nothing to do with notability). What was the reason to revert the rest of them? I normally try to stay between five and ten AfDs, but I have to go above that in this kind of case.  +++$+++ ::Only six of them were in a recent AfD that ended in a keep (which only received three votes that had nothing to do with notability). What was the reason to revert the rest of them? I normally try to stay between five and ten AfDs, but I have to go above that in this kind of case. [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 19:22, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

279623 +++$+++ He Who Is +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279623 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-21 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.153468740E09 +++$+++ In the article on [[Absolute Value]] you recently removed the notations for real and imaginary part I had placed in the section on complex numbers. In your edit summary, you said they were \"undefined.\" I am confused, as these notations used in the articles on [[Real part|real]] and [[Imaginary Part|imaginary]] parts. On the other hand, I am pleased that when reverting it, you added the condition that x and y must be real numbers, ensuring that they are in fact the real and imaginary parts of z. Although both definitions are eaqually true, I merely believe that when the dfinition explicitly specifies the real and imaginary parts, it is easier for a reader to follow to the next conclusion that ties it the pythagorean theorem and states that it represents the distance from the origin. --  +++$+++ In the article on [[Absolute Value]] you recently removed the notations for real and imaginary part I had placed in the section on complex numbers. In your edit summary, you said they were "undefined." I am confused, as these notations used in the articles on [[Real part|real]] and [[Imaginary Part|imaginary]] parts. On the other hand, I am pleased that when reverting it, you added the condition that x and y must be real numbers, ensuring that they are in fact the real and imaginary parts of z. Although both definitions are eaqually true, I merely believe that when the dfinition explicitly specifies the real and imaginary parts, it is easier for a reader to follow to the next conclusion that ties it the pythagorean theorem and states that it represents the distance from the origin. -- [[User:He Who Is|He Who Is]]<sup><small>[ [[User_talk:He Who Is|Talk]] ]</small></sup> 00:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
279624 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279623 +++$+++ 279623 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.153479840E09 +++$+++ Hi He (may I call you He?), When I wrote that the notation <math> \\Re z <\/math> and  was <math> \\Im z <\/math> was \"undefined\", I meant that it was undefined in that article. But I don't see how using that notation makes things clearer, especially given the attending diagram. Anyway, if you feel strongly about it, you should probably raise that issue on the article's talk page and see what other editors think.  +++$+++ :Hi He (may I call you He?), When I wrote that the notation <math> \Re z </math> and  was <math> \Im z </math> was "undefined", I meant that it was undefined in that article. But I don't see how using that notation makes things clearer, especially given the attending diagram. Anyway, if you feel strongly about it, you should probably raise that issue on the article's talk page and see what other editors think. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:04, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
279625 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279623 +++$+++ 279623 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.154053980E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome. What no stones thrown my way for referring to Bishzilla, as a damsel in distress?  +++$+++ :You're very welcome. What no stones thrown my way for referring to Bishzilla, as a damsel in distress? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
279626 +++$+++ Giano +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279623 +++$+++ 279625 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.154062620E09 +++$+++ I am not a Knight Errant! and any more cracks like that and it won't be Bishonen in distress!  +++$+++ ::I am not a Knight Errant! and any more cracks like that and it won't be Bishonen in distress! [[User:Giano|Giano]] | [[User talk:Giano|talk]] 21:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
279627 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279623 +++$+++ 279626 +++$+++ 2006-07-27 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.154064240E09 +++$+++ Oh yeah?  +++$+++ :::Oh yeah? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
279628 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279623 +++$+++ 279623 +++$+++ 2006-07-31 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.154405880E09 +++$+++ Those damn ''[[lacuna]]e'', just when it was getting interesting too.  +++$+++ :Those damn ''[[lacuna]]e'', just when it was getting interesting too. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

17480 +++$+++ Ryan Postlethwaite +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17480 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-08 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.268105580E09 +++$+++ Hello Gilisa. I've reverted your edit to [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee\/Noticeboard]] as this is the place where the Arbitration Committee make announcements to the community - it is not for filing cases. If you wish to file a request for arbitration, please follow the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case]]. Regards, ''' +++$+++ Hello Gilisa. I've reverted your edit to [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard]] as this is the place where the Arbitration Committee make announcements to the community - it is not for filing cases. If you wish to file a request for arbitration, please follow the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case]]. Regards, '''[[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|<font color="green">Ryan</font> <font color="purple">Postlethwaite</font>]]<sup>See [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Postlethwaite|the mess I've created]] or [[User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite|let's have banter]]</sup>''' 19:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
17481 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17480 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-08 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.268105700E09 +++$+++ NP, but I thought I preceded you in this ;)-- +++$+++ ::NP, but I thought I preceded you in this ;)--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 19:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
17482 +++$+++ Ryan Postlethwaite +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17480 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-08 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.268105820E09 +++$+++ You did :-) If you need any help filing a request, please don't hesitate to contact me. ''' +++$+++ :::You did :-) If you need any help filing a request, please don't hesitate to contact me. '''[[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|<font color="green">Ryan</font> <font color="purple">Postlethwaite</font>]]<sup>See [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Postlethwaite|the mess I've created]] or [[User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite|let's have banter]]</sup>''' 19:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

541769 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-14 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.223987760E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 05:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
541770 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541769 +++$+++ 541769 +++$+++ 2008-10-17 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.224277620E09 +++$+++ Already taken care of, robot.  Thank you.   +++$+++ :Already taken care of, robot.  Thank you.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 14:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

541771 +++$+++ Nightscream +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541771 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-18 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.224366900E09 +++$+++ Hi. Can you read [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Asgardian#Blocked_for_a_week this section] and then offer your opinion on the points raised, specifically the issue of titles in the FCB, length and detail of given sections, what constitutes \u201cfannishness\u201d, etc.? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. Can you read [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Asgardian#Blocked_for_a_week this section] and then offer your opinion on the points raised, specifically the issue of titles in the FCB, length and detail of given sections, what constitutes “fannishness”, etc.? Thanks. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 14:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
541772 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541771 +++$+++ 541771 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.224804180E09 +++$+++ I'll try to look into it later today.   +++$+++ :I'll try to look into it later today.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 16:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

17487 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-23 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.269366600E09 +++$+++ Translation: I'm very lucky to find user (man or woman-'''my comment-I'm a man''') who can speak both Hebrew and Spanish because I find it preety difficult for me to edit some intersting articles. Also, (look if you are) familiar with themes like ancient histoy, you are wellcome to join (to edit) in the article on Masada in Spanish wikipedia. Sincerely-- +++$+++ Translation: I'm very lucky to find user (man or woman-'''my comment-I'm a man''') who can speak both Hebrew and Spanish because I find it preety difficult for me to edit some intersting articles. Also, (look if you are) familiar with themes like ancient histoy, you are wellcome to join (to edit) in the article on Masada in Spanish wikipedia. Sincerely--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 10:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
17488 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.269366600E09 +++$+++ Hola, me encanto a concocerte tambien. Te agradesco por la invitacion y estor seguro que hay otras fuentes que puedan ayudar con el articulo, si no en Espanol en Italiano y los podra usar tambien. No estoy seguro que tengo el tiempo para tomar parte en el proyecto pero podre ayudar te en la ejecucion. Y ahora, podemos pasar a conversar en Ingles? Por cierto, me usuario :)-- +++$+++ :Hola, me encanto a concocerte tambien. Te agradesco por la invitacion y estor seguro que hay otras fuentes que puedan ayudar con el articulo, si no en Espanol en Italiano y los podra usar tambien. No estoy seguro que tengo el tiempo para tomar parte en el proyecto pero podre ayudar te en la ejecucion. Y ahora, podemos pasar a conversar en Ingles? Por cierto, me usuario :)--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 10:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
17489 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.269366600E09 +++$+++ Translation: I'm very glad to meet you too. I thank you for your inventation and I'm sure there are other sources which can help in better editing of the article-if not in Spanish then in Italian and you may use them. I'm not sure that I've time to join into this project but I will be able to assisst. And now, should we return to discuss in English? BTW, I'm male user-- +++$+++ :Translation: I'm very glad to meet you too. I thank you for your inventation and I'm sure there are other sources which can help in better editing of the article-if not in Spanish then in Italian and you may use them. I'm not sure that I've time to join into this project but I will be able to assisst. And now, should we return to discuss in English? BTW, I'm male user--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 10:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
17490 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.269385800E09 +++$+++ Well, if it's easier for you we can correspond in Spanish. Preferably via E-mails :)-- +++$+++ :::Well, if it's easier for you we can correspond in Spanish. Preferably via E-mails :)--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 16:10, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
17491 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.269366840E09 +++$+++ Tiamut, you ended your comment on FoG talk page[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.\/wiki\/User_talk:Factsontheground#Soapboxing] with a sentence which is last words are written in Arabic: Don't worry though my friend, because it is all really ''awha(m) min beit il ankaboot''. The translation of it is \"Don't worry though my friend, because it is all really stronger than the house of the spider\". Please notice that you should always add translation when you write in language different than English. Also, the term \"house of the spider\" is famous tem that was coined by and regulary use [[Hezbolla]] leader when he speak out publicaly against Israel-according to him, Israel is \"the house of the spider\". So, in this context, I just want to ask you if that's what you refered to? Does anyone who oppose some of FoG edits, to the matter of fact, is included in what you refered to as \"the house of the spider\"?-- +++$+++ :Tiamut, you ended your comment on FoG talk page[http://en.wikipedia./wiki/User_talk:Factsontheground#Soapboxing] with a sentence which is last words are written in Arabic: Don't worry though my friend, because it is all really ''awha(m) min beit il ankaboot''. The translation of it is "Don't worry though my friend, because it is all really stronger than the house of the spider". Please notice that you should always add translation when you write in language different than English. Also, the term "house of the spider" is famous tem that was coined by and regulary use [[Hezbolla]] leader when he speak out publicaly against Israel-according to him, Israel is "the house of the spider". So, in this context, I just want to ask you if that's what you refered to? Does anyone who oppose some of FoG edits, to the matter of fact, is included in what you refered to as "the house of the spider"?--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa|talk]]) 10:54, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
17492 +++$+++ Tiamut +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 17491 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.269386460E09 +++$+++ Gilisa, it means \"weaker than the spider's web\", not stronger. Its a metaphor and I'm using it with multiple meanings here intended for Factsontheground, not anyone else and not about anyone editing here, but about the general situation she faced. Its meant to be of some comfort to her. Can you leave it at that?  +++$+++ ::Gilisa, it means "weaker than the spider's web", not stronger. Its a metaphor and I'm using it with multiple meanings here intended for Factsontheground, not anyone else and not about anyone editing here, but about the general situation she faced. Its meant to be of some comfort to her. Can you leave it at that? [[User:Tiamut|<b><font color="#B93B8F">T</font><font color="#800000">i</font><font color="#B93B8F">a</font><font color="#800000">m</font><font color="#B93B8F">u</font><font color="#800000">t</font></b>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]</sup> 16:21, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
17493 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 17492 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.269388320E09 +++$+++ Tiamut you wrote: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Factsontheground&diff=prev&oldid=351589686 \"Breein1007, your comment above crosses all kinds of lines\"]. May I please ask if you also believe that statements by facts  \"Wikipedia is openly racist against Palestinians\" that is proudly displayed at the user talk page also \"crosses all kinds of lines\", or you agree with it?-- +++$+++ :::Tiamut you wrote: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Factsontheground&diff=prev&oldid=351589686 "Breein1007, your comment above crosses all kinds of lines"]. May I please ask if you also believe that statements by facts  "Wikipedia is openly racist against Palestinians" that is proudly displayed at the user talk page also "crosses all kinds of lines", or you agree with it?--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 16:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
17494 +++$+++ Tiamut +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 17493 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.269389340E09 +++$+++ I don't care to comment on the content of that edit. I will say that considering your own sensitivity to people repeatedly posting at your talk page taking issue with your comments and advocating for you to be blocked, I would think you would be more sensitive to a user who is blocked from even editing their talk page and can't respond to posts made by you and others tht she doesn't want to her from right now. Both you and Breein1007 should leave her alone.  +++$+++ ::::I don't care to comment on the content of that edit. I will say that considering your own sensitivity to people repeatedly posting at your talk page taking issue with your comments and advocating for you to be blocked, I would think you would be more sensitive to a user who is blocked from even editing their talk page and can't respond to posts made by you and others tht she doesn't want to her from right now. Both you and Breein1007 should leave her alone. [[User:Tiamut|<b><font color="#B93B8F">T</font><font color="#800000">i</font><font color="#B93B8F">a</font><font color="#800000">m</font><font color="#B93B8F">u</font><font color="#800000">t</font></b>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]</sup> 17:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
17495 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 17494 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.269389820E09 +++$+++ I knew, you would not care to comment! BTW I know your \"friend\". I saw many like her, who would scream on demonstrations: \"Palestine will be free from the river to the sea\" while displaying Israeli flags with swastikas, and then accuse everybody around in being \"racist\".-- +++$+++ :::::I knew, you would not care to comment! BTW I know your "friend". I saw many like her, who would scream on demonstrations: "Palestine will be free from the river to the sea" while displaying Israeli flags with swastikas, and then accuse everybody around in being "racist".--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 17:17, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
17496 +++$+++ Tiamut +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 17495 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.269390300E09 +++$+++ If you knew I wouldn't answer then your question was designed for some other end. Please stop soapboxing on my talk page and talking about a blocked editor that I've already asked you to leave alone. Dont bother replying.  +++$+++ ::::::If you knew I wouldn't answer then your question was designed for some other end. Please stop soapboxing on my talk page and talking about a blocked editor that I've already asked you to leave alone. Dont bother replying. [[User:Tiamut|<b><font color="#B93B8F">T</font><font color="#800000">i</font><font color="#B93B8F">a</font><font color="#800000">m</font><font color="#B93B8F">u</font><font color="#800000">t</font></b>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]</sup> 17:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
17497 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 17492 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.269390540E09 +++$+++ You choosed to put it in Arabic, it is a very well known phrase sounded by [[Hasan Nasrallah]] who describe Israel that way (\"weaker than spider web\" there is also the [[Hezbolla]] museum named \"the Spider house\". In the context of your grievances on racism against palestinians on FoG talk page it sound realy bad. Would appreciate if you avoid it next time, if it's not too much to ask.-- +++$+++ :::You choosed to put it in Arabic, it is a very well known phrase sounded by [[Hasan Nasrallah]] who describe Israel that way ("weaker than spider web" there is also the [[Hezbolla]] museum named "the Spider house". In the context of your grievances on racism against palestinians on FoG talk page it sound realy bad. Would appreciate if you avoid it next time, if it's not too much to ask.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa|talk]]) 17:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
17498 +++$+++ Tiamut +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 17497 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.269390780E09 +++$+++ It is too much to ask. Your assumption of bad faith regarding its meaning is not my problem. I will write in whatever language I want to. Just because [[Hassan Nasrallah]] uses a metaphor doesn't mean that I can't and I will use it whenever I see fit. And now if you're quite done, I'd appreciate you also staying off my talk page for now. Thanks.  +++$+++ ::::It is too much to ask. Your assumption of bad faith regarding its meaning is not my problem. I will write in whatever language I want to. Just because [[Hassan Nasrallah]] uses a metaphor doesn't mean that I can't and I will use it whenever I see fit. And now if you're quite done, I'd appreciate you also staying off my talk page for now. Thanks. [[User:Tiamut|<b><font color="#B93B8F">T</font><font color="#800000">i</font><font color="#B93B8F">a</font><font color="#800000">m</font><font color="#B93B8F">u</font><font color="#800000">t</font></b>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]</sup> 17:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
17499 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17487 +++$+++ 17495 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.269391560E09 +++$+++ You ask me to stay out of your talk page and at the same time accused me for not assuming good faith? And what about this[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AQedarite&action=historysubmit&diff=351598618&oldid=351554766], where you specifically told that my edits have only disruptive meaning. And the problem is not with the Arabic but with the context and the words. But of course it's your choice, I only asked. In any case, as long as I'm not allowed to write on your talkpage-you are not alowed to write on mine as well.-- +++$+++ ::::::You ask me to stay out of your talk page and at the same time accused me for not assuming good faith? And what about this[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AQedarite&action=historysubmit&diff=351598618&oldid=351554766], where you specifically told that my edits have only disruptive meaning. And the problem is not with the Arabic but with the context and the words. But of course it's your choice, I only asked. In any case, as long as I'm not allowed to write on your talkpage-you are not alowed to write on mine as well.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 17:46, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

279632 +++$+++ Llywrch +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-08 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.155078360E09 +++$+++ It was great meeting you too at the party. Too bad we didn't have a chance to talk at Wikimania again. (I had connection problems with my Nokia at this mother of all Wiki-meetups, & wasn't until I was at the airport in Chicago that I finaly figured out how I could have made it all work. But then, I was more interested in connecting with human-based protocols there, & not network-based ones.) --  +++$+++ It was great meeting you too at the party. Too bad we didn't have a chance to talk at Wikimania again. (I had connection problems with my Nokia at this mother of all Wiki-meetups, & wasn't until I was at the airport in Chicago that I finaly figured out how I could have made it all work. But then, I was more interested in connecting with human-based protocols there, & not network-based ones.) -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] 16:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
279633 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279632 +++$+++ 279632 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.155083220E09 +++$+++ Yes there was just not enough time to meet and talk to all the people I wanted. Also I couldn't stay away from the main session speakers, all of whom were fantastic, but which meant even less time to talk and discuss with my fellow Wikipedians. Let's keep in touch, and maybe will will have a chance to see each other again at next year's Wikimania.  +++$+++ :Yes there was just not enough time to meet and talk to all the people I wanted. Also I couldn't stay away from the main session speakers, all of whom were fantastic, but which meant even less time to talk and discuss with my fellow Wikipedians. Let's keep in touch, and maybe will will have a chance to see each other again at next year's Wikimania. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

279634 +++$+++ Slrubenstein +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279634 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-27 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.156718520E09 +++$+++ Would you be willing to comment, here: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research\/Primary_v._secondary_sources_discussion] +++$+++ Would you be willing to comment, here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research/Primary_v._secondary_sources_discussion][[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]]   |  [[User talk:Slrubenstein|Talk]] 15:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
279635 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279634 +++$+++ 279634 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.156928160E09 +++$+++ I've replied on your talk page.  +++$+++ :I've replied on your talk page. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 01:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

541779 +++$+++ Ameliorate! +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541779 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-18 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.226997480E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> <span style=\"font-family:tahoma;font-size:80%;font-weight:bold;\">~  +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> <span style="font-family:tahoma;font-size:80%;font-weight:bold;">~ [[User:Ameliorate!|<span style="color:black;">User:Ameliorate!</span>]]</span> <sup>&#40;with the !&#41; &#40;[[User talk:Ameliorate!|talk]]&#41;</sup> 00:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
541780 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541779 +++$+++ 541779 +++$+++ 2008-11-18 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.227050220E09 +++$+++ Nice!   +++$+++ :Nice!  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 15:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

279636 +++$+++ Slrubenstein +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279636 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-30 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.156980420E09 +++$+++ Thanks Paul.  A lot has already been said on the talk pages and frankly I am not sure what anyone else could add.  Things have also quieted down.  However, for a short time it looked like two or three recent editors were about to seriously weaken the policy, while claiming to defend it.  All I can ask is that you keep it on your watchlist (the policy page).  At some point it will be unblocked, and at that time it will be important that experienced knowledgable editors keep an eye on it to protect it against any edits that weaken it.  Thanks, +++$+++ Thanks Paul.  A lot has already been said on the talk pages and frankly I am not sure what anyone else could add.  Things have also quieted down.  However, for a short time it looked like two or three recent editors were about to seriously weaken the policy, while claiming to defend it.  All I can ask is that you keep it on your watchlist (the policy page).  At some point it will be unblocked, and at that time it will be important that experienced knowledgable editors keep an eye on it to protect it against any edits that weaken it.  Thanks,[[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]]   |  [[User talk:Slrubenstein|Talk]] 16:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
279637 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279636 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.156982400E09 +++$+++ Will do.  +++$+++ ::Will do. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:00, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

570894 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-08 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.157729280E09 +++$+++ To you, Mets501 I give the Strive banner for Striving in your kindness and positive attitude. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ To you, Mets501 I give the Strive banner for Striving in your kindness and positive attitude. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ Worker and Parasite|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 08:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
570895 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570894 +++$+++ 570894 +++$+++ 2006-09-08 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.157737860E09 +++$+++ Thanks Dfrg!  By the way, which strive logo are we using, [[:Image:Strive.jpg]] or [[:Image:Strive.png]]?  \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ :Thanks Dfrg!  By the way, which strive logo are we using, [[:Image:Strive.jpg]] or [[:Image:Strive.png]]?  —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets<small>501</small>]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 10:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
570896 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570894 +++$+++ 570894 +++$+++ 2006-09-08 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.157737980E09 +++$+++ Nah mates.  We are using striv?.''' +++$+++ *Nah mates.  We are using striv?.'''[[User:culverin|Culverin]]''' '''[[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 10:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

279638 +++$+++  +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-07 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.157636460E09 +++$+++ I love you man. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ I love you man. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ Worker and Parasite|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 06:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
279639 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279638 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-07 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.157664540E09 +++$+++ Wow an unknown admirer. You sure you don't have me confused with some other bloke? Have we met in a former life? To what do I owe the honor? Are you looking for a long term commitment or just a one night stand?  +++$+++ ::Wow an unknown admirer. You sure you don't have me confused with some other bloke? Have we met in a former life? To what do I owe the honor? Are you looking for a long term commitment or just a one night stand? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
279640 +++$+++ Drizzt Jamo +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279638 +++$+++ 279638 +++$+++ 2006-09-07 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.157637180E09 +++$+++ No I love you man... Can i have some money  +++$+++ :No I love you man... Can i have some money [[User:Drizzt Jamo|Jamo]] 06:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
279641 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279638 +++$+++ 279640 +++$+++ 2006-09-07 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.157664540E09 +++$+++ Jamo are you panhandling from me or Dfrg.msc?  +++$+++ :: Jamo are you panhandling from me or Dfrg.msc? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

221369 +++$+++ Bodaonline +++$+++ RattleMan +++$+++ 221369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-01 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.214922600E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Bodaonline|Bodaonline]] ([[User talk:Bodaonline|talk]]) 07:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
221370 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ RattleMan +++$+++ 221369 +++$+++ 221369 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.214923860E09 +++$+++ I've failed to find the free link on the site and all I can see is ''contact us'' and the site is commercial.  +++$+++ :I've failed to find the free link on the site and all I can see is ''contact us'' and the site is commercial. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 07:51, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

541785 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541785 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-22 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.229941680E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! {{#ifeq:yes|no|Your article {{#if:Kenneth Michael Trentadue|[[Kenneth Michael Trentadue]]&nbsp;}}was recently nominated at [[T:TDYK|Did you know]] to be featured on the main page.  The nomination has now been reviewed, and}}{{#ifeq:yes|yes|Your submission {{#if:Kenneth Michael Trentadue|of [[Kenneth Michael Trentadue]]{{#if:|&nbsp;and [[{{{extra}}}]]}}}} at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and}} there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath {{#if:Kenneth Michael Trentadue|'''[[Template talk:DYK#Kenneth Michael Trentadue{{#if:|_and {{{extra}}}}}|your nomination's entry]]'''{{#if:|Template talk:DYK#Articles created\/expanded on {{{date}}}}}|your nomination's entry}} and respond there as soon as possible.  {{#if:|<\/br>{{{2}}}|Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!}} {{#ifeq:no|yes|&mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''<\/sup><\/small>\/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions\/Politizer|contribs]]'''<\/sub><\/small> 02:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)}}<!--Template:DYKproblem--> &mdash; +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! {{#ifeq:yes|no|Your article {{#if:Kenneth Michael Trentadue|[[Kenneth Michael Trentadue]]&nbsp;}}was recently nominated at [[T:TDYK|Did you know]] to be featured on the main page.  The nomination has now been reviewed, and}}{{#ifeq:yes|yes|Your submission {{#if:Kenneth Michael Trentadue|of [[Kenneth Michael Trentadue]]{{#if:|&nbsp;and [[{{{extra}}}]]}}}} at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and}} there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath {{#if:Kenneth Michael Trentadue|'''[[Template talk:DYK#Kenneth Michael Trentadue{{#if:|_and {{{extra}}}}}|your nomination's entry]]'''{{#if:|Template talk:DYK#Articles created/expanded on {{{date}}}}}|your nomination's entry}} and respond there as soon as possible.  {{#if:|</br>{{{2}}}|Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!}} {{#ifeq:no|yes|&mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 02:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)}}<!--Template:DYKproblem--> &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 02:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
541786 +++$+++ Politizer +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541785 +++$+++ 541785 +++$+++ 2008-12-25 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.230193320E09 +++$+++ Hey Fordmadoxfraud, there is one more comment awaiting your response at the DYK nomination.  Thanks, &mdash; +++$+++ :Hey Fordmadoxfraud, there is one more comment awaiting your response at the DYK nomination.  Thanks, &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]&nbsp;<small><sup>'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''</sub></small> 00:22, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

279642 +++$+++ Trovatore +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-13 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.158142260E09 +++$+++ have you noticed the activities of [[User:WATARU]]?  Seems to be up to his old tricks at [[perfect number]] and [[division ring]]. -- +++$+++ have you noticed the activities of [[User:WATARU]]?  Seems to be up to his old tricks at [[perfect number]] and [[division ring]]. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] 03:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
279643 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279642 +++$+++ 279642 +++$+++ 2006-09-13 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.158149160E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks for the heads up.  +++$+++ :OK, thanks for the heads up. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

17500 +++$+++ Kordas +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17500 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-25 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.269504060E09 +++$+++ Wow... have you been blocked? For doing anything? That's so sad... Well, I have one proposal for you: do you want to record the word \"Masada\" in Hebrew? I just need something like [[:File:He-Yafo.ogg|this]], and thereby I could use it same way you can see [[Haifa|here]]. If you don't want to use your own voice, could you convince anyone to do that instead? Thank you so much and hold on, dude <code style=\"background:cyan\">:)<\/code>  +++$+++ Wow... have you been blocked? For doing anything? That's so sad... Well, I have one proposal for you: do you want to record the word "Masada" in Hebrew? I just need something like [[:File:He-Yafo.ogg|this]], and thereby I could use it same way you can see [[Haifa|here]]. If you don't want to use your own voice, could you convince anyone to do that instead? Thank you so much and hold on, dude <code style="background:cyan">:)</code> [[User:Kordas|Kordas]] (''[[User_talk:Kordas|sínome!]]'') 01:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
17501 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17500 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.269527580E09 +++$+++ Trust me, for nothing but replying too much on a certain ANI. However according to WP:GUIDELINES. As for your suggesstion, would love to do that. And, oh, I feel bad now-we can correspond here in Spanish. I gained it after living in Argentina (Buenos Aires) for more than two years.-- +++$+++ ::Trust me, for nothing but replying too much on a certain ANI. However according to WP:GUIDELINES. As for your suggesstion, would love to do that. And, oh, I feel bad now-we can correspond here in Spanish. I gained it after living in Argentina (Buenos Aires) for more than two years.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 07:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
17502 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17500 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.269530220E09 +++$+++ I just recorded it, but I can't upload it until what left of the 12 hours pass. And at least in one of the samples you sent me (the one I was hearing) the speaker don't sound to have Israeli accent.-- +++$+++ ::I just recorded it, but I can't upload it until what left of the 12 hours pass. And at least in one of the samples you sent me (the one I was hearing) the speaker don't sound to have Israeli accent.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 08:17, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
17503 +++$+++ Kordas +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17500 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.269554100E09 +++$+++ \xa1Muchas gracias! You were so fast, hehe. But let me tell you forgot to choice one license <code style=\"background:cyan\">xD<\/code> I noticed that fact when I was moving the file to Commons to be used in other projects. And about other files I showed to you, feel free to record all files you think can be replaced or improved. !\u05ea\u05d5\u05d3\u05d4  +++$+++ :::¡Muchas gracias! You were so fast, hehe. But let me tell you forgot to choice one license <code style="background:cyan">xD</code> I noticed that fact when I was moving the file to Commons to be used in other projects. And about other files I showed to you, feel free to record all files you think can be replaced or improved. !תודה [[User:Kordas|Kordas]] (''[[User_talk:Kordas|sínome!]]'') 14:55, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
17504 +++$+++ Kordas +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17500 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-25 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.269581100E09 +++$+++ I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File:MasadainHebrew.ogg&diff=prev&oldid=352039360 chose] <nowiki>{{cc-by-3.0}}<\/nowiki>, same license I use with my own photographs. Then I went to Commons and uploaded there same file but renamed, [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:He-Masada.ogg He-Masada.ogg] And finally I linked the file [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Masada&diff=prev&oldid=352040345 here] and [http:\/\/es.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Masada&diff=prev&oldid=35512775 en espa\xf1ol] They both look very cool now, thanks to you <code style=\"background:cyan\">:D<\/code>  +++$+++ :::::I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:MasadainHebrew.ogg&diff=prev&oldid=352039360 chose] <nowiki>{{cc-by-3.0}}</nowiki>, same license I use with my own photographs. Then I went to Commons and uploaded there same file but renamed, [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:He-Masada.ogg He-Masada.ogg] And finally I linked the file [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Masada&diff=prev&oldid=352040345 here] and [http://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Masada&diff=prev&oldid=35512775 en español] They both look very cool now, thanks to you <code style="background:cyan">:D</code> [[User:Kordas|Kordas]] (''[[User_talk:Kordas|sínome!]]'') 22:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
17505 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17500 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-26 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.269635940E09 +++$+++ I have much interest in Iberian history and in Latin America. It's clear that you have interest in Israel related subjects, so realy out of curiosity only, can I ask where it's come from? Regards-- +++$+++ ::::::I have much interest in Iberian history and in Latin America. It's clear that you have interest in Israel related subjects, so realy out of curiosity only, can I ask where it's come from? Regards--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 13:39, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
17506 +++$+++ Kordas +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17500 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-26 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.269647220E09 +++$+++ I have archaeological training, so the interest in such region came inmediately at early age. And the interesting history of Jewish people helped as well: it was an unusual example of how a people could go back home through centuries of persecution and hate to be a nation again. Really instructive. Kind regards,  +++$+++ :::::::I have archaeological training, so the interest in such region came inmediately at early age. And the interesting history of Jewish people helped as well: it was an unusual example of how a people could go back home through centuries of persecution and hate to be a nation again. Really instructive. Kind regards, [[User:Kordas|Kordas]] (''[[User_talk:Kordas|sínome!]]'') 16:47, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
17507 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17500 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-27 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.269735660E09 +++$+++ Yes it's, but I was thinking on something else-I know that many Spanish people are descendants of the [[Anusim]]-I thought that you have such background and you aware of it and interested in it. Well, in any case you are a great person and if you need any assistance of any kind don't hasitate to contact me. Also, we can return to Spanish! Regards and best wishes-- +++$+++ :::::::: Yes it's, but I was thinking on something else-I know that many Spanish people are descendants of the [[Anusim]]-I thought that you have such background and you aware of it and interested in it. Well, in any case you are a great person and if you need any assistance of any kind don't hasitate to contact me. Also, we can return to Spanish! Regards and best wishes--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 17:21, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

279645 +++$+++ Geogre +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-17 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.158540720E09 +++$+++ People who don't even know where the articles come from are deciding that their egos' needs are greater than community, consent, consensus, and common sense, are deciding that their private beliefs are superior to the negotiated rules of the site, and are deciding that they know better than all others.  For that, they deserve no articles, no input, no debate, no conversation, and no more than the isolation of their self-congratulations and self-adulation.  My own strike was a labor action, and I agree with others with the same impulse.  Pretty boxes and category tags and stub parades will never take the place of people willing to put their professional-level work on a volunteer project.  And, if we were all replaced tomorrow, the replacements, like scabs, would soon join the desertion unless conditions were to change.   +++$+++ People who don't even know where the articles come from are deciding that their egos' needs are greater than community, consent, consensus, and common sense, are deciding that their private beliefs are superior to the negotiated rules of the site, and are deciding that they know better than all others.  For that, they deserve no articles, no input, no debate, no conversation, and no more than the isolation of their self-congratulations and self-adulation.  My own strike was a labor action, and I agree with others with the same impulse.  Pretty boxes and category tags and stub parades will never take the place of people willing to put their professional-level work on a volunteer project.  And, if we were all replaced tomorrow, the replacements, like scabs, would soon join the desertion unless conditions were to change.  [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 17:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
279646 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279645 +++$+++ 279645 +++$+++ 2006-09-17 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.158541260E09 +++$+++ If the current trend continues, I would also consider bailing out. So far I am left with the hope that these are just a few irregularities in an otherwise rather well-behaving community (and I think  that irregularities have happened in the past too, and the ArbCom\/Jimobo have taken pretty good care of the worst ones). (I hope I am right :) Good luck. Hope you come back.  +++$+++ : If the current trend continues, I would also consider bailing out. So far I am left with the hope that these are just a few irregularities in an otherwise rather well-behaving community (and I think  that irregularities have happened in the past too, and the ArbCom/Jimobo have taken pretty good care of the worst ones). (I hope I am right :) Good luck. Hope you come back. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 18:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

541790 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-15 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.232088420E09 +++$+++ I started an article [[Alexander Maccabeus]] in December of 2007. Is this the same person as [[Alexander of Judaea]]? Should the articles be merged? -- +++$+++ I started an article [[Alexander Maccabeus]] in December of 2007. Is this the same person as [[Alexander of Judaea]]? Should the articles be merged? --[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 22:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
541791 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541790 +++$+++ 541790 +++$+++ 2009-03-04 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.236199860E09 +++$+++ Good job! -- +++$+++ :Good job! --[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 12:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
541792 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541790 +++$+++ 541791 +++$+++ 2009-03-05 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.236248580E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  I'm sorry I didn't get to it sooner.  Real life keeps intervening.  Thanks a lot for bringing it to my attention, btw.  +++$+++ ::Thanks!  I'm sorry I didn't get to it sooner.  Real life keeps intervening.  Thanks a lot for bringing it to my attention, btw. [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 02:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

279647 +++$+++ Bunchofgrapes +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-17 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.158541980E09 +++$+++ I endorse the view that things are messed up around here. Carnildo's RfA was a travesty, and there is nothing I can say about Tony Sidaway's behavior of late that doesn't infringe [[WP:NPA]]. &mdash; +++$+++ I endorse the view that things are messed up around here. Carnildo's RfA was a travesty, and there is nothing I can say about Tony Sidaway's behavior of late that doesn't infringe [[WP:NPA]]. &mdash;[[User:Bunchofgrapes|Bunchofgrapes]]  ([[User talk:Bunchofgrapes|talk]]) 18:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
279648 +++$+++ Jim62sch +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279647 +++$+++ 279647 +++$+++ 2006-09-17 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.158542880E09 +++$+++ Agreed on both counts.  I'm not sure that there's anything that could be said that wouldn't be ''seen'' by the subject as a hysterical public attack.  Uh-oh, BoG, we might both be blocked now.   +++$+++ :Agreed on both counts.  I'm not sure that there's anything that could be said that wouldn't be ''seen'' by the subject as a hysterical public attack.  Uh-oh, BoG, we might both be blocked now.  [[User:Jim62sch|<font face="Times New Roman" color="FF2400">•Jim</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="F4C430">62</font><font face="Times New Roman" color="000000">sch•</font>]] 18:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
279649 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279647 +++$+++ 279648 +++$+++ 2006-09-17 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.158544260E09 +++$+++ Fuck! Hope your back from your strike soon. -- +++$+++ ::Fuck! Hope your back from your strike soon. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 18:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

279650 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-17 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.158545100E09 +++$+++ Good luck with your break.  I can't stop you going, but I think I am staying for the time being, in an effort to try to counterbalance the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATony_Sidaway&diff=76212691&oldid=76181471 prevailing idiocy].  I think [[User:Geogre|Geogre]]'s [[WP:IAA]] must be the way forward.  Please come back in a month - enough good people have left already. --  +++$+++ Good luck with your break.  I can't stop you going, but I think I am staying for the time being, in an effort to try to counterbalance the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATony_Sidaway&diff=76212691&oldid=76181471 prevailing idiocy].  I think [[User:Geogre|Geogre]]'s [[WP:IAA]] must be the way forward.  Please come back in a month - enough good people have left already. -- [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 19:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
279651 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279650 +++$+++ 279650 +++$+++ 2006-09-17 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.158552720E09 +++$+++ I understand your decision Paul, and I also am worried by what's being done to some of our very best editors. Like ALoan and all of us, neither I can stop you from going; but I can pray you to return when the month is past, for the project would be a bleaker place without a man like you.-- +++$+++ :I understand your decision Paul, and I also am worried by what's being done to some of our very best editors. Like ALoan and all of us, neither I can stop you from going; but I can pray you to return when the month is past, for the project would be a bleaker place without a man like you.--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
279652 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279650 +++$+++ 279651 +++$+++ 2006-09-18 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.158611880E09 +++$+++ I hope you'll return soon, Paul.  +++$+++ ::I hope you'll return soon, Paul. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 13:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

279653 +++$+++ Robth +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-18 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.158618960E09 +++$+++ Ah, so this is where the party is; I feel a little out of place in the illustrious company here, but I feel compelled to post here after the singularly unpleasant experience of reading over the administrators' noticeboard and several other pages just now.  Talented, committed writers are the heart of this project, especially now as issues of quality, not quantity, become paramount, and without them we cannot move forward.  This whole episode is very discouraging, but hopefully something worthwhile can come out of it.  Come back Paul, in a month or sooner; the ideal of a great free encyclopedia still deserves all of our efforts, and this project is too valuable to abandon. -- +++$+++ Ah, so this is where the party is; I feel a little out of place in the illustrious company here, but I feel compelled to post here after the singularly unpleasant experience of reading over the administrators' noticeboard and several other pages just now.  Talented, committed writers are the heart of this project, especially now as issues of quality, not quantity, become paramount, and without them we cannot move forward.  This whole episode is very discouraging, but hopefully something worthwhile can come out of it.  Come back Paul, in a month or sooner; the ideal of a great free encyclopedia still deserves all of our efforts, and this project is too valuable to abandon. --[[User:Robth|Robth]]<sup>[[User Talk:Robth|Talk]]</sup> 15:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
279654 +++$+++ Wetman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279653 +++$+++ 279653 +++$+++ 2006-09-18 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.158627180E09 +++$+++ I'm in full sympathy with Paul August's action, and yet I know it will pass quite unnoticed by Wikipedia's self-involved \"administrators\". There needs to be some kind of \"sunset law\", by which administrators must be \"re-certified\" at the end of a period: every two years at the most. -- +++$+++ :I'm in full sympathy with Paul August's action, and yet I know it will pass quite unnoticed by Wikipedia's self-involved "administrators". There needs to be some kind of "sunset law", by which administrators must be "re-certified" at the end of a period: every two years at the most. --[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] 17:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

17511 +++$+++ Sandstein +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17511 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-28 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.269808620E09 +++$+++ This is to inform you that the community has made you subject to an interaction ban as described at [[WP:RESTRICT#Placed by the Wikipedia community]], first line, as a result of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&oldid=352530863#Interaction_ban this discussion]. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ This is to inform you that the community has made you subject to an interaction ban as described at [[WP:RESTRICT#Placed by the Wikipedia community]], first line, as a result of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=352530863#Interaction_ban this discussion]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 13:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
17512 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17511 +++$+++ 17511 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.269809160E09 +++$+++ Are you the closing admin?-- +++$+++ :Are you the closing admin?--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 13:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
17513 +++$+++ Sandstein +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17511 +++$+++ 17512 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.269809700E09 +++$+++ Of the discussion imposing the restriction, yes. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::Of the discussion imposing the restriction, yes. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 13:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

17516 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17516 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-01 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.270166940E09 +++$+++ Translation: You too bro, where are you from in Israel?-- +++$+++ Translation: You too bro, where are you from in Israel?--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 17:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
17517 +++$+++ Breein1007 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17516 +++$+++ 17516 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.270167780E09 +++$+++ Sent you an answer.  +++$+++ :Sent you an answer. [[User:Breein1007|Breein1007]] ([[User talk:Breein1007|talk]]) 17:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

279661 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-16 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.161059940E09 +++$+++ Hi all, I'm back from my \"strike\". Thanks for all the kind words above. Looks like I missed a lot of things while I was gone. Giano's reincarnation, Tony and Kelly's various resignations, Geogre's proposed de-sysopping by Fred \u2026 I hardly know what to say.  +++$+++ Hi all, I'm back from my "strike". Thanks for all the kind words above. Looks like I missed a lot of things while I was gone. Giano's reincarnation, Tony and Kelly's various resignations, Geogre's proposed de-sysopping by Fred … I hardly know what to say. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|☎]] 21:39, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
279662 +++$+++ Charles Matthews +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.161061860E09 +++$+++ Welcome back, anyway.  +++$+++ :Welcome back, anyway. [[User:Charles Matthews|Charles Matthews]] 22:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
279663 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279662 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.161061980E09 +++$+++ Thanks Charles.  +++$+++ ::Thanks Charles. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|☎]] 22:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
279664 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.161066660E09 +++$+++ It is good to see you back.  I trust you had a good break? --  +++$+++ :It is good to see you back.  I trust you had a good break? -- [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 23:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
279665 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279664 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.161072180E09 +++$+++ Just ducky, thanks.  +++$+++ ::Just ducky, thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|☎]] 01:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
279666 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.161109440E09 +++$+++ I'm disgruntled, as usual, from an excess of boneheaded editors and boneheaded policies, and from a scarcity of interesting questions on the reference desk. Maybe I'll try a Wikibreak myself, when I finish up a couple of projects. -- +++$+++ : I'm disgruntled, as usual, from an excess of boneheaded editors and boneheaded policies, and from a scarcity of interesting questions on the reference desk. Maybe I'll try a Wikibreak myself, when I finish up a couple of projects. --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 11:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
279667 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279666 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.161112980E09 +++$+++ Nice to know I was missed K ;-) Thanks for the updates. Sorry to see that Chris finally left. And I hope Lethe hasn't. Otherwise it sounds like some good things (as usual) are going on. I noticed though you left out that [[0.999\u2026]] is now an FA. Is that contributing to your disgruntlement? Is there anything I can do to make you more gruntled? I won't stoop to asking interesting questions on the reference desk though. &mdash; Regards  +++$+++ ::Nice to know I was missed K ;-) Thanks for the updates. Sorry to see that Chris finally left. And I hope Lethe hasn't. Otherwise it sounds like some good things (as usual) are going on. I noticed though you left out that [[0.999…]] is now an FA. Is that contributing to your disgruntlement? Is there anything I can do to make you more gruntled? I won't stoop to asking interesting questions on the reference desk though. &mdash; Regards [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|☎]] 12:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
279668 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279667 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.161197160E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I suspect the mathematics community remains one of the happier segments of Wikipedia, and perhaps we can still have a little fun and do a little good. -- +++$+++ ::: Anyway, I suspect the mathematics community remains one of the happier segments of Wikipedia, and perhaps we can still have a little fun and do a little good. --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 11:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
279669 +++$+++ Giano II +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.161141420E09 +++$+++ Glad to se you're back. No it  is not a re-incarnation just the same old me - exactly the same in fact.  Not a lot has changed. Tell me do you play bridge or poker, I am mentally dividing people up these days - I suspect, like me,  you are a bridge player.  +++$+++ :Glad to se you're back. No it  is not a re-incarnation just the same old me - exactly the same in fact.  Not a lot has changed. Tell me do you play bridge or poker, I am mentally dividing people up these days - I suspect, like me,  you are a bridge player. [[User:Giano II|Giano]] 20:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
279670 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279669 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.161143940E09 +++$+++ Thanks Giano, welcome back to you too. Yup I play bridge. I was a fairly serious player in my college days, way back when.  By the way, I recently had an Italian volcanic adventure. I went up [[Vesuvio]], [[Etna|Mamma Etna]], and [[Stromboli]]. So I now see where your fiery Sicilian temperament comes from.  +++$+++ ::Thanks Giano, welcome back to you too. Yup I play bridge. I was a fairly serious player in my college days, way back when.  By the way, I recently had an Italian volcanic adventure. I went up [[Vesuvio]], [[Etna|Mamma Etna]], and [[Stromboli]]. So I now see where your fiery Sicilian temperament comes from. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|☎]] 20:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
279671 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279669 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.161145380E09 +++$+++ Are those two sets necessarily disjoint? --  +++$+++ ::Are those two sets necessarily disjoint? -- [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 21:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
279672 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279671 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.161146340E09 +++$+++ Being a poker player &mdash; also in my college days &mdash; as well as a mathematician I can say with authority that they are not.  +++$+++ :::Being a poker player &mdash; also in my college days &mdash; as well as a mathematician I can say with authority that they are not. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|☎]] 21:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
279673 +++$+++ Giano II +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279671 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.161146700E09 +++$+++ One bluffs and one calculates; no my temperament is not fiery at all, it is cool calm and collected at all times.  Hope you had an interesting holday Paul, and found time to look at some architecture too while you were there.  I haven't been to Pompeii for years, do they still show you the atrophied brothel? I remember a school trip to that when I was about 11, we were fascinated, it was the only thing we all wrote about afterwards in detail!  +++$+++ :::One bluffs and one calculates; no my temperament is not fiery at all, it is cool calm and collected at all times.  Hope you had an interesting holday Paul, and found time to look at some architecture too while you were there.  I haven't been to Pompeii for years, do they still show you the atrophied brothel? I remember a school trip to that when I was about 11, we were fascinated, it was the only thing we all wrote about afterwards in detail! [[User:Giano II|Giano]] 21:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
279674 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279673 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.161148440E09 +++$+++ Yes I saw these lovlies (below) at [[Paestum]], as well as the [[Villa of the Mysteries]] at Pompeii (I think I've seen the brothel before, don't remember it this time).  +++$+++ ::::Yes I saw these lovlies (below) at [[Paestum]], as well as the [[Villa of the Mysteries]] at Pompeii (I think I've seen the brothel before, don't remember it this time). [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|☎]] 22:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
279675 +++$+++ Llywrch +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.161238140E09 +++$+++ Glad to see you returned. I hope our paths cross again. --  +++$+++ : Glad to see you returned. I hope our paths cross again. -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] 23:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
279676 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279675 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.161246540E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Me too.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. Me too. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|☎]] 01:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
279677 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 279661 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.161202380E09 +++$+++ Hi Bish, How are things?  +++$+++ :Hi Bish, How are things? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|☎]] 13:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

17518 +++$+++ Abisharan +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17518 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-06 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.270601220E09 +++$+++ Hi. I am putting the question here, since it is for you and to not have to bother too much the other user. I would like to understand how people that consider those cartoons antisemitic see them. Could you please pick one or two that you find representative of this position among those at [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Carlos_Latuff commons]. And help me see it the way you see it. Also maybe I don't understand the way the word antisemitism is being used.  +++$+++ Hi. I am putting the question here, since it is for you and to not have to bother too much the other user. I would like to understand how people that consider those cartoons antisemitic see them. Could you please pick one or two that you find representative of this position among those at [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Latuff commons]. And help me see it the way you see it. Also maybe I don't understand the way the word antisemitism is being used. [[User:Abisharan|Abisharan]] ([[User talk:Abisharan|talk]]) 17:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17519 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17518 +++$+++ 17518 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.270602660E09 +++$+++ Look, he don't seem to fall into the classic Nazi-inspired caricature style where Jews are portraed with huge curved noses, huge teeth and etc. However, he constantily use images from the holocaust to emphasize that the Jews (Israeli ones, but the principle is the same) are now the Nazis and palestinians are their victims. Their are even Palestinian activists who avoid such comparison and not because they feel threatened. As I mentioned, it doesn't matter if he anti semitic or not, his works are offensive to many Jews and surely undermine Israel's rights to exist as it's the ultimative evil. There are not many conflicts in the world, if any, that are being drawned this way or even closely-and there are many bitter conflicts in the world.-- +++$+++ :Look, he don't seem to fall into the classic Nazi-inspired caricature style where Jews are portraed with huge curved noses, huge teeth and etc. However, he constantily use images from the holocaust to emphasize that the Jews (Israeli ones, but the principle is the same) are now the Nazis and palestinians are their victims. Their are even Palestinian activists who avoid such comparison and not because they feel threatened. As I mentioned, it doesn't matter if he anti semitic or not, his works are offensive to many Jews and surely undermine Israel's rights to exist as it's the ultimative evil. There are not many conflicts in the world, if any, that are being drawned this way or even closely-and there are many bitter conflicts in the world.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 18:11, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17520 +++$+++ Abisharan +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17518 +++$+++ 17519 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.270607460E09 +++$+++ I agree with it being offensive. And if I were him, in order to be fair I would also criticize suicide bombings etc. The thing is that one can defend Israel's right to exist but it is blind not to see that some have used that right for darker purposes (for US it is a business in which gain money and influence in the region) and have imposed that right in criminal ways. I am not sure why Mbz1 is so wounded (I know only some of the story visible in Wikipedia and it might be more in real life) but certainly the way she is approaching it, being stubborn, attacking everyone, being proud, behaving like a holy warrior ... is only bringing more problems (mainly for her) as it always do. I have no idea about User:RolandR's real positions but, taking it in abstract, the combination of a Jew (which I assume would feel joy by the creation of a Jew state, of the promised land ...) criticizing those who are doing it by criminal means is something that I think deserves respect and a minute of meditation. Not a bitter reaction as coming from a wounded beast. Because that's what happens when you have a wounded beast that have made a schist to protect itself from everyone else, indiscriminate attacks to all that come too close. She is, in general behaving stupidly. Like that \"Let them have it their way\", assuming everyone means an attack to Jews. I have many good friends that are Jew and who also see the IP-conflict as a stupid one being increased by many greedy (not referencing to Jews but to US interests and Arab interests) influences. One thing is true about that post of her. And that is that better and more important is a good picture of a pepper; and that is what she should be doing instead. That is she is good at, in taking pictures, instead of dealing with a topic in which she have shown being too blind and too biased.  +++$+++ :* I agree with it being offensive. And if I were him, in order to be fair I would also criticize suicide bombings etc. The thing is that one can defend Israel's right to exist but it is blind not to see that some have used that right for darker purposes (for US it is a business in which gain money and influence in the region) and have imposed that right in criminal ways. I am not sure why Mbz1 is so wounded (I know only some of the story visible in Wikipedia and it might be more in real life) but certainly the way she is approaching it, being stubborn, attacking everyone, being proud, behaving like a holy warrior ... is only bringing more problems (mainly for her) as it always do. I have no idea about User:RolandR's real positions but, taking it in abstract, the combination of a Jew (which I assume would feel joy by the creation of a Jew state, of the promised land ...) criticizing those who are doing it by criminal means is something that I think deserves respect and a minute of meditation. Not a bitter reaction as coming from a wounded beast. Because that's what happens when you have a wounded beast that have made a schist to protect itself from everyone else, indiscriminate attacks to all that come too close. She is, in general behaving stupidly. Like that "Let them have it their way", assuming everyone means an attack to Jews. I have many good friends that are Jew and who also see the IP-conflict as a stupid one being increased by many greedy (not referencing to Jews but to US interests and Arab interests) influences. One thing is true about that post of her. And that is that better and more important is a good picture of a pepper; and that is what she should be doing instead. That is she is good at, in taking pictures, instead of dealing with a topic in which she have shown being too blind and too biased. [[User:Abisharan|Abisharan]] ([[User talk:Abisharan|talk]]) 19:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17521 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17518 +++$+++ 17519 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.270609260E09 +++$+++ Abisharan, can I assume from you name that you're Iranian? ust asking, would be very interesting if you are! ( I met many abroad). The Israeli-Arab conflict is a result of many things, but I have no doubt that things could be different even with a Jewish state standing where it's now. I obviousely don't know in details what RolandR opinions are about the existence of Israel, I may assume what they are from my acquaintanceship with few radical left wing marxist Jews living in Israel, but I can't speak for him. You asumption that Jew who self identify himself as Jewish identify with the idea of a Jewish state or feel proud for it even when he's in the most left wing location on the political map, is wrong. There are Jews who call to the dismantlement of Israel, there are also [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neturei_Karta#Relations_with_Iran_and_President_Mahmoud_Ahmedinejad those] who represent a small monority but can demonstrate my point. Personally I have reasons to believe that the conflict is mainly a cultural one and that with most Arab nations peace could been achieved in totaly different ways than  were suggested until today. As for Mbz1, don't disconnect her from the context she was acting in. She many times push back against other editors who are harsh with her. There are many stubborn editors on the I-P issue. It's ten, if not hundred, times harder to insert any change, even minor, to any article on the I-P issue than on American politics and certainly than on scientific subjects. There is almost not even single day without board or admin getting involved, one group of editors revert the other group on the same sentence  and so forth. So, blaming her, and crown her with these titles is incorrect-it's a very frustrating topic, and seemingly, everybody have their breakpoints. What can we do that this points are not acknowledged  by wikipedia guidelines and it not even provide a spa or something to cool down..-- +++$+++ ::Abisharan, can I assume from you name that you're Iranian? ust asking, would be very interesting if you are! ( I met many abroad). The Israeli-Arab conflict is a result of many things, but I have no doubt that things could be different even with a Jewish state standing where it's now. I obviousely don't know in details what RolandR opinions are about the existence of Israel, I may assume what they are from my acquaintanceship with few radical left wing marxist Jews living in Israel, but I can't speak for him. You asumption that Jew who self identify himself as Jewish identify with the idea of a Jewish state or feel proud for it even when he's in the most left wing location on the political map, is wrong. There are Jews who call to the dismantlement of Israel, there are also [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neturei_Karta#Relations_with_Iran_and_President_Mahmoud_Ahmedinejad those] who represent a small monority but can demonstrate my point. Personally I have reasons to believe that the conflict is mainly a cultural one and that with most Arab nations peace could been achieved in totaly different ways than  were suggested until today. As for Mbz1, don't disconnect her from the context she was acting in. She many times push back against other editors who are harsh with her. There are many stubborn editors on the I-P issue. It's ten, if not hundred, times harder to insert any change, even minor, to any article on the I-P issue than on American politics and certainly than on scientific subjects. There is almost not even single day without board or admin getting involved, one group of editors revert the other group on the same sentence  and so forth. So, blaming her, and crown her with these titles is incorrect-it's a very frustrating topic, and seemingly, everybody have their breakpoints. What can we do that this points are not acknowledged  by wikipedia guidelines and it not even provide a spa or something to cool down..--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 20:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

541807 +++$+++ Belovedfreak +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-27 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.267320780E09 +++$+++ Hello Fordmadoxfraud, just to let you know the reason that I removed links at [[Amastris (disambiguation)]] is because disambiguation pages should only have 1 blue link per item, to help readers easily find the article they are looking for. For more info, see [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)]]. Regards, -- +++$+++ Hello Fordmadoxfraud, just to let you know the reason that I removed links at [[Amastris (disambiguation)]] is because disambiguation pages should only have 1 blue link per item, to help readers easily find the article they are looking for. For more info, see [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)]]. Regards, --[[User:Belovedfreak|<span style="color:#4682B4; font-family: trebuchet">Beloved</span>]][[User talk:Belovedfreak|<span style="color:#008B8B; font-family: trebuchet">Freak</span>]] 17:33, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
541808 +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541807 +++$+++ 541807 +++$+++ 2010-02-27 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.267321080E09 +++$+++ That's cool.  But in the case of some of the non-blue-linked items, where dab pages like this cross-over in function to that of a list, and the items take the place of articles that are too small or insignificant to be replaced, the further terms (e.g. [[Tiribazus]]) ought to be linked as well, as we would in any article.  Linking only to the first linkable term isn't really helpful in cases like those.  Cheers.   +++$+++ :That's cool.  But in the case of some of the non-blue-linked items, where dab pages like this cross-over in function to that of a list, and the items take the place of articles that are too small or insignificant to be replaced, the further terms (e.g. [[Tiribazus]]) ought to be linked as well, as we would in any article.  Linking only to the first linkable term isn't really helpful in cases like those.  Cheers.  [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] ([[User talk:Fordmadoxfraud#top|talk]]) 17:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

602887 +++$+++ This, that and the other +++$+++ Sade +++$+++ 602887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-12 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.294852860E09 +++$+++ [[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Lipsum2]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Lipsum2|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> \u2014 <span style=\"border:dashed #666;border-width:1px 0 0 1px\"> +++$+++ [[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Lipsum2]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Lipsum2|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> — <span style="border:dashed #666;border-width:1px 0 0 1px">[[User:This, that and the other|This, that]]</span>, and <span style="border:dashed #666;border-width:0 1px 1px 0">[[User talk:This, that and the other|the other<small> (talk)</small>]]</span> 09:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
602888 +++$+++ 70.90.186.145 +++$+++ Sade +++$+++ 602887 +++$+++ 602887 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.296285360E09 +++$+++ Why are u not at Wikicities anymore? You created The Pokemon Encyclopedia! [[Special:Contributions\/70.90.186.145|70.90.186.145]] ( +++$+++ :Why are u not at Wikicities anymore? You created The Pokemon Encyclopedia! [[Special:Contributions/70.90.186.145|70.90.186.145]] ([[User talk:70.90.186.145|talk]]) 23:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

17523 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-06 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.270603260E09 +++$+++ Better take a look at a small wonder I found yesterday, when I was preparing the salad [[:File:Baby Bell pepper Capsicum annuum.jpg]] :) I am never getting tired of the amazing shapes the Nature has to offer.-- +++$+++ Better take a look at a small wonder I found yesterday, when I was preparing the salad [[:File:Baby Bell pepper Capsicum annuum.jpg]] :) I am never getting tired of the amazing shapes the Nature has to offer.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 18:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17524 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.270604040E09 +++$+++ Wow, swan -sweet papper...Photography is amazing occupation, it always give you a sense of traveling!-- +++$+++ ::Wow, swan -sweet papper...Photography is amazing occupation, it always give you a sense of traveling!--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 18:34, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17525 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.270604400E09 +++$+++ It is interesting that you saw the swan too as I did. I read somewhere that people usually see different things in natural shapes, for example in clouds.-- +++$+++ :::It is interesting that you saw the swan too as I did. I read somewhere that people usually see different things in natural shapes, for example in clouds.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 18:40, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17526 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.270604580E09 +++$+++ What, like [[Rorschach test|here]]? (well, not natural, but close :))-- +++$+++ :::What, like [[Rorschach test|here]]? (well, not natural, but close :))--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 18:43, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17527 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.270605120E09 +++$+++ You are really into that, aren't you. BTW congratulation on your DYK! Well done!-- +++$+++ ::::You are really into that, aren't you. BTW congratulation on your DYK! Well done!--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 18:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

17528 +++$+++ Breein1007 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-06 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.270615380E09 +++$+++ It takes a special type of person to claim offense to a line from the Talmud. I got quite a laugh today!!!  +++$+++ It takes a special type of person to claim offense to a line from the Talmud. I got quite a laugh today!!! [[User:Breein1007|Breein1007]] ([[User talk:Breein1007|talk]]) 21:43, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17529 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17528 +++$+++ 17528 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.270615620E09 +++$+++ I thought it's from the Bible. Anyway, just find out that it refer not just to Amalek (\u05e2\u05de\u05dc\u05e7) but to [[Haman (Bible)|Haman]]...Very offensive indeed.-- +++$+++ :I thought it's from the Bible. Anyway, just find out that it refer not just to Amalek (עמלק) but to [[Haman (Bible)|Haman]]...Very offensive indeed.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 21:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17530 +++$+++ Breein1007 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17528 +++$+++ 17529 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.270615980E09 +++$+++ Nope... somewhere in Talmud. Let me see if I can find it somewhere... here's a link: [http:\/\/he.wikisource.org\/wiki\/\u05d1\u05d1\u05d0_\u05d1\u05ea\u05e8\u05d0_\u05e7\u05db\u05d2_\u05d1]. Hahahaha oh no!!! Poor Edom. What if one of them comes on Wikipedia and sees your message? Ridiculous lol but somehow not surprising...  +++$+++ ::Nope... somewhere in Talmud. Let me see if I can find it somewhere... here's a link: [http://he.wikisource.org/wiki/בבא_בתרא_קכג_ב]. Hahahaha oh no!!! Poor Edom. What if one of them comes on Wikipedia and sees your message? Ridiculous lol but somehow not surprising... [[User:Breein1007|Breein1007]] ([[User talk:Breein1007|talk]]) 21:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

17531 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-06 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.270616700E09 +++$+++ Translation: \"And when Rachel gave birth to Joseph and so forth, she asked Jacob what will happen as she understand that she also gave birth to Joseph hater (Esua)-Then Jacob told her that Esau offsprings are to be defeated by Joseph offsprings..And the house of Joseph shell be flame and Esua's  straw....And they bitten Amalek\" (Sorry the translation is realy hard-you need someone with better English than mine and with better Aramic knowledge).-- +++$+++ Translation: "And when Rachel gave birth to Joseph and so forth, she asked Jacob what will happen as she understand that she also gave birth to Joseph hater (Esua)-Then Jacob told her that Esau offsprings are to be defeated by Joseph offsprings..And the house of Joseph shell be flame and Esua's  straw....And they bitten Amalek" (Sorry the translation is realy hard-you need someone with better English than mine and with better Aramic knowledge).--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 22:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17532 +++$+++ Breein1007 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17531 +++$+++ 17531 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.270617000E09 +++$+++ The sentence in question is more accurately: \"Jacob, our father, saw that Esau's seed could not be delivered by any except Joseph's seed.\"  +++$+++ :The sentence in question is more accurately: "Jacob, our father, saw that Esau's seed could not be delivered by any except Joseph's seed." [[User:Breein1007|Breein1007]] ([[User talk:Breein1007|talk]]) 22:10, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17533 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17531 +++$+++ 17532 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.270617240E09 +++$+++ Yeah I know (but couldn't put it into words like you), but complete the entire pharagraph above if you can..-- +++$+++ ::Yeah I know (but couldn't put it into words like you), but complete the entire pharagraph above if you can..--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 22:14, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17534 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17531 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.270617300E09 +++$+++ {{ec}} It's been a long time since I read Talmud, but I had already found a [http:\/\/www.israelect.com\/Come-and-Hear\/bababathra\/bababathra_123.html#PARTb translation], thank you. \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ ::::{{ec}} It's been a long time since I read Talmud, but I had already found a [http://www.israelect.com/Come-and-Hear/bababathra/bababathra_123.html#PARTb translation], thank you. —&nbsp;[[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 22:15, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

541820 +++$+++ VernoWhitney +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541820 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-19 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.276988640E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/Fordmadoxfraud|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/Fordmadoxfraud|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 16:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
541821 +++$+++ VernoWhitney +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541820 +++$+++ 541820 +++$+++ 2010-06-24 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.277424960E09 +++$+++ Since you have asserted it as being an federal mugshot, I have now tagged it as no source since I see no evidence supporting that since the article only mentions him serving time at Indiana State Prison and Ohio State Prison, not federal.  +++$+++ :Since you have asserted it as being an federal mugshot, I have now tagged it as no source since I see no evidence supporting that since the article only mentions him serving time at Indiana State Prison and Ohio State Prison, not federal. [[User:VernoWhitney|VernoWhitney]] ([[User talk:VernoWhitney|talk]]) 17:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
541822 +++$+++ Tenebrae +++$+++ Fordmadoxfraud +++$+++ 541820 +++$+++ 541820 +++$+++ 2010-06-30 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.277958480E09 +++$+++ Your input, as an editor involved in the deletion discussion, is invited at [[Talk:Fictional history of Spider-Man#Rewrite and replacement]]. -- +++$+++ :Your input, as an editor involved in the deletion discussion, is invited at [[Talk:Fictional history of Spider-Man#Rewrite and replacement]]. --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 21:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

279678 +++$+++ Pawl Kennedy +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-18 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.161217800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for putting the correct symbol for proper superset in [[Subset]]. I'm glad that someone knew where to find it; as my note on the [[Talk:Subset#Wrong symbol for proper superset?|Discussion]] page said, I was making the best correction that I could in the interim...  +++$+++ Thanks for putting the correct symbol for proper superset in [[Subset]]. I'm glad that someone knew where to find it; as my note on the [[Talk:Subset#Wrong symbol for proper superset?|Discussion]] page said, I was making the best correction that I could in the interim... [[User:Pawl Kennedy|Pawl]] 17:30, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
279679 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279678 +++$+++ 279678 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.161217860E09 +++$+++ You're welcome.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|☎]] 17:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
279680 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279678 +++$+++ 279678 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.161642840E09 +++$+++ This is the edit I reverted: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Cleopatra_VII_of_Egypt&diff=82449650&oldid=82436357]). It made several novel assertions about Cleopatra's death, without providing any sources, for those assertions (see [[WP:V]]). So I reverted it as \"unsourced speculation\". If you want to discuss this further the best place to do so is at [[Talk:Cleopatra_VII_of_Egypt]]. Regards,  +++$+++ :This is the edit I reverted: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cleopatra_VII_of_Egypt&diff=82449650&oldid=82436357]). It made several novel assertions about Cleopatra's death, without providing any sources, for those assertions (see [[WP:V]]). So I reverted it as "unsourced speculation". If you want to discuss this further the best place to do so is at [[Talk:Cleopatra_VII_of_Egypt]]. Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|☎]] 15:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

17535 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17535 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-06 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.270617540E09 +++$+++ This is one example that the sentence refer to Amalek, in the original sentence written in Aramic, above, the link is much more direct. Just give it up. Regards!-- +++$+++ This is one example that the sentence refer to Amalek, in the original sentence written in Aramic, above, the link is much more direct. Just give it up. Regards!--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 22:19, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17536 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17535 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.270617660E09 +++$+++ I believe you're being disingenuous, but I've dropped it. \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ ::I believe you're being disingenuous, but I've dropped it. —&nbsp;[[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 22:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
17537 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17535 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-07 06:23:00 +++$+++ 1.270646580E09 +++$+++ You believe that I'm disingenuous? I'm..OK,  it's very offensive when it comes from you. I think that adpoting higher standards of AGF is a good idea, because the same way you walk in (i.e., ABF without no reason) I can assume that you just want to turn the fire to me in any case. I provide adequate evidence to refute your allegations but you seem to insist that my reference to Esau seed is outside of this phrase and outside the scope of what he symbolize. Whatever your reasons are, you are wrong!-- +++$+++ :::You believe that I'm disingenuous? I'm..OK,  it's very offensive when it comes from you. I think that adpoting higher standards of AGF is a good idea, because the same way you walk in (i.e., ABF without no reason) I can assume that you just want to turn the fire to me in any case. I provide adequate evidence to refute your allegations but you seem to insist that my reference to Esau seed is outside of this phrase and outside the scope of what he symbolize. Whatever your reasons are, you are wrong!--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 06:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

480681 +++$+++ Mtking +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-18 06:54:00 +++$+++ 1.300456440E09 +++$+++ Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  +++$+++ Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. [[User:Mtking|Mtking]] ([[User talk:Mtking|talk]]) 06:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
480682 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480681 +++$+++ 480681 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.300459860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note, but I just fixed a dablink on it. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the note, but I just fixed a dablink on it. --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 07:51, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

17538 +++$+++ Beeblebrox +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-18 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.271640900E09 +++$+++ I finally got what you were trying to tell me, that you are under the same interaction ban as Factomancer, and that your initiation of a discussion about them and your pestering me to block them were violations of said ban. Thanks for pointing that out, sorry it took me so long to figure out that I should block you. Now please don't violate your topic ban again.  +++$+++ I finally got what you were trying to tell me, that you are under the same interaction ban as Factomancer, and that your initiation of a discussion about them and your pestering me to block them were violations of said ban. Thanks for pointing that out, sorry it took me so long to figure out that I should block you. Now please don't violate your topic ban again. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 18:35, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
17539 +++$+++ Breein1007 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17538 +++$+++ 17538 +++$+++ 2010-04-18 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.271644320E09 +++$+++ Hi achi, I suggest you appeal this irresponsible action by Beeblebrox. He has blocked you for reporting Factomancer's violation in the appropriate manner. According to his words, he believes that reporting another editor for a violation of the interaction ban is in itself a violation. That is false. If anything, the block should be overturned in principle and so that it does not smear your block log.  +++$+++ :Hi achi, I suggest you appeal this irresponsible action by Beeblebrox. He has blocked you for reporting Factomancer's violation in the appropriate manner. According to his words, he believes that reporting another editor for a violation of the interaction ban is in itself a violation. That is false. If anything, the block should be overturned in principle and so that it does not smear your block log. [[User:Breein1007|Breein1007]] ([[User talk:Breein1007|talk]]) 19:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
17540 +++$+++ No More Mr Nice Guy +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17538 +++$+++ 17539 +++$+++ 2010-04-18 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.271645520E09 +++$+++ Agreed. He apparently didn't read the whole ban. Appeal it so it's not in your block log.  +++$+++ ::Agreed. He apparently didn't read the whole ban. Appeal it so it's not in your block log. [[User:No More Mr Nice Guy|No More Mr Nice Guy]] ([[User talk:No More Mr Nice Guy|talk]]) 19:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
17541 +++$+++ Bwilkins +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17538 +++$+++ 17540 +++$+++ 2010-04-19 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.271694720E09 +++$+++ Appealing will not remove it from the block log, and [[WP:AGF|snarky commentary about the blocking admin]] will ensure the block continues - might want to rethink that (see [[WP:BLOCK]] and [[WP:GAB]]) ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">talk\u2192<\/font>]]<span style=\"border:1px solid black;\">'''&nbsp; +++$+++ ::: Appealing will not remove it from the block log, and [[WP:AGF|snarky commentary about the blocking admin]] will ensure the block continues - might want to rethink that (see [[WP:BLOCK]] and [[WP:GAB]]) ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">'''&nbsp;[[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]]&nbsp;'''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</font>]]) 09:32, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

279684 +++$+++ Trialsanderrors +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-25 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.161827100E09 +++$+++ I believe you wanted to !vote ''delete'', right? ~  +++$+++ I believe you wanted to !vote ''delete'', right? ~ [[User:Trialsanderrors|trialsanderrors]] 18:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
279685 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279684 +++$+++ 279684 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.161827280E09 +++$+++ Yes thanks for catching that and pointing that out to me.  +++$+++ :Yes thanks for catching that and pointing that out to me. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|☎]] 18:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

279686 +++$+++ Rbj +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-30 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.162276020E09 +++$+++ the two mathematical statements that you changed are true only because of their definition.  there is no other reason for equality there other than equivalence.  (you can answer here or the article [[Talk:Analytic signal|talk page]], i'm watching both.)  +++$+++ the two mathematical statements that you changed are true only because of their definition.  there is no other reason for equality there other than equivalence.  (you can answer here or the article [[Talk:Analytic signal|talk page]], i'm watching both.) [[User:Rbj|r b-j]] 22:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
279687 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279686 +++$+++ 279686 +++$+++ 2006-10-31 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.162342920E09 +++$+++ Hi r b-j, I've copied your question to [[Talk:Analytic signal|talk page]], and replied there.  +++$+++ :Hi r b-j, I've copied your question to [[Talk:Analytic signal|talk page]], and replied there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

541831 +++$+++ Mahanga +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541831 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-17 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.176858120E09 +++$+++ I have been looking for someone who I can Adopt. I think that you could be the right person. If you agree, post a message on my [[User talk:Mahanga]]. <span class=\"sigInvitatious\"> +++$+++ I have been looking for someone who I can Adopt. I think that you could be the right person. If you agree, post a message on my [[User talk:Mahanga]]. <span class="sigInvitatious">[[User:Mahanga|Mahanga]]<sup>[[User talk:Mahanga|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]</sup></span> 18:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
541832 +++$+++ Mahanga +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541831 +++$+++ 541831 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.176869880E09 +++$+++ Great! Let me know if you have any questions. I noticed you were editing your monobook.js. Were you having problems or were you just testing it out? If you're interested, I encourage you to check out some of these links and see if they pique your interest. Cheers! <span class=\"sigInvitatious\"> +++$+++ :Great! Let me know if you have any questions. I noticed you were editing your monobook.js. Were you having problems or were you just testing it out? If you're interested, I encourage you to check out some of these links and see if they pique your interest. Cheers! <span class="sigInvitatious">[[User:Mahanga|Mahanga]]<sup>[[User talk:Mahanga|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]</sup></span> 21:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
541833 +++$+++ Mahanga +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541831 +++$+++ 541832 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.176885060E09 +++$+++ Probably the first question I should've asked, but how comfortable are you in editing Wikipedia? <span class=\"sigInvitatious\"> +++$+++ ::Probably the first question I should've asked, but how comfortable are you in editing Wikipedia? <span class="sigInvitatious">[[User:Mahanga|Mahanga]]<sup>[[User talk:Mahanga|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]</sup></span> 01:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

17544 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-19 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.271681460E09 +++$+++ I'm not under \"topic ban\" and I didn't violate the interaction ban[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:RESTRICT#Placed_by_the_Wikipedia_community]-I didn't discuss about the other party at all[ http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABeeblebrox&action=historysubmit&diff=356846419&oldid=356175471]. Only complaint about violation of the interaction ban according to the terms of it-that's why I got blocked [ http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Beeblebrox&diff=prev&oldid=356828374 ]-But I'm '''allowed''' to report on interaction ban violation to uninvolved admin at least 12 hours from the time of the violation, that's what I did. I sent a request to be unblock and to the block to be removed from my log to the blocking admin as well. Please lift this blocked and remove it from my log of blocks.-- +++$+++ I'm not under "topic ban" and I didn't violate the interaction ban[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RESTRICT#Placed_by_the_Wikipedia_community]-I didn't discuss about the other party at all[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABeeblebrox&action=historysubmit&diff=356846419&oldid=356175471]. Only complaint about violation of the interaction ban according to the terms of it-that's why I got blocked [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beeblebrox&diff=prev&oldid=356828374 ]-But I'm '''allowed''' to report on interaction ban violation to uninvolved admin at least 12 hours from the time of the violation, that's what I did. I sent a request to be unblock and to the block to be removed from my log to the blocking admin as well. Please lift this blocked and remove it from my log of blocks.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 05:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
17545 +++$+++ Beeblebrox +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17544 +++$+++ 17544 +++$+++ 2010-04-19 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.271714220E09 +++$+++ Despite the giant loophole built into the interaction ban, it also says \"''Repeated spurious reports to administrators using this mechanism shall be grounds for blocking for disruption.''\" You pestered me about this for two days, and the ban also says it is to be broadly interpreted.  +++$+++ *Despite the giant loophole built into the interaction ban, it also says "''Repeated spurious reports to administrators using this mechanism shall be grounds for blocking for disruption.''" You pestered me about this for two days, and the ban also says it is to be broadly interpreted. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 14:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
17546 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17544 +++$+++ 17544 +++$+++ 2010-04-19 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.271718900E09 +++$+++ '''Support unblock''' At first I looked at how many messages Gilisa left at the blocking admin's talk page, and I thought the block was justified, but when I read the messages, I have changed my opinion. Gilisa reported the other party only once, no rules of the interaction ban were violated. Thank you.-- +++$+++ *'''Support unblock''' At first I looked at how many messages Gilisa left at the blocking admin's talk page, and I thought the block was justified, but when I read the messages, I have changed my opinion. Gilisa reported the other party only once, no rules of the interaction ban were violated. Thank you.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 16:15, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
17547 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17544 +++$+++ 17546 +++$+++ 2010-04-19 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.271714580E09 +++$+++ Oh no, I didn't \"pester\" you(and as I already wrote this word is annoying me, you may stop using it so frequently-but good to know that you now find other \"reason\" which is again not supported by the interaction ban terms nor applied to me in this case)-I reported only once and then asked you if I can address the issue to other admin -because '''you''' wrote yourself you didn't feel right to deal with the subject. You only replied this once  and I didn't ask you again to enforce it. I did asked, after the interaction ban was enforced and before my blocked (clearly not asking you to enforce anything), how come you are not familiar with my interaction ban details (you said so spcifically after I asked you if it wouldn't be a violation to address other admin) -simply because it's <s>abit<\/s> absurd that one who handle with interaction ban enforcment in which I'm a side myself and is expected to have full understanding of it-actually don't know the details of my interaction ban (and it seem you don't). In any case, I will take it to [[WP:RAFR]] shortly after the blocked is over. This wrong judgment of yours is not going to smear my block log. Your argument regarding that the ban is to be \"broadly interpreted\" and hence it justify this blocked somehow is just unlinked. P.s. It would be apprecitated if avoid yourself from commenting on my talk page for now -- +++$+++ ::Oh no, I didn't "pester" you(and as I already wrote this word is annoying me, you may stop using it so frequently-but good to know that you now find other "reason" which is again not supported by the interaction ban terms nor applied to me in this case)-I reported only once and then asked you if I can address the issue to other admin -because '''you''' wrote yourself you didn't feel right to deal with the subject. You only replied this once  and I didn't ask you again to enforce it. I did asked, after the interaction ban was enforced and before my blocked (clearly not asking you to enforce anything), how come you are not familiar with my interaction ban details (you said so spcifically after I asked you if it wouldn't be a violation to address other admin) -simply because it's <s>abit</s> absurd that one who handle with interaction ban enforcment in which I'm a side myself and is expected to have full understanding of it-actually don't know the details of my interaction ban (and it seem you don't). In any case, I will take it to [[WP:RAFR]] shortly after the blocked is over. This wrong judgment of yours is not going to smear my block log. Your argument regarding that the ban is to be "broadly interpreted" and hence it justify this blocked somehow is just unlinked. P.s. It would be apprecitated if avoid yourself from commenting on my talk page for now --[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 15:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

279690 +++$+++ Gracenotes +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-07 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.162959180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for editing Element. Really. It's a bit below par, and could a bit of content. However, I noted that you replaced <math>\\in<\/math> with &isin;. On IE (the browser that I use at school; I use Firefox at home), the latter is displayed as box: it's an unsupported character. So, if you have no objections, I'd like to change it back so that on all browsers, the true symbol is displayed. Is that OK? -- +++$+++ Thanks for editing Element. Really. It's a bit below par, and could a bit of content. However, I noted that you replaced <math>\in</math> with &isin;. On IE (the browser that I use at school; I use Firefox at home), the latter is displayed as box: it's an unsupported character. So, if you have no objections, I'd like to change it back so that on all browsers, the true symbol is displayed. Is that OK? --[[User:Gracenotes|<font color="#996600">Grace</font><font color="black">notes</font>]] <sup><font color="#996600">[[User talk:Gracenotes|T]]</font></sup> &#167; 20:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
279691 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279690 +++$+++ 279690 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.162959540E09 +++$+++ OK.  +++$+++ :OK. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

279692 +++$+++ Andrew Dalby +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-08 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.163029800E09 +++$+++ All praise for restoring the lost bit of text (with footnote link) about Prosymnus. <font color=\"green\">[[User:Andrew Dalby|And]]<\/font>'''[[User Talk:Andrew Dalby|rew D]]'''<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ All praise for restoring the lost bit of text (with footnote link) about Prosymnus. <font color="green">[[User:Andrew Dalby|And]]</font>'''[[User Talk:Andrew Dalby|rew D]]'''<font color="green">[[User:Andrew Dalby/Bibliography|alby]]</font> 15:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
279693 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279692 +++$+++ 279692 +++$+++ 2006-11-08 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.163030580E09 +++$+++ Aww shucks twern't nothin.  +++$+++ :Aww shucks twern't nothin. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

17550 +++$+++ Hersfold +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-19 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.271736000E09 +++$+++ There is no appeal process for this; while the technical ability to remove the log entry exists, using that tool to delete a block log entry is considered abuse of the tool (see [[Wikipedia:Revision deletion#Log redaction]]). I would strongly recommend you drop the matter, especially given the reason for your block. I did note, however, that the blocking administrator seems to have opened a discussion on ANI about the clause of the ban that led to your block; you may want to participate there at [[WP:ANI#Interaction ban needs tweaking]]. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue\">Hers<\/em><em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold\">fold<\/em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold\/t|t]]\/ +++$+++ There is no appeal process for this; while the technical ability to remove the log entry exists, using that tool to delete a block log entry is considered abuse of the tool (see [[Wikipedia:Revision deletion#Log redaction]]). I would strongly recommend you drop the matter, especially given the reason for your block. I did note, however, that the blocking administrator seems to have opened a discussion on ANI about the clause of the ban that led to your block; you may want to participate there at [[WP:ANI#Interaction ban needs tweaking]]. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold</em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold/t|t]]/[[User:Hersfold/a|a]]/[[Special:Contributions/Hersfold|c]])</sup> 21:00, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
17551 +++$+++ Hersfold +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17550 +++$+++ 17550 +++$+++ 2010-04-19 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.271736120E09 +++$+++ In case you're wondering, I have no opinion on the status of the block; in all honesty, I only briefly skimmed this page before removing your unblock request. I have a script that told me you were unblocked before I opened your talk page. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue\">Hers<\/em><em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold\">fold<\/em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold\/t|t]]\/ +++$+++ :In case you're wondering, I have no opinion on the status of the block; in all honesty, I only briefly skimmed this page before removing your unblock request. I have a script that told me you were unblocked before I opened your talk page. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold</em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold/t|t]]/[[User:Hersfold/a|a]]/[[Special:Contributions/Hersfold|c]])</sup> 21:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

17552 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-20 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.271765880E09 +++$+++ Hi Gilisa, please see the image of an interaction ban I took two days ago [[:File:Pond turtles and mallard duck in Golden Gate park 1.jpg]] :) Best wishes.-- +++$+++ Hi Gilisa, please see the image of an interaction ban I took two days ago [[:File:Pond turtles and mallard duck in Golden Gate park 1.jpg]] :) Best wishes.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 05:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
17553 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17552 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-20 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.271773680E09 +++$+++ This picture describe the ban \"letters\" but not the ban \"spirit\". But in any case, it show how talented you are :)-- +++$+++ ::This picture describe the ban "letters" but not the ban "spirit". But in any case, it show how talented you are :)--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 07:28, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

17554 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-21 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.271906220E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Gilabrand#Rhyme_exercise_with_the_word_.22ban.22] :)-- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gilabrand#Rhyme_exercise_with_the_word_.22ban.22] :)--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 20:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
17555 +++$+++ Breein1007 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17554 +++$+++ 17554 +++$+++ 2010-05-26 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.274931120E09 +++$+++ And as such, since ChrisO is not an administrator, this notice is not effective and I have removed it from the log.  +++$+++ :And as such, since ChrisO is not an administrator, this notice is not effective and I have removed it from the log. [[User:Breein1007|Breein1007]] ([[User talk:Breein1007|talk]]) 20:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
17556 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17554 +++$+++ 17555 +++$+++ 2010-05-26 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.274932500E09 +++$+++ Don't make an ass of yourself. The notice is effective. \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Don't make an ass of yourself. The notice is effective. —&nbsp;[[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 20:55, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
17557 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17554 +++$+++ 17554 +++$+++ 2010-05-26 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.274935020E09 +++$+++ In relation to the above, you are informed that the [[Richard Goldstone]] article is under a blanket 1RR restriction and violations of this restriction will result in escalating blocks and\/or topic\/page bans. Thank you for your cooperation.  +++$+++ *In relation to the above, you are informed that the [[Richard Goldstone]] article is under a blanket 1RR restriction and violations of this restriction will result in escalating blocks and/or topic/page bans. Thank you for your cooperation. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  21:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
17558 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17554 +++$+++ 17554 +++$+++ 2010-05-27 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.274985000E09 +++$+++ You wellcome, but I don't realy interested in editing there. However, if you already here, there is a problem of removed information that was cited with reliable sources that were removed, also, without  proper process. Although the majority of editors on the relevant article TP may support these edits, they does not meet the five pillars of WP and I guess that sysop intervation is required not only in imposing edit restrictions, but also in evaluating issues concern with content-such as enforcing WP:UNDUE and so forth. Just suggesting. Regards-- +++$+++ :You wellcome, but I don't realy interested in editing there. However, if you already here, there is a problem of removed information that was cited with reliable sources that were removed, also, without  proper process. Although the majority of editors on the relevant article TP may support these edits, they does not meet the five pillars of WP and I guess that sysop intervation is required not only in imposing edit restrictions, but also in evaluating issues concern with content-such as enforcing WP:UNDUE and so forth. Just suggesting. Regards--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 11:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

614595 +++$+++ Jreferee +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614595 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-22 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.161552780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the adoption.  As you can see from [[User_talk:Jreferee]], the Wikipedia bots are comming at me from all sides and need some help in fighting them off.  Can you tell me why it deleted the List of Clergy page (or direct me to how I can ask someone about this.)  Also, oneminor point, why do my user page and discussion page show the same thing?  I tried to make my user page look like yours, but my discussion page changed, too.  Can you help me fix this?  TIA --  +++$+++ Thanks for the adoption.  As you can see from [[User_talk:Jreferee]], the Wikipedia bots are comming at me from all sides and need some help in fighting them off.  Can you tell me why it deleted the List of Clergy page (or direct me to how I can ask someone about this.)  Also, oneminor point, why do my user page and discussion page show the same thing?  I tried to make my user page look like yours, but my discussion page changed, too.  Can you help me fix this?  TIA -- [[User:Jreferee|Jreferee]] 14:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
614596 +++$+++ Marialadouce +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614595 +++$+++ 614595 +++$+++ 2006-10-22 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.161566280E09 +++$+++ Hello, Daniel! I, too, thank you for the adoption. I promise to work hard to improve Wikipedia. The problem is that I don't really know what I can work on. I joined Wikipedia at the beginning of the year and for many months was too shy and bewildered to really do much. I can more or less find my way around now, but I still don't really know how I can contribute to Wikipedia in English. I'm far more active in the ''francophone'' version, mostly due to the large amount of articles needing translation into French. I'd love to translate for the English-speaking Wiki, but there doesn't seem to be much to do - mostly maintenance and correcting badly-translated articles. Can you give me any ideas as to which projects I could work on? A big ''merci,'' a ''gracias'' and a thank you!  +++$+++ :Hello, Daniel! I, too, thank you for the adoption. I promise to work hard to improve Wikipedia. The problem is that I don't really know what I can work on. I joined Wikipedia at the beginning of the year and for many months was too shy and bewildered to really do much. I can more or less find my way around now, but I still don't really know how I can contribute to Wikipedia in English. I'm far more active in the ''francophone'' version, mostly due to the large amount of articles needing translation into French. I'd love to translate for the English-speaking Wiki, but there doesn't seem to be much to do - mostly maintenance and correcting badly-translated articles. Can you give me any ideas as to which projects I could work on? A big ''merci,'' a ''gracias'' and a thank you! [[User:Marialadouce|Marialadouce]] 18:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
614597 +++$+++ Marialadouce +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614595 +++$+++ 614596 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.161597600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the tips. It looks like there's plenty of work for me in the stubs category. Now I'll just have to see how I'll balance the work on the French and English Wikipedias. There'll always be more work to do on the French one, but I don't want either of my accounts to stagnate. I'll be sure to ask you if I ever encounter any problems. Happy editing!  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the tips. It looks like there's plenty of work for me in the stubs category. Now I'll just have to see how I'll balance the work on the French and English Wikipedias. There'll always be more work to do on the French one, but I don't want either of my accounts to stagnate. I'll be sure to ask you if I ever encounter any problems. Happy editing! [[User:Marialadouce|Marialadouce]] 03:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

279702 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.163739300E09 +++$+++ Hi Spartaz. I've [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2006\/Candidate_statements\/Questions_for_Paul_August|answered your Tongue in Cheek Question ;-)]]. Thanks for asking.  +++$+++ Hi Spartaz. I've [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2006/Candidate_statements/Questions_for_Paul_August|answered your Tongue in Cheek Question ;-)]]. Thanks for asking. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
279703 +++$+++ Spartaz +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279702 +++$+++ 279702 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.163739420E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Your response made me smile out loud. :)  +++$+++ :Thank you. Your response made me smile out loud. :) [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] 20:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
279704 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279702 +++$+++ 279703 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.163739660E09 +++$+++ ;-)  +++$+++ :: ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

46617 +++$+++ Hell in a Bucket +++$+++ Uucp +++$+++ 46617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-27 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.251378300E09 +++$+++ Regarding [[John Corcoran (author)]], out of curiosity why wasn't this article sourced with third party references? I found a plethora but find it strange wikipedia would allow to let that stick with out proper sourcing. There wasn't a issue with the info just the lack of sources could make the page appear to be advertising when it is for a rather notable person, especially when the only link is to their own personal business' site. Not jumping you so please don't take it that way. Just wanted to know if it was an oversight or something. +++$+++ Regarding [[John Corcoran (author)]], out of curiosity why wasn't this article sourced with third party references? I found a plethora but find it strange wikipedia would allow to let that stick with out proper sourcing. There wasn't a issue with the info just the lack of sources could make the page appear to be advertising when it is for a rather notable person, especially when the only link is to their own personal business' site. Not jumping you so please don't take it that way. Just wanted to know if it was an oversight or something.[[User:Hell in a Bucket|Hell In A Bucket]] ([[User talk:Hell in a Bucket|talk]]) 06:05, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
46618 +++$+++ Hell in a Bucket +++$+++ Uucp +++$+++ 46617 +++$+++ 46617 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.251380760E09 +++$+++ Just curious not raising an issue, I happened to see him speak almost ten years ago at a school of mine so I was curious and like I said just a tad surprised there hadn't been more on there. Other then adding a few sources and formatting it's still your work so you are the one who did the good job. +++$+++ :Just curious not raising an issue, I happened to see him speak almost ten years ago at a school of mine so I was curious and like I said just a tad surprised there hadn't been more on there. Other then adding a few sources and formatting it's still your work so you are the one who did the good job.[[User:Hell in a Bucket|Hell In A Bucket]] ([[User talk:Hell in a Bucket|talk]]) 06:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

604418 +++$+++ RoySmith +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ 604418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-03 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.133604240E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to express my thanks for the careful and thoughtful work you put into closing this AfD.  -- +++$+++ Just wanted to express my thanks for the careful and thoughtful work you put into closing this AfD.  --[[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] 02:04, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
604419 +++$+++ Peyna +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ 604418 +++$+++ 604418 +++$+++ 2005-12-03 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.133605140E09 +++$+++ Same here; it's reassuring to know that admins do more than just count heads when reviewing AfD.  +++$+++ :Same here; it's reassuring to know that admins do more than just count heads when reviewing AfD. [[User:Peyna|Peyna]] 02:19, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

279705 +++$+++ Arthur_Rubin +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279705 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-20 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164080040E09 +++$+++ You recently blocked {{IPvandal|65.164.168.38}} (about 15 seconds ahead of me).  Should we go back and look at his previous \"contributions\" to see if they've all been caught?  (I don't want to duplicate effort.)  &mdash;  +++$+++ You recently blocked {{IPvandal|65.164.168.38}} (about 15 seconds ahead of me).  Should we go back and look at his previous "contributions" to see if they've all been caught?  (I don't want to duplicate effort.)  &mdash; [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] |  [[User_talk:Arthur_Rubin|(talk)]] 19:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
279706 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279705 +++$+++ 279705 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.164080220E09 +++$+++ There are not that many. I'd be happy to look at them.  +++$+++ :There are not that many. I'd be happy to look at them. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
279707 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279705 +++$+++ 279705 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.164082020E09 +++$+++ OK, I've looked at all of the IP's edits. I've reverted a couple, all the others were reverted by other editors.  +++$+++ :OK, I've looked at all of the IP's edits. I've reverted a couple, all the others were reverted by other editors. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

17562 +++$+++ Flayer +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17562 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-25 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.277497860E09 +++$+++ Hi. I can ask the same question: Why do you insist to make the Israeli Air Force bigger than is? :) While most source tend to report the total number of aircraft that were supplied to Israel, I tend to believe that smaller numbers in most cases are correct, because aircraft go old and sometimes withdrawn from service. When I see different numbers for Cobras, I believe that the smallest number is correct. In the other hand, when I see different numbers for T-6's or AH-64D's, for example, I take the the maximum, because IAF receives them nowadays. Anyway, I provided a reference - IISS, which has the same mistakes like INSS, but also has the latest date.  +++$+++ Hi. I can ask the same question: Why do you insist to make the Israeli Air Force bigger than is? :) While most source tend to report the total number of aircraft that were supplied to Israel, I tend to believe that smaller numbers in most cases are correct, because aircraft go old and sometimes withdrawn from service. When I see different numbers for Cobras, I believe that the smallest number is correct. In the other hand, when I see different numbers for T-6's or AH-64D's, for example, I take the the maximum, because IAF receives them nowadays. Anyway, I provided a reference - IISS, which has the same mistakes like INSS, but also has the latest date. [[User:Flayer|Flayer]] ([[User talk:Flayer|talk]]) 13:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
17563 +++$+++ Flayer +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17562 +++$+++ 17562 +++$+++ 2010-06-25 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.277500800E09 +++$+++ I think my approach is just fine as it is, and I also provide sources to avoid accusations of pushing original research.  +++$+++ : I think my approach is just fine as it is, and I also provide sources to avoid accusations of pushing original research. [[User:Flayer|Flayer]] ([[User talk:Flayer|talk]]) 14:20, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
17564 +++$+++ Flayer +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17562 +++$+++ 17562 +++$+++ 2010-06-25 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.277502180E09 +++$+++ My source is newer.  +++$+++ : My source is newer. [[User:Flayer|Flayer]] ([[User talk:Flayer|talk]]) 14:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
17565 +++$+++ Flayer +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17562 +++$+++ 17564 +++$+++ 2010-06-25 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.277502840E09 +++$+++ I'm working on this now: [[User talk:Flayer\/sandbox]].  +++$+++ :: I'm working on this now: [[User talk:Flayer/sandbox]]. [[User:Flayer|Flayer]] ([[User talk:Flayer|talk]]) 14:54, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
17566 +++$+++ Flayer +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17562 +++$+++ 17565 +++$+++ 2010-06-25 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.277507280E09 +++$+++ Now you can show some effort to fill the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Israeli_Air_Force&oldid=370109128#Current table].  +++$+++ ::: Now you can show some effort to fill the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israeli_Air_Force&oldid=370109128#Current table]. [[User:Flayer|Flayer]] ([[User talk:Flayer|talk]]) 16:08, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

279708 +++$+++ Solipsist3 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-23 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.164274800E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. Just writing to say that the 'dubious edits' on the [[Jason]] article did not seem dubious to this user. Can you please elaborate?  +++$+++ Hi Paul. Just writing to say that the 'dubious edits' on the [[Jason]] article did not seem dubious to this user. Can you please elaborate? [[User:Solipsist3|Solipsist3]] 01:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
279709 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279708 +++$+++ 279708 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.164277320E09 +++$+++ Hi Soliosist3. Well part of my revert was ok. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Jason&diff=89362451&oldid=89360687 This is the dubious edit] I wanted to revert. Thanks for pointing our my mistake.  +++$+++ :Hi Soliosist3. Well part of my revert was ok. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jason&diff=89362451&oldid=89360687 This is the dubious edit] I wanted to revert. Thanks for pointing our my mistake. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

279711 +++$+++ Solipsist3 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279711 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.165416300E09 +++$+++ Further to this case, Solipsist3 has decided after a late night emergency meeting that Paul August's name shall be added to the prestigious and exclusive list of Best Friends that appears on Solipsist3's user page. Solipsist3 hopes that Paul August is appropriately humbled by this honour.  +++$+++ Further to this case, Solipsist3 has decided after a late night emergency meeting that Paul August's name shall be added to the prestigious and exclusive list of Best Friends that appears on Solipsist3's user page. Solipsist3 hopes that Paul August is appropriately humbled by this honour. [[User:Solipsist3|Solipsist3]] 06:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
279712 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279711 +++$+++ 279711 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.166924580E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the typo and this belated reply, I've only just noticed yours above. Indeed ''I am'' most honored to be so designated, it is always nice to be befriended. Regards,  +++$+++ :Sorry for the typo and this belated reply, I've only just noticed yours above. Indeed ''I am'' most honored to be so designated, it is always nice to be befriended. Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

17568 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-21 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.279747500E09 +++$+++ [[File:Israel-vs -Arabs-21092009-by-Barry-Hunau-Jerusalempost.jpg|250px|thumb]]-- +++$+++ [[File:Israel-vs -Arabs-21092009-by-Barry-Hunau-Jerusalempost.jpg|250px|thumb]]--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 14:25, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
17569 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17568 +++$+++ 17568 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.279847640E09 +++$+++ Well, I agree many times it's biased against Israel. But you know what, the problem Israel has is for long not with the Arab people-meaning, we do have conflicts with some Arab nations, but not with all or even most-even if publicly they speak against Israel. The problem Israel has is mainly with radical Islam. Turkey is not an Arab country, nor did Iran. Nevertheless, the first become more and more anti Israeli since Erodgan, who served two years in prison when he was young for his activity in radical Islamic movement, was elected while the last become Israel's enemy only after radical Islam took over the country.-- +++$+++ :Well, I agree many times it's biased against Israel. But you know what, the problem Israel has is for long not with the Arab people-meaning, we do have conflicts with some Arab nations, but not with all or even most-even if publicly they speak against Israel. The problem Israel has is mainly with radical Islam. Turkey is not an Arab country, nor did Iran. Nevertheless, the first become more and more anti Israeli since Erodgan, who served two years in prison when he was young for his activity in radical Islamic movement, was elected while the last become Israel's enemy only after radical Islam took over the country.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 18:14, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
17570 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17568 +++$+++ 17569 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.279856580E09 +++$+++ I agree with you of course. To me this cartoon is a cartoon about UN. Yesterday we had an interesting conversation about this cartoon with Nableezy.I mean it started with cartoon, but then we discussed Palestinian government and so on, and Nableezy wrote: \"Hamas is the democratically elected government of the Palestinian people. They were not elected because the Palestinians want an Islamist state or support \"terrorist attacks\" or any other such reason; they were elected because the Palestinians were largely fed up with the corrupt and inept leadership provided by Fatah.\" I liked this statement, and it is probably the truth. Palestinians like freedoms as all other people do, and \"Islamist state\" cannot provide that freedom.  Palestinians  like to live in peace as all other people do, but Hamas they elected cannot give them that peace. I also understand frustration of people because of corrupt governments. I understand it all, what I cannot understand why now, 4 years later after Hamas was elected, Palestinian people do not overthrow it? But back to Nableezy. I was surprised to find out that he believes that Hamas will lead Gaza to be an \"Islamist state\"  that supports \"terrorist attacks\", and I liked it. Best.-- +++$+++ ::I agree with you of course. To me this cartoon is a cartoon about UN. Yesterday we had an interesting conversation about this cartoon with Nableezy.I mean it started with cartoon, but then we discussed Palestinian government and so on, and Nableezy wrote: "Hamas is the democratically elected government of the Palestinian people. They were not elected because the Palestinians want an Islamist state or support "terrorist attacks" or any other such reason; they were elected because the Palestinians were largely fed up with the corrupt and inept leadership provided by Fatah." I liked this statement, and it is probably the truth. Palestinians like freedoms as all other people do, and "Islamist state" cannot provide that freedom.  Palestinians  like to live in peace as all other people do, but Hamas they elected cannot give them that peace. I also understand frustration of people because of corrupt governments. I understand it all, what I cannot understand why now, 4 years later after Hamas was elected, Palestinian people do not overthrow it? But back to Nableezy. I was surprised to find out that he believes that Hamas will lead Gaza to be an "Islamist state"  that supports "terrorist attacks", and I liked it. Best.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 20:43, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
17571 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17568 +++$+++ 17570 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.279858200E09 +++$+++ I believe people are responsible for the choice they made, though some are being considered as more responsible as the cartoon shows. Nevertheless, I know Israel do its best to avoid causalities among what is considered as \"uninvolved civilians\", meaning people who do not carry weapon but are in dangerous proximity to terrorists from Hamas and other radical Islamic terror organizations who do carry weapon. Sometimes the \"uninvolved civilians\" are people who on purpose get close to those because they know the IDF will not strike them this way. See [http:\/\/www.hosem.org.il\/sW\/%D7%A2%D7%93%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%A7%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%9F-%D7%91%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%98%D7%99-%D7%91%D7%9B%D7%99%D7%A8-%D7%91%D7%96%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%9C-%D7%95%D7%A6%D7%94%D7%9C this link]. But if you ask me, then from the operational perspective, putting such efforts to prevent causalities on the other side, even when international law allow that (international law, regardless how selectively and with how much impartially it's enforced, do allow for instance to strike citizens who willingly serve as a human shield for armed forces of the enemy who shot on you) damage the IDF abilities. Many people compare this situation to a situation when one is get into arena with one of his hands is tied behind his back. I think Israel have to [http:\/\/www.hosem.org.il\/D8\/%D7%94%D7%A0%D7%90%D7%95%D7%9D-%D7%A9%D7%94%D7%95%D7%97%D7%A8%D7%9D---%D7%94%D7%9C%D7%9C-%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%99%D7%99%D7%A8-%D7%9E%D7%A0%D7%9B%D7%9C-UN-Watch ignore the UN] when it's clear it's biased and to make less efforts to avoid its enemy causalities while increasing the efforts to keep its soldiers life. A commander who risk his soldiers life to keep those of its enemy citizens is immoral and non competent. -- +++$+++ :::I believe people are responsible for the choice they made, though some are being considered as more responsible as the cartoon shows. Nevertheless, I know Israel do its best to avoid causalities among what is considered as "uninvolved civilians", meaning people who do not carry weapon but are in dangerous proximity to terrorists from Hamas and other radical Islamic terror organizations who do carry weapon. Sometimes the "uninvolved civilians" are people who on purpose get close to those because they know the IDF will not strike them this way. See [http://www.hosem.org.il/sW/%D7%A2%D7%93%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%A7%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%9F-%D7%91%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%98%D7%99-%D7%91%D7%9B%D7%99%D7%A8-%D7%91%D7%96%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%9C-%D7%95%D7%A6%D7%94%D7%9C this link]. But if you ask me, then from the operational perspective, putting such efforts to prevent causalities on the other side, even when international law allow that (international law, regardless how selectively and with how much impartially it's enforced, do allow for instance to strike citizens who willingly serve as a human shield for armed forces of the enemy who shot on you) damage the IDF abilities. Many people compare this situation to a situation when one is get into arena with one of his hands is tied behind his back. I think Israel have to [http://www.hosem.org.il/D8/%D7%94%D7%A0%D7%90%D7%95%D7%9D-%D7%A9%D7%94%D7%95%D7%97%D7%A8%D7%9D---%D7%94%D7%9C%D7%9C-%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%99%D7%99%D7%A8-%D7%9E%D7%A0%D7%9B%D7%9C-UN-Watch ignore the UN] when it's clear it's biased and to make less efforts to avoid its enemy causalities while increasing the efforts to keep its soldiers life. A commander who risk his soldiers life to keep those of its enemy citizens is immoral and non competent. --[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 21:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
17572 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17568 +++$+++ 17571 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.279858920E09 +++$+++ But you know something Mila, any hypocrisy and every evil have its end. And if you carefully watch the chain reaction of historical events happening in such short time, you will get to the conclusion that the entire world is standing in front of a decisive point. Humanity in general have very weak historical sense, people are under the illusion that the wheel is spinning at the same point while it actually progress.-- +++$+++ ::::But you know something Mila, any hypocrisy and every evil have its end. And if you carefully watch the chain reaction of historical events happening in such short time, you will get to the conclusion that the entire world is standing in front of a decisive point. Humanity in general have very weak historical sense, people are under the illusion that the wheel is spinning at the same point while it actually progress.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 21:22, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
17573 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17568 +++$+++ 17572 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.279861320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for those videos! They are great. When the president rebuked UN watch representative it sadly sounded veri similar to some Wikipedia admnins rebuking some users: \"I cannot care less that what you are saying is the truth, to me it is better you were talking lies, but a nice lies\" :)-- +++$+++ :::::Thanks for those videos! They are great. When the president rebuked UN watch representative it sadly sounded veri similar to some Wikipedia admnins rebuking some users: "I cannot care less that what you are saying is the truth, to me it is better you were talking lies, but a nice lies" :)--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 22:02, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
17574 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17568 +++$+++ 17573 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.279862160E09 +++$+++ I do believe that the true will win, even when all chances do seem against it. -- +++$+++ ::::::I do believe that the true will win, even when all chances do seem against it. --[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 22:16, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

279713 +++$+++ Toresbe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-26 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.164612660E09 +++$+++ Hello, I put that self-link in [[Recursion]] because I thought it was funny - nobody objected on the talk page. Several serious encyclopedias have this in the see also-section - why can't we? :) - basically, it was intentional, nobody seemed to mind, can you please put it back?  +++$+++ Hello, I put that self-link in [[Recursion]] because I thought it was funny - nobody objected on the talk page. Several serious encyclopedias have this in the see also-section - why can't we? :) - basically, it was intentional, nobody seemed to mind, can you please put it back? [[User:Toresbe|toresbe]] 23:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
279714 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279713 +++$+++ 279713 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.164613620E09 +++$+++ Hi Toresbe. Sorry I never saw your comment on the talk page. I'll leave a reply there.  +++$+++ :Hi Toresbe. Sorry I never saw your comment on the talk page. I'll leave a reply there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

445295 +++$+++ Keeper76 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-16 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.213651260E09 +++$+++ was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&curid=5137507&diff=219702526&oldid=219702246 this spelling correction].  Personally, I like the idea of threatening FAC better :-)  [[User:Keeper76|<font color=\"#21421E\" face=\"comic sans ms\">Keeper<\/font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color=\"#CC7722\" face=\"Papyrus\">76<\/font>]]  |   +++$+++ was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&curid=5137507&diff=219702526&oldid=219702246 this spelling correction].  Personally, I like the idea of threatening FAC better :-)  [[User:Keeper76|<font color="#21421E" face="comic sans ms">Keeper</font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">76</font>]]  |  [[User:Keeper76#Origins of My Username|<font color="#ff0000"><small>Disclaimer</small></font>]] 14:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
445296 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445295 +++$+++ 445295 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.213651560E09 +++$+++ I laughed out loud myself when I saw I did that. \"Threat\" is not too far off from what many ANI threads start as anyways...  +++$+++ :I laughed out loud myself when I saw I did that. "Threat" is not too far off from what many ANI threads start as anyways... [[User:Gwynand|Gwynand]] | [[User_talk:Gwynand|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Gwynand|Contribs]] 14:26, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
445297 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445295 +++$+++ 445296 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.213651800E09 +++$+++ That was a good one - worthy of Jay Leno - or at least Reader's Digest. :)  +++$+++ ::That was a good one - worthy of Jay Leno - or at least Reader's Digest. :) [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 14:30, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
445298 +++$+++ Keeper76 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445295 +++$+++ 445297 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.213751700E09 +++$+++ Is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKeeper76&diff=219969329&oldid=219968681 this] the third time you've done that?  Hilarious.  (and by the way, I originally typed \"tird\" instead of third, but caught it before saving. :-) And I agree with you about adoption.  Serious flaws.  Some of the \"programs\" are hysterical.  [[User:Keeper76|<font color=\"#21421E\" face=\"comic sans ms\">Keeper<\/font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color=\"#CC7722\" face=\"Papyrus\">76<\/font>]]  |   +++$+++ :::Is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKeeper76&diff=219969329&oldid=219968681 this] the third time you've done that?  Hilarious.  (and by the way, I originally typed "tird" instead of third, but caught it before saving. :-) And I agree with you about adoption.  Serious flaws.  Some of the "programs" are hysterical.  [[User:Keeper76|<font color="#21421E" face="comic sans ms">Keeper</font>]]  |  [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">76</font>]]  |  [[User:Keeper76#Origins of My Username|<font color="#ff0000"><small>Disclaimer</small></font>]] 18:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
445299 +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ Gwynand +++$+++ 445295 +++$+++ 445298 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.213752000E09 +++$+++ Third that I know of. And it's not like an inside joke, I keep making the same silly mistake. If I forget to change it, then in some cases it will ''totally'' change what I appear to be saying. Yeah... adoption. It seems that its universally decided that adopters themselves needn't have any qualification\/preparation when taking on adoptees. I see highly questionable editors \"adopting\" good-faith newbies, and a sort of vicious cycle starts where no one is doing anything to help the project, just encouraging poor editing. I feel like if I were to ever step in and bring this up, it would only create serious problems... so, I talk about it ''generally'', ''theoretically'', in my safe zone.  +++$+++ ::::Third that I know of. And it's not like an inside joke, I keep making the same silly mistake. If I forget to change it, then in some cases it will ''totally'' change what I appear to be saying. Yeah... adoption. It seems that its universally decided that adopters themselves needn't have any qualification/preparation when taking on adoptees. I see highly questionable editors "adopting" good-faith newbies, and a sort of vicious cycle starts where no one is doing anything to help the project, just encouraging poor editing. I feel like if I were to ever step in and bring this up, it would only create serious problems... so, I talk about it ''generally'', ''theoretically'', in my safe zone. [[User:Gwynand|Gwynand]] | [[User_talk:Gwynand|Talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Gwynand|Contribs]] 18:20, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

46619 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Uucp +++$+++ 46619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-20 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.269085680E09 +++$+++ [[:Template:POTD\/2010-03-20|Today's featured picture]], currently on the main page, contains content that you added in 2005.[https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=The_Water-Babies,_A_Fairy_Tale_for_a_Land_Baby&diff=prev&oldid=18601891]  The text in question lacks inline citations.  At the time, you listed your sole reference as  ''The Encyclopedia of Evolution, 1990, R. Milner, ed.''.  Is it safe to assume that this reference supports the claim that the work was criticized because it depicted \"Americans being chaotic and lazy and Jews being greedy.\"  If so, let me know.  If not, let me know where I can find it so we can add references. Thanks.  +++$+++ [[:Template:POTD/2010-03-20|Today's featured picture]], currently on the main page, contains content that you added in 2005.[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=The_Water-Babies,_A_Fairy_Tale_for_a_Land_Baby&diff=prev&oldid=18601891]  The text in question lacks inline citations.  At the time, you listed your sole reference as  ''The Encyclopedia of Evolution, 1990, R. Milner, ed.''.  Is it safe to assume that this reference supports the claim that the work was criticized because it depicted "Americans being chaotic and lazy and Jews being greedy."  If so, let me know.  If not, let me know where I can find it so we can add references. Thanks. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 04:48, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
46620 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Uucp +++$+++ 46619 +++$+++ 46619 +++$+++ 2010-03-20 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.269146280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the quick response.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the quick response. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 21:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

279716 +++$+++ Toresbe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279716 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-30 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.164884460E09 +++$+++ Just a reminder, I've updated the talk page now. Will you please give your thoughts? Regards,  +++$+++ Just a reminder, I've updated the talk page now. Will you please give your thoughts? Regards, [[User:Toresbe|toresbe]] 03:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
279717 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279716 +++$+++ 279716 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.164888300E09 +++$+++ I've done so.  +++$+++ :I've done so. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

279719 +++$+++ Linas +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-27 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.164672780E09 +++$+++ As you've noticed, I'm on a tear through general topology, which was going well, until I went to revise\/merge\/update [[filter (mathematics)]], when I stumbled on a very simple conceptual issue. Could you look at the talk page, and tell me what I'm doing wrong?   +++$+++ As you've noticed, I'm on a tear through general topology, which was going well, until I went to revise/merge/update [[filter (mathematics)]], when I stumbled on a very simple conceptual issue. Could you look at the talk page, and tell me what I'm doing wrong?  [[User:Linas|linas]] 16:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
279720 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279719 +++$+++ 279719 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.164674640E09 +++$+++ Hi Linas. Well I've read your comment but I agree with Zundark, I don't see the problem. Every superset of any element of a filter is also an element of the filter.  +++$+++ :Hi Linas. Well I've read your comment but I agree with Zundark, I don't see the problem. Every superset of any element of a filter is also an element of the filter. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
279721 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279719 +++$+++ 279719 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.164674880E09 +++$+++ Can you say why it is \"bad\" that: <math>U= (-0.5, 1.5) \\cup (x-\\epsilon, x+\\epsilon)<\/math> is an element of the filter, for any x and epsilon...?  +++$+++ :Can you say why it is "bad" that: <math>U= (-0.5, 1.5) \cup (x-\epsilon, x+\epsilon)</math> is an element of the filter, for any x and epsilon...? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

17577 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-27 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.288169940E09 +++$+++ @Gilisa, Nope, I am not going to appeal my ban. I am enjoying every single moment of it. It is the best thing that happened to me on Wikipedia. Even 24 hours of highly unfair block could not spoil my enjoyment. BTW did you get my email? Please do email me ASAP. Best.-- +++$+++ @Gilisa, Nope, I am not going to appeal my ban. I am enjoying every single moment of it. It is the best thing that happened to me on Wikipedia. Even 24 hours of highly unfair block could not spoil my enjoyment. BTW did you get my email? Please do email me ASAP. Best.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 01:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
17578 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17577 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-10-28 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.288281420E09 +++$+++ Thanks Demiurge1000, but I wrote-as you well quoted, \"to court again\". Meaning to the AE or AN\/I. Next I will use more proper wording, but it wasn't a legal threat nor meant to hear like one. Also, I've no intention to take anything going on Wikipedia to real court in USA, I think such things seldom happens, if ever happened, and on other subjects which barely fall under the freedom of speech  (like articles containing adult or pedophilic content. I do hope, if we already talk about it, that some day what happen on Wikipedia (but not only) will get some attention from  legislators in the USA or that at least enough media sources will criticize whats going on in here.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks Demiurge1000, but I wrote-as you well quoted, "to court again". Meaning to the AE or AN/I. Next I will use more proper wording, but it wasn't a legal threat nor meant to hear like one. Also, I've no intention to take anything going on Wikipedia to real court in USA, I think such things seldom happens, if ever happened, and on other subjects which barely fall under the freedom of speech  (like articles containing adult or pedophilic content. I do hope, if we already talk about it, that some day what happen on Wikipedia (but not only) will get some attention from  legislators in the USA or that at least enough media sources will criticize whats going on in here.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 08:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

279722 +++$+++ Chick Bowen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-28 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.164774540E09 +++$+++ I assume this is what Filiocht had in mind.  I would so love to put this in as a footnote and not even mention it's being fiction (and utter nonsense). . . I ''do'' think it conveys Nabokov's opinion pretty well.  What do you think?   +++$+++ I assume this is what Filiocht had in mind.  I would so love to put this in as a footnote and not even mention it's being fiction (and utter nonsense). . . I ''do'' think it conveys Nabokov's opinion pretty well.  What do you think?  [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 20:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
279723 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279722 +++$+++ 279722 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.164776040E09 +++$+++ Hi Chick. Well the passage that contains the ''Pale Fire'' ref is problematic for various reasons (it wasn't added by Filiocht by the way). It is out of place in a paragraph that begins \"Joyce's influence is also evident in fields ''other than literature''.\", it duplicates the intent of the \"in Nobokov's case \u2026 \" passage  just above, and I don't see where Nabokov \"listed\" it as \"one of the 20th century's greatest prose works\". So I think we should   simply cut that part and merge the rest, with the previous remark above. I'll do that now. As for reflecting Nabokov's opinion of the ''Wake'', I don't see a problem with citing that amusing ''Pale Fire'' quote, but I think there are plenty of other sources as well.  +++$+++ :Hi Chick. Well the passage that contains the ''Pale Fire'' ref is problematic for various reasons (it wasn't added by Filiocht by the way). It is out of place in a paragraph that begins "Joyce's influence is also evident in fields ''other than literature''.", it duplicates the intent of the "in Nobokov's case … " passage  just above, and I don't see where Nabokov "listed" it as "one of the 20th century's greatest prose works". So I think we should   simply cut that part and merge the rest, with the previous remark above. I'll do that now. As for reflecting Nabokov's opinion of the ''Wake'', I don't see a problem with citing that amusing ''Pale Fire'' quote, but I think there are plenty of other sources as well. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
279724 +++$+++ Chick Bowen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279722 +++$+++ 279723 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.164776580E09 +++$+++ Sounds good, and yes, you're right about the redunancy.  There is something in ''Strong Opinions'', I think, but I can't lay my hands on it right now.  But it's not nearly as fun as the ''Pale Fire'' bit.  By the way, I think that James Joyce Ramble image probably should go--I don't think it's really adding anything.   +++$+++ ::Sounds good, and yes, you're right about the redunancy.  There is something in ''Strong Opinions'', I think, but I can't lay my hands on it right now.  But it's not nearly as fun as the ''Pale Fire'' bit.  By the way, I think that James Joyce Ramble image probably should go--I don't think it's really adding anything.  [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 21:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
279725 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279722 +++$+++ 279722 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.164777120E09 +++$+++ Yes I agree about the Ramble.  +++$+++ :Yes I agree about the Ramble. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

17579 +++$+++ Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-01 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.291195020E09 +++$+++ that your (user) name has been dropped on the blp noticeboard here: [[Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons\/Noticeboard#.22If_someone_considers_themselves_atheist_they_are_atheist.22]] (Smiles)-- +++$+++ that your (user) name has been dropped on the blp noticeboard here: [[Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#.22If_someone_considers_themselves_atheist_they_are_atheist.22]] (Smiles)--[[User:Hodgson-Burnett&#39;s Secret Garden|Hodgson-Burnett&#39;s Secret Garden]] ([[User talk:Hodgson-Burnett&#39;s Secret Garden|talk]]) 01:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
17580 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ 17579 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.291216860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know!-- +++$+++ ::Thanks for letting me know!--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] ([[User talk:Gilisa#top|talk]]) 07:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

279726 +++$+++ NinaEliza +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279726 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.164807120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:NinaEliza|NinaEliza]] 05:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
279727 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279726 +++$+++ 279726 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.164808140E09 +++$+++ Hi Nina, thanks for your kind words.  +++$+++ :Hi Nina, thanks for your kind words. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

17583 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.311716400E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 14:40, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
17584 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311787260E09 +++$+++ I am just so much tired from Wikipedia and I don\xb4t want to even \xb4read\xb4 your response. I have my wikibreak. Respect it. -- +++$+++ ::I am just so much tired from Wikipedia and I don´t want to even ´read´ your response. I have my wikibreak. Respect it. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 10:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17585 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311787260E09 +++$+++ In my user space I can do what I wish and you have no right to reproach my personal chat in my user space with Lighthead. Huge difference among your public chat on main article\xb4s talk page, what is in encyclopedic part and fully public. You should be ashamed of your spying on me. You should be ashamed for that. It was vile (not only uncivil) from you. -- +++$+++ ::In my user space I can do what I wish and you have no right to reproach my personal chat in my user space with Lighthead. Huge difference among your public chat on main article´s talk page, what is in encyclopedic part and fully public. You should be ashamed of your spying on me. You should be ashamed for that. It was vile (not only uncivil) from you. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 10:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17586 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.311790680E09 +++$+++ Actually, the use of 'your' userspace is also governed by various Wikipedia guidelines, and it is not acceptable to use it for lengthy 'chatting' that is not related to Wikipedia. See [[WP:UP#NOT]]; the same guidelines apply to subpages. Accessing a user's subpages is not 'spying'. After you posted false warnings on my User page, it was entirely appropriate that I check whether you were doing anything else inappropriate against me.-- +++$+++ :::Actually, the use of 'your' userspace is also governed by various Wikipedia guidelines, and it is not acceptable to use it for lengthy 'chatting' that is not related to Wikipedia. See [[WP:UP#NOT]]; the same guidelines apply to subpages. Accessing a user's subpages is not 'spying'. After you posted false warnings on my User page, it was entirely appropriate that I check whether you were doing anything else inappropriate against me.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 11:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17587 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.311792120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 11:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17588 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311792540E09 +++$+++ ''Everything'' on Wikipedia is public.-- +++$+++ :::::''Everything'' on Wikipedia is public.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 11:49, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17589 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311793680E09 +++$+++ Well, your \xb4innocent\xb4 userboxes could be for someone hardly offensive, uncivil, hatred, lofty and other very bad things. Some reader of your page could deduced from your user page also your quality and attributes. Do you \xb4Really!\xb4'think content of your user page is fully all right? -- +++$+++ ::::::Well, your ´innocent´ userboxes could be for someone hardly offensive, uncivil, hatred, lofty and other very bad things. Some reader of your page could deduced from your user page also your quality and attributes. Do you ´Really!´'think content of your user page is fully all right? --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 12:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17590 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.311794220E09 +++$+++ Other editors have Userboxes on their User page that indicate very different views to me, but such pages are not 'propaganda' or 'preaching'. They simply indicate that other people have different opinions to me.-- +++$+++ :::::::Other editors have Userboxes on their User page that indicate very different views to me, but such pages are not 'propaganda' or 'preaching'. They simply indicate that other people have different opinions to me.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 12:17, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17591 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311795960E09 +++$+++ Once again, I am not talking about violating Wikipedia rules. I rather would like to touch deeply inside about your preaching userboxes, which you consider as absolutely alright and I consider some of that as I described above. Plus exhaustive, e.g. Probably many other editors could feel it similar. Your page is just hatred and pride. Point of problem is in that you criticize me about activities in my personal user space, while yours and others \xb4User Page\xb4 are bombing with propaganda, spreading hatred thoughts and intolerance. But not only userboxes. All your edits are so. Especially in communication with me or other believer editors. You are just used to releasing this attacking point like secular humanists and fanatical atheists do very often. I do not offend on their beliefs, they should not offend me. Although, I am not surprised of it, because I know you and other editors in the project very deep. -- +++$+++ ::::::::Once again, I am not talking about violating Wikipedia rules. I rather would like to touch deeply inside about your preaching userboxes, which you consider as absolutely alright and I consider some of that as I described above. Plus exhaustive, e.g. Probably many other editors could feel it similar. Your page is just hatred and pride. Point of problem is in that you criticize me about activities in my personal user space, while yours and others ´User Page´ are bombing with propaganda, spreading hatred thoughts and intolerance. But not only userboxes. All your edits are so. Especially in communication with me or other believer editors. You are just used to releasing this attacking point like secular humanists and fanatical atheists do very often. I do not offend on their beliefs, they should not offend me. Although, I am not surprised of it, because I know you and other editors in the project very deep. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 12:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17592 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311799740E09 +++$+++ Your claim is ridiculous. As stated before, if you have a problem with any of the Userboxes, you should discuss at the Talk pages for those User boxes. You personal opinions about me are not important.-- +++$+++ :::::::::Your claim is ridiculous. As stated before, if you have a problem with any of the Userboxes, you should discuss at the Talk pages for those User boxes. You personal opinions about me are not important.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 13:49, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17593 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.311803880E09 +++$+++ My User page contains about 150 userboxes, of which ''four'' have any connection to my personal religious beliefs, with no additional editorial&mdash;clearly ''not'' \"more preaching (=in fact, propagandistic and hatred)\" or \"offensive, uncivil, hatred, lofty and other very bad things\" or \"preaching userboxes\" or \"hatred and pride\" or \"bombing with propaganda, spreading hatred thoughts and intolerance\".-- +++$+++ :::::::::My User page contains about 150 userboxes, of which ''four'' have any connection to my personal religious beliefs, with no additional editorial&mdash;clearly ''not'' "more preaching (=in fact, propagandistic and hatred)" or "offensive, uncivil, hatred, lofty and other very bad things" or "preaching userboxes" or "hatred and pride" or "bombing with propaganda, spreading hatred thoughts and intolerance".--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 14:58, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17594 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311801000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::::::::[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 14:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17595 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.311801300E09 +++$+++ \"Your '''claim''' is ridiculous.\" You made a ridiculous claim about Userboxes. If you don't like the Userboxes, discuss them at the relevant Talk pages.-- +++$+++ ::::::::::::"Your '''claim''' is ridiculous." You made a ridiculous claim about Userboxes. If you don't like the Userboxes, discuss them at the relevant Talk pages.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 14:15, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17596 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.311800820E09 +++$+++ The guidelines for User Talk pages state that editors may delete sections from their own Talk pages as they see fit; if you add childish comments beneath an 'award', I am fully entitled to delete the stupid comments, the award, or both. See [[WP:UP#CMT]]. Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I have never said ''you'' are irrelevant (which would be pointless); however, if you make comments that are not relevant or appropriate, I will say so.-- +++$+++ :::::::::::The guidelines for User Talk pages state that editors may delete sections from their own Talk pages as they see fit; if you add childish comments beneath an 'award', I am fully entitled to delete the stupid comments, the award, or both. See [[WP:UP#CMT]]. Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I have never said ''you'' are irrelevant (which would be pointless); however, if you make comments that are not relevant or appropriate, I will say so.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 14:07, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17597 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311801180E09 +++$+++ Again! STOP TALKING! -- +++$+++ ::::::::::::Again! STOP TALKING! --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 14:13, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17598 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.311801300E09 +++$+++ I will respond to anything at my Talk page as I see fit. If you don't want a response, ''do not comment''.-- +++$+++ :::::::::::::I will respond to anything at my Talk page as I see fit. If you don't want a response, ''do not comment''.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 14:15, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

279728 +++$+++ Chick Bowen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-30 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.164877800E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=James_Joyce&diff=91047618&oldid=91023562] (hangs head, and makes appointment with eye doctor).  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Joyce&diff=91047618&oldid=91023562] (hangs head, and makes appointment with eye doctor). [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 01:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
279729 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279728 +++$+++ 279728 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.164878100E09 +++$+++ ;-)  +++$+++ : ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 01:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

614600 +++$+++ Migp +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-24 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.161736140E09 +++$+++ Your comments regarding the two pages make sense and I'm all for them. I do think that the final result should be the ampersand version because that is what the center itself uses; but beyond that, I don't know which version is best to merge into which, and then how to redirect. Again, I understand basic \"how to edit a page and use markups\" pretty well; but more advanced (i.e., meta stuff, for lack of a better term) is still a bit confusing to me. Redirects are one such thing. So I'm 100% open to suggestions on the best way to handle the merge; and in the meantime, I'll happily work on the content piece by piece. (I'm a volunteer there so I have decent knowledge of it.)    +++$+++ Your comments regarding the two pages make sense and I'm all for them. I do think that the final result should be the ampersand version because that is what the center itself uses; but beyond that, I don't know which version is best to merge into which, and then how to redirect. Again, I understand basic "how to edit a page and use markups" pretty well; but more advanced (i.e., meta stuff, for lack of a better term) is still a bit confusing to me. Redirects are one such thing. So I'm 100% open to suggestions on the best way to handle the merge; and in the meantime, I'll happily work on the content piece by piece. (I'm a volunteer there so I have decent knowledge of it.)   [[User:Migp|Migp]] 17:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
614601 +++$+++ Migp +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614600 +++$+++ 614600 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.161822120E09 +++$+++ Got your other message, thanks! I'll work on it. I'll also include notes on the CSSC entries' discussion pages.   +++$+++ :Got your other message, thanks! I'll work on it. I'll also include notes on the CSSC entries' discussion pages.  [[User:Migp|Migp]] 17:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

279730 +++$+++ Cyde +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-05 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.165370100E09 +++$+++ When you get back, you'll find two unanswered questions from me on your ArbCom question and answers page.  Please have a look.  -- +++$+++ When you get back, you'll find two unanswered questions from me on your ArbCom question and answers page.  Please have a look.  --[[User:Cyde|<font color="#ff66ff">'''Cyde Weys'''</font>]] 17:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
279731 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279730 +++$+++ 279730 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.165569360E09 +++$+++ Hi Cyde. I've just now returned from a long trip. I'm exhausted, jet lagged, hungry, need a shower and a drink, have a suitcase full of dirty close, unopened packages, piles of mail, very full email inbox, recorded telephone messages, hungry cats, \u2026 well you get the idea. I will answer your questions as soon as time and circumstances allow. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Cyde. I've just now returned from a long trip. I'm exhausted, jet lagged, hungry, need a shower and a drink, have a suitcase full of dirty close, unopened packages, piles of mail, very full email inbox, recorded telephone messages, hungry cats, … well you get the idea. I will answer your questions as soon as time and circumstances allow. Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 01:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
279732 +++$+++ SebastianHelm +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279730 +++$+++ 279731 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.165649100E09 +++$+++ Re. the perceived discrepancy between Cyde's two questions: Cyde addressed this [[User talk:Cyde#Endorsement versus voting|here]]; I can see how this fits together: Cyde wants to avoid situations like the one we witness here. One way to do so is to ask candidates not to endorse or unnecessarily comment on other candidates. &mdash;  +++$+++ :: Re. the perceived discrepancy between Cyde's two questions: Cyde addressed this [[User talk:Cyde#Endorsement versus voting|here]]; I can see how this fits together: Cyde wants to avoid situations like the one we witness here. One way to do so is to ask candidates not to endorse or unnecessarily comment on other candidates. &mdash; [[User:SebastianHelm|Sebastian]] 23:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

279733 +++$+++ Mailer diablo +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.165448400E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul, just to let you know that you reserve the right not to answer the questions. I recommend that you refer to [[User talk:Cyde#Your question|this]], [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006\/Vote\/Geogre|this]] and [[User_talk:SlimVirgin#arbcom elections question|this]] for some context first. - ''Best regards'',  +++$+++ Hi Paul, just to let you know that you reserve the right not to answer the questions. I recommend that you refer to [[User talk:Cyde#Your question|this]], [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote/Geogre|this]] and [[User_talk:SlimVirgin#arbcom elections question|this]] for some context first. - ''Best regards'', [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 15:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
279734 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279733 +++$+++ 279733 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.165573740E09 +++$+++ Hi Mailer. Oh dear, perhaps I ought to go away again. I see that there are things needing looking into, I just don't have the gumption at the moment (see my response to Cyde above). Thanks, and my ''best regards'' too,  +++$+++ :Hi Mailer. Oh dear, perhaps I ought to go away again. I see that there are things needing looking into, I just don't have the gumption at the moment (see my response to Cyde above). Thanks, and my ''best regards'' too, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
279735 +++$+++ Mailer diablo +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279733 +++$+++ 279734 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.165581660E09 +++$+++ Please take your time, no rush here. :) - ''Cheers'',  +++$+++ :* Please take your time, no rush here. :) - ''Cheers'', [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 04:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

279737 +++$+++ Wetman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.165934820E09 +++$+++ Thank you for restoring the \"foreign language\" links deleted by [[User:68.190.89.38]], who treads the borderline of vandalism. -- +++$+++ Thank you for restoring the "foreign language" links deleted by [[User:68.190.89.38]], who treads the borderline of vandalism. --[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] 06:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
279738 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279737 +++$+++ 279737 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.165935480E09 +++$+++ Well thanks for the thanks, but it is [[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]], who I believe deserves [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Heracles&diff=93549661&oldid=93544688 the credit.] Best regards,  +++$+++ :Well thanks for the thanks, but it is [[User:Hectorian|Hectorian]], who I believe deserves [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heracles&diff=93549661&oldid=93544688 the credit.] Best regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 06:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

279739 +++$+++ Neille i +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.165981740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Neille i|Neille i]] 19:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
279740 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279739 +++$+++ 279739 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.165982160E09 +++$+++ Hi Neille. Sure we can chat, anytime.  +++$+++ :Hi Neille. Sure we can chat, anytime. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
279741 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279739 +++$+++ 279739 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.166043300E09 +++$+++ I see someone has contacted [[User:Giano II]] as well.  Can we have a link to a transcript after it happens, please :) --  +++$+++ :I see someone has contacted [[User:Giano II]] as well.  Can we have a link to a transcript after it happens, please :) -- [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 12:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
279742 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279739 +++$+++ 279741 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.166050800E09 +++$+++ Yes that would be nice.  +++$+++ ::Yes that would be nice. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
279743 +++$+++ Blnguyen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279739 +++$+++ 279739 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.166537100E09 +++$+++ How did it go? ''' +++$+++ :How did it go? '''[[User:Blnguyen|Blnguyen]]'''  ([[User talk:Blnguyen|bananabucket]]) 06:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
279744 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279739 +++$+++ 279743 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.166537880E09 +++$+++ I declined to participate in the show, so I don't know anymore about it.  +++$+++ ::I declined to participate in the show, so I don't know anymore about it. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 06:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

480683 +++$+++ BD2412 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-18 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.300496160E09 +++$+++ Congratulations for topping the disambig hall of fame list for February 2011! Cheers!  +++$+++ Congratulations for topping the disambig hall of fame list for February 2011! Cheers! [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:tan">'''''bd2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 17:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
480684 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ 480683 +++$+++ 480683 +++$+++ 2011-03-20 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.300667880E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I was a little embarrassed about winning my own contest, but it's something I've wanted to do. -- +++$+++ :Thanks. I was a little embarrassed about winning my own contest, but it's something I've wanted to do. --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 17:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

17599 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311730140E09 +++$+++ I thought about our relation many times ago. I found there is something mutually disagreeable between us. Our problems are not about big differences in a worldview, but inside, in personality. Our sort of personality are absolutely incompatible. Every time we have factual talk about topic at the beginning, but finishing in a quarrel. We need [[Mediation|a mediator]] with every issue solving next time. I found BlackCab\xb4s replies on me always more factual, informative, more expected type of information in response, better attitude of cooperation even with those who don\xb4t agree with him, which sometimes includes both of us. But, between you and me, this is not working at all. We always finishing in a quarrel. Next time, when I need to ask someone from WP:JW project to any issue, I\xb4ll rather contact him or other man, because contact between us just does not work. -- +++$+++ I thought about our relation many times ago. I found there is something mutually disagreeable between us. Our problems are not about big differences in a worldview, but inside, in personality. Our sort of personality are absolutely incompatible. Every time we have factual talk about topic at the beginning, but finishing in a quarrel. We need [[Mediation|a mediator]] with every issue solving next time. I found BlackCab´s replies on me always more factual, informative, more expected type of information in response, better attitude of cooperation even with those who don´t agree with him, which sometimes includes both of us. But, between you and me, this is not working at all. We always finishing in a quarrel. Next time, when I need to ask someone from WP:JW project to any issue, I´ll rather contact him or other man, because contact between us just does not work. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 18:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
17600 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17599 +++$+++ 17599 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311744480E09 +++$+++ It is often difficult to interpret your broken English, and that may be a large part of the problem. However, in this instance, you were simply wrong.-- +++$+++ :It is often difficult to interpret your broken English, and that may be a large part of the problem. However, in this instance, you were simply wrong.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 22:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
17601 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17599 +++$+++ 17600 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311787140E09 +++$+++ I am glad you finally \xb4start trying to interpret\xb4 my thoughts. Previously you was disrespect, mocking, haughty, lofty Englishman. Now, you finally \xb4try to\xb4 (and not still lazy as previous) at least. Wow! You did some personality progress since that times. -- +++$+++ ::I am glad you finally ´start trying to interpret´ my thoughts. Previously you was disrespect, mocking, haughty, lofty Englishman. Now, you finally ´try to´ (and not still lazy as previous) at least. Wow! You did some personality progress since that times. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 10:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17602 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17599 +++$+++ 17601 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.311790680E09 +++$+++ I am not an Englishman.-- +++$+++ :::I am not an Englishman.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 11:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17603 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17599 +++$+++ 17602 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.311792120E09 +++$+++ From my POV, you are \xb4Englishman\xb4, because you are native English speaker from Australia. Everyone, who is from USA, Canada, Australia, Great Britain, or from thousands of other places (colonies of British Empire), everyone such is for me \xb4Englishman\xb4. If someone, moreover, has similar nature like you, I call those people as \xb4Lofty Englishmen\". That\xb4s it! -- +++$+++ ::::From my POV, you are ´Englishman´, because you are native English speaker from Australia. Everyone, who is from USA, Canada, Australia, Great Britain, or from thousands of other places (colonies of British Empire), everyone such is for me ´Englishman´. If someone, moreover, has similar nature like you, I call those people as ´Lofty Englishmen". That´s it! --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 11:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17604 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17599 +++$+++ 17603 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311792660E09 +++$+++ Your definition of 'Englishman' is very general, and not technically correct, but you can use the term if you like. 'Lofty' is your irrelevant opinion.-- +++$+++ :::::Your definition of 'Englishman' is very general, and not technically correct, but you can use the term if you like. 'Lofty' is your irrelevant opinion.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 11:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17605 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17599 +++$+++ 17604 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311793680E09 +++$+++ My definition, is, however, for me, much more important, than simple fact, that you are not from England. -- +++$+++ ::::::My definition, is, however, for me, much more important, than simple fact, that you are not from England. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 12:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

279745 +++$+++ CRGreathouse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-13 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.166026440E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you deleted the alternate definitions an anon (156.56.70.58) added to the page. These definitions were incorrect so I'm glad you removed them. I thought it was best to have alternate exists-forall definitions for all of the entries, though, so I added some to the article. This is just a heads-up: the definitions I added aren't the same as the anon's.  +++$+++ I noticed that you deleted the alternate definitions an anon (156.56.70.58) added to the page. These definitions were incorrect so I'm glad you removed them. I thought it was best to have alternate exists-forall definitions for all of the entries, though, so I added some to the article. This is just a heads-up: the definitions I added aren't the same as the anon's. [[User:CRGreathouse|CRGreathouse]]<small> ([[User talk:CRGreathouse|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/CRGreathouse|c]])</small> 08:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
279746 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279745 +++$+++ 279745 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.166057580E09 +++$+++ Hi CRGreathouse. Yes the anon's definitions were clearly incorrect. Your defs left out |''g''(''x'')|, I've fixed them. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi CRGreathouse. Yes the anon's definitions were clearly incorrect. Your defs left out |''g''(''x'')|, I've fixed them. Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
279747 +++$+++ CRGreathouse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279745 +++$+++ 279746 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.166058780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the correction.  As for auto-signing, I'm not sure what you mean.  \"<nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>\" produces \"[[User:CRGreathouse|CRGreathouse]]<small> ([[User talk:CRGreathouse|t]] | [[Special:Contributions\/CRGreathouse|c]])<\/small> 17:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)\" and \"<nowiki>~~~<\/nowiki>\" produces \"[[User:CRGreathouse|CRGreathouse]]<small> ([[User talk:CRGreathouse|t]] | [[Special:Contributions\/CRGreathouse|c]])<\/small>\" for me (and presumably something similar for you, without the t|c), but I imagine you already knew that since you signed your post above.  If you mean customizing it, you can do that by clicking on \"my preferences\" at the top mid-right of your screen.   +++$+++ ::Thanks for the correction.  As for auto-signing, I'm not sure what you mean.  "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" produces "[[User:CRGreathouse|CRGreathouse]]<small> ([[User talk:CRGreathouse|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/CRGreathouse|c]])</small> 17:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)" and "<nowiki>~~~</nowiki>" produces "[[User:CRGreathouse|CRGreathouse]]<small> ([[User talk:CRGreathouse|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/CRGreathouse|c]])</small>" for me (and presumably something similar for you, without the t|c), but I imagine you already knew that since you signed your post above.  If you mean customizing it, you can do that by clicking on "my preferences" at the top mid-right of your screen.  [[User:CRGreathouse|CRGreathouse]]<small> ([[User talk:CRGreathouse|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/CRGreathouse|c]])</small> 17:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
279748 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279745 +++$+++ 279745 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.166059140E09 +++$+++ When I left my comment on your talkpage, I forgot to sign my message. But then It was signed automatically for me. Take a look at your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:CRGreathouse&action=history History page].  +++$+++ :When I left my comment on your talkpage, I forgot to sign my message. But then It was signed automatically for me. Take a look at your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CRGreathouse&action=history History page]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
279749 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279745 +++$+++ 279745 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.166063040E09 +++$+++ Yes, I like it to, but it doesn't seem to always work :(  +++$+++ :Yes, I like it to, but it doesn't seem to always work :( [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
279750 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279745 +++$+++ 279749 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166063280E09 +++$+++ Not sure why the 'bot didn't pick Cyde's edit up, but here -  [[User:HagermanBot]] - is an explanation of what it signs or not.  +++$+++ ::Not sure why the 'bot didn't pick Cyde's edit up, but here -  [[User:HagermanBot]] - is an explanation of what it signs or not. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 18:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

527222 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-05 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.233880500E09 +++$+++ You're not going to believe what I just got in the mail... Five professionally printed photos from the 2nd MAW 2008 Marine Corps Ball. Golly, it took forever, and they are completely useless to me as far as Wikipedia is concerned, as I don't have a scanner. But ''damn'', I look good, marching on as an escort! There is always that. :P ''' +++$+++ You're not going to believe what I just got in the mail... Five professionally printed photos from the 2nd MAW 2008 Marine Corps Ball. Golly, it took forever, and they are completely useless to me as far as Wikipedia is concerned, as I don't have a scanner. But ''damn'', I look good, marching on as an escort! There is always that. :P '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  16:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
527223 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527222 +++$+++ 527222 +++$+++ 2009-02-06 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.233925800E09 +++$+++ Well, the works are in the public domain: federal government employees on duty were the photographers. It woud be nice to scan them in, however. And I don't suppose you have much to worry about me... Al Asad is quite safe, being out in the middle of nowhere. I'm not expecting to leave the base, really... just another staff puke. ''' +++$+++ :Well, the works are in the public domain: federal government employees on duty were the photographers. It woud be nice to scan them in, however. And I don't suppose you have much to worry about me... Al Asad is quite safe, being out in the middle of nowhere. I'm not expecting to leave the base, really... just another staff puke. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  05:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

17606 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17606 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311806940E09 +++$+++ I also wish to delete the link from public article talk page, which you got there after my claim <nowiki><blockquote>In my point of view, I have no religion.<\/blockquote><\/nowiki> This was evidence of your spying on me, and the evidence of your wish to continue in unproductive talk and strengthen your argument with personal attack (which using that private link in fact was). If you really want to know, how is my intended meaning in that, Okay. I just do not consider my faith as religion. (in sense of your secular view probably religion is, and I also often use this word), (but in my PointOfView, I rather call it evidences and relations, as I stated there). I am not sure if you are capable to comprehend my thoughts, so this could some kind of mystery for you. I have no idea, how to explain my attitude in this. \/\/ I want to \xb4strike-out my name\xb4 in original AuthorityTam section too. -- +++$+++ I also wish to delete the link from public article talk page, which you got there after my claim <nowiki><blockquote>In my point of view, I have no religion.</blockquote></nowiki> This was evidence of your spying on me, and the evidence of your wish to continue in unproductive talk and strengthen your argument with personal attack (which using that private link in fact was). If you really want to know, how is my intended meaning in that, Okay. I just do not consider my faith as religion. (in sense of your secular view probably religion is, and I also often use this word), (but in my PointOfView, I rather call it evidences and relations, as I stated there). I am not sure if you are capable to comprehend my thoughts, so this could some kind of mystery for you. I have no idea, how to explain my attitude in this. // I want to ´strike-out my name´ in original AuthorityTam section too. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 15:49, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17607 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17606 +++$+++ 17606 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311830700E09 +++$+++ It isn't up to you to strike out other editors' comments that do not break Wikipedia rules. Whether you 'do not consider your faith as religion' is up to you, but your statement was misleading in the context of editing a religious article. It is not against the rules to have your own views, but it is against the guideline to deny potential bias.-- +++$+++ :It isn't up to you to strike out other editors' comments that do not break Wikipedia rules. Whether you 'do not consider your faith as religion' is up to you, but your statement was misleading in the context of editing a religious article. It is not against the rules to have your own views, but it is against the guideline to deny potential bias.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 22:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17608 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17606 +++$+++ 17607 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311833160E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 23:06, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
17609 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17606 +++$+++ 17608 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311866760E09 +++$+++ The links given were directly relevant to the lies you had told as part of discussion. As I have not edited your comments, there is no comparable action for you to 'revert'. It is not a valid request for you to ask that your changes to others' comments not be reverted. You also appear to have an incorrect understanding of what constitutes 'vandalism'.-- +++$+++ :::The links given were directly relevant to the lies you had told as part of discussion. As I have not edited your comments, there is no comparable action for you to 'revert'. It is not a valid request for you to ask that your changes to others' comments not be reverted. You also appear to have an incorrect understanding of what constitutes 'vandalism'.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 08:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
17610 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17606 +++$+++ 17608 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311867000E09 +++$+++ I did not 'use the link twice'. There were two different links. I linked a diff at article Talk to indicate that you were being misleading regarding your religious affiliation. I linked to your 'Chat' page at User talk after you falsely accused me of 'chatting'.-- +++$+++ :::I did not 'use the link twice'. There were two different links. I linked a diff at article Talk to indicate that you were being misleading regarding your religious affiliation. I linked to your 'Chat' page at User talk after you falsely accused me of 'chatting'.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 08:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
17611 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17606 +++$+++ 17610 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 09:36:00 +++$+++ 1.311870960E09 +++$+++ You just lied again. I did not lied in that discussion. I tried to explain you here yesterday, but it\xb4s probably some kind of mystery for you, because you have very different knowledge than me. I not lied. But you still continuing in your justification for reason why you used private links for strengthen your attacking points in that article talk. It\xb4s funny, if you still think that your procedure was in that talk correct!??? Yeah! You don\xb4t disturb Wikipedia\xb4s rules, (only recommendations like Wiki-Etiquette) but there are other rules, which people have in hearts without written on paper! -- +++$+++ ::::You just lied again. I did not lied in that discussion. I tried to explain you here yesterday, but it´s probably some kind of mystery for you, because you have very different knowledge than me. I not lied. But you still continuing in your justification for reason why you used private links for strengthen your attacking points in that article talk. It´s funny, if you still think that your procedure was in that talk correct!??? Yeah! You don´t disturb Wikipedia´s rules, (only recommendations like Wiki-Etiquette) but there are other rules, which people have in hearts without written on paper! --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 09:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
17612 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17606 +++$+++ 17611 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.311871380E09 +++$+++ I have clearly indicated the context of your misleading statements regarding your religious affiliation.-- +++$+++ :::::I have clearly indicated the context of your misleading statements regarding your religious affiliation.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 09:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
17613 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17606 +++$+++ 17612 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311872400E09 +++$+++ I several time, again and again, explain you, that was NOT misleading. It IS misleading only in your brain. Respect it. -- +++$+++ ::::::I several time, again and again, explain you, that was NOT misleading. It IS misleading only in your brain. Respect it. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 10:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
17614 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17606 +++$+++ 17613 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311873180E09 +++$+++ No, it ''is'' misleading. Your actual words were, \"In my point of view, I have no religion\". Any impartial person reading that would interpret it to mean that 'you '''have no religion'''{{'}}. It is really very clear. The 'special' definition of the words you used only means something to you. I provided a link to indicate that what you implied was in fact false.-- +++$+++ :::::::No, it ''is'' misleading. Your actual words were, "In my point of view, I have no religion". Any impartial person reading that would interpret it to mean that 'you '''have no religion'''{{'}}. It is really very clear. The 'special' definition of the words you used only means something to you. I provided a link to indicate that what you implied was in fact false.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 10:13, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

279751 +++$+++ Cyde +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-13 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.166065860E09 +++$+++ Hrmm, it looks like the bot hasn't been running for over an hour now.  Maybe it malfunctioned, or its owner shut it off?  -- +++$+++ Hrmm, it looks like the bot hasn't been running for over an hour now.  Maybe it malfunctioned, or its owner shut it off?  --[[User:Cyde|<font color="#ff66ff">'''Cyde Weys'''</font>]] 19:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
279752 +++$+++ NoSeptember +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279751 +++$+++ 279751 +++$+++ 2006-12-15 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.166185980E09 +++$+++ HagermanBot does not sign any comments that have links to User or User talk space, and your unsigned comment above had just such a link.  +++$+++ :HagermanBot does not sign any comments that have links to User or User talk space, and your unsigned comment above had just such a link. [[User:NoSeptember/Signature12|<font color = "green">'''NoSeptember'''</font>]] 04:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

279754 +++$+++ Elaragirl +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-13 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.166065740E09 +++$+++ --<font face=\"Verdana\">[[User:Elaragirl|<font color=\"SteelBlue\">Elar<\/font>]][[User:Elaragirl\/a|<font color=\"orange\">'''a'''<\/font>]][[User:Elaragirl\/Signatures|<font color=\"SteelBlue\">girl<\/font>]]<small><sup>[[User_Talk:Elaragirl|Talk]]| +++$+++ --<font face="Verdana">[[User:Elaragirl|<font color="SteelBlue">Elar</font>]][[User:Elaragirl/a|<font color="orange">'''a'''</font>]][[User:Elaragirl/Signatures|<font color="SteelBlue">girl</font>]]<small><sup>[[User_Talk:Elaragirl|Talk]]|[[User:Elaragirl/EditCount|Count]]</sup></small></font> 19:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
279755 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279754 +++$+++ 279754 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.166074980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

490686 +++$+++ Jimbo Wales +++$+++ Cynical +++$+++ 490686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-20 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.140494280E09 +++$+++ Will you reconsider?-- +++$+++ Will you reconsider?--[[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] 19:58, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
490687 +++$+++ Cynical +++$+++ Cynical +++$+++ 490686 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-20 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.140496080E09 +++$+++ In short, I did not sign the manifesto because I have any great ideological attachment to userboxes, but because of the worrying disregard for Wikipedia process. I would be willing to reconsider if the broad sentiment behind the manifesto (preventing arbitrary insertion of policy without discussion, and abuse of power by admins) could be achieved in the current structure  +++$+++ ::In short, I did not sign the manifesto because I have any great ideological attachment to userboxes, but because of the worrying disregard for Wikipedia process. I would be willing to reconsider if the broad sentiment behind the manifesto (preventing arbitrary insertion of policy without discussion, and abuse of power by admins) could be achieved in the current structure [[User:Cynical|Cynical]] 20:28, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
490688 +++$+++ Mareino +++$+++ Cynical +++$+++ 490686 +++$+++ 490686 +++$+++ 2006-02-20 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.140496980E09 +++$+++ I agree with Cynical. I never objected to any Wiki policy, or felt that I was being treated unfairly, until CSD T1 was handed down. There are many policies that I disagree with (such as allowing IP edits to take effect immediately), but I feel like my opinion would be heard if I wanted to engage in a debate about it. The march against userboxes is against the consensual spirit of Wikipedia -- it's admins enforcing their beliefs about which userboxes are \"bad\" and which are \"good\" on the rest of us.--[[User:Mareino|M]][[User_talk:Mareino|<font color=\"orange\">@<\/font>]][[User:Mareino|r]][[Special:Contributions\/Mareino|<font color=\"orange\">\u0113<\/font>]] +++$+++ *I agree with Cynical. I never objected to any Wiki policy, or felt that I was being treated unfairly, until CSD T1 was handed down. There are many policies that I disagree with (such as allowing IP edits to take effect immediately), but I feel like my opinion would be heard if I wanted to engage in a debate about it. The march against userboxes is against the consensual spirit of Wikipedia -- it's admins enforcing their beliefs about which userboxes are "bad" and which are "good" on the rest of us.--[[User:Mareino|M]][[User_talk:Mareino|<font color="orange">@</font>]][[User:Mareino|r]][[Special:Contributions/Mareino|<font color="orange">ē</font>]][[User:Mareino|ino]] 20:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
490689 +++$+++ Alai +++$+++ Cynical +++$+++ 490686 +++$+++ 490686 +++$+++ 2006-02-21 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.140518400E09 +++$+++ The essential difficulty here is that it's not always clear when you're making decrees or not, and that several editors are in this case acting as if they've received such, regardless of your intent. (e.g., [[Wikipedia_talk:Proposed_policy_on_userboxes#The_policy_is_now_in_action]]) Discussion on the pedobox case revealed signficant confusion on this, with some parties inferring that a) they can be subject to sanctions if they act against the \"ultimate authority\" (as per [[meta:Foundation_issues]]) of the project leader, and b) that it was prudent to assume you were always acting in that capacity, unless stated otherwise. I think it would be extremely helpful if you were to make clear when you were expressing a personal opinion or acting as an ordinary editor on the one hand, or acting in your capacity as CEO and representative of the MW board on the other. Perhaps most usefully of all, what the presumption ought to be when it's not explicit either way.  +++$+++ *The essential difficulty here is that it's not always clear when you're making decrees or not, and that several editors are in this case acting as if they've received such, regardless of your intent. (e.g., [[Wikipedia_talk:Proposed_policy_on_userboxes#The_policy_is_now_in_action]]) Discussion on the pedobox case revealed signficant confusion on this, with some parties inferring that a) they can be subject to sanctions if they act against the "ultimate authority" (as per [[meta:Foundation_issues]]) of the project leader, and b) that it was prudent to assume you were always acting in that capacity, unless stated otherwise. I think it would be extremely helpful if you were to make clear when you were expressing a personal opinion or acting as an ordinary editor on the one hand, or acting in your capacity as CEO and representative of the MW board on the other. Perhaps most usefully of all, what the presumption ought to be when it's not explicit either way. [[User:Alai|Alai]] 02:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

279756 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-19 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.166536800E09 +++$+++ I appreciate you fixing the use of rf\/ent in [[infinity]] but I was sorta hoping to use that as a test bed. It's the only article I've found that has spaces in the template calls *and* more than one note. Glad someone is handling this.  +++$+++ I appreciate you fixing the use of rf/ent in [[infinity]] but I was sorta hoping to use that as a test bed. It's the only article I've found that has spaces in the template calls *and* more than one note. Glad someone is handling this. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 06:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
279757 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.166536980E09 +++$+++ Well it is easy enough to create a test page.  +++$+++ ::Well it is easy enough to create a test page. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 06:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
279758 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-19 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.166538060E09 +++$+++ True, and I have done that. But it would be better in the long run to handle the leading spaces in the template. I think I have the solution for that.  +++$+++ ::: True, and I have done that. But it would be better in the long run to handle the leading spaces in the template. I think I have the solution for that. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 06:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

17615 +++$+++ Danjel +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17615 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.311873000E09 +++$+++ Jeffro, with all due respect, I suggest that you stop responding. -''<font face=\"Tahoma\"> +++$+++ Jeffro, with all due respect, I suggest that you stop responding. -''<font face="Tahoma">[[User:Danjel|danjel]]</font>'' ([[User_talk:Danjel|talk to me]]) 10:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
17616 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17615 +++$+++ 17615 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311873180E09 +++$+++ Noted, but I'm still putting in my reply here over the edit conflict. Also, if I am falsely accused, I reserve the right to reply. However, I take your point.-- +++$+++ :Noted, but I'm still putting in my reply here over the edit conflict. Also, if I am falsely accused, I reserve the right to reply. However, I take your point.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 10:13, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
17617 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17615 +++$+++ 17615 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311875520E09 +++$+++ I suggest you - Danjel and others not interfere with our discussion. We still talking normally and solving one issue. Your and others talking on me, what I take as inappropriate interfering with our private. -- +++$+++ :I suggest you - Danjel and others not interfere with our discussion. We still talking normally and solving one issue. Your and others talking on me, what I take as inappropriate interfering with our private. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 10:52, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
17618 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17615 +++$+++ 17617 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311876000E09 +++$+++ As an involved party in the dispute, I welcome and accept Danjel's input.-- +++$+++ ::As an involved party in the dispute, I welcome and accept Danjel's input.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 11:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

396152 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ 396152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.312142820E09 +++$+++ With Nixon set for FAC tonight US time, there is a remaining matter.  People keep changing the last sentence of the first paragraph from \"Nixon is the only President to resign the office.\" to \"Nixon is the only President to have resigned the office.\"  I think the first sentence is more effective, and is grammatically sound, but you are the expert.  Also, I would appreciate it if you would look over what I have done with the images in the Presidential section (basically added a large image at the start of each major section, as you did with Domestic Policy, as the way of giving the reader a break from the unending text.-- +++$+++ With Nixon set for FAC tonight US time, there is a remaining matter.  People keep changing the last sentence of the first paragraph from "Nixon is the only President to resign the office." to "Nixon is the only President to have resigned the office."  I think the first sentence is more effective, and is grammatically sound, but you are the expert.  Also, I would appreciate it if you would look over what I have done with the images in the Presidential section (basically added a large image at the start of each major section, as you did with Domestic Policy, as the way of giving the reader a break from the unending text.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 13:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
396153 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ 396152 +++$+++ 396152 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.312153140E09 +++$+++ I like your shorter version better, but is it standard AmEng to exclude the \"from\" after \"resigned\". If so, fine.  +++$+++ :I like your shorter version better, but is it standard AmEng to exclude the "from" after "resigned". If so, fine. [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 15:59, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
396154 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ 396152 +++$+++ 396153 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312153860E09 +++$+++ Either sounds fine to me.  I suspect it will be batted around at FAC quite a bit.  Thanks.-- +++$+++ ::Either sounds fine to me.  I suspect it will be batted around at FAC quite a bit.  Thanks.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 16:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
396155 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ 396152 +++$+++ 396154 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.312153920E09 +++$+++ (e.c.) Love those big pics; at half-screen on my 27\", the Zhou Enlai one is a bit cluttered with the shake hands and sworn in pics below and above. Same with a few other centred pics in their proximity to the small right-side adjacent pics. At full window width, not such a problem. Impossible to please all widths, though. It's a lot of fiddle. Looking for ways of separating them: reverse order of \"Civil rights\" and \"US space program\"? (BTW, is the transcripts pic centred?) The alternative might be to put two or more parallel between paragraphs. Don't worry. Gotta go to bed!  +++$+++ :::(e.c.) Love those big pics; at half-screen on my 27", the Zhou Enlai one is a bit cluttered with the shake hands and sworn in pics below and above. Same with a few other centred pics in their proximity to the small right-side adjacent pics. At full window width, not such a problem. Impossible to please all widths, though. It's a lot of fiddle. Looking for ways of separating them: reverse order of "Civil rights" and "US space program"? (BTW, is the transcripts pic centred?) The alternative might be to put two or more parallel between paragraphs. Don't worry. Gotta go to bed! [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 16:12, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

279763 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-26 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.167132840E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! ;-)  +++$+++ Congratulations! ;-) [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 03:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
279764 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279763 +++$+++ 279763 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.167133800E09 +++$+++ Is it congratulations or condolences? In any case thank you.  +++$+++ :Is it congratulations or condolences? In any case thank you. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
279765 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279763 +++$+++ 279764 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.167161700E09 +++$+++ Congratulations. I'm very glad you were chosen for the ArbCom, in what has been perhaps the best election yet. You'll make a great arbitrator. Cheers, - +++$+++ ::Congratulations. I'm very glad you were chosen for the ArbCom, in what has been perhaps the best election yet. You'll make a great arbitrator. Cheers, -[[User:Will Beback|Will Beback]] · [[User talk:Will Beback|†]] · 11:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
279766 +++$+++ KillerChihuahua +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279763 +++$+++ 279763 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.167195300E09 +++$+++ Thanks and best wishes for taking on this demanding role.  +++$+++ *Thanks and best wishes for taking on this demanding role. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup> 20:55, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
279767 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279763 +++$+++ 279765 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.167196920E09 +++$+++ Condolescences, obviously ;-))))) Apart from jokes, I'm really happy you did it, your exactly the type of editors that are needed for the job. Oh, and happy new year! :-))))-- +++$+++ :::Condolescences, obviously ;-))))) Apart from jokes, I'm really happy you did it, your exactly the type of editors that are needed for the job. Oh, and happy new year! :-))))--[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 21:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
279768 +++$+++ Jossi +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279763 +++$+++ 279763 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.167196500E09 +++$+++ Congratulations, and hope you enjoy this new role (despite sometime being a thankless job.)  +++$+++ * Congratulations, and hope you enjoy this new role (despite sometime being a thankless job.) [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 21:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

17620 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-30 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312019160E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | As I can see [[Special:Contributions\/Jeffro77|here]], you still continue with \xb4citations\xb4, \xb4editing\xb4, \xb4maintenance\xb4 and so much other important actions in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Jehovah's_Witnesses|WP:JW]]. And that\xb4s good. But, continue in that, what you already doing. It is also important to cite precisely and fully, especially Bible verses. JW literature is hence like extras and the Bible is the cornerstone. Do not \xb4pluck things out of context\xb4 and be sincere. And because of these all I give (forever, no removal in future) you today from my heart the \"Citation Barnstar\". Happy and active editing!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | As I can see [[Special:Contributions/Jeffro77|here]], you still continue with ´citations´, ´editing´, ´maintenance´ and so much other important actions in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Jehovah's_Witnesses|WP:JW]]. And that´s good. But, continue in that, what you already doing. It is also important to cite precisely and fully, especially Bible verses. JW literature is hence like extras and the Bible is the cornerstone. Do not ´pluck things out of context´ and be sincere. And because of these all I give (forever, no removal in future) you today from my heart the "Citation Barnstar". Happy and active editing! [[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 02:46, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17621 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17620 +++$+++ 17620 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.312019580E09 +++$+++ I realise that JWs consider all their beliefs to be based on the Bible. However, the Bible is also very subject to interpretation, as seen by the number of Christian religions in the world. That is why JW beliefs are referenced to JW literature other than the Bible in Wikipedia articles, to provide the JW interpretation.-- +++$+++ :I realise that JWs consider all their beliefs to be based on the Bible. However, the Bible is also very subject to interpretation, as seen by the number of Christian religions in the world. That is why JW beliefs are referenced to JW literature other than the Bible in Wikipedia articles, to provide the JW interpretation.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 02:53, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17622 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17620 +++$+++ 17621 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.312020360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for comment. But it\xb4s not part of award. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for comment. But it´s not part of award. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 03:06, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17623 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17620 +++$+++ 17622 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.312027740E09 +++$+++ The comment suggesting that my sincerity is limited due to a lack of Bible-based belief is not really appropriate. I therefore will probably not keep the barnstar. But I appreciate the gesture.-- +++$+++ :::The comment suggesting that my sincerity is limited due to a lack of Bible-based belief is not really appropriate. I therefore will probably not keep the barnstar. But I appreciate the gesture.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 05:09, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17624 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17620 +++$+++ 17623 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.312061580E09 +++$+++ Well, if you feel so, you haven\xb4t to keep this barnstar. In one sentence I wrote only! \xb4you currently haven\xb4t belief\xb4. In pre-last sentence I encourage you to be sincere and depth in all your doing. But, you could trust me, there was not any hidden sense. If you dislike with the text, I encourage you change it to sense you like. I even allow you to do it. Only do not change the whole text of my wishes to you. But if you would like to change it, maybe deleting one sentence is enough. Or similarly. I don\xb4t know how you feel it, and what preciously is dislike to you. Just change it. -- +++$+++ ::::Well, if you feel so, you haven´t to keep this barnstar. In one sentence I wrote only! ´you currently haven´t belief´. In pre-last sentence I encourage you to be sincere and depth in all your doing. But, you could trust me, there was not any hidden sense. If you dislike with the text, I encourage you change it to sense you like. I even allow you to do it. Only do not change the whole text of my wishes to you. But if you would like to change it, maybe deleting one sentence is enough. Or similarly. I don´t know how you feel it, and what preciously is dislike to you. Just change it. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 14:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17625 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17620 +++$+++ 17624 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312062060E09 +++$+++ If you don't mind me re-wording it, I might do that; I'll think about it anyway. By the way, I've noticed a few times that you've used the word \"preciously\" (=drahocenn\u011b) where you seem to mean \"precisely\" (=p\u0159esn\u011b). (I got the Czech words from Google Translate.)-- +++$+++ :::::If you don't mind me re-wording it, I might do that; I'll think about it anyway. By the way, I've noticed a few times that you've used the word "preciously" (=drahocenně) where you seem to mean "precisely" (=přesně). (I got the Czech words from Google Translate.)--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 14:41, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17626 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17620 +++$+++ 17625 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312062300E09 +++$+++ Ouch! Sure. It should be \"precisely\" (=p\u0159esn\u011b). \/\/ Don\xb4t worry. Just change it the barnstar. \/\/ -- +++$+++ ::::::Ouch! Sure. It should be "precisely" (=přesně). // Don´t worry. Just change it the barnstar. // --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 14:45, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17627 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17620 +++$+++ 17626 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.312062900E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Looking up the Czech words reminded me of when I visited Prague in 2007. Good memories. But the only words from then I remember are \"dobry den\" and \"(Karlov) Most\".-- +++$+++ :::::::Thanks. Looking up the Czech words reminded me of when I visited Prague in 2007. Good memories. But the only words from then I remember are "dobry den" and "(Karlov) Most".--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 14:55, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17628 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17620 +++$+++ 17627 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.312064940E09 +++$+++ That is quite good for one-time tourist. -- +++$+++ ::::::::That is quite good for one-time tourist. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 15:29, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

614606 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614606 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-26 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.161912480E09 +++$+++ And lastly, the original title is \"Beauty And The Beast\" yet the USA DVD title is \"Blood Of Beasts\".  Which one should I use for the title of the article? - +++$+++ And lastly, the original title is "Beauty And The Beast" yet the USA DVD title is "Blood Of Beasts".  Which one should I use for the title of the article? -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 18:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
614607 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614606 +++$+++ 614606 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.162041840E09 +++$+++ Would I need to cite plot summary itself, or would the movie bascially be the source?  (Sorry if that's a dumb question; I can get overly thorough at times.) ^_^; And thanks again. :) - +++$+++ :Would I need to cite plot summary itself, or would the movie bascially be the source?  (Sorry if that's a dumb question; I can get overly thorough at times.) ^_^; And thanks again. :) -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 06:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

515600 +++$+++ Antilived +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-18 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.253278560E09 +++$+++ Hey is there any way of closing the page move request without closing the discussion also? --[[User: Antilived|antilived]]<sup>[[User_talk:Antilived|T]] | [[Special:Contributions\/Antilived|C]] |  +++$+++ Hey is there any way of closing the page move request without closing the discussion also? --[[User: Antilived|antilived]]<sup>[[User_talk:Antilived|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Antilived|C]] | [[User:Antilived/Gallery|G]]</sup> 05:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
515601 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515600 +++$+++ 515600 +++$+++ 2009-09-18 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.253278980E09 +++$+++ Sure. Let me see what I can do. - +++$+++ :Sure. Let me see what I can do. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 06:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
515602 +++$+++ Antilived +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515600 +++$+++ 515601 +++$+++ 2009-09-18 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.253280060E09 +++$+++ Yep that looks good. Thank you. --[[User: Antilived|antilived]]<sup>[[User_talk:Antilived|T]] | [[Special:Contributions\/Antilived|C]] |  +++$+++ ::Yep that looks good. Thank you. --[[User: Antilived|antilived]]<sup>[[User_talk:Antilived|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Antilived|C]] | [[User:Antilived/Gallery|G]]</sup> 06:21, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

279769 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-26 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.167204780E09 +++$+++ Thanks to you all. Will, I hope I live up to your expectations. KC, I will definitely hope for some of those good wishes to come true. Yes Aldux, condolences indeed, but I will try my best, and Buon anno to you too ;-) Jossi, I don't think \"enjoy\" is the word I'd use, but as in gifts, it's the thought that counts ;-) To all, thanks for your kind words, I hope I am, and continue to be, deserving of them. Any advice, counsel or criticism will be very welcome. If you think I've made a mistake, I want to know. If think I've done a good job, thanks will be much appreciated. I can use all the help I can get. Thanks again, and Buon anno a tutti :)  +++$+++ Thanks to you all. Will, I hope I live up to your expectations. KC, I will definitely hope for some of those good wishes to come true. Yes Aldux, condolences indeed, but I will try my best, and Buon anno to you too ;-) Jossi, I don't think "enjoy" is the word I'd use, but as in gifts, it's the thought that counts ;-) To all, thanks for your kind words, I hope I am, and continue to be, deserving of them. Any advice, counsel or criticism will be very welcome. If you think I've made a mistake, I want to know. If think I've done a good job, thanks will be much appreciated. I can use all the help I can get. Thanks again, and Buon anno a tutti :) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:33, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
279770 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279769 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.167205440E09 +++$+++ Congratulations, Paul! Best of luck with ArbCom! =) ''' +++$+++ ::Congratulations, Paul! Best of luck with ArbCom! =) '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 23:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

279771 +++$+++ Guillom +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279771 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-26 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.167156120E09 +++$+++ Hello. Congratulations for your election. You now have oversight access on the English-language Wikipedia. Please read [[Wikipedia:Oversight]] before using this feature. Cheers!  +++$+++ Hello. Congratulations for your election. You now have oversight access on the English-language Wikipedia. Please read [[Wikipedia:Oversight]] before using this feature. Cheers! [[User:Guillom|guillom]] 10:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
279772 +++$+++ Redux +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279771 +++$+++ 279771 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.167167580E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul.  In addition, please subscribe to [http:\/\/mail.wikipedia.org\/mailman\/listinfo\/oversight-l Oversight-l].  And congratulations on your new status.   +++$+++ :Hi Paul.  In addition, please subscribe to [http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/oversight-l Oversight-l].  And congratulations on your new status.  [[User:Redux|Redux]] 13:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

17629 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-30 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.312064280E09 +++$+++ So enjoy it! (as i said, - it was in page you watched) -- +++$+++ So enjoy it! (as i said, - it was in page you watched) --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 15:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17630 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.312065780E09 +++$+++ I try to work according to the rules on Wikipedia, and that resulted in some problems between us, but I think we would get along okay in other circumstances.-- +++$+++ :I try to work according to the rules on Wikipedia, and that resulted in some problems between us, but I think we would get along okay in other circumstances.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 15:43, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17631 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17630 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.312067640E09 +++$+++ Yeah. You should. It\xb4s late night in your town now. -- +++$+++ ::Yeah. You should. It´s late night in your town now. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 16:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17632 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17631 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312069260E09 +++$+++ After you\xb4ll wake up and take your breakfast, and say \"dobr\xe9 r\xe1no\" their close ones, I\xb4d like to know, how you can saying about JW\xb4s with such hatred tone, with such contempt, .... and few moments after, ... you just offer me \"almost friendship and hope for future cooperation\". How can you be such big hypocrite, man? Tell me, what I should think about [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Jehovah%27s_Witnesses&diff=prev&oldid=442205855 this]. There is no doubt about I did rightly, when I leaved from the project. There is no hope for our productive cooperation in future, if you persistently insults mine, and others, values. You did it before. You still continue with it again. I suggest not only striking-out, but fully delete those two sentences. I am so sad from this your act. Bye. -- +++$+++ :::After you´ll wake up and take your breakfast, and say "dobré ráno" their close ones, I´d like to know, how you can saying about JW´s with such hatred tone, with such contempt, .... and few moments after, ... you just offer me "almost friendship and hope for future cooperation". How can you be such big hypocrite, man? Tell me, what I should think about [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jehovah%27s_Witnesses&diff=prev&oldid=442205855 this]. There is no doubt about I did rightly, when I leaved from the project. There is no hope for our productive cooperation in future, if you persistently insults mine, and others, values. You did it before. You still continue with it again. I suggest not only striking-out, but fully delete those two sentences. I am so sad from this your act. Bye. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 16:41, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17633 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17632 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.312097880E09 +++$+++ I wish you well.-- +++$+++ ::::I wish you well.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 00:38, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
17634 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17632 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312103460E09 +++$+++ Also, the other element of my comments, that \"they believe that various accounts of murder and genocide in the Bible ... by their god are justified\" is not a specific 'attack' on JWs, but applies equally to ''any'' religious group that believes the ancient Jewish tribes were justified in killing off the neighbouring people.-- +++$+++ ::::Also, the other element of my comments, that "they believe that various accounts of murder and genocide in the Bible ... by their god are justified" is not a specific 'attack' on JWs, but applies equally to ''any'' religious group that believes the ancient Jewish tribes were justified in killing off the neighbouring people.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 02:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
17635 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17634 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.312116900E09 +++$+++ --- +++$+++ :::::---[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 05:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
17636 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17635 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.312117380E09 +++$+++ I am not being sarcastic when I say I wish you well.-- +++$+++ ::::::I am not being sarcastic when I say I wish you well.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 06:03, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
17637 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17636 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312117860E09 +++$+++ But when you saying sth. bad about my brothers, you also saying against me. If you contempt with the Bible, I contempt with you. \/\/ I stated that \"I thought (in the past) Armageddon is cruel before! I met Jehovah\xb4s depth and kindness, before I met His acting with mankind, before I met His nature\". Today NO! \/\/ If you saying \"I wish you well\", you are not sarcastic, but you are hypocrite, because sentence in article talk clearly reveal you contempt with my values, and with me. For me, there is no difference if you say \"You are irrelevant\" or \"Your claim is irrelevant\". For me is no difference. -- +++$+++ :::::::But when you saying sth. bad about my brothers, you also saying against me. If you contempt with the Bible, I contempt with you. // I stated that "I thought (in the past) Armageddon is cruel before! I met Jehovah´s depth and kindness, before I met His acting with mankind, before I met His nature". Today NO! // If you saying "I wish you well", you are not sarcastic, but you are hypocrite, because sentence in article talk clearly reveal you contempt with my values, and with me. For me, there is no difference if you say "You are irrelevant" or "Your claim is irrelevant". For me is no difference. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 06:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
17638 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17637 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312119360E09 +++$+++ I still wish you well, even though you don't.-- +++$+++ ::::::::I still wish you well, even though you don't.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 06:36, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
17639 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17638 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312120560E09 +++$+++ Not because you don\xb4t like my beliefs, but because I am such as my all neurons together are. All my qualities are based on that. I can be full as whole, or I can be empty as whole. All that matters inside each man are only thoughts, motives, memories, knowledge, emotions etc. You can\xb4t be divided on more than 1 piece. You are as your values are. Nothing less. Nothing more. Could be someone JW in his\/her heart and in the same time be hypocrite with deliberately breaking Jehovah\xb4s laws? No! In that time such person is just NOT JW. Not because elders exclude him after some time. Jehovah do not consider such person as a friend even much time before that. People could found reasons for exclude. But always long after. Jehovah reject such person much time before people even found any problems. No-one just can be someone other, than he\/she actually is. -- +++$+++ :::::::::Not because you don´t like my beliefs, but because I am such as my all neurons together are. All my qualities are based on that. I can be full as whole, or I can be empty as whole. All that matters inside each man are only thoughts, motives, memories, knowledge, emotions etc. You can´t be divided on more than 1 piece. You are as your values are. Nothing less. Nothing more. Could be someone JW in his/her heart and in the same time be hypocrite with deliberately breaking Jehovah´s laws? No! In that time such person is just NOT JW. Not because elders exclude him after some time. Jehovah do not consider such person as a friend even much time before that. People could found reasons for exclude. But always long after. Jehovah reject such person much time before people even found any problems. No-one just can be someone other, than he/she actually is. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 06:56, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
17640 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17639 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.312121100E09 +++$+++ Are you exactly the same as you were 10, 20, or 30 years ago? No. Each person's own values and opinions change over time. And everyone has some things about themselves they would like to change. So why should you be offended that someone disagrees with your beliefs, when the beliefs and opinions you have now (even those things that have nothing to do with religion) are different to what you used to think? Do you hate yourself for changing? If not, why have contempt for others just because they don't share your beliefs or opinions?-- +++$+++ ::::::::::Are you exactly the same as you were 10, 20, or 30 years ago? No. Each person's own values and opinions change over time. And everyone has some things about themselves they would like to change. So why should you be offended that someone disagrees with your beliefs, when the beliefs and opinions you have now (even those things that have nothing to do with religion) are different to what you used to think? Do you hate yourself for changing? If not, why have contempt for others just because they don't share your beliefs or opinions?--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 07:05, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
17641 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17640 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.312122540E09 +++$+++ Yeah. It is changing over time. But, it doesn\xb4t matter on that. You, in fact, suggest me that I should try be a hypocrite and mock communion with people with them I have no to share. Should I be hypocrite and mock \xb4I other than I am\xb4? I am sincere (not only because my sign on wiki). If someone say \xb4I want to be your friend\xb4, I will very deeply examine such person\xb4s motives, I will be careful many months and years, if is it \xb4the real\xb4. I have no interest to have another friends, who are not friends. Those who I have is enough. I am used to be suspicious about people, who say that, because experience, in fact empiric is clear. I have not in plan to change my values to worse way. But, if other one would like to change their own, they actually could do it. \/\/ I\xb4m sorry, but this discussion have to end. I have other \xb4time plans\xb4 for now. -- +++$+++ :::::::::::Yeah. It is changing over time. But, it doesn´t matter on that. You, in fact, suggest me that I should try be a hypocrite and mock communion with people with them I have no to share. Should I be hypocrite and mock ´I other than I am´? I am sincere (not only because my sign on wiki). If someone say ´I want to be your friend´, I will very deeply examine such person´s motives, I will be careful many months and years, if is it ´the real´. I have no interest to have another friends, who are not friends. Those who I have is enough. I am used to be suspicious about people, who say that, because experience, in fact empiric is clear. I have not in plan to change my values to worse way. But, if other one would like to change their own, they actually could do it. // I´m sorry, but this discussion have to end. I have other ´time plans´ for now. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 07:29, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
17642 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17641 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312122720E09 +++$+++ 2 Corinthians 6:13. That is all. I still wish you well.-- +++$+++ ::::::::::::2 Corinthians 6:13. That is all. I still wish you well.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 07:32, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
17643 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17641 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.312125780E09 +++$+++ I am not suggesting that you should be friends with ''everyone'', or that you should be ''my'' friend. What I am saying is that you are only making things harder for yourself by getting upset and taking things personally when other people disagree with your beliefs.-- +++$+++ ::::::::::::I am not suggesting that you should be friends with ''everyone'', or that you should be ''my'' friend. What I am saying is that you are only making things harder for yourself by getting upset and taking things personally when other people disagree with your beliefs.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 08:23, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
17644 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17641 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.312126200E09 +++$+++ In fact, the things you have objected to most in the last few days have actually been the presentation of ''JW beliefs'' you have either not properly understood (e.g. Abaddon = Jesus) or are not comfortable with (e.g. God approved of genocide in the Bible). You should not criticize other people for discussing such things on Wikipedia. Also, Wikipedia editors are allowed to ''have'' a point of view. What is not permitted is for that POV to improperly influence articles. That is why editors are requested to supply sources, and that is what I have done in each instance where you have become upset.-- +++$+++ ::::::::::::In fact, the things you have objected to most in the last few days have actually been the presentation of ''JW beliefs'' you have either not properly understood (e.g. Abaddon = Jesus) or are not comfortable with (e.g. God approved of genocide in the Bible). You should not criticize other people for discussing such things on Wikipedia. Also, Wikipedia editors are allowed to ''have'' a point of view. What is not permitted is for that POV to improperly influence articles. That is why editors are requested to supply sources, and that is what I have done in each instance where you have become upset.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 08:30, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
17645 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17629 +++$+++ 17644 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312143600E09 +++$+++ Okay. Well, I like widen out too. But qualification is with \u226a 1 Corinthians 6:14 \u2192 1 Corinthians 2:14 \u2192 John 3:36 \u226b That is all. I still wish you well. -- +++$+++ :::::::::::::Okay. Well, I like widen out too. But qualification is with ≪ 1 Corinthians 6:14 → 1 Corinthians 2:14 → John 3:36 ≫ That is all. I still wish you well. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 13:20, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

279775 +++$+++ Guettarda +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279775 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-27 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.167274320E09 +++$+++ Congrats!   +++$+++ Congrats!  [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] 18:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
279776 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279775 +++$+++ 279775 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.167355680E09 +++$+++ Congratulations!  +++$+++ : Congratulations! [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 17:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

541920 +++$+++ Aatomic1 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-30 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.188518760E09 +++$+++ Hiya Dreamafter could I ask you to make sure that these guys are included in the mediation [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal\/Cases\/2007-08-24 Birmingham pub bombings#Discussion |a]]. Thank you  +++$+++ Hiya Dreamafter could I ask you to make sure that these guys are included in the mediation [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-08-24 Birmingham pub bombings#Discussion |a]]. Thank you [[User:Aatomic1|Aatomic1]] 17:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
541921 +++$+++ Aatomic1 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541920 +++$+++ 541920 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.188933060E09 +++$+++ I also wish to include ''Does not breach WP:NOT#MEMORIAL'' as part of my summary  +++$+++ *I also wish to include ''Does not breach WP:NOT#MEMORIAL'' as part of my summary [[User:Aatomic1|Aatomic1]] 12:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
541922 +++$+++ GiollaUidir +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541920 +++$+++ 541920 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.188951240E09 +++$+++ Agree with your summary of my position on the matter. +++$+++ *Agree with your summary of my position on the matter.[[User:GiollaUidir|GiollaUidir]] 17:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
541923 +++$+++ Brixton Busters +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541920 +++$+++ 541922 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.188952920E09 +++$+++ I have amended my summary to a more accurate one.  +++$+++ :*I have amended my summary to a more accurate one. [[User:Brixton Busters|Brixton Busters]] 17:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

279777 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-28 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.167356280E09 +++$+++ Thanks Oleg. I hope I can count on you and others for some help from time to time, I will need it. +++$+++ Thanks Oleg. I hope I can count on you and others for some help from time to time, I will need it.[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
279778 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279777 +++$+++ 279777 +++$+++ 2006-12-30 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.167485160E09 +++$+++ What kind of help?  +++$+++ : What kind of help? [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 05:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
279779 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279777 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-30 08:57:00 +++$+++ 1.167497820E09 +++$+++ As for advice, forget it. The last time I offered you advice, it was a suggestion for rewriting the last line of your candidate statement. Like most people offered advice, you ignored it; and now look at the mess you\u2019re in! ;-) -- +++$+++ ::: As for advice, forget it. The last time I offered you advice, it was a suggestion for rewriting the last line of your candidate statement. Like most people offered advice, you ignored it; and now look at the mess you’re in! ;-) --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 08:57, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
279780 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279777 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-30 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.167530400E09 +++$+++ Wow thanks K, you'll never know how much I needed a good laugh just now! I especially enjoyed the third. And yes I'm certainly in a mess. As for your advice, as a purely tactical matter your advice was shown to be correct. And it wasn't ignored, it was simply not followed, there's a difference ;-)  +++$+++ ::::Wow thanks K, you'll never know how much I needed a good laugh just now! I especially enjoyed the third. And yes I'm certainly in a mess. As for your advice, as a purely tactical matter your advice was shown to be correct. And it wasn't ignored, it was simply not followed, there's a difference ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:00, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
279781 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279777 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-30 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.167541980E09 +++$+++ Glad it helped. Been there. Just ask. -- +++$+++ ::::: Glad it helped. Been there. Just ask. --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 21:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

548464 +++$+++ Smsarmad +++$+++ MBK004 +++$+++ 548464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-28 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.204243320E09 +++$+++ Hello! If you don't mind can I have your [[User:MBK004\/navigation|User space Navigation Bar]] with some customization? -- +++$+++ Hello! If you don't mind can I have your [[User:MBK004/navigation|User space Navigation Bar]] with some customization? --[[User:Smsarmad|<span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span><span style="background:white;color:DodgerBlue">'''M'''</span><span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span>]]  <sup>[[User talk:Smsarmad|Talk]]</sup> 16:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
548465 +++$+++ Smsarmad +++$+++ MBK004 +++$+++ 548464 +++$+++ 548464 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.204256220E09 +++$+++ So should i edit it in my [[User:Smsarmad\/Sandbox|sandbox]] and then show you for approval? -- +++$+++ :So should i edit it in my [[User:Smsarmad/Sandbox|sandbox]] and then show you for approval? --[[User:Smsarmad|<span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span><span style="background:white;color:DodgerBlue">'''M'''</span><span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span>]]  <sup>[[User talk:Smsarmad|Talk]]</sup> 19:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
548466 +++$+++ Smsarmad +++$+++ MBK004 +++$+++ 548464 +++$+++ 548465 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.204256640E09 +++$+++ Sure! thanks a lot! -- +++$+++ ::Sure! thanks a lot! --[[User:Smsarmad|<span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span><span style="background:white;color:DodgerBlue">'''M'''</span><span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span>]]  <sup>[[User talk:Smsarmad|Talk]]</sup> 19:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

541924 +++$+++ Aatomic1 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-30 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.188517500E09 +++$+++ The names listed [[Talk:Birmingham pub bombings#The Dead | here]] are referenced to this article [http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/tol\/news\/uk\/article392466.ece] while it is still online. They can be cross referenced using the [[Conflict Archive on the Internet| CAIN]] database at [http:\/\/cain.ulst.ac.uk\/sutton\/search.html]. In addition the first 19 names can be referenced from ''Victims of bomb attacks named'' [[The Times]], Nov 23 1974; pg 3; col A; and ''Duke sees Birmingham victims''; '''The Times''', Nov 26 1974; pg 1; col B. Also the names are recorded on the memorial in the grounds of [[St Philip's Cathedral, Birmingham]].  +++$+++ The names listed [[Talk:Birmingham pub bombings#The Dead | here]] are referenced to this article [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article392466.ece] while it is still online. They can be cross referenced using the [[Conflict Archive on the Internet| CAIN]] database at [http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/sutton/search.html]. In addition the first 19 names can be referenced from ''Victims of bomb attacks named'' [[The Times]], Nov 23 1974; pg 3; col A; and ''Duke sees Birmingham victims''; '''The Times''', Nov 26 1974; pg 1; col B. Also the names are recorded on the memorial in the grounds of [[St Philip's Cathedral, Birmingham]]. [[User:Aatomic1|Aatomic1]] 16:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
541925 +++$+++ Aatomic1 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541924 +++$+++ 541924 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.188518400E09 +++$+++ At the time all local and national newspapers carried the story; these can be accessed from Library Archives.  +++$+++ :At the time all local and national newspapers carried the story; these can be accessed from Library Archives. [[User:Aatomic1|Aatomic1]] 17:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

279783 +++$+++ Sailko +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279783 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.168115040E09 +++$+++ Yes I have reasons to doubt that. I am preparing an University exam about Dante's Inferno and making quite deep studies on that. On the books I have (''La Divina Commedia'' by Bosco-Reggio, Le Monnier 1988, and ''Inferno di Dante'' by Vittorio Sermonti, Rizzoli 2001 and these two books list an extensive bibliography each) that is not mentioned. Moreover it says that some critics tried to combine names of Black hguelphs families to the names of the devils. The only correspondence was ''Rubicante'' to Cante Gabrielli da Gubbio, the podest\xe0 of Florence who signed the exhile act for Dante. I can go on and on... I just wrote a pege on italian wikipedia [[:it:I Malebranche]] where all those names where analized, they are quite funny. Some times they are similar to some family names (Malebrance, Raffacani, Rubaconte) but these are florentine families, not just from Lucca, and this can apply only to some devils, other are taken fro popular devil-characters (Alichino from French Hallequin, Farfarello from a kind on follet), others are invented by Dante. If you wish you can copy this in the discussion page of the list. Sometimes also books gets wrong, but comparing as many as possible we can try to get a more valid idea. Thank you-- +++$+++ Yes I have reasons to doubt that. I am preparing an University exam about Dante's Inferno and making quite deep studies on that. On the books I have (''La Divina Commedia'' by Bosco-Reggio, Le Monnier 1988, and ''Inferno di Dante'' by Vittorio Sermonti, Rizzoli 2001 and these two books list an extensive bibliography each) that is not mentioned. Moreover it says that some critics tried to combine names of Black hguelphs families to the names of the devils. The only correspondence was ''Rubicante'' to Cante Gabrielli da Gubbio, the podestà of Florence who signed the exhile act for Dante. I can go on and on... I just wrote a pege on italian wikipedia [[:it:I Malebranche]] where all those names where analized, they are quite funny. Some times they are similar to some family names (Malebrance, Raffacani, Rubaconte) but these are florentine families, not just from Lucca, and this can apply only to some devils, other are taken fro popular devil-characters (Alichino from French Hallequin, Farfarello from a kind on follet), others are invented by Dante. If you wish you can copy this in the discussion page of the list. Sometimes also books gets wrong, but comparing as many as possible we can try to get a more valid idea. Thank you--[[User:Sailko|Sailko]] 12:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
279784 +++$+++ Sailko +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279783 +++$+++ 279783 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.168116300E09 +++$+++ Can you change back? I would really cancel the reference to Lucca in that paragraph. -- +++$+++ :Can you change back? I would really cancel the reference to Lucca in that paragraph. --[[User:Sailko|Sailko]] 12:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
279785 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279783 +++$+++ 279784 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.168141320E09 +++$+++ Ok I agree with you about removing the reference to Lucca there. I've made another edit to that entry to clarify the entry a bit more. Thanks for taking an interest in this unfinished list. It is more or less complete through ''Inf.'', XXIX, perhaps you might like to work with me on finishing it?  +++$+++ ::Ok I agree with you about removing the reference to Lucca there. I've made another edit to that entry to clarify the entry a bit more. Thanks for taking an interest in this unfinished list. It is more or less complete through ''Inf.'', XXIX, perhaps you might like to work with me on finishing it? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
279786 +++$+++ Sailko +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279783 +++$+++ 279785 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.168160820E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I have to study only Inferno, I am checking item to item, I found very complete so far. I will try to add something -- +++$+++ :::Thanks. I have to study only Inferno, I am checking item to item, I found very complete so far. I will try to add something --[[User:Sailko|Sailko]] 01:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

527228 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-28 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.235874660E09 +++$+++ I took a look at [[Help:Sorting]], and made a few changes... but I can't understand how to get dates to work right. I might try again tommorrow, some sleep may help recharge the brain cells; but I think we are fairly limited in how we can sort the columns. ''' +++$+++ I took a look at [[Help:Sorting]], and made a few changes... but I can't understand how to get dates to work right. I might try again tommorrow, some sleep may help recharge the brain cells; but I think we are fairly limited in how we can sort the columns. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  18:31, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
527229 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527228 +++$+++ 527228 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.235935500E09 +++$+++ Swing and a miss... that help page just confused me more, and I couldn't get it to work. Maybe the function works different at Meta? Sorry. I would recommend going to the [[WP:Help desk]]. ''' +++$+++ :Swing and a miss... that help page just confused me more, and I couldn't get it to work. Maybe the function works different at Meta? Sorry. I would recommend going to the [[WP:Help desk]]. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  11:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
527230 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527228 +++$+++ 527229 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.235950320E09 +++$+++ Looks pretty good; I couldn't find any problem. Now go fix [[Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps]] and [[Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps]]. :-D ''' +++$+++ ::Looks pretty good; I couldn't find any problem. Now go fix [[Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps]] and [[Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps]]. :-D '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  15:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
527231 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527228 +++$+++ 527230 +++$+++ 2009-03-02 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.236003180E09 +++$+++ I noticed that on the CMC page... putting a zero in front of the single digits will work... 08, 09, etc. instead of 8, 9. ''' +++$+++ :::I noticed that on the CMC page... putting a zero in front of the single digits will work... 08, 09, etc. instead of 8, 9. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  06:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
527232 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527228 +++$+++ 527231 +++$+++ 2009-03-02 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.236033120E09 +++$+++ Well, I simplified it... [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Commandant_of_the_Marine_Corps&action=edit&section=2 take a look]. I used <code><nowiki><span style=\"display:none\">05<\/span><\/nowiki><\/code>... as you can see, I skipped the \"O\" entirely. If you are referring to cases where the individual held more than one rank, then yes, adding an additional digit would help sort that. We humans usually read an integer from the base (decimal point) and left, but the software reads it from the first digit right. This means that the number of digits is irrelevant, but the precedence of the first digist to conflict are. For example, 09 and 090 are considered the same number as far as sorting is considered, but 092 is ahead of 0934560... I think. The best solution here is probably the decimals you tried elsewhere. But in reality, I really doubt it's worth this much skull sweat! How much functionality will this give a reader anyway? We have the basic mechanics in place, and it works well. Unless, of course, you are merely trying to expand your skill set; in which case I really don't have any more advice for you. Once we start getting into computational mathematics, I lose interest because I don't have room in my head for it. ''' +++$+++ ::::Well, I simplified it... [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commandant_of_the_Marine_Corps&action=edit&section=2 take a look]. I used <code><nowiki><span style="display:none">05</span></nowiki></code>... as you can see, I skipped the "O" entirely. If you are referring to cases where the individual held more than one rank, then yes, adding an additional digit would help sort that. We humans usually read an integer from the base (decimal point) and left, but the software reads it from the first digit right. This means that the number of digits is irrelevant, but the precedence of the first digist to conflict are. For example, 09 and 090 are considered the same number as far as sorting is considered, but 092 is ahead of 0934560... I think. The best solution here is probably the decimals you tried elsewhere. But in reality, I really doubt it's worth this much skull sweat! How much functionality will this give a reader anyway? We have the basic mechanics in place, and it works well. Unless, of course, you are merely trying to expand your skill set; in which case I really don't have any more advice for you. Once we start getting into computational mathematics, I lose interest because I don't have room in my head for it. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  14:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

279787 +++$+++ Grandad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.168145100E09 +++$+++ Was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion\/Wikipedia:Personal_attack_intervention_noticeboard&diff=98933357&oldid=98933222 this] because you changed your mind, or because you realized that the discussion had closed? If the latter, you might be interested to know that it's open again.  +++$+++ Was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Personal_attack_intervention_noticeboard&diff=98933357&oldid=98933222 this] because you changed your mind, or because you realized that the discussion had closed? If the latter, you might be interested to know that it's open again. [[User:Grandad|Grandad]] 20:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
279788 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279787 +++$+++ 279787 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.168151040E09 +++$+++ The latter. Thanks for the heads up.  +++$+++ :The latter. Thanks for the heads up. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

279790 +++$+++ Mcginnly +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.168510140E09 +++$+++ I notice Fred bauder pulled the plug on the Motions in prior cases relating to Giano [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=prev&oldid=99325380]. What's the current situation - is the intention to bring a RFAR against him, bring a RFAR regarding IRC, quietly drop it all and hope it goes away or is there deadlock behind closed doors? I'm very concerned about all this. The discussions I've seen from the logs are quite reprehensible and the justifications implausible, is Giano to suffer another RFAR for some righteous indignation whilst others can act with impunity because of a technicality that their actions were conducted \"off-wiki\". I don't imagine you can give any kind of detailed response but it would be nice to know what's going on rather than Fred just deleting the motion without comment. Many thanks. -- +++$+++ I notice Fred bauder pulled the plug on the Motions in prior cases relating to Giano [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=prev&oldid=99325380]. What's the current situation - is the intention to bring a RFAR against him, bring a RFAR regarding IRC, quietly drop it all and hope it goes away or is there deadlock behind closed doors? I'm very concerned about all this. The discussions I've seen from the logs are quite reprehensible and the justifications implausible, is Giano to suffer another RFAR for some righteous indignation whilst others can act with impunity because of a technicality that their actions were conducted "off-wiki". I don't imagine you can give any kind of detailed response but it would be nice to know what's going on rather than Fred just deleting the motion without comment. Many thanks. --[[User:Mcginnly|Mcginnly]] | [[User talk:Mcginnly|Natter]] 02:09, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
279791 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279790 +++$+++ 279790 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.168517700E09 +++$+++ I think it was fairly clear that there wasn't enough support for those motions to pass, that is why I suspect that Fred removed them. There has been much discussion on all the issues you mention, but we haven't reached any conclusions yet. Frankly I've been quite disturbed by what I've seen in those logs. I will pass along your concerns.  +++$+++ :I think it was fairly clear that there wasn't enough support for those motions to pass, that is why I suspect that Fred removed them. There has been much discussion on all the issues you mention, but we haven't reached any conclusions yet. Frankly I've been quite disturbed by what I've seen in those logs. I will pass along your concerns. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
279792 +++$+++ Mcginnly +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279790 +++$+++ 279791 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.168537860E09 +++$+++ Thanks Paul. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks Paul. --[[User:Mcginnly|Mcginnly]] | [[User talk:Mcginnly|Natter]] 09:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

17647 +++$+++  +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ 2011 (UTC)
17648 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17647 +++$+++ 17647 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312350360E09 +++$+++ The 'unambiguous' statement given in the ''Insight'' book is not supported by the facts. The start and end points are wrong and conflict with the relevant scriptures. The Jews returned in 538BCE, not 537. The 70 years run from 609 (when Babylon destroyed Assyria's secondary capital, Harran, and became the new world power) to 539 (when Babylon was captured by the Medo-Persians and its king was 'called to account').-- +++$+++ :The 'unambiguous' statement given in the ''Insight'' book is not supported by the facts. The start and end points are wrong and conflict with the relevant scriptures. The Jews returned in 538BCE, not 537. The 70 years run from 609 (when Babylon destroyed Assyria's secondary capital, Harran, and became the new world power) to 539 (when Babylon was captured by the Medo-Persians and its king was 'called to account').--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 22:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
17649 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17647 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.312368480E09 +++$+++ The statement \"is not supported by the facts\". By which facts? Of course, secular! Which could are mistaken and wholly wrong, because all people have limited knowledge and could do mistakes. Are pagan! historians excluded? Not! You simply giving yourself a reason, why do not believe. It is too simple. [http:\/\/www.watchtower.org\/e\/bible\/1co\/chapter_002.htm?bk=1co;chp=002;vs=14;citation#bk14 But foolish from your viewpoint. (verse 14 versus 15)] -- +++$+++ :::The statement "is not supported by the facts". By which facts? Of course, secular! Which could are mistaken and wholly wrong, because all people have limited knowledge and could do mistakes. Are pagan! historians excluded? Not! You simply giving yourself a reason, why do not believe. It is too simple. [http://www.watchtower.org/e/bible/1co/chapter_002.htm?bk=1co;chp=002;vs=14;citation#bk14 But foolish from your viewpoint. (verse 14 versus 15)] --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 03:48, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
17650 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17647 +++$+++ 17648 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312383240E09 +++$+++ FaktneviM, you complained a lot when a third person entered your conversations, yet you are doing the same here, ''after'' you 'vanished'. However, apart from that, if you are claiming that I am wrong, why not give some supporting evidence to back up your claim.-- +++$+++ ::FaktneviM, you complained a lot when a third person entered your conversations, yet you are doing the same here, ''after'' you 'vanished'. However, apart from that, if you are claiming that I am wrong, why not give some supporting evidence to back up your claim.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 07:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
17651 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17647 +++$+++ 17650 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312395000E09 +++$+++ Because your \xb4sources\xb4 are irrelevant without examining all in other way than you did so far. -- +++$+++ :::Because your ´sources´ are irrelevant without examining all in other way than you did so far. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 11:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

570920 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-14 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.158241020E09 +++$+++ ''' +++$+++ '''[[User:culverin|Culverin]]''' '''[[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 06:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
570921 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570920 +++$+++ 570920 +++$+++ 2006-09-14 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.158242520E09 +++$+++ This, I very much doubt. Who else would it be? This vandal obviosly shares the same falure to grasp basic spelling and grammar, like yourself. Your reference to \"it\" indicates you know something - and the way it is spaced mimmicks exactly your style. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ : This, I very much doubt. Who else would it be? This vandal obviosly shares the same falure to grasp basic spelling and grammar, like yourself. Your reference to "it" indicates you know something - and the way it is spaced mimmicks exactly your style. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 07:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

279794 +++$+++ Hazelorb +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.168774200E09 +++$+++ Can I ask why this was reverted? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Pi&diff=100148909&oldid=100140159] I am trying to muddle through the edit history now that [[Pi]] has been semi protected. The reference to pi is sourced on the wikipage the editor gave.  +++$+++ Can I ask why this was reverted? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pi&diff=100148909&oldid=100140159] I am trying to muddle through the edit history now that [[Pi]] has been semi protected. The reference to pi is sourced on the wikipage the editor gave. [[User:Hazelorb|Hazelorb]] 03:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
279795 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279794 +++$+++ 279794 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 05:50:00 +++$+++ 1.168955400E09 +++$+++ Sorry I didn't look closely enough at that edit, I thought it was vandalism.  +++$+++ :Sorry I didn't look closely enough at that edit, I thought it was vandalism. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
279796 +++$+++ Hazelorb +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279794 +++$+++ 279795 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.169042340E09 +++$+++ Yea, I figured, when I looked at the edit history (you were reverting the one before that). :)  +++$+++ ::Yea, I figured, when I looked at the edit history (you were reverting the one before that). :) [[User:Hazelorb|Hazelorb]] 05:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

17653 +++$+++ Lighthead +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312343400E09 +++$+++ Final note (''for now'', as I'm obviously getting sucked into this, not through anyone's fault but my own); that blurb that you mentioned in Isaiah's Prophecy Vol. 1. You should, without a doubt, reread that. There is no contradiction there. ''By the end'', important, by the end of the 70 years the verses state that Tyre would have fallen to enemy forces. Do you say that there is a contradiction in the ''Isaiah's Prophecy'', or Isaiah 23:15b-17? Like I said, I've racked my brain and I see no contradiction there. I did when you mentioned it at first. But trust me, there is none. I kind of think that your viewpoint is so subjective that you're seeing things that are not there. Don't you think that that would be a glaring mistake for the Organization?  +++$+++ Final note (''for now'', as I'm obviously getting sucked into this, not through anyone's fault but my own); that blurb that you mentioned in Isaiah's Prophecy Vol. 1. You should, without a doubt, reread that. There is no contradiction there. ''By the end'', important, by the end of the 70 years the verses state that Tyre would have fallen to enemy forces. Do you say that there is a contradiction in the ''Isaiah's Prophecy'', or Isaiah 23:15b-17? Like I said, I've racked my brain and I see no contradiction there. I did when you mentioned it at first. But trust me, there is none. I kind of think that your viewpoint is so subjective that you're seeing things that are not there. Don't you think that that would be a glaring mistake for the Organization? [[User:Lighthead|<b><font color="#CCCC00">'''Lighthead'''</font></b>]] [[User talk:Lighthead|<sup>þ</sup>]] 20:50, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
17654 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17653 +++$+++ 17653 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312349520E09 +++$+++ If you would like to continue this conversation, you may e-mail me. The 'e-mail function' I refer to is available under the 'Toolbox' options on the left of the page when you are at an editor's User or Talk page.-- +++$+++ :If you would like to continue this conversation, you may e-mail me. The 'e-mail function' I refer to is available under the 'Toolbox' options on the left of the page when you are at an editor's User or Talk page.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 22:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
17655 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17653 +++$+++ 17654 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.312368480E09 +++$+++ Question is just one. Why do still searching for faults in places, where are not? -- +++$+++ ::Question is just one. Why do still searching for faults in places, where are not? --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 03:48, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

279799 +++$+++ Giano II +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279799 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.169608380E09 +++$+++ In spite of my best attempts to continue a normal life on wiki, thanks to Mr Sidaway, the whole debate has restarted here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Jurisdiction_over_.23wikipedia-en-admins], Bishonen has just made a very profound and to the point edit, which I think you should read, I of course have made several :-).  However, I am wondering how much longer the arbcom intends for this deplorable mess to continue, before it chooses to act.  Of course I could ignore, but on-wiki silence is taken as agreement, and I don't agree, so I will continue to challenge this situation until it is resolved.  +++$+++ In spite of my best attempts to continue a normal life on wiki, thanks to Mr Sidaway, the whole debate has restarted here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Jurisdiction_over_.23wikipedia-en-admins], Bishonen has just made a very profound and to the point edit, which I think you should read, I of course have made several :-).  However, I am wondering how much longer the arbcom intends for this deplorable mess to continue, before it chooses to act.  Of course I could ignore, but on-wiki silence is taken as agreement, and I don't agree, so I will continue to challenge this situation until it is resolved. [[User:Giano II|Giano]] 19:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
279800 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279799 +++$+++ 279799 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.169611140E09 +++$+++ Hi Giano. I've just read Bishonen's comment. I find it reasonable and to the point. Thanks for pointing it out. (''putting on my somewhat battered ArbCom hat'') The ArbCom most definitly does not want \"this deplorable mess to continue\". (''hat falls off'') But It is not clear to me whether the ArbCom has, or should have, any jurisdiction over the Wikipedia IRC channels, and I don't know when or if the ArbCom will act in any further way on this. But it does seem clear to me that as long as these IRC channells continue to bear Wikipedia's name, then Wikipedia should have Jurisdiction over them. This may be a matter though that the community will have to deal with itself. As for silence being interpreted as agreement, I think everyone knows where you stand.  +++$+++ :Hi Giano. I've just read Bishonen's comment. I find it reasonable and to the point. Thanks for pointing it out. (''putting on my somewhat battered ArbCom hat'') The ArbCom most definitly does not want "this deplorable mess to continue". (''hat falls off'') But It is not clear to me whether the ArbCom has, or should have, any jurisdiction over the Wikipedia IRC channels, and I don't know when or if the ArbCom will act in any further way on this. But it does seem clear to me that as long as these IRC channells continue to bear Wikipedia's name, then Wikipedia should have Jurisdiction over them. This may be a matter though that the community will have to deal with itself. As for silence being interpreted as agreement, I think everyone knows where you stand. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

17656 +++$+++ Lighthead +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312351860E09 +++$+++ {{you've got mail}} I think. Where do I see your e-mail; and how do I even see mine. Never ever used this function before.  +++$+++ {{you've got mail}} I think. Where do I see your e-mail; and how do I even see mine. Never ever used this function before. [[User:Lighthead|<b><font color="#CCCC00">'''Lighthead'''</font></b>]] [[User talk:Lighthead|<sup>þ</sup>]] 23:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
17657 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17656 +++$+++ 17656 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312383240E09 +++$+++ I've started on your first (of ''seven''!!) e-mails. It's not a good start to see a claim about my alleged 'track record of being wrong'. In future, please ensure that you '''do not''' resort to ''ad hominem'' attacks, otherwise this conversation will cease.-- +++$+++ :I've started on your first (of ''seven''!!) e-mails. It's not a good start to see a claim about my alleged 'track record of being wrong'. In future, please ensure that you '''do not''' resort to ''ad hominem'' attacks, otherwise this conversation will cease.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 07:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
17658 +++$+++ Lighthead +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17656 +++$+++ 17657 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.312435680E09 +++$+++ This is like one of those Nordic sagas!  +++$+++ ::This is like one of those Nordic sagas! [[User:Lighthead|<b><font color="#CCCC00">'''Lighthead'''</font></b>]] [[User talk:Lighthead|<sup>þ</sup>]] 22:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
17659 +++$+++ Lighthead +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17656 +++$+++ 17657 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.312351920E09 +++$+++ Never mind. I see it.  +++$+++ ::Never mind. I see it. [[User:Lighthead|<b><font color="#CCCC00">'''Lighthead'''</font></b>]] [[User talk:Lighthead|<sup>þ</sup>]] 23:12, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
17660 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17656 +++$+++ 17657 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.312365900E09 +++$+++ You have obsolete and incomplete knowledge, Jeffro. Your informations are from your Bible Student Movement\xb4s family history and from limited and rigid reading. Main reason is that \"you just do not want\"! That\xb4s all. Whichever argument could not be successful, because you don\xb4t want to believe. It is deep inside brain. -- +++$+++ ::You have obsolete and incomplete knowledge, Jeffro. Your informations are from your Bible Student Movement´s family history and from limited and rigid reading. Main reason is that "you just do not want"! That´s all. Whichever argument could not be successful, because you don´t want to believe. It is deep inside brain. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 03:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
17661 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17656 +++$+++ 17660 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312383240E09 +++$+++ My knowledge on the subject is quite extensive. I don't have a \"Bible Student Movement's family history\".-- +++$+++ :::My knowledge on the subject is quite extensive. I don't have a "Bible Student Movement's family history".--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 07:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
17662 +++$+++ FaktneviM +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17656 +++$+++ 17661 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312395000E09 +++$+++ When you re-updated your knowledge last time? I suppose that you examined it only once, and 10 or more years ago. You had surely limited sources, which was that time available. Or even worse variation, you tried examining all yourself alone. And surprisingly (=NOT) you found some faults, which you was not able to explain. Easy. I know it. -- +++$+++ ::::When you re-updated your knowledge last time? I suppose that you examined it only once, and 10 or more years ago. You had surely limited sources, which was that time available. Or even worse variation, you tried examining all yourself alone. And surprisingly (=NOT) you found some faults, which you was not able to explain. Easy. I know it. --[[User:FaktneviM|Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM]] ([[User talk:FaktneviM|talk]]) 11:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
17663 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ Jeffro77 +++$+++ 17656 +++$+++ 17662 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.312398000E09 +++$+++ Your objection is called [[argument from ignorance]]. You are assuming that my knowledge or my sources must be insufficient because you don't like the fact that I don't agree with your beliefs. My knowledge on the matter is accurate and up to date.-- +++$+++ :::::Your objection is called [[argument from ignorance]]. You are assuming that my knowledge or my sources must be insufficient because you don't like the fact that I don't agree with your beliefs. My knowledge on the matter is accurate and up to date.--[[User:Jeffro77|<span style='color:#365F91'>'''Jeffro'''</span><span style='color:#FFC000'>''77''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeffro77|talk]]) 12:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

483540 +++$+++ B1atv +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483540 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-16 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.192596600E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your block of [[User:Ladiesman 347]].  Could you please check that it has worked, as the user appears to have created [[Arthur's mom]] after the block.  The time of block and article creation are the same but I did check for other posts after you placed the block notice on her talk page.  Many Thanks.   +++$+++ Thank you for your block of [[User:Ladiesman 347]].  Could you please check that it has worked, as the user appears to have created [[Arthur's mom]] after the block.  The time of block and article creation are the same but I did check for other posts after you placed the block notice on her talk page.  Many Thanks.  [[User:B1atv|B1atv]] 21:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
483541 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483540 +++$+++ 483540 +++$+++ 2007-10-16 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.192596840E09 +++$+++ Woops.  Yes, he slipped that one in under the wire.  It's gone now.  Nice catch.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Woops.  Yes, he slipped that one in under the wire.  It's gone now.  Nice catch.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 21:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
483542 +++$+++ B1atv +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483540 +++$+++ 483541 +++$+++ 2007-10-16 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.192597200E09 +++$+++ Cheers.   +++$+++ ::Cheers.  [[User:B1atv|B1atv]] 22:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

279803 +++$+++ UninvitedCompany +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-30 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.170225240E09 +++$+++ I added my statement, and would like to encourage you to contribute as well.   +++$+++ I added my statement, and would like to encourage you to contribute as well.  [[User:UninvitedCompany|The Uninvited]] Co., [[User_talk:UninvitedCompany|Inc.]] 22:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
279804 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279803 +++$+++ 279803 +++$+++ 2007-01-30 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.170225300E09 +++$+++ Thanks I will write something up.  +++$+++ :Thanks I will write something up. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

279805 +++$+++ Ideogram +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279805 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-31 06:17:00 +++$+++ 1.170253020E09 +++$+++ You are, of course, correct.  -- +++$+++ You are, of course, correct.  --[[User:Ideogram|Ideogram]] 06:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
279806 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279805 +++$+++ 279805 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.170315420E09 +++$+++ Thanks, umm correct about what?  +++$+++ :Thanks, umm correct about what? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
279807 +++$+++ Ideogram +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279805 +++$+++ 279806 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.170472440E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FArbitrators%27_views_regarding_IRC&diff=104520690&oldid=104520123 This].  -- +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FArbitrators%27_views_regarding_IRC&diff=104520690&oldid=104520123 This].  --[[User:Ideogram|Ideogram]] 19:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
279808 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279805 +++$+++ 279807 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.170473400E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'm glad you agree.  +++$+++ :::Thanks, I'm glad you agree. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

541950 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541950 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-10 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.189481760E09 +++$+++ I am smart<br>And you are dumb<br>You eat dirt<br>And suck your thumb<br>Kidding!  +++$+++ I am smart<br>And you are dumb<br>You eat dirt<br>And suck your thumb<br>Kidding! [[User:Dreamafter|<font color="Gold">Dr</font><font color="orange">ea</font><font color="red">my</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Dreamafter|<font color="indigo">\*/</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Dreamafter|<font color="lime">!$!</font>]]</sub> 20:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
541951 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541950 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.189481940E09 +++$+++ Besides, I'm rubber and you're glue. \u2014 +++$+++ ::Besides, I'm rubber and you're glue. —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 20:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

279809 +++$+++ Ideogram +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279809 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-02 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.170479640E09 +++$+++ Can I ask you a favor?  Can you suggest to Giano that edits such as [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Ideogram&curid=5305103&diff=105177935&oldid=104834640 this] are not a good idea?  -- +++$+++ Can I ask you a favor?  Can you suggest to Giano that edits such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ideogram&curid=5305103&diff=105177935&oldid=104834640 this] are not a good idea?  --[[User:Ideogram|Ideogram]] 21:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
279810 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279809 +++$+++ 279809 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.170480780E09 +++$+++ I wish now I had never asked you what edit you were referring to. Without your answer above, I doubt Giano or anyone else would have noticed (which was the point of my original edit). Giano knows that I don't think fighting fire with fire is appropriate &mdash; which is what he was doing, responding with a \"tit\", for your \"tat\", to which i see you have now responded with another \"tat\". I wish you both would just stop!  +++$+++ :I wish now I had never asked you what edit you were referring to. Without your answer above, I doubt Giano or anyone else would have noticed (which was the point of my original edit). Giano knows that I don't think fighting fire with fire is appropriate &mdash; which is what he was doing, responding with a "tit", for your "tat", to which i see you have now responded with another "tat". I wish you both would just stop! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
279811 +++$+++ Giano II +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279809 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.170481140E09 +++$+++ Of course I wouldn't have seen it, if he had not been so anxious to draw attention to it! it seemed a shame to deprive him.  +++$+++ :::Of course I wouldn't have seen it, if he had not been so anxious to draw attention to it! it seemed a shame to deprive him. [[User:Giano II|Giano]] 21:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
279812 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279809 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.170481500E09 +++$+++ Well in fairness to Ideogram I ''did'' ask. In perhaps a futile attempt to stop this, I have deleted both of your recent messages to each other, since I don't think either was constructive. I hope neither of you mind.  +++$+++ ::::Well in fairness to Ideogram I ''did'' ask. In perhaps a futile attempt to stop this, I have deleted both of your recent messages to each other, since I don't think either was constructive. I hope neither of you mind. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
279813 +++$+++ Ideogram +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279809 +++$+++ 279810 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.170481380E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that Paul.  I think we're ok for now.  -- +++$+++ ::Sorry about that Paul.  I think we're ok for now.  --[[User:Ideogram|Ideogram]] 21:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

279814 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279814 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-02 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.170484080E09 +++$+++ [[User:Ideogram|Ideogram]], [[User:Giano|Giano]] - It is really quite distressing to see you both trying to out-bait the other.  Please both just try to leave each other alone and write some articles (yes, Giano, I have seen the Ch\xe2teaux Grimaldi - very nice).  If you are at a loss for articles to write, the history of [[ice cream cone]]s is sadly neglected: [[Agnes Marshall]],  [[Carlo Gatti]], [[Italo Marchiony]], [[Ernst Hamwi]] all need articles. --  +++$+++ [[User:Ideogram|Ideogram]], [[User:Giano|Giano]] - It is really quite distressing to see you both trying to out-bait the other.  Please both just try to leave each other alone and write some articles (yes, Giano, I have seen the Châteaux Grimaldi - very nice).  If you are at a loss for articles to write, the history of [[ice cream cone]]s is sadly neglected: [[Agnes Marshall]],  [[Carlo Gatti]], [[Italo Marchiony]], [[Ernst Hamwi]] all need articles. -- [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 22:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
279815 +++$+++ Ideogram +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279814 +++$+++ 279814 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.170510660E09 +++$+++ ALoan, I take issue with your characterization of my activities as \"baiting\".  I included a little dig at Giano, Paul August quite rightly removed it, and, when I expressed appreciation for his edit the original edit was revealed.  Frankly, I am amazed at how many people put the blame on '''me''' when someone else is unable to control their temper.  -- +++$+++ :ALoan, I take issue with your characterization of my activities as "baiting".  I included a little dig at Giano, Paul August quite rightly removed it, and, when I expressed appreciation for his edit the original edit was revealed.  Frankly, I am amazed at how many people put the blame on '''me''' when someone else is unable to control their temper.  --[[User:Ideogram|Ideogram]] 05:51, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
279816 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279814 +++$+++ 279815 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.170511380E09 +++$+++ I see no meaningful difference between \"a little dig\" and \"baiting\". Ideogram please just stop.  +++$+++ ::I see no meaningful difference between "a little dig" and "baiting". Ideogram please just stop. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 06:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
279817 +++$+++ Ideogram +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279814 +++$+++ 279816 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.170511440E09 +++$+++ I am tired of being blamed for other people being unable to control their temper.  While I admit to needling people occasionally, it is not my responsibility to control someone else's temper.  If you want to play this game all I have to do is lose my temper over every little thing and I can blame everyone else for \"baiting\" me.  This pretty much sums up Giano, Irpen, Bishonen, and Geogre's behavior and it is why there is so much conflict between us.  -- +++$+++ :::I am tired of being blamed for other people being unable to control their temper.  While I admit to needling people occasionally, it is not my responsibility to control someone else's temper.  If you want to play this game all I have to do is lose my temper over every little thing and I can blame everyone else for "baiting" me.  This pretty much sums up Giano, Irpen, Bishonen, and Geogre's behavior and it is why there is so much conflict between us.  --[[User:Ideogram|Ideogram]] 06:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
279818 +++$+++ Geogre +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279814 +++$+++ 279814 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.170544200E09 +++$+++ The most important thing is that some arguments are, \"You are wrong.\"  Those can be answered.  Some are \"I am upset,\" and those cannot be entered into.  I think Ideogram's arguments are that he's unhappy.  That's too bad, but it's not our business.   +++$+++ *The most important thing is that some arguments are, "You are wrong."  Those can be answered.  Some are "I am upset," and those cannot be entered into.  I think Ideogram's arguments are that he's unhappy.  That's too bad, but it's not our business.  [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 15:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
279819 +++$+++ Ideogram +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279814 +++$+++ 279814 +++$+++ 2007-02-03 16:35:00 +++$+++ 1.170549300E09 +++$+++ I am not unhappy, and I have not lost my temper, although you apparently have.  I have noticed you try to \"spin\" reality with a dedication worthy of Pravda.  When will you learn that you can't make something true just by saying so?  -- +++$+++ :I am not unhappy, and I have not lost my temper, although you apparently have.  I have noticed you try to "spin" reality with a dedication worthy of Pravda.  When will you learn that you can't make something true just by saying so?  --[[User:Ideogram|Ideogram]] 16:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

17674 +++$+++ Belugaboy +++$+++ Hi878 +++$+++ 17674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-30 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.312054440E09 +++$+++ Hi, Hi878! I'm not sure if you remember me, but I was the creator of the MOTD Motto Shop. I retired for 3 months and I couldn't handle being away from Wikipedia, seeing how successful the Signpost and the Motto Shop and all my WikiProjects were doing, so I decided to come back. Now, I have every intention to become a personal motto creator again, Hi878, so could you explain all of the instructions to me? <small>And please, can you not hog all of the motto requests this time around?<\/small> Thanks so much! Warm regards, [[User:Belugaboy|<font color=\"#004730\" face=\"Georgia\">'''Beluga'''<\/font>]][[User talk:Belugaboy|<font color=\"#004730\" face=\"Chalkboard\">'''boy'''<\/font>]]''<sup> +++$+++ Hi, Hi878! I'm not sure if you remember me, but I was the creator of the MOTD Motto Shop. I retired for 3 months and I couldn't handle being away from Wikipedia, seeing how successful the Signpost and the Motto Shop and all my WikiProjects were doing, so I decided to come back. Now, I have every intention to become a personal motto creator again, Hi878, so could you explain all of the instructions to me? <small>And please, can you not hog all of the motto requests this time around?</small> Thanks so much! Warm regards, [[User:Belugaboy|<font color="#004730" face="Georgia">'''Beluga'''</font>]][[User talk:Belugaboy|<font color="#004730" face="Chalkboard">'''boy'''</font>]]''<sup>[[User:Belugaboy/guestbook|cup of tea?]]</sup>'' 12:34, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17675 +++$+++ Hi878 +++$+++ Hi878 +++$+++ 17674 +++$+++ 17674 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.312092900E09 +++$+++ I'm not hogging them, I wait a while before taking them, but nobody else is watching that page. :) I'm the only one. Have you seen where I wrote the instructions? I would like to think that I did a good job of describing them; if you haven't seen them, they are at the top of [[Wikipedia:Motto of the day\/Motto Shop\/Requests|this page]]. If you have any other questions, let me know! ~~  +++$+++ :I'm not hogging them, I wait a while before taking them, but nobody else is watching that page. :) I'm the only one. Have you seen where I wrote the instructions? I would like to think that I did a good job of describing them; if you haven't seen them, they are at the top of [[Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Motto Shop/Requests|this page]]. If you have any other questions, let me know! ~~ [[User:Hi878|<font style="color:#006400">Hi</font><font style="color:#DC143C">8</font><font style="color:#800000">7</font><font style="color:#FF4500">8</font>]]  <sup>[[User talk:Hi878|<font style="color:#0000CD">(''Come shout at me!'')</font>]]</sup> 23:15, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
17676 +++$+++ Belugaboy +++$+++ Hi878 +++$+++ 17674 +++$+++ 17675 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312099860E09 +++$+++ Yeah, sorry about that. XD. I check the page every half an hour, and it seems like less and less people are requesting mottos recently, from what I've looked at. I'll get us on the Signpost sidebar. Warm regards, [[User:Belugaboy|<font color=\"#004730\" face=\"Georgia\">'''Beluga'''<\/font>]][[User talk:Belugaboy|<font color=\"#004730\" face=\"Chalkboard\">'''boy'''<\/font>]]''<sup> +++$+++ ::Yeah, sorry about that. XD. I check the page every half an hour, and it seems like less and less people are requesting mottos recently, from what I've looked at. I'll get us on the Signpost sidebar. Warm regards, [[User:Belugaboy|<font color="#004730" face="Georgia">'''Beluga'''</font>]][[User talk:Belugaboy|<font color="#004730" face="Chalkboard">'''boy'''</font>]]''<sup>[[User:Belugaboy/guestbook|cup of tea?]]</sup>'' 01:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

279820 +++$+++ Kbolino +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279820 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-02 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.170461220E09 +++$+++ I left a note on the article talk page ([[Talk:Linear equation]]) explaining my reasoning; I'd like to know why \"recent changes that [you] don't think are helpful\" are so and why a complete revert was necessary.&mdash; +++$+++ I left a note on the article talk page ([[Talk:Linear equation]]) explaining my reasoning; I'd like to know why "recent changes that [you] don't think are helpful" are so and why a complete revert was necessary.&mdash;[[User:Kbolino|Kbolino]] 16:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
279821 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279820 +++$+++ 279820 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.170463740E09 +++$+++ I've replied on the talk page.  +++$+++ :I've replied on the talk page. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

279822 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-06 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.170825300E09 +++$+++ I've based a proposal on the mediation from the Piotrus-Ghirla case.  Your input would be welcome.  Please reply on the proposal talk page. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ I've based a proposal on the mediation from the Piotrus-Ghirla case.  Your input would be welcome.  Please reply on the proposal talk page. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 21:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
279823 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279822 +++$+++ 279822 +++$+++ 2007-02-06 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.170826260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up Durova. I think this is very much worth a try. I have responded at that talk page.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up Durova. I think this is very much worth a try. I have responded at that talk page. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

279825 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.170966540E09 +++$+++ This seems a little unnecessary to me, given we have [[:Category:Hilbert's problems]].  Given your area of expertise, do you have a view? --  +++$+++ This seems a little unnecessary to me, given we have [[:Category:Hilbert's problems]].  Given your area of expertise, do you have a view? -- [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 12:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
279826 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279825 +++$+++ 279825 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.170991320E09 +++$+++ I agree. I will take this up on the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics|Mathematics project's talk page]].  +++$+++ :I agree. I will take this up on the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics|Mathematics project's talk page]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
279827 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279825 +++$+++ 279826 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.170991500E09 +++$+++ Great - thanks. Navigational boxes are all well and good, but only where they add value, IMHO. --  +++$+++ ::Great - thanks. Navigational boxes are all well and good, but only where they add value, IMHO. -- [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 19:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

541970 +++$+++ violetriga +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-27 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.190954460E09 +++$+++ \"Weird thing to write\" or not - please don't ever remove my comments.   +++$+++ "Weird thing to write" or not - please don't ever remove my comments.  [[user:violetriga|violet/riga]] [[User_talk:violetriga|(t)]] 21:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
541971 +++$+++ violetriga +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541970 +++$+++ 541970 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.190955240E09 +++$+++ Replied on my talk.   +++$+++ :Replied on my talk.  [[user:violetriga|violet/riga]] [[User_talk:violetriga|(t)]] 21:54, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

506873 +++$+++ Eliz81 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-12 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.184276940E09 +++$+++ Greetings Bongwarrior! Just wanted to let you know that after reverting some vandalism to your user talk page, it looked suspicious so I reported it  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets\/Nate1501#.5B.5BUser:Nate1501.5D.5D here] as suspected sockpuppetry if there's anything you want to do to add to or modify the case. It's my first time reporting, so I wasn't sure if I had done it correctly. Here's hoping your talk page stays vandalism free! :)   +++$+++ Greetings Bongwarrior! Just wanted to let you know that after reverting some vandalism to your user talk page, it looked suspicious so I reported it  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Nate1501#.5B.5BUser:Nate1501.5D.5D here] as suspected sockpuppetry if there's anything you want to do to add to or modify the case. It's my first time reporting, so I wasn't sure if I had done it correctly. Here's hoping your talk page stays vandalism free! :)  [[User:Eliz81|Eliz81]] 14:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
506874 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506873 +++$+++ 506873 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.184277480E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot Eliz, and thanks for creating the report. I've been taking it on a case by case basis so far, but that's probably a better way to do it. I'll be sure to add to it later. Take care. -- +++$+++ :Thanks a lot Eliz, and thanks for creating the report. I've been taking it on a case by case basis so far, but that's probably a better way to do it. I'll be sure to add to it later. Take care. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] 14:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

279828 +++$+++ Giano II +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.170997560E09 +++$+++ How you and your colleaugues are getting on with your statements for posting here[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:IRC_channels\/Personal_views_regarding_IRC#Statement_by_Paul_August]?  +++$+++ How you and your colleaugues are getting on with your statements for posting here[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IRC_channels/Personal_views_regarding_IRC#Statement_by_Paul_August]? [[User:Giano II|Giano]] 21:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
279829 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279828 +++$+++ 279828 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.171001160E09 +++$+++ Mine is going slowly. Can't speak for the others.  +++$+++ :Mine is going slowly. Can't speak for the others. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

541973 +++$+++ Animum +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-29 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.191055320E09 +++$+++ {{tick|23}} '''Fixed''' \u2014<tt>[[<\/tt>''' +++$+++ {{tick|23}} '''Fixed''' —<tt>[[</tt>'''[[User:Animum|<font color="#002BB8">Animum</font>]]'''&nbsp;|&nbsp;'''''[[User_talk:Animum|<font color="#5A3696">talk</font>]]'''''<tt>]]</tt> 01:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
541974 +++$+++ Animum +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541973 +++$+++ 541973 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.191105960E09 +++$+++ I'll look into that in a bit; I'm getting some sustenance at the moment. [[Image:Face-smile.svg|25px]] \u2014<tt>[[<\/tt>''' +++$+++ :I'll look into that in a bit; I'm getting some sustenance at the moment. [[Image:Face-smile.svg|25px]] —<tt>[[</tt>'''[[User:Animum|<font color="#002BB8">Animum</font>]]'''&nbsp;|&nbsp;'''''[[User_talk:Animum|<font color="#5A3696">talk</font>]]'''''<tt>]]</tt> 15:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
541975 +++$+++ Animum +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541973 +++$+++ 541974 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.191106560E09 +++$+++ I was getting some food. I'll look into it... \u2014<tt>[[<\/tt>''' +++$+++ ::I was getting some food. I'll look into it... —<tt>[[</tt>'''[[User:Animum|<font color="#002BB8">Animum</font>]]'''&nbsp;|&nbsp;'''''[[User_talk:Animum|<font color="#5A3696">talk</font>]]'''''<tt>]]</tt> 15:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
541976 +++$+++ Metros +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541973 +++$+++ 541973 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.191058560E09 +++$+++ I have to agree with the IP here.  If you're resetting the box because someone has blanked it or removed the instructions, that's one thing.  But if you're resetting it immediately after every edit, that is inappropriate and needs to stop right away.  Thanks,  +++$+++ :I have to agree with the IP here.  If you're resetting the box because someone has blanked it or removed the instructions, that's one thing.  But if you're resetting it immediately after every edit, that is inappropriate and needs to stop right away.  Thanks, [[User:Metros|Metros]] 02:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
541977 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541973 +++$+++ 541976 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.191103740E09 +++$+++ Fine.  +++$+++ ::Fine. [[User:Dreamafter|<font color="Gold">Dr</font><font color="orange">ea</font><font color="red">my</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Dreamafter|<font color="indigo">\*/</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Dreamafter|<font color="lime">!$!</font>]]</sub> 15:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
541978 +++$+++ Metros +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541973 +++$+++ 541977 +++$+++ 2007-09-30 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.191144540E09 +++$+++ Why'd you say \"fine\" and then continue what I asked you not to do (like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Tutorial_%28Editing%29\/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=161198414 this reset]) later in the same day?   +++$+++ :::Why'd you say "fine" and then continue what I asked you not to do (like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Tutorial_%28Editing%29/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=161198414 this reset]) later in the same day?  [[User:Metros|Metros]] 02:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

279830 +++$+++ Ideogram +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279830 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.171000260E09 +++$+++ You have mail.  -- +++$+++ You have mail.  --[[User:Ideogram|Ideogram]] 21:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
279831 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279830 +++$+++ 279830 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.171002060E09 +++$+++ I've repled. (er replied)  +++$+++ :I've repled. (er replied) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
279832 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279830 +++$+++ 279831 +++$+++ 2007-02-09 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.171047120E09 +++$+++ Re-pled?  Did you plead a first time? --  +++$+++ ::Re-pled?  Did you plead a first time? -- [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 10:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
279833 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279830 +++$+++ 279832 +++$+++ 2007-02-09 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.171073220E09 +++$+++ Oh I plead and plead, like a voice in the wilderness sometimes.  +++$+++ :::Oh I plead and plead, like a voice in the wilderness sometimes. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
279834 +++$+++ Ideogram +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279830 +++$+++ 279833 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.171154220E09 +++$+++ If Paul August is lost in the wilderness, does he make a sound?  -- +++$+++ ::::If Paul August is lost in the wilderness, does he make a sound?  --[[User:Ideogram|Ideogram]] 16:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

17690 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-01 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.157144220E09 +++$+++ Hi. You created {{tl|UKWildcatsCoach}} and [[User:Rogerd]] created {{tl|UKyFbCoach}}. You two should talk and try and sort out how to merge the information on the two templates since they disagree slightly. The naming preference is the previous. Once the info has been merged, please delete the other template. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi. You created {{tl|UKWildcatsCoach}} and [[User:Rogerd]] created {{tl|UKyFbCoach}}. You two should talk and try and sort out how to merge the information on the two templates since they disagree slightly. The naming preference is the previous. Once the info has been merged, please delete the other template. Thanks. [[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 13:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
17691 +++$+++ Rogerd +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17690 +++$+++ 17690 +++$+++ 2006-09-03 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.157282820E09 +++$+++ [[Template:{{ucfirst:UKWildcatsCoach}}]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:UKWildcatsCoach|the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page]]. Thank you.<!-- Tfdnotice -->  +++$+++ :[[Template:{{ucfirst:UKWildcatsCoach}}]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:UKWildcatsCoach|the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page]]. Thank you.<!-- Tfdnotice --> [[User:Rogerd|rogerd]] 04:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
17692 +++$+++ Rogerd +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17690 +++$+++ 17690 +++$+++ 2006-09-03 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.157336100E09 +++$+++ The only problem with this so-called \"naming preference\" is it does not mention what sport it refers to.  There currently 10 UK Wildcats Head Coaches of various Men's sports, as well as 10 more Women's sports (which I admit my naming convention doesn't allow for).  There is also a {{tl|UKyBbCoach}}, and at the [[University of Kentucky]], as well as some other schools (UNC, Duke, Indiana), basketball is more prominent than football.  -- +++$+++ :The only problem with this so-called "naming preference" is it does not mention what sport it refers to.  There currently 10 UK Wildcats Head Coaches of various Men's sports, as well as 10 more Women's sports (which I admit my naming convention doesn't allow for).  There is also a {{tl|UKyBbCoach}}, and at the [[University of Kentucky]], as well as some other schools (UNC, Duke, Indiana), basketball is more prominent than football.  --[[User:Rogerd|rogerd]] 19:15, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

541980 +++$+++ Domer48 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-21 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.190387940E09 +++$+++ Hi Dreamafter, could you tell me what's happening with the mediation, as it seems you are asking for final thoughts but I would like to know what's going to happen next. Are the arguments presented going to be discussed? -- +++$+++ Hi Dreamafter, could you tell me what's happening with the mediation, as it seems you are asking for final thoughts but I would like to know what's going to happen next. Are the arguments presented going to be discussed? --[[User:Domer48|Domer48]] 08:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
541981 +++$+++ Hughsheehy +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541980 +++$+++ 541980 +++$+++ 2007-10-04 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.191512280E09 +++$+++ Same question from me.   +++$+++ :Same question from me.  [[User:Hughsheehy|Hughsheehy]] 08:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

279837 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-10 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.171142580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification.   +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] 13:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
279838 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279837 +++$+++ 279837 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.171142760E09 +++$+++ You're welcome.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

541982 +++$+++ Lyricmac +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-02 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.191383760E09 +++$+++ My dear Dreamafter, I am certain that you meant well, but please allow an old teacher his idiosyncresy:  It was my choice to spell the suffix in the archaic form on my user page and, as this is still an accepted practice, I wish it to remain thus.  Wishing you the best of the day,-- +++$+++ My dear Dreamafter, I am certain that you meant well, but please allow an old teacher his idiosyncresy:  It was my choice to spell the suffix in the archaic form on my user page and, as this is still an accepted practice, I wish it to remain thus.  Wishing you the best of the day,--[[User:Lyricmac|Lyricmac]] 20:56, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
541983 +++$+++ Lyricmac +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541982 +++$+++ 541982 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.191409380E09 +++$+++ A dashed border?  I'm familiar with the term, my friend, however I don't see one on my user page.  Would you be so kind as to explain?  Thank you.-- +++$+++ :A dashed border?  I'm familiar with the term, my friend, however I don't see one on my user page.  Would you be so kind as to explain?  Thank you.--[[User:Lyricmac|Lyricmac]] 04:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

279839 +++$+++ Purples +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-11 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.171194240E09 +++$+++ I read with great concern about a high-ranking user's conduct - namely essjay's lying to the New Yorker about who he was whilst representing Wikipedia - and his apparent attitude to the..erm 'flexibility' of the truth - reminds me a little of Lord Archer in the UK. Anyway - I wonder if the Arb Com would have jurisdiction over essjay's various high-ranking positions here at wikipedia if a case were to be brought? - If you (plural) found his conduct unethical, would you be empowered to do anything about it? - I came to you because you seem to be impartial, and i respect your thoughts.... thank you,  +++$+++ I read with great concern about a high-ranking user's conduct - namely essjay's lying to the New Yorker about who he was whilst representing Wikipedia - and his apparent attitude to the..erm 'flexibility' of the truth - reminds me a little of Lord Archer in the UK. Anyway - I wonder if the Arb Com would have jurisdiction over essjay's various high-ranking positions here at wikipedia if a case were to be brought? - If you (plural) found his conduct unethical, would you be empowered to do anything about it? - I came to you because you seem to be impartial, and i respect your thoughts.... thank you, [[User:Purples|Purples]] 03:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
279840 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279839 +++$+++ 279839 +++$+++ 2007-02-11 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.171200420E09 +++$+++ Read what where?  +++$+++ :Read what where? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 05:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

279841 +++$+++ Purples +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-11 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.171205580E09 +++$+++ He now admits to having made all that up, and I don't think that's right - not to mention that it could really harm the credibility of wikipedia in various communities. I'm not sure why I came to you other than the fact that you seem a very decent chap. Many thanks,  +++$+++ He now admits to having made all that up, and I don't think that's right - not to mention that it could really harm the credibility of wikipedia in various communities. I'm not sure why I came to you other than the fact that you seem a very decent chap. Many thanks, [[User:Purples|Purples]] 06:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
279842 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279841 +++$+++ 279841 +++$+++ 2007-02-11 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.171206120E09 +++$+++ Where does he admit that this is all not true?  +++$+++ :Where does he admit that this is all not true? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 07:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

17699 +++$+++ Shirt58 +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-08 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.173350100E09 +++$+++ A compulsory secondary school US history topic, perhaps?  A suggestion for your watchlist, if it's not already there.  -- +++$+++ A compulsory secondary school US history topic, perhaps?  A suggestion for your watchlist, if it's not already there.  --[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] 02:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
17700 +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17699 +++$+++ 17699 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.173504720E09 +++$+++ Wish I knew why.  Its on my watchlist already.  Thanks.   +++$+++ :Wish I knew why.  Its on my watchlist already.  Thanks.  [[User:Kgwo1972|Kgwo1972]] 21:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

279848 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279848 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.171675620E09 +++$+++ [[User_talk:204.100.129.254]] This IP has a long history of vandalism and you have blocked him for a month last month. He came back and has continued to vandalize wikipedia pages. He recently vandalized the [[Anabolic steroid]] article just a few minutes ago.  +++$+++ [[User_talk:204.100.129.254]] This IP has a long history of vandalism and you have blocked him for a month last month. He came back and has continued to vandalize wikipedia pages. He recently vandalized the [[Anabolic steroid]] article just a few minutes ago. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 17:27, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
279849 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279848 +++$+++ 279848 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.171675920E09 +++$+++ I've now blocked for six months.  +++$+++ :I've now blocked for six months. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
279850 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279848 +++$+++ 279849 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.171676340E09 +++$+++ Thank you. +++$+++ ::Thank you.[[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 17:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

17707 +++$+++ Rockfang +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-15 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.200433980E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale --> [[User:Rockfang|Rockfang]] ([[User talk:Rockfang|talk]]) 13:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
17708 +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17707 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-29 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.201671060E09 +++$+++ Sorry to not respond sooner, of course you can use the image!  I will try to move it over Commons, although I have not done that particular move before.  I looked at your Royals ariticle, and it is very impressive! - +++$+++ **Sorry to not respond sooner, of course you can use the image!  I will try to move it over Commons, although I have not done that particular move before.  I looked at your Royals ariticle, and it is very impressive! -[[User:Kgwo1972|Kgwo1972]] ([[User talk:Kgwo1972#top|talk]]) 21:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
17709 +++$+++ Clio64B +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17707 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-27 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.204151280E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot. Yours in sports!  +++$+++ ***Thanks a lot. Yours in sports! [[User:Clio64B|Clio64B]] ([[User talk:Clio64B|talk]]) 14:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

279853 +++$+++ UninvitedCompany +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279853 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-08 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.173359220E09 +++$+++ If so, please fix; if not, please explain.   +++$+++ If so, please fix; if not, please explain.  [[User:UninvitedCompany|The Uninvited]] Co., [[User_talk:UninvitedCompany|Inc.]] 05:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
279854 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279853 +++$+++ 279853 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.173405540E09 +++$+++ Sorry. Yes it was an accicent. Don't know how that happened, probably an edit confilict. I will fix it if it hasn't already been.  +++$+++ :Sorry. Yes it was an accicent. Don't know how that happened, probably an edit confilict. I will fix it if it hasn't already been. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

279855 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-08 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.173391980E09 +++$+++ I saw your rewording of remedy #5 re Freakofnurture ... but it still reads prospectively ... how about \"have been restored\"? Regards,  +++$+++ I saw your rewording of remedy #5 re Freakofnurture ... but it still reads prospectively ... how about "have been restored"? Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 14:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
279856 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279855 +++$+++ 279855 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.173407520E09 +++$+++ Done. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Done. Thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

279857 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-08 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.173415740E09 +++$+++ I'm assuming the second man is a mathematician. ;-) -- +++$+++ I'm assuming the second man is a mathematician. ;-) --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 20:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
279858 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279857 +++$+++ 279857 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.173415920E09 +++$+++ I laughed out loud, always a good feeling. And good timing, I needed a laugh just now.  +++$+++ :I laughed out loud, always a good feeling. And good timing, I needed a laugh just now. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
279859 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279857 +++$+++ 279858 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.173449880E09 +++$+++ Remember, the university is much bigger than Wikipedia. [[Archimedes]] died at the hands of an ignorant Roman soldier, the [[Library of Alexandria]] suffered repeated fires and indignities, and the [[Maya codices]] were purposely destroyed by the Spanish. So far the sentient reptiles inhabiting exoplanet [[OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb]] seem completely unmoved by any of these tragedies, as they are still coming to grips with the passing of the dinosaurs. <tt><:-O<\/tt>  -- +++$+++ :: Remember, the university is much bigger than Wikipedia. [[Archimedes]] died at the hands of an ignorant Roman soldier, the [[Library of Alexandria]] suffered repeated fires and indignities, and the [[Maya codices]] were purposely destroyed by the Spanish. So far the sentient reptiles inhabiting exoplanet [[OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb]] seem completely unmoved by any of these tragedies, as they are still coming to grips with the passing of the dinosaurs. <tt><:-O</tt>  --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 06:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
279860 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279857 +++$+++ 279859 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.173466680E09 +++$+++ Sentient reptiles living on a planet of 5&nbsp;[[Earth mass]]es with a surface temperature of 50&nbsp;K (-223\xb0C)?  Do they have [[List of elements by melting point|liquid helium, hydrogen or neon]] for blood? --  +++$+++ :::Sentient reptiles living on a planet of 5&nbsp;[[Earth mass]]es with a surface temperature of 50&nbsp;K (-223°C)?  Do they have [[List of elements by melting point|liquid helium, hydrogen or neon]] for blood? -- [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 10:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
279861 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279857 +++$+++ 279860 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.173468540E09 +++$+++ Obviously these sentient reptiles differ somewhat from the common terrestrial reptile; but then, so did dinosaurs. <tt>;-)<\/tt> -- +++$+++ :::: Obviously these sentient reptiles differ somewhat from the common terrestrial reptile; but then, so did dinosaurs. <tt>;-)</tt> --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 11:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
279862 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279857 +++$+++ 279861 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.173471660E09 +++$+++ TMBSSNMOTW\"reptile\"OWIWNPA. HAND. --  +++$+++ :::::TMBSSNMOTW"reptile"OWIWNPA. HAND. -- [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 12:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
279863 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279857 +++$+++ 279862 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.173488580E09 +++$+++ WF, WSCAOCUOA!  +++$+++ ::::::WF, WSCAOCUOA! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
279864 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279857 +++$+++ 279859 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.173488580E09 +++$+++ KSmrq, yes, but [[Total Perspective Vortex|having a sense of proportion]] can be dangerous!  +++$+++ :::KSmrq, yes, but [[Total Perspective Vortex|having a sense of proportion]] can be dangerous! [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

17718 +++$+++ Grey Wanderer +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-03 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.252028640E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit removing the statement that Kansas has no major league teams.  I wanted to write you a personal note because I see your edits a lot and think they're quite good.  According to [[U.S._states_without_major_sports_teams]] and [[Major professional sports leagues of the United States and Canada]] Kansas is one of 25 states without a major league sports franchise (Football, Baseball, Basketball, and Hockey).  I think you were thinking of soccer which is not considered a major league sport in the [[United States]].  Thanks!  +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit removing the statement that Kansas has no major league teams.  I wanted to write you a personal note because I see your edits a lot and think they're quite good.  According to [[U.S._states_without_major_sports_teams]] and [[Major professional sports leagues of the United States and Canada]] Kansas is one of 25 states without a major league sports franchise (Football, Baseball, Basketball, and Hockey).  I think you were thinking of soccer which is not considered a major league sport in the [[United States]].  Thanks! [[User:Grey Wanderer|Grey Wanderer]] ([[User talk:Grey Wanderer|talk]]) 18:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
17719 +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17718 +++$+++ 17718 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.252029660E09 +++$+++ OK, works for me (I was thinking of soccer).  Thanks for the note and the compliment! - +++$+++ :OK, works for me (I was thinking of soccer).  Thanks for the note and the compliment! -[[User:Kgwo1972|Kgwo1972]] ([[User talk:Kgwo1972#top|talk]]) 19:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

542007 +++$+++ Goodshoped35110s +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542007 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-13 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.192266660E09 +++$+++ Green's OK, and I haven't really tried it yet.  +++$+++ Green's OK, and I haven't really tried it yet. [[User:Goodshoped35110s|Goodshoped35110s]] 02:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
542008 +++$+++ Goodshoped35110s +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542007 +++$+++ 542007 +++$+++ 2007-10-13 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.192266960E09 +++$+++ Oh, and [[User talk:Allstarecho]] needs help. Something about a template input\/output.  +++$+++ :Oh, and [[User talk:Allstarecho]] needs help. Something about a template input/output. [[User:Goodshoped35110s|Goodshoped35110s]] 02:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
542009 +++$+++ Goodshoped35110s +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542007 +++$+++ 542008 +++$+++ 2007-10-13 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.192276020E09 +++$+++ Oh, and how do I program the signature on my preferences? Because it comes out like : +++$+++ ::Oh, and how do I program the signature on my preferences? Because it comes out like :[[User:Goodshoped35110s|&#91;&#91;User:Goodshoped35110s&#124;&lt;font color=&quot;#006400&quot;&gt;Good&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#008000&quot;&gt;shop&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#228B22&quot;&gt;ed35&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#32CD32&quot;&gt;110s&lt;/font&gt;]]&lt;sup&gt;&#91;&#91;User talk:Goodshoped35110s&#124;&lt;font color=&quot;#000080&quot;&gt;My T&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#4169E1&quot;&gt;alk!&lt;/fo]] 04:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

279866 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-17 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.174132740E09 +++$+++ Paul, query for you [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration\/InShaneee\/Proposed decision|here]]. Cheers,  +++$+++ Paul, query for you [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/InShaneee/Proposed decision|here]]. Cheers, [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 04:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
279867 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279866 +++$+++ 279866 +++$+++ 2007-03-18 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.174258560E09 +++$+++ Hi Slim, I've replied there.  +++$+++ :Hi Slim, I've replied there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
279868 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279866 +++$+++ 279867 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.174295820E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul, a response for you. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FInShaneee%2FProposed_decision&diff=116159986&oldid=116155125] Your proposal will be misused by every troll who learns about it, so I'd appreciate it if you would reconsider or reword. ArbCom isn't supposed to change policy or long-standing practise.  +++$+++ ::Hi Paul, a response for you. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FInShaneee%2FProposed_decision&diff=116159986&oldid=116155125] Your proposal will be misused by every troll who learns about it, so I'd appreciate it if you would reconsider or reword. ArbCom isn't supposed to change policy or long-standing practise. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 02:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
279869 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279866 +++$+++ 279868 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.174297380E09 +++$+++ I agree with UC's recent statement there.  +++$+++ :::I agree with UC's recent statement there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

17723 +++$+++ Paulmcdonald +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-30 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.270000020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for catching my error in the [[Hobbs Adams]] article.  I was sure I had it right--but I did not!-- +++$+++ Thanks for catching my error in the [[Hobbs Adams]] article.  I was sure I had it right--but I did not!--[[User:Paulmcdonald|Paul McDonald]] ([[User talk:Paulmcdonald|talk]]) 18:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
17724 +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17723 +++$+++ 17723 +++$+++ 2010-03-30 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.270001640E09 +++$+++ You bet, thanks for the note and your hard work, also! - +++$+++ :You bet, thanks for the note and your hard work, also! -[[User:Kgwo1972|Kgwo1972]] ([[User talk:Kgwo1972#top|talk]]) 19:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

279870 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279870 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.174515600E09 +++$+++ I like your changes on the \/Proposed decision template. I don't know if it's on your to-do list, but the introductory paragraph of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Template\/Workshop]] could probably use some streamlining as well. Regards,  +++$+++ I like your changes on the /Proposed decision template. I don't know if it's on your to-do list, but the introductory paragraph of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Template/Workshop]] could probably use some streamlining as well. Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 15:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
279871 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279870 +++$+++ 279870 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.174516200E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your suggestion{{{{#if:notsubsted||subst:}}#if:{{{1|}}}|&#32;regarding [[:{{{1}}}]]}}! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a [[wiki]], so ''anyone'' can edit almost any article by simply following the '''{{MediaWiki:edit}}''' link at the top. You don't even need to [[Special:Userlogin|log in]] (although there are [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|many reasons why you might want to]]).  The Wikipedia community encourages you to [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|be bold in updating pages]]. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes \u2014 they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out [[Wikipedia:how to edit a page|''how to edit a page'']], or use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] to try out your editing skills.  [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|New contributors are always welcome]].<!-- Template:Sofixit --> &mdash; Sorry couldn't resist ;-)  +++$+++ :Thank you for your suggestion{{{{#if:notsubsted||subst:}}#if:{{{1|}}}|&#32;regarding [[:{{{1}}}]]}}! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a [[wiki]], so ''anyone'' can edit almost any article by simply following the '''{{MediaWiki:edit}}''' link at the top. You don't even need to [[Special:Userlogin|log in]] (although there are [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|many reasons why you might want to]]).  The Wikipedia community encourages you to [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|be bold in updating pages]]. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out [[Wikipedia:how to edit a page|''how to edit a page'']], or use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] to try out your editing skills.  [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|New contributors are always welcome]].<!-- Template:Sofixit --> &mdash; Sorry couldn't resist ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
279872 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279870 +++$+++ 279871 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.174516380E09 +++$+++ Can just an 'umble clerk really touch such an important page as that? :)  +++$+++ ::Can just an 'umble clerk really touch such an important page as that? :) [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 15:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
279873 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279870 +++$+++ 279870 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.174516620E09 +++$+++ There's one sure fire way to find out. ;-)  +++$+++ :There's one sure fire way to find out. ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
279874 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279870 +++$+++ 279873 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.174520760E09 +++$+++ Okay, I played with it a bit&mdash;comments appreciated.  +++$+++ ::Okay, I played with it a bit&mdash;comments appreciated. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 16:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
279875 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279870 +++$+++ 279870 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.174529760E09 +++$+++ An improvement.  +++$+++ :An improvement. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

17730 +++$+++ Grandpa jlc +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-24 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.290639840E09 +++$+++ That long introduction is by way of anticipating that it won't be long before a WP editor wishes to somehow enter the Nebraska-Iowa contest as Farmageddon--either trying to usurp the article you wrote or at least modify it so as to indicate that there are two rivalries which are referred to as Farmageddon.  A posting in a forum on the fan site I mentioned, [http:\/\/www.cyclonefanatic.com\/forum\/football\/102218-farmageddon.html Cyclone.Fanatic.com], even speculates that the K-State vs. ISU rivalry will no longer be called Farmageddon.  Since you seem to be much more involved in college sports than I, you are probably way ahead of me in your knowledge of this topic, but I figured I would mention it in case there was something proactive you thought could be done to make sure that the earlier usage of the term did not get lost in the hub-bub related to the new rivalry.-- +++$+++ That long introduction is by way of anticipating that it won't be long before a WP editor wishes to somehow enter the Nebraska-Iowa contest as Farmageddon--either trying to usurp the article you wrote or at least modify it so as to indicate that there are two rivalries which are referred to as Farmageddon.  A posting in a forum on the fan site I mentioned, [http://www.cyclonefanatic.com/forum/football/102218-farmageddon.html Cyclone.Fanatic.com], even speculates that the K-State vs. ISU rivalry will no longer be called Farmageddon.  Since you seem to be much more involved in college sports than I, you are probably way ahead of me in your knowledge of this topic, but I figured I would mention it in case there was something proactive you thought could be done to make sure that the earlier usage of the term did not get lost in the hub-bub related to the new rivalry.--[[User:Grandpa jlc|Grandpa jlc]] ([[User talk:Grandpa jlc|talk]]) 15:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
17731 +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ Kgwo1972 +++$+++ 17730 +++$+++ 17730 +++$+++ 2010-11-29 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.291094580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your note!  I started that article by using material about the rivalry that someone had (wrongly) included in an article about the comic strip of the same name.  Other editors have done a lot of work on the page since that time.  I do keep an eye on that article (on my watchlist) and I have actually been meaning to make some edits over there.  Hope you enjoyed the 2009 game (despite the outcome).  - +++$+++ : Thanks for your note!  I started that article by using material about the rivalry that someone had (wrongly) included in an article about the comic strip of the same name.  Other editors have done a lot of work on the page since that time.  I do keep an eye on that article (on my watchlist) and I have actually been meaning to make some edits over there.  Hope you enjoyed the 2009 game (despite the outcome).  -[[User:Kgwo1972|Kgwo1972]] ([[User talk:Kgwo1972#top|talk]]) 21:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

279876 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279876 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-22 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.174613160E09 +++$+++ If you're going to do my job every time I step away from the keyboard, there's no point in having me. :) Regards,  +++$+++ If you're going to do my job every time I step away from the keyboard, there's no point in having me. :) Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 18:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
279877 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279876 +++$+++ 279876 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.174613820E09 +++$+++ I always try to make people feel as useless as I can ;-)  +++$+++ :I always try to make people feel as useless as I can ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
279878 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279876 +++$+++ 279877 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.174613940E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I'll reciprocate by casting some votes for you the next time you're away. :)  +++$+++ ::Thanks, I'll reciprocate by casting some votes for you the next time you're away. :) [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 18:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
279879 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279876 +++$+++ 279876 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.174614300E09 +++$+++ That'd be great!   +++$+++ :That'd be great!  [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

17735 +++$+++ Leasnam +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-20 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.282372800E09 +++$+++ Hello. I saw where you changed ''intimate relations'' to ''close relations''. I am fine with that, however, when I wrote intimate, I meant just that: intimate. Danes and English were parts of each others' lives, they lived together, worked together and intermarried.  No other word, not even ''close'', quite does this justice. :)  +++$+++ Hello. I saw where you changed ''intimate relations'' to ''close relations''. I am fine with that, however, when I wrote intimate, I meant just that: intimate. Danes and English were parts of each others' lives, they lived together, worked together and intermarried.  No other word, not even ''close'', quite does this justice. :) [[User:Leasnam|Leasnam]] ([[User talk:Leasnam|talk]]) 23:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
17736 +++$+++ Leasnam +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17735 +++$+++ 17735 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.282373040E09 +++$+++ I added \"-knit\" to make it \"close-knit\". This seems to do it a little more justice.  +++$+++ : I added "-knit" to make it "close-knit". This seems to do it a little more justice. [[User:Leasnam|Leasnam]] ([[User talk:Leasnam|talk]]) 23:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

279880 +++$+++ Artaxiad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279880 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-28 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.175073960E09 +++$+++ Hi quick question regarding the votes, do we get to defend our selves at all? or just let it go until we get banned.  +++$+++ Hi quick question regarding the votes, do we get to defend our selves at all? or just let it go until we get banned. [[User:Artaxiad|Artaxiad]] 02:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
279881 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279880 +++$+++ 279880 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.175074260E09 +++$+++ You can comment on the proposed decision at [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration\/Armenia-Azerbaijan\/Proposed decision]].  +++$+++ :You can comment on the proposed decision at [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan/Proposed decision]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
279882 +++$+++ Artaxiad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279880 +++$+++ 279881 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.175074560E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm not really sure if everyone reads them, I think we all should have a final comment on the decision, I do stupid things sometimes I apologize, alot of users are also upset because of this, all once good contributors now half the ethnic community is being banned all of which are positive I don't mind myself that much, this is my first case so I'm clueless so after the majority of votes go for ban do we get banned immediately I mean a finally comment would do, but yet again if I do everyone is going to reply clogging it up other editors and I don't have the nerves to debate anymore, this case is long and stressing, going for non-arb members who will debate with me, regards.  +++$+++ ::Yeah, I'm not really sure if everyone reads them, I think we all should have a final comment on the decision, I do stupid things sometimes I apologize, alot of users are also upset because of this, all once good contributors now half the ethnic community is being banned all of which are positive I don't mind myself that much, this is my first case so I'm clueless so after the majority of votes go for ban do we get banned immediately I mean a finally comment would do, but yet again if I do everyone is going to reply clogging it up other editors and I don't have the nerves to debate anymore, this case is long and stressing, going for non-arb members who will debate with me, regards. [[User:Artaxiad|Artaxiad]] 02:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
279883 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279880 +++$+++ 279880 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.175075040E09 +++$+++ I read that page, I'm sure others do as well. And it will remain there as part of the case records, for future review.  +++$+++ :I read that page, I'm sure others do as well. And it will remain there as part of the case records, for future review. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
279884 +++$+++ Artaxiad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279880 +++$+++ 279883 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.175075160E09 +++$+++ That's good, but I just don't want people to bash me, its pretty annoying and old, I'm sure others will comment on it immediately.  +++$+++ ::That's good, but I just don't want people to bash me, its pretty annoying and old, I'm sure others will comment on it immediately. [[User:Artaxiad|Artaxiad]] 02:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
279885 +++$+++ Artaxiad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279880 +++$+++ 279880 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.175076420E09 +++$+++ Hi I made a statement here if you wanted to fly by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Artaxiad\/Letter] thanks for your cooperation.  +++$+++ :Hi I made a statement here if you wanted to fly by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Artaxiad/Letter] thanks for your cooperation. [[User:Artaxiad|Artaxiad]] 03:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
279886 +++$+++ Artaxiad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279880 +++$+++ 279885 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.175078460E09 +++$+++ By the way regarding Azerbaijani, he's only edit warred in a few articles, not to mention those articles are unrelated to this case, so presenting them here is not fair its like bringing in a user from another article on sports who reverted here to be paroled for edit warring, hes never attacked anyone very positive contributer, he was added by Grandmaster who has been adding unrelated users just because he has edit warred with them so that they can be punished so they wont have the advantage, by the way if I'm bothering you feel free to remove this.  +++$+++ ::By the way regarding Azerbaijani, he's only edit warred in a few articles, not to mention those articles are unrelated to this case, so presenting them here is not fair its like bringing in a user from another article on sports who reverted here to be paroled for edit warring, hes never attacked anyone very positive contributer, he was added by Grandmaster who has been adding unrelated users just because he has edit warred with them so that they can be punished so they wont have the advantage, by the way if I'm bothering you feel free to remove this. [[User:Artaxiad|Artaxiad]] 03:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
279887 +++$+++ Artaxiad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279880 +++$+++ 279880 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.175137080E09 +++$+++ Please see this and block as soon as possible, parole violation, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Block]  +++$+++ :Please see this and block as soon as possible, parole violation, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Block] [[User:Artaxiad|Artaxiad]] 19:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

17740 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17740 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-18 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.292701920E09 +++$+++ but hell if you were to do a typical afd 'count the examples' is it a bit even at http:\/\/henrietta.liswa.wa.gov.au\/search\/?searchtype=X&SORT=D&searcharg=lee-steere&searchscope=2&submit.x=42&submit.y=14&submit=Submit  +++$+++ but hell if you were to do a typical afd 'count the examples' is it a bit even at http://henrietta.liswa.wa.gov.au/search/?searchtype=X&SORT=D&searcharg=lee-steere&searchscope=2&submit.x=42&submit.y=14&submit=Submit [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 11:52, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
17741 +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17740 +++$+++ 17740 +++$+++ 2010-12-19 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.292757300E09 +++$+++ I've copied your comments above to [[Talk:James George Lee Steere]], and will address them there. We should continue the conversation on the article talk page rather than here. Thanks.  +++$+++ :I've copied your comments above to [[Talk:James George Lee Steere]], and will address them there. We should continue the conversation on the article talk page rather than here. Thanks. [[User:Mitch Ames|Mitch Ames]] ([[User talk:Mitch Ames#top|talk]]) 03:15, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
17742 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17740 +++$+++ 17741 +++$+++ 2010-12-19 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.292760240E09 +++$+++ btw best wishes for the silly season - it would be great to see my daggy comments at the top of your talk page retired sometime - hope you feel brave enough to archive them out of the way sometime :)  +++$+++ ::btw best wishes for the silly season - it would be great to see my daggy comments at the top of your talk page retired sometime - hope you feel brave enough to archive them out of the way sometime :) [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 04:04, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
17743 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17740 +++$+++ 17742 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.292968260E09 +++$+++ again - could you either archive - or let me removed my daggy comments at the top of the page please... - my memory of the alcoholic offspring of the double barrelled name leaves me out of the rather extended comments - its becomes tedious at that point - a simple aka or footnote might suffice - ''simply that at some stage only some members of part of the family used a hyphen in the name'' - cheers - have a safe christmas!  +++$+++ :::again - could you either archive - or let me removed my daggy comments at the top of the page please... - my memory of the alcoholic offspring of the double barrelled name leaves me out of the rather extended comments - its becomes tedious at that point - a simple aka or footnote might suffice - ''simply that at some stage only some members of part of the family used a hyphen in the name'' - cheers - have a safe christmas! [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 13:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
17744 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17740 +++$+++ 17741 +++$+++ 2010-12-22 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.293042840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that - appreciated - hope we might see you at the WP 10th birthday celebrations in january?  +++$+++ ::Thanks for that - appreciated - hope we might see you at the WP 10th birthday celebrations in january? [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 10:34, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

542030 +++$+++ Goodshoped35110s +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-17 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.192616460E09 +++$+++ Hi. You may remember me with the fatal flaws over at my pages. You see, at first, I was trying that blue floating thing you had on your userpage, so I tried it, got a message telling me to take it down before someone getting me in trouble because, what the blue thing is annoying (although it does help in some way) that can get you in trouble in some way. Talk to [[User:GlassCobra]]. --[[User:Goodshoped35110s|<font color=\"#006400\">Goodsh<\/font>]][[User talk:Goodshoped35110s|<font color=\"grey\">oped3<\/font>]][[Special:Contributions\/Goodshoped35110s|<font color=\"lightgreen\">511<\/font>]] +++$+++ Hi. You may remember me with the fatal flaws over at my pages. You see, at first, I was trying that blue floating thing you had on your userpage, so I tried it, got a message telling me to take it down before someone getting me in trouble because, what the blue thing is annoying (although it does help in some way) that can get you in trouble in some way. Talk to [[User:GlassCobra]]. --[[User:Goodshoped35110s|<font color="#006400">Goodsh</font>]][[User talk:Goodshoped35110s|<font color="grey">oped3</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Goodshoped35110s|<font color="lightgreen">511</font>]][[User:Goodshoped35110s/Gallery Intro|0s]] 03:21, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
542031 +++$+++ GlassCobra +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542030 +++$+++ 542030 +++$+++ 2007-10-17 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.192651620E09 +++$+++ Yes, you're right, there's no policy against it. I was wrong to say that Goodshoped could get in trouble; however, those boxes are definitely pretty disruptive and make reading your page kind of tough. Yours isn't quite as audacious as his was, though. So, you're right, I guess nothing will really come from it, but maybe you could take yours down anyway as a courtesy to those who view your page. Also, could you perhaps be a bit more civil on my talk page from now on?  +++$+++ :Yes, you're right, there's no policy against it. I was wrong to say that Goodshoped could get in trouble; however, those boxes are definitely pretty disruptive and make reading your page kind of tough. Yours isn't quite as audacious as his was, though. So, you're right, I guess nothing will really come from it, but maybe you could take yours down anyway as a courtesy to those who view your page. Also, could you perhaps be a bit more civil on my talk page from now on? [[User:GlassCobra|Glass]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|Cobra]]''' 13:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

279889 +++$+++ Dacy69 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-28 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.175140860E09 +++$+++ You have proposed to soften a measure against [[user:Eupator]]. But just today he again removed sourced information put by several users on page [[Yerevan]] without substantial explanation [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Yerevan&curid=34352&diff=118607468&oldid=118602285]-- +++$+++ You have proposed to soften a measure against [[user:Eupator]]. But just today he again removed sourced information put by several users on page [[Yerevan]] without substantial explanation [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yerevan&curid=34352&diff=118607468&oldid=118602285]--[[User:Dacy69|Dacy69]] 21:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
279890 +++$+++ Thatcher131 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279889 +++$+++ 279889 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.175141940E09 +++$+++ As a content matter, the \"source\" is a tourist guide produced by an embassy employee who says \"As the after-hours work of a non-specialist who has had time to visit only a selection of the sites mentioned, this guide is far from a complete archaeological, historical, cultural and\/or practical guidebook to Armenia.\"  Surely if the facts alleged are true then are additional significant sources to be found.  Assuming editors are capable of working politely and cooperatively with each other, the replacement of less reliable and\/or biased sources with more reliable and\/or unbiased sources happens all the time without controversy on hundreds of articles every day.  As an arbitration matter, while I can not speak for Paul, it seems that he found the evidence for edit warring persuasive but the evidence for personal attacks lacking; hence the editing restriction rather than a site ban.  If mere edit warring were enough for a site ban, you would be on the same bus out of town.  +++$+++ :As a content matter, the "source" is a tourist guide produced by an embassy employee who says "As the after-hours work of a non-specialist who has had time to visit only a selection of the sites mentioned, this guide is far from a complete archaeological, historical, cultural and/or practical guidebook to Armenia."  Surely if the facts alleged are true then are additional significant sources to be found.  Assuming editors are capable of working politely and cooperatively with each other, the replacement of less reliable and/or biased sources with more reliable and/or unbiased sources happens all the time without controversy on hundreds of articles every day.  As an arbitration matter, while I can not speak for Paul, it seems that he found the evidence for edit warring persuasive but the evidence for personal attacks lacking; hence the editing restriction rather than a site ban.  If mere edit warring were enough for a site ban, you would be on the same bus out of town. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 21:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
279891 +++$+++ Thatcher131 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279889 +++$+++ 279890 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.175142240E09 +++$+++ And, as a p.s., I'm going to say that this kind of complaint is why you (collectively) are being restricted and\/or banned.  Your only reactions seem to be revert or complain.  There is a universe of other options, including [[WP:3O|third opinion]], [[WP:RFC|request for comment]], and mediation.  If you (collectively) don't figure out how to use these tools, you (collectively) are likely to spend the next 12 months either blocked for breaking your 1RR per week limit, or frustrated and angry, or both.  +++$+++ ::And, as a p.s., I'm going to say that this kind of complaint is why you (collectively) are being restricted and/or banned.  Your only reactions seem to be revert or complain.  There is a universe of other options, including [[WP:3O|third opinion]], [[WP:RFC|request for comment]], and mediation.  If you (collectively) don't figure out how to use these tools, you (collectively) are likely to spend the next 12 months either blocked for breaking your 1RR per week limit, or frustrated and angry, or both. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 21:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
279892 +++$+++ Dacy69 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279889 +++$+++ 279891 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.175145540E09 +++$+++ First of all, about edit - Eupator removed not only my edit but others. I have showed now on talkpage another neutral source to support my edit. But question is not about content but about behavior. As for learning of DR - I have filed 2 AMA requests, several times proposed mediation and 2 times third party opinion on various pages. I have not violated 1rr rule. I have not reverted anything on page [[Yerevan]] - just added information. I follow Arbcom desicion. The ultimate question is not about someone's ban. I don't  support much that idea. I left my comments and proposals on that on talkpage of Arbcom desicion[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FArmenia-Azerbaijan%2FProposed_decision&diff=118517428&oldid=118449354]-- +++$+++ :::First of all, about edit - Eupator removed not only my edit but others. I have showed now on talkpage another neutral source to support my edit. But question is not about content but about behavior. As for learning of DR - I have filed 2 AMA requests, several times proposed mediation and 2 times third party opinion on various pages. I have not violated 1rr rule. I have not reverted anything on page [[Yerevan]] - just added information. I follow Arbcom desicion. The ultimate question is not about someone's ban. I don't  support much that idea. I left my comments and proposals on that on talkpage of Arbcom desicion[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FArmenia-Azerbaijan%2FProposed_decision&diff=118517428&oldid=118449354]--[[User:Dacy69|Dacy69]] 22:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
279893 +++$+++ Eupator +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279889 +++$+++ 279892 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.175156820E09 +++$+++ You reverted because you had added that same exact line, word by word several times in the past. Don't bother distorting the truth. Knowing full well that there is no consensus for such pov wording and that it has been reverted in the past you still added that during ArbCom! That is essentially willful disturbance. You also know full well that as a result, eventually someone will add the same thing to the [[Baku]] article. Enough already. All NK articles including the main one say that both populations \"left\" during the war to their own countries. That's called neutrality! So what is the purpose of adding that to the Yerevan article other than a blatant act of provocation? Are there no Azeri articles that need improving? No missing articles that need to be created? --<big>'''  +++$+++ ::::You reverted because you had added that same exact line, word by word several times in the past. Don't bother distorting the truth. Knowing full well that there is no consensus for such pov wording and that it has been reverted in the past you still added that during ArbCom! That is essentially willful disturbance. You also know full well that as a result, eventually someone will add the same thing to the [[Baku]] article. Enough already. All NK articles including the main one say that both populations "left" during the war to their own countries. That's called neutrality! So what is the purpose of adding that to the Yerevan article other than a blatant act of provocation? Are there no Azeri articles that need improving? No missing articles that need to be created? --<big>''' [[User:Eupator|<font color=#00N510>Ευπάτωρ]] '''</font></big><sup><small>[[User_Talk:Eupator|<font color=#974423>Talk!!]]</sup></small> 01:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
279894 +++$+++ Dacy69 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279889 +++$+++ 279893 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.175157540E09 +++$+++ Provocation is done by such suers like Fadix and Artaxiad. Actually, some Azeri city pages has conflict-related text. So, I can't called it neutrality when one side is full of conflict-related information, and other is clean. Ganja, for example, has separate section about Armenian community. The line which I added is well-known fact and by no means is POV. On talkpage I presented additional evidence. Previously I stepped aside from Yerevan because of understanding with user Aivazovsky to work together on certain issues to reach compromise. That understanding is not in place any more because some users destroyed it. But I see no reason to continue this dispute here. We can resolve this issue thru mediation.-- +++$+++ :::::Provocation is done by such suers like Fadix and Artaxiad. Actually, some Azeri city pages has conflict-related text. So, I can't called it neutrality when one side is full of conflict-related information, and other is clean. Ganja, for example, has separate section about Armenian community. The line which I added is well-known fact and by no means is POV. On talkpage I presented additional evidence. Previously I stepped aside from Yerevan because of understanding with user Aivazovsky to work together on certain issues to reach compromise. That understanding is not in place any more because some users destroyed it. But I see no reason to continue this dispute here. We can resolve this issue thru mediation.--[[User:Dacy69|Dacy69]] 01:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
279895 +++$+++ Eupator +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279889 +++$+++ 279894 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.175162580E09 +++$+++ That kind of line of thinking and reasoning is exactly the cause of the arbitration and the atmosphere of a battle. --<big>'''  +++$+++ ::::::That kind of line of thinking and reasoning is exactly the cause of the arbitration and the atmosphere of a battle. --<big>''' [[User:Eupator|<font color=#00N510>Ευπάτωρ]] '''</font></big><sup><small>[[User_Talk:Eupator|<font color=#974423>Talk!!]]</sup></small> 03:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
279896 +++$+++ Dacy69 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279889 +++$+++ 279895 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.175199900E09 +++$+++ To work together with Aivazovsky? To resolve thru mediation? Indeed, for just one day yesterday you made 3 rv's. That was a reason we all are brought to arbitration.-- +++$+++ :::::::To work together with Aivazovsky? To resolve thru mediation? Indeed, for just one day yesterday you made 3 rv's. That was a reason we all are brought to arbitration.--[[User:Dacy69|Dacy69]] 13:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
279897 +++$+++ Eupator +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279889 +++$+++ 279896 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.175209980E09 +++$+++ You were essentially blackmailing him, \"if you don't do this I wont do that\" sort of way. You see Wikipedia as a battlefield instead of a knowledge repository. Prove me wrong! Stay away from non-Azeri related articles and I'll see that you're not just \"Adil Baguirov light\". When I say non-Azeri related articles I don't mean topics like Ganja or NK obviously. I was reverting your buddy Baguirov whom you still refuse to criticize. Why don't you point out that he made over a dozen revert with his disruptive rubbish? Anyway, we are on another users talk page if you haven't noticed so reply to me directly.--<big>'''  +++$+++ ::::::::You were essentially blackmailing him, "if you don't do this I wont do that" sort of way. You see Wikipedia as a battlefield instead of a knowledge repository. Prove me wrong! Stay away from non-Azeri related articles and I'll see that you're not just "Adil Baguirov light". When I say non-Azeri related articles I don't mean topics like Ganja or NK obviously. I was reverting your buddy Baguirov whom you still refuse to criticize. Why don't you point out that he made over a dozen revert with his disruptive rubbish? Anyway, we are on another users talk page if you haven't noticed so reply to me directly.--<big>''' [[User:Eupator|<font color=#00N510>Ευπάτωρ]] '''</font></big><sup><small>[[User_Talk:Eupator|<font color=#974423>Talk!!]]</sup></small> 16:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
279898 +++$+++ Grandmaster +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279889 +++$+++ 279897 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.175217540E09 +++$+++ Eupator, from what I see you guard the Armenia related articles from information about Azerbaijani people. It is true about the article about [[Yerevan]]. At the same time, there\u2019s no problem with adding info about Armenians to the articles such as [[Nakhichevan]] or [[Ganja]]. I think it should be ok to provide such info, of course when it is based on reliable sources.  +++$+++ ::::::::: Eupator, from what I see you guard the Armenia related articles from information about Azerbaijani people. It is true about the article about [[Yerevan]]. At the same time, there’s no problem with adding info about Armenians to the articles such as [[Nakhichevan]] or [[Ganja]]. I think it should be ok to provide such info, of course when it is based on reliable sources. [[User:Grandmaster|Grandmaster]] 18:19, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

17747 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-28 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.293540360E09 +++$+++ Bet no one else has that one on their watch list :) - so leaving message like that is fine - and I accept your point - will search around for the appropriate ref -  btw you interested? http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Meetup\/Perth\/6   +++$+++ Bet no one else has that one on their watch list :) - so leaving message like that is fine - and I accept your point - will search around for the appropriate ref -  btw you interested? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/6  [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 04:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
17748 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17747 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.294175340E09 +++$+++ dead links - I know of a ''full field'' of them within the Australian project - must tell you about em later, at the little creatures :) - I must say I like their website - that has a certain - fremantle feel to its visual impact   +++$+++ ::dead links - I know of a ''full field'' of them within the Australian project - must tell you about em later, at the little creatures :) - I must say I like their website - that has a certain - fremantle feel to its visual impact  [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 13:09, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
17749 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17747 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-15 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.295120520E09 +++$+++ Unless I am mistaken - we missed you - trust all is ok - there will be more meetups during the year :)   +++$+++ ::Unless I am mistaken - we missed you - trust all is ok - there will be more meetups during the year :)  [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 11:42, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
17750 +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17747 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-15 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.295123940E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that. Minor crisis occurred at the last minute, but it's all sorted now. I'll try again next time.  +++$+++ :::Sorry about that. Minor crisis occurred at the last minute, but it's all sorted now. I'll try again next time. [[User:Mitch Ames|Mitch Ames]] ([[User talk:Mitch Ames#top|talk]]) 12:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
17751 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17747 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-16 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.295195340E09 +++$+++ Actually come to think of it - I had one as well - but somehow got there (thats a long story over a OJ\/whatever\/beer at a meetup I'd say) - and am very impressed by your work on Freo - thanks for that - from the meeting we have a potential Freo area article project coming up! - cheers  +++$+++ :::Actually come to think of it - I had one as well - but somehow got there (thats a long story over a OJ/whatever/beer at a meetup I'd say) - and am very impressed by your work on Freo - thanks for that - from the meeting we have a potential Freo area article project coming up! - cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 08:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

542039 +++$+++ Lradrama +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542039 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.193251380E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry to hear about your RfA. Just address the points that people left for you and I wish you the best of luck for next time. :-) <span style=\"font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans-serif\"> +++$+++ I'm sorry to hear about your RfA. Just address the points that people left for you and I wish you the best of luck for next time. :-) <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans-serif">[[User:Lradrama|<span style="color:red">Lra</span>]][[User talk:Lradrama|drama]]</span> 11:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
542040 +++$+++ Pedro +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542039 +++$+++ 542039 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.193253060E09 +++$+++ A future administrator I'm sure. If I can lend a hand in the future I'm always happy to help! <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :A future administrator I'm sure. If I can lend a hand in the future I'm always happy to help! <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Pedro|<b>Pedro</b>]] : [[User_talk:Pedro|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;Chat&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 12:11, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
542041 +++$+++ Useight +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542039 +++$+++ 542040 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.193265600E09 +++$+++ According to the other comments on your RFA, looks like you'll just have to slow down a bit and consentrate more on what you're doing.  And another read through [[WP:LOP|policies]] couldn't hurt.  I recommend waiting another couple of months and reapplying.  If you ever have any questions about anything, I'm always available on [[User talk:Useight|my talk page]].   +++$+++ ::According to the other comments on your RFA, looks like you'll just have to slow down a bit and consentrate more on what you're doing.  And another read through [[WP:LOP|policies]] couldn't hurt.  I recommend waiting another couple of months and reapplying.  If you ever have any questions about anything, I'm always available on [[User talk:Useight|my talk page]].  [[User:Useight|Useight]] 15:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

445772 +++$+++ Wiki Raja +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.311242580E09 +++$+++ How come my user talkpage is not hyperlinked in my signature?  +++$+++ How come my user talkpage is not hyperlinked in my signature? [[User:Wiki Raja|<span style="background:DarkRed;color:yellow;padding:2px 7px 4px 0px;text-shadow:white 0.110em 0.110em 0.110em;">—'''Wiki Raja'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Wiki Raja|<font color="black"> த </font>]]</sup> 03:03, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
445773 +++$+++ Wiki Raja +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ 445772 +++$+++ 445772 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311242640E09 +++$+++ Nevermind, I just found it out. Regards.  +++$+++ :Nevermind, I just found it out. Regards. [[User:Wiki Raja|<span style="background:DarkRed;color:yellow;padding:2px 7px 4px 0px;text-shadow:white 0.110em 0.110em 0.110em;">—'''Wiki Raja'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Wiki Raja|<font color="black"> த </font>]]</sup> 03:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

279899 +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279899 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-29 08:15:00 +++$+++ 1.175181300E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. I suppose you have no time to follow what happens at the [[WP:WPM|mathematics WikiProject]], but we have set up a process to grant articles that deserve it an A-class rating at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics\/A-class rating]]. Recently, our article on the [[Peano axioms]] was nominated. Unfortunately, there are no comments from anybody who really knows logic, so I was hoping that you could have a look at the article, see whether there is anything there that would embarrass us, and leave a comment on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics\/A-class rating\/Peano axioms]]. Thanks, and also many thanks for the thankless work on the Arbitration Committee. --  +++$+++ Hi Paul. I suppose you have no time to follow what happens at the [[WP:WPM|mathematics WikiProject]], but we have set up a process to grant articles that deserve it an A-class rating at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/A-class rating]]. Recently, our article on the [[Peano axioms]] was nominated. Unfortunately, there are no comments from anybody who really knows logic, so I was hoping that you could have a look at the article, see whether there is anything there that would embarrass us, and leave a comment on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/A-class rating/Peano axioms]]. Thanks, and also many thanks for the thankless work on the Arbitration Committee. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] ([[User talk:Jitse Niesen|talk]]) 08:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
279900 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279899 +++$+++ 279899 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.175215860E09 +++$+++ Always nice to hear from you. I have begun to dread  the yellow \"You have new messages\" banner &mdash; cast your gaze above, except for KSmrq's \"Joke time\", little to look forward to &mdash; so your's was a pleasant surprise.  Regards.  +++$+++ :Always nice to hear from you. I have begun to dread  the yellow "You have new messages" banner &mdash; cast your gaze above, except for KSmrq's "Joke time", little to look forward to &mdash; so your's was a pleasant surprise.  Regards. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

17756 +++$+++ Acabashi +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-14 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.308097440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help on Dennis Elwell. I suggested in my [[Talk:Dennis Elwell (astrologer)#Copyedit|preamble to the copyedit]] the keeping of the copyedit temp on the article so that it is flagged to be reviewed again during the coming [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors]] drive, bar it being reviewed by two copy editors already contacted. Given the history of the article I believe it could well become a war zone again.  +++$+++ Thanks for your help on Dennis Elwell. I suggested in my [[Talk:Dennis Elwell (astrologer)#Copyedit|preamble to the copyedit]] the keeping of the copyedit temp on the article so that it is flagged to be reviewed again during the coming [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors]] drive, bar it being reviewed by two copy editors already contacted. Given the history of the article I believe it could well become a war zone again. [[User:Acabashi|Acabashi]] ([[User talk:Acabashi|talk]]) 17:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
17757 +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17756 +++$+++ 17756 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.308156600E09 +++$+++ OK. I've [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Dennis_Elwell_%28astrologer%29&diff=434383165&oldid=434241798 restored the tag].  +++$+++ : OK. I've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dennis_Elwell_%28astrologer%29&diff=434383165&oldid=434241798 restored the tag]. [[User:Mitch Ames|Mitch Ames]] ([[User talk:Mitch Ames#top|talk]]) 09:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
17758 +++$+++ Acabashi +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17756 +++$+++ 17757 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.308163740E09 +++$+++ Many thanks sir. As I say, if you see anything else that needs a clean-up, break a leg :)  +++$+++ ::Many thanks sir. As I say, if you see anything else that needs a clean-up, break a leg :) [[User:Acabashi|Acabashi]] ([[User talk:Acabashi|talk]]) 11:49, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

279901 +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279901 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-30 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.175283600E09 +++$+++ Just kidding. I'm of course mightily disappointed that you don't know everything about Peano axioms and will need a good glass of whisky tonight to get over it. Somehow, I forgot to ask Trovatore; I'll do this right now. But you must be very tired when you start writing ''your's'' with an apostrophe. I do hope you have an army of shrinks on-site to combat any burn-out symptoms. --  +++$+++ Just kidding. I'm of course mightily disappointed that you don't know everything about Peano axioms and will need a good glass of whisky tonight to get over it. Somehow, I forgot to ask Trovatore; I'll do this right now. But you must be very tired when you start writing ''your's'' with an apostrophe. I do hope you have an army of shrinks on-site to combat any burn-out symptoms. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] ([[User talk:Jitse Niesen|talk]]) 12:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
279902 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279901 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.175299020E09 +++$+++ Shrikns? What burnedout syptuims? Ummm whixky! Piano axioms? You must mean Tuner's Axiom: ''You can tune a piano but you can't tune a fish''.  +++$+++ ::Shrikns? What burnedout syptuims? Ummm whixky! Piano axioms? You must mean Tuner's Axiom: ''You can tune a piano but you can't tune a fish''. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

17759 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17759 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.308477600E09 +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincluded-->  +++$+++ If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincluded--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 03:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
17760 +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17759 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-19 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.308478380E09 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot is confused. Details at [[User_talk:Coren#David_Forrest_.28Australian_politician.29]].  +++$+++ :: CorenSearchBot is confused. Details at [[User_talk:Coren#David_Forrest_.28Australian_politician.29]]. [[User:Mitch Ames|Mitch Ames]] ([[User talk:Mitch Ames#top|talk]]) 03:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

542048 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-28 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.193628900E09 +++$+++ I have no clue what I am doing I just found your page can you help me?  +++$+++ I have no clue what I am doing I just found your page can you help me? [[User:BabyGreeneyez23]] 20:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
542049 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542048 +++$+++ 542048 +++$+++ 2007-10-28 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.193628900E09 +++$+++ Lol that was the wrong question to ask everything i am so confused roght now its not even funny.  +++$+++ :Lol that was the wrong question to ask everything i am so confused roght now its not even funny. [[User:BabyGreeneyez23]] 20:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

17761 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-07 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310068800E09 +++$+++ Ta - there is a lot more that can go in that one - the epra and their reports etc were in fact latecomers to all the stuff - cheers  +++$+++ Ta - there is a lot more that can go in that one - the epra and their reports etc were in fact latecomers to all the stuff - cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 13:00, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
17762 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17761 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.310068920E09 +++$+++ stuffed as to how to get ref\/note 12 to start at the beginning and not half way cross the space  +++$+++ ::stuffed as to how to get ref/note 12 to start at the beginning and not half way cross the space [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 13:02, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

17763 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311361260E09 +++$+++ apols - it was a bit rude of my edit summaries to speak like that.. septimus schmeptimus I say - they sure had large families in those days  +++$+++ apols - it was a bit rude of my edit summaries to speak like that.. septimus schmeptimus I say - they sure had large families in those days [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
17764 +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17763 +++$+++ 17763 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311362340E09 +++$+++ No problems, I probably should have put the {{tl|Underconstruction}} up sooner. I was considering adding an article on [http:\/\/adb.anu.edu.au\/biography\/burt-octavius-5644 Octavius] as well, but he doesn't appear to be sufficiently [[WP:N|notable]]. Erickson's [[Dictionary of Western Australians]] mentions him, but that's about all I could find, other than his mention in Septimus' bio at ADB.  +++$+++ :No problems, I probably should have put the {{tl|Underconstruction}} up sooner. I was considering adding an article on [http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/burt-octavius-5644 Octavius] as well, but he doesn't appear to be sufficiently [[WP:N|notable]]. Erickson's [[Dictionary of Western Australians]] mentions him, but that's about all I could find, other than his mention in Septimus' bio at ADB. [[User:Mitch Ames|Mitch Ames]] ([[User talk:Mitch Ames#top|talk]]) 12:19, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
17765 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17763 +++$+++ 17764 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311362700E09 +++$+++ Maybe there's safety in numbers - one of my research sites os had guys who had fathered up to 80 kids, wheesh that sounds ridivisulous, or words to that affect  +++$+++ ::Maybe there's safety in numbers - one of my research sites os had guys who had fathered up to 80 kids, wheesh that sounds ridivisulous, or words to that affect [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:25, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
17766 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17763 +++$+++ 17764 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.311534720E09 +++$+++ nothing personal but what the hell is the aversion to [[WP:cite]] ? adding list of long lots of WP:RS at the bottom of an article is fine - but when there are no cites in the text - the long lists of refs really should be linked in... maybe this will read really bad - the intention is WP:AGF - but hell, there are dumbos out there who would tag the inevitable ''refs but no inline cites'' tag.. cheers - keep up the hard work anyways  +++$+++ ::nothing personal but what the hell is the aversion to [[WP:cite]] ? adding list of long lots of WP:RS at the bottom of an article is fine - but when there are no cites in the text - the long lists of refs really should be linked in... maybe this will read really bad - the intention is WP:AGF - but hell, there are dumbos out there who would tag the inevitable ''refs but no inline cites'' tag.. cheers - keep up the hard work anyways [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
17767 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17763 +++$+++ 17766 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311535500E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_Horgan_(Australian_politician) - is the classic case - not a cite in sight (arrgghhh) - now that trove even gives wp cite format as a given from newspapers it is a breeze  +++$+++ :::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Horgan_(Australian_politician) - is the classic case - not a cite in sight (arrgghhh) - now that trove even gives wp cite format as a given from newspapers it is a breeze [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:25, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
17768 +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17763 +++$+++ 17767 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.311536700E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=John_Horgan_%28Australian_politician%29&diff=441164946&oldid=441159398 Just for you] ...  +++$+++ ::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Horgan_%28Australian_politician%29&diff=441164946&oldid=441159398 Just for you] ... [[User:Mitch Ames|Mitch Ames]] ([[User talk:Mitch Ames#top|talk]]) 12:45, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
17769 +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17763 +++$+++ 17766 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311535680E09 +++$+++ Can I suggest that we wait until after I have removed the {{tl|Under construction}} tag, and then - if you still feel the need - continue the discussion about refs and cites. I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Septimus_Burt&diff=441108677&oldid=440974598 added] {{tl|More footnotes}} myself, with this comment ''<nowiki><!--This is a temporary reminder to myself to add inline cites where appropriate before I finish. Mitch Ames, 2011-07-24--><\/nowiki>''. I've nearly finished cleaning up, and will remove both (under construction, more footnotes) when I'm done. (The reason that I'm adding the inline cites last is because I find it easier to add them after I've got the bulk of the text done. The {{tl|Under construction}} is supposed to buy me a little time...  +++$+++ :::Can I suggest that we wait until after I have removed the {{tl|Under construction}} tag, and then - if you still feel the need - continue the discussion about refs and cites. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Septimus_Burt&diff=441108677&oldid=440974598 added] {{tl|More footnotes}} myself, with this comment ''<nowiki><!--This is a temporary reminder to myself to add inline cites where appropriate before I finish. Mitch Ames, 2011-07-24--></nowiki>''. I've nearly finished cleaning up, and will remove both (under construction, more footnotes) when I'm done. (The reason that I'm adding the inline cites last is because I find it easier to add them after I've got the bulk of the text done. The {{tl|Under construction}} is supposed to buy me a little time... [[User:Mitch Ames|Mitch Ames]] ([[User talk:Mitch Ames#top|talk]]) 12:28, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
17770 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17763 +++$+++ 17769 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.311535860E09 +++$+++ fairrr enough - remind me if ''you ever get to a meetup'' I owe you some rounds of whatever as recompense... thanks for the explanation..  +++$+++ ::::fairrr enough - remind me if ''you ever get to a meetup'' I owe you some rounds of whatever as recompense... thanks for the explanation.. [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

279908 +++$+++ Penwhale +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-02 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.175561400E09 +++$+++ Re: InShaneee, do you want me to go ahead and close it now, even though CM hasn't reviewed? -  +++$+++ Re: InShaneee, do you want me to go ahead and close it now, even though CM hasn't reviewed? - [[User:Penwhale|Penwhale]] &#124; <sup>[[User_talk:Penwhale|Blast him]] / [[Special:Contributions/Penwhale|Follow his steps]]</sup> 17:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
279909 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279908 +++$+++ 279908 +++$+++ 2007-04-02 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.175561820E09 +++$+++ You can wait for a response to your message on CM's talk page, or go ahead and close it now, either is fine with me.  +++$+++ :You can wait for a response to your message on CM's talk page, or go ahead and close it now, either is fine with me. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

542053 +++$+++ Qst +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-29 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.193689080E09 +++$+++ Hey, I was just wondering if you could give me some information about creating new accounts at the request of anonymous users at [[WP:ACC]]. I went to create a requested one, and it would not allow it to be created, because no password was specified, can you give me hand on how to do it, please. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hey, I was just wondering if you could give me some information about creating new accounts at the request of anonymous users at [[WP:ACC]]. I went to create a requested one, and it would not allow it to be created, because no password was specified, can you give me hand on how to do it, please. Thanks, [[User:Qst|<font color="2A8B31">'''Qst'''</font>]] 13:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
542054 +++$+++ Qst +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542053 +++$+++ 542053 +++$+++ 2007-10-29 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.193694480E09 +++$+++ So, if you created it with a password of ''wikimedia'', would you then email then telling them that and informing them it would be best to change it?  +++$+++ : So, if you created it with a password of ''wikimedia'', would you then email then telling them that and informing them it would be best to change it? [[User:Qst|<font color="2A8B31">'''Qst'''</font>]] 14:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

533063 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533063 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-17 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.203289620E09 +++$+++ Hello Tone. I don't think that full protection to this article is necessary. Edit warring is not that worrisome yet. And we do need editors to make changes to this article regarding Kosovo's declaration of independence. Regards, <strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ Hello Tone. I don't think that full protection to this article is necessary. Edit warring is not that worrisome yet. And we do need editors to make changes to this article regarding Kosovo's declaration of independence. Regards, <strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 15:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
533064 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533063 +++$+++ 533063 +++$+++ 2008-02-17 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.203289800E09 +++$+++ Ok, but I will still semi-protect it. Let's see how it develops... But you are right, updates are needed. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, but I will still semi-protect it. Let's see how it develops... But you are right, updates are needed. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
533065 +++$+++ Abc30 +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533063 +++$+++ 533064 +++$+++ 2008-02-17 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.203291420E09 +++$+++ It hasn't stayed stable. It is clear that full protection is required.  +++$+++ :: It hasn't stayed stable. It is clear that full protection is required. [[User:Abc30|Abc30]] ([[User talk:Abc30|talk]]) 15:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
533066 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533063 +++$+++ 533065 +++$+++ 2008-02-17 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.203291540E09 +++$+++ I'll let another admin protect it. Though I see a full protection is in place, I don't want to change the protection status for the third time again. --''' +++$+++ ::: I'll let another admin protect it. Though I see a full protection is in place, I don't want to change the protection status for the third time again. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

279915 +++$+++ ryanpostlethwaite +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279915 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.176352140E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul, I think you've got your wires crossed with what Newyorkbrad said. If you reread over [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Betacommand\/Workshop&diff=120305501&oldid=120304383 the diff], you'll see that Brad wasn't telling Thatcher to get lost, he was saying that he was going to group all his comments together as he didn't want his comments to '''get lost''' all over the arbitration page. Think you might have misread it :-)  +++$+++ Hi Paul, I think you've got your wires crossed with what Newyorkbrad said. If you reread over [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Betacommand/Workshop&diff=120305501&oldid=120304383 the diff], you'll see that Brad wasn't telling Thatcher to get lost, he was saying that he was going to group all his comments together as he didn't want his comments to '''get lost''' all over the arbitration page. Think you might have misread it :-) [[User:ryanpostlethwaite|Ryanpostlethwaite]] [[Special:Contributions/ryanpostlethwaite|contribs]]/[[User talk:ryanpostlethwaite|talk]] 21:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
279916 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279915 +++$+++ 279915 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.176352320E09 +++$+++ Apparently the  art of satire isn't what it used to be. I was just having a bit of fun ;-) but don't tell Brad.  +++$+++ :Apparently the  art of satire isn't what it used to be. I was just having a bit of fun ;-) but don't tell Brad. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
279917 +++$+++ ryanpostlethwaite +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279915 +++$+++ 279916 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.176352440E09 +++$+++ Right!! Let's just say I was a bit shocked when I read it! I guess that'll teach me to butt into other peoples talk pages :) sorry!  +++$+++ ::Right!! Let's just say I was a bit shocked when I read it! I guess that'll teach me to butt into other peoples talk pages :) sorry! [[User:ryanpostlethwaite|Ryanpostlethwaite]] [[Special:Contributions/ryanpostlethwaite|contribs]]/[[User talk:ryanpostlethwaite|talk]] 21:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
279918 +++$+++ ElinorD +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279915 +++$+++ 279917 +++$+++ 2007-04-11 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.176352740E09 +++$+++ Er, um, me too.  +++$+++ :::Er, um, me too. [[User:ElinorD|ElinorD]] [[User talk:ElinorD|(talk)]] 21:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
279919 +++$+++ Daniel.Bryant +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279915 +++$+++ 279918 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.176492240E09 +++$+++ ... I ''think'' I get it now ... ''' +++$+++ ::::... I ''think'' I get it now ... '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel&nbsp;Bryant</span>]]''' 12:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

17772 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311628740E09 +++$+++ these exist for a reason :) - cheers  +++$+++ these exist for a reason :) - cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 14:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
17773 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17772 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311707160E09 +++$+++ sort of format common sense more than anything else - Notes are things tied into the cite\/footnote pattern, while references are those things that have not been used for a cite - I have not wandered into MOS for a few years, and have not been stopped in my tracks until you have mentioned it - it all feels like wee need a meetup to have a beer\/coffee\/juice over this and  some other issues that seem to creep in after dealing with damned 19th century western australian dmned controlling families  +++$+++ ::sort of format common sense more than anything else - Notes are things tied into the cite/footnote pattern, while references are those things that have not been used for a cite - I have not wandered into MOS for a few years, and have not been stopped in my tracks until you have mentioned it - it all feels like wee need a meetup to have a beer/coffee/juice over this and  some other issues that seem to creep in after dealing with damned 19th century western australian dmned controlling families [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 12:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

17774 +++$+++ GenericBob +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.312572300E09 +++$+++ Hi Mitch, note that the logo image actually has \"2006\" in the bottom right (although the resolution makes it hard to read) - with that in mind, does it still need renaming? Cheers -- +++$+++ Hi Mitch, note that the logo image actually has "2006" in the bottom right (although the resolution makes it hard to read) - with that in mind, does it still need renaming? Cheers --[[User:GenericBob|GenericBob]] ([[User talk:GenericBob|talk]]) 12:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
17775 +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17774 +++$+++ 17774 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.312572600E09 +++$+++ Are you sure you're looking at the new 2011 version, that I uploaded today? (It has the text \"Census abs.gov.au\/census For a brighter future\" on it).  +++$+++ :Are you sure you're looking at the new 2011 version, that I uploaded today? (It has the text "Census abs.gov.au/census For a brighter future" on it). [[User:Mitch Ames|Mitch Ames]] ([[User talk:Mitch Ames#top|talk]]) 12:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
17776 +++$+++ GenericBob +++$+++ Mitch Ames +++$+++ 17774 +++$+++ 17775 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.312618740E09 +++$+++ Hmm. Maybe I still had the old one cached? Looks good now, anyway! -- +++$+++ ::Hmm. Maybe I still had the old one cached? Looks good now, anyway! --[[User:GenericBob|GenericBob]] ([[User talk:GenericBob|talk]]) 01:19, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

17777 +++$+++ Michael Glass +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-04 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.304546400E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you object to heights in metres rather than centimetres. It's just a small point, but it's good practice to avoid centimetres where possible. You may be interested in this [http:\/\/www.metricationmatters.com\/docs\/centimetresORmillimetres.pdf discussion paper]. Cheers,  +++$+++ I noticed that you object to heights in metres rather than centimetres. It's just a small point, but it's good practice to avoid centimetres where possible. You may be interested in this [http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/centimetresORmillimetres.pdf discussion paper]. Cheers, [[User:Michael Glass|Michael Glass]] ([[User talk:Michael Glass|talk]]) 15:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
17778 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17777 +++$+++ 17777 +++$+++ 2011-05-05 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.304619600E09 +++$+++ Thank you for sharing your opinion, Michael. I however am of a similar opinion to the websites from which you're taking these players' heights. While it may be different in the UK, Australia is more like Japan in that centimetres are the usual way to express human height.-- +++$+++ :Thank you for sharing your opinion, Michael. I however am of a similar opinion to the websites from which you're taking these players' heights. While it may be different in the UK, Australia is more like Japan in that centimetres are the usual way to express human height.--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] ([[User talk:Jeff79#top|talk]]) 11:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
17779 +++$+++ Sticks66 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17777 +++$+++ 17777 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.306444680E09 +++$+++ Jeff. A long campaign, I recall. A victory, I see.-<small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Jeff. A long campaign, I recall. A victory, I see.-<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sticks66|<font style="color:black;background:white;">'''Sticks'''</font>]][[User talk:Sticks66|<font style="color:white;background:red;">'''66'''</font>]]</span></small> 14:18, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
17780 +++$+++ Shirt58 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17777 +++$+++ 17779 +++$+++ 2011-05-26 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.306447980E09 +++$+++ If you two boys and and all your friends can't play together without fighting, so help me, I '''will''' turn the garden hose on the lot of you! - -- +++$+++ ::If you two boys and and all your friends can't play together without fighting, so help me, I '''will''' turn the garden hose on the lot of you! - --[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58's mum]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 15:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
17781 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17777 +++$+++ 17780 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.306587240E09 +++$+++ Now to take care of the much more absurd and much longer-standing [[State of Origin]] situation.-- +++$+++ :::Now to take care of the much more absurd and much longer-standing [[State of Origin]] situation.--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] ([[User talk:Jeff79#top|talk]]) 05:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

279923 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.176929340E09 +++$+++ Hi Arcfrk. Sorry about that. I don't know Jheald, but although he could have chosen his words more carefully, I don't think he intended what he wrote to be insulting. I would try to overlook it if I were you. On a more positive note, I'm glad you pointed out that discussion to me, I found it quite interesting. Best regards,  +++$+++ Hi Arcfrk. Sorry about that. I don't know Jheald, but although he could have chosen his words more carefully, I don't think he intended what he wrote to be insulting. I would try to overlook it if I were you. On a more positive note, I'm glad you pointed out that discussion to me, I found it quite interesting. Best regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
279924 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279923 +++$+++ 279923 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.176934140E09 +++$+++ It appears [[User:Jheald|Jheald]] has reconsidered, and replaced the original language with something gentler. If all our conflicts were so pleasantly resolved, we could disband the arbitration committee. <tt>:-)<\/tt>. -- +++$+++ : It appears [[User:Jheald|Jheald]] has reconsidered, and replaced the original language with something gentler. If all our conflicts were so pleasantly resolved, we could disband the arbitration committee. <tt>:-)</tt>. --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 15:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
279925 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279923 +++$+++ 279924 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.176934680E09 +++$+++ If only \u2026 I am counting the days till my sentence is over. Is it time yet for another joke?  +++$+++ ::If only … I am counting the days till my sentence is over. Is it time yet for another joke? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
279926 +++$+++ Arcfrk +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279923 +++$+++ 279923 +++$+++ 2007-04-18 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.176965460E09 +++$+++ Right! Thank you for your advise. Regards,  +++$+++ : Right! Thank you for your advise. Regards, [[User:Arcfrk|Arcfrk]] 23:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

542069 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-02 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.194054600E09 +++$+++ How you came up with [[User:Dreamafter\/Mediation\/Answer|this]]? Thanks. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ How you came up with [[User:Dreamafter/Mediation/Answer|this]]? Thanks. <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">303</span>]]''</sub></font> 18:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
542070 +++$+++ Vintagekits +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542069 +++$+++ 542069 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.194054900E09 +++$+++ Exactly, its not my understanding.-- +++$+++ :Exactly, its not my understanding.--[[User:Vintagekits|Vintagekits]] 18:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
542071 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542069 +++$+++ 542070 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.194055020E09 +++$+++ I've read through the mediation. People made their initial arguments, and you said on Domer48's talk page discussion would take place based on those arguments. Where's the discussion based on that? There hasn't been any. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::I've read through the mediation. People made their initial arguments, and you said on Domer48's talk page discussion would take place based on those arguments. Where's the discussion based on that? There hasn't been any. <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">303</span>]]''</sub></font> 18:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
542072 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542069 +++$+++ 542071 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.194055500E09 +++$+++ Please show me where the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADomer48&diff=162225921&oldid=161987711 promised discussion] took place, none of those pages show any discussion after the date in question. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::Please show me where the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADomer48&diff=162225921&oldid=161987711 promised discussion] took place, none of those pages show any discussion after the date in question. <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">303</span>]]''</sub></font> 19:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
542073 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542069 +++$+++ 542072 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.194056640E09 +++$+++ Domer48 said [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADreamafter&diff=159346512&oldid=158848047 \"Are the arguments presented going to be discussed?\"] on 21 September. You said [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADomer48&diff=162225921&oldid=161987711 \"We will of course be having the discussion at length\"] on 4 October. Where is the subsequent discussion? <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::Domer48 said [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADreamafter&diff=159346512&oldid=158848047 "Are the arguments presented going to be discussed?"] on 21 September. You said [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADomer48&diff=162225921&oldid=161987711 "We will of course be having the discussion at length"] on 4 October. Where is the subsequent discussion? <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">303</span>]]''</sub></font> 19:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

17783 +++$+++ Sticks66 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17783 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-10 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.307740620E09 +++$+++ Mate, regarding the blue or maroon shading [[List of Australia national rugby league team players]] what do you reckon about the handful of old timers who were actually Kiwis ? Any thoughts ? -<small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Mate, regarding the blue or maroon shading [[List of Australia national rugby league team players]] what do you reckon about the handful of old timers who were actually Kiwis ? Any thoughts ? -<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sticks66|<font style="color:black;background:white;">'''Sticks'''</font>]][[User talk:Sticks66|<font style="color:white;background:red;">'''66'''</font>]]</span></small> 14:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
17784 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17783 +++$+++ 17783 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.307765700E09 +++$+++ Yeah, a pale grey would make sense. I've just been leaving them white so far. But perhaps white could be left for those who were neither Kiwis, nor Maroons nor Blues.-- +++$+++ :Yeah, a pale grey would make sense. I've just been leaving them white so far. But perhaps white could be left for those who were neither Kiwis, nor Maroons nor Blues.--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] ([[User talk:Jeff79#top|talk]]) 21:15, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

17785 +++$+++ Michael Glass +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17785 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-11 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.307809980E09 +++$+++ Sorry about the mistakes in editing. I'll do my best to fix them up and I don't expect you to do it. Please let me know - politely, if you can - if I miss any.  +++$+++ Sorry about the mistakes in editing. I'll do my best to fix them up and I don't expect you to do it. Please let me know - politely, if you can - if I miss any. [[User:Michael Glass|Michael Glass]] ([[User talk:Michael Glass|talk]]) 09:33, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
17786 +++$+++ Michael Glass +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17785 +++$+++ 17785 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.307810580E09 +++$+++ On going through some of your changes they seem mostly to turn 1.80m into 180cm. Is that your problem?  +++$+++ :On going through some of your changes they seem mostly to turn 1.80m into 180cm. Is that your problem? [[User:Michael Glass|Michael Glass]] ([[User talk:Michael Glass|talk]]) 09:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

17787 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17787 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-11 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.307791800E09 +++$+++ I can't find a single source for the Template:Huddersfield Giants Hall of Fame Inductees on the internet. Can you?-- +++$+++ I can't find a single source for the Template:Huddersfield Giants Hall of Fame Inductees on the internet. Can you?--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] ([[User talk:Jeff79|talk]]) 04:30, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
17788 +++$+++ DynamoDegsy +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17787 +++$+++ 17787 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.307817900E09 +++$+++ Hi Jeff79, I sourced the template from Page-6 of ''Fartowner - A Celebratory look at 25 years of Huddersfield Rugby League Club Players Association''  by David Gronow (grandson of [[Benjamin Gronow]]) & Mick Rhodes, the Hall of Fame is housed in the Galpharm Stadium. I've addded a quouted-out reference at the head of the template. Best Regards.  +++$+++ :Hi Jeff79, I sourced the template from Page-6 of ''Fartowner - A Celebratory look at 25 years of Huddersfield Rugby League Club Players Association''  by David Gronow (grandson of [[Benjamin Gronow]]) & Mick Rhodes, the Hall of Fame is housed in the Galpharm Stadium. I've addded a quouted-out reference at the head of the template. Best Regards. [[User:DynamoDegsy|DynamoDegsy]] ([[User talk:DynamoDegsy|talk]]) 11:45, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
17789 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17787 +++$+++ 17788 +++$+++ 2011-06-11 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.307818080E09 +++$+++ So it's from a book. Ok, no worries. I wonder why the club leaves it off their website. Wierd.-- +++$+++ ::So it's from a book. Ok, no worries. I wonder why the club leaves it off their website. Wierd.--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] ([[User talk:Jeff79#top|talk]]) 11:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

17790 +++$+++ Ginger Warrior +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-01 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309546440E09 +++$+++ I've never really cared much for [[WP:DYK|DYK]] but while updating [[Sam Tomkins]] I discovered he's the only debutant in the history of rugby league to score five tries in his first match. Surely worth a mention, do you think? <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #74068f; font-family=fantasy\"> +++$+++ I've never really cared much for [[WP:DYK|DYK]] but while updating [[Sam Tomkins]] I discovered he's the only debutant in the history of rugby league to score five tries in his first match. Surely worth a mention, do you think? <small><span style="border:1px solid #74068f; font-family=fantasy">[[User:Ginger Warrior|<font style="color:#74068f; background:black">GW</font>]][[User talk:Ginger Warrior|<font style="color:white; background:#74068f">(talk)</font>]]</span></small> 11:54, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
17791 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17790 +++$+++ 17790 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.309549560E09 +++$+++ Yeah, for sure. Go for it.-- +++$+++ :Yeah, for sure. Go for it.--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] ([[User talk:Jeff79#top|talk]]) 12:46, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

279935 +++$+++ Dr. Submillimeter +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-20 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.177076820E09 +++$+++ Hence, I removed the wikilinks in the references because they could cause confusion.  Does this make sense?  (I hope by capital letters were not too loud.)   +++$+++ Hence, I removed the wikilinks in the references because they could cause confusion.  Does this make sense?  (I hope by capital letters were not too loud.)  [[User:Dr. Submillimeter|Dr. Submillimeter]] 06:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
279936 +++$+++ Dr. Submillimeter +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279935 +++$+++ 279935 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.177096500E09 +++$+++ [[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]] pointed out that my corrections go against the recommendations at [[WP:CITET]] on using references.  Feel free to replace the links.  (Just leave the categories alone.)   +++$+++ :[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]] pointed out that my corrections go against the recommendations at [[WP:CITET]] on using references.  Feel free to replace the links.  (Just leave the categories alone.)  [[User:Dr. Submillimeter|Dr. Submillimeter]] 12:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
279937 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279935 +++$+++ 279936 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.177120500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for respondoing to my post on your talk page. KSmrq has already replaced the links in that article. Are there other edits that need to be undone? Regards,  +++$+++ ::Thanks for respondoing to my post on your talk page. KSmrq has already replaced the links in that article. Are there other edits that need to be undone? Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

17792 +++$+++ The Other Saluton +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.310157480E09 +++$+++ Why would anyone need a two-line disambig [[John Buttigieg]] if there is a four-line [[Buttigieg]]?  +++$+++ Why would anyone need a two-line disambig [[John Buttigieg]] if there is a four-line [[Buttigieg]]? [[User:The Other Saluton|The Other Saluton]] ([[User talk:The Other Saluton|talk]]) 13:38, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
17793 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17792 +++$+++ 17792 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.310186340E09 +++$+++ Because clearly, if someone types \"John Buttigieg\" they are not looking for \"Buttigieg\". Otherwise why did they type 'John'?-- +++$+++ :Because clearly, if someone types "John Buttigieg" they are not looking for "Buttigieg". Otherwise why did they type 'John'?--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] ([[User talk:Jeff79#top|talk]]) 21:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
17794 +++$+++ The Other Saluton +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17792 +++$+++ 17793 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.310210460E09 +++$+++ They can easily find both Johns in [[Buttigieg]]. An extra link from [[Buttigieg]] to [[John Buttigieg]] is by no means necessary. It just hampers the way to articles.  +++$+++ ::They can easily find both Johns in [[Buttigieg]]. An extra link from [[Buttigieg]] to [[John Buttigieg]] is by no means necessary. It just hampers the way to articles. [[User:The Other Saluton|The Other Saluton]] ([[User talk:The Other Saluton|talk]]) 04:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

542082 +++$+++ Rebelyell2006 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-03 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.194151200E09 +++$+++ Have you ever heard of humor?  +++$+++ Have you ever heard of humor? [[User:Rebelyell2006|Rebelyell2006]] 21:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
542083 +++$+++ Rebelyell2006 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542082 +++$+++ 542082 +++$+++ 2007-11-03 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.194152400E09 +++$+++ They have a tag for everything...  +++$+++ :They have a tag for everything... [[User:Rebelyell2006|Rebelyell2006]] 22:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

17795 +++$+++ Flyer22 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17795 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311636060E09 +++$+++ Hello, Jeff79. Would you weigh in on the above linked discussion regarding an edit you made?  +++$+++ Hello, Jeff79. Would you weigh in on the above linked discussion regarding an edit you made? [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 16:21, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
17796 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17795 +++$+++ 17795 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.311700800E09 +++$+++ I'm not trying to make \"your\" article worse. See [[WP:VERIFIABILITY]].-- +++$+++ :I'm not trying to make "your" article worse. See [[WP:VERIFIABILITY]].--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] ([[User talk:Jeff79#top|talk]]) 10:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
17797 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17795 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311752940E09 +++$+++ Ummmm, not sure what else to say but, see [[WP:VERIFIABILITY]].-- +++$+++ :::Ummmm, not sure what else to say but, see [[WP:VERIFIABILITY]].--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] ([[User talk:Jeff79#top|talk]]) 00:49, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

527254 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-21 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.237675200E09 +++$+++ Take a look: {{tl|USMC-stub}} {{tl|USMC-bio-stub}}  ''' +++$+++ Take a look: {{tl|USMC-stub}} {{tl|USMC-bio-stub}}  '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  15:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
527255 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527254 +++$+++ 527254 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.237679340E09 +++$+++ Question 3: We could, but I'm not at all convinced that it would be worth doing. The current solution works perfectly fine, and I don't see any potential gain for the amount of tedious man-hours it would take to replace the current usage. Of course, if you know somebody who would be willing to program a bot, then I might make a template for it to use; but I would expect your help in fixing any false positives the bot mindlessly created. ''' +++$+++ :Question 3: We could, but I'm not at all convinced that it would be worth doing. The current solution works perfectly fine, and I don't see any potential gain for the amount of tedious man-hours it would take to replace the current usage. Of course, if you know somebody who would be willing to program a bot, then I might make a template for it to use; but I would expect your help in fixing any false positives the bot mindlessly created. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  16:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
527256 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527254 +++$+++ 527255 +++$+++ 2009-03-21 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.237688460E09 +++$+++ Well, sure, that seems like a good shortcut. But you've demonstrated sufficient knowledge of templates that you don't need my help with that. :P Just keep in mind that {{tl|USMCportal}} is already in use, you'd have to find a different name. ''' +++$+++ ::Well, sure, that seems like a good shortcut. But you've demonstrated sufficient knowledge of templates that you don't need my help with that. :P Just keep in mind that {{tl|USMCportal}} is already in use, you'd have to find a different name. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  19:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
527257 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527254 +++$+++ 527256 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.237735560E09 +++$+++ I'm suprised, this is as simple as a template could get. Anyway, take a look at {{tl|USMCportallink}}. ''' +++$+++ :::I'm suprised, this is as simple as a template could get. Anyway, take a look at {{tl|USMCportallink}}. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  08:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
527258 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527254 +++$+++ 527257 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.237752600E09 +++$+++ The administrative junk has been resolved. If I missed anything, let me know. I also forgot to note earlier that {{tl|US Marine Corps navbox}} also links to the portal; it won't be necessary to duplicate this unless you really desire to have it under the \"See also\" section of an article. ''' +++$+++ ::::The administrative junk has been resolved. If I missed anything, let me know. I also forgot to note earlier that {{tl|US Marine Corps navbox}} also links to the portal; it won't be necessary to duplicate this unless you really desire to have it under the "See also" section of an article. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  13:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

17799 +++$+++ Sticks66 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17799 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312492860E09 +++$+++ Hi Jeff, for the Test team line-ups on that 1910 GB RL tour of Australia article, you might want to consider the horizontal small font team lineups like we've use on the [[1957\u201358 Australia rugby union tour of Britain, Ireland and France|Wallaby tour articles]]. Always handy when there are a number of Tests and line-ups to fit into a tour article and fits well if you're putting in any match reports of individual Tests. Cheers -<small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Hi Jeff, for the Test team line-ups on that 1910 GB RL tour of Australia article, you might want to consider the horizontal small font team lineups like we've use on the [[1957–58 Australia rugby union tour of Britain, Ireland and France|Wallaby tour articles]]. Always handy when there are a number of Tests and line-ups to fit into a tour article and fits well if you're putting in any match reports of individual Tests. Cheers -<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sticks66|<font style="color:black;background:white;">'''Sticks'''</font>]][[User talk:Sticks66|<font style="color:white;background:red;">'''66'''</font>]]</span></small> 14:21, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
17800 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17799 +++$+++ 17799 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312576320E09 +++$+++ Hey. Yeah I went for something similar when I worked on [[2008 Rugby League World Cup matches]]. But I dunno, I guess I just like the way the vertical teams have players of a position lined up against one another for immediate comparison. Although I know what you mean, and I think they only really work [[2010_NRL_Grand_Final#Match_details|when they don't stretch past the text beside them]]. I guess I'm hoping that (unlikely as it is) that the old Kangaroo tour tests someday will be similarly filled with prose to fix that big, empty, white space issue.-- +++$+++ :Hey. Yeah I went for something similar when I worked on [[2008 Rugby League World Cup matches]]. But I dunno, I guess I just like the way the vertical teams have players of a position lined up against one another for immediate comparison. Although I know what you mean, and I think they only really work [[2010_NRL_Grand_Final#Match_details|when they don't stretch past the text beside them]]. I guess I'm hoping that (unlikely as it is) that the old Kangaroo tour tests someday will be similarly filled with prose to fix that big, empty, white space issue.--[[User:Jeff79|Jeff79]] ([[User talk:Jeff79#top|talk]]) 13:32, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
17801 +++$+++ Sticks66 +++$+++ Jeff79 +++$+++ 17799 +++$+++ 17800 +++$+++ 2011-08-06 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312667160E09 +++$+++ Well I know what you mean in terms of GFs. Nothing like a man-on-man lineup. That [[2010_NRL_Grand_Final#Match_details|2010 GF matchup]] does look impressive, but jeez if we're going to go back to every GF report for the seasons past and make them look as smooth as 2010 ......well that's a big job and something I thought we'd done & dusted in 2007! Cheers mate -<small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::Well I know what you mean in terms of GFs. Nothing like a man-on-man lineup. That [[2010_NRL_Grand_Final#Match_details|2010 GF matchup]] does look impressive, but jeez if we're going to go back to every GF report for the seasons past and make them look as smooth as 2010 ......well that's a big job and something I thought we'd done & dusted in 2007! Cheers mate -<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sticks66|<font style="color:black;background:white;">'''Sticks'''</font>]][[User talk:Sticks66|<font style="color:white;background:red;">'''66'''</font>]]</span></small> 14:46, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

279947 +++$+++ Asdfg12345 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-03 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.178244540E09 +++$+++ I was going to say something further, Paul, but I will just recommend you go to this page and read the report: www.organharvestinvestigation.net. I also want to say that there are enough respected third-party sources, not Falun Gong, which document large-scale systematic torture, like beatings with sticks, using fire, electricity, mangling womens' vaginas, people getting tied up in constrained positions for days, injected with drugs so they go blind or go crazy and lose the ability to talk, lose memory, get put in wheelchairs, whatever, any and all cruel things you can think of, all this is documented by sources that are not Falun Gong. Basically I am just writing the note out of concern that you are not fully aware of, or have not had the opportunity to read information about this. There is a psychiatrist Robin Munro who has written a bunch about psychiatric abuses, and the UN Special Rappeuteur for torture, Amnesty International, as well as other NGOS, all have a lot to say about the matter. Maybe you already heard about the organ harvesting report. I really hope you read it.--<font style=\"bold\"> +++$+++ I was going to say something further, Paul, but I will just recommend you go to this page and read the report: www.organharvestinvestigation.net. I also want to say that there are enough respected third-party sources, not Falun Gong, which document large-scale systematic torture, like beatings with sticks, using fire, electricity, mangling womens' vaginas, people getting tied up in constrained positions for days, injected with drugs so they go blind or go crazy and lose the ability to talk, lose memory, get put in wheelchairs, whatever, any and all cruel things you can think of, all this is documented by sources that are not Falun Gong. Basically I am just writing the note out of concern that you are not fully aware of, or have not had the opportunity to read information about this. There is a psychiatrist Robin Munro who has written a bunch about psychiatric abuses, and the UN Special Rappeuteur for torture, Amnesty International, as well as other NGOS, all have a lot to say about the matter. Maybe you already heard about the organ harvesting report. I really hope you read it.--<font style="bold">[[User:Asdfg12345|'''Asdfg''']]</font><font color="black" style="bold">[[User_talk:Asdfg12345|'''12345''']]</font> 19:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
279948 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279947 +++$+++ 279947 +++$+++ 2007-05-03 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.178247960E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your thoughts. Re-reading what I wrote above I realize that I didn't express myself very well. The image itself is not \"provacative\" or \"sensationalist\" but its ''use'' in that article ''may'' be.  +++$+++ :Thank you for your thoughts. Re-reading what I wrote above I realize that I didn't express myself very well. The image itself is not "provacative" or "sensationalist" but its ''use'' in that article ''may'' be. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
279949 +++$+++ HappyInGeneral +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279947 +++$+++ 279948 +++$+++ 2007-05-03 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.178251380E09 +++$+++ In which article do you think that it should be appropriate then? -- +++$+++ :: In which article do you think that it should be appropriate then? --[[User:HappyInGeneral|HappyInGeneral]] 21:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
279950 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279947 +++$+++ 279949 +++$+++ 2007-05-03 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.178252400E09 +++$+++ As I said above, that is for the editors of each article to decide through consensus &mdash; and in particular, ''without edit warring''.  +++$+++ :::As I said above, that is for the editors of each article to decide through consensus &mdash; and in particular, ''without edit warring''. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
279951 +++$+++ HappyInGeneral +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279947 +++$+++ 279950 +++$+++ 2007-05-03 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.178253000E09 +++$+++ I just got a reference to [[WP:DR]] from another administrator, so I'll go through that first. PS: it would have been nice to get this a month ago and before the 30+ reverts. Anyway thanks a lot for your input.  -- +++$+++ :::: I just got a reference to [[WP:DR]] from another administrator, so I'll go through that first. PS: it would have been nice to get this a month ago and before the 30+ reverts. Anyway thanks a lot for your input.  --[[User:HappyInGeneral|HappyInGeneral]] 21:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

17805 +++$+++ Kenshin +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17805 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-09 08:11:00 +++$+++ 1.270825860E09 +++$+++ Salut! Intradevar, originea lui Pann este incerta, dar faptul ca \"un singur grup\" sustine originea lui roma este irelevant, intrucat era de asteptat ca majoritarilor sa nu le placa ideea ca unul din oamenii importanti ai culturii romane se trage dintr-o familie de romi. Este eterna poveste. In fine, sint de acord ca categorisirea lui ar trebui sa tina cont de aceasta incertitudine, totusi \"Romani people and Romanipen in Romania\" este mai degraba pt \"entitati\" relevante pt romi, decat pt indivizi. Chiar nu stiu care ar fi cea mai buna solutie.  +++$+++ Salut! Intradevar, originea lui Pann este incerta, dar faptul ca "un singur grup" sustine originea lui roma este irelevant, intrucat era de asteptat ca majoritarilor sa nu le placa ideea ca unul din oamenii importanti ai culturii romane se trage dintr-o familie de romi. Este eterna poveste. In fine, sint de acord ca categorisirea lui ar trebui sa tina cont de aceasta incertitudine, totusi "Romani people and Romanipen in Romania" este mai degraba pt "entitati" relevante pt romi, decat pt indivizi. Chiar nu stiu care ar fi cea mai buna solutie. [[User:Kenshin|Kenshin]] ([[User talk:Kenshin|talk]]) 08:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
17806 +++$+++ Kenshin +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17805 +++$+++ 17805 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 08:16:00 +++$+++ 1.270826160E09 +++$+++ Nu chiar... in cartea \"Elite rome\", scrisa de 2 romani, este trecut si Anton Pann.  +++$+++ : Nu chiar... in cartea "Elite rome", scrisa de 2 romani, este trecut si Anton Pann. [[User:Kenshin|Kenshin]] ([[User talk:Kenshin|talk]]) 08:16, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

279952 +++$+++ Jd2718 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-05 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.178394240E09 +++$+++ for this [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Betacommand#Communication]]. Creating some semblance of balance, including both rights and responsibilities... well this patches a bit of a gap (beyond any immediate case).  +++$+++ for this [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Betacommand#Communication]]. Creating some semblance of balance, including both rights and responsibilities... well this patches a bit of a gap (beyond any immediate case). [[User:Jd2718|Jd2718]] 12:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
279953 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279952 +++$+++ 279952 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.178402040E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome. And I appreciate your thanks very much.  +++$+++ :You are very welcome. And I appreciate your thanks very much. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:54, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

17810 +++$+++ Iadrian yu +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17810 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-17 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.271565120E09 +++$+++ Salut, sper ca nu te deranjez daca vorbesc in Romana? Am citit despre Sarbi si am ajuns si aici, daca poti sa te uiti [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Serbs_in_Romania&action=historysubmit&diff=356666112&oldid=353523494 aici] te rog. Zice multe fara referinte, si sincer imi vine greu sa cred ca Sarbi au facut vreodata populatia majoritara in Timisoara. Multumesc.  +++$+++ Salut, sper ca nu te deranjez daca vorbesc in Romana? Am citit despre Sarbi si am ajuns si aici, daca poti sa te uiti [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Serbs_in_Romania&action=historysubmit&diff=356666112&oldid=353523494 aici] te rog. Zice multe fara referinte, si sincer imi vine greu sa cred ca Sarbi au facut vreodata populatia majoritara in Timisoara. Multumesc. [[User:Iadrian yu|iadrian]] ([[User talk:Iadrian yu|talk]]) 21:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
17811 +++$+++ Iadrian yu +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17810 +++$+++ 17810 +++$+++ 2010-04-18 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.271614500E09 +++$+++ Mersi pentru raspuns. Stiu ca Romani nu erau majoritari in Timisoara in anumite periode doar nu am auzit(vazut prin documentatie) niciodata ca Sarbi erau majoritari. Prin Timisoara Unguri si Germani in afara de Romani erau majoritari, dar de alta natiune nu stiu daca ar fii. Multumesc. Nui nici o graba, doar ca am dat peste asta si sunt putin curios pentru ca nu exista nici o data pentru faptul asta si stiu destul de bine istoria Sarbilor.  +++$+++ : Mersi pentru raspuns. Stiu ca Romani nu erau majoritari in Timisoara in anumite periode doar nu am auzit(vazut prin documentatie) niciodata ca Sarbi erau majoritari. Prin Timisoara Unguri si Germani in afara de Romani erau majoritari, dar de alta natiune nu stiu daca ar fii. Multumesc. Nui nici o graba, doar ca am dat peste asta si sunt putin curios pentru ca nu exista nici o data pentru faptul asta si stiu destul de bine istoria Sarbilor. [[User:Iadrian yu|iadrian]] ([[User talk:Iadrian yu|talk]]) 11:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

17813 +++$+++ CristianChirita +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17813 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-22 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.271991600E09 +++$+++ 2008 edition ISBN is right; the original is available at MNIR +++$+++ 2008 edition ISBN is right; the original is available at MNIR[[User:CristianChirita|CristianChirita]] ([[User talk:CristianChirita|talk]]) 20:00, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
17814 +++$+++ CristianChirita +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.272076440E09 +++$+++ I've bought the book two week ago, from Romanian National Hystory Museum, stil the date is 2008 ISBN 978-973-8966-70-3 and then another cod 355(398)\"0275\/0376\" 2008 Editor Dan iulian Margarit Claudiu Stan, my edition has 139 pages (140 if you consider that one is blank http:\/\/www.cetateadescaun.ro\/uploads\/products_files\/jjoRoh7k9I.pdf), and starting from page 116 is an abstract in english.So the quote was an exact transliteration and not a translation. +++$+++ :: I've bought the book two week ago, from Romanian National Hystory Museum, stil the date is 2008 ISBN 978-973-8966-70-3 and then another cod 355(398)"0275/0376" 2008 Editor Dan iulian Margarit Claudiu Stan, my edition has 139 pages (140 if you consider that one is blank http://www.cetateadescaun.ro/uploads/products_files/jjoRoh7k9I.pdf), and starting from page 116 is an abstract in english.So the quote was an exact transliteration and not a translation.[[User:CristianChirita|CristianChirita]] ([[User talk:CristianChirita|talk]]) 19:34, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

17817 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17817 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-06 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.273138320E09 +++$+++ (A fine new article, by the way.) Do drop in [http:\/\/ro.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discu\u0163ie_Utilizator:Biruitorul#For_Dahn at the other place] so I can talk without fear of reprisal. -  +++$+++ (A fine new article, by the way.) Do drop in [http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discuţie_Utilizator:Biruitorul#For_Dahn at the other place] so I can talk without fear of reprisal. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 02:32, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
17818 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17817 +++$+++ 17817 +++$+++ 2010-05-06 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.273168620E09 +++$+++ My head is still spinning from the latest developments, and I myself am quite ''dezumflat'' for now. You are totally right, and I will comment on your post there later today. I'm just leaving this note here so I don't have to sign in there for now - there's plenty other stuff waiting to jump out at me there -, but also so you don't think I'm ignoring you (after all, I was the one to pester you for a reply). Sursum corda.  +++$+++ :My head is still spinning from the latest developments, and I myself am quite ''dezumflat'' for now. You are totally right, and I will comment on your post there later today. I'm just leaving this note here so I don't have to sign in there for now - there's plenty other stuff waiting to jump out at me there -, but also so you don't think I'm ignoring you (after all, I was the one to pester you for a reply). Sursum corda. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn#top|talk]]) 10:57, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

90351 +++$+++ Cuñado +++$+++ Wiki-uk +++$+++ 90351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-25 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.235572560E09 +++$+++ Good work on all the stuff you're doing.  +++$+++ Good work on all the stuff you're doing. [[User:Cuñado|<font color="#AF7817">'''Cuñado'''</font>]] ☼ - [[User talk:Cuñado|<font size="-3">Talk</font>]] 06:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
90352 +++$+++ Wiki-uk +++$+++ Wiki-uk +++$+++ 90351 +++$+++ 90351 +++$+++ 2009-02-25 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.235573940E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Noted.  +++$+++ :Thanks! Noted. [[User:Wiki-uk|Wiki-uk]] ([[User talk:Wiki-uk#top|talk]]) 06:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
90353 +++$+++ Smkolins +++$+++ Wiki-uk +++$+++ 90351 +++$+++ 90352 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.247647620E09 +++$+++ since we're talking about the country article,  a couple thoughts; one is why re-add the cat? It messes with the logic of the page and it's in the See Also section now; and what do you think about [[User:Smkolins\/Sandbox3|this]].  +++$+++ ::since we're talking about the country article,  a couple thoughts; one is why re-add the cat? It messes with the logic of the page and it's in the See Also section now; and what do you think about [[User:Smkolins/Sandbox3|this]]. [[User:Smkolins|Smkolins]] ([[User talk:Smkolins|talk]]) 01:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
90354 +++$+++ Smkolins +++$+++ Wiki-uk +++$+++ 90351 +++$+++ 90353 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.247718960E09 +++$+++ Maybe it's just the way I'm thinking of it but the country article doesn't fit the list of countries per se, it could be in [[:Category:Bah\xe1'\xed history]]? As for the other ref - I just found it and will review. +++$+++ :::Maybe it's just the way I'm thinking of it but the country article doesn't fit the list of countries per se, it could be in [[:Category:Bahá'í history]]? As for the other ref - I just found it and will review.[[User:Smkolins|Smkolins]] ([[User talk:Smkolins|talk]]) 21:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
90355 +++$+++ Smkolins +++$+++ Wiki-uk +++$+++ 90351 +++$+++ 90354 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.247776800E09 +++$+++ I would agree with putting both Statistics and Country articles in their own category and that under history, but perhaps others should chime in. +++$+++ ::::I would agree with putting both Statistics and Country articles in their own category and that under history, but perhaps others should chime in.[[User:Smkolins|Smkolins]] ([[User talk:Smkolins|talk]]) 13:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

384671 +++$+++ Bgwhite +++$+++ Magioladitis +++$+++ 384671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-26 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.306468860E09 +++$+++ When <nowiki>{{bio}}<\/nowiki> is on a talk page with no listas, the module\/AWB will not add a listas parameter.  It adds a listas under every other conceivable way the bio banner is spelled.  I'm not sure if it is doing this 100% of the time as I'm not paying attention when it works.  +++$+++ When <nowiki>{{bio}}</nowiki> is on a talk page with no listas, the module/AWB will not add a listas parameter.  It adds a listas under every other conceivable way the bio banner is spelled.  I'm not sure if it is doing this 100% of the time as I'm not paying attention when it works. [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 21:01, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
384672 +++$+++ Magioladitis +++$+++ Magioladitis +++$+++ 384671 +++$+++ 384671 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.306507320E09 +++$+++ I suggest you rename bio to WikiProject Biography. There are only 10-20 transclusions of it. --  +++$+++ :I suggest you rename bio to WikiProject Biography. There are only 10-20 transclusions of it. -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis#top|talk]]) 07:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
384673 +++$+++ Bgwhite +++$+++ Magioladitis +++$+++ 384671 +++$+++ 384672 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.306551420E09 +++$+++ It renames <nowiki>{{bio}}<\/nowiki> just fine and I add listas in manually.  Just didn't know if it should be yet another biography variant added into the code.  The <nowiki>{{bio}}<\/nowiki> tag is being added to new articles at a higher rate than the 10-20 you have seen.  Of course, all the (#*$)@ variants is a story for another day.  Oh, thank you for a new release of AWB.  Yobot19 has gone thru the sections I had previously cleared out for weird names ... around 10,000 articles done by the bot.  It is so nice to see letters A-F mostly empty.  A second thank you for allowing me to use your code\/bot.  +++$+++ ::It renames <nowiki>{{bio}}</nowiki> just fine and I add listas in manually.  Just didn't know if it should be yet another biography variant added into the code.  The <nowiki>{{bio}}</nowiki> tag is being added to new articles at a higher rate than the 10-20 you have seen.  Of course, all the (#*$)@ variants is a story for another day.  Oh, thank you for a new release of AWB.  Yobot19 has gone thru the sections I had previously cleared out for weird names ... around 10,000 articles done by the bot.  It is so nice to see letters A-F mostly empty.  A second thank you for allowing me to use your code/bot. [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 19:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
384674 +++$+++ Magioladitis +++$+++ Magioladitis +++$+++ 384671 +++$+++ 384673 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.307110980E09 +++$+++ This redirect has been retargeted some times and it is rarely used. So I don't think we should take any further action. I hate changing the plugin's code every time someone comes with a new cool name for a redirect. --  +++$+++ :::This redirect has been retargeted some times and it is rarely used. So I don't think we should take any further action. I hate changing the plugin's code every time someone comes with a new cool name for a redirect. -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis#top|talk]]) 07:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

542112 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-12 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.194939060E09 +++$+++ Well, that's just what I have to work on. I can't seem to find a Python script that would do the trick; I imagine AWB would work, but it won't let me login there because I haven't been granted access to that (or have bot status granted). &nbsp;  +++$+++ Well, that's just what I have to work on. I can't seem to find a Python script that would do the trick; I imagine AWB would work, but it won't let me login there because I haven't been granted access to that (or have bot status granted). &nbsp; [[User:Jj137|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">jj137</font>]] (''[[User talk:Jj137|<font color="black" face="Times New Roman">Talk</font>]]'') 23:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
542113 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542112 +++$+++ 542112 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.194939660E09 +++$+++ OK, I've now done that. Do I have to wait until my bot is approved before I get \"bot status\"? (That way I can actually use the bot tasks on AWB and not just the ones for the normal user.) &nbsp;  +++$+++ :OK, I've now done that. Do I have to wait until my bot is approved before I get "bot status"? (That way I can actually use the bot tasks on AWB and not just the ones for the normal user.) &nbsp; [[User:Jj137|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">jj137</font>]] (''[[User talk:Jj137|<font color="black" face="Times New Roman">Talk</font>]]'') 23:41, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
542114 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542112 +++$+++ 542113 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.194939840E09 +++$+++ Great! Thanks for the help. &nbsp;  +++$+++ ::Great! Thanks for the help. &nbsp; [[User:Jj137|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">jj137</font>]] (''[[User talk:Jj137|<font color="black" face="Times New Roman">Talk</font>]]'') 23:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

17825 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-17 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.274115000E09 +++$+++ PS: This could be devoted to this one issue, in which case it might be only 500 words or so. Or an more complete article might cover all of \"The Small Cultural Revolution\" (\"Mica revolu\u0163ie cultural\u0103\"), with this event as just one small episode. I guess that would depend partly on what sources are available. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ PS: This could be devoted to this one issue, in which case it might be only 500 words or so. Or an more complete article might cover all of "The Small Cultural Revolution" ("Mica revoluţie culturală"), with this event as just one small episode. I guess that would depend partly on what sources are available. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 09:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
17826 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17825 +++$+++ 17825 +++$+++ 2010-05-17 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.274118540E09 +++$+++ I suggest that we see what we can find in sources first. From my experience, once the sources are at hand it's easy to write the article. Why don't we set up a sources page, I can copy in the meager sources I can contribute, and if you can find more that'd add to the soup. Whenever we have time to start drafting will be soon enough. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :I suggest that we see what we can find in sources first. From my experience, once the sources are at hand it's easy to write the article. Why don't we set up a sources page, I can copy in the meager sources I can contribute, and if you can find more that'd add to the soup. Whenever we have time to start drafting will be soon enough. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 10:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
17827 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17825 +++$+++ 17826 +++$+++ 2010-05-17 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.274120760E09 +++$+++ Excellent. I found several mentions in miscellaneous pubs archived by Google, including one that calls it a \"notorious scandal\". I've got a good library system for books in English, and access to some with journals. I'll check with those. Let's work at [[User talk:Will Beback\/TM-R]] for the time being. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::Excellent. I found several mentions in miscellaneous pubs archived by Google, including one that calls it a "notorious scandal". I've got a good library system for books in English, and access to some with journals. I'll check with those. Let's work at [[User talk:Will Beback/TM-R]] for the time being. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 11:26, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

542115 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542115 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-12 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.194940260E09 +++$+++ jj137, same as here. &nbsp;  +++$+++ jj137, same as here. &nbsp; [[User:Jj137|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">jj137</font>]] (''[[User talk:Jj137|<font color="black" face="Times New Roman">Talk</font>]]'') 23:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
542116 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542115 +++$+++ 542115 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.194940440E09 +++$+++ Oh no, I was unaware of that wiki. I was talking about [http:\/\/test.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Main_Page here]. &nbsp;  +++$+++ :Oh no, I was unaware of that wiki. I was talking about [http://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page here]. &nbsp; [[User:Jj137|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">jj137</font>]] (''[[User talk:Jj137|<font color="black" face="Times New Roman">Talk</font>]]'') 23:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
542117 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542115 +++$+++ 542116 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.194941160E09 +++$+++ OK, cool... I'm a b'crat on another wiki so I'm familiar with the powers, but it is always nice to have more :) &nbsp;  +++$+++ ::OK, cool... I'm a b'crat on another wiki so I'm familiar with the powers, but it is always nice to have more :) &nbsp; [[User:Jj137|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">jj137</font>]] (''[[User talk:Jj137|<font color="black" face="Times New Roman">Talk</font>]]'') 00:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
542118 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542115 +++$+++ 542117 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.194941220E09 +++$+++ So go and create your account, and I will make you an admin and a b'crat... should you wish. <font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::So go and create your account, and I will make you an admin and a b'crat... should you wish. <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="3">[[User:Dreamafter|<font color="red">Dreamy</font>]]</font> <font size="2">[[User talk:Dreamafter|<font color="purple"><sup>§</sup></font>]]</font> 00:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
542119 +++$+++ Jj137 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542115 +++$+++ 542118 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.194941340E09 +++$+++ That sounds great... I made my account a few minutes ago so go ahead and do as you wish. &nbsp;  +++$+++ ::::That sounds great... I made my account a few minutes ago so go ahead and do as you wish. &nbsp; [[User:Jj137|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">jj137</font>]] (''[[User talk:Jj137|<font color="black" face="Times New Roman">Talk</font>]]'') 00:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

17828 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-19 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.274266860E09 +++$+++ Hi!  I have reviewed your DYK nomination for [[D. Iacobescu]], and identified several problems.  [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#D._Iacobescu|Please visit the nomination discussion for a full explanation]], and if you feel you have addressed my concerns feel free to leave a message on my talk page inviting me to reassess the nomination. -  +++$+++ Hi!  I have reviewed your DYK nomination for [[D. Iacobescu]], and identified several problems.  [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#D._Iacobescu|Please visit the nomination discussion for a full explanation]], and if you feel you have addressed my concerns feel free to leave a message on my talk page inviting me to reassess the nomination. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 04:01, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
17829 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17828 +++$+++ 17828 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.274269020E09 +++$+++ Have replied to your rebuttal (still not approved).  It's not personal, it's just my understanding of the DYK rules. -  +++$+++ *Have replied to your rebuttal (still not approved).  It's not personal, it's just my understanding of the DYK rules. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 04:37, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
17830 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17828 +++$+++ 17829 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.274272500E09 +++$+++ I have read your message on my talk page and interpreted it as \"Thank you for taking the time to review my DYK nomination, which until you visited it had languished in the queue for two weeks. I disagree with your opinion but nevertheless I appreciate the time you have spent arriving at it.\"  With that in mind, I don't intend to revisit this nomination.  My opinion stands and you're welcome to try and convince another editor to disagree with it. Congratulations on a good article, whether or not you manage to surmount the technicalities of DYK. -  +++$+++ **I have read your message on my talk page and interpreted it as "Thank you for taking the time to review my DYK nomination, which until you visited it had languished in the queue for two weeks. I disagree with your opinion but nevertheless I appreciate the time you have spent arriving at it."  With that in mind, I don't intend to revisit this nomination.  My opinion stands and you're welcome to try and convince another editor to disagree with it. Congratulations on a good article, whether or not you manage to surmount the technicalities of DYK. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 05:35, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
17831 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17828 +++$+++ 17830 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.274277600E09 +++$+++ You know, if you'd just spend as much time improving the article or the hook as you've spent improving your argument at DYK, the nomination would probably be approved by now. -  +++$+++ ***You know, if you'd just spend as much time improving the article or the hook as you've spent improving your argument at DYK, the nomination would probably be approved by now. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 07:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
17832 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17828 +++$+++ 17831 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.274279160E09 +++$+++ Reviewing articles at DYK is on a volunteer basis.  When I spend my time to review a nomination, you're certainly not obliged to agree with me, but it would be polite to acknowledge that I don't owe you anything, avoid words like \"absurd\" in replying to me, and acknowledge that I am doing my best to help you create a hook that meets the community-agreed DYK rules, which state the hook must include a definite fact that \"must be mentioned in the article\" - not \"must be able to be extrapolated from the article\".  I think we can both agree that building good articles is more productive than arguing on DYK, so next time you get a hook knocked back can I suggest you just go make a better article?  You get the same result at the end of the day as you will from arguing the point, you don't end up offending people who are just trying to help you get your hook featured, and the article ends up clearer, more detailed, or more readable.  Materialscientist has okayed your hook now - which I don't agree with, but I don't have to - so take this all as lessons learned for next time. -  +++$+++ ****Reviewing articles at DYK is on a volunteer basis.  When I spend my time to review a nomination, you're certainly not obliged to agree with me, but it would be polite to acknowledge that I don't owe you anything, avoid words like "absurd" in replying to me, and acknowledge that I am doing my best to help you create a hook that meets the community-agreed DYK rules, which state the hook must include a definite fact that "must be mentioned in the article" - not "must be able to be extrapolated from the article".  I think we can both agree that building good articles is more productive than arguing on DYK, so next time you get a hook knocked back can I suggest you just go make a better article?  You get the same result at the end of the day as you will from arguing the point, you don't end up offending people who are just trying to help you get your hook featured, and the article ends up clearer, more detailed, or more readable.  Materialscientist has okayed your hook now - which I don't agree with, but I don't have to - so take this all as lessons learned for next time. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 07:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
17833 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17828 +++$+++ 17832 +++$+++ 2010-05-19 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.274280600E09 +++$+++ Read [[WP:OR]]: '''Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources.''' If a source says he went to high school, and another source says he died at age 19, it is an impermissible synthesis to say \"he died shortly after going to high school\" unless you can find a source that ''explicitly states that''.  (For example, he might have been a child prodigy who finished high school at age 15.) If you think WP:OR means something different, that's great, but take it up at the WP:OR talk page; don't give me grief for a literal application of community-agreed policy. -  +++$+++ *****Read [[WP:OR]]: '''Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources.''' If a source says he went to high school, and another source says he died at age 19, it is an impermissible synthesis to say "he died shortly after going to high school" unless you can find a source that ''explicitly states that''.  (For example, he might have been a child prodigy who finished high school at age 15.) If you think WP:OR means something different, that's great, but take it up at the WP:OR talk page; don't give me grief for a literal application of community-agreed policy. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 07:50, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

279973 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-17 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.179403380E09 +++$+++ Hi, Paul, don't think we've met, but I tend to have an eye on arbitration matters, and I just wanted to say I think you do a great job. I find your comments and insights are typically among the wisest offered. So, keep up the work (it can't be much fun to deal with the worst disputes on Wikipedia, but someone's got to do it!)  +++$+++ Hi, Paul, don't think we've met, but I tend to have an eye on arbitration matters, and I just wanted to say I think you do a great job. I find your comments and insights are typically among the wisest offered. So, keep up the work (it can't be much fun to deal with the worst disputes on Wikipedia, but someone's got to do it!) [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 05:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
279974 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279973 +++$+++ 279973 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.179445500E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ :Thank you. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

279975 +++$+++ Arthur_Rubin +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279975 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-20 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.179705720E09 +++$+++ Someone recently redirected the talk page to follow the article merge.  I reversed it, as the talk page was redirecting to the article page, but I think we need a soft redirect, See Also, or merge of the talk page to that of the article the page was merged into.  Any ideas? &mdash;  +++$+++ Someone recently redirected the talk page to follow the article merge.  I reversed it, as the talk page was redirecting to the article page, but I think we need a soft redirect, See Also, or merge of the talk page to that of the article the page was merged into.  Any ideas? &mdash; [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] |  [[User_talk:Arthur_Rubin|(talk)]] 17:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
279976 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279975 +++$+++ 279975 +++$+++ 2007-05-20 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.179716940E09 +++$+++ I think things are just fine the way they are.  +++$+++ :I think things are just fine the way they are. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

265116 +++$+++ Oo7565 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265116 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-24 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.214356920E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.  <small>Do you want to [[Template:Bots#Message notification opt out|opt out]] of receiving this notice?<\/small><!-- Template:PRODWarning -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.  <small>Do you want to [[Template:Bots#Message notification opt out|opt out]] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Oo7565|Oo7565]] ([[User talk:Oo7565|talk]]) 18:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
265117 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265116 +++$+++ 265116 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.214364180E09 +++$+++ I have added a longer description of the group with more citations.  +++$+++ :I have added a longer description of the group with more citations. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 20:23, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

279979 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-17 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.182078720E09 +++$+++ Hi and welcome back (I hope soon). Upon your return, you'll notice that the list of arbitration cases is similar to how it looked when you left. You were moved to \"away\" while you were away, so please let us know whether you'd like to be restored to active status on all pending cases, or only on cases accepted after your return, or whether you'd like to handle it on a case-by-case basis. Hope you had a good trip and break. Regards,  +++$+++ Hi and welcome back (I hope soon). Upon your return, you'll notice that the list of arbitration cases is similar to how it looked when you left. You were moved to "away" while you were away, so please let us know whether you'd like to be restored to active status on all pending cases, or only on cases accepted after your return, or whether you'd like to handle it on a case-by-case basis. Hope you had a good trip and break. Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 04:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
279980 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279979 +++$+++ 279979 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.182193920E09 +++$+++ Hi Brad. Case-by-case seems best. It may take me awhile to get back into the swing of things. It was a good trip, but too short.  +++$+++ :Hi Brad. Case-by-case seems best. It may take me awhile to get back into the swing of things. It was a good trip, but too short. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 12:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
279981 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279979 +++$+++ 279980 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.182196860E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'll make a note on our noticeboard to only move you to active on cases where you request it or cast a vote. But please dig in, there's plenty to do. :)  +++$+++ ::Okay, I'll make a note on our noticeboard to only move you to active on cases where you request it or cast a vote. But please dig in, there's plenty to do. :) [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 13:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

17836 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17836 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-08 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.276064280E09 +++$+++ Uh, would you mind not editing a prep while I'm right smack in the middle of adding stuff? <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ Uh, would you mind not editing a prep while I'm right smack in the middle of adding stuff? <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 23:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
17837 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17836 +++$+++ 17836 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.276065000E09 +++$+++ RE<span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :RE<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 23:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
17838 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17836 +++$+++ 17837 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.276066260E09 +++$+++ No hope. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::No hope. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 23:51, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

279982 +++$+++ Cronholm144 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-24 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.182730200E09 +++$+++ Hello Paul, I understand that you are a mathematician. In light of this fact, I was wondering if you could help me correct all of the wikipedia articles having to do with Newton and Leibniz. Recently some  very exiting [http:\/\/www.helsinki.fi\/~mroinila\/NewtonLeibniz.pdf evidence] came out with regards to these two men(a until recently unknown correspondence!). However, I do not want to spoil it for you. Please let me know if you are willing to help me out, thanks -- +++$+++ Hello Paul, I understand that you are a mathematician. In light of this fact, I was wondering if you could help me correct all of the wikipedia articles having to do with Newton and Leibniz. Recently some  very exiting [http://www.helsinki.fi/~mroinila/NewtonLeibniz.pdf evidence] came out with regards to these two men(a until recently unknown correspondence!). However, I do not want to spoil it for you. Please let me know if you are willing to help me out, thanks --[[User:Cronholm144|Cronholm]]<sup>[[User talk:Cronholm144|144]]</sup> 17:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
279983 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279982 +++$+++ 279982 +++$+++ 2007-06-24 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.182732540E09 +++$+++ Hi Chronholm, thanks for the offer, but I'm a bit busy these days.  +++$+++ :Hi Chronholm, thanks for the offer, but I'm a bit busy these days. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:49, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

17840 +++$+++ AdiJapan +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17840 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-09 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.276099680E09 +++$+++ The first sentence in the lead will need rephrasing to make room for the IPA's and to give it a logical and readable shape. \u2014  +++$+++ The first sentence in the lead will need rephrasing to make room for the IPA's and to give it a logical and readable shape. — [[User:AdiJapan|<font color="#048">'''Adi'''</font>]][[User Talk:AdiJapan|<font color="#37B">Japan</font>]] 09:08, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
17841 +++$+++ AdiJapan +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17840 +++$+++ 17840 +++$+++ 2010-06-09 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.276115400E09 +++$+++ See my attempt: [[Benjamin Fondane]]. I preferred the version without IPA for ''Barbu'', because it would just amplify the already messy lead, without really giving any useful information. But if you want to add it, you can copy+paste the code for this: {{IPA-ro|\u02c8barbu|}} (see what I mean?). \u2014  +++$+++ :See my attempt: [[Benjamin Fondane]]. I preferred the version without IPA for ''Barbu'', because it would just amplify the already messy lead, without really giving any useful information. But if you want to add it, you can copy+paste the code for this: {{IPA-ro|ˈbarbu|}} (see what I mean?). — [[User:AdiJapan|<font color="#048">'''Adi'''</font>]][[User Talk:AdiJapan|<font color="#37B">Japan</font>]] 13:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
17842 +++$+++ Camdan +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17840 +++$+++ 17840 +++$+++ 2010-06-13 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.276452720E09 +++$+++ Excellent work on Scibor Rylski! Im really grateful for Your kind help with the article! I dont think that I can add anything! I will just check the \"red\" links if I can find the names of those places or names. Again, I really appreciate! Best regards,  +++$+++ : Excellent work on Scibor Rylski! Im really grateful for Your kind help with the article! I dont think that I can add anything! I will just check the "red" links if I can find the names of those places or names. Again, I really appreciate! Best regards, [[User:Camdan|Camdan]] ([[User talk:Camdan|talk]]) 11:12, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
17843 +++$+++ Camdan +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17840 +++$+++ 17840 +++$+++ 2010-06-14 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.276505880E09 +++$+++ Greetings! I manage the links in the references, its all there. Maybe not so easy to find his name in all the sources but its all there. Regarding the notes, its about the paragraph. Most of his life is to be found in one or two books, so that is why there are not so many notes but all this information is in the books. I hope that what I did was ok! Best regards,  +++$+++ * Greetings! I manage the links in the references, its all there. Maybe not so easy to find his name in all the sources but its all there. Regarding the notes, its about the paragraph. Most of his life is to be found in one or two books, so that is why there are not so many notes but all this information is in the books. I hope that what I did was ok! Best regards, [[User:Camdan|Camdan]] ([[User talk:Camdan|talk]]) 01:58, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
17844 +++$+++ Camdan +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17840 +++$+++ 17840 +++$+++ 2010-06-14 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.276508700E09 +++$+++ You have really been of great help! I will try to use this new knowledge when creating or improving new articles, Im working on several others! :) +++$+++ : You have really been of great help! I will try to use this new knowledge when creating or improving new articles, Im working on several others! :)[[User:Camdan|Camdan]] ([[User talk:Camdan|talk]]) 02:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
17845 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17840 +++$+++ 17844 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.276734720E09 +++$+++ Dahn, I felt that your major effort on this article deserved some recognition, so I've {{diff2|368423706|added you}} as co-creator.  +++$+++ ::Dahn, I felt that your major effort on this article deserved some recognition, so I've {{diff2|368423706|added you}} as co-creator. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 17:32, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

279987 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-08 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.183957080E09 +++$+++ We're really going to promulgate an arbitration finding captioned \"three-layer cake with frosting\"? :) Regards,  +++$+++ We're really going to promulgate an arbitration finding captioned "three-layer cake with frosting"? :) Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 21:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
279988 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279987 +++$+++ 279987 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.183967520E09 +++$+++ (''Rolls eyes'') Apparently so. Not ''my'' style, but probably not worth fussing over. If you want though, I'll broach the subject on the AC mailing list.  +++$+++ : (''Rolls eyes'') Apparently so. Not ''my'' style, but probably not worth fussing over. If you want though, I'll broach the subject on the AC mailing list. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
279989 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279987 +++$+++ 279988 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.183968960E09 +++$+++ You're probably right to let it go; for what it's worth, we'll probably have already crossed the Rubicon with the impending adoption of a remedy in another case prescribing that editors violating the ruling \"will be hit on the head with sticks until the situation improves.\" I have made a note of the creative opportunities now open to me for future workshop proposals. :) Regards,  +++$+++ ::You're probably right to let it go; for what it's worth, we'll probably have already crossed the Rubicon with the impending adoption of a remedy in another case prescribing that editors violating the ruling "will be hit on the head with sticks until the situation improves." I have made a note of the creative opportunities now open to me for future workshop proposals. :) Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 01:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

265118 +++$+++ Grrrlriot +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-06 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.215399180E09 +++$+++ Hello! :) I thought you might be interested in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies\/Feminism Task Force|this]]. Check it out and add your name under \"Participants\" if your interested. Have a nice day and happy editing! -- +++$+++ Hello! :) I thought you might be interested in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies/Feminism Task Force|this]]. Check it out and add your name under "Participants" if your interested. Have a nice day and happy editing! --[[User:Grrrlriot|Grrrlriot]] ([[User talk:Grrrlriot|talk]]) 19:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
265119 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265118 +++$+++ 265118 +++$+++ 2008-07-06 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.215410220E09 +++$+++ Thanks , I have joined up.  +++$+++ :Thanks , I have joined up. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 22:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
265120 +++$+++ Grrrlriot +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265118 +++$+++ 265119 +++$+++ 2008-07-06 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.215410700E09 +++$+++ Great! :) Thanks for joining and welcome to the task force! -- +++$+++ ::Great! :) Thanks for joining and welcome to the task force! --[[User:Grrrlriot|Grrrlriot]] ([[User talk:Grrrlriot|talk]]) 23:05, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
265121 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265118 +++$+++ 265118 +++$+++ 2008-07-16 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.216231140E09 +++$+++ You need to find 3rd party news reports for both articles. Has she done any interviews with magazines or newspapers that are not published by her organisation? Find these and add them now to the article as citations and references. Otherwise I'm afaid I can offer little hope for the articles. Suggest you make personal back up copies of the wiki mark up so when such refferences do appear you can have a go at reinstatement.  +++$+++ :You need to find 3rd party news reports for both articles. Has she done any interviews with magazines or newspapers that are not published by her organisation? Find these and add them now to the article as citations and references. Otherwise I'm afaid I can offer little hope for the articles. Suggest you make personal back up copies of the wiki mark up so when such refferences do appear you can have a go at reinstatement. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 10:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

279992 +++$+++ Neutralhomer +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-11 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.184143200E09 +++$+++ I was wondering if ArbCom would be taking up the [[User:TREYWiki]] case or if anyone from ArbCom had looked it over.  According to an admin, it was emailed in.  ArbCom's attention would be appericated.  Thanks.... +++$+++ I was wondering if ArbCom would be taking up the [[User:TREYWiki]] case or if anyone from ArbCom had looked it over.  According to an admin, it was emailed in.  ArbCom's attention would be appericated.  Thanks....[[User:Neutralhomer|<font color="#0000C8">NeutralHomer</font>]] <span style="font-size: 0.8em;"><sup>[[User Talk:Neutralhomer|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Neutralhomer|C]]</sup></span> 01:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
279993 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279992 +++$+++ 279992 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.184199240E09 +++$+++ I'll take a look.  +++$+++ :I'll take a look. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

279994 +++$+++ JBFrenchhorn +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-13 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.184318220E09 +++$+++ Jeffrey  +++$+++ Jeffrey [[User:JBFrenchhorn|JBFrenchhorn]] 02:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
279995 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279994 +++$+++ 279994 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.184319540E09 +++$+++ Hi Jeff. Your deletion seems sound.  +++$+++ :Hi Jeff. Your deletion seems sound. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

279999 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279999 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-16 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.184608860E09 +++$+++ OK, [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\/Log\/2007 July 16#Code2000|here's]] your chance to comment on the DRV. As I post this, there is only one remark, and it's as clueless and lazy as the comments at the AfD \u2014 too lazy even to try my pre-packaged web search link. Sigh. -- +++$+++ OK, [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 July 16#Code2000|here's]] your chance to comment on the DRV. As I post this, there is only one remark, and it's as clueless and lazy as the comments at the AfD — too lazy even to try my pre-packaged web search link. Sigh. --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 11:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
280000 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279999 +++$+++ 279999 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.184642040E09 +++$+++ I've commented at the DRV.  +++$+++ :I've commented at the DRV. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:14, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
280001 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279999 +++$+++ 280000 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.184779440E09 +++$+++ Meanwhile, an understandably annoyed editor has made Code2000 a redirect \u2014 to a [[Unicode typefaces|page]] that links back to Code2000! (I left a personal message to go to the DRV.) I'm thinking it would be more helpful to expunge that, leaving the redlink so more people will notice. But I don't know the protocol, and I don't know what that does to the edit history and restoring the previous article. -- +++$+++ :: Meanwhile, an understandably annoyed editor has made Code2000 a redirect — to a [[Unicode typefaces|page]] that links back to Code2000! (I left a personal message to go to the DRV.) I'm thinking it would be more helpful to expunge that, leaving the redlink so more people will notice. But I don't know the protocol, and I don't know what that does to the edit history and restoring the previous article. --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 10:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
280002 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279999 +++$+++ 279999 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.184818680E09 +++$+++ This will all soon be sorted.  +++$+++ :This will all soon be sorted. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
280003 +++$+++ KSmrq +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 279999 +++$+++ 280002 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.185234780E09 +++$+++ Incidentally, the [[STIX Fonts project]] site says \"Font Set Beta Release Targeted for 23 July\", which is today. Based on past history the release will be delayed; but Real Soon Now. <tt>:-)<\/tt> -- +++$+++ :: Incidentally, the [[STIX Fonts project]] site says "Font Set Beta Release Targeted for 23 July", which is today. Based on past history the release will be delayed; but Real Soon Now. <tt>:-)</tt> --[[User:KSmrq|KSmrq]]<sup>[[User talk:KSmrq|T]]</sup> 16:53, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

17856 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17856 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-27 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.293511020E09 +++$+++ Well, take your time settling back in, <s>no urgency to any of this<\/s> (well, maybe a slight urgency [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Jehovah%27s_Witnesses_Association_of_Romania&diff=405323156&oldid=378995214 here]), and see you around. -  +++$+++ Well, take your time settling back in, <s>no urgency to any of this</s> (well, maybe a slight urgency [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jehovah%27s_Witnesses_Association_of_Romania&diff=405323156&oldid=378995214 here]), and see you around. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 20:37, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
17857 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17856 +++$+++ 17856 +++$+++ 2011-01-06 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.294306860E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your input, and sorry about the flak you took. We've seen these tactics before, and they're always a disappointment. Some are continually trying to turn this into a place unde trebuie sa sufli \xeen iaurt la orice mi\u015fcare, and I for one will not allow them to succeed. Indeed, let me ask you up front: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Ion_Cre\u0163u&diff=406149871&oldid=406147122 ''is'' Mr Cre\u0163u an expert on postmodernism in Romania]? Does that justify retention of his autobiography? -  +++$+++ :Thank you for your input, and sorry about the flak you took. We've seen these tactics before, and they're always a disappointment. Some are continually trying to turn this into a place unde trebuie sa sufli în iaurt la orice mişcare, and I for one will not allow them to succeed. Indeed, let me ask you up front: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ion_Creţu&diff=406149871&oldid=406147122 ''is'' Mr Creţu an expert on postmodernism in Romania]? Does that justify retention of his autobiography? - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 01:41, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

17858 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17858 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-07 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.294411320E09 +++$+++ But most extreme is [[Special:Contributions\/Lidiavianu|this woman]]: repeatedly uploads her autobiography across [[Lidia Vianu|five years]], and following the second deletion at AfD, [[User_talk:Courcelles#Lidia_Vianu.2C_Reference_for_entry_-_6_January_2011.2C_13:37h|rushes to have the decision reversed]]. Let's hope it isn't, but it's amazing how persistent some of these jokers are. -  +++$+++ But most extreme is [[Special:Contributions/Lidiavianu|this woman]]: repeatedly uploads her autobiography across [[Lidia Vianu|five years]], and following the second deletion at AfD, [[User_talk:Courcelles#Lidia_Vianu.2C_Reference_for_entry_-_6_January_2011.2C_13:37h|rushes to have the decision reversed]]. Let's hope it isn't, but it's amazing how persistent some of these jokers are. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 06:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
17859 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17858 +++$+++ 17858 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.295928480E09 +++$+++ [[Celts in Transylvania]] and [[Bronze Age in Romania]]: hmm. -  +++$+++ :[[Celts in Transylvania]] and [[Bronze Age in Romania]]: hmm. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 20:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

17860 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-19 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.298120400E09 +++$+++ I wonder, wasn't [[1940 Vrancea earthquake]] supposed to be at [[1940 Bucharest earthquake]]? Though now I notice the move to [[1977 Vrancea earthquake]]. Also note: [[Romania Anti-Religious Campaign]]. Well, not quite on the level of [[Prehistory of Transylvania]]! -  +++$+++ I wonder, wasn't [[1940 Vrancea earthquake]] supposed to be at [[1940 Bucharest earthquake]]? Though now I notice the move to [[1977 Vrancea earthquake]]. Also note: [[Romania Anti-Religious Campaign]]. Well, not quite on the level of [[Prehistory of Transylvania]]! - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 05:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
17861 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17860 +++$+++ 17860 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.298185320E09 +++$+++ It does seem that way, but [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Ion Filotti|one by one]] they go down... One hopes a previously-unknown [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/League of Romanian Students Abroad|League]] suffers the same fate. -  +++$+++ :It does seem that way, but [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ion Filotti|one by one]] they go down... One hopes a previously-unknown [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/League of Romanian Students Abroad|League]] suffers the same fate. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 23:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

542151 +++$+++ Aatomic1 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542151 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-24 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.195968480E09 +++$+++ ...and if you are still in the dark follow the link [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Arbitration enforcement#Edit warring related to \"The Troubles\"]].  +++$+++ ...and if you are still in the dark follow the link [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement#Edit warring related to "The Troubles"]]. [[User:Aatomic1|Aatomic1]] ([[User talk:Aatomic1|talk]]) 21:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
542152 +++$+++ Aatomic1 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542151 +++$+++ 542151 +++$+++ 2007-11-24 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.195969260E09 +++$+++ If you are aware of the nuances I would strongly advise you not to be manipulated with comments like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User%3ADreamafter%2FMediation%2FAnswer%2FSummaries%2FFinal%2FDiscussion&diff=173558161&oldid=173554053 this].  +++$+++ * If you are aware of the nuances I would strongly advise you not to be manipulated with comments like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ADreamafter%2FMediation%2FAnswer%2FSummaries%2FFinal%2FDiscussion&diff=173558161&oldid=173554053 this]. [[User:Aatomic1|Aatomic1]] ([[User talk:Aatomic1|talk]]) 21:41, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
542153 +++$+++ Aatomic1 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542151 +++$+++ 542151 +++$+++ 2007-11-24 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.195969560E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/wikimediafoundation.org\/donate\/2007\/psa\/ Or as Jimbo would say].  +++$+++ *[http://wikimediafoundation.org/donate/2007/psa/ Or as Jimbo would say]. [[User:Aatomic1|Aatomic1]] ([[User talk:Aatomic1|talk]]) 21:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
542154 +++$+++ Padraig +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542151 +++$+++ 542153 +++$+++ 2007-11-24 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.195972380E09 +++$+++ I think its now time for the enforcement of the troubles mediation [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Birmingham_pub_bombings&curid=379943&diff=173568694&oldid=173566454 as Atomic] is editing warring again.-- +++$+++ ::I think its now time for the enforcement of the troubles mediation [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Birmingham_pub_bombings&curid=379943&diff=173568694&oldid=173566454 as Atomic] is editing warring again.--[[User:Padraig|Padraig]] ([[User talk:Padraig|talk]]) 22:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
542155 +++$+++ Hughsheehy +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542151 +++$+++ 542154 +++$+++ 2007-11-25 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.196041320E09 +++$+++ Hi Dreamafter.  I think that you need to take a look at the conclusion of your mediation on the Birmingham Pub Bombings.  The conclusion and reasons you've given are entirely unsatisfactory.  I think we now need to move that discussion to a more formal review.  I'm extremely disappointed that after '''months''' of patient waiting since the initial discussions you would do something like ignoring many of the contributions and moving to close the mediation within an hour, stating incorrectly that only one editor is supporting the inclusion of victim information.   +++$+++ :::Hi Dreamafter.  I think that you need to take a look at the conclusion of your mediation on the Birmingham Pub Bombings.  The conclusion and reasons you've given are entirely unsatisfactory.  I think we now need to move that discussion to a more formal review.  I'm extremely disappointed that after '''months''' of patient waiting since the initial discussions you would do something like ignoring many of the contributions and moving to close the mediation within an hour, stating incorrectly that only one editor is supporting the inclusion of victim information.  [[User:Hughsheehy|Hughsheehy]] ([[User talk:Hughsheehy|talk]]) 17:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

280010 +++$+++ Gregbard +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280010 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-01 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.186028760E09 +++$+++ Has there ever been a WikiProject with so many people sabbotaging it at every step? WHY O WHY O WHY are you holding the tagging hostage? I have been waiting for weeks to see what we have under the assessment chart. What exactly is it that you were supporting when you signed up \"in support\" of the logic project if we can't tag the pages? This is bad faith. I did everything right, and people still find a way to shit on my efforts. If you are going to vote no, then you are going to have to be responsible for any move forward. Please work with Trovatore, to start the bot with some kind of list or the project is going to end up shut down. I am certainly not going to tag those myself.  +++$+++ Has there ever been a WikiProject with so many people sabbotaging it at every step? WHY O WHY O WHY are you holding the tagging hostage? I have been waiting for weeks to see what we have under the assessment chart. What exactly is it that you were supporting when you signed up "in support" of the logic project if we can't tag the pages? This is bad faith. I did everything right, and people still find a way to shit on my efforts. If you are going to vote no, then you are going to have to be responsible for any move forward. Please work with Trovatore, to start the bot with some kind of list or the project is going to end up shut down. I am certainly not going to tag those myself. [[User:Gregbard|Gregbard]] 21:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
280011 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280010 +++$+++ 280010 +++$+++ 2007-08-01 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.186029240E09 +++$+++ I am sorry you feel frustrated. I signed up for the logic project because I'm interested in logic and improving that part of the encyclopedia. But I think it is problematic to tag so many articles which do not seem to me to fall into scope of the project.  +++$+++ :I am sorry you feel frustrated. I signed up for the logic project because I'm interested in logic and improving that part of the encyclopedia. But I think it is problematic to tag so many articles which do not seem to me to fall into scope of the project. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
280012 +++$+++ Gregbard +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280010 +++$+++ 280011 +++$+++ 2007-08-01 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.186037160E09 +++$+++ There is more than enough justification for all of these categories. These guys have no place saying  what ISN'T logic. It doesn't work that way. They say themselves that they don't get it. So, what are you going to do to help move this thing forward on behalf of the whole project? If we have to \"consensus\" our way forward the project is over because of these guys. It just gets folded up into WikiProject Math. Screw anyone else. That includes linguistics, and computer science too I guess. Screw 'em all. I have put in a plea for help at project systemic bias, and at npov.   +++$+++ ::There is more than enough justification for all of these categories. These guys have no place saying  what ISN'T logic. It doesn't work that way. They say themselves that they don't get it. So, what are you going to do to help move this thing forward on behalf of the whole project? If we have to "consensus" our way forward the project is over because of these guys. It just gets folded up into WikiProject Math. Screw anyone else. That includes linguistics, and computer science too I guess. Screw 'em all. I have put in a plea for help at project systemic bias, and at npov.  [[User:Gregbard|Gregbard]] 23:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
280013 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280010 +++$+++ 280011 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.186043700E09 +++$+++ You're not going to get anywhere with an attitude like that. Consensus is the way we do things on Wikipedia.  +++$+++ ::You're not going to get anywhere with an attitude like that. Consensus is the way we do things on Wikipedia. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 01:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

527266 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-08 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.239195720E09 +++$+++ For example, [[Platoon Leaders Class]] and [[Officer Candidates Course]] seemed unlikely to grow beyond what they were, so I merged them to [[Officer Candidates School (U.S. Marine Corps)]], and the combined article makes for a much more rich understanding. However, the talk pages have some discussion, and they are still into [[:Category:Stub-Class military history articles]] and the like because of {{tl|WPMILHIST}} being on the talk pages. ''' +++$+++ For example, [[Platoon Leaders Class]] and [[Officer Candidates Course]] seemed unlikely to grow beyond what they were, so I merged them to [[Officer Candidates School (U.S. Marine Corps)]], and the combined article makes for a much more rich understanding. However, the talk pages have some discussion, and they are still into [[:Category:Stub-Class military history articles]] and the like because of {{tl|WPMILHIST}} being on the talk pages. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  06:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
527267 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527266 +++$+++ 527266 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.239226440E09 +++$+++ In seriousness, please let me know when you create a new article for this category and I will do my magic on it, if I can find a suitable reference. ''' +++$+++ :In seriousness, please let me know when you create a new article for this category and I will do my magic on it, if I can find a suitable reference. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000;">bahamut0013</span>]]'''[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sup><small>words</small></sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#D2B48C;color:#000;"><sub><small>deeds</small></sub></span>]]  14:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

280014 +++$+++ Paolo.dL +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-06 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.186417980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Paolo.dL|Paolo.dL]] 09:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
280015 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280014 +++$+++ 280014 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.186444440E09 +++$+++ Hi Paolo. I saw your refactoring (a process with which I am very familiar) and your post to me about it. I don't think it is a good idea to edit other peoples comments. But I don't have a big problem with your edits there. The issue of \"credit\" certainly doesn't matter. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Paolo. I saw your refactoring (a process with which I am very familiar) and your post to me about it. I don't think it is a good idea to edit other peoples comments. But I don't have a big problem with your edits there. The issue of "credit" certainly doesn't matter. Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

280018 +++$+++ Daoken +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-22 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.187807280E09 +++$+++ I will most appreciate if you find the time to drop me a line about how can I help with my background and experience in arbitration  +++$+++ I will most appreciate if you find the time to drop me a line about how can I help with my background and experience in arbitration [[user:Daoken|'''''<font color="003366">Dao</font>''''']][[User_talk:Daoken|'''''<font color="00A86B">ken</font>''''']] 11:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
280019 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280018 +++$+++ 280018 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.187830200E09 +++$+++ Hi Daoken. There are several ways your expertise might be useful. You can participate in any our dispute resolution processes (see [[WP:DR]]), these include, among others, RFCs (see [[WP:RFC]]), mediation (see [[WP:M]]) and arbitration (see [[WP:AP]]). As for arbitration, any editor is welcome to participate in any arbitration case (see [[WP:RFAR]]), for example, by providing evidence on a case's evidence page (e.g. see [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Zacheus-jkb\/Evidence]]), or by helping to craft proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies, on a case's workshop page (e.g. [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Zacheus-jkb\/Workshop]]) which help the arbiters in writing there decision (e.g. [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Zacheus-jkb\/Proposed decision]]). You can also help with arbitration cases by clerking (see [[WP:CLERK]]). Or you might want to consider becoming an arbiter (see [[WP:AC]]) I hope this helps. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Daoken. There are several ways your expertise might be useful. You can participate in any our dispute resolution processes (see [[WP:DR]]), these include, among others, RFCs (see [[WP:RFC]]), mediation (see [[WP:M]]) and arbitration (see [[WP:AP]]). As for arbitration, any editor is welcome to participate in any arbitration case (see [[WP:RFAR]]), for example, by providing evidence on a case's evidence page (e.g. see [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zacheus-jkb/Evidence]]), or by helping to craft proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies, on a case's workshop page (e.g. [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zacheus-jkb/Workshop]]) which help the arbiters in writing there decision (e.g. [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zacheus-jkb/Proposed decision]]). You can also help with arbitration cases by clerking (see [[WP:CLERK]]). Or you might want to consider becoming an arbiter (see [[WP:AC]]) I hope this helps. Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
280020 +++$+++ Daoken +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280018 +++$+++ 280019 +++$+++ 2007-08-22 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.187832420E09 +++$+++ I thank you for the information and your time. I can see that to provide help in those areas is more an initiative from the user to get involved than a process of locating specialized knowledge. It is a fine way to do things, I sincerely hope it works as needed, I think it probably do. I don't have all the online time that may be necessary for pursuing that escalated involvement, but if at any time there appears the need to consult a professional mediator and arbitrator, which may happen in some special situation, please feel free to drop me a line, I will be most glad in lending a hand at backstage. You know where to find me. Thank you, my congratulations for the work you are doing and all my best  +++$+++ ::I thank you for the information and your time. I can see that to provide help in those areas is more an initiative from the user to get involved than a process of locating specialized knowledge. It is a fine way to do things, I sincerely hope it works as needed, I think it probably do. I don't have all the online time that may be necessary for pursuing that escalated involvement, but if at any time there appears the need to consult a professional mediator and arbitrator, which may happen in some special situation, please feel free to drop me a line, I will be most glad in lending a hand at backstage. You know where to find me. Thank you, my congratulations for the work you are doing and all my best [[user:Daoken|'''''<font color="003366">Dao</font>''''']][[User_talk:Daoken|'''''<font color="00A86B">ken</font>''''']] 18:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

542164 +++$+++ Hughsheehy +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-28 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.196306580E09 +++$+++ Hi.  Not only do I think that the current \"mediation\" is going nowhere in particular (and I'm going to continue to push for a more formal process), but even your attempt to nominate a highly partisan participant of the discussion as a mediator also damages your standing as a non-involved party.   +++$+++ Hi.  Not only do I think that the current "mediation" is going nowhere in particular (and I'm going to continue to push for a more formal process), but even your attempt to nominate a highly partisan participant of the discussion as a mediator also damages your standing as a non-involved party.  [[User:Hughsheehy|Hughsheehy]] ([[User talk:Hughsheehy|talk]]) 19:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
542165 +++$+++ One Night In Hackney +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542164 +++$+++ 542164 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.196487420E09 +++$+++ As I said, I consider it pointless to continue with the mediation. Even taking it to MEDCOM will probably be a waste of time with the current unwillingness of certain people to compromise. For example see [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation\/Northern Ireland flag usage#The current state of this mediation]] which has failed to produce a result, due in part to unwillingness of some parties to compromise. If parties only seek to use the process to force through their preferred version, it's an abuse of the process and Wikipedia in general. Thanks. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :As I said, I consider it pointless to continue with the mediation. Even taking it to MEDCOM will probably be a waste of time with the current unwillingness of certain people to compromise. For example see [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Northern Ireland flag usage#The current state of this mediation]] which has failed to produce a result, due in part to unwillingness of some parties to compromise. If parties only seek to use the process to force through their preferred version, it's an abuse of the process and Wikipedia in general. Thanks. <font face="Verdana">[[User:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">One Night In Hackney</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:One Night In Hackney|<span style="color:#006600">303</span>]]''</sub></font> 21:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

280021 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-20 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.187601240E09 +++$+++ You voted not to hear it because there was no RFC.  An RFC was opened and it has just been closed [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Chrisjnelson]]. I hope that this will allow the ArbCom to take this up. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ You voted not to hear it because there was no RFC.  An RFC was opened and it has just been closed [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Chrisjnelson]]. I hope that this will allow the ArbCom to take this up. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 02:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
280022 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280021 +++$+++ 280021 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.187601840E09 +++$+++ At the time of my post [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/Chrisjnelson&diff=prev&oldid=152374272 this] edit had not been made. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :At the time of my post [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Chrisjnelson&diff=prev&oldid=152374272 this] edit had not been made. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 02:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

542167 +++$+++ Tonywalton +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-30 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.196493300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reverting [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:R\/EFD&diff=174940331&oldid=174939817] - that was actually me, unlogged in. OK if I re-revert?  +++$+++ Thanks for reverting [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:R/EFD&diff=174940331&oldid=174939817] - that was actually me, unlogged in. OK if I re-revert? [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 23:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
542168 +++$+++ Tonywalton +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542167 +++$+++ 542167 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.196494320E09 +++$+++ Thanks. My ALL IN CAPITALS message (and yes, the edit ref I gave saying that I'm a fag and should be killed was a real one) was, it, seems, all too apparently a VANDIL edit. It just goes to show though that there's a positive side to WP.  Thanks for looking out for attacks!  +++$+++ :Thanks. My ALL IN CAPITALS message (and yes, the edit ref I gave saying that I'm a fag and should be killed was a real one) was, it, seems, all too apparently a VANDIL edit. It just goes to show though that there's a positive side to WP.  Thanks for looking out for attacks! [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 23:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

17881 +++$+++ Yoninah +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-03 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.299195540E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Seara (newspaper)]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Seara (newspaper)|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Seara (newspaper)]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Seara (newspaper)|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 15:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
17882 +++$+++ Yoninah +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17881 +++$+++ 17881 +++$+++ 2011-03-03 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.299195540E09 +++$+++ Please see new note on DYK talk page. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Please see new note on DYK talk page. Thanks, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 15:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

280027 +++$+++ FT2 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-27 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.188247440E09 +++$+++ Let me know when it arrives - thanks!  +++$+++ Let me know when it arrives - thanks! [[user:FT2|FT2]] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]])</span></sup> 13:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
280028 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280027 +++$+++ 280027 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.188257520E09 +++$+++ I've got it.  +++$+++ :I've got it. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
280029 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280027 +++$+++ 280027 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.188449400E09 +++$+++ What they don't have the \"June Sep\" month where you live? :-P  +++$+++ :What they don't have the "June Sep" month where you live? :-P [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

17885 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-12 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.299944400E09 +++$+++ If I may ask for a couple more notability checks while we're at it: [[Adrian O\u0163oiu]] and [[Constantin Virgil Banescu]]. And what about [[Circassians in Romania]]? You'll love this: we're told two individuals declared as Circassians in 2002, one of them in Piatra-Olt. We're linked to a page showing that town had one person of \"other ethnicity\" at the census. And [[User:Danielimfinity|the author]]? \"I am a Circassian. I live in Romania, in Piatra Olt\"! (No word on how he deduced the other Circassian lives in [[Meri\u015fani]].) -  +++$+++ If I may ask for a couple more notability checks while we're at it: [[Adrian Oţoiu]] and [[Constantin Virgil Banescu]]. And what about [[Circassians in Romania]]? You'll love this: we're told two individuals declared as Circassians in 2002, one of them in Piatra-Olt. We're linked to a page showing that town had one person of "other ethnicity" at the census. And [[User:Danielimfinity|the author]]? "I am a Circassian. I live in Romania, in Piatra Olt"! (No word on how he deduced the other Circassian lives in [[Merişani]].) - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 07:40, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
17886 +++$+++ Anonimu +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17885 +++$+++ 17885 +++$+++ 2011-03-12 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.299978960E09 +++$+++ About the diacritics: as long [[Operating_system_usage|40% of Internet users]] use an [[Windows XP|operating system]] that [[S-comma|doesn't natively]] [[T-comma|support]] those letters, I strongly disagree with a universal move from t\/s-cedilla towards t\/s-comma. While on ro.wp we can assume most readers installed the necessary software, this isn't the case for the international readership of en.wp. And a t\/s-cedilla is always better than a blank square. +++$+++ :About the diacritics: as long [[Operating_system_usage|40% of Internet users]] use an [[Windows XP|operating system]] that [[S-comma|doesn't natively]] [[T-comma|support]] those letters, I strongly disagree with a universal move from t/s-cedilla towards t/s-comma. While on ro.wp we can assume most readers installed the necessary software, this isn't the case for the international readership of en.wp. And a t/s-cedilla is always better than a blank square.[[User:Anonimu|Anonimu]] ([[User talk:Anonimu|talk]]) 17:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
17887 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17885 +++$+++ 17886 +++$+++ 2011-03-12 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.299979440E09 +++$+++ Friends, my main objection, I must confess, is that I just don't like the cedilla system: as I have said in the past, the letters display like they're scribbled by idiotic children in between regular letters. I also hate inconsistency (notice how those guys moving the articles don't even seem to register that the \"incorrect\" diacritics are still used in the body of text - \"let someone else do it\"...). Either way, though, I would accept any single outcome, as long as it is ''a single'' outcome, in clear letters, that we all may follow, and as long as the changes are applied with at least some consistency and responsibility.  +++$+++ ::Friends, my main objection, I must confess, is that I just don't like the cedilla system: as I have said in the past, the letters display like they're scribbled by idiotic children in between regular letters. I also hate inconsistency (notice how those guys moving the articles don't even seem to register that the "incorrect" diacritics are still used in the body of text - "let someone else do it"...). Either way, though, I would accept any single outcome, as long as it is ''a single'' outcome, in clear letters, that we all may follow, and as long as the changes are applied with at least some consistency and responsibility. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn#top|talk]]) 17:24, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

280031 +++$+++ PaulTanenbaum +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-17 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.190014740E09 +++$+++ If you wish to reply, please hit my talk page.\u2014 +++$+++ If you wish to reply, please hit my talk page.—[[User:PaulTanenbaum|PaulTanenbaum]] 00:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
280032 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280031 +++$+++ 280031 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.190080320E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. I'm fine with your proposed change above. I'm aware of other views about the empty set but I don't think we need to address them in the \"set\" article. As an aside though, I can't help thinking that every Beatle who is in the set {Ringo} \/ {Ringo} is also an integer whose square is 2, and ''vice versa''.  +++$+++ :Hi Paul. I'm fine with your proposed change above. I'm aware of other views about the empty set but I don't think we need to address them in the "set" article. As an aside though, I can't help thinking that every Beatle who is in the set {Ringo} / {Ringo} is also an integer whose square is 2, and ''vice versa''. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:52, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
280033 +++$+++ PaulTanenbaum +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280031 +++$+++ 280032 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.190112780E09 +++$+++ No, that certainly is ''not'' a rat hole we need to go down in the \"set\" article.  And I quite like your observation that no such Beatle fails to be such an integer.  When my connection becomes more reliable, I'll make the change we've agreed on.  Regards\u2014 +++$+++ ::No, that certainly is ''not'' a rat hole we need to go down in the "set" article.  And I quite like your observation that no such Beatle fails to be such an integer.  When my connection becomes more reliable, I'll make the change we've agreed on.  Regards—[[User:PaulTanenbaum|PaulTanenbaum]] 03:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

17888 +++$+++ Codrinb +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17888 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-15 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.300220580E09 +++$+++ Can you enlighten me about the removal of DYK tag from Ziridava?! Thanks -- +++$+++ Can you enlighten me about the removal of DYK tag from Ziridava?! Thanks --[[User:Codrinb|Codrin.B]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 13:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
17889 +++$+++ Codrinb +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17888 +++$+++ 17888 +++$+++ 2011-03-15 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.300221720E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I missed the part with where to post the template... The helmet article is a bit late, but I was encouraged to DYK it anyway. I think is worth it. Any other suggestions, constructive criticism? Regards -- +++$+++ : Thanks! I missed the part with where to post the template... The helmet article is a bit late, but I was encouraged to DYK it anyway. I think is worth it. Any other suggestions, constructive criticism? Regards --[[User:Codrinb|Codrin.B]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 13:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
17890 +++$+++ Codrinb +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17888 +++$+++ 17889 +++$+++ 2011-03-15 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.300222620E09 +++$+++ Sure, looking forward for your review, as long as ... you don't kill me! LOL! The Helmet article needs more work, I already know that as I wasn't done with it. It was just a start level. But I decided to put it there because of the time constraints that the DYK seems to require. And because I really think is an amazing helmet. I wanted to keep it \"offline\" and work on it, but it seems to be too late after your create the article right? Ziridava is in better shape, although there is more content to add and working with archaeologists to get pictures but takes forever. Is it a good idea to use your user space or a draft space to build the article and then move it to main space before DYK, so you have time and don't hit the time constraints? Thanks -- +++$+++ :: Sure, looking forward for your review, as long as ... you don't kill me! LOL! The Helmet article needs more work, I already know that as I wasn't done with it. It was just a start level. But I decided to put it there because of the time constraints that the DYK seems to require. And because I really think is an amazing helmet. I wanted to keep it "offline" and work on it, but it seems to be too late after your create the article right? Ziridava is in better shape, although there is more content to add and working with archaeologists to get pictures but takes forever. Is it a good idea to use your user space or a draft space to build the article and then move it to main space before DYK, so you have time and don't hit the time constraints? Thanks --[[User:Codrinb|Codrin.B]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 13:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

280034 +++$+++ Liempt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.190247060E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, I don't take any offense.  I was actually just about to send you a message regarding my addition of a small section to the talk page of \"set\".  I also replied to both your and revolver's statements in the if vs if and only if section of the same page.  I had recently noticed wikiproject mathematics and was intending to join, so thanks for confirming my interest.  Also, please do note that those definitions weren't intended to be completely formal, just relatively formal by comparision to the amount of sophistication I noticed.  Sincerely,  +++$+++ Don't worry, I don't take any offense.  I was actually just about to send you a message regarding my addition of a small section to the talk page of "set".  I also replied to both your and revolver's statements in the if vs if and only if section of the same page.  I had recently noticed wikiproject mathematics and was intending to join, so thanks for confirming my interest.  Also, please do note that those definitions weren't intended to be completely formal, just relatively formal by comparision to the amount of sophistication I noticed.  Sincerely, [[User:Liempt|Liempt]] 17:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
280035 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280034 +++$+++ 280034 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.190247540E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I will reply on [[talk:set]], with my views.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I will reply on [[talk:set]], with my views. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

17891 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17891 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-21 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.300691040E09 +++$+++ }}  [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 00:04, 21 March 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ }}  [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 00:04, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
17892 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17891 +++$+++ 17891 +++$+++ 2011-03-21 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.300721280E09 +++$+++ He is now featured on [[Portal:Germany]]. If you have more DYK related to Germany, feel free to place it there yourself. -- +++$+++ :He is now featured on [[Portal:Germany]]. If you have more DYK related to Germany, feel free to place it there yourself. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 08:28, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

280036 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280036 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-27 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.190896560E09 +++$+++ Paul, I want to apologize for the comments I made about you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FAttack_sites%2FProposed_decision&diff=160635873&oldid=160635306 here], which I've struck out. They were too strongly worded, unfair, and inappropriate for a public page. I disagree with you about these issues, and I'll probably continue to disagree, but I accept you're struggling to make sense of complex problems that so far no one has produced a perfect solution for. The way we'll reach that solution is by exchanging views in good faith, and comments like mine today don't help that process. I'm sorry. <font color=\"Purple\"> +++$+++ Paul, I want to apologize for the comments I made about you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FAttack_sites%2FProposed_decision&diff=160635873&oldid=160635306 here], which I've struck out. They were too strongly worded, unfair, and inappropriate for a public page. I disagree with you about these issues, and I'll probably continue to disagree, but I accept you're struggling to make sense of complex problems that so far no one has produced a perfect solution for. The way we'll reach that solution is by exchanging views in good faith, and comments like mine today don't help that process. I'm sorry. <font color="Purple">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 05:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
280037 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280036 +++$+++ 280036 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.190952060E09 +++$+++ Thanks Slim. I appreciate your comments. No hard feelings here. Disagreement is appropriate and welcome. Heaven knows I am often wrong. My concern in all this is only for the well being of the encyclopedia. There are tradeoffs involved here and it is not easy to determine the right balance between conflicting goods. I am certainly not arrogant enough to think I know the answer.  +++$+++ :Thanks Slim. I appreciate your comments. No hard feelings here. Disagreement is appropriate and welcome. Heaven knows I am often wrong. My concern in all this is only for the well being of the encyclopedia. There are tradeoffs involved here and it is not easy to determine the right balance between conflicting goods. I am certainly not arrogant enough to think I know the answer. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:01, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

17893 +++$+++ AdiJapan +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-21 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.300733220E09 +++$+++ On a different note, following your encouragement, I started working on a series of articles on the Romanian subdialects (see [[Special:Contributions\/AdiJapan]]). I had to stop when the earthquake hit us, but I will go on. I wanted to thank you for stimulating me. \u2014  +++$+++ On a different note, following your encouragement, I started working on a series of articles on the Romanian subdialects (see [[Special:Contributions/AdiJapan]]). I had to stop when the earthquake hit us, but I will go on. I wanted to thank you for stimulating me. — [[User:AdiJapan|<font color="#048">'''Adi'''</font>]][[User Talk:AdiJapan|<font color="#37B">Japan</font>]] 11:47, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
17894 +++$+++ AdiJapan +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17893 +++$+++ 17893 +++$+++ 2011-03-21 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.300742160E09 +++$+++ No, you don't have anything to apologize for. Anyway, everyone I know here is well, and so am I. I'm sorry if I made you worry. \u2014  +++$+++ :No, you don't have anything to apologize for. Anyway, everyone I know here is well, and so am I. I'm sorry if I made you worry. — [[User:AdiJapan|<font color="#048">'''Adi'''</font>]][[User Talk:AdiJapan|<font color="#37B">Japan</font>]] 14:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

280038 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-27 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.190958960E09 +++$+++ After all, we do need something. -- +++$+++ After all, we do need something. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 22:56, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
280039 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280038 +++$+++ 280038 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.190967900E09 +++$+++ Still thinking. What do you suggest?  +++$+++ :Still thinking. What do you suggest? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 01:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
280040 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280038 +++$+++ 280039 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.191019500E09 +++$+++ I like most of [[Wikipedia_talk:Linking_to_external_harassment#Newyorkbrad.27s_proposal_from_the_ArbCom_case|Newyorkbrad's proposal]], and think it can get wide support. It was removed as proposing a policy, which Arbcom doesn't do, but Alecmconroy did a good job of [[Wikipedia_talk:Linking_to_external_harassment#How_to_build_the_original_New_York_Brad_proposal_using_things_found_around_the_project |showing how much of it can be justified by existing policy]], which Arbcom certainly does do. Please take a look, and see how much of that you can snarf. (Erm, sorry. You're a mathematician. [http:\/\/www.guntheranderson.com\/v\/data\/lobachev.htm \"... be sure always to call it please, 'research'.\"] :-)) -- +++$+++ :: I like most of [[Wikipedia_talk:Linking_to_external_harassment#Newyorkbrad.27s_proposal_from_the_ArbCom_case|Newyorkbrad's proposal]], and think it can get wide support. It was removed as proposing a policy, which Arbcom doesn't do, but Alecmconroy did a good job of [[Wikipedia_talk:Linking_to_external_harassment#How_to_build_the_original_New_York_Brad_proposal_using_things_found_around_the_project |showing how much of it can be justified by existing policy]], which Arbcom certainly does do. Please take a look, and see how much of that you can snarf. (Erm, sorry. You're a mathematician. [http://www.guntheranderson.com/v/data/lobachev.htm "... be sure always to call it please, 'research'."] :-)) --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
280041 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280038 +++$+++ 280040 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.191020640E09 +++$+++ \"Newyorkbrad's proposal\" didn't really address the question of whether there is a small handful of sites (the canonical example being the site at issue in the original MONGO case) that are so very problematic that they shouldn't be linked to at all. But as I noted on the talkpage of the proposed decision, I've cross-posted my thoughts to a policy discussion page for discussion there if people want to use them as a starting point for anything.  +++$+++ :::"Newyorkbrad's proposal" didn't really address the question of whether there is a small handful of sites (the canonical example being the site at issue in the original MONGO case) that are so very problematic that they shouldn't be linked to at all. But as I noted on the talkpage of the proposed decision, I've cross-posted my thoughts to a policy discussion page for discussion there if people want to use them as a starting point for anything. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 16:04, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
280042 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280038 +++$+++ 280041 +++$+++ 2007-09-28 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.191021660E09 +++$+++ I think we can't and shouldn't make a specific ''never'' rule, because it depends on the notability of the site, which can change. There certainly are sites, like the canonical one, we should never link to ''now''; but that is fortunately because it is not notable enough. We do link to [[Wikipedia Watch]], which is pretty clearly an attack site, however has gotten substantial press. (And has been the result of the poorly thought out [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Daniel Brandt (14th nomination)|Daniel Brandt deletion]], but spilt milk.) Should the canonical site get non-trivial coverage by multiple reliable sources, we'll link to it. We'll interpret [[Wikipedia:Notability]] as strictly as we can, of course, we aren't masochists, but we are an encyclopedia first, and a community only second. But we shouldn't say that in this official decision, because ... [[WP:BEANS]] if nothing else. Nyb's proposal describing that we shouldn't link to attack pages, and should discourage linking to attack sites (though it doesn't quite use those words, since he's smarter than I am), does cover both those cases sufficiently. As I complained, it doesn't completely cover the notable-site-with-front-page-attack case, but I don't have any good ideas for that myself. The perfect is the enemy of the good, and Nyb's proposal is a lot better than nothing. <small>By the way, I keep having thoughts of drafting Nyb for arbcom half a year early; or at least blocking anyone who opposes his nomination at the proper time as a blatant vandal... :-)<\/small>-- +++$+++ :::: I think we can't and shouldn't make a specific ''never'' rule, because it depends on the notability of the site, which can change. There certainly are sites, like the canonical one, we should never link to ''now''; but that is fortunately because it is not notable enough. We do link to [[Wikipedia Watch]], which is pretty clearly an attack site, however has gotten substantial press. (And has been the result of the poorly thought out [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Brandt (14th nomination)|Daniel Brandt deletion]], but spilt milk.) Should the canonical site get non-trivial coverage by multiple reliable sources, we'll link to it. We'll interpret [[Wikipedia:Notability]] as strictly as we can, of course, we aren't masochists, but we are an encyclopedia first, and a community only second. But we shouldn't say that in this official decision, because ... [[WP:BEANS]] if nothing else. Nyb's proposal describing that we shouldn't link to attack pages, and should discourage linking to attack sites (though it doesn't quite use those words, since he's smarter than I am), does cover both those cases sufficiently. As I complained, it doesn't completely cover the notable-site-with-front-page-attack case, but I don't have any good ideas for that myself. The perfect is the enemy of the good, and Nyb's proposal is a lot better than nothing. <small>By the way, I keep having thoughts of drafting Nyb for arbcom half a year early; or at least blocking anyone who opposes his nomination at the proper time as a blatant vandal... :-)</small>--[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
280043 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280038 +++$+++ 280041 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.191367920E09 +++$+++ <small>and you seem somewhat less likely to block me indefinitely for suggesting than a few other arbcommers. :-)<\/small>-- +++$+++ :::* <small>and you seem somewhat less likely to block me indefinitely for suggesting than a few other arbcommers. :-)</small>--[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
280044 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280038 +++$+++ 280041 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.191372480E09 +++$+++ What do you think of the alternatives to \"Malicious sites\" proposed by Kirill, as principle 15.1 on the Proposed decision page, or the alternative proposed by Alecmconroy [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration\/Attack sites\/Proposed decision#Proposed alternative to MALICIOUSSITES|here]]?  +++$+++ ::::What do you think of the alternatives to "Malicious sites" proposed by Kirill, as principle 15.1 on the Proposed decision page, or the alternative proposed by Alecmconroy [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Attack sites/Proposed decision#Proposed alternative to MALICIOUSSITES|here]]? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

17897 +++$+++ CaroleHenson +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17897 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-22 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.300850100E09 +++$+++ Dahn, we're good.  Thank you for the comments that made the article better, I have no quarrel with them.  I have no concern about the other material that I'll read tonight, I'm sure that you're right and that it will be helpful.  About the other comments on\/after the approval of the DYK, you have given me a good laugh.  I am ready to \"stick a fork\" in this topic, because I think it's done.  Don't you?-- +++$+++ Dahn, we're good.  Thank you for the comments that made the article better, I have no quarrel with them.  I have no concern about the other material that I'll read tonight, I'm sure that you're right and that it will be helpful.  About the other comments on/after the approval of the DYK, you have given me a good laugh.  I am ready to "stick a fork" in this topic, because I think it's done.  Don't you?--[[User:CaroleHenson|CaroleHenson]] ([[User talk:CaroleHenson|talk]]) 20:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
17898 +++$+++ CaroleHenson +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17897 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.300919580E09 +++$+++ I posted a response to your comments on my talk page.  I hope that it will be clearer what I appreciate about the learnings from you and that I agree that I'm sensitive.  I apologize for my portion of the effort that got this ramped up into a dither.  I hope we can both walk away feeling like we learned a little something - and return to a calmer state.  Thanks for all the guidance that you gave me that I'll take away.-- +++$+++ ::I posted a response to your comments on my talk page.  I hope that it will be clearer what I appreciate about the learnings from you and that I agree that I'm sensitive.  I apologize for my portion of the effort that got this ramped up into a dither.  I hope we can both walk away feeling like we learned a little something - and return to a calmer state.  Thanks for all the guidance that you gave me that I'll take away.--[[User:CaroleHenson|CaroleHenson]] ([[User talk:CaroleHenson|talk]]) 15:33, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

542186 +++$+++ elcobbola +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-07 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.197030540E09 +++$+++ The GA nomination of [[Waffentr\xe4ger]] has been placed on hold.  Please see comments on the talk page and feel free to let me know if you have questions.  +++$+++ The GA nomination of [[Waffenträger]] has been placed on hold.  Please see comments on the talk page and feel free to let me know if you have questions. [[User:elcobbola|<font color="black">'''Ɛƚ'''</font><font color="red">'''ƈơƅƅ'''</font><font color="orange">'''ơƚɑ'''</font>]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User talk:elcobbola|talk]]</sub> 04:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
542187 +++$+++ elcobbola +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542186 +++$+++ 542186 +++$+++ 2007-12-08 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.197158760E09 +++$+++ I replied on my talk page to keep the conversation in one place.  If you want to go back and forth between pages going forward, that\u2019s ok, too.  +++$+++ :I replied on my talk page to keep the conversation in one place.  If you want to go back and forth between pages going forward, that’s ok, too. [[User:elcobbola|<font color="black">'''Ɛƚ'''</font><font color="red">'''ƈơƅƅ'''</font><font color="orange">'''ơƚɑ'''</font>]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User talk:elcobbola|talk]]</sub> 16:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
542188 +++$+++ elcobbola +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542186 +++$+++ 542187 +++$+++ 2007-12-11 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.197367980E09 +++$+++ <s>Toaster<\/s> GA it is!  +++$+++ ::<s>Toaster</s> GA it is! [[User:elcobbola|<font color="black">'''Ɛƚ'''</font><font color="red">'''ƈơƅƅ'''</font><font color="orange">'''ơƚɑ'''</font>]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User talk:elcobbola|talk]]</sub> 02:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

527271 +++$+++ Dravecky +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-18 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.240047480E09 +++$+++ |}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom -->   +++$+++ |}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom -->  [[User:Dravecky|Dravecky]] ([[User talk:Dravecky|talk]]) 02:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
527272 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527271 +++$+++ 527271 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.240817760E09 +++$+++ Attention my fellow comrades. User:Chrisrus, has provided us with the site: (http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=z2PUgDa1jy4) in which Arthur is supposed to have stated (I say \"supposed\" only because my internet connection is so slow that I haven't looked at it) that she was never a member of the United States Marine Corps. We \"must\" look into this because if it true then her name must be removed from the [[List of U.S. Marines]]. Please take a look and make [[Talk:List of U.S. Marines#Bea Arthur Part2|recommendations]].  +++$+++ *Attention my fellow comrades. User:Chrisrus, has provided us with the site: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2PUgDa1jy4) in which Arthur is supposed to have stated (I say "supposed" only because my internet connection is so slow that I haven't looked at it) that she was never a member of the United States Marine Corps. We "must" look into this because if it true then her name must be removed from the [[List of U.S. Marines]]. Please take a look and make [[Talk:List of U.S. Marines#Bea Arthur Part2|recommendations]]. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 00:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
527273 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527271 +++$+++ 527271 +++$+++ 2009-04-28 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.240914960E09 +++$+++ You've made a really good point. It seems as if Bea has always been a tough subject in regard to her USMC sevice, only if she would come out and strighten things out. Right now there is discussion going on the article's (Bea's) talk page about that. In regard to the list, I am not going to act on it, but I think that our other comrades will also agree with your observation once they read it.  +++$+++ :You've made a really good point. It seems as if Bea has always been a tough subject in regard to her USMC sevice, only if she would come out and strighten things out. Right now there is discussion going on the article's (Bea's) talk page about that. In regard to the list, I am not going to act on it, but I think that our other comrades will also agree with your observation once they read it. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 03:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

17900 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17900 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-26 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.301188080E09 +++$+++ hi, I've begun expanding this. I wondered if you could help out. [http:\/\/vestea.wordpress.com\/istorie-prin-evenimente-si-chipuri\/i-bacilamehadia-participanta-activa-la-actul-de-la-1-decembrie-1918\/ this] has some info in Romanian]. I've also invited one or two of my usual companions to help expand it.\u2666  +++$+++ hi, I've begun expanding this. I wondered if you could help out. [http://vestea.wordpress.com/istorie-prin-evenimente-si-chipuri/i-bacilamehadia-participanta-activa-la-actul-de-la-1-decembrie-1918/ this] has some info in Romanian]. I've also invited one or two of my usual companions to help expand it.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 18:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
17901 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17900 +++$+++ 17900 +++$+++ 2011-03-27 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.301233320E09 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld, may I make a suggestion? Since we include mention of Romanian villages at the parent commune article, rather than splitting them up arbitrarily, I'd encourage you to add in information on Globur\u0103u, Plugova and Valea Bolva\u015fni\u0163a villages. As an example of how to approach this, look no further than Dahn's own article on the somewhat nearby [[Coronini]]. -  +++$+++ :Dr. Blofeld, may I make a suggestion? Since we include mention of Romanian villages at the parent commune article, rather than splitting them up arbitrarily, I'd encourage you to add in information on Globurău, Plugova and Valea Bolvaşniţa villages. As an example of how to approach this, look no further than Dahn's own article on the somewhat nearby [[Coronini]]. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 06:42, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
17902 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17900 +++$+++ 17901 +++$+++ 2011-03-27 09:39:00 +++$+++ 1.301243940E09 +++$+++ Dear doctor, I have a lot on my plate at this stage, but I would sure like to help. In the meantime, I stand by Biruitorul's point (obviously): it is a good benchmark not to link\/create articles on villages which are nowadays nothing more than the neighborhoods of a commune (all the info on them can be folded in the commune article, without the redundancies or irrelevancies that the alternative always creates).  +++$+++ ::Dear doctor, I have a lot on my plate at this stage, but I would sure like to help. In the meantime, I stand by Biruitorul's point (obviously): it is a good benchmark not to link/create articles on villages which are nowadays nothing more than the neighborhoods of a commune (all the info on them can be folded in the commune article, without the redundancies or irrelevancies that the alternative always creates). [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn#top|talk]]) 09:39, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

280045 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280045 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-02 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.191373500E09 +++$+++ That specific section of WP:BLP contains wonderful language, such as \"Real people are involved, and they can be hurt by your words.\" and \"do no harm\" and \"including every detail can lead to problems, even when the material is well-sourced\". Incorporating all that by reference is exactly what we want. -- +++$+++ That specific section of WP:BLP contains wonderful language, such as "Real people are involved, and they can be hurt by your words." and "do no harm" and "including every detail can lead to problems, even when the material is well-sourced". Incorporating all that by reference is exactly what we want. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 18:05, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
280046 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280045 +++$+++ 280045 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.191384300E09 +++$+++ I've now proposed 15.2.  +++$+++ :I've now proposed 15.2. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:05, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
280047 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280045 +++$+++ 280046 +++$+++ 2007-10-02 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.191385020E09 +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|43px|left|WikiThanks]]! -- +++$+++ ::[[Image:WikiThanks.png|43px|left|WikiThanks]]! --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 21:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

17903 +++$+++ Hobartimus +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-29 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.301450400E09 +++$+++ I feel the community should severely cut down on that article to the point of possibly stubifying. Not only for reasons well explained in the Afd, but at closer examination The creator has not a ''single'' contribution to Wikipedia that is not Boros related somehow. His conduct was pretty horrible at the Afd as well with canvassing in an unacceptable fashion etc. There is clearly a problem here that needs addressing.  +++$+++ I feel the community should severely cut down on that article to the point of possibly stubifying. Not only for reasons well explained in the Afd, but at closer examination The creator has not a ''single'' contribution to Wikipedia that is not Boros related somehow. His conduct was pretty horrible at the Afd as well with canvassing in an unacceptable fashion etc. There is clearly a problem here that needs addressing. [[User:Hobartimus|Hobartimus]] ([[User talk:Hobartimus|talk]]) 19:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
17904 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17903 +++$+++ 17903 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.301529540E09 +++$+++ To be fair, he did make an edit to [[Dualism]]... But yes, perhaps you could also persuade others that this is not a Romanians v Hungarians issue. Like Biruitorul below, I'm quite done with Mr. Boros' case for a while - there is a chronic wikideficit of common sense that blows into Hangakiran's sails at the moment.  +++$+++ :To be fair, he did make an edit to [[Dualism]]... But yes, perhaps you could also persuade others that this is not a Romanians v Hungarians issue. Like Biruitorul below, I'm quite done with Mr. Boros' case for a while - there is a chronic wikideficit of common sense that blows into Hangakiran's sails at the moment. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn#top|talk]]) 16:59, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

280048 +++$+++ Gilisa +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.191850920E09 +++$+++ I saw that you made a deletion on my talk page (you deleted the belittling title that one anonymous coward user add to my talk page ,btw, I have a guess who it was). I cant remember that I ask you (or any body else) to do so-don\u2019t do it again.-- +++$+++ I saw that you made a deletion on my talk page (you deleted the belittling title that one anonymous coward user add to my talk page ,btw, I have a guess who it was). I cant remember that I ask you (or any body else) to do so-don’t do it again.--[[User:Gilisa|Gilisa]] 06:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
280049 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280048 +++$+++ 280048 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.191878160E09 +++$+++ OK.  +++$+++ :OK. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

17905 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17905 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-30 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.301488380E09 +++$+++ I appreciate that extra bit on the Witnesses, and allow me to peer into the crystal ball by asking: is there any prospect that Rebreanu will be plunged into the cooker at some point? I'd sure like to see that. -  +++$+++ I appreciate that extra bit on the Witnesses, and allow me to peer into the crystal ball by asking: is there any prospect that Rebreanu will be plunged into the cooker at some point? I'd sure like to see that. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 05:33, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
17906 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17905 +++$+++ 17905 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.301529540E09 +++$+++ Rebreanu is definitely on my list, but I'm not sure where and when. I mean, the list also includes (beyond Iorga) Maiorescu (remember the botched stubification?) and perhaps Lovinescu. But now that you mentioned it, I'm already getting excited about expanding Rebreanu as well - his mysterious death, his weird changes of political position, his tailoring of his his own youth... all kewl stuff. I just have to get over my Symbolist obsession before I give it a chance.  +++$+++ :Rebreanu is definitely on my list, but I'm not sure where and when. I mean, the list also includes (beyond Iorga) Maiorescu (remember the botched stubification?) and perhaps Lovinescu. But now that you mentioned it, I'm already getting excited about expanding Rebreanu as well - his mysterious death, his weird changes of political position, his tailoring of his his own youth... all kewl stuff. I just have to get over my Symbolist obsession before I give it a chance. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn#top|talk]]) 16:59, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
17907 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17905 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.301674320E09 +++$+++ If there ever was any stupidly unrealistic law in Romania, it the panorama thing - with over half of our urban landscape reshaped in the past 50 years by teams of anonymous, uncreditable or shameful architects. It is an interesting survivals of the forms without substance, and it is something to consider campaigning against, vigorously. Lovely stuff on the streets, btw - Bistri\u0163a is a city of heroes (which Carol, btw? and how did they call in Austro-Hungarian days?). I might add that, whatever the point of changing street names in Szekler areas, it really was a case of insolence to make Hungarians walk down a Mihai Eminescu Street.  +++$+++ :::If there ever was any stupidly unrealistic law in Romania, it the panorama thing - with over half of our urban landscape reshaped in the past 50 years by teams of anonymous, uncreditable or shameful architects. It is an interesting survivals of the forms without substance, and it is something to consider campaigning against, vigorously. Lovely stuff on the streets, btw - Bistriţa is a city of heroes (which Carol, btw? and how did they call in Austro-Hungarian days?). I might add that, whatever the point of changing street names in Szekler areas, it really was a case of insolence to make Hungarians walk down a Mihai Eminescu Street. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn#top|talk]]) 09:12, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
17908 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17905 +++$+++ 17906 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.301574780E09 +++$+++ An [[Karl Marx|old friend of ours]] has reached GA status. I haven't looked at it in detail, but a couple of things jumped out. First, under the \"influenced\" section in the infobox, if I had to pick one Romanian influenced by Marx, it probably wouldn't be a man with a fourth-grade education. (Also, why is the current president of Cyprus there? I know he's a Communist, but they might as well put down Vladimir Voronin too.) Second, [[Karl_Marx#Personal_life|over here]], must we really say that \"Marx was heterosexual\"? Given that he married and had seven children, and that he was not a married homosexual (in the vein of Oscar Wilde), and given that no other biography I've seen here states this explicitly, it does seem like overkill. (Speaking, of course, as a reactionary [[heteronormativity|heteronormativist]].) -  +++$+++ ::An [[Karl Marx|old friend of ours]] has reached GA status. I haven't looked at it in detail, but a couple of things jumped out. First, under the "influenced" section in the infobox, if I had to pick one Romanian influenced by Marx, it probably wouldn't be a man with a fourth-grade education. (Also, why is the current president of Cyprus there? I know he's a Communist, but they might as well put down Vladimir Voronin too.) Second, [[Karl_Marx#Personal_life|over here]], must we really say that "Marx was heterosexual"? Given that he married and had seven children, and that he was not a married homosexual (in the vein of Oscar Wilde), and given that no other biography I've seen here states this explicitly, it does seem like overkill. (Speaking, of course, as a reactionary [[heteronormativity|heteronormativist]].) - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 05:33, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
17909 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17905 +++$+++ 17908 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.301674320E09 +++$+++ Why I hold no hope for the \"star\" articles. Forget Ceau\u015fescu, but it seems like virtually none of the people cited there represent his intellectual legacy - not that I'm dying to put up Dobrogeanu-Gherea, but even Lagardelle and Lafargue are more relevant than Gorbachev in that succession. And the \"heterosexual\" stuff is not just insanely disclaimer-like (it probably records who \"won\" a wikipedia debate in the background), but it laughs in the face of very serious researchers of Marx's biography, whose verdicts deserve at least a mention. It's not something I have ever researched in any detail, but Paul Johnson's ''Intellectuals'' makes ample mention of Marx's sexual hypocrisy - even if it's speculation or folkore, it's out there. Downward trajectory? Downward spiral!  +++$+++ :::Why I hold no hope for the "star" articles. Forget Ceauşescu, but it seems like virtually none of the people cited there represent his intellectual legacy - not that I'm dying to put up Dobrogeanu-Gherea, but even Lagardelle and Lafargue are more relevant than Gorbachev in that succession. And the "heterosexual" stuff is not just insanely disclaimer-like (it probably records who "won" a wikipedia debate in the background), but it laughs in the face of very serious researchers of Marx's biography, whose verdicts deserve at least a mention. It's not something I have ever researched in any detail, but Paul Johnson's ''Intellectuals'' makes ample mention of Marx's sexual hypocrisy - even if it's speculation or folkore, it's out there. Downward trajectory? Downward spiral! [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn#top|talk]]) 09:12, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
17910 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17905 +++$+++ 17905 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.301456760E09 +++$+++ Hi Dahn, just a note to let you know that you are being discussed on a noticeboard. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Rudeness_and_hounding_in_discussion]--<span style=\"font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Hi Dahn, just a note to let you know that you are being discussed on a noticeboard. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Rudeness_and_hounding_in_discussion]--<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — [[User:Keithbob|<b style= "color:#090;"><i>Keithbob</i></b>]] • [[User_ talk:Keithbob|<span style="color:#075;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 20:46, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

280050 +++$+++ Monsieurdl +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.191890100E09 +++$+++ I was in the process of adding a map with each site when you brought back the satellite map. The info box along with a professional-looking map really enhances every article dealing with Ancient Greek cities in Asia Minor, as other examples that I provided. I haven't removed a single picture in my revisions except for that one because a Wiki map in unison with a large photo in an infobox gives you everything you want to know at a glance. I understand it was your photo, but I am trying to improve all of the articles so don't take it personally :) +++$+++ I was in the process of adding a map with each site when you brought back the satellite map. The info box along with a professional-looking map really enhances every article dealing with Ancient Greek cities in Asia Minor, as other examples that I provided. I haven't removed a single picture in my revisions except for that one because a Wiki map in unison with a large photo in an infobox gives you everything you want to know at a glance. I understand it was your photo, but I am trying to improve all of the articles so don't take it personally :)[[User:Monsieurdl|Monsieurdl]] 17:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
280051 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280050 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.191891240E09 +++$+++ Hi Monsieurdl. Well I don't like info boxes. However the satelite map is helpful since it is more detailed. I've added it back in the \"Geography\" section. If you disagree let's discuss this on the article's talk page. By the way It doesn't matter to me in the least that the image was \"mine\" ;-)  +++$+++ ::Hi Monsieurdl. Well I don't like info boxes. However the satelite map is helpful since it is more detailed. I've added it back in the "Geography" section. If you disagree let's discuss this on the article's talk page. By the way It doesn't matter to me in the least that the image was "mine" ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

280054 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-03 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.194133560E09 +++$+++ (Insert standard question here.)  +++$+++ (Insert standard question here.) [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 16:46, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
280055 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280054 +++$+++ 280054 +++$+++ 2007-11-03 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.194134940E09 +++$+++ (Insert standard answer here.)  +++$+++ :(Insert standard answer here.) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

17912 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-06 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.302155820E09 +++$+++ You did leave one obvious question unanswered: was he a smoker? Also: [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Deepside_Deejays|a strange argument]] regarding the video, don't you find? -  +++$+++ You did leave one obvious question unanswered: was he a smoker? Also: [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Deepside_Deejays|a strange argument]] regarding the video, don't you find? - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 22:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
17913 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17912 +++$+++ 17912 +++$+++ 2011-04-06 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.302156000E09 +++$+++ One the one: I think he was from a family of smokers :). On the other: yes, I noticed some of that even before I took up another Filotti, but I didn't want to wrap my head around it. I'll have a second look.  +++$+++ :One the one: I think he was from a family of smokers :). On the other: yes, I noticed some of that even before I took up another Filotti, but I didn't want to wrap my head around it. I'll have a second look. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn#top|talk]]) 23:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
17914 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17912 +++$+++ 17913 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.302174120E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I was going to ask: what about [[Cornel Mihai Ungureanu]] (not to be confused with [[Cornel Ungureanu]])? On the minus side, it's [[Special:Contributions\/Mariusdobrin|written by Marius Dobrin]], a [http:\/\/www.cornelmihaiungureanu.ro\/interviu.htm pal of his]. On the other hand, there are some reviews of his work, though I couldn't at first try find anything more broadly about him or his career. -  +++$+++ ::Anyway, I was going to ask: what about [[Cornel Mihai Ungureanu]] (not to be confused with [[Cornel Ungureanu]])? On the minus side, it's [[Special:Contributions/Mariusdobrin|written by Marius Dobrin]], a [http://www.cornelmihaiungureanu.ro/interviu.htm pal of his]. On the other hand, there are some reviews of his work, though I couldn't at first try find anything more broadly about him or his career. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 04:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
17915 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17912 +++$+++ 17914 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.302194220E09 +++$+++ Well, beyond the personal Filotti promotion\/Filotti vendetta, I must say that a couple of those articles are still notable ([[Nestor Ignat]], even though the text we now have on him is grotesque, and most of the \"info\" unretriavable). Same thing on the newspapers: possibly [[Sem\u0103n\u0103torul (1870\u20131876)]] and most certainly [[F\u0103t Frumos (magazine)]] are notable entries - the latter is thoroughly mentioned for instance by C\u0103linescu, who puts it in the same category of relevance as ''S\u0103m\u0103n\u0103torul'' and ''Luceaf\u0103rul''. That said, I'd definitely endorse a merger into the \"Media in\" entry for the rest, and maybe for all except ''F\u0103t Frumos''. On Ungureanu: ugh, it's an ugly article; but the reviews cited, as well as stuff like [http:\/\/www.observatorcultural.ro\/PROZA.-Cornel-Mihai-UNGUREANU-Pasii-sarpelui*articleID_8362-articles_details.html this], [http:\/\/www.romlit.ro\/prozator_bun_caut_ambiii this], [http:\/\/www.romlit.ro\/ntmplri_mrunte this] etc. do validate the entry. Maybe I'll be rewriting the thing some day, but for now I have to say I hardly now who the guy is.  +++$+++ :::Well, beyond the personal Filotti promotion/Filotti vendetta, I must say that a couple of those articles are still notable ([[Nestor Ignat]], even though the text we now have on him is grotesque, and most of the "info" unretriavable). Same thing on the newspapers: possibly [[Semănătorul (1870–1876)]] and most certainly [[Făt Frumos (magazine)]] are notable entries - the latter is thoroughly mentioned for instance by Călinescu, who puts it in the same category of relevance as ''Sămănătorul'' and ''Luceafărul''. That said, I'd definitely endorse a merger into the "Media in" entry for the rest, and maybe for all except ''Făt Frumos''. On Ungureanu: ugh, it's an ugly article; but the reviews cited, as well as stuff like [http://www.observatorcultural.ro/PROZA.-Cornel-Mihai-UNGUREANU-Pasii-sarpelui*articleID_8362-articles_details.html this], [http://www.romlit.ro/prozator_bun_caut_ambiii this], [http://www.romlit.ro/ntmplri_mrunte this] etc. do validate the entry. Maybe I'll be rewriting the thing some day, but for now I have to say I hardly now who the guy is. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn#top|talk]]) 09:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
17916 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17912 +++$+++ 17912 +++$+++ 2011-04-09 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.302382860E09 +++$+++ Indeed, I do have a few thoughts, which I've set down, but let me ask ''your'' thoughts on [[Gherasim Rusu-Togan]]. [http:\/\/www.zvp.ro\/2010\/12\/06\/gherasim-rusu-togan-\u201epentru-mine-poezia-inseamna-rugaciune-la-o-icoana\u201d\/ This] seems to be the only marginally meaningful (and I emphasize \"marginally\") coverage of him. -  +++$+++ :Indeed, I do have a few thoughts, which I've set down, but let me ask ''your'' thoughts on [[Gherasim Rusu-Togan]]. [http://www.zvp.ro/2010/12/06/gherasim-rusu-togan-„pentru-mine-poezia-inseamna-rugaciune-la-o-icoana”/ This] seems to be the only marginally meaningful (and I emphasize "marginally") coverage of him. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 14:01, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
17917 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17912 +++$+++ 17912 +++$+++ 2011-04-28 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.304057400E09 +++$+++ Oh, in light of recent events, let's take a look at some of Nicolae's good friends. [http:\/\/fototeca.iiccr.ro\/picdetails.php?picid=37542X4X6 Here] he is in [http:\/\/fototeca.iiccr.ro\/picdetails.php?picid=37544X5X6 Tripoli], [http:\/\/fototeca.iiccr.ro\/picdetails.php?picid=37200X2X4 Algiers], with his [http:\/\/fototeca.iiccr.ro\/picdetails.php?picid=37560X7X15 dear] [http:\/\/fototeca.iiccr.ro\/picdetails.php?picid=37564X9X15 friend] [http:\/\/fototeca.iiccr.ro\/picdetails.php?picid=37566X10X15 Hafez], with [http:\/\/fototeca.iiccr.ro\/picdetails.php?picid=35098X1X22 Hosni] and [http:\/\/fototeca.iiccr.ro\/picdetails.php?picid=37228X5X22 Anwar] ([http:\/\/fototeca.iiccr.ro\/picdetails.php?picid=37716X8X22 contrast] Elena with Mme Sadat). Of course there's Bourguiba's [http:\/\/fototeca.iiccr.ro\/picdetails.php?picid=34518X1X14 memorable visit], and this [http:\/\/fototeca.iiccr.ro\/picdetails.php?picid=36242X9X44 lighthearted shot] of the late, great, much-lamented Apostol celebrating [[Nowruz]] with the Shah's ambassador, at a time when the [[Khomeini|fanatic]] who [http:\/\/query.nytimes.com\/gst\/fullpage.html?res=9C00EFDB1F31F933A15750C0A9609C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all tried to suppress it] was stewing in [[Najaf]], by then an afterthought to Iranians of this diplomat's class&ndash;until dramatically forcing his way back into their consciousness. -  +++$+++ :Oh, in light of recent events, let's take a look at some of Nicolae's good friends. [http://fototeca.iiccr.ro/picdetails.php?picid=37542X4X6 Here] he is in [http://fototeca.iiccr.ro/picdetails.php?picid=37544X5X6 Tripoli], [http://fototeca.iiccr.ro/picdetails.php?picid=37200X2X4 Algiers], with his [http://fototeca.iiccr.ro/picdetails.php?picid=37560X7X15 dear] [http://fototeca.iiccr.ro/picdetails.php?picid=37564X9X15 friend] [http://fototeca.iiccr.ro/picdetails.php?picid=37566X10X15 Hafez], with [http://fototeca.iiccr.ro/picdetails.php?picid=35098X1X22 Hosni] and [http://fototeca.iiccr.ro/picdetails.php?picid=37228X5X22 Anwar] ([http://fototeca.iiccr.ro/picdetails.php?picid=37716X8X22 contrast] Elena with Mme Sadat). Of course there's Bourguiba's [http://fototeca.iiccr.ro/picdetails.php?picid=34518X1X14 memorable visit], and this [http://fototeca.iiccr.ro/picdetails.php?picid=36242X9X44 lighthearted shot] of the late, great, much-lamented Apostol celebrating [[Nowruz]] with the Shah's ambassador, at a time when the [[Khomeini|fanatic]] who [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C00EFDB1F31F933A15750C0A9609C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all tried to suppress it] was stewing in [[Najaf]], by then an afterthought to Iranians of this diplomat's class&ndash;until dramatically forcing his way back into their consciousness. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 23:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

542201 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-14 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.197678720E09 +++$+++ The article [[Wolf Armoured Vehicle]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has failed [[Image:Symbol unsupport vote.svg|20px]], see [[Talk:Wolf Armoured Vehicle]] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|reassessment]]. &mdash;  +++$+++ The article [[Wolf Armoured Vehicle]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has failed [[Image:Symbol unsupport vote.svg|20px]], see [[Talk:Wolf Armoured Vehicle]] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|reassessment]]. &mdash; [[User_talk:Rudget|Rudget]] <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rudget|Contributions]]</sub> 16:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
542202 +++$+++ Rudget +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542201 +++$+++ 542201 +++$+++ 2007-12-14 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.197703380E09 +++$+++ I understand. Thank you for contacting me. All the best for your time off Wikipedia. Regards, &mdash;  +++$+++ :I understand. Thank you for contacting me. All the best for your time off Wikipedia. Regards, &mdash; [[User_talk:Rudget|Rudget]] <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rudget|Contributions]]</sub> 23:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

280059 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-09 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.194651420E09 +++$+++ I closed, then archived the \"discussion\" as it was being perceived as disruptive. Please see [[User talk:PeterStJohn]] and [[WP:ANI#User:PeterStJohn_canvassing_of_DRV]], for example. -  +++$+++ I closed, then archived the "discussion" as it was being perceived as disruptive. Please see [[User talk:PeterStJohn]] and [[WP:ANI#User:PeterStJohn_canvassing_of_DRV]], for example. - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 15:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
280060 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280059 +++$+++ 280059 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.194651960E09 +++$+++ I think it is best to follow the normal procedures for archiving discussions on that page. If the consensus of the editors of that page disagree, then that discussion can be removed early.  +++$+++ :I think it is best to follow the normal procedures for archiving discussions on that page. If the consensus of the editors of that page disagree, then that discussion can be removed early. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
280061 +++$+++ Jc37 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280059 +++$+++ 280060 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.194652560E09 +++$+++ Considering that some of those editors are complaining, I disagree. And starting ''another'' discussion about a disruptive discussion doesn't sound like a great idea. That said, I don't plan on reverting. -  +++$+++ ::Considering that some of those editors are complaining, I disagree. And starting ''another'' discussion about a disruptive discussion doesn't sound like a great idea. That said, I don't plan on reverting. - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 15:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
280062 +++$+++ CBM +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280059 +++$+++ 280061 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.194653820E09 +++$+++ I left a comment there encouraging everyone to be mindful of the concerns that the discussion might be disruptive. I'm sure everyone will be mindful of not disrupting the DRV. I hope this will resolve the issue of archiving the discussion. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>( +++$+++ :::I left a comment there encouraging everyone to be mindful of the concerns that the discussion might be disruptive. I'm sure everyone will be mindful of not disrupting the DRV. I hope this will resolve the issue of archiving the discussion. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 16:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
280063 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280059 +++$+++ 280062 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.194654180E09 +++$+++ Thanks Carl. I think your comment sets the correct tone.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks Carl. I think your comment sets the correct tone. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
280064 +++$+++ PeterStJohn +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280059 +++$+++ 280063 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.194675660E09 +++$+++ Thanks Paul. I'm astonished by archiving a discussion ''during'' the discussion.  +++$+++ ::::: Thanks Paul. I'm astonished by archiving a discussion ''during'' the discussion. [[User:PeterStJohn|Pete St.John]] 22:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

341029 +++$+++ Brandt Luke Zorn +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ 341029 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-04 10:25:00 +++$+++ 1.186248300E09 +++$+++ <nowiki>:<\/nowiki>D That's one of my favorite albums ever. Nice to know that someone noticed my 33\u2153 subpage organizer thing (although I really have to set a schedule for updating it). Also, a long overdue thanks for helping with and making suggestions to improve the stuff I've done. -- +++$+++ <nowiki>:</nowiki>D That's one of my favorite albums ever. Nice to know that someone noticed my 33⅓ subpage organizer thing (although I really have to set a schedule for updating it). Also, a long overdue thanks for helping with and making suggestions to improve the stuff I've done. --[[User:Brandt Luke Zorn|Brandt Luke Zorn]] 10:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
341030 +++$+++ Brandt Luke Zorn +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ 341029 +++$+++ 341029 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.186249200E09 +++$+++ Haven't gotten a chance to listen to them, unfortunately. I mainly got into MbV because I wanted to hear more music like ''Siamese Dream''. -- +++$+++ :Haven't gotten a chance to listen to them, unfortunately. I mainly got into MbV because I wanted to hear more music like ''Siamese Dream''. --[[User:Brandt Luke Zorn|Brandt Luke Zorn]] 10:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
341031 +++$+++ Brandt Luke Zorn +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ 341029 +++$+++ 341030 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.186252560E09 +++$+++ Thanks; I'm actually considering knocking out a few more discographies before summer's over, Pumpkins included. They're relatively easy compared to articles, and getting a few featured would help a generally overlooked part of music-related articles here. Maybe we should have an \"Improve The Discography Page of Your Favorite Band\" Week at the alternative music WikiProject. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks; I'm actually considering knocking out a few more discographies before summer's over, Pumpkins included. They're relatively easy compared to articles, and getting a few featured would help a generally overlooked part of music-related articles here. Maybe we should have an "Improve The Discography Page of Your Favorite Band" Week at the alternative music WikiProject. --[[User:Brandt Luke Zorn|Brandt Luke Zorn]] 11:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
341032 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ 341029 +++$+++ 341031 +++$+++ 2007-08-04 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.186254480E09 +++$+++ Loveless. We should go for it; I can never decide if I prefer Loveless over closer, and I spent 4 years in a band that was basically rehashing \"To Here Knows When\" over and over (when we weren't trying to reproduce transmission). The Cavanagh book goes into the production in some detail, its a ''really'' great story.  +++$+++ :::Loveless. We should go for it; I can never decide if I prefer Loveless over closer, and I spent 4 years in a band that was basically rehashing "To Here Knows When" over and over (when we weren't trying to reproduce transmission). The Cavanagh book goes into the production in some detail, its a ''really'' great story. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] 12:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

17918 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-07 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.304828400E09 +++$+++ As Bamboo Club goes, so goes [[Ioan Popa (romanian writer)]]? -  +++$+++ As Bamboo Club goes, so goes [[Ioan Popa (romanian writer)]]? - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 21:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
17919 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17918 +++$+++ 17918 +++$+++ 2011-05-08 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.304888700E09 +++$+++ I did say there are lots of Ioan Popas running around, and you seem to have him confused with [http:\/\/www.adevarul.ro\/locale\/alba_iulia\/Ioan-Popa-scriitorul-literatura-Purpurei_0_310769036.html another one]. (Or so it seems: the one born in 1940 is from the Alba area, and he's writing about Blaj in the document you linked. The one up for deletion, born in 1955, is from Arge\u015f.) -  +++$+++ :I did say there are lots of Ioan Popas running around, and you seem to have him confused with [http://www.adevarul.ro/locale/alba_iulia/Ioan-Popa-scriitorul-literatura-Purpurei_0_310769036.html another one]. (Or so it seems: the one born in 1940 is from the Alba area, and he's writing about Blaj in the document you linked. The one up for deletion, born in 1955, is from Argeş.) - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 14:05, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

17920 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-22 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.306120620E09 +++$+++ Well, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Oliviu Craznic|''that'']] struck quite a nerve! Meanwhile, since you did move this to its present location, let me ask: [[C\u0103lim\u0103ne\u015fti]] or [[C\u0103lim\u0103ne\u015fti-C\u0103ciulata]]? If we're to go by official names, it seems pretty clear: [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1076&bih=665&q=%22orasul+calimanesti%22+site%3Acdep.ro&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= everyone] [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1076&bih=665&q=%22orasul+calimanesti%22+site%3Asenat.ro&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= worth] [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1076&bih=665&q=%22orasul+calimanesti%22+site%3Aprefecturavalcea.ro&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= checking] [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1076&bih=665&q=%22primaria+calimanesti%22+site%3Aprefecturavalcea.ro&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= with] [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1076&bih=665&q=%22orasul+calimanesti%22+site%3Acjvalcea.ro&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= calls] [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1076&bih=665&q=%22primaria+calimanesti%22+site%3Acjvalcea.ro&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= it] [http:\/\/www.primariacalimanesti.ro\/ \"C\u0103lim\u0103ne\u015fti\"]. Personally, I'd move to that location and refactor the lead (\"C\u0103lim\u0103ne\u015fti, often known as C\u0103lim\u0103ne\u015fti-C\u0103ciulata...\"). What say you? -  +++$+++ Well, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliviu Craznic|''that'']] struck quite a nerve! Meanwhile, since you did move this to its present location, let me ask: [[Călimăneşti]] or [[Călimăneşti-Căciulata]]? If we're to go by official names, it seems pretty clear: [http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1076&bih=665&q=%22orasul+calimanesti%22+site%3Acdep.ro&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= everyone] [http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1076&bih=665&q=%22orasul+calimanesti%22+site%3Asenat.ro&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= worth] [http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1076&bih=665&q=%22orasul+calimanesti%22+site%3Aprefecturavalcea.ro&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= checking] [http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1076&bih=665&q=%22primaria+calimanesti%22+site%3Aprefecturavalcea.ro&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= with] [http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1076&bih=665&q=%22orasul+calimanesti%22+site%3Acjvalcea.ro&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= calls] [http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1076&bih=665&q=%22primaria+calimanesti%22+site%3Acjvalcea.ro&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= it] [http://www.primariacalimanesti.ro/ "Călimăneşti"]. Personally, I'd move to that location and refactor the lead ("Călimăneşti, often known as Călimăneşti-Căciulata..."). What say you? - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 20:17, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
17921 +++$+++ Biruitorul +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17920 +++$+++ 17920 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.307956500E09 +++$+++ Ah, [[Mr. Pit]]! Speaking of \"Pit\", did you notice your photos of [[Pite\u015fti]] were again replaced, allegedly [[User_talk:Joyson_Noel#Reason|because]] \"they're outdated and they don't reflect the present day reality anymore!\"? -  +++$+++ :Ah, [[Mr. Pit]]! Speaking of "Pit", did you notice your photos of [[Piteşti]] were again replaced, allegedly [[User_talk:Joyson_Noel#Reason|because]] "they're outdated and they don't reflect the present day reality anymore!"? - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 02:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

280065 +++$+++ Ali'i +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280065 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-19 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.195510380E09 +++$+++ I mean it as no slight to you, please understand, but was just curious. Mahalo nui loa. -- +++$+++ I mean it as no slight to you, please understand, but was just curious. Mahalo nui loa. --[[User:Ali&#39;i|Ali&#39;i]] ([[User talk:Ali&#39;i|talk]]) 14:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
280066 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280065 +++$+++ 280065 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.195525680E09 +++$+++ A`ole pilikia.  +++$+++ : A`ole pilikia. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
280067 +++$+++ Ali'i +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280065 +++$+++ 280066 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.195527840E09 +++$+++ Mahalo! My question was answered in a satisfactorily way. My concerns are quelled. Thanks again. -- +++$+++ ::Mahalo! My question was answered in a satisfactorily way. My concerns are quelled. Thanks again. --[[User:Ali&#39;i|Ali&#39;i]] ([[User talk:Ali&#39;i|talk]]) 19:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

17922 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17922 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-15 08:02:00 +++$+++ 1.302879720E09 +++$+++ }}  [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 08:02, 15 April 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ }}  [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 08:02, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
17923 +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17922 +++$+++ 17922 +++$+++ 2011-04-20 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.303343760E09 +++$+++ Buna ziua, Charlie.  +++$+++ :Buna ziua, Charlie. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn#top|talk]]) 16:56, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

506881 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-16 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.184583300E09 +++$+++ Nah, seriously. Thanks. :) - +++$+++ Nah, seriously. Thanks. :) -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 03:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
506882 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506881 +++$+++ 506881 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.184583480E09 +++$+++ Hey, you snooze, you lose. -- +++$+++ :Hey, you snooze, you lose. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] 03:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

280069 +++$+++ Irpen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-22 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.195798440E09 +++$+++ I am generally [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Piotrus\/Workshop#Ethical_conduct| opposed to the communication with Arbitrators outside of the ArbCom pages]], but I am merely asking you to read what I posted to [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Advise to ArbCom by Irpen]] since this message would loose part of its relevance once the case is accepted and the acceptance is pending. So, I am posting this message to all Arbitrators who indicated the interest to this case by casting their votes so far. You do not have to respond if you think that my concerns have no merit. Regards, -- +++$+++ I am generally [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Piotrus/Workshop#Ethical_conduct| opposed to the communication with Arbitrators outside of the ArbCom pages]], but I am merely asking you to read what I posted to [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Advise to ArbCom by Irpen]] since this message would loose part of its relevance once the case is accepted and the acceptance is pending. So, I am posting this message to all Arbitrators who indicated the interest to this case by casting their votes so far. You do not have to respond if you think that my concerns have no merit. Regards, --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] ([[User talk:Irpen|talk]]) 22:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
280070 +++$+++ Irpen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280069 +++$+++ 280069 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.196905680E09 +++$+++ Just letting you know that I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FAnonimu%2FProposed_decision&diff=175961926&oldid=175952333 responded to your question]. -- +++$+++ :Just letting you know that I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FAnonimu%2FProposed_decision&diff=175961926&oldid=175952333 responded to your question]. --[[user:Irpen|Irpen]] 17:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
280071 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280069 +++$+++ 280070 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.196906400E09 +++$+++ And I've responded there.  +++$+++ ::And I've responded there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

17927 +++$+++ Ionutzmovie +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17927 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-06 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.304744160E09 +++$+++ V\u0103 rog s\u0103-mi scrie\u021bi citatele din Kog\u0103lniceanu; retraducerea lor nu iese prea bine. Mul\u021bumesc. +++$+++ Vă rog să-mi scrieți citatele din Kogălniceanu; retraducerea lor nu iese prea bine. Mulțumesc.[[User:Ionutzmovie|Ionutzmovie]] ([[User talk:Ionutzmovie|talk]]) 21:56, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
17928 +++$+++ Ionutzmovie +++$+++ Dahn +++$+++ 17927 +++$+++ 17927 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.304775120E09 +++$+++ Mul\u021bumesc,  si ma mir ca pe Wikipedia romana articolul [[:ro:Mihail Kog\u0103lniceanu|Mihail Kog\u0103lniceanu]] articolul este intr-o stare janlnica. Dar nu ar trebui sa ma mire, am vazut de ce ai fost blocat si inca se mai continua cu nedreptatile. Din cauza atmosferei au ramas doar cativa contribuitori. +++$+++ :Mulțumesc,  si ma mir ca pe Wikipedia romana articolul [[:ro:Mihail Kogălniceanu|Mihail Kogălniceanu]] articolul este intr-o stare janlnica. Dar nu ar trebui sa ma mire, am vazut de ce ai fost blocat si inca se mai continua cu nedreptatile. Din cauza atmosferei au ramas doar cativa contribuitori.[[User:Ionutzmovie|Ionutzmovie]] ([[User talk:Ionutzmovie|talk]]) 06:32, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

280072 +++$+++ Isarig +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-26 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.196126520E09 +++$+++ Since I have not been able to get an answer to this on the project page, let me ask you directly: Did you receive Durova's \"secret evidence\" prior to the blocking of [[User:!!]]?  +++$+++ Since I have not been able to get an answer to this on the project page, let me ask you directly: Did you receive Durova's "secret evidence" prior to the blocking of [[User:!!]]? [[User:Isarig|Isarig]] ([[User talk:Isarig|talk]]) 17:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
280073 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280072 +++$+++ 280072 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.196131260E09 +++$+++ No.  +++$+++ :No. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
280074 +++$+++ Isarig +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280072 +++$+++ 280073 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.196135400E09 +++$+++ thank you.  +++$+++ ::thank you. [[User:Isarig|Isarig]] ([[User talk:Isarig|talk]]) 19:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

308823 +++$+++ WAS 4.250 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308823 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-13 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.221321600E09 +++$+++ At WikiVersity, Jon Awbrey used a phrase I did not know the meaning of; so I looked it up and read [[Kleene star]]. The article has no external links and no sources and no footnotes. Should I delete it? Should someone place a fact tag after each claim? This is common among our math articles. Perhaps Jon used a sock to create a hoax math article? I think we should not delete all unsourced claims. I think we should only delete claims that we have  a reasonable suspicion of being false. I do not have  a reasonable suspicion that any claim in this article is false. What do you think?  +++$+++ At WikiVersity, Jon Awbrey used a phrase I did not know the meaning of; so I looked it up and read [[Kleene star]]. The article has no external links and no sources and no footnotes. Should I delete it? Should someone place a fact tag after each claim? This is common among our math articles. Perhaps Jon used a sock to create a hoax math article? I think we should not delete all unsourced claims. I think we should only delete claims that we have  a reasonable suspicion of being false. I do not have  a reasonable suspicion that any claim in this article is false. What do you think? [[User:WAS 4.250|WAS 4.250]] ([[User talk:WAS 4.250|talk]]) 09:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
308824 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308823 +++$+++ 308823 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.221324120E09 +++$+++ See [[WP:V]]. Try looking for sources, and add such reliable references as you can find. If you can't find any, put an unreferenced tag on the article for a reasonable time, but balance the delay before RfD against the policy that the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. . .  +++$+++ :See [[WP:V]]. Try looking for sources, and add such reliable references as you can find. If you can't find any, put an unreferenced tag on the article for a reasonable time, but balance the delay before RfD against the policy that the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
308825 +++$+++ WAS 4.250 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308823 +++$+++ 308824 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.221327060E09 +++$+++ We appear to agree on the proper approach. I saw no evidence that this approach was used in the deletion of large amounts of encyclopedic religious data. Instead there was an appearance of gaming the system. I could be wrong about that; and in fact I assume that he ''sometimes'' followed the correct procedure as you outlined above (the trying to find sources is the key part). People should edit stuff they have knowledge about. Otherwise often one does not know where to look for data; nor know which sources are reliable. When people edit things they have contempt for, the appearance of gaming the system is almost ensured because they will think they have reasonable suspicion that the claims are false with very little effort put into a search for confirming data. Perhaps something like that occurred.  +++$+++ ::We appear to agree on the proper approach. I saw no evidence that this approach was used in the deletion of large amounts of encyclopedic religious data. Instead there was an appearance of gaming the system. I could be wrong about that; and in fact I assume that he ''sometimes'' followed the correct procedure as you outlined above (the trying to find sources is the key part). People should edit stuff they have knowledge about. Otherwise often one does not know where to look for data; nor know which sources are reliable. When people edit things they have contempt for, the appearance of gaming the system is almost ensured because they will think they have reasonable suspicion that the claims are false with very little effort put into a search for confirming data. Perhaps something like that occurred. [[User:WAS 4.250|WAS 4.250]] ([[User talk:WAS 4.250|talk]]) 10:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
308826 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308823 +++$+++ 308825 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.221327840E09 +++$+++ Diffs please. What I've seen is articles which have been tagged as needing sources for the best part of a year being scrutinised and put up for deletion after no reliable sources could be found. When I've checked and found sources, I've added them and debated the significance of the sources, but some are extremely marginal subjects with the only sources that could be found being selfpublished, incidental passing mentions, or brief mentions in selfpublished sources from other unreliable non-notable organisations. Hrafn, in my opinion, put a lot of effort into finding and evaluating sources. Cat's evidence is very unreliable. . .  +++$+++ :::Diffs please. What I've seen is articles which have been tagged as needing sources for the best part of a year being scrutinised and put up for deletion after no reliable sources could be found. When I've checked and found sources, I've added them and debated the significance of the sources, but some are extremely marginal subjects with the only sources that could be found being selfpublished, incidental passing mentions, or brief mentions in selfpublished sources from other unreliable non-notable organisations. Hrafn, in my opinion, put a lot of effort into finding and evaluating sources. Cat's evidence is very unreliable. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 10:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
308827 +++$+++ WAS 4.250 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308823 +++$+++ 308826 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.221329460E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Hrafn]] mentions some redirected articles that have since been reverted and sourced showing that the problem may be that unfamiliarity with the subject led to them not knowing where to look for sources. If one adds a request for sources on too many claims all at once, people will simply not be able to provide the sources in a short time. This is what is claimed. Having dealt with this group of friends in the past, I believe the claim. But you generally impress me as an unbiased person, so your claim to the opposite deserves respect.  +++$+++ ::::[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Hrafn]] mentions some redirected articles that have since been reverted and sourced showing that the problem may be that unfamiliarity with the subject led to them not knowing where to look for sources. If one adds a request for sources on too many claims all at once, people will simply not be able to provide the sources in a short time. This is what is claimed. Having dealt with this group of friends in the past, I believe the claim. But you generally impress me as an unbiased person, so your claim to the opposite deserves respect. [[User:WAS 4.250|WAS 4.250]] ([[User talk:WAS 4.250|talk]]) 11:11, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
308828 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308823 +++$+++ 308827 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.221331200E09 +++$+++ If you have a good look at the history of the articles presented as examples in that RfC you'll find that the descriptions are simply wrong, at least in the ones I've looked at and I don't claim to have examined them all. Claims have to be carefully checked. As it happens, I've just been looking at [[Talk:J. C. Massee]] and you might find the discussions there illuminating. . .  +++$+++ :::::If you have a good look at the history of the articles presented as examples in that RfC you'll find that the descriptions are simply wrong, at least in the ones I've looked at and I don't claim to have examined them all. Claims have to be carefully checked. As it happens, I've just been looking at [[Talk:J. C. Massee]] and you might find the discussions there illuminating. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 11:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
308829 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308823 +++$+++ 308827 +++$+++ 2008-09-13 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.221331560E09 +++$+++ By the way, if you read the section above this you'll notice that it's not a good idea to work on assumptions based on vague labels. Past experience may justify a critical and careful examination of work or statements, but it doesn't justify assuming bad faith and not doing that examination or making judgements without asking to find out the defence case. Obviously, I don't think my friends are as bad as they're painted. . .  +++$+++ :::::By the way, if you read the section above this you'll notice that it's not a good idea to work on assumptions based on vague labels. Past experience may justify a critical and careful examination of work or statements, but it doesn't justify assuming bad faith and not doing that examination or making judgements without asking to find out the defence case. Obviously, I don't think my friends are as bad as they're painted. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 11:46, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

542221 +++$+++ Sunderland06 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-16 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.197845460E09 +++$+++ Can you coach 2 people because i'd really like it if you could also coach me, because i think your quite knowledgeable.'''<span style=\"background:Red;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ Can you coach 2 people because i'd really like it if you could also coach me, because i think your quite knowledgeable.'''<span style="background:Red;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Sunderland06|<font color="White">Sunder</font>]][[User talk:Sunderland06|<font color="black">land</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sunderland06|<font color="White">06</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 14:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
542222 +++$+++ Sunderland06 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542221 +++$+++ 542221 +++$+++ 2007-12-16 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.197851040E09 +++$+++ So, how about it then?.'''<span style=\"background:Red;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ :So, how about it then?.'''<span style="background:Red;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Sunderland06|<font color="White">Sunder</font>]][[User talk:Sunderland06|<font color="black">land</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sunderland06|<font color="White">06</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 16:24, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
542223 +++$+++ Sunderland06 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542221 +++$+++ 542222 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.197948000E09 +++$+++ Yeah, sure after the adoption is over, thanks.'''<span style=\"background:Red;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Yeah, sure after the adoption is over, thanks.'''<span style="background:Red;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Sunderland06|<font color="White">Sunder</font>]][[User talk:Sunderland06|<font color="black">land</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sunderland06|<font color="White">06</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 19:20, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

17934 +++$+++ Anthonyhcole +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-03 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.304423880E09 +++$+++ Hi. You cite [[WP:IUP]] for your removal of the image at [[Depression (mood)]]. Can you please tell me which element of that policy we were breaching there? -- +++$+++ Hi. You cite [[WP:IUP]] for your removal of the image at [[Depression (mood)]]. Can you please tell me which element of that policy we were breaching there? --[[User:Anthonyhcole|Anthonyhcole]] ([[User talk:Anthonyhcole|talk]]) 04:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
17935 +++$+++ Anthonyhcole +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17934 +++$+++ 17934 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.304751780E09 +++$+++ For now, I've restored the image but please comment at [[Talk:Depression_(mood)#The_photo]] if you think it should be removed or replaced by a more appropriate one. -- +++$+++ :For now, I've restored the image but please comment at [[Talk:Depression_(mood)#The_photo]] if you think it should be removed or replaced by a more appropriate one. --[[User:Anthonyhcole|Anthonyhcole]] ([[User talk:Anthonyhcole|talk]]) 00:03, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
17936 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17934 +++$+++ 17934 +++$+++ 2011-05-08 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.304912220E09 +++$+++ As I mentioned in the edit summaries, the links appear to be [[WP:SPAM]], promoting the work of an individual artist. Articles are not for [[WP:PROMOTION|personal advertising]]. See [[WP:EL]] and [[WP:SPAMLINK]]. It appears that you may have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. I have no personal agenda here other than clearing up spam.  +++$+++ :As I mentioned in the edit summaries, the links appear to be [[WP:SPAM]], promoting the work of an individual artist. Articles are not for [[WP:PROMOTION|personal advertising]]. See [[WP:EL]] and [[WP:SPAMLINK]]. It appears that you may have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. I have no personal agenda here other than clearing up spam. [[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej#top|talk]]) 20:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

265133 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265133 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-30 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.222805100E09 +++$+++ Hello, I noticed that after I delinked the birth and death dates in articles, you restored them, citing MOS. I see we have differences on opinion over what should be linked and what shouldn't. You had precedence over me in the date linking, so I won't revert you. However, I wanted to say that as of ''right now'', there is nothing in the MOS that says to link birth and death dates, and that there is no consensus in the discussion over whether that should be done or not. Thanks for your understanding,  +++$+++ Hello, I noticed that after I delinked the birth and death dates in articles, you restored them, citing MOS. I see we have differences on opinion over what should be linked and what shouldn't. You had precedence over me in the date linking, so I won't revert you. However, I wanted to say that as of ''right now'', there is nothing in the MOS that says to link birth and death dates, and that there is no consensus in the discussion over whether that should be done or not. Thanks for your understanding, [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 13:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
265134 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265133 +++$+++ 265133 +++$+++ 2008-09-30 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.222827060E09 +++$+++ The status quo on Wikipedia, until now, is to link significant dates only. These have been generally understood to be birth , death and dates of historical significance. Until a consensus is reached on  a guideline you have no mandate to remove date links and are seriously damaging Wikipedia's usefulness.  +++$+++ :The status quo on Wikipedia, until now, is to link significant dates only. These have been generally understood to be birth , death and dates of historical significance. Until a consensus is reached on  a guideline you have no mandate to remove date links and are seriously damaging Wikipedia's usefulness. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 19:11, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
265135 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265133 +++$+++ 265134 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.226579340E09 +++$+++ Please use correct reasoning in your edit summaries: \"Wikipedia's policy is to link significant dates. Birth and death in a biography are significant\" There is no such \"policy\" to link significant dates. Another thing: linking dates in Featured Articles ([[Isaac Newton]], [[William Shakespeare]] and Featured Lists is definitely against consensus; see [[WP:WIAFA|the featured article criteria]] and the [[WP:WIAFL|featured list criteria]], which specifically say to follow all style guidelines. Additionally, there is a clear consensus on both FAC and FLC to not link dates.  +++$+++ ::Please use correct reasoning in your edit summaries: "Wikipedia's policy is to link significant dates. Birth and death in a biography are significant" There is no such "policy" to link significant dates. Another thing: linking dates in Featured Articles ([[Isaac Newton]], [[William Shakespeare]] and Featured Lists is definitely against consensus; see [[WP:WIAFA|the featured article criteria]] and the [[WP:WIAFL|featured list criteria]], which specifically say to follow all style guidelines. Additionally, there is a clear consensus on both FAC and FLC to not link dates. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 04:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265136 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265133 +++$+++ 265134 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.226579820E09 +++$+++ For another reason why not to link dates, see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Alexander_I_of_Russia&diff=251438518&oldid=251015210 your edit to Alexander I of Russia]. Before you\u2014against MOS\u2014linked the dates, there were inconsistent date formats ''in the lead''. The least you could have done was fix them to be the same format. Instead, you linked those dates. If I had not unlinked and corrected the formats, who knows how long our IP readers (who make up the vast majority of our readership and cannot use autoformatting) would have seen those inconsistent date formats, which would have gone unnoticed by many registered users because of autoformatting.  +++$+++ ::For another reason why not to link dates, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_I_of_Russia&diff=251438518&oldid=251015210 your edit to Alexander I of Russia]. Before you—against MOS—linked the dates, there were inconsistent date formats ''in the lead''. The least you could have done was fix them to be the same format. Instead, you linked those dates. If I had not unlinked and corrected the formats, who knows how long our IP readers (who make up the vast majority of our readership and cannot use autoformatting) would have seen those inconsistent date formats, which would have gone unnoticed by many registered users because of autoformatting. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 04:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
265137 +++$+++ JackofOz +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265133 +++$+++ 265134 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.226579820E09 +++$+++ See also my post @ \"Date linking\" below, which makes much the same point.  --   +++$+++ ::See also my post @ "Date linking" below, which makes much the same point.  --  [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) 04:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

542225 +++$+++ Legionarius +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542225 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-18 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.198041600E09 +++$+++ Hi Dreamafter, how are you? Please, I would like to get your opinion on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Traffic#External_Links_removal this issue].-- +++$+++ Hi Dreamafter, how are you? Please, I would like to get your opinion on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Traffic#External_Links_removal this issue].--[[User:Legionarius|Legionarius]] ([[User talk:Legionarius|talk]]) 21:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
542226 +++$+++ Legionarius +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542225 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-18 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.198043040E09 +++$+++ err...sorry to ask, but which ones? There are five links.-- +++$+++ ::err...sorry to ask, but which ones? There are five links.--[[User:Legionarius|Legionarius]] ([[User talk:Legionarius|talk]]) 21:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
542227 +++$+++ Legionarius +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542225 +++$+++ 542225 +++$+++ 2007-12-18 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.198043820E09 +++$+++ Thanks :-)-- +++$+++ :Thanks :-)--[[User:Legionarius|Legionarius]] ([[User talk:Legionarius|talk]]) 21:57, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

17938 +++$+++ We hope +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-09 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.304960820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:We hope|We hope]] ([[User talk:We hope|talk]]) 10:07, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
17939 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17938 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.305010980E09 +++$+++ I was asked for an outside opinion and have given one at the article talk page.   ''' +++$+++ ::I was asked for an outside opinion and have given one at the article talk page.   '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 00:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

280084 +++$+++ Osli73 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-14 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.197670200E09 +++$+++ If it becomes too time consuming to continously seek remedies against people who are consistently misusing Wikipedia to push nationalist views, only die hard natioalists and people with extreme views will have the tenacity to edit pages which attract these types of editors. Unfortunately, some of these articles are not notable enough to draw a large number of editors and the POV pushing is often quite subtle (though more often, such as in the examples I cite above, it's not). I believe an arbcom encompassing a wider set of smaller conflicts related to the same issue or user(s) would be an efficient way of dealing with these types of probelems. Your comments and\/or guidance on this matter would be much appreciated. +++$+++ If it becomes too time consuming to continously seek remedies against people who are consistently misusing Wikipedia to push nationalist views, only die hard natioalists and people with extreme views will have the tenacity to edit pages which attract these types of editors. Unfortunately, some of these articles are not notable enough to draw a large number of editors and the POV pushing is often quite subtle (though more often, such as in the examples I cite above, it's not). I believe an arbcom encompassing a wider set of smaller conflicts related to the same issue or user(s) would be an efficient way of dealing with these types of probelems. Your comments and/or guidance on this matter would be much appreciated.[[User:Osli73|Osli73]] ([[User talk:Osli73|talk]]) 14:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
280085 +++$+++ The Dragon of Bosnia +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280084 +++$+++ 280084 +++$+++ 2007-12-15 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.197750780E09 +++$+++ Osli73 then wrote [[Role of Serb media in the 1991-1999 wars in the former Yugoslavia]] in order to replace the existing [[Serb propaganda]] article based on International court for War Crimes verdicts. And he also nominated Serb propaganda article for deletion. But it didn't go well, and now he is asking another way to destroy other users effort and contribution. I was also suggested to start a request for comment if he continues to behave this way. Regards.  +++$+++ *Osli73 then wrote [[Role of Serb media in the 1991-1999 wars in the former Yugoslavia]] in order to replace the existing [[Serb propaganda]] article based on International court for War Crimes verdicts. And he also nominated Serb propaganda article for deletion. But it didn't go well, and now he is asking another way to destroy other users effort and contribution. I was also suggested to start a request for comment if he continues to behave this way. Regards. [[User:The Dragon of Bosnia|The Dragon of Bosnia]] ([[User talk:The Dragon of Bosnia|talk]]) 12:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

17941 +++$+++ George Dance +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17941 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-19 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.305871860E09 +++$+++ Hello. Who are you, and when are we to have met or communicated in the past?  +++$+++ Hello. Who are you, and when are we to have met or communicated in the past? [[User:George Dance|George Dance]] ([[User talk:George Dance|talk]]) 23:11, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
17942 +++$+++ George Dance +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17941 +++$+++ 17941 +++$+++ 2011-05-19 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.305874380E09 +++$+++ If you wish to remove links to poems from articles I've written, please find other links to the same poems and substitute them.  +++$+++ : If you wish to remove links to poems from articles I've written, please find other links to the same poems and substitute them. [[User:George Dance|George Dance]] ([[User talk:George Dance|talk]]) 23:53, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
17943 +++$+++ George Dance +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17941 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-20 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.305890520E09 +++$+++ I posted a reply on my own talk page.  +++$+++ ::: I posted a reply on my own talk page. [[User:George Dance|George Dance]] ([[User talk:George Dance|talk]]) 04:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

570969 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-18 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.161179220E09 +++$+++ Long time no see.  Well <font color=\"red\">  Comma <big> '''X''' <\/big> <\/font> I am out of the [[prison|big house]].  Free at last. Its great. Soak me down and sign me up for the Wikiwar.  Together we can destroy the galaxy, take that [[Australian greens|greens party]] <font color=\"red\"> Link to nothing <big> '''XX''' <\/big> <\/font> .  '''' +++$+++ Long time no see.  Well <font color="red">  Comma <big> '''X''' </big> </font> I am out of the [[prison|big house]].  Free at last. Its great. Soak me down and sign me up for the Wikiwar.  Together we can destroy the galaxy, take that [[Australian greens|greens party]] <font color="red"> Link to nothing <big> '''XX''' </big> </font> .  ''''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 06:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
570970 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570969 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.161181380E09 +++$+++ I propose we change the army name from Fairchild Republic to Wiki Empire aka Imperium of Wiki.    '''' +++$+++ ::I propose we change the army name from Fairchild Republic to Wiki Empire aka Imperium of Wiki.    ''''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 07:23, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
570971 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570969 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.161194760E09 +++$+++ Happy? I know I am not, with you constantly busting down my door. <font color=\"red\"> Relivancy?? <big> '''X''' <\/big> <\/font>  ''' +++$+++ ::Happy? I know I am not, with you constantly busting down my door. <font color="red"> Relivancy?? <big> '''X''' </big> </font>  '''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 11:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

17944 +++$+++  +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17944 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-29 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.306710780E09 +++$+++ It is working for me and just passed at [[WP:FS]] so it is working for a lot of other people.  I will create an audio only version that people can listen to if they can not view the video.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ It is working for me and just passed at [[WP:FS]] so it is working for a lot of other people.  I will create an audio only version that people can listen to if they can not view the video.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 16:13, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
17945 +++$+++  +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17944 +++$+++ 17944 +++$+++ 2011-05-29 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.306711740E09 +++$+++ Does the audio only file work for you?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ :Does the audio only file work for you?--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 16:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

542234 +++$+++ Sunderland06 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-19 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.198127880E09 +++$+++ But do you think that y attempt was good or not, if it wasn't just say so, i don't mind critiscism.'''<span style=\"background:Red;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ But do you think that y attempt was good or not, if it wasn't just say so, i don't mind critiscism.'''<span style="background:Red;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Sunderland06|<font color="White">Sunder</font>]][[User talk:Sunderland06|<font color="black">land</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sunderland06|<font color="White">06</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 21:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
542235 +++$+++ Sunderland06 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542234 +++$+++ 542234 +++$+++ 2007-12-19 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.198128120E09 +++$+++ Hi, so are you forwardng that one to him, and will you please give me about 1 in 2 requests to get my experience up,Thanks. Oh and do you think that i would be a good signature maker. Thanks again. '''<span style=\"background:Red;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ :Hi, so are you forwardng that one to him, and will you please give me about 1 in 2 requests to get my experience up,Thanks. Oh and do you think that i would be a good signature maker. Thanks again. '''<span style="background:Red;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Sunderland06|<font color="White">Sunder</font>]][[User talk:Sunderland06|<font color="black">land</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sunderland06|<font color="White">06</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 21:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

17947 +++$+++ Koavf +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-05 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.307326440E09 +++$+++ '''Sure''' Like I said elsewhere, I was just getting authors out of [[:Category:Postmodern literature]] and categorizing more of them based on [[List of postmodern writers]]. If the categories are inappropriate, then I fully support someone removing them, but reverting back to when they were categorized in [[:Category:Postmodern literature]] and [[:Category:Postmodernists]] gets us nowhere ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Jorge_Luis_Borges&action=historysubmit&diff=432590837&oldid=432564483 e.g.]) I would be happy to help you with this, but I'm simply too ignorant about literature to determine if (e.g.) [[Joseph Heller]] is a postmodern author or not. \u2014 +++$+++ '''Sure''' Like I said elsewhere, I was just getting authors out of [[:Category:Postmodern literature]] and categorizing more of them based on [[List of postmodern writers]]. If the categories are inappropriate, then I fully support someone removing them, but reverting back to when they were categorized in [[:Category:Postmodern literature]] and [[:Category:Postmodernists]] gets us nowhere ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jorge_Luis_Borges&action=historysubmit&diff=432590837&oldid=432564483 e.g.]) I would be happy to help you with this, but I'm simply too ignorant about literature to determine if (e.g.) [[Joseph Heller]] is a postmodern author or not. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 19:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
17948 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17947 +++$+++ 17947 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.307327220E09 +++$+++ Hi, I didn't see your comment elsewhere. I'm puzzled by what you say, as writers like  [[Alice Walker]] and [[Roald Dahl]] were never listed as  [[:Category:Postmodern literature]] as far as I can see. Am I missing something?  +++$+++ :Hi, I didn't see your comment elsewhere. I'm puzzled by what you say, as writers like  [[Alice Walker]] and [[Roald Dahl]] were never listed as  [[:Category:Postmodern literature]] as far as I can see. Am I missing something? [[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej#top|talk]]) 19:27, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
17949 +++$+++ Koavf +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17947 +++$+++ 17948 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.307328720E09 +++$+++ '''See here''' [[List_of_postmodern_writers]]. \u2014 +++$+++ ::'''See here''' [[List_of_postmodern_writers]]. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 19:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

542236 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-20 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.198148400E09 +++$+++ Could you please delete [[Artemis Fowl: The Time Paradox|this page]], and move [[Artemis Fowl 6|this page]] to it, but keep the first one's name? Thanks, &lt;<tt> +++$+++ Could you please delete [[Artemis Fowl: The Time Paradox|this page]], and move [[Artemis Fowl 6|this page]] to it, but keep the first one's name? Thanks, &lt;<tt>[[User:Dreamafter|<font color="crimson">DREAMAFTER</font>]]</tt>&gt; <sup>&lt;[[User talk:Dreamafter|<font color="purple">TALK</font>]]&gt;</sup> 03:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
542237 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542236 +++$+++ 542236 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 08:44:00 +++$+++ 1.198169040E09 +++$+++ Done!  Let me know if it's ok.  +++$+++ :Done!  Let me know if it's ok. [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 08:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

17950 +++$+++ Omnibus170 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17950 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-14 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.308052140E09 +++$+++ Spangelj, I have added dozens of verifiable references to Ms. Agee's article in response to the banner giving notice that this was needed.  I have been the Director of Communication at the Nurturing Network for 20 years and feel response for saving this article from being the chopped up mess that it was a couple of weeks ago.  I have access to dozens of well-sourced references, which, as you can see, I added today. It isn't clear to me what finding consensus means in Wikipedia or how you go about reaching it. Mrs. Agee is an historical figure among women activists and her article needs reflect that.  The material that I have worked on for the past week and published today is factual and well sourced.  What aspect of it isn't acceptable to you?  How do we proceed from here?  Getting this right is a high priority.  I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.  +++$+++ Spangelj, I have added dozens of verifiable references to Ms. Agee's article in response to the banner giving notice that this was needed.  I have been the Director of Communication at the Nurturing Network for 20 years and feel response for saving this article from being the chopped up mess that it was a couple of weeks ago.  I have access to dozens of well-sourced references, which, as you can see, I added today. It isn't clear to me what finding consensus means in Wikipedia or how you go about reaching it. Mrs. Agee is an historical figure among women activists and her article needs reflect that.  The material that I have worked on for the past week and published today is factual and well sourced.  What aspect of it isn't acceptable to you?  How do we proceed from here?  Getting this right is a high priority.  I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. [[User:Omnibus170|Omnibus170]] ([[User talk:Omnibus170|talk]]) 04:49, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
17951 +++$+++ Omnibus170 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17950 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.308294720E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your efforts to identify \u201ctrouble spots\u201d that you feel do not reflect a NPOV in this article.  If you will point out sections that you feel conflict with Wiki policy or need a reference, I would happy to work on them further and propose an improvement that we can both accept.  My goal is twofold:  Removal of \u201cwarning\u201d banners as soon as possible and making sure that the factual, historic element of Cunningham's early advocacy for women is not overlooked.  I know Cunningham Agee the person. I know the facts. I have or can get references.  You know how Wiki works \u2013 and you can balance any tendency I could have that may not be neutral.  That makes us a good team. What is really on my mind today is the importance of not removing core elements of this article because it includes accomplishments and awards \u2026 and in so doing fail to tell the story of this historic person.  There is a reason for the awards and Board service \u2013 and the reason is an appreciation people have for how Cunningham took the experience of Bendix \u2013 her own hurt \u2013 and the hurt of losing a child - and turned it into an advantage for other women who are hurting.  That is the story we must tell from a NPOV. The interesting twist on Cunningham\u2019s life-long commitment to empowering women is that she didn\u2019t go the route of advocating for abortion rights; she went the route of seeking a common ground on the abortion issue and placing high priority on the provision of practical resources for women in crisis. Very few leading feminists of the day made that choice.  As a Roman Catholic who was strongly influenced by a Monsignor who befriended her family when she was very young, Cunningham\u2019s faith drew her in this direction.  That is why the connection with Monsignor \u201cFather Bill\u201d Nolan is important in her story. She melded the painful experience of Bendix and losing her first child to a miscarriage with her extensive training in strategic planning to found an international charity.  We simply can\u2019t leave corporate strategic planner out of her lead story line.  It belongs there as it is central to her professional life. Is there any of this material in the new opening section that you are not comfortable with?  +++$+++ ::I appreciate your efforts to identify “trouble spots” that you feel do not reflect a NPOV in this article.  If you will point out sections that you feel conflict with Wiki policy or need a reference, I would happy to work on them further and propose an improvement that we can both accept.  My goal is twofold:  Removal of “warning” banners as soon as possible and making sure that the factual, historic element of Cunningham's early advocacy for women is not overlooked.  I know Cunningham Agee the person. I know the facts. I have or can get references.  You know how Wiki works – and you can balance any tendency I could have that may not be neutral.  That makes us a good team. What is really on my mind today is the importance of not removing core elements of this article because it includes accomplishments and awards … and in so doing fail to tell the story of this historic person.  There is a reason for the awards and Board service – and the reason is an appreciation people have for how Cunningham took the experience of Bendix – her own hurt – and the hurt of losing a child - and turned it into an advantage for other women who are hurting.  That is the story we must tell from a NPOV. The interesting twist on Cunningham’s life-long commitment to empowering women is that she didn’t go the route of advocating for abortion rights; she went the route of seeking a common ground on the abortion issue and placing high priority on the provision of practical resources for women in crisis. Very few leading feminists of the day made that choice.  As a Roman Catholic who was strongly influenced by a Monsignor who befriended her family when she was very young, Cunningham’s faith drew her in this direction.  That is why the connection with Monsignor “Father Bill” Nolan is important in her story. She melded the painful experience of Bendix and losing her first child to a miscarriage with her extensive training in strategic planning to found an international charity.  We simply can’t leave corporate strategic planner out of her lead story line.  It belongs there as it is central to her professional life. Is there any of this material in the new opening section that you are not comfortable with? [[User:Omnibus170|Omnibus170]] ([[User talk:Omnibus170|talk]]) 00:12, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
17952 +++$+++ Omnibus170 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17950 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.308298620E09 +++$+++ I have added back some material (the middle paragraph) ofyour work in the Career section that I feel is essential.  It is factual and well documented. I corrected some typos in the Nurturing Network section.  I feel strongly that we must communicate how the experience of Bendix made Mary a public and historic figure in the context of gaining equality for women in the workplace.  As background, here is a little history that may help you to see that her business experience is pivotal in the feminist movement in this country. She didn\u2019t plan it that way; but she became a pioneer.  Her story isn\u2019t important because the media went bananas and the country was curious; it is important because it was a pivotal event in the feminist movement.  When her blonde head hit the glass ceiling, all hell broke loss and women who were earning half as much as men for the same job all cheered. It created a country wide \"wake up call\" that the good old boy network was a thing of the past - that female colleagues would be treated respectfully and professionaly.  Silly today, I know.  But this was how it was in the 80's. We had to learn.  Cunningham wrote about the experience, landed on her feet after being much sought after by other Fortune 100 companies.  She had a successful career with Seagram developing their world wide strategy.  She left all of that to found a successful international charity that has been a resource for women for 25 years. This is what we need to capture in words that conform to Wiki guidelines.  I look forward to having your help in accomplishing this. It might be worth mentioning that today the Bendix story would almost seem quaint \u2013 a woman has frequent access to her boss and 2-3 years later they get married.  No big deal.  The 80\u2019s was an entirely different ballgame.  That is the reason that Gloria Steinem \u2013 a leading feminist \u2013 came to Cunningham\u2019s defense.  And why that documented fact is important to include.  It is about feminism and who the early pioneers were.  This is core material in the story. Rather than diminish the lead paragraph in Agee\u2019s article, I am proposing that we expand it a little and follow the model of Dr. James Dobson \u2013 a colleague of Mary\u2019s who is well known, is a teacher, writer and someone who founded a charity.  I would encourage you to read the Dobson intro and see the parallels between Jim\u2019s lead and the lead I am proposing today.  Since there are no criticisms of the Dobson lead, I thought it would be a good model. Please feel free to share your thoughts \u2026 thanks.  +++$+++ :::I have added back some material (the middle paragraph) ofyour work in the Career section that I feel is essential.  It is factual and well documented. I corrected some typos in the Nurturing Network section.  I feel strongly that we must communicate how the experience of Bendix made Mary a public and historic figure in the context of gaining equality for women in the workplace.  As background, here is a little history that may help you to see that her business experience is pivotal in the feminist movement in this country. She didn’t plan it that way; but she became a pioneer.  Her story isn’t important because the media went bananas and the country was curious; it is important because it was a pivotal event in the feminist movement.  When her blonde head hit the glass ceiling, all hell broke loss and women who were earning half as much as men for the same job all cheered. It created a country wide "wake up call" that the good old boy network was a thing of the past - that female colleagues would be treated respectfully and professionaly.  Silly today, I know.  But this was how it was in the 80's. We had to learn.  Cunningham wrote about the experience, landed on her feet after being much sought after by other Fortune 100 companies.  She had a successful career with Seagram developing their world wide strategy.  She left all of that to found a successful international charity that has been a resource for women for 25 years. This is what we need to capture in words that conform to Wiki guidelines.  I look forward to having your help in accomplishing this. It might be worth mentioning that today the Bendix story would almost seem quaint – a woman has frequent access to her boss and 2-3 years later they get married.  No big deal.  The 80’s was an entirely different ballgame.  That is the reason that Gloria Steinem – a leading feminist – came to Cunningham’s defense.  And why that documented fact is important to include.  It is about feminism and who the early pioneers were.  This is core material in the story. Rather than diminish the lead paragraph in Agee’s article, I am proposing that we expand it a little and follow the model of Dr. James Dobson – a colleague of Mary’s who is well known, is a teacher, writer and someone who founded a charity.  I would encourage you to read the Dobson intro and see the parallels between Jim’s lead and the lead I am proposing today.  Since there are no criticisms of the Dobson lead, I thought it would be a good model. Please feel free to share your thoughts … thanks. [[User:Omnibus170|Omnibus170]] ([[User talk:Omnibus170|talk]]) 01:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
17953 +++$+++ Omnibus170 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17950 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.308642300E09 +++$+++ It is factually inaccurate to remove all of Agee's teaching - speaking, writing, articles etc. from her article, as this element of her professional life over that past twenty five years is central to her story.  Because it responds to one of the core mission elements of the Nurturing Network (education), I have included some key information in that section. One short paragraph re: key addresses is more about honors (i.e. Commonweath Club and others)than TNN's mission, so I included it in the Honors section.  (The last 7 US Presidents have addressed the Commonweath Club. It was a high honor for young professional woman.)  The Pope does not invite just anyone to give two address to Forums in Rome.  These are important to include. Same with the Supreme Court. Does that seem like a good distinction to you between honors and teaching and motivational speaking that is related to TNN? I continue to remove adjectives that are the least bit superlative. Do you have a comfort level now with both NPOV and reading like a story not a resume?  If you do, please feel free to remove the warning banners.  If you don't, please let me know where you see a shortcoming and I will work on it.  +++$+++ :::::It is factually inaccurate to remove all of Agee's teaching - speaking, writing, articles etc. from her article, as this element of her professional life over that past twenty five years is central to her story.  Because it responds to one of the core mission elements of the Nurturing Network (education), I have included some key information in that section. One short paragraph re: key addresses is more about honors (i.e. Commonweath Club and others)than TNN's mission, so I included it in the Honors section.  (The last 7 US Presidents have addressed the Commonweath Club. It was a high honor for young professional woman.)  The Pope does not invite just anyone to give two address to Forums in Rome.  These are important to include. Same with the Supreme Court. Does that seem like a good distinction to you between honors and teaching and motivational speaking that is related to TNN? I continue to remove adjectives that are the least bit superlative. Do you have a comfort level now with both NPOV and reading like a story not a resume?  If you do, please feel free to remove the warning banners.  If you don't, please let me know where you see a shortcoming and I will work on it. [[User:Omnibus170|Omnibus170]] ([[User talk:Omnibus170|talk]]) 00:45, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
17954 +++$+++ Omnibus170 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17950 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.308965280E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your advice and have worked diligently to add references to this article that Wikipedia has designated as sub-standard for this reason. Could I ask you to please look at this article again and evaluate my success?  Have I accomplished what is required? Does it honor NPOV standards while still telling the story of an historic figure in the women's movement?  I have read dozens of other articles and Wikipedia guidelines and have tried diligently to compensate for any tendency toward COI.  It is my longstanding professional relationship with Ms. Agee gives me access to the references that are necessary for a well documented article.  I have added references by a factor of 6 or 7, added page numbers where I have them, removed every adjective that could remotely present a \"glowing\" report - trying in every way possible to meet Wikipedia standards for encyclopedic tone. (One exception might be mentioning 3 other women among the 60 starting with Betsy Ross in the Cullen-DuPont Anthology. I included that mention mostly for the benefit of other editors who may have missed the 80's and not realize Agee's prominence as an advocate for women. The anthology is an important reference but the names of the other women could be deleted if you feel it isn\u2019t appropriate.)  Will you please take an interest in this article and promptly evaluate if it now meets standards so both banners can be removed?  This article reflects only a small percentage of the material in Ms. Agee's Curriculum Vitae and, I believe, now reads like a NPOV story of an historic person in the woman's movement.  I cannot believe that adding more articles (which I could do) would increase credibility.  It is already factual, credible and well documented.  I am hoping that you agree and can remove the warnings promptly.  If I still need help understanding NPOV or encyclopedic tone, please help with that. Thanks so much.  +++$+++ ::::::I appreciate your advice and have worked diligently to add references to this article that Wikipedia has designated as sub-standard for this reason. Could I ask you to please look at this article again and evaluate my success?  Have I accomplished what is required? Does it honor NPOV standards while still telling the story of an historic figure in the women's movement?  I have read dozens of other articles and Wikipedia guidelines and have tried diligently to compensate for any tendency toward COI.  It is my longstanding professional relationship with Ms. Agee gives me access to the references that are necessary for a well documented article.  I have added references by a factor of 6 or 7, added page numbers where I have them, removed every adjective that could remotely present a "glowing" report - trying in every way possible to meet Wikipedia standards for encyclopedic tone. (One exception might be mentioning 3 other women among the 60 starting with Betsy Ross in the Cullen-DuPont Anthology. I included that mention mostly for the benefit of other editors who may have missed the 80's and not realize Agee's prominence as an advocate for women. The anthology is an important reference but the names of the other women could be deleted if you feel it isn’t appropriate.)  Will you please take an interest in this article and promptly evaluate if it now meets standards so both banners can be removed?  This article reflects only a small percentage of the material in Ms. Agee's Curriculum Vitae and, I believe, now reads like a NPOV story of an historic person in the woman's movement.  I cannot believe that adding more articles (which I could do) would increase credibility.  It is already factual, credible and well documented.  I am hoping that you agree and can remove the warnings promptly.  If I still need help understanding NPOV or encyclopedic tone, please help with that. Thanks so much. [[User:Omnibus170|Omnibus170]] ([[User talk:Omnibus170|talk]]) 18:28, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
17955 +++$+++ Omnibus170 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17950 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.309304160E09 +++$+++ Spanglej, I appreciate your advice and, in particular, your willingness to work on the Mary Cunningham Agee article so that it does meet objectivity standards. I honestly don't know what isn't acceptable and which accomplishments anyone would question.  I don't know how to put a COI tag on my talk page nor do I fully understand how that will help to rid the article of \"resume\" tendency.  My goal is to participate (with someone or someones) who definitely have a neutral point of view and substantial Wikipedia experience to order to convey Mrs. Agee's accomplishments appropriately.  Yes, I fully understand that someone can present information that casts Mrs. Agee is a negative light.  If \/ when that happens, we can and will examine their objectivity \/ neutrality and the quality of their sources.  I understand.  My immediate goal is get someone's help in presenting the material that I currently have a knowledge of and know to be accurate in an acceptable encyclopedic style and then have someone other than me remove the warning banner. And then on with the process ... however that unfolds. Really appreciate your interest and help.  +++$+++ ::::::::Spanglej, I appreciate your advice and, in particular, your willingness to work on the Mary Cunningham Agee article so that it does meet objectivity standards. I honestly don't know what isn't acceptable and which accomplishments anyone would question.  I don't know how to put a COI tag on my talk page nor do I fully understand how that will help to rid the article of "resume" tendency.  My goal is to participate (with someone or someones) who definitely have a neutral point of view and substantial Wikipedia experience to order to convey Mrs. Agee's accomplishments appropriately.  Yes, I fully understand that someone can present information that casts Mrs. Agee is a negative light.  If / when that happens, we can and will examine their objectivity / neutrality and the quality of their sources.  I understand.  My immediate goal is get someone's help in presenting the material that I currently have a knowledge of and know to be accurate in an acceptable encyclopedic style and then have someone other than me remove the warning banner. And then on with the process ... however that unfolds. Really appreciate your interest and help. [[User:Omnibus170|Omnibus170]] ([[User talk:Omnibus170|talk]]) 16:36, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

280097 +++$+++ 71.36.255.217 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-23 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.201093620E09 +++$+++ Just out of curiosity, what objection did you have to my addition to the Prime Number page? --[[Special:Contributions\/71.36.255.217|71.36.255.217]] ( +++$+++ Just out of curiosity, what objection did you have to my addition to the Prime Number page? --[[Special:Contributions/71.36.255.217|71.36.255.217]] ([[User talk:71.36.255.217|talk]]) 05:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
280098 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280097 +++$+++ 280097 +++$+++ 2008-01-23 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.201137660E09 +++$+++ It didn't seem serious.  +++$+++ :It didn't seem serious. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

17956 +++$+++ Dbunkley6 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17956 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-23 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.308879720E09 +++$+++ next time b4 u think i made all the edits on Danny Devito, look at my contributions, then check on the contributions the people made b4 me. All i did was give the right birthday in the infobox. Sorry u got confused.  +++$+++ next time b4 u think i made all the edits on Danny Devito, look at my contributions, then check on the contributions the people made b4 me. All i did was give the right birthday in the infobox. Sorry u got confused. [[User:Dbunkley6|Dbunkley6]] ([[User talk:Dbunkley6|talk]]) 18:42, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
17957 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17956 +++$+++ 17956 +++$+++ 2011-06-23 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.308882720E09 +++$+++ My apologies, it was the edits of the IP before you I was reverting. Sorry. Best wishes  +++$+++ :My apologies, it was the edits of the IP before you I was reverting. Sorry. Best wishes [[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]]) 19:32, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

17958 +++$+++ Mabuska +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-27 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.309212780E09 +++$+++ For your information i reverted a bold edit made by AMacR and have already joined the discussion on the talk page in regards to [[C. S. Lewis]]. How does a bold edit by AMacR that has no consensus have more weight than me applying [[WP:BRD]]? If there is a disagreement with something in an article it is customary to revert to what was there before the issue was raised until the issue is sorted.  +++$+++ For your information i reverted a bold edit made by AMacR and have already joined the discussion on the talk page in regards to [[C. S. Lewis]]. How does a bold edit by AMacR that has no consensus have more weight than me applying [[WP:BRD]]? If there is a disagreement with something in an article it is customary to revert to what was there before the issue was raised until the issue is sorted. [[User:Mabuska|Mabuska]] <sup>[[User_talk:Mabuska|(talk)]]</sup> 15:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
17959 +++$+++ Mabuska +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17958 +++$+++ 17958 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.309243860E09 +++$+++ No problems. Stating he's British is the most accurate term as he is a British national and according to the manual of style for biographies we shouldn't mention ethnciity or country of birth in the lede unless its relevant to the article. His ethnicity was never a major issue in his life going by the article so it can be deemed as not relevant.  +++$+++ :No problems. Stating he's British is the most accurate term as he is a British national and according to the manual of style for biographies we shouldn't mention ethnciity or country of birth in the lede unless its relevant to the article. His ethnicity was never a major issue in his life going by the article so it can be deemed as not relevant. [[User:Mabuska|Mabuska]] <sup>[[User_talk:Mabuska|(talk)]]</sup> 23:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

17960 +++$+++ 188.23.211.222 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-27 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.309236840E09 +++$+++ Stop reverting my edits to the tim robbins page or you need to get blocked. Height informations are added by the most celebrities. [[Special:Contributions\/188.23.211.222|188.23.211.222]] ( +++$+++ Stop reverting my edits to the tim robbins page or you need to get blocked. Height informations are added by the most celebrities. [[Special:Contributions/188.23.211.222|188.23.211.222]] ([[User talk:188.23.211.222|talk]]) 21:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
17961 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17960 +++$+++ 17960 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.309243200E09 +++$+++ Please [[WP:AGF|assume the good faith]] of other editors. I did not revert your edit, I added a reference  from a newspaper to validate your edit.  +++$+++ :Please [[WP:AGF|assume the good faith]] of other editors. I did not revert your edit, I added a reference  from a newspaper to validate your edit. [[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej#top|talk]]) 23:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

280105 +++$+++ FloNight +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-04 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.202184660E09 +++$+++ Very glad to see you working on the IRC case. Working together I hope we can resolve the core issues in the case.  Take care,  +++$+++ Very glad to see you working on the IRC case. Working together I hope we can resolve the core issues in the case.  Take care, [[User:FloNight|FloNight]][[User talk:FloNight|&#9829;&#9829;&#9829;]] 20:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
280106 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280105 +++$+++ 280105 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.202188860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
280107 +++$+++ FloNight +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280105 +++$+++ 280106 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.202194860E09 +++$+++ And since I respond to most thread on the mailing list, of course I'm aware of your level of participation in the discussions. ;-)  +++$+++ ::And since I respond to most thread on the mailing list, of course I'm aware of your level of participation in the discussions. ;-) [[User:FloNight|FloNight]][[User talk:FloNight|&#9829;&#9829;&#9829;]] 23:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
280108 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280105 +++$+++ 280107 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.202195100E09 +++$+++ Of course, that should have been \"imply\" above. I'm glad you're glad ;-)  +++$+++ :::Of course, that should have been "imply" above. I'm glad you're glad ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
280109 +++$+++ FloNight +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280105 +++$+++ 280108 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.202195580E09 +++$+++ ;-)  +++$+++ :::: ;-) [[User:FloNight|FloNight]][[User talk:FloNight|&#9829;&#9829;&#9829;]] 23:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

562266 +++$+++ Aaroncrick +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ 562266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-14 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.239734340E09 +++$+++ We have some massive suburbs here in Launnie ;) ''' +++$+++ We have some massive suburbs here in Launnie ;) '''[[user:Aaroncrick|<span style="font-family:Rockwell;color:#E49B0F">Aaroncrick</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Aaroncrick|<span style="font-family:Rockwell;color:#FE2712">(Tassie Boy talk)</span>]]</sup>''' 11:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
562267 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ 562266 +++$+++ 562266 +++$+++ 2009-04-14 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.239735120E09 +++$+++ [[Willetton, Western Australia|Willetton]], [[Dianella, Western Australia|Dianella]] and [[Thornlie, Western Australia|Thornlie]] leave em for dead though :)  +++$+++ : [[Willetton, Western Australia|Willetton]], [[Dianella, Western Australia|Dianella]] and [[Thornlie, Western Australia|Thornlie]] leave em for dead though :) [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 11:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
562268 +++$+++ Aaroncrick +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ 562266 +++$+++ 562267 +++$+++ 2009-04-14 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.239735960E09 +++$+++ And here we average about 200 people! lol ''' +++$+++ :: And here we average about 200 people! lol '''[[user:Aaroncrick|<span style="font-family:Rockwell;color:#E49B0F">Aaroncrick</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Aaroncrick|<span style="font-family:Rockwell;color:#FE2712">(Tassie Boy talk)</span>]]</sup>''' 12:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
562269 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ 562266 +++$+++ 562268 +++$+++ 2009-04-14 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.239737880E09 +++$+++ Forgot [[Duncraig, Western Australia|Duncraig]] too.  +++$+++ ::: Forgot [[Duncraig, Western Australia|Duncraig]] too. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 12:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
562270 +++$+++ Aaroncrick +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ 562266 +++$+++ 562269 +++$+++ 2009-04-14 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.239738120E09 +++$+++ Same size of some of our cities! ''' +++$+++ :::: Same size of some of our cities! '''[[user:Aaroncrick|<span style="font-family:Rockwell;color:#E49B0F">Aaroncrick</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Aaroncrick|<span style="font-family:Rockwell;color:#FE2712">(Tassie Boy talk)</span>]]</sup>''' 12:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

17965 +++$+++ Mathiasrex +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.309739940E09 +++$+++ OK sorry, i will amend these arts with sources (diaries of Iwaszkiewicz and Malinowski etc.)  +++$+++ OK sorry, i will amend these arts with sources (diaries of Iwaszkiewicz and Malinowski etc.) [[User:Mathiasrex|Mathiasrex]] ([[User talk:Mathiasrex|talk]]) 17:39, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
17966 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17965 +++$+++ 17965 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.309749420E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ :Thank you. [[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej#top|talk]]) 20:17, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

17968 +++$+++ Cpsa +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17968 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.310695800E09 +++$+++ I leave this to you to sort out.  +++$+++ I leave this to you to sort out. [[User:Cpsa|Cpsa]] ([[User talk:Cpsa|talk]]) 19:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
17969 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17968 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.310696580E09 +++$+++ Thanks. <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]])</font> 19:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

90376 +++$+++ Smkolins +++$+++ Wiki-uk +++$+++ 90376 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-24 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.303671060E09 +++$+++ There are references to 1,290 days in \"God Passes By\", on pages 110 and 151. In these passages, Shoghi Effendi confirms that the Declaration of Baha'u'llah in Baghdad, which occurred in 1863 (1280 A.H.), represents the fulfilment of the 1,290 days. <\/blockquote> from [http:\/\/bahai-library.com\/uhj\/beckwith.daniel.prophecy.html] but it's probably the letter from the research dept could be used directly. Say something like Baha'i authorities have linked this event with the \"1290 days\" prophecy from.... Specifically that the dates are calculated, in typical Baha'i fashion, across religions.... something like that. There might also be a line or so about Mormon prophecies - need a better source but consider [http:\/\/bci.org\/prophecy-fulfilled\/mormon.htm] as a starting point(the bit about wearing red dyed garments.)  +++$+++ There are references to 1,290 days in "God Passes By", on pages 110 and 151. In these passages, Shoghi Effendi confirms that the Declaration of Baha'u'llah in Baghdad, which occurred in 1863 (1280 A.H.), represents the fulfilment of the 1,290 days. </blockquote> from [http://bahai-library.com/uhj/beckwith.daniel.prophecy.html] but it's probably the letter from the research dept could be used directly. Say something like Baha'i authorities have linked this event with the "1290 days" prophecy from.... Specifically that the dates are calculated, in typical Baha'i fashion, across religions.... something like that. There might also be a line or so about Mormon prophecies - need a better source but consider [http://bci.org/prophecy-fulfilled/mormon.htm] as a starting point(the bit about wearing red dyed garments.) [[User:Smkolins|Smkolins]] ([[User talk:Smkolins|talk]]) 11:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
90377 +++$+++ Dragfyre +++$+++ Wiki-uk +++$+++ 90376 +++$+++ 90376 +++$+++ 2011-04-24 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.303677540E09 +++$+++ By the way, the Garden article as it stands has just passed DYK (!! goes so fast nowadays), which means we can take a little breath before continuing if we'd like ;) --''' +++$+++ :By the way, the Garden article as it stands has just passed DYK (!! goes so fast nowadays), which means we can take a little breath before continuing if we'd like ;) --'''[[User:Dragfyre|dragfyre]]'''_<span style="font-size:70%">[[User_talk:Dragfyre|ʞןɐʇ]]</span><span style="font-size:70%;vertical-align:top">[[Special:Contributions/Dragfyre|c]]</span> 13:39, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
90378 +++$+++ Dragfyre +++$+++ Wiki-uk +++$+++ 90376 +++$+++ 90377 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.303783620E09 +++$+++ FYI, the DYK for [[Garden of Ridv\xe1n, Baghdad]] will go up on the main page on [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#29_April|April 29th]], to coincide with the 9th day of Ridv\xe1n. Good work again! --''' +++$+++ ::FYI, the DYK for [[Garden of Ridván, Baghdad]] will go up on the main page on [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#29_April|April 29th]], to coincide with the 9th day of Ridván. Good work again! --'''[[User:Dragfyre|dragfyre]]'''_<span style="font-size:70%">[[User_talk:Dragfyre|ʞןɐʇ]]</span><span style="font-size:70%;vertical-align:top">[[Special:Contributions/Dragfyre|c]]</span> 19:07, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

17970 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.311060060E09 +++$+++ You're [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Pierce_Brosnan&diff=prev&oldid=440074269 right], but that doesn't make it appropriate to use rollback. Btw, since the editor seems quite persistent, you might like to leave them a note explaining our practices when it comes to nationality and citizenship in the lead before things deteriorate. All the best,  +++$+++ You're [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pierce_Brosnan&diff=prev&oldid=440074269 right], but that doesn't make it appropriate to use rollback. Btw, since the editor seems quite persistent, you might like to leave them a note explaining our practices when it comes to nationality and citizenship in the lead before things deteriorate. All the best, [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  00:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
17971 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17970 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311344880E09 +++$+++ Thanks. <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]])</font> 07:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
17972 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17970 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311344880E09 +++$+++ No worries. Best wishes <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::No worries. Best wishes <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]])</font> 07:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

17973 +++$+++ WikiTryHardDieHard +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.311122100E09 +++$+++ Hi Spanglej, Thank you for taking the time to inform me about the reasoning behind red links. I hadn't that they were unlinked on purpose. It was my impression that they were links to articles which had existed but at some point were deleted. Like you said, I have edited a significant amount of these red links recently. These mistakes will be promptly reverted back to their original format. Thanks again.  +++$+++ Hi Spanglej, Thank you for taking the time to inform me about the reasoning behind red links. I hadn't that they were unlinked on purpose. It was my impression that they were links to articles which had existed but at some point were deleted. Like you said, I have edited a significant amount of these red links recently. These mistakes will be promptly reverted back to their original format. Thanks again. [[User:WikiTryHardDieHard|WikiTryHardDieHard]] ([[User talk:WikiTryHardDieHard|talk]]) 17:35, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
17974 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311344880E09 +++$+++ No worries. Best wishes <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::No worries. Best wishes <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]])</font> 07:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
17975 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.312433640E09 +++$+++ Hello S. It looks like the persistent IP hopper from earlier this year has returned with this user name{{userlinks|DisneyChicago99}}. I notified the admin who has worked on this before at this thread [[User talk:Ponyo#Gregory Peck.27s Signature]]. I don't know what else there is to do at the moment but I wanted to let you know what is going on. Thanks for your time.  +++$+++ :::Hello S. It looks like the persistent IP hopper from earlier this year has returned with this user name{{userlinks|DisneyChicago99}}. I notified the admin who has worked on this before at this thread [[User talk:Ponyo#Gregory Peck.27s Signature]]. I don't know what else there is to do at the moment but I wanted to let you know what is going on. Thanks for your time. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 21:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

280118 +++$+++ Hans Adler +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-17 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.205820600E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the mistake. I had never noticed this long comment before, and I overlooked the SGML quotes and the template. I guess the IP wanted to fix the issues arising from the long Google Books URLs and got similarly confused. -- +++$+++ Sorry for the mistake. I had never noticed this long comment before, and I overlooked the SGML quotes and the template. I guess the IP wanted to fix the issues arising from the long Google Books URLs and got similarly confused. --[[User:Hans Adler|Hans Adler]] ([[User talk:Hans Adler|talk]]) 23:10, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
280119 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280118 +++$+++ 280118 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.205828400E09 +++$+++ OK.  +++$+++ :OK. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 01:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

17976 +++$+++ Jpcohen +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.311352980E09 +++$+++ Just curious: why did you re-add the \"Novels Portal\"? Does it really belong here? The \"See Also\" section was for an entry that was deleted. So it doesn't make sense to maintain this section for a link to a Novels Portal. Wouldn't a Novels Portal be more appropriate as a link in an article for one of Bukowski's novels? +++$+++ Just curious: why did you re-add the "Novels Portal"? Does it really belong here? The "See Also" section was for an entry that was deleted. So it doesn't make sense to maintain this section for a link to a Novels Portal. Wouldn't a Novels Portal be more appropriate as a link in an article for one of Bukowski's novels?[[User:Jpcohen|Jpcohen]] ([[User talk:Jpcohen|talk]]) 09:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
17977 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17976 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.311356760E09 +++$+++ Yes, it's not so good to have a 'see also' section with nothing in it. I moved the portal down. Other novelists have lit portals such as [[D. H. Lawrence]], [[Margaret Atwood]] and [[Philip K. Dick]] so it seems fine to keep it, to me. <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::Yes, it's not so good to have a 'see also' section with nothing in it. I moved the portal down. Other novelists have lit portals such as [[D. H. Lawrence]], [[Margaret Atwood]] and [[Philip K. Dick]] so it seems fine to keep it, to me. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]])</font> 10:46, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

115297 +++$+++ HeartofaDog +++$+++ David Edgar +++$+++ 115297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-19 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.290202020E09 +++$+++ It was agreed some time ago in relation to French castles - [[:User:Emeraude]] can doubtless point you to the reference - that because the word ''ch\xe2teau'' is wider in meaning than the English word \"castle\", it was decided to leave ''ch\xe2teaux'' in their French-language form. There was no discussion at the time about Belgium, but it seems entirely logical that ''ch\xe2teaux'' in Wallonia should also keep their French-language form. This was my thinking behind what I had started to do, if time had allowed, with [[:List of castles in Belgium]]. (As it stands it is very flawed but nevertheless better than what was there before).  +++$+++ It was agreed some time ago in relation to French castles - [[:User:Emeraude]] can doubtless point you to the reference - that because the word ''château'' is wider in meaning than the English word "castle", it was decided to leave ''châteaux'' in their French-language form. There was no discussion at the time about Belgium, but it seems entirely logical that ''châteaux'' in Wallonia should also keep their French-language form. This was my thinking behind what I had started to do, if time had allowed, with [[:List of castles in Belgium]]. (As it stands it is very flawed but nevertheless better than what was there before). [[User:HeartofaDog|HeartofaDog]] ([[User talk:HeartofaDog|talk]]) 13:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
115298 +++$+++ David Edgar +++$+++ David Edgar +++$+++ 115297 +++$+++ 115297 +++$+++ 2010-11-19 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.290202740E09 +++$+++ I've no problem with ''ch\xe2teaux'' being used instead of 'castle' where it's more appropriate. My issue with [[:List of castles in Belgium]] is that it has a huge number of red links, even though many of the pages actually exist (and are listed in [[:Category:Castles in Belgium]]) under different titles. That's what I've been changing; I've generally only changed the names in the list to follow the names currently used for the articles. -- +++$+++ :I've no problem with ''châteaux'' being used instead of 'castle' where it's more appropriate. My issue with [[:List of castles in Belgium]] is that it has a huge number of red links, even though many of the pages actually exist (and are listed in [[:Category:Castles in Belgium]]) under different titles. That's what I've been changing; I've generally only changed the names in the list to follow the names currently used for the articles. --[[User:David Edgar|David Edgar]] ([[User talk:David Edgar#top|talk]]) 13:39, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

17978 +++$+++ Sloggerbum +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17978 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.311490200E09 +++$+++ And yes, I will have sugar with that. ''' +++$+++ And yes, I will have sugar with that. '''[[User:Sloggerbum|<font color="green">Sloggerbum</font>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Sloggerbum|<font color="maroon">talk</font>]])</small> 23:50, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
17979 +++$+++ Pinkadelica +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17978 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312098420E09 +++$+++ Hi. Regarding your message about the \"Native Mexican descent\" category, I'd say that the user claiming that sourcing this kind of category based on a subject's looks is missing the whole point of [[WP:V]], and you were correct to revert. As for the African American category being the user's example for including this category, I know a user who often challenges that particular category in articles forcing others to provide a source to support its inclusion despite the fact that the subject really looks African American and is pretty much known as such. While it is annoying to track down a source that states Beyonce is in fact a black woman (just an example), it is something that can be challenged by anyone and should be sourced. Same goes for this Native Mexican decent category which, in my opinion, is a lot less obvious. The user needs to provide a source to support its inclusion or they need to stop adding it. If you need any additional input, please let me know. '''<font color=\"MediumSlateBlue\" face=\"Tahoma\"> +++$+++ ::Hi. Regarding your message about the "Native Mexican descent" category, I'd say that the user claiming that sourcing this kind of category based on a subject's looks is missing the whole point of [[WP:V]], and you were correct to revert. As for the African American category being the user's example for including this category, I know a user who often challenges that particular category in articles forcing others to provide a source to support its inclusion despite the fact that the subject really looks African American and is pretty much known as such. While it is annoying to track down a source that states Beyonce is in fact a black woman (just an example), it is something that can be challenged by anyone and should be sourced. Same goes for this Native Mexican decent category which, in my opinion, is a lot less obvious. The user needs to provide a source to support its inclusion or they need to stop adding it. If you need any additional input, please let me know. '''<font color="MediumSlateBlue" face="Tahoma">[[User:Pinkadelica|Pinkadelica]]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Pinkadelica|♣]]</font></sup>''' 00:47, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

17981 +++$+++ Prince Philip of Greece +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17981 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.312232580E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your help & advice.  +++$+++ Thank you for your help & advice. [[User:Prince Philip of Greece|Prince_Philip_of_Greece]] ([[User talk:Prince Philip of Greece|talk]]) 14:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
17982 +++$+++ Prince Philip of Greece +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17981 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 08:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312300020E09 +++$+++ Is a state funeral for Thatcher now an accepted fact? I thought it was merely under discussion? This article is the most recent I can find; it suggests a definite position has not been reached\/confirmed\/announced. http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/article-1034634\/Lady-Thatcher-honoured-State-funeral.html  +++$+++ ::Is a state funeral for Thatcher now an accepted fact? I thought it was merely under discussion? This article is the most recent I can find; it suggests a definite position has not been reached/confirmed/announced. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1034634/Lady-Thatcher-honoured-State-funeral.html [[User:Prince Philip of Greece|Prince_Philip_of_Greece]] ([[User talk:Prince Philip of Greece|talk]]) 08:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

17983 +++$+++ Phaeton23 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.312336620E09 +++$+++ No problem at all. Just trying to help. Are you a Stoppard fan?  +++$+++ No problem at all. Just trying to help. Are you a Stoppard fan? [[User:Phaeton23|Phaeton23]] ([[User talk:Phaeton23|talk]]) 18:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
17984 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17983 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.312346400E09 +++$+++ I'm a huge fan. Going to see [[Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead|R&GRD]] on Friday. I saw Tom a little while ago, lounging outside a pub near me, having a sneaky fag. We exchanged smiles. You are helping. <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::I'm a huge fan. Going to see [[Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead|R&GRD]] on Friday. I saw Tom a little while ago, lounging outside a pub near me, having a sneaky fag. We exchanged smiles. You are helping. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]])</font> 21:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

280128 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280128 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-25 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.209159120E09 +++$+++ A discussion is ongoing at [[Wikipedia_talk:RFA#BAG_requests_process]] to have checkusers elected to their positions rather than have them appointed. Apparently, none of the proponents of doing this have notified ArbCom of this effort. I am therefore informing you. Thank you, -- +++$+++ A discussion is ongoing at [[Wikipedia_talk:RFA#BAG_requests_process]] to have checkusers elected to their positions rather than have them appointed. Apparently, none of the proponents of doing this have notified ArbCom of this effort. I am therefore informing you. Thank you, --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 14:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
280129 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280128 +++$+++ 280128 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.209164700E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

17985 +++$+++ Linguogeek +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17985 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312352520E09 +++$+++ Hi - my two edits to [[Williams syndrome]] came from ''The Language Instinct''. I have that book at my other house right now. The quotes I got came from a form of the book I searched on Google Books, but for some reason it didn't give me the numbers of the pages. Perhaps someone has the book and can find which page it is on?  +++$+++ Hi - my two edits to [[Williams syndrome]] came from ''The Language Instinct''. I have that book at my other house right now. The quotes I got came from a form of the book I searched on Google Books, but for some reason it didn't give me the numbers of the pages. Perhaps someone has the book and can find which page it is on? [[User:Linguogeek|Linguogeek]] ([[User talk:Linguogeek|talk]]) 23:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
17986 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17985 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.312379340E09 +++$+++ I added them. <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::I added them. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]])</font> 06:49, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

280130 +++$+++ Nsk92 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-27 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.209313800E09 +++$+++ You forgot to sign your vote at  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Induced homomorphism]]. I could sign it for you but it always looks better if the vote is signed by the original poster. Regards,  +++$+++ You forgot to sign your vote at  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Induced homomorphism]]. I could sign it for you but it always looks better if the vote is signed by the original poster. Regards, [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 09:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
280131 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280130 +++$+++ 280130 +++$+++ 2008-04-27 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.209327720E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I've signed on the dotted line ;-)  +++$+++ :Thanks. I've signed on the dotted line ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:22, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

17987 +++$+++ Griswaldo +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.312495080E09 +++$+++ Edit warring is in and of itself bad, but edit warring to maintain controversial material in a BLP is a serious offense.  I highly suggest you make your case on [[Talk:Melanie Phillips]] and do not revert again.  Cheers. +++$+++ Edit warring is in and of itself bad, but edit warring to maintain controversial material in a BLP is a serious offense.  I highly suggest you make your case on [[Talk:Melanie Phillips]] and do not revert again.  Cheers.[[User:Griswaldo|Griswaldo]] ([[User talk:Griswaldo|talk]]) 14:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
17988 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17987 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.312508160E09 +++$+++ I would back up a bit. I did not war, I reverted once. It is useful to discuss your mass deletions on an article talk page, even with BLPs. Please be careful what accusations you level at other editors. Thank you. <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::I would back up a bit. I did not war, I reverted once. It is useful to discuss your mass deletions on an article talk page, even with BLPs. Please be careful what accusations you level at other editors. Thank you. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]])</font> 18:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
17989 +++$+++ Griswaldo +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17987 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312508460E09 +++$+++ Did I say that you were already edit warring? Making a change and then reverting after you were reverted is the path to edit warring, something I was cautioning you against. If you were to follow [[WP:BRD]] you'd go to the talk page instead. Please be careful to accuse people of leveling accusations that they have actually leveled. Cheers. +++$+++ :::Did I say that you were already edit warring? Making a change and then reverting after you were reverted is the path to edit warring, something I was cautioning you against. If you were to follow [[WP:BRD]] you'd go to the talk page instead. Please be careful to accuse people of leveling accusations that they have actually leveled. Cheers.[[User:Griswaldo|Griswaldo]] ([[User talk:Griswaldo|talk]]) 18:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
17990 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17987 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.312552680E09 +++$+++ I had not [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Melanie_Phillips&action=history previously been reverted]. The edit of Aug 1st was to do with a prize not Breivik content and that edit still stands. <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::::I had not [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Melanie_Phillips&action=history previously been reverted]. The edit of Aug 1st was to do with a prize not Breivik content and that edit still stands. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]])</font> 06:58, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

280132 +++$+++ SomeUsr +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-29 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.209532140E09 +++$+++ Reverted vandalism on your User page, just to let ya' know :-) . see ya'. <small><span style=\"border:1px green;background:orange;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Reverted vandalism on your User page, just to let ya' know :-) . see ya'. <small><span style="border:1px green;background:orange;padding:1px;">[[User:SomeUsr|<b>SomeUsr</b>]] | [[User_talk:SomeUsr|<font style="color:white;background:lightblue;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]][[Special:Contributions/SomeUsr|Contribs]]</span></small> 22:09, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
280133 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280132 +++$+++ 280132 +++$+++ 2008-04-29 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.209532920E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
280134 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280132 +++$+++ 280132 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.209542580E09 +++$+++ You're welcome.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 01:03, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

542278 +++$+++ JForget +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-03 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.199417520E09 +++$+++ A page on [[Order of the White Star|that subject]] already exists since 2003 but I see your page has more info so it can be added. -- +++$+++ A page on [[Order of the White Star|that subject]] already exists since 2003 but I see your page has more info so it can be added. --[[User:JForget|<font color = "orange">'''JForget''' </font>]] 19:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
542279 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542278 +++$+++ 542278 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.199418060E09 +++$+++ Done.   +++$+++ :Done.  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 19:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
542280 +++$+++ JForget +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542278 +++$+++ 542279 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.199418240E09 +++$+++ Thanks Dreadstar, you were faster then me on that one - actually I was doing the operation the bit slower way.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks Dreadstar, you were faster then me on that one - actually I was doing the operation the bit slower way.--[[User:JForget|<font color = "orange">'''JForget''' </font>]] 19:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

17991 +++$+++ SP-KP +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.312502340E09 +++$+++ Hi. I've started a discussion at [[Talk:Melanie Phillips]] about whether it's appropriate to mention her influence on Breivik. It would be useful to have some further details from you as to why you'd like to see the content included.  +++$+++ Hi. I've started a discussion at [[Talk:Melanie Phillips]] about whether it's appropriate to mention her influence on Breivik. It would be useful to have some further details from you as to why you'd like to see the content included. [[User:SP-KP|SP-KP]] ([[User talk:SP-KP|talk]]) 16:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
17992 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17991 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312509360E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I will come along later. Best wishes <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks. I will come along later. Best wishes <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]])</font> 18:56, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

17993 +++$+++ Eversman +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.312518360E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Duncan James]], without giving a valid reason for the removal. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please make use of the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.-- +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Duncan James]], without giving a valid reason for the removal. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please make use of the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--[[User:Eversman|Eversman]] ([[User talk:Eversman|talk]]) 21:26, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
17994 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17993 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.312551720E09 +++$+++ Eversman, I gave a full edit summaries and links to the policy pages for the reasons I deleted the material at [[Duncan James]]. Perhaps you did not see them: \"Remove unsourced cats. Rm unsourced info that is not covered by [[WP:EGRS]]\". [[WP:EGRS]] and [[WP:BLPCAT]] say that information about a subject's sexuality should only be noted if it notable to their public life and that it is self-identified. There is no valid source given in this article for this. The Bisexual categories were also removed for this reason, as stated. Contributors making edits you may not like is not vandalism.<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::Eversman, I gave a full edit summaries and links to the policy pages for the reasons I deleted the material at [[Duncan James]]. Perhaps you did not see them: "Remove unsourced cats. Rm unsourced info that is not covered by [[WP:EGRS]]". [[WP:EGRS]] and [[WP:BLPCAT]] say that information about a subject's sexuality should only be noted if it notable to their public life and that it is self-identified. There is no valid source given in this article for this. The Bisexual categories were also removed for this reason, as stated. Contributors making edits you may not like is not vandalism.<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]])</font> 06:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
17995 +++$+++ Eversman +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17993 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312567800E09 +++$+++ It seems to me that you do not understand very well [[Wikipedia:Categorization\/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality|Categorization of ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality]], as it is stated: ''Categories regarding sexual orientation of a living person should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief or orientation in question (see [[WP:BLPCAT]])''. And since Duncan James has stated in the given reference; '''''I'm bisexual. I've been in loving relationships with men as well as women - and I'm not ashamed. But even though I fancy men, I still fancy women too.''''', it is obvius that you are trying to justify your edits which can be characterized as vandalism. For everything you've deleted there was a valid source, but you have decided to ignore it. Shame is on you, not me, for such unconstructive edit.-- +++$+++ :::It seems to me that you do not understand very well [[Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality|Categorization of ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality]], as it is stated: ''Categories regarding sexual orientation of a living person should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief or orientation in question (see [[WP:BLPCAT]])''. And since Duncan James has stated in the given reference; '''''I'm bisexual. I've been in loving relationships with men as well as women - and I'm not ashamed. But even though I fancy men, I still fancy women too.''''', it is obvius that you are trying to justify your edits which can be characterized as vandalism. For everything you've deleted there was a valid source, but you have decided to ignore it. Shame is on you, not me, for such unconstructive edit.--[[User:Eversman|Eversman]] ([[User talk:Eversman|talk]]) 11:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
17996 +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ Spanglej +++$+++ 17993 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.312596660E09 +++$+++ There is a valid source because [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Duncan_James&action=historysubmit&diff=443080710&oldid=442533615 you just added one yesterday]. Article histories are available for all to view. I gave full edit summaries with links to the guideline pages to explain the edits. You [[WP:IDONTLIKEIT|may not agree]] with my edit but it does not fall into the realm of vandalism. Now there is a citation, yes, but as I have outlined on [[Talk:Duncan James]], James' sexuality is not \"notable to his public life\" re [[WP:BLPCAT]]. <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ ::::There is a valid source because [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Duncan_James&action=historysubmit&diff=443080710&oldid=442533615 you just added one yesterday]. Article histories are available for all to view. I gave full edit summaries with links to the guideline pages to explain the edits. You [[WP:IDONTLIKEIT|may not agree]] with my edit but it does not fall into the realm of vandalism. Now there is a citation, yes, but as I have outlined on [[Talk:Duncan James]], James' sexuality is not "notable to his public life" re [[WP:BLPCAT]]. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Spanglej|Span]] ([[User talk:Spanglej|talk]])</font> 19:11, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

280140 +++$+++ Otolemur crassicaudatus +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280140 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-17 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.211022840E09 +++$+++ Why the quotation in the [[Boston_Massacre#Depictions|Depictions]] section are in bold letters? ''' +++$+++ Why the quotation in the [[Boston_Massacre#Depictions|Depictions]] section are in bold letters? '''[[User:Otolemur crassicaudatus|<font color="002bb8">Otolemur crassicaudatus</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Otolemur crassicaudatus|talk]]) 04:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
280141 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280140 +++$+++ 280140 +++$+++ 2008-05-17 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.211023260E09 +++$+++ The long bolded text begining \"'''THE HORRID MASSACRE''' ...\" is apparently the title of the pamphlet being quoted from.  +++$+++ :The long bolded text begining "'''THE HORRID MASSACRE''' ..." is apparently the title of the pamphlet being quoted from. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

17998 +++$+++ Sisyphos23 +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ 17998 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-02 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.309662240E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | You definitely deserve it because of your enormous contribution to the [[Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab\/Photography_workshop|Graphic Lab]]!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | You definitely deserve it because of your enormous contribution to the [[Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab/Photography_workshop|Graphic Lab]]! [[User:Sisyphos23|Sisyphos23]] ([[User talk:Sisyphos23|talk]]) 20:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
17999 +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ 17998 +++$+++ 17998 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.309780980E09 +++$+++ Wow, thank you so much!!  \u2013&nbsp;<font color=\"#06266f\">Ker\u03b1u<\/font><font color=\"#1240AB\">no\u03c2co<\/font><font color=\"#4671DS\">pia<\/font><font color=\"#A60000\"><sup>\u25c1<\/sup><\/font><i><sub><font color=\"#5E1FFF\"> +++$+++ :Wow, thank you so much!!  –&nbsp;<font color="#06266f">Kerαu</font><font color="#1240AB">noςco</font><font color="#4671DS">pia</font><font color="#A60000"><sup>◁</sup></font><i><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User:Keraunoscopia|gala]][[User talk:Keraunoscopia|xies]]</font></sub></i> 05:03, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
18000 +++$+++ Sisyphos23 +++$+++ Keraunoscopia +++$+++ 17998 +++$+++ 17999 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.310778240E09 +++$+++ I've just noticed it's the Rosetta Barnstar!? Seems like the WikiLove extension is kinda screwed up.-- +++$+++ ::I've just noticed it's the Rosetta Barnstar!? Seems like the WikiLove extension is kinda screwed up.--[[User:Sisyphos23|Sisyphos23]] ([[User talk:Sisyphos23|talk]]) 18:04, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

542287 +++$+++ AKeen +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-04 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.199488200E09 +++$+++ |align=\"center\"|Dear {{BASEPAGENAME}}, Thank you for voting in and co-nominating [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/AKeen|my RfA]], which closed successfully with '''34 support''', '''2 oppose''', and '''0 neutral'''. Thanks especially for the co-nomination - I really appreciate your extra support! I promise I will wield the mop wisely, and do my best to improve Wikipedia. --  +++$+++ |align="center"|Dear {{BASEPAGENAME}}, Thank you for voting in and co-nominating [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AKeen|my RfA]], which closed successfully with '''34 support''', '''2 oppose''', and '''0 neutral'''. Thanks especially for the co-nomination - I really appreciate your extra support! I promise I will wield the mop wisely, and do my best to improve Wikipedia. -- [[User:AKeen|AKeen]] ([[User talk:AKeen|talk]]) 15:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
542288 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542287 +++$+++ 542287 +++$+++ 2008-01-04 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.199506440E09 +++$+++ Don't feel bad, there [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Syrian_%28horse%29&action=history used to be one.]   +++$+++ :Don't feel bad, there [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Syrian_%28horse%29&action=history used to be one.]  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 20:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

280144 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280144 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-21 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.211435820E09 +++$+++ I am an administrator open to recall. I started a page regarding the subject at [[User:John Carter\/Adminship]], indicating that when three editors filed complaints within 90 days, I would ask an uninvolved admin to review the material and make a recommendation. Three such complaints have been lodged. I initially posted this request to the [[User talk:UninvitedCompany#Request for review]], but have since noted that that party is now inactive. I am thus requesting a different party, you, to review the comments and make any recommendation regarding my continued status as an admin that you might see fit to make. Thank you.  +++$+++ I am an administrator open to recall. I started a page regarding the subject at [[User:John Carter/Adminship]], indicating that when three editors filed complaints within 90 days, I would ask an uninvolved admin to review the material and make a recommendation. Three such complaints have been lodged. I initially posted this request to the [[User talk:UninvitedCompany#Request for review]], but have since noted that that party is now inactive. I am thus requesting a different party, you, to review the comments and make any recommendation regarding my continued status as an admin that you might see fit to make. Thank you. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 22:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
280145 +++$+++ John Carter +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280144 +++$+++ 280144 +++$+++ 2008-05-22 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.211440620E09 +++$+++ Also, please be so good as to review [[User:Sarvagnya]]'s recent edits, as I believe he is once again displaying the kind of behavior which prompted the wikiquette alert and failed RfC. Also, the now-deleted [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Sarvagnya]] should be of interest regarding his earlier activity.  +++$+++ :Also, please be so good as to review [[User:Sarvagnya]]'s recent edits, as I believe he is once again displaying the kind of behavior which prompted the wikiquette alert and failed RfC. Also, the now-deleted [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Sarvagnya]] should be of interest regarding his earlier activity. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 00:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

542289 +++$+++ e +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-04 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.199469420E09 +++$+++ Sure, just let me know what users you want to be notified and I can run it for you :) &mdash;  +++$+++ Sure, just let me know what users you want to be notified and I can run it for you :) &mdash; [[User:E|<span style="color:#003366;font-weight:bold">E</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:E|<span style="color:#ED9121">talk</span>]]</sup> 09:57, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
542290 +++$+++ e +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542289 +++$+++ 542289 +++$+++ 2008-01-04 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.199514840E09 +++$+++ I'll start at around 02:00 UTC when I have some spare time. &mdash;  +++$+++ :I'll start at around 02:00 UTC when I have some spare time. &mdash; [[User:E|<span style="color:#003366;font-weight:bold">E</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:E|<span style="color:#ED9121">talk</span>]]</sup> 22:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
542291 +++$+++ e +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542289 +++$+++ 542290 +++$+++ 2008-01-06 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.199607000E09 +++$+++ Apologies, I will perform these tasks now. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::Apologies, I will perform these tasks now. &mdash; [[User:E|<span style="color:#003366;font-weight:bold">E</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:E|<span style="color:#ED9121">talk</span>]]</sup> 00:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

439907 +++$+++ Grimhelm +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ 439907 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-12 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.236843840E09 +++$+++ I wonder if you could help me clear up an issue at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Norse_history_and_culture#Norse_Kings_of_Dublin]]. I have been having trouble with differing sources on the [[Sigtrygg Silkbeard]] and the [[Kings of Dublin]].  Thanks.  -- +++$+++ I wonder if you could help me clear up an issue at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Norse_history_and_culture#Norse_Kings_of_Dublin]]. I have been having trouble with differing sources on the [[Sigtrygg Silkbeard]] and the [[Kings of Dublin]].  Thanks.  --[[User:Grimhelm|Grimhelm]] ([[User talk:Grimhelm|talk]]) 00:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
439908 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ 439907 +++$+++ 439907 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.236904740E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but I know less than you on the subject, and I see that you have received competent help already.-- +++$+++ :I'm sorry, but I know less than you on the subject, and I see that you have received competent help already.--[[User:Berig|Berig]] ([[User talk:Berig#top|talk]]) 17:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
439909 +++$+++ Grimhelm +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ 439907 +++$+++ 439908 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.236904860E09 +++$+++ Well, thank you at least for replying. :-)  -- +++$+++ ::Well, thank you at least for replying. :-)  --[[User:Grimhelm|Grimhelm]] ([[User talk:Grimhelm|talk]]) 17:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

542292 +++$+++ Captain panda +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542292 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-04 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.199517120E09 +++$+++ I am willing to nominate you whenever you wish. I may actually start working on the nomination tonight as it will likely take some time to do. (I have not nominated someone for adminship before.) However, are you certain that you can show in the RfA that you have dealt with the concerns of the opposers? I am not saying that you have not dealt with the concerns, but I am saying that some people may not be convinced that you have. In addition, I would like to ask you about you position in [[WP:BAG]]. From what I have seen, you do not have any experience in running bots or computer programming. My apologies if I am incorrect, but I think that would be a judgment concern to participants in your RfA if you are a member of BAG with little or no bot experience. Can you please clarify this matter to me? Thank you in advance. :) Sorry if that sounded like I was accusing you. I just think that it is better that I point out these concerns to you rather than opposers in your RfA. :)  +++$+++ I am willing to nominate you whenever you wish. I may actually start working on the nomination tonight as it will likely take some time to do. (I have not nominated someone for adminship before.) However, are you certain that you can show in the RfA that you have dealt with the concerns of the opposers? I am not saying that you have not dealt with the concerns, but I am saying that some people may not be convinced that you have. In addition, I would like to ask you about you position in [[WP:BAG]]. From what I have seen, you do not have any experience in running bots or computer programming. My apologies if I am incorrect, but I think that would be a judgment concern to participants in your RfA if you are a member of BAG with little or no bot experience. Can you please clarify this matter to me? Thank you in advance. :) Sorry if that sounded like I was accusing you. I just think that it is better that I point out these concerns to you rather than opposers in your RfA. :) [[User:Captain panda|<font color="orange" face="comic sans ms">Captain</font>]] [[User talk:Captain panda|<font color="red" face="Papyrus">panda</font>]] 23:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
542293 +++$+++ Captain panda +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542292 +++$+++ 542292 +++$+++ 2008-01-04 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.199518800E09 +++$+++ Well those seem to answer my questions very nicely, so I guess that I will get working on the nomination statement. :)  +++$+++ :Well those seem to answer my questions very nicely, so I guess that I will get working on the nomination statement. :) [[User:Captain panda|<font color="orange" face="comic sans ms">Captain</font>]] [[User talk:Captain panda|<font color="red" face="Papyrus">panda</font>]] 23:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
542294 +++$+++ Captain panda +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542292 +++$+++ 542293 +++$+++ 2008-01-05 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.199577660E09 +++$+++ The nomination is complete. Feel free to accept at [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Dreamafter 2]] whenever you are ready. I hope it succeeds!  +++$+++ ::The nomination is complete. Feel free to accept at [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dreamafter 2]] whenever you are ready. I hope it succeeds! [[User:Captain panda|<font color="orange" face="comic sans ms">Captain</font>]] [[User talk:Captain panda|<font color="red" face="Papyrus">panda</font>]] 16:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
542295 +++$+++ GlassCobra +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542292 +++$+++ 542292 +++$+++ 2008-01-05 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.199584200E09 +++$+++ I'm confused. Why was the original version of your second RfA deleted? Just so you know, I do intend to bring up the fact that you have already tried to run a second time if you do not disclose it.  +++$+++ :I'm confused. Why was the original version of your second RfA deleted? Just so you know, I do intend to bring up the fact that you have already tried to run a second time if you do not disclose it. [[User:GlassCobra|Glass]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|Cobra]]''' 17:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
542296 +++$+++ GlassCobra +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542292 +++$+++ 542295 +++$+++ 2008-01-05 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.199597340E09 +++$+++ I have moved the material to the subpage that you specified. I included everything that was said, including votes, and would ask that you make no modifications to it so that everything is visible to all participants.  +++$+++ ::I have moved the material to the subpage that you specified. I included everything that was said, including votes, and would ask that you make no modifications to it so that everything is visible to all participants. [[User:GlassCobra|Glass]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|Cobra]]''' 21:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
542297 +++$+++ GlassCobra +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542292 +++$+++ 542296 +++$+++ 2008-01-05 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.199605260E09 +++$+++ For the sake of openness, you might consider moving your current RfA to [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Dreamafter 3|Dreamafter 3]] and moving [[User:Dreamafter\/Old|2 (Original)]] just to 2.  +++$+++ :::For the sake of openness, you might consider moving your current RfA to [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dreamafter 3|Dreamafter 3]] and moving [[User:Dreamafter/Old|2 (Original)]] just to 2. [[User:GlassCobra|Glass]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|Cobra]]''' 23:41, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
542298 +++$+++ GlassCobra +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542292 +++$+++ 542297 +++$+++ 2008-01-06 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.199607360E09 +++$+++ It's been taken care of.  +++$+++ ::::It's been taken care of. [[User:GlassCobra|Glass]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|Cobra]]''' 00:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
542299 +++$+++ Captain panda +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542292 +++$+++ 542292 +++$+++ 2008-01-06 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.199614560E09 +++$+++ I have supported, but the RfA has already been transcluded. I guess that works just as well. :)  +++$+++ :I have supported, but the RfA has already been transcluded. I guess that works just as well. :) [[User:Captain panda|<font color="orange" face="comic sans ms">Captain</font>]] [[User talk:Captain panda|<font color="red" face="Papyrus">panda</font>]] 02:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

280149 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-22 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.214198220E09 +++$+++ Well, it is nearly four years later, but as a follow up to [[Wikipedia_talk:1911_Encyclopaedia_Britannica#1911_Encyclopaedia_Britannica_Use_Guidelines.3F|this]], I thought you might be interested in [[Wikipedia talk:Plagiarism|this]]. Some interesting EB 1911 stuff there.  +++$+++ Well, it is nearly four years later, but as a follow up to [[Wikipedia_talk:1911_Encyclopaedia_Britannica#1911_Encyclopaedia_Britannica_Use_Guidelines.3F|this]], I thought you might be interested in [[Wikipedia talk:Plagiarism|this]]. Some interesting EB 1911 stuff there. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 22:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
280150 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280149 +++$+++ 280149 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.214963400E09 +++$+++ Thanks Carcharoth, unfortunately my interests lie elsewhere just at the moment.  +++$+++ :Thanks Carcharoth, unfortunately my interests lie elsewhere just at the moment. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:50, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

280152 +++$+++ Privatemusings +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-02 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.214996280E09 +++$+++ cheers,  +++$+++ cheers, [[User:Privatemusings|Privatemusings]] ([[User talk:Privatemusings|talk]]) 03:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
280153 +++$+++ Privatemusings +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280152 +++$+++ 280152 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.215069600E09 +++$+++ Thanks alot for signing up as willing to answer a few questions, Paul - it's much appreciated. I mentioned to Kirill a short while ago that I don't see any urgency in rushing ''through'' this process, but getting the ball rolling will help enormously, I think. I'll drop a note in here in the next few days when the page has had a few more eyes and ears, and there's something of substance you'll be able to respond to. Thanks once again,  +++$+++ :Thanks alot for signing up as willing to answer a few questions, Paul - it's much appreciated. I mentioned to Kirill a short while ago that I don't see any urgency in rushing ''through'' this process, but getting the ball rolling will help enormously, I think. I'll drop a note in here in the next few days when the page has had a few more eyes and ears, and there's something of substance you'll be able to respond to. Thanks once again, [[User:Privatemusings|Privatemusings]] ([[User talk:Privatemusings|talk]]) 00:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

280154 +++$+++ Risker +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-08 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.215574080E09 +++$+++ Further to my posts at [[Wikipedia talk:Requests_for_arbitration\/Geogre-William_M._Connolley\/Workshop|this]] Arbitration Committee case and its associated [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Geogre-William_M._Connolley\/Workshop#The_detail_in_the_elephant|workshop]], I have emailed you evidence that includes private information. As I have noted at the workshop, I will leave it to you to share with fellow arbitrators active in the case.  Thanks.   +++$+++ Further to my posts at [[Wikipedia talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Geogre-William_M._Connolley/Workshop|this]] Arbitration Committee case and its associated [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Geogre-William_M._Connolley/Workshop#The_detail_in_the_elephant|workshop]], I have emailed you evidence that includes private information. As I have noted at the workshop, I will leave it to you to share with fellow arbitrators active in the case.  Thanks.  [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 20:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
280155 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280154 +++$+++ 280154 +++$+++ 2008-07-08 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.215584520E09 +++$+++ I've forwarded your email to the rest of the committee.  +++$+++ :I've forwarded your email to the rest of the committee. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:22, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
280156 +++$+++ Ncmvocalist +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280154 +++$+++ 280154 +++$+++ 2008-07-09 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.215651120E09 +++$+++ 2 arb-clarifications have been waiting on the discretionary sanctions wording. There are 4ish votes in support of the wording like in the homeopathy case, with 1 in oppose. It's nearly been 2 weeks since it was ready for voting. Can you please vote? I don't know why the rest of the Committee refuses to go near it, but if it's because they don't want discretionary sanctions enacted at all, why won't anyone just oppose and explain why it's not needed in their opinion?  +++$+++ * 2 arb-clarifications have been waiting on the discretionary sanctions wording. There are 4ish votes in support of the wording like in the homeopathy case, with 1 in oppose. It's nearly been 2 weeks since it was ready for voting. Can you please vote? I don't know why the rest of the Committee refuses to go near it, but if it's because they don't want discretionary sanctions enacted at all, why won't anyone just oppose and explain why it's not needed in their opinion? [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 17:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
280157 +++$+++ Ncmvocalist +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280154 +++$+++ 280154 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.215771000E09 +++$+++ I've asked a question [[User_talk:FloNight#Question|here]].  +++$+++ * I've asked a question [[User_talk:FloNight#Question|here]]. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 03:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
280158 +++$+++ Giano II +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280154 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 09:36:00 +++$+++ 1.216139760E09 +++$+++ Elephants are known for something else beside brute strength. The Arbitration committee would do well to rememeber that. I am getting very tired of their behaviour and Wikipedia in general, and while I'm sure their wish is to see the back of me, it would be nice, in their acheivement of their goal, to see some common decency and honour exhibited from them.  +++$+++ :::Elephants are known for something else beside brute strength. The Arbitration committee would do well to rememeber that. I am getting very tired of their behaviour and Wikipedia in general, and while I'm sure their wish is to see the back of me, it would be nice, in their acheivement of their goal, to see some common decency and honour exhibited from them. [[User:Giano II|Giano]] ([[User talk:Giano II|talk]]) 09:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

18013 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Fat pig73 +++$+++ 18013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-01 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.120270800E09 +++$+++ A GO Transit station should thus be filed ''only'' in [[:Category:GO Transit stations]]. That ''category'' is then filed as a subcategory of the next larger category (\"GO Transit\"), which is in turn filed under \"Transportation in Toronto\", \"Transportation in the Greater Toronto Area\" and \"Regional rail systems\". And then \"Transportation in Toronto\" and \"Transportation in the Greater Toronto Area\" are filed under \"Transportation in Ontario\". You do ''not'' file every individual article in each and every one of those categories.  +++$+++ A GO Transit station should thus be filed ''only'' in [[:Category:GO Transit stations]]. That ''category'' is then filed as a subcategory of the next larger category ("GO Transit"), which is in turn filed under "Transportation in Toronto", "Transportation in the Greater Toronto Area" and "Regional rail systems". And then "Transportation in Toronto" and "Transportation in the Greater Toronto Area" are filed under "Transportation in Ontario". You do ''not'' file every individual article in each and every one of those categories. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 1 July 2005 19:20 (UTC)
18014 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Fat pig73 +++$+++ 18013 +++$+++ 18013 +++$+++ 2005-07-02 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.120292100E09 +++$+++ Also, don't overload articles with excessive and inappropriate \"See also\" links (e.g. [[Rainbow and Magic Lantern Cinemas]]. It is ''not'' necessary to include see also and external links for every movie chain operating in Canada in every individual article. The ''only'' external links on the Rainbow Cinemas article should be to pages ''about Rainbow Cinemas'', and the category link itself is sufficient when it comes to linking to other chains. (And going back to GO Transit stations, for that matter, it's not necessary to add a \"See also [[GO Transit]]\" link if you've ''already'' linked to GO Transit in the article body.)  +++$+++ : Also, don't overload articles with excessive and inappropriate "See also" links (e.g. [[Rainbow and Magic Lantern Cinemas]]. It is ''not'' necessary to include see also and external links for every movie chain operating in Canada in every individual article. The ''only'' external links on the Rainbow Cinemas article should be to pages ''about Rainbow Cinemas'', and the category link itself is sufficient when it comes to linking to other chains. (And going back to GO Transit stations, for that matter, it's not necessary to add a "See also [[GO Transit]]" link if you've ''already'' linked to GO Transit in the article body.) [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 2 July 2005 01:15 (UTC)

280160 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280160 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-20 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.216605480E09 +++$+++ Please revert [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=The_Cantos&curid=1176422&diff=226848184&oldid=226846812 this], as the word \"much\" is extremely sloppy and very inaccurate. Furthermore, not having the subject in the beginning is very improper. Also, the word \"controversy\" has to repeat based on standard nominalization principles. This is basic English, and I can provide you many texts on the necessity of this repetition. Thanks.  +++$+++ Please revert [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Cantos&curid=1176422&diff=226848184&oldid=226846812 this], as the word "much" is extremely sloppy and very inaccurate. Furthermore, not having the subject in the beginning is very improper. Also, the word "controversy" has to repeat based on standard nominalization principles. This is basic English, and I can provide you many texts on the necessity of this repetition. Thanks. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 18:58, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
280161 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280160 +++$+++ 280160 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.216686360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

280164 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280164 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-21 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.216687740E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 17:49, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
280165 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280164 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.216691820E09 +++$+++ Done. :)  +++$+++ ::Done. :) [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 18:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

542309 +++$+++ F9T +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542309 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-10 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.200025380E09 +++$+++ What happens now? \/\/ [[User:F9T|<font color=\"Red\" face=\"Trebuchet MS\">F]]<font color=\"lightsteelblue\">[[User talk:F9T|<font color=\"blue\" face=\"Trebuchet MS\">9]] +++$+++ What happens now? // [[User:F9T|<font color="Red" face="Trebuchet MS">F]]<font color="lightsteelblue">[[User talk:F9T|<font color="blue" face="Trebuchet MS">9]][[User:F9T/WikiCup|<font color="green" face="Times">T]]</font></font></font> 20:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
542310 +++$+++ F9T +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542309 +++$+++ 542309 +++$+++ 2008-01-11 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.200072180E09 +++$+++ Okily Dokily \/\/ [[User:F9T|<font color=\"Red\" face=\"Trebuchet MS\">F]]<font color=\"lightsteelblue\">[[User talk:F9T|<font color=\"blue\" face=\"Trebuchet MS\">9]] +++$+++ :Okily Dokily // [[User:F9T|<font color="Red" face="Trebuchet MS">F]]<font color="lightsteelblue">[[User talk:F9T|<font color="blue" face="Trebuchet MS">9]][[User:F9T/WikiCup|<font color="green" face="Times">T]]</font></font></font> 09:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

280166 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280166 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-24 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.216892820E09 +++$+++ If you have a chance, could you look [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Personal_information here] and use oversight ability, unless someone beats you to it?  +++$+++ If you have a chance, could you look [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Personal_information here] and use oversight ability, unless someone beats you to it? [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 02:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
280167 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280166 +++$+++ 280166 +++$+++ 2008-07-24 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.216893180E09 +++$+++ It has already been taken care of.  +++$+++ :It has already been taken care of. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
280168 +++$+++ Ottava Rima +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280166 +++$+++ 280167 +++$+++ 2008-07-24 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.216893840E09 +++$+++ Well, thats good. :) By the way, did you have a chance to look at the Cantos's talk page?  +++$+++ ::Well, thats good. :) By the way, did you have a chance to look at the Cantos's talk page? [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 03:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

280169 +++$+++ SirFozzie +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-21 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.216692660E09 +++$+++ Hey Paul. I'd like to request that you show me how my comments are unhelpful please, either here, or privately. It's the bare facts of the matter. SlimVirgin is running a one man crusade to smear both Lar, and Alison publicly, where their hands are tied due to checkuser privacy policy. Even regarding this, the consensus is markedly against SlimVirgin, which is why she continues to try to find new places to try to forum-shop her smears (Got told that ANI was not the place and if she had a problem with Lar's actions, to file a complaint with the Ombudsmen, or with ArbCom. Instead, she brought it to EN-L and continued to make these smears). She has a habit of doing so (when the first ArbCom got opened, she attempted an end-run around English Wikipedia and it's proceedures by trying to rally support for a BADSITES-like proposal on the FOUNDATION-L list). Even if my comments are \"unhelpful\" they are completely accurate.  +++$+++ Hey Paul. I'd like to request that you show me how my comments are unhelpful please, either here, or privately. It's the bare facts of the matter. SlimVirgin is running a one man crusade to smear both Lar, and Alison publicly, where their hands are tied due to checkuser privacy policy. Even regarding this, the consensus is markedly against SlimVirgin, which is why she continues to try to find new places to try to forum-shop her smears (Got told that ANI was not the place and if she had a problem with Lar's actions, to file a complaint with the Ombudsmen, or with ArbCom. Instead, she brought it to EN-L and continued to make these smears). She has a habit of doing so (when the first ArbCom got opened, she attempted an end-run around English Wikipedia and it's proceedures by trying to rally support for a BADSITES-like proposal on the FOUNDATION-L list). Even if my comments are "unhelpful" they are completely accurate. [[User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]] ([[User talk:SirFozzie|talk]]) 19:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
280170 +++$+++ SirFozzie +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280169 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.216693620E09 +++$+++ At the request of another, I have restated my feelings, but I completely stand behind what I said.  +++$+++ ::At the request of another, I have restated my feelings, but I completely stand behind what I said. [[User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]] ([[User talk:SirFozzie|talk]]) 19:27, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
280171 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280169 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.216694760E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ :::Thank you. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

542315 +++$+++ F9T +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-14 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.200360660E09 +++$+++ Can you help me sort out why this won't work on my user, I have been somewhere for a few hours now. \/\/ [[User:F9T|<font color=\"Red\" face=\"Trebuchet MS\">F]]<font color=\"lightsteelblue\">[[User talk:F9T|<font color=\"blue\" face=\"Trebuchet MS\">9]] +++$+++ Can you help me sort out why this won't work on my user, I have been somewhere for a few hours now. // [[User:F9T|<font color="Red" face="Trebuchet MS">F]]<font color="lightsteelblue">[[User talk:F9T|<font color="blue" face="Trebuchet MS">9]][[User:F9T/WikiCup|<font color="green" face="Times">T]]</font></font></font> 17:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
542316 +++$+++ F9T +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542315 +++$+++ 542315 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.200361140E09 +++$+++ OK thanks for both replys, for the WikiCup, you need to add your name on the team list at the bottom of the WikiCup page \/\/ [[User:F9T|<font color=\"Red\" face=\"Trebuchet MS\">F]]<font color=\"lightsteelblue\">[[User talk:F9T|<font color=\"blue\" face=\"Trebuchet MS\">9]] +++$+++ :OK thanks for both replys, for the WikiCup, you need to add your name on the team list at the bottom of the WikiCup page // [[User:F9T|<font color="Red" face="Trebuchet MS">F]]<font color="lightsteelblue">[[User talk:F9T|<font color="blue" face="Trebuchet MS">9]][[User:F9T/WikiCup|<font color="green" face="Times">T]]</font></font></font> 17:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

280172 +++$+++ Qp10qp +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280172 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-26 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.217107380E09 +++$+++ Paul, sorry to bother you. [[user:Slp1|Slp1]] and I have put [[Learned Hand]] up for peer review, prior to a submission for FAC. I know you were one of the editors who agreed with the idea of bringing this article to FA as a tribute to [[user:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]], and so I hope you'll be pleased we've come this far. We'd appreciate a peer review from you if you can find the time, to help us iron out any flaws before we go to FAC. All the best.  +++$+++ Paul, sorry to bother you. [[user:Slp1|Slp1]] and I have put [[Learned Hand]] up for peer review, prior to a submission for FAC. I know you were one of the editors who agreed with the idea of bringing this article to FA as a tribute to [[user:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]], and so I hope you'll be pleased we've come this far. We'd appreciate a peer review from you if you can find the time, to help us iron out any flaws before we go to FAC. All the best. [[User:Qp10qp|qp10qp]] ([[User talk:Qp10qp|talk]]) 14:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
280173 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280172 +++$+++ 280172 +++$+++ 2008-07-27 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.217142120E09 +++$+++ Don't know that I will be able to be of any help, but I'm very pleased at what you've done. Good work.  +++$+++ :Don't know that I will be able to be of any help, but I'm very pleased at what you've done. Good work. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:02, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

542317 +++$+++ Aatomic1 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542317 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-14 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.200374460E09 +++$+++ [[User:Dreamafter\/Mediation\/Answer\/Summaries\/Final\/Discussion]] has been blanked. Is it possible to retrieve this information?  +++$+++ [[User:Dreamafter/Mediation/Answer/Summaries/Final/Discussion]] has been blanked. Is it possible to retrieve this information? [[User:Aatomic1|Aatomic1]] ([[User talk:Aatomic1|talk]]) 21:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
542318 +++$+++ SirFozzie +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542317 +++$+++ 542317 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.200459060E09 +++$+++ This is in regard to [[Birmingham pub bombings]]. Both sides are citing your mediation closure (both the old one and the new one) as reasons to continue edit-warring to either take the list out or to put it back in.  +++$+++ :This is in regard to [[Birmingham pub bombings]]. Both sides are citing your mediation closure (both the old one and the new one) as reasons to continue edit-warring to either take the list out or to put it back in. [[User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]] ([[User talk:SirFozzie|talk]]) 20:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
542319 +++$+++ Padraig +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542317 +++$+++ 542318 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.200460320E09 +++$+++ This is because Aatomic dosen't like that fact that the mediation was reopened, as many weren't aware of it and others where too busy being involved with the ''Troubles'' arbcom at the time.  When it was reopened Aatomic couldn't provide a reason too justify the lists of the dead and continued edit warring over a number of articles, this resulted in the mediation being closed as he was ignoring it and seem intent on continuing no-matter what the outcome was. He was later put one revert probation as per the ''Troubles'' arbcom, and recently started edit warring again on this issue which earned him another probation period.-- +++$+++ ::This is because Aatomic dosen't like that fact that the mediation was reopened, as many weren't aware of it and others where too busy being involved with the ''Troubles'' arbcom at the time.  When it was reopened Aatomic couldn't provide a reason too justify the lists of the dead and continued edit warring over a number of articles, this resulted in the mediation being closed as he was ignoring it and seem intent on continuing no-matter what the outcome was. He was later put one revert probation as per the ''Troubles'' arbcom, and recently started edit warring again on this issue which earned him another probation period.--[[User:Padraig|Padraig]] ([[User talk:Padraig|talk]]) 21:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

280175 +++$+++ 203.194.98.177 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-29 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.217392500E09 +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions\/203.194.98.177|203.194.98.177]] ( +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions/203.194.98.177|203.194.98.177]] ([[User talk:203.194.98.177|talk]]) 21:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
280176 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ 2008-07-29 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.217397720E09 +++$+++ I've sent a message to arb mailing list containing a link to this post.  +++$+++ :I've sent a message to arb mailing list containing a link to this post. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
280177 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-30 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.217408700E09 +++$+++ Well I will send the text if you like, but since your message included links I thought it best to simply link to your post.  +++$+++ :::Well I will send the text if you like, but since your message included links I thought it best to simply link to your post. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
280178 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.217498760E09 +++$+++ Well I don't know what you mean by \"Ncmvocalist has apparently been invited to clerk the RFAr\"; what RFAr are you talking about? In any case Ncmvocalist is not a clerk &mdash; the process of becoming a clerk is described at [[WP:CLERK]]. I expect that Kirill's post is related to the fact that Ncmvocalist has been acting the gadfly, buzzing around pestering various arbs to do their jobs (e.g. see this very page), a role eminently suitable for a clerk.  +++$+++ :::::Well I don't know what you mean by "Ncmvocalist has apparently been invited to clerk the RFAr"; what RFAr are you talking about? In any case Ncmvocalist is not a clerk &mdash; the process of becoming a clerk is described at [[WP:CLERK]]. I expect that Kirill's post is related to the fact that Ncmvocalist has been acting the gadfly, buzzing around pestering various arbs to do their jobs (e.g. see this very page), a role eminently suitable for a clerk. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
280179 +++$+++ Geogre +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.217533500E09 +++$+++ Goads are alright, if they're delivered by a drover.  Is this creature a parasite or a guide?  Given his highly emotional display and his lack of dispassion, merely telling arbs to do something may not be enough to indicate judgment.   +++$+++ ::::Goads are alright, if they're delivered by a drover.  Is this creature a parasite or a guide?  Given his highly emotional display and his lack of dispassion, merely telling arbs to do something may not be enough to indicate judgment.  [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] ([[User talk:Geogre|talk]]) 12:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
280180 +++$+++ Lar +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.217541540E09 +++$+++ I sincerely hope that Ncmvocalist is not allowed to clerk anything related to ArbCom. I do not think his approach is suited to the task, and some of the things done already by Ncmvocalist have been, in my view, rather counter productive... (in particular \"pestering\" arbs is not what is needed...)  If there is a better place to give this input please advise and I will do so. ++ +++$+++ :I sincerely hope that Ncmvocalist is not allowed to clerk anything related to ArbCom. I do not think his approach is suited to the task, and some of the things done already by Ncmvocalist have been, in my view, rather counter productive... (in particular "pestering" arbs is not what is needed...)  If there is a better place to give this input please advise and I will do so. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 14:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
280181 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ 280180 +++$+++ 2008-07-31 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.217547420E09 +++$+++ Well unfortunately, we all need ''something'' (pestering? goading? bugging? prodding?)) now and then. Of course there are good ways of pestering and bad, Newyorkbrad's methods were the acme of the polite but persistent nudge. As for proper venues, this is probably not the best.  +++$+++ ::Well unfortunately, we all need ''something'' (pestering? goading? bugging? prodding?)) now and then. Of course there are good ways of pestering and bad, Newyorkbrad's methods were the acme of the polite but persistent nudge. As for proper venues, this is probably not the best. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
280182 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ 2008-08-08 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.218227820E09 +++$+++ I've commented there.  +++$+++ :I've commented there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
280183 +++$+++ Tex +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ 280182 +++$+++ 2008-08-08 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.218232860E09 +++$+++ And a very nice comment it was.  I laughed out loud.  Thank you.  +++$+++ ::And a very nice comment it was.  I laughed out loud.  Thank you. [[User:Tex|Tex]] ([[User talk:Tex|talk]]) 15:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
280184 +++$+++ giggy +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280175 +++$+++ 280183 +++$+++ 2008-08-09 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.218287100E09 +++$+++ What a great comment. \u2014''' +++$+++ :::What a great comment. —'''[[user talk:giggy|Giggy]]''' 06:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

542320 +++$+++ Compwhizii +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-14 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.200374700E09 +++$+++ Its not approved yet. I'm putting a request in now. <font style=\"color:Blue;\">'' ''' +++$+++ Its not approved yet. I'm putting a request in now. <font style="color:Blue;">'' '''[[User:Compwhizii|Compwhiz II]]'''<sup>([[User_Talk:Compwhizii|Talk]])</sup><sub>([[Special:Contributions/Compwhizii|Contribs]])</sub> ''</font> 21:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
542321 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542320 +++$+++ 542320 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.200385020E09 +++$+++ Doesn't look like it's active right now.  If it starts up, let me know.  +++$+++ :Doesn't look like it's active right now.  If it starts up, let me know. [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 00:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

439912 +++$+++ ErikTheBikeMan +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ 439912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-22 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.237777620E09 +++$+++ I have left a note on the talk page of the project about my proposal for a new assessment template in order to determine consensus before moving [[User:ErikTheBikeMan\/Template|my version]] of the template to the the transclused page. However, no one has replied, either positively or negatively. Since you know more about the project than me, I would like to ask you to let some of the more active members of [[WP:Norse]] know about the proposal. If no one objects within the next few weeks, I will [[WP:BOLD|be bold]] and simply make the change myself and create the appropriate categories. Thanks,  +++$+++ I have left a note on the talk page of the project about my proposal for a new assessment template in order to determine consensus before moving [[User:ErikTheBikeMan/Template|my version]] of the template to the the transclused page. However, no one has replied, either positively or negatively. Since you know more about the project than me, I would like to ask you to let some of the more active members of [[WP:Norse]] know about the proposal. If no one objects within the next few weeks, I will [[WP:BOLD|be bold]] and simply make the change myself and create the appropriate categories. Thanks, [[User:ErikTheBikeMan|ErikTheBikeMan]] ([[User talk:ErikTheBikeMan|talk]]) 20:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
439913 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ 439912 +++$+++ 439912 +++$+++ 2009-03-22 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.237779000E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure that I understand what the advantages would be.-- +++$+++ :I'm not sure that I understand what the advantages would be.--[[User:Berig|Berig]] ([[User talk:Berig#top|talk]]) 20:30, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
439914 +++$+++ ErikTheBikeMan +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ 439912 +++$+++ 439913 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.237797180E09 +++$+++ Being able to focus on article classes by category. For example, we currently have Top-importance stubs, though if someone were to begin expanding our stubs, they would be unlikely to find those stubs for a long time. On the other hand, with the new template, finding the articles that most urgently need work would be much easier.  +++$+++ ::Being able to focus on article classes by category. For example, we currently have Top-importance stubs, though if someone were to begin expanding our stubs, they would be unlikely to find those stubs for a long time. On the other hand, with the new template, finding the articles that most urgently need work would be much easier. [[User:ErikTheBikeMan|ErikTheBikeMan]] ([[User talk:ErikTheBikeMan|talk]]) 01:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
439915 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ 439912 +++$+++ 439914 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.237822980E09 +++$+++ I doubt that editors improve articles based on their category in WP:Norse. Usually, editors only improve articles because they care about the subject.-- +++$+++ :::I doubt that editors improve articles based on their category in WP:Norse. Usually, editors only improve articles because they care about the subject.--[[User:Berig|Berig]] ([[User talk:Berig#top|talk]]) 08:43, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
439916 +++$+++ ErikTheBikeMan +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ 439912 +++$+++ 439915 +++$+++ 2009-03-24 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.237952580E09 +++$+++ True, but an editor looking to improve articles across the project may be interested.  +++$+++ ::::True, but an editor looking to improve articles across the project may be interested. [[User:ErikTheBikeMan|ErikTheBikeMan]] ([[User talk:ErikTheBikeMan|talk]]) 20:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
439917 +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ 439912 +++$+++ 439916 +++$+++ 2009-03-24 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.237954560E09 +++$+++ Well, now you know why I'm not enthusiastic about it. However, if it does not demand any voluntary work from the members of WP:Norse, but only a bot, I don't think anyone would mind if you went ahead.-- +++$+++ :::::Well, now you know why I'm not enthusiastic about it. However, if it does not demand any voluntary work from the members of WP:Norse, but only a bot, I don't think anyone would mind if you went ahead.--[[User:Berig|Berig]] ([[User talk:Berig#top|talk]]) 21:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
439918 +++$+++ Holt +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ 439912 +++$+++ 439917 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.238015220E09 +++$+++ I'll just jump in and say that I would deem such a solution Erik is suggesting as very useful. I would rather expand a stub that I know is important and people read often, than a stub that is visited once a week! \u2013 +++$+++ ::::::I'll just jump in and say that I would deem such a solution Erik is suggesting as very useful. I would rather expand a stub that I know is important and people read often, than a stub that is visited once a week! –[[User:Holt|Holt]] <small>([[User talk:Holt|T]]•[[Special:Contributions/Holt|C]])</small> 14:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
439919 +++$+++ ErikTheBikeMan +++$+++ Berig +++$+++ 439912 +++$+++ 439918 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.238039760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the support. Also, now that I think about it, this wouldn't even require a bot. I will go change the template soon.  +++$+++ :::::::Thanks for the support. Also, now that I think about it, this wouldn't even require a bot. I will go change the template soon. [[User:ErikTheBikeMan|ErikTheBikeMan]] ([[User talk:ErikTheBikeMan|talk]]) 20:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

542327 +++$+++ Ohmpandya +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542327 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-18 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.200719220E09 +++$+++ I made 30 edits to [[Heuschrecke 10]]. I did not list them on the link you provided, because it would take overwhelmingly long. Please, see my work.  +++$+++ I made 30 edits to [[Heuschrecke 10]]. I did not list them on the link you provided, because it would take overwhelmingly long. Please, see my work. [[User: Ohmpandya|'''''<font face="Chiller" size="4px" color="#000066">- Ohmpandya</font>''''']] <sup>''<font face="Calibri" color="#660000">[[User talk:Ohmpandya|We need to talk...]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Ohmpandya|contribs]]''</font></sup> 21:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
542328 +++$+++ Ohmpandya +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542327 +++$+++ 542327 +++$+++ 2008-01-18 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.200727620E09 +++$+++ Wow! Thanks for the barnstars! I'm going to see what else I can add.  +++$+++ :Wow! Thanks for the barnstars! I'm going to see what else I can add. [[User: Ohmpandya|'''''<font face="Chiller" size="4px" color="#000066">- Ohmpandya</font>''''']] <sup>''<font face="Calibri" color="#660000">[[User talk:Ohmpandya|We need to talk...]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Ohmpandya|contribs]]''</font></sup> 23:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
542329 +++$+++ Ohmpandya +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542327 +++$+++ 542328 +++$+++ 2008-01-19 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.200731280E09 +++$+++ I made a little over 40 ''more'' edits on the article. So total I made a little over 70 edits on the article.  +++$+++ ::I made a little over 40 ''more'' edits on the article. So total I made a little over 70 edits on the article. [[User: Ohmpandya|'''''<font face="Chiller" size="4px" color="#000066">- Ohmpandya</font>''''']] <sup>''<font face="Calibri" color="#660000">[[User talk:Ohmpandya|We need to talk...]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Ohmpandya|contribs]]''</font></sup> 00:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
542330 +++$+++ Ohmpandya +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542327 +++$+++ 542329 +++$+++ 2008-01-19 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.200734340E09 +++$+++ 7 more edits! I believe I passes the 80 mark now :)  +++$+++ :::7 more edits! I believe I passes the 80 mark now :) [[User: Ohmpandya|'''''<font face="Chiller" size="4px" color="#000066">- Ohmpandya</font>''''']] <sup>''<font face="Calibri" color="#660000">[[User talk:Ohmpandya|We need to talk...]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Ohmpandya|contribs]]''</font></sup> 01:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

280186 +++$+++ Rjd0060 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-08 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.218234240E09 +++$+++ (Edit conflict with above) It doesn't matter if you are an arbitrator or not - [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=230608719&oldid=230607933 this] comment was completely unacceptable, and contained a personal attack.  You should definitely know better.  -  +++$+++ (Edit conflict with above) It doesn't matter if you are an arbitrator or not - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=230608719&oldid=230607933 this] comment was completely unacceptable, and contained a personal attack.  You should definitely know better.  - [[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] ([[User talk:Rjd0060|talk]]) 15:24, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
280187 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280186 +++$+++ 280186 +++$+++ 2008-08-08 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.218237840E09 +++$+++ I've offered my apologies to Chillium there.  +++$+++ :I've offered my apologies to Chillium there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:24, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

542331 +++$+++ Ohmpandya +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-19 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.200739500E09 +++$+++ Is there any other article that I can help with?  +++$+++ Is there any other article that I can help with? [[User: Ohmpandya|'''''<font face="Chiller" size="4px" color="#000066">- Ohmpandya</font>''''']] <sup>''<font face="Calibri" color="#660000">[[User talk:Ohmpandya|We need to talk...]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Ohmpandya|contribs]]''</font></sup> 02:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
542332 +++$+++ Ohmpandya +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542331 +++$+++ 542331 +++$+++ 2008-01-19 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.200741000E09 +++$+++ That seems tough. Little comes up from google. How about if I help you out with [[Anzio War Cemetery]]?  +++$+++ :That seems tough. Little comes up from google. How about if I help you out with [[Anzio War Cemetery]]? [[User: Ohmpandya|'''''<font face="Chiller" size="4px" color="#000066">- Ohmpandya</font>''''']] <sup>''<font face="Calibri" color="#660000">[[User talk:Ohmpandya|We need to talk...]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Ohmpandya|contribs]]''</font></sup> 03:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
542333 +++$+++ Ohmpandya +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542331 +++$+++ 542331 +++$+++ 2008-01-19 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.200791160E09 +++$+++ Ok I made a little over 30 edits on [[Anzio War Cemetery]]. This is the most I could add.  +++$+++ :Ok I made a little over 30 edits on [[Anzio War Cemetery]]. This is the most I could add. [[User: Ohmpandya|'''''<font face="Chiller" size="4px" color="#000066">- Ohmpandya</font>''''']] <sup>''<font face="Calibri" color="#660000">[[User talk:Ohmpandya|We need to talk...]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Ohmpandya|contribs]]''</font></sup> 17:06, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

280188 +++$+++ Bstone +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280188 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-08 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.218237600E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors{{#if:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Arbitration enforcement|, as you did on [[:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Arbitration enforcement]]}}. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa1 -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors{{#if:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement|, as you did on [[:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement]]}}. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa1 --> [[User:Bstone|Bstone]] ([[User talk:Bstone|talk]]) 16:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
280189 +++$+++ Friday +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280188 +++$+++ 280188 +++$+++ 2008-08-08 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.218238020E09 +++$+++ Is it entirely necessary to give a longtime contributor a templated message that begins with \"Welcome to Wikipedia\"?  Other people left more sensible messages about the same issue already.  We need more personal communication and less mindless button-pushing.   +++$+++ :Is it entirely necessary to give a longtime contributor a templated message that begins with "Welcome to Wikipedia"?  Other people left more sensible messages about the same issue already.  We need more personal communication and less mindless button-pushing.  [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 16:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
280190 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280188 +++$+++ 280188 +++$+++ 2008-08-08 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.218239760E09 +++$+++ Hi Bstone, assuming you think I'm new to Wikipedia, thanks for the welcome. But I'm afraid it's a bit late, as I arrived in July of 2004 ;-) You don't say, but I assume you are referring to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=230608719&oldid=230607933 this edit]. My comment was not intended as (and I don't think it was) a personal attack. In any case I've offered my apologies to Chillium [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=230637453&oldid=230636919 there].  +++$+++ :Hi Bstone, assuming you think I'm new to Wikipedia, thanks for the welcome. But I'm afraid it's a bit late, as I arrived in July of 2004 ;-) You don't say, but I assume you are referring to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=230608719&oldid=230607933 this edit]. My comment was not intended as (and I don't think it was) a personal attack. In any case I've offered my apologies to Chillium [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=230637453&oldid=230636919 there]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
280191 +++$+++ C S +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280188 +++$+++ 280188 +++$+++ 2008-08-08 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.218240480E09 +++$+++ Oh the irony!  Bstone's talk page prominently displays the following: {{warning|If your message is rude, templated, and\/or begins with \"Welcome to Wikipedia!\", it will be reverted upon me seeing it. '''Note:''' Thank you notes are not included in this warning.}} :-- +++$+++ :Oh the irony!  Bstone's talk page prominently displays the following: {{warning|If your message is rude, templated, and/or begins with "Welcome to Wikipedia!", it will be reverted upon me seeing it. '''Note:''' Thank you notes are not included in this warning.}} :--[[User:C S|C S]] ([[User talk:C S|talk]]) 17:08, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

280192 +++$+++  +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Does the edit I made help? {{Usercheck-full|Mr. Opensockpuppeter}} 18:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ Does the edit I made help? {{Usercheck-full|Mr. Opensockpuppeter}} 18:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
280193 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280192 +++$+++ 280192 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.222312140E09 +++$+++ Help what? I've restored the original comment; I would prefer that you not change other folks posts, thanks.  +++$+++ :Help what? I've restored the original comment; I would prefer that you not change other folks posts, thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

18051 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Fat pig73 +++$+++ 18051 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-22 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.151045040E09 +++$+++ Why are you moving articles from [[:Category:History of immigration to the United States]] and [[:Category:United States immigration law]] into [[:Category:United States law]]? - +++$+++ Why are you moving articles from [[:Category:History of immigration to the United States]] and [[:Category:United States immigration law]] into [[:Category:United States law]]? -[[User:Will Beback|Will Beback]] 23:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
18052 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Fat pig73 +++$+++ 18051 +++$+++ 18051 +++$+++ 2006-06-24 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.151151540E09 +++$+++ Hello? - +++$+++ :Hello? -[[User:Will Beback|Will Beback]] 05:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

542340 +++$+++ Ohmpandya +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542340 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-21 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.200969000E09 +++$+++ I'm going to make some more edits to [[Heuschrecke 10]].  +++$+++ I'm going to make some more edits to [[Heuschrecke 10]]. [[User: Ohmpandya|'''''<font face="Chiller" size="4px" color="#000066">- Ohmpandya</font>''''']] <sup>''<font face="Calibri" color="#660000">[[User talk:Ohmpandya|We need to talk...]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Ohmpandya|contribs]]''</font></sup> 18:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
542341 +++$+++ Ohmpandya +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542340 +++$+++ 542340 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.200969720E09 +++$+++ I have made 100 total edits now on [[Heuschrecke 10]]. I consider you nominate it for good article status?  +++$+++ :I have made 100 total edits now on [[Heuschrecke 10]]. I consider you nominate it for good article status? [[User: Ohmpandya|'''''<font face="Chiller" size="4px" color="#000066">- Ohmpandya</font>''''']] <sup>''<font face="Calibri" color="#660000">[[User talk:Ohmpandya|We need to talk...]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Ohmpandya|contribs]]''</font></sup> 18:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
542342 +++$+++ Ohmpandya +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542340 +++$+++ 542341 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.200982380E09 +++$+++ Well the article looks great! Is there no barnstar for 100 edits?  +++$+++ ::Well the article looks great! Is there no barnstar for 100 edits? [[User: Ohmpandya|'''''<font face="Chiller" size="4px" color="#000066">- Ohmpandya</font>''''']] <sup>''<font face="Calibri" color="#660000">[[User talk:Ohmpandya|We need to talk...]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/Ohmpandya|contribs]]''</font></sup> 22:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

542347 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-27 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.201434060E09 +++$+++ No major objection to your post (we're all entitled to our own opinions), but for clarification, I explicitly stated that I want to be involved in [[WP:AN]] (where admin rights are needed to close out backlogs), and not FAC (where admin rights are not needed). Additionally, where is the time requirement between nominations? Had I known there was a time policy I certainly wouldn't have bothered...or am I completely misreading this and this is your personal opinion? If so, what is your logic on time between applications? Again, strictly questions about your comments for my personal edification, not questioning your opinion. <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ No major objection to your post (we're all entitled to our own opinions), but for clarification, I explicitly stated that I want to be involved in [[WP:AN]] (where admin rights are needed to close out backlogs), and not FAC (where admin rights are not needed). Additionally, where is the time requirement between nominations? Had I known there was a time policy I certainly wouldn't have bothered...or am I completely misreading this and this is your personal opinion? If so, what is your logic on time between applications? Again, strictly questions about your comments for my personal edification, not questioning your opinion. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 03:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
542348 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542347 +++$+++ 542347 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.201500540E09 +++$+++ On a lighter.more personal note, where do you serve, sir? <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ :On a lighter.more personal note, where do you serve, sir? <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 22:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
542349 +++$+++ BQZip01 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542347 +++$+++ 542348 +++$+++ 2008-01-29 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.201609380E09 +++$+++ When you stated that I didn't have a lot of admin-related tasks, I beg to differ. I have been involved in both [[WP:SSP]] and others especially in the past few weeks. Just an FYI. <span style=\"background-color: maroon; color: white\"> +++$+++ ::When you stated that I didn't have a lot of admin-related tasks, I beg to differ. I have been involved in both [[WP:SSP]] and others especially in the past few weeks. Just an FYI. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">[[User:BQZip01|<font color="white">'''—&nbsp;''BQZip01''&nbsp;—'''</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:BQZip01|talk]]</sup> 04:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

280206 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-22 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.219402080E09 +++$+++ Sad to see this, though I certainly can't blame you for not wanting to do it anymore. Have a great time in the mainspace. May we all read what you wrote above. We need to take it to heart.  +++$+++ Sad to see this, though I certainly can't blame you for not wanting to do it anymore. Have a great time in the mainspace. May we all read what you wrote above. We need to take it to heart. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 03:48, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
280207 +++$+++ Geogre +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280206 +++$+++ 280206 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.219427040E09 +++$+++ When the person who got the most unanimous support of all the candidates has resigned, and when persons little supported remain and increase involvement, the instrument is sick.  I concur with your warnings, Paul, and I rather think that self-selected power is the [[http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/The_Chance_for_Peace cross of iron]] of Wikipedia.  As those who believe in ''themselves'' rather than the group push forward to take power (\"did you know that no one is in charge? cool!\"), there is more than a nuisance involved.  The ultimate price to be paid will be to make statutory the bleeding out that we've seen accidentally over the years.  People will join for the opportunity, stay for the validity of the promise, and then leave.  This is the end, and it will be an end brought about as testimony to what T. S. Eliot said, \"The majority of mankind is lazy-minded, incurious, absorbed in vanities, and tepid in emotion.\"   +++$+++ :When the person who got the most unanimous support of all the candidates has resigned, and when persons little supported remain and increase involvement, the instrument is sick.  I concur with your warnings, Paul, and I rather think that self-selected power is the [[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Chance_for_Peace cross of iron]] of Wikipedia.  As those who believe in ''themselves'' rather than the group push forward to take power ("did you know that no one is in charge? cool!"), there is more than a nuisance involved.  The ultimate price to be paid will be to make statutory the bleeding out that we've seen accidentally over the years.  People will join for the opportunity, stay for the validity of the promise, and then leave.  This is the end, and it will be an end brought about as testimony to what T. S. Eliot said, "The majority of mankind is lazy-minded, incurious, absorbed in vanities, and tepid in emotion."  [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] ([[User talk:Geogre|talk]]) 10:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

542351 +++$+++ Barneca +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-29 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.201610880E09 +++$+++ Seriously, though, thanks for the kind words in December. -- +++$+++ Seriously, though, thanks for the kind words in December. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca|talk]]) 04:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
542352 +++$+++ Barneca +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542351 +++$+++ 542351 +++$+++ 2008-01-29 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.201647900E09 +++$+++ Saw your comment on MastCell's talk page.  You might be waiting a while on that page going active; I'm hoping\/planning on never needing [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Barneca 3|Barneca 3]].  I'm hoping [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Barneca 2|Barneca 2]] is all we'll need. :) -- +++$+++ :Saw your comment on MastCell's talk page.  You might be waiting a while on that page going active; I'm hoping/planning on never needing [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Barneca 3|Barneca 3]].  I'm hoping [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Barneca 2|Barneca 2]] is all we'll need. :) --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca|talk]]) 15:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

18065 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Fat pig73 +++$+++ 18065 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.165922040E09 +++$+++ Would you '''please''' pay attention when people tell you how to apply categorization on Wikipedia?  +++$+++ Would you '''please''' pay attention when people tell you how to apply categorization on Wikipedia? [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 03:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
18066 +++$+++ Skeezix1000 +++$+++ Fat pig73 +++$+++ 18065 +++$+++ 18065 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.165973160E09 +++$+++ It's not a great idea to delete warnings and requests from your talk page.  The better approach would be to actually respond.   +++$+++ *It's not a great idea to delete warnings and requests from your talk page.  The better approach would be to actually respond.  [[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] 17:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

280210 +++$+++ Jd2718 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-22 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.219435800E09 +++$+++ I think I cast the first vote for you back in 2006. Sorry to see you go, but I trust your judgment, and decision. Best wishes.  +++$+++ I think I cast the first vote for you back in 2006. Sorry to see you go, but I trust your judgment, and decision. Best wishes. [[User:Jd2718|Jd2718]] ([[User talk:Jd2718|talk]]) 13:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
280211 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280210 +++$+++ 280210 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.219450920E09 +++$+++ Thanks everyone ''very much'' for all the kind words.  +++$+++ * Thanks everyone ''very much'' for all the kind words. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

527299 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527299 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-06 09:26:00 +++$+++ 1.249575960E09 +++$+++ If you haven't noticed the discussion at [[Talk:List of notable United States Marines#Remove edit warning]], then please take a look; we are considering using [[template:editnotice]], but it requires an admin to use it in article space. Tony and I have been conversing back and forth a bit on our talk pages as well, but here's the gist: we both agree it might be good for a trial run, but he's not confident in his tech skills to make it work right the first try. I'm uncomfortable with doing trying it through a proxy, since that necessitates periods of time (possibly lengthy ones) where a flawed template is viewable by the public, and I can't really think of how to do a trial or sandbox with something like that. I figured you had a good enough grasp of coding and formatting that you could handle it, if you are interested in getting onvolved. ''' +++$+++ If you haven't noticed the discussion at [[Talk:List of notable United States Marines#Remove edit warning]], then please take a look; we are considering using [[template:editnotice]], but it requires an admin to use it in article space. Tony and I have been conversing back and forth a bit on our talk pages as well, but here's the gist: we both agree it might be good for a trial run, but he's not confident in his tech skills to make it work right the first try. I'm uncomfortable with doing trying it through a proxy, since that necessitates periods of time (possibly lengthy ones) where a flawed template is viewable by the public, and I can't really think of how to do a trial or sandbox with something like that. I figured you had a good enough grasp of coding and formatting that you could handle it, if you are interested in getting onvolved. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000">bahamut0013</span>]]'''<span style="background:#D2B48C"><small>[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<sup style="color:#000;margin-left:3px">words</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<sub style="color:#000;margin-left:-20px">deeds</sub>]]</small></span> 09:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
527300 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527299 +++$+++ 527299 +++$+++ 2009-08-09 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.249837980E09 +++$+++ I figure that the text that's already in the lead paragraph would do fine. As far as implementation goes, I think [[WP:edit notice]] covers it all. However, if you don't have the time to fiddle with it, I think that defeats the purpose of getting you involved, because surely we will have to tweak it a few times. ''' +++$+++ :I figure that the text that's already in the lead paragraph would do fine. As far as implementation goes, I think [[WP:edit notice]] covers it all. However, if you don't have the time to fiddle with it, I think that defeats the purpose of getting you involved, because surely we will have to tweak it a few times. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000">bahamut0013</span>]]'''<span style="background:#D2B48C"><small>[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<sup style="color:#000;margin-left:3px">words</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<sub style="color:#000;margin-left:-20px">deeds</sub>]]</small></span> 10:13, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
527301 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527299 +++$+++ 527300 +++$+++ 2009-08-09 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.249858920E09 +++$+++ I think we have to have the entire warning there in the template. Directing a casual editor to read a warning on another page will probably get disregarded, but having the warning there is more likely to work. You should add your tweaks, then get Tony to read it, and if he doesn't have any modifications of his own, we can post a preview on the talk page to see if anyone else has a comment. Then, we can agree on a time to implement where we would both be available to make any quick mods if the thing doesn't work\/look right. ''' +++$+++ ::I think we have to have the entire warning there in the template. Directing a casual editor to read a warning on another page will probably get disregarded, but having the warning there is more likely to work. You should add your tweaks, then get Tony to read it, and if he doesn't have any modifications of his own, we can post a preview on the talk page to see if anyone else has a comment. Then, we can agree on a time to implement where we would both be available to make any quick mods if the thing doesn't work/look right. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000">bahamut0013</span>]]'''<span style="background:#D2B48C"><small>[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<sup style="color:#000;margin-left:3px">words</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<sub style="color:#000;margin-left:-20px">deeds</sub>]]</small></span> 16:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
527302 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527299 +++$+++ 527300 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.249915320E09 +++$+++ I looked at \"editnotice\" in your [[User:ERcheck\/Sandbox5|Sandbox]] and it looks real fine to me. By the way ER, I wrote an article about the last uprising in Puerto Rico against Spanish colonial in 1897 one year before the Spanish-American War. The cool thing about the article is that this event, where the Puerto Rican flag was unfurled in Puerto Rican soil for the first time, has been omitted from the history books and almost no one knows about it. You can't even find it in the internet and my descentdents on my mothers side, the Mattei's, where protagonists. Check it out when you time: [[Intentona de Yauco]].  +++$+++ **I looked at "editnotice" in your [[User:ERcheck/Sandbox5|Sandbox]] and it looks real fine to me. By the way ER, I wrote an article about the last uprising in Puerto Rico against Spanish colonial in 1897 one year before the Spanish-American War. The cool thing about the article is that this event, where the Puerto Rican flag was unfurled in Puerto Rican soil for the first time, has been omitted from the history books and almost no one knows about it. You can't even find it in the internet and my descentdents on my mothers side, the Mattei's, where protagonists. Check it out when you time: [[Intentona de Yauco]]. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 07:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

280213 +++$+++ LaughingVulcan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-04 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.220523180E09 +++$+++ Came here from the Signpost article, and I wish they'd included the paragraph of your statement before [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost\/2008-08-25\/News and notes|what was actually quoted.]]  The paragraph before was good things for all editors to keep in mind.  (As was your whole statement here.)  :)  Hope to come across and work with you on articles someday.  Best,  +++$+++ Came here from the Signpost article, and I wish they'd included the paragraph of your statement before [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-08-25/News and notes|what was actually quoted.]]  The paragraph before was good things for all editors to keep in mind.  (As was your whole statement here.)  :)  Hope to come across and work with you on articles someday.  Best, [[User:LaughingVulcan| <span style="background:	#ADDFAD;color:yellow">Laughing</span><span style="background:#FFFDD0;color:Green">Vulcan</span> ]] 03:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
280214 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280213 +++$+++ 280213 +++$+++ 2008-09-04 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.220525040E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ :Thank you. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

280215 +++$+++ 86.44.24.95 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-09 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.220975460E09 +++$+++ Likewise from the Signpost article. Your work was appreciated. Welcome \"back\". :) [[Special:Contributions\/86.44.24.95|86.44.24.95]] ( +++$+++ Likewise from the Signpost article. Your work was appreciated. Welcome "back". :) [[Special:Contributions/86.44.24.95|86.44.24.95]] ([[User talk:86.44.24.95|talk]]) 08:51, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
280216 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280215 +++$+++ 280215 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.221169740E09 +++$+++ This is a shame. Your voice on Arbcom has been consistently raised for restraint and against extreme and tenuous applications of policy. But do have more fun actually editing.   +++$+++ *This is a shame. Your voice on Arbcom has been consistently raised for restraint and against extreme and tenuous applications of policy. But do have more fun actually editing.  [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 14:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

280217 +++$+++ Arcfrk +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-14 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.221405420E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul, I was wondering if you can take a look at my recent interactions with [[User:Mathsci]] and give your opinion? I have basically already stopped actively contributing to wikipedia because of his overbearing behavior; now it appears that he is willing to go even further and has started issuing me ultimatums,  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AArcfrk&diff=238266171&oldid=237824658]. Thank you very much in advance!  +++$+++ Hi Paul, I was wondering if you can take a look at my recent interactions with [[User:Mathsci]] and give your opinion? I have basically already stopped actively contributing to wikipedia because of his overbearing behavior; now it appears that he is willing to go even further and has started issuing me ultimatums,  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AArcfrk&diff=238266171&oldid=237824658]. Thank you very much in advance! [[User:Arcfrk|Arcfrk]] ([[User talk:Arcfrk|talk]]) 08:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
280218 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280217 +++$+++ 280217 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.221446040E09 +++$+++ I'm very sorry about all this. You have certainly demonstrated considerable expertise and have made many excellent contributions. It would be very unfortunate for our encyclopedia not to have the benefit of your continued contributions. I will see what I can do. Unfortunately I have been temporarily reduced to being a one-handed typist, so my activity here will be limited for a while. In addition to Charles, three other mathematics editors whose opinions in such matters I would respect are [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]], [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] and [[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]]. I'd be willing to ask them to lend a hand, unless of course you'd rather I not. Regards,  +++$+++ :I'm very sorry about all this. You have certainly demonstrated considerable expertise and have made many excellent contributions. It would be very unfortunate for our encyclopedia not to have the benefit of your continued contributions. I will see what I can do. Unfortunately I have been temporarily reduced to being a one-handed typist, so my activity here will be limited for a while. In addition to Charles, three other mathematics editors whose opinions in such matters I would respect are [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]], [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] and [[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]]. I'd be willing to ask them to lend a hand, unless of course you'd rather I not. Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:34, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
280219 +++$+++ Arcfrk +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280217 +++$+++ 280218 +++$+++ 2008-09-14 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.221447900E09 +++$+++ Thank you! Yes, I would very much appreciate it if you do contact them (I discussed similar problems with Oleg in the past). Sorry to hear about your hand \u2014 I hope that it is nothing serious. Best wishes,  +++$+++ :: Thank you! Yes, I would very much appreciate it if you do contact them (I discussed similar problems with Oleg in the past). Sorry to hear about your hand — I hope that it is nothing serious. Best wishes, [[User:Arcfrk|Arcfrk]] ([[User talk:Arcfrk|talk]]) 20:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

18074 +++$+++ Smcafirst +++$+++ Fat pig73 +++$+++ 18074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-29 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.170065220E09 +++$+++ --<span>'''[[User:Smcafirst|Smcafirst <small>or Nick<\/small>]]''' \u2022  +++$+++ --<span>'''[[User:Smcafirst|Smcafirst <small>or Nick</small>]]''' • [[User:Smcafirst/Guestbook|<small>Sign Here</small>]]  • [[User talk:Smcafirst|''Chit-Chat'']] • [[Special:Contributions/Smcafirst|<small>''Contribs''</small>]]'''</span> at 02:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
18075 +++$+++ Doug Bell +++$+++ Fat pig73 +++$+++ 18074 +++$+++ 18074 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.171775220E09 +++$+++ The PROD tag was removed, so I've listed the article at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Saigon Passenger Transportation Company]]. \u2014 +++$+++ :The PROD tag was removed, so I've listed the article at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saigon Passenger Transportation Company]]. —[[User:Doug Bell|Doug&nbsp;Bell]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Doug Bell|talk]]</sup> 21:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

542363 +++$+++ QuasiAbstract +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542363 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-30 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.201731360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the headsup.  The edit looked of vandalism, as it only said \"CLEAR\" in the edit description.  Again, thanks. ~<font size=\"3\" face=\"Calibri\"> +++$+++ Thanks for the headsup.  The edit looked of vandalism, as it only said "CLEAR" in the edit description.  Again, thanks. ~<font size="3" face="Calibri">[[User:QuasiAbstract|QuasiAbstract]]</font> ([[User talk:QuasiAbstract|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/QuasiAbstract|contrib]]) 14:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
542364 +++$+++ QuasiAbstract +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542363 +++$+++ 542363 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.201731600E09 +++$+++ I understand, though it did look clearly (to me) as vandalism.  I'll do a bit of research first, next time. ~<font size=\"3\" face=\"Calibri\"> +++$+++ :I understand, though it did look clearly (to me) as vandalism.  I'll do a bit of research first, next time. ~<font size="3" face="Calibri">[[User:QuasiAbstract|QuasiAbstract]]</font> ([[User talk:QuasiAbstract|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/QuasiAbstract|contrib]]) 14:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

280220 +++$+++ Mathsci +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-15 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.221545700E09 +++$+++ Please see the comments on Charles Matthews' page. I spoke by telephone to [[User:R.e.b.]] about Arcfrk's problematic behaviour yesterday, before he contacted you. [[User:R.e.b.]] is one of our top mathematics editors: he is the editor who asked me to contribute to WPM. Charles knows our real life identities. Arcfrk's contributions seems to have degenerated to low-level trolling. He consistently refuses to provide sources and is more often than not wrong in what he claims. He is extremely problematic in his interactions with other mathematics editors.    +++$+++ Please see the comments on Charles Matthews' page. I spoke by telephone to [[User:R.e.b.]] about Arcfrk's problematic behaviour yesterday, before he contacted you. [[User:R.e.b.]] is one of our top mathematics editors: he is the editor who asked me to contribute to WPM. Charles knows our real life identities. Arcfrk's contributions seems to have degenerated to low-level trolling. He consistently refuses to provide sources and is more often than not wrong in what he claims. He is extremely problematic in his interactions with other mathematics editors.   [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 23:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
280221 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280220 +++$+++ 280220 +++$+++ 2008-09-16 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.221601500E09 +++$+++ I don't think that use of the word \"trolling\" is helpful here. Your description of Arcfrk, is not in accord with my experience. I've written a bit more at Charles' talk page. For the sake of centralization of discussion, I suggest we continue there.  +++$+++ :I don't think that use of the word "trolling" is helpful here. Your description of Arcfrk, is not in accord with my experience. I've written a bit more at Charles' talk page. For the sake of centralization of discussion, I suggest we continue there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

542366 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-30 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.201753080E09 +++$+++ Hi.  Why did you [[Wikipedia:Bots\/Requests_for_approval\/BaldBot|speedily approve]] {{user|BaldBot}}, even though you were the [[User_talk:Blofeld_of_SPECTRE#Your_bot|coder of it]]?  Seems fishy to me - I tell a lie, it seems totally unacceptable to me as a conflict of interest.  Anyway, my message to you is to please not do it again, and try to avoid unilaterally deciding BRFAs - wait for another member to provide input.  This whole \"double checking\" procedure is something I've advocated since before the big BAG reform, and it becomes far more necessary now that there is open access to the group.  I will be making a post to [[WT:BAG]] and [[WT:BRFA]] now to remind all of the BAG members of the need for care, and will again be advocating reversal of the current system back to a more stringent system where members are made more aware of what is expected.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi.  Why did you [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/BaldBot|speedily approve]] {{user|BaldBot}}, even though you were the [[User_talk:Blofeld_of_SPECTRE#Your_bot|coder of it]]?  Seems fishy to me - I tell a lie, it seems totally unacceptable to me as a conflict of interest.  Anyway, my message to you is to please not do it again, and try to avoid unilaterally deciding BRFAs - wait for another member to provide input.  This whole "double checking" procedure is something I've advocated since before the big BAG reform, and it becomes far more necessary now that there is open access to the group.  I will be making a post to [[WT:BAG]] and [[WT:BRFA]] now to remind all of the BAG members of the need for care, and will again be advocating reversal of the current system back to a more stringent system where members are made more aware of what is expected.  Thanks, [[User:Martinp23|Mart]]'''[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]''' 20:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
542367 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542366 +++$+++ 542366 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.201753260E09 +++$+++ I've revoked the bot approval by way of blocking the bot.  +++$+++ :I've revoked the bot approval by way of blocking the bot. [[User:Martinp23|Mart]]'''[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]''' 20:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
542368 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542366 +++$+++ 542367 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.201754460E09 +++$+++ He doesn't need a bot flag nor approval if it's manually assisted.  More details are needed, ideally on the BRFA page.  +++$+++ ::He doesn't need a bot flag nor approval if it's manually assisted.  More details are needed, ideally on the BRFA page. [[User:Martinp23|Mart]]'''[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]''' 20:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
542369 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542366 +++$+++ 542368 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.201754700E09 +++$+++ As far as I've seen in the past, we don't give bot flags to humans.  I may be wrong.  My take on it is that humans are far more prone to mess up than bots are.  Clearly, more input is needed.  +++$+++ :::As far as I've seen in the past, we don't give bot flags to humans.  I may be wrong.  My take on it is that humans are far more prone to mess up than bots are.  Clearly, more input is needed. [[User:Martinp23|Mart]]'''[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]''' 20:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

280223 +++$+++ Anarchangel +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-26 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.222429500E09 +++$+++ No problem w you changing 'writings' on [[Socrates]], and I do confess to some ignorance on the subject, but it doesn't look like vandalism to me.  +++$+++ No problem w you changing 'writings' on [[Socrates]], and I do confess to some ignorance on the subject, but it doesn't look like vandalism to me. [[User:Anarchangel|Anarchangel]] ([[User talk:Anarchangel|talk]]) 04:45, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
280224 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280223 +++$+++ 280223 +++$+++ 2008-09-26 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.222429860E09 +++$+++ The \"vandalism\" I was refering to was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Socrates&diff=241054602&oldid=240913848 this edit].  +++$+++ : The "vandalism" I was refering to was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Socrates&diff=241054602&oldid=240913848 this edit]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

280225 +++$+++ Anarchangel +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280225 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-28 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.222642140E09 +++$+++ It seems 75.164.10.218 did vandalism, 208.48.205.170 replaced that text with 'writings' when it had been 'dialogues', and you reverted the whole thing back to the original 'dialogues'. I looked at your revert on Changes and it looked like you were changing 'writings' to 'dialogues' and calling it vandalism. Solved. Hopefully this won't come up very often, it is just the sort of thing I would forget to check for even now that I know of it +++$+++ It seems 75.164.10.218 did vandalism, 208.48.205.170 replaced that text with 'writings' when it had been 'dialogues', and you reverted the whole thing back to the original 'dialogues'. I looked at your revert on Changes and it looked like you were changing 'writings' to 'dialogues' and calling it vandalism. Solved. Hopefully this won't come up very often, it is just the sort of thing I would forget to check for even now that I know of it[[User:Anarchangel|Anarchangel]] ([[User talk:Anarchangel|talk]]) 15:49, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
280226 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280225 +++$+++ 280225 +++$+++ 2008-09-28 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.222642980E09 +++$+++ Exactly.  +++$+++ :Exactly. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

542370 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-30 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.201754940E09 +++$+++ Quick note to more personally say sorry for misunderstanding and jumping to an incorrect conclusion.  +++$+++ Quick note to more personally say sorry for misunderstanding and jumping to an incorrect conclusion. [[User:Martinp23|Mart]]'''[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]''' 20:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
542371 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542370 +++$+++ 542370 +++$+++ 2008-01-31 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.201808160E09 +++$+++ I've started a thread discussing some of the issue raised by the speedy approval of this bot - [[Wikipedia talk:Bots\/Approvals group#Wikipedia:Bots\/Requests for approval\/BaldBot]]. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :I've started a thread discussing some of the issue raised by the speedy approval of this bot - [[Wikipedia talk:Bots/Approvals group#Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BaldBot]]. <font face="Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</font> 11:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

280230 +++$+++ Slrubenstein +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-29 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.225267980E09 +++$+++ I just made three proposals at [[WP:NOR]] - feel free to comment,  +++$+++ I just made three proposals at [[WP:NOR]] - feel free to comment, [[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]]   |  [[User talk:Slrubenstein|Talk]] 01:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
280231 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280230 +++$+++ 280230 +++$+++ 2008-11-14 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.226726820E09 +++$+++ VegaDark, I am not seeing the problem here, and am concerned with the tone that you are using towards Paul August, who has been a member of [[WP:ARBCOM]].  Even just looking at the history of {{user|71.201.234.208}}, the IP had been used for nothing but vandalism for years, so there was no reasonable assumption of good faith, so I'm not understanding why there was a need to unblock without consultation.  We routinely place longterm blocks on anon accounts, for example see {{tl|schoolblock}}. We also routinely place indefinite blocks on [[WP:PROXY|proxy IDs]], and these blocks can be done \"on sight\" with no need for warning. VegaDark, it would have been better in this case, and more collegial, if you ''asked'' Paul August for his reasoning, per [[WP:BLOCK#Unblocking]]. For example, you could have said, \"Hi, I was reviewing indefinite blocks on anon IPs, and I saw that you'd blocked the following IPs indefinitely (list).  I found this curious, considering that there were no warnings, and that IPs are not normally blocked for long periods. Could you perhaps help explain?  I look forward to learning more about blocking procedures on Wikipedia, thanks.\"  -- +++$+++ : VegaDark, I am not seeing the problem here, and am concerned with the tone that you are using towards Paul August, who has been a member of [[WP:ARBCOM]].  Even just looking at the history of {{user|71.201.234.208}}, the IP had been used for nothing but vandalism for years, so there was no reasonable assumption of good faith, so I'm not understanding why there was a need to unblock without consultation.  We routinely place longterm blocks on anon accounts, for example see {{tl|schoolblock}}. We also routinely place indefinite blocks on [[WP:PROXY|proxy IDs]], and these blocks can be done "on sight" with no need for warning. VegaDark, it would have been better in this case, and more collegial, if you ''asked'' Paul August for his reasoning, per [[WP:BLOCK#Unblocking]]. For example, you could have said, "Hi, I was reviewing indefinite blocks on anon IPs, and I saw that you'd blocked the following IPs indefinitely (list).  I found this curious, considering that there were no warnings, and that IPs are not normally blocked for long periods. Could you perhaps help explain?  I look forward to learning more about blocking procedures on Wikipedia, thanks."  --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 21:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
280232 +++$+++ VegaDark +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280230 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-14 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.226727420E09 +++$+++ Please review my response on my talk page.  +++$+++ :::Please review my response on my talk page. [[User:VegaDark|VegaDark]] ([[User talk:VegaDark|talk]]) 21:37, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
280233 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280230 +++$+++ 280230 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.226883600E09 +++$+++ The blocks in question are, well ... questionable. The tone of the message is ... questionable as well. Oh well, live and learn.  +++$+++ :The blocks in question are, well ... questionable. The tone of the message is ... questionable as well. Oh well, live and learn. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
280234 +++$+++ VegaDark +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280230 +++$+++ 280233 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.226888220E09 +++$+++ I apologize if you took any offense to the tone of my message, as that certainly wasn't intended. Mea culpa if so.  +++$+++ ::I apologize if you took any offense to the tone of my message, as that certainly wasn't intended. Mea culpa if so. [[User:VegaDark|VegaDark]] ([[User talk:VegaDark|talk]]) 18:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
280235 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280230 +++$+++ 280234 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.226890860E09 +++$+++ Don't fret. The patient may have been cured but the bedside manner was lacking. ''This'' patient didn't really mind, and took his medicine, however ill-tasting. The ''next'' patient might not be so agreeable ;-)  +++$+++ :::Don't fret. The patient may have been cured but the bedside manner was lacking. ''This'' patient didn't really mind, and took his medicine, however ill-tasting. The ''next'' patient might not be so agreeable ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

280236 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-20 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.227236460E09 +++$+++ Take a look at [[WP:RfAr]] if you haven't recently. Are you missing the fun yet? It's not too late for you to come back to us, I don't think. Regards,  +++$+++ Take a look at [[WP:RfAr]] if you haven't recently. Are you missing the fun yet? It's not too late for you to come back to us, I don't think. Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 19:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
280237 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280236 +++$+++ 280236 +++$+++ 2008-11-20 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.227237660E09 +++$+++ I came, I saw, I left. Haven't I cautioned you once before about the evils of sarcasm? My sincerest condolences,  +++$+++ :I came, I saw, I left. Haven't I cautioned you once before about the evils of sarcasm? My sincerest condolences, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

280238 +++$+++ CBM +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-06 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.228611960E09 +++$+++ My main concern with using the wikiproject talk page is not that I think the people there are likely to be biased, or that the review would be inappropriate. My main concern is that I don't want (non-math) editors to get the idea that the math project is a clique, or that math editors are somehow subject to special standards that can only be enforced by other math editors. I posted a longer note about that for Pohta at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Pohta_ce-am_pohtit&diff=256228115&oldid=256226629]. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>( +++$+++ My main concern with using the wikiproject talk page is not that I think the people there are likely to be biased, or that the review would be inappropriate. My main concern is that I don't want (non-math) editors to get the idea that the math project is a clique, or that math editors are somehow subject to special standards that can only be enforced by other math editors. I posted a longer note about that for Pohta at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pohta_ce-am_pohtit&diff=256228115&oldid=256226629]. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 17:06, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
280239 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280238 +++$+++ 280238 +++$+++ 2008-12-06 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.228616220E09 +++$+++ I am glad that you understand my concerns. I assure you I understand and share yours. As nearly always there are tradeoffs. We most emphatically do not want to give credence to notions of cliquishness or \"special standards\", yet the notion that, those who are familiar with an editor and their work may have useful points of view, has merit. We do not want to have inappropriate discussions at the Mathematics project page, yet how should such decisions be made, and by whom? My answer would be by  discussion and consensus of the members of that project. Not, say, by fiat from outside.   +++$+++ :I am glad that you understand my concerns. I assure you I understand and share yours. As nearly always there are tradeoffs. We most emphatically do not want to give credence to notions of cliquishness or "special standards", yet the notion that, those who are familiar with an editor and their work may have useful points of view, has merit. We do not want to have inappropriate discussions at the Mathematics project page, yet how should such decisions be made, and by whom? My answer would be by  discussion and consensus of the members of that project. Not, say, by fiat from outside.  [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
280240 +++$+++ Pohta ce-am pohtit +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280238 +++$+++ 280239 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.228695660E09 +++$+++ Sorry I interrupted the conversation that way. I just felt, and still feel that my participation on this site isn't worth my time anymore. Don't get me wrong, the math community here is one of the nicest around, but the generalized belligerence and outright silliness in the community at large is not something I care to deal with anymore, e.g. [[Wikipedia:BN#Nonsense_about_smoking_at_Adolphus79.27s_RfA|this]], [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship\/Eastlaw|this]], or [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Possible_ethnic_block_voting_in_ArbCom_elections|that]]. The Pontius Pilate [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Cold_fusion\/Proposed_decision|attitude]] of the ArbCom in cases were content is affected, which are the only ones that matter to me, doesn't inspire much confidence in future of this place. Surely the personality-driven drama will continue to attract people. After all, soap operas are profitable. The policies get applied only when someone with the right buttons or friends gets pissed off, like it happened to Topology Expert or Peter Damian. Also, search [[Wikipedia Review]] for [[John Harnad]]. Avoiding \"cliques\" in the math community sounds like a good idea only until you realize what the community at large is all about. The overt contempt for expert contributors, which has become so rampant here, and is never rebuked, reminds of a similar series of events within the Fedora community. Some devs got attacked on the support forum, which is ran without oversight from Red Hat, after said devs asked users to, horrors, submit bug reports. After a couple hundred messages on the devel list, the result was that devs boycotted in mass the user forum, and one even burned out and renounced all his involvement. The bottom line is: I have much more productive uses for my time.  +++$+++ :: Sorry I interrupted the conversation that way. I just felt, and still feel that my participation on this site isn't worth my time anymore. Don't get me wrong, the math community here is one of the nicest around, but the generalized belligerence and outright silliness in the community at large is not something I care to deal with anymore, e.g. [[Wikipedia:BN#Nonsense_about_smoking_at_Adolphus79.27s_RfA|this]], [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Eastlaw|this]], or [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Possible_ethnic_block_voting_in_ArbCom_elections|that]]. The Pontius Pilate [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Cold_fusion/Proposed_decision|attitude]] of the ArbCom in cases were content is affected, which are the only ones that matter to me, doesn't inspire much confidence in future of this place. Surely the personality-driven drama will continue to attract people. After all, soap operas are profitable. The policies get applied only when someone with the right buttons or friends gets pissed off, like it happened to Topology Expert or Peter Damian. Also, search [[Wikipedia Review]] for [[John Harnad]]. Avoiding "cliques" in the math community sounds like a good idea only until you realize what the community at large is all about. The overt contempt for expert contributors, which has become so rampant here, and is never rebuked, reminds of a similar series of events within the Fedora community. Some devs got attacked on the support forum, which is ran without oversight from Red Hat, after said devs asked users to, horrors, submit bug reports. After a couple hundred messages on the devel list, the result was that devs boycotted in mass the user forum, and one even burned out and renounced all his involvement. The bottom line is: I have much more productive uses for my time. [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit|<small>ping</small>]] 16:21, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
280241 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280238 +++$+++ 280240 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.228822800E09 +++$+++ There are many problems with the project, but I am still a believer ... and as you know, ''non nobis solum''.  +++$+++ :::There are many problems with the project, but I am still a believer ... and as you know, ''non nobis solum''. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

542385 +++$+++ Neparis +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542385 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-24 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.203854040E09 +++$+++ Hi, could you explain why you felt it necessary to make  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Neparis&diff=193623514&oldid=183543472  this edit] to ''[[WP:UP#OWN|my]]'' userpage? -  +++$+++ Hi, could you explain why you felt it necessary to make  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Neparis&diff=193623514&oldid=183543472  this edit] to ''[[WP:UP#OWN|my]]'' userpage? - [[User:Neparis|Neparis]] ([[User talk:Neparis|talk]]) 03:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
542386 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542385 +++$+++ 542385 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.203911640E09 +++$+++ Yes I can explain it, I did it because a lot of users dislike redirects and so I changed it for that reason only. <font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :Yes I can explain it, I did it because a lot of users dislike redirects and so I changed it for that reason only. <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="3">[[User:Dreamafter|<font color="crimson">~  Dreamy</font>]]</font> <font size="2">[[User talk:Dreamafter|<font color="purple"><sup>§</sup></font>]]</font> 19:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
542387 +++$+++ Neparis +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542385 +++$+++ 542386 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.203912600E09 +++$+++ (copying your reply here per my talk page instructions) Well, what you are doing is contrary to the guideline [[Wikipedia:REDIRECT#Do_not_change_links_to_redirects_that_are_not_broken|WP:REDIRECT: '''Do not change links to redirects that are not broken''']]. Maybe you were not aware of this guideline, but I think it is a very good guideline, based on consensus, and we should all follow it. I would ask you, please, not to edit my userpage again (per [[WP:UP#OWN]]). I hope you won't mind my asking you, but I really prefer to keep my userpage in my own style. Thanks! -  +++$+++ ::(copying your reply here per my talk page instructions) Well, what you are doing is contrary to the guideline [[Wikipedia:REDIRECT#Do_not_change_links_to_redirects_that_are_not_broken|WP:REDIRECT: '''Do not change links to redirects that are not broken''']]. Maybe you were not aware of this guideline, but I think it is a very good guideline, based on consensus, and we should all follow it. I would ask you, please, not to edit my userpage again (per [[WP:UP#OWN]]). I hope you won't mind my asking you, but I really prefer to keep my userpage in my own style. Thanks! - [[User:Neparis|Neparis]] ([[User talk:Neparis|talk]]) 20:10, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
542388 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542385 +++$+++ 542387 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.203912840E09 +++$+++ (copying again) If you had ''actually read'' my response, I didn't do it for myself, but for others that dislike it, I have dozens of e-mails requesting that they be changed, just so you know. <font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::(copying again) If you had ''actually read'' my response, I didn't do it for myself, but for others that dislike it, I have dozens of e-mails requesting that they be changed, just so you know. <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="3">[[User:Dreamafter|<font color="crimson">~  Dreamy</font>]]</font> <font size="2">[[User talk:Dreamafter|<font color="purple"><sup>§</sup></font>]]</font> 20:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
542389 +++$+++ Neparis +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542385 +++$+++ 542388 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.203913800E09 +++$+++ Excuse me, but I did read your reply. What you did is wrong because it is clearly against WP:REDIRECT. My userpage is my business, not yours. It does not matter how many complaints or email requests you have. You should tell those people to read the guideline. Please take my advice, or if you doubt me, check with somebody else on [[WP:AN]]. -  +++$+++ ::::Excuse me, but I did read your reply. What you did is wrong because it is clearly against WP:REDIRECT. My userpage is my business, not yours. It does not matter how many complaints or email requests you have. You should tell those people to read the guideline. Please take my advice, or if you doubt me, check with somebody else on [[WP:AN]]. - [[User:Neparis|Neparis]] ([[User talk:Neparis|talk]]) 20:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
542390 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542385 +++$+++ 542389 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.203915180E09 +++$+++ (copying again)Just so you know, I have already admitted to a mistake, stop attempting to '''''order''''' me around, I have been here longer, and have racked up more contibutions than you, and if you read the very first sentence of [[Wikipedia:UP#OWN|this]] you'll see that it ''clearly'' states that \"user space still belongs to the community\", so I am ''technically'' in the right with having edited the page, but in violation of a ''semi''-policy. <font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::::(copying again)Just so you know, I have already admitted to a mistake, stop attempting to '''''order''''' me around, I have been here longer, and have racked up more contibutions than you, and if you read the very first sentence of [[Wikipedia:UP#OWN|this]] you'll see that it ''clearly'' states that "user space still belongs to the community", so I am ''technically'' in the right with having edited the page, but in violation of a ''semi''-policy. <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="3">[[User:Dreamafter|<font color="crimson">~  Dreamy</font>]]</font> <font size="2">[[User talk:Dreamafter|<font color="purple"><sup>§</sup></font>]]</font> 20:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
542391 +++$+++ Neparis +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542385 +++$+++ 542390 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.203916500E09 +++$+++ I appreciate you were acting in good faith, and your climbdown, though perhaps you can point me to where you \"already admitted to a mistake\", because I failed to see that. Anyway, from the guideline you cited <small><blockquote>In some cases a more experienced editor may make a non-trivial edit to your userpage, in which case that editor should leave a note on your talk page explaining why this was done. This should not be done for trivial reasons.<\/blockquote><\/small> -  +++$+++ ::::::I appreciate you were acting in good faith, and your climbdown, though perhaps you can point me to where you "already admitted to a mistake", because I failed to see that. Anyway, from the guideline you cited <small><blockquote>In some cases a more experienced editor may make a non-trivial edit to your userpage, in which case that editor should leave a note on your talk page explaining why this was done. This should not be done for trivial reasons.</blockquote></small> - [[User:Neparis|Neparis]] ([[User talk:Neparis|talk]]) 21:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
542392 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542385 +++$+++ 542391 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.203916920E09 +++$+++ Ah, whatever, I probably should have mentioned it, but I thought it was much to trivial to bother mention it, ah well, sorry for not mentioning it. <font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :::::::Ah, whatever, I probably should have mentioned it, but I thought it was much to trivial to bother mention it, ah well, sorry for not mentioning it. <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="3">[[User:Dreamafter|<font color="crimson">~  Dreamy</font>]]</font> <font size="2">[[User talk:Dreamafter|<font color="purple"><sup>§</sup></font>]]</font> 21:22, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
542393 +++$+++ Neparis +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542385 +++$+++ 542392 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.203917220E09 +++$+++ Ok, no harm done, and thanks for the apology. I hope our editing paths cross again in happier circumstances. See you around. -  +++$+++ ::::::::Ok, no harm done, and thanks for the apology. I hope our editing paths cross again in happier circumstances. See you around. - [[User:Neparis|Neparis]] ([[User talk:Neparis|talk]]) 21:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

280242 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-07 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.228638240E09 +++$+++ For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see [[User:Rlevse\/Today\/Happy Me Day!]] and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.<span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see [[User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day!]] and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 00:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
280243 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280242 +++$+++ 280242 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.228649580E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  +++$+++ : Thank you. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
280244 +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280242 +++$+++ 280243 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.228655580E09 +++$+++ Paul, I don't do barnstars or any of that stuff, and I've no idea what's so special about this day. But I do want you to know that for me you're in the absolute top of all the thousands Wikipedians I know. Thank you for everything. And I really do hope that you will continue to contribute, even though Wikipedia does not deserve it. --  +++$+++ ::Paul, I don't do barnstars or any of that stuff, and I've no idea what's so special about this day. But I do want you to know that for me you're in the absolute top of all the thousands Wikipedians I know. Thank you for everything. And I really do hope that you will continue to contribute, even though Wikipedia does not deserve it. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] ([[User talk:Jitse Niesen|talk]]) 05:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
280245 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280242 +++$+++ 280244 +++$+++ 2008-12-07 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.228717380E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much Jitse. Not sure it's deserved but it is much appreciated, especially coming from you. And the feeling is mutual ;-)  +++$+++ :::Thank you very much Jitse. Not sure it's deserved but it is much appreciated, especially coming from you. And the feeling is mutual ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

570995 +++$+++ MPF +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-05 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.160084460E09 +++$+++ Hi Dfrg - it's [http:\/\/plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au\/cgi-bin\/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=sp&name=Eucalyptus~niphophila ''Eucalyptus niphophila''] (one of the easiest Eucs to identify, if it had been any other, I doubt I could have done it!) -  +++$+++ Hi Dfrg - it's [http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=sp&name=Eucalyptus~niphophila ''Eucalyptus niphophila''] (one of the easiest Eucs to identify, if it had been any other, I doubt I could have done it!) - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 14:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
570996 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 570995 +++$+++ 570995 +++$+++ 2006-10-08 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.160373300E09 +++$+++ Thanks MPF! I'd be lost without you. And sorry for the late reply. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Thanks MPF! I'd be lost without you. And sorry for the late reply. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 22:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

280246 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280246 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-09 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.228821240E09 +++$+++ I started editing the article [[dependent and independent variables]], which was a real mess, and added some cited content under the math section.  However, there is all this content under the statistics section that is uncited, and wanted to know if someone would help me find sources for this information, or challenge and remove it?  +++$+++ I started editing the article [[dependent and independent variables]], which was a real mess, and added some cited content under the math section.  However, there is all this content under the statistics section that is uncited, and wanted to know if someone would help me find sources for this information, or challenge and remove it? [[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 03:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
280247 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280246 +++$+++ 280246 +++$+++ 2009-01-20 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.232502720E09 +++$+++ Thanks Flo.  +++$+++ :Thanks Flo. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

280248 +++$+++ Michael Hardy +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-03 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.236145020E09 +++$+++ Do you know that in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Geoffrey_Martin_(mathematician)&diff=40872714&oldid=40433756 this edit], you changed the article to an article about a different person?  The Australian combinatorialist and the American Mathematical physicist born in Connecticut and now at the University of Toledo are two different people.  +++$+++ Do you know that in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Geoffrey_Martin_(mathematician)&diff=40872714&oldid=40433756 this edit], you changed the article to an article about a different person?  The Australian combinatorialist and the American Mathematical physicist born in Connecticut and now at the University of Toledo are two different people. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 21:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
280249 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280248 +++$+++ 280248 +++$+++ 2009-03-04 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.236155340E09 +++$+++ Hi Michael. Don't remember anything about this edit. Can't vouch for or explain it at the moment. I'll look into it more when I get a chance. Feel free to edit it however you think appropriate.  +++$+++ :Hi Michael. Don't remember anything about this edit. Can't vouch for or explain it at the moment. I'll look into it more when I get a chance. Feel free to edit it however you think appropriate. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
280250 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280248 +++$+++ 280249 +++$+++ 2009-03-08 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.236549480E09 +++$+++ Eeek! But though I still have the mop and bucket, don't know that I am much of a custodian.  +++$+++ ::Eeek! But though I still have the mop and bucket, don't know that I am much of a custodian. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:58, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

280251 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280251 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-04 10:06:00 +++$+++ 1.241456760E09 +++$+++ I'm getting pretty tired of all this back and forth on Cantor re Judaism. Of course I would very gladly do something to address the issue myself, but as you may or may not know, I no longer have access to English-language libraries. I only have access to the Internet. Would you and perhaps others  be willing to access all of the sources listed etc. and take on the task of revamping the \"Ancestry\" section, addressing each and every statement\/point in a non-OR and non-POV manner? Geometry guy recommended your name in this respect. I'm also contacting Trovatore and Pmanderson. Tks [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ I'm getting pretty tired of all this back and forth on Cantor re Judaism. Of course I would very gladly do something to address the issue myself, but as you may or may not know, I no longer have access to English-language libraries. I only have access to the Internet. Would you and perhaps others  be willing to access all of the sources listed etc. and take on the task of revamping the "Ancestry" section, addressing each and every statement/point in a non-OR and non-POV manner? Geometry guy recommended your name in this respect. I'm also contacting Trovatore and Pmanderson. Tks [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 10:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
280252 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280251 +++$+++ 280251 +++$+++ 2009-05-05 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.241563020E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but I don't have the time at the moment to deal with this.  +++$+++ :Sorry, but I don't have the time at the moment to deal with this. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

321347 +++$+++ Rbkinar +++$+++ Modernist +++$+++ 321347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-17 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.192649100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Rbkinar|Rbkinar]] 12:25, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
321348 +++$+++ Modernist +++$+++ Modernist +++$+++ 321347 +++$+++ 321347 +++$+++ 2007-10-17 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.192649820E09 +++$+++ Aside from the fact that it is absolutely unnecessary and gratuitous given the many photographs that exist of Picasso and the photo already there, its a second rate illustration in an article about the greatest artist of the twentieth century. It isn't appropriate. Please - I left your other pictures alone and I would suggest we leave it at that.  +++$+++ :Aside from the fact that it is absolutely unnecessary and gratuitous given the many photographs that exist of Picasso and the photo already there, its a second rate illustration in an article about the greatest artist of the twentieth century. It isn't appropriate. Please - I left your other pictures alone and I would suggest we leave it at that. [[User:Modernist|Modernist]] 12:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

280253 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-12 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.242156480E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that, and thank you very much for fixing them! [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Kirill Lokshin|[talk]]]&nbsp; +++$+++ Sorry about that, and thank you very much for fixing them! [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Kirill Lokshin|[talk]]]&nbsp;[[User:Kirill Lokshin/Professionalism|[pf]]]</sup> 12:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
280254 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280253 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-12 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.242158580E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. A bit of regex magic made the job relatively painless. I wanted you to know about it so you might be forewarned with respect to other moves like this.  +++$+++ ::You're welcome. A bit of regex magic made the job relatively painless. I wanted you to know about it so you might be forewarned with respect to other moves like this. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:03, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

542399 +++$+++ Milk's Favorite Cookie +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542399 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.204707240E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Milk%27s_Favorite_Cookie\/Archive_5#Heuschrecke_10 See how honest I am? :)] BTW, I voted in the FA :) -  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Milk%27s_Favorite_Cookie/Archive_5#Heuschrecke_10 See how honest I am? :)] BTW, I voted in the FA :) - [[User:Milk's Favorite Cookie|'''''<font face="High Thhfhfhfower Text" size="3px" color="#4D0100">Milk's</font>''''']] [[User talk:Milk's Favorite Cookie|'''''<font face="High Tower fhfhfhText" size="3px" color="#4D0100">Favorite</font>''''']] [[Special:Contributions/Milk's Favorite Cookie|'''''<font face="High Towfhfhfher Text" size="3px" color="#4D0100">Cookie</font>''''']] 00:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
542400 +++$+++ Milk's Favorite Cookie +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542399 +++$+++ 542399 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.204781400E09 +++$+++ I don't understand. Do I get the barnstars again? You already gave them to me once... -  +++$+++ :I don't understand. Do I get the barnstars again? You already gave them to me once... - [[User:Milk's Favorite Cookie|'''''<font face="High Thhfhfhfower Text" size="3px" color="#4D0100">Milk's</font>''''']] [[User talk:Milk's Favorite Cookie|'''''<font face="High Tower fhfhfhText" size="3px" color="#4D0100">Favorite</font>''''']] [[Special:Contributions/Milk's Favorite Cookie|'''''<font face="High Towfhfhfher Text" size="3px" color="#4D0100">Cookie</font>''''']] 21:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

542401 +++$+++ elcobbola +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542401 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.204710780E09 +++$+++ Definitely, armor was just meant to be a place holder.  Feel free (obviously) to change anything you want; my goal was to just get the \"flow\" organized.  +++$+++ Definitely, armor was just meant to be a place holder.  Feel free (obviously) to change anything you want; my goal was to just get the "flow" organized. [[User:elcobbola|<font color="red"><i>'''ЭLСОВВОLД'''</i></font>]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User talk:elcobbola|talk]]</sub> 01:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
542402 +++$+++ elcobbola +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542401 +++$+++ 542401 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.204768560E09 +++$+++ Ha, don\u2019t put too much confidence in my linguistic abilities. ;)  Perhaps the \u201cDescription\u201d section could be divided into two, more general parts (e.g. \u201cTurret\u201d - the distinguishing feature - and \u201cChassis\u201d)?  Ammo, howitzer, etc. info would go in \"turret\" and engine, gearbox, weight, armor, etc. in \"chassis\".  Obviously, there would be some overlap (e.g. armor), but I don\u2019t know that there\u2019s really a right way to do it.  +++$+++ :Ha, don’t put too much confidence in my linguistic abilities. ;)  Perhaps the “Description” section could be divided into two, more general parts (e.g. “Turret” - the distinguishing feature - and “Chassis”)?  Ammo, howitzer, etc. info would go in "turret" and engine, gearbox, weight, armor, etc. in "chassis".  Obviously, there would be some overlap (e.g. armor), but I don’t know that there’s really a right way to do it. [[User:elcobbola|<font color="red"><i>'''ЭLСОВВОLД'''</i></font>]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User talk:elcobbola|talk]]</sub> 17:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

280258 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-25 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.243242960E09 +++$+++ Hey FayssalF, what's the deal with the \"(Ctrl-click)\"> (Ctrl-click)\"> (Ctrl-click)\"> (Ctrl-click)\">\" in  (Ctrl-click)\"> (Ctrl-click)\"> (Ctrl-click)\">[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/Scientology\/Proposed_decision&diff=292128263&oldid=292127085 these edits]?  +++$+++ Hey FayssalF, what's the deal with the "(Ctrl-click)"> (Ctrl-click)"> (Ctrl-click)"> (Ctrl-click)">" in  (Ctrl-click)"> (Ctrl-click)"> (Ctrl-click)">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Scientology/Proposed_decision&diff=292128263&oldid=292127085 these edits]? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]][[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
280259 +++$+++ FayssalF +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280258 +++$+++ 280258 +++$+++ 2009-05-25 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.243243620E09 +++$+++ I am having the same question. I've just asked the clerks to figure it out. I'll stop voting till tomorrow. --  +++$+++ :I am having the same question. I've just asked the clerks to figure it out. I'll stop voting till tomorrow. -- [[User:FayssalF|<font size="2px" face="Verdana"><font color="DarkSlateBlue">FayssalF</font></font>]] - <small><sup>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: gold">''Wiki me up''® </font>]]</sup></small> 02:27, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
280260 +++$+++ Soap +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280258 +++$+++ 280259 +++$+++ 2009-05-25 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.243303860E09 +++$+++ it's a bug in [[WP:WikEd|WikEd]].  The problem should be pretty much cleared up now.  ''<B> +++$+++ ::it's a bug in [[WP:WikEd|WikEd]].  The problem should be pretty much cleared up now.  ''<B>[[User:Soap|Soap]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:Soap|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|Contributions]]</sub> 19:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

527307 +++$+++ Thewellman +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527307 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-10 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.255181100E09 +++$+++ I finally found the photo we discussed last year, and added it to General Nyland's article.  I was surprised to discover there is a second general in the photo -- Lieutenant General Bruce B. Knutson.  It may be rather rare to find a single photo of so few midshipmen (5) including more than one future Marine Corps General.  +++$+++ I finally found the photo we discussed last year, and added it to General Nyland's article.  I was surprised to discover there is a second general in the photo -- Lieutenant General Bruce B. Knutson.  It may be rather rare to find a single photo of so few midshipmen (5) including more than one future Marine Corps General. [[User:Thewellman|Thewellman]] ([[User talk:Thewellman|talk]]) 06:25, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
527308 +++$+++ Thewellman +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527307 +++$+++ 527307 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.256246640E09 +++$+++ I don't know if copies of University of New Mexico Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps public affairs publications still exist.  I recall at least two.  There was a quarterly newsletter called the ''Sunline'' and an annual yearbook called the ''Mark ##'', where ## were the last two digits of the year of publication 19##.  I scanned the image from a print I salvaged 40 years ago from discarded pre-publication masters.  +++$+++ :I don't know if copies of University of New Mexico Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps public affairs publications still exist.  I recall at least two.  There was a quarterly newsletter called the ''Sunline'' and an annual yearbook called the ''Mark ##'', where ## were the last two digits of the year of publication 19##.  I scanned the image from a print I salvaged 40 years ago from discarded pre-publication masters. [[User:Thewellman|Thewellman]] ([[User talk:Thewellman|talk]]) 14:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

280261 +++$+++ 128.100.5.116 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280261 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-26 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.243375980E09 +++$+++ I don't understand why you've twice reverted the article [[square root]] to make it contain \"Even in [[non-standard positional numeral systems]], the only notable exception is [[golden ratio base]].\"  What do you think that means, and why is it preferable to attaching the dependent clause \"Even in [[non-standard positional numeral systems]]\" to the clause it actually refers to, which is in the previous sentence? [[Special:Contributions\/128.100.5.116|128.100.5.116]] ( +++$+++ I don't understand why you've twice reverted the article [[square root]] to make it contain "Even in [[non-standard positional numeral systems]], the only notable exception is [[golden ratio base]]."  What do you think that means, and why is it preferable to attaching the dependent clause "Even in [[non-standard positional numeral systems]]" to the clause it actually refers to, which is in the previous sentence? [[Special:Contributions/128.100.5.116|128.100.5.116]] ([[User talk:128.100.5.116|talk]]) 15:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
280262 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280261 +++$+++ 280261 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.243380720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
280263 +++$+++ 128.100.5.116 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280261 +++$+++ 280262 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.243384200E09 +++$+++ Well, first of all, I don't see this paragraph as talking about any irrational numbers other than the square roots of non-square integers, so I don't know how you get from either wording of it to a statement that ''all'' irrational numbers have nonterminating representations in ''all'' bases.  The more limited statement that all irrational square roots of integers have nonterminating representations is also as you say \"problematic\" (indeed, false) - the golden ratio base isn't the only exception, you can easily construct, say, a number system with base root-two in which root-two will terminate.  I don't know why golden-ratio is a more notable nonstandard exceptional base than root-two; I'm pretty sure I've read about both in the recreational math literature, though I don't have references handy.  Anyway, my only real interest was in the grammar.  I think the wording I proposed is no less factually correct than the wording you reverted it to, and has the advantage of being closer to English.  But I'm not willing to spend time writing new material to correct the factual problems and make the article really cover the material perfectly; I meant to make a simple punctuation fix and was quite surprised anyone would bother to disagree.  I'll leave it alone at this point. [[Special:Contributions\/128.100.5.116|128.100.5.116]] ( +++$+++ ::Well, first of all, I don't see this paragraph as talking about any irrational numbers other than the square roots of non-square integers, so I don't know how you get from either wording of it to a statement that ''all'' irrational numbers have nonterminating representations in ''all'' bases.  The more limited statement that all irrational square roots of integers have nonterminating representations is also as you say "problematic" (indeed, false) - the golden ratio base isn't the only exception, you can easily construct, say, a number system with base root-two in which root-two will terminate.  I don't know why golden-ratio is a more notable nonstandard exceptional base than root-two; I'm pretty sure I've read about both in the recreational math literature, though I don't have references handy.  Anyway, my only real interest was in the grammar.  I think the wording I proposed is no less factually correct than the wording you reverted it to, and has the advantage of being closer to English.  But I'm not willing to spend time writing new material to correct the factual problems and make the article really cover the material perfectly; I meant to make a simple punctuation fix and was quite surprised anyone would bother to disagree.  I'll leave it alone at this point. [[Special:Contributions/128.100.5.116|128.100.5.116]] ([[User talk:128.100.5.116|talk]]) 17:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
280264 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280261 +++$+++ 280261 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.243386360E09 +++$+++ I will copy the above discussion to [[talk:Square root]] and reply there.  +++$+++ :I will copy the above discussion to [[talk:Square root]] and reply there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:06, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

280265 +++$+++ Anonymous Dissident +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280265 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-26 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.243377240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help. &mdash;<strong> +++$+++ Thanks for your help. &mdash;<strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 15:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
280266 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280265 +++$+++ 280265 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.243385940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

542410 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542410 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-16 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.205715360E09 +++$+++ Could you please unprotect [[Selena Gomez]] as the expiry date didn't work, and it still cannot be edited as an I.P. ~ Cheers!  +++$+++ Could you please unprotect [[Selena Gomez]] as the expiry date didn't work, and it still cannot be edited as an I.P. ~ Cheers! [[User:Dreamafter|<font color="crimson">Dreamy</font>]] [[User talk:Dreamafter|<font color="purple"><sup>§</sup></font>]] 17:56, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
542411 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542410 +++$+++ 542410 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.205716560E09 +++$+++ It was set to expire tomorrow, the 17th of March, at 9:21pm.  I went ahead and unprotected it early.  Let me know if the vandalism starts again...  +++$+++ :It was set to expire tomorrow, the 17th of March, at 9:21pm.  I went ahead and unprotected it early.  Let me know if the vandalism starts again... [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 18:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
542412 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542410 +++$+++ 542411 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.205716800E09 +++$+++ Oh ya... I thought today was the 26 of March... Sorry for that... But you are great, and really fast at helping users! ~ Cheers!  +++$+++ ::Oh ya... I thought today was the 26 of March... Sorry for that... But you are great, and really fast at helping users! ~ Cheers! [[User:Dreamafter|<font color="crimson">Dreamy</font>]] [[User talk:Dreamafter|<font color="purple"><sup>§</sup></font>]] 18:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

280267 +++$+++ Risker +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-06 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.244345580E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to pop in and say thank you for all of the work you have been doing to make sure that decisions are well-formatted, properly assessed, and then statistically analysed. I've found myself referring to the stats periodically, and really appreciate that the decisions are properly kept in order. You know...you could come back for the last few months of your elected term... :-)   +++$+++ Just wanted to pop in and say thank you for all of the work you have been doing to make sure that decisions are well-formatted, properly assessed, and then statistically analysed. I've found myself referring to the stats periodically, and really appreciate that the decisions are properly kept in order. You know...you could come back for the last few months of your elected term... :-)  [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 20:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
280268 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280267 +++$+++ 280267 +++$+++ 2009-06-06 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.244345820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the thanks. Glad someone thinks these things are useful. Can't say how much longer I will continue to this. As for my coming back ... no thanks ;-)  +++$+++ :Thanks for the thanks. Glad someone thinks these things are useful. Can't say how much longer I will continue to this. As for my coming back ... no thanks ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:37, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

280269 +++$+++ Yannismarou +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-09 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.244609160E09 +++$+++ Breaks is just a way of citing multiple citations, which I first used in [[El Greco]], and then evolved in [[Roman-Persian Wars]] to distinct between primary and secondary sources, but I have no intention to impose them. It is up to you! Of course, I'll add any sources I've used before going to sleep, and it is up to you to judge is these sources should stay or go. Cheers!-- +++$+++ Breaks is just a way of citing multiple citations, which I first used in [[El Greco]], and then evolved in [[Roman-Persian Wars]] to distinct between primary and secondary sources, but I have no intention to impose them. It is up to you! Of course, I'll add any sources I've used before going to sleep, and it is up to you to judge is these sources should stay or go. Cheers!--[[User:Yannismarou|Yannismarou]] ([[User talk:Yannismarou|talk]]) 21:46, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
280270 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280269 +++$+++ 280269 +++$+++ 2009-06-09 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.244609640E09 +++$+++ Well, to me, the breaks just make the \"Notes\" section, unnecessarily longer. As for quality of the sources I will take a look once you tell me what they are. And as for who is to judge, that will be all of us of course ;-) By the way thanks for your good work here.  +++$+++ :Well, to me, the breaks just make the "Notes" section, unnecessarily longer. As for quality of the sources I will take a look once you tell me what they are. And as for who is to judge, that will be all of us of course ;-) By the way thanks for your good work here. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
280271 +++$+++ Yannismarou +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280269 +++$+++ 280270 +++$+++ 2009-06-09 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.244609820E09 +++$+++ As I said in the FARC, they are sources from google booking. I have no access to printed sources, and therefore this is only what I find in the Google Book (focusing to as modern as possible secondary sources of established publishers). If you want I can add the urls in the sources.-- +++$+++ ::As I said in the FARC, they are sources from google booking. I have no access to printed sources, and therefore this is only what I find in the Google Book (focusing to as modern as possible secondary sources of established publishers). If you want I can add the urls in the sources.--[[User:Yannismarou|Yannismarou]] ([[User talk:Yannismarou|talk]]) 21:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
280272 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280269 +++$+++ 280269 +++$+++ 2009-06-09 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.244610060E09 +++$+++ The urls would be helpful.  +++$+++ :The urls would be helpful. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
280273 +++$+++ Yannismarou +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280269 +++$+++ 280272 +++$+++ 2009-06-09 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.244611560E09 +++$+++ Here Mitchel has a very long and interesting analysis on Attalus' Gaul War; here is the url, in case you want to add something to the article: [http:\/\/books.google.be\/books?id=pUYtwuve40kC&pg=PT45&dq=Attalus,+Gauls,+Eumenes&lr=&as_brr=3&ei=lNwuSvK9A5OCygT_no2tBw&hl=en#PPT42,M1].-- +++$+++ ::Here Mitchel has a very long and interesting analysis on Attalus' Gaul War; here is the url, in case you want to add something to the article: [http://books.google.be/books?id=pUYtwuve40kC&pg=PT45&dq=Attalus,+Gauls,+Eumenes&lr=&as_brr=3&ei=lNwuSvK9A5OCygT_no2tBw&hl=en#PPT42,M1].--[[User:Yannismarou|Yannismarou]] ([[User talk:Yannismarou|talk]]) 22:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

542414 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542414 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-20 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.206076620E09 +++$+++ Okay. When will it start?  +++$+++ Okay. When will it start? [[User:Stormtracker94|<font face="Bauhaus 93" size="2.0" color="#002649"> STORMTRACKER</font>]]  [[User talk:Stormtracker94|<font face="Times New Roman" size="2.3" color="#DAA520"> '''94''' </font>]] <sup> Go [[Notre Dame Fighting Irish|Irish!]] </sup> 22:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
542415 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542414 +++$+++ 542414 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.206077280E09 +++$+++ I'll deliver the messages informing the users.  +++$+++ : I'll deliver the messages informing the users. [[User:Stormtracker94|<font face="Bauhaus 93" size="2.0" color="#002649"> STORMTRACKER</font>]]  [[User talk:Stormtracker94|<font face="Times New Roman" size="2.3" color="#DAA520"> '''94''' </font>]] <sup> Go [[Notre Dame Fighting Irish|Irish!]] </sup> 22:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
542416 +++$+++ Milk's Favorite Cookie +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542414 +++$+++ 542415 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.206078600E09 +++$+++ Are you going to take a count of everyone's mainspace edits as of the moment? BTW, if you want to deliver any notices to the contestants - I have a [[user:Newsletterbot|a bot]] -  +++$+++ ::Are you going to take a count of everyone's mainspace edits as of the moment? BTW, if you want to deliver any notices to the contestants - I have a [[user:Newsletterbot|a bot]] - [[User:Milk's Favorite Cookie|<font face="High Tower Text" size="3px" color="#4D0100">Milk's</font>''''']] [[User talk:Milk's Favorite Cookie|'''''<font face="High Tower Text" size="3px" color="#4D0100">Favorite</font>''''']] [[Special:Contributions/Milk's Favorite Cookie|'''''<font face="High Tower Text" size="3px" color="#4D0100">Cookie</font>]] 22:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
542417 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542414 +++$+++ 542416 +++$+++ 2008-03-21 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.206140520E09 +++$+++ I created standings and made a few small rule changes to make the competition a bit better. The tourney has begun.  +++$+++ ::: I created standings and made a few small rule changes to make the competition a bit better. The tourney has begun. [[User:Stormtracker94|<font face="Bauhaus 93" size="2.0" color="#002649"> STORMTRACKER</font>]]  [[User talk:Stormtracker94|<font face="Times New Roman" size="2.3" color="#DAA520"> '''94''' </font>]] <sup> Go [[Notre Dame Fighting Irish|Irish!]] </sup> 16:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

527309 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527309 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-13 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.255476540E09 +++$+++ Haven't seen you around much lately. Hope all is well with you. ''' +++$+++ Haven't seen you around much lately. Hope all is well with you. '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000">bahamut0013</span>]]'''<span style="background:#D2B48C"><small>[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<sup style="color:#000;margin-left:-1px">words</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<sub style="color:#000;margin-left:-16px">deeds</sub>]]</small></span> 16:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
527310 +++$+++ Bahamut0013 +++$+++ ERcheck +++$+++ 527309 +++$+++ 527309 +++$+++ 2009-11-01 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.257117960E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Bahamut0013&curid=9779673&diff=323273006&oldid=319585915 'Bout time], doncha think? :D ''' +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bahamut0013&curid=9779673&diff=323273006&oldid=319585915 'Bout time], doncha think? :D '''[[User:Bahamut0013|<span style="background:#918151;color:#000">bahamut0013</span>]]'''<span style="background:#D2B48C"><small>[[User talk:Bahamut0013|<sup style="color:#000;margin-left:-1px">words</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|<sub style="color:#000;margin-left:-16px">deeds</sub>]]</small></span> 15:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

280274 +++$+++ 24.13.84.240 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-10 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.244631180E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/24.13.84.240|24.13.84.240]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/24.13.84.240|24.13.84.240]] ([[User talk:24.13.84.240|talk]]) 03:53, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
280275 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280274 +++$+++ 280274 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.244662860E09 +++$+++ I didn't think changing the language tag for Finegan's Wake from \"English\" to \"Idioglossia\" was a serious edit, hence the revert. You say you made the edit in good faith, and I will take your word for it. Thus I apologize for having not given a reason for my revert, which would have been that, as our article clearly says, despite Joyce's use of what might be called  \"idioglossia\", Finnegans wake is nevertheless written \"basically\" in English.   +++$+++ :I didn't think changing the language tag for Finegan's Wake from "English" to "Idioglossia" was a serious edit, hence the revert. You say you made the edit in good faith, and I will take your word for it. Thus I apologize for having not given a reason for my revert, which would have been that, as our article clearly says, despite Joyce's use of what might be called  "idioglossia", Finnegans wake is nevertheless written "basically" in English.  [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 12:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

280276 +++$+++ Risker +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-10 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.244686260E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case&curid=22747298&diff=295630875&oldid=295629830#St._John.27s_University_.28NY.29_Article] Okay, so maybe it isn't the way some others would have done it, but is there a reason for the comment being removed? Perhaps you have an alternate suggestion for me?   +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&curid=22747298&diff=295630875&oldid=295629830#St._John.27s_University_.28NY.29_Article] Okay, so maybe it isn't the way some others would have done it, but is there a reason for the comment being removed? Perhaps you have an alternate suggestion for me?  [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 19:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
280277 +++$+++ Risker +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280276 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.244687280E09 +++$+++ Aw geez, and here I was hoping you might have a better idea. :-)  No worries, and thanks.   +++$+++ ::Aw geez, and here I was hoping you might have a better idea. :-)  No worries, and thanks.  [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 19:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

542421 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-25 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.206510420E09 +++$+++ I recently found your name on the member page, and, knowing that you are fair, honest and not above giving out criticism, so I was wondering if you could check [[Heuschrecke 10|this page]] for basic alterations and copy-editing. Only help out there if you have the spare time, and if you're interested. ~ Cheers!  +++$+++ I recently found your name on the member page, and, knowing that you are fair, honest and not above giving out criticism, so I was wondering if you could check [[Heuschrecke 10|this page]] for basic alterations and copy-editing. Only help out there if you have the spare time, and if you're interested. ~ Cheers! [[User:Dreamafter|<font color="crimson">Dreamy</font>]] [[User talk:Dreamafter|<font color="purple"><sup>§</sup></font>]] 22:47, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
542422 +++$+++  CattleGirl +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542421 +++$+++ 542421 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.206551940E09 +++$+++ Sorry I couldn't help more! ''' +++$+++ :Sorry I couldn't help more! '''[[User:CattleGirl|<font color="blue">Cat</font><font color="darkblue">tleG</font><font color="black">irl</font>]]''' <sup>''[[User talk: CattleGirl| talk]]''</sup> 10:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
542423 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542421 +++$+++ 542422 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.206590160E09 +++$+++ I am fine, how would you prefer that the references were better laid out? ~ Cheers!  +++$+++ ::I am fine, how would you prefer that the references were better laid out? ~ Cheers! [[User:Dreamafter|<font color="crimson">Dreamy</font>]] [[User talk:Dreamafter|<font color="purple"><sup>§</sup></font>]] 20:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
542424 +++$+++  CattleGirl +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542421 +++$+++ 542423 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.206718680E09 +++$+++ I had some spare time, so I fixed a couple more things. With the references, they're pretty good, I've just deleted a couple of refs that were already cited just beforehand (you can see what I've done in the history of the page) or shuffled around the order they were in. It's looking good! Cheers- ''' +++$+++ :::I had some spare time, so I fixed a couple more things. With the references, they're pretty good, I've just deleted a couple of refs that were already cited just beforehand (you can see what I've done in the history of the page) or shuffled around the order they were in. It's looking good! Cheers- '''[[User:CattleGirl|<font color="blue">Cat</font><font color="darkblue">tleG</font><font color="black">irl</font>]]''' <sup>''[[User talk: CattleGirl| talk]]''</sup> 08:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

280278 +++$+++  +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-11 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.244721000E09 +++$+++ It seems that discussion is occurring in several locations.  Could you please comment at [[Talk:Sophocles\/GA1]] on the status of this article in terms of retaining its rating.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|c]]\/ +++$+++ It seems that discussion is occurring in several locations.  Could you please comment at [[Talk:Sophocles/GA1]] on the status of this article in terms of retaining its rating.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 04:50, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
280279 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280278 +++$+++ 280278 +++$+++ 2009-06-11 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.244751780E09 +++$+++ I've commented there.  +++$+++ :I've commented there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:23, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

280280 +++$+++ Tiptoety +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-11 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.244774760E09 +++$+++ We both seemed to have overlooked R7 and R7.1, they both appear to be equally passing, but I personally feel 7.1 is the preferred one. Thoughts?  +++$+++ We both seemed to have overlooked R7 and R7.1, they both appear to be equally passing, but I personally feel 7.1 is the preferred one. Thoughts? [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 19:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
280281 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280280 +++$+++ 280280 +++$+++ 2009-06-11 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.244775420E09 +++$+++ Yes R7.1 is clearly preferred over R7.  +++$+++ :Yes R7.1 is clearly preferred over R7. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:57, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

542425 +++$+++ GlobeGores +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542425 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.206666060E09 +++$+++ Hello Dreamafter, I have a question about the page I linked to in the header. In February 2007 (approximately a year ago) it looks as though [[User:Jaranda]] (now [[User:Secret|Secret]]) deleted the page, though I could not find a relevant AFD\/PROD\/CSD tag. What was the precedent for deleting the article? Since it's in the \"To be written\" section of the AF Wikiproject box, I was thinking of creating it (since I've seen there for several months). Hope you can help me. Thanks, [[Special:Contributions\/GlobeGores|GlobeGores]] ([[User talk:GlobeGores|talk page]] |  +++$+++ Hello Dreamafter, I have a question about the page I linked to in the header. In February 2007 (approximately a year ago) it looks as though [[User:Jaranda]] (now [[User:Secret|Secret]]) deleted the page, though I could not find a relevant AFD/PROD/CSD tag. What was the precedent for deleting the article? Since it's in the "To be written" section of the AF Wikiproject box, I was thinking of creating it (since I've seen there for several months). Hope you can help me. Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/GlobeGores|GlobeGores]] ([[User talk:GlobeGores|talk page]] | [[User:GlobeGores|user page]]) 18:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
542426 +++$+++ GlobeGores +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542425 +++$+++ 542425 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.206686160E09 +++$+++ Okay, I see it at [[User:Dreamafter\/Drafts]]. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions\/GlobeGores|GlobeGores]] ([[User talk:GlobeGores|talk page]] |  +++$+++ :Okay, I see it at [[User:Dreamafter/Drafts]]. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/GlobeGores|GlobeGores]] ([[User talk:GlobeGores|talk page]] | [[User:GlobeGores|user page]]) 23:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
542427 +++$+++ GlobeGores +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542425 +++$+++ 542426 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.206691620E09 +++$+++ I'm drafting a (originally) draft of the article at [[User:GlobeGores\/Magic (Artemis Fowl)]] Feel free to change anything or improve anything you see there! Cheers, [[Special:Contributions\/GlobeGores|GlobeGores]] ([[User talk:GlobeGores|talk page]] |  +++$+++ ::I'm drafting a (originally) draft of the article at [[User:GlobeGores/Magic (Artemis Fowl)]] Feel free to change anything or improve anything you see there! Cheers, [[Special:Contributions/GlobeGores|GlobeGores]] ([[User talk:GlobeGores|talk page]] | [[User:GlobeGores|user page]]) 01:07, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

280283 +++$+++ Franamax +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-13 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.244957580E09 +++$+++ Best I can do at the moment.  +++$+++ Best I can do at the moment. [[User:Franamax|Franamax]] ([[User talk:Franamax|talk]]) 22:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
280284 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280283 +++$+++ 280283 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.244958120E09 +++$+++ Not bad ;-)  +++$+++ :Not bad ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 22:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
280285 +++$+++ Bigtimepeace +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280283 +++$+++ 280284 +++$+++ 2009-06-13 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.244961420E09 +++$+++ A sock puppet, a meat puppet and Jimbo walk into a bar. The sock puppet happened to be a rabbi, and the meat puppet was a priest. However that isn't really important for the purposes of this joke. Anyhow the rabbi and the priest and Jimbo got to talking about religion and it was a pretty good conversation, but they were in London where (I'm told) the pubs close early, so they had to cut it short which was too bad because they were all enjoying themselves. One day later an admin blocked the rabbi and priest for sock and meat puppetry respectively without even knowing they had gotten a wee bit pissed with Jimbo the night before. Someone (probably a rollbacker, knowing ''them'') thought about starting an AN\/I thread about how ironic the whole situation was but then got distracted by something else and didn't bother. Look, I didn't say it was a joke. Fine, I did, but I was lying when I said that. And why in the hell did you make me do this anyway? -- +++$+++ ::A sock puppet, a meat puppet and Jimbo walk into a bar. The sock puppet happened to be a rabbi, and the meat puppet was a priest. However that isn't really important for the purposes of this joke. Anyhow the rabbi and the priest and Jimbo got to talking about religion and it was a pretty good conversation, but they were in London where (I'm told) the pubs close early, so they had to cut it short which was too bad because they were all enjoying themselves. One day later an admin blocked the rabbi and priest for sock and meat puppetry respectively without even knowing they had gotten a wee bit pissed with Jimbo the night before. Someone (probably a rollbacker, knowing ''them'') thought about starting an AN/I thread about how ironic the whole situation was but then got distracted by something else and didn't bother. Look, I didn't say it was a joke. Fine, I did, but I was lying when I said that. And why in the hell did you make me do this anyway? --[[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] |  [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 23:37, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
280286 +++$+++ Franamax +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280283 +++$+++ 280285 +++$+++ 2009-06-14 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.244964360E09 +++$+++ Wow, that could go into Wiktionary as an example of [[wikt:lame effort|lame effort]]! Take my advice, on your next try, mention the 12-inch pianist sitting in the corner. ;) I am <u>sooo<\/u> going to win this contest... :)  +++$+++ :::Wow, that could go into Wiktionary as an example of [[wikt:lame effort|lame effort]]! Take my advice, on your next try, mention the 12-inch pianist sitting in the corner. ;) I am <u>sooo</u> going to win this contest... :) [[User:Franamax|Franamax]] ([[User talk:Franamax|talk]]) 00:26, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
280287 +++$+++ Bigtimepeace +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280283 +++$+++ 280286 +++$+++ 2009-06-14 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.244966760E09 +++$+++ It's very meta&mdash;the humor is at an extraordinarily high level. I'm not even allowed to talk about it with you! -- +++$+++ ::::It's very meta&mdash;the humor is at an extraordinarily high level. I'm not even allowed to talk about it with you! --[[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] |  [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 01:06, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
280288 +++$+++ Franamax +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280283 +++$+++ 280287 +++$+++ 2009-06-14 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.244968500E09 +++$+++ Oops, you're one of them as uses em-dashes instead of plain 'ol hyphens. If you're reckless enough to use the extra four bytes of server space, I'm clearly out of my element here. Where are the protective [[User talk:Bishzilla|monster]]s when you need help?  +++$+++ :::::Oops, you're one of them as uses em-dashes instead of plain 'ol hyphens. If you're reckless enough to use the extra four bytes of server space, I'm clearly out of my element here. Where are the protective [[User talk:Bishzilla|monster]]s when you need help? [[User:Franamax|Franamax]] ([[User talk:Franamax|talk]]) 01:35, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
280289 +++$+++ Bigtimepeace +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280283 +++$+++ 280288 +++$+++ 2009-06-14 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.244990760E09 +++$+++ You ''know'' about the extra four bytes in em-dashes? Clearly someone else with meta-humor clearance has been leaking information. -- +++$+++ ::::::You ''know'' about the extra four bytes in em-dashes? Clearly someone else with meta-humor clearance has been leaking information. --[[User:Bigtimepeace|Bigtimepeace]] <small>| [[User_talk:Bigtimepeace|talk]] |  [[Special:Contributions/Bigtimepeace|contribs]]</small> 07:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
280290 +++$+++ Franamax +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280283 +++$+++ 280289 +++$+++ 2009-06-14 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.245003000E09 +++$+++ Oh there's some serious leakage here, but it sure ain't information...  +++$+++ :::::::Oh there's some serious leakage here, but it sure ain't information... [[User:Franamax|Franamax]] ([[User talk:Franamax|talk]]) 11:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

18142 +++$+++ DFS454 +++$+++ Fat pig73 +++$+++ 18142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-10 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.234316880E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}<\/code> to '''the top of [[:Garden Company Limited|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or \"db\" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:Garden Company Limited|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the article or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-inc-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom -->  +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Garden Company Limited|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:Garden Company Limited|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that they  [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the article or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-inc-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:DFS454|DFS454]] ([[User talk:DFS454|talk]]) 17:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
18143 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ Fat pig73 +++$+++ 18142 +++$+++ 18142 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.234320180E09 +++$+++ Please note: I've declined that speedy for the time being, but in the current shape the article would almost certainly be deleted in a deletion discussion.  When writing new articles, make a point of [[WP:CITE|citing]] [[WP:RS|reliable, third party sources]] such as books, newspapers or magazines to [[WP:N|establish notability]].  Without these, deletion is very likely.  With a few newspaper articles about a company cited, you're unlikely to be hassled about this. Cheers,  +++$+++ *Please note: I've declined that speedy for the time being, but in the current shape the article would almost certainly be deleted in a deletion discussion.  When writing new articles, make a point of [[WP:CITE|citing]] [[WP:RS|reliable, third party sources]] such as books, newspapers or magazines to [[WP:N|establish notability]].  Without these, deletion is very likely.  With a few newspaper articles about a company cited, you're unlikely to be hassled about this. Cheers, [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 18:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

542433 +++$+++ Roger Davies +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542433 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-05 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.207400820E09 +++$+++ Done, I think. See [[WP:MHL#Requests for graphics]]. -- +++$+++ Done, I think. See [[WP:MHL#Requests for graphics]]. --[[User:Roger Davies|<font color="maroon">'''R<small>OGER</small>&nbsp;D<small>AVIES'''</small></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 06:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
542434 +++$+++ Roger Davies +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542433 +++$+++ 542433 +++$+++ 2008-04-06 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.207485180E09 +++$+++ Done, with transparent background. :) -- +++$+++ :Done, with transparent background. :) --[[User:Roger Davies|<font color="maroon">'''R<small>OGER</small>&nbsp;D<small>AVIES'''</small></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 05:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

571003 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571003 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-15 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.160908380E09 +++$+++ Hey DFR.  Since the talk page for WikiWar is getting somewhat confusing, I'm gonna ask you directly-do you join the WikiArmy or start your own nation?  I need to know to organize this correctly.  Thanks.  <font color=\"orange\">[[User:DoomsDay349|Dooms]]<\/font><font color=\"purple\">[[User talk:DoomsDay349|Day34]]<\/font><font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ Hey DFR.  Since the talk page for WikiWar is getting somewhat confusing, I'm gonna ask you directly-do you join the WikiArmy or start your own nation?  I need to know to organize this correctly.  Thanks.  <font color="orange">[[User:DoomsDay349|Dooms]]</font><font color="purple">[[User talk:DoomsDay349|Day34]]</font><font color="green">[[User:DoomsDay349/Esperanza|9]]</font> 03:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
571004 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571003 +++$+++ 571003 +++$+++ 2006-10-15 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.160908560E09 +++$+++ More than confusing!  I think I'll start my own Nation, supplemented by The Archers Incompitent. It will be called The Brotherhood of Cod <small> Name is subject to change. <\/small>. I'll start work on an Orbital Laser Cannon or a System like the Fractional Orbital Bombardment System ([[FOBS]]). All I have to do this is a slice of lemon and a ball-point pen. '''STATUS''': Passive Agressive. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :More than confusing!  I think I'll start my own Nation, supplemented by The Archers Incompitent. It will be called The Brotherhood of Cod <small> Name is subject to change. </small>. I'll start work on an Orbital Laser Cannon or a System like the Fractional Orbital Bombardment System ([[FOBS]]). All I have to do this is a slice of lemon and a ball-point pen. '''STATUS''': Passive Agressive. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 03:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

542436 +++$+++ F9T +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-10 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.207886640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking the helm for me, is it still possible to be a judge? \/\/  +++$+++ Thanks for taking the helm for me, is it still possible to be a judge? // [[User:F9T|<font color="Red" face="Trebuchet MS">Fi]]<font color="lightsteelblue">[[User talk:F9T|<font color="blue" face="Trebuchet MS">nns]]</font></font> 21:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
542437 +++$+++ Finns +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542436 +++$+++ 542436 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.207924320E09 +++$+++ Thanks Dreamy! \/\/  +++$+++ :Thanks Dreamy! // [[User:Finns|<font color="Red" face="Trebuchet MS">Fi]]<font color="lightsteelblue">[[User talk:Finns|<font color="blue" face="Trebuchet MS">nns]]</font></font> 07:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
542438 +++$+++ Finns +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542436 +++$+++ 542437 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.207924500E09 +++$+++ Oh, and could I also be sneaky and take one of the places that have been removed - seeing as you haven't done the full points this season. \/\/  +++$+++ ::Oh, and could I also be sneaky and take one of the places that have been removed - seeing as you haven't done the full points this season. // [[User:Finns|<font color="Red" face="Trebuchet MS">Fi]]<font color="lightsteelblue">[[User talk:Finns|<font color="blue" face="Trebuchet MS">nns]]</font></font> 07:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
542439 +++$+++ Finns +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542436 +++$+++ 542438 +++$+++ 2008-04-11 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.207956420E09 +++$+++ OK then, over to you Dreamafter! \/\/  +++$+++ :::OK then, over to you Dreamafter! // [[User:Finns|<font color="Red" face="Trebuchet MS">Fi]]<font color="lightsteelblue">[[User talk:Finns|<font color="blue" face="Trebuchet MS">nns]]</font></font> 16:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

280293 +++$+++ Llywrch +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-15 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.245116460E09 +++$+++ A sock puppet, a meat puppet and Jimbo walk into a bar. The rabbi turns to the priest and says to him, \"They'll let anybody in here nowadays.\" The priest replies, \"I need a citation for that.\" --  +++$+++ A sock puppet, a meat puppet and Jimbo walk into a bar. The rabbi turns to the priest and says to him, "They'll let anybody in here nowadays." The priest replies, "I need a citation for that." -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] ([[User talk:Llywrch|talk]]) 18:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
280294 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280293 +++$+++ 280293 +++$+++ 2009-06-15 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.245117540E09 +++$+++ ;-) It's never too late for an [[Honorable Mention]].  +++$+++ : ;-) It's never too late for an [[Honorable Mention]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

280295 +++$+++ Franamax +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-16 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.245189360E09 +++$+++ I've actually been considering uspacing this whole shebang with an eye to donating it to the project as a humour page. It's relatively fertile ground. Has anyone asked Jimbo for his contest entry?  +++$+++ I've actually been considering uspacing this whole shebang with an eye to donating it to the project as a humour page. It's relatively fertile ground. Has anyone asked Jimbo for his contest entry? [[User:Franamax|Franamax]] ([[User talk:Franamax|talk]]) 14:56, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
280296 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280295 +++$+++ 280295 +++$+++ 2009-06-16 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.245194280E09 +++$+++ As far as I know Jimbo knows nothing about this contest (nor do the sock and meat puppets). Feel free to ask him (or them) for entries.  +++$+++ :As far as I know Jimbo knows nothing about this contest (nor do the sock and meat puppets). Feel free to ask him (or them) for entries. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

280297 +++$+++ AGK +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-27 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.246158120E09 +++$+++ If you're interested in proofing the tallies, numbering, and such for the final decision of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/A Man In Black|''A Man In Black'' case]], I've written a draft at  +++$+++ If you're interested in proofing the tallies, numbering, and such for the final decision of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/A Man In Black|''A Man In Black'' case]], I've written a draft at [[User:AGK/C]]. You're free to correct, update, or comment on that draft at your leisure. Regards, [[User talk:AGK|AGK]] 20:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
280298 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280297 +++$+++ 280297 +++$+++ 2009-06-27 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.246158540E09 +++$+++ Looks good to me.  +++$+++ :Looks good to me. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
280299 +++$+++ AGK +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280297 +++$+++ 280298 +++$+++ 2009-06-27 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.246158660E09 +++$+++ Excellent. Thank you.  +++$+++ :: Excellent. Thank you. [[User talk:AGK|AGK]] 20:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

483623 +++$+++ Butseriouslyfolks +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483623 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-22 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.193110860E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=166362631&oldid=166361044 LMFAO!] --'''<span style=\"background:Black;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=166362631&oldid=166361044 LMFAO!] --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Bsf|<font color="White">But</font>]]|[[User talk:Bsf|<font color="White">seriously</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Butseriouslyfolks|<font color="White">folks</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 20:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
483624 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483623 +++$+++ 483623 +++$+++ 2007-10-22 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.193111280E09 +++$+++ Couldn't resist.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Couldn't resist.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 20:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

609986 +++$+++ Scarian +++$+++ The Haunted Angel +++$+++ 609986 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-13 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.195023720E09 +++$+++ He's been in trouble for 3RR before... watch this one closely [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Cradle_of_Filth&diff=next&oldid=171307131].  +++$+++ He's been in trouble for 3RR before... watch this one closely [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cradle_of_Filth&diff=next&oldid=171307131]. [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scar</font><font color="black" face="tahoma">ian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 23:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
609987 +++$+++  +++$+++ The Haunted Angel +++$+++ 609986 +++$+++ 609986 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.195024560E09 +++$+++ Alright, thanks for the heads-up. \u2248  +++$+++ :Alright, thanks for the heads-up. ≈ [[User: The Haunted Angel|<b><font color="#8000FF">The Haunted Angel</font></b>]] <small><u>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/The Haunted Angel 2|Review Me!]]</u></small> 23:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
609988 +++$+++ Navnløs +++$+++ The Haunted Angel +++$+++ 609986 +++$+++ 609987 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.195025160E09 +++$+++ OMG, only because Scarian reported me...  I'm no vandal, jeez, I just happen to like line breaks over comma breaks for genres in the muci infobox.  Now, please look at the convo on the CoF page to see my explanation of why CoF is [[dark metal]].  +++$+++ ::OMG, only because Scarian reported me...  I'm no vandal, jeez, I just happen to like line breaks over comma breaks for genres in the muci infobox.  Now, please look at the convo on the CoF page to see my explanation of why CoF is [[dark metal]]. [[User:Navnløs|Navnløs]] 23:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

280301 +++$+++  +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-23 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.248405240E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:bmuth]] 20:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
280302 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280301 +++$+++ 280301 +++$+++ 2009-07-24 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.248420120E09 +++$+++ Your edit simply repeated information that was already included in the \"References\" section (not the \"Bibliography\" section). That's why I said it was redundant. I don't know what you mean by \"Is a link considered sufficient in Wikipedia?\" See [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] for more information, particularly the section [[Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Shortened footnotes|\"Shortened footnotes\"]], which is the citation style  used (primarily) by that article. However as the notice in the article says the article is inconsistent in it's citation style, for example it also uses [[Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Parenthetical referencing|\"Parenthetical referencing\"]]. It would be better if the article used one style only (in this case I think \"Shortened footnotes\" style would be best).  +++$+++ :Your edit simply repeated information that was already included in the "References" section (not the "Bibliography" section). That's why I said it was redundant. I don't know what you mean by "Is a link considered sufficient in Wikipedia?" See [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] for more information, particularly the section [[Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Shortened footnotes|"Shortened footnotes"]], which is the citation style  used (primarily) by that article. However as the notice in the article says the article is inconsistent in it's citation style, for example it also uses [[Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Parenthetical referencing|"Parenthetical referencing"]]. It would be better if the article used one style only (in this case I think "Shortened footnotes" style would be best). [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:22, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
280303 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280301 +++$+++ 280301 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.249935180E09 +++$+++ Any administrator can access a copy of deleted text, and might if asked provide you with a copy of the text. Asking the admin who deleted the page might work, since they would be familiar with why the page was deleted.  +++$+++ :Any administrator can access a copy of deleted text, and might if asked provide you with a copy of the text. Asking the admin who deleted the page might work, since they would be familiar with why the page was deleted. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
280304 +++$+++ Tkech +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280301 +++$+++ 280303 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.250808360E09 +++$+++ Your information helped me find someone who gave me an archive. Thanks for your help!  +++$+++ ::Your information helped me find someone who gave me an archive. Thanks for your help! [[User:Tkech|Tkech]] ([[User talk:Tkech|talk]]) 15:46, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
280305 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280301 +++$+++ 280301 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.250813940E09 +++$+++ Glad I could help.  +++$+++ :Glad I could help. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:19, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

550534 +++$+++ Lord Bob +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-10 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.123677780E09 +++$+++ Hey. Any reason you reverted my thoughts on the sockpuppets in [[Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion\/SimCentral]]? I thought I'd raised a good point, but I didn't just want to go re-adding it for the simple reason that that would make me a jerk. I'd still like to hear what you thought the problem was so I don't do it again, though.  +++$+++ Hey. Any reason you reverted my thoughts on the sockpuppets in [[Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/SimCentral]]? I thought I'd raised a good point, but I didn't just want to go re-adding it for the simple reason that that would make me a jerk. I'd still like to hear what you thought the problem was so I don't do it again, though. [[User:Lord Bob|Lord Bob]] 05:43, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
550535 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550534 +++$+++ 550534 +++$+++ 2005-08-10 07:19:00 +++$+++ 1.123683540E09 +++$+++ Sorry, that was an accident combined with a genuine revert. I've fixed my mistake, and replied on your talk page. - +++$+++ :Sorry, that was an accident combined with a genuine revert. I've fixed my mistake, and replied on your talk page. -[[User:Splash|Splash]] 07:19, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
550536 +++$+++ Lord Bob +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550534 +++$+++ 550535 +++$+++ 2005-08-10 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.123683960E09 +++$+++ That would do it! Thanks for the quick reply.  +++$+++ ::That would do it! Thanks for the quick reply. [[User:Lord Bob|Lord Bob]] 07:26, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

542447 +++$+++ Redmarkviolinist +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542447 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-30 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.209555120E09 +++$+++ You have been accused of [[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|sockpuppetry]]. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Dreamafter]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry\/Notes for the suspect|notes for the suspect]] before editing the evidence page. <font color=\"green\" face=\"Papyrus\">[[User:Redmarkviolinist|\u1e5c\u03ad\u0111\u1e43\u03ac\u044f\u0137v\u044e\u0128\u0457\u03ae\u012b\u1e63\u0162]]<\/font> <sup> [[User talk:Redmarkviolinist|Drop me a line]]<\/sup> +++$+++ You have been accused of [[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|sockpuppetry]]. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dreamafter]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect|notes for the suspect]] before editing the evidence page. <font color="green" face="Papyrus">[[User:Redmarkviolinist|ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ]]</font> <sup> [[User talk:Redmarkviolinist|Drop me a line]]</sup>[[User:Redmarkviolinist/Awards|§]] 04:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
542448 +++$+++ Redmarkviolinist +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542447 +++$+++ 542447 +++$+++ 2008-05-02 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.209720300E09 +++$+++ I have commented. Check the page. <font color=\"red\" face=\"Papyrus\">[[User:Redmarkviolinist|\u1e5c\u03ad\u0111<\/font><font color=\"green\" face=\"Papyrus\">\u1e43\u03ac\u044f\u0137v\u044e\u0128\u0457\u03ae\u012b\u1e63\u0162]]<\/font> <sup> [[User talk:Redmarkviolinist|Drop me a line]]<\/sup> +++$+++ :I have commented. Check the page. <font color="red" face="Papyrus">[[User:Redmarkviolinist|Ṝέđ</font><font color="green" face="Papyrus">ṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ]]</font> <sup> [[User talk:Redmarkviolinist|Drop me a line]]</sup>[[User:Redmarkviolinist/Articles|<big>§</big>]] 02:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

280306 +++$+++ Yannismarou +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280306 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-26 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.251311280E09 +++$+++ I am very happy that Attalus kept his star. I am sorry I did not help more to address the remaining reviewers's concerns, but a heavy program, vacations and a broken bone have been keeping me away! I hope that I'll have the chance to cooperate again with you some time in Wikipedia (in FAC, FAR or somewhere else!), because you are one of the gentlest guys around, and it is always a pleasure for any user to work with you. Cheers!-- +++$+++ I am very happy that Attalus kept his star. I am sorry I did not help more to address the remaining reviewers's concerns, but a heavy program, vacations and a broken bone have been keeping me away! I hope that I'll have the chance to cooperate again with you some time in Wikipedia (in FAC, FAR or somewhere else!), because you are one of the gentlest guys around, and it is always a pleasure for any user to work with you. Cheers!--[[User:Yannismarou|Yannismarou]] ([[User talk:Yannismarou|talk]]) 11:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
280307 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280306 +++$+++ 280306 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.251313620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your kind words. And thanks again (I hope you saw my last comment on that review) for your very valuable work on the article, in particular locating all those secondary sources. I am not so concerned with the star, but I am glad that we were able to improve the article somewhat. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thanks for your kind words. And thanks again (I hope you saw my last comment on that review) for your very valuable work on the article, in particular locating all those secondary sources. I am not so concerned with the star, but I am glad that we were able to improve the article somewhat. Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 12:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

280309 +++$+++ Dicklyon +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280309 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-20 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.256087640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for patching up the linkage in [[logarithm]], but I think we shouldn't really be including this statement and linking to the unsourced bit in [[common logarithm]], at least until we can get some support for it.  So I took out the sentence, including your link.   +++$+++ Thanks for patching up the linkage in [[logarithm]], but I think we shouldn't really be including this statement and linking to the unsourced bit in [[common logarithm]], at least until we can get some support for it.  So I took out the sentence, including your link.  [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 18:14, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
280310 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280309 +++$+++ 280309 +++$+++ 2009-10-20 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.256087880E09 +++$+++ That's fine with me.  +++$+++ :That's fine with me. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:18, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

280311 +++$+++ Dchmelik +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280311 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-20 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.256092380E09 +++$+++ I just want to point out that after your edit of [[Synergetics coordinates]] it actually does not have an algabraic (written) example of the coordinates such as '(x,y,....)'-- +++$+++ I just want to point out that after your edit of [[Synergetics coordinates]] it actually does not have an algabraic (written) example of the coordinates such as '(x,y,....)'--[[User:Dchmelik|Dchmelik]] ([[User talk:Dchmelik|talk]]) 19:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
280312 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280311 +++$+++ 280311 +++$+++ 2009-10-20 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.256094480E09 +++$+++ Not sure what you are talking about exactly. But I think you might be confusing my edits with the edits made by [[user:Cjnelson9|Cjnelson9]]. My only edit to the article was to remove  the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] template added by the IP 74.98.46.147 because I felt that in order for this article to be deleted it ought to go through a [[WP:AFD|full deletion discussion]] first.  +++$+++ :Not sure what you are talking about exactly. But I think you might be confusing my edits with the edits made by [[user:Cjnelson9|Cjnelson9]]. My only edit to the article was to remove  the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] template added by the IP 74.98.46.147 because I felt that in order for this article to be deleted it ought to go through a [[WP:AFD|full deletion discussion]] first. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:08, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

542456 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542456 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-30 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.212137220E09 +++$+++ Trust me, if you'd seen the (since-deleted) material he posted, you'd completely agree with my wording.  +++$+++ Trust me, if you'd seen the (since-deleted) material he posted, you'd completely agree with my wording. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 01:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
542457 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542456 +++$+++ 542456 +++$+++ 2008-05-30 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.212137880E09 +++$+++ Actually, I believe I was thinking of another problem user. Jonferris's deleted contribs were crap, yes, but I concede that I may have been overly harsh towards him. That said, he has started an RfA for himself - with an edit history of 5. Not a good sign.  +++$+++ :Actually, I believe I was thinking of another problem user. Jonferris's deleted contribs were crap, yes, but I concede that I may have been overly harsh towards him. That said, he has started an RfA for himself - with an edit history of 5. Not a good sign. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 01:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
542458 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542456 +++$+++ 542457 +++$+++ 2008-05-30 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.212138180E09 +++$+++ Oh, and for the record, we damn well ''can'' kick people out of the free, anyone-can-edit encyclopedia, and we do - typically for very good reasons. As for the material on Cronenworth - it's just a little bit of a bio blurb, with no notability asserted, and submitted by the man's son. \"SFC Cronenworth served in Company\/Regiment, he was wounded in the hand and arm on (date), he was wounded a year later also, he got the Silver Star and the Purple Heart.\" To put it bluntly, what else is there? We don't list people ''just because they got the Silver Star and Purple Heart''. There has to be something more.  +++$+++ ::Oh, and for the record, we damn well ''can'' kick people out of the free, anyone-can-edit encyclopedia, and we do - typically for very good reasons. As for the material on Cronenworth - it's just a little bit of a bio blurb, with no notability asserted, and submitted by the man's son. "SFC Cronenworth served in Company/Regiment, he was wounded in the hand and arm on (date), he was wounded a year later also, he got the Silver Star and the Purple Heart." To put it bluntly, what else is there? We don't list people ''just because they got the Silver Star and Purple Heart''. There has to be something more. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 02:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

280313 +++$+++ CBM +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280313 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-21 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.256192580E09 +++$+++ Did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mathematical_logic&diff=next&oldid=321287573#History this edit] make any visual difference in the article? I thought that whitespace on the ends of headings is ignored. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>( +++$+++ Did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mathematical_logic&diff=next&oldid=321287573#History this edit] make any visual difference in the article? I thought that whitespace on the ends of headings is ignored. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 23:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
280314 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280313 +++$+++ 280313 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.256194980E09 +++$+++ No, no difference. I think I ran across [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mathematical_logic&diff=next&oldid=321250599 this edit], first and reverted without noticing the net effect of that IP's string of edits, and hence my revert.  +++$+++ :No, no difference. I think I ran across [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mathematical_logic&diff=next&oldid=321250599 this edit], first and reverted without noticing the net effect of that IP's string of edits, and hence my revert. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 00:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

280315 +++$+++ Jim.belk +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280315 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-22 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.256209020E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ Cheers, [[User:Jim.belk|Jim]] ([[User talk:Jim.belk|talk]]) 03:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
280316 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280315 +++$+++ 280315 +++$+++ 2009-10-22 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.256253540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
280317 +++$+++ Jim.belk +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280315 +++$+++ 280316 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.256308740E09 +++$+++ By the way, if Finell doesn't respond to your post on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics]], you may want to try moving the discussion to [[Talk:Pi]].  I hardly see how the venue for the discussion matters, but this seems to be something of a sticking point for him, and giving in on this issue might make the rest of the discussion go more smoothly.  +++$+++ ::By the way, if Finell doesn't respond to your post on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics]], you may want to try moving the discussion to [[Talk:Pi]].  I hardly see how the venue for the discussion matters, but this seems to be something of a sticking point for him, and giving in on this issue might make the rest of the discussion go more smoothly. [[User:Jim.belk|Jim]] ([[User talk:Jim.belk|talk]]) 07:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
280318 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280315 +++$+++ 280315 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.256331120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:52, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

542460 +++$+++ Gears of War +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-01 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.212387900E09 +++$+++ I want to join the wikicup but the instructions are not very helpful and kinda confusing, please lead me to the correct page so I can sign up. +++$+++ I want to join the wikicup but the instructions are not very helpful and kinda confusing, please lead me to the correct page so I can sign up.[[User:Gears of War|<font face="Times New Roman" size="2.0" color="red">'''Gears'''</font>]] [[User talk:Gears of War|<font face="Times New Roman" size="2.0" color="black">'''Of War'''</font>]] 23:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
542461 +++$+++ Caribbean H.Q. +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542460 +++$+++ 542460 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.212388140E09 +++$+++ Hey, I was wondering, [[Puerto Rican Amazon]] passed GAN in the recess between the cup's first and second rounds, since it wasn't included in the score of the first round then will it be summed to that of the second one? -  +++$+++ :Hey, I was wondering, [[Puerto Rican Amazon]] passed GAN in the recess between the cup's first and second rounds, since it wasn't included in the score of the first round then will it be summed to that of the second one? - [[User:Caribbean H.Q.|<b><font color="#0000DD"><font color="#0066FF">Ca<font color="#0099FF">ri<font color="#00CCFF">bb<font color="#00EEFF">e</font>a</font></font>n</font>~</font><font color="#FF3333">H.</font><font color="#FFCC00">Q.</font></b>]] 23:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
542462 +++$+++ Gears of War +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542460 +++$+++ 542461 +++$+++ 2008-06-02 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.212397860E09 +++$+++ Hello? Are you like, ignoring me? +++$+++ ::Hello? Are you like, ignoring me?[[User:Gears of War|<font face="Times New Roman" size="2.0" color="red">'''Gears'''</font>]] [[User talk:Gears of War|<font face="Times New Roman" size="2.0" color="black">'''Of War'''</font>]] 02:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

280319 +++$+++  +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280319 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-31 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.256989920E09 +++$+++ Hi. I saw that u added links in the Dido disambiguation page. The guidelines show that we only link one item per line. Details are over at [[MOS:DAB]]. That whole area of Wikipedia is an interesting place to work. Just thought i'd let u know. Dawnseeker2000 04:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ Hi. I saw that u added links in the Dido disambiguation page. The guidelines show that we only link one item per line. Details are over at [[MOS:DAB]]. That whole area of Wikipedia is an interesting place to work. Just thought i'd let u know. Dawnseeker2000 04:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
280320 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280319 +++$+++ 280319 +++$+++ 2009-10-31 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.257013320E09 +++$+++ Thanks. News to me.  +++$+++ :Thanks. News to me. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 11:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

574488 +++$+++ Anomo +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 574488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-01 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.162407180E09 +++$+++ See about the suing for libel part.   +++$+++ See about the suing for libel part.  [[User:Anomo|Anomo]] 10:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
574489 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 574488 +++$+++ 574488 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.162411020E09 +++$+++ Yeah...I have mentioned that I don't care what that website has on me there...so long as they keep it out of here. The little boys have to have some playground.-- +++$+++ :Yeah...I have mentioned that I don't care what that website has on me there...so long as they keep it out of here. The little boys have to have some playground.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 11:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

280322 +++$+++ Gregbard +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280322 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-15 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.258284420E09 +++$+++ Please do not remove the link to [[concept]] in the article set. There are very few instances where linking \"concept\" is completely appropriate, and this is obviously one of them. Please also see [[User:Gregbard\/Concepts and theories]]. Be well.  +++$+++ Please do not remove the link to [[concept]] in the article set. There are very few instances where linking "concept" is completely appropriate, and this is obviously one of them. Please also see [[User:Gregbard/Concepts and theories]]. Be well. [[User:Gregbard|Pontiff Greg Bard]] ([[User talk:Gregbard|talk]]) 03:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
280323 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280322 +++$+++ 280322 +++$+++ 2009-11-15 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.258285680E09 +++$+++ I won't argue over it.  +++$+++ :I won't argue over it. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:48, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
280324 +++$+++ Gregbard +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280322 +++$+++ 280323 +++$+++ 2009-11-15 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.258286520E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your diplomacy. One of my general tasks on WP is to try to incorporate the fundamentals into logic articles. Unfortunately I find that many mathematicians see this as terrible and irrelevant and delete my work. Please be open-minded that quite a few of these articles in the logic department are not ruined by explicating their relation to their metalogical, philosophical, fundamentals, foundations, etcetera. I would be fine with removing this type of thing from other articles which are father removed. \"Set\" however is very very fundamental. If someone wants to remove that kind of thing from an article like [[Grzegorczyk_hierarchy]] which is several times removed from any philosophical issues and where there really is no reason, that's makes complete sense. But for things like set and theorem I think people need to be more open-minded. Be well,  +++$+++ ::I appreciate your diplomacy. One of my general tasks on WP is to try to incorporate the fundamentals into logic articles. Unfortunately I find that many mathematicians see this as terrible and irrelevant and delete my work. Please be open-minded that quite a few of these articles in the logic department are not ruined by explicating their relation to their metalogical, philosophical, fundamentals, foundations, etcetera. I would be fine with removing this type of thing from other articles which are father removed. "Set" however is very very fundamental. If someone wants to remove that kind of thing from an article like [[Grzegorczyk_hierarchy]] which is several times removed from any philosophical issues and where there really is no reason, that's makes complete sense. But for things like set and theorem I think people need to be more open-minded. Be well, [[User:Gregbard|Pontiff Greg Bard]] ([[User talk:Gregbard|talk]]) 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

280327 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280327 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-10 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.260493560E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Eastern_European_mailing_list\/Proposed_decision#Question_to_arbs:_new_FoF_on_Disruption_-_alternative_or_not.3F|FYI - question]]. --<sub><span style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern_European_mailing_list/Proposed_decision#Question_to_arbs:_new_FoF_on_Disruption_-_alternative_or_not.3F|FYI - question]]. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 17:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
280328 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280327 +++$+++ 280327 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.260499980E09 +++$+++ I've replied there.  +++$+++ :I've replied there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:53, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

280330 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-01 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.262347740E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification&diff=prev&oldid=335232144 This edit] removed several statements, including my own. I assume it was unintentional, but I wasn't sure the best way to go about fixing it, so thought I'd ask you. Happy New Year, anyhow. :) ''' +++$+++ Hi Paul. [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification&diff=prev&oldid=335232144 This edit] removed several statements, including my own. I assume it was unintentional, but I wasn't sure the best way to go about fixing it, so thought I'd ask you. Happy New Year, anyhow. :) '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 04:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
280331 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280330 +++$+++ 280330 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.262347800E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that I'll look into it (perhaps it was an ec).  +++$+++ :Sorry about that I'll look into it (perhaps it was an ec). [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
280332 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280330 +++$+++ 280331 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.262347920E09 +++$+++ Actually, never mind - I think I fixed it, though probably best if you double-check it as well to make sure I didn't mess it up. ''' +++$+++ ::Actually, never mind - I think I fixed it, though probably best if you double-check it as well to make sure I didn't mess it up. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 04:12, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
280333 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280330 +++$+++ 280332 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.262348460E09 +++$+++ I've added back another statement that went missing. I think everything is fixed now, but would welcome a double check. Thanks for looking after me.  +++$+++ :::I've added back another statement that went missing. I think everything is fixed now, but would welcome a double check. Thanks for looking after me. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:21, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
280334 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280330 +++$+++ 280330 +++$+++ 2010-01-03 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.262522760E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Best wishes to you as well.  +++$+++ :Thanks! Best wishes to you as well. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

542477 +++$+++ Bebestbe +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-16 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.213673340E09 +++$+++ Hi Dreamafter. With the year almost up, we're making an effort to reduce the number of listings at [[Wikipedia:Articles requested for more than a year]]. You've been a big help in the past with that project page and I am hoping that you can knock out a few to contribute to the effort. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Dreamafter. With the year almost up, we're making an effort to reduce the number of listings at [[Wikipedia:Articles requested for more than a year]]. You've been a big help in the past with that project page and I am hoping that you can knock out a few to contribute to the effort. Thanks. [[User:Bebestbe|Bebestbe]] ([[User talk:Bebestbe|talk]]) 20:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
542478 +++$+++ Calvin 1998 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542477 +++$+++ 542477 +++$+++ 2008-06-16 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.213677180E09 +++$+++ Dreamafter is on an indefinite wikibreak...  +++$+++ : Dreamafter is on an indefinite wikibreak... [[User:Calvin 1998|Calvin 1998]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Calvin 1998|t]]-[[Special:Contributions/Calvin 1998|c]])</sup> 21:33, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

280335 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280335 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-05 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.262740260E09 +++$+++ Paul, you may be interested in the following discussion, [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Computational complexity theory as part of \"mathematics\"]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ Paul, you may be interested in the following discussion, [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Computational complexity theory as part of "mathematics"]]. Thanks. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 17:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
280336 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280335 +++$+++ 280335 +++$+++ 2010-01-05 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.262750760E09 +++$+++ Hi Oleg. I took a look, but I'm afraid I can't think of anything useful to say at the moment.  +++$+++ :Hi Oleg. I took a look, but I'm afraid I can't think of anything useful to say at the moment. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
280337 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280335 +++$+++ 280336 +++$+++ 2010-01-05 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.262752500E09 +++$+++ No problem. I think there are plenty of opinions already.  +++$+++ :: No problem. I think there are plenty of opinions already. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 20:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

280338 +++$+++ Hersfold +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280338 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-08 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.263006540E09 +++$+++ Thanks, forgot about that. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue\">Hers<\/em><em style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold\">fold<\/em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold\/t|t]]\/ +++$+++ Thanks, forgot about that. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold</em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold/t|t]]/[[User:Hersfold/a|a]]/[[Special:Contributions/Hersfold|c]])</sup> 19:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
280339 +++$+++ Doug Coldwell +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280338 +++$+++ 280338 +++$+++ 2010-01-09 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.263098820E09 +++$+++ Thanks.-- +++$+++ :Thanks.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Coldwell|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 20:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
280340 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280338 +++$+++ 280339 +++$+++ 2010-01-09 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.263100440E09 +++$+++ Sorry but I don't think I have anything useful to say there.  +++$+++ ::Sorry but I don't think I have anything useful to say there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

571011 +++$+++ ReverendG +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-17 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.161144660E09 +++$+++ Thank you for this dubious honour. I will treasure it always and bear it with pride.  +++$+++ Thank you for this dubious honour. I will treasure it always and bear it with pride. [[User:ReverendG|ReverendG]] 21:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
571012 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571011 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.161268500E09 +++$+++ I got the Dfrg.msc biscuit award.  This is the greatest day of my life.   '''' +++$+++ :::I got the Dfrg.msc biscuit award.  This is the greatest day of my life.   ''''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 07:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
571013 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571011 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.161269100E09 +++$+++ Marking completed! I hope this serves as some constructive critisisim, I'll mark you again in perhaps a month to see improvement. Good to see that you are editing well now and that we can communicate efficently - but you are needed. Click on my ''Ars Exelenus'' text to go to the front.  [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::: Marking completed! I hope this serves as some constructive critisisim, I'll mark you again in perhaps a month to see improvement. Good to see that you are editing well now and that we can communicate efficently - but you are needed. Click on my ''Ars Exelenus'' text to go to the front.  [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 07:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
571014 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571011 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.161272280E09 +++$+++ Can you get rid of it now?  '''' +++$+++ :::::Can you get rid of it now?  ''''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 08:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
571015 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571011 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.161324840E09 +++$+++ Get rid of what? [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::::::Get rid of what? [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 23:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
571016 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571011 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-22 08:02:00 +++$+++ 1.161529320E09 +++$+++ Just a reminder to bring my merchandise tomorrow.  ''' +++$+++ ::::::Just a reminder to bring my merchandise tomorrow.  '''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 08:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
571017 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571011 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-22 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.161534900E09 +++$+++ You insult me, What do you think I am.... human? [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::::::: You insult me, What do you think I am.... human? [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 09:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
571018 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571011 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-22 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.161537060E09 +++$+++ Well no......   ''' +++$+++ :::::::: Well no......   '''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 10:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

532589 +++$+++ Klemen Kocjancic +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-24 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.151205840E09 +++$+++ \u010ce lahko prosim na [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser\/CheckPage]] prestavi\u0161 KocjoBota med bote; nekdo ga je vrgel med navadne uporabnik. HvN. Lp, -- +++$+++ Če lahko prosim na [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage]] prestaviš KocjoBota med bote; nekdo ga je vrgel med navadne uporabnik. HvN. Lp, --[[User:Klemen Kocjancic|Klemen Kocjancic]] 20:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
532590 +++$+++ Klemen Kocjancic +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532589 +++$+++ 532589 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.152125400E09 +++$+++ Hvala ti! LP, -- +++$+++ :Hvala ti! LP, --[[User:Klemen Kocjancic|Klemen Kocjancic]] 11:50, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
532591 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532589 +++$+++ 532590 +++$+++ 2006-07-05 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.152125820E09 +++$+++ Malenkost :-) LP --'''[[User:tone|Ton]] +++$+++ :: Malenkost :-) LP --'''[[User:tone|Ton]][[User:Tone/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]''' 11:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

280341 +++$+++ Roger Pearse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-19 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.263959220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your note.  I've written an explanation of what I reverted and why on the talk page for the article.  By all means, let's reach consensus!  +++$+++ Thanks for your note.  I've written an explanation of what I reverted and why on the talk page for the article.  By all means, let's reach consensus! [[User:Roger Pearse|Roger Pearse]] ([[User talk:Roger Pearse|talk]]) 19:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
280342 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280341 +++$+++ 280341 +++$+++ 2010-01-19 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.263959400E09 +++$+++ Yes I've just seen it, and will respond there. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Yes I've just seen it, and will respond there. Thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
280343 +++$+++ Roger Pearse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280341 +++$+++ 280342 +++$+++ 2010-01-19 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.263959520E09 +++$+++ I've just looked through your copyedits and accepted most of them -- thanks for picking this stuff up.  The stuff that I was really getting rid of was the \"Mithras BC stuff\" which was added by someone else, but somewhat hard to prune out by itself!  +++$+++ ::I've just looked through your copyedits and accepted most of them -- thanks for picking this stuff up.  The stuff that I was really getting rid of was the "Mithras BC stuff" which was added by someone else, but somewhat hard to prune out by itself! [[User:Roger Pearse|Roger Pearse]] ([[User talk:Roger Pearse|talk]]) 19:52, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
280344 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280341 +++$+++ 280343 +++$+++ 2010-01-19 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.263960240E09 +++$+++ There were several other changes I made that you have not restored (probably you missed many as they are hard to see in a diff). Can you tell me which if any of my edits you object to? Thanks. It would be best if we continue this discussion on the article talk page.  +++$+++ :::There were several other changes I made that you have not restored (probably you missed many as they are hard to see in a diff). Can you tell me which if any of my edits you object to? Thanks. It would be best if we continue this discussion on the article talk page. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
280345 +++$+++ Roger Pearse +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280341 +++$+++ 280344 +++$+++ 2010-01-19 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.263960960E09 +++$+++ Oh dear!  I preferred to leave the AD stuff as profuse as it was.  But the other edits all seemed fine.  In fact I reinserted them all, or thought I had.  What did I miss?  +++$+++ ::::Oh dear!  I preferred to leave the AD stuff as profuse as it was.  But the other edits all seemed fine.  In fact I reinserted them all, or thought I had.  What did I miss? [[User:Roger Pearse|Roger Pearse]] ([[User talk:Roger Pearse|talk]]) 20:16, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
280346 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280341 +++$+++ 280345 +++$+++ 2010-01-19 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.263961140E09 +++$+++ Don't fret. See my comment [[Talk:Mithraic_Mysteries#Last_few_edits|here]].  +++$+++ :::::Don't fret. See my comment [[Talk:Mithraic_Mysteries#Last_few_edits|here]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:19, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

542489 +++$+++ IMatthew +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542489 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-17 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.221704880E09 +++$+++ Speaking of the WikiCup. I was wondering if there was an open spot on \"The Team.\" I'd love to fill that spot, if it exists. ;) <span style=\"font-family: tahoma\">''' +++$+++ Speaking of the WikiCup. I was wondering if there was an open spot on "The Team." I'd love to fill that spot, if it exists. ;) <span style="font-family: tahoma">'''[[User:iMatthew|<span style="color:#900">iMa<span style="color:#090">tth<span style="color:#4682b4">ew</span>]] ([[User talk:IMatthew|talk]])'''</span> 19:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
542490 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542489 +++$+++ 542489 +++$+++ 2008-09-18 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.221802200E09 +++$+++ I don't care anymore. Not trying to be heartless, just stating fact.  +++$+++ :I don't care anymore. Not trying to be heartless, just stating fact. [[User:Dreamafter|Dreamafter]] ([[User talk:Dreamafter#top|talk]]) 22:30, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

280347 +++$+++ Huon +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-22 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.264206240E09 +++$+++ You recently blocked [[Special:Contributions\/Qwertyisbest|Qwertyisbest]] for page-move vandalism. I just noticed a user named [[Special:Contributions\/Qwertyismykeyboard|Qwertyismykeyboard]] editing an article Qwertyisbest was interested in, and the assumption of sockpuppetry doesn't seem too far-fetched. Qwertyismykeyboard's edit wasn't vandalism, though. What should be done? Block evasion is prohibited, of course, but calling for checkuser seems like overkill right now. Should I just wait and watch? Yours,  +++$+++ You recently blocked [[Special:Contributions/Qwertyisbest|Qwertyisbest]] for page-move vandalism. I just noticed a user named [[Special:Contributions/Qwertyismykeyboard|Qwertyismykeyboard]] editing an article Qwertyisbest was interested in, and the assumption of sockpuppetry doesn't seem too far-fetched. Qwertyismykeyboard's edit wasn't vandalism, though. What should be done? Block evasion is prohibited, of course, but calling for checkuser seems like overkill right now. Should I just wait and watch? Yours, [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 16:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
280348 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280347 +++$+++ 280347 +++$+++ 2010-01-22 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.264210260E09 +++$+++ I guess I would just keep an eye on that account, for now.  +++$+++ :I guess I would just keep an eye on that account, for now. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
280349 +++$+++ Huon +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280347 +++$+++ 280348 +++$+++ 2010-01-22 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.264213500E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks!  +++$+++ ::Ok, thanks! [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 18:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

280351 +++$+++ Hardyplants +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-27 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.264654740E09 +++$+++ I do not want to get into a fight over the AD. CE issue:  I left a note on Calcearius\u200e talk page, will you look at it and see if any thing else needs to added so that this issue does not become contentious.  Thanks.   +++$+++ I do not want to get into a fight over the AD. CE issue:  I left a note on Calcearius‎ talk page, will you look at it and see if any thing else needs to added so that this issue does not become contentious.  Thanks.  [[User:Hardyplants|Hardyplants]] ([[User talk:Hardyplants|talk]]) 20:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
280352 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280351 +++$+++ 280351 +++$+++ 2010-01-27 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.264656300E09 +++$+++ I think your edit at [[Epistles of Clement]] was fine (even though it did revert my \"circa\" to \"c.\" changes -- which I've now redone -- otherwise my change of one \"AD\" to \"CE\" was simply for the purpose of internal consistency). So the article now looks ok to me with respect to date era. I also agree and support RJC's and your comments at [[User talk:Calcearius]], and can't think of anything that needs saying there. But if you need support for your reversion back to BC\/AD eras on that article, I will support your edit based upon the argument that the article used that date era originally (although I personally don't put any stock in the \"topic\" argument). Regards,  +++$+++ :I think your edit at [[Epistles of Clement]] was fine (even though it did revert my "circa" to "c." changes -- which I've now redone -- otherwise my change of one "AD" to "CE" was simply for the purpose of internal consistency). So the article now looks ok to me with respect to date era. I also agree and support RJC's and your comments at [[User talk:Calcearius]], and can't think of anything that needs saying there. But if you need support for your reversion back to BC/AD eras on that article, I will support your edit based upon the argument that the article used that date era originally (although I personally don't put any stock in the "topic" argument). Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:25, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

280354 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-29 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.264763400E09 +++$+++ Hi Steven. Thanks for your two years + of service to the AC. It was a pleasure serving (briefly) with you.  +++$+++ Hi Steven. Thanks for your two years + of service to the AC. It was a pleasure serving (briefly) with you. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
280355 +++$+++ Stephen Bain +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280354 +++$+++ 280354 +++$+++ 2010-01-31 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.264933500E09 +++$+++ Thank you Paul, I enjoyed working with you also. I'm sure I can speak for the 2009 Committee in saying that we also appreciated your assistance in other capacities since leaving the Committee. -- +++$+++ :Thank you Paul, I enjoyed working with you also. I'm sure I can speak for the 2009 Committee in saying that we also appreciated your assistance in other capacities since leaving the Committee. --[[User:Stephen Bain|bainer]]&nbsp;([[User_talk:Stephen Bain|talk]]) 02:25, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

18211 +++$+++ Parrot of Doom +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310320500E09 +++$+++ One of the loveliest little Cheshire villages I've ever had the pleasure to cycle through, and yet the article is almost non-existent.  I wonder, given your knowledge of churches and halls, if you know much about this place?  Any good sources I could use to expand it?  I'd love the opportunity to go back one nice sunny day and get some decent [http:\/\/www.google.co.uk\/search?q=great+budworth&hl=en&safe=off&prmd=ivnsm&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=nYQZTra9JNSIhQf5q-nMBQ&ved=0CDwQsAQ&biw=1680&bih=925 photographs]. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ One of the loveliest little Cheshire villages I've ever had the pleasure to cycle through, and yet the article is almost non-existent.  I wonder, given your knowledge of churches and halls, if you know much about this place?  Any good sources I could use to expand it?  I'd love the opportunity to go back one nice sunny day and get some decent [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=great+budworth&hl=en&safe=off&prmd=ivnsm&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=nYQZTra9JNSIhQf5q-nMBQ&ved=0CDwQsAQ&biw=1680&bih=925 photographs]. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Parrot of Doom|Parrot]] [[User talk:Parrot of Doom|of Doom]]</span> 10:55, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
18212 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18211 +++$+++ 18211 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.310321520E09 +++$+++ I absolutely agree that this delightful village, almost deliberately hidden from the main road, deserves much better coverage. I think every house in the main street is listed.  Can't really help though on sources; Pevsner is near-useless, apart from the material about the church, about which there is a reasonable article ([[St Mary and All Saints' Church, Great Budworth]]); and the article on [[Arley Hall]] is not bad.  I've written a few articles on some of the individual buildings, so I'll add those to a See also section, which isn't much, but at least a start.  Cheers. -- +++$+++ :I absolutely agree that this delightful village, almost deliberately hidden from the main road, deserves much better coverage. I think every house in the main street is listed.  Can't really help though on sources; Pevsner is near-useless, apart from the material about the church, about which there is a reasonable article ([[St Mary and All Saints' Church, Great Budworth]]); and the article on [[Arley Hall]] is not bad.  I've written a few articles on some of the individual buildings, so I'll add those to a See also section, which isn't much, but at least a start.  Cheers. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 11:12, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
18213 +++$+++ Parrot of Doom +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18211 +++$+++ 18212 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.310330220E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I need to finish up with my home town of Flixton (keep forgetting to go to the library) but I agree it's a gorgeous little place and deserves better.  I'll see what I can do. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks.  I need to finish up with my home town of Flixton (keep forgetting to go to the library) but I agree it's a gorgeous little place and deserves better.  I'll see what I can do. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Parrot of Doom|Parrot]] [[User talk:Parrot of Doom|of Doom]]</span> 13:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
18214 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18211 +++$+++ 18212 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.310434980E09 +++$+++ I see that you're up to [[Whatcroft Hall]] with the Cheshire country houses Peter, sterling work. Tell you what, to give you a bit of a lift I'll do the remaining ones beginning X, Y and Z. Can't say fairer than that.  +++$+++ ::I see that you're up to [[Whatcroft Hall]] with the Cheshire country houses Peter, sterling work. Tell you what, to give you a bit of a lift I'll do the remaining ones beginning X, Y and Z. Can't say fairer than that. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 18:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
18215 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18211 +++$+++ 18214 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310436840E09 +++$+++ Actually, I'm rather enjoying myself, so don't spoil it.  Seriously, I've been fascinated to discover what's there, where it is, and what's happened to it, so thanks for setting it up.  If Dr B thinks he can make a controllable list of country houses in England, good luck to him; a half-decent list of just those in the (smallish) county of Cheshire would be a challenge.  Less than 10 to do now!  Cheers. -- +++$+++ :::Actually, I'm rather enjoying myself, so don't spoil it.  Seriously, I've been fascinated to discover what's there, where it is, and what's happened to it, so thanks for setting it up.  If Dr B thinks he can make a controllable list of country houses in England, good luck to him; a half-decent list of just those in the (smallish) county of Cheshire would be a challenge.  Less than 10 to do now!  Cheers. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 19:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
18216 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18211 +++$+++ 18215 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.310437020E09 +++$+++ I'm equally dubious about that list idea. And as I'm sure you know there are no Cheshire country houses beginning with X, Y or Z. If there had been I wouldn't have offered. :-)  +++$+++ ::::I'm equally dubious about that list idea. And as I'm sure you know there are no Cheshire country houses beginning with X, Y or Z. If there had been I wouldn't have offered. :-) [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 19:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
18217 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18211 +++$+++ 18216 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.310437380E09 +++$+++ Do you think I hadn't spotted that???? -- +++$+++ :::::Do you think I hadn't spotted that???? --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 19:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
18218 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18211 +++$+++ 18217 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310441220E09 +++$+++ I've expanded Great Budworth, more to come tomorrow, although some of the lettering of the 1810 PD text is awkward, probably best if it was rewritten into a coherent history and in chrono order. Why are you dubious about a list of country houses? There is a finite number. To start with I would list all of the houses currently with articles by country and then missing articles can gradually be added to it. It would of course take time to build as full a list as possible but it is achievable eventually. Of course I will require your aid Peter in routing out missing articles and routing out any duds I may have added such as townhouses by accident and working with me to try to cover them. Ideally we need a Country houses of Cheshire type book for every country. \u2666  +++$+++ ::::::I've expanded Great Budworth, more to come tomorrow, although some of the lettering of the 1810 PD text is awkward, probably best if it was rewritten into a coherent history and in chrono order. Why are you dubious about a list of country houses? There is a finite number. To start with I would list all of the houses currently with articles by country and then missing articles can gradually be added to it. It would of course take time to build as full a list as possible but it is achievable eventually. Of course I will require your aid Peter in routing out missing articles and routing out any duds I may have added such as townhouses by accident and working with me to try to cover them. Ideally we need a Country houses of Cheshire type book for every country. ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 20:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
18219 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18211 +++$+++ 18218 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.310450640E09 +++$+++ There's also a finite number of bricks in Cheshire; that a number is finite doesn't make it manageable.  +++$+++ :::::::There's also a finite number of bricks in Cheshire; that a number is finite doesn't make it manageable. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
18220 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18211 +++$+++ 18217 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310450400E09 +++$+++ Of course I knew you'd spotted that Peter, but the question is, did all the kiddie admins looking to be the fastest blocker in the West realise that your \"don't spoil it\" was equally light-hearted? I've been blocked for less in the past.  +++$+++ ::::::Of course I knew you'd spotted that Peter, but the question is, did all the kiddie admins looking to be the fastest blocker in the West realise that your "don't spoil it" was equally light-hearted? I've been blocked for less in the past. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 23:00, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

280356 +++$+++ Haploidavey +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-01 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.265068860E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for the note and your work. <s>on those articles. Both are neccesary and<\/s> Your re-instatements are much appreciated. Regards,  +++$+++ Thanks so much for the note and your work. <s>on those articles. Both are neccesary and</s> Your re-instatements are much appreciated. Regards, [[User:Haploidavey|Haploidavey]] ([[User talk:Haploidavey|talk]]) 16:01, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
280357 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280356 +++$+++ 280356 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.265072100E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome.  +++$+++ :You're very welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
280358 +++$+++ Haploidavey +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280356 +++$+++ 280357 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.265072400E09 +++$+++ Loved the comment! The possibility didn't even begin to ''think'' about crossing my mind...  +++$+++ ::Loved the comment! The possibility didn't even begin to ''think'' about crossing my mind... [[User:Haploidavey|Haploidavey]] ([[User talk:Haploidavey|talk]]) 17:00, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
280359 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280356 +++$+++ 280358 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.265072760E09 +++$+++ ;-)  +++$+++ ::: ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:06, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

280360 +++$+++ 86.184.133.167 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-01 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.265083980E09 +++$+++ Any possibility of reinstating [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_General_Idea_of_the_Revolution_in_the_Nineteenth_Century this]? It is a perfectly good article although it needs Wikifying and a bit more research on how to link it to other articles.  Thanks for your help with the other articles [[Special:Contributions\/86.184.133.167|86.184.133.167]] ( +++$+++ Any possibility of reinstating [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_General_Idea_of_the_Revolution_in_the_Nineteenth_Century this]? It is a perfectly good article although it needs Wikifying and a bit more research on how to link it to other articles.  Thanks for your help with the other articles [[Special:Contributions/86.184.133.167|86.184.133.167]] ([[User talk:86.184.133.167|talk]]) 20:13, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
280361 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280360 +++$+++ 280360 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.265088060E09 +++$+++ Why don't you email me and we can discuss it.  +++$+++ :Why don't you email me and we can discuss it. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
280362 +++$+++ 86.184.133.167 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280360 +++$+++ 280361 +++$+++ 2010-02-01 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.265088180E09 +++$+++ Not interested in an unblock. No point with a floating IP. But am interested in reinstating that article. Can you not do that?  [[Special:Contributions\/86.184.133.167|86.184.133.167]] ( +++$+++ :: Not interested in an unblock. No point with a floating IP. But am interested in reinstating that article. Can you not do that?  [[Special:Contributions/86.184.133.167|86.184.133.167]] ([[User talk:86.184.133.167|talk]]) 21:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

280364 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-07 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.265540640E09 +++$+++ Usually if you have to manually edit a page to fix the formatting so that your script will accept it, you're doing something very wrong. :-)  -- +++$+++ Usually if you have to manually edit a page to fix the formatting so that your script will accept it, you're doing something very wrong. :-)  --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride|talk]]) 03:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
280365 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280364 +++$+++ 280364 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.265544060E09 +++$+++ I guess in this case that would be trying to parse free verse.  +++$+++ :I guess in this case that would be trying to parse free verse. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

18221 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.310488500E09 +++$+++ You have such a pessimistic attitude Malleus to practically everything. Why are you such a negative, cynical person?\u2666  +++$+++ You have such a pessimistic attitude Malleus to practically everything. Why are you such a negative, cynical person?♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 09:35, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
18222 +++$+++ Malleus_Fatuorum +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.310505180E09 +++$+++ Just lucky I guess.  +++$+++ :Just lucky I guess. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 14:13, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
18223 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ 18222 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.310516160E09 +++$+++ Re Great Budworth.  Thanks for the addition.  But IMO it needs to be translated into modern English, and to be used in the context of a 21st&nbsp;century encyclopaedia, rather than how things were seen (and described) in 1810.  I do have some sources describing the role taken by [[Rowland Egerton-Warburton]] of [[Arley Hall]], in whose estate the village stood, to employ top architects in the 19th&nbsp;century to make it more [[picturesque]], which is pretty well the state in which we see it today.  I will add this at some time, and try to link it to what is already in the article. -- +++$+++ ::Re Great Budworth.  Thanks for the addition.  But IMO it needs to be translated into modern English, and to be used in the context of a 21st&nbsp;century encyclopaedia, rather than how things were seen (and described) in 1810.  I do have some sources describing the role taken by [[Rowland Egerton-Warburton]] of [[Arley Hall]], in whose estate the village stood, to employ top architects in the 19th&nbsp;century to make it more [[picturesque]], which is pretty well the state in which we see it today.  I will add this at some time, and try to link it to what is already in the article. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 17:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
18224 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ 18223 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.310528580E09 +++$+++ Well based on that outlook we may as well give up building wikipedia right now because the scope of potential articles is impossibly large. If we can have a [[list of minor planets]] we can most certainly have a list of country houses in the small island that is Great Britain.\u2666  +++$+++ :::Well based on that outlook we may as well give up building wikipedia right now because the scope of potential articles is impossibly large. If we can have a [[list of minor planets]] we can most certainly have a list of country houses in the small island that is Great Britain.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 20:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
18225 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ 18224 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.310528880E09 +++$+++ Fine, if you do it in that sort of format.  I shall continue to contribute in my humble way.  Make of it what you will.  Cheers. -- +++$+++ ::::Fine, if you do it in that sort of format.  I shall continue to contribute in my humble way.  Make of it what you will.  Cheers. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 20:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
18226 +++$+++ Ning-ning +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ 18225 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310532540E09 +++$+++ Over-Whisky's near Budworth?  +++$+++ :::::Over-Whisky's near Budworth? [[User:Ning-ning|Ning-ning]] ([[User talk:Ning-ning|talk]]) 21:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
18227 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ 18226 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.310532720E09 +++$+++ I will go live with it shortly at [[List of country houses in the United Kingdom]] as a very rough start and many empty counties for Scotland Wales and N. Ireland. It will just be a simple list for now in 4 columns under each county. Initially I may have added some duds but the vast majority should be country houses. The idea is that over time we add a few missing articles under each country, start the articles then root out more etc until we can build the fullest coverage we can. I'm pretty sure many of the ENglish counties will have at least 200 country houses but right now many are poorly developed, like Warwickshire has less than 10 articles I believe. But anyway if the list gets too huge over time first we can split by region England, Wales, Scotland etc or List of country houses in England - Counties B etc. . Of course we could have tabled lists like [[Grade I listed buildings in Brighton and Hove]] for each county with a List of country houses in Berkshire etc but I for one am not willing to spend that amount of time on a list! But I'm sure you will find this as a useful page for building content on english manors and country houses on here. I've begun the list at  +++$+++ ::::::I will go live with it shortly at [[List of country houses in the United Kingdom]] as a very rough start and many empty counties for Scotland Wales and N. Ireland. It will just be a simple list for now in 4 columns under each county. Initially I may have added some duds but the vast majority should be country houses. The idea is that over time we add a few missing articles under each country, start the articles then root out more etc until we can build the fullest coverage we can. I'm pretty sure many of the ENglish counties will have at least 200 country houses but right now many are poorly developed, like Warwickshire has less than 10 articles I believe. But anyway if the list gets too huge over time first we can split by region England, Wales, Scotland etc or List of country houses in England - Counties B etc. . Of course we could have tabled lists like [[Grade I listed buildings in Brighton and Hove]] for each county with a List of country houses in Berkshire etc but I for one am not willing to spend that amount of time on a list! But I'm sure you will find this as a useful page for building content on english manors and country houses on here. I've begun the list at [[User:Dr. Blofeld/List of country houses in the United Kingdom]]. I'm logging off now but I will continue on it tomorrow. Its a list of articles we currently have to start with of course the eventual goal is to add all of the missing articles bit by bit over time... Its currently 40kb, if it ever grows over 150kb then it might be wise to split but its manageble for now.    ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 21:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
18228 +++$+++ Parrot of Doom +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.310535300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for expanding G.Budworth chaps.  I'll definitely get some decent images for the article, just need a sunny day.  By the way, I don't suppose any of you know anything about [http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?q=53.36087,-2.34896&ll=53.322443,-2.511358&spn=0.001327,0.003484&t=h&z=19&layer=c&cbll=53.322511,-2.511279&panoid=AeC1U5O9fX5Jp7gfmCw0ig&cbp=12,284.83,,0,2.91 this house]?  I cycle past it sometimes, usually with my jaw on the floor.  It's either some local lord's gaff, or the poshest farmhouse I ever saw.  I only wish I could afford such a thing :( <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for expanding G.Budworth chaps.  I'll definitely get some decent images for the article, just need a sunny day.  By the way, I don't suppose any of you know anything about [http://maps.google.com/maps?q=53.36087,-2.34896&ll=53.322443,-2.511358&spn=0.001327,0.003484&t=h&z=19&layer=c&cbll=53.322511,-2.511279&panoid=AeC1U5O9fX5Jp7gfmCw0ig&cbp=12,284.83,,0,2.91 this house]?  I cycle past it sometimes, usually with my jaw on the floor.  It's either some local lord's gaff, or the poshest farmhouse I ever saw.  I only wish I could afford such a thing :( <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Parrot of Doom|Parrot]] [[User talk:Parrot of Doom|of Doom]]</span> 22:35, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
18229 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ 18228 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.310575800E09 +++$+++ Now there's a puzzle.  According to the coords with the link, it should be [[Ashley Hall, Cheshire]], and that fits with the GR given in the National Heritage List [http:\/\/list.english-heritage.org.uk\/resultsingle.aspx?uid=1329655 here].  But the photograph for this building in Images of England [http:\/\/www.imagesofengland.org.uk\/Details\/default.aspx?pid=2&id=58378 here] does not seem to match. Thoughts? -- +++$+++ ::Now there's a puzzle.  According to the coords with the link, it should be [[Ashley Hall, Cheshire]], and that fits with the GR given in the National Heritage List [http://list.english-heritage.org.uk/resultsingle.aspx?uid=1329655 here].  But the photograph for this building in Images of England [http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/Details/default.aspx?pid=2&id=58378 here] does not seem to match. Thoughts? --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 09:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
18230 +++$+++ Parrot of Doom +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ 18229 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.310609400E09 +++$+++ Nah, it isn't Ashley Hall - that's a few miles to the east, alongside the M56.  I don't know how Google does coordinates, maybe when I linked it I'd also been looking at Ashley Hall.  Which reminds me, that article also needs a pic. <span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ :::Nah, it isn't Ashley Hall - that's a few miles to the east, alongside the M56.  I don't know how Google does coordinates, maybe when I linked it I'd also been looking at Ashley Hall.  Which reminds me, that article also needs a pic. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Parrot of Doom|Parrot]] [[User talk:Parrot of Doom|of Doom]]</span> 19:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
18231 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18221 +++$+++ 18230 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310658120E09 +++$+++ Yes please, next time you're cycling by. -- +++$+++ ::::Yes please, next time you're cycling by. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 08:42, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

280366 +++$+++ Franklin.vp +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-08 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.265630160E09 +++$+++ and what about in a different place? ([[recursion]]) <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:0.5px;\"> +++$+++ and what about in a different place? ([[recursion]]) <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:0.5px;">[[User:franklin.vp|<font style="color:black;background:white;font-family:sans-serif;" >'''&nbsp;franklin&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 03:56, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
280367 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280366 +++$+++ 280366 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.265630280E09 +++$+++ The editorial consensus is, I believe that such \"recursive links\" are not appropriate, so please don't.  +++$+++ :The editorial consensus is, I believe that such "recursive links" are not appropriate, so please don't. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 03:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

280369 +++$+++ Candent shlimazel +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-09 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.265716080E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. I notice you're active in maintaining the article on the Roman emperor [[Nero]]. I think there may be vandalism in footnote 5 (\"Nero was not a fiddle player...\"), but I've looked at some past revisions and it's been in place for awhile, so I'm not sure. Would you mind checking it out and addressing it if appropriate? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Paul. I notice you're active in maintaining the article on the Roman emperor [[Nero]]. I think there may be vandalism in footnote 5 ("Nero was not a fiddle player..."), but I've looked at some past revisions and it's been in place for awhile, so I'm not sure. Would you mind checking it out and addressing it if appropriate? Thanks, [[User:Candent shlimazel|Candent shlimazel]] ([[User talk:Candent shlimazel|talk]]) 03:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280370 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280369 +++$+++ 280369 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.265716800E09 +++$+++ Yes clearly vandalism. I've now fixed this. Thanks,  +++$+++ :Yes clearly vandalism. I've now fixed this. Thanks, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

542514 +++$+++ OhanaUnited +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542514 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-22 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.264209180E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure if you are on the mailing list for Wikimedia Canada, so that's why I left you this message. You're previously involved in bid process for hosting Wikimania in Toronto. Right now we're forming a bid team for Wikimania in 2011. Would you be interested?  +++$+++ I'm not sure if you are on the mailing list for Wikimedia Canada, so that's why I left you this message. You're previously involved in bid process for hosting Wikimania in Toronto. Right now we're forming a bid team for Wikimania in 2011. Would you be interested? [[User:OhanaUnited|<b><font color="#0000FF">OhanaUnited</font></b>]][[User talk:OhanaUnited|<b><font color="green"><sup>Talk page</sup></font></b>]] 17:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
542515 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 542514 +++$+++ 542514 +++$+++ 2010-02-03 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.265196720E09 +++$+++ For the coordinators, \u2014<font face=\"Baskerville Old Face\"> +++$+++ *For the coordinators, —<font face="Baskerville Old Face">[[User:the_ed17|<font color="800000">Ed]]&nbsp;[[User talk:the_ed17|<font color="800000">(talk</font>]] • [[WP:OMT|<font color="800000">majestic titan)]]</font> 03:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

280371 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.265775600E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/MZMcBride_2\/Proposed_decision#Durova.27s_commentaries This] appears to have 6, but from a reading of the top of the page, with 0-1 abstentions, 7 are needed to pass? ''' +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MZMcBride_2/Proposed_decision#Durova.27s_commentaries This] appears to have 6, but from a reading of the top of the page, with 0-1 abstentions, 7 are needed to pass? '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:20, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280372 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280371 +++$+++ 280371 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.265775840E09 +++$+++ There's also one recusal which, as regards to the majority, acts the same as an abstain.  +++$+++ :There's also one recusal which, as regards to the majority, acts the same as an abstain. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280373 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280371 +++$+++ 280372 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.265776020E09 +++$+++ ''[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/MZMcBride_2\/Proposed_decision&oldid=342999198 For this case, there are 13 active arbitrators, not counting 3 who are inactive and 1 who is recused, so 7 support votes are a majority.]'' = this says the recusals should not be used in the count. ''' +++$+++ ::''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MZMcBride_2/Proposed_decision&oldid=342999198 For this case, there are 13 active arbitrators, not counting 3 who are inactive and 1 who is recused, so 7 support votes are a majority.]'' = this says the recusals should not be used in the count. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:27, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280374 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280371 +++$+++ 280373 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.265776680E09 +++$+++ There is one arb recused on the entire case, Cool Hand Luke, and three arbs inactive Carcharoth , Hersfold , and Wizardman. That leaves 13 active arbs for this case. However on finding 6A, Risker has recused and Mailer Diablo has abstained. That leaves 11 arbs active on this particular finding, thus the majority for this finding is 6.  +++$+++ :::There is one arb recused on the entire case, Cool Hand Luke, and three arbs inactive Carcharoth , Hersfold , and Wizardman. That leaves 13 active arbs for this case. However on finding 6A, Risker has recused and Mailer Diablo has abstained. That leaves 11 arbs active on this particular finding, thus the majority for this finding is 6. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

463246 +++$+++ Jerem43 +++$+++ Youngamerican +++$+++ 463246 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-16 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.247736060E09 +++$+++ No not really. -- +++$+++ No not really. --[[User:Jerem43|Jeremy]] <small>([[User talk:Jerem43|blah blah]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jerem43|I did it!]])</small> 02:21, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
463247 +++$+++ Jerem43 +++$+++ Youngamerican +++$+++ 463246 +++$+++ 463246 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.247792160E09 +++$+++ <small>oops, my bad<\/small> Don't know why I thought that, sorry!! You from Kentucky then? You're interested in Southern Ohio, so my assessment of your location belief stems from that. -- +++$+++ :<small>oops, my bad</small> Don't know why I thought that, sorry!! You from Kentucky then? You're interested in Southern Ohio, so my assessment of your location belief stems from that. --[[User:Jerem43|Jeremy]] <small>([[User talk:Jerem43|blah blah]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jerem43|I did it!]])</small> 17:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
463248 +++$+++ Jerem43 +++$+++ Youngamerican +++$+++ 463246 +++$+++ 463247 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.247793240E09 +++$+++ Yeah Adminship is something I would aspire to. -- +++$+++ ::Yeah Adminship is something I would aspire to. --[[User:Jerem43|Jeremy]] <small>([[User talk:Jerem43|blah blah]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jerem43|I did it!]])</small> 18:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

280375 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.265776800E09 +++$+++ This is a serious problem. ''' +++$+++ This is a serious problem. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280376 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280375 +++$+++ 280375 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.265776980E09 +++$+++ What's the problem? This has always how things have been counted. A recusal for the entire case reduces the number of active arbs for that case by one. A recusal on a particular proposal reduces the number of active arbs for that proposal by one.  +++$+++ :What's the problem? This has always how things have been counted. A recusal for the entire case reduces the number of active arbs for that case by one. A recusal on a particular proposal reduces the number of active arbs for that proposal by one. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280377 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280375 +++$+++ 280376 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.265777220E09 +++$+++ And also, don't opposes count against the supports? ''' +++$+++ ::And also, don't opposes count against the supports? '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280378 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280375 +++$+++ 280377 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.265777280E09 +++$+++ No.  +++$+++ :::No. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280379 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280375 +++$+++ 280378 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.265777400E09 +++$+++ I just think it is wholly inappropriate for a \"recuse\" to be counted in the same manner as an \"abstain\". ''' +++$+++ ::::I just think it is wholly inappropriate for a "recuse" to be counted in the same manner as an "abstain". '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:50, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280380 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280375 +++$+++ 280379 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.265777640E09 +++$+++ I think you are confused about how abstains work then. Neither recusals nor abstains are technically \"votes\", both simply act to reduce the number of voters.  +++$+++ :::::I think you are confused about how abstains work then. Neither recusals nor abstains are technically "votes", both simply act to reduce the number of voters. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280381 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280375 +++$+++ 280380 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.265777700E09 +++$+++ Yes but they are supposed to do that in ''different'' ways. See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/MZMcBride_2\/Proposed_decision#Apparent_problem_with_vote_counting_and_partial_recusal]. ''' +++$+++ ::::::Yes but they are supposed to do that in ''different'' ways. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MZMcBride_2/Proposed_decision#Apparent_problem_with_vote_counting_and_partial_recusal]. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:55, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280382 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280375 +++$+++ 280381 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.265778600E09 +++$+++ No they are not (see my reply there)  +++$+++ :::::::No they are not (see my reply there) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

18232 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310606040E09 +++$+++ If you could update the page when you start articles like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_country_houses_in_the_United_Kingdom&action=historysubmit&diff=439296080&oldid=439290219 this] it would be a great help.\u2666  +++$+++ If you could update the page when you start articles like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_country_houses_in_the_United_Kingdom&action=historysubmit&diff=439296080&oldid=439290219 this] it would be a great help.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 18:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
18233 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18232 +++$+++ 18232 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.310658360E09 +++$+++ Sure. -- +++$+++ :Sure. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 08:46, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

18234 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.310609460E09 +++$+++ Ah the London\/urban dilemna and the previous naming convention has persuaded me to rename it [[List of historic houses in the United Kingdom]]. I think this is probably a more suitable title.\u2666  +++$+++ Ah the London/urban dilemna and the previous naming convention has persuaded me to rename it [[List of historic houses in the United Kingdom]]. I think this is probably a more suitable title.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 19:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
18235 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18234 +++$+++ 18234 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.310658360E09 +++$+++ Not really a surprise; some of the Cheshire ones were borderline anyway.  I'll add some more town and otherwise-historic houses in due course. -- +++$+++ :Not really a surprise; some of the Cheshire ones were borderline anyway.  I'll add some more town and otherwise-historic houses in due course. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 08:46, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

280383 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-09 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.265778720E09 +++$+++ As an aside, thank you very much Paul August for your very polite and helpful explanations during all this. ''' +++$+++ As an aside, thank you very much Paul August for your very polite and helpful explanations during all this. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 21:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280384 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280383 +++$+++ 280383 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.265778840E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. I hope you understand now.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. I hope you understand now. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

18240 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.311208500E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | For your excellent and consistent work on British churches and houses and for setting a fine example for others to follow. \u2666  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your excellent and consistent work on British churches and houses and for setting a fine example for others to follow. ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 17:35, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
18241 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18240 +++$+++ 18240 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311213120E09 +++$+++ Many thanks. -- +++$+++ :Many thanks. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 18:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

280385 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280385 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-09 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.265779500E09 +++$+++ So ... if I am understanding this correctly, an \"abstain\" ( or a recuse ) ''reduces'' the number of votes needed for a particular decision to pass, so an \"abstain\" is sort of like a \"weak support\"? ''' +++$+++ So ... if I am understanding this correctly, an "abstain" ( or a recuse ) ''reduces'' the number of votes needed for a particular decision to pass, so an "abstain" is sort of like a "weak support"? '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 21:25, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280386 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280385 +++$+++ 280385 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.265779800E09 +++$+++ In effect yes. And taking no action at all is in effect an oppose.  +++$+++ :In effect yes. And taking no action at all is in effect an oppose. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280387 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280385 +++$+++ 280386 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.265779860E09 +++$+++ Nod, thanks. It seems sometimes Arbitrators vote an \"abstain\", and then add some comment which is a comment in effect in opposition to the remedy in question, perhaps not realizing that by abstaining they are furthering its passage. ''' +++$+++ ::Nod, thanks. It seems sometimes Arbitrators vote an "abstain", and then add some comment which is a comment in effect in opposition to the remedy in question, perhaps not realizing that by abstaining they are furthering its passage. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 21:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
280388 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280385 +++$+++ 280387 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.265779980E09 +++$+++ Possibly, especially for new arbs.  +++$+++ :::Possibly, especially for new arbs. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

18242 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.311439620E09 +++$+++ No time just now - got to go out - but I really don't think sortkeys like the one for All Saints Church Harewood are useful. By all means use the \"sort as Harewood\" for specific church-type categories, but for everything else please let it sort by the natural article title. Got to go.  +++$+++ No time just now - got to go out - but I really don't think sortkeys like the one for All Saints Church Harewood are useful. By all means use the "sort as Harewood" for specific church-type categories, but for everything else please let it sort by the natural article title. Got to go. [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD|talk]]) 09:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
18243 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18242 +++$+++ 18242 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.311456900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the comment.  There seems to be disagreement about this and there may have been a discussion somewhere, sometime.  It seems that [[User:Vegaswikian|Vegaswikian]] agrees with you, and that (at least) [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]], who has been restoring defaultsorts deleted by Vegaswikian, and [[User:Belovedfreak|Belovedfreak]], think the way I do (see the last comment [[User talk:Belovedfreak#Lancs churches|here]]).  If you look at a category such as [[:Category:Churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust]], almost everything would sort by \"St\" except for the occasional \"Old\" \"All\" \"Holy\" etc, and a few chapel that sort by place name; I personally see little sense in this.  Have you any idea where we can find a consensus? -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the comment.  There seems to be disagreement about this and there may have been a discussion somewhere, sometime.  It seems that [[User:Vegaswikian|Vegaswikian]] agrees with you, and that (at least) [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]], who has been restoring defaultsorts deleted by Vegaswikian, and [[User:Belovedfreak|Belovedfreak]], think the way I do (see the last comment [[User talk:Belovedfreak#Lancs churches|here]]).  If you look at a category such as [[:Category:Churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust]], almost everything would sort by "St" except for the occasional "Old" "All" "Holy" etc, and a few chapel that sort by place name; I personally see little sense in this.  Have you any idea where we can find a consensus? --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 14:35, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
18244 +++$+++ Belovedfreak +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18242 +++$+++ 18243 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311523140E09 +++$+++ As you (Peter) know, I am pretty much in agreement with you on this. I definitely think that for categories containing only churches, they should sort under location. In a location category such as [[:Category:Buildings and structures in Manchester]], there's not much point in sorting under that location. I do think there's a grey area though, where it's not 100% clear to me which is the best way to sort. With a category like [[:Category:15th-century architecture]], I see churches that have been sorted under their locations. On the other hand, there is, for example, [[Gallox Bridge, Dunster]], currently sorting under \"G\". Categories are supposed to aid navigation, so I guess we need to think how a reader is most likely to look for a particular article. If I was looking for [[Church of St. Leonard (Jesenice)|St Leonard's Church in Jesenice]], should I look under \"S\", \"L\", \"C\" or \"J\"? Any of those is possible, but perhaps if we are consistent in sorting churches under locations (except in location categories) then readers using the categories often will soon pick up on how they are ordered. For readers using a category once, I don't think we can guarantee they will easily find the right article. I think maybe a wider discussion is needed, so that we can agree to a standard, but I can't think where. -- +++$+++ ::As you (Peter) know, I am pretty much in agreement with you on this. I definitely think that for categories containing only churches, they should sort under location. In a location category such as [[:Category:Buildings and structures in Manchester]], there's not much point in sorting under that location. I do think there's a grey area though, where it's not 100% clear to me which is the best way to sort. With a category like [[:Category:15th-century architecture]], I see churches that have been sorted under their locations. On the other hand, there is, for example, [[Gallox Bridge, Dunster]], currently sorting under "G". Categories are supposed to aid navigation, so I guess we need to think how a reader is most likely to look for a particular article. If I was looking for [[Church of St. Leonard (Jesenice)|St Leonard's Church in Jesenice]], should I look under "S", "L", "C" or "J"? Any of those is possible, but perhaps if we are consistent in sorting churches under locations (except in location categories) then readers using the categories often will soon pick up on how they are ordered. For readers using a category once, I don't think we can guarantee they will easily find the right article. I think maybe a wider discussion is needed, so that we can agree to a standard, but I can't think where. --[[User:Belovedfreak|<span style="font-family: trebuchet">Beloved</span>]][[User talk:Belovedfreak|<span style="font-family: trebuchet">Freak</span>]] 08:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

571019 +++$+++ ReverendG +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571019 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-19 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.161317340E09 +++$+++ Yes, I am an ordained minister with the [[Universal Life Church]], and no, someone else was not me.  +++$+++ Yes, I am an ordained minister with the [[Universal Life Church]], and no, someone else was not me. [[User:ReverendG|ReverendG]] 21:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
571020 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571019 +++$+++ 571019 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.161324600E09 +++$+++ Thankyou Reverend, for your response. Beaufordjohnson, who is this comment directed at? The Rev or Culverin? Could it not be said that debate can in some cases enhance the quality and consisiveness of Wikipedia? [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Thankyou Reverend, for your response. Beaufordjohnson, who is this comment directed at? The Rev or Culverin? Could it not be said that debate can in some cases enhance the quality and consisiveness of Wikipedia? [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 23:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
571021 +++$+++ ReverendG +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571019 +++$+++ 571020 +++$+++ 2006-10-20 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.161342720E09 +++$+++ Yes, in some cases it can be very helpful, but I feel Culverin's invitation was not one of those cases.  +++$+++ ::Yes, in some cases it can be very helpful, but I feel Culverin's invitation was not one of those cases. [[User:ReverendG|ReverendG]] 04:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
571022 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571019 +++$+++ 571021 +++$+++ 2006-10-20 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.161343020E09 +++$+++ How?  I feel this debate is very valid.  Especially when its is so important to society.  ''' +++$+++ :::How?  I feel this debate is very valid.  Especially when its is so important to society.  '''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 04:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
571023 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571019 +++$+++ 571022 +++$+++ 2006-10-20 04:20:00 +++$+++ 1.161343200E09 +++$+++ My page is not the place to discuss this. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::::My page is not the place to discuss this. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 04:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

18245 +++$+++ This, that and the other +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-24 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311509100E09 +++$+++ If not, I will tag them for [[WP:G7|speedy deletion]]. \u2014 <span style=\"border:dashed #666;border-width:1px 0 0 1px\"> +++$+++ If not, I will tag them for [[WP:G7|speedy deletion]]. — <span style="border:dashed #666;border-width:1px 0 0 1px">[[User:This, that and the other|This, that]]</span>, and <span style="border:dashed #666;border-width:0 1px 1px 0">[[User talk:This, that and the other|the other<small> (talk)</small>]]</span> 05:05, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
18246 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18245 +++$+++ 18245 +++$+++ 2011-07-24 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.311525240E09 +++$+++ Not being a computer expert, I am not sure.  They look like the navboxes on my User page, but are not up to date.  Are they the same, or is it something I have used in the past and abandoned (can't remember)?  I do not want to lose the navboxes because I am updating them frequently.  If the templates above are different, and obsolete, yes they should be deleted.  Advice please. -- +++$+++ :Not being a computer expert, I am not sure.  They look like the navboxes on my User page, but are not up to date.  Are they the same, or is it something I have used in the past and abandoned (can't remember)?  I do not want to lose the navboxes because I am updating them frequently.  If the templates above are different, and obsolete, yes they should be deleted.  Advice please. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 09:34, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
18247 +++$+++ Belovedfreak +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18245 +++$+++ 18246 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.311695760E09 +++$+++ I don't think you're using them. They're [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:WhatLinksHere\/Template:Peter_I._Vardy_new_articles not linked] to from your userpage, and it looks like you just update [[User:Peter I. Vardy]] with each new addition. If you're worried, you could always blank them first to make sure nothing's affected & then have them deleted.-- +++$+++ ::I don't think you're using them. They're [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Peter_I._Vardy_new_articles not linked] to from your userpage, and it looks like you just update [[User:Peter I. Vardy]] with each new addition. If you're worried, you could always blank them first to make sure nothing's affected & then have them deleted.--[[User:Belovedfreak|<span style="font-family: trebuchet">Beloved</span>]][[User talk:Belovedfreak|<span style="font-family: trebuchet">Freak</span>]] 08:56, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
18248 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18245 +++$+++ 18247 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311721200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the suggestion.  I've done that and it does not affect the navboxes on my user page.  Looking at the history (which I should have done before), I have not used the templates for nearly two years, so clearly they are now obsolete and should be deleted. -- +++$+++ :::Thanks for the suggestion.  I've done that and it does not affect the navboxes on my user page.  Looking at the history (which I should have done before), I have not used the templates for nearly two years, so clearly they are now obsolete and should be deleted. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 16:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

280391 +++$+++ 174.3.98.236 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280391 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-13 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.266057960E09 +++$+++ The template is deprecated, so I thought that they should be changed.  I think the reason is because we should not be talking about an article in a hatnote.  Explanations prepared if required.[[Special:Contributions\/174.3.98.236|174.3.98.236]] ( +++$+++ The template is deprecated, so I thought that they should be changed.  I think the reason is because we should not be talking about an article in a hatnote.  Explanations prepared if required.[[Special:Contributions/174.3.98.236|174.3.98.236]] ([[User talk:174.3.98.236|talk]]) 02:46, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
280392 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280391 +++$+++ 280391 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.266058200E09 +++$+++ Yes the template is deprecated, and can be replaced with [[template:about]].  +++$+++ :Yes the template is deprecated, and can be replaced with [[template:about]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:50, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

18249 +++$+++ Belovedfreak +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18249 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 09:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311696060E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've been looking at sources for St Thomas' Church, Garstang, and Hartwell & Pevsner make no mention of Paley & Austin. They say \"The chancel was built in 1875 by Longworth & Gardner\". (p. 302). It doesn't seem to be mentioned by the [http:\/\/www.british-history.ac.uk\/report.aspx?compid=53245 ''Victoria County History'' account]. The official website for the church [http:\/\/www.stthomasgarstang.co.uk\/?History mentions] a chancel being added in 1874, but doesn't name an architect. Can you confirm that this was a Paley & Austin one, and if so, how do you think we should deal with this conflict? -- +++$+++ Hi, I've been looking at sources for St Thomas' Church, Garstang, and Hartwell & Pevsner make no mention of Paley & Austin. They say "The chancel was built in 1875 by Longworth & Gardner". (p. 302). It doesn't seem to be mentioned by the [http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=53245 ''Victoria County History'' account]. The official website for the church [http://www.stthomasgarstang.co.uk/?History mentions] a chancel being added in 1874, but doesn't name an architect. Can you confirm that this was a Paley & Austin one, and if so, how do you think we should deal with this conflict? --[[User:Belovedfreak|<span style="font-family: trebuchet">Beloved</span>]][[User talk:Belovedfreak|<span style="font-family: trebuchet">Freak</span>]] 09:01, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
18250 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18249 +++$+++ 18249 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311723540E09 +++$+++ Yes, I've met this sort of problem myself and, (I hate to say it) but Pevsner (original series and subsequent updates) can actually be wrong(!).  It causes difficulty when sources disagree. Who are we to decide which is correct (or the more authoritative)?  In the case of St Thomas, Garstang, I gave the attribution to P&A because I found it in Price's book (details in the Bibliography of [[List of ecclesiastical works by Paley and Austin]]).  This is a slim book, but it is devoted entirely to the Lancaster practice in all its phases.  It was lent to me by our top local top historian, who knew the author (his copy was signed by the author).  Sadly the historian died recently and I have returned the book to his widow, so I can't double-check it.  From what I remember about the background of Price's book, the author spent a couple of years in the Lancaster archives to obtain his attributions.  How to deal with the conflict?  I did have this problem in another article (can't remember which one).  I think I said something like: X says this, and Y says that, with both references, and leave it to the reader, new research, or whatever to sort it out (maybe) some time in the future.  I don't think we should express an opinion on the reliability of the sources.  (Although, off the record, for St T's I would go for Price, because his work is focused just on this practice, while Hartwell & Pevsner spread their interest much more widely.)  What do you think about this? -- +++$+++ :Yes, I've met this sort of problem myself and, (I hate to say it) but Pevsner (original series and subsequent updates) can actually be wrong(!).  It causes difficulty when sources disagree. Who are we to decide which is correct (or the more authoritative)?  In the case of St Thomas, Garstang, I gave the attribution to P&A because I found it in Price's book (details in the Bibliography of [[List of ecclesiastical works by Paley and Austin]]).  This is a slim book, but it is devoted entirely to the Lancaster practice in all its phases.  It was lent to me by our top local top historian, who knew the author (his copy was signed by the author).  Sadly the historian died recently and I have returned the book to his widow, so I can't double-check it.  From what I remember about the background of Price's book, the author spent a couple of years in the Lancaster archives to obtain his attributions.  How to deal with the conflict?  I did have this problem in another article (can't remember which one).  I think I said something like: X says this, and Y says that, with both references, and leave it to the reader, new research, or whatever to sort it out (maybe) some time in the future.  I don't think we should express an opinion on the reliability of the sources.  (Although, off the record, for St T's I would go for Price, because his work is focused just on this practice, while Hartwell & Pevsner spread their interest much more widely.)  What do you think about this? --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 16:39, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
18251 +++$+++ Belovedfreak +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18249 +++$+++ 18250 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.311898320E09 +++$+++ Ok, I agree that Price is likely to be more reliable in this case as it is actually focussing on Paley & Austin. It would be strange to include a church in the book that actually had nothing to do with the architects. I'll work something out \u2014 I may put an explanation of the source differences in a footnote or something. I've been working on the first three churches on my list but have been travelling and not always where my books are, so it may take a few more days to get them up.-- +++$+++ ::Ok, I agree that Price is likely to be more reliable in this case as it is actually focussing on Paley & Austin. It would be strange to include a church in the book that actually had nothing to do with the architects. I'll work something out — I may put an explanation of the source differences in a footnote or something. I've been working on the first three churches on my list but have been travelling and not always where my books are, so it may take a few more days to get them up.--[[User:Belovedfreak|<span style="font-family: trebuchet">Beloved</span>]][[User talk:Belovedfreak|<span style="font-family: trebuchet">Freak</span>]] 17:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

542538 +++$+++ 23skidoo +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-02 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.154563860E09 +++$+++ You might not be aware that the anonymous editor you reverted at [[The Illuminatus! Trilogy]] has asked for an explanation of the revert on the [[Talk:The Illuminatus! Trilogy|talk page]]. Although the plot information seems sound from what I remember of the book, the anon shot himself in the foot by adding \"A lot more stuff happens etc etc\" which is my guess why you reverted it and I agree. Anyway, I thought I'd invite you to add your own 2 cents.  +++$+++ You might not be aware that the anonymous editor you reverted at [[The Illuminatus! Trilogy]] has asked for an explanation of the revert on the [[Talk:The Illuminatus! Trilogy|talk page]]. Although the plot information seems sound from what I remember of the book, the anon shot himself in the foot by adding "A lot more stuff happens etc etc" which is my guess why you reverted it and I agree. Anyway, I thought I'd invite you to add your own 2 cents. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 17:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
542539 +++$+++ 23skidoo +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542538 +++$+++ 542538 +++$+++ 2006-08-02 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.154565240E09 +++$+++ No worries. What's strange is the anon gives a pretty good argument in support of his\/her edits, but then you see him\/her making a smart-aleck remark in the article. Oh well. I last read the books about 5 years ago and I remember a few of the points in the summary, such as \"The Mgt\" and the like, but as I said on the talk page, the anon did call the accuracy of the information into question with that last line. Amazing what a few words can do.  +++$+++ : No worries. What's strange is the anon gives a pretty good argument in support of his/her edits, but then you see him/her making a smart-aleck remark in the article. Oh well. I last read the books about 5 years ago and I remember a few of the points in the summary, such as "The Mgt" and the like, but as I said on the talk page, the anon did call the accuracy of the information into question with that last line. Amazing what a few words can do. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 17:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

280395 +++$+++ RTG +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-23 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.266996180E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul. Thanks for changing the title of my request for clarification. In fact you changed it from a correct title to an incorrect title. You are not the first to try the same change so I have changed it back and noted in big letters now. Do you think that it would be clear now with the big letters because the change you and one other editor made... it definitely wasn't correct? Thanks. <font size=\"2\" face=\"Impact\">~  +++$+++ Hi Paul. Thanks for changing the title of my request for clarification. In fact you changed it from a correct title to an incorrect title. You are not the first to try the same change so I have changed it back and noted in big letters now. Do you think that it would be clear now with the big letters because the change you and one other editor made... it definitely wasn't correct? Thanks. <font size="2" face="Impact">~ [[User:RTG|R]].[[User_Talk:RTG|T]].[[Special:Contributions/RTG|G]]</font> 23:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
280396 +++$+++ RTG +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280395 +++$+++ 280395 +++$+++ 2010-02-25 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.267135560E09 +++$+++ I have replied to you on my talk page. <font size=\"2\" face=\"Impact\">~  +++$+++ :I have replied to you on my talk page. <font size="2" face="Impact">~ [[User:RTG|R]].[[User_Talk:RTG|T]].[[Special:Contributions/RTG|G]]</font> 14:06, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

18254 +++$+++ Brammers +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-30 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.312065660E09 +++$+++ Hi Peter. Just a quick message to say two things: firstly, your work on British churches is fantastic. Many are wonderful buildings and I'm sure that the articles you write make readers appreciate their local heritage much more. Secondly, if you are after any internal\/external photos of churches in the area around [[Colchester]], north-east Essex or [[Babergh]] then just let me know. I occasionally mill around there on my bike when I'm not at uni, so I could grab photos the next time I'm nearby and upload them to Commons. Regards,  +++$+++ Hi Peter. Just a quick message to say two things: firstly, your work on British churches is fantastic. Many are wonderful buildings and I'm sure that the articles you write make readers appreciate their local heritage much more. Secondly, if you are after any internal/external photos of churches in the area around [[Colchester]], north-east Essex or [[Babergh]] then just let me know. I occasionally mill around there on my bike when I'm not at uni, so I could grab photos the next time I'm nearby and upload them to Commons. Regards, [[User:Brammers|Brammers]] ([[User_talk:Brammers|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Brammers|c]]) 15:41, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
18255 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18254 +++$+++ 18254 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.312071120E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I really appreciate your comments.  Re photos: what I suggest is (1) if you see an article without a photo (or not a very good one), please add it to the article: (2) if you see or hear of a church that looks or sounds interesting, take photos, upload them to Commons, and then they are there for any editor to use in the future.  Multiple photos on Commons are fine; they can't all be used in a WP article (galleries are \"frowned on\"), but a link in the article to Commons makes them available to the reader.  Cheers.  -- +++$+++ :Thanks, I really appreciate your comments.  Re photos: what I suggest is (1) if you see an article without a photo (or not a very good one), please add it to the article: (2) if you see or hear of a church that looks or sounds interesting, take photos, upload them to Commons, and then they are there for any editor to use in the future.  Multiple photos on Commons are fine; they can't all be used in a WP article (galleries are "frowned on"), but a link in the article to Commons makes them available to the reader.  Cheers.  --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 17:12, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

46733 +++$+++ Metropolitan90 +++$+++ Daniel Christensen +++$+++ 46733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-06 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.265510160E09 +++$+++ Someone has tagged [[User:Backup1]] for deletion. If this is your secondary account and you wish to have it kept, I recommend you explain that at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion\/User:Backup1]]. If it is not your secondary account, then I apologize for associating you with it and you should please ignore this message. -- +++$+++ Someone has tagged [[User:Backup1]] for deletion. If this is your secondary account and you wish to have it kept, I recommend you explain that at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Backup1]]. If it is not your secondary account, then I apologize for associating you with it and you should please ignore this message. --[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] [[User talk:Metropolitan90|(talk)]] 18:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
46734 +++$+++ Daniel Christensen +++$+++ Daniel Christensen +++$+++ 46733 +++$+++ 46733 +++$+++ 2010-02-06 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.265518020E09 +++$+++ Delete it I can't even sign in to it. I forgot the password.  +++$+++ :Delete it I can't even sign in to it. I forgot the password. [[User:Daniel Christensen|Daniel Christensen]] ([[User talk:Daniel Christensen#top|talk]]) 20:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

18256 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.312118460E09 +++$+++ Vegaswikian has pointed me to a discussion he's getting underway at [[Wikipedia talk:Categorization#Sorting of churches]]. I think as long as everyone is doing the same thing, and any exceptions to the general rule (whatever that is) are agreed, it doesn't particularly matter much.  +++$+++ Vegaswikian has pointed me to a discussion he's getting underway at [[Wikipedia talk:Categorization#Sorting of churches]]. I think as long as everyone is doing the same thing, and any exceptions to the general rule (whatever that is) are agreed, it doesn't particularly matter much. [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 06:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
18257 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18256 +++$+++ 18256 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.312141680E09 +++$+++ I agree that there has to be consistency, and I guess it will turn out the way that Vegaswikian wants.  But when you get a category like [[:Category:Churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust]], with over 300 inhabitants, there's going to be an awful lot under \"S\", which to me does not seem to be particularly helpful. -- +++$+++ :I agree that there has to be consistency, and I guess it will turn out the way that Vegaswikian wants.  But when you get a category like [[:Category:Churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust]], with over 300 inhabitants, there's going to be an awful lot under "S", which to me does not seem to be particularly helpful. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 12:48, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

483640 +++$+++ StarLight +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.193274540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:StarLight|StarLight]] 18:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
483641 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483640 +++$+++ 483640 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.193274780E09 +++$+++ It sounds like you need to take a good read through [[WP:N]].  Then ask yourself if you can find objective 3rd-party sources to verify the site's notability.  \u2014 +++$+++ :It sounds like you need to take a good read through [[WP:N]].  Then ask yourself if you can find objective 3rd-party sources to verify the site's notability.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 18:13, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

280402 +++$+++ Logic Historian +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-06 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.267898640E09 +++$+++ Can I please be left in peace with the present account to complete this work.  'History of logic' is a flagship article for Wikipedia, and is an argument against those enemies who claim that nothing serious can ever be accomplished by the project\".   +++$+++ Can I please be left in peace with the present account to complete this work.  'History of logic' is a flagship article for Wikipedia, and is an argument against those enemies who claim that nothing serious can ever be accomplished by the project".  [[User:Logic Historian|Logic Historian]] ([[User talk:Logic Historian|talk]]) 10:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
280403 +++$+++ Chillum +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280402 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-06 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.267941240E09 +++$+++ '''Note''': This user has been blocked for ban evasion.  +++$+++ :* '''Note''': This user has been blocked for ban evasion. [[User:Chillum|Chillum]]<small> <sup>(Need help? [[User_talk:Chillum|Ask me]])</sup></small> 21:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
280404 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280402 +++$+++ 280402 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.267963500E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I hadn't noticed that discussion.  +++$+++ :Thanks, I hadn't noticed that discussion. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 04:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

18260 +++$+++ Ng.j +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.312509780E09 +++$+++ {{Hospitals_Invite}}  +++$+++ {{Hospitals_Invite}} [[User:Ng.j|Ng.j]] ([[User talk:Ng.j|talk]]) 19:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
18261 +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ Peter I. Vardy +++$+++ 18260 +++$+++ 18260 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312510200E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but too much going on in other projects just now. -- +++$+++ :Thanks, but too much going on in other projects just now. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy#top|talk]]) 19:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

280405 +++$+++ Wikiklrsc +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280405 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-07 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.267954260E09 +++$+++ Another query for an opinion, Paul. [[Special:Contributions\/Indike001]] seems to have summarized without citations? See [[Works and Days]], for one of many examples and the addition of the \"subjects\" section. Thoughts? -- if you have time. Is it OR or on the up and up? Best wishes and many thanks in advance. --- (Bob)  +++$+++ Another query for an opinion, Paul. [[Special:Contributions/Indike001]] seems to have summarized without citations? See [[Works and Days]], for one of many examples and the addition of the "subjects" section. Thoughts? -- if you have time. Is it OR or on the up and up? Best wishes and many thanks in advance. --- (Bob) [[User:Wikiklrsc|Wikiklrsc]] ([[User talk:Wikiklrsc|talk]]) 01:31, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
280406 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280405 +++$+++ 280405 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.267956180E09 +++$+++ I'll take a look later.  +++$+++ :I'll take a look later. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
280407 +++$+++ Wikiklrsc +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280405 +++$+++ 280406 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.267956540E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Paul, any time you have would be appreciated. Best wishes. --- (Bob)  +++$+++ ::Thanks, Paul, any time you have would be appreciated. Best wishes. --- (Bob) [[User:Wikiklrsc|Wikiklrsc]] ([[User talk:Wikiklrsc|talk]]) 02:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

542551 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542551 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-17 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.155806700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''(contribs)''</font>]]</sup> 02:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
542552 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542551 +++$+++ 542551 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.155901620E09 +++$+++ Ah ok, well you'll need to take up those edits with the editor who reverted them in that case. If you look through the articles history it'll have your IP and the user name or IP of the reverting editor. Hope that helps. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Ah ok, well you'll need to take up those edits with the editor who reverted them in that case. If you look through the articles history it'll have your IP and the user name or IP of the reverting editor. Hope that helps. Cheers. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''(contribs)''</font>]]</sup> 04:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

18266 +++$+++ Jrcrin001 +++$+++ Dpaajones +++$+++ 18266 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-26 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.288157760E09 +++$+++ {{talkback|Jrcrin001|Town Clerk of London}}  +++$+++ {{talkback|Jrcrin001|Town Clerk of London}} [[User:Jrcrin001|Jrcrin001]] ([[User talk:Jrcrin001|talk]]) 22:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
18267 +++$+++ Jrcrin001 +++$+++ Dpaajones +++$+++ 18266 +++$+++ 18266 +++$+++ 2010-10-26 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.288158420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your insight and help!  +++$+++ :Thanks for your insight and help! [[User:Jrcrin001|Jrcrin001]] ([[User talk:Jrcrin001|talk]]) 22:47, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

46735 +++$+++ DASHBot +++$+++ Daniel Christensen +++$+++ 46735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-07 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.265608380E09 +++$+++ Thank you, --  +++$+++ Thank you, -- [[User:DASHBot|DASHBot]] ([[User talk:DASHBot|talk]]) 21:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
46736 +++$+++ Tim1357 +++$+++ Daniel Christensen +++$+++ 46735 +++$+++ 46735 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.265627100E09 +++$+++ Hey there, I saw you turned off the bot. Do you think the bot acted in error? Do you think its function could be impoved?  +++$+++ :Hey there, I saw you turned off the bot. Do you think the bot acted in error? Do you think its function could be impoved? [[User:Tim1357|Tim1357]] ([[User talk:Tim1357|talk]]) 03:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
46737 +++$+++ Daniel Christensen +++$+++ Daniel Christensen +++$+++ 46735 +++$+++ 46736 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.265655000E09 +++$+++ No I just want that non-free image in my user-space.  +++$+++ ::No I just want that non-free image in my user-space. [[User:Daniel Christensen|Daniel Christensen]] ([[User talk:Daniel Christensen#top|talk]]) 10:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
46738 +++$+++ Hammersoft +++$+++ Daniel Christensen +++$+++ 46735 +++$+++ 46737 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.265666340E09 +++$+++ You can't, per [[WP:NFCC]] #9. The use of air use images outside of the main article namespace is not permitted. I've reverted your re-addition of this content to your userpage, and turned the bot back on. -- +++$+++ ::*You can't, per [[WP:NFCC]] #9. The use of air use images outside of the main article namespace is not permitted. I've reverted your re-addition of this content to your userpage, and turned the bot back on. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 13:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

18269 +++$+++ MrGRA +++$+++ Dpaajones +++$+++ 18269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-20 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.292875860E09 +++$+++ Any input or opinion you can offer to the discussion linked to (also to the status of the RN as a BW navy) will be immensely valuable, thanks for your time.  +++$+++ Any input or opinion you can offer to the discussion linked to (also to the status of the RN as a BW navy) will be immensely valuable, thanks for your time. [[User:MrGRA|G.R. Allison]] ([[User talk:MrGRA|talk]]) 12:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
18270 +++$+++ MrGRA +++$+++ Dpaajones +++$+++ 18269 +++$+++ 18269 +++$+++ 2010-12-31 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.293840780E09 +++$+++ Bcs09 seems to be starting trouble again on both the BW Navy talk page and Indian navy article. I would appreciate your opinion.  +++$+++ :Bcs09 seems to be starting trouble again on both the BW Navy talk page and Indian navy article. I would appreciate your opinion. [[User:MrGRA|G.R. Allison]] ([[User talk:MrGRA|talk]]) 16:13, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
18271 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Dpaajones +++$+++ 18269 +++$+++ 18269 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.296012900E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing![[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  19:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

18273 +++$+++ Simply south +++$+++ Dpaajones +++$+++ 18273 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-27 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.298846640E09 +++$+++ I hope it is okay, i've submitted this for DYK. [[User:Simply south|Simply]][[User talk:Simply south| south]].... +++$+++ I hope it is okay, i've submitted this for DYK. [[User:Simply south|Simply]][[User talk:Simply south| south]]....[[User:Simply south/Poem|..]] 14:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
18274 +++$+++ Simply south +++$+++ Dpaajones +++$+++ 18273 +++$+++ 18273 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.298856900E09 +++$+++ I've just seen some new photos that have strangely been uploaded. Any of them useful? [[:File:Yew Tree Cottage - geograph.org.uk - 1238206.jpg]], [[:File:Merrythought Factory, Coalbrookdale - geograph.org.uk - 1160591.jpg]] (not the best of quality) and [[:File:Teddy Fence, Coalbrookdale - geograph.org.uk - 1160588.jpg]] (probably a slighter better shot of the ralings). [[User:Simply south|Simply]][[User talk:Simply south| south]].... +++$+++ :I've just seen some new photos that have strangely been uploaded. Any of them useful? [[:File:Yew Tree Cottage - geograph.org.uk - 1238206.jpg]], [[:File:Merrythought Factory, Coalbrookdale - geograph.org.uk - 1160591.jpg]] (not the best of quality) and [[:File:Teddy Fence, Coalbrookdale - geograph.org.uk - 1160588.jpg]] (probably a slighter better shot of the ralings). [[User:Simply south|Simply]][[User talk:Simply south| south]]....[[User:Simply south/Poem|..]] 17:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
18275 +++$+++ Simply south +++$+++ Dpaajones +++$+++ 18273 +++$+++ 18274 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.298860140E09 +++$+++ Then again, the one of the factory if shrunk should come out well. And probably the cottage has no relevance other than being nearby. [[User:Simply south|Simply]][[User talk:Simply south| south]].... +++$+++ ::Then again, the one of the factory if shrunk should come out well. And probably the cottage has no relevance other than being nearby. [[User:Simply south|Simply]][[User talk:Simply south| south]]....[[User:Simply south/Poem|..]] 18:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
18276 +++$+++ Simply south +++$+++ Dpaajones +++$+++ 18273 +++$+++ 18275 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.298871960E09 +++$+++ I'll probably unlink it. Actually i did discover some old uni photos i'd taken of Ironbridge but they don't cover Merrythought. And i don't think i'll write an article on that, or if i do not for a while. I really must get my act together and do my article on <s>a famous cat and<\/s> an iconic London landmark which both do not have proper articles yet. [[User:Simply south|Simply]][[User talk:Simply south| south]].... +++$+++ :::I'll probably unlink it. Actually i did discover some old uni photos i'd taken of Ironbridge but they don't cover Merrythought. And i don't think i'll write an article on that, or if i do not for a while. I really must get my act together and do my article on <s>a famous cat and</s> an iconic London landmark which both do not have proper articles yet. [[User:Simply south|Simply]][[User talk:Simply south| south]]....[[User:Simply south/Poem|..]] 21:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

280418 +++$+++ RepublicanJacobite +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-10 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.268257200E09 +++$+++ If you have a moment, can you answer a question?  Does [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Raymond_Chandler_bibliography&action=edit&redlink=1 this] make any sense?  How can a bot delete an article talk page?  I have never heard of such a thing. ---<font face=\"Georgia\">''' +++$+++ If you have a moment, can you answer a question?  Does [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Raymond_Chandler_bibliography&action=edit&redlink=1 this] make any sense?  How can a bot delete an article talk page?  I have never heard of such a thing. ---<font face="Georgia">'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]'''<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 13:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
280419 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280418 +++$+++ 280418 +++$+++ 2010-03-10 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.268257800E09 +++$+++ See the page [[User:WildBot]], and in particular the section [[User:WildBot#Why does WildBot want my article deleted?|Why does WildBot want my article deleted?]].  Does that make sense?  +++$+++ :See the page [[User:WildBot]], and in particular the section [[User:WildBot#Why does WildBot want my article deleted?|Why does WildBot want my article deleted?]].  Does that make sense? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 13:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
280420 +++$+++ RepublicanJacobite +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280418 +++$+++ 280419 +++$+++ 2010-03-10 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.268258160E09 +++$+++ That makes perfect sense.  Thank you. ---<font face=\"Georgia\">''' +++$+++ ::That makes perfect sense.  Thank you. ---<font face="Georgia">'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]'''<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 13:56, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

614715 +++$+++ 82.182.82.20 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614715 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-30 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.130682000E09 +++$+++ Why think you that previous image of Vista Logo not is passed?  +++$+++ Why think you that previous image of Vista Logo not is passed? [[User:82.182.82.20|82.182.82.20]] 06:20, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
614716 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614715 +++$+++ 614715 +++$+++ 2005-10-30 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.130682300E09 +++$+++ Because the PNG image allows alphablending.  +++$+++ :Because the PNG image allows alphablending. [[User:Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]] 06:25, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

542564 +++$+++ JNermn +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-26 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.156593660E09 +++$+++ What's [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=C&diff=71932474&oldid=71810927 this]? There wasn't a 68.214.87.239 editing that page. You made the page into an article about C++, even though there's a page called \"C programming language.\" I don't see how this could be an honest mistake.-- +++$+++ What's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=C&diff=71932474&oldid=71810927 this]? There wasn't a 68.214.87.239 editing that page. You made the page into an article about C++, even though there's a page called "C programming language." I don't see how this could be an honest mistake.--[[User:JNermn|JNermn]] 05:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
542565 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542564 +++$+++ 542564 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.156594020E09 +++$+++ That's really strange, I don't know how that happened... Looking at the Ips historys he did make an edit here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=C%2B%2B&diff=71932500&oldid=71932406]to C++ Which I tried to revert. I guess somehow Vandalproof somehow took the + signs out of the title of the article and moved the attempted revert to C. It wasnt my intent to move the article to the wrong place. Sorry for the error, whether it was mine or the software.  +++$+++ :That's really strange, I don't know how that happened... Looking at the Ips historys he did make an edit here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=C%2B%2B&diff=71932500&oldid=71932406]to C++ Which I tried to revert. I guess somehow Vandalproof somehow took the + signs out of the title of the article and moved the attempted revert to C. It wasnt my intent to move the article to the wrong place. Sorry for the error, whether it was mine or the software. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''(contribs)''</font>]]</sup> 05:07, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

280421 +++$+++ From the other side +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-14 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.268595300E09 +++$+++ The FAC is going well but the section on post-war developments needs some help.  As I have said, I am not an expert on modern logic at all.  Is it true that there was a period of consolidation after WWII?  Was forcing the only result of significance?  Do we mention 'reverse mathematics'?  Help needed!!!  +++$+++ The FAC is going well but the section on post-war developments needs some help.  As I have said, I am not an expert on modern logic at all.  Is it true that there was a period of consolidation after WWII?  Was forcing the only result of significance?  Do we mention 'reverse mathematics'?  Help needed!!! [[User:From the other side|From the other side]] ([[User talk:From the other side|talk]]) 12:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
280422 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280421 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.268604780E09 +++$+++ I don't know much about this, I'd have to do some reasearch. Have you asked [[user:chalst|Charles Stewart]]? [[user:CBM|CBM]] and [[user:Trovatore|Trovatore]] might know something. I can ask them and also post a note at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics|mathematics project]] for you.  +++$+++ ::I don't know much about this, I'd have to do some reasearch. Have you asked [[user:chalst|Charles Stewart]]? [[user:CBM|CBM]] and [[user:Trovatore|Trovatore]] might know something. I can ask them and also post a note at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics|mathematics project]] for you. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
280423 +++$+++ From the other side +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280421 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.268607180E09 +++$+++ I have already asked Charles but he away right now.  If you could notify the others, yes please.  Thank you.   +++$+++ :::I have already asked Charles but he away right now.  If you could notify the others, yes please.  Thank you.  [[User:From the other side|From the other side]] ([[User talk:From the other side|talk]]) 15:53, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
280424 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280421 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.268608140E09 +++$+++ I've asked Carl and Trovatore and posted a general query [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Help with History of Logic?|here]].  +++$+++ ::::I've asked Carl and Trovatore and posted a general query [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Help with History of Logic?|here]]. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:09, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
280425 +++$+++ From the other side +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280421 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.268609040E09 +++$+++ :o)     +++$+++ ::::: :o)    [[User:From the other side|From the other side]] ([[User talk:From the other side|talk]]) 16:24, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

542566 +++$+++ 1568 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-26 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.156594200E09 +++$+++ Don't worry, we all make mistakes.  =) -- +++$+++ Don't worry, we all make mistakes.  =) --[[User:1568|1568]] 05:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
542567 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542566 +++$+++ 542566 +++$+++ 2006-08-27 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.156668840E09 +++$+++ Apology Accepted  +++$+++ :Apology Accepted [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''(contribs)''</font>]]</sup> 01:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

611053 +++$+++ Regancy42 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-05 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.275772920E09 +++$+++ Are you allowed to remove the AFD in this situation? I wasn't sure. - +++$+++ Are you allowed to remove the AFD in this situation? I wasn't sure. -[[User:Regancy42|Regancy42]] ([[User talk:Regancy42|talk]]) 14:22, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
611054 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ Ktr101 +++$+++ 611053 +++$+++ 611053 +++$+++ 2010-06-05 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.275773160E09 +++$+++ Well in eight minutes, it wasn't created so I was just assuming it was incorrectly added. I see that it was fixed now, so I guess I was wrong.  +++$+++ :Well in eight minutes, it wasn't created so I was just assuming it was incorrectly added. I see that it was fixed now, so I guess I was wrong. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 14:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

542568 +++$+++ gwernol +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-27 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.156679640E09 +++$+++ Hey, no problem. Thanks for being out there fighting the good fight against the vandals. Best,  +++$+++ Hey, no problem. Thanks for being out there fighting the good fight against the vandals. Best, [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 04:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
542569 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542568 +++$+++ 542568 +++$+++ 2006-08-27 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.156721460E09 +++$+++ No problem we all do stupid things sometimes, if you need any help learning how to contribute to Wikipedia feel free to ask any questions you have. +++$+++ :No problem we all do stupid things sometimes, if you need any help learning how to contribute to Wikipedia feel free to ask any questions you have.[[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''(contribs)''</font>]]</sup> 16:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

280426 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-19 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.269022020E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to point out that {{tl|fn}} and {{tl|fnb}} are up for deletion and no longer work. You may want to update your sub-page. Cheers.  +++$+++ Just wanted to point out that {{tl|fn}} and {{tl|fnb}} are up for deletion and no longer work. You may want to update your sub-page. Cheers. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|something]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|lame]] from CBW 11:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
280427 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280426 +++$+++ 280426 +++$+++ 2010-03-19 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.269022260E09 +++$+++ Which sub-page would that be?  +++$+++ :Which sub-page would that be? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 11:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
280428 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280426 +++$+++ 280427 +++$+++ 2010-03-19 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.269022440E09 +++$+++ Never mind I see now.  +++$+++ ::Never mind I see now. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 11:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

280429 +++$+++ Tanthalas39 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-01 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.270176360E09 +++$+++ \"Typically\" being the salient point. Nice bureaucratic edge, there. Funny you had to block an IP pretty much immediately.  +++$+++ "Typically" being the salient point. Nice bureaucratic edge, there. Funny you had to block an IP pretty much immediately. [[User:Tanthalas39|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">'''Tan'''</font>]]  &#124;  [[User talk:Tanthalas39|<font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">39</font>]] 19:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
280430 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.270176540E09 +++$+++ Yes I blocked an IP (I wouldn't say that I ''had'' to though).  +++$+++ :Yes I blocked an IP (I wouldn't say that I ''had'' to though). [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 19:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
280431 +++$+++ Tanthalas39 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 280430 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.270176720E09 +++$+++ Thank you for consulting me before redacting my admin action. As a courtesy, I'm informing you that I'm going to re-protect it.  +++$+++ ::Thank you for consulting me before redacting my admin action. As a courtesy, I'm informing you that I'm going to re-protect it. [[User:Tanthalas39|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">'''Tan'''</font>]]  &#124;  [[User talk:Tanthalas39|<font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">39</font>]] 19:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
280432 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 280431 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.270177320E09 +++$+++ Sorry that I didn't leave a note on your talk page. But you really shouldn't reprotect the article, consensus and standard practice has been that Main Page articles should not be protected, except in the rarest of circumstances. Have you seen  [[Wikipedia:Main Page featured article protection]]?  +++$+++ :::Sorry that I didn't leave a note on your talk page. But you really shouldn't reprotect the article, consensus and standard practice has been that Main Page articles should not be protected, except in the rarest of circumstances. Have you seen  [[Wikipedia:Main Page featured article protection]]? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:02, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
280433 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.270177680E09 +++$+++ Hi Paul, I've reprotected the article. You're correct in that TFAs are usually unprotected; however, this article is obviously very popular and subject to particularly severe vandalism. I've thus protected it for six hours, until it's off the MP. Cheers, &ndash;''' +++$+++ :Hi Paul, I've reprotected the article. You're correct in that TFAs are usually unprotected; however, this article is obviously very popular and subject to particularly severe vandalism. I've thus protected it for six hours, until it's off the MP. Cheers, &ndash;'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 20:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
280434 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 280431 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.270178880E09 +++$+++ I apologize (again) for not  attempting to consult with you. As for the issue of TFA protection, I've been following this issue for six years. Quoting from [[Wikipedia:Main Page featured article protection]]: \"Administrators only semi-protect the page as a response to extreme levels of vandalism\" and \"The Main Page featured article is rarely semi-protected. However, there are some extreme circumstances in which semi-protection is appropriate\". I drew on those two sentences for my \"rarest of circumstances\" characterization.  +++$+++ ::: I apologize (again) for not  attempting to consult with you. As for the issue of TFA protection, I've been following this issue for six years. Quoting from [[Wikipedia:Main Page featured article protection]]: "Administrators only semi-protect the page as a response to extreme levels of vandalism" and "The Main Page featured article is rarely semi-protected. However, there are some extreme circumstances in which semi-protection is appropriate". I drew on those two sentences for my "rarest of circumstances" characterization. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
280435 +++$+++ Tanthalas39 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 280434 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.270179300E09 +++$+++ Apology accepted. Frankly, you are out of touch with the current climate of protection consensus. What \"issue\" have you been following for six years? The evolution of a disputed and possibly outdated guideline? I don't see any participation on your part on either the main page or talk page, and given the handful of edits a year to it, \"following it\" must be a roundly stultifying endeavor. Strictly adhering to a guideline, when ''policies'' aren't even binding on this site (see [[WP:IAR]]) isn't a good practice.  +++$+++ ::::Apology accepted. Frankly, you are out of touch with the current climate of protection consensus. What "issue" have you been following for six years? The evolution of a disputed and possibly outdated guideline? I don't see any participation on your part on either the main page or talk page, and given the handful of edits a year to it, "following it" must be a roundly stultifying endeavor. Strictly adhering to a guideline, when ''policies'' aren't even binding on this site (see [[WP:IAR]]) isn't a good practice. [[User:Tanthalas39|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">'''Tan'''</font>]]  &#124;  [[User talk:Tanthalas39|<font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">39</font>]] 20:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
280436 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 280435 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.270179660E09 +++$+++ Well perhaps I am \"out of touch\".  Can you please point me to where a new consensus has formed on this issue?  +++$+++ :::::Well perhaps I am "out of touch".  Can you please point me to where a new consensus has formed on this issue? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
280437 +++$+++ Tanthalas39 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 280436 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.270179720E09 +++$+++ I sure can. Follow [[WP:RFPP]] for the next year or so.  +++$+++ ::::::I sure can. Follow [[WP:RFPP]] for the next year or so. [[User:Tanthalas39|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">'''Tan'''</font>]]  &#124;  [[User talk:Tanthalas39|<font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">39</font>]] 20:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
280438 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 280437 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.270180500E09 +++$+++ I was hoping for some past discussion.  +++$+++ :::::::I was hoping for some past discussion. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
280439 +++$+++ Tanthalas39 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 280438 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.270181280E09 +++$+++ There's isn't one that I know of. Look, I have utmost respect for you. In most measurements, you're a \"better\" Wikipedian than I am - you do way more article editing and content work. I have utmost respect for that. If one of us left Wikipedia, it would be better for the project if ''I'' did. That said, when it comes to admin actions in the current environment - be careful overturning actions. Since 2005, you have protected exactly 8 articles. I have protected over a thousand, and much more recently (over the past two years). Climate in various Wiki arenas ebbs and flows, with interpretations of policies and guidelines changing as Wikipedia grows. In 2005, \"the encyclopedia anyone can edit\" was gospel. Now, not as much. Life here moves at about ten times the pace of the normal world, in terms of shifting priorities, consensuses, and overall texture. I'm not saying you can't go on your merry admin way - I'm saying be careful when you think another admin is wrong and you are right. However, that's probably enough rehashing; apology accepted, and I apologize for probably losing my temper.  +++$+++ ::::::::There's isn't one that I know of. Look, I have utmost respect for you. In most measurements, you're a "better" Wikipedian than I am - you do way more article editing and content work. I have utmost respect for that. If one of us left Wikipedia, it would be better for the project if ''I'' did. That said, when it comes to admin actions in the current environment - be careful overturning actions. Since 2005, you have protected exactly 8 articles. I have protected over a thousand, and much more recently (over the past two years). Climate in various Wiki arenas ebbs and flows, with interpretations of policies and guidelines changing as Wikipedia grows. In 2005, "the encyclopedia anyone can edit" was gospel. Now, not as much. Life here moves at about ten times the pace of the normal world, in terms of shifting priorities, consensuses, and overall texture. I'm not saying you can't go on your merry admin way - I'm saying be careful when you think another admin is wrong and you are right. However, that's probably enough rehashing; apology accepted, and I apologize for probably losing my temper. [[User:Tanthalas39|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">'''Tan'''</font>]]  &#124;  [[User talk:Tanthalas39|<font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">39</font>]] 21:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
280440 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 280439 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.270182060E09 +++$+++ I will take to heart your advice to be more careful. And I'm sorry that my unprotecting the article made you lose your temper. However you still have not convinced me that protecting the article [[wife selling]] is for the best, nor have you been able to show that [[Wikipedia:Main Page featured article protection]] no longer represents consensus or standard practice. You may be right about that but I have nothing with which to substantiate that.  +++$+++ :::::::::I will take to heart your advice to be more careful. And I'm sorry that my unprotecting the article made you lose your temper. However you still have not convinced me that protecting the article [[wife selling]] is for the best, nor have you been able to show that [[Wikipedia:Main Page featured article protection]] no longer represents consensus or standard practice. You may be right about that but I have nothing with which to substantiate that. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
280441 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 280429 +++$+++ 2010-04-06 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.270602780E09 +++$+++ Help how? Do you mean disambiguating links like this:[[Python]]?  +++$+++ :Help how? Do you mean disambiguating links like this:[[Python]]? [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:13, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

18287 +++$+++ Bidgee +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ 18287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-11 08:31:00 +++$+++ 1.268325060E09 +++$+++ I'll keep this brief as I'm currently busy and have been all week. Australia uses DD\/MM\/YYYY and not the American date format of MM\/DD\/YYYY, although a lot of online Australian media organisations use the American format due to the software they use which of cause has been designed and made in the US or a country which uses the US format.  +++$+++ I'll keep this brief as I'm currently busy and have been all week. Australia uses DD/MM/YYYY and not the American date format of MM/DD/YYYY, although a lot of online Australian media organisations use the American format due to the software they use which of cause has been designed and made in the US or a country which uses the US format. [[User:Bidgee|Bidgee]] ([[User talk:Bidgee|talk]]) 08:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
18288 +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ 18287 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-03-11 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.268325360E09 +++$+++ I'm not querying that in the slightest.  I agree that the dates should be in the dd\/mm\/yy format.  I'm querying your edit to change all the dates.  I agree with the purpose of it but it was still clearly in violation of the MOS.  Read the section I quote.  Just in case you do it again and someone isn't happy about it. <b><i> +++$+++ ::I'm not querying that in the slightest.  I agree that the dates should be in the dd/mm/yy format.  I'm querying your edit to change all the dates.  I agree with the purpose of it but it was still clearly in violation of the MOS.  Read the section I quote.  Just in case you do it again and someone isn't happy about it. <b><i>[[User:PageantUpdater|PageantUpdater]]<small>  [[User talk:PageantUpdater|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PageantUpdater|contribs]] </small></i></b> 08:36, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

262480 +++$+++ Miyagawa +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262480 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-16 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.300336020E09 +++$+++ Added a new map here: http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Official_Horse_States_with_Pending.svg which has the pending states added in yellow - that way you've still got the old version if you need it.  +++$+++ Added a new map here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Official_Horse_States_with_Pending.svg which has the pending states added in yellow - that way you've still got the old version if you need it. [[User:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">Miyagawa</font>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">(talk)</font>]] 21:27, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
262481 +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ Dana boomer +++$+++ 262480 +++$+++ 262480 +++$+++ 2011-03-17 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.300425060E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much!  +++$+++ :Thank you very much! [[User:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]] ([[User talk:Dana boomer#top|talk]]) 22:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

396264 +++$+++ MarcusBritish +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ 396264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.311087000E09 +++$+++ {{od}}Sorry, another small oddity that I can't find info on in the Help pages, if I may rack your brains? In the [[Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington]] article, down in the Categories list when editing, a number of the categories appear something like this: <code><nowiki>[[Category:Dukes of Wellington|101]]<\/nowiki><\/code>. I am having trouble figuring out what purpose the \"101\" sortkey serves. Can you please advise me - I don't want to edit anything I don't know about. Thanks again,  +++$+++ {{od}}Sorry, another small oddity that I can't find info on in the Help pages, if I may rack your brains? In the [[Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington]] article, down in the Categories list when editing, a number of the categories appear something like this: <code><nowiki>[[Category:Dukes of Wellington|101]]</nowiki></code>. I am having trouble figuring out what purpose the "101" sortkey serves. Can you please advise me - I don't want to edit anything I don't know about. Thanks again, [[User:MarcusBritish|<font color="navy">Ma</font><font color="red">&reg;&copy;</font><font color="navy">usBr</font><font color="red">iti</font><font color="navy">sh</font>''']]  ([[User talk:MarcusBritish|talk]]) 07:50, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
396265 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ 396264 +++$+++ 396264 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 09:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311092640E09 +++$+++ Someone - no idea who - has set up that sort key to force the various Dukes of Wellington to be listed in chronological rather than alphabetical order in the category listing at [[:Category:Dukes of Wellington]]. If you look at [[Arthur Wellesley, 2nd Duke of Wellington]] in the edit window this has <code><nowiki>[[Category:Dukes of Wellington|102]]<\/nowiki><\/code>, and [[Henry Wellesley, 6th Duke of Wellington]] has <code><nowiki>[[Category:Dukes of Wellington|106]]<\/nowiki><\/code> etc. Obviously the same goes for the other categories. I'm not sure why \"101\" would be preferable to \"01\", \"1\" or even a more intuitive \"1st\", but I assume whoever did it had their reasons.  +++$+++ :Someone - no idea who - has set up that sort key to force the various Dukes of Wellington to be listed in chronological rather than alphabetical order in the category listing at [[:Category:Dukes of Wellington]]. If you look at [[Arthur Wellesley, 2nd Duke of Wellington]] in the edit window this has <code><nowiki>[[Category:Dukes of Wellington|102]]</nowiki></code>, and [[Henry Wellesley, 6th Duke of Wellington]] has <code><nowiki>[[Category:Dukes of Wellington|106]]</nowiki></code> etc. Obviously the same goes for the other categories. I'm not sure why "101" would be preferable to "01", "1" or even a more intuitive "1st", but I assume whoever did it had their reasons. [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 09:24, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
396266 +++$+++ MarcusBritish +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ 396264 +++$+++ 396265 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311094260E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see. Makes sense now, thanks. <b> +++$+++ ::Ah, I see. Makes sense now, thanks. <b>[[User:MarcusBritish|<font color="#003399">Ma<font color="#CC0000">&reg;&copy;</font>usBr<font color="#CC0000">iti</font>sh</font>''']]&nbsp;<sup>[</sup><sup>[[User talk:MarcusBritish|talk]]]</sup></b> 09:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
396267 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ 396264 +++$+++ 396266 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 10:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311095160E09 +++$+++ Re FA, as I said it's not my intention to put you off. Most reviewers are helpful and constructive though there are some that can be difficult with, for example, nitpicks over the [[WP:MOS|Manual of Style]] and the like. The MoS is only a guideline... unless you want to pass FA review :) However, similar to milhist A-Class the closure and final decision is made by the FA delegates, and Sandy and Karanacs are pretty good at appropriately weighting review comments against the FA criteria. Articles with oppose comments still get promoted if the delegates feel the opposition is unreasonable, not actionable of whatever. In my view it's probably worth you trying FAC at least once before making a decision on whether or not to use the process again. However, I would be unhappy to see a good content editor put off contributing to Wikipedia by a difficult review, so I'm sure you'll make the right decision :)  +++$+++ :::Re FA, as I said it's not my intention to put you off. Most reviewers are helpful and constructive though there are some that can be difficult with, for example, nitpicks over the [[WP:MOS|Manual of Style]] and the like. The MoS is only a guideline... unless you want to pass FA review :) However, similar to milhist A-Class the closure and final decision is made by the FA delegates, and Sandy and Karanacs are pretty good at appropriately weighting review comments against the FA criteria. Articles with oppose comments still get promoted if the delegates feel the opposition is unreasonable, not actionable of whatever. In my view it's probably worth you trying FAC at least once before making a decision on whether or not to use the process again. However, I would be unhappy to see a good content editor put off contributing to Wikipedia by a difficult review, so I'm sure you'll make the right decision :) [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 10:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
396268 +++$+++ MarcusBritish +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ 396264 +++$+++ 396267 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.311096420E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'll look through those GA pages you linked and see what I think. There are currently 3 support votes for the Wellington battle record article, so once a coordinator takes a look at those (there have been some recommendations that I turned down, with good reason), I shall see what my next move for the article might be. I am awaiting feedback from Editor Review, also, based on my first 6 months here.. to help me decide what my options are, from an outside view. I'm not dedicated to any one particular project at the moment, it just happens that my main interest is history, but by no means do I want to limit myself to it, unless I feel it is my only strength. I might even consider a little time as a GA reviewer myself, given that I prefer unbiased feedback, and that GA covers all ground free of individual Project targets. I quite like the MoS, as it is, mostly, quite logical in its approach to handling content on this scale. I welcome your opinion. Thanks for the info! <b> +++$+++ ::::Okay, I'll look through those GA pages you linked and see what I think. There are currently 3 support votes for the Wellington battle record article, so once a coordinator takes a look at those (there have been some recommendations that I turned down, with good reason), I shall see what my next move for the article might be. I am awaiting feedback from Editor Review, also, based on my first 6 months here.. to help me decide what my options are, from an outside view. I'm not dedicated to any one particular project at the moment, it just happens that my main interest is history, but by no means do I want to limit myself to it, unless I feel it is my only strength. I might even consider a little time as a GA reviewer myself, given that I prefer unbiased feedback, and that GA covers all ground free of individual Project targets. I quite like the MoS, as it is, mostly, quite logical in its approach to handling content on this scale. I welcome your opinion. Thanks for the info! <b>[[User:MarcusBritish|<font color="#003399">Ma<font color="#CC0000">&reg;&copy;</font>usBr<font color="#CC0000">iti</font>sh</font>''']]&nbsp;<sup>[</sup><sup>[[User talk:MarcusBritish|talk]]]</sup></b> 10:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
396269 +++$+++ MarcusBritish +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ 396264 +++$+++ 396267 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.311097020E09 +++$+++ RE: ''\"maybe we could do with something like the latter for out A-Class process if there's a perception that over-assessing is an issue?\"'' - that sounds like a good idea, I think as Wiki grows, so should Project policies to handle the material, and contributors better. In essence, maturity of the project. Draft policies, followed by member input could lead to an improvement in the way things are handled fairly, and perhaps reduce the adversarial nature of some reviews. I left similar comments in a post on the Milhist Strategy page yesterday, based on lack of List-class ratings, about encouraging newbie contributors rather than making their efforts feel wasted. Regards, <b> +++$+++ ::::RE: ''"maybe we could do with something like the latter for out A-Class process if there's a perception that over-assessing is an issue?"'' - that sounds like a good idea, I think as Wiki grows, so should Project policies to handle the material, and contributors better. In essence, maturity of the project. Draft policies, followed by member input could lead to an improvement in the way things are handled fairly, and perhaps reduce the adversarial nature of some reviews. I left similar comments in a post on the Milhist Strategy page yesterday, based on lack of List-class ratings, about encouraging newbie contributors rather than making their efforts feel wasted. Regards, <b>[[User:MarcusBritish|<font color="#003399">Ma<font color="#CC0000">&reg;&copy;</font>usBr<font color="#CC0000">iti</font>sh</font>''']]&nbsp;<sup>[</sup><sup>[[User talk:MarcusBritish|talk]]]</sup></b> 10:37, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

542578 +++$+++ Kungfuadam +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-28 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.156815360E09 +++$+++ Hi, let me know when you get verified on IRC. I am not able to be on IRC until tonight. If you can't get verified by then, I can verify you if you're online.-- +++$+++ Hi, let me know when you get verified on IRC. I am not able to be on IRC until tonight. If you can't get verified by then, I can verify you if you're online.--[[User:Kungfuadam|<font color="Blue">Kungfu</font> <font color="Red">Adam</font>]] <sup>([[User_talk:Kungfuadam|<font color="Green">talk</font>]])</sup> 18:36, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
542579 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542578 +++$+++ 542578 +++$+++ 2006-08-28 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.156816680E09 +++$+++ It's not a question of whether I believe incest is good or not. Personally I find it disgusting, but while on Wikipedia I strive to maintain a [[WP:NPOV|Neutral Point of View]], which is one of the cornerstones of the Wikipedia Project. I encourage you to continue to contribute but to avoid adding personal opinions to articles.  +++$+++ :It's not a question of whether I believe incest is good or not. Personally I find it disgusting, but while on Wikipedia I strive to maintain a [[WP:NPOV|Neutral Point of View]], which is one of the cornerstones of the Wikipedia Project. I encourage you to continue to contribute but to avoid adding personal opinions to articles. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''(contribs)''</font>]]</sup> 18:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
542580 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542578 +++$+++ 542578 +++$+++ 2006-08-28 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.156817400E09 +++$+++ I see you left a message on the article's talk page, which is the correct thing to do if you feel something in the article is wrong. An editor much more farmiliar with the subject than me should comment on it shortly. Thanks +++$+++ :I see you left a message on the article's talk page, which is the correct thing to do if you feel something in the article is wrong. An editor much more farmiliar with the subject than me should comment on it shortly. Thanks[[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''(contribs)''</font>]]</sup> 19:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
542581 +++$+++ gwernol +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542578 +++$+++ 542578 +++$+++ 2006-08-28 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.156817460E09 +++$+++ I'd be happy to provide a third party opinion. I haven't edited the [[Incest]] article, nor read it until now. I'm afraid James, that you edit was correctly removed by Canadian-Bacon. At the very least you would need to [[WP:CITE|cite]] a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] for the assertion; for example the research you mention above. Presumably that's been written up in a peer reviewed scientific journal. If you can provide a link to that journal or conference article that confirms that \"Incest is sick and wrong. This is a fact.\" then you could include it. Otherwise its just your [[WP:POV|point of view]] and thus inappropriate for an encyclopedia article. I highly doubt the Encyclopedic Britannica entry on Incest says anything like your edit. Sorry,  +++$+++ :I'd be happy to provide a third party opinion. I haven't edited the [[Incest]] article, nor read it until now. I'm afraid James, that you edit was correctly removed by Canadian-Bacon. At the very least you would need to [[WP:CITE|cite]] a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] for the assertion; for example the research you mention above. Presumably that's been written up in a peer reviewed scientific journal. If you can provide a link to that journal or conference article that confirms that "Incest is sick and wrong. This is a fact." then you could include it. Otherwise its just your [[WP:POV|point of view]] and thus inappropriate for an encyclopedia article. I highly doubt the Encyclopedic Britannica entry on Incest says anything like your edit. Sorry, [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 19:11, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

18291 +++$+++ MissAmericaGirl +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ 18291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-06 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.278471000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:MissAmericaGirl|MissAmericaGirl]] ([[User talk:MissAmericaGirl|talk]]) 19:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
18292 +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ 18291 +++$+++ 18291 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.278489960E09 +++$+++ No problem, you weren't to know!  I'm sorry you got banned, glad that got sorted out :) <b><i> +++$+++ :No problem, you weren't to know!  I'm sorry you got banned, glad that got sorted out :) <b><i>[[User:PageantUpdater|PageantUpdater]]<small>  [[User talk:PageantUpdater|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PageantUpdater|contribs]] </small></i></b> 01:06, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

483646 +++$+++ The Transhumanist +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483646 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.193281740E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser\/CheckPage#Requests for registration]].  ''''' +++$+++ [[Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage#Requests for registration]].  '''''[[User:The Transhumanist|<font color="#880088">Th<font color="#0000FF">e Tr<font color="#449900">ans<font color="#DD9922">hu<font color="#DD4400">man<font color="#BB0000">ist</font> &nbsp;&nbsp;]]''''' 20:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
483647 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483646 +++$+++ 483646 +++$+++ 2007-10-25 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.193373660E09 +++$+++ I didn't lock [[Allie DiMeco]].  I locked [[Talk:Allie DiMeco]].  \u2014 +++$+++ :I didn't lock [[Allie DiMeco]].  I locked [[Talk:Allie DiMeco]].  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 21:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

542585 +++$+++ BVM +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-30 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.156954140E09 +++$+++ Can u help me with my pursuit to become an officer?  +++$+++ Can u help me with my pursuit to become an officer? [[User:BVM|BVM]] 09:09, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
542586 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542585 +++$+++ 542585 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.157009460E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately \"bastards\" does not accurately reflect the nature of America.  +++$+++ :Unfortunately "bastards" does not accurately reflect the nature of America. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''(contribs)''</font>]]</sup> 00:31, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

18298 +++$+++ MissAmericaGirl +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ 18298 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-31 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.283301120E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks for letting me know!! I wasn't aware of that. I will remove the American beauty pageant winner categories that I put up when I get a chance.  +++$+++ Ok, thanks for letting me know!! I wasn't aware of that. I will remove the American beauty pageant winner categories that I put up when I get a chance. [[User:MissAmericaGirl|MissAmericaGirl]] ([[User talk:MissAmericaGirl|talk]]) 17:32, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
18299 +++$+++ MissAmericaGirl +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ 18298 +++$+++ 18298 +++$+++ 2010-09-03 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.283573340E09 +++$+++ Ok. Thanks. I will just leave that category alone until we figure it out.  +++$+++ :Ok. Thanks. I will just leave that category alone until we figure it out. [[User:MissAmericaGirl|MissAmericaGirl]] ([[User talk:MissAmericaGirl|talk]]) 21:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

542588 +++$+++  +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542588 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.157021640E09 +++$+++ Hi Canadian-Bacon. I was wondering if I could shamelessly steal your user page as a template for my own. Within a few days, I'll make mine unique. You user page has a lot of the features I'd like on my own page. Feel free to say no.  +++$+++ Hi Canadian-Bacon. I was wondering if I could shamelessly steal your user page as a template for my own. Within a few days, I'll make mine unique. You user page has a lot of the features I'd like on my own page. Feel free to say no. [[User:Fracture98|Fr<font style="position:relative;top:1px">ac</font><font style="position:relative;bottom:1px">tu</font>re]]<sup>[[User talk:Fracture98|Talk]]</sup>&nbsp;<span style="position:relative;bottom:2px">[[Image:Flag_of_Canada.svg|18px|]]</span>&nbsp; 03:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
542589 +++$+++  +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542588 +++$+++ 542588 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.157033640E09 +++$+++ Normally I would direct you to the [[Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit|Counter-Vandalism Unit]] but unfortunately many users feel that it should be taken down, and a formal discussion is being held about deleting it. If it is deleted there would be no more \"patrol\" so I can't really send you anywhere. Sorry for the inconveniance.  +++$+++ :Normally I would direct you to the [[Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit|Counter-Vandalism Unit]] but unfortunately many users feel that it should be taken down, and a formal discussion is being held about deleting it. If it is deleted there would be no more "patrol" so I can't really send you anywhere. Sorry for the inconveniance. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 07:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

542590 +++$+++ BVM +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.157034000E09 +++$+++ What will u do?  +++$+++ What will u do? [[User:BVM|BVM]] 07:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
542591 +++$+++  +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542590 +++$+++ 542590 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.157034060E09 +++$+++ I'll continue my work as normal with or without a specific patrol in charge. Things may be less coordinated but it's still an important job to get done.  +++$+++ :I'll continue my work as normal with or without a specific patrol in charge. Things may be less coordinated but it's still an important job to get done. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 07:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

280448 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280448 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-05 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.273125960E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=John_Vanbrugh&diff=360397413&oldid=360389569] = does this cite verify the asserted specific dates of birth\/death? -- ''' +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Vanbrugh&diff=360397413&oldid=360389569] = does this cite verify the asserted specific dates of birth/death? -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 23:06, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
280449 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280448 +++$+++ 280448 +++$+++ 2010-05-05 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.273126140E09 +++$+++ And\/or feel free to answer at [[Talk:John_Vanbrugh#Specific_dates_of_birth_and_death.3F]]. Cheers, -- ''' +++$+++ :And/or feel free to answer at [[Talk:John_Vanbrugh#Specific_dates_of_birth_and_death.3F]]. Cheers, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 23:09, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
280450 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280448 +++$+++ 280449 +++$+++ 2010-05-05 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.273127040E09 +++$+++ It simply gives the years (1664-1726).  +++$+++ ::It simply gives the years (1664-1726). [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 23:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
280451 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280448 +++$+++ 280450 +++$+++ 2010-05-05 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.273127280E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks very much. Removed the uncited portion of it, from the article. -- ''' +++$+++ :::Okay, thanks very much. Removed the uncited portion of it, from the article. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 23:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

483648 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483648 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-25 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.193381160E09 +++$+++ It's not so much being \"in favor\" of the DH as \"opposed to\" pitchers who swing the bat like my grandmother... or like [[Bob Buhl]], whose hitless season I suffered through as a teen (among other things being suffered through as a Cubs fan). I like offense, and there is nothing interesting about seeing the pitcher come up and strike out. A pitcher who can hit, though, is a joy to behold... because they are so rare. There are a lot more Bob Buhls out there than Babe Ruths or even Kerry Woods.  +++$+++ It's not so much being "in favor" of the DH as "opposed to" pitchers who swing the bat like my grandmother... or like [[Bob Buhl]], whose hitless season I suffered through as a teen (among other things being suffered through as a Cubs fan). I like offense, and there is nothing interesting about seeing the pitcher come up and strike out. A pitcher who can hit, though, is a joy to behold... because they are so rare. There are a lot more Bob Buhls out there than Babe Ruths or even Kerry Woods. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 23:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
483649 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483648 +++$+++ 483648 +++$+++ 2007-10-26 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.193384820E09 +++$+++ Then they should learn how to hit!  :)   Even as a kid I preferred watching [[Dwight Gooden]] and [[John Tudor]] duke it out for a 2-1 game than watch [[Dave Winfield]], [[Don Mattingly]], and the Yanks slug out 14 runs ''and lose''.  The 15-14 games were cute but a 2-1 nailbiter was ''real'' baseball - esp. if Gooden knocked a couple singles and scored one of the runs as he did from time to time.  (In his unstoppable year of '85, he hit .226 with 9 RBI to go along with his 24-4 record and 1.53 ERA. ''[[Rick James#Cocaine abuse|\"Cocaine is a hell of a drug!\"]]'')  \u2014 +++$+++ :Then they should learn how to hit!  :)   Even as a kid I preferred watching [[Dwight Gooden]] and [[John Tudor]] duke it out for a 2-1 game than watch [[Dave Winfield]], [[Don Mattingly]], and the Yanks slug out 14 runs ''and lose''.  The 15-14 games were cute but a 2-1 nailbiter was ''real'' baseball - esp. if Gooden knocked a couple singles and scored one of the runs as he did from time to time.  (In his unstoppable year of '85, he hit .226 with 9 RBI to go along with his 24-4 record and 1.53 ERA. ''[[Rick James#Cocaine abuse|"Cocaine is a hell of a drug!"]]'')  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 00:47, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
483650 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483648 +++$+++ 483649 +++$+++ 2007-10-26 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.193386800E09 +++$+++ Yes, they should. But they don't. The old theory was that having the pitcher hit was part of the NL strategy, expecially in late innings. But with pitchers only allowed to go to 100 pitches, that's much less important now. The one time I went to an opening day was in 1971, at Wrigley Field, about 40 degrees, and with the possibility of walk-up ticket purchases, which is another way times have changed. Jenkins and Gibson (both of whom could hit, though not that day) dueled for 10 innings and Billy Williams homered off Gibson for the winner.. in less than 2 hours, yet. [http:\/\/www.baseball-almanac.com\/box-scores\/boxscore.php?boxid=197104060CHN] That doesn't happen too often nowadays. 100 pitches and you're gone. Oh, and Joe Torre homered in that game, for the Cardinals. That was indeed a long time ago.  +++$+++ ::Yes, they should. But they don't. The old theory was that having the pitcher hit was part of the NL strategy, expecially in late innings. But with pitchers only allowed to go to 100 pitches, that's much less important now. The one time I went to an opening day was in 1971, at Wrigley Field, about 40 degrees, and with the possibility of walk-up ticket purchases, which is another way times have changed. Jenkins and Gibson (both of whom could hit, though not that day) dueled for 10 innings and Billy Williams homered off Gibson for the winner.. in less than 2 hours, yet. [http://www.baseball-almanac.com/box-scores/boxscore.php?boxid=197104060CHN] That doesn't happen too often nowadays. 100 pitches and you're gone. Oh, and Joe Torre homered in that game, for the Cardinals. That was indeed a long time ago. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 01:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

542595 +++$+++ gwernol +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542595 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-01 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.157104860E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. I wasn't entirely sure what it was either, but there seemed little chance it was adding anything of value to, well, anything. All the best,  +++$+++ You're welcome. I wasn't entirely sure what it was either, but there seemed little chance it was adding anything of value to, well, anything. All the best, [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 03:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
542596 +++$+++  +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542595 +++$+++ 542595 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.157110200E09 +++$+++ Hi I don't know exactly what it is you're asking me, care to explain what you're talking about and I'll be glad to help  +++$+++ :Hi I don't know exactly what it is you're asking me, care to explain what you're talking about and I'll be glad to help [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 04:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
542597 +++$+++  +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542595 +++$+++ 542595 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.157136420E09 +++$+++ In many cases schools use shared IPs for all their computers so chances are someone in the building other than you is responsible if you did nothing. The edits in question are here. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Culture_of_France&diff=prev&oldid=73171139], and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Culture_of_France&diff=prev&oldid=73167058] with the highlighted red letters on the left side being changes made by someone at the school. Cheers.  +++$+++ :In many cases schools use shared IPs for all their computers so chances are someone in the building other than you is responsible if you did nothing. The edits in question are here. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Culture_of_France&diff=prev&oldid=73171139], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Culture_of_France&diff=prev&oldid=73167058] with the highlighted red letters on the left side being changes made by someone at the school. Cheers. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 11:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

280452 +++$+++ RobHar +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-07 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.273278000E09 +++$+++ Hi. Was there any reason to remove the students you removed other than the fact that they were redlinks? Several of the removals were very well-established mathematicians who should have an article on wiki, but simply don't. Cheers.  +++$+++ Hi. Was there any reason to remove the students you removed other than the fact that they were redlinks? Several of the removals were very well-established mathematicians who should have an article on wiki, but simply don't. Cheers. [[User:RobHar|RobHar]] ([[User talk:RobHar|talk]]) 17:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
280453 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280452 +++$+++ 280452 +++$+++ 2010-05-08 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.273309920E09 +++$+++ Just that they were red links (which tends to indicate non-notability). Feel free to add them back if you think they deserve their own article.  +++$+++ :Just that they were red links (which tends to indicate non-notability). Feel free to add them back if you think they deserve their own article. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 02:12, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

280454 +++$+++ SQGibbon +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-09 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.273403880E09 +++$+++ Hey Paul, thanks for the correction on [[Uranus (mythology)]].  I read the damn thing at least five times and I just didn't see it. Now I understand why the other editor put replaced the semicolon with a comma.  Your parentheses make it clearer though.  +++$+++ Hey Paul, thanks for the correction on [[Uranus (mythology)]].  I read the damn thing at least five times and I just didn't see it. Now I understand why the other editor put replaced the semicolon with a comma.  Your parentheses make it clearer though. [[User:SQGibbon|SQGibbon]] ([[User talk:SQGibbon|talk]]) 04:18, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
280455 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280454 +++$+++ 280454 +++$+++ 2010-05-09 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.273431360E09 +++$+++ You're welcome.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 11:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

18311 +++$+++ MissPageantNews +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ 18311 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.310115180E09 +++$+++ Oh ok, it makes sense now! Someone reverted your original fix-up and removed a bunch of stuff, so I didn't know if it was still messed up and missing info. Sorry about that! Thanks for letting me know!  +++$+++ Oh ok, it makes sense now! Someone reverted your original fix-up and removed a bunch of stuff, so I didn't know if it was still messed up and missing info. Sorry about that! Thanks for letting me know! [[User:MissPageantNews|MissPageantNews]] ([[User talk:MissPageantNews|talk]]) 01:53, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
18312 +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ 18311 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.310115540E09 +++$+++ No problem!  Yes it did become a bit of a mess :) <b><i> +++$+++ ::No problem!  Yes it did become a bit of a mess :) <b><i>[[User:PageantUpdater|PageantUpdater]]<small>  [[User talk:PageantUpdater|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PageantUpdater|contribs]] </small></i></b> 01:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

280456 +++$+++ Edward130603 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280456 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-09 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.276139640E09 +++$+++ Just wondering, were the comments [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ATrojan_War&action=historysubmit&diff=367048482&oldid=367037962 here] deleted unintentionally? --''' +++$+++ Just wondering, were the comments [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ATrojan_War&action=historysubmit&diff=367048482&oldid=367037962 here] deleted unintentionally? --'''[[User:Edward130603|Edward130603]]''' ([[User talk:Edward130603|talk]]) 20:14, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
280457 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280456 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-06-09 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.276140480E09 +++$+++ Yes, apparently an unreported edit conflict. Thanks for telling me, I'll try to fix things.  +++$+++ ::Yes, apparently an unreported edit conflict. Thanks for telling me, I'll try to fix things. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

18313 +++$+++  +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ 18313 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.310633040E09 +++$+++ In terms of templates like {{tl|Big Four Pageants titleholders 2004}}, I have merely added a year to the general template name. I am open to page moves.  Are you going to move the rest of the templates at [[:Category:Grand Slam pageant winners by country templates]]?  I was just following the naming convention their.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ In terms of templates like {{tl|Big Four Pageants titleholders 2004}}, I have merely added a year to the general template name. I am open to page moves.  Are you going to move the rest of the templates at [[:Category:Grand Slam pageant winners by country templates]]?  I was just following the naming convention their.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 01:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
18314 +++$+++  +++$+++ PageantUpdater +++$+++ 18313 +++$+++ 18313 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.310636040E09 +++$+++ I moved all the templates I created that are in [[:Category:Big Four pageant templates]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ :I moved all the templates I created that are in [[:Category:Big Four pageant templates]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 02:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

280458 +++$+++ Bender235 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280458 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-05 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.278375060E09 +++$+++ Just for the record: do you oppose replacing <code><nowiki><references \/><\/nowiki><\/code> with <code>{{tl|Reflist}}<\/code> in this article? \u2014 +++$+++ Just for the record: do you oppose replacing <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code> with <code>{{tl|Reflist}}</code> in this article? —[[User:Bender235|bender235]] ([[User talk:Bender235|talk]]) 17:11, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
280459 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280458 +++$+++ 280458 +++$+++ 2010-07-05 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.278375660E09 +++$+++ No.  +++$+++ :No. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:21, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
280460 +++$+++ CBM +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280458 +++$+++ 280459 +++$+++ 2010-07-05 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.278375960E09 +++$+++ Some context: Bender235 has been going around large numbers of articles making this change via AWB. I noticed these edits when they overlapped with our math articles.  &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>( +++$+++ ::Some context: Bender235 has been going around large numbers of articles making this change via AWB. I noticed these edits when they overlapped with our math articles.  &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 17:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
280461 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280458 +++$+++ 280460 +++$+++ 2010-07-05 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.278376140E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :::Thanks. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 17:29, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

542603 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542603 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-03 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.157270940E09 +++$+++ But thought I'd ask you as you appear to have knowledge of Barrhaven.  What's the nearest hospital?  Queensway-Carleton or the Civic.  (I'm working on a business plan for a medical centre in Ottawa).  Is there an urgent care centre or some other hospital-equivalent around?  It's been almost 10 years since I've lived in Ottawa and I've forgotten somewhat.  Many thanks --  +++$+++ But thought I'd ask you as you appear to have knowledge of Barrhaven.  What's the nearest hospital?  Queensway-Carleton or the Civic.  (I'm working on a business plan for a medical centre in Ottawa).  Is there an urgent care centre or some other hospital-equivalent around?  It's been almost 10 years since I've lived in Ottawa and I've forgotten somewhat.  Many thanks -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|'''Samir''' ]]<small>[[User_talk:Samir_(The_Scope)|धर्म]]</small> 01:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
542604 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542603 +++$+++ 542603 +++$+++ 2006-09-03 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.157271180E09 +++$+++ Interesting.  I'm debating on whether to relocate my practice, and Barrhaven keeps on coming up as an option.  Thanks --  +++$+++ :Interesting.  I'm debating on whether to relocate my practice, and Barrhaven keeps on coming up as an option.  Thanks -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|'''Samir''' ]]<small>[[User_talk:Samir_(The_Scope)|धर्म]]</small> 01:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

280462 +++$+++ Alin (Public Policy) +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-05 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.278390780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Alin (Public Policy)|Alin (Public Policy)]] ([[User talk:Alin (Public Policy)|talk]]) 21:33, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
280463 +++$+++  +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280462 +++$+++ 280462 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I've sent you an email. Regards 17:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ :I've sent you an email. Regards 17:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

280465 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280465 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-28 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.280343360E09 +++$+++ When you get back, please look at the IP's recent edits adding Marduk, etc. Thanks.  +++$+++ When you get back, please look at the IP's recent edits adding Marduk, etc. Thanks. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 11:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
280466 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280465 +++$+++ 280465 +++$+++ 2010-08-07 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.281223680E09 +++$+++ Yes I misunderstood what was meant. Your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=0_%28number%29&action=historysubmit&diff=377585812&oldid=377582198 subsequent edit] is better. I'm not sure if it belongs in the lead, though. It seems a bit too technical at that point in the article.  +++$+++ :Yes I misunderstood what was meant. Your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=0_%28number%29&action=historysubmit&diff=377585812&oldid=377582198 subsequent edit] is better. I'm not sure if it belongs in the lead, though. It seems a bit too technical at that point in the article. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 16:28, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

280467 +++$+++ Cynwolfe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-10 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.281493920E09 +++$+++ Hey, Paul, I know you watch [[Persephone]] and guard against some of the worst impulses there, but I was wondering whether you had any thoughts on why this article attracts such capricious editing, or what sort of approach or reorganization might help. This is such a key figure for the mystery religions that in writing my obscure little articles on ancient religion I often have occasion to link there, but I always do so with reluctance. [[Eros]], as you know, is also a problem, and a pretty skimpy article at present.  +++$+++ Hey, Paul, I know you watch [[Persephone]] and guard against some of the worst impulses there, but I was wondering whether you had any thoughts on why this article attracts such capricious editing, or what sort of approach or reorganization might help. This is such a key figure for the mystery religions that in writing my obscure little articles on ancient religion I often have occasion to link there, but I always do so with reluctance. [[Eros]], as you know, is also a problem, and a pretty skimpy article at present. [[User:Cynwolfe|Cynwolfe]] ([[User talk:Cynwolfe|talk]]) 19:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
280468 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280467 +++$+++ 280467 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.281499740E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid that, off the top of my head, I can't think of anything particularly useful to say about any of this. I will say that I've seemed to  notice, over the last half-year or so, an increase in the number of low quality IP edits to many of our mythology articles (including the two you mention). Perhaps as a result of the Percy Jackson books and Clash of the Titans movie? But I'm sure you could do wonders for those two articles if you chose to be inspired (I might be willing to lend a hand) and it might be more fun and productive than fussing over some silly list of wars between democracies ;-)  +++$+++ :I'm afraid that, off the top of my head, I can't think of anything particularly useful to say about any of this. I will say that I've seemed to  notice, over the last half-year or so, an increase in the number of low quality IP edits to many of our mythology articles (including the two you mention). Perhaps as a result of the Percy Jackson books and Clash of the Titans movie? But I'm sure you could do wonders for those two articles if you chose to be inspired (I might be willing to lend a hand) and it might be more fun and productive than fussing over some silly list of wars between democracies ;-) [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 21:09, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
280469 +++$+++ Cynwolfe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280467 +++$+++ 280468 +++$+++ 2010-08-10 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.281504600E09 +++$+++ Yes, but fussing there has taken eons off my time in Purgatory. I hope. IP editing and the Hollywood connection together \u2014 yep, that's a good perception. Also reminds me that I wouldn't like articles on major mythological figures to be so brainy that they immediately turn off smart 13-year-olds who become interested through Percy Jackson, either. Aiming articles at their most likely readers has struck me as one of the trickier things on WP. I'll keep these two articles in mind, but they're pretty peripheral to what I'm working on at the moment. Wish this were gainful employment; I could move mountains. Best,  +++$+++ ::Yes, but fussing there has taken eons off my time in Purgatory. I hope. IP editing and the Hollywood connection together — yep, that's a good perception. Also reminds me that I wouldn't like articles on major mythological figures to be so brainy that they immediately turn off smart 13-year-olds who become interested through Percy Jackson, either. Aiming articles at their most likely readers has struck me as one of the trickier things on WP. I'll keep these two articles in mind, but they're pretty peripheral to what I'm working on at the moment. Wish this were gainful employment; I could move mountains. Best, [[User:Cynwolfe|Cynwolfe]] ([[User talk:Cynwolfe|talk]]) 22:30, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

18324 +++$+++ R. Wolff +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-28 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.154139480E09 +++$+++ could you take the time to pop over to that article and read over my criticism? Thanks. -- +++$+++ could you take the time to pop over to that article and read over my criticism? Thanks. --[[User:R. Wolff|R. Wolff]] 19:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
18325 +++$+++ R. Wolff +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18324 +++$+++ 18324 +++$+++ 2006-09-10 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.157917980E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks for reading it, but could you leave us some feedback? Frankly, the article isn't very good in my opinion (reasons are given on the talk page), and I'd really like your input on the talk page. Thanks. -- +++$+++ :Okay, thanks for reading it, but could you leave us some feedback? Frankly, the article isn't very good in my opinion (reasons are given on the talk page), and I'd really like your input on the talk page. Thanks. --[[User:R. Wolff|R. Wolff]] 12:53, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

280470 +++$+++ TakenakaN +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-13 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.281716880E09 +++$+++ You [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_Roman_consuls&diff=prev&oldid=378626974 reverted] one of my edits without giving a single reason. This is usually done for vandalisms, non for normal edits. Please, give a reason for that revert. -- +++$+++ You [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=List_of_Roman_consuls&diff=prev&oldid=378626974 reverted] one of my edits without giving a single reason. This is usually done for vandalisms, non for normal edits. Please, give a reason for that revert. --[[User:TakenakaN|TakenakaN]] ([[User talk:TakenakaN|talk]]) 09:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
280471 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280470 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.281727080E09 +++$+++ I'm very sorry about that. I have no memory of editing that article, and I don't know how this revert occurred. I was editing from my iPad at the time and I may have inadvertently touched the wrong part of the screen. Regards,  +++$+++ ::I'm very sorry about that. I have no memory of editing that article, and I don't know how this revert occurred. I was editing from my iPad at the time and I may have inadvertently touched the wrong part of the screen. Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 12:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
280472 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280470 +++$+++ 280470 +++$+++ 2010-08-16 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.281983040E09 +++$+++ Dates without a date era are assumed to be in the present era (i.e. AD\/CE). So no one reading \"10th century\" should be confused. Beyond that, Homer's ''Iliad'', dated to around the 8th century BC, is widely known as one of the oldest works of Western literature. Few will suppose that a ''manuscript'' of the ''Illiad'',  called \"Venetus A\" (whose name refers to [[Venice]], a city which didn't exist until around 400 AD) will have been written in the 10 century ''BC''.  +++$+++ :Dates without a date era are assumed to be in the present era (i.e. AD/CE). So no one reading "10th century" should be confused. Beyond that, Homer's ''Iliad'', dated to around the 8th century BC, is widely known as one of the oldest works of Western literature. Few will suppose that a ''manuscript'' of the ''Illiad'',  called "Venetus A" (whose name refers to [[Venice]], a city which didn't exist until around 400 AD) will have been written in the 10 century ''BC''. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 11:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

18328 +++$+++ Jonathunder +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-03 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.159941360E09 +++$+++ A meetup of [[:Category:Wikipedians in Minnesota|Wikipedians in Minnesota]] is proposed: please stop by the [[Wikipedia_talk:Meetup\/Minneapolis#2006_Meetup|discussion page]] if interested.  +++$+++ A meetup of [[:Category:Wikipedians in Minnesota|Wikipedians in Minnesota]] is proposed: please stop by the [[Wikipedia_talk:Meetup/Minneapolis#2006_Meetup|discussion page]] if interested. [[User:Jonathunder|Jonathunder]] 22:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
18329 +++$+++ Jonathunder +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18328 +++$+++ 18328 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.162074720E09 +++$+++ Reminder: [[Wikipedia:Meetup\/Minneapolis|Meetup]] October 29, one o'clock, [[Mall of America]].  +++$+++ :Reminder: [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Minneapolis|Meetup]] October 29, one o'clock, [[Mall of America]]. [[User:Jonathunder|Jonathunder]] 15:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

280473 +++$+++ Cynwolfe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-21 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.287657780E09 +++$+++ Paul, I know you watch [[Eros]] too, but I have no idea what's happened to that already dubious page. It's a disaster and I don't have time to do anything about it at the moment. You've been watching it longer than I, so perhaps the course of events will make quicker sense to you.  +++$+++ Paul, I know you watch [[Eros]] too, but I have no idea what's happened to that already dubious page. It's a disaster and I don't have time to do anything about it at the moment. You've been watching it longer than I, so perhaps the course of events will make quicker sense to you. [[User:Cynwolfe|Cynwolfe]] ([[User talk:Cynwolfe|talk]]) 03:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
280474 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280473 +++$+++ 280473 +++$+++ 2010-10-21 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.287671520E09 +++$+++ I've repaired a bit of recent vandalism, by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Eros&diff=391986709&oldid=391965704 reverting to the 05:06, 16 October 2010 version]. I haven't time now to do much more, I'm off later today to Italy for three weeks. Ciao.  +++$+++ :I've repaired a bit of recent vandalism, by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eros&diff=391986709&oldid=391965704 reverting to the 05:06, 16 October 2010 version]. I haven't time now to do much more, I'm off later today to Italy for three weeks. Ciao. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 07:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
280475 +++$+++ Cynwolfe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280473 +++$+++ 280474 +++$+++ 2010-10-21 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.287690660E09 +++$+++ Have a great time! I was supposed to go to Rome in November, but the trip was canceled. Am now rerouting a quart of my unused supply of \"will to pleasure\" to you.  +++$+++ ::Have a great time! I was supposed to go to Rome in November, but the trip was canceled. Am now rerouting a quart of my unused supply of "will to pleasure" to you. [[User:Cynwolfe|Cynwolfe]] ([[User talk:Cynwolfe|talk]]) 12:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
280476 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280473 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-10-21 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.287695520E09 +++$+++ So I'm getting the interest on your pleasure principle am I? How nice, though I have quite a stock of my own.  +++$+++ ::::So I'm getting the interest on your pleasure principle am I? How nice, though I have quite a stock of my own. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
280477 +++$+++ Cynwolfe +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280473 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-10-21 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.287696240E09 +++$+++ Ooh, financial language. I'm now struck dumb, after my brave attempt to banish envy through good wishes. I just keep repeating \"Rome will always be there, Rome will always be there.\" So it is pleasure and not a business trip? I was hitchhiking on a relative's business trip. Since I'm feeling a bit stir crazy at the moment, three weeks of travel sounds like heaven.  +++$+++ :::::Ooh, financial language. I'm now struck dumb, after my brave attempt to banish envy through good wishes. I just keep repeating "Rome will always be there, Rome will always be there." So it is pleasure and not a business trip? I was hitchhiking on a relative's business trip. Since I'm feeling a bit stir crazy at the moment, three weeks of travel sounds like heaven. [[User:Cynwolfe|Cynwolfe]] ([[User talk:Cynwolfe|talk]]) 14:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
280478 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280473 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-10-21 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.287696720E09 +++$+++ Business? What's that? Only pleasure for me. And yes the eternal city should still be there for a while yet.  +++$+++ ::::::Business? What's that? Only pleasure for me. And yes the eternal city should still be there for a while yet. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

542618 +++$+++  +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-09 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.157790600E09 +++$+++ Any user, anonymous or logged in is able to edit Wikipedia, this is one of the backbones of the project. That being said we also have guidelines that we must follow. In your case you edited [[Vermilion, Alberta]], and edited out three notable people(An Olypmic cross country skier, an NHL hockey player and an Order of Canada winning chef) and replaced them with with three other people. These people you added do not fall under the guideline of [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)]] which helps us decide which people to include on Wikipedia, since it would be unrealistic for us to include every single person in the world. Hope that clears it up.  +++$+++ Any user, anonymous or logged in is able to edit Wikipedia, this is one of the backbones of the project. That being said we also have guidelines that we must follow. In your case you edited [[Vermilion, Alberta]], and edited out three notable people(An Olypmic cross country skier, an NHL hockey player and an Order of Canada winning chef) and replaced them with with three other people. These people you added do not fall under the guideline of [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)]] which helps us decide which people to include on Wikipedia, since it would be unrealistic for us to include every single person in the world. Hope that clears it up. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 01:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
542619 +++$+++  +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542618 +++$+++ 542618 +++$+++ 2006-09-11 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.157979360E09 +++$+++ On a last note, all of Wikipedia's documents and images are licensed through Fair Use, GNU, Public Domain and a variety of other licenses. Copywrite infringement, plagarism and trade mark infringement are not tollerated, and any examples of these are deleted as soon as they are discovered.  +++$+++ :On a last note, all of Wikipedia's documents and images are licensed through Fair Use, GNU, Public Domain and a variety of other licenses. Copywrite infringement, plagarism and trade mark infringement are not tollerated, and any examples of these are deleted as soon as they are discovered. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 05:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
542620 +++$+++  +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542618 +++$+++ 542618 +++$+++ 2006-09-11 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.158028260E09 +++$+++ Hi, One of our priorities on Wikipedia is the ability for anyone to edit an article. These edits however must fall under several criteria to be kept, most importantly they must be notable and verifiable. This means that information must be verifiable by an outside source(Newspaper, Radio, TV, etc) and be particularely notable(Not just an average person, but more of a celebrity). If you can establish these two criteria in the names you are adding they will be kept. Thanks  +++$+++ :Hi, One of our priorities on Wikipedia is the ability for anyone to edit an article. These edits however must fall under several criteria to be kept, most importantly they must be notable and verifiable. This means that information must be verifiable by an outside source(Newspaper, Radio, TV, etc) and be particularely notable(Not just an average person, but more of a celebrity). If you can establish these two criteria in the names you are adding they will be kept. Thanks [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 19:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

18333 +++$+++ Nihiltres +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-14 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.163556240E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I just reverted an edit you made. You changed all the \"colour\" entries on the page [[Orange (colour)]] to \"color\". I reverted it because the article on orange is standardized to the \"colour\" spelling, including the title. Don't worry, this is a common mistake: see the [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English|Manual of Style]]. Please don't change the localization of the spelling in an article except to standardize it to a particular spelling if there is mixed usage such as \"''The '''color''' orange is nothing like the '''colour''' blue.''\" Regards,  +++$+++ Hi there. I just reverted an edit you made. You changed all the "colour" entries on the page [[Orange (colour)]] to "color". I reverted it because the article on orange is standardized to the "colour" spelling, including the title. Don't worry, this is a common mistake: see the [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English|Manual of Style]]. Please don't change the localization of the spelling in an article except to standardize it to a particular spelling if there is mixed usage such as "''The '''color''' orange is nothing like the '''colour''' blue.''" Regards, [[User:Nihiltres|Nihiltres]] 18:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
18334 +++$+++ Nihiltres +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18333 +++$+++ 18333 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.163576340E09 +++$+++ After checking my watchlist today, I realized that you changed each of my standardizations of articles to conform to \"color.\" Moreover, [[Special:Contributions\/Cat%27s_Tuxedo|you changed only those pages]]. This is extremely frustrating for me, especially in the case of [[Black]], where my general lookover (and my edit summary) indicated that the \"colour\" spelling was ''much'' more widely used (see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Black&diff=87673458&oldid=87634881 how few I changed]). Please comment, I'd like to work this out amicably.  +++$+++ :After checking my watchlist today, I realized that you changed each of my standardizations of articles to conform to "color." Moreover, [[Special:Contributions/Cat%27s_Tuxedo|you changed only those pages]]. This is extremely frustrating for me, especially in the case of [[Black]], where my general lookover (and my edit summary) indicated that the "colour" spelling was ''much'' more widely used (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black&diff=87673458&oldid=87634881 how few I changed]). Please comment, I'd like to work this out amicably. [[User:Nihiltres|Nihiltres]] 23:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
18335 +++$+++ Nihiltres +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18333 +++$+++ 18334 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.163669940E09 +++$+++ I'm going to change both of [[Orange (colour)]] and [[Blue]] back to the British spelling, as per [[WP:MOS#National_varieties_of_English|the Manual of Style's guideline on resolving these decisions.]] I will change Orange back to correspond to the spelling used in its title (per the rule that articles should be consistent), and Blue back to correspond to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Blue&oldid=239829 the dialect used by the first contributor]. I'll leave Black - despite [[User:Cat's Tuxedo|Cat's Tuxedo]]'s needless change against [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Black&diff=87673458&oldid=87634881 my change that changed very few instances], it is the dialect of the first contributor. Hopefully this solution, aided by the MoS, can resolve this ultimately pointless conflict. I'll wait until I hear from (both of) you to go ahead and change any of the articles concerned back, to prevent this being construed as more edit warring. I'm posting this on the talk pages of both [[User talk:Zoe|Zoe]] and [[User talk:Cat's Tuxedo|Cat's Tuxedo]]. Regards,  +++$+++ ::I'm going to change both of [[Orange (colour)]] and [[Blue]] back to the British spelling, as per [[WP:MOS#National_varieties_of_English|the Manual of Style's guideline on resolving these decisions.]] I will change Orange back to correspond to the spelling used in its title (per the rule that articles should be consistent), and Blue back to correspond to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blue&oldid=239829 the dialect used by the first contributor]. I'll leave Black - despite [[User:Cat's Tuxedo|Cat's Tuxedo]]'s needless change against [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black&diff=87673458&oldid=87634881 my change that changed very few instances], it is the dialect of the first contributor. Hopefully this solution, aided by the MoS, can resolve this ultimately pointless conflict. I'll wait until I hear from (both of) you to go ahead and change any of the articles concerned back, to prevent this being construed as more edit warring. I'm posting this on the talk pages of both [[User talk:Zoe|Zoe]] and [[User talk:Cat's Tuxedo|Cat's Tuxedo]]. Regards, [[User:Nihiltres|Nihiltres]] 01:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

280479 +++$+++ Lt.Specht +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280479 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.289953620E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you could add your input [[Talk:Attalus I#Coins|here]], instead of just reverting with no comment.  +++$+++ Perhaps you could add your input [[Talk:Attalus I#Coins|here]], instead of just reverting with no comment. [[User:Lt.Specht|Lt.Specht]] ([[User talk:Lt.Specht|talk]]) 16:27, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
280480 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280479 +++$+++ 280479 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.289969940E09 +++$+++ Sorry I hadn't seen that you had left a comment on the talk page. I'll respond there.  +++$+++ :Sorry I hadn't seen that you had left a comment on the talk page. I'll respond there. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 20:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

542624 +++$+++ Messedrocker +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542624 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-14 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.158285240E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Canadian-Bacon, for voting on my RFA, which passed 95 to 1. It's great working with you and the others on the [[YTMND]] article, hopefully we can improve it to featured article someday! Now that I have the mop, I hope I can live up to the standard, and be a good administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. \u2014 +++$+++ Thank you, Canadian-Bacon, for voting on my RFA, which passed 95 to 1. It's great working with you and the others on the [[YTMND]] article, hopefully we can improve it to featured article someday! Now that I have the mop, I hope I can live up to the standard, and be a good administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. —[[User:Messedrocker|<font color="blue"><code>this is messedrocker</code></font>]] [[User talk:Messedrocker|<font color="blue"><code>(talk)</code></font>]] 18:54, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
542625 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542624 +++$+++ 542624 +++$+++ 2006-09-18 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.158591120E09 +++$+++ Well because [[User:NSR]] most likely disagrees with your personal attack against him, as does Wikipedia as is clearly outlined in [[WP:NPA]]. Please Stop. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color=\"Red\">Canadian<\/font>''-'''''<font color=\"Black\">Bacon<\/font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Red\">''t''<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Black\">''c''<\/font>]]  +++$+++ :Well because [[User:NSR]] most likely disagrees with your personal attack against him, as does Wikipedia as is clearly outlined in [[WP:NPA]]. Please Stop. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[User:Canadian-Bacon/Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 07:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

18337 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-17 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.163751540E09 +++$+++ I was only trying to improve the article by adding more useful info. Basically, I was only trying to help. Hmmm.  +++$+++ I was only trying to improve the article by adding more useful info. Basically, I was only trying to help. Hmmm. [[User:Cat's Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] 00:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
18338 +++$+++ Xlittlecloudx +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18337 +++$+++ 18337 +++$+++ 2008-02-04 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.202126460E09 +++$+++ I've been doing that with virtually everything for 8 years now, but unless it's Japanese-related, it's quite unnecessary.  +++$+++ *I've been doing that with virtually everything for 8 years now, but unless it's Japanese-related, it's quite unnecessary. [[User:Xlittlecloudx|Xlittlecloudx]] ([[User talk:Xlittlecloudx|talk]]) 04:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

542626 +++$+++ Armon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-18 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.158596100E09 +++$+++ Sorry for my lack of input on the mediation -I've been sick. I'll get back to it ASAP.  +++$+++ Sorry for my lack of input on the mediation -I've been sick. I'll get back to it ASAP. [[User:Armon|Armon]] 09:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
542627 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542626 +++$+++ 542626 +++$+++ 2006-09-18 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.158616440E09 +++$+++ No problem, it happens to the best of us [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color=\"Red\">Canadian<\/font>''-'''''<font color=\"Black\">Bacon<\/font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Red\">''t''<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Black\">''c''<\/font>]]  +++$+++ :No problem, it happens to the best of us [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[User:Canadian-Bacon/Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 14:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

18341 +++$+++  +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ thanks for keeping the crash article clean. Mike 06:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ thanks for keeping the crash article clean. Mike 06:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
18342 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18341 +++$+++ 18341 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.167204240E09 +++$+++ Why thank ye. Since [[Link (The Legend of Zelda)]] is the only main video game character with a featured article, I used that as my main reference in my big cleanup of the page. It's a damn shame that so very few video game characters have featured articles. Help us change that, will ya? +++$+++ :Why thank ye. Since [[Link (The Legend of Zelda)]] is the only main video game character with a featured article, I used that as my main reference in my big cleanup of the page. It's a damn shame that so very few video game characters have featured articles. Help us change that, will ya?[[User:Cat's Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] 23:24, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

280487 +++$+++ Jpgordon +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280487 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-11-14 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.100493000E09 +++$+++ Please be sure to use the template provided in the [[wp:vip]] page when making new entries. It makes it a lot easier for others to trace what the vandal has been doing -- +++$+++ Please be sure to use the template provided in the [[wp:vip]] page when making new entries. It makes it a lot easier for others to trace what the vandal has been doing --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]{[[User talk:Jpgordon|gab}]] 20:30, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
280488 +++$+++ Jpgordon +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280487 +++$+++ 280487 +++$+++ 2004-11-14 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.100493660E09 +++$+++ Ooops, sorry. Typo. Anyway, you'll see the template [[Wikipedia:vandalism in progress#Current alerts|here.]]  -- oh, p.s., please \"talk\" on another user's \"talk\" page, not their \"user\" page. -- +++$+++ * Ooops, sorry. Typo. Anyway, you'll see the template [[Wikipedia:vandalism in progress#Current alerts|here.]]  -- oh, p.s., please "talk" on another user's "talk" page, not their "user" page. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]{[[User talk:Jpgordon|gab}]] 20:41, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

18344 +++$+++ Axem Titanium +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18344 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-07 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.168175880E09 +++$+++ I've tagged your recent edit to [[The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask]] as unsourced. While it appears to be a decent contribution, it is unsourced so I would be interested to know where you got your information. Thanks.  +++$+++ I've tagged your recent edit to [[The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask]] as unsourced. While it appears to be a decent contribution, it is unsourced so I would be interested to know where you got your information. Thanks. [[User:Axem Titanium|Axem Titanium]] 05:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
18345 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18344 +++$+++ 18344 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.168178700E09 +++$+++ Well, if you must know, I got it off the Internet Movie DataBase. It's in the Alternate Versions section of the Majora's Mask article. It's right here: [http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0264790\/alternateversions]  +++$+++ :Well, if you must know, I got it off the Internet Movie DataBase. It's in the Alternate Versions section of the Majora's Mask article. It's right here: [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0264790/alternateversions] [[User:Cat's Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] 06:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
18346 +++$+++ Axem Titanium +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18344 +++$+++ 18345 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.168216620E09 +++$+++ Oh, that's unfortunate since imdb is notorious for not being the most reliable source when it comes to trivia. Also, I'm not sure if it would fall under [[WP:COPYVIO]] since I don't know the copyright status of that page. I'll try to find an alternative source.  +++$+++ ::Oh, that's unfortunate since imdb is notorious for not being the most reliable source when it comes to trivia. Also, I'm not sure if it would fall under [[WP:COPYVIO]] since I don't know the copyright status of that page. I'll try to find an alternative source. [[User:Axem Titanium|Axem Titanium]] 16:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

18347 +++$+++ InsaneZeroG +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.169116200E09 +++$+++ I like what you did with the [[Keroro (character)|Keroro]](this should be moved to [[Keroro (Sgt. Frog)]] or something similar) article. It looks a lot cleaner than before especially since there was a truckload of unencyclopedic information. There seems to be a bit of dispute with it, but I think it's all for the better. I hope you'll be able to do the other articles the same way too.  +++$+++ I like what you did with the [[Keroro (character)|Keroro]](this should be moved to [[Keroro (Sgt. Frog)]] or something similar) article. It looks a lot cleaner than before especially since there was a truckload of unencyclopedic information. There seems to be a bit of dispute with it, but I think it's all for the better. I hope you'll be able to do the other articles the same way too. [[User:InsaneZeroG|InsaneZeroG]] 02:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
18348 +++$+++ Wildyoda +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18347 +++$+++ 18347 +++$+++ 2007-02-19 08:44:00 +++$+++ 1.171903440E09 +++$+++ Hi there. I noticed you're fan of the [[Dragon Ball]] series, and I'm trying to recruit some fans from here to contribute to the [http:\/\/dragonball.wikia.com\/wiki\/Main_Page Dragon Ball Wiki]. It's in terrible shape right now with pretty much no consistency or policies, and only this week have I been able to get [[User:Angela|Angela]] and [[User:Sannse|Sannse]] to create some Forums for us over there. I've got a proposed [http:\/\/dragonball.wikia.com\/wiki\/Forum:Manual_of_Style Manual of Style] going over there and would like some people to contribute to that to set up some policies and start making the wiki bigger, better, and more intelligible\/consistent. If you're interested, please [http:\/\/dragonball.wikia.com\/wiki\/Main_Page hop on over] or [http:\/\/dragonball.wikia.com\/wiki\/User_talk:Wildyoda talk to me]. Thanks for the time, whether you're interested or not.  +++$+++ *Hi there. I noticed you're fan of the [[Dragon Ball]] series, and I'm trying to recruit some fans from here to contribute to the [http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page Dragon Ball Wiki]. It's in terrible shape right now with pretty much no consistency or policies, and only this week have I been able to get [[User:Angela|Angela]] and [[User:Sannse|Sannse]] to create some Forums for us over there. I've got a proposed [http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Manual_of_Style Manual of Style] going over there and would like some people to contribute to that to set up some policies and start making the wiki bigger, better, and more intelligible/consistent. If you're interested, please [http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page hop on over] or [http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Wildyoda talk to me]. Thanks for the time, whether you're interested or not. [[User:Wildyoda|Wildyoda]] 08:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

542636 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542636 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-26 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.159260300E09 +++$+++ I know. It's a wonder since I've been participating in so many EA programs, right? Anyway, this month I changed my username from '''Leroyencyclopediabrown''' to '''Ed''' (my previous name was a little long). I'll go search for my name on the list and make the changes needed. May the best Esperanzian win!--[[User:Ed|Ed]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|talk]] [[Special:Contributions\/Ed|c]] ''' +++$+++ I know. It's a wonder since I've been participating in so many EA programs, right? Anyway, this month I changed my username from '''Leroyencyclopediabrown''' to '''Ed''' (my previous name was a little long). I'll go search for my name on the list and make the changes needed. May the best Esperanzian win!--[[User:Ed|Ed]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Ed|c]] '''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''</sup> 01:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
542637 +++$+++ Ed +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542636 +++$+++ 542636 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.159260900E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I apologize for any confusion.--[[User:Ed|Ed]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|talk]] [[Special:Contributions\/Ed|c]] ''' +++$+++ :Thanks. I apologize for any confusion.--[[User:Ed|Ed]]<sup>[[User talk:Ed|talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Ed|c]] '''[[User:Ed/Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]'''</sup> 01:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
542638 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542636 +++$+++ 542636 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.159275720E09 +++$+++ We are not \"defending Nazis\", we are making sure all articles maintain a factual basis. This is an encyclopedia, not your soap box, please stop or you will be blocked. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color=\"Red\">Canadian<\/font>''-'''''<font color=\"Black\">Bacon<\/font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Red\">''t''<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Black\">''c''<\/font>]]  +++$+++ :We are not "defending Nazis", we are making sure all articles maintain a factual basis. This is an encyclopedia, not your soap box, please stop or you will be blocked. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[User:Canadian-Bacon/Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 06:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
542639 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542636 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.159276260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the information. Have a nice day. :) [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color=\"Red\">Canadian<\/font>''-'''''<font color=\"Black\">Bacon<\/font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Red\">''t''<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Black\">''c''<\/font>]]  +++$+++ :::Thanks for the information. Have a nice day. :) [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[User:Canadian-Bacon/Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 06:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

18351 +++$+++ A Link to the Past +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-19 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.176977220E09 +++$+++ If you want more of the content to remain, then I suggest that you do a split of the list to separate heroes and villains. -  +++$+++ If you want more of the content to remain, then I suggest that you do a split of the list to separate heroes and villains. - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] [[User talk:A Link to the Past|(talk)]] 03:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
18352 +++$+++ A Link to the Past +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18351 +++$+++ 18351 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.177031700E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure why you didn't revert my other similar merges. -  +++$+++ :I'm not sure why you didn't revert my other similar merges. - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] [[User talk:A Link to the Past|(talk)]] 18:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
18353 +++$+++ Squirepants101 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18351 +++$+++ 18351 +++$+++ 2007-04-30 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.178002740E09 +++$+++ <span id=\"FUC9\" \/><span id=\"NFCC9\" \/><span id=\"9\" \/><span id=\"Articlespaceonly\" \/>Non-free images may be used '''only''' in the article namespace. They should '''never''' be used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on [[Wikipedia:User page|user pages]]. To prevent an image category from displaying thumbnails, add <nowiki>__NOGALLERY__<\/nowiki> to it. They should be linked, not inlined, from talk pages when they are the topic of discussion. This is because it is the policy of the Wikimedia Foundation to allow an unfree image only if no free alternative exists and only if it significantly improves the article it is included on. All other uses, even if legal under the fair use clauses of copyright law, should be avoided to keep the use of unfree images to a minimum. [[Wikipedia:Non-free_content_criteria_exemptions|Exceptions]] can be made on a case-by-case basis if there is a broad [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] that doing so is necessary to the goal of creating a free encyclopedia (like the gallery of [[:Category:Replaceable fair use images]], which is needed to help people find images to replace).  +++$+++ :<span id="FUC9" /><span id="NFCC9" /><span id="9" /><span id="Articlespaceonly" />Non-free images may be used '''only''' in the article namespace. They should '''never''' be used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on [[Wikipedia:User page|user pages]]. To prevent an image category from displaying thumbnails, add <nowiki>__NOGALLERY__</nowiki> to it. They should be linked, not inlined, from talk pages when they are the topic of discussion. This is because it is the policy of the Wikimedia Foundation to allow an unfree image only if no free alternative exists and only if it significantly improves the article it is included on. All other uses, even if legal under the fair use clauses of copyright law, should be avoided to keep the use of unfree images to a minimum. [[Wikipedia:Non-free_content_criteria_exemptions|Exceptions]] can be made on a case-by-case basis if there is a broad [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] that doing so is necessary to the goal of creating a free encyclopedia (like the gallery of [[:Category:Replaceable fair use images]], which is needed to help people find images to replace). [[User:Squirepants101|Squirepants101]] 23:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

542640 +++$+++ Academic Challenger +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-26 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.159277040E09 +++$+++ Do you think it's time to semi-protect it?  +++$+++ Do you think it's time to semi-protect it? [[User:Academic Challenger|Academic Challenger]] 06:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
542641 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542640 +++$+++ 542640 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.159277160E09 +++$+++ I don't really have any relation to the article, but it looks like it could use it. Thanks. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color=\"Red\">Canadian<\/font>''-'''''<font color=\"Black\">Bacon<\/font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Red\">''t''<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Black\">''c''<\/font>]]  +++$+++ :I don't really have any relation to the article, but it looks like it could use it. Thanks. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[User:Canadian-Bacon/Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 06:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

280498 +++$+++ Simplebrain +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-11-25 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.101392460E09 +++$+++ Hu: You were stressing for me the importance of '''NPoV''' in the article on the topic Science of Value.   Why, I ask, don't you get after Gene Smith, who has hijacked my site, and has anything but a neutral point of view:  he has lengthened what this morning was a fairly decent description of the founder of this new discipline, who worked out the rudiments of it back in in 1955-1962, and now he has added a '''non-concise''', a lengthy section entitled An Evaluation of The Work of Hartman. This is hostile, and distorted, and downright mean.  His '''bias''' shows like Mt. Rushmore!!  --- a gross violation of NPoV.  He emailed one lady he knows that teaches philosophy somewhere, and she told him that people she knows don't teach Dr. Hartman in their classes.  From this he is generalizing to philosophers round the world, implying, falsely, that Hartman is not held in respect by major philosophers.  But when the United Nations wanted the leading authority in the field of axiology to write a summary of the state of axiology the world over, in 1950, UNESCO selected Dr. Hartman.  His booklet was entitled \"Value Theory at Mid-Century.\"  I don't see how Gene's critique of Hartman's philosophical efforts, and of a weak spot in Hartman's magnum opus, has much of anything to do with the topic in the headline: Value Science.  It's been over 40 years since Hartman wrote that book, and the analysis of values by scientific methods has made lots and lots of progress since then.  I don't, however, want any hype to appear in the article, but I also don't want this pioneer founder smeared like this!  He is dead and can't defend himself; otherwise he would sue this guy for slander and defamation.  You call this neutral?!!  I would like to present counter-arguments, but I gather from the Style Manual that a Wikipedia entry is not the place for a scholarly dialog.  So this vandalism goes unchecked.     So I plead with you:    HELP.    +++$+++ Hu: You were stressing for me the importance of '''NPoV''' in the article on the topic Science of Value.   Why, I ask, don't you get after Gene Smith, who has hijacked my site, and has anything but a neutral point of view:  he has lengthened what this morning was a fairly decent description of the founder of this new discipline, who worked out the rudiments of it back in in 1955-1962, and now he has added a '''non-concise''', a lengthy section entitled An Evaluation of The Work of Hartman. This is hostile, and distorted, and downright mean.  His '''bias''' shows like Mt. Rushmore!!  --- a gross violation of NPoV.  He emailed one lady he knows that teaches philosophy somewhere, and she told him that people she knows don't teach Dr. Hartman in their classes.  From this he is generalizing to philosophers round the world, implying, falsely, that Hartman is not held in respect by major philosophers.  But when the United Nations wanted the leading authority in the field of axiology to write a summary of the state of axiology the world over, in 1950, UNESCO selected Dr. Hartman.  His booklet was entitled "Value Theory at Mid-Century."  I don't see how Gene's critique of Hartman's philosophical efforts, and of a weak spot in Hartman's magnum opus, has much of anything to do with the topic in the headline: Value Science.  It's been over 40 years since Hartman wrote that book, and the analysis of values by scientific methods has made lots and lots of progress since then.  I don't, however, want any hype to appear in the article, but I also don't want this pioneer founder smeared like this!  He is dead and can't defend himself; otherwise he would sue this guy for slander and defamation.  You call this neutral?!!  I would like to present counter-arguments, but I gather from the Style Manual that a Wikipedia entry is not the place for a scholarly dialog.  So this vandalism goes unchecked.     So I plead with you:    HELP.   [[User:Simplebrain|Simplebrain]] 06:21, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
280499 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280498 +++$+++ 280498 +++$+++ 2004-11-25 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.101392760E09 +++$+++ Sigh, you still don't get it.  It is '''not your site'''.  Buy your own site.  And don't drop rants in the middle of other people's commentary on my talk page. I may take a look at the SoV page later.  +++$+++ * Sigh, you still don't get it.  It is '''not your site'''.  Buy your own site.  And don't drop rants in the middle of other people's commentary on my talk page. I may take a look at the SoV page later. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 06:26, 2004 Nov 25 (UTC)
280500 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280498 +++$+++ 280498 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ The state of the page at 06:34, 2004 Nov 25 (UTC) (Gene Ward's last edit about 90 minutes ago) seems to be a great improvement over what came before. If Simplebrain would like to add a section which is a more positive evaluation, he is free to do so, and have it subjected to review by the whole Wikipedia community, as is everything else. But I hope that what appears on the page as of this writing will be the basic foundation of the page. Hu 06:34, 2004 Nov 25 (UTC) +++$+++ * The state of the page at 06:34, 2004 Nov 25 (UTC) (Gene Ward's last edit about 90 minutes ago) seems to be a great improvement over what came before. If Simplebrain would like to add a section which is a more positive evaluation, he is free to do so, and have it subjected to review by the whole Wikipedia community, as is everything else. But I hope that what appears on the page as of this writing will be the basic foundation of the page. Hu 06:34, 2004 Nov 25 (UTC)

542644 +++$+++ Academic Challenger +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542644 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-26 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.159277700E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ Done. [[User:Academic Challenger|Academic Challenger]] 06:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
542645 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542644 +++$+++ 542644 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.159277760E09 +++$+++ Thanks, hopefully that'll clear things up. Good to have admins around tonight. Cheers. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color=\"Red\">Canadian<\/font>''-'''''<font color=\"Black\">Bacon<\/font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Red\">''t''<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Black\">''c''<\/font>]]  +++$+++ :Thanks, hopefully that'll clear things up. Good to have admins around tonight. Cheers. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[User:Canadian-Bacon/Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 06:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
542646 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542644 +++$+++ 542644 +++$+++ 2006-09-26 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.159279080E09 +++$+++ If a major news source has not cited it then it is not notable. Wikipedia isn't for things about your friends, or things made up in school one day. Please stop [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color=\"Red\">Canadian<\/font>''-'''''<font color=\"Black\">Bacon<\/font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Red\">''t''<\/font>]] [[Special:Contributions\/Canadian-Bacon|<font color=\"Black\">''c''<\/font>]]  +++$+++ :If a major news source has not cited it then it is not notable. Wikipedia isn't for things about your friends, or things made up in school one day. Please stop [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]] [[User:Canadian-Bacon/Esperanza|<font color="Green">''e''</font>]]</sup> 06:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

571038 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-23 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.161607560E09 +++$+++ For the Barnstar, I thankyou chemically, physically and metaphorically. But seriously, thanks. Enjoy the Beautiful Queensland sunshine! [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ For the Barnstar, I thankyou chemically, physically and metaphorically. But seriously, thanks. Enjoy the Beautiful Queensland sunshine! [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 05:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
571039 +++$+++ Jam01 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571038 +++$+++ 571038 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.161610080E09 +++$+++ I agree, it certainly looks better. I can't take credit for it though. [[User:Editor at Large|Editor at Large]] designed it or me. Cheers. - [[User:Jam01|Jam]]<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :I agree, it certainly looks better. I can't take credit for it though. [[User:Editor at Large|Editor at Large]] designed it or me. Cheers. - [[User:Jam01|Jam]]<font color="green">[[User:Jam01/Esperanza|01]]</font> 06:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

280502 +++$+++ Nathanlarson32767 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-11-28 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.101710340E09 +++$+++ What is a good way to hunt for public domain images for my wiki articles?  +++$+++ What is a good way to hunt for public domain images for my wiki articles? [[User:Nathanlarson32767|Nathanlarson32767]] 22:39, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
280503 +++$+++ Nathanlarson32767 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280502 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2004-11-28 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.101712680E09 +++$+++ Hey that is a good idea. Thanks for the advice. Unfortunately, I already sent a bunch of emails out saying \"I am writing a Wikipedia article on x; can I use your image of ...\" Well, we'll see what happens.  +++$+++ ::Hey that is a good idea. Thanks for the advice. Unfortunately, I already sent a bunch of emails out saying "I am writing a Wikipedia article on x; can I use your image of ..." Well, we'll see what happens. [[User:Nathanlarson32767|Nathanlarson32767]] 23:18, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

280504 +++$+++ CSTAR +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280504 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-12-01 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.101938520E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ Thanks! [[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 14:02, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
280505 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280504 +++$+++ 280504 +++$+++ 2004-12-01 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.101907140E09 +++$+++ For the following reasons I am thinking that these pages has been the victim of a tiresome semi-sophisticated troll and '''the PoV sticker should be removed sooner rather than later, if not immediately'''.  We may note that [[User:CSTAR | CStar]] ([[User talk: CSTAR | talk]], [[Special:contributions\/CSTAR | contributions]]) after making edits, paused during the period user Critical made edits, and then CStar took up responding to these edits after the series of user Critical edits ends, as if there is only one user involved, and the user logged out, changed cookies and logged back in.  Further, user CStar left a note on [[User talk:Charles_Matthews | Charles Matthew's talk page]], [[User talk:Chalst | Chalst's talk page]], and  [[User talk:Angela | Angela's talk page]] pointing to a supposed PoV accusation placed on the [[Logical argument]] page, when in fact no such sticker has been placed.  Perhaps the irony regarding the Physical law page is not so ironic.  +++$+++ :For the following reasons I am thinking that these pages has been the victim of a tiresome semi-sophisticated troll and '''the PoV sticker should be removed sooner rather than later, if not immediately'''.  We may note that [[User:CSTAR | CStar]] ([[User talk: CSTAR | talk]], [[Special:contributions/CSTAR | contributions]]) after making edits, paused during the period user Critical made edits, and then CStar took up responding to these edits after the series of user Critical edits ends, as if there is only one user involved, and the user logged out, changed cookies and logged back in.  Further, user CStar left a note on [[User talk:Charles_Matthews | Charles Matthew's talk page]], [[User talk:Chalst | Chalst's talk page]], and  [[User talk:Angela | Angela's talk page]] pointing to a supposed PoV accusation placed on the [[Logical argument]] page, when in fact no such sticker has been placed.  Perhaps the irony regarding the Physical law page is not so ironic. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 05:19, 2004 Dec 1 (UTC)

18361 +++$+++  +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Hi I'm a new user..can you tell me how can I put userboxes in my userpage? Princess_Elise17 12:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ Hi I'm a new user..can you tell me how can I put userboxes in my userpage? Princess_Elise17 12:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
18362 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18361 +++$+++ 18361 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.188963600E09 +++$+++ Oh, that's easy. Just follow the instructions on this page ([[Wikipedia:Userboxes]]) and you'll figure it out.  +++$+++ :Oh, that's easy. Just follow the instructions on this page ([[Wikipedia:Userboxes]]) and you'll figure it out. [[User:Cat's Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] 20:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

280506 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280506 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-12-01 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.101957720E09 +++$+++ I was  mystified by the targeted nature of the edits, the timing of the edits, the apparent irony, and the misdirection in the response.  If you disclaim responsibility, then that is fine with me, pending further information or developments.  +++$+++ I was  mystified by the targeted nature of the edits, the timing of the edits, the apparent irony, and the misdirection in the response.  If you disclaim responsibility, then that is fine with me, pending further information or developments. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 19:22, 2004 Dec 1 (UTC)
280507 +++$+++ CSTAR +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280506 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2004-12-02 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.101978900E09 +++$+++ Thanks!   +++$+++ :: Thanks!  [[User:CSTAR|CSTAR]] 01:15, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
280508 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280506 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2004-12-02 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.101979620E09 +++$+++ That seems reasonable.  +++$+++ :: That seems reasonable. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 01:27, 2004 Dec 2 (UTC)

18365 +++$+++ ADBandicoot +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18365 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-02 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.196646600E09 +++$+++ I'm intending on creating a list of Crash Bandicoot locations. Do have any advice for me?  +++$+++ I'm intending on creating a list of Crash Bandicoot locations. Do have any advice for me? [[User:ADBandicoot|ADBandicoot]] 17:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
18366 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18365 +++$+++ 18365 +++$+++ 2007-12-02 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.196651040E09 +++$+++ You should try using the [[Universe of Kingdom Hearts]] article as reference. The article should start off with a 'Concept and design' section describing how the areas were created and styled. I suggest looking up Naughty Dog's Crash Bandicoot websites or Radical's ''Crash of the Titans'' interview with Crash Mania for info on that. Then it should go into the list of the locations, to which the [[Wumpa Islands]] article should be merged. The 'Earth' section should go like this: N. Sanity Island, Wumpa Island, Cortex Island, Iceberg Lab, Von Clutch's MotorWorld, and there might be some others that I'm forgetting. I think other worlds should be included after that, like the Tenth Dimension, the Galaxy Circuit, Hyperspace, places like that. The article should end with a reception page saying what reviewers think of the worlds in different games. Oh, and make sure there's references.  +++$+++ :You should try using the [[Universe of Kingdom Hearts]] article as reference. The article should start off with a 'Concept and design' section describing how the areas were created and styled. I suggest looking up Naughty Dog's Crash Bandicoot websites or Radical's ''Crash of the Titans'' interview with Crash Mania for info on that. Then it should go into the list of the locations, to which the [[Wumpa Islands]] article should be merged. The 'Earth' section should go like this: N. Sanity Island, Wumpa Island, Cortex Island, Iceberg Lab, Von Clutch's MotorWorld, and there might be some others that I'm forgetting. I think other worlds should be included after that, like the Tenth Dimension, the Galaxy Circuit, Hyperspace, places like that. The article should end with a reception page saying what reviewers think of the worlds in different games. Oh, and make sure there's references. [[User:Cat's Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] 19:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

18367 +++$+++ ADBandicoot +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-12 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.197510600E09 +++$+++ That user you see on the headline called you immature on the Crash Twinsanity talk page. Tell him not to be incivil.  +++$+++ That user you see on the headline called you immature on the Crash Twinsanity talk page. Tell him not to be incivil. [[User:ADBandicoot|ADBandicoot]] ([[User talk:ADBandicoot|talk]]) 17:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
18368 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18367 +++$+++ 18367 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.197514500E09 +++$+++ Can't you do it? I've got other things to do.  +++$+++ :Can't you do it? I've got other things to do. [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 18:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

280512 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280512 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-01-07 09:25:00 +++$+++ 1.105118700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Hu|Hu]] 09:25, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC)
280513 +++$+++ H1523702 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280512 +++$+++ 280512 +++$+++ 2005-01-07 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.105137480E09 +++$+++ While I admit that some of your edits have more substance than I first suggested, I would suggest that you are engaging in semantics. However it is reassuring to find an editor who is as rigorous and knowledgable as you obviously are. Regards,  +++$+++ :While I admit that some of your edits have more substance than I first suggested, I would suggest that you are engaging in semantics. However it is reassuring to find an editor who is as rigorous and knowledgable as you obviously are. Regards, [[User:H1523702|Mark]] 14:38, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
280514 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280512 +++$+++ 280513 +++$+++ 2005-01-07 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.105163400E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  I am still learning about many things, including grammar.  Rigor often trips me up and is not a pure positive!  +++$+++ ::Thank you.  I am still learning about many things, including grammar.  Rigor often trips me up and is not a pure positive! [[User:Hu|Hu]] 21:50, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC)

280515 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-10 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.131644820E09 +++$+++ The Manual of Style  guidelines involve (among other things) no secondary Wikilinking. -- +++$+++ The Manual of Style  guidelines involve (among other things) no secondary Wikilinking. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>)]] 09:47, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
280516 +++$+++ Mel Etitis +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280515 +++$+++ 280515 +++$+++ 2005-11-10 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.131689880E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I should have said: [[Foundation]]. -- +++$+++ :Sorry, I should have said: [[Foundation]]. --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]]  ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>)]] 22:18, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

542660 +++$+++ Bubba hotep +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-23 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.164346800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the swift user-page revert! Blimey, I didn't even see that one coming. I don't think I've even had any dealings with them today. Unless that was a ''real'' award they were leaving me. :)  +++$+++ Thanks for the swift user-page revert! Blimey, I didn't even see that one coming. I don't think I've even had any dealings with them today. Unless that was a ''real'' award they were leaving me. :) [[User:Bubba hotep|Bubba]] [[User talk:Bubba hotep|hot]][[Special:Contributions/Bubba hotep|ep]] 21:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
542661 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542660 +++$+++ 542660 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.164440460E09 +++$+++ I understand you effort to help but the links you inserted are all commercial sites, and that can be seen as advertising. If you review [[WP:EL]] you can see what kind of links Wikipedia is looking for. Thanks and happy editing.  +++$+++ :I understand you effort to help but the links you inserted are all commercial sites, and that can be seen as advertising. If you review [[WP:EL]] you can see what kind of links Wikipedia is looking for. Thanks and happy editing. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]]</sup> 23:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
542662 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542660 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.164440700E09 +++$+++ Links that provide additional information on the topic but aren't quite suitable for an encyclopedia are a good idea. For example if you look at the [[Pornography]] article, you can see that none of the links are to specific porn sites, but rather about porn.  +++$+++ :::Links that provide additional information on the topic but aren't quite suitable for an encyclopedia are a good idea. For example if you look at the [[Pornography]] article, you can see that none of the links are to specific porn sites, but rather about porn. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]]</sup> 23:45, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
542663 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542660 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.164441000E09 +++$+++ No problem at all, hope you keep up editing. Cheers.  +++$+++ :::::No problem at all, hope you keep up editing. Cheers. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]]</sup> 23:50, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

280517 +++$+++ Zeimusu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-12 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.131833280E09 +++$+++ Hi Hu, I checked the references given at the bottom of the page, and it looks like the edit by the anon user checks out (see [http:\/\/neo.jpl.nasa.gov\/neo\/number.html]) so I reverted. Thanks for being alert to sneaky vandalism.  +++$+++ Hi Hu, I checked the references given at the bottom of the page, and it looks like the edit by the anon user checks out (see [http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/neo/number.html]) so I reverted. Thanks for being alert to sneaky vandalism. [[User:Zeimusu|Zeimusu]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User talk:Zeimusu|Talk page]] 14:08, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
280518 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280517 +++$+++ 280517 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks for the diligence checking references. I'm glad that though I might have made a quick judgement based on the user being anonymous and a first edit, I put enough of a clue in the edit summary that it alerted you to chase it down. Thanks! Hu 17:48, 12 November 2005 (UTC) +++$+++ : Thanks for the diligence checking references. I'm glad that though I might have made a quick judgement based on the user being anonymous and a first edit, I put enough of a clue in the edit summary that it alerted you to chase it down. Thanks! Hu 17:48, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
280519 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280517 +++$+++ 280517 +++$+++ 2005-11-15 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.132109940E09 +++$+++ Thanks, makes sense, I've been giving it a try.  Perhaps certain template tags should automatically substitute when Save Page is clicked.  +++$+++ :Thanks, makes sense, I've been giving it a try.  Perhaps certain template tags should automatically substitute when Save Page is clicked. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 18:59, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

18375 +++$+++ Xlittlecloudx +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-04 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.202126100E09 +++$+++ Wow, cool, I didn't know you were Sissy Comformist from dA! You may know me as sephys-little-cloud. Small world, isn't it? >>; Anyway, yeah, I'm volunteering to patrol N. Gin's article (I hope it stays up -- they want to merge all Crash characters into one article. Blegh.)  +++$+++ Wow, cool, I didn't know you were Sissy Comformist from dA! You may know me as sephys-little-cloud. Small world, isn't it? >>; Anyway, yeah, I'm volunteering to patrol N. Gin's article (I hope it stays up -- they want to merge all Crash characters into one article. Blegh.) [[User:Xlittlecloudx|Xlittlecloudx]] ([[User talk:Xlittlecloudx|talk]]) 03:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
18376 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18375 +++$+++ 18375 +++$+++ 2008-03-06 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.204834020E09 +++$+++ Why, no. I don't believe you have. Would you care to explain why?  +++$+++ :Why, no. I don't believe you have. Would you care to explain why? [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 12:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

542664 +++$+++ gwernol +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542664 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-25 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.164442740E09 +++$+++ You are very welcome, always glad to help,  +++$+++ You are very welcome, always glad to help, [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 00:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
542665 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542664 +++$+++ 542664 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.164443880E09 +++$+++ First of all your edit was a disruptive bad faith edit. Secondly wikipedia is not about freedom of expression, it is about building an encyclopedia. Please Stop.  +++$+++ :First of all your edit was a disruptive bad faith edit. Secondly wikipedia is not about freedom of expression, it is about building an encyclopedia. Please Stop. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]]</sup> 00:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
542666 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542664 +++$+++ 542664 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.164447000E09 +++$+++ I am not from Canada but I agree with Canadian-Bacon Canada is not a failed state. [[User:Betacommand|Betacommand]] <sup>([[User talk:Betacommand|talk]] \u2022 [[Special:Contributions\/Betacommand|contribs]] \u2022  +++$+++ :I am not from Canada but I agree with Canadian-Bacon Canada is not a failed state. [[User:Betacommand|Betacommand]] <sup>([[User talk:Betacommand|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Betacommand|contribs]] • [[User:BetacommandBot|Bot]])</sup> 01:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
542667 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542664 +++$+++ 542664 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164447240E09 +++$+++ Normally I would have no problem with the addition of a failed state if properly sourced. However the source you provide appears to be of a blogger which does not fall under [[WP:RS]]. I am however going to remove the entire list of \"failed states\" as it is completely unsourced. If someone wants to re-source each one they can go right ahead.  +++$+++ :Normally I would have no problem with the addition of a failed state if properly sourced. However the source you provide appears to be of a blogger which does not fall under [[WP:RS]]. I am however going to remove the entire list of "failed states" as it is completely unsourced. If someone wants to re-source each one they can go right ahead. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]]</sup> 01:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
542668 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542664 +++$+++ 542664 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.164453960E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, you haven't been using the sandbox, all your edits have been to the [[Singapore Airlines]] article, and have been extremely offensive. Please Stop.  +++$+++ :Unfortunately, you haven't been using the sandbox, all your edits have been to the [[Singapore Airlines]] article, and have been extremely offensive. Please Stop. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]]</sup> 03:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
542669 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542664 +++$+++ 542664 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.164460500E09 +++$+++ Yes, it does now say that, however at the time it didn't. If you make use of an edit summary, like you did the second time there's a much smaller chance that someone will revert your edits thinking they are vandalism. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Yes, it does now say that, however at the time it didn't. If you make use of an edit summary, like you did the second time there's a much smaller chance that someone will revert your edits thinking they are vandalism. Cheers. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]]</sup> 05:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

18377 +++$+++ BigHairRef +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-07 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.204952160E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from {{#if:Hitoshi Nakata|[[:Hitoshi Nakata]]|Wikipedia}}.  When removing text, please specify a reason in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk page]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the [[Help:Page history|page history]]. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]].  {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: <span class=\"plainlinks\">[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Hitoshi_Nakata&diff=next&oldid=191676070 link]<\/span>. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. <!-- 72-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from {{#if:Hitoshi Nakata|[[:Hitoshi Nakata]]|Wikipedia}}.  When removing text, please specify a reason in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk page]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the [[Help:Page history|page history]]. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]].  {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hitoshi_Nakata&diff=next&oldid=191676070 link]</span>. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. <!-- 72--> [[User:BigHairRef|BigHairRef]] | [[User talk:BigHairRef|Talk]] 20:56, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
18378 +++$+++ YowuzaZXWolfie +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18377 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.219103400E09 +++$+++ Oh sure. You're just like an annoying 6 year old trying to be hard. Not you, Tux. Btw, this  is ADBandicoot, sorry about sockpuppetry, I just want to help Wikipedia with a fresh start. Please don't try to block me or something. -- +++$+++ ::Oh sure. You're just like an annoying 6 year old trying to be hard. Not you, Tux. Btw, this  is ADBandicoot, sorry about sockpuppetry, I just want to help Wikipedia with a fresh start. Please don't try to block me or something. --[[User:YowuzaZXWolfie|YowuzaZXWolfie]] ([[User talk:YowuzaZXWolfie|talk]]) 16:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
18379 +++$+++ YowuzaZXWolfie +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18377 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.219103460E09 +++$+++ I was talking about the IP, so don't. -- +++$+++ ::I was talking about the IP, so don't. --[[User:YowuzaZXWolfie|YowuzaZXWolfie]] ([[User talk:YowuzaZXWolfie|talk]]) 16:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

280523 +++$+++ 83.67.65.99 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-15 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.132103580E09 +++$+++ Boo. You have seen that Wiki is in breach of personal fairness. +++$+++ Boo. You have seen that Wiki is in breach of personal fairness.[[User:83.67.65.99|83.67.65.99]] 17:13, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
280524 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280523 +++$+++ 280523 +++$+++ 2005-11-15 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.132105860E09 +++$+++ Nonsense.  And your vandalism reaction completely shreds any claim you may have had to moral clarity. You have no leg to stand on. Stop.  +++$+++ :Nonsense.  And your vandalism reaction completely shreds any claim you may have had to moral clarity. You have no leg to stand on. Stop. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 17:51, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
280525 +++$+++ ManekiNeko +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280523 +++$+++ 280523 +++$+++ 2005-11-15 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.132113540E09 +++$+++ Heh. He posted from his previously-used (home?) IP this time, making the pattern even clearer.   +++$+++ :Heh. He posted from his previously-used (home?) IP this time, making the pattern even clearer.  [[User:ManekiNeko|ManekiNeko]] | [[User_talk:ManekiNeko|Talk]] 19:59, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

542670 +++$+++ Merzbow +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-25 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.164466380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my user page... if you're curious the vandal is almost certainly the same guy who keeps re-adding defamatory material to [[S. M. Stirling]], which I've been cleaning up. -  +++$+++ Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my user page... if you're curious the vandal is almost certainly the same guy who keeps re-adding defamatory material to [[S. M. Stirling]], which I've been cleaning up. - [[User:Merzbow|Merzbow]] 06:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
542671 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542670 +++$+++ 542670 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.164516240E09 +++$+++ No problem, just please stop vandalising pages.  +++$+++ :No problem, just please stop vandalising pages. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>''-'''''<font color="Black">Bacon</font>''''']]  <sup> [[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Red">''t''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Canadian-Bacon|<font color="Black">''c''</font>]]</sup> 20:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

18383 +++$+++ JuJube +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-03 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.207245900E09 +++$+++ Her given name's commonly (and some would say officially) romanized as \"Houko\", so I'm just curious why you moved it back.  +++$+++ Her given name's commonly (and some would say officially) romanized as "Houko", so I'm just curious why you moved it back. [[User:JuJube|JuJube]] ([[User talk:JuJube|talk]]) 11:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
18384 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18383 +++$+++ 18383 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.207263900E09 +++$+++ According to the Manual of Style (Japan-related articles), it is common practice to romanize such names with macrons as to give the title a cleaner look.  +++$+++ :According to the Manual of Style (Japan-related articles), it is common practice to romanize such names with macrons as to give the title a cleaner look. [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 16:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

280528 +++$+++ GraemeL +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-23 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.132786860E09 +++$+++ I noticed you cleaning up after the [[Special:contributions\/213.184.238.50|213.184.238.50]] spammer. Watch out for his tricks like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Prada&diff=prev&oldid=28745437 this]. It puts an invisible link in the page for SEO purposes. -- +++$+++ I noticed you cleaning up after the [[Special:contributions/213.184.238.50|213.184.238.50]] spammer. Watch out for his tricks like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prada&diff=prev&oldid=28745437 this]. It puts an invisible link in the page for SEO purposes. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 15:01, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
280529 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280528 +++$+++ 280528 +++$+++ 2005-11-23 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.132786980E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I was wondering about that edit.  I let it pass.  I won't in the future, now that I know.  +++$+++ :Thanks, I was wondering about that edit.  I let it pass.  I won't in the future, now that I know. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 15:03, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
280530 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280528 +++$+++ 280528 +++$+++ 2005-11-25 10:18:00 +++$+++ 1.132942680E09 +++$+++ 6) Now, please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :6) Now, please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 10:18, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
280531 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280528 +++$+++ 280528 +++$+++ 2005-12-07 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.134002820E09 +++$+++ It's junk, unencyclopedic, and you don't have the strength of your convictions to sign or register.   +++$+++ :It's junk, unencyclopedic, and you don't have the strength of your convictions to sign or register.  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 16:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

18387 +++$+++ Gary King +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-16 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.210922520E09 +++$+++ Please don't do that without going through the proper procedures, found at [[Wikipedia:Featured_topic_candidates\/Nomination_procedure#Adding_new_articles_to_an_existing_topic]].  +++$+++ Please don't do that without going through the proper procedures, found at [[Wikipedia:Featured_topic_candidates/Nomination_procedure#Adding_new_articles_to_an_existing_topic]]. [[User:Gary King|<font color="#02e">Gary</font>&nbsp;<font color="#02b"><b><font size="+1"><i>K</i></font>ing</b></font>]]&nbsp;<font size="-1">([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 00:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
18388 +++$+++ Gary King +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18387 +++$+++ 18387 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.210924740E09 +++$+++ I have no idea what you are talking about. I am talking about your addition of an article to the Zelda FT.  +++$+++ : I have no idea what you are talking about. I am talking about your addition of an article to the Zelda FT. [[User:Gary King|<font color="#02e">Gary</font>&nbsp;<font color="#02b"><b><font size="+1"><i>K</i></font>ing</b></font>]]&nbsp;<font size="-1">([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 00:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

280532 +++$+++ Ferret-aaron +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280532 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-11 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.134355500E09 +++$+++ I notice you recently edited [[History of science fiction]]. I have been working on an overhaul of that article, which I just placed at [[History of science fiction\/rewrite]]. Please comment on my rewrite and whether it should replace the current article at History of Science Fiction's Talk page.  +++$+++ I notice you recently edited [[History of science fiction]]. I have been working on an overhaul of that article, which I just placed at [[History of science fiction/rewrite]]. Please comment on my rewrite and whether it should replace the current article at History of Science Fiction's Talk page. [[User:Ferret-aaron|Ferret-aaron]] 18:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
280533 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280532 +++$+++ 280532 +++$+++ 2005-12-12 15:25:00 +++$+++ 1.134429900E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the work re-writing and for the invitation.  I have replied on the rewrite's discussion page.  +++$+++ :Thank you for the work re-writing and for the invitation.  I have replied on the rewrite's discussion page. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 15:25, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

352590 +++$+++ 85.23.32.64 +++$+++ Denelson83 +++$+++ 352590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-18 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.255914900E09 +++$+++ In September 2008, you requested an SVG version of [[:File:Flgraphic.png]].  I made such a version today with Inkspace and Emacs.  The PNG file is 29365 bytes; the SVG is 39326 bytes but gzip compresses it to 5685. Before uploading this, I'd like to verify the licence.  The PNG has been tagged as being in the public domain in the United States, but what does that mean for me in the EU?  Was the picture published by the US government and when?  The PNG has been derived from [[:File:Flgraphic.jpg]], but that one has apparently been deleted from Wikipedia and I can't find any copyright information about it.  [[Special:Contributions\/85.23.32.64|85.23.32.64]] ( +++$+++ In September 2008, you requested an SVG version of [[:File:Flgraphic.png]].  I made such a version today with Inkspace and Emacs.  The PNG file is 29365 bytes; the SVG is 39326 bytes but gzip compresses it to 5685. Before uploading this, I'd like to verify the licence.  The PNG has been tagged as being in the public domain in the United States, but what does that mean for me in the EU?  Was the picture published by the US government and when?  The PNG has been derived from [[:File:Flgraphic.jpg]], but that one has apparently been deleted from Wikipedia and I can't find any copyright information about it.  [[Special:Contributions/85.23.32.64|85.23.32.64]] ([[User talk:85.23.32.64|talk]]) 18:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
352591 +++$+++ 85.23.32.64 +++$+++ Denelson83 +++$+++ 352590 +++$+++ 352590 +++$+++ 2009-10-24 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.256404800E09 +++$+++ The JPEG may have been scanned from some paper published by NACO.  [http:\/\/www.naco.faa.gov\/index.asp?xml=naco\/faq Their FAQ] says that their publications are in the public domain but warns against using expired data.  Because the graphic has no date on it saying when it was in effect, I'm not going to upload the SVG.  Thanks for your help.  [[Special:Contributions\/85.23.32.64|85.23.32.64]] ( +++$+++ :The JPEG may have been scanned from some paper published by NACO.  [http://www.naco.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=naco/faq Their FAQ] says that their publications are in the public domain but warns against using expired data.  Because the graphic has no date on it saying when it was in effect, I'm not going to upload the SVG.  Thanks for your help.  [[Special:Contributions/85.23.32.64|85.23.32.64]] ([[User talk:85.23.32.64|talk]]) 10:20, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

280534 +++$+++ Wiki_alf +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-12 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.134423420E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that's the one ([[Hugo]]) I couldn't find to make it seven! (Had to check as an anon edit changed seven to four). Thanks.  +++$+++ Thanks, that's the one ([[Hugo]]) I couldn't find to make it seven! (Had to check as an anon edit changed seven to four). Thanks. [[User:Wiki_alf|Alf]] <sup><font color="green">[[User_talk:Wiki_alf|melmac]]</font></sup> 13:37, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
280535 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280534 +++$+++ 280534 +++$+++ 2005-12-12 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.134423720E09 +++$+++ You are welcome!  +++$+++ :You are welcome! [[User:Hu|Hu]] 13:42, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

18392 +++$+++ TheExtruder +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18392 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-13 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.218649980E09 +++$+++ Hi mate, the [[Crash_Twinsanity]] article appears to be under attack from fanboys again, I might need your Wiki skills to get rid of them once again!  +++$+++ Hi mate, the [[Crash_Twinsanity]] article appears to be under attack from fanboys again, I might need your Wiki skills to get rid of them once again! [[User:TheExtruder|TheExtruder]] ([[User talk:TheExtruder|talk]]) 10:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
18393 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18392 +++$+++ 18392 +++$+++ 2008-09-05 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.220670660E09 +++$+++ I believe you are the vandal here. You're the one deleting valuable information necessary for verification of notability. And don't think anyone will take your side if you keep acting like that. Good day, sir.  +++$+++ :I believe you are the vandal here. You're the one deleting valuable information necessary for verification of notability. And don't think anyone will take your side if you keep acting like that. Good day, sir. [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 20:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

280538 +++$+++ BobMaestro +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-16 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.134739560E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you edited my changes to the Taoism page recently. I did not realize that changing Taoism to Daoism would be a big deal, and I apologize for not bringing it up before making said changes. Please forgive me, I am relatively new here.  +++$+++ I noticed that you edited my changes to the Taoism page recently. I did not realize that changing Taoism to Daoism would be a big deal, and I apologize for not bringing it up before making said changes. Please forgive me, I am relatively new here. [[User:BobMaestro|BobMaestro]] 05:26, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
280539 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280538 +++$+++ 280538 +++$+++ 2005-12-16 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.134742140E09 +++$+++ Forgiven, happily.  I encourage you to continue being bold, as Wikipedia advises, despite the occasional setback.  I've had my own edits reverted occasionally and, also, I've not always been right about my reversions of other's work.  But with a little time and experience it becomes easier.  +++$+++ :Forgiven, happily.  I encourage you to continue being bold, as Wikipedia advises, despite the occasional setback.  I've had my own edits reverted occasionally and, also, I've not always been right about my reversions of other's work.  But with a little time and experience it becomes easier. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 06:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
280540 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280538 +++$+++ 280538 +++$+++ 2005-12-18 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.134906300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for catching that!  I had meant to revert only the one edit, but I had been a little sloppy by reverting after a history comparison of multiple edits.  I fixed it.  +++$+++ :Thanks for catching that!  I had meant to revert only the one edit, but I had been a little sloppy by reverting after a history comparison of multiple edits.  I fixed it. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 03:45, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

542683 +++$+++ 142.104.214.186 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.165976760E09 +++$+++ Don't you think it was a hilarious edit?  +++$+++ Don't you think it was a hilarious edit? [[User:142.104.214.186|142.104.214.186]] 18:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
542684 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542683 +++$+++ 542683 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.165976820E09 +++$+++ Despite the fact that you may have thought it was hilarious, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not somewhere to post jokes.  +++$+++ :Despite the fact that you may have thought it was hilarious, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not somewhere to post jokes. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>'']]-[[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|'''''<font color="Black">Bacon'''''</font>]] 18:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
542685 +++$+++ 142.104.214.186 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542683 +++$+++ 542684 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.165977000E09 +++$+++ Despite the fact that what you say is true, you forgot to answer the question!  +++$+++ ::Despite the fact that what you say is true, you forgot to answer the question! [[User:142.104.214.186|142.104.214.186]] 18:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
542686 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542683 +++$+++ 542685 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.165977120E09 +++$+++ Wasn't funny.  +++$+++ :::Wasn't funny. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>'']]-[[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|'''''<font color="Black">Bacon'''''</font>]] 18:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
542687 +++$+++ 142.104.214.186 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542683 +++$+++ 542686 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.165977480E09 +++$+++ Oh, c'mon. You're just saying that so as not to encourage me. The shortness of you reply makes that obvious. You know, like someone who mumbles a response, then a half-grin forces itself onto their face as they're unable to continue the deception. I promise I won't do it again even if you think it was funny (not to mention the fact that you'd block my ip).  +++$+++ :::: Oh, c'mon. You're just saying that so as not to encourage me. The shortness of you reply makes that obvious. You know, like someone who mumbles a response, then a half-grin forces itself onto their face as they're unable to continue the deception. I promise I won't do it again even if you think it was funny (not to mention the fact that you'd block my ip). [[User:142.104.214.186|142.104.214.186]] 18:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
542688 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542683 +++$+++ 542687 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.165977900E09 +++$+++ As much as I'd love to say that it was funny. unfortunately it's exam time in the world, and my sense of humor is at it's bi-yearly lowest level. And thank you for stopping.  +++$+++ :::::As much as I'd love to say that it was funny. unfortunately it's exam time in the world, and my sense of humor is at it's bi-yearly lowest level. And thank you for stopping. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>'']]-[[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|'''''<font color="Black">Bacon'''''</font>]] 18:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
542689 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542683 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.165979640E09 +++$+++ Economics is next on the list, which as most people know, is just the most fun course ever.  +++$+++ :::::::Economics is next on the list, which as most people know, is just the most fun course ever. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>'']]-[[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|'''''<font color="Black">Bacon'''''</font>]] 19:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
542690 +++$+++ 142.104.214.186 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542683 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.165981920E09 +++$+++ Well, good luck with it.  +++$+++ ::::::::Well, good luck with it. [[User:142.104.214.186|142.104.214.186]] 19:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

18397 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-09 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.226296440E09 +++$+++ If you get a chance, could you try to cut it down to about two paragraphs per character (if even that much)? Character lists just need to provide an overview of the characters, while noting anything extremely specific in the games. That list just drops every single appearance into each section, which is very unnecessary. The main articles can cover the plot perfectly fine. The list should be used so that the character information doesn't have to be repeated within those articles. It probably shouldn't be above 20kb in the end, allowing it to easily be merged with the other list.  +++$+++ If you get a chance, could you try to cut it down to about two paragraphs per character (if even that much)? Character lists just need to provide an overview of the characters, while noting anything extremely specific in the games. That list just drops every single appearance into each section, which is very unnecessary. The main articles can cover the plot perfectly fine. The list should be used so that the character information doesn't have to be repeated within those articles. It probably shouldn't be above 20kb in the end, allowing it to easily be merged with the other list. [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 21:54, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
18398 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18397 +++$+++ 18397 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.229248260E09 +++$+++ Do you have any specific objections with doing this? I imagine you'd probably revert it if I cut it way down, so it would be preferable if you could manage it yourself.  +++$+++ :Do you have any specific objections with doing this? I imagine you'd probably revert it if I cut it way down, so it would be preferable if you could manage it yourself. [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 01:51, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
18399 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18397 +++$+++ 18398 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.229250480E09 +++$+++ Well, not really. It's just that I'm not really sure how we're going to go about doing it. The major characters of the series have appeared in a significant amount of video games (ranging from five to fifteen), so it'd be difficult to cut each down to two paragraphs, but none of them have enough real-world notability to constitute their own articles yet (my main reason for making the 'Major characters' page in the first place). Plus, there's the backlash we'll most likely encounter from the fanbase if we go through with it.  +++$+++ ::Well, not really. It's just that I'm not really sure how we're going to go about doing it. The major characters of the series have appeared in a significant amount of video games (ranging from five to fifteen), so it'd be difficult to cut each down to two paragraphs, but none of them have enough real-world notability to constitute their own articles yet (my main reason for making the 'Major characters' page in the first place). Plus, there's the backlash we'll most likely encounter from the fanbase if we go through with it. [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 02:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
18400 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18397 +++$+++ 18399 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.229251860E09 +++$+++ You should just completely ignore mentioning any of the games unless they present a major change within the character. The plot sections of the games themselves can handle the other details. The actual content of their sections should just be dedicated to establishing the characters' personalities and backgrounds. The history will still be there if you happen to find enough development and reception to split them out. If there is a problem where an actual consensus is required, I'm sure it would be easy enough to obtain one by posting a discussion on the video game project.  +++$+++ :::You should just completely ignore mentioning any of the games unless they present a major change within the character. The plot sections of the games themselves can handle the other details. The actual content of their sections should just be dedicated to establishing the characters' personalities and backgrounds. The history will still be there if you happen to find enough development and reception to split them out. If there is a problem where an actual consensus is required, I'm sure it would be easy enough to obtain one by posting a discussion on the video game project. [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 02:51, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

280543 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280543 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-22 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.135241160E09 +++$+++ just a note for future reference - you stubbed [[West Frisia]] with {{tl|Netherlands-stub}} and {{tl|geo-stub}}...[[North Frisia]] with {{tl|Germany-stub}} and {{tl|geo-stub}}... and [[Therhalli]] with {{tl|India-stub}} and {{tl|geo-stub}}. Most countries (and all the bigger countries) have their own geo-stubs now - it would have been quicker for you and for others if you'd just used {{tl|Netherlands-geo-stub}}, {{tl|Germany-geo-stub}} and {{tl|India-geo-stub}} :)  +++$+++ just a note for future reference - you stubbed [[West Frisia]] with {{tl|Netherlands-stub}} and {{tl|geo-stub}}...[[North Frisia]] with {{tl|Germany-stub}} and {{tl|geo-stub}}... and [[Therhalli]] with {{tl|India-stub}} and {{tl|geo-stub}}. Most countries (and all the bigger countries) have their own geo-stubs now - it would have been quicker for you and for others if you'd just used {{tl|Netherlands-geo-stub}}, {{tl|Germany-geo-stub}} and {{tl|India-geo-stub}} :) [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
280544 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280543 +++$+++ 280543 +++$+++ 2005-12-22 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.135243140E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I looked for but couldn't find a Frisia stub.  +++$+++ :Thanks.  I looked for but couldn't find a Frisia stub. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 01:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
280545 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280543 +++$+++ 280543 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ ''(for reference here is what I wrote on Aidan Work's talk page:)''  Please adhere to Wikipedia style. In particular, please look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style and other guides. Articles should not be self referential. That means not to start an article as \"This article ...\". Introductions to articles should not have section headings, especially titled \"Introduction\". Section headings should not use a period after the words. Symbols and single digit numbers in general should be spelled out, so that ampersand becomes \"and\" and \"2\" becomes \"two\". Hu 05:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC) +++$+++ :''(for reference here is what I wrote on Aidan Work's talk page:)''  Please adhere to Wikipedia style. In particular, please look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style and other guides. Articles should not be self referential. That means not to start an article as "This article ...". Introductions to articles should not have section headings, especially titled "Introduction". Section headings should not use a period after the words. Symbols and single digit numbers in general should be spelled out, so that ampersand becomes "and" and "2" becomes "two". Hu 05:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
280546 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280543 +++$+++ 280543 +++$+++ 2005-12-22 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.135262160E09 +++$+++ You articles reference themselves by saying \"This article...\".  That goes against [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]].  You will also notice that almost zero articles on Wikipedia do this.  Using full stops (periods) at the end of section headings is against Wikipedia style.  You will notice that almost zero articles on Wikipedia do this, too.  I can't recall a single one, other than your articles.  Using the ampersand to represent \"and\" is not Wikipedia style.  Once again, you will find a vanishing small fraction of Wikipedia articles that do this.  Nothing is wrong with \"a historic event\" or \"an honorable\" person and I didn't object to that.   +++$+++ :You articles reference themselves by saying "This article...".  That goes against [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]].  You will also notice that almost zero articles on Wikipedia do this.  Using full stops (periods) at the end of section headings is against Wikipedia style.  You will notice that almost zero articles on Wikipedia do this, too.  I can't recall a single one, other than your articles.  Using the ampersand to represent "and" is not Wikipedia style.  Once again, you will find a vanishing small fraction of Wikipedia articles that do this.  Nothing is wrong with "a historic event" or "an honorable" person and I didn't object to that.  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 06:36, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

280547 +++$+++ JesseW +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-25 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.135524960E09 +++$+++ Just came across your cleanup of [[Eli Franklin Burton]], and I wanted to say thanks.  It's always nice to see the inclusion of a ''reference'' in an article. Keep up the good work!  +++$+++ Just came across your cleanup of [[Eli Franklin Burton]], and I wanted to say thanks.  It's always nice to see the inclusion of a ''reference'' in an article. Keep up the good work! [[User:JesseW/sig|JesseW, the juggling janitor]] 07:36, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
280548 +++$+++ OwenX +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280547 +++$+++ 280547 +++$+++ 2005-12-26 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.135644840E09 +++$+++ This seems to be a misguided user who simply doesn't understand how categories work. However, as he is noncommunicative, there's no point in trying to reason or educate him, regrettably. Hopefully, this short block will get his attention. As this is a first block of a user with some valid edits, I'm reluctant to apply a longer block. Let me know if he continues in the same pattern when the block expires.  +++$+++ :This seems to be a misguided user who simply doesn't understand how categories work. However, as he is noncommunicative, there's no point in trying to reason or educate him, regrettably. Hopefully, this short block will get his attention. As this is a first block of a user with some valid edits, I'm reluctant to apply a longer block. Let me know if he continues in the same pattern when the block expires. [[User:OwenX|Owen&times;]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>&#9742;</big>]] 16:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
280549 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280547 +++$+++ 280547 +++$+++ 2005-12-26 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.135661400E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I will look at the [[Talk:Space elevator]] page later.  You can use four tildes to automatically sign your posts on Talk pages. (<nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>).  +++$+++ :Thanks.  I will look at the [[Talk:Space elevator]] page later.  You can use four tildes to automatically sign your posts on Talk pages. (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). [[User:Hu|Hu]] 21:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

18405 +++$+++ Yowuza +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18405 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-05 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.228531140E09 +++$+++ Have you seen this article? I don't think it should be here considering the only reliable sources seem to be Crash Mania.  +++$+++ Have you seen this article? I don't think it should be here considering the only reliable sources seem to be Crash Mania. [[User:Yowuza|<font face="Matisse ITC" >YOWUZA</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Yowuza|Talk 2 me!]]</small> 18:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
18406 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18405 +++$+++ 18405 +++$+++ 2008-12-05 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.228533720E09 +++$+++ Yes, I have, and I agree that it should be deleted, or at least merged into the [[Crash Bandicoot (series)]] article. I thought it'd be speedily deleted, which is why I didn't report it earlier.  +++$+++ :Yes, I have, and I agree that it should be deleted, or at least merged into the [[Crash Bandicoot (series)]] article. I thought it'd be speedily deleted, which is why I didn't report it earlier. [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 19:22, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

280550 +++$+++ Nrcprm2026 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-28 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.135826400E09 +++$+++ I love your work on the inset Image:Carbon Dioxide 400kyr-2.png at [[global warming]].  Do you think you can do the same thing to Image:Carbon History and Flux.png at [[greenhouse gas]]? -- +++$+++ I love your work on the inset Image:Carbon Dioxide 400kyr-2.png at [[global warming]].  Do you think you can do the same thing to Image:Carbon History and Flux.png at [[greenhouse gas]]? --[[User:Nrcprm2026|<small><b>James S.</b></small>]] 19:20, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
280551 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280550 +++$+++ 280550 +++$+++ 2005-12-29 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.135850040E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  I've improved the image that you asked for and I hope you like it as well.  +++$+++ :Thank you.  I've improved the image that you asked for and I hope you like it as well. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 01:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
280552 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280550 +++$+++ 280550 +++$+++ 2005-12-30 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.135936980E09 +++$+++ The [[Commonwealth of Nations]] has chosen to call itself \"The Commonwealth of Nations\" and there is no good reason not to respect that.  That is why British Commonwealth is not the article title and is only a redirect.  The function of an encyclopedia such as Wikipedia is not to perpetuate false notions, but to describe things in the proper modern terminology so that people can become informed about it and familiar with the proper names.  The Oxford English Dictionary emphasizes the political aspect of \"nation\" in the first sentence of the definitions.  Your preference about what you consider strictly correct or incorrect is not the determinative rule.   +++$+++ :The [[Commonwealth of Nations]] has chosen to call itself "The Commonwealth of Nations" and there is no good reason not to respect that.  That is why British Commonwealth is not the article title and is only a redirect.  The function of an encyclopedia such as Wikipedia is not to perpetuate false notions, but to describe things in the proper modern terminology so that people can become informed about it and familiar with the proper names.  The Oxford English Dictionary emphasizes the political aspect of "nation" in the first sentence of the definitions.  Your preference about what you consider strictly correct or incorrect is not the determinative rule.  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 02:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
280553 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280550 +++$+++ 280550 +++$+++ 2006-01-04 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.136364240E09 +++$+++ Re: [[Postal Orders of Negeri Sembilan]]:  I will state it as many times as needed for you to understand it:  An encyclopedia does '''not''' exist to perpetuate incorrect information.  That is the reason that there is a redirect from the incorrect spelling to the correct spelling, which is the spelling that Malaysia mandates, their choice, not yours, not mine, not Stanley Gibbons, not Wikipedia's, just the fact.  There is no reason you can't mention the Stanley Gibbons spelling in the first paragraph, to make things explicit and clear.  But you do not have free reign to perpetuate misinformation.  +++$+++ :Re: [[Postal Orders of Negeri Sembilan]]:  I will state it as many times as needed for you to understand it:  An encyclopedia does '''not''' exist to perpetuate incorrect information.  That is the reason that there is a redirect from the incorrect spelling to the correct spelling, which is the spelling that Malaysia mandates, their choice, not yours, not mine, not Stanley Gibbons, not Wikipedia's, just the fact.  There is no reason you can't mention the Stanley Gibbons spelling in the first paragraph, to make things explicit and clear.  But you do not have free reign to perpetuate misinformation. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 00:44, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
280554 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280550 +++$+++ 280550 +++$+++ 2006-01-04 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.136363100E09 +++$+++ The comment on the [[Talk:Postal Order]] page regarding a merge-out is still valid:  \"postal orders are ''not'' exclusive to Great Britain\".  +++$+++ :The comment on the [[Talk:Postal Order]] page regarding a merge-out is still valid:  "postal orders are ''not'' exclusive to Great Britain". [[User:Hu|Hu]] 00:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

18409 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-22 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.248322380E09 +++$+++ If none of the following exist, then use macron names. The Neon Genesis Evangelion series uses non-macron names in official website materials, translated materials, etc.  +++$+++ If none of the following exist, then use macron names. The Neon Genesis Evangelion series uses non-macron names in official website materials, translated materials, etc. [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 21:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
18410 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18409 +++$+++ 18409 +++$+++ 2009-09-19 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.253361660E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I've noticed that. I really wish something could be done about that.  +++$+++ :Yeah, I've noticed that. I really wish something could be done about that. [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 05:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

18411 +++$+++ KrebMarkt +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-07 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.265597340E09 +++$+++ Cordially. -- +++$+++ Cordially. --[[User:KrebMarkt|KrebMarkt]] 18:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
18412 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18411 +++$+++ 18411 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.265599140E09 +++$+++ I apologize for the inconvenience I'm apparently causing. It's just that the Japanese articles that I translate usually don't feature references either, so there's really not much I can do about it.  +++$+++ :I apologize for the inconvenience I'm apparently causing. It's just that the Japanese articles that I translate usually don't feature references either, so there's really not much I can do about it. [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 19:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
18413 +++$+++ KrebMarkt +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18411 +++$+++ 18412 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.265605140E09 +++$+++ Japanese sources are Ok as long they are reliable that usually anime official website, TV network anime dedicated webpage\/website or Anime studio websites. That would do for most anime roles with the reserve that older is the show and harder it's to find a source -- +++$+++ ::Japanese sources are Ok as long they are reliable that usually anime official website, TV network anime dedicated webpage/website or Anime studio websites. That would do for most anime roles with the reserve that older is the show and harder it's to find a source --[[User:KrebMarkt|KrebMarkt]] 20:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

280557 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280557 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-04 10:10:00 +++$+++ 1.136398200E09 +++$+++ Please take more care when tagging items for speedy deletion. This was not vanity fiction, but an article about a film in the series called [[The Land Before Time]] produced by [[Steven Spielberg]]'s [[Amblin Entertainment]], which is quite obvious from the Google links. Please make sure you check before tagging something. -  +++$+++ Please take more care when tagging items for speedy deletion. This was not vanity fiction, but an article about a film in the series called [[The Land Before Time]] produced by [[Steven Spielberg]]'s [[Amblin Entertainment]], which is quite obvious from the Google links. Please make sure you check before tagging something. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 10:10, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
280558 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280557 +++$+++ 280557 +++$+++ 2006-01-04 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.136404320E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I did google, but not carefully enough.  Your advice is noted.  Did you offer the corresponding advice to the new user, i.e. advising the user to apply appropriate context to edits?  I see that you haven't.  To atone for my sins, I changed my test notice on the user talk page to a Welcome, almost immediately, before your note here.   +++$+++ :Thanks.  I did google, but not carefully enough.  Your advice is noted.  Did you offer the corresponding advice to the new user, i.e. advising the user to apply appropriate context to edits?  I see that you haven't.  To atone for my sins, I changed my test notice on the user talk page to a Welcome, almost immediately, before your note here.  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 11:52, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
280559 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280557 +++$+++ 280557 +++$+++ 2006-01-04 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.136404740E09 +++$+++ Thanks :) -  +++$+++ *Thanks :) - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 11:59, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

18414 +++$+++ 168.99.144.58 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18414 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-08 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.265689320E09 +++$+++ i [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Crash_Bandicoot:_The_Wrath_of_Cortex&diff=next&oldid=340776548 was] using the general term you [[Special:Contributions\/168.99.144.58|168.99.144.58]] ( +++$+++ i [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crash_Bandicoot:_The_Wrath_of_Cortex&diff=next&oldid=340776548 was] using the general term you [[Special:Contributions/168.99.144.58|168.99.144.58]] ([[User talk:168.99.144.58|talk]]) 20:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
18415 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18414 +++$+++ 18414 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.265698980E09 +++$+++ Second-person language (such as \"you\") is inappropriate on Wikipedia because it addresses the reader directly, which encyclopedias don't and shouldn't do. Only third-person language (such as \"the player\") is allowed.  +++$+++ :Second-person language (such as "you") is inappropriate on Wikipedia because it addresses the reader directly, which encyclopedias don't and shouldn't do. Only third-person language (such as "the player") is allowed. [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 23:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
18416 +++$+++ 168.99.144.58 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18414 +++$+++ 18415 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.265774220E09 +++$+++ well yeah but why's it inappropriate? there's nothing bad in it [[Special:Contributions\/168.99.144.58|168.99.144.58]] ( +++$+++ ::well yeah but why's it inappropriate? there's nothing bad in it [[Special:Contributions/168.99.144.58|168.99.144.58]] ([[User talk:168.99.144.58|talk]]) 19:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
18417 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18414 +++$+++ 18416 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.265786100E09 +++$+++ Use of the term \"you\" on Wikipedia results in ambiguity and is contrary to the tone of encyclopedias. As such, it is discouraged to use the word \"you\" in the article unless it is part of a quote. It is preferable to refer to the subject of the sentence or use the [[English passive voice]] when editing articles.  +++$+++ :::Use of the term "you" on Wikipedia results in ambiguity and is contrary to the tone of encyclopedias. As such, it is discouraged to use the word "you" in the article unless it is part of a quote. It is preferable to refer to the subject of the sentence or use the [[English passive voice]] when editing articles. [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 23:15, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

280560 +++$+++ Morwen +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-04 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.136405460E09 +++$+++ Hi.  Adding the Sprotect tag itself to a page does nothing, which is why it was described as 'fake'.  Protection is an admin function excercised by the a special tab.  Looking in the protection log (look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Louis+Braille]), the page is not currently protected.   +++$+++ Hi.  Adding the Sprotect tag itself to a page does nothing, which is why it was described as 'fake'.  Protection is an admin function excercised by the a special tab.  Looking in the protection log (look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Louis+Braille]), the page is not currently protected.  [[User:Morwen|Morwen]] - [[User_talk:Morwen|Talk]] 12:11, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
280561 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280560 +++$+++ 280560 +++$+++ 2006-01-04 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.136405580E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  It really does need to be protected.  +++$+++ :Thanks.  It really does need to be protected. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 12:13, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
280562 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280560 +++$+++ 280560 +++$+++ 2006-01-06 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.136553960E09 +++$+++ With reference to the [[Coins of Upper Canada]] and the [[Coins of the Magdalen Islands|Coin of the Magdalen Islands]], I have not forgotten that the British Commonwealth was the successor.  Nor have I forgotten that the [[Commonwealth of Nations]] is the successor to the British Commonwealth.  What you have forgotten is that at the time of the issues, the Commonwealth did not yet exist, but the Empire was in existence.  Collectors of Commonwealth coins are often also collectors of Empire coins and vice versa, but in an encyclopedia, it is important to be accurate about the distinction.   +++$+++ :With reference to the [[Coins of Upper Canada]] and the [[Coins of the Magdalen Islands|Coin of the Magdalen Islands]], I have not forgotten that the British Commonwealth was the successor.  Nor have I forgotten that the [[Commonwealth of Nations]] is the successor to the British Commonwealth.  What you have forgotten is that at the time of the issues, the Commonwealth did not yet exist, but the Empire was in existence.  Collectors of Commonwealth coins are often also collectors of Empire coins and vice versa, but in an encyclopedia, it is important to be accurate about the distinction.  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 05:26, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

571048 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571048 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-25 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.161787140E09 +++$+++ If you look at Wikiwar you can see that the situation is crazy.  We and wikipeace are the only neutral nations.  Shall we fight, or shall we profiteer from this war? Contact me with your ideas.  ''' +++$+++ If you look at Wikiwar you can see that the situation is crazy.  We and wikipeace are the only neutral nations.  Shall we fight, or shall we profiteer from this war? Contact me with your ideas.  '''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 07:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
571049 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571048 +++$+++ 571048 +++$+++ 2006-10-25 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.161789960E09 +++$+++ One word: [[Embargo]]. Our time will come. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :One word: [[Embargo]]. Our time will come. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 08:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
571050 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571048 +++$+++ 571049 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.161963780E09 +++$+++ Read the wiki war disscussion page.  We will have to make a active list of planets and territories that we control.  The way wars are fought has drastically changed as well.  ''' +++$+++ ::Read the wiki war disscussion page.  We will have to make a active list of planets and territories that we control.  The way wars are fought has drastically changed as well.  '''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 08:43, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
571051 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571048 +++$+++ 571050 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.161969180E09 +++$+++ K, it seems like alot of work - so let's both do it. ''Wikimperialis!'' [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::K, it seems like alot of work - so let's both do it. ''Wikimperialis!'' [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 10:13, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
571052 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571048 +++$+++ 571051 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.161970020E09 +++$+++ You got it.  Viva Imperialis!  ''' +++$+++ ::::You got it.  Viva Imperialis!  '''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 10:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

280563 +++$+++ Jeffrey O. Gustafson +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280563 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-14 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.137282780E09 +++$+++ I'll be damned... Who'da thunk that there wasn't a page for [[Demon with a Glass Hand]] yet?  Good work.  --[[User:Jeffrey O. Gustafson|Jeffrey O. Gustafson]] - '' +++$+++ I'll be damned... Who'da thunk that there wasn't a page for [[Demon with a Glass Hand]] yet?  Good work.  --[[User:Jeffrey O. Gustafson|Jeffrey O. Gustafson]] - ''[[User:Jeffrey O. Gustafson/Shazaam|Shazaam!]]'' - [[User_Talk:Jeffrey O. Gustafson|&lt;*&gt;]] 15:53, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
280564 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280563 +++$+++ 280563 +++$+++ 2006-01-14 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.137282840E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Hu|Hu]] 15:54, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

280565 +++$+++ E Pluribus Anthony +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280565 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-16 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.137462600E09 +++$+++ This isn't or shouldn't be a huge issue, though.  Let me know if you've any questions.   +++$+++ This isn't or shouldn't be a huge issue, though.  Let me know if you've any questions.  [[User:E Pluribus Anthony|E Pluribus Anthony]] | [[User talk:E Pluribus Anthony|''talk'']] | 17:50, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
280566 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280565 +++$+++ 280565 +++$+++ 2006-01-16 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.137467580E09 +++$+++ I thought I had read the reference carefully, but I had not.  Thanks to your note here, I went back and re-read it.  As a result, I restored the quote to the article.  I was trying to avoid the proliferation of inappropriate quotes by biblical dominionists that have been popping up in non-NPoV ways in various articles, but this one is appropriate because it supported by historical fact.  Sorry for any consternation.  +++$+++ :I thought I had read the reference carefully, but I had not.  Thanks to your note here, I went back and re-read it.  As a result, I restored the quote to the article.  I was trying to avoid the proliferation of inappropriate quotes by biblical dominionists that have been popping up in non-NPoV ways in various articles, but this one is appropriate because it supported by historical fact.  Sorry for any consternation. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 19:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
280567 +++$+++ E Pluribus Anthony +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280565 +++$+++ 280566 +++$+++ 2006-01-16 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.137468600E09 +++$+++ I'm gonna edit your edit mildly; let me know if you've any questions.  Thanks again!  :)   +++$+++ ::I'm gonna edit your edit mildly; let me know if you've any questions.  Thanks again!  :)  [[User:E Pluribus Anthony|E Pluribus Anthony]] | [[User talk:E Pluribus Anthony|''talk'']] | 19:30, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
280568 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280565 +++$+++ 280565 +++$+++ 2006-01-17 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.137533640E09 +++$+++ I think you are confused again.  Look at the history of the [[Rhodesian Honours System]] article and you will see that I have not touched that page. If anybody is politically offensive, it is you, the way on talk pages you call some groups of people \"subhuman\" and the way you push your monarchist and Ulster agendas around Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :I think you are confused again.  Look at the history of the [[Rhodesian Honours System]] article and you will see that I have not touched that page. If anybody is politically offensive, it is you, the way on talk pages you call some groups of people "subhuman" and the way you push your monarchist and Ulster agendas around Wikipedia. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 13:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
280569 +++$+++ FreplySpang +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280565 +++$+++ 280568 +++$+++ 2006-01-17 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.137551940E09 +++$+++ This confused me too, when he brought it up on [[WP:AN]]. He is referring to your text in [[:Category:British Commonwealth Honours Systems]]. When he went to categorize [[Rhodesian Honours System]], he accidentally included the Category description by using curly braces instead of square brackets: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rhodesian_Honours_System&oldid=35501873]. So your text appeared to be in the article. And yes, Aidan most certainly does need to modulate his tone if he wants to work within Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :: This confused me too, when he brought it up on [[WP:AN]]. He is referring to your text in [[:Category:British Commonwealth Honours Systems]]. When he went to categorize [[Rhodesian Honours System]], he accidentally included the Category description by using curly braces instead of square brackets: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rhodesian_Honours_System&oldid=35501873]. So your text appeared to be in the article. And yes, Aidan most certainly does need to modulate his tone if he wants to work within Wikipedia. [[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] [[User talk:FreplySpang|(talk)]] 18:39, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
280570 +++$+++ FreplySpang +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280565 +++$+++ 280569 +++$+++ 2006-01-17 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.137562440E09 +++$+++ Re: renaming the category to \"Commonwealth Honours Systems\". In my opinion, this category could just go away, and the articles could go in [[:Category:Orders and decorations]]. If there is going to be such a category, then I think \"Commonwealth honours systems\" would be a fine title. Thanks for your cleanup work, by the way!  +++$+++ ::: Re: renaming the category to "Commonwealth Honours Systems". In my opinion, this category could just go away, and the articles could go in [[:Category:Orders and decorations]]. If there is going to be such a category, then I think "Commonwealth honours systems" would be a fine title. Thanks for your cleanup work, by the way! [[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] [[User talk:FreplySpang|(talk)]] 21:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

542713 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-23 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.166877120E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on your most successful RfA! :-) As you can see, you are now in [[Wikipedia:Times_that_100_Wikipedians_supported_something#Requests_for_adminship:|WP:100]]! Wow. Have fun with your new tools and upgrade to vandalkiller. ;-) Best regards,--<strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ Congratulations on your most successful RfA! :-) As you can see, you are now in [[Wikipedia:Times_that_100_Wikipedians_supported_something#Requests_for_adminship:|WP:100]]! Wow. Have fun with your new tools and upgrade to vandalkiller. ;-) Best regards,--<strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 04:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
542714 +++$+++ Samir_(The_Scope) +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542713 +++$+++ 542713 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.166907960E09 +++$+++ Congrats and well done!  Another great addition to the team --  +++$+++ :Congrats and well done!  Another great addition to the team -- [[User:Samir_(The_Scope)|'''Samir''' <small>धर्म</small>]] 13:06, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

18427 +++$+++ New Age Retro Hippie +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-10 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.305083700E09 +++$+++ Good job on this article. If you could, though, could you opine over to the [[WT:VG\/RS]]? It's in pretty desperate need of some more opinions. -  +++$+++ Good job on this article. If you could, though, could you opine over to the [[WT:VG/RS]]? It's in pretty desperate need of some more opinions. - [[User:New Age Retro Hippie|The New Age Retro Hippie]] [[User talk:New Age Retro Hippie|used Ruler!]] [[Special:Contributions/New Age Retro Hippie|Now, he can figure out the length of things easily.]] 20:15, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
18428 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18427 +++$+++ 18427 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.305336420E09 +++$+++ VGChartz isn't considered a reliable source for Wikipedia because its information is unfounded and thus invalid.  +++$+++ :VGChartz isn't considered a reliable source for Wikipedia because its information is unfounded and thus invalid. [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 18:27, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
18429 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18427 +++$+++ 18427 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.305422700E09 +++$+++ Unless a more recent source that's actually reliable comes up, we will continue to use those figures.  +++$+++ :Unless a more recent source that's actually reliable comes up, we will continue to use those figures. [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 18:25, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
18430 +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ Cat's Tuxedo +++$+++ 18427 +++$+++ 18427 +++$+++ 2011-05-25 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.306384920E09 +++$+++ Crash Mania can't be proven as a reliable source, but I think Gamasutra is okay, so I'll look into that.  +++$+++ :Crash Mania can't be proven as a reliable source, but I think Gamasutra is okay, so I'll look into that. [[User:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo|Cat&#39;s Tuxedo]] ([[User talk:Cat&#39;s Tuxedo#top|talk]]) 21:42, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

280572 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-17 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.137560700E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but that doesn't fix it.  The problem is that the article title has no comma, and a comma is needed. Ordinarily one would move that article name, but in this case there is a redirect blocking the path.  +++$+++ Thanks, but that doesn't fix it.  The problem is that the article title has no comma, and a comma is needed. Ordinarily one would move that article name, but in this case there is a redirect blocking the path. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 21:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
280573 +++$+++ Konczewski +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 2006-01-18 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.137632400E09 +++$+++ So how does it get fixed?  I'm new to this.  Is there a specific moderator to contact? -- +++$+++ :So how does it get fixed?  I'm new to this.  Is there a specific moderator to contact? --[[User:Konczewski|Konczewski]] 17:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
280574 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 2006-01-18 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.137643020E09 +++$+++ Ordinarily, to preserve edit histories, an admin would have been required to delete the redirect and then move the page.  However, since there was only one edit on the page beyond its creation, I decided to move the text over wholesale, and \"just do it\".  I also created a page for the third book, and made a couple of tweakes.  +++$+++ :Ordinarily, to preserve edit histories, an admin would have been required to delete the redirect and then move the page.  However, since there was only one edit on the page beyond its creation, I decided to move the text over wholesale, and "just do it".  I also created a page for the third book, and made a couple of tweakes. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 19:57, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
280575 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 2006-01-23 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.138003440E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your work reverting vandals.  However, please do not use the popups edit reverter mechanism.  The edit summaries it uses are basically useless because the codenumber it leaves does not correspond to any particular edit that is easily identifiable and unlike the summaries that refer to the user contributions and talk pages, it leaves no trace of the user at fault.  All the same, thanks for your work.   +++$+++ :Thank you for your work reverting vandals.  However, please do not use the popups edit reverter mechanism.  The edit summaries it uses are basically useless because the codenumber it leaves does not correspond to any particular edit that is easily identifiable and unlike the summaries that refer to the user contributions and talk pages, it leaves no trace of the user at fault.  All the same, thanks for your work.  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 00:04, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
280576 +++$+++ This user has left wikipedia +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 2006-01-23 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.138003800E09 +++$+++ Popus -revision to XXXXX       ~  +++$+++ * Popus -revision to XXXXX       ~ [[User:This user has left wikipedia|This user has left wikipedia]] 00:10, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
280577 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 2006-01-23 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.138003980E09 +++$+++ I am not an admin and yet I manage to put informative reversion messages that point to the user's contributions and talk page.  I should probably try talking to the person who runs the popup thingy.   +++$+++ :I am not an admin and yet I manage to put informative reversion messages that point to the user's contributions and talk page.  I should probably try talking to the person who runs the popup thingy.  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 00:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
280578 +++$+++ This user has left wikipedia +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 2006-01-23 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.138004460E09 +++$+++ It's a problem when trying to revert several vandals, takes much more time to add the aprop. links. If someone really wanted to know what's going on they could do a compare and see what was reverted, if you know JS you can modify popups yourself... I think I might do that and have it just say rv by ip below or something like that.  +++$+++ :It's a problem when trying to revert several vandals, takes much more time to add the aprop. links. If someone really wanted to know what's going on they could do a compare and see what was reverted, if you know JS you can modify popups yourself... I think I might do that and have it just say rv by ip below or something like that. [[User:This user has left wikipedia|This user has left wikipedia]] 00:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
280579 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 2006-01-23 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.138004760E09 +++$+++ The great thing about the links to user contributions and talk pages is that they appear directly in Watch lists and other lists of edit summaries and it saves a great deal of time for fellow editors, which is why I do it.  I put some text in a file so that I paste in the user ID or IP address three times and it is done. <nowiki><nowiki>Revert [[Special:Contributions\/|]] ([[User Talk:|talk]]) vandal<\/nowiki><\/nowiki>   +++$+++ :The great thing about the links to user contributions and talk pages is that they appear directly in Watch lists and other lists of edit summaries and it saves a great deal of time for fellow editors, which is why I do it.  I put some text in a file so that I paste in the user ID or IP address three times and it is done. <nowiki><nowiki>Revert [[Special:Contributions/|]] ([[User Talk:|talk]]) vandal</nowiki></nowiki>  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 00:26, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
280580 +++$+++ This user has left wikipedia +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 2006-01-23 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.138005240E09 +++$+++ You should consider using Popups, it does does that automatically =D, just hover your mouse over the \"ip\", it has lots of features.  +++$+++ :You should consider using Popups, it does does that automatically =D, just hover your mouse over the "ip", it has lots of features. [[User:This user has left wikipedia|This user has left wikipedia]] 00:34, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
280581 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 2006-01-23 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.138005420E09 +++$+++ If it does it automatically, then why don't you use it and achieve the effect that we both want?  +++$+++ :If it does it automatically, then why don't you use it and achieve the effect that we both want? [[User:Hu|Hu]] 00:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
280582 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 280572 +++$+++ 2006-01-25 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.138176540E09 +++$+++ Please exercise more care with your edits.  You accidentally clobbered my [[Robert A. Heinlein]] link disambiguation edit on [[Micronation]] and I had to re-instate it.  +++$+++ :Please exercise more care with your edits.  You accidentally clobbered my [[Robert A. Heinlein]] link disambiguation edit on [[Micronation]] and I had to re-instate it. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 00:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

542723 +++$+++ Lucasbfr +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-24 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.166972820E09 +++$+++ Hi. First of all I wanted to state I am not involved in the article in any way, it just happened to have popped up in the RC feed. I was going to remove the db notice but you deleted the page faster than me ;). I am a bit puzzled by the fact of removing a redirection to be honest :), and well I learned in school that pact was called [[German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact]] so it can be understandable some people learned the name the other way. Well it was just my 2 cents at this late hour. good night! --  +++$+++ Hi. First of all I wanted to state I am not involved in the article in any way, it just happened to have popped up in the RC feed. I was going to remove the db notice but you deleted the page faster than me ;). I am a bit puzzled by the fact of removing a redirection to be honest :), and well I learned in school that pact was called [[German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact]] so it can be understandable some people learned the name the other way. Well it was just my 2 cents at this late hour. good night! -- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 07:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
542724 +++$+++ Lucasbfr +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542723 +++$+++ 542723 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.166973060E09 +++$+++ and I really shouldn't write anything in english at this late hour... This message was proudly sponsored by the comity for the usage of the word \"well\" --  +++$+++ :and I really shouldn't write anything in english at this late hour... This message was proudly sponsored by the comity for the usage of the word "well" -- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 07:11, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

542725 +++$+++ 69.156.77.245 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542725 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-24 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.167032400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:69.156.77.245|69.156.77.245]] 23:40, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
542726 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542725 +++$+++ 542725 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.167032520E09 +++$+++ Thanks...I think? +++$+++ :Thanks...I think?[[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>'']]-[[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|'''''<font color="Black">Bacon'''''</font>]] 23:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
542727 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542725 +++$+++ 542725 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.167032760E09 +++$+++ Taken care of.  +++$+++ :Taken care of. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>'']]-[[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|'''''<font color="Black">Bacon'''''</font>]] 23:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

280583 +++$+++ Gene Poole +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-25 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.138177920E09 +++$+++ Hi. I've no idea what you're talking about. There's no record of my making any edits to the the section of the article you're referring to. Am I missing something? -- +++$+++ Hi. I've no idea what you're talking about. There's no record of my making any edits to the the section of the article you're referring to. Am I missing something? --[[User:Gene Poole|Gene_poole]] 00:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
280584 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280583 +++$+++ 280583 +++$+++ 2006-01-25 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.138178220E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Micronation&diff=next&oldid=36558995 This edit] of yours.  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Micronation&diff=next&oldid=36558995 This edit] of yours. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 00:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
280585 +++$+++ Gene Poole +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280583 +++$+++ 280584 +++$+++ 2006-01-25 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.138178460E09 +++$+++ That's bizarre. I must have been editing an older version of the page at the time, because I certainly didn't deliberately remove the \"A.\" from Robert A. Heinlein. My apologies. -- +++$+++ ::That's bizarre. I must have been editing an older version of the page at the time, because I certainly didn't deliberately remove the "A." from Robert A. Heinlein. My apologies. --[[User:Gene Poole|Gene_poole]] 00:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
280586 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280583 +++$+++ 280584 +++$+++ 2006-01-25 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.138178580E09 +++$+++ Understood.  I thought it was an accident.  Onward and forward.  +++$+++ ::Understood.  I thought it was an accident.  Onward and forward. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 00:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
280587 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280583 +++$+++ 280583 +++$+++ 2006-01-25 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.138229640E09 +++$+++ You are most welcome.  I was astonished myself that it wasn't available, so I gave it the full treatment, so to speak.  +++$+++ :You are most welcome.  I was astonished myself that it wasn't available, so I gave it the full treatment, so to speak. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 14:54, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
280588 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280583 +++$+++ 280583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Please don't spam. Given that you have spammed now, if you really think that your manual is academic, then post a note on relevant article talk pages with the link directly to the manual, not to the whole blog site, and ask for reaction. At this point if you post any kind of link directly to the pages, you may get reverted reflexively. Hu 14:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :Please don't spam. Given that you have spammed now, if you really think that your manual is academic, then post a note on relevant article talk pages with the link directly to the manual, not to the whole blog site, and ask for reaction. At this point if you post any kind of link directly to the pages, you may get reverted reflexively. Hu 14:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

542730 +++$+++ Agathoclea +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-25 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.167078840E09 +++$+++ |style=\"background-color: #FFFFCC; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #777;\"|Hello, and thank you for the support on my recent [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Agathoclea|RfA]] despite your concerns. The final tally was '''63\/3\/2''', and I have now been entrusted with the [[Wikipedia:Administrators|mop]]. I hope I can live up to your trust, and certainly welcome any and all [[User talk:Agathoclea|feedback]].  All the best, and thanks again! &mdash;  +++$+++ |style="background-color: #FFFFCC; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #777;"|Hello, and thank you for the support on my recent [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Agathoclea|RfA]] despite your concerns. The final tally was '''63/3/2''', and I have now been entrusted with the [[Wikipedia:Administrators|mop]]. I hope I can live up to your trust, and certainly welcome any and all [[User talk:Agathoclea|feedback]].  All the best, and thanks again! &mdash; [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] 12:34, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
542731 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542730 +++$+++ 542730 +++$+++ 2006-12-26 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.167120540E09 +++$+++ At Wikipedia we strive to maintain a neutral point of view. This means that we strive to give every article a neutral tone and remain non-judgemental. In this case, I'm fairly certain that there are many people wouldn't label the PKK as a terrorist organization, so we use a more neutral sounding term such as Armed-Militant group. Also, personal attacks are not cool. Stop.  +++$+++ :At Wikipedia we strive to maintain a neutral point of view. This means that we strive to give every article a neutral tone and remain non-judgemental. In this case, I'm fairly certain that there are many people wouldn't label the PKK as a terrorist organization, so we use a more neutral sounding term such as Armed-Militant group. Also, personal attacks are not cool. Stop. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>'']]-[[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|'''''<font color="Black">Bacon'''''</font>]] 00:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

18444 +++$+++ Axl +++$+++ Tad Lincoln +++$+++ 18444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-29 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.285779180E09 +++$+++ I have posted a GA reassessment at [[Talk:Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China]]. Please feel free to comment.  +++$+++ I have posted a GA reassessment at [[Talk:Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China]]. Please feel free to comment. [[User:Axl|<font color="#808000">'''Axl'''</font>]] <font color="#3CB371">¤</font> <small>[[User talk:Axl|<font color="#808000">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 09:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
18445 +++$+++ Axl +++$+++ Tad Lincoln +++$+++ 18444 +++$+++ 18444 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.286294400E09 +++$+++ Please comment [[Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment#Organ_transplantation_in_the_People.27s_Republic_of_China|here]].  +++$+++ : Please comment [[Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment#Organ_transplantation_in_the_People.27s_Republic_of_China|here]]. [[User:Axl|<font color="#808000">'''Axl'''</font>]] <font color="#3CB371">¤</font> <small>[[User talk:Axl|<font color="#808000">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 09:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

527362 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527362 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-16 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.147846980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 23:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
527363 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527362 +++$+++ 527362 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.147847280E09 +++$+++ If this fails we'll just use [[User:Antidemon|Antidemon]].  +++$+++ :If this fails we'll just use [[User:Antidemon|Antidemon]]. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 23:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
527364 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527362 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.147847580E09 +++$+++ Well the crash may have been unrelated, so repeat steps 2-6 until there is no crash. But I'll go ahead approve [[User:Antidemon|Antidemon]].  +++$+++ ::::Well the crash may have been unrelated, so repeat steps 2-6 until there is no crash. But I'll go ahead approve [[User:Antidemon|Antidemon]]. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 23:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
527365 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527362 +++$+++ 527363 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.147847940E09 +++$+++ Yes, it should be fixed in the next version. [[User:Eagle 101|Eagle 101]] might come and make sure I didn't miss anything, but for now Antidemon is approved, so good luck vandal fighting!  +++$+++ ::Yes, it should be fixed in the next version. [[User:Eagle 101|Eagle 101]] might come and make sure I didn't miss anything, but for now Antidemon is approved, so good luck vandal fighting! [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 23:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

18446 +++$+++ Worm That Turned +++$+++ Tad Lincoln +++$+++ 18446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-18 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.290109140E09 +++$+++ Hi! I see you tagged [[C\xe9sar Ch\xe1vez]] as contradictory a couple of months ago in the immigration section. I've read it a couple of times, and I can't see what's contradictory. I've removed the tag, but if the contradicton is still there, please put it back, and put a note on the talk page. Cheers!  +++$+++ Hi! I see you tagged [[César Chávez]] as contradictory a couple of months ago in the immigration section. I've read it a couple of times, and I can't see what's contradictory. I've removed the tag, but if the contradicton is still there, please put it back, and put a note on the talk page. Cheers! [[User Talk:Worm That Turned|<span style="text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;"><font color="black">'''''Worm'''''</font></span>]] 11:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
18447 +++$+++ Worm That Turned +++$+++ Tad Lincoln +++$+++ 18446 +++$+++ 18446 +++$+++ 2010-11-18 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.290109920E09 +++$+++ Similarly for [[Sole Survivor Policy]], not exactly sure what's contradictory there. Cheers  +++$+++ :Similarly for [[Sole Survivor Policy]], not exactly sure what's contradictory there. Cheers [[User Talk:Worm That Turned|<span style="text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;"><font color="black">'''''Worm'''''</font></span>]] 11:52, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

542736 +++$+++ Crzrussian +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-28 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.167365940E09 +++$+++ I nicked from Lar myself... :) - <b> +++$+++ I nicked from Lar myself... :) - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|crz]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|crztalk]]</small> 20:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
542737 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542736 +++$+++ 542736 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.167394920E09 +++$+++ The article you speak of had been recreated and deleted twice already before both times by different people, you can view it's AfD [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Dragon's Fury|Here]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ :The article you speak of had been recreated and deleted twice already before both times by different people, you can view it's AfD [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dragon's Fury|Here]]. Thanks. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>'']]-[[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|'''''<font color="Black">Bacon'''''</font>]] 04:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

280593 +++$+++ pschemp +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-26 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.138311780E09 +++$+++ Um - the same thing happened to me on this page...I didn't get an edit conflict warning either on this page.  As such I feel like you might fix your comment to my talk page.  +++$+++ Um - the same thing happened to me on this page...I didn't get an edit conflict warning either on this page.  As such I feel like you might fix your comment to my talk page. [[User:Pschemp|Pschemp]] | [[User talk:Pschemp|Talk]] 13:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
280594 +++$+++ pschemp +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280593 +++$+++ 280593 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.138312140E09 +++$+++ Thanks! +++$+++ :Thanks![[User:Pschemp|Pschemp]] | [[User talk:Pschemp|Talk]] 13:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
280595 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280593 +++$+++ 280593 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.138312320E09 +++$+++ Yup, something funny going on with Wikipedia.  I replied on your talk page and accept your explanation that it was accidental.  Sorry for any disturbance.  Hope that all is well with Wikipedia soon.  +++$+++ :Yup, something funny going on with Wikipedia.  I replied on your talk page and accept your explanation that it was accidental.  Sorry for any disturbance.  Hope that all is well with Wikipedia soon. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 13:52, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

542738 +++$+++ Sean Jones1 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542738 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-29 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.167395580E09 +++$+++ So....uh...I guess I should start off by saying I'm sorry for vanadalizing the RfA page...and...I won't do it again. I only did it because I couldn't find anything else to do. So, d'you want to give me a hand? -- +++$+++ So....uh...I guess I should start off by saying I'm sorry for vanadalizing the RfA page...and...I won't do it again. I only did it because I couldn't find anything else to do. So, d'you want to give me a hand? --[[User:Sean Jones1|Sean Jones1]] 04:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
542739 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542738 +++$+++ 542738 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.167443820E09 +++$+++ We all hate having our work deleted, it sucks, I'll admit it and yet it's happened to all of us. Administrators are bound to certain processes, through which we have to delete articles. Specifically these processes are [[WP:CSD]], [[WP:PROD]] and [[WP:AFD]]. These processes, in turn are bound by several guidelines, notably [[WP:N]], [[WP:V]], [[WP:OR]], [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:NOT]]. Understandably, this mass of rules can be confusing to those who don't know the system. All I can really say, is sorry.  +++$+++ :We all hate having our work deleted, it sucks, I'll admit it and yet it's happened to all of us. Administrators are bound to certain processes, through which we have to delete articles. Specifically these processes are [[WP:CSD]], [[WP:PROD]] and [[WP:AFD]]. These processes, in turn are bound by several guidelines, notably [[WP:N]], [[WP:V]], [[WP:OR]], [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:NOT]]. Understandably, this mass of rules can be confusing to those who don't know the system. All I can really say, is sorry. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>'']]-[[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|'''''<font color="Black">Bacon'''''</font>]] 17:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

280598 +++$+++ Morwen +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280598 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-26 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.138316700E09 +++$+++ Well done for attempting to destroy my chaperoning of this user, both of you.  If you want to provoke them into becoming an enemy of Wikipedia you are going exactly the way about it.   +++$+++ Well done for attempting to destroy my chaperoning of this user, both of you.  If you want to provoke them into becoming an enemy of Wikipedia you are going exactly the way about it.  [[User:Morwen|Morwen]] - [[User_talk:Morwen|Talk]] 15:05, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
280599 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280598 +++$+++ 280598 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.138316940E09 +++$+++ Not trying to provoke.  After a personal attack it is proper to direct the new user to take notice of No Personal Attacks.  Blanking pages is not chaperoning.  Mollycoddling spammers and uncooperative users who know exactly what they are doing is not helpful.  +++$+++ :Not trying to provoke.  After a personal attack it is proper to direct the new user to take notice of No Personal Attacks.  Blanking pages is not chaperoning.  Mollycoddling spammers and uncooperative users who know exactly what they are doing is not helpful. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 15:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
280600 +++$+++ Morwen +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280598 +++$+++ 280599 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.138317300E09 +++$+++ He'd stopped.  Various random people were warning him against doing things he had ''already stopped''.  That was not helpful.  I had the matter in hand.  You should always be polite, even to rude people.   +++$+++ ::He'd stopped.  Various random people were warning him against doing things he had ''already stopped''.  That was not helpful.  I had the matter in hand.  You should always be polite, even to rude people.  [[User:Morwen|Morwen]] - [[User_talk:Morwen|Talk]] 15:15, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
280601 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280598 +++$+++ 280600 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.138317600E09 +++$+++ I was polite and so were others, and he had not stopped after being warned.  You did not have the matter in hand, because he continued after your warning ''and'' he blanked his talk page to remove your warning, which is why you made your statement to him \"If you respond with defiance I am going to block you.\".   +++$+++ :::I was polite and so were others, and he had not stopped after being warned.  You did not have the matter in hand, because he continued after your warning ''and'' he blanked his talk page to remove your warning, which is why you made your statement to him "If you respond with defiance I am going to block you.".  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 15:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
280602 +++$+++ pschemp +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280598 +++$+++ 280601 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.138317780E09 +++$+++ I only used approved templates.  If they are not considered polite, why have them? +++$+++ ::::I only used approved templates.  If they are not considered polite, why have them?[[User:Pschemp|Pschemp]] | [[User talk:Pschemp|Talk]] 15:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
280603 +++$+++ Morwen +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280598 +++$+++ 280602 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.138317840E09 +++$+++ He had stopped and then people warned him afterwards.  If you examine the timestamps you will discover this to be true.  As a new user, he cannot be expected to know that blanking talk pages is supposedly bad - something I dispute anyway - it's usually used as a arbritary bat to hit people with rather than a rational rule - plenty of regular editors seem to do it happily.  But fine, I've got better things to do than this.   +++$+++ :::::He had stopped and then people warned him afterwards.  If you examine the timestamps you will discover this to be true.  As a new user, he cannot be expected to know that blanking talk pages is supposedly bad - something I dispute anyway - it's usually used as a arbritary bat to hit people with rather than a rational rule - plenty of regular editors seem to do it happily.  But fine, I've got better things to do than this.  [[User:Morwen|Morwen]] - [[User_talk:Morwen|Talk]] 15:24, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
280604 +++$+++ Morwen +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280598 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.138318680E09 +++$+++ The last insertion of spam was dated at 12:42, which happened slightly after I warned him quite strongly to stop, and I can assume he didn't read the note until 12:43.  After this, he recieved [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Paper33d&diff=36783192&oldid=36783055 this warning] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Paper33d&diff=36783449&oldid=36783192 this warning] despite having not done any more spamming in the intervening time.   +++$+++ :::::::The last insertion of spam was dated at 12:42, which happened slightly after I warned him quite strongly to stop, and I can assume he didn't read the note until 12:43.  After this, he recieved [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paper33d&diff=36783192&oldid=36783055 this warning] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paper33d&diff=36783449&oldid=36783192 this warning] despite having not done any more spamming in the intervening time.  [[User:Morwen|Morwen]] - [[User_talk:Morwen|Talk]] 15:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
280605 +++$+++ pschemp +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280598 +++$+++ 280601 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.138319400E09 +++$+++ I'm overcome with preceding colons!  Anyway, yes, Morwen, You are correct about the spamming warnings, but there was something funky going on with the lack of edit conflict messages and I suspect that all the comments weren't displaying to everyone which may have contributed to the multiple spam warnings. (see above topic for this.) However, the blanking thing is a different issue.  I understand that by then we all were frustrated with this person and this was the cause of any pileon, rahter than a deliberate intent to undermine your wiki person cultivation.   +++$+++ ::::I'm overcome with preceding colons!  Anyway, yes, Morwen, You are correct about the spamming warnings, but there was something funky going on with the lack of edit conflict messages and I suspect that all the comments weren't displaying to everyone which may have contributed to the multiple spam warnings. (see above topic for this.) However, the blanking thing is a different issue.  I understand that by then we all were frustrated with this person and this was the cause of any pileon, rahter than a deliberate intent to undermine your wiki person cultivation.  [[User:Pschemp|Pschemp]] | [[User talk:Pschemp|Talk]] 15:50, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
280606 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280598 +++$+++ 280605 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.138318980E09 +++$+++ Paper33d was protesting Morwen's warnings (plural) and clearly not understanding the issue when I added my first note, which was explanatory and '''not''' a warning. The policy against blanking talk pages is rational.  As I explained on Paper33d's talk page, blanking makes it very difficult to read a discussion because it forces editors to reconstrust it by laboriously going through the page history and it whitewashes the issues.  +++$+++ :::::Paper33d was protesting Morwen's warnings (plural) and clearly not understanding the issue when I added my first note, which was explanatory and '''not''' a warning. The policy against blanking talk pages is rational.  As I explained on Paper33d's talk page, blanking makes it very difficult to read a discussion because it forces editors to reconstrust it by laboriously going through the page history and it whitewashes the issues. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 15:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

550544 +++$+++ Beland +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-10 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.123733760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for bringing the backlog to my attention.  Pearle is now grinding through the listings. --  +++$+++ Thanks for bringing the backlog to my attention.  Pearle is now grinding through the listings. -- [[User:Beland|Beland]] 21:16, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
550545 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550544 +++$+++ 550544 +++$+++ 2005-08-10 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.123733940E09 +++$+++ Great thanks! - +++$+++ :Great thanks! -[[User:Splash|Splash]] 21:19, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

583031 +++$+++ Extraordinary Machine +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 583031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-05 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.183681020E09 +++$+++ Well and truly deserved! To celebrate this occasion, I made something for you :)  +++$+++ Well and truly deserved! To celebrate this occasion, I made something for you :) [[User:Extraordinary Machine|Extraordinary Machine]] 17:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
583032 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 583031 +++$+++ 583031 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.183681500E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Funny image! :)  +++$+++ :Thanks! Funny image! :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

280609 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280609 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-29 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.138530000E09 +++$+++ I've created the new [[Robert A. Heinlein bibliography]] and placed your [[Template:Heinlein (Novel)]] template on that page.  I also moved the template in the main [[Robert A. Heinlein]] article up to the Bibliography section, where it serves a good purpose to summarize the list of Heinlein novels for quick reference.  I edited the template to make the name conform with the convention on Wikipedia that the name include the middle initial A.  Thanks for creating the template, and just in time too.  +++$+++ I've created the new [[Robert A. Heinlein bibliography]] and placed your [[Template:Heinlein (Novel)]] template on that page.  I also moved the template in the main [[Robert A. Heinlein]] article up to the Bibliography section, where it serves a good purpose to summarize the list of Heinlein novels for quick reference.  I edited the template to make the name conform with the convention on Wikipedia that the name include the middle initial A.  Thanks for creating the template, and just in time too. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 02:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
280610 +++$+++ Palm dogg +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280609 +++$+++ 280609 +++$+++ 2006-01-29 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.138550460E09 +++$+++ No problemo.  Double kudos on making the bibliography page.  The main Heinlein page had just gottten too unwieldy.  +++$+++ :No problemo.  Double kudos on making the bibliography page.  The main Heinlein page had just gottten too unwieldy. [[User:Palm dogg|Palm_Dogg]] 08:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

542755 +++$+++ Tonywalton +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542755 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-09 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.168404360E09 +++$+++ I think the prson who tagged that as a copyvio was a little over-enthusiastic. If you take a look at the page it's allegedly a copyvio from, that [http:\/\/www.lala.com\/frontend\/action\/artist\/As%20The%20Sun%20Sets page] actually ''cites'' Wikipedia as its source. I propose undeleting it, if that's OK by you?   +++$+++ I think the prson who tagged that as a copyvio was a little over-enthusiastic. If you take a look at the page it's allegedly a copyvio from, that [http://www.lala.com/frontend/action/artist/As%20The%20Sun%20Sets page] actually ''cites'' Wikipedia as its source. I propose undeleting it, if that's OK by you?  [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 20:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
542756 +++$+++ Tonywalton +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542755 +++$+++ 542755 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.168404960E09 +++$+++ I see what you mean. Odd though, the last version of As The Sun Sets was tagged as a copyvio from [http:\/\/www.myspace.com\/asthesunsetsgrind] <small>warning, plays music at you<\/small> but doesn't seem to be. Looks like someone copyvio'ed, then the page was moved to correct capitalisation, then the original page was recreated, then the original wrongly-capitalised page was cited elsewhere... Eurgh. My head hurts!   +++$+++ :I see what you mean. Odd though, the last version of As The Sun Sets was tagged as a copyvio from [http://www.myspace.com/asthesunsetsgrind] <small>warning, plays music at you</small> but doesn't seem to be. Looks like someone copyvio'ed, then the page was moved to correct capitalisation, then the original page was recreated, then the original wrongly-capitalised page was cited elsewhere... Eurgh. My head hurts!  [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 20:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
542757 +++$+++ Tonywalton +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542755 +++$+++ 542756 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.168405500E09 +++$+++ I think I'll recreate it and move to \"As The Sun Sets\". As for notability, I reckon ''As The Sun Sets' singer, bassist, and drummer moved on to form the successful grind band [[Daughters (band)|Daughters]]'' fulfils the bit of [[WP:BAND]] that says ''Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable''. Cheers.  +++$+++ ::I think I'll recreate it and move to "As The Sun Sets". As for notability, I reckon ''As The Sun Sets' singer, bassist, and drummer moved on to form the successful grind band [[Daughters (band)|Daughters]]'' fulfils the bit of [[WP:BAND]] that says ''Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable''. Cheers. [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 21:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

566830 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ KFP +++$+++ 566830 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-09 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.191920520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions! <span style=\"background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;\"> +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions! <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span> 02:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
566831 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ KFP +++$+++ 566830 +++$+++ 566830 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.191920520E09 +++$+++ Good work, KFP! <span style=\"background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;\"> +++$+++ :Good work, KFP! <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span> 02:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

527366 +++$+++ Eagle 101 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-17 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.147911420E09 +++$+++ Please clarify, are you logging into wikipedia as [[user:^demon]] or as %5Edemon?? You should be logging in as ^demon( on the wiki). For VP, you should be logging in as %5Edemon. (let me know if this works, leave me a note on my page that you responded here, thanks) I have another idea, but lets do easy stuff first +++$+++ Please clarify, are you logging into wikipedia as [[user:^demon]] or as %5Edemon?? You should be logging in as ^demon( on the wiki). For VP, you should be logging in as %5Edemon. (let me know if this works, leave me a note on my page that you responded here, thanks) I have another idea, but lets do easy stuff first[[user:Eagle 101|Eagle]]  [[user_talk:Eagle 101|talk]] 17:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
527367 +++$+++ Eagle 101 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527366 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.147925280E09 +++$+++ That sounds good, if it does not work, I have a second request. (depending on your response, I may be able to get you up and working). Good luck. (as before, let me know that you responded on my talkpage, thanks.) +++$+++ ::That sounds good, if it does not work, I have a second request. (depending on your response, I may be able to get you up and working). Good luck. (as before, let me know that you responded on my talkpage, thanks.)[[user:Eagle 101|Eagle]]  [[user_talk:Eagle 101|talk]] 21:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

542763 +++$+++ Yuser31415 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-10 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.168496940E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3A202.69.57.8&diff=99859757&oldid=99858832] - is this deliberate or not? '' +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A202.69.57.8&diff=99859757&oldid=99858832] - is this deliberate or not? ''[[User:Yuser31415|Yuser31415]]'' 22:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
542764 +++$+++ Yuser31415 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542763 +++$+++ 542763 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.168497120E09 +++$+++ Cheers, it was just a minor glitch, but I thought I'd let you know. Thanks! '' +++$+++ : Cheers, it was just a minor glitch, but I thought I'd let you know. Thanks! ''[[User:Yuser31415|Yuser31415]]'' 22:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

308914 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-02 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.228269540E09 +++$+++ The law in Britain is that media coverage after somebody has been charged cannot contain information likely to prejudice a fair trial. This covers both editorials and factual coverage, so in the [[Peter Tobin]] case the British media couldn't mention his previous convictions in the reports before he was convicted, since they were not presented as evidence in court.  +++$+++ The law in Britain is that media coverage after somebody has been charged cannot contain information likely to prejudice a fair trial. This covers both editorials and factual coverage, so in the [[Peter Tobin]] case the British media couldn't mention his previous convictions in the reports before he was convicted, since they were not presented as evidence in court. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 17:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
308915 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308914 +++$+++ 308914 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.228271460E09 +++$+++ Yes, it was mentioned on the news that the jurors did not know of his previous convictions. That's what I was thinking about, does it mean that on official request we should edit such articles to remove all mention of previous convictions, and full or semi protect the articles. There were anomalies, in that the BBC did not remove [[Angelika Kluk]] articles from its website, and we made no alterations to our article so the information remained available on WP. If anything, deleting the Tobin page made it more likely that the Kluk case would show up on a search. In principle I think your proposal of extra care over BLP standards is right, so this issue boils down to whether WP is legally regarded as media coverage, and whether it applies to old pages equivalent to the BBC archive coverage. By the way, our [[sub judice]] page makes no mention of Scotland, and no guidance showed up on a bit of searching but this case indicates that it does apply. .  +++$+++ :Yes, it was mentioned on the news that the jurors did not know of his previous convictions. That's what I was thinking about, does it mean that on official request we should edit such articles to remove all mention of previous convictions, and full or semi protect the articles. There were anomalies, in that the BBC did not remove [[Angelika Kluk]] articles from its website, and we made no alterations to our article so the information remained available on WP. If anything, deleting the Tobin page made it more likely that the Kluk case would show up on a search. In principle I think your proposal of extra care over BLP standards is right, so this issue boils down to whether WP is legally regarded as media coverage, and whether it applies to old pages equivalent to the BBC archive coverage. By the way, our [[sub judice]] page makes no mention of Scotland, and no guidance showed up on a bit of searching but this case indicates that it does apply. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

280623 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280623 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-05 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.139166540E09 +++$+++ Only peripherally.  The Pokemon categories are more specialized, so that they are the appropriate categories for the monsters.  People who want to see Pokemons will go to the Pokemon categories.  However, for other people, the Pokemons just clutter up the fictional animal categories.  +++$+++ Only peripherally.  The Pokemon categories are more specialized, so that they are the appropriate categories for the monsters.  People who want to see Pokemons will go to the Pokemon categories.  However, for other people, the Pokemons just clutter up the fictional animal categories. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 11:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
280624 +++$+++ Sparky the Seventh Chaos +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280623 +++$+++ 280623 +++$+++ 2006-02-06 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.139237220E09 +++$+++ (And just for reference, the plural of 'Pok\xe9mon' is 'Pok\xe9mon', like 'sheep' and 'sheep'. ;) ) -- +++$+++ :(And just for reference, the plural of 'Pokémon' is 'Pokémon', like 'sheep' and 'sheep'. ;) ) --[[User:Sparky the Seventh Chaos|Sparky Lurkdragon]] 06:47, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
280625 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280623 +++$+++ 280623 +++$+++ 2006-02-06 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.139242080E09 +++$+++ Does this mean that Sparky Lurkdragon is a sockpuppet for Andros 1337 and vice versa since you say \"note what I did above\"?  +++$+++ :Does this mean that Sparky Lurkdragon is a sockpuppet for Andros 1337 and vice versa since you say "note what I did above"? [[User:Hu|Hu]] 08:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
280626 +++$+++ Sparky the Seventh Chaos +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280623 +++$+++ 280625 +++$+++ 2006-02-06 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.139264640E09 +++$+++ Um... no.  I was referring to the fact that I had written more than one paragraph. -- +++$+++ ::Um... no.  I was referring to the fact that I had written more than one paragraph. --[[User:Sparky the Seventh Chaos|Sparky Lurkdragon]] 14:24, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
280627 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280623 +++$+++ 280625 +++$+++ 2006-02-06 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.139283840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification.  I was confused.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the clarification.  I was confused. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 19:44, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

542769 +++$+++ Aleta +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-19 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.169275080E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure the best place to report this, but I saw on [[User talk:Yankee412]] that you had given a last warning about vandalism.  I've just posted another vandalism warning there. (BTW, where should I really be posting this?)  +++$+++ I'm not sure the best place to report this, but I saw on [[User talk:Yankee412]] that you had given a last warning about vandalism.  I've just posted another vandalism warning there. (BTW, where should I really be posting this?) [[User:Aleta|Aleta]] 22:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
542770 +++$+++ Aleta +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542769 +++$+++ 542769 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.169279880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for replying, taking action, and letting me know about the right place for reporting such vandalism.  Much appreciated!  +++$+++ :Thanks for replying, taking action, and letting me know about the right place for reporting such vandalism.  Much appreciated! [[User:Aleta|Aleta]] 23:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

18484 +++$+++ Umi1903 +++$+++ Gokhantig +++$+++ 18484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-03 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.202097900E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Umi1903|Umi1903]] ([[User talk:Umi1903|talk]]) 20:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
18485 +++$+++ Umi1903 +++$+++ Gokhantig +++$+++ 18484 +++$+++ 18484 +++$+++ 2008-02-03 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.202104800E09 +++$+++ Tekrar tesekkurler...-- +++$+++ :Tekrar tesekkurler...--[[User:Umi1903|Umi1903]] ([[User talk:Umi1903|talk]]) 22:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
18486 +++$+++ Gokhantig +++$+++ Gokhantig +++$+++ 18484 +++$+++ 18485 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.202277900E09 +++$+++ Ben Fenerbah\xe7eliyim ancak gerek T\xfcrk futbolu, gerekse T\xfcrkiye hakkinda mumkun oldugunca cok sayfa, dogru sayfa olusturmak istiyorum Wikipedia'da. O yuzden diger takimlarinin sayfalarina saldirmaktan ziyade onlara birseyler eklemek istiyorum. Ornegin tum cumartesi gunumu Bursaspor sayfasi ile gecirdim diyebilirim. Ayni sekilde birbirimizin yaptiklarina saldirmalar yerine eklemeler ile daha iyi seyler yapacagimiza inaniyorum. <p> Sayfalarinda basarilar ve kolay gelsin..  +++$+++ ::Ben Fenerbahçeliyim ancak gerek Türk futbolu, gerekse Türkiye hakkinda mumkun oldugunca cok sayfa, dogru sayfa olusturmak istiyorum Wikipedia'da. O yuzden diger takimlarinin sayfalarina saldirmaktan ziyade onlara birseyler eklemek istiyorum. Ornegin tum cumartesi gunumu Bursaspor sayfasi ile gecirdim diyebilirim. Ayni sekilde birbirimizin yaptiklarina saldirmalar yerine eklemeler ile daha iyi seyler yapacagimiza inaniyorum. <p> Sayfalarinda basarilar ve kolay gelsin.. [[User:Gokhantig|Gokhan Tig]] ([[User talk:Gokhantig|talk]]) 22:05, 05 February 2008 (UTC)
18487 +++$+++ Umi1903 +++$+++ Gokhantig +++$+++ 18484 +++$+++ 18486 +++$+++ 2008-02-06 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.202340900E09 +++$+++ Tekrar merhaba, cok uzun yazamayacagim maalesef; milli maca gidiyorum da! Olabildigince futbolcu fotosu cekmeye calisacagim. Istanbul Pazar Ligi uzerine nereden kaynak buldugunuzu merak ettim de. Bazi sitelerde (Turkfutbolu.net gibi) bu ligin sadece iki sezon oynandigina dair kayitlar var ve neye guvenmem gerektigini bilmiyorum acikcasi. Tesekkurler -- +++$+++ :::Tekrar merhaba, cok uzun yazamayacagim maalesef; milli maca gidiyorum da! Olabildigince futbolcu fotosu cekmeye calisacagim. Istanbul Pazar Ligi uzerine nereden kaynak buldugunuzu merak ettim de. Bazi sitelerde (Turkfutbolu.net gibi) bu ligin sadece iki sezon oynandigina dair kayitlar var ve neye guvenmem gerektigini bilmiyorum acikcasi. Tesekkurler --[[User:Umi1903|Umi1903]] ([[User talk:Umi1903|talk]]) 15:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

280633 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280633 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-17 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.140233220E09 +++$+++ Surely the proper order for this would be to get the page deleted first and '''then''' delete the links.  It would save a lot of bother for everybody to do it in that order.  Who knows if the page will actually be deleted.  If it is a slam-dunk, then it should be deleted already.  But it isn't.  If you can't speedy delete the page, then don't speedy delete the links.   +++$+++ Surely the proper order for this would be to get the page deleted first and '''then''' delete the links.  It would save a lot of bother for everybody to do it in that order.  Who knows if the page will actually be deleted.  If it is a slam-dunk, then it should be deleted already.  But it isn't.  If you can't speedy delete the page, then don't speedy delete the links.  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 19:27, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
280634 +++$+++ Michael Snow +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280633 +++$+++ 280633 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.140233400E09 +++$+++ It's not a speedy deletion, the page has been listed as a copyright problem for weeks. The page ''will'' be deleted. But the typical order is to remove the links first, then delete the page, because it's easier to find the links while the page still exists. -- +++$+++ :It's not a speedy deletion, the page has been listed as a copyright problem for weeks. The page ''will'' be deleted. But the typical order is to remove the links first, then delete the page, because it's easier to find the links while the page still exists. --[[User:Michael Snow|Michael Snow]] 19:30, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
280635 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280633 +++$+++ 280633 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.140234000E09 +++$+++ Exactly, it is not a speedy deletion, so don't speedy delete the links; there is a more thoughtful way (read on).  If there were zero doubt, then it would be posted, but since this has apparently been going on for weeks, then it is not decided that the page will be deleted, or it would have been deleted long ago.  Once the decision has been made, i.e. some number of minutes before the page is deleted, and after a notice is posted on the talk page explaining, then by all means use the page to find the links, as you say, but do it properly, not like it has been done.  A very important thing is that non-copyrighted information would be erased from Wikipedia by doing this improperly the way it is being done.  If it were done properly, then you would make a note on each guitarists page about the ranking in the list.  Each individual ranking is not copyrighted, though the list may be.  Furthermore, whether or not the list should be deleted, the page should NOT be deleted because there is non-copyrighted discussion of the list and the controversies surrounding it.   +++$+++ :Exactly, it is not a speedy deletion, so don't speedy delete the links; there is a more thoughtful way (read on).  If there were zero doubt, then it would be posted, but since this has apparently been going on for weeks, then it is not decided that the page will be deleted, or it would have been deleted long ago.  Once the decision has been made, i.e. some number of minutes before the page is deleted, and after a notice is posted on the talk page explaining, then by all means use the page to find the links, as you say, but do it properly, not like it has been done.  A very important thing is that non-copyrighted information would be erased from Wikipedia by doing this improperly the way it is being done.  If it were done properly, then you would make a note on each guitarists page about the ranking in the list.  Each individual ranking is not copyrighted, though the list may be.  Furthermore, whether or not the list should be deleted, the page should NOT be deleted because there is non-copyrighted discussion of the list and the controversies surrounding it.  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 19:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
280636 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280633 +++$+++ 280633 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.140234300E09 +++$+++ Actually, I was thinking of the Rolling Stone 500 greatest album page that has a lot of discussion, but the principle is the same.  +++$+++ :Actually, I was thinking of the Rolling Stone 500 greatest album page that has a lot of discussion, but the principle is the same. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 19:45, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
280637 +++$+++ Michael Snow +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280633 +++$+++ 280636 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.140235380E09 +++$+++ In announcing this deletion on [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems\/2006 February 4]], I already gave time for people to mention the ranking in the articles of individual guitarists. Very few people have bothered to state the actual ranking, mostly the link is just dropped into a \"See also\" section. If the ranking is stated, I leave that text in place, but I'm not going to do the work of adding it in to every single article. The list is still available from ''Rolling Stone'', so anybody who wants to list the actual ranking can still do so after this list is deleted. -- +++$+++ ::In announcing this deletion on [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2006 February 4]], I already gave time for people to mention the ranking in the articles of individual guitarists. Very few people have bothered to state the actual ranking, mostly the link is just dropped into a "See also" section. If the ranking is stated, I leave that text in place, but I'm not going to do the work of adding it in to every single article. The list is still available from ''Rolling Stone'', so anybody who wants to list the actual ranking can still do so after this list is deleted. --[[User:Michael Snow|Michael Snow]] 20:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

18492 +++$+++ Dweller +++$+++ Gokhantig +++$+++ 18492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-26 12:06:00 +++$+++ 1.206558360E09 +++$+++ Hi. I see you're quite new round here. Please don't recreate material that's been properly deleted through a deletion process, as with [[:Template:Turkey Squad 2003 Confederations Cup]]. I've speedy deleted it according to our policies on recreation of deleted material and then needed to spend quite a lot of my time removing all the links you added to this template. If you disagree with the result of a deletion debate, the correct thing to do is to open a [[WP:DRV]]. Recreating the material can be regarded as being disruptive, but given that you're new round here (and may not even have realised you were recreating something that had been deleted) I'm happy to give you the benefit of the doubt. Cheers. -- +++$+++ Hi. I see you're quite new round here. Please don't recreate material that's been properly deleted through a deletion process, as with [[:Template:Turkey Squad 2003 Confederations Cup]]. I've speedy deleted it according to our policies on recreation of deleted material and then needed to spend quite a lot of my time removing all the links you added to this template. If you disagree with the result of a deletion debate, the correct thing to do is to open a [[WP:DRV]]. Recreating the material can be regarded as being disruptive, but given that you're new round here (and may not even have realised you were recreating something that had been deleted) I'm happy to give you the benefit of the doubt. Cheers. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 12:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
18493 +++$+++ Dweller +++$+++ Gokhantig +++$+++ 18492 +++$+++ 18492 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.206558480E09 +++$+++ NB The relevant TfD can be seen at [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion\/Log\/2006 November 17]]. -- +++$+++ :NB The relevant TfD can be seen at [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 November 17]]. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 12:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

614752 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614752 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-15 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.147742640E09 +++$+++ On the [[Best Buy]] article, a contributer new to Wikipedia has made some edits which do not conform to policy.  The user felt that the article was POV, so added POV to balance it, instead of correcting the article to make it NPOV.  In addition, the user's contributions are original and not verifiable.  I tried explaining the problem to them and pointed out specific Wikipedia policies, but they feel that they are truely balancing the article.  I'm going to try to explain the problem to the user once more.  However, I do feel the user is making a good-faith effort, so rather than keep reverting (which would start a revert war) or being bossy to the user, what method should I take to resolve the issue?  +++$+++ On the [[Best Buy]] article, a contributer new to Wikipedia has made some edits which do not conform to policy.  The user felt that the article was POV, so added POV to balance it, instead of correcting the article to make it NPOV.  In addition, the user's contributions are original and not verifiable.  I tried explaining the problem to them and pointed out specific Wikipedia policies, but they feel that they are truely balancing the article.  I'm going to try to explain the problem to the user once more.  However, I do feel the user is making a good-faith effort, so rather than keep reverting (which would start a revert war) or being bossy to the user, what method should I take to resolve the issue? [[User:Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]] 18:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
614753 +++$+++ Computerjoe +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614752 +++$+++ 614752 +++$+++ 2006-05-15 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.147743120E09 +++$+++ Come to a compromise?  +++$+++ :Come to a compromise? [[User:Computerjoe|Computerjoe]][[User talk:Computerjoe|<span style="color:red">'s talk</span>]] 18:32, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
614754 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614752 +++$+++ 614753 +++$+++ 2006-05-15 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.147743360E09 +++$+++ That's why I am going to try to do next however you can't really comprimise when it comes to original research and unsourced comments. But I meant after that if it doesn't work.  The problem is that I've never dealt with good-faith POV editing, so I'm not sure what would be the polite way to resolve the dispute if a comprimise can't be reached.  +++$+++ ::That's why I am going to try to do next however you can't really comprimise when it comes to original research and unsourced comments. But I meant after that if it doesn't work.  The problem is that I've never dealt with good-faith POV editing, so I'm not sure what would be the polite way to resolve the dispute if a comprimise can't be reached. [[User:Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]] 18:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
614755 +++$+++ Computerjoe +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614752 +++$+++ 614754 +++$+++ 2006-05-15 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.147743480E09 +++$+++ Post a message on the related talk page, gain others opinion. Also, please don't subst {{tl|helpme}}  +++$+++ :::Post a message on the related talk page, gain others opinion. Also, please don't subst {{tl|helpme}} [[User:Computerjoe|Computerjoe]][[User talk:Computerjoe|<span style="color:red">'s talk</span>]] 18:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
614756 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614752 +++$+++ 614755 +++$+++ 2006-05-15 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.147743960E09 +++$+++ That's what I have been doing, but no one else has commented.  Is there a tag I can put on the page to flag it as needing comment?  Hopefully my last reply the user will be able to agree with.  As for subst'ing helpme, sorry, I was recently asked by another user to subst templates because I wasn't subst'ing any.  +++$+++ ::::That's what I have been doing, but no one else has commented.  Is there a tag I can put on the page to flag it as needing comment?  Hopefully my last reply the user will be able to agree with.  As for subst'ing helpme, sorry, I was recently asked by another user to subst templates because I wasn't subst'ing any. [[User:Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]] 18:46, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

527371 +++$+++ Mangojuice +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-17 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.147905000E09 +++$+++ I have removed the {{tl|prod}} tag from [[Big Dog Eat Child]], which you proposed for deletion.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  I have nominated the article for deletion instead; the debate may be found at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Big Dog Eat Child]], which overrides the need for a {{tl|prod}} tag.  I have explained my reasons for doing this in my nomination.  Thanks!  +++$+++ I have removed the {{tl|prod}} tag from [[Big Dog Eat Child]], which you proposed for deletion.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  I have nominated the article for deletion instead; the debate may be found at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Dog Eat Child]], which overrides the need for a {{tl|prod}} tag.  I have explained my reasons for doing this in my nomination.  Thanks! [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 15:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
527372 +++$+++ Mangojuice +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527371 +++$+++ 527371 +++$+++ 2006-05-17 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.147922760E09 +++$+++ Oh, I forgot to mention this earlier, but I think you did <nowiki>{{subst:dated prod}}<\/nowiki> when you tagged this article.  It's better to use <nowiki>{{subst:prod}}<\/nowiki> instead, which creates an unsubsted dated prod, because this is easy to identify and remove if someone objects; when substed, it's not as clear where the dated prod ends.  Also, using subst:prod fills in the date for you.  :)   +++$+++ :Oh, I forgot to mention this earlier, but I think you did <nowiki>{{subst:dated prod}}</nowiki> when you tagged this article.  It's better to use <nowiki>{{subst:prod}}</nowiki> instead, which creates an unsubsted dated prod, because this is easy to identify and remove if someone objects; when substed, it's not as clear where the dated prod ends.  Also, using subst:prod fills in the date for you.  :)  [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 20:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
527373 +++$+++ Avraham +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527371 +++$+++ 527371 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.148022360E09 +++$+++ Thank you for trying, demon, I'm sorry it didn't work out cleanly. --  +++$+++ :Thank you for trying, demon, I'm sorry it didn't work out cleanly. -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] 00:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

571062 +++$+++ Sharkface217 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571062 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-31 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.162291620E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For dedication to improving and expanding Wikipedia. Good job!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For dedication to improving and expanding Wikipedia. Good job! [[User:Sharkface217|Sharkface217]] 02:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
571063 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571062 +++$+++ 571062 +++$+++ 2006-10-31 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.162314720E09 +++$+++ Many Thanks! [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Many Thanks! [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 09:12, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
571064 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571062 +++$+++ 571063 +++$+++ 2006-10-31 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.162315140E09 +++$+++ They just keep rolling in.  Good work!  ''' +++$+++ ::They just keep rolling in.  Good work!  '''[[User:culverin|Culverin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 09:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
571065 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571062 +++$+++ 571064 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.162369080E09 +++$+++ Thanks, bro. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::Thanks, bro. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 00:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

90465 +++$+++ Evlekis +++$+++ Woodstone +++$+++ 90465 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-30 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.283223240E09 +++$+++ Hi Woodstone. I have for the moment restored my original version about national heights for the following reasons: I see your point that it is senseless comparing state with region, but on the whole, it is region and not state that counts. State discludes adjoining areas where the phenomenon applies but can also incorporate regions where it doesn't apply, after all, average height goes up and down in gradual stages as you travel. With anthropology, all factors are taken into account so as not to produce artificial data. In the US for example, there is variation between white, black and Latin. In Italy there is geographical variation with northerners significantly taller than southerners. Now I have no problem with ''editing'' my revision but there is no way we can remove sources and replace the text with erroneous information, and saying \"Dutch people are world's tallest\" is just that. And if states are essential, then it may be worth you knowing that there is one country entirely within the Dinaric Alps, that being Montenegro; and more often than not, people that know of the Montenegrins being tall speak only of them being tall forgetting about the neighbouring Herzegovinians and Dalmatians, yet I can tell you that the very tallest are in the Croatian hinterland and over into the Bosnian Krajina, but just like the suggestion than Frisians are on average taller than the people of Maastricht, it is original research. These are the things we need to consider.  +++$+++ Hi Woodstone. I have for the moment restored my original version about national heights for the following reasons: I see your point that it is senseless comparing state with region, but on the whole, it is region and not state that counts. State discludes adjoining areas where the phenomenon applies but can also incorporate regions where it doesn't apply, after all, average height goes up and down in gradual stages as you travel. With anthropology, all factors are taken into account so as not to produce artificial data. In the US for example, there is variation between white, black and Latin. In Italy there is geographical variation with northerners significantly taller than southerners. Now I have no problem with ''editing'' my revision but there is no way we can remove sources and replace the text with erroneous information, and saying "Dutch people are world's tallest" is just that. And if states are essential, then it may be worth you knowing that there is one country entirely within the Dinaric Alps, that being Montenegro; and more often than not, people that know of the Montenegrins being tall speak only of them being tall forgetting about the neighbouring Herzegovinians and Dalmatians, yet I can tell you that the very tallest are in the Croatian hinterland and over into the Bosnian Krajina, but just like the suggestion than Frisians are on average taller than the people of Maastricht, it is original research. These are the things we need to consider. [[User:Evlekis|Evlekis]] ('''Евлекис''') 19:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
90466 +++$+++ Woodstone +++$+++ Woodstone +++$+++ 90465 +++$+++ 90465 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.283259360E09 +++$+++ You rightly start above by talking about \"national heights\". Since this is an article about a country, you should only use country aggregated data to compare. I understand your reasoning about gradual geographic spread and racial influence, but that would belong in an article on \"human body\", not in a country article. If you can find sources showing a higher average length in Montenegro, (and it is deemed to be a country, I'm not keeping up with developments) you can state that fact. &minus; +++$+++ :You rightly start above by talking about "national heights". Since this is an article about a country, you should only use country aggregated data to compare. I understand your reasoning about gradual geographic spread and racial influence, but that would belong in an article on "human body", not in a country article. If you can find sources showing a higher average length in Montenegro, (and it is deemed to be a country, I'm not keeping up with developments) you can state that fact. &minus;[[User:Woodstone|Woodstone]] ([[User talk:Woodstone#top|talk]]) 05:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
90467 +++$+++ Evlekis +++$+++ Woodstone +++$+++ 90465 +++$+++ 90466 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.283378520E09 +++$+++ As it stands, another user reverted me back to your revision and so I found a better solution by adding the word \"among\" before \"the tallest\"; that now removes the need to restore all the irrelevant data I originally gave. It seems to have survived and given the variation in measurement applications from one source to the other, I may just add the word \"among\" on all the references to Dinarians being the tallest too (such as in the [[Dinaric Alps]] article). After all, it is more accurate and less insistent upon one fact that nobody can honestly prove. The Dinarians and the Dutch are most definitely the tallest, but which is bigger than the other is the hard part, and in any case, it is by mm and not cm. I won't revert again if anyone cancels my contribution but doing so would present a conflict in information between two articles. Thanks Woodstone.  +++$+++ ::As it stands, another user reverted me back to your revision and so I found a better solution by adding the word "among" before "the tallest"; that now removes the need to restore all the irrelevant data I originally gave. It seems to have survived and given the variation in measurement applications from one source to the other, I may just add the word "among" on all the references to Dinarians being the tallest too (such as in the [[Dinaric Alps]] article). After all, it is more accurate and less insistent upon one fact that nobody can honestly prove. The Dinarians and the Dutch are most definitely the tallest, but which is bigger than the other is the hard part, and in any case, it is by mm and not cm. I won't revert again if anyone cancels my contribution but doing so would present a conflict in information between two articles. Thanks Woodstone. [[User:Evlekis|Evlekis]] ('''Евлекис''') 15:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

542792 +++$+++  +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from 1994 baseball strike. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Canadian-Bacon t c e 03:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from 1994 baseball strike. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Canadian-Bacon t c e 03:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
542793 +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ Canadian-Bacon +++$+++ 542792 +++$+++ 542792 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 08:11:00 +++$+++ 1.172160660E09 +++$+++ The message was most likely left for another user, feel free to ignore future warnings like this.  +++$+++ :The message was most likely left for another user, feel free to ignore future warnings like this. [[User:Canadian-Bacon|''<font color="Red">Canadian</font>'']]-[[User_talk:Canadian-Bacon|'''''<font color="Black">Bacon'''''</font>]] 08:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

280649 +++$+++ Jimfbleak +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-03 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.141395840E09 +++$+++ I've now uploaded image:SLz20hanuman and image:SLz21hanuman as requested - these are the only copies I have on file and may not be the originals.  +++$+++ I've now uploaded image:SLz20hanuman and image:SLz21hanuman as requested - these are the only copies I have on file and may not be the originals. [[User:Jimfbleak|jimfbleak]] 06:24, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
280650 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280649 +++$+++ 280649 +++$+++ 2006-03-13 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.142280060E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I'll look into it soon, I hope.  +++$+++ :Thanks.  I'll look into it soon, I hope. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 12:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

280653 +++$+++ Dragons flight +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280653 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-20 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.150798260E09 +++$+++ I uploaded new versions of the two figures that you had reversed after flipping over the original vectorized copies.  At the same time I updated the licensing to reflect multilicensing options that I support.  In so doing, I took your name off the copyright notice, since it was no longer your modification but a new original with different licensing.  If you would like to put your name back as having created the original inverted copies feel free to do so, but I wanted to sidestep the appearance of a licensing conflict when uploading the new versions.   +++$+++ I uploaded new versions of the two figures that you had reversed after flipping over the original vectorized copies.  At the same time I updated the licensing to reflect multilicensing options that I support.  In so doing, I took your name off the copyright notice, since it was no longer your modification but a new original with different licensing.  If you would like to put your name back as having created the original inverted copies feel free to do so, but I wanted to sidestep the appearance of a licensing conflict when uploading the new versions.  [[User:Dragons flight|Dragons flight]] 03:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
280654 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280653 +++$+++ 280653 +++$+++ 2006-07-29 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.154220900E09 +++$+++ Looks good to me, and I'm happy to have full credit reassigned back to you, where it belongs.  +++$+++ : Looks good to me, and I'm happy to have full credit reassigned back to you, where it belongs. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 17:55, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

280655 +++$+++ Vedexent +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-29 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.159519920E09 +++$+++ Heh - thanks for fixing the link on my user page. I was uncertain anyone actually ''read'' those things :) -  +++$+++ Heh - thanks for fixing the link on my user page. I was uncertain anyone actually ''read'' those things :) - [[User:Vedexent|Vedexent]] ([[User talk:Vedexent|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Vedexent|contribs]]) - 01:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
280656 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280655 +++$+++ 280655 +++$+++ 2006-09-29 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.159547520E09 +++$+++ You are welcome.  +++$+++ :You are welcome. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 09:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
280657 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280655 +++$+++ 280655 +++$+++ 2006-10-06 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.160120340E09 +++$+++ You are welcome.  I apologize if I was a bit harsh in my edit summary on the [[Russian traditions and superstitions]] article, but you may note that I did not direct it at you personally.  Edit summaries can't be changed.  I was in a run of similar corrections of the kind of errors in English language usage that have proliferated dramatically in the last five years.  The error I fixed was repeated twice in the same sentence so it wasn't a simple oversight.  Please sign your comments on talk pages with four tildes to give proper attribution and time&date stamp.   +++$+++ : You are welcome.  I apologize if I was a bit harsh in my edit summary on the [[Russian traditions and superstitions]] article, but you may note that I did not direct it at you personally.  Edit summaries can't be changed.  I was in a run of similar corrections of the kind of errors in English language usage that have proliferated dramatically in the last five years.  The error I fixed was repeated twice in the same sentence so it wasn't a simple oversight.  Please sign your comments on talk pages with four tildes to give proper attribution and time&date stamp.  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 00:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

177848 +++$+++ Biosketch +++$+++ Gilabrand +++$+++ 177848 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-17 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.305632940E09 +++$+++ Just so you know, your edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Golan_Heights&diff=424522329&oldid=424519519 here] on 17 April is largely to blame for the recent escalation of passions at [[Golan Heights]]. Seeing as you've become involved in some heated verbal exchanges on the Discussion page there, I think restoring the map you removed from the infobox will be welcomed all around as a positive contribution in an NPOV spirit. Give it some thought.\u2014 +++$+++ Just so you know, your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Golan_Heights&diff=424522329&oldid=424519519 here] on 17 April is largely to blame for the recent escalation of passions at [[Golan Heights]]. Seeing as you've become involved in some heated verbal exchanges on the Discussion page there, I think restoring the map you removed from the infobox will be welcomed all around as a positive contribution in an NPOV spirit. Give it some thought.—[[User:Biosketch|Biosketch]] ([[User talk:Biosketch|talk]]) 04:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
177849 +++$+++ Gilabrand +++$+++ Gilabrand +++$+++ 177848 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 05:34:00 +++$+++ 1.305635640E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your suggestion, but the problems on that page were not started by me, nor will they end with me. I do not intend to re-add an image I think adds nothing, but if you believe that will end the squabbling (in your dreams), you can restore it yourself.-- +++$+++ ::Thank you for your suggestion, but the problems on that page were not started by me, nor will they end with me. I do not intend to re-add an image I think adds nothing, but if you believe that will end the squabbling (in your dreams), you can restore it yourself.--[[User:Gilabrand|Geewhiz]] ([[User talk:Gilabrand#top|talk]]) 05:34, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
177850 +++$+++ Biosketch +++$+++ Gilabrand +++$+++ 177848 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.305637740E09 +++$+++ I didn't mean to imply that you're to blame ''personally'' for what's happening now \u2013 just that the removal of the image, without replacing it with some other map, was open sesame for the next guy to come along and make a POV edit to the article.\u2014 +++$+++ :::I didn't mean to imply that you're to blame ''personally'' for what's happening now – just that the removal of the image, without replacing it with some other map, was open sesame for the next guy to come along and make a POV edit to the article.—[[User:Biosketch|Biosketch]] ([[User talk:Biosketch|talk]]) 06:09, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
177851 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ Gilabrand +++$+++ 177848 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.305641640E09 +++$+++ Even if the satellite map was re added to the infobox, it wouldn't in any way justify the removal of the neutral and accurate CIA map elsewhere in the article that shows the areas geography and politics. -- +++$+++ ::::Even if the satellite map was re added to the infobox, it wouldn't in any way justify the removal of the neutral and accurate CIA map elsewhere in the article that shows the areas geography and politics. --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 07:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
177852 +++$+++ Gilabrand +++$+++ Gilabrand +++$+++ 177848 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-17 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.305660900E09 +++$+++ You are the one who needs to do more reading. Advocacy sites are not RS for Wikipedia. Your personal views regarding the veracity of claims published in an RS do not belong on Wikipedia. From this long winded piece of verbiage you have left on my talk page, it is obvious that you have no interest in improving articles but fighting with people. You seem to be obsessed with this one article. Blanket reversion of my changes, which are all policy-based, will only prove to the administrators alerted to this case that you are a battle-minded SPA with no interest in improving the article.-- +++$+++ :::You are the one who needs to do more reading. Advocacy sites are not RS for Wikipedia. Your personal views regarding the veracity of claims published in an RS do not belong on Wikipedia. From this long winded piece of verbiage you have left on my talk page, it is obvious that you have no interest in improving articles but fighting with people. You seem to be obsessed with this one article. Blanket reversion of my changes, which are all policy-based, will only prove to the administrators alerted to this case that you are a battle-minded SPA with no interest in improving the article.--[[User:Gilabrand|Geewhiz]] ([[User talk:Gilabrand#top|talk]]) 12:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

280658 +++$+++ Nareek +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280658 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-06 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.160193900E09 +++$+++ I wanted to point out, though, not so much for the Chronology as for your broader disambiguation efforts--WP policy suggests not piping links that redirect from a topic to a broader topic, because those redirects are a clue as to when a chunk of an article should be spun off.  I believe there's a discussion at [[WP:PIPE]].  +++$+++ I wanted to point out, though, not so much for the Chronology as for your broader disambiguation efforts--WP policy suggests not piping links that redirect from a topic to a broader topic, because those redirects are a clue as to when a chunk of an article should be spun off.  I believe there's a discussion at [[WP:PIPE]]. [[User:Nareek|Nareek]] 21:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
280659 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280658 +++$+++ 280658 +++$+++ 2006-10-07 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.160205720E09 +++$+++ You are welcome.  I'm all in favor of \"projects\".  I understand the sense of that, but I think that articles and links should be clean and efficient.  If a topic needs to be spun off, it will make itself apparent by occupying increasing space inside another article.  +++$+++ : You are welcome.  I'm all in favor of "projects".  I understand the sense of that, but I think that articles and links should be clean and efficient.  If a topic needs to be spun off, it will make itself apparent by occupying increasing space inside another article. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 00:22, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

280660 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-07 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.160286180E09 +++$+++ If you have any thoughts on the content of what I changed, let me know on [[Talk:Variable Star]]. --  +++$+++ If you have any thoughts on the content of what I changed, let me know on [[Talk:Variable Star]]. -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 22:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
280661 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280660 +++$+++ 280660 +++$+++ 2006-10-07 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.160286420E09 +++$+++ I apologized for my original comment when I deleted it, because I had misinterpreted the edits.  Your edits were fine, which is why I deleted the comment.  Apparently my apology and correction were not enough for you.  I was mistaken.  I am sorry.  I apologize.  Okay?  +++$+++ : I apologized for my original comment when I deleted it, because I had misinterpreted the edits.  Your edits were fine, which is why I deleted the comment.  Apparently my apology and correction were not enough for you.  I was mistaken.  I am sorry.  I apologize.  Okay? [[User:Hu|Hu]] 22:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
280662 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280660 +++$+++ 280661 +++$+++ 2006-10-07 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.160287080E09 +++$+++ I guess my point is that I went through the entire article, making substantive changes, and your impulse was to snark about formatting details rather than content; it just seems a bit of a misplaced priority, you know?  That's all I was getting at.  But I'll drop it. --  +++$+++ ::I guess my point is that I went through the entire article, making substantive changes, and your impulse was to snark about formatting details rather than content; it just seems a bit of a misplaced priority, you know?  That's all I was getting at.  But I'll drop it. -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 22:58, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
280663 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280660 +++$+++ 280661 +++$+++ 2006-10-07 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.160287500E09 +++$+++ I've done my share of editing on content on Wikipedia, so I have no illusions about priorities.  In fact I created the very page you were editing, ''[[Variable Star]]''.  My original note on your talk page was in reaction to what I perceived to be a mistake (whether it was content or format, I perceived it as a mistake).  So in that note I simply directed you to the appropriate style guide.  However, it was me who was mistaken about your edit, so I retracted my comment and apologized.  I think you are being overly sensitive, especially since I apologized.  +++$+++ :: I've done my share of editing on content on Wikipedia, so I have no illusions about priorities.  In fact I created the very page you were editing, ''[[Variable Star]]''.  My original note on your talk page was in reaction to what I perceived to be a mistake (whether it was content or format, I perceived it as a mistake).  So in that note I simply directed you to the appropriate style guide.  However, it was me who was mistaken about your edit, so I retracted my comment and apologized.  I think you are being overly sensitive, especially since I apologized. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 23:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
280664 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280660 +++$+++ 280660 +++$+++ 2006-10-09 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.160386560E09 +++$+++ To push the term \"British\" in the context of the [[Commonwealth of Nations]] is to deny reality and to push an antiquated chauvinistic Britan-o-phile agenda.  This was all explained to you before you were banned, Aidan Work, banned for pushing political and chauvinistic agendas among other things.  Now, get with the program, please.  +++$+++ : To push the term "British" in the context of the [[Commonwealth of Nations]] is to deny reality and to push an antiquated chauvinistic Britan-o-phile agenda.  This was all explained to you before you were banned, Aidan Work, banned for pushing political and chauvinistic agendas among other things.  Now, get with the program, please. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 02:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
280665 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280660 +++$+++ 280664 +++$+++ 2006-10-09 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.160387580E09 +++$+++ Also speaking as a Wikipedian, and being completely ignorant of any backstory that might exist here, \"Now, get with the program\" seems a tad [[WP:civil|uncivil]]. --  +++$+++ ::Also speaking as a Wikipedian, and being completely ignorant of any backstory that might exist here, "Now, get with the program" seems a tad [[WP:civil|uncivil]]. -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 02:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
280666 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280660 +++$+++ 280664 +++$+++ 2006-10-09 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.160391540E09 +++$+++ And yes, there is a backstory.  The user, [[Special:Contributions\/Aidan Work|Aidan Work]] ([[User Talk:Aidan Work|talk]]), was banned in January 2006 for extremely uncivil behavior:  [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/Aidan_Work]].  So my request, phrased with a \"please\" to temper it, is actually a de-escalation.  It is my opinion that the user [[Special:Contributions\/Paisleyite1976|Paisleyite1976]] ([[User Talk:Paisleyite1976|talk]]), also posting as [[Special:Contributions\/202.180.98.82|202.180.98.82]] ([[User Talk:202.180.98.82|talk]]) and [[Special:Contributions\/202.180.72.84|202.180.72.84]] ([[User Talk:202.180.72.84|talk]]), should be banned on sight (cf. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Kiand&diff=prev&oldid=70883668]), but for the time being I've been letting things develop.  +++$+++ :: And yes, there is a backstory.  The user, [[Special:Contributions/Aidan Work|Aidan Work]] ([[User Talk:Aidan Work|talk]]), was banned in January 2006 for extremely uncivil behavior:  [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Aidan_Work]].  So my request, phrased with a "please" to temper it, is actually a de-escalation.  It is my opinion that the user [[Special:Contributions/Paisleyite1976|Paisleyite1976]] ([[User Talk:Paisleyite1976|talk]]), also posting as [[Special:Contributions/202.180.98.82|202.180.98.82]] ([[User Talk:202.180.98.82|talk]]) and [[Special:Contributions/202.180.72.84|202.180.72.84]] ([[User Talk:202.180.72.84|talk]]), should be banned on sight (cf. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kiand&diff=prev&oldid=70883668]), but for the time being I've been letting things develop. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 03:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
280667 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280660 +++$+++ 280666 +++$+++ 2006-10-09 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.160392380E09 +++$+++ From a quick scan, the similarities between the interests of [[Special:Contributions\/Paisleyite1976|Paisleyite1976]] and [[Special:Contributions\/Aidan_Work|Aidan Work]] seem more than coincidental. --  +++$+++ :::From a quick scan, the similarities between the interests of [[Special:Contributions/Paisleyite1976|Paisleyite1976]] and [[Special:Contributions/Aidan_Work|Aidan Work]] seem more than coincidental. -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 04:13, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

18523 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ Gokhantig +++$+++ 18523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-11 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.281550320E09 +++$+++ Hi! For people categorized under \"Turkish people of Ethiopian descent\" there is no need to add the category \"Turkish people of African descent, since the latter incorporates the former anyway. You can revert your relevant additions for conformity. +++$+++ Hi! For people categorized under "Turkish people of Ethiopian descent" there is no need to add the category "Turkish people of African descent, since the latter incorporates the former anyway. You can revert your relevant additions for conformity.[[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee|talk]]) 11:12, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
18524 +++$+++ CeeGee +++$+++ Gokhantig +++$+++ 18523 +++$+++ 18523 +++$+++ 2010-08-14 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.281837540E09 +++$+++ Hi again! I see you have ignored my notice. So, I did it for you. +++$+++ :Hi again! I see you have ignored my notice. So, I did it for you.[[User:CeeGee|CeeGee]] ([[User talk:CeeGee|talk]]) 18:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

280668 +++$+++ Djdaedalus +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280668 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-10 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.160465040E09 +++$+++ I did look at the history.  The article was never very long, and only recently acquired the section on the Waldo, which I copied.  Do what you must, but please keep the new article intact.   +++$+++ I did look at the history.  The article was never very long, and only recently acquired the section on the Waldo, which I copied.  Do what you must, but please keep the new article intact.  [[User:Djdaedalus|Djdaedalus]] 00:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
280669 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280668 +++$+++ 280668 +++$+++ 2006-10-10 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.160544540E09 +++$+++ The move has been accomplished, with the help of an Admin.  The article history and your most recent edits are now at [[Waldo (short story)]].  +++$+++ : The move has been accomplished, with the help of an Admin.  The article history and your most recent edits are now at [[Waldo (short story)]]. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 22:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
280670 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280668 +++$+++ 280668 +++$+++ 2006-10-11 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.160556360E09 +++$+++ I see that the [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Aidan Work|banned]] Aidan Work \/ Paisleyite1976 is back trolling, unable to learn his lessons and badly in need of anger management classes and christian humility.  +++$+++ : I see that the [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Aidan Work|banned]] Aidan Work / Paisleyite1976 is back trolling, unable to learn his lessons and badly in need of anger management classes and christian humility. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 01:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
280671 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280668 +++$+++ 280668 +++$+++ 2006-10-11 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.160556960E09 +++$+++ zzzZZZzZzz  +++$+++ : zzzZZZzZzz [[User:Hu|Hu]] 01:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
280672 +++$+++ Chris53516 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280668 +++$+++ 280671 +++$+++ 2006-10-12 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.160701440E09 +++$+++ How stupid. Why do people waste their time with such petty insults? Keep up the good ignoring, Hu.  +++$+++ ::How stupid. Why do people waste their time with such petty insults? Keep up the good ignoring, Hu. [[User:Chris53516|Chris53516]] 18:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
280673 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280668 +++$+++ 280668 +++$+++ 2006-10-13 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.160806200E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your note.  Please sign all comments on Talk pages with four tildes <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki> so that the time, the date, and the user ID or IP address is automatically stamped.  Regarding the [[Platinum Edition]] DVDs, the anonymous IP was making vandal edits on other articles at the time, and the changes on the DVDs article were major.  If a user wants to not be reverted, they are advised to create a user name and then never make vandal edits with it.  +++$+++ : Thank you for your note.  Please sign all comments on Talk pages with four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> so that the time, the date, and the user ID or IP address is automatically stamped.  Regarding the [[Platinum Edition]] DVDs, the anonymous IP was making vandal edits on other articles at the time, and the changes on the DVDs article were major.  If a user wants to not be reverted, they are advised to create a user name and then never make vandal edits with it. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 23:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

527376 +++$+++ IanManka +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527376 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-19 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.148032860E09 +++$+++ When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to [[Wikipedia:Template substitution|substitute with text]] by adding '''subst:''' to the template tag. For example, use &#123;&#123;subst:test&#125;&#125; instead of &#123;{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. <!-- Template:Subst -->  \u2014  +++$+++ When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to [[Wikipedia:Template substitution|substitute with text]] by adding '''subst:''' to the template tag. For example, use &#123;&#123;subst:test&#125;&#125; instead of &#123;{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. <!-- Template:Subst -->  — [[User:IanManka|Ian Manka]] <small>[[User talk:IanManka|Talk to me‼]]</small> 03:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
527377 +++$+++ IanManka +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527376 +++$+++ 527376 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.148033580E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about not subst:ing -- no one is perfect. You forgot to subst: at [[User talk:Xtenitoffice]]. If you have any further questions, go to my talk page. Happy editing! \u2014  +++$+++ :Don't worry about not subst:ing -- no one is perfect. You forgot to subst: at [[User talk:Xtenitoffice]]. If you have any further questions, go to my talk page. Happy editing! — [[User:IanManka|Ian Manka]] <small>[[User talk:IanManka|Talk to me‼]]</small> 03:13, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

280674 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-16 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.161055080E09 +++$+++ I'd like your opinion on a new question.  There are a lot of red-links in [[Expanded Universe (Heinlein)]] and [[Requiem (book)]].  Would it be worthwhile (for me or someone) to start fleshing those out?  In particular, I can see [[Who Are the Heirs of Patrick Henry?]] being an interesting article. --  +++$+++ I'd like your opinion on a new question.  There are a lot of red-links in [[Expanded Universe (Heinlein)]] and [[Requiem (book)]].  Would it be worthwhile (for me or someone) to start fleshing those out?  In particular, I can see [[Who Are the Heirs of Patrick Henry?]] being an interesting article. -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 20:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
280675 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280674 +++$+++ 280674 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.161056100E09 +++$+++ I encourage you to create articles about the Heinlein stories and articles.  They are all deserving of articles and analysis.  More content, not less.  I've thought of adding some myself, and I have done so from time to time.  +++$+++ : I encourage you to create articles about the Heinlein stories and articles.  They are all deserving of articles and analysis.  More content, not less.  I've thought of adding some myself, and I have done so from time to time. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 20:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
280676 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280674 +++$+++ 280675 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.161056820E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I appreciate the kind words.  A few days ago, I printed out all of the existing Heinlein-related articles, with the intention of reviewing them as a group.  It's a daunting job; there's a lot of content there.  Now I'm thinking a more practical approach would be to start by creating stubs for the redlinks, then reevaluate.  I have this vague idea that it would be nice to add predecessor and successor links in the future history stories, but I haven't really investigated what would be involved. --  +++$+++ ::Thanks, I appreciate the kind words.  A few days ago, I printed out all of the existing Heinlein-related articles, with the intention of reviewing them as a group.  It's a daunting job; there's a lot of content there.  Now I'm thinking a more practical approach would be to start by creating stubs for the redlinks, then reevaluate.  I have this vague idea that it would be nice to add predecessor and successor links in the future history stories, but I haven't really investigated what would be involved. -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 20:47, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
280677 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280674 +++$+++ 280675 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.161062880E09 +++$+++ I would suggest not creating stubs for redlinks unless substantial material can be written (about the size of \"[[A Bathroom of Her Own]]\" when I created it.  At that length they still qualify for stub tags, but the red links are flags for what needs a basic article.  On the other hand, if your successor\/predecessor link idea is implemented, that will be a powerful incentive to create articles regardless of how small or stubby they are.  +++$+++ :: I would suggest not creating stubs for redlinks unless substantial material can be written (about the size of "[[A Bathroom of Her Own]]" when I created it.  At that length they still qualify for stub tags, but the red links are flags for what needs a basic article.  On the other hand, if your successor/predecessor link idea is implemented, that will be a powerful incentive to create articles regardless of how small or stubby they are. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 22:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

571067 +++$+++ Drizzt Jamo +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-31 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.162362720E09 +++$+++ I salute you,  +++$+++ I salute you, [[User:Drizzt Jamo|Jamo]] 22:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
571068 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571067 +++$+++ 571067 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.162373580E09 +++$+++ Exellent. It's all falling into place. [[User:DoomsDay349\/WikiWar|To the front!]] [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Exellent. It's all falling into place. [[User:DoomsDay349/WikiWar|To the front!]] [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 01:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
571069 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571067 +++$+++ 571068 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 07:48:00 +++$+++ 1.162396080E09 +++$+++ I have more than you could possibly imagine!  You .......... '''[[User:culverin|Culv]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::I have more than you could possibly imagine!  You .......... '''[[User:culverin|Culv]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|rin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 07:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
571070 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571067 +++$+++ 571069 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.162405140E09 +++$+++ Qua?  What the hell are you making reference to? [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::Qua?  What the hell are you making reference to? [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 10:19, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
571071 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571067 +++$+++ 571070 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.162406040E09 +++$+++ Qau? '''[[User:culverin|Culv]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::::Qau? '''[[User:culverin|Culv]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|rin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 10:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
571072 +++$+++ Drizzt Jamo +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571067 +++$+++ 571071 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.162470660E09 +++$+++ Shut up [[user:Culverin|Culverin]]. Also [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.msc]] if you have the time [[user:Neo_coops|Jacob's page]] needs some work. He asked me to tell you.  +++$+++ :::::Shut up [[user:Culverin|Culverin]]. Also [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.msc]] if you have the time [[user:Neo_coops|Jacob's page]] needs some work. He asked me to tell you. [[User:Drizzt Jamo|Jamo]] 04:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
571073 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571067 +++$+++ 571072 +++$+++ 2006-11-02 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.162474200E09 +++$+++ Ok, he is welcomed to the community, he has to specify what  he wants done so I can do it though. Culverin, please conduct yourself appropriately. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::::::Ok, he is welcomed to the community, he has to specify what  he wants done so I can do it though. Culverin, please conduct yourself appropriately. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 05:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

542821 +++$+++ Tillman +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542821 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-05 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.265424480E09 +++$+++ Could you please update the file page to reflect this. Thanks,  +++$+++ Could you please update the file page to reflect this. Thanks, [[User:Tillman|Pete Tillman]] ([[User talk:Tillman|talk]]) 18:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
542822 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542821 +++$+++ 542821 +++$+++ 2010-02-05 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.265424840E09 +++$+++ Hi, sorry but omething went wrong when I marked the file. The problem is not the license on Flickr but that it is a photo of a copyrighted work. I tried to add that to the reason for marking the file that way. -- +++$+++ :Hi, sorry but omething went wrong when I marked the file. The problem is not the license on Flickr but that it is a photo of a copyrighted work. I tried to add that to the reason for marking the file that way. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 18:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
542823 +++$+++ Tillman +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542821 +++$+++ 542822 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.265683320E09 +++$+++ Thanks, got it now. If we have to go to Fair Use, I think we should use a better image. I'll upload one sometime.  +++$+++ ::Thanks, got it now. If we have to go to Fair Use, I think we should use a better image. I'll upload one sometime. [[User:Tillman|Pete Tillman]] ([[User talk:Tillman|talk]]) 18:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
542824 +++$+++ Tillman +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542821 +++$+++ 542823 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.265709420E09 +++$+++ Done. You may want to reduce size, if you think that necessary. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::Done. You may want to reduce size, if you think that necessary. Cheers, [[User:Tillman|Pete Tillman]] ([[User talk:Tillman|talk]]) 01:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

18534 +++$+++ Ponyo +++$+++ Gokhantig +++$+++ 18534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-07 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.299541140E09 +++$+++ Please do not add religion, ethnic, or descent categories to biography articles as you did at [[Rasim Tagirbekov ]] without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by sourced article content and 2) the individual identifies as such. Please see [[WP:EGRS]] and [[WP:BLPCAT]] for additional information.-- +++$+++ Please do not add religion, ethnic, or descent categories to biography articles as you did at [[Rasim Tagirbekov ]] without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by sourced article content and 2) the individual identifies as such. Please see [[WP:EGRS]] and [[WP:BLPCAT]] for additional information.--[[User:Ponyo|<b><font color="Navy">''Jezebel's''</font></b><font color="Navy">Ponyo</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 15:39, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
18535 +++$+++  +++$+++ Gokhantig +++$+++ 18534 +++$+++ 18534 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 08:58:00 +++$+++ 1.299776280E09 +++$+++ [[Rasim Tagirbekov]] is of [[Dagestan]]i descent and lot of people etc [[Mesut \xd6zil]], [[Xavi Hernandez]], [[Mario Balotelli]] has theirs ethnic categories. Why i can't add [[Rasim Tagirbekov|Rasim]]'s ethnic category page in his information? Can you explain me because i didn't understand why you are warning me. -- +++$+++ :[[Rasim Tagirbekov]] is of [[Dagestan]]i descent and lot of people etc [[Mesut Özil]], [[Xavi Hernandez]], [[Mario Balotelli]] has theirs ethnic categories. Why i can't add [[Rasim Tagirbekov|Rasim]]'s ethnic category page in his information? Can you explain me because i didn't understand why you are warning me. --[[User:Gokhantig|<b><font color="Navy">''Gökhan Tığ</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Gokhantig]]</sup> 08:58, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
18536 +++$+++ Ponyo +++$+++ Gokhantig +++$+++ 18534 +++$+++ 18535 +++$+++ 2011-03-10 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.299794760E09 +++$+++ {{whisperback|Ponyo}} -- +++$+++ ::{{whisperback|Ponyo}} --[[User:Ponyo|<b><font color="Navy">''Jezebel's''</font></b><font color="Navy">Ponyo</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 14:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

280680 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-16 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.161061380E09 +++$+++ About predecessor \/ successor links, I think the way to go would be a sidebar box with useful (I hope) summary info, but I would like to see it kept spatially compact.  It is a lot of work, but I think it would ultimately be a boon since it would encourage sequential browsing, which is a highly effective web navigation system.  +++$+++ About predecessor / successor links, I think the way to go would be a sidebar box with useful (I hope) summary info, but I would like to see it kept spatially compact.  It is a lot of work, but I think it would ultimately be a boon since it would encourage sequential browsing, which is a highly effective web navigation system. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 22:03, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
280681 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280680 +++$+++ 280680 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.161061980E09 +++$+++ Here's an interesting question about those hypothetical predecessor\/successor links:  Do we include the \"stories not yet written\" in the chronology?  If we do, they'd clearly have to be stubs and they could never be significant articles, but you could argue that they have a place in the future history.  (You could also argue that they never existed outside of the chart and presumably some story notes, so they're not entitled to individual articles.) --  +++$+++ :Here's an interesting question about those hypothetical predecessor/successor links:  Do we include the "stories not yet written" in the chronology?  If we do, they'd clearly have to be stubs and they could never be significant articles, but you could argue that they have a place in the future history.  (You could also argue that they never existed outside of the chart and presumably some story notes, so they're not entitled to individual articles.) -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 22:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
280682 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280680 +++$+++ 280681 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.161062580E09 +++$+++ I would suggest only published stories and in order of initial publication.  I would include all published works.  It should be possible to have three sets of successor\/predecessor links for each story:  s\/p published work, s\/p story, and s\/p Future History story.  Only the FH stories would have all three.  This supposes that the sidebar boxes would be generic to Heinlein publications, and not just the Future History stories.  I would not suggest articles for unwritten FH stories since they would be non-notable and subject to deletion.  +++$+++ :: I would suggest only published stories and in order of initial publication.  I would include all published works.  It should be possible to have three sets of successor/predecessor links for each story:  s/p published work, s/p story, and s/p Future History story.  Only the FH stories would have all three.  This supposes that the sidebar boxes would be generic to Heinlein publications, and not just the Future History stories.  I would not suggest articles for unwritten FH stories since they would be non-notable and subject to deletion. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 22:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
280683 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280680 +++$+++ 280682 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.161063180E09 +++$+++ You're right; it would have to be publication date.  In too many cases, the date of original writing ends up being speculative original research.  In your three categories, what's the distinction between \"published work\" and \"story\"? --  +++$+++ ::: You're right; it would have to be publication date.  In too many cases, the date of original writing ends up being speculative original research.  In your three categories, what's the distinction between "published work" and "story"? -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 22:33, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
280684 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280680 +++$+++ 280682 +++$+++ 2006-10-16 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.161063300E09 +++$+++ Published work includes novels and non-fiction.  +++$+++ ::: Published work includes novels and non-fiction. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 22:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

542825 +++$+++ Daniel Christensen +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-13 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.266078240E09 +++$+++ I don;t like commons because when i try to link things in the description it never works because it links only to commons. what is that?  +++$+++ I don;t like commons because when i try to link things in the description it never works because it links only to commons. what is that? [[User:Daniel Christensen|Daniel Christensen]] ([[User talk:Daniel Christensen|talk]]) 08:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
542826 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542825 +++$+++ 542825 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.266091260E09 +++$+++ Hi Daniel. You can link from commons to any Wikipedia by adding :en: in the beginning of the link or :de: for German etc. Syntax is like this [[:en:Daniel]] or [[:de:Daniel]] or [[:Commons:Daniel]]. If you need any help you are welcome to ask. I may reply faster if you ask on my userpage on Commons. -- +++$+++ :Hi Daniel. You can link from commons to any Wikipedia by adding :en: in the beginning of the link or :de: for German etc. Syntax is like this [[:en:Daniel]] or [[:de:Daniel]] or [[:Commons:Daniel]]. If you need any help you are welcome to ask. I may reply faster if you ask on my userpage on Commons. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 12:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
542827 +++$+++ Daniel Christensen +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542825 +++$+++ 542826 +++$+++ 2010-02-13 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.266115620E09 +++$+++ all right yeah I knew it could be done and I knew commons was better for some reason like how you can categorize photos but I mean are they really more likely to get seen and used if they are there; cause I mean I browsed through and it seemed like there were sooooo many unused and random pictures that it was kind of surplus; it seems like every image uploaded straight to a project gets used because it was uploaded for a reason.  +++$+++ ::all right yeah I knew it could be done and I knew commons was better for some reason like how you can categorize photos but I mean are they really more likely to get seen and used if they are there; cause I mean I browsed through and it seemed like there were sooooo many unused and random pictures that it was kind of surplus; it seems like every image uploaded straight to a project gets used because it was uploaded for a reason. [[User:Daniel Christensen|Daniel Christensen]] ([[User talk:Daniel Christensen|talk]]) 18:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
542828 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542825 +++$+++ 542827 +++$+++ 2010-02-14 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.266176640E09 +++$+++ :-) I replyed on [[:commons:User talk:MGA73#Uploading to commons]]. -- +++$+++ ::: :-) I replyed on [[:commons:User talk:MGA73#Uploading to commons]]. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 11:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

265234 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-25 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.264410720E09 +++$+++ '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a [[WP:BOT|bot]]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- +++$+++ '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a [[WP:BOT|bot]]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 01:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
265235 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265234 +++$+++ 265234 +++$+++ 2010-01-27 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.264612980E09 +++$+++ This is a welcome message to the Wikipedia project. If it bothers you please ignore it.  +++$+++ :This is a welcome message to the Wikipedia project. If it bothers you please ignore it. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 09:23, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

18542 +++$+++ HalJor +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18542 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-22 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.219458840E09 +++$+++ As I've noted at [[Talk:Gigolo]], I don't support the move you did this morning.  I understand your reasoning that the original title was \"sexist\", but you chose a specifically heterosexual term (I listed five citations).  I believe the considerable male-male interaction warrants a more neutral term, if any such move is necessary (and I'm not convinced that it is).  +++$+++ As I've noted at [[Talk:Gigolo]], I don't support the move you did this morning.  I understand your reasoning that the original title was "sexist", but you chose a specifically heterosexual term (I listed five citations).  I believe the considerable male-male interaction warrants a more neutral term, if any such move is necessary (and I'm not convinced that it is). [[User:HalJor|HalJor]] ([[User talk:HalJor|talk]]) 19:34, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
18543 +++$+++ Davodd +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18542 +++$+++ 18542 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.219459140E09 +++$+++ Then perhaps we should make it an article on [[Street hustler]], since that is the gist of the current article. -  +++$+++ :Then perhaps we should make it an article on [[Street hustler]], since that is the gist of the current article. - [[User:Davodd|Davodd]] ([[User talk:Davodd#top|talk]]) 19:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
18544 +++$+++ HalJor +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18542 +++$+++ 18543 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.219460700E09 +++$+++ But it's not the gist of the article. There's an entire section on Venues: streets, bars, print, online, bathhouses, and brothels. And to make things more complex, each venue seems to have its own term for the prostitute. If there's no generic alternative, the original title \"male prostitution\" is most appropriate.  +++$+++ ::But it's not the gist of the article. There's an entire section on Venues: streets, bars, print, online, bathhouses, and brothels. And to make things more complex, each venue seems to have its own term for the prostitute. If there's no generic alternative, the original title "male prostitution" is most appropriate. [[User:HalJor|HalJor]] ([[User talk:HalJor|talk]]) 20:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
18545 +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18542 +++$+++ 18544 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.219461180E09 +++$+++ Not to butt in on your discussion, but I have to agree with Haljor on this. The goal is to have a neutral article title, not a pejorative one.  Gigolo is a heavily laden term and not appropriate for same-sex usage.  And the article is not just about street hustlers.  \"Male prostitution\" was, despite any perceived sexism, the best overall term.-  +++$+++ :::Not to butt in on your discussion, but I have to agree with Haljor on this. The goal is to have a neutral article title, not a pejorative one.  Gigolo is a heavily laden term and not appropriate for same-sex usage.  And the article is not just about street hustlers.  "Male prostitution" was, despite any perceived sexism, the best overall term.- [[User:NYArtsnWords|NYArtsnWords]] ([[User talk:NYArtsnWords|talk]]) 20:13, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
18546 +++$+++ Davodd +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18542 +++$+++ 18545 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.219466340E09 +++$+++ I think a good compromise would be, [[Prostitution of males]] since it is parallel with an existing name structure, i.e. [[Prostitution of children]] and in structure is not sexist in its naming scheme. -  +++$+++ :::: I think a good compromise would be, [[Prostitution of males]] since it is parallel with an existing name structure, i.e. [[Prostitution of children]] and in structure is not sexist in its naming scheme. - [[User:Davodd|Davodd]] ([[User talk:Davodd|talk]]) 21:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
18547 +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18542 +++$+++ 18544 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.219461480E09 +++$+++ I also think that [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] should have been required in this case.  I strongly believe that the page should be moved back for now and that a \"request move\" be added to address your issues. -  +++$+++ :::I also think that [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] should have been required in this case.  I strongly believe that the page should be moved back for now and that a "request move" be added to address your issues. - [[User:NYArtsnWords|NYArtsnWords]] ([[User talk:NYArtsnWords|talk]]) 20:18, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
18548 +++$+++ Davodd +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18542 +++$+++ 18547 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.219466340E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] is an optional use page created for non-administrators who need help in moving an article that cannot be moved without deleting a page (so, by definition it does not apply to me as I have been an admin for years). Also, you propose changing an optional venue into a mandatory one - which is added bureaucracy (see [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy]]) that is both anti-wiki and unneeded. (for further information on this, see [[WP:CREEP]]). -  +++$+++ ::::[[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] is an optional use page created for non-administrators who need help in moving an article that cannot be moved without deleting a page (so, by definition it does not apply to me as I have been an admin for years). Also, you propose changing an optional venue into a mandatory one - which is added bureaucracy (see [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy]]) that is both anti-wiki and unneeded. (for further information on this, see [[WP:CREEP]]). - [[User:Davodd|Davodd]] ([[User talk:Davodd|talk]]) 21:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
18549 +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18542 +++$+++ 18548 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.219467840E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] is not \"an optional use page...for non-administrators who need help in moving an article\".  It is a page for '''controversial moves''': \"In some situations, the value of a move may be under dispute, and discussion is necessary in order to reach a consensus.\"  Sure, Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy... but it is also built on discussion and consensus, which a sudden page move does not facilitate. -  +++$+++ :::::[[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] is not "an optional use page...for non-administrators who need help in moving an article".  It is a page for '''controversial moves''': "In some situations, the value of a move may be under dispute, and discussion is necessary in order to reach a consensus."  Sure, Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy... but it is also built on discussion and consensus, which a sudden page move does not facilitate. - [[User:NYArtsnWords|NYArtsnWords]] ([[User talk:NYArtsnWords#top|talk]]) 22:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
18550 +++$+++ Davodd +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18542 +++$+++ 18549 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.219469160E09 +++$+++ Am am sorry that you appear to have become so emotionally upset by a simple article move. Whether you like it or not, [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] is optional and was written for non-admins (check the history of the discussion as to how and why it was created). Most WP guidelines are optional. Wikipedia is built upon discussion and consensus - and in this case, my move started one. The beauty of wiki - as opposed to peer-reviewed academia - is that changes usually happen DURING the consensus building. That is the spirit of wiki -- not bringing everything to a standstill until consesnus is achieved. -  +++$+++ ::::::Am am sorry that you appear to have become so emotionally upset by a simple article move. Whether you like it or not, [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] is optional and was written for non-admins (check the history of the discussion as to how and why it was created). Most WP guidelines are optional. Wikipedia is built upon discussion and consensus - and in this case, my move started one. The beauty of wiki - as opposed to peer-reviewed academia - is that changes usually happen DURING the consensus building. That is the spirit of wiki -- not bringing everything to a standstill until consesnus is achieved. - [[User:Davodd|Davodd]] ([[User talk:Davodd|talk]]) 22:26, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
18551 +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18542 +++$+++ 18550 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.219470000E09 +++$+++ Re: \"so emotionally upset\" - please avoid [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]] (see also [[Wikipedia:Civility]]).  No one is asking for \"peer-reviewed academia\" - just some discussion before controversial changes are put forward.-  +++$+++ :::::::Re: "so emotionally upset" - please avoid [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]] (see also [[Wikipedia:Civility]]).  No one is asking for "peer-reviewed academia" - just some discussion before controversial changes are put forward.- [[User:NYArtsnWords|NYArtsnWords]] ([[User talk:NYArtsnWords#top|talk]]) 22:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
18552 +++$+++ Davodd +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18542 +++$+++ 18551 +++$+++ 2008-08-22 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.219470720E09 +++$+++ I am sorry that you percieved my apology to be a personal attack. That was not my intention. I based my assumption - which is apparently wrong in your case - that use of exclamation marks in talk page comments is a sign of being emotionally upset. -  +++$+++ ::::::::I am sorry that you percieved my apology to be a personal attack. That was not my intention. I based my assumption - which is apparently wrong in your case - that use of exclamation marks in talk page comments is a sign of being emotionally upset. - [[User:Davodd|Davodd]] ([[User talk:Davodd|talk]]) 22:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

308925 +++$+++ Mervyn Emrys +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-23 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.230099120E09 +++$+++ If you want people like me to make ANY contributions to Wikipedia, you need to come up with a better song than the one you are singing.  +++$+++ If you want people like me to make ANY contributions to Wikipedia, you need to come up with a better song than the one you are singing. [[User:Mervyn Emrys|Mervyn Emrys]] ([[User talk:Mervyn Emrys|talk]]) 22:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
308926 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308925 +++$+++ 308925 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.230103380E09 +++$+++ My, you do seem to have a rather high-handed tone. I did look, and can see a good argument for leaving this list out of the article. If you want it kept, the best idea is to present a reasoned case that it's a good idea, and meet [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NOR]] by presenting sources showing that the list is recognised as essential reading when learning about US law in general, while ensuring that reading material about specific areas of law is presented on relevant pages rather than the main page. Better still, cite these books as sources for parts of the article so what they say is clearly linked from inline citations. I do appreciate that an established author can be used to having things their way and so find it hard to work within Wikipedia policies, but that's the song you've to sing. .  +++$+++ :My, you do seem to have a rather high-handed tone. I did look, and can see a good argument for leaving this list out of the article. If you want it kept, the best idea is to present a reasoned case that it's a good idea, and meet [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NOR]] by presenting sources showing that the list is recognised as essential reading when learning about US law in general, while ensuring that reading material about specific areas of law is presented on relevant pages rather than the main page. Better still, cite these books as sources for parts of the article so what they say is clearly linked from inline citations. I do appreciate that an established author can be used to having things their way and so find it hard to work within Wikipedia policies, but that's the song you've to sing. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 23:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
308927 +++$+++ Mervyn Emrys +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308925 +++$+++ 308926 +++$+++ 2008-12-24 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.230120420E09 +++$+++ I've placed the annotated list on the talk page of the article with a request that anyone who pleases assist in figuring out which individual items may be appropriate for \"Further reading\" for this article and which are not. Let's get down to specifics and see if we can come up with something besides conflict? I'd like to see specific reasons why each source is bad, not just sweeping generalizations. Discussion of edits, after all, is about specifics. Politics is about generalizations.  +++$+++ ::I've placed the annotated list on the talk page of the article with a request that anyone who pleases assist in figuring out which individual items may be appropriate for "Further reading" for this article and which are not. Let's get down to specifics and see if we can come up with something besides conflict? I'd like to see specific reasons why each source is bad, not just sweeping generalizations. Discussion of edits, after all, is about specifics. Politics is about generalizations. [[User:Mervyn Emrys|Mervyn Emrys]] ([[User talk:Mervyn Emrys|talk]]) 04:07, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
308928 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308925 +++$+++ 308927 +++$+++ 2008-12-24 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.230154440E09 +++$+++ Better, but the page is already 31 kilobytes long and the long list invites a [[WP:TL;DR]] response. If you can pick out four books that you consider essential reading for someone wanting an overview, that would be better. However, why not pick up on Elonka's suggestion and use the best of the books as inline citations for paragraphs in the article. You'd get the list you want if you, in agreement with other editors, can change the referencing system to [[Parenthetical referencing|Harvard referencing]] with inline [[Template:Harvard citation]] cites linking to a '''Notes''' section to show page numbers, then a separate  '''References''' section with each book listed alphabetically using [[Template:Citation|Citation]] templates. That way the reference\/page number in the \"notes\" links down to the relevant book source, and you get a nice list of references. See [[Charles Darwin]] for an example. . .  +++$+++ :::Better, but the page is already 31 kilobytes long and the long list invites a [[WP:TL;DR]] response. If you can pick out four books that you consider essential reading for someone wanting an overview, that would be better. However, why not pick up on Elonka's suggestion and use the best of the books as inline citations for paragraphs in the article. You'd get the list you want if you, in agreement with other editors, can change the referencing system to [[Parenthetical referencing|Harvard referencing]] with inline [[Template:Harvard citation]] cites linking to a '''Notes''' section to show page numbers, then a separate  '''References''' section with each book listed alphabetically using [[Template:Citation|Citation]] templates. That way the reference/page number in the "notes" links down to the relevant book source, and you get a nice list of references. See [[Charles Darwin]] for an example. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 13:34, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
308929 +++$+++ Mervyn Emrys +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308925 +++$+++ 308928 +++$+++ 2008-12-26 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.230290580E09 +++$+++ So, the principle concern is about length of article rather than content? Funny how so many proprietary editors find it so easy to make work for somebody else rather than stepping forward to do some work themselves? In my opinion, the burden is on somebody to address the concerns identified, rather than on me under [[WP:Bold]]--unless one wishes to be merely obstructionist. I'm not here to give somebody targets to shoot down. I'm all about content. Are you? Easier to pick out four paragraphs that don't need to be included in the article at all.  +++$+++ ::::So, the principle concern is about length of article rather than content? Funny how so many proprietary editors find it so easy to make work for somebody else rather than stepping forward to do some work themselves? In my opinion, the burden is on somebody to address the concerns identified, rather than on me under [[WP:Bold]]--unless one wishes to be merely obstructionist. I'm not here to give somebody targets to shoot down. I'm all about content. Are you? Easier to pick out four paragraphs that don't need to be included in the article at all. [[User:Mervyn Emrys|Mervyn Emrys]] ([[User talk:Mervyn Emrys|talk]]) 03:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
308930 +++$+++ Hrafn +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308925 +++$+++ 308929 +++$+++ 2008-12-26 05:58:00 +++$+++ 1.230299880E09 +++$+++ I would suggest that ''comprehensibility'' should win over content. Long lists (and long articles) quite frequently lose readers, unless they have sufficient structure (headings etc) to provide a 'roadmap'. The proposed 'Further Readings' section would appear to be a textbook example of what to avoid. <font face=\"Antiqua, serif\">'' +++$+++ :::::I would suggest that ''comprehensibility'' should win over content. Long lists (and long articles) quite frequently lose readers, unless they have sufficient structure (headings etc) to provide a 'roadmap'. The proposed 'Further Readings' section would appear to be a textbook example of what to avoid. <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub>''</font> 05:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
308931 +++$+++ Mervyn Emrys +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308925 +++$+++ 308928 +++$+++ 2008-12-30 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.230698100E09 +++$+++ Is it possible that one has not noticed the reading list with a mere six references that was placed in the article some days ago?  +++$+++ ::::Is it possible that one has not noticed the reading list with a mere six references that was placed in the article some days ago? [[User:Mervyn Emrys|Mervyn Emrys]] ([[User talk:Mervyn Emrys|talk]]) 20:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
308932 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308925 +++$+++ 308931 +++$+++ 2008-12-30 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.230698520E09 +++$+++ Yes, I have noticed a rather condescending tone in some of your comments as well, and the two of you need to address each other as editors without pulling rank. Anything's possible, and I'm glad to note your much shorter list. Do try to discuss the pros and cons in a collegiate way without bothering about taking offence. All the best for the New Year when it comes, .  +++$+++ :::::Yes, I have noticed a rather condescending tone in some of your comments as well, and the two of you need to address each other as editors without pulling rank. Anything's possible, and I'm glad to note your much shorter list. Do try to discuss the pros and cons in a collegiate way without bothering about taking offence. All the best for the New Year when it comes, . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

280688 +++$+++ MichaelBillington +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-23 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.161626220E09 +++$+++ In catching all those vandals, you've beaten me to reverting twice this hour, keep it up :D  +++$+++ In catching all those vandals, you've beaten me to reverting twice this hour, keep it up :D [[User:MichaelBillington|Michael Billington]] ([[User talk:MichaelBillington|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MichaelBillington|contribs]]) 10:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
280689 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280688 +++$+++ 280688 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.161626340E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  [[User:INVERTED]] was beating me many many times!  +++$+++ :Thanks!  [[User:INVERTED]] was beating me many many times! [[User:Hu|Hu]] 10:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

542833 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-27 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.267319040E09 +++$+++ Best, ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ Best, ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 17:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
542834 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542833 +++$+++ 542833 +++$+++ 2010-02-28 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.267383480E09 +++$+++ Answered on your talk page ([[User_talk:TodorBozhinov#Comments_welcome_on_Commons]]). -- +++$+++ :Answered on your talk page ([[User_talk:TodorBozhinov#Comments_welcome_on_Commons]]). --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 10:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

527379 +++$+++ Xyrael +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527379 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-03 09:25:00 +++$+++ 1.149351900E09 +++$+++ They say that impersonation is the highest form of flattery! I'm currently trying to add your way of displaying the date to my signature, as I think it looks really good and saves space. However, I am having difficulty doing so. Since you can't have modifications to the date in your preferences, it seems to me that you must be printing your signature using this: <nowiki>~~~\/<em style=\"font-size:10px;\">~~~~~<\/em><\/nowiki> every time, which produces <span style=\"text-decoration: none;\">[[User:Xyrael|<font color=\"#696969\">Xyra<\/font>]][[User:Xyrael\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]][[User:Xyrael|<font color=\"#696969\">l<\/font>]] [[User_talk:Xyrael|<sup>T<\/sup>]]<\/span>\/<em style=\"font-size:10px;\">09:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)<\/em> with my current sig. Am I correct? It just seems like a very awkward way round it. Thanks for your help. --<span style=\"text-decoration: none;\">[[User:Xyrael|<font color=\"#696969\">Xyra<\/font>]][[User:Xyrael\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ They say that impersonation is the highest form of flattery! I'm currently trying to add your way of displaying the date to my signature, as I think it looks really good and saves space. However, I am having difficulty doing so. Since you can't have modifications to the date in your preferences, it seems to me that you must be printing your signature using this: <nowiki>~~~/<em style="font-size:10px;">~~~~~</em></nowiki> every time, which produces <span style="text-decoration: none;">[[User:Xyrael|<font color="#696969">Xyra</font>]][[User:Xyrael/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Xyrael|<font color="#696969">l</font>]] [[User_talk:Xyrael|<sup>T</sup>]]</span>/<em style="font-size:10px;">09:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)</em> with my current sig. Am I correct? It just seems like a very awkward way round it. Thanks for your help. --<span style="text-decoration: none;">[[User:Xyrael|<font color="#696969">Xyra</font>]][[User:Xyrael/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Xyrael|<font color="#696969">l</font>]] [[User_talk:Xyrael|<sup>T</sup>]]</span> 09:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
527380 +++$+++ Misza13 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527379 +++$+++ 527379 +++$+++ 2006-06-03 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.149362340E09 +++$+++ Hi there! I just noticed you reply to Xyrael, where you said you use '''<nowiki>{{subst:User:^demon\/sig}}<\/nowiki>''' to sign your posts. A minor tip to perhaps make your life easier: put that text in the \"Nickname\" field in [[Special:Preferences]], '''check''' \"Raw signature\" and save. Signing will then become as easy as putting '''3''' tildes: '''<nowiki>~~~<\/nowiki>'''. Happy editing!  +++$+++ :Hi there! I just noticed you reply to Xyrael, where you said you use '''<nowiki>{{subst:User:^demon/sig}}</nowiki>''' to sign your posts. A minor tip to perhaps make your life easier: put that text in the "Nickname" field in [[Special:Preferences]], '''check''' "Raw signature" and save. Signing will then become as easy as putting '''3''' tildes: '''<nowiki>~~~</nowiki>'''. Happy editing! [[User:Misza13|Misza]][[WP:ESP|<span style="color:green">'''13'''</span>]] <sup><u>'''[[User talk:Misza13|T]] [[Special:Contributions/Misza13|C]]'''</u></sup> 12:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
527381 +++$+++ Xyrael +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527379 +++$+++ 527380 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.149531660E09 +++$+++ If you're interested, ^demon, this discusison is continuing on Misza13's talkpage, where I've discovered a really cool method, and I'm trying to work out the best way of getting round it in VandalProof, as this could cause difficulties. Thanks for all the help that you've given. --<span style=\"text-decoration: none;\">[[User:Xyrael|<font color=\"#696969\">Xyra<\/font>]][[User:Xyrael\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::If you're interested, ^demon, this discusison is continuing on Misza13's talkpage, where I've discovered a really cool method, and I'm trying to work out the best way of getting round it in VandalProof, as this could cause difficulties. Thanks for all the help that you've given. --<span style="text-decoration: none;">[[User:Xyrael|<font color="#696969">Xyra</font>]][[User:Xyrael/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Xyrael|<font color="#696969">l</font>]] [[User_talk:Xyrael|<sup>T</sup>]]</span> 11:21, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
527382 +++$+++ Xyrael +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527379 +++$+++ 527381 +++$+++ 2006-06-19 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.150779420E09 +++$+++ I've got mine working at last, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Xyrael\/Sig&oldid=59513753 here], but I'm not using it at the moment due to VandalProof not being as accomodating as I'd like. Thanks for all your help in getting there. &mdash;[[User:Xyrael|Xyra]][[User:Xyrael\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::I've got mine working at last, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Xyrael/Sig&oldid=59513753 here], but I'm not using it at the moment due to VandalProof not being as accomodating as I'd like. Thanks for all your help in getting there. &mdash;[[User:Xyrael|Xyra]][[User:Xyrael/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Xyrael|l]] 21:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

280692 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-24 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.161684540E09 +++$+++ Please review subsequent edits and offer constructive improvement suggestions. --  +++$+++ Please review subsequent edits and offer constructive improvement suggestions. -- [[User:RJBurkhart3]] 03:09, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
280693 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280692 +++$+++ 280692 +++$+++ 2006-10-24 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.161686100E09 +++$+++ I've reviewed it and nothing and none of the changes makes her notable.  There are millions of programmers.  Furthermore, what part of [[User talk:RJBurkhart3#Summarize, Group, Preview !|Summarize Group, Preview]] don't you understand?  +++$+++ : I've reviewed it and nothing and none of the changes makes her notable.  There are millions of programmers.  Furthermore, what part of [[User talk:RJBurkhart3#Summarize, Group, Preview !|Summarize Group, Preview]] don't you understand? [[User:Hu|Hu]] 03:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

542839 +++$+++ IngerAlHaosului +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-02 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.278091200E09 +++$+++ I am trying to create a script that will check if the items in the watch list still exist and if they don't remove them from the watch list, to clean up the deleted pages.But i don't know how to check using js.-- +++$+++ I am trying to create a script that will check if the items in the watch list still exist and if they don't remove them from the watch list, to clean up the deleted pages.But i don't know how to check using js.--[[User:IngerAlHaosului|IngerAlHaosului]] ([[User talk:IngerAlHaosului|talk]]) 10:20, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
542840 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542839 +++$+++ 542839 +++$+++ 2010-07-02 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.278120540E09 +++$+++ Sorry I have no idea how to do that. The fastes way I can think of is to go to http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Watchlist\/edit and mark all the red links. If you have 10,000 on your watch list that is ofcourse a slow way :-) -- +++$+++ :Sorry I have no idea how to do that. The fastes way I can think of is to go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Watchlist/edit and mark all the red links. If you have 10,000 on your watch list that is ofcourse a slow way :-) --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 18:29, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

280696 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280696 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-26 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.161918180E09 +++$+++ Hi - thanks for your note.  I agree, looking at that talk page, that I posted a few too many, however, judging by that, I think it must have been one of the times that I was reverting every edit I saw with [[WP:VP2]] this evening.  With VP2, I have been dispensing with using [[WP:AIV]] for the majority of cases, instead asking an admin to do the blocking using IRC.  Thanks again, <strong>[[User:Martinp23|M]] +++$+++ Hi - thanks for your note.  I agree, looking at that talk page, that I posted a few too many, however, judging by that, I think it must have been one of the times that I was reverting every edit I saw with [[WP:VP2]] this evening.  With VP2, I have been dispensing with using [[WP:AIV]] for the majority of cases, instead asking an admin to do the blocking using IRC.  Thanks again, <strong>[[User:Martinp23|M]][[User:Martinp23/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User_talk:Martinp23|rtinp23]]</strong> 20:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
280697 +++$+++ Martinp23 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280696 +++$+++ 280696 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.161918780E09 +++$+++ Also, I'll be careful, in future, just to rollback without warnings after reporting the user :) <strong>[[User:Martinp23|M]] +++$+++ :Also, I'll be careful, in future, just to rollback without warnings after reporting the user :) <strong>[[User:Martinp23|M]][[User:Martinp23/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User_talk:Martinp23|rtinp23]]</strong> 20:13, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
280698 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280696 +++$+++ 280696 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.161918840E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ : Thanks. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 20:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
280699 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280696 +++$+++ 280696 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.161935220E09 +++$+++ There are no other reversions I made to the [[Neuron]] page.  +++$+++ : There are no other reversions I made to the [[Neuron]] page. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 00:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
280700 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280696 +++$+++ 280699 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.161942300E09 +++$+++ I think it was the llamas one; that looks like a valuable contribution.  Hu, you should be ashamed of yourself for deleting such critically important material from [[Neuron]].  '''141.156.143.20''' certainly taught you a lesson. --  +++$+++ ::I think it was the llamas one; that looks like a valuable contribution.  Hu, you should be ashamed of yourself for deleting such critically important material from [[Neuron]].  '''141.156.143.20''' certainly taught you a lesson. -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 02:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

542842 +++$+++ NativeForeigner +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542842 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-03 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.278153780E09 +++$+++ What is the purpose of the nowcommons script, and which pages should it be used on in the process of transferring files? It might speed up my work ;) '' +++$+++ What is the purpose of the nowcommons script, and which pages should it be used on in the process of transferring files? It might speed up my work ;) ''[[User:NativeForeigner|NativeForeigner]]'' <sup>[[User talk:NativeForeigner|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/NativeForeigner|Contribs]]</sub> 03:43, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
542843 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542842 +++$+++ 542842 +++$+++ 2010-07-03 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.278210240E09 +++$+++ How do you transfer images? And how many? I use a bot so if you have a \"long list\" I might be able to help you. -- +++$+++ :How do you transfer images? And how many? I use a bot so if you have a "long list" I might be able to help you. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 19:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

18555 +++$+++ JPG-GR +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18555 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-27 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.222503180E09 +++$+++ If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at [[WT:RM|Wikipedia talk:Requested moves]] or contact me on my talk page. -  +++$+++ If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at [[WT:RM|Wikipedia talk:Requested moves]] or contact me on my talk page. - [[User:JPG-GR|JPG-GR]] ([[User talk:JPG-GR|talk]]) 01:13, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
18556 +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18555 +++$+++ 18555 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.222510320E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I'm sorry about that.  It's done now. -  +++$+++ :Thanks.  I'm sorry about that.  It's done now. - [[User:NYArtsnWords|NYArtsnWords]] ([[User talk:NYArtsnWords#top|talk]]) 03:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

542844 +++$+++ IngerAlHaosului +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542844 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-04 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.278250740E09 +++$+++ I was thinking how about if we make a review system for MTC this way a user can review a file and if it qualifiers then it gets added to a list and a bot can uploaded it, what do you think?-- +++$+++ I was thinking how about if we make a review system for MTC this way a user can review a file and if it qualifiers then it gets added to a list and a bot can uploaded it, what do you think?--[[User:IngerAlHaosului|IngerAlHaosului]] ([[User talk:IngerAlHaosului|talk]]) 06:39, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
542845 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542844 +++$+++ 542844 +++$+++ 2010-07-04 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.278263340E09 +++$+++ That sounds good. I think something like that has been tried before - see [[:Category:Images ready to be moved by John Bot II]]. I do not know excactly what went wrong but we should try not to make the same mistake. At the moment Multichill and I have a plan to do a mass transfer. The plan is to start with the images in [[:Category:User-created public domain images]]. First step was to sort it in categories for each month. Next step is to do the transfer. Multichill wrote a pywikipedia script just for this task. -- +++$+++ :That sounds good. I think something like that has been tried before - see [[:Category:Images ready to be moved by John Bot II]]. I do not know excactly what went wrong but we should try not to make the same mistake. At the moment Multichill and I have a plan to do a mass transfer. The plan is to start with the images in [[:Category:User-created public domain images]]. First step was to sort it in categories for each month. Next step is to do the transfer. Multichill wrote a pywikipedia script just for this task. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 10:09, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
542846 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542844 +++$+++ 542845 +++$+++ 2010-07-04 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.278265200E09 +++$+++ We have a review system for \"NowCommons\". The system for \"ToCommons\" could be the same. Once a \"reviewer=Some trusted user\" is added then the image ends up in a category for this user or perhaps do it with a switch of all reviewers. If the reviewer is list --> \"Category:Files reviewed by trusted user\" and if not in list --> \"Category:Files reviewed by other users\". The script to review NowCommons could be modified for ToCommons so it is possible to review the image with one click or fail it and add a reason. -- +++$+++ ::We have a review system for "NowCommons". The system for "ToCommons" could be the same. Once a "reviewer=Some trusted user" is added then the image ends up in a category for this user or perhaps do it with a switch of all reviewers. If the reviewer is list --> "Category:Files reviewed by trusted user" and if not in list --> "Category:Files reviewed by other users". The script to review NowCommons could be modified for ToCommons so it is possible to review the image with one click or fail it and add a reason. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 10:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

280702 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.161976140E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 12:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
280703 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280702 +++$+++ 280702 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.161977760E09 +++$+++ Somehow the info got obliterated during the upload, but in any case I have explained that I made the screenshot so I own the copyright and I have shown the site the screenshot is documenting for the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Learning magic]] debate, which is fair use.  +++$+++ * Somehow the info got obliterated during the upload, but in any case I have explained that I made the screenshot so I own the copyright and I have shown the site the screenshot is documenting for the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning magic]] debate, which is fair use. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 12:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

280704 +++$+++ Srose +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.161992040E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've just noticed that you recently left a templated userpage message. I'm just bringing to your attention that the format and context of these templates will be shortly changing. It is recommended that you visit [[WP:UW|WikiProject user warnings]] and harmonisation discussion [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_user_warnings\/templates|pages]] to find out how these changes could affect the templates you use. We also would appreciate any insights or thoughts you may have on the subject. Thanks for your understanding. Best regards!  +++$+++ Hi, I've just noticed that you recently left a templated userpage message. I'm just bringing to your attention that the format and context of these templates will be shortly changing. It is recommended that you visit [[WP:UW|WikiProject user warnings]] and harmonisation discussion [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_user_warnings/templates|pages]] to find out how these changes could affect the templates you use. We also would appreciate any insights or thoughts you may have on the subject. Thanks for your understanding. Best regards! [[User:Srose|<b><font color="green">S<i>rose</i></font></b>]] [[User talk:Srose|<font color="hotpink">(<b>talk</b>)</font>]] 16:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
280705 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280704 +++$+++ 280704 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.162082580E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I looked and made a comment there.  I may make some more soon.  +++$+++ : Thanks.  I looked and made a comment there.  I may make some more soon. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 17:43, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

18561 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-29 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.288350420E09 +++$+++ I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption.  +++$+++ I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 04:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
18562 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ NYArtsnWords +++$+++ 18561 +++$+++ 18561 +++$+++ 2010-12-08 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.291859760E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  17:56, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

542850 +++$+++ Pilif12p +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542850 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-06 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.278468960E09 +++$+++ {{adminshirt}} congrats! <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;background:#FFFF00;\"> +++$+++ {{adminshirt}} congrats! <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;background:#FFFF00;">[[User:Pilif12p|<b>Pilif12p</b>]] : [[User_talk:Pilif12p|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000FF;">&nbsp;Yo&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 19:16, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
542851 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542850 +++$+++ 542850 +++$+++ 2010-07-06 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.278469320E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot! Now I have a cool T-shirt. LOL! -- +++$+++ : Thanks a lot! Now I have a cool T-shirt. LOL! --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 19:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
542852 +++$+++ Kanonkas +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542850 +++$+++ 542851 +++$+++ 2010-07-08 07:37:00 +++$+++ 1.278599820E09 +++$+++ A little late to the party. Congratulations indeed. --<small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::A little late to the party. Congratulations indeed. --<small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Kanonkas|<b>Kanonkas</b>]] : [[User talk:Kanonkas|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 07:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
542853 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542850 +++$+++ 542852 +++$+++ 2010-07-09 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.278669900E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! I  knew your AfD  would pass in  spite of my  oppose - I'm sure you  realised that  my  oppose was against  Wikipdia policy and previous experience with  that  policy. It expressed no  doubts whatsoever about you personally being a good sysop ,  and I'm  sure you  will. Good luck, and I  hope to be seeing  you  around.-- +++$+++ :::Congratulations! I  knew your AfD  would pass in  spite of my  oppose - I'm sure you  realised that  my  oppose was against  Wikipdia policy and previous experience with  that  policy. It expressed no  doubts whatsoever about you personally being a good sysop ,  and I'm  sure you  will. Good luck, and I  hope to be seeing  you  around.--[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 03:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
542854 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542850 +++$+++ 542853 +++$+++ 2010-07-09 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.278688740E09 +++$+++ Thank you both. Yes I realise that thes \"special\" RfA was the reason for the opposes and doubt. -- +++$+++ ::::Thank you both. Yes I realise that thes "special" RfA was the reason for the opposes and doubt. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 08:19, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
542855 +++$+++  +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542850 +++$+++ 542854 +++$+++ 2010-07-14 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.279107240E09 +++$+++ @Kudpung: I smiled when you abbreviated his RfA \"AfD\" {{=)|}}. And a belated congrats to you, MGA73!  +++$+++ :::::@Kudpung: I smiled when you abbreviated his RfA "AfD" {{=)|}}. And a belated congrats to you, MGA73! [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] <sup>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Airplaneman|<span style="color:gold;size=2">Review?</span>]]</sup> 04:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

280707 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-29 09:25:00 +++$+++ 1.162142700E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the support.  +++$+++ Thank you for the support. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 09:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
280708 +++$+++ Vercalos +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280707 +++$+++ 280707 +++$+++ 2006-10-29 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.162143000E09 +++$+++ And he seems to be inactive since you warned him.  That's a relief.-- +++$+++ :And he seems to be inactive since you warned him.  That's a relief.--[[User:Vercalos|Vercalos]] 09:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

18566 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-18 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.287450540E09 +++$+++ I would like to finalize the bot tasks for WikiProject Films for submission; the tasks so far are listed [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films\/Bot requests|here]]. Are any of them problematic to accomplish? Do any of them need to be more specific on a technical level? I'd like to push for the bot request to be made since discussion appears to have tapered off.  +++$+++ I would like to finalize the bot tasks for WikiProject Films for submission; the tasks so far are listed [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Bot requests|here]]. Are any of them problematic to accomplish? Do any of them need to be more specific on a technical level? I'd like to push for the bot request to be made since discussion appears to have tapered off. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 18:09, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
18567 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18566 +++$+++ 18566 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.287629160E09 +++$+++ The task list has been [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Films%2FBot_requests&action=historysubmit&diff=391881298&oldid=391483707 updated] since my previous message. Please let me know if any of the tasks cannot be done by a bot.  +++$+++ :The task list has been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Films%2FBot_requests&action=historysubmit&diff=391881298&oldid=391483707 updated] since my previous message. Please let me know if any of the tasks cannot be done by a bot. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 19:46, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

18568 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.309981260E09 +++$+++ Hi, Kollision. It appears that {{user|Peppage}} has been inactive since last May. What should we do with the bot tasks? They're still listed at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Film\/Bot requests]].  +++$+++ Hi, Kollision. It appears that {{user|Peppage}} has been inactive since last May. What should we do with the bot tasks? They're still listed at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Bot requests]]. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 12:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
18569 +++$+++ Erik +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18568 +++$+++ 18568 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.310168460E09 +++$+++ If Peppage does not respond, what do you recommend for the next step to be? We had a lot of good ideas for bot tasks, and I'd hate for them to go to waste.  +++$+++ :If Peppage does not respond, what do you recommend for the next step to be? We had a lot of good ideas for bot tasks, and I'd hate for them to go to waste. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 16:41, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
18570 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18568 +++$+++ 18569 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.310205060E09 +++$+++ The next step would be to create a request at [[Wikipedia:Bot requests]]. In the request point to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Film\/Bot requests]] and [https:\/\/bitbucket.org\/peppage\/filmbot\/src the source code for Peppage's bot] and ask if someone would be willing to take over writing the bot. -  +++$+++ ::The next step would be to create a request at [[Wikipedia:Bot requests]]. In the request point to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Bot requests]] and [https://bitbucket.org/peppage/filmbot/src the source code for Peppage's bot] and ask if someone would be willing to take over writing the bot. - [[User:Kollision|Kollision]] ([[User talk:Kollision#top|talk]]) 02:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

280714 +++$+++ Moez +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-30 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.162259160E09 +++$+++ Hey there, thanks for the appreciation ;)  +++$+++ Hey there, thanks for the appreciation ;) [[User:Moez| Moez]] <sup>[[user talk:Moez|''talk'']]</sup> 17:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
280715 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280714 +++$+++ 280714 +++$+++ 2006-11-01 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.162396980E09 +++$+++ The writing in question, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:California&diff=84778955&oldid=84768499], was reverted by a third user, so someone else considered it vandalism too.  By the way, sign your posts on Talk pages with four tildes <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>.  +++$+++ : The writing in question, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:California&diff=84778955&oldid=84768499], was reverted by a third user, so someone else considered it vandalism too.  By the way, sign your posts on Talk pages with four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 08:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

18571 +++$+++ Nehrams2020 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-01 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.288597560E09 +++$+++ The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Film\/Outreach\/October 2010 Newsletter|Octoberr 2010 issue]]''' of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing!  +++$+++ The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Outreach/October 2010 Newsletter|Octoberr 2010 issue]]''' of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! [[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nehrams2020|contrib]]) 00:46, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
18572 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18571 +++$+++ 18571 +++$+++ 2010-10-22 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.287754800E09 +++$+++ It would be great if you create animations for other techniques in [[:en:Category:Cinematography|Category:Cinematography]] as well. -  +++$+++ :It would be great if you create animations for other techniques in [[:en:Category:Cinematography|Category:Cinematography]] as well. - [[User:Kollision|Kollision]] ([[User talk:Kollision|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 06:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
18573 +++$+++ GDallimore +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18571 +++$+++ 18572 +++$+++ 2010-10-22 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.287778020E09 +++$+++ As for other types of shot, any particular suggestions? I can't see anything obvious in that category, I'm afraid. One that springs to my mind is where there's a narrow depth of field and the focal point shifts between two objects\/people in an otherwise static scene to change the \"focus\" of the viewer. But I don't know what that's called or even if there's an article on it.  +++$+++ ::As for other types of shot, any particular suggestions? I can't see anything obvious in that category, I'm afraid. One that springs to my mind is where there's a narrow depth of field and the focal point shifts between two objects/people in an otherwise static scene to change the "focus" of the viewer. But I don't know what that's called or even if there's an article on it. [[User:GDallimore|GDallimore]] ([[User talk:GDallimore|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 13:07, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
18574 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18571 +++$+++ 18573 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 08:48:00 +++$+++ 1.288540080E09 +++$+++ I think what you're describing is [[:en:Racking focus|racking focus]] (doesn't have any illustrations yet). Other articles that could use an animation are [[:en:Tilt (cinematography)|tilt]], [[:en:Tracking shot|tracking shot]], [[:en:Whip pan|whip pan]] and [[:en:Panning (camera)|panning]]. -  +++$+++ :::I think what you're describing is [[:en:Racking focus|racking focus]] (doesn't have any illustrations yet). Other articles that could use an animation are [[:en:Tilt (cinematography)|tilt]], [[:en:Tracking shot|tracking shot]], [[:en:Whip pan|whip pan]] and [[:en:Panning (camera)|panning]]. - [[User:Kollision|Kollision]] ([[User talk:Kollision|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 08:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
18575 +++$+++ GDallimore +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18571 +++$+++ 18574 +++$+++ 2010-11-04 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.288857300E09 +++$+++ I'll be in touch. Thanks for the support!  +++$+++ ::::I'll be in touch. Thanks for the support! [[User:GDallimore|GDallimore]] ([[User talk:GDallimore|Talk]]) 00:55, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
18576 +++$+++ GDallimore +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18571 +++$+++ 18571 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.288950000E09 +++$+++ Here we go. The lighting states need a bit of fiddling - fill light should be softer and rim light needs to light more of the top of the head. Other than that, any thoughts?  +++$+++ :Here we go. The lighting states need a bit of fiddling - fill light should be softer and rim light needs to light more of the top of the head. Other than that, any thoughts? [[User:GDallimore|GDallimore]] ([[User talk:GDallimore|Talk]]) 02:40, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
18577 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18571 +++$+++ 18576 +++$+++ 2010-11-08 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.289221680E09 +++$+++ Regarding your [[:File:3-point lighting.ogv|newer video]], it looks good. Not sure if it would be better, but maybe you try just \"switching on\/off\" the lights rather than fading in and out. And I think the second half of the video where all three lights are used needs to go a little bit slower. Other than that, good work.-  +++$+++ ::Regarding your [[:File:3-point lighting.ogv|newer video]], it looks good. Not sure if it would be better, but maybe you try just "switching on/off" the lights rather than fading in and out. And I think the second half of the video where all three lights are used needs to go a little bit slower. Other than that, good work.- [[User:Kollision|Kollision]] ([[User talk:Kollision#top|talk]]) 05:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

542860 +++$+++ Polymathsj +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-12 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.278993660E09 +++$+++ Hello? Whom do I speak to to become a [[rollbacker]]?  +++$+++ Hello? Whom do I speak to to become a [[rollbacker]]? [[User:Polymathsj|<font color="blue">PolymathSJ</font>]] [[User talk:Polymathsj|<font color="lime">talk</font>]] 21:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
542861 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542860 +++$+++ 542860 +++$+++ 2010-07-12 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.278994500E09 +++$+++ Hi PolymathSJ, You can find more help here [[Wikipedia:Rollback_feature#How_to_apply]]. However, I think that 19 edits is a little to few to give someone this tool. Perhaps you could work some more and ask again later? Enjoy and thank you for helping! -- +++$+++ :Hi PolymathSJ, You can find more help here [[Wikipedia:Rollback_feature#How_to_apply]]. However, I think that 19 edits is a little to few to give someone this tool. Perhaps you could work some more and ask again later? Enjoy and thank you for helping! --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 21:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

542862 +++$+++ Polymathsj +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542862 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-12 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.278994800E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I agree. About how much would you suggest? ''' +++$+++ Thanks. I agree. About how much would you suggest? '''[[User:Polymathsj|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:black; padding:1px;background:blue"><font color="lime">&nbsp;Polymath<font color="white">sj</font></font></span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Polymathsj|&nbsp;(Talk)]]</sup> 21:20, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
542863 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542862 +++$+++ 542862 +++$+++ 2010-07-12 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.278995160E09 +++$+++ It is not just the number of edits but at least a few hundreds. But the admins in [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to grant rollback requests]] are better judges than I :-) -- +++$+++ :It is not just the number of edits but at least a few hundreds. But the admins in [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to grant rollback requests]] are better judges than I :-) --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 21:26, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

487451 +++$+++ Hildanknight +++$+++ Saxifrage +++$+++ 487451 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 09:01:00 +++$+++ 1.161964860E09 +++$+++ Saxifrage, if you accept this RFA, I will support you. You may have botched up a move, but you did help me with the creation of [[Wikipedia:Requests for feedback|Requests for feedback]], and for some time, you helped respond to feedback requests there. Please continue to respond to feedback requests - RFF is getting backlogged. -- +++$+++ Saxifrage, if you accept this RFA, I will support you. You may have botched up a move, but you did help me with the creation of [[Wikipedia:Requests for feedback|Requests for feedback]], and for some time, you helped respond to feedback requests there. Please continue to respond to feedback requests - RFF is getting backlogged. --[[User:Hildanknight|J.L.W.S. The Special One]] 09:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
487452 +++$+++ Saxifrage +++$+++ Saxifrage +++$+++ 487451 +++$+++ 487451 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.161991560E09 +++$+++ That's definitely not conditional on your support though. :) &mdash;  +++$+++ :That's definitely not conditional on your support though. :) &mdash; [[User:Saxifrage|Saxifrage]] [[User talk:Saxifrage|✎]] 16:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
487453 +++$+++ Hildanknight +++$+++ Saxifrage +++$+++ 487451 +++$+++ 487452 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.162045920E09 +++$+++ What RFF needs is at least 5 experienced Wikipedians who are familiar with policy and friendly to newcomers, to respond to requests promptly. -- +++$+++ ::What RFF needs is at least 5 experienced Wikipedians who are familiar with policy and friendly to newcomers, to respond to requests promptly. --[[User:Hildanknight|J.L.W.S. The Special One]] 07:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
487454 +++$+++ Saxifrage +++$+++ Saxifrage +++$+++ 487451 +++$+++ 487453 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.162081440E09 +++$+++ Anyway, that's enough rambling musings, so I'll leave it at that. \u2014  +++$+++ :::Anyway, that's enough rambling musings, so I'll leave it at that. — [[User:Saxifrage|Saxifrage]] [[User talk:Saxifrage|✎]] 17:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
487455 +++$+++ Hildanknight +++$+++ Saxifrage +++$+++ 487451 +++$+++ 487454 +++$+++ 2006-10-29 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.162125420E09 +++$+++ I understand and appreciate that you prefer to fix things yourself instead of offering advice. However, please remember that besides improving articles, RFF is about helping newcomers improve. When fixing problems with an article, point out these problems to the newcomer. This is giving feedback to help them improve. -- +++$+++ ::::I understand and appreciate that you prefer to fix things yourself instead of offering advice. However, please remember that besides improving articles, RFF is about helping newcomers improve. When fixing problems with an article, point out these problems to the newcomer. This is giving feedback to help them improve. --[[User:Hildanknight|J.L.W.S. The Special One]] 04:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

18578 +++$+++ Ring Cinema +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-09 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.289348940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for working on the article. I wanted to question you about referring to it as a 'movie'. Seems to me it's a movie. What's your thinking? -- +++$+++ Thanks for working on the article. I wanted to question you about referring to it as a 'movie'. Seems to me it's a movie. What's your thinking? --[[User:Ring Cinema|Ring Cinema]] ([[User talk:Ring Cinema|talk]]) 16:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
18579 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18578 +++$+++ 18578 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.289376960E09 +++$+++ I'm guessing you're referring to the instances where I changed the word \"movie\" to \"film\" in the article. A [[film]] is the same thing as a movie, on Wikipedia we mainly use \"film\" because it is [[WP:TONE|more professional]]. -  +++$+++ :I'm guessing you're referring to the instances where I changed the word "movie" to "film" in the article. A [[film]] is the same thing as a movie, on Wikipedia we mainly use "film" because it is [[WP:TONE|more professional]]. - [[User:Kollision|Kollision]] ([[User talk:Kollision#top|talk]]) 00:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
18580 +++$+++ Ring Cinema +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18578 +++$+++ 18579 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.289428980E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure I completely agree. To me, a professional approach uses synonyms to give the article greater readability. -- +++$+++ ::I'm not sure I completely agree. To me, a professional approach uses synonyms to give the article greater readability. --[[User:Ring Cinema|Ring Cinema]] ([[User talk:Ring Cinema|talk]]) 14:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
18581 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18578 +++$+++ 18580 +++$+++ 2010-12-09 10:25:00 +++$+++ 1.291919100E09 +++$+++ I don't get you. What makes ''The Edge of Heaven'' a \"movie\" instead of a \"film\"? Why are you only changing this article to use \"movie\" while leaving others as \"film\". What makes ''The Edge of Heaven'' special? -  +++$+++ :::I don't get you. What makes ''The Edge of Heaven'' a "movie" instead of a "film"? Why are you only changing this article to use "movie" while leaving others as "film". What makes ''The Edge of Heaven'' special? - [[User:Kollision|Kollision]] ([[User talk:Kollision#top|talk]]) 10:25, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

542868 +++$+++ KuwarOnline +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542868 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-02 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.280781180E09 +++$+++ Hi, I came to know that the image [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:Airport express 2.jpg Airport Express 2] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:Airport_express.jpg Airport Express] is not own work which is claimed by [[User_talk:Aranjan17]], This file copyright belongs to user [http:\/\/www.skyscrapercity.com\/member.php?u=454888 Indian Rockstar] on scyscraper blog. see http:\/\/www.skyscrapercity.com\/showthread.php?t=516812&page=265. Please leave talkback on my talkpage.  +++$+++ Hi, I came to know that the image [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Airport express 2.jpg Airport Express 2] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Airport_express.jpg Airport Express] is not own work which is claimed by [[User_talk:Aranjan17]], This file copyright belongs to user [http://www.skyscrapercity.com/member.php?u=454888 Indian Rockstar] on scyscraper blog. see http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=516812&page=265. Please leave talkback on my talkpage. [[User:KuwarOnline|<b><font color="#007FAA">KuwarOnline</font></b>]]''' <b><sup>[[User talk:KuwarOnline|<font color="#AA22CC">'''Talk'''</font>]]</sup></b> 13:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
542869 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542868 +++$+++ 542868 +++$+++ 2010-08-02 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.280807040E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I [[User_talk:Aranjan17#Images_uploaded_as_own_work|asked the uploader]] how that can be. If we get no good answer fast we should delete. -- +++$+++ :Thank you. I [[User_talk:Aranjan17#Images_uploaded_as_own_work|asked the uploader]] how that can be. If we get no good answer fast we should delete. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 20:44, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
542870 +++$+++ KuwarOnline +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542868 +++$+++ 542869 +++$+++ 2010-08-03 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.280840940E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I already asked [http:\/\/www.skyscrapercity.com\/member.php?u=454888 Indian Rockstar], If he is ready to release under any free licenses, I m active user of http:\/\/www.skyscrapercity.com. waiting for his email.  +++$+++ ::Thanks, I already asked [http://www.skyscrapercity.com/member.php?u=454888 Indian Rockstar], If he is ready to release under any free licenses, I m active user of http://www.skyscrapercity.com. waiting for his email. [[User:KuwarOnline|<b><font color="#007FAA">KuwarOnline</font></b>]]''' <b><sup>[[User talk:KuwarOnline|<font color="#AA22CC">'''Talk'''</font>]]</sup></b> 06:09, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
542871 +++$+++ KuwarOnline +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542868 +++$+++ 542869 +++$+++ 2010-08-11 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.281528600E09 +++$+++ I dont think so Indian Rockstar is going release under any free licenses. He is not replying to messages\/email.  +++$+++ ::I dont think so Indian Rockstar is going release under any free licenses. He is not replying to messages/email. [[User:KuwarOnline|<b><font color="#007FAA">KuwarOnline</font></b>]]''' <b><sup>[[User talk:KuwarOnline|<font color="#AA22CC">'''Talk'''</font>]]</sup></b> 05:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
542872 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542868 +++$+++ 542871 +++$+++ 2010-08-11 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.281542880E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I have now nominated the files for deletion here [[:commons:Commons:Deletion requests\/File:Airport express.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :::Thank you. I have now nominated the files for deletion here [[:commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Airport express.jpg]]. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 09:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

18583 +++$+++ Ambrose.hogan +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-17 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.292623320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ambrose.hogan|Depth Charge]] ([[User talk:Ambrose.hogan|talk]]) 14:02, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
18584 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18583 +++$+++ 18583 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.292692200E09 +++$+++ Thank ''you'' for understanding. -  +++$+++ :Thank ''you'' for understanding. - [[User:Kollision|Kollision]] ([[User talk:Kollision#top|talk]]) 09:10, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

506903 +++$+++ JWJW +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-28 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.185626400E09 +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made&#32;to [[:Tallwood High School]]: You may already know about them, but you might find [[Wikipedia:Template messages\/User talk namespace]] useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the [[Wikipedia:sandbox|sandbox]]. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-warn --> [[User:JWJW|JWJW]] <sup>[[User Talk:JWJW|Talk]]<\/sup> Long Live  +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made&#32;to [[:Tallwood High School]]: You may already know about them, but you might find [[Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace]] useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the [[Wikipedia:sandbox|sandbox]]. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-warn --> [[User:JWJW|JWJW]] <sup>[[User Talk:JWJW|Talk]]</sup> Long Live [[User:JWJW/Esperanza|<span style="color:#00FF00;">E</span>]]speranza! :) 05:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
506904 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506903 +++$+++ 506903 +++$+++ 2007-07-28 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.185626640E09 +++$+++ You certainly seem to find them useful. -- +++$+++ :You certainly seem to find them useful. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] 05:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

18585 +++$+++ Sayerslle +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-24 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.293254400E09 +++$+++ Why did you remove Pauline Kael's remarks on deschanel's film Crusoe. Wouldn't they fit in the critical reception section o.k?. Whats wrong with her remarks?  +++$+++ Why did you remove Pauline Kael's remarks on deschanel's film Crusoe. Wouldn't they fit in the critical reception section o.k?. Whats wrong with her remarks? [[User:Sayerslle|Sayerslle]] ([[User talk:Sayerslle|talk]]) 21:20, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
18586 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18585 +++$+++ 18585 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.293272400E09 +++$+++ I made the judgement to remove her comments because there were some problems with it. Firstly, there was no attribution in the prose (eg. \"Pauline Kael said\"), it was just a quote dumped in the article. Secondly, it was quite a long quote. And thirdly, the quote was not the best because it flipped frequently between describing the film (which we don't want), describing Deschanel (which we also don't want) and the actually film criticism. However, looking back at it now I can see how these issues can be fixed and have reinstated her comments in edited form. -  +++$+++ :I made the judgement to remove her comments because there were some problems with it. Firstly, there was no attribution in the prose (eg. "Pauline Kael said"), it was just a quote dumped in the article. Secondly, it was quite a long quote. And thirdly, the quote was not the best because it flipped frequently between describing the film (which we don't want), describing Deschanel (which we also don't want) and the actually film criticism. However, looking back at it now I can see how these issues can be fixed and have reinstated her comments in edited form. - [[User:Kollision|Kollision]] ([[User talk:Kollision#top|talk]]) 02:20, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

280730 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-07 07:41:00 +++$+++ 1.162914060E09 +++$+++ The speedy delete was completely justified.  The wording of the page was only negative.  At the very least it failed [[WP:NPOV]].  It didn't include any ordinary biographical information.  I didn't see any source on it, though that might be my oversight, but in any case that wasn't the reason it was deleted.  It was deleted because it met the No Attacks criteria for speedy deletion.   +++$+++ The speedy delete was completely justified.  The wording of the page was only negative.  At the very least it failed [[WP:NPOV]].  It didn't include any ordinary biographical information.  I didn't see any source on it, though that might be my oversight, but in any case that wasn't the reason it was deleted.  It was deleted because it met the No Attacks criteria for speedy deletion.  [[User:Hu|Hu]] 07:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
280731 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.162951860E09 +++$+++ I did not delete it. Get your facts straight. And learn the basics including signing posts on talk pages with four tildes: <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>.  +++$+++ :: I did not delete it. Get your facts straight. And learn the basics including signing posts on talk pages with four tildes: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 18:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
280732 +++$+++ Wbroun +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.162966320E09 +++$+++ Maybe you can enlighten me to the \"facts,\" since you seem so well acquainted with them.  +++$+++ :::Maybe you can enlighten me to the "facts," since you seem so well acquainted with them. [[User:Wbroun|Wbroun]] 22:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
280733 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.162966500E09 +++$+++ You could have found this:  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/delete&page=Nedra_Pickler]  +++$+++ ::: You could have found this:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Nedra_Pickler] [[User:Hu|Hu]] 22:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

18588 +++$+++ TCO +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18588 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.296186960E09 +++$+++ Was not aware that we had a procedure for questioning the articles on talk prior to bringing to FAR.  The short challenge seems more reasonable based on that. (Not 100% sure that is the way to go, just saying much more understandable.  And then that you could write down everything wrong with it.  Definitely makes me support a delist.) +++$+++ Was not aware that we had a procedure for questioning the articles on talk prior to bringing to FAR.  The short challenge seems more reasonable based on that. (Not 100% sure that is the way to go, just saying much more understandable.  And then that you could write down everything wrong with it.  Definitely makes me support a delist.)[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 19:56, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
18589 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18588 +++$+++ 18588 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.296243060E09 +++$+++ No worries. This is my first FAR submission so I wasn't quite sure how much to write. The FAR instructions just says to write \"your reason(s) for nominating the article, specifying the FA criterion\/criteria that are at issue\" and I looked at the other FAR nominations and their opening remarks seemed quite short as well. I should probably have explained why I felt the article failed the comprehensiveness criteria in greater detail though. -  +++$+++ :No worries. This is my first FAR submission so I wasn't quite sure how much to write. The FAR instructions just says to write "your reason(s) for nominating the article, specifying the FA criterion/criteria that are at issue" and I looked at the other FAR nominations and their opening remarks seemed quite short as well. I should probably have explained why I felt the article failed the comprehensiveness criteria in greater detail though. - [[User:Kollision|Kollision]] ([[User talk:Kollision#top|talk]]) 11:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
18590 +++$+++ TCO +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18588 +++$+++ 18589 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.296265440E09 +++$+++ I think it's fine to note that the author is away.  I apologize, I read it like a rationale for why to kill the thing (because the saver is gone! ;-))  Would maybe just do it in a separate para and not make it a rationale for delist but more a discussion of how you've tried to help the article (note the 24DEC outreach) and what you expect to go down in the FAR.  It's a subtle thing and no biggie honest.  Probably the \"veterans\" knew what you meant. +++$+++ ::I think it's fine to note that the author is away.  I apologize, I read it like a rationale for why to kill the thing (because the saver is gone! ;-))  Would maybe just do it in a separate para and not make it a rationale for delist but more a discussion of how you've tried to help the article (note the 24DEC outreach) and what you expect to go down in the FAR.  It's a subtle thing and no biggie honest.  Probably the "veterans" knew what you meant.[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 17:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

527386 +++$+++ Essjay +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-05 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.152093360E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to drop you a courtesy note letting you know I reverted your closing of the False Prophet mediation nomination; the two oppose rule is two opposes ''by Committee Members'', and though I put it in the wrong section, I'm the only Commmittee Member who has noted opposition. The other two opposes are community opinions, which, while appreciated and considered where appropriate, do not count towards the two oppose rule. I didn't want you to think I was overruling you; just want to make sure everything follows our process. <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\">[[User:Essjay|<font color=\"#7b68ee\">'''Essjay'''<\/font>]] <font color=\"#7b68ee\">(<small>[[User talk:Essjay|<font color=\"#7b68ee\">Talk<\/font>]] \u2022  +++$+++ I just wanted to drop you a courtesy note letting you know I reverted your closing of the False Prophet mediation nomination; the two oppose rule is two opposes ''by Committee Members'', and though I put it in the wrong section, I'm the only Commmittee Member who has noted opposition. The other two opposes are community opinions, which, while appreciated and considered where appropriate, do not count towards the two oppose rule. I didn't want you to think I was overruling you; just want to make sure everything follows our process. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Essjay|<font color="#7b68ee">'''Essjay'''</font>]] <font color="#7b68ee">(<small>[[User talk:Essjay|<font color="#7b68ee">Talk</font>]] • [[User:Essjay/Contact|<font color="#7b68ee">Connect</font>]]</small>)</font></span> 02:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
527387 +++$+++ Danflave +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527386 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.152322740E09 +++$+++ Demon - I no longer edit the ''Lost'' Wikipedia page. I do not have an opinion regarding public or private mediation. Thank you  +++$+++ ::Demon - I no longer edit the ''Lost'' Wikipedia page. I do not have an opinion regarding public or private mediation. Thank you [[User:Danflave|Danflave]] 18:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

542878 +++$+++ Michaelwild +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-16 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.281987060E09 +++$+++ Hi. I was not sure at first what licence to use - but I suppose 3.0 is okay. I just didn't want someone to go and put one of the pics on the front cover of a book (not that any are good enough..) without my permission. Would you be able to recommend a template - parameters etc?  +++$+++ Hi. I was not sure at first what licence to use - but I suppose 3.0 is okay. I just didn't want someone to go and put one of the pics on the front cover of a book (not that any are good enough..) without my permission. Would you be able to recommend a template - parameters etc? [[User:Michaelwild|Michaelwild]] ([[User talk:Michaelwild|talk]]) 12:31, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
542879 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542878 +++$+++ 542878 +++$+++ 2010-08-16 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.281987900E09 +++$+++ Made the reply on [[User_talk:Michaelwild#GFDL]]. -- +++$+++ : Made the reply on [[User_talk:Michaelwild#GFDL]]. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 12:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
542880 +++$+++ Michaelwild +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542878 +++$+++ 542879 +++$+++ 2010-08-16 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.281988680E09 +++$+++ Not sure which is easier for you - if I reply here or on my page. Michaelwild is just my wikipedia pseudonym, if someone uses my pictures I would prefer them to use my real name; Purves, M (Michael Purves) would that then be - {{self|author=Purves, M|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0}}? I don't know how to use a bot to change them.  +++$+++ ::Not sure which is easier for you - if I reply here or on my page. Michaelwild is just my wikipedia pseudonym, if someone uses my pictures I would prefer them to use my real name; Purves, M (Michael Purves) would that then be - {{self|author=Purves, M|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0}}? I don't know how to use a bot to change them. [[User:Michaelwild|Michaelwild]] ([[User talk:Michaelwild|talk]]) 12:58, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
542881 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542878 +++$+++ 542880 +++$+++ 2010-08-16 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.282020660E09 +++$+++ I put pages on the watchlist so I should see it if you reply where discussion started. But it is also ok here. Is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File%3A3_Tree_Nymph_pupae.JPG&action=historysubmit&diff=379290519&oldid=375103482] ok? I can do it for all your images. -- +++$+++ :::I put pages on the watchlist so I should see it if you reply where discussion started. But it is also ok here. Is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3A3_Tree_Nymph_pupae.JPG&action=historysubmit&diff=379290519&oldid=375103482] ok? I can do it for all your images. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 21:51, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
542882 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542878 +++$+++ 542881 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.282353420E09 +++$+++ Well I read your message and I'm pretty sure it is ok to change the license on your images. The bot is running now. -- +++$+++ ::::Well I read your message and I'm pretty sure it is ok to change the license on your images. The bot is running now. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 18:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
542883 +++$+++ Michaelwild +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542878 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.282793400E09 +++$+++ Please can you check the photos on [[Bradypodion melanocephalum]] that I just uploaded from another website and see if they are correct. +++$+++ ::::::Please can you check the photos on [[Bradypodion melanocephalum]] that I just uploaded from another website and see if they are correct.[[User:Michaelwild|Michaelwild]] ([[User talk:Michaelwild|talk]]) 20:30, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
542884 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542878 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.282793640E09 +++$+++ Hi again. The \"Noncommercial\" is a bit problematic. If you see {{tl|cc-by-nc-sa-3.0}} it is a speedy deletion template. So we need a permission from uploader to use it to commercial purpose. -- +++$+++ :::::::Hi again. The "Noncommercial" is a bit problematic. If you see {{tl|cc-by-nc-sa-3.0}} it is a speedy deletion template. So we need a permission from uploader to use it to commercial purpose. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 20:34, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

18592 +++$+++ Gimme danger +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-16 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.297888380E09 +++$+++ Fantastic work.  +++$+++ Fantastic work. [[User:Gimme danger|Danger]] ([[User talk:Gimme danger|talk]]) 12:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
18593 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18592 +++$+++ 18592 +++$+++ 2011-02-16 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.297893060E09 +++$+++ Gee thanks. -  +++$+++ :Gee thanks. - [[User:Kollision|Kollision]] ([[User talk:Kollision#top|talk]]) 13:51, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

280740 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280740 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.163593560E09 +++$+++ Wikipedia has matured, but it is only beginning and is far from finished.  Requiring citations is an excellent principle, but I agree that it is sometimes taken to excess and made too fine-grained a requirement.  It is just \"Hu\", not \"Mr. Hu\".  +++$+++ Wikipedia has matured, but it is only beginning and is far from finished.  Requiring citations is an excellent principle, but I agree that it is sometimes taken to excess and made too fine-grained a requirement.  It is just "Hu", not "Mr. Hu". [[User:Hu|Hu]] 04:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
280741 +++$+++ RatSkrew +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280740 +++$+++ 280740 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.163593860E09 +++$+++ Fair enough, Hu. - +++$+++ :Fair enough, Hu. -[[User:RatSkrew|RatSkrew]] 04:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

542885 +++$+++ Látches +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-21 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.282443600E09 +++$+++ Hi, I asked another admin about whats the best vandal fighting tool to use, but they didn't know. I can't use some of them because I couldn't figure them out. I like reverting vandalism but Twinkle takes so much time. Is there a program like vandal fighter that lets you revert vandalism much easier?  +++$+++ Hi, I asked another admin about whats the best vandal fighting tool to use, but they didn't know. I can't use some of them because I couldn't figure them out. I like reverting vandalism but Twinkle takes so much time. Is there a program like vandal fighter that lets you revert vandalism much easier? [[User:Látches|Látches]] ([[User talk:Látches|talk]]) 19:20, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
542886 +++$+++ J.delanoy +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542885 +++$+++ 542885 +++$+++ 2010-08-21 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.282445940E09 +++$+++ I've had a lot of success with [[WP:HG|Huggle]], but you have to have [[WP:ROLLBACK|rollback]] to use it.  +++$+++ :I've had a lot of success with [[WP:HG|Huggle]], but you have to have [[WP:ROLLBACK|rollback]] to use it. [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="green">J'''.'''delanoy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<font color="blue"><sub>adds</sub></font>]] 19:59, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

18598 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18598 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-29 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.304117280E09 +++$+++ Hello Kollision. Just wanted to say thanks for your work on the plot section of the film ''The Fall''. Considering the narrative of the film that plot section is a tough one to cut down and I think you did a good job. Thanks also for adding the pictures of the locations. I have a purely aesthetic suggestion. I think that the pics might look better if the are arranged vertically instead of horizontally. I guess that I am just used to that arrangement in most WikiP articles. I also think that the pics could be a bit bigger if they were vertical. This is just a suggestion and if you prefer them the way they are than that is fine with me. On another note I have found some clips from ''Yo Ho Ho'' at Youtube and it is interesting to see parts of the film that inspired Tarsem. Thanks for your time and cheers.  +++$+++ Hello Kollision. Just wanted to say thanks for your work on the plot section of the film ''The Fall''. Considering the narrative of the film that plot section is a tough one to cut down and I think you did a good job. Thanks also for adding the pictures of the locations. I have a purely aesthetic suggestion. I think that the pics might look better if the are arranged vertically instead of horizontally. I guess that I am just used to that arrangement in most WikiP articles. I also think that the pics could be a bit bigger if they were vertical. This is just a suggestion and if you prefer them the way they are than that is fine with me. On another note I have found some clips from ''Yo Ho Ho'' at Youtube and it is interesting to see parts of the film that inspired Tarsem. Thanks for your time and cheers. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 15:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
18599 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18598 +++$+++ 18598 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.304167860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the feedback. I think the Filming locations list should be converted into prose. That's why I've made the images horizontal, as a way to encourage that. When the list is converted to prose, the current \"height\" of the images would be appropriate for the \"height\" of the text. -  +++$+++ :Thanks for the feedback. I think the Filming locations list should be converted into prose. That's why I've made the images horizontal, as a way to encourage that. When the list is converted to prose, the current "height" of the images would be appropriate for the "height" of the text. - [[User:Kollision|Kollision]] ([[User talk:Kollision#top|talk]]) 05:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
18600 +++$+++ MarnetteD +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18598 +++$+++ 18599 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.304203620E09 +++$+++ That makes sense. Thanks for taking the time to let me know your reasoning. Enjoy the rest of your weekend.  +++$+++ ::That makes sense. Thanks for taking the time to let me know your reasoning. Enjoy the rest of your weekend. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]] | [[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 15:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

280743 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280743 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.163595720E09 +++$+++ That self-reporting is constrained by categories provided, and though one may \"write-in\" other categories, the categorization is embedded in a culture that overwhelmingly does not make distinctions between groups of Chinese to the same degree it makes distinctions between groups of Europeans.  +++$+++ That self-reporting is constrained by categories provided, and though one may "write-in" other categories, the categorization is embedded in a culture that overwhelmingly does not make distinctions between groups of Chinese to the same degree it makes distinctions between groups of Europeans. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 05:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
280744 +++$+++ RatSkrew +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280743 +++$+++ 280743 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.163595840E09 +++$+++ Well, that would be because Chinese people believe themselves to be one, whereas distinctions between Europeans are massive.  Danes and Germans may look similar, but their behavior in World War II was on opposite ends of the spectrum. - +++$+++ :Well, that would be because Chinese people believe themselves to be one, whereas distinctions between Europeans are massive.  Danes and Germans may look similar, but their behavior in World War II was on opposite ends of the spectrum. -[[User:RatSkrew|RatSkrew]] 05:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
280745 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280743 +++$+++ 280743 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.163596200E09 +++$+++ That view is one external to China and Asia.  Hukka and Wiegurs may look similar but their behavior since World War II has been rather different.  +++$+++ : That view is one external to China and Asia.  Hukka and Wiegurs may look similar but their behavior since World War II has been rather different. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 05:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

265244 +++$+++ Littlerobbergirl +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-13 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.268469720E09 +++$+++ thanks for the welcome. i probably slipped in under the radar; my first edit was for a uni. project (systems -what else?) then i didn't do anything for a year. i'll try to 'do no harm' ;-D  +++$+++ thanks for the welcome. i probably slipped in under the radar; my first edit was for a uni. project (systems -what else?) then i didn't do anything for a year. i'll try to 'do no harm' ;-D [[User:Littlerobbergirl|Littlerobbergirl]] ([[User talk:Littlerobbergirl|talk]]) 00:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
265245 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265244 +++$+++ 265244 +++$+++ 2010-03-13 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.268513940E09 +++$+++ Hope you enjoy editing here. If you are interested in Feminism consider joining the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies]] and \/ or [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies\/Feminism Task Force]] which will give you an idea of where editing is needed.   Or just edit where and whenever the mood takes you. If you need help or advice please feel free to drop a note here.  +++$+++ :Hope you enjoy editing here. If you are interested in Feminism consider joining the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies]] and / or [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies/Feminism Task Force]] which will give you an idea of where editing is needed.   Or just edit where and whenever the mood takes you. If you need help or advice please feel free to drop a note here. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 12:59, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

542890 +++$+++ Kjosh2 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542890 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-27 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.282922340E09 +++$+++ The photo belongs to the person in it - Jing Ulrich. The Fair Use tag was a mistake, and the photo was intended to be free to use by everyone. How can I update the details of the photo so that it will comply with Wikipedia copyright rules?  +++$+++ The photo belongs to the person in it - Jing Ulrich. The Fair Use tag was a mistake, and the photo was intended to be free to use by everyone. How can I update the details of the photo so that it will comply with Wikipedia copyright rules? [[User:Kjosh2|Kjosh2]] ([[User talk:Kjosh2|talk]]) 08:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
542891 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542890 +++$+++ 542890 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.282959660E09 +++$+++ Thank you for that imformation. I changed the license for you and made a reply here [[Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files\/2010_August_25#File:Jing_Ulrich_in_2010.JPG]] so that other users can see the information and reply. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for that imformation. I changed the license for you and made a reply here [[Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_August_25#File:Jing_Ulrich_in_2010.JPG]] so that other users can see the information and reply. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 18:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

18604 +++$+++ Nehrams2020 +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-02 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.309606920E09 +++$+++ The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Film\/Outreach\/June 2011 Newsletter|June 2011 issue]]''' of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film\/Outreach|Outreach department's talk page]]. --Happy editing!  +++$+++ The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Outreach/June 2011 Newsletter|June 2011 issue]]''' of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Outreach|Outreach department's talk page]]. --Happy editing! [[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nehrams2020|contrib]]) 04:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
18605 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Kollision +++$+++ 18604 +++$+++ 18604 +++$+++ 2011-07-15 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.310727840E09 +++$+++ TB-2 found it...  +++$+++ :TB-2 found it... [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 04:04, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

542895 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-27 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.290892800E09 +++$+++ You deleted that because it is available on commons with the same name. However, it's not available on Commons under that name, see [[C20XE]]. Do you know what the new name is.  +++$+++ You deleted that because it is available on commons with the same name. However, it's not available on Commons under that name, see [[C20XE]]. Do you know what the new name is. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|Enter CBW]], waits for audience [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|applause]], not a [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|sausage]]. 13:20, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
542896 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542895 +++$+++ 542895 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.290893580E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I renamed it to [[:File:Vauxhall DOHC 16V.jpg]] and moved it over.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I renamed it to [[:File:Vauxhall DOHC 16V.jpg]] and moved it over. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|Enter CBW]], waits for audience [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|applause]], not a [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|sausage]]. 13:33, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
542897 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542895 +++$+++ 542896 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.290893880E09 +++$+++ Hi! Thank you for your notice. Sorry about that. The plan was that the file(s) should only be gone for such a short moment that no one should miss it. We have a user that has transfered thousands of files to Commons and I have checked a lot of these transfers and the user makes very very few mistakes. So I put the files in a special category and did some queries to exclude files that should not be mass deleted. After these checks I mass delete the files and check the deletion log for \"red files\" (files that does not excist). This file was one of them and I undeleted this and a few others just like that shortly after deletion. Once they are visible again the plan is to check if they are on Commons under a new name. -- +++$+++ ::Hi! Thank you for your notice. Sorry about that. The plan was that the file(s) should only be gone for such a short moment that no one should miss it. We have a user that has transfered thousands of files to Commons and I have checked a lot of these transfers and the user makes very very few mistakes. So I put the files in a special category and did some queries to exclude files that should not be mass deleted. After these checks I mass delete the files and check the deletion log for "red files" (files that does not excist). This file was one of them and I undeleted this and a few others just like that shortly after deletion. Once they are visible again the plan is to check if they are on Commons under a new name. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 13:38, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
542898 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542895 +++$+++ 542897 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.290894600E09 +++$+++ No problem. these things happen.  +++$+++ :::No problem. these things happen. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|Enter CBW]], waits for audience [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|applause]], not a [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|sausage]]. 13:50, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

18608 +++$+++ Bobamnertiopsis +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18608 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.311415860E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Hey there! I saw your article, [[Dead Women Crossing, Oklahoma]], on DYK a while back. My goal this summer has been to write six short plays, and your article proved to be an intriguing basis for the first of six that I wrote, aptly titled ''Dead Women Crossing''. It turned out to be an exciting mystery, and though I changed many of the details and, in fact, assigned the blame for the crime to someone other than the person to whom the article assigned it, it still proved a very solid and mysterious basis in fact. I just wanted to give you props for starting the article that inspired this one-act. Thanks so much, and keep it up!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hey there! I saw your article, [[Dead Women Crossing, Oklahoma]], on DYK a while back. My goal this summer has been to write six short plays, and your article proved to be an intriguing basis for the first of six that I wrote, aptly titled ''Dead Women Crossing''. It turned out to be an exciting mystery, and though I changed many of the details and, in fact, assigned the blame for the crime to someone other than the person to whom the article assigned it, it still proved a very solid and mysterious basis in fact. I just wanted to give you props for starting the article that inspired this one-act. Thanks so much, and keep it up! [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|<font color="660000" face="Andalus">'''Bob'''</font><font color="00FFCC">Amnertiopsis</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bobamnertiopsis|∴]]<sub><font color="FF9999" face="Tunga">[[User talk:Bobamnertiopsis|ChatMe!]]</font></sub> 03:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
18609 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18608 +++$+++ 18608 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.311416160E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much for letting me know my work was useful for you! It is the best award any wikipedia contributor could get. Good luck with your work.-- +++$+++ :Thank you so much for letting me know my work was useful for you! It is the best award any wikipedia contributor could get. Good luck with your work.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 03:16, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
18610 +++$+++ Bobamnertiopsis +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18608 +++$+++ 18609 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311416760E09 +++$+++ You're so welcome. It was an intriguing article.  +++$+++ ::You're so welcome. It was an intriguing article. [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|<font color="660000" face="Andalus">'''Bob'''</font><font color="00FFCC">Amnertiopsis</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bobamnertiopsis|∴]]<sub><font color="FF9999" face="Tunga">[[User talk:Bobamnertiopsis|ChatMe!]]</font></sub> 03:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

533091 +++$+++ J. Van Meter +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-26 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.204067340E09 +++$+++ hi - i just left a question for you over at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:In_the_news_section_on_the_Main_Page\/Candidates#Philharmonic_in_North_Korea Main Page discussion].  +++$+++ hi - i just left a question for you over at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:In_the_news_section_on_the_Main_Page/Candidates#Philharmonic_in_North_Korea Main Page discussion]. [[User:J. Van Meter|J. Van Meter]] ([[User talk:J. Van Meter|talk]]) 15:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
533092 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533091 +++$+++ 533091 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.204080660E09 +++$+++ I suppose you mean the language categories. They got deleted because they were empty and there is one of the speedy criteria for those. However, the deletion was already discussed, maybe it would be better to leave them as they fill in the system. The csd criteria could be adjusted a bit. I don't think we've got anywhere from that point... This will have to be addressed once more but in a more centralized discussion with more people participating. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : I suppose you mean the language categories. They got deleted because they were empty and there is one of the speedy criteria for those. However, the deletion was already discussed, maybe it would be better to leave them as they fill in the system. The csd criteria could be adjusted a bit. I don't think we've got anywhere from that point... This will have to be addressed once more but in a more centralized discussion with more people participating. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

18612 +++$+++ Shuki +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18612 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311772740E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on getting today's feature picture on the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Main_Page main page]. I'm also sorry to see that you've allowed the bullies push you into despair to leave the project. You are a valued editor and have contributed more in several days than they have since they registered. I understand that you are leaving the project because of trolls and administrators that are acting on their behalf. I'm hoping to see you back when you are ready. -- +++$+++ Congratulations on getting today's feature picture on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page main page]. I'm also sorry to see that you've allowed the bullies push you into despair to leave the project. You are a valued editor and have contributed more in several days than they have since they registered. I understand that you are leaving the project because of trolls and administrators that are acting on their behalf. I'm hoping to see you back when you are ready. --[[User:Shuki|Shuki]] ([[User talk:Shuki|talk]]) 06:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
18613 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18612 +++$+++ 18612 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.311814020E09 +++$+++ Thank you for kind words, Shuki! Actually I was going to leave the project for quite some time because I am busy in real life, and not because of trolls and wikihounds. Leaving the project because of trolls and their pet administrators acting on their requests means allow them to win. It is not for me. But you are right about trolls taking over the project. In June of 2005 RickK, who I believe was an administrator had this to say: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:RickK&diff=16127113&oldid=15537910 \"There is a fatal flaw in the system. Vandals, trolls and malactors are given respect, whereas those who are here to actually create an encyclopedia, and to do meaningful work, are slapped in the face and not given the support needed to do the work they need to do.\"] It is sad that now in July of 2011 (6 years after it was said) I could sign under each statement RickK made. I also could sign under this comment that definitely is true concerning quite a few administrators: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/MickMacNee\/Workshop&diff=prev&oldid=435539168 \"The way you dish out blocks is worse than any admin I've ever seen, but you cannot or will not accept that there is a problem. You lack the judgement, and the thickness of skin, to do the job properly; you lack the compassion, humanity and humility to admit it when you fuck up\"]. OK, I guess I'd better stop here :-) Best wishes, and happy editing to you,Shuki.-- +++$+++ :Thank you for kind words, Shuki! Actually I was going to leave the project for quite some time because I am busy in real life, and not because of trolls and wikihounds. Leaving the project because of trolls and their pet administrators acting on their requests means allow them to win. It is not for me. But you are right about trolls taking over the project. In June of 2005 RickK, who I believe was an administrator had this to say: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:RickK&diff=16127113&oldid=15537910 "There is a fatal flaw in the system. Vandals, trolls and malactors are given respect, whereas those who are here to actually create an encyclopedia, and to do meaningful work, are slapped in the face and not given the support needed to do the work they need to do."] It is sad that now in July of 2011 (6 years after it was said) I could sign under each statement RickK made. I also could sign under this comment that definitely is true concerning quite a few administrators: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MickMacNee/Workshop&diff=prev&oldid=435539168 "The way you dish out blocks is worse than any admin I've ever seen, but you cannot or will not accept that there is a problem. You lack the judgement, and the thickness of skin, to do the job properly; you lack the compassion, humanity and humility to admit it when you fuck up"]. OK, I guess I'd better stop here :-) Best wishes, and happy editing to you,Shuki.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 17:47, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
18614 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18612 +++$+++ 18613 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311955500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for \"compassion, humanity and humility\"! I makes me sad to see the best [[User_talk:BarkingMoon#Good_riddance_and_goodbye|leaving]]. Looks like I could have written my essay on \"[[Messiah Part II#23|rejected]]\" also for you, -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for "compassion, humanity and humility"! I makes me sad to see the best [[User_talk:BarkingMoon#Good_riddance_and_goodbye|leaving]]. Looks like I could have written my essay on "[[Messiah Part II#23|rejected]]" also for you, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
18615 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18612 +++$+++ 18614 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.311969900E09 +++$+++ Thank you for kind words,Gerda. I've just read some  [[:User:BarkingMoon|editor]]'s contributions, and it made me sad seeing such interesting content contributor got so [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&action=historysubmit&diff=437962792&oldid=437960256 desperate] that they decided to leave.It was very kind of you,Gerda, to be there for this person, when they needed some words of support. Best wishes, and happy editing.-- +++$+++ :::Thank you for kind words,Gerda. I've just read some  [[:User:BarkingMoon|editor]]'s contributions, and it made me sad seeing such interesting content contributor got so [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&action=historysubmit&diff=437962792&oldid=437960256 desperate] that they decided to leave.It was very kind of you,Gerda, to be there for this person, when they needed some words of support. Best wishes, and happy editing.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 13:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
18616 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18612 +++$+++ 18612 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.311962340E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the kind words.Best wishes.-- +++$+++ :Thank you for the kind words.Best wishes.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 10:59, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

542903 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-23 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.293163500E09 +++$+++ However, who is the author of the file? [[:File:Envelope follower.jpg]] does not tell but we can asume it was the uploader. -- +++$+++ However, who is the author of the file? [[:File:Envelope follower.jpg]] does not tell but we can asume it was the uploader. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 20:05, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
542904 +++$+++ Spinningspark +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542903 +++$+++ 542903 +++$+++ 2010-12-23 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.293164820E09 +++$+++ I would guess so, the uploader inserted the \"release to public domain\" template.  +++$+++ :I would guess so, the uploader inserted the "release to public domain" template. [[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#FFF090;color:#00C000">'''Sp<font style="background:#FFF0A0;color:#80C000">in<font style="color:#C08000">ni</font></font><font style="color:#C00000">ng</font></font><font style="color:#2820F0">Spark'''</font>]] 20:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
542905 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542903 +++$+++ 542903 +++$+++ 2010-12-27 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.293506760E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your tip. :-) -- +++$+++ :Thank you for your tip. :-) --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 19:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

18617 +++$+++ Nikthestoned +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 08:40:00 +++$+++ 1.311954000E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:The best way to avoid ever being blocked]], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion\/Wikipedia:The best way to avoid ever being blocked ]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki>).  You are free to edit the content of [[Wikipedia:The best way to avoid ever being blocked]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion.  Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ''' +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:The best way to avoid ever being blocked]], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:The best way to avoid ever being blocked ]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).  You are free to edit the content of [[Wikipedia:The best way to avoid ever being blocked]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion.  Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> '''[[User:Nikthestoned|<font color="MidnightBlue">Nik</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Nikthestoned|<font color="CornflowerBlue">''the''</font>]][[User talk:Nikthestoned|<font color="ForestGreen">stoned</font>]]''' 08:40, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
18618 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18617 +++$+++ 18617 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.311970920E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the funniest MfD I've ever got, and for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AMiscellany_for_deletion%2FWikipedia%3AThe_best_way_to_avoid_ever_being_blocked&action=historysubmit&diff=442015923&oldid=442011068 making fun of me] :-) I like to laugh even, if the subject is myself, and I mean it. Best wishes.-- +++$+++ :Thank you for the funniest MfD I've ever got, and for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AMiscellany_for_deletion%2FWikipedia%3AThe_best_way_to_avoid_ever_being_blocked&action=historysubmit&diff=442015923&oldid=442011068 making fun of me] :-) I like to laugh even, if the subject is myself, and I mean it. Best wishes.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 13:22, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
18619 +++$+++ Nikthestoned +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18617 +++$+++ 18618 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312224300E09 +++$+++ I'd hardly call it making fun of you when you requested the block yourself by email... ''' +++$+++ ::I'd hardly call it making fun of you when you requested the block yourself by email... '''[[User:Nikthestoned|<font color="MidnightBlue">Nik</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Nikthestoned|<font color="CornflowerBlue">''the''</font>]][[User talk:Nikthestoned|<font color="ForestGreen">stoned</font>]]''' 11:45, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
18620 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18617 +++$+++ 18619 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.312239600E09 +++$+++ It's OK. I really do not mind, if somebody making fun of myself.As a matter of fact I am the first one to make fun of myself, and it is funny that an editor who is blocked indefinitely  was not able to follow her own simple instructions :-) in order not to get blocked :-) Besides no matter of the outcome of this MfD I am having a great time with this. First of all during the three days it was nominated it got [http:\/\/stats.grok.se\/en\/latest\/Wikipedia:The_best_way_to_avoid_ever_being_blocked many more views] than it got during its prior lifespan (so my work did not go down in vain :-)), second of all I am really enjoying some laughable arguments of two [[File:TrollFace.svg|200px]] [[File:Internet Troll.png|200px]] (I hope they recognize themselves in these pictures :-) ), so thanks to you I am having a good time all around with this MfD. Cheers.-- +++$+++ :::It's OK. I really do not mind, if somebody making fun of myself.As a matter of fact I am the first one to make fun of myself, and it is funny that an editor who is blocked indefinitely  was not able to follow her own simple instructions :-) in order not to get blocked :-) Besides no matter of the outcome of this MfD I am having a great time with this. First of all during the three days it was nominated it got [http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Wikipedia:The_best_way_to_avoid_ever_being_blocked many more views] than it got during its prior lifespan (so my work did not go down in vain :-)), second of all I am really enjoying some laughable arguments of two [[File:TrollFace.svg|200px]] [[File:Internet Troll.png|200px]] (I hope they recognize themselves in these pictures :-) ), so thanks to you I am having a good time all around with this MfD. Cheers.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 16:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

542907 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542907 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-31 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.293799200E09 +++$+++ Take care.  +++$+++ Take care. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 04:40, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
542908 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542907 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-31 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.293821100E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your note. I deleted the file. Happy New Year to you and your loved ones also. -- +++$+++ ::Thank you for your note. I deleted the file. Happy New Year to you and your loved ones also. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 10:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

18621 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.312132440E09 +++$+++ Come back! We need you! Your contributions were invaluable!\u2666  +++$+++ Come back! We need you! Your contributions were invaluable!♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. Blofeld</span>]] 10:14, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
18622 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18621 +++$+++ 18621 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.312238640E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the kind words, but I am afraid that now after [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Rd232 my blocking administrator has retired] coming back for me would be quite impossible :-) On a more serious note I am busy in a real life. I might come back one day, but it will not be any time soon. Best wishes.-- +++$+++ :Thank you for the kind words, but I am afraid that now after [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rd232 my blocking administrator has retired] coming back for me would be quite impossible :-) On a more serious note I am busy in a real life. I might come back one day, but it will not be any time soon. Best wishes.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 15:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

280767 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280767 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.164852480E09 +++$+++ Thank you, of course.  It would help if you were a bit more specific about which article(s) you are monitoring.  Also, I note that the 3RR does not apply to vandalism, and it does not apply to reverting a blocked user or their sock puppets.  +++$+++ Thank you, of course.  It would help if you were a bit more specific about which article(s) you are monitoring.  Also, I note that the 3RR does not apply to vandalism, and it does not apply to reverting a blocked user or their sock puppets. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 18:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
280768 +++$+++ Samsara +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280767 +++$+++ 280767 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.164854640E09 +++$+++ [[Evolution]]. -  +++$+++ :[[Evolution]]. - [[User:Samsara|Samsara]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Samsara|talk]]&nbsp;<small>•</small>&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Samsara|contribs]]) 18:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

18624 +++$+++ Rd232 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18624 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.312252680E09 +++$+++ Mbz1, I've reblocked without talkpage access, as [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mbz1&diff=442527438&oldid=442525645 this] breaches our informal email agreement on what sort of use of your talkpage while blocked is acceptable. Sorry, but there it is. On the bright side, you now have no excuse at all not to seek out greener pastures.  +++$+++ Mbz1, I've reblocked without talkpage access, as [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mbz1&diff=442527438&oldid=442525645 this] breaches our informal email agreement on what sort of use of your talkpage while blocked is acceptable. Sorry, but there it is. On the bright side, you now have no excuse at all not to seek out greener pastures. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 19:38, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
18625 +++$+++ Wnt +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18624 +++$+++ 18624 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.312344180E09 +++$+++ I have no idea why this prolific user would be denied talk page access for saying \"trolls\" with a pair of cartoons, while [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mbz1&diff=prev&oldid=440924145 this edit summary] raised no eyebrows, even as that editor seemed involved with some odd argument about moving around comments on this userpage which doubtless had some role in provoking this response.  I'm just glad that Mbz1 and his exceptional photography are still welcome on [[Commons:User:Mbz1|Commons]], which still remembers that content should always be the highest priority.  +++$+++ :I have no idea why this prolific user would be denied talk page access for saying "trolls" with a pair of cartoons, while [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mbz1&diff=prev&oldid=440924145 this edit summary] raised no eyebrows, even as that editor seemed involved with some odd argument about moving around comments on this userpage which doubtless had some role in provoking this response.  I'm just glad that Mbz1 and his exceptional photography are still welcome on [[Commons:User:Mbz1|Commons]], which still remembers that content should always be the highest priority. [[User:Wnt|Wnt]] ([[User talk:Wnt|talk]]) 21:03, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
18626 +++$+++ ברוקולי +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18624 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.312414440E09 +++$+++ After Mbz1 is personally attacked a few times in the same MfD she responds to the attacks in the only place she was able to do it on her own talk page. One of the attackers takes her to AN, and bah her talk page access is removed without giving her an opportunity to say a single word in her defense. It is much worse than [[Kangaroo court]]. Now Mbz1's talk page access is removed and her attackers are not even warned. Way to go Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :::After Mbz1 is personally attacked a few times in the same MfD she responds to the attacks in the only place she was able to do it on her own talk page. One of the attackers takes her to AN, and bah her talk page access is removed without giving her an opportunity to say a single word in her defense. It is much worse than [[Kangaroo court]]. Now Mbz1's talk page access is removed and her attackers are not even warned. Way to go Wikipedia. [[User:ברוקולי|Broccolo]] ([[User talk:ברוקולי|talk]]) 16:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
18627 +++$+++ Rd232 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18624 +++$+++ 18625 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312392120E09 +++$+++ Mbz1 was blocked at her request, and as I said there was a private agreement not to use her talkpage while blocked for attacking other editors. Concurrently, it is ''very'' bad form to come to a blocked user's talkpage to attack them, so I hope there will be no more of that. But even concerned\/interested comments like yours are not really necessary or helpful at this point. Those interested in talking to her can reach her at Commons, where her account is not blocked (though not currently active).  +++$+++ ::Mbz1 was blocked at her request, and as I said there was a private agreement not to use her talkpage while blocked for attacking other editors. Concurrently, it is ''very'' bad form to come to a blocked user's talkpage to attack them, so I hope there will be no more of that. But even concerned/interested comments like yours are not really necessary or helpful at this point. Those interested in talking to her can reach her at Commons, where her account is not blocked (though not currently active). [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 10:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
18628 +++$+++ NickCT +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18624 +++$+++ 18627 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.312402680E09 +++$+++ Without trying to appear too critical of [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] - \"private agreement\"s are probably not the best way to operate, particularly in cases where the editor you're going into a \"private agreement\" with is often the source of wikilawyering.  +++$+++ :::Without trying to appear too critical of [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] - "private agreement"s are probably not the best way to operate, particularly in cases where the editor you're going into a "private agreement" with is often the source of wikilawyering. [[User:NickCT|NickCT]] ([[User talk:NickCT|talk]]) 13:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
18629 +++$+++ Rd232 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18624 +++$+++ 18628 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312471320E09 +++$+++ Mbz1's exit involved private issues, which required a private agreement to resolve. I've restored access now (before seeing your comment).  +++$+++ ::::Mbz1's exit involved private issues, which required a private agreement to resolve. I've restored access now (before seeing your comment). [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 08:22, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
18630 +++$+++ NickCT +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18624 +++$+++ 18629 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.312490520E09 +++$+++ Ok [[User:Rd232|Rd232]].  I guess without having the details of the \"private issues\", one can only assume you acting properly and in good faith.  Thanks for restoring the access.  +++$+++ :::::Ok [[User:Rd232|Rd232]].  I guess without having the details of the "private issues", one can only assume you acting properly and in good faith.  Thanks for restoring the access. [[User:NickCT|NickCT]] ([[User talk:NickCT|talk]]) 13:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

265248 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-31 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.270095480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions to [[Louise Hay]]. However I notice that, back in 2008, you added material that is almost a verbatim copy of the text in the source.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Louise_Hay&diff=212425071&oldid=212402791][http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/05\/04\/magazine\/04Hay-t.html?_r=1] That's really not proper, per [[WP:plagiarism]]. Could you please review your work and make sure that the text is placed in quotation marks or is your own original writing? &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions to [[Louise Hay]]. However I notice that, back in 2008, you added material that is almost a verbatim copy of the text in the source.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Louise_Hay&diff=212425071&oldid=212402791][http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/04/magazine/04Hay-t.html?_r=1] That's really not proper, per [[WP:plagiarism]]. Could you please review your work and make sure that the text is placed in quotation marks or is your own original writing? &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 21:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
265249 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265248 +++$+++ 265248 +++$+++ 2010-03-31 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.270102920E09 +++$+++ I don't believe direct quotations are appropriate here. I have strengthened the [[reported speech]] used in this section to make it clear it is Hay speaking through Oppenheimer.  +++$+++ :I don't believe direct quotations are appropriate here. I have strengthened the [[reported speech]] used in this section to make it clear it is Hay speaking through Oppenheimer. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 23:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
265250 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265248 +++$+++ 265249 +++$+++ 2010-03-31 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.270103580E09 +++$+++ I know it's hard to reword material taken from a single source, and I appreciate your effort. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::I know it's hard to reword material taken from a single source, and I appreciate your effort. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 23:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

542915 +++$+++ GiacomoReturned +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542915 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-02 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.293993900E09 +++$+++ Before slapping templates on images and requesting speedy deletion, and then notifying user pages with re-direct, why don't you just to check to see if there is not just a simple typo [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File%3AUnesalledelareinedeFrance.jpg&action=historysubmit&diff=405475746&oldid=405473653] - something you could sort out yourself. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Before slapping templates on images and requesting speedy deletion, and then notifying user pages with re-direct, why don't you just to check to see if there is not just a simple typo [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AUnesalledelareinedeFrance.jpg&action=historysubmit&diff=405475746&oldid=405473653] - something you could sort out yourself. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:GiacomoReturned|<span style="color:White;background:Black;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Giacomo&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 10:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
542916 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542915 +++$+++ 542915 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.293994140E09 +++$+++ Yes if we are sure that PS = PD. -- +++$+++ : Yes if we are sure that PS = PD. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 10:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
542917 +++$+++ GiacomoReturned +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542915 +++$+++ 542916 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.293994260E09 +++$+++ Well why not ask? Instead of trying to have pages deleted and leaving messages on redirected page. Just take the trouble to look at what you are doing. There is no prize for the most images deleted in one day. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::Well why not ask? Instead of trying to have pages deleted and leaving messages on redirected page. Just take the trouble to look at what you are doing. There is no prize for the most images deleted in one day. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:GiacomoReturned|<span style="color:White;background:Black;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Giacomo&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 10:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
542918 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542915 +++$+++ 542917 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.293994800E09 +++$+++ As for the problem with the redirected page I agree it is a problem. But as you may have noticed it was added using a script. I agree that it would be nice if the script was corrected. -- +++$+++ ::: As for the problem with the redirected page I agree it is a problem. But as you may have noticed it was added using a script. I agree that it would be nice if the script was corrected. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 11:00, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
542919 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542915 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.293999960E09 +++$+++ Yes, now that I know that the script does not always inform the right user I will check. -- +++$+++ :::::Yes, now that I know that the script does not always inform the right user I will check. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 12:26, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
542920 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542915 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.294000200E09 +++$+++ By the way. On Commos I always check that oploader has been informed before I delete because of \"no license\". Does admins not do that on en-wiki? If so they should notice if I or any other users made a mistake. -- +++$+++ :::::By the way. On Commos I always check that oploader has been informed before I delete because of "no license". Does admins not do that on en-wiki? If so they should notice if I or any other users made a mistake. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 12:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

280772 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-01 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.165037640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Hu|Hu]] 21:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
280773 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280772 +++$+++ 280772 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.165038960E09 +++$+++ I was taught to use it instead of while when speaking\/writing in the past tense, but then I was taught about pounds (and ounces), shillings and pence - and yards, chains, furlongs and acres (along with metric, I should add). Of course, any encyclopedia exists to inform succinctly and coherently and not to preserve vocabulary. In short, your reasons are valid (and your references impeccable). +++$+++ :I was taught to use it instead of while when speaking/writing in the past tense, but then I was taught about pounds (and ounces), shillings and pence - and yards, chains, furlongs and acres (along with metric, I should add). Of course, any encyclopedia exists to inform succinctly and coherently and not to preserve vocabulary. In short, your reasons are valid (and your references impeccable).[[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 21:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

483702 +++$+++ Couillaud +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.193784480E09 +++$+++ --   +++$+++ --  [[User:Couillaud|Couillaud]] 15:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
483703 +++$+++ Couillaud +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483702 +++$+++ 483702 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.194003480E09 +++$+++ I want to file a complaint about this user for his remarks on the King's Daughters.  If you would threaten to block an anonymous user for making the original trolls, then I need to know what I can do about this editor with the history that he already has.  His pattern the last time this happened was to follow me around and read my edits, so he'll probably read and respond to this soon, and try to preempt it with his own complaint.  Last time he tried to act the injured party himself.  There must be a procedure to complain about an editor like this, especially considering his prior behavior.  Please let me know what procedure I need to follow to deal with this issue.  --  +++$+++ :I want to file a complaint about this user for his remarks on the King's Daughters.  If you would threaten to block an anonymous user for making the original trolls, then I need to know what I can do about this editor with the history that he already has.  His pattern the last time this happened was to follow me around and read my edits, so he'll probably read and respond to this soon, and try to preempt it with his own complaint.  Last time he tried to act the injured party himself.  There must be a procedure to complain about an editor like this, especially considering his prior behavior.  Please let me know what procedure I need to follow to deal with this issue.  -- [[User:Couillaud|Couillaud]] 04:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
483704 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483702 +++$+++ 483703 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.194004080E09 +++$+++ Maybe we could put him and Ron Liebman in the same jar, and see which one survives.  +++$+++ ::Maybe we could put him and Ron Liebman in the same jar, and see which one survives. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 04:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
483705 +++$+++ YoSoyGuapo +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483702 +++$+++ 483703 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.194004320E09 +++$+++ At no point did I suppor the \"alleged\" trolls commentary. I only stated that he could easily use google to find references.  Which is where the article about the King's Daughters in Namibea.  If a complaint is brought I always like to be able to respond to it.  As such I did.   +++$+++ ::At no point did I suppor the "alleged" trolls commentary. I only stated that he could easily use google to find references.  Which is where the article about the King's Daughters in Namibea.  If a complaint is brought I always like to be able to respond to it.  As such I did.  [[User:YoSoyGuapo|YoSoyGuapo]] 04:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
483706 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483702 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.194042120E09 +++$+++ Even if all his facts were correct, YoSoyGuano writes as if he just start learning English last week. The Gibson article, thanks to his \"improvements\", is really trashy looking now.  +++$+++ ::::Even if all his facts were correct, YoSoyGuano writes as if he just start learning English last week. The Gibson article, thanks to his "improvements", is really trashy looking now. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 15:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

18632 +++$+++ Panyd +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.312441980E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 00:13, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
18633 +++$+++ Gerda Arendt +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ 18632 +++$+++ 18632 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312468320E09 +++$+++ Thank you for an interesting article! It's now at [[Portal:Germany]]. I tell others editors: feel free to place DYK related to Germany there yourself. Feel free?! - I took your caring words above to my heart, -- +++$+++ :Thank you for an interesting article! It's now at [[Portal:Germany]]. I tell others editors: feel free to place DYK related to Germany there yourself. Feel free?! - I took your caring words above to my heart, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:32, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

280777 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-01 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.165022160E09 +++$+++ Thank you for blocking [[User:Gnr8675]] [[Special:Contributions\/Gnr8675|contribs]] ([[User Talk:Gnr8675|talk]]).  However, this user is a vandalism only account.  If you don't block it indefinitely, we or somebody else will have to clean up and ultimately block it indefinitely.  +++$+++ Thank you for blocking [[User:Gnr8675]] [[Special:Contributions/Gnr8675|contribs]] ([[User Talk:Gnr8675|talk]]).  However, this user is a vandalism only account.  If you don't block it indefinitely, we or somebody else will have to clean up and ultimately block it indefinitely. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 17:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
280778 +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280777 +++$+++ 280777 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.165024920E09 +++$+++ A fair point; on closer inspection, I see that all of their edits occurred today and that they are all disruptive in one way or another, so I have increased the block to indefinite. Regards,  +++$+++ :A fair point; on closer inspection, I see that all of their edits occurred today and that they are all disruptive in one way or another, so I have increased the block to indefinite. Regards, [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 18:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

542922 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542922 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-09 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.294610220E09 +++$+++ As I understand it by adding this template you agree to [[Template:GFDL]] and [[Template:Cc-by-sa-3.0]]. Is that correct? -- +++$+++ As I understand it by adding this template you agree to [[Template:GFDL]] and [[Template:Cc-by-sa-3.0]]. Is that correct? --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73|talk]]) 13:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
542923 +++$+++ Cuddlyable3 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542922 +++$+++ 542922 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.294639140E09 +++$+++ I want to confirm that I really do release the image to Public Domain. I confirm that it is all my own work and that I relinquish all claim for attribution. Anyone can take it.  +++$+++ :I want to confirm that I really do release the image to Public Domain. I confirm that it is all my own work and that I relinquish all claim for attribution. Anyone can take it. [[User:Cuddlyable3|Cuddlyable3]] ([[User talk:Cuddlyable3|talk]]) 21:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
542924 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542922 +++$+++ 542923 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.294639260E09 +++$+++ Thank you :-) -- +++$+++ ::Thank you :-) --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 22:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

18635 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-18 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.153251240E09 +++$+++ Oh, btw - I have seen you label your images \"Category:Ford vehicles\" and similarly. There are often much more detailed categories, like \"Category:Ford Windstar\" etc. It is generally good practice to label the image with the most detailed category available, to help users that might be looking for an image. Thanks!  +++$+++ Oh, btw - I have seen you label your images "Category:Ford vehicles" and similarly. There are often much more detailed categories, like "Category:Ford Windstar" etc. It is generally good practice to label the image with the most detailed category available, to help users that might be looking for an image. Thanks! [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 12:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
18636 +++$+++ ApolloBoy +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18635 +++$+++ 18635 +++$+++ 2006-07-18 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.153277640E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm very impressed with your pics! I suggest you upload your pics to the Commons, so that they can be used in other Wikis. -- +++$+++ :Yeah, I'm very impressed with your pics! I suggest you upload your pics to the Commons, so that they can be used in other Wikis. --[[User:ApolloBoy|ApolloBoy]] 19:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
18637 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18635 +++$+++ 18636 +++$+++ 2006-07-18 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.153278120E09 +++$+++ You might have not noticed, but IFCAR is one of the few people who do so.  +++$+++ ::You might have not noticed, but IFCAR is one of the few people who do so. [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 20:02, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
18638 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18635 +++$+++ 18637 +++$+++ 2006-07-18 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.153279680E09 +++$+++ I do what I've been taught. Bravada explained clearly how to upload a picture to the Commons, so that's where I put them.  +++$+++ :::I do what I've been taught. Bravada explained clearly how to upload a picture to the Commons, so that's where I put them. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 20:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

568008 +++$+++ 52 Pickup +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568008 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-01 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.204438260E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for giving your support to my admin application, which recently closed successfully (36\/3\/1). I hope I can continue to justify the confidence that you have placed in me. If there is any way that I can help out more, please drop me a line. Thanks again. -  +++$+++ Thank you very much for giving your support to my admin application, which recently closed successfully (36/3/1). I hope I can continue to justify the confidence that you have placed in me. If there is any way that I can help out more, please drop me a line. Thanks again. - [[User:52 Pickup|<font color="#1E90FF">'''52 Pickup'''</font >]] [[User_talk:52 Pickup|<font color="purple">(deal)</font>]] 22:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
568009 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568008 +++$+++ 568008 +++$+++ 2008-03-03 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.204571820E09 +++$+++ Just a note, I am not an administrator. But I am a rollbacker. [[User:NHRHS2010|<span style=\"background:black;color:red;font:10pt cooper black\">NHRHS<\/span>]][[User talk:NHRHS2010|<span style=\"background:red;color:black;font:10pt lucida sans\">2010<\/span>]] +++$+++ :Just a note, I am not an administrator. But I am a rollbacker. [[User:NHRHS2010|<span style="background:black;color:red;font:10pt cooper black">NHRHS</span>]][[User talk:NHRHS2010|<span style="background:red;color:black;font:10pt lucida sans">2010</span>]][[User:NHRHS2010|<font color="red" size="2"></font>]] 11:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

542925 +++$+++ Coolbd +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-14 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.295013960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your notice. Continuing to learn. I have added the LGPL license with the [[:File:Bangla.jpg]] screenshot that is used in [[Avro Keyboard]]. I think it is ok now. It is a screenshot of OpenOffice software which is under LGPL. Please tell me if there is anything wrong.---- +++$+++ Thanks for your notice. Continuing to learn. I have added the LGPL license with the [[:File:Bangla.jpg]] screenshot that is used in [[Avro Keyboard]]. I think it is ok now. It is a screenshot of OpenOffice software which is under LGPL. Please tell me if there is anything wrong.----[[User:Coolbd|Cool BD]] ([[User talk:Coolbd|talk]]) 06:06, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
542926 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542925 +++$+++ 542925 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.295031300E09 +++$+++ The license looks ok to me. I removed the \"ugly\" CSD now :-) -- +++$+++ :The license looks ok to me. I removed the "ugly" CSD now :-) --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 10:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
542927 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542925 +++$+++ 542925 +++$+++ 2011-01-16 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.295228940E09 +++$+++ Yes it is ok now :-) Thank you. -- +++$+++ :Yes it is ok now :-) Thank you. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 17:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

18639 +++$+++ Bull-Doser +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18639 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-22 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.153624680E09 +++$+++ And the winner is?  Stay tuned! --  +++$+++ And the winner is?  Stay tuned! -- [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]] 20:18, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
18640 +++$+++ WDWbuff +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18639 +++$+++ 18639 +++$+++ 2006-07-24 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.153795500E09 +++$+++ I agree with [[User:Bavaria|Bavaria]] and [[User:Scheinwerfermann|Scheinwerfamann]]. Free images are usually of much poorer quality than fair use ones. They are usually fuzzy, blurry, and of cars that do not look clean. For Example: \"Image:1st-gen Neon.jpg\", \"Image:Plymouth Acclaim.jpg\", \"Image:Mercury-Villager.jpg\", and \"Image:Chrysler-Town-and-Country.jpg\", to name a few. Plus in your case(I read your bio) I don't think you should just be taking pictures of random cars on the street.  +++$+++ :I agree with [[User:Bavaria|Bavaria]] and [[User:Scheinwerfermann|Scheinwerfamann]]. Free images are usually of much poorer quality than fair use ones. They are usually fuzzy, blurry, and of cars that do not look clean. For Example: "Image:1st-gen Neon.jpg", "Image:Plymouth Acclaim.jpg", "Image:Mercury-Villager.jpg", and "Image:Chrysler-Town-and-Country.jpg", to name a few. Plus in your case(I read your bio) I don't think you should just be taking pictures of random cars on the street. [[User:WDWbuff|WDWbuff]] 19:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
18641 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18639 +++$+++ 18640 +++$+++ 2006-07-24 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.153806840E09 +++$+++ I don't personally put any of the pics of especially ugly cars (like that Acclaim) in their Wikipedia articles. In cases like that, someone else retrieves them from the Commons and puts them in. The way I see it, a pic of a car in mediocre condition or a picture with a bad angle or lighting ought to coexist with a fair use image, but as it clearly says on the fair use tag, \"It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of promotional material...in the absence of free images that could serve such a purpose...qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement.\" As long as the fair use image is of adequate quality and gives an adequate view of the car, it should be used instead. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with taking pictures of parked cars, legally or ethically. Why don't you bring this up in the WikiProject Automobiles talk page, see what others have to say.  +++$+++ ::I don't personally put any of the pics of especially ugly cars (like that Acclaim) in their Wikipedia articles. In cases like that, someone else retrieves them from the Commons and puts them in. The way I see it, a pic of a car in mediocre condition or a picture with a bad angle or lighting ought to coexist with a fair use image, but as it clearly says on the fair use tag, "It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of promotional material...in the absence of free images that could serve such a purpose...qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement." As long as the fair use image is of adequate quality and gives an adequate view of the car, it should be used instead. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with taking pictures of parked cars, legally or ethically. Why don't you bring this up in the WikiProject Automobiles talk page, see what others have to say. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 22:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
18642 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18639 +++$+++ 18639 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.154490060E09 +++$+++ I'd never seen that, thanks. I'll leave that off in the future, but I have too many for me or anyone else to want to go through and fix that little quibble.  +++$+++ :I'd never seen that, thanks. I'll leave that off in the future, but I have too many for me or anyone else to want to go through and fix that little quibble. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 20:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

542929 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-19 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.295506800E09 +++$+++ I'm really seeing no evidence that this image is free. Are you able to shed any light on the issue?  +++$+++ I'm really seeing no evidence that this image is free. Are you able to shed any light on the issue? [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 23:00, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
542930 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542929 +++$+++ 542929 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.295550960E09 +++$+++ No. I have the same problem. The only hope is the note on file talk that author gave a permission (se just need to see it in OTRS). My changes was only to make the links to the source work. -- +++$+++ :No. I have the same problem. The only hope is the note on file talk that author gave a permission (se just need to see it in OTRS). My changes was only to make the links to the source work. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 11:16, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

523863 +++$+++ AKMask +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 523863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-28 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.180415280E09 +++$+++ So you know, I just went back and saw what you had done with my little archived record on Phaedriel's page, and I have to say for someone who doesnt know me, you got me amazingly right. I even had an essay about Dickinson's views published in my college newspaper. Well, this is of really no consequence in the long run, but for the record, I appreciate it greatly. -<u> +++$+++ So you know, I just went back and saw what you had done with my little archived record on Phaedriel's page, and I have to say for someone who doesnt know me, you got me amazingly right. I even had an essay about Dickinson's views published in my college newspaper. Well, this is of really no consequence in the long run, but for the record, I appreciate it greatly. -<u>[[User:AKMask|<font color="000000">M</font>]]<small><sup>[[User talk:AKMask|<font color="000000">ask?</font>]]</sup></small></u> 22:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
523864 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 523863 +++$+++ 523863 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.180476360E09 +++$+++ :-) I'm glad. You're right, I don't know you at all the way that Phaedriel, presumably, does (does she know everyone?) but I did read your user page. Thank you very much. -- +++$+++ : :-) I'm glad. You're right, I don't know you at all the way that Phaedriel, presumably, does (does she know everyone?) but I did read your user page. Thank you very much. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 15:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

18643 +++$+++ Bull-Doser +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-12 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.155434580E09 +++$+++ DO NOT update my [[Nissan Armada]] page.  We need the badging variants (as shown on that page) of [[2004]] & the [[2005]]-present bagding on the rear! --  +++$+++ DO NOT update my [[Nissan Armada]] page.  We need the badging variants (as shown on that page) of [[2004]] & the [[2005]]-present bagding on the rear! -- [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]] 19:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
18644 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18643 +++$+++ 18643 +++$+++ 2006-08-12 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.155434820E09 +++$+++ I know this is not my talk page, but I hope you know that no article is '''yours''' nor anybody's for that matter. Everybody is free to make all changes they want to any articles - on the condition that they conform with general guidelines and standards for articles and other rules. BTW, adding random pictures of dirty cars shown from weird angles is not particularly according to the rules. Regards,  +++$+++ :I know this is not my talk page, but I hope you know that no article is '''yours''' nor anybody's for that matter. Everybody is free to make all changes they want to any articles - on the condition that they conform with general guidelines and standards for articles and other rules. BTW, adding random pictures of dirty cars shown from weird angles is not particularly according to the rules. Regards, [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 19:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
18645 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18643 +++$+++ 18643 +++$+++ 2006-08-12 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.155435300E09 +++$+++ According to the project page, the preferred images are front 3\/4 view, not blurry, not dirty. If you think the comparison of the two back ends is especially important, by all means keep it on the page (in smaller size, maybe side-by-side 175-pxs) but don't demand that no one else put up images that better meet the set requirements. And if this comparison is so important, why not mention it in the article?  +++$+++ :According to the project page, the preferred images are front 3/4 view, not blurry, not dirty. If you think the comparison of the two back ends is especially important, by all means keep it on the page (in smaller size, maybe side-by-side 175-pxs) but don't demand that no one else put up images that better meet the set requirements. And if this comparison is so important, why not mention it in the article? [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 19:15, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
18646 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18643 +++$+++ 18645 +++$+++ 2006-08-12 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.155439740E09 +++$+++ Moreover, no guideline says that all images should be self-taken. There are many enthusiast clubs or even individual enthusiastic members who spent a lot of time to make truly superb pics of their favorite cars. They are often very happy to share the photos of their beloved cars to have them featured on WP, where everybody can see them. Just browse the internet and you can probably find some good quality privately-made pics of these design features. All you need to do is contact the owners and ask for releasing them into public domain!  +++$+++ ::Moreover, no guideline says that all images should be self-taken. There are many enthusiast clubs or even individual enthusiastic members who spent a lot of time to make truly superb pics of their favorite cars. They are often very happy to share the photos of their beloved cars to have them featured on WP, where everybody can see them. Just browse the internet and you can probably find some good quality privately-made pics of these design features. All you need to do is contact the owners and ask for releasing them into public domain! [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 20:29, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

18647 +++$+++ Crazytales56297 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-18 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.155959340E09 +++$+++ Great job on taking all those photos of automobiles! I'm trying to be a better automobile photographer; not having much success though. Check my upload log here and on commons (cchan199206 there) for examples of ym photos. I don't have a great camera; it that the problem? Thnaks, <!--[[User:Where\/sigContract]];Crazytales56297--><font face=\"Verdana\">~&nbsp;<b>[[user:Crazytales56297\/B0x3n|<font color=\"#8000ff\">c.<\/font>]]&nbsp; +++$+++ Great job on taking all those photos of automobiles! I'm trying to be a better automobile photographer; not having much success though. Check my upload log here and on commons (cchan199206 there) for examples of ym photos. I don't have a great camera; it that the problem? Thnaks, <!--[[User:Where/sigContract]];Crazytales56297--><font face="Verdana">~&nbsp;<b>[[user:Crazytales56297/B0x3n|<font color="#8000ff">c.</font>]]&nbsp;[[user:crazytales56297|<font color="#ff00ff">tales</font>]]</b>&nbsp;[[user talk:crazytales56297|<sup><font color="404040">*talk*</font></sup>]]</font><!--ESC:Crazytales56297--> 20:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
18648 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18647 +++$+++ 18647 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.155960300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the compliments. There's no real trick that I've found to taking quick pictures, just try to be as physically close as possible to the car, take pictures only in good lighting, and don't rush yourself in getting the best possible angle. I don't know what camera you have, but mine isn't anything special (it's an Olympus digital, a few years old and not especially expensive).  +++$+++ :Thanks for the compliments. There's no real trick that I've found to taking quick pictures, just try to be as physically close as possible to the car, take pictures only in good lighting, and don't rush yourself in getting the best possible angle. I don't know what camera you have, but mine isn't anything special (it's an Olympus digital, a few years old and not especially expensive). [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 21:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
18649 +++$+++ Crazytales56297 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18647 +++$+++ 18648 +++$+++ 2006-08-19 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.156038660E09 +++$+++ Mine's a DXG DVC305. Minor brand, doesn't take great photos. I try to photograph cars from a front 3\/4 view, sidewalk side because where I d most of my photography is of cars parked streetside. <!--[[User:Where\/sigContract]];Crazytales56297--><font face=\"Verdana\">~&nbsp;<b>[[user:Crazytales56297\/B0x3n|<font color=\"#8000ff\">c.<\/font>]]&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Mine's a DXG DVC305. Minor brand, doesn't take great photos. I try to photograph cars from a front 3/4 view, sidewalk side because where I d most of my photography is of cars parked streetside. <!--[[User:Where/sigContract]];Crazytales56297--><font face="Verdana">~&nbsp;<b>[[user:Crazytales56297/B0x3n|<font color="#8000ff">c.</font>]]&nbsp;[[user:crazytales56297|<font color="#ff00ff">tales</font>]]</b>&nbsp;[[user talk:crazytales56297|<font color="404040"><small>\\<b>tk</b>//</small></font>]]</font><!--ESC:Crazytales56297--> 18:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

18650 +++$+++ Run! +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-23 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.156362000E09 +++$+++ {{User:Run!\/GA}}  +++$+++ {{User:Run!/GA}} [[User:Run!|<font size="-2" color="white" style="background:red">&nbsp;'''-- Run!'''&nbsp;</font>]] 12:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
18651 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18650 +++$+++ 18650 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.156362840E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that. I noticed right after I put it up, but it wouldn't let me put up an edit summary without actually changing something.  +++$+++ :Sorry about that. I noticed right after I put it up, but it wouldn't let me put up an edit summary without actually changing something. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 12:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

18652 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-24 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.156483140E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just wanted to reply to the latter part of your post here, as it was rather unrelated with the Vedette. Well, as the evidence of the Vedette itself shows, the criteria are applied quite liberally, though I still believe one should adhere with the ones listed at [[WP:WIAGA]]. As concerns the Aura, I did not want to review it formally, as I guess there might be a bit too much of a conflict of itnerest, but I can give you my informal review on its talk page (provided I want fall asleep on my keyboard in a moment), but in general the article has one major disqualifying flaw - a total lack of references. Do browse some Good and Featured articles for examples of good referencing (if anything seems off to you, or like an example of an easy way out, that means you have come accross an article that somehow got through and it's not a good example). Regards,  +++$+++ Hi, I just wanted to reply to the latter part of your post here, as it was rather unrelated with the Vedette. Well, as the evidence of the Vedette itself shows, the criteria are applied quite liberally, though I still believe one should adhere with the ones listed at [[WP:WIAGA]]. As concerns the Aura, I did not want to review it formally, as I guess there might be a bit too much of a conflict of itnerest, but I can give you my informal review on its talk page (provided I want fall asleep on my keyboard in a moment), but in general the article has one major disqualifying flaw - a total lack of references. Do browse some Good and Featured articles for examples of good referencing (if anything seems off to you, or like an example of an easy way out, that means you have come accross an article that somehow got through and it's not a good example). Regards, [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 22:19, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
18653 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.156483740E09 +++$+++ Sounds good. You know what should be in the article more than I do. I was just replacing the fair use image, thought that what was there seemed well-written, and figured it couldn't hurt to nominate it.  +++$+++ :Sounds good. You know what should be in the article more than I do. I was just replacing the fair use image, thought that what was there seemed well-written, and figured it couldn't hurt to nominate it. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 22:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
18654 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18653 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.156488360E09 +++$+++ It seems as though the original author put some of his\/her references in the \"External Links\" section. I added a couple more. I hope that works out.  +++$+++ ::It seems as though the original author put some of his/her references in the "External Links" section. I added a couple more. I hope that works out. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 23:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
18655 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18654 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.156489800E09 +++$+++ Not really - sorry :( See the article's talk page :D  +++$+++ :::Not really - sorry :( See the article's talk page :D [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 00:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
18656 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.156490220E09 +++$+++ I was also a little disappointed with how the pictures turned out. I grabbed them quickly while the salesman was getting the keys and Xeroxing my license, so I'm not crushed by the criticism of this fine art. They're definitely serviceable in my opinion though, even the on-stand Aura.   +++$+++ :I was also a little disappointed with how the pictures turned out. I grabbed them quickly while the salesman was getting the keys and Xeroxing my license, so I'm not crushed by the criticism of this fine art. They're definitely serviceable in my opinion though, even the on-stand Aura.  [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 00:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
18657 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18656 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.156491720E09 +++$+++ BTW, I would really try to check out the resolution thing about your camera. Somehow the pictures appear to be quite low-res, or grainy, at least when put throught the WP image display engine. I believe there is a way to make the camera fix it. I am saying that, because I am seeing people having gripes about this thing adversely affecting the quality of your, otherwise usually really good, photos.  +++$+++ ::BTW, I would really try to check out the resolution thing about your camera. Somehow the pictures appear to be quite low-res, or grainy, at least when put throught the WP image display engine. I believe there is a way to make the camera fix it. I am saying that, because I am seeing people having gripes about this thing adversely affecting the quality of your, otherwise usually really good, photos. [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 00:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
18658 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18657 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.156492200E09 +++$+++ Back on topic, failing an article for not having inline citations is clearly against the Wikipedia guidelines. \"The citation of [the article's] sources is essential, and the use of inline citations is desirable, although not mandatory.\"  +++$+++ :::Back on topic, failing an article for not having inline citations is clearly against the Wikipedia guidelines. "The citation of [the article's] sources is essential, and the use of inline citations is desirable, although not mandatory." [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 00:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
18659 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18658 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.156492620E09 +++$+++ Concerning inline citations, discuss with people who do so. It is usually coupled with other reasons, and reasons for failing this article are present in abundance, so I don't believe it will be failed because of that. Still, some statements, such as the one about \"the lacklustre sales of the L-Series\", would be strongly recommended to carry an inline citation IMHO. As concerns the pics, perhaps it's not resolution, I can't put my finger on it... But there is something about your pics... Maybe it's the brightness thing... Or there is this \"remove spots\" or whatever you call it option in the photo processing software... Do compare the Aura pic with the ones in e.g. the [[Oldsmobile Intrigue]] article (which, qualitywise, are one of the better if you'd ask me, not to say yours aren't good either).  +++$+++ ::::Concerning inline citations, discuss with people who do so. It is usually coupled with other reasons, and reasons for failing this article are present in abundance, so I don't believe it will be failed because of that. Still, some statements, such as the one about "the lacklustre sales of the L-Series", would be strongly recommended to carry an inline citation IMHO. As concerns the pics, perhaps it's not resolution, I can't put my finger on it... But there is something about your pics... Maybe it's the brightness thing... Or there is this "remove spots" or whatever you call it option in the photo processing software... Do compare the Aura pic with the ones in e.g. the [[Oldsmobile Intrigue]] article (which, qualitywise, are one of the better if you'd ask me, not to say yours aren't good either). [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 00:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
18660 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18657 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.156493040E09 +++$+++ The Intrigue pic does have a much higher resolution than the Aura pic, maybe that's it. The Aura's black paint against a dark window probably wasn't all that helpful either. But I don't think it was that bad of an image, in appearance or in quality. Maybe I'm too biased. But if you can pinpoint a specific image quality problem, I'd obviously appreciate it.  +++$+++ :::The Intrigue pic does have a much higher resolution than the Aura pic, maybe that's it. The Aura's black paint against a dark window probably wasn't all that helpful either. But I don't think it was that bad of an image, in appearance or in quality. Maybe I'm too biased. But if you can pinpoint a specific image quality problem, I'd obviously appreciate it. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 01:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
18661 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18660 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.156494300E09 +++$+++ As I said, I can't. And actually, the Aura here is quite good (save for the unfortunate lighting\/reflection combination, but that has nothing to do with the camera), I meant your photos in general - e.g. the other Aura, or [[:Image:Honda-Accord-wagon.jpg|this Accord]]. Compare with Robert's [[:Image:1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS.jpg|Monte Carlo]], it is much less \"grainy\" to my eyes, even if the resolution seems comparable (though it might not be and then there's the problem). Though now I have looked at a number of other pics and perhaps I'm just grumbling - this all becomes too blurred for me to draw a straight line (though higher resolution helps of course). Just forget it and aim at good shots with fair lighting :D  +++$+++ ::::As I said, I can't. And actually, the Aura here is quite good (save for the unfortunate lighting/reflection combination, but that has nothing to do with the camera), I meant your photos in general - e.g. the other Aura, or [[:Image:Honda-Accord-wagon.jpg|this Accord]]. Compare with Robert's [[:Image:1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS.jpg|Monte Carlo]], it is much less "grainy" to my eyes, even if the resolution seems comparable (though it might not be and then there's the problem). Though now I have looked at a number of other pics and perhaps I'm just grumbling - this all becomes too blurred for me to draw a straight line (though higher resolution helps of course). Just forget it and aim at good shots with fair lighting :D [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 01:25, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
18662 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18657 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.156496160E09 +++$+++ And I have no problem with the discussion being here. I couldn't care less where it is as long as I can find it (and the little yellow notification box made that easy).  +++$+++ :::And I have no problem with the discussion being here. I couldn't care less where it is as long as I can find it (and the little yellow notification box made that easy). [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 01:56, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
18663 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18662 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.156496880E09 +++$+++ Which is why I mentioned contacting other people, as this might be a better way of procuring many good-quality pictures than trying to make all of them yourself. After all, that's your name which appears as the uploader :D E.g. concerning this hopeless Civic case, there might be some enthusiast who, by some slim chance, did not rice out his\/her old Civic, but rather kept it clean and in good condition and made some really good pics of it. I believe finding such Civic in your area might be hard, but finding such person over the Internet might be easier. That said, it's 4 AM here and I am probably talking absolute rubbish, I don't even want to read that. Good boo!  +++$+++ ::::Which is why I mentioned contacting other people, as this might be a better way of procuring many good-quality pictures than trying to make all of them yourself. After all, that's your name which appears as the uploader :D E.g. concerning this hopeless Civic case, there might be some enthusiast who, by some slim chance, did not rice out his/her old Civic, but rather kept it clean and in good condition and made some really good pics of it. I believe finding such Civic in your area might be hard, but finding such person over the Internet might be easier. That said, it's 4 AM here and I am probably talking absolute rubbish, I don't even want to read that. Good boo! [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 02:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
18664 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18657 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.156497360E09 +++$+++ But the way I see it, there's no point in participating on Wikipedia if it's not enjoyable, and talking to Civic fans isn't really something I tend to enjoy. If parking-lot images aren't welcome, let me know and save me time and effort, but if I'm putting up images I'm putting up my own, and that's where cars tend to be concentrated.  +++$+++ :::But the way I see it, there's no point in participating on Wikipedia if it's not enjoyable, and talking to Civic fans isn't really something I tend to enjoy. If parking-lot images aren't welcome, let me know and save me time and effort, but if I'm putting up images I'm putting up my own, and that's where cars tend to be concentrated. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 02:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
18665 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18664 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.156526460E09 +++$+++ Just do as you please, I was tired and not really conscious when writing that. Perhaps the photos people have issues with were not inserted by you. Have a good day!  +++$+++ ::::Just do as you please, I was tired and not really conscious when writing that. Perhaps the photos people have issues with were not inserted by you. Have a good day! [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 10:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
18666 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18652 +++$+++ 18657 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.156532700E09 +++$+++ If there have been complaints, I'd like to know about it. No one has brought it up to me except a fair use uploader who didn't see the value in free photos.  +++$+++ :::If there have been complaints, I'd like to know about it. No one has brought it up to me except a fair use uploader who didn't see the value in free photos. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 12:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

280797 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.165475820E09 +++$+++ It's ok.  I note, however, that your edit was \"The article ... appeared\", not \"article has been mentioned\", as you write above.  Details, precision and accuracy count.  The wording you actually used would be incorrect, and the wording you think you used would be better, but I'm going to leave my page the way it is for the time being.  +++$+++ It's ok.  I note, however, that your edit was "The article ... appeared", not "article has been mentioned", as you write above.  Details, precision and accuracy count.  The wording you actually used would be incorrect, and the wording you think you used would be better, but I'm going to leave my page the way it is for the time being. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 23:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
280798 +++$+++ Male1979 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280797 +++$+++ 280797 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.165617780E09 +++$+++ Point taken about \"has been mentioned.\" Thanks.  +++$+++ :Point taken about "has been mentioned." Thanks. [[User:Male1979|Ben]]  <sup>[[User_talk:Male1979|T]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Male1979|C]] </sub> 14:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

265253 +++$+++ Kmhkmh +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-14 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.273867320E09 +++$+++ Not that mind visually combining press coverage regarding the same topic, but the box you've used seems somewhat inappropriate or misleading to readers at least. All the articles are about a common topic or incident in WP (the argument regarding the alleged porn pictures), but they are '''not''' about a common WP-page as the box\/template suggests. Regards-- +++$+++ Not that mind visually combining press coverage regarding the same topic, but the box you've used seems somewhat inappropriate or misleading to readers at least. All the articles are about a common topic or incident in WP (the argument regarding the alleged porn pictures), but they are '''not''' about a common WP-page as the box/template suggests. Regards--[[User:Kmhkmh|Kmhkmh]] ([[User talk:Kmhkmh|talk]]) 13:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
265254 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265253 +++$+++ 265253 +++$+++ 2010-05-14 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.273872180E09 +++$+++ I have noticed this myself. The template has been in use on the Press Coverage page since 2007. I think we need a new template or  a switch in this one to adjust the wording. I have raised this on the Pressmulti Template talk page  . see [[Template_talk:Press#Use_in_Wikipedia_Press_Coverage]].  +++$+++ :I have noticed this myself. The template has been in use on the Press Coverage page since 2007. I think we need a new template or  a switch in this one to adjust the wording. I have raised this on the Pressmulti Template talk page  . see [[Template_talk:Press#Use_in_Wikipedia_Press_Coverage]]. [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]] ([[User talk:Lumos3#top|talk]]) 14:23, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
265255 +++$+++ Kmhkmh +++$+++ Lumos3 +++$+++ 265253 +++$+++ 265254 +++$+++ 2010-05-15 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.273910460E09 +++$+++ Alright - thanks.-- +++$+++ ::Alright - thanks.--[[User:Kmhkmh|Kmhkmh]] ([[User talk:Kmhkmh|talk]]) 01:01, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

280801 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-11 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.165909980E09 +++$+++ \u2014  +++$+++ — [[User:Hu|Hu]] 23:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
280802 +++$+++ Psychohistorian +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280801 +++$+++ 280801 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.165959540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up on that.  It should surprise me that someone would lodge an official complaint about me and fail to notify me that they've done so.- +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up on that.  It should surprise me that someone would lodge an official complaint about me and fail to notify me that they've done so.-[[User:Psychohistorian|Psychohistorian]] 13:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

542947 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-31 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.296465840E09 +++$+++ <undent> [[:File:Mel Atkey.jpg]] and [[:File:Two snails producing offspring.JPG]] seem OK to move. The others have all been tagged\/nominated.  +++$+++ <undent> [[:File:Mel Atkey.jpg]] and [[:File:Two snails producing offspring.JPG]] seem OK to move. The others have all been tagged/nominated. [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 01:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
542948 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542947 +++$+++ 542947 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.296528840E09 +++$+++ Moved. That was fast... If all categories can be moved that fast we can soon nuke all files on Commons :-) -- +++$+++ :Moved. That was fast... If all categories can be moved that fast we can soon nuke all files on Commons :-) --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 18:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
542949 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542947 +++$+++ 542948 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.296537960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help!  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the help! [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 21:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

542950 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542950 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-01 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.296624360E09 +++$+++ I have (finally!) moved out all the files that used the license {{tl|GFDL-retouched}}, and now I'm wondering what to do with the license itself. We probably don't want anyone using it on any new uploads, because it uses the old \"with disclaimers\" version of the GFDL. But I don't know if we can just change the license template - what if old files that used it are undeleted or copied back here from Commons?  +++$+++ I have (finally!) moved out all the files that used the license {{tl|GFDL-retouched}}, and now I'm wondering what to do with the license itself. We probably don't want anyone using it on any new uploads, because it uses the old "with disclaimers" version of the GFDL. But I don't know if we can just change the license template - what if old files that used it are undeleted or copied back here from Commons? [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 21:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
542951 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542950 +++$+++ 542950 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.296625260E09 +++$+++ I think it could be changed. But I think it would be a good idea to add a note on [[Template talk:GFDL-retouched]] about the change. -- +++$+++ :I think it could be changed. But I think it would be a good idea to add a note on [[Template talk:GFDL-retouched]] about the change. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 21:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
542952 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542950 +++$+++ 542951 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.296625860E09 +++$+++ OK, done.  +++$+++ ::OK, done. [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 21:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
542953 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542950 +++$+++ 542951 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.296684660E09 +++$+++ Perfect! So what is next? ;-) -- +++$+++ ::Perfect! So what is next? ;-) --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 14:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

18667 +++$+++ Bull-Doser +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18667 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-09 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.157788200E09 +++$+++ Last time you uploaded images to Wikipedia was last week.  I continue to upload pictures of cars, BTW. --  +++$+++ Last time you uploaded images to Wikipedia was last week.  I continue to upload pictures of cars, BTW. -- [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]] 00:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
18668 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18667 +++$+++ 18667 +++$+++ 2006-09-09 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.157789580E09 +++$+++ There's been some bad weather in DC the last few times I've been in big parking lots. I have a few shots, waiting to be uploaded, but I'll be waiting for a large group this weekend.  +++$+++ :There's been some bad weather in DC the last few times I've been in big parking lots. I have a few shots, waiting to be uploaded, but I'll be waiting for a large group this weekend. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 01:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

18669 +++$+++ Bull-Doser +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-11 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.157965800E09 +++$+++ Willing to take car pictures overseas, just like me when I was in the [[Caribbean]]? --  +++$+++ Willing to take car pictures overseas, just like me when I was in the [[Caribbean]]? -- [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]] 02:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
18670 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18669 +++$+++ 18669 +++$+++ 2006-09-11 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.157996700E09 +++$+++ When I travel to interesting places, I like to go without a camera. When I'm paying that much to be somewhere, I don't want taking pictures to get in the way of the experience. Pictures of traffic are the lowest priority.  +++$+++ :When I travel to interesting places, I like to go without a camera. When I'm paying that much to be somewhere, I don't want taking pictures to get in the way of the experience. Pictures of traffic are the lowest priority. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 10:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

18671 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18671 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-12 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.158081660E09 +++$+++ I noticed you latest edit to [[Mercury Sable]]. Now, I hva enoticed this in many pages. Instead of taking pictures of cars that already have free images on their page, why don't you try focusing your efforts to taking images for car pages that need them, ok?  +++$+++ I noticed you latest edit to [[Mercury Sable]]. Now, I hva enoticed this in many pages. Instead of taking pictures of cars that already have free images on their page, why don't you try focusing your efforts to taking images for car pages that need them, ok? [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 10:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
18672 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18671 +++$+++ 18671 +++$+++ 2006-09-12 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.158083880E09 +++$+++ I get what I can. If there were something better parked there, I would have taken it. But if I think I can, there's no reason I would want to try and improve over one of my previous pictures. And I'd say the new Sable photo is a better angle than what I had put up before.  +++$+++ :I get what I can. If there were something better parked there, I would have taken it. But if I think I can, there's no reason I would want to try and improve over one of my previous pictures. And I'd say the new Sable photo is a better angle than what I had put up before. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 10:58, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
18673 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18671 +++$+++ 18672 +++$+++ 2006-09-12 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.158084360E09 +++$+++ I agree with that. THe angle is better, and the image is clearer.  +++$+++ ::I agree with that. THe angle is better, and the image is clearer. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 11:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

18674 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.159149660E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I [[User:gerdbrendel|Brendel]] hereby give you IFCAR the photographers barnstar for your great work and effort to illustrate automobile article here on Wikipedia. Your edits and photographs have added to the quality and integrity of our articles. Such hard work needs to be recognized. So, keep up the good work and happy editing! <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I [[User:gerdbrendel|Brendel]] hereby give you IFCAR the photographers barnstar for your great work and effort to illustrate automobile article here on Wikipedia. Your edits and photographs have added to the quality and integrity of our articles. Such hard work needs to be recognized. So, keep up the good work and happy editing! <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 19:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
18675 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18674 +++$+++ 18674 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.159150680E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 19:18, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

542963 +++$+++ Magog the Ogre +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542963 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-21 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.303376880E09 +++$+++ See: [[:Category:Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons as of 15 April 2011]]. If I remember correctly, you said you planned on cleaning up after the bot tagged the images; is that still the case?  +++$+++ See: [[:Category:Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons as of 15 April 2011]]. If I remember correctly, you said you planned on cleaning up after the bot tagged the images; is that still the case? [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 02:08, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
542964 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542963 +++$+++ 542963 +++$+++ 2011-04-21 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.303425900E09 +++$+++ Oh you found them :-) It was a requested move and some user told me he would (help) check the files if I moved them. My plan was to wait a few days and see what happens. After that I would see if it is possible to clean up with my bot. If not I guess I have some work to do :-) If you know any users that know about military badges it would be nice with some assistance to make sure the files end in the right categories. -- +++$+++ :Oh you found them :-) It was a requested move and some user told me he would (help) check the files if I moved them. My plan was to wait a few days and see what happens. After that I would see if it is possible to clean up with my bot. If not I guess I have some work to do :-) If you know any users that know about military badges it would be nice with some assistance to make sure the files end in the right categories. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 15:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

280821 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280821 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-21 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.166708580E09 +++$+++ Bolding of important text is a signal that is independent of the language.  You claimed you did not see it.  We can't be held responsible for other people's language skills.  Stop taking this so personally.  It is not personal!  Just accept that \"something happened\", and learn from the experience.  As far as I can tell, I did not delete any of your comments, but if you can point to it or simply want to restate it, go ahead, just in case I might have been in error.  Technically, editors can delete most things from their Talk pages except things like notices and warnings from Admins, as I can see you know from the way you have edited your talk page, removing the Welcome message with the useful links that I left there, your privilege.  However, I tend not to delete comments here. I did not claim you write nonsensically, I claimed that the content you wrote was nonsense.  It is not an attack on you, it is an attack on the content.  An important distinction.  I'm sorry if English is not your first language, I have no way of knowing that, and English is the language of this Encyclopedia, so again, don't take it personally!  You claim you recreated an article that had been deleted, probably not a good idea without discussing it first.  But you do need to relax a little and realize that I did not realize that you hadn't been given the links to read that are in the Welcome message I gave to you. Live and learn, this is an encyclopedia, not myspace, so don't think we are attack you or your friend, biographical articles have to be about notable people or they get deleted.  +++$+++ Bolding of important text is a signal that is independent of the language.  You claimed you did not see it.  We can't be held responsible for other people's language skills.  Stop taking this so personally.  It is not personal!  Just accept that "something happened", and learn from the experience.  As far as I can tell, I did not delete any of your comments, but if you can point to it or simply want to restate it, go ahead, just in case I might have been in error.  Technically, editors can delete most things from their Talk pages except things like notices and warnings from Admins, as I can see you know from the way you have edited your talk page, removing the Welcome message with the useful links that I left there, your privilege.  However, I tend not to delete comments here. I did not claim you write nonsensically, I claimed that the content you wrote was nonsense.  It is not an attack on you, it is an attack on the content.  An important distinction.  I'm sorry if English is not your first language, I have no way of knowing that, and English is the language of this Encyclopedia, so again, don't take it personally!  You claim you recreated an article that had been deleted, probably not a good idea without discussing it first.  But you do need to relax a little and realize that I did not realize that you hadn't been given the links to read that are in the Welcome message I gave to you. Live and learn, this is an encyclopedia, not myspace, so don't think we are attack you or your friend, biographical articles have to be about notable people or they get deleted. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 05:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
280822 +++$+++ Jim Douglas +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280821 +++$+++ 280821 +++$+++ 2006-12-21 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.166709300E09 +++$+++ Even making every possible allowance for difficulties with English, the first version of that page was a {{template|db-attack}}.  With the attack parts stripped out, it's clearly a {{template|db-bio}}. --  +++$+++ :Even making every possible allowance for difficulties with English, the first version of that page was a {{template|db-attack}}.  With the attack parts stripped out, it's clearly a {{template|db-bio}}. -- [[User:Jim Douglas|Jim Douglas]] [[User talk:Jim Douglas|<sup><font color="green">(talk)</font></sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jim Douglas|<sub><font color="gray">(contribs)</font></sub>]] 05:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

18678 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-02 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.159846320E09 +++$+++ Hi, I use 1280 X 1024 resolution, so I may be seeing a problem that you don't have. I am trying to fix the arrangement of pics on the TC page, so that everything works with my resolution and all the pics are in their corresponding section. I like your new TC pic better and will included ASAP. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ Hi, I use 1280 X 1024 resolution, so I may be seeing a problem that you don't have. I am trying to fix the arrangement of pics on the TC page, so that everything works with my resolution and all the pics are in their corresponding section. I like your new TC pic better and will included ASAP. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 20:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
18679 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18678 +++$+++ 18678 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.159959780E09 +++$+++ '''Update:''' Just to let you know, I fixed the line wrap and created a little gallery which includes the second '90 - '94 [[Town Car]] pic you took. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :'''Update:''' Just to let you know, I fixed the line wrap and created a little gallery which includes the second '90 - '94 [[Town Car]] pic you took. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 04:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

18680 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-07 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.160287380E09 +++$+++ Yeah, next time you are out takin pictures, please try to snap an image of a first and second generation Geo Metro. The images currently on the article are God-awful.  +++$+++ Yeah, next time you are out takin pictures, please try to snap an image of a first and second generation Geo Metro. The images currently on the article are God-awful. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 23:03, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
18681 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18680 +++$+++ 18680 +++$+++ 2006-10-08 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.160299920E09 +++$+++ Ok, I will look there. One with no hubcaps will be much better than the images we have so far. But if you can, see if you can find a one in pretty good whack to snap, teh article needs it.  +++$+++ :Ok, I will look there. One with no hubcaps will be much better than the images we have so far. But if you can, see if you can find a one in pretty good whack to snap, teh article needs it. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 02:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

542970 +++$+++ DanTD +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-14 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.305438420E09 +++$+++ If I see another image that was uploaded on Feburary 18, 2011, Feburary 19, 2011, or any other day on a category that's dead, I'll revive it regardless of how much trouble it may cause. I was hoping to find other images from those dates, before the cats were deleted again. Frankly I'm surprised that there are as many images that were uploaded into the commons without being tagged as such, but at this point I'm wondering if I ''should'' be surprised anymore. ---- +++$+++ If I see another image that was uploaded on Feburary 18, 2011, Feburary 19, 2011, or any other day on a category that's dead, I'll revive it regardless of how much trouble it may cause. I was hoping to find other images from those dates, before the cats were deleted again. Frankly I'm surprised that there are as many images that were uploaded into the commons without being tagged as such, but at this point I'm wondering if I ''should'' be surprised anymore. ----[[User:DanTD|DanTD]] ([[User talk:DanTD|talk]]) 22:47, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
542971 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542970 +++$+++ 542970 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.305472620E09 +++$+++ Yeah. The problem can arise if a photo is uploaded to xx-wiki. Later someone copies it to en-wiki. Later someone moved the file from xx-wiki to Commons without knowing that it is on en-wiki. Then Multichill's bot will tag the file on en-wiki. And ofcourse someone may just move a file from en-wiki to Commons without tagging. We just have to check files from time to time and delete the files on en-wiki. -- +++$+++ :Yeah. The problem can arise if a photo is uploaded to xx-wiki. Later someone copies it to en-wiki. Later someone moved the file from xx-wiki to Commons without knowing that it is on en-wiki. Then Multichill's bot will tag the file on en-wiki. And ofcourse someone may just move a file from en-wiki to Commons without tagging. We just have to check files from time to time and delete the files on en-wiki. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 08:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
542972 +++$+++ Magog the Ogre +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542970 +++$+++ 542971 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.305475320E09 +++$+++ If you think it's bad here, you should check out ja.wp. I found images today from ja.wp that were uploaded to commons ''three years ago'' and remain untagged.  +++$+++ ::If you think it's bad here, you should check out ja.wp. I found images today from ja.wp that were uploaded to commons ''three years ago'' and remain untagged. [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 09:02, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
542973 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542970 +++$+++ 542972 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.305488760E09 +++$+++ We just need to run a bot there :-) -- +++$+++ :::We just need to run a bot there :-) --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 12:46, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
542974 +++$+++ Magog the Ogre +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542970 +++$+++ 542971 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.307698140E09 +++$+++ Who's the Dutch guy who runs the bot here? Surely we could recruit him to do it there. I'm too lazy to do it myself, but the place to start is [[:ja:Wikipedia:Help for Non-Japanese Speakers]].  +++$+++ ::Who's the Dutch guy who runs the bot here? Surely we could recruit him to do it there. I'm too lazy to do it myself, but the place to start is [[:ja:Wikipedia:Help for Non-Japanese Speakers]]. [[User:Magog the Ogre|Magog the Ogre]] ([[User talk:Magog the Ogre|talk]]) 02:29, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
542975 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ MGA73 +++$+++ 542970 +++$+++ 542974 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.307766120E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I made a notice there. Lets see what they say. -- +++$+++ :::Thank you. I made a notice there. Lets see what they say. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73#top|talk]]) 21:22, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

18684 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-22 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.161509160E09 +++$+++ Cool, My dad drives a Dodge Caravan! Same gen too.  +++$+++ Cool, My dad drives a Dodge Caravan! Same gen too. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 02:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
18685 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18684 +++$+++ 18684 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163570760E09 +++$+++ Bull-Doser, quit being a petty whiner.  +++$+++ :Bull-Doser, quit being a petty whiner. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 22:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
18686 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18684 +++$+++ 18685 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.163580960E09 +++$+++ I was somewhat confused by the fact that you replaced it with your own on the page. Aside from their being a person in yours, it showed the details of the car more clearly. I took it back off, not you.  +++$+++ ::I was somewhat confused by the fact that you replaced it with your own on the page. Aside from their being a person in yours, it showed the details of the car more clearly. I took it back off, not you. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 00:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

280830 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280830 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-25 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.167058320E09 +++$+++ I recommend it highly for all articles with a scientific or academic orientation.  Explanations: [[Wikipedia:Harvard referencing]], [[Template:Harvard reference]].  +++$+++ I recommend it highly for all articles with a scientific or academic orientation.  Explanations: [[Wikipedia:Harvard referencing]], [[Template:Harvard reference]]. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 06:52, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
280831 +++$+++ WilliamKF +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280830 +++$+++ 280830 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.168243320E09 +++$+++ Could you help with doing Harvard references in this article: [[Planetary Nebula M2-9]].  In particular, how do I do a small cite so that the infobox does not get bloated?  Also, is there an et al form for when there are many authors?  Finally, what to do if there is no author like when it is a press release or a database query at SIMBAD?  Thanks.   +++$+++ : Could you help with doing Harvard references in this article: [[Planetary Nebula M2-9]].  In particular, how do I do a small cite so that the infobox does not get bloated?  Also, is there an et al form for when there are many authors?  Finally, what to do if there is no author like when it is a press release or a database query at SIMBAD?  Thanks.  [[User:WilliamKF|WilliamKF]] 00:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

280833 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-08 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.168252620E09 +++$+++ I've edited the article.  Thanks for introducing the Harvard reference system into that article.  I used the standard reference system as footnotes to keep the infobox compact.  Looks like you got the ''et al'' working.  For SIMBAD, I fudged it by calling SIMBAD the author.  +++$+++ I've edited the article.  Thanks for introducing the Harvard reference system into that article.  I used the standard reference system as footnotes to keep the infobox compact.  Looks like you got the ''et al'' working.  For SIMBAD, I fudged it by calling SIMBAD the author. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 02:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
280834 +++$+++ WilliamKF +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280833 +++$+++ 280833 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.168260720E09 +++$+++ Could you look again?  I've added notes a, b and wonder if that should be changed.  Also, why the change to external links to use &amp; instead of bullets?  And, I thought style guide says no space before the footnote.  Also, if you are willing to take a look at [[Protoplanetary nebula]] which I added Harvard too, that would be nice.  Thanks again.   +++$+++ : Could you look again?  I've added notes a, b and wonder if that should be changed.  Also, why the change to external links to use &amp; instead of bullets?  And, I thought style guide says no space before the footnote.  Also, if you are willing to take a look at [[Protoplanetary nebula]] which I added Harvard too, that would be nice.  Thanks again.  [[User:WilliamKF|WilliamKF]] 04:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

18690 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-28 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.167295260E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I got his talk page on my watchlist also, as I keep an eye on teh guy, because before you came, (and he used teh account [[User:Take Me Higher]]), he was very arrogant, he took ALL his images of poorly exposed and beat up cars from the back with his finger in the shot, and he would never respond to our comments, we even created an RfC for him which he again ignored. It took us finally sticking our foot up his ass to get him to finally snap pctures of cars from the front, and those were even of bad quality. And most of the images he uploads today are of bad quality. And well, I guess he considers himself \"the original\" (Of snapping cars on the street and stuff for free pics) and we are just \"COpycats\". Though then aain, we take images that we can use, he is just a pain. It is still laughable how bad some of his pics were. There was one of a [[Dodge Dynasty|Chrysler Dynasty]], where it was from the back, all four doors were open, it was snowing, and a lady was loading her kids in the back, and she was staring into the camera thinking that he was some kind of rapist. I can even show you some of his early work that survived teh deletion hammer (I even got some on my hard drive) that I can use as examples of how bad his images actually were. But, as for teh whole \"F*** you\" message he left you, I am gonna post that on the AN, as I want to nip this in the bud now, before it escalades to the point where we got another [[User:Wiarthurhu|Wiarthurhu]] on out hands.  +++$+++ Yeah, I got his talk page on my watchlist also, as I keep an eye on teh guy, because before you came, (and he used teh account [[User:Take Me Higher]]), he was very arrogant, he took ALL his images of poorly exposed and beat up cars from the back with his finger in the shot, and he would never respond to our comments, we even created an RfC for him which he again ignored. It took us finally sticking our foot up his ass to get him to finally snap pctures of cars from the front, and those were even of bad quality. And most of the images he uploads today are of bad quality. And well, I guess he considers himself "the original" (Of snapping cars on the street and stuff for free pics) and we are just "COpycats". Though then aain, we take images that we can use, he is just a pain. It is still laughable how bad some of his pics were. There was one of a [[Dodge Dynasty|Chrysler Dynasty]], where it was from the back, all four doors were open, it was snowing, and a lady was loading her kids in the back, and she was staring into the camera thinking that he was some kind of rapist. I can even show you some of his early work that survived teh deletion hammer (I even got some on my hard drive) that I can use as examples of how bad his images actually were. But, as for teh whole "F*** you" message he left you, I am gonna post that on the AN, as I want to nip this in the bud now, before it escalades to the point where we got another [[User:Wiarthurhu|Wiarthurhu]] on out hands. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 00:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
18691 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18690 +++$+++ 18690 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.167296940E09 +++$+++ Well, if you look [[User talk:Take Me Higher|here]] or [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Take Me Higher|Here]], you will be able to see that he was a real problem before you joined. It took us sticking our foot up his butt before he finally started taking pictures from the front. And when it comes to the dealers, I just simply ask them for permission to take the images of cars, and they are usually alright with it (THat's how I got the images of those cars in that showroom)  +++$+++ :Well, if you look [[User talk:Take Me Higher|here]] or [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Take Me Higher|Here]], you will be able to see that he was a real problem before you joined. It took us sticking our foot up his butt before he finally started taking pictures from the front. And when it comes to the dealers, I just simply ask them for permission to take the images of cars, and they are usually alright with it (THat's how I got the images of those cars in that showroom) [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 01:09, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
18692 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18690 +++$+++ 18691 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.167297180E09 +++$+++ Ahh, I see. Well, with how Bull-Doser works, it gradually gets worse. So, he won't just stop with the f-bomb, it will just keep escalating, so that is why I brought it to the AN, so I can prevent this from becoming a real problem.  +++$+++ ::Ahh, I see. Well, with how Bull-Doser works, it gradually gets worse. So, he won't just stop with the f-bomb, it will just keep escalating, so that is why I brought it to the AN, so I can prevent this from becoming a real problem. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 01:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

542979 +++$+++ ApolloBoy +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 542979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-30 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.135934700E09 +++$+++ Hi there, I saw all the changes you made to several articles about Lincolns, and I should tell you that when you are making small tables about a certain generation of a car, please integrate them into the main table at the top of the page. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Hi there, I saw all the changes you made to several articles about Lincolns, and I should tell you that when you are making small tables about a certain generation of a car, please integrate them into the main table at the top of the page. Thanks. --[[User:ApolloBoy|ApolloBoy]] 01:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
542980 +++$+++ ApolloBoy +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 542979 +++$+++ 542979 +++$+++ 2005-12-30 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.135939920E09 +++$+++ I see your point, but it's generally better to have one table on the side than a bunch of small ones; it just makes an article look smoother and easier to read. -- +++$+++ :I see your point, but it's generally better to have one table on the side than a bunch of small ones; it just makes an article look smoother and easier to read. --[[User:ApolloBoy|ApolloBoy]] 02:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
542981 +++$+++ ApolloBoy +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 542979 +++$+++ 542980 +++$+++ 2005-12-30 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.135959720E09 +++$+++ I see. BTW, when putting an image in a table, do not use thumbnail or alignment tags (i.e. \"|thumb|\", \"|right|\"), as they are not needed. -- +++$+++ ::I see. BTW, when putting an image in a table, do not use thumbnail or alignment tags (i.e. "|thumb|", "|right|"), as they are not needed. --[[User:ApolloBoy|ApolloBoy]] 08:22, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
542982 +++$+++ ApolloBoy +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 542979 +++$+++ 542981 +++$+++ 2005-12-31 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.136029080E09 +++$+++ Oh, and other thing, when making a table, please put the name of the car below the picture of the car, not above it. If you look at other tables on car articles, you will notice that the majority of them do this. -- +++$+++ :::Oh, and other thing, when making a table, please put the name of the car below the picture of the car, not above it. If you look at other tables on car articles, you will notice that the majority of them do this. --[[User:ApolloBoy|ApolloBoy]] 03:38, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

18693 +++$+++ Bull-Doser +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18693 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-29 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.167444780E09 +++$+++ I like using [[Firefox]].  Ever use Firefox?  We want every car page to work thru Firefox & IE. --  +++$+++ I like using [[Firefox]].  Ever use Firefox?  We want every car page to work thru Firefox & IE. -- [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]] 18:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
18694 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18693 +++$+++ 18693 +++$+++ 2006-12-30 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.167470880E09 +++$+++ BD, after your \"Holiday greeting\", I don't think that you should touch his page ever again, especially with utterly stupid crap like this.  +++$+++ :BD, after your "Holiday greeting", I don't think that you should touch his page ever again, especially with utterly stupid crap like this. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 01:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

18695 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-13 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.168688160E09 +++$+++ I created the image. GT4 has a special feature called \"photo mode\", where you can take pictures of your cars. It also allows you to save them to a USB drive, adn upload them to your computer. Thus, the Image is mine.  +++$+++ I created the image. GT4 has a special feature called "photo mode", where you can take pictures of your cars. It also allows you to save them to a USB drive, adn upload them to your computer. Thus, the Image is mine. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 03:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
18696 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18695 +++$+++ 18695 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.168688460E09 +++$+++ No, if you are referring to teh game, no, I didn't create it. But if you are talking about the image, then yes.  +++$+++ :No, if you are referring to teh game, no, I didn't create it. But if you are talking about the image, then yes. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 03:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

527404 +++$+++ Ed Poor +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-06 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.162869780E09 +++$+++ If NPOV is dead, how can I mediate? Wikipedia had its chance, but (like the U.N.) has departed from its original ideals. God help it. -- +++$+++ If NPOV is dead, how can I mediate? Wikipedia had its chance, but (like the U.N.) has departed from its original ideals. God help it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Uncle Ed]] 19:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
527405 +++$+++ Ed Poor +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527404 +++$+++ 527404 +++$+++ 2006-11-06 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.162870380E09 +++$+++ I'm not afraid of backlash; I'm just wondering whether I can be effective. If you have confidence in my ability to perform a mediation, however, I'm willing to step up to the plate. When I *was* an active mediator, I had a (record-setting?) string of successes. -- +++$+++ :I'm not afraid of backlash; I'm just wondering whether I can be effective. If you have confidence in my ability to perform a mediation, however, I'm willing to step up to the plate. When I *was* an active mediator, I had a (record-setting?) string of successes. --[[User:Ed Poor|Uncle Ed]] 19:33, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
527406 +++$+++ Ed Poor +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527404 +++$+++ 527405 +++$+++ 2006-11-06 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.162873740E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Let me think this over now . . . ^_^ -- +++$+++ ::Thanks. Let me think this over now . . . ^_^ --[[User:Ed Poor|Uncle Ed]] 20:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

18699 +++$+++ Rarelibra +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18699 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-17 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.169101800E09 +++$+++ As for showing the DOD sticker in a photo - [[United States Army Forces Command|FORSCOM]] policy does not permit the display of many different items, including such stickers - to the point where you even have to turn them in to each installation as you leave or transfer. It is [[Operations security (OPSEC)|OPSEC]] not to display information that someone can use to distinguish (in this case) that particular vehicle and it's location, let alone the owner (who may be of importance to the 'enemy'). I say this in the best of interest. The military enforces many 'weird' things - such as prosecuting someone who kept posting videos of himself in his Navy uniform on YouTube without permission.  +++$+++ As for showing the DOD sticker in a photo - [[United States Army Forces Command|FORSCOM]] policy does not permit the display of many different items, including such stickers - to the point where you even have to turn them in to each installation as you leave or transfer. It is [[Operations security (OPSEC)|OPSEC]] not to display information that someone can use to distinguish (in this case) that particular vehicle and it's location, let alone the owner (who may be of importance to the 'enemy'). I say this in the best of interest. The military enforces many 'weird' things - such as prosecuting someone who kept posting videos of himself in his Navy uniform on YouTube without permission. [[User:Rarelibra|Rarelibra]] 22:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
18700 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18699 +++$+++ 18699 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.169182860E09 +++$+++ brougth this up with you before, like in teh case of [[Mercury Sable]], and now [[Lincoln Zephyr]]. I am with Rarelibra, and instead of replacing images in articles that already have good ones, instead put images in articles of cars that are unillustrated. There hav ebeen a few times when I felt that the image you put in place of th existing one was of worse quality of teh other one. Like with Lincoln Zephyr, yes, I know the pig stink you have over indoor pics, but the image you put in the place makes the article look drab.  +++$+++ : brougth this up with you before, like in teh case of [[Mercury Sable]], and now [[Lincoln Zephyr]]. I am with Rarelibra, and instead of replacing images in articles that already have good ones, instead put images in articles of cars that are unillustrated. There hav ebeen a few times when I felt that the image you put in place of th existing one was of worse quality of teh other one. Like with Lincoln Zephyr, yes, I know the pig stink you have over indoor pics, but the image you put in the place makes the article look drab. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 21:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
18701 +++$+++ Sable232 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18699 +++$+++ 18700 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.169212380E09 +++$+++ I'm with IFCAR on this, in all three cases. I have not seen a single instance where IFCAR has replaced an image with an inferior one. We finally got the image issues on [[Mercury Sable]] worked out now (it seems like we have discussed every single one on the talk page), the only images that we still need are of an early and a late Gen I. Then Rarelibra removed the silver car from the top infobox and put back that image of the green car, which I cannot understand. I think a photographer knows when one of his images is better than another. And short of discussing every image on the article's talk page, can't we just [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]? I have taken more car pictures than I can count, and I know which of mine are the best. IFCAR, I assume you do as well. -- +++$+++ ::I'm with IFCAR on this, in all three cases. I have not seen a single instance where IFCAR has replaced an image with an inferior one. We finally got the image issues on [[Mercury Sable]] worked out now (it seems like we have discussed every single one on the talk page), the only images that we still need are of an early and a late Gen I. Then Rarelibra removed the silver car from the top infobox and put back that image of the green car, which I cannot understand. I think a photographer knows when one of his images is better than another. And short of discussing every image on the article's talk page, can't we just [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]? I have taken more car pictures than I can count, and I know which of mine are the best. IFCAR, I assume you do as well. --[[User:Sable232|Sable232]] 05:13, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

542989 +++$+++ Sfoskett +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 542989 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-03 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.136332740E09 +++$+++ <nowiki>{{Lincoln vehicles}}<\/nowiki>  -- +++$+++ <nowiki>{{Lincoln vehicles}}</nowiki>  --[[User:Sfoskett|SFoskett]] 15:59, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
542990 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 542989 +++$+++ 542989 +++$+++ 2006-01-03 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.136345820E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for doing so.  +++$+++ :Thank you very much for doing so. [[User:Gerdbrendel|Gerdbrendel]] 19:37, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
542991 +++$+++ Sfoskett +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 542989 +++$+++ 542990 +++$+++ 2006-01-05 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.136520660E09 +++$+++ You can edit it by going to [[Template:Lincoln vehicles]] and clicking \"edit this page\", or simply by clicking this: {{edit|Template:Lincoln vehicles}}.  Looking forward to your future contributions!  -- +++$+++ ::You can edit it by going to [[Template:Lincoln vehicles]] and clicking "edit this page", or simply by clicking this: {{edit|Template:Lincoln vehicles}}.  Looking forward to your future contributions!  --[[User:Sfoskett|SFoskett]] 20:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

396333 +++$+++ Sverdrup +++$+++ Dmn +++$+++ 396333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-03-25 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.080277500E09 +++$+++ Yes, this is a nice illustration. I'd love to have a look of the code; is it possible for you to mail it to me?  +++$+++ Yes, this is a nice illustration. I'd love to have a look of the code; is it possible for you to mail it to me? [[User:Sverdrup|&mdash; Sverdrup]] 21:05, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)
396334 +++$+++ Sverdrup +++$+++ Dmn +++$+++ 396333 +++$+++ 396333 +++$+++ 2004-03-26 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.080330060E09 +++$+++ Oh, I see. I understand completely. I will be interested in May again, though. :-)  +++$+++ :Oh, I see. I understand completely. I will be interested in May again, though. :-) [[User:Sverdrup|&mdash; Sverdrup]] 11:41, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)

280848 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280848 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-28 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.167374940E09 +++$+++ I have not made four reverts.  There is no violation.  I have made only two reverts ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Science_fiction&action=history edit history of Science fiction article]).  I removed the tag, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Science_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=96997383] you reverted, I removed it again (first revert),[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Science_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=97011088] another editor restored it, I removed it again (second revert).[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Science_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=97014250]  It is not correct to claim [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Science_fiction&diff=96986128&oldid=96952482] as the first edit of the chain because it was part of a reasonable edit restoring fit external links, but even if you were about to successfully argue that in some detail, it would mean only three reverts, so there is still no violation.  +++$+++ I have not made four reverts.  There is no violation.  I have made only two reverts ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Science_fiction&action=history edit history of Science fiction article]).  I removed the tag, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Science_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=96997383] you reverted, I removed it again (first revert),[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Science_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=97011088] another editor restored it, I removed it again (second revert).[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Science_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=97014250]  It is not correct to claim [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Science_fiction&diff=96986128&oldid=96952482] as the first edit of the chain because it was part of a reasonable edit restoring fit external links, but even if you were about to successfully argue that in some detail, it would mean only three reverts, so there is still no violation. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 22:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
280849 +++$+++ MatthewFenton +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280848 +++$+++ 280848 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.167376200E09 +++$+++ Partially reverting is still a reversion. <small><font face=\"Tahoma\">'''thanks'''\/ +++$+++ :Partially reverting is still a reversion. <small><font face="Tahoma">'''thanks'''/[[User:MatthewFenton|Fenton, Matthew]] [[User talk:MatthewFenton|Lexic Dark]] [[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|52278 Alpha 771]]</font></small> 23:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
280850 +++$+++ Xaosflux +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280848 +++$+++ 280848 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.167461580E09 +++$+++ Please note, I have just [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=97224153&oldid=97224080 delisted] your account from [[WP:AIV]] (was a [[WP:3RR]] report and not ''obvious vandalism'') you may be getting listed at [[WP:AN\/3RR]] though.  Thanks, \u2014  +++$+++ *Please note, I have just [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=97224153&oldid=97224080 delisted] your account from [[WP:AIV]] (was a [[WP:3RR]] report and not ''obvious vandalism'') you may be getting listed at [[WP:AN/3RR]] though.  Thanks, — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 22:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

18705 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18705 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-21 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.169373480E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Karrmann I uploaded a new batch] today, adn just want to know how I did. (Since I am new to this, I just want soem feedback to make sure I am heading down teh right path)  +++$+++ [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Karrmann I uploaded a new batch] today, adn just want to know how I did. (Since I am new to this, I just want soem feedback to make sure I am heading down teh right path) [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 01:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
18706 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18705 +++$+++ 18705 +++$+++ 2007-01-21 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.169374620E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I too, am impressed by how the Fusion image turned out, especially since It was not like a very careful shot, I just stopped adn snapped it on the way to the exit. I mostly treid to focus on the cars that were either concepts or were not yet on sale (Such as those three 2008 Fords), as they woul dbe more valuable to the project. Plus, thanks for sorting that Volvo image out. I never really knew which model it was, S40 was my best guess. I swear, those Volvos all look exactly the same.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I too, am impressed by how the Fusion image turned out, especially since It was not like a very careful shot, I just stopped adn snapped it on the way to the exit. I mostly treid to focus on the cars that were either concepts or were not yet on sale (Such as those three 2008 Fords), as they woul dbe more valuable to the project. Plus, thanks for sorting that Volvo image out. I never really knew which model it was, S40 was my best guess. I swear, those Volvos all look exactly the same. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 02:17, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

18707 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-25 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.169795220E09 +++$+++ I see what you mean. The colors may be a little bit flashy. I can either use more \"toned-down\" colors such as the one's on my user-page's banner or I could try White. This evening (Pacific Time) I'll do one using a white background w\/ a simple shadow to be a bit more \"classy\" and also increase the background layer, so the image won't appear so closely cropped- I will start w\/ the Lincoln Navigator article. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ I see what you mean. The colors may be a little bit flashy. I can either use more "toned-down" colors such as the one's on my user-page's banner or I could try White. This evening (Pacific Time) I'll do one using a white background w/ a simple shadow to be a bit more "classy" and also increase the background layer, so the image won't appear so closely cropped- I will start w/ the Lincoln Navigator article. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 23:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
18708 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18707 +++$+++ 18707 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.169874660E09 +++$+++ I uploaded a simple White background version on [[Lincoln Navigator]] article. As I have also saved a copy in photoshop format, I can easily make changes to the image. If you have any further suggestions let me know. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I uploaded a simple White background version on [[Lincoln Navigator]] article. As I have also saved a copy in photoshop format, I can easily make changes to the image. If you have any further suggestions let me know. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 21:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

542997 +++$+++ T-dot +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 542997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-12 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.137054660E09 +++$+++ That said - I really do feel your pain. The sudden and unexpected renaming of the 2007 Lincoln Aviator as the 2007 Lincoln \"MKX\" has produced no small amount of chaos and controversy; and then saying it is all about \"letters\" for Lincoln from now on, and then saying MKX is actually pronounced \"Mark X\" (which is alarmingly close to \"Mark Ten\"), and then calling the \"MKS\" (pronounced \"Mark S\") as either a full size Concept Car (which would be E or F class), or a midsize D3-platform based midsize LS replacement (which is itself a mid-plus D\/E class chassis) - it is all very confusing. The best we can do at this point is be patient - wait for the Corporate Executives and Marketing folks get their \"official story\" straight, and let the Full Battle Fury of the Auto Show settle down a bit with the dust; and then post \"just the facts Ma'am\" on Wikipedia.  +++$+++ That said - I really do feel your pain. The sudden and unexpected renaming of the 2007 Lincoln Aviator as the 2007 Lincoln "MKX" has produced no small amount of chaos and controversy; and then saying it is all about "letters" for Lincoln from now on, and then saying MKX is actually pronounced "Mark X" (which is alarmingly close to "Mark Ten"), and then calling the "MKS" (pronounced "Mark S") as either a full size Concept Car (which would be E or F class), or a midsize D3-platform based midsize LS replacement (which is itself a mid-plus D/E class chassis) - it is all very confusing. The best we can do at this point is be patient - wait for the Corporate Executives and Marketing folks get their "official story" straight, and let the Full Battle Fury of the Auto Show settle down a bit with the dust; and then post "just the facts Ma'am" on Wikipedia. [[User:T-dot|T-dot]] 00:31, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
542998 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 542997 +++$+++ 542997 +++$+++ 2006-01-12 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.137056040E09 +++$+++ I agree the information has been confusing. Nevertheless I'm going to go through the official press releases again to find out the current facts about the Lincoln MKS and try to clean up the site once more. Thank you for your quick response.  +++$+++ :I agree the information has been confusing. Nevertheless I'm going to go through the official press releases again to find out the current facts about the Lincoln MKS and try to clean up the site once more. Thank you for your quick response. [[User:Gerdbrendel|Gerdbrendel]] 00:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
542999 +++$+++ T-dot +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 542997 +++$+++ 542998 +++$+++ 2006-01-12 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.137057360E09 +++$+++ Sounds good to me.  I am all in favor of getting good quality official information out there for all to see (it makes good advertising!) - but cannot condone posting rumors and gossip and speculation as encyclopedic \"facts\".  Nor can I abide the release and posting of illegal \"insider information\" that was essentially stolen from the Company.  Ford (and all auto companies) are highly protective of their future product plans, and only release such information when it makes sense to do so.  Thus - I have a big problem with anyone posting the product \"timelines\" that go beyond the current model year (2006), and those publicly announced products (eg:  [[Ford Edge]]) for the next (2007).  Anyway Good Luck, and Thanks for your high quality Contributions to the Cause.  (btw: so this is how you get an indent...)  +++$+++ :: Sounds good to me.  I am all in favor of getting good quality official information out there for all to see (it makes good advertising!) - but cannot condone posting rumors and gossip and speculation as encyclopedic "facts".  Nor can I abide the release and posting of illegal "insider information" that was essentially stolen from the Company.  Ford (and all auto companies) are highly protective of their future product plans, and only release such information when it makes sense to do so.  Thus - I have a big problem with anyone posting the product "timelines" that go beyond the current model year (2006), and those publicly announced products (eg:  [[Ford Edge]]) for the next (2007).  Anyway Good Luck, and Thanks for your high quality Contributions to the Cause.  (btw: so this is how you get an indent...) [[User:T-dot|T-dot]] 01:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

18711 +++$+++ Bull-Doser +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18711 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-01 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.170374520E09 +++$+++ So it's not okay to use skewed-angle images on infoboxes. --  +++$+++ So it's not okay to use skewed-angle images on infoboxes. -- [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]] 16:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
18712 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18711 +++$+++ 18711 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.172473260E09 +++$+++ You should be telling that to yourself, not IFCAR.  +++$+++ :You should be telling that to yourself, not IFCAR. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 23:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

543000 +++$+++ T-dot +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543000 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-12 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.137059640E09 +++$+++ While you are at it - you might want to add the abandoned 2004 Lincoln Mark X Concept (pronounced either \"Mark X\" or \"Mark Ten\" - I forget...) to the Concept Models section at the bottom of the Lincoln Timeline chart - with the MK9 \"Mark 9\" or whatever.  (''Both of these orphans show the importance of keeping Concept and Production cars in the right perspective'').  Here is an official source info starter: [http:\/\/media.ford.com\/newsroom\/feature_display.cfm?release=16655] and some other possible info sources:  [http:\/\/search.yahoo.com\/search?p=Lincoln+%22Mark+X%22&sm=Yahoo%21+Search&fr=FP-tab-web-t&toggle=1&cop=&ei=UTF-8].  You seem to be on a roll - and thought I'd give you another pet project...   +++$+++ While you are at it - you might want to add the abandoned 2004 Lincoln Mark X Concept (pronounced either "Mark X" or "Mark Ten" - I forget...) to the Concept Models section at the bottom of the Lincoln Timeline chart - with the MK9 "Mark 9" or whatever.  (''Both of these orphans show the importance of keeping Concept and Production cars in the right perspective'').  Here is an official source info starter: [http://media.ford.com/newsroom/feature_display.cfm?release=16655] and some other possible info sources:  [http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Lincoln+%22Mark+X%22&sm=Yahoo%21+Search&fr=FP-tab-web-t&toggle=1&cop=&ei=UTF-8].  You seem to be on a roll - and thought I'd give you another pet project...  [[User:T-dot|T-dot]] 01:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
543001 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543000 +++$+++ 543000 +++$+++ 2006-01-12 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.137060000E09 +++$+++ Actually I'm not quite sure that the MK9 and Mark Ten are different vehicles, asides from the Mark X being a convertible and the Mark 9 or MK9 being a hardtop coupe. I'm going to merge the two articles into one called the [[Lincoln MK9]] (Ford Motor says MK stands for Mark anyway). All this name chaos shows the turmoil at the top of Ford Motor's Lincoln Division. Thanks for contributing.  +++$+++ :Actually I'm not quite sure that the MK9 and Mark Ten are different vehicles, asides from the Mark X being a convertible and the Mark 9 or MK9 being a hardtop coupe. I'm going to merge the two articles into one called the [[Lincoln MK9]] (Ford Motor says MK stands for Mark anyway). All this name chaos shows the turmoil at the top of Ford Motor's Lincoln Division. Thanks for contributing. [[User:Gerdbrendel|Gerdbrendel]] 02:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

543002 +++$+++ ApolloBoy +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-19 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.137663780E09 +++$+++ Why did you change the infobox at the [[Dodge Intrepid]] article? My version was just fine, but then you cut it down without giving a reason. What was wrong with my infobox? I thought it explained things well... -- +++$+++ Why did you change the infobox at the [[Dodge Intrepid]] article? My version was just fine, but then you cut it down without giving a reason. What was wrong with my infobox? I thought it explained things well... --[[User:ApolloBoy|ApolloBoy]] 01:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
543003 +++$+++  +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543002 +++$+++ 543002 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Hello. Yes you did explain things well but also a bit to thouroughly -in German we say: \"Zu viel des Guten,\" meaning \"too much of the good.\" I replaced the infobox with a new one that was developed in the Auto Layout Disussion. This new one is used on most luxury car articles, all Full-size car articles and is becoming more and more common among the others. Its meant to be shorter and thus less intimidating to a reader. Another issue was that information that in most vehicles changes with generation such as engine data should be mentioned in the article- just see the discussion. If you really, really don't like the new infobox you can change it back but then the Intrepid will be the only Full-size car without it- anyways I'm not married to the changes I made to the Intrepid page, Dodge seems to be your expertise. Thank you for understanding and my apologized for any inconveneince. Gerdbrendel 01:52, 19 January 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :Hello. Yes you did explain things well but also a bit to thouroughly -in German we say: "Zu viel des Guten," meaning "too much of the good." I replaced the infobox with a new one that was developed in the Auto Layout Disussion. This new one is used on most luxury car articles, all Full-size car articles and is becoming more and more common among the others. Its meant to be shorter and thus less intimidating to a reader. Another issue was that information that in most vehicles changes with generation such as engine data should be mentioned in the article- just see the discussion. If you really, really don't like the new infobox you can change it back but then the Intrepid will be the only Full-size car without it- anyways I'm not married to the changes I made to the Intrepid page, Dodge seems to be your expertise. Thank you for understanding and my apologized for any inconveneince. Gerdbrendel 01:52, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

543004 +++$+++ Sfoskett +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-19 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.137710520E09 +++$+++ FYI, as noted in the discussion page, I have changed the syntax for [[:Template:Infobox Automobile]] in a few areas:  \"engine\" and \"body_style\" are no longer plural; \"shares_with\" has become \"related\"; and \"similar_cars\" is now just \"similar\".  Thanks for your contributions!  -- +++$+++ FYI, as noted in the discussion page, I have changed the syntax for [[:Template:Infobox Automobile]] in a few areas:  "engine" and "body_style" are no longer plural; "shares_with" has become "related"; and "similar_cars" is now just "similar".  Thanks for your contributions!  --[[User:Sfoskett|SFoskett]] 14:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
543005 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543004 +++$+++ 543004 +++$+++ 2006-01-19 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.137726480E09 +++$+++ Alright, makes sense I'll start changing them, which is now knid of a big task considering how many vehicles now feature this table, but that's alright. I am however still unsure about engines being mentioned in the infobox, that might drag them on a bit to long, anyways I also made a comment in th disussion. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Alright, makes sense I'll start changing them, which is now knid of a big task considering how many vehicles now feature this table, but that's alright. I am however still unsure about engines being mentioned in the infobox, that might drag them on a bit to long, anyways I also made a comment in th disussion. Thanks. [[User:Gerdbrendel|Gerdbrendel]] 19:08, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
543006 +++$+++ Sfoskett +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543004 +++$+++ 543005 +++$+++ 2006-01-19 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.137727260E09 +++$+++ I think you'll find that I already fixed all of them!  Cheers!  -- +++$+++ ::I think you'll find that I already fixed all of them!  Cheers!  --[[User:Sfoskett|SFoskett]] 19:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
543007 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543004 +++$+++ 543006 +++$+++ 2006-01-19 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.137727980E09 +++$+++ WOW, thanks.  +++$+++ :::WOW, thanks. [[User:Gerdbrendel|Gerdbrendel]] 19:33, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
543008 +++$+++ Sfoskett +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543004 +++$+++ 543007 +++$+++ 2006-01-22 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.137984780E09 +++$+++ We've been putting general engine and tranny info in the infoboxes - which size and family, but not years and models in general since there's not enough room and we don't want a line wrap in an infobox.  So yes, feel free to say which engines a car was equipped with but not when and with what model and how much horsepower and such.  The same \"engine\" and \"transmission\" lines are in the regular infobox and in the generation one.  -- +++$+++ ::::We've been putting general engine and tranny info in the infoboxes - which size and family, but not years and models in general since there's not enough room and we don't want a line wrap in an infobox.  So yes, feel free to say which engines a car was equipped with but not when and with what model and how much horsepower and such.  The same "engine" and "transmission" lines are in the regular infobox and in the generation one.  --[[User:Sfoskett|SFoskett]] 18:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

18718 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-25 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.172473200E09 +++$+++ BTW, check out the last infobox on BD's userpage.  +++$+++ BTW, check out the last infobox on BD's userpage. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 23:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
18719 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18718 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.172476320E09 +++$+++ BD is one to be ignored when he isn't modifying the encyclopedia.  +++$+++ ::BD is one to be ignored when he isn't modifying the encyclopedia. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 23:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

18720 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.172482620E09 +++$+++ That out of the way, I also want to ask why you reverted my images for [[Oldsmobile Alero]] and [[Chrysler 300]]. And while I understand why you reverted my image addition to [[Chevrolet Corsica]], either one of us needs to get a new image with the wipers down.  +++$+++ That out of the way, I also want to ask why you reverted my images for [[Oldsmobile Alero]] and [[Chrysler 300]]. And while I understand why you reverted my image addition to [[Chevrolet Corsica]], either one of us needs to get a new image with the wipers down. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 01:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
18721 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18720 +++$+++ 18720 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.172484960E09 +++$+++ The clare was not THAT bad, just a small, barely noticable spot by the Chrysler logo. It still was in great perspective. I know a few good-condition Corsicas in my area, but with the Michigan economy the way it is, there are many that are abused. Same goes for the Ford Festiva. The one I got a picture of was horribly beaten up, and most of them are no better. All of the really cheap cars are badly abused because they are mostly owned by very poor families.  +++$+++ :The clare was not THAT bad, just a small, barely noticable spot by the Chrysler logo. It still was in great perspective. I know a few good-condition Corsicas in my area, but with the Michigan economy the way it is, there are many that are abused. Same goes for the Ford Festiva. The one I got a picture of was horribly beaten up, and most of them are no better. All of the really cheap cars are badly abused because they are mostly owned by very poor families. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 02:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

543009 +++$+++ T-dot +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543009 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-20 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.137783720E09 +++$+++ The mid-specialty S197 Mustang, which is a [[Ford D2C platform|D2C]] platform originally inspired (but significantly changed during development) from the Lincoln-Jaguar [[Ford DEW platform|DEW98]] platform used by the [[Lincoln LS]] and [[Jaguar S-type]] and the Ford Europe [[Ford C1 platform|C1]] platform, and is in no conceivable way related to the Mazda [[Ford CD2 platform|CD2]] platform which hosts the Ford Escape, Mercury Mariner, and Mazda Tribute.  The only thing the Mustang has in common with Mazda is it is assembled in the [[joint venture]] Ford-Mazda [[AutoAlliance International|AutoAlliance]] plant in Flat Rock Michigan, which also builds the [[Mazda Mazda6|Mazda 6]] sedan - but on a completely separate and independant production line.  +++$+++ The mid-specialty S197 Mustang, which is a [[Ford D2C platform|D2C]] platform originally inspired (but significantly changed during development) from the Lincoln-Jaguar [[Ford DEW platform|DEW98]] platform used by the [[Lincoln LS]] and [[Jaguar S-type]] and the Ford Europe [[Ford C1 platform|C1]] platform, and is in no conceivable way related to the Mazda [[Ford CD2 platform|CD2]] platform which hosts the Ford Escape, Mercury Mariner, and Mazda Tribute.  The only thing the Mustang has in common with Mazda is it is assembled in the [[joint venture]] Ford-Mazda [[AutoAlliance International|AutoAlliance]] plant in Flat Rock Michigan, which also builds the [[Mazda Mazda6|Mazda 6]] sedan - but on a completely separate and independant production line. [[User:T-dot|T-dot]] 11:02, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
543010 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543009 +++$+++ 543009 +++$+++ 2006-01-20 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.137800820E09 +++$+++ Ok, but then what is the Mustang's platform and who is it shared with? Thanks.  +++$+++ :Ok, but then what is the Mustang's platform and who is it shared with? Thanks. [[User:Gerdbrendel|Gerdbrendel]] 15:47, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
543011 +++$+++ T-dot +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543009 +++$+++ 543010 +++$+++ 2006-01-20 17:24:00 +++$+++ 1.137806640E09 +++$+++ The Mustang is on a unique [[Ford D2C platform|D2C]] platform, there are no other vehicles currently using it.  +++$+++ ::The Mustang is on a unique [[Ford D2C platform|D2C]] platform, there are no other vehicles currently using it. [[User:T-dot|T-dot]] 17:24, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
543012 +++$+++ T-dot +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543009 +++$+++ 543010 +++$+++ 2006-01-20 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.137820440E09 +++$+++ ''Not Quite - the Thunderbird, Lincoln LS, and Mercury Cougar mentioned in the last part of the D2C platform report are highly speculative hypothetical future models - NOT CURRENT platform-mates, therefore should not be listed as \"related\".  The Mustang has NO current \"\"related\" platform-mates.  I did however add the [[Shelby Mustang]] so you would have something listed...''  +++$+++ ::''Not Quite - the Thunderbird, Lincoln LS, and Mercury Cougar mentioned in the last part of the D2C platform report are highly speculative hypothetical future models - NOT CURRENT platform-mates, therefore should not be listed as "related".  The Mustang has NO current ""related" platform-mates.  I did however add the [[Shelby Mustang]] so you would have something listed...'' [[User:T-dot|T-dot]] 21:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

18722 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-04 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.173008640E09 +++$+++ In my defense, I just want to say that a lot of my image insertion\/placement was done by Bull-Doser, adn I only originally placed them where I see fit. Like with the Ecplorere Limited Head image, Pontiac Grand Am, Pontiac Grand Prix head image, Mercury villager head image, etc. YOu can even check who did what in teh edit histories. I inserted most as secondary images.  +++$+++ In my defense, I just want to say that a lot of my image insertion/placement was done by Bull-Doser, adn I only originally placed them where I see fit. Like with the Ecplorere Limited Head image, Pontiac Grand Am, Pontiac Grand Prix head image, Mercury villager head image, etc. YOu can even check who did what in teh edit histories. I inserted most as secondary images. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 03:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
18723 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18722 +++$+++ 18722 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.173009540E09 +++$+++ Still, you are treating me like I blatantly put my images in with no thought, adbn i was saying that lot of the bad image placement was done by Bull-Doser, who has repeatially proven that he doesn't know a good image if it bit him, and also that we seem to have contradicting views on what makes an image \"better\".  +++$+++ :Still, you are treating me like I blatantly put my images in with no thought, adbn i was saying that lot of the bad image placement was done by Bull-Doser, who has repeatially proven that he doesn't know a good image if it bit him, and also that we seem to have contradicting views on what makes an image "better". [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 03:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
18724 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18722 +++$+++ 18723 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.173010620E09 +++$+++ Ignoring clean cars? Could you point out which ones you think are too dirty to fit within the standards?  +++$+++ ::Ignoring clean cars? Could you point out which ones you think are too dirty to fit within the standards? [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 04:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
18725 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18722 +++$+++ 18724 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.173043380E09 +++$+++ No, no. I don't want you to tell me that I need to stop taking pictures of salt covered cars, and SHOW me th eimages you think are of these flithy cars you claim I am photographing.  +++$+++ :::No, no. I don't want you to tell me that I need to stop taking pictures of salt covered cars, and SHOW me th eimages you think are of these flithy cars you claim I am photographing. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 13:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
18726 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18722 +++$+++ 18725 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.173057180E09 +++$+++ They are just overexposed. Ever since last time, I make it a habit to stay from overly dirty cars.  +++$+++ ::::They are just overexposed. Ever since last time, I make it a habit to stay from overly dirty cars. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 17:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
18727 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18722 +++$+++ 18726 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.173059640E09 +++$+++ Could you please tell me which ones you think were overexposed? The only way I can get better is to see what you think is where teh images are not good.  +++$+++ :::::Could you please tell me which ones you think were overexposed? The only way I can get better is to see what you think is where teh images are not good. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 17:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

543013 +++$+++ Prunetucky +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-27 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.141039260E09 +++$+++ being a resident of monterey county, i can assure you that the county seat of monterey county is indeed king city.  salinas may be the largest city, and several county offices are located their, but is not the county seat.-- +++$+++ being a resident of monterey county, i can assure you that the county seat of monterey county is indeed king city.  salinas may be the largest city, and several county offices are located their, but is not the county seat.--[[User:Prunetucky|Prunetucky]] 03:21, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
543014 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543013 +++$+++ 543013 +++$+++ 2006-03-02 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.141293660E09 +++$+++ No, its Salinas- see your talk page. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :No, its Salinas- see your talk page. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 02:01, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

18728 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-05 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.173088500E09 +++$+++ I got two more images up, at [[Chevrolet Caprice]] and [[Geo Metro]]. There were more \"lonely\" cars around, but I accidently took a picture of a car with the owners sitting in it without realizing it (Has that ever happened to you?), adn I was kinda too embarassed to carry on for that session. I felt like a total ass. After A quick apoligizy and a brief explaniation of what I was doing, and the owner understood perfectly, but still, it was real embarassing. Well anyways, you can review them adn see if I was good in inserting them. I don't liek being a burdon. I perfer to work with everyone instead of working agaisnt them.  +++$+++ I got two more images up, at [[Chevrolet Caprice]] and [[Geo Metro]]. There were more "lonely" cars around, but I accidently took a picture of a car with the owners sitting in it without realizing it (Has that ever happened to you?), adn I was kinda too embarassed to carry on for that session. I felt like a total ass. After A quick apoligizy and a brief explaniation of what I was doing, and the owner understood perfectly, but still, it was real embarassing. Well anyways, you can review them adn see if I was good in inserting them. I don't liek being a burdon. I perfer to work with everyone instead of working agaisnt them. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 01:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
18729 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18728 +++$+++ 18728 +++$+++ 2007-03-05 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.173163560E09 +++$+++ I uploaded a new version of the Caprice photo. The first one was taken with the flash off, as I turned if off for taking a unrelated indoor photo, and forgot to put it back. I took the other with the flash on, and it is not as overexposed as the other.  +++$+++ :I uploaded a new version of the Caprice photo. The first one was taken with the flash off, as I turned if off for taking a unrelated indoor photo, and forgot to put it back. I took the other with the flash on, and it is not as overexposed as the other. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 22:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

543017 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-05 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.139153040E09 +++$+++ Hi, was it really neccesary to delete the S-Class picture. The picture was posted there since before I got here and really was the best fit for the article. It is really hard to get all three S-Class in one good picture. Would you mind if put the picture back in? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, was it really neccesary to delete the S-Class picture. The picture was posted there since before I got here and really was the best fit for the article. It is really hard to get all three S-Class in one good picture. Would you mind if put the picture back in? Thanks. [[User:Gerdbrendel|Gerdbrendel]] 07:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
543018 +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543017 +++$+++ 543017 +++$+++ 2006-02-05 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.139205900E09 +++$+++ Yes, it was neccessary to delete them.  The images have no information on their copyright status, and seem likely to be copyright violations. -- +++$+++ :Yes, it was neccessary to delete them.  The images have no information on their copyright status, and seem likely to be copyright violations. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] 22:05, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

18730 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.173515220E09 +++$+++ I added some new images, and you can review, to see if I was right in changing them.  +++$+++ I added some new images, and you can review, to see if I was right in changing them. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 00:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
18731 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.173515700E09 +++$+++ deep breath in* The Camry is shinier, at a better angle, and it better shows the front details of the car. The Saturn SC looks like it was taken from an arial view, and I hate that Impala image. It is cluttered and it is so tightly packed. I just don't like having a tightly packed image as the head image, but that is just me.  +++$+++ :*deep breath in* The Camry is shinier, at a better angle, and it better shows the front details of the car. The Saturn SC looks like it was taken from an arial view, and I hate that Impala image. It is cluttered and it is so tightly packed. I just don't like having a tightly packed image as the head image, but that is just me. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 00:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
18732 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.173516960E09 +++$+++ Got me there. How do you notice all this small stuff?  +++$+++ ::Got me there. How do you notice all this small stuff? [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 00:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

280875 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.183567800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Hu|Hu]] 09:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
280876 +++$+++ Richardshusr +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280875 +++$+++ 280875 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.183638960E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Richardshusr|Richard]] 05:36, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

280877 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280877 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-05 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.183639380E09 +++$+++ I don't have a problem with you removing the speedy delete tag after you googled.  I just think that your approach of \"Assuming the content is true\", and thus not googling (the first time around), is the wrong approach, especially with biographies of living people, per [[:Wikipedia:Citing sources]], which you have avoided addressing.  +++$+++ I don't have a problem with you removing the speedy delete tag after you googled.  I just think that your approach of "Assuming the content is true", and thus not googling (the first time around), is the wrong approach, especially with biographies of living people, per [[:Wikipedia:Citing sources]], which you have avoided addressing. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 05:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
280878 +++$+++ Richardshusr +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280877 +++$+++ 280877 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.183639740E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Richardshusr|Richard]] 05:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

280880 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280880 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-07 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.183796580E09 +++$+++ Hi, saw your edit summary for the Sapir-Whorf page. Can you show me where you saw the info that emdashes are deprecated on WP? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, saw your edit summary for the Sapir-Whorf page. Can you show me where you saw the info that emdashes are deprecated on WP? Thanks. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 01:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
280881 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280880 +++$+++ 280880 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.183802820E09 +++$+++ One clue is that &amp;mdash; does not appear in the list of charcters or strings to Insert that appears below the Editing boxes and buttons, whereas the character \u2014 does appear (in fact it is the second one of a long list).  I'll try to chase down an actual reference.  +++$+++ :One clue is that &amp;mdash; does not appear in the list of charcters or strings to Insert that appears below the Editing boxes and buttons, whereas the character — does appear (in fact it is the second one of a long list).  I'll try to chase down an actual reference. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 03:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
280882 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280880 +++$+++ 280880 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 06:14:00 +++$+++ 1.183814040E09 +++$+++ It turns out that either way is acceptable according to this reference: [[:Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dashes)]].  However I will continue to replace &amp;mdash; with the single character since it will be easier for editors to read source text.  Sorry for the erroneous steer, and thanks for making me check.  +++$+++ :It turns out that either way is acceptable according to this reference: [[:Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dashes)]].  However I will continue to replace &amp;mdash; with the single character since it will be easier for editors to read source text.  Sorry for the erroneous steer, and thanks for making me check. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 06:14, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
280883 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280880 +++$+++ 280882 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.183842660E09 +++$+++ [Commercial plug]: If you know anyone who's interested in endangered languages (or) the Three Kingdoms era in Chinese history (or the relevant pop culture shtuff), please send them to [[WP:ENLANG]] or [[WP:3K]], respectively. Thanks!  +++$+++ :* [Commercial plug]: If you know anyone who's interested in endangered languages (or) the Three Kingdoms era in Chinese history (or the relevant pop culture shtuff), please send them to [[WP:ENLANG]] or [[WP:3K]], respectively. Thanks! [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 14:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

18737 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-27 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.175064480E09 +++$+++ First, I think the angle is a bit better, esspecially with the wheels turned, but that is just my POV. Anyways, I find that your image is a bit overexxposed, as well as that Pacifica has a lot of brake dust on its wheels. It also has the shadow of what looks to be a palm like tree glaring over the hood.  +++$+++ First, I think the angle is a bit better, esspecially with the wheels turned, but that is just my POV. Anyways, I find that your image is a bit overexxposed, as well as that Pacifica has a lot of brake dust on its wheels. It also has the shadow of what looks to be a palm like tree glaring over the hood. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 23:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
18738 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18737 +++$+++ 18737 +++$+++ 2007-03-28 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.175071920E09 +++$+++ No brake dust at all? Look at all the grime around teh hweels. Plus, I can not find any way where your image is superior to mine. If you can, please point it out. Mine is clearer, adn teh car is cleaner.  +++$+++ :No brake dust at all? Look at all the grime around teh hweels. Plus, I can not find any way where your image is superior to mine. If you can, please point it out. Mine is clearer, adn teh car is cleaner. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 01:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

18741 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18741 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.176195540E09 +++$+++ So, thus brings my point of posting this: Are you 100% sure that what we are doing is legal? I don't want any of us getting thrown in jail over this.  +++$+++ So, thus brings my point of posting this: Are you 100% sure that what we are doing is legal? I don't want any of us getting thrown in jail over this. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 01:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
18742 +++$+++ Sable232 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18741 +++$+++ 18741 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.176200880E09 +++$+++ (I'm sure there is some legal precedent about this one way or the other, but this is just laugable anyway.) Invasion of privacy? What an asshole. -- +++$+++ :(I'm sure there is some legal precedent about this one way or the other, but this is just laugable anyway.) Invasion of privacy? What an asshole. --[[User:Sable232|Sable232]] 03:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
18743 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18741 +++$+++ 18742 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 11:46:00 +++$+++ 1.176230760E09 +++$+++ My guess is that if they wanted to, they could make a trespassing charge stick, at least enough to scare you. I've been spoken to by one security guard who didn't have a problem once I explained, but if I meet someone, who does, security or other, I wait until they're gone or go somewhere else.  +++$+++ ::My guess is that if they wanted to, they could make a trespassing charge stick, at least enough to scare you. I've been spoken to by one security guard who didn't have a problem once I explained, but if I meet someone, who does, security or other, I wait until they're gone or go somewhere else. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 11:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
18744 +++$+++ Dureo +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18741 +++$+++ 18743 +++$+++ 2007-06-30 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.183221780E09 +++$+++ Coming from a cop, you are fine, there is no expectation of privacy in a public place. I could see if it was posted with an actual sign stating \"no photography\" or something like that, but seriously what mall would even post that? I don't even think they would press a trespassing issue as they are only open by the grace of people coming to shop there, and there is no reason to alienate customers that are doing nothing more then taking a picture... With that said Mall Ninja's(no offense to legitimate, honest working security guards.) usually try to inflate themselves or find ways to get out there and give off the presence they have more power then they do.  +++$+++ :::Coming from a cop, you are fine, there is no expectation of privacy in a public place. I could see if it was posted with an actual sign stating "no photography" or something like that, but seriously what mall would even post that? I don't even think they would press a trespassing issue as they are only open by the grace of people coming to shop there, and there is no reason to alienate customers that are doing nothing more then taking a picture... With that said Mall Ninja's(no offense to legitimate, honest working security guards.) usually try to inflate themselves or find ways to get out there and give off the presence they have more power then they do. [[User:Dureo|Dureo]] 09:43, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

280887 +++$+++ Roger Davies +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-15 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.184522340E09 +++$+++ You're very quick today. You've beaten me to it on about a dozen new articles so far. :))) -- +++$+++ You're very quick today. You've beaten me to it on about a dozen new articles so far. :))) --[[User:Roger Davies|<font color="maroon">'''R<small>OGER'''</small></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|''TALK'']]</sup> 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
280888 +++$+++ Roger Davies +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280887 +++$+++ 280887 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.184523240E09 +++$+++ I do that too (less competition!). Happy cruft-hunting. -- +++$+++ :I do that too (less competition!). Happy cruft-hunting. --[[User:Roger Davies|<font color="maroon">'''R<small>OGER'''</small></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|''TALK'']]</sup> 11:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

18745 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-14 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.176535260E09 +++$+++ BTW, teh reason I say \"Bull\" is not to insult you, but since I am a member of the Taurus Car Club of America, we call the Tauruses and Sables \"Bulls\" as an affectionate nickname, since they are named after the astrological sign of Taurus, the bull.  +++$+++ BTW, teh reason I say "Bull" is not to insult you, but since I am a member of the Taurus Car Club of America, we call the Tauruses and Sables "Bulls" as an affectionate nickname, since they are named after the astrological sign of Taurus, the bull. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 00:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
18746 +++$+++ Sable232 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18745 +++$+++ 18745 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.176537060E09 +++$+++ Karrmann's right, it's a G1 (an '89-'91, to be precise). The G2 bumpers were a different shape and didn't have the chrome strip. -- +++$+++ :Karrmann's right, it's a G1 (an '89-'91, to be precise). The G2 bumpers were a different shape and didn't have the chrome strip. --[[User:Sable232|Sable232]] 00:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

280891 +++$+++ Ernst_Stavro_Blofeld +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280891 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-15 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.184531640E09 +++$+++ Pretentious and nonsense? I like to liven things up mate -otherwise wikipedia would be dominated by geeks - dull and boring people with no personality.  +++$+++ Pretentious and nonsense? I like to liven things up mate -otherwise wikipedia would be dominated by geeks - dull and boring people with no personality. [[User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld| <font color="darkblue">'''''♦ Sir Blofeld ♦'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Ernst Stavro Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Purple">'''"Expecting you"'''</font></font color> ]][[Special:Contributions/Ernst_Stavro_Blofeld|<font size="-4"><font color="Grey">'''Contribs'''</font></font color>]]</sup> 13:34, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
280892 +++$+++ Somegeek +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280891 +++$+++ 280891 +++$+++ 2007-10-04 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.191552540E09 +++$+++ That slam came out of NOWHERE!   +++$+++ :That slam came out of NOWHERE!  [[User:Somegeek|Somegeek]] 19:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

18750 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18750 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-10 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.181506140E09 +++$+++ Hey man, enjoying the weekend? Well, anyways, I have also taken concern about Spoolintsi and the other accounts, and I too think that they could all be the same guy. I have gotten evidence that links the MikeTSIawd and an IP to his account. I have filed a sockpuppetry case and a checkuse case, and compiled a list of evidence just in case that I need it. Anyways, I just wanted to let you know about this, an dI would like for you to be here to back me up as well as my claims, considering that you were also involved in this edit war. Also, I managed to get the page protected, so we won't have to revert them over and over again. But he and his socks have taken ot trolling the talk page, so we should still watch it. I just wanted to let you know. I [[User:Phaedriel|also have an admin friend]] that may be able to help us with this ordeal once she comes back from a brief wikibreak.  +++$+++ Hey man, enjoying the weekend? Well, anyways, I have also taken concern about Spoolintsi and the other accounts, and I too think that they could all be the same guy. I have gotten evidence that links the MikeTSIawd and an IP to his account. I have filed a sockpuppetry case and a checkuse case, and compiled a list of evidence just in case that I need it. Anyways, I just wanted to let you know about this, an dI would like for you to be here to back me up as well as my claims, considering that you were also involved in this edit war. Also, I managed to get the page protected, so we won't have to revert them over and over again. But he and his socks have taken ot trolling the talk page, so we should still watch it. I just wanted to let you know. I [[User:Phaedriel|also have an admin friend]] that may be able to help us with this ordeal once she comes back from a brief wikibreak. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 13:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
18751 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18750 +++$+++ 18750 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.181524980E09 +++$+++ alright, Checkuser confirmed that they are the same person.  +++$+++ :alright, Checkuser confirmed that they are the same person. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 18:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

280897 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280897 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-17 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.184699940E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  The object is not a company or a corporation.  I did the best I could because there is no Speedy Deletion category for articles that do not adequately assert notability of their subject when the subject is an object.  The thing will probably have to move through the ProD or AfD process.  +++$+++ Thanks.  The object is not a company or a corporation.  I did the best I could because there is no Speedy Deletion category for articles that do not adequately assert notability of their subject when the subject is an object.  The thing will probably have to move through the ProD or AfD process. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 12:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
280898 +++$+++ B. Wolterding +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280897 +++$+++ 280897 +++$+++ 2007-07-17 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.184700180E09 +++$+++ The corresponding notability guideline (to which these tags refer), [[WP:CORP]], deals with companies, organizations, products, and services. That's why products like this one go under \"companies\" for purposes of notability. But sending the article to PROD or AfD is not wrong, in any case. -- +++$+++ * The corresponding notability guideline (to which these tags refer), [[WP:CORP]], deals with companies, organizations, products, and services. That's why products like this one go under "companies" for purposes of notability. But sending the article to PROD or AfD is not wrong, in any case. --[[User:B. Wolterding|B. Wolterding]] 12:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
280899 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280897 +++$+++ 280897 +++$+++ 2007-07-17 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.184700300E09 +++$+++ It's not a product.  I have Proposed it for Deletion.  +++$+++ * It's not a product.  I have Proposed it for Deletion. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 12:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

18757 +++$+++ Daniel J. Leivick +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18757 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-23 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.187854380E09 +++$+++ Let me start by saying I really appriciate your effort to add photos to Wikipedia.  I just wanted to add some constructive criticism.  I've noticed that many of your shots have a skewed horizon line, I'm not sure if it is intentional, but IMHO it looks bad, and creates a strange disconcerting optical effect with all the horizontal text, it also creates a sort of discord with all the images with level horizon lines.  In anycase keep up the good work and try to keep the camera level. -- +++$+++ Let me start by saying I really appriciate your effort to add photos to Wikipedia.  I just wanted to add some constructive criticism.  I've noticed that many of your shots have a skewed horizon line, I'm not sure if it is intentional, but IMHO it looks bad, and creates a strange disconcerting optical effect with all the horizontal text, it also creates a sort of discord with all the images with level horizon lines.  In anycase keep up the good work and try to keep the camera level. --[[User:Daniel J. Leivick|Daniel J. Leivick]] 00:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
18758 +++$+++ Daniel J. Leivick +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18757 +++$+++ 18757 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.187855280E09 +++$+++ Well the car is always going to be angled unless it is a straight profile or head on shot, the brain corrects this by using the horizon line and seeing depth.  When the horizon line is skewed it looks odd and disconcerting.  I know appeals to personal authority are lame, but I used to work in the photo lab at my school and my dad is professional photographer so I do have a pretty good idea not only of what I like, but of what is accepted as good aesthetics in taking pictures.  Just as an example you will never see a skewed horizon line in a car magazine unless they are going for some kind of \"artistic\" impact which I don't think we should be trying to do here. -- +++$+++ :Well the car is always going to be angled unless it is a straight profile or head on shot, the brain corrects this by using the horizon line and seeing depth.  When the horizon line is skewed it looks odd and disconcerting.  I know appeals to personal authority are lame, but I used to work in the photo lab at my school and my dad is professional photographer so I do have a pretty good idea not only of what I like, but of what is accepted as good aesthetics in taking pictures.  Just as an example you will never see a skewed horizon line in a car magazine unless they are going for some kind of "artistic" impact which I don't think we should be trying to do here. --[[User:Daniel J. Leivick|Daniel J. Leivick]] 00:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

543046 +++$+++ Samstayton +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-12 06:08:00 +++$+++ 1.142172480E09 +++$+++ Gerd, this new preson has started vandalising the article with impunity.  He is also playing politics by tacitly supporting you.  I have worked a lot on this article jus as you and do not wish to see this vandalism continue.  Because of the nature of wikipedia, a well-sourced well referenced article can at once be vandalised by persons like Zouf.  I have plenty of energy but no time to keep reverting like he is doing.  This is also because of the R&D work I am doing and the projects I am working on at the moment.  The future of this article looks very bleak and will likely loose its authority because of this persons careless edits and involvement.  If he continues this low quality modification and vandalism, this article will loose its flair, sophistication and factual base.   +++$+++ Gerd, this new preson has started vandalising the article with impunity.  He is also playing politics by tacitly supporting you.  I have worked a lot on this article jus as you and do not wish to see this vandalism continue.  Because of the nature of wikipedia, a well-sourced well referenced article can at once be vandalised by persons like Zouf.  I have plenty of energy but no time to keep reverting like he is doing.  This is also because of the R&D work I am doing and the projects I am working on at the moment.  The future of this article looks very bleak and will likely loose its authority because of this persons careless edits and involvement.  If he continues this low quality modification and vandalism, this article will loose its flair, sophistication and factual base.  [[User:Samstayton|Samstayton]] 06:08, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
543047 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543046 +++$+++ 543046 +++$+++ 2006-03-12 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.142228940E09 +++$+++ I know, I have been busy working on real estate articles here on wiki. I have the article on my watchlist and just like you want to keep it safe from vandalism. I'll revert any future edits that weaken the article. And depending on what's next confront Zouf once again. I think you know that I have a strong interest in this article and am quite willing to defend it. If you have any further suggestions on what to do, please let me know. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I know, I have been busy working on real estate articles here on wiki. I have the article on my watchlist and just like you want to keep it safe from vandalism. I'll revert any future edits that weaken the article. And depending on what's next confront Zouf once again. I think you know that I have a strong interest in this article and am quite willing to defend it. If you have any further suggestions on what to do, please let me know. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 21:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

18759 +++$+++ Roguegeek +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18759 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-30 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.188482700E09 +++$+++ I remember in the past you talking about composure and angle being more important than image quality and am taking those concept into consideration any time I'm replacing images of yours with properly composed images. Please don't take those edits as personal attacks because they are not meant to be that. Also, if there are a number of editors who are agreeing with the replacement of certain images, please try and respect the consensus by not simply reverting edits. I'm hoping I haven't misspoken. Thoughts? ''' +++$+++ I remember in the past you talking about composure and angle being more important than image quality and am taking those concept into consideration any time I'm replacing images of yours with properly composed images. Please don't take those edits as personal attacks because they are not meant to be that. Also, if there are a number of editors who are agreeing with the replacement of certain images, please try and respect the consensus by not simply reverting edits. I'm hoping I haven't misspoken. Thoughts? '''[[User:Roguegeek|Roguegeek]]''' <small>([[User talk:Roguegeek|talk]])</small> 07:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
18760 +++$+++ Roguegeek +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18759 +++$+++ 18759 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.188483180E09 +++$+++ Real quick, I wanted to provide a proper reference. Check out how samples of how vehicle images are properly framed [http:\/\/www.evox.com\/003\/03\/gallery\/index.html here]. FYI, they are the largest automotive photography company in the world, so I would call that a definitive resource, but you could basically pull up any company who specializes in automotive photography to see the same kinds of samples. ''' +++$+++ :Real quick, I wanted to provide a proper reference. Check out how samples of how vehicle images are properly framed [http://www.evox.com/003/03/gallery/index.html here]. FYI, they are the largest automotive photography company in the world, so I would call that a definitive resource, but you could basically pull up any company who specializes in automotive photography to see the same kinds of samples. '''[[User:Roguegeek|Roguegeek]]''' <small>([[User talk:Roguegeek|talk]])</small> 07:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

18761 +++$+++ Bull-Doser +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-27 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.188254880E09 +++$+++ You've photographed over 10 2000-01 Maximas, and that's enough.  You should at least photograph older Maximas as a result. --  +++$+++ You've photographed over 10 2000-01 Maximas, and that's enough.  You should at least photograph older Maximas as a result. -- [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]] 15:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
18762 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18761 +++$+++ 18761 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.188263220E09 +++$+++ And why are you ordering him to stop taking pictures of 01 Maximas? Since you take images yourself, I am sure that you know that you take what you can get, and can not choose what cars are going to be there at that certain day.  +++$+++ :And why are you ordering him to stop taking pictures of 01 Maximas? Since you take images yourself, I am sure that you know that you take what you can get, and can not choose what cars are going to be there at that certain day. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 18:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

280907 +++$+++ JimScott +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280907 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-22 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.185092280E09 +++$+++ Thank you kindly.  +++$+++ Thank you kindly. [[User:JimScott|JimScott]] 01:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
280908 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280907 +++$+++ 280907 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ \"You're very quick today. You've beaten me to it on about a dozen new articles so far. :))) --ROGER TALK 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ *"You're very quick today. You've beaten me to it on about a dozen new articles so far. :))) --ROGER TALK 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

440034 +++$+++ Joe Decker +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 440034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-19 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.295503620E09 +++$+++ Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --> <font color='#66dd44'> +++$+++ Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --> <font color='#66dd44'>[[User:Joe Decker|j<small>&#9883;</small>e decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|<sup><small><i>talk</i></small></sup>]]</font> 22:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
440035 +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ Eloquence +++$+++ 440034 +++$+++ 440034 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.295504760E09 +++$+++ As I already stated years ago, I am the maintainer of that website and the author of the content in question. I give permission for it to be used under Wikipedia's licensing terms.-[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] +++$+++ : As I already stated years ago, I am the maintainer of that website and the author of the content in question. I give permission for it to be used under Wikipedia's licensing terms.-[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]][[User:Eloquence/CP|*]] 22:26, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

539576 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-21 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.240330860E09 +++$+++ Just accept it, guys \u2014 the Bulgarian names of formerly Bulgarian-inhabited villages in Greek Macedonia are very relevant encyclopedic content that we're able to solidly back up with sources. There is no absolutely reason to remove the Bulgarian names from these articles. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ Just accept it, guys — the Bulgarian names of formerly Bulgarian-inhabited villages in Greek Macedonia are very relevant encyclopedic content that we're able to solidly back up with sources. There is no absolutely reason to remove the Bulgarian names from these articles. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 09:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
539577 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539576 +++$+++ 539576 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.240332540E09 +++$+++ \"Names in other languages prominent in the city's history include \u0633\u0644\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0643 in Ottoman Turkish and ''Sel\xe2nik'' in modern Turkish, \u2026\" ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ : "Names in other languages prominent in the city's history include سلانيك in Ottoman Turkish and ''Selânik'' in modern Turkish, …" ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 09:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
539578 +++$+++ PMK1 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539576 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.240343100E09 +++$+++ Go for it then. By the same logic, then every ethnic Macedonian inhabited village in the ROM should also have the \"Bulgarian\" name attached to it. Can you see where you are going now?  +++$+++ :::Go for it then. By the same logic, then every ethnic Macedonian inhabited village in the ROM should also have the "Bulgarian" name attached to it. Can you see where you are going now? [[User:PMK1|PMK1]] ([[User talk:PMK1|talk]]) 12:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
539579 +++$+++ PMK1 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539576 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.240385220E09 +++$+++ You do know that the addition of the usual sources, (V. Kanchov, 1900; Makedonsko i Odrinsko, 1873 etc.) does not justify the addition of the Bulgarian name.  +++$+++ ::::You do know that the addition of the usual sources, (V. Kanchov, 1900; Makedonsko i Odrinsko, 1873 etc.) does not justify the addition of the Bulgarian name. [[User:PMK1|PMK1]] ([[User talk:PMK1|talk]]) 00:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
539580 +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539576 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-22 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.240416120E09 +++$+++ Your POV doesn't concern me, please don't post on my talk page unless you have something surprising and interesting to say. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|\u2192]] +++$+++ ::::: Your POV doesn't concern me, please don't post on my talk page unless you have something surprising and interesting to say. ''[[User:TodorBozhinov|Todor]][[User_talk:TodorBozhinov|→]][[User:TodorBozhinov|Bozhinov]]'' 09:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

18769 +++$+++ Jagvar +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-27 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.193548080E09 +++$+++ Hi IFCAR. I've been reverting vandalism by [[Special:Contributions\/96.232.101.21|96.232.101.21]], and I noticed that one of the fake cars he keeps adding to pages is the [[Toyota Lattice]], which, as I said, is not a real car. When I clicked on the history tab for this \"Toyota Lattice,\" I saw that the page was, interestingly enough, created by [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]]. I know he's a regular contributing member of the Wikiproject, which is why this concerned me. I don't want to point fingers, but do you think he could be involved with this ongoing vandalism?  +++$+++ Hi IFCAR. I've been reverting vandalism by [[Special:Contributions/96.232.101.21|96.232.101.21]], and I noticed that one of the fake cars he keeps adding to pages is the [[Toyota Lattice]], which, as I said, is not a real car. When I clicked on the history tab for this "Toyota Lattice," I saw that the page was, interestingly enough, created by [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]]. I know he's a regular contributing member of the Wikiproject, which is why this concerned me. I don't want to point fingers, but do you think he could be involved with this ongoing vandalism? [[User:Jagvar|Jagvar]] 22:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
18770 +++$+++ Roguegeek +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18769 +++$+++ 18769 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.193548920E09 +++$+++ Sorry to jump in on this conversation, but I've also noticed parallels between the IP and the user in question. Might be a good time to do a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|request for checkuser]] and see if there's any [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppetry]] involved here. ''' +++$+++ :Sorry to jump in on this conversation, but I've also noticed parallels between the IP and the user in question. Might be a good time to do a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|request for checkuser]] and see if there's any [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppetry]] involved here. '''[[User:Roguegeek|Roguegeek]]''' <small>([[User talk:Roguegeek|talk]])</small> 22:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
18771 +++$+++ Karrmann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18769 +++$+++ 18770 +++$+++ 2007-10-28 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.193556480E09 +++$+++ There is an IP and account that keeps adding false info to the [[Pontiac Montana]] talk page, which I would was Canadian. I wonder if this is connected? Just thought I would bring this into the open.  +++$+++ ::There is an IP and account that keeps adding false info to the [[Pontiac Montana]] talk page, which I would was Canadian. I wonder if this is connected? Just thought I would bring this into the open. [[User:Karrmann|Karrmann]] 00:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
18772 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18769 +++$+++ 18771 +++$+++ 2007-10-28 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.193561220E09 +++$+++ I must say that I don't know where I fit into this. Why not bring it up to the user in question, or, because my talk page seems to be a public activity center anyway, the WPA discussion page?  +++$+++ :::I must say that I don't know where I fit into this. Why not bring it up to the user in question, or, because my talk page seems to be a public activity center anyway, the WPA discussion page? [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 01:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

280914 +++$+++ Kiand +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-02 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.191388380E09 +++$+++ He came back? Oh dear oh dear... -- +++$+++ He came back? Oh dear oh dear... --[[User:Kiand|Kiand]] 22:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
280915 +++$+++  +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280914 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-14 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.195044240E09 +++$+++ Yes he's back left this message [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Bobby131313&diff=prev&oldid=171099409] on my talk page. Spreading his hate again here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Lholden&diff=prev&oldid=170707254]. Unbelievable, I've IP and ID banned him from my numismatic forum a half dozen times and he acts like I'm his buddy. Is there some fast track to get this IP ousted too? '''<font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ ::Yes he's back left this message [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bobby131313&diff=prev&oldid=171099409] on my talk page. Spreading his hate again here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lholden&diff=prev&oldid=170707254]. Unbelievable, I've IP and ID banned him from my numismatic forum a half dozen times and he acts like I'm his buddy. Is there some fast track to get this IP ousted too? '''<font color="green">[[User:Bobby131313|Bobby]]</font>''' <sup>I'm [[User talk:Bobby131313|Here]], Are You [[Lost|There]]?</sup> 04:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

571107 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571107 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-05 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.162739220E09 +++$+++ Would you like to Wiki-Adopt me?  Me thinks that your a fine example of a wikipedian, that could teach me the ropes of this wacky and loving association.  If you are interested please see [[WP:ADOPT]] and adopt me.  Thanks future wiki-dad.  Dont forget that once your there you cant just dump me on the street or sell me.  I need food and wiki-love to live otherwise I will die.  '''[[User:culverin|Culv]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ Would you like to Wiki-Adopt me?  Me thinks that your a fine example of a wikipedian, that could teach me the ropes of this wacky and loving association.  If you are interested please see [[WP:ADOPT]] and adopt me.  Thanks future wiki-dad.  Dont forget that once your there you cant just dump me on the street or sell me.  I need food and wiki-love to live otherwise I will die.  '''[[User:culverin|Culv]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|rin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 07:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
571108 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571107 +++$+++ 571107 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.162740780E09 +++$+++ Of course I will adopt you, I'll make the necessary arrangements soon. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Of course I will adopt you, I'll make the necessary arrangements soon. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 07:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
571109 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571107 +++$+++ 571108 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.162742820E09 +++$+++ Also I got these really good improvments that allow to use rollback and much much more............... '''[[User:culverin|Culv]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::Also I got these really good improvments that allow to use rollback and much much more............... '''[[User:culverin|Culv]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|rin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 08:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
571110 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571107 +++$+++ 571109 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.162743000E09 +++$+++ What? Really? What type? How do you get improvements <s>Culverin<\/s> Son? [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::What? Really? What type? How do you get improvements <s>Culverin</s> Son? [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 08:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
571111 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571107 +++$+++ 571110 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.162743540E09 +++$+++ Well basically it allows me to use rollback.  Cite articles for deletion.  Give me a drop down link on hyperlinks.  And allows me to report users in a click.  [[User:Glen S]] kindly gave me these updates.  '''[[User:culverin|Culv]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::::Well basically it allows me to use rollback.  Cite articles for deletion.  Give me a drop down link on hyperlinks.  And allows me to report users in a click.  [[User:Glen S]] kindly gave me these updates.  '''[[User:culverin|Culv]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|rin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 08:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
571112 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571107 +++$+++ 571111 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.162744020E09 +++$+++ So now what?  Will you teach me your trade and groom me in your image?  '''[[User:culverin|Culv]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::::So now what?  Will you teach me your trade and groom me in your image?  '''[[User:culverin|Culv]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|rin]][[Special:Random|?]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|Talk]]''' </sup></small> 08:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
571113 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571107 +++$+++ 571111 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 08:37:00 +++$+++ 1.162744620E09 +++$+++ Those upgrades sound cool, especially roll-back. I might talk to Glen later. But yes, I will help in your learning on Wiki until you become good enough to do it on your own, come to think of it, we've already been working together for a while now. I'll do a check-up on you and give you some links, and advise. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::::Those upgrades sound cool, especially roll-back. I might talk to Glen later. But yes, I will help in your learning on Wiki until you become good enough to do it on your own, come to think of it, we've already been working together for a while now. I'll do a check-up on you and give you some links, and advise. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 08:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

543060 +++$+++  +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543060 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-05 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.144258500E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Image legality questions]]. 10:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
543061 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543060 +++$+++ 543060 +++$+++ 2006-04-06 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.144308960E09 +++$+++ Added licensing. Thanks. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Added licensing. Thanks. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

543063 +++$+++ Admrboltz +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543063 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-06 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.144328820E09 +++$+++ T-Mobile is there as it is a US Cell phone carrier (providing service), not that its based in the US (which I know it isn't) <font color=\"green\">[[User:Admrboltz\/Esperanza|A]]<\/font> +++$+++ T-Mobile is there as it is a US Cell phone carrier (providing service), not that its based in the US (which I know it isn't) <font color="green">[[User:Admrboltz/Esperanza|A]]</font>[[User:Admrboltz|dmrb♉ltz]] <small>([[User talk:Admrboltz|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Admrboltz|C]] | [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~kate/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=Admrboltz&amp;dbname=enwiki k])</small> 06:07, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
543064 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543063 +++$+++ 543063 +++$+++ 2006-04-06 06:38:00 +++$+++ 1.144330680E09 +++$+++ Okay, so you list all cell phone carries which operate in the US. I understand, thanks for clarifing. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Okay, so you list all cell phone carries which operate in the US. I understand, thanks for clarifing. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

280920 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280920 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-30 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.196489820E09 +++$+++ Perhaps, but I'm not sure that running an unmonitored bot, or running an unmonitorable bot (hundreds of edits a minute) is \"good faith\".  +++$+++ Perhaps, but I'm not sure that running an unmonitored bot, or running an unmonitorable bot (hundreds of edits a minute) is "good faith". [[User:Hu|Hu]] 22:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
280921 +++$+++ CBM +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280920 +++$+++ 280920 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.196490000E09 +++$+++ I don't run the bot, but I do run other bots, and I don't see any way to handle the enormous size of the image namespace without making very rapid edits. The purpose of bots, according to the banner, is to do \"repetitive edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually.\" While I would support the theoretical formation of a larger programmer group to run the bot, in the meantime I believe Betacommand is performing a service to the community, as a volunteer. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>( +++$+++ :I don't run the bot, but I do run other bots, and I don't see any way to handle the enormous size of the image namespace without making very rapid edits. The purpose of bots, according to the banner, is to do "repetitive edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually." While I would support the theoretical formation of a larger programmer group to run the bot, in the meantime I believe Betacommand is performing a service to the community, as a volunteer. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 22:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

280922 +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280922 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-30 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.196490420E09 +++$+++ One obvious way to monitor it, is to run a couple of edits first, check them, and then let it loose.  Another way is to require the operator to press \"ok\" on each edit after giving him or her a status screen of the relevant info and some links to click.  The operator can still accomplish many edits per minute this way, and perhaps follow the links for a more thorough check every couple of minutes.  A third way is for the bot to make a list of proposed edits and then operator can do a quality control sample of them every hour or so and then OK a batch.  In the event, having the bot make 750 edits before some alert users complained and got the bot operators attention, is not a good state of affairs.  It could have been much worse if the user had started the bot and then gone to take a shower and shave.  Wikipedia was lucky it didn't happen.  +++$+++ One obvious way to monitor it, is to run a couple of edits first, check them, and then let it loose.  Another way is to require the operator to press "ok" on each edit after giving him or her a status screen of the relevant info and some links to click.  The operator can still accomplish many edits per minute this way, and perhaps follow the links for a more thorough check every couple of minutes.  A third way is for the bot to make a list of proposed edits and then operator can do a quality control sample of them every hour or so and then OK a batch.  In the event, having the bot make 750 edits before some alert users complained and got the bot operators attention, is not a good state of affairs.  It could have been much worse if the user had started the bot and then gone to take a shower and shave.  Wikipedia was lucky it didn't happen. [[User:Hu|Hu]] 22:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
280923 +++$+++ CBM +++$+++ Hu +++$+++ 280922 +++$+++ 280922 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.196490780E09 +++$+++ If the code has been running successfully for some time, and isn't changed, at some point one trusts that errors would likely have been discovered. For example, there are bots that deliver the signpost every week; presumably those bot operators don't need to continue testing their code each time. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>( +++$+++ :If the code has been running successfully for some time, and isn't changed, at some point one trusts that errors would likely have been discovered. For example, there are bots that deliver the signpost every week; presumably those bot operators don't need to continue testing their code each time. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 22:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

543068 +++$+++  +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543068 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-03 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.146685680E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 12:48, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
543069 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543068 +++$+++ 543068 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.146696060E09 +++$+++ No problem, I have added the correct copyright tag. Thank you. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :No problem, I have added the correct copyright tag. Thank you. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 15:41, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

543070 +++$+++ DonIncognito +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543070 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-08 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.147138140E09 +++$+++ Brendel, I was looking at the [[Lexus LS]] and other pages on a higher-resolution monitor (1280x1024) than before, and noticed that, when viewed in a maximized window, the infoboxes turn out to be longer than the sections and turn out not to be synchronized with the corresponding section. Would you prefer to leave the page as is, or rework the infobox syntax? Thanks,  +++$+++ Brendel, I was looking at the [[Lexus LS]] and other pages on a higher-resolution monitor (1280x1024) than before, and noticed that, when viewed in a maximized window, the infoboxes turn out to be longer than the sections and turn out not to be synchronized with the corresponding section. Would you prefer to leave the page as is, or rework the infobox syntax? Thanks, [[User:DonIncognito|DonIncognito]] 18:29, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
543071 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543070 +++$+++ 543070 +++$+++ 2006-05-08 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.147141920E09 +++$+++ I just set the resolution on my monitor to 1280X1024 and see what you mean. I responeded on your talk page. Thanks. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I just set the resolution on my monitor to 1280X1024 and see what you mean. I responeded on your talk page. Thanks. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 19:32, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
543072 +++$+++ DonIncognito +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543070 +++$+++ 543071 +++$+++ 2006-05-10 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.147295280E09 +++$+++ Hello again Brendel, sorry for the delayed response. Anyhow, I'm not very well-versed in Wiki syntax so the only method I know that synchronizes the infoboxes and sections is the one I used in [[Lexus GS]], for example. That does, however, have the unfortunate consequence of the infobox head being above the section line and the infobox effectively \"belonging\" to the previous section. I know that you do not favor this approach but I don't know of any alternatives. If you do, please let me know! For now, I won't be making any changes. Let me know if you have any ideas. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::Hello again Brendel, sorry for the delayed response. Anyhow, I'm not very well-versed in Wiki syntax so the only method I know that synchronizes the infoboxes and sections is the one I used in [[Lexus GS]], for example. That does, however, have the unfortunate consequence of the infobox head being above the section line and the infobox effectively "belonging" to the previous section. I know that you do not favor this approach but I don't know of any alternatives. If you do, please let me know! For now, I won't be making any changes. Let me know if you have any ideas. Thanks, [[User:DonIncognito|DonIncognito]] 14:08, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

585471 +++$+++ AngelOfSadness +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-30 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.209601620E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For reverting vandalism off my userpages ''so'' many times that I've lost count. :)  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For reverting vandalism off my userpages ''so'' many times that I've lost count. :) [[User:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background:#000000 ; color: #30D5C8;"> AngelOfSadness </span>]][[User_talk:AngelOfSadness|<span style="background: #000000; color: #FF69B4;"> talk </span>]] 17:27, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
585472 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585471 +++$+++ 585471 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.209607260E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much, AngelOfSadness! :)  +++$+++ :Thank you so much, AngelOfSadness! :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:01, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

18784 +++$+++ Dwilso +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-13 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.208113620E09 +++$+++ Hey, I have come to seek a reason why my edits were reverted, the land cruiser picture is really ugly and hideous and needs to be replaced immediately. thanks <font face=\"Edwardian Script  ITC\" size=\"4\"> +++$+++ Hey, I have come to seek a reason why my edits were reverted, the land cruiser picture is really ugly and hideous and needs to be replaced immediately. thanks <font face="Edwardian Script  ITC" size="4">[[User talk:Dwilso#talk|<font color="red">Dwilso</font>]]</font> 12:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
18785 +++$+++ Scheinwerfermann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18784 +++$+++ 18784 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.210311780E09 +++$+++ No. This explanation\/excuse doesn't fly. Calling someone a Nazi is '''not''' appropriate, no matter how much you like \"Seinfeld\" The word itself is problematic. But even if you'd used \"poopoohead\" instead, it still wouldn't have been appropriate. Namecalling accomplishes absolutely nothing and is considered a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]]. Stop doing it.\u2014 +++$+++ :No. This explanation/excuse doesn't fly. Calling someone a Nazi is '''not''' appropriate, no matter how much you like "Seinfeld" The word itself is problematic. But even if you'd used "poopoohead" instead, it still wouldn't have been appropriate. Namecalling accomplishes absolutely nothing and is considered a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]]. Stop doing it.—[[User:Scheinwerfermann|Scheinwerfermann]] ([[User talk:Scheinwerfermann|talk]]) 22:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

280929 +++$+++ Messhermit +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-05 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.120550520E09 +++$+++ Hello there! I just realice some of your recent edits to that article. I must said that the Cenepa War was a tactical draw between the two nations involved, since a full scale war was prevented by Presidents Fujimori and Mahuad. It is truth that it was a minor Ecuadorian victory, but I would said that is was much more a Tactical Peruvian victory, since the border was not changed, leaving it in the same way that was supposed to be according to the Rio Protocol. Thanks ! and keep in touch  +++$+++ Hello there! I just realice some of your recent edits to that article. I must said that the Cenepa War was a tactical draw between the two nations involved, since a full scale war was prevented by Presidents Fujimori and Mahuad. It is truth that it was a minor Ecuadorian victory, but I would said that is was much more a Tactical Peruvian victory, since the border was not changed, leaving it in the same way that was supposed to be according to the Rio Protocol. Thanks ! and keep in touch [[User:Messhermit|Messhermit]] 5 July 2005 01:02 (UTC)
280930 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280929 +++$+++ 280929 +++$+++ 2005-07-06 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.120700640E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Albrecht|Albrecht]] July 6, 2005 18:44 (UTC)

18786 +++$+++ Scheinwerfermann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-08 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.210311780E09 +++$+++ Hi, [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]]. I'm trying to move the ball forward on this topic and hold namecalling and invective to a minimum [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Automobiles#Towards_a_coherent_image_policy|here on WPA]]. Since you're a prolific contributor of images and the lack of an explicit policy has created disputes centred in part on the manner in which you assert image placement and preference, if you have a moment and can add your thoughts, the odds of a productive outcome would likely improve. Thanks. \u2014 +++$+++ Hi, [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]]. I'm trying to move the ball forward on this topic and hold namecalling and invective to a minimum [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Automobiles#Towards_a_coherent_image_policy|here on WPA]]. Since you're a prolific contributor of images and the lack of an explicit policy has created disputes centred in part on the manner in which you assert image placement and preference, if you have a moment and can add your thoughts, the odds of a productive outcome would likely improve. Thanks. —[[User:Scheinwerfermann|Scheinwerfermann]] ([[User talk:Scheinwerfermann|talk]]) 22:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
18787 +++$+++ Scheinwerfermann +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18786 +++$+++ 18786 +++$+++ 2008-05-09 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.210372320E09 +++$+++ I understand that a significant part of the perception of your behaviour is down to nothing more than the large number of images you contribute, but even though that's not entirely fair (compare the general perception of Microsoft), it is a reality and you will likely experience a good deal less friction and resistance if you will thoughtfully recognise this perception, acknowledge it, and work to ease it. \u2014 +++$+++ :I understand that a significant part of the perception of your behaviour is down to nothing more than the large number of images you contribute, but even though that's not entirely fair (compare the general perception of Microsoft), it is a reality and you will likely experience a good deal less friction and resistance if you will thoughtfully recognise this perception, acknowledge it, and work to ease it. —[[User:Scheinwerfermann|Scheinwerfermann]] ([[User talk:Scheinwerfermann|talk]]) 15:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

543075 +++$+++ Rentastrawberry +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543075 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-23 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.148451780E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you have heavily edited the article [[El Paseo]]. How are you familiar with Palm Desert? [[User:Rentastrawberry|<font face=\"stop\" color=\"#C41E3A\"><b><i>RENTA<\/b><\/i><\/font>]][[Image:FraiseFruitPhoto.jpg|25px]][[User talk:Rentastrawberry|<small><b><sup><font face=\"goudy old style\" color=\"#C41E3A\"><i>FOR LET?<\/i><\/font><\/sup><\/b><\/small>]]  +++$+++ I noticed that you have heavily edited the article [[El Paseo]]. How are you familiar with Palm Desert? [[User:Rentastrawberry|<font face="stop" color="#C41E3A"><b><i>RENTA</b></i></font>]][[Image:FraiseFruitPhoto.jpg|25px]][[User talk:Rentastrawberry|<small><b><sup><font face="goudy old style" color="#C41E3A"><i>FOR LET?</i></font></sup></b></small>]] [[User:Rentastrawberry/Classic Rock Full List|<b><font face="goudy old style" color="#C41E3A"><i>röck</i></font></b>]] 23:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
543076 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543075 +++$+++ 543075 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.148463540E09 +++$+++ Yes I wrote the El Paseo article. I own a vacation condo in Plam Desert and travel there at least once a year. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Yes I wrote the El Paseo article. I own a vacation condo in Plam Desert and travel there at least once a year. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 02:39, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

280932 +++$+++ Kevin Myers +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-17 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.121640720E09 +++$+++ I'm curious about this too, since you've been changing a lot of these. The \"battlebox\" guidelines (which I did not write) say to use \"killed\", \"wounded\", and \"captured\", which seem to be consistent descriptions or action verbs. \"Dead\" doesn't fit this pattern. Additionally, \"killed in action\" or KIA is perhaps the most familiar way to describe battle fatalities. -- +++$+++ I'm curious about this too, since you've been changing a lot of these. The "battlebox" guidelines (which I did not write) say to use "killed", "wounded", and "captured", which seem to be consistent descriptions or action verbs. "Dead" doesn't fit this pattern. Additionally, "killed in action" or KIA is perhaps the most familiar way to describe battle fatalities. --[[User:Kevin Myers|Kevin Myers]] 15:52, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
280933 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280932 +++$+++ 280932 +++$+++ 2005-07-17 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.121651460E09 +++$+++ Unsure as I am as to what exactly you mean by \"familiar\", I'll point-out that the same battlebox guidelines you cite above recommend ''not'' to use abbreviations like \"KIA\".  +++$+++ :Unsure as I am as to what exactly you mean by "familiar", I'll point-out that the same battlebox guidelines you cite above recommend ''not'' to use abbreviations like "KIA". [[User:Albrecht|Albrecht]] 18:51, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
280934 +++$+++ Kevin Myers +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280932 +++$+++ 280933 +++$+++ 2005-07-17 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.121657640E09 +++$+++ True, but not relevant, since I didn't suggest using the abbreviation. :-) I don't really care which one we use, though \"killed\" is probably standard usage in U.S. military histories, especially in older wars, in order to differentiate between those killed in action and the many more who died from disease.  +++$+++ ::True, but not relevant, since I didn't suggest using the abbreviation. :-) I don't really care which one we use, though "killed" is probably standard usage in U.S. military histories, especially in older wars, in order to differentiate between those killed in action and the many more who died from disease. [[User:Kevin Myers|Kevin Myers]] 20:34, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
280935 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280932 +++$+++ 280934 +++$+++ 2005-07-18 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.121679600E09 +++$+++ I suggest that the terminology for battlebox casualties should be limited to \"dead\", wounded\", and \"captured\" (in any case, I think you'll agree that my \"dead '''or''' wounded\" is clearly preferable to the awkward \"killed '''and''' wounded\" people have begun using recently). The article's main text, of course, can describe the dead as \"killed\" and should note any additional deaths to illness or other non-combat-related causes. Likewise, the article can then draw distinctions between \"prisoners of war\", \"pardoned and released\", \"later executed\", \"stripped of arms and given safe passage to neutral territory\", etc., as the case may be. But troops that, as a result of the battle, are put under enemy control and rendered incapable of fighting for any duration of time should be listed in the battlebox simply as \"captured\". I just don't see the need to burden ourselves with the unnecessary complications some people have introduced.  +++$+++ :::I suggest that the terminology for battlebox casualties should be limited to "dead", wounded", and "captured" (in any case, I think you'll agree that my "dead '''or''' wounded" is clearly preferable to the awkward "killed '''and''' wounded" people have begun using recently). The article's main text, of course, can describe the dead as "killed" and should note any additional deaths to illness or other non-combat-related causes. Likewise, the article can then draw distinctions between "prisoners of war", "pardoned and released", "later executed", "stripped of arms and given safe passage to neutral territory", etc., as the case may be. But troops that, as a result of the battle, are put under enemy control and rendered incapable of fighting for any duration of time should be listed in the battlebox simply as "captured". I just don't see the need to burden ourselves with the unnecessary complications some people have introduced. [[User:Albrecht|Albrecht]] 02:40, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
280936 +++$+++ Kevin Myers +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280932 +++$+++ 280935 +++$+++ 2005-07-18 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.121717400E09 +++$+++ I agree that nothing more is needed in the battlebox other than \"captured\" and \"wounded\" for those categories. \"Killed\" seems to me to be consistent in form with \"captured\" and \"wounded\"; \"dead\", to me, sticks out as inconsistent usage alongside the other words. I don't think you've made a strong case for \"dead\" over \"killed\", but I'll go along with whatever shows up in the battlebox instructions.-- +++$+++ ::::I agree that nothing more is needed in the battlebox other than "captured" and "wounded" for those categories. "Killed" seems to me to be consistent in form with "captured" and "wounded"; "dead", to me, sticks out as inconsistent usage alongside the other words. I don't think you've made a strong case for "dead" over "killed", but I'll go along with whatever shows up in the battlebox instructions.--[[User:Kevin Myers|Kevin Myers]] 13:10, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
280937 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280932 +++$+++ 280936 +++$+++ 2005-07-18 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.121743380E09 +++$+++ I think it stretches credibility to demand any massively compelling argument of me when both words are so widely used. I've maintained that \"dead\" is the more common and scholarly (encyclopaedic) nomenclature for declaring casualties - but not by a huge margin. Grammatically, these words form neither a sentence nor even a list, so I'm not exactly sure where your inconsistency appears. We're not conducting an exercise in phonetic parallelism; we're highlighting casualties, and we should do so in an economic and encyclopaedic fashion. I would attach more gravity to your concern if not for the demonstrable fact that military historians don't seem terribly bothered by these \"inconsistencies\".  +++$+++ :::::I think it stretches credibility to demand any massively compelling argument of me when both words are so widely used. I've maintained that "dead" is the more common and scholarly (encyclopaedic) nomenclature for declaring casualties - but not by a huge margin. Grammatically, these words form neither a sentence nor even a list, so I'm not exactly sure where your inconsistency appears. We're not conducting an exercise in phonetic parallelism; we're highlighting casualties, and we should do so in an economic and encyclopaedic fashion. I would attach more gravity to your concern if not for the demonstrable fact that military historians don't seem terribly bothered by these "inconsistencies". [[User:Albrecht|Albrecht]] 20:23, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

543077 +++$+++ T-dot +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-30 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.149007620E09 +++$+++ Someone was complaining that the Volvo Cars Timeline is messed up [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Automobiles&curid=489998&diff=55824294&oldid=55688100] - please have a look and see if you can \"fix\" it. -- +++$+++ Someone was complaining that the Volvo Cars Timeline is messed up [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Automobiles&curid=489998&diff=55824294&oldid=55688100] - please have a look and see if you can "fix" it. --[[User:T-dot|T-dot]] 09:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
543078 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543077 +++$+++ 543077 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 14:16:00 +++$+++ 1.149023760E09 +++$+++ Alright, I fixed the model spans, otherwise the template looks fine now. Thanks. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Alright, I fixed the model spans, otherwise the template looks fine now. Thanks. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 14:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

543079 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543079 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-29 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.151641560E09 +++$+++ One other issue that occured to me while going briefly through those articles is that so many of them are rather POV and seem to try to argue a case rather than provide any information anybody would be looking for. Perhaps this might not seem so from an American viewpoint, but, well, that's what POV is. In such delicate issues, superb referencing is a most, IMHO (which is why I try to stick with some light fare like cars or Eurovision :D ).  +++$+++ One other issue that occured to me while going briefly through those articles is that so many of them are rather POV and seem to try to argue a case rather than provide any information anybody would be looking for. Perhaps this might not seem so from an American viewpoint, but, well, that's what POV is. In such delicate issues, superb referencing is a most, IMHO (which is why I try to stick with some light fare like cars or Eurovision :D ). [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 21:26, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
543080 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543079 +++$+++ 543079 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.151724420E09 +++$+++ Now I've seen the Upper middle class article has been tagged with GA. I might have missed it, but has it really been through the whole nomination procedure and has somebody NOT involved in the editing of this article reviewed it and given it a go?  +++$+++ :Now I've seen the Upper middle class article has been tagged with GA. I might have missed it, but has it really been through the whole nomination procedure and has somebody NOT involved in the editing of this article reviewed it and given it a go? [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 20:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
543081 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543079 +++$+++ 543080 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.151725320E09 +++$+++ The UMC article was a collaborate effort and if anybody minds, they can take the GA off. Thanks for the future recommendations. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ ::The UMC article was a collaborate effort and if anybody minds, they can take the GA off. Thanks for the future recommendations. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 20:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
543082 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543079 +++$+++ 543081 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.151725920E09 +++$+++ I take it it was NOT through the procedure then :D I DO mind if it the GA tag is being placed on articles that have not been reviewed according to the procedure, i.e. put in the GAnominee list and then reviewed by somebody who has not contributed to the article. That's just how GA works, otherwise we just depreciate the GA tag.  +++$+++ :::I take it it was NOT through the procedure then :D I DO mind if it the GA tag is being placed on articles that have not been reviewed according to the procedure, i.e. put in the GAnominee list and then reviewed by somebody who has not contributed to the article. That's just how GA works, otherwise we just depreciate the GA tag. [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 20:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
543083 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543079 +++$+++ 543082 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.151728140E09 +++$+++ So, you don't think the article is GA material? All other articles I have tagged as GA are still GA status. I mean if you don't think its GA material and deprciates the GA status, I understand and I won't be offended. I usually don't follow the GA procedure beucase, well, it takes to long. But if it so important to you then go ahead and take the GA tag off, I uderstand that your trying to preserve the GA status and as there are other articles I have significantly contributed to in the GA class, I appreciate your efforst to keep up the prestige. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ ::::So, you don't think the article is GA material? All other articles I have tagged as GA are still GA status. I mean if you don't think its GA material and deprciates the GA status, I understand and I won't be offended. I usually don't follow the GA procedure beucase, well, it takes to long. But if it so important to you then go ahead and take the GA tag off, I uderstand that your trying to preserve the GA status and as there are other articles I have significantly contributed to in the GA class, I appreciate your efforst to keep up the prestige. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 21:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
543084 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543079 +++$+++ 543083 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.151729040E09 +++$+++ I never said I don't think so and this is totally unrelated to the issue here. The issue here is that ''Ordnung muss sein'' and the GA procedure is the GA procedure. Why don't we just put \"PhD\" after our names anytime we believe we are clever enough to deserve that? Please remove the GA tags from all the articles where you put them without going through the procedure. It might take long, but, well, that's how it works. GA is a distinction, it's not easily earned. There are also other classification systems on WP, AFAIK, perhaps you can get a review faster or even self-grade the articles under them. Perhaps you could even start your own grading system for sociology-related articles. But GA, even if not as prestigious as FA, is an institution governed by the rules one should obey, IMHO.  +++$+++ :::::I never said I don't think so and this is totally unrelated to the issue here. The issue here is that ''Ordnung muss sein'' and the GA procedure is the GA procedure. Why don't we just put "PhD" after our names anytime we believe we are clever enough to deserve that? Please remove the GA tags from all the articles where you put them without going through the procedure. It might take long, but, well, that's how it works. GA is a distinction, it's not easily earned. There are also other classification systems on WP, AFAIK, perhaps you can get a review faster or even self-grade the articles under them. Perhaps you could even start your own grading system for sociology-related articles. But GA, even if not as prestigious as FA, is an institution governed by the rules one should obey, IMHO. [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 21:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
543085 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543079 +++$+++ 543084 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.151729940E09 +++$+++ Naja, wenn Ordnung sein muss, muss halt eben Ordnung sein - Korintenkakerei ;-) (that's supposed to be funny). Most of the GAs were appropriately added, but after a couple I just found it easier to be the judge myself and think I did a pretty good job, but okay... let's keep the order. '''I agree''', what if everybody just did so... the GA category would lose its prestige. Afterall I would mind if people just put Ph.D. behing their names. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ ::::::Naja, wenn Ordnung sein muss, muss halt eben Ordnung sein - Korintenkakerei ;-) (that's supposed to be funny). Most of the GAs were appropriately added, but after a couple I just found it easier to be the judge myself and think I did a pretty good job, but okay... let's keep the order. '''I agree''', what if everybody just did so... the GA category would lose its prestige. Afterall I would mind if people just put Ph.D. behing their names. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 21:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
543086 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543079 +++$+++ 543081 +++$+++ 2006-06-30 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.151731020E09 +++$+++ Dein Englisch ist eignetlich gar nicht mal so schlecht- besser als das so mancher Muttersprachler ;-). <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :::Dein Englisch ist eignetlich gar nicht mal so schlecht- besser als das so mancher Muttersprachler ;-). <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 22:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

280939 +++$+++ LaLa +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280939 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-24 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.122192180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:LaLa|LaLa]] 01:03, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
280940 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280939 +++$+++ 280939 +++$+++ 2005-07-24 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.122199020E09 +++$+++ I noticed it in the campaign box while reviewing the [[Battle of Chateauguay]]. I had actually been planning on writing about Lacolle Mills myself &ndash; out of pure necessity &ndash; so your initiative came as a pleasant surprise. Great work on the article; you've created a much fuller and more polished account than what I'm accustomed to crafting.  +++$+++ :I noticed it in the campaign box while reviewing the [[Battle of Chateauguay]]. I had actually been planning on writing about Lacolle Mills myself &ndash; out of pure necessity &ndash; so your initiative came as a pleasant surprise. Great work on the article; you've created a much fuller and more polished account than what I'm accustomed to crafting. [[User:Albrecht|Albrecht]] 02:57, July 24, 2005 (UTC)

280941 +++$+++ Dynamax +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280941 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-31 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.122858360E09 +++$+++ Hello there! I just saw your change related to Pizarro's \"line in the sand\" quote in the History of Peru article. I just thought I would mention to you that I'm expanding Francisco Pizarro's article with a lot more details of his expeditions to South America before the fall of the Inca Empire. I'm including links to your articles of the battles of Puna and at Punta Quemada. (I would have probably been done but have been overloaded with work, school, etc.) Anyways, your latest change called my attention since I was the one who put the previous \"line in the sand\" quote in a different context (sort of). So now that I'll update Pizarro's article I thought I might use your new quote if you obtained it from a more authoritative source, so to speak. Maybe you can drop me a message and let me know where you obtained it from :) (I'm only doing this for the collaboration in the improvement of peruvian-related articles)  -- +++$+++ Hello there! I just saw your change related to Pizarro's "line in the sand" quote in the History of Peru article. I just thought I would mention to you that I'm expanding Francisco Pizarro's article with a lot more details of his expeditions to South America before the fall of the Inca Empire. I'm including links to your articles of the battles of Puna and at Punta Quemada. (I would have probably been done but have been overloaded with work, school, etc.) Anyways, your latest change called my attention since I was the one who put the previous "line in the sand" quote in a different context (sort of). So now that I'll update Pizarro's article I thought I might use your new quote if you obtained it from a more authoritative source, so to speak. Maybe you can drop me a message and let me know where you obtained it from :) (I'm only doing this for the collaboration in the improvement of peruvian-related articles)  --[[User:Dynamax|Dynamax]] 18:06, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
280942 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280941 +++$+++ 280941 +++$+++ 2005-08-03 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.123068060E09 +++$+++ I will be delighted to offer help towards the improvement of Peru-related articles &ndash; at least in the military spheres. Unfortunately, commitments to other projects may make this lower priority for a while.  +++$+++ :I will be delighted to offer help towards the improvement of Peru-related articles &ndash; at least in the military spheres. Unfortunately, commitments to other projects may make this lower priority for a while. [[User:Albrecht|Albrecht]] 04:21, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

18799 +++$+++ A2 supersonique +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18799 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-08 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.228782720E09 +++$+++ Your picture (Image:06-07 Subaru Outback Sport.jpg) is not a [[Subaru Outback#Subaru Outback Sport|Subaru Outback Sport]] but a [[Subaru Impreza]]. Please correct your error. Thank you.--<font face=\"Kristen ITC\">[[User talk:A2 supersonique | <span style=\"color: #FF2200; font-weight: bold;\">''A2''<\/span> ]]   +++$+++ Your picture (Image:06-07 Subaru Outback Sport.jpg) is not a [[Subaru Outback#Subaru Outback Sport|Subaru Outback Sport]] but a [[Subaru Impreza]]. Please correct your error. Thank you.--<font face="Kristen ITC">[[User talk:A2 supersonique | <span style="color: #FF2200; font-weight: bold;">''A2''</span> ]]  [[User:A2 supersonique|<span style="color: #FF8000; font-weight: bold;">supersonique</span>]]</font> 16:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
18800 +++$+++ A2 supersonique +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18799 +++$+++ 18799 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.228788660E09 +++$+++ I verify and as well you have reason.--<font face=\"Kristen ITC\">[[User talk:A2 supersonique | <span style=\"color: #FF2200; font-weight: bold;\">''A2''<\/span> ]]   +++$+++ :I verify and as well you have reason.--<font face="Kristen ITC">[[User talk:A2 supersonique | <span style="color: #FF2200; font-weight: bold;">''A2''</span> ]]  [[User:A2 supersonique|<span style="color: #FF8000; font-weight: bold;">supersonique</span>]]</font> 18:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

543088 +++$+++  +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543088 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.155224280E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 08:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
543089 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543088 +++$+++ 543088 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.155266280E09 +++$+++ This isn't a very good image and I only upoloaded it for temporary use until something better poped-up. So you can go ahead and delete it. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :This isn't a very good image and I only upoloaded it for temporary use until something better poped-up. So you can go ahead and delete it. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 20:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

543091 +++$+++ Samstayton +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-11 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.155363540E09 +++$+++ he has not done anything to remove POV from german cars like S-class and BMW.  +++$+++ he has not done anything to remove POV from german cars like S-class and BMW. [[User:Samstayton|Samstayton]] 23:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
543092 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543091 +++$+++ 543091 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.155363720E09 +++$+++ If you have a problem with any of the articles on German cars, why don't you just go and correct it? Wait, why am I answering a vandal on somebody else's talk page? Egal...  +++$+++ :If you have a problem with any of the articles on German cars, why don't you just go and correct it? Wait, why am I answering a vandal on somebody else's talk page? Egal... [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 23:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
543093 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543091 +++$+++ 543092 +++$+++ 2006-08-11 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.155363840E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I was kind of thinking the same thing. (I mean the why doesn't he go to German cars and remove the POV himself, I myself have responded to all sorts of comments on other people's talk pages ;-)) What I can't figure out is why Sam is addressing me in the third person-I guess I'm royalty-oh, well... <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ ::Yeah, I was kind of thinking the same thing. (I mean the why doesn't he go to German cars and remove the POV himself, I myself have responded to all sorts of comments on other people's talk pages ;-)) What I can't figure out is why Sam is addressing me in the third person-I guess I'm royalty-oh, well... <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 23:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
543094 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543091 +++$+++ 543093 +++$+++ 2006-08-12 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.155369840E09 +++$+++ Hi again, could you revert Sam's last revert? I would be running into 3RR, Sam actually already did, but I don't know whether he was aware of that, so I placed a warning message on his talk page. You are still safe, so you can revert it. If he continues to do the revert thing, we are now clear to submit a 3RR complaint, as he is now aware of the rule. Thx,  +++$+++ :::Hi again, could you revert Sam's last revert? I would be running into 3RR, Sam actually already did, but I don't know whether he was aware of that, so I placed a warning message on his talk page. You are still safe, so you can revert it. If he continues to do the revert thing, we are now clear to submit a 3RR complaint, as he is now aware of the rule. Thx, [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 01:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

18804 +++$+++ Rderijcke +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18804 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-01 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.233484860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Rderijcke|Rderijcke]] ([[User talk:Rderijcke|talk]]) 02:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
18805 +++$+++ Rderijcke +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18804 +++$+++ 18804 +++$+++ 2009-02-01 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.233520200E09 +++$+++ As far as I know, the only visual differences between the European version and the US version of LeBaron cars are the [http:\/\/kicken.dendmedia.com\/lbmods\/mirrors_small.jpg mirrors], the [http:\/\/kicken.dendmedia.com\/lbmods\/tail_lights_small.jpg tail lights], the [http:\/\/kicken.dendmedia.com\/lbmods\/side_marker_lights.jpg side marker lights] missing on the European version (being replaced by the small side flash lights in the front side panel) and the digital dash option being not available. As for the background clutter: I understand your motivation for that, but then why not take a good picture of a US version LeBaron in good shape? I've got a [[:Image:Baron 010.jpg|picture with less clutter]] as well but its focus is vague so I don't consider that to be a better illustration on the LeBaron topic.  +++$+++ : As far as I know, the only visual differences between the European version and the US version of LeBaron cars are the [http://kicken.dendmedia.com/lbmods/mirrors_small.jpg mirrors], the [http://kicken.dendmedia.com/lbmods/tail_lights_small.jpg tail lights], the [http://kicken.dendmedia.com/lbmods/side_marker_lights.jpg side marker lights] missing on the European version (being replaced by the small side flash lights in the front side panel) and the digital dash option being not available. As for the background clutter: I understand your motivation for that, but then why not take a good picture of a US version LeBaron in good shape? I've got a [[:Image:Baron 010.jpg|picture with less clutter]] as well but its focus is vague so I don't consider that to be a better illustration on the LeBaron topic. [[User:Rderijcke|Rderijcke]] ([[User talk:Rderijcke|talk]]) 12:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
18806 +++$+++ Rderijcke +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18804 +++$+++ 18805 +++$+++ 2009-02-01 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.233521160E09 +++$+++ Ok, I will crop the image and put it as the new topping image then.  +++$+++ :: Ok, I will crop the image and put it as the new topping image then. [[User:Rderijcke|Rderijcke]] ([[User talk:Rderijcke|talk]]) 12:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

265278 +++$+++ RasputinAXP +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-25 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.148597220E09 +++$+++ Never mind, [[User talk:Maester mensch|Mensch]] told me it was him :) Sorry!  +++$+++ Never mind, [[User talk:Maester mensch|Mensch]] told me it was him :) Sorry! [[User talk:RasputinAXP|<font color="#FFFFFF" style="background: maroon;">&nbsp;RasputinAXP&nbsp;</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/RasputinAXP|<small>c</small>]] 15:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
265279 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265278 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.148601000E09 +++$+++ About which articles are you talking? Maybe I'll be able to find them somewhere. I redirected the page you contributed a lot to, about [[Frank Pais]] to a renamed page ([[Frank Pa\xeds]], with an accent on the \"i\"), but you should be able to find that one. There are some other places, other than the helpdesk, where you can ask for help or procudures you can start, I'll see if I can dig up the URLS. <strong> +++$+++ ::About which articles are you talking? Maybe I'll be able to find them somewhere. I redirected the page you contributed a lot to, about [[Frank Pais]] to a renamed page ([[Frank País]], with an accent on the "i"), but you should be able to find that one. There are some other places, other than the helpdesk, where you can ask for help or procudures you can start, I'll see if I can dig up the URLS. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 16:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

543095 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543095 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-10 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.155263340E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ Regards, [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 19:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
543096 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543095 +++$+++ 543095 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.155265860E09 +++$+++ Yeah, now I see the lexical problem... I used the name Task Forces aping the other WikiProject, but actually those are \"Interest Groups\" and tasks are something quite different - ALL TFs should have adding info on design\/marketing and removing POV as their tasks. I think we need to work general guidelines for auto articles (perhaps bei Gelegenheit of developing the Assessment Scheme) that would include all that info. Would you be willing to try to start compiling them?  +++$+++ :Yeah, now I see the lexical problem... I used the name Task Forces aping the other WikiProject, but actually those are "Interest Groups" and tasks are something quite different - ALL TFs should have adding info on design/marketing and removing POV as their tasks. I think we need to work general guidelines for auto articles (perhaps bei Gelegenheit of developing the Assessment Scheme) that would include all that info. Would you be willing to try to start compiling them? [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 20:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
543097 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543095 +++$+++ 543096 +++$+++ 2006-08-10 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.155266220E09 +++$+++ Oh, well du'h. Yes, those should be taks of any TF-sorry about that, I get it now. I think working \"bei Gelegenheit\" is perhaps the best way-let's see how thinks come along. Start compelling-well I'm still trying to compell people to review some of my articles and put their disucssions in the right place on the US project- a lot of things at one time-so I'll see what I can do. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ ::Oh, well du'h. Yes, those should be taks of any TF-sorry about that, I get it now. I think working "bei Gelegenheit" is perhaps the best way-let's see how thinks come along. Start compelling-well I'm still trying to compell people to review some of my articles and put their disucssions in the right place on the US project- a lot of things at one time-so I'll see what I can do. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 20:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

280952 +++$+++ Morven +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-27 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.133089920E09 +++$+++ Although it's very tempting to conclude the T90 camera was named 'the tank' after the T90 MBT, the latter's 1993 introduction makes it seem a little less likely, which is why I left it out in the first place.  Perhaps the nickname developed later on, or perhaps the T90 designation was known for a while before the tank actually appeared? \u2014 +++$+++ Although it's very tempting to conclude the T90 camera was named 'the tank' after the T90 MBT, the latter's 1993 introduction makes it seem a little less likely, which is why I left it out in the first place.  Perhaps the nickname developed later on, or perhaps the T90 designation was known for a while before the tank actually appeared? —[[User:Morven|Matthew Brown]] ([[User talk:Morven|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Morven|C]]) 03:12, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
280953 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280952 +++$+++ 280952 +++$+++ 2005-11-27 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.133092380E09 +++$+++ I assumed the nickname was acquired later on, after the tank had been introduced &ndash; surely it takes a while for a camera to earn a reputation for \"ruggedness.\" Just guesswork on my part, of course, but the match seemed too perfect to be a coincidence.  +++$+++ :I assumed the nickname was acquired later on, after the tank had been introduced &ndash; surely it takes a while for a camera to earn a reputation for "ruggedness." Just guesswork on my part, of course, but the match seemed too perfect to be a coincidence. [[User:Albrecht|Albrecht]] 03:53, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
280954 +++$+++ Morven +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280952 +++$+++ 280953 +++$+++ 2005-11-27 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.133095440E09 +++$+++ I'm going to ask my sources and see if they know the derivation. I'd like to document it, if it's the case. \u2014 +++$+++ ::I'm going to ask my sources and see if they know the derivation. I'd like to document it, if it's the case. —[[User:Morven|Matthew Brown]] ([[User talk:Morven|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Morven|C]]) 04:44, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

543098 +++$+++ T-dot +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-11 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.155364380E09 +++$+++ Yo G.  I noticed you have a User template for Lincoln Town Car.  I'm guessing you probably made it yourself.  Well, I happen to be a very enthusiatic Lincoln LS V8 owner, loaded and in \"Vivid Red\" (sometimes I get to drive a loaner Town Car while my LS is getting serviced).  Anyway just wondering if maybe you thought about making similar User templates for the rest of us Lincoln owners, or perhaps you already did?  We gotta take a stand for our red-blooded American Luxury cars.  Yes I know you are German, but we can overlook that ... -- +++$+++ Yo G.  I noticed you have a User template for Lincoln Town Car.  I'm guessing you probably made it yourself.  Well, I happen to be a very enthusiatic Lincoln LS V8 owner, loaded and in "Vivid Red" (sometimes I get to drive a loaner Town Car while my LS is getting serviced).  Anyway just wondering if maybe you thought about making similar User templates for the rest of us Lincoln owners, or perhaps you already did?  We gotta take a stand for our red-blooded American Luxury cars.  Yes I know you are German, but we can overlook that ... --[[User:T-dot|T-dot]] 23:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
543099 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543098 +++$+++ 543098 +++$+++ 2006-08-12 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.155366780E09 +++$+++ Okay, I can make such a template-how about you send me a picture of your LS. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Okay, I can make such a template-how about you send me a picture of your LS. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
543100 +++$+++ T-dot +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543098 +++$+++ 543099 +++$+++ 2006-08-12 13:22:00 +++$+++ 1.155414120E09 +++$+++ Why thank you - I'll polish it up and get to work on that.  I will have to make it a really good one though, after all the grief I have been giving to other users, who went around systematically replacing the well composed \"fair use\" professional photographs provided by automakers, with really crappy, sub-amateurish, poorly lit, badly composed, fuzzy, and horribly exposed pics of some car they saw in a supermarket parking lot with distracting backgrounds, and shadows (or even reflections) of themselves and other nearby objects falling on the car.  I'll let you know when I have something, and if it is high enough quality, you can decide if it is worthy of further use on the Wikipedia.  I kind of wish we could adopt a policy where other amateur photographers would post a number of their automobile photographs in a sandbox area, and allow the rest of us to critique them and decide which ones are worthy of posting in articles.  Some folks just \"bull doze\" their photos in, without discussion, and they are just horrible examples from any sort of critical photographic quality perspective - but they serve as terrific examples of how to make a really bad photographs, from Photography 101 class.  There I go, rambling again.  -- +++$+++ ::Why thank you - I'll polish it up and get to work on that.  I will have to make it a really good one though, after all the grief I have been giving to other users, who went around systematically replacing the well composed "fair use" professional photographs provided by automakers, with really crappy, sub-amateurish, poorly lit, badly composed, fuzzy, and horribly exposed pics of some car they saw in a supermarket parking lot with distracting backgrounds, and shadows (or even reflections) of themselves and other nearby objects falling on the car.  I'll let you know when I have something, and if it is high enough quality, you can decide if it is worthy of further use on the Wikipedia.  I kind of wish we could adopt a policy where other amateur photographers would post a number of their automobile photographs in a sandbox area, and allow the rest of us to critique them and decide which ones are worthy of posting in articles.  Some folks just "bull doze" their photos in, without discussion, and they are just horrible examples from any sort of critical photographic quality perspective - but they serve as terrific examples of how to make a really bad photographs, from Photography 101 class.  There I go, rambling again.  --[[User:T-dot|T-dot]] 13:22, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
543101 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543098 +++$+++ 543100 +++$+++ 2006-08-12 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.155426120E09 +++$+++ True a sandbox would be a good idea. But consider we still don't really have a \"good\" photo af an LS-the best one is again in a parking lot and the other is from the side. I think what a lot of users forget is that the background is just about as important as the car. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :::True a sandbox would be a good idea. But consider we still don't really have a "good" photo af an LS-the best one is again in a parking lot and the other is from the side. I think what a lot of users forget is that the background is just about as important as the car. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 16:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

18811 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-30 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.251630300E09 +++$+++ IFCAR, I have looked at all the images of the Paseo on the Commons, and if feel the blue one best meets WP:CARPIX guidelines. Obviously, we disagree here on which criteria are most important, but as I said before, please look beyond a thumbnail sizing. Regards, <small> +++$+++ IFCAR, I have looked at all the images of the Paseo on the Commons, and if feel the blue one best meets WP:CARPIX guidelines. Obviously, we disagree here on which criteria are most important, but as I said before, please look beyond a thumbnail sizing. Regards, <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 04:05, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
18812 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18811 +++$+++ 18811 +++$+++ 2009-08-30 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.251654600E09 +++$+++ [[User:Typ932]] added [[:File:Toyota Paseo front 20080215.jpg|this image]], which I think looks the best from a thumbnail perspective, and \"alright\" (not great) at full resolution. <small> +++$+++ :[[User:Typ932]] added [[:File:Toyota Paseo front 20080215.jpg|this image]], which I think looks the best from a thumbnail perspective, and "alright" (not great) at full resolution. <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 10:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

18813 +++$+++ Audi152 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18813 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-14 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.258258140E09 +++$+++ It has been asked before, Buick does not mind either way  +++$+++ It has been asked before, Buick does not mind either way [[User:Audi152|Audi152]] ([[User talk:Audi152|talk]]) 20:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
18814 +++$+++ Audi152 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18813 +++$+++ 18813 +++$+++ 2009-11-15 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.258324920E09 +++$+++ I will try to find it again  +++$+++ :I will try to find it again [[User:Audi152|Audi152]] ([[User talk:Audi152|talk]]) 14:42, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
18815 +++$+++ Audi152 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-18 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.258536720E09 +++$+++ Well Speaking that almost all the auto news companies have posted the pictures on their articles and GM has not said anything, I'm sure it was release to the public domain +++$+++ :::Well Speaking that almost all the auto news companies have posted the pictures on their articles and GM has not said anything, I'm sure it was release to the public domain[[User:Audi152|Audi152]] ([[User talk:Audi152|talk]]) 01:32, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

543102 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-16 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.155714720E09 +++$+++ Gerd, Sam's on the rampage again - I will revert him until I can, but I am afraid sb will have to take over at one point. I hope you will be able to. In case of his persistence, do report him to 3RR - perhaps that will teach him something. Regards,  +++$+++ Gerd, Sam's on the rampage again - I will revert him until I can, but I am afraid sb will have to take over at one point. I hope you will be able to. In case of his persistence, do report him to 3RR - perhaps that will teach him something. Regards, [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 00:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
543103 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543102 +++$+++ 543102 +++$+++ 2006-08-16 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.155714780E09 +++$+++ Oy, and that on my vacation ;-)-okay I'm here now and I'll check back later-on the fourth I'll file the report. Cheers. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Oy, and that on my vacation ;-)-okay I'm here now and I'll check back later-on the fourth I'll file the report. Cheers. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
543104 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543102 +++$+++ 543103 +++$+++ 2006-08-16 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.155715020E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the bother, I've seen you can't keep away from the net anyway, so I thought I'll just let you know so that you could have some guilty fun midway between the swimming pool and the restaurant :D Frohe Ferien again :D  +++$+++ ::Sorry for the bother, I've seen you can't keep away from the net anyway, so I thought I'll just let you know so that you could have some guilty fun midway between the swimming pool and the restaurant :D Frohe Ferien again :D [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 00:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
543105 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543102 +++$+++ 543104 +++$+++ 2006-08-16 01:00:00 +++$+++ 1.155715200E09 +++$+++ So true! <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :::So true! <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 01:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
543106 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543102 +++$+++ 543105 +++$+++ 2006-08-16 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.155716220E09 +++$+++ Wow! Went faster than I thought it would be, thanks! I have no idea what Sam was thinking, he was clearly aware what he is in for... Anyway, have a great vacation while I am going to have some good sleep :D Auf Wiederlesen  +++$+++ ::::Wow! Went faster than I thought it would be, thanks! I have no idea what Sam was thinking, he was clearly aware what he is in for... Anyway, have a great vacation while I am going to have some good sleep :D Auf Wiederlesen [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 01:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
543107 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543102 +++$+++ 543102 +++$+++ 2006-08-16 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.155716340E09 +++$+++ Gute Nacht-Ich schaue ja eh immer einmal am Tag nach was hier alles ab geht ;-) <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Gute Nacht-Ich schaue ja eh immer einmal am Tag nach was hier alles ab geht ;-) <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 01:19, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

280960 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-28 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.135761540E09 +++$+++ Done!  Somewhat strange that he created a copy, I suppose; but at least straight copies are easily deleteable.  &mdash; +++$+++ Done!  Somewhat strange that he created a copy, I suppose; but at least straight copies are easily deleteable.  &mdash;[[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 01:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
280961 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280960 +++$+++ 280960 +++$+++ 2005-12-28 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.135769400E09 +++$+++ Italy a part of the British Empire?! Both of those need to be taken out and shot.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Italy a part of the British Empire?! Both of those need to be taken out and shot.  &mdash;[[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 03:30, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
280962 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280960 +++$+++ 280961 +++$+++ 2005-12-29 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.135926900E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I've been buried under various administrative and disciplinary nonsense for the past few days.  I've listed it [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion\/2005 December 29|here]]; unfortunately, it has to go via the bureaucratic route. &mdash; +++$+++ ::Sorry, I've been buried under various administrative and disciplinary nonsense for the past few days.  I've listed it [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2005 December 29|here]]; unfortunately, it has to go via the bureaucratic route. &mdash;[[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 23:15, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
280963 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280960 +++$+++ 280962 +++$+++ 2006-01-05 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.136515620E09 +++$+++ No idea what's going on with it.  Since it's still tagged, it's likely that it was simply overlooked, rather than actually kept.  I can't really close the discussion, since I nominated it; so I would suggest picking a random admin from the [[WP:LA|list]] and asking them to take a look.  My apologies that I can't do more to help here. &mdash;[[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::No idea what's going on with it.  Since it's still tagged, it's likely that it was simply overlooked, rather than actually kept.  I can't really close the discussion, since I nominated it; so I would suggest picking a random admin from the [[WP:LA|list]] and asking them to take a look.  My apologies that I can't do more to help here. &mdash;[[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin|hin]] 18:47, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

527424 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527424 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-28 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.164714060E09 +++$+++ Hi, Demon.  I've just filed an RfC at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation\/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television)]], and {{user|Elonka}} (one of the disputants in the matter) edited the \"Issues to be mediated\" section, instead of adding it at \"Additional issues to be mediated\".  What's the correct course of action now?  I don't want to jeopardize the case's chances of being accepted.  I asked Essjay, but I notice that he says that he's busy, so I thought I'd ask you as well.  Thanks. \u2014 +++$+++ Hi, Demon.  I've just filed an RfC at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television)]], and {{user|Elonka}} (one of the disputants in the matter) edited the "Issues to be mediated" section, instead of adding it at "Additional issues to be mediated".  What's the correct course of action now?  I don't want to jeopardize the case's chances of being accepted.  I asked Essjay, but I notice that he says that he's busy, so I thought I'd ask you as well.  Thanks. —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 03:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
527425 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527424 +++$+++ 527424 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164771240E09 +++$+++ The situation has worsened \u2014 there's now an edit war on the RfM page itself.  Some guidance from a MedCom member would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks. \u2014 +++$+++ :The situation has worsened — there's now an edit war on the RfM page itself.  Some guidance from a MedCom member would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks. —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 19:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
527426 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527424 +++$+++ 527425 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.164772740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your response, Demon.  Right now I'm trying to get the participants to talk out a neutral wording on the RfM's talk page.  Have we completely shot our chances of getting mediation accepted?  There are so many participants, I'm worried that we'll never be able to get a wording that's acceptable to everybody, even though I ''do'' think that everybody wants a resolution to the situation, and is prepared to submit to mediation.  What should we do about the RfM page itself? \u2014 +++$+++ ::Thanks for your response, Demon.  Right now I'm trying to get the participants to talk out a neutral wording on the RfM's talk page.  Have we completely shot our chances of getting mediation accepted?  There are so many participants, I'm worried that we'll never be able to get a wording that's acceptable to everybody, even though I ''do'' think that everybody wants a resolution to the situation, and is prepared to submit to mediation.  What should we do about the RfM page itself? —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 19:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
527427 +++$+++ Josiah Rowe +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527424 +++$+++ 527426 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.164773100E09 +++$+++ Thank you. \u2014 +++$+++ :::Thank you. —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 20:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
527428 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527424 +++$+++ 527427 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.164773400E09 +++$+++ Josiah and I are admins.  We can lock it for you.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::::Josiah and I are admins.  We can lock it for you.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 20:10, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
527429 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527424 +++$+++ 527428 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.164773520E09 +++$+++ That's fine.  Although it's currently in the state I ''don't'' want it so it's difficult to claim bias!  :)  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::That's fine.  Although it's currently in the state I ''don't'' want it so it's difficult to claim bias!  :)  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 20:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

18819 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-31 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.264940520E09 +++$+++ Hi IFCAR, I have a question about your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Chevrolet_Cruze&action=historysubmit&diff=341004214&oldid=339708496 recent edit] to the [[Chevrolet Cruze]] article. In spite of our policy stating that images do not have to be any particular version of a car (i.e. a Holden or a Chevrolet), do you think that the Chevrolet version might be better suited to the main infobox image? I only say this as the Holden version (like the Daewoo) looks quite different due the absence of the two-bar Chevrolet grille. Also, I believe the Chevrolet version would be more useful to readers as it is the most common variant. <small> +++$+++ Hi IFCAR, I have a question about your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chevrolet_Cruze&action=historysubmit&diff=341004214&oldid=339708496 recent edit] to the [[Chevrolet Cruze]] article. In spite of our policy stating that images do not have to be any particular version of a car (i.e. a Holden or a Chevrolet), do you think that the Chevrolet version might be better suited to the main infobox image? I only say this as the Holden version (like the Daewoo) looks quite different due the absence of the two-bar Chevrolet grille. Also, I believe the Chevrolet version would be more useful to readers as it is the most common variant. <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 04:22, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
18820 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18819 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-31 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.264975020E09 +++$+++ With regards to a second article, the Holden version will probably get split away from the main Chevrolet article once production in Australia begins in 12 months time. Holden are designing the Cruze hatchback and our version is likely to be restyled as well, making it unique enough to separate. <small> +++$+++ ::With regards to a second article, the Holden version will probably get split away from the main Chevrolet article once production in Australia begins in 12 months time. Holden are designing the Cruze hatchback and our version is likely to be restyled as well, making it unique enough to separate. <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 13:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

543108 +++$+++ Nobleeagle +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543108 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-23 08:02:00 +++$+++ 1.156345320E09 +++$+++ It's getting monotonous. Considering it's the same person again and again. In one archive of [[Talk:Major power]] and many archives of [[Talk:Superpower]], where the great\/major powers were originally listed: Italy was never even discussed. Now all of a sudden new users with ONE CONTRIBUTION are telling us we are making Wikipedia worse. These users are obviously not new. ''' +++$+++ It's getting monotonous. Considering it's the same person again and again. In one archive of [[Talk:Major power]] and many archives of [[Talk:Superpower]], where the great/major powers were originally listed: Italy was never even discussed. Now all of a sudden new users with ONE CONTRIBUTION are telling us we are making Wikipedia worse. These users are obviously not new. '''[[User:Nobleeagle|<font color="darkblue">Noble</font><font color="darkorange">eagle</font>]]''' [[User_talk:Nobleeagle|<font color="darkred"><font size="0.5"> (Talk)</font></font>]] 08:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
543109 +++$+++ JJx2 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543108 +++$+++ 543108 +++$+++ 2006-08-23 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.156347540E09 +++$+++ I think you two shoudl really get together sometime in real life.  Seriously.  +++$+++ :I think you two shoudl really get together sometime in real life.  Seriously. [[User:JJx2|JJx2]] 08:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
543110 +++$+++ Nobleeagle +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543108 +++$+++ 543109 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.156429260E09 +++$+++ Why is it that whenever we have these include-Italy debates, the protagonists in the add-Italy group are unable to keep civil? ''' +++$+++ ::Why is it that whenever we have these include-Italy debates, the protagonists in the add-Italy group are unable to keep civil? '''[[User:Nobleeagle|<font color="darkblue">Noble</font><font color="darkorange">eagle</font>]]''' [[User_talk:Nobleeagle|<font color="darkred"><font size="0.5"> (Talk)</font></font>]] 07:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
543111 +++$+++ JJx2 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543108 +++$+++ 543110 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.156435740E09 +++$+++ So bringing up India means we all have become uncivil?  Pointing out you two collude on this page is uncivil?  Interesting.  +++$+++ :::So bringing up India means we all have become uncivil?  Pointing out you two collude on this page is uncivil?  Interesting. [[User:JJx2|JJx2]] 09:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

18821 +++$+++ S 400 HYBRID +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18821 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-15 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.266279420E09 +++$+++ Thanks and best regards... --  +++$+++ Thanks and best regards... -- [[User:S 400 HYBRID|S 400 HYBRID]] ([[User talk:S 400 HYBRID|talk]]) 16:17, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
18822 +++$+++ S 400 HYBRID +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18821 +++$+++ 18821 +++$+++ 2010-02-15 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.266288720E09 +++$+++ I've answered [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Matthias93 here]. --  +++$+++ :I've answered [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Matthias93 here]. -- [[User:S 400 HYBRID|S 400 HYBRID]] ([[User talk:S 400 HYBRID|talk]]) 18:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
18823 +++$+++ S 400 HYBRID +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18821 +++$+++ 18822 +++$+++ 2010-02-15 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.266295200E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot. I've weaved all the new pictures into the articles. --  +++$+++ ::Thanks a lot. I've weaved all the new pictures into the articles. -- [[User:S 400 HYBRID|S 400 HYBRID]] ([[User talk:S 400 HYBRID|talk]]) 20:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
18824 +++$+++ S 400 HYBRID +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18821 +++$+++ 18823 +++$+++ 2010-02-15 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.266296160E09 +++$+++ All right, it's late now - here in Germany. Thanks again. I let you know, if I have any other wishes. Good night ;) --  +++$+++ :::All right, it's late now - here in Germany. Thanks again. I let you know, if I have any other wishes. Good night ;) -- [[User:S 400 HYBRID|S 400 HYBRID]] ([[User talk:S 400 HYBRID|talk]]) 20:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

18825 +++$+++ S 400 HYBRID +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-16 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.266360180E09 +++$+++ I've new rear-end view wishes: 2009 Lincoln MKZ, 2010 Kia Rio Sedan, 2009+ Lincoln MKS, 2009+ Pontiac Vibe, 2009+ Volkswagen Routan, 2009+ Hyundai Genesis, Honda Odyssey RL3 facelift and pre-facelift, 2009+ Toyota Venza and the 2010 Kia Forte Koup. Furthermore 2009+ Ford Flex. So far, so good. Thanks. --  +++$+++ I've new rear-end view wishes: 2009 Lincoln MKZ, 2010 Kia Rio Sedan, 2009+ Lincoln MKS, 2009+ Pontiac Vibe, 2009+ Volkswagen Routan, 2009+ Hyundai Genesis, Honda Odyssey RL3 facelift and pre-facelift, 2009+ Toyota Venza and the 2010 Kia Forte Koup. Furthermore 2009+ Ford Flex. So far, so good. Thanks. -- [[User:S 400 HYBRID|S 400 HYBRID]] ([[User talk:S 400 HYBRID|talk]]) 14:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
18826 +++$+++ S 400 HYBRID +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18825 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-16 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.266375060E09 +++$+++ Please upload only the pictures you've at the moment. Thanks --  +++$+++ ::Please upload only the pictures you've at the moment. Thanks -- [[User:S 400 HYBRID|S 400 HYBRID]] ([[User talk:S 400 HYBRID|talk]]) 18:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
18827 +++$+++ S 400 HYBRID +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18825 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-19 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.266641280E09 +++$+++ One more question: Do you have a rear-end view of [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:2010_Volvo_XC60_--_09-08-2009.jpg this XC60]? If you have, please upload it. Thank you. -- +++$+++ :::One more question: Do you have a rear-end view of [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2010_Volvo_XC60_--_09-08-2009.jpg this XC60]? If you have, please upload it. Thank you. --[[User:S 400 HYBRID|S 400 HYBRID]] ([[User talk:S 400 HYBRID|talk]]) 20:48, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
18828 +++$+++ Pubdog +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18825 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.266663780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding pics from Langley Park ... much appreciated!-- +++$+++ ::::Thanks for adding pics from Langley Park ... much appreciated!--[[User:Pubdog|Pubdog]] ([[User talk:Pubdog|talk]]) 03:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
18829 +++$+++ S 400 HYBRID +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18825 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.266689340E09 +++$+++ Ok, upload the XC60 rear-end v. you've shown. Thanks --  +++$+++ ::::Ok, upload the XC60 rear-end v. you've shown. Thanks -- [[User:S 400 HYBRID|S 400 HYBRID]] ([[User talk:S 400 HYBRID|talk]]) 10:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
18830 +++$+++ S 400 HYBRID +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18825 +++$+++ 18825 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.268590620E09 +++$+++ Hay. I need a rear-end view of that car: [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File:2010_Suzuki_Kizashi_SE_3_--_03-13-2010.jpg click]. Thanks --  +++$+++ :Hay. I need a rear-end view of that car: [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2010_Suzuki_Kizashi_SE_3_--_03-13-2010.jpg click]. Thanks -- [[User:S 400 HYBRID|S 400 HYBRID]] ([[User talk:S 400 HYBRID|talk]]) 11:17, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
18831 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18825 +++$+++ 18830 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.268600640E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File:2010_Suzuki_Kizashi_SE_5_--_03-13-2010.jpg Done.]  +++$+++ ::[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2010_Suzuki_Kizashi_SE_5_--_03-13-2010.jpg Done.] [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] ([[User talk:IFCAR#top|talk]]) 14:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

543114 +++$+++ CQ +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543114 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-25 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.156554600E09 +++$+++ Hey man. Check out the changes on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States]]! You think we need more people? I do. How about a '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States\/News|newsletter]]''' and some announcements at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states\/Matrix|Regional Notice boards]] and [[Wikipedia:Community Portal|Community Bullitin board]]? Everybody else is doing it. Maybe we could have a membership drive. I added the \"[[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States#Special projects|Special projects]]\" section to beef things up a bit. Please follow suit. Don't leave me hangin' here, bro. Let's Work together! '''[[E Pluribus Unum]]!''' Thanks!  +++$+++ Hey man. Check out the changes on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States]]! You think we need more people? I do. How about a '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/News|newsletter]]''' and some announcements at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/Matrix|Regional Notice boards]] and [[Wikipedia:Community Portal|Community Bullitin board]]? Everybody else is doing it. Maybe we could have a membership drive. I added the "[[Wikipedia:WikiProject United States#Special projects|Special projects]]" section to beef things up a bit. Please follow suit. Don't leave me hangin' here, bro. Let's Work together! '''[[E Pluribus Unum]]!''' Thanks! [[User:CQ|CQ]] 18:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
543115 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543114 +++$+++ 543114 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.156582020E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'm still on vacation and despite my Wiki addiction am able to take a semi-WP break while on vacation. Anyways, I'll return next week in \"Full-force\" and will dedicate more attention to the US project. A newsletter is an excellent idea! Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Okay, I'm still on vacation and despite my Wiki addiction am able to take a semi-WP break while on vacation. Anyways, I'll return next week in "Full-force" and will dedicate more attention to the US project. A newsletter is an excellent idea! Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 01:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
543116 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543114 +++$+++ 543114 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.157445960E09 +++$+++ The image is no longer needed, so you can go ahead and delete it. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :The image is no longer needed, so you can go ahead and delete it. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 01:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

543117 +++$+++ Xdamr +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-04 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.157362080E09 +++$+++ Best wishes,  +++$+++ Best wishes, [[User:Xdamr|<span style="font-family: Times"><span style="font-size:18px">X</span><span style="font-size:14px">damr</span></span>]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Xdamr|talk]]</sup> 02:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
543118 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543117 +++$+++ 543117 +++$+++ 2006-09-08 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.157712360E09 +++$+++ No problem, we all have some of our POV show inadvertanly at some point or another. Thank you for telling me that you didn't mean to sound POV, I am personally a bit weary after so much deabte of people trying to push their POV, but its good to know that you're not one of them and that you edit in good faith. As for the EU's status I think we see I to eye on that. Happy editing! Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :No problem, we all have some of our POV show inadvertanly at some point or another. Thank you for telling me that you didn't mean to sound POV, I am personally a bit weary after so much deabte of people trying to push their POV, but its good to know that you're not one of them and that you edit in good faith. As for the EU's status I think we see I to eye on that. Happy editing! Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 03:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
543119 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543117 +++$+++ 543117 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.157445960E09 +++$+++ You may delete this picture as it is no longer needed. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :You may delete this picture as it is no longer needed. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 01:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

551797 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 551797 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-16 10:33:00 +++$+++ 1.140114780E09 +++$+++ Hello. I was quite interested to know why you deleted the [[Battle of Hogwarts]] article. The only records I have found show that this was nominated for deletion, with the result  'No consensus', yet the system now reports that you deleted it. Could you please un-delete it.  +++$+++ Hello. I was quite interested to know why you deleted the [[Battle of Hogwarts]] article. The only records I have found show that this was nominated for deletion, with the result  'No consensus', yet the system now reports that you deleted it. Could you please un-delete it. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 10:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
551798 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 551797 +++$+++ 551797 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.140116100E09 +++$+++ Aha, and further to the above. I have managed to trace the new deletion debate. Can you please advise where I can find the content deleted from this article, which pro-deleters claimed had already been moved somewhere else? It is certainly not in [[Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince]] article. As I do believe I had commented in the discussion page of the article (in answer to some of the deletion arguments made, before this deletion debate was started, but which you felt had not been responded to), the main objection here seems to be to the title of the article, rather than its content. I have never been hung up about the title, and would consider it much better to re-title to 'Dumbledore's Death', or whatever, but that in itself then becomes a rather awkward plot spoiler. The issue to me was that in fact the description of this article is relevant as expanded detail to many other articles, which now have blank links. This was the logic for maintaining it as a separate article and does not seem to have been addressed.  +++$+++ :Aha, and further to the above. I have managed to trace the new deletion debate. Can you please advise where I can find the content deleted from this article, which pro-deleters claimed had already been moved somewhere else? It is certainly not in [[Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince]] article. As I do believe I had commented in the discussion page of the article (in answer to some of the deletion arguments made, before this deletion debate was started, but which you felt had not been responded to), the main objection here seems to be to the title of the article, rather than its content. I have never been hung up about the title, and would consider it much better to re-title to 'Dumbledore's Death', or whatever, but that in itself then becomes a rather awkward plot spoiler. The issue to me was that in fact the description of this article is relevant as expanded detail to many other articles, which now have blank links. This was the logic for maintaining it as a separate article and does not seem to have been addressed. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 10:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
551799 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 551797 +++$+++ 551798 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.140142560E09 +++$+++ Thank you, yes that might be useful. (I say might, since I do not recall exactly the contents of the article, and don't know whether its last incarnation was as I recall it.) I think the best place for it might be as part of the HP&HBP article, but I also seem to recall suggesting to someone seeking to merge it there that actually it made rather more sense in the article about Dumbledore: it is, after all, his death. The problem is that it is relevant in quite a few places. I must admit, that my annoyance at its disappearance has more to do with wanting one complete description of the events concerned somewhere, rather than its admittedly slightly querky existence on its own. Its existence probably had quite a bit to do with sensitivity about his death at the time the book was published. But it is quite annoying when people have gone to the trouble of creating a useful description that it arbitrarily disappears without an opportunity to find it a home somewhere else.  +++$+++ :: Thank you, yes that might be useful. (I say might, since I do not recall exactly the contents of the article, and don't know whether its last incarnation was as I recall it.) I think the best place for it might be as part of the HP&HBP article, but I also seem to recall suggesting to someone seeking to merge it there that actually it made rather more sense in the article about Dumbledore: it is, after all, his death. The problem is that it is relevant in quite a few places. I must admit, that my annoyance at its disappearance has more to do with wanting one complete description of the events concerned somewhere, rather than its admittedly slightly querky existence on its own. Its existence probably had quite a bit to do with sensitivity about his death at the time the book was published. But it is quite annoying when people have gone to the trouble of creating a useful description that it arbitrarily disappears without an opportunity to find it a home somewhere else. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 18:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
551800 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 551797 +++$+++ 551798 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.140153300E09 +++$+++ Sorry, can't remember about having to provide a credit, since I do not know this in the first place. I have no intention of leaving it as a sub-page of mine in the future, so where exactly should I be referring anything back to? (or alternatively, where is all this explained?)  +++$+++ ::Sorry, can't remember about having to provide a credit, since I do not know this in the first place. I have no intention of leaving it as a sub-page of mine in the future, so where exactly should I be referring anything back to? (or alternatively, where is all this explained?) [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 21:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
551801 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 551797 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.140155880E09 +++$+++ Now funnily enough I was reading a page about quoting wiki material the other day. (which is not to say I remember where it was, but i expect it is findable again). It appeared to say something about it being satisfactory to quote the four main authors of the article, and leave it at that.? But you surprise me by suggesting that wiki does not merge and delete. i thought this was exactly what happened to pages from time time where it was felt the content should become part of a another article, but the original should be deleted.  +++$+++ ::::Now funnily enough I was reading a page about quoting wiki material the other day. (which is not to say I remember where it was, but i expect it is findable again). It appeared to say something about it being satisfactory to quote the four main authors of the article, and leave it at that.? But you surprise me by suggesting that wiki does not merge and delete. i thought this was exactly what happened to pages from time time where it was felt the content should become part of a another article, but the original should be deleted. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 21:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
551802 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 551797 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.140163740E09 +++$+++ Ah, well i understood it as being put forward to the reader as one interpretation of how the GNU text might be satisfied. Does this mean that wiki is by now littered with thousands (hundreds of thousands?) of redirects which it is impossible to delete?  +++$+++ :::::Ah, well i understood it as being put forward to the reader as one interpretation of how the GNU text might be satisfied. Does this mean that wiki is by now littered with thousands (hundreds of thousands?) of redirects which it is impossible to delete? [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 00:09, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

280975 +++$+++ Gsd2000 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280975 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-09 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.141903020E09 +++$+++ Hi - I added a comment to [[Image_talk:Spanish_Empire.png]].  Please let me know your thoughts on that page.  Thanks!   +++$+++ Hi - I added a comment to [[Image_talk:Spanish_Empire.png]].  Please let me know your thoughts on that page.  Thanks!  [[User:Gsd2000|Gsd2000]] 03:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
280976 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280975 +++$+++ 280975 +++$+++ 2006-03-09 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.141916940E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the comment. I have drafted and added my reply.  +++$+++ :Thank you for the comment. I have drafted and added my reply. [[User:Albrecht|Albrecht]] 07:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

543120 +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543120 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-13 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.158136620E09 +++$+++ That phrase, as it stands, is complete nonsense.  +++$+++ That phrase, as it stands, is complete nonsense. [[User:Joelr31|Joelito]] ([[User talk:Joelr31|talk]]) 01:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
543121 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543120 +++$+++ 543120 +++$+++ 2006-09-13 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.158137040E09 +++$+++ Okay that statisfies my curiosity, at least to some extend ;-) <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Okay that statisfies my curiosity, at least to some extend ;-) <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 01:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

280978 +++$+++ Andreas1968 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280978 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-14 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.142383320E09 +++$+++ Questioning numbers is evidence of 'Raging Bias'?  You are a credit to Wikipedia. If you are wondering about the decline of Wiki, it is responses such as yours to my comment on the Talk page of [[Battle of Krasny Bor]] that contribute to it. Have a nice day.  +++$+++ Questioning numbers is evidence of 'Raging Bias'?  You are a credit to Wikipedia. If you are wondering about the decline of Wiki, it is responses such as yours to my comment on the Talk page of [[Battle of Krasny Bor]] that contribute to it. Have a nice day. [[User:Andreas1968|Andreas]] 16:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
280979 +++$+++ Andreas1968 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280978 +++$+++ 280978 +++$+++ 2006-03-14 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.142385600E09 +++$+++ No worries, thanks for apologising, and as I said, I agree I should have chosen different words than I did.  Let's try to improve the article together from the very good start.  +++$+++ :No worries, thanks for apologising, and as I said, I agree I should have chosen different words than I did.  Let's try to improve the article together from the very good start. [[User:Andreas1968|Andreas]] 17:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

280980 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-18 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.142679420E09 +++$+++ Please do try to have ''some'' patience!  Alienating every Russian editor that wanders by isn't likely to be terribly productive in terms of actually improving the article; you're only causing an unnecessary defensive reflex on their part ;-) [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[User:Kirill Lokshin\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ Please do try to have ''some'' patience!  Alienating every Russian editor that wanders by isn't likely to be terribly productive in terms of actually improving the article; you're only causing an unnecessary defensive reflex on their part ;-) [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[User:Kirill Lokshin/Esperanza|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin|hin]] 02:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
280981 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280980 +++$+++ 280980 +++$+++ 2006-03-20 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.142887440E09 +++$+++ Eh, no problem; I think the situation has calmed down now, at least as far as the immediate edit war is concerned.   [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[User:Kirill Lokshin\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Eh, no problem; I think the situation has calmed down now, at least as far as the immediate edit war is concerned.   [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[User:Kirill Lokshin/Esperanza|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin|hin]] 12:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

571118 +++$+++ Glen S +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-05 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.162750920E09 +++$+++ No prob mate I have added these for you. Can you please clear your cache (hit CTRL-R) and then when you see some vandalism use the '''<font color=red>RED<\/font>''' revert link. This should open the vandals talk page and you should see an extra tab at the top next to history - see if that works :) Let me know if you like!  +++$+++ No prob mate I have added these for you. Can you please clear your cache (hit CTRL-R) and then when you see some vandalism use the '''<font color=red>RED</font>''' revert link. This should open the vandals talk page and you should see an extra tab at the top next to history - see if that works :) Let me know if you like! [[User talk:Glen S|'''Gl<font color="green">e</font>n''']] 10:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
571119 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571118 +++$+++ 571118 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.162798080E09 +++$+++ I like! Very cool. Thanks Glen, for both your time and consideration.  [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :I like! Very cool. Thanks Glen, for both your time and consideration.  [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 23:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

18839 +++$+++ S 400 HYBRID +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-20 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.279676220E09 +++$+++ Hey, it's me. I need a rear-end view of [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:2011_Infiniti_M56S_1_--_06-16-2010.jpg that] and\/or of [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:2011_Infiniti_M37X_2_--_06-16-2010.jpg that] Infiniti M. Thanks. Best wishes --  +++$+++ Hey, it's me. I need a rear-end view of [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2011_Infiniti_M56S_1_--_06-16-2010.jpg that] and/or of [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2011_Infiniti_M37X_2_--_06-16-2010.jpg that] Infiniti M. Thanks. Best wishes -- [[User:S 400 HYBRID|S 400 HYBRID]] ([[User talk:S 400 HYBRID|talk]]) 18:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
18840 +++$+++ S 400 HYBRID +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18839 +++$+++ 18839 +++$+++ 2010-08-06 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.281149040E09 +++$+++ Ok, thank you.... Sure :D --  +++$+++ :Ok, thank you.... Sure :D -- [[User:S 400 HYBRID|S 400 HYBRID]] ([[User talk:S 400 HYBRID|talk]]) 19:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
18841 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18839 +++$+++ 18839 +++$+++ 2010-07-23 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.279946280E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the courtesy of not reverting pre-discussion, by the way. This may be something we need to bring up on the main discussion page, as it would affect nearly every auto article if it needed to be changed.  +++$+++ :I appreciate the courtesy of not reverting pre-discussion, by the way. This may be something we need to bring up on the main discussion page, as it would affect nearly every auto article if it needed to be changed. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] ([[User talk:IFCAR#top|talk]]) 21:38, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
18842 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18839 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-31 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.280567220E09 +++$+++ If you are concerned, this would need to be addressed on a larger level than article-by-article, as a great many auto pages in Wikipedia have photos illustrating specific text even while there is an infobox there.  +++$+++ :::If you are concerned, this would need to be addressed on a larger level than article-by-article, as a great many auto pages in Wikipedia have photos illustrating specific text even while there is an infobox there. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] ([[User talk:IFCAR#top|talk]]) 02:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

18843 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18843 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-07 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.281204060E09 +++$+++ Well, considering that it's done throughout this project and that you consider it a problem, I suggest you bring up your concern where more users will notice it. Unless it only matters to you on this particular page for whatever reason.  +++$+++ Well, considering that it's done throughout this project and that you consider it a problem, I suggest you bring up your concern where more users will notice it. Unless it only matters to you on this particular page for whatever reason. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] ([[User talk:IFCAR#top|talk]]) 11:01, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
18844 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18843 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.282777320E09 +++$+++ I don't think piecemeal approach is very helpful and I simply do not share your concern.  +++$+++ ::I don't think piecemeal approach is very helpful and I simply do not share your concern. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] ([[User talk:IFCAR#top|talk]]) 16:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

585473 +++$+++ Orangemango +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-01 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.209632580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for semi protecting the page, those vandalizers were getting on my nerves. They all come from a particular chat room and got the brilliant idea that they would vandalize wikipedia. Thanks again,  +++$+++ Thanks for semi protecting the page, those vandalizers were getting on my nerves. They all come from a particular chat room and got the brilliant idea that they would vandalize wikipedia. Thanks again, [[User:Orangemango|Orangemango]] ([[User talk:Orangemango|talk]]) 02:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
585474 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585473 +++$+++ 585473 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.209632700E09 +++$+++ You're welcome for the protection.  +++$+++ :You're welcome for the protection. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 02:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

18845 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-26 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.282806420E09 +++$+++ Hey, there is discussion going on at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles#Assembly location]] about increasing the thumbnail size of the lead infobox image to 300 from the current 250 pixel size. Since you are heavily involved with images here, I though you might be interested in this discussion. <small> +++$+++ Hey, there is discussion going on at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles#Assembly location]] about increasing the thumbnail size of the lead infobox image to 300 from the current 250 pixel size. Since you are heavily involved with images here, I though you might be interested in this discussion. <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 00:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
18846 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18845 +++$+++ 18845 +++$+++ 2010-08-26 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.282853820E09 +++$+++ ''(moved from [[User talk:OSX]])'' I can't figure out what's going on where in that discussion, which is why I haven't really been following it. FWLIW, I think 300px is unnecessary from a photo perspective and that left-aligned thumbs are valuable, but it doesn't seem that the larger size has come up in the interest of illustrating the car as much as tidying the infoboxes.  +++$+++ :''(moved from [[User talk:OSX]])'' I can't figure out what's going on where in that discussion, which is why I haven't really been following it. FWLIW, I think 300px is unnecessary from a photo perspective and that left-aligned thumbs are valuable, but it doesn't seem that the larger size has come up in the interest of illustrating the car as much as tidying the infoboxes. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] ([[User talk:IFCAR|talk]]) 13:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
18847 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18845 +++$+++ 18846 +++$+++ 2010-08-30 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.283156760E09 +++$+++ You're right. The main reason for the change is to limit line overflow which is fairly common. The added benefit is obviously the larger image thumbnail. De Large has opened up a complaint about left-aligned images next to the infobox at WP:CARS already, but at the end of the day, if people are having major issues because they are running at the 800\xd7600 screen resolution, I think the onus is on them to upgrade their displays. [[Screen resolution#Current standards]] states that only 1 percent of Internet users are using 800\xd7600 resolutions. Even in the late 1990s, my then computer was running at 1024\xd7768 and that was about almost 12 years ago. <small> +++$+++ ::You're right. The main reason for the change is to limit line overflow which is fairly common. The added benefit is obviously the larger image thumbnail. De Large has opened up a complaint about left-aligned images next to the infobox at WP:CARS already, but at the end of the day, if people are having major issues because they are running at the 800×600 screen resolution, I think the onus is on them to upgrade their displays. [[Screen resolution#Current standards]] states that only 1 percent of Internet users are using 800×600 resolutions. Even in the late 1990s, my then computer was running at 1024×768 and that was about almost 12 years ago. <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 01:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
18848 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18845 +++$+++ 18847 +++$+++ 2010-08-30 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.283205600E09 +++$+++ I don't feel qualified to involve myself in a debate on the merits of screen resolutions or Wikipedia's various policies, so I may have to leave that part to you. And again, I don't feel like a thumb needs to be 300px to be easily visible, but I don't feel strongly on the issue as long as it's not at the expense of a left-aligned thumb.  +++$+++ :::I don't feel qualified to involve myself in a debate on the merits of screen resolutions or Wikipedia's various policies, so I may have to leave that part to you. And again, I don't feel like a thumb needs to be 300px to be easily visible, but I don't feel strongly on the issue as long as it's not at the expense of a left-aligned thumb. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] ([[User talk:IFCAR#top|talk]]) 15:00, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

280992 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-15 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.145158320E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that; I didn't realize someone had blanked it. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[User:Kirill Lokshin\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin\/Military history|<font color=\"#960018\">h<\/font>]] +++$+++ Sorry about that; I didn't realize someone had blanked it. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[User:Kirill Lokshin/Esperanza|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin/Military history|<font color="#960018">h</font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin|in]] 20:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
280993 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 280992 +++$+++ 280992 +++$+++ 2006-04-16 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.145175180E09 +++$+++ Fair enough (although the broader issue of present-day material being included within \"military history\" is one that I don't think we've fully resolved yet).  I suspect part of the problem is that people who work exclusively on the current events may not have had enough interaction with us to recognize our templates; maybe leaving links to [[WP:MILHIST]] in the edit summaries would help here. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[User:Kirill Lokshin\/Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin\/Military history|<font color=\"#960018\">h<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Fair enough (although the broader issue of present-day material being included within "military history" is one that I don't think we've fully resolved yet).  I suspect part of the problem is that people who work exclusively on the current events may not have had enough interaction with us to recognize our templates; maybe leaving links to [[WP:MILHIST]] in the edit summaries would help here. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lok]][[User:Kirill Lokshin/Esperanza|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin/Military history|<font color="#960018">h</font>]][[User:Kirill Lokshin|in]] 01:13, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

18849 +++$+++ LG Laptop +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-28 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.288322400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:LG Laptop|LG Laptop]] ([[User talk:LG Laptop|talk]]) 20:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
18850 +++$+++ LG Laptop +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18849 +++$+++ 18849 +++$+++ 2010-10-29 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.288388640E09 +++$+++ Thanks! :)  +++$+++ :Thanks! :) [[User:LG Laptop|LG Laptop]] ([[User talk:LG Laptop|talk]]) 14:44, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

18852 +++$+++ Ng.j +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18852 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-23 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.290568800E09 +++$+++ I think a lot of the anger directed towards you can be mitigated if you stated why something is lower quality, rather than just reverting without explanation. I agree with some of the changes in your history, but I would probably agree with many more of them if you made a better case for it. Otherwise, people will just see you as a bully, even though you do a lot of good work around here.  +++$+++ I think a lot of the anger directed towards you can be mitigated if you stated why something is lower quality, rather than just reverting without explanation. I agree with some of the changes in your history, but I would probably agree with many more of them if you made a better case for it. Otherwise, people will just see you as a bully, even though you do a lot of good work around here. [[User:Ng.j|Ng.j]] ([[User talk:Ng.j|talk]]) 19:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
18853 +++$+++ Ng.j +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18852 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-23 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.290580080E09 +++$+++ Cheers!  +++$+++ ::Cheers! [[User:Ng.j|Ng.j]] ([[User talk:Ng.j|talk]]) 22:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

543142 +++$+++ Koolgiy +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-17 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.161147780E09 +++$+++ Ya I noticed I messed up and reverted the change. My bad  +++$+++ Ya I noticed I messed up and reverted the change. My bad [[User:Koolgiy|Koolgiy]] 22:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
543143 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543142 +++$+++ 543142 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.161147840E09 +++$+++ No problem. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :No problem. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 22:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

308977 +++$+++ Black Kite +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-25 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.232948400E09 +++$+++ Hi, could you explain [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&diff=prev&oldid=266305907 this undo] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Intelligent_design&diff=prev&oldid=266306640 this comment], specifically in regard to how the book cover images pass [[WP:NFCC#8]]?  I have already asked on the ID talkpage, but perusing the archives I still don't see an answer to the question.  Thanks, <b> +++$+++ Hi, could you explain [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&diff=prev&oldid=266305907 this undo] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Intelligent_design&diff=prev&oldid=266306640 this comment], specifically in regard to how the book cover images pass [[WP:NFCC#8]]?  I have already asked on the ID talkpage, but perusing the archives I still don't see an answer to the question.  Thanks, <b>[[User talk:Black Kite|<font color="black">Black Kite</font>]]</b> 21:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
308978 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308977 +++$+++ 308977 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.232994600E09 +++$+++ Rather busy at least until 12 February, have put an immediate response [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AIntelligent_design&diff=266497379&oldid=266451770 here]. While I appreciate that you may want a rushed response and have tried to assist, note that this was re-raised just 22 hours before you posted this question here. . .  +++$+++ :Rather busy at least until 12 February, have put an immediate response [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AIntelligent_design&diff=266497379&oldid=266451770 here]. While I appreciate that you may want a rushed response and have tried to assist, note that this was re-raised just 22 hours before you posted this question here. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 10:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
308979 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308977 +++$+++ 308977 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.233022680E09 +++$+++ I'm not quite sure what you mean by that. I am ''very'' involved in the discussion on the talk page, and I am also discussing the issue elsewhere. I am continuing to remove the images on the (standard) grounds that, until there is consensus for inclusion, images should not be included. The burden of proof lies with those wishing to include the images- see [[WP:NFCC|the non-free content criteria]].  +++$+++ :I'm not quite sure what you mean by that. I am ''very'' involved in the discussion on the talk page, and I am also discussing the issue elsewhere. I am continuing to remove the images on the (standard) grounds that, until there is consensus for inclusion, images should not be included. The burden of proof lies with those wishing to include the images- see [[WP:NFCC|the non-free content criteria]]. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 18:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
308980 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308977 +++$+++ 308979 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.233027480E09 +++$+++ Response to NFCC issue raised on ID talk page. .  +++$+++ ::Response to NFCC issue raised on ID talk page. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 19:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
308981 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308977 +++$+++ 308980 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.233027780E09 +++$+++ I am discussing this, and I removed the images per the fact that there is no consensus for their inclusion, per the [[WP:NFCC|non-free content criteria]]. There's nothing wrong with either of those actions. I've really got no idea what you are talking about.  +++$+++ :::I am discussing this, and I removed the images per the fact that there is no consensus for their inclusion, per the [[WP:NFCC|non-free content criteria]]. There's nothing wrong with either of those actions. I've really got no idea what you are talking about. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 19:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
308982 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 308977 +++$+++ 308981 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.233033480E09 +++$+++ Your lack of comprehension is troubling. .  +++$+++ ::::Your lack of comprehension is troubling. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

543144 +++$+++  +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543144 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-19 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.161290460E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class=\"plainlinks\">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target={{PAGENAMEE}}&namespace=6}} this link]<\/span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. &ndash;  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target={{PAGENAMEE}}&namespace=6}} this link]</span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. &ndash; [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]]) ([[Special:Random|random]])</sup> 13:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
543145 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543144 +++$+++ 543144 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.161308100E09 +++$+++ The image is no longer needed so you can go ahead and delete it. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :The image is no longer needed so you can go ahead and delete it. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 18:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
543146 +++$+++ gerdbrendel +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543144 +++$+++ 543144 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.161496380E09 +++$+++ Again, this picture has served its purpose and may now be deleted. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Again, this picture has served its purpose and may now be deleted. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:gerdbrendel|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:gerdbrendel|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 22:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

18857 +++$+++ Reelcheeper +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-14 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.297754700E09 +++$+++ Also, in my image you can see the orange turn signal lights in the front and the wheels that were changed after 1992. I know you want to show the pre-facelift front end, but my image is much clearer and brighter. Do you still think your image should be the one shown in the article? \u2014 +++$+++ Also, in my image you can see the orange turn signal lights in the front and the wheels that were changed after 1992. I know you want to show the pre-facelift front end, but my image is much clearer and brighter. Do you still think your image should be the one shown in the article? —[[User:Reelcheeper|Reelcheeper]] ([[User talk:Reelcheeper|talk]]) 23:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
18858 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18857 +++$+++ 18857 +++$+++ 2011-02-14 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.297756140E09 +++$+++ Yes, I do think that two photos of showing the front end of the car (pre- and post-facelift) are the best way to illustrate a change in design. Perhaps there is a way to incorporate both, but the front view is critical.  +++$+++ :Yes, I do think that two photos of showing the front end of the car (pre- and post-facelift) are the best way to illustrate a change in design. Perhaps there is a way to incorporate both, but the front view is critical. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] ([[User talk:IFCAR#top|talk]]) 23:49, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
18859 +++$+++ Sable232 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18857 +++$+++ 18858 +++$+++ 2011-02-15 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.297842960E09 +++$+++ All in all the car's \"face\" is far, far more noticeable and notable than its taillights. -- +++$+++ ::All in all the car's "face" is far, far more noticeable and notable than its taillights. --[[User:Sable232|Sable232]] ([[User talk:Sable232|talk]]) 23:56, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

281004 +++$+++ PACO +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-06 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.154887260E09 +++$+++ Hello Albrecht: I would like to know where did you find the date of dead of [[Antonio Castej\xf3n Espinosa]] because I have been unable to find it in any Internet page. I think that 1969 is correct (I lived in Seville when he was general lieutenant of that military region) but I am not sure. I am loosing memory with the age ;-)). Thanks for your response.  +++$+++ Hello Albrecht: I would like to know where did you find the date of dead of [[Antonio Castejón Espinosa]] because I have been unable to find it in any Internet page. I think that 1969 is correct (I lived in Seville when he was general lieutenant of that military region) but I am not sure. I am loosing memory with the age ;-)). Thanks for your response. [[User:PACO|PACO]] 11:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
281005 +++$+++ PACO +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281004 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-09 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.155149340E09 +++$+++ Hi Albrecht, thanks for your response. I also have the book of Hugh Thomas (in Spanish), but maybe I passed too quickly over the data ;-)). I am thinking  to create the page about Castej\xf3n in Wikipedia in Spanish, but now I have a lot of familiar problems and I don't know when I'll have enough time for that. Thanks a lot again.  +++$+++ ::Hi Albrecht, thanks for your response. I also have the book of Hugh Thomas (in Spanish), but maybe I passed too quickly over the data ;-)). I am thinking  to create the page about Castejón in Wikipedia in Spanish, but now I have a lot of familiar problems and I don't know when I'll have enough time for that. Thanks a lot again. [[User:PACO|PACO]] 11:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

18861 +++$+++ Rwberndt +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18861 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-25 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.298691180E09 +++$+++ Will you consider updating these pages with current model photos on top? (use your own, most look fine, the monopoly issue is for your competition as photographers to object to)-- +++$+++ Will you consider updating these pages with current model photos on top? (use your own, most look fine, the monopoly issue is for your competition as photographers to object to)--[[User:Rwberndt|Rwberndt]] ([[User talk:Rwberndt|talk]]) 19:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
18862 +++$+++ Rwberndt +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18861 +++$+++ 18861 +++$+++ 2011-02-26 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.298764200E09 +++$+++ Per your suggestion, I have started by detailing the rationale for changes to the top infobox photo on [[Chrysler Town & Country]], [[Chrysler 300]], and [[Jeep Wrangler]] discussion pages. The argument is based upon [[WP:CARPIX]] exclusively. While I wait to see what if any action results, why don't you apply your skill and talent to obtain more pics of the restyled charger - in a few months, when we get into summer and hopefully this gas crisis passes, you will see why they are needed, especially in the top infobox. (suggestion : get a good pic of the 2012 SRT proto at a car show)-- +++$+++ :Per your suggestion, I have started by detailing the rationale for changes to the top infobox photo on [[Chrysler Town & Country]], [[Chrysler 300]], and [[Jeep Wrangler]] discussion pages. The argument is based upon [[WP:CARPIX]] exclusively. While I wait to see what if any action results, why don't you apply your skill and talent to obtain more pics of the restyled charger - in a few months, when we get into summer and hopefully this gas crisis passes, you will see why they are needed, especially in the top infobox. (suggestion : get a good pic of the 2012 SRT proto at a car show)--[[User:Rwberndt|Rwberndt]] ([[User talk:Rwberndt|talk]]) 15:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

18863 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-09 08:47:00 +++$+++ 1.299689220E09 +++$+++ Regards. <small> +++$+++ Regards. <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 08:47, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
18864 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18863 +++$+++ 18863 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.299716640E09 +++$+++ I can put on the more exact links; I just have to find them again. They're buried deep in the site with a collection of technical reports.  +++$+++ :I can put on the more exact links; I just have to find them again. They're buried deep in the site with a collection of technical reports. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] ([[User talk:IFCAR#top|talk]]) 16:24, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
18865 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18863 +++$+++ 18864 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.299870720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the links. I noticed many have rear three-quarter views as well, do you plan on uploading those? <small> +++$+++ ::Thanks for the links. I noticed many have rear three-quarter views as well, do you plan on uploading those? <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 11:12, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
18866 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18863 +++$+++ 18865 +++$+++ 2011-03-11 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.299878820E09 +++$+++ I must warn you though, that site is a real mess. Sometimes the pre-crash photos are buried in the back of a listing, or in the middle; sometimes the thumbnails showing which photos are which are broken; very often the photo is at 640x480 size or smaller; and very often the car is at a poor angle or has terrible lighting.  +++$+++ :::I must warn you though, that site is a real mess. Sometimes the pre-crash photos are buried in the back of a listing, or in the middle; sometimes the thumbnails showing which photos are which are broken; very often the photo is at 640x480 size or smaller; and very often the car is at a poor angle or has terrible lighting. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] ([[User talk:IFCAR#top|talk]]) 13:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
18867 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18863 +++$+++ 18866 +++$+++ 2011-03-12 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.299931080E09 +++$+++ I've just finished [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?limit=500&user=OSX+II&title=Special%3AListFiles uploading a bunch by brand]. BMW, Chrysler (Dodge\/Jeep) and Daimler (Mercedes-Benz\/Smart) are now complete, as noted on the table to the right. I would be more than happy to continue the uploads ''by brand'' over several months, starting with the useable ''1990\u20132010'' images and then moving onto the decent ''2011'' images. I am going to continue uploading the images unedited, allowing those who want to use a particular image to do the editing themselves. <small> +++$+++ ::::I've just finished [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?limit=500&user=OSX+II&title=Special%3AListFiles uploading a bunch by brand]. BMW, Chrysler (Dodge/Jeep) and Daimler (Mercedes-Benz/Smart) are now complete, as noted on the table to the right. I would be more than happy to continue the uploads ''by brand'' over several months, starting with the useable ''1990–2010'' images and then moving onto the decent ''2011'' images. I am going to continue uploading the images unedited, allowing those who want to use a particular image to do the editing themselves. <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 03:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
18868 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18863 +++$+++ 18867 +++$+++ 2011-03-12 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.299965580E09 +++$+++ Sounds good. I'll upload the ones of those I've already cropped and color balanced as new versions.  +++$+++ :::::Sounds good. I'll upload the ones of those I've already cropped and color balanced as new versions. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] ([[User talk:IFCAR#top|talk]]) 13:33, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

281008 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281008 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-02 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.157259540E09 +++$+++ Personally, I don't think it's a good idea, since the conflicts don't really form a logical sequence, but merely a geographic one.  One rule of thumb that might be useful is to consider whether a coherent article about the \"group\" of conflicts could be written; in other words, would [[Spanish-Moroccan Wars]] be a mere list of conflicts, or could it be dealt with as a single larger \"conflict\" that happens to be broken into stages.  If it's the former, having a navigation template is probably not all that useful; the last thing we want is to have a campaignbox for every pair of countries that has found themselves on opposite sides of a war (e.g. {{tl|Campaignbox Anglo-French Wars}}).  +++$+++ Personally, I don't think it's a good idea, since the conflicts don't really form a logical sequence, but merely a geographic one.  One rule of thumb that might be useful is to consider whether a coherent article about the "group" of conflicts could be written; in other words, would [[Spanish-Moroccan Wars]] be a mere list of conflicts, or could it be dealt with as a single larger "conflict" that happens to be broken into stages.  If it's the former, having a navigation template is probably not all that useful; the last thing we want is to have a campaignbox for every pair of countries that has found themselves on opposite sides of a war (e.g. {{tl|Campaignbox Anglo-French Wars}}). [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 21:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
281009 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281008 +++$+++ 281008 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.157261820E09 +++$+++ Ah, ok; something like \"Spanish colonial wars in Morocco\" seems rather more reasonable, since there's actually a common theme beyond the two sides involved.  The fact that the participants may vary shouldn't play into it too much; even for the obvious series of wars (e.g. the Napoleonic Wars), there tends to be a lot of variation in that regard.  +++$+++ :Ah, ok; something like "Spanish colonial wars in Morocco" seems rather more reasonable, since there's actually a common theme beyond the two sides involved.  The fact that the participants may vary shouldn't play into it too much; even for the obvious series of wars (e.g. the Napoleonic Wars), there tends to be a lot of variation in that regard. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 22:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

543153 +++$+++ David Kernow +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543153 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.163114100E09 +++$+++ Looking at the history, I guess it must've been me who deleted these parameters &ndash; if so, it was entirely unintentional and I apologiz\/se for my error (probably due to careless copy\/pasting). I agree that nominal GDP figures are a worthy addition, so I hope all now restored. Best wishes,  +++$+++ Looking at the history, I guess it must've been me who deleted these parameters &ndash; if so, it was entirely unintentional and I apologiz/se for my error (probably due to careless copy/pasting). I agree that nominal GDP figures are a worthy addition, so I hope all now restored. Best wishes, [[User:David Kernow|David Kernow]] <span style="font-size:90%;">([[User talk:David Kernow|talk]])</span> 15:15, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
543154 +++$+++ David Kernow +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543153 +++$+++ 543153 +++$+++ 2006-11-10 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.163158980E09 +++$+++ When I realized what had happened, I sympathized with how it must've seemed! &nbsp;Thanks for your reply,  +++$+++ : When I realized what had happened, I sympathized with how it must've seemed! &nbsp;Thanks for your reply, [[User:David Kernow|David]] <span style="font-size:90%;">([[User talk:David Kernow|talk]])</span> 03:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

281011 +++$+++ Mike McGregor (Can) +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-22 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.158956760E09 +++$+++ If you concerned about the ratio of articles dealing with French victories to British victories, why not flesh-out more articles dealing with French victories or created some stubs on battles or skirmishes that aren't yet a part of the 'pedia? Blanking and redirecting pages that don't fit with your agenda smacks of [[WP:POINT]], and I would ask you to stop because it's a bit disruptive and not very constructive.  +++$+++ If you concerned about the ratio of articles dealing with French victories to British victories, why not flesh-out more articles dealing with French victories or created some stubs on battles or skirmishes that aren't yet a part of the 'pedia? Blanking and redirecting pages that don't fit with your agenda smacks of [[WP:POINT]], and I would ask you to stop because it's a bit disruptive and not very constructive. [[User:Mike McGregor (Can)|Mike McGregor (Can)]] 13:26, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
281012 +++$+++ UberCryxic +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281011 +++$+++ 281011 +++$+++ 2006-10-30 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.162212780E09 +++$+++ The article is fairly ridiculous, I must admit. It speaks of a \"siege,\" but nothing notable actually happened. If you want a real siege, see the [[Siege of Paris]] in 1870-1871. I don't see why someone could not use this article as precedent for creating other articles with the harmless fall of cities.....like \"Surrender of London (1066)\" or \"Surrender of Berlin (1806).\" Just opens up an uncomfortable can of worms. I'd personally support for deletion if it came up, but I don't think it would succeed. +++$+++ :The article is fairly ridiculous, I must admit. It speaks of a "siege," but nothing notable actually happened. If you want a real siege, see the [[Siege of Paris]] in 1870-1871. I don't see why someone could not use this article as precedent for creating other articles with the harmless fall of cities.....like "Surrender of London (1066)" or "Surrender of Berlin (1806)." Just opens up an uncomfortable can of worms. I'd personally support for deletion if it came up, but I don't think it would succeed.[[User:UberCryxic|UberCryxic]] 04:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

543157 +++$+++ Psychohistorian +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-21 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.164168180E09 +++$+++ There is NO WAY you can argue that the information you claim describes white people describes the Bai.  The information in the template is flat out wrong and\/or ethnocentric and, in any event, is unsourced.  I will not violate the 3RR, but I will continue to remove this content.- +++$+++ There is NO WAY you can argue that the information you claim describes white people describes the Bai.  The information in the template is flat out wrong and/or ethnocentric and, in any event, is unsourced.  I will not violate the 3RR, but I will continue to remove this content.-[[User:Psychohistorian|Psychohistorian]] 20:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
543158 +++$+++ Psychohistorian +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543157 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.164170760E09 +++$+++ You have now violated the 3RR rule.  I expect you to revert quickly.- +++$+++ ::You have now violated the 3RR rule.  I expect you to revert quickly.-[[User:Psychohistorian|Psychohistorian]] 20:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
543159 +++$+++ Psychohistorian +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543157 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.164170880E09 +++$+++ As for an RfC, I welcome it.  Unverified, wrong, misleading information is -not- helpful to any reader.- +++$+++ ::As for an RfC, I welcome it.  Unverified, wrong, misleading information is -not- helpful to any reader.-[[User:Psychohistorian|Psychohistorian]] 20:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
543160 +++$+++  +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543157 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.164171840E09 +++$+++ The information is backed by an authorative source and very helpful. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ ::::The information is backed by an authorative source and very helpful. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b><small>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/BrendelSignature|Now under review!]]</small> 21:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

281014 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-12 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.160650320E09 +++$+++ Please, mate, look into my reasons and let me know what you think: I am hoping you reconsider this matter. As I say above, I am no nationalist of any kind and I am only trying to add some interesting information here, really.  +++$+++ Please, mate, look into my reasons and let me know what you think: I am hoping you reconsider this matter. As I say above, I am no nationalist of any kind and I am only trying to add some interesting information here, really. [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] 03:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
281015 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281014 +++$+++ 281014 +++$+++ 2006-10-12 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.160652240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your fast feedback, Albrecht. Well, indeed I think your revert was quite drastic, but I see no problem -and actually agree- with your point of taking things out of the introduction. Also you are right that, to some extent, a few of my remarks were a bit redundant, even though I still wish to make clear the interesting fact that the Crown of Arag\xf3n institutions kept working after uniting with Spain (this is an interesting fact which, besides, proves the Catalan nationalists that \"Spain\" doesn't necessarily mean lack of self-government, as they want to stress). I may come back to this article again with similar views, but detailed in a different way. I hope you will agree with those, since, as I said, I am actually not trying by any means to endorse the Catalan nationalist view.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your fast feedback, Albrecht. Well, indeed I think your revert was quite drastic, but I see no problem -and actually agree- with your point of taking things out of the introduction. Also you are right that, to some extent, a few of my remarks were a bit redundant, even though I still wish to make clear the interesting fact that the Crown of Aragón institutions kept working after uniting with Spain (this is an interesting fact which, besides, proves the Catalan nationalists that "Spain" doesn't necessarily mean lack of self-government, as they want to stress). I may come back to this article again with similar views, but detailed in a different way. I hope you will agree with those, since, as I said, I am actually not trying by any means to endorse the Catalan nationalist view. [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] 04:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
281016 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281014 +++$+++ 281015 +++$+++ 2006-10-12 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.160658240E09 +++$+++ I have made a zillion little edits trying to make the history section more lineal and consistent than the previous version, hope that you agree. I guess it could look better, but it's time to go bed now.  +++$+++ ::I have made a zillion little edits trying to make the history section more lineal and consistent than the previous version, hope that you agree. I guess it could look better, but it's time to go bed now. [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] 06:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

18871 +++$+++ Bull-Doser +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18871 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-27 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311828660E09 +++$+++ Hi, this is Bull-Doser here.  It was your 5th anniversary on July 15th.  I've had my 5th anniversary in February.  Can we meet 8am-10am @ DoubleTree Hotel on 1515 Rhode Island Ave., NW in Washington D.C. on August 1st?? Currently I am in [[Virginia Beach]] and I am coming to D.C. on that date. --  +++$+++ Hi, this is Bull-Doser here.  It was your 5th anniversary on July 15th.  I've had my 5th anniversary in February.  Can we meet 8am-10am @ DoubleTree Hotel on 1515 Rhode Island Ave., NW in Washington D.C. on August 1st?? Currently I am in [[Virginia Beach]] and I am coming to D.C. on that date. -- [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]] ([[User talk:Bull-Doser|talk]]) 21:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
18872 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18871 +++$+++ 18871 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311837960E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I'll be at work.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I'll be at work. [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] ([[User talk:IFCAR#top|talk]]) 00:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
18873 +++$+++ Bull-Doser +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18871 +++$+++ 18872 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.312085220E09 +++$+++ Where can I meet you tomorrow even though I'm headed to D.C.??? --  +++$+++ ::Where can I meet you tomorrow even though I'm headed to D.C.??? -- [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]] ([[User talk:Bull-Doser|talk]]) 21:07, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
18874 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ 18871 +++$+++ 18873 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.312094280E09 +++$+++ Sorry to encroach into this conversation, but this page is still on my watchlist from an earlier discussion. Bull-Doser, I would of thought you would have taken the hint the first time\u2014IFCAR probably doesn't want to meet up with you. I'm sorry to sound so blunt but it needs to be said\u2014and I'm sure you've put IFCAR in an awkward position by asking. I don't believe IFCAR has anything against you, but most users prefer to keep their private lives separate from this project. So as a matter from courtesy, please accept IFCAR's original response and leave him be. Thank you, <small> +++$+++ :::Sorry to encroach into this conversation, but this page is still on my watchlist from an earlier discussion. Bull-Doser, I would of thought you would have taken the hint the first time—IFCAR probably doesn't want to meet up with you. I'm sorry to sound so blunt but it needs to be said—and I'm sure you've put IFCAR in an awkward position by asking. I don't believe IFCAR has anything against you, but most users prefer to keep their private lives separate from this project. So as a matter from courtesy, please accept IFCAR's original response and leave him be. Thank you, <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 23:38, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

543161 +++$+++ LUCPOL +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-22 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.164183360E09 +++$+++ This user fights with truth. It is possible to infer with his relating superpower editions this user. Xdam leads with several writing truth persons editorial war. USA is really superpower but China, Russia, India, Brasil and European Union is emerging superpowers!  +++$+++ This user fights with truth. It is possible to infer with his relating superpower editions this user. Xdam leads with several writing truth persons editorial war. USA is really superpower but China, Russia, India, Brasil and European Union is emerging superpowers! [[User:LUCPOL|LUCPOL]] 00:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
543162 +++$+++ Xdamr +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543161 +++$+++ 543161 +++$+++ 2006-11-22 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.164190440E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Xdamr|<span style="font-family: Times"><span style="font-size:18px">X</span><span style="font-size:14px">damr</span></span>]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Xdamr|talk]]</sup> 02:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
543163 +++$+++  +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543161 +++$+++ 543162 +++$+++ 2006-11-22 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164191640E09 +++$+++ Mmm... now there's an idea. I have had a lot of crazy accusations made against me as well; perhaps we should start a new user page trend ;-) <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ ::Mmm... now there's an idea. I have had a lot of crazy accusations made against me as well; perhaps we should start a new user page trend ;-) <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b><small>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/BrendelSignature|Now under review!]]</small> 02:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

281018 +++$+++ Raymond Palmer +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-24 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.161745980E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Raymond Palmer|Raymond Palmer]] 20:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
281019 +++$+++ Raymond Palmer +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281018 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-27 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.162001940E09 +++$+++ You're not pestering me at all, please comment\/discuss as often as you see fit, it's very helpful.  +++$+++ ::You're not pestering me at all, please comment/discuss as often as you see fit, it's very helpful. [[User:Raymond Palmer|Raymond Palmer]] 19:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

281020 +++$+++ Carl Logan +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281020 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-27 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.162005000E09 +++$+++ I have created a references section instead of further reading section in the Penunsular war article. I added Chandlers Campaigns of Napoleon and Gates The Spanish Ulcer, because I assumed this is the two books you use in the notes.  +++$+++ I have created a references section instead of further reading section in the Penunsular war article. I added Chandlers Campaigns of Napoleon and Gates The Spanish Ulcer, because I assumed this is the two books you use in the notes. [[User:Carl Logan|Carl Logan]] 20:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
281021 +++$+++ UberCryxic +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281020 +++$+++ 281020 +++$+++ 2006-10-29 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.162191120E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for your request. I've now given the article a copyedit. Look over it and see if you like it. +++$+++ :Hey, thanks for your request. I've now given the article a copyedit. Look over it and see if you like it.[[User:UberCryxic|UberCryxic]] 22:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

265290 +++$+++ Jersey Devil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265290 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-26 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.148707740E09 +++$+++ Try going to \"my preferences\" in the \"user profile\" section you will see a checkbox that says \"raw signature\". If it is checked off that is why the link to your userpage is not showing up when you click for your sig to show up, so uncheck it and press the save button.-- +++$+++ Try going to "my preferences" in the "user profile" section you will see a checkbox that says "raw signature". If it is checked off that is why the link to your userpage is not showing up when you click for your sig to show up, so uncheck it and press the save button.--[[User:Jersey Devil|Jersey Devil]] 22:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
265291 +++$+++ Jersey Devil +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265290 +++$+++ 265290 +++$+++ 2006-05-26 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.148708100E09 +++$+++ P.S. I see that you seem to be interested in many Cuban government articles. I have been expanding a bit of the [[Ricardo Alarc\xf3n de Quesada]] article which you might be interested in helping on. But please don't do the c&p you did on the Frank Pais article, because to alot of editors that type of editting just really looks unencyclopedic. Instead you should add bits from difference resources one step at a time. I'm just saying this because I was seeing your pretty damn good edits on the Castro and other Cuban-related pages and was shocked to see that c&p. Anyway, later and hope to see your around.-- +++$+++ :P.S. I see that you seem to be interested in many Cuban government articles. I have been expanding a bit of the [[Ricardo Alarcón de Quesada]] article which you might be interested in helping on. But please don't do the c&p you did on the Frank Pais article, because to alot of editors that type of editting just really looks unencyclopedic. Instead you should add bits from difference resources one step at a time. I'm just saying this because I was seeing your pretty damn good edits on the Castro and other Cuban-related pages and was shocked to see that c&p. Anyway, later and hope to see your around.--[[User:Jersey Devil|Jersey Devil]] 22:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

543167 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.168140600E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user={{PAGENAMEE}}}} this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags\/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 19:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user={{PAGENAMEE}}}} this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 19:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. [[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 19:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
543168 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543167 +++$+++ 543167 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.168140960E09 +++$+++ I added the source- it's a US gov web-site and graph was compline by the gov; thus it was released into the free domain. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I added the source- it's a US gov web-site and graph was compline by the gov; thus it was released into the free domain. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 19:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

281024 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281024 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.163901960E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, I don't really have any influence on Commons policy, so there's not much I can do at the source of the problem.  My advice would be to simply upload the image(s) directly to en:Wikipedia, where the Commons admins can't get to them.  +++$+++ Unfortunately, I don't really have any influence on Commons policy, so there's not much I can do at the source of the problem.  My advice would be to simply upload the image(s) directly to en:Wikipedia, where the Commons admins can't get to them. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 18:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
281025 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281024 +++$+++ 281024 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.163912880E09 +++$+++ My guess is that, when the image was moved to Commons, our local copy was deleted; you may need to upload it here again if we want it to stay regardless of what happens to the Commons one.  +++$+++ :My guess is that, when the image was moved to Commons, our local copy was deleted; you may need to upload it here again if we want it to stay regardless of what happens to the Commons one. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 21:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

543169 +++$+++ gwernol +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543169 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-25 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.169716380E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.png|25px]] Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits {{{{{subst|}}}#if:United States|, as you are doing in [[:United States]]}}. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. The [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit warring]], even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- {{uw-3rr1}} -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.png|25px]] Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits {{{{{subst|}}}#if:United States|, as you are doing in [[:United States]]}}. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. The [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit warring]], even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- {{uw-3rr1}} --> [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 01:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
543170 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543169 +++$+++ 543169 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.169716440E09 +++$+++ Well I wasn't reverting, the sentence has changed multiple times and if you check the history you'll see that this particular paragraph has evolved and we have actually come close to finding the best way of saying things. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Well I wasn't reverting, the sentence has changed multiple times and if you check the history you'll see that this particular paragraph has evolved and we have actually come close to finding the best way of saying things. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 01:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

18883 +++$+++ Skookum1 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-29 08:16:00 +++$+++ 1.296317760E09 +++$+++ These are not a single forest, they are a group of forests, not just geographically but also by type....which is why the WWF titles their names \"forests\" in the plural.  [[WP:MOSFOLLOW]] applies - \"follow the sources\".  Please revert your page-moves, they were incorrect. +++$+++ These are not a single forest, they are a group of forests, not just geographically but also by type....which is why the WWF titles their names "forests" in the plural.  [[WP:MOSFOLLOW]] applies - "follow the sources".  Please revert your page-moves, they were incorrect.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 08:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
18884 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18883 +++$+++ 18883 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.296318000E09 +++$+++ I think you should long before have done the redirects yourself (or your staff in the project you are in) to avoid people to move the pages in the singular as it is the regular form for article titles. -- +++$+++ : I think you should long before have done the redirects yourself (or your staff in the project you are in) to avoid people to move the pages in the singular as it is the regular form for article titles. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 08:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
18885 +++$+++ Skookum1 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18883 +++$+++ 18884 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 09:48:00 +++$+++ 1.296323280E09 +++$+++ Regular form?  ''The regular form is that which is used by the source designating this term''.  YOu are wildly off-base here; read the citations on the article, read the article, don't just blindly follow what you ''think'' is a \"rule\"....it's not.  It doens't help that \"wiki lower-case-ism\", as I call it, turned what are ''titles'' and ''names'' conferred by a particular organization into what ''seem'' like are generic terms (but are not).  [[WP:MOSFOLLOW]] is VERY CLEAR - \"follow the sources\".  The same is in [[WP:TITLE]].  You have created a \"new term\", the idea that the Pacific temperate coastal rainforest ecoregion is ONE forest.  It is NOT (I know, I live there), it is ''many'' forestS. +++$+++ ::Regular form?  ''The regular form is that which is used by the source designating this term''.  YOu are wildly off-base here; read the citations on the article, read the article, don't just blindly follow what you ''think'' is a "rule"....it's not.  It doens't help that "wiki lower-case-ism", as I call it, turned what are ''titles'' and ''names'' conferred by a particular organization into what ''seem'' like are generic terms (but are not).  [[WP:MOSFOLLOW]] is VERY CLEAR - "follow the sources".  The same is in [[WP:TITLE]].  You have created a "new term", the idea that the Pacific temperate coastal rainforest ecoregion is ONE forest.  It is NOT (I know, I live there), it is ''many'' forestS.[[User:Skookum1|Skookum1]] ([[User talk:Skookum1|talk]]) 09:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
18886 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18883 +++$+++ 18885 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.296325800E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm sorry to have put you in such a bad mood. I will nevertheless try to apologise fot the mess. I hope your week-end won't be all messed up. Cheers. -- +++$+++ ::: Well, I'm sorry to have put you in such a bad mood. I will nevertheless try to apologise fot the mess. I hope your week-end won't be all messed up. Cheers. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 10:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

543173 +++$+++ Danielrocks123 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543173 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.168587300E09 +++$+++ I apologize if I accidentally caused an edit conflict when I edited [[Average Joe]].  I'm afraid I didn't notice the warning until it was too late.  Regards.  -- +++$+++ I apologize if I accidentally caused an edit conflict when I edited [[Average Joe]].  I'm afraid I didn't notice the warning until it was too late.  Regards.  --[[User:Danielrocks123|דניאל - Danielr]]'''[[User talk:Danielrocks123|ocks123]]''' <sup>[[Special:contributions/Danielrocks123|contribs]]</sup> 23:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
543174 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543173 +++$+++ 543173 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.168587420E09 +++$+++ Actually you didn't. You're timing was just right! Thank you for being so considerate. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Actually you didn't. You're timing was just right! Thank you for being so considerate. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 23:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
543175 +++$+++ Danielrocks123 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543173 +++$+++ 543174 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.168600860E09 +++$+++ Glad to hear it.  -- +++$+++ ::Glad to hear it.  --[[User:Danielrocks123|דניאל - Danielr]]'''[[User talk:Danielrocks123|ocks123]]''' <sup>[[Special:contributions/Danielrocks123|contribs]]</sup> 03:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

18887 +++$+++ Miguel.v +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-29 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.296346980E09 +++$+++ Please defer to [[WP:MOSFOLLOW]] for ecoregion names. They were defined in 2001 and are still widely used. For example, the 2010 [http:\/\/www.ucpress.edu\/book.php?isbn=9780520262560 Atlas of Global Conservation] uses them. They are also used in the scientific literature. See, for example, this recent paper on the [http:\/\/www.plosone.org\/article\/info:doi\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0008767 Napo moists forests] of the western Amazon. Changing their names on Wikipedia will create confusion and most likely result in the name changes gradually being reverted.   +++$+++ Please defer to [[WP:MOSFOLLOW]] for ecoregion names. They were defined in 2001 and are still widely used. For example, the 2010 [http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520262560 Atlas of Global Conservation] uses them. They are also used in the scientific literature. See, for example, this recent paper on the [http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0008767 Napo moists forests] of the western Amazon. Changing their names on Wikipedia will create confusion and most likely result in the name changes gradually being reverted.  [[User:Miguel.v|Miguel.v]] ([[User talk:Miguel.v|talk]]) 16:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
18888 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18887 +++$+++ 18887 +++$+++ 2011-02-04 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.296871920E09 +++$+++ Done. -- +++$+++ : Done. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 18:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

543176 +++$+++ IFCAR +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543176 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-25 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.169793420E09 +++$+++ I've noticed you've done the dropout effect a number of images now. I'd just like to add some constructive criticism, in that some are being cropped in too close (no distracting background to worry about, so not an issue) and that probably a white background would be more mature for an encyclopedia. Your thoughts?  +++$+++ I've noticed you've done the dropout effect a number of images now. I'd just like to add some constructive criticism, in that some are being cropped in too close (no distracting background to worry about, so not an issue) and that probably a white background would be more mature for an encyclopedia. Your thoughts? [[User:IFCAR|IFCAR]] 22:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
543177 +++$+++ Bull-Doser +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543176 +++$+++ 543176 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.169796420E09 +++$+++ Can you do it for the [[Lincoln Mark LT]]? -  +++$+++ :Can you do it for the [[Lincoln Mark LT]]? - [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]] 23:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
543178 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543176 +++$+++ 543177 +++$+++ 2007-01-25 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.169796540E09 +++$+++ Yes I'll try do to the LT w\/ a white background. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ ::Yes I'll try do to the LT w/ a white background. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 23:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
543179 +++$+++ Bull-Doser +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543176 +++$+++ 543178 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.169857260E09 +++$+++ Do it for the [[Lincoln MKX]] and most every other [[Lincoln automobile|Lincoln]]. --  +++$+++ :::Do it for the [[Lincoln MKX]] and most every other [[Lincoln automobile|Lincoln]]. -- [[User:Bull-Doser|Bull-Doser]] 16:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

537831 +++$+++ Dbachmann +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537831 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-30 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.180532760E09 +++$+++ thanks for helping babysit {{user|Nasz}}. He is pracitally into serial vandalism now. I don't have the time to throw around my weight right now, but if you have a minute, you could try to get some admin attention at [[WP:AN\/I]].  +++$+++ thanks for helping babysit {{user|Nasz}}. He is pracitally into serial vandalism now. I don't have the time to throw around my weight right now, but if you have a minute, you could try to get some admin attention at [[WP:AN/I]]. [[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|(𒁳)]]</small> 06:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
537832 +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ Aldux +++$+++ 537831 +++$+++ 537831 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.180772700E09 +++$+++ Sorry for haven't brought any contribution to the discussion, but real life occupations have been so intense and heavy this week that I've only known of the discussion when it had just finished. You have all my gratitude for fully bringing to the attention of the community the extent of the disruption caused by Nasz. Thanks again, +++$+++ :Sorry for haven't brought any contribution to the discussion, but real life occupations have been so intense and heavy this week that I've only known of the discussion when it had just finished. You have all my gratitude for fully bringing to the attention of the community the extent of the disruption caused by Nasz. Thanks again,[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 01:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

18891 +++$+++ Vindicata +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18891 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-08 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.297211100E09 +++$+++ I'm not exactly sure why you have undertaken the task of linking [[human eye]] for numerous articles, though I see how it is useful for certain articles pertaining to eye diseases, etc. However, I am concerned about your repetitive linking of human eye under the appearance of 'eye' for both [[cataract]] and [[lens (anatomy)]]. As I stated last week, in both articles the specific linking of human eye is misleading as cataract and crystalline lenses are not unique to humans. The [[eye]] article gives sufficient info about the subjects and does not imply that the subjects are unique to humans. I suggest considering the context of the use of 'eye' before making changes, and ask that you do not redo the edits I have reverted.  +++$+++ I'm not exactly sure why you have undertaken the task of linking [[human eye]] for numerous articles, though I see how it is useful for certain articles pertaining to eye diseases, etc. However, I am concerned about your repetitive linking of human eye under the appearance of 'eye' for both [[cataract]] and [[lens (anatomy)]]. As I stated last week, in both articles the specific linking of human eye is misleading as cataract and crystalline lenses are not unique to humans. The [[eye]] article gives sufficient info about the subjects and does not imply that the subjects are unique to humans. I suggest considering the context of the use of 'eye' before making changes, and ask that you do not redo the edits I have reverted. [[User:Vindicata|Vindicata]] ([[User talk:Vindicata|talk]]) 16:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
18892 +++$+++ Vindicata +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18891 +++$+++ 18891 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.297211580E09 +++$+++ I double-checked the [[cataract]] article and have noticed the article is written solely from the POV of human cataract so in this case, your link may be justified. I am planning on addressing the issue of POV in the article, possibly suggesting to change the article name to Human Cataract or indicating within the article that it refers to human cataract while adding a section such as 'In other species', etc. If you have any thoughts on this, I would appreciate the input.  +++$+++ :I double-checked the [[cataract]] article and have noticed the article is written solely from the POV of human cataract so in this case, your link may be justified. I am planning on addressing the issue of POV in the article, possibly suggesting to change the article name to Human Cataract or indicating within the article that it refers to human cataract while adding a section such as 'In other species', etc. If you have any thoughts on this, I would appreciate the input. [[User:Vindicata|Vindicata]] ([[User talk:Vindicata|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

543180 +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-29 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.170081960E09 +++$+++ What year are the data used in this image from? +++$+++ What year are the data used in this image from?[[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] 06:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
543181 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543180 +++$+++ 543180 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.170082320E09 +++$+++ The data for the [[:Image:Race_Income.png]] taken from [http:\/\/pubdb3.census.gov\/macro\/032006\/perinc\/new03_000.htm here (personal income stats)] and [http:\/\/pubdb3.census.gov\/macro\/032006\/hhinc\/new06_000.htm here (household income)]. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :The data for the [[:Image:Race_Income.png]] taken from [http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/perinc/new03_000.htm here (personal income stats)] and [http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/hhinc/new06_000.htm here (household income)]. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
543182 +++$+++ Futurebird +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543180 +++$+++ 543181 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.170082560E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'm having trouble adding that information to the caption of the image. I think it is important to show a date with this kind of information. The image is in a template and when I added the caption it's messed up the formatting. Can you help out? it's here [[Template:Race and income in US]] -- +++$+++ ::Thanks. I'm having trouble adding that information to the caption of the image. I think it is important to show a date with this kind of information. The image is in a template and when I added the caption it's messed up the formatting. Can you help out? it's here [[Template:Race and income in US]] --[[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] 06:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
543183 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543180 +++$+++ 543182 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.170082920E09 +++$+++ Well, quite frankly I don't know why the picture is in a template. I need to figure the syntax out myself but as it is 11:00 pm here in California that will have to wait until tomorrow (sorry). Maybe you'll beat me to it- if not I'm going to take another look at it tomorrow. Happy editing! <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :::Well, quite frankly I don't know why the picture is in a template. I need to figure the syntax out myself but as it is 11:00 pm here in California that will have to wait until tomorrow (sorry). Maybe you'll beat me to it- if not I'm going to take another look at it tomorrow. Happy editing! <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 07:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

18893 +++$+++ Looie496 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-17 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.298005140E09 +++$+++ Hi, lots of these changes make sense, but please give some thought to whether a given article is really specific to the human brain or refers to brains of nonhuman animals as well as humans.  I am finding a need to revert a substantial number of your changes.  Regards,  +++$+++ Hi, lots of these changes make sense, but please give some thought to whether a given article is really specific to the human brain or refers to brains of nonhuman animals as well as humans.  I am finding a need to revert a substantial number of your changes.  Regards, [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 20:59, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
18894 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 2011-02-17 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.298005320E09 +++$+++ Hi, please don't forget that most of anatomy related articles are tailored to human anatomy. In this sense, I think that most of my moves make sense. -- +++$+++ : Hi, please don't forget that most of anatomy related articles are tailored to human anatomy. In this sense, I think that most of my moves make sense. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 21:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
18895 +++$+++ Boghog +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 18894 +++$+++ 2011-02-17 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.298005800E09 +++$+++ Hi, I second Looie496's caution.  [[Gene Wiki]] articles are not only about the human gene\/protein, but also [[Homology_(biology)#Orthology|orthologs]] in other species.  Hence it generally is not appropriate to change links in these articles (for example [[reelin]]) from brain to human brain.  Regards,   +++$+++ :: Hi, I second Looie496's caution.  [[Gene Wiki]] articles are not only about the human gene/protein, but also [[Homology_(biology)#Orthology|orthologs]] in other species.  Hence it generally is not appropriate to change links in these articles (for example [[reelin]]) from brain to human brain.  Regards,  [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 21:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
18896 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 18895 +++$+++ 2011-02-17 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.298005860E09 +++$+++ Who really cares of animal reelin? Regards. -- +++$+++ ::: Who really cares of animal reelin? Regards. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 21:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
18897 +++$+++ Boghog +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 18896 +++$+++ 2011-02-17 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.298006100E09 +++$+++ Most of the studies on the function of reelin were done in animals and specifically mice.  Hence in this article, the change from brain to human brain is especially inappropriate.  +++$+++ :::: Most of the studies on the function of reelin were done in animals and specifically mice.  Hence in this article, the change from brain to human brain is especially inappropriate. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 21:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
18898 +++$+++ Tryptofish +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 18897 +++$+++ 2011-02-17 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.298007000E09 +++$+++ I have to agree with Looie and Boghog. It makes sense in a few cases ([[antipsychotic]]s are medicines for humans), but in a lot of cases the science doesn't go that way (regardless of whether or not a particular editor cares). -- +++$+++ :::::I have to agree with Looie and Boghog. It makes sense in a few cases ([[antipsychotic]]s are medicines for humans), but in a lot of cases the science doesn't go that way (regardless of whether or not a particular editor cares). --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 21:30, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
18899 +++$+++ Boghog +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 18898 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.298087940E09 +++$+++ Please reconsider the indiscriminate changing of [[brain]] to [[human brain]] links.  Thanks.   +++$+++ :::::: Please reconsider the indiscriminate changing of [[brain]] to [[human brain]] links.  Thanks.  [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 19:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
18900 +++$+++ Boghog +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 18899 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.298088720E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Vulcan_nerve_pinch&action=historysubmit&diff=414669175&oldid=412438683 Here] is another one that I have reverted:  ''Although usually used on humanoid beings, ... Spock successfully performs the pinch on a horse-like creature''. ;-)  +++$+++ ::::::: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vulcan_nerve_pinch&action=historysubmit&diff=414669175&oldid=412438683 Here] is another one that I have reverted:  ''Although usually used on humanoid beings, ... Spock successfully performs the pinch on a horse-like creature''. ;-) [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 20:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
18901 +++$+++ Edison +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 18900 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.298089380E09 +++$+++ Some of the edits where you have recently replaced old links to [[Brain]] with new links to [[Human brain]], like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Trauma_%28medicine%29&diff=414670543&oldid=413594218 here] in [[Trauma (medicine)]] seem pointless.  If you continue, you may be blocked from editing, since others have to spend their time going around and removing your unnecessary additions.  +++$+++ ::::::::Some of the edits where you have recently replaced old links to [[Brain]] with new links to [[Human brain]], like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trauma_%28medicine%29&diff=414670543&oldid=413594218 here] in [[Trauma (medicine)]] seem pointless.  If you continue, you may be blocked from editing, since others have to spend their time going around and removing your unnecessary additions. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 20:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
18902 +++$+++ DMacks +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.298089680E09 +++$+++ (outdent) Your edits are now at the level of [[WP:DE|disruption]] and will likely lead to a block of your edit privleges if you continue. Numerous editors have taken issue with what you are doing, yet you have not stopped. There is clearly no consensus that your edits are correct or that your headstrong approach is winning any converts to support your position. I have reverted your edit to [[stroke]], as this condition is well-known in a variety of other animals. Not just induced to study the human condition, but exactly the same naturally-occuring type of event and the same terminology is used to describe it.  +++$+++ :(outdent) Your edits are now at the level of [[WP:DE|disruption]] and will likely lead to a block of your edit privleges if you continue. Numerous editors have taken issue with what you are doing, yet you have not stopped. There is clearly no consensus that your edits are correct or that your headstrong approach is winning any converts to support your position. I have reverted your edit to [[stroke]], as this condition is well-known in a variety of other animals. Not just induced to study the human condition, but exactly the same naturally-occuring type of event and the same terminology is used to describe it. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 20:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
18903 +++$+++ Edison +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 18902 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.298090280E09 +++$+++ I have rolled back as vandalism your linkage to [[Human brain]] in the [[Engram (neuropsychology)]] article, since the article says correctly that Lashley unsuccessfully looked for engrams in the rat brain, while another researcher studied the rabbit brain. Many human brain functions and defects are studied in animal models.  +++$+++ ::I have rolled back as vandalism your linkage to [[Human brain]] in the [[Engram (neuropsychology)]] article, since the article says correctly that Lashley unsuccessfully looked for engrams in the rat brain, while another researcher studied the rabbit brain. Many human brain functions and defects are studied in animal models. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 20:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
18904 +++$+++ Edison +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18893 +++$+++ 18903 +++$+++ 2011-02-18 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.298092740E09 +++$+++ In cases where there is an image of a section of a human brain (or a rat brain, for that matter) and it is identified only as \"brain\" it would be fine to identify the species in the illustration, since the form and proportions differ greatly. In cases where animals have been used as models to study a drug or medical condition or principle of function, it should probably be left [[brain]].  +++$+++ :::In cases where there is an image of a section of a human brain (or a rat brain, for that matter) and it is identified only as "brain" it would be fine to identify the species in the illustration, since the form and proportions differ greatly. In cases where animals have been used as models to study a drug or medical condition or principle of function, it should probably be left [[brain]]. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 21:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

281038 +++$+++ Raymond Palmer +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-31 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.175402880E09 +++$+++ Albrecht, if there was ever a naval battle that was inconclusive it was this one. From a British point of view the battle was shambolic, Lestock was courts martialled for cowardice (he deliberately ignored Mathews signals but was acquited because of his friends in high places), but it was wholly indecisive. I can of course back this up with many sources but I thought I would consult you before making changes. What do you think?  +++$+++ Albrecht, if there was ever a naval battle that was inconclusive it was this one. From a British point of view the battle was shambolic, Lestock was courts martialled for cowardice (he deliberately ignored Mathews signals but was acquited because of his friends in high places), but it was wholly indecisive. I can of course back this up with many sources but I thought I would consult you before making changes. What do you think? [[User:Raymond Palmer|Raymond Palmer]] 21:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
281039 +++$+++ Raymond Palmer +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281038 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.175469060E09 +++$+++ Maybe later in the year we can rewrite it together. Cheers  +++$+++ ::Maybe later in the year we can rewrite it together. Cheers [[User:Raymond Palmer|Raymond Palmer]] 16:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

281040 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-05 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.175758260E09 +++$+++ Also, I reccomend that you fasten your seatbelt, because my experience tells me that, even though his point is usually correct, Maurice also knows how to use bolded caps (and he spells them right ;) so, if the situation is not fixed with a firm consensus soon, we are about to watch a terrible Clash of Bolded Caps as the last and procrastinated act of the Spanish War of Succession...you'll see ;)  +++$+++ Also, I reccomend that you fasten your seatbelt, because my experience tells me that, even though his point is usually correct, Maurice also knows how to use bolded caps (and he spells them right ;) so, if the situation is not fixed with a firm consensus soon, we are about to watch a terrible Clash of Bolded Caps as the last and procrastinated act of the Spanish War of Succession...you'll see ;) [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] | [[User talk:Mountolive|Talk]] 00:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
281041 +++$+++ Raymond Palmer +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281040 +++$+++ 281040 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.175967540E09 +++$+++ Albrecht, dare I hope that the Edit War of the Spanish Succesion is over : )  +++$+++ :Albrecht, dare I hope that the Edit War of the Spanish Succesion is over : ) [[User:Raymond Palmer|Raymond Palmer]] 10:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
281042 +++$+++ Raymond Palmer +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281040 +++$+++ 281040 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 10:42:00 +++$+++ 1.175967720E09 +++$+++ At least until you-know-who returns.  +++$+++ :At least until you-know-who returns. [[User:Raymond Palmer|Raymond Palmer]] 10:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
281043 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281040 +++$+++ 281042 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.176000780E09 +++$+++ besides, if we implement a playground for us Spaniards to play and fight, that maybe could be of help...  +++$+++ ::besides, if we implement a playground for us Spaniards to play and fight, that maybe could be of help... [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] | [[User talk:Mountolive|Talk]] 19:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

543185 +++$+++ Wandalstouring +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543185 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-31 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.170284760E09 +++$+++ So all the recent German governments used the term ''Mittelmacht'' (Poland for example is also called a ''Mittelmacht'' in German, but there is huge gap between the power of both countries)  +++$+++ So all the recent German governments used the term ''Mittelmacht'' (Poland for example is also called a ''Mittelmacht'' in German, but there is huge gap between the power of both countries) [[User:Wandalstouring|Wandalstouring]] 15:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
543186 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543185 +++$+++ 543185 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.170314640E09 +++$+++ There is no definite answer on the issue. Some may argue Germany to be a middle-power, others to be a great power. There is no \"official\" list of great powers. Both ideas have equal merit. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :There is no definite answer on the issue. Some may argue Germany to be a middle-power, others to be a great power. There is no "official" list of great powers. Both ideas have equal merit. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 23:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
543187 +++$+++ Wandalstouring +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543185 +++$+++ 543186 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.170315960E09 +++$+++ This is not about arguing someones position. The official position of the German government is: Germany is no great power, Germany is a middle power (I quoted even an official speech of the former head of state in the Ministry of Defence)  +++$+++ ::This is not about arguing someones position. The official position of the German government is: Germany is no great power, Germany is a middle power (I quoted even an official speech of the former head of state in the Ministry of Defence) [[User:Wandalstouring|Wandalstouring]] 23:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
543188 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543185 +++$+++ 543187 +++$+++ 2007-02-01 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.170341580E09 +++$+++ This is not official- it's a non-factual issue. If you quoted the \"speech of the former head of state\" than you couted his opinion, his argument. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :::This is not official- it's a non-factual issue. If you quoted the "speech of the former head of state" than you couted his opinion, his argument. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

281044 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-07 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.176000720E09 +++$+++ Hello Albrecht. What do you think of my suggestion on that talk page to start a Spain section in that article? I am willing to hear your comments either positive or negative, since I deem you as a very valuable editor there. I have asked Raymond as well.  +++$+++ Hello Albrecht. What do you think of my suggestion on that talk page to start a Spain section in that article? I am willing to hear your comments either positive or negative, since I deem you as a very valuable editor there. I have asked Raymond as well. [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] | [[User talk:Mountolive|Talk]] 19:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
281045 +++$+++ Mountolive +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281044 +++$+++ 281044 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.176001260E09 +++$+++ please place your comments in the relative talk page, so that there is some debate there. Thanks!  +++$+++ :please place your comments in the relative talk page, so that there is some debate there. Thanks! [[User:Mountolive|Mountolive]] | [[User talk:Mountolive|Talk]] 20:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

527438 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-07 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.165483800E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, Yaksha is not complying. :\/ Do you have a recommendation for a next step? -- +++$+++ Unfortunately, Yaksha is not complying. :/ Do you have a recommendation for a next step? --[[User:Elonka|Elonka]] 01:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
527439 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527438 +++$+++ 527438 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.165488300E09 +++$+++ In any case, I see that the mediation was rejected, which saddens me. :\/  If you do have any recommendations for how to further proceed at this point, I would be most grateful for any advice. -- +++$+++ : In any case, I see that the mediation was rejected, which saddens me. :/  If you do have any recommendations for how to further proceed at this point, I would be most grateful for any advice. --[[User:Elonka|Elonka]] 02:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
527440 +++$+++ Milo H Minderbinder +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527438 +++$+++ 527439 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.165527060E09 +++$+++ ''\"MedCom has confirmed that there is not currently consensus, and has issued a \"cease and desist\" on further moves\"''  Gee, that sure sounds like you said they've given a \"ruling\".  -- +++$+++ ::''"MedCom has confirmed that there is not currently consensus, and has issued a "cease and desist" on further moves"''  Gee, that sure sounds like you said they've given a "ruling".  --[[User:Milo H Minderbinder|Milo H Minderbinder]] 13:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

281046 +++$+++ Atropos +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-02 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.178098320E09 +++$+++ I see that you have made a number of edits to the ''[[Dos de Mayo Uprising]]'' article. Would you be interested in quickly citing some sources so that it could appear in the ''Did you know'' section, preferably some time on May second?  +++$+++ I see that you have made a number of edits to the ''[[Dos de Mayo Uprising]]'' article. Would you be interested in quickly citing some sources so that it could appear in the ''Did you know'' section, preferably some time on May second? [[User:Atropos|Atropos]] 02:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
281047 +++$+++ Physchim62 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281046 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-07 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.178556060E09 +++$+++ I suggest that you do a [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/User conduct|User RFC]]: in the meantime, he is blocked for 24 hours for removing a civility warning.  +++$+++ ::I suggest that you do a [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct|User RFC]]: in the meantime, he is blocked for 24 hours for removing a civility warning. [[User:Physchim62|Physchim62]] [[User talk:Physchim62|(talk)]] 09:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

543191 +++$+++ Nobleeagle +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543191 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-02 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.170427560E09 +++$+++ Emerging superpower articles are up for deletion. ''' <font color=\"#000080\">\u2014<\/font>  +++$+++ Emerging superpower articles are up for deletion. ''' <font color="#000080">—</font> [[User:Nobleeagle|<font color="#000080">N</font><font color="#12098A">o</font><font color="#120ABA">b</font><font color="#2015E3">l</font><font color="#1364EA">e</font><font color="#2BA4EC">e</font><font color="#1364EA">a</font><font color="#2015E3">g</font><font color="#120ABA">l</font><font color="#12098A">e</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Nobleeagle|<font color="#2015E3" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow"> <nowiki>[TALK]</nowiki></font>]][[Special:Contributions/Nobleeagle|<font color="#2015E3" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow">&nbsp;<nowiki>[C]</nowiki></font>]]</sup> 06:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
543192 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543191 +++$+++ 543191 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.170427620E09 +++$+++ Thank for notifying me. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Thank for notifying me. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

90532 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90532 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-03 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.215124980E09 +++$+++ These are some of my ideas about why things seem to be all from one viewpoint or another.--[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] |  +++$+++ These are some of my ideas about why things seem to be all from one viewpoint or another.--[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] | [[User:Filll/WP Challenge|<font color="Green"><small>wpc</small></font>]]) 15:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
90533 +++$+++ Gwen Gale +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90532 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-05 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.215324060E09 +++$+++ I've given this (along with your helpful comments) a lot of thought. Overall, I don't think Wikipedia's policies are being followed on controversial articles like this: If there is a strong consensus by PoV editors not to follow policy (which can be stirred up into a whirlwind of ugliness), this consensus will have sway over policy. I've seen this happen many times.  +++$+++ ::::I've given this (along with your helpful comments) a lot of thought. Overall, I don't think Wikipedia's policies are being followed on controversial articles like this: If there is a strong consensus by PoV editors not to follow policy (which can be stirred up into a whirlwind of ugliness), this consensus will have sway over policy. I've seen this happen many times. [[User:Gwen Gale|Gwen Gale]] ([[User talk:Gwen Gale|talk]]) 23:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

543196 +++$+++ Mitth'raw'nuruodo +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-04 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.170578820E09 +++$+++ How about if the \"you're simply a\" was replaced with \"a lot of Europeans to to go into....\" and \"Look at you people; you automatically take what R typed\"  was replaced by \"a lot of people automatically take what others type at face value because it goes along with their own anti-American views?\"  Would that work?  [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_States.svg|20px]] +++$+++ How about if the "you're simply a" was replaced with "a lot of Europeans to to go into...." and "Look at you people; you automatically take what R typed"  was replaced by "a lot of people automatically take what others type at face value because it goes along with their own anti-American views?"  Would that work?  [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_States.svg|20px]][[User:Mitth'raw'nuruodo|<font face=verdana><b><em><font color=blue>C<font color=red>h<font color=blue>i<font color=red>s<font color=blue>s <font color=red>B<font color=blue>o<font color=red>y</em></b></font></font></font></font>]] 00:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
543197 +++$+++ Mitth'raw'nuruodo +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543196 +++$+++ 543196 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.170742200E09 +++$+++ The first was changed, the second didn't need to be.  There's a response on the page.  [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_States.svg|20px]] +++$+++ :The first was changed, the second didn't need to be.  There's a response on the page.  [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_States.svg|20px]][[User:Mitth'raw'nuruodo|<font face=verdana><em><font color=blue>Chiss <font color=red>Boy</em></font></font></font></font>]] 22:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

18909 +++$+++ Kupirijo +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18909 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.300863660E09 +++$+++ Hello. I noticed you created a section of acetylated flavonols in [[:Template:Flavonol]]. Can you explain to me what does it mean since by looking at the structures I cannot see any acetylation. -- +++$+++ Hello. I noticed you created a section of acetylated flavonols in [[:Template:Flavonol]]. Can you explain to me what does it mean since by looking at the structures I cannot see any acetylation. --[[User:Kupirijo|kupirijo]] ([[User talk:Kupirijo|talk]]) 00:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
18910 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18909 +++$+++ 18909 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.300888620E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the remark. I changed the name into \"derivative flavonols\". Cheers. -- +++$+++ : Thank you for the remark. I changed the name into "derivative flavonols". Cheers. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 06:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

281054 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-14 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.179128220E09 +++$+++ Well, assuming that it is an alternative name in English-language historiography, you're correct; but, really, the two of you should just sit down and compare notes, rather than reverting back-and-forth without explicitly discussing the issue.  I suspect it's probably a misunderstanding of some sort.  +++$+++ Well, assuming that it is an alternative name in English-language historiography, you're correct; but, really, the two of you should just sit down and compare notes, rather than reverting back-and-forth without explicitly discussing the issue.  I suspect it's probably a misunderstanding of some sort. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 00:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
281055 +++$+++ Kirill Lokshin +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281054 +++$+++ 281054 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.179185580E09 +++$+++ Continued edit-warring is worse than having the article in a state you disagree with for a little while; it's not like he's blanking half the page or something.  Quite honestly, this dispute is over a relatively trivial matter; it should never have gotten this far.  +++$+++ :Continued edit-warring is worse than having the article in a state you disagree with for a little while; it's not like he's blanking half the page or something.  Quite honestly, this dispute is over a relatively trivial matter; it should never have gotten this far. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 16:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

483749 +++$+++ Komusou +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-05 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.194318120E09 +++$+++ &mdash;&nbsp; +++$+++ &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Komusou|Komusou]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Komusou|''talk'']]</sup> @ 19:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
483750 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483749 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-05 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.194324780E09 +++$+++ :For Hearst Papyrus, you would need to ask [[User:Lar]] (the admin who left a DYK notice for [[User:Cremepuff222]].  For Thiers Issard, that has already been rectified above at [[#Thiers Issard]].  \u2014 +++$+++ *:For Hearst Papyrus, you would need to ask [[User:Lar]] (the admin who left a DYK notice for [[User:Cremepuff222]].  For Thiers Issard, that has already been rectified above at [[#Thiers Issard]].  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 20:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

18912 +++$+++ Jokestress +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-24 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.301020020E09 +++$+++ Hello! Following the precedent you set in 2008 on the [[A1]] series of letter-number combinations [https:\/\/secure.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/w\/index.php?title=A1&oldid=255616257] I just added them to the letter-letter combinations. This is now [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#Navbox_in_dab_page|generating discussion]]. I [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#Navigation_box_and_creating_a_.22perfect_two-letter_page.22_template_per_MoS|explained my reasoning here]]. Would you care to weigh in? Thanks!  +++$+++ Hello! Following the precedent you set in 2008 on the [[A1]] series of letter-number combinations [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=A1&oldid=255616257] I just added them to the letter-letter combinations. This is now [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#Navbox_in_dab_page|generating discussion]]. I [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#Navigation_box_and_creating_a_.22perfect_two-letter_page.22_template_per_MoS|explained my reasoning here]]. Would you care to weigh in? Thanks! [[User:Jokestress|Jokestress]] ([[User talk:Jokestress|talk]]) 19:27, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
18913 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18912 +++$+++ 18912 +++$+++ 2011-03-24 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.301021820E09 +++$+++ Answer on Jokestress' user talk page -- +++$+++ : Answer on Jokestress' user talk page --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 19:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

18914 +++$+++ Macrakis +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-24 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.301031540E09 +++$+++ Hi, I see you were the one who set up [[:Category:Letter-number combination disambiguation pages]].  I was surprised to find listed in this category not only letter-number combinations, but also two-letter combinations like [[If]] and [[ZT]].  Of course, those could potentially be interpreted as numbers in base 36 or something (just as [[FF]] can denote 255 in hexadecimal), but, other than the hexademical numbers, these dab pages don't treat these as numbers.  After all, you could equally well treat, say, [[AAA]] as the hexadecimal representation of 2730, yet it is not in this category.  If the category is being used as you intended, I'd be interested in understanding the rationale.... If not, there's some cleanup to do.... -- +++$+++ Hi, I see you were the one who set up [[:Category:Letter-number combination disambiguation pages]].  I was surprised to find listed in this category not only letter-number combinations, but also two-letter combinations like [[If]] and [[ZT]].  Of course, those could potentially be interpreted as numbers in base 36 or something (just as [[FF]] can denote 255 in hexadecimal), but, other than the hexademical numbers, these dab pages don't treat these as numbers.  After all, you could equally well treat, say, [[AAA]] as the hexadecimal representation of 2730, yet it is not in this category.  If the category is being used as you intended, I'd be interested in understanding the rationale.... If not, there's some cleanup to do.... --[[User:Macrakis|Macrakis]] ([[User talk:Macrakis|talk]]) 22:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
18915 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18914 +++$+++ 18914 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.301069340E09 +++$+++ Please see conversation just above for explanation. Cheers!  +++$+++ : Please see conversation just above for explanation. Cheers! [[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 09:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

543204 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543204 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-17 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.171708380E09 +++$+++ I see from your contributions that you've been removing religion as a parameter in certain infoboxes. Consensus is required before altering infoboxes with high usage. Changes to them can effect hundreds or thousands of articles. Unilaterally removing certain parameters is unacceptable without first gaining consensus. I've reverted the changes you made to [[Template:Infobox Senator]] and [[Template:Infobox Congressman]] because of this. Thanks. -- +++$+++ I see from your contributions that you've been removing religion as a parameter in certain infoboxes. Consensus is required before altering infoboxes with high usage. Changes to them can effect hundreds or thousands of articles. Unilaterally removing certain parameters is unacceptable without first gaining consensus. I've reverted the changes you made to [[Template:Infobox Senator]] and [[Template:Infobox Congressman]] because of this. Thanks. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] 02:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
543205 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543204 +++$+++ 543204 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.171708680E09 +++$+++ Was there consensus before adding the religion parameter? If so, I sure can't find it. On both talk pages I see serious debate over whether or not religion ought to be mention. If anything there is no consensus to support the religion parameter-thus I removed it. It seems to me that the religion parameter got to being part of the infobox through \"unacceptable\" uni-lateral action as well. I will, however, wait for further discussion before doing so again. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Was there consensus before adding the religion parameter? If so, I sure can't find it. On both talk pages I see serious debate over whether or not religion ought to be mention. If anything there is no consensus to support the religion parameter-thus I removed it. It seems to me that the religion parameter got to being part of the infobox through "unacceptable" uni-lateral action as well. I will, however, wait for further discussion before doing so again. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 02:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
543206 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543204 +++$+++ 543205 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.171714140E09 +++$+++ As you probably noticed on your watchlist, I've begun a discussion on the Senator infobox to try to gain consensus one way or the other regarding the religion parameter. A dispute tag can be added to templates using <nowiki><noinclude><\/nowiki> tags, however I think that should wait to see where the discussion heads. Cheers. -- +++$+++ ::As you probably noticed on your watchlist, I've begun a discussion on the Senator infobox to try to gain consensus one way or the other regarding the religion parameter. A dispute tag can be added to templates using <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> tags, however I think that should wait to see where the discussion heads. Cheers. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] 04:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
543207 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543204 +++$+++ 543206 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.171717080E09 +++$+++ I see, I have added my argument to both talk pages and will wait with adding a dispute template. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :::I see, I have added my argument to both talk pages and will wait with adding a dispute template. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 04:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

18917 +++$+++ Dawynn +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18917 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-28 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.301341860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dawynn|Dawynn]] ([[User talk:Dawynn|talk]]) 12:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
18918 +++$+++ Grutness +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18917 +++$+++ 18917 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.301410800E09 +++$+++ Hi Nono64 - I take it you didn't read the part of [[WP:SFD]] which said ''\"DO NOT rename any stub type that has been nominated here while discussion is still in progress. Any necessary renaming will be done when the discussion is closed.\"''. All doing that does is make the job of tidying up any renaming or deletion much harder!  +++$+++ :Hi Nono64 - I take it you didn't read the part of [[WP:SFD]] which said ''"DO NOT rename any stub type that has been nominated here while discussion is still in progress. Any necessary renaming will be done when the discussion is closed."''. All doing that does is make the job of tidying up any renaming or deletion much harder! [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 08:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
18919 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18917 +++$+++ 18918 +++$+++ 2011-03-29 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.301414160E09 +++$+++ Sorry! I'll restore the template straight away. -- +++$+++ :: Sorry! I'll restore the template straight away. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 08:56, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

396369 +++$+++ David 5000 +++$+++ Dmn +++$+++ 396369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-12-11 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.102834260E09 +++$+++ Congratulations comrade, we have defeated the evil infidels, long live the list of songs with brackets in their titles!  Shame about the X Factor result (I've updated the page, not entirely sure what to do with it now it's all done).  Keep in touch.  +++$+++ Congratulations comrade, we have defeated the evil infidels, long live the list of songs with brackets in their titles!  Shame about the X Factor result (I've updated the page, not entirely sure what to do with it now it's all done).  Keep in touch. [[User:David 5000|David 5000]] 22:51, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
396370 +++$+++ David 5000 +++$+++ Dmn +++$+++ 396369 +++$+++ 396369 +++$+++ 2004-12-11 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.102836720E09 +++$+++ Sorry you're bored, do you have broadband at home?  I don't, probably just as well otherwise I'd be on here all day.  Steve's first single, released on December 20th (an odd date to choose, but a slow one in terms of releases), will be....Against All Odds.  Great, another crap version of that getting to number 1, hopefully Band Aid, Kylie, Ronan, or Hot Pantz (!) can stop it from getting there.   +++$+++ :Sorry you're bored, do you have broadband at home?  I don't, probably just as well otherwise I'd be on here all day.  Steve's first single, released on December 20th (an odd date to choose, but a slow one in terms of releases), will be....Against All Odds.  Great, another crap version of that getting to number 1, hopefully Band Aid, Kylie, Ronan, or Hot Pantz (!) can stop it from getting there.  [[User:David 5000|David 5000]] 23:32, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

281064 +++$+++ Carre +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281064 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-02 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.194017220E09 +++$+++ Why, thank you for your kind words!  I have noticed your comments on various Peninsular War articles, and was somewhat nervous of my recent work, worried that I would offend some nationalistic sensibilities;  your comment makes me inordinately pleased, strangely!   +++$+++ Why, thank you for your kind words!  I have noticed your comments on various Peninsular War articles, and was somewhat nervous of my recent work, worried that I would offend some nationalistic sensibilities;  your comment makes me inordinately pleased, strangely!  [[User:Carre|Carre]] 08:27, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
281065 +++$+++ Carre +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281064 +++$+++ 281064 +++$+++ 2007-11-06 09:28:00 +++$+++ 1.194370080E09 +++$+++ By the way, Gates and Esdaile actually make using Oman & Fortescue easier.  The latter two write so much detail, it would be difficult to select what needs to be included, but the single volume works identify the critical points, allowing me to pick and chose what I need from the longer accounts.  Seems to be working so far, anyway!   +++$+++ :By the way, Gates and Esdaile actually make using Oman & Fortescue easier.  The latter two write so much detail, it would be difficult to select what needs to be included, but the single volume works identify the critical points, allowing me to pick and chose what I need from the longer accounts.  Seems to be working so far, anyway!  [[User:Carre|Carre]] 09:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

46844 +++$+++ Feline Hymnic +++$+++ Ltwin +++$+++ 46844 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-01 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.283403600E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Feline Hymnic|Feline Hymnic]] ([[User talk:Feline Hymnic|talk]]) 22:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
46845 +++$+++ Ltwin +++$+++ Ltwin +++$+++ 46844 +++$+++ 46844 +++$+++ 2010-09-02 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.283413440E09 +++$+++ I'll try to look at over the next few days. I'm a little busy now with school in full swing so my time on WP may be inconsistent from now till December, but I'll definitely give it a look.  +++$+++ :I'll try to look at over the next few days. I'm a little busy now with school in full swing so my time on WP may be inconsistent from now till December, but I'll definitely give it a look. [[User:Ltwin|Ltwin]] ([[User talk:Ltwin#top|talk]]) 00:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

614823 +++$+++ GreedyCapitalist +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614823 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-14 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.150286160E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:GreedyCapitalist|GreedyCapitalist]] 04:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
614824 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614823 +++$+++ 614823 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.150286340E09 +++$+++ Ever heard the phrase ''two wrongs don't make a right''?  You did not only remove that user's comments, but as well another user warning you for making personal attacks - [[WP:VANDAL]]: ''users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion, except in cases of warnings, which they are generally prohibited from removing, especially where the intention of the removal is to mislead other editors.''  If another user attacked you report them on [[WP:PAIN]].  +++$+++ :Ever heard the phrase ''two wrongs don't make a right''?  You did not only remove that user's comments, but as well another user warning you for making personal attacks - [[WP:VANDAL]]: ''users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion, except in cases of warnings, which they are generally prohibited from removing, especially where the intention of the removal is to mislead other editors.''  If another user attacked you report them on [[WP:PAIN]]. [[User:Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]] 04:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
614825 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614823 +++$+++ 614823 +++$+++ 2006-06-14 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.150286880E09 +++$+++ And that excuses your personal attacks how?  +++$+++ :And that excuses your personal attacks how? [[User:Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]] 05:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

428353 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-06 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.244341080E09 +++$+++ After an FFD closed as keep and it was endorsed at DRV, deleting this was clearly out of process. Please restore it.  +++$+++ After an FFD closed as keep and it was endorsed at DRV, deleting this was clearly out of process. Please restore it. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 19:18, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
428354 +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 2009-06-06 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.244349540E09 +++$+++ No.  The discussion was about deleting it under [[WP:NFCC]] #2: respect for commercial use.  I speedy-deleted it under [[WP:CSD#F7|CSD F7]] and [[WP:IAR]] as a clearly replaceable fairuse image.  I probably should have tagged it and waited the 48 hours called for by the CSD criteria, but some of the people who close that category of CSD are of the opinion that only images of living people meet the criteria, and I wanted to make sure the image was deleted. -- +++$+++ :No.  The discussion was about deleting it under [[WP:NFCC]] #2: respect for commercial use.  I speedy-deleted it under [[WP:CSD#F7|CSD F7]] and [[WP:IAR]] as a clearly replaceable fairuse image.  I probably should have tagged it and waited the 48 hours called for by the CSD criteria, but some of the people who close that category of CSD are of the opinion that only images of living people meet the criteria, and I wanted to make sure the image was deleted. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo#top|talk]]) 21:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
428355 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 428354 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.244361780E09 +++$+++ Let me second the request and suggest you consider bringing it to WP:ANI for review if you insist on leaving it deleted.  +++$+++ ::Let me second the request and suggest you consider bringing it to WP:ANI for review if you insist on leaving it deleted. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 01:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
428356 +++$+++ 72.196.196.187 +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 428354 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.244370000E09 +++$+++ So you ignored one policy in order to enforce your interpretation of another?  [[Special:Contributions\/72.196.196.187|72.196.196.187]] ( +++$+++ ::So you ignored one policy in order to enforce your interpretation of another?  [[Special:Contributions/72.196.196.187|72.196.196.187]] ([[User talk:72.196.196.187|talk]]) 03:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
428357 +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 428356 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.244382060E09 +++$+++ The only policy I ignored was the 48-hour delay on speedy-deleting as CSD F7.  If you can convince me that there is no reasonable expectation of getting a free-licensed replacement for the image, I'll undelete it. -- +++$+++ :::The only policy I ignored was the 48-hour delay on speedy-deleting as CSD F7.  If you can convince me that there is no reasonable expectation of getting a free-licensed replacement for the image, I'll undelete it. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo#top|talk]]) 06:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
428358 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 428357 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.244403240E09 +++$+++ I've asked the closer of the DrV to review and figure out what to do here.  Given that it just make it through an XfD and DrV I don't think speeding it (and out of process at that) is either called for or wise.  Clearly a number of editors, including admins, felt there was no reasonable expectation of getting a free-licensed replacement and going off on your own in the face of that consensus, seems POINTY.  I'd ask that you either A) restore, B) bring to ANI, or C) restore and send to IfD.  +++$+++ ::::I've asked the closer of the DrV to review and figure out what to do here.  Given that it just make it through an XfD and DrV I don't think speeding it (and out of process at that) is either called for or wise.  Clearly a number of editors, including admins, felt there was no reasonable expectation of getting a free-licensed replacement and going off on your own in the face of that consensus, seems POINTY.  I'd ask that you either A) restore, B) bring to ANI, or C) restore and send to IfD. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 12:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
428359 +++$+++ 72.196.196.187 +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 428357 +++$+++ 2009-06-08 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.244454060E09 +++$+++ I don't have to make any justification to you.  Why?  Because basically what you've done is (a) deleted an image before any serious discussion could take place and (b) done so in a manner such that only people who had been aware of the previous discussions would even notice that the image was missing.  Then you put the burden of proof on people who want the image back.  How exactly do newcomers to the conversation meaningfully contribute if they can't even see the image in question? [[Special:Contributions\/72.196.196.187|72.196.196.187]] ( +++$+++ ::::I don't have to make any justification to you.  Why?  Because basically what you've done is (a) deleted an image before any serious discussion could take place and (b) done so in a manner such that only people who had been aware of the previous discussions would even notice that the image was missing.  Then you put the burden of proof on people who want the image back.  How exactly do newcomers to the conversation meaningfully contribute if they can't even see the image in question? [[Special:Contributions/72.196.196.187|72.196.196.187]] ([[User talk:72.196.196.187|talk]]) 02:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
428360 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.244404260E09 +++$+++ I'm re-DRVing.  +++$+++ :I'm re-DRVing. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 12:51, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
428361 +++$+++ Hobit +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 428360 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.244405400E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 13:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
428362 +++$+++ David Levy +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 2009-06-08 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.244502900E09 +++$+++ As I said, while I'm certain that you have Wikipedia's best interests at heart, no matter how this situation ends up (whether the image remains deleted or is restored), your decision to sidestep the standard process will have been far more detrimental to Wikipedia than it was helpful (as evidenced by the entirely foreseeable disruption that has resulted thus far).  Please consider this now and in the future.  Thank you.  \u2014 +++$+++ :As I said, while I'm certain that you have Wikipedia's best interests at heart, no matter how this situation ends up (whether the image remains deleted or is restored), your decision to sidestep the standard process will have been far more detrimental to Wikipedia than it was helpful (as evidenced by the entirely foreseeable disruption that has resulted thus far).  Please consider this now and in the future.  Thank you.  —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 16:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
428363 +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 428362 +++$+++ 2009-06-08 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.244528640E09 +++$+++ I deleted it right away because I ''know'' that some of the administrators who deal with that category use a simple alive=replaceable\/dead=irreplaceable criteria for evaluating things. -- +++$+++ ::I deleted it right away because I ''know'' that some of the administrators who deal with that category use a simple alive=replaceable/dead=irreplaceable criteria for evaluating things. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo#top|talk]]) 23:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
428364 +++$+++ David Levy +++$+++ Carnildo +++$+++ 428353 +++$+++ 428363 +++$+++ 2009-06-09 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.244531640E09 +++$+++ Have you sought to reword the policy to eliminate the perceived ambiguity?  For the record, I share your interpretation, but I don't condone dismissing other users' good-faith interpretations out of hand (let alone bypassing another policy to avoid giving them the opportunity to even express their dissenting viewpoints).  Can we please fix the process instead of sidestepping it?  It seems rather obvious that the latter is not helpful overall.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::Have you sought to reword the policy to eliminate the perceived ambiguity?  For the record, I share your interpretation, but I don't condone dismissing other users' good-faith interpretations out of hand (let alone bypassing another policy to avoid giving them the opportunity to even express their dissenting viewpoints).  Can we please fix the process instead of sidestepping it?  It seems rather obvious that the latter is not helpful overall.  —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 00:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

18928 +++$+++ Hamamelis +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-22 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.306085220E09 +++$+++ Hi Nono, I noticed you created the redir of ''[[Cephalostachyum viguieri]]'' to ''[[Cathariostachys madagascariensis]]'', and I see the latter shows it as a synon., but have found no evidence that it really is a synon. Do you know where a ref for it can be found? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Nono, I noticed you created the redir of ''[[Cephalostachyum viguieri]]'' to ''[[Cathariostachys madagascariensis]]'', and I see the latter shows it as a synon., but have found no evidence that it really is a synon. Do you know where a ref for it can be found? Thanks, [[User:Hamamelis|Hamamelis]] ([[User talk:Hamamelis|talk]]) 10:27, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
18929 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18928 +++$+++ 18928 +++$+++ 2011-05-22 10:42:00 +++$+++ 1.306086120E09 +++$+++ Hi Hamamelis, Actually, if it is a synonym, the references given don't state it. So I can't remember why I created this redirect. The best thing to do in this situation is to ask an administrator to delete it. Do you need that I ask for it or do you want to create an article of your own? best regards! -- +++$+++ : Hi Hamamelis, Actually, if it is a synonym, the references given don't state it. So I can't remember why I created this redirect. The best thing to do in this situation is to ask an administrator to delete it. Do you need that I ask for it or do you want to create an article of your own? best regards! --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 10:42, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
18930 +++$+++ Hamamelis +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18928 +++$+++ 18929 +++$+++ 2011-05-22 10:58:00 +++$+++ 1.306087080E09 +++$+++ I'll see if I can find enough for a minimal article, at least. If not we can ask for it to be deleted. Thanks!  +++$+++ ::I'll see if I can find enough for a minimal article, at least. If not we can ask for it to be deleted. Thanks! [[User:Hamamelis|Hamamelis]] ([[User talk:Hamamelis|talk]]) 10:58, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
18931 +++$+++ Hamamelis +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18928 +++$+++ 18930 +++$+++ 2011-05-22 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.306090140E09 +++$+++ Done!  +++$+++ :::Done! [[User:Hamamelis|Hamamelis]] ([[User talk:Hamamelis|talk]]) 11:49, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
18932 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18928 +++$+++ 18931 +++$+++ 2011-05-22 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.306090200E09 +++$+++ Great! -- +++$+++ :::: Great! --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 11:50, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

543217 +++$+++  +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I apologize if you don't want to be bothered by a petty problem...Thank You for your time. Cali567 05:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ I apologize if you don't want to be bothered by a petty problem...Thank You for your time. Cali567 05:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
543218 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543217 +++$+++ 543217 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.173966360E09 +++$+++ I'll look into to it tomorrow. Sorry for the delay but I'm currently quite busy in non-virtual life. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I'll look into to it tomorrow. Sorry for the delay but I'm currently quite busy in non-virtual life. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
543219 +++$+++ Cali567 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543217 +++$+++ 543218 +++$+++ 2007-03-16 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.174042980E09 +++$+++ Thank you for trying to help smooth things out...I don't understand why he treats the word 'ethnic' so liberally?when people speak of ethnic groups it's usually a blood related thing? right? It's commonly used as a 'racial' or 'related' thing (actually related, not the meaning he thinks it means). I think one of the problems is that word...people have a thought connected to it -yet that's not the exact dictionary meaning (he tries to point out). I think he found a loop-hole becuase that state of mind isn't the one people use when thinking \"ethnically related\". It's very confusing because Chris Sundita argues Filipinos have many Hispanic attributes and they are \"truly\" a part of Hispanidad (?), yet he firmly denies they are Hispanic??? I may be naive, but things are not always that gray...I'm sorry to rant, but I'm really confused. Again, I appreciate your help when you have other things to do -We all have a life, and it's so easy to get lost on-line!...  +++$+++ ::Thank you for trying to help smooth things out...I don't understand why he treats the word 'ethnic' so liberally?when people speak of ethnic groups it's usually a blood related thing? right? It's commonly used as a 'racial' or 'related' thing (actually related, not the meaning he thinks it means). I think one of the problems is that word...people have a thought connected to it -yet that's not the exact dictionary meaning (he tries to point out). I think he found a loop-hole becuase that state of mind isn't the one people use when thinking "ethnically related". It's very confusing because Chris Sundita argues Filipinos have many Hispanic attributes and they are "truly" a part of Hispanidad (?), yet he firmly denies they are Hispanic??? I may be naive, but things are not always that gray...I'm sorry to rant, but I'm really confused. Again, I appreciate your help when you have other things to do -We all have a life, and it's so easy to get lost on-line!... [[User:Cali567|Cali567]] 04:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

368489 +++$+++ Brambleclawx +++$+++ Pepper +++$+++ 368489 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-18 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.292712960E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Thanks for changing the picture for the Warriors Userbox! I think most people will like it better than the \"W\"! ''<span style=\"background:#00BB00\"> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for changing the picture for the Warriors Userbox! I think most people will like it better than the "W"! ''<span style="background:#00BB00">[[User:Brambleclawx|<span style="color:brown">Bramble</span>]][[User talk:Brambleclawx|<span style="color:brown">claw</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Brambleclawx|<span style="color:brown">x</span>]]</span>'' 14:56, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
368490 +++$+++ Pepper +++$+++ Pepper +++$+++ 368489 +++$+++ 368489 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.292713320E09 +++$+++ Thanks! '''<span style=\"font-family:Garamond;font-size:100%;\">:.:\u2219:\u2219\u2219:\u2219:.:&#124; +++$+++ :Thanks! '''<span style="font-family:Garamond;font-size:100%;">:.:∙:∙∙:∙:.:&#124;[[User:Pepper|<span style="color:black">pepper</span>]]&#124;[[User talk:Pepper|<span style="color:black">:.:∙:∙∙:∙:.:</span>]]</span>''' 15:02, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

543220 +++$+++ Corticopia +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-13 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.173850260E09 +++$+++ Thank you for weighing in on this prior AfD.  Even though an apparent consensus supported the prior AfD in some way, and the article has been deleted, [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review\/Log\/2007_March_9#North_America_.28Americas.29|this has reared its head again]] -- please peruse and weigh in.  Thanks!  +++$+++ Thank you for weighing in on this prior AfD.  Even though an apparent consensus supported the prior AfD in some way, and the article has been deleted, [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_March_9#North_America_.28Americas.29|this has reared its head again]] -- please peruse and weigh in.  Thanks! [[User:Corticopia|Corticopia]] 22:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
543221 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543220 +++$+++ 543220 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.173966360E09 +++$+++ Whill look at it soon. Thanks. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Whill look at it soon. Thanks. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

18933 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18933 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-23 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.306181820E09 +++$+++ Just in case you haven't noticed, there are some questions at [[Talk:Vitisin A (pyranoanthocyanin)]] re: the molecular diagram that you uploaded.  +++$+++ Just in case you haven't noticed, there are some questions at [[Talk:Vitisin A (pyranoanthocyanin)]] re: the molecular diagram that you uploaded. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 13:17, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
18934 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18933 +++$+++ 18933 +++$+++ 2011-05-23 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.306209300E09 +++$+++ Thank you. -- +++$+++ : Thank you. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 20:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

18935 +++$+++ DrMicro +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-31 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.306885440E09 +++$+++ Re name change: There is a bit more to this page than just a list of Plasmodium species. For this reason I think the original name for the page would be better. Or perhaps a third alternative?  +++$+++ Re name change: There is a bit more to this page than just a list of Plasmodium species. For this reason I think the original name for the page would be better. Or perhaps a third alternative? [[User:DrMicro|DrMicro]] ([[User talk:DrMicro|talk]]) 16:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
18936 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18935 +++$+++ 18935 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.306893660E09 +++$+++ Hi, I checked the history. I am apparently not in the list of contributors to this article. So I don't understand the motive of this discussion. Can you be a a bit more specific? Cheers, -- +++$+++ : Hi, I checked the history. I am apparently not in the list of contributors to this article. So I don't understand the motive of this discussion. Can you be a a bit more specific? Cheers, --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 19:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

543224 +++$+++  +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543224 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Sorry, but those rainbow images you used on the Lincoln pages are brutal. Just stick to a street picture like 99.9% of all the car photos on wikipedia. No need to take it up a notch, cause it doesn't look very encylcopeadic. 06:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ Sorry, but those rainbow images you used on the Lincoln pages are brutal. Just stick to a street picture like 99.9% of all the car photos on wikipedia. No need to take it up a notch, cause it doesn't look very encylcopeadic. 06:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
543225 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543224 +++$+++ 543224 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.176040200E09 +++$+++ That is why I will replace these images w\/ white backgrounds. Whether or not the multi-color backgrounds are \"burtal\" is your opinion-and that's fine. I maintain that they are far better than street pictures-which are the worst possible choice. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :That is why I will replace these images w/ white backgrounds. Whether or not the multi-color backgrounds are "burtal" is your opinion-and that's fine. I maintain that they are far better than street pictures-which are the worst possible choice. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

543226 +++$+++ CJ DUB +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-08 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.176084780E09 +++$+++ You're joking right? In case you didn't notice, cars belong on the street or in the parking lot, just like in auto periodicals. Your cut-out background white or otherwise does not cut it for a '''encyclopedic article'''. This is not some display of art, put a picture that does the job, not one that looks like party going on. Sorry, but your ideas for spicing up the pictures are not conventional, with regards to wikepdeia convention, that is. That's not opinion, its FACT.  +++$+++ You're joking right? In case you didn't notice, cars belong on the street or in the parking lot, just like in auto periodicals. Your cut-out background white or otherwise does not cut it for a '''encyclopedic article'''. This is not some display of art, put a picture that does the job, not one that looks like party going on. Sorry, but your ideas for spicing up the pictures are not conventional, with regards to wikepdeia convention, that is. That's not opinion, its FACT. [[User:CJ DUB|CJ DUB]] 19:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
543227 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543226 +++$+++ 543226 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.176086280E09 +++$+++ I suggest you look up the word fact. This is your opinion and that's fine-but I disagree and completely detest these amateurish on-the-street pics. A compromise I have found with other users-is that I will simply display the cars on white background. Articles need to look professional and a on-the-street shot does not \"do the job.\" As for convention, this is Wikipedia, but there is no convention-our number one rule is to be bold & innovative. We are pragmatics here ;-)!. To be frank with you-I have 13k+ edits and am the sole author of several GAs, so please don't lecture me on what constitutes a good article. FYI: look in auto brochures-you will not see a car on a supermarket parking lot (even if it's the brochure of a really crappy car)-simple dark and white background, however, you will find. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I suggest you look up the word fact. This is your opinion and that's fine-but I disagree and completely detest these amateurish on-the-street pics. A compromise I have found with other users-is that I will simply display the cars on white background. Articles need to look professional and a on-the-street shot does not "do the job." As for convention, this is Wikipedia, but there is no convention-our number one rule is to be bold & innovative. We are pragmatics here ;-)!. To be frank with you-I have 13k+ edits and am the sole author of several GAs, so please don't lecture me on what constitutes a good article. FYI: look in auto brochures-you will not see a car on a supermarket parking lot (even if it's the brochure of a really crappy car)-simple dark and white background, however, you will find. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 19:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

18940 +++$+++ Invertzoo +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18940 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-15 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.308203640E09 +++$+++ Hello again Nono64. Apparently you have not read this page[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Disambiguation_dos_and_don%27ts] of Disambiguation does and don'ts. I have seen you do this before so maybe you don't yet know that it is against Wikipedia policy to list red links in a disambiguation page. And without the red link, this particular disambig page is not needed at all at least as yet. When someone finally gets around to writing [[Clypeola (gastropod)]], which could take years, simple hat notes on both articles would be sufficient anyway.  +++$+++ Hello again Nono64. Apparently you have not read this page[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Disambiguation_dos_and_don%27ts] of Disambiguation does and don'ts. I have seen you do this before so maybe you don't yet know that it is against Wikipedia policy to list red links in a disambiguation page. And without the red link, this particular disambig page is not needed at all at least as yet. When someone finally gets around to writing [[Clypeola (gastropod)]], which could take years, simple hat notes on both articles would be sufficient anyway. [[User:Invertzoo|Invertzoo]] ([[User talk:Invertzoo|talk]]) 22:54, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
18941 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18940 +++$+++ 18940 +++$+++ 2011-06-16 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.308280500E09 +++$+++ Hi Invertzoo! I created the stub article. That would be nice however to check thoroughly if there is not a synonymy issue here regarding ''[[Zegalerus]]''. I'm sorry that I didn't find much by myself on the subject. Cheers! -- +++$+++ : Hi Invertzoo! I created the stub article. That would be nice however to check thoroughly if there is not a synonymy issue here regarding ''[[Zegalerus]]''. I'm sorry that I didn't find much by myself on the subject. Cheers! --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 20:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
18942 +++$+++ Invertzoo +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18940 +++$+++ 18941 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.308433560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for starting the ''Clypeola'' article; I fixed it up a little. Still, as a rule, if there are only two pages that need differentiating, hat notes are sufficient to do that, without creating a disambiguation page. Watch out for red links in your other disambig pages and eliminate them as necessary.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for starting the ''Clypeola'' article; I fixed it up a little. Still, as a rule, if there are only two pages that need differentiating, hat notes are sufficient to do that, without creating a disambiguation page. Watch out for red links in your other disambig pages and eliminate them as necessary. [[User:Invertzoo|Invertzoo]] ([[User talk:Invertzoo|talk]]) 14:46, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

281085 +++$+++ Tpbradbury +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281085 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-10 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.236715020E09 +++$+++ Hi, you've added, \"Drawing on research by Jacques Bainville, however, a number of scholars have cast doubt on the sincerity of these offers, as the aim of the powers concerned was Napoleon's destruction, and have concluded he shrewdly refused his enemies' traps.\" I notice from the link you've put to Bainville's article that, he seems to have been Germanophobic and that the research would probably have been done around the 1920s. have you got any more recent reliable English sources for the claim i.e. who are the scholars? thanks,  +++$+++ Hi, you've added, "Drawing on research by Jacques Bainville, however, a number of scholars have cast doubt on the sincerity of these offers, as the aim of the powers concerned was Napoleon's destruction, and have concluded he shrewdly refused his enemies' traps." I notice from the link you've put to Bainville's article that, he seems to have been Germanophobic and that the research would probably have been done around the 1920s. have you got any more recent reliable English sources for the claim i.e. who are the scholars? thanks, [[User:Tpbradbury|Tom B]] ([[User talk:Tpbradbury|talk]]) 12:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
281086 +++$+++  +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281085 +++$+++ 281085 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.236730320E09 +++$+++ thanks. on the 'many' point, I agree that many do admire his accomplishments, though using many and some appears to be generally frowned on as vague terms. people could accurately use the term many in relation to Stalin and Hitler. 'there are those' does sound guarded, it maybe better to simply remove it. Tom B (talk) 17:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ :thanks. on the 'many' point, I agree that many do admire his accomplishments, though using many and some appears to be generally frowned on as vague terms. people could accurately use the term many in relation to Stalin and Hitler. 'there are those' does sound guarded, it maybe better to simply remove it. Tom B (talk) 17:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

524373 +++$+++ Kwork +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524373 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.189804920E09 +++$+++ AnonEMouse, I have noticed today that there are many recent comments on the [[Alice Bailey]] talk page that do not show in \"history\". How can that happen?  +++$+++ AnonEMouse, I have noticed today that there are many recent comments on the [[Alice Bailey]] talk page that do not show in "history". How can that happen? [[User:Kwork|Kwork]] 14:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524374 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524373 +++$+++ 524373 +++$+++ 2007-09-14 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.189806420E09 +++$+++ It can't, without [[Wikipedia:Oversight]] or some intensive work deleting specific revisions by an admin. Or at least I've never seen it happen, and I've been looking at page histories a long time. What specific comments are you referring to, please? -- +++$+++ : It can't, without [[Wikipedia:Oversight]] or some intensive work deleting specific revisions by an admin. Or at least I've never seen it happen, and I've been looking at page histories a long time. What specific comments are you referring to, please? --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:47, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

265301 +++$+++ Nickhk +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-05 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.149575220E09 +++$+++ Re first para - I only got there on about my fourth go (have a look at the history)! Overall I found copy editing this article like wading through treacle, so I have been impressed by your ability to plow through the entire article so quickly over the past couple days  +++$+++ Re first para - I only got there on about my fourth go (have a look at the history)! Overall I found copy editing this article like wading through treacle, so I have been impressed by your ability to plow through the entire article so quickly over the past couple days [[User:Nickhk|Nickhk]] 23:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
265302 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265301 +++$+++ 265301 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.149538380E09 +++$+++ I guess the only thing you could do is write your new articles in an external text editor and when your new article has reached a certain state of \"completeness\" you might want to consider to upload it and \"open it up\" for other people to contribute to. On Wikipedia it pretty hard to mask the fact that you're writing an article or new content. Masking an article about Frank Pais as \"Portuguese Colonial Revolution\" will most likely result in a renaming and merger of your article and the original Frank Pais article, I'm afraid. <strong> +++$+++ :I guess the only thing you could do is write your new articles in an external text editor and when your new article has reached a certain state of "completeness" you might want to consider to upload it and "open it up" for other people to contribute to. On Wikipedia it pretty hard to mask the fact that you're writing an article or new content. Masking an article about Frank Pais as "Portuguese Colonial Revolution" will most likely result in a renaming and merger of your article and the original Frank Pais article, I'm afraid. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 13:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
265303 +++$+++ RasputinAXP +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265301 +++$+++ 265302 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.149541920E09 +++$+++ You could also write the article in your userspace by linking to it before it exists, like this:  +++$+++ ::You could also write the article in your userspace by linking to it before it exists, like this: [[User:KarenAnn/Frank Pais]]. I did that for several articles I needed more time to put together. [[User talk:RasputinAXP|<font color="#FFFFFF" style="background: maroon;">&nbsp;RasputinAXP&nbsp;</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/RasputinAXP|<small>c</small>]] 14:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
265304 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265301 +++$+++ 265301 +++$+++ 2006-06-05 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.149542280E09 +++$+++ I would just copy the footnote syntax from the relevant pages on Wikipedia. There are code editors with \"snippet\" functionality and even Wiki markup support. Maybe you could configure some footnote snippets. Also, the avaible external Wikipedia editors might have the functionality to automatically insert footnotes, but I'm not sure about that. Have a look at this [[Wikipedia:Tools|page]]. <strong> +++$+++ :I would just copy the footnote syntax from the relevant pages on Wikipedia. There are code editors with "snippet" functionality and even Wiki markup support. Maybe you could configure some footnote snippets. Also, the avaible external Wikipedia editors might have the functionality to automatically insert footnotes, but I'm not sure about that. Have a look at this [[Wikipedia:Tools|page]]. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 14:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
265305 +++$+++ Maester_mensch +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265301 +++$+++ 265301 +++$+++ 2006-06-06 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.149655380E09 +++$+++ There surely must be some spell checker extensions available on the Mozilla website, as there are extensions for virtually anything. <strong> +++$+++ :There surely must be some spell checker extensions available on the Mozilla website, as there are extensions for virtually anything. <strong>[[User:Maester_mensch|mensch]]</strong> • <strong><small>[[User_talk:Maester_mensch|t]]</small></strong> 21:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

543233 +++$+++ Padishah5000 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-25 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.177568820E09 +++$+++ Hello! The map in the article white Americans in not inline with U.S racial classifications. That is why it was removed. If you wish to modify the map, or use a different one, please do so. The current map is inaccurate and not acceptable. Thank you.  +++$+++ Hello! The map in the article white Americans in not inline with U.S racial classifications. That is why it was removed. If you wish to modify the map, or use a different one, please do so. The current map is inaccurate and not acceptable. Thank you. [[User:Padishah5000|Padishah5000]] 23:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
543234 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543233 +++$+++ 543233 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.177569060E09 +++$+++ How is it \"not inline with U.S racial classifications?\" It is based on US Census Bureau data! Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :How is it "not inline with U.S racial classifications?" It is based on US Census Bureau data! Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 23:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
543235 +++$+++ Padishah5000 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543233 +++$+++ 543234 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.177569420E09 +++$+++ It may partically be based on U.S census data, but to be accurate you would need to include a few more countries, for instance, such as Iran, etc. As crazy as it sounds, that is how the U.S Census, Labor Department and Department of Education, all based on congressional legislation, interprete \"white origin\" in America.  +++$+++ ::It may partically be based on U.S census data, but to be accurate you would need to include a few more countries, for instance, such as Iran, etc. As crazy as it sounds, that is how the U.S Census, Labor Department and Department of Education, all based on congressional legislation, interprete "white origin" in America. [[User:Padishah5000|Padishah5000]] 23:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
543236 +++$+++ Padishah5000 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543233 +++$+++ 543235 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.177569420E09 +++$+++ Maybe if you include a \"footer\" of some sort in the box, stating that the map in only partially accurate?  +++$+++ :::Maybe if you include a "footer" of some sort in the box, stating that the map in only partially accurate? [[User:Padishah5000|Padishah5000]] 23:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

18946 +++$+++ TomorrowsDream +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18946 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.310667900E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm not clear why this article has moved.  Will the same be done to [British Airways], [Pfizer] or [Sanofi] for example?  it would seem to me that people know these companies by the primary name not their incorporation status but then I'm not familiar with Wiki policies.  Thanks  +++$+++ Hi, I'm not clear why this article has moved.  Will the same be done to [British Airways], [Pfizer] or [Sanofi] for example?  it would seem to me that people know these companies by the primary name not their incorporation status but then I'm not familiar with Wiki policies.  Thanks [[User:TomorrowsDream|TomorrowsDream]] ([[User talk:TomorrowsDream|talk]]) 11:25, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
18947 +++$+++ DMacks +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18946 +++$+++ 18946 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.310673060E09 +++$+++ Looks pretty contrary to [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies)]] standard guideline (not normally added unless disambiguating on it, and definitely the commonname for this term so it gets non-DAB title).  +++$+++ :Looks pretty contrary to [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies)]] standard guideline (not normally added unless disambiguating on it, and definitely the commonname for this term so it gets non-DAB title). [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 12:51, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

281091 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-25 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.243310820E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Ataque brit\xe1nico en Santa Cruz de Tenerife.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Ataque brit\xe1nico en Santa Cruz de Tenerife.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Ataque brit\xe1nico en Santa Cruz de Tenerife.jpg]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:File:Ataque británico en Santa Cruz de Tenerife.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Ataque británico en Santa Cruz de Tenerife.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Ataque británico en Santa Cruz de Tenerife.jpg]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 21:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
281092 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281091 +++$+++ 281091 +++$+++ 2009-06-03 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.244067720E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Montgomery's Tavern.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Montgomery&#39;s Tavern.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Montgomery's Tavern.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Montgomery&#39;s Tavern.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 15:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

543237 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-07 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.178570520E09 +++$+++ Hi Brendel.  Ever thought of [[WP:RFA|standing for adminship]]?  If you're interested, I would be happy to nominate you.  Please let me know. '''\xb7 <font color=\"#70A070\"> +++$+++ Hi Brendel.  Ever thought of [[WP:RFA|standing for adminship]]?  If you're interested, I would be happy to nominate you.  Please let me know. '''· <font color="#70A070">[[User:Jersyko|jersyko]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' 13:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
543238 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543237 +++$+++ 543237 +++$+++ 2007-05-10 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.178862600E09 +++$+++ Great.  I'll start working on it soon.  Is there anything in your history here that might become an issue in an RFA?  I'm not talking about editing disputes with trolls, but rather issues with established users, sysops, or the like.  If you would rather, feel free to e-mail me.  In fact, I recommend that you enable e-mail, as well, before beginning the RFA process.  Otherwise, I will notify you once I finish your nominating statement. '''\xb7 <font color=\"#70A070\"> +++$+++ :Great.  I'll start working on it soon.  Is there anything in your history here that might become an issue in an RFA?  I'm not talking about editing disputes with trolls, but rather issues with established users, sysops, or the like.  If you would rather, feel free to e-mail me.  In fact, I recommend that you enable e-mail, as well, before beginning the RFA process.  Otherwise, I will notify you once I finish your nominating statement. '''· <font color="#70A070">[[User:Jersyko|jersyko]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' 22:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

543239 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543239 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-11 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.178869920E09 +++$+++ Don't forget to enable e-mail and change your RFA's end time once you accept and finish typing the answers to the 3 questions.  If you have any questions, please let me know.  Good luck. '''\xb7 <font color=\"#70A070\"> +++$+++ Don't forget to enable e-mail and change your RFA's end time once you accept and finish typing the answers to the 3 questions.  If you have any questions, please let me know.  Good luck. '''· <font color="#70A070">[[User:Jersyko|jersyko]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' 00:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
543240 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543239 +++$+++ 543239 +++$+++ 2007-05-11 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.178912640E09 +++$+++ Excellent work.  Once you are satisfied with your answer revisions, either follow the instructions [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/nominate#What to do if you are nominated by someone else:|here]] to open it up to a community vote (making sure to change the \"close\" date and time, of course), or just ask me and I'll take care of it. '''\xb7 <font color=\"#70A070\"> +++$+++ :Excellent work.  Once you are satisfied with your answer revisions, either follow the instructions [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate#What to do if you are nominated by someone else:|here]] to open it up to a community vote (making sure to change the "close" date and time, of course), or just ask me and I'll take care of it. '''· <font color="#70A070">[[User:Jersyko|jersyko]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' 12:44, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

18952 +++$+++ Ferritecore +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-25 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311662340E09 +++$+++ What is the point of this new category? Tanning is just one, fairly narrow, aspect of leathermaking. I think it would be best to not create such a narrow category and fold tanning back into leathermaking where it belongs.  +++$+++ What is the point of this new category? Tanning is just one, fairly narrow, aspect of leathermaking. I think it would be best to not create such a narrow category and fold tanning back into leathermaking where it belongs. [[User:Ferritecore|Ferritecore]] ([[User talk:Ferritecore|talk]]) 23:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
18953 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ Nono64 +++$+++ 18952 +++$+++ 18952 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.311710880E09 +++$+++ Thanks! For the milling machine, I just moved it to the \"milling\" disambiguation page. -- +++$+++ : Thanks! For the milling machine, I just moved it to the "milling" disambiguation page. --[[User:Nono64|Nono64]] ([[User talk:Nono64#top|talk]]) 13:08, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

18954 +++$+++ Sir Paul +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18954 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.152278640E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your comments on [[Oliver Kamm]]'s talk page.  Although I have other pressing tasks to attend at the moment, I'll eventually return to the discussion.  Also, don't let TJive intimidate you.  He's nothing but a bully.  +++$+++ I appreciate your comments on [[Oliver Kamm]]'s talk page.  Although I have other pressing tasks to attend at the moment, I'll eventually return to the discussion.  Also, don't let TJive intimidate you.  He's nothing but a bully. [[User:Sir Paul|Sir Paul]] 06:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
18955 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18954 +++$+++ 18954 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.152310020E09 +++$+++ It's ironic, though. I have long regarded Kamm as a pretentious fool who isn't worth a minute of anybody's time trying to read him -- which is why I've been reluctant to get drawn in. Yet I'm still wasting time on him...-- +++$+++ :It's ironic, though. I have long regarded Kamm as a pretentious fool who isn't worth a minute of anybody's time trying to read him -- which is why I've been reluctant to get drawn in. Yet I'm still wasting time on him...--[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] 15:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
18956 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18954 +++$+++ 18954 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.290911760E09 +++$+++ [[BBC Radio 4]] [http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/iplayer\/console\/b00vkpk4\/Start_the_Week_01_11_2010 ''Start the Week'' 1\/11\/2010] - Interview with [[Deborah Cadbury]] on her latest book: [http:\/\/thisisi2i.wordpress.com\/2010\/11\/07\/quackers-chocolates-and-csr\/ sound business principles], not exactly in line with the [[Milton Friedman]] school of economics. -- +++$+++ * [[BBC Radio 4]] [http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00vkpk4/Start_the_Week_01_11_2010 ''Start the Week'' 1/11/2010] - Interview with [[Deborah Cadbury]] on her latest book: [http://thisisi2i.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/quackers-chocolates-and-csr/ sound business principles], not exactly in line with the [[Milton Friedman]] school of economics. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 18:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
18957 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18954 +++$+++ 18954 +++$+++ 2011-03-19 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.300559820E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.counterpunch.org\/amin03182011.html Taking Stock of the Arab Revolutions], Esam al-Amin, 18 March 2011. Excellent summary of the progress so far. -- +++$+++ * [http://www.counterpunch.org/amin03182011.html Taking Stock of the Arab Revolutions], Esam al-Amin, 18 March 2011. Excellent summary of the progress so far. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 11:37, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

18958 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-12 07:01:00 +++$+++ 1.302616860E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 07:01, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
18959 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18958 +++$+++ 18958 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.305469440E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/programmes\/b010y0t3 BBC Radio 4, ''Four Thought'', 05:45 a.m. (BST) Sunday 15\/5\/2011] Talk, recorded live, at the [[Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures & Commerce|RSA]]. Heard this this morning on the radio, well worth listening to again\u2014on the deadliest war since Hitler. Best not listened to while you're eating your breakfast. -- +++$+++ * [http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b010y0t3 BBC Radio 4, ''Four Thought'', 05:45 a.m. (BST) Sunday 15/5/2011] Talk, recorded live, at the [[Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures & Commerce|RSA]]. Heard this this morning on the radio, well worth listening to again—on the deadliest war since Hitler. Best not listened to while you're eating your breakfast. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 07:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

18960 +++$+++ Mandarax +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-18 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.298101560E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 23:46, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
18961 +++$+++ P.T. Aufrette +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18960 +++$+++ 18960 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.298105760E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on the work you did to much improve the article.  PS, It's interesting that the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (cited in the article) gets a small detail wrong (\"a son and two daughters\"). --  +++$+++ : Congratulations on the work you did to much improve the article.  PS, It's interesting that the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (cited in the article) gets a small detail wrong ("a son and two daughters"). -- [[User:P.T. Aufrette|P.T. Aufrette]] ([[User talk:P.T. Aufrette|talk]]) 00:56, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
18962 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18960 +++$+++ 18961 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.298129280E09 +++$+++ Thanks, but I wouldn't have been able to do it without your initial work, and I'm sure I wouldn't have found some of those sources you're using. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks, but I wouldn't have been able to do it without your initial work, and I'm sure I wouldn't have found some of those sources you're using. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 07:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
18963 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18960 +++$+++ 18961 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.298130540E09 +++$+++ P.S. Looking at the page hit stats, I see our article got 1.2k hits\u2014but the other links in the \"hook\" all got more: [[Wrangler (University of Cambridge)|Wrangler]] 1.4k, [[Devilling#Treasury Devil|Devil]] 2.5k, [[bryology|bryologist]] 2.1k. -- +++$+++ ::P.S. Looking at the page hit stats, I see our article got 1.2k hits—but the other links in the "hook" all got more: [[Wrangler (University of Cambridge)|Wrangler]] 1.4k, [[Devilling#Treasury Devil|Devil]] 2.5k, [[bryology|bryologist]] 2.1k. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 07:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
18964 +++$+++ P.T. Aufrette +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18960 +++$+++ 18963 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.298137200E09 +++$+++ Yes, it was gratifying to find the bryology stuff.  I mostly just did a cluster of qualified searches (eg, \"James Stirling Finchcocks\") because the name is just too common, and nowadays with more and more printed matter being scanned in and Googleable (albeit often in garbled OCR text), some interesting hits do turn up if you dig down deep enough in the search result listings.  --  +++$+++ :::Yes, it was gratifying to find the bryology stuff.  I mostly just did a cluster of qualified searches (eg, "James Stirling Finchcocks") because the name is just too common, and nowadays with more and more printed matter being scanned in and Googleable (albeit often in garbled OCR text), some interesting hits do turn up if you dig down deep enough in the search result listings.  -- [[User:P.T. Aufrette|P.T. Aufrette]] ([[User talk:P.T. Aufrette|talk]]) 09:40, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
18965 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18960 +++$+++ 18964 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.298163000E09 +++$+++ Yup, but I find nowadays the problem is often too much material; it can take a huge amount of time to read it all, select just what is relevant and useful, and rearrange it all into some kind of coherent whole. Glad to see, by the way, that you have access to ODNB\u2014I'd assumed that you hadn't, since it's such an obvious starting point for the bio of anyone notable who is (A) British and (B) dead (and anybody can make the odd little mistake, even the ODNB). -- +++$+++ ::::Yup, but I find nowadays the problem is often too much material; it can take a huge amount of time to read it all, select just what is relevant and useful, and rearrange it all into some kind of coherent whole. Glad to see, by the way, that you have access to ODNB—I'd assumed that you hadn't, since it's such an obvious starting point for the bio of anyone notable who is (A) British and (B) dead (and anybody can make the odd little mistake, even the ODNB). --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 16:50, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
18966 +++$+++ P.T. Aufrette +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18960 +++$+++ 18965 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.298175660E09 +++$+++ Actually, I hadn't had access to it, I hit a login wall.  But after the article was featured I clicked on the citation link again on a hunch and now, for some reason, it is publicly accessible.  On page http:\/\/www.oxforddnb.com\/index\/36\/101036305\/ it even says \"Oxford DNB subscription required\" but clicking on \"View James Stirling complete biography\" lets you in anyway.  I wonder if it could possibly be in order to capitalize on the temporary Wikipedia publicity?  By the way, I did try the public domain 19th century DNB and 1901 supplement, but he doesn't seem to be there.  I admit I spent rather more time than I originally planned datamining and chasing down leads in Google... sometimes you get carried away with the thrill of the hunt. --  +++$+++ :::::Actually, I hadn't had access to it, I hit a login wall.  But after the article was featured I clicked on the citation link again on a hunch and now, for some reason, it is publicly accessible.  On page http://www.oxforddnb.com/index/36/101036305/ it even says "Oxford DNB subscription required" but clicking on "View James Stirling complete biography" lets you in anyway.  I wonder if it could possibly be in order to capitalize on the temporary Wikipedia publicity?  By the way, I did try the public domain 19th century DNB and 1901 supplement, but he doesn't seem to be there.  I admit I spent rather more time than I originally planned datamining and chasing down leads in Google... sometimes you get carried away with the thrill of the hunt. -- [[User:P.T. Aufrette|P.T. Aufrette]] ([[User talk:P.T. Aufrette|talk]]) 20:21, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
18967 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18960 +++$+++ 18966 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.298177580E09 +++$+++ I'd be happy to e-mail you the text of the occasional ODNB article now and again (just drop a note on my talk page - but you would have either to enable email in your preferences, or you could email me privately so I have an address to send it to). But as my time here is limited, if you want dozens of them, it would be better to ask at [[WP:REX]]. -- +++$+++ ::::::I'd be happy to e-mail you the text of the occasional ODNB article now and again (just drop a note on my talk page - but you would have either to enable email in your preferences, or you could email me privately so I have an address to send it to). But as my time here is limited, if you want dozens of them, it would be better to ask at [[WP:REX]]. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 20:53, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
18968 +++$+++ P.T. Aufrette +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18960 +++$+++ 18967 +++$+++ 2011-02-20 05:53:00 +++$+++ 1.298209980E09 +++$+++ OK, I'll keep it in mind, and I appreciate the offer. :) But for the moment I magically seem to be able to access other ODNB articles as well; for the longer term, well, I tend to move around from topic to topic randomly rather than systematically contributing to any one area. --  +++$+++ :::::::OK, I'll keep it in mind, and I appreciate the offer. :) But for the moment I magically seem to be able to access other ODNB articles as well; for the longer term, well, I tend to move around from topic to topic randomly rather than systematically contributing to any one area. -- [[User:P.T. Aufrette|P.T. Aufrette]] ([[User talk:P.T. Aufrette|talk]]) 05:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

543251 +++$+++ Lcarsdata +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543251 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-15 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.181966580E09 +++$+++ Please do not modify others comments, this is very bad wikiquette.  +++$+++ Please do not modify others comments, this is very bad wikiquette. [[User:Lcarsdata|Lcars]]'''[[User_talk:Lcarsdata|data]]''' 21:03, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
543252 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543251 +++$+++ 543251 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.181966760E09 +++$+++ I know, I was simply correcting Daniel's comment as I knew w\/ certainty that he left out the word \"second\" in his post. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I know, I was simply correcting Daniel's comment as I knew w/ certainty that he left out the word "second" in his post. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 21:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

543253 +++$+++ Hoponpop69 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-26 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.180248840E09 +++$+++ I filed it earlier this week and no one has done anything. I'd be more patient but he continues to vandalise pages under various users. It's a pretty open and shut case, and I'd appreciate it if you could help. Thank you. +++$+++ I filed it earlier this week and no one has done anything. I'd be more patient but he continues to vandalise pages under various users. It's a pretty open and shut case, and I'd appreciate it if you could help. Thank you.[[User:Hoponpop69|Hoponpop69]] 23:54, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
543254 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543253 +++$+++ 543253 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.180263060E09 +++$+++ I was able to block two of the three suspected sockpuppets, see my conclusions on the case page. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I was able to block two of the three suspected sockpuppets, see my conclusions on the case page. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 03:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

543255 +++$+++ Hoponpop69 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543255 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-27 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.180265640E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Also if you let me provide evidence for the third one I can prove it's a sock puppet, everyone edit that that ip made was a revert to one of his AFI-PUNK's edits. Furhtermore the IP was obviously coming from the same area as the other ip that was banned as most of the numbers in the ip adress where identical. +++$+++ Thank you. Also if you let me provide evidence for the third one I can prove it's a sock puppet, everyone edit that that ip made was a revert to one of his AFI-PUNK's edits. Furhtermore the IP was obviously coming from the same area as the other ip that was banned as most of the numbers in the ip adress where identical.[[User:Hoponpop69|Hoponpop69]] 04:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
543256 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543255 +++$+++ 543255 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.180265820E09 +++$+++ If you can provide me w\/ diffs that show me how AFI-PUNK's and 87.....'s edits are the same, I will have sufficient evidence to block that anon account. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :If you can provide me w/ diffs that show me how AFI-PUNK's and 87.....'s edits are the same, I will have sufficient evidence to block that anon account. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 04:37, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

281112 +++$+++ Keith-264 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-23 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.266993060E09 +++$+++ Regards Albrecht, I noticed your last edit. You're ignoring the last 25 years of research and historiography as well as John Terraine's championing since the 1960s if you think that the consensus about the battle is that it was a fiasco. The English literature version of the battle emphasises the cost to the British and the English history version sees it as one of the battles in 1916 which damaged the German army beyond repair and left its strategy to win the war in tatters.  +++$+++ Regards Albrecht, I noticed your last edit. You're ignoring the last 25 years of research and historiography as well as John Terraine's championing since the 1960s if you think that the consensus about the battle is that it was a fiasco. The English literature version of the battle emphasises the cost to the British and the English history version sees it as one of the battles in 1916 which damaged the German army beyond repair and left its strategy to win the war in tatters. [[User:Keith-264|Keith-264]] ([[User talk:Keith-264|talk]]) 22:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
281113 +++$+++ Keith-264 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281112 +++$+++ 281112 +++$+++ 2010-02-23 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.266997680E09 +++$+++ The Germans withdrew divisions from France because of the Brusilov Offensive as well as the Romanian gig. This was after the Germans and the Austro-Hungarians had stripped the Eastern Front in late 1915 on the assumption that the Russians were finished as an offensive force. They didn't have much choice and the effect on the German defence on the Somme was dire. The attempt to squeeze Germany on three fronts in 1916 misfired because of the Verdun campaign but what the Entente achieved left the Germans hanging on by their fingernails. You may see (with a substantial number of writers) the German withdrawal from the Somme in 1917 as unconnected to the inability of the German army to withstand a renewal of the inexorable battering it got in 1916, when the weather abated but British operations in the Ancre valley in early 1917 forced the Germans to retreat before the Hindenburg Line was complete. Tactically the British army went from disaster on 2\/3 of the attack front on the first day to the tactical sophistication of the contemporary French army (at least) by the end of the year. Huge German losses and the crisis of September-October 1916 followed. The arrival of the sort of equipment the army needed in early 1917 allowed the British army to match the German army by the time of Arras, hence the steady change in the balance of attrition from mid-1916 continued. 'Through German Eyes: The British and the Somme 1916' by Christopher Duffy uses contemporary German sources to arrive at similar conclusions. With 'German Strategy and the Path to Verdun: Erich Von Falkenhayn and the Development of Attrition, 1870-1916' by Robert T. Foley does the same for strategy and operations. I'd be interested in what you make of them. +++$+++ :The Germans withdrew divisions from France because of the Brusilov Offensive as well as the Romanian gig. This was after the Germans and the Austro-Hungarians had stripped the Eastern Front in late 1915 on the assumption that the Russians were finished as an offensive force. They didn't have much choice and the effect on the German defence on the Somme was dire. The attempt to squeeze Germany on three fronts in 1916 misfired because of the Verdun campaign but what the Entente achieved left the Germans hanging on by their fingernails. You may see (with a substantial number of writers) the German withdrawal from the Somme in 1917 as unconnected to the inability of the German army to withstand a renewal of the inexorable battering it got in 1916, when the weather abated but British operations in the Ancre valley in early 1917 forced the Germans to retreat before the Hindenburg Line was complete. Tactically the British army went from disaster on 2/3 of the attack front on the first day to the tactical sophistication of the contemporary French army (at least) by the end of the year. Huge German losses and the crisis of September-October 1916 followed. The arrival of the sort of equipment the army needed in early 1917 allowed the British army to match the German army by the time of Arras, hence the steady change in the balance of attrition from mid-1916 continued. 'Through German Eyes: The British and the Somme 1916' by Christopher Duffy uses contemporary German sources to arrive at similar conclusions. With 'German Strategy and the Path to Verdun: Erich Von Falkenhayn and the Development of Attrition, 1870-1916' by Robert T. Foley does the same for strategy and operations. I'd be interested in what you make of them.[[User:Keith-264|Keith-264]] ([[User talk:Keith-264|talk]]) 23:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
281114 +++$+++ Keith-264 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281112 +++$+++ 281112 +++$+++ 2010-02-27 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.267319400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply Albrecht. I think you make a good argument for your point of view, it's just that I disagree with it. I don't agree though that there are 70 years' worth of scholarship following the pessimist view. I suggest that this originated with the disillusion of the late 20s and Lloyd-George's scurrilous memoirs. John Terraine began to publicise a historical revison to what he saw (reasonably) as a polemical view of the Somme in particular and the Great War in general. He used plenty of primary sources as can be seen in 'The Educated Soldier' and the TradBBC 'The Great War'. I think the point about using divisions from the Somme is interesting. The Official History points out that they had been badly mauled on the Somme first. Using burnt out divisions anywhere was a sign of how overstretched the Germans became in the last quarter of 1916.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the reply Albrecht. I think you make a good argument for your point of view, it's just that I disagree with it. I don't agree though that there are 70 years' worth of scholarship following the pessimist view. I suggest that this originated with the disillusion of the late 20s and Lloyd-George's scurrilous memoirs. John Terraine began to publicise a historical revison to what he saw (reasonably) as a polemical view of the Somme in particular and the Great War in general. He used plenty of primary sources as can be seen in 'The Educated Soldier' and the TradBBC 'The Great War'. I think the point about using divisions from the Somme is interesting. The Official History points out that they had been badly mauled on the Somme first. Using burnt out divisions anywhere was a sign of how overstretched the Germans became in the last quarter of 1916. [[User:Keith-264|Keith-264]] ([[User talk:Keith-264|talk]]) 17:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
281115 +++$+++ Keith-264 +++$+++ Albrecht +++$+++ 281112 +++$+++ 281112 +++$+++ 2010-02-27 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.267326420E09 +++$+++ Perhaps what adds to uncertainty it the fact (i.e. beyond argument) that the victory wasn't the one intended - no breakthrough was obtained (were there any in this war? I thought that the Brusilov Offensive might qualify but having just read T Dowling's book it's clear that the Austro-Germans lost heavily but managed to retreat and re-make a front line each time the Russians had to pause. I bet it's the same for Caporetto). It was a victory by default and its strategic effect was as much to do with what didn't happen as what did. I sometimes wonder if Wiki material on the World Wars is as surprising to our readers as The GW series was to viewers in the early 60s? There's certainly a difference between historical scholarship and history writing. That said, orthodoxies and fashions come and go. I think that the 'revisions' of the last 30 years or so have been in one direction so I doubt they will be confounded. They look to me to be part of the historicisation of the war. You never know though;O) +++$+++ :Perhaps what adds to uncertainty it the fact (i.e. beyond argument) that the victory wasn't the one intended - no breakthrough was obtained (were there any in this war? I thought that the Brusilov Offensive might qualify but having just read T Dowling's book it's clear that the Austro-Germans lost heavily but managed to retreat and re-make a front line each time the Russians had to pause. I bet it's the same for Caporetto). It was a victory by default and its strategic effect was as much to do with what didn't happen as what did. I sometimes wonder if Wiki material on the World Wars is as surprising to our readers as The GW series was to viewers in the early 60s? There's certainly a difference between historical scholarship and history writing. That said, orthodoxies and fashions come and go. I think that the 'revisions' of the last 30 years or so have been in one direction so I doubt they will be confounded. They look to me to be part of the historicisation of the war. You never know though;O)[[User:Keith-264|Keith-264]] ([[User talk:Keith-264|talk]]) 19:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

18969 +++$+++ P.T. Aufrette +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-01 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.299049200E09 +++$+++ Well, the inexplicable and magical access to the ODNB only lasted a few days.  I just now edited [[Charlotte Dacre]] and noticed that there is a citation there, added by a previous editor, to the ODNB, but without any detail.  If it's convenient and you have a moment, could you possibly update that reference (perhaps using the {{tl|ODNBweb}} template). --  +++$+++ Well, the inexplicable and magical access to the ODNB only lasted a few days.  I just now edited [[Charlotte Dacre]] and noticed that there is a citation there, added by a previous editor, to the ODNB, but without any detail.  If it's convenient and you have a moment, could you possibly update that reference (perhaps using the {{tl|ODNBweb}} template). -- [[User:P.T. Aufrette|P.T. Aufrette]] ([[User talk:P.T. Aufrette|talk]]) 23:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
18970 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18969 +++$+++ 18969 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.299114600E09 +++$+++ {{done}}, no problem. I notice that ODNB have changed their security, so that after the normal logon screen, I'm now presented with a short list of institutions through which I might have access, and have to select one. That might explain why you had (unintended) access for a while, and why it's now gone. -- +++$+++ :{{done}}, no problem. I notice that ODNB have changed their security, so that after the normal logon screen, I'm now presented with a short list of institutions through which I might have access, and have to select one. That might explain why you had (unintended) access for a while, and why it's now gone. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 17:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

18971 +++$+++ Bob House 884 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18971 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-13 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.300059420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your suggestions, advice and generally helpful behaivour in relation to the [[McLibel case]] move, and of course for cleaning up after I messed up the close. Its greatly appreciated :-)  +++$+++ Thanks for your suggestions, advice and generally helpful behaivour in relation to the [[McLibel case]] move, and of course for cleaning up after I messed up the close. Its greatly appreciated :-) [[User:Bob House 884|Bob House 884]] ([[User talk:Bob House 884|talk]]) 16:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
18972 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18971 +++$+++ 18971 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.300059960E09 +++$+++ No problem, it's always a pleasure to help a new (and obviously useful) editor. And no need to worry that you \"messed up\" the close, you got it more or less right, just needed a little tweaking. It's moot anyway, since if a move discussion produces no opposition after a week or so, a formal WP:RM process isn't really necessary. -- +++$+++ :No problem, it's always a pleasure to help a new (and obviously useful) editor. And no need to worry that you "messed up" the close, you got it more or less right, just needed a little tweaking. It's moot anyway, since if a move discussion produces no opposition after a week or so, a formal WP:RM process isn't really necessary. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 16:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

18973 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-19 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.300552260E09 +++$+++ Just saw the photo on your user page - I don't know if you have come across it already but you may be interested in [[Sleeping Warrior]]. I have yet to find a decent Commons image but the Flickr photo is clear enough.  +++$+++ Just saw the photo on your user page - I don't know if you have come across it already but you may be interested in [[Sleeping Warrior]]. I have yet to find a decent Commons image but the Flickr photo is clear enough. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 09:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
18974 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18973 +++$+++ 18973 +++$+++ 2011-03-19 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.300553940E09 +++$+++ Er, yes, the last two edits on that page are mine! Not sure I'd want to replace the pic on my user page with one of the Sleeping Warrior, though. The best photo I've seen so far is one appearing on the cover of a book by the West Kilbride Amenity Society, a panoramic view of the Firth of Clyde from Tarbert Hill - the book itself has a lot of problems (for example, it has quite a bit on [[John Boyd Orr]], but doesn't mention that he won the Nobel Peace Prize) but its photography is very good. Maybe I should write to them and reqest a copy of the image, with a copyright release. But thanks for the suggestion. -- +++$+++ :Er, yes, the last two edits on that page are mine! Not sure I'd want to replace the pic on my user page with one of the Sleeping Warrior, though. The best photo I've seen so far is one appearing on the cover of a book by the West Kilbride Amenity Society, a panoramic view of the Firth of Clyde from Tarbert Hill - the book itself has a lot of problems (for example, it has quite a bit on [[John Boyd Orr]], but doesn't mention that he won the Nobel Peace Prize) but its photography is very good. Maybe I should write to them and reqest a copy of the image, with a copyright release. But thanks for the suggestion. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 09:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
18975 +++$+++ Ben MacDui +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18973 +++$+++ 18974 +++$+++ 2011-03-19 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.300559460E09 +++$+++ Sorry for being so dense - it has taken me the best part of 2 hrs to clear my watchlist this am and I was too quick to assume.  +++$+++ ::Sorry for being so dense - it has taken me the best part of 2 hrs to clear my watchlist this am and I was too quick to assume. [[User:Ben MacDui|<font color="#6495ED">Ben</font>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<font color="#C154C1">Mac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<font color="#228B22">Dui</font>]] 11:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
18976 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18973 +++$+++ 18975 +++$+++ 2011-03-19 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.300560240E09 +++$+++ No problem, nothing to apologise for. Thanks again. -- +++$+++ :::No problem, nothing to apologise for. Thanks again. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 11:44, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

543262 +++$+++ Hoponpop69 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-08 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.181293740E09 +++$+++ Hello? Are you there? Can you help me? +++$+++ Hello? Are you there? Can you help me?[[User:Hoponpop69|Hoponpop69]] 02:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
543263 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543262 +++$+++ 543262 +++$+++ 2007-06-08 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.181305140E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I was really busy with other things - yes I will look into it tomorrow morning Pacific Time. In German we have a saying, \"Besser spaet als nie\" (better late than never). Anyways, sorry for the delay. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Sorry, I was really busy with other things - yes I will look into it tomorrow morning Pacific Time. In German we have a saying, "Besser spaet als nie" (better late than never). Anyways, sorry for the delay. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 05:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

543264 +++$+++ Hoponpop69 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-09 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.181382000E09 +++$+++ Thank you, unfortunately I've found another one of his between this short time period.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/87.167.213.176] Hopefully you'll have all these accounts banned tommorow. +++$+++ Thank you, unfortunately I've found another one of his between this short time period.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/87.167.213.176] Hopefully you'll have all these accounts banned tommorow.[[User:Hoponpop69|Hoponpop69]] 02:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
543265 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543264 +++$+++ 543264 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.181467200E09 +++$+++ I'm going to look into it on Monday. I am sorry for the repeated delay - but I have been (and will continue) to be quite busy. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I'm going to look into it on Monday. I am sorry for the repeated delay - but I have been (and will continue) to be quite busy. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 02:20, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

18977 +++$+++ Mbz1 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-27 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.301273460E09 +++$+++ Hi, NSH001. I came here to admit that my first impression about you was incorrect. It was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Economic_history_of_the_Jews&diff=prev&oldid=420977558 this comment] that changed my mind. Although I will never accept any legitimacy in comparison the action of Israel to those of the fascists, but I have to admit that apparently not every such comparison means that a person, who made it is an antisemite. Regards.-- +++$+++ Hi, NSH001. I came here to admit that my first impression about you was incorrect. It was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Economic_history_of_the_Jews&diff=prev&oldid=420977558 this comment] that changed my mind. Although I will never accept any legitimacy in comparison the action of Israel to those of the fascists, but I have to admit that apparently not every such comparison means that a person, who made it is an antisemite. Regards.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 17:51, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
18978 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18977 +++$+++ 18977 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.301372280E09 +++$+++ On the subject of your problems on Wikipedia, I think part of the reason is that you only know half the story, and I'd like to take the liberty of reminding you that I recommended two books for you to read [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mbz1\/a7&diff=prev&oldid=400496063 here]. That will also take courage for you to do, since I'm sure you will find them painful to read, at least in part (in fact, I think you will find the book by the Palestinian woman less painful to read than the one by the Jewish woman, but that's just my guess). As I said before, I won't be at all offended if you choose not to read them. Meanwhile, here's another book you won't have any trouble at all with \u2013 the author is a herself a Holocaust survivor, a member of the [[Board of Deputies]] and a trustee of the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust. You could probably source several new DYK articles from it: Agnes Grunwald-Spier, ''The Other Schindlers: Why Some People Chose to Save Jews in the Holocaust'', The History Press, 2010. ISBN 978 0 7524 5706 2. Regards -- +++$+++ :On the subject of your problems on Wikipedia, I think part of the reason is that you only know half the story, and I'd like to take the liberty of reminding you that I recommended two books for you to read [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mbz1/a7&diff=prev&oldid=400496063 here]. That will also take courage for you to do, since I'm sure you will find them painful to read, at least in part (in fact, I think you will find the book by the Palestinian woman less painful to read than the one by the Jewish woman, but that's just my guess). As I said before, I won't be at all offended if you choose not to read them. Meanwhile, here's another book you won't have any trouble at all with – the author is a herself a Holocaust survivor, a member of the [[Board of Deputies]] and a trustee of the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust. You could probably source several new DYK articles from it: Agnes Grunwald-Spier, ''The Other Schindlers: Why Some People Chose to Save Jews in the Holocaust'', The History Press, 2010. ISBN 978 0 7524 5706 2. Regards --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 21:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

18979 +++$+++ Epeefleche +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-08 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.302310860E09 +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not add commentary or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles, as you did to [[Targeted killing]]. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.  Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> ''We don't tag articles such as targeted killing and abortion on the basis of one editor's POV that they are \"premeditated murder\".''  +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not add commentary or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles, as you did to [[Targeted killing]]. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.  Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> ''We don't tag articles such as targeted killing and abortion on the basis of one editor's POV that they are "premeditated murder".'' [[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 18:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
18980 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.302317160E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 19:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
18981 +++$+++ Epeefleche +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18980 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.302318060E09 +++$+++ Some people think one should not template the newbies, others says the same about the regulars.  What you point to, as you know, is not a wp policy.  It is the advice or opinion of one or more Wikipedia contributors. Essays may represent widespread norms or minority viewpoints. You have 8,000 edits, and I am sure you can understand that the template, accompanied by the explanation, serves to describe the issue I have with your edit.  Your edit was pure POV -- we know that because of your edit summary, in which you explained your personal POV rationale for your edit.  We don't call abortion premeditated murder because an editor has that POV; same here, and same with all POV edits that stem from a similar POV.  That analogy is precisely on point -- some editors have a POV along those lines, as you do here, but we do not allow them to make the edit that you did here based on that POV.  Furthermore, as you know because you have read the guideline that the template points to, the guideline extends to categories. -- +++$+++ ::Some people think one should not template the newbies, others says the same about the regulars.  What you point to, as you know, is not a wp policy.  It is the advice or opinion of one or more Wikipedia contributors. Essays may represent widespread norms or minority viewpoints. You have 8,000 edits, and I am sure you can understand that the template, accompanied by the explanation, serves to describe the issue I have with your edit.  Your edit was pure POV -- we know that because of your edit summary, in which you explained your personal POV rationale for your edit.  We don't call abortion premeditated murder because an editor has that POV; same here, and same with all POV edits that stem from a similar POV.  That analogy is precisely on point -- some editors have a POV along those lines, as you do here, but we do not allow them to make the edit that you did here based on that POV.  Furthermore, as you know because you have read the guideline that the template points to, the guideline extends to categories. --[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 20:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
18982 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18981 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.302320460E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 20:41, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
18983 +++$+++ Epeefleche +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18982 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.302325920E09 +++$+++ I'm unclear what \"falsehoods\" you are asserting.  I'm not intending to make any false statements.  You added a cat.  The addition was explained by your edit summary.  That edit summary reflected a clear POV reason for your addition of the cat.  Adding cats on the basis of POV is conduct clearly covered by the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]].  I brought all of this to your attention.  All of this is factual, and anyone reviewing the history can read your edit summary, see your edit, and read the policy to confirm its factual basis.  I'm confused as to why you label pointing out such truths, easily verified, as \"outrageous falsehood\", \"offensive behaviour\", a \"falsehood or falsehoods\", \"false statements\", \"attempts to harass\", \"disruptive\", \"aggressive conduct\", and \"completely bogus\".  It's not an issue as to whether I \"like\" or \"dislike\" your POV -- it is simply an issue that your edit is clearly POV, as described in the guideline (I'm sure you don't want me to take up space quoting it for you, as I've already linked to it twice), and POV cat additions of that sort are clearly not appropriate per the guideline.  I would suggest, that when one points out to you that you are falling on the wrong side of a guideline, and points out why, a response of \"that's an aggressive, offensive, disruptive, bogus, malicious, intimidatory, outrageous false statement or statements and attack\" does not hold much water when the facts indicate quite the opposite.-- +++$+++ ::::I'm unclear what "falsehoods" you are asserting.  I'm not intending to make any false statements.  You added a cat.  The addition was explained by your edit summary.  That edit summary reflected a clear POV reason for your addition of the cat.  Adding cats on the basis of POV is conduct clearly covered by the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]].  I brought all of this to your attention.  All of this is factual, and anyone reviewing the history can read your edit summary, see your edit, and read the policy to confirm its factual basis.  I'm confused as to why you label pointing out such truths, easily verified, as "outrageous falsehood", "offensive behaviour", a "falsehood or falsehoods", "false statements", "attempts to harass", "disruptive", "aggressive conduct", and "completely bogus".  It's not an issue as to whether I "like" or "dislike" your POV -- it is simply an issue that your edit is clearly POV, as described in the guideline (I'm sure you don't want me to take up space quoting it for you, as I've already linked to it twice), and POV cat additions of that sort are clearly not appropriate per the guideline.  I would suggest, that when one points out to you that you are falling on the wrong side of a guideline, and points out why, a response of "that's an aggressive, offensive, disruptive, bogus, malicious, intimidatory, outrageous false statement or statements and attack" does not hold much water when the facts indicate quite the opposite.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 22:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
18984 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18983 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.302330180E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::::--[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 23:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
18985 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 2011-04-09 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.302352680E09 +++$+++ Epeefleche has previous form for this sort of disruptive time-wasting. Any readers of this page who would like some amusement should [[User talk:Nishidani\/Archive 9#Request for Enforcement|click on this link]], where they can read accurate and perceptive assessments of Ep's behaviour. -- +++$+++ * Epeefleche has previous form for this sort of disruptive time-wasting. Any readers of this page who would like some amusement should [[User talk:Nishidani/Archive 9#Request for Enforcement|click on this link]], where they can read accurate and perceptive assessments of Ep's behaviour. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 05:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
18986 +++$+++ ZScarpia  +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18985 +++$+++ 2011-04-09 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.302383400E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/block&page=User%3AEpeefleche Looks as though] Epeefleche cleared himself of the sockpuppetry allegations. NSH, hope you won't be offended, but I think that you should delete this postscript.   <span style=\"font-family: Perpetua, serif; font-size:120%\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;\u2190&nbsp;&nbsp; +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AEpeefleche Looks as though] Epeefleche cleared himself of the sockpuppetry allegations. NSH, hope you won't be offended, but I think that you should delete this postscript.   <span style="font-family: Perpetua, serif; font-size:120%">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;←&nbsp;&nbsp;[[User talk:ZScarpia | ZScarpia]]&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> 14:10, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
18987 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18986 +++$+++ 2011-04-09 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.302396060E09 +++$+++ Thanks, ZScarpia, of course I am not offended, you are always welcome to comment here, and if I have made a mistake (regardless of who draws it to my attention), I am always happy to correct it. The block log you linked to isn't very clear, but on investigating further, it appears that Ep did indeed <s>engage in sockpuppetry<\/s> operate multiple accounts, but in a way that was only a minor infraction of the rules. See the discussion [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Epeefleche\/Archive_1#Blocked.3B_Block_lifted_on_Appeal here] (I hadn't checked that archive, as Ep labels it \"(6\/07-8\/09)\" on his main talk page). Accordingly, I have struck out the sockpuppetry line above. -- +++$+++ :::Thanks, ZScarpia, of course I am not offended, you are always welcome to comment here, and if I have made a mistake (regardless of who draws it to my attention), I am always happy to correct it. The block log you linked to isn't very clear, but on investigating further, it appears that Ep did indeed <s>engage in sockpuppetry</s> operate multiple accounts, but in a way that was only a minor infraction of the rules. See the discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Epeefleche/Archive_1#Blocked.3B_Block_lifted_on_Appeal here] (I hadn't checked that archive, as Ep labels it "(6/07-8/09)" on his main talk page). Accordingly, I have struck out the sockpuppetry line above. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 17:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
18988 +++$+++ Epeefleche +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18987 +++$+++ 2011-04-09 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.302400920E09 +++$+++ While you don't want me to edit here, I'm not required to sit by while you state untruths in your personal attacks on me -- attacks that have nothing to do with my above warning to you regarding your editing.  It was found that the multiple accounts I used were appropriate, in line with our guidelines for appropriate use of multiple accounts, but I suggested that I would keep to one account so as to not raise even the spectre of socking -- feel free to contact the sysop in question.  In the meantime, please your untruthful personal attacks that, as I said, have nothing to do with my warnings to you.  If you have a problem with that, we can always bring it to a noticeboard to have the community opine on your behavior.-- +++$+++ ::::While you don't want me to edit here, I'm not required to sit by while you state untruths in your personal attacks on me -- attacks that have nothing to do with my above warning to you regarding your editing.  It was found that the multiple accounts I used were appropriate, in line with our guidelines for appropriate use of multiple accounts, but I suggested that I would keep to one account so as to not raise even the spectre of socking -- feel free to contact the sysop in question.  In the meantime, please your untruthful personal attacks that, as I said, have nothing to do with my warnings to you.  If you have a problem with that, we can always bring it to a noticeboard to have the community opine on your behavior.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 19:02, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
18989 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18988 +++$+++ 2011-04-09 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.302403680E09 +++$+++ I haven't got time to plough through the contribution records of multiple accounts, but I have amended the above to more accurately reflect what I read in your archive. I am sorry if I might have given the wrong impression, as that was not my intention, thinking it sufficient to have struck the main allegation. While you are here, might I suggest that you label your archive(s) correctly, as that might help avoid future problems? Thanks. -- +++$+++ :::::I haven't got time to plough through the contribution records of multiple accounts, but I have amended the above to more accurately reflect what I read in your archive. I am sorry if I might have given the wrong impression, as that was not my intention, thinking it sufficient to have struck the main allegation. While you are here, might I suggest that you label your archive(s) correctly, as that might help avoid future problems? Thanks. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 19:48, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
18990 +++$+++ Epeefleche +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18989 +++$+++ 2011-04-09 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.302412380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the improvement.  In response to your comment to me, though, there was ''no infraction'' of the rules -- not even a minor one.  Feel free to contact the unblocking sysop, who assured me of as much off-wiki.  As to my archives, I think they're in pretty good shape.  Though if there is a material issue as to my archives that relates in any way to my warning to you (i.e., not relating to your un-related attack discussed above), feel free to point it out here.  If it is not material, or if it is unrelated to your editing that led to this thread, no need to respond.  Thanks.-- +++$+++ ::::::Thanks for the improvement.  In response to your comment to me, though, there was ''no infraction'' of the rules -- not even a minor one.  Feel free to contact the unblocking sysop, who assured me of as much off-wiki.  As to my archives, I think they're in pretty good shape.  Though if there is a material issue as to my archives that relates in any way to my warning to you (i.e., not relating to your un-related attack discussed above), feel free to point it out here.  If it is not material, or if it is unrelated to your editing that led to this thread, no need to respond.  Thanks.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 22:13, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
18991 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18990 +++$+++ 2011-04-09 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.302414540E09 +++$+++ You should learn to read more carefully. I said above that you labelled your archive  \"(6\/07-8\/09)\" (when in fact it covers much more recent material as well) so I didn't bother looking there (first time round). As to whether or not there is an infraction, I invite readers of this page to look at both the SPI report and your archive, linked above. -- +++$+++ :::::::You should learn to read more carefully. I said above that you labelled your archive  "(6/07-8/09)" (when in fact it covers much more recent material as well) so I didn't bother looking there (first time round). As to whether or not there is an infraction, I invite readers of this page to look at both the SPI report and your archive, linked above. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 22:49, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
18992 +++$+++ Epeefleche +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18991 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.302526140E09 +++$+++ I see your response does not relate to my pointing out to you above, at the top of this string, your problematic editing.  All it does is reiterate your wholly unrelated personal attack.  I would suggest that when someone points out a problem with you violating a wp guideline, it might perhaps be considered more within wp:civil for you to do something other than manufacture a personal attack that is untruthful, and which is completely unrelated to the concern about your editing.  Editors could, fyi, see this as a violation of wp guidelines, and seek appropriate action with regard to your editing privileges.  If you have any questions as to whether what I have stated above is true -- please contact the indicated sysop.  Otherwise, please stop spreading misinformation, or I will ask for intervention at the appropriate noticeboard.  Best.-- +++$+++ ::::::::I see your response does not relate to my pointing out to you above, at the top of this string, your problematic editing.  All it does is reiterate your wholly unrelated personal attack.  I would suggest that when someone points out a problem with you violating a wp guideline, it might perhaps be considered more within wp:civil for you to do something other than manufacture a personal attack that is untruthful, and which is completely unrelated to the concern about your editing.  Editors could, fyi, see this as a violation of wp guidelines, and seek appropriate action with regard to your editing privileges.  If you have any questions as to whether what I have stated above is true -- please contact the indicated sysop.  Otherwise, please stop spreading misinformation, or I will ask for intervention at the appropriate noticeboard.  Best.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 05:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
18993 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18979 +++$+++ 18992 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 07:39:00 +++$+++ 1.302532740E09 +++$+++ Let's be quite clear about this: there is nothing at all problematic about my editing, and you probably know, deep down, that that is the case. If you think that it is \"problematic\", then raise it on an appropriate board for others to comment. I don't think you will get very far if you do. I am happy to correct a genuine error of mine if someone points it out, but I have already told you '''stay off my talk page''' if all you want to do is post time-wasting nonsense. -- +++$+++ :::::::::Let's be quite clear about this: there is nothing at all problematic about my editing, and you probably know, deep down, that that is the case. If you think that it is "problematic", then raise it on an appropriate board for others to comment. I don't think you will get very far if you do. I am happy to correct a genuine error of mine if someone points it out, but I have already told you '''stay off my talk page''' if all you want to do is post time-wasting nonsense. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 07:39, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

543268 +++$+++ Hoponpop69 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-12 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.181661600E09 +++$+++ I'm upset about this. The more you wait the more articles he vandalises. This is an open and shut case, can't you just block him and his ip range? +++$+++ I'm upset about this. The more you wait the more articles he vandalises. This is an open and shut case, can't you just block him and his ip range?[[User:Hoponpop69|Hoponpop69]] 08:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
543269 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543268 +++$+++ 543268 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.181735520E09 +++$+++ No I can't block is IP range. If you could point to certain article that he\/she continously vandlises (so I don't have to sift through the edit history of all these IPs, I can protect those articles until he\/she loses interest. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :No I can't block is IP range. If you could point to certain article that he/she continously vandlises (so I don't have to sift through the edit history of all these IPs, I can protect those articles until he/she loses interest. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 04:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
543270 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543268 +++$+++ 543268 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.181735640E09 +++$+++ I blocked the main account (incld. a block on account creation) due to incivility and sockpuppetry. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I blocked the main account (incld. a block on account creation) due to incivility and sockpuppetry. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 04:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

543271 +++$+++ Hoponpop69 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-14 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.181812020E09 +++$+++ Why was he blocked for 48hours? Every single edit he's made has had to be reverted? Allowing him back, and he's just gonna start causing all these problems again, I guarantee that to you. +++$+++ Why was he blocked for 48hours? Every single edit he's made has had to be reverted? Allowing him back, and he's just gonna start causing all these problems again, I guarantee that to you.[[User:Hoponpop69|Hoponpop69]] 02:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
543272 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543271 +++$+++ 543271 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.181813700E09 +++$+++ I'll be watching - don't worry. I must assume good faith - even in this case. I'll give him\/her a second chance. If he\/she continues I'll block him\/her very quickly. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I'll be watching - don't worry. I must assume good faith - even in this case. I'll give him/her a second chance. If he/she continues I'll block him/her very quickly. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 02:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

543276 +++$+++ Hoponpop69 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-17 22:42:00 +++$+++ 1.182145320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Hoponpop69|Hoponpop69]] 22:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
543277 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543276 +++$+++ 543276 +++$+++ 2007-06-17 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.182146760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Seraphim Whipp|Seraphim Whipp]] 23:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

614834 +++$+++ Alienus +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614834 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-18 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.150675380E09 +++$+++ Am I wrong to be concerned?  +++$+++ Am I wrong to be concerned? [[User:Alienus|<font color="darkcyan">Al</font>]] 17:03, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
614835 +++$+++ Alienus +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614834 +++$+++ 614834 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.150699380E09 +++$+++ On a side note, he's continued to censor his talk page.  http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Nandesuka&curid=3199574&diff=59121872&oldid=59120805  +++$+++ :On a side note, he's continued to censor his talk page.  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nandesuka&curid=3199574&diff=59121872&oldid=59120805 [[User:Alienus|<font color="darkcyan">Al</font>]] 23:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

543278 +++$+++ Hoponpop69 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-19 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.182242100E09 +++$+++ Brendel, strike one was you not responding to me yesterday, strike two is you not responding today, if nothing is done tommorow, I am through with wikipedia. +++$+++ Brendel, strike one was you not responding to me yesterday, strike two is you not responding today, if nothing is done tommorow, I am through with wikipedia.[[User:Hoponpop69|Hoponpop69]] 01:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
543279 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543278 +++$+++ 543278 +++$+++ 2007-06-19 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.182254940E09 +++$+++ I am quite busy with other projects, please report this sockpuppetry case to the appropriate noticeboard. I simply don't have the time to look through the edits of dozens of IPs in order to see whether or not they are sockpuppets of the user in question. I have little understanding of the subject matter and what is obvious vandalism to you, may not neccessarily recognizable to me as such. Before a block an account I need to make sure that it is a sockpuppet - doing so requires a lot of effort for me in this case. After spending a lot of time looking through contributions histories I was able to identify and block two sockpuppets as well as issue a 48h block on the main account. But administrators are not detectives. So, please [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets|report sockpuppets here.]] Please document and present your proof clearly so admins don't have to go out doing detective work. Thank you. Best Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I am quite busy with other projects, please report this sockpuppetry case to the appropriate noticeboard. I simply don't have the time to look through the edits of dozens of IPs in order to see whether or not they are sockpuppets of the user in question. I have little understanding of the subject matter and what is obvious vandalism to you, may not neccessarily recognizable to me as such. Before a block an account I need to make sure that it is a sockpuppet - doing so requires a lot of effort for me in this case. After spending a lot of time looking through contributions histories I was able to identify and block two sockpuppets as well as issue a 48h block on the main account. But administrators are not detectives. So, please [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets|report sockpuppets here.]] Please document and present your proof clearly so admins don't have to go out doing detective work. Thank you. Best Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 05:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

281135 +++$+++ WAvegetarian +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281135 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-04 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.144135140E09 +++$+++ What the heck? I mean, who do you think you are to revert the fun, the [[Grinch]]? ;-)&mdash; +++$+++ What the heck? I mean, who do you think you are to revert the fun, the [[Grinch]]? ;-)&mdash;[[User:WAvegetarian|WAvegetarian]]&bull;<small><sub><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WAvegetarian|CONTRIBUTIONS]]</sub></sub><sup><sup><span style="position: relative; left:-64px; margin-right:-64px;">[[User talk:WAvegetarian|TALK]]</span></sup></sup><big>&bull; </big><sup><sup>[[Special:Emailuser/WAvegetarian|EMAIL]]</sup></sup></small><span style="position: relative; left:+6px; margin-right:+6px;">&bull;</span> 00:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
281136 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281135 +++$+++ 281135 +++$+++ 2006-04-04 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.144136220E09 +++$+++ omigosh the f word! *reverts*  +++$+++ : omigosh the f word! *reverts* [[User:Deadkid dk|deadkid_dk]] 00:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

281137 +++$+++ Oleg Alexandrov +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-12 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.144909380E09 +++$+++ --><p>When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for [[WP:-(|vandalism]] and may be [[WP:RV|reverted]], so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. <\/p><!-- Template:Summary -->  &ndash;  +++$+++ --><p>When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for [[WP:-(|vandalism]] and may be [[WP:RV|reverted]], so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. </p><!-- Template:Summary -->  &ndash; [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] ([[User talk:Oleg Alexandrov|talk]]) 23:23, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
281138 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281137 +++$+++ 281137 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.144909800E09 +++$+++ *cries*  +++$+++ : *cries* [[User:Deadkid dk|deadkid_dk]] 23:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

18994 +++$+++ Nishidani +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-22 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.303504620E09 +++$+++ For that sterling fix of my dishevelled page, beyond the call of all duty. It will of course assist the usual purity patrol of kibitzers in digging up 'dirt' for the inevitable attempts to run up further material to make one's charge sheet look like shit, but that is incidental to its poiposes, which is to enable a dull geezer like myself keep check on what the hell he said, when and where! Best  +++$+++ For that sterling fix of my dishevelled page, beyond the call of all duty. It will of course assist the usual purity patrol of kibitzers in digging up 'dirt' for the inevitable attempts to run up further material to make one's charge sheet look like shit, but that is incidental to its poiposes, which is to enable a dull geezer like myself keep check on what the hell he said, when and where! Best [[User:Nishidani|Nishidani]] ([[User talk:Nishidani|talk]]) 13:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
18995 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18994 +++$+++ 18994 +++$+++ 2011-04-22 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.303507140E09 +++$+++ Well you should really thank the guys who wrote the indexing bot, and the {{tl|archives}} template and its sub-templates. It's taken me more than 4 years to accumulate enough verbiage to spill onto more than one archive, so having done the research to index my own archives properly, it's very little work to do the same for you. And don't forget, shit makes excellent fertiliser, especially for a man of your hortative, err, horticultural talents. -- +++$+++ :Well you should really thank the guys who wrote the indexing bot, and the {{tl|archives}} template and its sub-templates. It's taken me more than 4 years to accumulate enough verbiage to spill onto more than one archive, so having done the research to index my own archives properly, it's very little work to do the same for you. And don't forget, shit makes excellent fertiliser, especially for a man of your hortative, err, horticultural talents. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 14:19, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

543283 +++$+++ Alan De Smet +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-30 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.180592280E09 +++$+++ Could you explain your thinking behind [[:Image:American Income.png]] and [[:Image:American Society.jpg]]?  I think the information in both is valuable, but I don't understand the value of the decoration you've done with it.  American Income.png appears to be a picture of text; it would seem like actual text would be better in articles as it could be more easily edited and searched.  I'm tenatively planning on replacing all uses of it with equivalent text in articles.  American Society.jpg, on the other hand, does seem like data best presented in graphical form, but the unnecessary decoration clouds the fundamental data.  I'm planning on replacing it with a simple stacked single-bar chart.  \u2014  +++$+++ Could you explain your thinking behind [[:Image:American Income.png]] and [[:Image:American Society.jpg]]?  I think the information in both is valuable, but I don't understand the value of the decoration you've done with it.  American Income.png appears to be a picture of text; it would seem like actual text would be better in articles as it could be more easily edited and searched.  I'm tenatively planning on replacing all uses of it with equivalent text in articles.  American Society.jpg, on the other hand, does seem like data best presented in graphical form, but the unnecessary decoration clouds the fundamental data.  I'm planning on replacing it with a simple stacked single-bar chart.  — [[User:Alan De Smet|Alan De&nbsp;Smet]] | [[User talk:Alan De Smet|Talk]] 23:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
543284 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543283 +++$+++ 543283 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.180593660E09 +++$+++ The thinking is simple. People respond best to visual cues. The thinking is the same as is periodicals who go out of their way to decorate their graphs or textbooks who feature \"Fun Facts\" in blue-bordered boxes on yellow background. It is supposed to make the information easier and to digest through making it more visually exciting. I used the high rise to add some meaning to the income quintile concept in [[:Image:American Society.jpg]] - the image is quite clear, if American society was a high-rise where floor corresponds w\/ income-the quintiles would occupy the following floors. I adds more meaning to the concept than a mere bar graph IMHO. [[:Image:American Income.png]] I used the background graphics to convey information in a more exciting & appealing manner. As you said in the heading of this seciton it is an \"Artisitic display of information.\" <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :The thinking is simple. People respond best to visual cues. The thinking is the same as is periodicals who go out of their way to decorate their graphs or textbooks who feature "Fun Facts" in blue-bordered boxes on yellow background. It is supposed to make the information easier and to digest through making it more visually exciting. I used the high rise to add some meaning to the income quintile concept in [[:Image:American Society.jpg]] - the image is quite clear, if American society was a high-rise where floor corresponds w/ income-the quintiles would occupy the following floors. I adds more meaning to the concept than a mere bar graph IMHO. [[:Image:American Income.png]] I used the background graphics to convey information in a more exciting & appealing manner. As you said in the heading of this seciton it is an "Artisitic display of information." <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 23:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
543285 +++$+++ Alan De Smet +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543283 +++$+++ 543284 +++$+++ 2007-06-01 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.180686000E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the intent, but I think it's the wrong way to go.  In the case of [[:Image:American Income.png]] it's very problematic: it's harder to edit, harder to review edits, harder to search, and basically inaccessable for people who cannot see.  Replacing it with simple text would be a clear win.  I still plan on replacing it.  As for [[:Image:American Society.jpg]], I still believe that a simple graph would be better.  Wikipedia isn't a textbook for disinterested students, or the graph guy for ''USA Today'' trying to add color.  Someone visiting Wikipedia presumably wants good information, and we should minimize needless decoration, providing more pure information. \u2014  +++$+++ ::I appreciate the intent, but I think it's the wrong way to go.  In the case of [[:Image:American Income.png]] it's very problematic: it's harder to edit, harder to review edits, harder to search, and basically inaccessable for people who cannot see.  Replacing it with simple text would be a clear win.  I still plan on replacing it.  As for [[:Image:American Society.jpg]], I still believe that a simple graph would be better.  Wikipedia isn't a textbook for disinterested students, or the graph guy for ''USA Today'' trying to add color.  Someone visiting Wikipedia presumably wants good information, and we should minimize needless decoration, providing more pure information. — [[User:Alan De Smet|Alan De&nbsp;Smet]] | [[User talk:Alan De Smet|Talk]] 01:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
543286 +++$+++ Alan De Smet +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543283 +++$+++ 543285 +++$+++ 2007-06-01 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.180766100E09 +++$+++ [[Image talk:American Income.png]] is probably a better place to discuss that image; I've resummarized my comments there. \u2014  +++$+++ :::[[Image talk:American Income.png]] is probably a better place to discuss that image; I've resummarized my comments there. — [[User:Alan De Smet|Alan De&nbsp;Smet]] | [[User talk:Alan De Smet|Talk]] 23:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

18996 +++$+++ Magioladitis +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18996 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-09 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.304977140E09 +++$+++ [[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Infobox triathlete]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Infobox triathlete|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]].<!--Template:Tfdnotice-->  +++$+++ [[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Infobox triathlete]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Infobox triathlete|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 14:39, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
18997 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18996 +++$+++ 18996 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.304982240E09 +++$+++ Responded on Magioladitis's talk page, and on the TfD page, where I have suggested the nom be withdrawn. -- +++$+++ :Responded on Magioladitis's talk page, and on the TfD page, where I have suggested the nom be withdrawn. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 16:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
18998 +++$+++ AgadaUrbanit +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18996 +++$+++ 18996 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 07:38:00 +++$+++ 1.305038280E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Name_of_Armenia&diff=prev&oldid=428385028 Socks Socks Socks everywhere]. I'd better be disruptive.  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Name_of_Armenia&diff=prev&oldid=428385028 Socks Socks Socks everywhere]. I'd better be disruptive. [[User:AgadaUrbanit|AgadaUrbanit]] ([[User talk:AgadaUrbanit|talk]]) 07:38, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
18999 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18996 +++$+++ 18998 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.305038520E09 +++$+++ Err, what on earth has that got to do with me? -- +++$+++ ::Err, what on earth has that got to do with me? --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 07:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
19000 +++$+++ AgadaUrbanit +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18996 +++$+++ 18999 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.305062760E09 +++$+++ Well maybe I do need to get a life instead of trying to make a sarcastic remark that might appear as if I am trying to eliminate opposition. Anyway I apologize if I have been out of line here. Harassing you was never my intention. I am just amused that someone cared. Thank you for your comment, socks could be annoying, but they don't have to, and maybe you're right certain discussion threads should be shorter. I can also see your point, though not fully agree with you. So uh hmm, sorry.  +++$+++ :::Well maybe I do need to get a life instead of trying to make a sarcastic remark that might appear as if I am trying to eliminate opposition. Anyway I apologize if I have been out of line here. Harassing you was never my intention. I am just amused that someone cared. Thank you for your comment, socks could be annoying, but they don't have to, and maybe you're right certain discussion threads should be shorter. I can also see your point, though not fully agree with you. So uh hmm, sorry. [[User:AgadaUrbanit|AgadaUrbanit]] ([[User talk:AgadaUrbanit|talk]]) 14:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
19001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 18996 +++$+++ 18996 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.309807440E09 +++$+++ I spend a lot of time on triathlon bios, but concentrating mainly on the very top triathletes. I really don't consider myself an \"expert\" on the criteria that make a triathlete notable (or not), though I have PRODed or AfD-ed a few obvious cases. I'm aware that the section on triathletes in [[WP:NSPORT]] needs some work - it's been on my \"to-do\" list for some time. I'll give the matter some thought, but it may be a day or two before I respond. -- +++$+++ :I spend a lot of time on triathlon bios, but concentrating mainly on the very top triathletes. I really don't consider myself an "expert" on the criteria that make a triathlete notable (or not), though I have PRODed or AfD-ed a few obvious cases. I'm aware that the section on triathletes in [[WP:NSPORT]] needs some work - it's been on my "to-do" list for some time. I'll give the matter some thought, but it may be a day or two before I respond. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 12:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

527454 +++$+++ Sergeant Gerzi +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.167790440E09 +++$+++ Ah, thanks. Well, can I send you an e-mail? I'd like to tell you my problems with a mail.  +++$+++ Ah, thanks. Well, can I send you an e-mail? I'd like to tell you my problems with a mail. [[User:Sergeant Gerzi|Sergeant Gerzi]] 18:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
527455 +++$+++ Sergeant Gerzi +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527454 +++$+++ 527454 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.167866280E09 +++$+++ OK, I've sent you a mail. Give me a shout if you haven't received it.  +++$+++ :OK, I've sent you a mail. Give me a shout if you haven't received it. [[User:Sergeant Gerzi|Sergeant Gerzi]] 15:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
527456 +++$+++ Sergeant Gerzi +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527454 +++$+++ 527455 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.167954600E09 +++$+++ Have you received my mail?  +++$+++ ::Have you received my mail? [[User:Sergeant Gerzi|Sergeant Gerzi]] 15:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
527457 +++$+++ Sergeant Gerzi +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527454 +++$+++ 527456 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.168124760E09 +++$+++ OK, I've sent you another mail.  +++$+++ :::OK, I've sent you another mail. [[User:Sergeant Gerzi|Sergeant Gerzi]] 15:06, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

281142 +++$+++ Tawker +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-23 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.145799360E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Your gallery says it all, those are some great well utilized pictures, keep up the good work!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Your gallery says it all, those are some great well utilized pictures, keep up the good work! [[User:Tawker|Tawker]] 06:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
281143 +++$+++ Tawker +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281142 +++$+++ 281142 +++$+++ 2006-04-23 07:06:00 +++$+++ 1.145801160E09 +++$+++ Hey, you deserved it, you saved me from having to rent a Cessna and bribe a friend to take me sightseeing for photos :) --  +++$+++ :Hey, you deserved it, you saved me from having to rent a Cessna and bribe a friend to take me sightseeing for photos :) -- [[User:Tawker|Tawker]] 07:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

46857 +++$+++ Confession0791 +++$+++ Ltwin +++$+++ 46857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-20 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.308602160E09 +++$+++ --''' +++$+++ --'''[[User:Confession0791|Confession0791]]''' '''[[User_talk:Confession0791|<sup>talk</sup>]]''' 13:36, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
46858 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ Ltwin +++$+++ 46857 +++$+++ 46857 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308781320E09 +++$+++ Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives\u2014which houses some of America's most important historical documents\u2014is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/NARA\/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]].  +++$+++ :Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]]. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

481865 +++$+++ MoonGoddess +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481865 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-24 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.156442760E09 +++$+++ I will check those links, thanks.  +++$+++ I will check those links, thanks. [[User:MoonGoddess|Darlene]] 11:06, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
481866 +++$+++ 71.250.145.62 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 481865 +++$+++ 481865 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.156477440E09 +++$+++ It's only fitting that a [[Mets]] fan should protect a [[Yankees|Yankee]]-related article.  +++$+++ :It's only fitting that a [[Mets]] fan should protect a [[Yankees|Yankee]]-related article. [[User:71.250.145.62|71.250.145.62]] 20:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

281147 +++$+++ Miborovsky +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-16 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.147773240E09 +++$+++ Here's the deal. We need a place to coordinate work on Chinese military history. Therefore, I am proposing to start a ''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history#Task forces|task force]]'' for this purpose. But before we can go ahead with it, I need to make sure that there is enough contributors to sustain this effort. The [[Wikipedia:China-related topics notice board|China-related topics notice board]] died of neglect and if we create this task force we need to be committed to it or it will suffer the same fate. I'm asking for your opinions on this matter, whether it's a good idea or not, if you'd be interested in it, and what suggestions you might have. Also, if you know anyone else who would be interested in this, please inform them as well. -- <font color=\"#FF0000\">'''\u041c\u0438\u0431\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439'''<\/font> <sup>[[User:Miborovsky|U]]|[[User talk:Miborovsky|T]]|[[Special:Contributions\/Miborovsky|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser\/Miborovsky|M]]|[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]| +++$+++ Here's the deal. We need a place to coordinate work on Chinese military history. Therefore, I am proposing to start a ''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history#Task forces|task force]]'' for this purpose. But before we can go ahead with it, I need to make sure that there is enough contributors to sustain this effort. The [[Wikipedia:China-related topics notice board|China-related topics notice board]] died of neglect and if we create this task force we need to be committed to it or it will suffer the same fate. I'm asking for your opinions on this matter, whether it's a good idea or not, if you'd be interested in it, and what suggestions you might have. Also, if you know anyone else who would be interested in this, please inform them as well. -- <font color="#FF0000">'''Миборовский'''</font> <sup>[[User:Miborovsky|U]]|[[User talk:Miborovsky|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Miborovsky|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Miborovsky|M]]|[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]|[[User:Miborovsky#Wiki-not-so-fun|Chugoku Banzai]]!</sup> 02:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
281148 +++$+++ Miborovsky +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281147 +++$+++ 281147 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.148113320E09 +++$+++ Hey there! The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Chinese military history task force|Chinese military history task force]] has been created! Please help us expand Wikipedia's coverage of the military history of China. Feel free to list you name [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Chinese military history task force#Participants|here]], and invite your friends too! ;) -- <font color=\"#FF0000\">'''\u041c\u0438\u0431\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439'''<\/font> <sup>[[User:Miborovsky|U]]|[[User talk:Miborovsky|T]]|[[Special:Contributions\/Miborovsky|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser\/Miborovsky|M]]|[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color=\"green\">E<\/font>]]| +++$+++ :Hey there! The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Chinese military history task force|Chinese military history task force]] has been created! Please help us expand Wikipedia's coverage of the military history of China. Feel free to list you name [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Chinese military history task force#Participants|here]], and invite your friends too! ;) -- <font color="#FF0000">'''Миборовский'''</font> <sup>[[User:Miborovsky|U]]|[[User talk:Miborovsky|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Miborovsky|C]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Miborovsky|M]]|[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">E</font>]]|[[User:Miborovsky#Wiki-not-so-fun|Chugoku Banzai]]!</sup> 01:22, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

19004 +++$+++ Cognate247 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 19004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.312337580E09 +++$+++ Hey, I noticed that you look like you're in an edit war with an anonymous user at [[Sophie Scholl]]. Maybe it would be better to open it up for discussion on the [[Talk:Sophie Scholl|talk page]]. Just a thought.  +++$+++ Hey, I noticed that you look like you're in an edit war with an anonymous user at [[Sophie Scholl]]. Maybe it would be better to open it up for discussion on the [[Talk:Sophie Scholl|talk page]]. Just a thought. [[User:Cognate247|Cognate247]] ([[User talk:Cognate247|talk]]) 19:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
19005 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ NSH001 +++$+++ 19004 +++$+++ 19004 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.312339320E09 +++$+++ Normally I would, but this IP editor is engaging in obvious vandalism elsewhere, so I don't hold out much hope. In theory, it's possible it could be genuine, but I think this is really vandalism, since, if the IP editor were serious, he or she would have already provided sensible reasons in edit summaries or the talk page. -- +++$+++ :Normally I would, but this IP editor is engaging in obvious vandalism elsewhere, so I don't hold out much hope. In theory, it's possible it could be genuine, but I think this is really vandalism, since, if the IP editor were serious, he or she would have already provided sensible reasons in edit summaries or the talk page. --[[User:NSH001|NSH001]] ([[User talk:NSH001#top|talk]]) 19:42, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

543294 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.180610700E09 +++$+++ Thank you for taking care of my first parole violation block. I had not issued a block before for a prole vio and tried to figure the block length from statements in the AC case-thanks for correcting my mistake. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ Thank you for taking care of my first parole violation block. I had not issued a block before for a prole vio and tried to figure the block length from statements in the AC case-thanks for correcting my mistake. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 04:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
543295 +++$+++ Tariqabjotu +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543294 +++$+++ 543294 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.180611060E09 +++$+++ Ah... I didn't realize you were still online. I saw the break in your contribution history and thought you were off to do something else. Also, I wouldn't really call your block a \"mistake\". -- ''' +++$+++ :Ah... I didn't realize you were still online. I saw the break in your contribution history and thought you were off to do something else. Also, I wouldn't really call your block a "mistake". -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 04:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
543296 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543294 +++$+++ 543295 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.180611120E09 +++$+++ I was actually gone for a while and am just checking my watchlist right now. Thx, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ ::I was actually gone for a while and am just checking my watchlist right now. Thx, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 04:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
543297 +++$+++ Azerbaijani +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543294 +++$+++ 543296 +++$+++ 2007-06-01 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.180737360E09 +++$+++ Hello again. Unfortunatly, Dacy69 has once again broken his parole on the very same article. I have had to report him once again (see the report here: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/3RR#User:Dacy69_reported_by_User:Azerbaijani_.28Result:.29]). What is interesting is that his first edit after coming back from his block was another revert. Since he did not wait the full week from his last revert, this means that he violated his parole again, bringing the total to 4 reverts within a 3 day period. +++$+++ :::Hello again. Unfortunatly, Dacy69 has once again broken his parole on the very same article. I have had to report him once again (see the report here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Dacy69_reported_by_User:Azerbaijani_.28Result:.29]). What is interesting is that his first edit after coming back from his block was another revert. Since he did not wait the full week from his last revert, this means that he violated his parole again, bringing the total to 4 reverts within a 3 day period.[[User:Azerbaijani|Azerbaijani]] 15:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

19009 +++$+++ Robin Patterson +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19009 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-27 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.122525900E09 +++$+++ [[The Thomson Corporation]] - (and that is definitely the name). The short-lived sentence you killed looked like what a bored gossip columnist might have written 30 years ago.  +++$+++ [[The Thomson Corporation]] - (and that is definitely the name). The short-lived sentence you killed looked like what a bored gossip columnist might have written 30 years ago. [[User:Robin Patterson|Robin Patterson]] 21:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
19010 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19009 +++$+++ 19009 +++$+++ 2005-07-27 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.122528060E09 +++$+++ It's quite explicitly ''against'' Wikipedia policy to begin an article title with the word \"The\" if it's not necessary (as in being part of the title of an artistic work or a newspaper, or the like -- eg. ''[[The Handmaid's Tale]]'', ''[[The Globe and Mail]]''.) Per Wikipedia policy, in this case the article properly goes at [[Thomson Corporation]]. See [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite and indefinite articles at beginning of name)]].  +++$+++ * It's quite explicitly ''against'' Wikipedia policy to begin an article title with the word "The" if it's not necessary (as in being part of the title of an artistic work or a newspaper, or the like -- eg. ''[[The Handmaid's Tale]]'', ''[[The Globe and Mail]]''.) Per Wikipedia policy, in this case the article properly goes at [[Thomson Corporation]]. See [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite and indefinite articles at beginning of name)]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 22:21, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

543298 +++$+++ William M. Connolley +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543298 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.180628100E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've butted in on [[An Inconvenient Truth]] and removed the prot and blocked the two warring editors for 3RR\/edit warring. I don't think anyone else was warring over this so would like to let others have their chance to edit. I didn't ask you first, for which my apologies, and you will of course feel free to reverse this if you see fit, especially given that I've been involved with the page before (although not, it would seem, for a while)  +++$+++ Hi, I've butted in on [[An Inconvenient Truth]] and removed the prot and blocked the two warring editors for 3RR/edit warring. I don't think anyone else was warring over this so would like to let others have their chance to edit. I didn't ask you first, for which my apologies, and you will of course feel free to reverse this if you see fit, especially given that I've been involved with the page before (although not, it would seem, for a while) [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 09:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
543299 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543298 +++$+++ 543298 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.181825520E09 +++$+++ No problem. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :No problem. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 05:52, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

571147 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-10 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.163220780E09 +++$+++ Horay! A big fish! Thankyou, Randfan. <small>Now all I need is a big dish...<\/small> Thanks again, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ Horay! A big fish! Thankyou, Randfan. <small>Now all I need is a big dish...</small> Thanks again, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 20:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
571148 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571147 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.163252640E09 +++$+++ Ok, that I'll do. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::Ok, that I'll do. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 05:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
571149 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571147 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-11 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.163253120E09 +++$+++ Done, thanks for the advise, I'll remember it for next time. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::Done, thanks for the advise, I'll remember it for next time. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/Complaints|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 05:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

19012 +++$+++ 129.173.105.28 +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19012 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-29 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.122623160E09 +++$+++ Did you merge [[Royal Dutch Shell]] with [[Royal Dutch\/Shell]]?  -- +++$+++ Did you merge [[Royal Dutch Shell]] with [[Royal Dutch/Shell]]?  --[[User:129.173.105.28|129.173.105.28]] 00:46, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
19013 +++$+++ 129.173.105.28 +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19012 +++$+++ 19012 +++$+++ 2005-07-31 03:31:00 +++$+++ 1.122805860E09 +++$+++ Please read this http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Merging_and_moving_pages#Renaming_.28moving.29 .  Never copy and paste a page to move it.  There is a forum where you can get admins to do complicated moves.  When in doubt seek help.  -- +++$+++ :Please read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Merging_and_moving_pages#Renaming_.28moving.29 .  Never copy and paste a page to move it.  There is a forum where you can get admins to do complicated moves.  When in doubt seek help.  --[[User:129.173.105.28|129.173.105.28]] 03:31, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
19014 +++$+++ stickguy +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19012 +++$+++ 19013 +++$+++ 2005-07-31 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.122809940E09 +++$+++ Thanks, will be more careful in future.  +++$+++ ::Thanks, will be more careful in future. [[User:Stickguy|Stickguy]] 04:39, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

281157 +++$+++ Cool Cat +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-24 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.151142960E09 +++$+++ Why does the other template look better? I modified it to look almost identical. (it has a few optional parameters allowing me to use dvd covers more efficently) --<small> +++$+++ Why does the other template look better? I modified it to look almost identical. (it has a few optional parameters allowing me to use dvd covers more efficently) --<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cat]] [[User talk:Cool Cat|out]]</small> 02:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
281158 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281157 +++$+++ 281157 +++$+++ 2006-06-24 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.151144040E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm not sure how to explain why does the other template look better, it's just an aesthetic thing I guess. Personal preference.  +++$+++ :Hi, I'm not sure how to explain why does the other template look better, it's just an aesthetic thing I guess. Personal preference. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 03:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
281159 +++$+++ Cool Cat +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281157 +++$+++ 281158 +++$+++ 2006-06-24 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.151145780E09 +++$+++ Our taste in tables dont seem to be matching then. Hypoteticaly, would it bug you if my version was used? --<small> +++$+++ ::Our taste in tables dont seem to be matching then. Hypoteticaly, would it bug you if my version was used? --<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cat]] [[User talk:Cool Cat|out]]</small> 03:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
281160 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281157 +++$+++ 281159 +++$+++ 2006-06-24 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.151146140E09 +++$+++ Not at all, if consenus decides that your version gets used.  +++$+++ :::Not at all, if consenus decides that your version gets used. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 03:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
281161 +++$+++ Cool Cat +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281157 +++$+++ 281160 +++$+++ 2006-06-24 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.151147280E09 +++$+++ --<small> +++$+++ ::::--<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cat]] [[User talk:Cool Cat|out]]</small> 04:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
281162 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281157 +++$+++ 281161 +++$+++ 2006-06-24 04:20:00 +++$+++ 1.151148000E09 +++$+++ Er...let me try to put this in a way where it doesn't sound offensive, hopefully. You are not the only person writing the article, and we should all try to respect each other's views when cooperating on an article. That is why we need consensus. Wikiprojects, as you said, cannot dictate what individual editors do, but they provide coordination and consistency for a subject area.... And that is needed for the benefit of the readers, as the readers are, ultimately, who Wikipedia serves.  +++$+++ :::::Er...let me try to put this in a way where it doesn't sound offensive, hopefully. You are not the only person writing the article, and we should all try to respect each other's views when cooperating on an article. That is why we need consensus. Wikiprojects, as you said, cannot dictate what individual editors do, but they provide coordination and consistency for a subject area.... And that is needed for the benefit of the readers, as the readers are, ultimately, who Wikipedia serves. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 04:20, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
281163 +++$+++ Cool Cat +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281157 +++$+++ 281162 +++$+++ 2006-06-24 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.151171460E09 +++$+++ --<small> +++$+++ ::::::--<small>[[User:Cool Cat|Cat]] [[User talk:Cool Cat|out]]</small> 10:51, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

543303 +++$+++ Good friend100 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543303 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-03 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.180902300E09 +++$+++ Does this article need to have the unreferenced tag on every single section? It makes the article look bad and I think we only need one at the very top. However, other editors are reverting this and they are POV pushing.  +++$+++ Does this article need to have the unreferenced tag on every single section? It makes the article look bad and I think we only need one at the very top. However, other editors are reverting this and they are POV pushing. [[User:Good friend100|Good friend100]] 13:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
543304 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543303 +++$+++ 543303 +++$+++ 2007-06-03 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.180910820E09 +++$+++ You're right, you only need one tag at the top of the article-I'll take a look at the article's history tomorrow. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :You're right, you only need one tag at the top of the article-I'll take a look at the article's history tomorrow. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 15:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

19016 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-15 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.134700140E09 +++$+++ FWIW, Wikipedia ''doesn't'' actually have a policy that the official name of something always trumps considerations such as common name or consistency of naming format within like categories; in fact, Wikipedia policy quite specifically ''subordinates'' official name to other considerations when there's a conflict. So, in reality, situations like this bring up some complex decision-making about how best to handle the specific circumstances -- \"what the CRTC uses is automatically Wikipedia's title, case closed, no exceptions\" simply isn't how Wikipedia works. The CRTC, for example, will never have to render a decision concerning the [[Chicago Board of Trade]], so it doesn't need to disambiguate [[CBOT (TV)|CBOT]] from anything. But we do, whether the CRTC uses a suffix in that instance or not. And I personally wouldn't be comfortable leaving most CBC stations at undisambiguated titles unless somebody can prove that nothing else in the world actually uses acronyms like [[CBAT]], [[CBLT]] or [[CBST]]. I think it's better to prepare for that eventuality now, rather than set up potentially problematic situations in the future. But YMMV, I suppose.  +++$+++ FWIW, Wikipedia ''doesn't'' actually have a policy that the official name of something always trumps considerations such as common name or consistency of naming format within like categories; in fact, Wikipedia policy quite specifically ''subordinates'' official name to other considerations when there's a conflict. So, in reality, situations like this bring up some complex decision-making about how best to handle the specific circumstances -- "what the CRTC uses is automatically Wikipedia's title, case closed, no exceptions" simply isn't how Wikipedia works. The CRTC, for example, will never have to render a decision concerning the [[Chicago Board of Trade]], so it doesn't need to disambiguate [[CBOT (TV)|CBOT]] from anything. But we do, whether the CRTC uses a suffix in that instance or not. And I personally wouldn't be comfortable leaving most CBC stations at undisambiguated titles unless somebody can prove that nothing else in the world actually uses acronyms like [[CBAT]], [[CBLT]] or [[CBST]]. I think it's better to prepare for that eventuality now, rather than set up potentially problematic situations in the future. But YMMV, I suppose. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 18:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
19017 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19016 +++$+++ 19016 +++$+++ 2005-12-15 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.134713400E09 +++$+++ So, in reality, I'm just trying to avoid such a situation happening again. I'm probably just being unnecessarily cautious, I admit. I'm open to using a different format for the CBC stations that don't actually use the -TV suffix, but basically I'm just trying to make things as clear and straightforward and not-overly-confusing as possible.  +++$+++ : So, in reality, I'm just trying to avoid such a situation happening again. I'm probably just being unnecessarily cautious, I admit. I'm open to using a different format for the CBC stations that don't actually use the -TV suffix, but basically I'm just trying to make things as clear and straightforward and not-overly-confusing as possible. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 22:10, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

543310 +++$+++ Kingjeff +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.181036640E09 +++$+++ Don't worry. Problem's been solved.  +++$+++ Don't worry. Problem's been solved. [[User:Kingjeff|Kingjeff]] 02:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
543311 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543310 +++$+++ 543310 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.181038740E09 +++$+++ OK-glag to see the issue has been resolved. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :OK-glag to see the issue has been resolved. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 03:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

281168 +++$+++ Kylu +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.153306980E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid #FF0099;\" | To the people who have supported my request: I appreciate the show of confidence in me and I hope I live up to your expectations!<br \/>To the people who opposed the request: I'm certainly not ignoring the constructive criticism and advice you've offered. I thank you as well!<br \/><b><font color=\"#FF0099\">\u2665! <b><i><font color=\"#FF00FF\">~Kylu ( +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid #FF0099;" | To the people who have supported my request: I appreciate the show of confidence in me and I hope I live up to your expectations!<br />To the people who opposed the request: I'm certainly not ignoring the constructive criticism and advice you've offered. I thank you as well!<br /><b><font color="#FF0099">♥! <b><i><font color="#FF00FF">~Kylu ([[User:Kylu|u]]|[[User talk:Kylu|t]]) </font></i></b> 04:03, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
281169 +++$+++ Kylu +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281168 +++$+++ 281168 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.153306980E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for the support. :) <b><i><font color=\"#FF00FF\">~Kylu ( +++$+++ :Thanks again for the support. :) <b><i><font color="#FF00FF">~Kylu ([[User:Kylu|u]]|[[User talk:Kylu|t]]) </font></i></b> 04:03, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

281170 +++$+++ Buchanan-Hermit +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-29 08:55:00 +++$+++ 1.154188500E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure how appropriate that template is for North Delta, as it is not a municipality in itself but rather an area within a municipality (in this case, Delta). -\u2192 +++$+++ I'm not sure how appropriate that template is for North Delta, as it is not a municipality in itself but rather an area within a municipality (in this case, Delta). -→[[User:Buchanan-Hermit|<font color="blue">Buchanan-Hermit</font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="darkgreen">™</font>]]/[[User talk:Buchanan-Hermit|<font color="red" size="1">?!</font>]] 08:55, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
281171 +++$+++ Buchanan-Hermit +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281170 +++$+++ 281170 +++$+++ 2006-07-29 09:01:00 +++$+++ 1.154188860E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm not sure how appropriate it'd be for Tsawwassen either. -\u2192 +++$+++ :Yeah, I'm not sure how appropriate it'd be for Tsawwassen either. -→[[User:Buchanan-Hermit|<font color="blue">Buchanan-Hermit</font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="darkgreen">™</font>]]/[[User talk:Buchanan-Hermit|<font color="red" size="1">?!</font>]] 09:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

19027 +++$+++ Skeezix1000 +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-28 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.162092540E09 +++$+++ You have edited this article in this past.   [[User:Decimal10|Decimal10]] is causing problems over at this article again (both through his account and his IP address).  If you have time, I was wondering if you would help me keep an eye on the article.  For more background, take a look at the lengthy message I have left on his talk page, which details all of his inapprorpiate behaviour ([[User talk:Decimal10#Your vandalism of Tim Hortons]]), a message he may erase (or just as likely ignore).  Additional details are on Bearcat's talk page, relating to one particular issue ([[User talk:Bearcat#Tim Hortons]]).  I'm just getting tired of dealing with him (he called me a \"nutcase\" this morning in an edit summary), and I could use a hand from some experienced editors familiar with the article (not to mention some third party input, just in case I am losing perspective).  Thanks.  +++$+++ You have edited this article in this past.   [[User:Decimal10|Decimal10]] is causing problems over at this article again (both through his account and his IP address).  If you have time, I was wondering if you would help me keep an eye on the article.  For more background, take a look at the lengthy message I have left on his talk page, which details all of his inapprorpiate behaviour ([[User talk:Decimal10#Your vandalism of Tim Hortons]]), a message he may erase (or just as likely ignore).  Additional details are on Bearcat's talk page, relating to one particular issue ([[User talk:Bearcat#Tim Hortons]]).  I'm just getting tired of dealing with him (he called me a "nutcase" this morning in an edit summary), and I could use a hand from some experienced editors familiar with the article (not to mention some third party input, just in case I am losing perspective).  Thanks. [[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] 20:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
19028 +++$+++ Skeezix1000 +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19027 +++$+++ 19027 +++$+++ 2006-10-29 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.162108320E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  That's great.  It is always helpful to have third parties get involved.   +++$+++ :Thanks.  That's great.  It is always helpful to have third parties get involved.  [[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] 00:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

19029 +++$+++ stickguy +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19029 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.163397780E09 +++$+++ It's a common mistake, but the distinction is important. Happy editing! &mdash; <span style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid #0000aa;\"><font face=\"Arial\" style=\"background: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" color=\"#000000\"> +++$+++ It's a common mistake, but the distinction is important. Happy editing! &mdash; <span style="border-bottom: 1px solid #0000aa;"><font face="Arial" style="background: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" color="#000000">[[user:stickguy|stickguy (:^›)&mdash;]]</font></span> || [[user talk:stickguy|talk]] || 22:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
19030 +++$+++ Mets501 +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19029 +++$+++ 19029 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.163400420E09 +++$+++ Hi Stickguy, thanks for the message.  You should probably contact [[User:Taestell|Taestell]] about this; I'm really just carrying out his orders as I'm an administrator and can move pages over other pages. I'll review the moves that I've performed now :-) \u2014<span style=\"font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;\"> +++$+++ :Hi Stickguy, thanks for the message.  You should probably contact [[User:Taestell|Taestell]] about this; I'm really just carrying out his orders as I'm an administrator and can move pages over other pages. I'll review the moves that I've performed now :-) —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">[[User:Mets501|Mets501]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 22:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

543318 +++$+++ DCGeist +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-06 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.181169780E09 +++$+++ Best, Dan\u2014 +++$+++ Best, Dan—[[User:DCGeist|DCGeist]] 15:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
543319 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543318 +++$+++ 543318 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.181185320E09 +++$+++ I have left a comment in support of social science sections together on the talk page and will add a mention of race and gender to the culture secton. I will also see how I can fit in regional identity). Thanks for the ideas and great work you have put into the article. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I have left a comment in support of social science sections together on the talk page and will add a mention of race and gender to the culture secton. I will also see how I can fit in regional identity). Thanks for the ideas and great work you have put into the article. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 20:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

543320 +++$+++ MrZaius +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-10 07:05:00 +++$+++ 1.181484300E09 +++$+++ I've been debating whether or not to bother seeking adminship, and it occurred to me that I ought to just ask an admin if it was worth bothering with: Are the tools worth seeking? Aside from yourself, I've only seen a handful of admins that actively involve themselves in the mainspace pages that I watch. I find myself wondering whether the tools would become more of a distraction than a help. What do you think? Get much out of the time spent exercising your admin rights?  +++$+++ I've been debating whether or not to bother seeking adminship, and it occurred to me that I ought to just ask an admin if it was worth bothering with: Are the tools worth seeking? Aside from yourself, I've only seen a handful of admins that actively involve themselves in the mainspace pages that I watch. I find myself wondering whether the tools would become more of a distraction than a help. What do you think? Get much out of the time spent exercising your admin rights? [[User:MrZaius|<font color="Blue">'''MrZaius'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:MrZaius|'''<font color="Blue">talk</font>''']]</sup> 07:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
543321 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543320 +++$+++ 543320 +++$+++ 2007-06-12 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.181702220E09 +++$+++ Yes they're worth it but, I'll answer your question in a bit more detail once I return to editing this afternoon (pacific time). Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Yes they're worth it but, I'll answer your question in a bit more detail once I return to editing this afternoon (pacific time). Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 19:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
543322 +++$+++ MrZaius +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543320 +++$+++ 543321 +++$+++ 2007-06-27 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.182985440E09 +++$+++ Just ran into a protected template that I was hopin' to edit. Aside from basic things like that, what's the pitch? Are they likely to lure a man away from Main namespace entirely, or just something you deal with occasionally?  +++$+++ ::Just ran into a protected template that I was hopin' to edit. Aside from basic things like that, what's the pitch? Are they likely to lure a man away from Main namespace entirely, or just something you deal with occasionally? [[User:MrZaius|<font color="Blue">'''MrZaius'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:MrZaius|'''<font color="Blue">talk</font>''']]</sup> 16:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
543323 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543320 +++$+++ 543322 +++$+++ 2007-06-27 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.182992460E09 +++$+++ Well, I don't think the tools \"lure a man away from Main\" space - for me the tools have offered a chance to help out wiki on occassion by cutting down on disruptive behavior. So I guess you could say for me they are \"just something you deal with occasionally\" - though the choice is yours. There isn't a minimum amount of time you have to spend doing administrative tasks, the tools simply enhance the ways in which you can help Wiki. I commonly used the tools in between my mainspace edits: edit an article, leave a post on a talk page, check the noticeboard, protect a page, edit an article... and so forth. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :::Well, I don't think the tools "lure a man away from Main" space - for me the tools have offered a chance to help out wiki on occassion by cutting down on disruptive behavior. So I guess you could say for me they are "just something you deal with occasionally" - though the choice is yours. There isn't a minimum amount of time you have to spend doing administrative tasks, the tools simply enhance the ways in which you can help Wiki. I commonly used the tools in between my mainspace edits: edit an article, leave a post on a talk page, check the noticeboard, protect a page, edit an article... and so forth. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 18:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

281178 +++$+++ Nlu +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281178 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-30 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.156940640E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your contributions to Chinese history-related articles, you are awarded the Barnstar of National Merit.  -- +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your contributions to Chinese history-related articles, you are awarded the Barnstar of National Merit.  --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 05:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
281179 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281178 +++$+++ 281178 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.156943460E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I'm still scratching my head as to what I really did to deserve this though. :D  +++$+++ :Thanks! I'm still scratching my head as to what I really did to deserve this though. :D [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 06:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

177935 +++$+++ Youngamerican +++$+++ Reinhardheydt +++$+++ 177935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-23 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.248381000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the interwikilinks!  +++$+++ Thanks for the interwikilinks! [[User:Youngamerican| ''<font color="#CC5500">young</font>''<font color="#321414">american</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Youngamerican|wtf?]])</small> 13:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
177936 +++$+++ Reinhardheydt +++$+++ Reinhardheydt +++$+++ 177935 +++$+++ 177935 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.248381900E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. -- +++$+++ :You are welcome. --[[User:Reinhardheydt|Reinhardheydt]] ([[User talk:Reinhardheydt#top|talk]]) 13:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

543324 +++$+++ MrZaius +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-28 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.183015260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the feedback - Sounds like something I might be interested in eventually, then.  +++$+++ Thanks for the feedback - Sounds like something I might be interested in eventually, then. [[User:MrZaius|<font color="Blue">'''MrZaius'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:MrZaius|'''<font color="Blue">talk</font>''']]</sup> 00:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
543325 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543324 +++$+++ 543324 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.183017060E09 +++$+++ Glad to hear that - I'd support your RfA! Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Glad to hear that - I'd support your RfA! Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

281181 +++$+++ Mrdini +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-08 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.157776440E09 +++$+++ Source for this line?  +++$+++ Source for this line? [[User:Mrdini|Mrdini]] 21:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
281182 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281181 +++$+++ 281181 +++$+++ 2006-09-08 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.157782680E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I just took the line from the [[Naoki Urasawa]] article. I'll try to find a source for that when I have the time.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I just took the line from the [[Naoki Urasawa]] article. I'll try to find a source for that when I have the time. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 23:18, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
281183 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281181 +++$+++ 281182 +++$+++ 2006-09-08 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.157784300E09 +++$+++ Found it.  +++$+++ ::Found it. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 23:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
281184 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281181 +++$+++ 281181 +++$+++ 2006-10-18 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.161168480E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.yifan.net\/yihe\/novels\/history\/songshiytt\/sshi365.html Here you go]. I have to admit that I found it through google though, and I don't know much about Song history.... I only translated the Battle of Yamen article from the Chinese Wikipedia page and added the History of Song reference as required. I wouldn't rely on machine translations though, the historical text is written in [[Classical Chinese]], and seeing that machine translators don't do a good job at even deciphering modern Chinese..... Anyways, the article seems well done.  +++$+++ :[http://www.yifan.net/yihe/novels/history/songshiytt/sshi365.html Here you go]. I have to admit that I found it through google though, and I don't know much about Song history.... I only translated the Battle of Yamen article from the Chinese Wikipedia page and added the History of Song reference as required. I wouldn't rely on machine translations though, the historical text is written in [[Classical Chinese]], and seeing that machine translators don't do a good job at even deciphering modern Chinese..... Anyways, the article seems well done. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 03:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

543326 +++$+++ JHP +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-12 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.181712720E09 +++$+++ There's a New York Times article you may be interested in. It is titled ''The Class-Consciousness Raiser''. It is located [http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/06\/10\/magazine\/10payne-t.html here]. -- +++$+++ There's a New York Times article you may be interested in. It is titled ''The Class-Consciousness Raiser''. It is located [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/10/magazine/10payne-t.html here]. --[[User:JHP|JHP]] 22:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
543327 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543326 +++$+++ 543326 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.181720940E09 +++$+++ Great article - I just read it, very interesting. Thanks. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Great article - I just read it, very interesting. Thanks. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

19040 +++$+++ MapleLeafFan04 +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-12 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.181678880E09 +++$+++ After the recent ruling where CTV was forced to sell the five Citytv stations (to Rogers), there's another problem I think few are aware of... If CTV is allowed to keep the A-Channel station in Ottawa, they would own two stations there, as they already own CJOH. What do you think about that?  +++$+++ After the recent ruling where CTV was forced to sell the five Citytv stations (to Rogers), there's another problem I think few are aware of... If CTV is allowed to keep the A-Channel station in Ottawa, they would own two stations there, as they already own CJOH. What do you think about that? [[User:MapleLeafFan04|Maple Leaf fan &#39;04]] 13:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
19041 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19040 +++$+++ 19040 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.181722440E09 +++$+++ Gonna be interesting, that's all I have to say...  +++$+++ : Gonna be interesting, that's all I have to say... [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] 01:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

281185 +++$+++ Zaku Two +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281185 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-23 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.161672780E09 +++$+++ There is no doubt in my mind about any of these unless otherwise noted. All of the Osean, Yuke, ISAF, and Belkan ground hardware is correct.  I'm sure about everything in Erusea, with the exception of the mobile AA and mobile SAMs.  If someone finds something more accurate that what I think they are, allow it to be changed.  +++$+++ There is no doubt in my mind about any of these unless otherwise noted. All of the Osean, Yuke, ISAF, and Belkan ground hardware is correct.  I'm sure about everything in Erusea, with the exception of the mobile AA and mobile SAMs.  If someone finds something more accurate that what I think they are, allow it to be changed. [[User:Zaku Two|Zaku Two]] 23:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
281186 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281185 +++$+++ 281185 +++$+++ 2006-10-24 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.161678000E09 +++$+++ I'll be on the look out, but I don't think I can make any decisions as to which hardware is more accurate and what not, I don't tend to pay attention to those things.  +++$+++ :I'll be on the look out, but I don't think I can make any decisions as to which hardware is more accurate and what not, I don't tend to pay attention to those things. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 01:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

546561 +++$+++ Sicaspi +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-19 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.227160320E09 +++$+++ I will do my best to write it in mt own word , but I have lack of time. But dr.razavi is a great auther in the world.  +++$+++ I will do my best to write it in mt own word , but I have lack of time. But dr.razavi is a great auther in the world. [[User:Sicaspi|Sicaspi]] ([[User talk:Sicaspi|talk]]) 21:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
546562 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546561 +++$+++ 546561 +++$+++ 2008-11-19 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.227160560E09 +++$+++ That's fine, but try to get to it within the next day or so. Copyright problems can cause immediate deletion. As far as the notability of Razavi is concerned, I think that is well-established by the awards - so there are no problems there. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :That's fine, but try to get to it within the next day or so. Copyright problems can cause immediate deletion. As far as the notability of Razavi is concerned, I think that is well-established by the awards - so there are no problems there. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 21:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
546563 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546561 +++$+++ 546562 +++$+++ 2008-11-21 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.227300480E09 +++$+++ Because copyright violation is a serious issue, I went ahead and corrected the article rather than wait. There is no problem with it now. There is one ''citation needed tag'' on the article for the sentence about being a top author for ISSCC - I wasn't able to find a source for that. It would be great if you could find a reference and add it in. Cheers. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::Because copyright violation is a serious issue, I went ahead and corrected the article rather than wait. There is no problem with it now. There is one ''citation needed tag'' on the article for the sentence about being a top author for ISSCC - I wasn't able to find a source for that. It would be great if you could find a reference and add it in. Cheers. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 12:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

543331 +++$+++ Shahram9 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-14 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.181859660E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially American related subjects.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially American related subjects. [[User:Shahram9|Shahram9]] 15:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
543332 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543331 +++$+++ 543331 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.181868720E09 +++$+++ Thanks! <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Thanks! <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 17:52, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
543333 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543331 +++$+++ 543331 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.181958240E09 +++$+++ I see. Well, I can't just block Lear as this isn't a clear-cut case of vandalism (though I do he did get awfully close to a 3RR vio). I have opened the issue for discussion on the talk page. As an admin I only want to use blocks as a last resort, so let's see if a compromise can be found on the talk page. Thanks for not engaging in an edit war. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I see. Well, I can't just block Lear as this isn't a clear-cut case of vandalism (though I do he did get awfully close to a 3RR vio). I have opened the issue for discussion on the talk page. As an admin I only want to use blocks as a last resort, so let's see if a compromise can be found on the talk page. Thanks for not engaging in an edit war. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 18:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
543334 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543331 +++$+++ 543331 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.181966400E09 +++$+++ Ok, I have raised the issue on [[Talk:Germany]]. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Ok, I have raised the issue on [[Talk:Germany]]. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 21:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

281193 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-23 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.164277500E09 +++$+++ Do note I'm not contesting your claims, I'm concerned about the tone. Not even the Hitler articles would get the adjectives Cao Cao is getting here in this article. Holding the emperor hostage would mean \"I've got the emperor! Don't move or I'll put a hole in his head!\" or something like that. About  names....let's use a Western example: In an encyclopedia, would you use \"George\" to call Bush? Of course you're allowed to, but it's unconventional.  +++$+++ Do note I'm not contesting your claims, I'm concerned about the tone. Not even the Hitler articles would get the adjectives Cao Cao is getting here in this article. Holding the emperor hostage would mean "I've got the emperor! Don't move or I'll put a hole in his head!" or something like that. About  names....let's use a Western example: In an encyclopedia, would you use "George" to call Bush? Of course you're allowed to, but it's unconventional. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 02:25, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
281194 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281193 +++$+++ 281193 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.164297120E09 +++$+++ A hostage is a person who is being used as a shield by another person to help them acheive what it is they wish to gain or access.  You're using the more modern terminology, such as robbery hostages and the like.  It wouldn't be factual to claim that he had been kidnapped, because he wasn't.  There is no other way to put it.  I also forgot to mention earlier that Cheng was certainly a loyalist, as he was the only person Xian entrusted to carry out the assassination of Cao Cao.  The Emperor gave Cheng a robe as a gift, inside the girdle was a request that Cheng rally loyalist forces and eliminate Cao Cao.  It would be safe to say that Cheng was a stalwart loyalist.  +++$+++ :A hostage is a person who is being used as a shield by another person to help them acheive what it is they wish to gain or access.  You're using the more modern terminology, such as robbery hostages and the like.  It wouldn't be factual to claim that he had been kidnapped, because he wasn't.  There is no other way to put it.  I also forgot to mention earlier that Cheng was certainly a loyalist, as he was the only person Xian entrusted to carry out the assassination of Cao Cao.  The Emperor gave Cheng a robe as a gift, inside the girdle was a request that Cheng rally loyalist forces and eliminate Cao Cao.  It would be safe to say that Cheng was a stalwart loyalist. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 07:52, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

281195 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281195 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-23 08:35:00 +++$+++ 1.164299700E09 +++$+++ I would prefer the term \"puppet\" to \"hostage\" though. As much as I depise the man, I would still have to write \"Bush\" instead of \"George\" or \"Dubya you sad little prick\" because this is an encyclopedia =D  +++$+++ I would prefer the term "puppet" to "hostage" though. As much as I depise the man, I would still have to write "Bush" instead of "George" or "Dubya you sad little prick" because this is an encyclopedia =D [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 08:35, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
281196 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281195 +++$+++ 281195 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.164299940E09 +++$+++ Very well, I'll change it to puppet.  Anything else bothering you?  +++$+++ :Very well, I'll change it to puppet.  Anything else bothering you? [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 08:39, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

594209 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Bob rulz +++$+++ 594209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-04 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.236211680E09 +++$+++ --<small><span style=\"border: 1px solid\"> +++$+++ --<small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#003333"> &nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="background-color:#003333; color:White">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 16:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
594210 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Bob rulz +++$+++ 594209 +++$+++ 594209 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.236332160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the input; if you can help us out with any of it, that would be great. --<small><span style=\"border: 1px solid\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for the input; if you can help us out with any of it, that would be great. --<small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#003333"> &nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="background-color:#003333; color:White">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 01:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

281198 +++$+++ OwenX +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-26 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.164537420E09 +++$+++ Please don't use cut-and-paste to carry out page moves or renames. Review [[WP:MOVE]] for details. Thank you.  +++$+++ Please don't use cut-and-paste to carry out page moves or renames. Review [[WP:MOVE]] for details. Thank you. [[User:OwenX|Owen&times;]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>&#9742;</big>]] 02:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
281199 +++$+++ OwenX +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281198 +++$+++ 281198 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.164537780E09 +++$+++ I was referring to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=The_Great_Wall_of_China&diff=prev&oldid=90140013 this edit], where, I assume, you misunderstood the article to be a redirect, and removed the only valid copy of it.  +++$+++ :I was referring to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Great_Wall_of_China&diff=prev&oldid=90140013 this edit], where, I assume, you misunderstood the article to be a redirect, and removed the only valid copy of it. [[User:OwenX|Owen&times;]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>&#9742;</big>]] 02:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
281200 +++$+++ OwenX +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281198 +++$+++ 281199 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.164538320E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ ::Done. [[User:OwenX|Owen&times;]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>&#9742;</big>]] 02:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

568022 +++$+++ Scott5114 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568022 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-15 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.205591340E09 +++$+++ Hello, and thanks for your support in my recent RFA! The final result was '''61\/0\/3''', so I've been issued the mop! I'm extremely grateful for your confidence in me and will strive to live up to it. Thanks again! \u2014 +++$+++ Hello, and thanks for your support in my recent RFA! The final result was '''61/0/3''', so I've been issued the mop! I'm extremely grateful for your confidence in me and will strive to live up to it. Thanks again! —[[User:Scott5114|Scott5114]][[User_talk:Scott5114|↗]] <span style="font-size:75%">[[Special:Contributions/Scott5114|[EXACT CHANGE ONLY]]]</span> 07:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
568023 +++$+++ Seraphim Whipp +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568022 +++$+++ 568022 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.205710320E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Seraphim Whipp|<font color="FF69B4">Seraphim&hearts;</font>]]  [[User_talk:Seraphim Whipp|<sup><font color="black">Whipp</font></sup>]] 16:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

281201 +++$+++ Raasnoerd +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-28 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.164752280E09 +++$+++ Stop vandalising my userpage, or I will block you from editing. -- +++$+++ Stop vandalising my userpage, or I will block you from editing. --[[User:Raasnoerd|Raasnoerd]] 14:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
281202 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281201 +++$+++ 281201 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.164752340E09 +++$+++ LOL WHAT.  +++$+++ :LOL WHAT. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 14:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

543347 +++$+++ Eliko +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-08 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.183953840E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Eliko|Eliko]] 21:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
543348 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543347 +++$+++ 543347 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.183966500E09 +++$+++ I did. Thanks, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I did. Thanks, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

543349 +++$+++ Until(1 == 2) +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543349 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-06 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.183712340E09 +++$+++ Please read the talk page at [[Talk:List_of_ethnic_slurs_by_ethnicity#WP:V]], there needs to be citations for entries on this page. Please do not just re-add entries without finding a citation. Thank you very much for finding the citations on the ones you did.  +++$+++ Please read the talk page at [[Talk:List_of_ethnic_slurs_by_ethnicity#WP:V]], there needs to be citations for entries on this page. Please do not just re-add entries without finding a citation. Thank you very much for finding the citations on the ones you did. [[User:Until(1 == 2)|Until(1 == 2)]] 01:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
543350 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543349 +++$+++ 543349 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.183715580E09 +++$+++ OK, I'll try and find some but to be honest this is low, low on my priority list. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :OK, I'll try and find some but to be honest this is low, low on my priority list. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 02:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

543352 +++$+++ I +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543352 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-12 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.184261700E09 +++$+++ Hey, I noticed you were a prominant contributer to the United States article, and so I figured you would be a good person to ask. I notice that whenever I click on anything for the United States article, it is ''enormously'' slow, even if my internet is fine. I even get edit conflicts when using rollback with TW. The only thing I can think of is the size of the article, or the constant traffic might be making it difficult to get to. I was wondering if you ever had this problem, and if so you knew how to fix it. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, or why it happens, feel free to disregard this :)  +++$+++ Hey, I noticed you were a prominant contributer to the United States article, and so I figured you would be a good person to ask. I notice that whenever I click on anything for the United States article, it is ''enormously'' slow, even if my internet is fine. I even get edit conflicts when using rollback with TW. The only thing I can think of is the size of the article, or the constant traffic might be making it difficult to get to. I was wondering if you ever had this problem, and if so you knew how to fix it. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, or why it happens, feel free to disregard this :) [[User:I|<font face="vivaldi"><big>I</big></font>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;<font face="Times New Roman"><sup>[[User talk:I|<font color="000033">(said)</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/I|<font color="000033">(did)</font>]]</sup></font> 10:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
543353 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543352 +++$+++ 543352 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.184312760E09 +++$+++ I think it is the length of the article combined with high levels of traffic. I also have a broadband high speed conection and sometimes it takes a while to load. Unfortunately my area of expertise is the social sciences so I don't know of any way to fix it. If you do find a way to make the page load quiker, let me know! <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I think it is the length of the article combined with high levels of traffic. I also have a broadband high speed conection and sometimes it takes a while to load. Unfortunately my area of expertise is the social sciences so I don't know of any way to fix it. If you do find a way to make the page load quiker, let me know! <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
543354 +++$+++ I +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543352 +++$+++ 543353 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.184325540E09 +++$+++ So you too have difficulties loading the page? Well thats good. Well, not really, but at least I know I'm not crazy. I'll ask Mrzaius, since he is one of the other main contriubters.  +++$+++ ::So you too have difficulties loading the page? Well thats good. Well, not really, but at least I know I'm not crazy. I'll ask Mrzaius, since he is one of the other main contriubters. [[User:I|<font face="vivaldi"><big>I</big></font>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;<font face="Times New Roman"><sup>[[User talk:I|<font color="000033">(said)</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/I|<font color="000033">(did)</font>]]</sup></font> 04:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

281210 +++$+++ SeizureDog +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281210 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-11 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.168585020E09 +++$+++ Unless I am very much mistaken, yes it did. See [http:\/\/ja.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/\u3072\u3050\u3089\u3057\u306e\u306a\u304f\u9803\u306b_\u9b3c\u96a0\u3057\u7de8 \u3072\u3050\u3089\u3057\u306e\u306a\u304f\u9803\u306b \u9b3c\u96a0\u3057\u7de8]. Genre listed is \"sound novel\".-- +++$+++ Unless I am very much mistaken, yes it did. See [http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ひぐらしのなく頃に_鬼隠し編 ひぐらしのなく頃に 鬼隠し編]. Genre listed is "sound novel".--[[User:SeizureDog|SeizureDog]] 22:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
281211 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281210 +++$+++ 281210 +++$+++ 2007-01-11 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.168585440E09 +++$+++ Ah shoot, I got sound novels confused with something else. Yes, you're very right.  +++$+++ :Ah shoot, I got sound novels confused with something else. Yes, you're very right. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 23:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
281212 +++$+++ SeizureDog +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281210 +++$+++ 281211 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.168601160E09 +++$+++ No worries.-- +++$+++ ::No worries.--[[User:SeizureDog|SeizureDog]] 03:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

90559 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-11 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.215822900E09 +++$+++ Let me ask you; if you were threatened over and over and over and attacked in 7 administrative actions for your RfA voting, would you feel welcome to continue voting in RfAs? I doubt it, frankly. And I repeat my invitation to you to file an RfC against me for not voting in RfAs. Since some are FURIOUS that I ever voted in RfAs, or at least voted the \"wrong way\", why not attack me for NOT voting in RfAs and see how it goes? I would welcome the chance to bring this ridiculous inconsistency to the surface. Do it.--[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] |  +++$+++ Let me ask you; if you were threatened over and over and over and attacked in 7 administrative actions for your RfA voting, would you feel welcome to continue voting in RfAs? I doubt it, frankly. And I repeat my invitation to you to file an RfC against me for not voting in RfAs. Since some are FURIOUS that I ever voted in RfAs, or at least voted the "wrong way", why not attack me for NOT voting in RfAs and see how it goes? I would welcome the chance to bring this ridiculous inconsistency to the surface. Do it.--[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] | [[User:Filll/WP Challenge|<font color="Green"><small>wpc</small></font>]]) 17:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
90560 +++$+++ Xenocidic +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90559 +++$+++ 90559 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.215823080E09 +++$+++ If I decided to stop voting in RFAs, I would also stop asking questions in RFAs. And I'm not trying to compel you to vote in RFAs, so I'm not going to open an RFC, I'm just suggesting that if you have no intention whatsoever of voting, then you shouldn't be adding questions out of fairness to the candidate. \u2013<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :If I decided to stop voting in RFAs, I would also stop asking questions in RFAs. And I'm not trying to compel you to vote in RFAs, so I'm not going to open an RFC, I'm just suggesting that if you have no intention whatsoever of voting, then you shouldn't be adding questions out of fairness to the candidate. –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font><font color="#DCDCDC">cidic</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 17:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
90561 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90559 +++$+++ 90560 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.215823980E09 +++$+++ These issues, and many others, would be addressed if we had a different kind of attitude among admins. And most admins have zero exposure to the areas that are contentious on Wikipedia that they will have to rule on later. So therefore, my participation is my effort to try to shape things in a tiny way. I am not allowed to do this? Without voting, which I have been attacked for, over and over? --[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] |  +++$+++ ::These issues, and many others, would be addressed if we had a different kind of attitude among admins. And most admins have zero exposure to the areas that are contentious on Wikipedia that they will have to rule on later. So therefore, my participation is my effort to try to shape things in a tiny way. I am not allowed to do this? Without voting, which I have been attacked for, over and over? --[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] | [[User:Filll/WP Challenge|<font color="Green"><small>wpc</small></font>]]) 17:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
90562 +++$+++ Xenocidic +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90559 +++$+++ 90561 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.215824220E09 +++$+++ Fair enough. You might consider adding a short note with your questions that your current policy is not to vote in RFAs, so that the candidate is not put off when they put the time into answering your questions (which can take quite a long time) and you don't even comment. \u2013<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::Fair enough. You might consider adding a short note with your questions that your current policy is not to vote in RFAs, so that the candidate is not put off when they put the time into answering your questions (which can take quite a long time) and you don't even comment. –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font><font color="#DCDCDC">cidic</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 17:57, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
90563 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90559 +++$+++ 90562 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.215824520E09 +++$+++ I have made it a policy not to comment about most responses to WP Challenge exercises in an attempt to avoid offending anyone. Given that I have had so many bad experiences with people so angry at me they would like to have me banned or outed or worse for what I have posted, I am reluctant to upset people any more than I have to. People get so incredibly furious about just nothing here. I would rather not have that directed at me, as much as possible. Thanks.--[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] |  +++$+++ ::::I have made it a policy not to comment about most responses to WP Challenge exercises in an attempt to avoid offending anyone. Given that I have had so many bad experiences with people so angry at me they would like to have me banned or outed or worse for what I have posted, I am reluctant to upset people any more than I have to. People get so incredibly furious about just nothing here. I would rather not have that directed at me, as much as possible. Thanks.--[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] | [[User:Filll/WP Challenge|<font color="Green"><small>wpc</small></font>]]) 18:02, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
90564 +++$+++ Xenocidic +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90559 +++$+++ 90563 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.215824760E09 +++$+++ If you're not going to vote a simple \"Thank you for answering\" would suffice. \u2013<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::::If you're not going to vote a simple "Thank you for answering" would suffice. –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font><font color="#DCDCDC">cidic</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 18:06, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
90565 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90559 +++$+++ 90564 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.215825120E09 +++$+++ I have thanked several, and I would be happy to thank others for responding.--[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] |  +++$+++ ::::::I have thanked several, and I would be happy to thank others for responding.--[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] | [[User:Filll/WP Challenge|<font color="Green"><small>wpc</small></font>]]) 18:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
90566 +++$+++ Xenocidic +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90559 +++$+++ 90565 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.215825240E09 +++$+++ Alright. Again, thanks for your time. \u2013<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::::::Alright. Again, thanks for your time. –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font><font color="#DCDCDC">cidic</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 18:14, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
90567 +++$+++ SQL +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90559 +++$+++ 90566 +++$+++ 2008-07-13 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.215956760E09 +++$+++ (Related) You've got mail.  +++$+++ ::::::::(Related) You've got mail. [[User:SQL|<span style="font-size:7pt;color: #fff;background:#900;border:2px solid #999">SQL</span>]][[User talk:SQL|<sup style="font-size: 5pt;color:#999">Query me!</sup>]] 06:46, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

543356 +++$+++ Georgewilliamherbert +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-17 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.184734860E09 +++$+++ unless they escalate the threats, we need to give them somewhere to appeal the block if they decide to behave.  Protecting an indef blocked IP's talk page is generally not the standard way of doing things... indef'ing an IP is pretty rare, too.  I tagged the page with the indef-blocked-IP template.  Someone may come back and ask you to change it to something like a 6 month or 1 year block; I won't, but don't be suprised if someone else does.   +++$+++ unless they escalate the threats, we need to give them somewhere to appeal the block if they decide to behave.  Protecting an indef blocked IP's talk page is generally not the standard way of doing things... indef'ing an IP is pretty rare, too.  I tagged the page with the indef-blocked-IP template.  Someone may come back and ask you to change it to something like a 6 month or 1 year block; I won't, but don't be suprised if someone else does.  [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] 22:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
543357 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543356 +++$+++ 543356 +++$+++ 2007-07-17 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.184736480E09 +++$+++ Okay. I suppose you do need to \"''give them somewhere to appeal the block if they decide to behave''\" - though I don't beleive there's much of chance in this case - but you never know. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Okay. I suppose you do need to "''give them somewhere to appeal the block if they decide to behave''" - though I don't beleive there's much of chance in this case - but you never know. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 22:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
543358 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543356 +++$+++ 543356 +++$+++ 2007-07-20 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.184984880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the link and your quick response as well as the suggestions on my new article. Happy editing, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Thanks for the link and your quick response as well as the suggestions on my new article. Happy editing, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 19:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

281214 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281214 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-19 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.169232420E09 +++$+++ Hello Deadkid dk.  I've never actually seen you complain about any of the Dynasty Warriors references or images appearing in the many Chinese historical figure articles you seem to patrol, although I always sense a hint of annoyance or dislike just beneath the surface.  Is there something in particular grating on you about the descriptions, or am I completely off the mark?  +++$+++ Hello Deadkid dk.  I've never actually seen you complain about any of the Dynasty Warriors references or images appearing in the many Chinese historical figure articles you seem to patrol, although I always sense a hint of annoyance or dislike just beneath the surface.  Is there something in particular grating on you about the descriptions, or am I completely off the mark? [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 10:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
281215 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281214 +++$+++ 281214 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.169234520E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I asked because some seem to feel that the games are an unwelcome intrusion into the historical context, although these same people are happy to accomodate the \"Romance of the Three Kingdoms\" descriptions into the articles. Go figure, eh?  +++$+++ :Anyway, I asked because some seem to feel that the games are an unwelcome intrusion into the historical context, although these same people are happy to accomodate the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" descriptions into the articles. Go figure, eh? [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 11:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
281216 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281214 +++$+++ 281215 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.169289180E09 +++$+++ True, that's why I only use the portraits at the bottom of the page and add as much or as little information as necessary depending on the size of the article.  Dynasty Warriors and RoTK are brilliant, but Koei\/Guanzhong interpretations shouldn't take priority over the historical figure they are based upon.  +++$+++ ::True, that's why I only use the portraits at the bottom of the page and add as much or as little information as necessary depending on the size of the article.  Dynasty Warriors and RoTK are brilliant, but Koei/Guanzhong interpretations shouldn't take priority over the historical figure they are based upon. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 02:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

543359 +++$+++ Southern Texas +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543359 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-24 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.185260460E09 +++$+++ Sorry about the fast revert. I've just been dealing with a lot of vandalism on this page today. I think your edits add to the article.-- +++$+++ Sorry about the fast revert. I've just been dealing with a lot of vandalism on this page today. I think your edits add to the article.--[[User:Southern Texas|Southern Texas]] 00:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
543360 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543359 +++$+++ 543359 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.185260520E09 +++$+++ I understand, thanks. Have fun editing, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I understand, thanks. Have fun editing, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

543361 +++$+++ Phoenix741 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-26 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.185474960E09 +++$+++ I have to ask this, and mind you I could of just used another IP to ask before my block is over, but far be it from me to defy the all mighty admins 8-\/. Anyway, here is the question, did you even look at the situation at all, did you even see what I was reverting, did you even see that other people at WikiProject Comics agreed that it was vandalism or did you just blindly block me cause of what you saw on the recent changes. Now please do not give me any BS reason or rules cause honestly I only follow one [[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules|rule]], just anserwer the question, either Yes I looked at the situation, or no I just blindly followed the rules. Thanks. +++$+++ I have to ask this, and mind you I could of just used another IP to ask before my block is over, but far be it from me to defy the all mighty admins 8-/. Anyway, here is the question, did you even look at the situation at all, did you even see what I was reverting, did you even see that other people at WikiProject Comics agreed that it was vandalism or did you just blindly block me cause of what you saw on the recent changes. Now please do not give me any BS reason or rules cause honestly I only follow one [[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules|rule]], just anserwer the question, either Yes I looked at the situation, or no I just blindly followed the rules. Thanks.[[User:Phoenix741|Phoenix741]] 11:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
543362 +++$+++ Phoenix741 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543361 +++$+++ 543361 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.185509820E09 +++$+++ And what leave that stuff that does not belong on wikipedia on there. After the 3rd revert I put something on his talk page and took off the info. Also, the wikiproject agreed that it was all theory and that it should of been removed, one even said that it was a form of vandalism because of the frequency that it kept poping up. There was no source, it was all theory, and I knew that. Your right I have been on here for at least a year, and besides this little incident, I have done nothing wrong, therefore don't you think I know what does belong on wikipedia, and what doesn't. Or are you so blinded by the rules that you just follow them with out looking at the situation. +++$+++ :And what leave that stuff that does not belong on wikipedia on there. After the 3rd revert I put something on his talk page and took off the info. Also, the wikiproject agreed that it was all theory and that it should of been removed, one even said that it was a form of vandalism because of the frequency that it kept poping up. There was no source, it was all theory, and I knew that. Your right I have been on here for at least a year, and besides this little incident, I have done nothing wrong, therefore don't you think I know what does belong on wikipedia, and what doesn't. Or are you so blinded by the rules that you just follow them with out looking at the situation.[[User:Phoenix741|Phoenix741]] 21:17, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
543363 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543361 +++$+++ 543362 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.185513840E09 +++$+++ If an entire Wikipedia project was behind you, why did you ask for administrative assitance. Why were only two users, you being one of them, engage in an edit war. I am impuing your skills as an editor, but you shouldn't have engaged in an edit war. Instead you should have contacted the other person, and\/or reported him or her - and yes sometimes that means leaving their edits in place, so long as they are not obvious vandalism. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ ::If an entire Wikipedia project was behind you, why did you ask for administrative assitance. Why were only two users, you being one of them, engage in an edit war. I am impuing your skills as an editor, but you shouldn't have engaged in an edit war. Instead you should have contacted the other person, and/or reported him or her - and yes sometimes that means leaving their edits in place, so long as they are not obvious vandalism. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 22:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

281218 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281218 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-24 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.169668380E09 +++$+++ Whoops, sorry about that, mate.  Reading closer, I see that it's about an anime\/manga and not ''Dynasty Warriors''.  I should pay more attention, eh? Sorry again.  +++$+++ Whoops, sorry about that, mate.  Reading closer, I see that it's about an anime/manga and not ''Dynasty Warriors''.  I should pay more attention, eh? Sorry again. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 11:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
281219 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281218 +++$+++ 281218 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.169668560E09 +++$+++ No worries, and no need to be so apologetic. If it seems like I'm pissed off, I'm not, that's just the way I talk.  +++$+++ :No worries, and no need to be so apologetic. If it seems like I'm pissed off, I'm not, that's just the way I talk. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 11:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
281220 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281218 +++$+++ 281219 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.169668980E09 +++$+++ I didn't think you were angry, I guess that's just the way I talk, too.  I should be more of an arsehole and then tell people you encouraged it ;)  +++$+++ ::I didn't think you were angry, I guess that's just the way I talk, too.  I should be more of an arsehole and then tell people you encouraged it ;) [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 12:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

46870 +++$+++ Tomticker5 +++$+++ Born2flie +++$+++ 46870 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-10 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.255221720E09 +++$+++ I'm the Secretary of the Trumbull Historical Society in CT. We've been awarded a state grant to survey historic buildings in Trumbull. Sikorsky owned a house and 36 acres of land on Huntington Tpke. in the Nichols area from the late 1920s to the early 1950s and it's rumored that he built a helipad there. The 1934 aerial survey of CT by the CT Air Guard clearly shows an enclosed clearing with steps leading to it and possibly a man-made object sitting in it (helicopter). We'd like to pursue listing the house on the National Register of Historic Places or even pursue listing it as a State or National Historic Site. I have included the fact that Igor owned and lived in Nichols as a part of the wiki articles of the Nichols NRHP District page as his patents clearly indicate he was from Nichols, Connecticut. I would think that his hometown should be included in his biography wiki page, don't you?  +++$+++ I'm the Secretary of the Trumbull Historical Society in CT. We've been awarded a state grant to survey historic buildings in Trumbull. Sikorsky owned a house and 36 acres of land on Huntington Tpke. in the Nichols area from the late 1920s to the early 1950s and it's rumored that he built a helipad there. The 1934 aerial survey of CT by the CT Air Guard clearly shows an enclosed clearing with steps leading to it and possibly a man-made object sitting in it (helicopter). We'd like to pursue listing the house on the National Register of Historic Places or even pursue listing it as a State or National Historic Site. I have included the fact that Igor owned and lived in Nichols as a part of the wiki articles of the Nichols NRHP District page as his patents clearly indicate he was from Nichols, Connecticut. I would think that his hometown should be included in his biography wiki page, don't you? [[User:Tomticker5|Tomticker5]] ([[User talk:Tomticker5|talk]]) 17:42, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
46871 +++$+++ Born2flie +++$+++ Born2flie +++$+++ 46870 +++$+++ 46870 +++$+++ 2009-10-10 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.255225440E09 +++$+++ On a side note, the Nichols Farms article seems to suggest that Sikorsky's home was excluded from the historic district. I'm not sure if that is what you meant to portray in the discussion of Sikorsky's home. -- +++$+++ :On a side note, the Nichols Farms article seems to suggest that Sikorsky's home was excluded from the historic district. I'm not sure if that is what you meant to portray in the discussion of Sikorsky's home. --[[User:Born2flie|Born2flie]] ([[User talk:Born2flie#top|talk]]) 18:44, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
46872 +++$+++ Born2flie +++$+++ Born2flie +++$+++ 46870 +++$+++ 46871 +++$+++ 2009-10-11 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.255263000E09 +++$+++ After considering your comments on the aerial photographic survey, it might be interesting for you to note that Sergei Sikorsky, Igor's son, stated in his book ''The Sikorsky Legacy'' (Arcadia Publishing, 2007), that his father and a group of close associates did not begin work on the VS-1 until early 1939. The VS-1 was later designated the VS-300, the patent for which had not even been awarded until 1935. So, it seems even more unlikely that it was a \"helipad\", as such a conveyance as the helicopter was yet to be successfully flown in the United States. Also, please consider that the Air Force, and necessarily the Air National Guard (or Air Guard) did not exist until 1947. However, it is possible that it was an [[United States Army Air Corps]] aerial survey that was the source of your photographic enigma. -- +++$+++ ::After considering your comments on the aerial photographic survey, it might be interesting for you to note that Sergei Sikorsky, Igor's son, stated in his book ''The Sikorsky Legacy'' (Arcadia Publishing, 2007), that his father and a group of close associates did not begin work on the VS-1 until early 1939. The VS-1 was later designated the VS-300, the patent for which had not even been awarded until 1935. So, it seems even more unlikely that it was a "helipad", as such a conveyance as the helicopter was yet to be successfully flown in the United States. Also, please consider that the Air Force, and necessarily the Air National Guard (or Air Guard) did not exist until 1947. However, it is possible that it was an [[United States Army Air Corps]] aerial survey that was the source of your photographic enigma. --[[User:Born2flie|Born2flie]] ([[User talk:Born2flie#top|talk]]) 05:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

543369 +++$+++ 67.41.152.96 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543369 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-27 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.185520380E09 +++$+++ You don't know what you are talking about. I'm providing sources in [[Toyota]] article or you are bigotted person who wants GM to be number one. Your provide your sources. The other users were making POV biased and false entries. Look at the facts.  +++$+++ You don't know what you are talking about. I'm providing sources in [[Toyota]] article or you are bigotted person who wants GM to be number one. Your provide your sources. The other users were making POV biased and false entries. Look at the facts. [[User:67.41.152.96|67.41.152.96]] 00:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
543370 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543369 +++$+++ 543369 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.185521100E09 +++$+++ I'm not involved in editing either of the article. I simply responded to complaints about disruptive edits. If you think an article is biased raise the issue on the talk page, start a [[WP:RfC|Request for Comment]] but do not intitiate an edit war. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I'm not involved in editing either of the article. I simply responded to complaints about disruptive edits. If you think an article is biased raise the issue on the talk page, start a [[WP:RfC|Request for Comment]] but do not intitiate an edit war. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

281228 +++$+++ Saikano +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.170987780E09 +++$+++ LOOK, NHK IS A LOLICON FROM WHAT ANIME SITES, THE HOMEPAGE, &THE PEOPLE WHO WORKED ON IT SAY! SO STOP REMOVEING IT PLEASE FOR THE 2nd TIME. IF NOT I WILL REPORT YOU TO WHO EVER!!!-- +++$+++ LOOK, NHK IS A LOLICON FROM WHAT ANIME SITES, THE HOMEPAGE, &THE PEOPLE WHO WORKED ON IT SAY! SO STOP REMOVEING IT PLEASE FOR THE 2nd TIME. IF NOT I WILL REPORT YOU TO WHO EVER!!!--[[User:Saikano|saikano]] 18:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
281229 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281228 +++$+++ 281228 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.170988200E09 +++$+++ Hi, I think you need to practice [[WP:DGAF|what you have on your Userpage]]. The anime sites, the homepage, and the people who worked on it didn't say anything about it, and I can actually read Japanese. The series covered lolicon, but that's just a minor part of it. (Misaki is no loli.)  +++$+++ :Hi, I think you need to practice [[WP:DGAF|what you have on your Userpage]]. The anime sites, the homepage, and the people who worked on it didn't say anything about it, and I can actually read Japanese. The series covered lolicon, but that's just a minor part of it. (Misaki is no loli.) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 18:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

281230 +++$+++ Saikano +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.170988680E09 +++$+++ Its sexual for the love of Neko! What part of lolicon dont you get?! It does not matter. I have not seen it, just the AMVs & funny clips of it, the point is lolicon is any sexual anime involving charaters below 18 yrs in the USA! NHK=LOLICON MAN.-- +++$+++ Its sexual for the love of Neko! What part of lolicon dont you get?! It does not matter. I have not seen it, just the AMVs & funny clips of it, the point is lolicon is any sexual anime involving charaters below 18 yrs in the USA! NHK=LOLICON MAN.--[[User:Saikano|saikano]] 18:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
281231 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281230 +++$+++ 281230 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.170988920E09 +++$+++ Okay, end of discussion.  +++$+++ :Okay, end of discussion. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 18:42, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

543375 +++$+++ Brcdck +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-09 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.189407120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Brcdck|Brcdck]] 23:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
543376 +++$+++ Metros +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543375 +++$+++ 543375 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.189407840E09 +++$+++ For full disclosure to BrendelSignature...Brcdck made the comment at saying \"What else in the world do you want?\" and I made a joke  about what I'd love to have in this world.  It was a joke to lighten a increasingly heated conversation.  And I do believe I have listened with logic and good intent.  It has just been extremely frustrating that you have missed the point of what we are saying about the sources...how they work for talking about his companies but they don't work for talking about him.  We have reiterated that several times but it seems to go past you each time.  We ''are'' being neutral and such, you are just not listening to what we're saying about how this article needs sources to help it meet the standards of Wikipedia.   +++$+++ :For full disclosure to BrendelSignature...Brcdck made the comment at saying "What else in the world do you want?" and I made a joke  about what I'd love to have in this world.  It was a joke to lighten a increasingly heated conversation.  And I do believe I have listened with logic and good intent.  It has just been extremely frustrating that you have missed the point of what we are saying about the sources...how they work for talking about his companies but they don't work for talking about him.  We have reiterated that several times but it seems to go past you each time.  We ''are'' being neutral and such, you are just not listening to what we're saying about how this article needs sources to help it meet the standards of Wikipedia.  [[User:Metros|Metros]] 00:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

281232 +++$+++ Saikano +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-08 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.170989400E09 +++$+++ DID YOU NOT JUST HERE ME SR.? DO YOU SPEAK AMERICAN?! LET ME REPEAT IT FOR YOU:What part of lolicon dont you get?! It does not matter how much sexual content is in it,its still lolicon.That like you kissing a guy,no matter what you do or say,your gay,you can beat the hell out of the WWE CHAIRMAN, you will just be known as the gay guy who beat the hell out of V.K.M.! get it?!-- +++$+++ DID YOU NOT JUST HERE ME SR.? DO YOU SPEAK AMERICAN?! LET ME REPEAT IT FOR YOU:What part of lolicon dont you get?! It does not matter how much sexual content is in it,its still lolicon.That like you kissing a guy,no matter what you do or say,your gay,you can beat the hell out of the WWE CHAIRMAN, you will just be known as the gay guy who beat the hell out of V.K.M.! get it?!--[[User:Saikano|saikano]] 18:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
281233 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281232 +++$+++ 281232 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.170989460E09 +++$+++ Sorry I don't speak American.  +++$+++ :Sorry I don't speak American. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 18:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
281234 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281232 +++$+++ 281232 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.170990060E09 +++$+++ I also don't speak Babelfish, but I think you're hilarious.  +++$+++ :I also don't speak Babelfish, but I think you're hilarious. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 19:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

543377 +++$+++ Brcdck +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543377 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-10 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.189421400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Brcdck|Brcdck]] 03:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
543378 +++$+++ Metros +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543377 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.189422300E09 +++$+++ Okay, you're not understanding this at all.  There are plenty of sources about his company's accomplishments and all that, but there's no sources about his life, in other words his biography.  THIS is why we keep the tag stating it reads like a resume up.  Because it is basically sourced only to summarize his accomplishments with his company but not with his life.  '''We understand you have sources about his companies'''.  But where in the heck do you find out he graduated from Waubonsie High School from a press release about a corporate buy out?  None of the sources you're providing are giving reliable, neutral information through third-party sources about '''his life''' and ''not'' his companies.   +++$+++ ::Okay, you're not understanding this at all.  There are plenty of sources about his company's accomplishments and all that, but there's no sources about his life, in other words his biography.  THIS is why we keep the tag stating it reads like a resume up.  Because it is basically sourced only to summarize his accomplishments with his company but not with his life.  '''We understand you have sources about his companies'''.  But where in the heck do you find out he graduated from Waubonsie High School from a press release about a corporate buy out?  None of the sources you're providing are giving reliable, neutral information through third-party sources about '''his life''' and ''not'' his companies.  [[User:Metros|Metros]] 04:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

541836 +++$+++ Mahanga +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541836 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-23 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.177396800E09 +++$+++ [[WP:TWINKLE]] only works on [[Firefox]] or [[Opera (browser)|Opera]] web browsers. It probably won't work if you're using Internet Explorer. Note, you don't ''need'' to use twinkle for revert functionality. [[Help:Reverting#Undo]] shows you. Let me know if you can't get either of those to work. <span class=\"sigInvitatious\"> +++$+++ [[WP:TWINKLE]] only works on [[Firefox]] or [[Opera (browser)|Opera]] web browsers. It probably won't work if you're using Internet Explorer. Note, you don't ''need'' to use twinkle for revert functionality. [[Help:Reverting#Undo]] shows you. Let me know if you can't get either of those to work. <span class="sigInvitatious">[[User:Mahanga|Mahanga]]<sup>[[User talk:Mahanga|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]</sup></span> 23:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
541837 +++$+++ Mahanga +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541836 +++$+++ 541836 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.177568760E09 +++$+++ Twinkle is wonky? What exactly is wrong? I'm not sure I understand your second question. You want a tab that inserts a {{tl|prod}} to an article? TWINKLE already does that. One thing I found out though is if you increase the font size or if you have too many tabs, then it doesn't show up. I removed the welcome template, since it wasn't working anyway. The prod should show up now. <span class=\"sigInvitatious\"> +++$+++ :Twinkle is wonky? What exactly is wrong? I'm not sure I understand your second question. You want a tab that inserts a {{tl|prod}} to an article? TWINKLE already does that. One thing I found out though is if you increase the font size or if you have too many tabs, then it doesn't show up. I removed the welcome template, since it wasn't working anyway. The prod should show up now. <span class="sigInvitatious">[[User:Mahanga|Mahanga]]<sup>[[User talk:Mahanga|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]</sup></span> 23:26, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

543380 +++$+++ MrZaius +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543380 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-10 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.189412340E09 +++$+++ Spare some advice? An editor was previously duplicating [[lolcat]] on [[caturday]] and contested its replacement with a redirect to lolcat, to prevent said duplication. Finally dropped the point, but has since made at least 10 edits to that redirect to point it at a page ([[4chan]]) that makes absolutely no mention of the phenomenon, ignoring repeated complaints from multiple editors. However, the editor does seem to make other, positive, contributions to the wiki, so I'd feel iffy about bringing this up on the noticeboard and getting the guy blocked. Requesting full protection for the redirect would probably fix it, but a short time period wouldn't stop him - he only does this every couple of weeks anyway, and it certainly isn't a conventional case for protection, given the very low number of editors (there's one or two others, but only sporadically\/weeks apart) that would make other negative changes. Which way would you move on it, or would you just say \"suffer through it and keep rv'ing\"? Getting to be a slight pain, but it doesn't come up all that terribly often.  +++$+++ Spare some advice? An editor was previously duplicating [[lolcat]] on [[caturday]] and contested its replacement with a redirect to lolcat, to prevent said duplication. Finally dropped the point, but has since made at least 10 edits to that redirect to point it at a page ([[4chan]]) that makes absolutely no mention of the phenomenon, ignoring repeated complaints from multiple editors. However, the editor does seem to make other, positive, contributions to the wiki, so I'd feel iffy about bringing this up on the noticeboard and getting the guy blocked. Requesting full protection for the redirect would probably fix it, but a short time period wouldn't stop him - he only does this every couple of weeks anyway, and it certainly isn't a conventional case for protection, given the very low number of editors (there's one or two others, but only sporadically/weeks apart) that would make other negative changes. Which way would you move on it, or would you just say "suffer through it and keep rv'ing"? Getting to be a slight pain, but it doesn't come up all that terribly often. [[User:MrZaius|<font color="Blue">'''MrZaius'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:MrZaius|'''<font color="Blue">talk</font>''']]</sup> 01:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
543381 +++$+++ MrZaius +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543380 +++$+++ 543380 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.189425240E09 +++$+++ n\/m. Just hit 3rr violation without any attempt to explain his edits. Puts me pretty squarely in the noticeboard camp, unfortunately.  +++$+++ :n/m. Just hit 3rr violation without any attempt to explain his edits. Puts me pretty squarely in the noticeboard camp, unfortunately. [[User:MrZaius|<font color="Blue">'''MrZaius'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:MrZaius|'''<font color="Blue">talk</font>''']]</sup> 04:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
543382 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543380 +++$+++ 543381 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.189515720E09 +++$+++ It seems another editor already took care of it. I am sorry for not being online to react quickly enough, but I haven't had much time for Wikipedia lately as I'm quite busy in real life. Feel free to let me know anytime you need an admin's help - just remeber that I'm not going to be online as much for the next couple of weeks. Thanks for being a great editor. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ ::It seems another editor already took care of it. I am sorry for not being online to react quickly enough, but I haven't had much time for Wikipedia lately as I'm quite busy in real life. Feel free to let me know anytime you need an admin's help - just remeber that I'm not going to be online as much for the next couple of weeks. Thanks for being a great editor. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

281238 +++$+++ Ozgod +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.172488800E09 +++$+++ Hello - just wanted to clear up that I am not ''specifically'' targeting the subjects from the ''Three Kingdoms'' - I am part of an assessment project and am currently in the process of assessing unassessed articles tagged to the WPBiography project. My current ranger is from '''X''' through '''Z'''. I am nominating the articles since they lack any substantial biographical information and contain no references and would appear to be characters rather than actual people. This is debatable, however, so I am leaving it to the community to decide whether or not the articles should remain or stay. I hope this is not offending you in anyway and please, if you can, furnish the articles with any information. -- +++$+++ Hello - just wanted to clear up that I am not ''specifically'' targeting the subjects from the ''Three Kingdoms'' - I am part of an assessment project and am currently in the process of assessing unassessed articles tagged to the WPBiography project. My current ranger is from '''X''' through '''Z'''. I am nominating the articles since they lack any substantial biographical information and contain no references and would appear to be characters rather than actual people. This is debatable, however, so I am leaving it to the community to decide whether or not the articles should remain or stay. I hope this is not offending you in anyway and please, if you can, furnish the articles with any information. --[[User:Ozgod|Ozgod]] 03:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
281239 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281238 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.172543280E09 +++$+++ You have also sent a similar message to me, but though I find the original deletion perhaps understandable, I do not find it so understandable that you are continuing. The WP article on the novel makes clear that this is one of the great classic Chinese novels, that it is historical fiction, and that all the principal characters are both in the novel and in real-world history. This is making a great deal of work for the rest of the people at AfD, but perhaps someone will as a result adopt them. ''' +++$+++ ::You have also sent a similar message to me, but though I find the original deletion perhaps understandable, I do not find it so understandable that you are continuing. The WP article on the novel makes clear that this is one of the great classic Chinese novels, that it is historical fiction, and that all the principal characters are both in the novel and in real-world history. This is making a great deal of work for the rest of the people at AfD, but perhaps someone will as a result adopt them. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' 18:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

543383 +++$+++ Googie man +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-18 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.190109060E09 +++$+++ Hello, [[User:Googie_man|Googie Man]] here again, asking for your help with a persistent problematic user.  Here's the jist.  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Reggie9.jpg This] is a copyrighted and therefore stolen image which the user implies that he took. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Reggie_Jackson&oldid=158609578 Here] is the ultimate destination of the image. The original can be found [http:\/\/www.herzogmotorsports.com\/owners.html here].  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Jjj222 Jjj222] took down my legitimately taken image twice and replaced it with one that I'm positive he did not take, despite his claims to the contrary.  I don't need to explain to you the obvious and numerous problems this user is needlessly creating.  The one unforeseen problem is this - I spend a lot of time and money going to baseball games for the sole purpose of taking pictures I can donate to Wikipedia, and this user, who is really more like a vandal, completely negates my work in a matter of seconds for no good reason.  I'm getting to the point that my baseball pictures will simply go to my Flickr page, where I don't have to concern myself with constant protection.  Please again, help me and Wikipedia do the right thing.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Hello, [[User:Googie_man|Googie Man]] here again, asking for your help with a persistent problematic user.  Here's the jist.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Reggie9.jpg This] is a copyrighted and therefore stolen image which the user implies that he took. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reggie_Jackson&oldid=158609578 Here] is the ultimate destination of the image. The original can be found [http://www.herzogmotorsports.com/owners.html here].  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jjj222 Jjj222] took down my legitimately taken image twice and replaced it with one that I'm positive he did not take, despite his claims to the contrary.  I don't need to explain to you the obvious and numerous problems this user is needlessly creating.  The one unforeseen problem is this - I spend a lot of time and money going to baseball games for the sole purpose of taking pictures I can donate to Wikipedia, and this user, who is really more like a vandal, completely negates my work in a matter of seconds for no good reason.  I'm getting to the point that my baseball pictures will simply go to my Flickr page, where I don't have to concern myself with constant protection.  Please again, help me and Wikipedia do the right thing.  Thanks, [[User:Googie man|Googie man]] 02:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
543384 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543383 +++$+++ 543383 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 07:19:00 +++$+++ 1.190211540E09 +++$+++ I see, thanks for doing the right thing and seeking admin help. I'm sorry I didn't respond faster. Another admin has deleted the image Jjj222 uploaded. I warned J2... about lying on image source description & WP image policy. I have also restored your image to the Reggie Jackson article. This should solve the problem for now... keep me posted (It maybe take little while for me to respond though). Try and enjoy editing WP, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I see, thanks for doing the right thing and seeking admin help. I'm sorry I didn't respond faster. Another admin has deleted the image Jjj222 uploaded. I warned J2... about lying on image source description & WP image policy. I have also restored your image to the Reggie Jackson article. This should solve the problem for now... keep me posted (It maybe take little while for me to respond though). Try and enjoy editing WP, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 07:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
543385 +++$+++ Googie man +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543383 +++$+++ 543384 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.190235240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for helping!  We'll see what happens...Best regards,  +++$+++ ::Thanks for helping!  We'll see what happens...Best regards, [[User:Googie man|Googie man]] 13:54, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

281241 +++$+++ Juhachi +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281241 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-02 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.172848140E09 +++$+++ I have been wanting to do with for some time and thought that maybe you could help. What would you think about creating an article on [[Danbooru]]? I think the website was notable enough for inclusion with [[WP:WEB]], though I think the bulk of the article should contain a history section, citing of course how long its lifespan was and its recent death. Do you think we could create something like that?-- +++$+++ I have been wanting to do with for some time and thought that maybe you could help. What would you think about creating an article on [[Danbooru]]? I think the website was notable enough for inclusion with [[WP:WEB]], though I think the bulk of the article should contain a history section, citing of course how long its lifespan was and its recent death. Do you think we could create something like that?--[[User:Juhachi|'''<font color="0066cc">十</font>''']][[User talk:Juhachi|'''<font color="ff66cc">八</font>''']] 07:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
281242 +++$+++ Juhachi +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281241 +++$+++ 281241 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.173030180E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know if you didn't already that a new dabooru called sagubooru has popped up with all the old posts from danbooru: [http:\/\/www.sagubooru.com\/ sagubooru].-- +++$+++ :Just wanted to let you know if you didn't already that a new dabooru called sagubooru has popped up with all the old posts from danbooru: [http://www.sagubooru.com/ sagubooru].--[[User:Juhachi|'''<font color="0066cc">十</font>''']][[User talk:Juhachi|'''<font color="ff66cc">八</font>''']] 09:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
281243 +++$+++ Juhachi +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281241 +++$+++ 281241 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.173035640E09 +++$+++ Danbooru creator released the code yesterday and I guess they somehow transfers the entire database over to sagubooru's admin; but who cares as long as it's back. =) -- +++$+++ :Danbooru creator released the code yesterday and I guess they somehow transfers the entire database over to sagubooru's admin; but who cares as long as it's back. =) --[[User:Juhachi|'''<font color="0066cc">十</font>''']][[User talk:Juhachi|'''<font color="ff66cc">八</font>''']] 11:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

543386 +++$+++ Googie man +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.190238240E09 +++$+++ the [[Reggie Jackson]] page with the stolen image.  [[User:Gmh224|Here]] is the page for this troll's sockpuppet.  Thanks in advance for anything you can do to stop this guy.   +++$+++ the [[Reggie Jackson]] page with the stolen image.  [[User:Gmh224|Here]] is the page for this troll's sockpuppet.  Thanks in advance for anything you can do to stop this guy.  [[User:Googie man|Googie man]] 14:44, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
543387 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543386 +++$+++ 543386 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.190251020E09 +++$+++ I have semi-protected the article for 4 days in order to prevent newly created socks from continuin the edit warring. I will take a close look at the accounts you've listed above this evening. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I have semi-protected the article for 4 days in order to prevent newly created socks from continuin the edit warring. I will take a close look at the accounts you've listed above this evening. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 18:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
543388 +++$+++ Googie man +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543386 +++$+++ 543387 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.190251680E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Thanks! [[User:Googie man|Googie man]] 18:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

19100 +++$+++ Musimax +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-21 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.266797400E09 +++$+++ Hey, since I believe you were the one who started the non-political programming section in the CPAC article, I thought I would come to you. I was wondering if you had any idea whether or not CPAC has aired any Canada Day coverage before. They were given approval for it on June 29, 2009, [http:\/\/www.crtc.gc.ca\/eng\/archive\/2009\/2009-390.htm the decision is here], however, I'm not sure if they had aired any yet. I was going to add it to the article, but I'm not sure if they have aired any or not yet. I though I'd  ask you and maybe you'd know, and then maybe I'd add something on it to the article.  +++$+++ Hey, since I believe you were the one who started the non-political programming section in the CPAC article, I thought I would come to you. I was wondering if you had any idea whether or not CPAC has aired any Canada Day coverage before. They were given approval for it on June 29, 2009, [http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-390.htm the decision is here], however, I'm not sure if they had aired any yet. I was going to add it to the article, but I'm not sure if they have aired any or not yet. I though I'd  ask you and maybe you'd know, and then maybe I'd add something on it to the article. [[User:Musimax|musimax.]] ([[User talk:Musimax|talk]]) 16:10, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
19101 +++$+++ Musimax +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19100 +++$+++ 19100 +++$+++ 2010-02-21 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.266824340E09 +++$+++ K, thanks for the info.  +++$+++ :K, thanks for the info. [[User:Musimax|musimax.]] ([[User talk:Musimax|talk]]) 23:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

281245 +++$+++ Keefer4 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-08 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.173349740E09 +++$+++ Hi this seems to have been left dormant for quite a while, but the trend is towards a merge (5-3). Just thought I'd drop you a line since you were the nominator. I'd be happy to merge them in the near future unless a bunch of '''opposes''' fly onto page, which in unlikely. Cheers. +++$+++ Hi this seems to have been left dormant for quite a while, but the trend is towards a merge (5-3). Just thought I'd drop you a line since you were the nominator. I'd be happy to merge them in the near future unless a bunch of '''opposes''' fly onto page, which in unlikely. Cheers.[[User:Keefer4|Keefer4]] 02:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
281246 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281245 +++$+++ 281245 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.173350340E09 +++$+++ That'd be great, thanks.  +++$+++ :That'd be great, thanks. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 02:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

281247 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-09 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.173474360E09 +++$+++ Hello, dk.  Perhaps they've changed the script, but I'd read that Chow Yun Fat will be cast as Liu Bei, not Zhou Yu.  Are you certain of his role?  +++$+++ Hello, dk.  Perhaps they've changed the script, but I'd read that Chow Yun Fat will be cast as Liu Bei, not Zhou Yu.  Are you certain of his role? [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 13:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
281248 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281247 +++$+++ 281247 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.173560760E09 +++$+++ Okay then, if that's what they've gone with.  I noticed Takeshi Kaneshiro is also set to join the cast.  I think he's the guy who portrayed Samanosuke Akechi in the ''Onimusha'' games.  +++$+++ :Okay then, if that's what they've gone with.  I noticed Takeshi Kaneshiro is also set to join the cast.  I think he's the guy who portrayed Samanosuke Akechi in the ''Onimusha'' games. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 13:06, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

19104 +++$+++ Musimax +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-27 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.288226940E09 +++$+++ Hi. OK, I see your points. I'd be fine with having separate articles for both companies.  +++$+++ Hi. OK, I see your points. I'd be fine with having separate articles for both companies. [[User:Musimax|musimax.]] ([[User talk:Musimax|talk]]) 17:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
19105 +++$+++ Musimax +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19104 +++$+++ 19104 +++$+++ 2010-10-27 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.288227420E09 +++$+++ However, I do think the [[List of assets owned by Shaw Communications and Corus Entertainment]] article should be split back up into two separate articles for Shaw Media and Corus because they are considered two separate companies. Corus may be controlled by the Shaw family, but is considered independent from Shaw Media. I think it's best to keep the two separate.  +++$+++ :However, I do think the [[List of assets owned by Shaw Communications and Corus Entertainment]] article should be split back up into two separate articles for Shaw Media and Corus because they are considered two separate companies. Corus may be controlled by the Shaw family, but is considered independent from Shaw Media. I think it's best to keep the two separate. [[User:Musimax|musimax.]] ([[User talk:Musimax|talk]]) 17:57, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

281249 +++$+++ Ronbo76 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281249 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-12 06:15:00 +++$+++ 1.173705300E09 +++$+++ I think I clicked the wrong button and saved a past version I was looking at that reverted back the Sun Tzi. I went back a couple of versions to find his picture which is Sunzi.png. I thought I had opened a new version of the article to correct the picture's name but must have goofed. Thanks,  +++$+++ I think I clicked the wrong button and saved a past version I was looking at that reverted back the Sun Tzi. I went back a couple of versions to find his picture which is Sunzi.png. I thought I had opened a new version of the article to correct the picture's name but must have goofed. Thanks, [[User:Ronbo76|Ronbo76]] 06:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
281250 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281249 +++$+++ 281249 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.173708480E09 +++$+++ No problem.  +++$+++ :No problem. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 07:08, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

19106 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19106 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-06 06:47:00 +++$+++ 1.291646820E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of \"file\" pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:MyContributions|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]] 06:47, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
19107 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Stickguy +++$+++ 19106 +++$+++ 19106 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.296020100E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing![[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  21:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

281254 +++$+++ TCB007 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-22 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.174569600E09 +++$+++ Re:  \"rv. 6 million buddhists out of 7 million people in hk?\"  I've edited the religion section again to further clarify.. I've left your figures regarding \"authentic\" Buddhism but to answer your question - yes, there are around 6 million Buddhists out of 7 million people in Hong Kong according to [[Buddhism by country]] (unless that is also incorrect).  Also, your figure of 500,000 Christians out of a population of 6,864,000 is only around 7% and not 10%.  Cheers,  +++$+++ Re:  "rv. 6 million buddhists out of 7 million people in hk?"  I've edited the religion section again to further clarify.. I've left your figures regarding "authentic" Buddhism but to answer your question - yes, there are around 6 million Buddhists out of 7 million people in Hong Kong according to [[Buddhism by country]] (unless that is also incorrect).  Also, your figure of 500,000 Christians out of a population of 6,864,000 is only around 7% and not 10%.  Cheers, [[User:TCB007|TCB007]] 06:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
281255 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281254 +++$+++ 281254 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.174584060E09 +++$+++ Those are not my figures, I just reverted to the last version. I'll leave the discussion to the more knowledgeable people.  +++$+++ :Those are not my figures, I just reverted to the last version. I'll leave the discussion to the more knowledgeable people. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 10:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

19111 +++$+++ Willmcw +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19111 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-13 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.134489240E09 +++$+++ Please don't move articles by cutting and pasting their contents. It causes a series of problems.  The right way is to use the \"Move this page\" link on the left. Thanks, - +++$+++ Please don't move articles by cutting and pasting their contents. It causes a series of problems.  The right way is to use the "Move this page" link on the left. Thanks, -[[User:Willmcw|Willmcw]] 07:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
19112 +++$+++ Willmcw +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19111 +++$+++ 19111 +++$+++ 2005-12-13 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.134544740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your work. Please read over the guideline on article titles ([[Wikipedia:Naming conventions]] etc) and page moves ([[Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages]]) before making further changes. Cheers, - +++$+++ :Thanks for your work. Please read over the guideline on article titles ([[Wikipedia:Naming conventions]] etc) and page moves ([[Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages]]) before making further changes. Cheers, -[[User:Willmcw|Willmcw]] 23:19, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

19114 +++$+++ Qutezuce +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19114 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-18 04:20:00 +++$+++ 1.150629600E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you have been adding the CFL players category to a bunch of pages that are already in a subcategory (Argos players, Stampeders players, etc). Usually you don't need to do this (ie [[Wikipedia:Categorization#Some general guidelines]]). Do you feel that this is a case when it is a good idea to categorize them in this way?  +++$+++ I noticed that you have been adding the CFL players category to a bunch of pages that are already in a subcategory (Argos players, Stampeders players, etc). Usually you don't need to do this (ie [[Wikipedia:Categorization#Some general guidelines]]). Do you feel that this is a case when it is a good idea to categorize them in this way? [[User:Qutezuce|Qutezuce]] 04:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
19115 +++$+++ Qutezuce +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19114 +++$+++ 19114 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.150632600E09 +++$+++ I think the reason the CFL players category has so many people is just a legacy, there probably weren't individual team categories at some point, just the CFL players category. So if it's all the same to you how about we try to just put players into their team categories.  +++$+++ :I think the reason the CFL players category has so many people is just a legacy, there probably weren't individual team categories at some point, just the CFL players category. So if it's all the same to you how about we try to just put players into their team categories. [[User:Qutezuce|Qutezuce]] 05:10, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

281259 +++$+++ Cao Wei +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281259 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-04 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.175681940E09 +++$+++ I want to thank you for your help on the [[Battle of Mount Dingjun]]. It still has a long way to go, but you made it what it is. I'd do more on it, but I haven't a clue where to look for information...any suggestions? -- +++$+++ I want to thank you for your help on the [[Battle of Mount Dingjun]]. It still has a long way to go, but you made it what it is. I'd do more on it, but I haven't a clue where to look for information...any suggestions? --[[User:Cao Wei|Cao Wei]] 03:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
281260 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281259 +++$+++ 281259 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.175691420E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.anu.edu.au\/asianstudies\/decrespigny\/peace2_index.html Rafe de Crespigny's work] is a great source. Thanks for the compliments. =)  +++$+++ :[http://www.anu.edu.au/asianstudies/decrespigny/peace2_index.html Rafe de Crespigny's work] is a great source. Thanks for the compliments. =) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 05:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

281261 +++$+++ Nlu +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281261 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-07 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.175993700E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your help in cleaning up [[:Category:People of the Three Kingdoms]].  It's a messy category, and it happens to be not the strong part of my Chinese history repertoire, so I do hope to be getting more help from you.  Thanks.  -- +++$+++ I appreciate your help in cleaning up [[:Category:People of the Three Kingdoms]].  It's a messy category, and it happens to be not the strong part of my Chinese history repertoire, so I do hope to be getting more help from you.  Thanks.  --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 17:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
281262 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281261 +++$+++ 281261 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.175994120E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. I'm just glad somebody is taking care of that mammoth of a category.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. I'm just glad somebody is taking care of that mammoth of a category. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 18:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

281263 +++$+++ Nlu +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-07 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.176005160E09 +++$+++ As it turns out, [[:Category:Han Dynasty people related to the Three Kingdoms]] is probably getting a little too large itself, and at some point, I'd like to split it further.  Do you have some thoughts on how to do so?  (I am currently considering splitting it into such categories as [[:Category:Dong Zhuo and associates]], [[:Category:Yuan Shao and associates]], &c.)  Thoughts would be appreciated.  -- +++$+++ As it turns out, [[:Category:Han Dynasty people related to the Three Kingdoms]] is probably getting a little too large itself, and at some point, I'd like to split it further.  Do you have some thoughts on how to do so?  (I am currently considering splitting it into such categories as [[:Category:Dong Zhuo and associates]], [[:Category:Yuan Shao and associates]], &c.)  Thoughts would be appreciated.  --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 21:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
281264 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281263 +++$+++ 281263 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.176008460E09 +++$+++ If you're splitting it like that, then it would lead to things like [[:Category:Liu Bei and associates]], which, when combined with [[:Category:People of Shu Han]], would be a bit confusing...I think.  +++$+++ :If you're splitting it like that, then it would lead to things like [[:Category:Liu Bei and associates]], which, when combined with [[:Category:People of Shu Han]], would be a bit confusing...I think. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
281265 +++$+++ Nlu +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281263 +++$+++ 281264 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.176015060E09 +++$+++ Perhaps, and that's why I'd like your thoughts on it.  However, there can simply ''not'' be such categories as [[:Category:Liu Bei and associates]] and [[:Category:Sun Quan and associates]], as both are likely to be subsumed under [[:Category:People of Shu Han]] and [[:Category:People of Eastern Wu]], respectively.  (That's not quite true of [[:Category:Cao Cao and associates]], however.)  -- +++$+++ ::Perhaps, and that's why I'd like your thoughts on it.  However, there can simply ''not'' be such categories as [[:Category:Liu Bei and associates]] and [[:Category:Sun Quan and associates]], as both are likely to be subsumed under [[:Category:People of Shu Han]] and [[:Category:People of Eastern Wu]], respectively.  (That's not quite true of [[:Category:Cao Cao and associates]], however.)  --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 23:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
281266 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281263 +++$+++ 281265 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.176037560E09 +++$+++ Here's a wild idea, what about having [[:Category:People of Cao Wei]] under [[:Category:Cao Cao and associates]]?  +++$+++ :::Here's a wild idea, what about having [[:Category:People of Cao Wei]] under [[:Category:Cao Cao and associates]]? [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 06:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
281267 +++$+++ Nlu +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281263 +++$+++ 281266 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.176043620E09 +++$+++ I don't think that's a good idea, because there were a lot of people of Cao Wei who had no associations whatsoever with Cao Cao, personally.  (Under this organization -- which, as you pointed out, has its problems -- I envision [[:Category:Sun Jian and associates]] and [[:Category:Sun Ce and associates]] to be separate categories, for example.  -- +++$+++ ::::I don't think that's a good idea, because there were a lot of people of Cao Wei who had no associations whatsoever with Cao Cao, personally.  (Under this organization -- which, as you pointed out, has its problems -- I envision [[:Category:Sun Jian and associates]] and [[:Category:Sun Ce and associates]] to be separate categories, for example.  --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 07:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
281268 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281263 +++$+++ 281267 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 08:55:00 +++$+++ 1.176047700E09 +++$+++ Maybe we can just make [[:Category:Dong Zhuo and associates]], [[:Category:Yuan Shao and associates]], etc. and leave Liu Bei, Cao Cao, and Sun Jian alone.  +++$+++ :::::Maybe we can just make [[:Category:Dong Zhuo and associates]], [[:Category:Yuan Shao and associates]], etc. and leave Liu Bei, Cao Cao, and Sun Jian alone. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 08:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
281269 +++$+++ Nlu +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281263 +++$+++ 281268 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.176068520E09 +++$+++ Perhaps.  When I get a chance I'll see whether that whittles the category down sufficiently.  Thanks.  -- +++$+++ ::::::Perhaps.  When I get a chance I'll see whether that whittles the category down sufficiently.  Thanks.  --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 14:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

19123 +++$+++ Android Mouse Bot 2 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19123 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.183550940E09 +++$+++ If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. '''This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate [[:Image:Kevin Eiben in 2005.JPG]] itself'''. Feel free to leave a message [[User talk:Android Mouse|on the bot operator's talk page]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. Thanks. -- +++$+++ If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. '''This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate [[:Image:Kevin Eiben in 2005.JPG]] itself'''. Feel free to leave a message [[User talk:Android Mouse|on the bot operator's talk page]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. Thanks. --[[User:Android Mouse Bot 2|Android Mouse Bot 2]] 05:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
19124 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19123 +++$+++ 19123 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.183551240E09 +++$+++ I do not see any reason for the photo I created and uploaded to be nominated for speedy deletion.  I clearly stated that I took the photograph myself @ an Argos home game in 2005, and that I hearby release it to the public domain.   +++$+++ : I do not see any reason for the photo I created and uploaded to be nominated for speedy deletion.  I clearly stated that I took the photograph myself @ an Argos home game in 2005, and that I hearby release it to the public domain.  [[User:Amchow78|Amchow78]] 05:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

281270 +++$+++ Angr +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-09 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.176163260E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user={{PAGENAMEE}}}} this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags\/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 17:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. \u2014 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user={{PAGENAMEE}}}} this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 17:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. —[[User:Angr|'''An''']][[User talk:Angr|''gr'']] 17:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
281271 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281270 +++$+++ 281270 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.176570120E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, I'm busy preparing for exams and shouldn't be editing for a while. Until then, best of luck.  +++$+++ :I'm sorry, I'm busy preparing for exams and shouldn't be editing for a while. Until then, best of luck. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 10:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

19127 +++$+++ BlueAg09 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-29 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.193727180E09 +++$+++ Hi there, Amchow78. I noticed you added [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Reggie_McNeal&diff=166112114&oldid=164640925 this statement] to the Reggie McNeal article. An [[IP address|IP]] user later removed that statement, which was not true. McNeal is still on the practice roster of the Argonauts, as seen [http:\/\/www.argonauts.ca\/Argos\/Team\/Roster\/home.html here]. I am not sure if it was a mistake or you heard this information from somewhere, but next time, please add legitimate sources when adding such information to articles. Doing so accords with [[WP:V]], one of the policies on Wikipedia. Adding false information, mistakenly or not, can not only be misleading to readers but it may even lower Wikipedia's reputation. Thank you. <span style=\"background-color: navy; color: white\"> +++$+++ Hi there, Amchow78. I noticed you added [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reggie_McNeal&diff=166112114&oldid=164640925 this statement] to the Reggie McNeal article. An [[IP address|IP]] user later removed that statement, which was not true. McNeal is still on the practice roster of the Argonauts, as seen [http://www.argonauts.ca/Argos/Team/Roster/home.html here]. I am not sure if it was a mistake or you heard this information from somewhere, but next time, please add legitimate sources when adding such information to articles. Doing so accords with [[WP:V]], one of the policies on Wikipedia. Adding false information, mistakenly or not, can not only be misleading to readers but it may even lower Wikipedia's reputation. Thank you. <span style="background-color: navy; color: white">[[User:BlueAg09|'''<font color="white">Blue</font>'''</span><span style="background-color: #8C2633; color: white">'''Ag09''']]</span> ([[User talk:BlueAg09|Talk]]) 23:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
19128 +++$+++ BlueAg09 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19127 +++$+++ 19127 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.193740500E09 +++$+++ Okay, now I'm confused. He's not listed on the depth chart, but why isn't he listed as being released on the team's transactions' page [http:\/\/www.argonauts.ca\/Argos\/Team\/transactions.html here]? <span style=\"background-color: navy; color: white\"> +++$+++ :Okay, now I'm confused. He's not listed on the depth chart, but why isn't he listed as being released on the team's transactions' page [http://www.argonauts.ca/Argos/Team/transactions.html here]? <span style="background-color: navy; color: white">[[User:BlueAg09|'''<font color="white">Blue</font>'''</span><span style="background-color: #8C2633; color: white">'''Ag09''']]</span> ([[User talk:BlueAg09|Talk]]) 03:35, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
19129 +++$+++ BlueAg09 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19127 +++$+++ 19128 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.193796060E09 +++$+++ That explains it then. Thanks for clearing that up! <span style=\"background-color: navy; color: white\"> +++$+++ ::That explains it then. Thanks for clearing that up! <span style="background-color: navy; color: white">[[User:BlueAg09|'''<font color="white">Blue</font>'''</span><span style="background-color: #8C2633; color: white">'''Ag09''']]</span> ([[User talk:BlueAg09|Talk]]) 19:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

281272 +++$+++ Nlu +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.176776100E09 +++$+++ After I whittled down [[:Category:Han Dynasty people related to the Three Kingdoms]] as I indicated, there were still over 200 article.  I think I'll have to go with the categories associated with Cao Cao, Sun Ce, and probably Liu Bei and Sun Quan, despite the potential confusion, to cut it down to <200 and hopefully <100, if not <50.  -- +++$+++ After I whittled down [[:Category:Han Dynasty people related to the Three Kingdoms]] as I indicated, there were still over 200 article.  I think I'll have to go with the categories associated with Cao Cao, Sun Ce, and probably Liu Bei and Sun Quan, despite the potential confusion, to cut it down to <200 and hopefully <100, if not <50.  --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 19:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
281273 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281272 +++$+++ 281272 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.176789060E09 +++$+++ You have my support (spiritually).  +++$+++ :You have my support (spiritually). [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
281274 +++$+++ Nlu +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281272 +++$+++ 281273 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.176789420E09 +++$+++ :-)  -- +++$+++ :: :-)  --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 22:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

543417 +++$+++ Googie man +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-03 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.191470640E09 +++$+++ Obviously your warning went completely unheeded.  His edit warring edit was reverted almost immediately, however if he isn't blocked, he'll just do it again.  You can see the edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Reggie_Jackson&action=history here].  I'm completely out of patience with this guy - please help.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Obviously your warning went completely unheeded.  His edit warring edit was reverted almost immediately, however if he isn't blocked, he'll just do it again.  You can see the edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reggie_Jackson&action=history here].  I'm completely out of patience with this guy - please help.  Thanks, [[User:Googie man|Googie man]] 21:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
543418 +++$+++ Googie man +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543417 +++$+++ 543417 +++$+++ 2007-10-04 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.191531720E09 +++$+++ And I just reverted an edit by his sockpuppet, [[User:Jjj222|Jjj222]], doing exactly the same thing that you can see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Reggie_Jackson&action=history here].  So if this doesn't deserve a good blocking, I don't know what does.  Thanks,  +++$+++ :And I just reverted an edit by his sockpuppet, [[User:Jjj222|Jjj222]], doing exactly the same thing that you can see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reggie_Jackson&action=history here].  So if this doesn't deserve a good blocking, I don't know what does.  Thanks, [[User:Googie man|Googie man]] 14:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
543419 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543417 +++$+++ 543418 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.191602100E09 +++$+++ Blocked him\/her for 24h and left an explanation on the talk page. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ ::Blocked him/her for 24h and left an explanation on the talk page. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 09:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
543420 +++$+++ Googie man +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543417 +++$+++ 543419 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.191620760E09 +++$+++ Thank you again.  Hopefully your block will also be effective for this person's sockpuppet.  Best,  +++$+++ :::Thank you again.  Hopefully your block will also be effective for this person's sockpuppet.  Best, [[User:Googie man|Googie man]] 14:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

19130 +++$+++ BlueAg09 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-08 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.202535420E09 +++$+++ Hello again. I just read [http:\/\/www.thestar.com\/Sports\/article\/301654 this article] about [[Damon Allen]]. The article includes that McNeal may be a future starter. What's up with that?  +++$+++ Hello again. I just read [http://www.thestar.com/Sports/article/301654 this article] about [[Damon Allen]]. The article includes that McNeal may be a future starter. What's up with that? [[User:BlueAg09|BlueAg09]] ([[User talk:BlueAg09|Talk]]) 21:37, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
19131 +++$+++ BlueAg09 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19130 +++$+++ 19130 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.202562540E09 +++$+++ Okay, cool. Thanks for the info.  +++$+++ :Okay, cool. Thanks for the info. [[User:BlueAg09|BlueAg09]] ([[User talk:BlueAg09|Talk]]) 05:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
19132 +++$+++ BlueAg09 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19130 +++$+++ 19131 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.206056820E09 +++$+++ It's official -- he has resigned with the Argos. [http:\/\/www.cfl.ca\/index.php?module=newser&func=display&topicnum=&nid=23283&writer=0]  +++$+++ ::It's official -- he has resigned with the Argos. [http://www.cfl.ca/index.php?module=newser&func=display&topicnum=&nid=23283&writer=0] [[User:BlueAg09|BlueAg09]] ([[User talk:BlueAg09|Talk]]) 16:47, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
19133 +++$+++ BlueAg09 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19130 +++$+++ 19132 +++$+++ 2008-06-04 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.212577980E09 +++$+++ Nice picture! I haven't seen one of him since his days with the Bengals.  +++$+++ :::Nice picture! I haven't seen one of him since his days with the Bengals. [[User:BlueAg09|BlueAg09]] ([[User talk:BlueAg09|Talk]]) 04:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

281275 +++$+++ Plastictv +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-20 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.177112940E09 +++$+++ i just feel that up till now we have all been working relatively alone. It might be good to have regular discussions among active and responsible contributors, for both technical and moral supports. Cheers! -- +++$+++ i just feel that up till now we have all been working relatively alone. It might be good to have regular discussions among active and responsible contributors, for both technical and moral supports. Cheers! --[[User:Plastictv|Plastictv]] 16:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
281276 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281275 +++$+++ 281275 +++$+++ 2007-04-23 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.177363440E09 +++$+++ I support your suggestions whole-heartedly, and I'm glad you found your way back to editing :)  +++$+++ :I support your suggestions whole-heartedly, and I'm glad you found your way back to editing :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 14:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
281277 +++$+++ Plastictv +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281275 +++$+++ 281276 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.177421220E09 +++$+++ Thanks! It's nice to be back. i have created the template: [[:Template:Three Kingdoms warning]]. Please take a look and let me know if you think the wordings are okay. Cheers! -- +++$+++ ::Thanks! It's nice to be back. i have created the template: [[:Template:Three Kingdoms warning]]. Please take a look and let me know if you think the wordings are okay. Cheers! --[[User:Plastictv|Plastictv]] 06:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
281278 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281275 +++$+++ 281277 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.177515720E09 +++$+++ It's nice...but I don't think it adequately explains ''why'' fact and fiction could be easily muddled in those articles.  +++$+++ :::It's nice...but I don't think it adequately explains ''why'' fact and fiction could be easily muddled in those articles. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 08:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
281279 +++$+++ Plastictv +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281275 +++$+++ 281278 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.177593660E09 +++$+++ i get what you mean. Hmm... do you have any suggestions? -- +++$+++ ::::i get what you mean. Hmm... do you have any suggestions? --[[User:Plastictv|Plastictv]] 06:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
281280 +++$+++ Plastictv +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281275 +++$+++ 281279 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.177594080E09 +++$+++ i've just changed the wording slightly. See if it's okay now? Cheers! -- +++$+++ :::::i've just changed the wording slightly. See if it's okay now? Cheers! --[[User:Plastictv|Plastictv]] 06:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
281281 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281275 +++$+++ 281280 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 10:15:00 +++$+++ 1.177607700E09 +++$+++ It's great!  +++$+++ ::::::It's great! [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 10:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

527477 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-13 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.171379760E09 +++$+++ I just noticed that the request was \"on hold\" because [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] contacted you saying that he was 'feeling a bit under the weather'. However [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] has been posting frequently since then. I do believe that the mediation should start back up again because right now the Article could use some major edits that might conflict with this mediation. +++$+++ I just noticed that the request was "on hold" because [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] contacted you saying that he was 'feeling a bit under the weather'. However [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] has been posting frequently since then. I do believe that the mediation should start back up again because right now the Article could use some major edits that might conflict with this mediation.[[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 07:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
527478 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527477 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-15 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.171564860E09 +++$+++ User [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] seems to be well now. He said he was feeling 'under the weather' 3 weeks ago and has been contributing often since then. I wanted to see the mediation continue because I wanted to remove the \"POV dispute\" tag from the top of the John Edward article. No one has justified it's being there. +++$+++ ::User [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] seems to be well now. He said he was feeling 'under the weather' 3 weeks ago and has been contributing often since then. I wanted to see the mediation continue because I wanted to remove the "POV dispute" tag from the top of the John Edward article. No one has justified it's being there.[[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 10:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

19137 +++$+++ DoubleBlue +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-07 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.204938960E09 +++$+++ Was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Andre_Talbot&diff=196353184&oldid=196352963 this] done in error or what is your reasoning? I have restored it.  +++$+++ Was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andre_Talbot&diff=196353184&oldid=196352963 this] done in error or what is your reasoning? I have restored it. [[User:DoubleBlue|<font color="darkblue">'''Double'''</font><font color="blue">Blue</font>]] ([[User talk:DoubleBlue|Talk)]] 17:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
19138 +++$+++ DoubleBlue +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19137 +++$+++ 19137 +++$+++ 2008-03-07 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.204941180E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Persondata|Persondata]] is meant to be invisible to users unless they add to their stylesheet the option to see it. I'd like to see his professional career section expanded but don't feel like doing it at the moment. I probably will do at some point. He's one of my faves! Cheers!  +++$+++ *[[Wikipedia:Persondata|Persondata]] is meant to be invisible to users unless they add to their stylesheet the option to see it. I'd like to see his professional career section expanded but don't feel like doing it at the moment. I probably will do at some point. He's one of my faves! Cheers! [[User:DoubleBlue|<font color="darkblue">'''Double'''</font><font color="blue">Blue</font>]] ([[User talk:DoubleBlue|Talk)]] 17:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

281283 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281283 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-27 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.177674360E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ -- [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 04:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
281284 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281283 +++$+++ 281283 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.177675020E09 +++$+++ Wow, I've been thinking about a Three Kingdoms WikiProject as well! and you took the words out of my mouth as well. I would be really happy to help if the project comes to fruitation. :)  +++$+++ :Wow, I've been thinking about a Three Kingdoms WikiProject as well! and you took the words out of my mouth as well. I would be really happy to help if the project comes to fruitation. :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 04:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
281285 +++$+++  +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281283 +++$+++ 281284 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.177676460E09 +++$+++ At the moment I am working on [[Battle of Red Cliffs]]. There's gonna be a [[John Woo]]\/cast of thousands of Hong Kong\/Taiwan pretty faces [[The Battle of Red Cliff (film)|movie]] about it in 2008, and I wanna get at least that article and maybe one or other main ones to FA before that.... I just started working on Red Cliffs and have made good progress but it still needs much work... collaboration, anyone? I've already been able to have a long-term and very successful collaboration w.  +++$+++ ::At the moment I am working on [[Battle of Red Cliffs]]. There's gonna be a [[John Woo]]/cast of thousands of Hong Kong/Taiwan pretty faces [[The Battle of Red Cliff (film)|movie]] about it in 2008, and I wanna get at least that article and maybe one or other main ones to FA before that.... I just started working on Red Cliffs and have made good progress but it still needs much work... collaboration, anyone? I've already been able to have a long-term and very successful collaboration w. [[User:Maowang|Maowang]] on the [[Taiwanese aborigines]] article, and am looking to repeat the success... -- 05:21, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
281286 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281283 +++$+++ 281285 +++$+++ 2007-04-27 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.177676820E09 +++$+++ Yes...I have that page on my watchlist and I see you're doing some very good work on it :). I'll try to contribute  every so often.  +++$+++ :::Yes...I have that page on my watchlist and I see you're doing some very good work on it :). I'll try to contribute  every so often. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 05:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

281288 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-27 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.177731300E09 +++$+++ Hey, [[:Image:Changbanzhizhan.png]] has Xiakou south of the Yangtze. Should be north of it, right?? --  +++$+++ Hey, [[:Image:Changbanzhizhan.png]] has Xiakou south of the Yangtze. Should be north of it, right?? -- [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 20:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
281289 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281288 +++$+++ 281288 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.177754580E09 +++$+++ Chinese geography isn't my forte...I only cropped and translated from this image here [[:Image:Chibizhizhan.png]].  +++$+++ :Chinese geography isn't my forte...I only cropped and translated from this image here [[:Image:Chibizhizhan.png]]. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 03:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
281290 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281288 +++$+++ 281288 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.177754640E09 +++$+++ Ah, sorry about that. I was just being bold :)  +++$+++ :Ah, sorry about that. I was just being bold :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 03:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

19147 +++$+++ DoubleBlue +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-29 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.225277100E09 +++$+++ I know for a fact that it has the players (in the game), coaches, and owners engraved. I took a nice close-up photo of the corrected plaque for the 1991 winners (J Candy, W Gretzky added) but with the flash it was whited out and without it was too dark to see so we can't use that. :-( I cannot find a definitive reliable source better than the one you have either. There are several news stories about correcting the omission of John Candy's name last year but none I could see spell out the fact that all players, coaches, and staff are engraved on it. I'd leave it for now and I'm sure we'll find irrefutable proof soon enough.  +++$+++ I know for a fact that it has the players (in the game), coaches, and owners engraved. I took a nice close-up photo of the corrected plaque for the 1991 winners (J Candy, W Gretzky added) but with the flash it was whited out and without it was too dark to see so we can't use that. :-( I cannot find a definitive reliable source better than the one you have either. There are several news stories about correcting the omission of John Candy's name last year but none I could see spell out the fact that all players, coaches, and staff are engraved on it. I'd leave it for now and I'm sure we'll find irrefutable proof soon enough. [[User:DoubleBlue|<font color="darkblue">'''Double'''</font><font color="blue">Blue</font>]] ([[User talk:DoubleBlue|Talk)]] 03:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
19148 +++$+++ DoubleBlue +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19147 +++$+++ 19147 +++$+++ 2008-11-05 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.225879920E09 +++$+++ I think she meant ''does not'' include club staff but that's not significantly different than the Stanley Cup. I think maybe Stanley includes trainers. Cheers!  +++$+++ :I think she meant ''does not'' include club staff but that's not significantly different than the Stanley Cup. I think maybe Stanley includes trainers. Cheers! [[User:DoubleBlue|<font color="darkblue">'''Double'''</font><font color="blue">Blue</font>]] ([[User talk:DoubleBlue|Talk)]] 02:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

543436 +++$+++ Kingjeff +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-26 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.180177680E09 +++$+++ Do you agree with me about [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Owen_Hargreaves&diff=133534828&oldid=133527435 this] being nothing but speculation or even lying?  +++$+++ Do you agree with me about [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Owen_Hargreaves&diff=133534828&oldid=133527435 this] being nothing but speculation or even lying? [[User:Kingjeff|Kingjeff]] 04:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
543437 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543436 +++$+++ 543436 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.180178340E09 +++$+++ Quite frankly, I have no idea ;-) I protected the article due to obvious disputive edits but am not familiar with Owen Hargreaves myself-sorry. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Quite frankly, I have no idea ;-) I protected the article due to obvious disputive edits but am not familiar with Owen Hargreaves myself-sorry. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

19150 +++$+++ Iamawesome800 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-06 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.231301520E09 +++$+++ What were you doing there? He's on the Texans, not the Argonauts cause he was signed by the Texans to a future contract (which means he's a prospect it doesn't mean it's about to happen).--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE --><font face=\"tahoma\"> +++$+++ What were you doing there? He's on the Texans, not the Argonauts cause he was signed by the Texans to a future contract (which means he's a prospect it doesn't mean it's about to happen).--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE --><font face="tahoma">[[User:Iamawesome800|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:White">Iamawesome</span>''']][[User talk:Iamawesome800|'''<span style="background:Red;color:White">800</span>''']]</font><!-- END --> 20:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
19151 +++$+++ Iamawesome800 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19150 +++$+++ 19150 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.231302420E09 +++$+++ I know that but he was signed last week per:http:\/\/www.houstontexans.com\/team\/Roster.html, check in the W's he's there.--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE --><font face=\"tahoma\"> +++$+++ :I know that but he was signed last week per:http://www.houstontexans.com/team/Roster.html, check in the W's he's there.--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE --><font face="tahoma">[[User:Iamawesome800|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:White">Iamawesome</span>''']][[User talk:Iamawesome800|'''<span style="background:Red;color:White">800</span>''']]</font><!-- END --> 20:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
19152 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19150 +++$+++ 19151 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.231302780E09 +++$+++ I now see what you mean.  What I'll do, then, is make a note about the nature of [[Cliff Washburn|his]] signing with the Texans, combined with a citation to avoid further confusions. +++$+++ ::I now see what you mean.  What I'll do, then, is make a note about the nature of [[Cliff Washburn|his]] signing with the Texans, combined with a citation to avoid further confusions.[[User:Amchow78|Amchow78]] ([[User talk:Amchow78#top|talk]]) 20:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
19153 +++$+++ Iamawesome800 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19150 +++$+++ 19152 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.231302900E09 +++$+++ Yeah you're right cause people can see that he was released by the Texans on the 31st but since there's no mention of him re-signing then something like this could happen again.--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE --><font face=\"tahoma\"> +++$+++ :::Yeah you're right cause people can see that he was released by the Texans on the 31st but since there's no mention of him re-signing then something like this could happen again.--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE --><font face="tahoma">[[User:Iamawesome800|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:White">Iamawesome</span>''']][[User talk:Iamawesome800|'''<span style="background:Red;color:White">800</span>''']]</font><!-- END --> 20:35, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
19154 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19150 +++$+++ 19153 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.231305120E09 +++$+++ Hmm ... I am not too familiar with the concept of the reserve\/future contract, but I think I got the gist of how it works based on the Buccaneers' website.[http:\/\/www.buccaneers.com\/news\/newsdetail.aspx?newsid=4976]  It says that the upcoming season doesn't officially start until March.  I'm assuming that it means that there is a freeze on officially signing free agents until then, except for a select few that meet the criteria of being signed to this type of contract. The contract would then decree that they will officially become a member of that team when March comes around.  If my assumption is correct, then that would explain why Washburn is still listed as an active member of the Toronto Argonauts.  Did I pretty much get the concept of the reserve\/future contract correctly? +++$+++ ::::Hmm ... I am not too familiar with the concept of the reserve/future contract, but I think I got the gist of how it works based on the Buccaneers' website.[http://www.buccaneers.com/news/newsdetail.aspx?newsid=4976]  It says that the upcoming season doesn't officially start until March.  I'm assuming that it means that there is a freeze on officially signing free agents until then, except for a select few that meet the criteria of being signed to this type of contract. The contract would then decree that they will officially become a member of that team when March comes around.  If my assumption is correct, then that would explain why Washburn is still listed as an active member of the Toronto Argonauts.  Did I pretty much get the concept of the reserve/future contract correctly?[[User:Amchow78|Amchow78]] ([[User talk:Amchow78#top|talk]]) 21:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
19155 +++$+++ Iamawesome800 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19150 +++$+++ 19154 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.231308720E09 +++$+++ I'm pretty sure you're right but you might want to ask either [[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Chrisjnelson]] or [[User talk:Pats1|Pats1]] as they'll know more into the details of the future contract.--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE --><font face=\"tahoma\"> +++$+++ :::::I'm pretty sure you're right but you might want to ask either [[User talk:Chrisjnelson|Chrisjnelson]] or [[User talk:Pats1|Pats1]] as they'll know more into the details of the future contract.--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE --><font face="tahoma">[[User:Iamawesome800|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:White">Iamawesome</span>''']][[User talk:Iamawesome800|'''<span style="background:Red;color:White">800</span>''']]</font><!-- END --> 22:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

543439 +++$+++ Musicpvm +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-26 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.180244880E09 +++$+++ Hey, the same user has started to use yet another sockpuppet ({{IPuser|75.45.72.145}}) to vandalize this article.  I was wondering if it would be possible to block this IP address as well.  Thanks.  -- +++$+++ Hey, the same user has started to use yet another sockpuppet ({{IPuser|75.45.72.145}}) to vandalize this article.  I was wondering if it would be possible to block this IP address as well.  Thanks.  --[[User:Musicpvm|musicpvm]] 22:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
543440 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543439 +++$+++ 543439 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.180262100E09 +++$+++ I have protected the article for two days as he\/she keeps evading blocks through creating new anon sockpuppets. Perhaps in two days this vandal will lose interest. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I have protected the article for two days as he/she keeps evading blocks through creating new anon sockpuppets. Perhaps in two days this vandal will lose interest. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 03:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

281297 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-02 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.178099700E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 02:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
281298 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281297 +++$+++ 281297 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.178105160E09 +++$+++ You forgot to label Wulin, mislabeled Baqiu, and misspelled Hanjin. My original intention was to separate the Battle of Changban and the Battle of Red Cliffs...but I guess this is fine.  +++$+++ :You forgot to label Wulin, mislabeled Baqiu, and misspelled Hanjin. My original intention was to separate the Battle of Changban and the Battle of Red Cliffs...but I guess this is fine. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 04:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
281299 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281297 +++$+++ 281298 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.178106660E09 +++$+++ Err, okay, I see what you're doing with Baqiu. I still suggest using the name \"Baqiu\" though, since the texts at that time almost always call the place Baqiu.  +++$+++ ::Err, okay, I see what you're doing with Baqiu. I still suggest using the name "Baqiu" though, since the texts at that time almost always call the place Baqiu. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 04:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
281300 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281297 +++$+++ 281299 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.178120580E09 +++$+++ de Crespigny  has Baqiu as Hanchang... but  am changing... remembered Wulin ten seconds after I turned off computer...  +++$+++ ::*de Crespigny  has Baqiu as Hanchang... but  am changing... remembered Wulin ten seconds after I turned off computer... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 08:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
281301 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281297 +++$+++ 281299 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.178121360E09 +++$+++ Also.. yes.. between 1969 and 2004 de Crespigny stopped using the term \"Lieutenant Chancellor\" and started using \"Imperial Chancellor.\"  +++$+++ ::* Also.. yes.. between 1969 and 2004 de Crespigny stopped using the term "Lieutenant Chancellor" and started using "Imperial Chancellor." [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 08:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
281302 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281297 +++$+++ 281297 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.178122380E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ * Thanks! [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 09:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
281303 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281297 +++$+++ 281299 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.178153700E09 +++$+++ Great, thanks for your good work!  +++$+++ :::Great, thanks for your good work! [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 17:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

19156 +++$+++ Iamawesome800 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19156 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-03 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.233721020E09 +++$+++ Noticed you added [[P. K. Sam]], [[Cliff Washburn]] and [[Byron Parker]] to the deferred list. Would that be the same for [[Kenny Onatolu]], [[Charleston Hughes]] and others?--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE -->''' +++$+++ Noticed you added [[P. K. Sam]], [[Cliff Washburn]] and [[Byron Parker]] to the deferred list. Would that be the same for [[Kenny Onatolu]], [[Charleston Hughes]] and others?--<!-- BEGIN SIGNATURE -->'''[[User:Iamawesome800|<span style="font-arial:small-caps; color:Black">Iamawesome800</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Iamawesome800|<span style="font-tahoma:small-caps; color:#FFC12D">Talk to Me</span>]]</small>'''<!-- END --> 20:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
19157 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19156 +++$+++ 19156 +++$+++ 2009-02-03 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.233724920E09 +++$+++ The format I went with is in accordance with the terminology used on the [http:\/\/www.argonauts.ca\/page\/transactions_68611 Argonauts' transaction page] with respect to those three players, who happened to have signed reserve\/future contracts with NFL teams.  I would ''assume'', then, that the same would also apply to the other players that you noted. +++$+++ :The format I went with is in accordance with the terminology used on the [http://www.argonauts.ca/page/transactions_68611 Argonauts' transaction page] with respect to those three players, who happened to have signed reserve/future contracts with NFL teams.  I would ''assume'', then, that the same would also apply to the other players that you noted.[[User:Amchow78|Amchow78]] ([[User talk:Amchow78#top|talk]]) 21:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

19158 +++$+++ Giants27 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19158 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-29 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.246332000E09 +++$+++ Hey, I noticed you added an asterik next to his current time with Argos, usually I only add an asterik when their time with the team is over.--[[User talk:Giants27|<font face=\"Bauhaus 93\" color=\"black\" size=\"3\">Giants27<\/font>]] (<span>[[Special:Contributions\/Giants27|<font color=\"black\">c<\/font>]]| +++$+++ Hey, I noticed you added an asterik next to his current time with Argos, usually I only add an asterik when their time with the team is over.--[[User talk:Giants27|<font face="Bauhaus 93" color="black" size="3">Giants27</font>]] (<span>[[Special:Contributions/Giants27|<font color="black">c</font>]]|[[User:Giants27/guestbook|<font color="black">s</font>]]) 20:20, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
19159 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19158 +++$+++ 19158 +++$+++ 2009-06-29 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.246332240E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I did that just based on my interpretation of the criteria stated on the asterisk legend.  It makes no difference to me which way it is showed to be honest.  If you prefer it to be presented in accordance with your interpretation, I've no problem with it.  +++$+++ :Yeah, I did that just based on my interpretation of the criteria stated on the asterisk legend.  It makes no difference to me which way it is showed to be honest.  If you prefer it to be presented in accordance with your interpretation, I've no problem with it. [[User:Amchow78|Amchow78]] 20:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

281304 +++$+++ Sumple +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-04 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.178288580E09 +++$+++ Hey, I've been working on [[Forbidden City]] recently, and I wonder if you could take a look at the present state of the article? Any suggestions for further improvement is appreciated. If you could make any edits, that would be even better. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hey, I've been working on [[Forbidden City]] recently, and I wonder if you could take a look at the present state of the article? Any suggestions for further improvement is appreciated. If you could make any edits, that would be even better. Thanks, [[User:Sumple|Sumple]] ([[User_Talk:Sumple|Talk]]) 07:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
281305 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281304 +++$+++ 281304 +++$+++ 2007-05-07 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.178534940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ * [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 03:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

543450 +++$+++ 24.63.96.152 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-02 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.183410900E09 +++$+++ Wrong again. All you had to do was look at the articles history and you would have seen the vandalism. The statement \"no evidence was provided to link anon IP edits to sockpuppets of any banned user.\" is absolutely laughable, it was coming from the same ip range as a sock puppet ip that was blocked, and all the edits were to the same articles that the head sock puppet vandalised. Are you bliind? How could you not see this? +++$+++ Wrong again. All you had to do was look at the articles history and you would have seen the vandalism. The statement "no evidence was provided to link anon IP edits to sockpuppets of any banned user." is absolutely laughable, it was coming from the same ip range as a sock puppet ip that was blocked, and all the edits were to the same articles that the head sock puppet vandalised. Are you bliind? How could you not see this?[[User:24.63.96.152|24.63.96.152]] 14:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
543451 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543450 +++$+++ 543450 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.183424280E09 +++$+++ No you are wrong. I did look at the history and could not find any case of obvious vandalism. I saw a user adding some genres I have never even heard of to a list of generes I have never even heard of. There was no obvious vandalism - the edits I saw could have been conducted in good faith. Second, just becuase two addresses are similar doesn't mean they represent the same person. There simply was not enough properly documented eveidence to warrant protection of these article and block some of the IPs. Besdies, the reports were filed in a highly improper manner - coming to an admins talk page and saying \"here... block this IP because he's a vandal\" is the equivalent of going to the police saying \"arrest that guy he's a criminal\" - Unless there's properly documented evidence no action is going to be taken. That properly documented evidence was missing.  I am also quite frankly tired of your aggressive tone. I am suspecting that you are Hopnop69 and are trying to air your greivances here using anon IP addresses - I have filed a report at the appropriate noticeboard. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :No you are wrong. I did look at the history and could not find any case of obvious vandalism. I saw a user adding some genres I have never even heard of to a list of generes I have never even heard of. There was no obvious vandalism - the edits I saw could have been conducted in good faith. Second, just becuase two addresses are similar doesn't mean they represent the same person. There simply was not enough properly documented eveidence to warrant protection of these article and block some of the IPs. Besdies, the reports were filed in a highly improper manner - coming to an admins talk page and saying "here... block this IP because he's a vandal" is the equivalent of going to the police saying "arrest that guy he's a criminal" - Unless there's properly documented evidence no action is going to be taken. That properly documented evidence was missing.  I am also quite frankly tired of your aggressive tone. I am suspecting that you are Hopnop69 and are trying to air your greivances here using anon IP addresses - I have filed a report at the appropriate noticeboard. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 17:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

19163 +++$+++ Gcapp1959 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-09 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.270845840E09 +++$+++ Any insight as to your source would be welcome.  I might have very slightly piqued Stacie's interest in where the 1972 date comes from.  +++$+++ Any insight as to your source would be welcome.  I might have very slightly piqued Stacie's interest in where the 1972 date comes from. [[User:Gcapp1959|GBC]] ([[User talk:Gcapp1959|talk]]) 13:44, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
19164 +++$+++ Gcapp1959 +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19163 +++$+++ 19163 +++$+++ 2010-04-11 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.270970100E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much!  I suspect that Emma either mis-read or mis-spoke in her enthusiasm.  I haven't seen more than 70% of the Next Gen episodes, including that very first episode, so maybe a starry-eyed Emma was looking at Caitlin in admiration to make Caitlin four years older than she really was (e.g. 29 instead of 25).  Caitlin, diplomatically, lived with it!  In any case, at least it didn't get uttered by an \"official\" or seen on an official document of some time.  +++$+++ :Thank you very much!  I suspect that Emma either mis-read or mis-spoke in her enthusiasm.  I haven't seen more than 70% of the Next Gen episodes, including that very first episode, so maybe a starry-eyed Emma was looking at Caitlin in admiration to make Caitlin four years older than she really was (e.g. 29 instead of 25).  Caitlin, diplomatically, lived with it!  In any case, at least it didn't get uttered by an "official" or seen on an official document of some time. [[User:Gcapp1959|GBC]] ([[User talk:Gcapp1959|talk]]) 00:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

19167 +++$+++ aineolach +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19167 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-02 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.272859620E09 +++$+++ For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|for biographies]], [[WP:WEB|for web sites]], [[WP:BAND|for bands]], or [[WP:CORP|for companies]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn -->  '''aineolach''' <small>( +++$+++ For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|for biographies]], [[WP:WEB|for web sites]], [[WP:BAND|for bands]], or [[WP:CORP|for companies]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn -->  '''aineolach''' <small>([[User:Aineolach|u]]<span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span> [[User talk:Aineolach|d]]<span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span> [[special:Contributions/Aineolach|c]])</small> 21:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
19168 +++$+++ aineolach +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19167 +++$+++ 19167 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.272860520E09 +++$+++ Just realized the only thing you did on the page was to set it up originally as a redirect so this notification may strike you as a little odd. '''aineolach''' <small>( +++$+++ :Just realized the only thing you did on the page was to set it up originally as a redirect so this notification may strike you as a little odd. '''aineolach''' <small>([[User:Aineolach|u]]<span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span> [[User talk:Aineolach|d]]<span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span> [[special:Contributions/Aineolach|c]])</small> 21:22, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

281312 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281312 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-19 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.179637860E09 +++$+++ (undent) Ye Gods, this is much worse than I thought! No mere mortal could clean this singlehandedly! Where is [[Zhuge Liang]] when we need him? ;-)  +++$+++ (undent) Ye Gods, this is much worse than I thought! No mere mortal could clean this singlehandedly! Where is [[Zhuge Liang]] when we need him? ;-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 22:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
281313 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281312 +++$+++ 281312 +++$+++ 2007-05-20 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.179646680E09 +++$+++ A rewrite might be easier, I think.  +++$+++ :A rewrite might be easier, I think. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 00:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

19170 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-20 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.277034300E09 +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice -->  +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 04:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
19171 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Amchow78 +++$+++ 19170 +++$+++ 19170 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 04:13:00 +++$+++ 1.296216780E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing![[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  04:13, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

281318 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-18 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.179481200E09 +++$+++ Yeah man, feel free to merge all that stuff from [[Ma Jun]]'s article into the [[South Pointing Chariot]] article instead. I kind of went off on a tangent there with Ma's article. Lol.-- +++$+++ Yeah man, feel free to merge all that stuff from [[Ma Jun]]'s article into the [[South Pointing Chariot]] article instead. I kind of went off on a tangent there with Ma's article. Lol.--[[User:PericlesofAthens|PericlesofAthens]] 02:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
281319 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281318 +++$+++ 281318 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.179496680E09 +++$+++ Hm yea, thanks for reminding me. I didn't get around to doing that because of real life.  +++$+++ :Hm yea, thanks for reminding me. I didn't get around to doing that because of real life. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 06:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
281320 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281318 +++$+++ 281318 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.179644160E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ * [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 23:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

19177 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Bunnyhop11 +++$+++ 19177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-27 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.214614020E09 +++$+++ you have been popping up on a lot of my book marked ([[watch]]) pages.  If you post something, anything, on your user page then your name will appear in [[blue]] instead of [[reddd|red]] and you will find, maybe, that you and your posting are viewed in a less suspicious light.   Feel free to ask what I am talking about if you don't get it.  Life is supposed to be interesting.  Einar aka  +++$+++ you have been popping up on a lot of my book marked ([[watch]]) pages.  If you post something, anything, on your user page then your name will appear in [[blue]] instead of [[reddd|red]] and you will find, maybe, that you and your posting are viewed in a less suspicious light.   Feel free to ask what I am talking about if you don't get it.  Life is supposed to be interesting.  Einar aka [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] ([[User talk:Carptrash|talk]]) 17:47, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
19178 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Bunnyhop11 +++$+++ 19177 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-28 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.214721780E09 +++$+++ Thanks.   +++$+++ ::Thanks.  [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] ([[User talk:Carptrash|talk]]) 23:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

19179 +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ Bunnyhop11 +++$+++ 19179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-01 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.214939880E09 +++$+++ I notice you've been adding some tags to this page.  When looking at it myself I've noticed that the entire page contents were changed from a notable football player to an unnotable engineer a couple of weeks ago (which no one had previously picked up on) so I've reverted it back to that page.  Hope you're OK with this.   +++$+++ I notice you've been adding some tags to this page.  When looking at it myself I've noticed that the entire page contents were changed from a notable football player to an unnotable engineer a couple of weeks ago (which no one had previously picked up on) so I've reverted it back to that page.  Hope you're OK with this.  [[User:Dpmuk|Dpmuk]] ([[User talk:Dpmuk|talk]]) 12:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
19180 +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ Bunnyhop11 +++$+++ 19179 +++$+++ 19179 +++$+++ 2008-07-01 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.214940000E09 +++$+++ Ignore that - just noticed that you just did that before I got a chance!  +++$+++ :Ignore that - just noticed that you just did that before I got a chance! [[User:Dpmuk|Dpmuk]] ([[User talk:Dpmuk|talk]]) 12:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
19181 +++$+++ Spacepotato +++$+++ Bunnyhop11 +++$+++ 19179 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-19 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.216515780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Spacepotato|Spacepotato]] ([[User talk:Spacepotato|talk]]) 18:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

543468 +++$+++ Googie man +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-19 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.184838960E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks, [[User:Googie man|Googie man]] 02:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
543469 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543468 +++$+++ 543468 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 04:20:00 +++$+++ 1.184844000E09 +++$+++ I have issued him\/her his\/her third block due to edit warring and personal attacks. This should resolve the issue, if it doesn't let me know. Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :I have issued him/her his/her third block due to edit warring and personal attacks. This should resolve the issue, if it doesn't let me know. Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 04:20, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
543470 +++$+++ Googie man +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543468 +++$+++ 543469 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.184880840E09 +++$+++ Thank you BrendelSignature!   +++$+++ ::Thank you BrendelSignature!  [[User:Googie man|Googie man]] 14:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

524381 +++$+++ U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.189819620E09 +++$+++ I said one day because I only saw him a lot at RfA, but not so much at other departments, such as [[WP:CHU]], and his interests didn't seem to be focused on that as much. Basically, I thought all he needed was experiance in other bureaucrat backlogs, and more time, and he would be fully qualifed.-- +++$+++ I said one day because I only saw him a lot at RfA, but not so much at other departments, such as [[WP:CHU]], and his interests didn't seem to be focused on that as much. Basically, I thought all he needed was experiance in other bureaucrat backlogs, and more time, and he would be fully qualifed.--[[User:U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A.|U.S.A.]] ('''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A.&amp;action=edit&amp;section=new<small>talk</small>]''' [[Special:Contributions/U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A.|<small>contribs</small>]]) 18:27, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
524382 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524381 +++$+++ 524381 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.190063220E09 +++$+++ Heh, don't worry. I gather you just don't know about NYB yet. Brad is, for good reason, one of the most popular admins we have. You can see him on the short list at [[WP:200#Requests_for_adminship]], but will have to look further to see that he not only had over 200 supports, but fewer opposes than anyone else on that list. He's a deep and careful thinker, and has never been known to write a word in anger, even though he does get involved in important and sometimes heated issues. -- +++$+++ : Heh, don't worry. I gather you just don't know about NYB yet. Brad is, for good reason, one of the most popular admins we have. You can see him on the short list at [[WP:200#Requests_for_adminship]], but will have to look further to see that he not only had over 200 supports, but fewer opposes than anyone else on that list. He's a deep and careful thinker, and has never been known to write a word in anger, even though he does get involved in important and sometimes heated issues. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 14:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

19183 +++$+++ Uncia +++$+++ Bunnyhop11 +++$+++ 19183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-09 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.218334560E09 +++$+++ Hello! When making a change, please provide an [[edit summary]]. This helps other editors understand your change and keeps Wikipedia running smoothly. I notice that many of your changes are fixing spellings or disambiguating; your summary can be just \"spelling\" or \"dab\". Also please note the [[minor edit]] checkbox underneath the edit summary; if your change is minor, such as fixing spelling or links, it also helps other editors to mark the edit as minor. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Hello! When making a change, please provide an [[edit summary]]. This helps other editors understand your change and keeps Wikipedia running smoothly. I notice that many of your changes are fixing spellings or disambiguating; your summary can be just "spelling" or "dab". Also please note the [[minor edit]] checkbox underneath the edit summary; if your change is minor, such as fixing spelling or links, it also helps other editors to mark the edit as minor. Thanks. --[[User:Uncia|Uncia]] ([[User talk:Uncia|talk]]) 19:16, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
19184 +++$+++ Cbl62 +++$+++ Bunnyhop11 +++$+++ 19183 +++$+++ 19183 +++$+++ 2008-09-20 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.221952140E09 +++$+++ Hi.  You made some changes in articles I have on watchlist recently. Your changes were in the nature of spelling changes that are much appreciated.  Per the note vrom Uncia, it would be helpful if you included an edit summary (something as simple as \"spelling\"); that way, when someone has the article on their watchlist they can see right away that it's ok and they don't have to pull up the changes to review in detail.   +++$+++ : Hi.  You made some changes in articles I have on watchlist recently. Your changes were in the nature of spelling changes that are much appreciated.  Per the note vrom Uncia, it would be helpful if you included an edit summary (something as simple as "spelling"); that way, when someone has the article on their watchlist they can see right away that it's ok and they don't have to pull up the changes to review in detail.  [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 16:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
19185 +++$+++ Sanfranman59 +++$+++ Bunnyhop11 +++$+++ 19183 +++$+++ 19184 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.224714180E09 +++$+++ I'll add to the chorus here. You're still not including edit summaries. Please get in the habit of doing so. It requires little effort and it's very helpful to other editors. -- +++$+++ ::I'll add to the chorus here. You're still not including edit summaries. Please get in the habit of doing so. It requires little effort and it's very helpful to other editors. --[[User:Sanfranman59|Sanfranman59]] ([[User talk:Sanfranman59|talk]]) 15:23, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

281329 +++$+++ Zaku Two +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281329 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-25 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.180093500E09 +++$+++ I've added rationales to the affected images; you may want to check everything over, though.  +++$+++ I've added rationales to the affected images; you may want to check everything over, though. [[User:Zaku_Two|Zaku]]<sup>[[User talk:Zaku Two|Talk]]</sup> 04:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
281330 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281329 +++$+++ 281329 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.180102560E09 +++$+++ Thank you very, very much.  +++$+++ :Thank you very, very much. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 07:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
281331 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281329 +++$+++ 281329 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.180145820E09 +++$+++ If interested in WikiProject Three Kingdoms, please add your name to the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council\/Proposals#Three Kingdoms|project proposal]]''' to show support. It may encourage others to join.  +++$+++ * If interested in WikiProject Three Kingdoms, please add your name to the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Three Kingdoms|project proposal]]''' to show support. It may encourage others to join. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 19:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

543476 +++$+++ Dailynetworks +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543476 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-25 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.188110220E09 +++$+++ Could you please remove that controversial first sentence in this article and lock the article until consensus can be reached.  The tug of war is continuing and it is really embarrassing for the article and Wikipedia.  Thanks. ''' +++$+++ Could you please remove that controversial first sentence in this article and lock the article until consensus can be reached.  The tug of war is continuing and it is really embarrassing for the article and Wikipedia.  Thanks. '''[[User:Dailynetworks|<font color="mediumblue">Mark</font> @ <font color="green">DailyNetworks</font>]]''' [[User_talk:Dailynetworks|<small>talk</small>]] 23:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
543477 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543476 +++$+++ 543476 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.188133500E09 +++$+++ Protecting the page has occured to me but I only want to lock such a high-profile article as a last resort. I have given the editors one more chance to stop the reverting and find consensus on the talk page. If the edit warring continues, I will protect the article. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Protecting the page has occured to me but I only want to lock such a high-profile article as a last resort. I have given the editors one more chance to stop the reverting and find consensus on the talk page. If the edit warring continues, I will protect the article. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 06:05, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
543478 +++$+++ Dailynetworks +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543476 +++$+++ 543477 +++$+++ 2007-08-26 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.188151680E09 +++$+++ Thanks!!  I think you are right.  Hopefully the editors can reach consensus.  I appreciate your help. ''' +++$+++ ::Thanks!!  I think you are right.  Hopefully the editors can reach consensus.  I appreciate your help. '''[[User:Dailynetworks|<font color="mediumblue">Mark</font> @ <font color="green">DailyNetworks</font>]]''' [[User_talk:Dailynetworks|<small>talk</small>]] 11:08, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

281333 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-28 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.180338420E09 +++$+++ Changes made as per your request. See [[Guan Yu]] for an extreme example. Ranks can be highest achieved; there can even be an option to put two values for \"Empire\" in the case of individuals who served for a prolonged period under more than one... Thanks!  +++$+++ Changes made as per your request. See [[Guan Yu]] for an extreme example. Ranks can be highest achieved; there can even be an option to put two values for "Empire" in the case of individuals who served for a prolonged period under more than one... Thanks! [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 00:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
281334 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281333 +++$+++ 281333 +++$+++ 2007-05-28 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.180411620E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your input... Cheers!  +++$+++ *  I appreciate your input... Cheers! [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 21:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
281335 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281333 +++$+++ 281333 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.180427340E09 +++$+++ I fear two parameters for \"served\" is not enough, Mi Fang has three since he first served [[Tao Qian (Three Kingdoms)|Tao Qian]], and there are many many instances like his.  +++$+++ :I fear two parameters for "served" is not enough, Mi Fang has three since he first served [[Tao Qian (Three Kingdoms)|Tao Qian]], and there are many many instances like his. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 01:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
281336 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281333 +++$+++ 281335 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.180429560E09 +++$+++ OK. The point is simply that modifications\/extensions are not difficult to do, esp. since we have all code in a single location (read: it's a template, not a table).  +++$+++ ::OK. The point is simply that modifications/extensions are not difficult to do, esp. since we have all code in a single location (read: it's a template, not a table). [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 02:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

46889 +++$+++ TGCP +++$+++ Born2flie +++$+++ 46889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-18 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.295421720E09 +++$+++ First flight of the PAV occurred on 5 January 2011, and lasted 36 minutes.<ref>http:\/\/www.generalaviationnews.com\/?p=34512<\/ref><ref>http:\/\/www.aero-news.net\/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=8b4377da-979c-4c52-9da4-7199c4251ebe&<\/ref> Does that qualify the PAV article for publishing by moving it into mainspace?  +++$+++ First flight of the PAV occurred on 5 January 2011, and lasted 36 minutes.<ref>http://www.generalaviationnews.com/?p=34512</ref><ref>http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=8b4377da-979c-4c52-9da4-7199c4251ebe&</ref> Does that qualify the PAV article for publishing by moving it into mainspace? [[User:TGCP|TGCP]] ([[User talk:TGCP|talk]]) 23:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
46890 +++$+++ TGCP +++$+++ Born2flie +++$+++ 46889 +++$+++ 46889 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.295422200E09 +++$+++ Hmm, so far rehashes of the [http:\/\/www.cartercopters.com\/pr_2011-01-17.html PR] are to be found.  +++$+++ :Hmm, so far rehashes of the [http://www.cartercopters.com/pr_2011-01-17.html PR] are to be found. [[User:TGCP|TGCP]] ([[User talk:TGCP|talk]]) 23:30, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
46891 +++$+++ Born2flie +++$+++ Born2flie +++$+++ 46889 +++$+++ 46890 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.295594880E09 +++$+++ I would say that it is enough to incubate the article so more editors have access to it. -- +++$+++ ::I would say that it is enough to incubate the article so more editors have access to it. --[[User:Born2flie|Born2flie]] ([[User talk:Born2flie#top|talk]]) 23:28, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

281337 +++$+++ Phil Boswell +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-30 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.180543560E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ —[[User:Phil Boswell|Phil]] | [[User talk:Phil Boswell|Talk]] 09:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
281338 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281337 +++$+++ 281337 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.180549740E09 +++$+++ Admins are also editors, the fact that you two are admins doesn't mean you can sidestep discussion (and using harsh language on my talk page no less). However, since I have no real ties with the article, I may just leave it alone as you said.  +++$+++ :Admins are also editors, the fact that you two are admins doesn't mean you can sidestep discussion (and using harsh language on my talk page no less). However, since I have no real ties with the article, I may just leave it alone as you said. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 11:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

19195 +++$+++ Andrew Jameson +++$+++ Bunnyhop11 +++$+++ 19195 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.311981780E09 +++$+++ The two properties you removed from [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Grand Traverse County, Michigan]] (Dougherty Mission House and Stickney Summer House-Bowers Harbor Inn) were both added to the National Register of Historic Places on April 8, 2011 ([http:\/\/www.nps.gov\/history\/nr\/listings\/20110415.htm here's the weekly list from the National Park Service] verifying same).  I presume the resource you were using to cross-check the information was not up-to-date.  You might be using the State of Michigan's [http:\/\/www.mcgi.state.mi.us\/hso\/advancematch.asp?&cname=&ctype=county&cnty=Grand+Traverse&srl=ON Historic Sites Online]; if you are, be aware that the information on that site has not (as far as I can tell) been updated since about 2005.  +++$+++ The two properties you removed from [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Grand Traverse County, Michigan]] (Dougherty Mission House and Stickney Summer House-Bowers Harbor Inn) were both added to the National Register of Historic Places on April 8, 2011 ([http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/listings/20110415.htm here's the weekly list from the National Park Service] verifying same).  I presume the resource you were using to cross-check the information was not up-to-date.  You might be using the State of Michigan's [http://www.mcgi.state.mi.us/hso/advancematch.asp?&cname=&ctype=county&cnty=Grand+Traverse&srl=ON Historic Sites Online]; if you are, be aware that the information on that site has not (as far as I can tell) been updated since about 2005. [[User:Andrew Jameson|Andrew Jameson]] ([[User talk:Andrew Jameson|talk]]) 16:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
19196 +++$+++ Bunnyhop11 +++$+++ Bunnyhop11 +++$+++ 19195 +++$+++ 19195 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312064640E09 +++$+++ Sorry, you're right!   +++$+++ :Sorry, you're right!  [[User:Bunnyhop11|Bunnyhop11]] ([[User talk:Bunnyhop11#top|talk]]) 15:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

281342 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281342 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-01 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.180753920E09 +++$+++ ...passed GA and is now at MILHIST A-class assessment: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history\/Assessment\/Battle of Red Cliffs]]. Hopefully, next stop is [[WP:FAC]]. When we go to FAC, I'm gonna put your name in as co-nominator, if that's OK with you...  +++$+++ ...passed GA and is now at MILHIST A-class assessment: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Battle of Red Cliffs]]. Hopefully, next stop is [[WP:FAC]]. When we go to FAC, I'm gonna put your name in as co-nominator, if that's OK with you... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 20:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
281343 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281342 +++$+++ 281342 +++$+++ 2007-06-01 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.180761240E09 +++$+++ I'd be honoured. Thanks.  +++$+++ :I'd be honoured. Thanks. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
281344 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281342 +++$+++ 281343 +++$+++ 2007-06-03 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.180918080E09 +++$+++ See my comment on the page's Talk about your suggestion of a \"Modern references\" section... I think it's a good idea but would wanna write  it in userpsace to avoid hosing up the article...then add it fully-formed... what do you think? -- +++$+++ ::See my comment on the page's Talk about your suggestion of a "Modern references" section... I think it's a good idea but would wanna write  it in userpsace to avoid hosing up the article...then add it fully-formed... what do you think? --[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 17:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
281345 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281342 +++$+++ 281344 +++$+++ 2007-06-03 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.180928940E09 +++$+++ That would be wise. =)  +++$+++ :::That would be wise. =) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 20:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
281346 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281342 +++$+++ 281345 +++$+++ 2007-06-03 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.180932540E09 +++$+++ After giving it more thought, I think we could merge this proposed section with \"Fictionalized account\", making a \"Cultural references\" section of sorts, so we can write about the literary developments before and after the novel.  +++$+++ ::::After giving it more thought, I think we could merge this proposed section with "Fictionalized account", making a "Cultural references" section of sorts, so we can write about the literary developments before and after the novel. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 21:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

19199 +++$+++ Acps110 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-06 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.283817780E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Brooklyn_Bridge&curid=47742&diff=383273618&oldid=383188925 This] is an awesome pic. Thanks for finding it and placing it!  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brooklyn_Bridge&curid=47742&diff=383273618&oldid=383188925 This] is an awesome pic. Thanks for finding it and placing it! [[User:Acps110|Acps110]] <sup>([[User talk:Acps110|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Acps110|contribs]])</sup> 17:03, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
19200 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19199 +++$+++ 19199 +++$+++ 2010-09-06 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.283838000E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  That particular spot on the bridge is a photographer's mecca, so I was surprised we didn't have a shot of it in the article.  There were several good candidates on Commons, but Jim Henderson's seemed the best.  I've seen and liked his work before on Wikipedia; please express your appreciation [[commons:User_talk:Jim.henderson|to him]] as well.-- +++$+++ :Thanks.  That particular spot on the bridge is a photographer's mecca, so I was surprised we didn't have a shot of it in the article.  There were several good candidates on Commons, but Jim Henderson's seemed the best.  I've seen and liked his work before on Wikipedia; please express your appreciation [[commons:User_talk:Jim.henderson|to him]] as well.--[[User:Father Goose|Father Goose]] ([[User talk:Father Goose#top|talk]]) 22:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

19201 +++$+++ PC78 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-10 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.286750700E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just wanted to query this template with you. I've already read some of the discussion that led to it's creation, but it doesn't appear to be used and is essentially just a duplicate of the BLP editintro template. What happened regarding the proposal to implement this, and is the template still required?  +++$+++ Hi, I just wanted to query this template with you. I've already read some of the discussion that led to it's creation, but it doesn't appear to be used and is essentially just a duplicate of the BLP editintro template. What happened regarding the proposal to implement this, and is the template still required? [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 15:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
19202 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19201 +++$+++ 19201 +++$+++ 2010-10-11 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.286792340E09 +++$+++ It's a project that stalled.  I'll move the template to my userspace on the chance that the project will be taken up again at some point.  I appreciate your due diligence in contacting the involved users before sending it off to gulag.-- +++$+++ :It's a project that stalled.  I'll move the template to my userspace on the chance that the project will be taken up again at some point.  I appreciate your due diligence in contacting the involved users before sending it off to gulag.--[[User:Father Goose|Father Goose]] ([[User talk:Father Goose#top|talk]]) 03:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
19203 +++$+++ PC78 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19201 +++$+++ 19202 +++$+++ 2010-10-11 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.286844540E09 +++$+++ No worries. What about {{tl|BLP help}}? It appears to be an earlier version of the same thing, though this particular format seems to have been opposed (and it's not hard to see why).  +++$+++ ::No worries. What about {{tl|BLP help}}? It appears to be an earlier version of the same thing, though this particular format seems to have been opposed (and it's not hard to see why). [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 17:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
19204 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19201 +++$+++ 19203 +++$+++ 2010-10-11 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.286856960E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'll move that to userspace as well.  It's an idea that had merit, but we didn't follow up and at present I don't have the time to continue with it.  Oh well.-- +++$+++ :::Yeah, I'll move that to userspace as well.  It's an idea that had merit, but we didn't follow up and at present I don't have the time to continue with it.  Oh well.--[[User:Father Goose|Father Goose]] ([[User talk:Father Goose#top|talk]]) 21:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

281347 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-04 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.180941060E09 +++$+++ (undent)Well we haven't ''really'' discussed as a wikiproject whether we want everything under a \"Cultural references\" section, or whether we want two sections, one for ROTK (and possibly plays etc. from centuries ago) and one for everything more modern... I dunno how much of TK and ROTK is duplicated\/mimicked\/caricatured in games etc.  +++$+++ (undent)Well we haven't ''really'' discussed as a wikiproject whether we want everything under a "Cultural references" section, or whether we want two sections, one for ROTK (and possibly plays etc. from centuries ago) and one for everything more modern... I dunno how much of TK and ROTK is duplicated/mimicked/caricatured in games etc. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 00:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
281348 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281347 +++$+++ 281347 +++$+++ 2007-06-04 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.180970280E09 +++$+++ If we want to explain the ROTK version in detail then ROTK should have its own section, but if we're just going to gloss over it (like it is now), I think it's okay to put that in a subsection of \"Cultural references\". Though if we're writing a \"Modern references\", we must exercise caution in regards to [[WP:TRIVIA]].... +++$+++ :If we want to explain the ROTK version in detail then ROTK should have its own section, but if we're just going to gloss over it (like it is now), I think it's okay to put that in a subsection of "Cultural references". Though if we're writing a "Modern references", we must exercise caution in regards to [[WP:TRIVIA]]....[[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 08:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

585485 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-02 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.209778560E09 +++$+++ Copyedit from my \"talk\" page: Hello Bzuk, I was wondering, would you like [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature|rollback rights]] granted to your account? You do quite a bit of vandal-reverting, and rollback would make that easier for you. Just remember that rollback should only be used to revert obvious vandalism, and should not be used to revert good-faith edits or to revert-war.  +++$+++ Copyedit from my "talk" page: Hello Bzuk, I was wondering, would you like [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature|rollback rights]] granted to your account? You do quite a bit of vandal-reverting, and rollback would make that easier for you. Just remember that rollback should only be used to revert obvious vandalism, and should not be used to revert good-faith edits or to revert-war. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
585486 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585485 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-02 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.209779400E09 +++$+++ I've granted your account rollback, as administrators have the ability to grant rollback. The other way of obtaining rollback would be to file a request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for rollback]], or just ask any admin for it. You may wish to see [[Wikipedia:New admin school\/Rollback]] for practice. Good luck.  +++$+++ ::I've granted your account rollback, as administrators have the ability to grant rollback. The other way of obtaining rollback would be to file a request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for rollback]], or just ask any admin for it. You may wish to see [[Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback]] for practice. Good luck. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
585487 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585485 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-02 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.209780600E09 +++$+++ You're welcome; it's very useful with reverting vandalism, and if you're careful with the tool, you'll have no problems. Best wishes.  +++$+++ ::::You're welcome; it's very useful with reverting vandalism, and if you're careful with the tool, you'll have no problems. Best wishes. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
585488 +++$+++ Jeffq +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585485 +++$+++ 585485 +++$+++ 2008-05-02 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.209788400E09 +++$+++ Yes, thank you. I would appreciate that. I try to be very careful about distinguishing between \"vandalism\" and anything that appears to be at least arguably good-faith, so I would plan to use it much as I do as a Wikiquote admin \u2014 sparingly and only for edits that are obviously malicious or pranks. ~  +++$+++ : Yes, thank you. I would appreciate that. I try to be very careful about distinguishing between "vandalism" and anything that appears to be at least arguably good-faith, so I would plan to use it much as I do as a Wikiquote admin — sparingly and only for edits that are obviously malicious or pranks. ~ [[User:Jeffq|Jeff Q]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Jeffq|(talk)]] 21:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
585489 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585485 +++$+++ 585488 +++$+++ 2008-05-02 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.209788460E09 +++$+++ Rollback granted. :) Good luck.  +++$+++ ::Rollback granted. :) Good luck. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 21:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

19205 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-01 04:14:00 +++$+++ 1.288610040E09 +++$+++ Hi.  Just letting you know that [[Glen \"Frosty\" Little]], on whose page you worked, died on October 26, 2010, apparently of natural causes.  (See [http:\/\/clownalley.blogspot.com\/2010\/10\/glen-frosty-little-from-times-news.html|here].)  If I remember correctly you didn't personally know him but if I'm wrong, please accept my condolences.  Tipped off by an anonymous editor, I have made the necessary changes to his page but they could use another eye to check that all the tenses match et cetera. -  +++$+++ Hi.  Just letting you know that [[Glen "Frosty" Little]], on whose page you worked, died on October 26, 2010, apparently of natural causes.  (See [http://clownalley.blogspot.com/2010/10/glen-frosty-little-from-times-news.html|here].)  If I remember correctly you didn't personally know him but if I'm wrong, please accept my condolences.  Tipped off by an anonymous editor, I have made the necessary changes to his page but they could use another eye to check that all the tenses match et cetera. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 04:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
19206 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19205 +++$+++ 19205 +++$+++ 2010-11-01 08:13:00 +++$+++ 1.288624380E09 +++$+++ I didn't know him, but it's sad all the same.  I made a couple of additional fixes\/expansions and tweaked sources.  Thanks for your help.-- +++$+++ :I didn't know him, but it's sad all the same.  I made a couple of additional fixes/expansions and tweaked sources.  Thanks for your help.--[[User:Father Goose|Father Goose]] ([[User talk:Father Goose#top|talk]]) 08:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

568027 +++$+++ J.delanoy +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-19 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.205918520E09 +++$+++ <u><big>'''HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!'''<\/u><\/big> <small>(I was going to write the whole Birthday Song out here, but your username has too many syllables. Sorry.)<\/small>  +++$+++ <u><big>'''HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!'''</u></big> <small>(I was going to write the whole Birthday Song out here, but your username has too many syllables. Sorry.)</small> [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="#ffe800">J.d</font><font color="#00ff00">ela</font><font color="green">noy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<sub><font color="blue">adds</font></sub>]] 02:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
568028 +++$+++ Cremepuff222 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568027 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.205918880E09 +++$+++ Hehe, nice to still see you here. :-) <span style=\"font-family: Berlin Sans FB Demi; font-size: 10pt\"> +++$+++ ::Hehe, nice to still see you here. :-) <span style="font-family: Berlin Sans FB Demi; font-size: 10pt">[[User talk:Cremepuff222|<font color="#000000">*Cremepuff</font><font color="#696969">222*</font>]]</span> 02:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
568029 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568027 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-19 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.205942520E09 +++$+++ Thanks to all of you who have commented above! And note that today is not my real birthday, it is my first edit anniversary. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;background:red;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :::Thanks to all of you who have commented above! And note that today is not my real birthday, it is my first edit anniversary. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;background:red;padding:1px;">[[User:NHRHS2010|<b>NHRHS2010</b>]] | [[User_talk:NHRHS2010|<font style="color:black;background:red;">&nbsp;Talk to me&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 09:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

19207 +++$+++ Arolión Yolenda +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19207 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-12 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.292201700E09 +++$+++ No offence intended, but have you ever noticed that \"sesquipedalianism\" is not a word that the \"general audience\" would be able to cope with, either?  +++$+++ No offence intended, but have you ever noticed that "sesquipedalianism" is not a word that the "general audience" would be able to cope with, either? [[User:Arolión Yolenda|Arolión Yolenda]] ([[User talk:Arolión Yolenda|talk]]) 16:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19208 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19207 +++$+++ 19207 +++$+++ 2010-12-13 08:20:00 +++$+++ 1.292257200E09 +++$+++ Yes, I was using it jokingly to emphasize my point.  Elaborate writing is great and all, but not a good fit for Wikipedia.-- +++$+++ :Yes, I was using it jokingly to emphasize my point.  Elaborate writing is great and all, but not a good fit for Wikipedia.--[[User:Father Goose|Father Goose]] ([[User talk:Father Goose#top|talk]]) 08:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

281352 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281352 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.181030040E09 +++$+++ I don't think removing that info is the correct fix. Just change the punctuation... OK if I do so?  +++$+++ I don't think removing that info is the correct fix. Just change the punctuation... OK if I do so? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 00:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
281353 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281352 +++$+++ 281352 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.181030280E09 +++$+++ Well, I figured the mention of Jiangling could be delayed without any loss in flow....but, please do as you see fit, you're a better writer than I am.  +++$+++ :Well, I figured the mention of Jiangling could be delayed without any loss in flow....but, please do as you see fit, you're a better writer than I am. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 00:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
281354 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281352 +++$+++ 281352 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.181031780E09 +++$+++ Don't be so modest. You've added tons of encyclopedic content to the Three Kingdoms articles. You're definitely the go-to editor &amp; resident guru. I would usually tend to defer to your opinions... :-) -- +++$+++ * Don't be so modest. You've added tons of encyclopedic content to the Three Kingdoms articles. You're definitely the go-to editor &amp; resident guru. I would usually tend to defer to your opinions... :-) --[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 01:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
281355 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281352 +++$+++ 281354 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.181031960E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your kind words =)  +++$+++ ::Thank you for your kind words =) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 01:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

19209 +++$+++ Slakr +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-10 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.294668240E09 +++$+++ You do realize that the entire article is a violation of [[WP:BLP1E]], right? Do you also realize that I had already speedily closed the afd before? -- +++$+++ You do realize that the entire article is a violation of [[WP:BLP1E]], right? Do you also realize that I had already speedily closed the afd before? --[[User:Slakr|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\&nbsp;[[User talk:Slakr|talk]]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 06:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
19210 +++$+++ Slakr +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19209 +++$+++ 19209 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.294668360E09 +++$+++ Also, you have a clear conflict of interest in this area. Only uninvolved administrators should close AFDs. -- +++$+++ :Also, you have a clear conflict of interest in this area. Only uninvolved administrators should close AFDs. --[[User:Slakr|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\&nbsp;[[User talk:Slakr|talk]]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 06:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
19211 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19209 +++$+++ 19210 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.294669800E09 +++$+++ If you feel that I have initiated a wheel war, or that the handful of edits I made to [[2011 Tucson shooting]] invalidate my closing rationale, by all means raise the issue on the Administrator's Noticeboard or before the Arbitration Committee.-- +++$+++ ::If you feel that I have initiated a wheel war, or that the handful of edits I made to [[2011 Tucson shooting]] invalidate my closing rationale, by all means raise the issue on the Administrator's Noticeboard or before the Arbitration Committee.--[[User:Father Goose|Father Goose]] ([[User talk:Father Goose#top|talk]]) 06:30, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
19212 +++$+++ Slakr +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19209 +++$+++ 19211 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.294670460E09 +++$+++ It's a ''suspect'', which fails [[WP:CRIMINAL]] on its own. So, failing that, it fails[[WP:BLP1E]], as the person is not notable for any other reason. This person ''is a suspect'', and if the article is gutted of the facts pertaining to the alleged crime (which as a suspect we can't assume he's done until he's convicted), the article would be deleted or redirected, because the person has no notability apart from the crime. The crime is significant and notable, but until determined to be the convicted perpetrator, the person does not get their own article, as has been repeatedly determined in the past. -- +++$+++ :::It's a ''suspect'', which fails [[WP:CRIMINAL]] on its own. So, failing that, it fails[[WP:BLP1E]], as the person is not notable for any other reason. This person ''is a suspect'', and if the article is gutted of the facts pertaining to the alleged crime (which as a suspect we can't assume he's done until he's convicted), the article would be deleted or redirected, because the person has no notability apart from the crime. The crime is significant and notable, but until determined to be the convicted perpetrator, the person does not get their own article, as has been repeatedly determined in the past. --[[User:Slakr|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\&nbsp;[[User talk:Slakr|talk]]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 06:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
19213 +++$+++ Slakr +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19209 +++$+++ 19211 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.294671360E09 +++$+++ ...and on a related note, I have no desire to wheel war or anything; in fact, just the opposite. I know all about [[User:Slakr\/TPE|torches and pitchforks]], so I was basically coming here to implore you to allow the stupid thing to run and let it ''close uncontroversially'', having already closed it apparently controversially once already. -- +++$+++ :::...and on a related note, I have no desire to wheel war or anything; in fact, just the opposite. I know all about [[User:Slakr/TPE|torches and pitchforks]], so I was basically coming here to implore you to allow the stupid thing to run and let it ''close uncontroversially'', having already closed it apparently controversially once already. --[[User:Slakr|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\&nbsp;[[User talk:Slakr|talk]]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 06:56, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
19214 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19209 +++$+++ 19213 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 07:31:00 +++$+++ 1.294673460E09 +++$+++ I'd say we're about hip-deep already.  I hope I managed to communicate as much with my closing rationale.-- +++$+++ ::::I'd say we're about hip-deep already.  I hope I managed to communicate as much with my closing rationale.--[[User:Father Goose|Father Goose]] ([[User talk:Father Goose#top|talk]]) 07:31, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

90583 +++$+++ Orlady +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-23 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.216802040E09 +++$+++ You added [[Arnie Zane]] to [[List of HIV-positive people]]. (Looks like a good addition.) To remain on that list, a person needs to have an article. Are you planning to create an article about Zane? -- +++$+++ You added [[Arnie Zane]] to [[List of HIV-positive people]]. (Looks like a good addition.) To remain on that list, a person needs to have an article. Are you planning to create an article about Zane? --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 01:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
90584 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90583 +++$+++ 90583 +++$+++ 2008-07-23 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.216804140E09 +++$+++ Yes I am. I met him some years ago and he was a fantastic performer. I was very saddened to hear he had become ill and died.--[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] |  +++$+++ :Yes I am. I met him some years ago and he was a fantastic performer. I was very saddened to hear he had become ill and died.--[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] | [[User:Filll/WP Challenge|<font color="Green"><small>wpc</small></font>]]) 02:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

543500 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543500 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-19 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.179626640E09 +++$+++ Congrats!  Unanimous, too. '''\xb7 <font color=\"#70A070\"> +++$+++ Congrats!  Unanimous, too. '''· <font color="#70A070">[[User:Jersyko|jersyko]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' 19:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
543501 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543500 +++$+++ 543500 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.179629820E09 +++$+++ Thank you. It's great to be elected uninamously-I'll get better aquainted with my tools\/reponsibilities this evening when I'll be back online (I'll also thank users who support my RfA). Regards, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Thank you. It's great to be elected uninamously-I'll get better aquainted with my tools/reponsibilities this evening when I'll be back online (I'll also thank users who support my RfA). Regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 19:57, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
543502 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543500 +++$+++ 543501 +++$+++ 2007-05-22 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.179851820E09 +++$+++ Congratulation's! You've earned the trust of the Wikipedia community, good work; and, for the future, good luck. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Congratulation's! You've earned the trust of the Wikipedia community, good work; and, for the future, good luck. Cheers, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 09:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

19215 +++$+++ Scott MacDonald +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-10 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.294679940E09 +++$+++ Please consider undoing this \"close\". It read more like a vote to me. There was a clear majority\/consensus for merge\/redirect, and most of the keep votes amounted to \"he's famous\" - now the keep opinions were gathering in number - so a keep outcome may emerge in time, or not. There's also a unanimous merge decision at [[Talk:Jared_Lee_Loughner#Proposed_merge]]. Given that, a \"speedy keep\" was highly inappropriate. I suggest you reopen this, move your comments (which may well be right) to an opinion not a close, and let someone uninvolved close this in a few days time. Otherwise it will be overturned at DRV and we'll be back for another AFD. It may well be that we'll end up with a keep either ways, but reopening the AFD and letting it run for another 8 days will avoid edit warring and forum shopping in the meantime. -- +++$+++ Please consider undoing this "close". It read more like a vote to me. There was a clear majority/consensus for merge/redirect, and most of the keep votes amounted to "he's famous" - now the keep opinions were gathering in number - so a keep outcome may emerge in time, or not. There's also a unanimous merge decision at [[Talk:Jared_Lee_Loughner#Proposed_merge]]. Given that, a "speedy keep" was highly inappropriate. I suggest you reopen this, move your comments (which may well be right) to an opinion not a close, and let someone uninvolved close this in a few days time. Otherwise it will be overturned at DRV and we'll be back for another AFD. It may well be that we'll end up with a keep either ways, but reopening the AFD and letting it run for another 8 days will avoid edit warring and forum shopping in the meantime. --[[User talk:Scott MacDonald|Scott Mac]] 09:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
19216 +++$+++ Scott MacDonald +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19215 +++$+++ 19215 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 09:41:00 +++$+++ 1.294681260E09 +++$+++ Given that you seem to be off-line, that you'd already edited the article in question, and that there's an edit-war already between enforcign the AFD keep and the other merge, I'm going to re-open the AFD and let it run. It will probably end up being inconclusive, but at least it will give a forum and process for the discussion.-- +++$+++ :Given that you seem to be off-line, that you'd already edited the article in question, and that there's an edit-war already between enforcign the AFD keep and the other merge, I'm going to re-open the AFD and let it run. It will probably end up being inconclusive, but at least it will give a forum and process for the discussion.--[[User talk:Scott MacDonald|Scott Mac]] 09:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
19217 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19215 +++$+++ 19216 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.294681620E09 +++$+++ I suspect you understand that keeping this specific article out of the encyclopedia will be a losing battle, so why fight it?  Why force everyone else to fight it too?-- +++$+++ ::I suspect you understand that keeping this specific article out of the encyclopedia will be a losing battle, so why fight it?  Why force everyone else to fight it too?--[[User:Father Goose|Father Goose]] ([[User talk:Father Goose#top|talk]]) 09:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
19218 +++$+++ Scott MacDonald +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19215 +++$+++ 19217 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.294688880E09 +++$+++ You are correct in saying that the article will almost certainly be kept. (Whether I think it should be is neither here nor there). However, there obviously lots of people who want to redirect or merge it, and they are going to want to have their say. Speedy closures can be good things, but they only work where everyone says \"yes, that's obvious\" and moves on. That wasn't going to happen here. The result of your closure was that the debate betweeen keepers and mergers continued as an  edit war and a discussion in other venues. So, to that degree, the attempt to move to a speedy result failed. Sometimes, even when the result is obvious, contentious issues need to be talked out so that when the conclusion comes both sides can accept it. As I say, I think your closure was good faith, and I agree was probebly the \"inevitable result\", yet it failed to close the discussion - and it is better that discussion continue on afd than take more disruptive forms.-- +++$+++ :::You are correct in saying that the article will almost certainly be kept. (Whether I think it should be is neither here nor there). However, there obviously lots of people who want to redirect or merge it, and they are going to want to have their say. Speedy closures can be good things, but they only work where everyone says "yes, that's obvious" and moves on. That wasn't going to happen here. The result of your closure was that the debate betweeen keepers and mergers continued as an  edit war and a discussion in other venues. So, to that degree, the attempt to move to a speedy result failed. Sometimes, even when the result is obvious, contentious issues need to be talked out so that when the conclusion comes both sides can accept it. As I say, I think your closure was good faith, and I agree was probebly the "inevitable result", yet it failed to close the discussion - and it is better that discussion continue on afd than take more disruptive forms.--[[User talk:Scott MacDonald|Scott Mac]] 11:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
19219 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19215 +++$+++ 19218 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.294713240E09 +++$+++ Don't acknowledge that to me.  Acknowledge that to the people on your side.  They'll listen to you.  If your interest is actually in wanting the edit-warring to stop, you are in a position to stop it.-- +++$+++ ::::Don't acknowledge that to me.  Acknowledge that to the people on your side.  They'll listen to you.  If your interest is actually in wanting the edit-warring to stop, you are in a position to stop it.--[[User:Father Goose|Father Goose]] ([[User talk:Father Goose#top|talk]]) 18:34, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
19220 +++$+++ Scott MacDonald +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19215 +++$+++ 19219 +++$+++ 2011-01-10 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.294714260E09 +++$+++ I don't think there are sides here. And if you think I've the power to say \"hey this is lost\" and everyone will fall silent, then ... well, then you're obviously wrong. If this were opened now, I don't think I'd even bother voting on it - but there is a discussion people some want to have, and neither you nor I can prevent that. It is only a question of where it happens. If anything it is easier to ignore it if it works itself out in a debate that will obviously be closed as either keep or no consensus keep in a week or so.-- +++$+++ :::::I don't think there are sides here. And if you think I've the power to say "hey this is lost" and everyone will fall silent, then ... well, then you're obviously wrong. If this were opened now, I don't think I'd even bother voting on it - but there is a discussion people some want to have, and neither you nor I can prevent that. It is only a question of where it happens. If anything it is easier to ignore it if it works itself out in a debate that will obviously be closed as either keep or no consensus keep in a week or so.--[[User talk:Scott MacDonald|Scott Mac]] 18:51, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

281360 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-09 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.181388480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 04:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
281361 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281360 +++$+++ 281360 +++$+++ 2007-06-09 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.181389140E09 +++$+++ Hahaha, I'm promoted to general now...No worries there, Commander-in-Chief Ling.Nut, I shall carry on your legacy during your absence to the best of my capabilities. It's great to work with you and I wish you Godspeed. *salutes*  +++$+++ :Hahaha, I'm promoted to general now...No worries there, Commander-in-Chief Ling.Nut, I shall carry on your legacy during your absence to the best of my capabilities. It's great to work with you and I wish you Godspeed. *salutes* [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 04:39, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

281362 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281362 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-10 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.181465460E09 +++$+++ I was discussing this with Ling.Nut, since I've seen them around before.  What do you think of a founding member userbox for yourself, me and Ling?  +++$+++ I was discussing this with Ling.Nut, since I've seen them around before.  What do you think of a founding member userbox for yourself, me and Ling? [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 01:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
281363 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281362 +++$+++ 281362 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.181468460E09 +++$+++ You mean something like what [[User:Kirill Lokshin]] has on his userpage?  +++$+++ :You mean something like what [[User:Kirill Lokshin]] has on his userpage? [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 02:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
281364 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281362 +++$+++ 281363 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.181468640E09 +++$+++ Yes, something like that, although ours will read \"this user is a founding member of WikiProject Three Kingdoms\".  Check Ling's user page, since he's drawing one up at the moment and already has an example box posted.  +++$+++ ::Yes, something like that, although ours will read "this user is a founding member of WikiProject Three Kingdoms".  Check Ling's user page, since he's drawing one up at the moment and already has an example box posted. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 02:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

543508 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543508 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-12 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.184295960E09 +++$+++ Really, you do amazing work.  I saw the income inequality article and noticed your recent edits to the Democratic Party article, and I just had to give you this. '''\xb7 <font color=\"#70A070\"> +++$+++ Really, you do amazing work.  I saw the income inequality article and noticed your recent edits to the Democratic Party article, and I just had to give you this. '''· <font color="#70A070">[[User:Jersyko|jersyko]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' 20:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
543509 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543508 +++$+++ 543508 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.184312820E09 +++$+++ Thank you Jersyko! I really appreciate the recognition... I'm very glad to see that my contributions are so well-received! Let me assure you, that you too are an asset to Wikipedia and deserving of a barnstar... right after I find the right one. <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :Thank you Jersyko! I really appreciate the recognition... I'm very glad to see that my contributions are so well-received! Let me assure you, that you too are an asset to Wikipedia and deserving of a barnstar... right after I find the right one. <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 00:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
543510 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543508 +++$+++ 543509 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.184321400E09 +++$+++ No, please don't.  I don't expect any kind of favor in return.  Cheers. '''\xb7 <font color=\"#70A070\"> +++$+++ ::No, please don't.  I don't expect any kind of favor in return.  Cheers. '''· <font color="#70A070">[[User:Jersyko|jersyko]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' 03:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
543511 +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ BrendelSignature +++$+++ 543508 +++$+++ 543510 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.184322360E09 +++$+++ Ok then... I appreciate the recognition though. Thanks, <b><font face=\"Arial\" color=\"1F860E\">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]<\/font><font color=\"20038A\"><sup> +++$+++ :::Ok then... I appreciate the recognition though. Thanks, <b><font face="Arial" color="1F860E">[[User:BrendelSignature|Signature]]</font><font color="20038A"><sup>[[User:BrendelSignature|brendel]]</sup></font></b> 03:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

281365 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281365 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-10 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.181474820E09 +++$+++ (undent) I made the length of the userbox = standard. About the height.. I could fool with it... if you insist... ;-) look at my user page for the founding member option...  +++$+++ (undent) I made the length of the userbox = standard. About the height.. I could fool with it... if you insist... ;-) look at my user page for the founding member option... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 04:27, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
281366 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281365 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.181503920E09 +++$+++ two-tone?  +++$+++ ::two-tone? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 12:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

19222 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-29 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.296356220E09 +++$+++ Father Goose, can I ask you to remove this statement from the [[Analytical engine]] talk page?  It doesn't have anything to do with the discussion.  It's purely ad hominem.  It's not a positive contribution toward resolution of a content issue.  It's a personal opinion that is subjective and doesn't have any firm basis on what comes before it.  And all that it is likely to do is become a self-fulfilling prophecy that turns the discussion into something increasingly about persons rather than about ideas.  Cheers,  +++$+++ Father Goose, can I ask you to remove this statement from the [[Analytical engine]] talk page?  It doesn't have anything to do with the discussion.  It's purely ad hominem.  It's not a positive contribution toward resolution of a content issue.  It's a personal opinion that is subjective and doesn't have any firm basis on what comes before it.  And all that it is likely to do is become a self-fulfilling prophecy that turns the discussion into something increasingly about persons rather than about ideas.  Cheers, [[User:Robert K S|Robert&nbsp;K&nbsp;S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 18:57, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
19223 +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19222 +++$+++ 19222 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.296375000E09 +++$+++ I do think that there is something in how you are approaching the argument, and not the points themselves, that is provoking that defensive response.  That's why I said what I said.  I have a sense of how to recast your points in a less adversarial tone, but you'd have to be willing to yield the podium to me, which is to say, let me take over the argument for a couple of paragraphs and trust that I'll move it in a direction favorable to to your views.  May I ask for your permission to attempt this?-- +++$+++ :I do think that there is something in how you are approaching the argument, and not the points themselves, that is provoking that defensive response.  That's why I said what I said.  I have a sense of how to recast your points in a less adversarial tone, but you'd have to be willing to yield the podium to me, which is to say, let me take over the argument for a couple of paragraphs and trust that I'll move it in a direction favorable to to your views.  May I ask for your permission to attempt this?--[[User:Father Goose|Father Goose]] ([[User talk:Father Goose#top|talk]]) 00:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
19224 +++$+++ Robert K S +++$+++ Father Goose +++$+++ 19222 +++$+++ 19223 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.296390480E09 +++$+++ Have at it.  +++$+++ ::Have at it. [[User:Robert K S|Robert&nbsp;K&nbsp;S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 04:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

281367 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-14 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.181809560E09 +++$+++ hey, what the heck, ya wanna send red cliffs thru FAC? It may not pass, but I think it has a fighting chance (no pun intended).  +++$+++ hey, what the heck, ya wanna send red cliffs thru FAC? It may not pass, but I think it has a fighting chance (no pun intended). [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 01:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
281368 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281367 +++$+++ 281367 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.181815800E09 +++$+++ I think it might pass just as it is &mdash; the only negative thing from your perspective is, if anyone wants big changes, it'll mostly fall on you to do it. I can't dedicate a ''block'' of time to Wikipedia.. only moments here and there...  +++$+++ :I think it might pass just as it is &mdash; the only negative thing from your perspective is, if anyone wants big changes, it'll mostly fall on you to do it. I can't dedicate a ''block'' of time to Wikipedia.. only moments here and there... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 03:10, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
281369 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281367 +++$+++ 281367 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.181820480E09 +++$+++ I'm worried about its lack of illustrations, two's just too few for a FA.  +++$+++ :I'm worried about its lack of illustrations, two's just too few for a FA. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 04:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
281370 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281367 +++$+++ 281369 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.181840820E09 +++$+++ de Crespigny discusses the various type of naval craft of the era.. we could find a pic of a relevant Chinese ship...? Will look...  +++$+++ ::de Crespigny discusses the various type of naval craft of the era.. we could find a pic of a relevant Chinese ship...? Will look... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 10:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
281371 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281367 +++$+++ 281370 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.181843280E09 +++$+++ ... mengchong doujian (\u8499\u51b2\u6597\u8230) ... maybe this [http:\/\/military.china.com\/zh_cn\/history2\/06\/11027560\/20050420\/12256979.html]? Also look in Chinese wikipedia under \"naval warfare\" or some such?  +++$+++ ::: ... mengchong doujian (蒙冲斗舰) ... maybe this [http://military.china.com/zh_cn/history2/06/11027560/20050420/12256979.html]? Also look in Chinese wikipedia under "naval warfare" or some such? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 10:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
281372 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281367 +++$+++ 281371 +++$+++ 2007-06-14 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.181843820E09 +++$+++ The Chinese Wikipedia has no article on naval warfare...its editors were too busy writing about internet memes and minor streets of Hong Kong, all while trolling about politics...I digress. That image seems fine, but it lacks source information though.  +++$+++ ::::The Chinese Wikipedia has no article on naval warfare...its editors were too busy writing about internet memes and minor streets of Hong Kong, all while trolling about politics...I digress. That image seems fine, but it lacks source information though. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 10:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

19225 +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19225 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-16 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.303015380E09 +++$+++ I have decided to return to Wikipedia thanks to the wise decisions of the Arbs regarding the case of [[User:Noleander]] despite an attempt during that case for an individual to draw me into the case as a \"party\". +++$+++ I have decided to return to Wikipedia thanks to the wise decisions of the Arbs regarding the case of [[User:Noleander]] despite an attempt during that case for an individual to draw me into the case as a "party".[[User:Camelbinky|Camelbinky]] ([[User talk:Camelbinky#top|talk]]) 21:43, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
19226 +++$+++ UpstateNYer +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19225 +++$+++ 19225 +++$+++ 2011-04-17 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.303101720E09 +++$+++ Excellent! I was recently working with the [[College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering]] to write an article with them. It just went live. Originally we got some grief that it might be a bit too 'selling'. I think I fixed much of it, but would you mind going through and touching up the tone if you think it sounds too much like an advertisement? ''' +++$+++ :Excellent! I was recently working with the [[College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering]] to write an article with them. It just went live. Originally we got some grief that it might be a bit too 'selling'. I think I fixed much of it, but would you mind going through and touching up the tone if you think it sounds too much like an advertisement? '''[[User:UpstateNYer|<span style="color:darkred">upstate</span>]][[User talk:UpstateNYer|<span style="color:darkblue">NYer</span>]]''' 21:42, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
19227 +++$+++ Gyrobo +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19225 +++$+++ 19225 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.303193640E09 +++$+++ Welcome back! Before I saw [[Timeline of town creation in the Hudson Valley]] at FL, I just about to ask if you wanted to renominate. Good luck! -- +++$+++ :Welcome back! Before I saw [[Timeline of town creation in the Hudson Valley]] at FL, I just about to ask if you wanted to renominate. Good luck! --[[User:Gyrobo|Gyrobo]] ([[User talk:Gyrobo|talk]]) 23:14, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

19228 +++$+++ Gyrobo +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-25 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.303767540E09 +++$+++ It looks like you're going to be working on the Pine Hill article soon, but I just wanted to let you know that when you get to the Selkirk Yard article, you may want to look at the sources on [[Hudson Valley Rail Trail]]. There's a book (''Bridging the Hudson'') that says the technology at the Selkirk Yard was one of the reasons the [[Poughkeepsie Bridge Route]] was abandoned. Probably important to mention. -- +++$+++ It looks like you're going to be working on the Pine Hill article soon, but I just wanted to let you know that when you get to the Selkirk Yard article, you may want to look at the sources on [[Hudson Valley Rail Trail]]. There's a book (''Bridging the Hudson'') that says the technology at the Selkirk Yard was one of the reasons the [[Poughkeepsie Bridge Route]] was abandoned. Probably important to mention. --[[User:Gyrobo|Gyrobo]] ([[User talk:Gyrobo|talk]]) 14:39, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
19229 +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19228 +++$+++ 19228 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.303876980E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I'll definitely need to see if I can get my hands on that book and am glad you brought that article to my attention, did not know it existed. Keep up the good work. And you are always welcomed to add sources to my user page or start any article, those sources are there to be used and unfortunately I havent had time to use them. I'd be proud if someone ran with them and got them going and did what I havent had time to do. +++$+++ :Thank you! I'll definitely need to see if I can get my hands on that book and am glad you brought that article to my attention, did not know it existed. Keep up the good work. And you are always welcomed to add sources to my user page or start any article, those sources are there to be used and unfortunately I havent had time to use them. I'd be proud if someone ran with them and got them going and did what I havent had time to do.[[User:Camelbinky|Camelbinky]] ([[User talk:Camelbinky#top|talk]]) 21:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

19230 +++$+++ Cla68 +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.310126820E09 +++$+++ I appreciate your input at the WQA board and your contributions to Wikipedia.  I'm sorry for the offense my comment may have caused you, and also sorry that you had to witness the behavior at the WQA that occurred there today.  Those two editors who were acting that way, of course, do not represent the way that most editors in Wikipedia act.  I will be following the dispute resolution process to try to persuade them to correct the behavior in question.  +++$+++ I appreciate your input at the WQA board and your contributions to Wikipedia.  I'm sorry for the offense my comment may have caused you, and also sorry that you had to witness the behavior at the WQA that occurred there today.  Those two editors who were acting that way, of course, do not represent the way that most editors in Wikipedia act.  I will be following the dispute resolution process to try to persuade them to correct the behavior in question. [[User:Cla68|Cla68]] ([[User talk:Cla68|talk]]) 05:07, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
19231 +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19230 +++$+++ 19230 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.310191080E09 +++$+++ I accept your apology and understand your explanation. And also wish you luck as I do agree that certain editors have been getting away with rudeness. +++$+++ :I accept your apology and understand your explanation. And also wish you luck as I do agree that certain editors have been getting away with rudeness.[[User:Camelbinky|Camelbinky]] ([[User talk:Camelbinky#top|talk]]) 22:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

19232 +++$+++ UpstateNYer +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.310374920E09 +++$+++ Hey I'm updating (and hoping to bring to FL status) [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Albany, New York]]. I have photos for almost all the properties now. Unfortunately, I don't know the neighborhood layout in Albany as well as you. Could you look at the ones missing information and confirm the rest as well? Specifically, I don't know what the 'neighborhood' along Washington Ave in midtown is called. Also, there's a number that are near Western Ave close to Manning Blvd. Not sure what that's called either. You help would be appreciated. ''' +++$+++ Hey I'm updating (and hoping to bring to FL status) [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Albany, New York]]. I have photos for almost all the properties now. Unfortunately, I don't know the neighborhood layout in Albany as well as you. Could you look at the ones missing information and confirm the rest as well? Specifically, I don't know what the 'neighborhood' along Washington Ave in midtown is called. Also, there's a number that are near Western Ave close to Manning Blvd. Not sure what that's called either. You help would be appreciated. '''[[User:UpstateNYer|<span style="color:darkred">upstate</span>]][[User talk:UpstateNYer|<span style="color:darkblue">NYer</span>]]''' 02:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
19233 +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19232 +++$+++ 19232 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.310421540E09 +++$+++ Yea some are hard to pin down to a neighborhood, I'm guessing you are talking about Washington Avenue between the Al Smith Building and the Armory, that's a tough one, it's such a commercial district the city usually just lists something along the lines of \"Lower Washington Ave Commercial District\" I'll see what official wording they use. Western Ave close to Manning would be [[Pine Hills, Albany, New York]]. I'll go through and see what I can do. +++$+++ :Yea some are hard to pin down to a neighborhood, I'm guessing you are talking about Washington Avenue between the Al Smith Building and the Armory, that's a tough one, it's such a commercial district the city usually just lists something along the lines of "Lower Washington Ave Commercial District" I'll see what official wording they use. Western Ave close to Manning would be [[Pine Hills, Albany, New York]]. I'll go through and see what I can do.[[User:Camelbinky|Camelbinky]] ([[User talk:Camelbinky#top|talk]]) 14:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
19234 +++$+++ UpstateNYer +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19232 +++$+++ 19233 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.310457780E09 +++$+++ Awesome, thanks. Also, I figured you might be interested in [[User:UpstateNYer\/Reynolds]]. Surprised, really, to find out he didn't have an article. Some good sources out there. If you want to play with this before I bring it live (no, I'm not done yet), feel free. ''' +++$+++ ::Awesome, thanks. Also, I figured you might be interested in [[User:UpstateNYer/Reynolds]]. Surprised, really, to find out he didn't have an article. Some good sources out there. If you want to play with this before I bring it live (no, I'm not done yet), feel free. '''[[User:UpstateNYer|<span style="color:darkred">upstate</span>]][[User talk:UpstateNYer|<span style="color:darkblue">NYer</span>]]''' 01:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
19235 +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19232 +++$+++ 19234 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.310458020E09 +++$+++ I'm terrible at biographies, I tend not to actually like people, ha! But will definitely be happy to look at it. Cuyler Reynolds may be worthy of an article too, seeing as how we use him as a reference for so many articles it only seems worthy. +++$+++ :::I'm terrible at biographies, I tend not to actually like people, ha! But will definitely be happy to look at it. Cuyler Reynolds may be worthy of an article too, seeing as how we use him as a reference for so many articles it only seems worthy.[[User:Camelbinky|Camelbinky]] ([[User talk:Camelbinky#top|talk]]) 01:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

281378 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-16 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.181992740E09 +++$+++ Hold off on the FAC for red cliffs.. I'm gonna write a new section about possible locations of the battle (email me if you want details; link on my talk page) and make one or two new maps.. but it make take me a few weeks to get around to it! Later,  +++$+++ Hold off on the FAC for red cliffs.. I'm gonna write a new section about possible locations of the battle (email me if you want details; link on my talk page) and make one or two new maps.. but it make take me a few weeks to get around to it! Later, [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 04:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
281379 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281378 +++$+++ 281378 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.181993100E09 +++$+++ Yes, I also thought a section about that is necessary. I guess great minds think alike XD  +++$+++ :Yes, I also thought a section about that is necessary. I guess great minds think alike XD [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 04:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

576757 +++$+++ Mike Cline +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576757 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-17 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.261112580E09 +++$+++ I have been toying with the idea of creating a series of Yellowstone specific navigation templates to be used on the now almost 200 articles directly or indirectly related to [[Yellowstone National Park]].  My first attempt is at: [[User talk:Mike Cline\/Articles Under Contemplation\/Template:Upper Geyser Basin]].  My vision is that there would be a series of templates that would organize all Yellowstone articles either by broad subject matter (Wildlife, etc.) or by locale (Upper Geyser Basin) as appropriate. Eventually, every Yellowstone article would include an appropriate NAVBOX template.  Let me know your thoughts, as this is my first navbox template, any suggestions or advice.  Thanks.-- +++$+++ I have been toying with the idea of creating a series of Yellowstone specific navigation templates to be used on the now almost 200 articles directly or indirectly related to [[Yellowstone National Park]].  My first attempt is at: [[User talk:Mike Cline/Articles Under Contemplation/Template:Upper Geyser Basin]].  My vision is that there would be a series of templates that would organize all Yellowstone articles either by broad subject matter (Wildlife, etc.) or by locale (Upper Geyser Basin) as appropriate. Eventually, every Yellowstone article would include an appropriate NAVBOX template.  Let me know your thoughts, as this is my first navbox template, any suggestions or advice.  Thanks.--[[User:Mike Cline|Mike Cline]] ([[User talk:Mike Cline|talk]]) 21:03, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
576758 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576757 +++$+++ 576757 +++$+++ 2009-12-19 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.261220280E09 +++$+++ Responded [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Mike_Cline#Navboxes here]-- +++$+++ :Responded [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mike_Cline#Navboxes here]--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 02:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
576759 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576757 +++$+++ 576757 +++$+++ 2009-11-01 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.257069240E09 +++$+++ Recent vandalism from IP 201.240.25.35 orginated from Lima Peru...cool...I even have S. Americans mad at me...so does User:Hipocrite it seems.-- +++$+++ :Recent vandalism from IP 201.240.25.35 orginated from Lima Peru...cool...I even have S. Americans mad at me...so does User:Hipocrite it seems.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 01:54, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

19236 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19236 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-11 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.310444640E09 +++$+++ I'll take a look at some of your other articles, if you think it would be helpful. I confess I'm skeptical that we would now lose much of value with such a rule, although I quickly grant that such a rule several years ago would have been a problem.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ I'll take a look at some of your other articles, if you think it would be helpful. I confess I'm skeptical that we would now lose much of value with such a rule, although I quickly grant that such a rule several years ago would have been a problem.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 21:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
19237 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19236 +++$+++ 19236 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.310446680E09 +++$+++ On the other side of the ledger, my strong interest is caused by [[Wikipedia:Vpm#Two_issues_involving_Requests_for_feedback|this]]:  in short [[Wikipedia:FEED|FEED]] is a mess, and if the community cannot come up with a solution, I'm going to abandon it. There will be literally hundreds of potential new editors asking for feedback and being summarily ignored. I suggest that is more damaging to the project than one or two stub articles that don't get pushed along. Why is it related? I spend far too much time reviewing a request at Feed, only to spend the time to inform them that without sources, their article isn't likely to survive. Yes, I could spend some time on one or two and help them find sources, but we get a hundred a week. if 2\/3 of them were headed off at the pass, and informed they need a source, before they take up time at FEED, maybe dealing with the rest would be more rewarding, and not causing the burnout that persuades contributor to leave.--<font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ :On the other side of the ledger, my strong interest is caused by [[Wikipedia:Vpm#Two_issues_involving_Requests_for_feedback|this]]:  in short [[Wikipedia:FEED|FEED]] is a mess, and if the community cannot come up with a solution, I'm going to abandon it. There will be literally hundreds of potential new editors asking for feedback and being summarily ignored. I suggest that is more damaging to the project than one or two stub articles that don't get pushed along. Why is it related? I spend far too much time reviewing a request at Feed, only to spend the time to inform them that without sources, their article isn't likely to survive. Yes, I could spend some time on one or two and help them find sources, but we get a hundred a week. if 2/3 of them were headed off at the pass, and informed they need a source, before they take up time at FEED, maybe dealing with the rest would be more rewarding, and not causing the burnout that persuades contributor to leave.--<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 21:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

19238 +++$+++ Eagles247 +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19238 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-16 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.310814000E09 +++$+++ No problem on the revert, I just want to clarify something. I believe the consensus at the Village Pump was that there should be no written policy that states \"while blocked you must not remove helpful information\"; instead it should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis without instruction creep. ''' +++$+++ No problem on the revert, I just want to clarify something. I believe the consensus at the Village Pump was that there should be no written policy that states "while blocked you must not remove helpful information"; instead it should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis without instruction creep. '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 04:00, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
19239 +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19238 +++$+++ 19238 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.310815620E09 +++$+++ You may actually be correct, while consensus was that it shouldnt be done there may have been a further breakdown on who wanted it written and who wanted it dealt as you said on a case by case basis, a breakdown I did not take into account when implementing. I'll self-revert. +++$+++ :You may actually be correct, while consensus was that it shouldnt be done there may have been a further breakdown on who wanted it written and who wanted it dealt as you said on a case by case basis, a breakdown I did not take into account when implementing. I'll self-revert.[[User:Camelbinky|Camelbinky]] ([[User talk:Camelbinky#top|talk]]) 04:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
19240 +++$+++ Eagles247 +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19238 +++$+++ 19239 +++$+++ 2011-07-16 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.310815980E09 +++$+++ Thanks. ''' +++$+++ ::Thanks. '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 04:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

19241 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19241 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311748080E09 +++$+++ Exactly what you said at ANI is [http:\/\/wikipediareview.com\/index.php?s=&showtopic=34405&view=findpost&p=281288 here]. I can't say i'm terribly surprised. <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ Exactly what you said at ANI is [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=34405&view=findpost&p=281288 here]. I can't say i'm terribly surprised. <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 23:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
19242 +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19241 +++$+++ 19241 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.311770640E09 +++$+++ I've never used Wikipedia Review, and only have heard about \"well xy said yz there\" but since it isnt \"usable\" at Wikipedia for any purposes of \"discipline\" I have never before gone there, so I'm a bit confused what I'm looking at. Can you be a bit more specific about what I should be keeping an eye out for? Did someone quote me? If you you are saying I copy pasted myself there or that I wrote something there, I can assure you that I do not edit there and have never. So if you dont mind letting me know what I'm looking at. +++$+++ :I've never used Wikipedia Review, and only have heard about "well xy said yz there" but since it isnt "usable" at Wikipedia for any purposes of "discipline" I have never before gone there, so I'm a bit confused what I'm looking at. Can you be a bit more specific about what I should be keeping an eye out for? Did someone quote me? If you you are saying I copy pasted myself there or that I wrote something there, I can assure you that I do not edit there and have never. So if you dont mind letting me know what I'm looking at.[[User:Camelbinky|Camelbinky]] ([[User talk:Camelbinky#top|talk]]) 05:44, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
19243 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19241 +++$+++ 19242 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.311828840E09 +++$+++ No, I was just referring to your comment about Tarc and the last of a 24 hour ban or anything and how it would make those like him think they can do whatever they want. That link should take you to Tarc's comment that he made after the ANI discussion was closed. <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ ::No, I was just referring to your comment about Tarc and the last of a 24 hour ban or anything and how it would make those like him think they can do whatever they want. That link should take you to Tarc's comment that he made after the ANI discussion was closed. <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 21:54, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
19244 +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19241 +++$+++ 19243 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311854640E09 +++$+++ Ah, yes, I understand now. Well there's alot I would love to say about it but of course I cant or else Ill be blocked. Ironic. Wish there was more to be done. :( +++$+++ :::Ah, yes, I understand now. Well there's alot I would love to say about it but of course I cant or else Ill be blocked. Ironic. Wish there was more to be done. :([[User:Camelbinky|Camelbinky]] ([[User talk:Camelbinky#top|talk]]) 05:04, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
19245 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Camelbinky +++$+++ 19241 +++$+++ 19244 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 06:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311858120E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I just wanted to let you know about it, since you got pretty much the last word in the AfD. <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ ::::Yeah, I just wanted to let you know about it, since you got pretty much the last word in the AfD. <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 06:02, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

281386 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-23 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.182638340E09 +++$+++ Hey I think tone marks should be presented once for the name of the article's subject, at the top of the article. An article about Zhuge Liang, then, would have tone marks once and only once for his name, but no tone marks elsewhere... hmmmm... but then again I think tone marks on all the other names.. style names etc.. would be good. Keep those in the infobox... Wikipedia is an information source.  +++$+++ Hey I think tone marks should be presented once for the name of the article's subject, at the top of the article. An article about Zhuge Liang, then, would have tone marks once and only once for his name, but no tone marks elsewhere... hmmmm... but then again I think tone marks on all the other names.. style names etc.. would be good. Keep those in the infobox... Wikipedia is an information source. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 15:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
281387 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281386 +++$+++ 281386 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.182661200E09 +++$+++ That's what I mean, keep them in the infobox. I'll try to reword that section on the WikiProject to make that clear.  +++$+++ :That's what I mean, keep them in the infobox. I'll try to reword that section on the WikiProject to make that clear. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

543531 +++$+++ David D. +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-12 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.152744540E09 +++$+++ I'm playing devils advocate here since I'm not sure this is a great source, nevertheless it does seem to address more than just alternaive medicines in general.  +++$+++ I'm playing devils advocate here since I'm not sure this is a great source, nevertheless it does seem to address more than just alternaive medicines in general. [[User:David D.|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.|(Talk)]] 15:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
543532 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543531 +++$+++ 543531 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.152745620E09 +++$+++ I don't know. It is ambiguous. Does it mean that alt. med. is growing in popularity and some examples of alt. med. are homeopathy and acupuncture, or does it mean that acupuncture and homeopathy are examples of alt. med. that are growing in popularity? You can read it either way. We need a better source. I found one that said overall alt. med. usage has not increased in the USA since 1997 but I can't get full text to find the specific homeopathy figures.-- +++$+++ :I don't know. It is ambiguous. Does it mean that alt. med. is growing in popularity and some examples of alt. med. are homeopathy and acupuncture, or does it mean that acupuncture and homeopathy are examples of alt. med. that are growing in popularity? You can read it either way. We need a better source. I found one that said overall alt. med. usage has not increased in the USA since 1997 but I can't get full text to find the specific homeopathy figures.--[[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 16:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
543533 +++$+++ David D. +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543531 +++$+++ 543532 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.152748440E09 +++$+++ That link goes to nowhere.  i may be able to download it here. Can you give me the link to the abstract page?  +++$+++ ::That link goes to nowhere.  i may be able to download it here. Can you give me the link to the abstract page? [[User:David D.|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.|(Talk)]] 16:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

543534 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-12 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.152749100E09 +++$+++ Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997-2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;11(1):42-9. PMID: 15712765  -- +++$+++ Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997-2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;11(1):42-9. PMID: 15712765  --[[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 17:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
543535 +++$+++ David D. +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543534 +++$+++ 543534 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.152750180E09 +++$+++ Sorry, can't get that one.  +++$+++ :Sorry, can't get that one. [[User:David D.|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.|(Talk)]] 17:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
543536 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543534 +++$+++ 543534 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.152750540E09 +++$+++ Maybe Peter will find something.-- +++$+++ :Maybe Peter will find something.--[[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 17:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
543537 +++$+++ T.J.C. +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543534 +++$+++ 543534 +++$+++ 2006-07-12 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.152768000E09 +++$+++ I have access to the full text of this article. It specifically claims that homeopathy use fell from 3.7% to 1.4% in the U.S. between 1997 and 2002 (pg 47), and this change was statistically significant. Let me know if you want me to send you the PDF.  +++$+++ :I have access to the full text of this article. It specifically claims that homeopathy use fell from 3.7% to 1.4% in the U.S. between 1997 and 2002 (pg 47), and this change was statistically significant. Let me know if you want me to send you the PDF. [[User:T.J.C.|T.J.C.]] 22:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
543538 +++$+++ Peter morrell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543534 +++$+++ 543534 +++$+++ 2006-07-13 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.152826740E09 +++$+++ Tim, I have now sent you some data privately by email; I hope it is of some use. Please also note that some data and a citation has been removed about the numbers of homeopaths amnd homeopathic doctors and also an entire graph of the growth of RSHom homeopaths...if you go back far enough in the history you will find them...maybe these need to be added back in. Just a thought. The reason why homeopathy is statis in the US is that it is not licensed in many States and thus no surprise that there are so few practitioners. best!  +++$+++ :Tim, I have now sent you some data privately by email; I hope it is of some use. Please also note that some data and a citation has been removed about the numbers of homeopaths amnd homeopathic doctors and also an entire graph of the growth of RSHom homeopaths...if you go back far enough in the history you will find them...maybe these need to be added back in. Just a thought. The reason why homeopathy is statis in the US is that it is not licensed in many States and thus no surprise that there are so few practitioners. best! [[User talk:Peter morrell|Peter morrell]] 14:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
543539 +++$+++ Peter morrell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543534 +++$+++ 543538 +++$+++ 2006-07-13 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.152839460E09 +++$+++ you've done a good job, Tim, it looks much better! thx  +++$+++ ::you've done a good job, Tim, it looks much better! thx [[User talk:Peter morrell|Peter morrell]] 18:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

281391 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281391 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-30 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.183187400E09 +++$+++ Welcome Back? was that directed toward me? haha...  +++$+++ Welcome Back? was that directed toward me? haha... [[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 00:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
281392 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281391 +++$+++ 281391 +++$+++ 2007-06-30 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.183266360E09 +++$+++ Yeah, hey.  +++$+++ :Yeah, hey. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
281393 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281391 +++$+++ 281392 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.183279380E09 +++$+++ Oh, okay, hey. -- +++$+++ ::Oh, okay, hey. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 01:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
281394 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281391 +++$+++ 281391 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.183329900E09 +++$+++ [[User:Ling.Nut\/SandBox3|workpage]].  +++$+++ * [[User:Ling.Nut/SandBox3|workpage]]. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 15:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
281395 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281391 +++$+++ 281391 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.183349340E09 +++$+++ I'm really bad with Chinese geography, so I can't really be of help here. Many articles I've seen mention  archaeological finds at Puqi in the 1970's, so that should be included if the appropriate source is found. It might also help if we can find the official government announcement stating the renaming of the city...  +++$+++ :I'm really bad with Chinese geography, so I can't really be of help here. Many articles I've seen mention  archaeological finds at Puqi in the 1970's, so that should be included if the appropriate source is found. It might also help if we can find the official government announcement stating the renaming of the city... [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 21:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
281396 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281391 +++$+++ 281395 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.183349640E09 +++$+++ If you have or can find any reliable articles..oops are they in Eng. or Chinese..? .. I was gonna say email them to me... but a ''Chinese'' article would take me and my dictionary days to decipher (incorrectly) :-). So if you know of English articles, let me know...  +++$+++ ::If you have or can find any reliable articles..oops are they in Eng. or Chinese..? .. I was gonna say email them to me... but a ''Chinese'' article would take me and my dictionary days to decipher (incorrectly) :-). So if you know of English articles, let me know... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 21:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
281397 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281391 +++$+++ 281396 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.183349880E09 +++$+++ Likewise, if you find any Chinese article that you suspect might be relevent, you can send them to me and I will be happy to analyze them for you :)  +++$+++ :::Likewise, if you find any Chinese article that you suspect might be relevent, you can send them to me and I will be happy to analyze them for you :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 21:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

19248 +++$+++ Ebattalio +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-18 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.298096400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your work!  +++$+++ Thanks for your work! [[User:Ebattalio|Ebattalio]] ([[User talk:Ebattalio|talk]]) 22:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
19249 +++$+++ Ebattalio +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19248 +++$+++ 19248 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.298423340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for updating the topic!  +++$+++ :Thanks for updating the topic! [[User:Ebattalio|Ebattalio]] ([[User talk:Ebattalio|talk]]) 17:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

527496 +++$+++ Danielrocks123 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-07 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.173331920E09 +++$+++ Hi ^demon.  I was wondering why there haven't been any new cases added for mediation recently.  Does it have something to do with the bot, or what?  Regards. -- +++$+++ Hi ^demon.  I was wondering why there haven't been any new cases added for mediation recently.  Does it have something to do with the bot, or what?  Regards. --[[User:Danielrocks123|דניאל - Danielr]]'''[[User talk:Danielrocks123|ocks123]]''' <sup>[[Special:contributions/Danielrocks123|contribs]]</sup> 21:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
527497 +++$+++ Danielrocks123 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527496 +++$+++ 527496 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.173340800E09 +++$+++ Fair enough.  Thanks for the reply.  -- +++$+++ :Fair enough.  Thanks for the reply.  --[[User:Danielrocks123|דניאל - Danielr]]'''[[User talk:Danielrocks123|ocks123]]''' <sup>[[Special:contributions/Danielrocks123|contribs]]</sup> 00:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

19251 +++$+++ BD2412 +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19251 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-21 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.298353440E09 +++$+++ Greetings! [[Direct-controlled municipality]] is not proper subject for a disambiguation page, because the various entities listed on the page are all the same kind of thing (a governmental subdivision), and therefore are not ambiguous in the sense that a link to this page would be incorrect. Disambiguation here is no more correct than disambiguation of [[Soft drink]] to a list of soft drinks. Cheers!  +++$+++ Greetings! [[Direct-controlled municipality]] is not proper subject for a disambiguation page, because the various entities listed on the page are all the same kind of thing (a governmental subdivision), and therefore are not ambiguous in the sense that a link to this page would be incorrect. Disambiguation here is no more correct than disambiguation of [[Soft drink]] to a list of soft drinks. Cheers! [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:tan">'''''bd2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 21:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
19252 +++$+++ BD2412 +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19251 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.298419320E09 +++$+++ Yes, it is just the dab tag. Putting that on the page lights up every link to the page as an error requiring repair, even if it isn't. Cheers!  +++$+++ :: Yes, it is just the dab tag. Putting that on the page lights up every link to the page as an error requiring repair, even if it isn't. Cheers! [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:tan">'''''bd2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 16:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

543540 +++$+++ Homy +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543540 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-17 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.155855000E09 +++$+++ Tim, would you care to explain which partions in version of [[user:Homy\/homeopathy]] YOU consider POV ? May I remind you that homeopathy is a developing \"science\" with lots of opinions which may be presented in Wiki.   -- +++$+++ Tim, would you care to explain which partions in version of [[user:Homy/homeopathy]] YOU consider POV ? May I remind you that homeopathy is a developing "science" with lots of opinions which may be presented in Wiki.   --[[User:Homy|Homy]] 15:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
543541 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543540 +++$+++ 543540 +++$+++ 2006-08-17 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.155856260E09 +++$+++ Starting at the beginning, what was your reason for removing the last paragraph of the introduction?  +++$+++ :Starting at the beginning, what was your reason for removing the last paragraph of the introduction? [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 16:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
543542 +++$+++ Homy +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543540 +++$+++ 543541 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 06:40:00 +++$+++ 1.155908400E09 +++$+++ Because it was not NPOV (it was POV by selecting sources, my version can be debated)   -- +++$+++ ::Because it was not NPOV (it was POV by selecting sources, my version can be debated)   --[[User:Homy|Homy]] 06:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
543543 +++$+++ Homy +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543540 +++$+++ 543542 +++$+++ 2006-08-18 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.155909360E09 +++$+++ By the way I made a first sector of it because there are more than 4 reasons, but all need proper context.    High regards    -- +++$+++ :::By the way I made a first sector of it because there are more than 4 reasons, but all need proper context.    High regards    --[[User:Homy|Homy]] 06:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

281398 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-01 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.183350780E09 +++$+++ (undent) Actually, there seem to be ''several'' available via a couple of subscription-based databases.. um... see for example '''[http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar?q=%E8%B5%A4%E5%A3%81%E4%B9%8B%E6%88%B0&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search here]''' ... but I wouldn't know how to separate the big fish (well-known scholars and well-known journals) from the little ones...  +++$+++ (undent) Actually, there seem to be ''several'' available via a couple of subscription-based databases.. um... see for example '''[http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%E8%B5%A4%E5%A3%81%E4%B9%8B%E6%88%B0&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search here]''' ... but I wouldn't know how to separate the big fish (well-known scholars and well-known journals) from the little ones... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 21:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
281399 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281398 +++$+++ 281398 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.183353780E09 +++$+++ The stuff there seems to focus on the novel rather than history. Most of them are rather irrelevent, like \"How to teach the Battle of Chibi to children\", \"Copyright infringements after the destruction of the panoramic Battle of Chibi painting\", \"How did Zhuge Liang persuade Wu to fight\", \"Learning from Chibi about firefighting on water\"....etc. There's one talking about geography here: [http:\/\/www.wanfangdata.com.cn\/qikan\/periodical.articles\/zglsdllc\/zgls2005\/0501\/050121.htm] but it appears to be a fringe theory.  +++$+++ :The stuff there seems to focus on the novel rather than history. Most of them are rather irrelevent, like "How to teach the Battle of Chibi to children", "Copyright infringements after the destruction of the panoramic Battle of Chibi painting", "How did Zhuge Liang persuade Wu to fight", "Learning from Chibi about firefighting on water"....etc. There's one talking about geography here: [http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/qikan/periodical.articles/zglsdllc/zgls2005/0501/050121.htm] but it appears to be a fringe theory. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
281400 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281398 +++$+++ 281399 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.183356600E09 +++$+++ The scholar.ilib.cn database offers \"related links\": See '''[http:\/\/scholar.ilib.cn\/A-jzsfxyxb-shkxb200106023.html this]''' and its links at the bottom of the page... anything look useful in any way?  +++$+++ :: The scholar.ilib.cn database offers "related links": See '''[http://scholar.ilib.cn/A-jzsfxyxb-shkxb200106023.html this]''' and its links at the bottom of the page... anything look useful in any way? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 23:10, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
281401 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281398 +++$+++ 281400 +++$+++ 2007-07-01 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.183359480E09 +++$+++ The first five related links look useful at a first glance. But forgive me, I'm not quite willing to subscribe to their databases.... +++$+++ :::The first five related links look useful at a first glance. But forgive me, I'm not quite willing to subscribe to their databases....[[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 23:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

19256 +++$+++ Jetstreamer +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-30 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.301514360E09 +++$+++ China was just taken as an example. Other could be the Democratic Republic of the Congo.-- +++$+++ China was just taken as an example. Other could be the Democratic Republic of the Congo.--[[User:Jetstreamer|Jetstreamer]] ([[User talk:Jetstreamer|talk]]) 12:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
19257 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19256 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.303817340E09 +++$+++ Schmucky, you're really not supposed to post someone's email without permission per [[Wikipedia:EMAIL#Abuse_handling|this]]. As for what to do, I would really consider contacting ArbCom about this, especially since the user you mentioned was previously the subject of a case. And I would also redact the email above.  +++$+++ ::Schmucky, you're really not supposed to post someone's email without permission per [[Wikipedia:EMAIL#Abuse_handling|this]]. As for what to do, I would really consider contacting ArbCom about this, especially since the user you mentioned was previously the subject of a case. And I would also redact the email above. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 04:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
19258 +++$+++ Phantomsteve +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19256 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.303818180E09 +++$+++ I have removed the email per the quoted guidelines, and will remove it from this page's history. ''''' +++$+++ :::I have removed the email per the quoted guidelines, and will remove it from this page's history. '''''[[User:Phantomsteve|<font color="#307D7E">Phantom</font><font color="#55CAFA">Steve</font>]]'''''/[[User talk:Phantomsteve|<font color="#008000">talk</font>]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Phantomsteve|<font color="#000080">contribs</font>]]\ 04:43, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

543545 +++$+++ Hylas Chung +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543545 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-18 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.153222200E09 +++$+++ Hello Tim. I am making new edits. I do not want to make reversion wars. If you revert I will not make rushed reverts. Here is a good article. [http:\/\/www.srmhp.org\/0101\/raison-detre.html]. It talks of dangers with unvalidated methods. The author talks of homeopathy in other articles. It applies here also.  +++$+++ Hello Tim. I am making new edits. I do not want to make reversion wars. If you revert I will not make rushed reverts. Here is a good article. [http://www.srmhp.org/0101/raison-detre.html]. It talks of dangers with unvalidated methods. The author talks of homeopathy in other articles. It applies here also. [[User:Hylas Chung|Hylas Chung]] 04:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
543546 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543545 +++$+++ 543545 +++$+++ 2006-07-18 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.153263060E09 +++$+++ Hi there, it is good to get a wide range of peole interested in this. However, please be conservative with this article since there seems to be strong feelings on both sides which could indeed lead to edit wars if we do not attempt to reach consensus. -- +++$+++ :Hi there, it is good to get a wide range of peole interested in this. However, please be conservative with this article since there seems to be strong feelings on both sides which could indeed lead to edit wars if we do not attempt to reach consensus. --[[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 15:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

281402 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281402 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-02 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.183362360E09 +++$+++ (undent) There's nothing to forgive. :-) I would be ''extremely'' reluctant to subscribe to anything, too, if it cost money to do so. Sometimes (rarely) these things are free; you just need to provide them with a valid email address that they can spam from here to eternity...  +++$+++ (undent) There's nothing to forgive. :-) I would be ''extremely'' reluctant to subscribe to anything, too, if it cost money to do so. Sometimes (rarely) these things are free; you just need to provide them with a valid email address that they can spam from here to eternity... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 00:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
281403 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281402 +++$+++ 281402 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.183364280E09 +++$+++ The databases here in this case do cost money. But I just realized that I can exploit my student status to access my university's databases freely, so I'll see how that goes :)  +++$+++ :The databases here in this case do cost money. But I just realized that I can exploit my student status to access my university's databases freely, so I'll see how that goes :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 01:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
281404 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281402 +++$+++ 281402 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.183371420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ * [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 03:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
281405 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281402 +++$+++ 281402 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.183373280E09 +++$+++ For some odd reason, my uni's Asian Library has those authors, but our collection of their works center around the cultures of China rather than Chinese history.... +++$+++ :For some odd reason, my uni's Asian Library has those authors, but our collection of their works center around the cultures of China rather than Chinese history....[[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 03:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
281406 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281402 +++$+++ 281405 +++$+++ 2007-07-02 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.183373640E09 +++$+++ And the Red Cliffs articles I can find...they all deal with Su Shi's poem.  +++$+++ ::And the Red Cliffs articles I can find...they all deal with Su Shi's poem. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 03:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

90591 +++$+++ Awadewit +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-13 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.218663540E09 +++$+++ Remember long ago you promised to be the techie for the copyediting podcast I wanted to do? If you are still willing to do that, please sign up [[User:Scartol\/canvas|here]]. Thanks!  +++$+++ Remember long ago you promised to be the techie for the copyediting podcast I wanted to do? If you are still willing to do that, please sign up [[User:Scartol/canvas|here]]. Thanks! [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] ([[User talk:Awadewit|talk]]) 14:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
90592 +++$+++ Scartol +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90591 +++$+++ 90591 +++$+++ 2008-08-19 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.219205280E09 +++$+++ We've got a finalized date and time for the podcast chat, so visit [[User:Scartol\/canvas|the page]] and sign up to confirm!  +++$+++ :We've got a finalized date and time for the podcast chat, so visit [[User:Scartol/canvas|the page]] and sign up to confirm! [[User:Scartol|<span style="color:#060">Scartol</span>]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:Scartol|<span style="color:#060"><small>Tok</small></span>]] 21:08, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
90593 +++$+++ Scartol +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90591 +++$+++ 90592 +++$+++ 2008-08-20 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.219227060E09 +++$+++ I've never set up a Skypecast before. Are you willing to handle that aspect of it, or should I just suck it up and figure it out? =) Thanks for your help on this.  +++$+++ ::I've never set up a Skypecast before. Are you willing to handle that aspect of it, or should I just suck it up and figure it out? =) Thanks for your help on this. [[User:Scartol|<span style="color:#060">Scartol</span>]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:Scartol|<span style="color:#060"><small>Tok</small></span>]] 03:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
90594 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90591 +++$+++ 90593 +++$+++ 2008-08-20 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.219258680E09 +++$+++ Just give me a time and I will be there to help you guys. It is not hard but first time or two there can be some gotchas that you need to be walked through. --[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] |  +++$+++ :::Just give me a time and I will be there to help you guys. It is not hard but first time or two there can be some gotchas that you need to be walked through. --[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] | [[User:Filll/WP Challenge|<font color="Green"><small>wpc</small></font>]]) 11:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
90595 +++$+++ Scartol +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90591 +++$+++ 90594 +++$+++ 2008-08-24 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.219616160E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for being the tech guy. What's the next step? Should I make my recording into an mp3, or do you do that?  +++$+++ ::::Thanks again for being the tech guy. What's the next step? Should I make my recording into an mp3, or do you do that? [[User:Scartol|<span style="color:#060">Scartol</span>]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:Scartol|<span style="color:#060"><small>Tok</small></span>]] 15:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

19260 +++$+++ Qwyrxian +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-07 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.304806020E09 +++$+++ Who's the banned user you're reverting on all of those different China\/border articles?  I'm seeing a lot of changes from that user pop up on Huggle, but without knowing who the banned user is, I'm uncomfortable just reverting without knowledge of the topic.  +++$+++ Who's the banned user you're reverting on all of those different China/border articles?  I'm seeing a lot of changes from that user pop up on Huggle, but without knowing who the banned user is, I'm uncomfortable just reverting without knowledge of the topic. [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 15:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
19261 +++$+++ Qwyrxian +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19260 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.304810520E09 +++$+++ I'm done Huggling for the night...you may want to try to get some admin eyes looking at these edits to see if this is, indeed, a banned user that needs blocking.  I was doubtful, then your explanation seemed to make sense, but now I'm not sure again.  Hopefully, another user with experience with the banned user can make the clear cut call.   +++$+++ ::I'm done Huggling for the night...you may want to try to get some admin eyes looking at these edits to see if this is, indeed, a banned user that needs blocking.  I was doubtful, then your explanation seemed to make sense, but now I'm not sure again.  Hopefully, another user with experience with the banned user can make the clear cut call.  [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 16:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

19263 +++$+++ Mato +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-07 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.304813640E09 +++$+++ I'd suggest you stop reverting the edits over at [[Sha Tau Kok Control Point]] and similar articles, as the edits aren't vandalism and you're violating the three-revert rule.  +++$+++ I'd suggest you stop reverting the edits over at [[Sha Tau Kok Control Point]] and similar articles, as the edits aren't vandalism and you're violating the three-revert rule. [[User:Mato|Mato]] ([[User talk:Mato|talk]]) 17:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
19264 +++$+++ Mato +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19263 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.304813820E09 +++$+++ Which banned user is the IP a sock puppet of? Perhaps it might be a good idea to mention this in the edit summaries. Have you reported the IP as a suspected sock puppet?  +++$+++ ::Which banned user is the IP a sock puppet of? Perhaps it might be a good idea to mention this in the edit summaries. Have you reported the IP as a suspected sock puppet? [[User:Mato|Mato]] ([[User talk:Mato|talk]]) 17:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
19265 +++$+++ Mato +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19263 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.304814540E09 +++$+++ You're right I've been stupid here on numerous levels - my apologies. I've reported the user at [[WP:AIV]] to hopefully stop them for the time being.  +++$+++ ::::You're right I've been stupid here on numerous levels - my apologies. I've reported the user at [[WP:AIV]] to hopefully stop them for the time being. [[User:Mato|Mato]] ([[User talk:Mato|talk]]) 17:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
19266 +++$+++ Mato +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19263 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.304815140E09 +++$+++ User is blocked (for now) so might make it easier to clean up the mess!  +++$+++ ::::::User is blocked (for now) so might make it easier to clean up the mess! [[User:Mato|Mato]] ([[User talk:Mato|talk]]) 17:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
19267 +++$+++ N419BH +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19263 +++$+++ 19263 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.304823900E09 +++$+++ I have contested the speedy deletion as being a POV fork isn't a valid ground for speedy deletion. For what it's worth though continually removing CSD tags really isn't appropriate. Let the admin figure it out. <span style=\"font-size:smaller;font-family:'arial bold',sans-serif;border:1px solid Black;\"> +++$+++ :I have contested the speedy deletion as being a POV fork isn't a valid ground for speedy deletion. For what it's worth though continually removing CSD tags really isn't appropriate. Let the admin figure it out. <span style="font-size:smaller;font-family:'arial bold',sans-serif;border:1px solid Black;">[[User:N419BH|<span style="color:Black;background:#FFD700;">N419</span>]][[User talk:N419BH|<span style="background:Black;color:#FFD700;">BH</span>]]</span> 20:05, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

281408 +++$+++ Skysmith +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.183567560E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help. I'll update the page later -  +++$+++ Thanks for the help. I'll update the page later - [[User:Skysmith|Skysmith]] 09:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
281409 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281408 +++$+++ 281408 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.183698180E09 +++$+++ I really had high hopes for the \"location\" section; but not enough sources. Looks like it's gonna be skimpy..  +++$+++ * I really had high hopes for the "location" section; but not enough sources. Looks like it's gonna be skimpy.. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 22:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
281410 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281408 +++$+++ 281408 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.183706220E09 +++$+++ Add a map showing where the locations are, maybe?  +++$+++ :Add a map showing where the locations are, maybe? [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 00:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
281411 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281408 +++$+++ 281410 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.183708320E09 +++$+++ Sure, no prob. But I think some people support Jiayu as an option.. but I can't find sources. I don't even think I can mention it! And I don't even really have a wealth of sources to support Chibi City (Puqi, that is). I'm disappointed. :-( But I'll make the best of what I have...  +++$+++ ::Sure, no prob. But I think some people support Jiayu as an option.. but I can't find sources. I don't even think I can mention it! And I don't even really have a wealth of sources to support Chibi City (Puqi, that is). I'm disappointed. :-( But I'll make the best of what I have... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 00:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
281412 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281408 +++$+++ 281411 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.183709700E09 +++$+++ Maybe we can translate the section on geography from the Chinese Wikipedia on Red Cliff, it's sourced, at least.  +++$+++ :::Maybe we can translate the section on geography from the Chinese Wikipedia on Red Cliff, it's sourced, at least. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 01:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

349803 +++$+++ Jmh649 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ 349803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-17 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.266457920E09 +++$+++ Wishing to add a link to DiagnosisPro to the infobox.  This provides an exhaustive differential which will hopefully allow us to removed the long lists from many articles.  I see you have worked on these templates in the past.  Any comments and would you be able to help in the implementation of this?  Not sure how to program the template.-- +++$+++ Wishing to add a link to DiagnosisPro to the infobox.  This provides an exhaustive differential which will hopefully allow us to removed the long lists from many articles.  I see you have worked on these templates in the past.  Any comments and would you be able to help in the implementation of this?  Not sure how to program the template.--[[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 17:52, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
349804 +++$+++ Jmh649 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ 349803 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.266728220E09 +++$+++ Hey David What is the next step from here? +++$+++ ::Hey David What is the next step from here?[[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 20:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
349805 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ 349803 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-21 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.266750780E09 +++$+++ I was sort of hoping might get at least a couple other editors to comment\/agree on proposal, rather than just the two of us acting alone\/in a void. I'm gonna be busy next couple days, so if no further action at [[Template_talk:Infobox_symptom#Differential_diagnosis]] by then (and allowing the proposal about a week), then I'll enact the coding :-)  +++$+++ :::I was sort of hoping might get at least a couple other editors to comment/agree on proposal, rather than just the two of us acting alone/in a void. I'm gonna be busy next couple days, so if no further action at [[Template_talk:Infobox_symptom#Differential_diagnosis]] by then (and allowing the proposal about a week), then I'll enact the coding :-) [[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 03:13, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
349806 +++$+++ Jmh649 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ 349803 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-02-21 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.266752100E09 +++$+++ Yes sounds good. There are a couple more comments here [[Wikipedia_talk:MED#Differential_diagnosis_in_the_disease_box.3F]].  +++$+++ ::::Yes sounds good. There are a couple more comments here [[Wikipedia_talk:MED#Differential_diagnosis_in_the_disease_box.3F]]. [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 03:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

19269 +++$+++ Martinoei +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-08 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.304902260E09 +++$+++ This is the second warning. stubbornness is not allowed in the wikipedia. I hope you can stop your vandalism. No one wants to waste the time on editing war.  +++$+++ This is the second warning. stubbornness is not allowed in the wikipedia. I hope you can stop your vandalism. No one wants to waste the time on editing war. [[User:Martinoei|Martinoei]] ([[User talk:Martinoei|talk]]) 17:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
19270 +++$+++ Martinoei +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19269 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.304945700E09 +++$+++ This is the final written warning from me. You can ignore this, but our friend and I well prepare to complain your vandalism. Please respect yourself.  +++$+++ :: This is the final written warning from me. You can ignore this, but our friend and I well prepare to complain your vandalism. Please respect yourself. [[User:Martinoei|Martinoei]] ([[User talk:Martinoei|talk]]) 05:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

541842 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541842 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-04 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.178337060E09 +++$+++ The image licence is a bit confusing. You say that it has been released for use only on Wikipedia, yet also say that you have released it under the GNU Free Documentation Licence. These are incompatible statements. Could you please review the [[GFDL]] and clarify under what terms this image has been released? Thanks! <span style=\"font: small-caps 1em Optima\"> +++$+++ The image licence is a bit confusing. You say that it has been released for use only on Wikipedia, yet also say that you have released it under the GNU Free Documentation Licence. These are incompatible statements. Could you please review the [[GFDL]] and clarify under what terms this image has been released? Thanks! <span style="font: small-caps 1em Optima">[[User_talk:Sanchom|Sancho]] ([[Wikipedia:Editor_review/Sanchom|Review me]])</span> 20:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
541843 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541842 +++$+++ 541842 +++$+++ 2007-05-04 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.178342100E09 +++$+++ Okay, I can change it for you. I just wanted to check what your intention was though... did you want it released under the GNU Free Documentation License? Are you ''able'' to release it under the GFDL?... it appears that the image is a modification of another image &mdash; you might not be able to release modifications to that original image under the GFDL. Basically the contradiction in your original licensing was that under the GFDL, users are free to use and modify the image and display it in places other than Wikipedia as long as they continue to license the downstream uses under the GFDL as well. I don't know if this is what you meant to allow. <span style=\"font: small-caps 1em Optima\"> +++$+++ *Okay, I can change it for you. I just wanted to check what your intention was though... did you want it released under the GNU Free Documentation License? Are you ''able'' to release it under the GFDL?... it appears that the image is a modification of another image &mdash; you might not be able to release modifications to that original image under the GFDL. Basically the contradiction in your original licensing was that under the GFDL, users are free to use and modify the image and display it in places other than Wikipedia as long as they continue to license the downstream uses under the GFDL as well. I don't know if this is what you meant to allow. <span style="font: small-caps 1em Optima">[[User_talk:Sanchom|Sancho]] ([[Wikipedia:Editor_review/Sanchom|Review me]])</span> 22:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
541844 +++$+++ Sanchom +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541842 +++$+++ 541842 +++$+++ 2007-05-06 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.178490660E09 +++$+++ Please let me know. Thanks, <span style=\"font: small-caps 1em Optima\"> +++$+++ *Please let me know. Thanks, <span style="font: small-caps 1em Optima">[[User_talk:Sanchom|Sancho]]</span> 15:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
541845 +++$+++ Sanchom +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541842 +++$+++ 541844 +++$+++ 2007-05-07 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.178528700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking the time to think about this and even propose a template that could be used. I think we should use the template you suggest, but also follow closely the discussion at [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Military-Insignia_.282nd_nomination.29]] to see if something better\/more correct comes out of the discussion. <span style=\"font: small-caps 1em Optima\"> +++$+++ **Thanks for taking the time to think about this and even propose a template that could be used. I think we should use the template you suggest, but also follow closely the discussion at [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Military-Insignia_.282nd_nomination.29]] to see if something better/more correct comes out of the discussion. <span style="font: small-caps 1em Optima">[[User_talk:Sanchom|Sancho]]</span> 02:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

19271 +++$+++ Qwyrxian +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-09 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.304946720E09 +++$+++ {{tps}}Martinoei, please read [[WP:VANDAL]]. You may disagrees with SchmuckyTheCat, and, for all I know, you're right and Schmucky is wrong.  But, as you were already told at [[WP:AIV]] in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&direction=next&oldid=428114819 this diff], Schmucky's edits are not vandalism.  That term specifically refers only to actions by users ''intended'' to make the encyclopedia worse.  It sounds more like you're claiming that Schmucky is violating [[WP:NPOV]] or [[WP:OR]] (I'm not sure on the details); the places to discuss those are [[WP:NPOVN|The Neutral Point of View noticeboard]] and [[WP:ORN|The Original Research noticeboard]], respectively. Please, though, don't continue to use the term vandalism for this case, as doing so can sometimes be considered a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]].  Again, though, I have no opinion on which of you is right in this content dispute.   +++$+++ {{tps}}Martinoei, please read [[WP:VANDAL]]. You may disagrees with SchmuckyTheCat, and, for all I know, you're right and Schmucky is wrong.  But, as you were already told at [[WP:AIV]] in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&direction=next&oldid=428114819 this diff], Schmucky's edits are not vandalism.  That term specifically refers only to actions by users ''intended'' to make the encyclopedia worse.  It sounds more like you're claiming that Schmucky is violating [[WP:NPOV]] or [[WP:OR]] (I'm not sure on the details); the places to discuss those are [[WP:NPOVN|The Neutral Point of View noticeboard]] and [[WP:ORN|The Original Research noticeboard]], respectively. Please, though, don't continue to use the term vandalism for this case, as doing so can sometimes be considered a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]].  Again, though, I have no opinion on which of you is right in this content dispute.  [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 06:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
19272 +++$+++ Martinoei +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19271 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.304947860E09 +++$+++ Thank a lot for your kindly remind.  +++$+++ ::: Thank a lot for your kindly remind. [[User:Martinoei|Martinoei]] ([[User talk:Martinoei|talk]]) 06:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
19273 +++$+++ Martinoei +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19271 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.304948100E09 +++$+++ My focus is on Chinese version of wikipedia, not the English version. I revert your editing because so many my blog readers from Hong Kong seek my help to revert your groundless work. Could you mind to tell me why do you think you are right ? What theory or evidence can support your insulting edits? Your edits are insulting Hong Kong people seriously.  +++$+++ ::  My focus is on Chinese version of wikipedia, not the English version. I revert your editing because so many my blog readers from Hong Kong seek my help to revert your groundless work. Could you mind to tell me why do you think you are right ? What theory or evidence can support your insulting edits? Your edits are insulting Hong Kong people seriously. [[User:Martinoei|Martinoei]] ([[User talk:Martinoei|talk]]) 06:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
19274 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19271 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.304956740E09 +++$+++ Martin, are you saying you're here because you were canvassed off-site? If so, that's really not much worse than being a sockpuppet; you're basically acting as a [[Wikipedia:SOCK#Meatpuppetry|meatpuppet]]. As for your comment about \"insulting Hong Kong people\", Wikipedia policy is that content is based on reliable sources, not what is insulting to any group of people (for example, we refer to that landlocked country north of Greece as the Republic of Macedonia, even though that term seems to be offensive to many Greeks). So you'll need to base your arguments in fact, not feelings. (Like Qwyrxian, I'm really not taking sides between you and Schmucky here; just telling you how things work here.)  +++$+++ :::Martin, are you saying you're here because you were canvassed off-site? If so, that's really not much worse than being a sockpuppet; you're basically acting as a [[Wikipedia:SOCK#Meatpuppetry|meatpuppet]]. As for your comment about "insulting Hong Kong people", Wikipedia policy is that content is based on reliable sources, not what is insulting to any group of people (for example, we refer to that landlocked country north of Greece as the Republic of Macedonia, even though that term seems to be offensive to many Greeks). So you'll need to base your arguments in fact, not feelings. (Like Qwyrxian, I'm really not taking sides between you and Schmucky here; just telling you how things work here.) [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 08:59, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
19275 +++$+++ Martinoei +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19271 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.304973420E09 +++$+++ No Wikipedia editor or user is brainless and can be other user puppet easily. Someone tells me Schmuckycat groundless editing work in some pages. I examine the work of Schmucky carefully and finally conclude I have to take promote action to defend the related article. On the other hand, Schmucky proxy accusation itself does not assume the good faith. At this moment, I do not have solid evidence shows the Schmuckycat has any political intention behind its action. I want to listen his reasoning on his edit. I am still waiting hear any good news from him.  +++$+++ :::: No Wikipedia editor or user is brainless and can be other user puppet easily. Someone tells me Schmuckycat groundless editing work in some pages. I examine the work of Schmucky carefully and finally conclude I have to take promote action to defend the related article. On the other hand, Schmucky proxy accusation itself does not assume the good faith. At this moment, I do not have solid evidence shows the Schmuckycat has any political intention behind its action. I want to listen his reasoning on his edit. I am still waiting hear any good news from him. [[User:Martinoei|Martinoei]] ([[User talk:Martinoei|talk]]) 13:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
19276 +++$+++ Martinoei +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19271 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.304992020E09 +++$+++ All naming in Wikipedia is not based someone political view, this is only based on official document and common practice. Unfortunately, your reasoning without any official document to support. I read [[User:SchmuckyTheCat\/Mainland_China]] before I take action against your editing. Please do not impose your political point of view on other ones. You have no intention to talk to other uses, I do not waste my time in this talk page. I file the complain against you official. Someone told me that you usually threat to ban other users against your groundless editing in Wikipedia English. This is useless to me. Wikipedia English is not your personal playground.  +++$+++ :::::: All naming in Wikipedia is not based someone political view, this is only based on official document and common practice. Unfortunately, your reasoning without any official document to support. I read [[User:SchmuckyTheCat/Mainland_China]] before I take action against your editing. Please do not impose your political point of view on other ones. You have no intention to talk to other uses, I do not waste my time in this talk page. I file the complain against you official. Someone told me that you usually threat to ban other users against your groundless editing in Wikipedia English. This is useless to me. Wikipedia English is not your personal playground. [[User:Martinoei|Martinoei]] ([[User talk:Martinoei|talk]]) 18:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

281418 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-06 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.183744080E09 +++$+++ (undent) I renamed (moved) it to Chibi City. If the park is actually about Red Cliffs, then it deserves mention in both articles. I don't recall what the park theme was though. I'll look again some day.  +++$+++ (undent) I renamed (moved) it to Chibi City. If the park is actually about Red Cliffs, then it deserves mention in both articles. I don't recall what the park theme was though. I'll look again some day. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 10:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
281419 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281418 +++$+++ 281418 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.183744920E09 +++$+++ BTW, the Cao cao article has Red Cliffs \"northwest of Chibi City\", which means either Jiayu or Wuhan, unless it means just outside the Chibi City limits or some such...  +++$+++ :BTW, the Cao cao article has Red Cliffs "northwest of Chibi City", which means either Jiayu or Wuhan, unless it means just outside the Chibi City limits or some such... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 11:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
281420 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281418 +++$+++ 281419 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.183745100E09 +++$+++ You might want to ask someone else for this...my knowledge in Chinese geography is not so great. Find the person who originally put that in, I guess?  +++$+++ ::You might want to ask someone else for this...my knowledge in Chinese geography is not so great. Find the person who originally put that in, I guess? [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 11:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
281421 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281418 +++$+++ 281420 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.183745340E09 +++$+++ The Chinese wiki doesn't give Wuhan as a possible site, and Wuhan is definitely a minority view. But there is a local tradition to that effect, plus I found the relevant article somewhat convincing. :-) I don't wanna quote anything the Chinese wiki says unless we can track down the ''precise articles'' in which person A made assertion B.  +++$+++ :::The Chinese wiki doesn't give Wuhan as a possible site, and Wuhan is definitely a minority view. But there is a local tradition to that effect, plus I found the relevant article somewhat convincing. :-) I don't wanna quote anything the Chinese wiki says unless we can track down the ''precise articles'' in which person A made assertion B. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 11:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

177975 +++$+++ Raintheone +++$+++ AcidBrights +++$+++ 177975 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-21 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.292972700E09 +++$+++ Well I do think it's a good idea. I like the tables more. You know the infobox being removed, on the Neighbours ones we did it for guest appearances for like 1 - 2 episodes. But for now I guess it's okay. I'd much prefer it to have the same format as Neighbours, Junegloom worked really hard on it, it's just easier reading isn't it. One thing, you removed my aditions. :P I Archived the waveguide ref, and added new character Kelsey Alcroft. .. (Also don't suppose you fancy creating a table for the other characters of 2010??) +++$+++ Well I do think it's a good idea. I like the tables more. You know the infobox being removed, on the Neighbours ones we did it for guest appearances for like 1 - 2 episodes. But for now I guess it's okay. I'd much prefer it to have the same format as Neighbours, Junegloom worked really hard on it, it's just easier reading isn't it. One thing, you removed my aditions. :P I Archived the waveguide ref, and added new character Kelsey Alcroft. .. (Also don't suppose you fancy creating a table for the other characters of 2010??)[[User:Raintheone|'''<span style="color:blue;font-family:Modern">RAIN..the..ONE</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Raintheone|<font color="#AA22CC">'''HOTLINE'''</font>]]</sup> 15:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
177976 +++$+++ LostHavoc +++$+++ AcidBrights +++$+++ 177975 +++$+++ 177975 +++$+++ 2010-12-21 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.292975040E09 +++$+++ I apologise for creating the article before you AcidBrights haha :) Good work for the table for other characters anyway. <font face=\"Vivaldi\"> +++$+++ :I apologise for creating the article before you AcidBrights haha :) Good work for the table for other characters anyway. <font face="Vivaldi">[[User:LostHavoc|<span style="padding: 0 4px; color: #800080">'''LostHavoc'''</span>]][[User talk:LostHavoc|<span style="padding: 0 4px; color: #E0B0FF"><small>(talk)</small></span>]]</font> 15:44, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
177977 +++$+++ Raintheone +++$+++ AcidBrights +++$+++ 177975 +++$+++ 177976 +++$+++ 2010-12-29 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.293675360E09 +++$+++ I'll help with Suzanne, I've always tried tbh.. just no refs really. Maybe there are more, and with her return with an actual storyline in toe, that should help. +++$+++ ::I'll help with Suzanne, I've always tried tbh.. just no refs really. Maybe there are more, and with her return with an actual storyline in toe, that should help.[[User:Raintheone|'''<span style="color:blue;font-family:Modern">RAIN..the..ONE</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Raintheone|<font color="#AA22CC">'''HOTLINE'''</font>]]</sup> 18:16, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

543564 +++$+++ Darkliight +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543564 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-30 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.156981440E09 +++$+++ I still think some of the smaller 2-3 sentence paragraphs could be merged together. It's nothing major, but I'm afraid, as it stands, they make the article look a bit choppy. Also, and I won't object based on this, but the images in SVG format would be nice if you want to chase that up before the weekend. To answer your question, [[Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Format|Image use policy]] aside, the vector based images can be scaled\/resized without any loss of quality - so the smaller thumbnails won't look so fuzzy on the page, people can zoom in on the image to their hearts content (not so much of an issue with such simple images this time) and should anyone ever want to use them for any purpose outside of wikipedia - well, they'll be perfect for any application. Combined with the fact that users globally set size they want thumbnails to be viewed at and, well, SVGs were made for this. I'd love to discuss it more, but I need to get some sleep. There are many users that might be able to help you with the conversion - check the author of the SVGs from the FAC above yours, [[Star]], for instance - or run through the other current FACs for other people that might be able to help.  +++$+++ I still think some of the smaller 2-3 sentence paragraphs could be merged together. It's nothing major, but I'm afraid, as it stands, they make the article look a bit choppy. Also, and I won't object based on this, but the images in SVG format would be nice if you want to chase that up before the weekend. To answer your question, [[Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Format|Image use policy]] aside, the vector based images can be scaled/resized without any loss of quality - so the smaller thumbnails won't look so fuzzy on the page, people can zoom in on the image to their hearts content (not so much of an issue with such simple images this time) and should anyone ever want to use them for any purpose outside of wikipedia - well, they'll be perfect for any application. Combined with the fact that users globally set size they want thumbnails to be viewed at and, well, SVGs were made for this. I'd love to discuss it more, but I need to get some sleep. There are many users that might be able to help you with the conversion - check the author of the SVGs from the FAC above yours, [[Star]], for instance - or run through the other current FACs for other people that might be able to help. [[User:Darkliight|darkliight]]<sup>[[User_talk:Darkliight|[&pi;alk]]]</sup> 16:44, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
543565 +++$+++ Darkliight +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543564 +++$+++ 543564 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.157057640E09 +++$+++ You ''copied'' the png\/jpegs into illustrator and saved them as an svg?  +++$+++ :You ''copied'' the png/jpegs into illustrator and saved them as an svg? [[User:Darkliight|darkliight]]<sup>[[User_talk:Darkliight|[&pi;alk]]]</sup> 13:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
543566 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543564 +++$+++ 543564 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.157064600E09 +++$+++ For some of them yes, for others I have the original files.  +++$+++ :For some of them yes, for others I have the original files. [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 15:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

19277 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19277 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-09 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.305006960E09 +++$+++ What exactly does this mean?  +++$+++ What exactly does this mean? [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 22:56, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
19278 +++$+++ Fences and windows +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19277 +++$+++ 19277 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.305007860E09 +++$+++ I've removed it and another racial slur from your user page.  +++$+++ :I've removed it and another racial slur from your user page. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&amp;</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 23:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
19279 +++$+++ Shirt58 +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19277 +++$+++ 19278 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.305046020E09 +++$+++ {{tps}} SchmuckyTheCat, have you offered an explanation for \u7336\u592a\u9670\u8396\u8c93 yet?  I was going to so do (starting with * \u7336 - literally \"furthermore\", [[pinyin]] \"y\xf3u\" * \u592a - literally \"wide, expansive\", pinyin \"t\xe0i\"...) but I think it would be better if you did. -- +++$+++ ::{{tps}} SchmuckyTheCat, have you offered an explanation for 猶太陰莖貓 yet?  I was going to so do (starting with * 猶 - literally "furthermore", [[pinyin]] "yóu" * 太 - literally "wide, expansive", pinyin "tài"...) but I think it would be better if you did. --[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 09:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
19280 +++$+++ Shirt58 +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19277 +++$+++ 19277 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.305151620E09 +++$+++ If that's your choice, well, so be it. -- +++$+++ :If that's your choice, well, so be it. --[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 15:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

281422 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-06 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.183745760E09 +++$+++ (dk undents for a change) I don't quite follow what you meant in \"the relevent article\" and \"local tradition\". As for the ''precise articles''.....hoo boy, this is going to be difficult...  +++$+++ (dk undents for a change) I don't quite follow what you meant in "the relevent article" and "local tradition". As for the ''precise articles''.....hoo boy, this is going to be difficult... [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 11:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
281423 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281422 +++$+++ 281422 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.183746240E09 +++$+++ Hm, [[User:Plastictv]] was the one who wrote that the battlefield is northwest of Puqi, but he's so quiet lately.... +++$+++ :Hm, [[User:Plastictv]] was the one who wrote that the battlefield is northwest of Puqi, but he's so quiet lately....[[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 11:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
281424 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281422 +++$+++ 281422 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.183746660E09 +++$+++ Yeah, but \"Wang Li said\" does not cut it. I could just as easily write say \"Abraham Lincoln said Red Cliffs was in Jiayu.\" I can't accept it unless we have the actual article or book\/page... I ask [[User:Nlu|Nlu]] too many questions; I'm embarrassed to ask if he has stuff by the people cited in the article. But he might.... does anyone else you know have tons of stuff? I looked up Wang Li in my uni for starts and found zilch.  +++$+++ :Yeah, but "Wang Li said" does not cut it. I could just as easily write say "Abraham Lincoln said Red Cliffs was in Jiayu." I can't accept it unless we have the actual article or book/page... I ask [[User:Nlu|Nlu]] too many questions; I'm embarrassed to ask if he has stuff by the people cited in the article. But he might.... does anyone else you know have tons of stuff? I looked up Wang Li in my uni for starts and found zilch. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 11:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
281425 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281422 +++$+++ 281424 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.183747260E09 +++$+++ Sorry. Maybe you can ask around the WikiProject China? Also, I've found the official Chibi city website, which proves to be a potential source for the name change in 1998 [http:\/\/www.chibi.com.cn\/col2080\/col6057\/]. The website also gives information about Chibi's recent developments, so that's good...but I wouldn't rely on this site for actual history\/historical geography.  +++$+++ ::Sorry. Maybe you can ask around the WikiProject China? Also, I've found the official Chibi city website, which proves to be a potential source for the name change in 1998 [http://www.chibi.com.cn/col2080/col6057/]. The website also gives information about Chibi's recent developments, so that's good...but I wouldn't rely on this site for actual history/historical geography. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 11:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
281426 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281422 +++$+++ 281424 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.183766160E09 +++$+++ Can we find some of the sources of the info by copy\/pasting direct quotes into Google Scholar, like '''[http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar?q=%22%E5%8F%A4%E6%88%B0%E5%A0%B4%E8%92%B2%E5%9C%BB%E8%B5%A4%E5%A3%81%E8%AB%96%E6%96%87%E9%9B%86%22&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search this]''' or '''[http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar?num=100&hl=en&lr=&q=%22%E8%B5%A4%E5%A3%81%E5%B1%B1%E5%9C%A8%E8%92%B2%E5%9C%BB%E7%B8%A3%E8%A5%BF%E4%B8%80%E7%99%BE%E4%BA%8C%E5%8D%81%E9%87%8C%22&btnG=Search this]'''?  +++$+++ ::Can we find some of the sources of the info by copy/pasting direct quotes into Google Scholar, like '''[http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22%E5%8F%A4%E6%88%B0%E5%A0%B4%E8%92%B2%E5%9C%BB%E8%B5%A4%E5%A3%81%E8%AB%96%E6%96%87%E9%9B%86%22&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search this]''' or '''[http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=100&hl=en&lr=&q=%22%E8%B5%A4%E5%A3%81%E5%B1%B1%E5%9C%A8%E8%92%B2%E5%9C%BB%E7%B8%A3%E8%A5%BF%E4%B8%80%E7%99%BE%E4%BA%8C%E5%8D%81%E9%87%8C%22&btnG=Search this]'''? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 16:56, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
281427 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281422 +++$+++ 281426 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 08:55:00 +++$+++ 1.183823700E09 +++$+++ I doubt it, that would only work if the quotes are copied verbatim...  +++$+++ :::I doubt it, that would only work if the quotes are copied verbatim... [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 08:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
281428 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281422 +++$+++ 281422 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.183858380E09 +++$+++ Moved it into the main article, hurray!!! :-) But it still needs polishing\/work... the first paragraph is missing a sentence or two forex..  +++$+++ * Moved it into the main article, hurray!!! :-) But it still needs polishing/work... the first paragraph is missing a sentence or two forex.. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 18:33, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
281429 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281422 +++$+++ 281428 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.183871880E09 +++$+++ Great work :) For the most widely accepted battle site, Puqi's paragraph is comparatively short....  +++$+++ ::Great work :) For the most widely accepted battle site, Puqi's paragraph is comparatively short.... [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

543567 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543567 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-31 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.157087460E09 +++$+++ Tim, thanks so much for the review, the excellent copy edit, and the image (which was needed).  I made a few very minor adjustments, which you can see in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tourette_syndrome&diff=73108350&oldid=73093767 this diff.]  I just can't live with the POV language \"sufferer\":  you must be British :-)  And, the adjustment of initially to initial is a subtle difference:  most *initial* or first tics present in mid-line body regions, which is subtly different than Initially, tics present in ... Initially, tics may present anywhere.  It's a small adjustment.  The probabilistic statement was taken almost directly from Swerdlow's article, and makes perfect sense to me, but I'm a mathmetician:  I'll leave it out, since it's not that necessary anyway. Thanks again!   +++$+++ Tim, thanks so much for the review, the excellent copy edit, and the image (which was needed).  I made a few very minor adjustments, which you can see in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tourette_syndrome&diff=73108350&oldid=73093767 this diff.]  I just can't live with the POV language "sufferer":  you must be British :-)  And, the adjustment of initially to initial is a subtle difference:  most *initial* or first tics present in mid-line body regions, which is subtly different than Initially, tics present in ... Initially, tics may present anywhere.  It's a small adjustment.  The probabilistic statement was taken almost directly from Swerdlow's article, and makes perfect sense to me, but I'm a mathmetician:  I'll leave it out, since it's not that necessary anyway. Thanks again!  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] 22:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
543568 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543567 +++$+++ 543567 +++$+++ 2006-08-31 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.157088180E09 +++$+++ Thanks, yes that's better.   +++$+++ :Thanks, yes that's better.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] 22:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

46904 +++$+++ The Founders Intent +++$+++ Born2flie +++$+++ 46904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-23 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.290569400E09 +++$+++ I really hate the lead photo in the article, do have something better. Actually it's the landing gear that gets me. ;) -- +++$+++ I really hate the lead photo in the article, do have something better. Actually it's the landing gear that gets me. ;) --[[User:The Founders Intent|<font color="green">'''''T<small>HE</small> F<small>OUNDERS</small> I<small>NTENT </small>'''''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:The Founders Intent|''PRAISE'']]</sup>  19:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
46905 +++$+++ Born2flie +++$+++ Born2flie +++$+++ 46904 +++$+++ 46904 +++$+++ 2010-11-25 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.290733320E09 +++$+++ MPLH gear is still languishing around. As long as commands believe that there is a real-world requirement to deploy anywhere in the world in 24 hours, there will continue to be utilization of the MPLH rapid deployment landing gear. If you have a high quality photo of the OH-58D in flight, that also shows the MMS and weapon stores, then I think we should discuss changing it on the talk page. That way, there is a record of the deliberate changing, and not indiscriminate changing of the photo like happens on the Bell 206 article. -- +++$+++ :MPLH gear is still languishing around. As long as commands believe that there is a real-world requirement to deploy anywhere in the world in 24 hours, there will continue to be utilization of the MPLH rapid deployment landing gear. If you have a high quality photo of the OH-58D in flight, that also shows the MMS and weapon stores, then I think we should discuss changing it on the talk page. That way, there is a record of the deliberate changing, and not indiscriminate changing of the photo like happens on the Bell 206 article. --[[User:Born2flie|Born2flie]] ([[User talk:Born2flie#top|talk]]) 17:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

543572 +++$+++ NCurse +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543572 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-02 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.157233860E09 +++$+++ You've made a great job! I expressed my opinion there, for now I have a weak object, but very weak. :) Just go on like that and it'll become featured.  +++$+++ You've made a great job! I expressed my opinion there, for now I have a weak object, but very weak. :) Just go on like that and it'll become featured. [[User:NCurse|NCurse]] [[Image:Edu science.png|16px]]<sub> [[User talk:NCurse|work]]</sub> 14:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
543573 +++$+++ NCurse +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543572 +++$+++ 543572 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.157241120E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. I think I have to support it now. Well done. :)  +++$+++ :You're welcome. I think I have to support it now. Well done. :) [[User:NCurse|NCurse]] [[Image:Edu science.png|16px]]<sub> [[User talk:NCurse|work]]</sub> 16:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

281430 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-08 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.183885680E09 +++$+++ (undent) Yeah, the whole thing needs finishing work, but at least it's enough to put on the article. I'm making a map of some historic changes of the Yangtze river... which would affect the idea of the location... I'll look at the forum you mentioned tomorrow... Later!  +++$+++ (undent) Yeah, the whole thing needs finishing work, but at least it's enough to put on the article. I'm making a map of some historic changes of the Yangtze river... which would affect the idea of the location... I'll look at the forum you mentioned tomorrow... Later! [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 02:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
281431 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281430 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.183933020E09 +++$+++ '''PS''' Wow the Sawyer books look fascinating. You're gonna turn me into a Chinese Military History buff! :-) BTW, after reading Zhang (2006) and because of a vague and probably incorrect intuition about military matters (based partially on an extremely-beginner's-level knowledge of [[Go (board game)|\u570d\u68cb]] I don't think Chibi was at the Puqi site; I think it was downstream, either in Jiayu or Wuhan. I think \"vanguard forces\" would have been sent downstream toward Cao Cao's adversaries. Here I'm assuming that Wulin was Cao Cao's main base of operations. :-)  +++$+++ ::'''PS''' Wow the Sawyer books look fascinating. You're gonna turn me into a Chinese Military History buff! :-) BTW, after reading Zhang (2006) and because of a vague and probably incorrect intuition about military matters (based partially on an extremely-beginner's-level knowledge of [[Go (board game)|圍棋]] I don't think Chibi was at the Puqi site; I think it was downstream, either in Jiayu or Wuhan. I think "vanguard forces" would have been sent downstream toward Cao Cao's adversaries. Here I'm assuming that Wulin was Cao Cao's main base of operations. :-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 15:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
281432 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281430 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.183933860E09 +++$+++ '''PPS''' hey do you feel like writing messages on the Chinese wikipedia asking for help with the sources of the \"Location\" info? It was originally posted by '''[http:\/\/zh.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Stargate756 Stargate756]''', but I doubt that anyone with \"Stargate\" in their username got the info from anywhere other than some Internet site. But maybe other editors there might be able to help.  +++$+++ ::'''PPS''' hey do you feel like writing messages on the Chinese wikipedia asking for help with the sources of the "Location" info? It was originally posted by '''[http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stargate756 Stargate756]''', but I doubt that anyone with "Stargate" in their username got the info from anywhere other than some Internet site. But maybe other editors there might be able to help. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 15:31, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
281433 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281430 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.183958460E09 +++$+++ Well, would you think anyone with \"deadkid\" in their username to get their information from anywhere other than some Internet site? XD Anyways, I left a message on the Chinese [[:zh:Talk:\u8d64\u58c1\u4e4b\u6230|Battle of Chibi talk page]].  +++$+++ :::Well, would you think anyone with "deadkid" in their username to get their information from anywhere other than some Internet site? XD Anyways, I left a message on the Chinese [[:zh:Talk:赤壁之戰|Battle of Chibi talk page]]. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

543575 +++$+++ Username132 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-04 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.157409840E09 +++$+++ According to that sentence, I can infer if I want to (and I do) that if I take 2 kg of orotate decarboxylase substrate and keep it somewhere safe, 1 kg will still be knocking around in 78 million years but if I apply a couple of enzyme molecules, 1 kg disappears in 25 milliseconds. This is wrong, therefore the two sentences above are wrong... but why? -- +++$+++ According to that sentence, I can infer if I want to (and I do) that if I take 2 kg of orotate decarboxylase substrate and keep it somewhere safe, 1 kg will still be knocking around in 78 million years but if I apply a couple of enzyme molecules, 1 kg disappears in 25 milliseconds. This is wrong, therefore the two sentences above are wrong... but why? --[[User:Username132|Username132]] ([[User talk:Username132|talk]]) 15:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
543576 +++$+++ Username132 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543575 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.157410260E09 +++$+++ My issue isn't with what happens to the subsrate (dissapears, turns into midgets, whatever) - it's that \"enzyme\" (e.g. one molecule, a billion molecules) removes half in 25 microseconds. This does not make sense. It surely depends on how much enzyme is present? -- +++$+++ :::My issue isn't with what happens to the subsrate (dissapears, turns into midgets, whatever) - it's that "enzyme" (e.g. one molecule, a billion molecules) removes half in 25 microseconds. This does not make sense. It surely depends on how much enzyme is present? --[[User:Username132|Username132]] ([[User talk:Username132|talk]]) 15:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
543577 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543575 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-05 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.157508240E09 +++$+++ The comparison is between two rates and will refer to k(cat) versus k(spontaneous). You are quite correct that the actual rate of the overall reaction (at saturating substrate) v = kcat[E][S] so both E and S are needed as variables if you are going to be comparing amounts consumed instead of rates. However, kcat is a constant and not affected by the amount of enzyme or substrate present (as long as S is saturating).  +++$+++ ::::The comparison is between two rates and will refer to k(cat) versus k(spontaneous). You are quite correct that the actual rate of the overall reaction (at saturating substrate) v = kcat[E][S] so both E and S are needed as variables if you are going to be comparing amounts consumed instead of rates. However, kcat is a constant and not affected by the amount of enzyme or substrate present (as long as S is saturating). [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 19:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

281434 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-09 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.184013720E09 +++$+++ (undent) I thought the \"deadkid\" stuff was from [[Kindertotenlieder]].  +++$+++ (undent) I thought the "deadkid" stuff was from [[Kindertotenlieder]]. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 13:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
281435 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281434 +++$+++ 281434 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.184023260E09 +++$+++ Ahahahaha! I never knew that myself!  +++$+++ :Ahahahaha! I never knew that myself! [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 16:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
281436 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281434 +++$+++ 281435 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.184025000E09 +++$+++ Sure, it's an excellent tune for picking up chicks... well... suicidal [[Goth subculture|goth]] chicks, anyhow...  +++$+++ ::Sure, it's an excellent tune for picking up chicks... well... suicidal [[Goth subculture|goth]] chicks, anyhow... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 16:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
281437 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281434 +++$+++ 281436 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.184025600E09 +++$+++ I'll have a listen someday...but I'm not really interested in picking up goth chicks, unless you mean [[Gothic lolita|their eastern variant]] :)  +++$+++ :::I'll have a listen someday...but I'm not really interested in picking up goth chicks, unless you mean [[Gothic lolita|their eastern variant]] :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 17:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

19291 +++$+++ Night w +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 13:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311192000E09 +++$+++ Hello! I've lodged a request for your actions on [[Talk:China]] to be reviewed. Please see [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts#SchmuckyTheCat|Wikiquette alerts]]. Thanks, and best regards, '''<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ Hello! I've lodged a request for your actions on [[Talk:China]] to be reviewed. Please see [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts#SchmuckyTheCat|Wikiquette alerts]]. Thanks, and best regards, '''<span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Night w|<font color="black">Night</font><font color="gray">w</font>]]</span>''' 13:00, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
19292 +++$+++ Night w +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19291 +++$+++ 19291 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.311344280E09 +++$+++ Please instead see [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents#SchmuckyTheCat]]. '''<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ :Please instead see [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#SchmuckyTheCat]]. '''<span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Night w|<font color="black">Night</font><font color="gray">w</font>]]</span>''' 07:18, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

19293 +++$+++ Eraserhead1 +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-22 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.311342120E09 +++$+++ I've been bold and removed your RfC, can you get the move discussion closed first please? Possibly make a request on ANI for it to be closed? --  +++$+++ I've been bold and removed your RfC, can you get the move discussion closed first please? Possibly make a request on ANI for it to be closed? -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 06:42, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
19294 +++$+++ Night w +++$+++ SchmuckyTheCat +++$+++ 19293 +++$+++ 19293 +++$+++ 2011-07-22 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.311344160E09 +++$+++ Why would one go to ANI for closing RfC's? Do you mean AN? '''<span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ :Why would one go to ANI for closing RfC's? Do you mean AN? '''<span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Night w|<font color="black">Night</font><font color="gray">w</font>]]</span>''' 07:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

281438 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281438 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-09 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.184033760E09 +++$+++ (undent) Yeah, been there done that on the goth chicks, back in my [[antediluvian]] single days. They're always like, \"Let's get stoned and talk about how much we hate our parents.\" Gets a bit dull, kinda quick actually.  +++$+++ (undent) Yeah, been there done that on the goth chicks, back in my [[antediluvian]] single days. They're always like, "Let's get stoned and talk about how much we hate our parents." Gets a bit dull, kinda quick actually. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 19:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
281439 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281438 +++$+++ 281438 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.184046180E09 +++$+++ And the worst lot would threaten to kill themselves, I don't ever want to deal with them.  +++$+++ :And the worst lot would threaten to kill themselves, I don't ever want to deal with them. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
281440 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281438 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.184048160E09 +++$+++ I gotta study. The location section needs work, but I dunno when I can get to it. It may be a while.. cross your fingers for me! Later!  +++$+++ ::* I gotta study. The location section needs work, but I dunno when I can get to it. It may be a while.. cross your fingers for me! Later! [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 23:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

281441 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-12 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.184268060E09 +++$+++ Can you find the bit where Cao Cao trained his men on lakes before the Battle of Red Cliffs? I think your link to the Sawyer discussion mentioned it, and I think I remember seeing that training period mentioned back when I had books from the library... but I suspect it may have been in \"Romance\" instead of anything reliable... I don't have those books now... if the troops trained for months, this time period also makes [[schistosomiasis]] a possibility, as the Chinese wikipedia says (and has a good reference for :-) )  +++$+++ Can you find the bit where Cao Cao trained his men on lakes before the Battle of Red Cliffs? I think your link to the Sawyer discussion mentioned it, and I think I remember seeing that training period mentioned back when I had books from the library... but I suspect it may have been in "Romance" instead of anything reliable... I don't have those books now... if the troops trained for months, this time period also makes [[schistosomiasis]] a possibility, as the Chinese wikipedia says (and has a good reference for :-) ) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 12:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
281442 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281441 +++$+++ 281441 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.184307900E09 +++$+++ It's not in either Sanguo Zhi or Zizhi Tongjian, it could have been in the (still reliable) unofficial histories, but I'm not aware of them.  +++$+++ :It's not in either Sanguo Zhi or Zizhi Tongjian, it could have been in the (still reliable) unofficial histories, but I'm not aware of them. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
281443 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281441 +++$+++ 281442 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.184312160E09 +++$+++ Cr*p. The \"artificial lake\" bit was quite interesting. But it does sound... suspicious. Thanks! BTW, I uploaded the mengchong doujian (\u8499\u51b2\u6597\u8230) image under a PD-China License.  +++$+++ ::Cr*p. The "artificial lake" bit was quite interesting. But it does sound... suspicious. Thanks! BTW, I uploaded the mengchong doujian (蒙冲斗舰) image under a PD-China License. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 00:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

19299 +++$+++ Flowerparty +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19299 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-14 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.145006340E09 +++$+++ I've thought about it, it just seems as if we're getting bogged down trying to think about every possible permutation of artist\/type\/chronology, etc. Do you think it might be easier to make 'artist' and 'chronology_artist' two independently declarable parameters? And maybe we could provide a means to let users type in for themselves \"Soundtrack to the film ''Wonderwall'' by George Harrison\", or whatever?  +++$+++ I've thought about it, it just seems as if we're getting bogged down trying to think about every possible permutation of artist/type/chronology, etc. Do you think it might be easier to make 'artist' and 'chronology_artist' two independently declarable parameters? And maybe we could provide a means to let users type in for themselves "Soundtrack to the film ''Wonderwall'' by George Harrison", or whatever? [[User:Flowerparty|Flower]][[User talk:Flowerparty|party<font color="e7ef96">?</font>]] 02:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
19300 +++$+++ Flowerparty +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19299 +++$+++ 19299 +++$+++ 2006-04-14 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.145009820E09 +++$+++ Oops, didn't mean to post this in two places :)  +++$+++ :Oops, didn't mean to post this in two places :) [[User:Flowerparty|Flower]][[User talk:Flowerparty|party<font color="e7ef96">?</font>]] 03:17, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
19301 +++$+++ Kingboyk +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19299 +++$+++ 19300 +++$+++ 2006-04-17 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.145284560E09 +++$+++ I dunno where you took this thread to, but since I'm here I'd like to support that idea. ''[[Space (album)|Space]]'' for example is by Jimmy Cauty aka Space, but it's unlikely that if he releases any more albums they would use that moniker. It would in that instance be preferable to be able to assign the value \"Jimmy Cauty\" to 'chronology_artist' whilst retaining \"Space\" as the artist. (Sorry I can't at this ungodly hour think of a better example - i.e. someone who actually ''has'' more than 1 album!- but I'm pretty sure there are examples out there :)). -- +++$+++ ::I dunno where you took this thread to, but since I'm here I'd like to support that idea. ''[[Space (album)|Space]]'' for example is by Jimmy Cauty aka Space, but it's unlikely that if he releases any more albums they would use that moniker. It would in that instance be preferable to be able to assign the value "Jimmy Cauty" to 'chronology_artist' whilst retaining "Space" as the artist. (Sorry I can't at this ungodly hour think of a better example - i.e. someone who actually ''has'' more than 1 album!- but I'm pretty sure there are examples out there :)). --[[User:Kingboyk|kingboyk]] 07:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
19302 +++$+++ Flowerparty +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19299 +++$+++ 19301 +++$+++ 2006-04-17 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.145299680E09 +++$+++ [[Template talk:Album infobox]] -  something of a backwater, alas. It's the same deal with Frank Zappa LPs, some of which are credited as being with the Mothers of Invention, but all of which should have a \"Frank Zappa chronology\".  +++$+++ :::[[Template talk:Album infobox]] -  something of a backwater, alas. It's the same deal with Frank Zappa LPs, some of which are credited as being with the Mothers of Invention, but all of which should have a "Frank Zappa chronology". [[User:Flowerparty|Flower]][[User talk:Flowerparty|party<font color="e7ef11">☀</font>]] 11:48, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
19303 +++$+++ Jogers +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19299 +++$+++ 19302 +++$+++ 2006-04-17 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.145301780E09 +++$+++ What about moving this discussion to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums]]?  +++$+++ ::::What about moving this discussion to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums]]? [[User:Jogers|Jogers]] ([[User_talk:Jogers|talk]]) 12:23, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

281444 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-13 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.184315220E09 +++$+++ general description for vessels of war\" but later giving more details... \"ships covered with raw ox-hide\"; \"breaking the enemy line\" etc.  +++$+++ general description for vessels of war" but later giving more details... "ships covered with raw ox-hide"; "breaking the enemy line" etc. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 01:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
281445 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281444 +++$+++ 281444 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.184315460E09 +++$+++ Read carefully, he's only describing the ''mengchong'' there.  +++$+++ :Read carefully, he's only describing the ''mengchong'' there. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 01:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
281446 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281444 +++$+++ 281445 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.184315700E09 +++$+++ Thus a \"mengchong doujian\" is a ship that has the functions\/attributes of both a mengchong and a doujian.  +++$+++ :: Thus a "mengchong doujian" is a ship that has the functions/attributes of both a mengchong and a doujian. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 01:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
281447 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281444 +++$+++ 281446 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.184316360E09 +++$+++ That last phrase is quite open to interpretation, I see it as saying a capital ship can be either a mengchong or a doujian (and not both). And the reason I swiped that sentence out completely is that it is misleading to say the fire ships were mengchong doujian when every ship that participated in the battle are mengchong and doujian.  +++$+++ :::That last phrase is quite open to interpretation, I see it as saying a capital ship can be either a mengchong or a doujian (and not both). And the reason I swiped that sentence out completely is that it is misleading to say the fire ships were mengchong doujian when every ship that participated in the battle are mengchong and doujian. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 01:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
281448 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281444 +++$+++ 281445 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.184316540E09 +++$+++ Zhang (2006) says: \"leather-covered assault warships (mengchong doujian \u8499\u51b2\u6597\u8230)\" Moreover, de Crespigny specifically says they are mengchong doujian; he just discusses the meaning of the term...  +++$+++ ::Zhang (2006) says: "leather-covered assault warships (mengchong doujian 蒙冲斗舰)" Moreover, de Crespigny specifically says they are mengchong doujian; he just discusses the meaning of the term... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 01:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
281449 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281444 +++$+++ 281448 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.184317440E09 +++$+++ I guess the argument here is whether mengchong doujian is one type of ship, or two. My view is that the fleet is composed of mengchong and doujian, thus ''mengchong doujian''. Zhang only provided a literal translation and combined the two meanings together.  +++$+++ :::I guess the argument here is whether mengchong doujian is one type of ship, or two. My view is that the fleet is composed of mengchong and doujian, thus ''mengchong doujian''. Zhang only provided a literal translation and combined the two meanings together. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 02:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

543589 +++$+++ DavidShankBone +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-16 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.158450360E09 +++$+++ Tim, thanks for the compliments on the article.  I knew it needed some changes, but I had stared at it for too long that I could no longer see them.  I spent about 15 hours on it one weekend and have been tooling with it since, and I think all of your suggestions were excellent.  You really do tremendous work on here.  I'll let you know when I make the revisions.  -- +++$+++ Tim, thanks for the compliments on the article.  I knew it needed some changes, but I had stared at it for too long that I could no longer see them.  I spent about 15 hours on it one weekend and have been tooling with it since, and I think all of your suggestions were excellent.  You really do tremendous work on here.  I'll let you know when I make the revisions.  --[[User:DavidShankBone|DavidShankBone]] 16:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
543590 +++$+++ DavidShankBone +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543589 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-16 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.158450480E09 +++$+++ '''I also plan to get in touch with the reporters from that night to see if they will give me a few photographs'''; wouldn't that be awesome?  They still live and write here in NYC.  -- +++$+++ ::'''I also plan to get in touch with the reporters from that night to see if they will give me a few photographs'''; wouldn't that be awesome?  They still live and write here in NYC.  --[[User:DavidShankBone|DavidShankBone]] 16:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

543591 +++$+++ ClockworkSoul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543591 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-17 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.158552900E09 +++$+++ It would be my pleasure! It would only be fair to let you know, however, that I've been pulling teh brutal hours of a graduate student lately, and I may have some periods of inactivity. &ndash;  +++$+++ It would be my pleasure! It would only be fair to let you know, however, that I've been pulling teh brutal hours of a graduate student lately, and I may have some periods of inactivity. &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 21:15, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
543592 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543591 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-17 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.158553020E09 +++$+++ Any feedback is welcome. I'm trying to assemble a group of expert editors for this, since it is a bit of a specialised subject.  +++$+++ ::Any feedback is welcome. I'm trying to assemble a group of expert editors for this, since it is a bit of a specialised subject. [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 21:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

543593 +++$+++ NCurse +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-18 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.158582480E09 +++$+++ I've made my suggestions, but it's nearly a perfect article. I  often find faults, unreferenced statements, but in this case, I could write just a few words. :) Well done!  +++$+++ I've made my suggestions, but it's nearly a perfect article. I  often find faults, unreferenced statements, but in this case, I could write just a few words. :) Well done! [[User:NCurse|NCurse]] <sub> [[User talk:NCurse|work]]</sub> 05:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
543594 +++$+++ Xcomradex +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543593 +++$+++ 543593 +++$+++ 2006-09-19 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.158689100E09 +++$+++ thanks for the invitation, happy to help. it looks in good shape, one technical niggle of mine would be whether slow-tight reversible inhibition is best placed under reversible inhibition\/special cases or irreversible inhibition\/slow-tight. it is currently in the latter; i added it to reversible inhibition without realising this. my gut instinct would be it belongs in reversible inhibition, but it does in practice share some aspects with ireversible inhibition, so if some biochemist is trawling the wikipedia looking for an explanation of their bizarre kinetics, they would be most likely to find it there. any one have comments?  +++$+++ :thanks for the invitation, happy to help. it looks in good shape, one technical niggle of mine would be whether slow-tight reversible inhibition is best placed under reversible inhibition/special cases or irreversible inhibition/slow-tight. it is currently in the latter; i added it to reversible inhibition without realising this. my gut instinct would be it belongs in reversible inhibition, but it does in practice share some aspects with ireversible inhibition, so if some biochemist is trawling the wikipedia looking for an explanation of their bizarre kinetics, they would be most likely to find it there. any one have comments? [[User:Xcomradex|Xcomradex]] 11:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

281450 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-13 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.184317800E09 +++$+++ (undent) Your Chinese is much better than mine. Is it possible in Chinese to omit a conjunction such as \u548c or \u8ddf and let a string of two successive nouns refer to a set of two objects?  +++$+++ (undent) Your Chinese is much better than mine. Is it possible in Chinese to omit a conjunction such as 和 or 跟 and let a string of two successive nouns refer to a set of two objects? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 02:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
281451 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281450 +++$+++ 281450 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.184318040E09 +++$+++ Yes, especially in [[Classical Chinese]].  +++$+++ :Yes, especially in [[Classical Chinese]]. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 02:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
281452 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281450 +++$+++ 281451 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.184324460E09 +++$+++ Mmmm. I hate to be a pain in the neck, but even still, Wikipedia is about Verifiability, not Truth. We can report what Zhang and de Crespigny said, making sure to cite them. If you wanna add your own view, perhaps in a footnote, you could... but it would be bordering on [[WP:OR]].  +++$+++ ::Mmmm. I hate to be a pain in the neck, but even still, Wikipedia is about Verifiability, not Truth. We can report what Zhang and de Crespigny said, making sure to cite them. If you wanna add your own view, perhaps in a footnote, you could... but it would be bordering on [[WP:OR]]. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 04:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
281453 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281450 +++$+++ 281452 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.184330880E09 +++$+++ I'm not saying de Crespigny is wrong, I just have a different interpretation of de Crespigny's text (those which you quoted above) than yours. Since he goes into great depths explaining the difference between the mengchong and the doujian, while saying the phrase is \"a general description for vessels of war\" (like how the word \"fruit\" is a general description for \"apples and oranges\"), I believe he's saying that this phrase: \"In that sense, the phrase mengchong doujian would then describe both the specialised functions of the capital ships at that time\" - does not refer to one type of ship only.  +++$+++ :::I'm not saying de Crespigny is wrong, I just have a different interpretation of de Crespigny's text (those which you quoted above) than yours. Since he goes into great depths explaining the difference between the mengchong and the doujian, while saying the phrase is "a general description for vessels of war" (like how the word "fruit" is a general description for "apples and oranges"), I believe he's saying that this phrase: "In that sense, the phrase mengchong doujian would then describe both the specialised functions of the capital ships at that time" - does not refer to one type of ship only. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 05:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

19307 +++$+++ Ericorbit +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19307 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-21 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.145620080E09 +++$+++ GAH!  Don't tell me there's a different single infobox template!  *sigh*  Ah well, I know better - I should have checked before I started all of this.  Well, the info is all there, if you're ''really'' feeling motivated, feel free to update the infoboxes and add any edits.  I'm really just writing very basic stuff so far.  Good luck with the older singles search!  --  +++$+++ GAH!  Don't tell me there's a different single infobox template!  *sigh*  Ah well, I know better - I should have checked before I started all of this.  Well, the info is all there, if you're ''really'' feeling motivated, feel free to update the infoboxes and add any edits.  I'm really just writing very basic stuff so far.  Good luck with the older singles search!  -- [[User:Ericorbit|eo]] 04:48, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
19308 +++$+++ Ericorbit +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19307 +++$+++ 19307 +++$+++ 2006-04-21 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.145621160E09 +++$+++ I'm trying to remember where I got that infobox template... I guess I just swiped it from an article I came across earlier today.  And yes, the U.S. tracklistings need to be added... I have a mixture of US\/UK singles in my personal collection so once I get all the song articles created I'll go back and tweak stuff.  Most of the time the US versions just mash together the same stuff that the UK record companies spread out over multiple discs.  --  +++$+++ :I'm trying to remember where I got that infobox template... I guess I just swiped it from an article I came across earlier today.  And yes, the U.S. tracklistings need to be added... I have a mixture of US/UK singles in my personal collection so once I get all the song articles created I'll go back and tweak stuff.  Most of the time the US versions just mash together the same stuff that the UK record companies spread out over multiple discs.  -- [[User:Ericorbit|eo]] 05:06, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

281454 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-13 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.184356860E09 +++$+++ (undent) Why don't we ask him, then? :-) But actually, unless he gives us some references to printed stuff, even ''his'' opinion is [[WP:OR]]... mmm, I don't mean that his opinion about the meaning of his own text would be OR; that would be clarification. But if he expands on the idea and presents unpublished info such as thoughts &amp; opinions, then it's OR  +++$+++ (undent) Why don't we ask him, then? :-) But actually, unless he gives us some references to printed stuff, even ''his'' opinion is [[WP:OR]]... mmm, I don't mean that his opinion about the meaning of his own text would be OR; that would be clarification. But if he expands on the idea and presents unpublished info such as thoughts &amp; opinions, then it's OR [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 13:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
281455 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281454 +++$+++ 281454 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.184392680E09 +++$+++ We can ask first, then worry about OR later :)  +++$+++ :We can ask first, then worry about OR later :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
281456 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281454 +++$+++ 281455 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.184393220E09 +++$+++ While we're at it, I wanna ask about [[Chibi City]], and whether that's the same as a vague reference to \"Near Jaiyu.\" :-)  +++$+++ ::While we're at it, I wanna ask about [[Chibi City]], and whether that's the same as a vague reference to "Near Jaiyu." :-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 23:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
281457 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281454 +++$+++ 281456 +++$+++ 2007-07-13 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.184393340E09 +++$+++ Ask away~  +++$+++ :::Ask away~ [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 23:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

19311 +++$+++ Ericorbit +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19311 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-25 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.146033060E09 +++$+++ FYI: Not sure if you have a copy... or whether it is even valid to use as a source... but the ''Alternative'' B-side compilation has a Q&A interview with Tennant and Lowe that gives a lot of insight and background info on all the singles and their B-sides. --  +++$+++ FYI: Not sure if you have a copy... or whether it is even valid to use as a source... but the ''Alternative'' B-side compilation has a Q&A interview with Tennant and Lowe that gives a lot of insight and background info on all the singles and their B-sides. -- [[User:Ericorbit|eo]] 23:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
19312 +++$+++ Ericorbit +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19311 +++$+++ 19311 +++$+++ 2006-04-27 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.146168600E09 +++$+++ PSB seem to fall into that singles-completist category with artists like Depeche Mode, Erasure, Bjork, New Order, Smiths, etc., etc.  What do you think? --  +++$+++ :PSB seem to fall into that singles-completist category with artists like Depeche Mode, Erasure, Bjork, New Order, Smiths, etc., etc.  What do you think? -- [[User:Ericorbit|eo]] 13:10, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

19314 +++$+++ Jogers +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-27 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.146160320E09 +++$+++ I fixed the problem on [[User:Jogers\/Template:Album infobox|my talk page]] by making the artist parameter optional. Thanks for pointing this out.  +++$+++ I fixed the problem on [[User:Jogers/Template:Album infobox|my talk page]] by making the artist parameter optional. Thanks for pointing this out. [[User:Jogers|Jogers]] ([[User_talk:Jogers|talk]]) 10:52, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
19315 +++$+++ Jogers +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19314 +++$+++ 19314 +++$+++ 2006-04-28 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.146267540E09 +++$+++ We could still use [[:Category:Various artists albums]] without the template but personally I don't find it very useful.  +++$+++ :We could still use [[:Category:Various artists albums]] without the template but personally I don't find it very useful. [[User:Jogers|Jogers]] ([[User_talk:Jogers|talk]]) 16:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

281459 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-14 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.184434200E09 +++$+++ Also see [http:\/\/www.anu.edu.au\/asianstudies\/decrespigny\/peace2_part3.pdf To Establish Peace, Volume 2, part 3, footnote 78 of 208 AD]. \"The combined phrase ''mengchong doujian'' may be interpreted as a general description of ships of war.\"  +++$+++ Also see [http://www.anu.edu.au/asianstudies/decrespigny/peace2_part3.pdf To Establish Peace, Volume 2, part 3, footnote 78 of 208 AD]. "The combined phrase ''mengchong doujian'' may be interpreted as a general description of ships of war." [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 10:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
281460 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281459 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-14 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.184447640E09 +++$+++ Maybe we should copy\/paste all this to the talk of the article...  +++$+++ :* Maybe we should copy/paste all this to the talk of the article... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 14:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
281461 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281459 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-14 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.184448600E09 +++$+++ '''OK I copy\/pasted the whole spiel to the Talk of the article. Maybe we should continue there, in case someone else comes along who's smarter than both of us put together ;-)'''  +++$+++ ::*'''OK I copy/pasted the whole spiel to the Talk of the article. Maybe we should continue there, in case someone else comes along who's smarter than both of us put together ;-)''' [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 14:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

177982 +++$+++ Raintheone +++$+++ AcidBrights +++$+++ 177982 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-11 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.294808040E09 +++$+++ With Joey I found that my first and last dates did not match mine. Where did you find them? Why is Dexter listed as appearing months before Indigo. Where did you find Dexter and Indigo's first app dates from? I need to know quick btw. +++$+++ With Joey I found that my first and last dates did not match mine. Where did you find them? Why is Dexter listed as appearing months before Indigo. Where did you find Dexter and Indigo's first app dates from? I need to know quick btw.[[User:Raintheone|'''<span style="color:blue;font-family:Modern">RAIN..the..ONE</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Raintheone|<font color="#AA22CC">'''HOTLINE'''</font>]]</sup> 20:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
177983 +++$+++ Raintheone +++$+++ AcidBrights +++$+++ 177982 +++$+++ 177982 +++$+++ 2011-01-11 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.294809600E09 +++$+++ Wouldn't trust anything on their then. I typed in the episode numbers from backtothebay, Digital Spy and other spoiler guide bring different first and last dates up. Anyone can edit IMDB so they must have got it wrong, so I can't use Dexters date, cant find his first app either. =\/  +++$+++ :Wouldn't trust anything on their then. I typed in the episode numbers from backtothebay, Digital Spy and other spoiler guide bring different first and last dates up. Anyone can edit IMDB so they must have got it wrong, so I can't use Dexters date, cant find his first app either. =/ [[User:Raintheone|'''<span style="color:blue;font-family:Modern">RAIN..the..ONE</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Raintheone|<font color="#AA22CC">'''HOTLINE'''</font>]]</sup> 21:20, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

19318 +++$+++  +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ It's generally more practical to split a category that is too large than tostart by ategorizing into small units. 23:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ It's generally more practical to split a category that is too large than tostart by ategorizing into small units. 23:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
19319 +++$+++ Circeus +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19318 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.147387380E09 +++$+++ As I said above, I'd sort em in the broader cat for now and then see whether a split of some sortis appropriate. Templates can be much harder to sort sensibly, as there are so many different types. I ended up removing quite a few infoboxes from the country-based nav. templates.  +++$+++ :*As I said above, I'd sort em in the broader cat for now and then see whether a split of some sortis appropriate. Templates can be much harder to sort sensibly, as there are so many different types. I ended up removing quite a few infoboxes from the country-based nav. templates. [[User:Circeus|Circeus]] 15:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

19320 +++$+++ Jogers +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19320 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-11 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.147372620E09 +++$+++ How do you like an idea of splitting the advanced usage information into a seperate section like [[User:Jogers\/WikiProject_Albums#Advanced_usage|this]]?  +++$+++ How do you like an idea of splitting the advanced usage information into a seperate section like [[User:Jogers/WikiProject_Albums#Advanced_usage|this]]? [[User:Jogers|Jogers]] ([[User_talk:Jogers|talk]]) 11:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
19321 +++$+++ Jogers +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19320 +++$+++ 19320 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.147388460E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure if it really has to be maintained independently at all. Maybe linking to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums|WikiProject Albums]] for usage instructions would be a better solution.  +++$+++ :I'm not sure if it really has to be maintained independently at all. Maybe linking to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums|WikiProject Albums]] for usage instructions would be a better solution. [[User:Jogers|Jogers]] ([[User_talk:Jogers|talk]]) 16:01, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

543609 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543609 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-28 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.159442340E09 +++$+++ I was going for an extended metaphor in this paragraph, do you think this is inappropriate?  +++$+++ I was going for an extended metaphor in this paragraph, do you think this is inappropriate? [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 04:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
543610 +++$+++ Shyamal +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543609 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-28 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.159447320E09 +++$+++ I would think that the introduction to enzymes should be minimal with the main article  indicated and then moving on to the main topic of kinetics in relations to reaction mechanism, energetics etcetera as we have it already.  +++$+++ ::I would think that the introduction to enzymes should be minimal with the main article  indicated and then moving on to the main topic of kinetics in relations to reaction mechanism, energetics etcetera as we have it already. [[User:Shyamal|Shyamal]] 05:42, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

281467 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-16 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.184641620E09 +++$+++ (undent) <small>shhhhhhhhhhh someone might hear you<\/small> North is up. :-)  +++$+++ (undent) <small>shhhhhhhhhhh someone might hear you</small> North is up. :-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 20:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
281468 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281467 +++$+++ 281467 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.184642880E09 +++$+++ There, a crappy compass is now on the image.  +++$+++ :There, a crappy compass is now on the image. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 20:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
281469 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281467 +++$+++ 281468 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.184643180E09 +++$+++ Looks fine. I still need to think about the text of the section, esp. since we have no refs for shtuff coped from the Chinese Wikipedia.  +++$+++ ::Looks fine. I still need to think about the text of the section, esp. since we have no refs for shtuff coped from the Chinese Wikipedia. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 20:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

19324 +++$+++ Ericorbit +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-18 05:16:00 +++$+++ 1.147954560E09 +++$+++ Hi there.  I can't think of a more concrete reason for not including remix desciptions inside the quotation marks other than the title of a remix simply is not part of a song title.  When a songwriter copyrights his\/her composition, s\/he doesn't have to submit a new copyright for each mix of the song, i.e. \"Song X (Remix A)\" and \"Song X (Remix B)\", etc.  The copyright would cover all mixes of \"Song X\" so long as the basic melody and\/or lyrics remain in tact.  At least that's how I see it. --  +++$+++ Hi there.  I can't think of a more concrete reason for not including remix desciptions inside the quotation marks other than the title of a remix simply is not part of a song title.  When a songwriter copyrights his/her composition, s/he doesn't have to submit a new copyright for each mix of the song, i.e. "Song X (Remix A)" and "Song X (Remix B)", etc.  The copyright would cover all mixes of "Song X" so long as the basic melody and/or lyrics remain in tact.  At least that's how I see it. -- [[User:Ericorbit|eo]] 05:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
19325 +++$+++ Ericorbit +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19324 +++$+++ 19324 +++$+++ 2006-05-18 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.147954800E09 +++$+++ Oh, and to add to the argument - a remixer doesn't receive royalties for a song's sales and\/or performances in the same manner as the song's composer.  Remixers usually receive a one-time fee for taking already-copyrighted material and presenting it in a alternate version. --  +++$+++ :Oh, and to add to the argument - a remixer doesn't receive royalties for a song's sales and/or performances in the same manner as the song's composer.  Remixers usually receive a one-time fee for taking already-copyrighted material and presenting it in a alternate version. -- [[User:Ericorbit|eo]] 05:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

543613 +++$+++ NCurse +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543613 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-28 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.159501620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note. I supported it. :) Great work!  +++$+++ Thanks for the note. I supported it. :) Great work! [[User:NCurse|NCurse]] <sub> [[User talk:NCurse|work]]</sub> 20:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
543614 +++$+++ NCurse +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543613 +++$+++ 543613 +++$+++ 2006-10-10 05:47:00 +++$+++ 1.160484420E09 +++$+++ You're welcome! :) Drop me a message if you work with an other great article.  +++$+++ :You're welcome! :) Drop me a message if you work with an other great article. [[User:NCurse|NCurse]] <sub> [[User talk:NCurse|work]]</sub> 05:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

19326 +++$+++ CapitalR +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-21 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.148256720E09 +++$+++ Hi Unint, I know you do a lot of navigation box work, so you might find this list I'm putting together interesting: [[:User:CapitalR\/Uncategorized navigational boxes]].  It's a work in progress, but it aims to find every single navigation box in English Wikipedia so they can be categorized and possibly standardized.  I'm going to spend most of my time over the next few weeks working through the 40,000 templates finding all of the navigation boxes (with the help of a few bots), but feel free to distribute this page to anyone you know who might want to help start sorting, categorizing, and converting some to the NavigationBox form.  -- +++$+++ Hi Unint, I know you do a lot of navigation box work, so you might find this list I'm putting together interesting: [[:User:CapitalR/Uncategorized navigational boxes]].  It's a work in progress, but it aims to find every single navigation box in English Wikipedia so they can be categorized and possibly standardized.  I'm going to spend most of my time over the next few weeks working through the 40,000 templates finding all of the navigation boxes (with the help of a few bots), but feel free to distribute this page to anyone you know who might want to help start sorting, categorizing, and converting some to the NavigationBox form.  --[[User:CapitalR|CapitalR]] 17:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
19327 +++$+++ CapitalR +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19326 +++$+++ 19326 +++$+++ 2006-05-21 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.148256720E09 +++$+++ One other question: when you go through and categorize large numbers of templates, do you do this by hand or with an automated tool?  I use the [[AutoWikiBrowser]] sometimes, but I was wondering if there is another one out there.  Thanks, -- +++$+++ *One other question: when you go through and categorize large numbers of templates, do you do this by hand or with an automated tool?  I use the [[AutoWikiBrowser]] sometimes, but I was wondering if there is another one out there.  Thanks, --[[User:CapitalR|CapitalR]] 17:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

281471 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-17 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.184740800E09 +++$+++ What? -- +++$+++ What? --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 23:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
281472 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281471 +++$+++ 281471 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.184743260E09 +++$+++ What what.  +++$+++ :What what. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 00:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
281473 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281471 +++$+++ 281472 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.184743560E09 +++$+++ What do you mean the're not related? -- +++$+++ ::What do you mean the're not related? --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 00:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
281474 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281471 +++$+++ 281473 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.184743800E09 +++$+++ Because it's only a rumour. Their supposed relation has never stepped outside of \"might be\" or \"could be\".  +++$+++ :::Because it's only a rumour. Their supposed relation has never stepped outside of "might be" or "could be". [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 00:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
281475 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281471 +++$+++ 281474 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.184744160E09 +++$+++ You're the man Deadkid. -- +++$+++ ::::You're the man Deadkid. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 00:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
281476 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281471 +++$+++ 281471 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.184751660E09 +++$+++ Nice rewrite on the [[Liu Feng]] page, but Liao Hua was the one who ratted out Liu Feng's disobediance to Liu Bei. Because right before Guan Yu was killed, he wrote off and requested troops from Liu Feng and he was refused. So he rode back to changdu i believe and told Liu Bei. I won't add that to the article since you may disagree, but if you want to you can add it.  -- +++$+++ :Nice rewrite on the [[Liu Feng]] page, but Liao Hua was the one who ratted out Liu Feng's disobediance to Liu Bei. Because right before Guan Yu was killed, he wrote off and requested troops from Liu Feng and he was refused. So he rode back to changdu i believe and told Liu Bei. I won't add that to the article since you may disagree, but if you want to you can add it.  --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 02:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
281477 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281471 +++$+++ 281476 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.184751900E09 +++$+++ That was from the novel, and I have just added such a section.  +++$+++ ::That was from the novel, and I have just added such a section. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 02:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
281478 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281471 +++$+++ 281477 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.184752140E09 +++$+++ are you sure it wasn't in Records? i read both and oftne get them mixed up. But i thought it was in both...-- +++$+++ :::are you sure it wasn't in Records? i read both and oftne get them mixed up. But i thought it was in both...--[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 02:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
281479 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281471 +++$+++ 281478 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.184752500E09 +++$+++ Nope, neither Liu Feng nor Liao Hua's biography mentioned that. Liao Hua couldn't be the messenger anyways because he only came back from Jingzhou when Liu Bei went to fight in the battle of Yiling.  +++$+++ ::::Nope, neither Liu Feng nor Liao Hua's biography mentioned that. Liao Hua couldn't be the messenger anyways because he only came back from Jingzhou when Liu Bei went to fight in the battle of Yiling. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 02:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
281480 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281471 +++$+++ 281477 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.184752260E09 +++$+++ Good work though Deadkid_dk, you're a good editer. -- +++$+++ :::Good work though Deadkid_dk, you're a good editer. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 02:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

543617 +++$+++ Opabinia regalis +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-30 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.159607820E09 +++$+++ Nice figure for [[structural alignment]], thanks! What program do you usually use for molecular images? (In case you didn't see it, there is an open, if not exactly ongoing, discussion on the MCB proposals page about whether or not to recommend a particular program and if so, which one to choose.)  +++$+++ Nice figure for [[structural alignment]], thanks! What program do you usually use for molecular images? (In case you didn't see it, there is an open, if not exactly ongoing, discussion on the MCB proposals page about whether or not to recommend a particular program and if so, which one to choose.) [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] 02:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
543618 +++$+++ Opabinia regalis +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543617 +++$+++ 543617 +++$+++ 2006-09-30 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.159608720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the response. I didn't realize that could produce such nice images; I had associated it in my mind with more basic functions because that's all I've ever seen it used for. (And I guess you did see the help page discussion; sorry for bad memory :) Keep up the exceptionally good work!  +++$+++ :Thanks for the response. I didn't realize that could produce such nice images; I had associated it in my mind with more basic functions because that's all I've ever seen it used for. (And I guess you did see the help page discussion; sorry for bad memory :) Keep up the exceptionally good work! [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] 02:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

19330 +++$+++ Jooler +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-12 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.150174680E09 +++$+++ But this is something so familiar it doesn't need a citation, it is like asking for a citation that God Save The Queen is played before football matches involving England.  +++$+++ But this is something so familiar it doesn't need a citation, it is like asking for a citation that God Save The Queen is played before football matches involving England. [[User:Jooler|Jooler]] 21:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
19331 +++$+++ Jooler +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19330 +++$+++ 19330 +++$+++ 2006-06-12 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.150174800E09 +++$+++ Actually on TV I've heard it being played on the public address systems at the Stadiums during the half-time and at the end of the matches of the World Cup that is on at the moment.  +++$+++ :Actually on TV I've heard it being played on the public address systems at the Stadiums during the half-time and at the end of the matches of the World Cup that is on at the moment. [[User:Jooler|Jooler]] 22:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

19332 +++$+++ Ericorbit +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-15 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.150435320E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks!  Glad someone appreciates them.  It's something I've wanted to do for a long time and I was motivated to begin because I saw that someone started them for UK number-ones.  I'm working backwards and I'm up to 1974 right now, but of course this is not counting all the number-one songs that don't have articles yet... plus it gives me a chance to clean up all of them as I go thru.  Still lots of work to be done!  btw, keep up the good work yourself... especially on the PSB stuff! --  +++$+++ Hey, thanks!  Glad someone appreciates them.  It's something I've wanted to do for a long time and I was motivated to begin because I saw that someone started them for UK number-ones.  I'm working backwards and I'm up to 1974 right now, but of course this is not counting all the number-one songs that don't have articles yet... plus it gives me a chance to clean up all of them as I go thru.  Still lots of work to be done!  btw, keep up the good work yourself... especially on the PSB stuff! -- [[User:Ericorbit|eo]] 22:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
19333 +++$+++ Ericorbit +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19332 +++$+++ 19332 +++$+++ 2006-06-17 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.150611540E09 +++$+++ Actually that category had quite a number of entries before I started the succession box thing.  There is another editor who seems to have gotten wind of what Im doing and is a couple steps ahead of me, creating a whole bunch of those one-and-two-line stubs.  It doesn't bother me - once I'm done with the succession boxes and all the wikilinks are correct I want to expand most or all of them.  Adding them to the category now rather than later is just one less thing that will have to be done once the boxes are completed. --  +++$+++ :Actually that category had quite a number of entries before I started the succession box thing.  There is another editor who seems to have gotten wind of what Im doing and is a couple steps ahead of me, creating a whole bunch of those one-and-two-line stubs.  It doesn't bother me - once I'm done with the succession boxes and all the wikilinks are correct I want to expand most or all of them.  Adding them to the category now rather than later is just one less thing that will have to be done once the boxes are completed. -- [[User:Ericorbit|eo]] 23:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

19337 +++$+++ Ericorbit +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-12 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.152744060E09 +++$+++ Hey, when you get a moment can you take a look at [[Love Is a Stranger]]?  The song was re-released twice and I thought I added the \"extra chronology\" info correctly but I can't get it to appear when I save the page.  Apparently I'm doing something wrong.  Please and thank you!  --  +++$+++ Hey, when you get a moment can you take a look at [[Love Is a Stranger]]?  The song was re-released twice and I thought I added the "extra chronology" info correctly but I can't get it to appear when I save the page.  Apparently I'm doing something wrong.  Please and thank you!  -- [[User:Ericorbit|eo]] 15:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
19338 +++$+++ Ericorbit +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19337 +++$+++ 19337 +++$+++ 2006-07-13 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.152822720E09 +++$+++ Never mind, I figured out what I was doing incorrectly.  Actually it wasn't me - it was ''all'' the infobox's fault.  I am so fucking smart.  Are you completely amazed?  Thanks anyway :-)  --  +++$+++ :Never mind, I figured out what I was doing incorrectly.  Actually it wasn't me - it was ''all'' the infobox's fault.  I am so fucking smart.  Are you completely amazed?  Thanks anyway :-)  -- [[User:Ericorbit|eo]] 13:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

396439 +++$+++ LordViD +++$+++ Dmn +++$+++ 396439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-11 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.134358920E09 +++$+++ I don't understand what you mean by the bolded phrase. Their title perhaps? Their middle name? I don't know. Do I have to bribe you for the answer? :-) <font>&laquo;<\/font> +++$+++ I don't understand what you mean by the bolded phrase. Their title perhaps? Their middle name? I don't know. Do I have to bribe you for the answer? :-) <font>&laquo;</font>[[user:LordViD|<font color="black">'''Lord'''</font>]][[user talk:LordViD|<font color="grey">'''ViD'''</font>]]<font>&raquo;</font> 19:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
396440 +++$+++ Dmn +++$+++ Dmn +++$+++ 396439 +++$+++ 396439 +++$+++ 2005-12-11 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.134361140E09 +++$+++ When you work out what the connection, the appropriate extra words will become obvious.  +++$+++ :When you work out what the connection, the appropriate extra words will become obvious. [[User:Dmn|Dmn]] 20:19, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
396441 +++$+++ LordViD +++$+++ Dmn +++$+++ 396439 +++$+++ 396440 +++$+++ 2005-12-11 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.134362160E09 +++$+++ I knew you'd say that....Thanks anyways. <font>&laquo;<\/font> +++$+++ ::I knew you'd say that....Thanks anyways. <font>&laquo;</font>[[user:LordViD|<font color="black">'''Lord'''</font>]][[user talk:LordViD|<font color="grey">'''ViD'''</font>]]<font>&raquo;</font> 20:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

281485 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-23 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.185214860E09 +++$+++ Hey, dk.  I just noticed you're name in this article's history.  I'm doing a major overhaul and need some references regarding fan\/critic response, but I've hit a wall and can't seem to find any.  You know where I can get a few? Probably more than two or three professional reviews and fan-based ratings.  +++$+++ Hey, dk.  I just noticed you're name in this article's history.  I'm doing a major overhaul and need some references regarding fan/critic response, but I've hit a wall and can't seem to find any.  You know where I can get a few? Probably more than two or three professional reviews and fan-based ratings. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 11:21, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
281486 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.185215220E09 +++$+++ As this game isn't known in the Anglosphere at all (not that I know of)...it's quite difficult to give you any. Your best bet would be to find Chinese\/Japanese\/Korean sources, but I don't know any websites that provide professional reviews in those languages. Sorry mate.  +++$+++ :As this game isn't known in the Anglosphere at all (not that I know of)...it's quite difficult to give you any. Your best bet would be to find Chinese/Japanese/Korean sources, but I don't know any websites that provide professional reviews in those languages. Sorry mate. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 11:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
281487 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ 281486 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.185215580E09 +++$+++ Already tried every resource I can find.  Didn't find anything.  Or maybe I did and just can't read it :) Oh well, that'll have to do.  +++$+++ ::Already tried every resource I can find.  Didn't find anything.  Or maybe I did and just can't read it :) Oh well, that'll have to do. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 11:33, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
281488 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ 281487 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.185216600E09 +++$+++ There are some forum posts and personal sites though. (In all relevant languages)  +++$+++ :::There are some forum posts and personal sites though. (In all relevant languages) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 11:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
281489 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ 281488 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.185217320E09 +++$+++ I've only come across one single fan review on every forum I've looked in. Fan site might be the best bet right now. What's the address?  +++$+++ ::::I've only come across one single fan review on every forum I've looked in. Fan site might be the best bet right now. What's the address? [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 12:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
281490 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ 281489 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.185218220E09 +++$+++ Do you mind if it's in Chinese?  +++$+++ :::::Do you mind if it's in Chinese? [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 12:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
281491 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ 281489 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.185218460E09 +++$+++ You might also want to search for \"Legend of Cao Cao\"  +++$+++ :::::You might also want to search for "Legend of Cao Cao" [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 12:21, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
281492 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ 281491 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.185218640E09 +++$+++ I'll try that.  And if the fansite is in Chinese, I can add that to the bottom of the article.  I'll try the Legend of Cao Cao thing, first, though.  +++$+++ ::::::I'll try that.  And if the fansite is in Chinese, I can add that to the bottom of the article.  I'll try the Legend of Cao Cao thing, first, though. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 12:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
281493 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ 281492 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.185218940E09 +++$+++ Legend of Cao Cao's no good.  Found some avatars from the game, but there's a mission in DW4: XL entitled \"Legend of Cao Cao\".  It's flooding every search.  +++$+++ :::::::Legend of Cao Cao's no good.  Found some avatars from the game, but there's a mission in DW4: XL entitled "Legend of Cao Cao".  It's flooding every search. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 12:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
281494 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ 281493 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.185219060E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/home.kimo.com.tw\/renhaosan\/new_page_65.htm It's a full review, in Chinese].  +++$+++ ::::::::[http://home.kimo.com.tw/renhaosan/new_page_65.htm It's a full review, in Chinese]. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 12:31, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
281495 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ 281494 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.185219600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for that... ah... happen to know what it says, by any chance?  +++$+++ :::::::::Thanks for that... ah... happen to know what it says, by any chance? [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 12:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
281496 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281485 +++$+++ 281495 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.185219780E09 +++$+++ Uh...give me a day or two.  +++$+++ ::::::::::Uh...give me a day or two. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 12:43, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

19342 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19342 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-18 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.155970140E09 +++$+++ You're doing just fine, but thank you for letting me know.  +++$+++ You're doing just fine, but thank you for letting me know. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 23:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
19343 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19342 +++$+++ 19342 +++$+++ 2006-08-21 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.156192080E09 +++$+++ ...d'oh! You're completely right, that's ''exactly'' what happened. [[User:Srsiesta|Srsiesta]] blanked the article and replaced the text with his own material, and I didn't notice that. I'm sorry.  +++$+++ :...d'oh! You're completely right, that's ''exactly'' what happened. [[User:Srsiesta|Srsiesta]] blanked the article and replaced the text with his own material, and I didn't notice that. I'm sorry. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 13:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

19344 +++$+++ Jogers +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19344 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-22 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.156265460E09 +++$+++ You mean that inserting data into a sample template doesn't change the template itself? Isn't it self explanatory? Sorry for replying late, I've been away.  +++$+++ You mean that inserting data into a sample template doesn't change the template itself? Isn't it self explanatory? Sorry for replying late, I've been away. [[User:Jogers|Jogers]] ([[User_talk:Jogers|talk]]) 09:51, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
19345 +++$+++ Jogers +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19344 +++$+++ 19344 +++$+++ 2006-08-24 09:24:00 +++$+++ 1.156436640E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure if that was the case here neither but please go ahead and add any message you find appropriate. Consider adding the link to [[Wikipedia:Template namespace]] to provide inexperienced editors with basic information about templates.  +++$+++ :I'm not sure if that was the case here neither but please go ahead and add any message you find appropriate. Consider adding the link to [[Wikipedia:Template namespace]] to provide inexperienced editors with basic information about templates. [[User:Jogers|Jogers]] ([[User_talk:Jogers|talk]]) 09:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

571203 +++$+++ JROBBO +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-17 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.163769420E09 +++$+++ Hi - you mention on your talk page that you are able to get a photo of some things in Canberra. I've been doing up the NSW railway station pages, which includes the ACT page, and the photo for Canberra station isn't too good, and it has a steam train in the middle of it too. I was wondering that if you had time, would you be able to cycle over to Kingston and get a photo of the railway station when the train isn't there. Trains arrive at 11:21am Monday to Saturday, 4:29pm on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays and Sundays, and 10:31pm on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays and Sundays  - so there are always 2 trains a day. If you get there about half an hour before the train arrives you should find that the station is open and you can go onto the platform to take a photo. If you could help that would be great. A photo like that of the one in [[Queanbeyan railway station, New South Wales]] would be the sort of thing I'm after - good coverage of the station platform. Any help would be great. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi - you mention on your talk page that you are able to get a photo of some things in Canberra. I've been doing up the NSW railway station pages, which includes the ACT page, and the photo for Canberra station isn't too good, and it has a steam train in the middle of it too. I was wondering that if you had time, would you be able to cycle over to Kingston and get a photo of the railway station when the train isn't there. Trains arrive at 11:21am Monday to Saturday, 4:29pm on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays and Sundays, and 10:31pm on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays and Sundays  - so there are always 2 trains a day. If you get there about half an hour before the train arrives you should find that the station is open and you can go onto the platform to take a photo. If you could help that would be great. A photo like that of the one in [[Queanbeyan railway station, New South Wales]] would be the sort of thing I'm after - good coverage of the station platform. Any help would be great. Thanks. [[User:JROBBO|JROBBO]] 05:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
571204 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571203 +++$+++ 571203 +++$+++ 2006-11-21 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164126840E09 +++$+++ Hmm... this will be difficult for me, I live quite aways away. I'll see what I can do. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Hmm... this will be difficult for me, I live quite aways away. I'll see what I can do. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/FAQ|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 08:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

483822 +++$+++ Vampire Warrior +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-16 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.195212900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for protection. I have a good clue who did it. [http:\/\/runescape.wikia.com\/wiki\/User:Speckledorph Speckledorph of the RuneScape Wikia]. I was speaking with him on MSN and he mentioned going offline to try an \"msn sock\", so I think he loaded up www.proxy.org and fired up a proxy to vandalize with... <span style=\"background:#000\"> ''' +++$+++ Thanks for protection. I have a good clue who did it. [http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/User:Speckledorph Speckledorph of the RuneScape Wikia]. I was speaking with him on MSN and he mentioned going offline to try an "msn sock", so I think he loaded up www.proxy.org and fired up a proxy to vandalize with... <span style="background:#000"> '''[[User:Vampire Warrior|<span style="color:#d00">Vamp</span><span style="color:#b00">ire </span>]][[User_talk:Vampire Warrior|<span style="color:#800">Warr</span><span style="color:#600">ior</span>]]'''</span> 03:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
483823 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483822 +++$+++ 483822 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.195213140E09 +++$+++ Any idea which proxy site he used?  I'll shut it down permanently.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Any idea which proxy site he used?  I'll shut it down permanently.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
483824 +++$+++ Vampire Warrior +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483822 +++$+++ 483823 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.195213260E09 +++$+++ I don't know. I do know you just go to [http:\/\/www.proxy.org here] and choose one of 4000 proxies off the list. Most of them are blocked and labelled as open proxies. I checked. Turns out, he says it wasn't him. I know it was someone from the RuneScape Wikia. I have a good idea as to whom..... <span style=\"background:#000\">''' +++$+++ ::I don't know. I do know you just go to [http://www.proxy.org here] and choose one of 4000 proxies off the list. Most of them are blocked and labelled as open proxies. I checked. Turns out, he says it wasn't him. I know it was someone from the RuneScape Wikia. I have a good idea as to whom..... <span style="background:#000">'''[[User:Vampire Warrior|<span style="color:#d00">Vamp</span><span style="color:#b00">ire </span>]][[User_talk:Vampire Warrior|<span style="color:#800">Warr</span><span style="color:#600">ior</span>]]'''</span> 03:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
483825 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483822 +++$+++ 483824 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.195213740E09 +++$+++ I'm somewhat familiar with that site.  I sometimes hunt for open proxies there so I can permanently block them here.  Let me know if you find a connection here and I'll do what I can.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::I'm somewhat familiar with that site.  I sometimes hunt for open proxies there so I can permanently block them here.  Let me know if you find a connection here and I'll do what I can.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
483826 +++$+++ Vampire Warrior +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483822 +++$+++ 483825 +++$+++ 2007-11-16 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.195214160E09 +++$+++ Back on Wikibreak I go. <span style=\"background:#000\">''' +++$+++ ::::Back on Wikibreak I go. <span style="background:#000">'''[[User:Vampire Warrior|<span style="color:#d00">Vamp</span><span style="color:#b00">ire </span>]][[User_talk:Vampire Warrior|<span style="color:#800">Warr</span><span style="color:#600">ior</span>]]'''</span> 03:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

19350 +++$+++ 23skidoo +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-11 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.158030480E09 +++$+++ Just noticing the addition of the Other Uses template to [[Laurie Anderson]], I'm curious as to the point of adding the template since the wording ends up being identical to what was there before anyway. I've been noticing this template turning up on other articles and it seems to be kinda pointless.  +++$+++ Just noticing the addition of the Other Uses template to [[Laurie Anderson]], I'm curious as to the point of adding the template since the wording ends up being identical to what was there before anyway. I've been noticing this template turning up on other articles and it seems to be kinda pointless. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 20:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
19351 +++$+++ 23skidoo +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19350 +++$+++ 19350 +++$+++ 2006-09-12 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.158048840E09 +++$+++ Interesting. I guess what struck me as odd was I wrote the original dab statement having never seen the OtherUses template -- I guess great minds ''do'' think alike! ;)  +++$+++ : Interesting. I guess what struck me as odd was I wrote the original dab statement having never seen the OtherUses template -- I guess great minds ''do'' think alike! ;) [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 01:14, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

585490 +++$+++ Dihydrogen Monoxide +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-03 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.209805920E09 +++$+++ Here's a [[Shrimp]] for you! Shrimps somehow promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully they have made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! '' +++$+++ Here's a [[Shrimp]] for you! Shrimps somehow promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully they have made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! ''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|dihydrogen monoxide]]'' <small>([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|H<sub>2</sub>O]])</small> 02:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
585491 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585490 +++$+++ 585490 +++$+++ 2008-05-03 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.209806100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the shrimp! :)  +++$+++ :Thanks for the shrimp! :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 02:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

543643 +++$+++ WAS 4.250 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-31 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.162286160E09 +++$+++ I'll accept any solution you offer at [[Flu vaccine]].  +++$+++ I'll accept any solution you offer at [[Flu vaccine]]. [[User:WAS 4.250|WAS 4.250]] 01:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
543644 +++$+++ Ogno +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543643 +++$+++ 543643 +++$+++ 2006-10-31 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.162289460E09 +++$+++ I have no problem with that you try to reach a consensus. I also have no problems to see another version... as you can see I already tryed myself to post another version. My main point is to insert the study in some way into the article. greetings  +++$+++ :I have no problem with that you try to reach a consensus. I also have no problems to see another version... as you can see I already tryed myself to post another version. My main point is to insert the study in some way into the article. greetings [[User:Ogno|Ogno]] 02:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
543645 +++$+++ Ogno +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543643 +++$+++ 543644 +++$+++ 2006-10-31 08:35:00 +++$+++ 1.162312500E09 +++$+++ My email has been set up now, so it should be possible for you to email me from my User page.  +++$+++ ::My email has been set up now, so it should be possible for you to email me from my User page. [[User:Ogno|Ogno]] 08:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
543646 +++$+++ Ogno +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543643 +++$+++ 543644 +++$+++ 2006-10-31 08:41:00 +++$+++ 1.162312860E09 +++$+++ But to be honest you realy don't have to send me the pdf since I will have no time to read it anyway... I trust you that you will come forward with a good text for mentioning this study.  +++$+++ ::But to be honest you realy don't have to send me the pdf since I will have no time to read it anyway... I trust you that you will come forward with a good text for mentioning this study. [[User:Ogno|Ogno]] 08:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

281500 +++$+++ Caiguanhao +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281500 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-26 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.185475140E09 +++$+++ Please give me the reason why you did at [[Kai Tak Airport]]. Why unnecessary? -  +++$+++ Please give me the reason why you did at [[Kai Tak Airport]]. Why unnecessary? - [[User:Caiguanhao|Caiguanhao]] 11:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
281501 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281500 +++$+++ 281500 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.185476520E09 +++$+++ Chat [[Talk:Hong Kong|here]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ :Chat [[Talk:Hong Kong|here]]. Thank you. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 12:02, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

19357 +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-05 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.167987660E09 +++$+++ I guess my edit summary was a bit authoritarian, but it was really just a judgment call rather than any hard-and-fast ruling and I don't have anything against putting both lines there. The thing is that there are only two blue links at [[Roger Manning (disambiguation)]] and one red link (with little explanation), so don't the specific link and the disambiguation link amount to the same thing? (Or do people tend to confuse the keyboardist and the anti-folk musician often?) \u2013 +++$+++ I guess my edit summary was a bit authoritarian, but it was really just a judgment call rather than any hard-and-fast ruling and I don't have anything against putting both lines there. The thing is that there are only two blue links at [[Roger Manning (disambiguation)]] and one red link (with little explanation), so don't the specific link and the disambiguation link amount to the same thing? (Or do people tend to confuse the keyboardist and the anti-folk musician often?) –[[User:Unint|Unint]] 01:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
19358 +++$+++ MrFizyx +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19357 +++$+++ 19357 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.167988560E09 +++$+++ Another editor has reduced [[Roger Manning (disambiguation)]] to the point where it is scarcely needed.  There has been some confusion here about the two men.  The keyboardist is also more and more often billed as simply \"Roger Manning\"--early in his career he may have used the longer name to distinguish himself from the once popular, but now inactive anti-folkie (just a guess).  Also, both artists have had some association with [[Beck]].  For a some time we had one page that mixed-up facts about the two.  If anything I'd drop the link to the generic dab page. - +++$+++ :Another editor has reduced [[Roger Manning (disambiguation)]] to the point where it is scarcely needed.  There has been some confusion here about the two men.  The keyboardist is also more and more often billed as simply "Roger Manning"--early in his career he may have used the longer name to distinguish himself from the once popular, but now inactive anti-folkie (just a guess).  Also, both artists have had some association with [[Beck]].  For a some time we had one page that mixed-up facts about the two.  If anything I'd drop the link to the generic dab page. -[[User:MrFizyx|MrFizyx]] 01:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

281502 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-26 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.185490980E09 +++$+++ Before you do a mass revert in all the pages i added categories to, can you please tell me next time. I today, like i did with Wei and Shu yesterday, added categories to Wu generals, just to find out you disagreed and decided to to a mass edit flip. I don't mind if you disagree and revert, but if you're going to do something like that can you please inform me so i don't spend a half an hour doing the same thing the next day. Thank you. -- +++$+++ Before you do a mass revert in all the pages i added categories to, can you please tell me next time. I today, like i did with Wei and Shu yesterday, added categories to Wu generals, just to find out you disagreed and decided to to a mass edit flip. I don't mind if you disagree and revert, but if you're going to do something like that can you please inform me so i don't spend a half an hour doing the same thing the next day. Thank you. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 16:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
281503 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281502 +++$+++ 281502 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.185514500E09 +++$+++ Sure, I didn't revert everything though.  +++$+++ :Sure, I didn't revert everything though. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
281504 +++$+++  +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281502 +++$+++ 281502 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ p.s. When someone mass reverted you, I think that's a cue for you not to continue. 22:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :p.s. When someone mass reverted you, I think that's a cue for you not to continue. 22:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
281505 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281502 +++$+++ 281504 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.185516300E09 +++$+++ Well i only saw that you reverted the Guan Yu category, so  ia assumed you did the same with the rest. But the thing was i added the categories and moved on so I was unaware that many were reverted, so today i finshed up, and when done realized i just spent all thattime and did all that work that i could have spent doinf something else. Thanks again. -- +++$+++ ::Well i only saw that you reverted the Guan Yu category, so  ia assumed you did the same with the rest. But the thing was i added the categories and moved on so I was unaware that many were reverted, so today i finshed up, and when done realized i just spent all thattime and did all that work that i could have spent doinf something else. Thanks again. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 23:05, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
281506 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281502 +++$+++ 281505 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.185516360E09 +++$+++ I'll remember to notify you next time.  +++$+++ :::I'll remember to notify you next time. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 23:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

571205 +++$+++ AmiDaniel +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.163861700E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Dfrg.msc! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply [[User:AmiDaniel\/VandalProof|download and install VandalProof from our main page]]. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other [[User:AmiDaniel\/VandalProof#Moderators|moderator]], or you can post a message on [[User:AmiDaniel\/VP\/Discuss|the discussion page]].  +++$+++ Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Dfrg.msc! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply [[User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof|download and install VandalProof from our main page]]. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other [[User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof#Moderators|moderator]], or you can post a message on [[User:AmiDaniel/VP/Discuss|the discussion page]]. [[User:AmiDaniel|AmiDaniel]] ([[User talk:AmiDaniel|talk]]) 06:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
571206 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571205 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Nice work <s>Dfrg.msc<\/s> wikifather.  23:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ ::Nice work <s>Dfrg.msc</s> wikifather.  23:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

543650 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-31 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.162362480E09 +++$+++ and make suggestions\/criticisms, FA-related and otherwise?  I'm sure that you'd find many things to correct or improve!  Thanks muchly and hoping your departmental retreat was fun,  +++$+++ and make suggestions/criticisms, FA-related and otherwise?  I'm sure that you'd find many things to correct or improve!  Thanks muchly and hoping your departmental retreat was fun, [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 22:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
543651 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543650 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-31 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.162364760E09 +++$+++ He's commenting on the viewpoint of somebody else, I'll certainly have a look at this page. Thanks for the suggestion.  +++$+++ ::He's commenting on the viewpoint of somebody else, I'll certainly have a look at this page. Thanks for the suggestion. [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 23:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

281507 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-27 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.185525000E09 +++$+++ Is it me or are we constantly clashing heads? I mean I don't really mind it because you are clearly a good editer out to help the cause of wikipedia, but it seems we are always disagreeing on various issues, and on what does or does not belong. As i said earlier, I don't think its anything hostile, its probably not even a friendly rivalry, its just something I noticed. -- +++$+++ Is it me or are we constantly clashing heads? I mean I don't really mind it because you are clearly a good editer out to help the cause of wikipedia, but it seems we are always disagreeing on various issues, and on what does or does not belong. As i said earlier, I don't think its anything hostile, its probably not even a friendly rivalry, its just something I noticed. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 01:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
281508 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281507 +++$+++ 281507 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 02:12:00 +++$+++ 1.185527520E09 +++$+++ I meant no offense. I don't mean to disagree with you always, it is just unfortunate that we stand on opposite sides much of the time. We have different set of values, I guess.  +++$+++ :I meant no offense. I don't mean to disagree with you always, it is just unfortunate that we stand on opposite sides much of the time. We have different set of values, I guess. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 02:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

19365 +++$+++ Circeus +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19365 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.171688520E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Circeus|Circeus]] 21:02, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
19366 +++$+++ Circeus +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19365 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.171689660E09 +++$+++ bad cut-and-pasting: The best we can do is educate the users as they come, I'm afraid. +++$+++ :*bad cut-and-pasting: The best we can do is educate the users as they come, I'm afraid.[[User:Circeus|Circeus]] 21:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
19367 +++$+++ Circeus +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19365 +++$+++ 19365 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.171689660E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Circeus|Circeus]] 21:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
19368 +++$+++ Circeus +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19365 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.171690860E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Title.gif]]. See [[Wikipedia:Image file names]]. I'm gonna fix it as soon as I'm done with my watchlist. +++$+++ ::*[[:Image:Title.gif]]. See [[Wikipedia:Image file names]]. I'm gonna fix it as soon as I'm done with my watchlist.[[User:Circeus|Circeus]] 21:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

281510 +++$+++ AiselneDrossel +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-02 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.186077900E09 +++$+++ I'm not irate at this decision, rather I respect it but am having difficulty trying to comprehend it; as my goal was only to improve an article could you offer me an explanation as to the neccesity of the revert?  +++$+++ I'm not irate at this decision, rather I respect it but am having difficulty trying to comprehend it; as my goal was only to improve an article could you offer me an explanation as to the neccesity of the revert? [[User:AiselneDrossel|AiselneDrossel]] 11:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
281511 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281510 +++$+++ 281510 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.186117380E09 +++$+++ A merge does not mean a copy and paste, however clean it might be. I also don't think the two topics should be merged in the first place.  +++$+++ :A merge does not mean a copy and paste, however clean it might be. I also don't think the two topics should be merged in the first place. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:03, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

281512 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281512 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-02 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.186114680E09 +++$+++ Hi dk, [[User:Jmabel]] is an old friend of mine.. he's working on [[Chin Gee Hee]] .. if there's anything you could do to help, I'd be eternally in your debt. later!  +++$+++ Hi dk, [[User:Jmabel]] is an old friend of mine.. he's working on [[Chin Gee Hee]] .. if there's anything you could do to help, I'd be eternally in your debt. later! [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 21:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
281513 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281512 +++$+++ 281512 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.186117440E09 +++$+++ I have never heard of this person before, so I can't do a thing.  +++$+++ :I have never heard of this person before, so I can't do a thing. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:04, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
281514 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281512 +++$+++ 281512 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 05:33:00 +++$+++ 1.186144380E09 +++$+++ '''[[Template:People of the Three Kingdoms|Aye aye captain!]]'''  +++$+++ * '''[[Template:People of the Three Kingdoms|Aye aye captain!]]''' [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 05:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
281515 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281512 +++$+++ 281512 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.186144740E09 +++$+++ Thank you. Though this is only a temporary measure intended to shove the whole thing under the carpet for a while, we'll need to figure out a way to refactor the template in the future. But that can wait until you all are free :)  +++$+++ :Thank you. Though this is only a temporary measure intended to shove the whole thing under the carpet for a while, we'll need to figure out a way to refactor the template in the future. But that can wait until you all are free :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 05:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

265372 +++$+++ John FitzGerald +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265372 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-26 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.151357580E09 +++$+++ The problem with [[Reinforcement]] is that people keep butchering the article. I hadn't looked at it for a while until your comment turned up on my watchlist, and I was shocked at how the article has been eviscerated. In at least two versions of the page there were complete descriptions of reinforcement schedules. Unless you can suggest some way in which the article could be protected I ain't touching it any more.  +++$+++ The problem with [[Reinforcement]] is that people keep butchering the article. I hadn't looked at it for a while until your comment turned up on my watchlist, and I was shocked at how the article has been eviscerated. In at least two versions of the page there were complete descriptions of reinforcement schedules. Unless you can suggest some way in which the article could be protected I ain't touching it any more. [[User:John FitzGerald|John FitzGerald]] 14:33, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
265373 +++$+++ John FitzGerald +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265372 +++$+++ 265372 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.151392380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply. I hadn't thought the remark was directed at me. It's just that this sort of article history seems to be a serious problem here. But maybe I'll work on my patience and then try to fix it up.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the reply. I hadn't thought the remark was directed at me. It's just that this sort of article history seems to be a serious problem here. But maybe I'll work on my patience and then try to fix it up. [[User:John FitzGerald|John FitzGerald]] 00:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

19371 +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-25 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.172401620E09 +++$+++ About the context - Believe me, I'd love to find more material for this, but everything I've found seems to focus less on her and more on more recently prominent crossover acts (Josh Groban, Il Divo, etc.) I'm working on it though. Not sure I should mention Amelia since she doesn't have an album out yet and it's going to be released independently. I still need to update for the greatest hits albums; looking for good solid information on that.  +++$+++ About the context - Believe me, I'd love to find more material for this, but everything I've found seems to focus less on her and more on more recently prominent crossover acts (Josh Groban, Il Divo, etc.) I'm working on it though. Not sure I should mention Amelia since she doesn't have an album out yet and it's going to be released independently. I still need to update for the greatest hits albums; looking for good solid information on that. [[User:Crystallina|Crystallina]] 03:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
19372 +++$+++ Crystallina +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19371 +++$+++ 19371 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.173247920E09 +++$+++ Also, I forgot to ask - Do you by any chance have a free picture of her or know where I can find one? I've asked the official forums about twenty times and they're being very unresponsive. Also asked around with copyright owners without success. (There's a listing on requests for pictures but with the backlog I'm not holding my breath.)  +++$+++ :Also, I forgot to ask - Do you by any chance have a free picture of her or know where I can find one? I've asked the official forums about twenty times and they're being very unresponsive. Also asked around with copyright owners without success. (There's a listing on requests for pictures but with the backlog I'm not holding my breath.) [[User:Crystallina|Crystallina]] 22:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

543660 +++$+++ 87.223.209.132 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.163669820E09 +++$+++ My login name is pablo2garcia.  +++$+++ My login name is pablo2garcia. [[User:87.223.209.132|87.223.209.132]] 01:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
543661 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543660 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.163676900E09 +++$+++ Hola, Pablo &mdash; encantada! :)  I can assure you that Tim is nice, and ''very'' smart; you can be sure that he had a good reason for his reversions.  Speaking for myself (who am not so smart), the disagreement may hinge on the choice of words; in English, we generally distinguish between the virus and the disease, i.e., we treat them as two separate things.  More generally, please allow me to encourage you to log in under your user name, [[User:Pablo2garcia|Pablo2garcia]], to assume good faith and to continue contributing! Con affetto! :)  +++$+++ ::Hola, Pablo &mdash; encantada! :)  I can assure you that Tim is nice, and ''very'' smart; you can be sure that he had a good reason for his reversions.  Speaking for myself (who am not so smart), the disagreement may hinge on the choice of words; in English, we generally distinguish between the virus and the disease, i.e., we treat them as two separate things.  More generally, please allow me to encourage you to log in under your user name, [[User:Pablo2garcia|Pablo2garcia]], to assume good faith and to continue contributing! Con affetto! :) [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 03:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

281518 +++$+++ Luvcraft +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281518 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-16 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.187323680E09 +++$+++ thanks for fixing my mistake that that entry on \"fuck\" was from [[Moetan]]. Can you tell me what book it is from? Is it something that's a parody of Moetan? Thanks!  +++$+++ thanks for fixing my mistake that that entry on "fuck" was from [[Moetan]]. Can you tell me what book it is from? Is it something that's a parody of Moetan? Thanks! [[User:Luvcraft|Luvcraft]] 21:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
281519 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281518 +++$+++ 281518 +++$+++ 2007-08-17 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.187336520E09 +++$+++ It is a parody of Moetan, but its name escapes me. Sorry.  +++$+++ :It is a parody of Moetan, but its name escapes me. Sorry. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 00:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
281520 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281518 +++$+++ 281519 +++$+++ 2007-09-08 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.189246620E09 +++$+++ A bit late, but the profanity-spewing English learning material is [http:\/\/pixel-maritan.net\/ Pixel Maritan].  +++$+++ ::A bit late, but the profanity-spewing English learning material is [http://pixel-maritan.net/ Pixel Maritan]. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 03:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

19376 +++$+++ Jethero +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19376 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-01 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.175483100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for fixing my ascii copy-'n'-paste blunder on [[DNA Microarray]] with international characters in interwiki links. Nice catch.  +++$+++ Thanks for fixing my ascii copy-'n'-paste blunder on [[DNA Microarray]] with international characters in interwiki links. Nice catch. [[User:Jethero|Jethero]] 20:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
19377 +++$+++ Wickethewok +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19376 +++$+++ 19376 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.176383340E09 +++$+++ The Orb was just promoted to featured article.  Thank you for all your feedback and work you've put into it.  Cheers!   +++$+++ *The Orb was just promoted to featured article.  Thank you for all your feedback and work you've put into it.  Cheers!  [[User:Wickethewok|Wickethewok]] 06:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

543665 +++$+++ Malkinann +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543665 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-23 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.164277800E09 +++$+++ Firstly, good on ya for all of your work on those citations!  Some of the more fantastic (yet true!) claims in that article may still need to be cited, such as \"There are more bacterial cells on each of our bodies than there are cells of our own\".  I'd also like to see a bit more information about bacteria's use as a bio-factory for \"and more recently, the industrial production of antibiotics and other chemicals.\"  I thought that only E. coli used as such?  Again, congratulations on all of your hard work - hopefully it'll be recognised by the GA reviewers.  -  +++$+++ Firstly, good on ya for all of your work on those citations!  Some of the more fantastic (yet true!) claims in that article may still need to be cited, such as "There are more bacterial cells on each of our bodies than there are cells of our own".  I'd also like to see a bit more information about bacteria's use as a bio-factory for "and more recently, the industrial production of antibiotics and other chemicals."  I thought that only E. coli used as such?  Again, congratulations on all of your hard work - hopefully it'll be recognised by the GA reviewers.  - [[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 02:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
543666 +++$+++ Malkinann +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543665 +++$+++ 543665 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.164425520E09 +++$+++ Can bacteria really live in nuclear waste? -  +++$+++ :Can bacteria really live in nuclear waste? - [[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 19:32, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
543667 +++$+++ Malkinann +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543665 +++$+++ 543666 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.164439380E09 +++$+++ No worries - you did the work here, not me! I am in '''awe''' of your citation-fu, especially with the scientific literature - my own 'pet' GA is [[Great Barrier Reef]], and it's not nearly so well cited. In Bacteria, you might also want to link to terms that a non-science reader wouldn't understand, such as \xb5m and morphology. Running it through Word's spell check may also be a good idea - it might pick up some stuff that you've missed. -  +++$+++ ::No worries - you did the work here, not me! I am in '''awe''' of your citation-fu, especially with the scientific literature - my own 'pet' GA is [[Great Barrier Reef]], and it's not nearly so well cited. In Bacteria, you might also want to link to terms that a non-science reader wouldn't understand, such as µm and morphology. Running it through Word's spell check may also be a good idea - it might pick up some stuff that you've missed. - [[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 23:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
543668 +++$+++ Malkinann +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543665 +++$+++ 543667 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.164791700E09 +++$+++ Why does the infobox say Bacterium if the domain is called Bacteria? -  +++$+++ :::Why does the infobox say Bacterium if the domain is called Bacteria? - [[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 01:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

281522 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281522 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-17 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.187388720E09 +++$+++ Hi dk. I'm done with all three tests. I won't know 'til the end of the month if I passed.. and I don't have a strong feeling one way or the other about whether I passed all three... I will be mostly busy in real life (with the exception of a planned &amp; scheduled one-day Wikipedia marathon early next month)  until at least mid-September or maybe even October! But please don't hesitate to drop me a line if something really needs to be done. I will definitely slide it into my schedule. :-) -- +++$+++ Hi dk. I'm done with all three tests. I won't know 'til the end of the month if I passed.. and I don't have a strong feeling one way or the other about whether I passed all three... I will be mostly busy in real life (with the exception of a planned &amp; scheduled one-day Wikipedia marathon early next month)  until at least mid-September or maybe even October! But please don't hesitate to drop me a line if something really needs to be done. I will definitely slide it into my schedule. :-) --[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 15:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
281523 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281522 +++$+++ 281522 +++$+++ 2007-08-18 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.187423280E09 +++$+++ ...uh oh, but PS I dislike the \"sanguo\" image as it appears in the wikiproject template, & vastly prefer the old one. Did I miss the bit where we discussed switching it? :-) -- +++$+++ :...uh oh, but PS I dislike the "sanguo" image as it appears in the wikiproject template, & vastly prefer the old one. Did I miss the bit where we discussed switching it? :-) --[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 00:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
281524 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281522 +++$+++ 281523 +++$+++ 2007-08-18 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.187431080E09 +++$+++ [[WP:BRD|Bold, revert, discuss :)]] Feel free to revert.  +++$+++ ::[[WP:BRD|Bold, revert, discuss :)]] Feel free to revert. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 02:58, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

19381 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-30 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.177996680E09 +++$+++ I would have though so, but I was reverted numerous times on other articles, and its now become a habit. I don't really feel strongly either way, but I need to read up on it to be fair. Thanks for the typo fixes bty; and don't forget to vote on the FAR!  +++$+++ I would have though so, but I was reverted numerous times on other articles, and its now become a habit. I don't really feel strongly either way, but I need to read up on it to be fair. Thanks for the typo fixes bty; and don't forget to vote on the FAR! [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] 22:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
19382 +++$+++ Ceoil +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19381 +++$+++ 19381 +++$+++ 2007-04-30 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.178000640E09 +++$+++ Thanks; no, I made a quick judgment as its late and I need to be up early in the morning. Once again, thanks for the watchful  eye.  +++$+++ :Thanks; no, I made a quick judgment as its late and I need to be up early in the morning. Once again, thanks for the watchful  eye. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] 23:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

543670 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-25 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.164514140E09 +++$+++ I've looked the article over and it's in very nice shape indeed. I've made a few changes (let me know if you are wondering about any of them). I'm not satisfied, though, with the Groups and Identification section; there needs to be more discussion of stains other than Gram stains, and of selective media, and of aerobic and anaerobic culture. These need to be at least mentioned, though I appreciate the need not to put too much detail in the main article. I'll work on it after the current flurry of activity on the article calms down, as I don't want to lose anyone else's changes in edit conflict. - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ I've looked the article over and it's in very nice shape indeed. I've made a few changes (let me know if you are wondering about any of them). I'm not satisfied, though, with the Groups and Identification section; there needs to be more discussion of stains other than Gram stains, and of selective media, and of aerobic and anaerobic culture. These need to be at least mentioned, though I appreciate the need not to put too much detail in the main article. I'll work on it after the current flurry of activity on the article calms down, as I don't want to lose anyone else's changes in edit conflict. - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 20:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
543671 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543670 +++$+++ 543670 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.164514620E09 +++$+++ I'll work on that section later tonight, so don't worry if you want to edit it now. (Also please make sure the spore section reads the way you prefer, I fear I may have accidently not incorporated some of your more recent changes.) - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ :I'll work on that section later tonight, so don't worry if you want to edit it now. (Also please make sure the spore section reads the way you prefer, I fear I may have accidently not incorporated some of your more recent changes.) - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 20:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
543672 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543670 +++$+++ 543671 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.164537480E09 +++$+++ I'm done with it for the moment, feel free to leave feedback or edit mercilessly. I am concerned, though, about an error that keeps creeping back in: <blockquote>Some species, known as opportunistic pathogens, do not usually grow inside a host and cause human disease only in immunosuppressed people. Many species of these bacteria, including Staphylococcus or Pseudomonas species, can cause sepsis, a systemic infection producing shock, massive vasodilation, and death.<\/blockquote>  Neither Staphylococcus nor Pseudomonas are considered opportunistic pathogens, and both cause disease in non-immunosuppressed hosts, though they can have predelictions for specific forms of immunosuppression (Staphylococci for Job's syndrome, pseudomonas for diabetics or those with cystic fibrosis, etc.) - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ ::I'm done with it for the moment, feel free to leave feedback or edit mercilessly. I am concerned, though, about an error that keeps creeping back in: <blockquote>Some species, known as opportunistic pathogens, do not usually grow inside a host and cause human disease only in immunosuppressed people. Many species of these bacteria, including Staphylococcus or Pseudomonas species, can cause sepsis, a systemic infection producing shock, massive vasodilation, and death.</blockquote>  Neither Staphylococcus nor Pseudomonas are considered opportunistic pathogens, and both cause disease in non-immunosuppressed hosts, though they can have predelictions for specific forms of immunosuppression (Staphylococci for Job's syndrome, pseudomonas for diabetics or those with cystic fibrosis, etc.) - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 02:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

281527 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-20 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.187675820E09 +++$+++ I noticed an editor left you a false warning on your talk page. I removed it. (Strange editor; not sure what to make of him.) - +++$+++ I noticed an editor left you a false warning on your talk page. I removed it. (Strange editor; not sure what to make of him.) -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 22:57, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
281528 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281527 +++$+++ 281527 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.187679240E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 23:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

19384 +++$+++ ESkog +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19384 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-04 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.178344680E09 +++$+++ I do, unfortunately, think you're right. However, if automated fair-use rationales come into play, they will likely be insufficient. I think it's unlikely that every article to use a picture of a CD cover really makes any commentary on that cover's design or content. If an image is not itself the subject of any discussion in the article, it's supposed to be removed. We'll cross that bridge when we come to it, I think. ( +++$+++ I do, unfortunately, think you're right. However, if automated fair-use rationales come into play, they will likely be insufficient. I think it's unlikely that every article to use a picture of a CD cover really makes any commentary on that cover's design or content. If an image is not itself the subject of any discussion in the article, it's supposed to be removed. We'll cross that bridge when we come to it, I think. ([[User:ESkog|ESkog]])<sup>([[User talk:ESkog|Talk]])</sup> 22:58, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
19385 +++$+++ ESkog +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19384 +++$+++ 19384 +++$+++ 2007-05-04 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.178345820E09 +++$+++ I haven't seen anything from Jimbo, but there have been a couple of discussions recently about fair-use images on Wikipedia. While they have centered around the removal of screenshots from lists of television episodes, there has also been some discussion about the fair-use rationale and how it has been abused or misused for a while. Obviously, if some clarification came down from them about any of this, we'd follow that over our interpretation of existing fair-use policy pages, but it's not really the Foundation's style to meddle as long as we're getting things mostly right. ( +++$+++ :I haven't seen anything from Jimbo, but there have been a couple of discussions recently about fair-use images on Wikipedia. While they have centered around the removal of screenshots from lists of television episodes, there has also been some discussion about the fair-use rationale and how it has been abused or misused for a while. Obviously, if some clarification came down from them about any of this, we'd follow that over our interpretation of existing fair-use policy pages, but it's not really the Foundation's style to meddle as long as we're getting things mostly right. ([[User:ESkog|ESkog]])<sup>([[User talk:ESkog|Talk]])</sup> 23:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
19386 +++$+++ ESkog +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19384 +++$+++ 19385 +++$+++ 2007-05-04 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.178347200E09 +++$+++ Sorry - I meant to link it but forgot. The discussion I'm referring to is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Removal of images from lists of episodes|here]]. ( +++$+++ ::Sorry - I meant to link it but forgot. The discussion I'm referring to is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Removal of images from lists of episodes|here]]. ([[User:ESkog|ESkog]])<sup>([[User talk:ESkog|Talk]])</sup> 23:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

281529 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281529 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-28 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.188351000E09 +++$+++ Hi _dk, hope all is well with you! Just dropped by to share some '''[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Ling.Nut&diff=154211633&oldid=154209484 good news]''' --  +++$+++ Hi _dk, hope all is well with you! Just dropped by to share some '''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ling.Nut&diff=154211633&oldid=154209484 good news]''' -- [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 18:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
281530 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281529 +++$+++ 281529 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.188366240E09 +++$+++ Wow, congratulations!  +++$+++ :Wow, congratulations! [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 22:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

281531 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-03 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.188863340E09 +++$+++ [[Valley of the Fallen Phoenix]] was named after [[Pang Tong]] sometime after he died, contradictory to popular belief, it is not ironic at all. -- +++$+++ [[Valley of the Fallen Phoenix]] was named after [[Pang Tong]] sometime after he died, contradictory to popular belief, it is not ironic at all. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 16:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
281532 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281531 +++$+++ 281531 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.188880620E09 +++$+++ The name of the place is only given in the novel, so it's fiction to begin with. When Pang Tong came to the place (in the novel), he took notice of its name and thought it was a bad omen. And surely, he died there soon after. If there is such a place called Valley of the Fallen Phoenix in real life, it must have been named after the novel which would be irrelevant to the historical Pang Tong.  +++$+++ :The name of the place is only given in the novel, so it's fiction to begin with. When Pang Tong came to the place (in the novel), he took notice of its name and thought it was a bad omen. And surely, he died there soon after. If there is such a place called Valley of the Fallen Phoenix in real life, it must have been named after the novel which would be irrelevant to the historical Pang Tong. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 21:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
281533 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281531 +++$+++ 281532 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.188887880E09 +++$+++ Yeah its a real place because i went there when i visited China. Whether it was named for the novel i don't know, but it definitely was named after the Three Kingdoms. -- +++$+++ ::Yeah its a real place because i went there when i visited China. Whether it was named for the novel i don't know, but it definitely was named after the Three Kingdoms. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 23:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
281534 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281531 +++$+++ 281533 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.188896640E09 +++$+++ Note: now that i think about it it might just have been called the Valley of the Phoenix when translated, but still it was just some like shrine-like gift shop thing. So you are probably right. -- +++$+++ :::Note: now that i think about it it might just have been called the Valley of the Phoenix when translated, but still it was just some like shrine-like gift shop thing. So you are probably right. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] 02:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

543676 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-26 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164587640E09 +++$+++ Tim, I'm not sure if you've noticed but {{user|Richard001}} raised an issue on the [[Talk:Enzyme|Enzyme talk page]] regarding a graph in the Thermodynamics section of the article. As you are a \"maintainer\" of [[Enzyme]] I'd appreciate your input on this \u2014 it would only take me a couple of minutes to amend the graph, if necessary. (feel free to reply on Enzyme talk) Thanks,  +++$+++ Tim, I'm not sure if you've noticed but {{user|Richard001}} raised an issue on the [[Talk:Enzyme|Enzyme talk page]] regarding a graph in the Thermodynamics section of the article. As you are a "maintainer" of [[Enzyme]] I'd appreciate your input on this — it would only take me a couple of minutes to amend the graph, if necessary. (feel free to reply on Enzyme talk) Thanks, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 16:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
543677 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543676 +++$+++ 543676 +++$+++ 2006-11-26 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.164596700E09 +++$+++ Right \u2014 I went ahead and changed it a bit. New version at [[Talk:Enzyme]], comments welcome (I know you're busy with [[Bacteria]]. Sorry for the bother.)  +++$+++ :Right — I went ahead and changed it a bit. New version at [[Talk:Enzyme]], comments welcome (I know you're busy with [[Bacteria]]. Sorry for the bother.) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 19:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

543678 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-27 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.164665820E09 +++$+++ Firstly, thank you for the kind words, I'm glad I could help. Secondly, I'm working on Relative_scale.svg as I type this. It may take a while as I'm having some minor hardware trouble, but rest assured your request <s>will be granted<\/s> :) Thanks again,  +++$+++ Firstly, thank you for the kind words, I'm glad I could help. Secondly, I'm working on Relative_scale.svg as I type this. It may take a while as I'm having some minor hardware trouble, but rest assured your request <s>will be granted</s> :) Thanks again, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 14:17, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
543679 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543678 +++$+++ 543678 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.164670260E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Relative scale.svg|Granted]]. Hope it looks good.  +++$+++ :[[:Image:Relative scale.svg|Granted]]. Hope it looks good. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 15:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

281536 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281536 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-09 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.189375260E09 +++$+++ ...moving to Taiwan this week. Will try to get back involved in WP:3K late this month or early next. later! -- +++$+++ ...moving to Taiwan this week. Will try to get back involved in WP:3K late this month or early next. later! --[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 15:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
281537 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281536 +++$+++ 281536 +++$+++ 2007-09-09 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.189400160E09 +++$+++ Hope you enjoy the place! (Try not to read\/watch their news though, they would degrade your intelligence.)  +++$+++ :Hope you enjoy the place! (Try not to read/watch their news though, they would degrade your intelligence.) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 21:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

19393 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-29 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.180507260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply (you win the prize for being first to react!).  I can't recall seeing discussion of the appropriateness or otherwise of comparable categories created by a WikiProject - the occasional daft category tree (or \"pillar\", perhaps) created by an individual, yes - but you may well be right that the issue has come up before.  My \"off the cuff\" reaction is to say that it probably depends on context - I'm not trying to rewrite the entire categorization principles of Wikipedia, only this little bit of it.  But it'll be interesting to see whether other contributors say \"this level of category is a bad idea generally\/in some cases, see XYZ\" or something like that.  Yours,  +++$+++ Thanks for your reply (you win the prize for being first to react!).  I can't recall seeing discussion of the appropriateness or otherwise of comparable categories created by a WikiProject - the occasional daft category tree (or "pillar", perhaps) created by an individual, yes - but you may well be right that the issue has come up before.  My "off the cuff" reaction is to say that it probably depends on context - I'm not trying to rewrite the entire categorization principles of Wikipedia, only this little bit of it.  But it'll be interesting to see whether other contributors say "this level of category is a bad idea generally/in some cases, see XYZ" or something like that.  Yours, [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]] 23:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
19394 +++$+++ Bencherlite +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19393 +++$+++ 19393 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.180508100E09 +++$+++ Interesting reading - I must have seen it at the time, as I contributed to a discussion elsewhere on the page, but it hadn't stuck in my mind.  I notice that [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] said that he didn't want the result used as a precedent, which would suggest that there is nothing written in stone at present - as it happens, I've left a message for him about this discussion as he and I have had some dealings on music-related category discussions in the past and I thought he might be interested.  Thanks for the reference.   +++$+++ :Interesting reading - I must have seen it at the time, as I contributed to a discussion elsewhere on the page, but it hadn't stuck in my mind.  I notice that [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] said that he didn't want the result used as a precedent, which would suggest that there is nothing written in stone at present - as it happens, I've left a message for him about this discussion as he and I have had some dealings on music-related category discussions in the past and I thought he might be interested.  Thanks for the reference.  [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]] 23:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

281538 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-12 08:35:00 +++$+++ 1.189611300E09 +++$+++ Thought I'd log in and have a look around, see if Wikipedia had blown up without me here to help.  Looks like it hasn't... yet :)  +++$+++ Thought I'd log in and have a look around, see if Wikipedia had blown up without me here to help.  Looks like it hasn't... yet :) [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 08:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
281539 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281538 +++$+++ 281538 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.189611780E09 +++$+++ I hadn't been up to much (in Wikipedia) since you left, for some reason. So except for reverting various idiocies in our Wikiproject, everything's fine for me here :)  +++$+++ :I hadn't been up to much (in Wikipedia) since you left, for some reason. So except for reverting various idiocies in our Wikiproject, everything's fine for me here :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 08:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
281540 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281538 +++$+++ 281539 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.189612260E09 +++$+++ Thought you'd be crushed under the weight, but it's good to hear it's been smooth sailing.  I'd intended to start editing again in a week or two, but I just got a job with a logistics company which has me going 12 hours a day, 6 days a week for the entire forseeable future.  Great money but no time\/life\/whatever.  To be honest, spending the only 2 or so hours of personal time I'm getting doing more stuff on Wiki is not so appealing.  I've asked for night work, which would be only 8 hours\/six days, and that would certainly be better.  +++$+++ ::Thought you'd be crushed under the weight, but it's good to hear it's been smooth sailing.  I'd intended to start editing again in a week or two, but I just got a job with a logistics company which has me going 12 hours a day, 6 days a week for the entire forseeable future.  Great money but no time/life/whatever.  To be honest, spending the only 2 or so hours of personal time I'm getting doing more stuff on Wiki is not so appealing.  I've asked for night work, which would be only 8 hours/six days, and that would certainly be better. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 08:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
281541 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281538 +++$+++ 281540 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.189616220E09 +++$+++ I can understand that, cause Wikipedia can be stressful and I'm starting to lose interest in editing as well...(I've got university work and stuff). I certainly hope you can come back to editing soon, but more important is that you do what is best for you. So don't sweat it and good luck on your job :)  +++$+++ :::I can understand that, cause Wikipedia can be stressful and I'm starting to lose interest in editing as well...(I've got university work and stuff). I certainly hope you can come back to editing soon, but more important is that you do what is best for you. So don't sweat it and good luck on your job :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 09:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

19396 +++$+++ Kaini +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19396 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-11 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.184196420E09 +++$+++ wow, i never realised there was such an amount of reading material available on the novel... proper critical analyses are few and far between online. gotta check these out. unless of course you're 'doing a danielewski' and providing a load of nonexistent references ;) just kidding -- +++$+++ wow, i never realised there was such an amount of reading material available on the novel... proper critical analyses are few and far between online. gotta check these out. unless of course you're 'doing a danielewski' and providing a load of nonexistent references ;) just kidding --[[User:Kaini|Kaini]] 16:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
19397 +++$+++ Kaini +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19396 +++$+++ 19396 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.184202840E09 +++$+++ unfortunately, not any more. a friend might, though, i will look into it. -- +++$+++ :unfortunately, not any more. a friend might, though, i will look into it. --[[User:Kaini|Kaini]] 18:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

19398 +++$+++ Parsifal +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.187587740E09 +++$+++ The articles can certainly be improved with references, but they should still exist.  The only way to deal with tendentious editing is for multiple editors to help with reversions.   He's been watching everything I do, and he'll see your comment on the talk page, so don't be surprised if you get some strange messages from him on your talk page.  Please do check the history of those pages and revert the vandalism of both page moves and content when you have a chance, that would be very helpful.    Best Wishes -- +++$+++ The articles can certainly be improved with references, but they should still exist.  The only way to deal with tendentious editing is for multiple editors to help with reversions.   He's been watching everything I do, and he'll see your comment on the talk page, so don't be surprised if you get some strange messages from him on your talk page.  Please do check the history of those pages and revert the vandalism of both page moves and content when you have a chance, that would be very helpful.    Best Wishes --[[User:Parsifal|Parsifal]] [[User talk:Parsifal|<sub>Hello</sub>]] 22:29, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
19399 +++$+++ Susume-eat +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19398 +++$+++ 19398 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.187589120E09 +++$+++ Hello Unint. I have caused no vandalism. This man tried to accuse me of vandalism, the case was thrown out quickly spinning. We have a communication problem, I am very happy be friends and work improve wikipedia, please all calling me vandalism really hurts my feelings, I worked very hard yesterday, all day long, 24 hour. Unint, I am happy to discuss with you, I hope we can agree some misunderstandings, now progress from the current edit, anyone can edit wikipedia, be bold, no revert good faith ^-^ ok i feel sad and depressed and frustrated when you call me vandal becaue i really worked hard as ^-^ -- +++$+++ : Hello Unint. I have caused no vandalism. This man tried to accuse me of vandalism, the case was thrown out quickly spinning. We have a communication problem, I am very happy be friends and work improve wikipedia, please all calling me vandalism really hurts my feelings, I worked very hard yesterday, all day long, 24 hour. Unint, I am happy to discuss with you, I hope we can agree some misunderstandings, now progress from the current edit, anyone can edit wikipedia, be bold, no revert good faith ^-^ ok i feel sad and depressed and frustrated when you call me vandal becaue i really worked hard as ^-^ --[[User:Susume-eat|Susume-eat]] 22:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

19400 +++$+++ Parsifal +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.187591400E09 +++$+++ You have produced zero references to support what you're doing. I am sure that Unint will through your disingenous note.  -- +++$+++ You have produced zero references to support what you're doing. I am sure that Unint will through your disingenous note.  --[[User:Parsifal|Parsifal]] [[User talk:Parsifal|<sub>Hello</sub>]] 23:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
19401 +++$+++ Susume-eat +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19400 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.187592060E09 +++$+++ Parsifal please I beg you please stop making personal attacks against my name, it is very hurtful, it is depressing also, makes me feel sad, and also the comment is very \"out of context\", it makes me look awful when really I worked very hard and there is a lot of discussion there. How can I defend to myself, I feel like crying , I really worked so much of yesterday, 24 hours :-( -- +++$+++ :::Parsifal please I beg you please stop making personal attacks against my name, it is very hurtful, it is depressing also, makes me feel sad, and also the comment is very "out of context", it makes me look awful when really I worked very hard and there is a lot of discussion there. How can I defend to myself, I feel like crying , I really worked so much of yesterday, 24 hours :-( --[[User:Susume-eat|Susume-eat]] 23:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
19402 +++$+++ Parsifal +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19400 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.187593140E09 +++$+++ If you do positive work and collaborate instead of ignoring and making fun of people, then your hard work will be recognized and appreciated, even by me.   So you don't need to defend yourself, all you need to do is start working with people instead of against them.  That will solve all problems.  -- +++$+++ ::::If you do positive work and collaborate instead of ignoring and making fun of people, then your hard work will be recognized and appreciated, even by me.   So you don't need to defend yourself, all you need to do is start working with people instead of against them.  That will solve all problems.  --[[User:Parsifal|Parsifal]] [[User talk:Parsifal|<sub>Hello</sub>]] 23:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

19404 +++$+++ Parsifal +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-04 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.188901080E09 +++$+++ Hi ...  If you have a chance, would you take a look at this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Electronic_music_%28art%29#article_intro_makes_no_sense talk page section] and article history of the page that used to be titled [[Electronic art music]]?  Thanks -- +++$+++ Hi ...  If you have a chance, would you take a look at this [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Electronic_music_%28art%29#article_intro_makes_no_sense talk page section] and article history of the page that used to be titled [[Electronic art music]]?  Thanks --[[User:Parsifal|Parsifal]] [[User talk:Parsifal|<sub>Hello</sub>]] 03:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
19405 +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ Unint +++$+++ 19404 +++$+++ 19404 +++$+++ 2007-10-18 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.192692720E09 +++$+++ Any pointers? \u2013 +++$+++ :Any pointers? –[[User:Unint|Unint]] 00:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

543693 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543693 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-28 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.164776340E09 +++$+++ Pretty good, but I'd like to see sources for the first paragraph of intellectular structures, the second paragraph of Extracellular structures, first paragraph of Metabolism, and the second paragraph of Growth and reproduction.  +++$+++ Pretty good, but I'd like to see sources for the first paragraph of intellectular structures, the second paragraph of Extracellular structures, first paragraph of Metabolism, and the second paragraph of Growth and reproduction. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 20:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
543694 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543693 +++$+++ 543693 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.164788640E09 +++$+++ Cool, I'm convinced.  +++$+++ :Cool, I'm convinced. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 00:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

281550 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-08 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.194591420E09 +++$+++ God, it's not even out yet and it looks like every article's being hit on at least a daily basis.  I'm thinking maybe I should remove all information pertaining to any single release altogether and have a single universal description for each character.  That way we can filter out any info related to any one release and prevent any more speculation or bad images being uploaded every time each character gets an image overhaul.  What do you think?  +++$+++ God, it's not even out yet and it looks like every article's being hit on at least a daily basis.  I'm thinking maybe I should remove all information pertaining to any single release altogether and have a single universal description for each character.  That way we can filter out any info related to any one release and prevent any more speculation or bad images being uploaded every time each character gets an image overhaul.  What do you think? [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 22:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
281551 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281550 +++$+++ 281550 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.194593040E09 +++$+++ That's a good idea in theory, but the gap between DW5 and 6 is too big with the design overhauls and stuff. How will there be a universal description? Also, I think the biographical articles should only contain a brief description on DW while the details should go to the [[List of Dynasty Warriors characters]].  +++$+++ :That's a good idea in theory, but the gap between DW5 and 6 is too big with the design overhauls and stuff. How will there be a universal description? Also, I think the biographical articles should only contain a brief description on DW while the details should go to the [[List of Dynasty Warriors characters]]. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 23:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
281552 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281550 +++$+++ 281551 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.194593460E09 +++$+++ I'd like only the brief description and no characters page at all, since they only attract wave after wave of cruft and spec.  I'm not sure the gap between games is anything more than superficial.  Appearances have changed in every game, and just because they've changed more in the next release doesn't make it a particularly notable fact.  +++$+++ ::I'd like only the brief description and no characters page at all, since they only attract wave after wave of cruft and spec.  I'm not sure the gap between games is anything more than superficial.  Appearances have changed in every game, and just because they've changed more in the next release doesn't make it a particularly notable fact. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 23:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
281553 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281550 +++$+++ 281552 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.194596100E09 +++$+++ I just don't like having such a big section devoted to a series of video games on articles about historical people, so I think it'd be better to ship them off somewhere. Keep them all in one place and maintain it rather than have them plague every article in this project, I say. Dw6 isn't out yet, it might be too early to say anything universal about its characters.  +++$+++ :::I just don't like having such a big section devoted to a series of video games on articles about historical people, so I think it'd be better to ship them off somewhere. Keep them all in one place and maintain it rather than have them plague every article in this project, I say. Dw6 isn't out yet, it might be too early to say anything universal about its characters. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 00:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
281554 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281550 +++$+++ 281553 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.194597240E09 +++$+++ I'll trim the sections right down, because I agree that they're probably too big... and getting bigger.  If you want a stand alone characters article, it's gonna be your train wreck.  There's no way I'm monitoring an article virtually assured to be the cruft capital of Wikipedia. I just haven't got the time or the patience anymore.  +++$+++ ::::I'll trim the sections right down, because I agree that they're probably too big... and getting bigger.  If you want a stand alone characters article, it's gonna be your train wreck.  There's no way I'm monitoring an article virtually assured to be the cruft capital of Wikipedia. I just haven't got the time or the patience anymore. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 00:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

571213 +++$+++ AndonicO +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-18 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.163918460E09 +++$+++ I'll add a link of the brick film to my userpage soon. | [[User:AndonicO|<font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\">'''A'''<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"DarkSlateGray\">ndonic<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"2\">'''O'''<\/font>]] <sup><small><font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"MidnightBlue\">[[User talk:AndonicO|''Talk'']]<\/font> | <font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"MidnightBlue\"> +++$+++ I'll add a link of the brick film to my userpage soon. | [[User:AndonicO|<font face="Papyrus" color="Black">'''A'''</font><font face="Papyrus" color="DarkSlateGray">ndonic</font><font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="2">'''O'''</font>]] <sup><small><font face="Times New Roman" color="MidnightBlue">[[User talk:AndonicO|''Talk'']]</font> | <font face="Times New Roman" color="MidnightBlue">[[User:AndonicO/My Autograph Book|''Sign Here'']]</font></small></sup> 22:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
571214 +++$+++ AndonicO +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571213 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.163918640E09 +++$+++ In any case, I recommend [[Wikipedia:Picture peer review|picture peer review]] first. | [[User:AndonicO|<font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\">'''A'''<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"DarkSlateGray\">ndonic<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"2\">'''O'''<\/font>]] <sup><small><font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"MidnightBlue\">[[User talk:AndonicO|''Talk'']]<\/font> | <font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"MidnightBlue\"> +++$+++ :::::::In any case, I recommend [[Wikipedia:Picture peer review|picture peer review]] first. | [[User:AndonicO|<font face="Papyrus" color="Black">'''A'''</font><font face="Papyrus" color="DarkSlateGray">ndonic</font><font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="2">'''O'''</font>]] <sup><small><font face="Times New Roman" color="MidnightBlue">[[User talk:AndonicO|''Talk'']]</font> | <font face="Times New Roman" color="MidnightBlue">[[User:AndonicO/My Autograph Book|''Sign Here'']]</font></small></sup> 22:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
571215 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571213 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.163919660E09 +++$+++ Yeah, your probably right. I was just on the page looking, a [[Wikipedia:Picture peer review|picture peer review]] sounds really good first. Lucky for me you have had experience in Featured picture department, it looks really hard to get one through. I can't believe the F-22 Raptor didn't get in! That's an Amazing shot. I have 85 or so images, in [[User:Dfrg.msc\/Gallery|My gallery]] of which I think [[:Image:NamadgiRock.jpg]] and [[:Image:DFRLego 003.jpg]] are the best, perhaps this as well: [[:Image:Henri Le Secq near a Gargoyle.jpg]]. But, I'm not sure. Take a look for your self. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::::::::Yeah, your probably right. I was just on the page looking, a [[Wikipedia:Picture peer review|picture peer review]] sounds really good first. Lucky for me you have had experience in Featured picture department, it looks really hard to get one through. I can't believe the F-22 Raptor didn't get in! That's an Amazing shot. I have 85 or so images, in [[User:Dfrg.msc/Gallery|My gallery]] of which I think [[:Image:NamadgiRock.jpg]] and [[:Image:DFRLego 003.jpg]] are the best, perhaps this as well: [[:Image:Henri Le Secq near a Gargoyle.jpg]]. But, I'm not sure. Take a look for your self. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[ User:Dfrg.msc/FAQ|2]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|3]]</sup></small> 23:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
571216 +++$+++ AndonicO +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571213 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.163921460E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates\/USAF F\/A-22|Here's]] why the Raptor didn't get promoted, in case you're interested. I actually that the best one is the nest (for FP). You might want to give it a good cropping (make sure it stays above 1000px though), and put it on PPR also. | [[User:AndonicO|<font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\">'''A'''<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"DarkSlateGray\">ndonic<\/font><font face=\"Papyrus\" color=\"Black\" size=\"2\">'''O'''<\/font>]] <sup><small><font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"MidnightBlue\">[[User talk:AndonicO|''Talk'']]<\/font> | <font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"MidnightBlue\"> +++$+++ :::::::::[[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/USAF F/A-22|Here's]] why the Raptor didn't get promoted, in case you're interested. I actually that the best one is the nest (for FP). You might want to give it a good cropping (make sure it stays above 1000px though), and put it on PPR also. | [[User:AndonicO|<font face="Papyrus" color="Black">'''A'''</font><font face="Papyrus" color="DarkSlateGray">ndonic</font><font face="Papyrus" color="Black" size="2">'''O'''</font>]] <sup><small><font face="Times New Roman" color="MidnightBlue">[[User talk:AndonicO|''Talk'']]</font> | <font face="Times New Roman" color="MidnightBlue">[[User:AndonicO/My Autograph Book|''Sign Here'']]</font></small></sup> 23:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

611679 +++$+++ SUIT +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-19 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.163987880E09 +++$+++ P.S. I need some help with the Vegetto article, people keep switching the names around to Vegerot. I don't mean move the page or anything, I just need some help switching all the Vegerots back to Vegetto. Well, so long, pal.--<font face=\"comic sans ms\"> +++$+++ P.S. I need some help with the Vegetto article, people keep switching the names around to Vegerot. I don't mean move the page or anything, I just need some help switching all the Vegerots back to Vegetto. Well, so long, pal.--<font face="comic sans ms">[[User:SUIT|<font color="gold">'''SU'''</font><font color="silver">'''IT'''</font>]]</font>17:58, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
611680 +++$+++ SUIT +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611679 +++$+++ 611679 +++$+++ 2006-11-19 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.163988840E09 +++$+++ Disrregard the above Vegetto message.--<font face=\"comic sans ms\"> +++$+++ :Disrregard the above Vegetto message.--<font face="comic sans ms">[[User:SUIT|<font color="gold">'''SU'''</font><font color="silver">'''IT'''</font>]]</font> 18:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
611681 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611679 +++$+++ 611680 +++$+++ 2006-11-19 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.163992140E09 +++$+++ I'll put it on my watchlist, just in case. And about your editor review, I had about two paragraphs written this morning until my sister got on and closed everything out. I'll rewrite it when I get the chance. \/\/  +++$+++ ::I'll put it on my watchlist, just in case. And about your editor review, I had about two paragraphs written this morning until my sister got on and closed everything out. I'll rewrite it when I get the chance. // [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuke'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sasuke-kun27|<font color="purple">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 19:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

281555 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281555 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-09 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.194597720E09 +++$+++ ''Their'' train wreck, you mean. But looking at the list at this stage, it isn't so bad. If we want to be more well-rounded with the  popular culture stuff, the modern references section is going to get humongous and there is no way we can have a full paragraph on Dynasty Warriors alone. And DW is only a small part of the fandom (I cringe to use this word) in the countries that care about the Three Kingdoms.  +++$+++ ''Their'' train wreck, you mean. But looking at the list at this stage, it isn't so bad. If we want to be more well-rounded with the  popular culture stuff, the modern references section is going to get humongous and there is no way we can have a full paragraph on Dynasty Warriors alone. And DW is only a small part of the fandom (I cringe to use this word) in the countries that care about the Three Kingdoms. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 00:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
281556 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281555 +++$+++ 281555 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.194967500E09 +++$+++ Have any of these characters been confirmed as not being in DW6? I'm seeing a lot of edits by some guy stating that about half a dozen characters aren't in the game.  +++$+++ :Have any of these characters been confirmed as not being in DW6? I'm seeing a lot of edits by some guy stating that about half a dozen characters aren't in the game. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 07:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
281557 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281555 +++$+++ 281556 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.194971880E09 +++$+++ It's hard to confirm if something is absence, but that seems to be the case judging by the videos on the internet. The game is out, btw.  +++$+++ ::It's hard to confirm if something is absence, but that seems to be the case judging by the videos on the internet. The game is out, btw. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] 08:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
281558 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281555 +++$+++ 281557 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 08:45:00 +++$+++ 1.194972300E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure whether or not it would be appropriate to allow something that is still quite debatable stand, though, regardless of how likely it is.  +++$+++ :::I'm not sure whether or not it would be appropriate to allow something that is still quite debatable stand, though, regardless of how likely it is. [[User:Gamer Junkie|Gamer Junkie]] 08:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

543702 +++$+++ ClockworkSoul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-03 05:21:00 +++$+++ 1.165152060E09 +++$+++ Congrats on another winner! &ndash;  +++$+++ Congrats on another winner! &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 05:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
543703 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543702 +++$+++ 543702 +++$+++ 2006-12-03 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.165181040E09 +++$+++ Second that \u2014 next, please! (Argh, I shouldn't have been offline yesterday... wish I could have been the first to congratulate you :)  +++$+++ :Second that — next, please! (Argh, I shouldn't have been offline yesterday... wish I could have been the first to congratulate you :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 13:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

90617 +++$+++ Str1977 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90617 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-15 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.224124200E09 +++$+++ Care for an AfD on this article?  +++$+++ Care for an AfD on this article? [[User:Str1977|Str1977]] [[User talk:Str1977|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 19:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
90618 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90617 +++$+++ 90617 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.224126300E09 +++$+++ I think that there  might be some good content in that article so I do not favor an AfD there. I would like to see some sort of cleanup and possibly a retitling, and maybe a merger with [[Religion in Czechoslovakia (1948-1989)]] and the religion sections of [[Czech Republic]] and [[Slovakia]].--[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] |  +++$+++ :I think that there  might be some good content in that article so I do not favor an AfD there. I would like to see some sort of cleanup and possibly a retitling, and maybe a merger with [[Religion in Czechoslovakia (1948-1989)]] and the religion sections of [[Czech Republic]] and [[Slovakia]].--[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll#top|talk]] | [[User:Filll/WP Challenge|<font color="Green"><small>wpc</small></font>]]) 20:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
90619 +++$+++ Str1977 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90617 +++$+++ 90618 +++$+++ 2008-10-16 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.224196380E09 +++$+++ But isn't the title already completely flawed?  +++$+++ ::But isn't the title already completely flawed? [[User:Str1977|Str1977]] [[User talk:Str1977|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 15:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

543704 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-03 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.165191540E09 +++$+++ Thank you, but the credit isn't mine, it was a lot of hard work from a lot of people, especially the reviewers!  +++$+++ Thank you, but the credit isn't mine, it was a lot of hard work from a lot of people, especially the reviewers! [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 16:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
543705 +++$+++ NCurse +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543704 +++$+++ 543704 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.165415340E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim! I'm sorry for not giving any comments, feedbacks on the bacteria FAC, I've been recently busy in the university. Hope I can help next time, BTW congrats for your other FA. :)  +++$+++ :Hi Tim! I'm sorry for not giving any comments, feedbacks on the bacteria FAC, I've been recently busy in the university. Hope I can help next time, BTW congrats for your other FA. :) [[User:NCurse|NCurs]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]] <sub> [[User talk:NCurse|work]]</sub> 06:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

281561 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-19 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.195463400E09 +++$+++ ..of Red Cliffs.. Which is now FA. :-) Would you do the honors? I'm supposed to be busy.. thanks! -- +++$+++ ..of Red Cliffs.. Which is now FA. :-) Would you do the honors? I'm supposed to be busy.. thanks! --[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 01:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
281562 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281561 +++$+++ 281561 +++$+++ 2007-11-19 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.195469040E09 +++$+++ I...don't...know...Wade-Giles.....;_;  +++$+++ :I...don't...know...Wade-Giles.....;_; [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk|talk]]) 02:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
281563 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281561 +++$+++ 281561 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.195547520E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ * [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 00:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
281564 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281561 +++$+++ 281561 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.195547760E09 +++$+++ I borrowed the book from my library (and is constantly renewing it), so I'm a happy man. :D I gather that the Guan Yu article is near complete in terms of content, and only the citations need work. The religious aspect of him, though, aaaaaaaaaaaaaccck.  +++$+++ :I borrowed the book from my library (and is constantly renewing it), so I'm a happy man. :D I gather that the Guan Yu article is near complete in terms of content, and only the citations need work. The religious aspect of him, though, aaaaaaaaaaaaaccck. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk|talk]]) 00:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
281565 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281561 +++$+++ 281564 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.195548060E09 +++$+++ Just tread cautiously on the religious stuff. Keep it to the bare minimum of absolutely, ironclad, verifible facts. Don't wanna irritate anyone. :-)  +++$+++ ::Just tread cautiously on the religious stuff. Keep it to the bare minimum of absolutely, ironclad, verifible facts. Don't wanna irritate anyone. :-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 00:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
281566 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281561 +++$+++ 281565 +++$+++ 2007-11-20 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.195548900E09 +++$+++ I have no background knowledge in this regard, so it's difficult for me here...  +++$+++ :::I have no background knowledge in this regard, so it's difficult for me here... [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk|talk]]) 00:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

559305 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ 559305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-11 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.147388280E09 +++$+++ Joel, please take a look at my speech:[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Marine_69-71\/Sandbox speech].  Tell me if there is anything that I might have left out.   +++$+++ Joel, please take a look at my speech:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Marine_69-71/Sandbox speech].  Tell me if there is anything that I might have left out.  [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 15:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
559306 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ 559305 +++$+++ 559305 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.147390980E09 +++$+++ Will you accept my nomination?  +++$+++ *Will you accept my nomination? [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] 16:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
559307 +++$+++ Guettarda +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ 559305 +++$+++ 559305 +++$+++ 2006-05-11 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.147393140E09 +++$+++ If you ''do'' accept, make it soon - I'm only around until Saturday, then it's off to spend 2 weeks in the southern Appalachians (yay!); I wouldn't want to miss my chance to vote <s>against<\/s> for you.  +++$+++ *If you ''do'' accept, make it soon - I'm only around until Saturday, then it's off to spend 2 weeks in the southern Appalachians (yay!); I wouldn't want to miss my chance to vote <s>against</s> for you. [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] 17:19, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

543708 +++$+++ David D. +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.165931940E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AEnzyme_inhibitor&diff=93731270&oldid=85200635 Watch out].  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AEnzyme_inhibitor&diff=93731270&oldid=85200635 Watch out]. [[User:David D.|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.|(Talk)]] 05:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
543709 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543708 +++$+++ 543708 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.165978860E09 +++$+++ Tim, are you aware of what's been going on all week on the main page featured articles?  I was working against the vandals when Down syndrome was up, and it's bad - they attack the templates and images that are used in the article, so that it's harder to find and revert the vandalism.  There has now been a suggestion that templates and images should be protected before going to the main page, but admins are still debating.  You might want to get up on that discussion - which is all over the place - before the 15th.  Some of it has been happening at ANI,[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/IncidentArchive152#Main_page_protection_policy] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#Today.27s_featured_article] have a look at the talk page of [[Down syndrome]], some is at [[Wikipedia talk:Main page]], and some is at [[Wikipedia talk:Main Page featured article protection]].  {{user|tariqabjotu}} or {{user|Samsara}} may be helpful in getting templates and images protected before you go to the main page.  +++$+++ :Tim, are you aware of what's been going on all week on the main page featured articles?  I was working against the vandals when Down syndrome was up, and it's bad - they attack the templates and images that are used in the article, so that it's harder to find and revert the vandalism.  There has now been a suggestion that templates and images should be protected before going to the main page, but admins are still debating.  You might want to get up on that discussion - which is all over the place - before the 15th.  Some of it has been happening at ANI,[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive152#Main_page_protection_policy] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Today.27s_featured_article] have a look at the talk page of [[Down syndrome]], some is at [[Wikipedia talk:Main page]], and some is at [[Wikipedia talk:Main Page featured article protection]].  {{user|tariqabjotu}} or {{user|Samsara}} may be helpful in getting templates and images protected before you go to the main page. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
543710 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543708 +++$+++ 543709 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.166147340E09 +++$+++ Just a note to make sure you check in on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Samsara#Main-page_FA_for_Enzyme_inhibitor discussion on Samsara's page.]  +++$+++ ::Just a note to make sure you check in on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Samsara#Main-page_FA_for_Enzyme_inhibitor discussion on Samsara's page.] [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

527525 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527525 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-25 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.174874880E09 +++$+++ '''Beat the 'crat''' congrats...!   +++$+++ '''Beat the 'crat''' congrats...!  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] 19:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
527526 +++$+++ Nichalp +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527525 +++$+++ 527525 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.174875000E09 +++$+++ Hmmmph  +++$+++ :Hmmmph [[user:Nichalp|<font color="#0082B8">=Nichalp</font>]] [[User Talk:Nichalp|<font color="#0082B8">«Talk»=</font>]] 19:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
527527 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527525 +++$+++ 527526 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.174875240E09 +++$+++ Sorry Nichalp, couldn't resist!!!  +++$+++ ::Sorry Nichalp, couldn't resist!!! [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] 19:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

281568 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-29 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.196344500E09 +++$+++ How should I go about this? Remove everything on the list and replace it with the article info, rewrite what's already there or what? I'm asking you because I think you're the only person who pays any attention to the character article and would know if any part of it is worth sparing or not. I don't know about things like \"notable battles\". There's no specific universal set for each character in every game. I'm also not sure about the weapons, since some of them have changed since the series' first outing.  +++$+++ How should I go about this? Remove everything on the list and replace it with the article info, rewrite what's already there or what? I'm asking you because I think you're the only person who pays any attention to the character article and would know if any part of it is worth sparing or not. I don't know about things like "notable battles". There's no specific universal set for each character in every game. I'm also not sure about the weapons, since some of them have changed since the series' first outing. [[User:Gamer Junkie|<font face="Papyrus" color="teal">'''Gamer Junkie'''</font>]] 05:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
281569 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281568 +++$+++ 281568 +++$+++ 2007-11-29 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.196350980E09 +++$+++ Probably a merge of what's already there and what's on the biographical articles now, but this will have to be done on a case by case basis. The notable battles are really subjective (except Dian Wei with the Battle of Wan Castle, Guan Yu with Guan Yu's Escape, etc), so unless there is a clearly defined criteria, the notable battles part is going to be hard to control. I think the most significant change in weaponry is from 5 to 6, so there's nothing wrong with listing both...I always don't see the point of including ultimate weapons though, but that's just me. I think I'll go in there first and remove some of the inadequate things there, to make your job easier.  +++$+++ :Probably a merge of what's already there and what's on the biographical articles now, but this will have to be done on a case by case basis. The notable battles are really subjective (except Dian Wei with the Battle of Wan Castle, Guan Yu with Guan Yu's Escape, etc), so unless there is a clearly defined criteria, the notable battles part is going to be hard to control. I think the most significant change in weaponry is from 5 to 6, so there's nothing wrong with listing both...I always don't see the point of including ultimate weapons though, but that's just me. I think I'll go in there first and remove some of the inadequate things there, to make your job easier. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk|talk]]) 07:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
281570 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281568 +++$+++ 281569 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.196437380E09 +++$+++ Appreciated. Let's not simply merge everything, the article will be ridiculously gigantic. I agree that the Battle of Wan Castle for Dian Wei, Battle of Tong Gate for Ma Chao, etc, should probably remain. I've unfortunately been involved in an AfD squabble with a persistently obnoxious member who is currently trying to delete pretty much every Resident Evil article on Wikipedia. Once I'm done, I'll be back on this, but I can't let this guy get his nominations through since these guys always have a dozen more of their deletionist buddies on hand to pass an AfD before anybody else even notices. The things we have to do...  +++$+++ ::Appreciated. Let's not simply merge everything, the article will be ridiculously gigantic. I agree that the Battle of Wan Castle for Dian Wei, Battle of Tong Gate for Ma Chao, etc, should probably remain. I've unfortunately been involved in an AfD squabble with a persistently obnoxious member who is currently trying to delete pretty much every Resident Evil article on Wikipedia. Once I'm done, I'll be back on this, but I can't let this guy get his nominations through since these guys always have a dozen more of their deletionist buddies on hand to pass an AfD before anybody else even notices. The things we have to do... [[User:Gamer Junkie|<font face="Papyrus" color="teal">'''Gamer Junkie'''</font>]] 07:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

281571 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.196947080E09 +++$+++ Hi, I see you've been disambiguating the {{tl|fiction}} template into different {{tl|In-universe}} templates, and did so for the [[Three Kingdoms]] articles as well. However, I think you are confused. Originally, the fiction template on those articles does not mean that they are portraying fiction in an in-universe style, but actually that the article literally \"fails to distinguish between fact or fiction\", or, in clearer terms: the article confuses the actual historical events of the Three Kingdoms (190-280) with those of the novel, ''[[Romance of the Three Kingdoms]]''. I hope you can make the necessary changes to the template, thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, I see you've been disambiguating the {{tl|fiction}} template into different {{tl|In-universe}} templates, and did so for the [[Three Kingdoms]] articles as well. However, I think you are confused. Originally, the fiction template on those articles does not mean that they are portraying fiction in an in-universe style, but actually that the article literally "fails to distinguish between fact or fiction", or, in clearer terms: the article confuses the actual historical events of the Three Kingdoms (190-280) with those of the novel, ''[[Romance of the Three Kingdoms]]''. I hope you can make the necessary changes to the template, thanks. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk|talk]]) 05:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
281572 +++$+++ Disavian +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281571 +++$+++ 281571 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.196947680E09 +++$+++ I can see the problem here, and I agree that {{t1|In-universe\/Three Kingdoms}} could do with some rewording. Hmm... Okay, I worked on it, how's that? \u2014 +++$+++ :I can see the problem here, and I agree that {{t1|In-universe/Three Kingdoms}} could do with some rewording. Hmm... Okay, I worked on it, how's that? —[[User:Disavian|Disavian]] ([[User talk:Disavian|<sup>talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Disavian|<sub>contribs</sub>]]) 05:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
281573 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281571 +++$+++ 281572 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.196948160E09 +++$+++ This is much better, thank you :)  +++$+++ ::This is much better, thank you :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk|talk]]) 05:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
281574 +++$+++ Disavian +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281571 +++$+++ 281573 +++$+++ 2007-12-06 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.196948400E09 +++$+++ There seem to be a lot of those articles... I've only gotten through D, and the category is already somewhat large. How many of them are really notable? \u2014 +++$+++ :::There seem to be a lot of those articles... I've only gotten through D, and the category is already somewhat large. How many of them are really notable? —[[User:Disavian|Disavian]] ([[User talk:Disavian|<sup>talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Disavian|<sub>contribs</sub>]]) 05:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

281575 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-09 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.197192180E09 +++$+++ I've been looking for a simple cover image to add to this article, but I've only been able to find two, and both have little watermark stamps from the websites that are hosting them. Do you know where we can find a clean image? I'd like to see at least one in there somewhere.  +++$+++ I've been looking for a simple cover image to add to this article, but I've only been able to find two, and both have little watermark stamps from the websites that are hosting them. Do you know where we can find a clean image? I'd like to see at least one in there somewhere. [[User:Gamer Junkie|<font face="Papyrus" color="teal">'''Gamer Junkie'''</font>]] 01:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
281576 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281575 +++$+++ 281575 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.197209340E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/www.gamecity.ne.jp\/products\/products\/ee\/Rlkoumei.htm Gameboy Advance version  +++$+++ :http://www.gamecity.ne.jp/products/products/ee/Rlkoumei.htm Gameboy Advance version [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
281577 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281575 +++$+++ 281576 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 10:15:00 +++$+++ 1.197224100E09 +++$+++ I knew you were the person to ask. I'll use the PlayStation image.  +++$+++ ::I knew you were the person to ask. I'll use the PlayStation image. [[User:Gamer Junkie|<font face="Papyrus" color="teal">'''Gamer Junkie'''</font>]] 10:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

543722 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-25 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.167093420E09 +++$+++ | [[Image:Adventsljusstake med tre brinnande ljus.JPG|150px|left]] <big>'''W'''<\/big>herever you are, and whether you're celebrating something or not, there is always a reason to spread the holiday spirit! So, may you have a great day, and may your wishes be fulfilled in 2007!  +++$+++ | [[Image:Adventsljusstake med tre brinnande ljus.JPG|150px|left]] <big>'''W'''</big>herever you are, and whether you're celebrating something or not, there is always a reason to spread the holiday spirit! So, may you have a great day, and may your wishes be fulfilled in 2007! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 16:37, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
543723 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543722 +++$+++ 543722 +++$+++ 2006-12-25 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.167095220E09 +++$+++ I am, thanks :)  +++$+++ :I am, thanks :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 17:07, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

281579 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-01 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.199176500E09 +++$+++ Hey _dk. I just got the [[Template:People of the Three Kingdoms]] un-protected so we can do work on it again. If you don't mind i added back [[Ji Ling]] and [[King Wutugu]] because I feel there respected armies are lacking in the template, and i also removed some people from wei, because there list was far too long. But now we have to figure how we are going to break this down. Are we going with the seperate template idea? -- +++$+++ Hey _dk. I just got the [[Template:People of the Three Kingdoms]] un-protected so we can do work on it again. If you don't mind i added back [[Ji Ling]] and [[King Wutugu]] because I feel there respected armies are lacking in the template, and i also removed some people from wei, because there list was far too long. But now we have to figure how we are going to break this down. Are we going with the seperate template idea? --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] ([[User talk:EveryDayJoe45|talk]]) 00:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
281580 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281579 +++$+++ 281579 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.199178420E09 +++$+++ Yea, when I'm free I might go make the prototypes for the split templates. (Though...their armies aren't very important, so I intended to leave them out of the template...)  +++$+++ :Yea, when I'm free I might go make the prototypes for the split templates. (Though...their armies aren't very important, so I intended to leave them out of the template...) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 01:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

543724 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-30 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.167524460E09 +++$+++ Tim, Samsara is absent from Wiki - not sure what's up there.  Try tariq (I can't remember his full name - I think I left it on your takl page earlier).   +++$+++ Tim, Samsara is absent from Wiki - not sure what's up there.  Try tariq (I can't remember his full name - I think I left it on your takl page earlier).  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
543725 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543724 +++$+++ 543724 +++$+++ 2006-12-30 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.167524580E09 +++$+++ Here it is {{user|tariqabjotu}}   +++$+++ :Here it is {{user|tariqabjotu}}  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:23, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

281581 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-05 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.199537220E09 +++$+++ These images will get sorted out. The licensing appears to be a legitimate \"[[:Category:Conditional use images|conditional use]]\". If so, the conditions are specific to these images, and it may be appropriate to create a template\/category just for them.  +++$+++ These images will get sorted out. The licensing appears to be a legitimate "[[:Category:Conditional use images|conditional use]]". If so, the conditions are specific to these images, and it may be appropriate to create a template/category just for them. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 04:47, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
281582 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 2008-01-05 06:24:00 +++$+++ 1.199543040E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid they wouldn't be \"sorted out\" properly since they are already deleted (with no warning or notification, and the deleting admin didn't respond to me yet). Can't put them in a category if they don't exist any more. Thank you for your willingness to help.  +++$+++ :I'm afraid they wouldn't be "sorted out" properly since they are already deleted (with no warning or notification, and the deleting admin didn't respond to me yet). Can't put them in a category if they don't exist any more. Thank you for your willingness to help. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
281583 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281582 +++$+++ 2008-01-05 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.199543640E09 +++$+++ Gimmetrow, if it's all right with you, would you be willing to restore the images?  +++$+++ ::Gimmetrow, if it's all right with you, would you be willing to restore the images? [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
281584 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 2008-01-05 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.199544900E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#List_of_Touhou_Project_characters]]. I'd like to hear what others say, first. The images aren't going to disappear, and undeleting them won't take long.  +++$+++ : See [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#List_of_Touhou_Project_characters]]. I'd like to hear what others say, first. The images aren't going to disappear, and undeleting them won't take long. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 06:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
281585 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281584 +++$+++ 2008-01-05 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.199546100E09 +++$+++ Thank you, you've been a great help.  +++$+++ ::Thank you, you've been a great help. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 07:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
281586 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281585 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.199812320E09 +++$+++ This seems to be dragging on. Why don't you try emailing [[m:OTRS]] with your info and translation, and hopefully they'll resolve this or give you some feedback. You may hear back that there's some deficiency (in Wiki terms) in the way the permission is worded on the page, and if so, you may be out of luck. I think it's unreasonable to expect the game creators to bother with this.  +++$+++ ::: This seems to be dragging on. Why don't you try emailing [[m:OTRS]] with your info and translation, and hopefully they'll resolve this or give you some feedback. You may hear back that there's some deficiency (in Wiki terms) in the way the permission is worded on the page, and if so, you may be out of luck. I think it's unreasonable to expect the game creators to bother with this. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 09:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
281587 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281586 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.199813820E09 +++$+++ I agree, and that is one of the reasons I am not willing to resort to OTRS. Thank you for all your help so far, but I think I'll just give up, since although ZUN gave his permission for screenshots on \"strategy guides and such\", it is unlikely that he would agree to those images to be in \"games\", like Azatoth asked (Although ZUN explicitly allowed derivative works of his games for any purpose). The images, despite the time I spent uploading them, do not worth all this trouble for you and me....Now the only thing that's bugging me in this episode is the way the deletion was carried out....  +++$+++ ::::I agree, and that is one of the reasons I am not willing to resort to OTRS. Thank you for all your help so far, but I think I'll just give up, since although ZUN gave his permission for screenshots on "strategy guides and such", it is unlikely that he would agree to those images to be in "games", like Azatoth asked (Although ZUN explicitly allowed derivative works of his games for any purpose). The images, despite the time I spent uploading them, do not worth all this trouble for you and me....Now the only thing that's bugging me in this episode is the way the deletion was carried out.... [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 09:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
281588 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281587 +++$+++ 2008-01-09 07:48:00 +++$+++ 1.199893680E09 +++$+++ The latter is an issue. As for the game suggestion, Aza hasn't decided to reply yet. If you can find ZUN's derivative work statement on the games, that should be more than enough to resolve this.  +++$+++ ::::: The latter is an issue. As for the game suggestion, Aza hasn't decided to reply yet. If you can find ZUN's derivative work statement on the games, that should be more than enough to resolve this. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 07:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
281589 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281588 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.200401160E09 +++$+++ Would you kindly give it a try with official wiki channels?  +++$+++ :::::: Would you kindly give it a try with official wiki channels? [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 04:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
281590 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281589 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.200401700E09 +++$+++ What official wiki channels?  +++$+++ :::::::What official wiki channels? [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 04:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
281591 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281590 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.200402420E09 +++$+++ OTRS. At this point why not try?   +++$+++ :::::::: OTRS. At this point why not try?  [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 05:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
281592 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281591 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.200403560E09 +++$+++ Not worth the effort, I think. Furthermore, reading and translating Japanese is one thing, writing in Japanese (so I can tell ZUN to mail to OTRS) is another.  +++$+++ :::::::::Not worth the effort, I think. Furthermore, reading and translating Japanese is one thing, writing in Japanese (so I can tell ZUN to mail to OTRS) is another. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 05:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
281593 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281592 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 06:15:00 +++$+++ 1.200406500E09 +++$+++ No, YOU mail OTRS with your translations. What do you have to lose, but the few minutes it would take to put them together with an explanation of the situation?  +++$+++ :::::::::: No, YOU mail OTRS with your translations. What do you have to lose, but the few minutes it would take to put them together with an explanation of the situation? [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 06:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
281594 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281593 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.200407160E09 +++$+++ I don't quite get what's going on, you're saying that I should mail OTRS, while BetaCommand said they need a mail from the copyright holder...? Besides, what good would it do if I mail OTRS when the issue couldn't get resolved in WP:AN?  +++$+++ :::::::::::I don't quite get what's going on, you're saying that I should mail OTRS, while BetaCommand said they need a mail from the copyright holder...? Besides, what good would it do if I mail OTRS when the issue couldn't get resolved in WP:AN? [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
281595 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281594 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.200407640E09 +++$+++ Nobody but me, beta and aza responded on WP:AN. Using OTRS will at least get someone else to reply. The reply could \"no, we need ZUN\", or it could be \"OK, that's good enough\". We do allow images with certain types of conditions.  +++$+++ :::::::::::: Nobody but me, beta and aza responded on WP:AN. Using OTRS will at least get someone else to reply. The reply could "no, we need ZUN", or it could be "OK, that's good enough". We do allow images with certain types of conditions. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 06:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
281596 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281595 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.200409200E09 +++$+++ ugh, I read the whole [[m:OTRS]] page 3 times and I still have no idea who\/where should I email....  +++$+++ ::::::::::::: ugh, I read the whole [[m:OTRS]] page 3 times and I still have no idea who/where should I email.... [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 07:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
281597 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281594 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 07:17:00 +++$+++ 1.200410220E09 +++$+++ You're right that's confusing. I think any email to the WMF is handled by the OTRS system, so try an address from [http:\/\/wikimediafoundation.org\/wiki\/Contact_us this page].  +++$+++ :::::::::::: You're right that's confusing. I think any email to the WMF is handled by the OTRS system, so try an address from [http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Contact_us this page]. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 07:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
281598 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281581 +++$+++ 281597 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.200412560E09 +++$+++ Okay, sent.  +++$+++ :::::::::::::Okay, sent. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 07:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

543726 +++$+++ Ciar +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543726 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-30 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.167538920E09 +++$+++ Yep, I am a fellow Scot. I studied just an hour away from you in Aberdeen, but like you, after getting my PhD I took off to work in the US (D'oh...there goes my anonymity ;-)).  Thanks for the nice words about the work I've done here on the immunology pages, at least I know I'm heading things in the right direction.  I had just started with filling in gaps of info I wanted to find here (but couldn't) in wikipedia, and then got totally hooked! You're right, there's a lot missing in the immunology section, so hopefully the few regular editors will not give up!!  I'm happy to help you as best I can with your immunology questions, so fire away.  And I'm sure if I have a parasite question, I'll be knocking on your door.  Which reminds me...for tomorrow...HAPPY HOGMANAY!!  Cheers,  +++$+++ Yep, I am a fellow Scot. I studied just an hour away from you in Aberdeen, but like you, after getting my PhD I took off to work in the US (D'oh...there goes my anonymity ;-)).  Thanks for the nice words about the work I've done here on the immunology pages, at least I know I'm heading things in the right direction.  I had just started with filling in gaps of info I wanted to find here (but couldn't) in wikipedia, and then got totally hooked! You're right, there's a lot missing in the immunology section, so hopefully the few regular editors will not give up!!  I'm happy to help you as best I can with your immunology questions, so fire away.  And I'm sure if I have a parasite question, I'll be knocking on your door.  Which reminds me...for tomorrow...HAPPY HOGMANAY!!  Cheers, [[User:Ciar|Ciar]] 20:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
543727 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543726 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-31 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.167565020E09 +++$+++ From me too!! Thanks you so much for you wonderful changes to the article. Damn you ask some good questions, I had to (unknowingly) scour some pretty dirty pages to find some of those answers. Again, I really appreciate it, I had a look at the DNA article, great work, but 9 other people had already voted to support, so I just thought I'd tell you. So, what do you think my chances are?-- +++$+++ ::From me too!! Thanks you so much for you wonderful changes to the article. Damn you ask some good questions, I had to (unknowingly) scour some pretty dirty pages to find some of those answers. Again, I really appreciate it, I had a look at the DNA article, great work, but 9 other people had already voted to support, so I just thought I'd tell you. So, what do you think my chances are?--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 03:37, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

543728 +++$+++ Opabinia regalis +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-31 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.167582360E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim - don't know if you saw Samsara's userpage, but he's not around much these days. I protected the templates that weren't already protected on [[influenza]], but I've been mostly on vacation and am still catching up with things around here - do you know what's been done with images on commons lately? In the past, I remember seeing some temporarily copied here and protected, and some protected there, and some left alone, but don't know if that was a function of a discussion or just how easy it was to poke a commons admin.  +++$+++ Hi Tim - don't know if you saw Samsara's userpage, but he's not around much these days. I protected the templates that weren't already protected on [[influenza]], but I've been mostly on vacation and am still catching up with things around here - do you know what's been done with images on commons lately? In the past, I remember seeing some temporarily copied here and protected, and some protected there, and some left alone, but don't know if that was a function of a discussion or just how easy it was to poke a commons admin. [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] 08:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
543729 +++$+++ Opabinia regalis +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543728 +++$+++ 543728 +++$+++ 2006-12-31 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.167618300E09 +++$+++ The only image left is [[:Image:Flu_und_legende_color_c.jpg]], which is on commons with an obsolete PD tag. It's not immediately obvious to me where it came from when it was originally uploaded to de.  +++$+++ : The only image left is [[:Image:Flu_und_legende_color_c.jpg]], which is on commons with an obsolete PD tag. It's not immediately obvious to me where it came from when it was originally uploaded to de. [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] 18:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

19441 +++$+++ 218.250.143.16 +++$+++ ASDFGH +++$+++ 19441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-05 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.307339520E09 +++$+++ No where in PRC's 1982 constitution or in any law that special administrative regions are defined to be equivalent to provinces, or are placed within PRC's administrative division hierachy. Before removing {{tl|cn}} tags please provide reliable, authoritative and legally binding source justifying such claims. Thank you. [[Special:Contributions\/218.250.143.16|218.250.143.16]] ( +++$+++ No where in PRC's 1982 constitution or in any law that special administrative regions are defined to be equivalent to provinces, or are placed within PRC's administrative division hierachy. Before removing {{tl|cn}} tags please provide reliable, authoritative and legally binding source justifying such claims. Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/218.250.143.16|218.250.143.16]] ([[User talk:218.250.143.16|talk]]) 22:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
19442 +++$+++ User:benlisquare +++$+++ ASDFGH +++$+++ 19441 +++$+++ 19441 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.307361540E09 +++$+++ <s>With all due respect, the 1982 constitution was formulated ''how many years'' before 1997? In which case, you should be referring to the Basic Law of Hong Kong, and not the constitution. What you have said makes just as much logic as citing Roman Law to discuss the legality of Hitler's leadership in Germany.<\/s> --<span style=\"border:1px solid yellow;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :<s>With all due respect, the 1982 constitution was formulated ''how many years'' before 1997? In which case, you should be referring to the Basic Law of Hong Kong, and not the constitution. What you have said makes just as much logic as citing Roman Law to discuss the legality of Hitler's leadership in Germany.</s> --<span style="border:1px solid yellow;padding:1px;">[[User:benlisquare|<font style="color:#FFFF00;background:red;">'''&nbsp;李博杰&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> | <small>—[[User talk:benlisquare|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Benlisquare|contribs]] [[Special:EmailUser/User:Benlisquare|email]]</small> 04:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
19443 +++$+++ User:benlisquare +++$+++ ASDFGH +++$+++ 19441 +++$+++ 19442 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.307364180E09 +++$+++ Well, it appears that he was referring to the ''2004 Revision'' of the PRC constitution. Be more clear next time. --<span style=\"border:1px solid yellow;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::Well, it appears that he was referring to the ''2004 Revision'' of the PRC constitution. Be more clear next time. --<span style="border:1px solid yellow;padding:1px;">[[User:benlisquare|<font style="color:#FFFF00;background:red;">'''&nbsp;李博杰&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span> | <small>—[[User talk:benlisquare|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Benlisquare|contribs]] [[Special:EmailUser/User:Benlisquare|email]]</small> 05:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
19444 +++$+++ 218.250.143.16 +++$+++ ASDFGH +++$+++ 19441 +++$+++ 19443 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.307377740E09 +++$+++ As far as Article 31 (which provides for the establishment of special administrative regions) is concerned, it has never been amended since the 1982 Constitution was promulgated. None of the amendments to the 1982 Constitution touches on Article 31. When we talk about laws, e.g., an act titled ''Foo Act 1801'', we still call it ''Foo Act 1801'' even if two of the sections of the original act were amended by ''Foo Amendment Act 1902''. [[Special:Contributions\/218.250.143.16|218.250.143.16]] ( +++$+++ ::: As far as Article 31 (which provides for the establishment of special administrative regions) is concerned, it has never been amended since the 1982 Constitution was promulgated. None of the amendments to the 1982 Constitution touches on Article 31. When we talk about laws, e.g., an act titled ''Foo Act 1801'', we still call it ''Foo Act 1801'' even if two of the sections of the original act were amended by ''Foo Amendment Act 1902''. [[Special:Contributions/218.250.143.16|218.250.143.16]] ([[User talk:218.250.143.16|talk]]) 09:29, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

543730 +++$+++ Slashme +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-01 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.167644700E09 +++$+++ So all those LB plots are just a plot.  Hah.  Do you have an example of a publication that says what was fitted to what?  I just fitted Michaelis Menten with Gnuplot, and used the asymptotic standard error reported for the parameters as a confidence interval, giving me weightings for my next curve fit: 1\/vmax vs inhibitor concentration and km vs inhibitor concentration.  In my ignorance, I just plotted that, my reasoning being that if you see a slope on km vs [I], there's competitive inhibition going on, and if you see a slope on 1\/vmax vs [I], there's non-competitive inhibition going on.  My prof. said that everyone plots Lineweaver Burke, and that's exactly what I saw in the literature. -- +++$+++ So all those LB plots are just a plot.  Hah.  Do you have an example of a publication that says what was fitted to what?  I just fitted Michaelis Menten with Gnuplot, and used the asymptotic standard error reported for the parameters as a confidence interval, giving me weightings for my next curve fit: 1/vmax vs inhibitor concentration and km vs inhibitor concentration.  In my ignorance, I just plotted that, my reasoning being that if you see a slope on km vs [I], there's competitive inhibition going on, and if you see a slope on 1/vmax vs [I], there's non-competitive inhibition going on.  My prof. said that everyone plots Lineweaver Burke, and that's exactly what I saw in the literature. --[[User:Slashme|Slashme]] 01:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
543731 +++$+++ Slashme +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543730 +++$+++ 543730 +++$+++ 2007-01-01 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.167646980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the article, very instructive!  -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the article, very instructive!  --[[User:Slashme|Slashme]] 02:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

543733 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-01 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.167714000E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Tim - that is very much appreciated.  I'm afraid I've been frustrated and ineffective on reverting the vandalism:  I don't know if my computer is just too slow, or if those ELAC cops were right, but I just can't pull the history up fast enough to revert before someone else does, so I should probably stop trying.  Happy New Year there !   +++$+++ Thanks, Tim - that is very much appreciated.  I'm afraid I've been frustrated and ineffective on reverting the vandalism:  I don't know if my computer is just too slow, or if those ELAC cops were right, but I just can't pull the history up fast enough to revert before someone else does, so I should probably stop trying.  Happy New Year there !  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
543734 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543733 +++$+++ 543733 +++$+++ 2007-01-01 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.167722460E09 +++$+++ Tim, I don't think I can [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Influenza&diff=97814321&oldid=97813913 revert this as vandalism] - it could be a good faith edit - but I'm not sure it's correct?   +++$+++ :Tim, I don't think I can [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Influenza&diff=97814321&oldid=97813913 revert this as vandalism] - it could be a good faith edit - but I'm not sure it's correct?  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

604175 +++$+++ Garykirk +++$+++ Gary Kirk +++$+++ 604175 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-31 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.138731720E09 +++$+++ --<font color=\"green\"><b> +++$+++ --<font color="green"><b>[[User:Garykirk|Gary Kirk]]</b></font> [[User_talk:Garykirk|(talk)]] 10:22, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
604176 +++$+++ Cleared as filed +++$+++ Gary Kirk +++$+++ 604175 +++$+++ 604175 +++$+++ 2006-01-31 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.138743300E09 +++$+++ Hi, Gary.  I received your e-mail and would have unblocked you but by the time I read the e-mail, the block had already expired.  Sorry that block of the anon caught you too \u2014 I'll keep that in mind the next time I see vandalism by that IP address.  Sorry again. \u2014 +++$+++ : Hi, Gary.  I received your e-mail and would have unblocked you but by the time I read the e-mail, the block had already expired.  Sorry that block of the anon caught you too — I'll keep that in mind the next time I see vandalism by that IP address.  Sorry again. —[[User:Cleared as filed|Cleared as filed.]] 13:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

543737 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.167789240E09 +++$+++ Hi Sandy. We have gone through this article and made some improvements. Could you have a look at the new draft and see what you think? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Sandy. We have gone through this article and made some improvements. Could you have a look at the new draft and see what you think? Thanks. [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 17:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
543738 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543737 +++$+++ 543737 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.167789840E09 +++$+++ Hey, Tim.  I looked at it last night and noticed the *vast* improvement.  But, as a layperson, I'm having a hard time with it.  Without a background in biology or medicine, there are many parts I don't expect to be able to thoroughly digest (and it doesn't trouble me if some sections are over my head), but unlike DNA or Enzyme stuff (and more like Tuberculosis), as a layperson, I do expect to be able to understand certain sections of this article.  If a family member has an immune-related illness, I want to be able to digest certain parts of this article, even without a biology background.  Can you all run through it again with people like me in mind, and then I'll have another look?  In particular, can the lead be made more non-biologist-friendly, for folks like me?  The lead dives straight in to some very technical stuff.    +++$+++ :Hey, Tim.  I looked at it last night and noticed the *vast* improvement.  But, as a layperson, I'm having a hard time with it.  Without a background in biology or medicine, there are many parts I don't expect to be able to thoroughly digest (and it doesn't trouble me if some sections are over my head), but unlike DNA or Enzyme stuff (and more like Tuberculosis), as a layperson, I do expect to be able to understand certain sections of this article.  If a family member has an immune-related illness, I want to be able to digest certain parts of this article, even without a biology background.  Can you all run through it again with people like me in mind, and then I'll have another look?  In particular, can the lead be made more non-biologist-friendly, for folks like me?  The lead dives straight in to some very technical stuff.   [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:04, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

543739 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.167800280E09 +++$+++ Tim, I only know of these procedures from [[Tourette syndrome]] ([[PANDAS]] hypothesis) - don't know if any mention of them is warranted in the article?  I understand that [[Intravenous immunoglobulin]] (IVIG) and [[Plasmapheresis]] (plasma exchange) are dangerous and unproven treatments in PANDAS, but accepted for other immune deficiencies.  Maybe rather than in the System article, they belong somewhere like [[Immunodeficiency]] (?) - I can't find an article specifically relating to the various diseases.  Or maybe they belong in the treatment section of [[Autoimmunity]] - there seem to be a lot of overlapping articles.   +++$+++ Tim, I only know of these procedures from [[Tourette syndrome]] ([[PANDAS]] hypothesis) - don't know if any mention of them is warranted in the article?  I understand that [[Intravenous immunoglobulin]] (IVIG) and [[Plasmapheresis]] (plasma exchange) are dangerous and unproven treatments in PANDAS, but accepted for other immune deficiencies.  Maybe rather than in the System article, they belong somewhere like [[Immunodeficiency]] (?) - I can't find an article specifically relating to the various diseases.  Or maybe they belong in the treatment section of [[Autoimmunity]] - there seem to be a lot of overlapping articles.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
543740 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543739 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.167814380E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, I have had a good long look at the article and fixed a few things that were questionable. On the whole, the article looks great. Too bad you can't clone yourself so that every article could be improved the way this one has. While I am a bit sorry that I recommended the article for FA, (apparently I vastly over-estimated my abilities) I am really glad that it has gotten so much attention, and I think that you are really to thank for that. Cheers-- +++$+++ ::Hi Tim, I have had a good long look at the article and fixed a few things that were questionable. On the whole, the article looks great. Too bad you can't clone yourself so that every article could be improved the way this one has. While I am a bit sorry that I recommended the article for FA, (apparently I vastly over-estimated my abilities) I am really glad that it has gotten so much attention, and I think that you are really to thank for that. Cheers--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 00:53, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
543741 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543739 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.167815100E09 +++$+++ Nah, don't say that about yourself, DO11 - there's a whole lot of overhead that goes into writing Wikified text, that has little relationship to your knowledge or abilities - you've done a great job, and I'm sure you'll write greater articles still :-)   +++$+++ :::Nah, don't say that about yourself, DO11 - there's a whole lot of overhead that goes into writing Wikified text, that has little relationship to your knowledge or abilities - you've done a great job, and I'm sure you'll write greater articles still :-)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
543742 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543739 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.167874380E09 +++$+++ Thanks Sandy and Tim, I do feel really good about the article as it is now. I have a small question, should I note my support of the new version on the cantidates page? (I really just don't know if that is the proper protocol.)-- +++$+++ ::Thanks Sandy and Tim, I do feel really good about the article as it is now. I have a small question, should I note my support of the new version on the cantidates page? (I really just don't know if that is the proper protocol.)--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 17:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

281599 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-09 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.199900940E09 +++$+++ Well? What do you think?  +++$+++ Well? What do you think? [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 09:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
281600 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281599 +++$+++ 281599 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.199966400E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure how to understand that in wiki-speak, because it seems to distinguish between \"commercial\" and \"for sale\". Although this is pretty broad permission you're going to have to ping someone else for a resolution. Unfortunately, the editor I trust for licensing questions is on wikibreak.  +++$+++ : I'm not sure how to understand that in wiki-speak, because it seems to distinguish between "commercial" and "for sale". Although this is pretty broad permission you're going to have to ping someone else for a resolution. Unfortunately, the editor I trust for licensing questions is on wikibreak. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 04:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

281601 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-16 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.200495000E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't say that license prohibits commercial use....but whatever, that's that.  +++$+++ I wouldn't say that license prohibits commercial use....but whatever, that's that. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
281602 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281601 +++$+++ 281601 +++$+++ 2008-02-02 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.202018460E09 +++$+++ That's unfortunate. But as I suspected, allowing derivate works \"for sale\" in doujin shops, but \"commercially\" outside those shops only with permission, is not quite what WP is looking for. Sorry this didn't work out.  +++$+++ : That's unfortunate. But as I suspected, allowing derivate works "for sale" in doujin shops, but "commercially" outside those shops only with permission, is not quite what WP is looking for. Sorry this didn't work out. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 22:01, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
281603 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281601 +++$+++ 281601 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.203984540E09 +++$+++ I had this posted on [[Talk:List of Touhou Project characters]], but the people here didn't think it was adequate. Thanks anyways, Solamarle :)  +++$+++ :I had this posted on [[Talk:List of Touhou Project characters]], but the people here didn't think it was adequate. Thanks anyways, Solamarle :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 16:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
281604 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281601 +++$+++ 281603 +++$+++ 2008-02-27 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.204119780E09 +++$+++ I'm assuming you sent that as part of the otrs email, right?  +++$+++ :: I'm assuming you sent that as part of the otrs email, right? [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 05:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
281605 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281601 +++$+++ 281604 +++$+++ 2008-02-27 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.204120320E09 +++$+++ Yes, I did.  +++$+++ ::: Yes, I did. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 05:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

543746 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-04 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.167903960E09 +++$+++ I understand. I'll admit, I'm a little anal about sourcing, but I believe that everything needs to be sourced. If the references are at the beginning of the section, those refs can just be used again. If looking cluttered is a fear, then all of the sources for the paragraph could be placed at the end of the paragraph.  +++$+++ I understand. I'll admit, I'm a little anal about sourcing, but I believe that everything needs to be sourced. If the references are at the beginning of the section, those refs can just be used again. If looking cluttered is a fear, then all of the sources for the paragraph could be placed at the end of the paragraph. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 01:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
543747 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543746 +++$+++ 543746 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 04:15:00 +++$+++ 1.167912900E09 +++$+++ Also, [[Wikipedia:Scientific citation guidelines]] is only a guideline, which I have vigorously opposed (at least until I got bored with the topic droning on for months and months).  The guiding *policy* for FAs is [[WP:V]], which IMO, those *guidelines* run afoul of.  They came about because the math\/physics groups disagreed with some editors at [[WP:GA]] who wanted them to cite their articles. The guiding policy is that a cite should be provided when one is requested.  The \"guideline\" might be useful for internal ranking of articles that don't intend to approach [[WP:GAC]] or [[WP:FAC]], but not for [[WP:WIAFA]], which relies on [[WP:V]] policy.  +++$+++ :Also, [[Wikipedia:Scientific citation guidelines]] is only a guideline, which I have vigorously opposed (at least until I got bored with the topic droning on for months and months).  The guiding *policy* for FAs is [[WP:V]], which IMO, those *guidelines* run afoul of.  They came about because the math/physics groups disagreed with some editors at [[WP:GA]] who wanted them to cite their articles. The guiding policy is that a cite should be provided when one is requested.  The "guideline" might be useful for internal ranking of articles that don't intend to approach [[WP:GAC]] or [[WP:FAC]], but not for [[WP:WIAFA]], which relies on [[WP:V]] policy. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 04:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
543748 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543746 +++$+++ 543747 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.168460580E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for your kind words, and the shiny thing; your work on [[DNA]] and [[immune system]] were just stellar! :D Someday, I swear, if you're patient with me, I'll explain [[Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector]] and you'll appreciate how beautiful she is. :)  +++$+++ ::Thanks so much for your kind words, and the shiny thing; your work on [[DNA]] and [[immune system]] were just stellar! :D Someday, I swear, if you're patient with me, I'll explain [[Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector]] and you'll appreciate how beautiful she is. :) [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 12:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

19459 +++$+++ T. Anthony +++$+++ T. Anthony +++$+++ 19459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-19 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.298129640E09 +++$+++ I actually haven't checked my user categories for awhile. I also don't seem to be getting what you're getting unless I misunderstand you. Still I'll leave this conversation up as there's apparently interest in it.-- +++$+++ I actually haven't checked my user categories for awhile. I also don't seem to be getting what you're getting unless I misunderstand you. Still I'll leave this conversation up as there's apparently interest in it.--[[User:T. Anthony|T. Anthony]] ([[User talk:T. Anthony#top|talk]]) 07:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
19460 +++$+++ Kenatipo +++$+++ T. Anthony +++$+++ 19459 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.298152920E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Sarek, for doing that for me.  And thanks, TA, for letting us gab on your talk page.  I think you can delete this now if you want to!  -- +++$+++ ::Thank you, Sarek, for doing that for me.  And thanks, TA, for letting us gab on your talk page.  I think you can delete this now if you want to!  --[[User:Kenatipo|<span style="color:#933;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''<big>Kenatipo</big>'''</span>]]  <sup>[[User talk:Kenatipo|speak!]]</sup> 14:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
19461 +++$+++ T. Anthony +++$+++ T. Anthony +++$+++ 19459 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-19 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.298181540E09 +++$+++ Oh no problem.-- +++$+++ :::Oh no problem.--[[User:T. Anthony|T. Anthony]] ([[User talk:T. Anthony#top|talk]]) 21:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
19462 +++$+++ T. Anthony +++$+++ T. Anthony +++$+++ 19459 +++$+++ 19459 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 06:39:00 +++$+++ 1.303738740E09 +++$+++ I should probably look into that. I'm not familiar with him, but sometime this week I might get to that if you don't. However if you want to do it feel free.-- +++$+++ :I should probably look into that. I'm not familiar with him, but sometime this week I might get to that if you don't. However if you want to do it feel free.--[[User:T. Anthony|T. Anthony]] ([[User talk:T. Anthony#top|talk]]) 06:39, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

543749 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-04 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.167952320E09 +++$+++ Tim, would you mind having a look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=DNA&diff=98415823&oldid=98351591 this edit], specifically the article \"cited\"? The information it presents could be a nice future addition\u2014''correctly presented'', that is\u2014and a quick explanation as to its contents might be in order if the user who added this \"citation\" does it again. Thanks,  +++$+++ Tim, would you mind having a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DNA&diff=98415823&oldid=98351591 this edit], specifically the article "cited"? The information it presents could be a nice future addition—''correctly presented'', that is—and a quick explanation as to its contents might be in order if the user who added this "citation" does it again. Thanks, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 15:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
543750 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543749 +++$+++ 543749 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.167973200E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I didn't mean the [[DNA]] article specifically; I'm not sure how relevant this information would be. It seemed to me a \"new\" development, and I don't know how it will pan out (i.e., is it broadly accepted in the scientific community), so I'll leave it to you to decide whether it could be useful :) I'm a bit busy today, but I'll have a look at [[immune system]] as soon as I can. Glad to see the \"FA machine\" is hard at work... :)  +++$+++ :Sorry, I didn't mean the [[DNA]] article specifically; I'm not sure how relevant this information would be. It seemed to me a "new" development, and I don't know how it will pan out (i.e., is it broadly accepted in the scientific community), so I'll leave it to you to decide whether it could be useful :) I'm a bit busy today, but I'll have a look at [[immune system]] as soon as I can. Glad to see the "FA machine" is hard at work... :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 21:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

543752 +++$+++ Hurricanehink +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543752 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-05 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.167991140E09 +++$+++ Here's some things off the top of my head. Some citations are needed. Like the other article, I think there are a few too many sentences in parenthesis. There are four times when the article says to see elsewhere, which doesn't seem like compelling prose. I just noticed, \"To meet this challenge\" in the lede, and I think it should be reworded (it's a bit trite. I would rewrite some of the image captions, as some are a bit too long. Are there any differences in the immune system of the human or any other animal? It says in the lede that multiple organisms have evolved to recognize and neutralize pathogens, but is it all, or have some notable ones not evolved it?  +++$+++ Here's some things off the top of my head. Some citations are needed. Like the other article, I think there are a few too many sentences in parenthesis. There are four times when the article says to see elsewhere, which doesn't seem like compelling prose. I just noticed, "To meet this challenge" in the lede, and I think it should be reworded (it's a bit trite. I would rewrite some of the image captions, as some are a bit too long. Are there any differences in the immune system of the human or any other animal? It says in the lede that multiple organisms have evolved to recognize and neutralize pathogens, but is it all, or have some notable ones not evolved it? [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 01:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
543753 +++$+++ Adenosine +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543752 +++$+++ 543752 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.168057200E09 +++$+++ as for the animal immune systems, there are differences, minor tho. All jawed vertebrates (I sure hope I'm not wrong) have more or less the same 'design' in immunity. They all rely on antibodies, t-cells, B-cells, and other white blood cells.  +++$+++ :as for the animal immune systems, there are differences, minor tho. All jawed vertebrates (I sure hope I'm not wrong) have more or less the same 'design' in immunity. They all rely on antibodies, t-cells, B-cells, and other white blood cells. [[User:Adenosine|Adenosine]][[User talk:Adenosine|<sup>talk</sup>]] 20:20, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
543754 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543752 +++$+++ 543753 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.168415040E09 +++$+++ Thanks Tim!! Ohh, pretty, shiny medal. Thanks again for all of your hard work, I know that if it hadn't been for you the article never would have made it. If you ever need anything (even grunt work) drop me a line, I owe you a few favors.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks Tim!! Ohh, pretty, shiny medal. Thanks again for all of your hard work, I know that if it hadn't been for you the article never would have made it. If you ever need anything (even grunt work) drop me a line, I owe you a few favors.--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 23:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
543755 +++$+++ Ciar +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543752 +++$+++ 543754 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.168437060E09 +++$+++ Ta very muckle for the medal Tim...although I don't feel I really deserve it for my puny bit of effort compared to you and DO11.10, it sure brightens up my talk page...and my day!!  Thanks! and good luck with your next venture!!!  +++$+++ :::Ta very muckle for the medal Tim...although I don't feel I really deserve it for my puny bit of effort compared to you and DO11.10, it sure brightens up my talk page...and my day!!  Thanks! and good luck with your next venture!!! [[User:Ciar|Ciar]] 05:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

19465 +++$+++ Smalleywall +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19465 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-31 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.306892400E09 +++$+++ I'm relatively new to editing Wikipedia, and I was just wondering what you meant by tagging that additional sources or references are needed for the Susan Smalley article? It seems to me that there are plenty of third-party sources referenced on the page, but as you are the one who flagged it, I wanted to check with you first before removing the alert. Thanks!-- +++$+++ I'm relatively new to editing Wikipedia, and I was just wondering what you meant by tagging that additional sources or references are needed for the Susan Smalley article? It seems to me that there are plenty of third-party sources referenced on the page, but as you are the one who flagged it, I wanted to check with you first before removing the alert. Thanks!--[[User:Smalleywall|Smalleywall]] ([[User talk:Smalleywall|talk]]) 18:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
19466 +++$+++ Chris_Capoccia +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19465 +++$+++ 19465 +++$+++ 2011-05-31 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.306898760E09 +++$+++ thanks.&nbsp;&nbsp;\u2014 +++$+++ :thanks.&nbsp;&nbsp;—[[User:Chris_Capoccia |Chris Capoccia]]  <sup>[[User talk:Chris_Capoccia|T]]</sup>&#8260;<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chris_Capoccia|C]]</sub> 20:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

19467 +++$+++ Videsh Ramsahai +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-07 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.307485560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Videsh Ramsahai|Videsh Ramsahai]] ([[User talk:Videsh Ramsahai|talk]]) 15:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
19468 +++$+++ Chris_Capoccia +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19467 +++$+++ 19467 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.307487720E09 +++$+++ nothing in wikipedia articles is allowed to be based on your interpretation. it must be referencing statements from reliable sources. see [[Wikipedia:No original research]] and [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources]]. if there are not enough reliable sources, the article should not exist on wikipedia. it should be published somewhere else instead.&nbsp;&nbsp;\u2014 +++$+++ :nothing in wikipedia articles is allowed to be based on your interpretation. it must be referencing statements from reliable sources. see [[Wikipedia:No original research]] and [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources]]. if there are not enough reliable sources, the article should not exist on wikipedia. it should be published somewhere else instead.&nbsp;&nbsp;—[[User:Chris_Capoccia |Chris Capoccia]]  <sup>[[User talk:Chris_Capoccia|T]]</sup>&#8260;<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chris_Capoccia|C]]</sub> 16:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

19469 +++$+++ Videsh Ramsahai +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19469 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-08 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.307539680E09 +++$+++ The Long and short of the story is I'm compiling two datasets together with a few taxonomic kinks to work out. Also i cannot cite what is not explicitly stated by either online databases.  ---  +++$+++ The Long and short of the story is I'm compiling two datasets together with a few taxonomic kinks to work out. Also i cannot cite what is not explicitly stated by either online databases.  --- [[User:Videsh Ramsahai|Videsh Ramsahai]] ([[User talk:Videsh Ramsahai|talk]]) 06:28, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
19470 +++$+++ Chris_Capoccia +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19469 +++$+++ 19469 +++$+++ 2011-06-08 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.307560920E09 +++$+++ i think maybe you still haven't read [[Wikipedia:No original research]].&nbsp;&nbsp;\u2014 +++$+++ :i think maybe you still haven't read [[Wikipedia:No original research]].&nbsp;&nbsp;—[[User:Chris_Capoccia |Chris Capoccia]]  <sup>[[User talk:Chris_Capoccia|T]]</sup>&#8260;<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chris_Capoccia|C]]</sub> 12:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

281614 +++$+++ TheAsianGURU +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-28 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.201537260E09 +++$+++ I stand corrected. Thank you.  +++$+++ I stand corrected. Thank you. [[User:TheAsianGURU|TheAsianGURU]] ([[User talk:TheAsianGURU|talk]]) 08:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
281615 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281614 +++$+++ 281614 +++$+++ 2008-01-28 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.201537380E09 +++$+++ No problem.  +++$+++ :No problem. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 08:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

19471 +++$+++ PietrH +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.309743300E09 +++$+++ \u2014 +++$+++ —[[User:PietrH|PietrH]] ([[User talk:PietrH|talk]]) 18:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
19472 +++$+++ Chris_Capoccia +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19471 +++$+++ 19471 +++$+++ 2011-07-04 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.309762980E09 +++$+++ you're welcome (yes, my talk page is the right place). glad i could help. most of my edits lately have been cleanup.&nbsp;&nbsp;\u2014 +++$+++ :you're welcome (yes, my talk page is the right place). glad i could help. most of my edits lately have been cleanup.&nbsp;&nbsp;—[[User:Chris_Capoccia |Chris Capoccia]]  <sup>[[User talk:Chris_Capoccia|T]]</sup>&#8260;<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chris_Capoccia|C]]</sub> 00:03, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

281616 +++$+++ TheAsianGURU +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281616 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-28 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.201577880E09 +++$+++ I just updated the article with Infobox Military Conflict per your suggestion. Please take a look to see if you can improve. Thank you.  +++$+++ I just updated the article with Infobox Military Conflict per your suggestion. Please take a look to see if you can improve. Thank you. [[User:TheAsianGURU|TheAsianGURU]] ([[User talk:TheAsianGURU|talk]]) 19:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
281617 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281616 +++$+++ 281616 +++$+++ 2008-01-28 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.201578780E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I've made some minor edits to it  +++$+++ :Thanks, I've made some minor edits to it [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 19:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

19473 +++$+++ Pgr94 +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.311888120E09 +++$+++ Please could you make it clear in your edit comments that you are removing primary sources as you did here: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Hypothyroidism&curid=65845&diff=441859037&oldid=441845046]  Removing sources should always undergo scrutiny.  Also I am not in favour of replacing primary sources with a tag (like <nowiki>{{fact}}<\/nowiki>) because 1) it leaves the claim with no support at all; and 2) it makes it harder to find a secondary source.  I brought up the topic on this page in order to (hopefully) clarify the guidelines: [[Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)\u200e]].  Thanks,  +++$+++ Please could you make it clear in your edit comments that you are removing primary sources as you did here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hypothyroidism&curid=65845&diff=441859037&oldid=441845046]  Removing sources should always undergo scrutiny.  Also I am not in favour of replacing primary sources with a tag (like <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki>) because 1) it leaves the claim with no support at all; and 2) it makes it harder to find a secondary source.  I brought up the topic on this page in order to (hopefully) clarify the guidelines: [[Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)‎]].  Thanks, [[User:Pgr94|pgr94]] ([[User talk:Pgr94|talk]]) 14:22, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
19474 +++$+++ Chris_Capoccia +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19473 +++$+++ 19473 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311892200E09 +++$+++ i would have thought that my comment in the fact tag \"don't list all dozen studies. find one or two reliable medical sources\" would have been sufficient. the previous text was original research \/ synthesis.&nbsp;&nbsp;\u2014 +++$+++ :i would have thought that my comment in the fact tag "don't list all dozen studies. find one or two reliable medical sources" would have been sufficient. the previous text was original research / synthesis.&nbsp;&nbsp;—[[User:Chris_Capoccia |Chris Capoccia]]  <sup>[[User talk:Chris_Capoccia|T]]</sup>&#8260;<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chris_Capoccia|C]]</sub> 15:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

19475 +++$+++ WhatamIdoing +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19475 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311890400E09 +++$+++ Can you tell me why you keep deleting most of the contents of the citations, e.g., [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Hypothyroidism&diff=441768843&oldid=441696043 here]?  Citations are supposed to be written out in full, not reduced to a doi number.   +++$+++ Can you tell me why you keep deleting most of the contents of the citations, e.g., [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hypothyroidism&diff=441768843&oldid=441696043 here]?  Citations are supposed to be written out in full, not reduced to a doi number.  [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 15:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
19476 +++$+++ Chris_Capoccia +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19475 +++$+++ 19475 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311891840E09 +++$+++ i am also forcing citation bot to run. so those edits are also part of my changes. i think you can see a general improvement in formatting and consistency in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Hypothyroidism&action=historysubmit&diff=441868138&oldid=439538481 this diff].&nbsp;&nbsp;\u2014 +++$+++ :i am also forcing citation bot to run. so those edits are also part of my changes. i think you can see a general improvement in formatting and consistency in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hypothyroidism&action=historysubmit&diff=441868138&oldid=439538481 this diff].&nbsp;&nbsp;—[[User:Chris_Capoccia |Chris Capoccia]]  <sup>[[User talk:Chris_Capoccia|T]]</sup>&#8260;<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chris_Capoccia|C]]</sub> 15:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
19477 +++$+++ Pgr94 +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19475 +++$+++ 19476 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.311894840E09 +++$+++ I thought <nowiki>{{cite doi}}<\/nowiki> already resulted in automatic completion of the citation.  I too am confused by your actions.  +++$+++ ::I thought <nowiki>{{cite doi}}</nowiki> already resulted in automatic completion of the citation.  I too am confused by your actions. [[User:Pgr94|pgr94]] ([[User talk:Pgr94|talk]]) 16:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
19478 +++$+++ Chris_Capoccia +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19475 +++$+++ 19477 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.311900120E09 +++$+++ if the whole article consistently used cite doi, i would have left everything that way. as it was, it was a mix of bare urls, different abbreviations and different formats.&nbsp;&nbsp;\u2014 +++$+++ :::if the whole article consistently used cite doi, i would have left everything that way. as it was, it was a mix of bare urls, different abbreviations and different formats.&nbsp;&nbsp;—[[User:Chris_Capoccia |Chris Capoccia]]  <sup>[[User talk:Chris_Capoccia|T]]</sup>&#8260;<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chris_Capoccia|C]]</sub> 17:42, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

281622 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281622 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.203184380E09 +++$+++ Noticed you've been holding the fort alone... again :) Thought I'd drop by and say hello. Surely your sanity has reached its limits by now?  +++$+++ Noticed you've been holding the fort alone... again :) Thought I'd drop by and say hello. Surely your sanity has reached its limits by now? [[User:Gamer Junkie|<font face="Papyrus" color="teal">'''Gamer Junkie'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">T</font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">C</font>]]</sup> 09:53, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
281623 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281622 +++$+++ 281622 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.203186120E09 +++$+++ I've been taking it easy here, so things are still a-okay :) But real life is driving me nuts, so it may be a good idea to let go of wiki-ing for a while, lol.  +++$+++ :I've been taking it easy here, so things are still a-okay :) But real life is driving me nuts, so it may be a good idea to let go of wiki-ing for a while, lol. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 10:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
281624 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281622 +++$+++ 281623 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.203196140E09 +++$+++ Ha, yeah that'd help. Good to see you're not a raving madman yet. By the way, I'm gonna try referencing some more of the DW article soon (slowly but surely, eh?) and I was wondering what we should do with [[Xing Cai]]'s article. Delete it entirely or what?  +++$+++ ::Ha, yeah that'd help. Good to see you're not a raving madman yet. By the way, I'm gonna try referencing some more of the DW article soon (slowly but surely, eh?) and I was wondering what we should do with [[Xing Cai]]'s article. Delete it entirely or what? [[User:Gamer Junkie|<font face="Papyrus" color="teal">'''Gamer Junkie'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">T</font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">C</font>]]</sup> 13:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
281625 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281622 +++$+++ 281624 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.203197880E09 +++$+++ I would redirect it to the dw character list.  +++$+++ :::I would redirect it to the dw character list. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 13:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
281626 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281622 +++$+++ 281625 +++$+++ 2008-02-17 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.203242520E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that's what I thought. Just wondering about consensus and all that, but it'll be a fairly redundant page once everything is transferred so it probably just be a technicality.  +++$+++ ::::Yeah, that's what I thought. Just wondering about consensus and all that, but it'll be a fairly redundant page once everything is transferred so it probably just be a technicality. [[User:Gamer Junkie|<font face="Papyrus" color="teal">'''Gamer Junkie'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">T</font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">C</font>]]</sup> 02:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

19479 +++$+++ Jebus989 +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19479 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-05 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312582800E09 +++$+++ I have to agree with the two above editors, having noticed [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=FourU_thermometer&diff=prev&oldid=438213485 this edit]. It's strange behaviour when the references are already full <nowiki>{{cite journal}}<\/nowiki> templates. You caught one stray external link but it's not necessary to strip every reference down to a doi and run a bot to fill them out again. It's now very difficult for me to check your changes without analysing every reference in detail. I third the request for you to stop doing this. Thanks ''' +++$+++ I have to agree with the two above editors, having noticed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FourU_thermometer&diff=prev&oldid=438213485 this edit]. It's strange behaviour when the references are already full <nowiki>{{cite journal}}</nowiki> templates. You caught one stray external link but it's not necessary to strip every reference down to a doi and run a bot to fill them out again. It's now very difficult for me to check your changes without analysing every reference in detail. I third the request for you to stop doing this. Thanks '''[[User:Jebus989|<font color=#000000>Jebus989</font>]][[User talk:Jebus989|<sup>✰</sup>]]''' 15:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
19480 +++$+++ Chris_Capoccia +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19479 +++$+++ 19479 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.312603380E09 +++$+++ the problem is not so much my edits (completing full names, journal titles, standardizing on pmid and doi instead of urls, etc.) as it is the piece of junk diff system on wikipedia that can't even reasonably manage simply adding\/removing an empty line. i do not have a history of vandalizing pages and citation bot is an approved bot for harmonizing and standardizing citation formats, so i fail to see what the problem is.&nbsp;&nbsp;\u2014 +++$+++ :the problem is not so much my edits (completing full names, journal titles, standardizing on pmid and doi instead of urls, etc.) as it is the piece of junk diff system on wikipedia that can't even reasonably manage simply adding/removing an empty line. i do not have a history of vandalizing pages and citation bot is an approved bot for harmonizing and standardizing citation formats, so i fail to see what the problem is.&nbsp;&nbsp;—[[User:Chris_Capoccia |Chris Capoccia]]  <sup>[[User talk:Chris_Capoccia|T]]</sup>&#8260;<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chris_Capoccia|C]]</sub> 21:03, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
19481 +++$+++ Jebus989 +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19479 +++$+++ 19480 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.312607160E09 +++$+++ I'm not calling you a vandal, you're just making a mess in the edit history without achieving anything (except perhaps expanding a straightforward author list into one formatted with |first2 |last2 ... ). I explained the problem, if I'm monitoring an article and trying to track your changes it becomes impossible when you've nearly wiped every reference on the page. If you see a missing field and just can't bear to leave it empty, by all means fill it in, or better yet use AWB to do it. I guess if you're not listening to the <s>two<\/s> three above complaints you won't be listening to mine either. ''' +++$+++ ::I'm not calling you a vandal, you're just making a mess in the edit history without achieving anything (except perhaps expanding a straightforward author list into one formatted with |first2 |last2 ... ). I explained the problem, if I'm monitoring an article and trying to track your changes it becomes impossible when you've nearly wiped every reference on the page. If you see a missing field and just can't bear to leave it empty, by all means fill it in, or better yet use AWB to do it. I guess if you're not listening to the <s>two</s> three above complaints you won't be listening to mine either. '''[[User:Jebus989|<font color=#000000>Jebus989</font>]][[User talk:Jebus989|<sup>✰</sup>]]''' 22:06, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
19482 +++$+++ Jebus989 +++$+++ Chris Capoccia +++$+++ 19479 +++$+++ 19480 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312607400E09 +++$+++ Actually your talk page archives is full of complaints, and you're being unreasonably persistent ''' +++$+++ ::Actually your talk page archives is full of complaints, and you're being unreasonably persistent '''[[User:Jebus989|<font color=#000000>Jebus989</font>]][[User talk:Jebus989|<sup>✰</sup>]]''' 22:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

543771 +++$+++ ClockworkSoul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543771 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.168846620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the SPAM, Tim. :) Good days and bad days, you know how it goes. I'm in the lab all day today, so I can't say it's necessarily bad... &ndash;  +++$+++ Thanks for the SPAM, Tim. :) Good days and bad days, you know how it goes. I'm in the lab all day today, so I can't say it's necessarily bad... &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 23:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
543772 +++$+++ ClockworkSoul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543771 +++$+++ 543771 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.168864080E09 +++$+++ At last, a way to keep my cats safe! Thanks again Tim! :) &ndash;  +++$+++ * At last, a way to keep my cats safe! Thanks again Tim! :) &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 04:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
543773 +++$+++ Kurtrik +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543771 +++$+++ 543771 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.168929180E09 +++$+++ I've revamped the vaccination section.  I fear I may have included too much history.  It is, in my opinion, relevant to how we've got to where we are today, but maybe not relevant for the general malaria article?  I don't know.  I won't be upset if it's changed\/eliminated in the future.  +++$+++ :I've revamped the vaccination section.  I fear I may have included too much history.  It is, in my opinion, relevant to how we've got to where we are today, but maybe not relevant for the general malaria article?  I don't know.  I won't be upset if it's changed/eliminated in the future. [[User:Kurtrik|Kurtrik]] 22:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

281628 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281628 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-23 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.206259620E09 +++$+++ Hey, dk. Sorry I haven't been round much. Currently focusing on getting one of my [[Bouncer (doorman)|old articles]] GA passed. Been monitoring the Three Kingdoms articles, though, and saw that [[User:Exiled Ambition]] is intent on returning the DW images that were removed. I've attempted to convince him otherwise, and after that didn't work, tried to convince him to use the free image character renders instead, but he doesn't want to know about it. Leave them or delete them?  +++$+++ Hey, dk. Sorry I haven't been round much. Currently focusing on getting one of my [[Bouncer (doorman)|old articles]] GA passed. Been monitoring the Three Kingdoms articles, though, and saw that [[User:Exiled Ambition]] is intent on returning the DW images that were removed. I've attempted to convince him otherwise, and after that didn't work, tried to convince him to use the free image character renders instead, but he doesn't want to know about it. Leave them or delete them? [[User:Gamer Junkie|<font face="Papyrus" color="teal">'''Gamer Junkie'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">T</font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">C</font>]]</sup> 01:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
281629 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281628 +++$+++ 281628 +++$+++ 2008-03-23 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.206296160E09 +++$+++ I'm lazy, so I'll leave it to the course of time. I don't necessary agree with his philosophy though.  +++$+++ :I'm lazy, so I'll leave it to the course of time. I don't necessary agree with his philosophy though. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 11:16, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
281630 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281628 +++$+++ 281629 +++$+++ 2008-03-23 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.206306000E09 +++$+++ Ha! I'm sure the course of time will go something along the lines of new DW character biographies to compliment the images, but okay. And yeah, his reasoning is crud, that's why I'm here. I'm not entirely against using non-free images, they're better than nothing at all, but since Koei released the free character renders to promote DW6, we should certainly be using them, if anything. As far as I'm concerned, there's not enough about DW left in the articles to warrant the use of non-free media. But it's not like I'm gonna take it up with some committee or something, so I guess the alternative is to let them go.  +++$+++ ::Ha! I'm sure the course of time will go something along the lines of new DW character biographies to compliment the images, but okay. And yeah, his reasoning is crud, that's why I'm here. I'm not entirely against using non-free images, they're better than nothing at all, but since Koei released the free character renders to promote DW6, we should certainly be using them, if anything. As far as I'm concerned, there's not enough about DW left in the articles to warrant the use of non-free media. But it's not like I'm gonna take it up with some committee or something, so I guess the alternative is to let them go. [[User:Gamer Junkie|<font face="Papyrus" color="teal">'''Gamer Junkie'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">T</font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">C</font>]]</sup> 14:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

19485 +++$+++ FClef +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-01 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.157122260E09 +++$+++ Dear Verica, Hi - I have reverted your recent Windsor Castle edit because [[Big Royal Dig]], which I created is now a  [[CAT:CSD]] at my urgent request.  I have moved the relevant material to the appropriate articles and now I  have blanked [[Big Royal Dig]].  It's a long story, but if you look at [[Talk:Time Team]], where there was a wounding Merge proposal to my sparkling new article, you'll see why.   I've had 2 days of utter grief with this.  If you are an administrator, please effect the deletion.  I am a keen contributor and utterly desperate at the position I've been put in.  (By the way, have you read Sarah Gristwood's brilliant biog. of Arbella Stuart?  it's great.)Thanks.  --  +++$+++ Dear Verica, Hi - I have reverted your recent Windsor Castle edit because [[Big Royal Dig]], which I created is now a  [[CAT:CSD]] at my urgent request.  I have moved the relevant material to the appropriate articles and now I  have blanked [[Big Royal Dig]].  It's a long story, but if you look at [[Talk:Time Team]], where there was a wounding Merge proposal to my sparkling new article, you'll see why.   I've had 2 days of utter grief with this.  If you are an administrator, please effect the deletion.  I am a keen contributor and utterly desperate at the position I've been put in.  (By the way, have you read Sarah Gristwood's brilliant biog. of Arbella Stuart?  it's great.)Thanks.  -- [[User:FClef|FClef]] [[User talk:FClef| (talk)]] 07:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
19486 +++$+++ FClef +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19485 +++$+++ 19485 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.157123940E09 +++$+++ Dear Verica, Hello again.  I'm happy to tell you that Big Royal Dig has now been deleted.  Please leave the material on the Windsor page.  I'm a happier bunny now.  :o)  --  +++$+++ :Dear Verica, Hello again.  I'm happy to tell you that Big Royal Dig has now been deleted.  Please leave the material on the Windsor page.  I'm a happier bunny now.  :o)  -- [[User:FClef|FClef]] [[User talk:FClef| (talk)]] 08:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
19487 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19485 +++$+++ 19486 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.157132220E09 +++$+++ I only deleted the paragaraph that was repeated twice in the [[Windsor Castle]] article. I didn't delete the Big Royal Dig section completely. I have now done this again.  +++$+++ ::I only deleted the paragaraph that was repeated twice in the [[Windsor Castle]] article. I didn't delete the Big Royal Dig section completely. I have now done this again. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 10:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
19488 +++$+++ FClef +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19485 +++$+++ 19487 +++$+++ 2006-09-01 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.157138400E09 +++$+++ Oops!  My fault - apologies.  I was so traumatised by the events of the last 2 days, and transferring material in haste when bleary-eyed this a.m., that I didn't notice that boob of mine.  Thanks. \u2013\u2013  +++$+++ :::Oops!  My fault - apologies.  I was so traumatised by the events of the last 2 days, and transferring material in haste when bleary-eyed this a.m., that I didn't notice that boob of mine.  Thanks. –– [[User:FClef|FClef]] [[User talk:FClef| (talk)]] 12:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

281631 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281631 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-26 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.206559560E09 +++$+++ Hope this helps.  +++$+++ Hope this helps. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk|talk]]) 12:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
281632 +++$+++ Ruakuu +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281631 +++$+++ 281631 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.206582120E09 +++$+++ Really good. They will go really well in the history section. The articles do mention about the dance, and the compilation album thats going to be released in April, but we are still looking for sources about the animation, if you could help on finding a japanese article about Popotan and Caramelldansen relation it will be most appreciated. Thanks fot your contribution.-- +++$+++ :Really good. They will go really well in the history section. The articles do mention about the dance, and the compilation album thats going to be released in April, but we are still looking for sources about the animation, if you could help on finding a japanese article about Popotan and Caramelldansen relation it will be most appreciated. Thanks fot your contribution.--[[User:Ruakuu|Ruakuu]] ([[User talk:Ruakuu|talk]]) 18:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

19489 +++$+++ Euchiasmus +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19489 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-02 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.157225520E09 +++$+++ Cheers -  +++$+++ Cheers - [[User:Euchiasmus|Euchiasmus]] 12:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
19490 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19489 +++$+++ 19489 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.157240400E09 +++$+++ As the photo in question had the credit on its own page, I didn't see that it was necessary to repeat this information under the Bracknell article. However, I have put it back as requested.  +++$+++ :As the photo in question had the credit on its own page, I didn't see that it was necessary to repeat this information under the Bracknell article. However, I have put it back as requested. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 16:40, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

281634 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281634 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-28 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.206734520E09 +++$+++ ..nice ta see ya.  +++$+++ ..nice ta see ya. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 13:02, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
281635 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281634 +++$+++ 281634 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.206734640E09 +++$+++ I was ''so'' not stalking you D=  +++$+++ :I was ''so'' not stalking you D= [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 13:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
281636 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281634 +++$+++ 281635 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.206734760E09 +++$+++ Dude, I've already started a thread with your name on it at [[WP:AN\/I]].  +++$+++ ::Dude, I've already started a thread with your name on it at [[WP:AN/I]]. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 13:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
281637 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281634 +++$+++ 281636 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.206734940E09 +++$+++ Please don't ban me, you evil cabal person :(  +++$+++ :::Please don't ban me, you evil cabal person :( [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 13:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

178011 +++$+++ Raintheone +++$+++ AcidBrights +++$+++ 178011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-19 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.300529760E09 +++$+++ I don't understand why you removed most of the info on him creating new families.. (I get that some was perhaps about the costello's) and the interview with Oruche from liverpool echo?? 7 refs is pretty dire seeings we stop everyone else from doing that. +++$+++ I don't understand why you removed most of the info on him creating new families.. (I get that some was perhaps about the costello's) and the interview with Oruche from liverpool echo?? 7 refs is pretty dire seeings we stop everyone else from doing that.[[User:Raintheone|'''<span style="color:red;font-family:Modern">RAIN*the*ONE</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Raintheone|<font color="#1020255">'''BAM'''</font>]]</sup> 03:16, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
178012 +++$+++ Raintheone +++$+++ AcidBrights +++$+++ 178011 +++$+++ 178011 +++$+++ 2011-03-19 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.300569060E09 +++$+++ I know that, it's better it doesn't have all that info copied from other pages. But the liverpool echo interview was useful. Also the info about Marquess creating the family and the stuff he said about them. They were created as a unit and I think that's been left out. +++$+++ :I know that, it's better it doesn't have all that info copied from other pages. But the liverpool echo interview was useful. Also the info about Marquess creating the family and the stuff he said about them. They were created as a unit and I think that's been left out.[[User:Raintheone|'''<span style="color:red;font-family:Modern">RAIN*the*ONE</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Raintheone|<font color="#1020255">'''BAM'''</font>]]</sup> 14:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

19493 +++$+++ Rodw +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.159153500E09 +++$+++ I see you've been tidying the categories on some of the SSSI articles I did from Berks to West Berks. Would you be kind enough to look at [[Locks on the Kennet and Avon Canal]] & check those for me as well. &mdash;  +++$+++ I see you've been tidying the categories on some of the SSSI articles I did from Berks to West Berks. Would you be kind enough to look at [[Locks on the Kennet and Avon Canal]] & check those for me as well. &mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 20:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
19494 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19493 +++$+++ 19493 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.159155300E09 +++$+++ No problem, Rod. I'll take a look when I get some time. BTW, I think [[Hampstead Lock]] should be [[Hamstead Lock]]. It's at [[Hamstead Marshall]] - no 'p' in the middle.  +++$+++ :No problem, Rod. I'll take a look when I get some time. BTW, I think [[Hampstead Lock]] should be [[Hamstead Lock]]. It's at [[Hamstead Marshall]] - no 'p' in the middle. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 20:35, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
19495 +++$+++ Rodw +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19493 +++$+++ 19494 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.159157220E09 +++$+++ Thanks (I don't know the geograpjhy of Berkshire very well & these are based on the [[Kennet and Avon Canal]] & realted bits I've been doing) & thank you for spotting my typo - I've checked back in my books & you are right so I've changed to [[Hamstead Lock]].&mdash;  +++$+++ ::Thanks (I don't know the geograpjhy of Berkshire very well & these are based on the [[Kennet and Avon Canal]] & realted bits I've been doing) & thank you for spotting my typo - I've checked back in my books & you are right so I've changed to [[Hamstead Lock]].&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

281638 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-28 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.206735480E09 +++$+++ (undent) Is it just me, or is [[:Image:Wikipe-tan in Cleopatra-style costume.png]] kinda ''hot''?  +++$+++ (undent) Is it just me, or is [[:Image:Wikipe-tan in Cleopatra-style costume.png]] kinda ''hot''? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 13:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
281639 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281638 +++$+++ 281638 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.206735780E09 +++$+++ Welcome to the club =D  +++$+++ :Welcome to the club =D [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 13:23, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
281640 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281638 +++$+++ 281638 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.206740880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ * [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 14:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
281641 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281638 +++$+++ 281638 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.206741180E09 +++$+++ man, thanks for giving me another time waster :(  +++$+++ :man, thanks for giving me another time waster :( [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 14:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

19496 +++$+++ Cornellier +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-03 12:33:00 +++$+++ 1.159903980E09 +++$+++ What's the rationale here? Are the Wikipedia guidelines on topic naming? I find it rather confusing that the topic name is not what is displayed in the URL field of the browser. How does one know how to link to the topic?  +++$+++ What's the rationale here? Are the Wikipedia guidelines on topic naming? I find it rather confusing that the topic name is not what is displayed in the URL field of the browser. How does one know how to link to the topic? [[User:Cornellier|Cornellier]] 12:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
19497 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19496 +++$+++ 19496 +++$+++ 2006-10-03 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.159916040E09 +++$+++ In the URL the spaces become underscores, the apostrophe is the %27 and the comma is the %2C. This is standard Wikipedia usage and should be understood by all browsers.  +++$+++ :In the URL the spaces become underscores, the apostrophe is the %27 and the comma is the %2C. This is standard Wikipedia usage and should be understood by all browsers. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 15:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
19498 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19496 +++$+++ 19496 +++$+++ 2006-10-09 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.160442660E09 +++$+++ My pleasure.  +++$+++ :My pleasure. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 18:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

281642 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-30 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.206883680E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Ling.Nut&diff=next&oldid=201864191 Somehow I don't believe you.] :(  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ling.Nut&diff=next&oldid=201864191 Somehow I don't believe you.] :( [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
281643 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281642 +++$+++ 281642 +++$+++ 2008-03-30 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.206884700E09 +++$+++ O YE OF LITTLE FAITH! :-)  +++$+++ :O YE OF LITTLE FAITH! :-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 06:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
281644 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281642 +++$+++ 281643 +++$+++ 2008-03-30 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.206894540E09 +++$+++ His Holiness Ling.Nut answers prayers, breaks promises! *gasp*  +++$+++ ::His Holiness Ling.Nut answers prayers, breaks promises! *gasp* [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 09:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

19499 +++$+++ Morwen +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-26 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.161906360E09 +++$+++ See, this is a clear textual similarity, one or two words have been changed, this is all.  This needs rephrasing not reverting.  Now, I rewrote this in my own words, without reference to the other text.  If this is itself too similar, we need to come up with even more different wording, rather than use text which is blatantly textually derived from the website.  +++$+++ See, this is a clear textual similarity, one or two words have been changed, this is all.  This needs rephrasing not reverting.  Now, I rewrote this in my own words, without reference to the other text.  If this is itself too similar, we need to come up with even more different wording, rather than use text which is blatantly textually derived from the website. [[User:Morwen|Morwen]] - [[User_talk:Morwen|Talk]] 16:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
19500 +++$+++ Morwen +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19499 +++$+++ 19499 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.161906840E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see now, that you did in fact alter the phrasing, whilst claiming in your edit comment that there was nothing wrong with the text as it stood.  Sorry, the wording at present can stand.   +++$+++ :Ah, I see now, that you did in fact alter the phrasing, whilst claiming in your edit comment that there was nothing wrong with the text as it stood.  Sorry, the wording at present can stand.  [[User:Morwen|Morwen]] - [[User_talk:Morwen|Talk]] 16:54, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
19501 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19499 +++$+++ 19499 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.163356140E09 +++$+++ Check out the [[Wikipedia:Naming_conventions#Lowercase second and subsequent words|Wikipedia naming conventions policy]], which explains the change of capitalization. I'm afraid I forgot to fix the double redirect which has probably added to your confusion. This is now done. Good split from [[Parish church]] BTW.  +++$+++ :Check out the [[Wikipedia:Naming_conventions#Lowercase second and subsequent words|Wikipedia naming conventions policy]], which explains the change of capitalization. I'm afraid I forgot to fix the double redirect which has probably added to your confusion. This is now done. Good split from [[Parish church]] BTW. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 10:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

281645 +++$+++ Juhachi +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-01 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.207038780E09 +++$+++ That's precisely why I'm so sure it's true. [[April 1]] is the beginning of the Japanese fiscal year, and I've noticed that important announcements are made on this date for this very reason. For example, [[MediaWorks (publisher)|MediaWorks]] is planned to merge with [[ASCII (company)|ASCII]] on April 1, and that's been announced since last September. Also, the second anime season of ''[[Shakugan no Shana]]'' was announced last year on April 1. See [[Japanese calendar#April 1]]. Not to mention that Key has announced a 10-year anniversary project since the end of February, so I'm not worried about it's validity.--<span style=\"background:white;color:\"> +++$+++ That's precisely why I'm so sure it's true. [[April 1]] is the beginning of the Japanese fiscal year, and I've noticed that important announcements are made on this date for this very reason. For example, [[MediaWorks (publisher)|MediaWorks]] is planned to merge with [[ASCII (company)|ASCII]] on April 1, and that's been announced since last September. Also, the second anime season of ''[[Shakugan no Shana]]'' was announced last year on April 1. See [[Japanese calendar#April 1]]. Not to mention that Key has announced a 10-year anniversary project since the end of February, so I'm not worried about it's validity.--<span style="background:white;color:">[[User:Juhachi|'''<font color="black">十</font>''']][[User talk:Juhachi|'''<font color="red">八</font>''']]</span> 01:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
281646 +++$+++ Juhachi +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281645 +++$+++ 281645 +++$+++ 2008-04-01 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.207040760E09 +++$+++ But notice how the blogger didn't put the Key announcement into the April Fool's blog post, but in another post entirely, plus he endorses Key as one not to fool around on April 1, and says they even announced the ''Clannad'' movie on April 1, 2006. I do realize that if anything is speculative, it'd be the scenario staff, but if it turns out fake, I'll just revert everything and put the article up for a speedy deletion.--<span style=\"background:white;color:\"> +++$+++ :But notice how the blogger didn't put the Key announcement into the April Fool's blog post, but in another post entirely, plus he endorses Key as one not to fool around on April 1, and says they even announced the ''Clannad'' movie on April 1, 2006. I do realize that if anything is speculative, it'd be the scenario staff, but if it turns out fake, I'll just revert everything and put the article up for a speedy deletion.--<span style="background:white;color:">[[User:Juhachi|'''<font color="black">十</font>''']][[User talk:Juhachi|'''<font color="red">八</font>''']]</span> 02:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
281647 +++$+++ Juhachi +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281645 +++$+++ 281646 +++$+++ 2008-04-01 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.207042020E09 +++$+++ I would like your opinion on this. Key\/Visual Art's has a copyright tag at the bottom of the official website for the game: http:\/\/key.visualarts.gr.jp\/rewrite\/rewrite.html. Would it be against the law to place a copyright tag on something that isn't actually copyrighted? As in, why would they go to the trouble to copyright the game if they weren't going to make it, unless they could do it without any ramifications, or any trouble.--<span style=\"background:white;color:\"> +++$+++ ::I would like your opinion on this. Key/Visual Art's has a copyright tag at the bottom of the official website for the game: http://key.visualarts.gr.jp/rewrite/rewrite.html. Would it be against the law to place a copyright tag on something that isn't actually copyrighted? As in, why would they go to the trouble to copyright the game if they weren't going to make it, unless they could do it without any ramifications, or any trouble.--<span style="background:white;color:">[[User:Juhachi|'''<font color="black">十</font>''']][[User talk:Juhachi|'''<font color="red">八</font>''']]</span> 02:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

19502 +++$+++ MRSC +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-19 11:53:00 +++$+++ 1.163965980E09 +++$+++ Since the introduction of the settlement sub-categories the people from\/natives of categories in general are a bit of a mess with inconsistency in how they are categorised. Where boundaries have changed, some have both the old and new county, some have the old, and some have the new. If the articles about people all get recategorised by settlement rather than by county it will become at least a little clearer.  +++$+++ Since the introduction of the settlement sub-categories the people from/natives of categories in general are a bit of a mess with inconsistency in how they are categorised. Where boundaries have changed, some have both the old and new county, some have the old, and some have the new. If the articles about people all get recategorised by settlement rather than by county it will become at least a little clearer. [[User:MRSC|MRSC]] • [[User_talk:MRSC|Talk]] 11:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
19503 +++$+++ MRSC +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19502 +++$+++ 19502 +++$+++ 2006-11-20 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.164038100E09 +++$+++ Yes. There is discussion about completely replacing \"People from...\" with \"Natives of...\" [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_geography#Categories_-_Natives_of.2FPeople_from|here]]. I'm definitely interested in your views on reducing the settlement categories down to major towns.  +++$+++ :Yes. There is discussion about completely replacing "People from..." with "Natives of..." [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_geography#Categories_-_Natives_of.2FPeople_from|here]]. I'm definitely interested in your views on reducing the settlement categories down to major towns. [[User:MRSC|MRSC]] • [[User_talk:MRSC|Talk]] 07:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
19504 +++$+++ 86.139.72.14 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19502 +++$+++ 19502 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.164293760E09 +++$+++ This Tad102 guy obviously doesn't understand Wikipedia. If he did, he would realise how ridiculous the phrase \"my article\" sounds!  +++$+++ :This Tad102 guy obviously doesn't understand Wikipedia. If he did, he would realise how ridiculous the phrase "my article" sounds! [[User:86.139.72.14|86.139.72.14]] 06:56, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
19505 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19502 +++$+++ 19504 +++$+++ 2006-11-23 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.164299340E09 +++$+++ You've said it all.  +++$+++ ::You've said it all. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 08:29, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

585495 +++$+++ InDeBiz1 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-07 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.210158000E09 +++$+++ Do you participate in the adoption process?  If so, I would be honored if you were to take me under your wing.  I feel that I have a decent grasp of the basics of Wikipedia, now it's time to expand my knowledge toward a hopefully successfull RfA in the future.  If you do not participate in the process, but might be willing to point me in the direction of someone who does that you trust, I would appreciate that, as well!   -- +++$+++ Do you participate in the adoption process?  If so, I would be honored if you were to take me under your wing.  I feel that I have a decent grasp of the basics of Wikipedia, now it's time to expand my knowledge toward a hopefully successfull RfA in the future.  If you do not participate in the process, but might be willing to point me in the direction of someone who does that you trust, I would appreciate that, as well!   --[[User:InDeBiz1|InDeBiz1]] ([[User talk:InDeBiz1|talk]]) 04:00, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
585496 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585495 +++$+++ 585495 +++$+++ 2008-05-07 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.210218540E09 +++$+++ No, I'm not involved with Adopt-a-user. However, one person who is in Adopt-a-user according to [[Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User\/Adoptee's Area\/Adopters]] is [[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|Dihydrogen Monoxide]]. He is not an admin, but he's a great Wikipedian, is very experienced, and has my trust: he might be willing to take you on. If he's not able to, I'm sure either he or I can suggest another person who might be able to adopt you. Even though I'm not part of Adopt-a-user, thank you for approaching me. :)  +++$+++ :No, I'm not involved with Adopt-a-user. However, one person who is in Adopt-a-user according to [[Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area/Adopters]] is [[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|Dihydrogen Monoxide]]. He is not an admin, but he's a great Wikipedian, is very experienced, and has my trust: he might be willing to take you on. If he's not able to, I'm sure either he or I can suggest another person who might be able to adopt you. Even though I'm not part of Adopt-a-user, thank you for approaching me. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
585497 +++$+++ InDeBiz1 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585495 +++$+++ 585496 +++$+++ 2008-05-07 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.210222200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your response.  I will approach him and see what he says!  -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for your response.  I will approach him and see what he says!  --[[User:InDeBiz1|InDeBiz1]] ([[User talk:InDeBiz1|talk]]) 21:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
585498 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585495 +++$+++ 585497 +++$+++ 2008-05-07 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.210222380E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome. :)  +++$+++ :::You're very welcome. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 21:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
585499 +++$+++ Dihydrogen Monoxide +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585495 +++$+++ 585498 +++$+++ 2008-05-08 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.210260600E09 +++$+++ *grins sheepishly* You make me blush, mate. '' +++$+++ :::: *grins sheepishly* You make me blush, mate. ''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|dihydrogen monoxide]]'' <small>([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|H<sub>2</sub>O]])</small> 08:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

19506 +++$+++ Princess Tiswas +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19506 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.164835560E09 +++$+++ Please read the [[WP:CSD|criteria for speedy deletion]] (specifically, articles #7) and [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|our general biography criteria]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn -->  -  +++$+++ Please read the [[WP:CSD|criteria for speedy deletion]] (specifically, articles #7) and [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|our general biography criteria]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn -->  - [[User:Princess Tiswas|<span style="color:#006400">Tiswas</span>]]<sup><span style="color:#FF0000">([[User talk:Princess Tiswas|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Princess Tiswas|c]])</span></sup> 13:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
19507 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19506 +++$+++ 19506 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.164836700E09 +++$+++ I have no interest in this article. I just moved the information off the [[Three Mile Cross]] village article. Sorry if I should have just deleted it.  +++$+++ :I have no interest in this article. I just moved the information off the [[Three Mile Cross]] village article. Sorry if I should have just deleted it. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 13:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
19508 +++$+++ Princess Tiswas +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19506 +++$+++ 19507 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.164837720E09 +++$+++ Hi - if this article was previously part of the article [[Three Mile Cross]], it makes sense to have moved it. I marked it for speedy delete as the original author has made no claims of notability for the band. -  +++$+++ ::Hi - if this article was previously part of the article [[Three Mile Cross]], it makes sense to have moved it. I marked it for speedy delete as the original author has made no claims of notability for the band. - [[User:Princess Tiswas|<span style="color:#006400">Tiswas</span>]]<sup><span style="color:#FF0000">([[User talk:Princess Tiswas|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Princess Tiswas|c]])</span></sup> 14:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

500490 +++$+++ Beve +++$+++ Mattythewhite +++$+++ 500490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-15 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.184564280E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Beve|Beve]] 22:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
500491 +++$+++ Beve +++$+++ Mattythewhite +++$+++ 500490 +++$+++ 500490 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.184598180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ : [[User:Beve|Beve]] 08:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
500492 +++$+++ Beve +++$+++ Mattythewhite +++$+++ 500490 +++$+++ 500491 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.184901960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Beve|Beve]] 20:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
500493 +++$+++ Beve +++$+++ Mattythewhite +++$+++ 500490 +++$+++ 500492 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.184903820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Beve|Beve]] 20:57, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

19509 +++$+++ MRSC +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19509 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-05 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.165332780E09 +++$+++ I've just realised the category scheme you have been using for Oxfordshire is towns instead of local government districts. We have been using districts elsewhere as they create larger, more viable geographic divisions as categories. Would you be interested in a move to district-based sub categories?  +++$+++ I've just realised the category scheme you have been using for Oxfordshire is towns instead of local government districts. We have been using districts elsewhere as they create larger, more viable geographic divisions as categories. Would you be interested in a move to district-based sub categories? [[User:MRSC|MRSC]] • [[User_talk:MRSC|Talk]] 07:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
19510 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19509 +++$+++ 19509 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.165336560E09 +++$+++ Are we still talking about 'People from...' categories? The only one I've created is 'People from Abingdon, Oxfordshire'. I think I based this on the Berkshire ones, 'People of Reading, Berkshire', 'People of Windsor, Berkshire', etc. Local government districts sounds sensible to me. That would ensure the whole country was covered. I can fix them if you like and put in a redirect. However, might these not be moving to 'Natives of...' anyway?  +++$+++ :Are we still talking about 'People from...' categories? The only one I've created is 'People from Abingdon, Oxfordshire'. I think I based this on the Berkshire ones, 'People of Reading, Berkshire', 'People of Windsor, Berkshire', etc. Local government districts sounds sensible to me. That would ensure the whole country was covered. I can fix them if you like and put in a redirect. However, might these not be moving to 'Natives of...' anyway? [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 08:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
19511 +++$+++ MRSC +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19509 +++$+++ 19510 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.165428000E09 +++$+++ Sorry crossed-wires. I meant the general categories such as [[:Category:Abingdon, Oxfordshire]] should be replaced with [[:Category:Vale of White Horse]] etc. The same applies for Berkshire which appears to currently be a mix of local government districts and towns. As for the ''Natives of...\/People from...'' I would not suggest re-aligning to local government districts as the historical application of current units would be problematic. However, I have been grouping the lowest level ''People from...'' categories by district using categories such as [[:Category:People from Vale of White Horse by settlement]] to fit in with a category scheme where the districts are the geographic divisions.  +++$+++ ::Sorry crossed-wires. I meant the general categories such as [[:Category:Abingdon, Oxfordshire]] should be replaced with [[:Category:Vale of White Horse]] etc. The same applies for Berkshire which appears to currently be a mix of local government districts and towns. As for the ''Natives of.../People from...'' I would not suggest re-aligning to local government districts as the historical application of current units would be problematic. However, I have been grouping the lowest level ''People from...'' categories by district using categories such as [[:Category:People from Vale of White Horse by settlement]] to fit in with a category scheme where the districts are the geographic divisions. [[User:MRSC|MRSC]] • [[User_talk:MRSC|Talk]] 10:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
19512 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19509 +++$+++ 19511 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.165429380E09 +++$+++ Sounds fine to me.  +++$+++ :::Sounds fine to me. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 10:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

281655 +++$+++ Collectonian +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-21 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.208781360E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Deadkid_dk}} this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags\/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 05:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. <small>Do you want to [[Template:Bots#Message notification opt out|opt out]] of receiving this notice?<\/small><!-- Template:Image source -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Deadkid_dk}} this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 05:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. <small>Do you want to [[Template:Bots#Message notification opt out|opt out]] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:Image source --> [[User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[User talk:Collectonian|talk]]) 05:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
281656 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281655 +++$+++ 281655 +++$+++ 2008-04-21 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.208785020E09 +++$+++ Too long ago, don't remember. Delete and repost at will.  +++$+++ :Too long ago, don't remember. Delete and repost at will. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:37, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
281657 +++$+++ Collectonian +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281655 +++$+++ 281656 +++$+++ 2008-04-21 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.208785320E09 +++$+++ Do you remember if its the poster or the DVD case? I can't tell for sure and the FUR mentions both.  +++$+++ ::Do you remember if its the poster or the DVD case? I can't tell for sure and the FUR mentions both. [[User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[User talk:Collectonian|talk]]) 06:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
281658 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281655 +++$+++ 281657 +++$+++ 2008-04-21 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.208791740E09 +++$+++ According to [http:\/\/www.amazon.co.jp\/%E3%81%BB%E3%81%97%E3%81%AE%E3%81%93%E3%81%88\/dp\/B0000992EC\/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1208766441&sr=8-4 Amazon] it should be the DVD cover, so the image I uploaded must have been the original art for the covers. Hope this helps.  +++$+++ :::According to [http://www.amazon.co.jp/%E3%81%BB%E3%81%97%E3%81%AE%E3%81%93%E3%81%88/dp/B0000992EC/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1208766441&sr=8-4 Amazon] it should be the DVD cover, so the image I uploaded must have been the original art for the covers. Hope this helps. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 08:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
281659 +++$+++ Collectonian +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281655 +++$+++ 281658 +++$+++ 2008-04-21 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.208813160E09 +++$+++ Cool, thanks :)  +++$+++ ::::Cool, thanks :) [[User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[User talk:Collectonian|talk]]) 14:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

19517 +++$+++ JLaTondre +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-25 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.172439960E09 +++$+++ There are actually two ways to sort articles within categories. The \"older\" way is to add the name to each category. Recently, they added the {{tl|DEFAULTSORT}} mechanism. Therefore, if you see an article with that template, you don't need to add the name to each category as you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Richard_Adams_%28author%29&diff=110794791&oldid=110628912 here]. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks. -- +++$+++ There are actually two ways to sort articles within categories. The "older" way is to add the name to each category. Recently, they added the {{tl|DEFAULTSORT}} mechanism. Therefore, if you see an article with that template, you don't need to add the name to each category as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Adams_%28author%29&diff=110794791&oldid=110628912 here]. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] 13:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
19518 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19517 +++$+++ 19517 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.172444280E09 +++$+++ Very useful. Thank you.  +++$+++ :Very useful. Thank you. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 14:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

19520 +++$+++ Victuallers +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19520 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-17 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.176822360E09 +++$+++ Thanks for change to Hugh de Grandmesnil - I am (It is) very short of refs for that article. Could you suggest one for your addition?  +++$+++ Thanks for change to Hugh de Grandmesnil - I am (It is) very short of refs for that article. Could you suggest one for your addition? [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] 08:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
19521 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19520 +++$+++ 19520 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.176991200E09 +++$+++ I only added a category  +++$+++ :I only added a category [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 07:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

440160 +++$+++ Ncmvocalist +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ 440160 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.312151640E09 +++$+++ I'm sure you could come up with something a little bit more useful under 'Conduct of administrators' (so that it is more relevant to the amended heading, if it is going to stay amended).  +++$+++ I'm sure you could come up with something a little bit more useful under 'Conduct of administrators' (so that it is more relevant to the amended heading, if it is going to stay amended). [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 15:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
440161 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ 440160 +++$+++ 440160 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.312151880E09 +++$+++ \"Conduct of administrators\" is what we've called that general paragraph in the past, and I don't see a need for a change, especially unless someone can think of something better. Of course, proposed principles 4 and 5 are not alternatives, and my expectation is that both will pass. In any event, though, Kirill Lokshin is the primary drafter on the case and he proposed 4, so you can ask him what he thinks if you really want to pursue this (which I don't think is really necessary). Regards,  +++$+++ :"Conduct of administrators" is what we've called that general paragraph in the past, and I don't see a need for a change, especially unless someone can think of something better. Of course, proposed principles 4 and 5 are not alternatives, and my expectation is that both will pass. In any event, though, Kirill Lokshin is the primary drafter on the case and he proposed 4, so you can ask him what he thinks if you really want to pursue this (which I don't think is really necessary). Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad#top|talk]]) 15:38, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
440162 +++$+++ Ncmvocalist +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ 440160 +++$+++ 440161 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.312152480E09 +++$+++ Well if the relevant section of admin policy is anything to go by, there are other important and relevant parts which would make more sense in the principle (rather than requiring other arbs to mention it in passing in their votes). But as I indicated, it's just a grumble. :)  +++$+++ ::Well if the relevant section of admin policy is anything to go by, there are other important and relevant parts which would make more sense in the principle (rather than requiring other arbs to mention it in passing in their votes). But as I indicated, it's just a grumble. :) [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 15:48, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
440163 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ 440160 +++$+++ 440162 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312152600E09 +++$+++ Perhaps a better answer from me would be that I think this case is (hopefully) too close to closing to warrant tinkering with the principle now. But please feel free to suggest alternative wording the next time this item comes up. Regards,  +++$+++ :::Perhaps a better answer from me would be that I think this case is (hopefully) too close to closing to warrant tinkering with the principle now. But please feel free to suggest alternative wording the next time this item comes up. Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad#top|talk]]) 15:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
440164 +++$+++ Ncmvocalist +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ 440160 +++$+++ 440163 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.312153320E09 +++$+++ It could have fitted into proposal 5 (seeing that was the spirit of it anyway), but meh. A response to your better answer would probably suggest that this drama should end soon, if it did not end as soon as it should and could have. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::::It could have fitted into proposal 5 (seeing that was the spirit of it anyway), but meh. A response to your better answer would probably suggest that this drama should end soon, if it did not end as soon as it should and could have. Cheers, [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 16:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
440165 +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ Newyorkbrad +++$+++ 440160 +++$+++ 440164 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.312192260E09 +++$+++ It's always good to end a conversation on a note of agreement. Fortunately, we can do so in this instance: I agree with you. Regards,  +++$+++ :::::It's always good to end a conversation on a note of agreement. Fortunately, we can do so in this instance: I agree with you. Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad#top|talk]]) 02:51, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

19522 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19522 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.176932160E09 +++$+++ I have changed your reference to the band being named after a location in Berkshire, to what I believe is correct (from other sources), that the band was named after the 1954 [[James Baldwin (writer)|James Baldwin]] play [[The Amen Corner]].  If you have any clear evidence that the band was named after the Berkshire location, please provide it.   +++$+++ I have changed your reference to the band being named after a location in Berkshire, to what I believe is correct (from other sources), that the band was named after the 1954 [[James Baldwin (writer)|James Baldwin]] play [[The Amen Corner]].  If you have any clear evidence that the band was named after the Berkshire location, please provide it.  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] 14:36, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
19523 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19522 +++$+++ 19522 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.176991200E09 +++$+++ That's what I'd always been told, but I don't have a reference. I believe one of the members owns the music shop at Amen Corner. Presumably he bought it because of the name, rather than the band actually being named after the place.  +++$+++ :That's what I'd always been told, but I don't have a reference. I believe one of the members owns the music shop at Amen Corner. Presumably he bought it because of the name, rather than the band actually being named after the place. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 07:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
19524 +++$+++ Ghmyrtle +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19522 +++$+++ 19523 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.177105860E09 +++$+++ Was the location called Amen Corner before he bought the shop there ? If not, perhaps the location is named after the shop rather than vice versa ?   +++$+++ ::Was the location called Amen Corner before he bought the shop there ? If not, perhaps the location is named after the shop rather than vice versa ?  [[User:Ghmyrtle|Ghmyrtle]] 14:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
19525 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19522 +++$+++ 19524 +++$+++ 2007-04-22 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.177293840E09 +++$+++ Yes, the name is at least a couple of hundred years old.  +++$+++ :::Yes, the name is at least a couple of hundred years old. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 19:04, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
19526 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19522 +++$+++ 19522 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.178635740E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid I can't move the history back, so if you don't agree with the move, you'll have to flag it for discussion.  +++$+++ :I'm afraid I can't move the history back, so if you don't agree with the move, you'll have to flag it for discussion. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 07:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

454560 +++$+++ Suhail spa +++$+++ Deb +++$+++ 454560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-09 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.304949480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Suhail spa|Suhail spa]] ([[User talk:Suhail spa|talk]]) 06:58, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
454561 +++$+++ Deb +++$+++ Deb +++$+++ 454560 +++$+++ 454560 +++$+++ 2011-05-09 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.304966160E09 +++$+++ I have answered here: [[User_talk:Suhail_spa\/Octane_Render]].  +++$+++ :I have answered here: [[User_talk:Suhail_spa/Octane_Render]]. [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb#top|talk]]) 11:36, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

19527 +++$+++ SP-KP +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-25 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.180096980E09 +++$+++ Hi - I wondered if you give me a little more background for your edit to this page - the citation sheet says that this site falls partly within Berkshire. Thanks  +++$+++ Hi - I wondered if you give me a little more background for your edit to this page - the citation sheet says that this site falls partly within Berkshire. Thanks [[User:SP-KP|SP-KP]] 05:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
19528 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19527 +++$+++ 19527 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 07:41:00 +++$+++ 1.180104060E09 +++$+++ According to the map on the [http:\/\/www.natureonthemap.org.uk\/map.aspx?m=sssi Nature on the Map] site, it is wholly on the Wiltshire site of the border. I don't know which is correct.  +++$+++ :According to the map on the [http://www.natureonthemap.org.uk/map.aspx?m=sssi Nature on the Map] site, it is wholly on the Wiltshire site of the border. I don't know which is correct. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] 07:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

543816 +++$+++ Pete.Hurd +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543816 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.172477160E09 +++$+++ Glad to hear that you find him useful to WP, but I think [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMichael_Johnson&diff=110788122&oldid=110573861 this] guy looks a whole lot like what Michael Johnson suggests he is.  +++$+++ Glad to hear that you find him useful to WP, but I think [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMichael_Johnson&diff=110788122&oldid=110573861 this] guy looks a whole lot like what Michael Johnson suggests he is. [[User:Pete.Hurd|Pete.Hurd]] 00:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
543817 +++$+++ Steptrip +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543816 +++$+++ 543816 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.172480460E09 +++$+++ <font family=\"Trebuchet MS\" color=\"#D2691E\"><b>~<\/b><\/font> +++$+++ :<font family="Trebuchet MS" color="#D2691E"><b>~</b></font>[[User:Steptrip|<font family="Trebuchet MS, sans-serif" color="#FF0000"><b>St</b></font><font family="Trebuchet MS, sans-serif" color="#FFD700"><b>ep</b></font>]][[User talk:Steptrip|<font family="Trebuchet MS, sans-serif" color="#7CFC00"><b>tr</b></font><font family="Trebuchet MS, sans-serif" color="#00FFFF"><b>ip</b></font>]] 01:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
543818 +++$+++ Steptrip +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543816 +++$+++ 543817 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.172481720E09 +++$+++ Thank's for the info (I patrol recent changes ca. every 3 days so I needed to know that for reporting trolls, vandals, etc. to AIV). <font family=\"Trebuchet MS\" color=\"#D2691E\"><b>~<\/b><\/font> +++$+++ ::Thank's for the info (I patrol recent changes ca. every 3 days so I needed to know that for reporting trolls, vandals, etc. to AIV). <font family="Trebuchet MS" color="#D2691E"><b>~</b></font>[[User:Steptrip|<font family="Trebuchet MS, sans-serif" color="#FF0000"><b>St</b></font><font family="Trebuchet MS, sans-serif" color="#FFD700"><b>ep</b></font>]][[User talk:Steptrip|<font family="Trebuchet MS, sans-serif" color="#7CFC00"><b>tr</b></font><font family="Trebuchet MS, sans-serif" color="#00FFFF"><b>ip</b></font>]] 01:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

574497 +++$+++ Anomo +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 574497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-07 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.162964580E09 +++$+++ I saw [[Blazing Saddles]] for the first time a day or so ago.  +++$+++ I saw [[Blazing Saddles]] for the first time a day or so ago. [[User:Anomo|Anomo]] 21:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
574498 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 574497 +++$+++ 574497 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.162965780E09 +++$+++ It's pretty average these days, but the jokes then were deliberately tailored to mock racism and well, Mongo was, for his brief few minutes in the picture, one of the highlights. I met [[Alex Karras]], the former NFL player who played the part of Mongo in that film. He's actually shorter than I am, but a lot wider.-- +++$+++ :It's pretty average these days, but the jokes then were deliberately tailored to mock racism and well, Mongo was, for his brief few minutes in the picture, one of the highlights. I met [[Alex Karras]], the former NFL player who played the part of Mongo in that film. He's actually shorter than I am, but a lot wider.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 22:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
574499 +++$+++ Anomo +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 574497 +++$+++ 574498 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.162965960E09 +++$+++ Until I put it in a few minutes ago, [[Alex Karras]] had no picture of him.  +++$+++ ::Until I put it in a few minutes ago, [[Alex Karras]] had no picture of him. [[User:Anomo|Anomo]] 22:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
574500 +++$+++ Doug Bell +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 574497 +++$+++ 574498 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.162966140E09 +++$+++ Blazing Saddles is on the short list of movies that had scenes I laughed so hard at that I almost hurt myself.  The movie as a whole might be pretty average, but a few of these scenes were hilarious\u2014like where Mongo knocks out the horse. \u2014 +++$+++ ::Blazing Saddles is on the short list of movies that had scenes I laughed so hard at that I almost hurt myself.  The movie as a whole might be pretty average, but a few of these scenes were hilarious—like where Mongo knocks out the horse. —[[User:Doug Bell|Doug&nbsp;Bell]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Doug Bell|talk]]'''•'''[[Special:Contributions/Doug Bell|contrib]]</sup> 22:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
574501 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 574497 +++$+++ 574500 +++$+++ 2006-11-07 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.162966320E09 +++$+++ Good job on the image Anomo...if it was free use, I'd tack it on my userpage...thanks. And the part in the movie I like the most is where the entire town is terrified of this Mongo character and the new sheriff asks Gene Wilder who Mongo is and Gene replies something like \"Mongo is more of a ''what'', than a ''who''.-- +++$+++ :::Good job on the image Anomo...if it was free use, I'd tack it on my userpage...thanks. And the part in the movie I like the most is where the entire town is terrified of this Mongo character and the new sheriff asks Gene Wilder who Mongo is and Gene replies something like "Mongo is more of a ''what'', than a ''who''.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 22:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

543822 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.172550960E09 +++$+++ Hi. The user has used other usernames and IPs to vandalize [[Shaolin Soccer]] using the same text. I really think he\/she should be blocked.  +++$+++ Hi. The user has used other usernames and IPs to vandalize [[Shaolin Soccer]] using the same text. I really think he/she should be blocked. [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Xiner|email]]) 20:36, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
543823 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543822 +++$+++ 543822 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.172551500E09 +++$+++ Ah yes, that's something that'd definitely help. Thank you. I still think the IP should be blocked though.  +++$+++ :Ah yes, that's something that'd definitely help. Thank you. I still think the IP should be blocked though. [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Xiner|email]]) 20:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
543824 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543822 +++$+++ 543823 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.172555340E09 +++$+++ Ok, thank you.  +++$+++ ::Ok, thank you. [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Xiner|email]]) 21:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

90637 +++$+++ JimmyButler +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90637 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-10 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.234310040E09 +++$+++ [[Talk:Introduction to evolution]] Hi. If you get a chance go to the talk page and scroll up to the section on Karen Carr Dinosaur image. Look for Angelina ! The flow of conversation is reminiscent of the good old days! I've made my case; although my confidence of being right is waning. TD was never a big supporter; especially during the FA phase so I'm not surprised that the allegation of \"slapping up a picture\" would be presented. I ask you... is the picture appropriate? I'm not so sure, am I blinded by my bias?  -- +++$+++ [[Talk:Introduction to evolution]] Hi. If you get a chance go to the talk page and scroll up to the section on Karen Carr Dinosaur image. Look for Angelina ! The flow of conversation is reminiscent of the good old days! I've made my case; although my confidence of being right is waning. TD was never a big supporter; especially during the FA phase so I'm not surprised that the allegation of "slapping up a picture" would be presented. I ask you... is the picture appropriate? I'm not so sure, am I blinded by my bias?  --[[User:JimmyButler|JimmyButler]] ([[User talk:JimmyButler|talk]]) 15:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
90638 +++$+++ Aunt Entropy +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ 90637 +++$+++ 90637 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.234312440E09 +++$+++ The NFCC image warriors have targeted the evolution and ID pages. Good luck with that...  +++$+++ :The NFCC image warriors have targeted the evolution and ID pages. Good luck with that... [[User:Aunt Entropy|Aunt Entropy]] ([[User talk:Aunt Entropy|talk]]) 16:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

19536 +++$+++ Chris j wood +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19536 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-27 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.225138740E09 +++$+++ Hi. Just a quick heads up. You have added templates to the three affected articles suggesting this merger, but not given reason for this merger on the appointed talk page. I think it would be unfortunate if this merger went through without a reason being put forward, so I have formally opposed the merger. I'm not necessarily against the merger, but I think it needs to be explained and discussed. Regards. --  +++$+++ Hi. Just a quick heads up. You have added templates to the three affected articles suggesting this merger, but not given reason for this merger on the appointed talk page. I think it would be unfortunate if this merger went through without a reason being put forward, so I have formally opposed the merger. I'm not necessarily against the merger, but I think it needs to be explained and discussed. Regards. -- [[User:Chris j wood|Chris j wood]] ([[User talk:Chris j wood|talk]]) 13:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
19537 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19536 +++$+++ 19536 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.225152960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reminder. All done now. It's not too late to change your vote!  +++$+++ :Thanks for the reminder. All done now. It's not too late to change your vote! [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] ([[User talk:Verica Atrebatum#top|talk]]) 17:16, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

543825 +++$+++ Essjay +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-25 07:46:00 +++$+++ 1.172418360E09 +++$+++ If you have questions, feel free to leave a talk page message for me or any other admin. Again, congratulations! <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ If you have questions, feel free to leave a talk page message for me or any other admin. Again, congratulations! <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Essjay|<font color="#7b68ee">'''Essjay'''</font>]] [[User talk:Essjay|<font color="#7b68ee">(<small>Talk</small>)</font>]]</span> 07:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
543826 +++$+++ LuciferMorgan +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.172428140E09 +++$+++ Congratulations - a well deserved success!  +++$+++ * Congratulations - a well deserved success! [[User:LuciferMorgan|LuciferMorgan]] 10:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
543827 +++$+++ BuickCenturyDriver +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.172428740E09 +++$+++ Good luck on becoming  an administrator.  +++$+++ * Good luck on becoming  an administrator. [[User:BuickCenturyDriver|BuickCenturyDriver]] ([[User_talk:BuickCenturyDriver|Honk]], [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username=BuickCenturyDriver&amp;site=en.wikipedia.org odometer]) 10:39, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
543828 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.172441520E09 +++$+++ Congratulations, Tim!  I hope it won't be too onerous for you, but I think we'll all benefit.  What is past is but prologue, and things done well, with a care, exempt themselves from fear.  With bardish good wishes,  +++$+++ * Congratulations, Tim!  I hope it won't be too onerous for you, but I think we'll all benefit.  What is past is but prologue, and things done well, with a care, exempt themselves from fear.  With bardish good wishes, [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 14:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
543829 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.172451960E09 +++$+++ Congrats, Tim. Much deserved and long overdue :) I'd have extended my congratulations sooner, but I'd somehow been unable to edit your Talk page. Now go forth and wield the Mop and Bucket!  +++$+++ *Congrats, Tim. Much deserved and long overdue :) I'd have extended my congratulations sooner, but I'd somehow been unable to edit your Talk page. Now go forth and wield the Mop and Bucket! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 17:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
543830 +++$+++ Opabinia regalis +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.172480040E09 +++$+++ Adding another to the list (and your message is making ''me'' blush). Glad to hand over a nice new set of cabal robes to the person who is one vote cooler than me ;) I'm anticipating a decrease in the rate of poopyheads and gay friends popping up on my watchlist....  +++$+++ * Adding another to the list (and your message is making ''me'' blush). Glad to hand over a nice new set of cabal robes to the person who is one vote cooler than me ;) I'm anticipating a decrease in the rate of poopyheads and gay friends popping up on my watchlist.... [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] 00:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
543831 +++$+++ Ashibaka +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.172485980E09 +++$+++ Thank you for considering my advice, and good luck with your admin work!  +++$+++ * Thank you for considering my advice, and good luck with your admin work! [[user:Ashibaka|Ashibaka]] [[user_talk:Ashibaka|(tock)]] 02:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
543832 +++$+++ Persian Poet Gal +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 543825 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.172639040E09 +++$+++ A belated congrats on becoming an admin!  You're doing an excellent job so far. +++$+++ *A belated congrats on becoming an admin!  You're doing an excellent job so far.[[User:Persian Poet Gal|<font face="comic sans ms"><font color="purple"><i><b>¤~Persian Poet Gal</b></i></font></font>]] <font color="purple">[[User talk:Persian Poet Gal|<sup>(talk)</sup>]]</font> 21:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

19538 +++$+++ Ironholds +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-13 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.226643600E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks for your contributions here :). Would you mind referencing them to conform with wiki-policy?  +++$+++ Hey, thanks for your contributions here :). Would you mind referencing them to conform with wiki-policy? [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 22:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
19539 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19538 +++$+++ 19538 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.226643960E09 +++$+++ I did, but I've added another one.  +++$+++ :I did, but I've added another one. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] ([[User talk:Verica Atrebatum#top|talk]]) 22:26, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

46947 +++$+++ Doma-w +++$+++ Djln +++$+++ 46947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-11 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.215830040E09 +++$+++ Hi David! Yes, I think this is a very good idea and it is also a very good consensus for all of us. Maybe it would be good to add a head to the Irish cats, like it was done for the German cats e.g.: [[:Category:Olympic competitors for West Germany]]. So nobody will be confused and it is show why this cat was created and how do use it. I addition I would like to ask you if you want to create a cat for all the Olympic medalists from Ireland which did not win their medals for Ireland? This was my idea one year ago with the \"Irish pre-1924 Olympic medalists\" but maybe you can call this cat \"Irish Olympic medalists\"? Many thanks for all and kind regards  +++$+++ Hi David! Yes, I think this is a very good idea and it is also a very good consensus for all of us. Maybe it would be good to add a head to the Irish cats, like it was done for the German cats e.g.: [[:Category:Olympic competitors for West Germany]]. So nobody will be confused and it is show why this cat was created and how do use it. I addition I would like to ask you if you want to create a cat for all the Olympic medalists from Ireland which did not win their medals for Ireland? This was my idea one year ago with the "Irish pre-1924 Olympic medalists" but maybe you can call this cat "Irish Olympic medalists"? Many thanks for all and kind regards [[User:Doma-w|Doma-w]] ([[User talk:Doma-w|talk]]) 19:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
46948 +++$+++ Doma-w +++$+++ Djln +++$+++ 46947 +++$+++ 46947 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.215831900E09 +++$+++ I have created today non-medalist [[John Barrett (athlete)]] :) and I have just created some more field hockey players. If you want I can forward all Irish competitors to you when I find some more? Kind regards  +++$+++ :I have created today non-medalist [[John Barrett (athlete)]] :) and I have just created some more field hockey players. If you want I can forward all Irish competitors to you when I find some more? Kind regards [[User:Doma-w|Doma-w]] ([[User talk:Doma-w|talk]]) 20:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
46949 +++$+++ Doma-w +++$+++ Djln +++$+++ 46947 +++$+++ 46948 +++$+++ 2008-07-11 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.215833460E09 +++$+++ It would be great if you can correct the term ''British Irish''. I do not want to insult anybody - but I am not a native speaker... :) Kind regards  +++$+++ ::It would be great if you can correct the term ''British Irish''. I do not want to insult anybody - but I am not a native speaker... :) Kind regards [[User:Doma-w|Doma-w]] ([[User talk:Doma-w|talk]]) 20:31, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

281685 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-09 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.215597660E09 +++$+++ Yes, I am well aware of the differences between the Western Gregorian and traditional Chinese calendar. For any Westerner such as myself who is knowledgeable in Chinese culture, who could forget that [[Chinese New Year]] celebration is not a simultaneous event with the New Year celebrated in [[Times Square]], New York. (Hah). However, with the sources I use (which are 90% Western), they go by the Gregorian count, and this is what I assume English readers at Wikipedia will be expecting to see when they refer to dates in articles; I think many Westerners are unaware when the Chinese New Year is and that the months don't match up with the Western calendar, and so should not be expected to be well-versed in both. If Stargate wants to include the ancient Chinese dating method by reign era alongside the Gregorian, that's fine, but lets stick to Gregorian for the main dates so that English (and in extension, Western) readers who come to Wikipedia can expect to see dates in the format they are most or solely familiar with. Thank you.--<strong> +++$+++ Yes, I am well aware of the differences between the Western Gregorian and traditional Chinese calendar. For any Westerner such as myself who is knowledgeable in Chinese culture, who could forget that [[Chinese New Year]] celebration is not a simultaneous event with the New Year celebrated in [[Times Square]], New York. (Hah). However, with the sources I use (which are 90% Western), they go by the Gregorian count, and this is what I assume English readers at Wikipedia will be expecting to see when they refer to dates in articles; I think many Westerners are unaware when the Chinese New Year is and that the months don't match up with the Western calendar, and so should not be expected to be well-versed in both. If Stargate wants to include the ancient Chinese dating method by reign era alongside the Gregorian, that's fine, but lets stick to Gregorian for the main dates so that English (and in extension, Western) readers who come to Wikipedia can expect to see dates in the format they are most or solely familiar with. Thank you.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 03:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
281686 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281685 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-09 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.215598080E09 +++$+++ About [[Kingdoms of the Han Dynasty]], you are correct. It rants on and on about the kings as people and never about the political unit of a kingdom. I would certainly not object your moving of the article's title.--<strong> +++$+++ ::About [[Kingdoms of the Han Dynasty]], you are correct. It rants on and on about the kings as people and never about the political unit of a kingdom. I would certainly not object your moving of the article's title.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 03:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
281687 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281685 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-09 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.215598140E09 +++$+++ Are you two causing trouble again? Don't make me come back there... :-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut|Nut]] <sup> +++$+++ :::Are you two causing trouble again? Don't make me come back there... :-) [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut|Nut]] <sup>[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|(WP:3IAR)]]</sup> 03:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

19544 +++$+++ Philip Baird Shearer +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-17 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.287381240E09 +++$+++ When you made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sir_John_St_John%2C_1st_Baronet&action=historysubmit&diff=391262042&oldid=391216474 this edit] to [[Sir John St John, 1st Baronet]] you included \"and [[Purley Park]] in [[Berkshire]]\" where does this information come from because AFAICT it is not in either of the cited sources. Please add a reliable citation or reply on the article talk page if you do not have a citation to hand or if I have misread the sources and indeed it is contained within them. --  +++$+++ When you made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sir_John_St_John%2C_1st_Baronet&action=historysubmit&diff=391262042&oldid=391216474 this edit] to [[Sir John St John, 1st Baronet]] you included "and [[Purley Park]] in [[Berkshire]]" where does this information come from because AFAICT it is not in either of the cited sources. Please add a reliable citation or reply on the article talk page if you do not have a citation to hand or if I have misread the sources and indeed it is contained within them. -- [[User:Philip Baird Shearer|PBS]] ([[User talk:Philip Baird Shearer|talk]]) 22:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
19545 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19544 +++$+++ 19544 +++$+++ 2010-10-20 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.287600480E09 +++$+++ Done  +++$+++ :Done [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] ([[User talk:Verica Atrebatum#top|talk]]) 11:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

281689 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-01 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.217622540E09 +++$+++ You know, I was thinking about that, and the larger number is actually the one we had when it went to FAC. You can look on the ArticleHist template on TALK... did we find a different source? I am old and my memory fails. By the way, why was I writing to you...? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut|Nut]] <sup> +++$+++ You know, I was thinking about that, and the larger number is actually the one we had when it went to FAC. You can look on the ArticleHist template on TALK... did we find a different source? I am old and my memory fails. By the way, why was I writing to you...? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut|Nut]] <sup>[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|(WP:3IAR)]]</sup> 13:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
281690 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281689 +++$+++ 281689 +++$+++ 2008-08-01 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.217622960E09 +++$+++ Uh, it's been \"220,000\u2013240,000\" all the time? At least that's what I see from here.  +++$+++ :Uh, it's been "220,000–240,000" all the time? At least that's what I see from here. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 13:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
281691 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281689 +++$+++ 281690 +++$+++ 2008-08-01 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.217623200E09 +++$+++ Oh, I got confused! I was reading the diffs backwards. Never mind me... I'll just drink some prune juice and have a nice nap... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut|Nut]] <sup> +++$+++ ::Oh, I got confused! I was reading the diffs backwards. Never mind me... I'll just drink some prune juice and have a nice nap... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut|Nut]] <sup>[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|(WP:3IAR)]]</sup> 13:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

19547 +++$+++ JohnArmagh +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-25 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.309018080E09 +++$+++ I am currently re-thinking the issue of granges - I intend to make the inclusion on the same basis as that of hospitals and exclude any which did not function at one time as a monastery.  I am currently going through each monastic establishment, county by county using Hadcock & Knowles Medieval Religious Houses, which is a very lengthy process.  +++$+++ I am currently re-thinking the issue of granges - I intend to make the inclusion on the same basis as that of hospitals and exclude any which did not function at one time as a monastery.  I am currently going through each monastic establishment, county by county using Hadcock & Knowles Medieval Religious Houses, which is a very lengthy process. [[User:JohnArmagh|JohnArmagh]] ([[User talk:JohnArmagh|talk]]) 09:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
19548 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19547 +++$+++ 19547 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.309018320E09 +++$+++ Sounds good to me, John. Would you like me to extract the Berkshire\/Oxfordshire granges on that basis? - that's where my interest lies.  +++$+++ :Sounds good to me, John. Would you like me to extract the Berkshire/Oxfordshire granges on that basis? - that's where my interest lies. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] ([[User talk:Verica Atrebatum#top|talk]]) 09:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
19549 +++$+++ JohnArmagh +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19547 +++$+++ 19548 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.309022460E09 +++$+++ By all means, feel free.  (btw, I hope I don't offend, but I have put Bradley back, on the basis of the info from Knowles and Hadcock, and included a link to the online VCH - but I have unlinked the name on the basis that there is sufficient doubt about the nature of the establishment as to warrant an article on it to be unnecessary)  +++$+++ ::By all means, feel free.  (btw, I hope I don't offend, but I have put Bradley back, on the basis of the info from Knowles and Hadcock, and included a link to the online VCH - but I have unlinked the name on the basis that there is sufficient doubt about the nature of the establishment as to warrant an article on it to be unnecessary) [[User:JohnArmagh|JohnArmagh]] ([[User talk:JohnArmagh|talk]]) 10:21, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
19550 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19547 +++$+++ 19547 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.309062420E09 +++$+++ Done +++$+++ :Done[[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] ([[User talk:Verica Atrebatum#top|talk]]) 21:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
19551 +++$+++ Ironholds +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19547 +++$+++ 19550 +++$+++ 2011-06-25 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309062840E09 +++$+++ Brilliant; Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Brilliant; Thanks! [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 21:34, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

281692 +++$+++ Simpletranslate +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-12 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.218578940E09 +++$+++ thx.-- +++$+++ thx.--[[User:Simpletranslate|Simpletranslate]] ([[User talk:Simpletranslate|talk]]) 15:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
281693 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281692 +++$+++ 281692 +++$+++ 2008-08-12 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.218579240E09 +++$+++ Read my edit summary, I provided ample reason.  +++$+++ :Read my edit summary, I provided ample reason. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 15:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
281694 +++$+++ Simpletranslate +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281692 +++$+++ 281693 +++$+++ 2008-08-12 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.218579240E09 +++$+++ I don't agree with you.-- +++$+++ ::I don't agree with you.--[[User:Simpletranslate|Simpletranslate]] ([[User talk:Simpletranslate|talk]]) 15:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
281695 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281692 +++$+++ 281694 +++$+++ 2008-08-12 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.218579360E09 +++$+++ Is there a need to repeat the same thing twice?  +++$+++ :::Is there a need to repeat the same thing twice? [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 15:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

527546 +++$+++ Steptrip +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527546 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-25 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.174888200E09 +++$+++ Are you just substituting that message? I've seen it on innumerable talk pages now. &nbsp;<b>[[Wikipedia:Editor review\/Steptrip_2|<font family=\"Trebuchet MS\" color=\"#D2691E\" size=\"2\">''~''<\/font>]]<font face=\"Vivaldi\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ Are you just substituting that message? I've seen it on innumerable talk pages now. &nbsp;<b>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Steptrip_2|<font family="Trebuchet MS" color="#D2691E" size="2">''~''</font>]]<font face="Vivaldi" size="3">[[User:Steptrip|<font color="#FF0000">St</font><font color="#FFD700">ep</font>]][[User talk:Steptrip|<font color="#7CFC00">tr</font><font color="#00FFFF">ip</font>]]</font></b> 22:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
527547 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527546 +++$+++ 527546 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.174888980E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't be surprised if he was substituting the message. A lot of people do that to save time. \/\/  +++$+++ :I wouldn't be surprised if he was substituting the message. A lot of people do that to save time. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 23:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
527548 +++$+++ Steptrip +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527546 +++$+++ 527546 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.174890600E09 +++$+++ Okay, just wanted to make sure he \/ she wasn't spamming or anything (like an admin would, but you never know ...). &nbsp;<b>[[Wikipedia:Editor review\/Steptrip_2|<font family=\"Trebuchet MS\" color=\"#D2691E\" size=\"2\">''~''<\/font>]]<font face=\"Vivaldi\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ :Okay, just wanted to make sure he / she wasn't spamming or anything (like an admin would, but you never know ...). &nbsp;<b>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Steptrip_2|<font family="Trebuchet MS" color="#D2691E" size="2">''~''</font>]]<font face="Vivaldi" size="3">[[User:Steptrip|<font color="#FF0000">St</font><font color="#FFD700">ep</font>]][[User talk:Steptrip|<font color="#7CFC00">tr</font><font color="#00FFFF">ip</font>]]</font></b> 23:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
527549 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527546 +++$+++ 527548 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.174890720E09 +++$+++ Yes, those 'personalized' responses have been popular forever. Well at least since 15:26, 23 September 2005, when I made my first edit <tt>:)<\/tt>.  +++$+++ ::Yes, those 'personalized' responses have been popular forever. Well at least since 15:26, 23 September 2005, when I made my first edit <tt>:)</tt>. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 23:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
527550 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527546 +++$+++ 527546 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.174900680E09 +++$+++ Congratulations! (and I don't mind 'personalised' message :) ) &ndash; <span style=\"font-family:trebuchet ms\"> +++$+++ :Congratulations! (and I don't mind 'personalised' message :) ) &ndash; <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">[[User:Riana|Riana]] <sup>[[User talk:Riana|<font color="seagreen"><big>talk</big></font>]]</sup></span> 02:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

543838 +++$+++ Marcus334 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543838 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-28 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.172706780E09 +++$+++ Any comment, contribution or edit you may have on this [[Geneticist]] biography article would be appreciated. Thanks.-- +++$+++ Any comment, contribution or edit you may have on this [[Geneticist]] biography article would be appreciated. Thanks.--[[User:Marcus334|Marcus]] 15:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
543839 +++$+++ Marcus334 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543838 +++$+++ 543838 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.172735280E09 +++$+++ Tim, Thanks for looking. I think the article needs more science than just a link to some of his research reports. Genetics is beyond me.- +++$+++ *Tim, Thanks for looking. I think the article needs more science than just a link to some of his research reports. Genetics is beyond me.-[[User:Marcus334|Marcus]] 23:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

19552 +++$+++ Stfg +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 08:08:00 +++$+++ 1.310137680E09 +++$+++ Regards, -- +++$+++ Regards, --[[User:Stfg|Stfg]] ([[User talk:Stfg|talk]]) 08:08, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
19553 +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ Verica Atrebatum +++$+++ 19552 +++$+++ 19552 +++$+++ 2011-07-11 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.310414040E09 +++$+++ It seems a bit dumb, but the VCH seems to concur, so I have no particular objection.  +++$+++ :It seems a bit dumb, but the VCH seems to concur, so I have no particular objection. [[User:Verica Atrebatum|Verica Atrebatum]] ([[User talk:Verica Atrebatum#top|talk]]) 12:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

281697 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281697 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-28 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.219945260E09 +++$+++ Wanna try sending [[Guan Yu]] through [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Featured articles\/FA-Team\/Mission Proposals]]? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut|Nut]] <sup> +++$+++ Wanna try sending [[Guan Yu]] through [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Featured articles/FA-Team/Mission Proposals]]? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut|Nut]] <sup>[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|(WP:3IAR)]]</sup> 10:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
281698 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281697 +++$+++ 281697 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.219946940E09 +++$+++ Sourcing is a problem with the Guan Yu article, but I don't think the FA-team can help us with that, lol... +++$+++ :Sourcing is a problem with the Guan Yu article, but I don't think the FA-team can help us with that, lol...[[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 11:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
281699 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281697 +++$+++ 281698 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 11:12:00 +++$+++ 1.219947120E09 +++$+++ OK. It was a thought. Any other ideas? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut|Nut]] <sup> +++$+++ ::OK. It was a thought. Any other ideas? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut|Nut]] <sup>[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|(WP:3IAR)]]</sup> 11:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
281700 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281697 +++$+++ 281699 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 11:17:00 +++$+++ 1.219947420E09 +++$+++ Hmm, not that I can think of. I don't feel like making extensive articles lately for some reason (as you can probably tell by my lack of activity)...must be the summer heat.  +++$+++ :::Hmm, not that I can think of. I don't feel like making extensive articles lately for some reason (as you can probably tell by my lack of activity)...must be the summer heat. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 11:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
281701 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281697 +++$+++ 281700 +++$+++ 2008-08-28 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.219947720E09 +++$+++ Summer heat? Did you say summer heat? Taiwan has no summer heat. Nope, none at all. Nosiree bob. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut|Nut]] <sup> +++$+++ ::::Summer heat? Did you say summer heat? Taiwan has no summer heat. Nope, none at all. Nosiree bob. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling]].[[User talk:Ling.Nut|Nut]] <sup>[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|(WP:3IAR)]]</sup> 11:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

19554 +++$+++ Bcperson89 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-18 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.292665740E09 +++$+++ An endash is similar to a hyphen, except an endash is slightly longer than a hyphen, and shorter than an emdash. I just find the [[Template:Ndash]] is a simple way of producing the endash that can be used in date ranges.  +++$+++ An endash is similar to a hyphen, except an endash is slightly longer than a hyphen, and shorter than an emdash. I just find the [[Template:Ndash]] is a simple way of producing the endash that can be used in date ranges. [[User:Bcperson89|Bcperson89]] ([[User talk:Bcperson89|talk]]) 01:49, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
19555 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19554 +++$+++ 19554 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.292667180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your prompt reply. I should have pointed out that the first sign I mentioned, \u2013, is not produced by typing a hyphen (which is indeed even shorter: -) but comes from clicking on it in the Insert section beneath the editing pane: \u2013, and looks to me just like an endash, which I type with the ampersand-ndash-semicolon code: &ndash; (again: \u2013 &ndash; ). But to you it looks like a hyphen?  +++$+++ :Thanks for your prompt reply. I should have pointed out that the first sign I mentioned, –, is not produced by typing a hyphen (which is indeed even shorter: -) but comes from clicking on it in the Insert section beneath the editing pane: –, and looks to me just like an endash, which I type with the ampersand-ndash-semicolon code: &ndash; (again: – &ndash; ). But to you it looks like a hyphen? [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 02:13, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

19556 +++$+++ 217.28.3.166 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-20 08:09:00 +++$+++ 1.292861340E09 +++$+++ Regards &mdash;[[Special:Contributions\/217.28.3.166|217.28.3.166]] ( +++$+++ Regards &mdash;[[Special:Contributions/217.28.3.166|217.28.3.166]] ([[User talk:217.28.3.166|talk]]) 08:09, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
19557 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19556 +++$+++ 19556 +++$+++ 2010-12-20 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.292890620E09 +++$+++ Perhaps you'd care to explain why you regard [[Actor]]\/[[Comedian]] as an improvement on [[Actor]], [[comedian]]. But I was a little hasty: some of your changes were okay. You ought to read the [[jobsworth]] article again: I've made some changes to clarify the definition.  +++$+++ :Perhaps you'd care to explain why you regard [[Actor]]/[[Comedian]] as an improvement on [[Actor]], [[comedian]]. But I was a little hasty: some of your changes were okay. You ought to read the [[jobsworth]] article again: I've made some changes to clarify the definition. [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 16:17, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
19558 +++$+++ 217.28.3.166 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19556 +++$+++ 19557 +++$+++ 2010-12-20 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.292899740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for understanding and sorry for the insult :), by the way your changes to \"Jobsworth\" were needed \u2014[[Special:Contributions\/217.28.3.166|217.28.3.166]] ( +++$+++ ::Thanks for understanding and sorry for the insult :), by the way your changes to "Jobsworth" were needed —[[Special:Contributions/217.28.3.166|217.28.3.166]] ([[User talk:217.28.3.166|talk]]) 18:49, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

543845 +++$+++ David D. +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-13 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.171414020E09 +++$+++ Hey Tim, did you ever consider [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:TimVickers\/archive_2&diff=prev&oldid=83448056 this comment] that i made a while back.  Now located [http:\/\/pilot.citizendium.org\/wiki\/Main_Page here]. Might be right up your street. You too Opabinia regalis and Willow.  +++$+++ Hey Tim, did you ever consider [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TimVickers/archive_2&diff=prev&oldid=83448056 this comment] that i made a while back.  Now located [http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki/Main_Page here]. Might be right up your street. You too Opabinia regalis and Willow. [[User:David D.|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.|(Talk)]] 16:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
543846 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543845 +++$+++ 543845 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.172879280E09 +++$+++ Perhaps more importantly, I'm glad that Wikipedia is so open, although I mourn the loss of good people's time.  For me, it's a good, even thrilling, spiritual exercise to be unafraid, to be open and giving and trusting.  It's practical, too; my own ideas and explanations have improved from being challenged by others, even on matters that I kind of know.  It does take a lot of time and patience, sympathy and gentleness, to win over some people who are adamantly misguided and who see correction as humiliation; but knowing myself to be so full of error, it's easy to summon up compassion.  +++$+++ : Perhaps more importantly, I'm glad that Wikipedia is so open, although I mourn the loss of good people's time.  For me, it's a good, even thrilling, spiritual exercise to be unafraid, to be open and giving and trusting.  It's practical, too; my own ideas and explanations have improved from being challenged by others, even on matters that I kind of know.  It does take a lot of time and patience, sympathy and gentleness, to win over some people who are adamantly misguided and who see correction as humiliation; but knowing myself to be so full of error, it's easy to summon up compassion. [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 15:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

19559 +++$+++ Masterknighted +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-23 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.293096420E09 +++$+++ Dearest Rothorpe no Beefheart though your ciriculum vitae of copywriting is extensive and probably unparalled in the Online English speaking universe and despite the fact that I made a couple of boo-boo's which also needed to be removed \"these were\" whether the musicians are implicit or not in the previous line does not read well. \"Drawn from\" would also sound better.  I bet you are a Spartan minimalist. +++$+++ Dearest Rothorpe no Beefheart though your ciriculum vitae of copywriting is extensive and probably unparalled in the Online English speaking universe and despite the fact that I made a couple of boo-boo's which also needed to be removed "these were" whether the musicians are implicit or not in the previous line does not read well. "Drawn from" would also sound better.  I bet you are a Spartan minimalist.[[User:Masterknighted|Masterknighted]] ([[User talk:Masterknighted|talk]]) 01:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
19560 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19559 +++$+++ 19559 +++$+++ 2010-12-23 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.293096960E09 +++$+++ Read it again tomorrow, and you'll see that it is now perfect. Less is more!  +++$+++ :Read it again tomorrow, and you'll see that it is now perfect. Less is more! [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 01:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

19561 +++$+++ 207.161.207.162 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19561 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-21 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.295603940E09 +++$+++ \"regard\" is fine with me.  I hope it doesn't get changed back to \"recognize\" again.  Regards, [[Special:Contributions\/207.161.207.162|207.161.207.162]] ( +++$+++ "regard" is fine with me.  I hope it doesn't get changed back to "recognize" again.  Regards, [[Special:Contributions/207.161.207.162|207.161.207.162]] ([[User talk:207.161.207.162|talk]]) 01:59, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
19562 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19561 +++$+++ 19561 +++$+++ 2011-01-21 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.295605680E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 02:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

281709 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281709 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-24 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.222258920E09 +++$+++ ...did I mention '''[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Three Kingdoms#Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Three Kingdoms|this]]'''? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ ...did I mention '''[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Three Kingdoms#Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Three Kingdoms|this]]'''? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 05:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
281710 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281709 +++$+++ 281709 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.222259880E09 +++$+++ I am not familiar with this....Are the articles selected based their importance, quality, or both? Because if it's only about importance, I'm okay with the list (maybe swap Dong Zhuo for Yuan Shao); but if it's for quality also, then perhaps only three or four articles can go on there.  +++$+++ :I am not familiar with this....Are the articles selected based their importance, quality, or both? Because if it's only about importance, I'm okay with the list (maybe swap Dong Zhuo for Yuan Shao); but if it's for quality also, then perhaps only three or four articles can go on there. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 05:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
281711 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281709 +++$+++ 281710 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.222260120E09 +++$+++ FAs go on the list automatically. Others are selected by a bot script that takes into account importance (as defined by the wikiproject), rating (FA\/A\/GA etc.) and page views (as a measure of popularity). We're supposed to fix them up by October 20th, though we can ask for changes to the list if we want (swap or remove articles)... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ ::FAs go on the list automatically. Others are selected by a bot script that takes into account importance (as defined by the wikiproject), rating (FA/A/GA etc.) and page views (as a measure of popularity). We're supposed to fix them up by October 20th, though we can ask for changes to the list if we want (swap or remove articles)... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 05:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
281712 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281709 +++$+++ 281711 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 05:53:00 +++$+++ 1.222260780E09 +++$+++ Well, fixing them is out of the question for me, as I have neither the heart nor the time at the moment. (What a thing for a project starting member to say!) Sometimes I wish we had more able hands in this Wikiproject.  +++$+++ :::Well, fixing them is out of the question for me, as I have neither the heart nor the time at the moment. (What a thing for a project starting member to say!) Sometimes I wish we had more able hands in this Wikiproject. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 05:53, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
281713 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281709 +++$+++ 281712 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.222261740E09 +++$+++ I plan to at least attempt a fix. Would you recommend different articles, based on quality or importance (or preferably some combination of the two)...? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ ::::I plan to at least attempt a fix. Would you recommend different articles, based on quality or importance (or preferably some combination of the two)...? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 06:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
281714 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281709 +++$+++ 281713 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 06:41:00 +++$+++ 1.222263660E09 +++$+++ I suggest removing Zhang Fei and Dong Zhuo, and add Yuan Shao and Records of the Three Kingdoms.  +++$+++ :::::I suggest removing Zhang Fei and Dong Zhuo, and add Yuan Shao and Records of the Three Kingdoms. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

19566 +++$+++ Zarcadia +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.296200460E09 +++$+++ Hello, I see you reverted my edit. I suppose you're right as he was only a British subject for a year even though he spent a large portion of his life there. Just wanted to say thanks for the 'good faith' mention in your revert, that goes a long way here in Wikipedia, some people revert without the good manners to explain why or accept that the previous editor was trying to improve the project. Have a good day!  +++$+++ Hello, I see you reverted my edit. I suppose you're right as he was only a British subject for a year even though he spent a large portion of his life there. Just wanted to say thanks for the 'good faith' mention in your revert, that goes a long way here in Wikipedia, some people revert without the good manners to explain why or accept that the previous editor was trying to improve the project. Have a good day! [[User:Zarcadia|Zarcadia]] ([[User talk:Zarcadia|talk]]) 23:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
19567 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19566 +++$+++ 19566 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.296201540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking the trouble to mention that. Glad you agree about James. Have a good day, too.  +++$+++ :Thanks for taking the trouble to mention that. Glad you agree about James. Have a good day, too. [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 23:59, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

19568 +++$+++ Jrcoxhead +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-31 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.296540480E09 +++$+++ I fixed a typo in the name of this Molesworth character. Why did you unfix it? I'm afraid I don't have the book here, or I could send you a screen shot; but here's a blog article where someone gets it right: \"http:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/317\/7174\/1720.2.extract\". Please restore my fix asap! Thanks, ---  +++$+++ I fixed a typo in the name of this Molesworth character. Why did you unfix it? I'm afraid I don't have the book here, or I could send you a screen shot; but here's a blog article where someone gets it right: "http://www.bmj.com/content/317/7174/1720.2.extract". Please restore my fix asap! Thanks, --- [[User:Jrcoxhead|Jrcoxhead]] ([[User talk:Jrcoxhead|talk]]) 22:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
19569 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19568 +++$+++ 19568 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.296543300E09 +++$+++ Don't believe blogs. Wikipedia is infallible, [[Fotherington-Thomas|as any fule kno.]]  +++$+++ :Don't believe blogs. Wikipedia is infallible, [[Fotherington-Thomas|as any fule kno.]] [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 22:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
19570 +++$+++ Jrcoxhead +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19568 +++$+++ 19568 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.296626100E09 +++$+++ I don't believe blogs. I have the books---they were great favorites of mine as a child. The character's name was Fothering-Thomas! If you have a source for your assertion, please cite it; if not, you'll have to believe me. +++$+++ :I don't believe blogs. I have the books---they were great favorites of mine as a child. The character's name was Fothering-Thomas! If you have a source for your assertion, please cite it; if not, you'll have to believe me.[[User:Jrcoxhead|Jrcoxhead]] ([[User talk:Jrcoxhead|talk]]) 21:55, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
19571 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19568 +++$+++ 19570 +++$+++ 2011-02-01 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.296629640E09 +++$+++ Here's one from the BBC, which turned up on the first page when I googled: [http:\/\/bbc.co.uk\/dna\/h2g2\/A245620] - see the 2nd para. I notice you don't say you have the books open in front of you. Memory can play funny tricks, you know. (And did you try the WP link I have already given?)  +++$+++ ::Here's one from the BBC, which turned up on the first page when I googled: [http://bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A245620] - see the 2nd para. I notice you don't say you have the books open in front of you. Memory can play funny tricks, you know. (And did you try the WP link I have already given?) [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 22:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

543857 +++$+++ Quadzilla99 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-04 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.173074640E09 +++$+++ I noticed you appear to be involved in biology articles or WikiProjects relating to biology and human processes. This article, on a method for evaluating biological utilizations rates of proteins in human and animal consumption, was started in August and is in desperate need of an expert. We are having trouble locating one and the article desperately needs it. This method is used constantly in bodybuilding magazines and products and is the subject of much misinformation and half-truths. On the other hand it does appear to have some value. Please help if possible. In case you're wondering why I picked you I just looked through some Science [[WikiProjects]] and biology articles and your name appeared a lot in one or both categories.  +++$+++ I noticed you appear to be involved in biology articles or WikiProjects relating to biology and human processes. This article, on a method for evaluating biological utilizations rates of proteins in human and animal consumption, was started in August and is in desperate need of an expert. We are having trouble locating one and the article desperately needs it. This method is used constantly in bodybuilding magazines and products and is the subject of much misinformation and half-truths. On the other hand it does appear to have some value. Please help if possible. In case you're wondering why I picked you I just looked through some Science [[WikiProjects]] and biology articles and your name appeared a lot in one or both categories. [[User:Quadzilla99|Quadzilla99]] 22:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
543858 +++$+++ Quadzilla99 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543857 +++$+++ 543857 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.173076080E09 +++$+++ Incidentally if you decide not to do this for whatever reason there's no need to reply. I'll just take it you're busy or uninterested. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Incidentally if you decide not to do this for whatever reason there's no need to reply. I'll just take it you're busy or uninterested. Thanks. [[User:Quadzilla99|Quadzilla99]] 22:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

281715 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281715 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-24 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.222264500E09 +++$+++ (undent) Could I persuade you to do something that might take 10 or 15 minutes? I no longer have access to biographies from [[Rafe de Crespigny]]: ''A biographical dictionary of Later Han to the Three Kingdoms'', Leiden 2007, ISBN 90-04-15605-4. ... I wonder if it would be too much to ask you to scan the bios of all folks on the list (plus Yuan Shao, your recommendation), and email them to me...? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ (undent) Could I persuade you to do something that might take 10 or 15 minutes? I no longer have access to biographies from [[Rafe de Crespigny]]: ''A biographical dictionary of Later Han to the Three Kingdoms'', Leiden 2007, ISBN 90-04-15605-4. ... I wonder if it would be too much to ask you to scan the bios of all folks on the list (plus Yuan Shao, your recommendation), and email them to me...? [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 06:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
281716 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281715 +++$+++ 281715 +++$+++ 2008-09-25 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.222344180E09 +++$+++ I've been booted over here by Ling, so I'm hijacking your talk page, dk :) I think I would disagree most with the inclusion of Guan Yu and Zhang Fei of all articles selected. They are important in their own right, particularly the romanticised Guan Yu lore, but overall I believe articles regarding pivotal battles should take their place or be added to the list as well. Perhaps the [[Battle of Guandu]]? And how about the [[Battle of Xiaoting]]\/Yiling? I think both of these battles, alongside Red Cliffs, were particularly important chapters in Three Kingdoms history. I also agree with dk that Dong Zhuo is far less critical than Yuan Shao. It could be argued that he kicked off the entire Three Kingdoms era through his actions, but then the argument could be made for the Yellow Turbans rebels and the Ten Eunuchs as well.  +++$+++ :I've been booted over here by Ling, so I'm hijacking your talk page, dk :) I think I would disagree most with the inclusion of Guan Yu and Zhang Fei of all articles selected. They are important in their own right, particularly the romanticised Guan Yu lore, but overall I believe articles regarding pivotal battles should take their place or be added to the list as well. Perhaps the [[Battle of Guandu]]? And how about the [[Battle of Xiaoting]]/Yiling? I think both of these battles, alongside Red Cliffs, were particularly important chapters in Three Kingdoms history. I also agree with dk that Dong Zhuo is far less critical than Yuan Shao. It could be argued that he kicked off the entire Three Kingdoms era through his actions, but then the argument could be made for the Yellow Turbans rebels and the Ten Eunuchs as well. [[User:Gamer Junkie|<font face="Papyrus" color="teal">'''Gamer Junkie'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">T</font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">C</font>]]</sup> 05:03, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
281717 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281715 +++$+++ 281716 +++$+++ 2008-09-25 06:54:00 +++$+++ 1.222350840E09 +++$+++ If anything concrete was passed down from the Three Kingdoms period, the most obvious would have to be Guan Yu and his spiritual influence on the Chinese cultural sphere....heck, it would be hard <u>not<\/u> to find an altar of Guan Yu in any Chinese community today! (Does he deserve this? hrm...not as much. <small>If I stop editing tomorrow, you'll know he has come for me for that comment.<\/small>) The battles, while important, aren't quite up to snuff in terms of quality, and the important bits would be covered in the biographies anyways.  +++$+++ ::If anything concrete was passed down from the Three Kingdoms period, the most obvious would have to be Guan Yu and his spiritual influence on the Chinese cultural sphere....heck, it would be hard <u>not</u> to find an altar of Guan Yu in any Chinese community today! (Does he deserve this? hrm...not as much. <small>If I stop editing tomorrow, you'll know he has come for me for that comment.</small>) The battles, while important, aren't quite up to snuff in terms of quality, and the important bits would be covered in the biographies anyways. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
281718 +++$+++ Gamer Junkie +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281715 +++$+++ 281717 +++$+++ 2008-09-25 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.222354800E09 +++$+++ I guess what he stands for in Chinese culture is pretty important... I guess...  +++$+++ :::I guess what he stands for in Chinese culture is pretty important... I guess... [[User:Gamer Junkie|<font face="Papyrus" color="teal">'''Gamer Junkie'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">T</font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Gamer Junkie|<font color="teal">C</font>]]</sup> 08:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

19572 +++$+++ Sir Richardson +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19572 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-08 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.297205280E09 +++$+++ It didn't take long. Just F3 and Google Chrome. I'm not an expert in copyediting like yourself, though.  +++$+++ It didn't take long. Just F3 and Google Chrome. I'm not an expert in copyediting like yourself, though. [[User:Sir Richardson|Sir Richardson]] ([[User talk:Sir Richardson|talk]]) 14:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
19573 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19572 +++$+++ 19572 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.297215780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the compliment. In Internet Explorer I'd use 'find' and click through, altering each one individually, very tedious. I've got Google Chrome, but how it works is a mystery; do explain if you care to.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the compliment. In Internet Explorer I'd use 'find' and click through, altering each one individually, very tedious. I've got Google Chrome, but how it works is a mystery; do explain if you care to. [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 17:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

265406 +++$+++ Draicone +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265406 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.153334580E09 +++$+++ I saw that you added the delete tag to [[LeisureTime Network]]. I have since wikified the article and in the process removed the tag after addressing your concerns. If you feel this is incorrect, please contact me on my [[User_talk:Draicone|talk page]]. -- +++$+++ I saw that you added the delete tag to [[LeisureTime Network]]. I have since wikified the article and in the process removed the tag after addressing your concerns. If you feel this is incorrect, please contact me on my [[User_talk:Draicone|talk page]]. --[[User:Draicone|<b>Draicone</b>]] [[User_talk:Draicone|<sup><span style="color: #FF9933;">(talk)</span></sup>]] 11:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
265407 +++$+++ Draicone +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265406 +++$+++ 265406 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 06:15:00 +++$+++ 1.153401300E09 +++$+++ Regarding your comment on my talk page, it doesn't meet the criteria, but I fixed it while wikifying. -- +++$+++ :Regarding your comment on my talk page, it doesn't meet the criteria, but I fixed it while wikifying. --[[User:Draicone|<b>Draicone</b>]] [[User_talk:Draicone|<sup><span style="color: #FF9933;">(talk)</span></sup>]] 06:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

19575 +++$+++ Sir Richardson +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19575 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-08 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.297227000E09 +++$+++ Also, I now own John French's Beefheart biography and have been reading it quite fervently. Its only faults are sometimes egregious typographical and spelling errors. I'm quite astounded at how severe much of the abuse of the band members was during the creation of Trout Mask Replica. I'll seek to improve the article with referencing once I finish at (and when procrastination doesn't get the better of me).  +++$+++ Also, I now own John French's Beefheart biography and have been reading it quite fervently. Its only faults are sometimes egregious typographical and spelling errors. I'm quite astounded at how severe much of the abuse of the band members was during the creation of Trout Mask Replica. I'll seek to improve the article with referencing once I finish at (and when procrastination doesn't get the better of me). [[User:Sir Richardson|Sir Richardson]] ([[User talk:Sir Richardson|talk]]) 20:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
19576 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19575 +++$+++ 19575 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.297231260E09 +++$+++ Yes, I can imagine the errors in JF's book - sadly, a feature of pop\/rock books. And yes, wasn't he an ''evil'' taskmaster? All in the name of art, blah blah.  +++$+++ :Yes, I can imagine the errors in JF's book - sadly, a feature of pop/rock books. And yes, wasn't he an ''evil'' taskmaster? All in the name of art, blah blah. [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 22:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

281720 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-13 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.223957640E09 +++$+++ It would really help if you found a reliable source that says that Tong Li published the original Yu-Gi-Oh! - It could be from Tong Li's website or from an archive of Tong Li's site. A bookseller site could help too  +++$+++ It would really help if you found a reliable source that says that Tong Li published the original Yu-Gi-Oh! - It could be from Tong Li's website or from an archive of Tong Li's site. A bookseller site could help too [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 21:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
281721 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281720 +++$+++ 281720 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.223961240E09 +++$+++ The problem is, as [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga#Issues_with_Tong_Li_.28pirating_company.29|seen in the talk page of the WikiProject Anime]], is that the reputation of Tong Li has come into question because of their past pirating history, so some editors insist that the source must be from an unrelated party.  +++$+++ :The problem is, as [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga#Issues_with_Tong_Li_.28pirating_company.29|seen in the talk page of the WikiProject Anime]], is that the reputation of Tong Li has come into question because of their past pirating history, so some editors insist that the source must be from an unrelated party. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 22:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
281722 +++$+++ WhisperToMe +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281720 +++$+++ 281721 +++$+++ 2008-10-14 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.223971380E09 +++$+++ I see - Then we could search the Taipei Times or another Taiwanese newspaper to see if it talks about Yu-Gi-Oh! in Taiwan.  +++$+++ ::I see - Then we could search the Taipei Times or another Taiwanese newspaper to see if it talks about Yu-Gi-Oh! in Taiwan. [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 01:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

19577 +++$+++ Boatman +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-10 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.297395600E09 +++$+++ I hope you do not think I am being too pedantic but the name of the group\/band is \"The Shadows\". (refer Tony's drum kit on the [[The Shadows (album)|The Shadows first album]])  Hence in the text they should be referred to as The Shadows.  In a similar vein there was much discussion re the Small Faces or The Small Faces or Small Faces. A proof point was the band's web site where they are called Small Faces.  Hence I went to see Liverpool play, I went to see Small Faces play and I also went to see The Shadows play. At the end of the day an encyclopedia must be 100% accurate so over to you to revert your edit relating to The Shadows. Again apologies for being very pedantic (at this late hour!)   +++$+++ I hope you do not think I am being too pedantic but the name of the group/band is "The Shadows". (refer Tony's drum kit on the [[The Shadows (album)|The Shadows first album]])  Hence in the text they should be referred to as The Shadows.  In a similar vein there was much discussion re the Small Faces or The Small Faces or Small Faces. A proof point was the band's web site where they are called Small Faces.  Hence I went to see Liverpool play, I went to see Small Faces play and I also went to see The Shadows play. At the end of the day an encyclopedia must be 100% accurate so over to you to revert your edit relating to The Shadows. Again apologies for being very pedantic (at this late hour!)  [[User:Boatman|Boatman]] ([[User talk:Boatman|talk]]) 19:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
19578 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19577 +++$+++ 19577 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.297400520E09 +++$+++ Indeed Small Faces are often wrongly called the Small Faces; to put The would be even worse...  +++$+++ :Indeed Small Faces are often wrongly called the Small Faces; to put The would be even worse... [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 21:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
19579 +++$+++ Boatman +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19577 +++$+++ 19578 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.297404720E09 +++$+++ ...and the Britannica article is titled \"the Shadows\"!  Anyway, thanks for your input.  That's all from me on this one. Thanks again,  +++$+++ :: ...and the Britannica article is titled "the Shadows"!  Anyway, thanks for your input.  That's all from me on this one. Thanks again, [[User:Boatman|Boatman]] ([[User talk:Boatman|talk]]) 22:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
19580 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19577 +++$+++ 19577 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.297405740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reading me!  +++$+++ :Thanks for reading me! [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 22:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

543866 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.173664560E09 +++$+++ Sure, no problem! If you want anything altered, just let me know. I'll upload the file as soon as I'm done. Best,  +++$+++ Sure, no problem! If you want anything altered, just let me know. I'll upload the file as soon as I'm done. Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 18:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
543867 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543866 +++$+++ 543866 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.173667320E09 +++$+++ How's [[:Image:Catabolism schematic.svg|this]]? I've moved the text a bit for alignment, I hope that's OK.  +++$+++ :How's [[:Image:Catabolism schematic.svg|this]]? I've moved the text a bit for alignment, I hope that's OK. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 19:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
543868 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543866 +++$+++ 543867 +++$+++ 2007-03-11 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.173667860E09 +++$+++ No prob. If you need anything else, it's a Sunday :)  +++$+++ ::No prob. If you need anything else, it's a Sunday :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 19:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

281723 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-14 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.224042420E09 +++$+++ I am making a ''Formosa Youth'' article on my sandbox. Wunna' help? Here's [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Jump_Guru\/Sandbox#Formosa_Youth the link]. I figured since you know more about it than me. \u2014  +++$+++ I am making a ''Formosa Youth'' article on my sandbox. Wunna' help? Here's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jump_Guru/Sandbox#Formosa_Youth the link]. I figured since you know more about it than me. — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|TALK]]■</small></sup> 20:47, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
281724 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.224056700E09 +++$+++ I will certainly look into it, thanks for asking! Though that will have to wait until my midterms are over... :(  +++$+++ :I will certainly look into it, thanks for asking! Though that will have to wait until my midterms are over... :( [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 00:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
281725 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281724 +++$+++ 2008-10-15 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.224061560E09 +++$+++ Okay : ). You said something about midterm before. I don't know Chinese so, it would be nice for the locolize titles to be finished. : ) \u2014  +++$+++ ::Okay : ). You said something about midterm before. I don't know Chinese so, it would be nice for the locolize titles to be finished. : ) — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|TALK]]■</small></sup> 02:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
281726 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281725 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.225079160E09 +++$+++ You're done? I saw you edit my sandbox. :D \u2014  +++$+++ :::You're done? I saw you edit my sandbox. :D — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|TALK]]■</small></sup> 20:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
281727 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281726 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.225083360E09 +++$+++ Actually, no, I'm just slacking =D  +++$+++ ::::Actually, no, I'm just slacking =D [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 21:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
281728 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281727 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.225083660E09 +++$+++ Oh... =D \u2014  +++$+++ :::::Oh... =D — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|TALK]]■</small></sup> 22:01, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
281729 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281728 +++$+++ 2008-11-02 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.225670940E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I wont. What we need on the page is the official English title (if there is any), and the localized title. \u2014  +++$+++ ::::::Sorry, I wont. What we need on the page is the official English title (if there is any), and the localized title. — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 16:09, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
281730 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281729 +++$+++ 2008-11-03 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.225758480E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I wasn't being specific. :P The titles in ''italics'' were for romanizations, but that's okay we can easly fix it. \u2014  +++$+++ :::::::Sorry, I wasn't being specific. :P The titles in ''italics'' were for romanizations, but that's okay we can easly fix it. — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 16:28, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
281731 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281730 +++$+++ 2008-11-07 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.226115960E09 +++$+++ Should we make it into an article? \u2014  +++$+++ ::::::::Should we make it into an article? — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 19:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
281732 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281731 +++$+++ 2008-11-07 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.226118900E09 +++$+++ It's up to you :).  +++$+++ :::::::::It's up to you :). [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 20:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
281733 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281732 +++$+++ 2008-11-07 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.226119440E09 +++$+++ [[Formosa Youth|Created]] and added to my created article list, with your help. \u2014  +++$+++ ::::::::::[[Formosa Youth|Created]] and added to my created article list, with your help. — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 20:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
281734 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281733 +++$+++ 2008-11-07 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.226121420E09 +++$+++ It would be well eppreciated if you could put the romanizations for all the series. I will be linking ''Formosa Youth'' on all the series articles, just so it isn't orphaned. \u2014  +++$+++ :::::::::::It would be well eppreciated if you could put the romanizations for all the series. I will be linking ''Formosa Youth'' on all the series articles, just so it isn't orphaned. — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 21:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
281735 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281734 +++$+++ 2008-11-08 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.226197320E09 +++$+++ Hello. :) \u2014  +++$+++ ::::::::::::Hello. :) — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 18:22, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
281736 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281735 +++$+++ 2008-11-10 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.226318460E09 +++$+++ DEADKID! : ) You asked what you could do before. Now i'm giving you something to do. : ) \u2014  +++$+++ :::::::::::::DEADKID! : ) You asked what you could do before. Now i'm giving you something to do. : ) — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 04:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
281737 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281723 +++$+++ 281736 +++$+++ 2008-11-10 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.226323020E09 +++$+++ Spare me, I'm lazy ;_;  +++$+++ ::::::::::::::Spare me, I'm lazy ;_; [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 05:17, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

19581 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-11 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.297475880E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your helpful edits to the new article I created, at '''''[[Richard Smith (silent film director)]]'''''. Much appreciated! ;) Cheers, -- ''' +++$+++ Thank you for your helpful edits to the new article I created, at '''''[[Richard Smith (silent film director)]]'''''. Much appreciated! ;) Cheers, -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 17:58, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
19582 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19581 +++$+++ 19581 +++$+++ 2011-02-11 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.297475940E09 +++$+++ Pleasure -  +++$+++ :Pleasure - [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 17:59, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

614933 +++$+++ Zubenzenubi +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614933 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-23 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.177397880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Zubenzenubi|Zubenzenubi]] 23:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
614934 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614933 +++$+++ 614933 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.177398180E09 +++$+++ The quote is attributed, the comment interpreting it is not.  +++$+++ :The quote is attributed, the comment interpreting it is not. [[User:Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]] 00:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
614935 +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ Paul Cyr +++$+++ 614933 +++$+++ 614934 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.177399080E09 +++$+++ '''EDIT:''' Wait a minute, even what you quoted me saying shows that I didn't saying anything about the EU quote not being attributable, I was saying the comments in relation to the OEM issue not being attributable.  I don't know how you understood it otherwise.  +++$+++ ::'''EDIT:''' Wait a minute, even what you quoted me saying shows that I didn't saying anything about the EU quote not being attributable, I was saying the comments in relation to the OEM issue not being attributable.  I don't know how you understood it otherwise. [[User:Paul Cyr|Paul Cyr]] 00:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

19584 +++$+++ TerriersFan +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19584 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-20 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.300685400E09 +++$+++ Hi, just got back after a long Wikibreak and am picking things up again.  BTW I was surprised to see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Sightings of Madeleine McCann]].  +++$+++ Hi, just got back after a long Wikibreak and am picking things up again.  BTW I was surprised to see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sightings of Madeleine McCann]]. [[User:TerriersFan|TerriersFan]] ([[User talk:TerriersFan|talk]]) 22:30, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
19585 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19584 +++$+++ 19584 +++$+++ 2011-03-21 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.300695960E09 +++$+++ Excellent to see you back. Welcome! Yes, I've just put a few commas in that one, which wasn't on my watchlist, after admiring your sprited defence of it at AfD...  +++$+++ :Excellent to see you back. Welcome! Yes, I've just put a few commas in that one, which wasn't on my watchlist, after admiring your sprited defence of it at AfD... [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 01:26, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
19586 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19584 +++$+++ 19584 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.301716560E09 +++$+++ I think you may have the wrong person. I'm perfectly happy with the current version, which mentions you and your band. All the best,  +++$+++ :I think you may have the wrong person. I'm perfectly happy with the current version, which mentions you and your band. All the best, [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 20:56, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
19587 +++$+++ TerriersFan +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19584 +++$+++ 19586 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.301725140E09 +++$+++ I have placed my views at [[Talk:Freddie and the Dreamers#Edit warring]] where future discussion should best take place.  +++$+++ ::I have placed my views at [[Talk:Freddie and the Dreamers#Edit warring]] where future discussion should best take place. [[User:TerriersFan|TerriersFan]] ([[User talk:TerriersFan|talk]]) 23:19, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
19588 +++$+++ TerriersFan +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19584 +++$+++ 19587 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.302653520E09 +++$+++ Any suggestion on the way forward, please? The page needs to be unprotected at some point but, at the moment, unprotection is likely to result in a resumption of the edit warring.  +++$+++ :::Any suggestion on the way forward, please? The page needs to be unprotected at some point but, at the moment, unprotection is likely to result in a resumption of the edit warring. [[User:TerriersFan|TerriersFan]] ([[User talk:TerriersFan|talk]]) 17:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
19589 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19584 +++$+++ 19588 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.302654540E09 +++$+++ Yes, you need to wait a bit longer, but there are signs that the squabbling is coming to an end.  +++$+++ ::::Yes, you need to wait a bit longer, but there are signs that the squabbling is coming to an end. [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 17:29, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

265408 +++$+++ KarenAnn +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.153343940E09 +++$+++ Also, you mentioned watching the newly-created articles list. How do you do that? The closest I can come is watching the Recent changes list. Newly-created articles list sounds really interesting.  +++$+++ Also, you mentioned watching the newly-created articles list. How do you do that? The closest I can come is watching the Recent changes list. Newly-created articles list sounds really interesting. [[User:KarenAnn|KarenAnn]] 14:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
265409 +++$+++ Matticus78 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265408 +++$+++ 265408 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.153344780E09 +++$+++ Glad it came in useful - I've seen your name a few times around the AfD pages and the like, so I could already tell you were settling into the process. The newly-created articles list is at [[Special:Newpages]], and can also be accessed via the small \"new\" link near the top of the [[Special:Recentchanges|recent changes]] page for quicker access (that's how I usually get to it, anyway - I must get and put some more direct links to useful procedural pages on my own user page, a trick I've seen a lot of other Wiki editors do). You do see a lot odd things pop up there though - some recent articles I sent for speedy deletion included a page about someone's dog (with photos), and a disturbingly detailed article on \"poo racing\", of all things. Some people just don't get Wikipedia at all... ~  +++$+++ :Glad it came in useful - I've seen your name a few times around the AfD pages and the like, so I could already tell you were settling into the process. The newly-created articles list is at [[Special:Newpages]], and can also be accessed via the small "new" link near the top of the [[Special:Recentchanges|recent changes]] page for quicker access (that's how I usually get to it, anyway - I must get and put some more direct links to useful procedural pages on my own user page, a trick I've seen a lot of other Wiki editors do). You do see a lot odd things pop up there though - some recent articles I sent for speedy deletion included a page about someone's dog (with photos), and a disturbingly detailed article on "poo racing", of all things. Some people just don't get Wikipedia at all... ~ [[User:Matticus78|Matticus78]] 14:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

543877 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543877 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-12 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.173765600E09 +++$+++ She started with the missing classes of the [[Archaea]], since she noticed you working on that domain. ;)  Once these drafts are perfected, she can craft the missing orders, families, etc.  Of course, I uploaded the pages for her; I don't think passerines are allowed to have user accounts on Wikipedia, are they?  Looking forward to your comments, and thanks for your very nice and witty note,  +++$+++ She started with the missing classes of the [[Archaea]], since she noticed you working on that domain. ;)  Once these drafts are perfected, she can craft the missing orders, families, etc.  Of course, I uploaded the pages for her; I don't think passerines are allowed to have user accounts on Wikipedia, are they?  Looking forward to your comments, and thanks for your very nice and witty note, [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 23:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
543878 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543877 +++$+++ 543877 +++$+++ 2007-03-14 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.173900720E09 +++$+++ Hi again, thanks for the welcome at [[WP:MICRO]]! :)  I really could use your advice on the most sensible categorization of the taxonomic stubs, as discussed on [[User talk:WillowW|my deeply funky Talk page]].  I'll try to get the NCBI and ToL references working today; stay tuned!  +++$+++ :Hi again, thanks for the welcome at [[WP:MICRO]]! :)  I really could use your advice on the most sensible categorization of the taxonomic stubs, as discussed on [[User talk:WillowW|my deeply funky Talk page]].  I'll try to get the NCBI and ToL references working today; stay tuned! [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 12:32, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

19590 +++$+++ Medeis +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-17 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.303028760E09 +++$+++ You have some nerve saying the edit makes no difference and the reverting it - especially when you first revert was of a perfectly grammatical sentence which you misread by stopping at a comma as if it were a period.  I disagree with the value of all of the last edit, and formally warn you not to violate wp3rr.  +++$+++ You have some nerve saying the edit makes no difference and the reverting it - especially when you first revert was of a perfectly grammatical sentence which you misread by stopping at a comma as if it were a period.  I disagree with the value of all of the last edit, and formally warn you not to violate wp3rr. [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 01:26, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
19591 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19590 +++$+++ 19590 +++$+++ 2011-04-21 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.303433400E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 17:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

611685 +++$+++ Whedonette +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-22 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.164249720E09 +++$+++ Please do not remove [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedy deletion]] tags from articles that you have created yourself{{#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{[[Template:hangon|hangon]]}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. <!-- Template:Drmspeedy -->  &mdash;  +++$+++ Please do not remove [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedy deletion]] tags from articles that you have created yourself{{#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{[[Template:hangon|hangon]]}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. <!-- Template:Drmspeedy -->  &mdash; [[User:Whedonette|Whedonette]] <small>([[User_talk:Whedonette|ping]])</small> 18:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
611686 +++$+++ Whedonette +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611685 +++$+++ 611685 +++$+++ 2006-11-22 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.164249720E09 +++$+++ Follow-up: yes, you ''do'' need to be an admin to review a speedy delete tag.  Check out [[:Template:TestTemplates]], for example &mdash; there's an entire category of warnings about removing speedy delete tags, the first one of which is above. &mdash;  +++$+++ :Follow-up: yes, you ''do'' need to be an admin to review a speedy delete tag.  Check out [[:Template:TestTemplates]], for example &mdash; there's an entire category of warnings about removing speedy delete tags, the first one of which is above. &mdash; [[User:Whedonette|Whedonette]] <small>([[User_talk:Whedonette|ping]])</small> 18:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

19592 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-10 00:35:00 +++$+++ 1.305012900E09 +++$+++ Appreciate the copy edit of [[Roy Orbison]]. -- +++$+++ Appreciate the copy edit of [[Roy Orbison]]. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 00:35, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
19593 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19592 +++$+++ 19592 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.305018060E09 +++$+++ Thanks, it's a very good article, greatly improved since I last saw it (I was directed there by your excellent user page).  +++$+++ :Thanks, it's a very good article, greatly improved since I last saw it (I was directed there by your excellent user page). [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 02:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
19594 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19592 +++$+++ 19593 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.305054240E09 +++$+++ Directed there by my user page? Which is excellent? I'm perplexed. My user page could not be more minimalist unless I deleted it. Ah, well. If it improved Orbison's article, then good. -- +++$+++ ::Directed there by my user page? Which is excellent? I'm perplexed. My user page could not be more minimalist unless I deleted it. Ah, well. If it improved Orbison's article, then good. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 12:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
19595 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19592 +++$+++ 19594 +++$+++ 2011-05-10 15:42:00 +++$+++ 1.305067320E09 +++$+++ Minimalist, that's me!  +++$+++ :::Minimalist, that's me! [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 15:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

543881 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-15 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.174001760E09 +++$+++ Tim, this is most frustrating; maybe your background in bugs, along with your editorial skills, will help resolve this.  It is most irritating to be accused of POV simply because I don't have the medical background to adequately address this article comprehensively, and I haven't found anyone on Wiki who can help. In the general community, it is extremely rare to find a physician who understands PANDAS, with thorough understanding confined mostly to NIH researchers and the specialists on the medical advisory board of the [[Tourette Syndrome Association]].  Every time a TS-related question comes up, I have to do a lot of educating.  If you have time, can you read through [[Talk:P.A.N.D.A.S.]] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#P.A.N.D.A.S. this,] and see if you can come up with a way to fix the wording so that it's not accused of POV, but remains an accurate reflection that this is not a confirmed medical diagnosis?  I didn't write the article (don't feel qualified), but I did add the Controversy section, which I feel was unfairly labeled POV.  I'm going to be traveling for two weeks, and the POV charge really troubles me, since it understates the case, is referenced, factual and confined to a Controversy section.  Best,  +++$+++ Tim, this is most frustrating; maybe your background in bugs, along with your editorial skills, will help resolve this.  It is most irritating to be accused of POV simply because I don't have the medical background to adequately address this article comprehensively, and I haven't found anyone on Wiki who can help. In the general community, it is extremely rare to find a physician who understands PANDAS, with thorough understanding confined mostly to NIH researchers and the specialists on the medical advisory board of the [[Tourette Syndrome Association]].  Every time a TS-related question comes up, I have to do a lot of educating.  If you have time, can you read through [[Talk:P.A.N.D.A.S.]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#P.A.N.D.A.S. this,] and see if you can come up with a way to fix the wording so that it's not accused of POV, but remains an accurate reflection that this is not a confirmed medical diagnosis?  I didn't write the article (don't feel qualified), but I did add the Controversy section, which I feel was unfairly labeled POV.  I'm going to be traveling for two weeks, and the POV charge really troubles me, since it understates the case, is referenced, factual and confined to a Controversy section.  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
543882 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543881 +++$+++ 543881 +++$+++ 2007-03-15 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.174002120E09 +++$+++ PS, as with almost all of my TS references, I don't base my text on abstracts only.  I have most of the PANDAS full-text journal articles, as well as the two Advances in Neurology tomes on TS; the latest has an entire section on PANDAS.   +++$+++ :PS, as with almost all of my TS references, I don't base my text on abstracts only.  I have most of the PANDAS full-text journal articles, as well as the two Advances in Neurology tomes on TS; the latest has an entire section on PANDAS.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

281738 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281738 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-19 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.227091560E09 +++$+++ How do you spell \"Hot\" (\u71b1) in Hanyu Pinyin? : ) \u2014  +++$+++ How do you spell "Hot" (熱) in Hanyu Pinyin? : ) — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 02:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
281739 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281738 +++$+++ 281738 +++$+++ 2008-11-19 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.227100800E09 +++$+++ r\xe8 =D  +++$+++ :rè =D [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 05:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
281740 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281738 +++$+++ 281739 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.227507720E09 +++$+++ My bad. How do you spell \u71b1\u9580 in Hanyu Pinyin? :D \u2014  +++$+++ ::My bad. How do you spell 熱門 in Hanyu Pinyin? :D — [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 22:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
281741 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281738 +++$+++ 281738 +++$+++ 2008-11-24 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.227519840E09 +++$+++ r\xe8m\xe9n  +++$+++ :rèmén [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 01:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
281742 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281738 +++$+++ 281738 +++$+++ 2008-10-18 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.224387420E09 +++$+++ Oh wow, that's a barnstar I'd never dreamt of getting! Thank you for your appreciation for what small role I took in that discussion. :)  +++$+++ :Oh wow, that's a barnstar I'd never dreamt of getting! Thank you for your appreciation for what small role I took in that discussion. :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 20:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

543884 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 22:13:00 +++$+++ 1.174367580E09 +++$+++ Hey Tim. [[User:Colin|Colin]] said I should get in touch with you about this. I've been working a lot on [[coeliac disease]] in the last few months, and have in the last two weeks tried to get it through [[WP:FAC]]. Unfortunately, there remain some stylistic concerns that I can't seem to get past, specifically the prose in particular paragraphs. Is there any chance you could have a look?  +++$+++ Hey Tim. [[User:Colin|Colin]] said I should get in touch with you about this. I've been working a lot on [[coeliac disease]] in the last few months, and have in the last two weeks tried to get it through [[WP:FAC]]. Unfortunately, there remain some stylistic concerns that I can't seem to get past, specifically the prose in particular paragraphs. Is there any chance you could have a look? [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 22:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
543885 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543884 +++$+++ 543884 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.174373460E09 +++$+++ I'm very encouraged by the changes both of you are making. Please don't stop. As a lay reader, I feel that I'm being guided through a difficult topic rather than just given an (accurate) map and expected to make my own way. BTW: There is a typo in the Genetics section, 2nd paragraph: \"Coeliac disease is |linked]] to two alleles of the .\" --  +++$+++ :I'm very encouraged by the changes both of you are making. Please don't stop. As a lay reader, I feel that I'm being guided through a difficult topic rather than just given an (accurate) map and expected to make my own way. BTW: There is a typo in the Genetics section, 2nd paragraph: "Coeliac disease is |linked]] to two alleles of the ." -- [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 23:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

527554 +++$+++ Sam Korn +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-29 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.175230620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]] <sup>[[User talk:Sam Korn|(smoddy)]]</sup> 21:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
527555 +++$+++ Armedblowfish  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527554 +++$+++ 527554 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.175245740E09 +++$+++ Hello [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]].  You are still a member of the committee.  You are simply considered an emeritus, or inactive.  You can become active again whenever you like.  Just move yourself from [[WP:MC#Mediators_Emeriti]] to [[WP:MC#Active_Mediators]].  Welcome back!  : )   +++$+++ : Hello [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]].  You are still a member of the committee.  You are simply considered an emeritus, or inactive.  You can become active again whenever you like.  Just move yourself from [[WP:MC#Mediators_Emeriti]] to [[WP:MC#Active_Mediators]].  Welcome back!  : )  [[User:Armedblowfish |Armed Blowfish]] ([[User talk:Armedblowfish |talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Armedblowfish |mail]]) 02:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
527556 +++$+++ Sam Korn +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527554 +++$+++ 527554 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.175301360E09 +++$+++ One more thing... Is there any chance you could give me level 5 access to #wikipedia-mediation so I can get into it?  Many thanks,  +++$+++ :One more thing... Is there any chance you could give me level 5 access to #wikipedia-mediation so I can get into it?  Many thanks, [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]] <sup>[[User talk:Sam Korn|(smoddy)]]</sup> 17:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
527557 +++$+++ Armedblowfish  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527554 +++$+++ 527556 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.175302140E09 +++$+++ Did you register for an account on freenode?  See [[m:IRC instructions#Register_your_nickname_and_identify]].  Once you've done that, let me know what your freenode username is.  \u2014   +++$+++ :: Did you register for an account on freenode?  See [[m:IRC instructions#Register_your_nickname_and_identify]].  Once you've done that, let me know what your freenode username is.  —  [[User:Armedblowfish |Armed Blowfish]] ([[User talk:Armedblowfish |talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Armedblowfish |mail]]) 17:49, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
527558 +++$+++ Sam Korn +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527554 +++$+++ 527557 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.175302440E09 +++$+++ Whoops.  smoddy, wikipedia\/smoddy.   +++$+++ :::Whoops.  smoddy, wikipedia/smoddy.  [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]] <sup>[[User talk:Sam Korn|(smoddy)]]</sup> 17:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
527559 +++$+++ Armedblowfish  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527554 +++$+++ 527558 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.175305140E09 +++$+++ Okay, I tried typing \"\/invite smoddy #wikipedia-mediation\".  Did anything happen?  \u2014   +++$+++ :::: Okay, I tried typing "/invite smoddy #wikipedia-mediation".  Did anything happen?  —  [[User:Armedblowfish |Armed Blowfish]] ([[User talk:Armedblowfish |talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Armedblowfish |mail]]) 18:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
527560 +++$+++ Armedblowfish  +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527554 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.175305500E09 +++$+++ For future reference, what's the command for that?  \u2014   +++$+++ :::::: For future reference, what's the command for that?  —  [[User:Armedblowfish |Armed Blowfish]] ([[User talk:Armedblowfish |talk]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Armedblowfish |mail]]) 18:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

19598 +++$+++ The Magnificent Clean-keeper +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19598 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-22 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.306121340E09 +++$+++ Your ce at MoMK but also your good work in this regard on other articles is much appreciated. Thought I had to voice this again and encourage you to keep up the good work. Cheers,  +++$+++ Your ce at MoMK but also your good work in this regard on other articles is much appreciated. Thought I had to voice this again and encourage you to keep up the good work. Cheers, [[User:The Magnificent Clean-keeper|TMCk]] ([[User talk:The Magnificent Clean-keeper|talk]]) 20:29, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
19599 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19598 +++$+++ 19598 +++$+++ 2011-05-22 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.306123200E09 +++$+++ Many thanks!  +++$+++ :Many thanks! [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 21:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

19600 +++$+++ Wekn reven i susej eht +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-27 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.306534020E09 +++$+++ Rothorpe, we need your help deciding wether or not to change 'Creation Science' to 'Creation science'. Here's the link: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Creation_Science#Capitals]  +++$+++ Rothorpe, we need your help deciding wether or not to change 'Creation Science' to 'Creation science'. Here's the link: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Creation_Science#Capitals] [[User:Wekn reven i susej eht|Wekn reven i susej eht]] ([[User talk:Wekn reven i susej eht|talk]]) 15:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
19601 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19600 +++$+++ 19600 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.306534200E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 15:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

19602 +++$+++ Sir Richardson +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-02 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.307069100E09 +++$+++ I feel certain recent additions have disrupted the quality of the article. I think it needs to be reverted to an earlier stage while retaining a few that are positive.  +++$+++ I feel certain recent additions have disrupted the quality of the article. I think it needs to be reverted to an earlier stage while retaining a few that are positive. [[User:Sir Richardson|Sir Richardson]] ([[User talk:Sir Richardson|talk]]) 19:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
19603 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19602 +++$+++ 19602 +++$+++ 2011-06-02 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.307069940E09 +++$+++ Yes, OK. I'll be watching.  +++$+++ :Yes, OK. I'll be watching. [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 19:59, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

543891 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543891 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.174512780E09 +++$+++ Sure, Tim. I'll have a look as soon as I can. Best,  +++$+++ Sure, Tim. I'll have a look as soon as I can. Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 14:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
543892 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543891 +++$+++ 543891 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.174522920E09 +++$+++ Hi again\u2014I've left a few comments. All in all, absolutely excellent. I'm looking forward to FAC :)  +++$+++ :Hi again—I've left a few comments. All in all, absolutely excellent. I'm looking forward to FAC :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 17:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
543893 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543891 +++$+++ 543892 +++$+++ 2007-03-25 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.174875900E09 +++$+++ Glad to help. I'll vote soon, and am working on an SVG of [[:Image:Sterol synthesis.png]] on the backburner, if you don't mind my vector graphics obsession.  +++$+++ ::Glad to help. I'll vote soon, and am working on an SVG of [[:Image:Sterol synthesis.png]] on the backburner, if you don't mind my vector graphics obsession. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 19:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
543894 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543891 +++$+++ 543893 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.174893480E09 +++$+++ OK, [[:Image:Sterol synthesis.svg|done]]. I've added it to [[metabolism]], you can add it to any other articles which used the PNG after you've checked it for any inaccuracies... :)  +++$+++ :::OK, [[:Image:Sterol synthesis.svg|done]]. I've added it to [[metabolism]], you can add it to any other articles which used the PNG after you've checked it for any inaccuracies... :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 00:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

19604 +++$+++ IVAN3MAN +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-03 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.307092740E09 +++$+++ RE: <i>\"[I]t was the comma that was wrong\".<\/i> After reading the paragraph again, I now realize that you're right! Excuse me for that error -- I had a brain fart! (Note to self: Drink at least <b>two<\/b> mugs of strong, black coffee <i>before<\/i> editing Wikipedia articles!)  +++$+++ RE: <i>"[I]t was the comma that was wrong".</i> After reading the paragraph again, I now realize that you're right! Excuse me for that error -- I had a brain fart! (Note to self: Drink at least <b>two</b> mugs of strong, black coffee <i>before</i> editing Wikipedia articles!) [[User:IVAN3MAN|IVAN3MAN]] ([[User talk:IVAN3MAN|talk]]) 02:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
19605 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19604 +++$+++ 19604 +++$+++ 2011-06-03 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.307093220E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Enjoy your coffee!  +++$+++ :Thanks. Enjoy your coffee! [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 02:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

19606 +++$+++ Duff +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19606 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-27 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.309239180E09 +++$+++ I think it is ready for another set of eyes, if you've got a minute.    Cheers! <font face=\"Papyrus\"> +++$+++ I think it is ready for another set of eyes, if you've got a minute.    Cheers! <font face="Papyrus">[[user talk:duff|<span style="cursor:crosshair"><font color=" purple">d</font><font color=" red">u</font><font color=" orange">f</font><font color=" gold">f</font></span>]]</font> 22:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
19607 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19606 +++$+++ 19606 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.309251960E09 +++$+++ I'd be delighted, but can we get Stiff sorted out first? You did well to remove the Pink Fairies puff, but there is no need to say that the first single was a 7-inch vinyl one, as all such were in 1976. Most who arrive at the article will already know that, and I put in a wikilink to [[single]] for those that don't (though that article could do with some work). Also, there is no need to say that both tracks were by Nick Lowe, as that too is virtually a given.  +++$+++ :I'd be delighted, but can we get Stiff sorted out first? You did well to remove the Pink Fairies puff, but there is no need to say that the first single was a 7-inch vinyl one, as all such were in 1976. Most who arrive at the article will already know that, and I put in a wikilink to [[single]] for those that don't (though that article could do with some work). Also, there is no need to say that both tracks were by Nick Lowe, as that too is virtually a given. [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 02:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
19608 +++$+++ Duff +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19606 +++$+++ 19607 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.309301520E09 +++$+++ Sure!  I haven't studied it carefully yet, but I will right now.  What your sense of what else needs work here?  I disagree about the inclusion of the 7\" vinyl bit (I, who arrived here, did not know that all singles were in 1976, and I'm well into my forties), but [[WP:IDONTCARE|I don't care]] enough to argue that point.<font face=\"Papyrus\"> +++$+++ ::Sure!  I haven't studied it carefully yet, but I will right now.  What your sense of what else needs work here?  I disagree about the inclusion of the 7" vinyl bit (I, who arrived here, did not know that all singles were in 1976, and I'm well into my forties), but [[WP:IDONTCARE|I don't care]] enough to argue that point.<font face="Papyrus">[[user talk:duff|<span style="cursor:crosshair"><font color=" purple">d</font><font color=" red">u</font><font color=" orange">f</font><font color=" gold">f</font></span>]]</font> 15:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
19609 +++$+++ Duff +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19606 +++$+++ 19607 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.309301700E09 +++$+++ Oh! I forgot to mention that the [[415 Records]] matter was settled yesterday. The original article has been restored, with proper copyright permissions, and is now back in mainspace, also being edited with vigor.<font face=\"Papyrus\"> +++$+++ ::Oh! I forgot to mention that the [[415 Records]] matter was settled yesterday. The original article has been restored, with proper copyright permissions, and is now back in mainspace, also being edited with vigor.<font face="Papyrus">[[user talk:duff|<span style="cursor:crosshair"><font color=" purple">d</font><font color=" red">u</font><font color=" orange">f</font><font color=" gold">f</font></span>]]</font> 15:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
19610 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19606 +++$+++ 19606 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309328280E09 +++$+++ OK, I'm happy with my rewrite of the Lowe single, hope you will be too & that it addresses the concerns of you youngsters!  +++$+++ :OK, I'm happy with my rewrite of the Lowe single, hope you will be too & that it addresses the concerns of you youngsters! [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 23:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

281751 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-02 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.228230540E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure which battle it is supposed to depict; the author [[:Image:Battle at the Bridge, West Wall, Stone Chamber 1.jpg|who I quoted on the image's page]] provided mere speculation about the figures in the battle scene.--<strong> +++$+++ I'm not sure which battle it is supposed to depict; the author [[:Image:Battle at the Bridge, West Wall, Stone Chamber 1.jpg|who I quoted on the image's page]] provided mere speculation about the figures in the battle scene.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 07:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
281752 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281751 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 07:09:00 +++$+++ 1.228230540E09 +++$+++ And lest I forget: I love your cat picture. Lol.--<strong> +++$+++ ::And lest I forget: I love your cat picture. Lol.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 07:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
281753 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281751 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.228231260E09 +++$+++ Thanks. =D The names on the cartouches might provide some clues, but unfortunately I can't make out the characters....Though if we look at the battles around that time that features a bridge, then perhaps the [[Battle of Jieqiao]]? The presence of women is puzzling, though. And I certainly don't remember anyone in the Wu family (which Wu?) being in that battle... Or maybe the rubbing is made to commemorate some already ancient battle, suggested by the use of chariots (early Spring and Autumn period), or just a coup in the Han court (since high officials would be riding around in chariots with female courtiers around them).  +++$+++ :::Thanks. =D The names on the cartouches might provide some clues, but unfortunately I can't make out the characters....Though if we look at the battles around that time that features a bridge, then perhaps the [[Battle of Jieqiao]]? The presence of women is puzzling, though. And I certainly don't remember anyone in the Wu family (which Wu?) being in that battle... Or maybe the rubbing is made to commemorate some already ancient battle, suggested by the use of chariots (early Spring and Autumn period), or just a coup in the Han court (since high officials would be riding around in chariots with female courtiers around them). [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 07:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

281754 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-02 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.228233240E09 +++$+++ So this battle scene could depict any number of battles throughout history. Unfortunately, Cary Y. Liu does not specify which one. However, I thought a contemporary Eastern Han illustration of a battle scene was appropriate in an article focused on warfare in the Eastern Han period.--<strong> +++$+++ So this battle scene could depict any number of battles throughout history. Unfortunately, Cary Y. Liu does not specify which one. However, I thought a contemporary Eastern Han illustration of a battle scene was appropriate in an article focused on warfare in the Eastern Han period.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 07:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
281755 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281754 +++$+++ 281754 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.228243200E09 +++$+++ I found a [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?hl=en&id=3J-aAAAAIAAJ book] that may go into the details of each portrait, I may go to my university's library tomorrow to find out more :) The problem I have with that image is that it's there for decorative reasons and it can be potentially misleading.  +++$+++ :I found a [http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=3J-aAAAAIAAJ book] that may go into the details of each portrait, I may go to my university's library tomorrow to find out more :) The problem I have with that image is that it's there for decorative reasons and it can be potentially misleading. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 10:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
281756 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281754 +++$+++ 281755 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.228266120E09 +++$+++ Perhaps; I don't think an actual Han relief exists which portrays the campaign against Dong Zhuo. Good luck with finding relevant info.--<strong> +++$+++ ::Perhaps; I don't think an actual Han relief exists which portrays the campaign against Dong Zhuo. Good luck with finding relevant info.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 17:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
281757 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281754 +++$+++ 281756 +++$+++ 2008-12-03 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.228316340E09 +++$+++ I'm fine with having no image if none exists. I guess the relevance of the images to the article is more important to me. (Still haven't gone to the library yet!)  +++$+++ :::I'm fine with having no image if none exists. I guess the relevance of the images to the article is more important to me. (Still haven't gone to the library yet!) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
281758 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281754 +++$+++ 281757 +++$+++ 2008-12-03 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.228316640E09 +++$+++ Then what of the image of the Han pottery soldiers? Is that not relevant either? They don't display actual soldiers who fought in the campaign against Dong Zhuo, yet they display how Han soldiers' outfits would have looked like in general. The same goes for the Wu family shrine pic, only it shows outfits ''and'' weapons that would have been used.--<strong> +++$+++ ::::Then what of the image of the Han pottery soldiers? Is that not relevant either? They don't display actual soldiers who fought in the campaign against Dong Zhuo, yet they display how Han soldiers' outfits would have looked like in general. The same goes for the Wu family shrine pic, only it shows outfits ''and'' weapons that would have been used.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 07:04, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
281759 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281754 +++$+++ 281758 +++$+++ 2008-12-03 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.228317900E09 +++$+++ If there is an article on the military systems of ancient China, or of the Han, then those images might be appropriate. Or else these images can show up on every article that happens to be about battles in the Han Dynasty, and who knows where that will end!  +++$+++ :::::If there is an article on the military systems of ancient China, or of the Han, then those images might be appropriate. Or else these images can show up on every article that happens to be about battles in the Han Dynasty, and who knows where that will end! [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 07:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

19611 +++$+++ 78.26 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.311155100E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Thanks for you help on [[Bohumir Kryl]].  I've made numerous changes, and still plan adding material.  However, I would welcome and appreciate your further review.  Thanks!    +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for you help on [[Bohumir Kryl]].  I've made numerous changes, and still plan adding material.  However, I would welcome and appreciate your further review.  Thanks!   [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] ([[User talk:78.26|talk]]) 02:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
19612 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19611 +++$+++ 19611 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311210060E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Your new stuff looks good. I'll be watching. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks! Your new stuff looks good. I'll be watching. Cheers, [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 18:01, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

543900 +++$+++ MetsFan76 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543900 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-29 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.175212440E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim!  I'm not sure if you saw my message about volunteering to help out on the bacteria article but I am more than willing to do what I can.  Just let me know what you need me to do.  Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi Tim!  I'm not sure if you saw my message about volunteering to help out on the bacteria article but I am more than willing to do what I can.  Just let me know what you need me to do.  Thanks! [[User:MetsFan76|MetsFan76]] 16:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
543901 +++$+++ MetsFan76 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543900 +++$+++ 543900 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.175212800E09 +++$+++ Ok sounds good!  +++$+++ :Ok sounds good! [[User:MetsFan76|MetsFan76]] 17:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

19613 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19613 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.311996120E09 +++$+++ [[Gene McDaniels]] and you got it right.  Thanks.  I have not been able to verify that he did die today.   it sort of rings true, but.... an obit would be nice. Einar aka  +++$+++ [[Gene McDaniels]] and you got it right.  Thanks.  I have not been able to verify that he did die today.   it sort of rings true, but.... an obit would be nice. Einar aka [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] ([[User talk:Carptrash|talk]]) 20:22, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
19614 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19613 +++$+++ 19613 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.311997020E09 +++$+++ Sorry about that, yes, I was looking for an obit too. Curiously, he was born the day after the more famous Gene who died in 1971.  +++$+++ :Sorry about that, yes, I was looking for an obit too. Curiously, he was born the day after the more famous Gene who died in 1971. [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 20:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

543902 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-30 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.175268060E09 +++$+++ Congratulations. Clearly a lot of work went into that article. Well done.  +++$+++ Congratulations. Clearly a lot of work went into that article. Well done. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 08:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
543903 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543902 +++$+++ 543902 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.175287080E09 +++$+++ And mine\u2014my, that was a quick one! Well done yet again.  +++$+++ :And mine—my, that was a quick one! Well done yet again. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]] 13:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
543904 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543902 +++$+++ 543903 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.175295600E09 +++$+++ Wow, that was quick; sorry that I didn't even get to comment!  You're a credit to us all. :)  +++$+++ ::Wow, that was quick; sorry that I didn't even get to comment!  You're a credit to us all. :) [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 16:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

19616 +++$+++ Superp +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19616 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.312208280E09 +++$+++ Rothorpe, your help is appreciated, but would you please be so helpful to include summaries with your edits, especially when [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sonia_Delaunay&action=historysubmit&diff=442442462&oldid=441857486 these] are nigh on invisible in the diffs? Thanks.  +++$+++ Rothorpe, your help is appreciated, but would you please be so helpful to include summaries with your edits, especially when [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sonia_Delaunay&action=historysubmit&diff=442442462&oldid=441857486 these] are nigh on invisible in the diffs? Thanks. [[User:Superp|Superp]] ([[User talk:Superp|talk]]) 07:18, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
19617 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19616 +++$+++ 19616 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.312236900E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but I'm an old geezer of 61, with gammy shoulders. Clicking \"'''m'''\" means \"copyedits\", so if you're interested in the commas &c I put in & take out, please look for them. In other cases I always provide an edit summary.  +++$+++ :Sorry, but I'm an old geezer of 61, with gammy shoulders. Clicking "'''m'''" means "copyedits", so if you're interested in the commas &c I put in & take out, please look for them. In other cases I always provide an edit summary. [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 15:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

19618 +++$+++ TerriersFan +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-02 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.312327200E09 +++$+++ Hi, this image has a #15 in the top left corner. Before I take it out I thought that I better check that it is not significant! (The uploader is blocked so cannot be consulted). Best wishes.  +++$+++ Hi, this image has a #15 in the top left corner. Before I take it out I thought that I better check that it is not significant! (The uploader is blocked so cannot be consulted). Best wishes. [[User:TerriersFan|TerriersFan]] ([[User talk:TerriersFan|talk]]) 16:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
19619 +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ Rothorpe +++$+++ 19618 +++$+++ 19618 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.312327680E09 +++$+++ I suspect it's a chart position, so, yes, do take it out. All the best,  +++$+++ :I suspect it's a chart position, so, yes, do take it out. All the best, [[User:Rothorpe|Rothorpe]] ([[User talk:Rothorpe#top|talk]]) 16:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

543907 +++$+++ Ciar +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543907 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-03 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.175652300E09 +++$+++ Again Tim, thanks! Your definitely an asset to the MCB project!!!  Take care  +++$+++ Again Tim, thanks! Your definitely an asset to the MCB project!!!  Take care [[User:Ciar|Ciar]] 19:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
543908 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543907 +++$+++ 543907 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.175652420E09 +++$+++ Congrats from me too... Thanks for nominating it and all of the effort you put in.-- +++$+++ :Congrats from me too... Thanks for nominating it and all of the effort you put in.--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 19:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

281764 +++$+++ Miller17CU94 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-11 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.229055540E09 +++$+++ Impressive user page. Congrats on the DYK also.  +++$+++ Impressive user page. Congrats on the DYK also. [[User:Miller17CU94|Chris]] ([[User talk:Miller17CU94|talk]]) 20:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
281765 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281764 +++$+++ 281764 +++$+++ 2008-12-12 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.229074920E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your kind words!  +++$+++ :Thank you for your kind words! [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 01:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

19621 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-13 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.179043080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding ethnicity facts to so many county articles - can you please provide citations for what you add? Thanks,  +++$+++ Thanks for adding ethnicity facts to so many county articles - can you please provide citations for what you add? Thanks, [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]] 00:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
19622 +++$+++ Chrisbak +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19621 +++$+++ 19621 +++$+++ 2007-05-13 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.179114600E09 +++$+++ I have the same question for Cumberland and Sagadahoc counties in Maine - the first few paragraphs of the Demographics section are on data from the federal census of 2000. However since I couldn't find this ancestry data in the 2000 federal census, I have moved the ancestry data to the end of the section pending  confirmation. Verifiability is obviously key in editing demographic data. Please consider replying here. Thank you.-- +++$+++ :I have the same question for Cumberland and Sagadahoc counties in Maine - the first few paragraphs of the Demographics section are on data from the federal census of 2000. However since I couldn't find this ancestry data in the 2000 federal census, I have moved the ancestry data to the end of the section pending  confirmation. Verifiability is obviously key in editing demographic data. Please consider replying here. Thank you.--[[User:Chrisbak|Chrisbak]] 20:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
19623 +++$+++ Chrisbak +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19621 +++$+++ 19622 +++$+++ 2007-05-13 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.179121980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your prompt reply - I found the ancestry data for the 2000 Census  (census.gov) in the \"SF 3\" section. It is interesting data, however right now an editor could be absolutely baffled by where you got your percentages from. Therefore I would probably have said something like this: \"Ancestry reported out of 125% (multiple answers were allowed) was: ...\" followed by percentages from census.gov. Also I might have placed my edit with the information from the \"Social characteristics\" section, rather than the data from \"General Characteristics\". However ask any questions you have at [[WP:ASSIST|Editor Assistance]] - simply click \"Request Assistance\" and someone will reply. The editors who reply there are very willing to help new editors.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks for your prompt reply - I found the ancestry data for the 2000 Census  (census.gov) in the "SF 3" section. It is interesting data, however right now an editor could be absolutely baffled by where you got your percentages from. Therefore I would probably have said something like this: "Ancestry reported out of 125% (multiple answers were allowed) was: ..." followed by percentages from census.gov. Also I might have placed my edit with the information from the "Social characteristics" section, rather than the data from "General Characteristics". However ask any questions you have at [[WP:ASSIST|Editor Assistance]] - simply click "Request Assistance" and someone will reply. The editors who reply there are very willing to help new editors.--[[User:Chrisbak|Chrisbak]] 22:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
19624 +++$+++ Ruhrfisch +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19621 +++$+++ 19623 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.179137820E09 +++$+++ I tried to find the information using your description on [[User talk:Chrisbak]] but could not (I'm tired, so more dense). Since it is not trivial to find, I think you must cite the actual webpage you get it from (please). You can either do this as a link: [http:\/\/factfinder.census.gov\/servlet\/SAFFFacts?_event=&geo_id=05000US42071&_geoContext=01000US%7C04000US42%7C05000US42071&_street=&_county=lancaster+county&_cityTown=lancaster+county&_state=04000US42&_zip=&_lang=en&_sse=on&ActiveGeoDiv=&_useEV=&pctxt=fph&pgsl=050&_submenuId=factsheet_1&ds_name=ACS_2005_SAFF&_ci_nbr=null&qr_name=null&reg=null%3Anull&_keyword=&_industry=] or using <nowiki><ref><\/nowiki> tages or even {{tl|Cite web}} in side a ref. Otherwise there are going to be other editors who revert it or vandals will change it and no one will know where to look for the original data.  +++$+++ :::I tried to find the information using your description on [[User talk:Chrisbak]] but could not (I'm tired, so more dense). Since it is not trivial to find, I think you must cite the actual webpage you get it from (please). You can either do this as a link: [http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/SAFFFacts?_event=&geo_id=05000US42071&_geoContext=01000US%7C04000US42%7C05000US42071&_street=&_county=lancaster+county&_cityTown=lancaster+county&_state=04000US42&_zip=&_lang=en&_sse=on&ActiveGeoDiv=&_useEV=&pctxt=fph&pgsl=050&_submenuId=factsheet_1&ds_name=ACS_2005_SAFF&_ci_nbr=null&qr_name=null&reg=null%3Anull&_keyword=&_industry=] or using <nowiki><ref></nowiki> tages or even {{tl|Cite web}} in side a ref. Otherwise there are going to be other editors who revert it or vandals will change it and no one will know where to look for the original data. [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]] 03:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
19625 +++$+++ Chrisbak +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19621 +++$+++ 19624 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.179546720E09 +++$+++ _________________________ Posted by-- +++$+++ ::::_________________________ Posted by--[[User:Chrisbak|Chrisbak]] 20:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

281766 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-04 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.231057980E09 +++$+++ red cliffs is on the main page [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ red cliffs is on the main page [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 00:33, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
281767 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281766 +++$+++ 281766 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.231077240E09 +++$+++ This is sudden....lol.  +++$+++ :This is sudden....lol. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 05:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
281768 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281766 +++$+++ 281767 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 06:16:00 +++$+++ 1.231078560E09 +++$+++ I didn't know either; SandyGeorgia let me know. Hey, do you have free time to watch it for vandalism? I'm supposed to be finishing making Finals for the semester... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ ::I didn't know either; SandyGeorgia let me know. Hey, do you have free time to watch it for vandalism? I'm supposed to be finishing making Finals for the semester... [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 06:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
281769 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281766 +++$+++ 281768 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 06:28:00 +++$+++ 1.231079280E09 +++$+++ Will do, I guess this will be how I will spend the last days of my winter vacation...  +++$+++ :::Will do, I guess this will be how I will spend the last days of my winter vacation... [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:28, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

19626 +++$+++ R'n'B +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19626 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-14 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.179149460E09 +++$+++ Hello. Thank you for your recent edit to [[Aroostook County, Maine]]. Your edit included links to the pages [[American]], [[English]], and [[French]], which are [[Wikipedia:disambiguation|disambiguation]] pages. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can [[WP:DPL|help Wikipedia]] by revising the links you added to [[Aroostook County, Maine]] to refer directly to the most relevant topic.  (This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:R%27n%27B&action=edit&section=new report the error] to help us improve this feature.) -- +++$+++ Hello. Thank you for your recent edit to [[Aroostook County, Maine]]. Your edit included links to the pages [[American]], [[English]], and [[French]], which are [[Wikipedia:disambiguation|disambiguation]] pages. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can [[WP:DPL|help Wikipedia]] by revising the links you added to [[Aroostook County, Maine]] to refer directly to the most relevant topic.  (This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:R%27n%27B&action=edit&section=new report the error] to help us improve this feature.) --[[User:R'n'B|Russ]] [[User talk:R'n'B|(talk)]] 06:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
19627 +++$+++ Gil Gamesh +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19626 +++$+++ 19626 +++$+++ 2007-05-16 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.179345300E09 +++$+++ Hi! This is a \"me too\" message :) for the stats on people of \"Irish\" ancestry. The link [[Irish]] also leads to a disambiguation page. I think it would be better to use <nowiki>[[Irish American|Irish]]<\/nowiki> instead. Keep up the good work though!  +++$+++ : Hi! This is a "me too" message :) for the stats on people of "Irish" ancestry. The link [[Irish]] also leads to a disambiguation page. I think it would be better to use <nowiki>[[Irish American|Irish]]</nowiki> instead. Keep up the good work though! [[User:Gil Gamesh|Gil Gamesh]] 12:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

281771 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281771 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-04 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.231134180E09 +++$+++ I'm making an article for ''[[Bat-Manga! The Secret History of Batman in Japan]]'', which in the hardcover version holds a [http:\/\/manga.about.com\/od\/conventionphotogallerie1\/ig\/SD-Comic-Con-2008-Gallery\/SDCC-08---China-Batman.htm old Batman manhua bootleg.] I want to get the Chinese title onto the page, can you spell out the Chinese title and put it into Hanyu, please? :-D It would help me alot, thanks. Plus, wassup. \u2013  +++$+++ I'm making an article for ''[[Bat-Manga! The Secret History of Batman in Japan]]'', which in the hardcover version holds a [http://manga.about.com/od/conventionphotogallerie1/ig/SD-Comic-Con-2008-Gallery/SDCC-08---China-Batman.htm old Batman manhua bootleg.] I want to get the Chinese title onto the page, can you spell out the Chinese title and put it into Hanyu, please? :-D It would help me alot, thanks. Plus, wassup. – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 21:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
281772 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281771 +++$+++ 281771 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.231134780E09 +++$+++ Reading from right to left: \u98db\u4fe0 \u9ed1\u8759\u8760 \u83f2\u6d32\u4e4b\u795e (Batman: God of Africa). Ah, the wonders of bootleg.  +++$+++ :Reading from right to left: 飛俠 黑蝙蝠 菲洲之神 (Batman: God of Africa). Ah, the wonders of bootleg. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 21:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
281773 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281771 +++$+++ 281772 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.231135380E09 +++$+++ How do you spell that in Hanyu Pinyin? :D LOL, ''Batman: God of Africa''! \u2013  +++$+++ ::How do you spell that in Hanyu Pinyin? :D LOL, ''Batman: God of Africa''! – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 22:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
281774 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281771 +++$+++ 281773 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.231135560E09 +++$+++ F\u0113ixi\xe1 H\u0113ibi\u0101nf\xfa F\u0113izh\u014du zh\u012b\tSh\xe9n :D  +++$+++ :::Fēixiá Hēibiānfú Fēizhōu zhī	Shén :D [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 22:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
281775 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281771 +++$+++ 281774 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.231135680E09 +++$+++ Thank you, that's a mouth-full. So what's new in your life? : ) \u2013  +++$+++ ::::Thank you, that's a mouth-full. So what's new in your life? : ) – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 22:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
281776 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281771 +++$+++ 281775 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.231136640E09 +++$+++ Getting snowed in for all of winter vacation and school's starting again tomorrow. :<  +++$+++ :::::Getting snowed in for all of winter vacation and school's starting again tomorrow. :< [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 22:24, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
281777 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281771 +++$+++ 281776 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.231137360E09 +++$+++ Mah, I feel your pain. :-( Sorry I asked... Well, any new comics or anything? \u2013  +++$+++ ::::::Mah, I feel your pain. :-( Sorry I asked... Well, any new comics or anything? – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 22:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
281778 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281771 +++$+++ 281777 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.231138920E09 +++$+++ I'm reading this epic mahjong manga called \"[http:\/\/zepy.momotato.com\/2009\/01\/04\/manga-mudazumo-naki-kaikaku\/ The Legend of Koizumi]\", and it's so epic that I even [[The Legend of Koizumi|made an article about it]]! Did I mention that it's epic? :D  +++$+++ :::::::I'm reading this epic mahjong manga called "[http://zepy.momotato.com/2009/01/04/manga-mudazumo-naki-kaikaku/ The Legend of Koizumi]", and it's so epic that I even [[The Legend of Koizumi|made an article about it]]! Did I mention that it's epic? :D [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 23:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
281779 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281771 +++$+++ 281778 +++$+++ 2009-01-04 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.231139640E09 +++$+++ LOL That looks funny, I like how they're based on polititions. :-P It looks like it also came from a mahjong manga magazine too. \u2013  +++$+++ ::::::::LOL That looks funny, I like how they're based on polititions. :-P It looks like it also came from a mahjong manga magazine too. – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 23:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

543916 +++$+++ Diberri +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-10 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.176252960E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your comments over at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Long-term potentiation]]. They've really helped me pinpoint where [[Long-term potentiation]] can be improved. If you've got a spare moment, would you mind taking a gander at the latest revision? I did quite a bit of work on it yesterday and welcome your comments. Thanks! -- +++$+++ Thanks again for your comments over at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Long-term potentiation]]. They've really helped me pinpoint where [[Long-term potentiation]] can be improved. If you've got a spare moment, would you mind taking a gander at the latest revision? I did quite a bit of work on it yesterday and welcome your comments. Thanks! --[[User:Diberri|David Iberri]] ([[User talk:Diberri|talk]]) 17:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
543917 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543916 +++$+++ 543916 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.176268080E09 +++$+++ Hey, Tim.  What's up on that FAC page?  It's not listed at FAC, and the original (archived) FAC page is now distorted (something I keep up with in my ArticleHistory and archiving work with GimmeBot\/Gimmetrow).  Did Diberri mean to nominate it?  If so, I need to correctly recreate the  new nom.  If not, I need to revert the subsequent comments out of the old FAC and move them to the talk page, to preserve the old fac.   +++$+++ :Hey, Tim.  What's up on that FAC page?  It's not listed at FAC, and the original (archived) FAC page is now distorted (something I keep up with in my ArticleHistory and archiving work with GimmeBot/Gimmetrow).  Did Diberri mean to nominate it?  If so, I need to correctly recreate the  new nom.  If not, I need to revert the subsequent comments out of the old FAC and move them to the talk page, to preserve the old fac.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
543918 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543916 +++$+++ 543917 +++$+++ 2007-04-10 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.176268260E09 +++$+++ PS, you'll see the problems show up at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Archived nominations\/October 2006]], where I have to track them down.  The new process (where GimmeBot closes the old FACs) should help avoid this continuing to happen, but I have to keep checking the old facfaileds.   +++$+++ ::PS, you'll see the problems show up at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/October 2006]], where I have to track them down.  The new process (where GimmeBot closes the old FACs) should help avoid this continuing to happen, but I have to keep checking the old facfaileds.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

19630 +++$+++ MariusM +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19630 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-08 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.183952280E09 +++$+++ Please let me know the source for detail data of 2004 Census in Transnistria at rayonal level.-- +++$+++ Please let me know the source for detail data of 2004 Census in Transnistria at rayonal level.--[[User:MariusM|MariusM]] 20:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
19631 +++$+++ MariusM +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19630 +++$+++ 19630 +++$+++ 2007-07-09 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.184035920E09 +++$+++ As a principle, Wikipedia is not a [[WP:RS|reliabhle source]] and can not refference itself. Data may be correct but I am curious to see if those were officially published. I was not able to find ethnicity data at rayonal level published officially by PMR authorities, despite the fact that I looked for them, I was wandering if PMR gave up at the secrecy on this issue.-- +++$+++ :As a principle, Wikipedia is not a [[WP:RS|reliabhle source]] and can not refference itself. Data may be correct but I am curious to see if those were officially published. I was not able to find ethnicity data at rayonal level published officially by PMR authorities, despite the fact that I looked for them, I was wandering if PMR gave up at the secrecy on this issue.--[[User:MariusM|MariusM]] 19:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

19632 +++$+++ Ward20 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-05 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.196853720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your contributon to the article [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Genesee_County%2C_New_York&diff=138704667&oldid=138582879 here]. I have been trying to put ref's in and am not finding the same numbers [http:\/\/factfinder.census.gov\/servlet\/QTTable?_bm=y&-qr_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_DP2&-geo_id=05000US36037&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&-_lang=en&-redoLog=false&-CONTEXT=qt&-currentselections=DEC_2000_SF3_U_DP2 according to] [[Census 2000]]. Can you help? Thanks.  +++$+++ Thanks for your contributon to the article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genesee_County%2C_New_York&diff=138704667&oldid=138582879 here]. I have been trying to put ref's in and am not finding the same numbers [http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=y&-qr_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_DP2&-geo_id=05000US36037&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&-_lang=en&-redoLog=false&-CONTEXT=qt&-currentselections=DEC_2000_SF3_U_DP2 according to] [[Census 2000]]. Can you help? Thanks. [[User:Ward20|Ward20]] ([[User talk:Ward20|talk]]) 03:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
19633 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19632 +++$+++ 19632 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.203548220E09 +++$+++ You can find those statistics in the Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3) - Sample Data. Scroll down the list until you find \"First ancestry reported\" and then do the percentage math, as just the raw numbers are given.  +++$+++ :You can find those statistics in the Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3) - Sample Data. Scroll down the list until you find "First ancestry reported" and then do the percentage math, as just the raw numbers are given. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 14:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

19634 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19634 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-20 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.203545220E09 +++$+++ I notice that you've added population statistics to Wisconsin county articles. Would you please add the source of these statistics to these and all articles? While they look reasonable, how can anyone trust that the statistics are valid without [[WP:CITE|citing]] the [[WP:RS|reliable source]]?  +++$+++ I notice that you've added population statistics to Wisconsin county articles. Would you please add the source of these statistics to these and all articles? While they look reasonable, how can anyone trust that the statistics are valid without [[WP:CITE|citing]] the [[WP:RS|reliable source]]? [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 14:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
19635 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19634 +++$+++ 19634 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.203546300E09 +++$+++ They're from [[Census 2000]], as the rest of the population statistics. The reason why I didn't mention it was because I thought it would look somewhat redundant to mention specifically that the statistics for reported ancestry were indeed from the same source as the rest of the population statistics. The statistics for race and Hispanic origin, after all, are quoted as such, without any specific mention of the fact that their source is [[Census 2000]]. +++$+++ :They're from [[Census 2000]], as the rest of the population statistics. The reason why I didn't mention it was because I thought it would look somewhat redundant to mention specifically that the statistics for reported ancestry were indeed from the same source as the rest of the population statistics. The statistics for race and Hispanic origin, after all, are quoted as such, without any specific mention of the fact that their source is [[Census 2000]].[[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 14:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
19636 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19634 +++$+++ 19635 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.203546960E09 +++$+++ More precisely, those statistics can be found in the Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3) - Sample Data (First ancestry reported). I have only included reported ancestries that make up at least 5% of the population in a given area.  +++$+++ ::More precisely, those statistics can be found in the Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3) - Sample Data (First ancestry reported). I have only included reported ancestries that make up at least 5% of the population in a given area. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 14:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

281780 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281780 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-06 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.231241580E09 +++$+++ Oi, I think I'll take that clown to ANI... I think he's elsewhere in the hist doing the same AD\/CE thing; perhaps under a different IP address. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ Oi, I think I'll take that clown to ANI... I think he's elsewhere in the hist doing the same AD/CE thing; perhaps under a different IP address. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 03:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
281781 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281780 +++$+++ 281780 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.231242180E09 +++$+++ My personal opinion is that the revert wars between AD or CE are plainly stupid. I only reverted him because he took out a ref.  +++$+++ :My personal opinion is that the revert wars between AD or CE are plainly stupid. I only reverted him because he took out a ref. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 03:43, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

19637 +++$+++ Southern Illinois SKYWARN +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19637 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-16 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.205704740E09 +++$+++ I reverted the edit as it sounded suspicious. Also, if any unreferenced content on Wikipedia will be removed. You must cite information using <nowiki><ref>source<\/ref><\/nowiki> or a [[Wikipedia:Citation templates|citation template]]. Any other content will be deleted.  +++$+++ I reverted the edit as it sounded suspicious. Also, if any unreferenced content on Wikipedia will be removed. You must cite information using <nowiki><ref>source</ref></nowiki> or a [[Wikipedia:Citation templates|citation template]]. Any other content will be deleted. [[User:Southern Illinois SKYWARN|Southern Illinois SKYWARN]] ([[User talk:Southern Illinois SKYWARN|talk]]) 14:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
19638 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19637 +++$+++ 19637 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.205705640E09 +++$+++ I had clearly mentioned the source, which is the same as for the other population statistics ( [[Census 2000]] ). In any case it would definitely have been a good idea to ask me first about the figures before taking unilateral action ''exactly a minute'' after I had posted those figures. Deleting figures the very second you see them, without even taking the trouble of asking about them (or checking them) is ''way'' too rash for ''anybody's'' taste.  +++$+++ :I had clearly mentioned the source, which is the same as for the other population statistics ( [[Census 2000]] ). In any case it would definitely have been a good idea to ask me first about the figures before taking unilateral action ''exactly a minute'' after I had posted those figures. Deleting figures the very second you see them, without even taking the trouble of asking about them (or checking them) is ''way'' too rash for ''anybody's'' taste. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 15:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
19639 +++$+++ Southern Illinois SKYWARN +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19637 +++$+++ 19638 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.206565860E09 +++$+++ Any content that is not referenced to a source using a ref tag can be deleted without any discussion per policy. If you have a problem with that, bring it up at [[WT:CITE]], although it is a good policy that will not change.  +++$+++ ::Any content that is not referenced to a source using a ref tag can be deleted without any discussion per policy. If you have a problem with that, bring it up at [[WT:CITE]], although it is a good policy that will not change. [[User:Southern Illinois SKYWARN|Southern Illinois SKYWARN]] ([[User talk:Southern Illinois SKYWARN|talk]]) 14:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

281782 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281782 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-11 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.231664340E09 +++$+++ I would love for you to join friend, because I know you are a trusty editor who would be a great addition to our team. We only have two members now and I came to ask you. I will probably ask [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] soon as well.  You do not have to join, and neither are you obliged; I am just asking. Thank you for your time dk. -- +++$+++ I would love for you to join friend, because I know you are a trusty editor who would be a great addition to our team. We only have two members now and I came to ask you. I will probably ask [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] soon as well.  You do not have to join, and neither are you obliged; I am just asking. Thank you for your time dk. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] ([[User talk:EveryDayJoe45|talk]]) 00:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
281783 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281782 +++$+++ 281782 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.231666800E09 +++$+++ Hi. Thanks for the invitation. I don't usually edit the Koei articles so much, so I don't feel so compelled to join your WikiProject. My apologies. However, I'd be more than happy to oblige if you need any help with anything.  +++$+++ :Hi. Thanks for the invitation. I don't usually edit the Koei articles so much, so I don't feel so compelled to join your WikiProject. My apologies. However, I'd be more than happy to oblige if you need any help with anything. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 01:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
281784 +++$+++ EveryDayJoe45 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281782 +++$+++ 281783 +++$+++ 2009-01-11 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.231666980E09 +++$+++ Its fine, I just thought there was a chance you would be interested. I will certainly notify you if we need any help, thanks for the offer. -- +++$+++ ::Its fine, I just thought there was a chance you would be interested. I will certainly notify you if we need any help, thanks for the offer. --[[User:EveryDayJoe45|EveryDayJoe45]] ([[User talk:EveryDayJoe45|talk]]) 01:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

19640 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-24 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.206427740E09 +++$+++ I see that plenty of other people have asked you about your \"according to Census 2000\" edits.  I'm quite confused about your source for some of these: [http:\/\/factfinder.census.gov\/servlet\/QTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=16000US1622330&-qr_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_QTP13&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U this] table says that the population of [[Donnelly, Idaho|Donnelly]] was 15.0% American, 13.1% English, 13.7% German, and 5.2% Italian, but your edit says that 20.2% were of [[united states|American]], 14.9% [[germans|German]], 14.0% [[english people|English]] and 7.0% [[italians|Italian]] ancestry according to [[Census 2000]].  And by the way: I'm rather busy currently; would you please reply on my talk page?  Thanks!   +++$+++ I see that plenty of other people have asked you about your "according to Census 2000" edits.  I'm quite confused about your source for some of these: [http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=16000US1622330&-qr_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_QTP13&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U this] table says that the population of [[Donnelly, Idaho|Donnelly]] was 15.0% American, 13.1% English, 13.7% German, and 5.2% Italian, but your edit says that 20.2% were of [[united states|American]], 14.9% [[germans|German]], 14.0% [[english people|English]] and 7.0% [[italians|Italian]] ancestry according to [[Census 2000]].  And by the way: I'm rather busy currently; would you please reply on my talk page?  Thanks!  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 23:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
19641 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19640 +++$+++ 19640 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.206484440E09 +++$+++ Briefly: You get different results depending on whether you base your figures on ''Table PCT16 Ancestry (First ancestry reported)'' (in which case the result can better be compared with the percentage of those reporting Hispanic or Latino ancestry) or on ''Table PCT18 Ancestry (Total categories tallied) for people with one or more ancestry categories reported''. I'll post a reply to your talk page as well.  +++$+++ :Briefly: You get different results depending on whether you base your figures on ''Table PCT16 Ancestry (First ancestry reported)'' (in which case the result can better be compared with the percentage of those reporting Hispanic or Latino ancestry) or on ''Table PCT18 Ancestry (Total categories tallied) for people with one or more ancestry categories reported''. I'll post a reply to your talk page as well. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 15:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
19642 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19640 +++$+++ 19641 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.206493800E09 +++$+++ Could you get me a link to the two pages, say, for Donnelly?  Thanks!   +++$+++ ::Could you get me a link to the two pages, say, for Donnelly?  Thanks!  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 18:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
19643 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19640 +++$+++ 19642 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.206508980E09 +++$+++ Thanks much!   +++$+++ :::Thanks much!  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 22:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

539128 +++$+++ Evlekis +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539128 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.169175000E09 +++$+++ Thanks for extending the entry, those things which you write were just the things which I couldn't get hold of, and I've never been much of one to create extra features beyond plain text! Now the article is alive, I needn't fear that someone will delete it for not being appropriate!  +++$+++ Thanks for extending the entry, those things which you write were just the things which I couldn't get hold of, and I've never been much of one to create extra features beyond plain text! Now the article is alive, I needn't fear that someone will delete it for not being appropriate! [[User:Evlekis|Evlekis]] 18:50, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
539129 +++$+++ Evlekis +++$+++ TodorBozhinov +++$+++ 539128 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.169181720E09 +++$+++ I'm glad I cut a small piece of your work out! I did actually start the very brief [[Gradina, Pleven Province]] article earlier on as well, and as ever, with little information, so you might like to look at that if you're interested and have time. As for the Bulgarian Latinic system and Iskar, it really is no problem. I remember we had a brief discussion some months ago on that issue and you're right, there is no ''common standard'' for transliterating Bulgarian quite as there is Serbian, Macedonian and Montenegrin. The ex-Yugoslav republics were tied up for so long together and their own Latinic systems are based on actual Croatian (even if some Serbian nationalists try to dispute that). But it is there from where you derive the ha\u010dek values for soft consonants, atleast locally; originally this was a Jan Hus creation for the Czech language. Given that you have individual sounds for each letter and that you prefer the \u0161,\u010d and \u017e may suggest that you favour a phonetical system with transliteration too, and that it turn would give you to support a standard character for \u044a, but in all honesty, for now, I personally prefer your ''actual'' system - not the inconsistency (Ruse, Russe, Rouse, Rousse etc), but the general preferences, ie. ts for \u0446, sh for \u0448, and ch for \u0447 etc. The reason is that whilst we have our own first alphabets (Cyrillic), atleast these transliterations are ''English speaker friendly'', in fact it doesn't even have to be English, any language will do, at the moment, the Macedonian\/Serbian transliterations are Bosnian and Croatian friendly! Meaning, we can offer them to learn our languages without having to learn our Cyrillic because they can just use our Latinic instead! A load of rubbish in other words! The fact is, they all cause confusion somewhere down the line. We have in Macedonian LJ for Ljubov (\u0409 \u0443\u0431\u043e\u0432), and the same for BiLJana (\u0411\u0438\u041b \u0408\u0430\u043d\u0430) so I would rather see the former Yugoslav countries drop their pre-1991 habits and adopt the Bulgarian\/Russian model. That's just my feeling though!  +++$+++ ::I'm glad I cut a small piece of your work out! I did actually start the very brief [[Gradina, Pleven Province]] article earlier on as well, and as ever, with little information, so you might like to look at that if you're interested and have time. As for the Bulgarian Latinic system and Iskar, it really is no problem. I remember we had a brief discussion some months ago on that issue and you're right, there is no ''common standard'' for transliterating Bulgarian quite as there is Serbian, Macedonian and Montenegrin. The ex-Yugoslav republics were tied up for so long together and their own Latinic systems are based on actual Croatian (even if some Serbian nationalists try to dispute that). But it is there from where you derive the haček values for soft consonants, atleast locally; originally this was a Jan Hus creation for the Czech language. Given that you have individual sounds for each letter and that you prefer the š,č and ž may suggest that you favour a phonetical system with transliteration too, and that it turn would give you to support a standard character for ъ, but in all honesty, for now, I personally prefer your ''actual'' system - not the inconsistency (Ruse, Russe, Rouse, Rousse etc), but the general preferences, ie. ts for ц, sh for ш, and ch for ч etc. The reason is that whilst we have our own first alphabets (Cyrillic), atleast these transliterations are ''English speaker friendly'', in fact it doesn't even have to be English, any language will do, at the moment, the Macedonian/Serbian transliterations are Bosnian and Croatian friendly! Meaning, we can offer them to learn our languages without having to learn our Cyrillic because they can just use our Latinic instead! A load of rubbish in other words! The fact is, they all cause confusion somewhere down the line. We have in Macedonian LJ for Ljubov (Љ убов), and the same for BiLJana (БиЛ Јана) so I would rather see the former Yugoslav countries drop their pre-1991 habits and adopt the Bulgarian/Russian model. That's just my feeling though! [[User:Evlekis|Evlekis]] 20:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

281786 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-10 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.234327860E09 +++$+++ [[Economy of the Han Dynasty]]; have a look.--<strong> +++$+++ [[Economy of the Han Dynasty]]; have a look.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 20:51, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
281787 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281786 +++$+++ 281786 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.234329600E09 +++$+++ Awesome! I'll digest this piece when I have more time, but I don't think I can help out much because economics was never kind to me...  +++$+++ :Awesome! I'll digest this piece when I have more time, but I don't think I can help out much because economics was never kind to me... [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 21:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
281788 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281786 +++$+++ 281787 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.234329900E09 +++$+++ Don't feel too intimidated by the article; I did not fill it up with a bunch of jargon that only people graduating from [[Harvard Business School]] would understand. Much of the information in the article has to deal with social class, if that makes it easier for you to approach.--<strong> +++$+++ ::Don't feel too intimidated by the article; I did not fill it up with a bunch of jargon that only people graduating from [[Harvard Business School]] would understand. Much of the information in the article has to deal with social class, if that makes it easier for you to approach.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 21:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

281789 +++$+++ KrebMarkt +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-13 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.234586940E09 +++$+++ Cordially -- +++$+++ Cordially --[[User:KrebMarkt|KrebMarkt]] 20:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
281790 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281789 +++$+++ 281789 +++$+++ 2009-02-13 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.234596600E09 +++$+++ I, uh, don't really see what point you're trying to make here.  +++$+++ :I, uh, don't really see what point you're trying to make here. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 23:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
281791 +++$+++ KrebMarkt +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281789 +++$+++ 281790 +++$+++ 2009-02-14 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.234635540E09 +++$+++ My engrish is very bad then :( -- +++$+++ ::My engrish is very bad then :( --[[User:KrebMarkt|KrebMarkt]] 10:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
281792 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281789 +++$+++ 281791 +++$+++ 2009-02-14 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.234674480E09 +++$+++ I'll keep participating in the Wikiproject so don't you worry :)  +++$+++ :::I'll keep participating in the Wikiproject so don't you worry :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 21:08, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

19648 +++$+++ Atlantabravz +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19648 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-28 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.227942780E09 +++$+++ Where did you get that [[Lorrie Morgan]] is a Welsh-American enough to add that category?  +++$+++ Where did you get that [[Lorrie Morgan]] is a Welsh-American enough to add that category? [[User:Atlantabravz|Atlantabravz]] ([[User talk:Atlantabravz|talk]]) 23:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
19649 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19648 +++$+++ 19648 +++$+++ 2008-11-29 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.227982380E09 +++$+++ Morgan is a surname of Welsh origin. In many cases European immigrants have anglicized their names (Schmidt became Smith, Mueller became Miller, Nilsson and Nilsen became Nelson and so on), but Morgan is not a name of that type. Excluding African Americans (most of whom adopted Anglo-Saxon or Celtic surnames upon their emancipation after the Civil War), it's almost certain that any American born as a Morgan is at least partially of Welsh ancestry. Here's an article about the Morgans: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Morgan_(surname). +++$+++ :Morgan is a surname of Welsh origin. In many cases European immigrants have anglicized their names (Schmidt became Smith, Mueller became Miller, Nilsson and Nilsen became Nelson and so on), but Morgan is not a name of that type. Excluding African Americans (most of whom adopted Anglo-Saxon or Celtic surnames upon their emancipation after the Civil War), it's almost certain that any American born as a Morgan is at least partially of Welsh ancestry. Here's an article about the Morgans: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan_(surname).[[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 10:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
19650 +++$+++ EdJohnston +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19648 +++$+++ 19649 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.228223580E09 +++$+++ The claim that [[Lorrie Morgan]] is Welsh-American needs to be justified by information that is included in her article. Presumably, that will take the form of a reference to a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. ''Excluding African Americans... it's almost certain that any American born as a Morgan is at least partially of Welsh ancestry.'' A sweeping statement like that one needs a reference, in my opinion.  +++$+++ ::The claim that [[Lorrie Morgan]] is Welsh-American needs to be justified by information that is included in her article. Presumably, that will take the form of a reference to a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. ''Excluding African Americans... it's almost certain that any American born as a Morgan is at least partially of Welsh ancestry.'' A sweeping statement like that one needs a reference, in my opinion. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 05:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
19651 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19648 +++$+++ 19650 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.228233300E09 +++$+++ Someone's surname says something (possibly) about the nationality of their great-great-great-....- grandfather, but nothing about the other 63, 127, 255 or whatever of their ancestors.  And that's assuming that none of those male ancestors changed their name for any reason.  Not safe grounds for assigning a category.  +++$+++ :::Someone's surname says something (possibly) about the nationality of their great-great-great-....- grandfather, but nothing about the other 63, 127, 255 or whatever of their ancestors.  And that's assuming that none of those male ancestors changed their name for any reason.  Not safe grounds for assigning a category. [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD|talk]]) 07:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

281793 +++$+++ Juhachi +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281793 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-07 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.236448200E09 +++$+++ I saw in the edit history of [[List of Touhou Project characters]] that you thought this particular story from the ''[[Kojiki]]'' should get an article, but I see that no other stories from the book are articles on Wikipedia. Is this story somehow more notable than all the other stories to deserve its own article? Otherwise, I don't really see a reason why the story can't be redirected to [[Kojiki]].--<span style=\"background:white;color:\"> +++$+++ I saw in the edit history of [[List of Touhou Project characters]] that you thought this particular story from the ''[[Kojiki]]'' should get an article, but I see that no other stories from the book are articles on Wikipedia. Is this story somehow more notable than all the other stories to deserve its own article? Otherwise, I don't really see a reason why the story can't be redirected to [[Kojiki]].--<span style="background:white;color:">[[User:Juhachi|'''<font color="black">十</font>''']][[User talk:Juhachi|'''<font color="red">八</font>''']]</span> 09:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
281794 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281793 +++$+++ 281793 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.236449340E09 +++$+++ It is a pretty famous story in Japan. I believe that myths from the Kojiki are not made articles not because they are not important, but rather that people have not gotten around to make them. (East Asian mythology and folklore coverage can get quite spotty here on English Wikipedia). There are plenty of characters from the Kojiki that received articles, though. Back to the rabbit itself, it is notable because it plays a role in the [[\u014ckuninushi]] myths, and it is revered as a god and worshipped in [[:ja:\u767d\u514e\u795e\u793e|a shrine]]. Ja wiki has an article on it [[:ja:\u56e0\u5e61\u306e\u767d\u514e]].  +++$+++ :It is a pretty famous story in Japan. I believe that myths from the Kojiki are not made articles not because they are not important, but rather that people have not gotten around to make them. (East Asian mythology and folklore coverage can get quite spotty here on English Wikipedia). There are plenty of characters from the Kojiki that received articles, though. Back to the rabbit itself, it is notable because it plays a role in the [[Ōkuninushi]] myths, and it is revered as a god and worshipped in [[:ja:白兎神社|a shrine]]. Ja wiki has an article on it [[:ja:因幡の白兎]]. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 10:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
281795 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281793 +++$+++ 281794 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.236449460E09 +++$+++ While we are on the topic of Touhou (tangentially), do you want to help me make the rest of the game articles?  +++$+++ ::While we are on the topic of Touhou (tangentially), do you want to help me make the rest of the game articles? [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 10:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
281796 +++$+++ Juhachi +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281793 +++$+++ 281795 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.236458760E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure I'd really be qualified. I've played all the game sans IaMP and SWR, though I'm not sure how to describe the gameplay between the various games, and have no knowledge of any development info. Besides that, I know little about the actual plots. Looking at [[Mountain of Faith]] as an example, I'm uncertain that I'd be able to contribute anything substantial for future articles (or even to the existing ones, since I've never edited any of them substantially if I remember correctly). As for the White Hare, I'll agree now that an article seems worthwhile.--<span style=\"background:white;color:\"> +++$+++ :::I'm not sure I'd really be qualified. I've played all the game sans IaMP and SWR, though I'm not sure how to describe the gameplay between the various games, and have no knowledge of any development info. Besides that, I know little about the actual plots. Looking at [[Mountain of Faith]] as an example, I'm uncertain that I'd be able to contribute anything substantial for future articles (or even to the existing ones, since I've never edited any of them substantially if I remember correctly). As for the White Hare, I'll agree now that an article seems worthwhile.--<span style="background:white;color:">[[User:Juhachi|'''<font color="black">十</font>''']][[User talk:Juhachi|'''<font color="red">八</font>''']]</span> 12:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
281797 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281793 +++$+++ 281796 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.236493380E09 +++$+++ That's too bad then, I could use some help since I had been doing this alone for the past few years...! (Going at a painfully slow rate of 2 new Touhou articles per year) I also plan to make articles for the two official Touhou manga series and finally rewrite a portion of the [[Touhou Project]] article, so who knows when I'll finish! =D  +++$+++ ::::That's too bad then, I could use some help since I had been doing this alone for the past few years...! (Going at a painfully slow rate of 2 new Touhou articles per year) I also plan to make articles for the two official Touhou manga series and finally rewrite a portion of the [[Touhou Project]] article, so who knows when I'll finish! =D [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 22:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

19652 +++$+++ PamD +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-30 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.228080720E09 +++$+++ Why are you removing this useful template from pages, while you are usefully categorising them by surname nationality?  The footnote it generates is useful, and I think it also means that the article is recognised by various bots as a disambiguation-type page so doesn't get tagged as a stub etc.  +++$+++ Why are you removing this useful template from pages, while you are usefully categorising them by surname nationality?  The footnote it generates is useful, and I think it also means that the article is recognised by various bots as a disambiguation-type page so doesn't get tagged as a stub etc. [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD|talk]]) 13:32, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
19653 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19652 +++$+++ 19652 +++$+++ 2008-11-30 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.228081200E09 +++$+++ The reason I removed it from a number of pages was that it seemed redundant, but you ''do'' have a point. I'll leave it from now on.  +++$+++ :The reason I removed it from a number of pages was that it seemed redundant, but you ''do'' have a point. I'll leave it from now on. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 13:40, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

19654 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19654 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-01 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.228199400E09 +++$+++ Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}.  This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents]] regarding your categorisation of articles based on surnames. The thread is [[WP:ANI#Request to look at Monegasque|here]].  {{#if:|The discussion is about the topic [[:{{{1}}}]].}}  <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.  +++$+++ Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}.  This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding your categorisation of articles based on surnames. The thread is [[WP:ANI#Request to look at Monegasque|here]].  {{#if:|The discussion is about the topic [[:{{{1}}}]].}}  <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 22:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
19655 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19654 +++$+++ 19654 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.228242960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. +++$+++ :Thanks.[[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 10:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

281799 +++$+++ LonelyMarble +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281799 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-23 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.237869180E09 +++$+++ Hi, I see you reverted my removal of her images in some articles. I suppose an example of an anime-style drawing of the fashion in question in [[miko]], [[japanese school uniform]], and [[Gothic Lolita]] is okay for now. You're right that there's no need to mention it's Wikipe-tan at all and therefore it's okay. I also kept her image at [[baro't saya]] since that's the only image there, and [[moe anthropomorphism]] is one of the few places it would be appropriate to actually mention Wikipe-tan. The one revision of yours I was going to contest was the image at [[fan service]] but I see someone already undid that. Wikipe-tan in this case is not part of a fictional storyline or anything so it really has nothing to do with the topic, unlike the fashion articles where she's actually wearing the said fashion. The one thing I ask is, if a better example of a free anime\/culture image of one of those fashion styles becomes available, would you mind if it was replaced with the Wikipe-tan image? It would be nice to have an image mentioned in the text of those \"anime\/culture\" sections, although that may be hard since most of them are copyrighted.  +++$+++ Hi, I see you reverted my removal of her images in some articles. I suppose an example of an anime-style drawing of the fashion in question in [[miko]], [[japanese school uniform]], and [[Gothic Lolita]] is okay for now. You're right that there's no need to mention it's Wikipe-tan at all and therefore it's okay. I also kept her image at [[baro't saya]] since that's the only image there, and [[moe anthropomorphism]] is one of the few places it would be appropriate to actually mention Wikipe-tan. The one revision of yours I was going to contest was the image at [[fan service]] but I see someone already undid that. Wikipe-tan in this case is not part of a fictional storyline or anything so it really has nothing to do with the topic, unlike the fashion articles where she's actually wearing the said fashion. The one thing I ask is, if a better example of a free anime/culture image of one of those fashion styles becomes available, would you mind if it was replaced with the Wikipe-tan image? It would be nice to have an image mentioned in the text of those "anime/culture" sections, although that may be hard since most of them are copyrighted. [[User:LonelyMarble|LonelyMarble]] ([[User talk:LonelyMarble|talk]]) 21:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
281800 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281799 +++$+++ 281799 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.237870140E09 +++$+++ The bikini Wikipe-tan, I admit, isn't really fanservice since it is not from a piece of fiction servicing its fans, but then I saw the caption that was there and thought, \"well, that might work\". Then I saw someone reverted me for being OR, which I agree to, so I left it alone. I wouldn't mind if free anime images replaces the Wikipe-tan images, though I don't really think it is necessary other than readers wondering what is up with that girl who dyed her hair blue and put puzzle pieces in her hair.  +++$+++ :The bikini Wikipe-tan, I admit, isn't really fanservice since it is not from a piece of fiction servicing its fans, but then I saw the caption that was there and thought, "well, that might work". Then I saw someone reverted me for being OR, which I agree to, so I left it alone. I wouldn't mind if free anime images replaces the Wikipe-tan images, though I don't really think it is necessary other than readers wondering what is up with that girl who dyed her hair blue and put puzzle pieces in her hair. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 21:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
281801 +++$+++ LonelyMarble +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281799 +++$+++ 281800 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.237872300E09 +++$+++ What I mean by replacing Wikipe-tan is, take the cultural significance section of [[Japanese school uniform]] for an example. A better image than the Wikipe-tan one could be an image of a modified uniform or an image of the outfit of B\u014ds\u014dzoku biker gangs. Or for an anime image, an image of a character actually featured in anime or manga would be better than Wikipe-tan, but most actual characters are copyrighted which is the problem. Basically an image that is described in the text is best, but a generic anime art image is fine for now I guess.  +++$+++ ::What I mean by replacing Wikipe-tan is, take the cultural significance section of [[Japanese school uniform]] for an example. A better image than the Wikipe-tan one could be an image of a modified uniform or an image of the outfit of Bōsōzoku biker gangs. Or for an anime image, an image of a character actually featured in anime or manga would be better than Wikipe-tan, but most actual characters are copyrighted which is the problem. Basically an image that is described in the text is best, but a generic anime art image is fine for now I guess. [[User:LonelyMarble|LonelyMarble]] ([[User talk:LonelyMarble|talk]]) 22:25, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
281802 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281799 +++$+++ 281801 +++$+++ 2009-03-23 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.237873020E09 +++$+++ Yeah, the reason these Wikipe-tan images exist in the first place is because people wanted anime art in those articles but cannot use copyrighted characters. I agree that the image should relate to what is being described by the adjacent text as much as possible, but sometimes we'll just have to make do with what we have.  +++$+++ :::Yeah, the reason these Wikipe-tan images exist in the first place is because people wanted anime art in those articles but cannot use copyrighted characters. I agree that the image should relate to what is being described by the adjacent text as much as possible, but sometimes we'll just have to make do with what we have. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 22:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

19656 +++$+++ Rklear +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-18 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.229644200E09 +++$+++ Hello. I noticed that you were adding religious affiliation to articles on certain American subjects and that, in doing so, you listed [[Philip Pendleton Barbour]] as Episcopalian. Please note that [[Episcopalian]] is a disambiguation page (actually, a redirect to one) and should not be linked to from articles. I changed this particular case to <nowiki>[[Episcopal Church (United States) |Episcopalian]]<\/nowiki>. You may want to do that with other Episcopalians you encounter.  +++$+++ Hello. I noticed that you were adding religious affiliation to articles on certain American subjects and that, in doing so, you listed [[Philip Pendleton Barbour]] as Episcopalian. Please note that [[Episcopalian]] is a disambiguation page (actually, a redirect to one) and should not be linked to from articles. I changed this particular case to <nowiki>[[Episcopal Church (United States) |Episcopalian]]</nowiki>. You may want to do that with other Episcopalians you encounter. [[User:Rklear|Rklear]] ([[User talk:Rklear|talk]]) 15:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
19657 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19656 +++$+++ 19656 +++$+++ 2008-12-18 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.229644440E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I hadn't noticed that.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I hadn't noticed that. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 15:54, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

19658 +++$+++ Ccwaters +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19658 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-13 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.231884840E09 +++$+++ Why are you removing The countries from hockey players biographical info. If there's a MOS you are acting on, please provide it. Thanks  +++$+++ Why are you removing The countries from hockey players biographical info. If there's a MOS you are acting on, please provide it. Thanks [[User:Ccwaters|ccwaters]] ([[User talk:Ccwaters|talk]]) 14:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
19659 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19658 +++$+++ 19658 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.231888380E09 +++$+++ I'm not removing the countries as such. The point is that if you mention that somebody was born in, say, Lansing, Michigan, it's ''totally'' unnecessary and redundant to add \"United States\", since everybody who is able to read these articles knows that Michigan is a U.S. state. The [[Simple English Wikipedia]] might be a different case... Besides, the nationality of the player is always mentioned anyway: \"John Doe is an American ice hockey player from Lansing, Michigan\" and so on. To resume: stating in every article about an ice hockey player from Michigan (or any other state) that Michigan (Oregon, Massachusetts etc) is situated in the United States of America, as if everybody didn't know that already, provides ''absolutely'' no new information, gives a somewhat irritating impression of underestimating the reader's mental capacity and looks just plain cluttery. If there ''really'' is somebody out there who doesn't know which country this strange and never-heard-of \"State of Michigan\" belongs to, the surprising truth (\"Wow, Michigan is actually  in ''America''! I had no idea. I gotta tell all my friends...\") can easily be found out by a single click. If you check out the articles about, say, American politicians, you'll find out that they normally follow the pattern \"born in Lansing, Michigan\", without adding \"United States of America\", for the simple reason that it can safely be assumed that nearly every reader already knows that Michigan is a U.S. state. I know that that in articles about sportspeople it isn't uncommon at all to find redundant mentions about Michigan, Virginia etc being U.S. states, but the fact that a practice is common doesn't necessarily mean that it makes any sense. And the pattern \"born in Lansing, Michigan, United States of America\" (Instead of \"born in Lansing, Michigan\", the pattern you'd normally expect) makes absolutely no rational sense at all. A good rule of thumb is that unnecessary information and clutter should be avoided.  +++$+++ :I'm not removing the countries as such. The point is that if you mention that somebody was born in, say, Lansing, Michigan, it's ''totally'' unnecessary and redundant to add "United States", since everybody who is able to read these articles knows that Michigan is a U.S. state. The [[Simple English Wikipedia]] might be a different case... Besides, the nationality of the player is always mentioned anyway: "John Doe is an American ice hockey player from Lansing, Michigan" and so on. To resume: stating in every article about an ice hockey player from Michigan (or any other state) that Michigan (Oregon, Massachusetts etc) is situated in the United States of America, as if everybody didn't know that already, provides ''absolutely'' no new information, gives a somewhat irritating impression of underestimating the reader's mental capacity and looks just plain cluttery. If there ''really'' is somebody out there who doesn't know which country this strange and never-heard-of "State of Michigan" belongs to, the surprising truth ("Wow, Michigan is actually  in ''America''! I had no idea. I gotta tell all my friends...") can easily be found out by a single click. If you check out the articles about, say, American politicians, you'll find out that they normally follow the pattern "born in Lansing, Michigan", without adding "United States of America", for the simple reason that it can safely be assumed that nearly every reader already knows that Michigan is a U.S. state. I know that that in articles about sportspeople it isn't uncommon at all to find redundant mentions about Michigan, Virginia etc being U.S. states, but the fact that a practice is common doesn't necessarily mean that it makes any sense. And the pattern "born in Lansing, Michigan, United States of America" (Instead of "born in Lansing, Michigan", the pattern you'd normally expect) makes absolutely no rational sense at all. A good rule of thumb is that unnecessary information and clutter should be avoided. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 15:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
19660 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19658 +++$+++ 19659 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.231890660E09 +++$+++ BTW: As the question about whether one should write \"born in Lansing, Michigan\" or \"born in Lansing, Michigan, United States of America\" doesn't really rank among my top priorities, I haven't embarked on any campaign to use the simpler pattern in every article about an American ice hockey player. I've just simplified the pattern in a number of articles where I've added a category about their county or city of origin. As far as I can remember, I have made no changes to articles which already have that category. My main interest lately has been the category \"County of origin\"\/\"City of origin\", not the pattern we've just been discussing. +++$+++ ::BTW: As the question about whether one should write "born in Lansing, Michigan" or "born in Lansing, Michigan, United States of America" doesn't really rank among my top priorities, I haven't embarked on any campaign to use the simpler pattern in every article about an American ice hockey player. I've just simplified the pattern in a number of articles where I've added a category about their county or city of origin. As far as I can remember, I have made no changes to articles which already have that category. My main interest lately has been the category "County of origin"/"City of origin", not the pattern we've just been discussing.[[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 15:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
19661 +++$+++ Ccwaters +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19658 +++$+++ 19660 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.231891680E09 +++$+++ I always thought the MoS  was to provide the country as a effort to be less Northamerican-centric (see also Canada). Sorry, I don't have a link on that. Can you hold off on those for a bit while I try to find it? I have no issue with your category removals.  +++$+++ :::I always thought the MoS  was to provide the country as a effort to be less Northamerican-centric (see also Canada). Sorry, I don't have a link on that. Can you hold off on those for a bit while I try to find it? I have no issue with your category removals. [[User:Ccwaters|ccwaters]] ([[User talk:Ccwaters|talk]]) 16:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
19662 +++$+++ Ccwaters +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19658 +++$+++ 19660 +++$+++ 2009-01-13 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.231892820E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style#American_.28and_Canadian.29_geographic_name_MoS]]. I'll go from there. Quite honestly, I don't really care either way. So, if this mythical MoS I referenced doesn't exist, I'm not going to stop you from continuing.  +++$+++ :::[[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style#American_.28and_Canadian.29_geographic_name_MoS]]. I'll go from there. Quite honestly, I don't really care either way. So, if this mythical MoS I referenced doesn't exist, I'm not going to stop you from continuing. [[User:Ccwaters|ccwaters]] ([[User talk:Ccwaters|talk]]) 16:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
19663 +++$+++ Ccwaters +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19658 +++$+++ 19662 +++$+++ 2009-01-15 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.232055660E09 +++$+++ I guess that MoS was in my head. Thanks for cooperating though.  +++$+++ ::::I guess that MoS was in my head. Thanks for cooperating though. [[User:Ccwaters|ccwaters]] ([[User talk:Ccwaters|talk]]) 13:41, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
19664 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19658 +++$+++ 19663 +++$+++ 2009-01-15 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.232055960E09 +++$+++ No sweat.  +++$+++ :::::No sweat. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 13:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

281804 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281804 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-25 01:22:00 +++$+++ 1.237969320E09 +++$+++ Look what I did to [[Han Dynasty]]. It is basically now a gigantic five-partite summary of five other sub or branch articles dealing with the Han: History, Society and Culture, Government, Economics, and Science and Technology (with the main articles given proper links at the head of each section). Enjoy.--<strong> +++$+++ Look what I did to [[Han Dynasty]]. It is basically now a gigantic five-partite summary of five other sub or branch articles dealing with the Han: History, Society and Culture, Government, Economics, and Science and Technology (with the main articles given proper links at the head of each section). Enjoy.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 01:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
281805 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281804 +++$+++ 281804 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.237973940E09 +++$+++ Wow...I'm at loss for words. Just...astonishing. I'll read the whole thing in depth later to see if any changes need to be made.  +++$+++ :Wow...I'm at loss for words. Just...astonishing. I'll read the whole thing in depth later to see if any changes need to be made. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 02:39, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
281806 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281804 +++$+++ 281805 +++$+++ 2009-03-26 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.238115000E09 +++$+++ Cool, just to let you know, I added some new pictures to the article too. It looks very clean-cut.--<strong> +++$+++ ::Cool, just to let you know, I added some new pictures to the article too. It looks very clean-cut.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 17:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
281807 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281804 +++$+++ 281806 +++$+++ 2009-03-26 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.238123640E09 +++$+++ Cool.  +++$+++ :::Cool. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 20:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

543950 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543950 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-27 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.177721460E09 +++$+++ I really appreciate what you're doing with the article.  I spent a considerable amount of time reviewing each of the references and removing some bad writing a few weeks ago, then we got an editor in there who went to town with a Creationist POV everywhere.  It looks like a lot of that stuff has either been reverted or rewritten.  I was once in your shoes 30 years ago, but now I haven't picked up a biochemistry book or paper in many years.  Anyways, thanks.  BTW, why did you protect the article?  I haven't noticed vandalism lately.   +++$+++ I really appreciate what you're doing with the article.  I spent a considerable amount of time reviewing each of the references and removing some bad writing a few weeks ago, then we got an editor in there who went to town with a Creationist POV everywhere.  It looks like a lot of that stuff has either been reverted or rewritten.  I was once in your shoes 30 years ago, but now I haven't picked up a biochemistry book or paper in many years.  Anyways, thanks.  BTW, why did you protect the article?  I haven't noticed vandalism lately.  [[User:Orangemarlin|Orangemarlin]] 17:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
543951 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543950 +++$+++ 543950 +++$+++ 2007-04-30 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.177926960E09 +++$+++ If at all possible, when you complete an activity on the to-do list, please strike it out.  Let's get this article to FA status!!!!  Thanks for all that you're doing..   +++$+++ :If at all possible, when you complete an activity on the to-do list, please strike it out.  Let's get this article to FA status!!!!  Thanks for all that you're doing..  [[User:Orangemarlin|Orangemarlin]] 02:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

543952 +++$+++ Corvus cornix +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-30 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.177998240E09 +++$+++ They could always argue on their Talk page, but if the article winds up being deleted, can they be blocked?   +++$+++ They could always argue on their Talk page, but if the article winds up being deleted, can they be blocked?  [[User:Corvus cornix|Corvus cornix]] 22:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
543953 +++$+++ Corvus cornix +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543952 +++$+++ 543952 +++$+++ 2007-04-30 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.177998480E09 +++$+++ Yeah, their user name is what I was concerned about.  Just like [[User:genesisfoundation]], another COI user name.   +++$+++ :Yeah, their user name is what I was concerned about.  Just like [[User:genesisfoundation]], another COI user name.  [[User:Corvus cornix|Corvus cornix]] 22:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

19665 +++$+++ Stepheng3 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19665 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-02 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.233568500E09 +++$+++ I notice that you recently  blanked several categories that you created yourself.  If your intention is to delete them, you can save time and steps by applying the {{tl|db-author}} template to the page.  This works as long as there are no significant contributors other than yourself, which is often the case with categories.  The thing is, only administrators can delete categories, and they tend to be busy people.  Simply blanking the page is less likely to get their attention.  -  +++$+++ I notice that you recently  blanked several categories that you created yourself.  If your intention is to delete them, you can save time and steps by applying the {{tl|db-author}} template to the page.  This works as long as there are no significant contributors other than yourself, which is often the case with categories.  The thing is, only administrators can delete categories, and they tend to be busy people.  Simply blanking the page is less likely to get their attention.  - [[User:Stepheng3|Stepheng3]] ([[User talk:Stepheng3|talk]]) 01:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
19666 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19665 +++$+++ 19665 +++$+++ 2009-02-02 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.233626160E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 17:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

281810 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281810 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-06 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.239050100E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Naming_laws_in_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China&diff=next&oldid=282070309] Sorry about that one&mdash;I was piping categories en masse and looks like I got confused on that page.  Thanks for catching me. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naming_laws_in_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China&diff=next&oldid=282070309] Sorry about that one&mdash;I was piping categories en masse and looks like I got confused on that page.  Thanks for catching me. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 13:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
281811 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281810 +++$+++ 281810 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.239081900E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. It was no biggie.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. It was no biggie. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 22:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

543955 +++$+++ Dysmorodrepanis +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-02 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.178173500E09 +++$+++ Can you (or did you) check the articles out? I dropped the refs into DNA and at the \"mechanical porperties\" (or whatnot) article also. I didn't want to dig through the entirety of them, but they may be interesting... one shows that G is essential for B DNA being the default conformation; C-G-poor stretches apparently avoid it. The other is about circumstances under which ligands can induce A-like conformation. I might have some more refs, which I will also drop off there.  +++$+++ Can you (or did you) check the articles out? I dropped the refs into DNA and at the "mechanical porperties" (or whatnot) article also. I didn't want to dig through the entirety of them, but they may be interesting... one shows that G is essential for B DNA being the default conformation; C-G-poor stretches apparently avoid it. The other is about circumstances under which ligands can induce A-like conformation. I might have some more refs, which I will also drop off there. [[User:Dysmorodrepanis|Dysmorodrepanis]] 23:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
543956 +++$+++ Dysmorodrepanis +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543955 +++$+++ 543955 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.178175360E09 +++$+++ [rm crud] I don't see the thing to click on?!  +++$+++ :[rm crud] I don't see the thing to click on?! [[User:Dysmorodrepanis|Dysmorodrepanis]] 23:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

281812 +++$+++ Jay +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281812 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-07 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.239114780E09 +++$+++ Hello, you redirected [[Chow Tse-ming]] to [[Kashmir Princess]] with comment \"notable for one event only\". Is it policy to redirect such biographies? Can you point me to the relevant policy page.  +++$+++ Hello, you redirected [[Chow Tse-ming]] to [[Kashmir Princess]] with comment "notable for one event only". Is it policy to redirect such biographies? Can you point me to the relevant policy page. [[User:Jay|Jay]] ([[User talk:Jay|talk]]) 07:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
281813 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281812 +++$+++ 281812 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.239114840E09 +++$+++ Here. [[WP:ONEEVENT]]  +++$+++ :Here. [[WP:ONEEVENT]] [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 07:34, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
281814 +++$+++ Jay +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281812 +++$+++ 281813 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.239128160E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I didn't know that.  +++$+++ ::Thanks! I didn't know that. [[User:Jay|Jay]] ([[User talk:Jay|talk]]) 11:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

19669 +++$+++ Cgingold +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-04 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.236166860E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've been going through the articles in [[:Category:Congressional opponents of the Iraq War]] because another editor has taken it to CFD asking for deletion. I'm hoping to save the category, so I want to be sure that nobody is listed who doesn't really belong there. I noticed that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Jeff_Bingaman&diff=255914097&oldid=253009360 you added Jeff Bingaman] to the category -- but there's no mention of Iraq in the article, so it would help if you could add info to support the category, otherwise I'll have to remove it. Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi, I've been going through the articles in [[:Category:Congressional opponents of the Iraq War]] because another editor has taken it to CFD asking for deletion. I'm hoping to save the category, so I want to be sure that nobody is listed who doesn't really belong there. I noticed that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeff_Bingaman&diff=255914097&oldid=253009360 you added Jeff Bingaman] to the category -- but there's no mention of Iraq in the article, so it would help if you could add info to support the category, otherwise I'll have to remove it. Thanks! [[User:Cgingold|Cgingold]] ([[User talk:Cgingold|talk]]) 03:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
19670 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19669 +++$+++ 19669 +++$+++ 2009-03-04 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.236189120E09 +++$+++ That's easy. This [http:\/\/www.senate.gov\/legislative\/LIS\/roll_call_lists\/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237] shows that Bingaman was among those who voted against authorizing the war in the first place. It isn't exactly classified information. It is, rather, very literally ''a matter of public record''. The corresponding list for the House can be found here: [http:\/\/clerk.house.gov\/evs\/2002\/roll455.xml]. These lists are very useful for making the distinction between those who opposed the war from the outset from those who merely jumped on the anti-war bandwagon afterwards, when it turned out that things didn't go quite as smoothly as they'd expected.  +++$+++ :That's easy. This [http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237] shows that Bingaman was among those who voted against authorizing the war in the first place. It isn't exactly classified information. It is, rather, very literally ''a matter of public record''. The corresponding list for the House can be found here: [http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll455.xml]. These lists are very useful for making the distinction between those who opposed the war from the outset from those who merely jumped on the anti-war bandwagon afterwards, when it turned out that things didn't go quite as smoothly as they'd expected. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 09:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

543959 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-04 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.178331120E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim. I noticed you semi-protected [[Malaria]] but didn't add a template to this effect (e.g. {{tl|pp-semi-vandalism}}). I took the liberty of doing so\xe2\x80\x94if there was a reason why you hadn't, I apologize, and feel free to revert my edit. Best,  +++$+++ Hi Tim. I noticed you semi-protected [[Malaria]] but didn't add a template to this effect (e.g. {{tl|pp-semi-vandalism}}). I took the liberty of doing soâif there was a reason why you hadn't, I apologize, and feel free to revert my edit. Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]Â·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 19:12, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
543960 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543959 +++$+++ 543959 +++$+++ 2007-05-04 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.178331540E09 +++$+++ No problem :)  +++$+++ :No problem :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]Â·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 19:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

281816 +++$+++ Enerelt +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281816 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-24 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.243167900E09 +++$+++ Hi! I don't understand why you don't like the term world conquests. But if you terrorize me!, I say Wikipedia is not your propery. As you know I've never ruined any article. Cheers-- +++$+++ Hi! I don't understand why you don't like the term world conquests. But if you terrorize me!, I say Wikipedia is not your propery. As you know I've never ruined any article. Cheers--[[User:Enerelt|Enerelt]] ([[User talk:Enerelt|talk]]) 05:25, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
281817 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281816 +++$+++ 281816 +++$+++ 2009-05-24 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.243168260E09 +++$+++ I have stated my reasons on the edit summary every time, and each time you revert you have failed to do the same. If we can all sit down to discuss it'll be the most welcomed. I also return your kind warning that we do not [[WP:OWN|own anything on Wikipedia]], templates included. I appreciate your hard work on Mongolian history and I understand that you take tremendous pride in your ancestors, but correctness takes priority. Cheers.  +++$+++ :I have stated my reasons on the edit summary every time, and each time you revert you have failed to do the same. If we can all sit down to discuss it'll be the most welcomed. I also return your kind warning that we do not [[WP:OWN|own anything on Wikipedia]], templates included. I appreciate your hard work on Mongolian history and I understand that you take tremendous pride in your ancestors, but correctness takes priority. Cheers. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 05:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
281818 +++$+++ Enerelt +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281816 +++$+++ 281817 +++$+++ 2009-05-30 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.243696920E09 +++$+++ I guess we reached deal. Sorry, man, for disturbing you.-- +++$+++ ::I guess we reached deal. Sorry, man, for disturbing you.--[[User:Enerelt|Enerelt]] ([[User talk:Enerelt|talk]]) 08:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
281819 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281816 +++$+++ 281818 +++$+++ 2009-05-30 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.243706340E09 +++$+++ It's all right. I'm glad you understand.  +++$+++ :::It's all right. I'm glad you understand. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 10:59, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
281820 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281816 +++$+++ 281816 +++$+++ 2009-06-02 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.244003520E09 +++$+++ You edited the paragraph on [[Romance of the Three Kingdoms (game)]], not Dynasty Warriors, man. Calling him \"faggoty\" is hardly appropriate either.  +++$+++ :You edited the paragraph on [[Romance of the Three Kingdoms (game)]], not Dynasty Warriors, man. Calling him "faggoty" is hardly appropriate either. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 21:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

19674 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-22 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.242994140E09 +++$+++ Cheers  +++$+++ Cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 05:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
19675 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19674 +++$+++ 19674 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.242994440E09 +++$+++ Those are two different things altogether. \"[[Acehnese people]]\" is an ethnic category, whereas \"People from Aceh\" is a geographical one. All people from Aceh aren't \"Acehnese\" in the ethnic sense of the word.  +++$+++ :Those are two different things altogether. "[[Acehnese people]]" is an ethnic category, whereas "People from Aceh" is a geographical one. All people from Aceh aren't "Acehnese" in the ethnic sense of the word. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 05:14, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

543964 +++$+++ David D. +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543964 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-07 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.178599860E09 +++$+++ Hey Tim, i was looking at [[:Image:Catabolism schematic.svg|this figure]] in [[metabolism]] article and it seem to be a little confusing.  I understand that accuracy is lost when trying to simplfy the process but what did you have in mind with respect to the proteins being broken down into acetyl coA? It would seem that the better thing to do with this figure would be to have the arrow pointing to the TCA cycle as an entry point rather than acetyl CoA?  +++$+++ Hey Tim, i was looking at [[:Image:Catabolism schematic.svg|this figure]] in [[metabolism]] article and it seem to be a little confusing.  I understand that accuracy is lost when trying to simplfy the process but what did you have in mind with respect to the proteins being broken down into acetyl coA? It would seem that the better thing to do with this figure would be to have the arrow pointing to the TCA cycle as an entry point rather than acetyl CoA? [[User:David D.|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.|(Talk)]] 21:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
543965 +++$+++ David D. +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543964 +++$+++ 543964 +++$+++ 2007-05-07 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.178600220E09 +++$+++ Alternatively add pyruvate and have three arrows from the protein route to pyruvate, acetyl CoA and TCA cycle. Then you could add the glycerol to pyruvate arrow from the lipid catabolism route too. Or is this just too complicated to capture? On the other hand this is fairly complex and might be worth showing in a diagramatic form. One of the major themes in metabolism is that itis a network rather than linear pathways so this might help emphasise this point.  +++$+++ :Alternatively add pyruvate and have three arrows from the protein route to pyruvate, acetyl CoA and TCA cycle. Then you could add the glycerol to pyruvate arrow from the lipid catabolism route too. Or is this just too complicated to capture? On the other hand this is fairly complex and might be worth showing in a diagramatic form. One of the major themes in metabolism is that itis a network rather than linear pathways so this might help emphasise this point. [[User:David D.|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.|(Talk)]] 21:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

281821 +++$+++ Collectonian +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281821 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-21 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.245586980E09 +++$+++ As a major contributor to ''[[Higurashi no Naku Koro ni]]'', I thought you'd want to know that that article is currently under going a [[WP:GAR|Good Article Reassessment]] as part of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles\/Project quality task force\/Sweeps|GA Sweeps]]. The article currently fails the [[WP:GAC|good article criteria]], as detailed at [[Talk:Higurashi no Naku Koro ni\/GA1]]. Its reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time for the issues to be addressed. Thanks. --  +++$+++ As a major contributor to ''[[Higurashi no Naku Koro ni]]'', I thought you'd want to know that that article is currently under going a [[WP:GAR|Good Article Reassessment]] as part of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps|GA Sweeps]]. The article currently fails the [[WP:GAC|good article criteria]], as detailed at [[Talk:Higurashi no Naku Koro ni/GA1]]. Its reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time for the issues to be addressed. Thanks. -- [[User:Collectonian|<span style='font-family: "Comic Sans MS"; color:#5342F'>Collectonian</span>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Collectonian|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 05:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
281822 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281821 +++$+++ 281821 +++$+++ 2009-07-03 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.246687620E09 +++$+++ You're welcome.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 23:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

19678 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-22 09:06:00 +++$+++ 1.243008360E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" |Monegasque - for tireless help to the Indonesian project for cleaning up and improving  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" |Monegasque - for tireless help to the Indonesian project for cleaning up and improving [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 09:06, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
19679 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19678 +++$+++ 19678 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 09:07:00 +++$+++ 1.243008420E09 +++$+++ Thanks...  +++$+++ :Thanks... [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 09:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
19680 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19678 +++$+++ 19679 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.243008600E09 +++$+++ You deserve it - such persistent improving in any one project is rarely done these days (as far as I can tell) - so thanks  +++$+++ ::You deserve it - such persistent improving in any one project is rarely done these days (as far as I can tell) - so thanks [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 09:10, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
19681 +++$+++ Davidelit +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19678 +++$+++ 19680 +++$+++ 2009-05-22 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.243027440E09 +++$+++ I agree. Your hard work is improving the coverage of Indonesia.  +++$+++ :::I agree. Your hard work is improving the coverage of Indonesia. [[User:Davidelit|Davidelit]] ([[User talk:Davidelit|talk]]) 14:24, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

281823 +++$+++ Lonelydarksky +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281823 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-10 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.247243460E09 +++$+++ Hi, I was wondering if you've heard about Professor [[Yi Zhongtian]] (\u6613\u4e2d\u5929) from [[Xiamen University]]. He wrote a book called ''Yi Zhong Tian Pin San Guo'' (\u6613\u4e2d\u5929\u54c1\u4e09\u570b) on the Three Kingdoms. He's also conducted a series of lectures on [[Lecture Room]] as well. I've watched some of his lectures and read his book and found the information to be interesting and of great relevance. Can it be integrated into Three Kingdoms articles in some way? Here's a link to Baidu Baike for information about his book. [http:\/\/baike.baidu.com\/view\/150629.htm] Thanks  +++$+++ Hi, I was wondering if you've heard about Professor [[Yi Zhongtian]] (易中天) from [[Xiamen University]]. He wrote a book called ''Yi Zhong Tian Pin San Guo'' (易中天品三國) on the Three Kingdoms. He's also conducted a series of lectures on [[Lecture Room]] as well. I've watched some of his lectures and read his book and found the information to be interesting and of great relevance. Can it be integrated into Three Kingdoms articles in some way? Here's a link to Baidu Baike for information about his book. [http://baike.baidu.com/view/150629.htm] Thanks [[User:Lonelydarksky|Lonelydarksky]] ([[User talk:Lonelydarksky|talk]]) 09:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
281824 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281823 +++$+++ 281823 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.247243700E09 +++$+++ I've watched some episodes a few years ago. His lectures are interesting, if a bit oriented toward the Romance crowd. If you find anything in the book that you think should be added in, by all means, provide the page numbers and integrate! Cheers.  +++$+++ :I've watched some episodes a few years ago. His lectures are interesting, if a bit oriented toward the Romance crowd. If you find anything in the book that you think should be added in, by all means, provide the page numbers and integrate! Cheers. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 09:35, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
281825 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281823 +++$+++ 281823 +++$+++ 2009-07-17 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.247839020E09 +++$+++ There was no record of how old he was when he died in history, the authoritative source of which is the ''[[Records of the Three Kingdoms]]''. Unless you can manage to show me a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] where it's been shown he died at 75, I'm afraid I'd have to revert the addition. Cheers.  +++$+++ :There was no record of how old he was when he died in history, the authoritative source of which is the ''[[Records of the Three Kingdoms]]''. Unless you can manage to show me a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] where it's been shown he died at 75, I'm afraid I'd have to revert the addition. Cheers. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

265424 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265424 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-03 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.157349060E09 +++$+++ Don't blank ''other'' users' talk pages.  +++$+++ Don't blank ''other'' users' talk pages. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 22:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
265425 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265424 +++$+++ 265424 +++$+++ 2006-09-03 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.157349840E09 +++$+++ Okay, if it's your granddaughter's page... I'll look into it. You understand that we can't simply take people's word for this, of course, but it should be fairly easy for me to take care of.  +++$+++ :Okay, if it's your granddaughter's page... I'll look into it. You understand that we can't simply take people's word for this, of course, but it should be fairly easy for me to take care of. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 23:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
265426 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265424 +++$+++ 265425 +++$+++ 2006-09-03 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.157350080E09 +++$+++ Okay, I've read through it, and I'm willing to accept that it's your granddaughter. Shall I delete it?  +++$+++ ::Okay, I've read through it, and I'm willing to accept that it's your granddaughter. Shall I delete it? [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 23:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

281826 +++$+++ Lonelydarksky +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281826 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-17 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.247846160E09 +++$+++ Hi, I was wondering if you could help me create an infobox for the [[Water Margin]] characters at [[Template:Water Margin character infobox]], similar to those for the [[Three Kingdoms]] characters. I've created a documentation subpage [[Template:Water Margin character infobox\/doc|here]] but I don't know exactly how to create the infobox and go through all the admin work required. So I'm hoping that you can help me out on this. By the way, are you interested in joining [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Water Margin|WikiProject Water Margin]]? You can help us out and we need more members. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, I was wondering if you could help me create an infobox for the [[Water Margin]] characters at [[Template:Water Margin character infobox]], similar to those for the [[Three Kingdoms]] characters. I've created a documentation subpage [[Template:Water Margin character infobox/doc|here]] but I don't know exactly how to create the infobox and go through all the admin work required. So I'm hoping that you can help me out on this. By the way, are you interested in joining [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Water Margin|WikiProject Water Margin]]? You can help us out and we need more members. Thanks. [[User:Lonelydarksky|Lonelydarksky]] ([[User talk:Lonelydarksky|talk]]) 08:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
281827 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281826 +++$+++ 281826 +++$+++ 2009-07-17 09:19:00 +++$+++ 1.247847540E09 +++$+++ Well, I was not the one who made the infobox so I am not really confident with making one, but I guess I can build upon the one we have. There's no admin work required to make an infobox, to my knowledge, and I'm not one either. And I've never read Water Margin.... +++$+++ :Well, I was not the one who made the infobox so I am not really confident with making one, but I guess I can build upon the one we have. There's no admin work required to make an infobox, to my knowledge, and I'm not one either. And I've never read Water Margin....[[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 09:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
281828 +++$+++ Lonelydarksky +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281826 +++$+++ 281827 +++$+++ 2009-07-17 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.247852760E09 +++$+++ I see. Thanks for your help.  +++$+++ ::I see. Thanks for your help. [[User:Lonelydarksky|Lonelydarksky]] ([[User talk:Lonelydarksky|talk]]) 10:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
281829 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281826 +++$+++ 281828 +++$+++ 2009-07-17 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.247854740E09 +++$+++ Well, check out the template now. You think this will be okay? One point is that the \"designation\" field has to be filled out so that there won't be a meaningless \"of\" hanging there.  +++$+++ :::Well, check out the template now. You think this will be okay? One point is that the "designation" field has to be filled out so that there won't be a meaningless "of" hanging there. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 11:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
281830 +++$+++ Lonelydarksky +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281826 +++$+++ 281829 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.247934900E09 +++$+++ Excellent! Thanks a lot for your help.  +++$+++ ::::Excellent! Thanks a lot for your help. [[User:Lonelydarksky|Lonelydarksky]] ([[User talk:Lonelydarksky|talk]]) 09:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

543973 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-12 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.179015540E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim. Sorry to bother you again, but I thought I'd give you a heads-up that the lead image in [[Metabolism]] ([[:Image:Metabolic pathways small.png]]) was [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=Image:Metabolic_pathways_small.png deleted] from Commons as a copyvio. Apparently, it was taken from KEGG[http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Polarlys#Image:Metabolic_pathways_small.png]. I've been slowly working on a vector version of the file over the past couple of months, but now I think finding a replacement might be in order. Best,  +++$+++ Hi Tim. Sorry to bother you again, but I thought I'd give you a heads-up that the lead image in [[Metabolism]] ([[:Image:Metabolic pathways small.png]]) was [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=Image:Metabolic_pathways_small.png deleted] from Commons as a copyvio. Apparently, it was taken from KEGG[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Polarlys#Image:Metabolic_pathways_small.png]. I've been slowly working on a vector version of the file over the past couple of months, but now I think finding a replacement might be in order. Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]Â·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 17:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
543974 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543973 +++$+++ 543973 +++$+++ 2007-05-13 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.179098400E09 +++$+++ Looks nice. I quite like ATP in the lead, actually.  +++$+++ :Looks nice. I quite like ATP in the lead, actually. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]Â·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 16:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

19687 +++$+++ Youngamerican +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19687 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-01 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.251869160E09 +++$+++ Check [[User:Monegasque|your user page]]. Congratulations (if you do not want it on our user page, feel free to cut 'n paste it onto this talk page).  +++$+++ Check [[User:Monegasque|your user page]]. Congratulations (if you do not want it on our user page, feel free to cut 'n paste it onto this talk page). [[User:Youngamerican| ''<font color="#CC5500">young</font>''<font color="#321414">american</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Youngamerican|wtf?]])</small> 22:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
19688 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19687 +++$+++ 19687 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.251869340E09 +++$+++ What can I say? It does look nice...  +++$+++ :What can I say? It does look nice... [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 22:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

543976 +++$+++ GetAgrippa +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-12 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.179038880E09 +++$+++ Amen brother. The more you read the more absolutely ignorant you feel. Personally, I like that because it is never boring and always humbling. I noted your research interest-excellent and it has application. I will be absent for a couple of weeks but I will try to add some comments on the peer review if it is warranted. Thanks for the notice.  +++$+++ Amen brother. The more you read the more absolutely ignorant you feel. Personally, I like that because it is never boring and always humbling. I noted your research interest-excellent and it has application. I will be absent for a couple of weeks but I will try to add some comments on the peer review if it is warranted. Thanks for the notice. [[User:GetAgrippa|GetAgrippa]] 23:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
543977 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543976 +++$+++ 543976 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.179141120E09 +++$+++ I agree.  This article has been greatly enhanced by your edits.  My personal knowledge of the science behind evolution is a woeful 30 years out of date.  Nice to see, however, that really not that much has changed!!!!  BTW, I had no problem with the Futuyma reference revert.  I was doing some housecleaning of the article (just by reviewing the references, I've learned more than anything).   +++$+++ :I agree.  This article has been greatly enhanced by your edits.  My personal knowledge of the science behind evolution is a woeful 30 years out of date.  Nice to see, however, that really not that much has changed!!!!  BTW, I had no problem with the Futuyma reference revert.  I was doing some housecleaning of the article (just by reviewing the references, I've learned more than anything).  [[User:Orangemarlin|Orangemarlin]] 04:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

19689 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-02 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.251913500E09 +++$+++ b) Tom Baugh is not, literally, \"from\" Jackson County but from Chicago. As the article states, he is currently residing in Jackson County, but it's not the same thing as being \"from\" Jackson County. I'll give you another example: I spent a part of my childhood in Lyon, France, but that certainly doesn't mean that I'm \"from\" Lyon. Those are two different things altogether.  +++$+++ b) Tom Baugh is not, literally, "from" Jackson County but from Chicago. As the article states, he is currently residing in Jackson County, but it's not the same thing as being "from" Jackson County. I'll give you another example: I spent a part of my childhood in Lyon, France, but that certainly doesn't mean that I'm "from" Lyon. Those are two different things altogether. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 10:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
19690 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19689 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.251914220E09 +++$+++ Another word about the lifetime template. Certainly you know that it's a relatively common practice used by many Wikipedia editors and that it's no invention of mine. Has there been any discussion about it? Personally, I'm a little surprised that using or not using the template would matter much either way. As I wrote, I'd like you to give me some practical arguments against using it. Where is the harm, specifically?  +++$+++ :::Another word about the lifetime template. Certainly you know that it's a relatively common practice used by many Wikipedia editors and that it's no invention of mine. Has there been any discussion about it? Personally, I'm a little surprised that using or not using the template would matter much either way. As I wrote, I'd like you to give me some practical arguments against using it. Where is the harm, specifically? [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 10:57, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

281834 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281834 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-09 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.249817160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your additions here! By the way, if you didn't know, I have been working on the main article [[Chinese classifier]] for a couple months, and am preparing to take it to FAC. You are welcome to offer comments or criticism if you're interested. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ Thanks for your additions here! By the way, if you didn't know, I have been working on the main article [[Chinese classifier]] for a couple months, and am preparing to take it to FAC. You are welcome to offer comments or criticism if you're interested. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 04:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
281835 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281834 +++$+++ 281834 +++$+++ 2009-08-09 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.249819020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the invitation! While I can add to the list of classifiers, I'm not too familiar with the linguistic side of them. I was even having trouble classifying my additions as classifiers or measure words! (I hope I didn't put any under the wrong category) So I'm not in a position to criticize since I have much to learn from your labour :)  +++$+++ :Thanks for the invitation! While I can add to the list of classifiers, I'm not too familiar with the linguistic side of them. I was even having trouble classifying my additions as classifiers or measure words! (I hope I didn't put any under the wrong category) So I'm not in a position to criticize since I have much to learn from your labour :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 04:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
281836 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281834 +++$+++ 281835 +++$+++ 2009-08-09 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.249849800E09 +++$+++ Haha, don't worry, I'm sure there are enough errors in the article that I still have something to learn from everyone ;). If you ever run across anything there that you think is incorrect or could be improved, feel free to edit it or leave me a suggestion. Best, <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ ::Haha, don't worry, I'm sure there are enough errors in the article that I still have something to learn from everyone ;). If you ever run across anything there that you think is incorrect or could be improved, feel free to edit it or leave me a suggestion. Best, <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 13:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
281837 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281834 +++$+++ 281835 +++$+++ 2009-08-09 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.249849920E09 +++$+++ And as for having trouble classifying your additions, there's no problem there&mdash;everyone has trouble with that, even the linguists who proposed this distinction can't always agree on where some words fall! While the extremes on either side are very clear, most words probably fall somewhere on a continuum, and are a bit classifier and a bit measure word at the same time. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ ::And as for having trouble classifying your additions, there's no problem there&mdash;everyone has trouble with that, even the linguists who proposed this distinction can't always agree on where some words fall! While the extremes on either side are very clear, most words probably fall somewhere on a continuum, and are a bit classifier and a bit measure word at the same time. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 13:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
281838 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281834 +++$+++ 281837 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 02:06:00 +++$+++ 1.249895160E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Chinese_classifier&diff=307042008&oldid=306983163 Good catch]...I'm always making typos like that... Oh, and I just thought of one thing that would definitely be useful if you're interested...checking the article for entries that are missing traditional characters. I'm trying to keep the character somewhat neutral between traditional and simplified...it's mostly in simplified (for example sentences, etc.), but when actually naming a classifier I'm trying to give both. For example, \"\u8fd9\u662f\u4e00\u4e2a\u53e5\u5b50\" would only have simplified, but \"the classifier \u4e2a (\u500b)\" should have both. Since my formal learning was only simplified characters and I never officially learned traditional, it's possible that I've missed some. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ :::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chinese_classifier&diff=307042008&oldid=306983163 Good catch]...I'm always making typos like that... Oh, and I just thought of one thing that would definitely be useful if you're interested...checking the article for entries that are missing traditional characters. I'm trying to keep the character somewhat neutral between traditional and simplified...it's mostly in simplified (for example sentences, etc.), but when actually naming a classifier I'm trying to give both. For example, "这是一个句子" would only have simplified, but "the classifier 个 (個)" should have both. Since my formal learning was only simplified characters and I never officially learned traditional, it's possible that I've missed some. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 02:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
281839 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281834 +++$+++ 281838 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.249897380E09 +++$+++ That's a task I can gladly take on. Expect me to be done in a few minutes :) I'm surprised that there isn't a Chinese list of classifiers that's readily available online, since I am sure that there must be so many more classifiers than we have right now on the list...! (mostly poetic and ancient usages, though)  +++$+++ ::::That's a task I can gladly take on. Expect me to be done in a few minutes :) I'm surprised that there isn't a Chinese list of classifiers that's readily available online, since I am sure that there must be so many more classifiers than we have right now on the list...! (mostly poetic and ancient usages, though) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 02:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
281840 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281834 +++$+++ 281839 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.249899480E09 +++$+++ By the way, I am also making some small edits to the article right now, so we might end up edit conflicting :S . I'll try not to get in your way, though. <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ :::::By the way, I am also making some small edits to the article right now, so we might end up edit conflicting :S . I'll try not to get in your way, though. <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 03:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
281841 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281834 +++$+++ 281839 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.249899600E09 +++$+++ Oops, it looks like you already finished before I even noticed this! That was fast! Thanks a ton, <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ :::::Oops, it looks like you already finished before I even noticed this! That was fast! Thanks a ton, <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 03:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
281842 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281834 +++$+++ 281841 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.249903860E09 +++$+++ Wow, [http:\/\/chinesenotes.com\/ref_measure_words.htm this link] from the external links section has much more than the list we have! And to think I didn't look there first. I feel a little defeated.  +++$+++ ::::::Wow, [http://chinesenotes.com/ref_measure_words.htm this link] from the external links section has much more than the list we have! And to think I didn't look there first. I feel a little defeated. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 04:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

19691 +++$+++ Youngamerican +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19691 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-02 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.251915300E09 +++$+++ I disagree with your interpretation of \"people from\" usage. It has always included not only places of origin, but also places where folks have spent a significant portion of their life or have permanently settled.  +++$+++ I disagree with your interpretation of "people from" usage. It has always included not only places of origin, but also places where folks have spent a significant portion of their life or have permanently settled. [[User:Youngamerican| ''<font color="#CC5500">young</font>''<font color="#321414">american</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Youngamerican|wtf?]])</small> 11:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
19692 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19691 +++$+++ 19691 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.251916140E09 +++$+++ \"From\" denotes origin. When we say that someone is from, say, Glasgow, it normally means that the person we are speaking about is a Glasgow native. There should probably be a different category named, for example, \"Residents of X\". But never mind that. What I find more interesting is why using or not using the lifetime template for stating the birth and death years of a person should matter so much. What kind of practical problems could possibly arise from using it? As I wrote, it does save time.  +++$+++ :"From" denotes origin. When we say that someone is from, say, Glasgow, it normally means that the person we are speaking about is a Glasgow native. There should probably be a different category named, for example, "Residents of X". But never mind that. What I find more interesting is why using or not using the lifetime template for stating the birth and death years of a person should matter so much. What kind of practical problems could possibly arise from using it? As I wrote, it does save time. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 11:29, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
19693 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19691 +++$+++ 19691 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.251919380E09 +++$+++ I see.  +++$+++ :I see. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 12:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

543980 +++$+++ Dr d12 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-14 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.179180720E09 +++$+++ I recently updated the definition of [[phenotype]] (first paragraph) and see that you have done the same to [[trait (biology)]]. Before we edited, these articles basically said that an example of a trait would be \"eye color\" while an example of a phenotype would be \"blue eyes\". Are trait and phenotype synonyms?  +++$+++ I recently updated the definition of [[phenotype]] (first paragraph) and see that you have done the same to [[trait (biology)]]. Before we edited, these articles basically said that an example of a trait would be "eye color" while an example of a phenotype would be "blue eyes". Are trait and phenotype synonyms? [[User:Dr d12|Dr d12]] 15:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
543981 +++$+++ Dr d12 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543980 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.179198840E09 +++$+++ So by one definition, a phenotype and trait refer to the same measurable character, while phenotype can also refer to a collection of traits. (I added some definitions to the trait talk page as well.) I think all I have to do is add the second \"collection of traits\" use to the phenotype page.  +++$+++ ::So by one definition, a phenotype and trait refer to the same measurable character, while phenotype can also refer to a collection of traits. (I added some definitions to the trait talk page as well.) I think all I have to do is add the second "collection of traits" use to the phenotype page. [[User:Dr d12|Dr d12]] 20:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

19694 +++$+++ Youngamerican +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19694 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-02 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.251916320E09 +++$+++ Would you mind helping in restoring some these categories? It'll be a lot of work, but it'll boost your edit count. :)  +++$+++ Would you mind helping in restoring some these categories? It'll be a lot of work, but it'll boost your edit count. :) [[User:Youngamerican| ''<font color="#CC5500">young</font>''<font color="#321414">american</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Youngamerican|wtf?]])</small> 11:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
19695 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19694 +++$+++ 19694 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.251917520E09 +++$+++ As I wrote, the problem is that it conflicts with the way we normally use language (\"from\" denotes origin) and I still think there should be a specific category for \"Residents of X\". In any case, I'll give the matter some thought, even though I'm quite happy with my edit count so far...:) But really I find the lifetime template issue much more intriguing. I realize that I'm repeating myself, but you still haven't answered my question: What kind of practical problems could possibly arise from using the lifetime template as a shorter and more convenient way to state a person's birth and death years?  +++$+++ :As I wrote, the problem is that it conflicts with the way we normally use language ("from" denotes origin) and I still think there should be a specific category for "Residents of X". In any case, I'll give the matter some thought, even though I'm quite happy with my edit count so far...:) But really I find the lifetime template issue much more intriguing. I realize that I'm repeating myself, but you still haven't answered my question: What kind of practical problems could possibly arise from using the lifetime template as a shorter and more convenient way to state a person's birth and death years? [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 11:52, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
19696 +++$+++ Youngamerican +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19694 +++$+++ 19695 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.251917820E09 +++$+++ You'll have to talk to Rich about that one. I just brought up the \"people from\" issue. I suspect, though, that his reading of the \"lifetime\" guidelines is correct, as spelled out in the documentation that it should not be used to replace defaultsort. You might want to ask him on [[User_talk:Rich_Farmbrough|his talk page]], I'm sure he'd give you the answer that you seek.  +++$+++ ::You'll have to talk to Rich about that one. I just brought up the "people from" issue. I suspect, though, that his reading of the "lifetime" guidelines is correct, as spelled out in the documentation that it should not be used to replace defaultsort. You might want to ask him on [[User_talk:Rich_Farmbrough|his talk page]], I'm sure he'd give you the answer that you seek. [[User:Youngamerican| ''<font color="#CC5500">young</font>''<font color="#321414">american</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Youngamerican|wtf?]])</small> 11:57, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
19697 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19694 +++$+++ 19696 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.251918480E09 +++$+++ Sorry: I just re-read your comments and noticed that you hadn't actually written a single word about the lifetime template issue. As you sent me your comments about the same time as Rich Farmbrough, I got your comments mixed up with his. I'll just blame it on the fact that I'm in a hurry. That's the kind of thing that happens when you read too fast, trying to accomplish as much as possible in a short time...:)  +++$+++ :::Sorry: I just re-read your comments and noticed that you hadn't actually written a single word about the lifetime template issue. As you sent me your comments about the same time as Rich Farmbrough, I got your comments mixed up with his. I'll just blame it on the fact that I'm in a hurry. That's the kind of thing that happens when you read too fast, trying to accomplish as much as possible in a short time...:) [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 12:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

543983 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-14 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.179208440E09 +++$+++ Sure, no problem. I'll see what I can do by tomorrow.  +++$+++ Sure, no problem. I'll see what I can do by tomorrow. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]Â·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 22:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
543984 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543983 +++$+++ 543983 +++$+++ 2007-05-15 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.179267420E09 +++$+++ How's [[:Image:Evolution of complexity.svg|this]]? :)  +++$+++ :How's [[:Image:Evolution of complexity.svg|this]]? :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]Â·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 15:17, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

19698 +++$+++ Salimi +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19698 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-11 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.252683000E09 +++$+++ just curious why you took out the category:people from wya-what's-it, Kansas.  +++$+++ just curious why you took out the category:people from wya-what's-it, Kansas. [[User:Salimi|Abie the Fish Peddler]] ([[User talk:Salimi|talk]]) 08:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
19699 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19698 +++$+++ 19698 +++$+++ 2009-09-11 08:55:00 +++$+++ 1.252684500E09 +++$+++ It's a case of redundant categories. If somebody is from, say, Olathe, Kansas, it's simply redundant to give him\/her the category \"People from Johnson County, Kansas\" as well, since \"People from Olathe, Kansas\" is a subcategory of \"People from Johnson County, Kansas\", which is a subcategory of \"People from the Kansas City metropolitan area\". It's the same thing with \"People from Kansas City, Kansas\", which is a subcategory of \"People from Wyandotte County, Kansas\" and so on. +++$+++ :It's a case of redundant categories. If somebody is from, say, Olathe, Kansas, it's simply redundant to give him/her the category "People from Johnson County, Kansas" as well, since "People from Olathe, Kansas" is a subcategory of "People from Johnson County, Kansas", which is a subcategory of "People from the Kansas City metropolitan area". It's the same thing with "People from Kansas City, Kansas", which is a subcategory of "People from Wyandotte County, Kansas" and so on.[[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 08:55, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

265427 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-03 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.157352360E09 +++$+++ And don't let your granddaughter edit Wikipedia from your computer again.  +++$+++ And don't let your granddaughter edit Wikipedia from your computer again. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 23:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
265428 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265427 +++$+++ 265427 +++$+++ 2006-09-04 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.157353680E09 +++$+++ I don't want to abandon my edit history becaue I did good work and felt pride in it. And I am a writer and an editor in my profession, as well as a practitioner. That is the only pleasurable part of this place. But I can't have people bringing up my past and my occupation and using it against me. From what you are saying it sounds hopeless.  I'll just stop. Take another name and not do anything serious, just fiddle around so my edit won't matter, won't be an issue of pride.  (I feel I was driven to \"misbehaving\" because I had no way to protect myself and I couldn't take it forever - but if I have no investment I won't care - so new name, and just playing around sounds like the way to go.)  +++$+++ :I don't want to abandon my edit history becaue I did good work and felt pride in it. And I am a writer and an editor in my profession, as well as a practitioner. That is the only pleasurable part of this place. But I can't have people bringing up my past and my occupation and using it against me. From what you are saying it sounds hopeless.  I'll just stop. Take another name and not do anything serious, just fiddle around so my edit won't matter, won't be an issue of pride.  (I feel I was driven to "misbehaving" because I had no way to protect myself and I couldn't take it forever - but if I have no investment I won't care - so new name, and just playing around sounds like the way to go.) [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 00:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

19701 +++$+++ Eleassar +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-14 08:50:00 +++$+++ 1.252943400E09 +++$+++ Muljava is not part of Ivan\u010dna Gorica, as you have written (although it is part of the Ivan\u010dna Gorica municipality).[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Josip_Jur%C4%8Di%C4%8D&curid=19524656&diff=313642409&oldid=306172725] -- +++$+++ Muljava is not part of Ivančna Gorica, as you have written (although it is part of the Ivančna Gorica municipality).[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Josip_Jur%C4%8Di%C4%8D&curid=19524656&diff=313642409&oldid=306172725] --[[User:Eleassar|Eleassar]] <sup>[[User talk:Eleassar|my talk]]</sup> 08:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
19702 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19701 +++$+++ 19701 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.252947840E09 +++$+++ The category \"People from Ivan\u010dna Gorica\" is a subcategory of \"People by municipality in Slovenia\". This means that in this context the relevant point is the municipality, not the town itself. +++$+++ :The category "People from Ivančna Gorica" is a subcategory of "People by municipality in Slovenia". This means that in this context the relevant point is the municipality, not the town itself.[[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 10:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
19703 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19701 +++$+++ 19702 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.252948140E09 +++$+++ I checked the article and noticed that you were right: I had actually forgotten to add \"municipality\". I normally try to avoid such errors. I thought at first that you were questioning the category itself, but now I understand your comment much better.  +++$+++ ::I checked the article and noticed that you were right: I had actually forgotten to add "municipality". I normally try to avoid such errors. I thought at first that you were questioning the category itself, but now I understand your comment much better. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 10:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

543991 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543991 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-15 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.179295200E09 +++$+++ Thank you,  +++$+++ Thank you, [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 23:00, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
543992 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543991 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-16 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.179380820E09 +++$+++ The article reads very well, and I'm sorry that you're having so much grief with it.  What do you think of the following idea?  I like your illustration of light vs. dark circles, but you could also imagine making it with a ''discontinuous'' phenotype such as red vs. blue, perhaps corresponding to Mendel's wrinkled and smooth peas? Then, assuming that blue had a slight evolutionary advantage in terms of net reproduction, one could make a graph showing the red fraction declining and the blue fraction predominating exponentially over time.  If you like the idea, I could make the graphics tomorrow and send them to you.  Sending supportive thoughts your way,  +++$+++ ::The article reads very well, and I'm sorry that you're having so much grief with it.  What do you think of the following idea?  I like your illustration of light vs. dark circles, but you could also imagine making it with a ''discontinuous'' phenotype such as red vs. blue, perhaps corresponding to Mendel's wrinkled and smooth peas? Then, assuming that blue had a slight evolutionary advantage in terms of net reproduction, one could make a graph showing the red fraction declining and the blue fraction predominating exponentially over time.  If you like the idea, I could make the graphics tomorrow and send them to you.  Sending supportive thoughts your way, [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 22:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
543993 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543991 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.179514560E09 +++$+++ What do you think of [[User:Madprime|Madeleine's]] [[:Image:Simplified tree.png|tree image]]?  I like her colors and her combination of pie chart and phylogenetic tree, although there seems to be an internal uncertainty about the best taxonomic order, phyla or species.  Since our not-so-taciturn friend seems to like it as well, perhaps we could work to improve that tree?  It might help him save face, and win him over as an ally.  [[User:Madprime|Madeleine]] seems really nice and smart, at least that's my impression.  It's a pity about the Talk page, but the prolix debate can always be buried afterwards in an archive; look at the six archives over the photon's mass \xe2\x80\x94 going on seven. ;)  +++$+++ :::What do you think of [[User:Madprime|Madeleine's]] [[:Image:Simplified tree.png|tree image]]?  I like her colors and her combination of pie chart and phylogenetic tree, although there seems to be an internal uncertainty about the best taxonomic order, phyla or species.  Since our not-so-taciturn friend seems to like it as well, perhaps we could work to improve that tree?  It might help him save face, and win him over as an ally.  [[User:Madprime|Madeleine]] seems really nice and smart, at least that's my impression.  It's a pity about the Talk page, but the prolix debate can always be buried afterwards in an archive; look at the six archives over the photon's mass â going on seven. ;) [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 11:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
543994 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 543991 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.179550440E09 +++$+++ People who mean well sometimes have to work harder, but the rewards are that much richer and sweeter, no?  Congratulations on a well-earned tranquillity and warm admiration of friends.  If you have a moment sometime, send me your favorite poem, if you like one in particular.   Well done and good luck ahead,  +++$+++ ::::People who mean well sometimes have to work harder, but the rewards are that much richer and sweeter, no?  Congratulations on a well-earned tranquillity and warm admiration of friends.  If you have a moment sometime, send me your favorite poem, if you like one in particular.   Well done and good luck ahead, [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 21:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

19704 +++$+++ Soenke Rahn +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-01 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.254428460E09 +++$+++ with friendly greetings-- +++$+++ with friendly greetings--[[User:Soenke Rahn|Soenke Rahn]] ([[User talk:Soenke Rahn|talk]]) 13:21, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
19705 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19704 +++$+++ 19704 +++$+++ 2009-10-01 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.254447180E09 +++$+++ For instance: [http:\/\/www.servetus.org\/en\/news-events\/articulos\/20050428.htm] or [http:\/\/www.proel.org\/index.php?pagina=traductores\/reina] . The Spanish and the Portuguese wikipedias give Montemol\xedn as his birthplace as well. Note that Montemol\xedn belonged to the Kingdom of Seville at the time of his birth. This is why he had a good reason to call himself \"Hispalensis\" in the territorial sense of that word.  +++$+++ :For instance: [http://www.servetus.org/en/news-events/articulos/20050428.htm] or [http://www.proel.org/index.php?pagina=traductores/reina] . The Spanish and the Portuguese wikipedias give Montemolín as his birthplace as well. Note that Montemolín belonged to the Kingdom of Seville at the time of his birth. This is why he had a good reason to call himself "Hispalensis" in the territorial sense of that word. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 18:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
19706 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19704 +++$+++ 19705 +++$+++ 2009-10-01 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.254450480E09 +++$+++ Many Spanish provinces have the same name as their capitals. Mix-ups between province and city are very common. If a source states that somebody was born in, say, Zaragoza, one should try to find out whether the city or the province is meant.  +++$+++ ::Many Spanish provinces have the same name as their capitals. Mix-ups between province and city are very common. If a source states that somebody was born in, say, Zaragoza, one should try to find out whether the city or the province is meant. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 19:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

281850 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-24 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.261710900E09 +++$+++ Hey Deadkid. Long time no see. :) I was just wondering if you could type out and translate the Chinese above the logo of ''Laden VS USA''. Thank you and I would greatly appreciate it. :) \u2013  +++$+++ Hey Deadkid. Long time no see. :) I was just wondering if you could type out and translate the Chinese above the logo of ''Laden VS USA''. Thank you and I would greatly appreciate it. :) – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 19:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
281851 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 2009-12-24 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.261715220E09 +++$+++ Oh oops. Forgot to link to the image. Here you go: [[:File:Laden VS USA.jpg]]. \u2013  +++$+++ :Oh oops. Forgot to link to the image. Here you go: [[:File:Laden VS USA.jpg]]. – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 20:27, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
281852 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281851 +++$+++ 2009-12-25 02:05:00 +++$+++ 1.261735500E09 +++$+++ \u672c\uff0e\u62c9\u767b\u4e16\u7d00\u5927\u6311\u6230, Bin Laden's Challenge of the Century. So stupendously tasteless, it's brilliant!  +++$+++ ::本．拉登世紀大挑戰, Bin Laden's Challenge of the Century. So stupendously tasteless, it's brilliant! [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 02:05, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
281853 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281852 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.261884180E09 +++$+++ LOL Yeah, it's a very controversial game. XD \u2013  +++$+++ :::LOL Yeah, it's a very controversial game. XD – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 19:23, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
281854 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281852 +++$+++ 2009-12-26 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.261884600E09 +++$+++ Can you also transliterate it? :) Thanks. \u2013  +++$+++ :::Can you also transliterate it? :) Thanks. – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 19:30, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
281855 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281854 +++$+++ 2009-12-27 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.261916760E09 +++$+++ B\u011bn L\u0101d\u0113ng sh\xecj\xec d\xe0ti\u01ceozh\xe0n  +++$+++ ::::Běn Lādēng shìjì dàtiǎozhàn [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 04:26, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
281856 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281855 +++$+++ 2009-12-27 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.261925880E09 +++$+++ Thanks a ton man. So how have you been? Any new reads? \u2013  +++$+++ :::::Thanks a ton man. So how have you been? Any new reads? – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 06:58, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
281857 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281856 +++$+++ 2009-12-27 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.261931100E09 +++$+++ No, man. I've been busy and my hard drive crashed a while ago so I haven't had the time and mood to read things other than textbooks. Sigh.  +++$+++ ::::::No, man. I've been busy and my hard drive crashed a while ago so I haven't had the time and mood to read things other than textbooks. Sigh. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 08:25, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
281858 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281857 +++$+++ 2009-12-27 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.261961820E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry. That sucks. \u2013  +++$+++ :::::::I'm sorry. That sucks. – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 16:57, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
281859 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281858 +++$+++ 2009-12-28 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.261989480E09 +++$+++ Don't be. How've you been? +++$+++ ::::::::Don't be. How've you been?[[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 00:38, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
281860 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281859 +++$+++ 2009-12-28 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.262061060E09 +++$+++ I'm good. Just listening to some music by [[A Guy Called Gerald]]. Yes, he has a weird name. :P \u2013  +++$+++ :::::::::I'm good. Just listening to some music by [[A Guy Called Gerald]]. Yes, he has a weird name. :P – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 20:31, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
281861 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281860 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.262080500E09 +++$+++ Wow, you're listening to a guy called A Guy Called Gerald! In other news, when I get my computer fixed, the first thing I'm going to do is to run through [[Umineko no Naku Koro ni Chiru]]. Grrr.  +++$+++ ::::::::::Wow, you're listening to a guy called A Guy Called Gerald! In other news, when I get my computer fixed, the first thing I'm going to do is to run through [[Umineko no Naku Koro ni Chiru]]. Grrr. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 01:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
281862 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281861 +++$+++ 2009-12-30 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.262185620E09 +++$+++ Yeah isn't that annoying how all the lame little anime fans will go through and totally butcher all the hard work. Grrr. Then they will add all their fan cruft and argue over a bunch of crap that isn't important. :P Well anyway, good you're getting your computer fixed and sorry for the delay in my response. :( \u2013  +++$+++ :::::::::::Yeah isn't that annoying how all the lame little anime fans will go through and totally butcher all the hard work. Grrr. Then they will add all their fan cruft and argue over a bunch of crap that isn't important. :P Well anyway, good you're getting your computer fixed and sorry for the delay in my response. :( – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 07:07, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
281863 +++$+++ Jump Guru +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281861 +++$+++ 2010-01-05 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.262744940E09 +++$+++ Hello? \u2013  +++$+++ :::::::::::Hello? – [[User:Jump Guru|<span style="color:#BCBCBC; font: 90% trebuchet ms;">'''<span style="color: blue;">J U M P</span> <span style="color: magenta;">G U R U</span>'''</span>]] <sup><small>■[[User talk:Jump Guru|ask</small>㋐㋜㋗]]<small>■</small></sup> 18:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
281864 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281850 +++$+++ 281863 +++$+++ 2010-01-06 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.262769240E09 +++$+++ Hello there. I just got my computer fixed and now it's running on Windows 7! Yay. But school started. Nay.  +++$+++ ::::::::::::Hello there. I just got my computer fixed and now it's running on Windows 7! Yay. But school started. Nay. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 01:14, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

19708 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-03 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.254587400E09 +++$+++ Aqu\xed est\xe1: [http:\/\/es.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Manuel_Goded].  +++$+++ Aquí está: [http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Goded]. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 09:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
19709 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19708 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-03 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.254588180E09 +++$+++ Here's a typical example: [http:\/\/www.biografiasyvidas.com\/biografia\/g\/goded.htm]. His maternal surname is mentioned only once, in the beginning. After that he is is only referred to as \"Goded\".  +++$+++ ::Here's a typical example: [http://www.biografiasyvidas.com/biografia/g/goded.htm]. His maternal surname is mentioned only once, in the beginning. After that he is is only referred to as "Goded". [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 09:43, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
19710 +++$+++ Marine 69-71 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19708 +++$+++ 19708 +++$+++ 2009-10-03 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.254619200E09 +++$+++ An interesting and valid observation. Therefore, I'll go along and I will revert myself. Feel free to converse with me in my talk page since it is easier for me to keep track of on going discussions.  +++$+++ *An interesting and valid observation. Therefore, I'll go along and I will revert myself. Feel free to converse with me in my talk page since it is easier for me to keep track of on going discussions. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71|talk]]) 18:20, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

611689 +++$+++ SUIT +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611689 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-22 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164252840E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For helping me out when I needed some help. thanks, <font face=\"comic sans ms\"> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For helping me out when I needed some help. thanks, <font face="comic sans ms">[[User:SUIT|<font color="gold">'''SU'''</font><font color="silver">'''IT'''</font>]]</font> 19:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
611690 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611689 +++$+++ 611689 +++$+++ 2006-11-22 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.164252960E09 +++$+++ It wasn't much, honestly, but thank you for the award. It means a lot. \/\/  +++$+++ :It wasn't much, honestly, but thank you for the award. It means a lot. // [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuke'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sasuke-kun27|<font color="purple">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 19:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
611691 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611689 +++$+++ 611689 +++$+++ 2006-11-22 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.164256920E09 +++$+++ Actually, he is stronger than SSj2. Otherwise, it wouldn't have taken several Super Saiyans to defeat him. Also, adding ''\"(stop changing it, what was there before is inaccurate)\"'' doesn't really help keep your additions in the article. Please read the messages that have been left on your talk page. You did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as [[WP:OR|original research]], which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? If you can't prove that a SSj2 is stronger than LSSj Broly, it will be considered original research and it will be removed. Thank you for your time. \/\/  +++$+++ :Actually, he is stronger than SSj2. Otherwise, it wouldn't have taken several Super Saiyans to defeat him. Also, adding ''"(stop changing it, what was there before is inaccurate)"'' doesn't really help keep your additions in the article. Please read the messages that have been left on your talk page. You did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as [[WP:OR|original research]], which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? If you can't prove that a SSj2 is stronger than LSSj Broly, it will be considered original research and it will be removed. Thank you for your time. // [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuke'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sasuke-kun27|<font color="purple">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 20:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

544001 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-23 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.179964500E09 +++$+++ 2. Of more concern:  during the FAC, between the two of us, we brought the exact number of possible school-age children with TS mentioned in one source (530,000) forward to the article lead.  As I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Colin#Check_it_out commented to Colin last week,] that exact number has gone from relative obscurity to suddenly showing up regularly in my inbox via Google alerts and such; I noticed this as an indication that many journalists and others are doing their research via Wikipedia, since that number isn't widely published anywhere else (to my knowledge).  It occurs to me now that this number is likely to draw attention vis-a-vis the age-old problem of conflict of interest at, and competition for research funding from, the NIH.  Many disorders \"compete\" for NIH research funding (specifically in terms of \"disruptive behaviors\" which the NIH has targeted in some inititative whose name I can't recall), so other \"disorders\" would want \"competing\" prevalance rates to be as low as possible; that number is likely to attract attention.  (For TS, there's the additional factor that the NIH has a [[PANDAS|pony in the race,]] but that's another story.)  The 530,000 is based on a 10 per 1,000 estimate; there are several papers which back up this number, explaining why it's likely to be a good one, considering the amount of TS that does undetected, and my \"personal\" sense is that it's probably a good number that will be borne out over time.  The NIH says 200,000 adults may have \"severe\" TS (which is very rare), which substantiates the higher number among school-age children, when mild TS is more likely.  But, this number seems to be attracting attention, as it is perceived as high, and is the upper bound of cited prevalence ranges, and people outside of the TS research community just don't seem to have a sense of how common undetected TS is.  I can spend a lot of time citing the numerous sources that discuss it, and delving into controversy over the numbers, but a) I'd like to find a way to avoid that (I just don't have time over the next two weeks to dig into all my papers, and I'm going to be traveling), and b) I also want to avoid having ridiculously low and outdated numbers like the Apter study take on undue weight in the article &mdash; anyone who follows TS research knows of the methodological issues in that older data.  Somewhere (which will take me time to find, since I have four large file drawers full of papers) Scahill suggested that 4-5 per thousand should be used. Papers regularly suggest the number should be bracketed at 1 to 10. When I put in the 530,000 number, it seemed that it would be reasonable to just \"do the math\" and say that would translate to about half of that at typical prevalence ranges in the middle, but it seems to me that doing that (the math) would be original research.  So, issues are being raised on the talk page, with the result that outdated, very low numbers (like Apter) are being included; an additional set of eyes might help resolve the dilemma.  Thanks in advance for any ideas you might have.   +++$+++ 2. Of more concern:  during the FAC, between the two of us, we brought the exact number of possible school-age children with TS mentioned in one source (530,000) forward to the article lead.  As I [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Colin#Check_it_out commented to Colin last week,] that exact number has gone from relative obscurity to suddenly showing up regularly in my inbox via Google alerts and such; I noticed this as an indication that many journalists and others are doing their research via Wikipedia, since that number isn't widely published anywhere else (to my knowledge).  It occurs to me now that this number is likely to draw attention vis-a-vis the age-old problem of conflict of interest at, and competition for research funding from, the NIH.  Many disorders "compete" for NIH research funding (specifically in terms of "disruptive behaviors" which the NIH has targeted in some inititative whose name I can't recall), so other "disorders" would want "competing" prevalance rates to be as low as possible; that number is likely to attract attention.  (For TS, there's the additional factor that the NIH has a [[PANDAS|pony in the race,]] but that's another story.)  The 530,000 is based on a 10 per 1,000 estimate; there are several papers which back up this number, explaining why it's likely to be a good one, considering the amount of TS that does undetected, and my "personal" sense is that it's probably a good number that will be borne out over time.  The NIH says 200,000 adults may have "severe" TS (which is very rare), which substantiates the higher number among school-age children, when mild TS is more likely.  But, this number seems to be attracting attention, as it is perceived as high, and is the upper bound of cited prevalence ranges, and people outside of the TS research community just don't seem to have a sense of how common undetected TS is.  I can spend a lot of time citing the numerous sources that discuss it, and delving into controversy over the numbers, but a) I'd like to find a way to avoid that (I just don't have time over the next two weeks to dig into all my papers, and I'm going to be traveling), and b) I also want to avoid having ridiculously low and outdated numbers like the Apter study take on undue weight in the article &mdash; anyone who follows TS research knows of the methodological issues in that older data.  Somewhere (which will take me time to find, since I have four large file drawers full of papers) Scahill suggested that 4-5 per thousand should be used. Papers regularly suggest the number should be bracketed at 1 to 10. When I put in the 530,000 number, it seemed that it would be reasonable to just "do the math" and say that would translate to about half of that at typical prevalence ranges in the middle, but it seems to me that doing that (the math) would be original research.  So, issues are being raised on the talk page, with the result that outdated, very low numbers (like Apter) are being included; an additional set of eyes might help resolve the dilemma.  Thanks in advance for any ideas you might have.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
544002 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544001 +++$+++ 544001 +++$+++ 2007-05-23 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.179974880E09 +++$+++ My only suggestion at this stage is to request a pause in the discussion at [[Talk:Tourette syndrome]] until Sandy gets back.  If that doesn't work, perhaps Tim can find a compromise that will do for now? Don't overestimate my knowledge of \"TS research\". I've read a textbook, the WP articles and a few papers! My understanding of prevalence\/incidence is only what I've learned in order to contribute to my own neglected [[tuberous sclerosis|pet subject (TSC)]]. I'm fortunate TSC is genetic with a stable diagnosis that isn't subject to the whim of the DSM (a recent New Scientist [http:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/channel\/health\/mg19426043.900-bipolar-children--is-the-us-overdiagnosing.html article] and [http:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/channel\/opinion\/mg19426042.900-editorial-mania-for-treatment.html editorial] on bipolar diagnosis in children caught my attention). I appreciate the politics and possible agenda issues. For now, it looks like a fairly healthy fact-based discussion. I'll keep an eye on it  +++$+++ :My only suggestion at this stage is to request a pause in the discussion at [[Talk:Tourette syndrome]] until Sandy gets back.  If that doesn't work, perhaps Tim can find a compromise that will do for now? Don't overestimate my knowledge of "TS research". I've read a textbook, the WP articles and a few papers! My understanding of prevalence/incidence is only what I've learned in order to contribute to my own neglected [[tuberous sclerosis|pet subject (TSC)]]. I'm fortunate TSC is genetic with a stable diagnosis that isn't subject to the whim of the DSM (a recent New Scientist [http://www.newscientist.com/channel/health/mg19426043.900-bipolar-children--is-the-us-overdiagnosing.html article] and [http://www.newscientist.com/channel/opinion/mg19426042.900-editorial-mania-for-treatment.html editorial] on bipolar diagnosis in children caught my attention). I appreciate the politics and possible agenda issues. For now, it looks like a fairly healthy fact-based discussion. I'll keep an eye on it [[User:Colin|Colin]]Â°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
544003 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544001 +++$+++ 544002 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.180044660E09 +++$+++ Extra eyes are always helpful, Colin, as you're both often able to cut through the fluff and come up with a solution from a fresh point of view.  I was up all night re-organizing my files (like I didn't have a million other things to do, but I suppose I needed to do that anyway) so I can source common knowledge facts, and I have pending travel, so the timing on this is irritating ... oh, well ... that seems to be the story for the TS article.  I sure would have preferred to use this time to work on the FARs for [[Lesch-Nyhan syndrome]] and [[Schizophrenia]], and to begin reading Kushner, since I had planned to start that writing this summer.  Oh, well.  I guess I get to go back and cite common knowledge instead.  I can't say it's not discouraging, or that I can understand this concern that someone somewhere might have to fund something because we report the numbers.  On the other hand, by digging through all of my research material, I did find that the bracket of numbers is referenced, so my question about \"doing the math\" being original research is now resolved.  I don't know what the Hirtz report is about, but I'm going to have to put my hands on it now in all my spare time.   +++$+++ ::Extra eyes are always helpful, Colin, as you're both often able to cut through the fluff and come up with a solution from a fresh point of view.  I was up all night re-organizing my files (like I didn't have a million other things to do, but I suppose I needed to do that anyway) so I can source common knowledge facts, and I have pending travel, so the timing on this is irritating ... oh, well ... that seems to be the story for the TS article.  I sure would have preferred to use this time to work on the FARs for [[Lesch-Nyhan syndrome]] and [[Schizophrenia]], and to begin reading Kushner, since I had planned to start that writing this summer.  Oh, well.  I guess I get to go back and cite common knowledge instead.  I can't say it's not discouraging, or that I can understand this concern that someone somewhere might have to fund something because we report the numbers.  On the other hand, by digging through all of my research material, I did find that the bracket of numbers is referenced, so my question about "doing the math" being original research is now resolved.  I don't know what the Hirtz report is about, but I'm going to have to put my hands on it now in all my spare time.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

19714 +++$+++ NothingButAGoodNothing +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-14 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.255579620E09 +++$+++ VASCO AMARAL - -- +++$+++ VASCO AMARAL - --[[User:NothingButAGoodNothing|NothingButAGoodNothing]] ([[User talk:NothingButAGoodNothing|talk]]) 21:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
19715 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19714 +++$+++ 19714 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.255587540E09 +++$+++ Sure, he's known by the general public as \"Paulino\", but on the other hand  the article's name is \"Paulino Mart\xednez Soria\", not \"Paulino\". This is why it's kind of irregular to sort him beginning with his first name. Many singers, for instance, are best known by their first name (or their stage name), and in many cases the article about them has only the first name in the title, in which case the only alternative is to sort them by their first name. Articles about footballers, on the other hand, have the full name in the title. A tricky question...  +++$+++ :Sure, he's known by the general public as "Paulino", but on the other hand  the article's name is "Paulino Martínez Soria", not "Paulino". This is why it's kind of irregular to sort him beginning with his first name. Many singers, for instance, are best known by their first name (or their stage name), and in many cases the article about them has only the first name in the title, in which case the only alternative is to sort them by their first name. Articles about footballers, on the other hand, have the full name in the title. A tricky question... [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 23:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

265430 +++$+++ Nunquam Dormio +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-09 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.157852160E09 +++$+++ Allegations of sock puppetry have been made against some of the accounts that have edited the [[Center for Science in the Public Interest]] page. I have instigated the wiki process for handling such allegations. See [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/David Justin]]. As someone who has contributed to the CSPI page, please add your views to the Comments section. You have up to 10 days to make comments on the allegation.  +++$+++ Allegations of sock puppetry have been made against some of the accounts that have edited the [[Center for Science in the Public Interest]] page. I have instigated the wiki process for handling such allegations. See [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/David Justin]]. As someone who has contributed to the CSPI page, please add your views to the Comments section. You have up to 10 days to make comments on the allegation. [[User:Nunquam Dormio|Nunquam Dormio]] 18:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
265431 +++$+++ Nunquam Dormio +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265430 +++$+++ 265430 +++$+++ 2006-09-10 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.157921700E09 +++$+++ Hi there, Matisse. My original message to potentially interested parties was rather poorly worded. There was no allegation against them, just an invitation to comment. My apologies if the message fazed you slightly.  +++$+++ :Hi there, Matisse. My original message to potentially interested parties was rather poorly worded. There was no allegation against them, just an invitation to comment. My apologies if the message fazed you slightly. [[User:Nunquam Dormio|Nunquam Dormio]] 13:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

19718 +++$+++ Yopie +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-10 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.265859480E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits{{#if:Postage stamps and postal history of Northern Epirus|, such as your recent edits to [[:Postage stamps and postal history of Northern Epirus]],}} as \"minor\" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with [[Help:Minor edit]], a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the [[Help:Reverting|reversion]] of clear-cut [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and test edits may be labeled \"minor\". Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-minor -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits{{#if:Postage stamps and postal history of Northern Epirus|, such as your recent edits to [[:Postage stamps and postal history of Northern Epirus]],}} as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with [[Help:Minor edit]], a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the [[Help:Reverting|reversion]] of clear-cut [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-minor --> [[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie|talk]]) 19:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
19719 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19718 +++$+++ 19718 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.265865000E09 +++$+++ Actually, as I saw it, my edits ''were'' minor in the sense that I didn't believe they could be, as the definition goes, \"the subject of a dispute\". As a rule, using exonyms instead of the standard placenames (example: calling Trier \"Tr\xe8ves\" is quite all right if you're writing in French, but definitely not if you're writing in English) should be restricted to a minimum and this seemed to be a case where a previous editor had for some reason used exonyms even though the context didn't seem to warrant it. This is why I \"standardized\" the placenames according to the names that these places are called in the wikiarticles dedicated to them. I saw it as a question of clarity. +++$+++ :Actually, as I saw it, my edits ''were'' minor in the sense that I didn't believe they could be, as the definition goes, "the subject of a dispute". As a rule, using exonyms instead of the standard placenames (example: calling Trier "Trèves" is quite all right if you're writing in French, but definitely not if you're writing in English) should be restricted to a minimum and this seemed to be a case where a previous editor had for some reason used exonyms even though the context didn't seem to warrant it. This is why I "standardized" the placenames according to the names that these places are called in the wikiarticles dedicated to them. I saw it as a question of clarity.[[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 21:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
19720 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19718 +++$+++ 19719 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.265866500E09 +++$+++ A comparable case would be an article about the Czech Lands during World War II where an editor would use the German exonyms K\xf6niggr\xe4tz, Budweis and Iglau instead of the standard forms Hradec Kr\xe1lov\xe9, \u010cesk\xe9 Bud\u011bjovice and Jihlava normally used in English-language prose when these cities are referred to. In a German-language article I would, of course, ''expect'' to find the forms K\xf6niggr\xe4tz, Budweis and Iglau, but not in an English-language one. As editors very often speak some other language than English as their first language, many editors tend to half-automatically and more or less unreflectedly use the forms most familiar to them, even though they may not be the standard forms one is supposed to use when one in writing in English. Hence the tendency to use exonyms.  +++$+++ ::A comparable case would be an article about the Czech Lands during World War II where an editor would use the German exonyms Königgrätz, Budweis and Iglau instead of the standard forms Hradec Králové, České Budějovice and Jihlava normally used in English-language prose when these cities are referred to. In a German-language article I would, of course, ''expect'' to find the forms Königgrätz, Budweis and Iglau, but not in an English-language one. As editors very often speak some other language than English as their first language, many editors tend to half-automatically and more or less unreflectedly use the forms most familiar to them, even though they may not be the standard forms one is supposed to use when one in writing in English. Hence the tendency to use exonyms. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 21:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

281865 +++$+++ Lonelydarksky +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281865 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-21 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.264090860E09 +++$+++ Hi, I see you've contributed to some [[Chu\u2013Han contention]]-related articles before. Do you mind doing a peer review for [[Xiang Yu]] [[Wikipedia:Peer_review\/Xiang_Yu\/archive1|here]]? Thanks. _ +++$+++ Hi, I see you've contributed to some [[Chu–Han contention]]-related articles before. Do you mind doing a peer review for [[Xiang Yu]] [[Wikipedia:Peer_review/Xiang_Yu/archive1|here]]? Thanks. _[[User:Lonelydarksky|LDS]] ([[User_talk:Lonelydarksky|talk]]) 08:21, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
281866 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281865 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-25 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.264449120E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the late reply, I'm a bit tired and busy lately. My knowledge in that period isn't very throughout so I don't think I'm qualified to make judgments on accuracy. But I'm glad someone is taking care of that period, since many articles about that period are missing on Wiki.  +++$+++ ::Sorry for the late reply, I'm a bit tired and busy lately. My knowledge in that period isn't very throughout so I don't think I'm qualified to make judgments on accuracy. But I'm glad someone is taking care of that period, since many articles about that period are missing on Wiki. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 11:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
281867 +++$+++ Lonelydarksky +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281865 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-25 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.264457700E09 +++$+++ It's alright then. I think I can handle everything myself at the moment. Maybe you can help by reverting vandalism. Thanks for your reply. Cheers! :) _ +++$+++ :::It's alright then. I think I can handle everything myself at the moment. Maybe you can help by reverting vandalism. Thanks for your reply. Cheers! :) _[[User:Lonelydarksky|LDS]] ([[User_talk:Lonelydarksky|talk]]) 14:15, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

544010 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544010 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-28 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.180344540E09 +++$+++ Hi, Tim; since you speak oxidants and anti-oxidants, and I don't, you might be able to figure out what's up with Oxidative stress at [[Lesch-Nyhan syndrome]].  {{User|Pproctor}} is inserting research apparently authored by him, with links to his website, but I'm unable to see the connection between the text he's entering (about stroke) and LNS, or to determine if it's good research.  I just don't know the topic.  It doesn't look like LNS is going to make it through FAR, since nothing is happening, and it fails 1a, 1b, 1c and 2 right now.   +++$+++ Hi, Tim; since you speak oxidants and anti-oxidants, and I don't, you might be able to figure out what's up with Oxidative stress at [[Lesch-Nyhan syndrome]].  {{User|Pproctor}} is inserting research apparently authored by him, with links to his website, but I'm unable to see the connection between the text he's entering (about stroke) and LNS, or to determine if it's good research.  I just don't know the topic.  It doesn't look like LNS is going to make it through FAR, since nothing is happening, and it fails 1a, 1b, 1c and 2 right now.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
544011 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544010 +++$+++ 544010 +++$+++ 2007-05-28 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.180348380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for looking into it; it's completely Greek to me, but appeared to be worth checking out, and you're the one who would know.  Too bad we lost the only part of the article that was cited :\/  Best,  +++$+++ :Thanks for looking into it; it's completely Greek to me, but appeared to be worth checking out, and you're the one who would know.  Too bad we lost the only part of the article that was cited :/  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
544012 +++$+++ Pproctor +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544010 +++$+++ 544011 +++$+++ 2007-05-28 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.180384800E09 +++$+++ BTW,  while we are playing competing experts here,  I published my first paper on uric acid and the possible physiological role of its redox properties in the journal ''Nature'' in 1970 [http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v228\/n5274\/abs\/228868a0.html].  Check it out.  I got into the \"biz\" after encountering a patient with LNS about 1968.  This was one of the first identifed cases after the first description of this syndrome.   Has anyone else posting here actually seen a case of LNS or published any papers on it?  I am also an MD, PhD trained as a pathologist. +++$+++ ::BTW,  while we are playing competing experts here,  I published my first paper on uric acid and the possible physiological role of its redox properties in the journal ''Nature'' in 1970 [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v228/n5274/abs/228868a0.html].  Check it out.  I got into the "biz" after encountering a patient with LNS about 1968.  This was one of the first identifed cases after the first description of this syndrome.   Has anyone else posting here actually seen a case of LNS or published any papers on it?  I am also an MD, PhD trained as a pathologist.[[User:Pproctor|Pproctor]] 13:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

281868 +++$+++ Lonelydarksky +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281868 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-16 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.266344820E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for reverting the edits on the article. [[Special:Contributions\/62.237.141.27|That IP editor]] clearly doesn't understand the importance of [[WP:Citing sources|citing sources]] and that [[WP:OR|original research]] is not acceptable here. I've left him\/her a message on his\/her [[User talk:62.237.141.27#Thirty-Six Stratagems|talk page]]. Oh yes, and [[Chinese New Year]] greetings to you! _ +++$+++ Hi, thanks for reverting the edits on the article. [[Special:Contributions/62.237.141.27|That IP editor]] clearly doesn't understand the importance of [[WP:Citing sources|citing sources]] and that [[WP:OR|original research]] is not acceptable here. I've left him/her a message on his/her [[User talk:62.237.141.27#Thirty-Six Stratagems|talk page]]. Oh yes, and [[Chinese New Year]] greetings to you! _[[User:Lonelydarksky|LDS]] ([[User_talk:Lonelydarksky|talk]]) 10:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
281869 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281868 +++$+++ 281868 +++$+++ 2010-02-16 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.266348060E09 +++$+++ And a prosperous year of the tiger to you.  +++$+++ :And a prosperous year of the tiger to you. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 11:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
281870 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281868 +++$+++ 281868 +++$+++ 2010-03-02 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.267538940E09 +++$+++ It is clear that the statue is an imagined depiction, nobody said this is how he had looked like. The point of the image was to provide a view on his legacy (legitimate or not), since we have no clear knowledge of what historical figures looked like. If even an imagined likeness can be contentious, then I'm afraid the pictures of statues in [[Shang Yang]], [[Qin Shi Huang]], [[Sun Zi]] and the like would also be considered unencyclopedic, misleading, etc. Since you obviously are deeply invested in this issue, I invite and urge you to find a better picture that conforms to the license requirements of Wikipedia. Please continue this discussion on the article's talk page so others can have a chance to join in.  +++$+++ :It is clear that the statue is an imagined depiction, nobody said this is how he had looked like. The point of the image was to provide a view on his legacy (legitimate or not), since we have no clear knowledge of what historical figures looked like. If even an imagined likeness can be contentious, then I'm afraid the pictures of statues in [[Shang Yang]], [[Qin Shi Huang]], [[Sun Zi]] and the like would also be considered unencyclopedic, misleading, etc. Since you obviously are deeply invested in this issue, I invite and urge you to find a better picture that conforms to the license requirements of Wikipedia. Please continue this discussion on the article's talk page so others can have a chance to join in. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

19725 +++$+++ Norden1990 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19725 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-18 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.268937000E09 +++$+++ Please, stop the [[Slovakization]], [[Zlatna]] was called Zalatna before the [[Treaty of Trianon]], so for example [[L\xe1szl\xf3 Luk\xe1cs]] was born in Zalatna, not Zlatna. If anybody is born in [[Constantinapole]] (Middle Ages), then was he born in [[Istanbul]]?-- +++$+++ Please, stop the [[Slovakization]], [[Zlatna]] was called Zalatna before the [[Treaty of Trianon]], so for example [[László Lukács]] was born in Zalatna, not Zlatna. If anybody is born in [[Constantinapole]] (Middle Ages), then was he born in [[Istanbul]]?--[[User:Norden1990|Norden1990]] ([[User talk:Norden1990|talk]]) 11:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
19726 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19725 +++$+++ 19725 +++$+++ 2010-03-18 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.268939700E09 +++$+++ As far as I know, Zlatna\/Zalatna\/Kleinschlatten\/Schlatten\/Goldenmarkt\/Ampellum is in '''Transylvania''', not in '''Slovakia'''. I am well aware of the fact that practically all localities in Transylvania have at least two names (Romanian and Hungarian) and that many places there have a German name as well. Istanbul\/Constantinople doesn't quite compare with Transsylvania, where we have a case of three ethnicities sharing the same geographical space. If you write that Zlatna was called Zalatna before the treaty of Trianon, you should qualify that statement: Zlatna's '''official''' name between 1867 and 1920 (when it belonged to the Kingdom of Hungary) was Zalatna. In 1920, when Transylvania was transferred to Romania in the Treaty of Trianon, its '''official''' name changed to Zlatna. Before 1867, when the Kingdom of Hungary was simply a part of Austria and not its own state, it had '''officially''' a German name. As Luk\xe1cs was born in 1850, he was officially born in '''Austria''', not in Hungary, and according to your logic, we should state that he was born in Kleinschlatten (or Schlatten or Goldenmarkt), not in Zalatna, as Hungary didn't exist as a state at that point but was merely a part of Austria. All this doesn't change the fact that even today, that locality in referred to in Hungarian as Zalatna and in German mostly as Kleinschlatten (sometimes Schlatten or Goldenmarkt). This fact was the same before 1920 and before 1867. In all other languages than Hungarian and German, however, that locality is referred to by its official Romanian name, which is the only one you will find in most maps. So the point of using the Romanian form was not \"Slovakization\" as you suggest (and not even \"Romanization\"), but '''standardization'''. Consult a standard map of the area, and which is the name you will find? Zlatna. That said, I'm not in principle against including both forms of the name (or the German name, for that matter), although it does look a little cluttery. The point is that the name of the locality should preferably make sense to someone consulting a modern map.  +++$+++ :As far as I know, Zlatna/Zalatna/Kleinschlatten/Schlatten/Goldenmarkt/Ampellum is in '''Transylvania''', not in '''Slovakia'''. I am well aware of the fact that practically all localities in Transylvania have at least two names (Romanian and Hungarian) and that many places there have a German name as well. Istanbul/Constantinople doesn't quite compare with Transsylvania, where we have a case of three ethnicities sharing the same geographical space. If you write that Zlatna was called Zalatna before the treaty of Trianon, you should qualify that statement: Zlatna's '''official''' name between 1867 and 1920 (when it belonged to the Kingdom of Hungary) was Zalatna. In 1920, when Transylvania was transferred to Romania in the Treaty of Trianon, its '''official''' name changed to Zlatna. Before 1867, when the Kingdom of Hungary was simply a part of Austria and not its own state, it had '''officially''' a German name. As Lukács was born in 1850, he was officially born in '''Austria''', not in Hungary, and according to your logic, we should state that he was born in Kleinschlatten (or Schlatten or Goldenmarkt), not in Zalatna, as Hungary didn't exist as a state at that point but was merely a part of Austria. All this doesn't change the fact that even today, that locality in referred to in Hungarian as Zalatna and in German mostly as Kleinschlatten (sometimes Schlatten or Goldenmarkt). This fact was the same before 1920 and before 1867. In all other languages than Hungarian and German, however, that locality is referred to by its official Romanian name, which is the only one you will find in most maps. So the point of using the Romanian form was not "Slovakization" as you suggest (and not even "Romanization"), but '''standardization'''. Consult a standard map of the area, and which is the name you will find? Zlatna. That said, I'm not in principle against including both forms of the name (or the German name, for that matter), although it does look a little cluttery. The point is that the name of the locality should preferably make sense to someone consulting a modern map. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 12:15, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
19727 +++$+++ Norden1990 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19725 +++$+++ 19725 +++$+++ 2010-03-18 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.268945160E09 +++$+++ Officially Hungary is an independent state before 1867, there were personal union between Austria and Hungary. Of course ''de facto'' Austria occupied Hungary, but if you see a contemporary map, you can find Hungary. You have to know, there are lot of assimilative attacks against Hungary and the Hungarian minority. They (Romanians, Slovaks etc.) declared many Hungarian historical persons as Slovaks, Romanians ([[Kossuth]], [[Zs\xf3fia Bosny\xe1k]], [[M\xe1t\xe9 Cs\xe1k]]). So this an eternal fight between the countries, for example the Slovaks want to create a history for themselves. I am not [[chauvinist]] before you would believe it, but the fact is fact.-- +++$+++ *Officially Hungary is an independent state before 1867, there were personal union between Austria and Hungary. Of course ''de facto'' Austria occupied Hungary, but if you see a contemporary map, you can find Hungary. You have to know, there are lot of assimilative attacks against Hungary and the Hungarian minority. They (Romanians, Slovaks etc.) declared many Hungarian historical persons as Slovaks, Romanians ([[Kossuth]], [[Zsófia Bosnyák]], [[Máté Csák]]). So this an eternal fight between the countries, for example the Slovaks want to create a history for themselves. I am not [[chauvinist]] before you would believe it, but the fact is fact.--[[User:Norden1990|Norden1990]] ([[User talk:Norden1990|talk]]) 13:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

352813 +++$+++ Fbv65edel +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ 352813 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.176720120E09 +++$+++ Hey Deathphoenix, haven't seen you around lately. Your edits in March were fairly low, and your last edit was over two weeks ago. Taking an extended wikibreak? Hope you'll be back soon. --'''[[User:Fbv65edel|Fbv]]'''[[User:Fbv65edel|65]]''<font color=\"green\">[[User:Fbv65edel\/Esperanza|e]]<\/font> +++$+++ Hey Deathphoenix, haven't seen you around lately. Your edits in March were fairly low, and your last edit was over two weeks ago. Taking an extended wikibreak? Hope you'll be back soon. --'''[[User:Fbv65edel|Fbv]]'''[[User:Fbv65edel|65]]''<font color="green">[[User:Fbv65edel/Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User:Fbv65edel|del]]'' / [[User_talk:Fbv65edel|☑t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Fbv65edel|☛c]] || 03:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
352814 +++$+++ Fbv65edel +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ 352813 +++$+++ 352813 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.177020240E09 +++$+++ Well, that's understandable. I'm sure I'd have so much more time to just be me if I left the project, but it's just that high level of Wikiholicness. Glad you can stick around on and off though -- because without you, that'd be three respectable admins (with Hermione1980, who seems never to be returning, and EvilPhoenix) gone from [[WP:WPHP]]. Anyway, best of luck. --'''[[User:Fbv65edel|Fbv]]'''[[User:Fbv65edel|65]]''<font color=\"green\">[[User:Fbv65edel\/Esperanza|e]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Well, that's understandable. I'm sure I'd have so much more time to just be me if I left the project, but it's just that high level of Wikiholicness. Glad you can stick around on and off though -- because without you, that'd be three respectable admins (with Hermione1980, who seems never to be returning, and EvilPhoenix) gone from [[WP:WPHP]]. Anyway, best of luck. --'''[[User:Fbv65edel|Fbv]]'''[[User:Fbv65edel|65]]''<font color="green">[[User:Fbv65edel/Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User:Fbv65edel|del]]'' / [[User_talk:Fbv65edel|☑t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Fbv65edel|☛c]] || 15:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

19728 +++$+++ Michael Bednarek +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-24 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.269429780E09 +++$+++ Why {{Querylink|Paul Abraham|qs=&curid=3748570&diff=351638763&oldid=336356111|this}} null-edit at [[Paul Abraham]]? --  +++$+++ Why {{Querylink|Paul Abraham|qs=&curid=3748570&diff=351638763&oldid=336356111|this}} null-edit at [[Paul Abraham]]? -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 04:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
19729 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19728 +++$+++ 19728 +++$+++ 2010-03-24 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.269451200E09 +++$+++ Info about where a person was born and about his\/her ethnic\/religious background and the like is usually placed immediately after the info about when he\/she was born\/died. In a word: standardization.  +++$+++ :Info about where a person was born and about his/her ethnic/religious background and the like is usually placed immediately after the info about when he/she was born/died. In a word: standardization. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 10:20, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

265432 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265432 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-12 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.158101580E09 +++$+++ Hi Matisse, thank you for your recent edits to the [[Jagannath]] and related pages. A much needed serious tidy-up... :-) Great! Best Wishes, ys,  +++$+++ Hi Matisse, thank you for your recent edits to the [[Jagannath]] and related pages. A much needed serious tidy-up... :-) Great! Best Wishes, ys, [[User:GourangaUK|GourangaUK]] 15:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
265433 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265432 +++$+++ 265432 +++$+++ 2006-09-20 08:33:00 +++$+++ 1.158766380E09 +++$+++ Hello Matisse, I saw you've added an image to the article [[Jagannath Temple (Puri)]] and was wondering if this was a photograph from a part of the actual temple itself or another one nearby?. I have one photograph of the main temple building from the outside which I took myself, although it's a bit dark. Maybe a shot of the temple complex might look good if you have any? What do you think? Best Wishes,  +++$+++ :Hello Matisse, I saw you've added an image to the article [[Jagannath Temple (Puri)]] and was wondering if this was a photograph from a part of the actual temple itself or another one nearby?. I have one photograph of the main temple building from the outside which I took myself, although it's a bit dark. Maybe a shot of the temple complex might look good if you have any? What do you think? Best Wishes, [[User:GourangaUK|GourangaUK]] 08:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
265434 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265432 +++$+++ 265433 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.158853320E09 +++$+++ Hello Matisse, - I have never been allowed inside the actual temple as I'm not a native of India but I have seen photos of the main deities which do not look like the ones in the current pic. I believe they may be from a local temple in Puri, but wanted to be sure in case you'd taken it yourself somewhere inside the compound. I'll scan in some of my snaps and add to the article hopefully by this weekend. Thanks & Regards,  +++$+++ ::Hello Matisse, - I have never been allowed inside the actual temple as I'm not a native of India but I have seen photos of the main deities which do not look like the ones in the current pic. I believe they may be from a local temple in Puri, but wanted to be sure in case you'd taken it yourself somewhere inside the compound. I'll scan in some of my snaps and add to the article hopefully by this weekend. Thanks & Regards, [[User:GourangaUK|GourangaUK]] 08:42, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
265435 +++$+++ GourangaUK +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265432 +++$+++ 265434 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 09:14:00 +++$+++ 1.158855240E09 +++$+++ I hadn't seen the article - the picture you added is much better than the one I took! If I have any photos of smaller temple details I'll them in also. + Nice work on the edits. Ys,  +++$+++ :::I hadn't seen the article - the picture you added is much better than the one I took! If I have any photos of smaller temple details I'll them in also. + Nice work on the edits. Ys, [[User:GourangaUK|GourangaUK]] 09:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

19730 +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-26 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.269642540E09 +++$+++ Please tsop to add such ultradetailed categories, resulting in just one  people included in them. I think [[:category:People from the Province of Pordenone]] is already deteailed enough for them. Thanks and good work. -- +++$+++ Please tsop to add such ultradetailed categories, resulting in just one  people included in them. I think [[:category:People from the Province of Pordenone]] is already deteailed enough for them. Thanks and good work. --[[User:Attilios|&#39;&#39;&#39;Attilios&#39;&#39;&#39;]] ([[User talk:Attilios|talk]]) 15:29, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
19731 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19730 +++$+++ 19730 +++$+++ 2010-03-26 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.269643380E09 +++$+++ The first person in a given category is most often just the beginning. More people will be added as wikipedia expands. Remember: categories are not lists. Their point is precisely to give accurate information. That can hardly be seen as a drawback. Categorizing people by comune (municipality) cannot be seen as \"ultradetailed\", as that kind of categorization has been applied to most comparable countries. If somebody had been categorizing people by frazione, '''that''' would qualify as \"ultradetailed\". Compare, for instance, with the huge amount of locality categories in the USA and Britain. Given the fact that Italy has a relatively large population (and, crucially, how many Italian personalities have a wikipedia article), the amount of locality categories in Italy is clearly lower than in most comparable countries. +++$+++ :The first person in a given category is most often just the beginning. More people will be added as wikipedia expands. Remember: categories are not lists. Their point is precisely to give accurate information. That can hardly be seen as a drawback. Categorizing people by comune (municipality) cannot be seen as "ultradetailed", as that kind of categorization has been applied to most comparable countries. If somebody had been categorizing people by frazione, '''that''' would qualify as "ultradetailed". Compare, for instance, with the huge amount of locality categories in the USA and Britain. Given the fact that Italy has a relatively large population (and, crucially, how many Italian personalities have a wikipedia article), the amount of locality categories in Italy is clearly lower than in most comparable countries.[[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 15:43, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
19732 +++$+++ Attilios +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19730 +++$+++ 19731 +++$+++ 2010-03-27 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.269746580E09 +++$+++ I totally disagree with you! What is the point to give categories made by just one? What \"category\" is it? -- +++$+++ ::I totally disagree with you! What is the point to give categories made by just one? What "category" is it? --[[User:Attilios|&#39;&#39;&#39;Attilios&#39;&#39;&#39;]] ([[User talk:Attilios|talk]]) 20:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

571267 +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-05 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.165311540E09 +++$+++ Why did you revert a change I made to my OWN user page???- +++$+++ Why did you revert a change I made to my OWN user page???-[[User:Brian1979|FateSmiled&amp;DestinyLaughed]] 01:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
571268 +++$+++ Brian1979 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571267 +++$+++ 571267 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.165311960E09 +++$+++ It's cool.  Actually, I was a little hostile-seeming.  I was just confused, haha. - +++$+++ :It's cool.  Actually, I was a little hostile-seeming.  I was just confused, haha. -[[User:Brian1979|FateSmiled&amp;DestinyLaughed]] 01:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

544020 +++$+++ Firefoxman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544020 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-30 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.180579260E09 +++$+++ [[Talk:Evolution#Automatic_peer_review_per_TimVickers|Done]].  +++$+++ [[Talk:Evolution#Automatic_peer_review_per_TimVickers|Done]]. [[User:Firefoxman|'''ffm''']] [[User talk:Firefoxman|'''âœŽ<small>talk</small>''']] 19:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
544021 +++$+++ Firefoxman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544020 +++$+++ 544020 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.180580160E09 +++$+++ No problem.  +++$+++ :No problem. [[User:Firefoxman|'''ffm''']] [[User talk:Firefoxman|'''âœŽ<small>talk</small>''']] 19:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

19733 +++$+++ BrownHairedGirl +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-27 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.269747840E09 +++$+++ This will of course change if and when more articles are created.  If you want to expand wikipedia's coverage of Italy, please ''write more articles''. But do not create the categories until the articles exist to populate them. -- +++$+++ This will of course change if and when more articles are created.  If you want to expand wikipedia's coverage of Italy, please ''write more articles''. But do not create the categories until the articles exist to populate them. --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#996600; cursor: not-allowed;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 20:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
19734 +++$+++ BrownHairedGirl +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19733 +++$+++ 19733 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.269761040E09 +++$+++ I have nominated all but one of the sub-categories of {{cl|People from the Province of Pordenone}} for upmerger.  The discussion is at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion\/Log\/2010 March 27#People_from_the_Province_of_Pordenone]], where your comments will be welcome.  -- +++$+++ :I have nominated all but one of the sub-categories of {{cl|People from the Province of Pordenone}} for upmerger.  The discussion is at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 March 27#People_from_the_Province_of_Pordenone]], where your comments will be welcome.  --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#996600; cursor: not-allowed;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 00:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

281878 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-23 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.272010500E09 +++$+++ --<strong> +++$+++ --<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 01:15, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
281879 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281878 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.272010800E09 +++$+++ Oh, and you may like my recent work on [[Parthian Empire]]; there's a few mentions of Han-era China and Chinese histories which are relevant to Sino-Persian relations at the time.--<strong> +++$+++ ::Oh, and you may like my recent work on [[Parthian Empire]]; there's a few mentions of Han-era China and Chinese histories which are relevant to Sino-Persian relations at the time.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 01:20, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
281880 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281878 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-23 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.272029400E09 +++$+++ High praise from PericlesofAthens! I so honoured! I go burn incense for my ancestral temple right now! They be proud! I read about Parthia very soon!  +++$+++ :::High praise from PericlesofAthens! I so honoured! I go burn incense for my ancestral temple right now! They be proud! I read about Parthia very soon! [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 06:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

544023 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.180605000E09 +++$+++ Well, I did the peer review. I'm afraid I got a bit ranty, but, well, there's problems.  +++$+++ Well, I did the peer review. I'm afraid I got a bit ranty, but, well, there's problems. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 02:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
544024 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544023 +++$+++ 544023 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 03:14:00 +++$+++ 1.180606440E09 +++$+++ It's not that you've messed it up, it's that somewhere between March and April something went badly wrong, and reversion didn't happen.  +++$+++ :It's not that you've messed it up, it's that somewhere between March and April something went badly wrong, and reversion didn't happen. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 03:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
544025 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544023 +++$+++ 544024 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.180607820E09 +++$+++ One thing *do* be sure to include duplication events in the mutation section. And, for that matter, deletion mutations'd be a good idea. The current section neglects them.  +++$+++ ::One thing *do* be sure to include duplication events in the mutation section. And, for that matter, deletion mutations'd be a good idea. The current section neglects them. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 03:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
544026 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544023 +++$+++ 544025 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.180609140E09 +++$+++ Give me a minute. I'm trying to combine the March and May versions, then I want to add your last edits.   +++$+++ :::Give me a minute. I'm trying to combine the March and May versions, then I want to add your last edits.  [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 03:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

281881 +++$+++ Plunged +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-28 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.272486420E09 +++$+++ I noticed you've been editting the Three Kingdoms section a lot on this Wiki and I really like some of your articles, so I was wondering, if perhaps you'd like to contribute to a Wikia that focusses on the historical aspect of the Three Kingdoms. It's a rather new wikia but it's slowly growing in popularity and we could use someone like you! Please have a look and let me know what you think :-) -- +++$+++ I noticed you've been editting the Three Kingdoms section a lot on this Wiki and I really like some of your articles, so I was wondering, if perhaps you'd like to contribute to a Wikia that focusses on the historical aspect of the Three Kingdoms. It's a rather new wikia but it's slowly growing in popularity and we could use someone like you! Please have a look and let me know what you think :-) --[[User:Plunged|Plunged]] ([[User talk:Plunged|talk]]) 13:27, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
281882 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281881 +++$+++ 281881 +++$+++ 2010-04-29 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.272530340E09 +++$+++ Hi, thank you for the invitation! I admire the efforts to bring the historical facts to greater attention, and this is what I am trying to do here on Wikipedia. While I may do some minor work on the new wikia (such as correcting the Chinese characters -- may I suggest not using machine translations for those?), I'd hate to make the bulk of my work here redundant :( In the meantime, can I interest you and members of the Three Kingdoms Wiki to participate in our [[WP:3K|WikiProject Three Kingdoms]] here on Wikipedia? I am provisionally its leader right now and it could use some more history-oriented people such as you to clean up the massive dreg of fictional material in Three Kingdoms articles on Wikipedia. Cheers. :)  +++$+++ :Hi, thank you for the invitation! I admire the efforts to bring the historical facts to greater attention, and this is what I am trying to do here on Wikipedia. While I may do some minor work on the new wikia (such as correcting the Chinese characters -- may I suggest not using machine translations for those?), I'd hate to make the bulk of my work here redundant :( In the meantime, can I interest you and members of the Three Kingdoms Wiki to participate in our [[WP:3K|WikiProject Three Kingdoms]] here on Wikipedia? I am provisionally its leader right now and it could use some more history-oriented people such as you to clean up the massive dreg of fictional material in Three Kingdoms articles on Wikipedia. Cheers. :) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 01:39, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
281883 +++$+++ Plunged +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281881 +++$+++ 281882 +++$+++ 2010-04-29 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.272558060E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I understand you don't wanna make your work redundant, but you're welcome to edit anytime on the wikia of course :-) And I guess I can do the same for your 3K Project here :-) --  +++$+++ ::Anyway, I understand you don't wanna make your work redundant, but you're welcome to edit anytime on the wikia of course :-) And I guess I can do the same for your 3K Project here :-) -- [[User:Plunged|Plunged]] ([[User talk:Plunged|talk]]) 09:21, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
281884 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281881 +++$+++ 281883 +++$+++ 2010-04-29 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.272562440E09 +++$+++ I suppose the Chinese is easier for me since I'm a native speaker =D There probably isn't much a non-speaker can do...except, some sources  actually list the Chinese characters, like Rafe de Crespigny does in his books in print.  +++$+++ :::I suppose the Chinese is easier for me since I'm a native speaker =D There probably isn't much a non-speaker can do...except, some sources  actually list the Chinese characters, like Rafe de Crespigny does in his books in print. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 10:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

19738 +++$+++ Unscented +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19738 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-28 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.269812520E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed that you created [[Giovanni Siorpaes]], but listed no sources for the information contained in the article. According to Wikipedia's content policies, all information [[WP:V|must be verifiable]] from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Therefore, it's necessary to [[WP:CITE|cite your sources]] so other editors can check that the information included in the article is correct and matches the sources used.  Information not previously published in such sources is prohibited as [[WP:OR|original research]], since other editors can't verify it.  Unsourced information may be challenged and removed at any time, and articles that can't be verified are likely to be [[WP:DEL|deleted]].  Guidance on [[WP:CITE#HOW|how to cite your sources]] is available, and if you need any further help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page.-- +++$+++ Hi, I noticed that you created [[Giovanni Siorpaes]], but listed no sources for the information contained in the article. According to Wikipedia's content policies, all information [[WP:V|must be verifiable]] from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Therefore, it's necessary to [[WP:CITE|cite your sources]] so other editors can check that the information included in the article is correct and matches the sources used.  Information not previously published in such sources is prohibited as [[WP:OR|original research]], since other editors can't verify it.  Unsourced information may be challenged and removed at any time, and articles that can't be verified are likely to be [[WP:DEL|deleted]].  Guidance on [[WP:CITE#HOW|how to cite your sources]] is available, and if you need any further help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page.--[[User:Unscented|Unscented]] ([[User talk:Unscented|talk]]) 14:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
19739 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19738 +++$+++ 19738 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.269814200E09 +++$+++ Check out the link to the Italian version of wikipedia. It has an article about Giovanni Siorpaes: [[it:Giovanni Siorpaes]]. It includes a large bibliography.  +++$+++ :Check out the link to the Italian version of wikipedia. It has an article about Giovanni Siorpaes: [[it:Giovanni Siorpaes]]. It includes a large bibliography. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 15:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

544027 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.180609800E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 04:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
544028 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544027 +++$+++ 544027 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.180610940E09 +++$+++ Aye, I'm done. Sorry I wasn't clear! Also, sorry I leapt in like that, but I had an idea of what needed to be done to fix it, so...  +++$+++ :Aye, I'm done. Sorry I wasn't clear! Also, sorry I leapt in like that, but I had an idea of what needed to be done to fix it, so... [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 04:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
544029 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544027 +++$+++ 544028 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.180654980E09 +++$+++ No bother! Just sorry it was a bit ranty.  +++$+++ ::No bother! Just sorry it was a bit ranty. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 16:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

19740 +++$+++ Vegaswikian +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19740 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-28 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.269823140E09 +++$+++ The point of deleting them is very simply.  The articles made not attempt to establish notability.  Each wiki establish their own notability guidelines so being on one wiki does not mean an article will be of sufficient notability to be on others.  Also wikipedia is not a source for material on wikipedia.  So not only did the articles not meet [[WP:V] and [[WP:N]] they also failed [[WP:RS]].   +++$+++ The point of deleting them is very simply.  The articles made not attempt to establish notability.  Each wiki establish their own notability guidelines so being on one wiki does not mean an article will be of sufficient notability to be on others.  Also wikipedia is not a source for material on wikipedia.  So not only did the articles not meet [[WP:V] and [[WP:N]] they also failed [[WP:RS]].  [[User:Vegaswikian|Vegaswikian]] ([[User talk:Vegaswikian|talk]]) 17:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
19741 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19740 +++$+++ 19740 +++$+++ 2010-03-28 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.269830220E09 +++$+++ The Italian-language article about Piero Polo, for instance ([[it:Piero Polo]]) includes two profiles: http:\/\/www.sitodelciclismo.net\/coureurfiche.php?coureurid=3961 and http:\/\/www.museociclismo.it\/content\/ciclisti\/ciclista\/10547-Pietro-POLO\/index.html . Given some time, I (or some other editor) would have included them (as well as other stuff) in the article I just had '''started'''. The notability criteria of the Italian wikipedia, btw, are basically the same as those of the English-language wikipedia. Most articles begin as stubs. If every stub is killed off within 24 hours of its birth, even before it gets a chance to expand, it makes the job of starting new articles a rather tiresome task.  +++$+++ : The Italian-language article about Piero Polo, for instance ([[it:Piero Polo]]) includes two profiles: http://www.sitodelciclismo.net/coureurfiche.php?coureurid=3961 and http://www.museociclismo.it/content/ciclisti/ciclista/10547-Pietro-POLO/index.html . Given some time, I (or some other editor) would have included them (as well as other stuff) in the article I just had '''started'''. The notability criteria of the Italian wikipedia, btw, are basically the same as those of the English-language wikipedia. Most articles begin as stubs. If every stub is killed off within 24 hours of its birth, even before it gets a chance to expand, it makes the job of starting new articles a rather tiresome task. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 19:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

281886 +++$+++ Hacky +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281886 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-10 05:41:00 +++$+++ 1.276173660E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Hacky|hacky]] ([[User talk:Hacky|talk]]) 05:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
281887 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281886 +++$+++ 281886 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 09:16:00 +++$+++ 1.276186560E09 +++$+++ Hey, I clarified the context, though I made no serious attempt to copyedit the article...I hope this makes future copyediting easier. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Hey, I clarified the context, though I made no serious attempt to copyedit the article...I hope this makes future copyediting easier. Cheers. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 09:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

571269 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-05 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.165312320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for noticing my Wikibreak. As you can see, I'm back and I might just drop by your editor review. Regards.--<strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ Thanks for noticing my Wikibreak. As you can see, I'm back and I might just drop by your editor review. Regards.--<strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 01:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
571270 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571269 +++$+++ 571269 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.165314180E09 +++$+++ Ok, I left you a review. :-) Thanks for the userboxes\/Happy Birthday Susan cake. I went to the highlands so I could not bring you sand. Here's some fog instead. :-) Regards.--<strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Ok, I left you a review. :-) Thanks for the userboxes/Happy Birthday Susan cake. I went to the highlands so I could not bring you sand. Here's some fog instead. :-) Regards.--<strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 02:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
571271 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571269 +++$+++ 571270 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.165490640E09 +++$+++ Portugal has highlands?  OMG LOLZ.  '''[[User:culverin|<font color=\"darkblue\">Culv<\/font>]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::Portugal has highlands?  OMG LOLZ.  '''[[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">Culv</font>]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">rin</font>]][[Special:Random|<font color="green">?</font>]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]''' </sup></small> 03:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
571272 +++$+++ Drizzt_Jamo +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571269 +++$+++ 571271 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.167286320E09 +++$+++ You might want to cut down the msn language! <span style=\"background:#000\">[[Drizzt Do'Urden|<font color=\"red\">Drizzt<\/font>]] [[User:Drizzt_Jamo|<font color=\"FFCC00\">J<\/font>]][[User_talk:Drizzt_Jamo|<font color=\"green\">a<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::You might want to cut down the msn language! <span style="background:#000">[[Drizzt Do'Urden|<font color="red">Drizzt</font>]] [[User:Drizzt_Jamo|<font color="FFCC00">J</font>]][[User_talk:Drizzt_Jamo|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User:Drizzt_Jamo|<font color="FFCC00">m</font>]][[User_talk:Drizzt_Jamo|<font color="green">o</font>]]</span> 22:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

281889 +++$+++ White whirlwind +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-24 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.277438580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for inputting the filler info.  I am happy to collaborate with you on the page and whatever ones we are working on that happen to be in our mutual interests - we should probably use each other's skills and expertise to the benefit of all.  You still running the 3K WikiProject?  I can probably join the team.   +++$+++ Thanks for inputting the filler info.  I am happy to collaborate with you on the page and whatever ones we are working on that happen to be in our mutual interests - we should probably use each other's skills and expertise to the benefit of all.  You still running the 3K WikiProject?  I can probably join the team.  [[User:White whirlwind|White whirlwind]] ([[User talk:White whirlwind|talk]]) 21:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
281890 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281889 +++$+++ 281889 +++$+++ 2010-06-25 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.277454540E09 +++$+++ Yes, I still am running the Wikiproject, and it desperately needs new talent to keep the place running. A skilled translator such as you will be a great addition to the team! \u795d\u5408\u4f5c\u6109\u5feb!  +++$+++ :Yes, I still am running the Wikiproject, and it desperately needs new talent to keep the place running. A skilled translator such as you will be a great addition to the team! 祝合作愉快! [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 01:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
281891 +++$+++ White whirlwind +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281889 +++$+++ 281890 +++$+++ 2010-06-29 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.277864520E09 +++$+++ Well then, throw a special userbox on my userpage (if you have one) and let me know what I can do.  +++$+++ ::Well then, throw a special userbox on my userpage (if you have one) and let me know what I can do. [[User:White whirlwind|White whirlwind]] ([[User talk:White whirlwind|talk]]) 19:22, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

281892 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-06 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.278484080E09 +++$+++ Self-published sources cannot be used as sources on wikipedia unless written by a published and recognized expert in the field. Other wikis are never reliable sources. This applies to ''all'' topics equally. Your edit summary here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Imperishable_Night&action=historysubmit&diff=372005960&oldid=371928972] borders on a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]] and please do not remove maintenance tags without addressing them. There is no significant coverage by reliable third parties attributed in that article and it appears to be self-published which means it hasn't been released by a notable publisher which would attach notability to it. If you want to provide proper attribution for those claims per [[Wikipedia:V#Burden_of_evidence]] you're welcome to, but restoring those unreliable sources to that article isn't the answer, and isn't going to stick.-- +++$+++ Self-published sources cannot be used as sources on wikipedia unless written by a published and recognized expert in the field. Other wikis are never reliable sources. This applies to ''all'' topics equally. Your edit summary here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Imperishable_Night&action=historysubmit&diff=372005960&oldid=371928972] borders on a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]] and please do not remove maintenance tags without addressing them. There is no significant coverage by reliable third parties attributed in that article and it appears to be self-published which means it hasn't been released by a notable publisher which would attach notability to it. If you want to provide proper attribution for those claims per [[Wikipedia:V#Burden_of_evidence]] you're welcome to, but restoring those unreliable sources to that article isn't the answer, and isn't going to stick.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 23:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
281893 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281892 +++$+++ 281892 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.278492960E09 +++$+++ And you would do well to check my edit again, which was not an undo. I apologize for the personal attack, which was out of line and should have been kept to myself.  +++$+++ :And you would do well to check my edit again, which was not an undo. I apologize for the personal attack, which was out of line and should have been kept to myself. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 01:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
281894 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281892 +++$+++ 281893 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.278494280E09 +++$+++ Yes, the credits99 link still seems to be a self-published link, it doesn't resemble a reliable source at all [http:\/\/credits99.com\/members] and I'm not convinced notability has been addressed. Are both of those japanese articles fully about the game itself or are they about the creator? I can't view the text of the second one at all and the first one seems to actually be about a different game. As I said, don't remove maintenance tags without actually addressing them. You'd need to provide 2 articles fully about the game from reliable sources to address notability.-- +++$+++ ::Yes, the credits99 link still seems to be a self-published link, it doesn't resemble a reliable source at all [http://credits99.com/members] and I'm not convinced notability has been addressed. Are both of those japanese articles fully about the game itself or are they about the creator? I can't view the text of the second one at all and the first one seems to actually be about a different game. As I said, don't remove maintenance tags without actually addressing them. You'd need to provide 2 articles fully about the game from reliable sources to address notability.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 02:18, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
281895 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281892 +++$+++ 281894 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.278495120E09 +++$+++ The credits99 link is of a student club in Hitotsubashi University that hosted the lecture. Not self-published in the sense that it's independent from the game's maker, I'm sure. As for your other concerns, they are duly noted. Thank you.  +++$+++ :::The credits99 link is of a student club in Hitotsubashi University that hosted the lecture. Not self-published in the sense that it's independent from the game's maker, I'm sure. As for your other concerns, they are duly noted. Thank you. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 02:32, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
281896 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281892 +++$+++ 281895 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.278532200E09 +++$+++ Totally self-published. fails [[WP:RS]] self-published refers to anything. It doesn't matter if its independent of the subject or not. Self-published by the game-maker would make it at least reliable, but not usable for notability.-- +++$+++ ::::Totally self-published. fails [[WP:RS]] self-published refers to anything. It doesn't matter if its independent of the subject or not. Self-published by the game-maker would make it at least reliable, but not usable for notability.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 12:50, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
281897 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281892 +++$+++ 281896 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.278548760E09 +++$+++ As I have said on the edit summary, that source is only a transcription of the game maker's lecture, fully at the consent of the maker and thus reliable. Notability had not been on my mind when I used that source, my priority was fact checking (which a citation should be about). If you do not agree, you are at your liberty to ask a third party to assess the situation.  +++$+++ :::::As I have said on the edit summary, that source is only a transcription of the game maker's lecture, fully at the consent of the maker and thus reliable. Notability had not been on my mind when I used that source, my priority was fact checking (which a citation should be about). If you do not agree, you are at your liberty to ask a third party to assess the situation. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 17:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
281898 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281892 +++$+++ 281897 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.278571020E09 +++$+++ It doesn't matter it still fails [[WP:RS]]. Being at the consent of the maker doesn't make it a reliable source. It is content sitting on a self-published website. Where it came from, who approved, etc doesn't change it's status. I've given you ample opportunity to provide to provide a source which meets [[WP:RS]] and at this point I'm more then in right to completely remove the content and not just the inappropriate source.  If you insist on restoring the inappropriate source I'll do just that, under burden of evidence if you want the material in the article you need to provide the source. I'm willing to let it remain to give you time to find a proper source for now, but I highly recommend you read this section again [[Wikipedia:RS#Self-published_sources_.28online_and_paper.29]]. ''Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field.'' it doesn't matter what is claimed on that site, it is self-published and absolutely 100% cannot be used as a citation on anything on wikipedia, unless the article happened to be about that student organization and it could be verified that that site belonged to them. ''Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves,'' This site is not made by the maker himself, thus it's out. Without a reliable source, nothing said in that talk is usable as citation on wikipedia since the content hasn't been published and isn't accessible.-- +++$+++ ::::::It doesn't matter it still fails [[WP:RS]]. Being at the consent of the maker doesn't make it a reliable source. It is content sitting on a self-published website. Where it came from, who approved, etc doesn't change it's status. I've given you ample opportunity to provide to provide a source which meets [[WP:RS]] and at this point I'm more then in right to completely remove the content and not just the inappropriate source.  If you insist on restoring the inappropriate source I'll do just that, under burden of evidence if you want the material in the article you need to provide the source. I'm willing to let it remain to give you time to find a proper source for now, but I highly recommend you read this section again [[Wikipedia:RS#Self-published_sources_.28online_and_paper.29]]. ''Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field.'' it doesn't matter what is claimed on that site, it is self-published and absolutely 100% cannot be used as a citation on anything on wikipedia, unless the article happened to be about that student organization and it could be verified that that site belonged to them. ''Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves,'' This site is not made by the maker himself, thus it's out. Without a reliable source, nothing said in that talk is usable as citation on wikipedia since the content hasn't been published and isn't accessible.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 23:37, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
281899 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281892 +++$+++ 281898 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.278571860E09 +++$+++ I respectably disagree with your assessment and will ask for a third party's opinion if you decide to press the matter.  +++$+++ :::::::I respectably disagree with your assessment and will ask for a third party's opinion if you decide to press the matter. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 23:51, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

19751 +++$+++ 210.6.121.21 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-09 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.270838820E09 +++$+++ Generally the category is list by order. the most notable cat came first on the left bottom. I don't think you put Living people and year of birth came first is correct. POB, DOB is relatively no importance, at least less importance than occupation. [[Special:Contributions\/210.6.121.21|210.6.121.21]] ( +++$+++ Generally the category is list by order. the most notable cat came first on the left bottom. I don't think you put Living people and year of birth came first is correct. POB, DOB is relatively no importance, at least less importance than occupation. [[Special:Contributions/210.6.121.21|210.6.121.21]] ([[User talk:210.6.121.21|talk]]) 11:47, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
19752 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19751 +++$+++ 19751 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.270839240E09 +++$+++ Year of birth - Year of death - Place of birth is the usual (or at least most common) way to begin the category list. This is no coincidence, as the articles themselves usually begin by stating these facts. It is the general rule for encyclopedias.  +++$+++ :Year of birth - Year of death - Place of birth is the usual (or at least most common) way to begin the category list. This is no coincidence, as the articles themselves usually begin by stating these facts. It is the general rule for encyclopedias. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 11:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

544040 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544040 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-02 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.180769940E09 +++$+++ I've replied to the FAC. It has another long list, but the points are much smaller. Heredity's the biggie.  +++$+++ I've replied to the FAC. It has another long list, but the points are much smaller. Heredity's the biggie. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 00:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
544041 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544040 +++$+++ 544040 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.180787520E09 +++$+++ Tim, can you explain what is meant by \"Break 1\" and \"Break 2\" in the FAC.  I want to comment, but I'm not sure if there's some structure there.   +++$+++ :Tim, can you explain what is meant by "Break 1" and "Break 2" in the FAC.  I want to comment, but I'm not sure if there's some structure there.  [[User:Orangemarlin|Orangemarlin]] 05:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

19753 +++$+++ Voceditenore +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-09 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.270842360E09 +++$+++ The changes you have made to biographies of opera singers, composers, and other classical musicians will probably be reverted by editors in that area, e.g. [[:Category:French opera singers]] and [[:Category:Operatic baritones]] are far more essential, significant and defining for [[Jean P\xe9rier]] than [[:Category:1869 births]], [[:Category:1954 deaths]] and [[:Category:People from Paris]] \u2013  +++$+++ The changes you have made to biographies of opera singers, composers, and other classical musicians will probably be reverted by editors in that area, e.g. [[:Category:French opera singers]] and [[:Category:Operatic baritones]] are far more essential, significant and defining for [[Jean Périer]] than [[:Category:1869 births]], [[:Category:1954 deaths]] and [[:Category:People from Paris]] – [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 12:46, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
19754 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.270842840E09 +++$+++ Do special rules apply for musicians?  +++$+++ :Do special rules apply for musicians? [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 12:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
19755 +++$+++ Voceditenore +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 19754 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.270843740E09 +++$+++ No they apply to all biographies. I'm simply using this as an example. Your current mass re-arrangement of the categories in biographies is not at all helpful to readers and is contrary to Wikipedia editing guidelines. As I said, read [[WP:Category]]. \u2013  +++$+++ ::No they apply to all biographies. I'm simply using this as an example. Your current mass re-arrangement of the categories in biographies is not at all helpful to readers and is contrary to Wikipedia editing guidelines. As I said, read [[WP:Category]]. – [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 13:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
19756 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 19755 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.270844460E09 +++$+++ \"Mass re-arrangement\"? Hardly. Remember, we're only discussing the order in which the categories are usually placed. And the most common order just happens to be Year of birth - Year of death - Place of birth - the rest. Besides, that is no invention of mine. That's just the way it tends to be. Those are, after all, the first things usually mentioned in the article itself. As such, the order in which the musician categories (or indeed any particular professional categories) are placed means very little to me.  +++$+++ :::"Mass re-arrangement"? Hardly. Remember, we're only discussing the order in which the categories are usually placed. And the most common order just happens to be Year of birth - Year of death - Place of birth - the rest. Besides, that is no invention of mine. That's just the way it tends to be. Those are, after all, the first things usually mentioned in the article itself. As such, the order in which the musician categories (or indeed any particular professional categories) are placed means very little to me. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 13:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
19757 +++$+++ Michael Bednarek +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 19756 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.270845240E09 +++$+++ Please understand that your edits, and they are indeed on a massive scale, are disruptive. They don't contribute to the articles, they clog watchlists and edit histories, and they don't follow [[Wikipedia:Categorization of people]], [[WP:Category]] and its [[Wikipedia:FAQ\/Categorization|FAQ]], particularly the section \"it is generally clear that some categories \u2013 for example the birthplace or birth year of a person \u2013 are less important than others, such as their status as an Oscar or Nobel Prize winner.\" --  +++$+++ ::::Please understand that your edits, and they are indeed on a massive scale, are disruptive. They don't contribute to the articles, they clog watchlists and edit histories, and they don't follow [[Wikipedia:Categorization of people]], [[WP:Category]] and its [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization|FAQ]], particularly the section "it is generally clear that some categories – for example the birthplace or birth year of a person – are less important than others, such as their status as an Oscar or Nobel Prize winner." -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 13:34, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
19758 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 19757 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.270845780E09 +++$+++ Practice may vary between different professional categories, but if you consult wikipedia as a whole, the order I referred to is indeed the majority trend. Besides, I'm not on a crusade. If most editors who concentrate on musicians do indeed prefer a different order, they will no doubt rearrange the categories according to their own liking. As I said before, the order in which the categories of any particular professional group are arranged is definitely not one of my main priorities.  +++$+++ :::::Practice may vary between different professional categories, but if you consult wikipedia as a whole, the order I referred to is indeed the majority trend. Besides, I'm not on a crusade. If most editors who concentrate on musicians do indeed prefer a different order, they will no doubt rearrange the categories according to their own liking. As I said before, the order in which the categories of any particular professional group are arranged is definitely not one of my main priorities. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 13:43, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
19759 +++$+++ Matthew_hk +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.270855260E09 +++$+++ Generally the first one is most eye-catching, a common (wrong) practice is not a way to support you. Most biography in wikipedia lack of inline citation does not means wikipedia did not need citation.  +++$+++ :Generally the first one is most eye-catching, a common (wrong) practice is not a way to support you. Most biography in wikipedia lack of inline citation does not means wikipedia did not need citation. [[User:Matthew_hk|<span style="color:yellow; background-color:black;">Matthew_hk</span>]] [[User talk:Matthew_hk|''<font color="Blue">t</font>'']][[Special:Contributions/Matthew_hk|''<font color="red">c</font>'']] 16:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
19760 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 19759 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.270856040E09 +++$+++ As there is no generally accepted consensus as to the order in which the categories should be presented, one cannot speak of a given practice as \"wrong\" or \"right\" as such. The practice I have referred to is simply the '''majority''' practice. That doesn't make it the '''only''' legitimate practice (there can of course be no such thing, as there is no consensus), but the fact that it '''is''' the most common practice does give it a certain weight...  +++$+++ ::As there is no generally accepted consensus as to the order in which the categories should be presented, one cannot speak of a given practice as "wrong" or "right" as such. The practice I have referred to is simply the '''majority''' practice. That doesn't make it the '''only''' legitimate practice (there can of course be no such thing, as there is no consensus), but the fact that it '''is''' the most common practice does give it a certain weight... [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 16:34, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
19761 +++$+++ Voceditenore +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 19760 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.270858380E09 +++$+++ There ''is'' \"a generally accepted practice\", and it's not what you've been following. It is outlined in the three sets of Wikipedia guidelines that have been referred to you above. Please read them.  +++$+++ :::There ''is'' "a generally accepted practice", and it's not what you've been following. It is outlined in the three sets of Wikipedia guidelines that have been referred to you above. Please read them. [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 17:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
19762 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 19761 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.270863300E09 +++$+++ As a matter of fact, there isn't. [[Wikipedia:Categorization of people]] is very clear about that. I quote: \"Currently, people tend to be categorized by the following broad categories. There is currently '''no consensus about the order in which these categories should be placed at the bottom of an article'''.\" You can't very well get any clearer than that. As I wrote: '''no consensus'''.  +++$+++ ::::As a matter of fact, there isn't. [[Wikipedia:Categorization of people]] is very clear about that. I quote: "Currently, people tend to be categorized by the following broad categories. There is currently '''no consensus about the order in which these categories should be placed at the bottom of an article'''." You can't very well get any clearer than that. As I wrote: '''no consensus'''. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 18:35, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
19763 +++$+++ Matthew_hk +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 19753 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.270859580E09 +++$+++ Few people read mos does not mean Manual of Style does not exist. If no consensus, why you change the order? no consensus mean keep the current format, if the article is living people first keep it first, if it is bottom, keep it bottom. But now already a consensus.  +++$+++ :Few people read mos does not mean Manual of Style does not exist. If no consensus, why you change the order? no consensus mean keep the current format, if the article is living people first keep it first, if it is bottom, keep it bottom. But now already a consensus. [[User:Matthew_hk|<span style="color:yellow; background-color:black;">Matthew_hk</span>]] [[User talk:Matthew_hk|''<font color="Blue">t</font>'']][[Special:Contributions/Matthew_hk|''<font color="red">c</font>'']] 17:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

544043 +++$+++ Slrubenstein +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-02 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.180814640E09 +++$+++ Tim, I am having a series of conflicts with another editor at the [[Race]] page.  Would you ming going over this section [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Race#Non_sequitur] and see if you have something constructive to add?  Be forewarned, it is a lot, and a mess.  To put it most crudely, I think the issue is NPOV (Wobble\/Alun believes that there is only one biological definition of race and that is subspecies and any other terms biologists use for race must be synonyms for subspecies; I believe that just the past sixty years, and even now, biologists and physical anthropologists have had very different definitions of\/approaches to race and that they are not all reducible to subspecies, and that all these views must be represented in the article).  Wobble\/Alun thinks the issue is that he knows the science and I do not; he understands the scientific research and I do not; if I did I would agree with him.  This conflict is really wearing me down and I think there is a real need for other (and fresher) views.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Tim, I am having a series of conflicts with another editor at the [[Race]] page.  Would you ming going over this section [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Race#Non_sequitur] and see if you have something constructive to add?  Be forewarned, it is a lot, and a mess.  To put it most crudely, I think the issue is NPOV (Wobble/Alun believes that there is only one biological definition of race and that is subspecies and any other terms biologists use for race must be synonyms for subspecies; I believe that just the past sixty years, and even now, biologists and physical anthropologists have had very different definitions of/approaches to race and that they are not all reducible to subspecies, and that all these views must be represented in the article).  Wobble/Alun thinks the issue is that he knows the science and I do not; he understands the scientific research and I do not; if I did I would agree with him.  This conflict is really wearing me down and I think there is a real need for other (and fresher) views.  Thanks, [[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]]   |  [[User talk:Slrubenstein|Talk]] 13:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
544044 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544043 +++$+++ 544043 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.180837860E09 +++$+++ I haven't looked into the details, but this editor's general attitude and the attacks in edit summaries are unacceptable. I have warned them on their talk page.  +++$+++ :I haven't looked into the details, but this editor's general attitude and the attacks in edit summaries are unacceptable. I have warned them on their talk page. [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 19:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

281900 +++$+++ 94.168.119.106 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281900 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-08 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.278632460E09 +++$+++ Ah, don't mind second opinions at all.  In fact the new pagelout is properly a better arrangment.  It was WIP, since I had to overhaul the entire page from what it was before.  All help, especially from this editor who hasn't edited a wikipedia page seriously since 2004, are welcome.  Thanks! [[Special:Contributions\/94.168.119.106|94.168.119.106]] ( +++$+++ Ah, don't mind second opinions at all.  In fact the new pagelout is properly a better arrangment.  It was WIP, since I had to overhaul the entire page from what it was before.  All help, especially from this editor who hasn't edited a wikipedia page seriously since 2004, are welcome.  Thanks! [[Special:Contributions/94.168.119.106|94.168.119.106]] ([[User talk:94.168.119.106|talk]]) 16:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
281901 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281900 +++$+++ 281900 +++$+++ 2010-07-08 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.278632640E09 +++$+++ Keep on the good work! The page is much more informative and not as catering to otaku as before =)  +++$+++ :Keep on the good work! The page is much more informative and not as catering to otaku as before =) [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 16:44, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
281902 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281900 +++$+++ 281900 +++$+++ 2010-08-04 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.280908680E09 +++$+++ [[User:BabelStone]] very interested in 3K; knowledgeable too. &bull;&nbsp; +++$+++ * [[User:BabelStone]] very interested in 3K; knowledgeable too. &bull;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 00:58, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
281903 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281900 +++$+++ 281900 +++$+++ 2010-08-04 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.280909100E09 +++$+++ And I just noticed that you have notified him in our project too! Thanks for keeping an eye out.  +++$+++ :And I just noticed that you have notified him in our project too! Thanks for keeping an eye out. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 01:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

544047 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544047 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-02 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.180833720E09 +++$+++ This is looking really good now, with only a few scattered points outside of \"Evolution of Life\", which is still very disorganised. (Ediacaran before eukaryotes, a progressive description followed by \"life isn't progressive\", etc)  +++$+++ This is looking really good now, with only a few scattered points outside of "Evolution of Life", which is still very disorganised. (Ediacaran before eukaryotes, a progressive description followed by "life isn't progressive", etc) [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 18:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
544048 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544047 +++$+++ 544047 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.180835040E09 +++$+++ Just ignore everything after the word \"now\" in that statement. You work too damn fast. Couple more minor comments added to my review, but, really, there's not much of significance left. Only one sentence that could be considered truly problematic.  +++$+++ :Just ignore everything after the word "now" in that statement. You work too damn fast. Couple more minor comments added to my review, but, really, there's not much of significance left. Only one sentence that could be considered truly problematic. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 18:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

281904 +++$+++ Prime Blue +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-08 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.281292140E09 +++$+++ It would be highly appreciated if you came over to the [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles)|MOS:JP talk page]] and helped find a solution. Thank you in advance.  +++$+++ It would be highly appreciated if you came over to the [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles)|MOS:JP talk page]] and helped find a solution. Thank you in advance. [[User:Prime Blue|Prime Blue]] ([[User talk:Prime Blue|talk]]) 11:29, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
281905 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281904 +++$+++ 281904 +++$+++ 2010-08-23 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.282632720E09 +++$+++ If you could help them, or know anyone else who would help, I would yet again be eternally grateful... &bull;&nbsp; +++$+++ * If you could help them, or know anyone else who would help, I would yet again be eternally grateful... &bull;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 23:52, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
281906 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281904 +++$+++ 281904 +++$+++ 2010-08-24 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.282668000E09 +++$+++ I'll be glad to help. The Chinese source you gave....I think it would be difficult to argue for its inclusion in its current state, since wretch.cc is a blog site. Of course the images themselves could be argued that they are over 100 years old, but the copyright statuses aren't really clear on that site, and unless the Chinese uploaders own those photos themselves, I can't imagine they can be of much help =\\ But I'll see what I can do, at least in translation.  +++$+++ :I'll be glad to help. The Chinese source you gave....I think it would be difficult to argue for its inclusion in its current state, since wretch.cc is a blog site. Of course the images themselves could be argued that they are over 100 years old, but the copyright statuses aren't really clear on that site, and unless the Chinese uploaders own those photos themselves, I can't imagine they can be of much help =\ But I'll see what I can do, at least in translation. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 09:40, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
281907 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281904 +++$+++ 281906 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.282720380E09 +++$+++ Is there any info on the blog about '''who took the photos'''? If we can show that the photographer has been dead for 70 years, then hey presto, the images are PD... there are other image problems in the review, too... &bull;&nbsp; +++$+++ ::Is there any info on the blog about '''who took the photos'''? If we can show that the photographer has been dead for 70 years, then hey presto, the images are PD... there are other image problems in the review, too... &bull;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 00:13, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
281908 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281904 +++$+++ 281907 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.282722420E09 +++$+++ I don't think the info's on the blog. Maybe ask the uploaders or the bloggers where exactly did they get the images.  +++$+++ :::I don't think the info's on the blog. Maybe ask the uploaders or the bloggers where exactly did they get the images. [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 00:47, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
281909 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281904 +++$+++ 281907 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.282722780E09 +++$+++ Oh, so the question's not actually about the source but actually about the author and date now...? Then I think the best approach would be to find those sources directly, if possible...  +++$+++ :::Oh, so the question's not actually about the source but actually about the author and date now...? Then I think the best approach would be to find those sources directly, if possible... [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 00:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

544049 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-02 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.180835640E09 +++$+++ The [[Ediacaran biota]] is actually pretty complex...  +++$+++ The [[Ediacaran biota]] is actually pretty complex... [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 18:54, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
544050 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544049 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.180836360E09 +++$+++ Right. That gets that. Just... well... You know. It's an article I've been working on just now, [[Ediacaran biota]], so... Added a couple notes on minor points I wasn't quitre sure how to rephrase over at the FAC, but there's not much left.  +++$+++ ::Right. That gets that. Just... well... You know. It's an article I've been working on just now, [[Ediacaran biota]], so... Added a couple notes on minor points I wasn't quitre sure how to rephrase over at the FAC, but there's not much left. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 19:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

450547 +++$+++ Neutralhomer +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ 450547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311714000E09 +++$+++ <small style=\"white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:#900;">Neutralhomer</span>]] • [[User talk:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:Black;">Talk</span>]] • 14:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)</small> 14:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
450548 +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ Wehwalt +++$+++ 450547 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-26 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311714120E09 +++$+++ Great!  Welcome back.-- +++$+++ ::Great!  Welcome back.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt#top|talk]]) 14:02, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

19764 +++$+++ HWV258 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-01 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.277976900E09 +++$+++ Could you please explain [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=George_Frideric_Handel&curid=12775&diff=371123058&oldid=369424714 this] edit? Why move one \"People\" category (when you left two behind)? If you must move categories around (and I see no practical benefit in doing so), could you please maintain consistency? Thanks. <small>(If I'm honest, I'd suggest that there must be hundreds of better things to do on WP\u2014for someone obviously willing to spend time on the project.)<\/small> <font style=\"color:Navy;background:#C2D1F0;font-family:Arial;\" size=\"2\">&nbsp; +++$+++ Could you please explain [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Frideric_Handel&curid=12775&diff=371123058&oldid=369424714 this] edit? Why move one "People" category (when you left two behind)? If you must move categories around (and I see no practical benefit in doing so), could you please maintain consistency? Thanks. <small>(If I'm honest, I'd suggest that there must be hundreds of better things to do on WP—for someone obviously willing to spend time on the project.)</small> <font style="color:Navy;background:#C2D1F0;font-family:Arial;" size="2">&nbsp;[[User:HWV258|HWV258]]</font><font style="color:Navy;background:#C2D1F0;font-family:Arial;text-decoration:blink;" size="2">[[User_talk:HWV258|.]]&nbsp;</font> 02:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
19765 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19764 +++$+++ 19764 +++$+++ 2010-07-01 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.278012540E09 +++$+++ Nothing mysterious about that edit. It merely follows the practice according to which the category lists usually begin: Date of birth - Date of Death - Locality of birth. A question of standardisation. The other categories you were referring to (the feudal state of which he was a subject etc) are not of a kind to be normally placed in the beginning of a list of categories.  +++$+++ :Nothing mysterious about that edit. It merely follows the practice according to which the category lists usually begin: Date of birth - Date of Death - Locality of birth. A question of standardisation. The other categories you were referring to (the feudal state of which he was a subject etc) are not of a kind to be normally placed in the beginning of a list of categories. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 12:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
19766 +++$+++ Michael Bednarek +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19764 +++$+++ 19765 +++$+++ 2010-07-01 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.278015000E09 +++$+++ As you and others have pointed out, there is no standard for the order of categories. Editing articles purely for the purpose of ordering categories in your preference, as in the edit quoted by HWV258, is unhelpful and disruptive. --  +++$+++ ::As you and others have pointed out, there is no standard for the order of categories. Editing articles purely for the purpose of ordering categories in your preference, as in the edit quoted by HWV258, is unhelpful and disruptive. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 13:10, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
19767 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19764 +++$+++ 19766 +++$+++ 2010-07-01 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.278015240E09 +++$+++ There is no unanimously accepted standard, but there is a majority practice, and that's the one I'm following. It is not a question of my personal preference, but of the preference of the majority.  +++$+++ :::There is no unanimously accepted standard, but there is a majority practice, and that's the one I'm following. It is not a question of my personal preference, but of the preference of the majority. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 13:14, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

571273 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571273 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-05 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.165315320E09 +++$+++ If I have <tt><nowiki>{{User:Dfrg.msc\/Userbox\/Resentment}}<\/nowiki><\/tt> on my userpage, does that mean you will automatically dislike me as well? (I refer you to the word 'mutual', and its connotations). I await your response to this very important and non-trivial question. <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ If I have <tt><nowiki>{{User:Dfrg.msc/Userbox/Resentment}}</nowiki></tt> on my userpage, does that mean you will automatically dislike me as well? (I refer you to the word 'mutual', and its connotations). I await your response to this very important and non-trivial question. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 02:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
571274 +++$+++ riana_dzasta +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571273 +++$+++ 571273 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.165319040E09 +++$+++ Lol! Fair enough. I wouldn't put it on my page anyway, I don't dislike or resent you (much). <span style=\"font-family:Trebuchet MS\"> +++$+++ :Lol! Fair enough. I wouldn't put it on my page anyway, I don't dislike or resent you (much). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_'''[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]'''</span> 03:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

544056 +++$+++ Plumbago +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-03 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.180887660E09 +++$+++ Hi [[User:TimVickers|Tim]].  I've put a few more comments [[User:Plumbago\/Sandbox#Evolution_FA|here]].  Will keep plodding through to the end!  Article's pretty good to my mind - I'm proposing tweaks that possibly just reflect my bias.  Cheers, -- +++$+++ Hi [[User:TimVickers|Tim]].  I've put a few more comments [[User:Plumbago/Sandbox#Evolution_FA|here]].  Will keep plodding through to the end!  Article's pretty good to my mind - I'm proposing tweaks that possibly just reflect my bias.  Cheers, --[[User:Plumbago|Plumbago]] 09:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
544057 +++$+++ Plumbago +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544056 +++$+++ 544056 +++$+++ 2007-06-04 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.180976880E09 +++$+++ Ah - you saw them.  Brilliant.  I'll keep pressing on when I have time.  I think you're doing a great job balancing my quibbles against the more general readability of the article.  Kudos.  Cheers, -- +++$+++ :Ah - you saw them.  Brilliant.  I'll keep pressing on when I have time.  I think you're doing a great job balancing my quibbles against the more general readability of the article.  Kudos.  Cheers, --[[User:Plumbago|Plumbago]] 10:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

90676 +++$+++ Tempac3 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ 90676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.309689660E09 +++$+++ Please to assist in this glorious task of write.  +++$+++ Please to assist in this glorious task of write. [[User:Tempac3|Tempac3]] ([[User talk:Tempac3|talk]]) 03:41, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
90677 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ 90676 +++$+++ 90676 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.309719420E09 +++$+++ What exactly do you want to create? List of inventions sorted by topic rather than by year? If so, good idea! I'll try to help..  +++$+++ :What exactly do you want to create? List of inventions sorted by topic rather than by year? If so, good idea! I'll try to help.. [[User:Greyhood|<font color="darkgrey">Grey</font><font color="grey">Hood</font>]] [[User talk:Greyhood|<font color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 11:57, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
90678 +++$+++ Tempac3 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ 90676 +++$+++ 90677 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.309735260E09 +++$+++ Yes. And its compact format would allow to also include discoveries.  +++$+++ ::Yes. And its compact format would allow to also include discoveries. [[User:Tempac3|Tempac3]] ([[User talk:Tempac3|talk]]) 16:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
90679 +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ Greyhood +++$+++ 90676 +++$+++ 90678 +++$+++ 2011-07-03 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.309735500E09 +++$+++ OK, though it is more logical to include discoveries into a separate list.  +++$+++ :::OK, though it is more logical to include discoveries into a separate list. [[User:Greyhood|<font color="darkgrey">Grey</font><font color="grey">Hood</font>]] [[User talk:Greyhood|<font color="black"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 16:25, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

could not match дунгане
281914 +++$+++ дунгане +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-27 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.285580160E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Second_Sino-Japanese_War#The_sockpuppetry_on_this_article_is_so_obvious_that_its_not_even_funny The sockpuppetry on this article is so obvious that its not even funny] +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Second_Sino-Japanese_War#The_sockpuppetry_on_this_article_is_so_obvious_that_its_not_even_funny The sockpuppetry on this article is so obvious that its not even funny][[User:Дунгане|Дунгане]] ([[User talk:Дунгане|talk]]) 02:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
281915 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281914 +++$+++ 281914 +++$+++ 2010-09-27 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.285583940E09 +++$+++ This message or a similar one left on several editors' talk pages (see forex [[User talk:Nlu]]); [[User:\u0414\u0443\u043d\u0433\u0430\u043d\u0435|\u0414\u0443\u043d\u0433\u0430\u043d\u0435]] advised to collect hard evidence and take it to [[WP:SPI]] if the problem continues &bull;&nbsp; +++$+++ * This message or a similar one left on several editors' talk pages (see forex [[User talk:Nlu]]); [[User:Дунгане|Дунгане]] advised to collect hard evidence and take it to [[WP:SPI]] if the problem continues &bull;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 03:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

527583 +++$+++ Tellyaddict +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-04 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.175716620E09 +++$+++ Hi, why did you delete {{tl|Infobox North East England place}}, that was a reasonably new and valuable template for [[WP:T&W|WikiProject North East England]]? <b> +++$+++ Hi, why did you delete {{tl|Infobox North East England place}}, that was a reasonably new and valuable template for [[WP:T&W|WikiProject North East England]]? <b>[[User:Tellyaddict|<font color="FF4040">Te</font><font color="FF9900">ll</font><font color="FFEE00">y</font>]][[User talk:Tellyaddict|<font color="FFEE00">a</font><font color="FF9900">ddi</font><font color="FF4040">ct</font>]]</b> 12:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
527584 +++$+++ Tellyaddict +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527583 +++$+++ 527583 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.175720220E09 +++$+++ Oh I didnt know it had been the result of a TfD debate, I'm not criticising but I thought after deletion you were meant to provide a link in the reason for deletion to the deletion debate if their was one?  <b> +++$+++ : Oh I didnt know it had been the result of a TfD debate, I'm not criticising but I thought after deletion you were meant to provide a link in the reason for deletion to the deletion debate if their was one?  <b>[[User:Tellyaddict|<font color="FF4040">Te</font><font color="FF9900">ll</font><font color="FFEE00">y</font>]][[User talk:Tellyaddict|<font color="FFEE00">a</font><font color="FF9900">ddi</font><font color="FF4040">ct</font>]]</b> 13:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
527585 +++$+++ Tellyaddict +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.175722200E09 +++$+++ Not meaning to sound rude or uncivil by my comment, I hope you didnt take offence to it [[Image:smile.png|16px]].<b> +++$+++ ::: Not meaning to sound rude or uncivil by my comment, I hope you didnt take offence to it [[Image:smile.png|16px]].<b>[[User:Tellyaddict|<font color="FF4040">Te</font><font color="FF9900">ll</font><font color="FFEE00">y</font>]][[User talk:Tellyaddict|<font color="FFEE00">a</font><font color="FF9900">ddi</font><font color="FF4040">ct</font>]]</b> 14:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
527586 +++$+++ Tellyaddict +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.175745060E09 +++$+++ Well if you want to add the responded template just add {{tl|responded}} and if you did not respond then add {{tl|not responded}}, if you would like me to make any images like that for you or ones similar to on my Userpage just leave me a note, if you want I can have it done by tomorrow. Thanks and no negative feelings, maybe I came over as snappy. Cheers - <b> +++$+++ :::: Well if you want to add the responded template just add {{tl|responded}} and if you did not respond then add {{tl|not responded}}, if you would like me to make any images like that for you or ones similar to on my Userpage just leave me a note, if you want I can have it done by tomorrow. Thanks and no negative feelings, maybe I came over as snappy. Cheers - <b>[[User:Tellyaddict|<font color="FF4040">Te</font><font color="FF9900">ll</font><font color="FFEE00">y</font>]][[User talk:Tellyaddict|<font color="FFEE00">a</font><font color="FF9900">ddi</font><font color="FF4040">ct</font>]]</b> 20:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

281916 +++$+++  +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-27 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.288163040E09 +++$+++ }}  [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 00:04, 27 October 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ }}  [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 00:04, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
281917 +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ Deadkid dk +++$+++ 281916 +++$+++ 281916 +++$+++ 2010-10-28 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.288305660E09 +++$+++ Aww damn, 4.9k hits =\\  +++$+++ :Aww damn, 4.9k hits =\ [[User:Deadkid dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Deadkid dk#top|talk]]) 15:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

19774 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-02 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.286063040E09 +++$+++ I am in the process of merging {{tld|catmore1}} with {{tld|catmore2}}\/{{tl|cat more}}.  It would be great if when you make new categories, if you could use {{tl|cat more}} rather than {{tld|catmore1}}.  Thanks!  +++$+++ I am in the process of merging {{tld|catmore1}} with {{tld|catmore2}}/{{tl|cat more}}.  It would be great if when you make new categories, if you could use {{tl|cat more}} rather than {{tld|catmore1}}.  Thanks! [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] ([[User talk:Plastikspork|talk]]) 16:44, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
19775 +++$+++ Plastikspork +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19774 +++$+++ 19774 +++$+++ 2010-10-03 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.286144820E09 +++$+++ Again, could you use {{tl|cat more}}?  So I don't have to do [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Category%3APridnestrovie_Communist_Party_politicians&action=historysubmit&diff=388477464&oldid=388430823 this], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Category%3AProriv_%28Transnistria%29_politicians&action=historysubmit&diff=388477475&oldid=388435157 this], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Category%3APeople_from_Gernsbach&action=historysubmit&diff=388477449&oldid=388327977 this], and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Category:People_from_Cahul_District&diff=prev&oldid=388477444 this] every time you create a category?  Thanks!  +++$+++ : Again, could you use {{tl|cat more}}?  So I don't have to do [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3APridnestrovie_Communist_Party_politicians&action=historysubmit&diff=388477464&oldid=388430823 this], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3AProriv_%28Transnistria%29_politicians&action=historysubmit&diff=388477475&oldid=388435157 this], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3APeople_from_Gernsbach&action=historysubmit&diff=388477449&oldid=388327977 this], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:People_from_Cahul_District&diff=prev&oldid=388477444 this] every time you create a category?  Thanks! [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] ([[User talk:Plastikspork|talk]]) 15:27, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

544063 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544063 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-04 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.180996020E09 +++$+++ This order?  +++$+++ This order? [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 15:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
544064 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544063 +++$+++ 544063 +++$+++ 2007-06-04 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.180996380E09 +++$+++ Except it was identical to [[:Image:Speciation modes edit.svg]]. Deleted and swapped in the old one.  +++$+++ :Except it was identical to [[:Image:Speciation modes edit.svg]]. Deleted and swapped in the old one. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 15:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

19776 +++$+++ MeegsC +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19776 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-30 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.293712200E09 +++$+++ Hi Monegasque:  On June 26, 2007, you added some census details (a breakout of \"white\" ancestry) to the [[Cape May County, New Jersey]] article.  I'm having trouble finding the information on the US Census Bureau website, as it's not on the summary or breakout pages for the county's demographics.  Can you please direct me to the relevant page, so that I can link it as a reference?  Otherwise, the details will have to be removed as they can't be verified. Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi Monegasque:  On June 26, 2007, you added some census details (a breakout of "white" ancestry) to the [[Cape May County, New Jersey]] article.  I'm having trouble finding the information on the US Census Bureau website, as it's not on the summary or breakout pages for the county's demographics.  Can you please direct me to the relevant page, so that I can link it as a reference?  Otherwise, the details will have to be removed as they can't be verified. Thanks! [[User:MeegsC|MeegsC]] | [[User talk:MeegsC|Talk]] 04:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
19777 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19776 +++$+++ 19776 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.293725220E09 +++$+++ The source is Census 2000, Summary File 3 (SF 3) - Sample Data (First ancestry reported). I did the percentage math and included only those groups which make up at least 5% of the population in a given area.  +++$+++ :The source is Census 2000, Summary File 3 (SF 3) - Sample Data (First ancestry reported). I did the percentage math and included only those groups which make up at least 5% of the population in a given area. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 08:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

281922 +++$+++ Rockvee +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281922 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-29 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.170064440E09 +++$+++ I am not the one who first added a speedy deletion tag to the artile Robert MacTaggart - it's someone else added the speedy deletion tag first, then another person blanked the page because he think Robert MacTaggart is not notable, and I reverted the blanking. By the way, the article Robert MacTaggart does not meet the criteria of [[WP:Bio]].  +++$+++ I am not the one who first added a speedy deletion tag to the artile Robert MacTaggart - it's someone else added the speedy deletion tag first, then another person blanked the page because he think Robert MacTaggart is not notable, and I reverted the blanking. By the way, the article Robert MacTaggart does not meet the criteria of [[WP:Bio]]. [[User:Rockvee|Rockvee]] 01:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
281923 +++$+++ Grovermj +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281922 +++$+++ 281922 +++$+++ 2007-02-01 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.170329580E09 +++$+++ Yeah you're right, i wasnt thinking at the time, so thanks very much for your time, efforts, and contributions to the article.  +++$+++ :Yeah you're right, i wasnt thinking at the time, so thanks very much for your time, efforts, and contributions to the article. [[User:Grovermj|Grover]] 03:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

281925 +++$+++ Tennis expert +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-21 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.172108760E09 +++$+++ Hey there.  Whenever I have added comments to the talk pages of the users who are making these changes and then looked at their home cities, Knoxville, Tennessee and the same Internet provider come up.  This is why I believe it is the same person, using dynamically assigned IP addresses. Administrators can do a block based on IP address ranges, but I'm not sure that would be practical in this case because a huge number of people use that Internet provider and they would end up being blocked collaterally.  We just need to be diligent about fighting the vandalism this user is determined to inflict, at least until consensus changes, which I don't think will happen.  We also could file a report on [[WP:AIV]] or [[WP:ANI]] and request semi-protection of the articles through [[WP:RFP]] so that IP addresses cannot edit them.  Thanks '''very much''' for helping to fight vandalism on tennis pages as this is a recurring problem.   +++$+++ Hey there.  Whenever I have added comments to the talk pages of the users who are making these changes and then looked at their home cities, Knoxville, Tennessee and the same Internet provider come up.  This is why I believe it is the same person, using dynamically assigned IP addresses. Administrators can do a block based on IP address ranges, but I'm not sure that would be practical in this case because a huge number of people use that Internet provider and they would end up being blocked collaterally.  We just need to be diligent about fighting the vandalism this user is determined to inflict, at least until consensus changes, which I don't think will happen.  We also could file a report on [[WP:AIV]] or [[WP:ANI]] and request semi-protection of the articles through [[WP:RFP]] so that IP addresses cannot edit them.  Thanks '''very much''' for helping to fight vandalism on tennis pages as this is a recurring problem.  [[User:Tennis expert|Tennis expert]] 17:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
281926 +++$+++ HJensen +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281925 +++$+++ 281925 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.172130180E09 +++$+++ FYI I have reported one IP for violation of the 3RR rule [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/3RR#User:_72.155.112.205_reported_by_User:HJensen_.28Result:.29 here]-- +++$+++ : FYI I have reported one IP for violation of the 3RR rule [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:_72.155.112.205_reported_by_User:HJensen_.28Result:.29 here]--[[User:HJensen|HJ]] 23:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
281927 +++$+++ Tennis expert +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281925 +++$+++ 281926 +++$+++ 2007-02-22 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.172192160E09 +++$+++ I thought you might be interested in this.  An entry about [[User:Lman1987|Lman1987's]] recent editing history has been posted on the administrators' noticeboard.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#User:Lman1987]   +++$+++ ::I thought you might be interested in this.  An entry about [[User:Lman1987|Lman1987's]] recent editing history has been posted on the administrators' noticeboard.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#User:Lman1987]  [[User:Tennis expert|Tennis expert]] 16:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

19783 +++$+++ 117Avenue +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19783 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-08 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.297224900E09 +++$+++ Hello. Are you aware of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons]]? All additions should be referenced, and your recent addition to [[Drew Roy]] wasn't. I was just wondering if you had any source for his birthday? Thanks for your time.  +++$+++ Hello. Are you aware of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons]]? All additions should be referenced, and your recent addition to [[Drew Roy]] wasn't. I was just wondering if you had any source for his birthday? Thanks for your time. [[User:117Avenue|117Avenue]] ([[User talk:117Avenue|talk]]) 20:15, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
19784 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19783 +++$+++ 19783 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.297227600E09 +++$+++ As to your first question: Rhetorical questions are best left unanswered. As to your second question: Of course I have. And, more importantly, the article itself includes not one but two sources. The sources are obvious enough: the two external links in the article. Somehow you seem to have missed them.  +++$+++ :As to your first question: Rhetorical questions are best left unanswered. As to your second question: Of course I have. And, more importantly, the article itself includes not one but two sources. The sources are obvious enough: the two external links in the article. Somehow you seem to have missed them. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 21:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
19785 +++$+++ 117Avenue +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19783 +++$+++ 19784 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.297236540E09 +++$+++ IMDb and TV.com are not reliable sources, as they are both user contributed websites, much like Wikipedia.  +++$+++ ::IMDb and TV.com are not reliable sources, as they are both user contributed websites, much like Wikipedia. [[User:117Avenue|117Avenue]] ([[User talk:117Avenue|talk]]) 23:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

281929 +++$+++ TonyTheTiger +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281929 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-04 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.173009780E09 +++$+++ Since you are very influential in the content of the [[Tiger Woods]] page, I thought I would ask you about [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tiger_Woods&diff=109719477&oldid=108164092 this edit].  Most celebrities include spousal information in their infoboxes.  I feel it should be readded.  However, I don't want to step on your toes.  I also think, it will be appropriate to add an offspring entry as well in the near future.  Respond at my talk page at your convenience.  +++$+++ Since you are very influential in the content of the [[Tiger Woods]] page, I thought I would ask you about [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tiger_Woods&diff=109719477&oldid=108164092 this edit].  Most celebrities include spousal information in their infoboxes.  I feel it should be readded.  However, I don't want to step on your toes.  I also think, it will be appropriate to add an offspring entry as well in the near future.  Respond at my talk page at your convenience. [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] 04:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
281930 +++$+++ TonyTheTiger +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281929 +++$+++ 281929 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.173431340E09 +++$+++ You are the man for the [[Tiger Woods]] page so I wanted to run some things by you.  Should his spouse's maiden name be in the infobox or her married name?  Also, the page seems to wikify years even when not part of a full date.  According to [[WP:DATE]], I think the first occurence of a year might be linked <nowiki>[[2007 in golf|2007]] or [[2000 in sports|2000]], but not [[2007]] or [[2000]]<\/nowiki>. [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|talk]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|cont]]\/ +++$+++ :You are the man for the [[Tiger Woods]] page so I wanted to run some things by you.  Should his spouse's maiden name be in the infobox or her married name?  Also, the page seems to wikify years even when not part of a full date.  According to [[WP:DATE]], I think the first occurence of a year might be linked <nowiki>[[2007 in golf|2007]] or [[2000 in sports|2000]], but not [[2007]] or [[2000]]</nowiki>. [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|cont]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]])</small> 01:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

19788 +++$+++ Namiba +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-27 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.298797140E09 +++$+++ Monegasque, an experienced editor such as your self knows that you cannot add uncited ethnicity categories to an article, nevermind a BLP. Yet you just did so and have been asked repeatedly in the past to discontinue this practice. I am going to ask you to stop for the last time. Thank you-- +++$+++ Monegasque, an experienced editor such as your self knows that you cannot add uncited ethnicity categories to an article, nevermind a BLP. Yet you just did so and have been asked repeatedly in the past to discontinue this practice. I am going to ask you to stop for the last time. Thank you--[[User:Namiba|TM]] 00:59, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
19789 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19788 +++$+++ 19788 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.298799180E09 +++$+++ \"Repeatedly\"? Exactly once, and that was in 2008. As to this case: If photographs mean nothing to you, there is, for instance, this: http:\/\/www.freebase.com\/view\/en\/michael_beasley_1989  By the way, I have no recollection of ever having recieved any messages from you before this, which is why your choice of words seems a little odd. +++$+++ : "Repeatedly"? Exactly once, and that was in 2008. As to this case: If photographs mean nothing to you, there is, for instance, this: http://www.freebase.com/view/en/michael_beasley_1989  By the way, I have no recollection of ever having recieved any messages from you before this, which is why your choice of words seems a little odd.[[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 01:33, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
19790 +++$+++ Namiba +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19788 +++$+++ 19789 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.298955180E09 +++$+++ Perhaps I am just thinking of the numerous times I have looked back and removed an uncited category you added but did not say anything. Anyway, no, pictures mean absolutely nothing. It is called [[WP:OR]]. It is completely unacceptable and I have had this conversation in multiple places on numerous occasions. Familiarize yourself with [[WP:BLPCAT]]. Thanks-- +++$+++ ::Perhaps I am just thinking of the numerous times I have looked back and removed an uncited category you added but did not say anything. Anyway, no, pictures mean absolutely nothing. It is called [[WP:OR]]. It is completely unacceptable and I have had this conversation in multiple places on numerous occasions. Familiarize yourself with [[WP:BLPCAT]]. Thanks--[[User:Namiba|TM]] 20:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

281933 +++$+++ Zaxem +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281933 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-05 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.173094680E09 +++$+++ I think I'd recommend this.  +++$+++ I think I'd recommend this. [[User:Zaxem|Zaxem]] 03:38, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
281934 +++$+++ Tennis expert +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281933 +++$+++ 281933 +++$+++ 2007-03-05 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.173095820E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for seeking my opinion about this.  I've added something to my own discussion page about this and don't want to clutter Supertigerman's page with a \"copy and paste\" of those comments.  I wholeheartedly agree with your first paragraph, Zaxem.  Supertigerman, there is no place for incivil comments, on a discussion page or anywhere else, and I would appreciate your honoring of this principle.  Finally, my understanding of Wikipedia policy is that posts provided by the sockpuppet of a permanently blocked user must be deleted.  Best wishes!  edited by  +++$+++ :Thanks very much for seeking my opinion about this.  I've added something to my own discussion page about this and don't want to clutter Supertigerman's page with a "copy and paste" of those comments.  I wholeheartedly agree with your first paragraph, Zaxem.  Supertigerman, there is no place for incivil comments, on a discussion page or anywhere else, and I would appreciate your honoring of this principle.  Finally, my understanding of Wikipedia policy is that posts provided by the sockpuppet of a permanently blocked user must be deleted.  Best wishes!  edited by [[User:Tennis expert|Tennis expert]] 03:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
281935 +++$+++ emerson7 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281933 +++$+++ 281933 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 01:16:00 +++$+++ 1.173172560E09 +++$+++ that is correct....cheers! -- +++$+++ :that is correct....cheers! --[[User:emerson7|emerson7]] | [[User talk:emerson7|Talk]] 01:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

472027 +++$+++ MBisanz +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 472027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-21 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.200913740E09 +++$+++ You mentioned on AN\/I that you can set up a visual gallery and scan the images that way.  How would I do that for [[User:East718\/DFUI\/Logos]]?  ''' +++$+++ You mentioned on AN/I that you can set up a visual gallery and scan the images that way.  How would I do that for [[User:East718/DFUI/Logos]]?  '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 03:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
472028 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 472027 +++$+++ 472027 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.200914340E09 +++$+++ Hit edit. Copy the list into a text editor. Remove the <nowiki>\"*[[:\" and \"]]\"<\/nowiki> bits. Paste into a suitable page. My page is [[User talk:Carcharoth\/Image clean-up galleries]] (feel free to copy the layout). Put nowiki and gallery tags around the list, and save. Do this for as many lists as you want - they will all be safely saved in the page history. When you want to view one of the lists, go to the page history and click the version you labelled with a helpful edit summary identifying it, and then click \"edit\". Remove the \"nowiki\" tags and hit '''preview''' (not save). This will bring up a gallery of the images. Keep the lists small (my largest are usually about 400), as I'm not sure what effect this has on the image server - they are only thumbnails, but better safe than sorry - might even be better to limit it to 200 (the number on a category page). Once the preview screen has finished loading, scan it and select the images you want to work on (I open each one in a new tab). Have a few rationales and image templates handy in another tab or window. Away you go! :-) PS. While doing my scanning, I've spotted some of your image work - good stuff! PPS. The reason for all this bother, and the reason why NOGALLERY is turned on in most of the non-free image deletion categories (apart from the replaceable images ones), is to avoid non-free galleries. My method here even avoid the galleries being present in the page history.  +++$+++ :Hit edit. Copy the list into a text editor. Remove the <nowiki>"*[[:" and "]]"</nowiki> bits. Paste into a suitable page. My page is [[User talk:Carcharoth/Image clean-up galleries]] (feel free to copy the layout). Put nowiki and gallery tags around the list, and save. Do this for as many lists as you want - they will all be safely saved in the page history. When you want to view one of the lists, go to the page history and click the version you labelled with a helpful edit summary identifying it, and then click "edit". Remove the "nowiki" tags and hit '''preview''' (not save). This will bring up a gallery of the images. Keep the lists small (my largest are usually about 400), as I'm not sure what effect this has on the image server - they are only thumbnails, but better safe than sorry - might even be better to limit it to 200 (the number on a category page). Once the preview screen has finished loading, scan it and select the images you want to work on (I open each one in a new tab). Have a few rationales and image templates handy in another tab or window. Away you go! :-) PS. While doing my scanning, I've spotted some of your image work - good stuff! PPS. The reason for all this bother, and the reason why NOGALLERY is turned on in most of the non-free image deletion categories (apart from the replaceable images ones), is to avoid non-free galleries. My method here even avoid the galleries being present in the page history. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth#top|talk]]) 03:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
472029 +++$+++ MBisanz +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 472027 +++$+++ 472028 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.200919080E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:MBisanz\/Logos&oldid=185786766] this is not nearly as sexy as your layout, but it works for my needs.  Thanks for the tips. ''' +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:MBisanz/Logos&oldid=185786766] this is not nearly as sexy as your layout, but it works for my needs.  Thanks for the tips. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 04:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
472030 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 472027 +++$+++ 472029 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.200920040E09 +++$+++ And a final tip. Viewing the underlying source at [[Special:Contributions\/ImageRemovalBot]] within the right timeframe, usually allows you to track down which articles a deleted image was in. That way, if it turns out that an image can be fixed (eg. adding a rationale), then it is possible to put it back in the articles it was in. You do need to be sure that the image is 100% acceptable though.  +++$+++ :::And a final tip. Viewing the underlying source at [[Special:Contributions/ImageRemovalBot]] within the right timeframe, usually allows you to track down which articles a deleted image was in. That way, if it turns out that an image can be fixed (eg. adding a rationale), then it is possible to put it back in the articles it was in. You do need to be sure that the image is 100% acceptable though. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth#top|talk]]) 04:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

19791 +++$+++ Gampe +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19791 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-09 10:17:00 +++$+++ 1.299694620E09 +++$+++ [[Vlastimil Bubn\xedk]] made an [http:\/\/www.hc-kometa.cz\/clanek.asp?id=Rusy-jsme-ucili-hrat-hokejvzpomina-Vlastimil-Bubnik-1826 interview] on 2008-11-28, so he can't died in 2002. -- +++$+++ [[Vlastimil Bubník]] made an [http://www.hc-kometa.cz/clanek.asp?id=Rusy-jsme-ucili-hrat-hokejvzpomina-Vlastimil-Bubnik-1826 interview] on 2008-11-28, so he can't died in 2002. --[[User:Gampe|Gampe]] ([[User talk:Gampe|talk]]) 10:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
19792 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19791 +++$+++ 19791 +++$+++ 2011-03-09 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.299695400E09 +++$+++ Why are you telling me this? I did class him in the category \"Living people\". You don't have to take my word for it, however: just check out that article's edit history. The one who classed him among \"2002 deaths\" was Sole Soul, so you should contact him instead of me.  +++$+++ :Why are you telling me this? I did class him in the category "Living people". You don't have to take my word for it, however: just check out that article's edit history. The one who classed him among "2002 deaths" was Sole Soul, so you should contact him instead of me. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 10:30, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

19794 +++$+++ Yworo +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-25 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.301090400E09 +++$+++ You seem to be ignoring the fact that many of the articles on which you are changing categories have their categories sorted in alpha order. Please maintain this when changing them so other editors don't have to clean up after you.  +++$+++ You seem to be ignoring the fact that many of the articles on which you are changing categories have their categories sorted in alpha order. Please maintain this when changing them so other editors don't have to clean up after you. [[User:Yworo|Yworo]] ([[User talk:Yworo|talk]]) 15:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
19795 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19794 +++$+++ 19794 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.301118660E09 +++$+++ Alphabetical order? There is no such rule. Merely a practice followed by some editors. Most editors don't use it. \"Year of birth - Year of death - Place of birth - The rest of the categories\" is much more common as a categorizing practice.  +++$+++ :Alphabetical order? There is no such rule. Merely a practice followed by some editors. Most editors don't use it. "Year of birth - Year of death - Place of birth - The rest of the categories" is much more common as a categorizing practice. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 22:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
19796 +++$+++ Jrcla2 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19794 +++$+++ 19795 +++$+++ 2011-03-27 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.301266620E09 +++$+++ Disagree, I noticed this as well. It's more common to sort by alpha order and it keeps articles tidier. At least please consider this request when adding future categories, thank you.  +++$+++ ::Disagree, I noticed this as well. It's more common to sort by alpha order and it keeps articles tidier. At least please consider this request when adding future categories, thank you. [[User:Jrcla2|Jrcla2]] ([[User talk:Jrcla2|talk]]) 15:57, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

281942 +++$+++ Crunch +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.176750300E09 +++$+++ See [[Morgan Pressel]]. The claim is that the box is non-standard. This same user is deleting the photos we've been using from LPGA.com on the grounds that they are not non-replacable. We've been using these for a couple of years and I think they are provided by the LPGA for promotional purposes, so I'm not sure if this is justified.  +++$+++ See [[Morgan Pressel]]. The claim is that the box is non-standard. This same user is deleting the photos we've been using from LPGA.com on the grounds that they are not non-replacable. We've been using these for a couple of years and I think they are provided by the LPGA for promotional purposes, so I'm not sure if this is justified. [[User:Crunch|Crunch]] 12:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
281943 +++$+++ CharlotteWebb +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281942 +++$+++ 281942 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.176776520E09 +++$+++ \u2014  +++$+++ :— [[User talk:CharlotteWebb|CharlotteWebb]] 19:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
281944 +++$+++ Crunch +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281942 +++$+++ 281942 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.176785880E09 +++$+++ CharlotteWebb, First, please do not use Supertigerman's page to carry on a discussion with me. With regard to the Pressel image, we will add the appropriate rationale, with is that it is promo image provided by the LPGA.  +++$+++ :CharlotteWebb, First, please do not use Supertigerman's page to carry on a discussion with me. With regard to the Pressel image, we will add the appropriate rationale, with is that it is promo image provided by the LPGA. [[User:Crunch|Crunch]] 21:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

19799 +++$+++ Namiba +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19799 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-04 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.307219460E09 +++$+++ Do not add uncited ethnicity categories, living or dead, as you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Carlos_Alberto_Brenes&action=historysubmit&diff=432514726&oldid=415180120 here]. I will bring this to ANI. You have been asked twice to stop.-- +++$+++ Do not add uncited ethnicity categories, living or dead, as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carlos_Alberto_Brenes&action=historysubmit&diff=432514726&oldid=415180120 here]. I will bring this to ANI. You have been asked twice to stop.--[[User:Namiba|TM]] 13:31, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
19800 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19799 +++$+++ 19799 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.307220060E09 +++$+++ Even when it's obvious, such as Brenes being of Spanish descent? Brenes was a member of the Nicaraguan upper class, which is overwhelmingly of Spanish descent. Moreover, Brenes is a distinctively Spanish surname, found mainly in Andalusia. The case is obvious. You're overreacting.  +++$+++ :Even when it's obvious, such as Brenes being of Spanish descent? Brenes was a member of the Nicaraguan upper class, which is overwhelmingly of Spanish descent. Moreover, Brenes is a distinctively Spanish surname, found mainly in Andalusia. The case is obvious. You're overreacting. [[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 13:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
19801 +++$+++ Namiba +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19799 +++$+++ 19800 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.307222700E09 +++$+++ Actually, you are editing poorly. If you continue, I will take it to ANI.-- +++$+++ ::Actually, you are editing poorly. If you continue, I will take it to ANI.--[[User:Namiba|TM]] 14:25, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
19802 +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ Monegasque +++$+++ 19799 +++$+++ 19801 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.307223120E09 +++$+++ You are, of course, entitled to your own opinion. As are we all... +++$+++ :::You are, of course, entitled to your own opinion. As are we all...[[User:Monegasque|Monegasque]] ([[User talk:Monegasque#top|talk]]) 14:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

544088 +++$+++ David D. +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544088 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-11 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.181600040E09 +++$+++ One problem with the new format is when you try and print an article.  +++$+++ One problem with the new format is when you try and print an article. [[User:David D.|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.|(Talk)]] 15:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
544089 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544088 +++$+++ 544088 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.181600100E09 +++$+++ What does it do on printable?  (If it doesn't print well, I don't like it, because I always read the print version.)   +++$+++ :What does it do on printable?  (If it doesn't print well, I don't like it, because I always read the print version.)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
544090 +++$+++ David D. +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544088 +++$+++ 544089 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.181600220E09 +++$+++ You can't see all the references, just thos in the window.  +++$+++ ::You can't see all the references, just thos in the window. [[User:David D.|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.|(Talk)]] 15:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
544091 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544088 +++$+++ 544090 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.181600340E09 +++$+++ ugh ... although Wiki isn't a print encyclopedia, I always read FACs in printable form.   +++$+++ ::: ugh ... although Wiki isn't a print encyclopedia, I always read FACs in printable form.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
544092 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544088 +++$+++ 544089 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.181600640E09 +++$+++ Why on earth would people choose to read a hyperlinked web encyclopedia as a printout? I'm not sure if we need cater to such a strange behavior. :)  +++$+++ ::Why on earth would people choose to read a hyperlinked web encyclopedia as a printout? I'm not sure if we need cater to such a strange behavior. :) [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 15:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
544093 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544088 +++$+++ 544092 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.181600880E09 +++$+++ Has something to do with those darn airplanes that don't have internet access :-)   +++$+++ :::Has something to do with those darn airplanes that don't have internet access :-)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:28, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
544094 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544088 +++$+++ 544093 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.181601360E09 +++$+++ I must say I don't like this much either... Sorry, Tim! I very, very rarely print articles, but I do find this hard to follow on-screen as well. Besides, if it's not meant for printing, who cares how long the page is? :)  +++$+++ ::::I must say I don't like this much either... Sorry, Tim! I very, very rarely print articles, but I do find this hard to follow on-screen as well. Besides, if it's not meant for printing, who cares how long the page is? :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]Â·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 15:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
544095 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544088 +++$+++ 544092 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.181601600E09 +++$+++ The hyperlinking still works, so for a reader wanting a reference, it's a larger font and less screen clutter. I think this is an improvement for our general readership, even if it makes proofreading references a bit harder for us.  +++$+++ :::The hyperlinking still works, so for a reader wanting a reference, it's a larger font and less screen clutter. I think this is an improvement for our general readership, even if it makes proofreading references a bit harder for us. [[User:TimVickers|TimVickers]] 15:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

611692 +++$+++ Kyo cat +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611692 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-22 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.164268200E09 +++$+++ --<font face=\"Papyrus\">'''[[User:Kyo cat\/Esperanza|<span style=\"color:#0c0\">K<\/span>]] +++$+++ --<font face="Papyrus">'''[[User:Kyo cat/Esperanza|<span style="color:#0c0">K</span>]][[User:Kyo cat|<span style="color:#f90">yo cat</span>]]'''</font><sup>[[User talk:Kyo cat|meow!]]</sup> 23:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
611693 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611692 +++$+++ 611692 +++$+++ 2006-11-22 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.164268560E09 +++$+++ No, sadly I wasn't. It was something that never really caught my interest. Anyway, the userbox looks great! I'm sure that even though the Barnstar Brigade was deleted, you're still dedicated to it! Keep up the good work! And thanks for the comment about the titles of the pages. It took a while to get the color scheme on my user page just right ;) \/\/  +++$+++ :No, sadly I wasn't. It was something that never really caught my interest. Anyway, the userbox looks great! I'm sure that even though the Barnstar Brigade was deleted, you're still dedicated to it! Keep up the good work! And thanks for the comment about the titles of the pages. It took a while to get the color scheme on my user page just right ;) // [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuke'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sasuke-kun27|<font color="purple">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 23:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

559318 +++$+++ Drowne +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ 559318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-15 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.147738500E09 +++$+++ &mdash; +++$+++ &mdash;[[User:Drowne|Drowne]] | [[User talk:Drowne|Talk]] 17:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
559319 +++$+++ Drowne +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ 559318 +++$+++ 559318 +++$+++ 2006-05-16 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.147834500E09 +++$+++ Cool. You should have created [[Flora and fauna of Puerto Rico]] since it is normal to do so and you seem to know about that subject. =) &mdash; +++$+++ : Cool. You should have created [[Flora and fauna of Puerto Rico]] since it is normal to do so and you seem to know about that subject. =) &mdash;[[User:Drowne|Drowne]] | [[User talk:Drowne|Talk]] 19:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

544097 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-12 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.181692320E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] truly deserves this '''Barnstar of Bravery''' for his undaunted zeal in bringing [[Evolution]] back to [[WP:FA|Featured Article status]].  His steadfast devotion to the article and his calm, professional interactions with other Wikipedians of differing viewpoints are reminiscent of a [[Daniel]] come to judgment \xe2\u20ac\u201d in the lion's den.  Truly, angels rush in where fools fear to tread.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] truly deserves this '''Barnstar of Bravery''' for his undaunted zeal in bringing [[Evolution]] back to [[WP:FA|Featured Article status]].  His steadfast devotion to the article and his calm, professional interactions with other Wikipedians of differing viewpoints are reminiscent of a [[Daniel]] come to judgment â€” in the lion's den.  Truly, angels rush in where fools fear to tread. [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 16:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
544098 +++$+++ Aaron Bowen +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544097 +++$+++ 544097 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 05:25:00 +++$+++ 1.181910300E09 +++$+++ I wanted to congratulate you as well\xe2\u20ac\u201dI saw all the hard work you put into that article and we're lucky to have you here.  +++$+++ :I wanted to congratulate you as wellâ€”I saw all the hard work you put into that article and we're lucky to have you here. [[User:Aaron Bowen|Aaron Bowen]] 05:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

281955 +++$+++ Kintup +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-10 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.184115780E09 +++$+++ Please help with translation of [[commons:\u0aae\u0ac1\u0a96\u0aaa\u0ac3\u0ab7\u0acd\u0aa0]]. ~  +++$+++ Please help with translation of [[commons:મુખપૃષ્ઠ]]. ~ [[User:Kintup|kintup]] 18:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
281956 +++$+++ Kintup +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281955 +++$+++ 281955 +++$+++ 2007-07-10 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.184116020E09 +++$+++ Oops. I'm already ask you. =) But nothing happens from last time. ~  +++$+++ : Oops. I'm already ask you. =) But nothing happens from last time. ~ [[User:Kintup|kintup]] 18:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

544104 +++$+++ Gnixon +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-17 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.182119040E09 +++$+++ Sincerely,  +++$+++ Sincerely, [[User:Gnixon|Gnixon]] 15:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
544105 +++$+++ Gnixon +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544104 +++$+++ 544104 +++$+++ 2007-06-17 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.182121620E09 +++$+++ Thank you.   +++$+++ :Thank you.  [[User:Gnixon|Gnixon]] 16:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

262531 +++$+++ Ikkyu2 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-13 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.139824320E09 +++$+++ Wonder if you wouldn't mind having a look at the content which I am trying to contribute to [[IAHP]], and which above user keeps removing.  A second point of view on the talk page will be handy when I take this to RfC.  +++$+++ Wonder if you wouldn't mind having a look at the content which I am trying to contribute to [[IAHP]], and which above user keeps removing.  A second point of view on the talk page will be handy when I take this to RfC. [[User:Ikkyu2|Ikkyu2]] 01:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
262532 +++$+++ Ikkyu2 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262531 +++$+++ 262531 +++$+++ 2006-02-13 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.139902620E09 +++$+++ I liked the duck picture.  In general, quackery is something that bothers me, because of the terrible way that it can create false hopes and unreasonable expectations and then use these strong feelings to extort cash from vulnerable people.   I don't particularly like the word 'quack', but the WP article at 'quackery' is a pretty good discussion of the overall phenomenon.   +++$+++ :I liked the duck picture.  In general, quackery is something that bothers me, because of the terrible way that it can create false hopes and unreasonable expectations and then use these strong feelings to extort cash from vulnerable people.   I don't particularly like the word 'quack', but the WP article at 'quackery' is a pretty good discussion of the overall phenomenon.  [[User:Ikkyu2|Ikkyu2]] 23:37, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

544110 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544110 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-22 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.182548400E09 +++$+++ Hey Tim. You're probably busy with [[antioxidant]] (what with it being on the Main Page today and all :), but, when you get a chance, could you weigh in on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Immune_system&diff=139846586&oldid=139362569 this new section]? It might be more appropriate for the [[3,3'-Diindolylmethane]] page, and there might be a tiny conflict of interest here. Best,  +++$+++ Hey Tim. You're probably busy with [[antioxidant]] (what with it being on the Main Page today and all :), but, when you get a chance, could you weigh in on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immune_system&diff=139846586&oldid=139362569 this new section]? It might be more appropriate for the [[3,3'-Diindolylmethane]] page, and there might be a tiny conflict of interest here. Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 14:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
544111 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544110 +++$+++ 544110 +++$+++ 2007-06-22 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.182554940E09 +++$+++ Smells fishy to me, too. The effect of foods on the immune system is already mentioned in the \"Physiological regulation\" section: \"Diet may affect the immune system; for example, fresh fruits, vegetables, and foods rich in certain fatty acids may foster a healthy immune system.\" This seems reasonable for an overview article. The fact is that ''many'' chemicals in foods can affect the immune system, inclusion of such detail places undue weight on Diindolylmethane, IMO. Also it read a bit like a sales pitch, the inclusion of a commercial link doesn't help either.-- +++$+++ :Smells fishy to me, too. The effect of foods on the immune system is already mentioned in the "Physiological regulation" section: "Diet may affect the immune system; for example, fresh fruits, vegetables, and foods rich in certain fatty acids may foster a healthy immune system." This seems reasonable for an overview article. The fact is that ''many'' chemicals in foods can affect the immune system, inclusion of such detail places undue weight on Diindolylmethane, IMO. Also it read a bit like a sales pitch, the inclusion of a commercial link doesn't help either.--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 16:29, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

614973 +++$+++ Royalguard11 +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 614973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-25 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.164515160E09 +++$+++ Hello, you used the {{tl|helpme}} tag. How may I help you? When you've asked your question, please put the tag back so we know to check back. Alternatively, you can join the Wikipedia Bootcamp [[Wikipedia:IRC channels|IRC channel]] to get real-time help. (Use the [http:\/\/tools.wikimedia.de\/~bjelleklang\/pjirc\/ web-based client] to get instant access.) -[[User:Royalguard11|Royalguard11]]<small>([[User talk:Royalguard11|Talk]]\xb7[[User talk:Royalguard11\/Desk|Desk]]\xb7 +++$+++ Hello, you used the {{tl|helpme}} tag. How may I help you? When you've asked your question, please put the tag back so we know to check back. Alternatively, you can join the Wikipedia Bootcamp [[Wikipedia:IRC channels|IRC channel]] to get real-time help. (Use the [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~bjelleklang/pjirc/ web-based client] to get instant access.) -[[User:Royalguard11|Royalguard11]]<small>([[User talk:Royalguard11|Talk]]·[[User talk:Royalguard11/Desk|Desk]]·[[User:Royalguard11/ER|Review Me!]])</small> 20:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
614974 +++$+++ RHaworth +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 614973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-03 08:25:00 +++$+++ 1.165163100E09 +++$+++ The above advice was wrong: your sandbox should be called [[User:Mohammad adil\/sandbox]]. I have moved it there. --  +++$+++ :: The above advice was wrong: your sandbox should be called [[User:Mohammad adil/sandbox]]. I have moved it there. -- [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] 08:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
614975 +++$+++ Nwwaew +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 614973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.166924220E09 +++$+++ Regarding that question, please see [[Wikipedia:Infoboxes]] for details. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask me! Also, please sign your posts on talk pages and discussions using <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki> so that we can see who submitted what.  +++$+++ ::Regarding that question, please see [[Wikipedia:Infoboxes]] for details. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask me! Also, please sign your posts on talk pages and discussions using <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> so that we can see who submitted what. [[User:Nwwaew|Nwwaew]]<small> ([[User_Talk:Nwwaew|Talk Page]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Nwwaew|Contribs]]) ([[Special:Emailuser/Nwwaew|E-mail me]])</small> 17:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
614976 +++$+++ Seadog.M.S +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 614973 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.166924340E09 +++$+++ I am thinking you mean userbox, what you do is type <nowiki>{{Userbox|lightblue|lavender|Hi|This user says hi.}}<\/nowiki> which will produce {{Userbox|lightblue|lavender|Hi|This user says hi.}}. And all you do is replace the fields with what colors and wording you would like it to say. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::I am thinking you mean userbox, what you do is type <nowiki>{{Userbox|lightblue|lavender|Hi|This user says hi.}}</nowiki> which will produce {{Userbox|lightblue|lavender|Hi|This user says hi.}}. And all you do is replace the fields with what colors and wording you would like it to say. &mdash; [[User:Seadog.M.S|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#4169E1">'''Seadog_MS'''</span>]] 17:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

544112 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-17 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.182133080E09 +++$+++ In case you're wondering, I got your name from the GA reviewer's list. Thanks in advance,  +++$+++ In case you're wondering, I got your name from the GA reviewer's list. Thanks in advance, [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] 19:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
544113 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544112 +++$+++ 544112 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.182903720E09 +++$+++ Hi, just to inform you that I have since put up snake scales as a GA candidate. Thanks, +++$+++ :Hi, just to inform you that I have since put up snake scales as a GA candidate. Thanks,[[User:AshLin|AshLin]] 17:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
544114 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544112 +++$+++ 544113 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.182855600E09 +++$+++ All these diagrams are free to use through the GFDL licence.  +++$+++ ::All these diagrams are free to use through the GFDL licence. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 04:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

281970 +++$+++ 76.10.24.245 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-06 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.186461960E09 +++$+++ How is it known that the WGC events are getting 76 points? Do you have a reference? For example, T. Woods got only 70 points for winning last year's AmEx. That's why I reverted it; although the WGCs always get a high score, there is (to my understanding) some range for the winner's point total.  +++$+++ How is it known that the WGC events are getting 76 points? Do you have a reference? For example, T. Woods got only 70 points for winning last year's AmEx. That's why I reverted it; although the WGCs always get a high score, there is (to my understanding) some range for the winner's point total. [[User:76.10.24.245|76.10.24.245]] 21:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
281971 +++$+++ 76.10.24.245 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281970 +++$+++ 281970 +++$+++ 2007-08-08 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.186559940E09 +++$+++ A year or two ago, Osomec (who you may have noticed editing golf) said something substantially similar, but he ended up being wrong. I know of no policy that has assigned the WGCs 76 points.  +++$+++ :A year or two ago, Osomec (who you may have noticed editing golf) said something substantially similar, but he ended up being wrong. I know of no policy that has assigned the WGCs 76 points. [[User:76.10.24.245|76.10.24.245]] 00:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
281972 +++$+++ 76.10.24.245 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281970 +++$+++ 281971 +++$+++ 2007-08-08 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.186566900E09 +++$+++ Fail to see how tone has been argumentative. Have never been one to use smilies or exclamation points. Would be happy to concede point if 76-points-for-WGC-events is a policy reform I missed (a possibility, since all 3 were for 76 this year). Highly skeptical of inductive reasoning generally (see article on topic for extensive referencing for this proposition). Query, while I have your attention: why does Woods article (which you heavily edit) style him as the \"PGA Tour Money Winner\" for several years? Nobody would question he was a money-winner those years, but many other people were too. Perhaps other wordings are awkward, which is why I would say a reference to the Arnold Palmer Award (or is it Trophy?) works best. A similar distinction may be valuable for the PGA of America Player of the Year and Jack Nicklaus Trophy (or is it Award?), which are not the same. Would also draw attention to these awards, which are underappreciated honors for game's past legends.  +++$+++ ::Fail to see how tone has been argumentative. Have never been one to use smilies or exclamation points. Would be happy to concede point if 76-points-for-WGC-events is a policy reform I missed (a possibility, since all 3 were for 76 this year). Highly skeptical of inductive reasoning generally (see article on topic for extensive referencing for this proposition). Query, while I have your attention: why does Woods article (which you heavily edit) style him as the "PGA Tour Money Winner" for several years? Nobody would question he was a money-winner those years, but many other people were too. Perhaps other wordings are awkward, which is why I would say a reference to the Arnold Palmer Award (or is it Trophy?) works best. A similar distinction may be valuable for the PGA of America Player of the Year and Jack Nicklaus Trophy (or is it Award?), which are not the same. Would also draw attention to these awards, which are underappreciated honors for game's past legends. [[User:76.10.24.245|76.10.24.245]] 02:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

544117 +++$+++ BirgitteSB +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544117 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-26 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.182905640E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you are putting some efforts into WP policy areas.  I wanted to recommend an interesting [[Wikipedia:Practical process|essay]] to you.  I have had a hand in trying to make [[s:WS:WWI|some]] of the [[s:WS:COPY|polices]] at Wikisource conform to the better ideas in that essay, but have always found policy editing here too frustrating to be worth my effort for very long.  I hope you find it more rewarding than I did.--<i><font color=\"#9966FF\"> +++$+++ I noticed that you are putting some efforts into WP policy areas.  I wanted to recommend an interesting [[Wikipedia:Practical process|essay]] to you.  I have had a hand in trying to make [[s:WS:WWI|some]] of the [[s:WS:COPY|polices]] at Wikisource conform to the better ideas in that essay, but have always found policy editing here too frustrating to be worth my effort for very long.  I hope you find it more rewarding than I did.--<i><font color="#9966FF">[[User:BirgitteSB|Birgitte]]</font><font color="#CC99CC" size="2">SB</font></i> 17:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
544118 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544117 +++$+++ 544117 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.182906060E09 +++$+++ Ditto that !!!!  It still troubles me that RS has been ''de facto'' deprecated (not sure there was consensus for that, but whatever), and I learned the hard way to stay away from policy discussions to the extent possible.   +++$+++ :Ditto that !!!!  It still troubles me that RS has been ''de facto'' deprecated (not sure there was consensus for that, but whatever), and I learned the hard way to stay away from policy discussions to the extent possible.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

544120 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544120 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-27 08:35:00 +++$+++ 1.182958500E09 +++$+++ Given the recent event with [[Chris Benoit]] a professional wrestler who slayed his family and supposedly had steroids in his home at the time, numerous people have been attempting to alter the [[Anabolic steroid]] article to remove any implication that steroids don't result in \"roid rage\". I wanted to ask if you could keep an eye on it and revert any major changes to it before they get adequate discussion in the talk page by all involved parties. Thanks.  +++$+++ Given the recent event with [[Chris Benoit]] a professional wrestler who slayed his family and supposedly had steroids in his home at the time, numerous people have been attempting to alter the [[Anabolic steroid]] article to remove any implication that steroids don't result in "roid rage". I wanted to ask if you could keep an eye on it and revert any major changes to it before they get adequate discussion in the talk page by all involved parties. Thanks. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 08:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
544121 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544120 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-27 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.183011540E09 +++$+++ As expected a few people are attempting to get the [[Anabolic steroid]] article delisted from being a Good article because it doesn't conform to what the popular media says about anabolic steroids. You yourself passed it's nomination for being a Good article and it has done nothing but improve since then and is now at the criteria for a featured article. Nonetheless some people seem to want it delisted, So could you add some input? Here [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Good_article_review#Anabolic_steroid]].   +++$+++ ::As expected a few people are attempting to get the [[Anabolic steroid]] article delisted from being a Good article because it doesn't conform to what the popular media says about anabolic steroids. You yourself passed it's nomination for being a Good article and it has done nothing but improve since then and is now at the criteria for a featured article. Nonetheless some people seem to want it delisted, So could you add some input? Here [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_review#Anabolic_steroid]].  [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 23:19, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

544122 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544122 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-27 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.183003380E09 +++$+++ Your edit aren't clarifying things &mdash; they're either making no difference, or they're introducing problems &mdash; and most of the people who agree with you are people who themselves don't understand the policies (one or two of whom have caused real trouble around them in the past). As an experiment, try inserting the most appalling writing you can force yourself to come up with; you'll find that most of the same people will still support you.  +++$+++ Your edit aren't clarifying things &mdash; they're either making no difference, or they're introducing problems &mdash; and most of the people who agree with you are people who themselves don't understand the policies (one or two of whom have caused real trouble around them in the past). As an experiment, try inserting the most appalling writing you can force yourself to come up with; you'll find that most of the same people will still support you. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 21:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
544123 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544122 +++$+++ 544122 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.183078860E09 +++$+++ I received an e-mail about you from an editor I respect, who spoke highly of your work elsewhere. I'm certainly willing to work with you, but please imagine how you'd feel if I turned up at [[Evolution]] (which I was told you've done a lot of work on), and started crashing around with my own ideas and reverting you, even though I knew nothing about it.  +++$+++ :I received an e-mail about you from an editor I respect, who spoke highly of your work elsewhere. I'm certainly willing to work with you, but please imagine how you'd feel if I turned up at [[Evolution]] (which I was told you've done a lot of work on), and started crashing around with my own ideas and reverting you, even though I knew nothing about it. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 18:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

281979 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-13 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.186988400E09 +++$+++ <\/nowiki> Does that help? If not, lmk and we'll work on it together. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ </nowiki> Does that help? If not, lmk and we'll work on it together. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 00:00, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
281980 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281979 +++$+++ 281979 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.186989480E09 +++$+++ Also, I can do the edit for you if you think that will help. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :Also, I can do the edit for you if you think that will help. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 00:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
281981 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281979 +++$+++ 281979 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.186989600E09 +++$+++ And one more thing - while you're at it, there should probably be some sort of [[WP:D]] for the \"US Open\" as there is a US Open in golf and in tennis. Just a thought. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :And one more thing - while you're at it, there should probably be some sort of [[WP:D]] for the "US Open" as there is a US Open in golf and in tennis. Just a thought. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 00:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
281982 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281979 +++$+++ 281981 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.187004960E09 +++$+++ Hey, I think it would be easier if you did the edit, since I can't figure it out. My goal is to make the following templates always appear collapsed: [[Template:The Masters champions]], [[Template:U.S. Open champions]], [[Template:The Open champions]], and [[Template:PGA Champions]]. I look forward to learning how it is done. Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Hey, I think it would be easier if you did the edit, since I can't figure it out. My goal is to make the following templates always appear collapsed: [[Template:The Masters champions]], [[Template:U.S. Open champions]], [[Template:The Open champions]], and [[Template:PGA Champions]]. I look forward to learning how it is done. Thanks! [[User:Supertigerman|Supertigerman]] 04:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
281983 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281979 +++$+++ 281982 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.187005560E09 +++$+++ Okay, cool..give me just a few. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::: Okay, cool..give me just a few. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 04:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
281984 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281979 +++$+++ 281983 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.187008980E09 +++$+++ does {{tl|The Masters champions}} solve the problem for you? I'm about to crash out, but just respond here and I'll chime in. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :::* does {{tl|The Masters champions}} solve the problem for you? I'm about to crash out, but just respond here and I'll chime in. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 05:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
281985 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281979 +++$+++ 281984 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.187009100E09 +++$+++ Looks good, except can the navbar not be white? it's hard to see. Also, i think the nowrap function helped its layout. thanks again, u da man!  +++$+++ ::::* Looks good, except can the navbar not be white? it's hard to see. Also, i think the nowrap function helped its layout. thanks again, u da man! [[User:Supertigerman|Supertigerman]] 05:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
281986 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281979 +++$+++ 281984 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.187009460E09 +++$+++ The new format *should* not require the nowrap, but just in case i'm missing something - is it causing you problems.  If you go to edit the template - you'll see the color (which is for the background color of the bar) and the fontcolor fields (for the color of the text that isn't wikilinked).  You can use whatever [[web colors]] you want there, but just keep in mind that there are some usability standards (i can dig them up) and some people might react to the color being changed (it's a HUGE debate on other sports templates for example).  Alright, I'm definitely out, but i'll be back to help later. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::::* The new format *should* not require the nowrap, but just in case i'm missing something - is it causing you problems.  If you go to edit the template - you'll see the color (which is for the background color of the bar) and the fontcolor fields (for the color of the text that isn't wikilinked).  You can use whatever [[web colors]] you want there, but just keep in mind that there are some usability standards (i can dig them up) and some people might react to the color being changed (it's a HUGE debate on other sports templates for example).  Alright, I'm definitely out, but i'll be back to help later. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 05:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

544124 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544124 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-28 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.183082640E09 +++$+++ 5) By a publisher, not in a source, because sources are sometimes people.  +++$+++ 5) By a publisher, not in a source, because sources are sometimes people. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 19:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
544125 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544124 +++$+++ 544124 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.183083360E09 +++$+++ I had already said most of that to you, Tim.  +++$+++ :I had already said most of that to you, Tim. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 19:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

19837 +++$+++ XavierHD +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-01 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.288679520E09 +++$+++ \xbfComo est\xe1s? Bueno, se que t\xfa eres bueno en esto, as\xed que ven\xeda a pedirte si por favor pod\xedas colocar las estad\xedsticas con las selecciones inferiores de Espa\xf1a para un art\xedculo que cree hace poco, [[Alejandro Fern\xe1ndez Iglesias]], o '''\xc1lex'''. Juega en el real madrid castilla y hasta donde s\xe9 ha jugado con todas las inferiores. Bueno eso es todo, cualquier cosa me avisas, saludos. <b><span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ ¿Como estás? Bueno, se que tú eres bueno en esto, así que venía a pedirte si por favor podías colocar las estadísticas con las selecciones inferiores de España para un artículo que cree hace poco, [[Alejandro Fernández Iglesias]], o '''Álex'''. Juega en el real madrid castilla y hasta donde sé ha jugado con todas las inferiores. Bueno eso es todo, cualquier cosa me avisas, saludos. <b><span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:XavierHD|<font color="maroon">–HD</font>]]</span></b> <small><sup>[[User talk:XavierHD|<font color="gray">Ask, comment, talk!</font>]]</sup></small> 23:32, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
19838 +++$+++ XavierHD +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19837 +++$+++ 19837 +++$+++ 2010-11-02 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.288750080E09 +++$+++ Gracias ;) <b><span style=\"text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ :Gracias ;) <b><span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:XavierHD|<font color="maroon">–HD</font>]]</span></b> <small><sup>[[User talk:XavierHD|<font color="gray">Ask, comment, talk!</font>]]</sup></small> 19:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

544126 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-28 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.183023660E09 +++$+++ The discussion of Anabolic steroids has brought to my attention the [[Testosterone]] article. Currently it contains only 6 references and 2 external links. Most of the material is unreferenced and the prose and flow of the article is in sad shape. Since you've contributed to that article in the past I thought you might want to re-write it and update it references included. It's a very important article in the Chemicals project however it's quality is bad. I've rated it a \"start\" class article. The article has a good amount of content, but it is still weak in certain areas and lacks adequate references. If you decide to attempt to re-write it let me know so that I can start making contributions. I think some of the sources from the Anabolic steroid article can be used in this one.  +++$+++ The discussion of Anabolic steroids has brought to my attention the [[Testosterone]] article. Currently it contains only 6 references and 2 external links. Most of the material is unreferenced and the prose and flow of the article is in sad shape. Since you've contributed to that article in the past I thought you might want to re-write it and update it references included. It's a very important article in the Chemicals project however it's quality is bad. I've rated it a "start" class article. The article has a good amount of content, but it is still weak in certain areas and lacks adequate references. If you decide to attempt to re-write it let me know so that I can start making contributions. I think some of the sources from the Anabolic steroid article can be used in this one. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 02:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
544127 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544126 +++$+++ 544126 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.183023720E09 +++$+++ Testosterone, great, a page with lots of text but little solid content. My least favorite!  +++$+++ :Testosterone, great, a page with lots of text but little solid content. My least favorite! [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 02:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
544128 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544126 +++$+++ 544127 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.183023840E09 +++$+++ I think it needs a major rewrite. I'd be willing to contribute some time to it if you decide to as well. It would take quite a while for me to do it alone. It's one of the key articles concerning chemistry and pharmacology and seems to be in terrible quality.  +++$+++ ::I think it needs a major rewrite. I'd be willing to contribute some time to it if you decide to as well. It would take quite a while for me to do it alone. It's one of the key articles concerning chemistry and pharmacology and seems to be in terrible quality. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 02:44, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

19839 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.289970720E09 +++$+++ Qu\xe9 todo vaya bien, un saludo - -- +++$+++ Qué todo vaya bien, un saludo - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 21:12, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
19840 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19839 +++$+++ 19839 +++$+++ 2010-11-23 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.290563280E09 +++$+++ Tambi\xe9n - y perdona por el malentendido y\/o mis maneras - en [[Francisco Jos\xe9 Borrego]], hay que poner un sumario aunque sea m\xednimo, para evitar estas situaciones. S\xed, ya s\xe9 que WWW.PLAYERHISTORY.COM solo \"sirve\" para utilizadores registrados, y no me gusta mucho el sitio en si. Saludos - -- +++$+++ *También - y perdona por el malentendido y/o mis maneras - en [[Francisco José Borrego]], hay que poner un sumario aunque sea mínimo, para evitar estas situaciones. Sí, ya sé que WWW.PLAYERHISTORY.COM solo "sirve" para utilizadores registrados, y no me gusta mucho el sitio en si. Saludos - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 17:48, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

19841 +++$+++ Raulseixas +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Raulseixas|Raulseixas]] ([[User talk:Raulseixas|talk]]) 1 December 2010 (UTC)
19842 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19841 +++$+++ 19841 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.291790220E09 +++$+++ Sobre este tema, quiz\xe1s deber\xedas hechar un vistazo a la discusi\xf3n que he iniciado en WP:FOOTY (ver aqu\xed http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Regular_season_.2F_Playoffs). Todav\xeda no hay consenso al respecto, y claro que tu opini\xf3n ser\xe1 muy bienvenida, si tienes problemas con el Ingl\xe9s, yo te hecho un cable. Saludos. - -- +++$+++ *Sobre este tema, quizás deberías hechar un vistazo a la discusión que he iniciado en WP:FOOTY (ver aquí http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Regular_season_.2F_Playoffs). Todavía no hay consenso al respecto, y claro que tu opinión será muy bienvenida, si tienes problemas con el Inglés, yo te hecho un cable. Saludos. - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 22:37, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

281987 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-13 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.187068020E09 +++$+++ Now there ya go! Good job on the no wrap.  Have you thought about creating one of these templates in your user space as a sandbox!  Really nice job.  Let me know if you want some more help or if you want to talk about any of this stuff! <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Now there ya go! Good job on the no wrap.  Have you thought about creating one of these templates in your user space as a sandbox!  Really nice job.  Let me know if you want some more help or if you want to talk about any of this stuff! <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 22:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
281988 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281987 +++$+++ 281987 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.187068680E09 +++$+++ Hug me brotha! Tiger Woods' templates look rather godly now, if i may say so myself. Oh, and why is it good to create the template in a sandbox again? I never really understood the point of a sandbox. :) +++$+++ :Hug me brotha! Tiger Woods' templates look rather godly now, if i may say so myself. Oh, and why is it good to create the template in a sandbox again? I never really understood the point of a sandbox. :)[[User:Supertigerman|Supertigerman]] 22:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
281989 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281987 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 22:24:00 +++$+++ 1.187069040E09 +++$+++ Haha, hang in there.  People love to template out pages, I personally thing it's ba-aaaad.  But whatever.  The purpose of sanboxing anything is that you can work on it until your hearts desire and you won't really be affecting anyone else.  You can \"workout\" all the issues you have and then open up the content to interested users.  I have done this many times and it's a great way to start things.  The only thing you need to be careful is with the category tags.  In a sandbox you should use (for example: <nowiki>[[:Category:Super cool people]]<\/nowiki>).  Once it's live you should use <nowiki>[[Category:Super cool people]]<\/nowiki>  This way, the category isn't inundated with pages that don't really belong.  Does that make sense?  Have you looked at [[Help:Template]] yet?  I'm not super great, but i'm doing pretty good with my template development.  There are a couple of guys who are super helpful and freakin awesome, I'll be glad to get them to help if there is something i can't answer for you. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::* Haha, hang in there.  People love to template out pages, I personally thing it's ba-aaaad.  But whatever.  The purpose of sanboxing anything is that you can work on it until your hearts desire and you won't really be affecting anyone else.  You can "workout" all the issues you have and then open up the content to interested users.  I have done this many times and it's a great way to start things.  The only thing you need to be careful is with the category tags.  In a sandbox you should use (for example: <nowiki>[[:Category:Super cool people]]</nowiki>).  Once it's live you should use <nowiki>[[Category:Super cool people]]</nowiki>  This way, the category isn't inundated with pages that don't really belong.  Does that make sense?  Have you looked at [[Help:Template]] yet?  I'm not super great, but i'm doing pretty good with my template development.  There are a couple of guys who are super helpful and freakin awesome, I'll be glad to get them to help if there is something i can't answer for you. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 22:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
281990 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281987 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.187080620E09 +++$+++ Bout to eat dinner, but i'll be back later... you can also look at nesting the content as well. That might work out as well. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :::* Bout to eat dinner, but i'll be back later... you can also look at nesting the content as well. That might work out as well. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 01:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
281991 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281987 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-15 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.187174640E09 +++$+++ How goes with everything? <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :::* How goes with everything? <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 03:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
281992 +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281987 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-16 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.187267340E09 +++$+++ Hey things look really good. Someone just updated the format and they look pretty sexy now. kinda like yourself.  +++$+++ ::::*Hey things look really good. Someone just updated the format and they look pretty sexy now. kinda like yourself. [[User:Supertigerman|Supertigerman]] 05:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
281993 +++$+++ Jmfangio +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281987 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-16 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.187268480E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm always struggling between which \"formats\" to use in stuff like that.  The navbox formula works too. :-) Let me know if there is anything you want help on. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::::*Yeah, I'm always struggling between which "formats" to use in stuff like that.  The navbox formula works too. :-) Let me know if there is anything you want help on. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Jmfangio|<b>Juan Miguel Fangio</b>]]|[[User_talk:Jmfangio|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;►Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 05:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

19845 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-08 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.291864440E09 +++$+++ Saludos. - -- +++$+++ Saludos. - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 19:14, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
19846 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19845 +++$+++ 19845 +++$+++ 2010-12-08 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.291873620E09 +++$+++ OK hombre, solo un malentendido, nada m\xe1s. Buen trabajo, pero ser\xeda de buen tono que hecharas un vistazo en la discusi\xf3n (tienes el enlace) y, si puedes, dar tu opini\xf3n. Saludos tambi\xe9n, tambi\xe9n haces un gran trabajo por aqu\xed ;) - -- +++$+++ *OK hombre, solo un malentendido, nada más. Buen trabajo, pero sería de buen tono que hecharas un vistazo en la discusión (tienes el enlace) y, si puedes, dar tu opinión. Saludos también, también haces un gran trabajo por aquí ;) - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 21:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

544134 +++$+++ Vanished user +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-30 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.183251600E09 +++$+++ That said, the \"Biochemical mechanisms\" section is either copy-pasted from a scientific article, or the person who wrote it cannot write for laymen at all.  +++$+++ That said, the "Biochemical mechanisms" section is either copy-pasted from a scientific article, or the person who wrote it cannot write for laymen at all. [[User:Vanished user|Vanished user]] <sup>[[User_talk:Vanished user|talk]]</sup> 18:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
544135 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544134 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-30 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.183251780E09 +++$+++ I wrote it, It's taken from numerous sources and may contain terms from those articles however that's not the same as a copyright. It's very difficult, I would say impossible, to write about the biochemical mechanisms of synthetic hormones in laymen. Most of the terms used have no laymen equivalent and can't be rephrased so your average scientifically illiterate person understands them.  +++$+++ :::I wrote it, It's taken from numerous sources and may contain terms from those articles however that's not the same as a copyright. It's very difficult, I would say impossible, to write about the biochemical mechanisms of synthetic hormones in laymen. Most of the terms used have no laymen equivalent and can't be rephrased so your average scientifically illiterate person understands them. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 18:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
544136 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544134 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-30 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.183252140E09 +++$+++ For instance, Tell me how \"promoting the commitment of mesenchymal pluripotent cells into myogenic lineage and inhibiting their differentiation into adipogenic lineage.\" can be rephrased into laymen. I don't see how it can be, which is why I had to copy the sentence directly from it's source due to being unable to convert it into laymen.  +++$+++ :::For instance, Tell me how "promoting the commitment of mesenchymal pluripotent cells into myogenic lineage and inhibiting their differentiation into adipogenic lineage." can be rephrased into laymen. I don't see how it can be, which is why I had to copy the sentence directly from it's source due to being unable to convert it into laymen. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 18:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
544137 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544134 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-30 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.183253220E09 +++$+++ I've dealt with that. Some of the detail is lost of course, but since most readers might have a chance of understanding the new wording, this is a simplification worth doing.  +++$+++ ::I've dealt with that. Some of the detail is lost of course, but since most readers might have a chance of understanding the new wording, this is a simplification worth doing. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 18:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

19847 +++$+++ J Mo 101 +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19847 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-22 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.293046200E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ Cheers, [[User:J Mo 101|J Mo 101]] ([[User talk:J Mo 101|talk]]) 11:30, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
19848 +++$+++ J Mo 101 +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19847 +++$+++ 19847 +++$+++ 2010-12-22 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.293048240E09 +++$+++ Cool. Do you also have the name of the book and the author you got that info from so I can reference the article? Thanks again,  +++$+++ :Cool. Do you also have the name of the book and the author you got that info from so I can reference the article? Thanks again, [[User:J Mo 101|J Mo 101]] ([[User talk:J Mo 101|talk]]) 12:04, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

19849 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19849 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-25 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.293341160E09 +++$+++ Otra vez, mis votos de paz, alegr\xeda y buen rollo, si tienes algunas sugestiones u cr\xedticas acerca de los cambios en M. de Andr\xe9s, no dudes en comunicarmelos. Saludos - -- +++$+++ Otra vez, mis votos de paz, alegría y buen rollo, si tienes algunas sugestiones u críticas acerca de los cambios en M. de Andrés, no dudes en comunicarmelos. Saludos - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 21:26, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
19850 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19849 +++$+++ 19849 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.293341760E09 +++$+++ Ha, sobre el dicho art\xedculo del ex-jugador del Athletic, he visto ahora que, aparentemente, ha sido creado por [[User:Sandman888]], y como lo ha hecho? Ha copiado de la p\xe1gina espa\xf1ola, con un ingl\xe9s risible, y ha hecho lo propio con muchos jugadores de dicho club ([[Bittor Alkiza]], [[Jos\xe9 Francisco Rojo]], [[Carlos Ruiz Herrero]] y otros que ahora no \"me llegan\"). Quando le he preguntado al respeto - despu\xe9s de \"limpiar\" los art\xedculos - me dicho que no sab\xeda de que le hablaba, muy educadamente por cierto, y he de creerle, aunque en la historia de edicciones de TODOS estos t\xedos, \xe9l es el PRIMERO en editar). En unas horas, entro \"al tajo\" ;) - -- +++$+++ *Ha, sobre el dicho artículo del ex-jugador del Athletic, he visto ahora que, aparentemente, ha sido creado por [[User:Sandman888]], y como lo ha hecho? Ha copiado de la página española, con un inglés risible, y ha hecho lo propio con muchos jugadores de dicho club ([[Bittor Alkiza]], [[José Francisco Rojo]], [[Carlos Ruiz Herrero]] y otros que ahora no "me llegan"). Quando le he preguntado al respeto - después de "limpiar" los artículos - me dicho que no sabía de que le hablaba, muy educadamente por cierto, y he de creerle, aunque en la historia de edicciones de TODOS estos tíos, él es el PRIMERO en editar). En unas horas, entro "al tajo" ;) - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 21:36, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
19851 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19849 +++$+++ 19849 +++$+++ 2010-12-26 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.293364980E09 +++$+++ Estaba equivocado (solo hab\xeda hechado un vistazo muy r\xe1pido), ha sido mucho peor de lo que esperaba, y si casi parece (casi) poetico en la Wiki espa\xf1ola (de ahi lo de Cervantes)...Dios m\xedo en la inglesa, me he quedado con los ojos ardiendo!! Espero que los cambios te gusten, saludos - -- +++$+++ *Estaba equivocado (solo había hechado un vistazo muy rápido), ha sido mucho peor de lo que esperaba, y si casi parece (casi) poetico en la Wiki española (de ahi lo de Cervantes)...Dios mío en la inglesa, me he quedado con los ojos ardiendo!! Espero que los cambios te gusten, saludos - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 04:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
19852 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19849 +++$+++ 19849 +++$+++ 2010-12-27 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.293499560E09 +++$+++ My proximo proyecto, [[Ismael Urtubi]], del mismo calibre que De Andr\xe9s, pero que le ocurre a este usuario?!? Saludos - -- +++$+++ *My proximo proyecto, [[Ismael Urtubi]], del mismo calibre que De Andrés, pero que le ocurre a este usuario?!? Saludos - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 17:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

281994 +++$+++ Savie Kumara +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-15 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.187161380E09 +++$+++ How many userboxes do you have?  There is a userbox that will tell the amount of userboxes on your page.  Just put <nowiki>{{User:UBX\/ubx num|put number here}}<\/nowiki> on your page, replacing \"put number here\" with the amount of userboxes.  I have one on my page, and I have 88 userboxes.  Hope I'll see it on your page!  +++$+++ How many userboxes do you have?  There is a userbox that will tell the amount of userboxes on your page.  Just put <nowiki>{{User:UBX/ubx num|put number here}}</nowiki> on your page, replacing "put number here" with the amount of userboxes.  I have one on my page, and I have 88 userboxes.  Hope I'll see it on your page! [[User:Savie Kumara|Savie Kumara]] 00:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
281995 +++$+++ Savie Kumara +++$+++ Supertigerman +++$+++ 281994 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.187662380E09 +++$+++ What's a facebook?  +++$+++ ::What's a facebook? [[User:Savie Kumara|Savie Kumara]] 19:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

571287 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-13 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.166022120E09 +++$+++ A level 17 city is great.  I love playing and building nothing but strelets (I love those little guys).  My favourite civ would be Britain though, is the lv17 city death match or supremacy? I have seen my email.  Good work.   '''[[User:culverin|<font color=\"darkblue\">Culv<\/font>]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ A level 17 city is great.  I love playing and building nothing but strelets (I love those little guys).  My favourite civ would be Britain though, is the lv17 city death match or supremacy? I have seen my email.  Good work.   '''[[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">Culv</font>]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">rin</font>]][[Special:Random|<font color="green">?</font>]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]''' </sup></small> 07:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
571288 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571287 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.166024160E09 +++$+++ My injurys are fine.  All I have at the current time is a broken leg.  Tomorrow I am getting it replastured with a proper cast which should be good.  Now only seven weeks of having to use crutches and not being able to swim, and slowly going insane. hahaha, ka?  '''[[User:culverin|<font color=\"darkblue\">Culv<\/font>]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::My injurys are fine.  All I have at the current time is a broken leg.  Tomorrow I am getting it replastured with a proper cast which should be good.  Now only seven weeks of having to use crutches and not being able to swim, and slowly going insane. hahaha, ka?  '''[[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">Culv</font>]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">rin</font>]][[Special:Random|<font color="green">?</font>]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]''' </sup></small> 07:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
571289 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571287 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.166103780E09 +++$+++ Revelations aye? Alright Whos getting the gender change? Anyway, I got my stylish new cast (Its blue!).  Dont you worry about my noggin let me worry about blank, the docter says that my cast might come off in another four weeks so thats great.  Well I am looking forward to the meeting.  I have a lv 15 city in AOE3. I fully pwned Spain. '''[[User:culverin|<font color=\"darkblue\">Culv<\/font>]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::Revelations aye? Alright Whos getting the gender change? Anyway, I got my stylish new cast (Its blue!).  Dont you worry about my noggin let me worry about blank, the docter says that my cast might come off in another four weeks so thats great.  Well I am looking forward to the meeting.  I have a lv 15 city in AOE3. I fully pwned Spain. '''[[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">Culv</font>]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">rin</font>]][[Special:Random|<font color="green">?</font>]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]''' </sup></small> 05:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
571290 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571287 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.166104800E09 +++$+++ It isnt a party without your \"special brew\".  '''[[User:culverin|<font color=\"darkblue\">Culv<\/font>]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::::It isnt a party without your "special brew".  '''[[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">Culv</font>]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">rin</font>]][[Special:Random|<font color="green">?</font>]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]''' </sup></small> 06:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

19855 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19855 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-02 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.294013040E09 +++$+++ Saludos y buen trabajo - -- +++$+++ Saludos y buen trabajo - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 16:04, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
19856 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19855 +++$+++ 19855 +++$+++ 2011-01-02 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.294036500E09 +++$+++ Que hay de cierto en los datos de [[Jonathan Viera]] con la seleci\xf3n (y antes ponia texto que yo he quitado, sobretodo por el CLUB CAREER, dios m\xedo!)? En la p\xe1gina de Wikipedia sobre la competici\xf3n, su nombre no sale en SQUADS, uno de los dos tiene que estar mal. Gracias de antemano y saludos. - -- +++$+++ *Que hay de cierto en los datos de [[Jonathan Viera]] con la seleción (y antes ponia texto que yo he quitado, sobretodo por el CLUB CAREER, dios mío!)? En la página de Wikipedia sobre la competición, su nombre no sale en SQUADS, uno de los dos tiene que estar mal. Gracias de antemano y saludos. - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 22:35, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

178072 +++$+++ Avraham +++$+++ Michael Glass +++$+++ 178072 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-13 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.171361220E09 +++$+++ This issue was discussed months ago. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Circumcision&diff=107717555&oldid=107708762 This edit] has no other ostensible bearing in the [[Circumcision]] article, other than to disparage Orthodox Jews. Please revert your NPOV comments. For the record please adhere to Wikipedia's [[WP:NPOV]] policy, otherwise the appropriate measures will be taken to protect the encuyclopedia. Thank you. --  +++$+++ This issue was discussed months ago. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&diff=107717555&oldid=107708762 This edit] has no other ostensible bearing in the [[Circumcision]] article, other than to disparage Orthodox Jews. Please revert your NPOV comments. For the record please adhere to Wikipedia's [[WP:NPOV]] policy, otherwise the appropriate measures will be taken to protect the encuyclopedia. Thank you. -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] 02:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
178073 +++$+++ Michael Glass +++$+++ Michael Glass +++$+++ 178072 +++$+++ 178072 +++$+++ 2007-02-13 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.171399080E09 +++$+++ Please read your comment again. The obvious typo suggests to me that you are reacting too emotionally to think clearly. Please calm down and reconsider your position.   +++$+++ :Please read your comment again. The obvious typo suggests to me that you are reacting too emotionally to think clearly. Please calm down and reconsider your position.  [[User:Michael Glass|Michael Glass]] 12:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

19858 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19858 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-28 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.296207480E09 +++$+++ Gracias de antemano, saludos - -- +++$+++ Gracias de antemano, saludos - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 01:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
19859 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19858 +++$+++ 19858 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.296263220E09 +++$+++ Tambi\xe9n, si puedes hecha un vistazo a [[Paco Clos]]: se que ahora es el entrenador del [[FC Santboi\xe0]], pero lo que no s\xe9 es si despu\xe9s del \xfaltimo club ha estado en otro equipo. Por favor corr\xedgelo si esta mal. De nuevo, gracias y saludos. - -- +++$+++ *También, si puedes hecha un vistazo a [[Paco Clos]]: se que ahora es el entrenador del [[FC Santboià]], pero lo que no sé es si después del último club ha estado en otro equipo. Por favor corrígelo si esta mal. De nuevo, gracias y saludos. - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 17:07, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
19860 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19858 +++$+++ 19858 +++$+++ 2011-01-29 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.296366480E09 +++$+++ Otra: parece raro (aunque puede que sea as\xed) que [[Miguel \xc1ngel Tena Garc\xeda]] haya empezado a jugar al f\xfatbol a los 21 a\xf1os. Sabes si ha jugado en algun otro equipo, aunque sea amateur? Gracias de nuevo. Ah, y no te preocupes de hablar en espa\xf1ol (he visto el mensaje que te han enviado), no estamos haciendo ningun crimen ;)) - -- +++$+++ *Otra: parece raro (aunque puede que sea así) que [[Miguel Ángel Tena García]] haya empezado a jugar al fútbol a los 21 años. Sabes si ha jugado en algun otro equipo, aunque sea amateur? Gracias de nuevo. Ah, y no te preocupes de hablar en español (he visto el mensaje que te han enviado), no estamos haciendo ningun crimen ;)) - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 21:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
19861 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19858 +++$+++ 19858 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.296475560E09 +++$+++ Gracias por tu ayuda en Tena, ya hemos mejorado el art\xedculo un poco m\xe1s ;) Otra de FUTBOLME.com, puedes arreglar el enlace en [[UD Almer\xeda B]]? Tienes que explicarme que estoy haciendo mal, para que no est\xe9 siempre \"molestando\". Saludos, buena semana - -- +++$+++ *Gracias por tu ayuda en Tena, ya hemos mejorado el artículo un poco más ;) Otra de FUTBOLME.com, puedes arreglar el enlace en [[UD Almería B]]? Tienes que explicarme que estoy haciendo mal, para que no esté siempre "molestando". Saludos, buena semana - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 04:06, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

544149 +++$+++ Krator +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-03 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.183524480E09 +++$+++ I often give comments on other's efforts at dispute resolution and discussion, and would love to do so on your editor review, as you requested at [[WT:3O]]. A few links to specific (long) discussions you wish me to look over would be great - wading through link after link, and your contributions page, is not very productive. -- +++$+++ I often give comments on other's efforts at dispute resolution and discussion, and would love to do so on your editor review, as you requested at [[WT:3O]]. A few links to specific (long) discussions you wish me to look over would be great - wading through link after link, and your contributions page, is not very productive. --[[User:Krator]] ([[User talk:Krator|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Krator|c]]) 21:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
544150 +++$+++ Krator +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544149 +++$+++ 544149 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.183530720E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I am writing now, but it is a long read, so be patient. -- +++$+++ :Thank you. I am writing now, but it is a long read, so be patient. --[[User:Krator]] ([[User talk:Krator|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Krator|c]]) 23:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
544151 +++$+++ Krator +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544149 +++$+++ 544150 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.183535220E09 +++$+++ Completed. -- +++$+++ ::Completed. --[[User:Krator]] ([[User talk:Krator|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Krator|c]]) 00:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
544152 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544149 +++$+++ 544149 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.183528560E09 +++$+++ Tim - you said at your editor review that a conflict with SlimVirgin over some policy or another makes you question your dispute resolution handling skills.  Surely someone with as many edits as you have has had ''other'' disputes over your time on Wikipedia - have those all gone smoothly?  I don't want to say too much, but what you've said here doesn't strike me as any indication there's any problem with your dispute handling skills.  Cheers,  +++$+++ *Tim - you said at your editor review that a conflict with SlimVirgin over some policy or another makes you question your dispute resolution handling skills.  Surely someone with as many edits as you have has had ''other'' disputes over your time on Wikipedia - have those all gone smoothly?  I don't want to say too much, but what you've said here doesn't strike me as any indication there's any problem with your dispute handling skills.  Cheers, [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 22:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
544153 +++$+++ WilyD +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544149 +++$+++ 544149 +++$+++ 2007-07-03 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.183530660E09 +++$+++ Tim - I hope you're not beating yourself up over this.  You stepped into a minefield and came out pretty much intact.  Editing policies pages is dicey, and even simple stuff like correcting grammer can get hairy.  I don't want to speak ill of any editors - so I won't.  The problematic behaviour here really isn't yours.  In general, you should proceed much more slowly and with more talking on policy pages - but even well reasoned uncontraversial edits with good talk page consensus beforehand run a real risk of being reverted - for \"stability\" or ownership issues or just as a reaction by editors who watch the policy page but ignore the talk page.   All in all, if you consider this \"handling yourself poorly\" you're well ahead of the crowd.  Heck, I'm involved in an \"edit war\" that's left a page locked for three months now - maybe I'm not the best person to ask.   +++$+++ *Tim - I hope you're not beating yourself up over this.  You stepped into a minefield and came out pretty much intact.  Editing policies pages is dicey, and even simple stuff like correcting grammer can get hairy.  I don't want to speak ill of any editors - so I won't.  The problematic behaviour here really isn't yours.  In general, you should proceed much more slowly and with more talking on policy pages - but even well reasoned uncontraversial edits with good talk page consensus beforehand run a real risk of being reverted - for "stability" or ownership issues or just as a reaction by editors who watch the policy page but ignore the talk page.   All in all, if you consider this "handling yourself poorly" you're well ahead of the crowd.  Heck, I'm involved in an "edit war" that's left a page locked for three months now - maybe I'm not the best person to ask.  [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 23:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
544154 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544149 +++$+++ 544153 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.183537800E09 +++$+++ I'll see what I can do tomorrow, but I don't think I'll have much to add; remember, I don't have much conflict experience :)  +++$+++ **I'll see what I can do tomorrow, but I don't think I'll have much to add; remember, I don't have much conflict experience :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 01:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
544155 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544149 +++$+++ 544154 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.183666380E09 +++$+++ Note: I haven't forgotten :) Have just been too busy off-Wiki for anything this demanding of attention. I don't want to just do a \"drive-by\" review!  +++$+++ ***Note: I haven't forgotten :) Have just been too busy off-Wiki for anything this demanding of attention. I don't want to just do a "drive-by" review! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 13:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
544156 +++$+++ Shyamal +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544149 +++$+++ 544149 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 02:00:00 +++$+++ 1.183539600E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, my own impression was that this conflict was just another great reason for that stable version feature for Wikipedia. If the policy articles were created by a committee which had given considerable thought, then it deserved to be blanket-protected by the system. I got the impression that SV was not really protecting it based on analysis of your edits, but as a kind of general protection policy when the people responsible for it were away. With this reading of the circumstances there was really no ownership involved there and I suspect that your edits might even have gone through if you had edited it in tiny bits over many days. Not worth mulling so much over. Cheers.  +++$+++ *Hi Tim, my own impression was that this conflict was just another great reason for that stable version feature for Wikipedia. If the policy articles were created by a committee which had given considerable thought, then it deserved to be blanket-protected by the system. I got the impression that SV was not really protecting it based on analysis of your edits, but as a kind of general protection policy when the people responsible for it were away. With this reading of the circumstances there was really no ownership involved there and I suspect that your edits might even have gone through if you had edited it in tiny bits over many days. Not worth mulling so much over. Cheers. [[User:Shyamal|Shyamal]] 02:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

520972 +++$+++ BuddingJournalist +++$+++ Rmky87 +++$+++ 520972 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-31 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.170233700E09 +++$+++ Good catch! I should probably start Googling phrases from these articles that seem overly fawning and not encyclopedic so that I don't waste time copy-editing them...  +++$+++ Good catch! I should probably start Googling phrases from these articles that seem overly fawning and not encyclopedic so that I don't waste time copy-editing them... [[User:BuddingJournalist|BuddingJournalist]] 00:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
520973 +++$+++ Rmky87 +++$+++ Rmky87 +++$+++ 520972 +++$+++ 520972 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.170235140E09 +++$+++ Thank you!-- +++$+++ :Thank you!--[[User:Rmky87|Rmky87]] 01:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

483908 +++$+++ Kwsn +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-30 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.196478960E09 +++$+++ You're being paged. <font face=\"comic sans ms\"> +++$+++ You're being paged. <font face="comic sans ms">[[User:Kwsn|<span style="color: #000080">'''Kwsn'''</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Kwsn|<span style="color: #000080 ">(Ni!)</span>]]</small></font> 19:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
483909 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483908 +++$+++ 483908 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.196479320E09 +++$+++ Done, thank you.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Done, thank you.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 19:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

282013 +++$+++ Hike395 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-05-08 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.115592300E09 +++$+++ Thanks! --  +++$+++ Thanks! -- [[User:Hike395|hike395]] 15:45, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
282014 +++$+++ Hike395 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282013 +++$+++ 282013 +++$+++ 2005-05-11 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.115816760E09 +++$+++ Sorry to be a pest --- this is both to protect Wikipedia and to protect you. --  +++$+++ :Sorry to be a pest --- this is both to protect Wikipedia and to protect you. -- [[User:Hike395|hike395]] 06:06, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
282015 +++$+++ Hike395 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282013 +++$+++ 282014 +++$+++ 2005-05-11 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.115860200E09 +++$+++ Hope this helps! --  +++$+++ ::Hope this helps! -- [[User:Hike395|hike395]] 18:10, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
282016 +++$+++ Hike395 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282013 +++$+++ 282015 +++$+++ 2005-05-15 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.116141840E09 +++$+++ Well done!!! I think everything is fine now. Thanks for doing this! --  +++$+++ :::Well done!!! I think everything is fine now. Thanks for doing this! -- [[User:Hike395|hike395]] 00:24, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

19872 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19872 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-21 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.303376460E09 +++$+++ Ayuda por favor, hasta otra y saludos Portugueses - -- +++$+++ Ayuda por favor, hasta otra y saludos Portugueses - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 02:01, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
19873 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mega60 +++$+++ 19872 +++$+++ 19872 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.303811160E09 +++$+++ Gracias por todo como siempre hombre. Otra vez con lo de FUTBOLME.COM, podr\xedas mirar lo \"de siempre\" en [[Real Betis]]? Gracias por adelantado - -- +++$+++ *Gracias por todo como siempre hombre. Otra vez con lo de FUTBOLME.COM, podrías mirar lo "de siempre" en [[Real Betis]]? Gracias por adelantado - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 02:46, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

282017 +++$+++ Burgundavia +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282017 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-05-27 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.117212720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Burgundavia|Burgundavia]] <small>([[User talk:Burgundavia|&#9992; take a flight?]])</small> 09:52, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
282018 +++$+++ Burgundavia +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282017 +++$+++ 282017 +++$+++ 2005-05-28 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.117308960E09 +++$+++ Just to confirm and clarify, you created the map? Also, copyright is automatic, and thus we need to make certain we get a good licence. Otherwise, thanks for the response.  +++$+++ *Just to confirm and clarify, you created the map? Also, copyright is automatic, and thus we need to make certain we get a good licence. Otherwise, thanks for the response. [[User:Burgundavia|Burgundavia]] <small>([[User talk:Burgundavia|&#9992; take a flight?]])</small> 12:36, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

282019 +++$+++ Spundun +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282019 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-09 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.118324580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the great images. -- +++$+++ Thanks for the great images. --[[User:Spundun|Spundun]] 06:43, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
282020 +++$+++ Spundun +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282019 +++$+++ 282019 +++$+++ 2005-06-09 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.118360880E09 +++$+++ Hope this helps. -- +++$+++ : Hope this helps. --[[User:Spundun|Spundun]] 16:48, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

19879 +++$+++ ToddC4176 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19879 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-29 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.243585860E09 +++$+++ I was checking out the article on the Unitarian Society in Fall River that you contributed to, and there's a lot that was wrong.  I want to reconcile what you know with what I know so we can get this article right... a little help here?  +++$+++ I was checking out the article on the Unitarian Society in Fall River that you contributed to, and there's a lot that was wrong.  I want to reconcile what you know with what I know so we can get this article right... a little help here? [[User:ToddC4176|ToddC4176]] ([[User talk:ToddC4176|talk]]) 01:31, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
19880 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19879 +++$+++ 19879 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.243666380E09 +++$+++ See my comments in the article discussion.-- +++$+++ *See my comments in the article discussion.--[[User:Marcbela|Marcbela]] ([[User talk:Marcbela#top|talk]]) 23:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

544168 +++$+++ Crum375 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-06 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.183711500E09 +++$+++ (outdent) I don't recall saying I was happy with any version, except the specific wording you asked me about, which had to do with exceptional claims. I insisted and still do that per NPOV we cannot discriminate against any reliable source, and instead should focus on the merits of each source.  +++$+++ (outdent) I don't recall saying I was happy with any version, except the specific wording you asked me about, which had to do with exceptional claims. I insisted and still do that per NPOV we cannot discriminate against any reliable source, and instead should focus on the merits of each source. [[User:Crum375|Crum375]] 01:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
544169 +++$+++ Crum375 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544168 +++$+++ 544168 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.183711920E09 +++$+++ I think that a policy must be broad and based on ''all'' cases, not ''most'' cases. Also, I think we should concentrate this discussion in the relevant Talk pages, as it's not a personal issue between us.  +++$+++ :I think that a policy must be broad and based on ''all'' cases, not ''most'' cases. Also, I think we should concentrate this discussion in the relevant Talk pages, as it's not a personal issue between us. [[User:Crum375|Crum375]] 01:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

19882 +++$+++ Denimadept +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19882 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-14 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.247628120E09 +++$+++ Can you get over there and take pictures of the site?  From what I gather, they're putting a temporary bridge in place, a [[Bailey Bridge]], with steel pipe piers and everything.  If you can't do it, just let me know and I'll try to get to it this weekend. -  +++$+++ Can you get over there and take pictures of the site?  From what I gather, they're putting a temporary bridge in place, a [[Bailey Bridge]], with steel pipe piers and everything.  If you can't do it, just let me know and I'll try to get to it this weekend. - [[User:Denimadept|Denimadept]] ([[User talk:Denimadept|talk]]) 20:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
19883 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19882 +++$+++ 19882 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.247727480E09 +++$+++ I went by there tonight and they are just starting to drive piles for the temporary abutments. -- +++$+++ *I went by there tonight and they are just starting to drive piles for the temporary abutments. --[[User:Marcbela|Marcbela]] ([[User talk:Marcbela#top|talk]]) 23:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
19884 +++$+++ Denimadept +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19882 +++$+++ 19882 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.247738040E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that's what the project page says.  Three percent done on the temp bridge.  I guess it's too soon. -  +++$+++ :Yeah, that's what the project page says.  Three percent done on the temp bridge.  I guess it's too soon. - [[User:Denimadept|Denimadept]] ([[User talk:Denimadept|talk]]) 02:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
19885 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19882 +++$+++ 19882 +++$+++ 2009-11-24 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.259113200E09 +++$+++ Looks like they have got the caps on: http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mrthomsen\/4087330817\/in\/pool-originalplymouthcolony\/ -- +++$+++ *Looks like they have got the caps on: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrthomsen/4087330817/in/pool-originalplymouthcolony/ --[[User:Marcbela|Marcbela]] ([[User talk:Marcbela#top|talk]]) 17:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
19886 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19882 +++$+++ 19882 +++$+++ 2010-02-21 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.266796920E09 +++$+++ See a photo of the temp span here: http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mrthomsen\/4319997673\/in\/photostream\/ -- +++$+++ *See a photo of the temp span here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrthomsen/4319997673/in/photostream/ --[[User:Marcbela|Marcbela]] ([[User talk:Marcbela#top|talk]]) 16:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

282027 +++$+++ Admrboltz +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-12 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.137055140E09 +++$+++ |}  +++$+++ |} [[User:Admrboltz|Admrboltz]] <small>([[User talk:Admrboltz|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Admrboltz|C]])</small> 00:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
282028 +++$+++ Admrboltz +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282027 +++$+++ 282027 +++$+++ 2006-01-15 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.137329280E09 +++$+++ The image is listed for deletion currently at [[WP:IfD]] because it is not used in any articles. If you wish, you can upload it to the Wikimedia Commons [[commons:Main Page]] where all Wiki's will have access to it. -- +++$+++ :The image is listed for deletion currently at [[WP:IfD]] because it is not used in any articles. If you wish, you can upload it to the Wikimedia Commons [[commons:Main Page]] where all Wiki's will have access to it. --[[User:Admrboltz|Admrboltz]] <small>([[User talk:Admrboltz|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Admrboltz|C]])</small> 04:48, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

19887 +++$+++ Jameslwoodward +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-22 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.261547400E09 +++$+++ [[File:Lower Mills MA.jpg|thumb|left|50px]] I thought I'd let you know -- unless you live in Milton there's no reason you would -- the subject photo was used, properly credited, in a 2010 calendar issued by GKR Residential of Milton (www.gkrresidential.com). I live in Milton, so I got one in the mail.  They applied a water color texture which I'm not sure I like, and did other manipulation, but that's what the license lets them do.  They'll surely send you one if you ask. Regards, . . . . <strong>Jim<\/strong> . . . .  +++$+++ [[File:Lower Mills MA.jpg|thumb|left|50px]] I thought I'd let you know -- unless you live in Milton there's no reason you would -- the subject photo was used, properly credited, in a 2010 calendar issued by GKR Residential of Milton (www.gkrresidential.com). I live in Milton, so I got one in the mail.  They applied a water color texture which I'm not sure I like, and did other manipulation, but that's what the license lets them do.  They'll surely send you one if you ask. Regards, . . . . <strong>Jim</strong> . . . . [[User:Jameslwoodward|Jameslwoodward]] ([[User talk:Jameslwoodward|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jameslwoodward|contribs]])  21:50, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
19888 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19887 +++$+++ 19887 +++$+++ 2009-12-23 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.261558680E09 +++$+++ That is why I do Public Domain. So I don't have to worry about anything. I feel the information is worth more than I'll ever make off them.-- +++$+++ *That is why I do Public Domain. So I don't have to worry about anything. I feel the information is worth more than I'll ever make off them.--[[User:Marcbela|Marcbela]] ([[User talk:Marcbela#top|talk]]) 00:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

282032 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-08 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.144494420E09 +++$+++ Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Image legality questions|Image legality questions page]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Image legality questions|Image legality questions page]]. Thank you. [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 04:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
282033 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282032 +++$+++ 282032 +++$+++ 2006-04-08 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.144539900E09 +++$+++ Perfect.  Tracking down the date that the creator died, updating the image description page with that information, and using the correct tag gives us everything we need.  Thanks for sorting it out.   +++$+++ :Perfect.  Tracking down the date that the creator died, updating the image description page with that information, and using the correct tag gives us everything we need.  Thanks for sorting it out.  [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 16:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

544177 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-09 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.184010000E09 +++$+++ Is it true that the book \"The Blind Watchmaker: why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design\" is misleading about genetic drift and should be removed?-- +++$+++ Is it true that the book "The Blind Watchmaker: why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design" is misleading about genetic drift and should be removed?--[[User:Filll|Filll]] 12:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
544178 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544177 +++$+++ 544177 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.184212020E09 +++$+++ An editor has removed it twice now from [[Introduction to evolution]]. My coauthors do not seem to be around and I am not a biologist. What is your opinion?-- +++$+++ :An editor has removed it twice now from [[Introduction to evolution]]. My coauthors do not seem to be around and I am not a biologist. What is your opinion?--[[User:Filll|Filll]] 20:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

282034 +++$+++ Guettarda +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-06 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.146947820E09 +++$+++ Hi John.  How are you doing?  I noticed you were adding this reference, and I was wondering if you might be interested in writing an article about the Trinidad Regional Virus Lab.  I have wanted to for a long time, but I didn't have a reference for it (didn't know where to look for a reference).  I think it would be a great addition.   +++$+++ Hi John.  How are you doing?  I noticed you were adding this reference, and I was wondering if you might be interested in writing an article about the Trinidad Regional Virus Lab.  I have wanted to for a long time, but I didn't have a reference for it (didn't know where to look for a reference).  I think it would be a great addition.  [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] 13:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
282035 +++$+++ Davidruben +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282034 +++$+++ 282034 +++$+++ 2006-05-07 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.146991980E09 +++$+++ Extra details, if available, would help expand on the reference you gave: specifically year of publication and any online copy or PubMed abstract number (see [http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/entrez\/query.fcgi PubMed search]).  +++$+++ * Extra details, if available, would help expand on the reference you gave: specifically year of publication and any online copy or PubMed abstract number (see [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi PubMed search]). [[User:Davidruben|David Ruben]] <sup> [[User talk:Davidruben|Talk]] </sup> 01:53, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

19891 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19891 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-09 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.276076880E09 +++$+++ an article, [[The Hiker]], that you had written several yeas ago and was about to launch into it when I thought I'd see if you were still active (glad to see that you are) and discuss various issues with you.  The term \"the hiker\" as it is used here, referred to American soldiers who fought in Cuba, the Philippines and China around 1900.  There were statues made commemorating their ventures and adventures by at least two different sculptors.  One, was [[Theo Alice Ruggles Kitson]] and she created the one pictured in the article, but at least one of the statues, maybe more, that are listed in the article was\/were made by [[Allen George Newman]].  I am not quite sure how this needs be be resolved but I thought that I chat it over with you before doing anything rash.  Einar aka  +++$+++ an article, [[The Hiker]], that you had written several yeas ago and was about to launch into it when I thought I'd see if you were still active (glad to see that you are) and discuss various issues with you.  The term "the hiker" as it is used here, referred to American soldiers who fought in Cuba, the Philippines and China around 1900.  There were statues made commemorating their ventures and adventures by at least two different sculptors.  One, was [[Theo Alice Ruggles Kitson]] and she created the one pictured in the article, but at least one of the statues, maybe more, that are listed in the article was/were made by [[Allen George Newman]].  I am not quite sure how this needs be be resolved but I thought that I chat it over with you before doing anything rash.  Einar aka [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] ([[User talk:Carptrash|talk]]) 02:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
19892 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19891 +++$+++ 19891 +++$+++ 2010-06-09 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.276111740E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I have no idea about the creator of the statues.-- +++$+++ *Sorry, I have no idea about the creator of the statues.--[[User:Marcbela|Marcbela]] ([[User talk:Marcbela#top|talk]]) 12:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
19893 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19891 +++$+++ 19892 +++$+++ 2010-06-09 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.276140120E09 +++$+++ My thought was that the article gives the impression that the term \"Hiker\" is about one particular state when that's not really accurate.  As I make edits just keep an eye on them and feel free to leap in at any time, for any reason.  Life is supposed to be interesting.   +++$+++ :: My thought was that the article gives the impression that the term "Hiker" is about one particular state when that's not really accurate.  As I make edits just keep an eye on them and feel free to leap in at any time, for any reason.  Life is supposed to be interesting.  [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] ([[User talk:Carptrash|talk]]) 20:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

282036 +++$+++ Waqas.usman +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282036 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-07 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.147032300E09 +++$+++ I was cleaning up geographical categories and articles and noticed these articles you contributed to. The [[Kurram River]] article often refers to [[Kurram Valley]] by ''it'' e.g. \"It is highly irrigated, well peopled...\", the article has no proper flow, could you please clean it up and write separately about [[Kurram River]] and [[Kurram Valley]]? Thanks.  +++$+++ I was cleaning up geographical categories and articles and noticed these articles you contributed to. The [[Kurram River]] article often refers to [[Kurram Valley]] by ''it'' e.g. "It is highly irrigated, well peopled...", the article has no proper flow, could you please clean it up and write separately about [[Kurram River]] and [[Kurram Valley]]? Thanks. [[User:Waqas.usman|Waqas.usman]] 13:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
282037 +++$+++ Waqas.usman +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282036 +++$+++ 282036 +++$+++ 2006-05-10 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.147285440E09 +++$+++ Thank you John, I don't know much about the areas and I felt that I should not update the articles. Thank you for your contribution! I'll try to find some pics from the area. BTW does [[Khyber Pass]] lie in Kurram Agency or Kurram Valley? Coz we have a pic of [[Khyber Pass]].  +++$+++ :Thank you John, I don't know much about the areas and I felt that I should not update the articles. Thank you for your contribution! I'll try to find some pics from the area. BTW does [[Khyber Pass]] lie in Kurram Agency or Kurram Valley? Coz we have a pic of [[Khyber Pass]]. [[User:Waqas.usman|Waqas.usman]] 11:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
282038 +++$+++ Waqas.usman +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282036 +++$+++ 282037 +++$+++ 2006-05-10 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.147323780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply. You're right :( Let's pray for peace in the other regions of the world plagued by war as well.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the reply. You're right :( Let's pray for peace in the other regions of the world plagued by war as well. [[User:Waqas.usman|Waqas.usman]] 22:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

19894 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-28 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.298891100E09 +++$+++ I am further breaking the Hiker down into [[The Hiker (Kitson)]] and [[The Hiker (Newman]].  The Fall River MA edition article  [[opinion|should]] be incorporated into the Kitson article.  Einar aka  +++$+++ I am further breaking the Hiker down into [[The Hiker (Kitson)]] and [[The Hiker (Newman]].  The Fall River MA edition article  [[opinion|should]] be incorporated into the Kitson article.  Einar aka [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] ([[User talk:Carptrash|talk]]) 03:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
19895 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19894 +++$+++ 19894 +++$+++ 2011-02-28 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.298923860E09 +++$+++ Done! -Do you know the date for the Fall River one?-- +++$+++ *Done! -Do you know the date for the Fall River one?--[[User:Marcbela|Marcbela]] ([[User talk:Marcbela#top|talk]]) 12:11, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

19896 +++$+++ Faolin42 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19896 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-28 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.277709720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the correction.  Good thing you had the right image!  I had incidently taken a picture of the original library too, but didn't know what it was (and it wasn't a very good picture anyway...)  +++$+++ Thanks for the correction.  Good thing you had the right image!  I had incidently taken a picture of the original library too, but didn't know what it was (and it wasn't a very good picture anyway...) [[User:Faolin42|Faolin42]] ([[User talk:Faolin42|talk]]) 00:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
19897 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19896 +++$+++ 19896 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.277709780E09 +++$+++ I incorporated your new image into the article.-- +++$+++ *I incorporated your new image into the article.--[[User:Marcbela|Marcbela]] ([[User talk:Marcbela#top|talk]]) 00:23, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
19898 +++$+++ Faolin42 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19896 +++$+++ 19897 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.277710260E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  Are these coordinates correct for the old library? {{coord|42|12|24.2|N|71|0|17.8|W|region:US}}  +++$+++ **Thanks!  Are these coordinates correct for the old library? {{coord|42|12|24.2|N|71|0|17.8|W|region:US}} [[User:Faolin42|Faolin42]] ([[User talk:Faolin42|talk]]) 00:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
19899 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19896 +++$+++ 19898 +++$+++ 2010-06-28 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.277710320E09 +++$+++ Spot on!-- +++$+++ ***Spot on!--[[User:Marcbela|Marcbela]] ([[User talk:Marcbela#top|talk]]) 00:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

544185 +++$+++ Nehrams2020 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544185 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-11 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.184220900E09 +++$+++ I've seen you around GAC and have noticed you've done well with the reviews and that you have experience with FAs. I was wondering if you could take a look at [[Oklahoma City bombing]] and leave some comments at its peer review. I've never gone to FA before, and I need to know what the article has to have before I head to FAC. If you don't have the time, or if this doesn't interest you, then don't worry about. Keep up the good work with the reviews. -- +++$+++ I've seen you around GAC and have noticed you've done well with the reviews and that you have experience with FAs. I was wondering if you could take a look at [[Oklahoma City bombing]] and leave some comments at its peer review. I've never gone to FA before, and I need to know what the article has to have before I head to FAC. If you don't have the time, or if this doesn't interest you, then don't worry about. Keep up the good work with the reviews. --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] 23:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
544186 +++$+++ Nehrams2020 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544185 +++$+++ 544185 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.184225460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for looking it over, I really appreciate. I'll address the issues as I find information for them. Also, thanks for correcting the links and cutting some statements. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for looking it over, I really appreciate. I'll address the issues as I find information for them. Also, thanks for correcting the links and cutting some statements. --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] 00:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

282043 +++$+++ LiquidGhoul +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-26 07:53:00 +++$+++ 1.156603980E09 +++$+++ I read on your user page that you are interested in Cape York wildlife. Do you have any frog photos that aren't represented on Wikipedia? The only tropical frog photos are of the [[Giant Tree Frog]] (''Litoria infrafrenata''), and those also found south. Thanks -- +++$+++ I read on your user page that you are interested in Cape York wildlife. Do you have any frog photos that aren't represented on Wikipedia? The only tropical frog photos are of the [[Giant Tree Frog]] (''Litoria infrafrenata''), and those also found south. Thanks --[[User:LiquidGhoul|liquidGhoul]] 07:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
282044 +++$+++ LiquidGhoul +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282043 +++$+++ 282043 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.156604460E09 +++$+++ I would love to! How would you like to do it? Email or upload them? -- +++$+++ :I would love to! How would you like to do it? Email or upload them? --[[User:LiquidGhoul|liquidGhoul]] 08:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
282045 +++$+++ LiquidGhoul +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282043 +++$+++ 282044 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.156614480E09 +++$+++ Uploading to commons would be the best bet. Just name the photos descriptively (e.g. tree frog qld) or what you think they may be . Names aren't important, categorisation is, and we can figure how to categorise after uploading. Thanks. -- +++$+++ ::Uploading to commons would be the best bet. Just name the photos descriptively (e.g. tree frog qld) or what you think they may be . Names aren't important, categorisation is, and we can figure how to categorise after uploading. Thanks. --[[User:LiquidGhoul|liquidGhoul]] 10:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
282046 +++$+++ LiquidGhoul +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282043 +++$+++ 282045 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.156658340E09 +++$+++ Yep, email them to me then. (removed email for spam) -- +++$+++ :::Yep, email them to me then. (removed email for spam) --[[User:LiquidGhoul|liquidGhoul]] 22:59, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
282047 +++$+++ LiquidGhoul +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282043 +++$+++ 282046 +++$+++ 2006-08-26 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.156659360E09 +++$+++ North Queensland frogs are in a bit more trouble than the southern frogs. There seems to be more diseases which are affecting them. Having said that, droughts are a natural thing, and populations will increase again. There is suspicion that the Cane Toads are being affected by disease, and it is good news to hear it is having a noticeable effect. The current advice is to not kill adults. It takes a while for the disease to take affect, and it needs to be passed from adult to child. However, I still reccomend killing tadpoles, eggs and juveniles (only if you know what they are!). I was very surprised to see that you have goannas in your backyard, I thought they were getting rare because of the Cane Toads. -- +++$+++ ::::North Queensland frogs are in a bit more trouble than the southern frogs. There seems to be more diseases which are affecting them. Having said that, droughts are a natural thing, and populations will increase again. There is suspicion that the Cane Toads are being affected by disease, and it is good news to hear it is having a noticeable effect. The current advice is to not kill adults. It takes a while for the disease to take affect, and it needs to be passed from adult to child. However, I still reccomend killing tadpoles, eggs and juveniles (only if you know what they are!). I was very surprised to see that you have goannas in your backyard, I thought they were getting rare because of the Cane Toads. --[[User:LiquidGhoul|liquidGhoul]] 23:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
282048 +++$+++ LiquidGhoul +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282043 +++$+++ 282047 +++$+++ 2006-08-30 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.156932960E09 +++$+++ Desert Tree Frog is on the main page today. -- +++$+++ :::::Desert Tree Frog is on the main page today. --[[User:LiquidGhoul|liquidGhoul]] 03:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

544188 +++$+++ Peter morrell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544188 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-12 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.184283360E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, neither of us got that far, specifically we were BOTH about to get to the dreaded 3 reverts when it seemed better to try and 'suspend operations' and call a breathing space which is when I contacted you. That is the current situation. What he had done was to remove bland & neutral longstanding material that was NPOV narrative all fully referenced and when I rvt that he rvt back and so it went on...we need to have someone wade in and take stock so we can proceed through '''negotiated consensus'''...similar situation to what happened last year as you will recall. please check it over and do as you see fit. I am sure as a Biochem PhD man all will respect your sound advice and skilled impartial editing as much as I do. thanks  +++$+++ Hi Tim, neither of us got that far, specifically we were BOTH about to get to the dreaded 3 reverts when it seemed better to try and 'suspend operations' and call a breathing space which is when I contacted you. That is the current situation. What he had done was to remove bland & neutral longstanding material that was NPOV narrative all fully referenced and when I rvt that he rvt back and so it went on...we need to have someone wade in and take stock so we can proceed through '''negotiated consensus'''...similar situation to what happened last year as you will recall. please check it over and do as you see fit. I am sure as a Biochem PhD man all will respect your sound advice and skilled impartial editing as much as I do. thanks [[User talk:Peter morrell|Peter morrell]] 16:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
544189 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544188 +++$+++ 544188 +++$+++ 2007-07-12 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.184284380E09 +++$+++ Peter, apparently you missed my credentials.  Let's see, an MD with 6 years fellowship in Cardiology, an MS in Biochemical Endocrinology, publications in drug interactions with cardiovascular tissue, and a long history of medical research.  Tim, what you are missing is that there is an critical importance in keeping this junk medicine absolutely verified.  If the Evolution article makes an error, the world will be a bit sadder, but in the end no damage done.  If someone reads the Evolution article, and is misinformed, then sure maybe the Creationists get another point to cause their holy war, and I'm all right with it.  In any medical article, NPOV has to be absolute.  If the article does not provide accurate, sourced, refereed and primary data that supports any claims made, then Wikipedia has a moral, yes moral, obligation to delete it.  As long as Wikipedia is the #1 hit on Google, people will come here to make a self-diagnosis, to find out how to treat their disease, to treat their children or loved-ones--if articles provide inaccurate, poorly sourced, or downright dangerous information, then we are harming people.  \"Physician, do no harm,\" is the primary ethos of an MD--how can I countenance bad writing, bad research or anything that promotes bad medicine.  Homeopathy kills.  Read the article, specifically against the UK physicians who diluted malarial medications to such a point that patients either became very ill or died.  Homeopathy is NOT the only article on Wikipedia where these people are attempting to promote unverified \"treatments\" that will kill people, but it is one that I have chosen to clean up.  I do not know nor care what Peter Morrell's motives are--but his edits are dangerous.  Rarely will I stand on moral principle, because morality so hard to define.  But if A will kill someone and B will not, and that is verified by research, then B ought to be the only point discussed.  Undue weight of NPOV means we do not allow minority, and frankly dangerous, POV's to enter articles.  I presumed you had a Ph.D. in a scientific discipline--you would never allow this junk science enter an article you are writing.  One last point--[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AOrangemarlin&diff=144144873&oldid=144097888 this comment], specifically \"weird dude\", \"know nothing\" and \"persistent vandalism\" constitute [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]].   +++$+++ :Peter, apparently you missed my credentials.  Let's see, an MD with 6 years fellowship in Cardiology, an MS in Biochemical Endocrinology, publications in drug interactions with cardiovascular tissue, and a long history of medical research.  Tim, what you are missing is that there is an critical importance in keeping this junk medicine absolutely verified.  If the Evolution article makes an error, the world will be a bit sadder, but in the end no damage done.  If someone reads the Evolution article, and is misinformed, then sure maybe the Creationists get another point to cause their holy war, and I'm all right with it.  In any medical article, NPOV has to be absolute.  If the article does not provide accurate, sourced, refereed and primary data that supports any claims made, then Wikipedia has a moral, yes moral, obligation to delete it.  As long as Wikipedia is the #1 hit on Google, people will come here to make a self-diagnosis, to find out how to treat their disease, to treat their children or loved-ones--if articles provide inaccurate, poorly sourced, or downright dangerous information, then we are harming people.  "Physician, do no harm," is the primary ethos of an MD--how can I countenance bad writing, bad research or anything that promotes bad medicine.  Homeopathy kills.  Read the article, specifically against the UK physicians who diluted malarial medications to such a point that patients either became very ill or died.  Homeopathy is NOT the only article on Wikipedia where these people are attempting to promote unverified "treatments" that will kill people, but it is one that I have chosen to clean up.  I do not know nor care what Peter Morrell's motives are--but his edits are dangerous.  Rarely will I stand on moral principle, because morality so hard to define.  But if A will kill someone and B will not, and that is verified by research, then B ought to be the only point discussed.  Undue weight of NPOV means we do not allow minority, and frankly dangerous, POV's to enter articles.  I presumed you had a Ph.D. in a scientific discipline--you would never allow this junk science enter an article you are writing.  One last point--[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AOrangemarlin&diff=144144873&oldid=144097888 this comment], specifically "weird dude", "know nothing" and "persistent vandalism" constitute [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]].  [[User:Orangemarlin|Orangemarlin]] 16:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

19902 +++$+++ DASHBot +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-28 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.306584120E09 +++$+++ Thank you, --  +++$+++ Thank you, -- [[User:DASHBot|DASHBot]] ([[User talk:DASHBot|talk]]) 05:02, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
19903 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19902 +++$+++ 19902 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.310666100E09 +++$+++ Looks good to me.-- +++$+++ :Looks good to me.--[[User:Marcbela|Marcbela]] ([[User talk:Marcbela#top|talk]]) 10:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
19904 +++$+++ Pi.1415926535 +++$+++ Marcbela +++$+++ 19902 +++$+++ 19903 +++$+++ 2011-07-14 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.310680200E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I've now added it to the page.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. I've now added it to the page. [[User:Pi.1415926535|Pi.1415926535]] ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|talk]]) 14:50, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

282049 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-27 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.156669380E09 +++$+++ While it is a very nice quote, we don't really want to be collecting such things in the encyclopedia articles.  There's some talk of trying to get [[Extinction]] to [[Wikipedia:Featured article]] status, so I'm more motivated to keep things neat and tidy there.  [[Wikiquote]] is really the place for that sort of thing.   +++$+++ While it is a very nice quote, we don't really want to be collecting such things in the encyclopedia articles.  There's some talk of trying to get [[Extinction]] to [[Wikipedia:Featured article]] status, so I'm more motivated to keep things neat and tidy there.  [[Wikiquote]] is really the place for that sort of thing.  [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 02:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
282050 +++$+++ Jkelly +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282049 +++$+++ 282049 +++$+++ 2006-08-27 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.156734000E09 +++$+++ I don't know a lot about how Wikiquote is organised, actually.  If you go to [[wikiquote:Extinction]], you'll see that the Beebe quote is there.  From my brief experience with it, Wikiquote seems to duplicate quotations, so that every quote goes into a topic page (like \"Extinction\"), and the author page (in this case Beebe).  There is no Beebe page on Wikiquote, so right now that quote is only in the Extinction Wikiquote article.  If you feel inspired, you could start a page for Beebe there...  +++$+++ :I don't know a lot about how Wikiquote is organised, actually.  If you go to [[wikiquote:Extinction]], you'll see that the Beebe quote is there.  From my brief experience with it, Wikiquote seems to duplicate quotations, so that every quote goes into a topic page (like "Extinction"), and the author page (in this case Beebe).  There is no Beebe page on Wikiquote, so right now that quote is only in the Extinction Wikiquote article.  If you feel inspired, you could start a page for Beebe there... [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 20:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

19906 +++$+++ Pcb21 +++$+++ Joel7687 +++$+++ 19906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-15 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.121450880E09 +++$+++ In the EB project, are you creating redirects to non-existent articles? I've seen it a happen a few times but not sure who is doing it. Thanks,  +++$+++ In the EB project, are you creating redirects to non-existent articles? I've seen it a happen a few times but not sure who is doing it. Thanks, [[User:Pcb21|Pcb21|]] [[User_talk:Pcb21|Pete]] 11:08, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
19907 +++$+++ Pcb21 +++$+++ Joel7687 +++$+++ 19906 +++$+++ 19906 +++$+++ 2005-07-15 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.121465040E09 +++$+++ Ah ok. I thought it was the first time I had seen you do that, but wasn't totally sure. I also do the same thing - create the redirect and then the article. Thanks for knocking out those \/Us  +++$+++ :Ah ok. I thought it was the first time I had seen you do that, but wasn't totally sure. I also do the same thing - create the redirect and then the article. Thanks for knocking out those /Us [[User:Pcb21|Pcb21|]] [[User_talk:Pcb21|Pete]] 15:04, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
19908 +++$+++ Pcb21 +++$+++ Joel7687 +++$+++ 19906 +++$+++ 19907 +++$+++ 2005-07-24 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.122266040E09 +++$+++ Great work you are doing. Thanks again!  +++$+++ ::Great work you are doing. Thanks again! [[User:Pcb21|Pcb21|]] [[User_talk:Pcb21|Pete]] 21:34, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

19909 +++$+++ Defrosted +++$+++ Joel7687 +++$+++ 19909 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-28 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.122567060E09 +++$+++ BTW, looking at your collection of online bookmarks, I wonder if you have heard of (or maybe even joined) [[Distributed Proofreaders]], the network of volunteers who prepare the texts that are submitted to Project Gutenberg for online release.  In the proofreading process, you get to read about things that you probably would not encounter in print everyday, though Wikipedia definitely has far greater and wider opportunities for esoteric adventure if that is what piques your curiosity. -- +++$+++ BTW, looking at your collection of online bookmarks, I wonder if you have heard of (or maybe even joined) [[Distributed Proofreaders]], the network of volunteers who prepare the texts that are submitted to Project Gutenberg for online release.  In the proofreading process, you get to read about things that you probably would not encounter in print everyday, though Wikipedia definitely has far greater and wider opportunities for esoteric adventure if that is what piques your curiosity. --[[User:Defrosted|Defrosted]] 09:11, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
19910 +++$+++ Defrosted +++$+++ Joel7687 +++$+++ 19909 +++$+++ 19909 +++$+++ 2005-07-28 10:06:00 +++$+++ 1.122570360E09 +++$+++ Don't worry at all - the edit conflict was a symptom of overenthusiasm on both sides and didn't cause any real trouble.  Please continue deleting bluelinks whenever you deem it appropriate to do so.  I don't do blanket pruning and only remove items if they fall within my own sphere of interest or knowledge and if I can verify with certainty the correctness of the redirect.-- +++$+++ : Don't worry at all - the edit conflict was a symptom of overenthusiasm on both sides and didn't cause any real trouble.  Please continue deleting bluelinks whenever you deem it appropriate to do so.  I don't do blanket pruning and only remove items if they fall within my own sphere of interest or knowledge and if I can verify with certainty the correctness of the redirect.--[[User:Defrosted|Defrosted]] 10:06, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

282054 +++$+++ UtherSRG +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-19 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.161281700E09 +++$+++ Which parts of the text does the reference you added apply? Please don't just slap in a reference. -  +++$+++ Which parts of the text does the reference you added apply? Please don't just slap in a reference. - [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 11:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
282055 +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282054 +++$+++ 282054 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.161297960E09 +++$+++ I ask you the same question regarding the Extinction article.  +++$+++ :I ask you the same question regarding the Extinction article. [[User:Joelr31|Joelito]] ([[User talk:Joelr31|talk]]) 15:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

282056 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-19 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.161324540E09 +++$+++ Please excuse me - I have just learned how to properly insert a footnoted reference and am just going through my recent entries and attempting to fix them. Please do not hesitate to contact me again if you are not happy with the results.  +++$+++ Please excuse me - I have just learned how to properly insert a footnoted reference and am just going through my recent entries and attempting to fix them. Please do not hesitate to contact me again if you are not happy with the results. [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 23:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
282057 +++$+++ Dalbury +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282056 +++$+++ 282056 +++$+++ 2006-10-20 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.161338460E09 +++$+++ You are inserting the same reference into multiple articles about fish. References are suppoed to be sources used to write the articles. However, in [[Flounder]], for example, your insertion of the reference is the first edit you have made to the article. Your activity can be interpreted as spamming in an attempt to promote the book you are citing as a reference. Also, I notice that you have inserted references to some on-line sources by John E. Hill without any recent edits to the articles. If you are the same as that author, then you need to be mindful that such self-cites may be interpreted by some editors as vanity postings, and you need to make it clear how the references directly support the contents of the article. -- '''<font color=\"navy\"> +++$+++ :You are inserting the same reference into multiple articles about fish. References are suppoed to be sources used to write the articles. However, in [[Flounder]], for example, your insertion of the reference is the first edit you have made to the article. Your activity can be interpreted as spamming in an attempt to promote the book you are citing as a reference. Also, I notice that you have inserted references to some on-line sources by John E. Hill without any recent edits to the articles. If you are the same as that author, then you need to be mindful that such self-cites may be interpreted by some editors as vanity postings, and you need to make it clear how the references directly support the contents of the article. -- '''<font color="navy">[[User talk:Dalbury|Donald Albury]]</font>''' 03:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

544202 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544202 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-15 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.184543040E09 +++$+++ Just to let you know that your name has been mentioned on my talk page.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:SandyGeorgia#Your_comments_at_FAR]  +++$+++ Just to let you know that your name has been mentioned on my talk page.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SandyGeorgia#Your_comments_at_FAR] [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
544203 +++$+++ WAS 4.250 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544202 +++$+++ 544202 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 18:04:00 +++$+++ 1.184547840E09 +++$+++ TimVickers, Wikipedia has many mutual support groups that have different methods and goals. You have of late run into two different ones that sometimes support each other. These two groups most of the time do excellent work but are well known for winning their battles by less than policy supported means. Almost every time I see SlimVirgin et. al. critisized for their means; when I check the situation out, I find that I agree with the end result. Same too for FeloniousMonk and his friends JoshuaZ, Guettarda, and sometimes Jim62sch and KillerChihuahua. The very first time I ran into these two groups I felt very bullied; but over time I found I was able to successfully work with them. But only by biting my tongue ''a lot''. Maybe when we get stable versioning installed, wikipedia will have less need for vandal fighters and thus less need to put up with policy breaking by our vandal fighters.   +++$+++ :TimVickers, Wikipedia has many mutual support groups that have different methods and goals. You have of late run into two different ones that sometimes support each other. These two groups most of the time do excellent work but are well known for winning their battles by less than policy supported means. Almost every time I see SlimVirgin et. al. critisized for their means; when I check the situation out, I find that I agree with the end result. Same too for FeloniousMonk and his friends JoshuaZ, Guettarda, and sometimes Jim62sch and KillerChihuahua. The very first time I ran into these two groups I felt very bullied; but over time I found I was able to successfully work with them. But only by biting my tongue ''a lot''. Maybe when we get stable versioning installed, wikipedia will have less need for vandal fighters and thus less need to put up with policy breaking by our vandal fighters.  [[User:WAS 4.250|WAS 4.250]] 18:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
544204 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544202 +++$+++ 544203 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.184548380E09 +++$+++ Wouldn't life be so much simpler if all we did was write articles.  +++$+++ ::Wouldn't life be so much simpler if all we did was write articles. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 18:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
544205 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544202 +++$+++ 544204 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.184549280E09 +++$+++ Maybe that's the best thing to do now, Tim.  I'm terribly sorry that your name was invoked (not that anyone's name should have been, but you and I have barely even interacted)\u2014you were probably rolled into that only because I defended you at the administrators' noticeboards.  I hope you'll just write another featured article and forget all of this.  And I truly admire how you've handled all of this; I hope I can be like you when I grow up. One other piece of sad news (I am really sorry to have be the bearer of such bad tidings); FeloniousMonk also posted that content to the [[Intelligent design]] featured article review.  Since you've interacted with many of the editors of that article, I would think they wouldn't believe those things about you, but they do appear to have believed them about me.   +++$+++ :::Maybe that's the best thing to do now, Tim.  I'm terribly sorry that your name was invoked (not that anyone's name should have been, but you and I have barely even interacted)—you were probably rolled into that only because I defended you at the administrators' noticeboards.  I hope you'll just write another featured article and forget all of this.  And I truly admire how you've handled all of this; I hope I can be like you when I grow up. One other piece of sad news (I am really sorry to have be the bearer of such bad tidings); FeloniousMonk also posted that content to the [[Intelligent design]] featured article review.  Since you've interacted with many of the editors of that article, I would think they wouldn't believe those things about you, but they do appear to have believed them about me.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

19918 +++$+++ JasterMereel +++$+++ Joel7687 +++$+++ 19918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-30 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.185828960E09 +++$+++ Please don't correct spelling of a Welsh Article to American English - Lead is the correct spelling in British English! <sup> +++$+++ Please don't correct spelling of a Welsh Article to American English - Lead is the correct spelling in British English! <sup>[[User:JasterMereel|lɘɘяɘM яɘɫƨɐƮ ]]</sup> 13:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
19919 +++$+++ JasterMereel +++$+++ Joel7687 +++$+++ 19918 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-06 08:33:00 +++$+++ 1.186414380E09 +++$+++ Sorry - 'Mia Culpa' - Lead is correct except for The Simple Past Tense and the Past Participle...I bow to the greater authority of the OED ... Isn't English a wonderful language, (once described to me as not so much a list of rules but a list of exceptions) Irregular verbs are the ones that catch out even us native speakers... what home have EFL students got? <sup> +++$+++ :: Sorry - 'Mia Culpa' - Lead is correct except for The Simple Past Tense and the Past Participle...I bow to the greater authority of the OED ... Isn't English a wonderful language, (once described to me as not so much a list of rules but a list of exceptions) Irregular verbs are the ones that catch out even us native speakers... what home have EFL students got? <sup>[[User:JasterMereel|lɘɘяɘM яɘɫƨɐƮ ]]</sup> 08:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

544207 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544207 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-16 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.184580420E09 +++$+++ I was also shocked to read some of the recent postings here, and their connected posts elsewhere.  The policy stuff seems over my head, but the poor powers I have to sway a debate, make peace or inspire faith in you are at your service; please reach out if you're in need.  As you say, why don't we all just write articles and get on with it?  I'm not sure whether people realize the magnitude of their task, how long a road lies ahead, how little behind. :(  +++$+++ I was also shocked to read some of the recent postings here, and their connected posts elsewhere.  The policy stuff seems over my head, but the poor powers I have to sway a debate, make peace or inspire faith in you are at your service; please reach out if you're in need.  As you say, why don't we all just write articles and get on with it?  I'm not sure whether people realize the magnitude of their task, how long a road lies ahead, how little behind. :( [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 03:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
544208 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544207 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.184581020E09 +++$+++ I also agree with WillowW. We have made a bit of a dent, but there is still so very very much more to do. If you look at the number of GAs and FAs, it is pretty embarassing, compared to something like the [[Encyclopedia Britannica]]. Some of our articles are very sad, and the amount of effort required to clean them up is like cleaning out the Stygian stables! We have a long long way to go. I think we will get there, but we don't need to waste more of our meagre energies on silly disputes that are basically meaningless. I do not know what sides exist, and I do not think I want to know. It is all too much for me. -- +++$+++ ::I also agree with WillowW. We have made a bit of a dent, but there is still so very very much more to do. If you look at the number of GAs and FAs, it is pretty embarassing, compared to something like the [[Encyclopedia Britannica]]. Some of our articles are very sad, and the amount of effort required to clean them up is like cleaning out the Stygian stables! We have a long long way to go. I think we will get there, but we don't need to waste more of our meagre energies on silly disputes that are basically meaningless. I do not know what sides exist, and I do not think I want to know. It is all too much for me. --[[User:Filll|Filll]] 03:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

544209 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-16 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.184624880E09 +++$+++ BTW: I posted a similar request to prose guru [[User:Tony1|Tony]], but I think he was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:SandyGeorgia&diff=prev&oldid=144940394 tripping on magic mushrooms last night] :-).  +++$+++ BTW: I posted a similar request to prose guru [[User:Tony1|Tony]], but I think he was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SandyGeorgia&diff=prev&oldid=144940394 tripping on magic mushrooms last night] :-). [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
544210 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544209 +++$+++ 544209 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.184629740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments and for tweaking the lead. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks for your comments and for tweaking the lead. Cheers, [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

602967 +++$+++ Sherif9282 +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 602967 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-16 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.266370740E09 +++$+++ Yes it is mentioned in the section on the Rashidun Army, although it does not mention when. I think it is more appropriate and better for the reader if that piece of information is mentioned in the Prelude, since that section deals with with the capture of Emessa. -- +++$+++ Yes it is mentioned in the section on the Rashidun Army, although it does not mention when. I think it is more appropriate and better for the reader if that piece of information is mentioned in the Prelude, since that section deals with with the capture of Emessa. --[[User:Sherif9282|Sherif9282]] ([[User talk:Sherif9282|talk]]) 17:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
602968 +++$+++ Sherif9282 +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 602967 +++$+++ 602967 +++$+++ 2010-02-16 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.266383700E09 +++$+++ You know what, if you'd like to implement any changes please do so. I think I'll take note of any issues with the article and present them all at once during the review. (if I will make a review; don't hang any expectations on me!) Regards. -- +++$+++ :You know what, if you'd like to implement any changes please do so. I think I'll take note of any issues with the article and present them all at once during the review. (if I will make a review; don't hang any expectations on me!) Regards. --[[User:Sherif9282|Sherif9282]] ([[User talk:Sherif9282|talk]]) 21:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

282067 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 07:21:00 +++$+++ 1.163344860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 07:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
282068 +++$+++ Jwinius +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282067 +++$+++ 282067 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.163375040E09 +++$+++ Hope this answers your questions. You can reply here, though, since I've got your talk page on my watchlist for the time being. Cheers, -- +++$+++ :Hope this answers your questions. You can reply here, though, since I've got your talk page on my watchlist for the time being. Cheers, --[[User:Jwinius|Jwinius]] 15:44, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

265465 +++$+++ TenOfAllTrades +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265465 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-19 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.161245280E09 +++$+++ With the agreement of Nishkid64, I have lifted the protection of your user page.  You may remove any content from it that you deem objectionable, including the sockpuppeteer template.  Please take care to be civil in your edit summaries and avoid getting involved in a revert war &ndash; even when you believe that the other party or parties are in error &ndash; and seek an outside opinion (on, for example, the administrator's noticeboard) if you are concerned about the application of Wikipedia policies.  +++$+++ With the agreement of Nishkid64, I have lifted the protection of your user page.  You may remove any content from it that you deem objectionable, including the sockpuppeteer template.  Please take care to be civil in your edit summaries and avoid getting involved in a revert war &ndash; even when you believe that the other party or parties are in error &ndash; and seek an outside opinion (on, for example, the administrator's noticeboard) if you are concerned about the application of Wikipedia policies. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 01:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
265466 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265465 +++$+++ 265465 +++$+++ 2006-10-19 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.161246240E09 +++$+++ I apologize, Mattisse, if it seemed I was going against you on this issue. I had a different understand of the applications of the sockpuppetry tag and I guess that's why I reverted your page. As stated in the protection log, I only temporarily protected the page because I did not want the situation to escalate any further that it would result in a block made by another admin. Again, I'm sorry for this.  +++$+++ :I apologize, Mattisse, if it seemed I was going against you on this issue. I had a different understand of the applications of the sockpuppetry tag and I guess that's why I reverted your page. As stated in the protection log, I only temporarily protected the page because I did not want the situation to escalate any further that it would result in a block made by another admin. Again, I'm sorry for this. [[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">'''Nish'''</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">'''kid'''</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">'''64'''</span>]] 01:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

19928 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ Joel7687 +++$+++ 19928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-20 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.277037960E09 +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice -->  +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 05:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
19929 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Joel7687 +++$+++ 19928 +++$+++ 19928 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.295992980E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 14:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

282074 +++$+++ Debivort +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-18 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.166439720E09 +++$+++ Hi, Thanks for adding a new image to the buprestid article. You might want to consult with others on the talk page before replacing a previous image though. I'm going to move all the images into a gallery, byt the way, as the number is getting a bit out of hand.  +++$+++ Hi, Thanks for adding a new image to the buprestid article. You might want to consult with others on the talk page before replacing a previous image though. I'm going to move all the images into a gallery, byt the way, as the number is getting a bit out of hand. [[User:Debivort|Debivort]] 03:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
282075 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282074 +++$+++ 282074 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.166446020E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your welcome note and pointing out that I had removed an earlier image. That was totally unintended - I am not sure now how it happened but I had some trouble getting images to sit well on the page and it must have occurred while I was doing this. Oops! Thanks so much for restoring it!!!  +++$+++ :Thank you for your welcome note and pointing out that I had removed an earlier image. That was totally unintended - I am not sure now how it happened but I had some trouble getting images to sit well on the page and it must have occurred while I was doing this. Oops! Thanks so much for restoring it!!! [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 04:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
282076 +++$+++ Debivort +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282074 +++$+++ 282075 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.166446260E09 +++$+++ No problem! Hopefully the gallery will solve our layout problems too.   +++$+++ :: No problem! Hopefully the gallery will solve our layout problems too.  [[User:Debivort|Debivort]] 04:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

19931 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19931 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-01 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.291262160E09 +++$+++ There is nothing at all wrong in accepting the comment from a living person that is over a disputed single day, in fact we should support that living persons good faith comment instead of resisting it.  +++$+++ There is nothing at all wrong in accepting the comment from a living person that is over a disputed single day, in fact we should support that living persons good faith comment instead of resisting it. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 19:56, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
19932 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19931 +++$+++ 19931 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.291263180E09 +++$+++ We don't let people write their autobiographies here, and we don't throw [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] in the rubbish because a subject says something. That said it would be ok to accept ''also'' the comment, but it is not OK to remove other sources and discussions. -- +++$+++ :We don't let people write their autobiographies here, and we don't throw [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] in the rubbish because a subject says something. That said it would be ok to accept ''also'' the comment, but it is not OK to remove other sources and discussions. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:13, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
19933 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19931 +++$+++ 19932 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.291263480E09 +++$+++ We do listen to living people BLP is all about that. Jimmy has clearly stated he prefers the pointy issue is removed and I usually support living people in such issues. Its pointy to insist on adding the issue about a single day when the living person has made it clear it is the seventh.  +++$+++ ::We do listen to living people BLP is all about that. Jimmy has clearly stated he prefers the pointy issue is removed and I usually support living people in such issues. Its pointy to insist on adding the issue about a single day when the living person has made it clear it is the seventh. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 20:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
19934 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19931 +++$+++ 19933 +++$+++ 2010-12-01 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.291263840E09 +++$+++ BLP is all about making sure that living people are covered objectively and without libelous statements. I am firmly opposed to having people modulate their bios to their preference, and [[WP:COI|the same think]] our [[WP:AUTOBIO|guidelines]]. Jimbo is no exception to this rule. Now, please move this discussion to the appropriate article talk page. Thanks. -- +++$+++ :::BLP is all about making sure that living people are covered objectively and without libelous statements. I am firmly opposed to having people modulate their bios to their preference, and [[WP:COI|the same think]] our [[WP:AUTOBIO|guidelines]]. Jimbo is no exception to this rule. Now, please move this discussion to the appropriate article talk page. Thanks. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 20:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

282077 +++$+++ LRBurdak +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282077 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.167745080E09 +++$+++ Hi John Hill, [[NPOV]] should be maintained. There may be modifications as per that policy. But you have deleted '''Physical features''' section which I could not understand. When you describe an object you have to write as it is. If nose is long you have to write that. If they are strong in physique you have to write that. What is racial feature here in describing a group of people whom British called '''[[Martial Race]]'''. When it is a race you have to write that. Physical features is one of criteria to study a race. I think it may added to the article.  +++$+++ Hi John Hill, [[NPOV]] should be maintained. There may be modifications as per that policy. But you have deleted '''Physical features''' section which I could not understand. When you describe an object you have to write as it is. If nose is long you have to write that. If they are strong in physique you have to write that. What is racial feature here in describing a group of people whom British called '''[[Martial Race]]'''. When it is a race you have to write that. Physical features is one of criteria to study a race. I think it may added to the article. [[User:LRBurdak|burdak]] 05:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
282078 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282077 +++$+++ 282077 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.167777240E09 +++$+++ Further, there was a long quote from a Dr. Birereton (with no proper references given) which was extremely simplistic and full of generalizations. Worse, it was very insulting of Jat people. Comments such as: \"Their intellectual facilities are not brilliant partaking more of shrewedness and cunning than ability\" and \"The Jat women are of very strong physique exceeding man in this respect proportionately speaking. They are not remarkable for personal beauty . . .\" These are outrageous  generalizations mainly demonstrating the prejudices of Dr. Birereton and have no place in a serious reference work.  +++$+++ : Further, there was a long quote from a Dr. Birereton (with no proper references given) which was extremely simplistic and full of generalizations. Worse, it was very insulting of Jat people. Comments such as: "Their intellectual facilities are not brilliant partaking more of shrewedness and cunning than ability" and "The Jat women are of very strong physique exceeding man in this respect proportionately speaking. They are not remarkable for personal beauty . . ." These are outrageous  generalizations mainly demonstrating the prejudices of Dr. Birereton and have no place in a serious reference work. [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 14:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

544222 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-19 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.184899620E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ Regards, [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] 19:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
544223 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544222 +++$+++ 544222 +++$+++ 2007-07-19 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.184900280E09 +++$+++ OK. I'll give it a shot but I'll require a few days. In the meantime, is there any recommended wiki-reading to give me a backdrop to judge against. +++$+++ :OK. I'll give it a shot but I'll require a few days. In the meantime, is there any recommended wiki-reading to give me a backdrop to judge against.[[User:AshLin|AshLin]] 19:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

19935 +++$+++ Wnt +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-02 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.291342020E09 +++$+++ I didn't realize that Arbcom elections had come up [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2010\/Candidates] - I was curious if you have any ideas regarding who are the best candidates for inclusionism and transparency?  +++$+++ I didn't realize that Arbcom elections had come up [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2010/Candidates] - I was curious if you have any ideas regarding who are the best candidates for inclusionism and transparency? [[User:Wnt|Wnt]] ([[User talk:Wnt|talk]]) 18:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
19936 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19935 +++$+++ 19935 +++$+++ 2010-12-02 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.291342860E09 +++$+++ Heh, I'd like to have the same advice as well! I voted there, but I don't have hard facts -here go my suggestions I would for sure exclude SirFozzie, Iridescent, Off2riorob and Balloonman: with different nuances, they are the usual kind of deletionist\/BLP diehard people. GiacomoReturned is a controversial editor and I personally don't like him -but I had little interaction. I suspect the best in such regard is Jclemens, who is also an ARS member and wrote neat essays like [[Wikipedia:Crying \"BLP!\"]]. I would strongly support him. I've always had pleasant interactions with Xeno, even when disagreeing. Others, I really don't know -I've interacted with Newyorkbrad, Casliber etc. but I don't remember enough to give an impression. If you have feedback from other people, let me know :) -- +++$+++ :Heh, I'd like to have the same advice as well! I voted there, but I don't have hard facts -here go my suggestions I would for sure exclude SirFozzie, Iridescent, Off2riorob and Balloonman: with different nuances, they are the usual kind of deletionist/BLP diehard people. GiacomoReturned is a controversial editor and I personally don't like him -but I had little interaction. I suspect the best in such regard is Jclemens, who is also an ARS member and wrote neat essays like [[Wikipedia:Crying "BLP!"]]. I would strongly support him. I've always had pleasant interactions with Xeno, even when disagreeing. Others, I really don't know -I've interacted with Newyorkbrad, Casliber etc. but I don't remember enough to give an impression. If you have feedback from other people, let me know :) --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 18:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

19937 +++$+++ DMSBel +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19937 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-07 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.291776420E09 +++$+++ The only reason a few of my comments appear with an IP address is that I occasionally forget to login. I have always made it clear that what my IP and Username are.  +++$+++ The only reason a few of my comments appear with an IP address is that I occasionally forget to login. I have always made it clear that what my IP and Username are. [[User:DMSBel|DMSBel]] ([[User talk:DMSBel|talk]]) 18:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
19938 +++$+++ DMacks +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19937 +++$+++ 19937 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.291790760E09 +++$+++ I suspect there may be mis-reading\/confusion between the similar account-names \"DMSBel\" and \"Bdell555\"? Repeatedly not logging in makes it pretty easy for me as a reader to question whether there may actually be other identities rather than a specific and unique attribution for comments.  +++$+++ :I suspect there may be mis-reading/confusion between the similar account-names "DMSBel" and "Bdell555"? Repeatedly not logging in makes it pretty easy for me as a reader to question whether there may actually be other identities rather than a specific and unique attribution for comments. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 22:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
19939 +++$+++ DMSBel +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19937 +++$+++ 19938 +++$+++ 2010-12-07 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.291791600E09 +++$+++ I think it is fairly clear Bdell555 and myself (DMSBel 62.254.133.139) are two separate users. If that was the confusion Cyclopia needs to say so here and then edit his comment on the discussion page of Ejaculation. However that he has refered there to IP socks, I suspect he is refering to my IP number which appeared when I had forgotten to log in. I have in the past linked my IP address with my username in comments so that there would be no grounds for accusation of sock-puppetry - who using a sock-puppet account would do that? Whether or not he agrees with me regarding deletion of the images, is one thing. Accusations of sock-puppetry are quite another (see [[WP:AGF]]).  +++$+++ ::I think it is fairly clear Bdell555 and myself (DMSBel 62.254.133.139) are two separate users. If that was the confusion Cyclopia needs to say so here and then edit his comment on the discussion page of Ejaculation. However that he has refered there to IP socks, I suspect he is refering to my IP number which appeared when I had forgotten to log in. I have in the past linked my IP address with my username in comments so that there would be no grounds for accusation of sock-puppetry - who using a sock-puppet account would do that? Whether or not he agrees with me regarding deletion of the images, is one thing. Accusations of sock-puppetry are quite another (see [[WP:AGF]]). [[User:DMSBel|DMSBel]] ([[User talk:DMSBel|talk]]) 23:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
19940 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19937 +++$+++ 19939 +++$+++ 2010-12-08 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.291797420E09 +++$+++ I stopped assuming good faith long ago with you. However it's true that I have no proof currently that you have IP sockpuppets, therefore I gladly apologize for the insinuation. -- +++$+++ :::I stopped assuming good faith long ago with you. However it's true that I have no proof currently that you have IP sockpuppets, therefore I gladly apologize for the insinuation. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 00:37, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
19941 +++$+++ DMSBel +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19937 +++$+++ 19940 +++$+++ 2010-12-08 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.291838160E09 +++$+++ Thats fine thanks for the apology. I am withdrawing from editing as having considered the current state wikipedia is in after reading some external links, I think I do not wish to invest any more time or effort in the experiment. I have had doubts about the wikipedia experiment that are fundamental and related to its nature as a user-edited encyclopedia and how it works. I have no illusions about what it limits and weaknesses are. A fundamental problem is people taking either exclusively inclusionist or deletionist positions, and allowing that to guide their judgements, and the failure to understand what is censorship and what is not. I also find editing it stressful and frustrating, I cannot endure this kind of online culture. I am strongly of the view that encyclopedic sexual content should not be photographic, but rather sketched, or drawn and clinical in tone. Too many editors within wikipedia are now out of touch and conditioned by wikipedia content. I suspect prolonged participation in wikipedia's \"culture\" is detrimental to intelligence, judgement and  mental health.   +++$+++ ::::Thats fine thanks for the apology. I am withdrawing from editing as having considered the current state wikipedia is in after reading some external links, I think I do not wish to invest any more time or effort in the experiment. I have had doubts about the wikipedia experiment that are fundamental and related to its nature as a user-edited encyclopedia and how it works. I have no illusions about what it limits and weaknesses are. A fundamental problem is people taking either exclusively inclusionist or deletionist positions, and allowing that to guide their judgements, and the failure to understand what is censorship and what is not. I also find editing it stressful and frustrating, I cannot endure this kind of online culture. I am strongly of the view that encyclopedic sexual content should not be photographic, but rather sketched, or drawn and clinical in tone. Too many editors within wikipedia are now out of touch and conditioned by wikipedia content. I suspect prolonged participation in wikipedia's "culture" is detrimental to intelligence, judgement and  mental health.  [[User:DMSBel|DMSBel]] ([[User talk:DMSBel|talk]]) 11:56, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

282082 +++$+++ Larry_Rosenfeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-01 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.170352860E09 +++$+++ <p>This wasn't an easy choice for me and I'd be happy to discuss this further with you.  Whether your inclined to discuss it further or not, I'd like to simply thank you again for your sharing your wonderful experiences and wisdom.  Best regards,  +++$+++ <p>This wasn't an easy choice for me and I'd be happy to discuss this further with you.  Whether your inclined to discuss it further or not, I'd like to simply thank you again for your sharing your wonderful experiences and wisdom.  Best regards, [[User:Larry_Rosenfeld|Larry Rosenfeld]] ([[User_talk:Larry_Rosenfeld|talk]]) 10:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
282083 +++$+++ Larry_Rosenfeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282082 +++$+++ 282082 +++$+++ 2007-02-02 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.170459900E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your thoughtful understanding and kindness.  In addition to your inspiring experiences and obvious intellect, you have a good heart.  Best wishes,  +++$+++ :Thank you for your thoughtful understanding and kindness.  In addition to your inspiring experiences and obvious intellect, you have a good heart.  Best wishes, [[User:Larry_Rosenfeld|Larry Rosenfeld]] ([[User_talk:Larry_Rosenfeld|talk]]) 15:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
282084 +++$+++ LRBurdak +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282082 +++$+++ 282082 +++$+++ 2007-02-10 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.171103760E09 +++$+++ Dear John Hill, Thanks  for the action of restoring the deleted content from Jat talk page. It is OK. +++$+++ :Dear John Hill, Thanks  for the action of restoring the deleted content from Jat talk page. It is OK.[[User:LRBurdak|burdak]] 02:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

282085 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282085 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.171613100E09 +++$+++ I admit I don't know anything about the subject so I'm not good at referencing these articles. I'm copy editing a bunch of articles on Indian history for FA applications and so sometimes I try to upgrade the articles they link to so the FA application will stand a better chance. Also, sometimes I'm trying to understand enough to copy edit accurately. Maybe this is the wrong article anyhow -- I can't tell. The only book I have refers to Yueh-chi so the editor of the FA candidate maybe doesn't mean this article.  An Asian tribe that invaded India?  Sincerely,  +++$+++ I admit I don't know anything about the subject so I'm not good at referencing these articles. I'm copy editing a bunch of articles on Indian history for FA applications and so sometimes I try to upgrade the articles they link to so the FA application will stand a better chance. Also, sometimes I'm trying to understand enough to copy edit accurately. Maybe this is the wrong article anyhow -- I can't tell. The only book I have refers to Yueh-chi so the editor of the FA candidate maybe doesn't mean this article.  An Asian tribe that invaded India?  Sincerely, [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 00:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
282086 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282085 +++$+++ 282085 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.171706160E09 +++$+++ {I just looked at the article's history and what I added was a tag that said it needed intext references. Not that I'm defensive or anything!) <nowiki>{{nofootnote|article}}<\/nowiki> puts a banner across the top of your page. It looks like an interesting article and I will read it. Thanks for the message and for being interested! From looking at your user page, it seems like we have several things in common.  Sincerely,   +++$+++ :{I just looked at the article's history and what I added was a tag that said it needed intext references. Not that I'm defensive or anything!) <nowiki>{{nofootnote|article}}</nowiki> puts a banner across the top of your page. It looks like an interesting article and I will read it. Thanks for the message and for being interested! From looking at your user page, it seems like we have several things in common.  Sincerely,  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 01:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
282087 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282085 +++$+++ 282086 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.171706460E09 +++$+++ P.S. [[Black Seminoles]] is a FA I notice!   +++$+++ ::P.S. [[Black Seminoles]] is a FA I notice!  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] 02:01, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

19942 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-12 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.292165400E09 +++$+++ On the contrary, we remove sensitive information all the time when it comes to BLP's, such as [[WP:WELLKNOWN]], [[WP:DOB]], [[WP:BLPNAME]], and [[WP:NPF]]. As for using primary sources to write articles about non-BLP's, that generally falls under [[WP:NOR]].  The question then becomes, is WikiLeaks a reliable source for stolen primary source documents?  Regardless of what you think the answer is, it does not fall under the standard model of a RS.  +++$+++ On the contrary, we remove sensitive information all the time when it comes to BLP's, such as [[WP:WELLKNOWN]], [[WP:DOB]], [[WP:BLPNAME]], and [[WP:NPF]]. As for using primary sources to write articles about non-BLP's, that generally falls under [[WP:NOR]].  The question then becomes, is WikiLeaks a reliable source for stolen primary source documents?  Regardless of what you think the answer is, it does not fall under the standard model of a RS. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 06:50, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19943 +++$+++ Meco +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19942 +++$+++ 19942 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.292177940E09 +++$+++ Since you mention the use of stolen documents, I will mention that this has been profusely discussed on the talk page of [[Climatic Research Unit email controversy]] also and surely on many other Wikipedia forums in connection with that controversy. __ +++$+++ :Since you mention the use of stolen documents, I will mention that this has been profusely discussed on the talk page of [[Climatic Research Unit email controversy]] also and surely on many other Wikipedia forums in connection with that controversy. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 10:19, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19944 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19942 +++$+++ 19943 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 11:43:00 +++$+++ 1.292182980E09 +++$+++ You don't say?  Tell me, my good friend and talk page stalker, why isn't there a ''single link to a leaked document'' in that article?  Why doesn't that article rely on stolen, leaked, e-mails, charts, graphs, or documents?  +++$+++ ::You don't say?  Tell me, my good friend and talk page stalker, why isn't there a ''single link to a leaked document'' in that article?  Why doesn't that article rely on stolen, leaked, e-mails, charts, graphs, or documents? [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 11:43, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19945 +++$+++ Meco +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19942 +++$+++ 19944 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.292183700E09 +++$+++ See [[User talk:Viriditas#Please abstain from personal attacks]] ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Viriditas&oldid=401940495]). __ +++$+++ :::See [[User talk:Viriditas#Please abstain from personal attacks]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Viriditas&oldid=401940495]). __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 11:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19946 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19942 +++$+++ 19945 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.292183820E09 +++$+++ It's not a personal attack.  You might want to familiarize yourself with [[Wikipedia:Talk page stalker]].  +++$+++ ::::It's not a personal attack.  You might want to familiarize yourself with [[Wikipedia:Talk page stalker]]. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 11:57, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

282089 +++$+++ Tibetologist +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282089 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.172265600E09 +++$+++ It is normal practice in history to more ore less disregard hagiographic material that was compiled several centuries after the events described. It is not clear to my why this standard should be relaxed in Tibetan studies. While of course this material will contain some true material not found elsewhere it takes a lot of spade work to figure out what these nuggets of historicity are, and after all Wikipedia is not the place for orignal research. The Samye debates are a good example. No debate occured, and nothing occured at Samye. There was no winner and no loser, and Chinese style Buddhism (whatever that might be) was never surpressed in Tibet. Hoshan Mahayana was a real person, and was involved in scholarly discussion with his contemporaries. Some details e.g. the Nepali wife, are clearly made up, for starters her name Brkhuti (sp?) is the name of Avalokitesvara's second consort. Clearly someone thought along these lines -- Avalokitesvara is Songts\xe4n Gampo, therefore Wencheng must be Tara and there must have been a second wife who was Nepalese named Brkhuti.  +++$+++ It is normal practice in history to more ore less disregard hagiographic material that was compiled several centuries after the events described. It is not clear to my why this standard should be relaxed in Tibetan studies. While of course this material will contain some true material not found elsewhere it takes a lot of spade work to figure out what these nuggets of historicity are, and after all Wikipedia is not the place for orignal research. The Samye debates are a good example. No debate occured, and nothing occured at Samye. There was no winner and no loser, and Chinese style Buddhism (whatever that might be) was never surpressed in Tibet. Hoshan Mahayana was a real person, and was involved in scholarly discussion with his contemporaries. Some details e.g. the Nepali wife, are clearly made up, for starters her name Brkhuti (sp?) is the name of Avalokitesvara's second consort. Clearly someone thought along these lines -- Avalokitesvara is Songtsän Gampo, therefore Wencheng must be Tara and there must have been a second wife who was Nepalese named Brkhuti. [[User:Tibetologist|Tibetologist]] 13:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
282090 +++$+++ Tibetologist +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282089 +++$+++ 282089 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.172686980E09 +++$+++ The Songts\xe4n Gampo article is looking much better. The Yeshe de project is a disaster though, and should be avoided as a source, e.g. why say 'some Dunhuang documents' when you could say 'the Old Tibetan Chronicle'. Also, if you are looking for a translation of the Tang Annals Pelliot's version is regarded as being much more accurate than Bushell's. But I cant read Chinese so who am I to say.  +++$+++ : The Songtsän Gampo article is looking much better. The Yeshe de project is a disaster though, and should be avoided as a source, e.g. why say 'some Dunhuang documents' when you could say 'the Old Tibetan Chronicle'. Also, if you are looking for a translation of the Tang Annals Pelliot's version is regarded as being much more accurate than Bushell's. But I cant read Chinese so who am I to say. [[User:Tibetologist|Tibetologist]] 10:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

19947 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-12 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.292184060E09 +++$+++ {{ec}}{{od}}Viriditas, do you read what you link? [[WP:WELLKNOWN]] says exactly the opposite, that we '''do not''' censor negative information if it is well sourced. For the rest ,yes, these are among the ''few and only'' cases where we exercise restraint, and we had to write a narrow policy to make that clear, because it is a big exeception with respect to the standard. And such exceptions regard what is usually information of very minor importance, like personal names of minor characters, not whole documented facts or events. But in any case, sensitive sites are not BLPs , so what you link is nice but has no bearing on the discussion. You refer to the Anarchist cookbook: well, yes, we host description on how atomic weapons are made, we host the chemical synthesis of drugs and we even have a [[List of suicide methods]]. Because if documents say something, it is not only ridicolous to put fingers in our ears and sing \"lalala\" while meantime that \"something\" is planetary knowledge disseminated everywhere: it is also a profound disservice and dishonesty to our readers.  And no, using a primary source is not OR ''per se'', [[WP:PRIMARY]] makes it very clear, if you just report objectively what it's in the primary source itself. Novel plots are an example of that. Finally: why are you telling me that here? This should be discussed in the AN\/I thread, not privately. -- +++$+++ {{ec}}{{od}}Viriditas, do you read what you link? [[WP:WELLKNOWN]] says exactly the opposite, that we '''do not''' censor negative information if it is well sourced. For the rest ,yes, these are among the ''few and only'' cases where we exercise restraint, and we had to write a narrow policy to make that clear, because it is a big exeception with respect to the standard. And such exceptions regard what is usually information of very minor importance, like personal names of minor characters, not whole documented facts or events. But in any case, sensitive sites are not BLPs , so what you link is nice but has no bearing on the discussion. You refer to the Anarchist cookbook: well, yes, we host description on how atomic weapons are made, we host the chemical synthesis of drugs and we even have a [[List of suicide methods]]. Because if documents say something, it is not only ridicolous to put fingers in our ears and sing "lalala" while meantime that "something" is planetary knowledge disseminated everywhere: it is also a profound disservice and dishonesty to our readers.  And no, using a primary source is not OR ''per se'', [[WP:PRIMARY]] makes it very clear, if you just report objectively what it's in the primary source itself. Novel plots are an example of that. Finally: why are you telling me that here? This should be discussed in the AN/I thread, not privately. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 12:01, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19948 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19947 +++$+++ 19947 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 12:09:00 +++$+++ 1.292184540E09 +++$+++ I thought you might miss the connection.  WELLKNOWN is only one of many examples of the policies in action that contradicts your opinion. It says that we rely on a ''multitude of reliable published sources'', IOW, not primary sources.  Those sources must also report on a topic that is notable, relevant, and well-documented, i.e. not a primary source. These are not exceptions for BLP's, in fact, this is how we use primary sources, very carefully, if at all, and usually only when it is not controversial or sensitive.  I am telling you this here, because when we communicate with a user, we use their talk page.  In any case, please answer the question posed above: Why don't we link to and discuss the stolen, leaked e-mails and documents on the Climatic Research Unit email controversy page?  The answer is simple.  We don't write articles based on primary sources.  You are, in fact, encouraging people to misuse primary sources, which is a Bad Thing.  +++$+++ :I thought you might miss the connection.  WELLKNOWN is only one of many examples of the policies in action that contradicts your opinion. It says that we rely on a ''multitude of reliable published sources'', IOW, not primary sources.  Those sources must also report on a topic that is notable, relevant, and well-documented, i.e. not a primary source. These are not exceptions for BLP's, in fact, this is how we use primary sources, very carefully, if at all, and usually only when it is not controversial or sensitive.  I am telling you this here, because when we communicate with a user, we use their talk page.  In any case, please answer the question posed above: Why don't we link to and discuss the stolen, leaked e-mails and documents on the Climatic Research Unit email controversy page?  The answer is simple.  We don't write articles based on primary sources.  You are, in fact, encouraging people to misuse primary sources, which is a Bad Thing. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 12:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19949 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19947 +++$+++ 19948 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.292184840E09 +++$+++ {{ec}}I asked for this to be on AN\/I because it related to the whole thread. Anyway, again: this is specific, narrow, exceptional BLP policy. It is an exception, otherwise it wouldn't be called \"BLP policy\" but \"subject-wide policy\". For example, about sensitive primary sources: we actually publish the original images -a primary source themselves- of the [[Rorschach test]]. This despite there have been concerns, even by public health officers, that such publication is dangerous because it makes one of the most important psychological tests potentially useless. Guess what? Several multiple RfCs on the subject firmly rejected censorship of such images. Now, if you want a restrictive policy to apply to leaked documents, start a RfC and seek consensus, it would be much more productive than chatting with me. You're not going to convince me on that, and citing me BLP policy is nonsensical when dealing with non-BLPs. You're encouraging censorship, and this is a '''worse thing'''. (About the emails, I don't know because I wouldn't touch climate change articles with a kilometer-long stick, given the editing hell within them: but I suspect in ''that'' case there are BLP concerns -them being private documents of living people, for example- that here do not arise).  -- +++$+++ ::{{ec}}I asked for this to be on AN/I because it related to the whole thread. Anyway, again: this is specific, narrow, exceptional BLP policy. It is an exception, otherwise it wouldn't be called "BLP policy" but "subject-wide policy". For example, about sensitive primary sources: we actually publish the original images -a primary source themselves- of the [[Rorschach test]]. This despite there have been concerns, even by public health officers, that such publication is dangerous because it makes one of the most important psychological tests potentially useless. Guess what? Several multiple RfCs on the subject firmly rejected censorship of such images. Now, if you want a restrictive policy to apply to leaked documents, start a RfC and seek consensus, it would be much more productive than chatting with me. You're not going to convince me on that, and citing me BLP policy is nonsensical when dealing with non-BLPs. You're encouraging censorship, and this is a '''worse thing'''. (About the emails, I don't know because I wouldn't touch climate change articles with a kilometer-long stick, given the editing hell within them: but I suspect in ''that'' case there are BLP concerns -them being private documents of living people, for example- that here do not arise).  --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 12:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19950 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19947 +++$+++ 19949 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.292185260E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but you are mistaken.  I have 90,000 edits and I've never once encouraged censorship on any topic.  You are free to find ''one''.  What I am encouraging is the use of secondary sources, good ones, for all of our articles, and that encouragement stems from our best practices ''inherent'' in all aspects of the policies, from BLP to NOR, and more.  You seem to think that the limitation on using primary sources is an exception, but it is not.  As for your claims about private documents of living people, how is that not the case in the cablegate documents?  +++$+++ :::Sorry, but you are mistaken.  I have 90,000 edits and I've never once encouraged censorship on any topic.  You are free to find ''one''.  What I am encouraging is the use of secondary sources, good ones, for all of our articles, and that encouragement stems from our best practices ''inherent'' in all aspects of the policies, from BLP to NOR, and more.  You seem to think that the limitation on using primary sources is an exception, but it is not.  As for your claims about private documents of living people, how is that not the case in the cablegate documents? [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 12:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19951 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19947 +++$+++ 19950 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.292185860E09 +++$+++ How disingenous. Your very original post here and your comparisons to the \"Anarchist cookbook\" in various threads are encouraging censorship.  Sensitive sites are not living persons and therefore are not subject to BLP policy. That said, I find this discussion unproductive. Discuss it community-wise at a RfC and seek consensus. Chatting with me, again, won't help you: I find your arguments utterly unconvincing and I am not going to change my mind if this is the best of arguments you can do. I'd close this discussion now. Thanks. -- +++$+++ ::::How disingenous. Your very original post here and your comparisons to the "Anarchist cookbook" in various threads are encouraging censorship.  Sensitive sites are not living persons and therefore are not subject to BLP policy. That said, I find this discussion unproductive. Discuss it community-wise at a RfC and seek consensus. Chatting with me, again, won't help you: I find your arguments utterly unconvincing and I am not going to change my mind if this is the best of arguments you can do. I'd close this discussion now. Thanks. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 12:31, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19952 +++$+++ Viriditas +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19947 +++$+++ 19951 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.292186340E09 +++$+++ There is already consensus on the topic.  The fact is, you and others aren't following it.  We don't base articles on primary sources.  The ''Anarchist Cookbook'' analogy is apt when we have editors picking and choosing which classified documents to write articles about after WikiLeaks decides which classified documents to release.  That isn't how the reliable source process works, and if WikiLeaks releases a document on sensitive sites that Wikipedia editors decide they should publish when secondary sources do not, then the entire sourcing process has been subverted, which is exactly what has happened.  Wikipedia editors ''do not get to choose'' what is important to publish.  +++$+++ :::::There is already consensus on the topic.  The fact is, you and others aren't following it.  We don't base articles on primary sources.  The ''Anarchist Cookbook'' analogy is apt when we have editors picking and choosing which classified documents to write articles about after WikiLeaks decides which classified documents to release.  That isn't how the reliable source process works, and if WikiLeaks releases a document on sensitive sites that Wikipedia editors decide they should publish when secondary sources do not, then the entire sourcing process has been subverted, which is exactly what has happened.  Wikipedia editors ''do not get to choose'' what is important to publish. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 12:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19953 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19947 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.292200680E09 +++$+++ Nobody is talking of basing article on primary sources. And yes, we are absolutely entitled to release content that secondary sources prefer not to publish, if it's in available reliable primary sources. See ''[[The Mousetrap]]'', where we include the play ending from primary sources (the book) even if there are little to none secondary sources publishing it. Wikipedia editors '''do get to choose''' what is important to publish, provided it's within our own guidelines and policies: we don't have any superior to answer to. Now, I close this discussion, since it's clear that nobody of us will change their mind. -- +++$+++ :::::::Nobody is talking of basing article on primary sources. And yes, we are absolutely entitled to release content that secondary sources prefer not to publish, if it's in available reliable primary sources. See ''[[The Mousetrap]]'', where we include the play ending from primary sources (the book) even if there are little to none secondary sources publishing it. Wikipedia editors '''do get to choose''' what is important to publish, provided it's within our own guidelines and policies: we don't have any superior to answer to. Now, I close this discussion, since it's clear that nobody of us will change their mind. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 16:38, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19954 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19947 +++$+++ 19947 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.292191800E09 +++$+++ The content Viriditas is referring to used to be in [[WP:WELLKNOWN]], but has now moved to [[WP:BLPPRIMARY]]: \"Exercise caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person. Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses. Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it may be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source, subject to the restrictions of this policy, no original research, and the other sourcing policies.\" Hope that clears up the miscommunication. --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ *The content Viriditas is referring to used to be in [[WP:WELLKNOWN]], but has now moved to [[WP:BLPPRIMARY]]: "Exercise caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person. Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses. Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it may be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source, subject to the restrictions of this policy, no original research, and the other sourcing policies." Hope that clears up the miscommunication. --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|JN]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 14:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19955 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19947 +++$+++ 19954 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.292200680E09 +++$+++ Thank you Jayen! Still, it doesn't change the substance. -- +++$+++ :*Thank you Jayen! Still, it doesn't change the substance. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 16:38, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

483922 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483922 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-03 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.196753040E09 +++$+++ Probable ones, at least. I leave for you to judge, sir. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Educational_toys] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Supersede] - +++$+++ Probable ones, at least. I leave for you to judge, sir. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Educational_toys] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Supersede] -[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] 23:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
483923 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483922 +++$+++ 483922 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.196756880E09 +++$+++ Definitely. Changes reverted, but Wknight94 will need to wield his light-sabr.  +++$+++ :Definitely. Changes reverted, but Wknight94 will need to wield his light-sabr. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 00:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
483924 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483922 +++$+++ 483923 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 02:40:00 +++$+++ 1.196764800E09 +++$+++ Done.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::Done.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 02:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

544240 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-24 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.185299700E09 +++$+++ Please see talk page of OP.  +++$+++ Please see talk page of OP. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] 10:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
544241 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544240 +++$+++ 544240 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.185320400E09 +++$+++ Finally, we have a GA on our hands.  +++$+++ :Finally, we have a GA on our hands. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] 16:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
544242 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544240 +++$+++ 544241 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.185514080E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've suggested a simplified lead for OP on the talk page for your consideration. Regards,  +++$+++ ::Hi, I've suggested a simplified lead for OP on the talk page for your consideration. Regards, [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] 22:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

19956 +++$+++ Atomaton +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19956 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-12 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.292195460E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Atomaton|Atom]] ([[User talk:Atomaton|talk]]) 15:11, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
19957 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19956 +++$+++ 19956 +++$+++ 2010-12-13 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.292281140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up, but I'm really not qualified to participate. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up, but I'm really not qualified to participate. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 14:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

527614 +++$+++ KarenAE +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527614 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-28 09:25:00 +++$+++ 1.177777500E09 +++$+++ Hi, It seems that [[User:Stevertigo]] is busy. He is currently meditating [[White people]] page and it seems that we need a meditator there. Should I wait for the return of [[User:Stevertigo]] or file a new meditation request or something else? Thx... +++$+++ Hi, It seems that [[User:Stevertigo]] is busy. He is currently meditating [[White people]] page and it seems that we need a meditator there. Should I wait for the return of [[User:Stevertigo]] or file a new meditation request or something else? Thx...[[User:KarenAE|KarenAE]] 09:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
527615 +++$+++ Carwil +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527614 +++$+++ 527614 +++$+++ 2007-04-29 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.177830060E09 +++$+++ [[User:Stevertigo]] was mediating a dispute between myself and [[User:Lukas19]]. In a case in which I did not participate, Lukas was banned for one year for tendentious editwarring on [[White people]] among other pages. Recent edits suggest an extreme alignment between [[User:KarenAE|KarenAE]] and [[User:Lukas19]]'s editing style, perhaps even sockpuppetry. Regardless, the mediation request is moot, though I am trying to respect the spirit of the mediation regardless.-- +++$+++ :[[User:Stevertigo]] was mediating a dispute between myself and [[User:Lukas19]]. In a case in which I did not participate, Lukas was banned for one year for tendentious editwarring on [[White people]] among other pages. Recent edits suggest an extreme alignment between [[User:KarenAE|KarenAE]] and [[User:Lukas19]]'s editing style, perhaps even sockpuppetry. Regardless, the mediation request is moot, though I am trying to respect the spirit of the mediation regardless.--[[User:Carwil|Carwil]] 00:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

19958 +++$+++ Scott MacDonald +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19958 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-26 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.293406740E09 +++$+++ I'm probably missing something here. You deprodded here with a link to a google news search. The link yields zero result for me. I'm guessing either you've made a mistake or I've screwed up somehow. Any ideas? (Oh, and Merry Christmas)-- +++$+++ I'm probably missing something here. You deprodded here with a link to a google news search. The link yields zero result for me. I'm guessing either you've made a mistake or I've screwed up somehow. Any ideas? (Oh, and Merry Christmas)--[[User talk:Scott MacDonald|Scott Mac]] 15:39, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
19959 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19958 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-26 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.293416820E09 +++$+++ in [[yubnub]] and then clicking on the archives. -- +++$+++ ::in [[yubnub]] and then clicking on the archives. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 18:27, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
19960 +++$+++ Scott MacDonald +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19958 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-26 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.293423120E09 +++$+++ OK, probably it was me. Thanks for the help getting it right. I'll take a look, and send it to AFD if I'm not satisfied. Again, thanks.-- +++$+++ :::OK, probably it was me. Thanks for the help getting it right. I'll take a look, and send it to AFD if I'm not satisfied. Again, thanks.--[[User talk:Scott MacDonald|Scott Mac]] 20:12, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

571305 +++$+++ GordonE +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-19 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.166558460E09 +++$+++ Have I missed something?  Please reply on this page.&nbsp;  +++$+++ Have I missed something?  Please reply on this page.&nbsp; [[User:GordonE|Gordon]] | [[User talk:GordonE|Talk]], 12:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
571306 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571305 +++$+++ 571305 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.166606400E09 +++$+++ Hope that helps. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Hope that helps. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|2]] . [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Dfrg.msc|Editor Review]]</sup></small> 01:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
571307 +++$+++ GordonE +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571305 +++$+++ 571306 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 10:56:00 +++$+++ 1.166640960E09 +++$+++ No worries.  You've explained it quite well.  Thanks.&nbsp;  +++$+++ ::No worries.  You've explained it quite well.  Thanks.&nbsp; [[User:GordonE|Gordon]] | [[User talk:GordonE|Talk]], 10:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
571308 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571305 +++$+++ 571307 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.166678460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your understanding and help in correcting my mistake. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc\/EA|<font color=\"green\">s<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::Thanks for your understanding and help in correcting my mistake. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.m]][[User:Dfrg.msc/EA|<font color="green">s</font>]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|2]] . [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Dfrg.msc|Editor Review]]</sup></small> 21:21, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

19961 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19961 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-04 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.294184040E09 +++$+++ Have you actually accessed those articles? Have you verified they actually are correct? Also as a note - you have three reverts on that worthless stub.  +++$+++ Have you actually accessed those articles? Have you verified they actually are correct? Also as a note - you have three reverts on that worthless stub. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 15:34, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
19962 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19961 +++$+++ 19961 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.294184400E09 +++$+++ They have been accessed by [[User:NuclearWarfare]] (the article nominator at AfD) and since I follow [[WP:AGF]] I have no reason to think they are wrong. If you are not sure you can ask him.  -- +++$+++ :They have been accessed by [[User:NuclearWarfare]] (the article nominator at AfD) and since I follow [[WP:AGF]] I have no reason to think they are wrong. If you are not sure you can ask him.  --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 15:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
19963 +++$+++ Griswaldo +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19961 +++$+++ 19962 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.294185000E09 +++$+++ The burden is on you if you are adding them to the entry not on what you assume another editor has done.  Also, please refrain from re-adding the ''Mental Illness'' as it was being misused.  When I deleted it I started a discussion at the talk page which you I note you have not engaged.  See [[Talk:Involuntary_committal_of_Victor_Gy\u0151ry#Problem_source]].  Cheers. +++$+++ ::The burden is on you if you are adding them to the entry not on what you assume another editor has done.  Also, please refrain from re-adding the ''Mental Illness'' as it was being misused.  When I deleted it I started a discussion at the talk page which you I note you have not engaged.  See [[Talk:Involuntary_committal_of_Victor_Győry#Problem_source]].  Cheers.[[User:Griswaldo|Griswaldo]] ([[User talk:Griswaldo|talk]]) 15:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
19964 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19961 +++$+++ 19963 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.294185360E09 +++$+++ I've noticed the discussion and I am going to address it. About the sources, well, I don't see why we shouldn't assume good faith for the AfD nominator, but I'm going to ask him if he can provide us a copy of the sources. -- +++$+++ :::I've noticed the discussion and I am going to address it. About the sources, well, I don't see why we shouldn't assume good faith for the AfD nominator, but I'm going to ask him if he can provide us a copy of the sources. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 15:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

524407 +++$+++ Albion moonlight +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524407 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.190190900E09 +++$+++ I am not willing to allow Mr Lindsay to control the Bailey Article. I am willing to not go after his followers  if they cease and desist from disrupting the Controversies section. I have read the section on Meat Puppets and I made a point of asking Jp Gordon if Meat Puppetry cases were ever resolved by Arb com. I am standing on very firm ground. Mr Gordons answer was yes. I do not back down from the likes of Mr Lindsay. Ok ?  : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 23:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)  +++$+++ I am not willing to allow Mr Lindsay to control the Bailey Article. I am willing to not go after his followers  if they cease and desist from disrupting the Controversies section. I have read the section on Meat Puppets and I made a point of asking Jp Gordon if Meat Puppetry cases were ever resolved by Arb com. I am standing on very firm ground. Mr Gordons answer was yes. I do not back down from the likes of Mr Lindsay. Ok ?  : [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 23:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC) [[User:Albion moonlight|Albion moonlight]] 01:35, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
524408 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524407 +++$+++ 524407 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.190184360E09 +++$+++ Whoah, whoah, whoah. I don't know what caused this, but calling someone names like that is not \"not backing down\", it's a personal attack. (Fortunately no one here claims to be Lindsay.) Please calm down and be specific what the issue is. -- +++$+++ : Whoah, whoah, whoah. I don't know what caused this, but calling someone names like that is not "not backing down", it's a personal attack. (Fortunately no one here claims to be Lindsay.) Please calm down and be specific what the issue is. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 23:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
524409 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524407 +++$+++ 524407 +++$+++ 2007-09-19 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.190185560E09 +++$+++ I admit I'm not really sure what you're talking about, maybe you could be more clear what the problem is? On the article talk page, I see [[Talk:Alice_Bailey#Isnt_Phillip_Lindsay_the_real_reaon._.3F]] which refers to a Yahoo group, in which Lindsay makes a post complaining about the Wikipedia article back in February. http:\/\/groups.yahoo.com\/group\/EsotericWisdomTeachings\/message\/72 I don't see any other reference to Wikipedia in that Yahoo group. Is this what you mean? If so, well, I can imagine it might have caused someone to edit the article, but if you're talking about James, his first edit was in May, so I doubt that  could have been the direct cause. Anyway, the reason why people showed up could be anything, the important thing is what people do when they get here. And this \"control\" thing - no one person controls much of anything here. Not even Jimbo. I've got a few extra shiny buttons, but you'll notice I do my best to avoid using them, when I can use words instead. This isn't a battleground, this is a bunch of volunteers trying to write articles together. -- +++$+++ : I admit I'm not really sure what you're talking about, maybe you could be more clear what the problem is? On the article talk page, I see [[Talk:Alice_Bailey#Isnt_Phillip_Lindsay_the_real_reaon._.3F]] which refers to a Yahoo group, in which Lindsay makes a post complaining about the Wikipedia article back in February. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EsotericWisdomTeachings/message/72 I don't see any other reference to Wikipedia in that Yahoo group. Is this what you mean? If so, well, I can imagine it might have caused someone to edit the article, but if you're talking about James, his first edit was in May, so I doubt that  could have been the direct cause. Anyway, the reason why people showed up could be anything, the important thing is what people do when they get here. And this "control" thing - no one person controls much of anything here. Not even Jimbo. I've got a few extra shiny buttons, but you'll notice I do my best to avoid using them, when I can use words instead. This isn't a battleground, this is a bunch of volunteers trying to write articles together. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 00:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

544252 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-29 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.185756780E09 +++$+++ You might of made a mistake in nominating me, I thought a user called \"Your username\" was nominating me because you must of forgot to put your username in there. Hmm  +++$+++ You might of made a mistake in nominating me, I thought a user called "Your username" was nominating me because you must of forgot to put your username in there. Hmm [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 17:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544253 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.185756840E09 +++$+++ Concerning the corrected nomination, '''I accept'''. Thank you.  +++$+++ ::Concerning the corrected nomination, '''I accept'''. Thank you. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 17:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544254 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.185756960E09 +++$+++ I believe you need to create a page here [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Wikidudeman]] so that I can answer the relevant questions etc.  +++$+++ :::I believe you need to create a page here [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Wikidudeman]] so that I can answer the relevant questions etc. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 17:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544255 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.185757620E09 +++$+++ I've answered the questions. You can make any corrections I might have made before entering it for discussion.  +++$+++ ::::I've answered the questions. You can make any corrections I might have made before entering it for discussion. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 18:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544256 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.185757860E09 +++$+++ Why are your comments in bold text?  +++$+++ ::Why are your comments in bold text? [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 18:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544257 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.185758040E09 +++$+++ Shouldn't they be? That's how it was formated when I answered, inside of the bold text signs. If it's not supposed to be like that you can remove them.  +++$+++ ::Shouldn't they be? That's how it was formated when I answered, inside of the bold text signs. If it's not supposed to be like that you can remove them. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 18:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544258 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.185758220E09 +++$+++ Looks fine to me, have you adjusted the date and time to be exactly 7 days after your acceptance (the edit answering the questions?) if so, then it is time for you to put it on the page with the others.  +++$+++ :::Looks fine to me, have you adjusted the date and time to be exactly 7 days after your acceptance (the edit answering the questions?) if so, then it is time for you to put it on the page with the others. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 18:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544259 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.185758340E09 +++$+++ What exactly do you mean?  +++$+++ ::What exactly do you mean? [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 18:19, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544260 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.185758340E09 +++$+++ BTW, It's continue our discussions here, Reply here, it's easier for me.  +++$+++ :::BTW, It's continue our discussions here, Reply here, it's easier for me. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 18:19, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544261 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.185758760E09 +++$+++ Tim, You should probably sign your name right after your text about nominating me. For instance how \"Husond\" did here [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Giggy]].  +++$+++ ::::Tim, You should probably sign your name right after your text about nominating me. For instance how "Husond" did here [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Giggy]]. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 18:26, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544262 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.185759060E09 +++$+++ Tim, I'm not sure how to move it to the page for discussion. I think the nominator is supposed to do that.  +++$+++ ::Tim, I'm not sure how to move it to the page for discussion. I think the nominator is supposed to do that. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 18:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544263 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.185759120E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I've tried to clarify the instructions [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship\/nominate#What_to_do_if_you_are_nominated_by_someone_else here], if you found the third item confusing.  +++$+++ :::Thanks, I've tried to clarify the instructions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/nominate#What_to_do_if_you_are_nominated_by_someone_else here], if you found the third item confusing. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 18:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544264 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.185759480E09 +++$+++ Ok, I've added my name to that list for discussion. If I've made any mistakes or if anything else needs to be done please let me know so that I can correct it.  +++$+++ ::Ok, I've added my name to that list for discussion. If I've made any mistakes or if anything else needs to be done please let me know so that I can correct it. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 18:38, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544265 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.185759840E09 +++$+++ Looks good.  +++$+++ :Looks good. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 18:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
544266 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544252 +++$+++ 544265 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.185759960E09 +++$+++ Great. Thank you.  +++$+++ ::Great. Thank you. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 18:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

19965 +++$+++ The Anome +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-06 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.294385820E09 +++$+++ If you see any similar articles, instead of simply deleting the file header and leaving it, you might want to call an admin's attention to the article, so they can do a similar job. --  +++$+++ If you see any similar articles, instead of simply deleting the file header and leaving it, you might want to call an admin's attention to the article, so they can do a similar job. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome|talk]]) 23:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
19966 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19965 +++$+++ 19965 +++$+++ 2011-01-07 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.294389240E09 +++$+++ Oh, thanks! Didn't know about that. -- +++$+++ :Oh, thanks! Didn't know about that. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 00:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

19969 +++$+++ Scott MacDonald +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-09 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.294620180E09 +++$+++ We can disagree about Wikiphilosophy, but [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Death_of_Philip_Gale&curid=4265120&diff=406895645&oldid=406891471 this] is going too far. Adding that shit to a biography of a victim in order to pursue a inhouse game is unacceptable. Stop, think, and exercise some human judgement. You are bordering on trolling now.-- +++$+++ We can disagree about Wikiphilosophy, but [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Death_of_Philip_Gale&curid=4265120&diff=406895645&oldid=406891471 this] is going too far. Adding that shit to a biography of a victim in order to pursue a inhouse game is unacceptable. Stop, think, and exercise some human judgement. You are bordering on trolling now.--[[User talk:Scott MacDonald|Scott Mac]] 16:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
19970 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19969 +++$+++ 19969 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.294620540E09 +++$+++ Uh, no, I'm not \"proving a point\": an editor added sourced information to balance the NPOV of the article and you removed it without any policy- or guideline- based reasoning. BLP is also not a concern: the guy is dead. I won't add it again myself because it would be edit warring, but you can't come here and say \"stop it\" or accusing me of trolling over a content dispute. I accept to be criticized but I don't accept to be threatened by you only on the basis of your disagreement. -- +++$+++ :Uh, no, I'm not "proving a point": an editor added sourced information to balance the NPOV of the article and you removed it without any policy- or guideline- based reasoning. BLP is also not a concern: the guy is dead. I won't add it again myself because it would be edit warring, but you can't come here and say "stop it" or accusing me of trolling over a content dispute. I accept to be criticized but I don't accept to be threatened by you only on the basis of your disagreement. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 16:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
19971 +++$+++ Scott MacDonald +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19969 +++$+++ 19970 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.294622220E09 +++$+++ Your edits are a disgrace. The editor who added it has already indicated he agreed it was unacceptable content. To suggest that we include such information on a suicide victim because he's not a living person is too contemptible to reply to. The guideline is human decency, and you shouldn't need that set into a rule book for you to get it. You are heading for being banned from all BLPs if you can't work out a more responsible attitude. Even a a legalistic reading of policy and guidelines don't justify dicking with sensitive content. If you can't edit such things with a modicum of responsibility you should not be editing at all. You are crossing a line.-- +++$+++ ::Your edits are a disgrace. The editor who added it has already indicated he agreed it was unacceptable content. To suggest that we include such information on a suicide victim because he's not a living person is too contemptible to reply to. The guideline is human decency, and you shouldn't need that set into a rule book for you to get it. You are heading for being banned from all BLPs if you can't work out a more responsible attitude. Even a a legalistic reading of policy and guidelines don't justify dicking with sensitive content. If you can't edit such things with a modicum of responsibility you should not be editing at all. You are crossing a line.--[[User talk:Scott MacDonald|Scott Mac]] 17:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
19972 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19969 +++$+++ 19971 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.294622580E09 +++$+++ [[WP:RFC\/U]] is that-a-way. Otherwise, sorry, but I don't care at all of your attempts of imposing your personal ethical attitude to me. If you want to indulge in constructive dialogue, fine, but in such a case please develope a more respectful attitude for editor who don't share your own personal world view. That you don't personally like when sources say something not completely flattering about a fellow is not grounds to call adding such a material a \"disgrace\". -- +++$+++ :::[[WP:RFC/U]] is that-a-way. Otherwise, sorry, but I don't care at all of your attempts of imposing your personal ethical attitude to me. If you want to indulge in constructive dialogue, fine, but in such a case please develope a more respectful attitude for editor who don't share your own personal world view. That you don't personally like when sources say something not completely flattering about a fellow is not grounds to call adding such a material a "disgrace". --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 17:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
19973 +++$+++ Scott MacDonald +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19969 +++$+++ 19972 +++$+++ 2011-01-09 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.294622880E09 +++$+++ Respect is earned. You've lost it. You can't go about publishing offensive disrespectful stuff on real people and then demand that people role-play respect in house. Sorry. I will be filling up the RFCU later. But you might like to review the badlydrawnjeff arbitration to see where this type of editing can end.-- +++$+++ ::::Respect is earned. You've lost it. You can't go about publishing offensive disrespectful stuff on real people and then demand that people role-play respect in house. Sorry. I will be filling up the RFCU later. But you might like to review the badlydrawnjeff arbitration to see where this type of editing can end.--[[User talk:Scott MacDonald|Scott Mac]] 17:28, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

19974 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-13 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.294970520E09 +++$+++ Nice work on the [[Oreste Scalzone]] BLP. Although it could benefit from a couple of English citations, the article is beneficial indeed, well done.  +++$+++ Nice work on the [[Oreste Scalzone]] BLP. Although it could benefit from a couple of English citations, the article is beneficial indeed, well done. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 18:02, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
19975 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19974 +++$+++ 19974 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.294971420E09 +++$+++ As an Italian I feel suited to work on these subjects by helping with sources in my native language (I noticed the related [[Franco Piperno]] is still unreferenced and negative; plan to work on that soon) I agree however with your comment. I'll look for a couple English refs at least for the most potentially controversial facts. -- +++$+++ :As an Italian I feel suited to work on these subjects by helping with sources in my native language (I noticed the related [[Franco Piperno]] is still unreferenced and negative; plan to work on that soon) I agree however with your comment. I'll look for a couple English refs at least for the most potentially controversial facts. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 18:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

19976 +++$+++ Scott MacDonald +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-15 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.295155020E09 +++$+++ Whatever else you are, you are a good researcher. So, see if you can prove me wrong on this one. It's a bit of a puzzle.-- +++$+++ Whatever else you are, you are a good researcher. So, see if you can prove me wrong on this one. It's a bit of a puzzle.--[[User talk:Scott MacDonald|Scott Mac]] 21:17, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
19977 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19976 +++$+++ 19976 +++$+++ 2011-01-16 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.295210640E09 +++$+++ Tried now and it seems you're right. I'll try harder later but chances are very slim -no online sources for \"Internet supermodel\" = hoax in my book. I just !voted delete. -- +++$+++ :Tried now and it seems you're right. I'll try harder later but chances are very slim -no online sources for "Internet supermodel" = hoax in my book. I just !voted delete. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 12:44, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

19978 +++$+++ DMSBel +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-18 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.295406060E09 +++$+++ Your comment on the ejaculation talk page is out of line again. If it is not removed I will seek a block on your account. +++$+++ Your comment on the ejaculation talk page is out of line again. If it is not removed I will seek a block on your account.[[User:DMSBel|DMSBel]] ([[User talk:DMSBel|talk]]) 19:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
19979 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.295406660E09 +++$+++ Read [[WP:DUCK]]. It quacks. -- +++$+++ :Read [[WP:DUCK]]. It quacks. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 19:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
19980 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.295406780E09 +++$+++ By the way I wasn't saying you were maliciously socking, I just thought you forgot to log in.You do this often, so I just thought it happened again. -- +++$+++ :By the way I wasn't saying you were maliciously socking, I just thought you forgot to log in.You do this often, so I just thought it happened again. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 19:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
19981 +++$+++ DMSBel +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.295406780E09 +++$+++ What are you bringing up WP:DUCK for then? You are back-pedaling now. You intended to give the impression or were under the impression that those IPs were me, simply because they argued the pictures should be removed. It is not just me you are bothering here. If the comment is not removed I will be seeking your block. Last chance. +++$+++ :::What are you bringing up WP:DUCK for then? You are back-pedaling now. You intended to give the impression or were under the impression that those IPs were me, simply because they argued the pictures should be removed. It is not just me you are bothering here. If the comment is not removed I will be seeking your block. Last chance.[[User:DMSBel|DMSBel]] ([[User talk:DMSBel|talk]]) 19:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
19982 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.295407260E09 +++$+++ I am not backpedaling. ''I am'' still under the impressions that these IPs were you, per [[WP:DUCK]]. It's not only what they say, but ''how'' they say it, the arguments they bring in, the wording etc. were suspiciously similar to yours. But I am ''not'' under the impression that you're ''maliciously'' socking, so it's not a sockpuppetry accusation, more a \"hey, don't forget to log in\". Seek whatever you like, I suspect it will be a replica of your last [[WP:WQA]] [[WP:BOOMERANG|boomerang]]. Bye. -- +++$+++ ::::I am not backpedaling. ''I am'' still under the impressions that these IPs were you, per [[WP:DUCK]]. It's not only what they say, but ''how'' they say it, the arguments they bring in, the wording etc. were suspiciously similar to yours. But I am ''not'' under the impression that you're ''maliciously'' socking, so it's not a sockpuppetry accusation, more a "hey, don't forget to log in". Seek whatever you like, I suspect it will be a replica of your last [[WP:WQA]] [[WP:BOOMERANG|boomerang]]. Bye. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 19:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
19983 +++$+++ DMSBel +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.295411220E09 +++$+++ I have asked for editor assistance on this here [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Editor_assistance\/Requests#Suggestion_of_sock-puppetry_not_retracted_after_request.]] +++$+++ :::::I have asked for editor assistance on this here [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#Suggestion_of_sock-puppetry_not_retracted_after_request.]][[User:DMSBel|DMSBel]] ([[User talk:DMSBel|talk]]) 20:27, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
19984 +++$+++ DMSBel +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.295412000E09 +++$+++ I have informed you that those IPs are not mine. Can you explain why you are not removing your comment suggesting they are? If you were just giving me a reminder about logging in, there seems no reason to keep the comment there now that I have told you these IPs are another user. Run a check on the IP if you want. But don't keep wasting my time.  +++$+++ ::::::I have informed you that those IPs are not mine. Can you explain why you are not removing your comment suggesting they are? If you were just giving me a reminder about logging in, there seems no reason to keep the comment there now that I have told you these IPs are another user. Run a check on the IP if you want. But don't keep wasting my time. [[User:DMSBel|DMSBel]] ([[User talk:DMSBel|talk]]) 20:40, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
19985 +++$+++ DMSBel +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.295510760E09 +++$+++ Hi, with regard to the above, I am accepting that you were genuinely mistaken on this occasion and you were not attempting to insinuate sockpuppetry. I have edited the section header here to reflect that. For your reference my IP is 62.254.133.139. With regard to the images in question, I hope you will come round to understanding that all the policies allow a degree of latitude with regard to removal of content. It is perhaps understandable that WP:NOTCENSORED is applied fairly rigorously and without that latitude sometimes. In this instance though we can allow editorial discretion the degree of latitude it needs without breaching WP:NOTCENSORED, as the talk page is always open for discussion of content issues. We do however need to take the matter of editing seriously, and avoid being played for fools and mistaking silliness for being radical, as other editors have pointed out. To some degree it is true that \"we have all been had\", myself included though I have been trying to mitigate the worst excesses on that page, I hope you will understand my reasons for pressing for a new consensus. Encyclopedias do not need radicals, they are simply a means for gathering knowledge on subjects and presenting it clearly not for pushing agendas or boundaries or challenging existing mores on what is acceptable. Though I generally have no interest in his writings you might want to consider that Nietzsche said that wisdom \"puts limits to knowledge\". Also [[Goethe]]: \u201cWe would have a better knowledge of things if we did not try to know them so thoroughly.\u201d Josef Pieper: \"there is no doubt that the will-to-knowledge, this noble power of the human being, requires a restraining wisdom, \"in order that man may not strive immoderately for the knowledge of things.\"  +++$+++ ::::::::Hi, with regard to the above, I am accepting that you were genuinely mistaken on this occasion and you were not attempting to insinuate sockpuppetry. I have edited the section header here to reflect that. For your reference my IP is 62.254.133.139. With regard to the images in question, I hope you will come round to understanding that all the policies allow a degree of latitude with regard to removal of content. It is perhaps understandable that WP:NOTCENSORED is applied fairly rigorously and without that latitude sometimes. In this instance though we can allow editorial discretion the degree of latitude it needs without breaching WP:NOTCENSORED, as the talk page is always open for discussion of content issues. We do however need to take the matter of editing seriously, and avoid being played for fools and mistaking silliness for being radical, as other editors have pointed out. To some degree it is true that "we have all been had", myself included though I have been trying to mitigate the worst excesses on that page, I hope you will understand my reasons for pressing for a new consensus. Encyclopedias do not need radicals, they are simply a means for gathering knowledge on subjects and presenting it clearly not for pushing agendas or boundaries or challenging existing mores on what is acceptable. Though I generally have no interest in his writings you might want to consider that Nietzsche said that wisdom "puts limits to knowledge". Also [[Goethe]]: “We would have a better knowledge of things if we did not try to know them so thoroughly.” Josef Pieper: "there is no doubt that the will-to-knowledge, this noble power of the human being, requires a restraining wisdom, "in order that man may not strive immoderately for the knowledge of things." [[User:DMSBel|DMSBel]] ([[User talk:DMSBel|talk]]) 00:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
19986 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.295516640E09 +++$+++ You are not going to convince me (and neither will Goethe). Please [[WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT|stop being disruptive]]. Find something else to contribute to the encyclopedia, this is not something that you're going to win. -- +++$+++ ::::::::::You are not going to convince me (and neither will Goethe). Please [[WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT|stop being disruptive]]. Find something else to contribute to the encyclopedia, this is not something that you're going to win. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 01:44, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
19987 +++$+++ DMSBel +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ 2011-01-22 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.295737020E09 +++$+++ You ask me to \"Think why it has happened?\" Because you over-dramatised the extent of the edit-waring? Human Sexuality articles you said in the header - one article I am currently discussing on, editing. Only one though there are others not sexuality related that I am interested in.  You also posted in the wrong section if your complaint is primarily about edit warring. But I ask you to be honest with yourself and ask yourself what ''you'' are trying to achieve and examine ''your own motives'' in doing this on me. +++$+++ :You ask me to "Think why it has happened?" Because you over-dramatised the extent of the edit-waring? Human Sexuality articles you said in the header - one article I am currently discussing on, editing. Only one though there are others not sexuality related that I am interested in.  You also posted in the wrong section if your complaint is primarily about edit warring. But I ask you to be honest with yourself and ask yourself what ''you'' are trying to achieve and examine ''your own motives'' in doing this on me.[[User:DMSBel|DMSBel]] ([[User talk:DMSBel|talk]]) 14:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
19988 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19978 +++$+++ 19987 +++$+++ 2011-01-22 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.295737200E09 +++$+++ What am I trying to achieve? A thorough encyclopedia, nothing else. Ok, I tried to make you reason. You evidently can't. Good bye. -- +++$+++ ::What am I trying to achieve? A thorough encyclopedia, nothing else. Ok, I tried to make you reason. You evidently can't. Good bye. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 15:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

483927 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483927 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.196991060E09 +++$+++ Here's another one. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Library_matters] The facts he presents are correct. However, we can't allow banned users to get away with editing.  +++$+++ Here's another one. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Library_matters] The facts he presents are correct. However, we can't allow banned users to get away with editing. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 17:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
483928 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483927 +++$+++ 483927 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.197072120E09 +++$+++ I re-added some info in the [[Daguerrotype]] article, minus Liebman's POV-pushing angle on it.  +++$+++ :I re-added some info in the [[Daguerrotype]] article, minus Liebman's POV-pushing angle on it. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 16:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
483929 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483927 +++$+++ 483928 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.197080820E09 +++$+++ What?!  Banned user proxying?!  Now ''you're'' banned!  {{;)}}  \u2014 +++$+++ ::What?!  Banned user proxying?!  Now ''you're'' banned!  {{;)}}  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 18:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
483930 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483927 +++$+++ 483929 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.197081720E09 +++$+++ Banned on the Run. :)  +++$+++ :::Banned on the Run. :) [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 18:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
483931 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483927 +++$+++ 483930 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.197082200E09 +++$+++ How did you like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sex_organ&diff=prev&oldid=176395388 the latest username]?  It's getting downright creepy.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::::How did you like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sex_organ&diff=prev&oldid=176395388 the latest username]?  It's getting downright creepy.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 18:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
483932 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483927 +++$+++ 483931 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.197082500E09 +++$+++ Eek. And double eek. There can no longer be any doubt that the guy is a major loon.  +++$+++ :::::Eek. And double eek. There can no longer be any doubt that the guy is a major loon. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 18:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
483933 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483927 +++$+++ 483927 +++$+++ 2007-12-08 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.197104520E09 +++$+++ Here's [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Klippstein another one], I believe. And to quote [[Zaphod Beeblebrox|Zaphod]] after meeting [[Minor characters from The Hitchhiker%27s Guide to the Galaxy#The Ruler of the Universe|the Man in the Shack]], \"Oh, that clears it up; he's a weirdo.\" :) - +++$+++ :Here's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Klippstein another one], I believe. And to quote [[Zaphod Beeblebrox|Zaphod]] after meeting [[Minor characters from The Hitchhiker%27s Guide to the Galaxy#The Ruler of the Universe|the Man in the Shack]], "Oh, that clears it up; he's a weirdo." :) -[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] ([[User talk:Ebyabe|talk]]) 01:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
483934 +++$+++ Ebyabe +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483927 +++$+++ 483933 +++$+++ 2007-12-08 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.197104700E09 +++$+++ And I hate to think he's a [[Dungeons & Dragons|D&D]] fan, but the only reference I can find to that term is in [[Nodwick]]. Go figure... - +++$+++ ::And I hate to think he's a [[Dungeons & Dragons|D&D]] fan, but the only reference I can find to that term is in [[Nodwick]]. Go figure... -[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] ([[User talk:Ebyabe|talk]]) 01:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

544270 +++$+++ Gosgood +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544270 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-01 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.186019880E09 +++$+++ Hello Tim. Hope all is well. Just a minor, minor note that a magical spell of yours is going amiss; no major population centers are being decimated, and, according to the news this morning, no more than the usual number of governments have toppled. I'm a bit chargined that [[News Corporation]] will likely become the new owners of [[Dow Jones]], a decline in the number of independent information channels seems the order of the day, but since I haven't established your culpability, I shan't be hunting you down. However, I don't think this spell is [[Talk:Parapsychology#Good article nomination review|quite working the way you expected]]. Surely you are not reviewing this article daily! Variables <code><nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}}<\/nowiki><\/code>, <code><nowiki>{{CURRENTDAY}}<\/nowiki><\/code>, and <code><nowiki>{{CURRENTYEAR}}<\/nowiki><\/code> are expanding out on ''every'' page rendition, and not just the one time you placed a reference to a template of some sort. The snippits <code><nowiki><includeonly>subst:<\/includeonly><\/nowiki><\/code> seem suspect. My (possibly defective) understanding of <code>[[meta:Help:Template#Noinclude, includeonly, and onlyinclude|includeonly]]<\/code> is: 'don't expand the stuff bracketed by <code><nowiki><includeonly>...<\/includeonly><\/nowiki><\/code> on the base page (usually in the Template: namespace), but ''do'' expand that stuff on the page upon which the template is being included.' Because these tags are sitting on the talk page (establishing ''that'' page as the base), and because <code><nowiki>subt:<\/nowiki><\/code> sits between them, the 'expand once' aspect of substitution is not being invoked and the date variables are rendered every time. Perhaps this is the result of some other template that isn't being rendered out in an expected way? Or perhaps my analysis and theory are all wrong. If that's the case, don't tell me; I cannot stand it when mere facts intrude upon my pretty little theories. Do look at this when you have an idle moment or two (And wouldn't <code><nowiki>'~~~~~'<\/nowiki><\/code> be simpler, per the [[KISS principle|KISS]] principle? But perhaps that is no fun)? Take care. \u2014  +++$+++ Hello Tim. Hope all is well. Just a minor, minor note that a magical spell of yours is going amiss; no major population centers are being decimated, and, according to the news this morning, no more than the usual number of governments have toppled. I'm a bit chargined that [[News Corporation]] will likely become the new owners of [[Dow Jones]], a decline in the number of independent information channels seems the order of the day, but since I haven't established your culpability, I shan't be hunting you down. However, I don't think this spell is [[Talk:Parapsychology#Good article nomination review|quite working the way you expected]]. Surely you are not reviewing this article daily! Variables <code><nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}}</nowiki></code>, <code><nowiki>{{CURRENTDAY}}</nowiki></code>, and <code><nowiki>{{CURRENTYEAR}}</nowiki></code> are expanding out on ''every'' page rendition, and not just the one time you placed a reference to a template of some sort. The snippits <code><nowiki><includeonly>subst:</includeonly></nowiki></code> seem suspect. My (possibly defective) understanding of <code>[[meta:Help:Template#Noinclude, includeonly, and onlyinclude|includeonly]]</code> is: 'don't expand the stuff bracketed by <code><nowiki><includeonly>...</includeonly></nowiki></code> on the base page (usually in the Template: namespace), but ''do'' expand that stuff on the page upon which the template is being included.' Because these tags are sitting on the talk page (establishing ''that'' page as the base), and because <code><nowiki>subt:</nowiki></code> sits between them, the 'expand once' aspect of substitution is not being invoked and the date variables are rendered every time. Perhaps this is the result of some other template that isn't being rendered out in an expected way? Or perhaps my analysis and theory are all wrong. If that's the case, don't tell me; I cannot stand it when mere facts intrude upon my pretty little theories. Do look at this when you have an idle moment or two (And wouldn't <code><nowiki>'~~~~~'</nowiki></code> be simpler, per the [[KISS principle|KISS]] principle? But perhaps that is no fun)? Take care. — [[User:Gosgood|Gosgood]] 18:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
544271 +++$+++ Gosgood +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544270 +++$+++ 544270 +++$+++ 2007-08-01 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.186023780E09 +++$+++ By the way, I whimsically regard all templates as magic; though I have a software development background, I've not taken the time to fully spelunk MediaWiki templating code; I believe it was [[John W. Campbell]] who suggested that one culture's engineering is another (more primitive) culture's magic: hence my Potter-ish prose. Take care \u2014  +++$+++ :By the way, I whimsically regard all templates as magic; though I have a software development background, I've not taken the time to fully spelunk MediaWiki templating code; I believe it was [[John W. Campbell]] who suggested that one culture's engineering is another (more primitive) culture's magic: hence my Potter-ish prose. Take care — [[User:Gosgood|Gosgood]] 20:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

282127 +++$+++ Enuja +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-07 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.175942460E09 +++$+++ I swear I have [[monitor lizard]] watched, really, I do.  However, I somehow missed your reply on the talk page, and just now responded.  Please continue our conversation on the talk page.   +++$+++ I swear I have [[monitor lizard]] watched, really, I do.  However, I somehow missed your reply on the talk page, and just now responded.  Please continue our conversation on the talk page.  [[User:Enuja|Enuja]] 03:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
282128 +++$+++ Enuja +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282127 +++$+++ 282127 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.175947920E09 +++$+++ Okay, I think I'm done for the day, living in North America and all.  I've done some editing on the intelligence section and explained myself on the talk page.   +++$+++ :Okay, I think I'm done for the day, living in North America and all.  I've done some editing on the intelligence section and explained myself on the talk page.  [[User:Enuja|Enuja]] 05:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

544272 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-02 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.186040460E09 +++$+++ Hey, I've decided to regretfully withdrawal my RFA. Based on the numbers I don't believe it would have ever been successful. It seemed to have gotten off to a bad start and then went down hill from there. I appreciate your participation. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hey, I've decided to regretfully withdrawal my RFA. Based on the numbers I don't believe it would have ever been successful. It seemed to have gotten off to a bad start and then went down hill from there. I appreciate your participation. Thanks. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 00:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
544273 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544272 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.186051200E09 +++$+++ Tim, I might try at it again in a month or two. Would you be willing to re-nominate me again then?  +++$+++ ::Tim, I might try at it again in a month or two. Would you be willing to re-nominate me again then? [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 03:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

527619 +++$+++ Natalie Erin +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527619 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-30 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.177922760E09 +++$+++ is absolutely brilliant. I just have a two suggestions: change the wording on G12 to read \"blatant copyright infringement\" (it currently reads \"Blatant Copyright\"), and make the capitalization consistent (some of the reasons have all the words capitalized and some of them don't).  +++$+++ is absolutely brilliant. I just have a two suggestions: change the wording on G12 to read "blatant copyright infringement" (it currently reads "Blatant Copyright"), and make the capitalization consistent (some of the reasons have all the words capitalized and some of them don't). [[User:Natalie Erin|Natalie]] 01:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
527620 +++$+++ Natalie Erin +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527619 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-30 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.177923480E09 +++$+++ Cool. I'm surprised no one thought of this script sooner, quite frankly. They should just build it into the MediaWiki software, if you ask me.  +++$+++ ::Cool. I'm surprised no one thought of this script sooner, quite frankly. They should just build it into the MediaWiki software, if you ask me. [[User:Natalie Erin|Natalie]] 01:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

282132 +++$+++ The Thadman +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.176291240E09 +++$+++ Oh to answer your question, you left [[User:USERNAME]] on the case and that was what I was commenting on. <font color=\"SteelBlue\">[[User:Aeon1006|\xc6on]]<\/font> <font color=\"red\"><sup>[[User talk:Aeon1006|Insanity Now!]]<\/sup><\/font> <font color=\"green\"><sub> +++$+++ Oh to answer your question, you left [[User:USERNAME]] on the case and that was what I was commenting on. <font color="SteelBlue">[[User:Aeon1006|Æon]]</font> <font color="red"><sup>[[User talk:Aeon1006|Insanity Now!]]</sup></font> <font color="green"><sub>[[User:The Thadman/Give Back Our Membership|Give Back Our Membership!]]</sub></font> 04:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
282133 +++$+++ Deryck Chan +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282132 +++$+++ 282132 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.176565080E09 +++$+++ Hope my advice helps. Cheers too. -- +++$+++ :Hope my advice helps. Cheers too. --[[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 08:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

19989 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19989 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-24 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.295938560E09 +++$+++ How do I \"inform a Wikiproject\"? I would have liked to do so in several articles, but is this not [[WP:Canvassing]]?  +++$+++ How do I "inform a Wikiproject"? I would have liked to do so in several articles, but is this not [[WP:Canvassing]]? [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 22:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
19990 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19989 +++$+++ 19989 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.295938980E09 +++$+++ Hi! No it isn't, quite the opposite: wikiprojects exist exactly to provide help from editors who specialize or anyway care about a subject. You just go to the desired wikiproject talk page, open a new section and ask with a <u>neutral<\/u> message for help. -- +++$+++ :Hi! No it isn't, quite the opposite: wikiprojects exist exactly to provide help from editors who specialize or anyway care about a subject. You just go to the desired wikiproject talk page, open a new section and ask with a <u>neutral</u> message for help. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 23:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
19991 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19989 +++$+++ 19990 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.295940660E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I contortedly retracted the \"bad faith\" words, and will try to point out what I actually believe is going on with other wording, since using the expression \"bad faith\" now seems to me to be counterproductive, even when I think it likely exists.   +++$+++ ::Thanks. I contortedly retracted the "bad faith" words, and will try to point out what I actually believe is going on with other wording, since using the expression "bad faith" now seems to me to be counterproductive, even when I think it likely exists.  [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 23:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
19992 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19989 +++$+++ 19991 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.295940840E09 +++$+++ Uhm, no. You should be neutral, otherwise it ''is'' akin to canvassing. You should simply say \"Hi, there is a dispute about the wording of the lede in [[Homeopathy]], further input would be welcome\" or something on these lines. If you spread drama by talking about people being in bad faith (even if with other words) etc. ,you're doing it wrong. -- +++$+++ :::Uhm, no. You should be neutral, otherwise it ''is'' akin to canvassing. You should simply say "Hi, there is a dispute about the wording of the lede in [[Homeopathy]], further input would be welcome" or something on these lines. If you spread drama by talking about people being in bad faith (even if with other words) etc. ,you're doing it wrong. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 23:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
19993 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19989 +++$+++ 19992 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.295943120E09 +++$+++ I meant on talk pages I should not use the expression \"bad faith\", but instead, point out what happened to make me think bad faith.  I might be wrong in thinking it, but right in that something happened that should not have causing me to think it, and should focus only on content, not on any editor.  On Wikiproject pages I would just write \"there is a discussion about a subject related to this project here[]\".   +++$+++ ::::I meant on talk pages I should not use the expression "bad faith", but instead, point out what happened to make me think bad faith.  I might be wrong in thinking it, but right in that something happened that should not have causing me to think it, and should focus only on content, not on any editor.  On Wikiproject pages I would just write "there is a discussion about a subject related to this project here[]".  [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 00:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
19994 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19989 +++$+++ 19993 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.295943660E09 +++$+++ Ok, that's cool. -- +++$+++ :::::Ok, that's cool. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 00:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

282134 +++$+++ Aarktica +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.176935220E09 +++$+++ A week ago, you asked for assistance regarding [[WP:Editor assistance\/Request#Request for assistance with Dispute|Request for assistance with Dispute]] with the EAR program. Has the feedback you received help resolve the issue in question? -- +++$+++ A week ago, you asked for assistance regarding [[WP:Editor assistance/Request#Request for assistance with Dispute|Request for assistance with Dispute]] with the EAR program. Has the feedback you received help resolve the issue in question? --[[User:Aarktica|Aarktica]] 15:27, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
282135 +++$+++ Aarktica +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282134 +++$+++ 282134 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.177047600E09 +++$+++ Using talk pages &mdash; as you have been doing &mdash; is definitely a plus. However, I hope that these resources might be helpful to your efforts. -- +++$+++ :Using talk pages &mdash; as you have been doing &mdash; is definitely a plus. However, I hope that these resources might be helpful to your efforts. --[[User:Aarktica|Aarktica]] 22:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

19995 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-25 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.295981580E09 +++$+++ Since I have started editing at pseudoscience sites, the same group of a handful of editors have been following me around and deleting all my edits, then coincidentaly they all apear to vote to retain the reverts of my edits.  For example, here [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bad_faith&action=historysubmit&diff=409940093&oldid=409925419], where (1) my \"construction\" tag was removed, (2) eighteen reliable sources were deleted, and (3) all of the RS content I put in was deleted.  This left an article with only one single source for one sentence in the article, and an entire article with NRS and POV to only bad faith in the law.  I don't want to make accusations of bad faith again, but it is quite coincidental that the same handful of editors appear wherever I edit, now even when I edit at unrelated article.  This started when I begaon to remove NRS and POV material from pseudoscience articles like acupuncture and homeopathy.  You can check my contribution history, and you will see that I have made substantial contributions in diverse areas of Wikipedia, and almost all have been reverted by the same handful of editors who coincidentally edit wherever I do.  They are making POV pro-pseudoscience reverts of my RS edits with no good reason, then backing up the reverts with invalid arguments like the straw man argument, and voting together on talk.   Until editing at the pseudoscience sites, I have never been close to an edit war.  Now, I expect more problems, and I do not want to waste time putting RS in articles and make more edits if they are going to be undone. Is there an authority that can look at the revert here[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bad_faith&action=historysubmit&diff=409940093&oldid=409925419] and do someting to stop such massive reverts of construction tags, RS material, and sources, leaving only NRS and POV material in the article?  +++$+++ Since I have started editing at pseudoscience sites, the same group of a handful of editors have been following me around and deleting all my edits, then coincidentaly they all apear to vote to retain the reverts of my edits.  For example, here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bad_faith&action=historysubmit&diff=409940093&oldid=409925419], where (1) my "construction" tag was removed, (2) eighteen reliable sources were deleted, and (3) all of the RS content I put in was deleted.  This left an article with only one single source for one sentence in the article, and an entire article with NRS and POV to only bad faith in the law.  I don't want to make accusations of bad faith again, but it is quite coincidental that the same handful of editors appear wherever I edit, now even when I edit at unrelated article.  This started when I begaon to remove NRS and POV material from pseudoscience articles like acupuncture and homeopathy.  You can check my contribution history, and you will see that I have made substantial contributions in diverse areas of Wikipedia, and almost all have been reverted by the same handful of editors who coincidentally edit wherever I do.  They are making POV pro-pseudoscience reverts of my RS edits with no good reason, then backing up the reverts with invalid arguments like the straw man argument, and voting together on talk.   Until editing at the pseudoscience sites, I have never been close to an edit war.  Now, I expect more problems, and I do not want to waste time putting RS in articles and make more edits if they are going to be undone. Is there an authority that can look at the revert here[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bad_faith&action=historysubmit&diff=409940093&oldid=409925419] and do someting to stop such massive reverts of construction tags, RS material, and sources, leaving only NRS and POV material in the article? [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 10:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
19996 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19995 +++$+++ 19995 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.295985600E09 +++$+++ Without commenting on the specifics of the edits, I suspect a problem is that you add too much material at the same time. It is a common faux pas for new editors. By doing this, it is difficult to distinguish material which is valid from material which it isn't, and editors often resort to just reverting it all. If you want to add massive amount of material, and you see it rejected per [[WP:BRD]] then better to take the issue on the talk page. About pseudoscience articles, sadly they're a POV pushing minefield, so take special care and try to be impeccable in whatever you do there. -- +++$+++ :Without commenting on the specifics of the edits, I suspect a problem is that you add too much material at the same time. It is a common faux pas for new editors. By doing this, it is difficult to distinguish material which is valid from material which it isn't, and editors often resort to just reverting it all. If you want to add massive amount of material, and you see it rejected per [[WP:BRD]] then better to take the issue on the talk page. About pseudoscience articles, sadly they're a POV pushing minefield, so take special care and try to be impeccable in whatever you do there. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 12:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
19997 +++$+++ BullRangifer +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19995 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.296273180E09 +++$+++ I just noticed this and looked at the edit history there. As pointed out (also below) you definitely add far too much material at a time for other editors to really understand what's going on. BRD is very much a factor, and you actually edit warred over it. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bad_faith&diff=410047974&oldid=410045418 This] was a very bad move, and is more apparent when looking at the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bad_faith&action=history total history]. Don't do that. It was your second violation of BRD. YOU are the one obligated to start the discussion, not the one who reverts you. BTW, violation of BRD is the only known way to immediately identify the start of an edit war and to clearly identify who started it, so respect it. I hope this advice will keep you from getting into trouble, because you're doing lots of good work here. Regardless of how good it is, BRD should be respected since we're a collaborative project. --  +++$+++ ::: I just noticed this and looked at the edit history there. As pointed out (also below) you definitely add far too much material at a time for other editors to really understand what's going on. BRD is very much a factor, and you actually edit warred over it. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bad_faith&diff=410047974&oldid=410045418 This] was a very bad move, and is more apparent when looking at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bad_faith&action=history total history]. Don't do that. It was your second violation of BRD. YOU are the one obligated to start the discussion, not the one who reverts you. BTW, violation of BRD is the only known way to immediately identify the start of an edit war and to clearly identify who started it, so respect it. I hope this advice will keep you from getting into trouble, because you're doing lots of good work here. Regardless of how good it is, BRD should be respected since we're a collaborative project. -- [[User:BullRangifer|Brangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) 19:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
19998 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19995 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.296274740E09 +++$+++ Points you and others make are good.  So I deleted the many sections, and moved their content to talk, starting a talk page section for each of the many sections I propose adding. I added just two sections, not ten at a time, leaving the many other sections and their content to be discussed at talk, for ease of readablity of other editors.   +++$+++ ::::Points you and others make are good.  So I deleted the many sections, and moved their content to talk, starting a talk page section for each of the many sections I propose adding. I added just two sections, not ten at a time, leaving the many other sections and their content to be discussed at talk, for ease of readablity of other editors.  [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 20:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
19999 +++$+++ George1918 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19995 +++$+++ 19996 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.295999100E09 +++$+++ Hi. It is difficult to summarize the scientific consensus on homeopathy's effectiveness   since this can lead to bias (pro or anti homeopathy). The available literature and research  has not reached such a  consensus. If you read carefully the reviews and the debate appearing not in homeopathy publications but in major scientific journals. Anybody could produce at least 3 high quality sources depicting  the above situation.-- +++$+++ ::Hi. It is difficult to summarize the scientific consensus on homeopathy's effectiveness   since this can lead to bias (pro or anti homeopathy). The available literature and research  has not reached such a  consensus. If you read carefully the reviews and the debate appearing not in homeopathy publications but in major scientific journals. Anybody could produce at least 3 high quality sources depicting  the above situation.--[[User:George1918|George1918]] ([[User talk:George1918|talk]]) 15:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20000 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19995 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.296004440E09 +++$+++ I dealt with this problem of random false positives beyond placebo in homeopathy, by including a section discussing [[p-values]], [[E-value]]s, [[publication bias]], and the [[file drawer effect]] in the homeopathy article.  The section I inserted was deleted.   +++$+++ ::::I dealt with this problem of random false positives beyond placebo in homeopathy, by including a section discussing [[p-values]], [[E-value]]s, [[publication bias]], and the [[file drawer effect]] in the homeopathy article.  The section I inserted was deleted.  [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 17:14, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20001 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19995 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.296004560E09 +++$+++ Can you provide me the diff with that section? -- +++$+++ :::::Can you provide me the diff with that section? --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 17:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20002 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19995 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.296004980E09 +++$+++ Cyclopia, I don't know how to find my edit inserting the section, since the search history function on the history page is not working for me (and is not working for others, either).  It appears that some of the content of my edits was preserved, but broken apart and inserted elsewhere.  +++$+++ ::::::Cyclopia, I don't know how to find my edit inserting the section, since the search history function on the history page is not working for me (and is not working for others, either).  It appears that some of the content of my edits was preserved, but broken apart and inserted elsewhere. [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 17:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20003 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19995 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.296004980E09 +++$+++ George1918, Cyclopia's talk page is not a pseudoscience related page. How did you know I was asking questions about \"bad faith\" here, when there is no reference to this on the homeopathy talk page?  +++$+++ :::::::George1918, Cyclopia's talk page is not a pseudoscience related page. How did you know I was asking questions about "bad faith" here, when there is no reference to this on the homeopathy talk page? [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 17:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20004 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19995 +++$+++ 19999 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.295999280E09 +++$+++ Hi. Sorry, but as a biophysicist I can assure you that you're wrong: scientific consensus is clear on homeopathy being ''not'' effective. That fringe sources can be produced rebuking that does not mean that the consensus of peer-reviewed research is different. Remember also that \"consensus\" does not mean \"unanimous agreement\". Finally, why discussing it on my talk? Use the homeopathy talk page. -- +++$+++ :::Hi. Sorry, but as a biophysicist I can assure you that you're wrong: scientific consensus is clear on homeopathy being ''not'' effective. That fringe sources can be produced rebuking that does not mean that the consensus of peer-reviewed research is different. Remember also that "consensus" does not mean "unanimous agreement". Finally, why discussing it on my talk? Use the homeopathy talk page. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 15:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20005 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 19995 +++$+++ 20004 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.296004020E09 +++$+++ (1) The [[bad faith]] article was only about bad faith in the law, a minor part of \"bad faith\", and it had only one RS source for a sentence deep in the article body.  I happen to have been involved in 43 insurance bad faith claims, and 126 attorneys involving involving insurance bad faith, so my backgound was similar to that of the article as I found it, although I also did phil of sci\/mathematical statistics and data analysis, and encountered the concept of bad faith in ethics, phil of mind, and phil of theology courses I was required to take.  So I expanded the article to include RS material citing where \"bad faith\" is used in many other fields, e.g., using the Oxford Dictionary example of \"republicans were negotiating in bad faith\", and citing this dictionary and a Union site article on negotiation, discussing bad faith.  I discussed my changes on the [[bad faith]] talk page and no one responded in any way, except to revert because \"recent edits have turned it into a shambles\".  How do I respond to this, when there was no other response to my detailed talk page comments by anyone?  (2) What is the purpose of a \"construction\" tag during an expansion, if putting it in is going to be reverted?   It was reverted with  with the comment \"The unilateral placement of expansion templates carries no weight\".  What does \"unilateral placement\" mean at Wikipedia?  (3) In the [[bad faith]] article, my RS material was reverted, leaving only NRS material (except for a single sentence that has a source).  It would be interpreted as hostile if I reverted the NRS material as being NRS, replacing it with my RS material.  How do I deal with an entire article with only one citation for a single sentence (and that one single sentence source being a questionable source)?  (4) [[Bad faith]] is not a pseudoscience article.  But after I began to edit on acupuncture, TCM, homeopathy, etc., editors suddenly appeared from those talk pages who were in dispute with me as to my pseudoscience edits, and massively reverted my RS edits.  I am afraid to edit on any other articles because I fear being followed again, and damage being done to those articles from the \"minefield\" of editors.  How do I deal with editors from pseudoscience sites following me around to other kinds of articles, e.g., to the [[bad faith]] article?   +++$+++ ::::(1) The [[bad faith]] article was only about bad faith in the law, a minor part of "bad faith", and it had only one RS source for a sentence deep in the article body.  I happen to have been involved in 43 insurance bad faith claims, and 126 attorneys involving involving insurance bad faith, so my backgound was similar to that of the article as I found it, although I also did phil of sci/mathematical statistics and data analysis, and encountered the concept of bad faith in ethics, phil of mind, and phil of theology courses I was required to take.  So I expanded the article to include RS material citing where "bad faith" is used in many other fields, e.g., using the Oxford Dictionary example of "republicans were negotiating in bad faith", and citing this dictionary and a Union site article on negotiation, discussing bad faith.  I discussed my changes on the [[bad faith]] talk page and no one responded in any way, except to revert because "recent edits have turned it into a shambles".  How do I respond to this, when there was no other response to my detailed talk page comments by anyone?  (2) What is the purpose of a "construction" tag during an expansion, if putting it in is going to be reverted?   It was reverted with  with the comment "The unilateral placement of expansion templates carries no weight".  What does "unilateral placement" mean at Wikipedia?  (3) In the [[bad faith]] article, my RS material was reverted, leaving only NRS material (except for a single sentence that has a source).  It would be interpreted as hostile if I reverted the NRS material as being NRS, replacing it with my RS material.  How do I deal with an entire article with only one citation for a single sentence (and that one single sentence source being a questionable source)?  (4) [[Bad faith]] is not a pseudoscience article.  But after I began to edit on acupuncture, TCM, homeopathy, etc., editors suddenly appeared from those talk pages who were in dispute with me as to my pseudoscience edits, and massively reverted my RS edits.  I am afraid to edit on any other articles because I fear being followed again, and damage being done to those articles from the "minefield" of editors.  How do I deal with editors from pseudoscience sites following me around to other kinds of articles, e.g., to the [[bad faith]] article?  [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 17:07, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

506950 +++$+++ Tyler Warren +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506950 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-17 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.190029620E09 +++$+++ Ahh! So I see!, Okay then, cheers! ''*grabs a Molson Canadian*''  +++$+++ Ahh! So I see!, Okay then, cheers! ''*grabs a Molson Canadian*'' [[User:Tyler Warren|Tyler Warren]] 04:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
506951 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506950 +++$+++ 506950 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.190030700E09 +++$+++ <s>I've already left a note on your talk page explaining the relevant policy regarding users blanking their own talk page. Disregard if you want, but I repeat it is ''not'' a warn-able offense. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] 04:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)<\/s>'' Leaving a more appropriate comment instead of this one on his talk page, I was a little terse.'' -- +++$+++ :<s>I've already left a note on your talk page explaining the relevant policy regarding users blanking their own talk page. Disregard if you want, but I repeat it is ''not'' a warn-able offense. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] 04:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)</s>'' Leaving a more appropriate comment instead of this one on his talk page, I was a little terse.'' --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] 05:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

544285 +++$+++ Sashag +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-07 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.186546500E09 +++$+++ Please help me resolve the situation with the images. Most of them were printed in different articles and I made SVG diagrams to illustrate an article. How it should be handled?  +++$+++ Please help me resolve the situation with the images. Most of them were printed in different articles and I made SVG diagrams to illustrate an article. How it should be handled? [[User:Sashag|Sashag]] 21:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
544286 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544285 +++$+++ 544285 +++$+++ 2007-08-07 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.186546800E09 +++$+++ Hi there. What you need to do is contact S. Geodakyan, who runs http:\/\/www.geodakian.com and request permission to use the images. The process is outlined at [[Wikipedia:Example requests for permission]].  +++$+++ :Hi there. What you need to do is contact S. Geodakyan, who runs http://www.geodakian.com and request permission to use the images. The process is outlined at [[Wikipedia:Example requests for permission]]. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 21:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

265477 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-19 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.161326760E09 +++$+++ Hi, yes, I worried about you.  So did the admin who protected your page.  Please take a look at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=82311670&oldid=82311182 Cyde's comment].  I don't really know the power structure, but I believe that Cyde is a significant person in the hierarchy.  If another admin had taken it upon him or herself to block you indefinitely as a result of Cyde's comment, things would not have turned out as well as they did, regardless of whether you were within your rights with respect to the puppetmaster tag.  Gettnig an idefinite block is not a good thing.  I'm very glad that you made it through this event unscathed, but I'm worried by your comment \"What makes me feel the worst about the whole thing is that you had so little faith in me that you thought I was in danger.\"  It makes me believe you don't understand how this whole thing might have ended.  I'm going to ask [[User:Nishkid64]] to take a look at what I say here.  Maybe I am overreacting, and he can tell us both so.  Take care.  -- +++$+++ Hi, yes, I worried about you.  So did the admin who protected your page.  Please take a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=82311670&oldid=82311182 Cyde's comment].  I don't really know the power structure, but I believe that Cyde is a significant person in the hierarchy.  If another admin had taken it upon him or herself to block you indefinitely as a result of Cyde's comment, things would not have turned out as well as they did, regardless of whether you were within your rights with respect to the puppetmaster tag.  Gettnig an idefinite block is not a good thing.  I'm very glad that you made it through this event unscathed, but I'm worried by your comment "What makes me feel the worst about the whole thing is that you had so little faith in me that you thought I was in danger."  It makes me believe you don't understand how this whole thing might have ended.  I'm going to ask [[User:Nishkid64]] to take a look at what I say here.  Maybe I am overreacting, and he can tell us both so.  Take care.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
265478 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265477 +++$+++ 265477 +++$+++ 2006-10-20 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.161332100E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm sorry about [[User:Nishkid64]]'s comments about you.  That wasn't the opinion I was really looking for.  I wanted him to confirm to you that you were in danger, but I guess I didn't make that clear.  Well, now we know something of what [[User:Nishkid64]] thinks maybe more than we wanted to hear.  Oh well.  Leaving aside his personal evaluation, do you see that things could have turned out very badly?  That's what I'm most concerned that you see.  I think you need to respect admins like fire.  Yes, you can fight fire, but you have to be careful, because the costs of a mistake could be fatal.  Similarly, you can disagree with an admin, but if you choose the wrong way to show your disagreement, you may discover the power disparity between yourself and the admin in a very painful way.  If you don't see it that way, I guess we can just move on.  But if I ever get real concerned again, you'll have to forgive me, because I do worry, and I probably won't keep my worries to myself.  -- +++$+++ :Hi, I'm sorry about [[User:Nishkid64]]'s comments about you.  That wasn't the opinion I was really looking for.  I wanted him to confirm to you that you were in danger, but I guess I didn't make that clear.  Well, now we know something of what [[User:Nishkid64]] thinks maybe more than we wanted to hear.  Oh well.  Leaving aside his personal evaluation, do you see that things could have turned out very badly?  That's what I'm most concerned that you see.  I think you need to respect admins like fire.  Yes, you can fight fire, but you have to be careful, because the costs of a mistake could be fatal.  Similarly, you can disagree with an admin, but if you choose the wrong way to show your disagreement, you may discover the power disparity between yourself and the admin in a very painful way.  If you don't see it that way, I guess we can just move on.  But if I ever get real concerned again, you'll have to forgive me, because I do worry, and I probably won't keep my worries to myself.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 01:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

282145 +++$+++ LRBurdak +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282145 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-18 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.182168720E09 +++$+++ Who says Shiva was jat? Where is written that Shiva was Jat? Authors who say some clan descended from Shiva is given at relevant reference in the article. Behave calmy? Don't get agitated.-- +++$+++ Who says Shiva was jat? Where is written that Shiva was Jat? Authors who say some clan descended from Shiva is given at relevant reference in the article. Behave calmy? Don't get agitated.--[[User:LRBurdak|burdak]] 05:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
282146 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282145 +++$+++ 282145 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.182170940E09 +++$+++ It would seem now that you are claiming the the God (Parmeshwar) - including Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva - were Jats! Is this so?  +++$+++ :It would seem now that you are claiming the the God (Parmeshwar) - including Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva - were Jats! Is this so? [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 05:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

282147 +++$+++ LRBurdak +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282147 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-18 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.182203580E09 +++$+++ It has been written in Indian epics and proves the antiquity of the word Jat. It shows that Jat tribe was the oldest one and its name comes along with Brahma. Can you tell me How old is Brahma Mr John Hill? Now you need to study the Indian epics to understand it.-- +++$+++ It has been written in Indian epics and proves the antiquity of the word Jat. It shows that Jat tribe was the oldest one and its name comes along with Brahma. Can you tell me How old is Brahma Mr John Hill? Now you need to study the Indian epics to understand it.--[[User:LRBurdak|burdak]] 14:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
282148 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282147 +++$+++ 282147 +++$+++ 2007-06-19 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.182263340E09 +++$+++ You have proved nothing, Mr. Burdak - you haven't even established that a reference to Jats exists in the Mahabharata which, in any case, is an epic poem of uncertain historicity.  +++$+++ :You have proved nothing, Mr. Burdak - you haven't even established that a reference to Jats exists in the Mahabharata which, in any case, is an epic poem of uncertain historicity. [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 07:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

20006 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20006 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-25 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.296004200E09 +++$+++ {{od}}Sorry HkFnsNGA but have you read the above? Please try to be less verbose and try and discuss small changes. I'll answer in more detail later, but please tell me before that you understood the above. -- +++$+++ {{od}}Sorry HkFnsNGA but have you read the above? Please try to be less verbose and try and discuss small changes. I'll answer in more detail later, but please tell me before that you understood the above. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 17:10, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20007 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20006 +++$+++ 20006 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.296005700E09 +++$+++ As I understood what you wrote, the revert might have been made only because I added much RS content, and the editor did not read it.  But it is too coincidental that editors from pseudoscience related sites suddenly appear at talk in the bad faith article, without them having been stalking me.  Especially when a similar pattern of such appearance, reverts, and spurious talk page \"arguments\" had been happening so much that I called it \"nit picking\" and \"bad faith\". It is also why I asked the question about how to use the \"construction\" tag, which was not only reverted, but reverted with a comment about the \"construction\" tag being \"unilateral placement\".  I did discuss my edits on the talk page, with itemized requests for help from others in further filling out the article so it is not only about bad faith in law, and so that it has more RS. No one responded in any way, except to revert (with the explanation \"shambles\" and \"unilateral placement of construction tag\") to an almost completely NRS article that only discusses bad faith in the law, .  +++$+++ :As I understood what you wrote, the revert might have been made only because I added much RS content, and the editor did not read it.  But it is too coincidental that editors from pseudoscience related sites suddenly appear at talk in the bad faith article, without them having been stalking me.  Especially when a similar pattern of such appearance, reverts, and spurious talk page "arguments" had been happening so much that I called it "nit picking" and "bad faith". It is also why I asked the question about how to use the "construction" tag, which was not only reverted, but reverted with a comment about the "construction" tag being "unilateral placement".  I did discuss my edits on the talk page, with itemized requests for help from others in further filling out the article so it is not only about bad faith in law, and so that it has more RS. No one responded in any way, except to revert (with the explanation "shambles" and "unilateral placement of construction tag") to an almost completely NRS article that only discusses bad faith in the law, . [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 17:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20008 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20006 +++$+++ 20007 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 17:41:00 +++$+++ 1.296006060E09 +++$+++ {{ec}}It is pretty common for editors to be followed along their contribs if they have been controversial somewhere -that's what the \"User contributions\" link is for, after all. That it is harassment or simply keeping an eye on a possibly troublesome editor (I'm talking in general) depends very much on the precise situation. About the construction tag, well, it simply seems that you ''unilaterally'' decided it was under construction: since there was no consensus for your overhaul of the article, the tag correctly goes away as well. Again, remember that pseudoscience articles are very tricky since they're a POV battlefield. You seem to be a good faith editor which can add lots of very good content, but don't be carried away -after all the point of a wiki is that our edits can (and will) be challenged or reverted at every time. It is only normal for this to happen, and especially new editors, which often do not know all the nuances of the place, are likely to be bitten by this. In any case you should deal with these editors as you should deal with everyone else: by being civil, by following the rules and by abiding to consensus. Don't be quick in assuming bad faith, again. Wikipedia is an exercise in patience, at all levels. I understand your frustration. I'll have a look at the specific issues later. -- +++$+++ ::{{ec}}It is pretty common for editors to be followed along their contribs if they have been controversial somewhere -that's what the "User contributions" link is for, after all. That it is harassment or simply keeping an eye on a possibly troublesome editor (I'm talking in general) depends very much on the precise situation. About the construction tag, well, it simply seems that you ''unilaterally'' decided it was under construction: since there was no consensus for your overhaul of the article, the tag correctly goes away as well. Again, remember that pseudoscience articles are very tricky since they're a POV battlefield. You seem to be a good faith editor which can add lots of very good content, but don't be carried away -after all the point of a wiki is that our edits can (and will) be challenged or reverted at every time. It is only normal for this to happen, and especially new editors, which often do not know all the nuances of the place, are likely to be bitten by this. In any case you should deal with these editors as you should deal with everyone else: by being civil, by following the rules and by abiding to consensus. Don't be quick in assuming bad faith, again. Wikipedia is an exercise in patience, at all levels. I understand your frustration. I'll have a look at the specific issues later. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 17:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20009 +++$+++ Ocaasi +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20006 +++$+++ 20008 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.296017940E09 +++$+++ A few comments from an outside reader.  HkF (can that be a nickname? seriously confusing names are difficult to reference)...  +++$+++ :::A few comments from an outside reader.  HkF (can that be a nickname? seriously confusing names are difficult to reference)... [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] ([[User talk:Ocaasi|talk]]) 20:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20010 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20006 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.296018600E09 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA abbreviates Hucklebarry Finn's Nigger.  I chose the name based on my childhood role model of sanity.  Now they are trying to delete me for being obscene here[http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/01\/05\/books\/05huck.html?_r=2].    +++$+++ ::::::HkFnsNGA abbreviates Hucklebarry Finn's Nigger.  I chose the name based on my childhood role model of sanity.  Now they are trying to delete me for being obscene here[http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/05/books/05huck.html?_r=2].   [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 21:10, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20011 +++$+++ Ocaasi +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20006 +++$+++ 20008 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.296017940E09 +++$+++ Hope this adds some context.  +++$+++ :::Hope this adds some context. [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] ([[User talk:Ocaasi|talk]]) 20:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20012 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20006 +++$+++ 20011 +++$+++ 2011-01-25 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.296018900E09 +++$+++ I added a talk page section for each new section I added to the article.  As to being \"wordy\", I am a mathematician who used to worship at the [[Mathematical beauty|Temple of Elegance]], but that goddess rejected me, so now I drink from these[http:\/\/www.urbandictionary.com\/products.php?term=diarrhea%20of%20the%20mouth&defid=265034] mugs.   +++$+++ ::::I added a talk page section for each new section I added to the article.  As to being "wordy", I am a mathematician who used to worship at the [[Mathematical beauty|Temple of Elegance]], but that goddess rejected me, so now I drink from these[http://www.urbandictionary.com/products.php?term=diarrhea%20of%20the%20mouth&defid=265034] mugs.  [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 21:15, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
20013 +++$+++ Ocaasi +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20006 +++$+++ 20012 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.296033180E09 +++$+++ Adding 10 talk page sections for 10 major revisions is still a lot to keep track of at once.  I think best practices here would be doing each section maybe one per week, so that changes can be tracked and addressed individually.  As is, it creates a bit of an all or nothing presentation for page-watchers, since they don't even know which edits to start with.  Also, don't get me wrong.  I enjoy being wordy as well... people just won't read your comments around here if you are.  It's a practical issue and nothing else.  ''I read your comments'' and find them interesting.  Most won't get to the interesting parts though.  +++$+++ :::::Adding 10 talk page sections for 10 major revisions is still a lot to keep track of at once.  I think best practices here would be doing each section maybe one per week, so that changes can be tracked and addressed individually.  As is, it creates a bit of an all or nothing presentation for page-watchers, since they don't even know which edits to start with.  Also, don't get me wrong.  I enjoy being wordy as well... people just won't read your comments around here if you are.  It's a practical issue and nothing else.  ''I read your comments'' and find them interesting.  Most won't get to the interesting parts though. [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] ([[User talk:Ocaasi|talk]]) 01:13, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
20014 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20006 +++$+++ 20013 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.296274200E09 +++$+++ Wordiness in talk corrected. Going slow in adding large content and many sections, with proposed sections and content moved to talk for discussion before WP:bolding it in.  +++$+++ ::::::Wordiness in talk corrected. Going slow in adding large content and many sections, with proposed sections and content moved to talk for discussion before WP:bolding it in. [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 20:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
20015 +++$+++ HkFnsNGA +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20006 +++$+++ 20006 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.296274920E09 +++$+++ I appreciate the many well thought out and helpful comments of editors here.  I am following the good advice given to me here.  I appreciate the civility and good intent with which the advice was given to me.  My issue is resolved, and I am putting a resolved tag on this talk page section.  +++$+++ * I appreciate the many well thought out and helpful comments of editors here.  I am following the good advice given to me here.  I appreciate the civility and good intent with which the advice was given to me.  My issue is resolved, and I am putting a resolved tag on this talk page section. [[User:HkFnsNGA|HkFnsNGA]] ([[User talk:HkFnsNGA|talk]]) 20:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

282151 +++$+++ LRBurdak +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282151 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-19 08:32:00 +++$+++ 1.182267120E09 +++$+++ Provide active links so that users can be enriched with your knowledge of history. -- +++$+++ Provide active links so that users can be enriched with your knowledge of history. --[[User:LRBurdak|burdak]] 08:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
282152 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282151 +++$+++ 282151 +++$+++ 2007-06-19 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.182319020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pointing out the links to my books needed updating - the good folks at the University of Washington changed them slightly so the old ones no longer worked. Oh, and by the way, they weren't \"false\" links - just outdated ones.  +++$+++ :Thanks for pointing out the links to my books needed updating - the good folks at the University of Washington changed them slightly so the old ones no longer worked. Oh, and by the way, they weren't "false" links - just outdated ones. [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 22:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

576246 +++$+++ Thomas Basboll +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576246 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-30 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.199079240E09 +++$+++ Hi MONGO, the normal NPOV dispute procedure is to tag it and then explain your issues on the talk page. Please do.--[[User:Thomas Basboll|Thomas Basboll]] ([[User talk:Thomas Basboll|talk]]) 21:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC) UPDATE: I've gone ahead and started a section based on your edit summary.-- +++$+++ Hi MONGO, the normal NPOV dispute procedure is to tag it and then explain your issues on the talk page. Please do.--[[User:Thomas Basboll|Thomas Basboll]] ([[User talk:Thomas Basboll|talk]]) 21:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC) UPDATE: I've gone ahead and started a section based on your edit summary.--[[User:Thomas Basboll|Thomas Basboll]] ([[User talk:Thomas Basboll|talk]]) 21:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
576247 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576246 +++$+++ 576246 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.199356440E09 +++$+++ Thanks Casliber...happy new year.-- +++$+++ :Thanks Casliber...happy new year.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 02:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

20016 +++$+++ JuanR +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-22 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.298434200E09 +++$+++ Thanks by your collaboration.  +++$+++ Thanks by your collaboration. [[User:JuanR|JuanR]] ([[User talk:JuanR|talk]]) 20:10, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
20017 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20016 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-23 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.298449260E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I didn't answer (and now I can't either) due to having been really busy in real life. I can't answer to all your questions since I don't think to have been involved in all the edits you talk about. I hope to manage to have time tomorrow. -- +++$+++ ::Sorry, I didn't answer (and now I can't either) due to having been really busy in real life. I can't answer to all your questions since I don't think to have been involved in all the edits you talk about. I hope to manage to have time tomorrow. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 00:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
20018 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20016 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-23 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.298449680E09 +++$+++ Fixed the \"published a publication\" redundancy. For the rest, let's wait tomorrow. -- +++$+++ :::Fixed the "published a publication" redundancy. For the rest, let's wait tomorrow. --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 00:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
20019 +++$+++ JuanR +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20016 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-23 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.298490000E09 +++$+++ Thank you by doing now at least one of the corrections that I have been requiring since the day 7.  +++$+++ :::: Thank you by doing now at least one of the corrections that I have been requiring since the day 7. [[User:JuanR|JuanR]] ([[User talk:JuanR|talk]]) 11:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

20021 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-11 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.299907800E09 +++$+++ They also are trying to remove the notability, relevance, and self-identification criteria at [[WT:EGRS]], but that's another fight for another day, I'm simply too busy to watch two fronts at the same time.<br \/>-- +++$+++ They also are trying to remove the notability, relevance, and self-identification criteria at [[WT:EGRS]], but that's another fight for another day, I'm simply too busy to watch two fronts at the same time.<br />--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] ([[User talk:William Allen Simpson|talk]]) 21:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
20022 +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ Cyclopia +++$+++ 20021 +++$+++ 20021 +++$+++ 2011-03-12 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.299960120E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the notice but... are you aware that I ''agree wholeheartedly'' with removing such criteria from EGRS, isn't it? -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the notice but... are you aware that I ''agree wholeheartedly'' with removing such criteria from EGRS, isn't it? --[[User:Cyclopia|<font color="green">Cycl</font><big>o</big><font color="green">pia</font>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<font color="red"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 12:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

533138 +++$+++ Andretalierciom +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533138 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-24 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.206407100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Andretalierciom|Andretalierciom]] ([[User talk:Andretalierciom|talk]]) 18:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
533139 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533138 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-24 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.206407280E09 +++$+++ The problem is that the article was deleted in the AfD process. A repost of deleted content qualifies for deletion automatically, unless you bring up new reasons. So the correct procedure is to nominate it at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]]. You should go there and ask to reconsider the deletion of the article (provide strong arguments also). The whole process is explained there but feel free to ask me if anything is unclear. --''' +++$+++ :: The problem is that the article was deleted in the AfD process. A repost of deleted content qualifies for deletion automatically, unless you bring up new reasons. So the correct procedure is to nominate it at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]]. You should go there and ask to reconsider the deletion of the article (provide strong arguments also). The whole process is explained there but feel free to ask me if anything is unclear. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

491992 +++$+++ Glenfarclas +++$+++ Vegaswikian +++$+++ 491992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-17 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.263797940E09 +++$+++ FYI, following up on what you pointed out at the AfD I left [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:JB50000&diff=338448786&oldid=338132874 this comment] at [[User talk:JB50000]].  +++$+++ FYI, following up on what you pointed out at the AfD I left [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JB50000&diff=338448786&oldid=338132874 this comment] at [[User talk:JB50000]]. [[User:Glenfarclas|<span style="background:#003F87;color:#EDEDED" vlink="color:#EDEDED">'''&nbsp;'''Glenfarclas'''&nbsp;</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Glenfarclas|<span style="color:#003F87">talk</span>]]) 22:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
491993 +++$+++ Matt Lewis +++$+++ Vegaswikian +++$+++ 491992 +++$+++ 491992 +++$+++ 2010-01-18 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.263805380E09 +++$+++ ascertain whether there is support for a 'two-phase' poll at the eventual RfC (not far off now), where CDA will finally be put to the community.  +++$+++ * ascertain whether there is support for a 'two-phase' poll at the eventual RfC (not far off now), where CDA will finally be put to the community. [[User:Matt Lewis|Matt Lewis]] ([[User talk:Matt Lewis|talk]]) 01:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

20026 +++$+++ Ninetyone +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ 20026 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-18 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.292729040E09 +++$+++ Just to remind you, as the apparent creator of the article on the article on the Ship Spotting World wiki, that reusing Wikipedia's content does have some terms and conditions, available here: [[Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content]]. Also, on the subject of the AfD - don't get too personally involved! Hrafn isn't on a personal crusade to get you (though I know life can feel like that sometimes)! I think he's probably right in a few respects, and I'm going to try and do a summarising post to explain why, but again - please don't look on an AfD as a pitched battle between you and all comers - it's not supposed to be like that!  +++$+++ Just to remind you, as the apparent creator of the article on the article on the Ship Spotting World wiki, that reusing Wikipedia's content does have some terms and conditions, available here: [[Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content]]. Also, on the subject of the AfD - don't get too personally involved! Hrafn isn't on a personal crusade to get you (though I know life can feel like that sometimes)! I think he's probably right in a few respects, and I'm going to try and do a summarising post to explain why, but again - please don't look on an AfD as a pitched battle between you and all comers - it's not supposed to be like that! [[User:Ninetyone|ninety]]:[[User talk:Ninetyone|one]]  <small>(reply on my talk)</small> 19:24, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
20027 +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ 20026 +++$+++ 20026 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.292731920E09 +++$+++ I wrote both articles and have contributed them equally to both web sites. I could equally argue that Wikipedia is reusing Ship Spotting World's articles.  +++$+++ :I wrote both articles and have contributed them equally to both web sites. I could equally argue that Wikipedia is reusing Ship Spotting World's articles. [[User:Timtrent|Fiddle Faddle]] ([[User talk:Timtrent#top|talk]]) 20:12, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
20028 +++$+++ Ninetyone +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ 20026 +++$+++ 20027 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.292736660E09 +++$+++ Well as soon as text is submitted, it's subject to the copyright permissions of that site - so either way, it needs some attribution. Perhaps a general statement, on both, that the article is available on the other? The important part is that the contribution histories are at least linked somewhere.  +++$+++ ::Well as soon as text is submitted, it's subject to the copyright permissions of that site - so either way, it needs some attribution. Perhaps a general statement, on both, that the article is available on the other? The important part is that the contribution histories are at least linked somewhere. [[User:Ninetyone|ninety]]:[[User talk:Ninetyone|one]]  <small>(reply on my talk)</small> 21:31, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
20029 +++$+++ Ninetyone +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ 20026 +++$+++ 20028 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.292736780E09 +++$+++ I spoke too soon - just seen the talk page notes. That should be fine!  +++$+++ :::I spoke too soon - just seen the talk page notes. That should be fine! [[User:Ninetyone|ninety]]:[[User talk:Ninetyone|one]]  <small>(reply on my talk)</small> 21:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
20030 +++$+++ Ninetyone +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ 20026 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.292742240E09 +++$+++ On the technical point, it is of course arguable that up until [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=NCI_Froward_Point&action=historysubmit&diff=402035379&oldid=402031840 my edit], you were the sole holder of the copyright, that from then onwards, it ceased to be solely your copyright, because I had re-used the material, altered it and published it (the exact manner in which I did so not being relevant), and, therefore when you submitted the article to SSW for the first time, it was already not solely yours. Again, I am not stating this as fact, but it is merely an argument that could conceivably be put forward - hope this adds to the complexity!  +++$+++ :::::On the technical point, it is of course arguable that up until [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NCI_Froward_Point&action=historysubmit&diff=402035379&oldid=402031840 my edit], you were the sole holder of the copyright, that from then onwards, it ceased to be solely your copyright, because I had re-used the material, altered it and published it (the exact manner in which I did so not being relevant), and, therefore when you submitted the article to SSW for the first time, it was already not solely yours. Again, I am not stating this as fact, but it is merely an argument that could conceivably be put forward - hope this adds to the complexity! [[User:Ninetyone|ninety]]:[[User talk:Ninetyone|one]]  <small>(reply on my talk)</small> 23:04, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
20031 +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ 20026 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-18 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.292743260E09 +++$+++ If I choose when I place my copyright work somewhere else to adopt the correction of \"is\" with \"if\" that you also performed then we could spend a while discussing whether I infringed your copyright or simply made the same coincidental edit. However t a court of law would throw the case out as having no merit either way.  +++$+++ ::::::If I choose when I place my copyright work somewhere else to adopt the correction of "is" with "if" that you also performed then we could spend a while discussing whether I infringed your copyright or simply made the same coincidental edit. However t a court of law would throw the case out as having no merit either way. [[User:Timtrent|Fiddle Faddle]] ([[User talk:Timtrent#top|talk]]) 23:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

483935 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-07 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.197065220E09 +++$+++ Shameless spamming, so far just limited to a couple of articles. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/66.186.131.116][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/AmericanLifeTV]  +++$+++ Shameless spamming, so far just limited to a couple of articles. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/66.186.131.116][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/AmericanLifeTV] [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 14:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
483936 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483935 +++$+++ 483935 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.197070740E09 +++$+++ I left a warning.  If it recurs, we'll escalate and eventually block.  (I don't typically block spammers as fast as vandals since it's more often an understanding).  \u2014 +++$+++ :I left a warning.  If it recurs, we'll escalate and eventually block.  (I don't typically block spammers as fast as vandals since it's more often an understanding).  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 15:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
483937 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483935 +++$+++ 483936 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.197072000E09 +++$+++ I reverted the Hill Street one 4 times, and he seems to have gotten the hint, or else is on a tea break.  +++$+++ ::I reverted the Hill Street one 4 times, and he seems to have gotten the hint, or else is on a tea break. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 16:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

544316 +++$+++ Reinoutr +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544316 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.187539800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your nice comment Tim, I'll have a look into the Wikiprojects. As I am going for FA with the exosome article, comments on the article are more than welcome here: [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Exosome (RNA degradation machinery)]]. -- +++$+++ Thanks for your nice comment Tim, I'll have a look into the Wikiprojects. As I am going for FA with the exosome article, comments on the article are more than welcome here: [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Exosome (RNA degradation machinery)]]. --[[User:Reinoutr|Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr)]] 09:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
544317 +++$+++ Reinoutr +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544316 +++$+++ 544316 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.187564220E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I posted a notice in the help section of both Wikiprojects. -- +++$+++ :Thanks, I posted a notice in the help section of both Wikiprojects. --[[User:Reinoutr|Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr)]] 15:57, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
544318 +++$+++ Reinoutr +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544316 +++$+++ 544317 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.187616900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your thorough copy editing of the exosome article, I've replied also on the FAC page. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for your thorough copy editing of the exosome article, I've replied also on the FAC page. --[[User:Reinoutr|Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr)]] 06:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

282175 +++$+++ Sikh historian +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282175 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-21 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.185004200E09 +++$+++ Sikhism is not a ethnic religion so for example if you are Chinese & Sikh and you set-up a kingdom - if then someone says your ethnic blood origin is Sikh is completely incorrect - that is your religion. Your ethnicity is still Chinese. The same thing applies if you set-up a kingdom and are Jat in ethnicity but Sikh in religion. If someone says your ethnic blood origin is Jat this is correct but you practice Sikhism as your religion. Maharaja Ranjit Singh was Sandhawalia Jat. Maharaja Ranjit Singh wasn't even a baptised Sikh ([[Khalsa]]) and drank alcohol, had a Muslim wife Moran, many mistresses - completely against Sikhism. Nabha, Jind, Patiala were of Phool Jats branch (Sidhu Jat clan) ethnic origin. -- +++$+++ Sikhism is not a ethnic religion so for example if you are Chinese & Sikh and you set-up a kingdom - if then someone says your ethnic blood origin is Sikh is completely incorrect - that is your religion. Your ethnicity is still Chinese. The same thing applies if you set-up a kingdom and are Jat in ethnicity but Sikh in religion. If someone says your ethnic blood origin is Jat this is correct but you practice Sikhism as your religion. Maharaja Ranjit Singh was Sandhawalia Jat. Maharaja Ranjit Singh wasn't even a baptised Sikh ([[Khalsa]]) and drank alcohol, had a Muslim wife Moran, many mistresses - completely against Sikhism. Nabha, Jind, Patiala were of Phool Jats branch (Sidhu Jat clan) ethnic origin. --[[User:Sikh historian|Sikh historian]] 00:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
282176 +++$+++ Sikh-history +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282175 +++$+++ 282175 +++$+++ 2008-05-16 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.210971540E09 +++$+++ Hi Sikh Historian. Some nice points, but let us not forget, if the Guru Hargobind had not chastised the Bhullars, Dhaliwal, Bhatti and other Rajput tribes there would be no Patiala, Nabha or Jind state today. Thanks-- +++$+++ : Hi Sikh Historian. Some nice points, but let us not forget, if the Guru Hargobind had not chastised the Bhullars, Dhaliwal, Bhatti and other Rajput tribes there would be no Patiala, Nabha or Jind state today. Thanks--[[User:Sikh-history|Sikh-history]] ([[User talk:Sikh-history|talk]]) 13:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

20032 +++$+++ Lidos +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ 20032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-23 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.293153660E09 +++$+++ In 2006 you added two pics to the above entry, but anon user 78.146.63.200 has said they are on the wrong side of the road, so I have temporarily commented them out. See [[Surbiton_Lagoon&action=history]]. I will check with members of the Lidos History Society (a yahoo group) and some old A-Z London Atlases, and then re-edit. (Copy on entry Talk page.)-- +++$+++ In 2006 you added two pics to the above entry, but anon user 78.146.63.200 has said they are on the wrong side of the road, so I have temporarily commented them out. See [[Surbiton_Lagoon&action=history]]. I will check with members of the Lidos History Society (a yahoo group) and some old A-Z London Atlases, and then re-edit. (Copy on entry Talk page.)--[[User:Lidos|Lidos]] ([[User talk:Lidos|talk]]) 17:21, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
20033 +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ 20032 +++$+++ 20032 +++$+++ 2010-12-27 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.293522180E09 +++$+++ They were taken of the position that the map led me to believe was correct. I have no issue with being incorrect though.  +++$+++ :They were taken of the position that the map led me to believe was correct. I have no issue with being incorrect though. [[User:Timtrent|Fiddle Faddle]] ([[User talk:Timtrent#top|talk]]) 23:43, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
20034 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ 20032 +++$+++ 20032 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.296214860E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing![[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  03:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
20035 +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ 20032 +++$+++ 20032 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.296241440E09 +++$+++ That works for me, Thank you.  +++$+++ :That works for me, Thank you. [[User:Timtrent|Fiddle Faddle]] ([[User talk:Timtrent#top|talk]]) 11:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

454577 +++$+++ GoingBatty +++$+++ Deb +++$+++ 454577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-10 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.307771820E09 +++$+++ Hi Deb! In [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=1991_in_music&action=historysubmit&diff=409806346&oldid=409605511 this edit] to [[1991 in music]], it appears you meant to add the May 3 death of an Egyptian singer, but the name of the singer seems to be missing.  Could you please correct this edit?  Thanks so much, and happy editing!   +++$+++ Hi Deb! In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1991_in_music&action=historysubmit&diff=409806346&oldid=409605511 this edit] to [[1991 in music]], it appears you meant to add the May 3 death of an Egyptian singer, but the name of the singer seems to be missing.  Could you please correct this edit?  Thanks so much, and happy editing!  [[User:GoingBatty|GoingBatty]] ([[User talk:GoingBatty|talk]]) 22:57, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
454578 +++$+++ GoingBatty +++$+++ Deb +++$+++ 454577 +++$+++ 454577 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.307916540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your quick response!   +++$+++ :Thanks for your quick response!  [[User:GoingBatty|GoingBatty]] ([[User talk:GoingBatty|talk]]) 15:09, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

282179 +++$+++  +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Dear John Hill, WP never stops to amaze me, its only been 60 sec since I added a sentence, and I've got a feedback... I've got the book through ILL, from a Ca university, ISBN 9985-441-52-9, sorry for my omission, I just added ISBN. BTW, I was hunting for Zuev's books for a couple of years, seems that they were all burnt, his name erased, even Russian Academy of Sciences library does not have any of his publications. If you need more help, I will be happy to do what I can. Barefact 05:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ Dear John Hill, WP never stops to amaze me, its only been 60 sec since I added a sentence, and I've got a feedback... I've got the book through ILL, from a Ca university, ISBN 9985-441-52-9, sorry for my omission, I just added ISBN. BTW, I was hunting for Zuev's books for a couple of years, seems that they were all burnt, his name erased, even Russian Academy of Sciences library does not have any of his publications. If you need more help, I will be happy to do what I can. Barefact 05:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
282180 +++$+++ Barefact +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282179 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-22 06:16:00 +++$+++ 1.185110160E09 +++$+++ For aborigenes from the Australian booneys we always make a special break :-). Can you please e-mail me? It would make things easier to handle :-).  +++$+++ :::For aborigenes from the Australian booneys we always make a special break :-). Can you please e-mail me? It would make things easier to handle :-). [[User:Barefact|Barefact]] 06:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

20036 +++$+++ TenPoundHammer +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ 20036 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-26 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.298730000E09 +++$+++ You created [[Wikipedia:WikiProject King George's Fields]] a long time ago and almost nothing ever happened there. Was wondering if you had anything to say about that since I [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion\/Wikipedia:WikiProject King George's Fields|nominated it for deletion]]. <span style=\"color:green\">Ten Pound Hammer<\/span>, [[Special:Contributions\/TenPoundHammer|his otters]] and a clue-bat \u2022 <sup>( +++$+++ You created [[Wikipedia:WikiProject King George's Fields]] a long time ago and almost nothing ever happened there. Was wondering if you had anything to say about that since I [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject King George's Fields|nominated it for deletion]]. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, [[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|his otters]] and a clue-bat • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otters want attention]])</sup> 06:20, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
20037 +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ Timtrent +++$+++ 20036 +++$+++ 20036 +++$+++ 2011-02-26 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.298789580E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I commented there.  +++$+++ :Thanks. I commented there. [[User:Timtrent|Fiddle Faddle]] ([[User talk:Timtrent#top|talk]]) 22:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

282181 +++$+++ Sikh historian +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-23 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.185258900E09 +++$+++ Dear John can you help. Please can you apply the same rigour you have applied to the Jat people article on the [[Porus]] article there is user (User:Intothefire) saying King [[Porus]] was from the [[Kukhran]] according to Oral history. I mean come on this outrageous to even post something like this on Wikipedia without any references or verifiable references but say ORAL HISTORY says he was from the Kukhran is appalling. I am Indian and there is NO scholar or University academic who says he was from the some fringe group called the Kukhran. Most Indian academics would be appalled by this falsehood and unsubstantiated claim. Please take this up immediately and apply you regular rigour to this article - absolutely appalling abuse of Wikipedia.-- +++$+++ Dear John can you help. Please can you apply the same rigour you have applied to the Jat people article on the [[Porus]] article there is user (User:Intothefire) saying King [[Porus]] was from the [[Kukhran]] according to Oral history. I mean come on this outrageous to even post something like this on Wikipedia without any references or verifiable references but say ORAL HISTORY says he was from the Kukhran is appalling. I am Indian and there is NO scholar or University academic who says he was from the some fringe group called the Kukhran. Most Indian academics would be appalled by this falsehood and unsubstantiated claim. Please take this up immediately and apply you regular rigour to this article - absolutely appalling abuse of Wikipedia.--[[User:Sikh historian|Sikh historian]] 23:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
282182 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282181 +++$+++ 282181 +++$+++ 2007-07-24 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.185290040E09 +++$+++ Dear Sikh Historian: I have just had a look at the article on [[Porus]] and it seems there is no longer any mention of the Kukhran in it - so there does not seem to be any need to do anything about it at the moment. The \"oral history\" regarding Porus is mentioned in the article on the [[Kukhran]] but there is a proper \"citation needed\" tag on it and it was only entered in June. So, I don't think anything need be done about it until either a citation is found or a significant time has gone by with no citations forthcoming. I will, however, keep a watch on these pages and comment if and when I think I may have something useful or pertinent to add. Best wishes,  +++$+++ :Dear Sikh Historian: I have just had a look at the article on [[Porus]] and it seems there is no longer any mention of the Kukhran in it - so there does not seem to be any need to do anything about it at the moment. The "oral history" regarding Porus is mentioned in the article on the [[Kukhran]] but there is a proper "citation needed" tag on it and it was only entered in June. So, I don't think anything need be done about it until either a citation is found or a significant time has gone by with no citations forthcoming. I will, however, keep a watch on these pages and comment if and when I think I may have something useful or pertinent to add. Best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 08:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

20039 +++$+++ Parvazbato59 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20039 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-03 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.238800800E09 +++$+++ Dear user, Your recent edit in [[common cold]] was reverted, since there was no solid discussion on \"Alternative treatment for common cold\" on the talk page of this article as you mentioned there is, in your \"edit summary\". In your edit, you deleted a large section and just claimed that such treatment does not exist. Well, although I may agree with you, but I should mention that we can not just delete a section and add out self idea. The section that you deleted also had references. What you can do, is you add your statement with its citation to the previouse section but please do not delete statements from the articles without a solid discussion. I appreciate your attention  +++$+++ Dear user, Your recent edit in [[common cold]] was reverted, since there was no solid discussion on "Alternative treatment for common cold" on the talk page of this article as you mentioned there is, in your "edit summary". In your edit, you deleted a large section and just claimed that such treatment does not exist. Well, although I may agree with you, but I should mention that we can not just delete a section and add out self idea. The section that you deleted also had references. What you can do, is you add your statement with its citation to the previouse section but please do not delete statements from the articles without a solid discussion. I appreciate your attention [[User:Parvazbato59|Parvazbato59]] ([[User talk:Parvazbato59|talk]]) 16:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
20040 +++$+++ Parvazbato59 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20039 +++$+++ 20039 +++$+++ 2009-04-03 16:32:00 +++$+++ 1.238801520E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you discussed it in another article [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Alternative_treatments_used_for_the_common_cold here]. This is the problem. One can not address an issue on another article and simply delete a section by addressing it there. But I am sure you were unaware of it. What you can do, is to do the same discussion in the talk page of common cold by opeining a new section and naming it \"Alternative treatment for common cold\". Then you can modify the text under that section, but still, '''I insist you can not delete the statements with references, eventhough they are against what we think\". I know that alternative treatments maynot be scientific, but '''as you know, some of the medicines that we use today, come from the common \"herbs\"'''. Sicnece is not perfect. Thanks  +++$+++ * I noticed that you discussed it in another article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alternative_treatments_used_for_the_common_cold here]. This is the problem. One can not address an issue on another article and simply delete a section by addressing it there. But I am sure you were unaware of it. What you can do, is to do the same discussion in the talk page of common cold by opeining a new section and naming it "Alternative treatment for common cold". Then you can modify the text under that section, but still, '''I insist you can not delete the statements with references, eventhough they are against what we think". I know that alternative treatments maynot be scientific, but '''as you know, some of the medicines that we use today, come from the common "herbs"'''. Sicnece is not perfect. Thanks [[User:Parvazbato59|Parvazbato59]] ([[User talk:Parvazbato59|talk]]) 16:32, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

282184 +++$+++ ReluctantPhilosopher +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-25 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.185390900E09 +++$+++ Keep up the good work!! Regards -- +++$+++ Keep up the good work!! Regards --[[User:ReluctantPhilosopher|Amit]] 12:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
282185 +++$+++ ReluctantPhilosopher +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282184 +++$+++ 282184 +++$+++ 2007-07-25 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.185402660E09 +++$+++ I hope you noticed the \"Vandal whacking stick\" too :D --  +++$+++ : I hope you noticed the "Vandal whacking stick" too :D -- [[User:ReluctantPhilosopher|Amit]] 15:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

20041 +++$+++ Eldereft +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20041 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-20 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.240267980E09 +++$+++ Any time the two of you feel like concentrating on the issue at hand instead of each other would be fine by me. I just collapsed the ''completely'' off-topic comments, but if you happened to feel like removing the [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] and other [[WP:TALK|unproductive text]] from ''your'' remaining comments, that would be nice. Either striking the text or replacing it with a brief note to that effect might improve the mood of that page. Thank you. -  +++$+++ Any time the two of you feel like concentrating on the issue at hand instead of each other would be fine by me. I just collapsed the ''completely'' off-topic comments, but if you happened to feel like removing the [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] and other [[WP:TALK|unproductive text]] from ''your'' remaining comments, that would be nice. Either striking the text or replacing it with a brief note to that effect might improve the mood of that page. Thank you. - [[User talk:Eldereft|Eldereft]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/Eldereft|cont.]])</small> 15:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
20042 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20041 +++$+++ 20041 +++$+++ 2009-04-20 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.240291860E09 +++$+++ I've been trying to discuss content all along, I just haven't had much luck. I admit that, at times, I was unable to resist the temptation to respond in kind to the insults that started immediately upon my arrival, and for that I apologize to those stuck reading the off-topic comments. I agree completely with what you've collapsed. Indeed a lot more could be collapsed. If I have the time to do so, I will try to strike out some of my more off-topic statements that still remain. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :I've been trying to discuss content all along, I just haven't had much luck. I admit that, at times, I was unable to resist the temptation to respond in kind to the insults that started immediately upon my arrival, and for that I apologize to those stuck reading the off-topic comments. I agree completely with what you've collapsed. Indeed a lot more could be collapsed. If I have the time to do so, I will try to strike out some of my more off-topic statements that still remain. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 22:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
20043 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20041 +++$+++ 20042 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.240301340E09 +++$+++ Complete. There were some spots where striking things would have concealed a substantive point, so I may have left a few things that I otherwise would have removed. It also made me see that, towards the end (the last few days), my frustration was showing a lot more than it had been before. Good exercise. Also the reason I took 12 hours away from the site today. Thanks, Eldereft - I actually didn't realize this was a good - or even acceptable - thing to do. I appreciate the tip, and whether others follow suit or not, I'm glad I did it. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ ::Complete. There were some spots where striking things would have concealed a substantive point, so I may have left a few things that I otherwise would have removed. It also made me see that, towards the end (the last few days), my frustration was showing a lot more than it had been before. Good exercise. Also the reason I took 12 hours away from the site today. Thanks, Eldereft - I actually didn't realize this was a good - or even acceptable - thing to do. I appreciate the tip, and whether others follow suit or not, I'm glad I did it. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 01:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
20044 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20041 +++$+++ 20043 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.240302000E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, Ratel has [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Ratel&diff=prev&oldid=285132797 erased your comment] on his talk page, and stated that nothing he said on IC\/PBS was off-topic. Again, I'm still glad I redacted my off-topic text. But - and I mean this in all sincerity, so please understand these aren't meant as insults, but just observations - I don't know how to deal with someone behaving like Ratel within the parameters of WP. If I sink to their level, that's clearly no good. If I ignore them, I might as well not even try to improve an article with an editor like this \"camped out.\" And I can't spend all my time in WQAs and RfCs - that's both a waste of time, and no fun at all. Do you have any advice? --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :::Unfortunately, Ratel has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ratel&diff=prev&oldid=285132797 erased your comment] on his talk page, and stated that nothing he said on IC/PBS was off-topic. Again, I'm still glad I redacted my off-topic text. But - and I mean this in all sincerity, so please understand these aren't meant as insults, but just observations - I don't know how to deal with someone behaving like Ratel within the parameters of WP. If I sink to their level, that's clearly no good. If I ignore them, I might as well not even try to improve an article with an editor like this "camped out." And I can't spend all my time in WQAs and RfCs - that's both a waste of time, and no fun at all. Do you have any advice? --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 01:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
20045 +++$+++ Eldereft +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20041 +++$+++ 20044 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.240372440E09 +++$+++ Also, sorry for the high level of snarkiness in my opening comment; I had just finished reading that talkpage. Hopefully we all can be a little calmer and more rational from here on in. -  +++$+++ :::: Also, sorry for the high level of snarkiness in my opening comment; I had just finished reading that talkpage. Hopefully we all can be a little calmer and more rational from here on in. - [[User talk:Eldereft|Eldereft]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/Eldereft|cont.]])</small> 20:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
20046 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20041 +++$+++ 20045 +++$+++ 2009-04-23 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.240481280E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Eldereft. And don't worry - the snarkiness was appropriate given what you'd just waded through. Hopefully we'll get a few extra eyes on the IC debate, get it settled, and move forward. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :::::Thanks, Eldereft. And don't worry - the snarkiness was appropriate given what you'd just waded through. Hopefully we'll get a few extra eyes on the IC debate, get it settled, and move forward. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 03:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

544331 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-25 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.188032100E09 +++$+++ I tried it myself; if you have a moment, and if there's anything you can do to help [[User:SandyGeorgia\/Sandbox2#Causes]], it's all Greek to me (just regurgitating the sources).  Feel free to operate in my sandbox if you're able to add anything.  Best,  +++$+++ I tried it myself; if you have a moment, and if there's anything you can do to help [[User:SandyGeorgia/Sandbox2#Causes]], it's all Greek to me (just regurgitating the sources).  Feel free to operate in my sandbox if you're able to add anything.  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
544332 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544331 +++$+++ 544331 +++$+++ 2007-08-25 02:22:00 +++$+++ 1.188033720E09 +++$+++ Beautiful, thanks so much.   +++$+++ :Beautiful, thanks so much.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

544333 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-30 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.188518220E09 +++$+++ Tim, would you be able to review the wikilinking at [[Asperger_syndrome#Mechanism]]?  I'm not sure where to start searching for some terms, although we may have gotten most of it.   +++$+++ Tim, would you be able to review the wikilinking at [[Asperger_syndrome#Mechanism]]?  I'm not sure where to start searching for some terms, although we may have gotten most of it.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
544334 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544333 +++$+++ 544333 +++$+++ 2007-09-01 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.188694380E09 +++$+++ AS is completely rewritten now, tweaking and refinement of text pending.  My summary\/response to current issues on talk is at [[Talk:Asperger syndrome#SG multiple responses]].  Best,  +++$+++ :AS is completely rewritten now, tweaking and refinement of text pending.  My summary/response to current issues on talk is at [[Talk:Asperger syndrome#SG multiple responses]].  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:53, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

20047 +++$+++ Scramblecase +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20047 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-21 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.240315140E09 +++$+++ Hi, Transity - I placed a \"final\" note on the WQA regarding Ratel, explaining my intention to look into filing an RfC concerning him.  I know you've expressed that you don't wish to spend all your time on WQAs and RfCs, but as far as I can see, one user alone can't pursue an RfC against another user.  I'm reluctant to ask (or include, unasked) Collect in these proceedings, as his presence seems to distract from the issue of Ratel's behavior; I, myself, may be \"poison\" to the proceedings at this point, as you are the only user I've thus far encountered who shares my opinion of the ridiculous [[WP:SPA]] accusations.  I'm also admittedly new here, and despite my aptitude for research (which, as we all know, clearly indicates that I am a sockpuppet), I wouldn't mind a more experienced user or two taking the helm on this.  If you agree that Ratel's behavior, his refusal to cooperate in the WQA, and his continued behavior (as evidenced in your further dealings on the IC discussion) require the attention of others, perhaps one or the other of us might be able to find additional users to assist in the filing of the RfC.  Feel free to reply here or on my Talk page regarding this issue.  (And good luck on the IC Talk page - I'm not sure what more I can do to help matters there, unfortunately.)  +++$+++ Hi, Transity - I placed a "final" note on the WQA regarding Ratel, explaining my intention to look into filing an RfC concerning him.  I know you've expressed that you don't wish to spend all your time on WQAs and RfCs, but as far as I can see, one user alone can't pursue an RfC against another user.  I'm reluctant to ask (or include, unasked) Collect in these proceedings, as his presence seems to distract from the issue of Ratel's behavior; I, myself, may be "poison" to the proceedings at this point, as you are the only user I've thus far encountered who shares my opinion of the ridiculous [[WP:SPA]] accusations.  I'm also admittedly new here, and despite my aptitude for research (which, as we all know, clearly indicates that I am a sockpuppet), I wouldn't mind a more experienced user or two taking the helm on this.  If you agree that Ratel's behavior, his refusal to cooperate in the WQA, and his continued behavior (as evidenced in your further dealings on the IC discussion) require the attention of others, perhaps one or the other of us might be able to find additional users to assist in the filing of the RfC.  Feel free to reply here or on my Talk page regarding this issue.  (And good luck on the IC Talk page - I'm not sure what more I can do to help matters there, unfortunately.) [[User:Scramblecase|Scramblecase]] ([[User talk:Scramblecase|talk]]) 04:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
20048 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20047 +++$+++ 20047 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.240370820E09 +++$+++ So again, please do let me know if you move forward with an RfC, and I will do the same for you (as part of a larger notice to all interested parties). --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :So again, please do let me know if you move forward with an RfC, and I will do the same for you (as part of a larger notice to all interested parties). --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 20:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
20049 +++$+++ Flowanda +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20047 +++$+++ 20048 +++$+++ 2009-04-23 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.240479180E09 +++$+++ Arcayne has some good advice [[User talk:Esasus#Ease up|here]]. You don't have to solve a problem like Ratel; just succinctly document your efforts and move on. It's okay to leave a mess for another editor else to deal with. Really.  +++$+++ ::Arcayne has some good advice [[User talk:Esasus#Ease up|here]]. You don't have to solve a problem like Ratel; just succinctly document your efforts and move on. It's okay to leave a mess for another editor else to deal with. Really. [[User:Flowanda|Flowanda]] | [[User talk:Flowanda|Talk]] 02:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
20050 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20047 +++$+++ 20049 +++$+++ 2009-04-23 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.240541100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your input, Flowanda. I think I'll give it a go, and try to get back to editing content and actually enjoying myself here. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :::Thanks for your input, Flowanda. I think I'll give it a go, and try to get back to editing content and actually enjoying myself here. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 19:45, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

282192 +++$+++ Anthon.Eff +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-18 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.187427180E09 +++$+++ Nice photographs! I noticed that the caption in the article ([[Kurds in Turkey]]) for the horseman at Lake Van gives the date as 1974, but the description from the photograph itself gives the date as 1993. Should be consistent...  -- +++$+++ Nice photographs! I noticed that the caption in the article ([[Kurds in Turkey]]) for the horseman at Lake Van gives the date as 1974, but the description from the photograph itself gives the date as 1993. Should be consistent...  --[[User:Anthon.Eff|Anthon.Eff]] 01:53, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
282193 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282192 +++$+++ 282192 +++$+++ 2007-08-18 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.187427720E09 +++$+++ Wow, that was quick! I had just uploaded 4 or 5 photos and put the wrong date (1974) on each of them and was in the process of correcting the captions when you wrote. They actually were all taken taken in 1973. Put it down to \"Old Timer's Disease\"! I should change the date in the full titles of the photos - not just the captions - but I am not sure how to do it - so have just added a note to each. Anyway, I am glad you enjoyed the photos. I hope to add more when I can find the time - they have got slightly damaged and pretty faded and need a bit of editing before I upload them. All best wishes,  +++$+++ :Wow, that was quick! I had just uploaded 4 or 5 photos and put the wrong date (1974) on each of them and was in the process of correcting the captions when you wrote. They actually were all taken taken in 1973. Put it down to "Old Timer's Disease"! I should change the date in the full titles of the photos - not just the captions - but I am not sure how to do it - so have just added a note to each. Anyway, I am glad you enjoyed the photos. I hope to add more when I can find the time - they have got slightly damaged and pretty faded and need a bit of editing before I upload them. All best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 02:02, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
282194 +++$+++ Meowy +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282192 +++$+++ 282193 +++$+++ 2007-12-20 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.198214520E09 +++$+++ Can you be more precise about the location of the \"Image:Armenian_gravestones._Lake_Van._.JPG\" picture. Is it to the south-west of Van city, above Edremit, and overlooking lake Van, perhaps? I photographed the remains of a graveyard in that location this year, and it seems to be in the same location as your photo, based on the mountains in the background. If it is, then the gravestones you photographed no longer exist. If it is the same site, I would be interested to know if you have more photographs of it, or of the ruined church that was located close to the graveyard in the district of Edremit called Sarmansuyu.  +++$+++ ::Can you be more precise about the location of the "Image:Armenian_gravestones._Lake_Van._.JPG" picture. Is it to the south-west of Van city, above Edremit, and overlooking lake Van, perhaps? I photographed the remains of a graveyard in that location this year, and it seems to be in the same location as your photo, based on the mountains in the background. If it is, then the gravestones you photographed no longer exist. If it is the same site, I would be interested to know if you have more photographs of it, or of the ruined church that was located close to the graveyard in the district of Edremit called Sarmansuyu. [[User:Meowy|<font face="Trebuchet MS, verdana, sans serif" color="#0088BB">'''Meowy'''</font>]] 21:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

544338 +++$+++ BirgitteSB +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544338 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-27 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.188262500E09 +++$+++ In looking this article over there is one main point that confuses me.  ''In eukaryotes these redox reactions are carried out by a series of protein complexes in mitochondria, called the electron transport chain. In prokaryotes, these proteins are located in the cells' inner membranes.''  I read this to mean that electron tranport chains can only occur in michondria and that prokaryotes do not use the electron transport chain.  But reading further in the article, this undrstanding appears either incorrect or else prokaryotes are being neglected.  Do prokaryotes use the electron transport chain?--<i><font color=\"#9966FF\"> +++$+++ In looking this article over there is one main point that confuses me.  ''In eukaryotes these redox reactions are carried out by a series of protein complexes in mitochondria, called the electron transport chain. In prokaryotes, these proteins are located in the cells' inner membranes.''  I read this to mean that electron tranport chains can only occur in michondria and that prokaryotes do not use the electron transport chain.  But reading further in the article, this undrstanding appears either incorrect or else prokaryotes are being neglected.  Do prokaryotes use the electron transport chain?--<i><font color="#9966FF">[[User:BirgitteSB|Birgitte]]</font><font color="#CC99CC" size="2">SB</font></i> 17:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
544339 +++$+++ BirgitteSB +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544338 +++$+++ 544338 +++$+++ 2007-08-27 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.188271200E09 +++$+++ This is a bit technical for me but I think I can manage it.--<i><font color=\"#9966FF\"> +++$+++ :This is a bit technical for me but I think I can manage it.--<i><font color="#9966FF">[[User:BirgitteSB|Birgitte]]</font><font color="#CC99CC" size="2">SB</font></i> 20:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

20051 +++$+++ JaGa +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20051 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-11 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.242103320E09 +++$+++ If it's any consolation, I've had the theme to the Rockford Files stuck in my head all day :) -- +++$+++ If it's any consolation, I've had the theme to the Rockford Files stuck in my head all day :) --[[User:JaGa|<b><font color="#990000">Ja</font><font color="#000099">Ga</font></b>]][[User_talk:JaGa|<font color="#000000" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 21:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
20052 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20051 +++$+++ 20051 +++$+++ 2009-05-11 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.242104280E09 +++$+++ No worries. The fixes are still made - I just don't have a tally for those changes. Not a big deal at all. In a dynamic environment, things like this are bound to happen. Glad to hear you've got the [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Px_nrsFNgtI Rockford Files theme song] playing in your head - sorry to confess that's why I picked that example! Cheers. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :No worries. The fixes are still made - I just don't have a tally for those changes. Not a big deal at all. In a dynamic environment, things like this are bound to happen. Glad to hear you've got the [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Px_nrsFNgtI Rockford Files theme song] playing in your head - sorry to confess that's why I picked that example! Cheers. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 21:58, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
20053 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20051 +++$+++ 20051 +++$+++ 2009-06-06 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.244344020E09 +++$+++ I see you added the links again to the [[Butea superba]] article. Please don't continue to do that as it violates Wikipedia policies, as I described above. Please feel free to add links to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] documenting the effects of Butea in general (see the guidelines on [[WP:MEDRS|good medical sources]]), but there's no reason to promote or even mention this particular brand of Butea supplement that I can see. Read the policies that I've linked to here and I think you'll agree. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :I see you added the links again to the [[Butea superba]] article. Please don't continue to do that as it violates Wikipedia policies, as I described above. Please feel free to add links to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] documenting the effects of Butea in general (see the guidelines on [[WP:MEDRS|good medical sources]]), but there's no reason to promote or even mention this particular brand of Butea supplement that I can see. Read the policies that I've linked to here and I think you'll agree. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 20:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

544340 +++$+++ BirgitteSB +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544340 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-29 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.188436920E09 +++$+++ I posted my review.  Good work!  It was a bit beyond my educaton, but I enjoyed figuring it out.--<i><font color=\"#9966FF\"> +++$+++ I posted my review.  Good work!  It was a bit beyond my educaton, but I enjoyed figuring it out.--<i><font color="#9966FF">[[User:BirgitteSB|Birgitte]]</font><font color="#CC99CC" size="2">SB</font></i> 18:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
544341 +++$+++ BirgitteSB +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544340 +++$+++ 544340 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.188446820E09 +++$+++ No hurry.  I think I was reviewing a version of the article before your most recent fixes as some of my comment echo the ones you responded to in the reviewer above me.--<i><font color=\"#9966FF\"> +++$+++ :No hurry.  I think I was reviewing a version of the article before your most recent fixes as some of my comment echo the ones you responded to in the reviewer above me.--<i><font color="#9966FF">[[User:BirgitteSB|Birgitte]]</font><font color="#CC99CC" size="2">SB</font></i> 21:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
544342 +++$+++ BirgitteSB +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544340 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.188610500E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on the FA!  What's next? :)--<i><font color=\"#9966FF\"> +++$+++ :::Congratulations on the FA!  What's next? :)--<i><font color="#9966FF">[[User:BirgitteSB|Birgitte]]</font><font color="#CC99CC" size="2">SB</font></i> 18:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

265486 +++$+++ Aguerriero +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-23 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.161652860E09 +++$+++ May I asked what your criteria is for placing this template on articles?  I noticed that you just tagged [[Robert Johnson]], which is completely cited via [[Wikipedia:Harvard referencing|Harvard referencing]].  Articles are not required to use footnote citations; that is only one of three possible citation methods.  I suggest that you stop blanketing articles with this template without first devising a strategy and ensuring that each article is deserving of the template.  Perhaps you can collaborate at an appropriate WikiProject?  It may even be less disruptive to develop a list of articles that need citations as a subpage of a WikiProject, so the editors who are most likely to improve the articles can easily reference it.  Thanks --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ May I asked what your criteria is for placing this template on articles?  I noticed that you just tagged [[Robert Johnson]], which is completely cited via [[Wikipedia:Harvard referencing|Harvard referencing]].  Articles are not required to use footnote citations; that is only one of three possible citation methods.  I suggest that you stop blanketing articles with this template without first devising a strategy and ensuring that each article is deserving of the template.  Perhaps you can collaborate at an appropriate WikiProject?  It may even be less disruptive to develop a list of articles that need citations as a subpage of a WikiProject, so the editors who are most likely to improve the articles can easily reference it.  Thanks --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Aguerriero|Aguerriero]] ([[User_talk:Aguerriero|talk]])</font> 18:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
265487 +++$+++ TomTheHand +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265486 +++$+++ 265486 +++$+++ 2006-08-22 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.156284420E09 +++$+++ Please have a look at [[2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict]], which is a well-cited article.  Check out the text after the introduction section, or look at the infobox.  The little numbers by various facts, which link to lines in the [[2006 Israel-Lebanon Crisis#References|references section]], are citations.  Specifically, they are done in the [[Wikipedia:Footnotes|footnote]] style, but you can use one of the other citation methods on [[WP:CITE]] if you like; as your quote states, it's up to you.  Note that nowhere on [[WP:CITE]] will you find the \"list a bunch of links at the bottom of the page\" method, because that is not ''citation''.  If you need help, please let me know.  +++$+++ :Please have a look at [[2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict]], which is a well-cited article.  Check out the text after the introduction section, or look at the infobox.  The little numbers by various facts, which link to lines in the [[2006 Israel-Lebanon Crisis#References|references section]], are citations.  Specifically, they are done in the [[Wikipedia:Footnotes|footnote]] style, but you can use one of the other citation methods on [[WP:CITE]] if you like; as your quote states, it's up to you.  Note that nowhere on [[WP:CITE]] will you find the "list a bunch of links at the bottom of the page" method, because that is not ''citation''.  If you need help, please let me know. [[User:TomTheHand|TomTheHand]] 15:07, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
265488 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265486 +++$+++ 265486 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.161655680E09 +++$+++ And to clarify, I am not blanketing every article I come across. In this particular instance, I was adding a link to the page of each inductee on the 1980 Blues Foundation Hall of Fame inductee list. As I went down that list, I noted and tagged the articles that were unsourced, since they were all old articles and sourcing them seemed to be forgotten. That is all. I did add some footnote citations to [[Memphis Minnie]]. And as I mentioned to you on your talk page, yesterday I wrote an article on a blues guitarist and I have recently fixed up the pages of other blues people and groups. So I think your characterization of me is unfair.  +++$+++ :And to clarify, I am not blanketing every article I come across. In this particular instance, I was adding a link to the page of each inductee on the 1980 Blues Foundation Hall of Fame inductee list. As I went down that list, I noted and tagged the articles that were unsourced, since they were all old articles and sourcing them seemed to be forgotten. That is all. I did add some footnote citations to [[Memphis Minnie]]. And as I mentioned to you on your talk page, yesterday I wrote an article on a blues guitarist and I have recently fixed up the pages of other blues people and groups. So I think your characterization of me is unfair. [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 19:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
265489 +++$+++ Aguerriero +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265486 +++$+++ 265488 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.161656100E09 +++$+++ Hmm.. I'm not sure what TomTheHand is replying to - his comment makes little sense to me out of context.  What I am saying is that you seem to be looking for footnotes in articles, but that is not the only way to cite sources.  Many articles (such as [[Robert Johnson]]) use [[Wikipedia:Harvard referencing|Harvard referencing]] or inline HTML citations.  In the case of Harvard referencing, you will not see footnotes (the little numbers); you will see a list of citations at the bottom under the References section.  Does that make more sense?  You seem to be viewing this as a personal attack, but I am simply suggesting that you revise your strategy for placing templates on articles.  Or more to the point, have a strategy. --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ ::Hmm.. I'm not sure what TomTheHand is replying to - his comment makes little sense to me out of context.  What I am saying is that you seem to be looking for footnotes in articles, but that is not the only way to cite sources.  Many articles (such as [[Robert Johnson]]) use [[Wikipedia:Harvard referencing|Harvard referencing]] or inline HTML citations.  In the case of Harvard referencing, you will not see footnotes (the little numbers); you will see a list of citations at the bottom under the References section.  Does that make more sense?  You seem to be viewing this as a personal attack, but I am simply suggesting that you revise your strategy for placing templates on articles.  Or more to the point, have a strategy. --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Aguerriero|Aguerriero]] ([[User_talk:Aguerriero|talk]])</font> 19:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
265490 +++$+++ TomTheHand +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265486 +++$+++ 265489 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.161656220E09 +++$+++ Mattisse, I apologize for always popping into discussions like this, but it's a topic of interest for me; citation and referencing on Wikipedia is often misunderstood.  +++$+++ :::Mattisse, I apologize for always popping into discussions like this, but it's a topic of interest for me; citation and referencing on Wikipedia is often misunderstood. [[User:TomTheHand|TomTheHand]] 19:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
265491 +++$+++ Aguerriero +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265486 +++$+++ 265490 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.161657000E09 +++$+++ Case in point, me. :)  I stand corrected. --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ ::::Case in point, me. :)  I stand corrected. --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Aguerriero|Aguerriero]] ([[User_talk:Aguerriero|talk]])</font> 19:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
265492 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265486 +++$+++ 265490 +++$+++ 2006-10-23 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.161658140E09 +++$+++ Now, maybe that is what you were doing in [[Robert Johnson]]. As I said, I find that particular article very difficult to follow.   +++$+++ ::::Now, maybe that is what you were doing in [[Robert Johnson]]. As I said, I find that particular article very difficult to follow.  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 19:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

20054 +++$+++ MarcusMaximus +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20054 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-08 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.244507700E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reverting that obnoxious vandalism on my talk page.  How do I bring in an administrator to deal with the vandal?  +++$+++ Thanks for reverting that obnoxious vandalism on my talk page.  How do I bring in an administrator to deal with the vandal? [[User:MarcusMaximus|MarcusMaximus]] ([[User talk:MarcusMaximus|talk]]) 17:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
20055 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20054 +++$+++ 20054 +++$+++ 2009-06-08 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.244512620E09 +++$+++ If I'm around, I will gladly help you with reporting him if you like. I'll also keep an eye on him as a known vandal. I know it sounds like a big pain in the ass to have to go through in order to stop someone from vandalizing your talk page, but it's the best way to stop the vandalism. Above all, don't let it bother you - these guys are a dime-a-dozen, and their vandalism never lasts long. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :If I'm around, I will gladly help you with reporting him if you like. I'll also keep an eye on him as a known vandal. I know it sounds like a big pain in the ass to have to go through in order to stop someone from vandalizing your talk page, but it's the best way to stop the vandalism. Above all, don't let it bother you - these guys are a dime-a-dozen, and their vandalism never lasts long. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 18:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

544343 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-28 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.188358080E09 +++$+++ I have to run meet my family who's arriving any moment, but [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] alerted me to the failed GA for [[Introduction to evolution]].  I scanned it briefly, and I was concerned that, in addition to any glitches of style and organization, it might also have factual errors and be incomplete on some critical points?  Would you mind looking it over when you have a moment, and seeing what you think?  No hurry, methinks, to leap into the editing fray, but I'd just like to know what your impression was.   Warm mice for L and his mom, and warm regards for you,  +++$+++ I have to run meet my family who's arriving any moment, but [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] alerted me to the failed GA for [[Introduction to evolution]].  I scanned it briefly, and I was concerned that, in addition to any glitches of style and organization, it might also have factual errors and be incomplete on some critical points?  Would you mind looking it over when you have a moment, and seeing what you think?  No hurry, methinks, to leap into the editing fray, but I'd just like to know what your impression was.   Warm mice for L and his mom, and warm regards for you, [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 20:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
544344 +++$+++ Random Replicator +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544343 +++$+++ 544343 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.188418560E09 +++$+++ Tim I think our ctitique was amazingly detailed. Rather than seeing this as a failure; I'm rather pleased at the level of criticism and specifics metioned for improvement.[[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] provided very detailed recommendations.  As you may note in the prior \"failure\" the only criticism was a deficiency of citations (Unfortunately). Which we corrected.  I don't think the article is a disaster, in fact other than the introduction, the article itself held up very well. Bottom -line - nothing - and I mean nothing got by [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]. So most of the suggested edits are very specific. I noticed in the above post - concern over accuracy, There has to be some acceptance of generalization in an introductory level entry. If we start pointing out every exception to insure accuracy we destroy the purpose and goal of creating a layman's version. Of course if anything is an fact in error --- clearly it needs to be fixed. Rather than a complete tear down; I would rather focus on the very specific suggestions [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] provided. I've created a check off list of sorts on the discussion page which should allow us to address his concerns directly. I would be thrilled to have additional assistance. When they are corrected; I am hoping the [[Introduction to Evolution]] will be exceptionally good. I have re-written the introduction to eliminate the redundancy. We left the orignal text and added our own --- I  hate to delete others efforts --- thus the redundacy. I think I fixed that. I hope I'm not implying ownership; if anything my early pleas for help from the Evolution guru's was largely ignored so the three of us were very much on our own. If we focus on the specifics of an incredilble critique then it will be worthy of a companion article to Evolution --- which has dramatically improved --- to which you get much of the credit. So ... the new introduction has been posted; if you would be willing to go back and edit this version as needed I would be grateful. -- +++$+++ :Tim I think our ctitique was amazingly detailed. Rather than seeing this as a failure; I'm rather pleased at the level of criticism and specifics metioned for improvement.[[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] provided very detailed recommendations.  As you may note in the prior "failure" the only criticism was a deficiency of citations (Unfortunately). Which we corrected.  I don't think the article is a disaster, in fact other than the introduction, the article itself held up very well. Bottom -line - nothing - and I mean nothing got by [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]. So most of the suggested edits are very specific. I noticed in the above post - concern over accuracy, There has to be some acceptance of generalization in an introductory level entry. If we start pointing out every exception to insure accuracy we destroy the purpose and goal of creating a layman's version. Of course if anything is an fact in error --- clearly it needs to be fixed. Rather than a complete tear down; I would rather focus on the very specific suggestions [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] provided. I've created a check off list of sorts on the discussion page which should allow us to address his concerns directly. I would be thrilled to have additional assistance. When they are corrected; I am hoping the [[Introduction to Evolution]] will be exceptionally good. I have re-written the introduction to eliminate the redundancy. We left the orignal text and added our own --- I  hate to delete others efforts --- thus the redundacy. I think I fixed that. I hope I'm not implying ownership; if anything my early pleas for help from the Evolution guru's was largely ignored so the three of us were very much on our own. If we focus on the specifics of an incredilble critique then it will be worthy of a companion article to Evolution --- which has dramatically improved --- to which you get much of the credit. So ... the new introduction has been posted; if you would be willing to go back and edit this version as needed I would be grateful. --[[User:Random Replicator|Random Replicator]] 13:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

20057 +++$+++ Dolfrog +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-18 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.245359880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dolfrog|dolfrog]] ([[User talk:Dolfrog|talk]]) 14:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
20058 +++$+++ Gordonofcartoon +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20057 +++$+++ 20057 +++$+++ 2009-06-18 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.245360540E09 +++$+++ See discussion and consensus at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dyslexia#RFC]]. Dolfrog can't\/won't accept the strong consensus that his additions of [[:Category:Dyslexia]] are inappropriate. And I'm getting pretty tired of these personal attacks on my ability to understand topics.  +++$+++ :See discussion and consensus at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dyslexia#RFC]]. Dolfrog can't/won't accept the strong consensus that his additions of [[:Category:Dyslexia]] are inappropriate. And I'm getting pretty tired of these personal attacks on my ability to understand topics. [[User:Gordonofcartoon|Gordonofcartoon]] ([[User talk:Gordonofcartoon|talk]]) 14:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
20059 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20057 +++$+++ 20058 +++$+++ 2009-06-18 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.245361080E09 +++$+++ I just replied to you on the [[Talk:Otitis media#otitis media with effusion|Talk:Otitis media]] page, and suggested this approach. As I said there, if you've got reliable sources to backup what you're saying, then this ''should'' be added to the article. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ ::I just replied to you on the [[Talk:Otitis media#otitis media with effusion|Talk:Otitis media]] page, and suggested this approach. As I said there, if you've got reliable sources to backup what you're saying, then this ''should'' be added to the article. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 14:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

544346 +++$+++ Espresso Addict +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544346 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-29 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.188428040E09 +++$+++ Another great article from the Tim Vickers stable! I'm just typing up a few minor comments for the FAC.  +++$+++ Another great article from the Tim Vickers stable! I'm just typing up a few minor comments for the FAC. [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] 15:54, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
544347 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544346 +++$+++ 544346 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.188522660E09 +++$+++ Ahem, ahem\u2014say what? Another Vickers FAC on the verge of promotion and you didn't even let me know? Shame on you, Tim!  +++$+++ :Ahem, ahem—say what? Another Vickers FAC on the verge of promotion and you didn't even let me know? Shame on you, Tim! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 18:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
544348 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544346 +++$+++ 544347 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.188523980E09 +++$+++ But of course; I'll look as soon as I can. I presume you gave up on Inkscape? ;) Just drop me a line once everyone's satisfied with the pics, I can probably do them over the weekend. Best,  +++$+++ ::But of course; I'll look as soon as I can. I presume you gave up on Inkscape? ;) Just drop me a line once everyone's satisfied with the pics, I can probably do them over the weekend. Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 18:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
544349 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544346 +++$+++ 544348 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.188542100E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Oxidative_phosphorylation&diff=prev&oldid=154692727 Oh, man]! You'd better let me know sooner next time\u2014I didn't even get to comment!  +++$+++ :::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oxidative_phosphorylation&diff=prev&oldid=154692727 Oh, man]! You'd better let me know sooner next time—I didn't even get to comment! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 23:35, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
544350 +++$+++ AshLin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544346 +++$+++ 544349 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.188610980E09 +++$+++ Congrats, Tim. Very well done. This gives me great happiness. Regards,  +++$+++ ::::Congrats, Tim. Very well done. This gives me great happiness. Regards, [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] 18:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

20061 +++$+++ Dolfrog +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-24 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.245881520E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dolfrog|dolfrog]] ([[User talk:Dolfrog|talk]]) 15:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
20062 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20061 +++$+++ 20061 +++$+++ 2009-06-24 15:20:00 +++$+++ 1.245882000E09 +++$+++ No worries. Please check both of my changes for content, though. One part in particular didn't read right. I tried to keep the correct meaning, but please make sure I did. It was the part that discussed \"discrepancy\" tests between IQ and reading level. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :No worries. Please check both of my changes for content, though. One part in particular didn't read right. I tried to keep the correct meaning, but please make sure I did. It was the part that discussed "discrepancy" tests between IQ and reading level. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 15:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

282206 +++$+++ PHG +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-04 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.188914400E09 +++$+++ Hi John, I thought you might be interested in the above article. I am also trying to make it a featured article: you can vote should you wish to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Franco-Mongol_alliance]. Best regards  +++$+++ Hi John, I thought you might be interested in the above article. I am also trying to make it a featured article: you can vote should you wish to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Franco-Mongol_alliance]. Best regards [[User:PHG|PHG]] 07:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
282207 +++$+++ PHG +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282206 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-05 05:13:00 +++$+++ 1.188994380E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much John for your support! I am glad you like the article.  +++$+++ ::Thank you very much John for your support! I am glad you like the article. [[User:PHG|PHG]] 05:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

20064 +++$+++ Dinoceras +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20064 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-09 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.247199000E09 +++$+++ All the best,  +++$+++ All the best, [[User:Dinoceras|Dinoceras]] ([[User talk:Dinoceras|talk]]) 21:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
20065 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20064 +++$+++ 20064 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.247217060E09 +++$+++ (leaving this on [[User_talk:Dinoceras#.22You_have_vandalised.22_message|your talk page]] as well) My best guess is that your ISP assigns IP addresses dynamically, and every 1+ days, you get a new IP address from them. At the time the vandalism was taking place, you had a different IP. Today you had this one, and since your autologin had expired, you saw the message left for the IP user from several weeks back. You already have a login, and you will likely have a new IP soon enough, so I wouldn't worry about it. The problem will take care of itself. Cheers! --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :(leaving this on [[User_talk:Dinoceras#.22You_have_vandalised.22_message|your talk page]] as well) My best guess is that your ISP assigns IP addresses dynamically, and every 1+ days, you get a new IP address from them. At the time the vandalism was taking place, you had a different IP. Today you had this one, and since your autologin had expired, you saw the message left for the IP user from several weeks back. You already have a login, and you will likely have a new IP soon enough, so I wouldn't worry about it. The problem will take care of itself. Cheers! --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 02:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
20066 +++$+++ Dinoceras +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20064 +++$+++ 20065 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.247242320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply.  I hadn't realised that IP addresses were habitually reassigned by ISPs.  A pity, since it means that the original vandal won't be rebuked.  Cheers!  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the reply.  I hadn't realised that IP addresses were habitually reassigned by ISPs.  A pity, since it means that the original vandal won't be rebuked.  Cheers! [[User:Dinoceras|Dinoceras]] ([[User talk:Dinoceras|talk]]) 09:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

544354 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-31 03:46:00 +++$+++ 1.188557160E09 +++$+++ at the [[Homosexuality]] article. I know we've disagreed in the past, but I also know you are more coherent in the life sciences than I am. Presently, a user is trying to get included in the article the notion that there is a direct causal link between homosexuality and pedophilia. The two studies he cited look to me, as does his general view, to be patently [[WP:FRINGE]]. Can you please lend the view of someone who is better equipped to judge the \"mainstream-ness\" of a scientific view?  +++$+++ at the [[Homosexuality]] article. I know we've disagreed in the past, but I also know you are more coherent in the life sciences than I am. Presently, a user is trying to get included in the article the notion that there is a direct causal link between homosexuality and pedophilia. The two studies he cited look to me, as does his general view, to be patently [[WP:FRINGE]]. Can you please lend the view of someone who is better equipped to judge the "mainstream-ness" of a scientific view? [[User:VanTucky|<span style="color:#E49B0F">VanTucky</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:VanTucky|(talk)]]</sup> 03:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
544355 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544354 +++$+++ 544354 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.188557580E09 +++$+++ You were certainly not \"unpleasant\". It was over at the vegan article.  +++$+++ :You were certainly not "unpleasant". It was over at the vegan article. [[User:VanTucky|<span style="color:#E49B0F">VanTucky</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:VanTucky|(talk)]]</sup> 03:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
544356 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544354 +++$+++ 544354 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.188559320E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much Tim. I really appreciate it.  +++$+++ :Thank you so much Tim. I really appreciate it. [[User:VanTucky|<span style="color:#E49B0F">VanTucky</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:VanTucky|(talk)]]</sup> 04:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

20067 +++$+++ Exxolon +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20067 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-12 14:56:00 +++$+++ 1.247435760E09 +++$+++ I've contested the speedy deletion on behalf of the article creator as I've found a NY Times source - see article talk page.  +++$+++ I've contested the speedy deletion on behalf of the article creator as I've found a NY Times source - see article talk page. [[User:Exxolon|Exxolon]] ([[User talk:Exxolon|talk]]) 14:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
20068 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20067 +++$+++ 20067 +++$+++ 2009-07-12 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.247435940E09 +++$+++ Yup, just saw it. The brief mention probably isn't enough to make them notable, but it is enough to reasonably remove the speedy delete tag. I may still AFD it after a while to let others decide if they are notable enough - I'll watch it for now. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :Yup, just saw it. The brief mention probably isn't enough to make them notable, but it is enough to reasonably remove the speedy delete tag. I may still AFD it after a while to let others decide if they are notable enough - I'll watch it for now. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 14:59, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

282212 +++$+++ Fullstop +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282212 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-11 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.189510860E09 +++$+++ <div>Sorry if I must say this, but even from the perspective of someone who does not have the stature of Vesta Curtis (the editor of the book you cite), the arc is being bent beyond breaking point. Troyes was only build in the 18th century, 17 centuries after Gondophares. In any case how exactly was a - probably illiterate - Central-European glass-blower supposed to know what the Central-Asian Gondophares looked like? Even with 20th century technology we can barely make out what Gondophares looked like (\"guy on coin with headband and beard\") and now he's supposed to be clearly identifiable in a cathedral half way around the world? Wow. Sound like right-out-of-Dan Brown. :)<\/div> --  +++$+++ <div>Sorry if I must say this, but even from the perspective of someone who does not have the stature of Vesta Curtis (the editor of the book you cite), the arc is being bent beyond breaking point. Troyes was only build in the 18th century, 17 centuries after Gondophares. In any case how exactly was a - probably illiterate - Central-European glass-blower supposed to know what the Central-Asian Gondophares looked like? Even with 20th century technology we can barely make out what Gondophares looked like ("guy on coin with headband and beard") and now he's supposed to be clearly identifiable in a cathedral half way around the world? Wow. Sound like right-out-of-Dan Brown. :)</div> -- [[User:Fullstop|Fullstop]] 04:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
282213 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282212 +++$+++ 282212 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.189516680E09 +++$+++ However, I am glad you questioned me about the passage as it prodded me to reread the Acts of Thomas and there is no mention of Mary or the \"twin\" in them - only that Thomas (Gk. Diordios = \"twin\") refers to Jesus as his brother. I have, apparently, combined two stories I read some years ago and did not check them closely enough before I wrote the note. Therefore, I have toned down that passage. Cheers and best wishes,  +++$+++ :However, I am glad you questioned me about the passage as it prodded me to reread the Acts of Thomas and there is no mention of Mary or the "twin" in them - only that Thomas (Gk. Diordios = "twin") refers to Jesus as his brother. I have, apparently, combined two stories I read some years ago and did not check them closely enough before I wrote the note. Therefore, I have toned down that passage. Cheers and best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 06:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
282214 +++$+++ Fullstop +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282212 +++$+++ 282213 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.189656180E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ ::Regards, [[User:Fullstop|Fullstop]] 21:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
282215 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282212 +++$+++ 282212 +++$+++ 2007-09-12 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.189661340E09 +++$+++ Hi Fullstop! No, Bivar does not give a source for his claim in his chapter (\"Gondophares and the Indo-Parthians\", pp. 26-36) about the representation of Gondophares - and I have (so far) been unable to find any supportive evidence. Yes, the book has just been published as Vol. II of ''The Idea of Iran'' series in association with The London Middle East Institute at SOAS and The British Museum. Do you have any suggestions as to how we could check on Bivar's claim? Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi Fullstop! No, Bivar does not give a source for his claim in his chapter ("Gondophares and the Indo-Parthians", pp. 26-36) about the representation of Gondophares - and I have (so far) been unable to find any supportive evidence. Yes, the book has just been published as Vol. II of ''The Idea of Iran'' series in association with The London Middle East Institute at SOAS and The British Museum. Do you have any suggestions as to how we could check on Bivar's claim? Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 22:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
282216 +++$+++ Fullstop +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282212 +++$+++ 282215 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 03:09:00 +++$+++ 1.189678140E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ ::-- [[User:Fullstop|Fullstop]] 03:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
282217 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282212 +++$+++ 282212 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.189705200E09 +++$+++ Hi again! Thanks for doing all that checking. I, too, have been unable to discover anything more about the representation of Gondophares at Troyes so I have written to Prof. Bivar to ask him if he has any references or other info. So, I think I may leave it all there until I here from him (maybe it will stir another reader to reply as well). I have also repaired the ISBN number on the book - thanks for pointing out the faulty link. Cheers and best wishes,  +++$+++ :Hi again! Thanks for doing all that checking. I, too, have been unable to discover anything more about the representation of Gondophares at Troyes so I have written to Prof. Bivar to ask him if he has any references or other info. So, I think I may leave it all there until I here from him (maybe it will stir another reader to reply as well). I have also repaired the ISBN number on the book - thanks for pointing out the faulty link. Cheers and best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 10:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
282218 +++$+++ Fullstop +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282212 +++$+++ 282217 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.189731720E09 +++$+++ good idea. Please post a heads-up on my talk page when he replies. Thanks. --  +++$+++ ::good idea. Please post a heads-up on my talk page when he replies. Thanks. -- [[User:Fullstop|Fullstop]] 18:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

20069 +++$+++ Narthring +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-13 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.247485440E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to mention that I looked at the two articles, Fairbank and Charleston, Arizona, that you requested input on.  They both look really good.  There hasn't been a lot of activity on the Ghost Town Wikiproject lately and it's good to see new contributions to the project.  Keep up the good work! +++$+++ I just wanted to mention that I looked at the two articles, Fairbank and Charleston, Arizona, that you requested input on.  They both look really good.  There hasn't been a lot of activity on the Ghost Town Wikiproject lately and it's good to see new contributions to the project.  Keep up the good work![[User:Narthring|Narthring]] ([[User talk:Narthring|talk]]  • [[Special:Contributions/Narthring|contribs]]) 04:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
20070 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20069 +++$+++ 20069 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.247519520E09 +++$+++ Thanks! The extra eyes are appreciated. I plan to work on more ghost towns in Arizona (probably Harshaw and Mowry next), and if I find more information on [[Charleston, Arizona|Charleston]] and [[Fairbank, Arizona|Fairbank]], I'll expand them further as well. Thanks, again. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :Thanks! The extra eyes are appreciated. I plan to work on more ghost towns in Arizona (probably Harshaw and Mowry next), and if I find more information on [[Charleston, Arizona|Charleston]] and [[Fairbank, Arizona|Fairbank]], I'll expand them further as well. Thanks, again. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 14:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

544358 +++$+++ Sushant gupta +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-01 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.188672420E09 +++$+++ Actually I wrote this article as a summary type article. kindly see [[WP:SS]]. Should I mention the list of articles from where i took the content on the talk page. Actually my main objective was to create a page where we can get all the content regarding the evolutionary history of life. thanks,  +++$+++ Actually I wrote this article as a summary type article. kindly see [[WP:SS]]. Should I mention the list of articles from where i took the content on the talk page. Actually my main objective was to create a page where we can get all the content regarding the evolutionary history of life. thanks, [[User:Sushant gupta|Sushant gupta]] 11:47, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
544359 +++$+++ Sushant gupta +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544358 +++$+++ 544358 +++$+++ 2007-09-01 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.188673380E09 +++$+++ hope so won't mean to delete the page. see, the page is recently created. if you want to some improvements then ask me. i will try my best to improve this article. one more thing; i am just 15 years kid. that is why don't expect much from me. also biology is not my field. thanks,  +++$+++ : hope so won't mean to delete the page. see, the page is recently created. if you want to some improvements then ask me. i will try my best to improve this article. one more thing; i am just 15 years kid. that is why don't expect much from me. also biology is not my field. thanks, [[User:Sushant gupta|Sushant gupta]] 12:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
544360 +++$+++ Sushant gupta +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544358 +++$+++ 544359 +++$+++ 2007-09-02 02:03:00 +++$+++ 1.188723780E09 +++$+++ I have mentioned the whole list on the article's talk page. Kindly have a look please. Ummhhh... do you want me to add some more content which you expect me do myself without taking any stuff from wikipedia itself. if that is the issue it might take a few weeks to do so. though i won't mind anyway. thanks,  +++$+++ :: I have mentioned the whole list on the article's talk page. Kindly have a look please. Ummhhh... do you want me to add some more content which you expect me do myself without taking any stuff from wikipedia itself. if that is the issue it might take a few weeks to do so. though i won't mind anyway. thanks, [[User:Sushant gupta|Sushant gupta]] 02:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

20074 +++$+++ Accounting4Taste +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-30 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.249013160E09 +++$+++ I just wanted to note your good work in trying to help the creator of this article; you definitely assumed good faith and tried to help, but I came across the article in the course of assessing another article for speedy deletion and I have to say that I cannot imagine that the article will ever be able to provide any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that demonstrate any [[WP:N|notability]].  I did a brief search and found nothing whatever that gave me any confidence that the individuals have anything other than a YouTube account and a desire for self-promotion.  Nevertheless, you were doing things the way that I would like to do them myself on my better days, and I thought it deserved to be recognized.   +++$+++ I just wanted to note your good work in trying to help the creator of this article; you definitely assumed good faith and tried to help, but I came across the article in the course of assessing another article for speedy deletion and I have to say that I cannot imagine that the article will ever be able to provide any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that demonstrate any [[WP:N|notability]].  I did a brief search and found nothing whatever that gave me any confidence that the individuals have anything other than a YouTube account and a desire for self-promotion.  Nevertheless, you were doing things the way that I would like to do them myself on my better days, and I thought it deserved to be recognized.  [[User:Accounting4Taste|Accounting4Taste]]:<small>[[User talk:Accounting4Taste|talk]]</small> 21:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
20075 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20074 +++$+++ 20074 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.249076820E09 +++$+++ Actually, thank ''you'' for taking the time to spell out your thought process here. You were right, of course, to re-tag for speedy delete. The author had plenty of time to show reliable sources and notability, and it was time to re-tag (it was on my watchlist, and I likely would have done so shortly). I guess it was the author's willingness to actually engage in a discussion that caused me to assume good faith - most of the time, disputed CSDs are never defended at all, and a willingness to discuss the issues usually makes me want to pause to hear the arguments. Thanks for the nod, and for taking the time to explain why you were doing what you did. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :Actually, thank ''you'' for taking the time to spell out your thought process here. You were right, of course, to re-tag for speedy delete. The author had plenty of time to show reliable sources and notability, and it was time to re-tag (it was on my watchlist, and I likely would have done so shortly). I guess it was the author's willingness to actually engage in a discussion that caused me to assume good faith - most of the time, disputed CSDs are never defended at all, and a willingness to discuss the issues usually makes me want to pause to hear the arguments. Thanks for the nod, and for taking the time to explain why you were doing what you did. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 14:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

282219 +++$+++ Fullstop +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.193290740E09 +++$+++ (unindent) John, whats the status on this? Have you received a reply from Bivar? --  +++$+++ (unindent) John, whats the status on this? Have you received a reply from Bivar? -- [[User:Fullstop|Fullstop]] 22:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
282220 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282219 +++$+++ 282219 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.193293200E09 +++$+++ Hi! Yes, I wrote to Bivar but never received a reply - so now I am not sure what to do about this. I am thinking of posting a query on the Lonely Planet website to see if anyone can check it out for me. Will let you know, of course, if and when I hear anything. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi! Yes, I wrote to Bivar but never received a reply - so now I am not sure what to do about this. I am thinking of posting a query on the Lonely Planet website to see if anyone can check it out for me. Will let you know, of course, if and when I hear anything. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 23:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
282221 +++$+++ Fullstop +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282219 +++$+++ 282220 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.193294400E09 +++$+++ Well, what exactly are you going to ask for? --  +++$+++ ::Well, what exactly are you going to ask for? -- [[User:Fullstop|Fullstop]] 23:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

20076 +++$+++ User F203 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20076 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-31 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.249104300E09 +++$+++ I wrote about the wrong person.  I meant the CEO of the other Griffon Corp.  Both are defense contractors but French is the CEO of the small Griffon, not the large one.  Very confusing!  +++$+++ I wrote about the wrong person.  I meant the CEO of the other Griffon Corp.  Both are defense contractors but French is the CEO of the small Griffon, not the large one.  Very confusing! [[User:User F203|User F203]] ([[User talk:User F203|talk]]) 22:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
20077 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20076 +++$+++ 20076 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.249104540E09 +++$+++ Well, I know ''I'm'' confused! Now the page redirects to a baseball player...? My advice would be to work on the page in a sandbox, then publish it when you're ready. Putting it out there as such a short stub (sub-stub, really) makes it hard to see that it should be kept. Thanks. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :Well, I know ''I'm'' confused! Now the page redirects to a baseball player...? My advice would be to work on the page in a sandbox, then publish it when you're ready. Putting it out there as such a short stub (sub-stub, really) makes it hard to see that it should be kept. Thanks. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 22:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

282222 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-24 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.193295120E09 +++$+++ Will let you know if and when I hear anything. Cheers,  +++$+++ Will let you know if and when I hear anything. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 23:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
282223 +++$+++ Fullstop +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282222 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.196469540E09 +++$+++ Any news on this front? --  +++$+++ ::Any news on this front? -- [[User:Fullstop|Fullstop]] 16:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
282224 +++$+++ Fullstop +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282222 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-12-01 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.196496120E09 +++$+++ Anyway, please give me a day or two to mull over how best to deal with it. Thanks. --  +++$+++ ::Anyway, please give me a day or two to mull over how best to deal with it. Thanks. -- [[User:Fullstop|Fullstop]] 00:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

20079 +++$+++ Bearian +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20079 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-04 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.249435020E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised.  Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}<\/code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed Deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy Deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> Sorry about the template!  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised.  Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed Deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy Deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> Sorry about the template! [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 18:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
20080 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20079 +++$+++ 20079 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.249435260E09 +++$+++ No worries about the template. As the person who added the CSD that is now replaced by this PROD, I appreciate the head's up. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :No worries about the template. As the person who added the CSD that is now replaced by this PROD, I appreciate the head's up. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 18:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

20081 +++$+++ GDallimore +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-05 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.249504860E09 +++$+++ Hi. Just wanted to drop you a line to make absolutely clear that my decision to take the Edge article off my watchlist had nothing to do with you. It was while investigating the stuff about his directorship with the gaming association that I realised I did not want to be involved. Best of luck! Hope you get some more eyes from BLP.  +++$+++ Hi. Just wanted to drop you a line to make absolutely clear that my decision to take the Edge article off my watchlist had nothing to do with you. It was while investigating the stuff about his directorship with the gaming association that I realised I did not want to be involved. Best of luck! Hope you get some more eyes from BLP. [[User:GDallimore|GDallimore]] ([[User talk:GDallimore|Talk]]) 13:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
20082 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 2009-08-05 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.249509600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the assistance on the trademark issues. If you see anything else that is simply wrong there, please feel free to drop me a line here if you don't want to get involved with actively editing. Either way, best of luck to you. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :Thanks for the assistance on the trademark issues. If you see anything else that is simply wrong there, please feel free to drop me a line here if you don't want to get involved with actively editing. Either way, best of luck to you. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 15:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
20083 +++$+++ GDallimore +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 20082 +++$+++ 2009-08-05 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.249512060E09 +++$+++ Didn't think I could handle the wikistress at the moment :). On the trademark front, I think I corrected the main error which was why I decided to remove the disputed template. Just look out for things like \"world trademark\", which probably means \"trademark rights in many countries\". Also, one thing I didn't get around to saying before I vamoosed, be careful using gaming sites as reliable sources for issues of law - they might be reliable about games and gaming news, but that doesn't make them qualified to comment on the legality of ethics of trademark usage\/abusage. I think the article could benefit by explaining in more general terms that games developers are angered by his actions rather than picking over all the things that those angry games developers are complaining about.  +++$+++ ::Didn't think I could handle the wikistress at the moment :). On the trademark front, I think I corrected the main error which was why I decided to remove the disputed template. Just look out for things like "world trademark", which probably means "trademark rights in many countries". Also, one thing I didn't get around to saying before I vamoosed, be careful using gaming sites as reliable sources for issues of law - they might be reliable about games and gaming news, but that doesn't make them qualified to comment on the legality of ethics of trademark usage/abusage. I think the article could benefit by explaining in more general terms that games developers are angered by his actions rather than picking over all the things that those angry games developers are complaining about. [[User:GDallimore|GDallimore]] ([[User talk:GDallimore|Talk]]) 15:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
20084 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 20083 +++$+++ 2009-08-05 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.249517580E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I'll keep an eye out for the \"global trademark\" text, and also look at a rewrite of some parts of the article, per what you mentioned above. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :::Thanks. I'll keep an eye out for the "global trademark" text, and also look at a rewrite of some parts of the article, per what you mentioned above. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 17:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
20085 +++$+++ GDallimore +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 20084 +++$+++ 2009-08-05 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.249519320E09 +++$+++ It's totally up to you now, that's merely what my next comment on the talk page would have been!  +++$+++ ::::It's totally up to you now, that's merely what my next comment on the talk page would have been! [[User:GDallimore|GDallimore]] ([[User talk:GDallimore|Talk]]) 17:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
20086 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 20085 +++$+++ 2009-08-05 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.249519380E09 +++$+++ Understood. That's all I was looking for. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :::::Understood. That's all I was looking for. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 17:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
20087 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 2009-08-05 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.249520340E09 +++$+++ I have already removed the links that were clearly not acceptable, such as inline links to your site in the text of articles, double links in the refs and the external links, and overly-local statements that didn't belong in the articles. I have left most other links alone, though others have removed some, and others could continue to do so. I urge you to review the guidelines I linked to on your talk page ([[WP:SPAMMER]], [[WP:SPAMLINKS]], [[WP:COI]], [[WP:BFAQ]]) as your actions could well constitute spamming, despite the aim of your site. I think you would agree that you desire more hits for your site, and that adding links to Wikipedia would likely mean more hits. Whether or not you are selling something, you are serving your own agenda by adding these promotional links. In addition, there are guidelines for what sources are [[WP:MEDRS|reliable sources for medical articles]]. You should review these to see if and when your site passes muster. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :I have already removed the links that were clearly not acceptable, such as inline links to your site in the text of articles, double links in the refs and the external links, and overly-local statements that didn't belong in the articles. I have left most other links alone, though others have removed some, and others could continue to do so. I urge you to review the guidelines I linked to on your talk page ([[WP:SPAMMER]], [[WP:SPAMLINKS]], [[WP:COI]], [[WP:BFAQ]]) as your actions could well constitute spamming, despite the aim of your site. I think you would agree that you desire more hits for your site, and that adding links to Wikipedia would likely mean more hits. Whether or not you are selling something, you are serving your own agenda by adding these promotional links. In addition, there are guidelines for what sources are [[WP:MEDRS|reliable sources for medical articles]]. You should review these to see if and when your site passes muster. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 17:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
20088 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 2009-08-05 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.249521660E09 +++$+++ I still think you need to review the links I provided more carefully. You are ''clearly'' editing with a conflict of interest, and your excessive links are ''clearly'' in violation of Wikipedia policies. I urge you to think about that before adding these links again. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :I still think you need to review the links I provided more carefully. You are ''clearly'' editing with a conflict of interest, and your excessive links are ''clearly'' in violation of Wikipedia policies. I urge you to think about that before adding these links again. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 18:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
20089 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.249633920E09 +++$+++ Either way, I will certainly not tag for speedy delete as it was not your intent to blank the page. Thanks. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :Either way, I will certainly not tag for speedy delete as it was not your intent to blank the page. Thanks. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 01:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
20090 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.249679100E09 +++$+++ If you have something more to add to the article, please do so. Otherwise, I will have to submit for deletion via the [[WP:AFD|Articles for Deletion]] process. Thanks. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :If you have something more to add to the article, please do so. Otherwise, I will have to submit for deletion via the [[WP:AFD|Articles for Deletion]] process. Thanks. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 14:05, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
20091 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 20081 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.249690440E09 +++$+++ You are always free to recreate an article that has been deleted. If, at that time, you have reliable sources that show notability, then that version of the article will likely be kept. That said, I once again urge you to read the [[WP:BFAQ|FAQ on businesses]] and the [[WP:COI|guidelines on conflict of interest]]. Your comments and the scope of your edits make it sound like you are writing on behalf of this company, and that is strongly discourage on Wikipedia. If your company truly becomes notable, then others will be compelled to write about it. You should seriously consider your motivations before you contribute to articles on subjects that you are directly connected to. Thank you. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :You are always free to recreate an article that has been deleted. If, at that time, you have reliable sources that show notability, then that version of the article will likely be kept. That said, I once again urge you to read the [[WP:BFAQ|FAQ on businesses]] and the [[WP:COI|guidelines on conflict of interest]]. Your comments and the scope of your edits make it sound like you are writing on behalf of this company, and that is strongly discourage on Wikipedia. If your company truly becomes notable, then others will be compelled to write about it. You should seriously consider your motivations before you contribute to articles on subjects that you are directly connected to. Thank you. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 17:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

544374 +++$+++ Danielfolsom +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-26 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.188190260E09 +++$+++ Hey, sorry it took me so long to get back to you - I completely missed your comment actually - it wasn't until Rockpocket messaged me about it (saying I should accept an offer from \"Tim\" - at which point I went to the admin coaching page and looked for a \"Tim\" but couldn't find one ...) that I finally realized that you had posted - so yeah ... Anyways - I'd be happy to accept your generous offer - as new experiences can never hurt. I know my way around the GAC stuff - however I've never really participated in them - and I'm completely oblivious to the FAC deal - but I can read up on that. I would leave a longer message but i'm a bit pressed for time - so thanks again for the offer and, again, I gladly accept.--<small> +++$+++ Hey, sorry it took me so long to get back to you - I completely missed your comment actually - it wasn't until Rockpocket messaged me about it (saying I should accept an offer from "Tim" - at which point I went to the admin coaching page and looked for a "Tim" but couldn't find one ...) that I finally realized that you had posted - so yeah ... Anyways - I'd be happy to accept your generous offer - as new experiences can never hurt. I know my way around the GAC stuff - however I've never really participated in them - and I'm completely oblivious to the FAC deal - but I can read up on that. I would leave a longer message but i'm a bit pressed for time - so thanks again for the offer and, again, I gladly accept.--<small>[[User:Danielfolsom|<span style="color: #CCFF99; background: #003300">daniel]][[User_talk:Danielfolsom|<span style="color:#FFCCCC; background:#660000">folsom]]</span></span></small> 21:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
544375 +++$+++ Danielfolsom +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544374 +++$+++ 544374 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.188355860E09 +++$+++ Hey  - sorry for how long it's taking me to review a GA - my internet routers SUCKS (it shuts down practically every 10 minutes) and I can never stay on long enough to do much - but as soon as I get that fixed I'll get on the GA--<small> +++$+++ :Hey  - sorry for how long it's taking me to review a GA - my internet routers SUCKS (it shuts down practically every 10 minutes) and I can never stay on long enough to do much - but as soon as I get that fixed I'll get on the GA--<small>[[User:Danielfolsom|<span style="color: #CCFF99; background: #003300">daniel]][[User_talk:Danielfolsom|<span style="color:#FFCCCC; background:#660000">folsom]]</span></span></small> 19:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

282232 +++$+++ Fullstop +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-17 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.190029800E09 +++$+++ Thanks. --  +++$+++ Thanks. -- [[User:Fullstop|Fullstop]] 04:50, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
282233 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282232 +++$+++ 282232 +++$+++ 2007-09-17 05:16:00 +++$+++ 1.190031360E09 +++$+++ Dear Fullstop: Fair enough - your points seem good ones and I accept them - if I do make any further edits I will certainly keep your comments in mind. Thanks for the advice. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Dear Fullstop: Fair enough - your points seem good ones and I accept them - if I do make any further edits I will certainly keep your comments in mind. Thanks for the advice. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 05:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

544378 +++$+++ Danielfolsom +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-03 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.188813540E09 +++$+++ Uhoh - I hope your still on - I could use some help on the talk page - the author is saying that the article only needs one source.--<small> +++$+++ Uhoh - I hope your still on - I could use some help on the talk page - the author is saying that the article only needs one source.--<small>[[User:Danielfolsom|<span style="color: #CCFF99; background: #003300">daniel]][[User_talk:Danielfolsom|<span style="color:#FFCCCC; background:#660000">folsom]]</span></span></small> 02:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
544379 +++$+++ Danielfolsom +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544378 +++$+++ 544378 +++$+++ 2007-09-03 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.188870000E09 +++$+++ Hey - do you by any chance have AIM so I can talk to you a bit about this article?--<small> +++$+++ :Hey - do you by any chance have AIM so I can talk to you a bit about this article?--<small>[[User:Danielfolsom|<span style="color: #CCFF99; background: #003300">daniel]][[User_talk:Danielfolsom|<span style="color:#FFCCCC; background:#660000">folsom]]</span></span></small> 18:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

20092 +++$+++ Oldag07 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-13 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.250197500E09 +++$+++ I think we found the outside sources that you were looking for. . . Take a look.  [[Xenos Christian Fellowship]]  +++$+++ I think we found the outside sources that you were looking for. . . Take a look.  [[Xenos Christian Fellowship]] [[User:Oldag07|Oldag07]] ([[User talk:Oldag07|talk]]) 14:05, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
20093 +++$+++ Oldag07 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20092 +++$+++ 20092 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.250220540E09 +++$+++ Thanks  +++$+++ :Thanks [[User:Oldag07|Oldag07]] ([[User talk:Oldag07|talk]]) 20:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

20094 +++$+++ Jake Wartenberg +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20094 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-26 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.251347580E09 +++$+++ Hello Transity, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of [[Motte (disambiguation)]] - a page you tagged - because: '''Please tell us what to move here using {{tlp|db-move|PAGE TO BE MOVED HERE|REASON FOR MOVE}}.''' Please review the [[WP:CSD|criteria for speedy deletion]] before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. \u2014  +++$+++ Hello Transity, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of [[Motte (disambiguation)]] - a page you tagged - because: '''Please tell us what to move here using {{tlp|db-move|PAGE TO BE MOVED HERE|REASON FOR MOVE}}.''' Please review the [[WP:CSD|criteria for speedy deletion]] before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. — [[User:Jake Wartenberg|<font color="#21421E" face="Harrington">Jake</font>]] [[User talk:Jake Wartenberg|<font color="#21421E" face="Harrington">Wartenberg</font>]] 21:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
20095 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20094 +++$+++ 20094 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.251363120E09 +++$+++ Sorry - I thought I just had to tag for deletion, then complete the move myself. I have re-tagged, in the proper format, with an explanation. In a nutshell, [[Motte (disambiguation)]] should be deleted, and [[Motte]] should be moved to that page. Then [[Motte]] should become a redirect to [[motte-and-bailey]], and [[motte-and-bailey]] should have <nowiki>{{Otheruses|Motte (disambiguation)}}<\/nowiki> added up top. I posted about this on [[Talk:Motte]] a few days back, and received no responses. In short, I fixed several hundred DAB links to [[Motte]] a few months back, and every one of them meant to direct to [[motte-and-bailey]]. In addition, I have watched the page since then, and every added link has followed suit. I think this change will circumvent a lot of DAB links. Thanks. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :Sorry - I thought I just had to tag for deletion, then complete the move myself. I have re-tagged, in the proper format, with an explanation. In a nutshell, [[Motte (disambiguation)]] should be deleted, and [[Motte]] should be moved to that page. Then [[Motte]] should become a redirect to [[motte-and-bailey]], and [[motte-and-bailey]] should have <nowiki>{{Otheruses|Motte (disambiguation)}}</nowiki> added up top. I posted about this on [[Talk:Motte]] a few days back, and received no responses. In short, I fixed several hundred DAB links to [[Motte]] a few months back, and every one of them meant to direct to [[motte-and-bailey]]. In addition, I have watched the page since then, and every added link has followed suit. I think this change will circumvent a lot of DAB links. Thanks. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 01:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

20096 +++$+++ Nyttend +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20096 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-26 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.251352680E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your work with ghost towns, especially converting [[Swansea, Arizona]] from a mess of trivia to a fine-quality article.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your work with ghost towns, especially converting [[Swansea, Arizona]] from a mess of trivia to a fine-quality article. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 22:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
20097 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20096 +++$+++ 20096 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.251363720E09 +++$+++ I also wanted to say thanks for providing an always-needed second set of eyes on many of the articles I've worked on. Some of the information on these old towns can be pretty tough to pin down, and it's good to know that I'm not writing in a vacuum. So thank ''you'' for the help you've given me. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :I also wanted to say thanks for providing an always-needed second set of eyes on many of the articles I've worked on. Some of the information on these old towns can be pretty tough to pin down, and it's good to know that I'm not writing in a vacuum. So thank ''you'' for the help you've given me. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 02:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

571328 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-28 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.167323880E09 +++$+++ Please check your email.  '''[[User:culverin|<font color=\"darkblue\">Culv<\/font>]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ Please check your email.  '''[[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">Culv</font>]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">rin</font>]][[Special:Random|<font color="green">?</font>]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]''' </sup></small> 08:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
571329 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571328 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-03 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.167813060E09 +++$+++ Please check your email. Again  '''[[User:culverin|<font color=\"darkblue\">Culv<\/font>]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::Please check your email. Again  '''[[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">Culv</font>]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">rin</font>]][[Special:Random|<font color="green">?</font>]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]''' </sup></small> 00:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

20098 +++$+++ Ntsimp +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20098 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-27 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.251423120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for helping improve \"my\" articles on Utah ghost towns. I owe you; I'll try to get around to helping out with Arizona.  +++$+++ Thanks for helping improve "my" articles on Utah ghost towns. I owe you; I'll try to get around to helping out with Arizona. [[User:Ntsimp|Ntsimp]] ([[User talk:Ntsimp|talk]]) 18:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
20099 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20098 +++$+++ 20098 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.251423720E09 +++$+++ I'm trying to add the GNIS ref (and associated information) to the articles I'm looking at in Utah, do some general copy-editing if needed, and I'll take a stab at assessing the unassessed articles as well (which, I think, are all articles you've worked on). If you see anything I change\/add\/delete that you're not sure about, by all means drop me a line. And if there's anything you'd like me to take a look at, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :I'm trying to add the GNIS ref (and associated information) to the articles I'm looking at in Utah, do some general copy-editing if needed, and I'll take a stab at assessing the unassessed articles as well (which, I think, are all articles you've worked on). If you see anything I change/add/delete that you're not sure about, by all means drop me a line. And if there's anything you'd like me to take a look at, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 18:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

20100 +++$+++ ESCapade +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-31 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.251715080E09 +++$+++ Please teach me how to improve! I do not see anything wrong with it and i have cited the references. Can you please point out which exact word you see as violating WP? I can start fixing from there, and you are also welcome to edit it. Thank you.  +++$+++ Please teach me how to improve! I do not see anything wrong with it and i have cited the references. Can you please point out which exact word you see as violating WP? I can start fixing from there, and you are also welcome to edit it. Thank you. [[User:ESCapade|ESCapade]] ([[User talk:ESCapade|talk]]) 03:38, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
20101 +++$+++ ESCapade +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20100 +++$+++ 20100 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 04:46:00 +++$+++ 1.251719160E09 +++$+++ I'm waiting for [[User:Kmccoy|Kmccoy]] and [[User:Porqin|Porqin]] to respond. I plan to invite, one by one, all admins involved in its deletion to reply. Thank you for your warning. I really appreciate it.  +++$+++ :I'm waiting for [[User:Kmccoy|Kmccoy]] and [[User:Porqin|Porqin]] to respond. I plan to invite, one by one, all admins involved in its deletion to reply. Thank you for your warning. I really appreciate it. [[User:ESCapade|ESCapade]] ([[User talk:ESCapade|talk]]) 04:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
20102 +++$+++ ESCapade +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20100 +++$+++ 20100 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.251745500E09 +++$+++ Okay, i edit a little. Please comment. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Okay, i edit a little. Please comment. Thanks. [[User:ESCapade|ESCapade]] ([[User talk:ESCapade|talk]]) 12:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
20103 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20100 +++$+++ 20102 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.251747120E09 +++$+++ Will reply on [[User talk:ESCapade|your talk page]]. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ ::Will reply on [[User talk:ESCapade|your talk page]]. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 12:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

544390 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-04 06:53:00 +++$+++ 1.188913980E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, don't know if you missed my note yesterday but I've eventually managed to complete the GA review.  Hope it's suitable.  Cheers for now,  +++$+++ Hi Tim, don't know if you missed my note yesterday but I've eventually managed to complete the GA review.  Hope it's suitable.  Cheers for now, [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] 06:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
544391 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544390 +++$+++ 544390 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.188939060E09 +++$+++ Not a problem, I enjoyed it.   +++$+++ :Not a problem, I enjoyed it.  [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] 13:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
544392 +++$+++ The Rambling Man +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544390 +++$+++ 544391 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.189730880E09 +++$+++ I had to fail it - well past the seven day period of grace and no action taken against my comments...  Just thought I'd let you know.  All the best,  +++$+++ ::I had to fail it - well past the seven day period of grace and no action taken against my comments...  Just thought I'd let you know.  All the best, [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] 17:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

20105 +++$+++ Spritebox +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-04 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.252128420E09 +++$+++ Your petty obsession with enforcing your views on something you obviously know nothing about. Goodbye.  +++$+++ Your petty obsession with enforcing your views on something you obviously know nothing about. Goodbye. [[User:Spritebox|Spritebox]] ([[User talk:Spritebox|talk]]) 22:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
20106 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20105 +++$+++ 20105 +++$+++ 2009-09-04 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.252130100E09 +++$+++ And for the record, I have done a lot of research into the paranormal, so you are incorrect when you say that this is a topic I \"obviously know nothing about.\" Goodbye. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :And for the record, I have done a lot of research into the paranormal, so you are incorrect when you say that this is a topic I "obviously know nothing about." Goodbye. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 22:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

282250 +++$+++ MishaPan +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282250 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-12 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.192241340E09 +++$+++ I really love the photo ''<nowiki>Image:Dalai Lama & Bishop Tutu. Carey Linde.jpg<\/nowiki>'' which you uploaded (right). It shows two great men who have been touched by intense grief and suffering, but have managed to preserve their childlike joy. However, the image page for the photo doesn't give very many details about it other than the photographer and permission. It appears to be a conference of some sort--what was the name of the conference? What organization hosted it? What is the specific date of the photo (more than \"2004\")? This information would be helpful. Thank you very much.  +++$+++ I really love the photo ''<nowiki>Image:Dalai Lama & Bishop Tutu. Carey Linde.jpg</nowiki>'' which you uploaded (right). It shows two great men who have been touched by intense grief and suffering, but have managed to preserve their childlike joy. However, the image page for the photo doesn't give very many details about it other than the photographer and permission. It appears to be a conference of some sort--what was the name of the conference? What organization hosted it? What is the specific date of the photo (more than "2004")? This information would be helpful. Thank you very much. [[User:MishaPan|MishaPan]] 19:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
282251 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282250 +++$+++ 282250 +++$+++ 2007-10-16 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.192535520E09 +++$+++ Hi MishaPan! Sorry I have taken so long to write but I wrote to my friend Carey Linde who took the photo of H.H. the Dalai Lama and Bishop Tutu and he just replied today Oct. 16th saying: \"The info on this photo is that there was a conference in Vancouver in 2004 with noble peace prize winners around the Dalai Lama\u2019s theme for education the heart. I took the picture at a round table event.\" Best wishes,  +++$+++ :Hi MishaPan! Sorry I have taken so long to write but I wrote to my friend Carey Linde who took the photo of H.H. the Dalai Lama and Bishop Tutu and he just replied today Oct. 16th saying: "The info on this photo is that there was a conference in Vancouver in 2004 with noble peace prize winners around the Dalai Lama’s theme for education the heart. I took the picture at a round table event." Best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 04:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

20107 +++$+++ Coldplay Expert +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20107 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-12 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.252802280E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Because of your huge efforts in turning [[Mohave City, Arizona]] from a stub into a real article and for giving me encouragment in making Ghost Town related articles, I herby award you the Ghost towns Barnstar. congratulations! -- +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Because of your huge efforts in turning [[Mohave City, Arizona]] from a stub into a real article and for giving me encouragment in making Ghost Town related articles, I herby award you the Ghost towns Barnstar. congratulations! --[[User:Coldplay Expert|Coldplay Expert]] ([[User talk:Coldplay Expert|talk]]) 17:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
20108 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20107 +++$+++ 20107 +++$+++ 2009-09-12 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.252804020E09 +++$+++ Thanks! I appreciate the recognition. And I hope you continue to write about ghost towns. There are so many red links and missing entries for what I consider to be a fascinating subject. If I can ever be of assistance, just let me know. Thanks. --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :Thanks! I appreciate the recognition. And I hope you continue to write about ghost towns. There are so many red links and missing entries for what I consider to be a fascinating subject. If I can ever be of assistance, just let me know. Thanks. --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 18:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

20110 +++$+++ Coldplay Expert +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20110 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-12 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.252804440E09 +++$+++ Oh and one more thing, how do you make the little maps that show the location of the ghost town and how do you add the corrdinates?-- +++$+++ Oh and one more thing, how do you make the little maps that show the location of the ghost town and how do you add the corrdinates?--[[User:Coldplay Expert|Coldplay Expert]] ([[User talk:Coldplay Expert|talk]]) 18:14, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
20111 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20110 +++$+++ 20110 +++$+++ 2009-09-12 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.252807920E09 +++$+++ My coordinates usually come from the USGS GNIS site (you can follow a ref link then query for a new location). --'''<font color=\"800080\"> +++$+++ :My coordinates usually come from the USGS GNIS site (you can follow a ref link then query for a new location). --'''<font color="800080">[[User:Transity|Transity]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 19:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

20112 +++$+++ Coldplay Expert +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20112 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-13 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.252897200E09 +++$+++ Thanks now Ill be able to add those to my ghost town pages! Oh and PS do you like my signature?--<big> +++$+++ Thanks now Ill be able to add those to my ghost town pages! Oh and PS do you like my signature?--<big>[[User:Coldplay Expert|<font color="SteelBlue" face="Loki Cola">Coldplay</font>]] [[User talk:Coldplay Expert|<font color="Crimson" face="Loki Cola">Expert</font>]]</big> 20:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
20113 +++$+++ Plazak +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20112 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.257997020E09 +++$+++ I was going to give you one of these barnstars for your work on [[List of ghost towns in Arizona]], but I see that someone is more on-the-ball than I.  Your table format makes the list much more useable, and should be the standard for lists of ghost towns.   +++$+++ ::I was going to give you one of these barnstars for your work on [[List of ghost towns in Arizona]], but I see that someone is more on-the-ball than I.  Your table format makes the list much more useable, and should be the standard for lists of ghost towns.  [[User:Plazak|Plazak]] ([[User talk:Plazak|talk]]) 19:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
20114 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20112 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-12 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.258070580E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I saw that format in another article, and figured it would work well for the Arizona list. Thanks for adding some of the many missing details - I try to do some from time to time when I get a chance, but it's a long list! <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :::Thanks. I saw that format in another article, and figured it would work well for the Arizona list. Thanks for adding some of the many missing details - I try to do some from time to time when I get a chance, but it's a long list! <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 16:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

314915 +++$+++ Aminz +++$+++ ElKevbo +++$+++ 314915 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-09 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.160446740E09 +++$+++ Thanks ElKevbo for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=80411841&oldid=80411327 recovering footnotes]. There are some editors who are relentlessly ripping the article. -- +++$+++ Thanks ElKevbo for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=80411841&oldid=80411327 recovering footnotes]. There are some editors who are relentlessly ripping the article. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 19:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
314916 +++$+++ ElKevbo +++$+++ ElKevbo +++$+++ 314915 +++$+++ 314915 +++$+++ 2006-10-09 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.160448600E09 +++$+++ You're welcome!  I hope that the semi-protection will help.  I would feel (and act) differently if this were a content dispute but this appears to be very emotionally-charged and blind editing of a POV with which some editors disagree.  It does appear to be a kind of censorship on the part of some editors as the material in question does appear to be well-sourced and NPOV.  I would even understand (to some tiny degree) if the objectionable material were prominently placed in the article.  But it's all in footnotes where they belong.  In any case, I hope they join us in Talk to work out the issues instead of continuing to edit without discussion.  -- +++$+++ :You're welcome!  I hope that the semi-protection will help.  I would feel (and act) differently if this were a content dispute but this appears to be very emotionally-charged and blind editing of a POV with which some editors disagree.  It does appear to be a kind of censorship on the part of some editors as the material in question does appear to be well-sourced and NPOV.  I would even understand (to some tiny degree) if the objectionable material were prominently placed in the article.  But it's all in footnotes where they belong.  In any case, I hope they join us in Talk to work out the issues instead of continuing to edit without discussion.  --[[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] 19:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

20115 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20115 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-19 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.253399280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the catch. The quote was so long I thought it was just someone else blogging on here, as often happens. We should make the quote stand out better.  +++$+++ Thanks for the catch. The quote was so long I thought it was just someone else blogging on here, as often happens. We should make the quote stand out better. [[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチュ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 15:28, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
20116 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20115 +++$+++ 20115 +++$+++ 2009-09-19 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.253403420E09 +++$+++ Actually, I didn't notice it was a quote at first, either. Then I saw the trailing quotation mark, and wondered where the quote started. So I agree entirely that the quote should be easier to see, or else the entire section should be reworded to use less of the quote. I took a stab at that in the article. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :Actually, I didn't notice it was a quote at first, either. Then I saw the trailing quotation mark, and wondered where the quote started. So I agree entirely that the quote should be easier to see, or else the entire section should be reworded to use less of the quote. I took a stab at that in the article. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 16:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
20117 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20115 +++$+++ 20116 +++$+++ 2009-09-19 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.253404380E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Thanks! [[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチュ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 16:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

20120 +++$+++ DigitalC +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20120 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-21 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.258870200E09 +++$+++ Your recent [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Chiropractic_controversy_and_criticism&action=historysubmit&diff=327052773&oldid=327042091 revert] was against Wikiepedia's [[WP:EL|guideline on external links]]. Please provide your justification for putting dead links and other external links which break [[WP:EL]] on the talk page.  +++$+++ Your recent [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chiropractic_controversy_and_criticism&action=historysubmit&diff=327052773&oldid=327042091 revert] was against Wikiepedia's [[WP:EL|guideline on external links]]. Please provide your justification for putting dead links and other external links which break [[WP:EL]] on the talk page. [[User:DigitalC|DigitalC]] ([[User talk:DigitalC|talk]]) 22:10, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
20121 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20120 +++$+++ 20120 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.258889280E09 +++$+++ Finally, in no way was my edit contrary to [[WP:EL]], so please refrain from tossing around baseless accusations. There's no reason why a civil discussion cannot take place on these links, and the best way to ensure that is to remember to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]. I've long since given up the notion that science and reason trump Wikipedia guidelines, so if there's a link that violates a Wikipedia policy, I'll agree that it should be removed, regardless of whether the link is in line with or against my personal views. [[WP:EL]] can be pretty open to interpretation, though, and it intentionally leaves some room for exceptions, so the cases may not be as clear cut as you'd like. Keep that in mind, and make your case on the talk page. I'll agree with you if your case is strong. And as a piece of advice, try to avoid large-scale deletions like the ones your made without at least some sort of discussion (or at least make one change per edit with a clear edit summary to make it obvious why you removed each item, and to allow individual reverts instead of bulk ones). They almost always end up getting reverted, even on articles less controversial than this one. Thanks. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :Finally, in no way was my edit contrary to [[WP:EL]], so please refrain from tossing around baseless accusations. There's no reason why a civil discussion cannot take place on these links, and the best way to ensure that is to remember to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]. I've long since given up the notion that science and reason trump Wikipedia guidelines, so if there's a link that violates a Wikipedia policy, I'll agree that it should be removed, regardless of whether the link is in line with or against my personal views. [[WP:EL]] can be pretty open to interpretation, though, and it intentionally leaves some room for exceptions, so the cases may not be as clear cut as you'd like. Keep that in mind, and make your case on the talk page. I'll agree with you if your case is strong. And as a piece of advice, try to avoid large-scale deletions like the ones your made without at least some sort of discussion (or at least make one change per edit with a clear edit summary to make it obvious why you removed each item, and to allow individual reverts instead of bulk ones). They almost always end up getting reverted, even on articles less controversial than this one. Thanks. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 03:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
20122 +++$+++ DigitalC +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20120 +++$+++ 20121 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.258942980E09 +++$+++ By reverting my edit, you added links to the article which had clearly been challenged. Per [[WP:EL]], the onus is on you to justify the inclusion of such links. If you felt some of the links were not contrary to [[WP:ELNO]], then you should have justified their inclusion, not revert the change wholesale. At the point of the edit, there were no \"other editors actively engaged in a dialog on the article's talk page\" about the links, so I'm not sure who you are talking for. However, again, per WP:EL the onus is on the people adding\/restoring links to justify their inclusion, not the person removing the link.  +++$+++ ::By reverting my edit, you added links to the article which had clearly been challenged. Per [[WP:EL]], the onus is on you to justify the inclusion of such links. If you felt some of the links were not contrary to [[WP:ELNO]], then you should have justified their inclusion, not revert the change wholesale. At the point of the edit, there were no "other editors actively engaged in a dialog on the article's talk page" about the links, so I'm not sure who you are talking for. However, again, per WP:EL the onus is on the people adding/restoring links to justify their inclusion, not the person removing the link. [[User:DigitalC|DigitalC]] ([[User talk:DigitalC|talk]]) 18:23, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
20123 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20120 +++$+++ 20122 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.258944660E09 +++$+++ In short, you took an axe to an article, and then you expected other editors to use a scalpel to correctly parse your good edits from your bad ones. I'm sorry, but that doesn't hold water at all. Now I suggest we stop wasting time in this pointless discussion on my talk page, and instead concentrate on the actual topic of this discussion, namely the article in question and its links. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :::In short, you took an axe to an article, and then you expected other editors to use a scalpel to correctly parse your good edits from your bad ones. I'm sorry, but that doesn't hold water at all. Now I suggest we stop wasting time in this pointless discussion on my talk page, and instead concentrate on the actual topic of this discussion, namely the article in question and its links. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 18:51, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
20124 +++$+++ DigitalC +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20120 +++$+++ 20123 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.258945320E09 +++$+++ Sure, I welcome discussion on the articles talk page. Hopefully you remember to [[AGF|assume good faith]], as you mentioned above. Stating that I was editing with an agenda and deleting things that didn't mesh with that agenda is not assuming good faith. I fully disagree with you that it is not up to you to justify your reversion, when the guideline says that it is up to you, and I fully disagree that it comes even close to gaming the system. Either way, I look forward to your response on the talk page, so that we can move forward.  +++$+++ ::::Sure, I welcome discussion on the articles talk page. Hopefully you remember to [[AGF|assume good faith]], as you mentioned above. Stating that I was editing with an agenda and deleting things that didn't mesh with that agenda is not assuming good faith. I fully disagree with you that it is not up to you to justify your reversion, when the guideline says that it is up to you, and I fully disagree that it comes even close to gaming the system. Either way, I look forward to your response on the talk page, so that we can move forward. [[User:DigitalC|DigitalC]] ([[User talk:DigitalC|talk]]) 19:02, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
20125 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20120 +++$+++ 20123 +++$+++ 2009-11-22 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.258948320E09 +++$+++ \"Assume good faith\" does not mean the same thing as \"ignore the obvious.\" You accused me of violating [[WP:EL]], and I explained why my edit did no such thing. Full stop. I'll consider this discussion on my talk page closed. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ ::::"Assume good faith" does not mean the same thing as "ignore the obvious." You accused me of violating [[WP:EL]], and I explained why my edit did no such thing. Full stop. I'll consider this discussion on my talk page closed. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 19:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

544412 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544412 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.189730340E09 +++$+++ I was planning to nominate the [[Anabolic steroid]] article for Featured article once again. It's gone a long way even since it's last FA nomination and is very stable and looks great. I thought I'd get your opinion prior to nominating it again just to ensure that it succeeds. What do you think? Would you support it?  +++$+++ I was planning to nominate the [[Anabolic steroid]] article for Featured article once again. It's gone a long way even since it's last FA nomination and is very stable and looks great. I thought I'd get your opinion prior to nominating it again just to ensure that it succeeds. What do you think? Would you support it? [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 17:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
544413 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544412 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.190100120E09 +++$+++ Yes, No?  +++$+++ ::Yes, No? [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 00:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

20126 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-19 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.261213560E09 +++$+++ '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a [[WP:BOT|bot]]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- +++$+++ '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a [[WP:BOT|bot]]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 01:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
20127 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20126 +++$+++ 20126 +++$+++ 2009-12-22 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.261523880E09 +++$+++ I agree completely. I AFDed this article a while back, but it appeared again. I didn't want to seem like I was crusading against it, so I edited it, and left it to see if someone else would AFD. I will weigh in at the AFD discussion when I get a chance. Thanks. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :I agree completely. I AFDed this article a while back, but it appeared again. I didn't want to seem like I was crusading against it, so I edited it, and left it to see if someone else would AFD. I will weigh in at the AFD discussion when I get a chance. Thanks. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 15:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

282271 +++$+++ Gaudio +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-08 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.194547020E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Gaudio|Gaudio]] 10:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
282272 +++$+++ Gaudio +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282271 +++$+++ 282271 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.194641160E09 +++$+++ Ciao.  +++$+++ :Ciao. [[User:Gaudio|Gaudio]] 12:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

544416 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544416 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-19 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.190269260E09 +++$+++ TimV, Tony, and Colin, {{user|Eubulides}} has completed his rewrite of [[Asperger syndrome]]; it's ready for a fresh look by any new eyes who want to review it.  He was working under pressure and on limited time, so he invites an additional prose check.   +++$+++ TimV, Tony, and Colin, {{user|Eubulides}} has completed his rewrite of [[Asperger syndrome]]; it's ready for a fresh look by any new eyes who want to review it.  He was working under pressure and on limited time, so he invites an additional prose check.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
544417 +++$+++ Fosnez +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544416 +++$+++ 544416 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.190368140E09 +++$+++ Greetings, thankyou for checking up on the AfD closure, its always good to ask :-) I closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Stanley Dunin 2|the AfD]] for a couple of reasons. The nomination said that the person the article speaks about was not notable. [[WP:GOOGLEHITS|Google searches]] should be avoided in notability discussions, especially when this person's notable events took place before Google was around, or the internet was even invented. According to the definition in [[WP:N]] notabillity is \"''Significant coverage by multiple Reliable Secondary Sources Independent of the subject.''\" Notabliity has been established by citation of ''The New York Times'', ''Detroit Times'' and ''Letter from Senator Homer Ferguson of Michigan to Secretary of State''. While I agree the article needs a massive cleanup and many more citations, deletion is not the answer. Perhaps you could place some <nowiki>{{fact}}<\/nowiki> tags where you believe citations are needed?  +++$+++ :Greetings, thankyou for checking up on the AfD closure, its always good to ask :-) I closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Dunin 2|the AfD]] for a couple of reasons. The nomination said that the person the article speaks about was not notable. [[WP:GOOGLEHITS|Google searches]] should be avoided in notability discussions, especially when this person's notable events took place before Google was around, or the internet was even invented. According to the definition in [[WP:N]] notabillity is "''Significant coverage by multiple Reliable Secondary Sources Independent of the subject.''" Notabliity has been established by citation of ''The New York Times'', ''Detroit Times'' and ''Letter from Senator Homer Ferguson of Michigan to Secretary of State''. While I agree the article needs a massive cleanup and many more citations, deletion is not the answer. Perhaps you could place some <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags where you believe citations are needed? [[User:Fosnez|Fosnez]] 02:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
544418 +++$+++ Fosnez +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544416 +++$+++ 544417 +++$+++ 2007-09-21 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.190368500E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I didn't realise you were an admin, the statement about adding tags was not ment to be patronizing.  +++$+++ ::Sorry, I didn't realise you were an admin, the statement about adding tags was not ment to be patronizing. [[User:Fosnez|Fosnez]] 02:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

20129 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20129 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-21 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.269158760E09 +++$+++ '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a [[WP:BOT|bot]]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- +++$+++ '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a [[WP:BOT|bot]]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 01:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
20130 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20129 +++$+++ 20129 +++$+++ 2010-07-11 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.278832080E09 +++$+++ You are absolutely correct. Thank you for pointing this out. I see it clearly now that you did so. I just don't know what to do about it yet. I will keep looking for a replacement map. They aren't easy to come by! <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :You are absolutely correct. Thank you for pointing this out. I see it clearly now that you did so. I just don't know what to do about it yet. I will keep looking for a replacement map. They aren't easy to come by! <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 00:08, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
20131 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20129 +++$+++ 20130 +++$+++ 2010-07-17 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.279355700E09 +++$+++ Changed description to topo map. It would be nice to have a scale.  +++$+++ ::Changed description to topo map. It would be nice to have a scale. [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] ([[User talk:Vsmith|talk]]) 01:35, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
20132 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20129 +++$+++ 20131 +++$+++ 2010-07-17 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.279355940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for catching that. I am planning to take the scale off of the larger map - I just haven't had a chance to do it yet. The large map itself is too big, I think, for this purpose (though I did load it, and it is available on the Commons page for Harshaw). <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :::Thanks for catching that. I am planning to take the scale off of the larger map - I just haven't had a chance to do it yet. The large map itself is too big, I think, for this purpose (though I did load it, and it is available on the Commons page for Harshaw). <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 01:39, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
20133 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20129 +++$+++ 20132 +++$+++ 2010-07-17 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.279357320E09 +++$+++ Done. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ ::::Done. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 02:02, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

282275 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-10 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.194765900E09 +++$+++ So, I think your map should show Tibet only as a nominal vassal for the period from 641 to 661, or, perhaps, to 669, at the latest. I believe it should also make it clear that Tibet was totally independent for the rest of the period 616-710. I hope I haven't made things too difficult for you. Best wishes,  +++$+++ So, I think your map should show Tibet only as a nominal vassal for the period from 641 to 661, or, perhaps, to 669, at the latest. I believe it should also make it clear that Tibet was totally independent for the rest of the period 616-710. I hope I haven't made things too difficult for you. Best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] 23:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
282276 +++$+++ Yug +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282275 +++$+++ 282275 +++$+++ 2007-11-11 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.194801120E09 +++$+++ Today I wrote this answer, and I will try to find a solution later.  +++$+++ :Today I wrote this answer, and I will try to find a solution later. [[User:Yug|Yug]] [[User talk:Yug|<small><font style="color:green;">(talk)</font></small>]] 09:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
282277 +++$+++ Yug +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282275 +++$+++ 282276 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.194893400E09 +++$+++ So I currently plan to change a bit the colors and to continue to encourage a fair use of the map (stating clearly the full legend). No more is need.  +++$+++ ::So I currently plan to change a bit the colors and to continue to encourage a fair use of the map (stating clearly the full legend). No more is need. [[User:Yug|Yug]] [[User talk:Yug|<small><font style="color:green;">(talk)</font></small>]] 10:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
282278 +++$+++ Yug +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282275 +++$+++ 282277 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.194894060E09 +++$+++ If your son may make a 10-15 lines summary about thibetan calligraphy : that's would be wonderful :]  +++$+++ :::If your son may make a 10-15 lines summary about thibetan calligraphy : that's would be wonderful :] [[User:Yug|Yug]] [[User talk:Yug|<small><font style="color:green;">(talk)</font></small>]] 11:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

178118 +++$+++ Smalljim +++$+++ Michael Glass +++$+++ 178118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-09 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.247157960E09 +++$+++ In [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Exmoor&diff=291604790&oldid=280591298 this edit] you added a really wrong link! I've reverted - do you want to have another go at it? Best, &nbsp;\u2014 +++$+++ In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Exmoor&diff=291604790&oldid=280591298 this edit] you added a really wrong link! I've reverted - do you want to have another go at it? Best, &nbsp;—[[User:Smalljim|S<small>MALL</small>]][[User talk:Smalljim#top|<small>JIM</small>]]&nbsp; 09:46, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
178119 +++$+++ Smalljim +++$+++ Michael Glass +++$+++ 178118 +++$+++ 178118 +++$+++ 2009-07-11 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.247338500E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Choco chip cookie.jpg|left|thumb|100px|Eat and enjoy!]]Just to say thanks for getting carried away and working so long doing all that work to [[Exmoor]]. &nbsp;\u2014 +++$+++ :[[Image:Choco chip cookie.jpg|left|thumb|100px|Eat and enjoy!]]Just to say thanks for getting carried away and working so long doing all that work to [[Exmoor]]. &nbsp;—[[User:Smalljim|S<small>MALL</small>]][[User talk:Smalljim#top|<small>JIM</small>]]&nbsp; 11:55, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

20135 +++$+++ Vsmith +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20135 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-18 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.279490820E09 +++$+++ That ''jutting mountains'' bit kinda bothers me a little - seems an odd replacement for ''comparatively little soil cover'', but I guess it's in the ref as such. ''Jutting mountains'' gives me a mental image of tectonic or volcanic uplift. Anyway, I didn't remove the ''... soil cover'' bit when I chopped the other source as it seems quite apt and descriptive (I worked in the area back in the 70s on Red Mtn.) and non-controversial. The erosional features of Harshaw Creek drainage with headward erosion into the Patagonias and the west margin of the San Rafael dominate my mental image of the area (supported by the topo map), but hey that's original research :) Cheers,  +++$+++ That ''jutting mountains'' bit kinda bothers me a little - seems an odd replacement for ''comparatively little soil cover'', but I guess it's in the ref as such. ''Jutting mountains'' gives me a mental image of tectonic or volcanic uplift. Anyway, I didn't remove the ''... soil cover'' bit when I chopped the other source as it seems quite apt and descriptive (I worked in the area back in the 70s on Red Mtn.) and non-controversial. The erosional features of Harshaw Creek drainage with headward erosion into the Patagonias and the west margin of the San Rafael dominate my mental image of the area (supported by the topo map), but hey that's original research :) Cheers, [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] ([[User talk:Vsmith|talk]]) 15:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
20136 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20135 +++$+++ 20135 +++$+++ 2010-07-18 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.279493520E09 +++$+++ I'm with you. I liked the old language better than the \"jutting mountains\" bit, and I agree the old description (lush areas interspersed with areas of exposed rock with little soil cover) seemed pretty much spot on for the region. I'll keep poking around for a source that bears that out a little better though I doubt anyone would balk at leaving the old language unreferenced as it's pretty uncontroversial. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :I'm with you. I liked the old language better than the "jutting mountains" bit, and I agree the old description (lush areas interspersed with areas of exposed rock with little soil cover) seemed pretty much spot on for the region. I'll keep poking around for a source that bears that out a little better though I doubt anyone would balk at leaving the old language unreferenced as it's pretty uncontroversial. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 15:52, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

20137 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20137 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-18 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.276907520E09 +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice -->  +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 17:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
20138 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20137 +++$+++ 20137 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.277027280E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I will review the guidelines, and check the list for pending reviews. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :Thank you. I will review the guidelines, and check the list for pending reviews. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 02:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

20139 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20139 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-15 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.279256040E09 +++$+++ Any interest in dermatology?  If so, we are always looking for more help at the [[WP:DERM|Dermatology task force]], particularly with the ongoing [[WP:DERM:MA|Bolognia push]].  I can e-mail you the login information if you like?  There is still a lot of potential for many new articles and redirects. --- +++$+++ Any interest in dermatology?  If so, we are always looking for more help at the [[WP:DERM|Dermatology task force]], particularly with the ongoing [[WP:DERM:MA|Bolognia push]].  I can e-mail you the login information if you like?  There is still a lot of potential for many new articles and redirects. ---[[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 21:54, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
20140 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20139 +++$+++ 20139 +++$+++ 2010-07-24 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.279955760E09 +++$+++ I can see why you might ask, but the several dermatology-related articles I've edited have been things I've stumbled upon either due to vandalism, or other more general medical edits. Good luck, though. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :I can see why you might ask, but the several dermatology-related articles I've edited have been things I've stumbled upon either due to vandalism, or other more general medical edits. Good luck, though. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 00:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

282285 +++$+++ Mike Searson +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-30 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.196411100E09 +++$+++ The article you cited mentions [[iguania]] not [[iguana]]  two entirely different things.  The [[genus]] Iguana contains the [[Green iguana]] and the [[Lesser Antillean iguana]] neither of which ever mentioned by Fry as being studied for having venom glands (because neither of them do). thanks-- +++$+++ The article you cited mentions [[iguania]] not [[iguana]]  two entirely different things.  The [[genus]] Iguana contains the [[Green iguana]] and the [[Lesser Antillean iguana]] neither of which ever mentioned by Fry as being studied for having venom glands (because neither of them do). thanks--[[User:Mike Searson|Mike Searson]] ([[User talk:Mike Searson|talk]]) 00:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
282286 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282285 +++$+++ 282285 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.196424720E09 +++$+++ Dear Mike: Thanks so much for pointing out my careless mistake - I have added a note on your talk page and corrected (I think) all the entries in which I made this error. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Dear Mike: Thanks so much for pointing out my careless mistake - I have added a note on your talk page and corrected (I think) all the entries in which I made this error. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill|talk]]) 04:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

20142 +++$+++ The Utahraptor +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-22 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.279833480E09 +++$+++ I noticed you provided a census table for the article [[Silver Reef, Utah|Silver Reef]]. I would first like to thank you. I'll put the table in as soon as I have some time. However, due to the fact that Silver Reef still has people in it, and some of the most popular ghost towns do have people in them, I have changed my mind about the demographics section and would like to make one. Is there a 2000 Census number for Silver Reef, and can you find anything about Silver Reef's demographics? Thanks!  +++$+++ I noticed you provided a census table for the article [[Silver Reef, Utah|Silver Reef]]. I would first like to thank you. I'll put the table in as soon as I have some time. However, due to the fact that Silver Reef still has people in it, and some of the most popular ghost towns do have people in them, I have changed my mind about the demographics section and would like to make one. Is there a 2000 Census number for Silver Reef, and can you find anything about Silver Reef's demographics? Thanks! [[User:The Utahraptor|<font color="green">The Raptor</font>]] [[User talk:The Utahraptor|<sup>Let's talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/The Utahraptor|<sub>My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions</sub>]] 14:18, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
20143 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20142 +++$+++ 20142 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.279833660E09 +++$+++ No problem. I picked up a used copy of the Moffat book a while back for about $6, and it's helped to fill in a lot of population data for these old ghost towns. Unfortunately, the book only shows numbers up until 1990. When I checked the Census web site, I couldn't find any numbers for 2000 (or later, as that site sometimes also shows estimates from in between more recent surveys). I think a demographics section is a great idea - I just don't know where to tell you to look for the recent data. I will do some more poking, and let you know if I find anything. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :No problem. I picked up a used copy of the Moffat book a while back for about $6, and it's helped to fill in a lot of population data for these old ghost towns. Unfortunately, the book only shows numbers up until 1990. When I checked the Census web site, I couldn't find any numbers for 2000 (or later, as that site sometimes also shows estimates from in between more recent surveys). I think a demographics section is a great idea - I just don't know where to tell you to look for the recent data. I will do some more poking, and let you know if I find anything. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 14:21, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
20144 +++$+++ The Utahraptor +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20142 +++$+++ 20143 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.279833960E09 +++$+++ Alright, thanks! I'm not sure if Silver Reef's population would be included in [[Leeds, Utah|Leeds]]' population, since they're only about half a mile away from each other. Then again there were 1990 Census numbers....I'll do some poking around, too.  +++$+++ ::Alright, thanks! I'm not sure if Silver Reef's population would be included in [[Leeds, Utah|Leeds]]' population, since they're only about half a mile away from each other. Then again there were 1990 Census numbers....I'll do some poking around, too. [[User:The Utahraptor|<font color="green">The Raptor</font>]] [[User talk:The Utahraptor|<sup>Let's talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/The Utahraptor|<sub>My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions</sub>]] 14:26, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
20145 +++$+++ The Utahraptor +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20142 +++$+++ 20144 +++$+++ 2010-07-29 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.280467380E09 +++$+++ I don't mean to be pushy, but have you found anything yet?  +++$+++ :::I don't mean to be pushy, but have you found anything yet? [[User:The Utahraptor|<font color="green">The Raptor</font>]] [[User talk:The Utahraptor|<sup>Let's talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/The Utahraptor|<sub>My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions</sub>]] 22:23, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
20146 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20142 +++$+++ 20145 +++$+++ 2010-07-30 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.280476200E09 +++$+++ Not a thing. I can't even find confirmation that Silver Reef is counted as part of Leeds (or that it isn't). Not sure where else to look at this point. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ ::::Not a thing. I can't even find confirmation that Silver Reef is counted as part of Leeds (or that it isn't). Not sure where else to look at this point. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 00:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
20147 +++$+++ The Utahraptor +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20142 +++$+++ 20146 +++$+++ 2010-07-30 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.280521680E09 +++$+++ Hm....could we still add a demographics section using only the 1990 census details?  +++$+++ :::::Hm....could we still add a demographics section using only the 1990 census details? [[User:The Utahraptor|<font color="green">The Raptor</font>]] [[User talk:The Utahraptor|<sup>You rang?</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/The Utahraptor|<sub>My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions</sub>]] 13:28, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
20148 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20142 +++$+++ 20147 +++$+++ 2010-07-30 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.280524260E09 +++$+++ For Silver Reef, that would include a demographics section that includes the historical census data, the more recent 1990 census data, and a discussion of some of the speculated population numbers that are often found in books and other less quantitative accounts. It would be great to know where those residents are counted today, and that's still something that can be researched, but for now, I'd go with what you have. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ ::::::For Silver Reef, that would include a demographics section that includes the historical census data, the more recent 1990 census data, and a discussion of some of the speculated population numbers that are often found in books and other less quantitative accounts. It would be great to know where those residents are counted today, and that's still something that can be researched, but for now, I'd go with what you have. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 14:11, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
20149 +++$+++ The Utahraptor +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20142 +++$+++ 20148 +++$+++ 2010-07-30 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.280524620E09 +++$+++ I like that. I'll try to work with that when I get some time (I'll be fairly busy most of today). I have one concern, though. The difference between Silver Reef and the ghost towns you mentioned is that Silver Reef still has a few current residents. Therefore, demographics should look like any unincorporated community; with average income, average number of people per household, etc. Can you dig any of that up, or will we have to stick with the simple sentence \"As of the 1990 census, Silver Reef housed approximately 50 people\"?  +++$+++ :::::::I like that. I'll try to work with that when I get some time (I'll be fairly busy most of today). I have one concern, though. The difference between Silver Reef and the ghost towns you mentioned is that Silver Reef still has a few current residents. Therefore, demographics should look like any unincorporated community; with average income, average number of people per household, etc. Can you dig any of that up, or will we have to stick with the simple sentence "As of the 1990 census, Silver Reef housed approximately 50 people"? [[User:The Utahraptor|<font color="green">The Raptor</font>]] [[User talk:The Utahraptor|<sup>You rang?</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/The Utahraptor|<sub>My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions</sub>]] 14:17, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

544432 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544432 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-26 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.190843580E09 +++$+++ Hey Tim, I thought you'd like to know I've semi-protected [[Enzyme]] for three days\u2014it seems it's getting quite a beating. I noticed the article had never been protected, and thought maybe there was a reason for that? Anyway, if you think it should be open for anon editing I'll unprotect it. Best,  +++$+++ Hey Tim, I thought you'd like to know I've semi-protected [[Enzyme]] for three days—it seems it's getting quite a beating. I noticed the article had never been protected, and thought maybe there was a reason for that? Anyway, if you think it should be open for anon editing I'll unprotect it. Best, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 14:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
544433 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544432 +++$+++ 544432 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.190843640E09 +++$+++ P.S. [[Oxidative phosphorylation|I'm getting there]] :) I'll upload the last two soon.  +++$+++ :P.S. [[Oxidative phosphorylation|I'm getting there]] :) I'll upload the last two soon. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 14:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

506955 +++$+++ IrishLass0128 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506955 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-25 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.190770260E09 +++$+++ Links add to the cohesion by conveniently accessing other article.  Therefore, linking to non-existant pages detracts from cohesion and convenience. +++$+++ Links add to the cohesion by conveniently accessing other article.  Therefore, linking to non-existant pages detracts from cohesion and convenience.[[User:IrishLass0128|IrishLass0128]] 18:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
506956 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506955 +++$+++ 506955 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.190770500E09 +++$+++ In what way? The function of redlinks is to indicate that an article needs to be created. Please don't claim that redlinks are forbidden by [[WP:MOS]], when they clearly are not. -- +++$+++ :In what way? The function of redlinks is to indicate that an article needs to be created. Please don't claim that redlinks are forbidden by [[WP:MOS]], when they clearly are not. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] 18:35, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
506957 +++$+++ IrishLass0128 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506955 +++$+++ 506956 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.190770920E09 +++$+++ Show me where it says they are.  No worries though, I've reported your for false accusations of vandalism and not showing good faith in editing.  The MOS states linking is for existing internal articles.  Redlinking is discouraged.  I notice you claim to own the Steelers page.  I'll let an admin handle that as well. +++$+++ ::Show me where it says they are.  No worries though, I've reported your for false accusations of vandalism and not showing good faith in editing.  The MOS states linking is for existing internal articles.  Redlinking is discouraged.  I notice you claim to own the Steelers page.  I'll let an admin handle that as well.[[User:IrishLass0128|IrishLass0128]] 18:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
506958 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506955 +++$+++ 506957 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.190771160E09 +++$+++ Do you have any diffs where I accused you of vandalism? Or where I claimed to own the Steelers article? -- +++$+++ :::Do you have any diffs where I accused you of vandalism? Or where I claimed to own the Steelers article? --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] 18:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
506959 +++$+++ IrishLass0128 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506955 +++$+++ 506958 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.190771760E09 +++$+++ That twinkie thing you referred me to, as I read it, is an accusation of vandalism.  On your own page you claim to own the Steelers page and your edits indicate you seem to believe you do.  I'll let an admin deal with this from now on.  That's their job, not mine. +++$+++ ::::That twinkie thing you referred me to, as I read it, is an accusation of vandalism.  On your own page you claim to own the Steelers page and your edits indicate you seem to believe you do.  I'll let an admin deal with this from now on.  That's their job, not mine.[[User:IrishLass0128|IrishLass0128]] 18:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
506960 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506955 +++$+++ 506959 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.190773680E09 +++$+++ Twinkle is just a tool, not an accusation of vandalism. You seem to be getting awfully worked up over something so trivial. -- +++$+++ :::::Twinkle is just a tool, not an accusation of vandalism. You seem to be getting awfully worked up over something so trivial. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] 19:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
506961 +++$+++ IrishLass0128 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506955 +++$+++ 506957 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.190777040E09 +++$+++ Accusations of vandalism are not trivial.  Anything that can get a user blocked is not trivial and since none of my edits were vandalism, your accusations show lack of good faith.  And, Wilhelmina Will, your accusations do not show good faith either.   +++$+++ ::*Accusations of vandalism are not trivial.  Anything that can get a user blocked is not trivial and since none of my edits were vandalism, your accusations show lack of good faith.  And, Wilhelmina Will, your accusations do not show good faith either.  [[User:IrishLass0128|IrishLass0128]] 20:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
506962 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506955 +++$+++ 506957 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.190776680E09 +++$+++ Again, not once did I utter the word \"vandalism\" to you. Not in an edit summary, not on a talk page. -- +++$+++ :::Again, not once did I utter the word "vandalism" to you. Not in an edit summary, not on a talk page. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] 20:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
506963 +++$+++ IrishLass0128 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 506955 +++$+++ 506962 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.190777040E09 +++$+++ The first paragraph in the TW article that your edit summary referred me to states \"acts of vandalism\" if that's not an accusation then you shouldn't use it in your edit summary. '''Twinkle is a set of JavaScripts that gives registered users several new options to assist them in common Wikipedia maintenance tasks and to help them deal with acts of vandalism'''.  If you don't intend to accuse people, I wouldn't include the TW link in your edit summaries. +++$+++ ::::The first paragraph in the TW article that your edit summary referred me to states "acts of vandalism" if that's not an accusation then you shouldn't use it in your edit summary. '''Twinkle is a set of JavaScripts that gives registered users several new options to assist them in common Wikipedia maintenance tasks and to help them deal with acts of vandalism'''.  If you don't intend to accuse people, I wouldn't include the TW link in your edit summaries.[[User:IrishLass0128|IrishLass0128]] 20:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

282291 +++$+++ Mike Searson +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282291 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-30 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.196430240E09 +++$+++ I cleaned up a few places where you added the source to Fry.  To clarify...[[Mexican Beaded Lizard]]s and [[Gila Monster]]s have always been known to be venomous.  While I agree with the essence of what Fry says, I do not agree with the way he presents his findings (its also not that new of a revelation).-- +++$+++ I cleaned up a few places where you added the source to Fry.  To clarify...[[Mexican Beaded Lizard]]s and [[Gila Monster]]s have always been known to be venomous.  While I agree with the essence of what Fry says, I do not agree with the way he presents his findings (its also not that new of a revelation).--[[User:Mike Searson|Mike Searson]] ([[User talk:Mike Searson|talk]]) 05:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
282292 +++$+++ Mike Searson +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282291 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 06:17:00 +++$+++ 1.196432220E09 +++$+++ Alot of what he's saying was said by Trooper Walsh at the National Zoo in Washington DC, 20+ years ago, concerning monitors.  In simple terms...venom is saliva.  Saliva is a pre-digestant.  It's purpose is to break down food.  Ross Allen did some studies on venom breaking down food \"from the inside of the prey\" to help the snake digest it.  People have suffered non-bacterial tissue damage from bites by humans, cats, horses, dogs, etc...why would a non-venomous reptile be any different?  Read back that quote you included in the Bearded dragon article and parse it out, you'll see what I mean.  I'm just glad my tax dollars aren't going toward his grant money.-- +++$+++ ::Alot of what he's saying was said by Trooper Walsh at the National Zoo in Washington DC, 20+ years ago, concerning monitors.  In simple terms...venom is saliva.  Saliva is a pre-digestant.  It's purpose is to break down food.  Ross Allen did some studies on venom breaking down food "from the inside of the prey" to help the snake digest it.  People have suffered non-bacterial tissue damage from bites by humans, cats, horses, dogs, etc...why would a non-venomous reptile be any different?  Read back that quote you included in the Bearded dragon article and parse it out, you'll see what I mean.  I'm just glad my tax dollars aren't going toward his grant money.--[[User:Mike Searson|Mike Searson]] ([[User talk:Mike Searson|talk]]) 06:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

20150 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-30 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.280538540E09 +++$+++ (undent) I think for now, stick with the sentence you mentioned, and in the mean time, we keep looking for the more recent information. If we can just source the fact that as of 2000 the numbers are now grouped with Leeds (for example), then we can mention that and link to the Leeds demographics section for further information. There must be a way to find that out. I'll keep looking. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ (undent) I think for now, stick with the sentence you mentioned, and in the mean time, we keep looking for the more recent information. If we can just source the fact that as of 2000 the numbers are now grouped with Leeds (for example), then we can mention that and link to the Leeds demographics section for further information. There must be a way to find that out. I'll keep looking. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 18:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
20151 +++$+++ The Utahraptor +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20150 +++$+++ 20150 +++$+++ 2010-07-30 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.280544420E09 +++$+++ Alright. I'll do as you said, and start the demographics section. I'll also keep a lookout for both 2000 Census data for Silver Reef and a source that says Silver Reef's population is included in Leeds. One last question, though. Should we change the label of Silver Reef from ghost town to unincorporated community? A couple ghost towns ([[Virginia City, Nevada|example 1]] and [[Virginia City, Montana|example 2]]) are labeled as such, so I think it would be a good idea. What do you think?  +++$+++ :Alright. I'll do as you said, and start the demographics section. I'll also keep a lookout for both 2000 Census data for Silver Reef and a source that says Silver Reef's population is included in Leeds. One last question, though. Should we change the label of Silver Reef from ghost town to unincorporated community? A couple ghost towns ([[Virginia City, Nevada|example 1]] and [[Virginia City, Montana|example 2]]) are labeled as such, so I think it would be a good idea. What do you think? [[User:The Utahraptor|<font color="green">The Raptor</font>]] [[User talk:The Utahraptor|<sup>You rang?</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/The Utahraptor|<sub>My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions</sub>]] 19:47, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
20152 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20150 +++$+++ 20151 +++$+++ 2010-07-31 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.280565120E09 +++$+++ I don't think you can go wrong either way at this point. I think Silver Reef itself is gone. Having a few residents doesn't make it \"not a ghost town,\" in my opinion (and according to the working definitions I've seen and used on Wikipedia). I also think it qualifies as an Unincorporated Community as well, and that there's some overlap between the two. I'm not sure. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ ::I don't think you can go wrong either way at this point. I think Silver Reef itself is gone. Having a few residents doesn't make it "not a ghost town," in my opinion (and according to the working definitions I've seen and used on Wikipedia). I also think it qualifies as an Unincorporated Community as well, and that there's some overlap between the two. I'm not sure. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 01:32, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

429600 +++$+++ Dihydrogen Monoxide +++$+++ SorryGuy +++$+++ 429600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-09 07:19:00 +++$+++ 1.202570340E09 +++$+++ You want? ;) '' +++$+++ You want? ;) ''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|dihydrogen monoxide]]'' <small>([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|H<sub>2</sub>0]])</small> 07:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
429601 +++$+++ SorryGuy +++$+++ SorryGuy +++$+++ 429600 +++$+++ 429600 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.202572140E09 +++$+++ With the AfD backlog as it is and with what I consider sufficient time passed since first RfA, I had been considering asking for a nomination from one of those who offered one last time in the next few weeks. If you are offering a nomination, though, I would be honored to accept it. Cheers, <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #FF3333;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :With the AfD backlog as it is and with what I consider sufficient time passed since first RfA, I had been considering asking for a nomination from one of those who offered one last time in the next few weeks. If you are offering a nomination, though, I would be honored to accept it. Cheers, <small><span style="border:1px solid #FF3333;padding:1px;">[[User:SorryGuy|<b>SorryGuy</b>]] [[User_talk:SorryGuy|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#FF3333;">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 07:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
429602 +++$+++ Dihydrogen Monoxide +++$+++ SorryGuy +++$+++ 429600 +++$+++ 429601 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.202572680E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/SorryGuy 2]]; Best of luck. Cheers, '' +++$+++ ::[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SorryGuy 2]]; Best of luck. Cheers, ''[[User:Dihydrogen Monoxide|dihydrogen monoxide]]'' <small>([[User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide|H<sub>2</sub>0]])</small> 07:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

544441 +++$+++ BirgitteSB +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544441 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-25 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.190751360E09 +++$+++ This is a microbiology article that is unreferenced since June 2006.  Since you have helped me out with similar articles before I thought I would ask another favor for this one.  I am trying to clean out the non-biography articles left in that category, so I may find some more articles like this one soon.--<i><font color=\"#9966FF\"> +++$+++ This is a microbiology article that is unreferenced since June 2006.  Since you have helped me out with similar articles before I thought I would ask another favor for this one.  I am trying to clean out the non-biography articles left in that category, so I may find some more articles like this one soon.--<i><font color="#9966FF">[[User:BirgitteSB|Birgitte]]</font><font color="#CC99CC" size="2">SB</font></i> 13:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
544442 +++$+++ BirgitteSB +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544441 +++$+++ 544441 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.190758440E09 +++$+++ [[G1\/S transition]] Another one--<i><font color=\"#9966FF\"> +++$+++ *[[G1/S transition]] Another one--<i><font color="#9966FF">[[User:BirgitteSB|Birgitte]]</font><font color="#CC99CC" size="2">SB</font></i> 15:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

20154 +++$+++ JuneGloom07 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-31 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.312097940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for helping out with [[One Direction]]. I can barely keep up with the amount of edits coming through, let alone warn the editors too. I'm pretty sure some information and references have got lost in all the reverting, so someone will have to find the last clean version at some point. I requested the article be protected at [[WP:RfPP]], but it appears all the admins are otherwise occupied. -  +++$+++ Thanks for helping out with [[One Direction]]. I can barely keep up with the amount of edits coming through, let alone warn the editors too. I'm pretty sure some information and references have got lost in all the reverting, so someone will have to find the last clean version at some point. I requested the article be protected at [[WP:RfPP]], but it appears all the admins are otherwise occupied. - [[User:JuneGloom07|<font color="Purple" face="Arial">'''JuneGloom'''</font>]]  [[User_Talk:JuneGloom07|<font color="Green" face="Times New Roman">Talk</font>]] 00:39, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
20155 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20154 +++$+++ 20154 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.312098120E09 +++$+++ No worries. Can't wait for that protection to come through!! <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :No worries. Can't wait for that protection to come through!! <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 00:42, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
20156 +++$+++ JuneGloom07 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20154 +++$+++ 20155 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.312098540E09 +++$+++ I just made a plea for help to the first admin I spotted online and the article has finally been protected. Thank you again! -  +++$+++ ::I just made a plea for help to the first admin I spotted online and the article has finally been protected. Thank you again! - [[User:JuneGloom07|<font color="Purple" face="Arial">'''JuneGloom'''</font>]]  [[User_Talk:JuneGloom07|<font color="Green" face="Times New Roman">Talk</font>]] 00:49, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
20157 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20154 +++$+++ 20156 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.312098600E09 +++$+++ Sorry you were stuck there alone for so long. I think I need a nap! <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :::Sorry you were stuck there alone for so long. I think I need a nap! <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 00:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
20158 +++$+++ JuneGloom07 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20154 +++$+++ 20157 +++$+++ 2011-07-31 00:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312098960E09 +++$+++ No problem. I know what you mean about the nap, think I'll go now before I stumble upon another situation like that. -  +++$+++ ::::No problem. I know what you mean about the nap, think I'll go now before I stumble upon another situation like that. - [[User:JuneGloom07|<font color="Purple" face="Arial">'''JuneGloom'''</font>]]  [[User_Talk:JuneGloom07|<font color="Green" face="Times New Roman">Talk</font>]] 00:56, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
20159 +++$+++ Falcon8765 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20154 +++$+++ 20154 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 02:30:00 +++$+++ 1.312363800E09 +++$+++ Have you made any effort at all to read the policies and guidelines linked to you? ''' +++$+++ :Have you made any effort at all to read the policies and guidelines linked to you? '''[[User:Falcon8765|<span style='font-family: "Trebuchet MS"; color:#556B2F'>Falcon8765</span>]]''' <sup><small>[[User talk:Falcon8765|<font color="	#00008B">(T<small>ALK</small>)</font>]]</small></sup> 02:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

544445 +++$+++ Iridescent +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-28 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.191035400E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ASimon_Wessely&diff=160975847&oldid=160974724 This] rather bitey comment wasn't aimed at you in particular, but just to preempt that section turning into yet another free-for-all discussion of the content of the papers regardless to their relevance to the article. (The papers aren't either by or about him.)<font face=\"Trebuchet MS\"> \u2014   +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASimon_Wessely&diff=160975847&oldid=160974724 This] rather bitey comment wasn't aimed at you in particular, but just to preempt that section turning into yet another free-for-all discussion of the content of the papers regardless to their relevance to the article. (The papers aren't either by or about him.)<font face="Trebuchet MS"> —  [[User:Iridescent|<font color="#E45E05">iride</font><font color="#C1118C">scent</font>]] [[User_talk:Iridescent|<small><font color="#5CA36A"><i>(talk to me!)</i></font></small>]]</font> 20:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
544446 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544445 +++$+++ 544445 +++$+++ 2007-09-29 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.191120540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the barnstar. \"Wolf-pit\" is a fair description of the discussion.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the barnstar. "Wolf-pit" is a fair description of the discussion. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 19:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

20160 +++$+++ MyOwnEmailShowWiki +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20160 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-03 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.312364340E09 +++$+++ im not a dad guy i am just a guy trying to get some popularity on YouTube +++$+++ im not a dad guy i am just a guy trying to get some popularity on YouTube[[User:MyOwnEmailShowWiki|MyOwnEmailShowWiki]] ([[User talk:MyOwnEmailShowWiki|talk]]) 02:39, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
20161 +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ Transity +++$+++ 20160 +++$+++ 20160 +++$+++ 2011-08-03 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.312364100E09 +++$+++ You need to read the policies I (and others) linked to on your user page. The articles you are creating have no claim to [[WP:N|notability]], no [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], and as the creator, you have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. Please take the time to read those policies, and I think you will see why your articles keep being tagged for deletion. Thanks. <font color=\"80080\">--<\/font><font color=\"800080\" face=\"Verdana\">'''  +++$+++ :You need to read the policies I (and others) linked to on your user page. The articles you are creating have no claim to [[WP:N|notability]], no [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], and as the creator, you have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. Please take the time to read those policies, and I think you will see why your articles keep being tagged for deletion. Thanks. <font color="80080">--</font><font color="800080" face="Verdana">''' [[User:Transity|Transity]]'''</font><font color="800080"><sup><small>([[User talk:Transity|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Transity|contribs]])</small></sup></font> 02:35, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

544452 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-30 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.191212280E09 +++$+++ Do you have access to [http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/sites\/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8885813&dopt=Citation this source]? Can you E-mail it to me? Thanks.  +++$+++ Do you have access to [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8885813&dopt=Citation this source]? Can you E-mail it to me? Thanks. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 21:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
544453 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544452 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 12:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191268260E09 +++$+++ Have you checked? Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Have you checked? Thanks. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 12:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

282309 +++$+++ Neo-Jay +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282309 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-15 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.197788040E09 +++$+++ By the way, Wikipedia does not allow renaming a page by cut and paste (see [[Help:Moving a page]]). If we cannot move a page, placing a request at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] is the only thing we can do. I have supported your proposal at [[Talk:Ta-Hia]]. Thank you for your contributions.-- +++$+++ By the way, Wikipedia does not allow renaming a page by cut and paste (see [[Help:Moving a page]]). If we cannot move a page, placing a request at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] is the only thing we can do. I have supported your proposal at [[Talk:Ta-Hia]]. Thank you for your contributions.--[[User:Neo-Jay|Neo-Jay]] ([[User talk:Neo-Jay|talk]]) 22:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
282310 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282309 +++$+++ 282309 +++$+++ 2007-12-16 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.197792420E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your friendly support and help - I have just listed the article at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]]. Best wishes,  +++$+++ :Thanks again for your friendly support and help - I have just listed the article at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]]. Best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 00:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

20166 +++$+++ Mark Dingemanse +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20166 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-03 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.131068160E09 +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|right]]Hi, Robert. I'm terribly sorry for getting back to you this late. This is concerning your clarification over at [[User talk:Mark Dingemanse\/Roylee#rpyle731]]. I never meant to drag you into it; I merely noted that one of the edits made through an IP usually used by Roylee was to your userpage. I have now removed your userpage from the 'suspect edits' list, since I want to avoid conveying the impression that you have anything to do with this person. Please accept my apologies; you're obviously doing great work here. Enjoy the sunflower and keep it up! Kind regards, &mdash;  +++$+++ [[Image:WikiThanks.png|right]]Hi, Robert. I'm terribly sorry for getting back to you this late. This is concerning your clarification over at [[User talk:Mark Dingemanse/Roylee#rpyle731]]. I never meant to drag you into it; I merely noted that one of the edits made through an IP usually used by Roylee was to your userpage. I have now removed your userpage from the 'suspect edits' list, since I want to avoid conveying the impression that you have anything to do with this person. Please accept my apologies; you're obviously doing great work here. Enjoy the sunflower and keep it up! Kind regards, &mdash; [[User:Mark Dingemanse|mark]] [[User Talk:Mark Dingemanse|&#9998;]] 17:36, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
20167 +++$+++  +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20166 +++$+++ 20166 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks, Mark.  Not a problem. --{{user:rpyle731\/sig}} 07:50, 5 November 2005 (UTC) +++$+++ :Thanks, Mark.  Not a problem. --{{user:rpyle731/sig}} 07:50, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

544457 +++$+++ Profg +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-03 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.191460920E09 +++$+++ Thank you for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Orangemarlin&diff=162052958&oldid=161951857 this.] It is my sincere hope that this will calm down what appears to be a POV-warrior. Thanks again. -- +++$+++ Thank you for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Orangemarlin&diff=162052958&oldid=161951857 this.] It is my sincere hope that this will calm down what appears to be a POV-warrior. Thanks again. --[[User:Profg|profg]] 18:22, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
544458 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544457 +++$+++ 544457 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.191467760E09 +++$+++ Huh?   +++$+++ :Huh?  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 20:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

20170 +++$+++ Roger Davies +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20170 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 11:13:00 +++$+++ 1.199301180E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your help, -- +++$+++ Thanks again for your help, --[[User:Roger Davies|<font color="maroon">'''R<small>OGER</small>&nbsp;D<small>AVIES'''</small></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 11:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
20171 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20170 +++$+++ 20170 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.199366100E09 +++$+++ You're very welcome.  Just trying to be useful and gnomish.  +++$+++ :You're very welcome.  Just trying to be useful and gnomish. [[user:rpyle731|rpyle731]][[user talk:rpyle731|<sup>talk</sup>]] 05:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

352887 +++$+++  +++$+++ Cryptic +++$+++ 352887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-08 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.210250280E09 +++$+++ I see you were involved in some deletion discussion regarding [[TOMS Shoes]].  This article was deleted, then recreated by the business itself, then edited by someone who claims to be a newspaper writer, but it still reads like an ad and is generally unreferenced, unless you include press releases, dead links and references to the company's own websites.  I've put notices on the page and note that there is no talk page.  Post on  +++$+++ I see you were involved in some deletion discussion regarding [[TOMS Shoes]].  This article was deleted, then recreated by the business itself, then edited by someone who claims to be a newspaper writer, but it still reads like an ad and is generally unreferenced, unless you include press releases, dead links and references to the company's own websites.  I've put notices on the page and note that there is no talk page.  Post on [[User talk:Danorton|my talk page]] if you're interested in discussing this for cleanup or deletion.  (Sheesh, [[Rogan's Shoes]] looks similar!  What's with the shoes?) It looks like the only notability is that of the owner, who appeared on [[The Amazing Race]] reality TV show, then attempted to co-found a reality TV cable network.  Something smells spammish.  --Danorton 05:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
352888 +++$+++ Cryptic +++$+++ Cryptic +++$+++ 352887 +++$+++ 352887 +++$+++ 2008-05-11 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.210534860E09 +++$+++ By quoting it as their mission statement and attributing it to them, instead of just dropping it into the article unlabelled and letting it masquerade as the actual content. &mdash; +++$+++ :By quoting it as their mission statement and attributing it to them, instead of just dropping it into the article unlabelled and letting it masquerade as the actual content. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 12:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

544464 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544464 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-08 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191891060E09 +++$+++ Hey Tim. Would you like me to update it? I see you uploaded a new version of the PNG.  +++$+++ Hey Tim. Would you like me to update it? I see you uploaded a new version of the PNG. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 17:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
544465 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544464 +++$+++ 544464 +++$+++ 2007-10-08 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.191892080E09 +++$+++ {{tick|18}} '''Done''' :) Shame on me for not noticing. I fixed a doozy on [[:Image:Sterol synthesis.svg]] the other day\u2014seems we'd forgotten an all-important oxygen on the [[pyrophosphate]] groups.  +++$+++ :{{tick|18}} '''Done''' :) Shame on me for not noticing. I fixed a doozy on [[:Image:Sterol synthesis.svg]] the other day—seems we'd forgotten an all-important oxygen on the [[pyrophosphate]] groups. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 18:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

20178 +++$+++ Acebulf +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20178 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-29 02:20:00 +++$+++ 1.238318400E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I made a few articles and there was always this stub sorting thing. I will try to do it next time I make an article.  +++$+++ Thanks, I made a few articles and there was always this stub sorting thing. I will try to do it next time I make an article. [[User:Acebulf|Acebulf]] ([[User talk:Acebulf|talk]]) 02:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
20179 +++$+++ Acebulf +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20178 +++$+++ 20178 +++$+++ 2009-03-29 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.238381100E09 +++$+++ I tried to stub sort at my new [[Joshua Milne]] article. Is this good?  +++$+++ :I tried to stub sort at my new [[Joshua Milne]] article. Is this good? [[User:Acebulf|Acebulf]] ([[User talk:Acebulf|talk]]) 19:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

544468 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-09 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.191969840E09 +++$+++ Hi there, the article has been changed substantially since your vote so you might want to have another look at the new version. All the best  +++$+++ Hi there, the article has been changed substantially since your vote so you might want to have another look at the new version. All the best [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 15:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
544469 +++$+++ Lawrence Cohen +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544468 +++$+++ 544468 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.191969960E09 +++$+++ Let me take a look. \u2022 <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"><font color=\"#800080\"> +++$+++ :Let me take a look. • <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#800080">[[User talk:Lawrence Cohen|Lawrence Cohen]]</font></span> 15:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
544470 +++$+++ Lawrence Cohen +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544468 +++$+++ 544468 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.191970320E09 +++$+++ OK, I updated. Good catch. \u2022 <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"><font color=\"#800080\"> +++$+++ :OK, I updated. Good catch. • <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#800080">[[User talk:Lawrence Cohen|Lawrence Cohen]]</font></span> 15:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

20183 +++$+++ Emargie +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-19 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.258682820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your tag and assess work here.  +++$+++ Thanks for your tag and assess work here. [[User:Emargie|Emargie]] ([[User talk:Emargie|talk]]) 18:07, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
20184 +++$+++ Fetchcomms +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20183 +++$+++ 20183 +++$+++ 2009-11-21 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.258797120E09 +++$+++ I found the article's talk page, but I'm not sure where the article itself is. Please change the helpme tag back if you need more help.--<span style=\"border:1px solid;\"> +++$+++ :I found the article's talk page, but I'm not sure where the article itself is. Please change the helpme tag back if you need more help.--<span style="border:1px solid;">[[User:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">&nbsp;fetch</span>''']][[User talk:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">comms</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black;">☛</span>]]</span> 01:52, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
20185 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20183 +++$+++ 20184 +++$+++ 2009-11-21 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.258803420E09 +++$+++ Thanks, for the help, Fetchcomms.  I am following up with JPG-GR. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks, for the help, Fetchcomms.  I am following up with JPG-GR. --[[User:Rpyle731|Rpyle731]]<sup>[[User talk:Rpyle731|talk]]</sup> 03:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
20186 +++$+++ Fetchcomms +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20183 +++$+++ 20185 +++$+++ 2009-11-21 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.258802760E09 +++$+++ No problem. If you experience more issues, just ask.--<span style=\"border:1px solid;\"> +++$+++ :::No problem. If you experience more issues, just ask.--<span style="border:1px solid;">[[User:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">&nbsp;fetch</span>''']][[User talk:Fetchcomms|'''<span style="color:black;">comms</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black;">☛</span>]]</span> 03:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
20187 +++$+++ JPG-GR +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20183 +++$+++ 20183 +++$+++ 2009-11-21 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.258797300E09 +++$+++ I cleaned up the mainspace \"spaghetti\" before I even noticed this. Feel free to attempt your move again.  +++$+++ :I cleaned up the mainspace "spaghetti" before I even noticed this. Feel free to attempt your move again. [[User:JPG-GR|JPG-GR]] ([[User talk:JPG-GR|talk]]) 01:55, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
20188 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20183 +++$+++ 20187 +++$+++ 2009-11-21 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.258803420E09 +++$+++ Thanks, JPG-GR. --  +++$+++ ::Thanks, JPG-GR. -- [[User:Rpyle731|Rpyle731]]<sup>[[User talk:Rpyle731|talk]]</sup> 03:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

544472 +++$+++ Sadi Carnot +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544472 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-10 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.192070640E09 +++$+++ Tim can you please speedy these for me.  I am the sole author of these and I put speedy tags on them, as is my right per [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion]], as through my best efforts I cannot seem to prove that these are \"real\" subjects, but my tags were reverted by: [[User:Kkmurray]].  Thanks: -- +++$+++ Tim can you please speedy these for me.  I am the sole author of these and I put speedy tags on them, as is my right per [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion]], as through my best efforts I cannot seem to prove that these are "real" subjects, but my tags were reverted by: [[User:Kkmurray]].  Thanks: --[[User:Sadi Carnot|Sadi Carnot]] 19:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
544473 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544472 +++$+++ 544472 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.192070940E09 +++$+++ Hi there, I admire your magnanimous approach, well done for doing what is best for Wikipedia despite the personal annoyance this must cause. I've already raised this at [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Closing_of_Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FHuman_chemistry|the admin noiceboard]] but don't want to do this myself since I was part of the discussion. Do you want the material copied to a user sub-page before the history becomes unaccessible? All the best.  +++$+++ :Hi there, I admire your magnanimous approach, well done for doing what is best for Wikipedia despite the personal annoyance this must cause. I've already raised this at [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Closing_of_Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FHuman_chemistry|the admin noiceboard]] but don't want to do this myself since I was part of the discussion. Do you want the material copied to a user sub-page before the history becomes unaccessible? All the best. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 19:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
544474 +++$+++ Sadi Carnot +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544472 +++$+++ 544473 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.192071480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help.  You can speedy \"[[User:Sadi Carnot\/Draft1]]\", the subpage, as well.  Let me know if there's any other help I can assist you with.  Later: -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for your help.  You can speedy "[[User:Sadi Carnot/Draft1]]", the subpage, as well.  Let me know if there's any other help I can assist you with.  Later: --[[User:Sadi Carnot|Sadi Carnot]] 19:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
544475 +++$+++ Kkmurray +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544472 +++$+++ 544473 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.192072680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your work on this. I removed the improper speedy delete so that the AfD discussion could be carried through to its conclusion. That was a nice gesture on Sadi Carnot's part, but I think that it might have extended rather than truncated the discussion. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for your work on this. I removed the improper speedy delete so that the AfD discussion could be carried through to its conclusion. That was a nice gesture on Sadi Carnot's part, but I think that it might have extended rather than truncated the discussion. --[[User:Kkmurray|Kkmurray]] 20:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
544476 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544472 +++$+++ 544475 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.192074240E09 +++$+++ One problem with con-men is that once they are caught, they are very good at acting polite and friendly to avoid further consequences. I reiterate my strongly held opinion that [[User:Sadi Carnot|Sadi Carnot]] deserves an indefinite block for his attempt at fraud. +++$+++ :::One problem with con-men is that once they are caught, they are very good at acting polite and friendly to avoid further consequences. I reiterate my strongly held opinion that [[User:Sadi Carnot|Sadi Carnot]] deserves an indefinite block for his attempt at fraud.[[User:Kww|Kww]] 20:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
544477 +++$+++ Lycurgus +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544472 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.192082760E09 +++$+++ I meant [[human molecule]] which didn't seem like a hoax to me. The other one took milliseconds to dismiss.  +++$+++ ::::: I meant [[human molecule]] which didn't seem like a hoax to me. The other one took milliseconds to dismiss. [[User:Lycurgus|Lycurgus]] 23:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

282330 +++$+++ Bruceanthro +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-09 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.199915700E09 +++$+++ I thought I'd ask!  Cheers  +++$+++ I thought I'd ask!  Cheers [[User:Bruceanthro|Bruceanthro]] ([[User talk:Bruceanthro|talk]]) 13:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
282331 +++$+++ Bruceanthro +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282330 +++$+++ 282330 +++$+++ 2008-01-10 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.200006060E09 +++$+++ Great!! Please enjoy your Atherton tableland travels ... and I will take you up on your agreement\/offer to contribute by posting a reminder here, sometime in Feb.  All the best!  +++$+++ :Great!! Please enjoy your Atherton tableland travels ... and I will take you up on your agreement/offer to contribute by posting a reminder here, sometime in Feb.  All the best! [[User:Bruceanthro|Bruceanthro]] ([[User talk:Bruceanthro|talk]]) 15:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

20190 +++$+++ Zacharyjos +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20190 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-23 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.264315500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help. Could you check this article? I don't known english very well and sometimes do mistakes.  +++$+++ Thanks for your help. Could you check this article? I don't known english very well and sometimes do mistakes. [[User:Zacharyjos|Zacharyjos]] ([[User talk:Zacharyjos|talk]]) 22:45, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
20191 +++$+++ Zacharyjos +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20190 +++$+++ 20190 +++$+++ 2010-01-23 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.264316160E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot :)  +++$+++ : Thanks a lot :) [[User:Zacharyjos|Zacharyjos]] ([[User talk:Zacharyjos|talk]]) 22:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
20192 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20190 +++$+++ 20190 +++$+++ 2010-03-04 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.267763580E09 +++$+++ Done. I have [[WP:REDIRECT|redirected]] from [[Iain McNciol]] to the correct spelling. <small><span style=\"border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;\"> +++$+++ :Done. I have [[WP:REDIRECT|redirected]] from [[Iain McNciol]] to the correct spelling. <small><span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background-color:darkblue; color:#FFFFFF"> &nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B; background-color:yellow; border: 0px solid; ">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 20:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

544479 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544479 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-11 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.192144800E09 +++$+++ Do you use IRC, Tim?  +++$+++ Do you use IRC, Tim? [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 16:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
544480 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544479 +++$+++ 544479 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.192145460E09 +++$+++ No, I'm still holding off from that. I do sometimes use #wikipedia at home, but not at work.  +++$+++ :No, I'm still holding off from that. I do sometimes use #wikipedia at home, but not at work. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 16:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
544481 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544479 +++$+++ 544480 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.192145580E09 +++$+++ Ok, Because I thought it would be a fast way to communicate live.  +++$+++ ::Ok, Because I thought it would be a fast way to communicate live. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 16:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

615035 +++$+++ Wandalstouring +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-22 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.208892660E09 +++$+++ You should take a look at the featured article [[Battle of Cannae]] for comparison. The article needs a lot more citations. Try to finish at least every section with a citation where it can be verified. Another issue is that you should use one spelling variant for names, even if several are possible in Arabian, because otherwise a reader not familiar with Semitic languages gets easily confused. Some issues have been marked with a citation needed tag by me and an additional comment that can be seen when you edit the tag.  +++$+++ You should take a look at the featured article [[Battle of Cannae]] for comparison. The article needs a lot more citations. Try to finish at least every section with a citation where it can be verified. Another issue is that you should use one spelling variant for names, even if several are possible in Arabian, because otherwise a reader not familiar with Semitic languages gets easily confused. Some issues have been marked with a citation needed tag by me and an additional comment that can be seen when you edit the tag. [[User:Wandalstouring|Wandalstouring]] ([[User talk:Wandalstouring|talk]]) 12:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
615036 +++$+++ Wandalstouring +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615035 +++$+++ 615035 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.209067080E09 +++$+++ I researched a bit about the Byzantine army. I doubt that there were two European armies operating under different command. Probably European is confused with Greek and the two armies are the Asian and the European army augmented by three auxiliary forces (Slavs, Armenians, Arabs). A problem is that each of these Byzantine field armies had usually about 20,000 men, adding together to 40,000 well-equipped troops, absolutely sufficient to battle the Muslim forces on their own. Why they were possibly undermanned must certainly have been researched or was there really the unusual configuration that a field army was split? In this case it can absolutely not be an army of Europeans but one of Greeks from Asia Minor. What is really unclear from this article is who was the supreme commander of the Byzantine army in the field and how did the command structure of the Muslim forces work.  +++$+++ :I researched a bit about the Byzantine army. I doubt that there were two European armies operating under different command. Probably European is confused with Greek and the two armies are the Asian and the European army augmented by three auxiliary forces (Slavs, Armenians, Arabs). A problem is that each of these Byzantine field armies had usually about 20,000 men, adding together to 40,000 well-equipped troops, absolutely sufficient to battle the Muslim forces on their own. Why they were possibly undermanned must certainly have been researched or was there really the unusual configuration that a field army was split? In this case it can absolutely not be an army of Europeans but one of Greeks from Asia Minor. What is really unclear from this article is who was the supreme commander of the Byzantine army in the field and how did the command structure of the Muslim forces work. [[User:Wandalstouring|Wandalstouring]] ([[User talk:Wandalstouring|talk]]) 12:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
615037 +++$+++ Wandalstouring +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615035 +++$+++ 615036 +++$+++ 2008-04-27 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.209341220E09 +++$+++ I see your point about Europeans, but it is still wrong because half of the Greeks were not Europeans. Romans was the self designation of many inhabitants of the Byzantine Empire, so they are not really an ethnic group and Franks was just anything Germanic. You should perhaps find out which of their field armies was employed, the Asian army or the Asian and the European army. That would greatly help to assess the gravity of the defeat. What still makes me wonder is the low casualty rate for so many battles on the Muslim side, it would seem less superhuman if you could add the number of wounded soldiers for both sides. A question that came to my mind is whether this massive Byzantine buildup was necessary to compensate for less experienced troops and a lack of cavalry?  +++$+++ ::I see your point about Europeans, but it is still wrong because half of the Greeks were not Europeans. Romans was the self designation of many inhabitants of the Byzantine Empire, so they are not really an ethnic group and Franks was just anything Germanic. You should perhaps find out which of their field armies was employed, the Asian army or the Asian and the European army. That would greatly help to assess the gravity of the defeat. What still makes me wonder is the low casualty rate for so many battles on the Muslim side, it would seem less superhuman if you could add the number of wounded soldiers for both sides. A question that came to my mind is whether this massive Byzantine buildup was necessary to compensate for less experienced troops and a lack of cavalry? [[User:Wandalstouring|Wandalstouring]] ([[User talk:Wandalstouring|talk]]) 17:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
615038 +++$+++ Wandalstouring +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615035 +++$+++ 615037 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.209556200E09 +++$+++ It was generally assumed that the more numerous side has an advantage. Perhaps add \"many wounded\" or something like this to the Muslim army. What does merit mention is why the emperor himself was not present.  +++$+++ :::It was generally assumed that the more numerous side has an advantage. Perhaps add "many wounded" or something like this to the Muslim army. What does merit mention is why the emperor himself was not present. [[User:Wandalstouring|Wandalstouring]] ([[User talk:Wandalstouring|talk]]) 04:50, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
615039 +++$+++ Wandalstouring +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615035 +++$+++ 615038 +++$+++ 2008-05-04 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.209942180E09 +++$+++ Take all estimates from reliable sources and give the highest estimate and the lowest estimate of all sources together. I think that is the only possible approach. Internetsites are usually not reliable sources.  +++$+++ ::::Take all estimates from reliable sources and give the highest estimate and the lowest estimate of all sources together. I think that is the only possible approach. Internetsites are usually not reliable sources. [[User:Wandalstouring|Wandalstouring]] ([[User talk:Wandalstouring|talk]]) 16:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
615040 +++$+++ Wandalstouring +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615035 +++$+++ 615039 +++$+++ 2008-05-15 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.210867800E09 +++$+++ OK. I will edit Yarmouk on the weekend.  +++$+++ :::::OK. I will edit Yarmouk on the weekend. [[User:Wandalstouring|Wandalstouring]] ([[User talk:Wandalstouring|talk]]) 09:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
615041 +++$+++ Wandalstouring +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615035 +++$+++ 615040 +++$+++ 2008-05-19 08:02:00 +++$+++ 1.211209320E09 +++$+++ Sry, didn't have time, next weekend.  +++$+++ ::::::Sry, didn't have time, next weekend. [[User:Wandalstouring|Wandalstouring]] ([[User talk:Wandalstouring|talk]]) 08:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
615042 +++$+++ Wandalstouring +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615035 +++$+++ 615041 +++$+++ 2008-05-27 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.211934960E09 +++$+++ Sorry again, I had fairly little sleep and time to work on such a complicated topic, but I have the article on my watchlist and will work on it when I have time and can read more on the topic.  +++$+++ :::::::Sorry again, I had fairly little sleep and time to work on such a complicated topic, but I have the article on my watchlist and will work on it when I have time and can read more on the topic. [[User:Wandalstouring|Wandalstouring]] ([[User talk:Wandalstouring|talk]]) 17:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

20196 +++$+++  +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-03 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.280883600E09 +++$+++ [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px]][[Template:TIMESTAMP]] has been nominated for merging with [[Template:Currentdate]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:TIMESTAMP|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> '''<span style=\"font-family:garamond;white-space:nowrap;\"> +++$+++ [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px]][[Template:TIMESTAMP]] has been nominated for merging with [[Template:Currentdate]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:TIMESTAMP|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> '''<span style="font-family:garamond;white-space:nowrap;">[[User talk:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:IndianRed">Set Sail For The Seven Seas</span>]] [[New Earth Time|<span style="color:IndianRed">270° 5' 45" NET</span>]]</span>''' 18:00, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
20197 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20196 +++$+++ 20196 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 05:34:00 +++$+++ 1.282739640E09 +++$+++ Reading that same guideline I come up with \"Brito, Waldemar De\".-- +++$+++ :Reading that same guideline I come up with "Brito, Waldemar De".--[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] ([[User talk:Commander Keane|talk]]) 05:34, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
20198 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20196 +++$+++ 20197 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.282740000E09 +++$+++ Yes, thank you.  That was the article I was working on, and I went ahead and added the Defaultsort, as well as the listas to the talk page.  +++$+++ ::Yes, thank you.  That was the article I was working on, and I went ahead and added the Defaultsort, as well as the listas to the talk page. [[User:Rpyle731|Rpyle731]]<sup>[[User talk:Rpyle731|talk]]</sup> 05:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
20199 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20196 +++$+++ 20197 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.282739700E09 +++$+++ Well I came to the same conclusion as Rpyle731. Perhaps a trip to the talk page is in order?  +++$+++ ::Well I came to the same conclusion as Rpyle731. Perhaps a trip to the talk page is in order? [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  05:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
20200 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20196 +++$+++ 20199 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.282740120E09 +++$+++ I found a 1989 newspaper article (Chicago Sun-Times) refer to his family as just \"de Brito\".-- +++$+++ :::I found a 1989 newspaper article (Chicago Sun-Times) refer to his family as just "de Brito".--[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] ([[User talk:Commander Keane|talk]]) 05:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

282342 +++$+++ Paul foord +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282342 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-09 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.205053260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for picking the minimisation up at [[Maralinga, South Australia]]  +++$+++ Thanks for picking the minimisation up at [[Maralinga, South Australia]] [[User:Paul foord|Paul foord]] ([[User talk:Paul foord|talk]]) 01:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
282343 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282342 +++$+++ 282342 +++$+++ 2008-03-09 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.205058840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your very prompt support for my edits. I could not believe how the whole mess had been whitewashed! I worked for many years in Central Australia and have had the privilege of hearing first-hand many horrific stories from survivors of the Maralinga tests - both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal, and this rewrite of history really angered me. All best wishes.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your very prompt support for my edits. I could not believe how the whole mess had been whitewashed! I worked for many years in Central Australia and have had the privilege of hearing first-hand many horrific stories from survivors of the Maralinga tests - both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal, and this rewrite of history really angered me. All best wishes. [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 02:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

20201 +++$+++ Gggh +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-05 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.283742900E09 +++$+++ 'Start' class article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide '''enough''' sources to establish verifiability. --> <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ 'Start' class article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide '''enough''' sources to establish verifiability. --> <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Gggh|<font color="##000000">Gggh</font>]]</span>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Gggh|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Gggh|contribs]]</sub></small> 20:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
20202 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20201 +++$+++ 20201 +++$+++ 2010-09-05 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.283744880E09 +++$+++ Sorry.  Thanks for the heads up.   +++$+++ :Sorry.  Thanks for the heads up.  [[User:Rpyle731|Rpyle731]]<sup>[[User talk:Rpyle731|talk]]</sup> 20:48, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

20203 +++$+++ Sadads +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-12 08:09:00 +++$+++ 1.292170140E09 +++$+++ Hey doesn't assessing an article with AWB kindof defeat the point of assessment. When people assess articles, they get a chance to make minor changes on articles and make sure the article is categorized correctly according to the standard practice for their project. IMHO it is better to have the backlog (which I am aware is about 400,000 articles) than to just arbitrarily assess articles automatically with no indication that the article was assess through an automatic process.  +++$+++ Hey doesn't assessing an article with AWB kindof defeat the point of assessment. When people assess articles, they get a chance to make minor changes on articles and make sure the article is categorized correctly according to the standard practice for their project. IMHO it is better to have the backlog (which I am aware is about 400,000 articles) than to just arbitrarily assess articles automatically with no indication that the article was assess through an automatic process. [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 08:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
20204 +++$+++ Sadads +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20203 +++$+++ 20203 +++$+++ 2010-12-13 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.292244480E09 +++$+++ My concern is more that you are missing opportunities to clean up articles, including proper formatting and categorization, by pushing through the unnassessed articles with AWB. Generally, I make at least 3 clean up edits or tags for certain quality issues for every 3-4 articles I assess (if not more). The use of the semi-automated editor lessons the time you spend actually interacting with the page, and thus the liklihood of being able to actual make these clean up edits (which help move pages through backlogs and into backlogs so that they get more eyes on them).   +++$+++ :My concern is more that you are missing opportunities to clean up articles, including proper formatting and categorization, by pushing through the unnassessed articles with AWB. Generally, I make at least 3 clean up edits or tags for certain quality issues for every 3-4 articles I assess (if not more). The use of the semi-automated editor lessons the time you spend actually interacting with the page, and thus the liklihood of being able to actual make these clean up edits (which help move pages through backlogs and into backlogs so that they get more eyes on them).  [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 04:48, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

282348 +++$+++ KatherinePanciera +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-02 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.207127700E09 +++$+++ Hello. I am a graduate student in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Minnesota. We are conducting research on ways to engage content experts on Wikipedia. Previously, Wikipedia started the Adopt-a-User program to allow new users to get to know seasoned Wikipedia editors. We are interested in learning more about how this type of relationship works. Based on your editing record on Wikipedia, we thought you might be interested in participating. If chosen to participate, you will be compensated for your time. We estimate that most participants will spend an hour (over two weeks on your own time and from your own computer) on the study.  To learn more or to sign up contact katpa@cs.umn.edu or [[User:KatherinePanciera\/WPMentoring]]. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hello. I am a graduate student in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Minnesota. We are conducting research on ways to engage content experts on Wikipedia. Previously, Wikipedia started the Adopt-a-User program to allow new users to get to know seasoned Wikipedia editors. We are interested in learning more about how this type of relationship works. Based on your editing record on Wikipedia, we thought you might be interested in participating. If chosen to participate, you will be compensated for your time. We estimate that most participants will spend an hour (over two weeks on your own time and from your own computer) on the study.  To learn more or to sign up contact katpa@cs.umn.edu or [[User:KatherinePanciera/WPMentoring]]. Thanks. [[User:KatherinePanciera|KatherinePanciera]] ([[User talk:KatherinePanciera|talk]]) 02:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
282349 +++$+++ KatherinePanciera +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282348 +++$+++ 282348 +++$+++ 2008-04-03 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.207219800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the interest. We are actually not expecting you to be a content expert, but rather to work with some content experts in your role as an active Wikipedian. We'd love to have you in the study if you are still interested. If you send me an email, I'll give you more specific information. katpa@cs.umn.edu Thanks again.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the interest. We are actually not expecting you to be a content expert, but rather to work with some content experts in your role as an active Wikipedian. We'd love to have you in the study if you are still interested. If you send me an email, I'll give you more specific information. katpa@cs.umn.edu Thanks again. [[User:KatherinePanciera|KatherinePanciera]] ([[User talk:KatherinePanciera|talk]]) 03:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

20205 +++$+++ Hebrides +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-02 06:55:00 +++$+++ 1.293980100E09 +++$+++ Hello Robert. I'm puzzled as to why you added <nowiki>{{coord missing|Malaysia}}<\/nowiki> to the [[Balingian]] article. Do you really want me to duplicate the coordinate data from the infobox into a separate coord statement? \u2014  +++$+++ Hello Robert. I'm puzzled as to why you added <nowiki>{{coord missing|Malaysia}}</nowiki> to the [[Balingian]] article. Do you really want me to duplicate the coordinate data from the infobox into a separate coord statement? — [[User:Hebrides|Hebrides]] ([[User talk:Hebrides|talk]]) 06:55, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
20206 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20205 +++$+++ 20205 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.294147620E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I didn't see the coordinate data was already there.  I will remove the \"missing\" tag if it is still there.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I didn't see the coordinate data was already there.  I will remove the "missing" tag if it is still there. [[User:Rpyle731|Rpyle731]]<sup>[[User talk:Rpyle731|talk]]</sup> 05:27, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

282350 +++$+++ Angelo De La Paz +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-06 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.207520580E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Angelo De La Paz|Angelo De La Paz]] ([[User talk:Angelo De La Paz|talk]]) 15:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
282351 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282350 +++$+++ 282350 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 07:41:00 +++$+++ 1.208011260E09 +++$+++ I am happy for the deletion as it seems, in fact, that I (or someone else) have uploaded the same image to both the Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons by mistake. I just hope the image will continue to show up on all the pages and boxes in which it is now found. Thanks,  +++$+++ :I am happy for the deletion as it seems, in fact, that I (or someone else) have uploaded the same image to both the Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons by mistake. I just hope the image will continue to show up on all the pages and boxes in which it is now found. Thanks, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 07:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
282352 +++$+++ Sdrtirs +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282350 +++$+++ 282351 +++$+++ 2008-04-12 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.208039460E09 +++$+++ If the image stays in Wikimedia Commons for being for free use, it can be seen in ALL Wikipedia such en.wikipedia.org, pt.wikipedia.org, es.wikipedia.org, it.wikipedia.org and all others. And if it remains as the same name, as I did to this, it isn't need to change the articles to all images remains in the same articles that were before deletion on wikipedia. So don't worry! -- +++$+++ ::If the image stays in Wikimedia Commons for being for free use, it can be seen in ALL Wikipedia such en.wikipedia.org, pt.wikipedia.org, es.wikipedia.org, it.wikipedia.org and all others. And if it remains as the same name, as I did to this, it isn't need to change the articles to all images remains in the same articles that were before deletion on wikipedia. So don't worry! --[[User:Sdrtirs|Sdrtirs]] ([[User talk:Sdrtirs|talk]]) 15:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

544495 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-14 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.192412280E09 +++$+++ I would like to learn what in my arguments was [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship\/Danielfolsom&diff=prev&oldid=163440643 \"exceptionally intransigent and uncooperative\"]. I would very much like to learn from my mistakes. --<sub><span style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ I would like to learn what in my arguments was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Danielfolsom&diff=prev&oldid=163440643 "exceptionally intransigent and uncooperative"]. I would very much like to learn from my mistakes. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|&nbsp;Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&nbsp;]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></sub> 18:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
544496 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544495 +++$+++ 544495 +++$+++ 2007-10-14 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.192430040E09 +++$+++ As the author of close to 20 Featured articles and 10 Good Articles I used to be under the impression that my (rather frequent) contacts with reviewers are rather positive; hence my surprise at your comment. As Daniel has admitted in his FAC, it was his first review - something I was not aware at the time of the review and which certainly explains some of the misunderstandings we had. Nonetheless I believe that I throughout my discussion with him at [[Kiev Expedition (1018)]] I have acted in a manner consistent with [[WP:CIV]], and I addressed all of his (and your) points (note that addressing doesn't mean I had to agree with them). A civil difference of opinions is a perfectly normal part of an intellectual discourse. Again, I would like to see which statements I made struck you as \"exceptionally intransigent and uncooperative\" - forgive me, but if someone criticizes me so harshly I like to get to the bottom of this, so I can learn from my mistakes (or clarify some misunderstanding).--<sub><span style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :As the author of close to 20 Featured articles and 10 Good Articles I used to be under the impression that my (rather frequent) contacts with reviewers are rather positive; hence my surprise at your comment. As Daniel has admitted in his FAC, it was his first review - something I was not aware at the time of the review and which certainly explains some of the misunderstandings we had. Nonetheless I believe that I throughout my discussion with him at [[Kiev Expedition (1018)]] I have acted in a manner consistent with [[WP:CIV]], and I addressed all of his (and your) points (note that addressing doesn't mean I had to agree with them). A civil difference of opinions is a perfectly normal part of an intellectual discourse. Again, I would like to see which statements I made struck you as "exceptionally intransigent and uncooperative" - forgive me, but if someone criticizes me so harshly I like to get to the bottom of this, so I can learn from my mistakes (or clarify some misunderstanding).--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|&nbsp;Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&nbsp;]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></sub> 23:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
544497 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544495 +++$+++ 544496 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.192432800E09 +++$+++ Of course we are all entitled to our own impressions. I would nonetheless ask you - in your free time - to review the discussion again. I think your description of my behavior (as cited above) was highly unfair, and I would appreciate it if you could present a specific citation that you view as fitting such a description. Forgive me, but I believe such an accusation, particularly when used on a highly public forum like RfA, should be either backed up with a diff - or refactored.--<sub><span style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::Of course we are all entitled to our own impressions. I would nonetheless ask you - in your free time - to review the discussion again. I think your description of my behavior (as cited above) was highly unfair, and I would appreciate it if you could present a specific citation that you view as fitting such a description. Forgive me, but I believe such an accusation, particularly when used on a highly public forum like RfA, should be either backed up with a diff - or refactored.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|&nbsp;Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&nbsp;]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></sub> 00:20, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
544498 +++$+++ Piotrus +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544495 +++$+++ 544497 +++$+++ 2007-10-15 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.192433760E09 +++$+++ Thank you. While I think I was rather cooperative, the current comment is certainly much more civil. I believe it is crucial to moderate ourselves in order to maintain a pleasant working atmosphere on the project. Take care, --<sub><span style=\"border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ :::Thank you. While I think I was rather cooperative, the current comment is certainly much more civil. I believe it is crucial to moderate ourselves in order to maintain a pleasant working atmosphere on the project. Take care, --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|&nbsp;Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&nbsp;]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></sub> 00:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

544499 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544499 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-14 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.192413600E09 +++$+++ I'm just closing the GAR for [[Veganism]], where the main concerns were NPOV issues. I agree with these concerns, but notice that you did not raise any during your initial review for GAN. Since I have great regard for your judgement, I wonder if you could check the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment\/Archive 31#Veganism|archived discussion]] and give me your opinion in the light of my comments there. Possibly my POV antenna is too sensitive, but I believe the concerns are genuine. Thanks, '' +++$+++ I'm just closing the GAR for [[Veganism]], where the main concerns were NPOV issues. I agree with these concerns, but notice that you did not raise any during your initial review for GAN. Since I have great regard for your judgement, I wonder if you could check the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 31#Veganism|archived discussion]] and give me your opinion in the light of my comments there. Possibly my POV antenna is too sensitive, but I believe the concerns are genuine. Thanks, ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 19:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
544500 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544499 +++$+++ 544499 +++$+++ 2007-10-14 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.192429440E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry but I can't do that, I disassociated myself from that review when it became clear that I and one of the editors on that page were unable to work together in a constructive manner. [[User:Gosgood]] took it over for me and did an excellent job, you might want to get in touch with him. All the best  +++$+++ :I'm sorry but I can't do that, I disassociated myself from that review when it became clear that I and one of the editors on that page were unable to work together in a constructive manner. [[User:Gosgood]] took it over for me and did an excellent job, you might want to get in touch with him. All the best [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] 23:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
544501 +++$+++ Geometry guy +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544499 +++$+++ 544500 +++$+++ 2007-10-14 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.192429860E09 +++$+++ Thanks anyway Tim. I wasn't actually asking for you to get involved, just looking for some personal feedback (e.g. by email), but I entirely understand if you don't want to comment. I already contacted Gosgood, but thanks for the suggestion. Cheers, '' +++$+++ ::Thanks anyway Tim. I wasn't actually asking for you to get involved, just looking for some personal feedback (e.g. by email), but I entirely understand if you don't want to comment. I already contacted Gosgood, but thanks for the suggestion. Cheers, ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

20212 +++$+++ John +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20212 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-09 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.307669280E09 +++$+++ How on earth did you correct my stupidity [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Harold_Strachan&action=historysubmit&diff=433326174&oldid=433320348 here]? In any case, thanks very much. -- +++$+++ How on earth did you correct my stupidity [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harold_Strachan&action=historysubmit&diff=433326174&oldid=433320348 here]? In any case, thanks very much. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 18:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
20213 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20212 +++$+++ 20212 +++$+++ 2011-06-10 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.307708640E09 +++$+++ You're welcome, John.  Just doing my WikiGnome thing.  +++$+++ :You're welcome, John.  Just doing my WikiGnome thing. [[User:Rpyle731|Rpyle731]]<sup>[[User talk:Rpyle731|talk]]</sup> 05:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

20214 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20214 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-18 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.308399840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your work  on  fixing  stubs. It's not  often that  I  don't  find the right  one, but  after 2 or 3 tries I  give up! -- +++$+++ Thanks for your work  on  fixing  stubs. It's not  often that  I  don't  find the right  one, but  after 2 or 3 tries I  give up! --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 05:24, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
20215 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ Rpyle731 +++$+++ 20214 +++$+++ 20214 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.308400980E09 +++$+++ You're welcome  +++$+++ :You're welcome [[User:Rpyle731|Rpyle731]]<sup>[[User talk:Rpyle731|talk]]</sup> 05:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

396585 +++$+++ Robotman1974 +++$+++ Delirium +++$+++ 396585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-25 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.172470140E09 +++$+++ Hi again Delirium, I just had an [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Robotman1974&diff=prev&oldid=110917188 edit] and revert to my talk page from a new user.  The talk page of that user looks [[User talk:Bbb00723|awfully]] [[User talk:Kgb23|familiar]] to me, so I'll be watching the edits made from that account.  I don't know if it's appropriate to say the [[WP:SOCK|S]]-word, so just a heads up I guess.  +++$+++ Hi again Delirium, I just had an [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robotman1974&diff=prev&oldid=110917188 edit] and revert to my talk page from a new user.  The talk page of that user looks [[User talk:Bbb00723|awfully]] [[User talk:Kgb23|familiar]] to me, so I'll be watching the edits made from that account.  I don't know if it's appropriate to say the [[WP:SOCK|S]]-word, so just a heads up I guess. [[User:Robotman1974|Robotman]][[User talk:Robotman1974|<sup>1974</sup>]] 22:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
396586 +++$+++ Robotman1974 +++$+++ Delirium +++$+++ 396585 +++$+++ 396585 +++$+++ 2007-02-25 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.172470260E09 +++$+++ Nevermind... after [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Robotman1974&diff=prev&oldid=110921468 this] edit I'll come out and say that I think Peace237 is a sock puppet of Bbb00723.  +++$+++ :Nevermind... after [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robotman1974&diff=prev&oldid=110921468 this] edit I'll come out and say that I think Peace237 is a sock puppet of Bbb00723. [[User:Robotman1974|Robotman]][[User talk:Robotman1974|<sup>1974</sup>]] 22:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

20216 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20216 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-23 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.243133640E09 +++$+++ Please add an exception for \"decads\" in [[Decimal time#Decimal times in fiction]]. Because this is fictional and matches Asimov's spelling of \"centads\", it should not be changed to \"decades\". \u2014  +++$+++ Please add an exception for "decads" in [[Decimal time#Decimal times in fiction]]. Because this is fictional and matches Asimov's spelling of "centads", it should not be changed to "decades". — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress|talk]]) 19:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
20217 +++$+++ CmdrObot +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20216 +++$+++ 20216 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.243133760E09 +++$+++ Cheers,  +++$+++ : Cheers, [[User:CmdrObot|CmdrObot]] ([[User talk:CmdrObot|talk]]) 19:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

20219 +++$+++ Languagehat +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-21 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.245647100E09 +++$+++ Why did you remove my reference?  +++$+++ Why did you remove my reference? [[User:Languagehat|Languagehat]] ([[User talk:Languagehat|talk]]) 22:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
20220 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20219 +++$+++ 20219 +++$+++ 2009-06-21 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.245653160E09 +++$+++ Answered at [[Talk:Greek numerals#Alternate name ref]]. \u2014  +++$+++ :Answered at [[Talk:Greek numerals#Alternate name ref]]. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 23:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

282364 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-30 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.209603480E09 +++$+++ Hi, I think you added that \"(wrongly)\" to the claim that erdene zuu was the first monastery in mongolia. is this because there were other monasteries in inner mongolia before, or because there were other monasteries in outer mongolia before? discussion is at [[Talk: History of Tibet]]. Regards,  +++$+++ Hi, I think you added that "(wrongly)" to the claim that erdene zuu was the first monastery in mongolia. is this because there were other monasteries in inner mongolia before, or because there were other monasteries in outer mongolia before? discussion is at [[Talk: History of Tibet]]. Regards, [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 17:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
282365 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282364 +++$+++ 282364 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.209621720E09 +++$+++ Hi, Yaan! I have just adjusted the article on the [[History of Tibet]] and left a discussion on the Talk Page about the confusion. The earlier monastery was, of course, built by Altan Khan at his capital in what is now Hohhot, Inner Mongolia (which has now been absorbed by China). Since the state of modern Mongolia does not include this region it is technically correct to say that Erdene Zuu was the first monastery built in Mongolia - though, of course, the separation of Mongolia and Inner Mongolia is really a modern event. Anyway, if you have any further questions (or are not happy with the adjustments I have made to the History of Tibet article), please let me know. Best wishes,  +++$+++ :Hi, Yaan! I have just adjusted the article on the [[History of Tibet]] and left a discussion on the Talk Page about the confusion. The earlier monastery was, of course, built by Altan Khan at his capital in what is now Hohhot, Inner Mongolia (which has now been absorbed by China). Since the state of modern Mongolia does not include this region it is technically correct to say that Erdene Zuu was the first monastery built in Mongolia - though, of course, the separation of Mongolia and Inner Mongolia is really a modern event. Anyway, if you have any further questions (or are not happy with the adjustments I have made to the History of Tibet article), please let me know. Best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 23:02, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

20221 +++$+++ Oriel36 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-10 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.247273220E09 +++$+++ http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Earth%27s_rotation +++$+++ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Earth%27s_rotation[[User:Oriel36|Oriel36]] ([[User talk:Oriel36|talk]]) 17:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
20222 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20221 +++$+++ 20221 +++$+++ 2009-07-10 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.247280360E09 +++$+++ Answered at [[Talk:Earth's rotation#Earth's rotation in 24 hours]]. \u2014  +++$+++ :Answered at [[Talk:Earth's rotation#Earth's rotation in 24 hours]]. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 19:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

282366 +++$+++ Iacobus +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-01 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.209644280E09 +++$+++ On [[:Category:Child rulers from Asia]] - d'oh! Thanks for picking up that slip!-- +++$+++ On [[:Category:Child rulers from Asia]] - d'oh! Thanks for picking up that slip!--[[User:Iacobus|Iacobus]] ([[User talk:Iacobus|talk]]) 05:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
282367 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282366 +++$+++ 282366 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.209644940E09 +++$+++ No worries in the least - I make similar slips all the time. All best wishes,  +++$+++ :No worries in the least - I make similar slips all the time. All best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 05:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

20223 +++$+++  +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-03 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.249368600E09 +++$+++ Hi, I noticed that you prefer the article to be at 180th meridian as opposed to antimeridian, yet the edit summary says, \"antimeridian depends on prime meridian\". If this is the case, then would it not be better to name the article \"antimeridian\", since all the points on the antimeridian have an antipode on the prime meridian? Thanks. <!--[[User:Where\/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black| +++$+++ Hi, I noticed that you prefer the article to be at 180th meridian as opposed to antimeridian, yet the edit summary says, "antimeridian depends on prime meridian". If this is the case, then would it not be better to name the article "antimeridian", since all the points on the antimeridian have an antipode on the prime meridian? Thanks. <!--[[User:Where/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black|[[User:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:red">'''Set&nbsp;Sail'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:blue">'''For&nbsp;The'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Thesevenseas|<span style="color:yellow">'''Seven&nbsp;Seas'''</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[New Earth Time|<span style="color:mediumspringgreen">'''357°&nbsp;30'&nbsp;00"&nbsp;NET'''</span>]]}}&nbsp;&nbsp;<!--ESC:Thesevenseas--> 23:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
20224 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20223 +++$+++ 20223 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.249448220E09 +++$+++ Answered at [[Talk:180th meridian#Article name]]. \u2014  +++$+++ :Answered at [[Talk:180th meridian#Article name]]. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 21:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
20225 +++$+++  +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20223 +++$+++ 20224 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.249452600E09 +++$+++ {{tl|notice|New message at [[Talk:180th_meridian#Article_name|180th Meridian Talk Page]]}} <!--[[User:Where\/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black| +++$+++ ::{{tl|notice|New message at [[Talk:180th_meridian#Article_name|180th Meridian Talk Page]]}} <!--[[User:Where/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black|[[User:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:red">'''Set&nbsp;Sail'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:blue">'''For&nbsp;The'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Thesevenseas|<span style="color:yellow">'''Seven&nbsp;Seas'''</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[New Earth Time|<span style="color:mediumspringgreen">'''347°&nbsp;30'&nbsp;00"&nbsp;NET'''</span>]]}}&nbsp;&nbsp;<!--ESC:Thesevenseas--> 23:10, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

282368 +++$+++ Barefact +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-01 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.209647340E09 +++$+++ Dear John, thank you for your very kind words. Actually lately I was mostly adding to [[Turkology]].  From WordWeb [[http:\/\/wordweb.info\/free\/]]: \"peripety, peripeties, peripetias, peripeteias\" A sudden and unexpected change of fortune or reverse of circumstances (especially in a literary work). What they should also have said is that this change of fortune has negative connotations. If you suddenly won a lottery, it is not a peripety, but if you have won, and your ticket was stolen, then it is. Also, [[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Peripeteia]]. WordWeb suggests \"surprise\" as a synonym, but it does not have a right connotation, and I could not find a simpler word to properly phrase a sentence. Any improvement would be very welcome. Until end of May I am in Latin America, with somewhat problematic access sometimes. Be aware that your words are a great joy for me. -- +++$+++ Dear John, thank you for your very kind words. Actually lately I was mostly adding to [[Turkology]].  From WordWeb [[http://wordweb.info/free/]]: "peripety, peripeties, peripetias, peripeteias" A sudden and unexpected change of fortune or reverse of circumstances (especially in a literary work). What they should also have said is that this change of fortune has negative connotations. If you suddenly won a lottery, it is not a peripety, but if you have won, and your ticket was stolen, then it is. Also, [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripeteia]]. WordWeb suggests "surprise" as a synonym, but it does not have a right connotation, and I could not find a simpler word to properly phrase a sentence. Any improvement would be very welcome. Until end of May I am in Latin America, with somewhat problematic access sometimes. Be aware that your words are a great joy for me. --[[User:Barefact|Barefact]] ([[User talk:Barefact|talk]]) 06:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
282369 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282368 +++$+++ 282368 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 06:59:00 +++$+++ 1.209650340E09 +++$+++ Have fun on your trip. I send you my very best wishes,  +++$+++ :Have fun on your trip. I send you my very best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 06:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
282370 +++$+++ Barefact +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282368 +++$+++ 282369 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.209652800E09 +++$+++ I had exactly the same gut feeling that the phrase used an \"uncommon\" word, but could not find a good replacement. I vote for with both hands. Please revise, and if you couls just cursory attend to my suggestion to add some meat to Place of origin of the Yuezhi in [[Yuezhi]] - [[Talk:Yuezhi]], I hope that even the narrative without a map would add to the contents of the article. Thank you again -- +++$+++ ::I had exactly the same gut feeling that the phrase used an "uncommon" word, but could not find a good replacement. I vote for with both hands. Please revise, and if you couls just cursory attend to my suggestion to add some meat to Place of origin of the Yuezhi in [[Yuezhi]] - [[Talk:Yuezhi]], I hope that even the narrative without a map would add to the contents of the article. Thank you again --[[User:Barefact|Barefact]] ([[User talk:Barefact|talk]]) 07:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

20226 +++$+++  +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-09 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.249884480E09 +++$+++ This has overlapped with the picture. This problem is now back again. There maybe another way to fix it that I'm not aware of, but it does the job for now. It seems justified to putback the break tag. Thanks. <!--[[User:Where\/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black| +++$+++ This has overlapped with the picture. This problem is now back again. There maybe another way to fix it that I'm not aware of, but it does the job for now. It seems justified to putback the break tag. Thanks. <!--[[User:Where/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black|[[User:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:red">'''Set&nbsp;Sail'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:blue">'''For&nbsp;The'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Thesevenseas|<span style="color:yellow">'''Seven&nbsp;Seas'''</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[New Earth Time|<span style="color:mediumspringgreen">'''347°&nbsp;00'&nbsp;00"&nbsp;NET'''</span>]]}}&nbsp;&nbsp;<!--ESC:Thesevenseas--> 23:08, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
20227 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20226 +++$+++ 20226 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.249892940E09 +++$+++ What browser are you using? No overlap exists in either IE7 and FF2 on my computer when I view [[Equinox#Cultural aspects of the equinox]]. \u2014  +++$+++ :What browser are you using? No overlap exists in either IE7 and FF2 on my computer when I view [[Equinox#Cultural aspects of the equinox]]. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 01:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
20228 +++$+++  +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20226 +++$+++ 20227 +++$+++ 2009-08-10 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.249929120E09 +++$+++ I'm using Firefox 3.0.13, in which the text doesn't appear to wrap around the picture properly. It might a problem with the brower as opposed to the page. Thanks. <!--[[User:Where\/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black| +++$+++ ::I'm using Firefox 3.0.13, in which the text doesn't appear to wrap around the picture properly. It might a problem with the brower as opposed to the page. Thanks. <!--[[User:Where/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black|[[User:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:red">'''Set&nbsp;Sail'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:blue">'''For&nbsp;The'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Thesevenseas|<span style="color:yellow">'''Seven&nbsp;Seas'''</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[New Earth Time|<span style="color:mediumspringgreen">'''173°&nbsp;00'&nbsp;00"&nbsp;NET'''</span>]]}}&nbsp;&nbsp;<!--ESC:Thesevenseas--> 11:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
20229 +++$+++  +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20226 +++$+++ 20228 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.252557060E09 +++$+++ {{fixed}} <!--[[User:Where\/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black| +++$+++ :::{{fixed}} <!--[[User:Where/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black|[[User:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:red">'''Set&nbsp;Sail'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:blue">'''For&nbsp;The'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Thesevenseas|<span style="color:yellow">'''Seven&nbsp;Seas'''</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[New Earth Time|<span style="color:mediumspringgreen">'''322°&nbsp;55'&nbsp;15"&nbsp;NET'''</span>]]}}&nbsp;&nbsp;<!--ESC:Thesevenseas--> 21:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

282372 +++$+++ FACT NEEDED +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282372 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-09 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.210332060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:FACT NEEDED|FACT NEEDED]] ([[User talk:FACT NEEDED|talk]]) 04:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
282373 +++$+++ FACT NEEDED +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282372 +++$+++ 282372 +++$+++ 2008-05-09 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.210334160E09 +++$+++ Dear Mr. Hill, Thanks for the understanding!. Your translation is a great accomplishment indeed!. All the best!!  +++$+++ : Dear Mr. Hill, Thanks for the understanding!. Your translation is a great accomplishment indeed!. All the best!! [[User:FACT NEEDED|FACT NEEDED]] ([[User talk:FACT NEEDED|talk]]) 04:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

544517 +++$+++ Sushant gupta +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544517 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-19 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.192822200E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, well is the following template serving any purpose. i mean [[template:evolution3]] already exists. thanks,  +++$+++ Hi Tim, well is the following template serving any purpose. i mean [[template:evolution3]] already exists. thanks, [[User:Sushant gupta|Sushant gupta]] 12:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
544518 +++$+++ Sushant gupta +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544517 +++$+++ 544517 +++$+++ 2007-10-19 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.192828380E09 +++$+++ mechanisms and processes of evolution- i have nominated for GAC. i won't be available here for a bit long time. kindly maintain this article. thanks,  +++$+++ : mechanisms and processes of evolution- i have nominated for GAC. i won't be available here for a bit long time. kindly maintain this article. thanks, [[User:Sushant gupta|Sushant gupta]] 14:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

20232 +++$+++  +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-10 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.252612380E09 +++$+++ Hi again, it seem that once again you have reverted my edit. Generally exponentiation is written using superscripts. The only reason that the page name didn't have this superscript is because html tags can't be used for page names to give the exponentiation required; but the link name can use html tags, so it should be perfectly justified to restore the superscript tags to the link name. Thanks. <!--[[User:Where\/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black| +++$+++ Hi again, it seem that once again you have reverted my edit. Generally exponentiation is written using superscripts. The only reason that the page name didn't have this superscript is because html tags can't be used for page names to give the exponentiation required; but the link name can use html tags, so it should be perfectly justified to restore the superscript tags to the link name. Thanks. <!--[[User:Where/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black|[[User:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:red">'''Set&nbsp;Sail'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:blue">'''For&nbsp;The'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Thesevenseas|<span style="color:yellow">'''Seven&nbsp;Seas'''</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[New Earth Time|<span style="color:mediumspringgreen">'''193°&nbsp;27'&nbsp;30"&nbsp;NET'''</span>]]}}&nbsp;&nbsp;<!--ESC:Thesevenseas--> 12:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
20233 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20232 +++$+++ 20232 +++$+++ 2009-09-11 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.252654140E09 +++$+++ I found an exception to the general rule against piping in [[WP:PIPING]] for technical reasons, so I won't object. However, I think the short line under the superscript in linked names is ugly ([[1 E4 s|10{{sup|4}}]])\u2014the underline indicating a link should be continuous with that under normally sized characters. You might consider replacing <nowiki>10<sup>4<\/sup><\/nowiki> with <nowiki>10{{sup|4}}<\/nowiki> due to the smaller number of typed characters. Although personal preference, {{nowrap|<nowiki>10{{smallsup|4}}<\/nowiki>}} results in a smaller superscript font: 10{{smallsup|4}} vs 10<sup>4<\/sup>. \u2014  +++$+++ :I found an exception to the general rule against piping in [[WP:PIPING]] for technical reasons, so I won't object. However, I think the short line under the superscript in linked names is ugly ([[1 E4 s|10{{sup|4}}]])—the underline indicating a link should be continuous with that under normally sized characters. You might consider replacing <nowiki>10<sup>4</sup></nowiki> with <nowiki>10{{sup|4}}</nowiki> due to the smaller number of typed characters. Although personal preference, {{nowrap|<nowiki>10{{smallsup|4}}</nowiki>}} results in a smaller superscript font: 10{{smallsup|4}} vs 10<sup>4</sup>. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 00:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
20234 +++$+++  +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20232 +++$+++ 20233 +++$+++ 2009-09-11 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.252714860E09 +++$+++ I wasn't actually aware of the \"sup\" and \"smallsup\" templates. It is a lot more convenient and the small superscript does look a lot better. I'll probably use that one, thanks for that tip. <!--[[User:Where\/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black| +++$+++ ::I wasn't actually aware of the "sup" and "smallsup" templates. It is a lot more convenient and the small superscript does look a lot better. I'll probably use that one, thanks for that tip. <!--[[User:Where/sigContract]];Thesevenseas-->&nbsp;&nbsp;{{fontcolor||Black|[[User:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:red">'''Set&nbsp;Sail'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Thesevenseas|<span style="color:blue">'''For&nbsp;The'''</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Thesevenseas|<span style="color:yellow">'''Seven&nbsp;Seas'''</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[New Earth Time|<span style="color:mediumspringgreen">'''260°&nbsp;22'&nbsp;30"&nbsp;NET'''</span>]]}}&nbsp;&nbsp;<!--ESC:Thesevenseas--> 17:21, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

20235 +++$+++ Chris-do-algarve +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20235 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-20 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.256091000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Chris-do-algarve|Chris-do-algarve]] ([[User talk:Chris-do-algarve|talk]]) 19:10, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
20236 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20235 +++$+++ 20235 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 07:37:00 +++$+++ 1.256135820E09 +++$+++ I do not use e-mail with Wikipedia. I do not know what you mean by a \"bronze calendar\". I have no interest whatsoever in proposed calendars, only in historical or existing calendars. \u2014  +++$+++ :I do not use e-mail with Wikipedia. I do not know what you mean by a "bronze calendar". I have no interest whatsoever in proposed calendars, only in historical or existing calendars. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 07:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

282380 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282380 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-11 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.210527120E09 +++$+++ I absolutely agree with you. The most important thing is that the history section is completely balanced and it flows in an informative section which highlights the most important events in its history but isn't too long and POV. But without a doubt it needs a great deal of work as writing a summary of a huge history isn't an easy task to say the least. WHat I did is try to filter out what I didn't think was important for the main article and give it the bones to work around it and come up with the goods between us all. SOme of it may not be focused in places particularly modern history but it should all completely flow, be reliably referenced and neutrally balanced. What is very important however is that it has the ability to summarize the main points in its history which is very informative and develops an understanding but is done so in the most concise way possible.Best regards +++$+++ I absolutely agree with you. The most important thing is that the history section is completely balanced and it flows in an informative section which highlights the most important events in its history but isn't too long and POV. But without a doubt it needs a great deal of work as writing a summary of a huge history isn't an easy task to say the least. WHat I did is try to filter out what I didn't think was important for the main article and give it the bones to work around it and come up with the goods between us all. SOme of it may not be focused in places particularly modern history but it should all completely flow, be reliably referenced and neutrally balanced. What is very important however is that it has the ability to summarize the main points in its history which is very informative and develops an understanding but is done so in the most concise way possible.Best regards[[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:navy;">'''''♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">'''White Cat'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 10:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
282381 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282380 +++$+++ 282380 +++$+++ 2008-05-11 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.210527540E09 +++$+++ I will try to do what I can while on this trip - but it may not be much, unfortunately - and now is when large numbers of people are likely to be checking the Wikipedia for information on Tibet. Also, of course, all the material in the [[History of Tibet]] article needs to be rechecked and tidied up. Sorry to leave you such a headache! I send you my apologies once again and all best wishes and thanks for your concern and hard work.  +++$+++ :I will try to do what I can while on this trip - but it may not be much, unfortunately - and now is when large numbers of people are likely to be checking the Wikipedia for information on Tibet. Also, of course, all the material in the [[History of Tibet]] article needs to be rechecked and tidied up. Sorry to leave you such a headache! I send you my apologies once again and all best wishes and thanks for your concern and hard work. [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 10:39, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

20237 +++$+++ Michael C Price +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-14 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.258213200E09 +++$+++ Hi, you seem to be editting the entire talk page, rather than just individual sections.  This makes it harder for other readers to tell which section you've added your comments to.  Thought you might like to know. -- +++$+++ Hi, you seem to be editting the entire talk page, rather than just individual sections.  This makes it harder for other readers to tell which section you've added your comments to.  Thought you might like to know. --[[User:MichaelCPrice|Michael C. Price]] <sup>[[User talk:Michael C Price|talk]]</sup> 07:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
20238 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20237 +++$+++ 20237 +++$+++ 2009-11-14 09:55:00 +++$+++ 1.258221300E09 +++$+++ You are correct. Although I have \"Enable [[Help:Section#section editing|section editing]] via [edit] links\" checked in my preferences, I almost never use it. I always click on the \"edit this page\" tab, rather than a section of the page. I've used this method since before section editing was even allowed in Wikipedia. Indeed, just finding the section [edit] is difficult on talk pages with long active sections. I easily find edits anywhere within articles or talk pages by clicking on \"hist\" to the right of any articles or talk pages on my watchlist and then \"compare selected revisions\" since the last time I checked the page. This allows me to find multiple edits by editors (including vandals) anywhere on the page. A watchlist only indicates the last section edited by the last editor of any article or talk page, so that is useless for finding multiple edits. Clicking on the names of articles or talk pages on my watch list and then clicking on its history is indirect. Furthermore, clicking on the individual time\/date of edits within an article's history is much too slow for me. Nevertheless, I'll try to use section editing on at least talk pages for those that don't use my technique. \u2014  +++$+++ :You are correct. Although I have "Enable [[Help:Section#section editing|section editing]] via [edit] links" checked in my preferences, I almost never use it. I always click on the "edit this page" tab, rather than a section of the page. I've used this method since before section editing was even allowed in Wikipedia. Indeed, just finding the section [edit] is difficult on talk pages with long active sections. I easily find edits anywhere within articles or talk pages by clicking on "hist" to the right of any articles or talk pages on my watchlist and then "compare selected revisions" since the last time I checked the page. This allows me to find multiple edits by editors (including vandals) anywhere on the page. A watchlist only indicates the last section edited by the last editor of any article or talk page, so that is useless for finding multiple edits. Clicking on the names of articles or talk pages on my watch list and then clicking on its history is indirect. Furthermore, clicking on the individual time/date of edits within an article's history is much too slow for me. Nevertheless, I'll try to use section editing on at least talk pages for those that don't use my technique. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 09:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
20239 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20237 +++$+++ 20237 +++$+++ 2009-11-14 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.258265400E09 +++$+++ I just tried to use a section edit in an article and found it utterly useless if a reference is included, because the text of references are in another section which is not shown in \"Show preview\". \u2014  +++$+++ :I just tried to use a section edit in an article and found it utterly useless if a reference is included, because the text of references are in another section which is not shown in "Show preview". — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 22:10, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
20240 +++$+++ Michael C Price +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20237 +++$+++ 20239 +++$+++ 2009-11-14 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.258267020E09 +++$+++ Yes, good point.  That is a real drawback with section editing.  Swings and roundabouts, I guess.  -- +++$+++ ::Yes, good point.  That is a real drawback with section editing.  Swings and roundabouts, I guess.  --[[User:MichaelCPrice|Michael C. Price]] <sup>[[User talk:Michael C Price|talk]]</sup> 22:37, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
20241 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20237 +++$+++ 20237 +++$+++ 2009-11-15 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.258273800E09 +++$+++ A workaround is to temporarily add a <nowiki><references\/><\/nowiki> or <nowiki>{{reflist}}<\/nowiki> tag at the end of the section prior to previewing it, but that temporary tag must be removed before the edit is saved. \u2014  +++$+++ :A workaround is to temporarily add a <nowiki><references/></nowiki> or <nowiki>{{reflist}}</nowiki> tag at the end of the section prior to previewing it, but that temporary tag must be removed before the edit is saved. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 00:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

282382 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282382 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-11 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.210527540E09 +++$+++ Thanks again to both of you for your hard work and concern. I do think getting this right is really very important and there is a real urgency to getting it done now - I just wish I had more time and energy to work on it myself - so I am having to dump most of the responsibility on you and other well-intentioned people. Cheers, and best wishes with it all.  +++$+++ Thanks again to both of you for your hard work and concern. I do think getting this right is really very important and there is a real urgency to getting it done now - I just wish I had more time and energy to work on it myself - so I am having to dump most of the responsibility on you and other well-intentioned people. Cheers, and best wishes with it all. [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 10:39, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
282383 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282382 +++$+++ 282382 +++$+++ 2008-05-11 12:32:00 +++$+++ 1.210534320E09 +++$+++ Good idea! I started trying to edit a bit tonight but had to give up a while ago. I think your idea is better. Perhaps if we all tried to do a bullet list and then compared them it would help. don't know when I am going to be able to do it - but will certainly try. If not, I should be at least able to make comments on others' bullet lists. I think the Tibet Talk Page might be an excellent forum which would also probably attract others into the project. Cheers and thanks,  +++$+++ :Good idea! I started trying to edit a bit tonight but had to give up a while ago. I think your idea is better. Perhaps if we all tried to do a bullet list and then compared them it would help. don't know when I am going to be able to do it - but will certainly try. If not, I should be at least able to make comments on others' bullet lists. I think the Tibet Talk Page might be an excellent forum which would also probably attract others into the project. Cheers and thanks, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 12:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

309208 +++$+++ 76.16.176.166 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-28 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.246250640E09 +++$+++ Reding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lucy_(Australopithecus)&diff=299181455&oldid=299179701 this] somebody my get impression that I misrepresented the truth. [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=HgGNlFMM5XQC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_navlinks_s Google preview] [[Special:Contributions\/76.16.176.166|76.16.176.166]] ( +++$+++ Reding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lucy_(Australopithecus)&diff=299181455&oldid=299179701 this] somebody my get impression that I misrepresented the truth. [http://books.google.com/books?id=HgGNlFMM5XQC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_navlinks_s Google preview] [[Special:Contributions/76.16.176.166|76.16.176.166]] ([[User talk:76.16.176.166|talk]]) 21:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
309209 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 2009-06-28 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.246252440E09 +++$+++ Doesn't work for me, I'll accept that the US edition differs. However, I'm sure Johanson didn't write \"We stod up and see other bits of bone\", and it's not clear what you meant the addition to convey. . .  +++$+++ :Doesn't work for me, I'll accept that the US edition differs. However, I'm sure Johanson didn't write "We stod up and see other bits of bone", and it's not clear what you meant the addition to convey. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:14, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
309210 +++$+++ 76.16.176.166 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 309209 +++$+++ 2009-06-29 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.246261740E09 +++$+++ just click the link and scroll down. Do you suggest to suspect forgery in Google book copyrighted material or other CSA ? [[Special:Contributions\/76.16.176.166|76.16.176.166]] ( +++$+++ :: just click the link and scroll down. Do you suggest to suspect forgery in Google book copyrighted material or other CSA ? [[Special:Contributions/76.16.176.166|76.16.176.166]] ([[User talk:76.16.176.166|talk]]) 00:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
309211 +++$+++ Arcayne +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 10:12:00 +++$+++ 1.246468320E09 +++$+++ and again. -  +++$+++ :and again. - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 10:12, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
309212 +++$+++ KillerChihuahua +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.246482060E09 +++$+++ Hi, would you mind asking arcayne where he requested I stay away from his talk page? I don't find it, but he says he [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Arcayne&diff=prev&oldid=299685582 did].  +++$+++ :Hi, would you mind asking arcayne where he requested I stay away from his talk page? I don't find it, but he says he [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arcayne&diff=prev&oldid=299685582 did]. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup> 14:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
309213 +++$+++ Arcayne +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 309212 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.246484700E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:KillerChihuahua&diff=299598566&oldid=299576282 Here]. To whit: ''\"And just so we're clear - I don't need to receive a response from you on my talk page.\"'' In essence, someone who assumes the worst in me is not an ideal source of advice or input to me. -  +++$+++ ::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KillerChihuahua&diff=299598566&oldid=299576282 Here]. To whit: ''"And just so we're clear - I don't need to receive a response from you on my talk page."'' In essence, someone who assumes the worst in me is not an ideal source of advice or input to me. - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 14:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
309214 +++$+++ Arcayne +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 309212 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.246485720E09 +++$+++ ('''ec''')I guess it doesn't matter, as I think KC [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:KillerChihuahua&diff=prev&oldid=299699963 isn't really interested] in when, anyway.  -  +++$+++ ::('''ec''')I guess it doesn't matter, as I think KC [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KillerChihuahua&diff=prev&oldid=299699963 isn't really interested] in when, anyway.  - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 15:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
309215 +++$+++ KillerChihuahua +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.246485000E09 +++$+++ \"I don't need\" is lightyears away from \"please do not\". I had no idea you viewed that as a request to not post on your talk page, Arcayne. I will consider this. I advise you to be more precise in your phrasing in the future.  +++$+++ :"I don't need" is lightyears away from "please do not". I had no idea you viewed that as a request to not post on your talk page, Arcayne. I will consider this. I advise you to be more precise in your phrasing in the future. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup> 14:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
309216 +++$+++ Arcayne +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 309215 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.246485720E09 +++$+++ The edit summary you feel is abrasive was taken almost verbatim from [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:KillerChihuahua&diff=298645492&oldid=298636167 an edit summary of KC's] in response to a post of mine. As for the content of that (or any other posts), I don't believe I've accused KC of being a spammer or a troll. True, she hasn't demonstrated this behavior, but then neither have I. -  +++$+++ ::The edit summary you feel is abrasive was taken almost verbatim from [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KillerChihuahua&diff=298645492&oldid=298636167 an edit summary of KC's] in response to a post of mine. As for the content of that (or any other posts), I don't believe I've accused KC of being a spammer or a troll. True, she hasn't demonstrated this behavior, but then neither have I. - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 15:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
309217 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.246486140E09 +++$+++ <ec> Hi you two, these posts occurred while I was raising the issue on Arcayne's talk page. The phrasing doesn't seem very a very clear way of saying \"please do not\". I'm sure Arcayne will now appreciate that he or she needs to take care not to harass other users, don't know if a detailed response is needed to the vague allegations made by Arcayne on his or her talk page which appear to me to be unsupported by such evidence as has been provided. . .  +++$+++ :<ec> Hi you two, these posts occurred while I was raising the issue on Arcayne's talk page. The phrasing doesn't seem very a very clear way of saying "please do not". I'm sure Arcayne will now appreciate that he or she needs to take care not to harass other users, don't know if a detailed response is needed to the vague allegations made by Arcayne on his or her talk page which appear to me to be unsupported by such evidence as has been provided. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
309218 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.246486140E09 +++$+++ Arcayne, for someone with nothing more to say to KC you've put an awful lot of text down saying nothing. It was your post on her talk page that I thought abrasive, your edit summary is simply misleading. The diff you give from her refers to a clear notice on her talk page, asking to keep conversations in one place. Do carry on here until you feel able to leave the issue alone. .  +++$+++ :Arcayne, for someone with nothing more to say to KC you've put an awful lot of text down saying nothing. It was your post on her talk page that I thought abrasive, your edit summary is simply misleading. The diff you give from her refers to a clear notice on her talk page, asking to keep conversations in one place. Do carry on here until you feel able to leave the issue alone. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
309219 +++$+++ Arcayne +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309208 +++$+++ 309218 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.246506960E09 +++$+++ Oh, I am done with it. The snarky little bit was unnecessary. -  +++$+++ ::Oh, I am done with it. The snarky little bit was unnecessary. - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 20:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

20242 +++$+++ Vmenkov +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-04 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.259926860E09 +++$+++ If the piping \"[[RSFSR|Russian Republic]]\" sounds inappropriate to you for some reason, we could use \"[[History of Soviet Russia and the Soviet Union (1917\u20131927)|the then Russian Republic]]\" (see where the 2 links point).  +++$+++ If the piping "[[RSFSR|Russian Republic]]" sounds inappropriate to you for some reason, we could use "[[History of Soviet Russia and the Soviet Union (1917–1927)|the then Russian Republic]]" (see where the 2 links point). [[User:Vmenkov|Vmenkov]] ([[User talk:Vmenkov|talk]]) 03:41, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
20243 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20242 +++$+++ 20242 +++$+++ 2009-12-04 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.259997240E09 +++$+++ I wrote the article [[Soviet calendar]] within which I mention two similar Time Magazine articles which were also confused. I see that [[User:Arhivarij|Arhivarij]] has modified the previously incorrect Russian Wikipedia article [[:ru:\u0421\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u0440\u0435\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044e\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0440\u044c|\u0421\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u0440\u0435\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044e\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043a\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0440\u044c]] by adding much of the information I found and provided additional valuable information which I should include in the English article. By the way, Roscoe Lamont in [http:\/\/adsabs.harvard.edu\/abs\/1920PA.....28...18L The reform of the Julian calendar] translated Peter the Great's AD 1699 (AM 7208) edict adopting 1 January as New Years Day beginning in 1700. \u2014  +++$+++ :I wrote the article [[Soviet calendar]] within which I mention two similar Time Magazine articles which were also confused. I see that [[User:Arhivarij|Arhivarij]] has modified the previously incorrect Russian Wikipedia article [[:ru:Советский революционный календарь|Советский революционный календарь]] by adding much of the information I found and provided additional valuable information which I should include in the English article. By the way, Roscoe Lamont in [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1920PA.....28...18L The reform of the Julian calendar] translated Peter the Great's AD 1699 (AM 7208) edict adopting 1 January as New Years Day beginning in 1700. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 23:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

20244 +++$+++ Vmenkov +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20244 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-05 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.260006420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reverting and rewriting; I think it looks fine now. I added the full translation of the text to [[:commons:File:Sovnarkom-Gregorian-Calendar-Decree-izo39.jpg]]. As to the May 1918 NYT article, my ''hypothesis'' is that May Day was in fact celebrated in Moscow on May 1, 1918 Gregorian calendar. But by the time the Moscow reporter's report made it to New York, it was already mid May (their earlier  articles of the period complained about telegraph cables being cut in Finland, etc etc), and the NYT editor\/staff writer there just ''assumed'' that the Russians were still on Julian calendar, and wrote the final text accordingly. I am sure they had fact checkers, but those probably weren't very up-to-date...   +++$+++ Thanks for reverting and rewriting; I think it looks fine now. I added the full translation of the text to [[:commons:File:Sovnarkom-Gregorian-Calendar-Decree-izo39.jpg]]. As to the May 1918 NYT article, my ''hypothesis'' is that May Day was in fact celebrated in Moscow on May 1, 1918 Gregorian calendar. But by the time the Moscow reporter's report made it to New York, it was already mid May (their earlier  articles of the period complained about telegraph cables being cut in Finland, etc etc), and the NYT editor/staff writer there just ''assumed'' that the Russians were still on Julian calendar, and wrote the final text accordingly. I am sure they had fact checkers, but those probably weren't very up-to-date...  [[User:Vmenkov|Vmenkov]] ([[User talk:Vmenkov|talk]]) 01:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
20245 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20244 +++$+++ 20244 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.260016380E09 +++$+++ Thanks for translating the Pravda article, which I have tweaked slightly. In [[Soviet calendar]], Shilova (2007) and Malevsky-Malevitch (1933) disagree on whether International Worker's Day and the Day of the Proletarian Revolution was one or two days from 1917 to 1929. Of course, both may have been celebrated for two days but they may have had different kinds of celebrations on those days, which I also read was the case for the post-1929 21\u201322 January. My specific concern is whether one or both days were days of rest. Another possibility is that they were originally only one day of rest and were expanded to two days sometime between 1917 and 1929. Could you cast a deciding vote and provide an additonal reference? \u2014  +++$+++ :Thanks for translating the Pravda article, which I have tweaked slightly. In [[Soviet calendar]], Shilova (2007) and Malevsky-Malevitch (1933) disagree on whether International Worker's Day and the Day of the Proletarian Revolution was one or two days from 1917 to 1929. Of course, both may have been celebrated for two days but they may have had different kinds of celebrations on those days, which I also read was the case for the post-1929 21–22 January. My specific concern is whether one or both days were days of rest. Another possibility is that they were originally only one day of rest and were expanded to two days sometime between 1917 and 1929. Could you cast a deciding vote and provide an additonal reference? — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 04:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
20246 +++$+++ Vmenkov +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20244 +++$+++ 20245 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.260030180E09 +++$+++ I've expanded that article a bit, based on the meticulously written [[:ru:\u0418\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0434\u043d\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432 \u0420\u043e\u0441\u0441\u0438\u0438]] (History of public holidays in Russia) and sources therein. It appears that May 2 and Nov 8 were indeed designated (national) public holidays only in 1928. But, as the write-up in that Russian article and the chart from it (see above) indicate, the full story is rather complicated, and I certainly won't have time and patience trying to write it up. The situation is complicated by the existence, until 1929, of up to 10 \"special\" holidays - additional public holidays (however, ''unpaid'') which local governments were authorized to set. Those could be used both to extend the \"May Holidays\" and \"November Holidays\" into May 2 and Nov 8, and to provide workers with days off for major religious feasts.  +++$+++ :: I've expanded that article a bit, based on the meticulously written [[:ru:История праздников России]] (History of public holidays in Russia) and sources therein. It appears that May 2 and Nov 8 were indeed designated (national) public holidays only in 1928. But, as the write-up in that Russian article and the chart from it (see above) indicate, the full story is rather complicated, and I certainly won't have time and patience trying to write it up. The situation is complicated by the existence, until 1929, of up to 10 "special" holidays - additional public holidays (however, ''unpaid'') which local governments were authorized to set. Those could be used both to extend the "May Holidays" and "November Holidays" into May 2 and Nov 8, and to provide workers with days off for major religious feasts. [[User:Vmenkov|Vmenkov]] ([[User talk:Vmenkov|talk]]) 08:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

265518 +++$+++ Timmy12 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265518 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-25 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.161817920E09 +++$+++ I would like to add stuff of yours also, since they consider us the same person and when they harass one of us, they think they are harassing the other. (It's incredible the energy they have put into this!) It's very hard gathering all the evidence. Let me know of any I don't know about.    +++$+++ I would like to add stuff of yours also, since they consider us the same person and when they harass one of us, they think they are harassing the other. (It's incredible the energy they have put into this!) It's very hard gathering all the evidence. Let me know of any I don't know about.   [[User:Timmy12|Timmy12]] 16:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
265519 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265518 +++$+++ 265518 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.161851400E09 +++$+++ Except that Mattisse was the one to ''insist'' on the citations. And I can document that. She did it with multiple socks, too. &mdash; +++$+++ :Except that Mattisse was the one to ''insist'' on the citations. And I can document that. She did it with multiple socks, too. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 01:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
265520 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265518 +++$+++ 265519 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.161851820E09 +++$+++ Mo, you and your sockpuppet are the ones that ruin wikipedia. Don't worry, you are about to get caught. &mdash; +++$+++ ::Mo, you and your sockpuppet are the ones that ruin wikipedia. Don't worry, you are about to get caught. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 01:37, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
265521 +++$+++ Metros232 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265518 +++$+++ 265518 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.161851940E09 +++$+++ I'm a little confused...why is Mattisse adding comments of Calton as if they are her own? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=83757735&oldid=83745259]  +++$+++ :I'm a little confused...why is Mattisse adding comments of Calton as if they are her own? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=83757735&oldid=83745259] [[User:Metros232|Metros232]] 01:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
265522 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265518 +++$+++ 265521 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 01:41:00 +++$+++ 1.161852060E09 +++$+++ Both [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] and [[User:Timmy12|Timmy12]] do that. They copy from other users talk pages, admin discussions, and put it on their talk pages on private pages. See Timmy's user page for example. Many links to material copied from other pages. &mdash; +++$+++ ::Both [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]] and [[User:Timmy12|Timmy12]] do that. They copy from other users talk pages, admin discussions, and put it on their talk pages on private pages. See Timmy's user page for example. Many links to material copied from other pages. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 01:41, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

544536 +++$+++ Peter morrell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544536 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-23 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.193199720E09 +++$+++ A reply would be nice!  +++$+++ A reply would be nice! [[User talk:Peter morrell|Peter morrell]] 21:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
544537 +++$+++ Peter morrell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544536 +++$+++ 544536 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.193200500E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Tim, no probs; oh, its been saying that all day! hrumph! cheers  +++$+++ :Thanks, Tim, no probs; oh, its been saying that all day! hrumph! cheers [[User talk:Peter morrell|Peter morrell]] 21:35, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

20249 +++$+++ Terry0051 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20249 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-24 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.264329240E09 +++$+++ Certainly the work is out of copyright, and some of the neighboring volumes in the series are visible on archive.org (and I don't have trouble with other books on google generally).  I wonder if you know of any way, or could suggest any way, that I could get to see the downloaded pdf of Newcomb vol.6?  +++$+++ Certainly the work is out of copyright, and some of the neighboring volumes in the series are visible on archive.org (and I don't have trouble with other books on google generally).  I wonder if you know of any way, or could suggest any way, that I could get to see the downloaded pdf of Newcomb vol.6? [[User:Terry0051|Terry0051]] ([[User talk:Terry0051|talk]]) 02:34, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
20250 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20249 +++$+++ 20249 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.264349520E09 +++$+++ You may be a victim of Google books selective geographic availability. Some books which Google uploads, even those in the public domain, are only available to United States users or may only be available to United Kingdom users, etc. I found two editions of volume 6 on my United States English Google books site, [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=j8MRAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover] and [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=MRAJAQAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover]. If that is not the problem, you might try another Google books site. Just change the language code in http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?hl=en I have found books written in Latin on the Russian Google books site that were not even listed on the English Google books site. I just checked the Russian site (hl=ru) and the same two 1898 editions are listed for \"other editions\" (\u0414\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0435 \u0438\u0437\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f) of \"astronomical papers prepared for the use of the american ephemeris and nautical almanac\". \"Other editions\" is usually the last link under any edition that is listed under a specific title. \u2014  +++$+++ :You may be a victim of Google books selective geographic availability. Some books which Google uploads, even those in the public domain, are only available to United States users or may only be available to United Kingdom users, etc. I found two editions of volume 6 on my United States English Google books site, [http://books.google.com/books?id=j8MRAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover] and [http://books.google.com/books?id=MRAJAQAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover]. If that is not the problem, you might try another Google books site. Just change the language code in http://books.google.com/books?hl=en I have found books written in Latin on the Russian Google books site that were not even listed on the English Google books site. I just checked the Russian site (hl=ru) and the same two 1898 editions are listed for "other editions" (Другие издания) of "astronomical papers prepared for the use of the american ephemeris and nautical almanac". "Other editions" is usually the last link under any edition that is listed under a specific title. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 08:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

544538 +++$+++ WAS 4.250 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-22 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.193097360E09 +++$+++ Could you add \"[[:Category:Main Page]]\" to the bottom of http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Main_Page? I recently discovered http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Main_Page_alternatives which can be found through [[:Category:Main Page]]. I tried it in a sandbox, and it works fine there. I asked about it on the main page talk page and was ignored.  +++$+++ Could you add "[[:Category:Main Page]]" to the bottom of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page? I recently discovered http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Main_Page_alternatives which can be found through [[:Category:Main Page]]. I tried it in a sandbox, and it works fine there. I asked about it on the main page talk page and was ignored. [[User:WAS 4.250|WAS 4.250]] 16:56, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
544539 +++$+++ WAS 4.250 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544538 +++$+++ 544538 +++$+++ 2007-10-23 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.193185320E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:WAS 4.250|WAS 4.250]] 17:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

20251 +++$+++ Terry0051 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20251 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-24 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.264387200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the information. I didn't know about selective geographic availability, and it looks as if you're right. I tried all the links and parameters you suggested, with negative result. I'm in the UK.  Maybe someone at Google checked the wrong box and accidentally switched off availability here. I guess I'll have to try and see if there's any way I can get to see a download made from where it is available.  +++$+++ Thanks for the information. I didn't know about selective geographic availability, and it looks as if you're right. I tried all the links and parameters you suggested, with negative result. I'm in the UK.  Maybe someone at Google checked the wrong box and accidentally switched off availability here. I guess I'll have to try and see if there's any way I can get to see a download made from where it is available. [[User:Terry0051|Terry0051]] ([[User talk:Terry0051|talk]]) 18:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
20252 +++$+++ Jc3s5h +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20251 +++$+++ 20251 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.264392360E09 +++$+++ Two comments that do not bear exactly on accessing this data. (1) It is probable that this work was never under copyright, because by law, writing created by US federal employees in the course of their duties is in the public domain. (2) Google books seem to have a rough time classifying old astronomy books; I have seen several classified as juvenile non-fiction (or maybe it was juvenile fiction). -- +++$+++ :Two comments that do not bear exactly on accessing this data. (1) It is probable that this work was never under copyright, because by law, writing created by US federal employees in the course of their duties is in the public domain. (2) Google books seem to have a rough time classifying old astronomy books; I have seen several classified as juvenile non-fiction (or maybe it was juvenile fiction). --[[User:Jc3s5h|Jc3s5h]] ([[User talk:Jc3s5h|talk]]) 20:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
20253 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20251 +++$+++ 20252 +++$+++ 2010-01-24 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.264403280E09 +++$+++ I learned about selective geographic availability from complaints to [http:\/\/www.astro.uni-bonn.de\/~pbrosche\/hist_astr\/ha-hastro-l.html HASTRO-L, The History of Astronomy Discussion Group]. Some readers were searching for astronomical articles published in the 1950s which were avaiable online to US readers but not to European readers. This problem is not limited to astronomy books. I discovered that Google books had a very hard to find book on calculating the date of Easter while searching for something else, ''[http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=qbA-rzFsIoMC&printsec=frontcover The ecclesiastical calendar: Its theory and construction]'' by Samuel Butcher (1877). I mentioned it to an anonymous editor on [[Talk:Computus]], but he could not access its image via Google, nor via the link to Google books provided by the [http:\/\/www.archive.org\/details\/texts Internet Archive], even though it was published in London, not the US (he did not reveal his country). He was able to access the corrupt text provided by the Internet Archive. I just checked the [https:\/\/openaccess.leidenuniv.nl\/ University of Leiden] and [http:\/\/gallica.bnf.fr\/ Gallica, Bibliotheque nationale de France], but neither had this series, which is not surprising since most of their books and articles are European. As far as I can see, virtually all astronomy books on Google are classified as juvenile nonfiction, so I pay no attention to that. \u2014  +++$+++ ::I learned about selective geographic availability from complaints to [http://www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~pbrosche/hist_astr/ha-hastro-l.html HASTRO-L, The History of Astronomy Discussion Group]. Some readers were searching for astronomical articles published in the 1950s which were avaiable online to US readers but not to European readers. This problem is not limited to astronomy books. I discovered that Google books had a very hard to find book on calculating the date of Easter while searching for something else, ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=qbA-rzFsIoMC&printsec=frontcover The ecclesiastical calendar: Its theory and construction]'' by Samuel Butcher (1877). I mentioned it to an anonymous editor on [[Talk:Computus]], but he could not access its image via Google, nor via the link to Google books provided by the [http://www.archive.org/details/texts Internet Archive], even though it was published in London, not the US (he did not reveal his country). He was able to access the corrupt text provided by the Internet Archive. I just checked the [https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/ University of Leiden] and [http://gallica.bnf.fr/ Gallica, Bibliotheque nationale de France], but neither had this series, which is not surprising since most of their books and articles are European. As far as I can see, virtually all astronomy books on Google are classified as juvenile nonfiction, so I pay no attention to that. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 23:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

544541 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-10 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.192004640E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Complex II.svg|All]] [[:Image:Complex IV.svg|done]], sir :) Took me a while, I know\u2014I hope they're accurate!  +++$+++ [[:Image:Complex II.svg|All]] [[:Image:Complex IV.svg|done]], sir :) Took me a while, I know—I hope they're accurate! [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 01:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
544542 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544541 +++$+++ 544541 +++$+++ 2007-10-10 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.192056420E09 +++$+++ No, I just redo them from scratch using the PNG as a basis. There are automated \"tracing\" utilities, even in Inkscape, but the results are awful. It's no bother at all, though; the worst part is my taking so long :)  +++$+++ :No, I just redo them from scratch using the PNG as a basis. There are automated "tracing" utilities, even in Inkscape, but the results are awful. It's no bother at all, though; the worst part is my taking so long :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 15:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
544543 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544541 +++$+++ 544542 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.193285160E09 +++$+++ Welcome :) I completely forgot to add them to the article when they were done. I only noticed because I was updating my gallery at Commons.  +++$+++ ::Welcome :) I completely forgot to add them to the article when they were done. I only noticed because I was updating my gallery at Commons. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 21:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

20254 +++$+++ LenderCarl +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-10 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.265840700E09 +++$+++ Greetings from saxnia +++$+++ Greetings from saxnia[[User:LenderCarl|LenderCarl]] ([[User talk:LenderCarl|talk]]) 14:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
20255 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20254 +++$+++ 20254 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.265861640E09 +++$+++ Vielen Dank, aber ich habe schon gelesen das auf [[User talk:Jc3s5h#perpedual calendar]]. Ich verstehe, dass Ihr ewiger Kalender, oder etwas ganz \xc4hnliches, die bisher ver\xf6ffentlicht wurde. Das verst\xe4rkt nur Ihr Urheberrecht. Aber man kann nicht behalten ein Urheberrecht f\xfcr jedes Bild, die Sie auf Wikimedia Commons. Sie m\xfcssen das Verlagsrecht-Symbol zu entfernen \"( C )\" aus dem Bild oder das gesamte Bild gel\xf6scht werden k\xf6nnen. Ich wiederhole dies mit [http:\/\/translate.google.com\/?hl=de&tab=wT# Google \xfcbersetzer]. \u2014  +++$+++ :Vielen Dank, aber ich habe schon gelesen das auf [[User talk:Jc3s5h#perpedual calendar]]. Ich verstehe, dass Ihr ewiger Kalender, oder etwas ganz Ähnliches, die bisher veröffentlicht wurde. Das verstärkt nur Ihr Urheberrecht. Aber man kann nicht behalten ein Urheberrecht für jedes Bild, die Sie auf Wikimedia Commons. Sie müssen das Verlagsrecht-Symbol zu entfernen "( C )" aus dem Bild oder das gesamte Bild gelöscht werden können. Ich wiederhole dies mit [http://translate.google.com/?hl=de&tab=wT# Google übersetzer]. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 20:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
20256 +++$+++ Jc3s5h +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20254 +++$+++ 20255 +++$+++ 2010-02-10 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.265862420E09 +++$+++ Joe, I believe that is incorrect. The terms of the [[Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License]], for example, contains the phrase \"Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, '''non-exclusive''' perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright) license...\" (emphasis added). ''Non-exclusive'' means that the licensor retains the copyright, and is free to grant additional licenses to others, or under other terms.  +++$+++ ::Joe, I believe that is incorrect. The terms of the [[Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License]], for example, contains the phrase "Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, '''non-exclusive''' perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright) license..." (emphasis added). ''Non-exclusive'' means that the licensor retains the copyright, and is free to grant additional licenses to others, or under other terms. [[User:Jc3s5h|Jc3s5h]] ([[User talk:Jc3s5h|talk]]) 20:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
20257 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20254 +++$+++ 20254 +++$+++ 2010-02-14 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.266213960E09 +++$+++ Upon further consideration, you're probably right. The [[Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works|Berne Convention]], now accepted by the United States, does not require any copyright symbol, in contrast with former United States copyright law, which did. That is, a copyright under the Berne Convention is automatic (no symbol), whereas former US law required both registration in the [[Library of Congress]] and a distinct copyright symbol. Thus the presence of a copyright symbol does not affect the copyright status of the work. I was thinking in terms of the old law rather than current law. \u2014  +++$+++ :Upon further consideration, you're probably right. The [[Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works|Berne Convention]], now accepted by the United States, does not require any copyright symbol, in contrast with former United States copyright law, which did. That is, a copyright under the Berne Convention is automatic (no symbol), whereas former US law required both registration in the [[Library of Congress]] and a distinct copyright symbol. Thus the presence of a copyright symbol does not affect the copyright status of the work. I was thinking in terms of the old law rather than current law. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 22:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

615045 +++$+++ Arunreginald +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615045 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-29 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.212074220E09 +++$+++ [[User talk:Arunreginald\/Archives\/2008\/July#Battle of Yarmouk|Read my reply]] on my talk page. Cheers. <span style=\"color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;\">Arun Reginald<\/span> ( +++$+++ [[User talk:Arunreginald/Archives/2008/July#Battle of Yarmouk|Read my reply]] on my talk page. Cheers. <span style="color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;">Arun Reginald</span> ([[User talk:Arunreginald|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Arunreginald|contribs]]) 08:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
615046 +++$+++ Arunreginald +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615045 +++$+++ 615045 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.212338520E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Battle of Yarmuk Terrain.svg|right|100px]]I am in the process of making a 3D map for the battle. But in the meantime please do not revert my edits. The relationship between Umar and Khalid becomes a key point at the end of the battle. I am adding these details because I want the article to reach a Good Article status myself and, inshallah, a featured article. I have almost all the sources at hand with me and have somehow got my hands on al-Tabari and Michael the Syrian at a library here in Oxford. So the edits are merely promising. Please bear with me. Cheers. <span style=\"color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;\">Arun Reginald<\/span> ( +++$+++ : [[Image:Battle of Yarmuk Terrain.svg|right|100px]]I am in the process of making a 3D map for the battle. But in the meantime please do not revert my edits. The relationship between Umar and Khalid becomes a key point at the end of the battle. I am adding these details because I want the article to reach a Good Article status myself and, inshallah, a featured article. I have almost all the sources at hand with me and have somehow got my hands on al-Tabari and Michael the Syrian at a library here in Oxford. So the edits are merely promising. Please bear with me. Cheers. <span style="color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;">Arun Reginald</span> ([[User talk:Arunreginald|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Arunreginald|contribs]]) 09:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
615047 +++$+++ Arunreginald +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615045 +++$+++ 615046 +++$+++ 2008-06-01 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.212340740E09 +++$+++ Also note the fact that Vahan is an [http:\/\/www.behindthename.com\/name\/vahan actual Armenian word]. Please debate because I will change Mahan to Vahanin days to come. <span style=\"color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;\">Arun Reginald<\/span> ( +++$+++ ::Also note the fact that Vahan is an [http://www.behindthename.com/name/vahan actual Armenian word]. Please debate because I will change Mahan to Vahanin days to come. <span style="color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;">Arun Reginald</span> ([[User talk:Arunreginald|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Arunreginald|contribs]]) 10:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
615048 +++$+++ Arunreginald +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615045 +++$+++ 615047 +++$+++ 2008-06-02 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.212473220E09 +++$+++ I have made the latest map, please check it [[:Image:Battle of Yarmuk Terrain.svg|here]]. <span style=\"color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;\">Arun Reginald<\/span> ( +++$+++ ::: I have made the latest map, please check it [[:Image:Battle of Yarmuk Terrain.svg|here]]. <span style="color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;">Arun Reginald</span> ([[User talk:Arunreginald|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Arunreginald|contribs]]) 23:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
615049 +++$+++ Arunreginald +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615045 +++$+++ 615048 +++$+++ 2008-06-03 08:02:00 +++$+++ 1.212505320E09 +++$+++ SVG has its own limitations. The map that you see is accurate to the finest detail. The map has the most accurate scale as I picked it off from Live maps in 3D view. What would be helpful is if you could provide me with the maps Nicolle drew in his book. Yes, I became aware that the camps might be placed wrongly but do assist me on that. Still don't understand why I need a sandbox :) Cheers. <span style=\"color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;\">Arun Reginald<\/span> ( +++$+++ :::: SVG has its own limitations. The map that you see is accurate to the finest detail. The map has the most accurate scale as I picked it off from Live maps in 3D view. What would be helpful is if you could provide me with the maps Nicolle drew in his book. Yes, I became aware that the camps might be placed wrongly but do assist me on that. Still don't understand why I need a sandbox :) Cheers. <span style="color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;">Arun Reginald</span> ([[User talk:Arunreginald|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Arunreginald|contribs]]) 08:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
615050 +++$+++ Arunreginald +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615045 +++$+++ 615049 +++$+++ 2008-06-03 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.212506220E09 +++$+++ Before I forget I must tell you one thing. It says in Michael the Syrian that the Wadi Allan and the Wadi Ruqqad at water flowing at the rate I showed. And another thing, because the map is 3D, it is lying down on the incline. So the area at the top corner is further than it seems. Check [http:\/\/maps.live.com\/default.aspx?v=2&FORM=LMLTCP&cp=32.757524~35.798895&style=h&lvl=15&tilt=-39.0751137965072&dir=1.14504623369392&alt=3210.3039307436&cam=32.722354~35.798063&scene=-1&phx=0&phy=0&phscl=1&encType=1 this] out.<span style=\"color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;\">Arun Reginald<\/span> ( +++$+++ :::::Before I forget I must tell you one thing. It says in Michael the Syrian that the Wadi Allan and the Wadi Ruqqad at water flowing at the rate I showed. And another thing, because the map is 3D, it is lying down on the incline. So the area at the top corner is further than it seems. Check [http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&FORM=LMLTCP&cp=32.757524~35.798895&style=h&lvl=15&tilt=-39.0751137965072&dir=1.14504623369392&alt=3210.3039307436&cam=32.722354~35.798063&scene=-1&phx=0&phy=0&phscl=1&encType=1 this] out.<span style="color:steelblue;border-bottom:1px solid green;">Arun Reginald</span> ([[User talk:Arunreginald|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Arunreginald|contribs]]) 08:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

544544 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-23 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.193202000E09 +++$+++ I support you on the units issue, although you might want to introduce the words \"most common units in the relevant scientific literature\".  Unfortunately, I have to dash off to my adult-education class, so I can't anything to the debate  just now.  But something nicer is in the works, ''un petit cadeau'' mainly with you in mind.  Please check out Daisy's work on [[4-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase]] and let me know what you think.  We've been gone too long from the [[WP:MCB|MCB community]] and I thought this might be a nice ''revenir'' and ''souvenir''.   Ta-ta, and wish me luck \u2014 I have a test tonight! :(  +++$+++ I support you on the units issue, although you might want to introduce the words "most common units in the relevant scientific literature".  Unfortunately, I have to dash off to my adult-education class, so I can't anything to the debate  just now.  But something nicer is in the works, ''un petit cadeau'' mainly with you in mind.  Please check out Daisy's work on [[4-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase]] and let me know what you think.  We've been gone too long from the [[WP:MCB|MCB community]] and I thought this might be a nice ''revenir'' and ''souvenir''.   Ta-ta, and wish me luck — I have a test tonight! :( [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 22:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
544545 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544544 +++$+++ 544544 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.193295120E09 +++$+++ Soooo \u2014 I guessed that [[:Category:EC 1.1.1|this]] was your favorite class of enzymes?  It does make for a good beginning, so that we can get our bearings and think about how to improve such articles.  Daisy is eager for suggestions from everyone at the [[WP:MCB]].  I'm going to try to finish them tonight, but I'm leaving tomorrow morning to visit my sister, and won't be back until next week. I still have to pack as well!  :(  Hoping that you like your oxidoreductases, however many there are,  +++$+++ :Soooo — I guessed that [[:Category:EC 1.1.1|this]] was your favorite class of enzymes?  It does make for a good beginning, so that we can get our bearings and think about how to improve such articles.  Daisy is eager for suggestions from everyone at the [[WP:MCB]].  I'm going to try to finish them tonight, but I'm leaving tomorrow morning to visit my sister, and won't be back until next week. I still have to pack as well!  :(  Hoping that you like your oxidoreductases, however many there are, [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 23:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
544546 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544544 +++$+++ 544544 +++$+++ 2007-10-24 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.193295420E09 +++$+++ PS. You might want to move one or two articles to a simpler name, or maybe connect it by redirects to an existing article that I missed or to a redlink such as those on [[List of EC numbers (EC_1)]].  I wasn't always sure which name to choose; some of them seem overly complicated and others overly simple. It was a hard balance to strike.  Also, my wikilinks to metabolic pathways seem to need work. :(  +++$+++ :PS. You might want to move one or two articles to a simpler name, or maybe connect it by redirects to an existing article that I missed or to a redlink such as those on [[List of EC numbers (EC_1)]].  I wasn't always sure which name to choose; some of them seem overly complicated and others overly simple. It was a hard balance to strike.  Also, my wikilinks to metabolic pathways seem to need work. :( [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 23:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

282405 +++$+++ Joowwww +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282405 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-06 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.218057060E09 +++$+++ See [[Talk:Tibet]] for details on the Wikipedia policy regarding citation of all statements. -- +++$+++ See [[Talk:Tibet]] for details on the Wikipedia policy regarding citation of all statements. --[[User:Joowwww|Joowwww]] ([[User talk:Joowwww|talk]]) 14:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
282406 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282405 +++$+++ 282405 +++$+++ 2008-08-06 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.218091500E09 +++$+++ Dear Joowwww: I certainly don't want to start and edit war with you - so I will add a reference as you requested. It does seem to me, however, unnecessary here as I don't think anyone, even the most ardent PRC supporter, would try to argue that Tibet has never been an independent kingdom. This is a completely untenable position considering the many wars between Tibet and China and the fact that at one point Tibet actually captured the Chinese capital of Chang'an. Anyway - enough time wasted on this  - please see the reference I have added. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Dear Joowwww: I certainly don't want to start and edit war with you - so I will add a reference as you requested. It does seem to me, however, unnecessary here as I don't think anyone, even the most ardent PRC supporter, would try to argue that Tibet has never been an independent kingdom. This is a completely untenable position considering the many wars between Tibet and China and the fact that at one point Tibet actually captured the Chinese capital of Chang'an. Anyway - enough time wasted on this  - please see the reference I have added. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill|talk]]) 23:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

544550 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-27 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.193540520E09 +++$+++ Is AS still on your watchlist?   +++$+++ Is AS still on your watchlist?  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
544551 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544550 +++$+++ 544550 +++$+++ 2007-10-27 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.193544240E09 +++$+++ Same ole, same ole, allegations of POV still.  I thought [[WP:NPOV#Undue]] was understood last time around.  +++$+++ :Same ole, same ole, allegations of POV still.  I thought [[WP:NPOV#Undue]] was understood last time around. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

20263 +++$+++ Barefact +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20263 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-08 08:59:00 +++$+++ 1.278604740E09 +++$+++ Joe Kress, that was precisely my point, there were a number of people between India and Mongolia that were dropped by limiting the eastern extent to India. Maybe you can come up with a better phrasing to make it clear that various people between India and Mongolia keep informally using the Chinese calendar up to the present. Thanks,  +++$+++ Joe Kress, that was precisely my point, there were a number of people between India and Mongolia that were dropped by limiting the eastern extent to India. Maybe you can come up with a better phrasing to make it clear that various people between India and Mongolia keep informally using the Chinese calendar up to the present. Thanks, [[User:Barefact|Barefact]] ([[User talk:Barefact|talk]]) 08:59, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
20264 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20263 +++$+++ 20263 +++$+++ 2010-07-11 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.278851820E09 +++$+++ I'm compromising by including both \"India and Mongolia\". \u2014  +++$+++ :I'm compromising by including both "India and Mongolia". — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress#top|talk]]) 05:37, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

544552 +++$+++ David.Mestel +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544552 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-29 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.193710740E09 +++$+++ On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, [[User:David.Mestel|David Mestel]]<sup>([[User Talk:David.Mestel|Talk]])<\/sup> 19:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)  +++$+++ On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, [[User:David.Mestel|David Mestel]]<sup>([[User Talk:David.Mestel|Talk]])</sup> 19:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC) [[User:David.Mestel|David Mestel]]<sup>([[User Talk:David.Mestel|Talk]])</sup> 19:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
544553 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544552 +++$+++ 544552 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.193809260E09 +++$+++ Just a quick head's up - you've mis-spelt Sadi Carnot as Saudi Carnot in your [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Sadi Carnot\/Evidence#Evidence presented by TimVickers|evidence section]] (x6).  +++$+++ :Just a quick head's up - you've mis-spelt Sadi Carnot as Saudi Carnot in your [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sadi Carnot/Evidence#Evidence presented by TimVickers|evidence section]] (x6). [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] 22:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
544554 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544552 +++$+++ 544553 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.193810280E09 +++$+++ Oops!   +++$+++ ::Oops!  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

282409 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-11 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.218501060E09 +++$+++ Hi John. Its odd but somebody [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Blofeld_of_SPECTRE&diff=prev&oldid=231039741 vandalised my user page] as if I was the Dalai Lama himself. Yet another PRC basher do you think?  +++$+++ Hi John. Its odd but somebody [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Blofeld_of_SPECTRE&diff=prev&oldid=231039741 vandalised my user page] as if I was the Dalai Lama himself. Yet another PRC basher do you think? [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:navy;">'''''♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Navy">'''"Talk"?'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 17:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
282410 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282409 +++$+++ 282409 +++$+++ 2008-08-11 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.218515760E09 +++$+++ Hi Ernst! Sorry you are experiencing such nastiness. It is really impossible to say who is behind such attacks. On the surface it looks like it is a fervent supporter of the PRC - but nobody can tell for sure. All I can find out is that the message originated from a computer in St. Louis in the U.S. Try not to take it too seriously - I have had much more threatening letters than this. All the best - my warm thoughts are with you.  +++$+++ :Hi Ernst! Sorry you are experiencing such nastiness. It is really impossible to say who is behind such attacks. On the surface it looks like it is a fervent supporter of the PRC - but nobody can tell for sure. All I can find out is that the message originated from a computer in St. Louis in the U.S. Try not to take it too seriously - I have had much more threatening letters than this. All the best - my warm thoughts are with you. [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 21:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

282411 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-11 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.218516300E09 +++$+++ Interesting. Oh I'm not taking it seriously, could have been far worse. Seems strange though that the editor attacked my User page though as if I was the head of the Tibetan Independence cause. Hey have a look at [[Drukair]] developed by User:Russavia. I started [[Tourism in Bhutan]] yesterday and was glad to find out the government strictly regulates it to high class tourism to protect the landscape and heritage. Love Nepal too, I saw a documentary last night about a Nepali tribe and [[honey hunting]] in the Himilayan foothills -fascinating stuff -involved climbing up a 200ft rope ladder and using long poles to chisel off te honeycombs with around 2million bees in them, twice the size of those in the UK -their body mass is important to protect against the cold and altitude. I've found a site which lists basic data on population and demographics on all the villages in the country so soon enough I'll get the Nepal places onto wikipedia. Its a shame there isn't more available to expand our Tibetan geo articles! Regards +++$+++ Interesting. Oh I'm not taking it seriously, could have been far worse. Seems strange though that the editor attacked my User page though as if I was the head of the Tibetan Independence cause. Hey have a look at [[Drukair]] developed by User:Russavia. I started [[Tourism in Bhutan]] yesterday and was glad to find out the government strictly regulates it to high class tourism to protect the landscape and heritage. Love Nepal too, I saw a documentary last night about a Nepali tribe and [[honey hunting]] in the Himilayan foothills -fascinating stuff -involved climbing up a 200ft rope ladder and using long poles to chisel off te honeycombs with around 2million bees in them, twice the size of those in the UK -their body mass is important to protect against the cold and altitude. I've found a site which lists basic data on population and demographics on all the villages in the country so soon enough I'll get the Nepal places onto wikipedia. Its a shame there isn't more available to expand our Tibetan geo articles! Regards[[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:navy;">'''''♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Navy">'''"Talk"?'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 21:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
282412 +++$+++ Invertzoo +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282411 +++$+++ 282411 +++$+++ 2008-08-15 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.218786180E09 +++$+++ Hi John Hill, nice to meet you. Yes, I certainly do need help with in-line citations, and I would be absolutely delighted if you can help me learn what is the easiest way to do them. I will \"talk\" to you more tomorrow.  +++$+++ :Hi John Hill, nice to meet you. Yes, I certainly do need help with in-line citations, and I would be absolutely delighted if you can help me learn what is the easiest way to do them. I will "talk" to you more tomorrow. [[User:Invertzoo|Invertzoo]] ([[User talk:Invertzoo#top|talk]]) 00:43, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
282413 +++$+++ Invertzoo +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282411 +++$+++ 282411 +++$+++ 2008-08-15 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.218831120E09 +++$+++ For example, just now I checked the \"Rosetta Stone\" mention using a Google search, and I did find a site that has the Greek translation of the RS with \"byssus cloth\" in it. For now I just marked the mention in the article with a link to the site, which is not the proper way to do this, but is easy for me to do for the meantime. If you want to turn that into a proper ref please just go ahead. Maybe that will show me how to do a website footnote, which I guess is different from a book footnote.  +++$+++ :For example, just now I checked the "Rosetta Stone" mention using a Google search, and I did find a site that has the Greek translation of the RS with "byssus cloth" in it. For now I just marked the mention in the article with a link to the site, which is not the proper way to do this, but is easy for me to do for the meantime. If you want to turn that into a proper ref please just go ahead. Maybe that will show me how to do a website footnote, which I guess is different from a book footnote. [[User:Invertzoo|Invertzoo]] ([[User talk:Invertzoo|talk]]) 13:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
282414 +++$+++ Invertzoo +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282411 +++$+++ 282411 +++$+++ 2008-08-15 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.218831120E09 +++$+++ It would be helpful to me if you could reply to this on my talk page, thanks.  +++$+++ :It would be helpful to me if you could reply to this on my talk page, thanks. [[User:Invertzoo|Invertzoo]] ([[User talk:Invertzoo|talk]]) 13:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

544556 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544556 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-01 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.193983920E09 +++$+++ One problem we're having is how to make the first letter of the article title lowercase \u2014 do you know how to do that?  It's rather annoying to have [[rRNA (guanine-N2-)-methyltransferase]] come out as [[RRNA (guanine-N2-)-methyltransferase]], don't you think?  Bleah :p  Thanks for any help or insights in advance! :)   +++$+++ One problem we're having is how to make the first letter of the article title lowercase — do you know how to do that?  It's rather annoying to have [[rRNA (guanine-N2-)-methyltransferase]] come out as [[RRNA (guanine-N2-)-methyltransferase]], don't you think?  Bleah :p  Thanks for any help or insights in advance! :)  [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 23:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
544557 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544556 +++$+++ 544556 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 21:11:00 +++$+++ 1.194063060E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for the {{tl|lowercase}} link to get the various RNA enzymes OK! :)  I've started back in on the oxidoreductases today, as you can see.  Do you think I should finish them off first before moving on to the other fives groups of enzymes (transferases, isomerases, etc.), or do you think I should do a smattering from each category and then gradually fill them in?  It probably doesn't matter, but I was just curious whether you had any opinion, any pre-vision or foretelling from your dreams ;)  +++$+++ :Thanks very much for the {{tl|lowercase}} link to get the various RNA enzymes OK! :)  I've started back in on the oxidoreductases today, as you can see.  Do you think I should finish them off first before moving on to the other fives groups of enzymes (transferases, isomerases, etc.), or do you think I should do a smattering from each category and then gradually fill them in?  It probably doesn't matter, but I was just curious whether you had any opinion, any pre-vision or foretelling from your dreams ;) [[User:WillowW|Willow]] 21:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

282415 +++$+++ Anonymous44 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282415 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-15 12:47:00 +++$+++ 1.218829620E09 +++$+++ what exactly did you mean by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Elamite_language&diff=61178197&oldid=60317608 this]? -- +++$+++ what exactly did you mean by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elamite_language&diff=61178197&oldid=60317608 this]? --[[User:Anonymous44|Anonymous44]] ([[User talk:Anonymous44|talk]]) 12:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
282416 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282415 +++$+++ 282415 +++$+++ 2008-08-15 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.218866100E09 +++$+++ Ilamid is meant to begin with a capital \"i\" - not a capital \"l\" - the font used in the Wikipedia is, indeed, very confusing and should be changed so that capital forms of the letters can be easily distinguished from each other. \"Ilamid\" is a reasonably common alternative way of writing \"Elamite.\" See, for example, [http:\/\/www.iran-daily.com\/1384\/2399\/html\/art.htm] or [http:\/\/www.chnpress.com\/news\/?id=462&section=2]. Hope that clears up any confusion. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Ilamid is meant to begin with a capital "i" - not a capital "l" - the font used in the Wikipedia is, indeed, very confusing and should be changed so that capital forms of the letters can be easily distinguished from each other. "Ilamid" is a reasonably common alternative way of writing "Elamite." See, for example, [http://www.iran-daily.com/1384/2399/html/art.htm] or [http://www.chnpress.com/news/?id=462&section=2]. Hope that clears up any confusion. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
282417 +++$+++ Anonymous44 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282415 +++$+++ 282416 +++$+++ 2008-08-16 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.218871440E09 +++$+++ Thanks, it makes more sense now (I had been wondering at first if a connection might be implied with Llamas or even Tibetan Lamas in some way :)), although I wonder how you came to encounter this version of the name in the first place. It's not really that common at all in my experience. Judging from the links you provided and other searches, \"Ilamids\" seems to be used in English by a few Iranian websites, for unclear reasons - perhaps they're using the Farsi (oops, Persian) form as a way of claiming their cultural heritage? A search for \"Ilamids\", \"Ilamid language\", as compared with \"Elamites\", \"Elamite language\", on either Google or Google books shows that \"Ilamid\" (apart from the names of some unrelated Muslim sultans) practically doesn't exist. (This includes the researcher cited by the Iranian news, who uses \"Elamite\" in his own writings [http:\/\/www.achemenet.com\/pdf\/nabu\/nabu1999-052.pdf]). A look-up in an English dictionary or encyclopedia also shows that \"Ilamid\" is not an English word. Of course, if there's much lobbying for it, \"Political Correctness\" may eventually claim another triumph. But for the time being, I think we shouldn't be giving the term a legitimacy that it doesn't have.-- +++$+++ ::Thanks, it makes more sense now (I had been wondering at first if a connection might be implied with Llamas or even Tibetan Lamas in some way :)), although I wonder how you came to encounter this version of the name in the first place. It's not really that common at all in my experience. Judging from the links you provided and other searches, "Ilamids" seems to be used in English by a few Iranian websites, for unclear reasons - perhaps they're using the Farsi (oops, Persian) form as a way of claiming their cultural heritage? A search for "Ilamids", "Ilamid language", as compared with "Elamites", "Elamite language", on either Google or Google books shows that "Ilamid" (apart from the names of some unrelated Muslim sultans) practically doesn't exist. (This includes the researcher cited by the Iranian news, who uses "Elamite" in his own writings [http://www.achemenet.com/pdf/nabu/nabu1999-052.pdf]). A look-up in an English dictionary or encyclopedia also shows that "Ilamid" is not an English word. Of course, if there's much lobbying for it, "Political Correctness" may eventually claim another triumph. But for the time being, I think we shouldn't be giving the term a legitimacy that it doesn't have.--[[User:Anonymous44|Anonymous44]] ([[User talk:Anonymous44|talk]]) 00:24, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
282418 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282415 +++$+++ 282415 +++$+++ 2008-08-17 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.218994260E09 +++$+++ Reply: Sorry - I just quickly looked up a couple of references to Ilamids (i.e. with a capital \"I\" at the beginning) on the internet to give you links you could check (and I could find) quickly. I have seen it used in various papers but, unfortunately, I don't have any of them with me still (I was doing a lot of reading on that period a couple of years ago - but haven't been recently). You may be right, though, that it is only used in Iranian sources, and its use here is not justified. I have just had a further look on the internet and have found only a few references to it. One source that does use it in its papers and which may indicate a wider acceptance is the \"Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies\" which is connected with London University's prestigious School of Oriental and African Studies. However, I now discover as I tried to post it here for you to check, that their website has been blacklisted by the Wikipedia (for reasons unknown to me). I am, therefore,  happy to leave it to other readers to decide whether it should be included in this article - I have no strong feelings either way. I will post all this correspondence on the Talk page to see what others think. Best wishes,  +++$+++ :Reply: Sorry - I just quickly looked up a couple of references to Ilamids (i.e. with a capital "I" at the beginning) on the internet to give you links you could check (and I could find) quickly. I have seen it used in various papers but, unfortunately, I don't have any of them with me still (I was doing a lot of reading on that period a couple of years ago - but haven't been recently). You may be right, though, that it is only used in Iranian sources, and its use here is not justified. I have just had a further look on the internet and have found only a few references to it. One source that does use it in its papers and which may indicate a wider acceptance is the "Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies" which is connected with London University's prestigious School of Oriental and African Studies. However, I now discover as I tried to post it here for you to check, that their website has been blacklisted by the Wikipedia (for reasons unknown to me). I am, therefore,  happy to leave it to other readers to decide whether it should be included in this article - I have no strong feelings either way. I will post all this correspondence on the Talk page to see what others think. Best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 10:31, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
282419 +++$+++ Anonymous44 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282415 +++$+++ 282418 +++$+++ 2008-08-17 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.219003140E09 +++$+++ About the CAIS's blacklisting - I don't know why it was done, but I do have the vague impression that they pursue a nationalist agenda (I don't quite remember how I got it, it might have been in connection with the description of the [[Cyrus cylinder]] as a \"charter of human rights\", which is the only Iranian-related issue I recall having participated in anyway). They point out in their \"About\" page that they are not connected to the London School any more. Best, -- +++$+++ ::About the CAIS's blacklisting - I don't know why it was done, but I do have the vague impression that they pursue a nationalist agenda (I don't quite remember how I got it, it might have been in connection with the description of the [[Cyrus cylinder]] as a "charter of human rights", which is the only Iranian-related issue I recall having participated in anyway). They point out in their "About" page that they are not connected to the London School any more. Best, --[[User:Anonymous44|Anonymous44]] ([[User talk:Anonymous44|talk]]) 12:59, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

20272 +++$+++ Bazza 7 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20272 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-23 14:23:00 +++$+++ 1.300915380E09 +++$+++ You reverted a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Leap_second&oldid=420135370 change] I made to [[Leap second]] in which I replaced the confusing abbreviation \"cy\" with \"century\". I had not understood immediately what \"cy\" meant and [[cy]] is not helpful. I can't find any references in Wikipedia's [[WP:DATE|manual of style]] to \"cy\" being a recognised abbreviation for century. You refer to the original source as using \"cy\" but as this is neither a quotation nor an exact copy of what is in it, I can't see how that overrides the MoS.  +++$+++ You reverted a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leap_second&oldid=420135370 change] I made to [[Leap second]] in which I replaced the confusing abbreviation "cy" with "century". I had not understood immediately what "cy" meant and [[cy]] is not helpful. I can't find any references in Wikipedia's [[WP:DATE|manual of style]] to "cy" being a recognised abbreviation for century. You refer to the original source as using "cy" but as this is neither a quotation nor an exact copy of what is in it, I can't see how that overrides the MoS. [[User:Bazza 7|Bazza]] ([[User talk:Bazza 7|talk]]) 14:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
20273 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20272 +++$+++ 20272 +++$+++ 2011-03-23 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.300931880E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Units of measurement]] under '''Scientific and technical units''' is the statement \"In scientific articles, use the units employed in the current scientific literature on that topic.\" \u2014  +++$+++ :[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Units of measurement]] under '''Scientific and technical units''' is the statement "In scientific articles, use the units employed in the current scientific literature on that topic." — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress|talk]]) 18:58, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

20275 +++$+++ Gsarwa +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20275 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-12 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.302596040E09 +++$+++ Where I should write it, because if I don't mistaken Roche limit want me to know him if I made a new article. Thank you so much. +++$+++ Where I should write it, because if I don't mistaken Roche limit want me to know him if I made a new article. Thank you so much.[[User:Gsarwa|Gsarwa]] ([[User talk:Gsarwa|talk]]) 01:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
20276 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20275 +++$+++ 20275 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.302608220E09 +++$+++ I see no relationship between [[Roche limit]], an astronomical problem, and [[ASEAN Exchanges]], a financial organization. Are you thinking of another person or company named Roche? \u2014  +++$+++ :I see no relationship between [[Roche limit]], an astronomical problem, and [[ASEAN Exchanges]], a financial organization. Are you thinking of another person or company named Roche? — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress|talk]]) 04:37, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

20278 +++$+++ Vgent +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-16 08:31:00 +++$+++ 1.308238260E09 +++$+++ The Umm al-Qura calendar is one of the most used Islamic calendars and now Wikipedians are directed to some less reliable calendar converters which do not always give any indication on which algorithms they are based.  +++$+++ The Umm al-Qura calendar is one of the most used Islamic calendars and now Wikipedians are directed to some less reliable calendar converters which do not always give any indication on which algorithms they are based. [[User:Vgent|AstroLynx]] ([[User talk:Vgent|talk]]) 08:31, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
20279 +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20278 +++$+++ 20278 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.308393000E09 +++$+++ I thought that a link could not be both a reference and an external link, but I can't find any such prohibition, so I'm reinstating your external link. \u2014  +++$+++ :I thought that a link could not be both a reference and an external link, but I can't find any such prohibition, so I'm reinstating your external link. — [[User:Joe Kress|Joe Kress]] ([[User talk:Joe Kress|talk]]) 03:30, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
20280 +++$+++ Vgent +++$+++ Joe Kress +++$+++ 20278 +++$+++ 20279 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 08:13:00 +++$+++ 1.308582780E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :: Thanks! [[User:Vgent|AstroLynx]] ([[User talk:Vgent|talk]]) 08:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

282423 +++$+++ CFynn +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282423 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-27 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.219835760E09 +++$+++ John - on 28 September 2007 you moved the article 'Gos Khug-pa Lhas-btsas to G\xf6 Lotsawa ~ unfortunately these are two entirely different figures. See my comment at:  [[Talk:G%C3%B6_Lotsawa]]. Since you moved the article nobody seems to have picked up on this mistake and further additions seem to have been made by well intentioned people who obviously don't know much about the subject and have not read their own sources. Anyway the article is now a real mess with things about the two figures mixed together. I don't have time to fix this myself just now.  +++$+++ John - on 28 September 2007 you moved the article 'Gos Khug-pa Lhas-btsas to Gö Lotsawa ~ unfortunately these are two entirely different figures. See my comment at:  [[Talk:G%C3%B6_Lotsawa]]. Since you moved the article nobody seems to have picked up on this mistake and further additions seem to have been made by well intentioned people who obviously don't know much about the subject and have not read their own sources. Anyway the article is now a real mess with things about the two figures mixed together. I don't have time to fix this myself just now. [[User:CFynn|Chris Fynn]] ([[User talk:CFynn|talk]]) 04:16, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
282424 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282423 +++$+++ 282423 +++$+++ 2008-08-27 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.219855320E09 +++$+++ Dear Chris: I have just had a brief look at your notes and the article on [[G\xf6 Lotsawa]] and it does look like you are right that I made a serious error last year when I combined information on the two men. I don't know yet how this happened, but the main thing is to correct the errors. I will do my best to sort the whole mess out over the next couple of days and will let you know when I have completed it so you can check the corrections or make any other suggestions you might have. So sorry for all the confusion. Oh, and thanks for picking up on the error - it will be good to get it all corrected! Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Dear Chris: I have just had a brief look at your notes and the article on [[Gö Lotsawa]] and it does look like you are right that I made a serious error last year when I combined information on the two men. I don't know yet how this happened, but the main thing is to correct the errors. I will do my best to sort the whole mess out over the next couple of days and will let you know when I have completed it so you can check the corrections or make any other suggestions you might have. So sorry for all the confusion. Oh, and thanks for picking up on the error - it will be good to get it all corrected! Sincerely, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 09:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
282425 +++$+++ CFynn +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282423 +++$+++ 282424 +++$+++ 2008-08-27 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.219856220E09 +++$+++ Hi John - Thanks for your message. There are often many Tibetan figures with similar or even identical names.  So one has to be careful with Tibetan biographies. Hope the links I added at the bottom of the article will help you sort it out.  +++$+++ ::Hi John - Thanks for your message. There are often many Tibetan figures with similar or even identical names.  So one has to be careful with Tibetan biographies. Hope the links I added at the bottom of the article will help you sort it out. [[User:CFynn|Chris Fynn]] ([[User talk:CFynn|talk]]) 09:57, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

20285 +++$+++ Nowyouseeme +++$+++ Haha169 +++$+++ 20285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-05 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.281054360E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For your work on [[Perry v. Schwarzenegger]] <span style=\"font-family:'tahoma bold',serif;border:1px solid Black;\"><span style=\"font-family:'tahoma bold',serif;border:1px solid Black;\"> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your work on [[Perry v. Schwarzenegger]] <span style="font-family:'tahoma bold',serif;border:1px solid Black;"><span style="font-family:'tahoma bold',serif;border:1px solid Black;">[[User:Nowyouseeme|<span style= "color:Black;background:#9370DB;">'''Nowyouseeme</span>]][[User talk:Nowyouseeme|<span style="background:Black;color:#9370DB;">talk2me'''</span>]]</span> 17:26, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
20286 +++$+++ Haha169 +++$+++ Haha169 +++$+++ 20285 +++$+++ 20285 +++$+++ 2010-08-05 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.281054660E09 +++$+++ Wow thank you :) -- +++$+++ :Wow thank you :) --[[User:Haha169|haha169]] ([[User talk:Haha169#top|talk]]) 17:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

534219 +++$+++ ReyBrujo +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-01 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.149151860E09 +++$+++ Hello there. Yes, the article is mature enough. A stub means that the article gives the minimun information about the topc (in example, \"Tanis Half-Elven is a fictional character in Dragonlance\"), enough to answer \"Who Tanis Half-Elven is?\" but not enough to answer \"Why Tanis Half-Elven must have its own article in Wikipedia?\" --  +++$+++ Hello there. Yes, the article is mature enough. A stub means that the article gives the minimun information about the topc (in example, "Tanis Half-Elven is a fictional character in Dragonlance"), enough to answer "Who Tanis Half-Elven is?" but not enough to answer "Why Tanis Half-Elven must have its own article in Wikipedia?" -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 01:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
534220 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ DoomsDay349 +++$+++ 534219 +++$+++ 534219 +++$+++ 2006-06-01 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.149218160E09 +++$+++ Replied on user's talk page. +++$+++ :Replied on user's talk page.[[User:DoomsDay349|DoomsDay349]] 20:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

282431 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-01 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.220320800E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ Regards, [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 19:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
282432 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282431 +++$+++ 282431 +++$+++ 2008-09-01 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.220327220E09 +++$+++ Hi Yaan: Yes, of course you are quite right. The mistake was due to a misreading by myself. Thank you for correcting it and removing the offending passage. I don't know how I missed such an obvious error. Thanks for picking up the problem and fixing it. It is great to have editors sometimes! Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi Yaan: Yes, of course you are quite right. The mistake was due to a misreading by myself. Thank you for correcting it and removing the offending passage. I don't know how I missed such an obvious error. Thanks for picking up the problem and fixing it. It is great to have editors sometimes! Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 20:47, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

20288 +++$+++ Hekerui +++$+++ Haha169 +++$+++ 20288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-19 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.292788740E09 +++$+++ Hi, I fixed the licensing of the file - you can't release it under the cc-0 license because the source file is licensed under more restrictive licenses that require that they (or one of them) be used for every derivative work (see the \"share-alike\" provision of the Creative Commons license). Please always check whether you have selected the correct license in the future and add categories. Best wishes  +++$+++ Hi, I fixed the licensing of the file - you can't release it under the cc-0 license because the source file is licensed under more restrictive licenses that require that they (or one of them) be used for every derivative work (see the "share-alike" provision of the Creative Commons license). Please always check whether you have selected the correct license in the future and add categories. Best wishes [[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 11:59, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
20289 +++$+++ Hekerui +++$+++ Haha169 +++$+++ 20288 +++$+++ 20288 +++$+++ 2010-12-19 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.292813400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note, quite a bit to fix there.  +++$+++ :Thanks for the note, quite a bit to fix there. [[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 18:50, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

282433 +++$+++ Jwinius +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282433 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-02 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.220405520E09 +++$+++ Hi John, Since I remember that you added some information to the ''[[Bothrops atrox]]'' article regarding Trinidad, I just wanted to let you know that I've removed it. This is because I recently discovered today that, apparently, the only ''[[Bothrops]]'' species found on Trinidad is now understood to be ''[[Bothrops asper]]''. This is also explained in the ''B. asper'' article, which already included mention of its Trinidadian common name, ''mapepire balsain''. Cheers, -- +++$+++ Hi John, Since I remember that you added some information to the ''[[Bothrops atrox]]'' article regarding Trinidad, I just wanted to let you know that I've removed it. This is because I recently discovered today that, apparently, the only ''[[Bothrops]]'' species found on Trinidad is now understood to be ''[[Bothrops asper]]''. This is also explained in the ''B. asper'' article, which already included mention of its Trinidadian common name, ''mapepire balsain''. Cheers, --[[User:Jwinius|Jwinius]] ([[User talk:Jwinius|talk]]) 18:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
282434 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282433 +++$+++ 282433 +++$+++ 2008-09-02 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.220420220E09 +++$+++ Hi! Thanks so much for informing me that you have made changes to the article and kept me up-to-date regarding the recent identification of the species of fer-de-lance or Bothrops found in Trinidad. I really appreciate you keeping me informed. All best wishes,  +++$+++ :Hi! Thanks so much for informing me that you have made changes to the article and kept me up-to-date regarding the recent identification of the species of fer-de-lance or Bothrops found in Trinidad. I really appreciate you keeping me informed. All best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:37, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

282436 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282436 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-19 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.221857460E09 +++$+++ Hi John. How are you? I've borrowed a book on Tibet:Life, Myth and Art. Its not fantastic but has some pretty good content. I wondered if you had heard of the [[Path of the Mani]] or whether we have this article already under a different name?  +++$+++ Hi John. How are you? I've borrowed a book on Tibet:Life, Myth and Art. Its not fantastic but has some pretty good content. I wondered if you had heard of the [[Path of the Mani]] or whether we have this article already under a different name? [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 13:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
282437 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282436 +++$+++ 282436 +++$+++ 2008-09-20 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.221920700E09 +++$+++ Sorry Ernst - I don't have that book available and I can't seem to find anything else about the \"Path of the Mani\" though I suspect it is a term for some pilgrimage. Will certainly let you know if I discover anything else. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Sorry Ernst - I don't have that book available and I can't seem to find anything else about the "Path of the Mani" though I suspect it is a term for some pilgrimage. Will certainly let you know if I discover anything else. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 07:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

20293 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ Haha169 +++$+++ 20293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-03 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.296721860E09 +++$+++ Could you as Djibouti to the map?, minor protest there.-- +++$+++ Could you as Djibouti to the map?, minor protest there.--[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 00:31, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
20294 +++$+++ victor falk +++$+++ Haha169 +++$+++ 20293 +++$+++ 20293 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.297112940E09 +++$+++ I reinserted it in the article from which it was removed. Perhaps sourcing might be wished. <sup><small><font color=\"green\">[[Special:Contributions\/Victor_falk|''walk'']]<\/font><\/small><\/sup> <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :I reinserted it in the article from which it was removed. Perhaps sourcing might be wished. <sup><small><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/Victor_falk|''walk'']]</font></small></sup> <font color="green">[[user:victor falk|''victor falk'']]</font><sup><small> <font color="green">[[user_talk:victor falk|''talk'']]</font></small></sup> 13:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

544583 +++$+++ Gimmetrow +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.194434700E09 +++$+++ I guess I'm interested, too.  +++$+++ I guess I'm interested, too. [[User_talk:Gimmetrow|''Gimmetrow'']] 03:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
544584 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544583 +++$+++ 544583 +++$+++ 2007-11-07 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.194436440E09 +++$+++ Good news!   +++$+++ :Good news!  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
544585 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544583 +++$+++ 544584 +++$+++ 2007-11-07 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.194437160E09 +++$+++ Gosh, you type fast; I'm still typing.  I've never nommed or co-nommed; do I just add my blurb on to the bottom of yours?  I expected PMA opposition; no surprise there.   +++$+++ ::Gosh, you type fast; I'm still typing.  I've never nommed or co-nommed; do I just add my blurb on to the bottom of yours?  I expected PMA opposition; no surprise there.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 04:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
544586 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544583 +++$+++ 544583 +++$+++ 2007-11-07 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.194438180E09 +++$+++ OK, I added the co-nom, but I'm not sure if that's how it should be formatted; please let me know.  Best,  +++$+++ :OK, I added the co-nom, but I'm not sure if that's how it should be formatted; please let me know.  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 04:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

282440 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282440 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-25 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.222365900E09 +++$+++ Wonderful. Your book sounds amazing!! Good luck with that. See my messages to [[User talk:Editorofthewiki#Here we go...]]. You'll see my computer is suffering from exactly the same problems. It keeps sending me false spyware warnings! Luckily by dad is was a former computer operator so he was able to help fix it relatively quickly! P.S I'm making good progress with the Nepalese towns and villages with some help from othera. See the crazy templates at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal\/District templates]] for progress. I;ve been using [http:\/\/www.digitalhimalaya.com\/collections\/nepalcensus\/form.php?selection=1 this] by [[Digital Himilaya]] for the basic demographics. Perhaps you are aware of the work of Digital Himilaya? Gradually there seems to be an increasein Nepali users on here. Lets hope these can be expanded!. Best  +++$+++ Wonderful. Your book sounds amazing!! Good luck with that. See my messages to [[User talk:Editorofthewiki#Here we go...]]. You'll see my computer is suffering from exactly the same problems. It keeps sending me false spyware warnings! Luckily by dad is was a former computer operator so he was able to help fix it relatively quickly! P.S I'm making good progress with the Nepalese towns and villages with some help from othera. See the crazy templates at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal/District templates]] for progress. I;ve been using [http://www.digitalhimalaya.com/collections/nepalcensus/form.php?selection=1 this] by [[Digital Himilaya]] for the basic demographics. Perhaps you are aware of the work of Digital Himilaya? Gradually there seems to be an increasein Nepali users on here. Lets hope these can be expanded!. Best [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 11:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
282441 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282440 +++$+++ 282440 +++$+++ 2008-09-29 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.222689240E09 +++$+++ Hi. I took the photo when I was in Van for 6 weeks in 1973 doing an article I hoped to sell to National Geographic magazine on the Urartian civilisation (which, unfortunately, did not work out). I am not exactly sure of the spot where the photo was taken - but there has been some earlier discussion with someone who thought they could identify the exact place - I could check them if you wish. All I remember is that it was not far out of the town of Van near Urartian ruins close to the lake and the old Urartian dock near the base of the Van citadel. The Armenian gravestones had been carved into slabs of rock previously used by the Urartians - this was clear as there were traces of Urartian cuneiform writing still on them. I have many impressions of Van at that time and many stories I could tell - I really don't know where to start. Are there some particular things you would like to know about? Please let me know. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Hi. I took the photo when I was in Van for 6 weeks in 1973 doing an article I hoped to sell to National Geographic magazine on the Urartian civilisation (which, unfortunately, did not work out). I am not exactly sure of the spot where the photo was taken - but there has been some earlier discussion with someone who thought they could identify the exact place - I could check them if you wish. All I remember is that it was not far out of the town of Van near Urartian ruins close to the lake and the old Urartian dock near the base of the Van citadel. The Armenian gravestones had been carved into slabs of rock previously used by the Urartians - this was clear as there were traces of Urartian cuneiform writing still on them. I have many impressions of Van at that time and many stories I could tell - I really don't know where to start. Are there some particular things you would like to know about? Please let me know. Sincerely, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 04:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

90764 +++$+++ Moisejp +++$+++ DCGeist +++$+++ 90764 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-19 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.279527120E09 +++$+++ Hi DCGeist. Thanks a lot for your help and suggestions so far on [[The Basement Tapes]]. I have a question about a recent punctuation-related change you made. You put the commas outside the song titles and quoted [[WP:MOS]], which says \"On Wikipedia, place all punctuation marks inside the quotation marks if they are part of the quoted material and outside if they are not.\" So far, I have been making the distinction between actual quotations and song titles, the latter which are not really quotations per se. There are no examples in that section of MOS that address song titles. I have been trying to follow that MOS rule for actual quoted material (quoting what someone says, etc.) but I did not believe that song titles fell into that category, and have been actively putting commas and periods within the song titles. Is it your understanding that they fall within the MOS rule? If so, I have a lot of song titles to change back to having the periods and commas outside the quotes. Or, since MOS does specifically address song titles, would you accept my interpretation of the rule, and not object to commas and periods within song titles? I believe this to be a \"cleaner\" style, rather than song titles with commas outside. Please let me know what you think. Sincerely,  +++$+++ Hi DCGeist. Thanks a lot for your help and suggestions so far on [[The Basement Tapes]]. I have a question about a recent punctuation-related change you made. You put the commas outside the song titles and quoted [[WP:MOS]], which says "On Wikipedia, place all punctuation marks inside the quotation marks if they are part of the quoted material and outside if they are not." So far, I have been making the distinction between actual quotations and song titles, the latter which are not really quotations per se. There are no examples in that section of MOS that address song titles. I have been trying to follow that MOS rule for actual quoted material (quoting what someone says, etc.) but I did not believe that song titles fell into that category, and have been actively putting commas and periods within the song titles. Is it your understanding that they fall within the MOS rule? If so, I have a lot of song titles to change back to having the periods and commas outside the quotes. Or, since MOS does specifically address song titles, would you accept my interpretation of the rule, and not object to commas and periods within song titles? I believe this to be a "cleaner" style, rather than song titles with commas outside. Please let me know what you think. Sincerely, [[User:Moisejp|Moisejp]] ([[User talk:Moisejp|talk]]) 01:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
90765 +++$+++ Moisejp +++$+++ DCGeist +++$+++ 90764 +++$+++ 90764 +++$+++ 2010-07-19 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.279527960E09 +++$+++ You're right, it does say that. Thanks for pointing that out. All right, I will change all the song titles over to this style. Thanks again!  +++$+++ :You're right, it does say that. Thanks for pointing that out. All right, I will change all the song titles over to this style. Thanks again! [[User:Moisejp|Moisejp]] ([[User talk:Moisejp|talk]]) 01:26, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
90766 +++$+++ Moisejp +++$+++ DCGeist +++$+++ 90764 +++$+++ 90765 +++$+++ 2010-07-22 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.279847640E09 +++$+++ DCGeist, I just wanted to say thanks again for all your help. You've really helped the article tremendously. The other reason I'm writing this message is to let you know that I have to be away for a couple of weeks. I let I.M.S. and Mick know this a while back and reminded them just now. But I just thought I'd let you know as well since you have been collaborating with us a lot. It's possible I may get a tiny bit of online time in there but if so it will be very little. Anyway, if the FAR process is still going on when I get back, I look forward to collaborating with you more then. Thank you.  +++$+++ ::DCGeist, I just wanted to say thanks again for all your help. You've really helped the article tremendously. The other reason I'm writing this message is to let you know that I have to be away for a couple of weeks. I let I.M.S. and Mick know this a while back and reminded them just now. But I just thought I'd let you know as well since you have been collaborating with us a lot. It's possible I may get a tiny bit of online time in there but if so it will be very little. Anyway, if the FAR process is still going on when I get back, I look forward to collaborating with you more then. Thank you. [[User:Moisejp|Moisejp]] ([[User talk:Moisejp|talk]]) 18:14, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

544588 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544588 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 04:00:00 +++$+++ 1.194436800E09 +++$+++ Please review the recent passages of [[Wikipedia talk:Footnotes]] before considering Gimmetrow further. He is revert-warring for an unsubstantiated claim of fact, and for an effort to make another guideline to make Wikipedia an instrument of language reform. (This is especially silly, since the matter in question is itself trivial: whether footnotes should go before or after punctuation; the shallowness of my feeling on this matter may be judged by the fact that I am arguing for the permission of a practice I do not myself follow,  just as I do not use British English but support both sides of ENGVAR). My feelings about admin bullies, however, are much more serious, and will be reflected in any future RfA.  +++$+++ Please review the recent passages of [[Wikipedia talk:Footnotes]] before considering Gimmetrow further. He is revert-warring for an unsubstantiated claim of fact, and for an effort to make another guideline to make Wikipedia an instrument of language reform. (This is especially silly, since the matter in question is itself trivial: whether footnotes should go before or after punctuation; the shallowness of my feeling on this matter may be judged by the fact that I am arguing for the permission of a practice I do not myself follow,  just as I do not use British English but support both sides of ENGVAR). My feelings about admin bullies, however, are much more serious, and will be reflected in any future RfA. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 04:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
544589 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544588 +++$+++ 544588 +++$+++ 2007-11-07 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.194439740E09 +++$+++ Stepping back myself,  I think my greatest objection is that Gimmetrow went  to the brink of 3RR to legislate on such a point. Busybodies should not be admins.  +++$+++ :Stepping back myself,  I think my greatest objection is that Gimmetrow went  to the brink of 3RR to legislate on such a point. Busybodies should not be admins. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 04:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

282446 +++$+++ Asdfg12345 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-05 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.225925520E09 +++$+++ Hi John, just notifying you of a [[Talk:Australian_Aboriginal_mythology#Aust._Aboriginal_totemism_-_cut_and_paste_from_article|message I left]] that you may be able to offer some advice on. Thanks.--<font style=\"bold\"> +++$+++ Hi John, just notifying you of a [[Talk:Australian_Aboriginal_mythology#Aust._Aboriginal_totemism_-_cut_and_paste_from_article|message I left]] that you may be able to offer some advice on. Thanks.--<font style="bold">[[User:Asdfg12345|'''Asdfg''']]</font><font color="black" style="bold">[[User_talk:Asdfg12345|'''12345''']]</font> 14:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
282447 +++$+++ Asdfg12345 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282446 +++$+++ 282446 +++$+++ 2008-11-11 09:39:00 +++$+++ 1.226425140E09 +++$+++ Caught your response. I have a bunch of pages scanned, maybe 25% of it, and I have to send them to someone one of these days soon. I was going to do so through mediafire.com, so I'll just give you the link here and you might want to download them and take a look out of interest. If you did that, I'd be interested in hearing your impressions. Best.--<font style=\"bold\"> +++$+++ :Caught your response. I have a bunch of pages scanned, maybe 25% of it, and I have to send them to someone one of these days soon. I was going to do so through mediafire.com, so I'll just give you the link here and you might want to download them and take a look out of interest. If you did that, I'd be interested in hearing your impressions. Best.--<font style="bold">[[User:Asdfg12345|'''Asdfg''']]</font><font color="black" style="bold">[[User_talk:Asdfg12345|'''12345''']]</font> 09:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
282448 +++$+++ Asdfg12345 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282446 +++$+++ 282446 +++$+++ 2008-11-16 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.226861280E09 +++$+++ Hey John. Finally got around to uploading the files. Reminding, they are from ''\"Dreamtime, the Aboriginal heritage: Australian Aboriginal myths in paintings \/ by Ainslie Roberts ; text by Melva Jean Roberts ; line illustrations by Ainslie Roberts\"''[http:\/\/catalogue.nla.gov.au\/Record\/119465]. It's about a quarter of it, or so. [http:\/\/www.mediafire.com\/?sharekey=42ff98b342cf1312d2db6fb9a8902bda Here's the link]. Peruse at your leisure, share your thoughts freely.--<font style=\"bold\"> +++$+++ :Hey John. Finally got around to uploading the files. Reminding, they are from ''"Dreamtime, the Aboriginal heritage: Australian Aboriginal myths in paintings / by Ainslie Roberts ; text by Melva Jean Roberts ; line illustrations by Ainslie Roberts"''[http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/119465]. It's about a quarter of it, or so. [http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=42ff98b342cf1312d2db6fb9a8902bda Here's the link]. Peruse at your leisure, share your thoughts freely.--<font style="bold">[[User:Asdfg12345|'''Asdfg''']]</font><font color="black" style="bold">[[User_talk:Asdfg12345|'''12345''']]</font> 10:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

532844 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532844 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-14 22:06:00 +++$+++ 1.181883960E09 +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Supreme (skateboard company)]]. Regards. --''' +++$+++ See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supreme (skateboard company)]]. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 22:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
532845 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532844 +++$+++ 532844 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.182006420E09 +++$+++ Ok, restored. See [[WP:BAND]] for guidelines how to improve the article. Most important, add references and state notability as you did  on the talk page. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Ok, restored. See [[WP:BAND]] for guidelines how to improve the article. Most important, add references and state notability as you did  on the talk page. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
532846 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532844 +++$+++ 532844 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.182006420E09 +++$+++ See [[Talk:\"John Augenblick\"]], someone already answered you there. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : See [[Talk:"John Augenblick"]], someone already answered you there. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
532847 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 532844 +++$+++ 532844 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.182035100E09 +++$+++ Hi. Sure, you can rewrite the article in the way you proposed. Don't forget, to assert the notability you'll need to add some external references. I'll restore the previous version now. Regards, --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Sure, you can rewrite the article in the way you proposed. Don't forget, to assert the notability you'll need to add some external references. I'll restore the previous version now. Regards, --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

20305 +++$+++ 82.149.174.107 +++$+++ Haha169 +++$+++ 20305 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-25 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.306376040E09 +++$+++ The colour of state Mocambique should be grey and not orange. The Mozambican Association for the Defence of Sexual Minorities (LAMBDA), the only organisation in the country working for gay, lesbian and transsexual citizens, on Tuesday praised Justice Minister Benvinda Levi for her categorical statement that homosexuality is not illegal in Mozambique. [[Special:Contributions\/82.149.174.107|82.149.174.107]] ( +++$+++ The colour of state Mocambique should be grey and not orange. The Mozambican Association for the Defence of Sexual Minorities (LAMBDA), the only organisation in the country working for gay, lesbian and transsexual citizens, on Tuesday praised Justice Minister Benvinda Levi for her categorical statement that homosexuality is not illegal in Mozambique. [[Special:Contributions/82.149.174.107|82.149.174.107]] ([[User talk:82.149.174.107|talk]]) 19:14, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
20306 +++$+++ Haha169 +++$+++ Haha169 +++$+++ 20305 +++$+++ 20305 +++$+++ 2011-05-25 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.306393020E09 +++$+++ Okay, ummm, it would be helpful if I knew what map you were talking about. Perhaps asking on the image's talk page, I'm not the maintainer for any map. -- +++$+++ :Okay, ummm, it would be helpful if I knew what map you were talking about. Perhaps asking on the image's talk page, I'm not the maintainer for any map. --[[User:Haha169|haha169]] ([[User talk:Haha169#top|talk]]) 23:57, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

282451 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282451 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-22 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.227381660E09 +++$+++ Yes I had never heard of it either. I did wonder if it was a hoax  +++$+++ Yes I had never heard of it either. I did wonder if it was a hoax [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Count Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span> 11:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
282452 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282451 +++$+++ 282451 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.227420660E09 +++$+++ Hi again! Well - I really don't know what to say, but the French site (with English and other languages available) looks quite pukka to me and, if it is a hoax, it is a very elaborate one - I personally doubt that it is. Check it out at [http:\/\/sakya-ngor.org\/ Link to the French Buddhist Ngor temple.] Then, please let me know what you think. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi again! Well - I really don't know what to say, but the French site (with English and other languages available) looks quite pukka to me and, if it is a hoax, it is a very elaborate one - I personally doubt that it is. Check it out at [http://sakya-ngor.org/ Link to the French Buddhist Ngor temple.] Then, please let me know what you think. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
282453 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282451 +++$+++ 282452 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.227422400E09 +++$+++ Additional note - I just found several brief references to the monastery and group in Tucci's ''The Religions of Tibet'' and have added a short bit of text on the founding of the first monastery to the article. I think we can rest assured now that is definitely not a hoax. The article could sure do with some more work on it though. Cheers again,  +++$+++ ::Additional note - I just found several brief references to the monastery and group in Tucci's ''The Religions of Tibet'' and have added a short bit of text on the founding of the first monastery to the article. I think we can rest assured now that is definitely not a hoax. The article could sure do with some more work on it though. Cheers again, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

20310 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-14 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.118777160E09 +++$+++ The relevant guideline is [[Wikipedia:Disambig]], and also see [[:Category:Disambiguation]]. It may be appropriate to create [[Infinite Loop (street)]], and at the top of [[Infinite loop]] add a line that links there. The earlier case was two pages of which the names only differed in capitalization - and that is a [[bad thing]].  +++$+++ The relevant guideline is [[Wikipedia:Disambig]], and also see [[:Category:Disambiguation]]. It may be appropriate to create [[Infinite Loop (street)]], and at the top of [[Infinite loop]] add a line that links there. The earlier case was two pages of which the names only differed in capitalization - and that is a [[bad thing]]. [[User:Radiant!|R]][[User_talk:Radiant!|adiant]][[meta:mergist|_<font color="orange">&gt;|&lt;</font>]] 12:26, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
20311 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20310 +++$+++ 20310 +++$+++ 2005-06-14 12:39:00 +++$+++ 1.118777940E09 +++$+++ You are correct, that was my reasoning. We sometimes do that on wikipages if one of the two topics is only a very short definition.  +++$+++ *You are correct, that was my reasoning. We sometimes do that on wikipages if one of the two topics is only a very short definition. [[User:Radiant!|R]][[User_talk:Radiant!|adiant]][[meta:mergist|_<font color="orange">&gt;|&lt;</font>]] 12:39, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

20312 +++$+++ Peregrine981 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20312 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-06-20 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.119260760E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Peregrine981|Peregrine981]] 02:46, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
20313 +++$+++ Peregrine981 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20312 +++$+++ 20312 +++$+++ 2005-06-20 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.119291000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Peregrine981|Peregrine981]] 11:10, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

571364 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.168877520E09 +++$+++ OK I\/ve seen your damned thing pass through a large part of my watch list - but I object to when a stubbed article gets an uncat notice!  - please explain what I need to do to or where to go to have an argument about this  +++$+++ OK I/ve seen your damned thing pass through a large part of my watch list - but I object to when a stubbed article gets an uncat notice!  - please explain what I need to do to or where to go to have an argument about this [[User talk:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 08:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
571365 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571364 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.168877940E09 +++$+++ Still going - the Indonesian geography stub has a purpose - I believe your notice to be innapropiate - the stub name is idnetifying the ctaegory when the stub is adequately populated - if the damned thing goes through all the stubs I know for Indonesia - then - that means we will have to explore some means of negotiation in good faith... :)  +++$+++ ::Still going - the Indonesian geography stub has a purpose - I believe your notice to be innapropiate - the stub name is idnetifying the ctaegory when the stub is adequately populated - if the damned thing goes through all the stubs I know for Indonesia - then - that means we will have to explore some means of negotiation in good faith... :) [[User talk:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 08:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
571366 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571364 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.168878060E09 +++$+++ You're not going to tell me this automated and youre not at your computer when its going?  whoa!  +++$+++ ::You're not going to tell me this automated and youre not at your computer when its going?  whoa! [[User talk:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 08:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
571367 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571364 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.168884300E09 +++$+++ My issue if its not clear is that a lot of indonesian geography stubs are tagged as such - if your mechanism goes and tags them, I would need some explanation as to why you think such action is justified - I can think of a lot of other issues in wikipedia that are more pressing!   +++$+++ ::My issue if its not clear is that a lot of indonesian geography stubs are tagged as such - if your mechanism goes and tags them, I would need some explanation as to why you think such action is justified - I can think of a lot of other issues in wikipedia that are more pressing!  [[User talk:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 10:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
571368 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571364 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.168951920E09 +++$+++ Time given - for my part  - probably better to drop it - specially if you are going for review  :)  +++$+++ ::Time given - for my part  - probably better to drop it - specially if you are going for review  :) [[User talk:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 04:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
571369 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571364 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.168952400E09 +++$+++ Rather than try for explanations I would suggest you drop it - safer that way   +++$+++ ::Rather than try for explanations I would suggest you drop it - safer that way  [[User talk:SatuSuro|SatuSuro]] 05:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
571370 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571364 +++$+++ 571364 +++$+++ 2007-01-16 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.168956060E09 +++$+++ Lets merge these. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.ms]] +++$+++ *Lets merge these. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.ms]][[User:Dfrg.msc|c]] <small><sup> [[User talk:Dfrg.msc|1]] . [[Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man|2]] . [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Dfrg.msc|Editor Review]]</sup></small> 06:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

20314 +++$+++ Mrfixter +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20314 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-04 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.120543860E09 +++$+++ Please read [[No original research]], particularly the section about cite your sources. If you can cite a reputable source that says that the Sunday Times views are opposed to Galloways, lets see that source. If not, then it is your original research. Also read [[poisoning the well]]. -- +++$+++ Please read [[No original research]], particularly the section about cite your sources. If you can cite a reputable source that says that the Sunday Times views are opposed to Galloways, lets see that source. If not, then it is your original research. Also read [[poisoning the well]]. --[[User:Mrfixter|Mrfixter]] 4 July 2005 23:11 (UTC)
20315 +++$+++ Mrfixter +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20314 +++$+++ 20314 +++$+++ 2005-07-04 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.120545000E09 +++$+++ Please cite a reputable source that says that the Sunday Times views are in opposition to Galloways. You are poisoning the well by attempting to cast doubt on the Sunday Times as a source on his marriage difficulties. -- +++$+++ :Please cite a reputable source that says that the Sunday Times views are in opposition to Galloways. You are poisoning the well by attempting to cast doubt on the Sunday Times as a source on his marriage difficulties. --[[User:Mrfixter|Mrfixter]] 4 July 2005 23:30 (UTC)
20316 +++$+++ Mrfixter +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20314 +++$+++ 20315 +++$+++ 2005-07-04 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.120546260E09 +++$+++ The Sunday Times intentions are not the issue. The Sunday Times is a reputable source and so should be quoted about a story concerning Galloways personal life. The Sunday Times politics with regard to Galloway are pure speculation on your part and original research. That a newspaper has a bias is not worth putting in an article about Galloway. Has anyone claimed that the Sunday Times has been running a witchhunt against him? Cite your sources! -- +++$+++ ::The Sunday Times intentions are not the issue. The Sunday Times is a reputable source and so should be quoted about a story concerning Galloways personal life. The Sunday Times politics with regard to Galloway are pure speculation on your part and original research. That a newspaper has a bias is not worth putting in an article about Galloway. Has anyone claimed that the Sunday Times has been running a witchhunt against him? Cite your sources! --[[User:Mrfixter|Mrfixter]] 4 July 2005 23:51 (UTC)
20317 +++$+++ Mrfixter +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20314 +++$+++ 20316 +++$+++ 2005-07-05 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.120582320E09 +++$+++ No, I never said the Sunday Times is absolutely reliable, I only stated that it is a reliable source. I never denied it had a bias either, I was only stating that your original research about the Sunday Times having views in opposition to Galloway should not be in the article. I would also draw your attention to the fact that at the time Galloway was NOT a labour mp, having been expelled from the labour party a while before the general election. He was running as a Respect party candidate, not a labour one. I think you should also read [[WP:NPOV]]. -- +++$+++ :::No, I never said the Sunday Times is absolutely reliable, I only stated that it is a reliable source. I never denied it had a bias either, I was only stating that your original research about the Sunday Times having views in opposition to Galloway should not be in the article. I would also draw your attention to the fact that at the time Galloway was NOT a labour mp, having been expelled from the labour party a while before the general election. He was running as a Respect party candidate, not a labour one. I think you should also read [[WP:NPOV]]. --[[User:Mrfixter|Mrfixter]] 5 July 2005 09:52 (UTC)

544604 +++$+++ Perspicacite +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-08 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.194519420E09 +++$+++ You're trying to bait me into a conflict so you can block me. I'm not stupid. I'm not going to bite. You should know better.  +++$+++ You're trying to bait me into a conflict so you can block me. I'm not stupid. I'm not going to bite. You should know better. [[User:Perspicacite|Perspicacite]] 02:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
544605 +++$+++ Perspicacite +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544604 +++$+++ 544604 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.194519720E09 +++$+++ Really? You dont think posting an NPA warning more than 24 hours after a conflict has been resolved qualifies as baiting? Based on a diff that doesnt mention someone personally in any way? Perhaps you should step back and look at the wisdom of your post on my talkpage.  +++$+++ :Really? You dont think posting an NPA warning more than 24 hours after a conflict has been resolved qualifies as baiting? Based on a diff that doesnt mention someone personally in any way? Perhaps you should step back and look at the wisdom of your post on my talkpage. [[User:Perspicacite|Perspicacite]] 03:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

20318 +++$+++ Cleduc +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-07-18 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.121676900E09 +++$+++ That having been said, [[:Category:Gay UK MPs]] needs work as well.  I'm working through [[:Category:LGBT actors]] before I do that, though.  Cheers,  +++$+++ That having been said, [[:Category:Gay UK MPs]] needs work as well.  I'm working through [[:Category:LGBT actors]] before I do that, though.  Cheers, [[User:Cleduc|Cleduc]] 01:55, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
20319 +++$+++ Cleduc +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20318 +++$+++ 20318 +++$+++ 2005-07-19 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.121807940E09 +++$+++ I beg to differ: if you click on [[:Category:Gay UK MPs]] you will see at the bottom that it is a subcategory of [[:Category:British MPs]].  Whether this is absolutely necessary or not I do not know -- I don't know if there's consensus that [[:Category:British MPs]] has grown huge and unwieldy like [[[[:Category:Gay, lesbian or bisexual people|certain other categories]].  However, removing [[:Category:British MPs]] did not remove that attribute from that article -- it remains in the same category hierarchy nonetheless. However, I'm not terribly pleased with [[:Category:Gay UK MPs]] being under [[:Category:British MPs]], but I haven't tackled that one yet.  Cheers,  +++$+++ : I beg to differ: if you click on [[:Category:Gay UK MPs]] you will see at the bottom that it is a subcategory of [[:Category:British MPs]].  Whether this is absolutely necessary or not I do not know -- I don't know if there's consensus that [[:Category:British MPs]] has grown huge and unwieldy like [[[[:Category:Gay, lesbian or bisexual people|certain other categories]].  However, removing [[:Category:British MPs]] did not remove that attribute from that article -- it remains in the same category hierarchy nonetheless. However, I'm not terribly pleased with [[:Category:Gay UK MPs]] being under [[:Category:British MPs]], but I haven't tackled that one yet.  Cheers, [[User:Cleduc|Cleduc]] 14:19, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

544607 +++$+++ Perspicacite +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544607 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-08 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.194522240E09 +++$+++ Yeah, actually, I do. Is there a reason you're not signing your posts? Consider that a rhetorical question. I'd prefer you not contact me in the future unless you have something to discuss.  +++$+++ Yeah, actually, I do. Is there a reason you're not signing your posts? Consider that a rhetorical question. I'd prefer you not contact me in the future unless you have something to discuss. [[User:Perspicacite|Perspicacite]] 03:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
544608 +++$+++ Perspicacite +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544607 +++$+++ 544607 +++$+++ 2007-11-08 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.194522720E09 +++$+++ For future reference, [[Wikipedia:Signatures]].  +++$+++ :For future reference, [[Wikipedia:Signatures]]. [[User:Perspicacite|Perspicacite]] 03:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

605120 +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ 605120 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-28 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.188292020E09 +++$+++ I'm not so sure that such a detailed computation belongs in an encyclopaedia, but that's another matter. --  +++$+++ I'm not so sure that such a detailed computation belongs in an encyclopaedia, but that's another matter. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] ([[User talk:Jitse Niesen|talk]]) 02:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
605121 +++$+++ Vossman +++$+++ Jitse Niesen +++$+++ 605120 +++$+++ 605120 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 17:07:00 +++$+++ 1.188346020E09 +++$+++ I've cleaned up the section. Let me know if you like it better. -- +++$+++ : I've cleaned up the section. Let me know if you like it better. --[[User:Vossman|vossman]] 17:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

282468 +++$+++ thumperward +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-20 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.229800200E09 +++$+++ I noticed you just changed a [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=6th_Dalai_Lama&curid=1192264&diff=259144846&oldid=259076887 second-level header into a third-level header]. Headers are nested consecutively - all third-level headers should be under second-level ones, and as this is the first subheader in the article it must be a second-level header. See [[Wikipedia: Guide to layout#Headings and sections]] for more details. Thanks!  +++$+++ I noticed you just changed a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=6th_Dalai_Lama&curid=1192264&diff=259144846&oldid=259076887 second-level header into a third-level header]. Headers are nested consecutively - all third-level headers should be under second-level ones, and as this is the first subheader in the article it must be a second-level header. See [[Wikipedia: Guide to layout#Headings and sections]] for more details. Thanks! [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 11:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
282469 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282468 +++$+++ 282468 +++$+++ 2008-12-20 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.229800860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pointing out the rule about section headers - I was not aware of it. Will try my best to fix any I have done incorrectly and to keep aware of it in future. Thanks again. Season's greetings!  +++$+++ :Thanks for pointing out the rule about section headers - I was not aware of it. Will try my best to fix any I have done incorrectly and to keep aware of it in future. Thanks again. Season's greetings! [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 11:21, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

20326 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-15 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.129428120E09 +++$+++ Hi icarus, just had a look at your latest revision. I have to still say, I don't see why you insist on going through theories of whether Harry was right or wrong in what he concluded about the potions\/spells. The book does not discuss whether Harry might have made a mistake, I havn't particularly (or indeed at all) seen this point debated by anyone seriously arguing that Harry was wrong. I am not convinced it is important to argue whether he was right, or to explicitly argue at all about it in the story. What is gained by proposing alternative interpretations?  +++$+++ Hi icarus, just had a look at your latest revision. I have to still say, I don't see why you insist on going through theories of whether Harry was right or wrong in what he concluded about the potions/spells. The book does not discuss whether Harry might have made a mistake, I havn't particularly (or indeed at all) seen this point debated by anyone seriously arguing that Harry was wrong. I am not convinced it is important to argue whether he was right, or to explicitly argue at all about it in the story. What is gained by proposing alternative interpretations? [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 19:02, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
20327 +++$+++ Icarus3 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20326 +++$+++ 20326 +++$+++ 2005-10-16 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.129459260E09 +++$+++ When did I say that Harry was wrong about his conclusions?  I never said that he was wrong to think that the spells were written by the HBP.  You, however, are implying that because it was not specifically mentioned that Harry thought the potions tips were the Prince's original work, that means that Harry didn't think that.  This is not confirmed by the book.  It is an extrapolation that may or may not turn out to be true.  Or was it something else you thought I was saying Harry was wrong about? (BTW, if you reply, please do so on my talk page.  I don't check wikipedia as often or as thoroughly as I used to, so I'll probably miss it if you post it elsewhere.  Thanks!)-- +++$+++ :When did I say that Harry was wrong about his conclusions?  I never said that he was wrong to think that the spells were written by the HBP.  You, however, are implying that because it was not specifically mentioned that Harry thought the potions tips were the Prince's original work, that means that Harry didn't think that.  This is not confirmed by the book.  It is an extrapolation that may or may not turn out to be true.  Or was it something else you thought I was saying Harry was wrong about? (BTW, if you reply, please do so on my talk page.  I don't check wikipedia as often or as thoroughly as I used to, so I'll probably miss it if you post it elsewhere.  Thanks!)--[[User:Icarus3|Icarus]] 03:41, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
20328 +++$+++ Icarus3 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20326 +++$+++ 20327 +++$+++ 2005-10-17 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.129547400E09 +++$+++ It occurs to me that you may not even be aware of how leading your wordings have been.  Look at the descriptions of the events surrounding Dumbledore's death for examples of how words can state mere facts, but be worded in such a way to lead people off in a particular direction.  For example, one editor tried to add \"But things in the Harry Potter world are not always as they seem.\"  See how this implies that that is true in this specific case, even if the sentence itself is only a general statement?  If someone strategically added \"But Dumbledore trusted Snape, and he demonstrated his loyalty many times in the earlier books.\" after a section about Snape's possible defection, that too would be a statement of fact, but the wording and placement within the article would lead readers in a specific direction.  You may think that you're merely stating the facts, but you're doing so in such a way as to lead the reader in a very specific direction (intentionally or not).  I still question whether or not your theory is widely accepted enough to be notable, as you have provided no evidence on that, but like I've said, I've decided to stop pursuing that line.  Now my main concern is that the article not lead the reader to think that one particular as-of-yet unverified theory is more valid than another.  -- +++$+++ ::It occurs to me that you may not even be aware of how leading your wordings have been.  Look at the descriptions of the events surrounding Dumbledore's death for examples of how words can state mere facts, but be worded in such a way to lead people off in a particular direction.  For example, one editor tried to add "But things in the Harry Potter world are not always as they seem."  See how this implies that that is true in this specific case, even if the sentence itself is only a general statement?  If someone strategically added "But Dumbledore trusted Snape, and he demonstrated his loyalty many times in the earlier books." after a section about Snape's possible defection, that too would be a statement of fact, but the wording and placement within the article would lead readers in a specific direction.  You may think that you're merely stating the facts, but you're doing so in such a way as to lead the reader in a very specific direction (intentionally or not).  I still question whether or not your theory is widely accepted enough to be notable, as you have provided no evidence on that, but like I've said, I've decided to stop pursuing that line.  Now my main concern is that the article not lead the reader to think that one particular as-of-yet unverified theory is more valid than another.  --[[User:Icarus3|Icarus]] 04:10, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

282472 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282472 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-28 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.230530340E09 +++$+++ John. I very much appreciate your work but I'm finding you often rely too heavily on quoting sections from books. Often you quote many paragraphs from books when really it should be written from an encyclopedic point of view in our own words or reworded and then using citations. For example [[Samding Monastery]]. Really that should be written in your own words as an encyclopedic description, keeping to the main points!! +++$+++ John. I very much appreciate your work but I'm finding you often rely too heavily on quoting sections from books. Often you quote many paragraphs from books when really it should be written from an encyclopedic point of view in our own words or reworded and then using citations. For example [[Samding Monastery]]. Really that should be written in your own words as an encyclopedic description, keeping to the main points!![[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 21:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
282473 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282472 +++$+++ 282472 +++$+++ 2008-12-28 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.230532740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for raising the issue - it does need attention. All best wishes,  +++$+++ :Thanks for raising the issue - it does need attention. All best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

20330 +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-03 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.131030120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up. I'll update the watchlist. Incidentally, I keep this watchlist \"public\" (take a look at the actual watchlist [[User:Deathphoenix\/HarryPotterWatchlist|article]] and you will see that I'm perfectly happy to let other people help me out with the watchlist. :-) Thanks, [[User:Deathphoenix|D]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|'''e''']] +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up. I'll update the watchlist. Incidentally, I keep this watchlist "public" (take a look at the actual watchlist [[User:Deathphoenix/HarryPotterWatchlist|article]] and you will see that I'm perfectly happy to let other people help me out with the watchlist. :-) Thanks, [[User:Deathphoenix|D]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|'''e''']][[User:Deathphoenix|ath]][[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''phoenix''']] 07:02, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
20331 +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20330 +++$+++ 20330 +++$+++ 2005-11-03 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.131030240E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... when I think about it, I don't really see any harm in keeping it. It'll come in useful if, say, someone tries to remove the redirect and create another article. If this is against consensus, it'll let the rest of us revert this easily. If this is according to consensus, we don't have to re-add the article to the watchlist. Thanks, [[User:Deathphoenix|D]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|'''e''']] +++$+++ :Hmmm... when I think about it, I don't really see any harm in keeping it. It'll come in useful if, say, someone tries to remove the redirect and create another article. If this is against consensus, it'll let the rest of us revert this easily. If this is according to consensus, we don't have to re-add the article to the watchlist. Thanks, [[User:Deathphoenix|D]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|'''e''']][[User:Deathphoenix|ath]][[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''phoenix''']] 07:04, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
20332 +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20330 +++$+++ 20331 +++$+++ 2005-11-03 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.131030960E09 +++$+++ Yup, looks like I have [[Mr Ollivander]] on the watchlist as well. I think I agree with having Mr Ollivander's store merged with [[Diagon Alley]]. I think keeping info on his store and Mr Ollivander himself separate, but I'm not strongly of this opinion. I think most of the information available in the novels about Mr Ollivander is about his store anyway. --[[User:Deathphoenix|D]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|'''e''']] +++$+++ ::Yup, looks like I have [[Mr Ollivander]] on the watchlist as well. I think I agree with having Mr Ollivander's store merged with [[Diagon Alley]]. I think keeping info on his store and Mr Ollivander himself separate, but I'm not strongly of this opinion. I think most of the information available in the novels about Mr Ollivander is about his store anyway. --[[User:Deathphoenix|D]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|'''e''']][[User:Deathphoenix|ath]][[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''phoenix''']] 07:16, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

282475 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282475 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-31 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.230760440E09 +++$+++ Hello great man John. How are you? I've created a few new articles from the historical Amdo area (and created [[:Category:Amdo]], much of which of course falls within Qinghai, and I have noticed a huge number of articles missing from the autonomous areas that used to be part of Tibet. I've started [[Gongchen Monastery]], and [[Longwu Temple]], perhaps you have something on them. BTW an article I created, [[Uliger]] is up for deletion. I wondered if you had anything on it in your books seems as some of the tales also concern Tibet and Central Asia. I'm literally freezing as I type at this moment, its -2 celsius here today and I feel like I'm in a freezer or being cryogenically frozen! Funnily enough it is the coldest day of the year, being the last!  +++$+++ Hello great man John. How are you? I've created a few new articles from the historical Amdo area (and created [[:Category:Amdo]], much of which of course falls within Qinghai, and I have noticed a huge number of articles missing from the autonomous areas that used to be part of Tibet. I've started [[Gongchen Monastery]], and [[Longwu Temple]], perhaps you have something on them. BTW an article I created, [[Uliger]] is up for deletion. I wondered if you had anything on it in your books seems as some of the tales also concern Tibet and Central Asia. I'm literally freezing as I type at this moment, its -2 celsius here today and I feel like I'm in a freezer or being cryogenically frozen! Funnily enough it is the coldest day of the year, being the last! [[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 13:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
282476 +++$+++ Davin +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282475 +++$+++ 282475 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.232764140E09 +++$+++ Your welcome :-)  +++$+++ :Your welcome :-) [[User:Davin|Davin]] ([[User talk:Davin|talk]]) 18:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

544620 +++$+++ Onorem +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.194489780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the offer. I'll consider it and try to let you know in the next couple days. -- +++$+++ Thanks for the offer. I'll consider it and try to let you know in the next couple days. --[[User:Onorem|Onorem]]♠[[User talk:Onorem|Dil]] 18:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
544621 +++$+++ Onorem +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544620 +++$+++ 544620 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.194690060E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the delayed response. I'm thinking that now that IP page creation is looking like it might not happen, I'm going to decline at the moment. I'd prefer being nominated because someone feels that I should be an admin instead of because someone feels that more admins are needed, and I'm acceptable due to lack of other candidates. I do appreciate the offer, and I do think that eventually being an admin will be more of a goal now than it's been for me in the past...but the circumstance doesn't seem right for me at the moment. Again, thanks for your consideration...and if you'd like to nominate me at a later time, I'd probably be interested. -- +++$+++ :Sorry for the delayed response. I'm thinking that now that IP page creation is looking like it might not happen, I'm going to decline at the moment. I'd prefer being nominated because someone feels that I should be an admin instead of because someone feels that more admins are needed, and I'm acceptable due to lack of other candidates. I do appreciate the offer, and I do think that eventually being an admin will be more of a goal now than it's been for me in the past...but the circumstance doesn't seem right for me at the moment. Again, thanks for your consideration...and if you'd like to nominate me at a later time, I'd probably be interested. --[[User:Onorem|Onorem]]♠[[User talk:Onorem|Dil]] 02:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
544622 +++$+++ Onorem +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544620 +++$+++ 544621 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.194691500E09 +++$+++ I don't necessarily disagree with you, and maybe the fact that I'm declining right now means I'm letting my ego get involved where it doesn't belong. I'm not really trying to consider it an \"award\" myself, It's just strange timing 20,000 edits in. I'd prefer to be confident that I'm being considered on my merits rather than the current situation. If you'd be willing to postpone, I'd be very likely to accept a nomination in a month or so. Thanks again for the offer.  -- +++$+++ ::I don't necessarily disagree with you, and maybe the fact that I'm declining right now means I'm letting my ego get involved where it doesn't belong. I'm not really trying to consider it an "award" myself, It's just strange timing 20,000 edits in. I'd prefer to be confident that I'm being considered on my merits rather than the current situation. If you'd be willing to postpone, I'd be very likely to accept a nomination in a month or so. Thanks again for the offer.  --[[User:Onorem|Onorem]]♠[[User talk:Onorem|Dil]] 02:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

282477 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-07 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.231378020E09 +++$+++ Replied on [[Talk:Gan Ying]]. If you find it necessary to be silent, that would be regrettable; I was replacing a claim that he was describing \"Roman democracy\", which seems most unlikely.  +++$+++ Replied on [[Talk:Gan Ying]]. If you find it necessary to be silent, that would be regrettable; I was replacing a claim that he was describing "Roman democracy", which seems most unlikely. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 17:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
282478 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282477 +++$+++ 282477 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.231412400E09 +++$+++ You added a statement to the article saying that, \"Gan Ying also described the adoptive monarchy of Nerva.\" This might be so - the timing is right - but there is no other evidence that I know of to support this assertion. That is why I put a \"citation needed\" tag on the claim and wrote to you to inform you i had done so. I still think Gan Ying was probably just repeating a fabulous tale. Unless there is some real evidence relating his account to Nerva's accession I think you should remove this statement. It wouldn't hurt, of course, to make it plain that Gan Ying's description of the process of choosing Rome's leaders was idealistic in the extreme, and certainly not factual. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :You added a statement to the article saying that, "Gan Ying also described the adoptive monarchy of Nerva." This might be so - the timing is right - but there is no other evidence that I know of to support this assertion. That is why I put a "citation needed" tag on the claim and wrote to you to inform you i had done so. I still think Gan Ying was probably just repeating a fabulous tale. Unless there is some real evidence relating his account to Nerva's accession I think you should remove this statement. It wouldn't hurt, of course, to make it plain that Gan Ying's description of the process of choosing Rome's leaders was idealistic in the extreme, and certainly not factual. Sincerely, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 03:00, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
282479 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282477 +++$+++ 282478 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.231413600E09 +++$+++ Sorry, let me be clearer: If you find it necessary ''that the article'' to be silent ''on this subject'', then make it so, unfortunate as that would be....  +++$+++ ::Sorry, let me be clearer: If you find it necessary ''that the article'' to be silent ''on this subject'', then make it so, unfortunate as that would be.... [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 03:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
282480 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282477 +++$+++ 282478 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.231414440E09 +++$+++ PS I have just noticed for the first time that you were replacing an earlier claim in the article that: \"He also describes the Roman practise of democracy, their physical appearance and riches:\". I have no idea who added this to the article - and it '''is''' clearly misleading. However, I still think your claim that Gan Ying was referring to Nerva's accession is also misleading and needs either to be removed or qualified. Sincerely,  +++$+++ ::PS I have just noticed for the first time that you were replacing an earlier claim in the article that: "He also describes the Roman practise of democracy, their physical appearance and riches:". I have no idea who added this to the article - and it '''is''' clearly misleading. However, I still think your claim that Gan Ying was referring to Nerva's accession is also misleading and needs either to be removed or qualified. Sincerely, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 03:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
282481 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282477 +++$+++ 282480 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.231417500E09 +++$+++ Fine.  Let me think about phrasing.  +++$+++ :::Fine.  Let me think about phrasing. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 04:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
282482 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282477 +++$+++ 282477 +++$+++ 2009-01-08 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.231417620E09 +++$+++ Great! Thanks for your help. Good luck with it. Cheers, +++$+++ :Great! Thanks for your help. Good luck with it. Cheers,[[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 04:27, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

20334 +++$+++ KnowledgeOfSelf +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-11-10 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.131619740E09 +++$+++ The book was [[Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix]] I'm  sorry for not specifing which book. Cheers.  +++$+++ The book was [[Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix]] I'm  sorry for not specifing which book. Cheers. [[user:KnowledgeOfSelf|<font color=#151B8D>Knowledge<font color=#C11B17>Of<font color=#C11B17>Self</font>]] | [[user talk:KnowledgeOfSelf|<font color= #461B7E>talk</font>]]. 02:49, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
20335 +++$+++ KnowledgeOfSelf +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20334 +++$+++ 20334 +++$+++ 2005-11-10 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.131622560E09 +++$+++ The chapter is Career Advice, sorry to take so long to replie. I was caught up in a basketball game and archiving my talk page.  +++$+++ :The chapter is Career Advice, sorry to take so long to replie. I was caught up in a basketball game and archiving my talk page. [[user:KnowledgeOfSelf|<font color=#151B8D>Knowledge<font color=#C11B17>Of<font color=#C11B17>Self</font>]] | [[user talk:KnowledgeOfSelf|<font color= #461B7E>talk</font>]]. 03:36, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
20336 +++$+++ KnowledgeOfSelf +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20334 +++$+++ 20335 +++$+++ 2005-11-10 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.131623100E09 +++$+++ LOL NO! I'm watching a [[Chicago Bulls]] game on T.V. or I guess I'm listening to it since I'm watching my editing lol. It's freezing cold outside, I don't think I'd be playin basketball right now :-D  +++$+++ ::LOL NO! I'm watching a [[Chicago Bulls]] game on T.V. or I guess I'm listening to it since I'm watching my editing lol. It's freezing cold outside, I don't think I'd be playin basketball right now :-D [[user:KnowledgeOfSelf|<font color=#151B8D>Knowledge<font color=#C11B17>Of<font color=#C11B17>Self</font>]] | [[user talk:KnowledgeOfSelf|<font color= #461B7E>talk</font>]]. 03:45, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
20337 +++$+++ KnowledgeOfSelf +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20334 +++$+++ 20336 +++$+++ 2005-11-12 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.131861060E09 +++$+++ I wanted to leave this directly on your talk page. lol The reason Slughorn rarely mentions Snape is because Snape is either A) A former death eater, or B) A current death eater. (Who knows for sure which he is). If you will recall Slughorn doesn't like to ave the children of death eaters in his Slugclub. On the train in book 6 when Harry sneaks into the Slytherin compartment, he hears Zabini tell Draco that Slughorn doesn't seem intrested in death eaters. I left a replie on the talk page too. I look forward to your response. :-)  +++$+++ :::I wanted to leave this directly on your talk page. lol The reason Slughorn rarely mentions Snape is because Snape is either A) A former death eater, or B) A current death eater. (Who knows for sure which he is). If you will recall Slughorn doesn't like to ave the children of death eaters in his Slugclub. On the train in book 6 when Harry sneaks into the Slytherin compartment, he hears Zabini tell Draco that Slughorn doesn't seem intrested in death eaters. I left a replie on the talk page too. I look forward to your response. :-) [[user:KnowledgeOfSelf|<font color=#151B8D>Knowledge<font color=#C11B17>Of<font color=#C11B17>Self</font>]] | [[user talk:KnowledgeOfSelf|<font color= #461B7E>talk</font>]]. 21:51, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

544623 +++$+++ Kscottbailey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544623 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-09 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.194609000E09 +++$+++ You're right, of course. However, I just get so tired of one person mischaracterizing a dispute as \"edit warring\", \"revert warring\", or whatever to prop their oppose, and then others jump on the pile with little analysis of their own. This kind of thing is why I would never stand for adminship, and would hesitate to nominate an editor I respect for it as well. Any editor who has made any type of [[WP:BOLD|bold]] moves stands to come in for a lot of unwarranted criticism, which can become discouraging, even to those Wikipedians with the thickest of skin.  +++$+++ You're right, of course. However, I just get so tired of one person mischaracterizing a dispute as "edit warring", "revert warring", or whatever to prop their oppose, and then others jump on the pile with little analysis of their own. This kind of thing is why I would never stand for adminship, and would hesitate to nominate an editor I respect for it as well. Any editor who has made any type of [[WP:BOLD|bold]] moves stands to come in for a lot of unwarranted criticism, which can become discouraging, even to those Wikipedians with the thickest of skin. [[User:Kscottbailey|K. Scott Bailey]] 03:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
544624 +++$+++ Kscottbailey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544623 +++$+++ 544623 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.194613380E09 +++$+++ Exactly. For [[Abraham Lincoln|example]]. [[User:GwenGale]] is placing frivolous fact tags on the Lincoln intro, demanding citations for uncontroversial statements of facts. When I gave her one, she derided the source, demanding another. I have now posted two different refs for the uncontroversial statement of fact. However, I have been brusque with her, as she richly deserves in my opinion--both for wasting my time, and injuring (however slightly) the project as a whole. I'm certain if I ever stood for adminship (which I never will), she would oppose me vigorously, even though she very much earned the brusqueness she received. Anyways, I appreciate how you are able to comport yourself in the face of similar lunacy (see the reversion of your very legit block), but that's just not me. There's a reason I self-identify as a \"Wikidragon.\" That's what I aspire to, not adminship.  +++$+++ :Exactly. For [[Abraham Lincoln|example]]. [[User:GwenGale]] is placing frivolous fact tags on the Lincoln intro, demanding citations for uncontroversial statements of facts. When I gave her one, she derided the source, demanding another. I have now posted two different refs for the uncontroversial statement of fact. However, I have been brusque with her, as she richly deserves in my opinion--both for wasting my time, and injuring (however slightly) the project as a whole. I'm certain if I ever stood for adminship (which I never will), she would oppose me vigorously, even though she very much earned the brusqueness she received. Anyways, I appreciate how you are able to comport yourself in the face of similar lunacy (see the reversion of your very legit block), but that's just not me. There's a reason I self-identify as a "Wikidragon." That's what I aspire to, not adminship. [[User:Kscottbailey|K. Scott Bailey]] 05:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

544625 +++$+++ Kscottbailey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-10 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.194681840E09 +++$+++ [[User:Gwen_Gale]] is holding forth on the talk page and at the article as well, pestering good editors to source even the most uncontroversial assertions about Lincoln, that every major biographer discusses. Then, when such sources are provided, she derides them as unreliable, or claims we're doing original research. It seems a classic example of pettifoggery, and I've disengaged a bit, letting her know that I'm not arguing with her about it anymore, and that the only time I will be engaging her is if she tries to push her POV (she claims she could source that Lincoln was \"genocidal\") into the article. I've asked one other admin to take a look at it as well, but I've appreciated your cool demeanor in our recent dealings, so I'd like you to take a look as well, if you have time. Thanks, and best regards,  +++$+++ [[User:Gwen_Gale]] is holding forth on the talk page and at the article as well, pestering good editors to source even the most uncontroversial assertions about Lincoln, that every major biographer discusses. Then, when such sources are provided, she derides them as unreliable, or claims we're doing original research. It seems a classic example of pettifoggery, and I've disengaged a bit, letting her know that I'm not arguing with her about it anymore, and that the only time I will be engaging her is if she tries to push her POV (she claims she could source that Lincoln was "genocidal") into the article. I've asked one other admin to take a look at it as well, but I've appreciated your cool demeanor in our recent dealings, so I'd like you to take a look as well, if you have time. Thanks, and best regards, [[User:Kscottbailey|K. Scott Bailey]] 00:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
544626 +++$+++ Kscottbailey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544625 +++$+++ 544625 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.194683040E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure I understand your advice. Are you saying just edit, and don't even engage at ALL with her? If so, do you think it would be out of line to simply revert her frivolous fact-tagging of uncontroversial statements?  +++$+++ :I'm not sure I understand your advice. Are you saying just edit, and don't even engage at ALL with her? If so, do you think it would be out of line to simply revert her frivolous fact-tagging of uncontroversial statements? [[User:Kscottbailey|K. Scott Bailey]] 00:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
544627 +++$+++ Kscottbailey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544625 +++$+++ 544626 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.194683640E09 +++$+++ Oh, okay, I think I see what you're saying. I've done some version of this (most of last evening, in fact), and she simply starts doing the wikipolicy alphabet thing, claiming that my sources aren't reliable, don't say what I say they're saying, or whatever. She's never once given a source that argued against any of the positions she attacks.  +++$+++ ::Oh, okay, I think I see what you're saying. I've done some version of this (most of last evening, in fact), and she simply starts doing the wikipolicy alphabet thing, claiming that my sources aren't reliable, don't say what I say they're saying, or whatever. She's never once given a source that argued against any of the positions she attacks. [[User:Kscottbailey|K. Scott Bailey]] 00:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
544628 +++$+++ Gwen Gale +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544625 +++$+++ 544627 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.194684180E09 +++$+++ I haven't edited any assertions at all into the article header. I've only asked for citations to support those which were already there.  +++$+++ :::I haven't edited any assertions at all into the article header. I've only asked for citations to support those which were already there. [[User:Gwen Gale|Gwen Gale]] 00:43, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
544629 +++$+++ Kscottbailey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544625 +++$+++ 544628 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.194684900E09 +++$+++ You'll have to deal with her, Tim. I'm too frustrated, and I'm trying to improve the article, and can't be bothered with arguing with her right now.  +++$+++ ::::You'll have to deal with her, Tim. I'm too frustrated, and I'm trying to improve the article, and can't be bothered with arguing with her right now. [[User:Kscottbailey|K. Scott Bailey]] 00:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

527678 +++$+++ JLaTondre +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-22 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.179817200E09 +++$+++ I will third this request. A Fellow of the Royal Society is a claim of notability. If you disagree with it's inclusion, it should at least go to AFD as it does not qualify as a speedy. I see you have been active since [[User:DGG|DGG]] & [[User:Newport|Newport]] have posted here. Can you please respond to those queries? Thanks. -- +++$+++ I will third this request. A Fellow of the Royal Society is a claim of notability. If you disagree with it's inclusion, it should at least go to AFD as it does not qualify as a speedy. I see you have been active since [[User:DGG|DGG]] & [[User:Newport|Newport]] have posted here. Can you please respond to those queries? Thanks. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] 00:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
527679 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527678 +++$+++ 527678 +++$+++ 2007-05-22 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.179819180E09 +++$+++ Thank you. It's appreciated. I have asked Newport to source the article. Based on a quick Google search, I don't think that should be hard for him to do. Thanks. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] 00:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)  Thanks''' +++$+++ :Thank you. It's appreciated. I have asked Newport to source the article. Based on a quick Google search, I don't think that should be hard for him to do. Thanks. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] 00:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)  Thanks'''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' 00:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

544630 +++$+++  +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544630 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-10 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.194739860E09 +++$+++ Tim, can you change the title of [[Hepatitis B Virus]] to [[Hepatitis B virus]]? GrahamColm 16:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ Tim, can you change the title of [[Hepatitis B Virus]] to [[Hepatitis B virus]]? GrahamColm 16:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
544631 +++$+++  +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544630 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.194745800E09 +++$+++ Tim, thanks once more and I forgot to thank you for your help on [[rotavirus]] thanks for that too. GrahamColm 17:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :*Tim, thanks once more and I forgot to thank you for your help on [[rotavirus]] thanks for that too. GrahamColm 17:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

20343 +++$+++ Lord Voldemort +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20343 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-26 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.138327500E09 +++$+++ On merging the Tom Riddle article with the Lord Voldemort article, I award you this [[Dark Mark]]. Mwahahahahahaha. No, seriously, it took some work, so thanks. Keep up the good work. -- +++$+++ On merging the Tom Riddle article with the Lord Voldemort article, I award you this [[Dark Mark]]. Mwahahahahahaha. No, seriously, it took some work, so thanks. Keep up the good work. --[[User:Lord Voldemort|<font color="purple">LV</font>]] <sup><font color="#3D9140">[[User talk:Lord Voldemort|(Dark Mark)]]</font></sup> 18:05, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
20344 +++$+++ Lord Voldemort +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20343 +++$+++ 20343 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.138327740E09 +++$+++ Oh, I understand, but you have done a wonderful start on this immense task, so I thought some recognition was in order. See ya. -- +++$+++ :Oh, I understand, but you have done a wonderful start on this immense task, so I thought some recognition was in order. See ya. --[[User:Lord Voldemort|<font color="purple">LV</font>]] <sup><font color="#3D9140">[[User talk:Lord Voldemort|(Dark Mark)]]</font></sup> 18:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

20345 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20345 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-26 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.138331340E09 +++$+++ For your tireless work recently on various Harry Potter articles........ Good work   [[User:Danlina| ]]<span class=\"plainlinks\" style=\"border: 1px solid #000000; padding: 1px;\"><b><font color=\"#ff0000\"> +++$+++ For your tireless work recently on various Harry Potter articles........ Good work   [[User:Danlina| ]]<span class="plainlinks" style="border: 1px solid #000000; padding: 1px;"><b><font color="#ff0000">[[User:Danlina|<font face="arial, helvetica" color="#ff0000"><b><i>Death Eater Dan</i></b></font>]]   [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]]</b></span> 19:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
20346 +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20345 +++$+++ 20345 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.138336320E09 +++$+++ This is funny, I just came to your talk page about to award you a barnstar (probably a different one) for the same thing! Congratulations! --[[User:Deathphoenix|D]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|'''e''']] +++$+++ :This is funny, I just came to your talk page about to award you a barnstar (probably a different one) for the same thing! Congratulations! --[[User:Deathphoenix|D]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|'''e''']][[User:Deathphoenix|ath]][[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''phoenix''']] 20:32, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
20347 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20345 +++$+++ 20346 +++$+++ 2006-01-26 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.138344960E09 +++$+++ Just out of intrest (because this is the first barnstar I have awarded)..... which one would you have given him, DeathPhoenix?   [[User:Danlina| ]]<span class=\"plainlinks\" style=\"border: 1px solid #000000; padding: 1px;\"><b><font color=\"#ff0000\"> +++$+++ :*Just out of intrest (because this is the first barnstar I have awarded)..... which one would you have given him, DeathPhoenix?   [[User:Danlina| ]]<span class="plainlinks" style="border: 1px solid #000000; padding: 1px;"><b><font color="#ff0000">[[User:Danlina|<font face="arial, helvetica" color="#ff0000"><b><i>Death Eater Dan</i></b></font>]]   [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]]</b></span> 22:56, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

544634 +++$+++ Random832 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544634 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.194496980E09 +++$+++ Well, the one issue I can think of is that I've taken positions in a lot of controversial policy debates. \u2014 +++$+++ Well, the one issue I can think of is that I've taken positions in a lot of controversial policy debates. —[[User talk:Random832|Random832]] 20:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
544635 +++$+++ Random832 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544634 +++$+++ 544634 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.194647400E09 +++$+++ I think I would be willing to - just out of curiosity, why me? \u2014 +++$+++ :I think I would be willing to - just out of curiosity, why me? —[[User talk:Random832|Random832]] 14:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
544636 +++$+++ Random832 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544634 +++$+++ 544635 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.194692880E09 +++$+++ \"He\" is fine. I wouldn't say blogging is necessarily something i'm really interested in - the majority of my edits to [[Dave Winer]] were in trying to resolve the dispute there rather than any significant interest in the subject of the article. \u2014 +++$+++ ::"He" is fine. I wouldn't say blogging is necessarily something i'm really interested in - the majority of my edits to [[Dave Winer]] were in trying to resolve the dispute there rather than any significant interest in the subject of the article. —[[User talk:Random832|Random832]] 03:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
544637 +++$+++ Random832 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544634 +++$+++ 544636 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.194867720E09 +++$+++ I've accepted the nomination. \u2014 +++$+++ :::I've accepted the nomination. —[[User talk:Random832|Random832]] 03:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

20348 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-27 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.138407360E09 +++$+++ Hi Beowulf, I notice you altered one of my changes. First, Tom Marvolo Riddle is a redirect, so shouldn't be used as a link, either use Tom Riddle or Lord Voldemort. I am trying to rearrange things so that tom riddle is only linked when it is explicitly only tom who is meant. Otherwise link Lord Voldemort, which includes his whole life history. Anything which is using both names so the reader knows they are the same person should go directly to Voldemort. Thaks, +++$+++ Hi Beowulf, I notice you altered one of my changes. First, Tom Marvolo Riddle is a redirect, so shouldn't be used as a link, either use Tom Riddle or Lord Voldemort. I am trying to rearrange things so that tom riddle is only linked when it is explicitly only tom who is meant. Otherwise link Lord Voldemort, which includes his whole life history. Anything which is using both names so the reader knows they are the same person should go directly to Voldemort. Thaks,[[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 16:16, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
20349 +++$+++ Beowulf314159 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20348 +++$+++ 20348 +++$+++ 2006-01-27 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.138407960E09 +++$+++ instead, but as far as the ''text'' is concerned, \"Tom Riddle\" is correct in that usage, \"Lord Voldemort\" is not. -  +++$+++ :instead, but as far as the ''text'' is concerned, "Tom Riddle" is correct in that usage, "Lord Voldemort" is not. - [[User:Beowulf314159|Beowulf314159]] 16:26, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

544638 +++$+++ Canadian Paul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-07 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.194497400E09 +++$+++ So I guess it depends on what you think. While I feel that I have learned and grown from these stressful experiences, and I do feel that I would use the tools in a productive manner, I can completely understand if people thought I should prove myself for another month or two before being nominating. Cheers,  +++$+++ So I guess it depends on what you think. While I feel that I have learned and grown from these stressful experiences, and I do feel that I would use the tools in a productive manner, I can completely understand if people thought I should prove myself for another month or two before being nominating. Cheers, [[User:Canadian Paul|CP]] 20:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
544639 +++$+++ Canadian Paul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544638 +++$+++ 544638 +++$+++ 2007-11-07 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.194498060E09 +++$+++ Would you mind if I thought about it and let you know by the weekend? By the way, that's one hell of a cute cat, and the name just seals the deal! Cheers,  +++$+++ :Would you mind if I thought about it and let you know by the weekend? By the way, that's one hell of a cute cat, and the name just seals the deal! Cheers, [[User:Canadian Paul|CP]] 21:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

20351 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-16 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.140127020E09 +++$+++ Apologies for the confusing deletion log, I've fixed it now. I think the objections were both to the title and to the material. Many of the deleters made clear they didn't think the material needed to stand alone at all, at least not in such minute detail. I'm not sure that more than one of the deleters said it was necessarily all included anywhere else, although many indicated that a more efficient version of it could be. If you want to know where someone thinks it has been merged to, you should ask them rather than me, I think. I can userfy it for you, if you'd like to see the material again (but note that this wouldn't be a license to recreate the material in article space). - +++$+++ Apologies for the confusing deletion log, I've fixed it now. I think the objections were both to the title and to the material. Many of the deleters made clear they didn't think the material needed to stand alone at all, at least not in such minute detail. I'm not sure that more than one of the deleters said it was necessarily all included anywhere else, although many indicated that a more efficient version of it could be. If you want to know where someone thinks it has been merged to, you should ask them rather than me, I think. I can userfy it for you, if you'd like to see the material again (but note that this wouldn't be a license to recreate the material in article space). -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Splash|talk]]</sup></small> 13:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
20352 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20351 +++$+++ 20351 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.140151320E09 +++$+++ I have moved the article to [[User:Sandpiper\/Battle of Hogwarts]]. Standard cautions about recreating deleted material apply. Also remember that, if you should merge parts of it, you need to provide a 'credit' in your edit summary back to the subpage, and to retain the subpage. - +++$+++ :I have moved the article to [[User:Sandpiper/Battle of Hogwarts]]. Standard cautions about recreating deleted material apply. Also remember that, if you should merge parts of it, you need to provide a 'credit' in your edit summary back to the subpage, and to retain the subpage. -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Splash|talk]]</sup></small> 20:42, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
20353 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20351 +++$+++ 20352 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.140153600E09 +++$+++ Since the GFDL insists on attribution of authors, if you move the work in the article to elsewhere, we need to be able to track back to its authors, hence the suggestion of a link back to the usersubpage in the edit summary, and the consequent need to retain the subpage. It's the same as the issue of merging and deleting. - +++$+++ ::Since the GFDL insists on attribution of authors, if you move the work in the article to elsewhere, we need to be able to track back to its authors, hence the suggestion of a link back to the usersubpage in the edit summary, and the consequent need to retain the subpage. It's the same as the issue of merging and deleting. -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Splash|talk]]</sup></small> 21:20, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
20354 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20351 +++$+++ 20353 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.140154380E09 +++$+++ We do not merge and delete, since this would remove the revision history and the attribution that the GFDL insists we keep. It is hypothetically possible to copy the history to the talk page, but with a multi-article merge this would be either difficult or impossible. Which is all to say that you need to retain the userfied article if you merge it anywhere for GFDL purposes. - +++$+++ :::We do not merge and delete, since this would remove the revision history and the attribution that the GFDL insists we keep. It is hypothetically possible to copy the history to the talk page, but with a multi-article merge this would be either difficult or impossible. Which is all to say that you need to retain the userfied article if you merge it anywhere for GFDL purposes. -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Splash|talk]]</sup></small> 21:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
20355 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20351 +++$+++ 20354 +++$+++ 2006-02-16 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.140159900E09 +++$+++ I've seen that document somewhere too, but it certainly isn't a provision in the text of the GFDL. No, we do not ever merge and delete, though people on AfD sometimes say we should. There request to delete is simply passed over. I suppose occasionally an admin might do a history merge or paste histories onto talk pages, but these are both very much the exception rather than the rule. - +++$+++ ::::I've seen that document somewhere too, but it certainly isn't a provision in the text of the GFDL. No, we do not ever merge and delete, though people on AfD sometimes say we should. There request to delete is simply passed over. I suppose occasionally an admin might do a history merge or paste histories onto talk pages, but these are both very much the exception rather than the rule. -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Splash|talk]]</sup></small> 23:05, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
20356 +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20351 +++$+++ 20355 +++$+++ 2006-02-17 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.140164040E09 +++$+++ Yes, it does. Redirects are cheap, I guess. - +++$+++ :::::Yes, it does. Redirects are cheap, I guess. -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Splash|talk]]</sup></small> 00:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

282497 +++$+++ 86.66.224.119 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-02 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.233624180E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/86.66.224.119|86.66.224.119]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/86.66.224.119|86.66.224.119]] ([[User talk:86.66.224.119|talk]]) 17:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
282498 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282497 +++$+++ 282497 +++$+++ 2009-02-03 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.233689280E09 +++$+++ '''REPLY:''' Hi Marian! You are, of course, most welcome to use the photo. My father, who has now passed away, took it years ago and he would have been thrilled to know it is being used and others are enjoying it. I hope you find this reply - I tried to reply on your MySpace page but could not find out how to do it, and you don't have a Wikipedia Talk page yet. Please let me know if you get this message - if I don't hear from you in a while I will try to contact you again through MySpace. Cheers and all best wishes,  +++$+++ :'''REPLY:''' Hi Marian! You are, of course, most welcome to use the photo. My father, who has now passed away, took it years ago and he would have been thrilled to know it is being used and others are enjoying it. I hope you find this reply - I tried to reply on your MySpace page but could not find out how to do it, and you don't have a Wikipedia Talk page yet. Please let me know if you get this message - if I don't hear from you in a while I will try to contact you again through MySpace. Cheers and all best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 11:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

571371 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.168883520E09 +++$+++ Hi Dfrg.msc, In case you're unaware, it is bad Wikipedia etiquette to use AWB for solely minor edits like moving stub notices and removing blank lines.  See [[Wikipedia:AWB]]: \"Avoid making insignificant minor edits such as only adding or removing some white space, moving a stub tag, converting some HTML to Unicode, removing underscores from links (unless they are bad links), or something equally trivial. This is because it wastes resources and clogs up watch lists.\"  AWB is an excellent tool which can do these things but ideally should do them while also doing things like (say) find\/replace type edits.  Clogging other users' watchlists with hundreds of these minor edits gets them annoyed and is disrespectful.  Regards &mdash; +++$+++ Hi Dfrg.msc, In case you're unaware, it is bad Wikipedia etiquette to use AWB for solely minor edits like moving stub notices and removing blank lines.  See [[Wikipedia:AWB]]: "Avoid making insignificant minor edits such as only adding or removing some white space, moving a stub tag, converting some HTML to Unicode, removing underscores from links (unless they are bad links), or something equally trivial. This is because it wastes resources and clogs up watch lists."  AWB is an excellent tool which can do these things but ideally should do them while also doing things like (say) find/replace type edits.  Clogging other users' watchlists with hundreds of these minor edits gets them annoyed and is disrespectful.  Regards &mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 09:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
571372 +++$+++ HeartofaDog +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571371 +++$+++ 571371 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 12:42:00 +++$+++ 1.168893720E09 +++$+++ I second that in spades. It's also very close to vandalism to remove valid disambiguation links. The word \"trigger-happy\" springs to mind.  +++$+++ :I second that in spades. It's also very close to vandalism to remove valid disambiguation links. The word "trigger-happy" springs to mind. [[User:HeartofaDog|HeartofaDog]] 12:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

544645 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-12 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.194930060E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, do you think it's time I withdrew? The question in my mind is: would you still support me? If, as nominator, you've found yourself feeling that I'm untrustworthy, then it's time to shut it down. I guess three months is no time at all...  +++$+++ Hi Tim, do you think it's time I withdrew? The question in my mind is: would you still support me? If, as nominator, you've found yourself feeling that I'm untrustworthy, then it's time to shut it down. I guess three months is no time at all... [[User:VanTucky|'''Van<span style="color:#FF4F00">Tucky</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:VanTucky|Talk]]</sup> 21:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
544646 +++$+++ SqueakBox +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544645 +++$+++ 544645 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.194932220E09 +++$+++ IMO your Rfa shows all the worst traits of Rfas and why the whole system needs overhauling and I don't believe there is anything there that would indicate you should not be an admin. Thanks,  +++$+++ :IMO your Rfa shows all the worst traits of Rfas and why the whole system needs overhauling and I don't believe there is anything there that would indicate you should not be an admin. Thanks, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 21:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

20358 +++$+++ Morven +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-18 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.140327420E09 +++$+++ I reverted back your reinsertion of the two pictures on [[4-6-0]].  I feel that on a page about a wheel arrangement, pictures that are so dark the wheels cannot be seen are rather pointless.  When there are already pictures in the article that don't have that flaw, I don't believe we should keep up bad pictures - it would be different if we had no other pictures to illustrate it.  +++$+++ I reverted back your reinsertion of the two pictures on [[4-6-0]].  I feel that on a page about a wheel arrangement, pictures that are so dark the wheels cannot be seen are rather pointless.  When there are already pictures in the article that don't have that flaw, I don't believe we should keep up bad pictures - it would be different if we had no other pictures to illustrate it. [[User:Morven|Matthew Brown (Morven)]] ([[User talk:Morven|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Morven|C]]) 21:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
20359 +++$+++ Morven +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20358 +++$+++ 20358 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.140328980E09 +++$+++ Ah, now I see your point - seeing beyond 4-6-0 as a wheel arrangement and showing it as a ''type''.  Fortunately most North American 4-6-0s predate 1923 (public domain cut off point in the US) and thus photos will be quite available, I hope.  I'll see what else I can find, too, and if you can see if those pictures can be given a bit more clarity, that'll be good too.  +++$+++ :Ah, now I see your point - seeing beyond 4-6-0 as a wheel arrangement and showing it as a ''type''.  Fortunately most North American 4-6-0s predate 1923 (public domain cut off point in the US) and thus photos will be quite available, I hope.  I'll see what else I can find, too, and if you can see if those pictures can be given a bit more clarity, that'll be good too. [[User:Morven|Matthew Brown (Morven)]] ([[User talk:Morven|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Morven|C]]) 22:03, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
20360 +++$+++ Duncharris +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20358 +++$+++ 20359 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.140329700E09 +++$+++ Or more to the point, I can (usually) get good quality photographs of most engines; go to http:\/\/fotopic.net\/ and look for black five or hall class or the number of a preserved engine.  Now, Stowe is a bit difficult to find, but please consider quality.  If photos aren't up to scratch, then they'll be ignored, especially if we have one of the same engine which is better.  Therefore, I do recommend if you want to upload your photos on the net though you use http:\/\/fotopic.net\/ as a vehicle, not Wikipedia.  And like Morven says, contemporary photographs are much more useful than modern photographs.  Please. &mdash;  +++$+++ :: Or more to the point, I can (usually) get good quality photographs of most engines; go to http://fotopic.net/ and look for black five or hall class or the number of a preserved engine.  Now, Stowe is a bit difficult to find, but please consider quality.  If photos aren't up to scratch, then they'll be ignored, especially if we have one of the same engine which is better.  Therefore, I do recommend if you want to upload your photos on the net though you use http://fotopic.net/ as a vehicle, not Wikipedia.  And like Morven says, contemporary photographs are much more useful than modern photographs.  Please. &mdash; [[user:Duncharris|Dunc]]|[[User talk:duncharris|&#9786;]] 22:15, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
20361 +++$+++ Morven +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20358 +++$+++ 20359 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.140331080E09 +++$+++ I think [[4-6-0]] should be a general history\/description of the type - surviving examples should go into a supplementary list or category.  The article at present is badly US-centric and needs that to be fixed, of course.  4-6-0s were popular in North America in the late 19th and early 20th century, before being supplanted by 4-6-2s and other larger power.  Britain probably stuck to the type the hardest, especially the GWR.  German use paralleled the American; Pacifics took over in the most part.  I think there was a fair amount of use in France, Belgium et al.  +++$+++ ::I think [[4-6-0]] should be a general history/description of the type - surviving examples should go into a supplementary list or category.  The article at present is badly US-centric and needs that to be fixed, of course.  4-6-0s were popular in North America in the late 19th and early 20th century, before being supplanted by 4-6-2s and other larger power.  Britain probably stuck to the type the hardest, especially the GWR.  German use paralleled the American; Pacifics took over in the most part.  I think there was a fair amount of use in France, Belgium et al. [[User:Morven|Matthew Brown (Morven)]] ([[User talk:Morven|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Morven|C]]) 22:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
20362 +++$+++ Morven +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20358 +++$+++ 20361 +++$+++ 2006-02-19 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.140336840E09 +++$+++ At some point, we need articles on the evolution of the steam locomotive in each major nation and some articles comparing them; the British and American way of doing things was rather different indeed, with German often somewhere in between and France just wierd.  +++$+++ :::At some point, we need articles on the evolution of the steam locomotive in each major nation and some articles comparing them; the British and American way of doing things was rather different indeed, with German often somewhere in between and France just wierd. [[User:Morven|Matthew Brown (Morven)]] ([[User talk:Morven|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Morven|C]]) 00:14, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

265537 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-01 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.162454160E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] 23:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
265538 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265537 +++$+++ 265537 +++$+++ 2006-11-04 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.162686420E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] 16:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
265539 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265537 +++$+++ 265538 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.162768860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] 15:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
265540 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265537 +++$+++ 265539 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.162777620E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] 17:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
265541 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265537 +++$+++ 265539 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.162777980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] 17:53, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
265542 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265537 +++$+++ 265541 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.162794660E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] 22:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
265543 +++$+++ Derek R Bullamore +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265537 +++$+++ 265542 +++$+++ 2006-11-06 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.162873560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :::::[[User:Derek R Bullamore|Derek R Bullamore]] 20:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

544649 +++$+++  +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-13 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.195014960E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, I've done a lot of work on [[Hepatitis B virus]] (mainly adding my homemade diagrams), I'm not quite finished with it, but could you have a look? I'm not sure if it needs a new section on liver carcinoma, it might make the article too long or too scary to those folk who have been infected at some time. I hope you had a good break. Who looked after the cat? --GrahamColm 20:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ Hi Tim, I've done a lot of work on [[Hepatitis B virus]] (mainly adding my homemade diagrams), I'm not quite finished with it, but could you have a look? I'm not sure if it needs a new section on liver carcinoma, it might make the article too long or too scary to those folk who have been infected at some time. I hope you had a good break. Who looked after the cat? --GrahamColm 20:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
544650 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544649 +++$+++ 544649 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.195024440E09 +++$+++ That's okay Tim, no worries. If you want to check back with me about renomination six months from now, that would be fine.  +++$+++ *That's okay Tim, no worries. If you want to check back with me about renomination six months from now, that would be fine. [[User:VanTucky|'''Van<span style="color:#FF4F00">Tucky</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:VanTucky|Talk]]</sup> 23:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

282507 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-03 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.233720420E09 +++$+++ Just looking through the German archives the potential for coverage just gets mind boggling if we go back into a different time and space. Undoubtedly there are potentially thousands of biographies and articles that could be written on people from a hundreds of different eras that are unkown to \"the west\" but were important cabinet members or people during their time and place. For instance go back to 18th century Tibet I am willing to bet there are tens of articles that could be written on important monks or abbots which would make fascinating articles. I know we have the main lineage successors started but if you try to get into the time period or place which I think is what wikipedia should strive to do it is astounding what we could do eventually. Thats what makes wikipedia that little more special I think, it is up to us to make these topics notable and present them to \"the west\". It really affects me when I think how many volumes of books were burned during the Chinese invasion in thousands of monasteries. Monasteries were the centers for information in Tibet weren't they. Luckily the Tibetan Museum in India has salvaged some information but in relation to what undounbtedly existed in all the ancient Tibetan manuscriupts and archives it is nothing at all.   +++$+++ Just looking through the German archives the potential for coverage just gets mind boggling if we go back into a different time and space. Undoubtedly there are potentially thousands of biographies and articles that could be written on people from a hundreds of different eras that are unkown to "the west" but were important cabinet members or people during their time and place. For instance go back to 18th century Tibet I am willing to bet there are tens of articles that could be written on important monks or abbots which would make fascinating articles. I know we have the main lineage successors started but if you try to get into the time period or place which I think is what wikipedia should strive to do it is astounding what we could do eventually. Thats what makes wikipedia that little more special I think, it is up to us to make these topics notable and present them to "the west". It really affects me when I think how many volumes of books were burned during the Chinese invasion in thousands of monasteries. Monasteries were the centers for information in Tibet weren't they. Luckily the Tibetan Museum in India has salvaged some information but in relation to what undounbtedly existed in all the ancient Tibetan manuscriupts and archives it is nothing at all.  [[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 20:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
282508 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282507 +++$+++ 282507 +++$+++ 2009-02-04 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.233744420E09 +++$+++ '''REPLY''' WOW! I am speechless! Looks like we could spend weeks just adding images to current articles and providing captions before we get onto any new articles. Will do what I can when I can. Thanks so much for pointing out this amazing treasure box to me. Cheers,  +++$+++ :'''REPLY''' WOW! I am speechless! Looks like we could spend weeks just adding images to current articles and providing captions before we get onto any new articles. Will do what I can when I can. Thanks so much for pointing out this amazing treasure box to me. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 02:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

282509 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282509 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-04 10:07:00 +++$+++ 1.233770820E09 +++$+++ I know, the images mean a lot to me also because it pictures Tibet as Tibet not after it was brutally robbed of its independence. Did you by the way have any info on [[Tsarong Dzasa]] in your books to add? Have you heard of him? I started [[Trimon]] too a while back,which I'd like to expand in due course if possible; I'd like to see more biographies started on Tibetan cabinet leaders from earlier times indeed from today too but I am particularly fascinated by the older material.  +++$+++ I know, the images mean a lot to me also because it pictures Tibet as Tibet not after it was brutally robbed of its independence. Did you by the way have any info on [[Tsarong Dzasa]] in your books to add? Have you heard of him? I started [[Trimon]] too a while back,which I'd like to expand in due course if possible; I'd like to see more biographies started on Tibetan cabinet leaders from earlier times indeed from today too but I am particularly fascinated by the older material. [[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 10:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
282510 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282509 +++$+++ 282509 +++$+++ 2009-02-04 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.233819660E09 +++$+++ Fantastic article on Tsarong Dzasa, Dr. Blofeld! I haven't found anything about him or Timon yet - but I have a lot of old books and papers to go through - will try to do this some time soon. I had lots of fun yesterday just adding photos from the collection to various articles (and making English captions for them and a few changes to the articles where I thought they were needed). Cheers,  +++$+++ :Fantastic article on Tsarong Dzasa, Dr. Blofeld! I haven't found anything about him or Timon yet - but I have a lot of old books and papers to go through - will try to do this some time soon. I had lots of fun yesterday just adding photos from the collection to various articles (and making English captions for them and a few changes to the articles where I thought they were needed). Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 23:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

544654 +++$+++ Tom Schmal +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544654 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-15 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.195125960E09 +++$+++ Tim What steps do you recommend I take to get a fair shake on this?  should I just add the letter above to the discussion page of LCA (what's left of it)?  There is not much traffic there, what should I expect?  +++$+++ Tim What steps do you recommend I take to get a fair shake on this?  should I just add the letter above to the discussion page of LCA (what's left of it)?  There is not much traffic there, what should I expect? [[User:Tom Schmal|Tom Schmal]] 03:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
544655 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544654 +++$+++ 544654 +++$+++ 2007-11-14 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.195109700E09 +++$+++ I agree with you very much that the current attitude towards adminship is a problem for Wikipedia.  I think you've hit the nail on the head. -- +++$+++ : I agree with you very much that the current attitude towards adminship is a problem for Wikipedia.  I think you've hit the nail on the head. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 22:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
544656 +++$+++ Lid +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544654 +++$+++ 544654 +++$+++ 2007-11-14 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.195109940E09 +++$+++ Your request is one I understand however I see flaws in it, in that the \"chain\" may create a... well... [[WP:CABAL|cabal]] of people in the chain. Apart from which I would need to find these three users and the only user who springs immediately to mind is one I have in the past concluded would probably not pass. &ndash;&ndash; ''' +++$+++ :Your request is one I understand however I see flaws in it, in that the "chain" may create a... well... [[WP:CABAL|cabal]] of people in the chain. Apart from which I would need to find these three users and the only user who springs immediately to mind is one I have in the past concluded would probably not pass. &ndash;&ndash; '''[[User:Lid|Lid]]'''<sup><small>([[User talk:Lid|Talk]])</small></sup> 22:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
544657 +++$+++ Lid +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544654 +++$+++ 544656 +++$+++ 2007-11-14 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.195110240E09 +++$+++ Amusingly one of the people I was considering [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Nikki311|just had this happen]]. &ndash;&ndash; ''' +++$+++ ::Amusingly one of the people I was considering [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nikki311|just had this happen]]. &ndash;&ndash; '''[[User:Lid|Lid]]'''<sup><small>([[User talk:Lid|Talk]])</small></sup> 23:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

419672 +++$+++ Wspencer11 +++$+++ Antandrus +++$+++ 419672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-01 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.309570680E09 +++$+++ Hi there! You will be delighted to know that a revert war is going on in the Holst article. -- +++$+++ Hi there! You will be delighted to know that a revert war is going on in the Holst article. --[[User:Wspencer11|Wspencer11]] [[User talk:Wspencer11|(talk to me...)]] 18:38, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
419673 +++$+++ Antandrus +++$+++ Antandrus +++$+++ 419672 +++$+++ 419672 +++$+++ 2011-07-01 19:00:00 +++$+++ 1.309572000E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I know, I'm the one who \"started\" it.  If you have an opinion, by all means weigh in on the article's talk page.  Cheers,  +++$+++ :Yeah, I know, I'm the one who "started" it.  If you have an opinion, by all means weigh in on the article's talk page.  Cheers, [[User:Antandrus|Antandrus ]] [[User_talk:Antandrus|(talk)]] 19:00, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

282513 +++$+++ Ravichandar84 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282513 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-07 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.234056720E09 +++$+++ <\/div>-<font color=\"maroon\" size=\"4\" face=\"Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ </div>-<font color="maroon" size="4" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Ravichandar84|Ravichandar]]</font><sub><font color="aqua" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User talk:Ravichandar84|My coffee shop]]</font></sub> 17:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
282514 +++$+++ Ravichandar84 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282513 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.234294380E09 +++$+++ No mention. Take care! Cheers! :-)-<font color=\"maroon\" size=\"4\" face=\"Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ :: No mention. Take care! Cheers! :-)-<font color="maroon" size="4" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Ravichandar84|Ravichandar]]</font><sub><font color="aqua" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User talk:Ravichandar84|My coffee shop]]</font></sub> 11:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
282515 +++$+++ Ravichandar84 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282513 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-10 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.234307460E09 +++$+++ Speaking of the [[Silk Route]], I just love [[Henry Yule]]'s translation of [[Marco Polo]]. That's one fine book I've read again and again.-<font color=\"maroon\" size=\"4\" face=\"Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ :: Speaking of the [[Silk Route]], I just love [[Henry Yule]]'s translation of [[Marco Polo]]. That's one fine book I've read again and again.-<font color="maroon" size="4" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Ravichandar84|Ravichandar]]</font><sub><font color="aqua" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User talk:Ravichandar84|My coffee shop]]</font></sub> 15:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
282516 +++$+++ Ravichandar84 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282513 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-11 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.234360860E09 +++$+++ As far as the [[Pandyas]] are concerned, I believe that Pandyas were often confounded with the [[Pandavas]], as in [[Arrian]]'s ''[[Indica (Arrian)|Indica]]''. However, the kingdom of Panyue mentioned in the ''Weilue'', appears in most probability, to be the kingdom of the Pandyas. However, as there is little evidence of any commerce between the ancient South Indians and [[China]] prior to the 10th and 11th centuries AD when the [[Medieval Cholas]] were at the zenith of their power, the interactions in the 3rd century CE  must've been limited to occasional diplomatic missions or voyages of exploration.-<font color=\"maroon\" size=\"4\" face=\"Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ ::: As far as the [[Pandyas]] are concerned, I believe that Pandyas were often confounded with the [[Pandavas]], as in [[Arrian]]'s ''[[Indica (Arrian)|Indica]]''. However, the kingdom of Panyue mentioned in the ''Weilue'', appears in most probability, to be the kingdom of the Pandyas. However, as there is little evidence of any commerce between the ancient South Indians and [[China]] prior to the 10th and 11th centuries AD when the [[Medieval Cholas]] were at the zenith of their power, the interactions in the 3rd century CE  must've been limited to occasional diplomatic missions or voyages of exploration.-<font color="maroon" size="4" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Ravichandar84|Ravichandar]]</font><sub><font color="aqua" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User talk:Ravichandar84|My coffee shop]]</font></sub> 06:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
282517 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282513 +++$+++ 282513 +++$+++ 2009-02-11 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.234379940E09 +++$+++ Hi again, Ravi! Thanks for your comments. In fact there is indeed some evidence for trade between southern and eastern India and China in the late centuries BCE to the early centuries CE. Although it is not extensive, it seems to me quite unequivocal. There are Chinese records of merchants from the Roman Empire reaching China by sea (and I am sure you are already well aware of the extensive trade between the Roman Empire and southeastern India and Sri Lanka around (and after) the turn of the Common Era). It would be strange if \"Roman\" merchants were visiting both southern India and China at the same period without any commercial contact between the latter two countries.  However, I am too sore and tired to go into all this in detail tonight. If you wish, I could send you info later. All best wishes,  +++$+++ :Hi again, Ravi! Thanks for your comments. In fact there is indeed some evidence for trade between southern and eastern India and China in the late centuries BCE to the early centuries CE. Although it is not extensive, it seems to me quite unequivocal. There are Chinese records of merchants from the Roman Empire reaching China by sea (and I am sure you are already well aware of the extensive trade between the Roman Empire and southeastern India and Sri Lanka around (and after) the turn of the Common Era). It would be strange if "Roman" merchants were visiting both southern India and China at the same period without any commercial contact between the latter two countries.  However, I am too sore and tired to go into all this in detail tonight. If you wish, I could send you info later. All best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 11:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
282518 +++$+++ Ravichandar84 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282513 +++$+++ 282517 +++$+++ 2009-02-11 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.234384080E09 +++$+++ There is extensive evidence to prove that trade was conducted between Rome and South India. There were Roman coins, etc.; however, there hasn't been any significant discovery in South India, of artifacts from 3rd century China. Yeah, if at all there was sea trade between Rome and China, then sailors ought to have stopped in S. India on their way.-<font color=\"maroon\" size=\"4\" face=\"Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ :: There is extensive evidence to prove that trade was conducted between Rome and South India. There were Roman coins, etc.; however, there hasn't been any significant discovery in South India, of artifacts from 3rd century China. Yeah, if at all there was sea trade between Rome and China, then sailors ought to have stopped in S. India on their way.-<font color="maroon" size="4" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Ravichandar84|Ravichandar]]</font><sub><font color="aqua" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User talk:Ravichandar84|My coffee shop]]</font></sub> 12:28, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

544660 +++$+++ ArielGold +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-15 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.195197720E09 +++$+++ For the help reverting edits by [[User:Mooroonic]]. What do you think of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:ArielGold&diff=prev&oldid=171770669 this] edit that was done immediately after the block? That's a longer standing editor, but I'm unsure why they would do such an edit, without any text explaining it, so soon after the spree of templating by the blocked editor. What are your thoughts on it? (And P.S., your kitty Loki '''is''' adorable!) <small> +++$+++ For the help reverting edits by [[User:Mooroonic]]. What do you think of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ArielGold&diff=prev&oldid=171770669 this] edit that was done immediately after the block? That's a longer standing editor, but I'm unsure why they would do such an edit, without any text explaining it, so soon after the spree of templating by the blocked editor. What are your thoughts on it? (And P.S., your kitty Loki '''is''' adorable!) <small>[[user:ArielGold|<font color="8B00FF">'''Ariel'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/ArielGold|<font color="F64A8A">♥</font>]][[User_talk:ArielGold|<font color="007FFF">'''Gold'''</font>]]</small> 23:22, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
544661 +++$+++ ArielGold +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544660 +++$+++ 544660 +++$+++ 2007-11-15 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.195198140E09 +++$+++ Yeah, my first impression was a bit too much of a coincidence, lol. I just removed it, but didn't feel it warranted any kind of notice, so no big deal. Humor '''is''' a good thing, I think. [[Image:Face-wink.svg|20px]] <small> +++$+++ :Yeah, my first impression was a bit too much of a coincidence, lol. I just removed it, but didn't feel it warranted any kind of notice, so no big deal. Humor '''is''' a good thing, I think. [[Image:Face-wink.svg|20px]] <small>[[user:ArielGold|<font color="8B00FF">'''Ariel'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/ArielGold|<font color="F64A8A">♥</font>]][[User_talk:ArielGold|<font color="007FFF">'''Gold'''</font>]]</small> 23:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
544662 +++$+++ ArielGold +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544660 +++$+++ 544661 +++$+++ 2007-11-15 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.195198200E09 +++$+++ P.S. Thank you again for your speedy reaction to the above situation. You beat me to most of the reverts, lol. <small> +++$+++ ::P.S. Thank you again for your speedy reaction to the above situation. You beat me to most of the reverts, lol. <small>[[user:ArielGold|<font color="8B00FF">'''Ariel'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/ArielGold|<font color="F64A8A">♥</font>]][[User_talk:ArielGold|<font color="007FFF">'''Gold'''</font>]]</small> 23:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

20374 +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-19 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.148072760E09 +++$+++ I took a quick look at the above link and only found discussion about the new DADA teacher in HBP and how he will be someone who has a magic eye and be able to face down Draco Malfoy. Could you give me a small passage of text to search for to find the area where JKR says the newest Hogwarts teacher will come from Harry's class? Thanks,  +++$+++ I took a quick look at the above link and only found discussion about the new DADA teacher in HBP and how he will be someone who has a magic eye and be able to face down Draco Malfoy. Could you give me a small passage of text to search for to find the area where JKR says the newest Hogwarts teacher will come from Harry's class? Thanks, [[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]] [[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''ʕ''']] 14:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
20375 +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20374 +++$+++ 20374 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 15:46:00 +++$+++ 1.148078760E09 +++$+++ Ah, that's right, now I remember the quote. Danke for the information! -- +++$+++ :Ah, that's right, now I remember the quote. Danke for the information! --[[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]] [[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''ʕ''']] 15:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

282519 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282519 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-14 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.234681620E09 +++$+++ Dear Ravi. I have just found my note on Indian contact with China by sea during the 2nd century CE and I thought it might be of some interest to you. Although all the contacts are mentioned as \"embassies,\" it seems probable that they would have come on merchant ships and that there would have been far more visits by merchant ships without embassies which would, therefore, not have been recorded in the Chinese records. Anyway, here is the quote from my notes: \"There are records of envoys from 'India' in 159 and 161 CE travelling by sea via the Han prefecture of Rinan (on the central Vietnamese coast) to China. Others from \u201cbeyond the barrier\u201d arrived in 173 CE and 183 CE. See ''The Roman Empire in Chinese Sources''. (1996). D.D. Leslie and K. H. J. Gardiner , p. 153, and n. 50. There are some indications that these embassies may have been sent by Saka satraps in Gujarat rather than from the Kushans, see ibid. p. 137.\" I should add that if ships were travelling from the northwest coast of India to China, it is very likely indeed that ships would also have been sailing to China from southeastern India, and the product lists in the 3rd century ''Weil\xfce'' would seem to indicate this as well. Cheers,  +++$+++ Dear Ravi. I have just found my note on Indian contact with China by sea during the 2nd century CE and I thought it might be of some interest to you. Although all the contacts are mentioned as "embassies," it seems probable that they would have come on merchant ships and that there would have been far more visits by merchant ships without embassies which would, therefore, not have been recorded in the Chinese records. Anyway, here is the quote from my notes: "There are records of envoys from 'India' in 159 and 161 CE travelling by sea via the Han prefecture of Rinan (on the central Vietnamese coast) to China. Others from “beyond the barrier” arrived in 173 CE and 183 CE. See ''The Roman Empire in Chinese Sources''. (1996). D.D. Leslie and K. H. J. Gardiner , p. 153, and n. 50. There are some indications that these embassies may have been sent by Saka satraps in Gujarat rather than from the Kushans, see ibid. p. 137." I should add that if ships were travelling from the northwest coast of India to China, it is very likely indeed that ships would also have been sailing to China from southeastern India, and the product lists in the 3rd century ''Weilüe'' would seem to indicate this as well. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 23:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
282520 +++$+++ Ravichandar84 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282519 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-15 06:32:00 +++$+++ 1.234708320E09 +++$+++ This is truly interesting. Well, let me search some Indian sources if there is any mention of trade with [[China]]. Well, do keep me updated. I would like to know more-<font color=\"maroon\" size=\"4\" face=\"Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ :: This is truly interesting. Well, let me search some Indian sources if there is any mention of trade with [[China]]. Well, do keep me updated. I would like to know more-<font color="maroon" size="4" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Ravichandar84|Ravichandar]]</font><sub><font color="aqua" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User talk:Ravichandar84|My coffee shop]]</font></sub> 06:32, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

20376 +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20376 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-26 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.148671140E09 +++$+++ hahaha... so how do you feel about being neutral? (answer: whatever) -- +++$+++ hahaha... so how do you feel about being neutral? (answer: whatever) --[[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]] [[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''ʕ''']] 12:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
20377 +++$+++ Deathphoenix +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20376 +++$+++ 20376 +++$+++ 2006-05-26 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.148678520E09 +++$+++ It must hurt. ;-) -- +++$+++ :It must hurt. ;-) --[[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]] [[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''ʕ''']] 14:22, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

544665 +++$+++ Derek.cashman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544665 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-16 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.195232880E09 +++$+++ Also, as far as your [joke] question: \"What might the main thermodynamic determinants be for an observation of GC-bias in a DNA-small molecule interaction?\" The primary reason for this is that the energy required for unstacking the GC base pairs is significantly less than AT base pairs. It simply costs less energetically to open the intercalation cavity. Cheers!  +++$+++ Also, as far as your [joke] question: "What might the main thermodynamic determinants be for an observation of GC-bias in a DNA-small molecule interaction?" The primary reason for this is that the energy required for unstacking the GC base pairs is significantly less than AT base pairs. It simply costs less energetically to open the intercalation cavity. Cheers! [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] 09:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
544666 +++$+++ Derek.cashman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544665 +++$+++ 544665 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.195304760E09 +++$+++ In retrospect, now might now have been the best time to do this anyway. I'm actually getting ready to move across the country to [[Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania]], to begin a new position at the [[University of Pittsburgh]]. So maybe a couple of more months is just what I need before going for another [[WP:RfA]]. Cheers!  +++$+++ :In retrospect, now might now have been the best time to do this anyway. I'm actually getting ready to move across the country to [[Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania]], to begin a new position at the [[University of Pittsburgh]]. So maybe a couple of more months is just what I need before going for another [[WP:RfA]]. Cheers! [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 05:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

568066 +++$+++ GlassCobra +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568066 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-14 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.216101900E09 +++$+++ Hi there NHRHS, I came to enlist your help. If you would, take a look at [[User talk:Xenocidic#User:Eatpeaches\/Kate McAuliffe]] and [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Llamadog903]] (now closed); looks like a sleeper sock has re-awakened. However, their contributions haven't been entirely negative, as you can see from [[Special:Contributions\/Eatpeaches]]. Acalamari recommended that we ask you for your opinion. Thanks!  +++$+++ Hi there NHRHS, I came to enlist your help. If you would, take a look at [[User talk:Xenocidic#User:Eatpeaches/Kate McAuliffe]] and [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Llamadog903]] (now closed); looks like a sleeper sock has re-awakened. However, their contributions haven't been entirely negative, as you can see from [[Special:Contributions/Eatpeaches]]. Acalamari recommended that we ask you for your opinion. Thanks! [[User:GlassCobra|<font color="0000FF">Glass</font>]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|<font color="0000FF">Cobra</font>]]''' 23:05, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
568067 +++$+++  +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568066 +++$+++ 568066 +++$+++ 2008-07-16 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.216217580E09 +++$+++ Hi there 116.15.149.15. There is no problem with the unprotection of the user page. It is in no way out of line, the page has been protected long enough and there has been no subsequent vandalism since. If you have any further problems, please [[User talk:E|leave me a message]] rather than comment here. &mdash;  +++$+++ :Hi there 116.15.149.15. There is no problem with the unprotection of the user page. It is in no way out of line, the page has been protected long enough and there has been no subsequent vandalism since. If you have any further problems, please [[User talk:E|leave me a message]] rather than comment here. &mdash; [[User:E|<span style="color:#003366;font-weight:bold">E</span>]] <span style="color:#ED9121">↗[[User talk:E|<sup>T</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/E|<sup>C</sup>]][[Wikipedia:BAG|<sup>B</sup>]]</span> 07:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
568068 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568066 +++$+++ 568067 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.216701840E09 +++$+++ I also have no problem with unprotection, but once vandalism gets too serious and out of control, then I will request semi-protection again. <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;background:red;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::I also have no problem with unprotection, but once vandalism gets too serious and out of control, then I will request semi-protection again. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;background:red;padding:1px;">[[User:NHRHS2010|<b>NHRHS2010</b>]] | [[User_talk:NHRHS2010|<font style="color:black;background:red;">&nbsp;Talk to me&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 21:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

282523 +++$+++ Ravichandar84 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-19 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.235047620E09 +++$+++ Interesting coincidence! I logged in today to message you something which I had found and I found a message from you on my talk page.:-) I'll have a look at it now-<font color=\"maroon\" size=\"4\" face=\"Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ Interesting coincidence! I logged in today to message you something which I had found and I found a message from you on my talk page.:-) I'll have a look at it now-<font color="maroon" size="4" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Ravichandar84|Ravichandar]]</font><sub><font color="aqua" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User talk:Ravichandar84|My coffee shop]]</font></sub> 04:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
282524 +++$+++ Babakexorramdin +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 09:13:00 +++$+++ 1.235841180E09 +++$+++ Calm down. The anonymous user was the one who changed Persia with Iran. I did not have time to revert all his changes. Earlier on I had made some editions to this article. The reason was it was premature to speak of the Kashkuli tribe out of blue, when one is still introducing the whole Qashqai ethnic group in general. I indeed do not agree with the things written in Enc. Iranica. But still I quoted lierary from enc. Iranica. I hope next time you are more respectful and see the edit histoy before blaming others.-- +++$+++ :::: Calm down. The anonymous user was the one who changed Persia with Iran. I did not have time to revert all his changes. Earlier on I had made some editions to this article. The reason was it was premature to speak of the Kashkuli tribe out of blue, when one is still introducing the whole Qashqai ethnic group in general. I indeed do not agree with the things written in Enc. Iranica. But still I quoted lierary from enc. Iranica. I hope next time you are more respectful and see the edit histoy before blaming others.--[[User:Babakexorramdin|Babakexorramdin]] ([[User talk:Babakexorramdin|talk]]) 09:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
282525 +++$+++ Babakexorramdin +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 09:14:00 +++$+++ 1.235841240E09 +++$+++ BTW I DEMAND THAT YOU APPOLOGIZE ON THAT TALKPAGE FOR YOUR ACCUSATION!-- +++$+++ :: BTW I DEMAND THAT YOU APPOLOGIZE ON THAT TALKPAGE FOR YOUR ACCUSATION!--[[User:Babakexorramdin|Babakexorramdin]] ([[User talk:Babakexorramdin|talk]]) 09:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
282526 +++$+++ Babakexorramdin +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282523 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-02-28 11:35:00 +++$+++ 1.235849700E09 +++$+++ I find your discourse very arrogant. For your nfo the quote was not mine. It was there. I only changed the into. and removed the Kashkuli part leaving the rest of the quote intact. In addition I do remember I checked it with Iranica and that was Ok. I might have forgotten to put a link or something I do not remember but what I did is not what you are accusing me of, for example changing Persian Gulf to A... Gulf has had nothing to do with me. Anyone who knows my edits sees that that was unimaginble..-- +++$+++ ::: I find your discourse very arrogant. For your nfo the quote was not mine. It was there. I only changed the into. and removed the Kashkuli part leaving the rest of the quote intact. In addition I do remember I checked it with Iranica and that was Ok. I might have forgotten to put a link or something I do not remember but what I did is not what you are accusing me of, for example changing Persian Gulf to A... Gulf has had nothing to do with me. Anyone who knows my edits sees that that was unimaginble..--[[User:Babakexorramdin|Babakexorramdin]] ([[User talk:Babakexorramdin|talk]]) 11:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

20381 +++$+++ Errabee +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-14 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.155580800E09 +++$+++ Regarding your question about the tag on the talk page of Severus Snape, members of the [[WP:NOVELS|Wikiproject Novels]] will assess the quality and importance (for the novels project, that is) of this article. Every novel and fictional character that has a separate article is in scope of this project. However, as you are not a member of Wikiproject Novels (I think) you don't have to do anything. It will be evaluated by us (eventually).  +++$+++ Regarding your question about the tag on the talk page of Severus Snape, members of the [[WP:NOVELS|Wikiproject Novels]] will assess the quality and importance (for the novels project, that is) of this article. Every novel and fictional character that has a separate article is in scope of this project. However, as you are not a member of Wikiproject Novels (I think) you don't have to do anything. It will be evaluated by us (eventually). [[User:Errabee|Errabee]] 11:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
20382 +++$+++ Errabee +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20381 +++$+++ 20381 +++$+++ 2006-08-14 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.155581640E09 +++$+++ It seems we could really use your help. Why don't you become a member of Wikiproject Novels? You are not obligated to do anything, but that way you can be part of the assessment team. Our assessment procedure can be found here: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels\/Assessment]]. Indeed many people cannot say they have read that many novels, not even I (and I have read a lot of novels). So your help would really be appreciated.  +++$+++ :It seems we could really use your help. Why don't you become a member of Wikiproject Novels? You are not obligated to do anything, but that way you can be part of the assessment team. Our assessment procedure can be found here: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Assessment]]. Indeed many people cannot say they have read that many novels, not even I (and I have read a lot of novels). So your help would really be appreciated. [[User:Errabee|Errabee]] 11:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

282527 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-28 12:38:00 +++$+++ 1.235853480E09 +++$+++ I unreservedly apologise and am very sorry for the misrepresentation and any other hurt I have caused. Sincerely yours,  +++$+++ I unreservedly apologise and am very sorry for the misrepresentation and any other hurt I have caused. Sincerely yours, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 12:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
282528 +++$+++ Babakexorramdin +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282527 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.235901120E09 +++$+++ thank you very much. It shows your class John. I am also sorry that I reacted  bitterly. -- +++$+++ :::thank you very much. It shows your class John. I am also sorry that I reacted  bitterly. --[[User:Babakexorramdin|Babakexorramdin]] ([[User talk:Babakexorramdin|talk]]) 01:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
282529 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282527 +++$+++ 282527 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.235905320E09 +++$+++ And thank you so much for your kind note. I look forward to working with you to help make this article on the [[Qashqai]] and others where we have a common interest more accurate and informative for all. I send you my very warmest wishes,  +++$+++ :And thank you so much for your kind note. I look forward to working with you to help make this article on the [[Qashqai]] and others where we have a common interest more accurate and informative for all. I send you my very warmest wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 03:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
282530 +++$+++ Babakexorramdin +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282527 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 10:33:00 +++$+++ 1.235932380E09 +++$+++ yes as you see the Iranian articles are subject to serious vandalism by anonymous IPs. This is something which is going on now for years. It indeed needs continuous efforts to undo them. I hope you, other editors and I can do a lot in that regard.-- +++$+++ ::: yes as you see the Iranian articles are subject to serious vandalism by anonymous IPs. This is something which is going on now for years. It indeed needs continuous efforts to undo them. I hope you, other editors and I can do a lot in that regard.--[[User:Babakexorramdin|Babakexorramdin]] ([[User talk:Babakexorramdin|talk]]) 10:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

20385 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20385 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-21 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.158850140E09 +++$+++ No one has yet explained the grounds for changing the page from its original title. Can you explain why this was done? It was also done by someone who had never edited the page before and was pretty inexperienced. A justification was given, but not explained. Then (as you noticed) an anon deleted the debate. Also very strange. Why  would anyone do this? Sounded like someone wanted to avoid discussion. While I do not think it likely that people would have opposed the page title change if it is satifactorily explained, this has still not been done. I do not see how any change of title can be discussed or considered to have been voted unless someone explains why it needed to be moved in the first place.  +++$+++ No one has yet explained the grounds for changing the page from its original title. Can you explain why this was done? It was also done by someone who had never edited the page before and was pretty inexperienced. A justification was given, but not explained. Then (as you noticed) an anon deleted the debate. Also very strange. Why  would anyone do this? Sounded like someone wanted to avoid discussion. While I do not think it likely that people would have opposed the page title change if it is satifactorily explained, this has still not been done. I do not see how any change of title can be discussed or considered to have been voted unless someone explains why it needed to be moved in the first place. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 07:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
20386 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20385 +++$+++ 20385 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.158852540E09 +++$+++ By the way, i tried to look up the definition of vandalism. it says: \"Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.\". It then goes on at great length. Perhaps you would like to reconsider the comment you placed on my user page?  +++$+++ :By the way, i tried to look up the definition of vandalism. it says: "Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.". It then goes on at great length. Perhaps you would like to reconsider the comment you placed on my user page? [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 08:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
20387 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20385 +++$+++ 20386 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.158863100E09 +++$+++ Oh good, an easy question.  Page moves can be done by anyone at anytime as long as they're within reason (i.e., don't rename [[Harry Potter 7 (book)]] to [[The new Harry Potter book that is going to be so cool!!!]] or [[Harry Potter 7 (book) on Wheels!!!!]]).  For this, consult [[WP:BOLD]].  If someone wants to move an article to a title ''that is obstructed'', they need to use [[WP:RM]].  For this, consult the first two or three sections of [[WP:RM]].  This is what [[User:Cafzal|{{{2|Cafzal}}}]] ([[User talk:Cafzal|talk]] \u2022 [[Special:Contributions\/Cafzal|contribs]]) did.  Several people logged votes and opinions and the result was an overwhelming (by comparison to other move requests) vote to not bother with the move.  Rather than comment on the open move request, you kept asking why it was moved in the first place.  The problem with getting persistent with that question at that point (as you are continuing to be now) is that you don't own the article.  For this, consult [[WP:OWN]].  No one owes you an explanation as to why it was moved in the first place.  You can politely ask and you can propose some other move but, if no answer is given, you should probably drop it.  Anyway, back to the move request:  Then I became involved.  I'm an administrator.  Administrators go through [[WP:RM]] and close out requests.  This move request came up and I closed it out.  That means ''it's closed''.  As in closed forever.  Read the red text in {{[[Template:polltop|polltop]]}} and {{[[Template:pollbottom|pollbottom]]}}, \"''<font color=\"red\">'''Please do not modify it.'''<\/font>''\"  That means do not modify it.  Ever.  You modified it.  The first time, I re-closed it and tried to be firm in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Harry_Potter_7_%28book%29&diff=76251680&oldid=76246362 my edit summary].  Then you modified it again.  Then you got a nasty message on your talk page.  I was being kind with that simple message - other admins would have put up one of the nasty red stop signs or even just blocked you outright.  Hopefully that clears up your confusion.  You're free to go to [[WP:RM]] and you're free to use [[WP:BOLD]] to move it somewhere else but the community has spoken pretty clearly on that particular move request.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::Oh good, an easy question.  Page moves can be done by anyone at anytime as long as they're within reason (i.e., don't rename [[Harry Potter 7 (book)]] to [[The new Harry Potter book that is going to be so cool!!!]] or [[Harry Potter 7 (book) on Wheels!!!!]]).  For this, consult [[WP:BOLD]].  If someone wants to move an article to a title ''that is obstructed'', they need to use [[WP:RM]].  For this, consult the first two or three sections of [[WP:RM]].  This is what [[User:Cafzal|{{{2|Cafzal}}}]] ([[User talk:Cafzal|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cafzal|contribs]]) did.  Several people logged votes and opinions and the result was an overwhelming (by comparison to other move requests) vote to not bother with the move.  Rather than comment on the open move request, you kept asking why it was moved in the first place.  The problem with getting persistent with that question at that point (as you are continuing to be now) is that you don't own the article.  For this, consult [[WP:OWN]].  No one owes you an explanation as to why it was moved in the first place.  You can politely ask and you can propose some other move but, if no answer is given, you should probably drop it.  Anyway, back to the move request:  Then I became involved.  I'm an administrator.  Administrators go through [[WP:RM]] and close out requests.  This move request came up and I closed it out.  That means ''it's closed''.  As in closed forever.  Read the red text in {{[[Template:polltop|polltop]]}} and {{[[Template:pollbottom|pollbottom]]}}, "''<font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font>''"  That means do not modify it.  Ever.  You modified it.  The first time, I re-closed it and tried to be firm in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harry_Potter_7_%28book%29&diff=76251680&oldid=76246362 my edit summary].  Then you modified it again.  Then you got a nasty message on your talk page.  I was being kind with that simple message - other admins would have put up one of the nasty red stop signs or even just blocked you outright.  Hopefully that clears up your confusion.  You're free to go to [[WP:RM]] and you're free to use [[WP:BOLD]] to move it somewhere else but the community has spoken pretty clearly on that particular move request.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 11:25, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
20388 +++$+++ 0L1 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20385 +++$+++ 20386 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.158885840E09 +++$+++ In reply to the first comment, I was involved with the article before, but I have since created a new account. About the article renaming, if I remember correctly, it went from \"Harry Potter book seven\" to [[Harry Potter 7 (book)]]. I think that the page was moved because somebody said \"7\" is more encyclopedic than \"seven\" and is more consistent with other articles. Myself, I prefer the newer title because I think that \"book\" should not be in the middle of the title, but at the end. However, I don't feel too strongly either way but I don't think that it should be changed back.  +++$+++ ::In reply to the first comment, I was involved with the article before, but I have since created a new account. About the article renaming, if I remember correctly, it went from "Harry Potter book seven" to [[Harry Potter 7 (book)]]. I think that the page was moved because somebody said "7" is more encyclopedic than "seven" and is more consistent with other articles. Myself, I prefer the newer title because I think that "book" should not be in the middle of the title, but at the end. However, I don't feel too strongly either way but I don't think that it should be changed back. [[User:0L1|0L1]] 17:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
20389 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20385 +++$+++ 20388 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.158890700E09 +++$+++ This is all the more disappointing, since I noticed on your RFA page that you stated that you would never find yourself in the situation where you were involved in a disagreement with an editor, where you had not followed all the correct procedures according to guidelines.  As I said before, perhaps you would like to reconsider the comment you placed on my user page?   +++$+++ :::This is all the more disappointing, since I noticed on your RFA page that you stated that you would never find yourself in the situation where you were involved in a disagreement with an editor, where you had not followed all the correct procedures according to guidelines.  As I said before, perhaps you would like to reconsider the comment you placed on my user page?  [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 19:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
20390 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20385 +++$+++ 20389 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.158890700E09 +++$+++ Oh, and I still have no view on the original name change, since I still havn't really found out who did it or why they thought it a good idea. My point was that arbitrarily closing a discussion on this is rather futile, when nothing has really been decided. However, it seems you and I were debating different things.  +++$+++ ::::Oh, and I still have no view on the original name change, since I still havn't really found out who did it or why they thought it a good idea. My point was that arbitrarily closing a discussion on this is rather futile, when nothing has really been decided. However, it seems you and I were debating different things. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 19:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

282531 +++$+++ Chadsnook +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-18 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.237398000E09 +++$+++ Hi John, I was editing on [[Dzungar people]] and I came across with the editing history where I saw you insisted on calling this area ruled by the Dzungars [[East Turkestan]]. I don't think that's the right name to use. I have listed some reasons on [[Talk:Dzungar people]]. Please check it out if you are still interested in the topic. -- +++$+++ Hi John, I was editing on [[Dzungar people]] and I came across with the editing history where I saw you insisted on calling this area ruled by the Dzungars [[East Turkestan]]. I don't think that's the right name to use. I have listed some reasons on [[Talk:Dzungar people]]. Please check it out if you are still interested in the topic. --[[User:Chadsnook|Chadsnook]] ([[User talk:Chadsnook|talk]]) 10:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
282532 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282531 +++$+++ 282531 +++$+++ 2009-03-18 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.237441620E09 +++$+++ I totally agree with the changes. Thanks, [[User:Chadsnook|Chadsnook]] for picking this up, and apologies for my original mistake. I think \"East Turkestan\" was a somewhat fluid name in regards to what territory it covered - but it certainly does not seem to be appropriate here. I can't remember where I took it from - but it looks like I just repeated the statement from something I was reading at the time. Best wishes,  +++$+++ :I totally agree with the changes. Thanks, [[User:Chadsnook|Chadsnook]] for picking this up, and apologies for my original mistake. I think "East Turkestan" was a somewhat fluid name in regards to what territory it covered - but it certainly does not seem to be appropriate here. I can't remember where I took it from - but it looks like I just repeated the statement from something I was reading at the time. Best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
282533 +++$+++ Chadsnook +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282531 +++$+++ 282532 +++$+++ 2009-03-25 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.238049480E09 +++$+++ No problem John. Best wishes to you too. -- +++$+++ ::No problem John. Best wishes to you too. --[[User:Chadsnook|Chadsnook]] ([[User talk:Chadsnook|talk]]) 23:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

20391 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20391 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-21 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.158892620E09 +++$+++ My first reaction here is that you may be taking things a tad too seriously.  It was a small faux pas on your part followed by a warning from me when the faux pas was repeated.  Out of that, you've gone to the lengths of pulling up my [[WP:RFA]] and reading through the whole thing and even extracted information out (BTW I'm honestly not sure which comment you're referring to in there).  All of that over an article which is probably going to be renamed two or three more times before a title is finally announced, after which it will be renamed four or five more times for a variety of peculiar reasons (probably having \"...ON WHEELS!!!!\" at the end for a short time).  Really - it's not worth it.  We should both be adding and fixing content here rather than continuing this.  It sounds like you've been here much longer than me and you've never seen a [[WP:RM]] in action so you may want to research some of the processes here as well.  I wish you luck in improving the article on the Harry Potter 7 book, regardless of the article's title!  :)  \u2014 +++$+++ My first reaction here is that you may be taking things a tad too seriously.  It was a small faux pas on your part followed by a warning from me when the faux pas was repeated.  Out of that, you've gone to the lengths of pulling up my [[WP:RFA]] and reading through the whole thing and even extracted information out (BTW I'm honestly not sure which comment you're referring to in there).  All of that over an article which is probably going to be renamed two or three more times before a title is finally announced, after which it will be renamed four or five more times for a variety of peculiar reasons (probably having "...ON WHEELS!!!!" at the end for a short time).  Really - it's not worth it.  We should both be adding and fixing content here rather than continuing this.  It sounds like you've been here much longer than me and you've never seen a [[WP:RM]] in action so you may want to research some of the processes here as well.  I wish you luck in improving the article on the Harry Potter 7 book, regardless of the article's title!  :)  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 19:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
20392 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20391 +++$+++ 20391 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.158894600E09 +++$+++ Oh, there is a little box to click to show that an edit is a miinor one. One reason i seldom use it, is that experience suggests there is no such thing as a minor edit, including spelling and punctuation.  +++$+++ :Oh, there is a little box to click to show that an edit is a miinor one. One reason i seldom use it, is that experience suggests there is no such thing as a minor edit, including spelling and punctuation. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 20:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

20393 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-30 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.159603140E09 +++$+++ [copied from other page....]Now, to get back to present time.... the section i think I had in mind in your RFA was the following. The questioner was asking about a different situation, but it seemed to me reasonable to assume that your response was transferrable.  +++$+++ [copied from other page....]Now, to get back to present time.... the section i think I had in mind in your RFA was the following. The questioner was asking about a different situation, but it seemed to me reasonable to assume that your response was transferrable. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 00:59, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
20394 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20393 +++$+++ 20393 +++$+++ 2006-07-09 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.152480600E09 +++$+++ I would retag immediately and explain to the user that s\/he would need to go through proper channels to get the tag removed, just as the proper channels were followed to get the tag attached in the first place. \u2014Wknight94 (talk) 14:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :I would retag immediately and explain to the user that s/he would need to go through proper channels to get the tag removed, just as the proper channels were followed to get the tag attached in the first place. —Wknight94 (talk) 14:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
20395 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20393 +++$+++ 20394 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ The problem is people don't understand the guidelines in regards to whether a user's homepage should be tagged. I trust however that you'll be patient with users and use proper judgement. Axiomm 15:32, 9 July 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ ::The problem is people don't understand the guidelines in regards to whether a user's homepage should be tagged. I trust however that you'll be patient with users and use proper judgement. Axiomm 15:32, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

282538 +++$+++ Ravichandar84 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-27 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.240836900E09 +++$+++ Hi! How are you doing? :-) -<font style=\"color:white;background:black;\" size=\"font-weight:normal\" face=\"Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ Hi! How are you doing? :-) -<font style="color:white;background:black;" size="font-weight:normal" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Ravichandar84|The Enforcer]]</font><sub><font color="red" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User talk:Ravichandar84|Office of the secret service]]</font></sub> 05:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
282539 +++$+++ Ravichandar84 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282538 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-01 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.241211120E09 +++$+++ Oh! I am sorry to hear that! I know little about medicine and the human body. I chanced upon your work on Khotanese History in the Indo-Iranian journal. You've done a great work with it! I am a history enthusiast and am interested in South Asian and Iranian history in particular. I'm compiling a small paper on the impact of non-Aryan influences on the history of Old Persia.  I would like to publish my own book sometime in my life. But unfortunately, I'm busy with my job now and it is due to the fact that life gets busy that I am compelled to leave Wikipedia. I cannot speak much now. I'm leaving for [[Bengaluru]] this night. Take care of your health. Sorry, I cannot speak for long.-<font style=\"color:white;background:black;\" size=\"font-weight:normal\" face=\"Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ :: Oh! I am sorry to hear that! I know little about medicine and the human body. I chanced upon your work on Khotanese History in the Indo-Iranian journal. You've done a great work with it! I am a history enthusiast and am interested in South Asian and Iranian history in particular. I'm compiling a small paper on the impact of non-Aryan influences on the history of Old Persia.  I would like to publish my own book sometime in my life. But unfortunately, I'm busy with my job now and it is due to the fact that life gets busy that I am compelled to leave Wikipedia. I cannot speak much now. I'm leaving for [[Bengaluru]] this night. Take care of your health. Sorry, I cannot speak for long.-<font style="color:white;background:black;" size="font-weight:normal" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Ravichandar84|The Enforcer]]</font><sub><font color="red" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User talk:Ravichandar84|Office of the secret service]]</font></sub> 13:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
282540 +++$+++ Ravichandar84 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282538 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-01 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.241211180E09 +++$+++ Good luck for your work with the book. :-)-<font style=\"color:white;background:black;\" size=\"font-weight:normal\" face=\"Monotype Corsiva\"> +++$+++ :: Good luck for your work with the book. :-)-<font style="color:white;background:black;" size="font-weight:normal" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Ravichandar84|The Enforcer]]</font><sub><font color="red" face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User talk:Ravichandar84|Office of the secret service]]</font></sub> 13:53, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
282541 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282538 +++$+++ 282538 +++$+++ 2009-05-01 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.241212200E09 +++$+++ Hi again Ravi - and thanks so much for your kind thoughts. Please don't apologise for the lack of time - I know how life and work can take up one's life - why else would I have spent 30 years writing one book? I just wish you all the very best in your endeavors - and hope life brings happiness and fulfillment to you - whatever you do - and that you don't lose your interest in history because of the demands of the rat race of life. I send you my very best wishes and thanks again for your encouragement (and, by the way, it was wonderful to hear that you happened upon me through my 1988 article on the history of Khotan in the ''Indo-Iranian Journal'' - I've often wondered whether anyone had ever taken any notice of it - it is most gratifying to hear you found it). Cheers,  +++$+++ : Hi again Ravi - and thanks so much for your kind thoughts. Please don't apologise for the lack of time - I know how life and work can take up one's life - why else would I have spent 30 years writing one book? I just wish you all the very best in your endeavors - and hope life brings happiness and fulfillment to you - whatever you do - and that you don't lose your interest in history because of the demands of the rat race of life. I send you my very best wishes and thanks again for your encouragement (and, by the way, it was wonderful to hear that you happened upon me through my 1988 article on the history of Khotan in the ''Indo-Iranian Journal'' - I've often wondered whether anyone had ever taken any notice of it - it is most gratifying to hear you found it). Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 14:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

544685 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544685 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-21 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.195705500E09 +++$+++ For the reverts. :)  +++$+++ For the reverts. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 20:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
544686 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544685 +++$+++ 544685 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.195708560E09 +++$+++ I have no objection to your semi-protection of my user page. Thanks for it. :)  +++$+++ :I have no objection to your semi-protection of my user page. Thanks for it. :) [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 21:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

20399 +++$+++ John Reaves +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20399 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-27 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.164685560E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] 19:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
20400 +++$+++ John Reaves +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20399 +++$+++ 20399 +++$+++ 2006-11-27 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.164686280E09 +++$+++ Okay, sounds good.  On a side note, good job on the copyediting, it really helps the article's quality. <Br>  +++$+++ :Okay, sounds good.  On a side note, good job on the copyediting, it really helps the article's quality. <Br> [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] 19:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

544690 +++$+++ Masterpiece2000 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-23 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.195822800E09 +++$+++ Hello Tim. I created the article [[Aeropyrum pernix]]. I am not a biologist. Can you please help me to expand the article? Regards,  +++$+++ Hello Tim. I created the article [[Aeropyrum pernix]]. I am not a biologist. Can you please help me to expand the article? Regards, [[User:Masterpiece2000|Masterpiece2000]] ([[User talk:Masterpiece2000|talk]]) 05:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
544691 +++$+++ Masterpiece2000 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544690 +++$+++ 544690 +++$+++ 2007-11-24 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.195921260E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your contributions. You really did a great job. Regards,  +++$+++ :Thank you for your contributions. You really did a great job. Regards, [[User:Masterpiece2000|Masterpiece2000]] ([[User talk:Masterpiece2000|talk]]) 08:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

483998 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-31 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.199173380E09 +++$+++ Thank you for fixing that weirdness. Maybe I could report that \"FU\" note to the admin that keeps arguing with me about the term \"compete\". :)  +++$+++ Thank you for fixing that weirdness. Maybe I could report that "FU" note to the admin that keeps arguing with me about the term "compete". :) [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 23:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
483999 +++$+++ Eldorado91 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.199174760E09 +++$+++ Okay dude, your not going to \"report\" that dude. That was my idoit boy friend who was drinking and pretending he was [[Jim Morrison]] singing  \"The End\". +++$+++ : Okay dude, your not going to "report" that dude. That was my idoit boy friend who was drinking and pretending he was [[Jim Morrison]] singing  "The End".[[User:Eldorado91|Eldorado91]] ([[User talk:Eldorado91|talk]]) 00:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484000 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 483999 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.199175540E09 +++$+++ Don't jump to the conclusion that I'm not going to report it. I have the right (and perhaps the responsibility) to do so.  +++$+++ ::Don't jump to the conclusion that I'm not going to report it. I have the right (and perhaps the responsibility) to do so. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 00:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484001 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 484000 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.199175720E09 +++$+++ And, by the way, I have heard the \"someone used my ID\" claim before, from others.  +++$+++ :::And, by the way, I have heard the "someone used my ID" claim before, from others. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 00:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484002 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.199186460E09 +++$+++ What admin is arguing about \"compete\"?  I don't see any admins on your talk page.  \u2014 +++$+++ :What admin is arguing about "compete"?  I don't see any admins on your talk page.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484003 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 484002 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.199187720E09 +++$+++ It's just this stupid semantic argument I've gotten myself into [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_College_football#Wording_question] and one of the arguers against me is an admin, but it's the fanboy types that are threatening to have me banned for not letting the argument go as the mis-use of this word offends my sense of order. However, that has nothing to do with this \"I'm going to kill u\" stuff, near as I can tell. Anyway, the admin ignored it so far. But if that guy's serious, he's going to have to clear it with my supervisor first, as our development team is too small already.  +++$+++ ::It's just this stupid semantic argument I've gotten myself into [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_College_football#Wording_question] and one of the arguers against me is an admin, but it's the fanboy types that are threatening to have me banned for not letting the argument go as the mis-use of this word offends my sense of order. However, that has nothing to do with this "I'm going to kill u" stuff, near as I can tell. Anyway, the admin ignored it so far. But if that guy's serious, he's going to have to clear it with my supervisor first, as our development team is too small already. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 03:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484004 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 484003 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.199189880E09 +++$+++ Wow, that argument might make for a nice entry at [[WP:LAME]].  I don't want to get within 100 feet of that argument but one thing hit me - to say that a team \"competes\" in a division sounds a bit like they compete ''only'' in that division.  That's not the case in MLB and, to my knowledge, that's not the case in NCAAF either.  Otherwise, I couldn't care less which term is used.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::Wow, that argument might make for a nice entry at [[WP:LAME]].  I don't want to get within 100 feet of that argument but one thing hit me - to say that a team "competes" in a division sounds a bit like they compete ''only'' in that division.  That's not the case in MLB and, to my knowledge, that's not the case in NCAAF either.  Otherwise, I couldn't care less which term is used.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 04:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484005 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 484004 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.199190480E09 +++$+++ It started with eye-witnessing a Gophers game this year, and then wondering (after they finished 1-11, even worse than was predicted) how anyone could justify saying they \"compete\" in anything, let alone the Big 10. It's pretty clear that they are going to get their way on this wording issue, so I'm done with it.  +++$+++ ::::It started with eye-witnessing a Gophers game this year, and then wondering (after they finished 1-11, even worse than was predicted) how anyone could justify saying they "compete" in anything, let alone the Big 10. It's pretty clear that they are going to get their way on this wording issue, so I'm done with it. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 04:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484006 +++$+++ Eldorado91 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 484002 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.199228460E09 +++$+++ Baseballl Bugs, I didnt threaten you okay. It was my ex-friend now. He is not my friend anymore. Okay, I'm sorry for his stupid behavior okay. Can I deserve a second chance. We all make mistakes okay. I'm sorry for his behavior , and what he cause to this site. Can I have a second chance, and in return I will promise this \"bs\" will never happend again. I swear to GOD this will not happend again. +++$+++ ::Baseballl Bugs, I didnt threaten you okay. It was my ex-friend now. He is not my friend anymore. Okay, I'm sorry for his stupid behavior okay. Can I deserve a second chance. We all make mistakes okay. I'm sorry for his behavior , and what he cause to this site. Can I have a second chance, and in return I will promise this "bs" will never happend again. I swear to GOD this will not happend again.[[User:Eldorado91|Eldorado91]] ([[User talk:Eldorado91|talk]]) 15:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484007 +++$+++ Eldorado91 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 484002 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.199228520E09 +++$+++ Bugs, my friend didnt have an edit war with you. I dont know what your talking about. He was just an idoitic moron. Okay. +++$+++ ::Bugs, my friend didnt have an edit war with you. I dont know what your talking about. He was just an idoitic moron. Okay.[[User:Eldorado91|Eldorado91]] ([[User talk:Eldorado91|talk]]) 15:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484008 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 484007 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.199231100E09 +++$+++ The above user also posted a note on [[User talk:Luna Santin]], labeling the possibility of turning him in as a \"threat\".  +++$+++ :::The above user also posted a note on [[User talk:Luna Santin]], labeling the possibility of turning him in as a "threat". [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 15:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484009 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 484008 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.199231400E09 +++$+++ That's enough.  Eldorado91 has been blocked indefinitely.  In addition to probably being a sock of an IP that made a death threat, he also has a talk page full of vandalism warnings and warnings about frivolous AFDs, etc.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::::That's enough.  Eldorado91 has been blocked indefinitely.  In addition to probably being a sock of an IP that made a death threat, he also has a talk page full of vandalism warnings and warnings about frivolous AFDs, etc.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 15:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484010 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 484009 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.199232240E09 +++$+++ Looks like he's back right away, in a different IP address: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Baseball_Bugs&diff=181396243&oldid=181303045]  +++$+++ :::::Looks like he's back right away, in a different IP address: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Baseball_Bugs&diff=181396243&oldid=181303045] [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 16:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484011 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 483998 +++$+++ 484010 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.199234460E09 +++$+++ And now this: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Baseball_Bugs&diff=181397090&oldid=181397067]  +++$+++ ::::::And now this: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Baseball_Bugs&diff=181397090&oldid=181397067] [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 16:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

544696 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544696 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-27 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.196232360E09 +++$+++ I was going to say that I was named after ''the greatest, most awesomely useful transgenic mouse '''ever'''''... but then I might be a little biased :-) -- +++$+++ I was going to say that I was named after ''the greatest, most awesomely useful transgenic mouse '''ever'''''... but then I might be a little biased :-) --[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] ([[User talk:DO11.10|talk]]) 22:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
544697 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544696 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.196241960E09 +++$+++ Those were great!! Ah, scientists after my own heart... I really felt his pain when the smallpox guy had to give up his collection to the CDC. -- +++$+++ :: Those were great!! Ah, scientists after my own heart... I really felt his pain when the smallpox guy had to give up his collection to the CDC. --[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] ([[User talk:DO11.10|talk]]) 01:26, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
544698 +++$+++ DO11.10 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544696 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.196316840E09 +++$+++ Special thanks to you for nominating me! I will try to make you proud (or at least not regret it <grin>).-- +++$+++ :::Special thanks to you for nominating me! I will try to make you proud (or at least not regret it <grin>).--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] ([[User talk:DO11.10|talk]]) 22:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
544699 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544696 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.196315940E09 +++$+++ Out of curiosity, which of the three references supporting this sentence did you read?  +++$+++ ::Out of curiosity, which of the three references supporting this sentence did you read? [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 21:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
544700 +++$+++ Friarslantern +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544696 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.196317500E09 +++$+++ I will read up on these.  To answer your question, I read both articles cited in the section you reverted.  There are two references there, I'm not sure which would be the third (?)  +++$+++ :::I will read up on these.  To answer your question, I read both articles cited in the section you reverted.  There are two references there, I'm not sure which would be the third (?) [[User:Friarslantern|Friarslantern]] ([[User talk:Friarslantern|talk]]) 22:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

20409 +++$+++ Michaelsanders +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20409 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-19 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.171956660E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Michaelsanders|Michaelsanders]] 23:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
20410 +++$+++ Michaelsanders +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20409 +++$+++ 20409 +++$+++ 2007-03-02 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.172864520E09 +++$+++ ''\"They couldn't keep me company as humans, so they kept me company as animals,\" said Lupin. \"A werewolf is only a danger to people.\"''  +++$+++ :''"They couldn't keep me company as humans, so they kept me company as animals," said Lupin. "A werewolf is only a danger to people."'' [[User:Michaelsanders|Michaelsanders]] 11:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
20411 +++$+++ Michaelsanders +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20409 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.173047520E09 +++$+++ A werewolf is only a 'danger' to people, not to animagi. Lupin harmed Sirius, as your quote shows - but Sirius did not become a werewolf. So Sirius was never in danger from the werewolf.  +++$+++ :::A werewolf is only a 'danger' to people, not to animagi. Lupin harmed Sirius, as your quote shows - but Sirius did not become a werewolf. So Sirius was never in danger from the werewolf. [[User:Michaelsanders|Michael]]  [[User talk:Michaelsanders|Sanders]] 14:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
20412 +++$+++ Michaelsanders +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20409 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.173063660E09 +++$+++ As for the werewolf thing - Lupin said, \"A werewolf is only a danger to people\". Since people and animals are equally at risk of being shredded, he can only have been talking about the werewolf curse - which, as we saw when he attacked Sirius in PoA, didn't infect Sirius when in his animagical form.  +++$+++ ::::As for the werewolf thing - Lupin said, "A werewolf is only a danger to people". Since people and animals are equally at risk of being shredded, he can only have been talking about the werewolf curse - which, as we saw when he attacked Sirius in PoA, didn't infect Sirius when in his animagical form. [[User:Michaelsanders|Michael]]  [[User talk:Michaelsanders|Sanders]] 19:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

282555 +++$+++ Hindutashravi +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282555 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-06 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.244289480E09 +++$+++ In the Article [[Sanju Pass]] which you created, you had not either implicitly or explicitly stated that the Sanju La was situate in a particular country. I appreciated your stance since the entire northern border of Kashmir is disputed by the Chinese holding  [[East Turkistan]] and the stance of even the Chinese is that the northern border of Kashmir has neither been delineated or demarcated. Western cartographers running berserk both prior to 1947 and post 1947 have been depicting the northern border of Kashmir arbitrarily and in accordance with their whims and fancies[http:\/\/dsal.uchicago.edu\/reference\/schwartzberg\/fullscreen.html?object=125] and even never consistently.  In accordance with the spirit of the Article, I did not either implicitly or explicitly state in my  edit, though the Sanju pass is on the northern border of Kashmir, that the Sanju  is a part of Kashmir. Like your source , viz. \"Report of a Mission to Yarkund in 1873 : vol.1, p. 245. (1875). T. D. Forsyth. Calcutta\", I had also provided further sources.My edit is there for all to see. [[Res ipsa loquitur]].   This [[user:Fowler&fowler]],  indulging in foul play had no use of the article till I myself edited the article . The moment I edited the article,  she reverts it and defying the spirit of the article, unilaterally and arbitrarily states that the Sanju Pass  is allegedly  in the so-called \u201c[[Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region]]\u201d, and then in the Discussion page of the article goes to blatantly make misrepresentations that I \u201cseek to claim the region of this pass for the Republic of India\u201d , when as a matter of fact, I had deliberately abstained from stating that the Sanju pass is in Kashmir. As a matter of fact, I had suggested to [[user:Fowler&fowler]] that in the article,  [[Hindutash]], a consensus can be arrived at on the model of the [[Sanju Pass]] article, i.e. abstaining from stating that the pass is situate in a particular country. He\/she never gave a proper reply. Infact, she\/he has never given a proper reply in my entire  correspondence with her\/him in the entire Discussion Page for Hindutash. You or anyone else can see for yourself! What angers me is that she \/he, unable to refute or disprove my assertions, references and corroboration provided, seeks the help of her\/his friends and [[coterie]] to protect her\/his  POV version, and she\/he makes false allegations against me like the one in the Talk page of [[Sanju Pass]]. I would like to know how you feel about her\/ his nefarious actions, and how to deal with her\/him vis-\xe3 \u2013vis inter alia the articles on [[Hindutash]] and [[Sanju Pass]]. Regards. +++$+++ In the Article [[Sanju Pass]] which you created, you had not either implicitly or explicitly stated that the Sanju La was situate in a particular country. I appreciated your stance since the entire northern border of Kashmir is disputed by the Chinese holding  [[East Turkistan]] and the stance of even the Chinese is that the northern border of Kashmir has neither been delineated or demarcated. Western cartographers running berserk both prior to 1947 and post 1947 have been depicting the northern border of Kashmir arbitrarily and in accordance with their whims and fancies[http://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/schwartzberg/fullscreen.html?object=125] and even never consistently.  In accordance with the spirit of the Article, I did not either implicitly or explicitly state in my  edit, though the Sanju pass is on the northern border of Kashmir, that the Sanju  is a part of Kashmir. Like your source , viz. "Report of a Mission to Yarkund in 1873 : vol.1, p. 245. (1875). T. D. Forsyth. Calcutta", I had also provided further sources.My edit is there for all to see. [[Res ipsa loquitur]].   This [[user:Fowler&fowler]],  indulging in foul play had no use of the article till I myself edited the article . The moment I edited the article,  she reverts it and defying the spirit of the article, unilaterally and arbitrarily states that the Sanju Pass  is allegedly  in the so-called “[[Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region]]”, and then in the Discussion page of the article goes to blatantly make misrepresentations that I “seek to claim the region of this pass for the Republic of India” , when as a matter of fact, I had deliberately abstained from stating that the Sanju pass is in Kashmir. As a matter of fact, I had suggested to [[user:Fowler&fowler]] that in the article,  [[Hindutash]], a consensus can be arrived at on the model of the [[Sanju Pass]] article, i.e. abstaining from stating that the pass is situate in a particular country. He/she never gave a proper reply. Infact, she/he has never given a proper reply in my entire  correspondence with her/him in the entire Discussion Page for Hindutash. You or anyone else can see for yourself! What angers me is that she /he, unable to refute or disprove my assertions, references and corroboration provided, seeks the help of her/his friends and [[coterie]] to protect her/his  POV version, and she/he makes false allegations against me like the one in the Talk page of [[Sanju Pass]]. I would like to know how you feel about her/ his nefarious actions, and how to deal with her/him vis-ã –vis inter alia the articles on [[Hindutash]] and [[Sanju Pass]]. Regards.[[User:Hindutashravi|Hindutashravi]] ([[User talk:Hindutashravi|talk]]) 04:58, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
282556 +++$+++ Fowler&amp;fowler +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282555 +++$+++ 282555 +++$+++ 2009-06-08 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.244502300E09 +++$+++ Sorry, John Hill, to \"drive by\" on your talk page, but Hindutashravi is a known irredentist vandal who has been waging a lonely battle on Wikipedia on behalf of two historical passes that today lie in [[Xinjiang]], [[People's Republic of China]].  The latter nation's sovereignty over that region is disputed by no country (including all the countries of the region).  The passes, moreover, are closed; they are no longer referred to by those names.  I talked to someone who rode his motorcycle along the Karakash river highway and he said that he saw no signs for any passes, indeed, he saw no settlements, except for a truck stop of two.  The Sanju Pass, in any case, lies some 70 miles north of [[Xaidulla]] (formerly Shahidulla), (lat:36.3 N; long: 78.02 E).  See for examples the map: [http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/d\/d5\/Johnson-journey-ilchi1865-mapa.jpg Map of W. H. Johnson] that I uploaded on Wikipedia.  Sanju is clearly outside by boundaries of Kashmir.  Similarly none of the maps from [http:\/\/dsal.uchicago.edu\/reference\/schwartzberg\/fullscreen.html?object=125 Joe Schwartzberg's Historical Atlas of South Asia at DSAL in Chicago], show the Sanju Pass in any of the various boundaries of the [[British Indian Empire]].   As you can see in section C, [[Xaidulla]] (lat:36.3 N; long: 78.02 E), which lies on the second sharp bend of the [[Karakash River]] is at best on the boundary of the most expansive of these historical maps.  How can a pass, some 70 miles north of Xiadulla (Shahidula) lie anywhere but in [[Chinese Turkestan]]?  The maps in section D are even more conservative, the entire stretch of the Karakash river between Sumpal and Xaidulla lies ''outside'' the boundaries of these maps.  Only ''one'' of the dozen maps in C and D, the Times Atlas (1900), shows the [[Hindutash]] pass in Kashmir; the later Times Atlas Map doesn't.   It is time for sane editors on Wikipedia to put an end to Hindutashravi's obsessive edits.    +++$+++ :Sorry, John Hill, to "drive by" on your talk page, but Hindutashravi is a known irredentist vandal who has been waging a lonely battle on Wikipedia on behalf of two historical passes that today lie in [[Xinjiang]], [[People's Republic of China]].  The latter nation's sovereignty over that region is disputed by no country (including all the countries of the region).  The passes, moreover, are closed; they are no longer referred to by those names.  I talked to someone who rode his motorcycle along the Karakash river highway and he said that he saw no signs for any passes, indeed, he saw no settlements, except for a truck stop of two.  The Sanju Pass, in any case, lies some 70 miles north of [[Xaidulla]] (formerly Shahidulla), (lat:36.3 N; long: 78.02 E).  See for examples the map: [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d5/Johnson-journey-ilchi1865-mapa.jpg Map of W. H. Johnson] that I uploaded on Wikipedia.  Sanju is clearly outside by boundaries of Kashmir.  Similarly none of the maps from [http://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/schwartzberg/fullscreen.html?object=125 Joe Schwartzberg's Historical Atlas of South Asia at DSAL in Chicago], show the Sanju Pass in any of the various boundaries of the [[British Indian Empire]].   As you can see in section C, [[Xaidulla]] (lat:36.3 N; long: 78.02 E), which lies on the second sharp bend of the [[Karakash River]] is at best on the boundary of the most expansive of these historical maps.  How can a pass, some 70 miles north of Xiadulla (Shahidula) lie anywhere but in [[Chinese Turkestan]]?  The maps in section D are even more conservative, the entire stretch of the Karakash river between Sumpal and Xaidulla lies ''outside'' the boundaries of these maps.  Only ''one'' of the dozen maps in C and D, the Times Atlas (1900), shows the [[Hindutash]] pass in Kashmir; the later Times Atlas Map doesn't.   It is time for sane editors on Wikipedia to put an end to Hindutashravi's obsessive edits.   [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</font>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<font color="#708090">«Talk»</font>]] 16:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

20413 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ As for the werewolf thing - Lupin said, \"A werewolf is only a danger to people\". Since people and animals are equally at risk of being shredded, he can only have been talking about the werewolf curse - which, as we saw when he attacked Sirius in PoA, didn't infect Sirius when in his animagical form. Michael Sanders 19:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ As for the werewolf thing - Lupin said, "A werewolf is only a danger to people". Since people and animals are equally at risk of being shredded, he can only have been talking about the werewolf curse - which, as we saw when he attacked Sirius in PoA, didn't infect Sirius when in his animagical form. Michael Sanders 19:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
20414 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20413 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-04 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.173065280E09 +++$+++ er, yes, exactly, so you cannot say that ''(animagi are invulnerable to werewolf bites when transformed)'', because they simply aren't. They may be protected from the magical aspect, presumably because they are not human, but they are not proteced from the physical aspect of the attack.  +++$+++ ::er, yes, exactly, so you cannot say that ''(animagi are invulnerable to werewolf bites when transformed)'', because they simply aren't. They may be protected from the magical aspect, presumably because they are not human, but they are not proteced from the physical aspect of the attack. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 19:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

20415 +++$+++ Cremepuff222 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20415 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-04 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.173080220E09 +++$+++ Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}! I think that you're a really great editor, so, do you think that you could sign my autograph book, maybe? It would be an honor if you did! See ya later, {{BASEPAGENAME}}! <!--[[User:Where\/sigContract]];Cremepuff222--><span style=\"font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 12pt\">[[User:Cremepuff222|<font color=\"008000\">Cremepuff222<\/font>]] ([[User talk:Cremepuff222|<font color=\"2F4F4F\">talk<\/font>]],  +++$+++ Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}! I think that you're a really great editor, so, do you think that you could sign my autograph book, maybe? It would be an honor if you did! See ya later, {{BASEPAGENAME}}! <!--[[User:Where/sigContract]];Cremepuff222--><span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 12pt">[[User:Cremepuff222|<font color="008000">Cremepuff222</font>]] ([[User talk:Cremepuff222|<font color="2F4F4F">talk</font>]], [[User:Cremepuff222/Autograph Book|<font color="2F4F4F">sign book</font>]]) </span><!--ESC:Cremepuff222--> 23:37, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
20416 +++$+++ Cremepuff222 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20415 +++$+++ 20415 +++$+++ 2007-03-05 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.173163140E09 +++$+++ Yeah, about that... Can it be deleted? <!--[[User:Where\/sigContract]];Cremepuff222--><span style=\"font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 12pt\">[[User:Cremepuff222|<font color=\"008000\">Cremepuff222<\/font>]] ([[User talk:Cremepuff222|<font color=\"2F4F4F\">talk<\/font>]],  +++$+++ :Yeah, about that... Can it be deleted? <!--[[User:Where/sigContract]];Cremepuff222--><span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 12pt">[[User:Cremepuff222|<font color="008000">Cremepuff222</font>]] ([[User talk:Cremepuff222|<font color="2F4F4F">talk</font>]], [[User:Cremepuff222/Autograph Book|<font color="2F4F4F">sign book</font>]]) </span><!--ESC:Cremepuff222--> 22:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

282560 +++$+++ AnonMoos +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-10 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.244664300E09 +++$+++ Why are they considered to be \"on the silk road\"?  This area was the terminus for the sea route from Mesopotamia through the Persian Gulf to the western coast of India, but its rather doubtful that it was a significant hub for land-based trade from China or Central Asia to the Levant...  +++$+++ Why are they considered to be "on the silk road"?  This area was the terminus for the sea route from Mesopotamia through the Persian Gulf to the western coast of India, but its rather doubtful that it was a significant hub for land-based trade from China or Central Asia to the Levant... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 13:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
282561 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282560 +++$+++ 282560 +++$+++ 2009-06-11 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.244705040E09 +++$+++ I hope this answers your questions, but if you have any further queries, please don't hesitate to contact me again. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I hope this answers your questions, but if you have any further queries, please don't hesitate to contact me again. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 00:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

20418 +++$+++ John Reaves +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20418 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-07 04:58:00 +++$+++ 1.173272280E09 +++$+++ Hi, I meant to do this a long time ago, but I guess I forgot.  You are the \"Sandpiper\" on the HP wiki right?  +++$+++ Hi, I meant to do this a long time ago, but I guess I forgot.  You are the "Sandpiper" on the HP wiki right? [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 04:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
20419 +++$+++ John Reaves +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20418 +++$+++ 20418 +++$+++ 2007-03-07 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.173283620E09 +++$+++ Okay, thanks for the confirmation.  +++$+++ :Okay, thanks for the confirmation. [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 08:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

544707 +++$+++ Alice.S +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-01 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.196535600E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Alice.S/About_Me|<font color="#CC2200">Alice.S</font>]] 11:00, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
544708 +++$+++ Durova +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544707 +++$+++ 544707 +++$+++ 2007-12-01 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.196565420E09 +++$+++ Your Majesty, I was especially impressed to see where you concentrated your energies.  Special thanks for directing your focus toward imporant high level articles. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Your Majesty, I was especially impressed to see where you concentrated your energies.  Special thanks for directing your focus toward imporant high level articles. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 19:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

20422 +++$+++ Michaelsanders +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-04 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.175737080E09 +++$+++ I know - I was intending to do it at 18:15, like I promised; however, internet packed up, and I hadn't checked the horcrux article today anyway; bit of a surprise, I must say, to discover. Anyway, hopefully, the miscreant will be willing to discuss the issue again, instead of taking it upon himself to view his sole voice as a majority view.  +++$+++ I know - I was intending to do it at 18:15, like I promised; however, internet packed up, and I hadn't checked the horcrux article today anyway; bit of a surprise, I must say, to discover. Anyway, hopefully, the miscreant will be willing to discuss the issue again, instead of taking it upon himself to view his sole voice as a majority view. [[User:Michaelsanders|Michael]]  [[User talk:Michaelsanders|Sanders]] 18:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
20423 +++$+++ Michaelsanders +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20422 +++$+++ 20422 +++$+++ 2007-04-04 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.175737440E09 +++$+++ If we're lucky, he'll perhaps learn from this that he is ''not'' above the rules.  +++$+++ :If we're lucky, he'll perhaps learn from this that he is ''not'' above the rules. [[User:Michaelsanders|Michael]]  [[User talk:Michaelsanders|Sanders]] 18:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
20424 +++$+++ Michaelsanders +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20422 +++$+++ 20423 +++$+++ 2007-04-05 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.175766720E09 +++$+++ [[The Vision of Escaflowne#Main characters|Delusions of grandeur]]; although one might hope our's will share the orignal's fate.  +++$+++ ::[[The Vision of Escaflowne#Main characters|Delusions of grandeur]]; although one might hope our's will share the orignal's fate. [[User:Michaelsanders|Michael]]  [[User talk:Michaelsanders|Sanders]] 02:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

544712 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544712 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-02 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.196658120E09 +++$+++ Is there (or will there be) a ''separate'' article on NADP?  Your comments re: the GA nom imply that there will be, but I don't see any indication in the article itself that such a page exists.  If NAD & NADP will be treated on separate article pages, that fact should be made prominently and repeatedly clear.  If there will be a single article, then it should treat all aspects of both compounds. -- +++$+++ Is there (or will there be) a ''separate'' article on NADP?  Your comments re: the GA nom imply that there will be, but I don't see any indication in the article itself that such a page exists.  If NAD & NADP will be treated on separate article pages, that fact should be made prominently and repeatedly clear.  If there will be a single article, then it should treat all aspects of both compounds. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] 21:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
544713 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544712 +++$+++ 544712 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.196736600E09 +++$+++ FWIW, I think the new version of the article should pass GA and is very close to qualifying for FA status.  However, I will not (in fairness) be reviewing the article this time around, since I have now contributed significantly to the article. -- +++$+++ :FWIW, I think the new version of the article should pass GA and is very close to qualifying for FA status.  However, I will not (in fairness) be reviewing the article this time around, since I have now contributed significantly to the article. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] 18:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

282570 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282570 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-27 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.246130880E09 +++$+++ I hope you will accept this invitation and join our small but growing community. You can contact me at either IAmEricConnor@yahoo.com or guitargod7_5@hotmail.com and I will provide you with the necessary links. Regards.--<strong> +++$+++ I hope you will accept this invitation and join our small but growing community. You can contact me at either IAmEricConnor@yahoo.com or guitargod7_5@hotmail.com and I will provide you with the necessary links. Regards.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 12:28, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
282571 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282570 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-28 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.246233060E09 +++$+++ I have sent you a reply email with links to the forum. Cheers!--<strong> +++$+++ ::I have sent you a reply email with links to the forum. Cheers!--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 16:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
282572 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282570 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.246498320E09 +++$+++ Hi John. Everything ok? I noticed that you joined the forum already and I have already shot you a private message. See you in the discussions! Cheers.--<strong> +++$+++ :::Hi John. Everything ok? I noticed that you joined the forum already and I have already shot you a private message. See you in the discussions! Cheers.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 18:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
282573 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282570 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-03 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.246609380E09 +++$+++ Hello? Did you happen to get my private message yet at the forum? I'd like to invite you to join a reading group at the forum which will discuss a book on Silk Road history recently published by Beckwith. Regards.--<strong> +++$+++ ::::Hello? Did you happen to get my private message yet at the forum? I'd like to invite you to join a reading group at the forum which will discuss a book on Silk Road history recently published by Beckwith. Regards.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 01:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

20427 +++$+++ Michaelsanders +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.175926800E09 +++$+++ Just thought you'd like to know: [[Blood purity]] is up for deletion.  +++$+++ Just thought you'd like to know: [[Blood purity]] is up for deletion. [[User:Michaelsanders|Michael]]  [[User talk:Michaelsanders|Sanders]] 23:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
20428 +++$+++ Michaelsanders +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20427 +++$+++ 20427 +++$+++ 2007-04-06 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.175926920E09 +++$+++ I've also reported Folken for breaking 3RR on [[Horcrux]].  +++$+++ :I've also reported Folken for breaking 3RR on [[Horcrux]]. [[User:Michaelsanders|Michael]]  [[User talk:Michaelsanders|Sanders]] 23:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

544717 +++$+++ Shekharsuman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544717 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-04 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.196820000E09 +++$+++ dear tim, if you think the links are inappropriate feel free to delete, i am not interested in spamming, or any kind of promotion, i just want the wikipedians a good user experience. any ways i apologise that you found the links inappropriate. sorry. by the way i am a Biotechnologist from india.and u?  +++$+++ dear tim, if you think the links are inappropriate feel free to delete, i am not interested in spamming, or any kind of promotion, i just want the wikipedians a good user experience. any ways i apologise that you found the links inappropriate. sorry. by the way i am a Biotechnologist from india.and u? [[User:Shekharsuman|Shekharsuman]] 18:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
544718 +++$+++ Shekharsuman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544717 +++$+++ 544717 +++$+++ 2007-12-04 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.196820600E09 +++$+++ ok thats cool,Nice to meet you Dr vickers, hope to meet u some time in my next trip to US, :-)  +++$+++ :ok thats cool,Nice to meet you Dr vickers, hope to meet u some time in my next trip to US, :-) [[User:Shekharsuman|Shekharsuman]] 18:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

20431 +++$+++ Cyrus Andiron +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-12 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.176365340E09 +++$+++ I was wondering why you were including my sig in the edit summaries [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Dates_in_Harry_Potter_%28second_nomination%29&diff=122101395&oldid=122101300| of the AFD]. Cheers!-- +++$+++ I was wondering why you were including my sig in the edit summaries [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dates_in_Harry_Potter_%28second_nomination%29&diff=122101395&oldid=122101300| of the AFD]. Cheers!--[[User:Cyrus Andiron|<font face="Elephant"><font color="8B 00 00">Cy</font><font color="B2 22 22">ru</font><font color="DC 14 3C">s</font></font>]]  [[User talk:Cyrus Andiron|<font face="Elephant"><font color="DC 14 3C">An</font><font color="B2 22 22">dir</font><font color="8B 00 00">on</font></font>]] 01:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
20432 +++$+++ Cyrus Andiron +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20431 +++$+++ 20431 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.176366540E09 +++$+++ Interesting. No big deal really, I was just curious.-- +++$+++ :Interesting. No big deal really, I was just curious.--[[User:Cyrus Andiron|<font face="Elephant"><font color="8B 00 00">Cy</font><font color="B2 22 22">ru</font><font color="DC 14 3C">s</font></font>]]  [[User talk:Cyrus Andiron|<font face="Elephant"><font color="DC 14 3C">An</font><font color="B2 22 22">dir</font><font color="8B 00 00">on</font></font>]] 01:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
20433 +++$+++ Cyrus Andiron +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20431 +++$+++ 20432 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.176366780E09 +++$+++ Evidently we've overloaded the system with the constant banter. I didn't put my name in the title, so how it got there is a mystery as well. Oh well, instability... what can you do. -- +++$+++ ::Evidently we've overloaded the system with the constant banter. I didn't put my name in the title, so how it got there is a mystery as well. Oh well, instability... what can you do. --[[User:Cyrus Andiron|<font face="Elephant"><font color="8B 00 00">Cy</font><font color="B2 22 22">ru</font><font color="DC 14 3C">s</font></font>]]  [[User talk:Cyrus Andiron|<font face="Elephant"><font color="DC 14 3C">An</font><font color="B2 22 22">dir</font><font color="8B 00 00">on</font></font>]] 01:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

611713 +++$+++ SUIT +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-30 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.164894480E09 +++$+++ Hey, you might be interested in [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=TBtpyeLxVkI&mode=related&search= this]. It's pretty funny... That's all, regards,--<font face=\"comic sans ms\"> +++$+++ Hey, you might be interested in [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBtpyeLxVkI&mode=related&search= this]. It's pretty funny... That's all, regards,--<font face="comic sans ms">[[User:SUIT|<font color="gold">'''SU'''</font><font color="silver">'''IT'''</font>]]</font> 05:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
611714 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611713 +++$+++ 611713 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.164948780E09 +++$+++ Over nine f***ing thousand!? Is this what the IP was asking about before on [[Talk:Vegeta|Vegeta's talk page]]!? That's hilarious!! Thanks for showing me! That really made my day a bit brighter. \/\/  +++$+++ :Over nine f***ing thousand!? Is this what the IP was asking about before on [[Talk:Vegeta|Vegeta's talk page]]!? That's hilarious!! Thanks for showing me! That really made my day a bit brighter. // [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuke'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sasuke-kun27|<font color="purple">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 20:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

20434 +++$+++ Dr who1975 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-13 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.176503340E09 +++$+++ You may want to clarify your remarks. You said you were in favor of keeping all succsession boxes when the debate was actually about keeping successionm boxes specifically for fictional characters.-- +++$+++ You may want to clarify your remarks. You said you were in favor of keeping all succsession boxes when the debate was actually about keeping successionm boxes specifically for fictional characters.--[[User:Dr who1975|Dr who1975]] 15:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
20435 +++$+++ Dr who1975 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20434 +++$+++ 20434 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.176519240E09 +++$+++ I think we're in agreement here. The existing rule that prohibits them from being used is open for abuse. I have some ideas for amending the rule which I may be forced to put forth soon but generally, I wish it would be removed in it's entirety.-- +++$+++ :I think we're in agreement here. The existing rule that prohibits them from being used is open for abuse. I have some ideas for amending the rule which I may be forced to put forth soon but generally, I wish it would be removed in it's entirety.--[[User:Dr who1975|Dr who1975]] 19:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

282580 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282580 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-07 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.247015520E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 18:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
282581 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282580 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-07-07 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.247017680E09 +++$+++ Haha! No way! You've listened to that meditation stuff too? Awesome! My favorite is the third video for some reason. Can't explain why. I'm working on a draft for [[Ancient Egyptian literature]] at the moment; perhaps you'll be interested in the part that explains the musical hymns of ancient Egypt (both religious and secular).--<strong> +++$+++ ::Haha! No way! You've listened to that meditation stuff too? Awesome! My favorite is the third video for some reason. Can't explain why. I'm working on a draft for [[Ancient Egyptian literature]] at the moment; perhaps you'll be interested in the part that explains the musical hymns of ancient Egypt (both religious and secular).--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 18:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

20437 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20437 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-17 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.176837120E09 +++$+++ You're not allowed to use the articles of Wikipedia to continue your personal wars with others editors. Stop reverting just for the sake of opposing me, or you'll be blocked.  +++$+++ You're not allowed to use the articles of Wikipedia to continue your personal wars with others editors. Stop reverting just for the sake of opposing me, or you'll be blocked. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 12:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
20438 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20437 +++$+++ 20437 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.176868260E09 +++$+++ I see you are not familiar with the rules of Wikipedia, therefore I inform you that the removal of vandalism (in our case, your adding of spam in external links and violation of the external links policy) doesn't count in 3RR. By the way, if you continue to vandalize the RAB article, you're going to get blocked.   +++$+++ :I see you are not familiar with the rules of Wikipedia, therefore I inform you that the removal of vandalism (in our case, your adding of spam in external links and violation of the external links policy) doesn't count in 3RR. By the way, if you continue to vandalize the RAB article, you're going to get blocked.  [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 20:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
20439 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20437 +++$+++ 20438 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.176868680E09 +++$+++ I think i should frame that one.  +++$+++ ::I think i should frame that one. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 20:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
20440 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20437 +++$+++ 20438 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.176872160E09 +++$+++ Anyway, as for the RAB is concerned, no ''reliable'' source proving the text is not merely the personal opinions and deductions of the contributor, no paragraph.  +++$+++ ::Anyway, as for the RAB is concerned, no ''reliable'' source proving the text is not merely the personal opinions and deductions of the contributor, no paragraph. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 21:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
20441 +++$+++ Princess Tiswas +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20437 +++$+++ 20437 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.176998520E09 +++$+++ It has been said often enough, but bears repeating. Wikipedia is no place for [[WP:NOR|original research]]. However, if a fact can be [[WP:|attributed]] to a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], it warrants inclusion (provided, with contentious issues, there is [[WP:NPOV|even handed]] coverage). For example, if Blog A reports that RAB is a small dog, and Website B reports that RAB has curly hair, you should not include it. But if The Daily News reports that RAB is a poodle, on the basis of those facts, that makes it fair game. Wikipedia is not concerned with the [[WP:TRUTH|truth]], but with [[WP:V|verifiablity]] -  +++$+++ :It has been said often enough, but bears repeating. Wikipedia is no place for [[WP:NOR|original research]]. However, if a fact can be [[WP:|attributed]] to a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], it warrants inclusion (provided, with contentious issues, there is [[WP:NPOV|even handed]] coverage). For example, if Blog A reports that RAB is a small dog, and Website B reports that RAB has curly hair, you should not include it. But if The Daily News reports that RAB is a poodle, on the basis of those facts, that makes it fair game. Wikipedia is not concerned with the [[WP:TRUTH|truth]], but with [[WP:V|verifiablity]] - [[User:Princess Tiswas|<span style="color:#006400">Tiswas</span>]]<sup><span style="color:#FF0000">([[User talk:Princess Tiswas|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Princess Tiswas|c]])</span></sup> 09:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

282582 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-07 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.246954500E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:HMS_Endeavour&diff=300582718&oldid=300580380] I think you meant thank  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:HMS_Endeavour&diff=300582718&oldid=300580380] I think you meant thank [[User:Euryalus]], not Moondyne.  Moondyne did nothing in the article space.  Would you mind fixing your comment? &ndash;[[User talk:Moondyne|Moondyne]] 01:15, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
282583 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282582 +++$+++ 282582 +++$+++ 2009-07-07 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.246954980E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Moondyne, for your correction - I do appreciate it, and will fix the note as you suggest. Please put it down to memory loss due to old age, fast living, and not drinking enough coffee. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thank you, Moondyne, for your correction - I do appreciate it, and will fix the note as you suggest. Please put it down to memory loss due to old age, fast living, and not drinking enough coffee. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 01:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

47097 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Canterbury Tail +++$+++ 47097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-07 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.278547380E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I'm popping by to let you know that your \"opinion\" (though clearly labeled) may have been misunderstood as some kind of administratorial decision, per action and edit summary [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Pope_Leo_XIII&action=historysubmit&diff=372238626&oldid=371334064 here]. I've reverted to no image pending a consensus (particularly given the still-active [[WP:RfC]] on the situation listed at [[Wikipedia talk:Images#Requesting comments]]) and attempted to clarify to [[User_talk:Xanderliptak#Pope_Leo_XIII|Xanderliptak]]. The last thing we need is another edit war prior to a nailing down of consensus. If I've misunderstood your position, please let me know. :) (It's such an oddly heated argument; it seems several of the contributors there are highly invested in the issue.) -- +++$+++ Anyway, I'm popping by to let you know that your "opinion" (though clearly labeled) may have been misunderstood as some kind of administratorial decision, per action and edit summary [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pope_Leo_XIII&action=historysubmit&diff=372238626&oldid=371334064 here]. I've reverted to no image pending a consensus (particularly given the still-active [[WP:RfC]] on the situation listed at [[Wikipedia talk:Images#Requesting comments]]) and attempted to clarify to [[User_talk:Xanderliptak#Pope_Leo_XIII|Xanderliptak]]. The last thing we need is another edit war prior to a nailing down of consensus. If I've misunderstood your position, please let me know. :) (It's such an oddly heated argument; it seems several of the contributors there are highly invested in the issue.) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 17:03, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
47098 +++$+++ Canterbury Tail +++$+++ Canterbury Tail +++$+++ 47097 +++$+++ 47097 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.278554520E09 +++$+++ Yes, your right, my opinion has been misconstrued as an arbitration decision.  +++$+++ :Yes, your right, my opinion has been misconstrued as an arbitration decision. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<font color="Blue">'''Canterbury Tail'''</font>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|''<font color="Blue">talk</font>'']] 19:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
47099 +++$+++ Scolaire +++$+++ Canterbury Tail +++$+++ 47097 +++$+++ 47098 +++$+++ 2010-07-08 07:35:00 +++$+++ 1.278599700E09 +++$+++ I think [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3APope_Leo_XIII&action=historysubmit&diff=371363772&oldid=371333934 your post] was unwise for an admin. To name the section \"Arbitration\" suggests that you have the powers of an arbitrator, which I'm fairly sure you don't. To talk about \"a topic ban for everyone involved\", in a very brief edit-war that never even reach three reverts, was a rather exaggerated response to say the least - would you really ban me from all articles on historic Irish families ''and'' all articles on the papacy because I disputed a couple of images that are tangential to some articles? And then to say that you'd \"like to here [''sic''] a sensible story for why these are or aren't acceptable\" suggests that your mind is already made up, and anyone who disagrees with you had better be very careful. Perhaps you ought to give some thought to how you wield your broom in the future.   +++$+++ ::I think [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APope_Leo_XIII&action=historysubmit&diff=371363772&oldid=371333934 your post] was unwise for an admin. To name the section "Arbitration" suggests that you have the powers of an arbitrator, which I'm fairly sure you don't. To talk about "a topic ban for everyone involved", in a very brief edit-war that never even reach three reverts, was a rather exaggerated response to say the least - would you really ban me from all articles on historic Irish families ''and'' all articles on the papacy because I disputed a couple of images that are tangential to some articles? And then to say that you'd "like to here [''sic''] a sensible story for why these are or aren't acceptable" suggests that your mind is already made up, and anyone who disagrees with you had better be very careful. Perhaps you ought to give some thought to how you wield your broom in the future.  [[User:Scolaire|Scolaire]] ([[User talk:Scolaire|talk]]) 07:35, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
47100 +++$+++ Canterbury Tail +++$+++ Canterbury Tail +++$+++ 47097 +++$+++ 47099 +++$+++ 2010-07-08 11:41:00 +++$+++ 1.278614460E09 +++$+++ Your opinion is welcome. Fact is both sides asked me to get involved in it, though I didn't really want to. Also the topic ban bit was something I was considering bringing up on the Admin noticeboard for everyone involved as this was an edit war that was raging across many articles, not just this one, and causing a lot of disruption (though I was only going to ask with regards to heraldry, not anything else.) And no my mind wasn't made up, I just didn't want to have to wade through pages and pages of chatter when a succinct summation is more appropriate. A sensible story (maybe story is the wrong word) either way meaning something based on Wikipedia policies (as I mention elsewhere) rather than I don't like it, or I like it and don't like the original from both sides.  +++$+++ :::Your opinion is welcome. Fact is both sides asked me to get involved in it, though I didn't really want to. Also the topic ban bit was something I was considering bringing up on the Admin noticeboard for everyone involved as this was an edit war that was raging across many articles, not just this one, and causing a lot of disruption (though I was only going to ask with regards to heraldry, not anything else.) And no my mind wasn't made up, I just didn't want to have to wade through pages and pages of chatter when a succinct summation is more appropriate. A sensible story (maybe story is the wrong word) either way meaning something based on Wikipedia policies (as I mention elsewhere) rather than I don't like it, or I like it and don't like the original from both sides. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<font color="Blue">'''Canterbury Tail'''</font>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|''<font color="Blue">talk</font>'']] 11:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
47101 +++$+++ Scolaire +++$+++ Canterbury Tail +++$+++ 47097 +++$+++ 47100 +++$+++ 2010-07-08 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.278623700E09 +++$+++ So, just to be sure I have it right: if two or three editors who disagree about a random image get a bit heated and revert each other a couple of times on, say, half a dozen articles, this is \"an edit war...raging across many articles\", and the appropriate and obvious remedy is to topic ban \"everybody involved\", even though you have only warned two editors about edit-warring and one of them (remember which one?) immediately stops editing the affected articles? Yes, I certainly think you should bring this up on the Admin noticeboard, because it looks to me like a radical departure from accepted practice.   +++$+++ ::::So, just to be sure I have it right: if two or three editors who disagree about a random image get a bit heated and revert each other a couple of times on, say, half a dozen articles, this is "an edit war...raging across many articles", and the appropriate and obvious remedy is to topic ban "everybody involved", even though you have only warned two editors about edit-warring and one of them (remember which one?) immediately stops editing the affected articles? Yes, I certainly think you should bring this up on the Admin noticeboard, because it looks to me like a radical departure from accepted practice.  [[User:Scolaire|Scolaire]] ([[User talk:Scolaire|talk]]) 14:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
47102 +++$+++ Scolaire +++$+++ Canterbury Tail +++$+++ 47097 +++$+++ 47100 +++$+++ 2010-07-08 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.278624060E09 +++$+++ And no, I didn't say your mind was made up. I said that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3APope_Leo_XIII&action=historysubmit&diff=371363772&oldid=371333934 your post], taken as a whole, gives the ''impression'' of a mind already made up, and an implied threat of admin wrath towards anybody who dares cross you.   +++$+++ ::::And no, I didn't say your mind was made up. I said that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APope_Leo_XIII&action=historysubmit&diff=371363772&oldid=371333934 your post], taken as a whole, gives the ''impression'' of a mind already made up, and an implied threat of admin wrath towards anybody who dares cross you.  [[User:Scolaire|Scolaire]] ([[User talk:Scolaire|talk]]) 14:21, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

544729 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544729 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-07 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.197016920E09 +++$+++ I may need help dealing with this case: [[User_talk:EncycloPetey#Transhumanist_RfA_.26_Uncivility]] if the individual will not desist. -- +++$+++ I may need help dealing with this case: [[User_talk:EncycloPetey#Transhumanist_RfA_.26_Uncivility]] if the individual will not desist. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 00:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
544730 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544729 +++$+++ 544729 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.197017820E09 +++$+++ I have tried several times to activate my user e-mail, but have yet to successfully receive a message.  I am getting Wiktionary mail just fine, and through two of the lists I subcribe to, but not from Wikipedia or from a friend who has been trying to send to me.  I'm not sure if the failures are related. -- +++$+++ :I have tried several times to activate my user e-mail, but have yet to successfully receive a message.  I am getting Wiktionary mail just fine, and through two of the lists I subcribe to, but not from Wikipedia or from a friend who has been trying to send to me.  I'm not sure if the failures are related. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 00:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
544731 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544729 +++$+++ 544729 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.197077100E09 +++$+++ Please try sending a message once more.  I might have finally tracked down the problem. -- +++$+++ :Please try sending a message once more.  I might have finally tracked down the problem. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 17:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
544732 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544729 +++$+++ 544731 +++$+++ 2007-12-08 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.197101940E09 +++$+++ Yes, the test worked this time, thanks. -- +++$+++ ::Yes, the test worked this time, thanks. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 00:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

282590 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-30 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.248967560E09 +++$+++ Glad you like Chopin!! +++$+++ Glad you like Chopin!![[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 08:26, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
282591 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282590 +++$+++ 282590 +++$+++ 2009-07-30 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.248957780E09 +++$+++ Getting it up and started, on a firm grounding and reaching critical mass is the trick. Surely we have some educators amongst the editors who would  run with the idea with enthusiasm? I'm too old and sore myself to do much running these days ;^) but, hopefully some of you energetic younger sparks can provide the energy and direction needed????? Here's hoping!  +++$+++ :Getting it up and started, on a firm grounding and reaching critical mass is the trick. Surely we have some educators amongst the editors who would  run with the idea with enthusiasm? I'm too old and sore myself to do much running these days ;^) but, hopefully some of you energetic younger sparks can provide the energy and direction needed????? Here's hoping! [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 05:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

544736 +++$+++ Elonka +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-07 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.197096660E09 +++$+++ Tom Cruise, eh?  Well, I'd rather that the rumors were about me and Brad Pitt, but I could probably handle it being Tom Cruise.  He does seem like the easier target, too.  ;) Could we compromise maybe, and spread rumors that I'm sleeping with both of them?  ;) You know, consensus and all that!  :) -- +++$+++ Tom Cruise, eh?  Well, I'd rather that the rumors were about me and Brad Pitt, but I could probably handle it being Tom Cruise.  He does seem like the easier target, too.  ;) Could we compromise maybe, and spread rumors that I'm sleeping with both of them?  ;) You know, consensus and all that!  :) --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 22:51, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
544737 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544736 +++$+++ 544736 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.197097920E09 +++$+++ Tom Cruise isn't where the link goes... :)  +++$+++ :Tom Cruise isn't where the link goes... :) [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]]  23:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

20450 +++$+++ Tuvas +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-18 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.179548760E09 +++$+++ Please don't make edits again on the section Deathly Hallows until a complete consensus has been made. Right now AFAIK, you are the only one of the major editors to the article that is totally in favor of including more information. There are parts of me that are in favor of adding some of the information, but anything would be very limited, and I think I'm the only one who would even consider that much, again, AFAIK. I must warn you however, due to your long history of debate over such subjects, that if you continue to add in content in that section unless it has been agreed in a consensus, then I will have to pursue further action, possibly even to the level of [[WP:RfC#Request comment on users|talking outside of the page]]. I understand your enthusiasm, I've also been involved in some edit wars, at least two of them which made it to WP:LAME, both of which I lost to a degree, and given the chance, I'd bring the debates right back up. But this much I will state, that I am most in favor of finding a way to please all involved parties, and if that can't be done, then I will go with the flow of people. I should also add that I'm not afraid to take further action if needed, although I don't want to do so. You have made many valuable contributions to many articles, and I really don't want to have to do something that might stop that, but this much I will have to add. Sometimes, you just have to let it go.  +++$+++ Please don't make edits again on the section Deathly Hallows until a complete consensus has been made. Right now AFAIK, you are the only one of the major editors to the article that is totally in favor of including more information. There are parts of me that are in favor of adding some of the information, but anything would be very limited, and I think I'm the only one who would even consider that much, again, AFAIK. I must warn you however, due to your long history of debate over such subjects, that if you continue to add in content in that section unless it has been agreed in a consensus, then I will have to pursue further action, possibly even to the level of [[WP:RfC#Request comment on users|talking outside of the page]]. I understand your enthusiasm, I've also been involved in some edit wars, at least two of them which made it to WP:LAME, both of which I lost to a degree, and given the chance, I'd bring the debates right back up. But this much I will state, that I am most in favor of finding a way to please all involved parties, and if that can't be done, then I will go with the flow of people. I should also add that I'm not afraid to take further action if needed, although I don't want to do so. You have made many valuable contributions to many articles, and I really don't want to have to do something that might stop that, but this much I will have to add. Sometimes, you just have to let it go. [[User:Tuvas|Tuvas]] 21:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
20451 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20450 +++$+++ 20450 +++$+++ 2007-06-04 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.180981740E09 +++$+++ Further to our continued debate on the talk page. I still do not consider that you answered my observation, that essentailly you were agreeing that the disputed content was admissable under wiki rules. I am therefore inclined to proceed on the assumption that you do agree this.  +++$+++ :Further to our continued debate on the talk page. I still do not consider that you answered my observation, that essentailly you were agreeing that the disputed content was admissable under wiki rules. I am therefore inclined to proceed on the assumption that you do agree this. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 11:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

282595 +++$+++ Euryalus +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282595 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-02 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.249280040E09 +++$+++ So the image can go back into the article, could I ask a favour and get you to edit its Commons page [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Endeavour_replica_in_Cooktown_harbour.jpg here], by cutting then re-pasting the \"Permissions\" text, or doing any similar edit to demonstrate that this is in fact the image you originally took and you're happy to release it into the public domain?  +++$+++ So the image can go back into the article, could I ask a favour and get you to edit its Commons page [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Endeavour_replica_in_Cooktown_harbour.jpg here], by cutting then re-pasting the "Permissions" text, or doing any similar edit to demonstrate that this is in fact the image you originally took and you're happy to release it into the public domain? [[User:Euryalus|Euryalus]] ([[User talk:Euryalus|talk]]) 23:14, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
282596 +++$+++ Euryalus +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282595 +++$+++ 282595 +++$+++ 2009-08-03 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.249296660E09 +++$+++ And in hindsight I don't really care what the article title is :)  +++$+++ :And in hindsight I don't really care what the article title is :) [[User:Euryalus|Euryalus]] ([[User talk:Euryalus|talk]]) 03:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

20452 +++$+++ John Reaves +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-18 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.179550620E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure what \"notice you referted by restoration\" is supposed to mean. --  +++$+++ I'm not sure what "notice you referted by restoration" is supposed to mean. -- [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 21:57, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
20453 +++$+++ John Reaves +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20452 +++$+++ 20452 +++$+++ 2007-05-18 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.179554280E09 +++$+++ There is plenty of explanation at [[WT:WPHP]], I'm not sure what you don't understand.  Simply put, it's an abuse of copyright. --  +++$+++ :There is plenty of explanation at [[WT:WPHP]], I'm not sure what you don't understand.  Simply put, it's an abuse of copyright. -- [[User:John Reaves|John Reaves]] [[User talk:John Reaves|(talk)]] 22:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

282597 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-03 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.249300320E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for all the work - I am really happy to see the photo on the page where it is. I, also, in hindsight don't really care what name is used for the article - both names are there and properly cross-referenced with redirects - so there should be no problem - except maybe from some Cooktown residents who tend to feel quite strongly about it. An even worse sin here is to refer to James Cook, when he was here on his first voyage, as \"Captain Cook\". You can say \"the captain of the Endeavour, James Cook\" - but NEVER use \"captain\" as his title here or you will be written off as an ignoramus. I am just warning you in case you ever visit Cooktown. Otherwise the locals tend to be quite friendly - so don't be put off - I'd love to meet you and show you around our beautiful slice of paradise! Cheers,  +++$+++ Thanks a lot for all the work - I am really happy to see the photo on the page where it is. I, also, in hindsight don't really care what name is used for the article - both names are there and properly cross-referenced with redirects - so there should be no problem - except maybe from some Cooktown residents who tend to feel quite strongly about it. An even worse sin here is to refer to James Cook, when he was here on his first voyage, as "Captain Cook". You can say "the captain of the Endeavour, James Cook" - but NEVER use "captain" as his title here or you will be written off as an ignoramus. I am just warning you in case you ever visit Cooktown. Otherwise the locals tend to be quite friendly - so don't be put off - I'd love to meet you and show you around our beautiful slice of paradise! Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 04:52, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
282598 +++$+++ Euryalus +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282597 +++$+++ 282597 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 05:50:00 +++$+++ 1.249563000E09 +++$+++ Sounds good,and thanks for the advice on how to avoid a Cooktown pub fight. Queenslanders are always friendly but there's minefields in local topics we southerners never quite understand. :) [[Cooktown, Queensland|Cooktown]] looks great - if I'm ever up your way I'll certainly stop by to say hi. And especially if the [[:File:Jensens Crossing fish survey Dec07 029.jpg|fishing stays good]]. --  +++$+++ :Sounds good,and thanks for the advice on how to avoid a Cooktown pub fight. Queenslanders are always friendly but there's minefields in local topics we southerners never quite understand. :) [[Cooktown, Queensland|Cooktown]] looks great - if I'm ever up your way I'll certainly stop by to say hi. And especially if the [[:File:Jensens Crossing fish survey Dec07 029.jpg|fishing stays good]]. -- [[User:Euryalus|Euryalus]] ([[User talk:Euryalus|talk]]) 05:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

544742 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544742 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-09 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.197258660E09 +++$+++ Hey Tim. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Nicotinamide_adenine_dinucleotide&curid=365558&diff=176833710&oldid=176686974 Care for some SVG]? :)  +++$+++ Hey Tim. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicotinamide_adenine_dinucleotide&curid=365558&diff=176833710&oldid=176686974 Care for some SVG]? :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 19:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
544743 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544742 +++$+++ 544742 +++$+++ 2007-12-09 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.197269340E09 +++$+++ Excellent. I'll see if I can get to the others between today and tomorrow, and then actually ''read'' the article so I can comment at FAC.  +++$+++ :Excellent. I'll see if I can get to the others between today and tomorrow, and then actually ''read'' the article so I can comment at FAC. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 22:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

282599 +++$+++ 119.152.247.198 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-06 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.249601820E09 +++$+++ In the article lead, \"Kuchi refers to robbers\" was added in the last version, which breaches the formal tone in an encyclopedia, was it to show pure racist hatred? Since it was not sourced, I removed it, and I added sources from nps and UNHCR etc. I think the article can be further expanded, and sections regarding land, carpets and rugs etc. can be added using [http:\/\/www.unhcr.org\/cgi-bin\/texis\/vtx\/search?page=search&docid=46c993942&query=kuchi this source] and other similar sources (some can be found [http:\/\/www.unhcr.org\/cgi-bin\/texis\/vtx\/search?page=search&query=kuchi here]) in citations - it will be great for the article. -[[Special:Contributions\/119.152.247.198|119.152.247.198]] ( +++$+++ In the article lead, "Kuchi refers to robbers" was added in the last version, which breaches the formal tone in an encyclopedia, was it to show pure racist hatred? Since it was not sourced, I removed it, and I added sources from nps and UNHCR etc. I think the article can be further expanded, and sections regarding land, carpets and rugs etc. can be added using [http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/search?page=search&docid=46c993942&query=kuchi this source] and other similar sources (some can be found [http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/search?page=search&query=kuchi here]) in citations - it will be great for the article. -[[Special:Contributions/119.152.247.198|119.152.247.198]] ([[User talk:119.152.247.198|talk]]) 16:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
282600 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282599 +++$+++ 282599 +++$+++ 2009-08-06 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.249608960E09 +++$+++ '''[[Ancient Egyptian literature]]'''. Enjoy that. ;)--<strong> +++$+++ *'''[[Ancient Egyptian literature]]'''. Enjoy that. ;)--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 18:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

544744 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544744 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-08 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.197108660E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Eubulides&diff=prev&oldid=176490604].   +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eubulides&diff=prev&oldid=176490604].  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
544745 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544744 +++$+++ 544744 +++$+++ 2007-12-10 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.197355920E09 +++$+++ Vandalism with citations; that's a good one :-)  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Coprolalia&diff=177083520&oldid=176274583]   +++$+++ :Vandalism with citations; that's a good one :-)  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coprolalia&diff=177083520&oldid=176274583]  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
544746 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544744 +++$+++ 544745 +++$+++ 2007-12-10 23:01:00 +++$+++ 1.197356460E09 +++$+++ Never mind, Tito and Joel already got there.  Best regards,  +++$+++ ::Never mind, Tito and Joel already got there.  Best regards, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

282601 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-06 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.249609080E09 +++$+++ [[:File:13 th Dalai Lama Nechung retreat.JPG]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:13 th Dalai Lama Nechung retreat.JPG]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:13 th Dalai Lama Nechung retreat.JPG]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:File:13 th Dalai Lama Nechung retreat.JPG]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:13 th Dalai Lama Nechung retreat.JPG]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:13 th Dalai Lama Nechung retreat.JPG]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 18:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
282602 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282601 +++$+++ 282601 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.257832080E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Tara, Gyantse Kumbum.JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Tara, Gyantse Kumbum.JPG]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Tara, Gyantse Kumbum.JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Tara, Gyantse Kumbum.JPG]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 21:48, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
282603 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282601 +++$+++ 282601 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.257832140E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Tara, Gyantse Kumbum.JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Tara, Gyantse Kumbum.JPG]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:Tara, Gyantse Kumbum.JPG]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:Tara, Gyantse Kumbum.JPG]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 21:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

20459 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-06 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.173171000E09 +++$+++ You have obviously played alone, and you have used an insidious trick to get me out of the way, and Wikipedia doesn't work like that.  +++$+++ You have obviously played alone, and you have used an insidious trick to get me out of the way, and Wikipedia doesn't work like that. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 00:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
20460 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20459 +++$+++ 20459 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.173196200E09 +++$+++ I have said the article (if there has to be a need to be thorough about other unrelated hallows in an HP article) needed to have literary refs to other forms of hallows.  +++$+++ :I have said the article (if there has to be a need to be thorough about other unrelated hallows in an HP article) needed to have literary refs to other forms of hallows. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 07:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

282604 +++$+++ 98.119.158.59 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-07 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.249637340E09 +++$+++ Are you saying that Qing is China? [[Special:Contributions\/98.119.158.59|98.119.158.59]] ( +++$+++ Are you saying that Qing is China? [[Special:Contributions/98.119.158.59|98.119.158.59]] ([[User talk:98.119.158.59|talk]]) 02:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
282605 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282604 +++$+++ 282604 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 05:37:00 +++$+++ 1.249648620E09 +++$+++ No, I never substituted Qing for China, only for Manchu. I was implying the true situation, that by the 19th century the Qing could no longer be fairly described simply as Manchus - they had become highly assimilated and had been the rulers of China for over 250 years. The Qing rulers had not only intermarried with Chinese people but they had taken on Chinese language and culture. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :No, I never substituted Qing for China, only for Manchu. I was implying the true situation, that by the 19th century the Qing could no longer be fairly described simply as Manchus - they had become highly assimilated and had been the rulers of China for over 250 years. The Qing rulers had not only intermarried with Chinese people but they had taken on Chinese language and culture. Sincerely, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 05:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
282606 +++$+++ 98.119.158.59 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282604 +++$+++ 282605 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.249650660E09 +++$+++ Oop, I didn't point out my real question. Because you wrote that ''dynasty ruling China at the time'', and there're countless people who would say this. I wonder why. Because Qing didn't only ruled China but also Manchuria, Tibet, Taiwan, Mongolia, and Uyghur. Qing is NOT China but a Manchu Empire, same as Yuan, which is a Mongol Empire. People say Qing is China is nothing but a history distortion. China was just one of the colonies of Qing. Cheer. [[Special:Contributions\/98.119.158.59|98.119.158.59]] ( +++$+++ ::Oop, I didn't point out my real question. Because you wrote that ''dynasty ruling China at the time'', and there're countless people who would say this. I wonder why. Because Qing didn't only ruled China but also Manchuria, Tibet, Taiwan, Mongolia, and Uyghur. Qing is NOT China but a Manchu Empire, same as Yuan, which is a Mongol Empire. People say Qing is China is nothing but a history distortion. China was just one of the colonies of Qing. Cheer. [[Special:Contributions/98.119.158.59|98.119.158.59]] ([[User talk:98.119.158.59|talk]]) 06:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
282607 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282604 +++$+++ 282604 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.249651800E09 +++$+++ Hi again! You are quite correct - too often the other parts of the Qing Empire are referred to as parts of the \"Chinese\" Empire - and this view has been often used to justify Chinese control of those regions. But, on the other hand, it is important to not forget that the influences certainly went both ways and the later Qing rulers were highly [[sinicize]]d, if not [[sinophile]]s and sinocentric (if you will excuse the last term which I have just made up). ;^) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi again! You are quite correct - too often the other parts of the Qing Empire are referred to as parts of the "Chinese" Empire - and this view has been often used to justify Chinese control of those regions. But, on the other hand, it is important to not forget that the influences certainly went both ways and the later Qing rulers were highly [[sinicize]]d, if not [[sinophile]]s and sinocentric (if you will excuse the last term which I have just made up). ;^) Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 06:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
282608 +++$+++ 98.119.158.59 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282604 +++$+++ 282607 +++$+++ 2009-08-07 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.249653060E09 +++$+++ Got it. One last thing, if you haven't watch these [http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/profile?user=realtruehistory&view=videos video], I would like you to watch all of them. Cheer. [[Special:Contributions\/98.119.158.59|98.119.158.59]] ( +++$+++ ::Got it. One last thing, if you haven't watch these [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=realtruehistory&view=videos video], I would like you to watch all of them. Cheer. [[Special:Contributions/98.119.158.59|98.119.158.59]] ([[User talk:98.119.158.59|talk]]) 06:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

544749 +++$+++ Macdonald-ross +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-11 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.197445200E09 +++$+++ Well, I want to make a small edit more, and add some more refs, but I'll get back to that tomorrow as it's pretty late here. Thanks for asking.  +++$+++ Well, I want to make a small edit more, and add some more refs, but I'll get back to that tomorrow as it's pretty late here. Thanks for asking. [[User:Macdonald-ross|Macdonald-ross]] ([[User talk:Macdonald-ross|talk]]) 23:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
544750 +++$+++ Macdonald-ross +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544749 +++$+++ 544749 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.197473520E09 +++$+++ And, next morning, I'm with it now! Thank you for the info and corrections.   +++$+++ :And, next morning, I'm with it now! Thank you for the info and corrections.  [[User:Macdonald-ross|Macdonald-ross]] ([[User talk:Macdonald-ross|talk]]) 07:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

20462 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20462 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.173602040E09 +++$+++ Please keep this in mind when you'll contribute to the talk page. I really ''don't'' want to have to give you proper warnings, but I don't want you to continue to use insidious methods in place of arguments either. Stop this before it becomes too serious.  +++$+++ Please keep this in mind when you'll contribute to the talk page. I really ''don't'' want to have to give you proper warnings, but I don't want you to continue to use insidious methods in place of arguments either. Stop this before it becomes too serious. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 00:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
20463 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20462 +++$+++ 20462 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.173762240E09 +++$+++ You have made errors in understanding original postings, you have ignored any improvement I requested, and I certainly didn't say what you pretend I said. I said it was good ''but'' needed improvement, instead of adressing my remarks you merely tried to insert your text. Doing that without even trying to add whatever text was needed was a mark of disrespect, which then prompted my total disagreement, besides still having reclamations about the text. Then I saw what were your arguments and how I was right to object to the edit, seeing what you had in mind when writing it.  +++$+++ :You have made errors in understanding original postings, you have ignored any improvement I requested, and I certainly didn't say what you pretend I said. I said it was good ''but'' needed improvement, instead of adressing my remarks you merely tried to insert your text. Doing that without even trying to add whatever text was needed was a mark of disrespect, which then prompted my total disagreement, besides still having reclamations about the text. Then I saw what were your arguments and how I was right to object to the edit, seeing what you had in mind when writing it. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 22:04, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
20464 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20462 +++$+++ 20463 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.173818640E09 +++$+++ One last thing : it's your proposed text, it's you who have to improve it. So either you take into account others' opinion, or you don't, and in that case you don't propose anything.  +++$+++ ::One last thing : it's your proposed text, it's you who have to improve it. So either you take into account others' opinion, or you don't, and in that case you don't propose anything. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 13:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
20465 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20462 +++$+++ 20464 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.173839220E09 +++$+++ Well, you're wrong on this one, and you know it. WP doesn't report unsubstanciated theories.  +++$+++ :::Well, you're wrong on this one, and you know it. WP doesn't report unsubstanciated theories. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 19:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

544752 +++$+++ Macdonald-ross +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544752 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-12 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.197476520E09 +++$+++ Finally, I checked with articles Plastid, Mitochondria and Mitochondrial genome, and see they all use the term 'genome', and that there is no suggestion that they have 'chromosomes'. So may we at least get rid of that usage on the Chromosome article?   +++$+++ Finally, I checked with articles Plastid, Mitochondria and Mitochondrial genome, and see they all use the term 'genome', and that there is no suggestion that they have 'chromosomes'. So may we at least get rid of that usage on the Chromosome article?  [[User:Macdonald-ross|Macdonald-ross]] ([[User talk:Macdonald-ross|talk]]) 08:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
544753 +++$+++ Macdonald-ross +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544752 +++$+++ 544752 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.197510960E09 +++$+++ Mmm, I'm quite stunned by the new stuff on organelle nucleoids... it seems they each use different proteins for binding and regulating DNA. That'll be a tough one for evolutionary theorists to interpret! Thank you for introducing me to a whole new world.   +++$+++ :Mmm, I'm quite stunned by the new stuff on organelle nucleoids... it seems they each use different proteins for binding and regulating DNA. That'll be a tough one for evolutionary theorists to interpret! Thank you for introducing me to a whole new world.  [[User:Macdonald-ross|Macdonald-ross]] ([[User talk:Macdonald-ross|talk]]) 17:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

90792 +++$+++ Mick gold +++$+++ DCGeist +++$+++ 90792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-15 08:15:00 +++$+++ 1.284563700E09 +++$+++ After the [[fiasco|excitement of our first nom]], we are [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/The_Basement_Tapes\/archive2|on the road again]].  +++$+++ After the [[fiasco|excitement of our first nom]], we are [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/The_Basement_Tapes/archive2|on the road again]]. [[User:Mick gold|Mick gold]] ([[User talk:Mick gold|talk]]) 08:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
90793 +++$+++ Mick gold +++$+++ DCGeist +++$+++ 90792 +++$+++ 90792 +++$+++ 2010-09-17 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.284786600E09 +++$+++ Dan, sorry to intrude. I'm puzzled where [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/The_Basement_Tapes\/archive2|Sandy's 'Oppose']] leaves us. Your opinion would be most welcome in the FAC.  +++$+++ :Dan, sorry to intrude. I'm puzzled where [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/The_Basement_Tapes/archive2|Sandy's 'Oppose']] leaves us. Your opinion would be most welcome in the FAC. [[User:Mick gold|Mick gold]] ([[User talk:Mick gold|talk]]) 22:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
90794 +++$+++ Mick gold +++$+++ DCGeist +++$+++ 90792 +++$+++ 90793 +++$+++ 2010-09-24 08:09:00 +++$+++ 1.285340940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for communiqu\xe9, I think I understand. Negotiating your way through FAC, there are plenty of academic, technical & political challenges. I think it's right the nominators had to find their way past the issues Sandy raised. I preferred the old version, but there's no doubt several editors (WesleyDodds, Kitchen Roll) as well as Sandy found it too long & listy. I was wondering if you'll declare Support for FAC, but any road (as they say in Manchester) your contribution has been great.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for communiqué, I think I understand. Negotiating your way through FAC, there are plenty of academic, technical & political challenges. I think it's right the nominators had to find their way past the issues Sandy raised. I preferred the old version, but there's no doubt several editors (WesleyDodds, Kitchen Roll) as well as Sandy found it too long & listy. I was wondering if you'll declare Support for FAC, but any road (as they say in Manchester) your contribution has been great. [[User:Mick gold|Mick gold]] ([[User talk:Mick gold|talk]]) 08:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
90795 +++$+++ Mick gold +++$+++ DCGeist +++$+++ 90792 +++$+++ 90794 +++$+++ 2010-09-24 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.285359600E09 +++$+++ I see your point & have done something, it seems odd to mention controversy about song that was not included (\"Memphis\"), but to omit the three that were. I noticed this point was in caption for sound clip \"Don't Ya Tell Henry\" & thought it should be in main text.  +++$+++ :::I see your point & have done something, it seems odd to mention controversy about song that was not included ("Memphis"), but to omit the three that were. I noticed this point was in caption for sound clip "Don't Ya Tell Henry" & thought it should be in main text. [[User:Mick gold|Mick gold]] ([[User talk:Mick gold|talk]]) 13:20, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

20466 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20466 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-07 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.176011640E09 +++$+++ And stop adding those source. +++$+++ And stop adding those source.[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 22:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
20467 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20466 +++$+++ 20466 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.176012780E09 +++$+++ It was in a news on Mugglenet, maybe it was even included in the article. People from WB or Bloomsbury or whatever just said these had nothing to do with JKR (you'll see there are a ''lot'' of titles registered, each more strange than the other, anyway).  +++$+++ :It was in a news on Mugglenet, maybe it was even included in the article. People from WB or Bloomsbury or whatever just said these had nothing to do with JKR (you'll see there are a ''lot'' of titles registered, each more strange than the other, anyway). [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 23:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
20468 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20466 +++$+++ 20466 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.176054180E09 +++$+++ What OR ? Do you know what OR is (well, of course you don't...) +++$+++ :What OR ? Do you know what OR is (well, of course you don't...)[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 10:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
20469 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20466 +++$+++ 20468 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.176055740E09 +++$+++ You forgot to say \"please\"... +++$+++ ::You forgot to say "please"...[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 11:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
20470 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20466 +++$+++ 20469 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 11:14:00 +++$+++ 1.176056040E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I assume such a word doesn't exist in your dictionary, so here it is: http:\/\/www.mugglenet.com\/app\/news\/full_story\/555.  +++$+++ :::Anyway, I assume such a word doesn't exist in your dictionary, so here it is: http://www.mugglenet.com/app/news/full_story/555. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 11:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
20471 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20466 +++$+++ 20470 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.176057060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::::[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 11:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
20472 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20466 +++$+++ 20471 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.176062580E09 +++$+++ Make a list of all the spare titles registered by WB if you want, but anyway don't force your own conclusions to the readers.  +++$+++ :::::Make a list of all the spare titles registered by WB if you want, but anyway don't force your own conclusions to the readers. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 13:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
20473 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20466 +++$+++ 20472 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.176079020E09 +++$+++ What is the relevance if we know these titles are only \"spares\", without any confirmation that the list also contains possible titles ? I can't see the point of including it here, unless you want to hint that the other \"hallows\" title could be the 2 ther choices, which would be your own opinion. I have no problem however with a complete list of spares that have been registered (maybe in the general HP article since it doesn't specifically concerns book 7). Besides, the aim of the section is the meaning of hallows, and other possible titles (moreover when we don't even know them) don't appear to be relevant there...I agree that if we ''knew'' these titles, it would bring \"something\" to the understanding of hallows, but since we don't even know them, I can't see where we would be going with this. +++$+++ ::::::What is the relevance if we know these titles are only "spares", without any confirmation that the list also contains possible titles ? I can't see the point of including it here, unless you want to hint that the other "hallows" title could be the 2 ther choices, which would be your own opinion. I have no problem however with a complete list of spares that have been registered (maybe in the general HP article since it doesn't specifically concerns book 7). Besides, the aim of the section is the meaning of hallows, and other possible titles (moreover when we don't even know them) don't appear to be relevant there...I agree that if we ''knew'' these titles, it would bring "something" to the understanding of hallows, but since we don't even know them, I can't see where we would be going with this.[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 17:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
20474 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20466 +++$+++ 20473 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.176079860E09 +++$+++ As you wrote it previously it was too subjective, but a possible acceptable wording could be \"among various titles that have been registered by WB [include examples or full list + anyway a link to the list], it's worth noting that there is a \"Hallows of Hogwarts\". However, website Mugglenet was told by representatives of JKR that these titles were \"never contenders for book 7 etc\".  +++$+++ :::::::As you wrote it previously it was too subjective, but a possible acceptable wording could be "among various titles that have been registered by WB [include examples or full list + anyway a link to the list], it's worth noting that there is a "Hallows of Hogwarts". However, website Mugglenet was told by representatives of JKR that these titles were "never contenders for book 7 etc". [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 17:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

282612 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282612 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-14 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.250287920E09 +++$+++ You may not have noticed but thanks to your cabin stoway article I expanded the article on [[Saint-Gilles-Croix-de-Vie]] and it is currently on the main page! +++$+++ You may not have noticed but thanks to your cabin stoway article I expanded the article on [[Saint-Gilles-Croix-de-Vie]] and it is currently on the main page![[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 15:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
282613 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282612 +++$+++ 282612 +++$+++ 2009-08-14 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.250315400E09 +++$+++ I was just having look at it all and realised I must expand the very brief article on [[Narcisse Pelletier]]. I have been following his fascinating story for several years now and have all the main sources in English and French available here. It is just a matter of time and energy. Will try to get to it soon. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I was just having look at it all and realised I must expand the very brief article on [[Narcisse Pelletier]]. I have been following his fascinating story for several years now and have all the main sources in English and French available here. It is just a matter of time and energy. Will try to get to it soon. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

544757 +++$+++ RepublicanJacobite +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544757 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-13 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.197595980E09 +++$+++ I am hoping that you may know more about WP 1.0 than I do, 'cause I know next to nothing on the matter.  All I know is that the top third of the [[Talk:Johnny Cash]] page is now filled with information about the project.  I know that it was not this way a few days ago, because I have been doing a lot of editing work on that page this week.  At any rate, to make a long story short, is there a way to limit that information?  Has the template been changed recently?  I am all at sea here. ---<font face=\"Celtic\"> +++$+++ I am hoping that you may know more about WP 1.0 than I do, 'cause I know next to nothing on the matter.  All I know is that the top third of the [[Talk:Johnny Cash]] page is now filled with information about the project.  I know that it was not this way a few days ago, because I have been doing a lot of editing work on that page this week.  At any rate, to make a long story short, is there a way to limit that information?  Has the template been changed recently?  I am all at sea here. ---<font face="Celtic">[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 17:33, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
544758 +++$+++ RepublicanJacobite +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544757 +++$+++ 544757 +++$+++ 2007-12-13 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.197601860E09 +++$+++ I thank you for your response, and your action on this matter.  I will watch for responses on the 1.0 talk page, and hope someone figures out what went wrong.  I decided to go ahead and leave a message with the project editor who placed the template in the first place, so he may be able to figure it out himself.  Thanks again for your time. ---<font face=\"Celtic\"> +++$+++ :I thank you for your response, and your action on this matter.  I will watch for responses on the 1.0 talk page, and hope someone figures out what went wrong.  I decided to go ahead and leave a message with the project editor who placed the template in the first place, so he may be able to figure it out himself.  Thanks again for your time. ---<font face="Celtic">[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 19:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

544760 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544760 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-13 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.197590100E09 +++$+++ Ironic that you should have asked me about that last night. This [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Animal_testing&diff=177599042&oldid=177598902 diff] happened about 3 hours later, followed by [[Talk:Animal_testing#Editing]]. I'm not expecting you to do anything abut it, SV is well-known for this, but the timing was too good not to mention. All the best  +++$+++ Ironic that you should have asked me about that last night. This [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Animal_testing&diff=177599042&oldid=177598902 diff] happened about 3 hours later, followed by [[Talk:Animal_testing#Editing]]. I'm not expecting you to do anything abut it, SV is well-known for this, but the timing was too good not to mention. All the best [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 15:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
544761 +++$+++ Cla68 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544760 +++$+++ 544760 +++$+++ 2007-12-14 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.197619620E09 +++$+++ Unbelievable.  I guess we're supposed to feel fortunate that she deigns to allow us to edit ''her'' wiki.  +++$+++ :Unbelievable.  I guess we're supposed to feel fortunate that she deigns to allow us to edit ''her'' wiki. [[User:Cla68|Cla68]] ([[User talk:Cla68|talk]]) 00:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

533153 +++$+++ Tubesship +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533153 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-26 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.206543780E09 +++$+++ Mr. Tone, I just realize that it is written in the article [[Kosovo]]: \"''Kosova\" redirects here. For other uses, see Kosova (disambiguation).'' but that is not the case as when I type [[Kosova]] it does redirect me to \"[[Kosova (disambiguation)]] and not to [[Kosovo]]\". So I would appreciate your help, Sir. -- +++$+++ Mr. Tone, I just realize that it is written in the article [[Kosovo]]: "''Kosova" redirects here. For other uses, see Kosova (disambiguation).'' but that is not the case as when I type [[Kosova]] it does redirect me to "[[Kosova (disambiguation)]] and not to [[Kosovo]]". So I would appreciate your help, Sir. --[[User:Tubesship|Tubesship]] ([[User talk:Tubesship|talk]]) 08:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
533154 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533153 +++$+++ 533153 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 08:50:00 +++$+++ 1.206546600E09 +++$+++ Hi. Let's wait for the discussion on the talkpage to develop, then we can fix all the links in a way everyone is fine with it. Don't worry, I won't forget. Greetings. --''' +++$+++ : Hi. Let's wait for the discussion on the talkpage to develop, then we can fix all the links in a way everyone is fine with it. Don't worry, I won't forget. Greetings. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
533155 +++$+++ Tubesship +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533153 +++$+++ 533154 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.206563880E09 +++$+++ Sir, thank you, Sir. -- +++$+++ ::Sir, thank you, Sir. --[[User:Tubesship|Tubesship]] ([[User talk:Tubesship|talk]]) 13:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

20475 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20475 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-12 07:56:00 +++$+++ 1.176389760E09 +++$+++ And if you really want to include this theory, find a reliable 3rd party source like a newspaper which reports it.  +++$+++ And if you really want to include this theory, find a reliable 3rd party source like a newspaper which reports it. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 07:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
20476 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20475 +++$+++ 20475 +++$+++ 2007-04-12 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.176405180E09 +++$+++ Please stop being stubborn, I've let you add this little note, so now let me make it rules-compliant, otherwise it will quickly disappear, and you can be sure no one will object this.   +++$+++ :Please stop being stubborn, I've let you add this little note, so now let me make it rules-compliant, otherwise it will quickly disappear, and you can be sure no one will object this.  [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 12:13, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
20477 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20475 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 10:29:00 +++$+++ 1.176485340E09 +++$+++ Now, unless you have a reliable source confirming these titles have any relevance, don't edit this section anymore.  +++$+++ :::Now, unless you have a reliable source confirming these titles have any relevance, don't edit this section anymore. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 10:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

20478 +++$+++ Causesobad +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20478 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-28 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.177802280E09 +++$+++ Hi Sandpiper. I\u2019ve seen you reinsert your comment on FdF name and I decide not to delete it again, because if I do that I will pack myself up in the mussy cycle that you and other people are entangled in. To put it bluntly, I have to say that I don\u2019t agree with both of you: you and Folken de Fanel. Folken\u2019s behavior, in fact, is  rather unacceptable as he becomes more and more disruptive and annoying. He shouldn\u2019t have considered your comment as offense and your comment shows no signs of insult, I know that. But you also shouldn\u2019t have brought it out in Severus Snape talk page and together with other editors continuously restored the text. The action just makes the situation and the relationship among wikipedians get worse. Folken is wrong when he behaved like that, but you can\u2019t insist that you\u2019re 100% right. You yourself know the comment is completely off-topic and it doesn\u2019t  belong to the prolonged \u201cOR\u201d issue. That\u2019s the reason why I removed it. Why do you still make every effort adding it? It seems that 3 months of debate with Folken have made a calm and judicious editor like you become somewhat aggressive and short-tempered, as from my objective viewpoint. I wonder why you (include you, Folken, MS, JR) don\u2019t bring this problem to [[WP:RFAR|request for arbitration]] and do some other things constructive and useful for Wikipedia instead (Wikipedia doesn\u2019t just limit in RAB or Regulus Black or Deathly hallows), rather than plunge into a gallimaufry of \u201cdiscussion\u201d and 3RR, which lead to nothing except for the breakage in relationship. Again, I don\u2019t agree with your restoration of the comment on FdF because it not only plays no role in solving the problem and is totally off the track, but also a kind of action of adding fuel to the flames. I assume before that you didn\u2019t leave an edit summary like \u201c''[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Regulus_Black&diff=126344090&oldid=126240020 edit a bit]\u201d'', right? Be yourself, Sandpiper.  +++$+++ Hi Sandpiper. I’ve seen you reinsert your comment on FdF name and I decide not to delete it again, because if I do that I will pack myself up in the mussy cycle that you and other people are entangled in. To put it bluntly, I have to say that I don’t agree with both of you: you and Folken de Fanel. Folken’s behavior, in fact, is  rather unacceptable as he becomes more and more disruptive and annoying. He shouldn’t have considered your comment as offense and your comment shows no signs of insult, I know that. But you also shouldn’t have brought it out in Severus Snape talk page and together with other editors continuously restored the text. The action just makes the situation and the relationship among wikipedians get worse. Folken is wrong when he behaved like that, but you can’t insist that you’re 100% right. You yourself know the comment is completely off-topic and it doesn’t  belong to the prolonged “OR” issue. That’s the reason why I removed it. Why do you still make every effort adding it? It seems that 3 months of debate with Folken have made a calm and judicious editor like you become somewhat aggressive and short-tempered, as from my objective viewpoint. I wonder why you (include you, Folken, MS, JR) don’t bring this problem to [[WP:RFAR|request for arbitration]] and do some other things constructive and useful for Wikipedia instead (Wikipedia doesn’t just limit in RAB or Regulus Black or Deathly hallows), rather than plunge into a gallimaufry of “discussion” and 3RR, which lead to nothing except for the breakage in relationship. Again, I don’t agree with your restoration of the comment on FdF because it not only plays no role in solving the problem and is totally off the track, but also a kind of action of adding fuel to the flames. I assume before that you didn’t leave an edit summary like “''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Regulus_Black&diff=126344090&oldid=126240020 edit a bit]”'', right? Be yourself, Sandpiper. [[User:Causesobad|Causesobad]] → ([[User talk:Causesobad|Talk]]) 16:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
20479 +++$+++ Causesobad +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20478 +++$+++ 20478 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.178146140E09 +++$+++ P\/s: I have noticed many times you wrote some words whose suffix is \u201c-ful\u201d like \u201chelpful\u201d and \u201cfruitful\u201d into \u201c-full\u201d tagged (e.g [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment\/Kelly_Martin#Comment by Sandpiper|here]]). I wonder if it is a typing mistake or habitual misspelling or in your birthplace they write like that?  +++$+++ :P/s: I have noticed many times you wrote some words whose suffix is “-ful” like “helpful” and “fruitful” into “-full” tagged (e.g [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Kelly_Martin#Comment by Sandpiper|here]]). I wonder if it is a typing mistake or habitual misspelling or in your birthplace they write like that? [[User:Causesobad|Causesobad]] → ([[User talk:Causesobad|Talk]]) 15:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
20480 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20478 +++$+++ 20479 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.178169540E09 +++$+++ I can't say for sure on what Langford based his claim. I quoted what he wrote about it on the RAB talk page. He asserts that many people have come to this view, which is the point of referring to him, as an authority that it is indeed being debated. Personally, I don't see that this claim is ridiculous. There was considerable debate on the subject on the aformentioned websites at the time, still now, and there are now editorials saying the same sort of thing. naturally, if I thought he was wrong I would not be arguing in support of citing him. (An example of where editorial opinion legitimately influencces content.) But this issue of citing books about HP has only come about because Folken declines to accept the source websites as evidence that people are indeed discussing these issues. Never mind that the author recommended that readers should do so. I don't agree that it is inappropriate that we pass on her reommendations for sources about her books to readers. As a matter of course, i think any article should have some general refs indicating the best places to look for more information. Don't you?  +++$+++ ::I can't say for sure on what Langford based his claim. I quoted what he wrote about it on the RAB talk page. He asserts that many people have come to this view, which is the point of referring to him, as an authority that it is indeed being debated. Personally, I don't see that this claim is ridiculous. There was considerable debate on the subject on the aformentioned websites at the time, still now, and there are now editorials saying the same sort of thing. naturally, if I thought he was wrong I would not be arguing in support of citing him. (An example of where editorial opinion legitimately influencces content.) But this issue of citing books about HP has only come about because Folken declines to accept the source websites as evidence that people are indeed discussing these issues. Never mind that the author recommended that readers should do so. I don't agree that it is inappropriate that we pass on her reommendations for sources about her books to readers. As a matter of course, i think any article should have some general refs indicating the best places to look for more information. Don't you? [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 22:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

527701 +++$+++ Ssbohio +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-26 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.180174920E09 +++$+++ Greetings!  I've reviewed [[WP:CSD#I7]] and I don't see a clear reason why this image met that criterion.  I'd like to have your response on [[User talk:Ssbohio|my talk page]] if possible.  Thanks!  -- +++$+++ Greetings!  I've reviewed [[WP:CSD#I7]] and I don't see a clear reason why this image met that criterion.  I'd like to have your response on [[User talk:Ssbohio|my talk page]] if possible.  Thanks!  --[[User:Ssbohio|Ssbohio]] 03:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
527702 +++$+++ Ssbohio +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527701 +++$+++ 527701 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.180202640E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for the undeletion.  It's always nice to get what you want without even having to ask for it.  I'd still appreciate, though, if you could let me know how it met I7 when it was deleted, so I can improve the fair-use claim on this and any subsequent similarly-licensed images. -- +++$+++ :Thanks so much for the undeletion.  It's always nice to get what you want without even having to ask for it.  I'd still appreciate, though, if you could let me know how it met I7 when it was deleted, so I can improve the fair-use claim on this and any subsequent similarly-licensed images. --[[User:Ssbohio|Ssbohio]] 11:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

20482 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20482 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-06 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.178509740E09 +++$+++ \"So you say a discussion about why you can't include your POV refs, isn't \"immediately relevant\" to why you can't include your POV refs ? It seems you have not read well, or even that you don't want to read. So here is the link, again: [[Talk:Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows#The_meaning_of_.22Deathly_Hallows.22]] \"  +++$+++ "So you say a discussion about why you can't include your POV refs, isn't "immediately relevant" to why you can't include your POV refs ? It seems you have not read well, or even that you don't want to read. So here is the link, again: [[Talk:Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows#The_meaning_of_.22Deathly_Hallows.22]] " [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 20:49, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
20483 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20482 +++$+++ 20482 +++$+++ 2007-05-07 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.178562540E09 +++$+++ thanks for getting back, but I'm afraid I still feel you are not answering the question. You claimed the edits are NPOV. You claim that there are many other theories about the meaning of Deathly Hallows, so the ones I have referendced are pOV.  I'm afraid I must still insist that you demonstrate where these 'other' theories actually exist, otherwise I can only concluded that they are OR by yourself.  +++$+++ :thanks for getting back, but I'm afraid I still feel you are not answering the question. You claimed the edits are NPOV. You claim that there are many other theories about the meaning of Deathly Hallows, so the ones I have referendced are pOV.  I'm afraid I must still insist that you demonstrate where these 'other' theories actually exist, otherwise I can only concluded that they are OR by yourself. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 11:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

544771 +++$+++ AndrewGNF +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544771 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-15 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.197783960E09 +++$+++ Check out [[NEWENTRY]], but before you delete it, check out the NCBI links.  Looks like some sort of bizarre hack by NCBI...   +++$+++ Check out [[NEWENTRY]], but before you delete it, check out the NCBI links.  Looks like some sort of bizarre hack by NCBI...  [[User:AndrewGNF|AndrewGNF]] ([[User talk:AndrewGNF|talk]]) 21:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
544772 +++$+++ AndrewGNF +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544771 +++$+++ 544771 +++$+++ 2007-12-15 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.197785820E09 +++$+++ Nevermind, someone else got it.  Guess other admins are really on top of those CSDs.  Anyway, [http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/sites\/entrez?db=gene&cmd=retrieve&dopt=default&list_uids=192343&rn=1 nice gene], huh?   +++$+++ : Nevermind, someone else got it.  Guess other admins are really on top of those CSDs.  Anyway, [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=gene&cmd=retrieve&dopt=default&list_uids=192343&rn=1 nice gene], huh?  [[User:AndrewGNF|AndrewGNF]] ([[User talk:AndrewGNF|talk]]) 22:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

20484 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-07 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.178567820E09 +++$+++ \"So you say a discussion about why you can't include your POV refs, isn't \"immediately relevant\" to why you can't include your POV refs ? It seems you have not read well, or even that you don't want to read. So here is the link, again: [[Talk:Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows#The_meaning_of_.22Deathly_Hallows.22]] \"  +++$+++ "So you say a discussion about why you can't include your POV refs, isn't "immediately relevant" to why you can't include your POV refs ? It seems you have not read well, or even that you don't want to read. So here is the link, again: [[Talk:Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows#The_meaning_of_.22Deathly_Hallows.22]] " [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 12:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
20485 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20484 +++$+++ 20484 +++$+++ 2007-05-07 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.178574360E09 +++$+++ I see you reverted me once again, with the tag ''(an article from a national newspaper is NPOV. One self-published theory which happens to be the one you like, isn't NPOV. And it's a matter of what you think is true\/is not.) ''I don't disagree that a newspaper ref which merely says there is a debate is NPOV. However, it is also totally uninformative and unhelpfull to readers. I persist that you have produced no evidence that the refs I inserted are in any way not NPOV. I continue to suggest that to demonstrate that they are NPOV you must produce evidence that they do not fairly represent the debate on the title. I'm afraid I have seen nothing which supports your claim.  +++$+++ :I see you reverted me once again, with the tag ''(an article from a national newspaper is NPOV. One self-published theory which happens to be the one you like, isn't NPOV. And it's a matter of what you think is true/is not.) ''I don't disagree that a newspaper ref which merely says there is a debate is NPOV. However, it is also totally uninformative and unhelpfull to readers. I persist that you have produced no evidence that the refs I inserted are in any way not NPOV. I continue to suggest that to demonstrate that they are NPOV you must produce evidence that they do not fairly represent the debate on the title. I'm afraid I have seen nothing which supports your claim. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 14:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

20487 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20487 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-02 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.178112780E09 +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px|left]] }}}[[Wikipedia:Introduction|Welcome]] to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows|. It appears you have not followed this policy at [[:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows]]}}. Please always follow our [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|core policies]]. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- Template:uw-npov1 -->  +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px|left]] }}}[[Wikipedia:Introduction|Welcome]] to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows|. It appears you have not followed this policy at [[:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows]]}}. Please always follow our [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|core policies]]. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 06:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
20488 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20487 +++$+++ 20487 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 06:45:00 +++$+++ 1.178113500E09 +++$+++ Oh not another little tag? Please explain in what way my edits are not NPOV.  +++$+++ :Oh not another little tag? Please explain in what way my edits are not NPOV. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 06:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

20489 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20489 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-02 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.178116320E09 +++$+++ Read what I've written here and you'll know: [[Talk:Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows#The_meaning_of_.22Deathly_Hallows.22]]. +++$+++ Read what I've written here and you'll know: [[Talk:Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows#The_meaning_of_.22Deathly_Hallows.22]].[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 07:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
20490 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20489 +++$+++ 20489 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 07:41:00 +++$+++ 1.178116860E09 +++$+++ That doesnt say anything immediately relevant. Are you suggesting again that theories may not be included? This is incorrect, as you must know by now. Theories are entirely admissable content. The only issue is correctly representing them, as you said NPOV. I think I have a senssible NPOV presentation in the ref, but if you have refs showing a diverging POV, then please present them.  +++$+++ :That doesnt say anything immediately relevant. Are you suggesting again that theories may not be included? This is incorrect, as you must know by now. Theories are entirely admissable content. The only issue is correctly representing them, as you said NPOV. I think I have a senssible NPOV presentation in the ref, but if you have refs showing a diverging POV, then please present them. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 07:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
20491 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20489 +++$+++ 20490 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.178117400E09 +++$+++ It seems you have not read well, or even that you don't want to read. So here is the link, again: [[Talk:Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows#The_meaning_of_.22Deathly_Hallows.22]] +++$+++ ::It seems you have not read well, or even that you don't want to read. So here is the link, again: [[Talk:Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows#The_meaning_of_.22Deathly_Hallows.22]][[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 07:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
20492 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20489 +++$+++ 20490 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.178117460E09 +++$+++ Also, when you say Theories are entirely admissable content\", you're of course totally wrong. +++$+++ ::Also, when you say Theories are entirely admissable content", you're of course totally wrong.[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 07:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

282635 +++$+++ Chanakal +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282635 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-11 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.252666080E09 +++$+++ I didn't knew people from Sri Lanka migrated there as early as 1870. It is the popular belief that Sinhalese people didn't migrate overseas (unlike [[Non-resident Indian and Person of Indian Origin]]) for work except a little number of people going to Singapore to work in railway construction, if I recollect correctly. I was amused to hear that there were some Sri Lankan migrants in Mackay. Can you possibly say what has happened to them? Are there any information about them now? However nice talk to you again. Regards!--<font face=\"calibri\"> +++$+++ I didn't knew people from Sri Lanka migrated there as early as 1870. It is the popular belief that Sinhalese people didn't migrate overseas (unlike [[Non-resident Indian and Person of Indian Origin]]) for work except a little number of people going to Singapore to work in railway construction, if I recollect correctly. I was amused to hear that there were some Sri Lankan migrants in Mackay. Can you possibly say what has happened to them? Are there any information about them now? However nice talk to you again. Regards!--<font face="calibri">[[User:Chanakal|<font color="SteelBlue">'''Chanaka L'''</font>]] (<font color="Coral">[[User talk:Chanakal|talk]]</font>)</font> 03:48, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
282636 +++$+++ Chanakal +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282635 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-11 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.252668360E09 +++$+++ Thanks John for the quick response. Your reference explains it all. Only few of the descendants of original settlers still live. Keep your nice Tibetan Buddhism work up. Catcha later--<font face=\"calibri\"> +++$+++ ::Thanks John for the quick response. Your reference explains it all. Only few of the descendants of original settlers still live. Keep your nice Tibetan Buddhism work up. Catcha later--<font face="calibri">[[User:Chanakal|<font color="SteelBlue">'''Chanaka L'''</font>]] (<font color="Coral">[[User talk:Chanakal|talk]]</font>)</font> 04:26, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
282637 +++$+++ Chanakal +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282635 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-11 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.252668960E09 +++$+++ Please do visit our little island. I will keep in touch. Regards!--<font face=\"calibri\"> +++$+++ :::Please do visit our little island. I will keep in touch. Regards!--<font face="calibri">[[User:Chanakal|<font color="SteelBlue">'''Chanaka L'''</font>]] (<font color="Coral">[[User talk:Chanakal|talk]]</font>)</font> 04:36, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

440322 +++$+++ Mmxx +++$+++ Jujutacular +++$+++ 440322 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-23 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.311461520E09 +++$+++ Hi, I would like to know your opinion about [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates\/Photomontage (Forggensee Panorama)|this featured picture candidate]], I'm asking this because you have [[Wikipedia:Picture peer review\/Photomontage|reviewed]] the image about a year ago, I believe the image have very high EV and illustrate the [[photomontage]] and photoshopping very well, also it is one of the best [[photomontage]]s available. <span style=\"text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em grey\">''' +++$+++ Hi, I would like to know your opinion about [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Photomontage (Forggensee Panorama)|this featured picture candidate]], I'm asking this because you have [[Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Photomontage|reviewed]] the image about a year ago, I believe the image have very high EV and illustrate the [[photomontage]] and photoshopping very well, also it is one of the best [[photomontage]]s available. <span style="text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em grey">'''[[User:Mmxx|<span style='font-family:arial;color:#006;background-color:#E6E6FA'>&nbsp; ■ MMXX </span>]]'''<sup>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mmxx|''<span style='color: #006;'>talk</span>'']]&nbsp;</sup></span> 15:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
440323 +++$+++ Mmxx +++$+++ Jujutacular +++$+++ 440322 +++$+++ 440322 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.311474360E09 +++$+++ Hi, thank you for your comment and vote, I've uploaded a new version using [[:File:The_Earth_seen_from_Apollo_17.jpg|the Blue Marble]] which is closer to real colors, please tell your opinion about it at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates\/Photomontage (Forggensee Panorama)|FPC]], thank you. <span style=\"text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em grey\">''' +++$+++ :Hi, thank you for your comment and vote, I've uploaded a new version using [[:File:The_Earth_seen_from_Apollo_17.jpg|the Blue Marble]] which is closer to real colors, please tell your opinion about it at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Photomontage (Forggensee Panorama)|FPC]], thank you. <span style="text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em grey">'''[[User:Mmxx|<span style='font-family:arial;color:#006;background-color:#E6E6FA'>&nbsp; ■ MMXX </span>]]'''<sup>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mmxx|''<span style='color: #006;'>talk</span>'']]&nbsp;</sup></span> 19:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
440324 +++$+++ Jujutacular +++$+++ Jujutacular +++$+++ 440322 +++$+++ 440323 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.311474540E09 +++$+++ Very nice, thanks for the alt. I've left a vote in support. ''' +++$+++ ::Very nice, thanks for the alt. I've left a vote in support. '''[[User:Jujutacular|<span style="color:#006400;">Jujutacular</span>]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Jujutacular|talk]]</sup> 19:29, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
440325 +++$+++ Mmxx +++$+++ Jujutacular +++$+++ 440322 +++$+++ 440324 +++$+++ 2011-07-23 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311480120E09 +++$+++ Thank you. <span style=\"text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em grey\">''' +++$+++ :::Thank you. <span style="text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em grey">'''[[User:Mmxx|<span style='font-family:arial;color:#006;background-color:#E6E6FA'>&nbsp; ■ MMXX </span>]]'''<sup>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mmxx|''<span style='color: #006;'>talk</span>'']]&nbsp;</sup></span> 21:02, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

20494 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-22 08:37:00 +++$+++ 1.177256220E09 +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px|left]] }}}Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Talk:R.A.B.|, as you did here: [[:Talk:R.A.B.]]}}. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Remember you must not use Wikipedia to imply you know better than other editors about Harry Potter, more particularly when you try to use this in a content debate that you have lost. If you can find valid arguments, it's obvious you're wrong.<!-- Template:uw-npa1 -->  +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px|left]] }}}Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Talk:R.A.B.|, as you did here: [[:Talk:R.A.B.]]}}. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Remember you must not use Wikipedia to imply you know better than other editors about Harry Potter, more particularly when you try to use this in a content debate that you have lost. If you can find valid arguments, it's obvious you're wrong.<!-- Template:uw-npa1 --> [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 08:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
20495 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20494 +++$+++ 20494 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.177550460E09 +++$+++ I demand that you apologize for such false accusations.  +++$+++ :I demand that you apologize for such false accusations. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 18:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
20496 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20494 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.177557360E09 +++$+++ Having said that, I'm not quite sure why Funpika decided to revert you, perhaps because you had just blatantly broken 3RR again. He seems to have been running a vandal spotting tool, so I suppose it had just identified you.  +++$+++ :::Having said that, I'm not quite sure why Funpika decided to revert you, perhaps because you had just blatantly broken 3RR again. He seems to have been running a vandal spotting tool, so I suppose it had just identified you. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 20:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
20497 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20494 +++$+++ 20495 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.177559880E09 +++$+++ I had never broken 3RR. Funpika's revert was only a mistake, and you cannot invent false motivations to him. You're the vandal.  +++$+++ ::I had never broken 3RR. Funpika's revert was only a mistake, and you cannot invent false motivations to him. You're the vandal. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 20:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
20498 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20494 +++$+++ 20497 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.177563360E09 +++$+++ er, contrary to your expressed opinion that you have never broken 3RR, I think your bans and comments expressed on your talk page by other editors suggest that you have.  +++$+++ :::er, contrary to your expressed opinion that you have never broken 3RR, I think your bans and comments expressed on your talk page by other editors suggest that you have. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 21:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
20499 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20494 +++$+++ 20498 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.177564080E09 +++$+++ Reverting vandalism does not count in 3RR... +++$+++ ::::Reverting vandalism does not count in 3RR...[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 22:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
20500 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20494 +++$+++ 20495 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.177565580E09 +++$+++ Reverting vandalism does not count towards a 3RR violation, which shows that your behaviour was not considered to be 'reverting vandalism'. Perhaps you should think more about that.  +++$+++ ::Reverting vandalism does not count towards a 3RR violation, which shows that your behaviour was not considered to be 'reverting vandalism'. Perhaps you should think more about that. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 22:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
20501 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20494 +++$+++ 20499 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.177565820E09 +++$+++ I know what I reverted. The admin obviously didn't look at the edits...Before telling me to \"understand\" the rules (I understand them perfectly), try to read them, once in your life. +++$+++ :::::I know what I reverted. The admin obviously didn't look at the edits...Before telling me to "understand" the rules (I understand them perfectly), try to read them, once in your life.[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 22:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
20502 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20494 +++$+++ 20500 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.177566660E09 +++$+++ I think the comment  on your talk page shows that in fact three admins did not feel you were reverting vandalism. How many more opinions do you want?  +++$+++ :::I think the comment  on your talk page shows that in fact three admins did not feel you were reverting vandalism. How many more opinions do you want? [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 22:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
20503 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20494 +++$+++ 20501 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.177566780E09 +++$+++ I was reverting vandalism and that's a fact. Admins don't look at edits.  +++$+++ ::::::I was reverting vandalism and that's a fact. Admins don't look at edits. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 22:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

484013 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484013 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-01 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.199234700E09 +++$+++ He took his \"case\" to the notice board, giving you all a couple more IP addresses suitable for blocking. I also notified Luna Santin: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#unblock.28pardon.29_user:71.149.161.91]  +++$+++ He took his "case" to the notice board, giving you all a couple more IP addresses suitable for blocking. I also notified Luna Santin: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#unblock.28pardon.29_user:71.149.161.91] [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 16:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484014 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484013 +++$+++ 484013 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.199235120E09 +++$+++ I'm assuming all of this stems from this user [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Mosura] with whom I and someone else (also vandalized) were having a problem, on some Bhutto pages.  +++$+++ :I'm assuming all of this stems from this user [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mosura] with whom I and someone else (also vandalized) were having a problem, on some Bhutto pages. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 16:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484015 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484013 +++$+++ 484014 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.199235840E09 +++$+++ What link do you see to that account?  If it looks clear-cut, I'll block that one as well.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::What link do you see to that account?  If it looks clear-cut, I'll block that one as well.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 17:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484016 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484013 +++$+++ 484015 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.199237160E09 +++$+++ Only that he stopped editing a few hours before the time Eldorado started in earnest, and Eldorado vandalized other users who were in on the Bhutto discussion, WWGB and Joshdboz to name two. Other than that subject, I don't see where this is coming from. I doubt it was the Big Ten fans with whom I was having that semantics debate. It could just be random, of course.  +++$+++ :::Only that he stopped editing a few hours before the time Eldorado started in earnest, and Eldorado vandalized other users who were in on the Bhutto discussion, WWGB and Joshdboz to name two. Other than that subject, I don't see where this is coming from. I doubt it was the Big Ten fans with whom I was having that semantics debate. It could just be random, of course. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 17:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484017 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484013 +++$+++ 484016 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.199239680E09 +++$+++ To be honest, I'm not seeing much similarity except Bhutto, an article which has been on the front page since her death and therefore is going to attract a crowd.  Otherwise, Eldorado91 seems like a common childish vandal who probably should have been indefblocked a long time ago (at least around the time he vandalized [[User:Jimbo Wales]]), while Mosura is more of an edit warrior.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::::To be honest, I'm not seeing much similarity except Bhutto, an article which has been on the front page since her death and therefore is going to attract a crowd.  Otherwise, Eldorado91 seems like a common childish vandal who probably should have been indefblocked a long time ago (at least around the time he vandalized [[User:Jimbo Wales]]), while Mosura is more of an edit warrior.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 18:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
484018 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484013 +++$+++ 484017 +++$+++ 2008-01-01 21:49:00 +++$+++ 1.199252940E09 +++$+++ The editing style doesn't seem the same, that's true. I was trying to apply some logic to The Guilted One's activity. But that might be overthinking things. :)  +++$+++ :::::The editing style doesn't seem the same, that's true. I was trying to apply some logic to The Guilted One's activity. But that might be overthinking things. :) [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 21:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

282642 +++$+++ Ww2censor +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-17 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.253236200E09 +++$+++ Can you please fill out the missing details in the information box of [[:File:Zheng He's tomb, Nanjing.jpg]]? Thanks  +++$+++ Can you please fill out the missing details in the information box of [[:File:Zheng He's tomb, Nanjing.jpg]]? Thanks [[User:Ww2censor|ww2censor]] ([[User talk:Ww2censor|talk]]) 18:10, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
282643 +++$+++ Ww2censor +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282642 +++$+++ 282642 +++$+++ 2009-09-17 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.253257020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding but the description should be a description of the image. Otherwise it looks ok.  +++$+++ :Thanks for adding but the description should be a description of the image. Otherwise it looks ok. [[User:Ww2censor|ww2censor]] ([[User talk:Ww2censor|talk]]) 23:57, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
282644 +++$+++ Ww2censor +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282642 +++$+++ 282643 +++$+++ 2009-09-18 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.253265360E09 +++$+++ I refined your description edit. Cheers  +++$+++ ::I refined your description edit. Cheers [[User:Ww2censor|ww2censor]] ([[User talk:Ww2censor|talk]]) 02:16, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
282645 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282642 +++$+++ 282642 +++$+++ 2009-09-18 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.253268300E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for your kind assistance. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks so much for your kind assistance. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 03:05, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

541883 +++$+++ Ajcfreak +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.183616820E09 +++$+++ Hi there. Saw your post in Riana's talk page. Hope you don't mind me replying. You can get a custom signature by inserting code in the ''Signature'' textbox in your preferences (top-right corner).  +++$+++ Hi there. Saw your post in Riana's talk page. Hope you don't mind me replying. You can get a custom signature by inserting code in the ''Signature'' textbox in your preferences (top-right corner). [[User:Ajcfreak|<font color="#0000FF">a</font><font color="#FF0000"><b>JC</b></font><font color="#0000FF">freak</font>]] [[User_talk:Ajcfreak|<font color="#CC66FF"><b>y</b></font><font color="#66CC00">A</font><font color="#FF6600"><b>k</b></font>]] 23:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
541884 +++$+++ Ajcfreak +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541883 +++$+++ 541883 +++$+++ 2007-07-04 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.183618380E09 +++$+++ You could use the <nowiki><FONT><\/nowiki> with the ''COLOR'' attribute to set the colours of text. Is this helpful or did I confuse you?  +++$+++ :You could use the <nowiki><FONT></nowiki> with the ''COLOR'' attribute to set the colours of text. Is this helpful or did I confuse you? [[User:Ajcfreak|<font color="#0000FF">a</font><font color="#FF0000"><b>JC</b></font><font color="#0000FF">freak</font>]] [[User_talk:Ajcfreak|<font color="#CC66FF"><b>y</b></font><font color="#66CC00">A</font><font color="#FF6600"><b>k</b></font>]] 23:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
541885 +++$+++ Ajcfreak +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541883 +++$+++ 541884 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.183676100E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the late reply. I logged in just now. :) And yes, it's ''color''; not colo''u''r. As far as I've seen, programming languages and codes tend to stick to the American spelling. I hope this helps. Do get back to me if you've any further queries. Happy Wiki-signing!  +++$+++ ::Sorry for the late reply. I logged in just now. :) And yes, it's ''color''; not colo''u''r. As far as I've seen, programming languages and codes tend to stick to the American spelling. I hope this helps. Do get back to me if you've any further queries. Happy Wiki-signing! [[User:Ajcfreak|<font color="#0000FF">a</font><font color="#FF0000"><b>JC</b></font><font color="#0000FF">freak</font>]] [[User_talk:Ajcfreak|<font color="#CC66FF"><b>y</b></font><font color="#66CC00">A</font><font color="#FF6600"><b>k</b></font>]] 15:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
541886 +++$+++ Riana +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541883 +++$+++ 541885 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.183702500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for replying, Dan, I somehow missed Dreamy's message on my page! Hope that helps, mate :) ~  +++$+++ :::Thanks for replying, Dan, I somehow missed Dreamy's message on my page! Hope that helps, mate :) ~ [[User talk:Riana|Riana <font color="green">⁂</font>]] 23:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

282647 +++$+++ Sandstein +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-19 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.253378700E09 +++$+++ Could you check whether the image is indeed mirror-reversed? Thanks, <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ Could you check whether the image is indeed mirror-reversed? Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 09:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
282648 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282647 +++$+++ 282647 +++$+++ 2009-09-19 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.253385900E09 +++$+++ I think it is a bit much to suggest it is an insult to show him with his hand up to his left ear (it certainly was not deliberate on my part and I doubt, from what I have read of Milarepa, that he would have been offended) and, aside from returning to Gyantse to check, I don't really know what to do. If I can contact a friend of mine who is a very well-known Tibetan painter, I will ask him his opinion about the iconographic implications (if any). Hope this is of some help. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :I think it is a bit much to suggest it is an insult to show him with his hand up to his left ear (it certainly was not deliberate on my part and I doubt, from what I have read of Milarepa, that he would have been offended) and, aside from returning to Gyantse to check, I don't really know what to do. If I can contact a friend of mine who is a very well-known Tibetan painter, I will ask him his opinion about the iconographic implications (if any). Hope this is of some help. Sincerely, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 11:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
282649 +++$+++ Sandstein +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282647 +++$+++ 282648 +++$+++ 2009-09-19 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.253393100E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for checking! I guess that's it, then; I'll direct the submitter of that ticket to your response if he follows up. Best, <small><span style=\"border:1px solid black;padding:1px;\"> +++$+++ ::Thank you very much for checking! I guess that's it, then; I'll direct the submitter of that ticket to your response if he follows up. Best, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 13:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

20504 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20504 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-09 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.178695200E09 +++$+++ Vandalizing french articles about HP certainly isn't going to help you in your quest. +++$+++ Vandalizing french articles about HP certainly isn't going to help you in your quest.[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 00:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
20505 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20504 +++$+++ 20504 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.178696400E09 +++$+++ Exactly the same reasons apply on the french wiki as here, with regard to precisely why reporting the widespread debate about the plot of Harry Potter books is absolutely appropriate. Wiki is supposed to report what others think about a subject. My french is good enough to read the articles and see whether valid content has been deleted, but I will not attempt to debate the issue with you in French. It seems to me that your time might be better spent expanding the french articles to include content which is on the english wiki, not deleting what little is there already. You have still not explained why you consider my references unfairly represent views about the meaning of 'hallows', though you persist in deleting the references.  +++$+++ :Exactly the same reasons apply on the french wiki as here, with regard to precisely why reporting the widespread debate about the plot of Harry Potter books is absolutely appropriate. Wiki is supposed to report what others think about a subject. My french is good enough to read the articles and see whether valid content has been deleted, but I will not attempt to debate the issue with you in French. It seems to me that your time might be better spent expanding the french articles to include content which is on the english wiki, not deleting what little is there already. You have still not explained why you consider my references unfairly represent views about the meaning of 'hallows', though you persist in deleting the references. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 00:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
20506 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20504 +++$+++ 20505 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.178696880E09 +++$+++ \"So you say a discussion about why you can't include your POV refs, isn't \"immediately relevant\" to why you can't include your POV refs ? It seems you have not read well, or even that you don't want to read. So here is the link, again: [[Talk:Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows#The_meaning_of_.22Deathly_Hallows.22]]. +++$+++ ::"So you say a discussion about why you can't include your POV refs, isn't "immediately relevant" to why you can't include your POV refs ? It seems you have not read well, or even that you don't want to read. So here is the link, again: [[Talk:Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows#The_meaning_of_.22Deathly_Hallows.22]].[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 00:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
20507 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20504 +++$+++ 20506 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.178697420E09 +++$+++ The only relevant comment I can see in that large chunk is that you dispute Rowling's opinion of what constitutes a good source of discussion about her books, and claim that my refs are POV. Yet you produce no evidence to support this. I am not asking you for a different place where you say the same thing, but some actual evidence in the form of other references which indicate that mine are POV.  +++$+++ :::The only relevant comment I can see in that large chunk is that you dispute Rowling's opinion of what constitutes a good source of discussion about her books, and claim that my refs are POV. Yet you produce no evidence to support this. I am not asking you for a different place where you say the same thing, but some actual evidence in the form of other references which indicate that mine are POV. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 00:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
20508 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20504 +++$+++ 20507 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.178697900E09 +++$+++ # What evidence indicating your edits would be NPOV did ''you'' produce ?  +++$+++ ::::# What evidence indicating your edits would be NPOV did ''you'' produce ? [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 01:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

544793 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544793 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-18 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.198035360E09 +++$+++ Help.  I reverted some POV edits, then I noticed that the article was messed up (prior to me I think).  References, templates, lots of stuff is missing.  HELP.   +++$+++ Help.  I reverted some POV edits, then I noticed that the article was messed up (prior to me I think).  References, templates, lots of stuff is missing.  HELP.  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 19:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
544794 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544793 +++$+++ 544793 +++$+++ 2007-12-18 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.198035840E09 +++$+++ Never mind.  Someone figured it out.  I'm just trying to figure out why Twinkle removed stuff.   +++$+++ :Never mind.  Someone figured it out.  I'm just trying to figure out why Twinkle removed stuff.  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 19:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

544796 +++$+++ Itub +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544796 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-21 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.198259820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for creating that image, it looks great! I don't know if you have noticed, but apparently you forgot to include the copyright info and the image is currently under threat of deletion. Just to let you know. -- +++$+++ Thanks for creating that image, it looks great! I don't know if you have noticed, but apparently you forgot to include the copyright info and the image is currently under threat of deletion. Just to let you know. --[[User:Itub|Itub]] ([[User talk:Itub|talk]]) 09:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
544797 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544796 +++$+++ 544796 +++$+++ 2007-12-21 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.198260300E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Added tag.  +++$+++ :Thanks! Added tag. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 10:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
544798 +++$+++ Cronholm144 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544796 +++$+++ 544797 +++$+++ 2007-12-21 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.198263720E09 +++$+++ When I saw this thread I created [[:Image:NADNADH.svg|this svg]]. I can change fonts or colors if you like. I won't put it in the article unless you feel it is improvement (I am not sure it is at 250px) Cheers and good luck with the [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide|FAC]]. \u2014 +++$+++ ::When I saw this thread I created [[:Image:NADNADH.svg|this svg]]. I can change fonts or colors if you like. I won't put it in the article unless you feel it is improvement (I am not sure it is at 250px) Cheers and good luck with the [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide|FAC]]. —[[User:Cronholm144|Cronholm]]<sup>[[User talk:Cronholm144|144]]</sup> 11:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

20509 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20509 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-09 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.178698860E09 +++$+++ er, see her website where she reccomends other websites.Rowling is an absolute authority on the content of her own books, and no one is better placed to say whether a particular source is authoritative, or not. This has nothing to do with wiki rules.I have not seen any quotes from her commenting on any wiki. No, there were no refs at all in the section you quote which throw any light on the issue of whether my refs are NPOV. I have not seen you produce any, anywhere, and I very much doubt any exist. I don't have to prove they are NPOV, you have to prove they aren't.  +++$+++ er, see her website where she reccomends other websites.Rowling is an absolute authority on the content of her own books, and no one is better placed to say whether a particular source is authoritative, or not. This has nothing to do with wiki rules.I have not seen any quotes from her commenting on any wiki. No, there were no refs at all in the section you quote which throw any light on the issue of whether my refs are NPOV. I have not seen you produce any, anywhere, and I very much doubt any exist. I don't have to prove they are NPOV, you have to prove they aren't. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 01:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
20510 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20509 +++$+++ 20509 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.178699220E09 +++$+++ #I have proved your edits are POV, you have to prove they aren't (but because you know they are POV and because you can't prove the contrary, you claim you don't have to. That's hilarious). +++$+++ :#I have proved your edits are POV, you have to prove they aren't (but because you know they are POV and because you can't prove the contrary, you claim you don't have to. That's hilarious).[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 01:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

20511 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20511 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-09 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.178700300E09 +++$+++ No, one editor writes something and references it. If someone else wishes to claim the first edit unfairly represents the subject then they have to prove it. You are claiming it is an unfair representation, so you must demonstrate that this is so.  +++$+++ No, one editor writes something and references it. If someone else wishes to claim the first edit unfairly represents the subject then they have to prove it. You are claiming it is an unfair representation, so you must demonstrate that this is so. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 01:45, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
20512 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20511 +++$+++ 20511 +++$+++ 2007-05-09 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.178737020E09 +++$+++ You must demonstrate it would not be so.  +++$+++ :You must demonstrate it would not be so. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 11:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

282656 +++$+++ Mikenorton +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-26 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.253981280E09 +++$+++ I was interested by the earthquake that you added to the [[Historical earthquakes]] page. I can't seem to get hold of the original Times report. I know its title, 'City that sank sheds light on a lost empire' and I even found a link to the timesonline page, but unfortunately that no longer works. There is also apparently a report in the Shenzhen Daily from earlier that year, but the online availability of that paper starts in October 2001 and links on other sites to earlier issues no longer work. I was wondering if you had access to the original times report and can confirm that it matches the section in this source [http:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/silkroad\/texts\/weilue\/notes11_30.html] (Section 13.6). If it does, that gives me a reason to add the link to the page. Thanks,  +++$+++ I was interested by the earthquake that you added to the [[Historical earthquakes]] page. I can't seem to get hold of the original Times report. I know its title, 'City that sank sheds light on a lost empire' and I even found a link to the timesonline page, but unfortunately that no longer works. There is also apparently a report in the Shenzhen Daily from earlier that year, but the online availability of that paper starts in October 2001 and links on other sites to earlier issues no longer work. I was wondering if you had access to the original times report and can confirm that it matches the section in this source [http://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/texts/weilue/notes11_30.html] (Section 13.6). If it does, that gives me a reason to add the link to the page. Thanks, [[User:Mikenorton|Mikenorton]] ([[User talk:Mikenorton|talk]]) 09:08, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
282657 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282656 +++$+++ 282656 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.253986800E09 +++$+++ Hi Mike! Yes, those are direct quotes from the articles which I included in my draft annotated translation of the ''Weil\xfce'' at [http:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/silkroad\/texts\/weilue\/notes11_30.html]. Unfortunately, it seems that both links I gave there have gone dead in the meantime - thanks for pointing this out. Would you mind making the link? It would be nice if someone else did it. Many thanks,  +++$+++ :Hi Mike! Yes, those are direct quotes from the articles which I included in my draft annotated translation of the ''Weilüe'' at [http://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/texts/weilue/notes11_30.html]. Unfortunately, it seems that both links I gave there have gone dead in the meantime - thanks for pointing this out. Would you mind making the link? It would be nice if someone else did it. Many thanks, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 10:40, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
282658 +++$+++ Mikenorton +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282656 +++$+++ 282657 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.253987940E09 +++$+++ Wow, I had no idea that you were responsible for the annotated translation. I'm very happy to add a link to it. Maybe an academic publication will appear on this one day, must have been one hell of an earthquake. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Wow, I had no idea that you were responsible for the annotated translation. I'm very happy to add a link to it. Maybe an academic publication will appear on this one day, must have been one hell of an earthquake. Cheers, [[User:Mikenorton|Mikenorton]] ([[User talk:Mikenorton|talk]]) 10:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
282659 +++$+++ Mikenorton +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282656 +++$+++ 282656 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.254073560E09 +++$+++ No problem, I like digging out stuff on old earthquakes. I'll keep my eyes open as well, Cheers,  +++$+++ :No problem, I like digging out stuff on old earthquakes. I'll keep my eyes open as well, Cheers, [[User:Mikenorton|Mikenorton]] ([[User talk:Mikenorton|talk]]) 10:46, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

454593 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ Joke137 +++$+++ 454593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-28 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.159436940E09 +++$+++ I can expand on that more, but I am really tired and I am trying to work on some actually important things in the meantime. This whole discussion consumes almost the entire time I have for WP.  +++$+++ I can expand on that more, but I am really tired and I am trying to work on some actually important things in the meantime. This whole discussion consumes almost the entire time I have for WP. [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 02:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
454594 +++$+++ Bravada +++$+++ Joke137 +++$+++ 454593 +++$+++ 454593 +++$+++ 2006-09-28 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.159484760E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I hope we are getting closer to common understanding, or to the understanding that this was a misunderstaning, and we can continue working on both article development and the GA process proceedings further :D  +++$+++ :Anyway, I hope we are getting closer to common understanding, or to the understanding that this was a misunderstaning, and we can continue working on both article development and the GA process proceedings further :D [[User:Bravada|Bravada]], [[User talk:Bravada|talk]] - 16:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

20515 +++$+++ Libatius +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20515 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-28 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.180420980E09 +++$+++ It's hardly my business, but I just came across your arbitration case on the French Wikipedia with Folken - he just removed *that* paragraph again from one of the articles it appears in (R.A.B. or Regulus Black...).  I was following the whole debate but then it seems to stop about 10 days ago - is there more somewhere or has it just fizzled out?  Would be interested to hear the outcome.  +++$+++ It's hardly my business, but I just came across your arbitration case on the French Wikipedia with Folken - he just removed *that* paragraph again from one of the articles it appears in (R.A.B. or Regulus Black...).  I was following the whole debate but then it seems to stop about 10 days ago - is there more somewhere or has it just fizzled out?  Would be interested to hear the outcome. [[User:Libatius|Libatius]] 23:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
20516 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20515 +++$+++ 20515 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.180569720E09 +++$+++ Hi. I had a look myself at the debate on the french wiki. On the whole the articles are static as I would wish them, (and others, particularly ones competent to write french). The pompier posted a reply on Folken's page, once again inviting him to produce any further arguments he could think of to support his case, specifically about whether Granger is a good source, really. Other sources were discussed but the arbitrator found that Granger was a satisfactory source, so the case for inclusion was made without considering the merits of others. Folken seems to be persistenly removing the communications on his page there, as he does here if he does not like them. So check the back history to find the debate.  +++$+++ :Hi. I had a look myself at the debate on the french wiki. On the whole the articles are static as I would wish them, (and others, particularly ones competent to write french). The pompier posted a reply on Folken's page, once again inviting him to produce any further arguments he could think of to support his case, specifically about whether Granger is a good source, really. Other sources were discussed but the arbitrator found that Granger was a satisfactory source, so the case for inclusion was made without considering the merits of others. Folken seems to be persistenly removing the communications on his page there, as he does here if he does not like them. So check the back history to find the debate. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 17:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
20517 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20515 +++$+++ 20516 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.180570620E09 +++$+++ Sandpiper, it's seems you have a personal disliking for me. But honestly, what do you care ? Is your life so empty that you actually enjoy monitoring everything I do on each wiki, so that you can comment it and criticize it everywhere, even on the talkpages of other users who don't give a damn about your little vendetta ? What does it matter if I do what I want with my talk page, what does it matter to you ? Don't you have anything else in your life ? Is really your most important activity in life checking how I manage my talk page on international wikis ? +++$+++ ::Sandpiper, it's seems you have a personal disliking for me. But honestly, what do you care ? Is your life so empty that you actually enjoy monitoring everything I do on each wiki, so that you can comment it and criticize it everywhere, even on the talkpages of other users who don't give a damn about your little vendetta ? What does it matter if I do what I want with my talk page, what does it matter to you ? Don't you have anything else in your life ? Is really your most important activity in life checking how I manage my talk page on international wikis ?[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 17:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
20518 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20515 +++$+++ 20517 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.180812060E09 +++$+++ As far as I can see, the pompier found against you and it was accepted that Granger is a very good source. He offered you the chance to bring forward further arguments, which you have not, and there the matter rests. You then set about accusing him of bias on his RfA. Unfortunate for him, we all await the outcome. He has 88 for and 5 against, including 3 feeling he should wait a bit longer, one which seems to be some sort of a joke, and Folken's objection.  +++$+++ :::As far as I can see, the pompier found against you and it was accepted that Granger is a very good source. He offered you the chance to bring forward further arguments, which you have not, and there the matter rests. You then set about accusing him of bias on his RfA. Unfortunate for him, we all await the outcome. He has 88 for and 5 against, including 3 feeling he should wait a bit longer, one which seems to be some sort of a joke, and Folken's objection. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 12:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

282660 +++$+++ Shenme +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-27 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.254055080E09 +++$+++ You're busy on [[Donghu]] and I don't want to get in the way.  In one of your edits could you fix the broken [[Yuezhi] link?  (That's the way it appears now - missing the second ']')  +++$+++ You're busy on [[Donghu]] and I don't want to get in the way.  In one of your edits could you fix the broken [[Yuezhi] link?  (That's the way it appears now - missing the second ']') [[User:Shenme|Shenme]] ([[User talk:Shenme|talk]]) 05:38, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
282661 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282660 +++$+++ 282660 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.254057180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pointing this out - I may well have missed it. I removed all the brackets around that occurrence of Yuezhi as the name appears above properly linked. Thanks and cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks for pointing this out - I may well have missed it. I removed all the brackets around that occurrence of Yuezhi as the name appears above properly linked. Thanks and cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 06:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

544805 +++$+++ Awadewit +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544805 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-30 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.199075880E09 +++$+++ I'm hoping that you will be able to help out at [[Introduction to evolution]]. I know that you worked with [[User:WillowW|Willow]] and others on [[Evolution]]. I believe that these introductory pages are extremely important for Wikipedia as the main pages can sometimes be dense for the lay reader ([[Introduction to general relativity]] was a lifesaver for me!). I've been working with the editors at IE over the past few months in an on-again, off-again way in a sort of review capacity, but I mostly provide a prose and organization check. I was wondering if you would be willing to provide an outside scientific accuracy check.  +++$+++ I'm hoping that you will be able to help out at [[Introduction to evolution]]. I know that you worked with [[User:WillowW|Willow]] and others on [[Evolution]]. I believe that these introductory pages are extremely important for Wikipedia as the main pages can sometimes be dense for the lay reader ([[Introduction to general relativity]] was a lifesaver for me!). I've been working with the editors at IE over the past few months in an on-again, off-again way in a sort of review capacity, but I mostly provide a prose and organization check. I was wondering if you would be willing to provide an outside scientific accuracy check. [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] | [[User talk:Awadewit|<small>talk</small>]] 20:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
544806 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544805 +++$+++ 544805 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.199419080E09 +++$+++ Yes, please do, [[User:TimVickers|Tim]]!  I just gave it a cursory review, but I doubt my expertise and wonder whether I was too demanding for an introductory article aimed at high-school students.  It's clear that the authors have lavished a lot of care and thought to the article, and made clear strategic choices on the writing and referencing.  I think you would bring a better, more balanced and broader perspective than I can.  Happy New Year, and hoping your travels went well,  +++$+++ :Yes, please do, [[User:TimVickers|Tim]]!  I just gave it a cursory review, but I doubt my expertise and wonder whether I was too demanding for an introductory article aimed at high-school students.  It's clear that the authors have lavished a lot of care and thought to the article, and made clear strategic choices on the writing and referencing.  I think you would bring a better, more balanced and broader perspective than I can.  Happy New Year, and hoping your travels went well, [[User:WillowW|Willow]] ([[User talk:WillowW|talk]]) 19:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

20520 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20520 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-02 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.180805880E09 +++$+++ Now, don't include any controversial content in articles without discussing it first and reaching a consensus with other users. If you continue to ignore others, you'll have to face the consequences of your acts. If you refuse to show any good faith by keeping acting as a pov pusher and ignoring comments from others, there's no doubt about what will happen, so the choice is yours... +++$+++ Now, don't include any controversial content in articles without discussing it first and reaching a consensus with other users. If you continue to ignore others, you'll have to face the consequences of your acts. If you refuse to show any good faith by keeping acting as a pov pusher and ignoring comments from others, there's no doubt about what will happen, so the choice is yours...[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 10:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
20521 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20520 +++$+++ 20520 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 12:03:00 +++$+++ 1.180810980E09 +++$+++ Please stop attempting to bend every rule you can find to support your own point of view.  +++$+++ :Please stop attempting to bend every rule you can find to support your own point of view. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 12:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

20524 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20524 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-04 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.180979160E09 +++$+++ Refusing discussion is admitting you're wrong, and that you're merely a disrupter of WP trying to push your POV. +++$+++ Refusing discussion is admitting you're wrong, and that you're merely a disrupter of WP trying to push your POV.[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 10:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
20525 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20524 +++$+++ 20524 +++$+++ 2007-06-04 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.181003400E09 +++$+++ We have already exchanged maybe 10,000 lines of argument. I suggest  you read it again, more carefully, if you still do not understand my points.  +++$+++ :We have already exchanged maybe 10,000 lines of argument. I suggest  you read it again, more carefully, if you still do not understand my points. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 17:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

20526 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-11 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.181589180E09 +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows|, as you did to [[:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Inventing imaginary consensuses is not acceptable on Wikipedia. If you keep pushing your POV, you'll be blocked.|Inventing imaginary consensuses is not acceptable on Wikipedia. If you keep pushing your POV, you'll be blocked.|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows|, as you did to [[:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Inventing imaginary consensuses is not acceptable on Wikipedia. If you keep pushing your POV, you'll be blocked.|Inventing imaginary consensuses is not acceptable on Wikipedia. If you keep pushing your POV, you'll be blocked.|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npov2 -->[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 12:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
20527 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20526 +++$+++ 20526 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.181589300E09 +++$+++ Folken, stop playing stupid gtames and posting inappropriate tags on peoples pages. Did you know that can be construed as vandalism?  +++$+++ :Folken, stop playing stupid gtames and posting inappropriate tags on peoples pages. Did you know that can be construed as vandalism? [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 12:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
20528 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20526 +++$+++ 20527 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.181589600E09 +++$+++ You were warned earlier that you couldn't impose your POV if you kept ignoring other people's opinion, if you kept refusing to discuss your edits, and if you kept refusing to reach consensus with others. You've blatantly ignored all I have told you and still tried to impose your POV while you refused to reach consensus with others, so now you're only getting what you deserve. You're actually being disruptive, and you're on the right way to get blocked. You're even making things worse by using personal attacks \"stupid games\", are you actually trying to get permanently blocked ? +++$+++ ::You were warned earlier that you couldn't impose your POV if you kept ignoring other people's opinion, if you kept refusing to discuss your edits, and if you kept refusing to reach consensus with others. You've blatantly ignored all I have told you and still tried to impose your POV while you refused to reach consensus with others, so now you're only getting what you deserve. You're actually being disruptive, and you're on the right way to get blocked. You're even making things worse by using personal attacks "stupid games", are you actually trying to get permanently blocked ?[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 12:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

527709 +++$+++ Natebailey +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527709 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-27 06:21:00 +++$+++ 1.180272060E09 +++$+++ Probably not your fault, really, but the template change of user contrib meant that I could no longer find this page [http:\/\/tools.wikimedia.de\/~interiot\/cgi-bin\/Tool1\/wannabe_kate] which I enjoy using as an overview of my work. It would've been nice for those of us using that template to have this link remain on our own userpages when the template was changed...  +++$+++ Probably not your fault, really, but the template change of user contrib meant that I could no longer find this page [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate] which I enjoy using as an overview of my work. It would've been nice for those of us using that template to have this link remain on our own userpages when the template was changed... [[User:Natebailey|Natebailey]] 06:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
527710 +++$+++ Natebailey +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527709 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.180331700E09 +++$+++ Oops! I didn't see the link because it isn't highlighted until you hover over it. I tried clicking on the number or the earlier text and there was no link! Perhaps the template could include a dotted line or similarly subtle emphasis that there is a link there? Thanks for responding! :-)  +++$+++ ::Oops! I didn't see the link because it isn't highlighted until you hover over it. I tried clicking on the number or the earlier text and there was no link! Perhaps the template could include a dotted line or similarly subtle emphasis that there is a link there? Thanks for responding! :-) [[User:Natebailey|Natebailey]] 22:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

544816 +++$+++ Witty lama +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544816 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-13 07:38:00 +++$+++ 1.200238680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:witty lama|Witty]] [[User talk:witty lama|Lama]] 07:38, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
544817 +++$+++ Witty lama +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544816 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-16 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.200514620E09 +++$+++ Sunday morning (my time) is good. I'm not entirely sure what the time difference between wherever you are and Sydney is - and i'm too tired now to do the backwards-counting - but I would have a preference for midday Sunday. That would put it at 7-8pm Saturday going on your calculations? Is that ok? Please add me on Skype to get this show on the road :-)  +++$+++ ::Sunday morning (my time) is good. I'm not entirely sure what the time difference between wherever you are and Sydney is - and i'm too tired now to do the backwards-counting - but I would have a preference for midday Sunday. That would put it at 7-8pm Saturday going on your calculations? Is that ok? Please add me on Skype to get this show on the road :-) [[User:witty lama|Witty]] [[User talk:witty lama|Lama]] 12:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
544818 +++$+++ Witty lama +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544816 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-18 03:07:00 +++$+++ 1.200654420E09 +++$+++ I can't see any Skype invite from you... I searched for \"tim  vickers\" in Skype and found about 6 people with that name. What's your Skypename?  +++$+++ :::I can't see any Skype invite from you... I searched for "tim  vickers" in Skype and found about 6 people with that name. What's your Skypename? [[User:witty lama|Witty]] [[User talk:witty lama|Lama]] 03:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
544819 +++$+++ Witty lama +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544816 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-19 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.200769740E09 +++$+++ I've now added you with a request too. Hopefully you see that... I'll see you in about 14 hours.  +++$+++ ::::I've now added you with a request too. Hopefully you see that... I'll see you in about 14 hours. [[User:witty lama|Witty]] [[User talk:witty lama|Lama]] 11:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

20529 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20529 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-11 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.181589300E09 +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] }}}Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Horcruxe|, as you did to [[:Horcruxe]]}}, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] }}}Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Horcruxe|, as you did to [[:Horcruxe]]}}, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npov3 -->[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 12:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
20530 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20529 +++$+++ 20529 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.181590260E09 +++$+++ again, see my comment above. stop  abusing proper process by plastering wiki with inappropriate messages. This can be construed as vandalism, especially when a user is experienced enough to know better.  +++$+++ :again, see my comment above. stop  abusing proper process by plastering wiki with inappropriate messages. This can be construed as vandalism, especially when a user is experienced enough to know better. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 12:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
20531 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20529 +++$+++ 20530 +++$+++ 2007-06-12 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.181669040E09 +++$+++ An experienced user knows better than to constantly ignore other people, constantly ignore discussions, constantly refuse to take them into acccount, constantly refuse to reach consensus, and constantly try to impose a POV by force. Thus you're not an experienced user. Thus templates are perfectly appropriate, and they correspond to the situation. +++$+++ ::An experienced user knows better than to constantly ignore other people, constantly ignore discussions, constantly refuse to take them into acccount, constantly refuse to reach consensus, and constantly try to impose a POV by force. Thus you're not an experienced user. Thus templates are perfectly appropriate, and they correspond to the situation.[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 10:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

20532 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20532 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-11 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.181620560E09 +++$+++ After all this, I see you've reverted AGAIN on RAB, thus ignoring both my previous warnings, and the official warnings you got today. This is obviously a provocation, and you've undisputably proved that you're here only to disturb WP to prove a point. I let you one chance, stop all this disruptive reverts and maybe you'll escape your fate. This is a test between us: prove that you ''can'' work with others, that you can make good faith contributions, by not reverting '''anything''' until book 7 is out. Prove that you're not merely a POV pusher and discuss your edits, and try to actually reach consensus with others. If, after proper debates, you've proven the value of your edits and that you have convinced others that you're right, then, other users will re-add the debated content. To prove my good faith, I remove all templates I gave you today. '''This is a pact between us'''. No more templates, no more warnings, no admin intervention if you can behave, if you can show me you're a good editor that accepts to discuss his edits, instead of imposing them by force. I trust you on this one, now the choice is yours, you calm down and you do as all good WP editors are supposed to do (and you ''may'' have a chance to see your edits accepted). I've given you many chances, months ago and only days ago, each time you've rejected them. Please realize this is the very last you'll get, so don't waste it this time.   +++$+++ After all this, I see you've reverted AGAIN on RAB, thus ignoring both my previous warnings, and the official warnings you got today. This is obviously a provocation, and you've undisputably proved that you're here only to disturb WP to prove a point. I let you one chance, stop all this disruptive reverts and maybe you'll escape your fate. This is a test between us: prove that you ''can'' work with others, that you can make good faith contributions, by not reverting '''anything''' until book 7 is out. Prove that you're not merely a POV pusher and discuss your edits, and try to actually reach consensus with others. If, after proper debates, you've proven the value of your edits and that you have convinced others that you're right, then, other users will re-add the debated content. To prove my good faith, I remove all templates I gave you today. '''This is a pact between us'''. No more templates, no more warnings, no admin intervention if you can behave, if you can show me you're a good editor that accepts to discuss his edits, instead of imposing them by force. I trust you on this one, now the choice is yours, you calm down and you do as all good WP editors are supposed to do (and you ''may'' have a chance to see your edits accepted). I've given you many chances, months ago and only days ago, each time you've rejected them. Please realize this is the very last you'll get, so don't waste it this time.  [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 20:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
20533 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20532 +++$+++ 20532 +++$+++ 2007-06-12 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.181661480E09 +++$+++ Folken, what  are you talking about? The only warnings I get are ones posted by you, and official is not the word I would use to describe them.  I notice that you have chosen to remove the warning flags you posted on my page. Please do not post any more. You know perfectly well that all my edits are in good faith. The difference between us seems to be that I consider it appropriate, indeed correct, to report the fan interest and debate over Hp, and you do not. Frankly, I do not understand why you consider it inappropriate to report what the readership thinks about the books. The whole reason for the success of ther books is the extent to which readers have become involved in the story.  +++$+++ :Folken, what  are you talking about? The only warnings I get are ones posted by you, and official is not the word I would use to describe them.  I notice that you have chosen to remove the warning flags you posted on my page. Please do not post any more. You know perfectly well that all my edits are in good faith. The difference between us seems to be that I consider it appropriate, indeed correct, to report the fan interest and debate over Hp, and you do not. Frankly, I do not understand why you consider it inappropriate to report what the readership thinks about the books. The whole reason for the success of ther books is the extent to which readers have become involved in the story. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 08:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
20534 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20532 +++$+++ 20533 +++$+++ 2007-06-12 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.181669040E09 +++$+++ That was your last chance. +++$+++ ::That was your last chance.[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 10:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

544822 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-16 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.200541380E09 +++$+++ Have you been following the homeopathy article recently? I was wondering because I think it's time to start getting it to FA status and ending the disputes.  +++$+++ Have you been following the homeopathy article recently? I was wondering because I think it's time to start getting it to FA status and ending the disputes. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 19:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
544823 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544822 +++$+++ 544822 +++$+++ 2008-01-16 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.200541500E09 +++$+++ WDM, the Homeopathy article is starting to stabilize.  But just a thought, will an FAC cause it blow up again?   +++$+++ :WDM, the Homeopathy article is starting to stabilize.  But just a thought, will an FAC cause it blow up again?  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 19:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
544824 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544822 +++$+++ 544823 +++$+++ 2008-01-16 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.200541860E09 +++$+++ It's only natural that it will stabilize after a long time being protected. Editors generally get bored with it when they can't make edits. It should be unprotected and if after a few weeks there are no edit wars, then we can say it's stable. I think that if it's unprotected, within a few hours it will be edit warred over.  +++$+++ ::It's only natural that it will stabilize after a long time being protected. Editors generally get bored with it when they can't make edits. It should be unprotected and if after a few weeks there are no edit wars, then we can say it's stable. I think that if it's unprotected, within a few hours it will be edit warred over. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 19:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
544825 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544822 +++$+++ 544822 +++$+++ 2008-01-16 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.200542640E09 +++$+++ You can't up a protected article up for FA, if you want to experiment request unprotection and see what happens.  +++$+++ :You can't up a protected article up for FA, if you want to experiment request unprotection and see what happens. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 20:04, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
544826 +++$+++ Wikidudeman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544822 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-17 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.200561240E09 +++$+++ What I mean is that we should work on resolving disputes and then go from there, before we nominate FA. The article itself needs to be unprotected for at least a few weeks and without edit warring before it's really stable anyway.  +++$+++ ::::What I mean is that we should work on resolving disputes and then go from there, before we nominate FA. The article itself needs to be unprotected for at least a few weeks and without edit warring before it's really stable anyway. [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 01:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
544827 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544822 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-17 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.200561540E09 +++$+++ I would be concerned that FAC will cause a holy war there.   +++$+++ :::::I would be concerned that FAC will cause a holy war there.  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 01:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
544828 +++$+++ Filll +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544822 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-17 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.200563340E09 +++$+++ I am as well. I didn't know it was protected. I have proposed several times that we let the pro-homeopathy editors create their own version of a NPOV article and then compare them after they have had a few months to work on it, and then if it is not really NPOV, try to help them understand why. -- +++$+++ ::::::I am as well. I didn't know it was protected. I have proposed several times that we let the pro-homeopathy editors create their own version of a NPOV article and then compare them after they have had a few months to work on it, and then if it is not really NPOV, try to help them understand why. --[[User:Filll|Filll]] ([[User talk:Filll|talk]]) 01:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

20535 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20535 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-12 10:24:00 +++$+++ 1.181669040E09 +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] }}}This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}, you ''will'' be blocked from editing Wikipedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> +++$+++ {{{icon|[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] }}}This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}, you ''will'' be blocked from editing Wikipedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npov4 -->[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 10:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
20536 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20535 +++$+++ 20535 +++$+++ 2007-06-12 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.181707440E09 +++$+++ I see you placed all the silly tags back into the discussion. I remind you Folken, that wiki works by consensus. It is your approach which has led to disciplinary action.  +++$+++ :I see you placed all the silly tags back into the discussion. I remind you Folken, that wiki works by consensus. It is your approach which has led to disciplinary action. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 21:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
20537 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20535 +++$+++ 20536 +++$+++ 2007-06-13 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.181742960E09 +++$+++ As per your edit comment reply, this issue will be over when you accept that comment written by third parties discussing the plots of the Rowling books is not only admissable content on wiki, but is the sort of stuff we should be repoorting. And since you are in the habit of deleting my replies i say once again, if you feel my inclusions are not NPOV, then please produce your own references to show that I am unfairly misrepresenting the debate.   +++$+++ ::As per your edit comment reply, this issue will be over when you accept that comment written by third parties discussing the plots of the Rowling books is not only admissable content on wiki, but is the sort of stuff we should be repoorting. And since you are in the habit of deleting my replies i say once again, if you feel my inclusions are not NPOV, then please produce your own references to show that I am unfairly misrepresenting the debate.  [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 06:56, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

20538 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20538 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-15 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.181976120E09 +++$+++ You won't lead us into a \"right or wrong\" debate, it has not it's place on WP and it's not WP's focus. Theories and speculations are just not the focus of WP, moreover when users are here to prove they are right (or so they think). You can however go to the HP wiki [http:\/\/harrypotterwiki.org], which is a fan project, in which theories are acceptable, and are indeed the focus. But you'll never impose content that isn't the focus of WP, and you cannot keep revert warring while refusing to discuss with others, refusing to reach consensus, which is the basis of WP. Don't you realize that you are the instrument of your own defeat, by your behavior ?  +++$+++ You won't lead us into a "right or wrong" debate, it has not it's place on WP and it's not WP's focus. Theories and speculations are just not the focus of WP, moreover when users are here to prove they are right (or so they think). You can however go to the HP wiki [http://harrypotterwiki.org], which is a fan project, in which theories are acceptable, and are indeed the focus. But you'll never impose content that isn't the focus of WP, and you cannot keep revert warring while refusing to discuss with others, refusing to reach consensus, which is the basis of WP. Don't you realize that you are the instrument of your own defeat, by your behavior ? [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 23:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
20539 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20538 +++$+++ 20538 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.181979240E09 +++$+++ I will try to make the issue of NPOV more clear. There exists debate as to the likely content of DH. I have reported it. It is entirely proper for me to report what others have said. You can only argue for the deletion of this material on grounds that my reporting is biased, if you can show that I have unfairly reported the sources, or can produce other sources which disagree with them. You havn't. You can attempt to argue that the sources are unreliable or non-noteable (as you have attempted), but you cannot argue that I unfairly report them unless you can show that it is the case.   +++$+++ :I will try to make the issue of NPOV more clear. There exists debate as to the likely content of DH. I have reported it. It is entirely proper for me to report what others have said. You can only argue for the deletion of this material on grounds that my reporting is biased, if you can show that I have unfairly reported the sources, or can produce other sources which disagree with them. You havn't. You can attempt to argue that the sources are unreliable or non-noteable (as you have attempted), but you cannot argue that I unfairly report them unless you can show that it is the case.  [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 00:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
20540 +++$+++ Folken de Fanel +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20538 +++$+++ 20539 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.181981520E09 +++$+++ And you still avoid answering about your disruptive behavior, imposing content by force instead of discussing and trying to reach consensus.  +++$+++ ::And you still avoid answering about your disruptive behavior, imposing content by force instead of discussing and trying to reach consensus. [[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] 01:12, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

544829 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544829 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-16 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.200550080E09 +++$+++ Also, I wasn't sure whether you wanted a reflected-light or transmitted-light scope, and whether a normal or inverted set-up.  Any clues to your wishes for the article, whether ravenous (\"I want ALL of them!\"), sympathetic (\"Choose the one ''you'' find prettiest\") or practical (\"A normal transmitted-light microscope would help the reader most\"), would be most welcome. :) Cheery cheerio, off to dinner and knitting,  +++$+++ Also, I wasn't sure whether you wanted a reflected-light or transmitted-light scope, and whether a normal or inverted set-up.  Any clues to your wishes for the article, whether ravenous ("I want ALL of them!"), sympathetic ("Choose the one ''you'' find prettiest") or practical ("A normal transmitted-light microscope would help the reader most"), would be most welcome. :) Cheery cheerio, off to dinner and knitting, [[User:WillowW|Willow]] ([[User talk:WillowW|talk]]) 22:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
544830 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544829 +++$+++ 544829 +++$+++ 2008-01-16 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.200553980E09 +++$+++ Wow! Thanks, you are right that a normal upright transmitted-light microscope would help the reader most, since this is probably what they will come across in school and university.  +++$+++ :Wow! Thanks, you are right that a normal upright transmitted-light microscope would help the reader most, since this is probably what they will come across in school and university. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 23:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

282687 +++$+++ Himalayan Explorer +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282687 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-13 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.255479480E09 +++$+++ New infobox looks good on Mongolian monasteries like [[Gandantegchinlen Monastery]] and [[Amarbayasgalant Monastery]] too! +++$+++ New infobox looks good on Mongolian monasteries like [[Gandantegchinlen Monastery]] and [[Amarbayasgalant Monastery]] too![[User talk:Himalayan Explorer| <span style="border:2px solid #C5B358 ;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:white;background:#B00760;">'''''Himalayan'''''</font>]]</span> 17:18, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
282688 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282687 +++$+++ 282687 +++$+++ 2009-10-13 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.255483020E09 +++$+++ The infoboxes look absolutely fabulous, my friend. Wonderful work once again! I will try to deal with your request re the colleges of Sera (which should not be too difficult) tomorrow if I can (I have been up almost all night with pain) and here, at 4.15 in the morning I am trying to settle a dispute on the [[Donghu]]. I may be too tired later - but, if so will get back to it soon I hope. Now I better try to finish what I was doing before I fall asleep. All best from me,  +++$+++ :The infoboxes look absolutely fabulous, my friend. Wonderful work once again! I will try to deal with your request re the colleges of Sera (which should not be too difficult) tomorrow if I can (I have been up almost all night with pain) and here, at 4.15 in the morning I am trying to settle a dispute on the [[Donghu]]. I may be too tired later - but, if so will get back to it soon I hope. Now I better try to finish what I was doing before I fall asleep. All best from me, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 18:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

20544 +++$+++ NeoNerd +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20544 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-18 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.182194220E09 +++$+++ I reverted your edit to the article, because it seemed to be comprised of unverifiable theories. I really am not a Harry Potter fan, So i don't really have any knowledge of the theories regarding any point of plot. It seemed as though it were an adition based on a personal theory (as I said, I have no idea if the theory is widespread or not), hence the OR summary. It may also be a poor understanding of [[WP:CRYSTAL]] on my part, but I thought that speculation on what is going to happen in future books is not allowed. However, if the theories you placed in the article are widesprread, then I suppose that they could probably go in. Sorry if I caused offence, just felt it was better to be s afe than sorry!-- +++$+++ I reverted your edit to the article, because it seemed to be comprised of unverifiable theories. I really am not a Harry Potter fan, So i don't really have any knowledge of the theories regarding any point of plot. It seemed as though it were an adition based on a personal theory (as I said, I have no idea if the theory is widespread or not), hence the OR summary. It may also be a poor understanding of [[WP:CRYSTAL]] on my part, but I thought that speculation on what is going to happen in future books is not allowed. However, if the theories you placed in the article are widesprread, then I suppose that they could probably go in. Sorry if I caused offence, just felt it was better to be s afe than sorry!--[[User:NeoNerd|NeoNerd]] 12:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
20545 +++$+++ NeoNerd +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20544 +++$+++ 20544 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.182194400E09 +++$+++ Re-reading the stuff I removed, I think I might have been a bit hasty in removing the first two paragraphs of it, since now I look closer, they are actually refereced (oops). However, the third paragraph seemed to be loosely based on a quote, but not the book itself. -- +++$+++ : Re-reading the stuff I removed, I think I might have been a bit hasty in removing the first two paragraphs of it, since now I look closer, they are actually refereced (oops). However, the third paragraph seemed to be loosely based on a quote, but not the book itself. --[[User:NeoNerd|NeoNerd]] 12:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
20546 +++$+++ NeoNerd +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20544 +++$+++ 20545 +++$+++ 2007-06-18 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.182195900E09 +++$+++ I don't really want to get get involved, since there does seem to be a bit of an acrimonious edit conflict going on. However, I will revert myself, since some of the material was sourced.-- +++$+++ :: I don't really want to get get involved, since there does seem to be a bit of an acrimonious edit conflict going on. However, I will revert myself, since some of the material was sourced.--[[User:NeoNerd|<font color="green">NeoNerd</font>]] 12:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

544834 +++$+++ ScienceApologist +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544834 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-19 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.200813000E09 +++$+++ There is a principle of one-way linking for fringe topics that prevents soapboxing. The idea is that if an idea is notable, we can discuss it in its relevant article. So if a homeopathic remedy is notable, it should be discussed in an article about the homeopathic remedy. However, homeopathy is rarely relevant outside the world of homeopathic medicine: most mainstream sources ignore it when describing plants or chemicals. Therefore, we should not be in the business of advertising homeopathy at those mainstream articles. Undue weight sometimes means no weight at all.  +++$+++ There is a principle of one-way linking for fringe topics that prevents soapboxing. The idea is that if an idea is notable, we can discuss it in its relevant article. So if a homeopathic remedy is notable, it should be discussed in an article about the homeopathic remedy. However, homeopathy is rarely relevant outside the world of homeopathic medicine: most mainstream sources ignore it when describing plants or chemicals. Therefore, we should not be in the business of advertising homeopathy at those mainstream articles. Undue weight sometimes means no weight at all. [[User:ScienceApologist|ScienceApologist]] ([[User talk:ScienceApologist|talk]]) 23:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
544835 +++$+++ ScienceApologist +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544834 +++$+++ 544834 +++$+++ 2008-01-20 00:47:00 +++$+++ 1.200818820E09 +++$+++ The issue is that homeopathic remedies rarely contain the substances they claim to use. It is only on the say-so of the homeopaths that substances are used in their remedies. This is far different than an herbalist or a folk medicine practioner or even a doctor of traditional Chinese medicine using the actual substance. Those are actual, verifiable, documented uses of the substance: their efficacy is beside the point. The homeopathist does not verifiably use any substance except for water, parafin, alcohol, and other solvents without solute.  +++$+++ :The issue is that homeopathic remedies rarely contain the substances they claim to use. It is only on the say-so of the homeopaths that substances are used in their remedies. This is far different than an herbalist or a folk medicine practioner or even a doctor of traditional Chinese medicine using the actual substance. Those are actual, verifiable, documented uses of the substance: their efficacy is beside the point. The homeopathist does not verifiably use any substance except for water, parafin, alcohol, and other solvents without solute. [[User:ScienceApologist|ScienceApologist]] ([[User talk:ScienceApologist|talk]]) 00:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

571403 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571403 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 08:48:00 +++$+++ 1.169570880E09 +++$+++ I'm not a copyright lawyer, but the location of a piece of art (which grafitti appears to fall under) is irrelevant to its copyright status. It doesn't matter if its plastered to a wall, the copyright still belongs to the artist. Nevertheless, seeing as grafitti artists want their work to be seen, they're unlikely to sue and since they're in a public place, nothing keeps you from photographing them legally. -  +++$+++ I'm not a copyright lawyer, but the location of a piece of art (which grafitti appears to fall under) is irrelevant to its copyright status. It doesn't matter if its plastered to a wall, the copyright still belongs to the artist. Nevertheless, seeing as grafitti artists want their work to be seen, they're unlikely to sue and since they're in a public place, nothing keeps you from photographing them legally. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 08:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
571404 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571403 +++$+++ 571403 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.169647140E09 +++$+++ Treat it like any other photograph. Ask permission from whoever did take the photograph. If you get it, you can release it under whatever license you were granted. -  +++$+++ *Treat it like any other photograph. Ask permission from whoever did take the photograph. If you get it, you can release it under whatever license you were granted. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 05:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

282694 +++$+++ Himalayan Explorer +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282694 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-17 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.255807080E09 +++$+++ I've responded to your email.. +++$+++ I've responded to your email..[[User talk:Himalayan Explorer| <span style="border:2px solid #C5B358 ;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:white;background:#B00760;">'''''Himalayan'''''</font>]]</span> 12:18, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
282695 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282694 +++$+++ 282694 +++$+++ 2009-10-17 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.255807380E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I look forward to getting it in the morning (it hasn't arrived yet). And thanks for all your sensible suggestions and help. I have already reduced some of my over-prolific use of portal boxes - will try to get more tomorrow. For now, goodnight from Down Under. Best,  +++$+++ :Thanks. I look forward to getting it in the morning (it hasn't arrived yet). And thanks for all your sensible suggestions and help. I have already reduced some of my over-prolific use of portal boxes - will try to get more tomorrow. For now, goodnight from Down Under. Best, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 12:23, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

20551 +++$+++ Chaser +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20551 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-21 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.182481320E09 +++$+++ Regarding [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/3RR&oldid=139712244#User:Sandpiper_reported_by_User:Folken_de_Fanel_.28Result:.29 this old 3RR report] about the Harry Potter book article, the edit war seems to have cooled, but please let me know on my talk page if you want someone to mediate or need admin intervention.-- +++$+++ Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&oldid=139712244#User:Sandpiper_reported_by_User:Folken_de_Fanel_.28Result:.29 this old 3RR report] about the Harry Potter book article, the edit war seems to have cooled, but please let me know on my talk page if you want someone to mediate or need admin intervention.--[[User:Chaser|Chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|T]] 20:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
20552 +++$+++ Chaser +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20551 +++$+++ 20551 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.182917400E09 +++$+++ Continuing the edit war at [[Horcrux]] is a really stupid way to solve this disagreement. Please use the talk page.-- +++$+++ :Continuing the edit war at [[Horcrux]] is a really stupid way to solve this disagreement. Please use the talk page.--[[User:Chaser|Chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|T]] 21:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

544840 +++$+++ Random Replicator +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544840 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-22 03:41:00 +++$+++ 1.201002060E09 +++$+++ Sorry Tim --- that was not meant to be an insult. I strongly feel the intro fills a need and they are written with dramatic differences in expectations of prior scientific knowledge. Suggesting a merge  --- apples and oranges. I do agree we are being pushed into too much detail; but changing a word from large to big does not solve that problem. Have you ever seen such a mine field; everywhere I step shit blows up!!!!! -- +++$+++ Sorry Tim --- that was not meant to be an insult. I strongly feel the intro fills a need and they are written with dramatic differences in expectations of prior scientific knowledge. Suggesting a merge  --- apples and oranges. I do agree we are being pushed into too much detail; but changing a word from large to big does not solve that problem. Have you ever seen such a mine field; everywhere I step shit blows up!!!!! --[[User:Random Replicator|Random Replicator]] ([[User talk:Random Replicator|talk]]) 03:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
544841 +++$+++ Random Replicator +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544840 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-22 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.201003320E09 +++$+++ Yea probably kicked back laughing ...... The FA guys gonna read all the endless rants that don't have anything to do with the article itself --- and flunk it ... hell probably take away the GA as punitive damage to all the endless nonsense. I think I have a Corona left... Cheers! -- +++$+++ :::Yea probably kicked back laughing ...... The FA guys gonna read all the endless rants that don't have anything to do with the article itself --- and flunk it ... hell probably take away the GA as punitive damage to all the endless nonsense. I think I have a Corona left... Cheers! --[[User:Random Replicator|Random Replicator]] ([[User talk:Random Replicator|talk]]) 04:02, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

20553 +++$+++ Ccrashh +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20553 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-27 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.182972600E09 +++$+++ Did you look at what I reverted as opposed to what you put back in?  They weren't the same at all.  Check the history.  +++$+++ Did you look at what I reverted as opposed to what you put back in?  They weren't the same at all.  Check the history. [[User:Ccrashh|Ccrashh]] 12:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
20554 +++$+++ Ccrashh +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20553 +++$+++ 20553 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.183056840E09 +++$+++ So you are saying I can post disputed content over and over again and not be considered engaged in vandalism?  Interesting.  Besides, I couldn't figure out what you were talking about, re:  the vandalism tag, at first.  On the anonymous user site, it doesn't appear to use that word.  Just the description of the history. So, in point of fact, I clicked the wrong button on Twinkle.  Sue me.  Still, the vandalism tag, in my opinion, in valid.  Just like using ONE source to support theories is valid in your opinion.  +++$+++ :So you are saying I can post disputed content over and over again and not be considered engaged in vandalism?  Interesting.  Besides, I couldn't figure out what you were talking about, re:  the vandalism tag, at first.  On the anonymous user site, it doesn't appear to use that word.  Just the description of the history. So, in point of fact, I clicked the wrong button on Twinkle.  Sue me.  Still, the vandalism tag, in my opinion, in valid.  Just like using ONE source to support theories is valid in your opinion. [[User:Ccrashh|Ccrashh]] 11:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

484023 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.199265780E09 +++$+++ If you still have my e-mail address, I wonder if you'd mind sending me a comment as to what you think I should do as regards the \"death threat\" situation. It will be a few days before I would see it.  +++$+++ If you still have my e-mail address, I wonder if you'd mind sending me a comment as to what you think I should do as regards the "death threat" situation. It will be a few days before I would see it. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 01:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
484024 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484023 +++$+++ 484023 +++$+++ 2008-01-02 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.199265960E09 +++$+++ Sure.  If you have another e-mail address you'll see sooner, let me know and I'll CC: there.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Sure.  If you have another e-mail address you'll see sooner, let me know and I'll CC: there.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 01:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
484025 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484023 +++$+++ 484024 +++$+++ 2008-01-02 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.199266380E09 +++$+++ I can't state what my other e-mail address is, or the guy might be able to find me. :) I'll read it when I get back to my home PC. Thanks for your help. :)  +++$+++ ::I can't state what my other e-mail address is, or the guy might be able to find me. :) I'll read it when I get back to my home PC. Thanks for your help. :) [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 01:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
484026 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484023 +++$+++ 484025 +++$+++ 2008-01-02 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.199266620E09 +++$+++ You can e-mail me the other e-mail address.  Use the \"E-mail this user\" if you forgot mine.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::You can e-mail me the other e-mail address.  Use the "E-mail this user" if you forgot mine.  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 01:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
484027 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484023 +++$+++ 484026 +++$+++ 2008-01-02 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.199267160E09 +++$+++ The other e-mail has my actual name. Go ahead and send the e-mail to my normal address (the one with the .com suffix) and I should be able to see it. :)  +++$+++ ::::The other e-mail has my actual name. Go ahead and send the e-mail to my normal address (the one with the .com suffix) and I should be able to see it. :) [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 01:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

544845 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-23 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.201145580E09 +++$+++ Check out [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Domestic_sheep&diff=186296578&oldid=186283415 this edit]. Seems kosher, but there's no source and I'm unsure if \"hypoxic insult\" is the correct term. Thanks,  +++$+++ Check out [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Domestic_sheep&diff=186296578&oldid=186283415 this edit]. Seems kosher, but there's no source and I'm unsure if "hypoxic insult" is the correct term. Thanks, [[User:VanTucky|'''Van''']][[User talk:VanTucky|<span style="color:#FF4F00">'''Tucky'''</span>]] 19:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
544846 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544845 +++$+++ 544845 +++$+++ 2008-01-23 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.201147800E09 +++$+++ Thanks a million Tim!  +++$+++ :Thanks a million Tim! [[User:VanTucky|'''Van''']][[User talk:VanTucky|<span style="color:#FF4F00">'''Tucky'''</span>]] 20:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
544847 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544845 +++$+++ 544846 +++$+++ 2008-01-23 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.201160700E09 +++$+++ Hey, thanks again for all the attention. I'm considering taking it to FA soon, but I'm a little hesitant bc I haven't personally nominated at FA before. Any advice for the article before I do?  +++$+++ ::Hey, thanks again for all the attention. I'm considering taking it to FA soon, but I'm a little hesitant bc I haven't personally nominated at FA before. Any advice for the article before I do? [[User:VanTucky|'''Van''']][[User talk:VanTucky|<span style="color:#FF4F00">'''Tucky'''</span>]] 23:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

571405 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571405 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 15:40:00 +++$+++ 1.169595600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for telling me about Daniel Bryant's RFA. I wanted to co-nom but it's too late now. :-\/ Your cyrillic confused me a bit for the unconventional usage you gave to the letters \u0445, \u0446 and \u044b. In the end I understood everything but I think the following would be an easier English cyrillic: \"\u043c\u0430\u0439 \u0432\u0430\u0439\u043a \u043a\u0438\u043f\u0441 \u043c\u0435\u0439\u043a\u0438\u043d\u0433 \u0434\u0438\u0441 \u0441\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u0441\u043b\u0430\u043a\u0438 \u043d\u043e\u0439\u0437, \u0443\u043e\u0442 \u0434\u0443 \u044e \u0442\u044a\u0438\u043d\u043a \u0434 \u0442\u0440\u043e\u0443\u0431\u043b \u0438\u0437 \u0434\u0435\u0440?\" :-) As for the fan, you should get yourself a [[Japanese war fan]]! You know the Japanese, they've been replacing bike components for thousands of years! Cheers! <strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ Thanks for telling me about Daniel Bryant's RFA. I wanted to co-nom but it's too late now. :-/ Your cyrillic confused me a bit for the unconventional usage you gave to the letters х, ц and ы. In the end I understood everything but I think the following would be an easier English cyrillic: "май вайк кипс мейкинг дис слики слаки нойз, уот ду ю тъинк д троубл из дер?" :-) As for the fan, you should get yourself a [[Japanese war fan]]! You know the Japanese, they've been replacing bike components for thousands of years! Cheers! <strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 15:40, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
571406 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571405 +++$+++ 571405 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.169627280E09 +++$+++ Uh-oh, something went wrong, coz you're #101! :-P Nah, it's awkward to co-nom after an RFA is launched. Cheers, <strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ :Uh-oh, something went wrong, coz you're #101! :-P Nah, it's awkward to co-nom after an RFA is launched. Cheers, <strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 00:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
571407 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571405 +++$+++ 571406 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.169628240E09 +++$+++ It's 0:44am here. Our time is currently the same as UTC. Convenient, eh? :-) <strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ ::It's 0:44am here. Our time is currently the same as UTC. Convenient, eh? :-) <strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 00:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
571408 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571405 +++$+++ 571407 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.169628840E09 +++$+++ I'm a night owl. I'll go to bed at 4:00am tonight just because I have classes tomorrow. <strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ :::I'm a night owl. I'll go to bed at 4:00am tonight just because I have classes tomorrow. <strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 00:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
571409 +++$+++ culverin +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571405 +++$+++ 571408 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.169647440E09 +++$+++ The sky rockets in flight.  '''[[User:culverin|<font color=\"darkblue\">Culv<\/font>]][[User:culverin\/EA|<font color=\"green\">e<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::::The sky rockets in flight.  '''[[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">Culv</font>]][[User:culverin/EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:culverin|<font color="darkblue">rin</font>]][[Special:Random|<font color="green">?</font>]]''' <small><sup> '''[[User_talk:Culverin|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]''' </sup></small> 06:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
571410 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571405 +++$+++ 571409 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.169711760E09 +++$+++ Qua? <font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"5\"> +++$+++ :::::Qua? <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="5">[[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] </sup>   </font> 23:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

20560 +++$+++ Scarian +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-21 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.187763600E09 +++$+++ A little while ago I removed a bunch of excess reviews in the critical reception list. I haven't paid much attention to the page since then but I have noticed reversion's here and there in my watch list. After taking a look at the said article and thus said section, I think it would be more advantageous if you cut down King's paragraph to just the \"meat\" - if you get me? All non-essential sentences could possibly be kicked out since we only need the essential's of what ''notable'' commentator's mean. Do you agree\/disagree? (Btw, I do think that the paragraph could\/should be there, but perhaps a shortened version. It takes up a fair amount of room in comparison to other crit. reviews in the section) [[Hooah]]  +++$+++ A little while ago I removed a bunch of excess reviews in the critical reception list. I haven't paid much attention to the page since then but I have noticed reversion's here and there in my watch list. After taking a look at the said article and thus said section, I think it would be more advantageous if you cut down King's paragraph to just the "meat" - if you get me? All non-essential sentences could possibly be kicked out since we only need the essential's of what ''notable'' commentator's mean. Do you agree/disagree? (Btw, I do think that the paragraph could/should be there, but perhaps a shortened version. It takes up a fair amount of room in comparison to other crit. reviews in the section) [[Hooah]] [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scar</font><font color="black" face="tahoma">ian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 23:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
20561 +++$+++ Scarian +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20560 +++$+++ 20560 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.187764560E09 +++$+++ Well, I am sorry sir but that's not up to you to decide. I shall open it up for discussion on the appropriate page. Thank you for your time.  +++$+++ :Well, I am sorry sir but that's not up to you to decide. I shall open it up for discussion on the appropriate page. Thank you for your time. [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scar</font><font color="black" face="tahoma">ian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 23:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
20562 +++$+++ Scarian +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20560 +++$+++ 20561 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.187765100E09 +++$+++ Buddy, I don't care about the size of plot, I don't care about ''the'' plot. (It's late here and I just want to sleep but I can't because I love Wikipedia) I really only care about the size of King's quote... I read it myself and sure, I agree with you, it's not bad. But an irrelevant sentence or two could go to allow other writer's a chance - rather than clogging it up to allow King more space. Despite King's \"authority\" as a writer, other critics' opinions are just as valid, do you understand where I am coming from, friend?  +++$+++ ::Buddy, I don't care about the size of plot, I don't care about ''the'' plot. (It's late here and I just want to sleep but I can't because I love Wikipedia) I really only care about the size of King's quote... I read it myself and sure, I agree with you, it's not bad. But an irrelevant sentence or two could go to allow other writer's a chance - rather than clogging it up to allow King more space. Despite King's "authority" as a writer, other critics' opinions are just as valid, do you understand where I am coming from, friend? [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scar</font><font color="black" face="tahoma">ian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]] 23:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

282706 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-23 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.256340180E09 +++$+++ May I take this opportunity of thanking you once again for your innumerable superb contributions to the common pool of knowledge that is the Wikipedia. You are truly a great inspiration to us all. All my very best wishes,  +++$+++ May I take this opportunity of thanking you once again for your innumerable superb contributions to the common pool of knowledge that is the Wikipedia. You are truly a great inspiration to us all. All my very best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 16:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
282707 +++$+++ PHG +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282706 +++$+++ 282706 +++$+++ 2009-10-23 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.256349180E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much for your message John, and congratulations again!!! ''' +++$+++ :Thank you so much for your message John, and congratulations again!!! '''[[User:PHG|<font color="Orange">PHG</font>]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:PHG|'''''Per Honor et Gloria''''']]</sup> 18:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

544851 +++$+++ AndrewGNF +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544851 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-24 18:15:00 +++$+++ 1.201227300E09 +++$+++ Tim, just wanted to say nice job on that [[Wikipedia:WikipediaWeekly\/Episode40|Wikipedia Weekly interview]].  You're an excellent ambassador for the MCB project.  If I may offer one minor comment on (not surprisingly) [[User:ProteinBoxBot|PBB]].  The key impact of PBB that I would emphasize would not be in all the information that it provides, but rather that it provides a credible stub to attract new content and ideally a whole army of new contributors.  All the database content is just a means to an end, and I hope it is all eventually diluted away or even removed by contributions from human editors.  Anyway, I know we're all on the same page looking from slightly different angles, so it's a minor comment on an excellent portrayal of what we're all about.  Bravo...  +++$+++ Tim, just wanted to say nice job on that [[Wikipedia:WikipediaWeekly/Episode40|Wikipedia Weekly interview]].  You're an excellent ambassador for the MCB project.  If I may offer one minor comment on (not surprisingly) [[User:ProteinBoxBot|PBB]].  The key impact of PBB that I would emphasize would not be in all the information that it provides, but rather that it provides a credible stub to attract new content and ideally a whole army of new contributors.  All the database content is just a means to an end, and I hope it is all eventually diluted away or even removed by contributions from human editors.  Anyway, I know we're all on the same page looking from slightly different angles, so it's a minor comment on an excellent portrayal of what we're all about.  Bravo... [[User:AndrewGNF|AndrewGNF]] ([[User talk:AndrewGNF|talk]]) 18:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
544852 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544851 +++$+++ 544851 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.201240440E09 +++$+++ That was really nice; I listened to it twice already. :)  I agree, you did an excellent job as ambassador and I think you came across very well to the listeners.  I had to smile when you seemed at a loss after [[User:Witty lama|Witty lama]] asked about [[WP:FA|Featured Articles]] from the [[WP:MCB|MCB WikiProject]]; quite a dilemma for a self-effacing editor! \"Quick, think: which one did I ''not'' write?\" ;)  I was a little embarrassed myself to be mentioned, but at least it's good motivation for me to finish off those remaining [[protease]]s and [[nuclease]]s and whatnot.  I still owe you a microscope model, too, but it's proving rather hard to do it as nicely as I wanted; ''and'' I got distracted into crafting a gift. Oh well, no rest for the wicked, and well done once again :)  +++$+++ :That was really nice; I listened to it twice already. :)  I agree, you did an excellent job as ambassador and I think you came across very well to the listeners.  I had to smile when you seemed at a loss after [[User:Witty lama|Witty lama]] asked about [[WP:FA|Featured Articles]] from the [[WP:MCB|MCB WikiProject]]; quite a dilemma for a self-effacing editor! "Quick, think: which one did I ''not'' write?" ;)  I was a little embarrassed myself to be mentioned, but at least it's good motivation for me to finish off those remaining [[protease]]s and [[nuclease]]s and whatnot.  I still owe you a microscope model, too, but it's proving rather hard to do it as nicely as I wanted; ''and'' I got distracted into crafting a gift. Oh well, no rest for the wicked, and well done once again :) [[User:WillowW|Willow]] ([[User talk:WillowW|talk]]) 21:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
544853 +++$+++ AndrewGNF +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544851 +++$+++ 544852 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.201240980E09 +++$+++ Oh, for what it's worth [[User:WillowW|Willow]], you absolutely deserved the mention in Tim's overview of MCB.  No question.  PBB would have gladly traded air time to highlight more of your contributions...  +++$+++ ::Oh, for what it's worth [[User:WillowW|Willow]], you absolutely deserved the mention in Tim's overview of MCB.  No question.  PBB would have gladly traded air time to highlight more of your contributions... [[User:AndrewGNF|AndrewGNF]] ([[User talk:AndrewGNF|talk]]) 22:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

282710 +++$+++ LaGrandefr +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-25 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.256513760E09 +++$+++ Hi, I happen to find a speech of Dalai Lama XIII in 1932[http:\/\/www.thesnowlion.com\/apropheticwarning.html] and I don't know if it is the same as your quotation in the article \"[[Tibet]]\". I suppose not because they almost have nothing in commun. Regards-- +++$+++ Hi, I happen to find a speech of Dalai Lama XIII in 1932[http://www.thesnowlion.com/apropheticwarning.html] and I don't know if it is the same as your quotation in the article "[[Tibet]]". I suppose not because they almost have nothing in commun. Regards--[[User:LaGrandefr|LaGrandefr]] ([[User talk:LaGrandefr|talk]]) 16:36, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
282711 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282710 +++$+++ 282710 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.256535540E09 +++$+++ Hi! Both these statements come from the same document which is usually referred to as ''The Prophecies of the Great Thirteenth'', but from different parts of it. The passage I quoted is a statement of what he had done in regards to declaring Tibet to be independant. The more prophetic portions of the statement come later in the piece. An excellent translation into English of the whole document can be found in Glenn H. Mullin's book, ''The Fourteen Dalai Lamas: A Sacred Legacy of Reincarnation\" (2001). Clear Light Publishers, Santa Fe, New Mexico, pp. 435-440. I suggest you try to find a copy and read the whole thing which is, indeed, of great interest. All best wishes,  +++$+++ :Hi! Both these statements come from the same document which is usually referred to as ''The Prophecies of the Great Thirteenth'', but from different parts of it. The passage I quoted is a statement of what he had done in regards to declaring Tibet to be independant. The more prophetic portions of the statement come later in the piece. An excellent translation into English of the whole document can be found in Glenn H. Mullin's book, ''The Fourteen Dalai Lamas: A Sacred Legacy of Reincarnation" (2001). Clear Light Publishers, Santa Fe, New Mexico, pp. 435-440. I suggest you try to find a copy and read the whole thing which is, indeed, of great interest. All best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:39, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

615097 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-18 15:32:00 +++$+++ 1.242685920E09 +++$+++ Adding a template to a user page will not actually block them. To block a user you have to be an [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrator]]. I have removed the notice from their talk page.  +++$+++ Adding a template to a user page will not actually block them. To block a user you have to be an [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrator]]. I have removed the notice from their talk page. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|Enter CambridgeBayWeather,]] [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|waits for audience applause,]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|not a sausage]] 15:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
615098 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615097 +++$+++ 615097 +++$+++ 2009-05-18 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.242703920E09 +++$+++ Let's see if this will help, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_page_protection&diff=290788995&oldid=290784389 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection].  +++$+++ :Let's see if this will help, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_page_protection&diff=290788995&oldid=290784389 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection]. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|Enter CambridgeBayWeather,]] [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|waits for audience applause,]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|not a sausage]] 20:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

282713 +++$+++ Himalayan Explorer +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-29 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.256865420E09 +++$+++ I wondered if you could recommend the best book on [[Ladakh]]. FOr Christmas, what would be the most detailed book (with lots of beautiful photographs) of Ladakh? +++$+++ I wondered if you could recommend the best book on [[Ladakh]]. FOr Christmas, what would be the most detailed book (with lots of beautiful photographs) of Ladakh?[[User talk:Himalayan Explorer| <span style="border:2px solid #C5B358 ;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:white;background:#B00760;">'''''Himalayan'''''</font>]]</span> 18:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
282714 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282713 +++$+++ 282713 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 10:45:00 +++$+++ 1.256924700E09 +++$+++ Probably the best single modern and reasonably priced book on Ladakh in terms of text is: Rizvi, Janet. 1998. ''Ladakh, Crossroads of High Asia''. Oxford University Press. 1st edition 1963. 2nd revised edition 1996. 3rd impression 2001. ISBN 019 564546 4. But, in terms of pictures - I really don't know what to recommend - there are so many - and they are all lovely. Some of the best work has been done by Japanese photographers. I suggest you do a bit of searching at Amazon.com. Sorry I can't be of more help. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Probably the best single modern and reasonably priced book on Ladakh in terms of text is: Rizvi, Janet. 1998. ''Ladakh, Crossroads of High Asia''. Oxford University Press. 1st edition 1963. 2nd revised edition 1996. 3rd impression 2001. ISBN 019 564546 4. But, in terms of pictures - I really don't know what to recommend - there are so many - and they are all lovely. Some of the best work has been done by Japanese photographers. I suggest you do a bit of searching at Amazon.com. Sorry I can't be of more help. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 10:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

282715 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282715 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-29 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.256860260E09 +++$+++ So, should you have access to Zahiruddin Ahmad's original article, it would be cool if you could check out the quote. Regards,  +++$+++ So, should you have access to Zahiruddin Ahmad's original article, it would be cool if you could check out the quote. Regards, [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 16:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
282716 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282715 +++$+++ 282715 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.256924400E09 +++$+++ Sorry - I have never heard of Zahiruddin Ahmad before so I can't really help you, but the quote from him that you give above is demonstrably wrong - Chinese control over Tibet was very tenuous at times, as I have pointed out in many place,. The Tibetans even stationed troops along the borders of China in the late 19th century to prevent incursions and Qing had little influence in Lhasa. Chinese influence tended to wax and wane. \"Absolute control\" is really stretching things much too far. Have a look at the section on \"History and Strategic importance\" in the article on [[Batang Town]] for starters. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Sorry - I have never heard of Zahiruddin Ahmad before so I can't really help you, but the quote from him that you give above is demonstrably wrong - Chinese control over Tibet was very tenuous at times, as I have pointed out in many place,. The Tibetans even stationed troops along the borders of China in the late 19th century to prevent incursions and Qing had little influence in Lhasa. Chinese influence tended to wax and wane. "Absolute control" is really stretching things much too far. Have a look at the section on "History and Strategic importance" in the article on [[Batang Town]] for starters. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 10:40, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
282717 +++$+++ Yaan +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282715 +++$+++ 282716 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.257303900E09 +++$+++ I see. My question was specifically about the quote, since I suspected you might have a better access to literature than I do. My suspicion was someone read the quote in Grunfeld, saw that Grunfeld attributed it to Zahiruddin Ahmad and added it to WP under that other name (plus extrapolated a bit). Zahiruddin Ahmad seems to have written a few books about Tibet which were quite well-received by the academia, so I suspect he wouldn't claim western missionaries witnessed much of what the Qing did in Tibet.  +++$+++ ::I see. My question was specifically about the quote, since I suspected you might have a better access to literature than I do. My suspicion was someone read the quote in Grunfeld, saw that Grunfeld attributed it to Zahiruddin Ahmad and added it to WP under that other name (plus extrapolated a bit). Zahiruddin Ahmad seems to have written a few books about Tibet which were quite well-received by the academia, so I suspect he wouldn't claim western missionaries witnessed much of what the Qing did in Tibet. [[User:Yaan|Yaan]] ([[User talk:Yaan|talk]]) 19:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

20573 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-10 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.194690900E09 +++$+++ You make a good point. Any decent farm will have more acreage, and get a bigger subsidy, than the mentioned aristocrats.  +++$+++ You make a good point. Any decent farm will have more acreage, and get a bigger subsidy, than the mentioned aristocrats. [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 02:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
20574 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20573 +++$+++ 20573 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.194736860E09 +++$+++ I think obtaining money under the CAP has absolutely nothing to do with competence as a farmer. +++$+++ :I think obtaining money under the CAP has absolutely nothing to do with competence as a farmer.[[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] 15:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
20575 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20573 +++$+++ 20574 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.194738060E09 +++$+++ It seems not, although the requirements are quite complex. There seems to be requirements that the land be maintained as farmland and be farmed. And there seems to be a wide variety of subsidies and other payments for different crops, like bees, for example. My point was that a full-time farmer needs considerable land to be fully employed, more than the few hundred acres cultivated on some of the estates mentioned. I speak of grain and similar crops, of course, that are amenable to large scale commercial production.  +++$+++ ::It seems not, although the requirements are quite complex. There seems to be requirements that the land be maintained as farmland and be farmed. And there seems to be a wide variety of subsidies and other payments for different crops, like bees, for example. My point was that a full-time farmer needs considerable land to be fully employed, more than the few hundred acres cultivated on some of the estates mentioned. I speak of grain and similar crops, of course, that are amenable to large scale commercial production. [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 15:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

282718 +++$+++ PHG +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-30 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.256909100E09 +++$+++ Hi John! I ordered your book online today! Cheers! ''' +++$+++ Hi John! I ordered your book online today! Cheers! '''[[User:PHG|<font color="Orange">PHG</font>]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:PHG|'''''Per Honor et Gloria''''']]</sup> 06:25, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
282719 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282718 +++$+++ 282718 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.256924100E09 +++$+++ I am honoured - I hope you really find things that interest you in it. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I am honoured - I hope you really find things that interest you in it. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 10:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

265573 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.163125020E09 +++$+++ I see that this multiple name thing for a place is a big problem. I guess you should contact the guys who have edited the page Shivanasamudra and see if you can get concensus about what the merge to what. Which name is more popular? Locals call it Shivanasamudra, though we tend to call it Shivasamudra\/samudram. See what news paper articles call it (which may again lead to same confusion). I will look today in my KA map and see what the map says. By the way, what are those {{fact}} tags doing on the page you created. +++$+++ I see that this multiple name thing for a place is a big problem. I guess you should contact the guys who have edited the page Shivanasamudra and see if you can get concensus about what the merge to what. Which name is more popular? Locals call it Shivanasamudra, though we tend to call it Shivasamudra/samudram. See what news paper articles call it (which may again lead to same confusion). I will look today in my KA map and see what the map says. By the way, what are those {{fact}} tags doing on the page you created.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265574 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265573 +++$+++ 265573 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.163125560E09 +++$+++ Hi, sorry to break this to you.  See [[Shivanasamudram]].  -- +++$+++ :Hi, sorry to break this to you.  See [[Shivanasamudram]].  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265575 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265573 +++$+++ 265573 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.163125620E09 +++$+++ Oops, I see you are already aware.  Yes, the name thing is unfortunate.  -- +++$+++ :Oops, I see you are already aware.  Yes, the name thing is unfortunate.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265576 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265573 +++$+++ 265575 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.163131980E09 +++$+++ Hi again, in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Karnataka&curid=16880&diff=86781181&oldid=86775772 this page], [[Shivanasamudra]] falls, is the same as the [[Sivasamudram Falls]] that you added.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Hi again, in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karnataka&curid=16880&diff=86781181&oldid=86775772 this page], [[Shivanasamudra]] falls, is the same as the [[Sivasamudram Falls]] that you added.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 20:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265577 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265573 +++$+++ 265576 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.163133600E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm sorry the naming situation is so frustrating.  A minor point.  Dinesh is usually a male name, so I am strongly guessing that [[User:Dineshkannambadi]] is male.  Please, I am not trying to embarrass you, but I thought you should know.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::Hi, I'm sorry the naming situation is so frustrating.  A minor point.  Dinesh is usually a male name, so I am strongly guessing that [[User:Dineshkannambadi]] is male.  Please, I am not trying to embarrass you, but I thought you should know.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 20:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265578 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265573 +++$+++ 265577 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.163134560E09 +++$+++ No, I don't think he would get upset about that.  No need to worry. -- +++$+++ ::::No, I don't think he would get upset about that.  No need to worry. --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 20:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

20576 +++$+++ Lear 21 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-13 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.195012440E09 +++$+++ A Non-European view: [https:\/\/www.cia.gov\/library\/publications\/the-world-factbook\/geos\/ee.html]  +++$+++ A Non-European view: [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ee.html] [[User:Lear 21|Lear 21]] 19:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
20577 +++$+++ Simonclamb +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20576 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.195019820E09 +++$+++ Surely this is vandalism of a users page here Lear. Many Americans couldn't find you Europe on a map. If you take the American government's view as gospel on what the EU is, haha, ah well, I don't really have to say do I. -- +++$+++ ::Surely this is vandalism of a users page here Lear. Many Americans couldn't find you Europe on a map. If you take the American government's view as gospel on what the EU is, haha, ah well, I don't really have to say do I. --[[User:Simonclamb|Simonski]] 21:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

282721 +++$+++ Davin +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282721 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-31 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.257035940E09 +++$+++ Could you please help me in understanding the difference and subdivision of three articles concerning Dunhuang? If I state: \"''two of the [[Dunhuang manuscripts]] are 1) [[Old Tibetan Chronicle]] and 2) [[Tibetan Annals]]''\", have I made a correct subdivision in this way? I hope you can help; thank you in advance. Best regards,  +++$+++ Could you please help me in understanding the difference and subdivision of three articles concerning Dunhuang? If I state: "''two of the [[Dunhuang manuscripts]] are 1) [[Old Tibetan Chronicle]] and 2) [[Tibetan Annals]]''", have I made a correct subdivision in this way? I hope you can help; thank you in advance. Best regards, [[User:Davin|Davin]] ([[User talk:Davin|talk]]) 17:39, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
282722 +++$+++ Davin +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282721 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-01 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.257092460E09 +++$+++ The numbers were just to give an accurate example and aren't necessary indeed. It's clear for me now. The matter of fact is that I would like to make a translation of them in Dutch. Thank you for your answer (and for the articles of course).  +++$+++ ::The numbers were just to give an accurate example and aren't necessary indeed. It's clear for me now. The matter of fact is that I would like to make a translation of them in Dutch. Thank you for your answer (and for the articles of course). [[User:Davin|Davin]] ([[User talk:Davin|talk]]) 08:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

282724 +++$+++ Himalayan Explorer +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-01 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.257138900E09 +++$+++ You may also be interested in [[Ulug Depe]] and  [[Ulugh Beg Observatory]]! +++$+++ You may also be interested in [[Ulug Depe]] and  [[Ulugh Beg Observatory]]![[User talk:Himalayan Explorer| <span style="border:2px solid #C5B358 ;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:white;background:#B00760;">'''''Himalayan'''''</font>]]</span> 21:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
282725 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282724 +++$+++ 282724 +++$+++ 2009-11-02 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.257187080E09 +++$+++ Hi Explorer! Sorry I have been so uncommunicative. I am sending out thousands (literally) of E-brochures advertising my new book and hardly have time to brush my teeth. As the book is self-published no one else is going to do much advertising for me and anyway, I am trying to target people with a particular interest in Asian history or anything to do with the Silk routes. I had no idea there were so many academics in the world interested in Asia and the Silk routes! It quite boggles the mind and makes the back and fingers very tender. I have had a look at the articles you have been working on above - and I do have quite a lot I could add to them. Its just a matter of time and the frailities of the flesh. Will see what I can do, when I can. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi Explorer! Sorry I have been so uncommunicative. I am sending out thousands (literally) of E-brochures advertising my new book and hardly have time to brush my teeth. As the book is self-published no one else is going to do much advertising for me and anyway, I am trying to target people with a particular interest in Asian history or anything to do with the Silk routes. I had no idea there were so many academics in the world interested in Asia and the Silk routes! It quite boggles the mind and makes the back and fingers very tender. I have had a look at the articles you have been working on above - and I do have quite a lot I could add to them. Its just a matter of time and the frailities of the flesh. Will see what I can do, when I can. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 10:38, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
282726 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282724 +++$+++ 282724 +++$+++ 2009-11-02 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.257186720E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, this is one of those arguments which tends to split along nationalist lines on many Wikipedia pages leading often to protracted bitter debates and edit wars, wasting everyone's time and putting everyon in a very negative space. I have no easy answer to these problems except to beg everyone to try to be fair and balanced. It is true that culturally these places can be considered part of the wider sphere of \"Greater Iran\". But,, equally most of these regions fall under the political entity we call Afghanistan today - and they do have a separte history to Iran as such as well as characteristics and influences from far beyond the Iranic world. Can we not include both views - without one dominating, and discuss the issues in both articles?  +++$+++ :Unfortunately, this is one of those arguments which tends to split along nationalist lines on many Wikipedia pages leading often to protracted bitter debates and edit wars, wasting everyone's time and putting everyon in a very negative space. I have no easy answer to these problems except to beg everyone to try to be fair and balanced. It is true that culturally these places can be considered part of the wider sphere of "Greater Iran". But,, equally most of these regions fall under the political entity we call Afghanistan today - and they do have a separte history to Iran as such as well as characteristics and influences from far beyond the Iranic world. Can we not include both views - without one dominating, and discuss the issues in both articles? [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 10:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

20582 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ <span style=\"font: 13pt 'Arial';\">\xab<\/span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style=\"color: #000;\">talk<\/span>]])''' 04:48 [[2008]] [[January 2]] (UTC) +++$+++ <span style="font: 13pt 'Arial';">«</span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style="color: #000;">talk</span>]])''' 04:48 [[2008]] [[January 2]] (UTC)
20583 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20582 +++$+++ 20582 +++$+++ 2008-01-02 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.199297640E09 +++$+++ I got into this because I was looking for illustrations for another article, and Roberts did some drawings. Having discovered a bit about him it seemed likely he was a good enough artist that he ought to have an article. However, he is not long enough dead to have earnt a place in history and just too long dead to have got onto the internet for sourcing. On the whole, I don't think he was too good at marketing.  +++$+++ :I got into this because I was looking for illustrations for another article, and Roberts did some drawings. Having discovered a bit about him it seemed likely he was a good enough artist that he ought to have an article. However, he is not long enough dead to have earnt a place in history and just too long dead to have got onto the internet for sourcing. On the whole, I don't think he was too good at marketing. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] ([[User talk:Sandpiper|talk]]) 10:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
20584 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20582 +++$+++ 20583 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ <span style=\"font: 13pt 'Arial';\">\xab<\/span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style=\"color: #000;\">talk<\/span>]])''' 16:36 [[2008]] [[January 2]] (UTC) +++$+++ ::<span style="font: 13pt 'Arial';">«</span> '''[[:User:dtrebbien|D Trebbien]] ([[:User_talk:dtrebbien|<span style="color: #000;">talk</span>]])''' 16:36 [[2008]] [[January 2]] (UTC)

544871 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544871 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-31 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.201851240E09 +++$+++ Tim, I'm trying to help {{user|Fainites}} clean up the refs on [[Reactive attachment disorder]], which have inconsistent formatting.  We're both having problems getting the DOIs right (for example, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Reactive_attachment_disorder&diff=next&oldid=188261215 here]).  Do you have time to take a look?  I'll also post to Eubulides and Colin to see who gets there first.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Tim, I'm trying to help {{user|Fainites}} clean up the refs on [[Reactive attachment disorder]], which have inconsistent formatting.  We're both having problems getting the DOIs right (for example, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reactive_attachment_disorder&diff=next&oldid=188261215 here]).  Do you have time to take a look?  I'll also post to Eubulides and Colin to see who gets there first.  Thanks, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
544872 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544871 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-02-01 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.201854600E09 +++$+++ ''For the Mediation Committee,'' <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' <font face="Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</font> 00:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

282728 +++$+++ PHG +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-13 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.258166940E09 +++$+++ Hi John! I just received today you book '''''Through the Jade Gate to Rome''''' through Amazon. Quite an amazing and hefty piece of work! Congratulations again! ''' +++$+++ Hi John! I just received today you book '''''Through the Jade Gate to Rome''''' through Amazon. Quite an amazing and hefty piece of work! Congratulations again! '''[[User:PHG|<font color="Orange">PHG</font>]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:PHG|'''''Per Honor et Gloria''''']]</sup> 18:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
282729 +++$+++ PHG +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282728 +++$+++ 282728 +++$+++ 2009-11-16 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.258424880E09 +++$+++ Hi John! How funny! But also how irritating it must have been to discover this right on the cover page! I'm also quite irritated that I hadn't found it myself: \u6f22 and \u6f20 do look quite similar when incorporated into a line where the other characters match. I was actually wondering how you managed to compile such complicated and antiquated text as the ''Hou Hanshu''. How did you find all the character sets? Do you own a Chinese computer that has all the ideograms? I'll be glad to keep the copy as it is: the more history a book has, the better! Wonderful reading by the way... Best regards ''' +++$+++ :Hi John! How funny! But also how irritating it must have been to discover this right on the cover page! I'm also quite irritated that I hadn't found it myself: 漢 and 漠 do look quite similar when incorporated into a line where the other characters match. I was actually wondering how you managed to compile such complicated and antiquated text as the ''Hou Hanshu''. How did you find all the character sets? Do you own a Chinese computer that has all the ideograms? I'll be glad to keep the copy as it is: the more history a book has, the better! Wonderful reading by the way... Best regards '''[[User:PHG|<font color="Orange">PHG</font>]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:PHG|'''''Per Honor et Gloria''''']]</sup> 18:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
282730 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282728 +++$+++ 282729 +++$+++ 2009-11-17 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.258466640E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for all the kind comments. I really hope you find it a worthwhile addition to your library. Do let me know please if you have any criticisms, suggestions or comments. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Thanks so much for all the kind comments. I really hope you find it a worthwhile addition to your library. Do let me know please if you have any criticisms, suggestions or comments. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 06:04, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

484028 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484028 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-05 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.199526240E09 +++$+++ I'm guessing from the broken English that this is the same guy, using a new ID. His first entry is about a day after the others were blocked. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Baseball_Bugs&diff=prev&oldid=182165196]  +++$+++ I'm guessing from the broken English that this is the same guy, using a new ID. His first entry is about a day after the others were blocked. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Baseball_Bugs&diff=prev&oldid=182165196] [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 01:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
484029 +++$+++ Iron Valley +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484028 +++$+++ 484028 +++$+++ 2008-01-05 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.199571600E09 +++$+++ Excuse me Baseball Bugs I am not that \"person\" your refering to okay. I was getting tired of this \"dispute\" on the boards okay. I was saying on your talk page that this \"person\" deserves a second chance.  +++$+++ : Excuse me Baseball Bugs I am not that "person" your refering to okay. I was getting tired of this "dispute" on the boards okay. I was saying on your talk page that this "person" deserves a second chance. [[User:Iron Valley|Iron Valley]] ([[User talk:Iron Valley|talk]]) 14:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

20586 +++$+++ 88.82.32.84 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20586 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-10 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.202674260E09 +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions\/88.82.32.84|88.82.32.84]] ( +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions/88.82.32.84|88.82.32.84]] ([[User talk:88.82.32.84|talk]]) 12:11, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
20587 +++$+++ Simonclamb +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20586 +++$+++ 20586 +++$+++ 2008-02-11 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.202767560E09 +++$+++ Jeez, drop it already! Its such a pointless discussion for as long as there is no agreement on the issue in the wider scheme of things (ie. between the member states, experts, academics etc) -- +++$+++ :Jeez, drop it already! Its such a pointless discussion for as long as there is no agreement on the issue in the wider scheme of things (ie. between the member states, experts, academics etc) --[[User:Simonclamb|Simonski]] ([[User talk:Simonclamb|talk]]) 14:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

527719 +++$+++ Abu badali +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-28 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.180384920E09 +++$+++ Hi, ^demon. Why do you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Image:Bev_Bivens_-_San_Francisco_1965.JPG&curid=10797077&diff=133908395&oldid=129069599 believe] this image is not replaceable? Isn't it just being used to illustrate how some person looks like? --'' +++$+++ Hi, ^demon. Why do you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Bev_Bivens_-_San_Francisco_1965.JPG&curid=10797077&diff=133908395&oldid=129069599 believe] this image is not replaceable? Isn't it just being used to illustrate how some person looks like? --''[[User:Abu badali|Abu badali]] <sup>([[User_talk:Abu badali|talk]])</sup>'' 13:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
527720 +++$+++ Eastmain +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527719 +++$+++ 527719 +++$+++ 2007-05-28 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.180385700E09 +++$+++ As I noted on the image description page, the photograph is historical (taken in 1965), and is therefore not replaceable. She doesn't look like that today, 42 years later, and it's more encyclopedic to show an image of someone as they appeared at the peak of their career. -- +++$+++ *As I noted on the image description page, the photograph is historical (taken in 1965), and is therefore not replaceable. She doesn't look like that today, 42 years later, and it's more encyclopedic to show an image of someone as they appeared at the peak of their career. --[[User:Eastmain|Eastmain]] 13:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

20590 +++$+++ Lear 21 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-08 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.205004360E09 +++$+++ content, which is neither convincing, neither has majority, and neither complies to Wikipedia recommendations.  +++$+++ content, which is neither convincing, neither has majority, and neither complies to Wikipedia recommendations. [[User:Lear 21|Lear 21]] ([[User talk:Lear 21|talk]]) 11:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
20591 +++$+++ Simonclamb +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20590 +++$+++ 20590 +++$+++ 2008-03-08 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.205011620E09 +++$+++ Lear I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that you are, frankly, insane. -- +++$+++ :Lear I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that you are, frankly, insane. --[[User:Simonclamb|Simonski]] ([[User talk:Simonclamb|talk]]) 13:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

282736 +++$+++ Himalayan Explorer +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282736 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-22 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.258953780E09 +++$+++ GRRR why don't those darned people say WHERE IT ACTUALLY IS. It is getting very frustrating finding image slike [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/kentwang\/22050479\/ this] and it just called \"Tibet\". You know I had to work out which county photos which had point locations on them earlier so I could upload it to the right article. Check out [[Doilungd\xeaq\xean County]], [[Haixi Mongol and Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture]] etc. The source didn't have a single label in them! +++$+++ GRRR why don't those darned people say WHERE IT ACTUALLY IS. It is getting very frustrating finding image slike [http://www.flickr.com/photos/kentwang/22050479/ this] and it just called "Tibet". You know I had to work out which county photos which had point locations on them earlier so I could upload it to the right article. Check out [[Doilungdêqên County]], [[Haixi Mongol and Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture]] etc. The source didn't have a single label in them![[User talk:Himalayan Explorer| <span style="border:2px solid #C5B358 ;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:white;background:#B00760;">'''''Himalayan'''''</font>]]</span> 21:23, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
282737 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282736 +++$+++ 282736 +++$+++ 2009-11-23 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.258963200E09 +++$+++ Half the time the photographers would not know where they are - you are lucky they got Tibet right - that's a start - you have to admit! ;^)). The rest of the frustration is probably due to your karmic history which is presenting you with the wonderful opportunity to learn how to practice patience, an important, if not essential, step on the path to Liberation. Patience, humility, dogged perseverance and an openness to to whatever the universe presents you with will undoubtedly help you progress quickly. I also find a little swearing useful at times. :^)) Good luck with it all - you are doing a sterling job which will undoubtedly help bring innumerable beings closer to enlightenment - we do appreciate it. Thanks, my friend. +++$+++ :Half the time the photographers would not know where they are - you are lucky they got Tibet right - that's a start - you have to admit! ;^)). The rest of the frustration is probably due to your karmic history which is presenting you with the wonderful opportunity to learn how to practice patience, an important, if not essential, step on the path to Liberation. Patience, humility, dogged perseverance and an openness to to whatever the universe presents you with will undoubtedly help you progress quickly. I also find a little swearing useful at times. :^)) Good luck with it all - you are doing a sterling job which will undoubtedly help bring innumerable beings closer to enlightenment - we do appreciate it. Thanks, my friend.[[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 00:00, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

20593 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-22 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.206240900E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on <span class=\"plainlinks\">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target={{PAGENAMEE}}&namespace=6}} this link]<\/span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before [[13 July]] [[2006]]), per our [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria|non-free content policy]].  If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target={{PAGENAMEE}}&namespace=6}} this link]</span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before [[13 July]] [[2006]]), per our [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria|non-free content policy]].  If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice --> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 19:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
20594 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20593 +++$+++ 20593 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.206240900E09 +++$+++ On an unrelated note, have you considered archiving your talk page? It's pretty long...  +++$+++ :On an unrelated note, have you considered archiving your talk page? It's pretty long... [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 19:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
20595 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20593 +++$+++ 20594 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.206250740E09 +++$+++ I have replied on the image's talk page.  +++$+++ ::I have replied on the image's talk page. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 22:39, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

376421 +++$+++ Wikigi +++$+++ ArnoldReinhold +++$+++ 376421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-08 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.228804740E09 +++$+++ Hello, found [[Talk:Fish_farming#WP:OWN|this]] as I'm having some concern regarding the contributions of  [[User_talk:Geronimo20#Images|Geronimo20]]. See my discussion page at [[User_talk:Wikigi#Fishing_templates]] and December 2008. It seems that the issue has been raised before by contributors like yourself and that all discussions have been later deleted by Geronimo20, he does edit his own talk page on a regular basis to remove all trace of conflicts or adverse opinions. Any support would be appreciated, thanks -  +++$+++ Hello, found [[Talk:Fish_farming#WP:OWN|this]] as I'm having some concern regarding the contributions of  [[User_talk:Geronimo20#Images|Geronimo20]]. See my discussion page at [[User_talk:Wikigi#Fishing_templates]] and December 2008. It seems that the issue has been raised before by contributors like yourself and that all discussions have been later deleted by Geronimo20, he does edit his own talk page on a regular basis to remove all trace of conflicts or adverse opinions. Any support would be appreciated, thanks - [[User:Wikigi|Wikigi]] | [[User talk:Wikigi|talk to me]] | 22:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
376422 +++$+++ Wikigi +++$+++ ArnoldReinhold +++$+++ 376421 +++$+++ 376421 +++$+++ 2008-12-10 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.228939920E09 +++$+++ Hi there, would you a take moment to give your opinion [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Fisheries_and_Fishing#WP:OWN|here]] on the matter (removing of left-aligned images in some article lead, images often already within a navigation box), your previous position is being taken in consideration, thanks. -  +++$+++ :Hi there, would you a take moment to give your opinion [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Fisheries_and_Fishing#WP:OWN|here]] on the matter (removing of left-aligned images in some article lead, images often already within a navigation box), your previous position is being taken in consideration, thanks. - [[User:Wikigi|Wikigi]] | [[User talk:Wikigi|talk to me]] | 12:12, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
376423 +++$+++ ArnoldReinhold +++$+++ ArnoldReinhold +++$+++ 376421 +++$+++ 376421 +++$+++ 2008-12-10 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.228969680E09 +++$+++ I really don't have a strong opinion on this question. I'd go along with whatever consensus emerges on the talk page.-- +++$+++ :I really don't have a strong opinion on this question. I'd go along with whatever consensus emerges on the talk page.--[[User:ArnoldReinhold|agr]] ([[User talk:ArnoldReinhold#top|talk]]) 20:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

282740 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282740 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-06 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.260127440E09 +++$+++ [[Talk:Kangding County]]??? +++$+++ [[Talk:Kangding County]]???[[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 11:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
282741 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282740 +++$+++ 282740 +++$+++ 2009-12-10 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.260514260E09 +++$+++ I have just had a look at my note and, to be honest, I really don't know what I was thinking about at the time - I don't even remember writing it. (It's a real worry! I wonder whether it is due to the onset of senility or all the painkillers I have been on??? Who knows?). Anyway, I have added a retraction of my earlier statement and am now '''strongly opposed''' to the merger. Thank you for pointing out my inexplicable error.  +++$+++ :I have just had a look at my note and, to be honest, I really don't know what I was thinking about at the time - I don't even remember writing it. (It's a real worry! I wonder whether it is due to the onset of senility or all the painkillers I have been on??? Who knows?). Anyway, I have added a retraction of my earlier statement and am now '''strongly opposed''' to the merger. Thank you for pointing out my inexplicable error. [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

484030 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-07 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.199741940E09 +++$+++ He's at it again today. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Baseball_Bugs&diff=182722220&oldid=182721806]  +++$+++ He's at it again today. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Baseball_Bugs&diff=182722220&oldid=182721806] [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 13:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
484031 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484030 +++$+++ 484030 +++$+++ 2008-01-08 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.199787060E09 +++$+++ Check this out. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Jimmy_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=182860780] At least he's not an \"idoit\".  +++$+++ :Check this out. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jimmy_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=182860780] At least he's not an "idoit". [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 02:11, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

20599 +++$+++ Backnumber1662 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-07 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.212899580E09 +++$+++ And while you're at it any more comments on Winston Churchill in politics especially in relation to your comments about changing parties would be much appreciated  +++$+++ And while you're at it any more comments on Winston Churchill in politics especially in relation to your comments about changing parties would be much appreciated [[User:Backnumber1662|Backnumber1662]] ([[User talk:Backnumber1662|talk]]) 21:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
20600 +++$+++ Backnumber1662 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20599 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-08 02:51:00 +++$+++ 1.212918660E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for your comments, I agree with you in part about the Dardenelles, that can be dealt with at some greater length (part of [[Lord Harris]]'s comments. But I think (as I wrote and as the historians who I referenced -specially [[Liddell Hart]] say) if the scheme had been properly planned -and in particular had it been a co ordinated army and navy operation from the start it would have worked. Your edits would be very much appreciated  I would love this to be a featured article  +++$+++ ::Thanks again for your comments, I agree with you in part about the Dardenelles, that can be dealt with at some greater length (part of [[Lord Harris]]'s comments. But I think (as I wrote and as the historians who I referenced -specially [[Liddell Hart]] say) if the scheme had been properly planned -and in particular had it been a co ordinated army and navy operation from the start it would have worked. Your edits would be very much appreciated  I would love this to be a featured article [[User:Backnumber1662|Backnumber1662]] ([[User talk:Backnumber1662|talk]]) 02:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
20601 +++$+++ Backnumber1662 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20599 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-08 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.212983160E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure that we need to deal with the full history of the Gallipoli campaign in the Churchill page, perhaps its sufficient to note that some historians believe that it could have been successful if properly set up and others say it was doomed to failure. The important thing for Churchill is to note that it was a failure and he was blamed- particularly  by the press and the Conservatives, looking for a lever to get political advantage and by some of the Liberals annoyed that he (in their eyes) precipitated the shell crisis. For my own part, if ANZAC and the other forces had been ready in early March or if the whole expedition had been put off till enough troops, aircraft and ships were concentrated I am sure the expedition would have been successful. Churchill had the right idea but he didnt carry it through cabinet properly +++$+++ :: I'm not sure that we need to deal with the full history of the Gallipoli campaign in the Churchill page, perhaps its sufficient to note that some historians believe that it could have been successful if properly set up and others say it was doomed to failure. The important thing for Churchill is to note that it was a failure and he was blamed- particularly  by the press and the Conservatives, looking for a lever to get political advantage and by some of the Liberals annoyed that he (in their eyes) precipitated the shell crisis. For my own part, if ANZAC and the other forces had been ready in early March or if the whole expedition had been put off till enough troops, aircraft and ships were concentrated I am sure the expedition would have been successful. Churchill had the right idea but he didnt carry it through cabinet properly[[User:Backnumber1662|Backnumber1662]] ([[User talk:Backnumber1662|talk]]) 20:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
20602 +++$+++ Backnumber1662 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20599 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-10 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.213100580E09 +++$+++ I'd suggest moving your heading crossing the floor one paragraph down, the Hughligans were Conservatives (certainly not as radical as Chamberlain's Unionists)and Churchill didn't move toward crossing the floor till Chamberlain started his tariff reform movement. +++$+++ :: I'd suggest moving your heading crossing the floor one paragraph down, the Hughligans were Conservatives (certainly not as radical as Chamberlain's Unionists)and Churchill didn't move toward crossing the floor till Chamberlain started his tariff reform movement.[[User:Backnumber1662|Backnumber1662]] ([[User talk:Backnumber1662|talk]]) 05:23, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

282745 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-13 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.260745560E09 +++$+++ You may be interested to know that Nvvchar and I are developing a decent article on Kathmandu, a core article obviously. Your help would be much appreciated in expanding the history\/temples sections at [[User:Nvvchar\/Sandbox 3]]. I am sure you have a wealth of material on Kathmandu's history. particularly ancient! Please add as much as you can! Together may we build the detailed article we should have! +++$+++ You may be interested to know that Nvvchar and I are developing a decent article on Kathmandu, a core article obviously. Your help would be much appreciated in expanding the history/temples sections at [[User:Nvvchar/Sandbox 3]]. I am sure you have a wealth of material on Kathmandu's history. particularly ancient! Please add as much as you can! Together may we build the detailed article we should have![[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 15:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
282746 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282745 +++$+++ 282745 +++$+++ 2009-12-13 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.260773640E09 +++$+++ Congratulations once again! You are incredible! Will try to get to Kathmandu sometimes soon. At the moment I am preparing to go to town to give a talk to the local branch of the Country Women's Association (membership about 10!) on sea silk!!! Take care, my friend,  +++$+++ :Congratulations once again! You are incredible! Will try to get to Kathmandu sometimes soon. At the moment I am preparing to go to town to give a talk to the local branch of the Country Women's Association (membership about 10!) on sea silk!!! Take care, my friend, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

20604 +++$+++ The Land +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20604 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-23 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.214241180E09 +++$+++ The only source I have is Mackay's biography - which is pretty good (better than Massie ;-) ) but far from gospel. I'll see where that places him. On the whole I'm interested in the ships, rather than the men!  +++$+++ The only source I have is Mackay's biography - which is pretty good (better than Massie ;-) ) but far from gospel. I'll see where that places him. On the whole I'm interested in the ships, rather than the men! [[User:The Land|The Land]] ([[User talk:The Land|talk]]) 10:13, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
20605 +++$+++ The Land +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20604 +++$+++ 20604 +++$+++ 2008-06-23 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.214273400E09 +++$+++ Have put some information on the Jackie fisher talk page. I might take a look at the Churchill article.  +++$+++ :Have put some information on the Jackie fisher talk page. I might take a look at the Churchill article. [[User:The Land|The Land]] ([[User talk:The Land|talk]]) 19:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
20606 +++$+++ The Land +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20604 +++$+++ 20605 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.214362920E09 +++$+++ I've also written a bit about the relationship between Fisher and Churchill 1911-14 at: [[Winston_Churchill_in_politics:_1900-1939#First_Lord_of_the_Admiralty]].  +++$+++ ::I've also written a bit about the relationship between Fisher and Churchill 1911-14 at: [[Winston_Churchill_in_politics:_1900-1939#First_Lord_of_the_Admiralty]]. [[User:The Land|The Land]] ([[User talk:The Land|talk]]) 20:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
20607 +++$+++ The Land +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20604 +++$+++ 20606 +++$+++ 2008-06-26 09:10:00 +++$+++ 1.214496600E09 +++$+++ I've never got much into the detail of naval battles - Life's too short to wade through the reams of historiography - so I don't know much about Jutland. The only problem with Massie is that his books are popular history: the narrative is very readable, but by and large his work is a synthesis of other secondary sources (not always well-attributed) and errors creep in.  +++$+++ :::I've never got much into the detail of naval battles - Life's too short to wade through the reams of historiography - so I don't know much about Jutland. The only problem with Massie is that his books are popular history: the narrative is very readable, but by and large his work is a synthesis of other secondary sources (not always well-attributed) and errors creep in. [[User:The Land|The Land]] ([[User talk:The Land|talk]]) 09:10, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

282749 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-18 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.261187160E09 +++$+++ P.S. I can't believe we are missing an article on [[Serxu]] (town) in northern Kham!! +++$+++ P.S. I can't believe we are missing an article on [[Serxu]] (town) in northern Kham!![[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 17:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
282750 +++$+++ Nvvchar +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282749 +++$+++ 282749 +++$+++ 2009-12-19 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.261219140E09 +++$+++ I have merged the time line inputs provided by Dr. Blofeld in the history section. But references need to be fitted. I will add more text on Art section today.-- +++$+++ : I have merged the time line inputs provided by Dr. Blofeld in the history section. But references need to be fitted. I will add more text on Art section today.--[[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]) 02:39, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

544895 +++$+++ Sarcasticidealist +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-05 07:19:00 +++$+++ 1.202224740E09 +++$+++ Could you clarify why you closed this AfD after it was open for less than twenty-four hours?  +++$+++ Could you clarify why you closed this AfD after it was open for less than twenty-four hours? [[User:Sarcasticidealist|Sarcasticidealist]] ([[User talk:Sarcasticidealist|talk]]) 07:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
544896 +++$+++ Sarcasticidealist +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544895 +++$+++ 544895 +++$+++ 2008-02-05 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.202263980E09 +++$+++ My initial reaction was that he probably was notable, since I find that there's usually a fair bit of material available about mayors of cities that size.  Upon a little more digging, however, I'm not sure that he is.  I think mayors of cities that size might be bigger deals in Canada (where I've lived my entire life) than they are in the states, where most of them seem to be part-timers.  I'd still have preferred seeing it go to term - I think it was too early for a [[WP:SNOW]] - but agree that the end result was probably the right one.  No harm done, and thanks for your response.  +++$+++ :My initial reaction was that he probably was notable, since I find that there's usually a fair bit of material available about mayors of cities that size.  Upon a little more digging, however, I'm not sure that he is.  I think mayors of cities that size might be bigger deals in Canada (where I've lived my entire life) than they are in the states, where most of them seem to be part-timers.  I'd still have preferred seeing it go to term - I think it was too early for a [[WP:SNOW]] - but agree that the end result was probably the right one.  No harm done, and thanks for your response. [[User:Sarcasticidealist|Sarcasticidealist]] ([[User talk:Sarcasticidealist|talk]]) 18:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

20608 +++$+++ Harlsbottom +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20608 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-25 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.214462760E09 +++$+++ Of course, German ships ''were'' more closely sub-divided - however using the ''Revenge'' class's three boiler rooms is not a valid way of proving it.  This point on design philosphy with regard to the outcome is irrelevant anyway - no dreadnought battleships were sunk at Jutland, while four battle-cruisers were - using battleships to question the philosophy of a different type of ship isn't logical.  --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] |  +++$+++ Of course, German ships ''were'' more closely sub-divided - however using the ''Revenge'' class's three boiler rooms is not a valid way of proving it.  This point on design philosphy with regard to the outcome is irrelevant anyway - no dreadnought battleships were sunk at Jutland, while four battle-cruisers were - using battleships to question the philosophy of a different type of ship isn't logical.  --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] | [[User:Harlsbottom/Library|library]]) 23:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
20609 +++$+++ Harlsbottom +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20608 +++$+++ 20608 +++$+++ 2008-06-26 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.214465040E09 +++$+++ Yes, Fisher's Committee on Designs drew up the specifications for HMS ''Dreadnought'' and the ''Invincible'' class battle cruiser.  However, they were based on two entirely different philosophies of both utilisation and design, the latter governing the former - the only major similarity being the all-big-gun main armament.  I will have a look at my copy of Massie in the morning, but if he did try and use the ''Bayern'' and the ''Royal Sovereign'' as typical examples then he is quite frankly wrong, and most technical studies of German and British battleships will tell you that.  Massie may well cite it as a fair example, but one can not blindly assume Massie is right, especially when, to be blunt, the old fool didn't bother informing the reader what information he used to cite his conclusions.  Suffice it to say Wikipedia is more scholarly than that.  The one technical study I did note in ''Castles of Steel's'' bibliography was Breyer's ''Battleships and Battlecruisers'' book which he ''may'' have used to support his argument.  This 30-year old book is rife with errors and also has a subtle German bias. --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] |  +++$+++ :Yes, Fisher's Committee on Designs drew up the specifications for HMS ''Dreadnought'' and the ''Invincible'' class battle cruiser.  However, they were based on two entirely different philosophies of both utilisation and design, the latter governing the former - the only major similarity being the all-big-gun main armament.  I will have a look at my copy of Massie in the morning, but if he did try and use the ''Bayern'' and the ''Royal Sovereign'' as typical examples then he is quite frankly wrong, and most technical studies of German and British battleships will tell you that.  Massie may well cite it as a fair example, but one can not blindly assume Massie is right, especially when, to be blunt, the old fool didn't bother informing the reader what information he used to cite his conclusions.  Suffice it to say Wikipedia is more scholarly than that.  The one technical study I did note in ''Castles of Steel's'' bibliography was Breyer's ''Battleships and Battlecruisers'' book which he ''may'' have used to support his argument.  This 30-year old book is rife with errors and also has a subtle German bias. --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] | [[User:Harlsbottom/Library|library]]) 00:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
20610 +++$+++ Harlsbottom +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20608 +++$+++ 20609 +++$+++ 2008-06-26 10:01:00 +++$+++ 1.214499660E09 +++$+++ For example, if you were wanting to write about the Norwegian convoys Massie alludes to on p. 753, you would probably look at that page then write something like, \"the four ''Superb'' class battleships were detached for convoy duty to Norway\", then cite Massie.  However, contrary to his book, there is no such thing as the ''Superb'' class.  The ''Superb'' was a member of the ''Bellerophon'' class which numbered three ships.  On occasion the ''Dreadnought'' was categorised as a ''Superb'' class ship but from 1916-1918 she was definitely on duty with the Third Battle Squadron on the Coast of England.  And because Massie doesn't cite such details the discerning reader (i.e. me) has no idea where he got such a stupid idea from. --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] |  +++$+++ ::For example, if you were wanting to write about the Norwegian convoys Massie alludes to on p. 753, you would probably look at that page then write something like, "the four ''Superb'' class battleships were detached for convoy duty to Norway", then cite Massie.  However, contrary to his book, there is no such thing as the ''Superb'' class.  The ''Superb'' was a member of the ''Bellerophon'' class which numbered three ships.  On occasion the ''Dreadnought'' was categorised as a ''Superb'' class ship but from 1916-1918 she was definitely on duty with the Third Battle Squadron on the Coast of England.  And because Massie doesn't cite such details the discerning reader (i.e. me) has no idea where he got such a stupid idea from. --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] | [[User:Harlsbottom/Library|library]]) 10:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
20611 +++$+++ Harlsbottom +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20608 +++$+++ 20608 +++$+++ 2008-06-26 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.214519400E09 +++$+++ Over simplification without accuracy is pointless and defeats the purpose of making it easier to understand in the first place.  You and I aren't writing a book meant to basically educate thousands of people on the naval history of World War One.  The point re:''Superb'' is meant to illustrate that he's confusing very different ships together, which goes back to the original comparison of ''Bayern'' and ''Royal Sovereign''.  --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] |  +++$+++ :Over simplification without accuracy is pointless and defeats the purpose of making it easier to understand in the first place.  You and I aren't writing a book meant to basically educate thousands of people on the naval history of World War One.  The point re:''Superb'' is meant to illustrate that he's confusing very different ships together, which goes back to the original comparison of ''Bayern'' and ''Royal Sovereign''.  --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] | [[User:Harlsbottom/Library|library]]) 15:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
20612 +++$+++ The Land +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20608 +++$+++ 20610 +++$+++ 2008-06-26 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.214520780E09 +++$+++ Regards,  +++$+++ :::Regards, [[User:The Land|The Land]] ([[User talk:The Land|talk]]) 15:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
20613 +++$+++ Harlsbottom +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20608 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-06-26 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.214528580E09 +++$+++ Out of interest, I infer from some of your comments that you haven't read ''Castles of Steel'' completely yet?  Is that a fair inference?  I have read the entire book through including the notes, hence what I will admit are disparaging comments about the book.  Re: your comments on the number of notes, I can only reiterate, it doesn't matter how many he has made unless they're comprehensive.  You defend his style of writing and referencing, while I as an aspiring historian can only deplore and condemn it.  In the acknowledgements he wrote that he had spent on ''Dreadnought'' and ''Castles of Steel'' twenty-two years of labour and research.  You must surely agree that he could at least have been thorough in completing the book? -[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] |  +++$+++ :::::Out of interest, I infer from some of your comments that you haven't read ''Castles of Steel'' completely yet?  Is that a fair inference?  I have read the entire book through including the notes, hence what I will admit are disparaging comments about the book.  Re: your comments on the number of notes, I can only reiterate, it doesn't matter how many he has made unless they're comprehensive.  You defend his style of writing and referencing, while I as an aspiring historian can only deplore and condemn it.  In the acknowledgements he wrote that he had spent on ''Dreadnought'' and ''Castles of Steel'' twenty-two years of labour and research.  You must surely agree that he could at least have been thorough in completing the book? -[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] | [[User:Harlsbottom/Library|library]]) 18:03, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

282757 +++$+++ Guettarda +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282757 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-10 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.263169560E09 +++$+++ I never thanked for your condolence note last year, but I appreciate it more than I can possibly express.  All the best, in friendship.   +++$+++ I never thanked for your condolence note last year, but I appreciate it more than I can possibly express.  All the best, in friendship.  [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 16:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
282758 +++$+++ Guettarda +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282757 +++$+++ 282757 +++$+++ 2010-01-10 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.263169560E09 +++$+++ And thanks very much for your recent note.   +++$+++ :And thanks very much for your recent note.  [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 16:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

20615 +++$+++ Harlsbottom +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20615 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-27 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.214611080E09 +++$+++ as it is totally incorrect and I can provide a dozen sources to prove it's wrong.  [[Oxford Dictionary of National Biography]] articles are often used in biography articles, though sparingly, as in a number of cases they have been proven to be spectacularly misinformed and rife with error. --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] |  +++$+++ as it is totally incorrect and I can provide a dozen sources to prove it's wrong.  [[Oxford Dictionary of National Biography]] articles are often used in biography articles, though sparingly, as in a number of cases they have been proven to be spectacularly misinformed and rife with error. --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] | [[User:Harlsbottom/Library|library]]) 16:58, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
20616 +++$+++ Harlsbottom +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20615 +++$+++ 20615 +++$+++ 2008-06-27 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.214614740E09 +++$+++ As to the plans, they're simplified to show the internal subdivisions, and engine rooms and boiler rooms are clearly marked.  There appears to be but two compartments separating the turbines. and no divisions between each turbine, making for two enginerooms.  Yet another point which hasn't been mentioned is that ''Ramillies'' of the ''Revenge'' class was the first dreadnought battleship to be bulged, and their underwater vertical protection was superior to any other class of British battleship, another point towards the ''Revenge'' class not being indicative of British design philosophy and also renders any comparison with ''Bayern'' on internal sub-division pointless as the watertight-compartments would not be flooded thanks to the bulge (tested in 1917 by German attacks on the bulged monitors ''Terror'' and ''Erebus''. --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] |  +++$+++ :As to the plans, they're simplified to show the internal subdivisions, and engine rooms and boiler rooms are clearly marked.  There appears to be but two compartments separating the turbines. and no divisions between each turbine, making for two enginerooms.  Yet another point which hasn't been mentioned is that ''Ramillies'' of the ''Revenge'' class was the first dreadnought battleship to be bulged, and their underwater vertical protection was superior to any other class of British battleship, another point towards the ''Revenge'' class not being indicative of British design philosophy and also renders any comparison with ''Bayern'' on internal sub-division pointless as the watertight-compartments would not be flooded thanks to the bulge (tested in 1917 by German attacks on the bulged monitors ''Terror'' and ''Erebus''. --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] | [[User:Harlsbottom/Library|library]]) 17:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
20617 +++$+++ Harlsbottom +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20615 +++$+++ 20616 +++$+++ 2008-06-28 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.214668560E09 +++$+++ I have done some more research through my books and files, which presents something of a different picture.  I'm not ignoring this discussion, but I've got many other things on my plate plus I'm writing up a proper ''Bayern''-''Royal Sovereign'' comparison. -- +++$+++ ::I have done some more research through my books and files, which presents something of a different picture.  I'm not ignoring this discussion, but I've got many other things on my plate plus I'm writing up a proper ''Bayern''-''Royal Sovereign'' comparison. --[[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]]) 08:56, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
20618 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20615 +++$+++ 20617 +++$+++ 2008-07-07 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.215458280E09 +++$+++ With regards to the Dreadnought photo, while I cannot recognise the pre-dreadnought in question, I have asked around and hopefully someone will have an answer. [[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] |  +++$+++ :::With regards to the Dreadnought photo, while I cannot recognise the pre-dreadnought in question, I have asked around and hopefully someone will have an answer. [[User:Harlsbottom|Harlsbottom]] ([[User talk:Harlsbottom|talk]] | [[User:Harlsbottom/Library|library]]) [[Image:Naval Ensign of the United Kingdom.svg|God's Own Navy|20px]] 12:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

571415 +++$+++ SuggestBot +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571415 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-26 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.169856360E09 +++$+++ P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on [[User:SuggestBot\/Requests|the SuggestBot request page]].  If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --  +++$+++ P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on [[User:SuggestBot/Requests|the SuggestBot request page]].  If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] 16:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
571416 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571415 +++$+++ 571415 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.169881020E09 +++$+++ What the? [[Fart]]? [[Fart]]?! I have never and have no interest in ant of these subjects. Except [[The Anarchist Cookbook]]. I can do that. Thanks, <font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"5\"> +++$+++ :What the? [[Fart]]? [[Fart]]?! I have never and have no interest in ant of these subjects. Except [[The Anarchist Cookbook]]. I can do that. Thanks, <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="5">[[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] </sup>   </font> 22:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

20621 +++$+++ MBK004 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-09 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.215649500E09 +++$+++ \"No useful information\". - Well, let me see, since I usually stick with US Navy ships, the hull numbers provide lots of information: e.g. {{USS|Texas}} has had many incarnations of different types of vessels and each hull number at a glance can tell you which type of vessel each one was, i.e. battleship, cruiser, submarine, etc. (Also, some of the RN's pennant numbers can do the same, hence look at the WWII-present aircraft carriers of Britain and the Commonwealth of Nations). Finally, let's keep this on the naming conventions talk page. -''' +++$+++ "No useful information". - Well, let me see, since I usually stick with US Navy ships, the hull numbers provide lots of information: e.g. {{USS|Texas}} has had many incarnations of different types of vessels and each hull number at a glance can tell you which type of vessel each one was, i.e. battleship, cruiser, submarine, etc. (Also, some of the RN's pennant numbers can do the same, hence look at the WWII-present aircraft carriers of Britain and the Commonwealth of Nations). Finally, let's keep this on the naming conventions talk page. -'''[[User:MBK004|MBK]]'''<sub>[[User talk:MBK004|004]]</sub> 17:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
20622 +++$+++ MBK004 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20621 +++$+++ 20621 +++$+++ 2008-07-09 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.215659700E09 +++$+++ It's part of the 2008 discussion and does not need a brand new level 2 heading. That is misleading since the archives are by level 2 headings, leaving it your way could lead to an incomplete archival in the future. -''' +++$+++ :It's part of the 2008 discussion and does not need a brand new level 2 heading. That is misleading since the archives are by level 2 headings, leaving it your way could lead to an incomplete archival in the future. -'''[[User:MBK004|MBK]]'''<sub>[[User talk:MBK004|004]]</sub> 20:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
20623 +++$+++ MBK004 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20621 +++$+++ 20622 +++$+++ 2008-07-09 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.215659820E09 +++$+++ Good you saw that mistake. -''' +++$+++ ::Good you saw that mistake. -'''[[User:MBK004|MBK]]'''<sub>[[User talk:MBK004|004]]</sub> 20:17, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
20624 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20621 +++$+++ 20623 +++$+++ 2008-07-09 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.215660060E09 +++$+++ I see many. But I am not responsible for whatever way your archives may work. tail wagging dog?   +++$+++ :::I see many. But I am not responsible for whatever way your archives may work. tail wagging dog?  [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] ([[User talk:Sandpiper#top|talk]]) 20:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

282766 +++$+++ Marylanderz +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282766 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-20 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.266713400E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Song Yun]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Song Yun|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible.  Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Song Yun]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Song Yun|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible.  Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Marylanderz|Marylanderz]] ([[User talk:Marylanderz|talk]]) 16:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
282767 +++$+++ Marylanderz +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282766 +++$+++ 282766 +++$+++ 2010-02-23 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.266953280E09 +++$+++ Don't panic. Another editor followed up, and the article is in the DYK queue, which is why you don't see it on the suggestions page. It should appear sometime tomorrow.  +++$+++ :Don't panic. Another editor followed up, and the article is in the DYK queue, which is why you don't see it on the suggestions page. It should appear sometime tomorrow. [[User:Marylanderz|Marylanderz]] ([[User talk:Marylanderz|talk]]) 11:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
282768 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282766 +++$+++ 282767 +++$+++ 2010-02-23 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.266994980E09 +++$+++ Oh, fabulous, I am really grateful for all the help and support. +++$+++ ::Oh, fabulous, I am really grateful for all the help and support.[[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 23:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

20625 +++$+++ Kralizec! +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-09 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.215661680E09 +++$+++ While I understand your frustration with the debate at [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (ships)]], that is no excuse for comparing those with whom you disagree to a third-world dictator.  Please comment on content rather than your fellow contributors.  -- +++$+++ While I understand your frustration with the debate at [[Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (ships)]], that is no excuse for comparing those with whom you disagree to a third-world dictator.  Please comment on content rather than your fellow contributors.  --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 20:48, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
20626 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20625 +++$+++ 20625 +++$+++ 2008-07-09 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.215662460E09 +++$+++ I'm not quite sure what you are complaining about, or who you feel has been accused of being a dictator. Perhaps you could explain.  +++$+++ :I'm not quite sure what you are complaining about, or who you feel has been accused of being a dictator. Perhaps you could explain. [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] ([[User talk:Sandpiper|talk]]) 21:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

282774 +++$+++ Himalayan Explorer +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-03 11:23:00 +++$+++ 1.267644180E09 +++$+++ Excellent work!. I've uploaded some more pics to pretty it up a bit. Isn't Yarlung Valley within [[Nedong County]]? Perhaps you could duplicate some of the info there... +++$+++ Excellent work!. I've uploaded some more pics to pretty it up a bit. Isn't Yarlung Valley within [[Nedong County]]? Perhaps you could duplicate some of the info there...[[User:Himalayan Explorer| <span style="border:2px solid #C5B358 ;padding:0px;"><font size="2"> <font style="color:white;background:#B00760;">'''''‡ Himalayan ‡'''''</font>]]</span><sup>[[User talk:Himalayan Explorer| <font size="-4"><font color="#C5B358">Ψ''Monastery''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 11:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
282775 +++$+++ Nvvchar +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282774 +++$+++ 282774 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.267989960E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for the warm greetings.-- +++$+++ : Thank you very much for the warm greetings.--[[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]) 11:26, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
282776 +++$+++ Nvvchar +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282774 +++$+++ 282774 +++$+++ 2010-03-07 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.267990380E09 +++$+++ By the way , please feel free to ask me for any collaborative work, when you get well. I will bbe glad to work on any joint article related to Buddhism and its monasteries (I am a Hindu by birth but Buddhist at heart).  By the way, is this reference [http:\/\/books.google.co.in\/books?id=DDLAqIckCHkC&pg=PA240&dq=Jokpo+Hermitage&cd=2#v=onepage&q=Jokpo%20Hermitage&f=false] the same as [[Jakpo Hermitage]] near Lhasa?-- +++$+++ : By the way , please feel free to ask me for any collaborative work, when you get well. I will bbe glad to work on any joint article related to Buddhism and its monasteries (I am a Hindu by birth but Buddhist at heart).  By the way, is this reference [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=DDLAqIckCHkC&pg=PA240&dq=Jokpo+Hermitage&cd=2#v=onepage&q=Jokpo%20Hermitage&f=false] the same as [[Jakpo Hermitage]] near Lhasa?--[[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]) 11:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

571417 +++$+++ TRSJ +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571417 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-26 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.169871960E09 +++$+++ Even though it's not Australia Day anymore in Australia, it still is here. Even though I don't have a trace of Australian (or Aussie?) blood, I can still celebrate it, right? Anyway, thanks for signing my book. Regards, <span style=\"background:Black\">[[User:TRSJ|<font color=\"White\">&nbsp;&nbsp;'''\u2022The RSJ\u2022'''&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/font>]] <small>[[User talk:TRSJ|<font color=\"white\">Talk<\/font>]] |  +++$+++ Even though it's not Australia Day anymore in Australia, it still is here. Even though I don't have a trace of Australian (or Aussie?) blood, I can still celebrate it, right? Anyway, thanks for signing my book. Regards, <span style="background:Black">[[User:TRSJ|<font color="White">&nbsp;&nbsp;'''•The RSJ•'''&nbsp;&nbsp;</font>]] <small>[[User talk:TRSJ|<font color="white">Talk</font>]] | [[User:TRSJ/AB|<font color="white">Sign Here</font>]]</small></span> 20:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
571418 +++$+++ TRSJ +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571417 +++$+++ 571417 +++$+++ 2007-01-27 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.169898420E09 +++$+++ What should I bring to the party? Fish \u2018n\u2019 chips? No, that's stereotypical to the English. Ah well, I'll bring some Bosnian ''[[burek]]''. Cheers - <span style=\"background:Black\">[[User:TRSJ|<font color=\"White\">&nbsp;&nbsp;'''\u2022The RSJ\u2022'''&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/font>]] <small>[[User talk:TRSJ|<font color=\"white\">Talk<\/font>]] |  +++$+++ :What should I bring to the party? Fish ‘n’ chips? No, that's stereotypical to the English. Ah well, I'll bring some Bosnian ''[[burek]]''. Cheers - <span style="background:Black">[[User:TRSJ|<font color="White">&nbsp;&nbsp;'''•The RSJ•'''&nbsp;&nbsp;</font>]] <small>[[User talk:TRSJ|<font color="white">Talk</font>]] | [[User:TRSJ/AB|<font color="white">Sign Here</font>]]</small></span> 03:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

20632 +++$+++ Dashiellx +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-23 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.222214460E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Dashiellx|dashiellx]] ([[User talk:Dashiellx|talk]]) 17:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
20633 +++$+++ Dashiellx +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20632 +++$+++ 20632 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.222279140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding your notes to the Talk page.  Once I actually have some time, I hope to be able to make many of the improvements you recommend.  Also, thanks for doing a copy edit on the article.  -- +++$+++ :Thanks for adding your notes to the Talk page.  Once I actually have some time, I hope to be able to make many of the improvements you recommend.  Also, thanks for doing a copy edit on the article.  --[[User:Dashiellx|dashiellx]] ([[User talk:Dashiellx|talk]]) 10:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

282777 +++$+++ A. Parrot +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-01 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.267444260E09 +++$+++ I'm confused by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tang_Dynasty&diff=344341066&oldid=344339895 this edit] to [[Tang Dynasty]]. The two paragraphs you moved were part of the article's lead; they summarize material that's already covered in more depth in the sections below. That's exactly what lead sections are supposed to do, according to [[WP:LEAD]], but as a section within the body of the article they're rather redundant. Besides, according to the same guideline, the lead section for an article this size is supposed to be three or four paragraphs.  +++$+++ I'm confused by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tang_Dynasty&diff=344341066&oldid=344339895 this edit] to [[Tang Dynasty]]. The two paragraphs you moved were part of the article's lead; they summarize material that's already covered in more depth in the sections below. That's exactly what lead sections are supposed to do, according to [[WP:LEAD]], but as a section within the body of the article they're rather redundant. Besides, according to the same guideline, the lead section for an article this size is supposed to be three or four paragraphs. [[User:A. Parrot|A. Parrot]] ([[User talk:A. Parrot|talk]]) 03:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
282778 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282777 +++$+++ 282777 +++$+++ 2010-03-01 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.267472880E09 +++$+++ Hi! I didn't really move or change anything - I just inserted a header. It seemed to me that the lead was too long and detailed (discussing such things as air-conditioning fans, standardized examinations, the names of a number of famous poets, painters, etc., etc.) Looking at it again now I think I should have just shortened these two very long paragraphs and left such detailed subjects to be dealt with (as they are - very well, it seems to me) further on in the article? As I understand it, the lead is supposed to summarize the main points of the article providing a brief overview - not to duplicate details to be repeated further on in the article. Perhaps the guidelines should specify the lead should be made up of 3 to 4 short to medium paragraphs? Anyway, I certainly don't want to get into an argument about it. Do you think you (or we?) could shorten the lead somewhat along the lines I have mentioned and remove the heading I inserted (which, on second thought, is not very appropriate)? I welcome any comments you may have on the subject. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Hi! I didn't really move or change anything - I just inserted a header. It seemed to me that the lead was too long and detailed (discussing such things as air-conditioning fans, standardized examinations, the names of a number of famous poets, painters, etc., etc.) Looking at it again now I think I should have just shortened these two very long paragraphs and left such detailed subjects to be dealt with (as they are - very well, it seems to me) further on in the article? As I understand it, the lead is supposed to summarize the main points of the article providing a brief overview - not to duplicate details to be repeated further on in the article. Perhaps the guidelines should specify the lead should be made up of 3 to 4 short to medium paragraphs? Anyway, I certainly don't want to get into an argument about it. Do you think you (or we?) could shorten the lead somewhat along the lines I have mentioned and remove the heading I inserted (which, on second thought, is not very appropriate)? I welcome any comments you may have on the subject. Sincerely, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 11:48, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
282779 +++$+++ A. Parrot +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282777 +++$+++ 282778 +++$+++ 2010-03-01 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.267505640E09 +++$+++ The paragraphs are pretty thick, but in the lead they look longer than they are because of the dynasty infobox squashing them against the left margin (and where you put them they're still squashed some by the History of China template). A little trimming would make sense, but I'm not an expert on China and therefore tend to be cautious. For instance, the poets are listed mainly as examples of the flourishing literature of the period, but to an uninitiated Westerner their names won't mean anything. [[User:PericlesofAthens]], though, said that \"Du Fu, in terms of renown and lyrical excellence, is China's Shakespeare\". If that's so, you certainly wouldn't want to leave him out. The technological examples could be removed, but I do understand the desire to list Tang-era contributions to the long list of things the Chinese invented before Westerners even imagined them. The standardized examinations were an extremely important part of the governing structure in imperial China, and I wouldn't leave them out. The one thing I feel entirely comfortable removing is the statement that the Grand Canal \"is to this day the longest in the world\", as the canal's construction was an achievement of the Sui Dynasty and not the Tang. I'm about to do that, but if you want to trim some more, I won't object. Like I said, it's not my area of expertise.  +++$+++ ::The paragraphs are pretty thick, but in the lead they look longer than they are because of the dynasty infobox squashing them against the left margin (and where you put them they're still squashed some by the History of China template). A little trimming would make sense, but I'm not an expert on China and therefore tend to be cautious. For instance, the poets are listed mainly as examples of the flourishing literature of the period, but to an uninitiated Westerner their names won't mean anything. [[User:PericlesofAthens]], though, said that "Du Fu, in terms of renown and lyrical excellence, is China's Shakespeare". If that's so, you certainly wouldn't want to leave him out. The technological examples could be removed, but I do understand the desire to list Tang-era contributions to the long list of things the Chinese invented before Westerners even imagined them. The standardized examinations were an extremely important part of the governing structure in imperial China, and I wouldn't leave them out. The one thing I feel entirely comfortable removing is the statement that the Grand Canal "is to this day the longest in the world", as the canal's construction was an achievement of the Sui Dynasty and not the Tang. I'm about to do that, but if you want to trim some more, I won't object. Like I said, it's not my area of expertise. [[User:A. Parrot|A. Parrot]] ([[User talk:A. Parrot|talk]]) 20:54, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
282780 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282777 +++$+++ 282779 +++$+++ 2010-03-01 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.267506480E09 +++$+++ Hi all. I will trim the lead as necessary, but not at the moment. I have to run out the door! I restored those paragraphs to the lead for now.--<strong> +++$+++ :::Hi all. I will trim the lead as necessary, but not at the moment. I have to run out the door! I restored those paragraphs to the lead for now.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 21:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
282781 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282777 +++$+++ 282780 +++$+++ 2010-03-01 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.267508280E09 +++$+++ As promised, I pruned about 500 bytes of text from the introduction. I hope everyone approves of what I chose to excise from the introduction. Cheers.--<strong> +++$+++ ::::As promised, I pruned about 500 bytes of text from the introduction. I hope everyone approves of what I chose to excise from the introduction. Cheers.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 21:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
282782 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282777 +++$+++ 282777 +++$+++ 2010-03-02 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.267518120E09 +++$+++ Hi again! Thank you, Pericles of Athens, for your work which I think really improved the opening paragraphs. I have just done a little more tightening up which I hope will meet your approval and that of A. Parrot. Please feel free, though, to make any adjustments you think will improve things further. Thank you both for your contributions and civility. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Hi again! Thank you, Pericles of Athens, for your work which I think really improved the opening paragraphs. I have just done a little more tightening up which I hope will meet your approval and that of A. Parrot. Please feel free, though, to make any adjustments you think will improve things further. Thank you both for your contributions and civility. Sincerely, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 00:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
282783 +++$+++ A. Parrot +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282777 +++$+++ 282782 +++$+++ 2010-03-02 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.267524960E09 +++$+++ Looks good.  +++$+++ ::Looks good. [[User:A. Parrot|A. Parrot]] ([[User talk:A. Parrot|talk]]) 02:16, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
282784 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282777 +++$+++ 282777 +++$+++ 2010-03-02 02:25:00 +++$+++ 1.267525500E09 +++$+++ Fabulous! I am so pleased you are happy with it.  +++$+++ :Fabulous! I am so pleased you are happy with it. [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 02:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
282785 +++$+++ PericlesofAthens +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282777 +++$+++ 282784 +++$+++ 2010-03-02 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.267526280E09 +++$+++ I concur; the introduction sounds much tighter and more succinct.--<strong> +++$+++ ::I concur; the introduction sounds much tighter and more succinct.--<strong>[[User:PericlesofAthens|<font color="blue">Pericles of Athens</font>]]</strong><sup>[[User talk:PericlesofAthens|<font color="#0000CD">Talk</font>]]</sup> 02:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

544928 +++$+++ Bartleby +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-12 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.202813100E09 +++$+++ Hi.  You deleted [[Ron Paul\/Newsletters sandbox]] as a test page.  It was actually a proposal for the article being discussed in talk.  +++$+++ Hi.  You deleted [[Ron Paul/Newsletters sandbox]] as a test page.  It was actually a proposal for the article being discussed in talk. [[User:Bartleby|Bartleby]] ([[User talk:Bartleby|talk]]) 02:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
544929 +++$+++ Bartleby +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544928 +++$+++ 544928 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.202813580E09 +++$+++ Looking at what happened it seems someone moved and emptied the page before the deletion.  I didn't realize that had happened - sorry for the trouble.  +++$+++ :Looking at what happened it seems someone moved and emptied the page before the deletion.  I didn't realize that had happened - sorry for the trouble. [[User:Bartleby|Bartleby]] ([[User talk:Bartleby|talk]]) 02:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
544930 +++$+++ John J. Bulten +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544928 +++$+++ 544929 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 17:11:00 +++$+++ 1.202865060E09 +++$+++ Moved to proper location for tests: [[User:Bartleby\/Newsletters sandbox]]. [[User:John J. Bulten|John J. Bulten]] ( +++$+++ ::Moved to proper location for tests: [[User:Bartleby/Newsletters sandbox]]. [[User:John J. Bulten|John J. Bulten]] ([[User:John J. Bulten/Friends|talk]]) 17:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

20642 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-18 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.227015720E09 +++$+++ You've said \"alteration of fundamental wiki policies, which continue to state that referencing is only required for contentious points.\" Since I've had unsourced material removed [[Custom car|here]], citing policy, & defense of even more radical removal on the talk page there (quoting a statement to the effect \"delete with extreme prejudice\"), I'd be interested to know where I find what the policy '''actually says'''. Thanks.   +++$+++ You've said "alteration of fundamental wiki policies, which continue to state that referencing is only required for contentious points." Since I've had unsourced material removed [[Custom car|here]], citing policy, & defense of even more radical removal on the talk page there (quoting a statement to the effect "delete with extreme prejudice"), I'd be interested to know where I find what the policy '''actually says'''. Thanks.  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>hit me ♠</small> </sup>]]</font> 05:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
20643 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20642 +++$+++ 20642 +++$+++ 2008-11-18 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.227072120E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help. I have a suspicion of bad faith in re custom car (maybe I'm biased, I admit), 'cause AFAICT, there was no hazard of any of it being challenged, except by the guy taking it out (who refused persistently to defend the removal of the pix, as the talk page showed). Any suggestions on what to do?   +++$+++ :Thanks for the help. I have a suspicion of bad faith in re custom car (maybe I'm biased, I admit), 'cause AFAICT, there was no hazard of any of it being challenged, except by the guy taking it out (who refused persistently to defend the removal of the pix, as the talk page showed). Any suggestions on what to do?  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>hit me ♠</small> </sup>]]</font> 21:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
20644 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20642 +++$+++ 20643 +++$+++ 2008-11-18 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.227079680E09 +++$+++ On content, I can see the point wanting sources, so I wasn't (very...) peeved about that. What really burned me was a claim of \"redundant\" (& a supporting \"3d opinion\"), without any reason I could see. I'm more\/less in agreement with you on inclusion. [[User:Trekphiler\/Custom glossary|This]] would be my preference, rather than [[Custom car|this]], & I don't think there are \"too many\" pix (tho maybe the [[Volkswagen Beetle|Type 1]] & the DeSoto grille could go). As it is... And I don't have a good record getting support here for my views; I end up with insults & opposition... I begin to think it's a losing proposition to even ask. Ah, well. Thanks for letting me vent a little. ;D   +++$+++ ::On content, I can see the point wanting sources, so I wasn't (very...) peeved about that. What really burned me was a claim of "redundant" (& a supporting "3d opinion"), without any reason I could see. I'm more/less in agreement with you on inclusion. [[User:Trekphiler/Custom glossary|This]] would be my preference, rather than [[Custom car|this]], & I don't think there are "too many" pix (tho maybe the [[Volkswagen Beetle|Type 1]] & the DeSoto grille could go). As it is... And I don't have a good record getting support here for my views; I end up with insults & opposition... I begin to think it's a losing proposition to even ask. Ah, well. Thanks for letting me vent a little. ;D  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>hit me ♠</small> </sup>]]</font> 23:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
20645 +++$+++ Trekphiler +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20642 +++$+++ 20644 +++$+++ 2008-12-12 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.229074500E09 +++$+++ Just came across [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Custom_car this]. Thanks (if a bit belated).   +++$+++ :::Just came across [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Custom_car this]. Thanks (if a bit belated).  [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>hit me ♠</small> </sup>]]</font> 01:35, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

544931 +++$+++ Enigmaman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544931 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-12 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.202867760E09 +++$+++ It makes no difference, but there's one neutral for RTD's RfA. I guess it isn't getting counted because all the strikes messed up the numbering for whatever counts it.  +++$+++ It makes no difference, but there's one neutral for RTD's RfA. I guess it isn't getting counted because all the strikes messed up the numbering for whatever counts it. [[User:Enigmaman|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigmaman|talk]]) 17:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
544932 +++$+++ Enigmaman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544931 +++$+++ 544931 +++$+++ 2008-02-12 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.202889540E09 +++$+++ The bot is still not recognizing the neutral, but whatever. Makes no difference to anything. By the way, could you fix something? On [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion], by step III, the \"r\" in \"monitor\" is off.  +++$+++ :The bot is still not recognizing the neutral, but whatever. Makes no difference to anything. By the way, could you fix something? On [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion], by step III, the "r" in "monitor" is off. [[User:Enigmaman|Enigma]] ([[User talk:Enigmaman|talk]]) 23:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

282791 +++$+++ Himalayan Explorer +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282791 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-14 14:26:00 +++$+++ 1.268601960E09 +++$+++ Nice work! I've nominated them as a double hook. +++$+++ Nice work! I've nominated them as a double hook.[[User:Himalayan Explorer| <span style="border:2px solid #C5B358 ;padding:0px;"><font size="2"> <font style="color:white;background:#B00760;">'''''‡ Himalayan ‡'''''</font>]]</span><sup>[[User talk:Himalayan Explorer| <font size="-4"><font color="#C5B358">Ψ''Monastery''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 14:26, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
282792 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282791 +++$+++ 282791 +++$+++ 2010-03-14 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.268632980E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for the complement and the nomination! Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks so much for the complement and the nomination! Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 23:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

20649 +++$+++ Skinny87 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20649 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-10 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.236730620E09 +++$+++ I don't personally see anything wrong with the current grading system; it's not perfect at the bottom end of the scale, but the implementation of C-Class might be an improvement and help people. I certainly don't think GA should be scrapped, although I wonder if making the Second Opinion option as compulsory might make things even better.  +++$+++ I don't personally see anything wrong with the current grading system; it's not perfect at the bottom end of the scale, but the implementation of C-Class might be an improvement and help people. I certainly don't think GA should be scrapped, although I wonder if making the Second Opinion option as compulsory might make things even better. [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
20650 +++$+++ Skinny87 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20649 +++$+++ 20649 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.236731700E09 +++$+++ I imagine comparing the GA and A-Class requirements would tell you that; I'm afraid my time is rather limited at the moment and I'm not able to tell you that m'self. But I still think that if we had half-a-dozen new rankings for lower-ranking articles (B and below), most of the MILHIST articles would be just as bad. MILHIST and wiki are voluntary, and there are too few volunteers and too many articles that need writing\/expanding; add to that the difficulties of expanding major articles because of i.p. editors\/POV & nationalism problems and plain old trolls, and you can see that it's not the grading system that's at fault. It's the fact that wikipedia is a hobby site, essentially, and people do what they want.  +++$+++ :I imagine comparing the GA and A-Class requirements would tell you that; I'm afraid my time is rather limited at the moment and I'm not able to tell you that m'self. But I still think that if we had half-a-dozen new rankings for lower-ranking articles (B and below), most of the MILHIST articles would be just as bad. MILHIST and wiki are voluntary, and there are too few volunteers and too many articles that need writing/expanding; add to that the difficulties of expanding major articles because of i.p. editors/POV & nationalism problems and plain old trolls, and you can see that it's not the grading system that's at fault. It's the fact that wikipedia is a hobby site, essentially, and people do what they want. [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 17:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
20651 +++$+++ Skinny87 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20649 +++$+++ 20650 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.236737100E09 +++$+++ You've obviously put a lot of thought into this, Sandpiper, but I don't think I'm the right person to talk to. This needs to go to the current Coordinators - I'd suggest posting on their talkpage and asking this.  +++$+++ ::You've obviously put a lot of thought into this, Sandpiper, but I don't think I'm the right person to talk to. This needs to go to the current Coordinators - I'd suggest posting on their talkpage and asking this. [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 19:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

544938 +++$+++ Yupik +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.202975160E09 +++$+++ The intro has been edited and is now fine, but I really can't believe I've been an ex-pat so long that for example, the following sentence is actually correct in English: ''Regular Kolumen write currently Munich Mayor Christian Ude, moderator Juergen fly, health expert Hademar bank Hofer, comedian Django As\xfcl and film critic Ponkie. Daily appears in the local section of the newspaper a drawing of Franziska Bilek.'' After the intro, the rest of it is a machine translation. - +++$+++ The intro has been edited and is now fine, but I really can't believe I've been an ex-pat so long that for example, the following sentence is actually correct in English: ''Regular Kolumen write currently Munich Mayor Christian Ude, moderator Juergen fly, health expert Hademar bank Hofer, comedian Django Asül and film critic Ponkie. Daily appears in the local section of the newspaper a drawing of Franziska Bilek.'' After the intro, the rest of it is a machine translation. -[[User:Yupik|Yupik]] ([[User talk:Yupik|talk]]) 23:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
544939 +++$+++ Yupik +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544938 +++$+++ 544938 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.202975700E09 +++$+++ I'd recommend it be stubbified and then put up for translation at [[WP:TRANSLATION]]. BTW, if you're at all interested, we could always use more of your help at [[WP:PNT]], as we have a serious backlog of articles there. - +++$+++ :I'd recommend it be stubbified and then put up for translation at [[WP:TRANSLATION]]. BTW, if you're at all interested, we could always use more of your help at [[WP:PNT]], as we have a serious backlog of articles there. -[[User:Yupik|Yupik]] ([[User talk:Yupik|talk]]) 23:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
544940 +++$+++ Yupik +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544938 +++$+++ 544939 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.202975880E09 +++$+++ Thank you! :D - +++$+++ ::Thank you! :D -[[User:Yupik|Yupik]] ([[User talk:Yupik|talk]]) 23:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
544941 +++$+++ Yupik +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544938 +++$+++ 544940 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.202975880E09 +++$+++ And that should be [[Wikipedia:Translation]]. - +++$+++ :::And that should be [[Wikipedia:Translation]]. -[[User:Yupik|Yupik]] ([[User talk:Yupik|talk]]) 23:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

20652 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-10 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.236751200E09 +++$+++ Hi, you raise some interesting points, but I'm afraid that I am not certain of your exact question, can you make it a little clearer? If you wish to do so in the form of a question on the election nominations page I'd be happy to answer it \"officially\" there, or I can do so here if you prefer a more informal answer.-- +++$+++ Hi, you raise some interesting points, but I'm afraid that I am not certain of your exact question, can you make it a little clearer? If you wish to do so in the form of a question on the election nominations page I'd be happy to answer it "officially" there, or I can do so here if you prefer a more informal answer.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 23:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
20653 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20652 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.236819540E09 +++$+++ In summary therefore, I think that the project should not try to force or persuade editors to do one thing or the other, but instead provide the assistance and framework to do either or both. A quality benchmark does need to be set, but due to Wiki-wide differences in interpretation, GA and FA are the only places this can be standardised and the project needs to understand that and fall in line with it. As FA is (by its very nature) too difficult for many users to achieve often, GA is the next best port of call and the one that I feel should be used to differentiate between articles of high quality and those of \"low\". Hopefully this lengthy ramble has answered your question.-- +++$+++ ::In summary therefore, I think that the project should not try to force or persuade editors to do one thing or the other, but instead provide the assistance and framework to do either or both. A quality benchmark does need to be set, but due to Wiki-wide differences in interpretation, GA and FA are the only places this can be standardised and the project needs to understand that and fall in line with it. As FA is (by its very nature) too difficult for many users to achieve often, GA is the next best port of call and the one that I feel should be used to differentiate between articles of high quality and those of "low". Hopefully this lengthy ramble has answered your question.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 17:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
20654 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20652 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-11 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.236825060E09 +++$+++ Your accusation that MilitHist somehow inadvertantly sabotaged B class holds no weight I'm afraid. There is ''no'' way in which an assessment system run through wikiprojects can possibly hope to maintain its standards Wiki-wide. I remember when B class came in properly, and MilitHist found it inadequate for their articles and so adjusted it to fit the project by making it harder. Other projects did the opposite and as a result, B class is not recognised Wiki-wide as an assessment or an achievement; in some projects it is, in others merely a stage of development. C class will, I'm afraid, end in much the same result whether or not MilitHist adopts it (in fact it might be doing the class a favour by not doing so).-- +++$+++ :::Your accusation that MilitHist somehow inadvertantly sabotaged B class holds no weight I'm afraid. There is ''no'' way in which an assessment system run through wikiprojects can possibly hope to maintain its standards Wiki-wide. I remember when B class came in properly, and MilitHist found it inadequate for their articles and so adjusted it to fit the project by making it harder. Other projects did the opposite and as a result, B class is not recognised Wiki-wide as an assessment or an achievement; in some projects it is, in others merely a stage of development. C class will, I'm afraid, end in much the same result whether or not MilitHist adopts it (in fact it might be doing the class a favour by not doing so).--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 19:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
20655 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20652 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.236868920E09 +++$+++ I didn't mean \"accustaion\" in quite the way it sounded, and I'm sorry if I came across as aggressive or similar, it wasn't my intention. You are absolutely correct that the check box system for B class was devised here, but the reason it was is that B class was inadequate for the project's needs. A Wiki-wide standard is a good idea, I agree, but my standpoint is that we already have two Wiki-wide standards, GA and FA, and they are under strain due to their workload. Introduing another system below GA will only dilute the pool of reviewers further for a diminishing return.-- +++$+++ ::::I didn't mean "accustaion" in quite the way it sounded, and I'm sorry if I came across as aggressive or similar, it wasn't my intention. You are absolutely correct that the check box system for B class was devised here, but the reason it was is that B class was inadequate for the project's needs. A Wiki-wide standard is a good idea, I agree, but my standpoint is that we already have two Wiki-wide standards, GA and FA, and they are under strain due to their workload. Introduing another system below GA will only dilute the pool of reviewers further for a diminishing return.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 07:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
20656 +++$+++ Jackyd101 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20652 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-12 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.236909720E09 +++$+++ I will warn you now (again), that any attempt to force projects to abide by centralised rules on grading articles will fail to establish a universal consensus on what these rules are because the projects will inevitably operate in their own interests. The effect you desire can only be achieved by centralised processes outside the projects that are following the interests of the process, not the individual projects. These centralised processes are the only grades that can be relied upon Wiki-wide when considering publication or similar projects (and then not always). I do agree that consistency is the way forward for Wikipedia, but I strongly disagree with your ideas for how that can be achieved: not becuase I have anything against them personally, its just that my experience here tells me that they will not work.-- +++$+++ :::::I will warn you now (again), that any attempt to force projects to abide by centralised rules on grading articles will fail to establish a universal consensus on what these rules are because the projects will inevitably operate in their own interests. The effect you desire can only be achieved by centralised processes outside the projects that are following the interests of the process, not the individual projects. These centralised processes are the only grades that can be relied upon Wiki-wide when considering publication or similar projects (and then not always). I do agree that consistency is the way forward for Wikipedia, but I strongly disagree with your ideas for how that can be achieved: not becuase I have anything against them personally, its just that my experience here tells me that they will not work.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 19:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

20659 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-17 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.237308540E09 +++$+++ Regarding your 10000 reasonable articles that are unfairly labelled as Start, in the original Wikipedia-wide C-Class introduction debate back last year I argued for the removal of Start-Class. I still think this would make more sense ('start' is an unintuitive misnomer, and I think we discriminate too finely between the weaker articles to no benefit). If we were proposing the introduction of C-Class with the simultaneous removal of Start-Class from our project scale, I'd certainly support that ;)  +++$+++ Regarding your 10000 reasonable articles that are unfairly labelled as Start, in the original Wikipedia-wide C-Class introduction debate back last year I argued for the removal of Start-Class. I still think this would make more sense ('start' is an unintuitive misnomer, and I think we discriminate too finely between the weaker articles to no benefit). If we were proposing the introduction of C-Class with the simultaneous removal of Start-Class from our project scale, I'd certainly support that ;) [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 09:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
20660 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20659 +++$+++ 20659 +++$+++ 2009-03-17 10:28:00 +++$+++ 1.237310880E09 +++$+++ I certainly agree that some sort of quality indicator on articles themselves would be really useful, although currently only GA and FA are project-wide standards and thus suitably consistent, and I think we could do more to educate readers to look at the article talk-pages too - it's often where one gets a real feel for the veracity (or otherwise!) of the article content. However, I see this move to introduce C-Class as indicative of what might be a deeper problem at milhist at the moment; it's possible we've moved too far down the 'quality' road. I'm a huge proponent of article quality, but in my experience with GA, FA and milhist I've only ever seen assessment criteria become tighter, never looser, and I think while this drives up quality it does create gaps in the scale. Ideally I think we should be striving to maintain review consistency across a stable set of criteria, rather than allowing criteria to creep upwards and then filling in the gaps with additional stages... which themselves will then creep upwards too. I'd like to see this discussed before assessing the need for interim classes, as we may find we can address the gaps (which exist between B and A as well as Start and B) by renormalising our assessment criteria and ensuring reviewers don't over-assess. Inertia will ensure that removing C-Class will be far harder than adding it, and as I wrote I'm not convinced of the need for it just yet.  +++$+++ :I certainly agree that some sort of quality indicator on articles themselves would be really useful, although currently only GA and FA are project-wide standards and thus suitably consistent, and I think we could do more to educate readers to look at the article talk-pages too - it's often where one gets a real feel for the veracity (or otherwise!) of the article content. However, I see this move to introduce C-Class as indicative of what might be a deeper problem at milhist at the moment; it's possible we've moved too far down the 'quality' road. I'm a huge proponent of article quality, but in my experience with GA, FA and milhist I've only ever seen assessment criteria become tighter, never looser, and I think while this drives up quality it does create gaps in the scale. Ideally I think we should be striving to maintain review consistency across a stable set of criteria, rather than allowing criteria to creep upwards and then filling in the gaps with additional stages... which themselves will then creep upwards too. I'd like to see this discussed before assessing the need for interim classes, as we may find we can address the gaps (which exist between B and A as well as Start and B) by renormalising our assessment criteria and ensuring reviewers don't over-assess. Inertia will ensure that removing C-Class will be far harder than adding it, and as I wrote I'm not convinced of the need for it just yet. [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 10:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

544948 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544948 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.203154140E09 +++$+++ Tim, you do realize that the article is a [[WP:QFC|quick-fail]] right? It's got at least ten {{tl|fact}} tags and an {{tl|unreferenced-section}} banner.  +++$+++ Tim, you do realize that the article is a [[WP:QFC|quick-fail]] right? It's got at least ten {{tl|fact}} tags and an {{tl|unreferenced-section}} banner. [[User:VanTucky|'''Van''']][[User talk:VanTucky|<span style="color:#FF4F00">'''Tucky'''</span>]] 01:29, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
544949 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544948 +++$+++ 544948 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.203226260E09 +++$+++ Well, that's very kind of you to be that accommodating Tim, but it's a little unnecessary in my book. Nominators don't get to pick and choose their reviewers, and it doesn't really matter who reviews it if the article is a quick fail. I don't think it should get special treatment just because of the subject matter. If you don't feel comfortable quick failing it, I'd be happy to step up to the plate (or assist with a full review, if you prefer). Good luck,  +++$+++ :Well, that's very kind of you to be that accommodating Tim, but it's a little unnecessary in my book. Nominators don't get to pick and choose their reviewers, and it doesn't really matter who reviews it if the article is a quick fail. I don't think it should get special treatment just because of the subject matter. If you don't feel comfortable quick failing it, I'd be happy to step up to the plate (or assist with a full review, if you prefer). Good luck, [[User:VanTucky|'''Van''']][[User talk:VanTucky|<span style="color:#FF4F00">'''Tucky'''</span>]] 21:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

544950 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544950 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.203212820E09 +++$+++ Hey, Tim; I don't know anything about images, but from some of your other work, I've gleaned that you know how to crop images ???  The image at [[Simon Baron-Cohen]] (submitted by Zeraeph) is about half columns, half person.  Are we allowed to, and are you able to, crop it in half horizontally so it's only him, not columns? I don't know what \"awaiting GFDL confirmation\" means and what the free status of the image is; I just noticed as I'm getting ready to do some POV and [[WP:PEACOCK]]ery work on that article.  +++$+++ Hey, Tim; I don't know anything about images, but from some of your other work, I've gleaned that you know how to crop images ???  The image at [[Simon Baron-Cohen]] (submitted by Zeraeph) is about half columns, half person.  Are we allowed to, and are you able to, crop it in half horizontally so it's only him, not columns? I don't know what "awaiting GFDL confirmation" means and what the free status of the image is; I just noticed as I'm getting ready to do some POV and [[WP:PEACOCK]]ery work on that article. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:47, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
544951 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544950 +++$+++ 544950 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 20:27:00 +++$+++ 1.203222420E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much; you're a gem!!   +++$+++ :Thank you so much; you're a gem!!  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

20663 +++$+++ Skinny87 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20663 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-19 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.237484640E09 +++$+++ Np, not really. I oppose it, but if the majority want it then I won't go against that, and if it can be implemented automatically, then all the better.  +++$+++ Np, not really. I oppose it, but if the majority want it then I won't go against that, and if it can be implemented automatically, then all the better. [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 10:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
20664 +++$+++ Skinny87 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20663 +++$+++ 20663 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.237518360E09 +++$+++ Eh, to be honest I just plain don't like C-Class and the idea behind it, so I'll still oppose it. Your claims are also a tad hyperbolic; it's not like being a Coordinator grants me any extra power, you know.  +++$+++ :Eh, to be honest I just plain don't like C-Class and the idea behind it, so I'll still oppose it. Your claims are also a tad hyperbolic; it's not like being a Coordinator grants me any extra power, you know. [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 20:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

544952 +++$+++ STBotI +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-16 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.203222600E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.  +++$+++ If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. [[User:STBotI|STBotI]] ([[User talk:STBotI|talk]]) 20:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
544953 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544952 +++$+++ 544952 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.203226440E09 +++$+++ Wonderful :-)  There were problems with the original, so you get the notice.  Sorry :-)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color=\"green\">Georgia<\/font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)  I don't know anything about this, but I'll go leave a question at the copyright questions page to see if someone can fix it.   +++$+++ :Wonderful :-)  There were problems with the original, so you get the notice.  Sorry :-)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)  I don't know anything about this, but I'll go leave a question at the copyright questions page to see if someone can fix it.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
544954 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544952 +++$+++ 544953 +++$+++ 2008-02-16 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.203226680E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the trouble, Tim; ugh, this is why I stay away from images.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Simon_Baron-Cohen]   +++$+++ ::Sorry for the trouble, Tim; ugh, this is why I stay away from images.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Simon_Baron-Cohen]  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 21:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
544955 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544952 +++$+++ 544954 +++$+++ 2008-02-17 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.203237060E09 +++$+++ Whew.  Well, it was very nice of you to do it for me.   +++$+++ :::Whew.  Well, it was very nice of you to do it for me.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

20667 +++$+++ Simon Harley +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20667 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-10 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.241985180E09 +++$+++ [[User:Simon Harley\/Sandbox|This chunk]] I'm working on may interest you.  After I've fully worked out the U-boats involved (the sources conflict) I may put it into the article. --[[User:Simon Harley|Simon Harley]] ([[User talk:Simon Harley|talk]] | [[User:Simon Harley\/Library|library]] |  +++$+++ [[User:Simon Harley/Sandbox|This chunk]] I'm working on may interest you.  After I've fully worked out the U-boats involved (the sources conflict) I may put it into the article. --[[User:Simon Harley|Simon Harley]] ([[User talk:Simon Harley|talk]] | [[User:Simon Harley/Library|library]] | [[User:Simon Harley/Reviews|book reviews]]) 12:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
20668 +++$+++ Otisjimmy1 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20667 +++$+++ 20667 +++$+++ 2009-05-18 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.242707880E09 +++$+++ No Problem.    +++$+++ :No Problem.   [[User:Otisjimmy1|<font color="darkblue">'''Otis'''</font>]][[User talk:Otisjimmy1|<font color="darkgold">'''Jimmy'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Otisjimmy1|<font color="darkred">'''One'''</font>]] 21:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

20669 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-27 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.243483620E09 +++$+++ I am puzzled that you just deleted the file 'harry potter stamps'. This file seems to have existed for two years without deletion, so perhaps you could explain the grounds for speedy deletion?  +++$+++ I am puzzled that you just deleted the file 'harry potter stamps'. This file seems to have existed for two years without deletion, so perhaps you could explain the grounds for speedy deletion? [[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] ([[User talk:Sandpiper|talk]]) 21:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
20670 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20669 +++$+++ 20669 +++$+++ 2009-05-28 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.243523520E09 +++$+++ As regards the delay, unfortunately the folks who patrol fair use and other images for inappropriate content don't have as much time as they would like to dedicate to the process, so some invalid images stay up longer than others.  +++$+++ :As regards the delay, unfortunately the folks who patrol fair use and other images for inappropriate content don't have as much time as they would like to dedicate to the process, so some invalid images stay up longer than others. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 08:12, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

282814 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-02 10:35:00 +++$+++ 1.272821700E09 +++$+++ Great work! Sometime I'll begin writing a good article for Thimphu. If you haven;t got it already I think you'd enjoy the book ''Bhutan:Himalayan Mountain Kingdom'' which I have... +++$+++ Great work! Sometime I'll begin writing a good article for Thimphu. If you haven;t got it already I think you'd enjoy the book ''Bhutan:Himalayan Mountain Kingdom'' which I have...[[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 10:35, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
282815 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.272822480E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much. I don't have much on Bhutan except the '''old''', 2nd edition (1999) Footprint guide book to Tibet which also covers Bhutan with quite good coverage. You might find a second-hand copy cheap if you search a bit. The title is: ''Footprint Tibet Handbook with Bhutan'' by Gyurme Dorje, ISBN 1 900949 33 4. Their new guidebook to Tibet does not cover Bhutan - but, it is a fabulous up-to-date (2009) and detailed reference work on Tibet. I do also have a couple of good books and an excellent large-scale map of [[Mustang]], which I must get around to someday. All best wishes,  +++$+++ :Thanks so much. I don't have much on Bhutan except the '''old''', 2nd edition (1999) Footprint guide book to Tibet which also covers Bhutan with quite good coverage. You might find a second-hand copy cheap if you search a bit. The title is: ''Footprint Tibet Handbook with Bhutan'' by Gyurme Dorje, ISBN 1 900949 33 4. Their new guidebook to Tibet does not cover Bhutan - but, it is a fabulous up-to-date (2009) and detailed reference work on Tibet. I do also have a couple of good books and an excellent large-scale map of [[Mustang]], which I must get around to someday. All best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 10:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
282816 +++$+++ Nvvchar +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 282815 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.272822660E09 +++$+++ There could still be an issue of minimum five times prose expansion requirement for DYK (excluding infobox and references etc), which exludes words in quotes also. Please check. You may like to conisder putting the quoted text in your paraphrased format so that the same are also included in the word count.-- +++$+++ ::There could still be an issue of minimum five times prose expansion requirement for DYK (excluding infobox and references etc), which exludes words in quotes also. Please check. You may like to conisder putting the quoted text in your paraphrased format so that the same are also included in the word count.--[[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]) 10:51, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
282817 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.272822840E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much for the hint. I didn't know about the 5 x rule previously, nor the fact they don't count quotes. Will have a look. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks so much for the hint. I didn't know about the 5 x rule previously, nor the fact they don't count quotes. Will have a look. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 10:54, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
282818 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.272823320E09 +++$+++ I have just had a peep at it and I am sure there must be 5 times more text now than before I and you and Dr. Blofeld started adding to it. Have a look at what we started with at [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Karma_Gon_Monastery&oldid=330838407]. Best wishes,  +++$+++ :I have just had a peep at it and I am sure there must be 5 times more text now than before I and you and Dr. Blofeld started adding to it. Have a look at what we started with at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karma_Gon_Monastery&oldid=330838407]. Best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 11:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
282819 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 2010-05-12 02:21:00 +++$+++ 1.273656060E09 +++$+++ Would love to see your photos - just go to edit the page and click \"upload file\" at the left side of the page - then you will go to the Wikipedia site for uploading files. I suggest you take the option of clicking on through to Wikimedia Commons and uploading one of your images there (so it can be used on different Wiki projects). Anyway, you will find all the instructions on those pages as to how to it. It is a bit daunting the first time around - but I am sure you will figure out how to do it - the instructions are quite logical and intended to prevent copyright violations. Click on the statement that it is entirely your creation and then fill in all the boxes and, after checking, click \"upload\". Once you have uploaded the image file, copy its name and paste it into the article you wish it to appear in on its edit page - using similar formatting to that used by other images you will see on the edit page of the article - then click the \"show preview\" button at the bottom of the page and, if you are happy with the way it looks, click \"save page\" and it should appear in the article. If you have trouble getting the size or position right the first time, do not hesitate to let me know and I will try to help. Good luck with it all! Cheers,  +++$+++ :Would love to see your photos - just go to edit the page and click "upload file" at the left side of the page - then you will go to the Wikipedia site for uploading files. I suggest you take the option of clicking on through to Wikimedia Commons and uploading one of your images there (so it can be used on different Wiki projects). Anyway, you will find all the instructions on those pages as to how to it. It is a bit daunting the first time around - but I am sure you will figure out how to do it - the instructions are quite logical and intended to prevent copyright violations. Click on the statement that it is entirely your creation and then fill in all the boxes and, after checking, click "upload". Once you have uploaded the image file, copy its name and paste it into the article you wish it to appear in on its edit page - using similar formatting to that used by other images you will see on the edit page of the article - then click the "show preview" button at the bottom of the page and, if you are happy with the way it looks, click "save page" and it should appear in the article. If you have trouble getting the size or position right the first time, do not hesitate to let me know and I will try to help. Good luck with it all! Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 02:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
282820 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 2010-05-12 08:47:00 +++$+++ 1.273679220E09 +++$+++ If you have trouble doing this, please send me your email address (mine is: wynhill2@bigpond.net.au) and I will email you back your images already compressed which you can then upload and enter into a Wikipedia file. Whatever you do, congratulations, and many thanks for sharing these invaluable photographic records. Cheers and best wishes,  +++$+++ :If you have trouble doing this, please send me your email address (mine is: wynhill2@bigpond.net.au) and I will email you back your images already compressed which you can then upload and enter into a Wikipedia file. Whatever you do, congratulations, and many thanks for sharing these invaluable photographic records. Cheers and best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 08:47, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
282821 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 282814 +++$+++ 2010-05-13 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.273760760E09 +++$+++ How interesting! Thanks for the story as well as the great photos. Cheers and warmest wishes from Down Under  +++$+++ :How interesting! Thanks for the story as well as the great photos. Cheers and warmest wishes from Down Under [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 07:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

20674 +++$+++ Favonian +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-15 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.253043840E09 +++$+++ Hi Sandpiper.  Just saw your new article on the admiral.  According to the referenced source and most of the Google hits I've checked, his last name was hyphenated.  I suggest that the article be renamed, leaving behind a suitable redirect.  Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Sandpiper.  Just saw your new article on the admiral.  According to the referenced source and most of the Google hits I've checked, his last name was hyphenated.  I suggest that the article be renamed, leaving behind a suitable redirect.  Cheers, [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 12:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
20675 +++$+++ Favonian +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20674 +++$+++ 20674 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.253049900E09 +++$+++ On second thoughts, looks like all the references to his book on admiral Tryon have the name without the hyphen, so it's probably authoritative.  Let's keep the article name as is and get rid of some hyphens in the text.   +++$+++ :On second thoughts, looks like all the references to his book on admiral Tryon have the name without the hyphen, so it's probably authoritative.  Let's keep the article name as is and get rid of some hyphens in the text.  [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 14:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

20676 +++$+++ Rcbutcher +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-17 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.253202360E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've added some section headings to the article to add some structure to the text... feel free to change it if you don't like it.. I noticed the statement (don't know who from) : \"After another two years' good service, Agincourt was paid off in 1877 for re-armament, trading her outdated muzzle loading guns for new breach-loading ones\". The infobox at right states RML 7-inch guns were replaced in 1875 by RML 9-inch which makes more sense, as the new breechloaders (BL) weren't ready until 1880. Brassey's 1888 has Agincourt carrying 17 RML 9-inch. regards, Rod  +++$+++ Hi, I've added some section headings to the article to add some structure to the text... feel free to change it if you don't like it.. I noticed the statement (don't know who from) : "After another two years' good service, Agincourt was paid off in 1877 for re-armament, trading her outdated muzzle loading guns for new breach-loading ones". The infobox at right states RML 7-inch guns were replaced in 1875 by RML 9-inch which makes more sense, as the new breechloaders (BL) weren't ready until 1880. Brassey's 1888 has Agincourt carrying 17 RML 9-inch. regards, Rod [[User:Rcbutcher|Rcbutcher]] ([[User talk:Rcbutcher|talk]]) 08:46, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
20677 +++$+++ Rcbutcher +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20676 +++$+++ 20676 +++$+++ 2009-09-17 09:32:00 +++$+++ 1.253205120E09 +++$+++ Info I've dug up indicates she was in for refit 1875-1877, and RML guns were upgraded. Some sources say she got more 8 inch (http:\/\/www.battleships-cruisers.co.uk\/hms_agincourt1.htm), others (Brasseysd) 9-inch.  +++$+++ :Info I've dug up indicates she was in for refit 1875-1877, and RML guns were upgraded. Some sources say she got more 8 inch (http://www.battleships-cruisers.co.uk/hms_agincourt1.htm), others (Brasseysd) 9-inch. [[User:Rcbutcher|Rcbutcher]] ([[User talk:Rcbutcher|talk]]) 09:32, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

20678 +++$+++ DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20678 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-05 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.254749340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message. Sorry - to which of my many obsessed, ranting-loony edits on this painful topic are you referring? A little steer would be most helpful! Cheers  +++$+++ Thanks for the message. Sorry - to which of my many obsessed, ranting-loony edits on this painful topic are you referring? A little steer would be most helpful! Cheers [[User:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|DBaK]] ([[User talk:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|talk]]) 06:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
20679 +++$+++ DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20678 +++$+++ 20678 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.254749640E09 +++$+++ Oh hang on this is an ''HMS Insert-name-of-snake-here'' thing, right?! Heh, yes, I imagine they spelt it 93 different ways before it settled down. (If it has!) Cheers,  +++$+++ :Oh hang on this is an ''HMS Insert-name-of-snake-here'' thing, right?! Heh, yes, I imagine they spelt it 93 different ways before it settled down. (If it has!) Cheers, [[User:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|DBaK]] ([[User talk:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|talk]]) 06:34, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
20680 +++$+++ DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20678 +++$+++ 20679 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.254750960E09 +++$+++ Thanks, and yes, quite. Maybe I should go back to my more boring ''\"Middlesborough > Middlesbrough\"'' version and de-hostage myself! And, re your spellings - yes, maybe, but it's ''probably the only one I'd notice, ''due to the tragic depth of my obsession. I sometimes think it's the only thing I learnt at school - \"we live near Guis''BOR''ough, and that large (and fragrant) town over there is Middles''BR''ough!\" or words to that effect. :) Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Thanks, and yes, quite. Maybe I should go back to my more boring ''"Middlesborough > Middlesbrough"'' version and de-hostage myself! And, re your spellings - yes, maybe, but it's ''probably the only one I'd notice, ''due to the tragic depth of my obsession. I sometimes think it's the only thing I learnt at school - "we live near Guis''BOR''ough, and that large (and fragrant) town over there is Middles''BR''ough!" or words to that effect. :) Cheers, [[User:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|DBaK]] ([[User talk:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|talk]]) 06:56, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
20681 +++$+++ DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20678 +++$+++ 20680 +++$+++ 2009-10-05 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.254765120E09 +++$+++ Yes quite - I wondered about that one too. But, as you say, given the standards of literacy of the time ... all I can say is Good Luck! :)  +++$+++ :::Yes quite - I wondered about that one too. But, as you say, given the standards of literacy of the time ... all I can say is Good Luck! :) [[User:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|DBaK]] ([[User talk:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|talk]]) 10:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

282824 +++$+++ S Marshall +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282824 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-24 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.274752440E09 +++$+++ Hi John Hill<p>In the AfD nomination above, you posted someone's email address.  I'm certain you did this for the best of reasons.  Wikipedia has a policy on this, though, called [[WP:PRIVACY]], and so I'm afraid one of your edits has been [[WP:OVERSIGHT|oversighted]].<p>Cheers\u2014 +++$+++ Hi John Hill<p>In the AfD nomination above, you posted someone's email address.  I'm certain you did this for the best of reasons.  Wikipedia has a policy on this, though, called [[WP:PRIVACY]], and so I'm afraid one of your edits has been [[WP:OVERSIGHT|oversighted]].<p>Cheers—[[User:S Marshall|<font face="Verdana" color="Maroon">'''S Marshall'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:S Marshall|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/S Marshall|C]]</small> 18:54, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
282825 +++$+++ Ultraexactzz +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282824 +++$+++ 282824 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.274758800E09 +++$+++ I should also note that the article has been deleted, per your request and AGF on the e-mailed request. The fact that the subject no longer exists played a role, as well. Best,  +++$+++ :I should also note that the article has been deleted, per your request and AGF on the e-mailed request. The fact that the subject no longer exists played a role, as well. Best, [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Said]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Did]] </small> 20:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

544970 +++$+++ ClockworkSoul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-25 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.203988620E09 +++$+++ Just dropping in to say hello. :)  How have things been? &ndash;  +++$+++ Just dropping in to say hello. :)  How have things been? &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 17:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
544971 +++$+++ ClockworkSoul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544970 +++$+++ 544970 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.203989700E09 +++$+++ I wrote part of a program to do it by hand, but when the number of pages under our banner increased by an order of magnitude it broke my logic. I'll have to write something anew when I have a little more time. Part of the problem is that we can no longer fit all of the articles on a single page, so I'll have to teach the software to do some kind of yet-to-be-determined wizardry. &ndash;  +++$+++ : I wrote part of a program to do it by hand, but when the number of pages under our banner increased by an order of magnitude it broke my logic. I'll have to write something anew when I have a little more time. Part of the problem is that we can no longer fit all of the articles on a single page, so I'll have to teach the software to do some kind of yet-to-be-determined wizardry. &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 17:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

282831 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282831 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-28 03:02:00 +++$+++ 1.280311320E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Capsot, for your invitation to support your project - and have just added my name to the list of your supporters and placed your tag on my personal page. Good luck with it all! please excuse me for not writing in Catalan - I can read it slowly with a good bilingual dictionary handy - but I certainly cannot write in it. Glad to hear you have checked out the sad story of the [[Beothuk]] people - too few people know anything about them at all. Cheers and best wishes,  +++$+++ Thank you, Capsot, for your invitation to support your project - and have just added my name to the list of your supporters and placed your tag on my personal page. Good luck with it all! please excuse me for not writing in Catalan - I can read it slowly with a good bilingual dictionary handy - but I certainly cannot write in it. Glad to hear you have checked out the sad story of the [[Beothuk]] people - too few people know anything about them at all. Cheers and best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 03:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
282832 +++$+++ Capsot +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282831 +++$+++ 282831 +++$+++ 2010-07-28 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.280326980E09 +++$+++ Thanks, no problem with Catalan, if you can read it it's surely a first good step but well as long as we can understand each other there's no real problem. Thanks for your support. It's really sad to know that a nation, culture and language dies and that we know so little about them... I'll try to expand the Catalan version of the article and maybe translate it to Occitan as soon as I can have some spare time so they get to be a little more known. I wish you good luck with your research and hope you'll write more interesting books some time soon. If you ever need something from me about Catalan, Occitan or else, just let me know I'll be real glad to help! I wish you all the best, take care, my friend!  +++$+++ : Thanks, no problem with Catalan, if you can read it it's surely a first good step but well as long as we can understand each other there's no real problem. Thanks for your support. It's really sad to know that a nation, culture and language dies and that we know so little about them... I'll try to expand the Catalan version of the article and maybe translate it to Occitan as soon as I can have some spare time so they get to be a little more known. I wish you good luck with your research and hope you'll write more interesting books some time soon. If you ever need something from me about Catalan, Occitan or else, just let me know I'll be real glad to help! I wish you all the best, take care, my friend! [[User:Capsot|Capsot]] ([[User talk:Capsot|talk]]) 07:23, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

282833 +++$+++ Soman +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-29 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.280400300E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Gyantse Dzong]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Gyantse Dzong|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible.  Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Gyantse Dzong]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Gyantse Dzong|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible.  Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 03:45, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
282834 +++$+++ Jujutacular +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282833 +++$+++ 282833 +++$+++ 2010-07-29 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.280437440E09 +++$+++ Sorry for possibly jumping the gun a<sub>Subscript text<\/sub> bit there, the article just looked so nice! {{=)}} Hopefully I didn't put you into too much of a rush to fix it up. ''' +++$+++ :Sorry for possibly jumping the gun a<sub>Subscript text</sub> bit there, the article just looked so nice! {{=)}} Hopefully I didn't put you into too much of a rush to fix it up. '''[[User:Jujutacular|<span style="color:#006400;">Jujutacular</span>]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Jujutacular|T]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Jujutacular|C]]</sup> 14:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
282835 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282833 +++$+++ 282834 +++$+++ 2010-07-29 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.280440380E09 +++$+++ No, Jujutacular, not at all, you did me a favour, thank you. I needed a little shove to get going on it as I leave for 3 and a half months travel in India next Wednesday and will have little time or opportunity to work on the WP while I am travelling, though I will be checking in from time to time when I am within range of wi-fi and not too busy. I have added a lot of detail today - probably too much. I will try to look at it tomorrow to see how it might be improved and if I can find an interesting hook to make a good DYK contribution. Many thanks and all best wishes. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::No, Jujutacular, not at all, you did me a favour, thank you. I needed a little shove to get going on it as I leave for 3 and a half months travel in India next Wednesday and will have little time or opportunity to work on the WP while I am travelling, though I will be checking in from time to time when I am within range of wi-fi and not too busy. I have added a lot of detail today - probably too much. I will try to look at it tomorrow to see how it might be improved and if I can find an interesting hook to make a good DYK contribution. Many thanks and all best wishes. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 14:53, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

47139 +++$+++ DavidShaw +++$+++ Canterbury Tail +++$+++ 47139 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-26 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.288148880E09 +++$+++ I've put a proposed revision of this entry on the [[Talk:Canterbury]] page.   +++$+++ I've put a proposed revision of this entry on the [[Talk:Canterbury]] page.  [[User:DavidShaw|Vidoue]] ([[User talk:DavidShaw|talk]]) 20:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
47140 +++$+++ Canterbury Tail +++$+++ Canterbury Tail +++$+++ 47139 +++$+++ 47139 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.289106300E09 +++$+++ I think you've made a mistake somewhere. The spelling is Rachael. It has always been Rachael. The movie credits say this, the documentaries say this, the inlays with every release I own say this, Future Noir says this. I don't know what release you're looking at but every reliable source states the spelling as Rachael including the movies credits. What release do you have that has it spelt differently to the rest of them?  +++$+++ :I think you've made a mistake somewhere. The spelling is Rachael. It has always been Rachael. The movie credits say this, the documentaries say this, the inlays with every release I own say this, Future Noir says this. I don't know what release you're looking at but every reliable source states the spelling as Rachael including the movies credits. What release do you have that has it spelt differently to the rest of them? [[User:Canterbury Tail|<font color="Blue">'''Canterbury Tail'''</font>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|''<font color="Blue">talk</font>'']] 22:05, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

282836 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282836 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-30 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.280514240E09 +++$+++ Wow that's wonderful work!!! +++$+++ Wow that's wonderful work!!![[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 11:24, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
282837 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282836 +++$+++ 282836 +++$+++ 2010-08-01 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.280651040E09 +++$+++ Thanks so much, my friend, for the gratifying praise. I have also just completed an article on the nearby [[Tsechen Monastery and Dzong]] which you might like to take a peek at. Have been rushing to get these done (between packing and getting our home ready for the woman who is going to babysit it while we are away). We leave for India early on Wednesday morning - so communications and contributions to WP from me will probably be rather sparse till after we return in November. All best wishes,  +++$+++ :Thanks so much, my friend, for the gratifying praise. I have also just completed an article on the nearby [[Tsechen Monastery and Dzong]] which you might like to take a peek at. Have been rushing to get these done (between packing and getting our home ready for the woman who is going to babysit it while we are away). We leave for India early on Wednesday morning - so communications and contributions to WP from me will probably be rather sparse till after we return in November. All best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 01:24, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

282838 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282838 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-18 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.279492560E09 +++$+++ Lovely. Before you leave can you expand [[User:Nvvchar\/sandbox\/Miscel.]], Shigatse Dzong!! +++$+++ Lovely. Before you leave can you expand [[User:Nvvchar/sandbox/Miscel.]], Shigatse Dzong!![[User:Dr. Blofeld|'''<em style="font-family:Calisto MT;color:black"> Dr.</em>''']] [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|'''<em style="font-family:Calisto MT;color:black">Blofeld</em>''']] - 15:36, 18 July 2010 (UTC) 10:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
282839 +++$+++ Nvvchar +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282838 +++$+++ 282838 +++$+++ 2010-08-02 11:49:00 +++$+++ 1.280774940E09 +++$+++ I have added some more text under Geography and History sections, which you may like to edit. Wish you happy holiday in my country. Please write to me if you need any help (my e-mail<nvv_char@yahoo.com>). Your article [[Gyantse Dzong]] is very erudite work.-- +++$+++ :I have added some more text under Geography and History sections, which you may like to edit. Wish you happy holiday in my country. Please write to me if you need any help (my e-mail<nvv_char@yahoo.com>). Your article [[Gyantse Dzong]] is very erudite work.--[[User:Nvvchar| <span style="border:1px solid navy;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:	#191970;">'''''N.V.V. Char'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Nvvchar| <font size="-4"><font color="#0095B6">Talk</font></font color> ]]</sup>. 11:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

20695 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-23 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.293095160E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you uploaded a couple of maps of the shipping exclusion zones declared by britain\/germany in WWI. I want one map showing both the british and German zones for the 'RMS Lusitania' article as they were declared at that time and was thinking of creating one. There are maps of both in Bailey and Ryan's book on Lusitania, but the german one is different to the one you uploaded. Not encouraging. I wondered if you happened to know whether the map you posted is accurate, or anywhere I might be able to see accurate ones? +++$+++ I noticed that you uploaded a couple of maps of the shipping exclusion zones declared by britain/germany in WWI. I want one map showing both the british and German zones for the 'RMS Lusitania' article as they were declared at that time and was thinking of creating one. There are maps of both in Bailey and Ryan's book on Lusitania, but the german one is different to the one you uploaded. Not encouraging. I wondered if you happened to know whether the map you posted is accurate, or anywhere I might be able to see accurate ones?[[User:Sandpiper|Sandpiper]] ([[User talk:Sandpiper|talk]]) 01:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
20696 +++$+++ Rcbutcher +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20695 +++$+++ 20695 +++$+++ 2010-12-23 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.293155340E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I can't add any more information - they are the only maps I have seen. It would be great if you could construct an accurate map ! Regards, Rod  +++$+++ :Sorry, I can't add any more information - they are the only maps I have seen. It would be great if you could construct an accurate map ! Regards, Rod [[User:Rcbutcher|Rcbutcher]] ([[User talk:Rcbutcher|talk]]) 17:49, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

282841 +++$+++ Ghostexorcist +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-31 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.280636700E09 +++$+++ I was wondering if you knew of any examples of non-Chinese who lived on the northwestern boarders of Han China who may have worn turbans and had common facial features, such as sunken eyes and large noses? The reason I ask is because general Li Guangli noted some people with the same features during his attempts to expand the Han borders in 108 CE. The author of a book I'm reviewing believes these were Jews. I think this is dubious as I have the same facial features and I don't even have a single drop of Jewish blood in my family. -- +++$+++ I was wondering if you knew of any examples of non-Chinese who lived on the northwestern boarders of Han China who may have worn turbans and had common facial features, such as sunken eyes and large noses? The reason I ask is because general Li Guangli noted some people with the same features during his attempts to expand the Han borders in 108 CE. The author of a book I'm reviewing believes these were Jews. I think this is dubious as I have the same facial features and I don't even have a single drop of Jewish blood in my family. --[[User:Ghostexorcist|Ghostexorcist]] ([[User talk:Ghostexorcist|talk]]) 21:25, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
282842 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282841 +++$+++ 282841 +++$+++ 2010-07-31 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.280642160E09 +++$+++ Certainly there were lots of people of quite different facial features during Han times along the northwestern borders of China (in modern [[Xinjiang]]). In fact, many mummies with pronounced Caucasian features (and DNA) have been found in the [[Taklamakan]] desert dating from several thousand years ago up until the Han period. As these were very ancient trade routes, representations all sorts of people were present in the region (Indians, Sogdians, Persians, Jews, [[Yuezhi]], [[Xiongnu]], and possibly even Syrians and Greeks, etc., etc., etc.). So, unless your author thinks he or she can identify the people from their clothes alone, I would be very sceptical indeed of claims that they were Jews. Perhaps the costumes illustrated may give some hint of ethnicity but, if they do, the author should carefully discuss this and give the reasons for their identification. Otherwise, the claim should be disregarded as mere guesswork. Hope that helps. Cheers and best wishes,  +++$+++ :Certainly there were lots of people of quite different facial features during Han times along the northwestern borders of China (in modern [[Xinjiang]]). In fact, many mummies with pronounced Caucasian features (and DNA) have been found in the [[Taklamakan]] desert dating from several thousand years ago up until the Han period. As these were very ancient trade routes, representations all sorts of people were present in the region (Indians, Sogdians, Persians, Jews, [[Yuezhi]], [[Xiongnu]], and possibly even Syrians and Greeks, etc., etc., etc.). So, unless your author thinks he or she can identify the people from their clothes alone, I would be very sceptical indeed of claims that they were Jews. Perhaps the costumes illustrated may give some hint of ethnicity but, if they do, the author should carefully discuss this and give the reasons for their identification. Otherwise, the claim should be disregarded as mere guesswork. Hope that helps. Cheers and best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
282843 +++$+++ Ghostexorcist +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282841 +++$+++ 282842 +++$+++ 2010-08-01 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.280713020E09 +++$+++ Basically, the description of these people fits in with the author\u2019s theory that Jews left Israel and later settled in China. He believes the headdress was the coiffure worn by the Jewish Kohen-Priests. However, he admits: \u201cWhether it was a turban (diadem) or a coiffure was not clear (the Chinese character has both meanings).\u201d Like I said previously, you don\u2019t have to be Jewish to have those types of features, so that could be any number of people Li Guang described. -- +++$+++ ::Basically, the description of these people fits in with the author’s theory that Jews left Israel and later settled in China. He believes the headdress was the coiffure worn by the Jewish Kohen-Priests. However, he admits: “Whether it was a turban (diadem) or a coiffure was not clear (the Chinese character has both meanings).” Like I said previously, you don’t have to be Jewish to have those types of features, so that could be any number of people Li Guang described. --[[User:Ghostexorcist|Ghostexorcist]] ([[User talk:Ghostexorcist|talk]]) 18:37, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
282844 +++$+++ Ghostexorcist +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282841 +++$+++ 282843 +++$+++ 2010-08-01 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.280714280E09 +++$+++ I just did some looking around based on the description of the area the people lived in and their lively hood. I think a very good candidate could be the [[Dayuan]]. It's in the same area, same time period, you've got the grapes and horses, and the article says something about caucasian features (whatever that may be). I would like to find out more of what those features were. I'm sure if I dug a little deeper that I could find something about headdress too. -- +++$+++ :::I just did some looking around based on the description of the area the people lived in and their lively hood. I think a very good candidate could be the [[Dayuan]]. It's in the same area, same time period, you've got the grapes and horses, and the article says something about caucasian features (whatever that may be). I would like to find out more of what those features were. I'm sure if I dug a little deeper that I could find something about headdress too. --[[User:Ghostexorcist|Ghostexorcist]] ([[User talk:Ghostexorcist|talk]]) 18:58, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
282845 +++$+++ Ghostexorcist +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282841 +++$+++ 282842 +++$+++ 2010-08-02 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.280788140E09 +++$+++ How is your second book coming along?-- +++$+++ ::How is your second book coming along?--[[User:Ghostexorcist|Ghostexorcist]] ([[User talk:Ghostexorcist|talk]]) 15:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

615119 +++$+++ MBK004 +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615119 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-14 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.252979520E09 +++$+++ You created your RFA on 6 September but never completed the process. If you wish for this to happen, you need to re-initiate the process by changing the end-time to a week from now and then transclude it to [[WP:RFA]]. -''' +++$+++ You created your RFA on 6 September but never completed the process. If you wish for this to happen, you need to re-initiate the process by changing the end-time to a week from now and then transclude it to [[WP:RFA]]. -'''[[User:MBK004|MBK]]'''<sub>[[User talk:MBK004|004]]</sub> 18:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
615120 +++$+++ Roger Davies +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615119 +++$+++ 615119 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.253015520E09 +++$+++ Before you transclude, you might like to take the opportunity to flesh out your nomination statement a little. People will be interested in hearing how you plan to use the tools, for example, and about any experience you have in admin-related areas (nominating articles for [[WP:CSD]] in the obvious one, though there are plenty of others listed [[WP:ADMIN#Places where administrators in particular can assist|'''here''']]. &nbsp; +++$+++ :Before you transclude, you might like to take the opportunity to flesh out your nomination statement a little. People will be interested in hearing how you plan to use the tools, for example, and about any experience you have in admin-related areas (nominating articles for [[WP:CSD]] in the obvious one, though there are plenty of others listed [[WP:ADMIN#Places where administrators in particular can assist|'''here''']]. &nbsp;[[User:Roger Davies|<span style="color:maroon; font-variant:small-caps">'''Roger&nbsp;Davies'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 04:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

20701 +++$+++ Tirronan +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20701 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-02 03:59:00 +++$+++ 1.299067140E09 +++$+++ Thank you I have made chances will you check and see if that meets your requirements? +++$+++ Thank you I have made chances will you check and see if that meets your requirements?[[User:Tirronan|Tirronan]] ([[User talk:Tirronan|talk]]) 03:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
20702 +++$+++ Tirronan +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20701 +++$+++ 20701 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.299103260E09 +++$+++ One thing to bear in mind, this like Jutland has its share of coverup's and more than a few.  Then you get to the outright lying that you get in some histories, like going back to 1920 and trying to find a 1812 history book without a serious national slant.  Borodino is worse than that actually.  Anything written by a Russian Author during the Soviet Era you really have to watch, and western histories tend to try and just use French sources as much as possible, and the characters on the French side are if anything worse at lying at the time. +++$+++ :One thing to bear in mind, this like Jutland has its share of coverup's and more than a few.  Then you get to the outright lying that you get in some histories, like going back to 1920 and trying to find a 1812 history book without a serious national slant.  Borodino is worse than that actually.  Anything written by a Russian Author during the Soviet Era you really have to watch, and western histories tend to try and just use French sources as much as possible, and the characters on the French side are if anything worse at lying at the time.[[User:Tirronan|Tirronan]] ([[User talk:Tirronan|talk]]) 14:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

282846 +++$+++ Espresso Addict +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282846 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-04 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.280987220E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Saw-shelled Turtle]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Saw-shelled Turtle|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible.  Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem-->  +++$+++ [[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Saw-shelled Turtle]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Saw-shelled Turtle|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible.  Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] <small>([[User talk:Espresso Addict|talk]])</small> 22:47, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
282847 +++$+++ Espresso Addict +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282846 +++$+++ 282846 +++$+++ 2010-08-06 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.281114000E09 +++$+++ Another editor has shortened the hook to conform with the format -- it's now in the queue at [[Template:Did you know\/Queue\/2|Queue 2]], which is scheduled for tomorrow. If you'd prefer to change the wording let me know what you'd prefer asap and I can do the edit for you, as the queues are fully protected. Regards,  +++$+++ :Another editor has shortened the hook to conform with the format -- it's now in the queue at [[Template:Did you know/Queue/2|Queue 2]], which is scheduled for tomorrow. If you'd prefer to change the wording let me know what you'd prefer asap and I can do the edit for you, as the queues are fully protected. Regards, [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] <small>([[User talk:Espresso Addict|talk]])</small> 10:00, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

20703 +++$+++ Tirronan +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20703 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-02 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.299071880E09 +++$+++ some of the stuff I found.  There is a link to this at the talk page  +++$+++ some of the stuff I found.  There is a link to this at the talk page [[User:Tirronan|Tirronan]] ([[User talk:Tirronan|talk]]) 05:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
20704 +++$+++ Tirronan +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20703 +++$+++ 20703 +++$+++ 2011-03-02 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.299102960E09 +++$+++ All this stuff, is just to give you look at what I am seeing, though I am getting convinced that Jellico was covering up as much as Beatty. +++$+++ :All this stuff, is just to give you look at what I am seeing, though I am getting convinced that Jellico was covering up as much as Beatty.[[User:Tirronan|Tirronan]] ([[User talk:Tirronan|talk]]) 13:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

20706 +++$+++ Gabriele449 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-12 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.299985860E09 +++$+++ I recently reverted an edit and you post it on my talkpage. I reverted that edit because it cited no references nor sources.  +++$+++ I recently reverted an edit and you post it on my talkpage. I reverted that edit because it cited no references nor sources. [[User:Gabriele449|<font color="red">'''Gabesta449'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Gabriele449|<font color="blue"><sup>edits</sup></font>]] <sup>♦</sup> [[User talk:Gabriele449|<font color="gold"><sup>chat</sup></font>]] 19:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
20707 +++$+++ Gabriele449 +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20706 +++$+++ 20706 +++$+++ 2011-03-12 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.299985860E09 +++$+++ Respond on my talk page, Thanks.  +++$+++ :Respond on my talk page, Thanks. [[User:Gabriele449|<font color="red">'''Gabesta449'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Gabriele449|<font color="blue"><sup>edits</sup></font>]] <sup>♦</sup> [[User talk:Gabriele449|<font color="gold"><sup>chat</sup></font>]] 19:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

20708 +++$+++ Funandtrvl +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-13 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.300075320E09 +++$+++ Hi Sandpiper, just to let you know, since I've had to replace the deleted ref name twice, that [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fukushima_I_nuclear_accidents&action=historysubmit&diff=418658970&oldid=418658848 your edit] added back in the dupe ref from Bloomberg\/BusinessWeek (they're owned by the same company), that's already referenced earlier in the article. So I've added back in the ref name, thanks, -- +++$+++ Hi Sandpiper, just to let you know, since I've had to replace the deleted ref name twice, that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fukushima_I_nuclear_accidents&action=historysubmit&diff=418658970&oldid=418658848 your edit] added back in the dupe ref from Bloomberg/BusinessWeek (they're owned by the same company), that's already referenced earlier in the article. So I've added back in the ref name, thanks, --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 21:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
20709 +++$+++ Funandtrvl +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20708 +++$+++ 20708 +++$+++ 2011-03-13 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.300076040E09 +++$+++ No problem!! I found 2 more dupe refs that I'm trying to clean up, I know what you mean about edit conflicts. -- +++$+++ :No problem!! I found 2 more dupe refs that I'm trying to clean up, I know what you mean about edit conflicts. --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 21:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

571430 +++$+++ MichaelBillington +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-04 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.170588720E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just stumbled accross your signature at [[Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Editprotected_External_link_for_correspondence_chess:_http:.2F.2Fwww.atlanticgames.net|TFD]], and was hoping you might be willing to tone it down a bit, that size 5 text changes the size of the line it's on. (not to mention being annoying - but that's just my opinion) Also, take a look at [[WP:SIG#Appearance and color]] (first item on the list) -- +++$+++ Hi, I just stumbled accross your signature at [[Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Editprotected_External_link_for_correspondence_chess:_http:.2F.2Fwww.atlanticgames.net|TFD]], and was hoping you might be willing to tone it down a bit, that size 5 text changes the size of the line it's on. (not to mention being annoying - but that's just my opinion) Also, take a look at [[WP:SIG#Appearance and color]] (first item on the list) --[[User:MichaelBillington|Michael Billington]] ([[User talk:MichaelBillington|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MichaelBillington|contribs]]) 03:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
571431 +++$+++ Dgies +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.170641340E09 +++$+++ '''Seconded'''  You beat me to it. &mdash; +++$+++ *'''Seconded'''  You beat me to it. &mdash;[[User:Dgies|Dgies]]<sup>[[User talk:Dgies|t]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Dgies|c]]</sup> 18:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
571432 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.170661500E09 +++$+++ Cheers, <font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"5\"> +++$+++ :Cheers, <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="5">[[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] </sup>   </font> 23:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
571433 +++$+++ Dgies +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ 571432 +++$+++ 2007-02-04 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.170662220E09 +++$+++ So clearly size 2 is standard text size, and the least obtrusive, but you could probably use size 3 without calling too much attention to yourself. &mdash; +++$+++ :: So clearly size 2 is standard text size, and the least obtrusive, but you could probably use size 3 without calling too much attention to yourself. &mdash;[[User:Dgies|Dgies]]<sup>[[User talk:Dgies|t]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Dgies|c]]</sup> 23:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
571434 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ 571433 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.170662940E09 +++$+++ Too small to be readable, what about just this: {{user|Dfrg.msc}}? <font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"5\"> +++$+++ :::Too small to be readable, what about just this: {{user|Dfrg.msc}}? <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="5">[[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] </sup>   </font> 00:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
571435 +++$+++ Dgies +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ 571434 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.170663240E09 +++$+++ You know we all have different monitors and eyes, and size 2 looks just fine to me, but the plain unstyled version: [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] is fine too. &mdash; +++$+++ :::: You know we all have different monitors and eyes, and size 2 looks just fine to me, but the plain unstyled version: [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] is fine too. &mdash;[[User:Dgies|Dgies]]<sup>[[User talk:Dgies|t]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Dgies|c]]</sup> 00:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
571436 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ 571435 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.170663540E09 +++$+++ Interesting concept, I user Mozilla FF 2 with a LCD and 1280 x 1024 resolution. If size 2 looks fine to you, Size 5 must be '''huge'''. <font face=\"Edwardian Script ITC\" size=\"5\"> +++$+++ :::::Interesting concept, I user Mozilla FF 2 with a LCD and 1280 x 1024 resolution. If size 2 looks fine to you, Size 5 must be '''huge'''. <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="5">[[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] </sup>   </font> 00:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
571437 +++$+++ Dgies +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ 571436 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.170663720E09 +++$+++ You can control text size in Mozilla by typing Ctrl+(minus key) or Ctrl+(plus key)  But still, size 2 should look the same as the regular (non-signature) text. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::::You can control text size in Mozilla by typing Ctrl+(minus key) or Ctrl+(plus key)  But still, size 2 should look the same as the regular (non-signature) text. &mdash;[[User:Dgies|Dgies]]<sup>[[User talk:Dgies|t]]&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Dgies|c]]</sup> 00:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
571438 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ 571437 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.170663900E09 +++$+++ I'll just change it to the non-stylized version. Thanks for your patience.  +++$+++ :::::::I'll just change it to the non-stylized version. Thanks for your patience. [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 00:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
571439 +++$+++ Ligulem +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ 571438 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.170696000E09 +++$+++ I do like your new sig. Thank you for handling the comments about your sig in such a friendly and positive manner. Well done. -- +++$+++ ::::::::I do like your new sig. Thank you for handling the comments about your sig in such a friendly and positive manner. Well done. --[[User:Ligulem|Ligulem]] 09:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
571440 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571430 +++$+++ 571439 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.170747600E09 +++$+++ Thanks mate, I more than happy to co-operate where required. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::::::::Thanks mate, I more than happy to co-operate where required. Cheers, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 23:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

544999 +++$+++ Delimitation +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544999 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-04 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.204693140E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, I'd like to copy the useful set of Quick Links on your userspace page to my userspace page. I'd reformat them (eventually) and credit you if you'd like. Just trying to prevent re-inventing the wheel.  +++$+++ Hi Tim, I'd like to copy the useful set of Quick Links on your userspace page to my userspace page. I'd reformat them (eventually) and credit you if you'd like. Just trying to prevent re-inventing the wheel. [[User:Delimitation|Delimitation]] ([[User talk:Delimitation|talk]]) 20:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
545000 +++$+++ Delimitation +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 544999 +++$+++ 544999 +++$+++ 2008-03-04 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.204695060E09 +++$+++ Thanks Tim!  +++$+++ : Thanks Tim! [[User:Delimitation|Delimitation]] ([[User talk:Delimitation|talk]]) 21:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

282857 +++$+++ Per Honor et Gloria +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282857 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-14 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.289742480E09 +++$+++ The work of John Hill is already being used as reference material by historians such as Christopher I. Beckwith (1945-), professor of Central Eurasian Studies at Indiana University in Bloomington, Indiana: see Professor Beckwith's bibliography [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=5jG1eHe3y4EC&pg=PA439 ''Empires of the Silk Road: a history of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age'' Christopher I. Beckwith p.439], or on page 440 [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=5jG1eHe3y4EC&pg=PA439&dq=Hill+%22Jade+gate+to+Rome%22&hl=ja&ei=XnXfTJrBOJCmvgO5xZ2nDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Jade%20Gate%20to%20Rome%20&f=false Though the Jade Gate to Rome], also [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=5jG1eHe3y4EC&pg=PA440 p.440]. ''\"The Western Regions according to the Hou Hanshu\"'', John's earlier work and the basis of ''\"Through the Jade Gate to Rome\"'', is also used as a reference by a multiplicity of authors: [http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?tbs=bks%3A1&tbo=1&hl=ja&q=%22The+Western+Regions+according+to+the+Hou+Hanshu%22], including the Journal of Asian History.  +++$+++ The work of John Hill is already being used as reference material by historians such as Christopher I. Beckwith (1945-), professor of Central Eurasian Studies at Indiana University in Bloomington, Indiana: see Professor Beckwith's bibliography [http://books.google.com/books?id=5jG1eHe3y4EC&pg=PA439 ''Empires of the Silk Road: a history of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age'' Christopher I. Beckwith p.439], or on page 440 [http://books.google.com/books?id=5jG1eHe3y4EC&pg=PA439&dq=Hill+%22Jade+gate+to+Rome%22&hl=ja&ei=XnXfTJrBOJCmvgO5xZ2nDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Jade%20Gate%20to%20Rome%20&f=false Though the Jade Gate to Rome], also [http://books.google.com/books?id=5jG1eHe3y4EC&pg=PA440 p.440]. ''"The Western Regions according to the Hou Hanshu"'', John's earlier work and the basis of ''"Through the Jade Gate to Rome"'', is also used as a reference by a multiplicity of authors: [http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks%3A1&tbo=1&hl=ja&q=%22The+Western+Regions+according+to+the+Hou+Hanshu%22], including the Journal of Asian History. [[User:Per Honor et Gloria|''<b><Font color="#FF0000">Per&nbsp;</Font><Font color="#FF8000">Honor&nbsp;</Font><Font color="Orange">et&nbsp;</Font><Font color="#FFC000">Gloria</Font></b>'']]&nbsp;[[User talk:Per Honor et Gloria|<big>✍</big>]] 05:48, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
282858 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282857 +++$+++ 282857 +++$+++ 2010-11-14 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.289784420E09 +++$+++ Citations help a lot. Amazon reviews, frankly, are useless. I can find books full of complete nonsense, even lies, that get multiple 5 star reviews. And being used in a bibliography is not any help either, I'm afraid (I know some bibliographies include books not because they are good but because they are bad). I do think this should be discussed at [[WP:RSN]] at some point because others will, I hope (because of our stance on self-published works) raise the issue. It looks as though this could be an exception.  +++$+++ :Citations help a lot. Amazon reviews, frankly, are useless. I can find books full of complete nonsense, even lies, that get multiple 5 star reviews. And being used in a bibliography is not any help either, I'm afraid (I know some bibliographies include books not because they are good but because they are bad). I do think this should be discussed at [[WP:RSN]] at some point because others will, I hope (because of our stance on self-published works) raise the issue. It looks as though this could be an exception. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 17:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

545002 +++$+++ Ciar +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-05 19:05:00 +++$+++ 1.204772700E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, I figured I'd message you about [[User talk:206.183.158.226|this vandal(s)]] since you left a final warning message on their talk page just last month - there is still vandalism coming from this shared account - is it frequent enough to block or report?  +++$+++ Hi Tim, I figured I'd message you about [[User talk:206.183.158.226|this vandal(s)]] since you left a final warning message on their talk page just last month - there is still vandalism coming from this shared account - is it frequent enough to block or report? [[User:Ciar|<font color="#9F1D35">'''~ Ciar ~'''</font>]] [[User_Talk:Ciar|<font color="DarkViolet"><sub>'''(Talk to me!)'''</sub></font>]] 19:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
545003 +++$+++ Ciar +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545002 +++$+++ 545002 +++$+++ 2008-03-05 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.204773000E09 +++$+++ Thanks ~ you're fast :o)  +++$+++ :Thanks ~ you're fast :o) [[User:Ciar|<font color="#9F1D35">'''~ Ciar ~'''</font>]] [[User_Talk:Ciar|<font color="DarkViolet"><sub>'''(Talk to me!)'''</sub></font>]] 19:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

20718 +++$+++ Rcbutcher +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-03 12:37:00 +++$+++ 1.309721820E09 +++$+++ regards, Rod.  +++$+++ regards, Rod. [[User:Rcbutcher|Rcbutcher]] ([[User talk:Rcbutcher|talk]]) 12:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
20719 +++$+++ Rcbutcher +++$+++ Sandpiper +++$+++ 20718 +++$+++ 20718 +++$+++ 2011-07-09 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.310205780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the detailed analysis. I realise with current webpage designs it's difficult to know where the user is focussing in the text.... but that to me is symptomatic of the current weakness - the webpage needs to interact more with the user rather than just slap a static page on the screen. Dunno how to at present... for a start we can assume that the user scrolls so that the centre of the screen is where they are reading. We then have a floating graphic e.g. map, which varies its content to match the text at centre of screen. The use will quickly understand what is happening as the graphic content changes with page scrolling. Example : Battle of Jutland, Midway etc. only make any sense in terms oif the fast movement of a large number of actors over a very large area : capital ships racing about at 25 knots, destroyers at 30+ knots, and squadrons of aircraft at Midway. We have good detailed texts on Wiki describing the key actions, but it's crippled by static content. A dynamic gif hovering and varying as the user scrolls down the text of e.g. the Run to the South, or Jellicoe finally crossing the T at Jutland would improve the user experience immensely. I know university libraries are looking into these kinds of ideas for distance education. I have used Javascript in the past to dynamically change images presented in a window, so at a very simple level if we create say 10 versions of a map showing positions during an action, we can use e.g. scrolling to trigger Javascript to reload the image.. or use a Java applet. Early days yet, but maybe we can set up a Wiki focus group to share ideas ?  +++$+++ :Thanks for the detailed analysis. I realise with current webpage designs it's difficult to know where the user is focussing in the text.... but that to me is symptomatic of the current weakness - the webpage needs to interact more with the user rather than just slap a static page on the screen. Dunno how to at present... for a start we can assume that the user scrolls so that the centre of the screen is where they are reading. We then have a floating graphic e.g. map, which varies its content to match the text at centre of screen. The use will quickly understand what is happening as the graphic content changes with page scrolling. Example : Battle of Jutland, Midway etc. only make any sense in terms oif the fast movement of a large number of actors over a very large area : capital ships racing about at 25 knots, destroyers at 30+ knots, and squadrons of aircraft at Midway. We have good detailed texts on Wiki describing the key actions, but it's crippled by static content. A dynamic gif hovering and varying as the user scrolls down the text of e.g. the Run to the South, or Jellicoe finally crossing the T at Jutland would improve the user experience immensely. I know university libraries are looking into these kinds of ideas for distance education. I have used Javascript in the past to dynamically change images presented in a window, so at a very simple level if we create say 10 versions of a map showing positions during an action, we can use e.g. scrolling to trigger Javascript to reload the image.. or use a Java applet. Early days yet, but maybe we can set up a Wiki focus group to share ideas ? [[User:Rcbutcher|Rcbutcher]] ([[User talk:Rcbutcher#top|talk]]) 03:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

20720 +++$+++  +++$+++ Cosprings +++$+++ 20720 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-07 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.307446620E09 +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Abby McDeere]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Abby McDeere]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 04:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
20721 +++$+++  +++$+++ Cosprings +++$+++ 20720 +++$+++ 20720 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 04:37:00 +++$+++ 1.307446620E09 +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Mitch McDeere]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ :[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Mitch McDeere]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 04:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
20722 +++$+++  +++$+++ Cosprings +++$+++ 20720 +++$+++ 20720 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 04:39:00 +++$+++ 1.307446740E09 +++$+++ [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Template:The Firm (series)]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]\/[[Special:Contributions\/TonyTheTiger|C]]\/ +++$+++ :[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Template:The Firm (series)]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 04:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

545012 +++$+++ Tanthalas39 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545012 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-11 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.205295180E09 +++$+++ I choked on my own spit, I was laughing so hard  +++$+++ I choked on my own spit, I was laughing so hard [[User:Tanthalas39|Tanthalas39]] ([[User talk:Tanthalas39|talk]]) 21:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
545013 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545012 +++$+++ 545012 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.205295240E09 +++$+++ :)  +++$+++ : :) [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 21:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

282869 +++$+++ Lear's Fool +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282869 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-26 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.290780300E09 +++$+++ Hi John, you left a note on my talkpage regarding [[Trilokinath Temple at Tunde]].  I was just wondering whether you've ever considered requesting the [[WP:Autopatrolled|Autopatrolled]] userright.  You're article creation record is formidable, and I'm sure you wouldn't have any problems receiving it if [[Wikipedia:Requests for permissions\/Autopatrolled|you asked]].  With that right, you may avoid situations like the one with [[Trilokinath Temple at Tunde]].&nbsp; -- ''''' +++$+++ Hi John, you left a note on my talkpage regarding [[Trilokinath Temple at Tunde]].  I was just wondering whether you've ever considered requesting the [[WP:Autopatrolled|Autopatrolled]] userright.  You're article creation record is formidable, and I'm sure you wouldn't have any problems receiving it if [[Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled|you asked]].  With that right, you may avoid situations like the one with [[Trilokinath Temple at Tunde]].&nbsp; -- '''''[[User:Lear's Fool|Lear's]] [[User Talk:Lear's Fool|Fool]]''''' 06:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
282870 +++$+++ Lear's Fool (Mobile) +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282869 +++$+++ 282869 +++$+++ 2010-11-26 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.290804900E09 +++$+++ No problem, keep up the good work!&nbsp; -- '''''[[User:Lear's Fool|Lear's]] [[User Talk:Lear's Fool|Fool]]''''' <sub> +++$+++ :No problem, keep up the good work!&nbsp; -- '''''[[User:Lear's Fool|Lear's]] [[User Talk:Lear's Fool|Fool]]''''' <sub>[[User:Lear's Fool (Mobile)|mobile]]</sub> 12:55, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

545014 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-11 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.205295960E09 +++$+++ I'm not quite sure what you changed, but it looks good to me. You should probably overwrite the old photo with the new one though. Thanks Tim,  +++$+++ I'm not quite sure what you changed, but it looks good to me. You should probably overwrite the old photo with the new one though. Thanks Tim, [[User:VanTucky|'''Van''']][[User talk:VanTucky|<span style="color:#FF4F00">'''Tucky'''</span>]] 21:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
545015 +++$+++ Brunton +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545014 +++$+++ 545014 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.205305560E09 +++$+++ Dana has been editing at least one of those pages without reference to the talk page (and with what appears to be an inaccurate edit summary in this case), for example here[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=James_Manby_Gully&diff=197134624&oldid=197095940].  See the Talk:James Manby Gully page under the heading \"Gully's use of homeopathy AND water-cure\".  This may be why edits were reverted.  I found this user talk page because I was wondering why the protection tag had been applied, by the way.  +++$+++ :Dana has been editing at least one of those pages without reference to the talk page (and with what appears to be an inaccurate edit summary in this case), for example here[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Manby_Gully&diff=197134624&oldid=197095940].  See the Talk:James Manby Gully page under the heading "Gully's use of homeopathy AND water-cure".  This may be why edits were reverted.  I found this user talk page because I was wondering why the protection tag had been applied, by the way. [[User:Brunton|Brunton]] ([[User talk:Brunton|talk]]) 00:06, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
545016 +++$+++ Jossi +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545014 +++$+++ 545015 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.205306160E09 +++$+++ FYI, most if not all these anons were editing from open proxies (TOR) and have been now blocked.  +++$+++ ::FYI, most if not all these anons were editing from open proxies (TOR) and have been now blocked. [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 00:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
545017 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545014 +++$+++ 545014 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.205306460E09 +++$+++ Thanks Jossi, I've let Dana know.  +++$+++ :Thanks Jossi, I've let Dana know. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 00:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
545018 +++$+++ DanaUllman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545014 +++$+++ 545017 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.205307840E09 +++$+++ Thanx...it is good to know that my instincts are right and that I'm not being paranoid (in other words, I was being followed).   +++$+++ ::Thanx...it is good to know that my instincts are right and that I'm not being paranoid (in other words, I was being followed).  [[User:DanaUllman|DanaUllman]]<sup>[[User talk:DanaUllman|Talk]]</sup> 00:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

20730 +++$+++ Bduke +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-13 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.263444180E09 +++$+++ Let us keep the discussion here, so it is in one place. Your talk page is on my watch list, so I see your edits here. I have therefore moved the following from my talk page and replied here: -- +++$+++ Let us keep the discussion here, so it is in one place. Your talk page is on my watch list, so I see your edits here. I have therefore moved the following from my talk page and replied here: --[[User:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''Bduke'''</span>]]  [[User_talk:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''(Discussion)'''</span>]] 20:43, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
20731 +++$+++ Bduke +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-13 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.263444180E09 +++$+++ the court cases are well covered in the \"controversies\" article and in their own articles. As to \"facts\", wikipedia is not about facts. We just report what others say. -- +++$+++ ::the court cases are well covered in the "controversies" article and in their own articles. As to "facts", wikipedia is not about facts. We just report what others say. --[[User:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''Bduke'''</span>]]  [[User_talk:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''(Discussion)'''</span>]] 20:43, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
20732 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-13 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.263451680E09 +++$+++ I'm trying to figure out what you meant by saying that Wikipedia doesn't cover facts, just what others say. Of course I understand that it covers sourced material, but I would think that the end result is that it covers factual material.   +++$+++ :::I'm trying to figure out what you meant by saying that Wikipedia doesn't cover facts, just what others say. Of course I understand that it covers sourced material, but I would think that the end result is that it covers factual material.  [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 22:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
20733 +++$+++ Bduke +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-13 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.263444180E09 +++$+++ You say \"they are mostly people who sincerely arrived at a  very negative mis-impression of BSA in these areas\". I think you are quite wrong. Many deletion votes came from active BSA leaders and other wikipedians like myself who are are active in the Scouting Wikiproject. That project seeks to give the best coverage of Scouting in the wikipedia way. We did not see your article as helping that goal, as it was an unhelpful fork of an article that is a FA yet one that is difficult to maintain. BTW, when I looked yesterday, the FA review of the \"controversies\" article, which was requested by the then coordinator of the Scouting Project, not by a critic of it, had attracted no comment. -- +++$+++ ::You say "they are mostly people who sincerely arrived at a  very negative mis-impression of BSA in these areas". I think you are quite wrong. Many deletion votes came from active BSA leaders and other wikipedians like myself who are are active in the Scouting Wikiproject. That project seeks to give the best coverage of Scouting in the wikipedia way. We did not see your article as helping that goal, as it was an unhelpful fork of an article that is a FA yet one that is difficult to maintain. BTW, when I looked yesterday, the FA review of the "controversies" article, which was requested by the then coordinator of the Scouting Project, not by a critic of it, had attracted no comment. --[[User:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''Bduke'''</span>]]  [[User_talk:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''(Discussion)'''</span>]] 20:43, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
20734 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-13 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.263451680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the insight.  As an aside, you'll note was what I said is \"I really don't know\" and that that was just my first guess.  My guess was from trying to interpret what I was reading, mostly from folks other than yourself, with some being from overseas.  And I was thinking that gay issues are so non-existent in everyday scouting that even 90% of the folks in Scouting don't understand the gay\/BSA situation, and that so it would be absolutely hopeless for someone from overseas to understand the situation, and so easy to gain a misunderstanding, which seemed evident in their choice of words, like they were doing battle with evil.   +++$+++ ::: Thanks for the insight.  As an aside, you'll note was what I said is "I really don't know" and that that was just my first guess.  My guess was from trying to interpret what I was reading, mostly from folks other than yourself, with some being from overseas.  And I was thinking that gay issues are so non-existent in everyday scouting that even 90% of the folks in Scouting don't understand the gay/BSA situation, and that so it would be absolutely hopeless for someone from overseas to understand the situation, and so easy to gain a misunderstanding, which seemed evident in their choice of words, like they were doing battle with evil.  [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 22:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
20735 +++$+++ Bduke +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-14 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.263478740E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm from Australia, but I have followed the 3Gs (God, Gays and Girls) for 20 years or so. The internet is amazing. -- +++$+++ :::: Well, I'm from Australia, but I have followed the 3Gs (God, Gays and Girls) for 20 years or so. The internet is amazing. --[[User:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''Bduke'''</span>]]  [[User_talk:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''(Discussion)'''</span>]] 06:19, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
20736 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.263599100E09 +++$+++ You are right.  We'll see where this goes.   +++$+++ ::::: You are right.  We'll see where this goes.  [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 15:45, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
20737 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20730 +++$+++ 20730 +++$+++ 2010-01-13 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.263419280E09 +++$+++ I was brought into this and it appears that it was a total waste of time. I'm not sure, but I think that I will drop out of any further effort in Wikipedia in this area. Thanks again for the note.  +++$+++ :I was brought into this and it appears that it was a total waste of time. I'm not sure, but I think that I will drop out of any further effort in Wikipedia in this area. Thanks again for the note. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000|talk]]) 13:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
20738 +++$+++ Bduke +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20730 +++$+++ 20737 +++$+++ 2010-01-13 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.263444180E09 +++$+++ I hope you will not drop out, but develop to be a valuable member of the Scouting Project. Good luck, anyway. -- +++$+++ ::I hope you will not drop out, but develop to be a valuable member of the Scouting Project. Good luck, anyway. --[[User:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''Bduke'''</span>]]  [[User_talk:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''(Discussion)'''</span>]] 20:43, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
20739 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20730 +++$+++ 20738 +++$+++ 2010-01-13 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.263451680E09 +++$+++ Thank you for saying that.  If I found a place to contribute that didn't involve a huge amount of unpleasant arm wrestling, I think I'd still be happy to do it.  +++$+++ :::Thank you for saying that.  If I found a place to contribute that didn't involve a huge amount of unpleasant arm wrestling, I think I'd still be happy to do it. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 22:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

545021 +++$+++ ClockworkSoul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-12 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.205375280E09 +++$+++ Just wondering if you happened to see the [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Molecular_and_Cellular_Biology#State_of_Igor|Igor update]] I posted to WP:MCB talk? &ndash;  +++$+++ Just wondering if you happened to see the [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Molecular_and_Cellular_Biology#State_of_Igor|Igor update]] I posted to WP:MCB talk? &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 19:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
545022 +++$+++ ClockworkSoul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545021 +++$+++ 545021 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.205379420E09 +++$+++ The only features list is what I've posted on the MCB talk page so far. I'm a bit frustrated with trying to get the page update post to work, so I think I'll take a break and whip up an Igor information page right now. &ndash;  +++$+++ :The only features list is what I've posted on the MCB talk page so far. I'm a bit frustrated with trying to get the page update post to work, so I think I'll take a break and whip up an Igor information page right now. &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 20:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
545023 +++$+++ ClockworkSoul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545021 +++$+++ 545022 +++$+++ 2008-03-12 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.205384040E09 +++$+++ Take a look [[User:ClockworkSoul\/Igor|here]]. I hope this clarifies things a bit! Cheers! &ndash;  +++$+++ ::Take a look [[User:ClockworkSoul/Igor|here]]. I hope this clarifies things a bit! Cheers! &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 21:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

282878 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-28 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.293528420E09 +++$+++ by any chance would you have any local books that might mention it at all? that might confirm or deny?  - thanks if you can - cheers -  +++$+++ by any chance would you have any local books that might mention it at all? that might confirm or deny?  - thanks if you can - cheers - [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 01:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
282879 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282878 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-28 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.293550920E09 +++$+++ Thank you ''very much'' for what you have done for Albany Island - do you hold any hope for ''Manar'' ?  +++$+++ ::Thank you ''very much'' for what you have done for Albany Island - do you hold any hope for ''Manar'' ? [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 07:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
282880 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282878 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-28 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.293551400E09 +++$+++ although I cannot claim any expertise whatseoever in any way the area - I strongly suspect either a local aboriginal term, or a Broken - torres creole origin for the word manar - and for whatever their wisdom - the geographic names (usually nomenclature advisory boards) people found some reason for exclusion some time back for it not to be picked up in the usual suspect locations at the Afd  +++$+++ ::although I cannot claim any expertise whatseoever in any way the area - I strongly suspect either a local aboriginal term, or a Broken - torres creole origin for the word manar - and for whatever their wisdom - the geographic names (usually nomenclature advisory boards) people found some reason for exclusion some time back for it not to be picked up in the usual suspect locations at the Afd [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 07:50, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
282881 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282878 +++$+++ 282878 +++$+++ 2010-12-28 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.293552360E09 +++$+++ No need for thanks - I am glad you brought it to my attention. As you can see, I have been researching the area a bit since your first note. It is many years since I was up there, but I do have a few books and old papers on the region as my wife and I once spent a year doing an economic development study of Cape York Peninsula and the Torres Strait. I haven't turned up anything on \"Manar\" yet and, like you, I suspect it is local term for this small group of small islands. If so, it may not be \"notable\" enough to justify a WP article. I thought I would phone a few friends tomorrow as well as the Torres Shire Council to see if I can find anything more of interest. Will certainly let you know if and when I do. Cheers,  +++$+++ :No need for thanks - I am glad you brought it to my attention. As you can see, I have been researching the area a bit since your first note. It is many years since I was up there, but I do have a few books and old papers on the region as my wife and I once spent a year doing an economic development study of Cape York Peninsula and the Torres Strait. I haven't turned up anything on "Manar" yet and, like you, I suspect it is local term for this small group of small islands. If so, it may not be "notable" enough to justify a WP article. I thought I would phone a few friends tomorrow as well as the Torres Shire Council to see if I can find anything more of interest. Will certainly let you know if and when I do. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 08:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
282882 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282878 +++$+++ 282881 +++$+++ 2010-12-28 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.293552720E09 +++$+++ You are very kind to go to the trouble - I find the whole torres island set of articles and categories in need of help - I am (my geographical knowledge from first hand) a central javanese, western tasmanian and south west western australian at heart - so this is new territory - please excuse me if i have in any way created anything cat or article wise that might seem odd - please correct where appropriate - thanks -  +++$+++ ::You are very kind to go to the trouble - I find the whole torres island set of articles and categories in need of help - I am (my geographical knowledge from first hand) a central javanese, western tasmanian and south west western australian at heart - so this is new territory - please excuse me if i have in any way created anything cat or article wise that might seem odd - please correct where appropriate - thanks - [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 08:12, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

282883 +++$+++ SatuSuro +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282883 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-04 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.294176360E09 +++$+++ Any news yet?  I have no problem with it going to adolphus channel article  +++$+++ Any news yet?  I have no problem with it going to adolphus channel article [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 13:26, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
282884 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282883 +++$+++ 282883 +++$+++ 2011-01-04 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.294213620E09 +++$+++ Hi again! No, I have not found anyone who knows it as Manar. It is such a small group of islands anyway - I think putting it in with the Adolphus Channel article is a good idea too. Thanks so much for the work and thought you have given to it all. Cheers and best wishes for 2011.  +++$+++ :Hi again! No, I have not found anyone who knows it as Manar. It is such a small group of islands anyway - I think putting it in with the Adolphus Channel article is a good idea too. Thanks so much for the work and thought you have given to it all. Cheers and best wishes for 2011. [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 23:47, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

282885 +++$+++ Abubakr Khalidi +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-18 08:26:00 +++$+++ 1.295367960E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Abubakr Khalidi|Abubakr Khalidi]] ([[User talk:Abubakr Khalidi|talk]]) 08:26, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
282886 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282885 +++$+++ 282885 +++$+++ 2011-01-18 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.295370540E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, no one knows for sure what language the names Kanishka and Kushan came from, although there has been much speculation. The Chinese used Guishuang for Kushan but, beyond that I am unable to say much - at least so far. All best wishes,  +++$+++ :Unfortunately, no one knows for sure what language the names Kanishka and Kushan came from, although there has been much speculation. The Chinese used Guishuang for Kushan but, beyond that I am unable to say much - at least so far. All best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 09:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

20742 +++$+++ WhatamIdoing +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20742 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-13 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.268477700E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to say thanks for your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research&diff=349536132&oldid=349535730 balanced comment] at [[WT:NOR]].  It's always helpful to have editors keeping straightforward good sense in the conversation, so that contentious discussions don't degenerate into two extreme positions.   +++$+++ Just wanted to say thanks for your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research&diff=349536132&oldid=349535730 balanced comment] at [[WT:NOR]].  It's always helpful to have editors keeping straightforward good sense in the conversation, so that contentious discussions don't degenerate into two extreme positions.  [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 02:55, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
20743 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20742 +++$+++ 20742 +++$+++ 2010-03-13 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.268480100E09 +++$+++ My Pleasure.   +++$+++ :My Pleasure.  [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 03:35, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

282887 +++$+++ Sikh-history +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-27 14:06:00 +++$+++ 1.296165960E09 +++$+++ Hi Fellow editor, on a recent edit summary you deleted some material because you feared it woul \"upset\" some people. I would like to remind you that as editors we should [[WP:Be Bold]]. Unless it is degrading, insulting, defemating or libelous, we should not be scared to include information that merely \"upsets\" people. I say this because I have been the target of abuse from editors because they deem that their particular group has a certain status. If there is anything you learn about Indians, it is that almost all of them believe themselves to be [[Kshatriya]], and they get upset when you do not agree. I think we should fight these hang ups (my own group is included in this btw). Any views? Thanks-- +++$+++ Hi Fellow editor, on a recent edit summary you deleted some material because you feared it woul "upset" some people. I would like to remind you that as editors we should [[WP:Be Bold]]. Unless it is degrading, insulting, defemating or libelous, we should not be scared to include information that merely "upsets" people. I say this because I have been the target of abuse from editors because they deem that their particular group has a certain status. If there is anything you learn about Indians, it is that almost all of them believe themselves to be [[Kshatriya]], and they get upset when you do not agree. I think we should fight these hang ups (my own group is included in this btw). Any views? Thanks--[[User:Sikh-history|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue;font-size:16px">Sikh-</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:goldenrod;font-size:16px">History</em>]] 14:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
282888 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282887 +++$+++ 282887 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.296196200E09 +++$+++ Also, I believe that the caste system is gradually breaking down and I try not to contribute to people digging their heels in over caste issues. Additionally, I think that saying whether a caste is a caste of peasants, warriors or \"royals\" is, fortunately, becoming increasing irrelevant in the modern world as we find people of all castes (and casteless people as well) taking up and working in roles completely unthinkable just a few decades ago. This, I believe is an extremely positive development, and one which may allow India to be a much fairer and happier society and allow millions to lead far more fulfilling lives. Certainly Jats are found working in practically every possible occupation these days. So, to refer to them as a \"peasant caste\" is becoming not only more and more irrelevant, but actually serves mostly to cause division and bad feeling. Perhaps a way around this would be to put things in the past tense. For example, it might be possible in the article to say (without, hopefully, starting another bitter feud) that Jats were previously considered to belong to a peasant caste. I would very much appreciate your thoughts on all this. Many thanks for bringing it up. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Also, I believe that the caste system is gradually breaking down and I try not to contribute to people digging their heels in over caste issues. Additionally, I think that saying whether a caste is a caste of peasants, warriors or "royals" is, fortunately, becoming increasing irrelevant in the modern world as we find people of all castes (and casteless people as well) taking up and working in roles completely unthinkable just a few decades ago. This, I believe is an extremely positive development, and one which may allow India to be a much fairer and happier society and allow millions to lead far more fulfilling lives. Certainly Jats are found working in practically every possible occupation these days. So, to refer to them as a "peasant caste" is becoming not only more and more irrelevant, but actually serves mostly to cause division and bad feeling. Perhaps a way around this would be to put things in the past tense. For example, it might be possible in the article to say (without, hopefully, starting another bitter feud) that Jats were previously considered to belong to a peasant caste. I would very much appreciate your thoughts on all this. Many thanks for bringing it up. Sincerely, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:30, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
282889 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282887 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-27 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.296198660E09 +++$+++ PS. About the use of [[Encyclopedia Britannica]]: As it is, like WP, a secondary source, it should be used with great caution - especially on contentious issues. Furthermore, aa it is in competition with WP, I prefer not to use it as a source unless others are not available. Cheers,  +++$+++ :::PS. About the use of [[Encyclopedia Britannica]]: As it is, like WP, a secondary source, it should be used with great caution - especially on contentious issues. Furthermore, aa it is in competition with WP, I prefer not to use it as a source unless others are not available. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 23:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

20744 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20744 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-01 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.270157520E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your message. I'll respond fully on my talk page in a short while (just leaving work).  +++$+++ Thank you for your message. I'll respond fully on my talk page in a short while (just leaving work). [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 14:32, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
20745 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20744 +++$+++ 20744 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.270167480E09 +++$+++ [[User_talk:EyeSerene#Traveler.27s_Dream_AFD|Detailed response at my talk page]]. Best,  +++$+++ :[[User_talk:EyeSerene#Traveler.27s_Dream_AFD|Detailed response at my talk page]]. Best, [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 17:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
20746 +++$+++ EyeSerene +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20744 +++$+++ 20744 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.270189500E09 +++$+++ Article userfied at [[User:North8000\/Sandbox]]. I've removed the categories and templates because they're for mainspace use only, and tagged the article so other editors know it's a work in progress (though you can remove that tag if you want to). The picture license is fine for userspace so I haven't touched that (non-free images can only be used in mainspace, but that doesn't apply here). All the best with the article's further development. [[User:EyeSerene|<span style=\"font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082\">EyeSerene<\/span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style=\"color:#6B8E23\">talk<\/span>]]<\/sup> 23:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC) Also deleted [[User:North8000\/TD BU]] per your request.  +++$+++ *Article userfied at [[User:North8000/Sandbox]]. I've removed the categories and templates because they're for mainspace use only, and tagged the article so other editors know it's a work in progress (though you can remove that tag if you want to). The picture license is fine for userspace so I haven't touched that (non-free images can only be used in mainspace, but that doesn't apply here). All the best with the article's further development. [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 23:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC) Also deleted [[User:North8000/TD BU]] per your request. [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 23:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

309292 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309292 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-28 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.248848880E09 +++$+++ I strongly suggest you withdraw Orchids from FAC.  It is impossible for me, in any event, to continue to deal with it the way things are going now. It is unseemly to be making these picayune  changes at this point. I have withdrawn my support from the FAC for now. I do not like what is happening. I do not agree with the points being made and can no longer continue working on the article. I am very sorry, but it is painful to me to see what is happening.  Regards,  &mdash; +++$+++ I strongly suggest you withdraw Orchids from FAC.  It is impossible for me, in any event, to continue to deal with it the way things are going now. It is unseemly to be making these picayune  changes at this point. I have withdrawn my support from the FAC for now. I do not like what is happening. I do not agree with the points being made and can no longer continue working on the article. I am very sorry, but it is painful to me to see what is happening.  Regards,  &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
309293 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309292 +++$+++ 309292 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.248928560E09 +++$+++ Are you about to overlay [[Fertilisation of Orchids]] with another version? Am I wasting my time on the current version? I am quite confused about what is going on. Regards, &mdash; +++$+++ :Are you about to overlay [[Fertilisation of Orchids]] with another version? Am I wasting my time on the current version? I am quite confused about what is going on. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 21:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
309294 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309292 +++$+++ 309293 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.248932820E09 +++$+++ Have tried to clarify on your talk page, I'm not changing anything without agreement, and if changes are made they will incorporate all current improvements, and will not be an overlay or just be pasted in from the rough drafts I've done purely to illustrate the possibilities. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::Have tried to clarify on your talk page, I'm not changing anything without agreement, and if changes are made they will incorporate all current improvements, and will not be an overlay or just be pasted in from the rough drafts I've done purely to illustrate the possibilities. Thanks, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
309295 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309292 +++$+++ 309294 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.248932940E09 +++$+++ I have made some improvements (in my opinion) in the sections you are thinking of moving and changing, which I hope you will consider and not just overwrite, as I removed redundant wording, added wikilinks etc. &mdash; +++$+++ :::I have made some improvements (in my opinion) in the sections you are thinking of moving and changing, which I hope you will consider and not just overwrite, as I removed redundant wording, added wikilinks etc. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
309296 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309292 +++$+++ 309295 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.248933360E09 +++$+++ I've considered them, they look good to me and won't just be overwritten. The possible change to integrate the \"background\" biography into the \"insect fertilisation\" section is aimed at meeting your concern about the writing quality, if you don't like it then I'm glad to leave it alone: the reuniting of the move to Downe with Orchis Bank is purely a move of paragraphs, and your latest wording would be kept. That's the one I think more significant for writing quality, again if you'd rather leave it as it is, no problem. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::::I've considered them, they look good to me and won't just be overwritten. The possible change to integrate the "background" biography into the "insect fertilisation" section is aimed at meeting your concern about the writing quality, if you don't like it then I'm glad to leave it alone: the reuniting of the move to Downe with Orchis Bank is purely a move of paragraphs, and your latest wording would be kept. That's the one I think more significant for writing quality, again if you'd rather leave it as it is, no problem. Thanks, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 22:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
309297 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309292 +++$+++ 309293 +++$+++ 2009-07-30 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.249013040E09 +++$+++ Aaagh! Silly me, have tried rephrasing that more sensibly. Think I'm finished with the proposed changes now. .  +++$+++ ::Aaagh! Silly me, have tried rephrasing that more sensibly. Think I'm finished with the proposed changes now. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

20748 +++$+++ Bob K31416 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20748 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-17 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.271488440E09 +++$+++ Hi. Were you directing your [[WT:NOR]] comment towards me or to someone else? One reason I ask is because of the indentation of your comment which might mean that you are responding to someone else's comment above mine. Regards, -- +++$+++ Hi. Were you directing your [[WT:NOR]] comment towards me or to someone else? One reason I ask is because of the indentation of your comment which might mean that you are responding to someone else's comment above mine. Regards, --[[User:Bob K31416|Bob K31416]] ([[User talk:Bob K31416|talk]]) 00:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
20749 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20748 +++$+++ 20748 +++$+++ 2010-04-17 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.271524860E09 +++$+++ I just indented on \"autopilot\" without thinking.   I meant it as a general inquiry for anybody to answer.  Sorry  +++$+++ :I just indented on "autopilot" without thinking.   I meant it as a general inquiry for anybody to answer.  Sorry [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 10:21, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
20750 +++$+++ Bob K31416 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20748 +++$+++ 20749 +++$+++ 2010-04-17 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.271542440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for clarifying. Regards, -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for clarifying. Regards, --[[User:Bob K31416|Bob K31416]] ([[User talk:Bob K31416|talk]]) 15:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

20751 +++$+++ Scottperry +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-17 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.271564160E09 +++$+++ Hi North 8000,  I just had some ideas about how we might be able to get past this 'log-jam that seems to be at the WP:NOR talk page.  Please take a gander at my talk page at: [[User_talk:Scottperry#WT:NOR]] if you want, and let me know what you think there.<br> Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi North 8000,  I just had some ideas about how we might be able to get past this 'log-jam that seems to be at the WP:NOR talk page.  Please take a gander at my talk page at: [[User_talk:Scottperry#WT:NOR]] if you want, and let me know what you think there.<br> Thanks, [[User:Scottperry|Scott P.]] ([[User talk:Scottperry|talk]]) 21:16, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
20752 +++$+++ Scottperry +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20751 +++$+++ 20751 +++$+++ 2010-04-18 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.271650740E09 +++$+++ Hi North8000,  Thanks for your input over at my talk page.  I hope you don't mind, but I took the liberty of fixing a few minor typos in your entry over there.  If you get a chance, could you please make sure I did this correctly?   +++$+++ :Hi North8000,  Thanks for your input over at my talk page.  I hope you don't mind, but I took the liberty of fixing a few minor typos in your entry over there.  If you get a chance, could you please make sure I did this correctly?  [[User:Scottperry|Scott P.]] ([[User talk:Scottperry|talk]]) 21:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

282897 +++$+++  Yaksar +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282897 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-25 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.301037960E09 +++$+++ So I responded to your comment about the James R. Whelan DYK, which hopefully you can address. But also on a totally unrelated note (I realized I can just combine the two of these, I originally didn't notice it was your nom) I found a grammatical problem at your nomination for [[Joseph Lennox Pawan]], but proposed a solution that's hopefully acceptable. Thanks!-- +++$+++ So I responded to your comment about the James R. Whelan DYK, which hopefully you can address. But also on a totally unrelated note (I realized I can just combine the two of these, I originally didn't notice it was your nom) I found a grammatical problem at your nomination for [[Joseph Lennox Pawan]], but proposed a solution that's hopefully acceptable. Thanks!--[[User: Yaksar|Yaksar]] [[User talk: Yaksar|(let's chat)]] 00:26, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
282898 +++$+++  Yaksar +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282897 +++$+++ 282897 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.301054580E09 +++$+++ Well thank you! It's much appreciated, and your nom was definitely an interesting article to read. Is there any other issue that needs to be dealt with on the Whelan DYK, or is it possible that could be approved now? Thanks again! -- +++$+++ *Well thank you! It's much appreciated, and your nom was definitely an interesting article to read. Is there any other issue that needs to be dealt with on the Whelan DYK, or is it possible that could be approved now? Thanks again! --[[User: Yaksar|Yaksar]] [[User talk: Yaksar|(let's chat)]] 05:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

20754 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-24 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.272099360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 01:56, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
20755 +++$+++ Bob K31416 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20754 +++$+++ 20754 +++$+++ 2010-04-24 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.272105120E09 +++$+++ Off hand I can't recall an example of abuse but I do remember coming across some old editing which is a somewhat humorous example of an editor deleting something because the editor didn't understand the NOR policy. Here's the [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wilderness_acquired_diarrhea&action=historysubmit&diff=86660493&oldid=86022582 diff]. The editor deleted  material that came from a published source because it was original research. The discussion can be found [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Wilderness_acquired_diarrhea&oldid=198481905#Discussion here.] Note at the end of the discussion, an editor is defending the material against removal by saying that the published article is not original research because it contains sources. So there is an editor deleting material, an editor defending the material against deletion, and both editors don't understand the NOR policy. (Fortunately there is another editor there, actually an administrator, who understands the NOR policy.) -- +++$+++ :Off hand I can't recall an example of abuse but I do remember coming across some old editing which is a somewhat humorous example of an editor deleting something because the editor didn't understand the NOR policy. Here's the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wilderness_acquired_diarrhea&action=historysubmit&diff=86660493&oldid=86022582 diff]. The editor deleted  material that came from a published source because it was original research. The discussion can be found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wilderness_acquired_diarrhea&oldid=198481905#Discussion here.] Note at the end of the discussion, an editor is defending the material against removal by saying that the published article is not original research because it contains sources. So there is an editor deleting material, an editor defending the material against deletion, and both editors don't understand the NOR policy. (Fortunately there is another editor there, actually an administrator, who understands the NOR policy.) --[[User:Bob K31416|Bob K31416]] ([[User talk:Bob K31416|talk]]) 03:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

282899 +++$+++ Neduvelilmathew +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282899 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-27 09:06:00 +++$+++ 1.301241960E09 +++$+++ The ancient name of this port was MuciriPattanam. So I think the article, [[Pattanam]], be merged with this article Muziris. +++$+++ The ancient name of this port was MuciriPattanam. So I think the article, [[Pattanam]], be merged with this article Muziris.[[User:Neduvelilmathew|Neduvelilmathew]] ([[User talk:Neduvelilmathew|talk]]) 09:06, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
282900 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282899 +++$+++ 282899 +++$+++ 2011-04-02 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.301736360E09 +++$+++ Sorry to be so negative, but the history of the Jats does seem to me to be such a touchy subject that almost anything written about it is sure to enrage one group or another. But, best wishes, and I do hope you may be able to help heal wounds and work towards a genearally agreed and well-backed history for this large and influential and very diverse group\/caste\/race\/clan\/community, or whatever you like to call it. My own personal experiences with my Jat friends throughout my life has been wonderfully enriching and I have great admiration for the vast majority of Jats - but I must warn you that there are certainly some very angry and mean Jat fanatics out there. With all best wishes,  +++$+++ :Sorry to be so negative, but the history of the Jats does seem to me to be such a touchy subject that almost anything written about it is sure to enrage one group or another. But, best wishes, and I do hope you may be able to help heal wounds and work towards a genearally agreed and well-backed history for this large and influential and very diverse group/caste/race/clan/community, or whatever you like to call it. My own personal experiences with my Jat friends throughout my life has been wonderfully enriching and I have great admiration for the vast majority of Jats - but I must warn you that there are certainly some very angry and mean Jat fanatics out there. With all best wishes, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 02:26, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

282903 +++$+++ HXL49 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282903 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-24 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.303631700E09 +++$+++ Sorry, but I will interpret your addition of quotes, especially \"so-called\", to the term in that article as your own '''personal analysis''', and possibly subtle unnecessary POV (not pushing though). Also, where did you go to if you spent more than 30 continuous days in China? I rarely hear of American tourists (?) spending in excess of even 21 days in that land. --<small>HXL's<\/small> +++$+++ Sorry, but I will interpret your addition of quotes, especially "so-called", to the term in that article as your own '''personal analysis''', and possibly subtle unnecessary POV (not pushing though). Also, where did you go to if you spent more than 30 continuous days in China? I rarely hear of American tourists (?) spending in excess of even 21 days in that land. --<small>HXL's</small>[[User talk:HXL49|<span style="color:red"> Roundtable</span>]] <span style="color:red">and</span> '''[[Special:Contributions/HXL49|<span style="color:yellow">Record</span>]]''' 00:55, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
282904 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282903 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-24 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.303646400E09 +++$+++ I have been several times to China and together those trips add up to well over a month. Hope this answers your queries, Sincerely,  +++$+++ :*I have been several times to China and together those trips add up to well over a month. Hope this answers your queries, Sincerely, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 05:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

282905 +++$+++ Keahapana +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282905 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-26 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.303804980E09 +++$+++ Hi John, As the resident Jade Gate scholar, I wanted to ask your opinion about a Chinese publication. Both [[Chinese Buddhism]] and [[Silk Road transmission of Buddhism]] similarly claim that Qin Shihuang banned Buddhist temples, citing a recent article by Han Wei. This long-discredited interpretation, apparently first proposed by Fujita Toyohachi \u85e4\u7530\u4e30\u516b, phonetically reads \"Buddha\" for the auxiliary verb ''bude'' \u4e0d\u5f97 \"must not\" in the [[Shiji]]'s \u7981\u4e0d\u5f97\u7960, \"It was forbidden to offer sacrifices to the Morning Star\" (tr. Watson p. 53 [cribbed through Google Books]). I found [http:\/\/www.wuys.com\/news\/Article_Show.asp?ArticleID=6771 this] but can't find any English articles that dispute this bude=Buddha interpretation. Do you know of any reliable sources?  +++$+++ Hi John, As the resident Jade Gate scholar, I wanted to ask your opinion about a Chinese publication. Both [[Chinese Buddhism]] and [[Silk Road transmission of Buddhism]] similarly claim that Qin Shihuang banned Buddhist temples, citing a recent article by Han Wei. This long-discredited interpretation, apparently first proposed by Fujita Toyohachi 藤田丰八, phonetically reads "Buddha" for the auxiliary verb ''bude'' 不得 "must not" in the [[Shiji]]'s 禁不得祠, "It was forbidden to offer sacrifices to the Morning Star" (tr. Watson p. 53 [cribbed through Google Books]). I found [http://www.wuys.com/news/Article_Show.asp?ArticleID=6771 this] but can't find any English articles that dispute this bude=Buddha interpretation. Do you know of any reliable sources? [[User:Keahapana|Keahapana]] ([[User talk:Keahapana|talk]]) 01:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
282906 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282905 +++$+++ 282905 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.303826880E09 +++$+++ Hi again! What could possibly have induced people to believe that Qin Shihuang banned Buddhist temples? It seems so very unlikely there was any significant Buddhist influence in China at the time. Sorry, but all I can find is negative information. Perhaps the most convincing (for me) was that the 7-volume ''Grand Ricci'' Chinese to French dictionary, which was written by Jesuits and has every conceivable term relating to religions in it, gives only the usual interpretations for \u4e0d\u5f97. If they had ever ccome across even one example of it being used to indicate the Buddha they would surely have included it. I also went through old typewritten notes by Fr. Yves Raguin, S. J., on early religions in China, who for 40 years was head of the dictionary project (he died before it was completed), and found nary a mention of \u4e0d\u5f97. The same goes for several other references I checked. Apologies, though, for not finding any conclusive evidence. Good luck with it all. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Hi again! What could possibly have induced people to believe that Qin Shihuang banned Buddhist temples? It seems so very unlikely there was any significant Buddhist influence in China at the time. Sorry, but all I can find is negative information. Perhaps the most convincing (for me) was that the 7-volume ''Grand Ricci'' Chinese to French dictionary, which was written by Jesuits and has every conceivable term relating to religions in it, gives only the usual interpretations for 不得. If they had ever ccome across even one example of it being used to indicate the Buddha they would surely have included it. I also went through old typewritten notes by Fr. Yves Raguin, S. J., on early religions in China, who for 40 years was head of the dictionary project (he died before it was completed), and found nary a mention of 不得. The same goes for several other references I checked. Apologies, though, for not finding any conclusive evidence. Good luck with it all. Cheers, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 07:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
282907 +++$+++ Keahapana +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282905 +++$+++ 282906 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 02:24:00 +++$+++ 1.304155440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for checking. You're right to expect that the ''Grand Ricci'' would enter every known Chinese transcription of \"Buddha\". I'll post a discussion question on [[Silk Road transmission of Buddhism]] and see what happens. Cheers,  +++$+++ ::Thanks for checking. You're right to expect that the ''Grand Ricci'' would enter every known Chinese transcription of "Buddha". I'll post a discussion question on [[Silk Road transmission of Buddhism]] and see what happens. Cheers, [[User:Keahapana|Keahapana]] ([[User talk:Keahapana|talk]]) 02:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
282908 +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ John Hill +++$+++ 282905 +++$+++ 282906 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.303968960E09 +++$+++ My own position is that the Christian Era - even according to most Christian scholars - is not accurate in terms of when Jesus was born anyway, and people of other religions (or no religion) are often uncomfortable using abbreviations which mean \"before Christ\" (BC) or \"in the year of our Lord\" (AD). So I prefer to use the more neutral abbreviations, BCE and CE respectively. It seems to me that if we insist on BC and AD, we will have people wanting to use the Indian [[Saka Era]], the [[Muslim Era]], the [[Buddhist Era]], etc., instead of the Christian (or Common) era, which would cause huge confusion as the dates would all be different. But, this is just my personal view. Sorry for any misunderstanding. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :*My own position is that the Christian Era - even according to most Christian scholars - is not accurate in terms of when Jesus was born anyway, and people of other religions (or no religion) are often uncomfortable using abbreviations which mean "before Christ" (BC) or "in the year of our Lord" (AD). So I prefer to use the more neutral abbreviations, BCE and CE respectively. It seems to me that if we insist on BC and AD, we will have people wanting to use the Indian [[Saka Era]], the [[Muslim Era]], the [[Buddhist Era]], etc., instead of the Christian (or Common) era, which would cause huge confusion as the dates would all be different. But, this is just my personal view. Sorry for any misunderstanding. Sincerely, [[User:John Hill|John Hill]] ([[User talk:John Hill#top|talk]]) 22:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

20762 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20762 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-26 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.277544960E09 +++$+++ Hello Rlevse.   3\/4 Malamute, 1\/4 Siberian Husky, and it was taken behind my house. (have a large wooded lot). Adopted, \"Rocky\" was the name he came with.  Prior to that malamutes have been in our family for a long time.   I have other images pulling a sled and out in the woods and frozen lakes in Northern Minnesota and Northern Ontario on winter camping trips. I put it up when I was experimenting trying to learn Wikipedia images and then decided to throw it on my user page.   I haven't learned what PD and Commons are yet, but feel free to do whatever you wish with it. If you feel like it, let me know what happened with it.   Sincerely,  +++$+++ Hello Rlevse.   3/4 Malamute, 1/4 Siberian Husky, and it was taken behind my house. (have a large wooded lot). Adopted, "Rocky" was the name he came with.  Prior to that malamutes have been in our family for a long time.   I have other images pulling a sled and out in the woods and frozen lakes in Northern Minnesota and Northern Ontario on winter camping trips. I put it up when I was experimenting trying to learn Wikipedia images and then decided to throw it on my user page.   I haven't learned what PD and Commons are yet, but feel free to do whatever you wish with it. If you feel like it, let me know what happened with it.   Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 02:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
20763 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20762 +++$+++ 20762 +++$+++ 2010-06-26 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.277545560E09 +++$+++ So I will put the loc as Minnesota. PD is \"public domain\" which means you let anyone do what they want for free. CC variations and GFDL preserve some rights but are still \"free\" licenses meaning anyone can use them for free. Basically they mean you get credit for the photo. Commons is a wiki for media, mostly photos, that lets all WMF wiki projects use the photo without uploading to each separate wiki. Use the name as it is on commons and the photo will \"show through\" to the wiki you want to use the photo. See [[:File:WikiProject Scouting fleur-de-lis dark.svg]] which below the image has a link and note about its home wiki being Commons. See [[:File:Scouting 'round the World 1977 edition.jpg]] which is not on Commons.<span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :So I will put the loc as Minnesota. PD is "public domain" which means you let anyone do what they want for free. CC variations and GFDL preserve some rights but are still "free" licenses meaning anyone can use them for free. Basically they mean you get credit for the photo. Commons is a wiki for media, mostly photos, that lets all WMF wiki projects use the photo without uploading to each separate wiki. Use the name as it is on commons and the photo will "show through" to the wiki you want to use the photo. See [[:File:WikiProject Scouting fleur-de-lis dark.svg]] which below the image has a link and note about its home wiki being Commons. See [[:File:Scouting 'round the World 1977 edition.jpg]] which is not on Commons.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 02:46, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

545052 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545052 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-22 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.206246600E09 +++$+++ First, I'll get to passing Animal testing today. Sorry for the wait, I haven't been as quick at my GA reviews as I used to be. One other thing, I've semi-officially decided that [[Chicken]] will be my next endeavor (or endeavour, if you like). One basic preliminary question which I think you could answer better than I could (and one which most of the books I bought didn't comprehensively answer) is the taxonomy of the bird. Many give ''Gallus gallus'', but several also go with ''Gallus gallus domesticus'' or just ''Gallus domesticus''. Do you know which is the current favorite in scientific circles, or where the best place to find out is? Thanks a million Tim,  +++$+++ First, I'll get to passing Animal testing today. Sorry for the wait, I haven't been as quick at my GA reviews as I used to be. One other thing, I've semi-officially decided that [[Chicken]] will be my next endeavor (or endeavour, if you like). One basic preliminary question which I think you could answer better than I could (and one which most of the books I bought didn't comprehensively answer) is the taxonomy of the bird. Many give ''Gallus gallus'', but several also go with ''Gallus gallus domesticus'' or just ''Gallus domesticus''. Do you know which is the current favorite in scientific circles, or where the best place to find out is? Thanks a million Tim, [[User:VanTucky|'''Van''']][[User talk:VanTucky|<span style="color:#FF4F00">'''Tucky'''</span>]] 21:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
545053 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545052 +++$+++ 545052 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.206249420E09 +++$+++ Thanks! If this is true, we may want to correct [[Red Junglefowl]] (the parent species) then.  +++$+++ :Thanks! If this is true, we may want to correct [[Red Junglefowl]] (the parent species) then. [[User:VanTucky|'''Van''']][[User talk:VanTucky|<span style="color:#FF4F00">'''Tucky'''</span>]] 22:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
545054 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545052 +++$+++ 545052 +++$+++ 2008-03-22 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.206252000E09 +++$+++ I just passed Animal testing, congrats. Also, I put it in the Biology subsection at [[WP:GA]]. Feel free to move it if you want.  +++$+++ :I just passed Animal testing, congrats. Also, I put it in the Biology subsection at [[WP:GA]]. Feel free to move it if you want. [[User:VanTucky|'''Van''']][[User talk:VanTucky|<span style="color:#FF4F00">'''Tucky'''</span>]] 23:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

20765 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20765 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-27 12:22:00 +++$+++ 1.277666520E09 +++$+++ -For superior work in area of [[Scouting]] articles, especially the BSA controversies and high adventure articles.<span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ -For superior work in area of [[Scouting]] articles, especially the BSA controversies and high adventure articles.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 12:22, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
20766 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20765 +++$+++ 20765 +++$+++ 2010-06-27 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.277669820E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  I try.   Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Thanks!  I try.   Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 13:17, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
20767 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20765 +++$+++ 20765 +++$+++ 2010-07-02 10:30:00 +++$+++ 1.278091800E09 +++$+++ If you look at the talk page of any Scouting article, look at the Scouting Project tag. In the upper right-hand corner is a link to the Scouting Portal.<span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :If you look at the talk page of any Scouting article, look at the Scouting Project tag. In the upper right-hand corner is a link to the Scouting Portal.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 10:30, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

282911 +++$+++ Meelar +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282911 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-07-18 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.090156320E09 +++$+++ Hi. Just a note--be sure that the images aren't [[copyright]]ed; see [[Wikipedia:Copyrights]] for more.  That out of the way, what are you having problems with? Best, [[User:Meelar| +++$+++ Hi. Just a note--be sure that the images aren't [[copyright]]ed; see [[Wikipedia:Copyrights]] for more.  That out of the way, what are you having problems with? Best, [[User:Meelar|[[User:Meelar|Meelar]] [[User talk:Meelar|(talk)]]]] 06:12, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
282912 +++$+++ Meelar +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282911 +++$+++ 282911 +++$+++ 2004-07-18 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.090195080E09 +++$+++ Not sure why that would be.  I've copied your question to [[Wikipedia:Help desk]]; hopefully, somebody a little more computer-literate than me would know what's going on. Best wishes, [[User:Meelar| +++$+++ :Not sure why that would be.  I've copied your question to [[Wikipedia:Help desk]]; hopefully, somebody a little more computer-literate than me would know what's going on. Best wishes, [[User:Meelar|[[User:Meelar|Meelar]] [[User talk:Meelar|(talk)]]]] 16:58, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)

282913 +++$+++ Bodnotbod +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282913 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-07-21 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.090456260E09 +++$+++ What I tend to do, if I think someone is messing about, is look at their other contributions - you can then tell pretty quickly whether someone is acting in good or bad faith.  You mgiht want to consider taking up the habit before spreading your sarcasm. Cheers. -- +++$+++ What I tend to do, if I think someone is messing about, is look at their other contributions - you can then tell pretty quickly whether someone is acting in good or bad faith.  You mgiht want to consider taking up the habit before spreading your sarcasm. Cheers. --[[User:Bodnotbod|bodnotbod]] 17:31, Jul 21, 2004 (UTC)
282914 +++$+++ Bodnotbod +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282913 +++$+++ 282913 +++$+++ 2004-07-21 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.090460520E09 +++$+++ Fair enough.  ;o)  Buys you half a pint of lager.  Well, I'm on a budget.  -- +++$+++ :Fair enough.  ;o)  Buys you half a pint of lager.  Well, I'm on a budget.  --[[User:Bodnotbod|bodnotbod]] 18:42, Jul 21, 2004 (UTC)
282915 +++$+++ Bodnotbod +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282913 +++$+++ 282914 +++$+++ 2004-07-21 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.090463400E09 +++$+++ Yes, Napoleon is ''ongoing''.  Thing is, although it is amusing, it's also very relevant.  I think he believes in heroes.  I don't.  Well, not infallible ones, anyway.  But I confess that researching that section did make me laugh...  ;o)  -- +++$+++ ::Yes, Napoleon is ''ongoing''.  Thing is, although it is amusing, it's also very relevant.  I think he believes in heroes.  I don't.  Well, not infallible ones, anyway.  But I confess that researching that section did make me laugh...  ;o)  --[[User:Bodnotbod|bodnotbod]] 19:30, Jul 21, 2004 (UTC)

20773 +++$+++ SaltyBoatr +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20773 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-07 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.278533280E09 +++$+++ I would welcome your help mediating a solution to the impasse at the 2A page.  <span style=\"color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc;text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ I would welcome your help mediating a solution to the impasse at the 2A page.  <span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc;text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:SaltyBoatr|SaltyBoatr]]</span><sup>[[User_talk:SaltyBoatr| get]][[Special:Contributions/SaltyBoatr| wet]]</sup> 13:08, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
20774 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20773 +++$+++ 20773 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.278534180E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I'd be honored and will do it. I'm mostly out of commission today so it would be late tonight or tomorrow before you see anything. Should we have this same exchange on the 2A talk page?   Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Thanks.  I'd be honored and will do it. I'm mostly out of commission today so it would be late tonight or tomorrow before you see anything. Should we have this same exchange on the 2A talk page?   Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 13:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
20775 +++$+++ SaltyBoatr +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20773 +++$+++ 20774 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.278541380E09 +++$+++ Effective mediation of disagreements is an art form.  I have failed to find a path towards resolution of this dispute so, obviously, I am not the best person to ask as to how exactly to do this.  You might check with the mediation cabal for their ideas.  <span style=\"color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc;text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ ::Effective mediation of disagreements is an art form.  I have failed to find a path towards resolution of this dispute so, obviously, I am not the best person to ask as to how exactly to do this.  You might check with the mediation cabal for their ideas.  <span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc;text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:SaltyBoatr|SaltyBoatr]]</span><sup>[[User_talk:SaltyBoatr| get]][[Special:Contributions/SaltyBoatr| wet]]</sup> 15:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
20776 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20773 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.278565620E09 +++$+++ I have an idea. +++$+++ ::::  I have an idea.[[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 22:07, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
20777 +++$+++ Hauskalainen +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20773 +++$+++ 20775 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.278545340E09 +++$+++ Forgive me for intruding on your little t\xeat\xea \xe0 t\xeat\xea. I understand fully how the word \"cabal\" operates in this context, but not the word \"mediation\".  Mediation means two parties working with a third to resolve an issue. Given that I have declined (for obvious reasons) to be involved in this charade, its hard to see how it can still be called \"mediation\". -- +++$+++ :::Forgive me for intruding on your little têtê à têtê. I understand fully how the word "cabal" operates in this context, but not the word "mediation".  Mediation means two parties working with a third to resolve an issue. Given that I have declined (for obvious reasons) to be involved in this charade, its hard to see how it can still be called "mediation". --[[User:Hauskalainen|Hauskalainen]] ([[User talk:Hauskalainen|talk]]) 16:29, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
20778 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20773 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.278565620E09 +++$+++ Hauskalainen, not sure what you meant by charade, but in the areas where I was involved in the 2A discussion, you should note that me and Salty were opponents. +++$+++ ::::: Hauskalainen, not sure what you meant by charade, but in the areas where I was involved in the 2A discussion, you should note that me and Salty were opponents.[[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 22:07, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
20779 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20773 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.278572160E09 +++$+++ I don't see anywhere that you turned down mediation.  +++$+++ :::::: I don't see anywhere that you turned down mediation. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 23:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
20780 +++$+++ SaltyBoatr +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20773 +++$+++ 20777 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.278557520E09 +++$+++ No, the reasons you have declined mediation are not obvious.  There is a chance that inter'''mediatation''' might help find some middle ground that could be mutually agreeable.  We can't know unless we try.  <span style=\"color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc;text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml\"> +++$+++ ::::No, the reasons you have declined mediation are not obvious.  There is a chance that inter'''mediatation''' might help find some middle ground that could be mutually agreeable.  We can't know unless we try.  <span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc;text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:SaltyBoatr|SaltyBoatr]]</span><sup>[[User_talk:SaltyBoatr| get]][[Special:Contributions/SaltyBoatr| wet]]</sup> 19:52, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

545064 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545064 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.206621600E09 +++$+++ I can't believe you asked [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGordonUS&diff=201208386&oldid=201206711 this question].  I was thinking that he is a member of Stormfront.  Maybe you were serious?   +++$+++ I can't believe you asked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGordonUS&diff=201208386&oldid=201206711 this question].  I was thinking that he is a member of Stormfront.  Maybe you were serious?  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 05:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
545065 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545064 +++$+++ 545064 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.206661920E09 +++$+++ Do you realize the same tendentious and racist philosophy is being pushed at [[Race and intelligence]].  I'm trying to stay in fun articles, but you cannot believe how science is being twisted here, and I cannot stand aside.  It's frustrating.   +++$+++ :Do you realize the same tendentious and racist philosophy is being pushed at [[Race and intelligence]].  I'm trying to stay in fun articles, but you cannot believe how science is being twisted here, and I cannot stand aside.  It's frustrating.  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 16:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

282921 +++$+++ Ffirehorse +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-08-14 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.092476760E09 +++$+++ My hat's off to you. Fantastic job with the \"Jealous Guy\" article. I will see if I can find any other tidbits to add, but I doubt I could add much to what you've already done. Cheers.  +++$+++ My hat's off to you. Fantastic job with the "Jealous Guy" article. I will see if I can find any other tidbits to add, but I doubt I could add much to what you've already done. Cheers. [[User:Ffirehorse|ffirehorse]] 02:46, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
282922 +++$+++ Gaurav +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282921 +++$+++ 282921 +++$+++ 2005-02-15 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.108527720E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Original Barnstar.png|frame|This [[barnstar]] has been bestowed on [[User:Crestville]] for his splendid edits to [[Jealous Guy]], turning it from a stub piece to a beautifully introspective, fully fleshed out article. Kudos!]]A barnstar for the awesome job - you deserve it! [[Jealous Guy]] is the coolest Beatles entry I've seen on Wikipedia yet!  +++$+++ : [[Image:Original Barnstar.png|frame|This [[barnstar]] has been bestowed on [[User:Crestville]] for his splendid edits to [[Jealous Guy]], turning it from a stub piece to a beautifully introspective, fully fleshed out article. Kudos!]]A barnstar for the awesome job - you deserve it! [[Jealous Guy]] is the coolest Beatles entry I've seen on Wikipedia yet! [[User:Gaurav|Gaurav]] 20:22, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

545066 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545066 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-28 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.206765720E09 +++$+++ Please do not take the uncompromising tone of my comments personally. I know from the very little we've had to do with each other that you're a reasonable person. Unfortunately I also know that others are less reasonable, and what little experience I've had of dealing with them suggests the best way is show them up front where the line in the sand is.   +++$+++ Please do not take the uncompromising tone of my comments personally. I know from the very little we've had to do with each other that you're a reasonable person. Unfortunately I also know that others are less reasonable, and what little experience I've had of dealing with them suggests the best way is show them up front where the line in the sand is.  [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 21:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
545067 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545066 +++$+++ 545066 +++$+++ 2008-03-28 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.206766920E09 +++$+++ Your first link had nothing to do with me.  However, amusing to see that at least 5 different \"serious\" dinosaur editors think you need to chill out and read Wikipedia manual of styles.  In the second one, you are engaging in a fairly uncivil attack with a respected admin and editor.  I think you should be blocked for personal attacks, uncivil editing, and possibly tendentious editing.  I won't mention the poor writing skills, because we deal with that through allowing editors to help each other, which is not your MO.  So, I'm really done here.  Tim, do whatever you want, you're much nicer than I'll ever be.   +++$+++ *Your first link had nothing to do with me.  However, amusing to see that at least 5 different "serious" dinosaur editors think you need to chill out and read Wikipedia manual of styles.  In the second one, you are engaging in a fairly uncivil attack with a respected admin and editor.  I think you should be blocked for personal attacks, uncivil editing, and possibly tendentious editing.  I won't mention the poor writing skills, because we deal with that through allowing editors to help each other, which is not your MO.  So, I'm really done here.  Tim, do whatever you want, you're much nicer than I'll ever be.  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 22:02, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

282923 +++$+++ TheCustomOfLife +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-08-26 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.093510920E09 +++$+++ I don't care. I wasn't ever trying to be catty and I wasn't out to get you. Just wanted you to know that. :-)  +++$+++ I don't care. I wasn't ever trying to be catty and I wasn't out to get you. Just wanted you to know that. :-) [[User:TheCustomOfLife|Mike H]] 02:02, Aug 26, 2004 (UTC)
282924 +++$+++ TheCustomOfLife +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282923 +++$+++ 282923 +++$+++ 2004-08-30 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.093924500E09 +++$+++ I apologize as well. Thank you for the kind gesture.  +++$+++ :I apologize as well. Thank you for the kind gesture. [[User:TheCustomOfLife|Mike H]] 20:55, Aug 30, 2004 (UTC)

20781 +++$+++ Hauskalainen +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20781 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-08 10:17:00 +++$+++ 1.278609420E09 +++$+++ So there. -- +++$+++ So there. --[[User:Hauskalainen|Hauskalainen]] ([[User talk:Hauskalainen|talk]]) 10:17, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
20782 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20781 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-07-08 11:13:00 +++$+++ 1.278612780E09 +++$+++ What I meant was that I could not see where you turned down mediation in the 2A talk page.  Where was it?  But either way, you've now made it clear here.  BTW I have no relation to the mediation cabal.  Finally, I have not edited the article, but have edited about a dozen times on the talk page.   +++$+++ :: What I meant was that I could not see where you turned down mediation in the 2A talk page.  Where was it?  But either way, you've now made it clear here.  BTW I have no relation to the mediation cabal.  Finally, I have not edited the article, but have edited about a dozen times on the talk page.  [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 11:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

282926 +++$+++ TheCustomOfLife +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282926 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-09-05 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.094435640E09 +++$+++ You're allowed to vote for admin, as is any contributor. If you want to vote, type # and then four tildes to sign your name. Put your vote under all others. I appreciate that you want to vote for me. Thank you. :-)  +++$+++ You're allowed to vote for admin, as is any contributor. If you want to vote, type # and then four tildes to sign your name. Put your vote under all others. I appreciate that you want to vote for me. Thank you. :-) [[User:TheCustomOfLife|Mike H]] 18:54, Sep 5, 2004 (UTC)
282927 +++$+++ TheCustomOfLife +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282926 +++$+++ 282926 +++$+++ 2004-09-05 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.094437800E09 +++$+++ You're not offensive any more, mate. You've decided to put a good food forward and make amends, and I find that very commendable. Again, thanks for the vote.  +++$+++ :You're not offensive any more, mate. You've decided to put a good food forward and make amends, and I find that very commendable. Again, thanks for the vote. [[User:TheCustomOfLife|Mike H]] 19:30, Sep 5, 2004 (UTC)

20783 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20783 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-07 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.278572100E09 +++$+++ Unless anyone prefers otherwise, I'll copy this discussion to the 2A talk page and continue it there.   I think that it is relevant to the 2A discussion. Sincerely,  +++$+++ Unless anyone prefers otherwise, I'll copy this discussion to the 2A talk page and continue it there.   I think that it is relevant to the 2A discussion. Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 23:55, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
20784 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20783 +++$+++ 20783 +++$+++ 2010-07-10 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.278745860E09 +++$+++ I decided not to, and to put this idea on hold for the time being.  +++$+++ :I decided not to, and to put this idea on hold for the time being. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 00:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

282928 +++$+++ TheCustomOfLife +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-09-08 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.094695080E09 +++$+++ It depends. Did you get permission first for using the picture? If it's a screenshot of your entire desktop or a webpage, it can be argued that it's fair use, since you took the picture of the entire thing yourself. Again, it really does depend on what you're taking.  +++$+++ It depends. Did you get permission first for using the picture? If it's a screenshot of your entire desktop or a webpage, it can be argued that it's fair use, since you took the picture of the entire thing yourself. Again, it really does depend on what you're taking. [[User:TheCustomOfLife|Mike H]] 18:58, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
282929 +++$+++ TheCustomOfLife +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282928 +++$+++ 282928 +++$+++ 2004-09-08 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.094695620E09 +++$+++ Maybe. Is it a publicity photo, or was it from a magazine, or a still from the show, or what? It's also very important to contact the website owner of where you got it and ask. It's common courtesy. I'm going to the bank; be back in an hour.  +++$+++ :Maybe. Is it a publicity photo, or was it from a magazine, or a still from the show, or what? It's also very important to contact the website owner of where you got it and ask. It's common courtesy. I'm going to the bank; be back in an hour. [[User:TheCustomOfLife|Mike H]] 19:07, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
282930 +++$+++ TheCustomOfLife +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282928 +++$+++ 282929 +++$+++ 2004-09-08 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.094699700E09 +++$+++ It should be best to wait for the permission, since they took the shot and not you. In any case, it's really easy to get people to say yes. When they do, you would put the tag fairuse with the {{}} around it into the picture description.  +++$+++ ::It should be best to wait for the permission, since they took the shot and not you. In any case, it's really easy to get people to say yes. When they do, you would put the tag fairuse with the {{}} around it into the picture description. [[User:TheCustomOfLife|Mike H]] 20:15, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)

20786 +++$+++ N419BH +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-03 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.280882520E09 +++$+++ Giving you a heads up that I have undone your removal of the POV tag from the article. Discuss issues on the talk page and remove the tag only when clear consensus has been established. From a cursory glance, it appears the lead is written in a decidedly \"pro gun\" POV. Perhaps you could rewrite the lead more neutrally, and discuss the Supreme court cases in a separate section later in the article. <span style=\"font-size:smaller;font-family:'arial bold',sans-serif;border:1px solid Black;\"> +++$+++ Giving you a heads up that I have undone your removal of the POV tag from the article. Discuss issues on the talk page and remove the tag only when clear consensus has been established. From a cursory glance, it appears the lead is written in a decidedly "pro gun" POV. Perhaps you could rewrite the lead more neutrally, and discuss the Supreme court cases in a separate section later in the article. <span style="font-size:smaller;font-family:'arial bold',sans-serif;border:1px solid Black;">[[User:N419BH|<span style="color:Black;background:#FFD700;">N419</span>]][[User talk:N419BH|<span style="background:Black;color:#FFD700;">BH</span>]]</span> 17:42, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
20787 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20786 +++$+++ 20786 +++$+++ 2010-08-03 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.280885160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up. I was just one of many who removed it.  IMHO Supreme Court determinations are the \"gorilla in the living\" room on the subject and noting what they have defined is suitable for the lead.   If not them, then what is more suitable? The \"dispute\" is one person who doesn't want them covered.  Some variant of the Colbert quote comes to mind: \"Reality has a pro-2A rights bias\" :-)  Again, thanks for the note.   Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up. I was just one of many who removed it.  IMHO Supreme Court determinations are the "gorilla in the living" room on the subject and noting what they have defined is suitable for the lead.   If not them, then what is more suitable? The "dispute" is one person who doesn't want them covered.  Some variant of the Colbert quote comes to mind: "Reality has a pro-2A rights bias" :-)  Again, thanks for the note.   Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:26, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
20788 +++$+++ N419BH +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20786 +++$+++ 20787 +++$+++ 2010-08-03 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.280885940E09 +++$+++ The Supreme Court cases should most certainly be covered, but not in the lead, and without adding individual analysis. The lead should simply give a brief overview of the topic. Something along the lines of what it is (Second Amendment), what it does (the right to keep and bear arms), and a statement to the fact that the amendment is controversial. I'll take a look at it and probably rewrite the lead myself. The issue you might run into with the Supreme Court cases is it is quite easy to editorialize the rulings without intending to. I recommend using lots of sources and quoting them as much as possible. Otherwise the material may be challenged as \"unsourced speculation\" and removed. Good luck! <span style=\"font-size:smaller;font-family:'arial bold',sans-serif;border:1px solid Black;\"> +++$+++ ::The Supreme Court cases should most certainly be covered, but not in the lead, and without adding individual analysis. The lead should simply give a brief overview of the topic. Something along the lines of what it is (Second Amendment), what it does (the right to keep and bear arms), and a statement to the fact that the amendment is controversial. I'll take a look at it and probably rewrite the lead myself. The issue you might run into with the Supreme Court cases is it is quite easy to editorialize the rulings without intending to. I recommend using lots of sources and quoting them as much as possible. Otherwise the material may be challenged as "unsourced speculation" and removed. Good luck! <span style="font-size:smaller;font-family:'arial bold',sans-serif;border:1px solid Black;">[[User:N419BH|<span style="color:Black;background:#FFD700;">N419</span>]][[User talk:N419BH|<span style="background:Black;color:#FFD700;">BH</span>]]</span> 18:39, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
20789 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20786 +++$+++ 20788 +++$+++ 2010-08-03 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.280888400E09 +++$+++ I guess what I really meant \/ intended is that meaning should be briefly explained.  That said, one thing leads to another. The only definitive meanings are where the Supreme Court has ruled. So then the only safe thing to say is what they said, and that THEY said it.   I'm trying to build a section from which to summarize that.   Trying to source it from rock solid objective summaries of just the rulings.  The one I found by the Cornell School of Law seems to be that.  Hoping to find 1 or 2 more that are that good\/objective\/reliable.  BTW, you're not going to be able to figure out what's really going at the the 2A site unless you take a really close thorough look.  Sort of the opposite of what it appears at first glance.   Thanks again for the note.  Sincerely,  +++$+++ ::: I guess what I really meant / intended is that meaning should be briefly explained.  That said, one thing leads to another. The only definitive meanings are where the Supreme Court has ruled. So then the only safe thing to say is what they said, and that THEY said it.   I'm trying to build a section from which to summarize that.   Trying to source it from rock solid objective summaries of just the rulings.  The one I found by the Cornell School of Law seems to be that.  Hoping to find 1 or 2 more that are that good/objective/reliable.  BTW, you're not going to be able to figure out what's really going at the the 2A site unless you take a really close thorough look.  Sort of the opposite of what it appears at first glance.   Thanks again for the note.  Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 19:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

282931 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282931 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-09-17 23:13:00 +++$+++ 1.095487980E09 +++$+++ I'm not certain why you are intent on reopening a closed discussion. My judgement with regard to fictional characters is not based on their national origin. Thanks for your opinion on my demeanor. -  +++$+++ I'm not certain why you are intent on reopening a closed discussion. My judgement with regard to fictional characters is not based on their national origin. Thanks for your opinion on my demeanor. - [[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]] 23:13, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
282932 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282931 +++$+++ 282931 +++$+++ 2004-09-18 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.095552060E09 +++$+++ \"Closed\" in the sense of \"over with\" rather than \"exclusive\". As in sleeping dog, lying. And while we disagree about the importance of national chauvinism, there are plenty here who are strong advocates of civic vanity. I just don't happen to think either is an issue regarding spinning off the fictional personae of comedians. Good luck to you as well. -  +++$+++ :"Closed" in the sense of "over with" rather than "exclusive". As in sleeping dog, lying. And while we disagree about the importance of national chauvinism, there are plenty here who are strong advocates of civic vanity. I just don't happen to think either is an issue regarding spinning off the fictional personae of comedians. Good luck to you as well. - [[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]] 17:01, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
282933 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282931 +++$+++ 282932 +++$+++ 2004-10-15 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.097876760E09 +++$+++ Shaddap-- +++$+++ ::Shaddap--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 14:46, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

545076 +++$+++ Cowman109 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545076 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-02 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.207127700E09 +++$+++ We once tried something similar to that, and the user ended up just edit warring on the draft article.. it was an interesting phenomenon. Come to think of it I don't recall why that was a problem at all. Hmm. <font color=\"DarkGreen\"> +++$+++ We once tried something similar to that, and the user ended up just edit warring on the draft article.. it was an interesting phenomenon. Come to think of it I don't recall why that was a problem at all. Hmm. <font color="DarkGreen">[[User:Cowman109|Cowman109]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Cowman109|Talk]]</sup> 02:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
545077 +++$+++ Cowman109 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545076 +++$+++ 545076 +++$+++ 2008-04-02 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.207131120E09 +++$+++ Oh, we have his IP already, but the issue is his IP is on a range used by too many people to make a range block feasible. But yeah I'll probably try making a draft version of the page again in the near future.. <font color=\"DarkGreen\"> +++$+++ :Oh, we have his IP already, but the issue is his IP is on a range used by too many people to make a range block feasible. But yeah I'll probably try making a draft version of the page again in the near future.. <font color="DarkGreen">[[User:Cowman109|Cowman109]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Cowman109|Talk]]</sup> 03:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

20790 +++$+++ Gun Powder Ma +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-11 08:39:00 +++$+++ 1.281541140E09 +++$+++ Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion on Temple's reliability [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources\/Noticeboard#Robert K. G. Temple on Chinese and world history|here]]. Regards  +++$+++ Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion on Temple's reliability [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Robert K. G. Temple on Chinese and world history|here]]. Regards [[User:Gun Powder Ma|Gun Powder Ma]] ([[User talk:Gun Powder Ma|talk]]) 08:39, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
20791 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20790 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-11 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.281550140E09 +++$+++ I wrote something there.  Happy to do it, as I think it's clearly the right thing.  +++$+++ :: I wrote something there.  Happy to do it, as I think it's clearly the right thing. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 11:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

545081 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.206622440E09 +++$+++ Holding [[Wikipedia:Featured article review\/Action potential]] at almost two months; is there anything you can add, or do to help jumpstart it?  Best regards,  +++$+++ Holding [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Action potential]] at almost two months; is there anything you can add, or do to help jumpstart it?  Best regards, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 05:54, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
545082 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545081 +++$+++ 545081 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.206661500E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Tim; I was afraid it was out of your range, but I thought I'd try.  Best,  +++$+++ :Thanks, Tim; I was afraid it was out of your range, but I thought I'd try.  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
545083 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545081 +++$+++ 545082 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.206662040E09 +++$+++ I know; it's actually really bad, but FAR is on hold because Willow was willing to take it on.  I'm worried about how bad it is.   +++$+++ ::I know; it's actually really bad, but FAR is on hold because Willow was willing to take it on.  I'm worried about how bad it is.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:54, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
545084 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545081 +++$+++ 545083 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.206680940E09 +++$+++ Seen from the right perspective, nothing is truly bad. ;)  We all have to hope for the possibility of redemption, no?  I'm going to fix this, and any help you two could give along the way would be most welcome. :)  Ta ta for tonight,  +++$+++ :::Seen from the right perspective, nothing is truly bad. ;)  We all have to hope for the possibility of redemption, no?  I'm going to fix this, and any help you two could give along the way would be most welcome. :)  Ta ta for tonight, [[User:WillowW|Willow]] ([[User talk:WillowW|talk]]) 22:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
545085 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545081 +++$+++ 545083 +++$+++ 2008-04-04 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.207366980E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much for your help, [[User:TimVickers|Tim]]! :)  The article is coming along well, methinks, but at this point, I think I can safely say that we won't finish it by tonight. :(  I was hoping for a miracle since, after all, it is the feast day of [[Isidore of Seville|St. Izzy]], the patron saint of the [[Internet]] and one of the first [[Etymologiae|encyclopedians]]. ;)  Oh well, perhaps we'll obtain grace in another way; the [[User:SandyGeorgia|Powers That Be]] might overlook our lapses, for instance. ;)   +++$+++ :::Thanks very much for your help, [[User:TimVickers|Tim]]! :)  The article is coming along well, methinks, but at this point, I think I can safely say that we won't finish it by tonight. :(  I was hoping for a miracle since, after all, it is the feast day of [[Isidore of Seville|St. Izzy]], the patron saint of the [[Internet]] and one of the first [[Etymologiae|encyclopedians]]. ;)  Oh well, perhaps we'll obtain grace in another way; the [[User:SandyGeorgia|Powers That Be]] might overlook our lapses, for instance. ;)  [[User:WillowW|Willow]] ([[User talk:WillowW|talk]]) 20:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

20794 +++$+++ Blueboar +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20794 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-16 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.281992940E09 +++$+++ North... Some friendly advice... I have noticed that whenever you have a concern about a Policy or Guideline, you inevitably use the statistic \"90% of Wikipedia\" in raising your concern.  Please, stop doing this.  Spouting meaningless statistics and percentages actually ''harms'' your arguments and makes you look like a crank.  Just say \"a lot of articles\" or \"too many articles\" or something more generalized.  +++$+++ North... Some friendly advice... I have noticed that whenever you have a concern about a Policy or Guideline, you inevitably use the statistic "90% of Wikipedia" in raising your concern.  Please, stop doing this.  Spouting meaningless statistics and percentages actually ''harms'' your arguments and makes you look like a crank.  Just say "a lot of articles" or "too many articles" or something more generalized. [[User:Blueboar|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar|talk]]) 14:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
20795 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20794 +++$+++ 20794 +++$+++ 2010-08-16 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.281994080E09 +++$+++ Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 14:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
20796 +++$+++ Blueboar +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20794 +++$+++ 20795 +++$+++ 2010-08-16 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.281999060E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. [[User:Blueboar|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar|talk]]) 15:51, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

20798 +++$+++ Darkstar1st +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-27 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.282929180E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 10:13, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
20799 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20798 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.282932180E09 +++$+++ Happy to do it.  I haven't gotten in that deep yet, but a few things were clear pretty quickly.   +++$+++ ::Happy to do it.  I haven't gotten in that deep yet, but a few things were clear pretty quickly.  [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 11:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
20800 +++$+++ N6n +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20798 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 14:38:00 +++$+++ 1.283377080E09 +++$+++ Hello, a friendly comment; ignore if you wish. Check the 'Quotes and Excerpts' section in [[Herbert Read]]. (for 'libertarian socialism'.) Also, your argument that l.s., by \"plain English\", is a form of Socialism, is faulty. By that argument, [[dry ice]] is a form of ice. Come to my talk page if you are interested in discussing language!  +++$+++ :::Hello, a friendly comment; ignore if you wish. Check the 'Quotes and Excerpts' section in [[Herbert Read]]. (for 'libertarian socialism'.) Also, your argument that l.s., by "plain English", is a form of Socialism, is faulty. By that argument, [[dry ice]] is a form of ice. Come to my talk page if you are interested in discussing language! [[User:N6n|N6n]] ([[User talk:N6n|talk]]) 14:38, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
20801 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20798 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.283381340E09 +++$+++ Thanks I'll do that  +++$+++ :::: Thanks I'll do that [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 15:49, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
20802 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20798 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.283381640E09 +++$+++ BTW dry ice is a type of ice, and, given a choice, more likely to go into an \"ice' article than a \"dry\" article. :-)   +++$+++ :::: BTW dry ice is a type of ice, and, given a choice, more likely to go into an "ice' article than a "dry" article. :-)  [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 15:54, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
20803 +++$+++ N6n +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20798 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.283386500E09 +++$+++ Also, check the reply to your post on my talk page. (Check the link in it, the author there uses \"libertarian anarchists\", but it is clear that he\/she is talking about libertarianism.)  +++$+++ ::::: Also, check the reply to your post on my talk page. (Check the link in it, the author there uses "libertarian anarchists", but it is clear that he/she is talking about libertarianism.) [[User:N6n|N6n]] ([[User talk:N6n|talk]]) 17:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
20804 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20798 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.285006200E09 +++$+++ Forgot to say it here:  Thanks!  +++$+++ :::::: Forgot to say it here:  Thanks! [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 11:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

282946 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282946 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-04-21 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.114130520E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] 17:42, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
282947 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282946 +++$+++ 282946 +++$+++ 2005-04-21 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.114132260E09 +++$+++ These are what are often called \"Famous Last Words\" and are used as epitaphs and the like.  What is \u2018obvious\" to one is not always so to another.  Or, \"obvious\" is just :another way of saying \"my opinion.\"   +++$+++ :These are what are often called "Famous Last Words" and are used as epitaphs and the like.  What is ‘obvious" to one is not always so to another.  Or, "obvious" is just :another way of saying "my opinion."  [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] 18:11, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
282948 +++$+++ 216.31.41.111 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282946 +++$+++ 282947 +++$+++ 2005-04-21 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.114137840E09 +++$+++ Sorry about falsely accusing you of Ludlowing.  It was Too Old who posed there and his conversation with Tom that lead me to you.  i guess all roads now lead to Crestville.  +++$+++ ::Sorry about falsely accusing you of Ludlowing.  It was Too Old who posed there and his conversation with Tom that lead me to you.  i guess all roads now lead to Crestville. [[User:216.31.41.111|216.31.41.111]] 19:44, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
282949 +++$+++  +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282946 +++$+++ 282948 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ It's about damn time too.--Crestville 19:45, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) +++$+++ :::It's about damn time too.--Crestville 19:45, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
282950 +++$+++ Carptrash +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282946 +++$+++ 282948 +++$+++ 2005-04-22 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.114157280E09 +++$+++ \"Time. Time. What is time? Swiss manufacture it. French hoard it. Italians squander it. Americans say it is money. Hindus say it does not exist. Do you know what I say? I say time is a crook.\"  Peter Lorrie from \"Beat the Devil.\"   +++$+++ :::"Time. Time. What is time? Swiss manufacture it. French hoard it. Italians squander it. Americans say it is money. Hindus say it does not exist. Do you know what I say? I say time is a crook."  Peter Lorrie from "Beat the Devil."  [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] 01:08, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

265611 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265611 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-12 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.163371200E09 +++$+++ Removing the links to the subject's websites from multiple articles. That was clearly vandalism, since WP:EL ''requires'' linking to the subject's website. &mdash; +++$+++ Removing the links to the subject's websites from multiple articles. That was clearly vandalism, since WP:EL ''requires'' linking to the subject's website. &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 14:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
265612 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265611 +++$+++ 265611 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.163372700E09 +++$+++ As for 999, I only know him online, from Wikipedia, but have exchanged emails with him as well during the \"[[Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn]]\" edit wars. He ended those wars practically single-handed, by breaking up a single article about mulltiple offshoot of the order into individual cited articles and then simply reverting the addition of any uncited material (one group was adding positive uncited material to the article about themselves and adding negative information to all the others, including calling one group \"Satanic\"). I have quite a bit of respect for him because of that. He's mostly interested in the occult so probably had some of the articles you hit on his watch list. But neither of us does the other's bidding as you put it. We ask each other to watch problem articles sometimes. In fact, I asked him to watch [[Dattatreya]] when your sockpuppet [[User:Dattat]] started to harass me there. You really laid into him on his talk page for that.  &mdash; +++$+++ :As for 999, I only know him online, from Wikipedia, but have exchanged emails with him as well during the "[[Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn]]" edit wars. He ended those wars practically single-handed, by breaking up a single article about mulltiple offshoot of the order into individual cited articles and then simply reverting the addition of any uncited material (one group was adding positive uncited material to the article about themselves and adding negative information to all the others, including calling one group "Satanic"). I have quite a bit of respect for him because of that. He's mostly interested in the occult so probably had some of the articles you hit on his watch list. But neither of us does the other's bidding as you put it. We ask each other to watch problem articles sometimes. In fact, I asked him to watch [[Dattatreya]] when your sockpuppet [[User:Dattat]] started to harass me there. You really laid into him on his talk page for that.  &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 15:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
265613 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265611 +++$+++ 265612 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.163373360E09 +++$+++ Answers -- without checking them all, I assume it was me. I had copied yakety yak's edit sommary \"rm link to self-published personal website, not permitted by WP:EL\". But that is wrong I guess. I apologise, really, if that is the case.   +++$+++ ::Answers -- without checking them all, I assume it was me. I had copied yakety yak's edit sommary "rm link to self-published personal website, not permitted by WP:EL". But that is wrong I guess. I apologise, really, if that is the case.  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 15:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
265614 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265611 +++$+++ 265613 +++$+++ 2006-11-12 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.163373960E09 +++$+++ Apology accepted. Things would be much less acrimonious if you would simply do 1 or 2 at a time rather than 10 to 40. That would give people time to respond and work out the issue rather than be overwhelmed with changes they believe need to be reverted. When you tag 40 articles, people are less likely to look into the merits of each one, but when they find that a number of them are questionable or invalid, will simply revert them all. If you did the same thing a few at a time, the result would be better for everyone. (I think). &mdash; +++$+++ :::Apology accepted. Things would be much less acrimonious if you would simply do 1 or 2 at a time rather than 10 to 40. That would give people time to respond and work out the issue rather than be overwhelmed with changes they believe need to be reverted. When you tag 40 articles, people are less likely to look into the merits of each one, but when they find that a number of them are questionable or invalid, will simply revert them all. If you did the same thing a few at a time, the result would be better for everyone. (I think). &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 15:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

20805 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20805 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-02 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.283463300E09 +++$+++ First, you added something to a list sourced from a book, and I'm pretty sure from your comments it isn't sourced from a book. Secondly, it's simply your own opinion at the moment - so please find a source for it being a typical example that belongs in that section. Thanks. Note that you have said 'in place', so something like Birmingham's 'Winterval' doesn't count, as it didn't replace Christmas.  +++$+++ First, you added something to a list sourced from a book, and I'm pretty sure from your comments it isn't sourced from a book. Secondly, it's simply your own opinion at the moment - so please find a source for it being a typical example that belongs in that section. Thanks. Note that you have said 'in place', so something like Birmingham's 'Winterval' doesn't count, as it didn't replace Christmas. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 14:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
20806 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20805 +++$+++ 20805 +++$+++ 2010-09-02 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.283467980E09 +++$+++ There may be some confusion here; my first involvement was restoring the deletion.  But I think tagging it is fine; it will be easy to source.  It is so pervasive that it will be easy to source.   Sincerely,  +++$+++ :There may be some confusion here; my first involvement was restoring the deletion.  But I think tagging it is fine; it will be easy to source.  It is so pervasive that it will be easy to source.   Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 15:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
20807 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20805 +++$+++ 20806 +++$+++ 2010-09-08 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.283974200E09 +++$+++ Ok, sorry. But I've taken this to [[WP:RSN]] here. You need a source saying it's pervasive (and it needs to mention Easter as well).  +++$+++ ::Ok, sorry. But I've taken this to [[WP:RSN]] here. You need a source saying it's pervasive (and it needs to mention Easter as well). [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 12:30, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
20808 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20805 +++$+++ 20807 +++$+++ 2010-09-08 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.283976360E09 +++$+++ \"Pervasive\" is the term I used in talk; it's not in the article.  I think that we have this conversation going on in 3 1\/2 places. Should we consolidate it somewhere? Sincerely,  +++$+++ ::: "Pervasive" is the term I used in talk; it's not in the article.  I think that we have this conversation going on in 3 1/2 places. Should we consolidate it somewhere? Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 13:06, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
20809 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20805 +++$+++ 20808 +++$+++ 2010-09-09 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.284070380E09 +++$+++ At RSN. You are adding sources that don't even use the word winter, sources that aren't discussing the use of language, etc. Do you actually have a reliable source that says is an example \"of language commonly criticized as \"politically correct\" - because that's what you need. We, as editors, can't decide what is common, typical, noteworthy, etc. If you don't have such a source, please remove your new sources, and certainly remove any that don't actually talk about language and the use of \"Winter holiday\" or \"Winter program\" in place of Christmas or Christmas program.  +++$+++ ::::At RSN. You are adding sources that don't even use the word winter, sources that aren't discussing the use of language, etc. Do you actually have a reliable source that says is an example "of language commonly criticized as "politically correct" - because that's what you need. We, as editors, can't decide what is common, typical, noteworthy, etc. If you don't have such a source, please remove your new sources, and certainly remove any that don't actually talk about language and the use of "Winter holiday" or "Winter program" in place of Christmas or Christmas program. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 15:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
20810 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20805 +++$+++ 20809 +++$+++ 2010-09-09 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.284080880E09 +++$+++ I think that we're taling in too many different places, not that I don't enjoy having a conversation here.  But to keep it simple, I'll respond at RSN.   Sincerely,  +++$+++ ::::: I think that we're taling in too many different places, not that I don't enjoy having a conversation here.  But to keep it simple, I'll respond at RSN.   Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
20811 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20805 +++$+++ 20810 +++$+++ 2010-09-10 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.284150060E09 +++$+++ (this is just copy of what I wrote at RSN) I was just pointing out that this statement has the same sourcing (good or bad) that the others (which nobody is questioning) do, plus much more.   Doug, I've spent too much time on this one line already, even on the principle of it.  I'll change the wording to further reduce the \"issue\",and then let me know on my talk page where you prefer to go with this or just do what you want to do with it.  +++$+++ :::::: (this is just copy of what I wrote at RSN) I was just pointing out that this statement has the same sourcing (good or bad) that the others (which nobody is questioning) do, plus much more.   Doug, I've spent too much time on this one line already, even on the principle of it.  I'll change the wording to further reduce the "issue",and then let me know on my talk page where you prefer to go with this or just do what you want to do with it. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 13:21, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

20813 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20813 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-19 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.284885960E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I think that it would be a good compromise.  Now if some others would also compromise as you are..... Sincerely,  +++$+++ Thanks.  I think that it would be a good compromise.  Now if some others would also compromise as you are..... Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 01:46, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
20814 +++$+++ BlueRobe +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20813 +++$+++ 20813 +++$+++ 2010-09-19 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.284923640E09 +++$+++ The objections to Rand are beyond ridiculous. It simply isn't worth spending an entire day arguing against blatantly bad faith editors just to get a couple of meaningless sentences. I'm running with your idea - I'm going to create a Libertarianism page of my own.  +++$+++ :The objections to Rand are beyond ridiculous. It simply isn't worth spending an entire day arguing against blatantly bad faith editors just to get a couple of meaningless sentences. I'm running with your idea - I'm going to create a Libertarianism page of my own. [[User:BlueRobe|BlueRobe]] ([[User talk:BlueRobe|talk]]) 12:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
20815 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20813 +++$+++ 20814 +++$+++ 2010-09-19 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.284924000E09 +++$+++ Not sure that I understand  +++$+++ :: Not sure that I understand [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 12:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
20816 +++$+++ BlueRobe +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20813 +++$+++ 20815 +++$+++ 2010-09-19 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.284930900E09 +++$+++ An alternative Libertarianism article, with a slightly different label for the article that would appear on the disambiguation page. ANYTHING is better than the dire shambles that [[Libertarianism]] is in, and I really can't be bothered spending countless hours\/day\/weeks trying to reason with people who have absolutely no intention of being the least bit reasonable.  +++$+++ ::: An alternative Libertarianism article, with a slightly different label for the article that would appear on the disambiguation page. ANYTHING is better than the dire shambles that [[Libertarianism]] is in, and I really can't be bothered spending countless hours/day/weeks trying to reason with people who have absolutely no intention of being the least bit reasonable. [[User:BlueRobe|BlueRobe]] ([[User talk:BlueRobe|talk]]) 14:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
20817 +++$+++ BlueRobe +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.284986400E09 +++$+++ Stalker.  +++$+++ :::::Stalker. [[User:BlueRobe|BlueRobe]] ([[User talk:BlueRobe|talk]]) 05:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
20818 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.285006080E09 +++$+++ BlueRobe, I don't think that your idea would fly and thus would not be a way to fix the mess. I have hope for the main article, (and hope that you stay involved) especially since I don't see any underlying differences driving the battle.  Looks more like a Hatfields and McCoys situation.  As an alternative, despite the ill-chosen and oxymoron name, the \"Right Libertarian\" article is about the commonly practiced forms, and you could improve that article.   And Jrtayloriv there is  certainly no \"consensus\" at that mess of an article and related 5 years of warfare. There was a recent RFC covering 1% of the \"issues\", and even on that both \"sides\" are ignoring and misinterpreting what the closer said.  +++$+++ ::::::  BlueRobe, I don't think that your idea would fly and thus would not be a way to fix the mess. I have hope for the main article, (and hope that you stay involved) especially since I don't see any underlying differences driving the battle.  Looks more like a Hatfields and McCoys situation.  As an alternative, despite the ill-chosen and oxymoron name, the "Right Libertarian" article is about the commonly practiced forms, and you could improve that article.   And Jrtayloriv there is  certainly no "consensus" at that mess of an article and related 5 years of warfare. There was a recent RFC covering 1% of the "issues", and even on that both "sides" are ignoring and misinterpreting what the closer said. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 11:08, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
20819 +++$+++ BlueRobe +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20813 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 23:03:00 +++$+++ 1.285048980E09 +++$+++ We both know that the current Libertarianism page is a disgusting misleading shambles that is rife with misinformation (it's official grading has dropped so low that it no longer appears). And it's just getting worse - their latest endeavour is to include content about the [[Workers Solidarity Movement]], based on the evidence that some clueless insignificant knob used the term \"Libertarian\" in a book to describe a movement that is obviously an Anarchist movement.  +++$+++ :::::::We both know that the current Libertarianism page is a disgusting misleading shambles that is rife with misinformation (it's official grading has dropped so low that it no longer appears). And it's just getting worse - their latest endeavour is to include content about the [[Workers Solidarity Movement]], based on the evidence that some clueless insignificant knob used the term "Libertarian" in a book to describe a movement that is obviously an Anarchist movement. [[User:BlueRobe|BlueRobe]] ([[User talk:BlueRobe|talk]]) 23:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

545104 +++$+++ Otterathome +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-09 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.207727940E09 +++$+++ I think you kind of let the vandal win with that protection. They've been at it for over a year now. Maybe it is a religious group doing it.-- +++$+++ I think you kind of let the vandal win with that protection. They've been at it for over a year now. Maybe it is a religious group doing it.--[[User:Otterathome|Otterathome]] ([[User talk:Otterathome|talk]]) 00:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
545105 +++$+++ Aunt Entropy +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545104 +++$+++ 545104 +++$+++ 2008-04-09 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.207801620E09 +++$+++ The title of this section was '''not''' referring to you. -- +++$+++ :The title of this section was '''not''' referring to you. --[[User:Aunt Entropy|Aunt Entropy]] ([[User talk:Aunt Entropy|talk]]) 21:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
545106 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545104 +++$+++ 545104 +++$+++ 2008-04-09 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.207740180E09 +++$+++ Tim, please let me delete this.  Puhlease!!!  I have a tough week.   +++$+++ :Tim, please let me delete this.  Puhlease!!!  I have a tough week.  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 04:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

20820 +++$+++ Off2riorob +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-20 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.285051380E09 +++$+++ Hi. As you recently commented in the [[Wikipedia:Pending changes\/Straw poll|straw poll]] regarding the ongoing usage and trial of [[Wikipedia:Pending changes|Pending changes]], this is to notify you that there is an '''[[Wikipedia:Pending changes\/Straw poll on interim usage|interim straw poll]]''' with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. '''[[Wikipedia:Pending changes\/Straw poll on interim usage|Your input]]''' on this issue is greatly appreciated.  +++$+++ Hi. As you recently commented in the [[Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll|straw poll]] regarding the ongoing usage and trial of [[Wikipedia:Pending changes|Pending changes]], this is to notify you that there is an '''[[Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage|interim straw poll]]''' with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. '''[[Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage|Your input]]''' on this issue is greatly appreciated. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 23:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
20821 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.285096260E09 +++$+++ After 5 years of warfare, that article is a mess, and the warfare continues.  It can't get any worse or more \"disrupted\" than it already is.    And many of the main participants are seeking to denigrate or have dismissed everything that their \"opponents\" say on the TALK page simply for lack of sourcing on the TALK page; without even disputing or discussing what was said. On the flip side, I don't see any underlying disputes behind the warfare, it's more of a Hatfields and McCoys situation, which makes the situation much more promising than some of the other \"eternal warfare\" articles.   Otherwise I would have given up and left the article long ago.   And so I think that if they would start discussing instead of warfare via wiki-lawyering there would be progress.  All of my \"wiki-lawyering\" comments are in statements along the lines of \"why don't you discuss instead of wiki-lawyering\" and I consider such to be a constructive effort. +++$+++ :After 5 years of warfare, that article is a mess, and the warfare continues.  It can't get any worse or more "disrupted" than it already is.    And many of the main participants are seeking to denigrate or have dismissed everything that their "opponents" say on the TALK page simply for lack of sourcing on the TALK page; without even disputing or discussing what was said. On the flip side, I don't see any underlying disputes behind the warfare, it's more of a Hatfields and McCoys situation, which makes the situation much more promising than some of the other "eternal warfare" articles.   Otherwise I would have given up and left the article long ago.   And so I think that if they would start discussing instead of warfare via wiki-lawyering there would be progress.  All of my "wiki-lawyering" comments are in statements along the lines of "why don't you discuss instead of wiki-lawyering" and I consider such to be a constructive effort.[[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 12:11, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
20822 +++$+++ Yworo +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.285100400E09 +++$+++ It's not warfare. It's the simple requiring of following Wikipedia sourcing requirements.  +++$+++ ::::It's not warfare. It's the simple requiring of following Wikipedia sourcing requirements. [[User:Yworo|Yworo]] ([[User talk:Yworo|talk]]) 13:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
20823 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.285101300E09 +++$+++ To take one narrow example, I consider people denigrating and dismissing what people say on a TALK page solely based on non- fulfillment of a non-existent requirement for citations for talk pages to be both warfare and misfired Wiki-lawyering.  So we may need to agree to disagree on that one.  Sincerely,  +++$+++ ::::: To take one narrow example, I consider people denigrating and dismissing what people say on a TALK page solely based on non- fulfillment of a non-existent requirement for citations for talk pages to be both warfare and misfired Wiki-lawyering.  So we may need to agree to disagree on that one.  Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 13:35, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
20824 +++$+++ Yworo +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.285102860E09 +++$+++ If you look at the history of the article talk page, you will see there have been virtual reams of discussion that went nowhere. If sources were ever produced, they turned out to not be reliable or to have been originally interpreted. In many cases, sources were never produced. That's what is meant by \"soapboxing\", editors expressing their opinions without any real sourcing to back them up. It leads to hours of wasted time, and the correct solution is to bring the sources to the discussion along with the opinions, so there is some basis for determining whether time is being well spent. This requiring of sources on the talk page happens on all contentious articles where soapboxing is a problem. It is not unreasonable and it is consensus driven; therefore there doesn't have to be a rule for it. Most editors know that only sourced material matters, and not their own opinions, and have no problem with this requirement unless they are actually POV warriors. Please think about how your reaction to this consensus requirement makes you appear.  +++$+++ ::::::If you look at the history of the article talk page, you will see there have been virtual reams of discussion that went nowhere. If sources were ever produced, they turned out to not be reliable or to have been originally interpreted. In many cases, sources were never produced. That's what is meant by "soapboxing", editors expressing their opinions without any real sourcing to back them up. It leads to hours of wasted time, and the correct solution is to bring the sources to the discussion along with the opinions, so there is some basis for determining whether time is being well spent. This requiring of sources on the talk page happens on all contentious articles where soapboxing is a problem. It is not unreasonable and it is consensus driven; therefore there doesn't have to be a rule for it. Most editors know that only sourced material matters, and not their own opinions, and have no problem with this requirement unless they are actually POV warriors. Please think about how your reaction to this consensus requirement makes you appear. [[User:Yworo|Yworo]] ([[User talk:Yworo|talk]]) 14:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
20825 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.285103280E09 +++$+++ You are missing the whole middle ground where things really happen.  Sourcing is intertwined with discussions, not used as a way to denigrate other people's points without even discussing them.  +++$+++ ::::::: You are missing the whole middle ground where things really happen.  Sourcing is intertwined with discussions, not used as a way to denigrate other people's points without even discussing them. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 14:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
20826 +++$+++ Yworo +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.285103640E09 +++$+++ IMO, you need to take an emotional step back. It's only your ''opinion'' that requiring sources is being used to denigrate ''people''. It's not, it being used to denigrate ''unsourced opinions'', which is quite different. Only to the extent that the people overidentify with their own opinions will this cause them to feel offended. In such a case, they may be too emotionally involved with the subject to be objective about improving the article.  +++$+++ ::::::::IMO, you need to take an emotional step back. It's only your ''opinion'' that requiring sources is being used to denigrate ''people''. It's not, it being used to denigrate ''unsourced opinions'', which is quite different. Only to the extent that the people overidentify with their own opinions will this cause them to feel offended. In such a case, they may be too emotionally involved with the subject to be objective about improving the article. [[User:Yworo|Yworo]] ([[User talk:Yworo|talk]]) 14:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
20827 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.285107480E09 +++$+++ I corrected a typo which may have clouded what I said on this. What I said\/ meant was \"used as a way to denigrate other people's POINTS without even discussing them.denigrating peoples, I was not discussing denigrating PEOPLE.  +++$+++ ::::::::: I corrected a typo which may have clouded what I said on this. What I said/ meant was "used as a way to denigrate other people's POINTS without even discussing them.denigrating peoples, I was not discussing denigrating PEOPLE. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 15:18, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
20828 +++$+++ Jrtayloriv +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.285112040E09 +++$+++ That didn't really change much. Yworo's point still stands. The problem is not with the people who are asking for reliable sources, but with the people who are incapable of presenting sources or Wikipedia policy to support their suggested changes. --  +++$+++ ::::::::::That didn't really change much. Yworo's point still stands. The problem is not with the people who are asking for reliable sources, but with the people who are incapable of presenting sources or Wikipedia policy to support their suggested changes. -- [[User:Jrtayloriv|Jrtayloriv]] ([[User talk:Jrtayloriv|talk]]) 16:34, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
20829 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.285115640E09 +++$+++ I made my point above, including my assessment of what has been happening.  Both of you keep 1\/2 changing the topic away from what I brought up.  If you think that it might help to discuss this further, then I would like to discuss this further.   If you are writing this to score hits in the overall war at that article, I am not in that war, and don't want to do that.  If that is the case, then I would like to end this as agreeing to disagree. Sincerely,  +++$+++ ::::::::::: I made my point above, including my assessment of what has been happening.  Both of you keep 1/2 changing the topic away from what I brought up.  If you think that it might help to discuss this further, then I would like to discuss this further.   If you are writing this to score hits in the overall war at that article, I am not in that war, and don't want to do that.  If that is the case, then I would like to end this as agreeing to disagree. Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 17:34, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
20830 +++$+++ BlueRobe +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ 20821 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.285099260E09 +++$+++ Yworo, you've been spamming [[Wikipedia:WARNING|WP:Warnings]] on the User pages of everyone who disagrees with you on [[Talk:Libertarianism]]. You're nowhere near as bad as some of the other regulars in that talk page, but you are clearly trigger-happy when it comes to citing WP:policy and using Wiki-litigation as a means to force those who challenge your views to back-down.  +++$+++ ::Yworo, you've been spamming [[Wikipedia:WARNING|WP:Warnings]] on the User pages of everyone who disagrees with you on [[Talk:Libertarianism]]. You're nowhere near as bad as some of the other regulars in that talk page, but you are clearly trigger-happy when it comes to citing WP:policy and using Wiki-litigation as a means to force those who challenge your views to back-down. [[User:BlueRobe|BlueRobe]] ([[User talk:BlueRobe|talk]]) 13:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
20831 +++$+++ Yworo +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20820 +++$+++ 20830 +++$+++ 2010-09-21 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.285100400E09 +++$+++ I'm not interested in your opinion, BlueRobe.  +++$+++ :::I'm not interested in your opinion, BlueRobe. [[User:Yworo|Yworo]] ([[User talk:Yworo|talk]]) 13:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

282965 +++$+++ Johnleemk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-11 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.139712780E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|No personal attacks]], please. The subject of the article is Noel, so presumably when the article refers to Gallagher, it refers to him. It can refer to Liam as \"Liam Gallagher\" or \"Liam\" as necessary. Also, &amp;mdash; is the proper way to mark such dashes; while it's a petty reason on its own to object, it doesn't hurt and it looks more professional. I don't object only for small problems like that. The trivia section is unencyclopedic and is very jarring to readers; any information useful enough to be in the article is useful enough to fit somewhere in the article. If it's something pointless and unencyclopedic (i.e. \"Foo is 5 feet 4 inches tall\") shouldn't be in an encyclopedia article. If Noel really is controversial as he is (which I know he is; I've read quite a bit about his antics), there should be plenty of fodder from tabloids to stuff in the controversy section.  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|No personal attacks]], please. The subject of the article is Noel, so presumably when the article refers to Gallagher, it refers to him. It can refer to Liam as "Liam Gallagher" or "Liam" as necessary. Also, &amp;mdash; is the proper way to mark such dashes; while it's a petty reason on its own to object, it doesn't hurt and it looks more professional. I don't object only for small problems like that. The trivia section is unencyclopedic and is very jarring to readers; any information useful enough to be in the article is useful enough to fit somewhere in the article. If it's something pointless and unencyclopedic (i.e. "Foo is 5 feet 4 inches tall") shouldn't be in an encyclopedia article. If Noel really is controversial as he is (which I know he is; I've read quite a bit about his antics), there should be plenty of fodder from tabloids to stuff in the controversy section. [[User:Johnleemk|Johnleemk]] | [[User talk:Johnleemk|Talk]] 18:53, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
282966 +++$+++ Johnleemk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282965 +++$+++ 282965 +++$+++ 2006-02-11 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.139713800E09 +++$+++ Sorry, it's just that I don't see how the phrase \"you chimp\" is related to my comments or behaviour. :p I've used the method I proposed for handling the naming before on [[Hey Jude]], but I'll admit that it's not always the best solution.  +++$+++ :Sorry, it's just that I don't see how the phrase "you chimp" is related to my comments or behaviour. :p I've used the method I proposed for handling the naming before on [[Hey Jude]], but I'll admit that it's not always the best solution. [[User:Johnleemk|Johnleemk]] | [[User talk:Johnleemk|Talk]] 19:10, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

545111 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545111 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-15 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.208313840E09 +++$+++ Since my first RFA ended on the 13th of November, I figure it's been long enough to try again. What do you think? Also, FYI, I went through admin coaching with Acalamari, and promised him and AGK\/Anthony they could co-nom. Let me know,  +++$+++ Since my first RFA ended on the 13th of November, I figure it's been long enough to try again. What do you think? Also, FYI, I went through admin coaching with Acalamari, and promised him and AGK/Anthony they could co-nom. Let me know, [[User:VanTucky|'''Van''']][[User talk:VanTucky|<span style="color:#FF4F00">'''Tucky'''</span>]] 19:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
545112 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545111 +++$+++ 545111 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.208335440E09 +++$+++ Please tell me when you've created the page, TimVickers: then I can add my co-nomination to it ''before'' it goes live. Thanks.  +++$+++ :Please tell me when you've created the page, TimVickers: then I can add my co-nomination to it ''before'' it goes live. Thanks. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 01:44, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

585539 +++$+++ Sceptre +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585539 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-13 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.210693560E09 +++$+++ Thank'ee. It's really annoying havign to run to four admins just to keep the harassment levelled at me bearable. ''' +++$+++ Thank'ee. It's really annoying havign to run to four admins just to keep the harassment levelled at me bearable. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 08:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
585540 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585539 +++$+++ 585539 +++$+++ 2008-05-13 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.210719900E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. If it helps, I keep your user and talk pages on my watchlist, so if someone trolls and I'm online when they do it, I can help you out. Regards.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. If it helps, I keep your user and talk pages on my watchlist, so if someone trolls and I'm online when they do it, I can help you out. Regards. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 16:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

282973 +++$+++ Johnleemk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-28 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.141170420E09 +++$+++ Wow, that was a long time ago. I removed it because of the ongoing FAC, where my objections had not been met. You can include sound clips as fair use; no need to licence them. A short (~30 seconds?) segment of a song is typically sufficient for fair use. You have to upload them in [[ogg]] format, however. I'm not sure how this can be done on Windows, since I use Linux, but [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] has a bunch of experience with this, so maybe you could ask him. Speaking of fair use, all the fair use images need fair use rationales. Please read [[WP:FU]] carefully, because most of our fair use images probably aren't \"fair\" at all. Once this can be cleared up, I think the article can be considered \"good\". Thanks, and no worries. :)  +++$+++ Wow, that was a long time ago. I removed it because of the ongoing FAC, where my objections had not been met. You can include sound clips as fair use; no need to licence them. A short (~30 seconds?) segment of a song is typically sufficient for fair use. You have to upload them in [[ogg]] format, however. I'm not sure how this can be done on Windows, since I use Linux, but [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] has a bunch of experience with this, so maybe you could ask him. Speaking of fair use, all the fair use images need fair use rationales. Please read [[WP:FU]] carefully, because most of our fair use images probably aren't "fair" at all. Once this can be cleared up, I think the article can be considered "good". Thanks, and no worries. :) [[User:Johnleemk|Johnleemk]] | [[User talk:Johnleemk|Talk]] 15:47, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
282974 +++$+++ Johnleemk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282973 +++$+++ 282973 +++$+++ 2006-02-28 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.141174380E09 +++$+++ Non-commercial-only images are verboten on Wikipedia, and may be deleted on sight, so you have to use them as fair use (which does not require permission). If you can't find the source, it's okay, but the rationales are very important.  +++$+++ :Non-commercial-only images are verboten on Wikipedia, and may be deleted on sight, so you have to use them as fair use (which does not require permission). If you can't find the source, it's okay, but the rationales are very important. [[User:Johnleemk|Johnleemk]] | [[User talk:Johnleemk|Talk]] 16:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
282975 +++$+++ Johnleemk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282973 +++$+++ 282974 +++$+++ 2006-02-28 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.141175160E09 +++$+++ Yes, but please upload them as fair use, not permission-only images. :)  +++$+++ ::Yes, but please upload them as fair use, not permission-only images. :) [[User:Johnleemk|Johnleemk]] | [[User talk:Johnleemk|Talk]] 17:06, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
282976 +++$+++ Johnleemk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282973 +++$+++ 282975 +++$+++ 2006-02-28 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.141175700E09 +++$+++ Yep. You ''need'' a fair use rationale, however; otherwise, the image may be deleted. See the images on [[Katie Holmes]] for examples of fair use rationales.  +++$+++ :::Yep. You ''need'' a fair use rationale, however; otherwise, the image may be deleted. See the images on [[Katie Holmes]] for examples of fair use rationales. [[User:Johnleemk|Johnleemk]] | [[User talk:Johnleemk|Talk]] 17:15, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
282977 +++$+++ Johnleemk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282973 +++$+++ 282976 +++$+++ 2006-02-28 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.141176180E09 +++$+++ It depends on the image and how it is used in the article. [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Fair_use_rationale|This page]] explains more about it. I suppose you could use the Katie Holmes images as a base for the rationales, but [[YMMV]].  +++$+++ ::::It depends on the image and how it is used in the article. [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Fair_use_rationale|This page]] explains more about it. I suppose you could use the Katie Holmes images as a base for the rationales, but [[YMMV]]. [[User:Johnleemk|Johnleemk]] | [[User talk:Johnleemk|Talk]] 17:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
282978 +++$+++ Johnleemk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282973 +++$+++ 282973 +++$+++ 2006-03-03 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.141420080E09 +++$+++ [[User_talk:Johnleemk#Liam_Gallagher|Natalinasmpf fixed it]]. Cheers!  +++$+++ :[[User_talk:Johnleemk#Liam_Gallagher|Natalinasmpf fixed it]]. Cheers! [[User:Johnleemk|Johnleemk]] | [[User talk:Johnleemk|Talk]] 13:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

545118 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545118 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-20 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.208752140E09 +++$+++ Hey, Tim. Can you help me out by taking a look at some of [[Sebright (chicken)]]? Specifically, in the Characteristics section there are some journal cites that I want to make sure I did correctly, and if you could perhaps add a sentence explaining the mechanism which the journal cites study (I don't quite get it), I would really appreciate it. Afterwards I'll probably put it up for GA. Thanks again for the nomination,  +++$+++ Hey, Tim. Can you help me out by taking a look at some of [[Sebright (chicken)]]? Specifically, in the Characteristics section there are some journal cites that I want to make sure I did correctly, and if you could perhaps add a sentence explaining the mechanism which the journal cites study (I don't quite get it), I would really appreciate it. Afterwards I'll probably put it up for GA. Thanks again for the nomination, [[User:VanTucky|'''Van''']][[User talk:VanTucky|<span style="color:#FF4F00">'''Tucky'''</span>]] 21:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
545119 +++$+++ VanTucky +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545118 +++$+++ 545118 +++$+++ 2008-04-21 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.208830020E09 +++$+++ Thanks a million Tim, I appreciate you lending your expertise. Now if only ten of your colleagues would do the same... ;)  +++$+++ :Thanks a million Tim, I appreciate you lending your expertise. Now if only ten of your colleagues would do the same... ;) [[User:VanTucky|'''Van''']][[User talk:VanTucky|<span style="color:#FF4F00">'''Tucky'''</span>]] 19:07, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

20832 +++$+++ Darkstar1st +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-30 15:11:00 +++$+++ 1.285884660E09 +++$+++ at last the mighty and holy North8000 has come crashing to earth after singeing the wax on his wingsuit.  to date, you have been one of the most polite, intelligent, and agreeable editor to support bringing the article into line with wp weight\/primary topic rules.  after many verbose pleasantries, and several valid points, we can now all see it was only a smokescreen, and your true intent was to soapbox.  it appears these attacks are the last bastion of hope used by your accusers when no intelligent argument can be made to the reason you presented, i am starting a sockpuppet investigation, as you most certainly have exposed yourself as the one person plaguing wp to disrupt the article since 2006.   +++$+++ at last the mighty and holy North8000 has come crashing to earth after singeing the wax on his wingsuit.  to date, you have been one of the most polite, intelligent, and agreeable editor to support bringing the article into line with wp weight/primary topic rules.  after many verbose pleasantries, and several valid points, we can now all see it was only a smokescreen, and your true intent was to soapbox.  it appears these attacks are the last bastion of hope used by your accusers when no intelligent argument can be made to the reason you presented, i am starting a sockpuppet investigation, as you most certainly have exposed yourself as the one person plaguing wp to disrupt the article since 2006.  [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 15:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
20833 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20832 +++$+++ 20832 +++$+++ 2010-09-30 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.285888320E09 +++$+++ Darkstar, I am completely baffled by this, I don't know where you are coming from or what your complaint is, and you are one of the writers that I most often agree with. Can you explain?  +++$+++ :Darkstar, I am completely baffled by this, I don't know where you are coming from or what your complaint is, and you are one of the writers that I most often agree with. Can you explain? [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 16:12, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
20834 +++$+++ Darkstar1st +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20832 +++$+++ 20833 +++$+++ 2010-09-30 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.285891020E09 +++$+++ apologies, i was trying to be as obscure as the charges leveled, the absurdity of you being accused sent me into a fit of incoherent babble, as it seemed the only rational response.  is so frustrating making valid points only to have the debate ended and instead of proved wrong, you were simply accused.   +++$+++ ::apologies, i was trying to be as obscure as the charges leveled, the absurdity of you being accused sent me into a fit of incoherent babble, as it seemed the only rational response.  is so frustrating making valid points only to have the debate ended and instead of proved wrong, you were simply accused.  [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 16:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
20835 +++$+++ BigK HeX +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20832 +++$+++ 20833 +++$+++ 2010-09-30 17:57:00 +++$+++ 1.285894620E09 +++$+++ I think Darkstar1st was being sarcastic.  He's actually mocking those who have offered resistance to your proposal on the Libertarianism page.  +++$+++ :: I think Darkstar1st was being sarcastic.  He's actually mocking those who have offered resistance to your proposal on the Libertarianism page. [[User:BigK HeX|BigK HeX]] ([[User talk:BigK HeX|talk]]) 17:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
20836 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20832 +++$+++ 20835 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.286320380E09 +++$+++ I guess I was a little slow on the uptake.  +++$+++ ::: I guess I was a little slow on the uptake. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 16:13, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
20837 +++$+++ Darkstar1st +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20832 +++$+++ 20836 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.286323320E09 +++$+++ i am enjoying someone else getting the accusations for awhile.  i felt like i had little or no support for most of the last 6 months here, even bluerobe reverted an edit of mine agreeing with the editor who eventually got him banned.  why we cant have a separate page for each of the 3 terms in the dictionary is where i get off, it's been fun, but it is clear to me there are far more who wish to suppress the meaning of the term as is understood and practiced by the most people today, than there are of us, or are of just me.   +++$+++ ::::i am enjoying someone else getting the accusations for awhile.  i felt like i had little or no support for most of the last 6 months here, even bluerobe reverted an edit of mine agreeing with the editor who eventually got him banned.  why we cant have a separate page for each of the 3 terms in the dictionary is where i get off, it's been fun, but it is clear to me there are far more who wish to suppress the meaning of the term as is understood and practiced by the most people today, than there are of us, or are of just me.  [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 17:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
20838 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20832 +++$+++ 20837 +++$+++ 2010-10-29 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.288384740E09 +++$+++ TFOWR has started a very methodical process to arrive at common tenets  (the overviewdraft2 subpage) As long as the effort doesn't die of it's own weight, I have high hopes that methodical = true answer.   +++$+++ ::::: TFOWR has started a very methodical process to arrive at common tenets  (the overviewdraft2 subpage) As long as the effort doesn't die of it's own weight, I have high hopes that methodical = true answer.  [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 13:39, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

545121 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545121 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-14 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.208228280E09 +++$+++ Great chieftain o' the wiki-race, aboon them a' ye tak yer place! ;)  +++$+++ Great chieftain o' the wiki-race, aboon them a' ye tak yer place! ;) [[User:WillowW|Willow]] ([[User talk:WillowW|talk]]) 19:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
545122 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545121 +++$+++ 545121 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.208228400E09 +++$+++ My standards?  Heck, I can do MoS fixes and ref cleanup anytime the text is finished; not a problem.   +++$+++ :My standards?  Heck, I can do MoS fixes and ref cleanup anytime the text is finished; not a problem.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 20:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
545123 +++$+++ WillowW +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545121 +++$+++ 545122 +++$+++ 2008-04-14 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.208229480E09 +++$+++ That's a nice offer, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]]!  I've already fixed the dashes and most of the references, and we're working on the abc-123 thing; but I'm sure that the article still has many ''peccadillos''.  As you say, though, we should agree on the text, before we get too finicky about the MoS compliance. :)  +++$+++ ::That's a nice offer, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]]!  I've already fixed the dashes and most of the references, and we're working on the abc-123 thing; but I'm sure that the article still has many ''peccadillos''.  As you say, though, we should agree on the text, before we get too finicky about the MoS compliance. :) [[User:WillowW|Willow]] ([[User talk:WillowW|talk]]) 20:18, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

282979 +++$+++ Natalinasmpf +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-04 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.141537920E09 +++$+++ Why do you think I am so?  +++$+++ Why do you think I am so? [[User:Natalinasmpf|Elle <small><sub><font color="#CC9920">vécut heureuse</font></sub></small> <small><font color="blue"><sup>à jamais</sup></font></small>]] ([[User talk:Natalinasmpf|Be eudaimonic!]]) 21:52, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
282980 +++$+++ Fenian Swine +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282979 +++$+++ 282979 +++$+++ 2006-03-05 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.141549860E09 +++$+++ No problem. Us Oasis fans, who seem to be becoming fewer by the year, must stick together. I dont have the swirly union jack picture but I'm sure you will find it on one of the forums.-- +++$+++ :No problem. Us Oasis fans, who seem to be becoming fewer by the year, must stick together. I dont have the swirly union jack picture but I'm sure you will find it on one of the forums.--[[User:Fenian Swine|Play Brian Moore]] 01:11, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
282981 +++$+++ Fenian Swine +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282979 +++$+++ 282980 +++$+++ 2006-03-05 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.141553220E09 +++$+++ There the best band of the last decade or more but unfortunately there disliked by the media and therefore they won't pick up any teenage fans. DBTT was a very good album.-- +++$+++ ::There the best band of the last decade or more but unfortunately there disliked by the media and therefore they won't pick up any teenage fans. DBTT was a very good album.--[[User:Fenian Swine|Play Brian Moore]] 02:07, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
282982 +++$+++ Fenian Swine +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282979 +++$+++ 282981 +++$+++ 2006-03-05 16:22:00 +++$+++ 1.141604520E09 +++$+++ Well lets put it this way, they won't go out and sell 18.5 million records anymore and not because there level of music has dropped but because the media cut them to pieces in and around the 1998. Be Here Now was a good album, a very good album, but the media decided to make it up as a crap album. And ever since then, Oasis have not had anyhting near the same level of fans. DBTT was a very good album but its only sold about 2.25 millions copies.-- +++$+++ :::Well lets put it this way, they won't go out and sell 18.5 million records anymore and not because there level of music has dropped but because the media cut them to pieces in and around the 1998. Be Here Now was a good album, a very good album, but the media decided to make it up as a crap album. And ever since then, Oasis have not had anyhting near the same level of fans. DBTT was a very good album but its only sold about 2.25 millions copies.--[[User:Fenian Swine|Play Brian Moore]] 16:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
282983 +++$+++ Fenian Swine +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282979 +++$+++ 282979 +++$+++ 2006-03-05 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.141605480E09 +++$+++ Well, I thought it was a good album. I think the only reason it hasn't stood the test of time is because of the stick it received off the media. I suppose the fact that DBTT has been ot less that a year is a good point, as I argued on its discussion page, but 2.25 mill is still fairly poor. Anyway, go easy mate.-- +++$+++ :Well, I thought it was a good album. I think the only reason it hasn't stood the test of time is because of the stick it received off the media. I suppose the fact that DBTT has been ot less that a year is a good point, as I argued on its discussion page, but 2.25 mill is still fairly poor. Anyway, go easy mate.--[[User:Fenian Swine|Play Brian Moore]] 16:38, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

20839 +++$+++ TFOWR +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-05 16:04:00 +++$+++ 1.286319840E09 +++$+++ Does that make sense? I sometimes think I contradict myself at times, and I'm aware that I'm simultaneously saying experts are good ''and'' bad, and I'm not necessarily saying either, just to confuse things... it's more how I think we should handle editing, rather than a comment on experts.  +++$+++ Does that make sense? I sometimes think I contradict myself at times, and I'm aware that I'm simultaneously saying experts are good ''and'' bad, and I'm not necessarily saying either, just to confuse things... it's more how I think we should handle editing, rather than a comment on experts. [[User talk:TFOWR|<b style="color:#000">TFOW</b><b style="color:#F00">R</b>]] 16:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
20840 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20839 +++$+++ 20839 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 16:12:00 +++$+++ 1.286320320E09 +++$+++ You're so modest. I tend to think in the reverse of the sequence which you describe.  A discussion amongst objective, knowlegeble people (which integrates hundreds of RS's that they have absorbed) to get things pointed into an accurate and agreeable direction, and then create the content based on RS's and cited by RS's.  +++$+++ :You're so modest. I tend to think in the reverse of the sequence which you describe.  A discussion amongst objective, knowlegeble people (which integrates hundreds of RS's that they have absorbed) to get things pointed into an accurate and agreeable direction, and then create the content based on RS's and cited by RS's. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 16:12, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
20841 +++$+++ TFOWR +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20839 +++$+++ 20840 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.286320860E09 +++$+++ Oh, don't get me wrong - we certainly should start with discussion. It's the nature of the discussion I think we disagree about: I think it should be solely an editorial discussion, rather than one based on our own views. Our own views are helpful, in as much as they probably drive our consumption of relevant sources (I found it fairly easy to source my RFC comment precisely because it was a topic I was already interested in and had studied in some depth - mostly due to  +++$+++ ::Oh, don't get me wrong - we certainly should start with discussion. It's the nature of the discussion I think we disagree about: I think it should be solely an editorial discussion, rather than one based on our own views. Our own views are helpful, in as much as they probably drive our consumption of relevant sources (I found it fairly easy to source my RFC comment precisely because it was a topic I was already interested in and had studied in some depth - mostly due to [[User:TFOWR/Sandbox/Ethel MacDonald|this woman]] ;-) But ultimately I think there's too much risk involved in having political discussions on that talk page. [[User talk:TFOWR|<b style="color:#000">TFOW</b><b style="color:#F00">R</b>]] 16:21, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
20842 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20839 +++$+++ 20841 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.286325480E09 +++$+++ That article is locked in eternal warfare.  (I'm a newbie there ...like 2 months)   As with all of the eternal warfare articles in Wikipedia, the rules are not enough to solve it, and in fact, the rules get mis-used as methods of warfare.  They aren't even nibbling on the work that needs to get done.  Ostensibly the battle for at least the last few months is inclusion vs. exclusion of the off-beat forms of Libertarianism.  I side with the \"inclusion\" folks, but have a lot more respect for the dialog from the \"exclusion\" folks because the \"inclusion\" folks don't really have discussions on the topics, they just work to whack the \"exclusion\" folks and what they have to say via various wiki-legal warfare methods.  Anyway, nothing much is happening there  except for that war. I did start what has turned out to be a substantial section (organizations and movements) figuring that getting something in these on actual practice of Libertarianism might eventually provide some perspective beyond being just a list of what a lot of individual philosophers\/writers made up. Especially when it (hopefully) gets sorted out by wp:due\/undue standards.  I also tried to start some \"common tenets\" coverage in the \"overview\" section,  (hence my question to you)  but others took the wording off on a political-looking tangent, and others see to want to keep any talk of \"common tenets\" out of the article. (I have no clue why)   I'm pretty sure I'll be leaving the article soon.  +++$+++ ::: That article is locked in eternal warfare.  (I'm a newbie there ...like 2 months)   As with all of the eternal warfare articles in Wikipedia, the rules are not enough to solve it, and in fact, the rules get mis-used as methods of warfare.  They aren't even nibbling on the work that needs to get done.  Ostensibly the battle for at least the last few months is inclusion vs. exclusion of the off-beat forms of Libertarianism.  I side with the "inclusion" folks, but have a lot more respect for the dialog from the "exclusion" folks because the "inclusion" folks don't really have discussions on the topics, they just work to whack the "exclusion" folks and what they have to say via various wiki-legal warfare methods.  Anyway, nothing much is happening there  except for that war. I did start what has turned out to be a substantial section (organizations and movements) figuring that getting something in these on actual practice of Libertarianism might eventually provide some perspective beyond being just a list of what a lot of individual philosophers/writers made up. Especially when it (hopefully) gets sorted out by wp:due/undue standards.  I also tried to start some "common tenets" coverage in the "overview" section,  (hence my question to you)  but others took the wording off on a political-looking tangent, and others see to want to keep any talk of "common tenets" out of the article. (I have no clue why)   I'm pretty sure I'll be leaving the article soon. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 17:38, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
20843 +++$+++ TFOWR +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20839 +++$+++ 20842 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.286326200E09 +++$+++ Hopefully if things get less heated we'll make progress, editors will stick around, and maybe even return to the article.  +++$+++ :::: Hopefully if things get less heated we'll make progress, editors will stick around, and maybe even return to the article. [[User talk:TFOWR|<b style="color:#000">TFOW</b><b style="color:#F00">R</b>]] 17:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
20844 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20839 +++$+++ 20843 +++$+++ 2010-10-05 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.286326800E09 +++$+++ Cool!  I think many fear superficial or short-term involvement because, being so hard for outsiders to take the time to see what's really going on, they figure the results may be just a roll of the dice.  Maybe we could work together a bit.  I think that I've said exactly where I stand,and I think that it averages out to somewhere near the middle ground.    +++$+++ ::::: Cool!  I think many fear superficial or short-term involvement because, being so hard for outsiders to take the time to see what's really going on, they figure the results may be just a roll of the dice.  Maybe we could work together a bit.  I think that I've said exactly where I stand,and I think that it averages out to somewhere near the middle ground.   [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

282985 +++$+++ Dreadlady +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282985 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-16 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.142559060E09 +++$+++ Ah, okay. I didn't know that, I'm sorry. Still, I'd prefer song names in italics, speech marks look terrible. But there must be someone out there who knows better, so I'll defer. Can I have the trick pie though? Sounds like fun...  +++$+++ Ah, okay. I didn't know that, I'm sorry. Still, I'd prefer song names in italics, speech marks look terrible. But there must be someone out there who knows better, so I'll defer. Can I have the trick pie though? Sounds like fun... [[User:Dreadlady|Dreadlady]] 17:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
282986 +++$+++ Dreadlady +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282985 +++$+++ 282985 +++$+++ 2006-03-16 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.142562720E09 +++$+++ Changing the style for every music article would mean loads of work, so I will have to get used to it. If I get round to it next week I'll create a trick pie for you so you can give it away to everybody you would like to attack because he messes up such great articles. --  +++$+++ : Changing the style for every music article would mean loads of work, so I will have to get used to it. If I get round to it next week I'll create a trick pie for you so you can give it away to everybody you would like to attack because he messes up such great articles. -- [[User:Dreadlady|Dreadlady]] 18:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
282987 +++$+++ Dreadlady +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282985 +++$+++ 282986 +++$+++ 2006-03-20 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.142904060E09 +++$+++ As I said  +++$+++ ::As I said [[User:Dreadlady|Dreadlady]] 17:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

615143 +++$+++ Jackehammond +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615143 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-18 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.261148640E09 +++$+++ Mr. Mohammad, Please find the pages to the [http:\/\/s16.photobucket.com\/albums\/b24\/hybenamon\/GLUBB\/ Second Battle of Yarmouk].  Put cursor in left hand corner of page to zoom in or zoom out to read. If you need any more information from General Glubb's 1963 book, feel free to ask.  For example the First Battle of the Yarmouk.  The guest password for this album is '''yarmouk'''. Finally, thank you for your kind offer to attempt to your best to make The Battle of Yarmouk (ie the final battle) balanced with all the historians opinions and objections on this subject. -- +++$+++ Mr. Mohammad, Please find the pages to the [http://s16.photobucket.com/albums/b24/hybenamon/GLUBB/ Second Battle of Yarmouk].  Put cursor in left hand corner of page to zoom in or zoom out to read. If you need any more information from General Glubb's 1963 book, feel free to ask.  For example the First Battle of the Yarmouk.  The guest password for this album is '''yarmouk'''. Finally, thank you for your kind offer to attempt to your best to make The Battle of Yarmouk (ie the final battle) balanced with all the historians opinions and objections on this subject. --[[User:Jackehammond|Jackehammond]] ([[User talk:Jackehammond|talk]]) 07:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
615144 +++$+++ Jackehammond +++$+++ Mohammad adil +++$+++ 615143 +++$+++ 615143 +++$+++ 2009-12-18 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.261195140E09 +++$+++ Dear Mr. Mohammad, I will fully agree that the [[Battle of Yarmouk]] is as the first paragraph states \"''The Battle of Yarmouk is regarded as one of the most decisive battles in military history'' ...\" In my opinion it is one of the most three decisive battles in Islamic military history.  What would you consider to be top three.  My list would be the [[Battle of Yarmouk]] that secured Muslim conquest outside of the Arabian peninsula and secured the territories south of the Taurus Mountains and North Africa, the [[Battle of Ain Jalut]] which stopped the Mongol conquest of both the Muslim and Christian world, and [[Siege of Malta (1565)]] which actually was the battle that spelled the beginning of the end of Ottoman conquest and therefore the Muslim military tide in history.  Which three battles in your opinion are the most important to the Muslim world -- +++$+++ : Dear Mr. Mohammad, I will fully agree that the [[Battle of Yarmouk]] is as the first paragraph states "''The Battle of Yarmouk is regarded as one of the most decisive battles in military history'' ..." In my opinion it is one of the most three decisive battles in Islamic military history.  What would you consider to be top three.  My list would be the [[Battle of Yarmouk]] that secured Muslim conquest outside of the Arabian peninsula and secured the territories south of the Taurus Mountains and North Africa, the [[Battle of Ain Jalut]] which stopped the Mongol conquest of both the Muslim and Christian world, and [[Siege of Malta (1565)]] which actually was the battle that spelled the beginning of the end of Ottoman conquest and therefore the Muslim military tide in history.  Which three battles in your opinion are the most important to the Muslim world --[[User:Jackehammond|Jackehammond]] ([[User talk:Jackehammond|talk]]) 19:59, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

20845 +++$+++ Born2cycle +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-08 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.286522400E09 +++$+++ The belligerence is not fun.  I presume you know I'm not talking about your behavior.  Any suggestions?  -- +++$+++ The belligerence is not fun.  I presume you know I'm not talking about your behavior.  Any suggestions?  --[[User:Born2cycle|Born2cycle]] ([[User talk:Born2cycle|talk]]) 00:20, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
20846 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20845 +++$+++ 20845 +++$+++ 2010-10-08 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.286526000E09 +++$+++ My first guess is that BigK is sincerely having an issue with it.  One could argue that a quote is a quote,  and that any injections should be to add minimal useful\/important hard facts rather than trying to interpret\/clarify what we think they meant.  In either case it might be in good faith which for me would make it still fun.  [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 01:18, 8 October 2010 (UTC)  I just wish he\/seh would say what they are thinking instead of just dealing in rules.  +++$+++ :My first guess is that BigK is sincerely having an issue with it.  One could argue that a quote is a quote,  and that any injections should be to add minimal useful/important hard facts rather than trying to interpret/clarify what we think they meant.  In either case it might be in good faith which for me would make it still fun.  [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 01:18, 8 October 2010 (UTC)  I just wish he/seh would say what they are thinking instead of just dealing in rules. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 01:20, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
20847 +++$+++ Darkstar1st +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20845 +++$+++ 20846 +++$+++ 2010-10-08 07:55:00 +++$+++ 1.286549700E09 +++$+++ here is one i found the other day, WP:youtwoareswimmingupstreamandmakingnoprogresssitoutforawhileandwatchthemargugeamounstthemselvesforawhile    +++$+++ ::here is one i found the other day, WP:youtwoareswimmingupstreamandmakingnoprogresssitoutforawhileandwatchthemargugeamounstthemselvesforawhile   [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 07:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
20848 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20845 +++$+++ 20847 +++$+++ 2010-10-08 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.286556840E09 +++$+++ I say think bigger.   Instead of worrying about a phrase inserted into quote, the article needs a whole new lead.  The current one is a confusing mess like the rest of the article.  +++$+++ ::: I say think bigger.   Instead of worrying about a phrase inserted into quote, the article needs a whole new lead.  The current one is a confusing mess like the rest of the article. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 09:54, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

282993 +++$+++ Digitalme +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-03 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.146639840E09 +++$+++ Excuse me?  I'm not sure I want to know why Jacko is a cunt, but I would certainly like to know why you are proclaiming this on my talk page.  Also, I would like to know why I am so ignorent.--<em>[[User:Digitalme|<span style=\"color:#000000;\">digital_m<\/span>]] +++$+++ Excuse me?  I'm not sure I want to know why Jacko is a cunt, but I would certainly like to know why you are proclaiming this on my talk page.  Also, I would like to know why I am so ignorent.--<em>[[User:Digitalme|<span style="color:#000000;">digital_m</span>]][[User:Digitalme/Esperanza|<span style="color:green; cursor:help;">e</span>]]</em><sub><span style="color:#770000; cursor: crosshair;">(</span>[[User_talk:Digitalme|<span style="color:#770000; cursor:crosshair;">Talk</span>]]<span style="color:#770000; cursor: crosshair;">)</span><em><span style="color:#000099; cursor:crosshair;">(</span></em>[[Special:Contributions/Digitalme|<em><span style="color:#000099; cursor:crosshair;">Contribs</span></em>]]<em><span style="color:#000099; cursor:crosshair;">)</span></em></sub> 00:04, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
282994 +++$+++ Digitalme +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282993 +++$+++ 282993 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.146640260E09 +++$+++ Ah, alright, I understand now.  I revert so much vandalism that I didn't recall reverting that particular page.  No offense taken, I was just a little confused when that message showed up on my talk page.  :D  Regards.  --<em>[[User:Digitalme|<span style=\"color:#000000;\">digital_m<\/span>]] +++$+++ :Ah, alright, I understand now.  I revert so much vandalism that I didn't recall reverting that particular page.  No offense taken, I was just a little confused when that message showed up on my talk page.  :D  Regards.  --<em>[[User:Digitalme|<span style="color:#000000;">digital_m</span>]][[User:Digitalme/Esperanza|<span style="color:green; cursor:help;">e</span>]]</em><sub><span style="color:#770000; cursor: crosshair;">(</span>[[User_talk:Digitalme|<span style="color:#770000; cursor:crosshair;">Talk</span>]]<span style="color:#770000; cursor: crosshair;">)</span><em><span style="color:#000099; cursor:crosshair;">(</span></em>[[Special:Contributions/Digitalme|<em><span style="color:#000099; cursor:crosshair;">Contribs</span></em>]]<em><span style="color:#000099; cursor:crosshair;">)</span></em></sub> 00:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

20850 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20850 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-29 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.288384260E09 +++$+++ As a side comment, I think that things get a lot simpler if one aspires to just make an accurate and informative article, and check all other agendas at the door. Sincerely,   +++$+++ As a side comment, I think that things get a lot simpler if one aspires to just make an accurate and informative article, and check all other agendas at the door. Sincerely,  [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 13:31, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
20851 +++$+++ Dylan Flaherty +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20850 +++$+++ 20850 +++$+++ 2010-10-29 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.288384440E09 +++$+++ I can only agree with that.  +++$+++ :I can only agree with that. [[User:Dylan Flaherty|Dylan Flaherty]] ([[User talk:Dylan Flaherty|talk]]) 13:34, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

282995 +++$+++ Manboobies +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-03 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.146642060E09 +++$+++ What's your damage, hairy?-- +++$+++ What's your damage, hairy?--[[User:Manboobies|Manboobies]] 00:41, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
282996 +++$+++ Manboobies +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282995 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-03 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.146721560E09 +++$+++ Aww! How can I disagree with someone who has such fluffy looking hair. Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww. etc-- +++$+++ ::Aww! How can I disagree with someone who has such fluffy looking hair. Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww. etc--[[User:Manboobies|Manboobies]] 22:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

20852 +++$+++ FT2 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20852 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-29 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.288398900E09 +++$+++ I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Sock_puppetry&diff=393642302&oldid=393635846 moved] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Sock_puppetry&diff=393593668&oldid=393563230 your post] to the current section. Hopefully this is what you intended, it looks like the number of sections caused some confusion. If incorrect please fix it and my apologies, if correct could you drop a note there to confirm. Thanks.  +++$+++ I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Sock_puppetry&diff=393642302&oldid=393635846 moved] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Sock_puppetry&diff=393593668&oldid=393563230 your post] to the current section. Hopefully this is what you intended, it looks like the number of sections caused some confusion. If incorrect please fix it and my apologies, if correct could you drop a note there to confirm. Thanks. [[user:FT2|FT2]]&nbsp;<sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]])</span></sup> 17:35, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
20853 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20852 +++$+++ 20852 +++$+++ 2010-10-29 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.288401240E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I'm still confused, so I'll figure that you understand it better than I do.  +++$+++ :Thanks.  I'm still confused, so I'll figure that you understand it better than I do. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:14, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

282997 +++$+++ 138.130.219.186 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-09 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.147197540E09 +++$+++ you randomly vandalize my posts, and then think of yourself better than me. just because i'm black. that's why isn't it? why victimize me? have a group out to get all people with melanin in their skin? is it a fun thing to do? racist, explain yourself. i did not launch a single attack at you until you started a personal vendetta against me. now i am fighting back, cause i'm not givin' up, no way in hell. -- +++$+++ you randomly vandalize my posts, and then think of yourself better than me. just because i'm black. that's why isn't it? why victimize me? have a group out to get all people with melanin in their skin? is it a fun thing to do? racist, explain yourself. i did not launch a single attack at you until you started a personal vendetta against me. now i am fighting back, cause i'm not givin' up, no way in hell. --[[User:138.130.219.186|138.130.219.186]] 10:59, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
282998 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 282997 +++$+++ 282997 +++$+++ 2006-05-09 11:08:00 +++$+++ 1.147198080E09 +++$+++ Stop being stupid, I kicked off at you because you were being a tosser, writing stupid things and foaming at the mouth like a fucking fool just because someone was legitimately critising your bloved overrated cunt. And you started when you said you wished I had cancer you stupid wanker. We both know there was no way I could have known you were black, not that it matters because I didn't say anything racist. You were the one bieng a stupid wanker. You're a vandal. You're anti-wikipedian. I'm a fucking good contributer. Now fuck off.-- +++$+++ :Stop being stupid, I kicked off at you because you were being a tosser, writing stupid things and foaming at the mouth like a fucking fool just because someone was legitimately critising your bloved overrated cunt. And you started when you said you wished I had cancer you stupid wanker. We both know there was no way I could have known you were black, not that it matters because I didn't say anything racist. You were the one bieng a stupid wanker. You're a vandal. You're anti-wikipedian. I'm a fucking good contributer. Now fuck off.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 11:08, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

20854 +++$+++ Wpwatchdog +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20854 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-05 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.288981680E09 +++$+++ As you probably noticed, I've been adding the various dives to the article over the last several days.  I actually planned to rename one of the subsections exactly as you renamed it.  However, I did change the  subsection that you renamed to a section so that all the dives are in one section and the discussion of the theories are in another section.-- +++$+++ As you probably noticed, I've been adding the various dives to the article over the last several days.  I actually planned to rename one of the subsections exactly as you renamed it.  However, I did change the  subsection that you renamed to a section so that all the dives are in one section and the discussion of the theories are in another section.--[[User:Wpwatchdog|Wpwatchdog]] ([[User talk:Wpwatchdog|talk]]) 11:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
20855 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20854 +++$+++ 20854 +++$+++ 2010-11-05 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.288981860E09 +++$+++ Cool!  As I noted in the talk page, what a large amount of excellent work you have been doing at that article!  Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Cool!  As I noted in the talk page, what a large amount of excellent work you have been doing at that article!  Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 11:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
20856 +++$+++ Wpwatchdog +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20854 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-06 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.289093820E09 +++$+++ Thank  you for the kind words.  I have quite a few credible books on the ''Fitzgerald''.  I plan to add more citations and fact clarifications to the article-- +++$+++ :::Thank  you for the kind words.  I have quite a few credible books on the ''Fitzgerald''.  I plan to add more citations and fact clarifications to the article--[[User:Wpwatchdog|Wpwatchdog]] ([[User talk:Wpwatchdog|talk]]) 18:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

283001 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-13 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.147572660E09 +++$+++ This is an obviously personal opinion regarding \"the meaning\" behind HS - or at least some of the meaning, since he was constructing a song and would go with whatever lyric worked - but my take is that he is personalising a drug experience. He namechecks \"Eight Miles High\" (by The Byrds, which was famous as a acid-folk song), and various other references to being high and coming down (fast behind you). For me it works when he sings, \"Well, you may be a lover but you ain't no dancer\". Its only a personal opinion, as I said, but Macca was just as likely to write a serious song (\"Eleanor Rigby\", wrapped in beautiful arrangements, is still a melancholic song about loneliness) as he was to produce some trivial song about his dog. +++$+++ This is an obviously personal opinion regarding "the meaning" behind HS - or at least some of the meaning, since he was constructing a song and would go with whatever lyric worked - but my take is that he is personalising a drug experience. He namechecks "Eight Miles High" (by The Byrds, which was famous as a acid-folk song), and various other references to being high and coming down (fast behind you). For me it works when he sings, "Well, you may be a lover but you ain't no dancer". Its only a personal opinion, as I said, but Macca was just as likely to write a serious song ("Eleanor Rigby", wrapped in beautiful arrangements, is still a melancholic song about loneliness) as he was to produce some trivial song about his dog.[[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 19:11, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
283002 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283001 +++$+++ 283001 +++$+++ 2006-05-13 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.147573140E09 +++$+++ Hmm... 'twould seem that you enjoy a lively debate (and I've only been reading the first sentence of every topic on your talk page!) so I thought I would drop a quick response to your comment about HS being \"proto-punk\" - the song was (in)famously covered by my favourite punk (post punk\/gothic\/and the rest) band Siouxsie and the Banshees... +++$+++ :Hmm... 'twould seem that you enjoy a lively debate (and I've only been reading the first sentence of every topic on your talk page!) so I thought I would drop a quick response to your comment about HS being "proto-punk" - the song was (in)famously covered by my favourite punk (post punk/gothic/and the rest) band Siouxsie and the Banshees...[[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 19:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
283003 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283001 +++$+++ 283002 +++$+++ 2006-05-14 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.147668120E09 +++$+++ Ah, but Siouxsie sang \"You aint no ''fucking'' dancer...\" back in '78! re; The Beatles - there is '''loads''' of stuff that needs doing. Theres a bunch of people involved in a project to collate and cross-reference every Beatle related article; check the banners at the start of the talk pages and see if there is anything you fancy - or you could sign up for the newsletter. Anyone who is able to help is welcome! +++$+++ ::Ah, but Siouxsie sang "You aint no ''fucking'' dancer..." back in '78! re; The Beatles - there is '''loads''' of stuff that needs doing. Theres a bunch of people involved in a project to collate and cross-reference every Beatle related article; check the banners at the start of the talk pages and see if there is anything you fancy - or you could sign up for the newsletter. Anyone who is able to help is welcome![[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 21:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

545146 +++$+++ DanaUllman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545146 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-25 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.209166740E09 +++$+++ Actually, my invitation to Tim to comment is perfectly appropriate, especially in the light of the fact that Tim has made more edits to the homeopathy article than anyone else.  Because of Tim's participation in the homeopathy article, I want to alert him to the Lancet's editorial in response to the 3rd trial Dr David Reilly's team had conducted on the treatment of people with various allergy disoorders and found significant results each time, December 10, 1994, p. 1585. The editorial asserts, \"They (Reilly, et al) invite us to choose between two interpretations of this activity: either there is something amiss with the clinical trial as conventionally conducted (theirs was done with exceptional rigour); or the effects of the homoeopathic immunotherapy differ from those of placebo.\" The editorial further says, \"carefully done work of this sort should not be denied the attention of Lancet readers.\" In the article by Reilly, he says, \"Either answer suggested by the evidence to date--homoeopathy works, or the clinical trial does not--is equally challenging to current medicine science.\" Later on, he concludes, \"Our results lead us to conclude that homoeopathy differs from placebo in an inexplicable but reproducible way.\" (p. 1606)  It seems a bit odd that the Reilly research is not mentioned at all in the homeopathy article.  Tim, as you may know, many editors seem a bit \"allergic\" to proposals from me.  Perhaps a proposal from you would achieve faster consensus?   +++$+++ Actually, my invitation to Tim to comment is perfectly appropriate, especially in the light of the fact that Tim has made more edits to the homeopathy article than anyone else.  Because of Tim's participation in the homeopathy article, I want to alert him to the Lancet's editorial in response to the 3rd trial Dr David Reilly's team had conducted on the treatment of people with various allergy disoorders and found significant results each time, December 10, 1994, p. 1585. The editorial asserts, "They (Reilly, et al) invite us to choose between two interpretations of this activity: either there is something amiss with the clinical trial as conventionally conducted (theirs was done with exceptional rigour); or the effects of the homoeopathic immunotherapy differ from those of placebo." The editorial further says, "carefully done work of this sort should not be denied the attention of Lancet readers." In the article by Reilly, he says, "Either answer suggested by the evidence to date--homoeopathy works, or the clinical trial does not--is equally challenging to current medicine science." Later on, he concludes, "Our results lead us to conclude that homoeopathy differs from placebo in an inexplicable but reproducible way." (p. 1606)  It seems a bit odd that the Reilly research is not mentioned at all in the homeopathy article.  Tim, as you may know, many editors seem a bit "allergic" to proposals from me.  Perhaps a proposal from you would achieve faster consensus?  [[User:DanaUllman|DanaUllman]]<sup>[[User talk:DanaUllman|Talk]]</sup> 16:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
545147 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545146 +++$+++ 545146 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.209167100E09 +++$+++ Individual clinical trials are less important to this article than meta-analyses that combine such trials to achieve greater statistical power and make sure local bias from individual research groups is controlled for. Relying on the meta-analyses also avoids the danger that editors might pick out positive trials, and ignore negative ones (or vice versa), since meta-analyses give a rigorous and expert assessment of all the evidence.  +++$+++ :Individual clinical trials are less important to this article than meta-analyses that combine such trials to achieve greater statistical power and make sure local bias from individual research groups is controlled for. Relying on the meta-analyses also avoids the danger that editors might pick out positive trials, and ignore negative ones (or vice versa), since meta-analyses give a rigorous and expert assessment of all the evidence. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 16:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
545148 +++$+++ DanaUllman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545146 +++$+++ 545147 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.209179100E09 +++$+++ Yes, I understand that, but the reference to the above Reilly studies is that this was their 3rd of four studies on allergic disorders...and this Lancet article IS a meta-analysis of his first 3 studies, totaling 202 patients.  And when you consider what the Lancet editorial said about this work, it IS notable. It may be controversial as to whether the BROAD field of homeopathic research is positive, negative, or mixed, but it is not controversial that there is a body of evidence showing efficacy in the treatment of respiratory allergies.  THAT is my point here...and it should be noted that the Shang review of research mysteriously makes no reference to the body of work by Reilly (I file this one under \"how convenient\").  In addition to these points, there are several RS meta-analyses which are presently discussed on the Talk page which are not a part of the article.  I cannot help but sense that many editors here only want the \"negative\" meta-analyses referenced and discussed in the article.  I hope that you will help be one of the editors who wants reference to other RS meta-analsyes.   +++$+++ ::Yes, I understand that, but the reference to the above Reilly studies is that this was their 3rd of four studies on allergic disorders...and this Lancet article IS a meta-analysis of his first 3 studies, totaling 202 patients.  And when you consider what the Lancet editorial said about this work, it IS notable. It may be controversial as to whether the BROAD field of homeopathic research is positive, negative, or mixed, but it is not controversial that there is a body of evidence showing efficacy in the treatment of respiratory allergies.  THAT is my point here...and it should be noted that the Shang review of research mysteriously makes no reference to the body of work by Reilly (I file this one under "how convenient").  In addition to these points, there are several RS meta-analyses which are presently discussed on the Talk page which are not a part of the article.  I cannot help but sense that many editors here only want the "negative" meta-analyses referenced and discussed in the article.  I hope that you will help be one of the editors who wants reference to other RS meta-analsyes.  [[User:DanaUllman|DanaUllman]]<sup>[[User talk:DanaUllman|Talk]]</sup> 20:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
545149 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545146 +++$+++ 545146 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.209179760E09 +++$+++ A clinical trial with a grand total of 24 patients and then scraping together data from a set of similarly tiny trials? I'm not surprised others working in the field ignored it, I certainly would. Try looking at trials on the same topic using reasonable numbers of participants eg [[PMID 11872551]].  +++$+++ :A clinical trial with a grand total of 24 patients and then scraping together data from a set of similarly tiny trials? I'm not surprised others working in the field ignored it, I certainly would. Try looking at trials on the same topic using reasonable numbers of participants eg [[PMID 11872551]]. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 20:16, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
545150 +++$+++ DanaUllman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545146 +++$+++ 545149 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.209554700E09 +++$+++ Tim, in due respect, the Lancet published this study of 24 subjects because the researchers also conducted a meta-analysis of the 2 other studies (one of which was published in the Lancet with 144 subjects), and in total over 200 subjects. Did you know that, and if so, I'm unclear why you ignored it?  Do you still think that it is not worthy, especially in the light of the accompanied editorial in the Lancet?  This body of research is even more significant when you consider that this group of researchers published a FOURTH (!) study (in the BMJ!) on allergic rhinitis.  Because I cannot bring anything to the Talk page or to the Article, I will be curious if you are really interested in maintaining NPOV and notable RS research or if you instead want to keep research that might have found a positive result out of wikipedia. I look forward to watching what you choose to do or how you respond. By the way, the father of American homeopathy, Constantine Hering, MD, was initially a skeptic of homeopathy and was asked by a publisher to write a book critical of homeopathy. In his research and then from his experiences, he became a homeopath and a leader in the field.  I'm wondering which skeptics today may follow a similar path.   +++$+++ ::Tim, in due respect, the Lancet published this study of 24 subjects because the researchers also conducted a meta-analysis of the 2 other studies (one of which was published in the Lancet with 144 subjects), and in total over 200 subjects. Did you know that, and if so, I'm unclear why you ignored it?  Do you still think that it is not worthy, especially in the light of the accompanied editorial in the Lancet?  This body of research is even more significant when you consider that this group of researchers published a FOURTH (!) study (in the BMJ!) on allergic rhinitis.  Because I cannot bring anything to the Talk page or to the Article, I will be curious if you are really interested in maintaining NPOV and notable RS research or if you instead want to keep research that might have found a positive result out of wikipedia. I look forward to watching what you choose to do or how you respond. By the way, the father of American homeopathy, Constantine Hering, MD, was initially a skeptic of homeopathy and was asked by a publisher to write a book critical of homeopathy. In his research and then from his experiences, he became a homeopath and a leader in the field.  I'm wondering which skeptics today may follow a similar path.  [[User:DanaUllman|DanaUllman]]<sup>[[User talk:DanaUllman|Talk]]</sup> 04:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
545151 +++$+++ DanaUllman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545146 +++$+++ 545150 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.209555840E09 +++$+++ Hey, I just realized that I am not clear of what is meant by a \"topic ban.\"  I assume that it means that I cannot comment on Article pages or on Talk pages of articles that relate with homeopathy.  Do Talk pages of users count in the topic ban?  +++$+++ :::Hey, I just realized that I am not clear of what is meant by a "topic ban."  I assume that it means that I cannot comment on Article pages or on Talk pages of articles that relate with homeopathy.  Do Talk pages of users count in the topic ban? [[User:DanaUllman|DanaUllman]]<sup>[[User talk:DanaUllman|Talk]]</sup> 04:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
545152 +++$+++ DanaUllman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545146 +++$+++ 545151 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.209556320E09 +++$+++ Thanx for the clarification at my Talk page. Contrary to some editors' opinion, I do not pester.  Hopefully, I raise good questions, like the above.  I'm not expecting an answer to it tonight and will look forward to your thoughts some time in the near future.  Sweet dreams...  +++$+++ ::::Thanx for the clarification at my Talk page. Contrary to some editors' opinion, I do not pester.  Hopefully, I raise good questions, like the above.  I'm not expecting an answer to it tonight and will look forward to your thoughts some time in the near future.  Sweet dreams... [[User:DanaUllman|DanaUllman]]<sup>[[User talk:DanaUllman|Talk]]</sup> 04:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
545153 +++$+++ Enric Naval +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545146 +++$+++ 545152 +++$+++ 2008-04-30 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.209591840E09 +++$+++ Tim, please read this[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration\/Homeopathy\/Proposed_decision&diff=prev&oldid=209181611] -- +++$+++ :::::Tim, please read this[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Homeopathy/Proposed_decision&diff=prev&oldid=209181611] --[[User:Enric Naval|Enric Naval]] ([[User talk:Enric Naval|talk]]) 14:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

283004 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-14 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.147670700E09 +++$+++ Ultimately, I don't know enough about the subject to be able to edit it without risking losing important\/notable information. I hope you are able to work it yourself (or find someone else who can) to get it to GA status. Cheers. +++$+++ Ultimately, I don't know enough about the subject to be able to edit it without risking losing important/notable information. I hope you are able to work it yourself (or find someone else who can) to get it to GA status. Cheers.[[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 22:25, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
283005 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283004 +++$+++ 283004 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.149036660E09 +++$+++ I suppose he was talking to you? Anyway, Kingboyk is an admin closely involved in The Beatles - and is pretty helpful. +++$+++ :I suppose he was talking to you? Anyway, Kingboyk is an admin closely involved in The Beatles - and is pretty helpful.[[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 17:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

20861 +++$+++ Dylan Flaherty +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20861 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-10 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.289388600E09 +++$+++ I agree that \"conservative\/libertarian\" is a bit awkward, but \"composed of both conservatives and libertarians\" is a bit like \"composed of both Americans and New Yorkers\". :-)  +++$+++ I agree that "conservative/libertarian" is a bit awkward, but "composed of both conservatives and libertarians" is a bit like "composed of both Americans and New Yorkers". :-) [[User:Dylan Flaherty|Dylan Flaherty]] ([[User talk:Dylan Flaherty|talk]]) 03:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
20862 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20861 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.289388900E09 +++$+++ It's nice\/ fun talking with you!    But IMHO that is not accurate.  Neither is a subset of the other, as is the case with your analogy.  Sincerely,   +++$+++ :: It's nice/ fun talking with you!    But IMHO that is not accurate.  Neither is a subset of the other, as is the case with your analogy.  Sincerely,  [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 03:35, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
20863 +++$+++ Dylan Flaherty +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20861 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.289389080E09 +++$+++ If you're curious, take a peek a [[Libertarian conservatism]]. Either way, I'm glad we can disagree without the sort of hard feelings that seem to be endemic to the Tea Party article.  +++$+++ :::If you're curious, take a peek a [[Libertarian conservatism]]. Either way, I'm glad we can disagree without the sort of hard feelings that seem to be endemic to the Tea Party article. [[User:Dylan Flaherty|Dylan Flaherty]] ([[User talk:Dylan Flaherty|talk]]) 03:38, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
20864 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20861 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 03:52:00 +++$+++ 1.289389920E09 +++$+++ As an avid Libertarian for 25-30 years who has many spirited debates with my conservative friends on many issues, I can tell you that the two are very different in many areas.  They are direct opposites on many many issues. We've also spent thousands of words on this in work on the Libertarian articles, but, to be honest, I don't think that ''anybody'' there would assert that one is a subset of the other. If you're interested, we're working on the common tenets of the various sects of Libertarians (and related sourcing) in a worksheet at   http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Libertarianism\/OverviewDraft2      Sincerely,  +++$+++ :::: As an avid Libertarian for 25-30 years who has many spirited debates with my conservative friends on many issues, I can tell you that the two are very different in many areas.  They are direct opposites on many many issues. We've also spent thousands of words on this in work on the Libertarian articles, but, to be honest, I don't think that ''anybody'' there would assert that one is a subset of the other. If you're interested, we're working on the common tenets of the various sects of Libertarians (and related sourcing) in a worksheet at   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Libertarianism/OverviewDraft2      Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 03:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

283007 +++$+++ OneSixOne +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283007 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-19 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.148049720E09 +++$+++ Don't add pictures without justification. Leave it as it is. -- +++$+++ Don't add pictures without justification. Leave it as it is. --[[User:OneSixOne|OnesixOne]] 07:42, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
283008 +++$+++ OneSixOne +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283007 +++$+++ 283007 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.148098620E09 +++$+++ <personal attack, removed by [[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 14:08, 20 May 2006 (UTC)> -- +++$+++ :<personal attack, removed by [[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 14:08, 20 May 2006 (UTC)> --[[User:OneSixOne|OnesixOne]] 21:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
283009 +++$+++ Wallie +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283007 +++$+++ 283008 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.148129160E09 +++$+++ OK. A response. Lets calm down, guys. Crestville, is the picture really that important to you? OnesixOne, why do you want it removed.  +++$+++ ::OK. A response. Lets calm down, guys. Crestville, is the picture really that important to you? OnesixOne, why do you want it removed. [[User:Wallie|Wallie]] 05:46, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
283010 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283007 +++$+++ 283008 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.148161560E09 +++$+++ It's probably not a good idea to remove notices about blocks, as they're of use to administrators. -- +++$+++ :: It's probably not a good idea to remove notices about blocks, as they're of use to administrators. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 14:46, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
283011 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283007 +++$+++ 283010 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.148175240E09 +++$+++ I was blocked at approx. 19:11 yesterday, so why am I still blocked? Slack work, firefox. Slack work.-- +++$+++ :::I was blocked at approx. 19:11 yesterday, so why am I still blocked? Slack work, firefox. Slack work.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 18:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

20865 +++$+++ Dylan Flaherty +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20865 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-12 02:32:00 +++$+++ 1.289557920E09 +++$+++ Just want to give you something to think about.  +++$+++ Just want to give you something to think about. [[User:Dylan Flaherty|Dylan Flaherty]] ([[User talk:Dylan Flaherty|talk]]) 02:32, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
20866 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20865 +++$+++ 20865 +++$+++ 2010-11-12 12:14:00 +++$+++ 1.289592840E09 +++$+++ Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 12:14, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

545154 +++$+++ DanaUllman +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-01 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.209634560E09 +++$+++ The good news here is that Enric now knows about this important body of research and this notable Lancet editorial.  Will he or you bring it to the homeopathy article? By the way, I have no problem if you also referenced the Lewith study of 202 patients, though you will also need to acknowledge that this was not a real replication.  Amongst its many differences, it only allowed 3 (!) doses of a medicine during a 4-month period.  THAT was not the protocol used by Reilly, and his letter to the editor is notable in this drama.  If you need the specific references, just ask.  It will be curious to watch this. I sincerely hope that you take the high road. No wonder you guys want me blocked.   +++$+++ The good news here is that Enric now knows about this important body of research and this notable Lancet editorial.  Will he or you bring it to the homeopathy article? By the way, I have no problem if you also referenced the Lewith study of 202 patients, though you will also need to acknowledge that this was not a real replication.  Amongst its many differences, it only allowed 3 (!) doses of a medicine during a 4-month period.  THAT was not the protocol used by Reilly, and his letter to the editor is notable in this drama.  If you need the specific references, just ask.  It will be curious to watch this. I sincerely hope that you take the high road. No wonder you guys want me blocked.  [[User:DanaUllman|DanaUllman]]<sup>[[User talk:DanaUllman|Talk]]</sup> 02:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
545155 +++$+++ Enric Naval +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545154 +++$+++ 545154 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.209635940E09 +++$+++ The fact that Dana adds a bad faith assumption at the end makes it even worse (we don't want you blocked, Dana, we want you to start respecting wikipedia policies and stop disrupting the pages by pushing studies) -- +++$+++ :The fact that Dana adds a bad faith assumption at the end makes it even worse (we don't want you blocked, Dana, we want you to start respecting wikipedia policies and stop disrupting the pages by pushing studies) --[[User:Enric Naval|Enric Naval]] ([[User talk:Enric Naval|talk]]) 02:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

20867 +++$+++ Digiphi +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-17 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.289997120E09 +++$+++ Hey North. I'm prepared to vote Aye on your proposal. I'd like to suggest that you slightly tweak it as presented on the mediation page from \"''a populist,'' '''political''' '', largely'' '''grassroots''' ''movement in the United States''\" \u2192 to \u2192 \"''a populist, largely grassroots'' '''political movement''' ''in the United States''\". That would allow us to keep \"[[political movement]]\" linked as it is now and has been since I can remember. It would also flow better overall, and I think would remove what is one more reason for people to perhaps hold off voting for it. What you think? - +++$+++ Hey North. I'm prepared to vote Aye on your proposal. I'd like to suggest that you slightly tweak it as presented on the mediation page from "''a populist,'' '''political''' '', largely'' '''grassroots''' ''movement in the United States''" → to → "''a populist, largely grassroots'' '''political movement''' ''in the United States''". That would allow us to keep "[[political movement]]" linked as it is now and has been since I can remember. It would also flow better overall, and I think would remove what is one more reason for people to perhaps hold off voting for it. What you think? -[[User:Digiphi|<font face="Garamond">Digiphi</font>]] ([[User talk:Digiphi|<font face="Cambria"><font color="teal">Talk</font></font>]]) 04:32, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
20868 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20867 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-17 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.290024960E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  Sounds good, I'll change it.  As an aside, I just tried to come up with something to help the process move along.  +++$+++ :: Thanks.  Sounds good, I'll change it.  As an aside, I just tried to come up with something to help the process move along. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 12:16, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

283012 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283012 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-20 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.148175540E09 +++$+++ It was an autoblock, a technical limitation of the system. But you could have been civil about it, instead of which you had a go at the administrator who blocked you.  I'll give you another twelve hours to think about that. -- +++$+++ It was an autoblock, a technical limitation of the system. But you could have been civil about it, instead of which you had a go at the administrator who blocked you.  I'll give you another twelve hours to think about that. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 18:39, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
283013 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283012 +++$+++ 283012 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.148175960E09 +++$+++ I despair at this site, I really do. You really put me off contributing. Could you please define \"attack\"? Given Firefox's behaviour, I feel this is a legitimate critisism. I would ask you to reconsider your rash act. Otherwise, I'll consider just packing this all in, and that would be a shame coz I'm a damn good contributer. In fact, the only reason I was blocked in the first place was because I got annoyed at a vandal and reported him to firefox who did nothing about the vandal and failed to block them for personal attacks on me.-- +++$+++ :I despair at this site, I really do. You really put me off contributing. Could you please define "attack"? Given Firefox's behaviour, I feel this is a legitimate critisism. I would ask you to reconsider your rash act. Otherwise, I'll consider just packing this all in, and that would be a shame coz I'm a damn good contributer. In fact, the only reason I was blocked in the first place was because I got annoyed at a vandal and reported him to firefox who did nothing about the vandal and failed to block them for personal attacks on me.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 18:46, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
283014 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283012 +++$+++ 283012 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.148176500E09 +++$+++ You may consider yourself \"a damn good contributor\" but the way you interact with people is appalling and you are highly likely to drive others away if you continue in this way.  If blocking you to stop you attacking people, and as a call for you to think about what you're doing, is likely to drive you away, it's quite likely that the end effect will be a net benefit to Wikipedia because we won't have to put up with your repeated abusive remarks of which [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:OneSixOne&diff=prev&oldid=54065721 this] was just the final straw.  On the other hand, you can choose to stay and contribute without abusing ther editors. And you'll be happily welcomed if you choose that course. -- +++$+++ : You may consider yourself "a damn good contributor" but the way you interact with people is appalling and you are highly likely to drive others away if you continue in this way.  If blocking you to stop you attacking people, and as a call for you to think about what you're doing, is likely to drive you away, it's quite likely that the end effect will be a net benefit to Wikipedia because we won't have to put up with your repeated abusive remarks of which [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OneSixOne&diff=prev&oldid=54065721 this] was just the final straw.  On the other hand, you can choose to stay and contribute without abusing ther editors. And you'll be happily welcomed if you choose that course. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 18:55, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
283015 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283012 +++$+++ 283012 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.148178540E09 +++$+++ You're not allowed to drive off people who annoy you. Put that out of your mind.  I do think you're adopting the right approach if you resolve to remove all attacks from your comments. -- +++$+++ : You're not allowed to drive off people who annoy you. Put that out of your mind.  I do think you're adopting the right approach if you resolve to remove all attacks from your comments. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 19:29, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

20871 +++$+++ Malke 2010 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20871 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-27 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.290905580E09 +++$+++ Hi North8000, the mediator over on the cabal thing seems to have left the building so I've posted Nillagoon's suggestion for the edit over on the Tea Party movement talk page.  Might as well get a wider consensus anyway. +++$+++ Hi North8000, the mediator over on the cabal thing seems to have left the building so I've posted Nillagoon's suggestion for the edit over on the Tea Party movement talk page.  Might as well get a wider consensus anyway.[[User:Malke 2010|Malke 2010]] ([[User talk:Malke 2010|talk]]) 16:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
20872 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20871 +++$+++ 20871 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.290907260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up.  I'll go check it out.    +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up.  I'll go check it out.   [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 17:21, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

283016 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-20 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.148179260E09 +++$+++ Listen, you've been pretty reasonable with me (aside from the last block, which I still object to - admins are not infallable and surely there is room for legitimate critisim) so I'll leave this issue be. I still have a problem with the way Firefox handled the situation, but I will deal with that in a ''statesmanlike'' manner at a later date. I do not go looking for trouble, but I felt I had to take a hand in this situation, seeing as Firefox would not. I admit I took the wrong approach, but hey-ho. Live & learn. I hope my reputation is not now sullied (and I would reiterate I do not attack users with and frequency). I stand by my claim that I'm bloody good at this. Finally, I would advise you to be mindful of OneSixOne. He ''is'' a vandel and someone should do something if he offends again.-- +++$+++ Listen, you've been pretty reasonable with me (aside from the last block, which I still object to - admins are not infallable and surely there is room for legitimate critisim) so I'll leave this issue be. I still have a problem with the way Firefox handled the situation, but I will deal with that in a ''statesmanlike'' manner at a later date. I do not go looking for trouble, but I felt I had to take a hand in this situation, seeing as Firefox would not. I admit I took the wrong approach, but hey-ho. Live & learn. I hope my reputation is not now sullied (and I would reiterate I do not attack users with and frequency). I stand by my claim that I'm bloody good at this. Finally, I would advise you to be mindful of OneSixOne. He ''is'' a vandel and someone should do something if he offends again.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 19:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
283017 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283016 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-05-19 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.148091780E09 +++$+++ He seems to do good work but he's got a foul mouth.  I've put his talk page and that of onesixone on my watchlist. -- +++$+++ ::: He seems to do good work but he's got a foul mouth.  I've put his talk page and that of onesixone on my watchlist. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 19:23, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
283018 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283016 +++$+++ 283016 +++$+++ 2006-05-21 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.148197080E09 +++$+++ So we do recognise that you do good work.  But we want you not to be nasty to people.  We can take action to deal with OneSixOne if that is merited. -- +++$+++ : So we do recognise that you do good work.  But we want you not to be nasty to people.  We can take action to deal with OneSixOne if that is merited. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 00:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

20873 +++$+++ Malke 2010 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-01 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.291247220E09 +++$+++ Hi North, I've commented on the cabal referendum. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal\/Cases\/2010-11-07\/Tea_Party_movement#Referendum_.21votes].  I saw your comments about waiting a bit and I see your point, but things seem to be coming along on the article talk page now, and keeping things going over on the cabal page seems disruptive at this point.  Also, as we are coming to agreements on the other terms in the lead, like populist and astroturf, etc., I think it's really moot now.   +++$+++ Hi North, I've commented on the cabal referendum. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-11-07/Tea_Party_movement#Referendum_.21votes].  I saw your comments about waiting a bit and I see your point, but things seem to be coming along on the article talk page now, and keeping things going over on the cabal page seems disruptive at this point.  Also, as we are coming to agreements on the other terms in the lead, like populist and astroturf, etc., I think it's really moot now.  [[User:Malke 2010|Malke 2010]] ([[User talk:Malke 2010|talk]]) 15:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
20874 +++$+++ Digiphi +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20873 +++$+++ 20873 +++$+++ 2010-12-03 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.291419780E09 +++$+++ So...are you going to do it [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Tea_Party_movement&diff=prev&oldid=399902786][http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Tea_Party_movement&diff=prev&oldid=400297298]?? =D  +++$+++ :So...are you going to do it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tea_Party_movement&diff=prev&oldid=399902786][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tea_Party_movement&diff=prev&oldid=400297298]?? =D [[User:Digiphi|<font face="Garamond">Digiphi</font>]] ([[User talk:Digiphi|<font face="Cambria"><font color="teal">Talk</font></font>]]) 15:43, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
20875 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20873 +++$+++ 20874 +++$+++ 2010-12-03 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.291420020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note.  I just did it, just before I saw your message.  I still plan to recover \/ move that one other sentence from the old lead. Sincerely,  +++$+++ :: Thanks for the note.  I just did it, just before I saw your message.  I still plan to recover / move that one other sentence from the old lead. Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 15:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
20876 +++$+++ Digiphi +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20873 +++$+++ 20875 +++$+++ 2010-12-03 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.291420500E09 +++$+++ Nice. We'll see how it goes. Way to grow a pair, while we shuffle our feet. - +++$+++ :::Nice. We'll see how it goes. Way to grow a pair, while we shuffle our feet. -[[User:Digiphi|<font face="Garamond">Digiphi</font>]] ([[User talk:Digiphi|<font face="Cambria"><font color="teal">Talk</font></font>]]) 15:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
20877 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20873 +++$+++ 20876 +++$+++ 2010-12-03 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.291420860E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  Leadership is trying to help take people to where they pretty much already want to go, which in WP is consensus.   We'll see if I guessed right.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks.  Leadership is trying to help take people to where they pretty much already want to go, which in WP is consensus.   We'll see if I guessed right. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 16:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
20878 +++$+++ Digiphi +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20873 +++$+++ 20877 +++$+++ 2010-12-03 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.291444800E09 +++$+++ For the record, was there some objection to linking ''grassroots'' the way we do ''astroturfing''? If not, I'll even them out including the quotation marks. - +++$+++ :::::For the record, was there some objection to linking ''grassroots'' the way we do ''astroturfing''? If not, I'll even them out including the quotation marks. -[[User:Digiphi|<font face="Garamond">Digiphi</font>]] ([[User talk:Digiphi|<font face="Cambria"><font color="teal">Talk</font></font>]]) 22:40, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
20879 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20873 +++$+++ 20877 +++$+++ 2010-12-04 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.291452720E09 +++$+++ I lost track.    I didn't write any of what I put in, I just did my best to coalesce the main version of the big final conversation on the article talk page.   I was against even including \"astroturfing\", but bit the bullet.  Sincerely,  +++$+++ ::::: I lost track.    I didn't write any of what I put in, I just did my best to coalesce the main version of the big final conversation on the article talk page.   I was against even including "astroturfing", but bit the bullet.  Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 00:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
20880 +++$+++ Malke 2010 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20873 +++$+++ 20879 +++$+++ 2010-12-04 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.291492500E09 +++$+++ Did you see the post about the TPM over in U.K.\/Europe?  Interesting if it's becoming a world-wide movement.  Would need cites, but it could make an interesting new section. +++$+++ ::::::Did you see the post about the TPM over in U.K./Europe?  Interesting if it's becoming a world-wide movement.  Would need cites, but it could make an interesting new section.[[User:Malke 2010|Malke 2010]] ([[User talk:Malke 2010|talk]]) 11:55, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
20881 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20873 +++$+++ 20880 +++$+++ 2010-12-04 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.291514400E09 +++$+++ I think that that idea of a new direction towards smaller and less intrusive government is building all over the place but often has no place (organization etc.) to to go.  Major parties really don't fully buy into it, and Libertarian make the mistake of trying to be a party, plus occasionally have some wider planks in the back room that confuse people.  I think that the Tea Party has provided that, so expansion doesn't surprise me.  It will be interesting to see where it goes. It has quite a mine field to navigate to stay on course.  +++$+++ ::::::: I think that that idea of a new direction towards smaller and less intrusive government is building all over the place but often has no place (organization etc.) to to go.  Major parties really don't fully buy into it, and Libertarian make the mistake of trying to be a party, plus occasionally have some wider planks in the back room that confuse people.  I think that the Tea Party has provided that, so expansion doesn't surprise me.  It will be interesting to see where it goes. It has quite a mine field to navigate to stay on course. [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

283020 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283020 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-20 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.148173080E09 +++$+++ The postcard is copyrighted and has been claimed to be fair use (actually that's somewhat dubious claim for a number of reasons).   Unfortunately fair use cannot cover your usage of the postcard image on your talk page.  Please remove it from your talk page so as to minimise Wikipedia's liability under the copyright law. -- +++$+++ The postcard is copyrighted and has been claimed to be fair use (actually that's somewhat dubious claim for a number of reasons).   Unfortunately fair use cannot cover your usage of the postcard image on your talk page.  Please remove it from your talk page so as to minimise Wikipedia's liability under the copyright law. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 17:58, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
283021 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283020 +++$+++ 283020 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.148173680E09 +++$+++ Thanks. -- +++$+++ : Thanks. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 18:08, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
283022 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283020 +++$+++ 283021 +++$+++ 2006-05-20 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.148173860E09 +++$+++ Don't mention it.-- +++$+++ ::Don't mention it.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 18:11, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

20882 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20882 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-05 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.291536420E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Tea_Party_movement&diff=400573197&oldid=400564757 This] edit will have me chuckling for the rest of the evening! Would it be inappropriate for me to express my '''Support''' !vote to change the wording to \"raised the water level of the harbor\"? Regards,  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tea_Party_movement&diff=400573197&oldid=400564757 This] edit will have me chuckling for the rest of the evening! Would it be inappropriate for me to express my '''Support''' !vote to change the wording to "raised the water level of the harbor"? Regards, [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 00:07, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
20883 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20882 +++$+++ 20882 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.291536840E09 +++$+++ Go for it!   We gotta have some fun while we're doing this.   :-) I'm guessing that it temporarily raised the level of the harbor by .000000001\".  I hope that they warned the shoreline residents before they did it.      Have a great Sunday.  Sincerely,  +++$+++ :Go for it!   We gotta have some fun while we're doing this.   :-) I'm guessing that it temporarily raised the level of the harbor by .000000001".  I hope that they warned the shoreline residents before they did it.      Have a great Sunday.  Sincerely, [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 00:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
20884 +++$+++ Malke 2010 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20882 +++$+++ 20883 +++$+++ 2010-12-06 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.291625640E09 +++$+++ It was rumored it generated a [[Tsunami]] warning.   +++$+++ ::It was rumored it generated a [[Tsunami]] warning.  [[User:Malke 2010|Malke 2010]] ([[User talk:Malke 2010|talk]]) 00:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

283028 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-21 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.148242200E09 +++$+++ Probably, yes. But to be honest I didn't actually write the caption, nor did I upload the image. I never really read the caption and if I had, I probably would have changed it. I continued to resotre it (as I've said above) becasue this page lacks proper images of Jackson, because it draws attention to one of the more interesting tales of his life and because I do not like to give in to vandals. Thanks for helping though.-- +++$+++ Probably, yes. But to be honest I didn't actually write the caption, nor did I upload the image. I never really read the caption and if I had, I probably would have changed it. I continued to resotre it (as I've said above) becasue this page lacks proper images of Jackson, because it draws attention to one of the more interesting tales of his life and because I do not like to give in to vandals. Thanks for helping though.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 13:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
283029 +++$+++ Wallie +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.148360220E09 +++$+++ Thank you. That is a very honest statement. I think you have very good qualities as a person, when you come out with a statement like this, especially given recent events.   +++$+++ :Thank you. That is a very honest statement. I think you have very good qualities as a person, when you come out with a statement like this, especially given recent events.  [[User:Wallie|Wallie]] 21:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
283030 +++$+++ Wallie +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.148360220E09 +++$+++ PS: Don't listen to some people who criticise you here, especially admins. You have shown yourself to have a far superior character to them. Thanks again.  +++$+++ :PS: Don't listen to some people who criticise you here, especially admins. You have shown yourself to have a far superior character to them. Thanks again. [[User:Wallie|Wallie]] 21:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
283031 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ 283030 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.148368380E09 +++$+++ If you say so mate, but to sometimes its ok to be critsised.-- +++$+++ ::If you say so mate, but to sometimes its ok to be critsised.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 00:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
283032 +++$+++ Wallie +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.148386800E09 +++$+++ What you replied to me...  +++$+++ :What you replied to me... [[User:Wallie|Wallie]] 05:20, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
283033 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.148368560E09 +++$+++ lol, if you say so mate. I think I deserved a slap on the wrist and the admins weren't too bad about it. You on the other hand never even sullied your good name in the first place by swearing or fighting, so more credit to you. Cheers for helping me out anyway, much appreciated. I just don't think the lad understands the point of wikipedia-- +++$+++ :lol, if you say so mate. I think I deserved a slap on the wrist and the admins weren't too bad about it. You on the other hand never even sullied your good name in the first place by swearing or fighting, so more credit to you. Cheers for helping me out anyway, much appreciated. I just don't think the lad understands the point of wikipedia--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 00:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
283034 +++$+++ Wallie +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ 283033 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 05:20:00 +++$+++ 1.148386800E09 +++$+++ You really are a decent chap... I sure some think I'm a pain at times too. I also break the rules too, somtimes ones I don't know, and still don't know about. There are so many. I think that name calling is pointless. Also, with young people, (and old ones) they like to have a laugh. Come back with a joke. Breaks the tension. Somtimes, though, I don't like the bossy and adverserial approach of some admins. Many are OK, though. But usually the OK ones just operate behind the scenes, do good things, biulding articles, giving wise advice, etc. Anyway, I do fight sometimes, and this is wrong, but I feel you also sometimes have to \"stick up for yourself\" when under attack. I think it is a good idea to watch, and also comment on, if you want to, if you think you can help, on the Admin's notice boards. Anyone is entitled to comment. Remember also, if you get into any more strife with anyone, send me a note, and I will try to help.  +++$+++ ::You really are a decent chap... I sure some think I'm a pain at times too. I also break the rules too, somtimes ones I don't know, and still don't know about. There are so many. I think that name calling is pointless. Also, with young people, (and old ones) they like to have a laugh. Come back with a joke. Breaks the tension. Somtimes, though, I don't like the bossy and adverserial approach of some admins. Many are OK, though. But usually the OK ones just operate behind the scenes, do good things, biulding articles, giving wise advice, etc. Anyway, I do fight sometimes, and this is wrong, but I feel you also sometimes have to "stick up for yourself" when under attack. I think it is a good idea to watch, and also comment on, if you want to, if you think you can help, on the Admin's notice boards. Anyone is entitled to comment. Remember also, if you get into any more strife with anyone, send me a note, and I will try to help. [[User:Wallie|Wallie]] 05:20, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
283035 +++$+++ Kingboyk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ 283034 +++$+++ 2006-05-24 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.148534280E09 +++$+++ Admins are people too! (well some of us). -- +++$+++ :::Admins are people too! (well some of us). --[[User:Kingboyk|kingboyk]] 22:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
283036 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283028 +++$+++ 283035 +++$+++ 2006-05-25 11:30:00 +++$+++ 1.148581800E09 +++$+++ You are, yeah.-- +++$+++ ::::You are, yeah.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 11:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

265625 +++$+++ Avraham +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-14 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.163513460E09 +++$+++ I respectfully submit that there is a difference between a user's ''personal'' page on a university server, and an ''official'' university page on that same server. --  +++$+++ I respectfully submit that there is a difference between a user's ''personal'' page on a university server, and an ''official'' university page on that same server. -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] 06:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
265626 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265625 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.163539080E09 +++$+++ responded on user Avi's talk page.   +++$+++ :*responded on user Avi's talk page.  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 13:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

20888 +++$+++ Malke 2010 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20888 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-05 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.291544280E09 +++$+++ The bit about the Boston tea party is giving me a nosebleed. Just a cursory read of the latest argument being advanced is off-putting.  There are kids in Europe who know American history better than Americans.  Best to wait a bit until that is all sorted out by others down the line.  I was thinking of starting a new article about the financial points in the TPm.  Want to help with that?  I've got some great reliable sources collected already. +++$+++ The bit about the Boston tea party is giving me a nosebleed. Just a cursory read of the latest argument being advanced is off-putting.  There are kids in Europe who know American history better than Americans.  Best to wait a bit until that is all sorted out by others down the line.  I was thinking of starting a new article about the financial points in the TPm.  Want to help with that?  I've got some great reliable sources collected already.[[User:Malke 2010|Malke 2010]] ([[User talk:Malke 2010|talk]]) 02:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
20889 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20888 +++$+++ 20888 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 12:19:00 +++$+++ 1.291580340E09 +++$+++ The main TP article has a severe shortage of enclyclopedic content and a severe shortage of sections that written in an enclyclopedic manner.  Something like this, with cites and overview type content from quality sources in the TPM article itself would be a little step out of it's junk article hole. What do you think?  +++$+++ :The main TP article has a severe shortage of enclyclopedic content and a severe shortage of sections that written in an enclyclopedic manner.  Something like this, with cites and overview type content from quality sources in the TPM article itself would be a little step out of it's junk article hole. What do you think? [[User:North8000|North8000]] ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 12:19, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
20890 +++$+++ Malke 2010 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20888 +++$+++ 20889 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.291595280E09 +++$+++ There seems to be enough for a main article on the fiscal positions.  We could add in a paragraph to the TPm article.  Now that they've voted in this new congress, the pressure is on these newly elected to get things done starting in January when the new term begins.  I think the Republicans are going to disappoint them on some levels.  I read an article about some of the Tea Party Patriots members who are on unemployment, and Scott Brown just voted to end the 99 week unemployment extensions.  He wasn't really a 'tea party candidate,' type, but the Boston Tea Party Patriots supported him. Saw that in the New York Times.  I'll go find it. +++$+++ ::There seems to be enough for a main article on the fiscal positions.  We could add in a paragraph to the TPm article.  Now that they've voted in this new congress, the pressure is on these newly elected to get things done starting in January when the new term begins.  I think the Republicans are going to disappoint them on some levels.  I read an article about some of the Tea Party Patriots members who are on unemployment, and Scott Brown just voted to end the 99 week unemployment extensions.  He wasn't really a 'tea party candidate,' type, but the Boston Tea Party Patriots supported him. Saw that in the New York Times.  I'll go find it.[[User:Malke 2010|Malke 2010]] ([[User talk:Malke 2010|talk]]) 16:28, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
20891 +++$+++ Malke 2010 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20888 +++$+++ 20890 +++$+++ 2010-12-05 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.291595400E09 +++$+++ See [http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/40447966\/ns\/politics-more_politics\/ here].   +++$+++ :::See [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40447966/ns/politics-more_politics/ here].  [[User:Malke 2010|Malke 2010]] ([[User talk:Malke 2010|talk]]) 16:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

609422 +++$+++ Majorly +++$+++ The Haunted Angel +++$+++ 609422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-09 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.165654620E09 +++$+++ The Haunted Angel do you want me to protect this page from trolling? --'''''<font color=\"#002bb8\"> +++$+++ The Haunted Angel do you want me to protect this page from trolling? --'''''<font color="#002bb8">[[User:Majorly|Majo]]</font>''<small><font color="#BA0000">[[User talk:Majorly|rly]]</font></small>''' 00:57, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
609423 +++$+++ The Haunted Angel +++$+++ The Haunted Angel +++$+++ 609422 +++$+++ 609422 +++$+++ 2006-12-09 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.165655280E09 +++$+++ No, it's really ok, I will just proceed to remove all such troll additions as soon as they are added -- I'm not sure how comfortable I would feel with a protected talk page. '''<font color=\"Indigo\"> +++$+++ :No, it's really ok, I will just proceed to remove all such troll additions as soon as they are added -- I'm not sure how comfortable I would feel with a protected talk page. '''<font color="Indigo">[[User:The Haunted Angel|The Haunted Angel]]</font>''' <sup>([[User talk:The Haunted Angel|The Forest Whispers My Name]])</sup> 01:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

20892 +++$+++ Dylan Flaherty +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-06 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.291693200E09 +++$+++ North, I'd like to recommend [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:ViperBlade#Custom_signature_help this help page].  +++$+++ North, I'd like to recommend [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ViperBlade#Custom_signature_help this help page]. [[User:Dylan Flaherty|<font size=3 color=#007f00 face="Script MT Bold">Dylan</font>]] [[User Talk:Dylan Flaherty|<font size=3 color=#007f00 face="Script MT Bold">Flaherty</font>]] 19:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
20893 +++$+++  +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20892 +++$+++ 20892 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks!  You are observant.  Sincerely, <font color =\"blue\">North8000 <\/font> 19:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ :Thanks!  You are observant.  Sincerely, <font color ="blue">North8000 </font> 19:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
20894 +++$+++ Dylan Flaherty +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20892 +++$+++ 20893 +++$+++ 2010-12-06 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.291693800E09 +++$+++ Glad to help. It might be useful for you to check out my [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Dylan_Flaherty\/Sig Sig] definition for a good example of how to get the links working, too.  +++$+++ ::Glad to help. It might be useful for you to check out my [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dylan_Flaherty/Sig Sig] definition for a good example of how to get the links working, too. [[User:Dylan Flaherty|<font size=3 color=#007f00 face="Script MT Bold, cursive">Dylan</font>]] [[User Talk:Dylan Flaherty|<font size=3 color=#007f00 face="Script MT Bold, cursive">Flaherty</font>]] 19:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

283037 +++$+++ Kingboyk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283037 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-24 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.148534220E09 +++$+++ I've left a message which might interest you at [[User_talk:LessHeard_vanU#Edit_summary]]. I've skim read it and it looks pretty good to me. I'd be aiming for a peer review if it were my article. -- +++$+++ I've left a message which might interest you at [[User_talk:LessHeard_vanU#Edit_summary]]. I've skim read it and it looks pretty good to me. I'd be aiming for a peer review if it were my article. --[[User:Kingboyk|kingboyk]] 22:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
283038 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283037 +++$+++ 283037 +++$+++ 2006-05-30 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.149039660E09 +++$+++ I've copied it over our previous talk regarding the Noel Gallagher article. +++$+++ :I've copied it over our previous talk regarding the Noel Gallagher article.[[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 18:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

20896 +++$+++  +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20896 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ OK, that still leaves the second question.  Right now the revised lead sentence essentially says that the community of Boulder Junction is located in the town of boulder junction.  <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000'' <\/font> 18:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ OK, that still leaves the second question.  Right now the revised lead sentence essentially says that the community of Boulder Junction is located in the town of boulder junction.  <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000'' </font> 18:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
20897 +++$+++ RFD +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20896 +++$+++ 20896 +++$+++ 2010-12-13 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.292294340E09 +++$+++ Okay Towns are not incorporated in Wisconsin-see [[Political subdivisions of Wisconsin]]. You are unincorporated communities in Wisconsin. One of the editors was starting unincorporated communities in Wisconsin that have Zipcodes and the unincorporated community of Boulder Junction is one of them and it is located in the town of Boulder Junction. I therefore put the sentence in and moved the paragraph into a different section for easier editing. Please feel free to do editing but the sentence about the unincorporated community of Boluder Junction should stay in. Thank you- +++$+++ :Okay Towns are not incorporated in Wisconsin-see [[Political subdivisions of Wisconsin]]. You are unincorporated communities in Wisconsin. One of the editors was starting unincorporated communities in Wisconsin that have Zipcodes and the unincorporated community of Boulder Junction is one of them and it is located in the town of Boulder Junction. I therefore put the sentence in and moved the paragraph into a different section for easier editing. Please feel free to do editing but the sentence about the unincorporated community of Boluder Junction should stay in. Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 18:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

283041 +++$+++ Bobo6balde66 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283041 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-31 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.149128820E09 +++$+++ its easy to get a picture of Noddy Holder hes the guy from Slade and ill put the sources on the now  +++$+++ its easy to get a picture of Noddy Holder hes the guy from Slade and ill put the sources on the now [[User:Bobo6balde66|Bobo6balde66]] 19:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
283042 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283041 +++$+++ 283041 +++$+++ 2006-06-02 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.149270060E09 +++$+++ Ah, well - at least you didn't say your Gran!*grin*  +++$+++ :Ah, well - at least you didn't say your Gran!*grin* [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 10:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

283043 +++$+++ Brian G. Wilson +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283043 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-06 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.149628800E09 +++$+++ Hi, next time you'll have to complain about ''feline1'' 's unpolite behaviour, I'll not stop you. He deserves to be banned.   +++$+++ Hi, next time you'll have to complain about ''feline1'' 's unpolite behaviour, I'll not stop you. He deserves to be banned.  [[User:Brian G. Wilson|Brian W]] 14:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
283044 +++$+++ Brian G. Wilson +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283043 +++$+++ 283043 +++$+++ 2006-06-06 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.149629400E09 +++$+++ Just look at[[Talk:Fripp & Eno (No Pussyfooting)]]. I admit that sometimes my output may seem ''original research'', but I never insult ppl, unless they insult me(I'll be away for a while, laters).  +++$+++ :Just look at[[Talk:Fripp & Eno (No Pussyfooting)]]. I admit that sometimes my output may seem ''original research'', but I never insult ppl, unless they insult me(I'll be away for a while, laters). [[User:Brian G. Wilson|Brian W]] 14:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

545189 +++$+++ Alterrabe +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545189 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-22 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.211522220E09 +++$+++ Thank you.  I was on my way to alert you to my comment when I found your reply.-- +++$+++ Thank you.  I was on my way to alert you to my comment when I found your reply.--[[User:Alterrabe|Alterrabe]] ([[User talk:Alterrabe|talk]]) 22:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
545190 +++$+++ Ncmvocalist +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545189 +++$+++ 545189 +++$+++ 2008-05-24 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.211668500E09 +++$+++ No problem - it's only changing a few numbers. Thanks for the heads up. :) I do want to modify my view at some stage, but I'll wait for a few things to become clearer first.  +++$+++ :No problem - it's only changing a few numbers. Thanks for the heads up. :) I do want to modify my view at some stage, but I'll wait for a few things to become clearer first. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 15:35, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
545191 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545189 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.211856840E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, this doesn't really belong here but I didn't want to start a new section on the same subject when it doesn't really seem necessary.  I've reviewed my interactions with TheNautalis on the only page we've edited in common (orthomolecular psychiatry).  On that page we didn't have any interactions that struck me as particularly negative, and given that I don't think I will be commenting further on the RFC.  Given WP:SOCK has apparently come up as allowing multiple accounts if segregated (and that's a stupid exception, isn't it?), there is no basis for me having any real complaint about his conduct.  The only thing I could provide would be an external opinion on him by reviewing his contributions, and I don't think I'll have the time for that (plus, what does my opinion matter given a dearth of actual contact?)  I will say that after reviewing his contributions on OMP, I would expect him to conflict with other editors, push for unsourceable statements that promote the \"truth\" of OMP\/OMM, and am not surprised to see issues with interpretation of policy.  But I have never personally hit up against sufficient conflict to be able to comment personally.   +++$+++ :::Hi Tim, this doesn't really belong here but I didn't want to start a new section on the same subject when it doesn't really seem necessary.  I've reviewed my interactions with TheNautalis on the only page we've edited in common (orthomolecular psychiatry).  On that page we didn't have any interactions that struck me as particularly negative, and given that I don't think I will be commenting further on the RFC.  Given WP:SOCK has apparently come up as allowing multiple accounts if segregated (and that's a stupid exception, isn't it?), there is no basis for me having any real complaint about his conduct.  The only thing I could provide would be an external opinion on him by reviewing his contributions, and I don't think I'll have the time for that (plus, what does my opinion matter given a dearth of actual contact?)  I will say that after reviewing his contributions on OMP, I would expect him to conflict with other editors, push for unsourceable statements that promote the "truth" of OMP/OMM, and am not surprised to see issues with interpretation of policy.  But I have never personally hit up against sufficient conflict to be able to comment personally.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] ([[User talk:WLU|talk]]) 19:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

20902 +++$+++ 66.217.118.90 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-17 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.292603400E09 +++$+++ I concurred with the proposal on 22:25, 14 December 2010 (UTC).<br>RB&nbsp; [[Special:Contributions\/66.217.118.90|66.217.118.90]] ( +++$+++ I concurred with the proposal on 22:25, 14 December 2010 (UTC).<br>RB&nbsp; [[Special:Contributions/66.217.118.90|66.217.118.90]] ([[User talk:66.217.118.90|talk]]) 08:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
20903 +++$+++  +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20902 +++$+++ 20902 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I agree with the proposal, and think that it should go forward.  There was probably not enough discussion about that specific proposal to consider the question to be fully discussed and settled, but I think that there was enough to where it wouldn't be out of line to try making the change.  And if there are objections, then it becomes BRD.   Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000'' <\/font> 13:53, 17 December 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ : I agree with the proposal, and think that it should go forward.  There was probably not enough discussion about that specific proposal to consider the question to be fully discussed and settled, but I think that there was enough to where it wouldn't be out of line to try making the change.  And if there are objections, then it becomes BRD.   Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000'' </font> 13:53, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

20904 +++$+++ Fifelfoo +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-20 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.292834220E09 +++$+++ Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.   <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Incidents#Discussion_of_Scope_at_Talk:Libertarianism]]  +++$+++ Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.   <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Discussion_of_Scope_at_Talk:Libertarianism]] [[User:Fifelfoo|Fifelfoo]] ([[User talk:Fifelfoo|talk]]) 00:37, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
20905 +++$+++  +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20904 +++$+++ 20904 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks.  <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000'' <\/font> 14:54, 20 December 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ :Thanks.  <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000'' </font> 14:54, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

20907 +++$+++  +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20907 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-20 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.292885880E09 +++$+++ I nominated the article [[SS Edmund Fitzgerald]] for Good Article review\/status.  <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000'' <\/font> 14:58, 20 December 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ I nominated the article [[SS Edmund Fitzgerald]] for Good Article review/status.  <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000'' </font> 14:58, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
20908 +++$+++  +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20907 +++$+++ 20907 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ A reviewer is requested. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000'' <\/font> 11:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ :A reviewer is requested. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000'' </font> 11:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
20909 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20907 +++$+++ 20908 +++$+++ 2010-12-24 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.293189480E09 +++$+++ I have placed the review on hold so that you could address the indicated issues. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::I have placed the review on hold so that you could address the indicated issues. Thanks, [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 03:18, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
20910 +++$+++  +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20907 +++$+++ 20909 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Thanks.  We'll go to work.  <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000'' <\/font> 03:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ :::Thanks.  We'll go to work.  <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000'' </font> 03:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
20911 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20907 +++$+++ 20910 +++$+++ 2010-12-27 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.293457680E09 +++$+++ There has been a lot of good work on the article. I have left a short list entitled \"Comments after second read on 12\/26\" for you to consider. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::::There has been a lot of good work on the article. I have left a short list entitled "Comments after second read on 12/26" for you to consider. Thanks, [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 05:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
20912 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20907 +++$+++ 20911 +++$+++ 2010-12-27 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.293484260E09 +++$+++ Thanks, and thanks for ''your'' work on the review. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::::Thanks, and thanks for ''your'' work on the review. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 13:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
20913 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20907 +++$+++ 20912 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.293712380E09 +++$+++ I have read the article again and left a few more comments under the \"third read\" heading.  I don't want to be a stick in the mud, but we really should have page-specific references for the direct quotes.  I have pulled the direct quotes from the article and listed them for you.  I hope we can wrap this up promptly, and I will do what I can to expedite this. Thanks,  +++$+++ ::::::I have read the article again and left a few more comments under the "third read" heading.  I don't want to be a stick in the mud, but we really should have page-specific references for the direct quotes.  I have pulled the direct quotes from the article and listed them for you.  I hope we can wrap this up promptly, and I will do what I can to expedite this. Thanks, [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 04:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
20914 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20907 +++$+++ 20913 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 11:45:00 +++$+++ 1.293738300E09 +++$+++ Cool.   We wanted a thorough review; thanks for doing that.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::::::: Cool.   We wanted a thorough review; thanks for doing that.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 11:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

283053 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-09 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.149893580E09 +++$+++ Be careful of using provocative phrases even in reverting what you believe to be vandalism [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Michael_Jackson&curid=3373986&diff=57717819&oldid=57717147].  \"rv vandalism. You can't catch me weirdo\" is inappropriate.  -- +++$+++ Be careful of using provocative phrases even in reverting what you believe to be vandalism [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Jackson&curid=3373986&diff=57717819&oldid=57717147].  "rv vandalism. You can't catch me weirdo" is inappropriate.  --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 15:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
283054 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283053 +++$+++ 283053 +++$+++ 2006-06-17 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.150595040E09 +++$+++ You're still at it.  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Michael_Jackson&diff=prev&oldid=59143593 This] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Michael_Jackson&diff=prev&oldid=58907136 this] show you still using provocative edit summaries.  I'm giving you a last warning. -- +++$+++ : You're still at it.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Jackson&diff=prev&oldid=59143593 This] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Jackson&diff=prev&oldid=58907136 this] show you still using provocative edit summaries.  I'm giving you a last warning. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 18:44, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

283055 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283055 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-17 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.150595340E09 +++$+++ What are you talking about now? I was reverting a POV (and possible vadlised) edit, and giving a reasoned explianation as to why. Where's the provocation in that? Would you rather I not revert such POV edits and compramise the quality of the articles? You've still done nothing about Feline1 and you're monertering every little thing I do, calling me on the smallest, most insignificant things. Are you trying to pick on me or something? That's uncalled for, coz I'm doing good work. I don't need threats of blocking, it's uncalled for. Byeee-- +++$+++ What are you talking about now? I was reverting a POV (and possible vadlised) edit, and giving a reasoned explianation as to why. Where's the provocation in that? Would you rather I not revert such POV edits and compramise the quality of the articles? You've still done nothing about Feline1 and you're monertering every little thing I do, calling me on the smallest, most insignificant things. Are you trying to pick on me or something? That's uncalled for, coz I'm doing good work. I don't need threats of blocking, it's uncalled for. Byeee--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 18:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
283056 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283055 +++$+++ 283055 +++$+++ 2006-06-17 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.150596360E09 +++$+++ Please try to avoid these provocative edit summaries. I can't put this too strongly.  It's one of your few faults as an editor, but it's a very serious one. -- +++$+++ : Please try to avoid these provocative edit summaries. I can't put this too strongly.  It's one of your few faults as an editor, but it's a very serious one. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 19:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

545201 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-31 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.212232560E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Tim. About your note the other day regarding that article, I don't have any sources to hand that I'm aware of, and I've not had time to take a close look at it yet, because I have limited time to spend on WP at the moment. But I definitely will look at some point. <font color=\"Brown\"> +++$+++ Thanks, Tim. About your note the other day regarding that article, I don't have any sources to hand that I'm aware of, and I've not had time to take a close look at it yet, because I have limited time to spend on WP at the moment. But I definitely will look at some point. <font color="Brown">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="darkgreen">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="Light green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|edits]]</font></sup></small> 04:16, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
545202 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545201 +++$+++ 545201 +++$+++ 2008-05-31 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.212234420E09 +++$+++ You need a giant fan trained on your face; in the absence of that, hopefully you'll get some thunder soon. I always go for a walk when it breaks. I miss that kind of weather. :-) <font color=\"Brown\"> +++$+++ :You need a giant fan trained on your face; in the absence of that, hopefully you'll get some thunder soon. I always go for a walk when it breaks. I miss that kind of weather. :-) <font color="Brown">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="darkgreen">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="Light green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|edits]]</font></sup></small> 04:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

283058 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283058 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-11 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.150044780E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=The_Beatles&diff=57984140&oldid=57982808] Please don't partonise my beautiful people. Put a feather in yer cap.-- +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Beatles&diff=57984140&oldid=57982808] Please don't partonise my beautiful people. Put a feather in yer cap.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 09:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
283059 +++$+++ RJN +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283058 +++$+++ 283058 +++$+++ 2006-06-11 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.150076760E09 +++$+++ What was that all about? In addition, please explain to me what you just said or trying to say as I am not familiar with British English. I don't think the comment I left on the edit summary was rude or anything. &mdash; +++$+++ :What was that all about? In addition, please explain to me what you just said or trying to say as I am not familiar with British English. I don't think the comment I left on the edit summary was rude or anything. &mdash;[[User:RJN|RJN]] 18:46, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

615155 +++$+++ H1523702 +++$+++ JonathanDP81 +++$+++ 615155 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-11-24 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.101358080E09 +++$+++ Hi, just to say great improvement to BA page (relocation of destinations).  +++$+++ Hi, just to say great improvement to BA page (relocation of destinations). [[User:H1523702|Mark]] 20:48, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
615156 +++$+++ JonathanDP81 +++$+++ JonathanDP81 +++$+++ 615155 +++$+++ 615155 +++$+++ 2004-11-24 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.101369120E09 +++$+++ Thank you, but not everyone agrees so please post your support at [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion\/Singapore Airlines destinations]] \u2014 +++$+++ *Thank you, but not everyone agrees so please post your support at [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Singapore Airlines destinations]] —[[User:JonathanDP81|JonathanDP81]] ([[User talk:JonathanDP81|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/JonathanDP81|contribs]]) 23:52, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
615157 +++$+++ H1523702 +++$+++ JonathanDP81 +++$+++ 615155 +++$+++ 615156 +++$+++ 2004-11-26 18:55:00 +++$+++ 1.101524100E09 +++$+++ Done! Though if you used my talk page you would have had my support sooner! Looks like the votes are falling your way anyway.  +++$+++ **Done! Though if you used my talk page you would have had my support sooner! Looks like the votes are falling your way anyway. [[User:H1523702|Mark]] 18:55, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

20916 +++$+++ Wpwatchdog +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-30 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.293751080E09 +++$+++ Thank you for fixing my error.  I don't know much about spacing rules so I hope you can fix those problems in the article too?  I am currently working on the notes.  I can match the page numbers to the quotes but may need guidance on correct formatting.-- +++$+++ Thank you for fixing my error.  I don't know much about spacing rules so I hope you can fix those problems in the article too?  I am currently working on the notes.  I can match the page numbers to the quotes but may need guidance on correct formatting.--[[User:Wpwatchdog|Wpwatchdog]] ([[User talk:Wpwatchdog|talk]]) 15:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
20917 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20916 +++$+++ 20916 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.293752160E09 +++$+++ Happy to do any of that. Kind of buried in RL for the next 1\/2 day. Still working on the fix.  I'll finish the section fix this afternoon.   In the meantime, the main thing is to put all notes in the 12\/29 workspace on the main article talk page.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Happy to do any of that. Kind of buried in RL for the next 1/2 day. Still working on the fix.  I'll finish the section fix this afternoon.   In the meantime, the main thing is to put all notes in the 12/29 workspace on the main article talk page.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 15:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
20918 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20916 +++$+++ 20917 +++$+++ 2010-12-30 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.293756660E09 +++$+++ I think the move\/fix is done now. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::I think the move/fix is done now. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 16:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

20919 +++$+++ Wpwatchdog +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20919 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-01 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.293947160E09 +++$+++ I fixed the reference.  It looks like we have more work ahead of us to make FA.-- +++$+++ I fixed the reference.  It looks like we have more work ahead of us to make FA.--[[User:Wpwatchdog|Wpwatchdog]] ([[User talk:Wpwatchdog|talk]]) 21:46, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
20920 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20919 +++$+++ 20919 +++$+++ 2011-01-01 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.293947400E09 +++$+++ Yup.  But I think it will be fun. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Yup.  But I think it will be fun. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 21:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

20921 +++$+++ Wpwatchdog +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-03 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.294052700E09 +++$+++ I think all the issues are resolved for the [[SS Edmund Fitzgerald]] GA review.  I have been working on the reference formatting for the FA review.-- +++$+++ I think all the issues are resolved for the [[SS Edmund Fitzgerald]] GA review.  I have been working on the reference formatting for the FA review.--[[User:Wpwatchdog|Wpwatchdog]] ([[User talk:Wpwatchdog|talk]]) 03:05, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
20922 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20921 +++$+++ 20921 +++$+++ 2011-01-03 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.294053360E09 +++$+++ Looks like we did it!  It's great working with you.  <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Looks like we did it!  It's great working with you.  <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 03:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
20923 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20921 +++$+++ 20922 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 06:14:00 +++$+++ 1.294236840E09 +++$+++ Please feel free to leave questions about GA housekeeping on my talk page, and I will be pleased to help any way that I can.  +++$+++ ::Please feel free to leave questions about GA housekeeping on my talk page, and I will be pleased to help any way that I can. [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 06:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

283066 +++$+++ RadioKirk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283066 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-18 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.150688940E09 +++$+++ The user says \"I must try harder\" and, for the moment, I'm inclined to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]. Meantime, in all honesty, I commend you for your effort to maintain a sense of humor, if perhaps a tad sarcastically. Feel free to write if there are additional issues you feel the two of you have failed to work out. :) <tt style=\"color: #161;\">RadioKirk ( +++$+++ The user says "I must try harder" and, for the moment, I'm inclined to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]. Meantime, in all honesty, I commend you for your effort to maintain a sense of humor, if perhaps a tad sarcastically. Feel free to write if there are additional issues you feel the two of you have failed to work out. :) <tt style="color: #161;">RadioKirk ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</tt> 20:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
283067 +++$+++ Feline1 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283066 +++$+++ 283066 +++$+++ 2006-06-18 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.150691520E09 +++$+++ Crestville, as a man who has written articles on the pleasures of Coming Again and Getting the Horn, I put it to you that you are but Derek to my Clive. I would not dream of disappointing you by failing to provide a suitable rejoinder every time you return to my talk page with another of your bold little messages. I dare say we could quite happily, to paraphrase Basil Fawlty, keep it up until one of us dies. I assure you that these purely personal pleasures between us are not indicative of my avowed intentions to not bite the ankles of wikipedians in general with overly acerbic comments on their work. You might also wish to note,  I do hopefully provide a fair bit of good work on articles, some of my larger works including [[Immanuel Velikovsky]], [[Kraftwerk]], [[The Tourists]] and a multitude of tidbits on various music-related entries. -- +++$+++ :Crestville, as a man who has written articles on the pleasures of Coming Again and Getting the Horn, I put it to you that you are but Derek to my Clive. I would not dream of disappointing you by failing to provide a suitable rejoinder every time you return to my talk page with another of your bold little messages. I dare say we could quite happily, to paraphrase Basil Fawlty, keep it up until one of us dies. I assure you that these purely personal pleasures between us are not indicative of my avowed intentions to not bite the ankles of wikipedians in general with overly acerbic comments on their work. You might also wish to note,  I do hopefully provide a fair bit of good work on articles, some of my larger works including [[Immanuel Velikovsky]], [[Kraftwerk]], [[The Tourists]] and a multitude of tidbits on various music-related entries. --[[User:Feline1|feline1]] 21:32, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

265631 +++$+++ Rosencomet +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265631 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-14 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.163551980E09 +++$+++ You know, these external links to provide citations were begun because YOU kept demanding them. I certainly didn't need the extra work citing every appearance, and then preserving the citations against revertion so that the entire thing was not deleted due to lack of citation. I've said to Samir and to Hanuman Das that if I could be assured it would not cause the information to be deleted, I would be glad to take down many of these external links. But I have also been told that the citations were NECESSARY. How do I preserve my work and satisfy contradictory criticisms?  +++$+++ You know, these external links to provide citations were begun because YOU kept demanding them. I certainly didn't need the extra work citing every appearance, and then preserving the citations against revertion so that the entire thing was not deleted due to lack of citation. I've said to Samir and to Hanuman Das that if I could be assured it would not cause the information to be deleted, I would be glad to take down many of these external links. But I have also been told that the citations were NECESSARY. How do I preserve my work and satisfy contradictory criticisms? [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]] 16:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
265632 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265631 +++$+++ 265631 +++$+++ 2006-11-14 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.163554080E09 +++$+++ (answered on [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]]'s talk page)   +++$+++ *(answered on [[User:Rosencomet|Rosencomet]]'s talk page)  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 17:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

20924 +++$+++ Wpwatchdog +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20924 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-05 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.294285200E09 +++$+++ I kept plugging away at the citations and I think I am at least 3\/4 done.  I deleted and\/or replaced a few citations that I thought would get contested.  We recently had a couple of dead links that I replaced. I haven't checked out the rules for Title Case that Imzadi mentioned.  Do you feel like checking that out?  I still like your idea of trying for FA on November 10.  What kind of time frame did you have for the review?-- +++$+++ I kept plugging away at the citations and I think I am at least 3/4 done.  I deleted and/or replaced a few citations that I thought would get contested.  We recently had a couple of dead links that I replaced. I haven't checked out the rules for Title Case that Imzadi mentioned.  Do you feel like checking that out?  I still like your idea of trying for FA on November 10.  What kind of time frame did you have for the review?--[[User:Wpwatchdog|Wpwatchdog]] ([[User talk:Wpwatchdog|talk]]) 19:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
20925 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20924 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-06 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.294357440E09 +++$+++ I have it figured out. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::I have it figured out. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 15:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
20926 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20924 +++$+++ 20924 +++$+++ 2011-01-05 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.294293180E09 +++$+++ Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 21:53, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

20927 +++$+++ LittleJerry +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20927 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-06 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.294313580E09 +++$+++ Has been fixed, may I label it a GA?  +++$+++ Has been fixed, may I label it a GA? [[User:LittleJerry|LittleJerry]] ([[User talk:LittleJerry|talk]]) 03:33, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
20928 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20927 +++$+++ 20927 +++$+++ 2011-01-06 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.294345020E09 +++$+++ Hello LittleJerry.  I fixed the last item myself (took out the image which appears to have an unsolvable permission problem) and was planning to wait until today to see if I got reverted in which case the article would still have the issue.  I didn't want to say that explicitly because I wanted my edit to stand on its own merits, not stand due to me being the reviewer. I'll pass it today.   Thanks for nominating \/ pointing out such an excellent article and for your fixes. Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Hello LittleJerry.  I fixed the last item myself (took out the image which appears to have an unsolvable permission problem) and was planning to wait until today to see if I got reverted in which case the article would still have the issue.  I didn't want to say that explicitly because I wanted my edit to stand on its own merits, not stand due to me being the reviewer. I'll pass it today.   Thanks for nominating / pointing out such an excellent article and for your fixes. Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 12:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
20929 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20927 +++$+++ 20928 +++$+++ 2011-01-06 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.294353600E09 +++$+++ It is done.<font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::It is done.<font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 14:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

283074 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283074 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-02 09:20:00 +++$+++ 1.151857200E09 +++$+++ Hello, I'd like to invite you to join [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music]].  I see you've done a lot of work on Oasis and Britpop-related articles, and we'd certainly appreciate help from someone more familiar with the British side of things.   +++$+++ Hello, I'd like to invite you to join [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music]].  I see you've done a lot of work on Oasis and Britpop-related articles, and we'd certainly appreciate help from someone more familiar with the British side of things.  [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] 09:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
283075 +++$+++ WesleyDodds +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283074 +++$+++ 283074 +++$+++ 2006-07-04 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.152009540E09 +++$+++ Right now I'm going to be working on [[Britpop]] since I have the references on hand; with the material avaiable I don't see why this shouldn't be a good article once we cite everything.  Basically let's work together on it, and I'll certainly need your help when it comes to proper grammar since I'll for obvious reasons be instinctively writing with American English.  In regards to other British alternative rock, I need help filling out the section on UK alternative on the [[Alternative rock]] page.  As you can see I only got it to about 1995.  I mean, I could bullshit about post-Britpop like Coldplay and recent indie rock like Franz Ferdinand, Bloc Party, and Artic Monkeys, but I really don't now that much about the period in a historical context and you might have better luck putting that in context than I.  Also, if you need any help with any related articles, flag it up on the project talk page.   +++$+++ :Right now I'm going to be working on [[Britpop]] since I have the references on hand; with the material avaiable I don't see why this shouldn't be a good article once we cite everything.  Basically let's work together on it, and I'll certainly need your help when it comes to proper grammar since I'll for obvious reasons be instinctively writing with American English.  In regards to other British alternative rock, I need help filling out the section on UK alternative on the [[Alternative rock]] page.  As you can see I only got it to about 1995.  I mean, I could bullshit about post-Britpop like Coldplay and recent indie rock like Franz Ferdinand, Bloc Party, and Artic Monkeys, but I really don't now that much about the period in a historical context and you might have better luck putting that in context than I.  Also, if you need any help with any related articles, flag it up on the project talk page.  [[User:WesleyDodds|WesleyDodds]] 03:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

545219 +++$+++ Edgar181 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-06 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.212789120E09 +++$+++ Would you mind if I deleted [[:Image:HEPPS.png]] so that a [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Image:HEPPS.png higher resolution version] on Commons could \"show through\" instead?  --  +++$+++ Would you mind if I deleted [[:Image:HEPPS.png]] so that a [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:HEPPS.png higher resolution version] on Commons could "show through" instead?  -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 14:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
545220 +++$+++ Edgar181 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545219 +++$+++ 545219 +++$+++ 2008-06-07 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.212829860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking care of it.  --  +++$+++ :Thanks for taking care of it.  -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 02:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

20932 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-19 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.295439120E09 +++$+++ Thanks again.  <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ Thanks again.  <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 04:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
20933 +++$+++ Fifelfoo +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20932 +++$+++ 20932 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.296077160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pulling [[Talk:Libertarianism]] back to the discussion.  I'm sad that my contribution ends up being 4 paragraphs and four discursive footnotes.   +++$+++ *Thanks for pulling [[Talk:Libertarianism]] back to the discussion.  I'm sad that my contribution ends up being 4 paragraphs and four discursive footnotes.  [[User:Fifelfoo|Fifelfoo]] ([[User talk:Fifelfoo|talk]]) 13:26, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

545221 +++$+++ PeterSymonds +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545221 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-08 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.212969360E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for unprotection|For your reference]]. I declined to unprotect it until you've had your input. Thanks!  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for unprotection|For your reference]]. I declined to unprotect it until you've had your input. Thanks! [[User:PeterSymonds|PeterSymonds]] [[User talk:PeterSymonds|<small>(talk)</small>]] 16:56, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
545222 +++$+++ Kelly +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545221 +++$+++ 545221 +++$+++ 2008-06-08 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.212977520E09 +++$+++ Yeah, why is it protected?  +++$+++ :Yeah, why is it protected? [[User:Kelly|<span style="color:#060;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''Kelly'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kelly|hi!]]</sup> 19:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
545223 +++$+++ Merzul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545221 +++$+++ 545222 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.212999600E09 +++$+++ It is very likely that the subject of the biography beat us to removing BLP violations. Please keep this protected so we can sort this out without offending Dr. Baggini any further. Thanks,  +++$+++ :: It is very likely that the subject of the biography beat us to removing BLP violations. Please keep this protected so we can sort this out without offending Dr. Baggini any further. Thanks, [[User:Merzul|Merzul]] ([[User talk:Merzul|talk]]) 01:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

20934 +++$+++ Kudpung +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-20 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.295540220E09 +++$+++ Hi North. I'm  not  going  to place the L1 [[WP:edit summary|edit summary]] warning here, but I will point out that I was disturbed by the inappropriate edit summary you recently used about a bot when editing [[Calvin Rustrum]], especially  where your complaint appears to be unjustified. -- +++$+++ Hi North. I'm  not  going  to place the L1 [[WP:edit summary|edit summary]] warning here, but I will point out that I was disturbed by the inappropriate edit summary you recently used about a bot when editing [[Calvin Rustrum]], especially  where your complaint appears to be unjustified. --[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 08:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
20935 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20934 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-20 13:35:00 +++$+++ 1.295559300E09 +++$+++ It hit several pet peeves at once.....I stand by the substance of what I said, but should  have used calmer and nicer words. Even if talking about a robot.  <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :: It hit several pet peeves at once.....I stand by the substance of what I said, but should  have used calmer and nicer words. Even if talking about a robot.  <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 13:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

20936 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20936 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-24 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.295937600E09 +++$+++ Please avoid making negative personal comments about your fellow editors, such as unproven allegations of \"gaming the system\" or bias. Such remarks are uncivil. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ Please avoid making negative personal comments about your fellow editors, such as unproven allegations of "gaming the system" or bias. Such remarks are uncivil. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 22:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
20937 +++$+++ Darkstar1st +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20936 +++$+++ 20936 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.295938080E09 +++$+++ '''poppycock''', will, the source clearly said the exact opposite of your edit.   +++$+++ :'''poppycock''', will, the source clearly said the exact opposite of your edit.  [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 22:48, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
20938 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20936 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.295938800E09 +++$+++ (edit conflict) Will, that is a comment about actions, not individuals, so I don't think that \"personal comments\" is correct.  Also, an entire WP guideline is written about and titled gaming, so I don't think that the terminology is uncivil. I really do believe those things about your actions at the moment.  Nevertheless, if you took anything I said personally, then that was opposite what I intended and I apologize.   If you knew me, you would know that I can have spirited, blunt, fast moving,  direct \"opponent\" debates with people that are good friends and who I am privileged to know. ...I completely separate the two. Not knowing me, I could see how such might get misinterpreted.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::(edit conflict) Will, that is a comment about actions, not individuals, so I don't think that "personal comments" is correct.  Also, an entire WP guideline is written about and titled gaming, so I don't think that the terminology is uncivil. I really do believe those things about your actions at the moment.  Nevertheless, if you took anything I said personally, then that was opposite what I intended and I apologize.   If you knew me, you would know that I can have spirited, blunt, fast moving,  direct "opponent" debates with people that are good friends and who I am privileged to know. ...I completely separate the two. Not knowing me, I could see how such might get misinterpreted.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 23:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
20939 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20936 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.295939160E09 +++$+++ Commenting about an action I make is a comment about me. If an edit is incorrect then say, \"there's an error in this material\" rather than saying, \"Editor A is biased and is gaming the system\". &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::::Commenting about an action I make is a comment about me. If an edit is incorrect then say, "there's an error in this material" rather than saying, "Editor A is biased and is gaming the system". &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 23:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
20940 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20936 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.295939880E09 +++$+++ Will, what you say may be often true in real life, but Wikipedia makes a big distinction between talking about actions and talking about people, the former being commonplace and accepted.  But again, if you took anything I said personally, then that was opposite what I intended and I apologize. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::::::Will, what you say may be often true in real life, but Wikipedia makes a big distinction between talking about actions and talking about people, the former being commonplace and accepted.  But again, if you took anything I said personally, then that was opposite what I intended and I apologize. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 23:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
20941 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20936 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.295940240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the apology, which I accept. In the future, remember that \"assume good faith\" is a policy. The guideline, [[WP:GAMING]], says: ''Gaming the system means using Wikipedia policies and guidelines in bad faith to thwart the aims of Wikipedia and the process of communal editorship deliberately.'' Accusing someone of gaming the system is accusing them of acting in bad faith. It's a serious charge which should be accompanied by solid evidence and, if true, should result in remedies. It's not an accusation to make lightly. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::::::Thanks for the apology, which I accept. In the future, remember that "assume good faith" is a policy. The guideline, [[WP:GAMING]], says: ''Gaming the system means using Wikipedia policies and guidelines in bad faith to thwart the aims of Wikipedia and the process of communal editorship deliberately.'' Accusing someone of gaming the system is accusing them of acting in bad faith. It's a serious charge which should be accompanied by solid evidence and, if true, should result in remedies. It's not an accusation to make lightly. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 23:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
20942 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20936 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.295941860E09 +++$+++ Will, without talking about any particular situation, I think that one of the reasons that AGF is a guideline rather than a policy is that it can't be and isn't applied categorically, particularly with my next point in mind, where minor breaches of gaming\/npov become evident.  Gaming can be something as minor and common (and certainly not a serious charge) as using the wp system to promote a POV at the expense of accuracy. Not that any of that particularly applies here. :-)  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::::::::Will, without talking about any particular situation, I think that one of the reasons that AGF is a guideline rather than a policy is that it can't be and isn't applied categorically, particularly with my next point in mind, where minor breaches of gaming/npov become evident.  Gaming can be something as minor and common (and certainly not a serious charge) as using the wp system to promote a POV at the expense of accuracy. Not that any of that particularly applies here. :-)  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 23:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

283082 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283082 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.152341040E09 +++$+++ Yeah, whatever. Funny lad, you are.-- +++$+++ Yeah, whatever. Funny lad, you are.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 23:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
283083 +++$+++ Wazzawazzawaz +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283082 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.152341280E09 +++$+++ Sir, please stop with your arrogance. There is continued vandalism going on, on Wikiquote under username: Crestville, and his page has a link to this page.  You will be blocked if you continue.  Thanks.   +++$+++ ::::Sir, please stop with your arrogance. There is continued vandalism going on, on Wikiquote under username: Crestville, and his page has a link to this page.  You will be blocked if you continue.  Thanks.  [[User:Wazzawazzawaz|Wazzawazzawaz]] 23:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

615159 +++$+++ RoyBoy +++$+++ JonathanDP81 +++$+++ 615159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-12-28 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.104239340E09 +++$+++ Great call on the Category... how the heck did you make that connection\/find; or did you just know that category existed. -- +++$+++ Great call on the Category... how the heck did you make that connection/find; or did you just know that category existed. --[[User:RoyBoy|RoyBoy]] 05:09, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
615160 +++$+++ JonathanDP81 +++$+++ JonathanDP81 +++$+++ 615159 +++$+++ 615159 +++$+++ 2004-12-28 05:27:00 +++$+++ 1.104240420E09 +++$+++ Just stumbled on the category though [[The Shaggs]] and just thought of the sisters. No biggie. \u2014 +++$+++ *Just stumbled on the category though [[The Shaggs]] and just thought of the sisters. No biggie. —[[User:JonathanDP81|JonathanDP81]] ([[User talk:JonathanDP81|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/JonathanDP81|contribs]]) 05:27, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)

283084 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.152341520E09 +++$+++ As well you know that's not me. My user name is CRESTVILLE. His is CRESTVILIE. They look the same but are differant. It's supposedly a joke. Check the \"user contributions\" section and you will find no vandelism, so any attempt to rile me has fallen flat on its face. Hard lines.-- +++$+++ As well you know that's not me. My user name is CRESTVILLE. His is CRESTVILIE. They look the same but are differant. It's supposedly a joke. Check the "user contributions" section and you will find no vandelism, so any attempt to rile me has fallen flat on its face. Hard lines.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 23:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
283085 +++$+++ Wazzawazzawaz +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283084 +++$+++ 283084 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.152341580E09 +++$+++ Okay enough is enough. I'm talking to someone else. Good day lad.  +++$+++ :Okay enough is enough. I'm talking to someone else. Good day lad. [[User:Wazzawazzawaz|Wazzawazzawaz]] 23:53, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

527778 +++$+++ Knulclunk +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527778 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-06 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.181159520E09 +++$+++ Was tagged with full copyright information and watched.  We were given NO WARNING to modify reasoning or rationale.  Not cool. Why was it deleted? Perhaps the image was mistagged Speedy?? Please restore the image, so we can repair the usage trail. -- +++$+++ Was tagged with full copyright information and watched.  We were given NO WARNING to modify reasoning or rationale.  Not cool. Why was it deleted? Perhaps the image was mistagged Speedy?? Please restore the image, so we can repair the usage trail. --[[User:Knulclunk|Knulclunk]] 12:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
527779 +++$+++ Knulclunk +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527778 +++$+++ 527778 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.181161140E09 +++$+++ That's odd, as I did not get a warning, even though I was the uploader and I watch the Sam Gilliam page.  I must have forgotten to ''watch'' the image.  I have no record of the rationale that I used the first time (though as I recall, it seemed fairly solid) Oh well.  Is there ant way I can view the deleted history as a non-admin? Or can you give me an extension to rewrite rationale? -- +++$+++ :That's odd, as I did not get a warning, even though I was the uploader and I watch the Sam Gilliam page.  I must have forgotten to ''watch'' the image.  I have no record of the rationale that I used the first time (though as I recall, it seemed fairly solid) Oh well.  Is there ant way I can view the deleted history as a non-admin? Or can you give me an extension to rewrite rationale? --[[User:Knulclunk|Knulclunk]] 13:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
527780 +++$+++ Knulclunk +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527778 +++$+++ 527779 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.181169300E09 +++$+++ ''If you want, I can restore it, you can pick an appropriate tag from that category, and we can move onward.'' -- That would be very helpful, thanks! -- +++$+++ ::''If you want, I can restore it, you can pick an appropriate tag from that category, and we can move onward.'' -- That would be very helpful, thanks! --[[User:Knulclunk|Knulclunk]] 15:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
527781 +++$+++ Knulclunk +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527778 +++$+++ 527778 +++$+++ 2007-06-07 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.181253180E09 +++$+++ I was checking the image restrictions and I need to get permission from Mr. Gilliam to use it. As that will take a while, go ahead and re-delete the image.  I copied all of my rationale from it and will re-upload it when I have appropriate copyright info.  Thanks for your help. -- +++$+++ :I was checking the image restrictions and I need to get permission from Mr. Gilliam to use it. As that will take a while, go ahead and re-delete the image.  I copied all of my rationale from it and will re-upload it when I have appropriate copyright info.  Thanks for your help. --[[User:Knulclunk|Knulclunk]] 14:53, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

283086 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283086 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 23:54:00 +++$+++ 1.152341640E09 +++$+++ Aye, good luck with that.-- +++$+++ Aye, good luck with that.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 23:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
283087 +++$+++ Wazzawazzawaz +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283086 +++$+++ 283086 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.152341940E09 +++$+++ You have been reported to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents. Good day.  +++$+++ :You have been reported to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Good day. [[User:Wazzawazzawaz|Wazzawazzawaz]] 23:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

20943 +++$+++ CorenSearchBot +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20943 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-30 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.296439980E09 +++$+++ It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article.<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-wikipage-->  +++$+++ It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article.<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-wikipage--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 18:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
20944 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20943 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-01-30 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.296441960E09 +++$+++ It was an article which I started just a couple of weeks ago by expanding a redirect page. To date I have been the only editor.   Now I moved it to wikify the title.<font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC). And yes, I thoroughly recorded and described the situation at both the new name\/article and at the redirect page. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::It was an article which I started just a couple of weeks ago by expanding a redirect page. To date I have been the only editor.   Now I moved it to wikify the title.<font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC). And yes, I thoroughly recorded and described the situation at both the new name/article and at the redirect page. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

20945 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20945 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-31 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.296476520E09 +++$+++ I'm not quite sure what you were trying to do there, but it looks like you tried to make a cut and paste move. ''Please'' don't do that again{{mdash}}it just makes a mess. Please use the move button, though I should point out that article titles shouldn't have a disambiguator unless the title is actually ambiguous with at least one other topic that has a Wikipedia article.  +++$+++ I'm not quite sure what you were trying to do there, but it looks like you tried to make a cut and paste move. ''Please'' don't do that again{{mdash}}it just makes a mess. Please use the move button, though I should point out that article titles shouldn't have a disambiguator unless the title is actually ambiguous with at least one other topic that has a Wikipedia article. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  04:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
20946 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20945 +++$+++ 20945 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 11:48:00 +++$+++ 1.296503280E09 +++$+++ If the title that you moved it to is available (Voyageur) then that is preferable. But I believe that it was a pretty substantial disambiguation page which now appears to be gone. (?) <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :If the title that you moved it to is available (Voyageur) then that is preferable. But I believe that it was a pretty substantial disambiguation page which now appears to be gone. (?) <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 11:48, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
20947 +++$+++ HJ Mitchell +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20945 +++$+++ 20946 +++$+++ 2011-01-31 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.296522360E09 +++$+++ Oh, I got the wrong title. Voyageur'''s''' was where the deleted history was. I've fixed it and merged the two histories back together.  +++$+++ ::Oh, I got the wrong title. Voyageur'''s''' was where the deleted history was. I've fixed it and merged the two histories back together. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  17:06, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

174719 +++$+++ Vamos124 +++$+++ Eeekster +++$+++ 174719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.312182900E09 +++$+++ Hi im not sure if this is the correct way to get in contact with you but you tagged one of my articles http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Klitch_(shoe_clip)&action=purge however I do not understand why as it is completely factual and fully unbiased. I would be very grateful if you could tell me how I can make the article so that it does not get speedily deleted, Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi im not sure if this is the correct way to get in contact with you but you tagged one of my articles http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Klitch_(shoe_clip)&action=purge however I do not understand why as it is completely factual and fully unbiased. I would be very grateful if you could tell me how I can make the article so that it does not get speedily deleted, Thanks. [[User:Vamos124|Vamos124]] ([[User talk:Vamos124|talk]]) 00:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
174720 +++$+++ Eeekster +++$+++ Eeekster +++$+++ 174719 +++$+++ 174719 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.312186620E09 +++$+++ Factual and unbiased isn't enough.  +++$+++ :Factual and unbiased isn't enough. [[User:Eeekster|Eeekster]] ([[User talk:Eeekster#top|talk]]) 01:17, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

20949 +++$+++ BigK HeX +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-02 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.296661800E09 +++$+++ I believe you see that I have been precisely correct the whole time in the recent Libertarianism threads.  As such, I'd appreciate no future lectures on [[WP:AGF]].  It was never needed in the first place, as I'm well-aware of the guidelines, but moreover, I think it's been made pretty clear that your interpretation of the Born2cycle situation was a bit off anyways.  On a side note, note from [[WP:AGF]] that one should \"Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively....\" <nowiki>[<\/nowiki>see [[Wikipedia:Assume_the_assumption_of_good_faith|here]]]. In any case, you've been contributing a lot to the advancement of the Libertarianism article, so keep up the good work.   +++$+++ I believe you see that I have been precisely correct the whole time in the recent Libertarianism threads.  As such, I'd appreciate no future lectures on [[WP:AGF]].  It was never needed in the first place, as I'm well-aware of the guidelines, but moreover, I think it's been made pretty clear that your interpretation of the Born2cycle situation was a bit off anyways.  On a side note, note from [[WP:AGF]] that one should "Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively...." <nowiki>[</nowiki>see [[Wikipedia:Assume_the_assumption_of_good_faith|here]]]. In any case, you've been contributing a lot to the advancement of the Libertarianism article, so keep up the good work.  [[User:BigK HeX|BigK HeX]] ([[User talk:BigK HeX|talk]]) 07:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
20950 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20949 +++$+++ 20949 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.296683880E09 +++$+++ Hello BigK.  Whether I was right or wrong, I honestly saw you as the only one still viewing this as primarily a war situation, and my ONLY  goal was to convince you that that period is at least temporarily gone.   Let's call what I was doing a matter of promoting my perception of the situation, (including from various one on one communications with folks on both \"sides\")      My email is north9000  (9000, not 8000)    at    gmail    should you ever want the simpler discussion of touching base one on one. (noticed that you do not have email enabled)   All of that aside, here's the actual big picture: thank you for the nice words, my compliments on your expert WP contributions in even the most complex areas, and it's a pleasure and privilege to know you and work with you.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Hello BigK.  Whether I was right or wrong, I honestly saw you as the only one still viewing this as primarily a war situation, and my ONLY  goal was to convince you that that period is at least temporarily gone.   Let's call what I was doing a matter of promoting my perception of the situation, (including from various one on one communications with folks on both "sides")      My email is north9000  (9000, not 8000)    at    gmail    should you ever want the simpler discussion of touching base one on one. (noticed that you do not have email enabled)   All of that aside, here's the actual big picture: thank you for the nice words, my compliments on your expert WP contributions in even the most complex areas, and it's a pleasure and privilege to know you and work with you.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 13:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
20951 +++$+++ BigK HeX +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20949 +++$+++ 20950 +++$+++ 2011-02-02 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.296698460E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I just felt a little attacked (in a very small way), and that the AGF bit may have distracted a little from the various issues at hand.  In any case, it's good to see that things seem to be on their way towards adding citations and ideas for improved material due to your efforts.   Your dedication is enviable.  +++$+++ :: Thanks.  I just felt a little attacked (in a very small way), and that the AGF bit may have distracted a little from the various issues at hand.  In any case, it's good to see that things seem to be on their way towards adding citations and ideas for improved material due to your efforts.   Your dedication is enviable. [[User:BigK HeX|BigK HeX]] ([[User talk:BigK HeX|talk]]) 18:01, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

509912 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ AmiDaniel +++$+++ 509912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-29 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.148961960E09 +++$+++ Now that the computer with VandalProof and the Query program is connected to the net again, I did some poking. [[Apple]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation]] got results like charm. It was when I added the subpage ([[Wikipedia:Articles for creation\/Today]]) when it returned 'Article not found'. I think it doesn't recognize subpages. Can you remedy this? It would be a great help at AFC and other processes that are prone to receiving unsigned comments (like Ref Desk subpages). -  +++$+++ Now that the computer with VandalProof and the Query program is connected to the net again, I did some poking. [[Apple]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation]] got results like charm. It was when I added the subpage ([[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Today]]) when it returned 'Article not found'. I think it doesn't recognize subpages. Can you remedy this? It would be a great help at AFC and other processes that are prone to receiving unsigned comments (like Ref Desk subpages). - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 21:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
509913 +++$+++ AmiDaniel +++$+++ AmiDaniel +++$+++ 509912 +++$+++ 509912 +++$+++ 2006-05-29 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.148962680E09 +++$+++ Hmmm, I think I may have found the problem. Somehow I input that %2F should be converted to a colon (\":\") rather than a slash(\"\/\"). Is it erroring when you start the query or when you initially load the page? I can't understand wonder why this would make a difference upon ''loading'' the page. Let me play around a little bit, and once I think I have it fixed I'll upload a patch. Thanks for your patience.  +++$+++ :Hmmm, I think I may have found the problem. Somehow I input that %2F should be converted to a colon (":") rather than a slash("/"). Is it erroring when you start the query or when you initially load the page? I can't understand wonder why this would make a difference upon ''loading'' the page. Let me play around a little bit, and once I think I have it fixed I'll upload a patch. Thanks for your patience. [[User:AmiDaniel|AmiDaniel]] ([[User talk:AmiDaniel|talk]]) 21:18, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
509914 +++$+++ 131.211.210.17 +++$+++ AmiDaniel +++$+++ 509912 +++$+++ 509912 +++$+++ 2006-05-31 08:56:00 +++$+++ 1.149090960E09 +++$+++ I have the problem when I try to load the page in question. I can load the program itself without any error messages. -  +++$+++ *I have the problem when I try to load the page in question. I can load the program itself without any error messages. - [[User:131.211.210.17|131.211.210.17]] 08:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

20952 +++$+++ Digiphi +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-10 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.297335300E09 +++$+++ Sorry for leaving you guys hanging, somewhat,  on the TPM issue a hundred years ago. RL kind of collapsed on me and I've only just been dug out. No, I wasn't in jail. - +++$+++ Sorry for leaving you guys hanging, somewhat,  on the TPM issue a hundred years ago. RL kind of collapsed on me and I've only just been dug out. No, I wasn't in jail. -[[User:Digiphi|<font face="Garamond">Digiphi</font>]] ([[User talk:Digiphi|<font face="Cambria"><font color="teal">Talk</font></font>]]) 02:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
20953 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20952 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-10 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.297338420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the note and welcome back! Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::Thanks for the note and welcome back! Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 03:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

283097 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283097 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-11 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.152679260E09 +++$+++ So far as I can tell, it is not being vandelised.-- +++$+++ So far as I can tell, it is not being vandelised.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 21:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
283098 +++$+++ Rebelguys2 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283097 +++$+++ 283097 +++$+++ 2006-07-11 21:46:00 +++$+++ 1.152679560E09 +++$+++ I didn't protect the page; I just added the notice. The page was protected at 14:03 at 28 June 2006 by [[User:Alkivar]]. His reasoning was, \"libel postings mean this needs to go back to semi.\" I don't know what this is referring to, but it is customary to leave the semi-protection notice up there until the issue is resolved. &mdash; ''' +++$+++ :I didn't protect the page; I just added the notice. The page was protected at 14:03 at 28 June 2006 by [[User:Alkivar]]. His reasoning was, "libel postings mean this needs to go back to semi." I don't know what this is referring to, but it is customary to leave the semi-protection notice up there until the issue is resolved. &mdash; '''[[User:Rebelguys2|Rebelguys2]]''' <sup><font color="#CC5500">[[User talk:Rebelguys2|talk]]</font></sup> 21:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

20954 +++$+++ Natural RX +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20954 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-13 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.297648860E09 +++$+++ Hi there, I noticed you were a member of [[WP:ONTARIO]]. I was wondering if I could ask you to weigh in on [[Talk:Greenbelt (Golden Horseshoe)#Move?|a discussion]] to move [[Greenbelt (Golden Horseshoe)]] to [[Ontario Greenbelt]]. The discussion is stagnant, and I'd like to gather some consensus. Thanks. --''' +++$+++ Hi there, I noticed you were a member of [[WP:ONTARIO]]. I was wondering if I could ask you to weigh in on [[Talk:Greenbelt (Golden Horseshoe)#Move?|a discussion]] to move [[Greenbelt (Golden Horseshoe)]] to [[Ontario Greenbelt]]. The discussion is stagnant, and I'd like to gather some consensus. Thanks. --'''[[User:Natural RX|<font color="#000000">Natural</font>]] [[User talk:Natural RX|<font color="#228b22">R</font><sub><font color="#000000">X</font></sub>]]''' 18:01, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
20955 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20954 +++$+++ 20954 +++$+++ 2011-02-13 21:53:00 +++$+++ 1.297662780E09 +++$+++ Happy to.  I'll have to get up to speed on it first. Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Happy to.  I'll have to get up to speed on it first. Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 21:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

20956 +++$+++ Peter jackson +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20956 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-22 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.298414040E09 +++$+++ I've added a comment of yours here.  +++$+++ I've added a comment of yours here. [[User:Peter jackson|Peter jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter jackson|talk]]) 14:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
20957 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20956 +++$+++ 20956 +++$+++ 2011-02-22 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.298415420E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  I'm flattered! <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Thanks.  I'm flattered! <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 14:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

545246 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545246 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-21 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.214083740E09 +++$+++ Argh. I had a deadline due yesterday, and simply couldn't put RL on hold to do more here. I do hope I'll be able to help out more now and still maintain some distance\u2014I'm fighting the urge to <s>hack away at the article<\/s> become involved.  +++$+++ Argh. I had a deadline due yesterday, and simply couldn't put RL on hold to do more here. I do hope I'll be able to help out more now and still maintain some distance—I'm fighting the urge to <s>hack away at the article</s> become involved. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 14:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
545247 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545246 +++$+++ 545246 +++$+++ 2008-06-21 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.214084400E09 +++$+++ Yes, I agree. I'll start by removing the copy-pasted stuff (abstracts! PI sections!). Copyvio trumps content dispute, and it's a step towards getting the article into more encyclopedic shape.  +++$+++ :Yes, I agree. I'll start by removing the copy-pasted stuff (abstracts! PI sections!). Copyvio trumps content dispute, and it's a step towards getting the article into more encyclopedic shape. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 14:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
545248 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545246 +++$+++ 545247 +++$+++ 2008-06-22 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.214184000E09 +++$+++ I'm fine with unprotection, but I think we should hold Literaturegeek and TheGoodSon to the revert parole originally suggested by AndonicO on their Talk pages\u20140RR, no tolerance: disagree with an edit, take it to the Talk page.  +++$+++ ::I'm fine with unprotection, but I think we should hold Literaturegeek and TheGoodSon to the revert parole originally suggested by AndonicO on their Talk pages—0RR, no tolerance: disagree with an edit, take it to the Talk page. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 18:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
545249 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545246 +++$+++ 545248 +++$+++ 2008-06-22 18:28:00 +++$+++ 1.214184480E09 +++$+++ Sure, seems only fair; 0RR and trial unprotection it is, then :)  +++$+++ :::Sure, seems only fair; 0RR and trial unprotection it is, then :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 18:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

283105 +++$+++ Thivierr +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283105 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-14 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.152936300E09 +++$+++ Please note, that per [[Wikipedia:Fair use criteria]], policy dictates we can never use a fair use image, if a free image exists.  Since we have a free image of Michael Jackson, we can never use any non-free image, as the lead image, such as the one you added.  This applies, regardless of whether one image is more current, or looks better.  -- +++$+++ Please note, that per [[Wikipedia:Fair use criteria]], policy dictates we can never use a fair use image, if a free image exists.  Since we have a free image of Michael Jackson, we can never use any non-free image, as the lead image, such as the one you added.  This applies, regardless of whether one image is more current, or looks better.  --[[User:Thivierr|Rob]] 21:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
283106 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283105 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-15 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.152992580E09 +++$+++ Yeah I already knew that. I just didn't realise it wasn't on commons. Someone told me it was. I've explained all this to Drmagic. He is quite content to whinge that people are reveting edits but is too lazy to actually read the image policy pages (I think he once asked me to \"read it for [him]\") and so never quite understands what is going on. Typical Yank.-- +++$+++ :: Yeah I already knew that. I just didn't realise it wasn't on commons. Someone told me it was. I've explained all this to Drmagic. He is quite content to whinge that people are reveting edits but is too lazy to actually read the image policy pages (I think he once asked me to "read it for [him]") and so never quite understands what is going on. Typical Yank.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 12:43, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

20962 +++$+++ Philg88 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-28 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.301308320E09 +++$+++ Hi, Please have a look at the comment in the FA submission section of the article's talk page. Since you nominated it last time it's your baby :) Best,  +++$+++ Hi, Please have a look at the comment in the FA submission section of the article's talk page. Since you nominated it last time it's your baby :) Best, [[User:Philg88|<span style="color:#646464; font-weight:bold; font-size:11px; border:2px solid #FFCC33;background-color:#cde0fc; padding: 2px 10px;">►&nbsp;Philg88&nbsp;◄</span>]] <sup>[[File:star.png|11px]][[User_talk:Philg88|talk]]</sup> 03:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
20963 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20962 +++$+++ 20962 +++$+++ 2011-03-28 08:05:00 +++$+++ 1.301324700E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  Good idea and I responded there.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Thanks.  Good idea and I responded there.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 08:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
20964 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20962 +++$+++ 20963 +++$+++ 2011-04-17 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.303063620E09 +++$+++ Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 11:07, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

545253 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545253 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-22 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.214193960E09 +++$+++ [[Archaea|Another FA in the making?]]  +++$+++ [[Archaea|Another FA in the making?]] [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 21:06, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
545254 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545253 +++$+++ 545253 +++$+++ 2008-06-22 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.214194860E09 +++$+++ I sure hope so.  This article is much better than its current rating suggests, and is listed on [[Wikipedia:Vital articles]]. -- +++$+++ :I sure hope so.  This article is much better than its current rating suggests, and is listed on [[Wikipedia:Vital articles]]. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 21:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

20966 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20966 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-25 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.303782840E09 +++$+++ I caught your insinuation about a Wikipedia editor gaming or \"''using''\" poorly written Wikipedia policies to push a POV.  I am disappointed.   +++$+++ I caught your insinuation about a Wikipedia editor gaming or "''using''" poorly written Wikipedia policies to push a POV.  I am disappointed.  [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 18:54, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
20967 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20966 +++$+++ 20966 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.303783260E09 +++$+++ It is not a personal attack.   It is a very low key description and critique of what you have been doing at the article, certain areas of which are an identical topic as the one raised at AN, and I feel one that is accurate and useful to bring up in order to eventually make progress there. And this is said after about 6 months of observation.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :It is not a personal attack.   It is a very low key description and critique of what you have been doing at the article, certain areas of which are an identical topic as the one raised at AN, and I feel one that is accurate and useful to bring up in order to eventually make progress there. And this is said after about 6 months of observation.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 19:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
20968 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20966 +++$+++ 20967 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.303784820E09 +++$+++ In the interest of \"making progress\", could you please provide the [[WP:DIFF|diff]] of one example of this gaming policy to push a POV?  You say \"what you have been doing\" as if there should be many such instances, so producing one example should not be a burden.  It would be greatly appreciated.  Regards,  +++$+++ ::In the interest of "making progress", could you please provide the [[WP:DIFF|diff]] of one example of this gaming policy to push a POV?  You say "what you have been doing" as if there should be many such instances, so producing one example should not be a burden.  It would be greatly appreciated.  Regards, [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 19:27, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
20969 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20966 +++$+++ 20968 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.303786500E09 +++$+++ Your last edit at TPM article. You chose the phrase that sounds most extreme to put in, even if you know it to not generally be true\/representative (and thus is uninformative) Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::Your last edit at TPM article. You chose the phrase that sounds most extreme to put in, even if you know it to not generally be true/representative (and thus is uninformative) Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 19:55, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
20970 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20966 +++$+++ 20969 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.303787040E09 +++$+++ The edit to which you refer is a simple revert of a deletion.  I read the cited source, noted that the text correctly conveyed what the source said, and reverted the deletion.  It's not my \"pov\", and I wasn't the person that introduced that text in the first place.  So I reiterate my request:  Just one example, please. Regards,  +++$+++ ::::The edit to which you refer is a simple revert of a deletion.  I read the cited source, noted that the text correctly conveyed what the source said, and reverted the deletion.  It's not my "pov", and I wasn't the person that introduced that text in the first place.  So I reiterate my request:  Just one example, please. Regards, [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 20:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
20971 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20966 +++$+++ 20970 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.303787760E09 +++$+++ If I knew it was a revert, then I would not have said \"chose\", and now retract that word.  The rest still stands.  You put in a statement that says the it is a position of the Tea Party movement \"When necessary, they favor total war and unconditional surrender over limited wars for limited goals\", which IMHO has all of the above-described problems. Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::::If I knew it was a revert, then I would not have said "chose", and now retract that word.  The rest still stands.  You put in a statement that says the it is a position of the Tea Party movement "When necessary, they favor total war and unconditional surrender over limited wars for limited goals", which IMHO has all of the above-described problems. Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 20:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
20972 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20966 +++$+++ 20971 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.303788360E09 +++$+++ I reverted a deletion of sourced content, correct. I do not understand what you mean by \"all of the above-described problems\".  Problems you have with what the cited source says?  Can you please specifically indicate which Wikipedia policy is being gamed, and how, in your given example?  +++$+++ ::::::I reverted a deletion of sourced content, correct. I do not understand what you mean by "all of the above-described problems".  Problems you have with what the cited source says?  Can you please specifically indicate which Wikipedia policy is being gamed, and how, in your given example? [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 20:26, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
20973 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20966 +++$+++ 20971 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.303790040E09 +++$+++ Alternatively, if you cannot show that your chosen example illustrates the gaming of poorly written Wikipedia policies to push a POV, perhaps you could cite another example that does?  Just one.  You see, you've made quite a serious charge \u2014 one that I feel is unfounded and highly inaccurate \u2014 and I'm still hoping we can resolve this between the two of us, without requesting comment from other editors.  If I have done something untoward (it was certainly unintentional), how am I supposed to take corrective action or address it by way of explanation, if you won't specify what it is?  +++$+++ ::::::Alternatively, if you cannot show that your chosen example illustrates the gaming of poorly written Wikipedia policies to push a POV, perhaps you could cite another example that does?  Just one.  You see, you've made quite a serious charge — one that I feel is unfounded and highly inaccurate — and I'm still hoping we can resolve this between the two of us, without requesting comment from other editors.  If I have done something untoward (it was certainly unintentional), how am I supposed to take corrective action or address it by way of explanation, if you won't specify what it is? [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 20:54, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
20974 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20966 +++$+++ 20973 +++$+++ 2011-04-25 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.303791240E09 +++$+++ The example I gave does that, and I explained how it does that.  What you are IMHO doing is common practice in Wikipedia and not considered \"serious\"...it violates the spirit\/intent\/goal of the policies (particularly wp:npov) but, by definition, does not violate the letter of them. '''The only thing that I would consider a serious offense, and then only if it wasn't an honest error, is mislabeling my comments as a personal attack.'''   If you are interested in a sincere and friendly exchange to sort this out further, then I would be happy to do that. Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::::::The example I gave does that, and I explained how it does that.  What you are IMHO doing is common practice in Wikipedia and not considered "serious"...it violates the spirit/intent/goal of the policies (particularly wp:npov) but, by definition, does not violate the letter of them. '''The only thing that I would consider a serious offense, and then only if it wasn't an honest error, is mislabeling my comments as a personal attack.'''   If you are interested in a sincere and friendly exchange to sort this out further, then I would be happy to do that. Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 21:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

283111 +++$+++ RadioKirk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283111 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-19 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.153312560E09 +++$+++ Whatever differences you have had with fellow editors, edits like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Pepperstool&diff=prev&oldid=64444998 this one] can demonstrate that you are prone to being provoked beyond the boundaries of  [[WP:CIVIL|civility]]. Please consider that, belittled though we may feel, responding in kind damages our efforts to collaborate on the sum total of human knowledge. Please be mindful, and thank you. <tt style=\"color:#161;\">RadioKirk<small> ( +++$+++ Whatever differences you have had with fellow editors, edits like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pepperstool&diff=prev&oldid=64444998 this one] can demonstrate that you are prone to being provoked beyond the boundaries of  [[WP:CIVIL|civility]]. Please consider that, belittled though we may feel, responding in kind damages our efforts to collaborate on the sum total of human knowledge. Please be mindful, and thank you. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 05:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
283112 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283111 +++$+++ 283111 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.153350840E09 +++$+++ You're right. Make a nice mantra-- +++$+++ :You're right. Make a nice mantra--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 16:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
283113 +++$+++ RadioKirk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283111 +++$+++ 283112 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.153354980E09 +++$+++ Reply to both of you on my user talk page. <tt style=\"color:#161;\">RadioKirk<small> ( +++$+++ ::Reply to both of you on my user talk page. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 17:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
283114 +++$+++ RadioKirk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283111 +++$+++ 283113 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.153372620E09 +++$+++ People don't always \"get it\" immediately&mdash;and, people don't always deserve to be called \"vandals\". <tt style=\"color:#161;\">RadioKirk<small> ( +++$+++ :::People don't always "get it" immediately&mdash;and, people don't always deserve to be called "vandals". <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 22:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
283115 +++$+++ RadioKirk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283111 +++$+++ 283114 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.153373220E09 +++$+++ I've looked at the talk page and I see you being flip. Do you have diffs to demonstrate the accusation of sockpuppetry? <tt style=\"color:#161;\">RadioKirk<small> ( +++$+++ ::::I've looked at the talk page and I see you being flip. Do you have diffs to demonstrate the accusation of sockpuppetry? <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 22:27, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
283116 +++$+++ RadioKirk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283111 +++$+++ 283115 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.153397280E09 +++$+++ Alright, I've looked at the recent history as you've pointed out to me and, yes, this person is adding some scorching POV to articles (and even [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:RadioKirk&diff=prev&oldid=64674366 admitting so]). At the same time, yes, there '''are''' some [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Bad_Love_%28Randy_Newman_album%29&diff=prev&oldid=54530912 legitimate] (if heavy on the POV) edits from this user you wish to utterly dismiss as a vandal and to whom you respond with such diatribes as \"[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Don%27t_Believe_the_Truth&diff=63264654&oldid=63229071 I find the condecending edit offencive. Go and listen to Hard-Fi in your country villa, you upper middle class, lower lower intelligence snob. BTW, I'm not on the dole you four letter word.]\" I am '''not''' saying to '''you''', \"[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARadioKirk&diff=64745130&oldid=64743476 maybe we should be nice to him because...]\", I'm saying we must '''all''' abide by [[WP:CIVIL]]&mdash;you to him, him to me, me to you, etc.&mdash;otherwise that policy goes to hell in a handbasket. I'm also saying, sometimes, working together is impossible, so we must sometimes work apart. Meantime, I will again remind the user about [[WP:NOR]] and [[WP:NPOV]] as two more policies by which we must all abide. <tt style=\"color:#161;\">RadioKirk<small> ( +++$+++ :::::Alright, I've looked at the recent history as you've pointed out to me and, yes, this person is adding some scorching POV to articles (and even [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RadioKirk&diff=prev&oldid=64674366 admitting so]). At the same time, yes, there '''are''' some [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bad_Love_%28Randy_Newman_album%29&diff=prev&oldid=54530912 legitimate] (if heavy on the POV) edits from this user you wish to utterly dismiss as a vandal and to whom you respond with such diatribes as "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Don%27t_Believe_the_Truth&diff=63264654&oldid=63229071 I find the condecending edit offencive. Go and listen to Hard-Fi in your country villa, you upper middle class, lower lower intelligence snob. BTW, I'm not on the dole you four letter word.]" I am '''not''' saying to '''you''', "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARadioKirk&diff=64745130&oldid=64743476 maybe we should be nice to him because...]", I'm saying we must '''all''' abide by [[WP:CIVIL]]&mdash;you to him, him to me, me to you, etc.&mdash;otherwise that policy goes to hell in a handbasket. I'm also saying, sometimes, working together is impossible, so we must sometimes work apart. Meantime, I will again remind the user about [[WP:NOR]] and [[WP:NPOV]] as two more policies by which we must all abide. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 05:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
283117 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283111 +++$+++ 283111 +++$+++ 2006-07-19 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.153335660E09 +++$+++ More dismissive really.-- +++$+++ :More dismissive really.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 12:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

545258 +++$+++ Alextrevelian 006 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-23 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.214269740E09 +++$+++ Sure, any section in particular? The article seems pretty good so far, but I notice something in the talk page. Living in space is quite possible, a fact remarked by [[ALH84001]] and the current NASA mission in Mars. Since archaea microorganisms are the most basic life form it should be notice the possibility of a link via theory of Panspermia. You also suggested using the same schematics as the bacteria article. About the relations with other organisms there is a image showing that archaea is a major component of plankton, being plankton as the bottom of any aquatic food chain archaea has a major importance in the carbon and energy cycle. Please talk me if you have more ideas about it. -- +++$+++ Sure, any section in particular? The article seems pretty good so far, but I notice something in the talk page. Living in space is quite possible, a fact remarked by [[ALH84001]] and the current NASA mission in Mars. Since archaea microorganisms are the most basic life form it should be notice the possibility of a link via theory of Panspermia. You also suggested using the same schematics as the bacteria article. About the relations with other organisms there is a image showing that archaea is a major component of plankton, being plankton as the bottom of any aquatic food chain archaea has a major importance in the carbon and energy cycle. Please talk me if you have more ideas about it. --[[User:Alextrevelian 006|ometzit&lt;col&gt;]] ([[User talk:Alextrevelian 006|talk]]) 18:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
545259 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545258 +++$+++ 545258 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.214296440E09 +++$+++ Yes, Archaea are common in the plankton, and yes plankton forms an important base of the \"food chain\", but that does not mean that ''archaeal'' plankton is an important part of the food chain.  Archaeal biochemistry is radically different from bacteria and eukaryotes.  I'm not aware of an studies showing that archaeal membranes can be metabolized by other organisms, or that they form any significant fraction of any organism's diet.  If you know of such a study, it would help.  Without such a study, any text written about the role of Archaea in the food chain would be entirely speculative. -- +++$+++ :Yes, Archaea are common in the plankton, and yes plankton forms an important base of the "food chain", but that does not mean that ''archaeal'' plankton is an important part of the food chain.  Archaeal biochemistry is radically different from bacteria and eukaryotes.  I'm not aware of an studies showing that archaeal membranes can be metabolized by other organisms, or that they form any significant fraction of any organism's diet.  If you know of such a study, it would help.  Without such a study, any text written about the role of Archaea in the food chain would be entirely speculative. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 01:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
545260 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545258 +++$+++ 545259 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.214297040E09 +++$+++ But they're not just ''ether'' lipids, they're also enantiomers and isoprene-based.  The handedness would require a different set of enzymes, yes? -- +++$+++ ::But they're not just ''ether'' lipids, they're also enantiomers and isoprene-based.  The handedness would require a different set of enzymes, yes? --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 01:44, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
545261 +++$+++ Alextrevelian 006 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545258 +++$+++ 545260 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.214302320E09 +++$+++ Not entirely, I mean many carbon-based energy sources are so different but using the same array of enzymes all of them can be diverted into a simple one like glucose or any saccharide. I am not aware of the diferences between the composition of archaea and prokaryote membrane, but if they cannot be used as carbon sources then their ecosystems would lack the entire base for energy cycle and therefore be locked in inorganic sources. The image in the infobox should be a microorganism of importance and relevance to the archaea. I sugges Pyrococcus.-- +++$+++ :::Not entirely, I mean many carbon-based energy sources are so different but using the same array of enzymes all of them can be diverted into a simple one like glucose or any saccharide. I am not aware of the diferences between the composition of archaea and prokaryote membrane, but if they cannot be used as carbon sources then their ecosystems would lack the entire base for energy cycle and therefore be locked in inorganic sources. The image in the infobox should be a microorganism of importance and relevance to the archaea. I sugges Pyrococcus.--[[User:Alextrevelian 006|ometzit&lt;col&gt;]] ([[User talk:Alextrevelian 006|talk]]) 03:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
545262 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545258 +++$+++ 545261 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.214303040E09 +++$+++ You can find more information about fundamental membrane chemistry differences in the [[Archaea]] article; the differences are rather profound and require ''different'' enzymes for handling the backwards molecules.  I do not understand what you mean by \"their ecosystems would lack the entire base for energy cycle\", sine an ecosystem does not depend on any one species.  If you can provide an image of ''Pyrococcus'', that would be great, but the article has the best image of an archaean currently available at Commons. -- +++$+++ ::::You can find more information about fundamental membrane chemistry differences in the [[Archaea]] article; the differences are rather profound and require ''different'' enzymes for handling the backwards molecules.  I do not understand what you mean by "their ecosystems would lack the entire base for energy cycle", sine an ecosystem does not depend on any one species.  If you can provide an image of ''Pyrococcus'', that would be great, but the article has the best image of an archaean currently available at Commons. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 03:24, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
545263 +++$+++ Alextrevelian 006 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545258 +++$+++ 545262 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.214304660E09 +++$+++ Ummm well handling the \"backwards\" molecules would require a isomerase which is, in fact a pretty simple enzyme present in many life forms but I\xb4m not gonna fall in original research and claim that for fact. About the energy cycle, forget about it I was just thinking that archaeal ecosystem like acid mine drainage or underwater thermal vents would (it could) be locked to extremophiles, lithotrophs would be in environmental advantage against heterotrophs. Now this article [http:\/\/aem.asm.org\/cgi\/content\/abstract\/66\/11\/4829] mentions that archaea compose over 60% of plankton as a oceanic microbial community. -- +++$+++ :::::Ummm well handling the "backwards" molecules would require a isomerase which is, in fact a pretty simple enzyme present in many life forms but I´m not gonna fall in original research and claim that for fact. About the energy cycle, forget about it I was just thinking that archaeal ecosystem like acid mine drainage or underwater thermal vents would (it could) be locked to extremophiles, lithotrophs would be in environmental advantage against heterotrophs. Now this article [http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/66/11/4829] mentions that archaea compose over 60% of plankton as a oceanic microbial community. --[[User:Alextrevelian 006|ometzit&lt;col&gt;]] ([[User talk:Alextrevelian 006|talk]]) 03:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
545264 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545258 +++$+++ 545263 +++$+++ 2008-06-24 14:17:00 +++$+++ 1.214342220E09 +++$+++ Correction: The article says that Archaea made up 60% of the ''prokaryotic'' plankton, but only 14-43% of cells counted.  That figure ignores multicellular plankton such as animal larvae. -- +++$+++ ::::::Correction: The article says that Archaea made up 60% of the ''prokaryotic'' plankton, but only 14-43% of cells counted.  That figure ignores multicellular plankton such as animal larvae. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 14:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

588473 +++$+++ Hoof Hearted +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ 588473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-06 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.196980740E09 +++$+++ I'd like your feedback on my proposal at [[Template Talk:cbb link]].   +++$+++ I'd like your feedback on my proposal at [[Template Talk:cbb link]].  [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] ([[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk]]) 14:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
588474 +++$+++ Hoof Hearted +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ 588473 +++$+++ 588473 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.197065280E09 +++$+++ Is there a better way to do this, or are we saying the same thing?  Won't <nowiki>{{subst:cbb link...}}<\/nowiki> still call the ifexist function?  +++$+++ :Is there a better way to do this, or are we saying the same thing?  Won't <nowiki>{{subst:cbb link...}}</nowiki> still call the ifexist function? [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] ([[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk]]) 14:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
588475 +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ MECU +++$+++ 588473 +++$+++ 588474 +++$+++ 2007-12-07 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.197074580E09 +++$+++ We're talking about the same thing. subst: will still run the functions (unfortunately) and not just replace with the season article.  +++$+++ ::We're talking about the same thing. subst: will still run the functions (unfortunately) and not just replace with the season article. [[User:Mecu|<font color="CEBE70">'''MECU'''</font>]]≈<small>[[User talk:Mecu|talk]]</small> 16:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

20975 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20975 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-25 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.303798560E09 +++$+++ I asked you for an example to support your attack.  You cited my revert of this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Tea_Party_movement&diff=425755743&oldid=424765833 deletion of sourced content], and if I understand your latest response above, you say my revert \"violates the spirit\/intent\/goal of the policies (particularly wp:npov)\".  It does not; and despite my repeated request that you explain the violation, you have not.  Your attempt to soften your attack by now saying, instead of the violation of gaming the policies to push a POV, I'm merely violating the \"spirit\" of the policies, is still a personal attack and equally incorrect and unsubstantiated.  If you wish to stand by your unsubstantiated attack, that is certainly your prerogative; I will take this matter elsewhere for wider review.  If it were an isolated incident, which it is not <small>(\"...to try to game the system to see how many negative sounding linkages ... one can torture into the article to pursue the personal agendas of editors. For those who can't follow this higher calling there are only the policies and guidelines,\" etc.)<\/small>, or if a retraction or apology were forthcoming, which doesn't appear likely, it would be easy to let this episode pass.  Unfortunately, it appears to me to be an ongoing problem that should be firmly addressed. Regards,  +++$+++ I asked you for an example to support your attack.  You cited my revert of this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tea_Party_movement&diff=425755743&oldid=424765833 deletion of sourced content], and if I understand your latest response above, you say my revert "violates the spirit/intent/goal of the policies (particularly wp:npov)".  It does not; and despite my repeated request that you explain the violation, you have not.  Your attempt to soften your attack by now saying, instead of the violation of gaming the policies to push a POV, I'm merely violating the "spirit" of the policies, is still a personal attack and equally incorrect and unsubstantiated.  If you wish to stand by your unsubstantiated attack, that is certainly your prerogative; I will take this matter elsewhere for wider review.  If it were an isolated incident, which it is not <small>("...to try to game the system to see how many negative sounding linkages ... one can torture into the article to pursue the personal agendas of editors. For those who can't follow this higher calling there are only the policies and guidelines," etc.)</small>, or if a retraction or apology were forthcoming, which doesn't appear likely, it would be easy to let this episode pass.  Unfortunately, it appears to me to be an ongoing problem that should be firmly addressed. Regards, [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 23:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
20976 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20975 +++$+++ 20975 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.303801800E09 +++$+++ My characterization has been consistent all along.  The only serious violation that you are committing is incorrectly labeling the things I has said as \"personal attacks.\" which is itself a personal attack. I think that you are quite confused about what constitutes acceptable behavior.  You are committing unacceptable behavior to attack acceptable comments that you do not care for.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :My characterization has been consistent all along.  The only serious violation that you are committing is incorrectly labeling the things I has said as "personal attacks." which is itself a personal attack. I think that you are quite confused about what constitutes acceptable behavior.  You are committing unacceptable behavior to attack acceptable comments that you do not care for.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 00:10, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
20977 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20975 +++$+++ 20976 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.303814100E09 +++$+++ Thank you for at least acknowledging that I \"do not care for\" your personal attacks.  It is unfortunate that you, in light of that, still let them stand.  So we disagree on what is acceptable, and what is not, with regard to your comments about other editors.  Fair enough.  It is for that reason that I shall request input from a wider audience.  Regards,  +++$+++ ::Thank you for at least acknowledging that I "do not care for" your personal attacks.  It is unfortunate that you, in light of that, still let them stand.  So we disagree on what is acceptable, and what is not, with regard to your comments about other editors.  Fair enough.  It is for that reason that I shall request input from a wider audience.  Regards, [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 03:35, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
20978 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20975 +++$+++ 20977 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.303840200E09 +++$+++ Everything above involves talking past me, repetitively mis-characterizing what I said and never addressing what I said.  Even this last post includes this mis-characterization (as false implied premises) three times,   The writing is of the type that attempts to mislead other readers rather than communicate with me. There does not appear to be any real conversation going on here.   If you ever want to have a sincere conversation I am ready, but please no more of the above.   Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::Everything above involves talking past me, repetitively mis-characterizing what I said and never addressing what I said.  Even this last post includes this mis-characterization (as false implied premises) three times,   The writing is of the type that attempts to mislead other readers rather than communicate with me. There does not appear to be any real conversation going on here.   If you ever want to have a sincere conversation I am ready, but please no more of the above.   Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 10:50, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
20979 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20975 +++$+++ 20978 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.303870860E09 +++$+++ I came here for a \"sincere conversation\", but instead you have given me the above.  If communication with you on this relatively simple matter is any indication, then I certainly do not look forward to collaborating with you on controversial Wikipedia articles that we may have in common.  Regards,  +++$+++ ::::I came here for a "sincere conversation", but instead you have given me the above.  If communication with you on this relatively simple matter is any indication, then I certainly do not look forward to collaborating with you on controversial Wikipedia articles that we may have in common.  Regards, [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 19:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
20980 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20975 +++$+++ 20979 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.303871460E09 +++$+++ My last post still applies.  This includes the offer remaining open. Sincerely,<font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::::My last post still applies.  This includes the offer remaining open. Sincerely,<font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 19:31, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
20981 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20975 +++$+++ 20980 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.303882200E09 +++$+++ I'd rather not have to endure more of the above, so I respectfully decline your offer.  Instead, I have requested input from other editors [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Unfounded_accusations_of_gaming_Wiki-policies_to_push_POV_in_articles|here]].  Regards,  +++$+++ ::::::I'd rather not have to endure more of the above, so I respectfully decline your offer.  Instead, I have requested input from other editors [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Unfounded_accusations_of_gaming_Wiki-policies_to_push_POV_in_articles|here]].  Regards, [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 22:30, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
20982 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20975 +++$+++ 20981 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.303885380E09 +++$+++ That's a good idea. Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::::::That's a good idea. Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 23:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
20983 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20975 +++$+++ 20982 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.304279100E09 +++$+++ The result is [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Unfounded_accusations_of_gaming_Wiki-policies_to_push_POV_in_articles|here]]. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::::::::The result is [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Unfounded_accusations_of_gaming_Wiki-policies_to_push_POV_in_articles|here]]. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 12:45, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

265640 +++$+++ Balajiviswanathan +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265640 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-15 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.163645460E09 +++$+++ Regarding Badrinath Temple, I just moved the contents from the existing article [[Badrinath]], as we wanted it to describe about the town. I didnt spend much time on editing that. You could comment all the contents out, and I'll work on them, when I find time.  +++$+++ Regarding Badrinath Temple, I just moved the contents from the existing article [[Badrinath]], as we wanted it to describe about the town. I didnt spend much time on editing that. You could comment all the contents out, and I'll work on them, when I find time. [[User:Balajiviswanathan|Balajiviswanathan]] 18:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
265641 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265640 +++$+++ 265640 +++$+++ 2006-11-15 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.163646180E09 +++$+++ You make it sound like these are your articles. They are Wikipedia's articles. It is wrong to move contents from one article to another without consulting with other people on the Discussion page and getting consensus first.   +++$+++ :You make it sound like these are your articles. They are Wikipedia's articles. It is wrong to move contents from one article to another without consulting with other people on the Discussion page and getting consensus first.  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 19:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

545267 +++$+++ Wikiality123 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545267 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-24 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.214347620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your message. The article seems to be brilliantly written. Good work. I guess you are aiming for a GA atleast for this. I think the lead may be have to be rewritten so as to summarise the whole article. I would do it myself if I were good at it, but unfortunately am not. :D I also have a question about [[:Image:Collapsed tree labels simplified.png|this image]]. What is this tree based on, ''id est'' what genes? You might want to state that in the legend. I know that it is easy to comment on your hardwork. Honestly thats not my intention. Cheers <font color=\"Orange\"><b> +++$+++ Thanks for your message. The article seems to be brilliantly written. Good work. I guess you are aiming for a GA atleast for this. I think the lead may be have to be rewritten so as to summarise the whole article. I would do it myself if I were good at it, but unfortunately am not. :D I also have a question about [[:Image:Collapsed tree labels simplified.png|this image]]. What is this tree based on, ''id est'' what genes? You might want to state that in the legend. I know that it is easy to comment on your hardwork. Honestly thats not my intention. Cheers <font color="Orange"><b>[[User:Wikiality123|Wiki San Roze]]</b></font><sup><i> <font color="green">[[User talk:Wikiality123|†αLҝ]]</font></i></sup> 15:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
545268 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545267 +++$+++ 545267 +++$+++ 2008-06-25 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.214449380E09 +++$+++ Why withdraw the GA nom?  By keeping the GA nom going, the article can be eligible to receive GA status, even if it should fail or be delayed at FA.  -- +++$+++ :Why withdraw the GA nom?  By keeping the GA nom going, the article can be eligible to receive GA status, even if it should fail or be delayed at FA.  --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 20:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
545269 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545267 +++$+++ 545268 +++$+++ 2008-06-25 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.214449680E09 +++$+++ It's not a rule I've ever seen.  It's not mentioned at the FA criteria. -- +++$+++ ::It's not a rule I've ever seen.  It's not mentioned at the FA criteria. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey#top|talk]]) 20:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

283124 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283124 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-21 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.153518000E09 +++$+++ I\xb4m really glad you didn\xb4t mind, but when I saw the red link it was instinctive to change it. (I\xb4d had a few tins as well, hic...) I didn\xb4t think about it, I just did it. Does that mean I\xb4m getting to be a Wiki-head? (New word) or a Wikiholic? (I will not entertain the idea that I may be a \"Wikiwanker...\") Ho-hum. I will never find a link to my old school, because they tore it down and spread salt over the ground where it stood, just to make sure...  +++$+++ I´m really glad you didn´t mind, but when I saw the red link it was instinctive to change it. (I´d had a few tins as well, hic...) I didn´t think about it, I just did it. Does that mean I´m getting to be a Wiki-head? (New word) or a Wikiholic? (I will not entertain the idea that I may be a "Wikiwanker...") Ho-hum. I will never find a link to my old school, because they tore it down and spread salt over the ground where it stood, just to make sure... [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 14:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
283125 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283124 +++$+++ 283124 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.153536180E09 +++$+++ I would not entertain that idea either. It was very nice. But is there anything sadder than coming on wikipedia pissed? I always feel guilty afterwards, like I own myself better than that.-- +++$+++ :I would not entertain that idea either. It was very nice. But is there anything sadder than coming on wikipedia pissed? I always feel guilty afterwards, like I own myself better than that.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 19:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

283127 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283127 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-20 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.153429680E09 +++$+++ Good grief, waiting for the final decision on the Beatles trivia page is like having a baby. That is a POV, because I have never had the experience of having a bowling ball pass through my colon, or an umbrella being fully opened in my anus.  +++$+++ Good grief, waiting for the final decision on the Beatles trivia page is like having a baby. That is a POV, because I have never had the experience of having a bowling ball pass through my colon, or an umbrella being fully opened in my anus. [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 14:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
283128 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283127 +++$+++ 283127 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.153430040E09 +++$+++ You haven't lived-- +++$+++ :You haven't lived--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 14:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
283129 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283127 +++$+++ 283128 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.153430400E09 +++$+++ You did it again. (Sound of man holding stomach and making \"guffawing\" sounds...)  +++$+++ ::You did it again. (Sound of man holding stomach and making "guffawing" sounds...) [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 14:20, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

20984 +++$+++ Enric Naval +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20984 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-27 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.303937520E09 +++$+++ In [[Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability#Support]], threaded discussion is supposed to go in the \"discussion\" section (because it usually results in the \"support\" and \"oppose\" sections being filled with unwieldy amounts of text), and you were being counted twice. I grouped your two comments together. -- +++$+++ In [[Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability#Support]], threaded discussion is supposed to go in the "discussion" section (because it usually results in the "support" and "oppose" sections being filled with unwieldy amounts of text), and you were being counted twice. I grouped your two comments together. --[[User:Enric Naval|Enric Naval]] ([[User talk:Enric Naval|talk]]) 13:52, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
20985 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20984 +++$+++ 20984 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.303938480E09 +++$+++ Not following exactly, but it sounds cool.  Thanks for doing it and thanks for telling me. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Not following exactly, but it sounds cool.  Thanks for doing it and thanks for telling me. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 14:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

20986 +++$+++ Circeus +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20986 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-07 01:24:00 +++$+++ 1.304756640E09 +++$+++ Hey. I was wondering if you had specific issues with the {{tl|harv}}\/{{tl|sfn}} family of templates? I ask because I noticed the article makes use exclusively of manually built cross-referencing which can nowadays be made much more easily with these templates. I'm originally not a fan of them myself, but since I do a lot of reference copyediting (something which, unfortunately, tends to be overlooked at FAC), I've been trying my hand at them recently and if you're interested, I wouldn't mind applying them (and probably the {{code|ref<nowiki>=<\/nowiki>harv}} parameter that autogenerate crossreferences with the footnote templates) to simplify the article and tighten the look of the source code.  +++$+++ Hey. I was wondering if you had specific issues with the {{tl|harv}}/{{tl|sfn}} family of templates? I ask because I noticed the article makes use exclusively of manually built cross-referencing which can nowadays be made much more easily with these templates. I'm originally not a fan of them myself, but since I do a lot of reference copyediting (something which, unfortunately, tends to be overlooked at FAC), I've been trying my hand at them recently and if you're interested, I wouldn't mind applying them (and probably the {{code|ref<nowiki>=</nowiki>harv}} parameter that autogenerate crossreferences with the footnote templates) to simplify the article and tighten the look of the source code. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 01:24, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
20987 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20986 +++$+++ 20986 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 02:36:00 +++$+++ 1.304760960E09 +++$+++ Thanks again.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Thanks again.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 02:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
20988 +++$+++ Circeus +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20986 +++$+++ 20987 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.304767140E09 +++$+++ Will ask them. As it is, unless I make a huge mistake, most probably nobody will be able to tell there was any change, since everything will be behind the scenes (except for the fact the default for {{tl|sfn}} is a parentheses-less form), and as I said earlier, the FAC crew, for all their effort, rarely give the referencing style more than a cursory look.  +++$+++ ::Will ask them. As it is, unless I make a huge mistake, most probably nobody will be able to tell there was any change, since everything will be behind the scenes (except for the fact the default for {{tl|sfn}} is a parentheses-less form), and as I said earlier, the FAC crew, for all their effort, rarely give the referencing style more than a cursory look. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 04:19, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
20989 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20986 +++$+++ 20988 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.304796660E09 +++$+++ Cool.  If WPWatchdog is cool with it, (as I see they are) so am I. Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::Cool.  If WPWatchdog is cool with it, (as I see they are) so am I. Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 12:31, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
20990 +++$+++ Wpwatchdog +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20986 +++$+++ 20989 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.304800920E09 +++$+++ I'm cool with it.-- +++$+++ ::::I'm cool with it.--[[User:Wpwatchdog|Wpwatchdog]] ([[User talk:Wpwatchdog|talk]]) 13:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

283131 +++$+++ Patthedog +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283131 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-20 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.153444140E09 +++$+++ Hi, Yes I like it. It makes you want to open the album articles where you should be presented with a concise accurate history of each one (I think!).  However, ''Please Please Me'' is pretty awful. The others are better although ramble on a bit. I feel there's a lot that could be just stripped out. Possibly better to have less than more, and build on that. But visually seeing all of the album covers is great, makes me want to go and play them all.-- +++$+++ Hi, Yes I like it. It makes you want to open the album articles where you should be presented with a concise accurate history of each one (I think!).  However, ''Please Please Me'' is pretty awful. The others are better although ramble on a bit. I feel there's a lot that could be just stripped out. Possibly better to have less than more, and build on that. But visually seeing all of the album covers is great, makes me want to go and play them all.--[[User:Patthedog|Patthedog]] 18:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
283132 +++$+++ Patthedog +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283131 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-20 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.153448460E09 +++$+++ I don\u2019t think sixty-niners had been invented yet in 1963! I pretty sure it was mutual masturbation although I can\u2019t put my finger on it. -- +++$+++ ::I don’t think sixty-niners had been invented yet in 1963! I pretty sure it was mutual masturbation although I can’t put my finger on it. --[[User:Patthedog|Patthedog]] 19:21, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

545278 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-18 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.213834800E09 +++$+++ Tim, sample Dispatches, published in the [[WP:SIGNPOST|Signpost]] are at {{t1|FCDW}}; would working on [[Wikipedia talk:Featured content dispatch workshop#Who_wants_June_30_.3F.3F|this with Laser brain interest you]]?  Please respond over there to keep it all in one place, and if you decide to participate, the temporary workspace will be [[WP:FCDW\/June 30, 2008]].  +++$+++ Tim, sample Dispatches, published in the [[WP:SIGNPOST|Signpost]] are at {{t1|FCDW}}; would working on [[Wikipedia talk:Featured content dispatch workshop#Who_wants_June_30_.3F.3F|this with Laser brain interest you]]?  Please respond over there to keep it all in one place, and if you decide to participate, the temporary workspace will be [[WP:FCDW/June 30, 2008]]. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
545279 +++$+++ Laser_brain +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545278 +++$+++ 545278 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.213848720E09 +++$+++ Tim, no problem!  There are plenty of dispatches to go around. :) -- +++$+++ : Tim, no problem!  There are plenty of dispatches to go around. :) --[[User:Laser_brain|<font color="purple">'''Laser brain'''</font >]] [[User_talk:Laser_brain|<font color="purple">(talk)</font >]] 21:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

283136 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283136 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-25 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.153879560E09 +++$+++ When I found out it was you, I had a good laugh. Grrr....  +++$+++ When I found out it was you, I had a good laugh. Grrr.... [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 19:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
283137 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283136 +++$+++ 283136 +++$+++ 2006-07-25 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.153882080E09 +++$+++ I 'ad a feeling that were it. It was an insult, so I didn't sign it.-- +++$+++ : I 'ad a feeling that were it. It was an insult, so I didn't sign it.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 19:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

545281 +++$+++ AndrewGNF +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545281 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-27 05:50:00 +++$+++ 1.214571000E09 +++$+++ Tim, quick question that I'm hoping you'll know the quick answer to.  Is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=ITK_%28gene%29&diff=222024422&oldid=217794754 this change] (coupled with {{tl|PBB}} and [[ITK_(gene)\/PBB]]) an acceptable way to (re)structure PBB pages?  I think it really cleans up the the [[ITK (gene)|main gene page]].  Especially for newbie editors, that template code is a tough thing to wade through to find the relevant sections to edit...  Just not sure if it runs afoul of [[WP:SUBPAGE]] though...  Thoughts appreciated.  (Credit to [[User:David D.|David D.]] for the idea...)   +++$+++ Tim, quick question that I'm hoping you'll know the quick answer to.  Is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ITK_%28gene%29&diff=222024422&oldid=217794754 this change] (coupled with {{tl|PBB}} and [[ITK_(gene)/PBB]]) an acceptable way to (re)structure PBB pages?  I think it really cleans up the the [[ITK (gene)|main gene page]].  Especially for newbie editors, that template code is a tough thing to wade through to find the relevant sections to edit...  Just not sure if it runs afoul of [[WP:SUBPAGE]] though...  Thoughts appreciated.  (Credit to [[User:David D.|David D.]] for the idea...)  [[User:AndrewGNF|AndrewGNF]] ([[User talk:AndrewGNF|talk]]) 05:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
545282 +++$+++ AndrewGNF +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545281 +++$+++ 545281 +++$+++ 2008-06-28 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.214637900E09 +++$+++ Thanks Tim, good suggestion from you led to a good suggestion from the village pump.  Hopefully we'll [[Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Help_modifying_ProteinBoxBot_pages|find a volunteer]] to do the coding (while we're in between students right now)...  +++$+++ :Thanks Tim, good suggestion from you led to a good suggestion from the village pump.  Hopefully we'll [[Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Help_modifying_ProteinBoxBot_pages|find a volunteer]] to do the coding (while we're in between students right now)... [[User:AndrewGNF|AndrewGNF]] ([[User talk:AndrewGNF|talk]]) 00:25, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

20995 +++$+++ Count Iblis +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-11 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.305162360E09 +++$+++ I started the proposed policy [[Wikipedia:Government]] yesterday, motivated by deadlocks like e.g. now on the Verifiability page. If you are interested, you can help to develop it further.  +++$+++ I started the proposed policy [[Wikipedia:Government]] yesterday, motivated by deadlocks like e.g. now on the Verifiability page. If you are interested, you can help to develop it further. [[User:Count Iblis|Count Iblis]] ([[User talk:Count Iblis|talk]]) 18:06, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
20996 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20995 +++$+++ 20995 +++$+++ 2011-05-11 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.305164040E09 +++$+++ Thanks and I'm flattered by the invitation.  I read it quick and will read it again and noodle on it.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Thanks and I'm flattered by the invitation.  I read it quick and will read it again and noodle on it.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:34, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

20997 +++$+++ Michael P. Barnett +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-12 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.305187680E09 +++$+++ Are there guidelines \/ suggestions on how people who started to edit using their real names and then became subjects of articles should contribute to articles \/ discussions on matters on which their contributions in the outside world were significant parts of their professional activities? I do not feel that this should give their opinions extra weight -- perhaps avoiding the citation of one's own work should hold even more strongly in this situation. I even wonder if there is a COI. I post the question here, because you noticed and mentioned that I am both editor and subject. I did not want to inject this into the verifiability discussion. I have to leave further comment on the Determinants article, the verifiability of leads, and the need for articles about mathematics to be open to general editorship (after all, I am NOT a mathematician) for now.  +++$+++ Are there guidelines / suggestions on how people who started to edit using their real names and then became subjects of articles should contribute to articles / discussions on matters on which their contributions in the outside world were significant parts of their professional activities? I do not feel that this should give their opinions extra weight -- perhaps avoiding the citation of one's own work should hold even more strongly in this situation. I even wonder if there is a COI. I post the question here, because you noticed and mentioned that I am both editor and subject. I did not want to inject this into the verifiability discussion. I have to leave further comment on the Determinants article, the verifiability of leads, and the need for articles about mathematics to be open to general editorship (after all, I am NOT a mathematician) for now. [[User:Michael P. Barnett|Michael P. Barnett]] ([[User talk:Michael P. Barnett|talk]]) 01:08, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
20998 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20997 +++$+++ 20997 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 10:28:00 +++$+++ 1.305221280E09 +++$+++ But beyond that, my suggestion is that \"you worry too much about this stuff\"; just jump in and start discussing at the article's talk page and then start editing there. (I'll watch the article for a while, and would be happy to insert a comment to break the ice)  As I described in more detail at wp:ver, I think that you misread the situation at the article; I think that others there were waiting for you to offer ideas,discussion and edits. An easy mistake to make because when you entered Wikipeda you jumped down the rabbit hole, and now have to learn how things operate in this rough-and-tumble but fun parallel universe!   Enjoy! And certainly let me know if I can be of any help.   Sincerely,  <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :But beyond that, my suggestion is that "you worry too much about this stuff"; just jump in and start discussing at the article's talk page and then start editing there. (I'll watch the article for a while, and would be happy to insert a comment to break the ice)  As I described in more detail at wp:ver, I think that you misread the situation at the article; I think that others there were waiting for you to offer ideas,discussion and edits. An easy mistake to make because when you entered Wikipeda you jumped down the rabbit hole, and now have to learn how things operate in this rough-and-tumble but fun parallel universe!   Enjoy! And certainly let me know if I can be of any help.   Sincerely,  <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 10:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
20999 +++$+++ Michael P. Barnett +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20997 +++$+++ 20998 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.305400080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Michael P. Barnett|Michael P. Barnett]] ([[User talk:Michael P. Barnett|talk]]) 12:08, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
21000 +++$+++  +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 20997 +++$+++ 20999 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Hello Michael, thanks for the message.  You are so cautious and polite that there is nothing that you could  conceivably do that I would consider discourteous. And answering your question, I would not consider that to be discourteous. I do re-assert my advice which is essentially that you being so so polite and so so cautious (combined with not yet fully understanding the mysterious ways of Wikipedia) is causing you to fundamentally mis-read the situation.  Again, I'm always ready and eager to help or talk if you care to.   Thanks again for the message.  Sincerely, North8000 13:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ :::Hello Michael, thanks for the message.  You are so cautious and polite that there is nothing that you could  conceivably do that I would consider discourteous. And answering your question, I would not consider that to be discourteous. I do re-assert my advice which is essentially that you being so so polite and so so cautious (combined with not yet fully understanding the mysterious ways of Wikipedia) is causing you to fundamentally mis-read the situation.  Again, I'm always ready and eager to help or talk if you care to.   Thanks again for the message.  Sincerely, North8000 13:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

545286 +++$+++ Wikiality123 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545286 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-27 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.214613360E09 +++$+++ This is just to avoid confusion the Actinobacteria as Gram negetives and is also more accurate with the current taxonomic hierarchy. I am assuming that you have the raw data file and it would be of better quality if you did it rather than me trying to mess up with your beautiful image file. You may also be interested in [http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/7704574 this paper] where they argue based on HSP that Archaea are more related to Gram-positive bacteria and Gram negetives are related to the Eukaryotes. I have a huge phylogenetic tree based on HSP70, but unfortunately can't put it on here since its unpublished. Anyways, I guess this would be an interesting info to add on to the article. <font color=\"Orange\"><b> +++$+++ This is just to avoid confusion the Actinobacteria as Gram negetives and is also more accurate with the current taxonomic hierarchy. I am assuming that you have the raw data file and it would be of better quality if you did it rather than me trying to mess up with your beautiful image file. You may also be interested in [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7704574 this paper] where they argue based on HSP that Archaea are more related to Gram-positive bacteria and Gram negetives are related to the Eukaryotes. I have a huge phylogenetic tree based on HSP70, but unfortunately can't put it on here since its unpublished. Anyways, I guess this would be an interesting info to add on to the article. <font color="Orange"><b>[[User:Wikiality123|Wiki San Roze]]</b></font><sup><i> <font color="green">[[User talk:Wikiality123|†αLҝ]]</font></i></sup> 17:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
545287 +++$+++ Wikiality123 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545286 +++$+++ 545286 +++$+++ 2008-06-28 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.214640780E09 +++$+++ Yes indeed! Thanks <font color=\"Orange\"><b> +++$+++ :Yes indeed! Thanks <font color="Orange"><b>[[User:Wikiality123|Wiki San Roze]]</b></font><sup><i> <font color="green">[[User talk:Wikiality123|†αLҝ]]</font></i></sup> 01:13, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

283143 +++$+++ Patthedog +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283143 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-29 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.154185380E09 +++$+++ I think I need some advice please. I\u2019ve been trying to reorganize the \"[[Please Please Me]]\" album article. So far I\u2019ve rewritten the opening section and the cover and further down rewritten \u201cI Saw Her Standing There\u201d \u201cMisery\u201d \u201cAsk Me Why\u201d and \u201cLove Me Do\u201d. The thing is: am I wasting my time as a lot of this is repeated as articles elsewhere, although, in my opinion, not as lovingly put together as mine!? What do you think?-- +++$+++ I think I need some advice please. I’ve been trying to reorganize the "[[Please Please Me]]" album article. So far I’ve rewritten the opening section and the cover and further down rewritten “I Saw Her Standing There” “Misery” “Ask Me Why” and “Love Me Do”. The thing is: am I wasting my time as a lot of this is repeated as articles elsewhere, although, in my opinion, not as lovingly put together as mine!? What do you think?--[[User:Patthedog|Patthedog]] 08:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
283144 +++$+++ Patthedog +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283143 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.154278380E09 +++$+++ Right. Many thanks for looking at all of this. I shall carry on then until I either keel over or I\u2019m arrested. Citations aren\u2019t a problem, I\u2019ll put them in. Sorry about the ''Nothing was ever going be the same again, but we just had to wait a little longer\u2026\u2026\u201d.'' bit, I just got carried away. With  ''\"And the fact that it had been written by two members of the group meant that it broke the mould\u201d'' I was trying to say that up until The Beatles came along, groups would be given material to record. It was most unusual, and in fact, quite outrageous to want to do your own stuff. \u201cLove Me Do\u201d then was really very different in that respect (especially as it was their first single). Suppose I rephrase it or use a quote? Anyway, I\u2019ll do as you suggest with the song articles. I think I could be in for quite a bumpy ride though! So far I\u2019ve just been splashing around in some backwater as I don\u2019t think the Please Please Me (album) article can be on that many watchlists. I can\u2019t be the only person though that thinks the songs (probably all of them!) need tidying up? Ok then, where are those books\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026?(I must stop doing that)-- +++$+++ ::Right. Many thanks for looking at all of this. I shall carry on then until I either keel over or I’m arrested. Citations aren’t a problem, I’ll put them in. Sorry about the ''Nothing was ever going be the same again, but we just had to wait a little longer……”.'' bit, I just got carried away. With  ''"And the fact that it had been written by two members of the group meant that it broke the mould”'' I was trying to say that up until The Beatles came along, groups would be given material to record. It was most unusual, and in fact, quite outrageous to want to do your own stuff. “Love Me Do” then was really very different in that respect (especially as it was their first single). Suppose I rephrase it or use a quote? Anyway, I’ll do as you suggest with the song articles. I think I could be in for quite a bumpy ride though! So far I’ve just been splashing around in some backwater as I don’t think the Please Please Me (album) article can be on that many watchlists. I can’t be the only person though that thinks the songs (probably all of them!) need tidying up? Ok then, where are those books…………?(I must stop doing that)--[[User:Patthedog|Patthedog]] 09:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

576839 +++$+++ Acroterion +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-30 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.283202780E09 +++$+++ Are there any specific images you'd like for me to get when I'm in Glacier\/Waterton Lakes NP in September? I'll be there, Yellowstone, central Idaho, Salt Lake City and points in between, so if there's something that's missing in one of your many Montana-related articles, I'll try to get it. When I get back, maybe I'll be motivated to tackle the summary article on [[Historic structures of Glacier National Park]] that I promised back int he spring. '''<font face=\"Arial\"> +++$+++ Are there any specific images you'd like for me to get when I'm in Glacier/Waterton Lakes NP in September? I'll be there, Yellowstone, central Idaho, Salt Lake City and points in between, so if there's something that's missing in one of your many Montana-related articles, I'll try to get it. When I get back, maybe I'll be motivated to tackle the summary article on [[Historic structures of Glacier National Park]] that I promised back int he spring. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 14:13, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
576840 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 11:07:00 +++$+++ 1.283278020E09 +++$+++ OOOH....lemme go with you! Well, I'd have to quit my job so can't do that. Are you sticking to the roads or going backcountry? Let me look over what is missing and get back to you in a day or less.-- +++$+++ :OOOH....lemme go with you! Well, I'd have to quit my job so can't do that. Are you sticking to the roads or going backcountry? Let me look over what is missing and get back to you in a day or less.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 11:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
576841 +++$+++ Acroterion +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576840 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.283280660E09 +++$+++ It'll have to be near the roads, unless I can arrange for new hips for my wife in the next week and a half. Specifically, starting in SLC, up through Craters of the Moon, Ketchum, the Bitterroot Valley, Missoula, Columbia Falls, a couple of days in Glacier\/Waterton Lakes, back down the east side of the mountains around Chouteau, and then four days of undefined activities in  Ennis\/Yellowstone\/Grand Teton, Jackson, down to Park City, and back East. For what it's worth, my Droid will show Google Maps with the Wikipedia overlay, so I can see where the mountain peaks or other subjects with articles are in a topo or satellite context. I figured I could do wide reference shots for context so I could identify things later, then individual shots of peaks. This will depend on weather, schedule, and my wife's patience. '''<font face=\"Arial\"> +++$+++ ::It'll have to be near the roads, unless I can arrange for new hips for my wife in the next week and a half. Specifically, starting in SLC, up through Craters of the Moon, Ketchum, the Bitterroot Valley, Missoula, Columbia Falls, a couple of days in Glacier/Waterton Lakes, back down the east side of the mountains around Chouteau, and then four days of undefined activities in  Ennis/Yellowstone/Grand Teton, Jackson, down to Park City, and back East. For what it's worth, my Droid will show Google Maps with the Wikipedia overlay, so I can see where the mountain peaks or other subjects with articles are in a topo or satellite context. I figured I could do wide reference shots for context so I could identify things later, then individual shots of peaks. This will depend on weather, schedule, and my wife's patience. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 11:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
576842 +++$+++ Acroterion +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576840 +++$+++ 2010-08-31 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.283316720E09 +++$+++ Obviously, I'll shoot peaks, lakes, bears (from an appropriately respectful distance), old log buildings, odd roadside structures, weather (preferably not fog or low clouds), vast scenic panoramas, mud pots, fumaroles, places that steam in the middle of the parking lot, bridges, mines, rock formations, as so on. My only problem is keeping track of what I want to shoot and knowing what I've shot once I'm back home. '''<font face=\"Arial\"> +++$+++ ::Obviously, I'll shoot peaks, lakes, bears (from an appropriately respectful distance), old log buildings, odd roadside structures, weather (preferably not fog or low clouds), vast scenic panoramas, mud pots, fumaroles, places that steam in the middle of the parking lot, bridges, mines, rock formations, as so on. My only problem is keeping track of what I want to shoot and knowing what I've shot once I'm back home. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 21:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
576843 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576842 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.283337720E09 +++$+++ That sounds wonderful. Bitteroot Valley is my old region from when I was a kid. I suppose anything along Going to the Sun Road in Glacier NP would be helpful though we have lots of pics of Lake McDonald and St. Mary Lake, not enough of surrounding peaks...also, many historic structures articles use oldish images courtesy of the feds which work fine, but newer ones would be nice too. I can ID most of the mountains from sight and\/or using Google Earth to clarify if you get confused. In other regions like the Mission Range and ranges south of Missoula we don't have a lot of images I don't think, least none well linked via Commons it seems. If in the region near Chouteau, you'll be far east of the Rocky Mountain Front but it's hard to access that region around the Bob Marshall Wilderness anyway...it is really remote. We lack defined images of many of the easily seen peaks of the Tetons, especially the northern part of the range north of Mount Moran and also between Moran and Grand Teton itself and points south. I think Yellowstone, least from easily accessed spots if fairly well covered, but I imagine that more images would still be beneficial. I will look through Commons, see what we have and add more to this...if what we might need is on your direct itenerary, then that would be great!-- +++$+++ :::That sounds wonderful. Bitteroot Valley is my old region from when I was a kid. I suppose anything along Going to the Sun Road in Glacier NP would be helpful though we have lots of pics of Lake McDonald and St. Mary Lake, not enough of surrounding peaks...also, many historic structures articles use oldish images courtesy of the feds which work fine, but newer ones would be nice too. I can ID most of the mountains from sight and/or using Google Earth to clarify if you get confused. In other regions like the Mission Range and ranges south of Missoula we don't have a lot of images I don't think, least none well linked via Commons it seems. If in the region near Chouteau, you'll be far east of the Rocky Mountain Front but it's hard to access that region around the Bob Marshall Wilderness anyway...it is really remote. We lack defined images of many of the easily seen peaks of the Tetons, especially the northern part of the range north of Mount Moran and also between Moran and Grand Teton itself and points south. I think Yellowstone, least from easily accessed spots if fairly well covered, but I imagine that more images would still be beneficial. I will look through Commons, see what we have and add more to this...if what we might need is on your direct itenerary, then that would be great!--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 03:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
576844 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576842 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.283338260E09 +++$+++ I wanted to add that Google is slow to add geo-coordinated articles to their overlay...Commons images show up immediately almost, but the articles themselves have a long lag time...many months. I even had an inquiry recently about the W icon for a covered bridge being off by a half mile, so I adjusted it two weeks ago and it still hasn't been adjusted yet on Google Earth. Few of the numerous mountain stubs I have created for articles on mountains in Glacier NP are showing up yet on Google Earth...even ones I stubbed out back in April...so I don't know if these newer articles will be available via Google Maps yet either.-- +++$+++ :::I wanted to add that Google is slow to add geo-coordinated articles to their overlay...Commons images show up immediately almost, but the articles themselves have a long lag time...many months. I even had an inquiry recently about the W icon for a covered bridge being off by a half mile, so I adjusted it two weeks ago and it still hasn't been adjusted yet on Google Earth. Few of the numerous mountain stubs I have created for articles on mountains in Glacier NP are showing up yet on Google Earth...even ones I stubbed out back in April...so I don't know if these newer articles will be available via Google Maps yet either.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 03:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
576845 +++$+++ Acroterion +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576844 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.283376960E09 +++$+++ It was supposed to snow above 6500' last night all the way down to Missoula! Maybe there'll be some (not too much) photogenic snow when we're there. '''<font face=\"Arial\"> +++$+++ ::::It was supposed to snow above 6500' last night all the way down to Missoula! Maybe there'll be some (not too much) photogenic snow when we're there. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 14:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
576846 +++$+++ Aude +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576845 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.283383260E09 +++$+++ Work is being done on the Toolserver [https:\/\/wiki.toolserver.org\/view\/OpenStreetMap] to provide better integration between OSM, Wikipedia, making Wikipedia coordinates available, and allowing OSM data to be used for maps on Wikipedia. -- +++$+++ :::::Work is being done on the Toolserver [https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/OpenStreetMap] to provide better integration between OSM, Wikipedia, making Wikipedia coordinates available, and allowing OSM data to be used for maps on Wikipedia. --[[User:Aude|Aude]] <small>([[User talk:Aude|talk]])</small> 16:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
576847 +++$+++ Acroterion +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576846 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.283386620E09 +++$+++ Another free-content project\/time sump?! With maps - a personal weakness of mine.  Oh hell, I've signed up. '''<font face=\"Arial\"> +++$+++ ::::::Another free-content project/time sump?! With maps - a personal weakness of mine.  Oh hell, I've signed up. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 17:17, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
576848 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576847 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 23:58:00 +++$+++ 1.283410680E09 +++$+++ Acroterion, I'm looking over images and that will take a lot of time...I could spend weeks at Commons just categorizing images and creating pages that have related images so they are easier to locate...we have a lot of orphans I see in need of categorizing. In addition, geotagging is sorely needed and that may be an immediate project I might commence this evening even...Some of the images are quite good...In Glacier...we do lack images of the northwest region...that road is unpaved but well graded the border region...FYI..I saw it snow a foot in Kalispell in late August (1993) but it was mostly gone the next day...we have but one image of Kintla Lake..[http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&redirs=1&search=Kintla+Lake&fulltext=Search&ns0=1&ns6=1&ns12=1&ns14=1&ns100=1 and two of NRHP] things you uploaded]....[http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=Bitterroot+Range+Montana two of the Bitterroot Range]...etc...I looked over some of the sawtooth Range images and saw some decent shots...[http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Craters_of_the_Moon_National_Monument Craters of the Moon NM] is either poorly represented or just poorly linked...looking over my stubs just of mountains of Glacier NP, less than 10% have images on Commons or generally free use images available via Flicker I could use. Don't feel that just images of buildings and mountains are needed either...we lack good resolution imagery of much of the native flora to the region you are going to...not trees so much, but flowering plants etc. Have I made it too much of a project yet? Hah...-- +++$+++ :::::::Acroterion, I'm looking over images and that will take a lot of time...I could spend weeks at Commons just categorizing images and creating pages that have related images so they are easier to locate...we have a lot of orphans I see in need of categorizing. In addition, geotagging is sorely needed and that may be an immediate project I might commence this evening even...Some of the images are quite good...In Glacier...we do lack images of the northwest region...that road is unpaved but well graded the border region...FYI..I saw it snow a foot in Kalispell in late August (1993) but it was mostly gone the next day...we have but one image of Kintla Lake..[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&redirs=1&search=Kintla+Lake&fulltext=Search&ns0=1&ns6=1&ns12=1&ns14=1&ns100=1 and two of NRHP] things you uploaded]....[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=Bitterroot+Range+Montana two of the Bitterroot Range]...etc...I looked over some of the sawtooth Range images and saw some decent shots...[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Craters_of_the_Moon_National_Monument Craters of the Moon NM] is either poorly represented or just poorly linked...looking over my stubs just of mountains of Glacier NP, less than 10% have images on Commons or generally free use images available via Flicker I could use. Don't feel that just images of buildings and mountains are needed either...we lack good resolution imagery of much of the native flora to the region you are going to...not trees so much, but flowering plants etc. Have I made it too much of a project yet? Hah...--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 23:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
576849 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576847 +++$+++ 2010-09-02 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.283410980E09 +++$+++ Oops...[http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Triple_divide_peak.jpg This image] is tagged as being [[Triple Divide Peak (Montana)|Triple Divide Peak]] but I think it is actually [[Mount Jackson (Montana)|Mount Jackson]]...like I said...lots of work to do at Commons...-- +++$+++ :::::::Oops...[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Triple_divide_peak.jpg This image] is tagged as being [[Triple Divide Peak (Montana)|Triple Divide Peak]] but I think it is actually [[Mount Jackson (Montana)|Mount Jackson]]...like I said...lots of work to do at Commons...--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 00:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
576850 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576847 +++$+++ 2010-09-02 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.283412780E09 +++$+++ I was also wondering if you plan on going over the Beartooth Highway...if so we have few images from that region I think...-- +++$+++ :::::::I was also wondering if you plan on going over the Beartooth Highway...if so we have few images from that region I think...--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 00:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
576851 +++$+++ Acroterion +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576850 +++$+++ 2010-09-02 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.283417760E09 +++$+++ Flora will be scarce this time of year, but I'll see what appears. While I or my wife can identify flowering stuff, herbaceous plants, not so well, so that will be a low priority. I figured I'd seek out some of the more accessible places for which I uploaded images of buildings. I can probably do better than HABS or the NPS guy who got detailed to go take pictures of everything (although in fairness, I worked for the NPS in graduate school and was detailed to document abandoned buildings in Martin Luther King NHS, so I was once that guy). I doubt we'll go over the Beartooth this time, but might do the Chief Joseph Highway toward Cody. I do have some film shots of the Beartooth from 1999, but they need a lot of work - I shot negatives when I should have stuck to Kodachrome, and they're grainy. The weather wasn't good and there was a lot of smoke in the area. '''<font face=\"Arial\"> +++$+++ ::::::::Flora will be scarce this time of year, but I'll see what appears. While I or my wife can identify flowering stuff, herbaceous plants, not so well, so that will be a low priority. I figured I'd seek out some of the more accessible places for which I uploaded images of buildings. I can probably do better than HABS or the NPS guy who got detailed to go take pictures of everything (although in fairness, I worked for the NPS in graduate school and was detailed to document abandoned buildings in Martin Luther King NHS, so I was once that guy). I doubt we'll go over the Beartooth this time, but might do the Chief Joseph Highway toward Cody. I do have some film shots of the Beartooth from 1999, but they need a lot of work - I shot negatives when I should have stuck to Kodachrome, and they're grainy. The weather wasn't good and there was a lot of smoke in the area. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 01:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
576852 +++$+++ Wsiegmund +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576851 +++$+++ 2010-09-02 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.283480460E09 +++$+++ Some asters and gentians may still be blooming. Also, you may see some seed heads and fruit. Pictures of the leaves and involucral bracts help identify the species; flowers and fruit are often not adequate. For documenting the location of an image, before I had my GPS, I took pictures of road and trail signs, mileposts, altimeter, odometer and pedometer readings, etc. Also, I was careful to set the time of my camera so that it was accurate and could be correlated with any notes that I took. Best wishes,  +++$+++ :::::::::Some asters and gentians may still be blooming. Also, you may see some seed heads and fruit. Pictures of the leaves and involucral bracts help identify the species; flowers and fruit are often not adequate. For documenting the location of an image, before I had my GPS, I took pictures of road and trail signs, mileposts, altimeter, odometer and pedometer readings, etc. Also, I was careful to set the time of my camera so that it was accurate and could be correlated with any notes that I took. Best wishes, [[User:Wsiegmund|Walter Siegmund]] [[User_talk:Wsiegmund|(talk)]] 19:21, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
576853 +++$+++ H-stt +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576850 +++$+++ 2010-09-05 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.283694120E09 +++$+++ Regarding Craters of the Moon: If you take a look at the [[Commons:Category:Craters of the Moon National Monument]] instead of the gallery, you wil find that I uploaded everything I liked from the NPS website. It's another of \"my\" parks on deWP and regarded as lesenswert (~good) there: [[de:Craters of the Moon National Monument]]. -- +++$+++ ::::::::Regarding Craters of the Moon: If you take a look at the [[Commons:Category:Craters of the Moon National Monument]] instead of the gallery, you wil find that I uploaded everything I liked from the NPS website. It's another of "my" parks on deWP and regarded as lesenswert (~good) there: [[de:Craters of the Moon National Monument]]. --[[user:H-stt|h-stt]] [[User_talk:H-stt|<small>!?</small>]] 06:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
576854 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576839 +++$+++ 576853 +++$+++ 2010-09-06 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.283760300E09 +++$+++ Oh...I forgot to check the cats...maybe we can transfer those images to the Craters of the Moon page at Commons...-- +++$+++ :::::::::Oh...I forgot to check the cats...maybe we can transfer those images to the Craters of the Moon page at Commons...--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 01:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

21001 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-13 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.305278760E09 +++$+++ Just out of interest, could I ask which case you were referring to just now at WT:V? --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ Just out of interest, could I ask which case you were referring to just now at WT:V? --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|JN]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 02:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
21002 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21001 +++$+++ 21001 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.305279480E09 +++$+++ The discussion is friendly and low key and I would like to keep it that way.  I will email you that answer on the condition that it be only for illustrative purposes of my point and for the courtesy of answering your question. I don't want to \"win\" anything from extra intervention, I would rather move forward into a good working relationship with the other person, hopefully convincing them to be less seemingly pov driven (via expert wikilawyering) rather than \"win\" this.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :The discussion is friendly and low key and I would like to keep it that way.  I will email you that answer on the condition that it be only for illustrative purposes of my point and for the courtesy of answering your question. I don't want to "win" anything from extra intervention, I would rather move forward into a good working relationship with the other person, hopefully convincing them to be less seemingly pov driven (via expert wikilawyering) rather than "win" this.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 02:38, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
21003 +++$+++ Jayen466 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21001 +++$+++ 21002 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 02:52:00 +++$+++ 1.305280320E09 +++$+++ That's cool of you. I will have a look at the discussion if you send me the link, but I won't intervene. --'''<font color=\"#0000FF\"> +++$+++ ::That's cool of you. I will have a look at the discussion if you send me the link, but I won't intervene. --'''<font color="#0000FF">[[User:Jayen466|JN]]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">[[User_Talk:Jayen466|466]]</font>''' 02:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

21004 +++$+++ DFoerster +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21004 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-27 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.306546140E09 +++$+++ Hi! As you are actually doing a lot of work on the 'Titanic' article, I wondered if you are interested in additional sources. I've two comprehensive papers as PDF (Unfortunately, only scanned, hence no text search possible) which are (although not fully flawless) highly valuable. If you are interested, just send me an email containing your email address (on my user's page --> Toolbox --> E-mail this user). Regards, -- +++$+++ Hi! As you are actually doing a lot of work on the 'Titanic' article, I wondered if you are interested in additional sources. I've two comprehensive papers as PDF (Unfortunately, only scanned, hence no text search possible) which are (although not fully flawless) highly valuable. If you are interested, just send me an email containing your email address (on my user's page --> Toolbox --> E-mail this user). Regards, --[[User:DFoerster|DFoerster]] ([[User talk:DFoerster|talk]]) 18:29, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
21005 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21004 +++$+++ 21004 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.306550520E09 +++$+++ PS:  After the next few hours, I'll be off the grid (no internet access) for a week.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :PS:  After the next few hours, I'll be off the grid (no internet access) for a week.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 19:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
21006 +++$+++ Wpwatchdog +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21004 +++$+++ 21005 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.307213760E09 +++$+++ Welcome back!  I think the Encyclopedia Titanica rates as a quality source as long as the citation does not refer to the message board?  Do you agree?  Or should we address this question on the article's talk page?-- +++$+++ ::Welcome back!  I think the Encyclopedia Titanica rates as a quality source as long as the citation does not refer to the message board?  Do you agree?  Or should we address this question on the article's talk page?--[[User:Wpwatchdog|Wpwatchdog]] ([[User talk:Wpwatchdog|talk]]) 11:56, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
21007 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21004 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-05 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.307334660E09 +++$+++ I looked at that web site.   Looks like an immense amount of good information. So then on to the next two questions.  #1 Is it a reliable source of information, and  #2  Does it  meet wp:\"rs\" criteria.  On #1, I think that it is as good as anything.  That means (consciously or subconsciously) checking what we get from there against plausibility, its \"trappings\",  and what was learned from other sources) when using it.   On #2, I'm not sure, but I think that the answer is yes. Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::::I looked at that web site.   Looks like an immense amount of good information. So then on to the next two questions.  #1 Is it a reliable source of information, and  #2  Does it  meet wp:"rs" criteria.  On #1, I think that it is as good as anything.  That means (consciously or subconsciously) checking what we get from there against plausibility, its "trappings",  and what was learned from other sources) when using it.   On #2, I'm not sure, but I think that the answer is yes. Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 21:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
21008 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21004 +++$+++ 21006 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.307219760E09 +++$+++ Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 13:36, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
21009 +++$+++ Wpwatchdog +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21004 +++$+++ 21008 +++$+++ 2011-06-06 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.307428500E09 +++$+++ Good news - Imzadi1979 agreed to help clean up the ''Titanic'' citations.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Imzadi1979#RMS_Titanic_citations].-- +++$+++ ::::Good news - Imzadi1979 agreed to help clean up the ''Titanic'' citations.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Imzadi1979#RMS_Titanic_citations].--[[User:Wpwatchdog|Wpwatchdog]] ([[User talk:Wpwatchdog|talk]]) 23:35, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
21010 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21004 +++$+++ 21009 +++$+++ 2011-06-07 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.307431980E09 +++$+++ Cool.  I left a note at Imzadi's talk page.   Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::::: Cool.  I left a note at Imzadi's talk page.   Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 00:33, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

545293 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-28 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.214692620E09 +++$+++ Could I request your expertise as a biochemist on [[Water ionizer]]?  Mostly on [[Talk:Water_ionizer#Disappointed|this discussion]] and [http:\/\/www.chem1.com\/CQ\/ionbunk.html this] external link.  Thanks!  If you've no time then I understand and don't worry about it.   +++$+++ Could I request your expertise as a biochemist on [[Water ionizer]]?  Mostly on [[Talk:Water_ionizer#Disappointed|this discussion]] and [http://www.chem1.com/CQ/ionbunk.html this] external link.  Thanks!  If you've no time then I understand and don't worry about it.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] ([[User talk:WLU|talk]]) 15:37, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
545294 +++$+++ WLU +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545293 +++$+++ 545293 +++$+++ 2008-06-29 02:27:00 +++$+++ 1.214731620E09 +++$+++ Thanks Tim, my belief as well and I've appended a comment to that effect.  As ever I am most grateful and appreciate your expertise in this regard.   +++$+++ :Thanks Tim, my belief as well and I've appended a comment to that effect.  As ever I am most grateful and appreciate your expertise in this regard.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] ([[User talk:WLU|talk]]) 02:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

283150 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-08 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.155094260E09 +++$+++ There is an Oasis related query over at [[The Beatles trivia]]...  +++$+++ There is an Oasis related query over at [[The Beatles trivia]]... [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 20:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
283151 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283150 +++$+++ 283150 +++$+++ 2006-08-28 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.156804860E09 +++$+++ Click click.-- +++$+++ :Click click.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 15:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

545295 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-28 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.214706240E09 +++$+++ I just don't see the mutualism the way this is now worded.  How does the archaeal consumption of hydrogen benefit the protozoa?  The sources I've consulted indicate that the microbes (unidentified) on the surface of the protozoa supply some necessary enzymes.  I'm also awar that although spontaneous combustion in humans is apocryphal, it is a real phenomenon in termites because of the buildup of explosive gases.  The removal of one of those gases by archaea would therefore be a benefit.  I'll look for more, but the current wording leaves the mutualism as rather dubious. -- +++$+++ I just don't see the mutualism the way this is now worded.  How does the archaeal consumption of hydrogen benefit the protozoa?  The sources I've consulted indicate that the microbes (unidentified) on the surface of the protozoa supply some necessary enzymes.  I'm also awar that although spontaneous combustion in humans is apocryphal, it is a real phenomenon in termites because of the buildup of explosive gases.  The removal of one of those gases by archaea would therefore be a benefit.  I'll look for more, but the current wording leaves the mutualism as rather dubious. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 19:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
545296 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545295 +++$+++ 545295 +++$+++ 2008-06-28 19:31:00 +++$+++ 1.214706660E09 +++$+++ Do you mean that, in essence, removal of hydrogen gas from the gut enivronment improves the diffusion gradient for the release of more hydrogen gas? -- +++$+++ :Do you mean that, in essence, removal of hydrogen gas from the gut enivronment improves the diffusion gradient for the release of more hydrogen gas? --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 19:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
545297 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545295 +++$+++ 545295 +++$+++ 2008-06-28 19:39:00 +++$+++ 1.214707140E09 +++$+++ OK, I think I see now; it's a matter of electron transport.  I'll take a stab at explaining this in simple language.  The Stolyar et al. reference would be a good one to include if it's possible to do so, since it establishes the necessary use of hydrogen over format in at least one microbial exchange system. -- +++$+++ :OK, I think I see now; it's a matter of electron transport.  I'll take a stab at explaining this in simple language.  The Stolyar et al. reference would be a good one to include if it's possible to do so, since it establishes the necessary use of hydrogen over format in at least one microbial exchange system. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 19:39, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
545298 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545295 +++$+++ 545297 +++$+++ 2008-06-28 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.214708400E09 +++$+++ The prose was becoming difficult to parse.  I was independnetly working on an explanation and have incorporated some of the result into the article. -- +++$+++ ::The prose was becoming difficult to parse.  I was independnetly working on an explanation and have incorporated some of the result into the article. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 20:00, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

283153 +++$+++ Ta bu shi da yu +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283153 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-12 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.155451680E09 +++$+++ I'm pretty impressed with your article on Noel Gallagher! However, it needs a copyedit to make it flow better. One thing I noticed was the overuse of the word \"also\". You are very close to having a FA-worthy article though. Keep up the good work! -  +++$+++ I'm pretty impressed with your article on Noel Gallagher! However, it needs a copyedit to make it flow better. One thing I noticed was the overuse of the word "also". You are very close to having a FA-worthy article though. Keep up the good work! - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 23:48, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
283154 +++$+++ Hullaballoo Wolfowitz +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283153 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-15 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.155688080E09 +++$+++ \"Under the \"Remove unsourced or poorly sourced negative material\" paragraph of [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]], statements like these are to be removed immediately if they are not properly sourced. Claims of plagiarism and illegal drug abuse are clearly \"negative material.\" If they are well-documented, just find reliable sources and add the material back, citing those sources. Make sure that what the article says on these matters matches what the source says. No disagreement about content, just about sourcing -- statements like these now must be verified, not just verifiable.  +++$+++ :::"Under the "Remove unsourced or poorly sourced negative material" paragraph of [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]], statements like these are to be removed immediately if they are not properly sourced. Claims of plagiarism and illegal drug abuse are clearly "negative material." If they are well-documented, just find reliable sources and add the material back, citing those sources. Make sure that what the article says on these matters matches what the source says. No disagreement about content, just about sourcing -- statements like these now must be verified, not just verifiable. [[User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|The editor formerly known as Harmonica Wolfowitz]] 17:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

21011 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.307918220E09 +++$+++ There is a proposal to change the first sentence of wp:ver at [[Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability#Proposal for a change in the first sentence]].  Your input is requested.  Sincerely,<font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ There is a proposal to change the first sentence of wp:ver at [[Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability#Proposal for a change in the first sentence]].  Your input is requested.  Sincerely,<font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 15:37, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
21012 +++$+++ Tryptofish +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21011 +++$+++ 21011 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.308025560E09 +++$+++ I'm going to reply to your comment there, but first, I just want to say thank you for the very kind words you said about me. -- +++$+++ :I'm going to reply to your comment there, but first, I just want to say thank you for the very kind words you said about me. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 21:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
21013 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21011 +++$+++ 21012 +++$+++ 2011-06-13 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.308026040E09 +++$+++ They were well deserved.  You made a proposal which I would call a masterstroke.  And you being on the opposite side of me in the the debate would not slow me down for a second in saying this. The big picture is that it's all good people there with the best in mind for Wikipedia; just different perspectives on what will work best.  Thanks for the note. Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::They were well deserved.  You made a proposal which I would call a masterstroke.  And you being on the opposite side of me in the the debate would not slow me down for a second in saying this. The big picture is that it's all good people there with the best in mind for Wikipedia; just different perspectives on what will work best.  Thanks for the note. Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 21:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

21014 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21014 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-14 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.308046800E09 +++$+++ Please review my proposed changes in the GA2 page.  Please also consider whether they pose a copyright problem. If they are suitable, either you or I can add them to article space. Thanks!  +++$+++ Please review my proposed changes in the GA2 page.  Please also consider whether they pose a copyright problem. If they are suitable, either you or I can add them to article space. Thanks! [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 03:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
21015 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21014 +++$+++ 21014 +++$+++ 2011-06-14 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.308079440E09 +++$+++ I have added them to the article.  Can you take another look? Would it be possible to complete the GA review? Thanks,  +++$+++ :I have added them to the article.  Can you take another look? Would it be possible to complete the GA review? Thanks, [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 12:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
21016 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21014 +++$+++ 21015 +++$+++ 2011-06-14 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.308080040E09 +++$+++ Right now I think on lots of them there are no notes on the review page regarding which items were implemented. So my only way to know which are done would be to keep re-reading the article, which takes longer. It would help speed it along (if yo wish) if you could note on the review page which items are completed. Also remember that these are just suggestions, if you think any are unnecessary or not a good idea, just let me know.   Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::Right now I think on lots of them there are no notes on the review page regarding which items were implemented. So my only way to know which are done would be to keep re-reading the article, which takes longer. It would help speed it along (if yo wish) if you could note on the review page which items are completed. Also remember that these are just suggestions, if you think any are unnecessary or not a good idea, just let me know.   Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 12:34, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
21017 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21014 +++$+++ 21016 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.308134640E09 +++$+++ I will do. Thanks,  +++$+++ :::I will do. Thanks, [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 03:44, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
21018 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21014 +++$+++ 21017 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.308142980E09 +++$+++ Everything is done including adding the table with a heading. Please wrap up by 14:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC). Thanks,  +++$+++ ::::Everything is done including adding the table with a heading. Please wrap up by 14:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC). Thanks, [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 06:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
21019 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21014 +++$+++ 21018 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.308163140E09 +++$+++ Cool. I understand the unusual time note.  This has to be done right irrespective of anything, but fortunately I've have already been going through it again, have no additional items, and passed it. Nice article, interesting article.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::::Cool. I understand the unusual time note.  This has to be done right irrespective of anything, but fortunately I've have already been going through it again, have no additional items, and passed it. Nice article, interesting article.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 11:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
21020 +++$+++ Racepacket +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21014 +++$+++ 21019 +++$+++ 2011-06-15 11:57:00 +++$+++ 1.308164220E09 +++$+++ I fixed your template and GA listing so it is fine now. Thank you for your thorough review.  +++$+++ ::::::I fixed your template and GA listing so it is fine now. Thank you for your thorough review. [[User:Racepacket|Racepacket]] ([[User talk:Racepacket|talk]]) 11:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

283161 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-22 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.156314120E09 +++$+++ Cheers Joe.  +++$+++ Cheers Joe. [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 23:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
283162 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283161 +++$+++ 283161 +++$+++ 2006-08-29 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.156904100E09 +++$+++ Congratulations on the exams! Wonderful news. (Can I borrow a fiver, BTW?) :)  +++$+++ :Congratulations on the exams! Wonderful news. (Can I borrow a fiver, BTW?) :) [[User:Andreasegde|The very dead, deceased, and not breathing at all Spike Milligan]] 19:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

545308 +++$+++ Jwinius +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545308 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-30 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.214858280E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, Good to see you're still active. I've been working on ''[[Agkistrodon piscivorus]]'' and thought I was doing a pretty good job, but then I saw [[Oxidative phosphorylation]]... wow! Anyway, I seem to have gotten it into my mind that I can do the same thing to the ''[[Boidae]]'' series as I did to ''[[Pythonidae]]''. I've suggested that 14 of those articles be moved to their scientific names, but expect there will be some resistance, so I was wondering if I could count on your support. :-)  Cheers, -- +++$+++ Hi Tim, Good to see you're still active. I've been working on ''[[Agkistrodon piscivorus]]'' and thought I was doing a pretty good job, but then I saw [[Oxidative phosphorylation]]... wow! Anyway, I seem to have gotten it into my mind that I can do the same thing to the ''[[Boidae]]'' series as I did to ''[[Pythonidae]]''. I've suggested that 14 of those articles be moved to their scientific names, but expect there will be some resistance, so I was wondering if I could count on your support. :-)  Cheers, --[[User:Jwinius|Jwinius]] ([[User talk:Jwinius|talk]]) 13:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
545309 +++$+++ Jwinius +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545308 +++$+++ 545308 +++$+++ 2008-07-02 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.215020760E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Tim! -- +++$+++ :Thanks, Tim! --[[User:Jwinius|Jwinius]] ([[User talk:Jwinius|talk]]) 10:46, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

21021 +++$+++ BootleggerWill +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-14 04:05:00 +++$+++ 1.308049500E09 +++$+++ Hey, North. Since you seem to be the only person even aware [[WP:ROOTS|Wikiproject Roots Music]] right now, I thought I'd come to you. I'm working on getting an article on [[Mississippi John Hurt]]'s 1966 album ''[[User:BootleggerWill\/Draft of Article|Today!]]'' up to a good standard, and I'd like your feedback. See if there's anything pressing I need to chance before I put it up. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hey, North. Since you seem to be the only person even aware [[WP:ROOTS|Wikiproject Roots Music]] right now, I thought I'd come to you. I'm working on getting an article on [[Mississippi John Hurt]]'s 1966 album ''[[User:BootleggerWill/Draft of Article|Today!]]'' up to a good standard, and I'd like your feedback. See if there's anything pressing I need to chance before I put it up. Thanks. [[User:BootleggerWill|BootleggerWill]] ([[User talk:BootleggerWill|talk]]) 04:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
21022 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21021 +++$+++ 21021 +++$+++ 2011-06-14 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.308070260E09 +++$+++ Nice that you are developing that and to see signs of life. Nice article!  My one suggestion would address some confusion I had when I read it, probably due to my brain running at half speed before my morning coffee.  The \"history\" section is more about the artist than the album, and I was subconsciously thinking it was an article about him. Then when I got to the track listing I though \"which album is this for?\"  You might want to add a few words to the section headings or possibly sub-sections to the history section to clarify this. Let me know if I can be of help.   Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Nice that you are developing that and to see signs of life. Nice article!  My one suggestion would address some confusion I had when I read it, probably due to my brain running at half speed before my morning coffee.  The "history" section is more about the artist than the album, and I was subconsciously thinking it was an article about him. Then when I got to the track listing I though "which album is this for?"  You might want to add a few words to the section headings or possibly sub-sections to the history section to clarify this. Let me know if I can be of help.   Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 09:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

545310 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-01 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.214967840E09 +++$+++ I may be off Wikipedia for a day or two.  I have (since before the [[Archaea]] FAC started) obligations for a couple of projects on Wiktionary.  This hasn't been a problem until now, but I've had to schedule doctor appointments for today and tomorrow that are taking a huge chunk of my time away.  Jest letting you know I may not make many edits or comments for a couple of days. -- +++$+++ I may be off Wikipedia for a day or two.  I have (since before the [[Archaea]] FAC started) obligations for a couple of projects on Wiktionary.  This hasn't been a problem until now, but I've had to schedule doctor appointments for today and tomorrow that are taking a huge chunk of my time away.  Jest letting you know I may not make many edits or comments for a couple of days. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 20:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
545311 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545310 +++$+++ 545310 +++$+++ 2008-07-02 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.214983320E09 +++$+++ Regarding images of Archaea.  It might be possible to write to Dr. Karl O. Stetter at the University of Regensberg, Germany, or to Mike Dyall-Smith at the University of Melbourne.  Dr. Stetter provided many images for Howland's book, and Dr. Dyall-Smith has taken some incredible images of ''Haloarcula quadrata''.   I wrote to Dr. Stetter about ten years ago, and got permission to use some of his lovely images for a website.  He was very friendly and glad to provide the images.  Of course, Wiki policy pretty much requires GFDL now, but one of these individuals might be willing to upload a low-resolution image or two to Commons themselves.  I think many profession scientists underestimate the value of a place like Commons, where digital images can be uploaded for general use by colleagues. -- +++$+++ :Regarding images of Archaea.  It might be possible to write to Dr. Karl O. Stetter at the University of Regensberg, Germany, or to Mike Dyall-Smith at the University of Melbourne.  Dr. Stetter provided many images for Howland's book, and Dr. Dyall-Smith has taken some incredible images of ''Haloarcula quadrata''.   I wrote to Dr. Stetter about ten years ago, and got permission to use some of his lovely images for a website.  He was very friendly and glad to provide the images.  Of course, Wiki policy pretty much requires GFDL now, but one of these individuals might be willing to upload a low-resolution image or two to Commons themselves.  I think many profession scientists underestimate the value of a place like Commons, where digital images can be uploaded for general use by colleagues. --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 00:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
545312 +++$+++ EncycloPetey +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545310 +++$+++ 545311 +++$+++ 2008-07-02 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.215038580E09 +++$+++ Gee, I guess I didn't need to worry too much about not having lots of wiki-time... Thanks for suggesting that the article go straight to FAC instead of GAN, and thanks for dedicated work improving the article! -- +++$+++ ::Gee, I guess I didn't need to worry too much about not having lots of wiki-time... Thanks for suggesting that the article go straight to FAC instead of GAN, and thanks for dedicated work improving the article! --[[User:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] ([[User talk:EncycloPetey|talk]]) 15:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

21023 +++$+++ TreasuryTag +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-18 15:55:00 +++$+++ 1.308437700E09 +++$+++ Please could you stop the \"multiple personality\" thing [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&diff=prev&oldid=434945494] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&diff=prev&oldid=434945713] because it is [[WP:DE|disruptive]] and [[WP:GHBH|disallowed by Wikipedia policy]] as far as I can tell. Thanks, <font color=\"#C4112F\">\u255f\u2500 +++$+++ Please could you stop the "multiple personality" thing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&diff=prev&oldid=434945494] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&diff=prev&oldid=434945713] because it is [[WP:DE|disruptive]] and [[WP:GHBH|disallowed by Wikipedia policy]] as far as I can tell. Thanks, <font color="#C4112F">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">Not-content</span>]]─╢</font> 15:55, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
21024 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21023 +++$+++ 21023 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.308438000E09 +++$+++ If it is disallowed, please tell me where and I'll stop.  Otherwise, I think it is (occasionally) very useful, and do not agree that it is disruptive. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :If it is disallowed, please tell me where and I'll stop.  Otherwise, I think it is (occasionally) very useful, and do not agree that it is disruptive. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 16:00, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
21025 +++$+++ TreasuryTag +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21023 +++$+++ 21024 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 16:01:00 +++$+++ 1.308438060E09 +++$+++ As you can see, I linked to [[WP:GHBH]] in my original comment. <font color=\"#00ACF4\">\u255f\u2500 +++$+++ ::As you can see, I linked to [[WP:GHBH]] in my original comment. <font color="#00ACF4">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">condominium</span>]]─╢</font> 16:01, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
21026 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21023 +++$+++ 21025 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.308438180E09 +++$+++ That one is clearly not applicable. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::That one is clearly not applicable. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 16:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
21027 +++$+++ Nuujinn +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21023 +++$+++ 21026 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.308438300E09 +++$+++ I will second TreasuryTag's request, this kind of activity is not helpful. <span style=\"text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD\">-- +++$+++ ::::I will second TreasuryTag's request, this kind of activity is not helpful. <span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">--[[User:Nuujinn|Nuujinn]] ([[User_talk:Nuujinn|talk]])</span> 16:05, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
21028 +++$+++ Singularity42 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21023 +++$+++ 21026 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.308438360E09 +++$+++ You made a comment [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&diff=434945494&oldid=434943653 here], and then two minutes later you logged in under your other account and expressed agreement with that comment [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&diff=next&oldid=434945494 here]. [[WP:ILLEGIT]] specifically lists \"''Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts''\" as an illegitmate use of multiple accounts.  +++$+++ ::::You made a comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&diff=434945494&oldid=434943653 here], and then two minutes later you logged in under your other account and expressed agreement with that comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&diff=next&oldid=434945494 here]. [[WP:ILLEGIT]] specifically lists "''Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts''" as an illegitmate use of multiple accounts. [[User:Singularity42|Singularity42]] ([[User talk:Singularity42|talk]]) 16:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
21029 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21023 +++$+++ 21028 +++$+++ 2011-06-18 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.308438840E09 +++$+++ Actually TheParasite was disagreeing with me, liking the status quo which I was disparaging. I will clarify. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::::Actually TheParasite was disagreeing with me, liking the status quo which I was disparaging. I will clarify. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 16:14, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

527792 +++$+++ cocoaguy +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527792 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-08 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.181291460E09 +++$+++ I understand that my nomination request is denied, but what does 'I am envoking my right to private reasoning on this vote (see this). For Committee members, see our private mailing list. Daniel 06:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)' mean, could i be told? -- ( +++$+++ I understand that my nomination request is denied, but what does 'I am envoking my right to private reasoning on this vote (see this). For Committee members, see our private mailing list. Daniel 06:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)' mean, could i be told? -- ([[User:cocoaguy|Cocoaguy ここがいい ]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/cocoaguy|contribs]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[User talk:cocoaguy|talk]]</span></sup>) 01:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
527793 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527792 +++$+++ 527792 +++$+++ 2007-06-08 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.181304300E09 +++$+++ It means that my justification for voting oppose was not recorded on-wiki. I explained by reasoning for voting oppose, '''and''' my reason for keeping the vote private, to my fellow members via our private mailing list. ''' +++$+++ :It means that my justification for voting oppose was not recorded on-wiki. I explained by reasoning for voting oppose, '''and''' my reason for keeping the vote private, to my fellow members via our private mailing list. '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 05:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

545317 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545317 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-03 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.215131460E09 +++$+++ Tim are you able to help move [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Ant]] out of stall mode?  There have been several calls for a copyedit, but no work done in five days.  I need a new set of eyes to help bring it over the hump, or at least say yes or no.   +++$+++ Tim are you able to help move [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ant]] out of stall mode?  There have been several calls for a copyedit, but no work done in five days.  I need a new set of eyes to help bring it over the hump, or at least say yes or no.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
545318 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545317 +++$+++ 545317 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.215148860E09 +++$+++ Very nice, Tim; thank you so much.   +++$+++ : Very nice, Tim; thank you so much.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
545319 +++$+++ Shyamal +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545317 +++$+++ 545318 +++$+++ 2008-07-04 06:10:00 +++$+++ 1.215177000E09 +++$+++ Thanks a ton. That is indeed a much better article now.  +++$+++ ::Thanks a ton. That is indeed a much better article now. [[User:Shyamal|Shyamal]] ([[User talk:Shyamal|talk]]) 06:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

21030 +++$+++ TreasuryTag +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-18 16:09:00 +++$+++ 1.308438540E09 +++$+++ Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.   <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. <font color=\"#FFB911\">\u255f\u2500 +++$+++ Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.   <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. <font color="#FFB911">╟─[[User:TreasuryTag|Treasury]][[User talk:TreasuryTag|Tag]]►[[Special:Contributions/TreasuryTag|<span style="cursor:help;">Odelsting</span>]]─╢</font> 16:09, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
21031 +++$+++ Nuujinn +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21030 +++$+++ 21030 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.308622260E09 +++$+++ North8000, thank you for retiring your doppelg\xe4nger. You might want to update your userpage tho. <span style=\"text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD\">-- +++$+++ :North8000, thank you for retiring your doppelgänger. You might want to update your userpage tho. <span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">--[[User:Nuujinn|Nuujinn]] ([[User_talk:Nuujinn|talk]])</span> 19:11, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
21032 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21030 +++$+++ 21031 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.308622620E09 +++$+++ I'll change the wording to past tense.  But I think I should still keep the disclosure up.  Even with zero violations of policy and every \"i\"  dotted and \"t\" crossed it has gone on too long, and I'd hate to see what would happen if it wasn't.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::I'll change the wording to past tense.  But I think I should still keep the disclosure up.  Even with zero violations of policy and every "i"  dotted and "t" crossed it has gone on too long, and I'd hate to see what would happen if it wasn't.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 19:17, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
21033 +++$+++ Nuujinn +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21030 +++$+++ 21032 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.308622740E09 +++$+++ I think that makes good sense. Thanks for the consideration, it is much appreciated. <span style=\"text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD\">-- +++$+++ :::I think that makes good sense. Thanks for the consideration, it is much appreciated. <span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">--[[User:Nuujinn|Nuujinn]] ([[User_talk:Nuujinn|talk]])</span> 19:19, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
21034 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21030 +++$+++ 21033 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.308623220E09 +++$+++ My pleasure. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::::My pleasure. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 19:27, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

283175 +++$+++ Mollsmolyneux +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283175 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-09 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.157825940E09 +++$+++ There is currently a role call going on for this project and if you wish to contiune to help out with this project please see the project talk page. -- +++$+++ There is currently a role call going on for this project and if you wish to contiune to help out with this project please see the project talk page. --[[User:Mollsmolyneux|Mollsmolyneux]] 11:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
283176 +++$+++ Painbearer +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283175 +++$+++ 283175 +++$+++ 2006-09-12 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.158120960E09 +++$+++ Regards:  +++$+++ :Regards: [[User:Painbearer|Painbearer]] 21:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
283177 +++$+++ Painbearer +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283175 +++$+++ 283175 +++$+++ 2006-09-12 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.158122040E09 +++$+++ Regards:  +++$+++ :Regards: [[User:Painbearer|Painbearer]] 21:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

283178 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283178 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-16 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.158439560E09 +++$+++ Hi, I am working again some on the [[Michael Palin]] article and I saw this fact you added (a long time ago) in the [[Monty Python]] article. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Monty_Python&diff=7794601&oldid=7794287], the second half of that paragraph. It certainly seems to be true, but do you have a source for that so that I can add that to the articles? I couldn't find it on the net or in the python book I have here.  +++$+++ Hi, I am working again some on the [[Michael Palin]] article and I saw this fact you added (a long time ago) in the [[Monty Python]] article. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monty_Python&diff=7794601&oldid=7794287], the second half of that paragraph. It certainly seems to be true, but do you have a source for that so that I can add that to the articles? I couldn't find it on the net or in the python book I have here. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 13:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
283179 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283178 +++$+++ 283178 +++$+++ 2006-09-18 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.158564540E09 +++$+++ Thanks for sourcing that one. Do you still have that book? My library doesn't have it and it would be handy to use for this article.  +++$+++ : Thanks for sourcing that one. Do you still have that book? My library doesn't have it and it would be handy to use for this article. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 00:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
283180 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283178 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-20 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.158797160E09 +++$+++ I still think that if there was a section - which nobody in the whole world has at the moment (about Johnny and his nasty bits) it would balance the whole article out. It doesn\xb4t have to be Albert Goldmann style, but just something that shows his other side. I once read where he said, \"Oh, in Greenwich village, where all those Wanna-bees live, y\xb4know?\", which opened my eyes a bit. That would be more argued about than his \"Jew\" comment. Anyone seen a self-aggrandizing dead crocodile hunter about? Crikey!   -- +++$+++ :::I still think that if there was a section - which nobody in the whole world has at the moment (about Johnny and his nasty bits) it would balance the whole article out. It doesn´t have to be Albert Goldmann style, but just something that shows his other side. I once read where he said, "Oh, in Greenwich village, where all those Wanna-bees live, y´know?", which opened my eyes a bit. That would be more argued about than his "Jew" comment. Anyone seen a self-aggrandizing dead crocodile hunter about? Crikey!   --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 17:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
283181 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283178 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-21 09:05:00 +++$+++ 1.158854700E09 +++$+++ On second thoughts (and being on the wagon) I refute my previous comment as being a load of old bollocks. There you go - I\xb4ve insulted myself. BTW, Pathedog thinks I\xb4m a cheerleader, but the thought of me in a tutu holding two pom-poms would be, quite frankly, an horrific sight to behold. I would probably get arrested. -- +++$+++ ::::On second thoughts (and being on the wagon) I refute my previous comment as being a load of old bollocks. There you go - I´ve insulted myself. BTW, Pathedog thinks I´m a cheerleader, but the thought of me in a tutu holding two pom-poms would be, quite frankly, an horrific sight to behold. I would probably get arrested. --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 09:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
283182 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283178 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-09-23 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.159076040E09 +++$+++ BTW, I have realised what you meant about being an Admin. It\xb4s like correcting homework (which I have done). You were absolutely right. Perusing mistakes, and adding (citation needed) is easy, but somehow being in another dimension. Does that make sense? -- +++$+++ :::::BTW, I have realised what you meant about being an Admin. It´s like correcting homework (which I have done). You were absolutely right. Perusing mistakes, and adding (citation needed) is easy, but somehow being in another dimension. Does that make sense? --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 22:34, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

21035 +++$+++ Novaseminary +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-20 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.308614760E09 +++$+++ Please keep in mind [[WP:SELFCITE]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ Please keep in mind [[WP:SELFCITE]]. Thank you. [[User:Novaseminary|Novaseminary]] ([[User talk:Novaseminary|talk]]) 17:06, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
21036 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21035 +++$+++ 21035 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.308616560E09 +++$+++ Always, should it ever arise.  <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Always, should it ever arise.  <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 17:36, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
21037 +++$+++ Antediluvian67 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21035 +++$+++ 21036 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.309219260E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :: [[User:Antediluvian67|Antediluvian67]] ([[User talk:Antediluvian67|talk]]) 17:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
21038 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21035 +++$+++ 21037 +++$+++ 2011-06-27 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.309221960E09 +++$+++ Cool.  Thanks for the note, and thanks for contributing!   Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::Cool.  Thanks for the note, and thanks for contributing!   Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 17:46, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

545325 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545325 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-06 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.215394800E09 +++$+++ Many thanks, Tim, for your review and tweaks\/additions. I'll start working through the points later this evening.  +++$+++ Many thanks, Tim, for your review and tweaks/additions. I'll start working through the points later this evening. [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 18:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
545326 +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545325 +++$+++ 545325 +++$+++ 2008-07-07 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.215496020E09 +++$+++ I think I've addressed most of your specific points. The more general improvements to the prose will take me a little longer.   +++$+++ :I think I've addressed most of your specific points. The more general improvements to the prose will take me a little longer.  [[User:Colin|Colin]]°[[User talk:Colin|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

21039 +++$+++ Fluffernutter +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21039 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.309308360E09 +++$+++ Please consider redacting your use of \"a social misfit\" in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28policy%29&diff=436703601&oldid=436702068 this comment]. It comes across like a personal attack.  +++$+++ Please consider redacting your use of "a social misfit" in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28policy%29&diff=436703601&oldid=436702068 this comment]. It comes across like a personal attack. [[User:Fluffernutter|A fluffernutter is a sandwich!]] ([[User talk:Fluffernutter|talk]]) 17:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
21040 +++$+++  +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21039 +++$+++ 21039 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ It was speaking about a hypothetical person who might mass nominate those 1,000,000 articles for deletion!  It is not about a person, and there is no person involved! If you feel that that wasn't clear, I would be happy to clarify.  Or, I would also be willing to redact stating it as ''solely'' because you asked me.  Sincerely, 18:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC) +++$+++ :It was speaking about a hypothetical person who might mass nominate those 1,000,000 articles for deletion!  It is not about a person, and there is no person involved! If you feel that that wasn't clear, I would be happy to clarify.  Or, I would also be willing to redact stating it as ''solely'' because you asked me.  Sincerely, 18:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
21041 +++$+++ Fluffernutter +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21039 +++$+++ 21040 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.309311180E09 +++$+++ As I'm sure you know, I have no power to make you do anything. I was merely pointing out that to the reader, it appeared that you were insulting the person who was the impetus of the WP:BEFORE discussion, and that you may want to consider removing it for that reason, since personal attacks and insults are frowned upon. If you don't wish to make the redaction, that is your prerogative, but I would advise that you take care with your wordings to avoid hurting people.  +++$+++ ::As I'm sure you know, I have no power to make you do anything. I was merely pointing out that to the reader, it appeared that you were insulting the person who was the impetus of the WP:BEFORE discussion, and that you may want to consider removing it for that reason, since personal attacks and insults are frowned upon. If you don't wish to make the redaction, that is your prerogative, but I would advise that you take care with your wordings to avoid hurting people. [[User:Fluffernutter|A fluffernutter is a sandwich!]] ([[User talk:Fluffernutter|talk]]) 18:33, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
21042 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21039 +++$+++ 21041 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.309311840E09 +++$+++ I did not realize that it could be taken that way, thanks for pointing that out; I will clarify right away. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::I did not realize that it could be taken that way, thanks for pointing that out; I will clarify right away. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 18:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
21043 +++$+++ Fluffernutter +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21039 +++$+++ 21042 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.309312380E09 +++$+++ Great, thank you!  +++$+++ ::::Great, thank you! [[User:Fluffernutter|A fluffernutter is a sandwich!]] ([[User talk:Fluffernutter|talk]]) 18:53, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
21044 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21039 +++$+++ 21043 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.309312980E09 +++$+++ My pleasure.  I actually took the term completely out.  Simpler\/easier than clarifying. Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::::My pleasure.  I actually took the term completely out.  Simpler/easier than clarifying. Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 19:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

545331 +++$+++ Abhaac +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545331 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-13 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.213388880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Abhaac|<font color="red">J</font><font color="purple">n</font><font color="blue">W</font>]][[User talk:Abhaac|<sup>talk</sup>]] 13:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
545332 +++$+++ Abhaac +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545331 +++$+++ 545331 +++$+++ 2008-06-18 14:44:00 +++$+++ 1.213825440E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Abhaac|<font color="red">J</font><font color="purple">n</font><font color="blue">W</font>]][[User talk:Abhaac|<sup>talk</sup>]] 14:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

21045 +++$+++ GroveGuy +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21045 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-07 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.310030940E09 +++$+++ North8000 - I see on the talk page for Marjory Stoneman Douglas that you say \"River of Grass\" as though it might be the name of a book. Please don't refer to the book \"Everglades\" as \"River of Grass\". See: [http:\/\/grovebook.com\/GA42.htm Douglas Mystery].  +++$+++ North8000 - I see on the talk page for Marjory Stoneman Douglas that you say "River of Grass" as though it might be the name of a book. Please don't refer to the book "Everglades" as "River of Grass". See: [http://grovebook.com/GA42.htm Douglas Mystery]. [[User:GroveGuy|GroveGuy]] ([[User talk:GroveGuy|talk]]) 02:29, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
21046 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21045 +++$+++ 21045 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310031720E09 +++$+++ Huh?   Incidentally, the correct full title is ''The Everglades: River of Grass''; I am looking at the book as I write this.  Sincerely,  <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Huh?   Incidentally, the correct full title is ''The Everglades: River of Grass''; I am looking at the book as I write this.  Sincerely,  <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 02:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

283190 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283190 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-26 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.164597840E09 +++$+++ Haven't seen you around for awhile, but I hope you're doing well. -- +++$+++ Haven't seen you around for awhile, but I hope you're doing well. --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 19:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
283191 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283190 +++$+++ 283190 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.165085940E09 +++$+++ Anyway; I hope you're keeping well, and quaffing those delicious pints of golden nectar now and then. (I won't think about cheese and onion crisps, pork scratchings and fish and chips, 'cos I'll go potty...) -- +++$+++ :Anyway; I hope you're keeping well, and quaffing those delicious pints of golden nectar now and then. (I won't think about cheese and onion crisps, pork scratchings and fish and chips, 'cos I'll go potty...) --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 10:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
283192 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283190 +++$+++ 283191 +++$+++ 2006-12-05 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.165369080E09 +++$+++ Yup, I'm a Brit in the land of big sausages and leather trousers, but I'm going to London in Feb with an English class from the local steel company. London's miles better now than when I lived there. What do you think of the work on Macca, BTW? -- +++$+++ ::Yup, I'm a Brit in the land of big sausages and leather trousers, but I'm going to London in Feb with an English class from the local steel company. London's miles better now than when I lived there. What do you think of the work on Macca, BTW? --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 17:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
283193 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283190 +++$+++ 283192 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.165478520E09 +++$+++ I forgot - Nottingham's 'Goose Fair'. The worst job in the world: The bloke that walks around with a mop and bucket and cleans up the puke (after 11 o'clock at night) around that whirly ride thingy... \"Aye-up, duck\"... :) BTW, Look for an Austrian thing called a \"Bosner\". (Rhymes with 'hose') -- +++$+++ :::I forgot - Nottingham's 'Goose Fair'. The worst job in the world: The bloke that walks around with a mop and bucket and cleans up the puke (after 11 o'clock at night) around that whirly ride thingy... "Aye-up, duck"... :) BTW, Look for an Austrian thing called a "Bosner". (Rhymes with 'hose') --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 00:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
283194 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283190 +++$+++ 283193 +++$+++ 2006-12-07 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.165487700E09 +++$+++ I have decided to come \"out of the closet\". -- +++$+++ ::::I have decided to come "out of the closet". --[[User:Andreasegde|Andrew Edge]] 02:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

21047 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21047 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-13 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.310559120E09 +++$+++ While I understand that you said you don't wish to join, I thought it would be polite to inform you that [[Wikipedia:Wikiproject Abandoned Drafts]] has been created. If you wish to work with us in the future, i'd be glad to hear it. <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ While I understand that you said you don't wish to join, I thought it would be polite to inform you that [[Wikipedia:Wikiproject Abandoned Drafts]] has been created. If you wish to work with us in the future, i'd be glad to hear it. <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 05:12, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
21048 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21047 +++$+++ 21047 +++$+++ 2011-07-13 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.310575980E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  I think that it's a great idea.    Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Thanks!  I think that it's a great idea.    Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 09:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
21049 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21047 +++$+++ 21047 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.310986260E09 +++$+++ VERY happy that you're there, even if we occasionally disagree.  :-)  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :VERY happy that you're there, even if we occasionally disagree.  :-)  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 03:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

21050 +++$+++ VEBott +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-21 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.311267060E09 +++$+++ The best summary I've found of the issue that the article tackles is from Canada: [http:\/\/www.ccdt.ca\/english\/publications\/lit-pdfs\/Brain-Death-Short-Lit-Review.pdf  A review of the literature on the determination of brain death] Have a look, it covers the bases.  +++$+++ The best summary I've found of the issue that the article tackles is from Canada: [http://www.ccdt.ca/english/publications/lit-pdfs/Brain-Death-Short-Lit-Review.pdf  A review of the literature on the determination of brain death] Have a look, it covers the bases. [[User:VEBott|VEBott]] ([[User talk:VEBott|talk]]) 09:51, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
21051 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21050 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 10:06:00 +++$+++ 1.311267960E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  Actually I did mean UK; let me explain.  I'm no expert on the topic, so I'm just talking about what is in the article.  And, based on what is in there, it is not clear whether or not that is the official standard within the UK. When one looks closely, they see that there was no cite\/sourcing in the article for that \/ such a  statement.  And so my statement was more cautions \/minimal, saying that it has gained some ground in the UK. Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::Thanks.  Actually I did mean UK; let me explain.  I'm no expert on the topic, so I'm just talking about what is in the article.  And, based on what is in there, it is not clear whether or not that is the official standard within the UK. When one looks closely, they see that there was no cite/sourcing in the article for that / such a  statement.  And so my statement was more cautions /minimal, saying that it has gained some ground in the UK. Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 10:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
21052 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21050 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-21 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.311271200E09 +++$+++ Cool! And, on behalf of readers, thanks to both of you for your work and vigilance on this. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::::Cool! And, on behalf of readers, thanks to both of you for your work and vigilance on this. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 11:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

283195 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283195 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-12 05:06:00 +++$+++ 1.165928760E09 +++$+++ We need your vote on Macca's talk page about which section to fork. (1,000 words less and we have it in the bag...) -- +++$+++ We need your vote on Macca's talk page about which section to fork. (1,000 words less and we have it in the bag...) --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 05:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
283196 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283195 +++$+++ 283195 +++$+++ 2006-12-12 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.165980120E09 +++$+++ Lol, thanks for the funny stuff (which always makes me laugh a lot) and the good advice. Ta very much, r'kid. -- +++$+++ :Lol, thanks for the funny stuff (which always makes me laugh a lot) and the good advice. Ta very much, r'kid. --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 19:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
283197 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283195 +++$+++ 283196 +++$+++ 2006-12-13 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.166069160E09 +++$+++ I've got one for you. Where did [[Ernie Wise|Ernie Wise's]] mother live until her death? In a block of ''council'' flats in Swarcliffe, Leeds. What a tight git he was... -- +++$+++ ::I've got one for you. Where did [[Ernie Wise|Ernie Wise's]] mother live until her death? In a block of ''council'' flats in Swarcliffe, Leeds. What a tight git he was... --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 20:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

21053 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-28 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.311911640E09 +++$+++ Please stop making assertions on the FARC page that I am acting in bad faith. Four times you've said I have an \"axe to grind\". You've accused me of \"tag-bombing\" uncited material. If you have an issue with me, please address it to me. On article and article-related talk pages let's please stick to discussing the content and leave the negative personal comments for user talk pages or dispute resolution. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ Please stop making assertions on the FARC page that I am acting in bad faith. Four times you've said I have an "axe to grind". You've accused me of "tag-bombing" uncited material. If you have an issue with me, please address it to me. On article and article-related talk pages let's please stick to discussing the content and leave the negative personal comments for user talk pages or dispute resolution. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 20:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
21054 +++$+++ Darkstar1st +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.311913020E09 +++$+++ neither of you have an edit on farc discussion recently, difs plz.   +++$+++ :neither of you have an edit on farc discussion recently, difs plz.  [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 21:17, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
21055 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311916740E09 +++$+++ Will, my comments were summarizing my impression of your ''activities '' at the article.    This was not arrived at hastily, it was drawn from a large amount of observation and analysis of a large amount of material.  I feel that it provides useful context there. This is a \"forest for the trees\" observation\/opinion, something that is not visible from any individual tree.   My efforts are always focused only on the article, rather than seeking any heavy duty review\/action regarding the individual, plus, even if I am right, what you are IMHO doing is common and does not rise to that level of an issue. I view everyone, including those where I have those IMHO-issues with to be a potential future friend.  Whether it be for the article or with that in mind, I don't think that being disingenuous (vs direct and honest) would serve either purpose. But that also means I see no need to repeat it or take it any further. So maybe we can just go onward and upward there.   Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :Will, my comments were summarizing my impression of your ''activities '' at the article.    This was not arrived at hastily, it was drawn from a large amount of observation and analysis of a large amount of material.  I feel that it provides useful context there. This is a "forest for the trees" observation/opinion, something that is not visible from any individual tree.   My efforts are always focused only on the article, rather than seeking any heavy duty review/action regarding the individual, plus, even if I am right, what you are IMHO doing is common and does not rise to that level of an issue. I view everyone, including those where I have those IMHO-issues with to be a potential future friend.  Whether it be for the article or with that in mind, I don't think that being disingenuous (vs direct and honest) would serve either purpose. But that also means I see no need to repeat it or take it any further. So maybe we can just go onward and upward there.   Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 22:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
21056 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ 21055 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.311920880E09 +++$+++ If you'd care to explain what \"axe\" I have to grind in this matter, as I've requested repeatedly, that'd be helpful. Meantime, please stop making unproven accusations about my motives. I am not the subject of the FARC - the article is. If you make further comments of that type I will redact them as personal attacks. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :: If you'd care to explain what "axe" I have to grind in this matter, as I've requested repeatedly, that'd be helpful. Meantime, please stop making unproven accusations about my motives. I am not the subject of the FARC - the article is. If you make further comments of that type I will redact them as personal attacks. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 23:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
21057 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ 21056 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.311921540E09 +++$+++ Your first sentence conflicts with your last sentence.  From my end I never had anything planned beyond that context comment\/opinion, and have no need or plans to to say it again.  Maybe that settles it.  Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::Your first sentence conflicts with your last sentence.  From my end I never had anything planned beyond that context comment/opinion, and have no need or plans to to say it again.  Maybe that settles it.  Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 23:39, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
21058 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ 21057 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311922140E09 +++$+++ In my last sentence I was referring to your personal comments at FARC. My first sentence is in regard to this thread here. If you're unwilling to document your accusations I'd appreciate it if you'd redact them yourself. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::::In my last sentence I was referring to your personal comments at FARC. My first sentence is in regard to this thread here. If you're unwilling to document your accusations I'd appreciate it if you'd redact them yourself. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 23:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
21059 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ 21058 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311922920E09 +++$+++ OK, if you force me to.  (But first, correcting, there were comments about ''behavior''.)     You have made a concerted effort to spin every possible thing there as badly as possible.  Including very negative (bordering on insulting) adjectives regarding what are two highly respected and accurate sources on the topic (the book and the organization)     And you have \"history\" with the main person that was active on this earlier in the process, and IMHO were clearly battling with them. Finally, late in the process, when the other issues looked mostly resolved, you went through and, in one blitz, tagged 11 non-controversial items.   IMHO this (at the forest for the trees level) this clearly looks like someone on a mission to get it's FA status removed rather than someone who is approaching it objectively.  Again, I wasn't going to get into this but you insisted. Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::::OK, if you force me to.  (But first, correcting, there were comments about ''behavior''.)     You have made a concerted effort to spin every possible thing there as badly as possible.  Including very negative (bordering on insulting) adjectives regarding what are two highly respected and accurate sources on the topic (the book and the organization)     And you have "history" with the main person that was active on this earlier in the process, and IMHO were clearly battling with them. Finally, late in the process, when the other issues looked mostly resolved, you went through and, in one blitz, tagged 11 non-controversial items.   IMHO this (at the forest for the trees level) this clearly looks like someone on a mission to get it's FA status removed rather than someone who is approaching it objectively.  Again, I wasn't going to get into this but you insisted. Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 00:02, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21060 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.311924300E09 +++$+++ I have not addressed every issue with the article, as many of them are irrelevant. I haven't questioned the quality of the prose, for example. The only issue where I've made a consistent negative comments is about the quality of the field guide. But I don't have an axe-to-grind about that book - I just don't think that it should be used as the basis of an FA. Rather than acknowledge that concern and arguing against it, you've made your comments persona, and accused me of having an undescribed motive. You don't say which \"main person\" I have a history with in this regard. I've been working on the article since 2010.  Of the editors who've participated in the FARC, the only one who contributed to the article earlier than me is Gadget850, and I have no particular history with him that I recall. Please tell me to whom you are referring. As for the tags, the uncited material has been a problem that needed to be solved to meet current FA standards. I asked you before when the appropriate time would have been to add the tags, and you never answered. Adding citation tags is not disruptive - the purpose is to point to text which needs improvement. Again, there has been no reason for you to be making so many personal remarks in a FARC. It's unbecoming an experienced editor. I've redacted your most recent personal remarks.  &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::::::I have not addressed every issue with the article, as many of them are irrelevant. I haven't questioned the quality of the prose, for example. The only issue where I've made a consistent negative comments is about the quality of the field guide. But I don't have an axe-to-grind about that book - I just don't think that it should be used as the basis of an FA. Rather than acknowledge that concern and arguing against it, you've made your comments persona, and accused me of having an undescribed motive. You don't say which "main person" I have a history with in this regard. I've been working on the article since 2010.  Of the editors who've participated in the FARC, the only one who contributed to the article earlier than me is Gadget850, and I have no particular history with him that I recall. Please tell me to whom you are referring. As for the tags, the uncited material has been a problem that needed to be solved to meet current FA standards. I asked you before when the appropriate time would have been to add the tags, and you never answered. Adding citation tags is not disruptive - the purpose is to point to text which needs improvement. Again, there has been no reason for you to be making so many personal remarks in a FARC. It's unbecoming an experienced editor. I've redacted your most recent personal remarks.  &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 00:25, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21061 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.311925080E09 +++$+++ I disagree, but am not carrying this any further.  <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::::::::I disagree, but am not carrying this any further.  <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 00:38, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21062 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 02:19:00 +++$+++ 1.311931140E09 +++$+++ Who is the editor with whom you said I have a history? &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::::::::Who is the editor with whom you said I have a history? &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 02:19, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21063 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311967800E09 +++$+++ The person you were battling with early in the FARC and at the rs noticeboard. You have been incessantly trying to ramp this up.   Again, I am not going any farther. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::::::::::The person you were battling with early in the FARC and at the rs noticeboard. You have been incessantly trying to ramp this up.   Again, I am not going any farther. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 12:30, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21064 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21053 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.311998640E09 +++$+++ Do you mean Darkstar1st? If so then you'll find he followed me to that FARC, not the other way around. You seem to be making your judgments based on incorrect data. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::::::::::Do you mean Darkstar1st? If so then you'll find he followed me to that FARC, not the other way around. You seem to be making your judgments based on incorrect data. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 21:04, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

283201 +++$+++ Proteus +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-23 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166945280E09 +++$+++ There's really nothing to discuss. The only way you could think an MBE isn't a person is if you don't know what it stands for, which isn't really a valid excuse given that it's linked to in the article.  +++$+++ There's really nothing to discuss. The only way you could think an MBE isn't a person is if you don't know what it stands for, which isn't really a valid excuse given that it's linked to in the article. [[User:Proteus|Proteus]] [[User_talk:Proteus|(Talk)]] 23:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
283202 +++$+++ Proteus +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283201 +++$+++ 283201 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.166945580E09 +++$+++ And yes, of course I've heard of the 3RR. I've blocked people for breaking it. What was your point...?  +++$+++ :And yes, of course I've heard of the 3RR. I've blocked people for breaking it. What was your point...? [[User:Proteus|Proteus]] [[User_talk:Proteus|(Talk)]] 23:33, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
283203 +++$+++ Proteus +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283201 +++$+++ 283202 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.166945760E09 +++$+++ What's that supposed to mean?  +++$+++ ::What's that supposed to mean? [[User:Proteus|Proteus]] [[User_talk:Proteus|(Talk)]] 23:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
283204 +++$+++ Proteus +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283201 +++$+++ 283203 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.166946060E09 +++$+++ Since I haven't broken it, I still don't know what you're talking about.  +++$+++ :::Since I haven't broken it, I still don't know what you're talking about. [[User:Proteus|Proteus]] [[User_talk:Proteus|(Talk)]] 23:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

545348 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-14 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.216079400E09 +++$+++ FYI: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost\/Newsroom\/Suggestions&diff=225625480&oldid=225580103]   +++$+++ FYI: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions&diff=225625480&oldid=225580103]  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
545349 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545348 +++$+++ 545348 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.216082160E09 +++$+++ Oh, well; now they've got it twice :-)   +++$+++ : Oh, well; now they've got it twice :-)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

265654 +++$+++ Sarvagnya +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265654 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-17 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.163811480E09 +++$+++ Hope this helps.   +++$+++ Hope this helps.  [[User:Sarvagnya|Sarvagnya]] 16:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
265655 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265654 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.163811780E09 +++$+++ It does help. Thanks!  +++$+++ ::It does help. Thanks! [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 17:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

545350 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-14 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.216095240E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:TimVickers&curid=5755643&diff=225623736&oldid=225607983 Nice work]. So do people show up on GeneWiki and edit-war to promote their favorite genes and defame other genes? Is there a GeneWiki Review where people can go to gripe about cabals and admin abuse? :) ''' +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:TimVickers&curid=5755643&diff=225623736&oldid=225607983 Nice work]. So do people show up on GeneWiki and edit-war to promote their favorite genes and defame other genes? Is there a GeneWiki Review where people can go to gripe about cabals and admin abuse? :) '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 21:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
545351 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545350 +++$+++ 545350 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 21:18:00 +++$+++ 1.216095480E09 +++$+++ \"The most vicious fights in the world happen in Irish pubs and academic journals.\"  +++$+++ :"The most vicious fights in the world happen in Irish pubs and academic journals." [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 21:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
545352 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545350 +++$+++ 545351 +++$+++ 2008-07-14 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.216096200E09 +++$+++ Ah yes. \"The fighting in academia is so vicious precisely because the stakes are so small.\" Actually, I prefer the remark of a famous physician-scientist, who said: ''\"I knew I'd been in academic medicine too long when I was watching ''[[Amadeus (film)|Amadeus]]'' and found myself rooting for Salieri.\"'' ''' +++$+++ ::Ah yes. "The fighting in academia is so vicious precisely because the stakes are so small." Actually, I prefer the remark of a famous physician-scientist, who said: ''"I knew I'd been in academic medicine too long when I was watching ''[[Amadeus (film)|Amadeus]]'' and found myself rooting for Salieri."'' '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 21:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

571489 +++$+++ Glen S +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571489 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-26 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.172516460E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Dfrg.msc/Admin coaching|Here we go!]] ;) It's a start anyway... take your time mate :) '''[[User talk:Glen S|Glen]]''' 11:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
571490 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571489 +++$+++ 571489 +++$+++ 2007-02-27 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.172580240E09 +++$+++ Wow. Those are the '''hardest''' questions I've ever come across. I'll be a while. Thanks though, everything looks great. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Wow. Those are the '''hardest''' questions I've ever come across. I'll be a while. Thanks though, everything looks great. Cheers, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 04:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

21065 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.311999180E09 +++$+++ No, not Darkstar, not Gadget, but you already knew that. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ No, not Darkstar, not Gadget, but you already knew that. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 21:13, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21066 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.312000740E09 +++$+++ Excuse me, \"Dreadstar\" - I get them mixed up. Regardless, that user followed me there, not the other way around.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review\/History_of_merit_badges_(Boy_Scouts_of_America)\/archive1&action=history] It's absurd to accuse me of pursuing the FARC in order to go after that editor. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :Excuse me, "Dreadstar" - I get them mixed up. Regardless, that user followed me there, not the other way around.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/History_of_merit_badges_(Boy_Scouts_of_America)/archive1&action=history] It's absurd to accuse me of pursuing the FARC in order to go after that editor. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 21:39, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21067 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ 21066 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312001220E09 +++$+++ That bears no resemblance to what I said. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::That bears no resemblance to what I said. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 21:47, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21068 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ 21067 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.312005540E09 +++$+++ Then please clarify how my involvement with the FARC was due to having an \"axe to grind\" regarding Dreadstar. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::Then please clarify how my involvement with the FARC was due to having an "axe to grind" regarding Dreadstar. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 22:59, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21069 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ 21068 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.312006980E09 +++$+++ You keep inventing things that I never said, wanting me to discuss the things I never said, and ignoring what I ''did'' say. I have no time for such games, and \"games\" is putting it nicely. Signing off. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ ::::You keep inventing things that I never said, wanting me to discuss the things I never said, and ignoring what I ''did'' say. I have no time for such games, and "games" is putting it nicely. Signing off. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 23:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21070 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.312008300E09 +++$+++ I asked you why you said <s>four<\/s> three times that I am participating in the FARC because of an \"axe to grind\". I asked you what grounds you had for making that accusation and you eventually replied that I \"have \"history\" with the main person that was active on this earlier in the process\". It appears that the person in question is Dreadstar. Yet it's clear that my involvement in the FARC precedes his. It would be more accurate to say that he has an axe to grind with me than the other way around. These faulty, unsupported personal attacks are very disruptive - just look at the FARC page. I see there was a complaint about similar activity posted to [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts\/archive104#Unfounded accusations of gaming Wiki-policies to push POV in articles]] just a few months ago. Please avoid making these kinds of accusations again. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::::::I asked you why you said <s>four</s> three times that I am participating in the FARC because of an "axe to grind". I asked you what grounds you had for making that accusation and you eventually replied that I "have "history" with the main person that was active on this earlier in the process". It appears that the person in question is Dreadstar. Yet it's clear that my involvement in the FARC precedes his. It would be more accurate to say that he has an axe to grind with me than the other way around. These faulty, unsupported personal attacks are very disruptive - just look at the FARC page. I see there was a complaint about similar activity posted to [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts/archive104#Unfounded accusations of gaming Wiki-policies to push POV in articles]] just a few months ago. Please avoid making these kinds of accusations again. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 23:45, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21071 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.312010100E09 +++$+++ You conveniently neglected to mention the unanimous finding which that the complaint was unfounded, at which time the person who made the report got into a battle with one of the people at the board. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::::::You conveniently neglected to mention the unanimous finding which that the complaint was unfounded, at which time the person who made the report got into a battle with one of the people at the board. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 00:15, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
21072 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.312011240E09 +++$+++ Be that as it may, your accusations are incompatible with [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:AGF]]. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ ::::::::Be that as it may, your accusations are incompatible with [[WP:CIVIL]] and [[WP:AGF]]. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 00:34, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
21073 +++$+++ Xenophrenic +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.312019760E09 +++$+++ He conviently neglected to prevaricate, you mean.  Of the 4 participants in that discussion, you and myself included, two of us requested that you address your personal attack \u2014 a request with which you eventually [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&diff=prev&oldid=426752592 complied] (thank you for the redaction) \u2014 while the 4th participant recused himself from the conversation after being forcefully admonished to either substantiate the \"bullshit\" he was spouting or desist.  It saddens me that you didn't take away from that discussion the lesson that frequent commenting-on-editors will eventually bend people a bit too far -- regardless of how much justification is used to rationalize said commenting <small>(e.g.; I meant your \"actions\/activities\", not \"you\"!  Don't take my insulting comment about you personally, because it's \"common\" and no big deal, lots of people are as bad as you!  No, I can't give you a specific example (tree), because I've developed these opinions I'm now spouting over a long period of observation! Don't be upset over my insulting comments about you; let's just drop it and now we can be friends!)<\/small>. Sincerely,  +++$+++ ::::::::He conviently neglected to prevaricate, you mean.  Of the 4 participants in that discussion, you and myself included, two of us requested that you address your personal attack — a request with which you eventually [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&diff=prev&oldid=426752592 complied] (thank you for the redaction) — while the 4th participant recused himself from the conversation after being forcefully admonished to either substantiate the "bullshit" he was spouting or desist.  It saddens me that you didn't take away from that discussion the lesson that frequent commenting-on-editors will eventually bend people a bit too far -- regardless of how much justification is used to rationalize said commenting <small>(e.g.; I meant your "actions/activities", not "you"!  Don't take my insulting comment about you personally, because it's "common" and no big deal, lots of people are as bad as you!  No, I can't give you a specific example (tree), because I've developed these opinions I'm now spouting over a long period of observation! Don't be upset over my insulting comments about you; let's just drop it and now we can be friends!)</small>. Sincerely, [[User:Xenophrenic|Xenophrenic]] ([[User talk:Xenophrenic|talk]]) 02:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
21074 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.312020720E09 +++$+++ What you just said bears no resemblance to what happened there.  At least in Wikipedia the record is preserved of what actually happened. <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :::::::::What you just said bears no resemblance to what happened there.  At least in Wikipedia the record is preserved of what actually happened. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 03:12, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
21075 +++$+++ Darkstar1st +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ 21067 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.312003920E09 +++$+++ wow am i lost, i was thinking farc like the freedom fighter group advocating native american rights and you link a boyscout merit badge.  i would love to weigh in on the topic but have no idea whats going on here.  even though i disagree with you both on occasion, i would miss either of you.  either drop it, or let me get in a few words.   +++$+++ :::wow am i lost, i was thinking farc like the freedom fighter group advocating native american rights and you link a boyscout merit badge.  i would love to weigh in on the topic but have no idea whats going on here.  even though i disagree with you both on occasion, i would miss either of you.  either drop it, or let me get in a few words.  [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 22:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21076 +++$+++ Darkstar1st +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ 21075 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.312009740E09 +++$+++ '''the universe collapse under the weight of your obstinacy'''    +++$+++ ::::'''the universe collapse under the weight of your obstinacy'''   [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 00:09, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
21077 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ 21076 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.312011240E09 +++$+++ Darkstar1st, why are you interrupting the postings here? If you want to see the diffs go look at the FARC revision history. North8000, the editor with whom I'm holding this discussion, knows perfectly well when and where he made the posts in question. &nbsp; <b> +++$+++ :::::Darkstar1st, why are you interrupting the postings here? If you want to see the diffs go look at the FARC revision history. North8000, the editor with whom I'm holding this discussion, knows perfectly well when and where he made the posts in question. &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 00:34, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
21078 +++$+++ Darkstar1st +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ 21077 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.312011600E09 +++$+++ i have, and neither of you are in them.  normally i would butt out, but farc is one of my favorite topics, like a jeff spicoli robinhood.  it would have taken less keystrokes to post the text...    +++$+++ ::::::i have, and neither of you are in them.  normally i would butt out, but farc is one of my favorite topics, like a jeff spicoli robinhood.  it would have taken less keystrokes to post the text...   [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 00:40, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
21079 +++$+++ Darkstar1st +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21065 +++$+++ 21078 +++$+++ 2011-07-30 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.312011720E09 +++$+++ is there some reason you dont want me to see your post?    +++$+++ :::::::is there some reason you dont want me to see your post?   [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 00:42, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

283211 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283211 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-23 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.166946060E09 +++$+++ Where have you been? I thought you had fallen under a whelk, or something! +++$+++ Where have you been? I thought you had fallen under a whelk, or something![[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 23:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
283212 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283211 +++$+++ 283211 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.166946540E09 +++$+++ I may have to go out and buy the blasted thing - there doesn't seem to be a cd sized pressie with my name on it under the Chrissy tree! +++$+++ :I may have to go out and buy the blasted thing - there doesn't seem to be a cd sized pressie with my name on it under the Chrissy tree![[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 23:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

283213 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283213 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-23 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.166946960E09 +++$+++ Where you bin hiding Joe? I'm fecking pissing meself here! Thanks for that man, I luv yer!! Cheers  +++$+++ Where you bin hiding Joe? I'm fecking pissing meself here! Thanks for that man, I luv yer!! Cheers [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 23:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
283214 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283213 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.166947440E09 +++$+++ Same to you Joe, '''Have a really good one''' like! Cheers La,  +++$+++ ::Same to you Joe, '''Have a really good one''' like! Cheers La, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 00:04, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

615181 +++$+++ NE2 +++$+++ JonathanDP81 +++$+++ 615181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-29 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.170100740E09 +++$+++ I don't understand [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=BMT_Astoria_Line&curid=1696037&diff=104061312&oldid=102063603 this edit]; wouldn't you want to change what's displayed as well as what's linked? -- +++$+++ I don't understand [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BMT_Astoria_Line&curid=1696037&diff=104061312&oldid=102063603 this edit]; wouldn't you want to change what's displayed as well as what's linked? --[[User talk:NE2|NE2]] 11:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
615182 +++$+++ JonathanDP81 +++$+++ JonathanDP81 +++$+++ 615181 +++$+++ 615181 +++$+++ 2007-01-29 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.170100860E09 +++$+++ Yes, I would. My mistake, thank you for fixing it. \u2014 +++$+++ *Yes, I would. My mistake, thank you for fixing it. —[[User:JonathanDP81|JonathanDP81]] ([[User talk:JonathanDP81|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/JonathanDP81|contribs]]) 12:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

545360 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-19 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.216523640E09 +++$+++ You've made quite a few edits there. I found this FA to have an awful lead focusing on epidemiology and not providing a basic summary. I've written one now, but in the interest of ''brilliant prose'', could you have a copy-edit? Thanks. -- +++$+++ You've made quite a few edits there. I found this FA to have an awful lead focusing on epidemiology and not providing a basic summary. I've written one now, but in the interest of ''brilliant prose'', could you have a copy-edit? Thanks. --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 20:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
545361 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545360 +++$+++ 545360 +++$+++ 2008-07-19 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.216527540E09 +++$+++ I'd be honoured to be nominated by you, thanks. -- +++$+++ :I'd be honoured to be nominated by you, thanks. --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 21:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

265656 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.163741880E09 +++$+++ Hi, I found [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sivasamudram&oldid=86754383 this article] but I didn't see another.  Is there another article  on the town with more details?  -- +++$+++ Hi, I found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sivasamudram&oldid=86754383 this article] but I didn't see another.  Is there another article  on the town with more details?  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 21:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265657 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265656 +++$+++ 265656 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.163744280E09 +++$+++ As soon as I saw this [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sivasamudram&direction=next&oldid=86754383] with the gratuitous \"citation needed\" tags I new something was going on. I stopped writing the article and didn't keep the information because there was no point. That was the last straw. I am not going through that again because 999 can get away with it. (That's what I mean when I say by only look superficially, harm is done.) All you are doing right now is bring back into my memory how awful things were that day.  So I am not open-minded to your defending 999 and in no way am I going to be involved in these articles again. Sorry! But this is quickly becoming a bad day just reliving this.   +++$+++ :As soon as I saw this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sivasamudram&direction=next&oldid=86754383] with the gratuitous "citation needed" tags I new something was going on. I stopped writing the article and didn't keep the information because there was no point. That was the last straw. I am not going through that again because 999 can get away with it. (That's what I mean when I say by only look superficially, harm is done.) All you are doing right now is bring back into my memory how awful things were that day.  So I am not open-minded to your defending 999 and in no way am I going to be involved in these articles again. Sorry! But this is quickly becoming a bad day just reliving this.  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 22:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265658 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265656 +++$+++ 265657 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.163745600E09 +++$+++ Do you see that [[Sivasamudram]] and [[Somanathapura]] are not the same place? And that the Falls are a third place? There is lots of interesting possibilities there, a power plant, dams... If a person is interested in water and energy and such as I am, then it is a joy to explore and dig up information -- to round out and figure it out and connect it all up. That is what this \"merge instantly\" method snuffs out completely. It takes away all joy. If there were a point I would merge articles if you wanted me to, but everything interesting, all possibilities of learning something new and fascinating, of a world opening up are now removed. (This is aside from 999 using you again.)  +++$+++ ::Do you see that [[Sivasamudram]] and [[Somanathapura]] are not the same place? And that the Falls are a third place? There is lots of interesting possibilities there, a power plant, dams... If a person is interested in water and energy and such as I am, then it is a joy to explore and dig up information -- to round out and figure it out and connect it all up. That is what this "merge instantly" method snuffs out completely. It takes away all joy. If there were a point I would merge articles if you wanted me to, but everything interesting, all possibilities of learning something new and fascinating, of a world opening up are now removed. (This is aside from 999 using you again.) [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 22:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265659 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265656 +++$+++ 265658 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.163745000E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry that the discussion has stirred painful feelings.  I will try to avoid mentioning it in the future.  I hope your evening goes better.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::I'm sorry that the discussion has stirred painful feelings.  I will try to avoid mentioning it in the future.  I hope your evening goes better.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265660 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265656 +++$+++ 265659 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.163746080E09 +++$+++ Please, let's drop it for now.  I need to go eat anyway.  Please take care.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::::Please, let's drop it for now.  I need to go eat anyway.  Please take care.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265661 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265656 +++$+++ 265660 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.163810940E09 +++$+++ No need to apologize.  No harm was done.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::::No need to apologize.  No harm was done.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 16:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
265662 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265656 +++$+++ 265660 +++$+++ 2006-11-17 16:54:00 +++$+++ 1.163811240E09 +++$+++ By the way, in my \"youth\" as a Wikipedia editor, I used to involve myself in naming disputes, but came to feel involvement in such disputes was not something that I wanted to continue.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :::::By the way, in my "youth" as a Wikipedia editor, I used to involve myself in naming disputes, but came to feel involvement in such disputes was not something that I wanted to continue.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 16:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
265663 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265656 +++$+++ 265662 +++$+++ 2006-11-18 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.163844900E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I hope your day has gone well.  The issues in the message you left me are related to things that you said made your day yesterday unpleasant.  If I handle those matters, they may not come out the way you desire.  If that is OK with you, then I will handle them, but if you care about the outcome, you should be involved yourself.  Please let me know whether you desire to be involved.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::::::Hi Mattisse, I hope your day has gone well.  The issues in the message you left me are related to things that you said made your day yesterday unpleasant.  If I handle those matters, they may not come out the way you desire.  If that is OK with you, then I will handle them, but if you care about the outcome, you should be involved yourself.  Please let me know whether you desire to be involved.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 02:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

571491 +++$+++ Glen S +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-28 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.172672280E09 +++$+++ Believe it or not '''every one''' of those questions has been asked in at least one or more past RfAs - gotta make sure you're prepared! ;) You didnt think I'd make this super easy did you? ''' +++$+++ Believe it or not '''every one''' of those questions has been asked in at least one or more past RfAs - gotta make sure you're prepared! ;) You didnt think I'd make this super easy did you? '''[[User talk:Glen S|Glen]]''' 06:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
571492 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571491 +++$+++ 571491 +++$+++ 2007-02-28 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.172672520E09 +++$+++ I'm actually answering them now. The harder the question(s), the better. I've never really though of what I have done, more what I'm doing. This is interesting. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I'm actually answering them now. The harder the question(s), the better. I've never really though of what I have done, more what I'm doing. This is interesting. Cheers, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 06:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
571493 +++$+++ Dar-Ape +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571491 +++$+++ 571491 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.172301600E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Dar-Ape|Dar]]-[[User talk:Dar-Ape|Ape]] 23:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

283220 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-07 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.168212060E09 +++$+++ Please answer (on a stamped and self-addressed postcard please) on our talk page. (This might be more interesting than talking about MBEs... :)  +++$+++ Please answer (on a stamped and self-addressed postcard please) on our talk page. (This might be more interesting than talking about MBEs... :) [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde, Mr Hornby, and Sir Sean de Garde]] 15:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
283221 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283220 +++$+++ 283220 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 12:01:00 +++$+++ 1.168632060E09 +++$+++ We've been through this before. It was quite funny the first time, now it's just boring. Come up with something original and I'll play.-- +++$+++ :We've been through this before. It was quite funny the first time, now it's just boring. Come up with something original and I'll play.--[[User:Crestville|The one, the only, the original Crestville]] 12:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
283222 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283220 +++$+++ 283221 +++$+++ 2007-01-12 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.168671000E09 +++$+++ The \"one, the only, the original Crestville\" is ''instantly'' recognisable for his exemplary humour and intelligence. If the imposter can come anywhere near those dizzy heights, he\/she\/it should be happy (but change the 'effin user name). There you go; stick that in your pipe and smoke it. :))  +++$+++ ::The "one, the only, the original Crestville" is ''instantly'' recognisable for his exemplary humour and intelligence. If the imposter can come anywhere near those dizzy heights, he/she/it should be happy (but change the 'effin user name). There you go; stick that in your pipe and smoke it. :)) [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 22:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

545366 +++$+++ Snideology +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545366 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-21 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.216634580E09 +++$+++ Outside of the title, I was unable to find an injunction to what I added to [[Agkistrodon piscivorus]]. I note that you already removed the text, and I will certainly accept that, based upon what I perceive to be your far superior knowledge about both the subject & Wikipedia policies. However, I am unclear as to both why this is disallowed & why it may impair the quality of the article. I am aware (after your message & reading the [[Wikipedia:Medical disclaimer]]) of the inherent danger of attempting to offer medical advise of any kind; yet it seems to me that the basic mention I made might be expected to be found in an encyclopedia. Either way I appreciate your kind editing advice (and by now have bored you quite to death), and desire, if you could, a clarification about this +++$+++ Outside of the title, I was unable to find an injunction to what I added to [[Agkistrodon piscivorus]]. I note that you already removed the text, and I will certainly accept that, based upon what I perceive to be your far superior knowledge about both the subject & Wikipedia policies. However, I am unclear as to both why this is disallowed & why it may impair the quality of the article. I am aware (after your message & reading the [[Wikipedia:Medical disclaimer]]) of the inherent danger of attempting to offer medical advise of any kind; yet it seems to me that the basic mention I made might be expected to be found in an encyclopedia. Either way I appreciate your kind editing advice (and by now have bored you quite to death), and desire, if you could, a clarification about this[[User:Snideology|Snideology]] ([[User talk:Snideology|talk]]) 03:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
545367 +++$+++ Snideology +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545366 +++$+++ 545366 +++$+++ 2008-07-22 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.216715880E09 +++$+++ That was very clear & concise information. It specifically described the failings of my edit & how to simply correct such in the future. Rarely am I corrected with such finesse. Frankly, it is advice I can use both within & outside of Wikipedia. A catnip mouse to Loki for your help  +++$+++ :That was very clear & concise information. It specifically described the failings of my edit & how to simply correct such in the future. Rarely am I corrected with such finesse. Frankly, it is advice I can use both within & outside of Wikipedia. A catnip mouse to Loki for your help [[User:Snideology|Snideology]] ([[User talk:Snideology|talk]]) 01:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

21081 +++$+++ Auerfeld +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-29 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311979980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Auerfeld|Auerfeld]] ([[User talk:Auerfeld|talk]]) 15:53, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
21082 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ North8000 +++$+++ 21081 +++$+++ 21081 +++$+++ 2011-07-29 16:33:00 +++$+++ 1.311982380E09 +++$+++ When I said \"not sure about the info box\", I said that because IMHO the info box, including the very brief statements that it makes, should include only stuff which is not seriously contested.  Including \"British\" as a nationality IMHO would not meet this test.   Possibly calling him simply \"American\" also does not meet this test.   If the latter were true, then a remedy might be to leave it out of the info box and just explain it in more depth in the article.   Sincerely, <font color =\"#0000cc\">''North8000''<\/font> ( +++$+++ :When I said "not sure about the info box", I said that because IMHO the info box, including the very brief statements that it makes, should include only stuff which is not seriously contested.  Including "British" as a nationality IMHO would not meet this test.   Possibly calling him simply "American" also does not meet this test.   If the latter were true, then a remedy might be to leave it out of the info box and just explain it in more depth in the article.   Sincerely, <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 16:33, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

283226 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-16 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.169005020E09 +++$+++ Now listen here, young Crestville, I'm waiting for your quote-thingy about my dear John phoning me when the fool was with that black-haired witch in New York. He always paid for the trans-atlantic calls, by the way, so don't think I have the slightest intention of paying you, you cheeky young man, because I prefer to spend my earnings on respectable things, and not waste money on this thing you call Wiki-'Peedles'. Right - I'm off to feed the cats.  +++$+++ Now listen here, young Crestville, I'm waiting for your quote-thingy about my dear John phoning me when the fool was with that black-haired witch in New York. He always paid for the trans-atlantic calls, by the way, so don't think I have the slightest intention of paying you, you cheeky young man, because I prefer to spend my earnings on respectable things, and not waste money on this thing you call Wiki-'Peedles'. Right - I'm off to feed the cats. [[User:Andreasegde|Mary (Mimi) Smith]] 19:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
283227 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283226 +++$+++ 283226 +++$+++ 2007-01-17 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.169083140E09 +++$+++ Bugger, I'll have to see if my local 'W. H Schmidt' has a copy.  +++$+++ :Bugger, I'll have to see if my local 'W. H Schmidt' has a copy. [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 17:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

283228 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-18 20:45:00 +++$+++ 1.169181900E09 +++$+++ It said, in the last Beatles' newsletter, that \"Sir Sean de Garde appears to have developed multiple personalities.\" This is very true (and made me laugh an awful lot) but it is necessary when one is faced with talking to one on one's pages that one has contributed to. (Work that one out... :) The changing of one's name brings tremendous amusement to one - as other editors are wont to do the same. I refer you to members, Vera, Chuck, and Dave, LessHeard vanU, and Crestville, who have given one a terrific amount of pleasure in the general 'laughing gear' area, because of their inovative choices of Nom de plumes. One can only hope that this practice does not offend one's own sense of normality. One can only live in hope. :))  +++$+++ It said, in the last Beatles' newsletter, that "Sir Sean de Garde appears to have developed multiple personalities." This is very true (and made me laugh an awful lot) but it is necessary when one is faced with talking to one on one's pages that one has contributed to. (Work that one out... :) The changing of one's name brings tremendous amusement to one - as other editors are wont to do the same. I refer you to members, Vera, Chuck, and Dave, LessHeard vanU, and Crestville, who have given one a terrific amount of pleasure in the general 'laughing gear' area, because of their inovative choices of Nom de plumes. One can only hope that this practice does not offend one's own sense of normality. One can only live in hope. :)) [[User:Andreasegde|Who am I?]] 20:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
283229 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283228 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-19 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.169248020E09 +++$+++ I know you do Joe. I was in doing P.E. yesterday, and LFB were receiving 15 three nines calls every two mins!! Cheers La,  +++$+++ ::I know you do Joe. I was in doing P.E. yesterday, and LFB were receiving 15 three nines calls every two mins!! Cheers La, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 15:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

283230 +++$+++ Pendragon39 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283230 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-20 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.169354460E09 +++$+++ In case my actions weren't clear, I deleted the discussion because I believe it violates the policy on biographies of living persons. Talk pages are not exempt  +++$+++ In case my actions weren't clear, I deleted the discussion because I believe it violates the policy on biographies of living persons. Talk pages are not exempt [[User:Pendragon39|Pendragon39]] 20:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
283231 +++$+++ Pendragon39 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283230 +++$+++ 283230 +++$+++ 2007-01-21 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.169428860E09 +++$+++ By all means, be pedantic  +++$+++ :By all means, be pedantic [[User:Pendragon39|Pendragon39]] 17:21, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

527803 +++$+++ Wrad +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-09 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.181439900E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Ashlerferlcrying.jpg]] was deleted by you under the grounds that it had an invalid fair use claim.  In fact, that wasn't the issue originally posted at all.  It was up for deletion because someone thought it could be replaced by a free image.  And even that proposal was factually disputed as not being a reason for deletion in this case by a number of editors, yet all of this seems to have been ignored. The image was deleted for a reason not even related to the original disussion, without warning.  Why was this?  +++$+++ [[:Image:Ashlerferlcrying.jpg]] was deleted by you under the grounds that it had an invalid fair use claim.  In fact, that wasn't the issue originally posted at all.  It was up for deletion because someone thought it could be replaced by a free image.  And even that proposal was factually disputed as not being a reason for deletion in this case by a number of editors, yet all of this seems to have been ignored. The image was deleted for a reason not even related to the original disussion, without warning.  Why was this? [[User:Wrad|Wrad]] 18:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
527804 +++$+++ hmwith +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527803 +++$+++ 527803 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.181516220E09 +++$+++ As the original uploader, I agree with Wrad. What was invalid about the fair use claim? <font face=\"tahoma small cap\"><span style=\"border: 1px solid #828282; padding: 1px;\"> +++$+++ :As the original uploader, I agree with Wrad. What was invalid about the fair use claim? <font face="tahoma small cap"><span style="border: 1px solid #828282; padding: 1px;">[[User:hmwith|<span style="background: #FFFFFF; color: #828282;">hmw</span>]][[User talk:hmwith|<span style="background: #828282; color: #FFFFFF;">ith</span>]]</span></font> 15:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
527805 +++$+++ hmwith +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527803 +++$+++ 527804 +++$+++ 2007-06-11 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.181594820E09 +++$+++ Could you please provide respond? <font face=\"tahoma small cap\"><span style=\"border: 1px solid #828282; padding: 1px;\"> +++$+++ ::Could you please provide respond? <font face="tahoma small cap"><span style="border: 1px solid #828282; padding: 1px;">[[User:hmwith|<span style="background: #FFFFFF; color: #828282;">hmw</span>]][[User talk:hmwith|<span style="background: #828282; color: #FFFFFF;">ith</span>]]</span></font> 13:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

21092 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-24 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.180009680E09 +++$+++ Hi Sean,  I sent a note [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Rusty201&diff=prev&oldid=133109187] to  +++$+++ Hi Sean,  I sent a note [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rusty201&diff=prev&oldid=133109187] to [[User:Rusty201]], but I see you have this in hand.  Good work and thanks! &mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 05:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
21093 +++$+++ Moondyne +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21092 +++$+++ 21092 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.180010160E09 +++$+++ Cool.  I thought it best to touch base so we don't edit conflict.  I'll stand back until your finished.  &mdash; +++$+++ :Cool.  I thought it best to touch base so we don't edit conflict.  I'll stand back until your finished.  &mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 05:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

309350 +++$+++ Claudebernard +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-18 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.253301840E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reverting and adding back the opening of Terry Eagletone's review. Regardless of what one thinks, that's what he said! and I think balances the rather intelectual second quote rather well  +++$+++ Thanks for reverting and adding back the opening of Terry Eagletone's review. Regardless of what one thinks, that's what he said! and I think balances the rather intelectual second quote rather well [[User:Claudebernard|Claudebernard]] ([[User talk:Claudebernard|talk]]) 12:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
309351 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309350 +++$+++ 309350 +++$+++ 2009-09-18 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.253303040E09 +++$+++ My oops, have commented contritely on your talk page. . .  +++$+++ :My oops, have commented contritely on your talk page. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 12:44, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

283242 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-30 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.170220920E09 +++$+++ Who the fuck are you calling a [[cockney]]!? I am from the glorious Republic of [[Hounslow]], and owing to [[Heathrow Airport|London Airport (as was)]] being on my childhood doorsteps the sound of [[Bow bells]] never once engaged my shell-likes...  +++$+++ Who the fuck are you calling a [[cockney]]!? I am from the glorious Republic of [[Hounslow]], and owing to [[Heathrow Airport|London Airport (as was)]] being on my childhood doorsteps the sound of [[Bow bells]] never once engaged my shell-likes... [[User:LessHeard vanU|'Ahnslaah!]] 21:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
283243 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283242 +++$+++ 283242 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.170268860E09 +++$+++ They would have done if you had owned a telephone.  +++$+++ :They would have done if you had owned a telephone. [[User:Andreasegde|Harold Wilson’s blocked arteries]]10:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
283244 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283242 +++$+++ 283243 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.170268860E09 +++$+++ The follies of Yoof.-- +++$+++ ::The follies of Yoof.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 10:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
283245 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283242 +++$+++ 283244 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 10:41:00 +++$+++ 1.170268860E09 +++$+++ It were his parents what were to blame. Mebbe they cudn't hear them bells 'cos of the sound of them 'effin planes roaring over their heads all bleeding day an' night.  +++$+++ :::It were his parents what were to blame. Mebbe they cudn't hear them bells 'cos of the sound of them 'effin planes roaring over their heads all bleeding day an' night. [[User:Andreasegde|Margaret Thatcher's knickers]]10:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
283246 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283242 +++$+++ 283245 +++$+++ 2007-01-31 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.170270240E09 +++$+++ I accept your apology about your mistaken edits in my wonderful article: \"How to wet your pants by reading editors comments\". I will refrain from attacking your talk page with \"Celebrity body parts\" in future. Honest...  +++$+++ ::::I accept your apology about your mistaken edits in my wonderful article: "How to wet your pants by reading editors comments". I will refrain from attacking your talk page with "Celebrity body parts" in future. Honest... [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 11:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

567761 +++$+++ Dacheatcode +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-03 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.194151260E09 +++$+++ I saw your video on youtube.. thats A LOT of vandalism. +++$+++ I saw your video on youtube.. thats A LOT of vandalism.[[User:Dacheatcode|Dacheatcode]] 21:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
567762 +++$+++ Dacheatcode +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 567761 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-06 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.194392940E09 +++$+++ Yup, i am starater from youtube +++$+++ ::Yup, i am starater from youtube[[User:Dacheatcode|Dacheatcode]] 15:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

545390 +++$+++ Proteins +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545390 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-28 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.217305860E09 +++$+++ What does your schedule look like in the near future?  We should probably start to sketch plans for the workshop, and to draft a new description for Alison.  I made a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology\/ASCB workshop 2008|subpage]] as a central place for us and other interested Wikipedians to plan the workshop.  I threw out some basic ideas there, but they might be terribly obvious to you and other experienced Wikipedians.  I also contacted [[User:Phoebe|Phoebe]] and [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]], two Wikipedians I met at Wikimania, to ask for their help and advice.  I might begin writing up a tutorial for newbie scientists, but as a newbie scientist myself, I'll definitely need your help with that.  If possible, I'd like to get most of the workshop organized by the beginning of September, since I have a significant teaching load next semester.  Regards,  +++$+++ What does your schedule look like in the near future?  We should probably start to sketch plans for the workshop, and to draft a new description for Alison.  I made a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology/ASCB workshop 2008|subpage]] as a central place for us and other interested Wikipedians to plan the workshop.  I threw out some basic ideas there, but they might be terribly obvious to you and other experienced Wikipedians.  I also contacted [[User:Phoebe|Phoebe]] and [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]], two Wikipedians I met at Wikimania, to ask for their help and advice.  I might begin writing up a tutorial for newbie scientists, but as a newbie scientist myself, I'll definitely need your help with that.  If possible, I'd like to get most of the workshop organized by the beginning of September, since I have a significant teaching load next semester.  Regards, [[User:Proteins|Proteins]] ([[User talk:Proteins|talk]]) 21:31, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
545391 +++$+++ Proteins +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545390 +++$+++ 545390 +++$+++ 2008-07-29 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.217395500E09 +++$+++ That was another good suggestion you had about the potential edit conflicts.  As you asked, I made [[:Category:ASCB 2008 Wikipedia workshop participants|this category]] for the participants, although I don't know enough about Wikipedia's category tree to know where to categorize the category itself.  I also made [[:Template:ASCB workshop|this template]] that automatically categorizes the users, and transcludes a tutorial.  The participants only have to add one template to their user page.  The tutorial is just a draft, some stuff that I wish I had known when I started; I think I'll add some screenshots, etc.  +++$+++ :That was another good suggestion you had about the potential edit conflicts.  As you asked, I made [[:Category:ASCB 2008 Wikipedia workshop participants|this category]] for the participants, although I don't know enough about Wikipedia's category tree to know where to categorize the category itself.  I also made [[:Template:ASCB workshop|this template]] that automatically categorizes the users, and transcludes a tutorial.  The participants only have to add one template to their user page.  The tutorial is just a draft, some stuff that I wish I had known when I started; I think I'll add some screenshots, etc. [[User:Proteins|Proteins]] ([[User talk:Proteins|talk]]) 22:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

545393 +++$+++ Garrondo +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-30 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.217445660E09 +++$+++ You probably do not remember me but we have crossed a few times in medical articles (I have mostly edited multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer articles. I work in an investigation group very interested in genes and also network theory. I am a psychologist but I work with engineers, doctors and biologists. Today my chief has sent us an article about gene wiki published in Plos. I red it and I thought it was really interesting not only becouse the utility of these gene articles, but also because publishing such an article in Plos is a very good way of attracting high quality contributors to wikipedia. Only later I saw your name in the authors. WELL DONE. -- +++$+++ You probably do not remember me but we have crossed a few times in medical articles (I have mostly edited multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer articles. I work in an investigation group very interested in genes and also network theory. I am a psychologist but I work with engineers, doctors and biologists. Today my chief has sent us an article about gene wiki published in Plos. I red it and I thought it was really interesting not only becouse the utility of these gene articles, but also because publishing such an article in Plos is a very good way of attracting high quality contributors to wikipedia. Only later I saw your name in the authors. WELL DONE. --[[User:Garrondo|Garrondo]] ([[User talk:Garrondo|talk]]) 12:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
545394 +++$+++ Shyamal +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545393 +++$+++ 545393 +++$+++ 2008-08-01 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.217630460E09 +++$+++ The taxonomy community seems to have sat up and taken notice as well [http:\/\/markmail.org\/message\/sryu3odnr62llcjb?q=Taxacom+archives&page=1&refer=fxl33z4s75d6xjqg9]  +++$+++ :The taxonomy community seems to have sat up and taken notice as well [http://markmail.org/message/sryu3odnr62llcjb?q=Taxacom+archives&page=1&refer=fxl33z4s75d6xjqg9] [[User:Shyamal|Shyamal]] ([[User talk:Shyamal|talk]]) 15:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

545398 +++$+++ S. Dean Jameson +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-03 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.217810220E09 +++$+++ As a science guy, I thought you might be interested in looking into [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_review#Helicobacter_pylori|this FAR]] on [[Helicobacter pylori]]. I saw (I think) Sandy mention your name somewhere with regards to this article. [[Special:Contributions\/S._Dean_Jameson|'''S.''']]  +++$+++ As a science guy, I thought you might be interested in looking into [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_review#Helicobacter_pylori|this FAR]] on [[Helicobacter pylori]]. I saw (I think) Sandy mention your name somewhere with regards to this article. [[Special:Contributions/S._Dean_Jameson|'''S.''']] [[User:S. Dean Jameson|''Dean'']] [[User_talk:S. Dean Jameson|'''Jameson''']] 17:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
545399 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545398 +++$+++ 545398 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 17:39:00 +++$+++ 1.217810340E09 +++$+++ That would have been on my talk page, where I told Orangemarlin that the only chance that most med\/bio articles had at FAR was if Tim Vickers got involved.   +++$+++ : That would have been on my talk page, where I told Orangemarlin that the only chance that most med/bio articles had at FAR was if Tim Vickers got involved.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
545400 +++$+++ S. Dean Jameson +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545398 +++$+++ 545399 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.217810520E09 +++$+++ Okay. I thought it was you that had said it, but I wasn't positive, so thanks for confirming. Looking over Tim's contributions (and his recent offer of help to Wilhelmina), I thought I'd go ahead and notify him of that FAR. [[Special:Contributions\/S._Dean_Jameson|'''S.''']]  +++$+++ ::Okay. I thought it was you that had said it, but I wasn't positive, so thanks for confirming. Looking over Tim's contributions (and his recent offer of help to Wilhelmina), I thought I'd go ahead and notify him of that FAR. [[Special:Contributions/S._Dean_Jameson|'''S.''']] [[User:S. Dean Jameson|''Dean'']] [[User_talk:S. Dean Jameson|'''Jameson''']] 17:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
545401 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545398 +++$+++ 545400 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.217811540E09 +++$+++ Good thinking :-)  Except Orange had already notified him (above) and I wouldn't have let him escape for long, either :-)   +++$+++ ::: Good thinking :-)  Except Orange had already notified him (above) and I wouldn't have let him escape for long, either :-)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
545402 +++$+++ S. Dean Jameson +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545398 +++$+++ 545401 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.217812740E09 +++$+++ Oops! I skimmed his page, and didn't find anything, but sure enough, there it is. Sorry for the double post, Tim. [[Special:Contributions\/S._Dean_Jameson|'''S.''']]  +++$+++ ::::Oops! I skimmed his page, and didn't find anything, but sure enough, there it is. Sorry for the double post, Tim. [[Special:Contributions/S._Dean_Jameson|'''S.''']] [[User:S. Dean Jameson|''Dean'']] [[User_talk:S. Dean Jameson|'''Jameson''']] 18:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
545403 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545398 +++$+++ 545402 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.217813700E09 +++$+++ I keep a close eye on Tim's whereabouts, just in case [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:SandyGeorgia\/Barnstars#Other_nice_things I need to kill him someday.] :-))   +++$+++ ::::: I keep a close eye on Tim's whereabouts, just in case [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SandyGeorgia/Barnstars#Other_nice_things I need to kill him someday.] :-))  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
545404 +++$+++ S. Dean Jameson +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545398 +++$+++ 545403 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.217814360E09 +++$+++ There's an [[WP:ANI\/SandyGeorgia is threatening to kill Tim Vickers|ANI subpage]] waiting to be started... [[Special:Contributions\/S._Dean_Jameson|'''S.''']]  +++$+++ ::::::There's an [[WP:ANI/SandyGeorgia is threatening to kill Tim Vickers|ANI subpage]] waiting to be started... [[Special:Contributions/S._Dean_Jameson|'''S.''']] [[User:S. Dean Jameson|''Dean'']] [[User_talk:S. Dean Jameson|'''Jameson''']] 18:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
545405 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545398 +++$+++ 545404 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.217815740E09 +++$+++ Don't forget [[WP:ANI\/Tim Vickers personally attacks SandyGeorgia, locating her as an outlaw in Peru, and misstating the country of worship as a little known country in Central America|this ANI subpage]]. :-)  OK, I'm going to leave Tim's page alone now; I hope he's off enjoying his Sunday and the orange bar isn't making him nuts.   +++$+++ ::::::: Don't forget [[WP:ANI/Tim Vickers personally attacks SandyGeorgia, locating her as an outlaw in Peru, and misstating the country of worship as a little known country in Central America|this ANI subpage]]. :-)  OK, I'm going to leave Tim's page alone now; I hope he's off enjoying his Sunday and the orange bar isn't making him nuts.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:09, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

283255 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283255 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-10 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.171170480E09 +++$+++ The Beatles trivia is now \"The Beatles' miscellanea\". Let the trivia zealots boil their heads in oil...  +++$+++ The Beatles trivia is now "The Beatles' miscellanea". Let the trivia zealots boil their heads in oil... [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 21:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
283256 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283255 +++$+++ 283255 +++$+++ 2007-02-11 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.171239900E09 +++$+++ There's a massive difference between \"Stuff what I done - Mummy, Mummy, Look what I've made\", which is very humourous, and \"''Articles I have given birth to''\" (plus a lot of other ghastly stuff about how wonderful and unique he is). No, it's not you, Daddy Crestville... :)  +++$+++ :There's a massive difference between "Stuff what I done - Mummy, Mummy, Look what I've made", which is very humourous, and "''Articles I have given birth to''" (plus a lot of other ghastly stuff about how wonderful and unique he is). No, it's not you, Daddy Crestville... :) [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 16:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

283260 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.171696740E09 +++$+++ It's 'Andrea', BTW. I can't have Crestville thinking I'm not a transvestite with a bird's name, can I? :)))  +++$+++ It's 'Andrea', BTW. I can't have Crestville thinking I'm not a transvestite with a bird's name, can I? :))) [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 23:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
283261 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283260 +++$+++ 283260 +++$+++ 2007-02-16 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.171696620E09 +++$+++ Actually, you may be able to help! Do you have any siblings who are doing, or have recently done, English Language GCSE? Or any of your fellow students. Can you find any decent course books which show how proper nouns are dealt with? Whilst style might vary with fashions, education sticks with the standards of the age. A course reference book may well help our cause.  +++$+++ :Actually, you may be able to help! Do you have any siblings who are doing, or have recently done, English Language GCSE? Or any of your fellow students. Can you find any decent course books which show how proper nouns are dealt with? Whilst style might vary with fashions, education sticks with the standards of the age. A course reference book may well help our cause. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 23:17, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

440426 +++$+++ Sadi Carnot +++$+++ Scm83x +++$+++ 440426 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-05 07:40:00 +++$+++ 1.170690000E09 +++$+++ Scm, I see that you have casually reverted the image of thermodynamic engine for that of a candle in the [[Template:Thermodynamics timeline context]] box?  I don't exactly know what your motive is?  A candle has nothing to do with thermodynamics.  I have many history of thermodynamic books.  Moreover, I've never seen you edit any [[thermodynamics]]-related articles.  Please explain yourself?  -- +++$+++ Scm, I see that you have casually reverted the image of thermodynamic engine for that of a candle in the [[Template:Thermodynamics timeline context]] box?  I don't exactly know what your motive is?  A candle has nothing to do with thermodynamics.  I have many history of thermodynamic books.  Moreover, I've never seen you edit any [[thermodynamics]]-related articles.  Please explain yourself?  --[[User:Sadi Carnot|Sadi Carnot]] 07:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
440427 +++$+++ Scm83x +++$+++ Scm83x +++$+++ 440426 +++$+++ 440426 +++$+++ 2007-02-05 07:52:00 +++$+++ 1.170690720E09 +++$+++ Candle = fire = heat = thermodynamics... I'm not sure how much more obvious that can be.  But that aside, a moving image in a box such as that only serves to distract from the content of the article.  Also, I am a mechanical engineer with a particular interest in thermal fluids.  It really isn't wise to assume that because I don't edit thermodynamics articles that I am ignorant of the subject.  If I work with thermal fluids all day, what reason do I have to come home and do the same in my free time? &mdash;  +++$+++ :Candle = fire = heat = thermodynamics... I'm not sure how much more obvious that can be.  But that aside, a moving image in a box such as that only serves to distract from the content of the article.  Also, I am a mechanical engineer with a particular interest in thermal fluids.  It really isn't wise to assume that because I don't edit thermodynamics articles that I am ignorant of the subject.  If I work with thermal fluids all day, what reason do I have to come home and do the same in my free time? &mdash; [[User:Scm83x|Scm83x]] <sup>[[User talk:Scm83x|hook 'em]]</sup> 07:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

545406 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545406 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-03 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.217817840E09 +++$+++ What is the point of question 8 to Mr. IP? <span style=\"font-family: verdana;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ What is the point of question 8 to Mr. IP? <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 19:44, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
545407 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545406 +++$+++ 545406 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.217818200E09 +++$+++ Answer: the Colts suck because they're not Mares.   +++$+++ : Answer: the Colts suck because they're not Mares.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
545408 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545406 +++$+++ 545407 +++$+++ 2008-08-03 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.217819940E09 +++$+++ And that has what to do with an RFA?<span style=\"font-family: verdana;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::And that has what to do with an RFA?<span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 20:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

21121 +++$+++ Cannibaloki +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21121 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-03 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.223039340E09 +++$+++ Where is the reference for <span class=\"plainlinks\">[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Opeth_discography&curid=13191348&diff=242681636&oldid=235823865 this]<\/span>? <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ Where is the reference for <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Opeth_discography&curid=13191348&diff=242681636&oldid=235823865 this]</span>? <font face="Impact">[[User:Cannibaloki|<font color="darkred">Canniba</font>]][[User talk:Cannibaloki|<font color="darkred">loki</font>]]</font> 06:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
21122 +++$+++ Cannibaloki +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21121 +++$+++ 21121 +++$+++ 2008-10-03 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.223040660E09 +++$+++ <span class=\"plainlinks\">[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Opeth_discography#cite_note-16 Amen]<\/span>. =P <font face=\"Impact\"> +++$+++ :<span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opeth_discography#cite_note-16 Amen]</span>. =P <font face="Impact">[[User:Cannibaloki|<font color="darkred">Canniba</font>]][[User talk:Cannibaloki|<font color="darkred">loki</font>]]</font> 06:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

21123 +++$+++ IbLeo +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21123 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-30 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.225378200E09 +++$+++ Hi. [[User:JD554|JD554]] suggested me over [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rock music#Sourcing of Australian chart positions in Sweet discography|here]] that you might be in possession of the \"Australian Chart Book 1970 - 1992\" and thus help me finding a more established source over at [[Talk:Sweet discography#Sourcing the Australian Chart positions]]. Your input would be highly appreciated. Cheers. \u2013  +++$+++ Hi. [[User:JD554|JD554]] suggested me over [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rock music#Sourcing of Australian chart positions in Sweet discography|here]] that you might be in possession of the "Australian Chart Book 1970 - 1992" and thus help me finding a more established source over at [[Talk:Sweet discography#Sourcing the Australian Chart positions]]. Your input would be highly appreciated. Cheers. – [[User:IbLeo|IbLeo]] ([[User talk:IbLeo|talk]]) 07:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
21124 +++$+++ IbLeo +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21123 +++$+++ 21123 +++$+++ 2008-10-30 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.225412880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the hint. I put in a request on australian-charts.com's forum. Cheers. \u2013  +++$+++ :Thanks for the hint. I put in a request on australian-charts.com's forum. Cheers. – [[User:IbLeo|IbLeo]] ([[User talk:IbLeo|talk]]) 17:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

283268 +++$+++ ColinFine +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283268 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-18 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.171870080E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] 23:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
283269 +++$+++ ColinFine +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283268 +++$+++ 283268 +++$+++ 2007-02-20 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.172018700E09 +++$+++ You didn't answer my question about 'druggist' - was it a contemporary term (or has it entered UK English while I wasn't looking?) To my mind it's American for 'pharmacist' or (more colloquially) 'chemist'. -- +++$+++ :You didn't answer my question about 'druggist' - was it a contemporary term (or has it entered UK English while I wasn't looking?) To my mind it's American for 'pharmacist' or (more colloquially) 'chemist'. --[[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] 16:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

21126 +++$+++ JD554 +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-30 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.238438160E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've noticed that you have added some more Australian chart positions and have cited ''Australian Chart Books 1940-2005''. Is this more than one book? If so, can you specifically add which one covers which chart positions. It would also be useful if you could add the publisher, publisher's location and ISBN(s) to the reference as well. Is there a specific reason for the note in the reference about pre-1989 information? -- +++$+++ Hi, I've noticed that you have added some more Australian chart positions and have cited ''Australian Chart Books 1940-2005''. Is this more than one book? If so, can you specifically add which one covers which chart positions. It would also be useful if you could add the publisher, publisher's location and ISBN(s) to the reference as well. Is there a specific reason for the note in the reference about pre-1989 information? --[[User:JD554|JD554]] ([[User talk:JD554|talk]]) 11:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
21127 +++$+++ JD554 +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21126 +++$+++ 21126 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 11:50:00 +++$+++ 1.238439000E09 +++$+++ In that case, I don't think the note is necessary. The link at the top of the columns is to [[ARIA Charts]] where it mentions about the Kent Music Report. Thanks for the help in getting the rest of the information for the reference, -- +++$+++ :In that case, I don't think the note is necessary. The link at the top of the columns is to [[ARIA Charts]] where it mentions about the Kent Music Report. Thanks for the help in getting the rest of the information for the reference, --[[User:JD554|JD554]] ([[User talk:JD554|talk]]) 11:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

283271 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-21 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.172107320E09 +++$+++ Joe, you are an 'effin genius. I had no idea how to do that (and I bleedin' tried). The pork scratchings are on me.  +++$+++ Joe, you are an 'effin genius. I had no idea how to do that (and I bleedin' tried). The pork scratchings are on me. [[User:Andreasegde|ThE bEaTLeS aka andreasegde]] 17:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
283272 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283271 +++$+++ 283271 +++$+++ 2007-02-26 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.172540760E09 +++$+++ \"Despite going everywhere with The Beatles, and showing their devotion by carrying out whatever demeaning errands The Beatles wanted to be done, Evans and Aspinall were sometimes reminded that they would never totally be a part of the group. One sarcastic look, or an unkind word from one of The Beatles would make them realise what their position really was.\"  +++$+++ :"Despite going everywhere with The Beatles, and showing their devotion by carrying out whatever demeaning errands The Beatles wanted to be done, Evans and Aspinall were sometimes reminded that they would never totally be a part of the group. One sarcastic look, or an unkind word from one of The Beatles would make them realise what their position really was." [[User:Andreasegde|ThE bEaTLeS aka andreasegde]] 17:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

309356 +++$+++ Aa77zz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-09 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.252532160E09 +++$+++ Dave, Just to let you know that I've deleted a bunch of references from [[Reaction to Darwin's theory]] that you added in July 2007. I've removed many of the uncited references including some early Darwin publications - we are unlikely to need them in the article. I've started adding inline citations to direct quotes - all except one were from the Darwin Correspondence Project. As always, there is more to do...    +++$+++ Dave, Just to let you know that I've deleted a bunch of references from [[Reaction to Darwin's theory]] that you added in July 2007. I've removed many of the uncited references including some early Darwin publications - we are unlikely to need them in the article. I've started adding inline citations to direct quotes - all except one were from the Darwin Correspondence Project. As always, there is more to do...   [[User:Aa77zz|Aa77zz]] ([[User talk:Aa77zz|talk]]) 14:36, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
309357 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309356 +++$+++ 309356 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.252545720E09 +++$+++ Thanks very much, these were \"in case\" references duplicated from [[Charles Darwin]] which didn't get taken further, your tidying up and finding new references is great work. Back then I was copying cites out of D & M's biography as they didn't seem to be available online, things have changed greatly! Am presently trying to work on a couple of other articles, it's good to see progress being made on that one. By the way, do you think we should consider moving it to another title? It's very much concerned with Darwin's life in the first year after publication of the ''Origin''. Perhaps there's a case for expanding [[On the Origin of Species#Reception]] into a main article which could maybe be called [[impact of Darwin's theory]] and cover the long term impact as well as the immediate reaction. However, guess that would overlap with [[history of evolutionary thought]]. Plenty other projects to resolve first! . .  +++$+++ :Thanks very much, these were "in case" references duplicated from [[Charles Darwin]] which didn't get taken further, your tidying up and finding new references is great work. Back then I was copying cites out of D & M's biography as they didn't seem to be available online, things have changed greatly! Am presently trying to work on a couple of other articles, it's good to see progress being made on that one. By the way, do you think we should consider moving it to another title? It's very much concerned with Darwin's life in the first year after publication of the ''Origin''. Perhaps there's a case for expanding [[On the Origin of Species#Reception]] into a main article which could maybe be called [[impact of Darwin's theory]] and cover the long term impact as well as the immediate reaction. However, guess that would overlap with [[history of evolutionary thought]]. Plenty other projects to resolve first! . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
309358 +++$+++ Aa77zz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309356 +++$+++ 309357 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.253047200E09 +++$+++ When a publication is only cited once, I prefer to include the publication in the References (ie cited publications) and use the Harv template in the text rather than having a hybrid system with some publications in the Notes section and others in the Reference section. I've chosen not to include access dates for urls pointing to published sources. There has been a lengthy [[Wikipedia_talk:Citing_sources#Retrieval_dates:_redundant_for_sources_with_official_publication_dates.3F | discussion]] on this issue and there may even be a consensus. We are in a special position in having so much of the primary literature available online. +++$+++ ::When a publication is only cited once, I prefer to include the publication in the References (ie cited publications) and use the Harv template in the text rather than having a hybrid system with some publications in the Notes section and others in the Reference section. I've chosen not to include access dates for urls pointing to published sources. There has been a lengthy [[Wikipedia_talk:Citing_sources#Retrieval_dates:_redundant_for_sources_with_official_publication_dates.3F | discussion]] on this issue and there may even be a consensus. We are in a special position in having so much of the primary literature available online.[[User:Aa77zz|Aa77zz]] ([[User talk:Aa77zz|talk]]) 13:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
309359 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309356 +++$+++ 309358 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.253060820E09 +++$+++ Good work with organising the references. Think we should remove \"retrieved\" dates from the remaining letters and references? It's been one of these chores adding them, and I agree that they're probably a bit unnecessary in cases where works are published. The only problem might be when an error in transcribing the original gets corrected on the site we're using. Thanks again, .  +++$+++ :::Good work with organising the references. Think we should remove "retrieved" dates from the remaining letters and references? It's been one of these chores adding them, and I agree that they're probably a bit unnecessary in cases where works are published. The only problem might be when an error in transcribing the original gets corrected on the site we're using. Thanks again, . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

283276 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-03 15:45:00 +++$+++ 1.172965500E09 +++$+++ Have a look at [[Mal Evans]] (who is now GA) and read about who co-wrote [[Fixing a Hole]] and the [[Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (song)|Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band]] song. It will give you goosebumps, and put hairs on yer scrawny chest, r'kid... :))  +++$+++ Have a look at [[Mal Evans]] (who is now GA) and read about who co-wrote [[Fixing a Hole]] and the [[Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (song)|Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band]] song. It will give you goosebumps, and put hairs on yer scrawny chest, r'kid... :)) [[User:Andreasegde|ThE bEaTLeS aka andreasegde]] 15:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
283277 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283276 +++$+++ 283276 +++$+++ 2007-03-06 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.173232200E09 +++$+++ You silly young twonk - face-first into a brick wall? How did the wall feel about it?  +++$+++ :You silly young twonk - face-first into a brick wall? How did the wall feel about it? [[User:Andreasegde|ThE bEaTLeS aka andreasegde]] 17:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
283278 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283276 +++$+++ 283277 +++$+++ 2007-03-08 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.173382020E09 +++$+++ Good news. Look after yer crust, bonce, noggin, loaf, that bit between yer ears, skull and head.  +++$+++ ::Good news. Look after yer crust, bonce, noggin, loaf, that bit between yer ears, skull and head. [[User:Andreasegde|ThE bEaTLeS aka andreasegde]] 11:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
283279 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283276 +++$+++ 283278 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.173430080E09 +++$+++ You great bell end! Thanks for the kind words Joe, I'm OK now, funny thing that, I really like that song, in fact I like a lot of thier stuff, and thier attitude! Cheers La,  +++$+++ :::You great bell end! Thanks for the kind words Joe, I'm OK now, funny thing that, I really like that song, in fact I like a lot of thier stuff, and thier attitude! Cheers La, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 00:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
283280 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283276 +++$+++ 283279 +++$+++ 2007-03-09 13:11:00 +++$+++ 1.173474660E09 +++$+++ Good, I'm pleased to hear that, next time walk into a Manc, and do us all a favour! Cheers Joe!  +++$+++ ::::Good, I'm pleased to hear that, next time walk into a Manc, and do us all a favour! Cheers Joe! [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 13:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

545421 +++$+++ Mmyotis +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-09 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.218336180E09 +++$+++ Perhaps this reference would help bolster your position. [http:\/\/www.acsh.org\/healthissues\/newsID.901\/healthissue_detail.asp]  +++$+++ Perhaps this reference would help bolster your position. [http://www.acsh.org/healthissues/newsID.901/healthissue_detail.asp] [[User:Mmyotis|<font color="#FF6600">'''Mmyotis'''</font>]] [[User_Talk:Mmyotis|<font color="#000000"><sup><small>'''(^^o^^)'''</small></sup></font>]] 19:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
545422 +++$+++ ImperfectlyInformed +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545421 +++$+++ 545421 +++$+++ 2008-08-09 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.218337260E09 +++$+++ That source has a reputation as an [http:\/\/sourcewatch.org\/index.php?title=American_Council_on_Science_and_Health industry front group]. Columns on organization websites (outside of the gov't) in general are not really \"published\" enough to cover BLP concerns in my mind, and that's an organization with an especially bad reputation. OM is not a pseudoscience per se, especially now that vitamin C is being studied again for cancer with interesting results.[http:\/\/www.livescience.com\/health\/618140.html] There's also a trial on the schizophrenia thing going on. These are happening because there are recognized flaws in the 60s literature.  +++$+++ :That source has a reputation as an [http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=American_Council_on_Science_and_Health industry front group]. Columns on organization websites (outside of the gov't) in general are not really "published" enough to cover BLP concerns in my mind, and that's an organization with an especially bad reputation. OM is not a pseudoscience per se, especially now that vitamin C is being studied again for cancer with interesting results.[http://www.livescience.com/health/618140.html] There's also a trial on the schizophrenia thing going on. These are happening because there are recognized flaws in the 60s literature. [[User:ImperfectlyInformed|<span style="font-family: Times">II</span>]] | ([[User_talk:ImperfectlyInformed|t]] - [[Special:Contributions/ImperfectlyInformed|c]]) 20:01, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
545423 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545421 +++$+++ 545422 +++$+++ 2008-08-09 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.218340920E09 +++$+++ Pushing science is always a good thing, even if the group gets funding from Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Johnson and Johnson et al.  The pharmaceutical companies, despite their warts (and they have more warts than a good sized ogre), invest more in basic scientific and medical research than any government could ever imagine.  They might be looking for the almighty dollar in the next statin that drops cholesterol by 0.0001%, but they brought statins to the market, which reduces cardiovascular disease significantly.  And your reference for Vitamin C is laughable.  Levine clearly states that the the results are a long way from \"prime time.\"  Do you know how many things in science are tried and failed?  I follow baseball closely, wait, the metaphor will make sense, and every team claims they have the next [[Sandy Koufax|Koufax]] or [[Babe Ruth|Ruth]], but oftentimes, they have me (in other words, totally incapable of throwing a curveball or hitting one).  Vitamin C might work, might not.  We're 20 years away from any clinical proof that it does in any manner that is safe and efficacious.  But read carefully, Levine states that it has to be delivered intravenously, meaning don't go down to your local GNC to scarf 2000 kg of Vitamin C.  Or don't buy orange juice futures.  :D   +++$+++ ::Pushing science is always a good thing, even if the group gets funding from Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Johnson and Johnson et al.  The pharmaceutical companies, despite their warts (and they have more warts than a good sized ogre), invest more in basic scientific and medical research than any government could ever imagine.  They might be looking for the almighty dollar in the next statin that drops cholesterol by 0.0001%, but they brought statins to the market, which reduces cardiovascular disease significantly.  And your reference for Vitamin C is laughable.  Levine clearly states that the the results are a long way from "prime time."  Do you know how many things in science are tried and failed?  I follow baseball closely, wait, the metaphor will make sense, and every team claims they have the next [[Sandy Koufax|Koufax]] or [[Babe Ruth|Ruth]], but oftentimes, they have me (in other words, totally incapable of throwing a curveball or hitting one).  Vitamin C might work, might not.  We're 20 years away from any clinical proof that it does in any manner that is safe and efficacious.  But read carefully, Levine states that it has to be delivered intravenously, meaning don't go down to your local GNC to scarf 2000 kg of Vitamin C.  Or don't buy orange juice futures.  :D  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 21:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
545424 +++$+++ ImperfectlyInformed +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545421 +++$+++ 545421 +++$+++ 2008-08-09 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.218346740E09 +++$+++ Here's what I ask: if you want to claim that OMM is a pseudoscience, you need a good reference which discusses, at length, how OMM falls into the criterion of pseudoscience. It should reference the studies which have been done on orthomolecular medicine's claims. The paper you referenced (unpublished) does not do that. The most scholarly, referenced source on the subject is Melascino (sp), which I'd suggest you check out. Marlin, intravenous has been the preferred administration method in orthomolecular medicine for a long time.  +++$+++ :Here's what I ask: if you want to claim that OMM is a pseudoscience, you need a good reference which discusses, at length, how OMM falls into the criterion of pseudoscience. It should reference the studies which have been done on orthomolecular medicine's claims. The paper you referenced (unpublished) does not do that. The most scholarly, referenced source on the subject is Melascino (sp), which I'd suggest you check out. Marlin, intravenous has been the preferred administration method in orthomolecular medicine for a long time. [[User:ImperfectlyInformed|<span style="font-family: Times">II</span>]] | ([[User_talk:ImperfectlyInformed|t]] - [[Special:Contributions/ImperfectlyInformed|c]]) 22:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
545425 +++$+++ Mmyotis +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545421 +++$+++ 545424 +++$+++ 2008-08-10 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.218355260E09 +++$+++ OMM proponents take legitimate studies and reinterpret them unscientifically to satisfy their claims. That's what makes them pseudoscience. There are no reliable OMM studies because OMM is not recognized by mainstream research laboratories as a legitimate field of inquiry. What there are are people who document practices and claims that constitute pseudoscience. These are the good references that document that OM falls into the criterion of pseudoscience. And the number and quality of references identifying OMM as pseudoscience is more than adequate to justify inclusion of the infobox.  +++$+++ ::OMM proponents take legitimate studies and reinterpret them unscientifically to satisfy their claims. That's what makes them pseudoscience. There are no reliable OMM studies because OMM is not recognized by mainstream research laboratories as a legitimate field of inquiry. What there are are people who document practices and claims that constitute pseudoscience. These are the good references that document that OM falls into the criterion of pseudoscience. And the number and quality of references identifying OMM as pseudoscience is more than adequate to justify inclusion of the infobox. [[User:Mmyotis|<font color="#FF6600">'''Mmyotis'''</font>]] [[User_Talk:Mmyotis|<font color="#000000"><sup><small>'''(^^o^^)'''</small></sup></font>]] 01:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
545426 +++$+++ Orangemarlin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545421 +++$+++ 545425 +++$+++ 2008-08-10 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.218359280E09 +++$+++ [[User:Orangemarlin|OM]] is pseudoscience?  :)  I happen to agree with II.  If there's no verification of OMM being pseudoscience, then we can't [[WP:SYNTH|invent]] it.   +++$+++ :::[[User:Orangemarlin|OM]] is pseudoscience?  :)  I happen to agree with II.  If there's no verification of OMM being pseudoscience, then we can't [[WP:SYNTH|invent]] it.  [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 02:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
545427 +++$+++ Mmyotis +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545421 +++$+++ 545426 +++$+++ 2008-08-10 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.218360840E09 +++$+++ Since one cannot logically perform studies to verify that any particular field is either a science or a pseudoscience, that seems a rather absurd criterium. But perhaps I don't understand what you mean. What would you require as adequate verification? I would argue that your answer, if it is reasonable and legitimate, must also be adequate for verifying that a particular field is a science. Perhaps we should continue this discussion in the infobox section of the OMM talk page where it originated.  +++$+++ ::::Since one cannot logically perform studies to verify that any particular field is either a science or a pseudoscience, that seems a rather absurd criterium. But perhaps I don't understand what you mean. What would you require as adequate verification? I would argue that your answer, if it is reasonable and legitimate, must also be adequate for verifying that a particular field is a science. Perhaps we should continue this discussion in the infobox section of the OMM talk page where it originated. [[User:Mmyotis|<font color="#FF6600">'''Mmyotis'''</font>]] [[User_Talk:Mmyotis|<font color="#000000"><sup><small>'''(^^o^^)'''</small></sup></font>]] 02:34, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
545428 +++$+++ ImperfectlyInformed +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545421 +++$+++ 545427 +++$+++ 2008-08-10 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.218418020E09 +++$+++ The self-published paper used by TimVickers (which uses the word orthomolecular a scant one time, and devotes only a few sentences to the topic, no references) discusses the basic criterions of a pseudoscience. The two major ones are: 1) scientific implausibility and 2) lack of testability\/falsifiability. Orthomolecular medicine is uncertain on both counts. Nutrients, broadly termed, to treat certain diseases is not implausible, especially since they are used for certain rare genetic conditions, and since certain ones do have a demonstrable effect on hormones. Most of the OMM's treatments haven't been tested in 30 years, and the criticisms on the tests from Pauling and others have been ignored. Does anyone mind if I move this discussion over to orthomolecular medicine?  +++$+++ :::::The self-published paper used by TimVickers (which uses the word orthomolecular a scant one time, and devotes only a few sentences to the topic, no references) discusses the basic criterions of a pseudoscience. The two major ones are: 1) scientific implausibility and 2) lack of testability/falsifiability. Orthomolecular medicine is uncertain on both counts. Nutrients, broadly termed, to treat certain diseases is not implausible, especially since they are used for certain rare genetic conditions, and since certain ones do have a demonstrable effect on hormones. Most of the OMM's treatments haven't been tested in 30 years, and the criticisms on the tests from Pauling and others have been ignored. Does anyone mind if I move this discussion over to orthomolecular medicine? [[User:ImperfectlyInformed|<span style="font-family: Times">II</span>]] | ([[User_talk:ImperfectlyInformed|t]] - [[Special:Contributions/ImperfectlyInformed|c]]) 18:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

21136 +++$+++ 12345abcxyz20082009 +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21136 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-15 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.258305300E09 +++$+++ Hello. Where did you get [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lily_Allen_discography&action=historysubmit&diff=325933096&oldid=325826722 this] from? I searched ARIA official website, aCharts, australian-charts... nothing about this song. Where did you get this peak from?-- +++$+++ Hello. Where did you get [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lily_Allen_discography&action=historysubmit&diff=325933096&oldid=325826722 this] from? I searched ARIA official website, aCharts, australian-charts... nothing about this song. Where did you get this peak from?--[[User:12345abcxyz20082009|<font color="black">12345abcxyz20082009</font>]] ([[User talk:12345abcxyz20082009|<font color="black">talk</font>]]) 09:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
21137 +++$+++ 12345abcxyz20082009 +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21136 +++$+++ 21136 +++$+++ 2009-11-15 09:37:00 +++$+++ 1.258306620E09 +++$+++ Oh, fine then. I'll leave it, as the sites should update their peaks today. -- +++$+++ :Oh, fine then. I'll leave it, as the sites should update their peaks today. --[[User:12345abcxyz20082009|<font color="black">12345abcxyz20082009</font>]] ([[User talk:12345abcxyz20082009|<font color="black">talk</font>]]) 09:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

283281 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283281 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.173576720E09 +++$+++ A reporter asked the overweight kid that has been in the news recently what his favourite musical instrument in school was. He replied, \"The dinner bell!\"   +++$+++ A reporter asked the overweight kid that has been in the news recently what his favourite musical instrument in school was. He replied, "The dinner bell!"  [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 17:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
283282 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283281 +++$+++ 283281 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.173740880E09 +++$+++ Why are you not in it? Or are you? C'mon Cresty baby, spill the beans...  +++$+++ :Why are you not in it? Or are you? C'mon Cresty baby, spill the beans... [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 16:08, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
283283 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283281 +++$+++ 283282 +++$+++ 2007-03-13 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.173832980E09 +++$+++ Well if it is you, then you've got a half-decent voice. Your guitar work is a bit shaky. (That's me talking like I know what I'm talking about - but I do.) How strange it is to see Crestville in the flesh, though. I'll have to watch it again.  +++$+++ ::Well if it is you, then you've got a half-decent voice. Your guitar work is a bit shaky. (That's me talking like I know what I'm talking about - but I do.) How strange it is to see Crestville in the flesh, though. I'll have to watch it again. [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 17:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
283284 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283281 +++$+++ 283283 +++$+++ 2007-03-14 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.173934020E09 +++$+++ Uhh-err missus, I did (but in sausage-land.) I played your video to me bird today, and she spotted you straight away. Why was it the last \"gig\" anyway?  +++$+++ :::Uhh-err missus, I did (but in sausage-land.) I played your video to me bird today, and she spotted you straight away. Why was it the last "gig" anyway? [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 21:47, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

545429 +++$+++ Mathsci +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545429 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-10 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.218361560E09 +++$+++ However, he used two primary sources (letters fully reproduced in a book without commentary) in preparing his comment. So what he wrote counts as [[WP:OR]]. He seems to be gaming the system. I have cleaned up the article, with three new references, in a properly encyclopedic way. I wonder whether you could give him a warning for disruptive behaviour, because he seems to have some problems as to what the purpose of this encyclopedia is. It is not here for him to prove a [[WP:POINT]] by capricious edits, because that is simply disruption, for which he could be blocked. Many thanks,  +++$+++ However, he used two primary sources (letters fully reproduced in a book without commentary) in preparing his comment. So what he wrote counts as [[WP:OR]]. He seems to be gaming the system. I have cleaned up the article, with three new references, in a properly encyclopedic way. I wonder whether you could give him a warning for disruptive behaviour, because he seems to have some problems as to what the purpose of this encyclopedia is. It is not here for him to prove a [[WP:POINT]] by capricious edits, because that is simply disruption, for which he could be blocked. Many thanks, [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 02:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
545430 +++$+++ Phlegm Rooster +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545429 +++$+++ 545429 +++$+++ 2008-08-10 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.218369780E09 +++$+++ I have responded over on the talk page of the article in question. The book has plenty of commentary in the pages just before the letters.  +++$+++ *I have responded over on the talk page of the article in question. The book has plenty of commentary in the pages just before the letters. [[User:Phlegm Rooster|Phlegm Rooster]] ([[User talk:Phlegm Rooster|talk]]) 05:03, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
545431 +++$+++ Mathsci +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545429 +++$+++ 545430 +++$+++ 2008-08-10 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.218436200E09 +++$+++ This editor is continuing to add an unbalanced account of the history of the MAA to make a [[WP:POINT]]. He is attempting to add controversy into the article for some reason best known to himself. I have no time to waste on undergraduate antics, so others can deal with him.  +++$+++ ::This editor is continuing to add an unbalanced account of the history of the MAA to make a [[WP:POINT]]. He is attempting to add controversy into the article for some reason best known to himself. I have no time to waste on undergraduate antics, so others can deal with him. [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 23:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

283286 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283286 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-17 05:02:00 +++$+++ 1.174132920E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Andreasegde#On_the_Beatles That] was fuckin' beautiful.  <strong> +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Andreasegde#On_the_Beatles That] was fuckin' beautiful.  <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small> [[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 05:02, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
283287 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283286 +++$+++ 283286 +++$+++ 2007-03-17 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.174173780E09 +++$+++ Aye, the Mighty Crestville is a dab hand at being succint (or is it sucking sinks?) He also knows a thing or two about Yachts (or Yots) even though he does not own one. More power to his right, or left elbow, depending on his left or right-handedness, M'lud.  +++$+++ :Aye, the Mighty Crestville is a dab hand at being succint (or is it sucking sinks?) He also knows a thing or two about Yachts (or Yots) even though he does not own one. More power to his right, or left elbow, depending on his left or right-handedness, M'lud. [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 16:23, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

21143 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21143 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.289950500E09 +++$+++ It's not personal preference, though. It's English grammar. Even though, people make it personal preference when they add it. To make sure, I Google'd it and the sentence comes first with the punctuation in, then you add the speech marks after. It's got nothing to do with if the page is readable either way. Just thought I'd clear this up. And oh, I didn't know other Mimi pages were like it, I'm not a frequent music editor any more, it's too much work for me to go through all her pages and sort it. Plus I'm semi-retired now. PS. Consistency only matters in an article, not every article by an artist.  +++$+++ It's not personal preference, though. It's English grammar. Even though, people make it personal preference when they add it. To make sure, I Google'd it and the sentence comes first with the punctuation in, then you add the speech marks after. It's got nothing to do with if the page is readable either way. Just thought I'd clear this up. And oh, I didn't know other Mimi pages were like it, I'm not a frequent music editor any more, it's too much work for me to go through all her pages and sort it. Plus I'm semi-retired now. PS. Consistency only matters in an article, not every article by an artist. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 15:35, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
21144 +++$+++ Jayy008 +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21143 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.289951340E09 +++$+++ I didn't know all of that. In any case, some of those on the page still need the punctuation inside. But if you want to revert my edit, I will not challenge it again.  +++$+++ ::I didn't know all of that. In any case, some of those on the page still need the punctuation inside. But if you want to revert my edit, I will not challenge it again. [[User:Jayy008|Jayy008]] ([[User talk:Jayy008|talk]]) 15:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

283288 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-29 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.175206560E09 +++$+++ Anyway, I hope you're well we've been very busy, this is the first time I've been o line for almost a week! Cheers Joe, all the best,  +++$+++ Anyway, I hope you're well we've been very busy, this is the first time I've been o line for almost a week! Cheers Joe, all the best, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 15:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
283289 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283288 +++$+++ 283288 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.175206980E09 +++$+++ Oh Shit! Just seen his page doesn't look to good.  +++$+++ :Oh Shit! Just seen his page doesn't look to good. [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 15:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
283290 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283288 +++$+++ 283289 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.175209200E09 +++$+++ I know what you mean, I can be very emotional, (for someone who is highly disciplined at work) it's all the mad Irish blood coursing through me Scouse veins! Yeah, I've seen Let It Be, it gives a real insight into the breakup, the way George is dissmised by Paul & John is quite painful to watch. Cheers La,  +++$+++ ::I know what you mean, I can be very emotional, (for someone who is highly disciplined at work) it's all the mad Irish blood coursing through me Scouse veins! Yeah, I've seen Let It Be, it gives a real insight into the breakup, the way George is dissmised by Paul & John is quite painful to watch. Cheers La, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 16:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
283291 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283288 +++$+++ 283290 +++$+++ 2007-03-29 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.175209800E09 +++$+++ Fair points on both counts Joe.  +++$+++ :::Fair points on both counts Joe. [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 16:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
283292 +++$+++ Lukobe +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283288 +++$+++ 283288 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.175256660E09 +++$+++ Nobody forced Andrea to leave, just like nobody forced me to leave. -- +++$+++ :Nobody forced Andrea to leave, just like nobody forced me to leave. --[[User:Lukobe|Lukobe]] 05:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
283293 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283288 +++$+++ 283292 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.175268240E09 +++$+++ Oh m goodness, they're dropping like flies! I feel I should pay some tribute to you all, it'll be lonely without you two, but I won't. Never mind.-- +++$+++ ::Oh m goodness, they're dropping like flies! I feel I should pay some tribute to you all, it'll be lonely without you two, but I won't. Never mind.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 08:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

545434 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-14 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.218697920E09 +++$+++ Are you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Autism&diff=prev&oldid=231792421 going American on us?]   +++$+++ Are you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Autism&diff=prev&oldid=231792421 going American on us?]  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
545435 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545434 +++$+++ 545434 +++$+++ 2008-08-14 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.218700200E09 +++$+++ I dunno, know what I mean?   +++$+++ : I dunno, know what I mean?  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 00:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

21149 +++$+++ Adabow +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-15 09:21:00 +++$+++ 1.305476460E09 +++$+++ Please read [[WP:NOTBROKEN]]. Thanks and happy editing!  +++$+++ Please read [[WP:NOTBROKEN]]. Thanks and happy editing! [[User:Adabow|Adabow]] ([[User talk:Adabow|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Adabow|contribs]]) 09:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
21150 +++$+++ Adabow +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21149 +++$+++ 21149 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 09:35:00 +++$+++ 1.305477300E09 +++$+++ Well, it's actually 11 characters more, but the main reason for not redirecting is that one day someone might create the [[Australian Singles Chart]] article. Inevitably, we will want all of these occurences to point to this article, and it will be a hughe pain in the backside to fix all of these wrong links.  +++$+++ :Well, it's actually 11 characters more, but the main reason for not redirecting is that one day someone might create the [[Australian Singles Chart]] article. Inevitably, we will want all of these occurences to point to this article, and it will be a hughe pain in the backside to fix all of these wrong links. [[User:Adabow|Adabow]] ([[User talk:Adabow|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Adabow|contribs]]) 09:35, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
21151 +++$+++ Adabow +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21149 +++$+++ 21150 +++$+++ 2011-05-15 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.305477900E09 +++$+++ Even if someone created the [[ARIA Singles Chart]] article, we would want [[Australian Singles Chart]] to be redirected there. And I don't think bots can recognize things as complicated as that.  +++$+++ ::Even if someone created the [[ARIA Singles Chart]] article, we would want [[Australian Singles Chart]] to be redirected there. And I don't think bots can recognize things as complicated as that. [[User:Adabow|Adabow]] ([[User talk:Adabow|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Adabow|contribs]]) 09:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

283294 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-30 12:23:00 +++$+++ 1.175282580E09 +++$+++ (undent) I'm still around, doing a little on Beatles articles as and when, and editing other stuff and bugging a whole different bunch of editors elsewhere. I'm not coming back to the Project just yet, since I am pretty much part of the problem there and I would look like a right cunt if I came merrily waltzing back now that some major contributors - a couple of whom I disagreed with in the amending and application of policy - have also left. Since you, Joe, seem to be the only one now left I think I will make my final statement on this whole sorry mess here; Andreasedge, and V,C & D, John Cardinal and Lukobe were\/are excellent editors who contributed great stuff to The Beatles Project. Andrew in particular really sorted out some articles. I enjoyed interacting with them in the most part, and think their loss is a loss to Wikipedia. I'm sorry things couldn't be sorted out.  +++$+++ (undent) I'm still around, doing a little on Beatles articles as and when, and editing other stuff and bugging a whole different bunch of editors elsewhere. I'm not coming back to the Project just yet, since I am pretty much part of the problem there and I would look like a right cunt if I came merrily waltzing back now that some major contributors - a couple of whom I disagreed with in the amending and application of policy - have also left. Since you, Joe, seem to be the only one now left I think I will make my final statement on this whole sorry mess here; Andreasedge, and V,C & D, John Cardinal and Lukobe were/are excellent editors who contributed great stuff to The Beatles Project. Andrew in particular really sorted out some articles. I enjoyed interacting with them in the most part, and think their loss is a loss to Wikipedia. I'm sorry things couldn't be sorted out. [[User:LessHeard vanU|Mark]] 12:23, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
283295 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283294 +++$+++ 283294 +++$+++ 2007-03-30 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.175310480E09 +++$+++ Oh, I'm always partial to some silliness... I've had to live with myself for most of my life!  +++$+++ :Oh, I'm always partial to some silliness... I've had to live with myself for most of my life! [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 20:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
283296 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283294 +++$+++ 283295 +++$+++ 2007-03-31 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.175338980E09 +++$+++ Can someone fill me in, or at least give me what we used to call the Reader's Digest Condensed version? Tell me this is not all about a T.  Email off-system is fine, if you prefer.  +++$+++ ::Can someone fill me in, or at least give me what we used to call the Reader's Digest Condensed version? Tell me this is not all about a T.  Email off-system is fine, if you prefer. [[User talk:Tvoz|Not All Yanks]] 04:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
283297 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283294 +++$+++ 283296 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.175596500E09 +++$+++ I did, kind of - emailed him. No response, so I hope he got it. I hope it blows over. Or else I;ll have to go kill some children (which si what80 % of them are). <strong> +++$+++ :::I did, kind of - emailed him. No response, so I hope he got it. I hope it blows over. Or else I;ll have to go kill some children (which si what80 % of them are). <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 03:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

545439 +++$+++ ScienceApologist +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-14 19:28:00 +++$+++ 1.218767280E09 +++$+++ Yes, certainly by the measure of the existence of atoms and molecules, orthomolecular medicine is more plausible. My issue, though, is that there is no evidence that orthomolecular medicine is any more ''effective'' than magic water memory. What's worse, orthomolecular medicine has the potential to be much more harmful than homeopathy, for example. People can die of vitamin overdoses, for example.  +++$+++ Yes, certainly by the measure of the existence of atoms and molecules, orthomolecular medicine is more plausible. My issue, though, is that there is no evidence that orthomolecular medicine is any more ''effective'' than magic water memory. What's worse, orthomolecular medicine has the potential to be much more harmful than homeopathy, for example. People can die of vitamin overdoses, for example. [[User:ScienceApologist|ScienceApologist]] ([[User talk:ScienceApologist|talk]]) 19:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
545440 +++$+++ Alterrabe +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545439 +++$+++ 545439 +++$+++ 2008-08-14 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.218767400E09 +++$+++ People can, and actually do, drown in their bathtub.  Surely you are not against bathing!-- +++$+++ :People can, and actually do, drown in their bathtub.  Surely you are not against bathing!--[[User:Alterrabe|Alterrabe]] ([[User talk:Alterrabe|talk]]) 19:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

21154 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21154 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-17 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.310934600E09 +++$+++ Australian positions above 50 aren't archived by any of the standard sources for discographies. If you want to add them to discographies, please wait until they are archived in the Pandora archives (see [[WP:GOODCHARTS]] for links and explanations). When they appear there, then add them with a link to the specific archive.&mdash; +++$+++ Australian positions above 50 aren't archived by any of the standard sources for discographies. If you want to add them to discographies, please wait until they are archived in the Pandora archives (see [[WP:GOODCHARTS]] for links and explanations). When they appear there, then add them with a link to the specific archive.&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 13:30, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
21155 +++$+++ Kww +++$+++ Ss112 +++$+++ 21154 +++$+++ 21154 +++$+++ 2011-07-17 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.310941860E09 +++$+++ I haven't done an exhaustive cleanup, just noticed yours today and recognize your userid as belonging to a generally productive editor. Certainly, we have a problem here. Please don't make it worse.&mdash; +++$+++ :I haven't done an exhaustive cleanup, just noticed yours today and recognize your userid as belonging to a generally productive editor. Certainly, we have a problem here. Please don't make it worse.&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 15:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

283300 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-02 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.175581200E09 +++$+++ I am thinking of working on [[Eric Sykes]] (because he was a genius) and [[Muhammad Ali]] (because he was also a genius with his gloves as well as his mind). I bought both books when I was in London with an Austrian steelworkers English class, so I have the page number CITATIONS. Will that do, you loveable young rogue, you? (P.S. Me Austrian bird knows ''exactly'' who Crestville and Vera Chuck and Dave are. She's probably bored to death by me talking about you both, but she's a good egg, as Vera says... :) P.S. She even knows who Kingboyk is...  +++$+++ I am thinking of working on [[Eric Sykes]] (because he was a genius) and [[Muhammad Ali]] (because he was also a genius with his gloves as well as his mind). I bought both books when I was in London with an Austrian steelworkers English class, so I have the page number CITATIONS. Will that do, you loveable young rogue, you? (P.S. Me Austrian bird knows ''exactly'' who Crestville and Vera Chuck and Dave are. She's probably bored to death by me talking about you both, but she's a good egg, as Vera says... :) P.S. She even knows who Kingboyk is... [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 23:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
283301 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ 2007-04-02 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.175583360E09 +++$+++ Actually - you Oasis sprog - Marion (me bird) loves listening about my trials and tribulations and my funny stories about you lot. She respects people that I respect, because she's interested in this weird thing called English humour (she laughs a lot, but she's not sure why - even though her Uncle was in the S.S., but she doesn't like talking about that... :)) Anyway, after all this complimentary talk about how good-looking you are, I will ask her what she thinks. She might say that you look like a potato with ears, or a pineapple with hair (like I look) but I will send you her comments (in German, with English sub-titles).  +++$+++ :Actually - you Oasis sprog - Marion (me bird) loves listening about my trials and tribulations and my funny stories about you lot. She respects people that I respect, because she's interested in this weird thing called English humour (she laughs a lot, but she's not sure why - even though her Uncle was in the S.S., but she doesn't like talking about that... :)) Anyway, after all this complimentary talk about how good-looking you are, I will ask her what she thinks. She might say that you look like a potato with ears, or a pineapple with hair (like I look) but I will send you her comments (in German, with English sub-titles). [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 23:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
283302 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 00:21:00 +++$+++ 1.175584860E09 +++$+++ Ey ey ey, don't slag off scoucers! Scalleeeeeez! Scally scally, pride of out ally! calm down calm down where's me giro can't buy me love echo and the bunnymen ferry over da merzeee etc. etc. -- +++$+++ :::Ey ey ey, don't slag off scoucers! Scalleeeeeez! Scally scally, pride of out ally! calm down calm down where's me giro can't buy me love echo and the bunnymen ferry over da merzeee etc. etc. --[[User:Crestville|Jimmy Tarbuck or one of the McGann brothers - probably Joe - or some other vaguly racist stereotype (Surprise surprise!)]] 00:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
283303 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.175584440E09 +++$+++ I totally agree with my esteemed colleague's remarks (Lt. Gonville Bromhead VC) as he is a well-respected member of The Insanely-Brave Collective of Firemen who have been knocked unconscious by a steel beam whilst on duty. You young spraffers don't know what a hard day's night is, by gad....  +++$+++ ::::I totally agree with my esteemed colleague's remarks (Lt. Gonville Bromhead VC) as he is a well-respected member of The Insanely-Brave Collective of Firemen who have been knocked unconscious by a steel beam whilst on duty. You young spraffers don't know what a hard day's night is, by gad.... [[User:Andreasegde|Sir Sean de Garde]] 00:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
283304 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.175646120E09 +++$+++ \"You have no idea how [[Hemorrhoid|piles]] can affect one's lifestyle... \"  +++$+++ *"You have no idea how [[Hemorrhoid|piles]] can affect one's lifestyle... " [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 17:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
283305 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.175646780E09 +++$+++ \"You mean you didn't bring the beer? You ''did not'' bring the beer? You really didn't?\"  +++$+++ *"You mean you didn't bring the beer? You ''did not'' bring the beer? You really didn't?" [[User:Andreasegde|Mine's a pint]] 17:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
283306 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ 2007-04-03 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.175646120E09 +++$+++ Says: \"I deeply appreciate your profound thoughts and your philosophical outlook on life...\" Thinks: \"I wonder if she wants to play 'hide the sausage'?\"  +++$+++ *Says: "I deeply appreciate your profound thoughts and your philosophical outlook on life..." Thinks: "I wonder if she wants to play 'hide the sausage'?" [[User:Andreasegde|Mr Love-pump]] 17:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
283307 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ 283300 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.175978400E09 +++$+++ I think talking about other editors on other pages is a silly thing to do, as I look at this page a lot, but, if the editor knows that, it's just a way of having a sly dig.  +++$+++ :I think talking about other editors on other pages is a silly thing to do, as I look at this page a lot, but, if the editor knows that, it's just a way of having a sly dig. [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 13:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

545448 +++$+++ Delicious carbuncle +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545448 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-17 14:13:00 +++$+++ 1.219007580E09 +++$+++ See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:MDCCCXLVIII&curid=18736151&diff=232385625&oldid=230118054 here].   +++$+++ See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MDCCCXLVIII&curid=18736151&diff=232385625&oldid=230118054 here].  [[User:Delicious carbuncle|Delicious carbuncle]] ([[User talk:Delicious carbuncle|talk]]) 14:13, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
545449 +++$+++ Delicious carbuncle +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545448 +++$+++ 545448 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.219100880E09 +++$+++ It is continuing. Should I ask elsewhere for page protection?  +++$+++ :It is continuing. Should I ask elsewhere for page protection? [[User:Delicious carbuncle|Delicious carbuncle]] ([[User talk:Delicious carbuncle|talk]]) 16:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
545450 +++$+++ Delicious carbuncle +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545448 +++$+++ 545449 +++$+++ 2008-08-18 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.219101300E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Thanks. [[User:Delicious carbuncle|Delicious carbuncle]] ([[User talk:Delicious carbuncle|talk]]) 16:15, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

21161 +++$+++ Backtable +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-09 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.270804380E09 +++$+++ Your edit summary to my uploaded picture states that \"see below has a purpose\". I'm sorry, but when it comes to uploading images onto wikipedia, I am a noob. I added an FAL license to the image, but is there still something wrong with its current state? If so, then would you know what that fault with my picture is. I put the image on there for display purposes, as it is on a subpage of my main userpage. Thanks.  +++$+++ Your edit summary to my uploaded picture states that "see below has a purpose". I'm sorry, but when it comes to uploading images onto wikipedia, I am a noob. I added an FAL license to the image, but is there still something wrong with its current state? If so, then would you know what that fault with my picture is. I put the image on there for display purposes, as it is on a subpage of my main userpage. Thanks. [[User:Backtable|<font color = "green">Backtable </font>]]<sub>[[User talk:Backtable|<font color = "brown">Speak to me</font>]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Backtable|<font color = "gray">concerning my deeds.</font>]]</sup> 02:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
21162 +++$+++ Backtable +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21161 +++$+++ 21161 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.270866060E09 +++$+++ It didn't get automatically reverted, so it's probably good enough to last now. Thank you.  +++$+++ :It didn't get automatically reverted, so it's probably good enough to last now. Thank you. [[User:Backtable|<font color = "green">Backtable </font>]]<sub>[[User talk:Backtable|<font color = "brown">Speak to me</font>]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Backtable|<font color = "gray">concerning my deeds.</font>]]</sup> 19:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

114182 +++$+++ Mathsci +++$+++ Stephen B Streater +++$+++ 114182 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-04 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.275660900E09 +++$+++ Since you have been involved in discussion on [[Race and intelligence]], please note this request [[Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case#Race and intelligence]]. Thanks,  +++$+++ Since you have been involved in discussion on [[Race and intelligence]], please note this request [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Race and intelligence]]. Thanks, [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 07:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
114183 +++$+++ Stephen B Streater +++$+++ Stephen B Streater +++$+++ 114182 +++$+++ 114182 +++$+++ 2010-06-04 07:38:00 +++$+++ 1.275662280E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ : Thanks. [[User:Stephen B Streater|Stephen B Streater]] ([[User talk:Stephen B Streater#top|talk]]) 07:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

96724 +++$+++ OnePt618 +++$+++ Farjad0322 +++$+++ 96724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-06 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.275880980E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from [[:Rani Bagh, Hyderabad]]. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee\/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tdel1 --> -- &#x03C6;  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from [[:Rani Bagh, Hyderabad]]. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tdel1 --> -- &#x03C6; [[User:OnePt618|OnePt618]]<sup>[[User talk:OnePt618|Talk]]</sup> &#x03C6;   20:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
96725 +++$+++ Farjad0322 +++$+++ Farjad0322 +++$+++ 96724 +++$+++ 96724 +++$+++ 2010-07-02 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.278102780E09 +++$+++ Okie! Maybe that was a mistake.  +++$+++ :Okie! Maybe that was a mistake. [[User:Farjad0322|Farjad0322]] ([[User talk:Farjad0322#top|talk]]) 13:33, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

21168 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-21 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.274437920E09 +++$+++ I notice [[Special:Contributions\/Mike's bot account|the bot account]] \"[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=363321320 cleared]\" the sandbox with a code that contains [[Template:Welcome to the SandBox!|a non-existent template]]. Do you think it should be updated to [[Template:Please leave this line alone (sandbox heading)|the current one?]]  +++$+++ I notice [[Special:Contributions/Mike's bot account|the bot account]] "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=363321320 cleared]" the sandbox with a code that contains [[Template:Welcome to the SandBox!|a non-existent template]]. Do you think it should be updated to [[Template:Please leave this line alone (sandbox heading)|the current one?]] [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 03:32, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
21169 +++$+++ Mike.lifeguard +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21168 +++$+++ 21168 +++$+++ 2010-05-21 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.274507400E09 +++$+++ It isn't supposed to be editing enwiki at all. &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;<span style=\"color:#4B0082; font-weight:bold;\"> +++$+++ :It isn't supposed to be editing enwiki at all. &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;<span style="color:#4B0082; font-weight:bold;">[[User:Mike.lifeguard|mikelifeguard]]@[[User talk:Mike.lifeguard|enwiki]]:&#126;$&nbsp;</span> 22:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
21170 +++$+++ Mike.lifeguard +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21168 +++$+++ 21168 +++$+++ 2010-05-21 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.274508360E09 +++$+++ (and I fixed it) &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;<span style=\"color:#4B0082; font-weight:bold;\"> +++$+++ :(and I fixed it) &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;<span style="color:#4B0082; font-weight:bold;">[[User:Mike.lifeguard|mikelifeguard]]@[[User talk:Mike.lifeguard|enwiki]]:&#126;$&nbsp;</span> 23:06, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

265672 +++$+++ Hanuman Das +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 06:08:00 +++$+++ 1.163081280E09 +++$+++ <small>Stupid and inconsiderate remark removed by original poster<\/small> &mdash; +++$+++ <small>Stupid and inconsiderate remark removed by original poster</small> &mdash;[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 06:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265673 +++$+++ Salix alba +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265672 +++$+++ 265672 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.163103000E09 +++$+++ [[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] blocked for this see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Hanuman_Das]. -- +++$+++ :[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] blocked for this see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Hanuman_Das]. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 12:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265674 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265672 +++$+++ 265673 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 13:12:00 +++$+++ 1.163106720E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse, I'm sorry that you received the above message.  I see that the user has been blocked.  Yes there is a procedure, which is to file a report at [[WP:AN\/I]].  However, since the user has already been blocked, you should not file a report.  The purpose of the report is to hopefully get the attention of an admin, something that has already occurred.  Again, I'm sorry for the abuse.  -- +++$+++ ::Hi Mattisse, I'm sorry that you received the above message.  I see that the user has been blocked.  Yes there is a procedure, which is to file a report at [[WP:AN/I]].  However, since the user has already been blocked, you should not file a report.  The purpose of the report is to hopefully get the attention of an admin, something that has already occurred.  Again, I'm sorry for the abuse.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 13:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
265675 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265672 +++$+++ 265674 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 13:17:00 +++$+++ 1.163107020E09 +++$+++ Hi, and I am also sorry that I failed to remove the title of this attack from my edit summary. Now it shows up in history lists.  Yuck!  -- +++$+++ :::Hi, and I am also sorry that I failed to remove the title of this attack from my edit summary. Now it shows up in history lists.  Yuck!  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 13:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

545461 +++$+++ Francis89 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-24 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.219619460E09 +++$+++ If there are errors in English or remained some Italian word, if you have time you can give it a try and correct it. Surely you know English better than me! Thank you very much!-- +++$+++ If there are errors in English or remained some Italian word, if you have time you can give it a try and correct it. Surely you know English better than me! Thank you very much!--[[User:Francis89|Francis89]] ([[User talk:Francis89|talk]]) 16:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
545462 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545461 +++$+++ 545461 +++$+++ 2008-08-24 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.219628100E09 +++$+++ [[Defeat Autism Now!]]  +++$+++ * [[Defeat Autism Now!]] [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

21174 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21174 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-10 03:39:00 +++$+++ 1.276166340E09 +++$+++ I noticed when you were tagging \"Undoer\" sockpuppets that you apparently tagged the main account as a sockpuppet of itself. I'm willing to bet that was semi-automated, so perhaps it could be modified to automatically recognize the sockpuppeteer instead and tag the rest as sockpuppets.  +++$+++ I noticed when you were tagging "Undoer" sockpuppets that you apparently tagged the main account as a sockpuppet of itself. I'm willing to bet that was semi-automated, so perhaps it could be modified to automatically recognize the sockpuppeteer instead and tag the rest as sockpuppets. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 03:39, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
21175 +++$+++ Excirial +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21174 +++$+++ 21174 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 08:49:00 +++$+++ 1.276184940E09 +++$+++ Ah yes, this is related to a semi-automated script that i use for blocking. It supports \"Suspected sockpuppet\" and \"Confirmed sockpuppet\", but does not allow you to tag someone as a puppet master directly. Most times i end unblocking and tagging the puppet master manually, but in this case i blocked them all as sock puppets since i was still busy searching if there has been an undoer account without a number. I forgot to switch the template afterwards. But indeed, a \"puppetmaster\" option would be neat.  +++$+++ : Ah yes, this is related to a semi-automated script that i use for blocking. It supports "Suspected sockpuppet" and "Confirmed sockpuppet", but does not allow you to tag someone as a puppet master directly. Most times i end unblocking and tagging the puppet master manually, but in this case i blocked them all as sock puppets since i was still busy searching if there has been an undoer account without a number. I forgot to switch the template afterwards. But indeed, a "puppetmaster" option would be neat. [[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contact me</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup> 08:49, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

21178 +++$+++ 98.177.155.42 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21178 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-20 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.277038080E09 +++$+++ Are u saying you're the only one who can edit testbox? [[Special:Contributions\/98.177.155.42|98.177.155.42]] ( +++$+++ Are u saying you're the only one who can edit testbox? [[Special:Contributions/98.177.155.42|98.177.155.42]] ([[User talk:98.177.155.42|talk]]) 05:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
21179 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21178 +++$+++ 21178 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.277040660E09 +++$+++ No, it's just a deterrent, although the edit probably will get reverted by an admin.  +++$+++ *No, it's just a deterrent, although the edit probably will get reverted by an admin. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 06:31, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

283325 +++$+++ Abu badali +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283325 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-11 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.176351660E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user={{PAGENAMEE}}}} this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags\/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 21:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. '' +++$+++ If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user={{PAGENAMEE}}}} this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 21:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. ''[[User:Abu badali|Abu badali]] <sup>([[User_talk:Abu badali|talk]])</sup>'' 21:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
283326 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283325 +++$+++ 283325 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.176510660E09 +++$+++ You have uploaded '''[[Image:Crestville Sir.jpg]]''', which I doubt that you took yourself. If your hands were not on the actual camera button at the time, they must have been somewhere else. Please state: Who took the photograph, where it was taken and at what time, what state of alcoholic dementia you were in, and your reasons for having requested it to be taken. Also state, ''however'', where your hands really were at the time. Thanks.  +++$+++ :You have uploaded '''[[Image:Crestville Sir.jpg]]''', which I doubt that you took yourself. If your hands were not on the actual camera button at the time, they must have been somewhere else. Please state: Who took the photograph, where it was taken and at what time, what state of alcoholic dementia you were in, and your reasons for having requested it to be taken. Also state, ''however'', where your hands really were at the time. Thanks. [[User:Andreasegde|Mr Foto (not from Japan)]] 17:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

545470 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-26 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.219803360E09 +++$+++ Tim, I need your input on some recent fiddling at [[WP:FA]] (look in the edit history there, as well as [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_articles&curid=5921878&diff=234382249&oldid=234351373 this latest diff] and the post on my talk page.  The bio\/medicine split was the subject of several long discussions.  See [[Wikipedia talk:Featured articles#Flora and fauna section]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Featured articles#Splitting Biology (again)]].  I usually defer to Raul on that page, but Yomangani had one opinion, Marskell another, Casliber another and now a new person is moving things around.  Best,  +++$+++ Tim, I need your input on some recent fiddling at [[WP:FA]] (look in the edit history there, as well as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_articles&curid=5921878&diff=234382249&oldid=234351373 this latest diff] and the post on my talk page.  The bio/medicine split was the subject of several long discussions.  See [[Wikipedia talk:Featured articles#Flora and fauna section]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Featured articles#Splitting Biology (again)]].  I usually defer to Raul on that page, but Yomangani had one opinion, Marskell another, Casliber another and now a new person is moving things around.  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
545471 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545470 +++$+++ 545470 +++$+++ 2008-08-26 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.219819740E09 +++$+++ Okay; if you get a chance, can you check the rest of the Health and medicine category?  Thank you, Tim!   +++$+++ : Okay; if you get a chance, can you check the rest of the Health and medicine category?  Thank you, Tim!  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
545472 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545470 +++$+++ 545471 +++$+++ 2008-08-26 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.219819980E09 +++$+++ And in all your spare time :-) you might cast your eyes over [[WP:FFA]] as well.   +++$+++ :: And in all your spare time :-) you might cast your eyes over [[WP:FFA]] as well.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:53, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
545473 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545470 +++$+++ 545472 +++$+++ 2008-08-26 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.219820160E09 +++$+++ The mockups were six-month old history, now deleted.  We went ahead and did the split of biology into Biology vs. Health and medicine, per Rauls' final comment on the second thread.  The mockups are in the old history on my sandbox pages, but since Yomangani left, Raul, Marskell and I just went ahead and split according to Raul's criterion.  Remaining now is for you to see if you have any disagreements at [[WP:FA]] and [[WP:FFA]].   +++$+++ ::: The mockups were six-month old history, now deleted.  We went ahead and did the split of biology into Biology vs. Health and medicine, per Rauls' final comment on the second thread.  The mockups are in the old history on my sandbox pages, but since Yomangani left, Raul, Marskell and I just went ahead and split according to Raul's criterion.  Remaining now is for you to see if you have any disagreements at [[WP:FA]] and [[WP:FFA]].  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

21185 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21185 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-19 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.282217340E09 +++$+++ Hi, mech. I think it's better to promote the single template [[:Template:uw-block]] with the indef parameter in the documentation.  All of the other specific issue block templates use the indef parameter, so I think it's actually more confusing that the generalized template, and only the generalized template, has a redirect for an indefinite block. The purpose of the parser functions is to reduce the need for multiple templates and redirects, so I think it's counterproductive to promote them. Thoughts? -- +++$+++ Hi, mech. I think it's better to promote the single template [[:Template:uw-block]] with the indef parameter in the documentation.  All of the other specific issue block templates use the indef parameter, so I think it's actually more confusing that the generalized template, and only the generalized template, has a redirect for an indefinite block. The purpose of the parser functions is to reduce the need for multiple templates and redirects, so I think it's counterproductive to promote them. Thoughts? --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 04:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
21186 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21185 +++$+++ 21185 +++$+++ 2010-08-19 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.282217760E09 +++$+++ Great. Sorry about the accidental transclusion. I used braces instead of brackets by mistake (I thought I was in a template for a moment), but you'll see from the history that I saw my error and corrected it right away. Actually, the colon only matters for categories. -- +++$+++ :Great. Sorry about the accidental transclusion. I used braces instead of brackets by mistake (I thought I was in a template for a moment), but you'll see from the history that I saw my error and corrected it right away. Actually, the colon only matters for categories. --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 04:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

21187 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21187 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-19 04:50:00 +++$+++ 1.282218600E09 +++$+++ May I speedy G7 [[Template:uw-indefinite]]? I think it's an unlikely misnomer, since it doesn't have the word block in it. -- +++$+++ May I speedy G7 [[Template:uw-indefinite]]? I think it's an unlikely misnomer, since it doesn't have the word block in it. --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 04:50, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
21188 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21187 +++$+++ 21187 +++$+++ 2010-08-19 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.282218780E09 +++$+++ I did it so no bad faith would be assumed. I was actually wondering myself but also considered if others thought it would be useful.  +++$+++ *I did it so no bad faith would be assumed. I was actually wondering myself but also considered if others thought it would be useful. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 04:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
21189 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21187 +++$+++ 21188 +++$+++ 2010-08-19 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.282219380E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I do think indefblock is a good one. -- +++$+++ **Thanks. I do think indefblock is a good one. --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 05:03, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

568093 +++$+++ 72.189.108.185 +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568093 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-11 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.281564180E09 +++$+++ Now, why would you revert my edit, when you could have taken out the \"offensive\" part and left the changes that were accurate and relevant?  Oh, that would have required too much responsibility and \"effort\" I suppose.  [[Special:Contributions\/72.189.108.185|72.189.108.185]] ( +++$+++ Now, why would you revert my edit, when you could have taken out the "offensive" part and left the changes that were accurate and relevant?  Oh, that would have required too much responsibility and "effort" I suppose.  [[Special:Contributions/72.189.108.185|72.189.108.185]] ([[User talk:72.189.108.185|talk]]) 15:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
568094 +++$+++ DMacks +++$+++ NHRHS2010 +++$+++ 568093 +++$+++ 568093 +++$+++ 2010-08-11 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.281564780E09 +++$+++ Taking the other side, why wouldn't you just change the content instead of inserting a comment about it and why be surprised when your edit is removed given you already have a strong opinion about this site?  +++$+++ :Taking the other side, why wouldn't you just change the content instead of inserting a comment about it and why be surprised when your edit is removed given you already have a strong opinion about this site? [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 15:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

283333 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283333 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-18 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.176952680E09 +++$+++ There you go - job done, and nobody can complain :))  +++$+++ There you go - job done, and nobody can complain :)) [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 20:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
283334 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283333 +++$+++ 283333 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.177097340E09 +++$+++ Joe, I've just seen on my watchlist that another editor has reverted your last post to andrea with the edit summary:\"Rv Attack\" LOL, LOL! Cheers la,  +++$+++ *Joe, I've just seen on my watchlist that another editor has reverted your last post to andrea with the edit summary:"Rv Attack" LOL, LOL! Cheers la, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 12:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
283335 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283333 +++$+++ 283334 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.177099320E09 +++$+++ Aha! The demon drink! Do you want me to revert it? Cheers la,  +++$+++ ::Aha! The demon drink! Do you want me to revert it? Cheers la, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 13:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
283336 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283333 +++$+++ 283335 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.177099500E09 +++$+++ Nice one our Joe!  +++$+++ :::Nice one our Joe! [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 13:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
283337 +++$+++ Kingboyk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283333 +++$+++ 283336 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.177100280E09 +++$+++ It was a fair reversion. Wikipedia talk pages aren't meant to be for social chat, and an editor was blocked recently over an episode a bit like this (one talk page invited insults, another editor duly obliged, somebody else told him off, he then abused that person and got blocked). Just a word of warning to the wise. -- +++$+++ ::::It was a fair reversion. Wikipedia talk pages aren't meant to be for social chat, and an editor was blocked recently over an episode a bit like this (one talk page invited insults, another editor duly obliged, somebody else told him off, he then abused that person and got blocked). Just a word of warning to the wise. --[[User:Kingboyk|kingboyk]] 13:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
283338 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283333 +++$+++ 283337 +++$+++ 2007-04-21 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.177194660E09 +++$+++ In my measly and sly way, is it allowed to insult one's own good self? I could have mountains of fun with that one, believe me. :)) Nah, it probably wouldn't be allowed, especially by that stupid, northern, arrogant dickhead with a fixation on big tits (sorry big Ts) called andreasegde, and who has a bleedin' birds name an' all. I wish he'd sod off back to sausage chomping land...   +++$+++ :::::In my measly and sly way, is it allowed to insult one's own good self? I could have mountains of fun with that one, believe me. :)) Nah, it probably wouldn't be allowed, especially by that stupid, northern, arrogant dickhead with a fixation on big tits (sorry big Ts) called andreasegde, and who has a bleedin' birds name an' all. I wish he'd sod off back to sausage chomping land...  [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 15:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
283339 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283333 +++$+++ 283338 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.177434540E09 +++$+++ Ditto-- +++$+++ ::::::Ditto--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 10:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
283340 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283333 +++$+++ 283339 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.177634640E09 +++$+++ Uhh-err missus....   +++$+++ :::::::Uhh-err missus....  [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 17:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

21190 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21190 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-20 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.282365900E09 +++$+++ Mecha, what's the purpose of separating the \"one the block expires\" portion, please? -- +++$+++ Mecha, what's the purpose of separating the "one the block expires" portion, please? --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 21:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
21191 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21190 +++$+++ 21190 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.282366080E09 +++$+++ Specifically so that the templates can be changed with only one edit as opposed to going into each template one-by-one.  +++$+++ *Specifically so that the templates can be changed with only one edit as opposed to going into each template one-by-one. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 21:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
21192 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21190 +++$+++ 21191 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.282366200E09 +++$+++ Right, but why not keep it in uw-block? -- +++$+++ **Right, but why not keep it in uw-block? --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 21:50, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
21193 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21190 +++$+++ 21192 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.282366320E09 +++$+++ I did that too. Since I'm trying to preserve some of the wording used in individual templates, there are occasions where metaback is not possible.  +++$+++ ***I did that too. Since I'm trying to preserve some of the wording used in individual templates, there are occasions where metaback is not possible. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 21:52, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
21194 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21190 +++$+++ 21193 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.282366500E09 +++$+++ I meant why transclude it into uw-block. Could you show me which template it doesn't work for? -- +++$+++ **** I meant why transclude it into uw-block. Could you show me which template it doesn't work for? --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 21:55, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
21195 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21190 +++$+++ 21194 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.282366680E09 +++$+++ Oh, it works for all of the ones it's on. However, some of the block templates do not transclude the uw-block itself.  +++$+++ ***** Oh, it works for all of the ones it's on. However, some of the block templates do not transclude the uw-block itself. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 21:58, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
21196 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21190 +++$+++ 21195 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.282367460E09 +++$+++ Ok. Fine for now, but let's see if we can get all the block templates on uw-block eventually. Calling multiple templates increases server load. Thanks for your work. -- +++$+++ ******Ok. Fine for now, but let's see if we can get all the block templates on uw-block eventually. Calling multiple templates increases server load. Thanks for your work. --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 22:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

283341 +++$+++ Kingboyk +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283341 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-23 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.177395120E09 +++$+++ Where's your Germanic friend with the girl's name? You know, the one who used to be in U2! I need his help with the [[Mimi Smith]] article :) -- +++$+++ Where's your Germanic friend with the girl's name? You know, the one who used to be in U2! I need his help with the [[Mimi Smith]] article :) --[[User:Kingboyk|kingboyk]] 23:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
283342 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283341 +++$+++ 283341 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 01:56:00 +++$+++ 1.177404960E09 +++$+++ I am here, and I will... (Uhh, stop it - you know how much I like a good FA...)  +++$+++ :I am here, and I will... (Uhh, stop it - you know how much I like a good FA...) [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 01:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

545486 +++$+++ Wikitrevor +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-07 01:44:00 +++$+++ 1.220777040E09 +++$+++ Best regards, -- +++$+++ Best regards, --[[User:Wikitrevor|Wikitrevor]] ([[User talk:Wikitrevor|talk]]) 01:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
545487 +++$+++ JimmyButler +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545486 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-08 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.220864520E09 +++$+++ Kudo's to Trevor; he is bright enough to solicit help from one of the best science editors on Wikipedia. Tim, regarding how much to help. My hopes are that the students will step up and generate the content and required citations. Formatting, organization, guidance on writing style, and grammar will likely need considerable tweaking. You may recall \"The List\" generated on the discussion of [[Introduction to Evolution]] page by [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]]. Basically pointing out concerns; but leaving them to find solutions. Its a fine line, I agree; however, they should play the role of the primary editor. They are allowed multiple attempts at GA; so if they are gutted the first time - then they can always bounce back. Thanks for offering to mentor. If any concerns should arise feel free to email at my school account, -- +++$+++ :: Kudo's to Trevor; he is bright enough to solicit help from one of the best science editors on Wikipedia. Tim, regarding how much to help. My hopes are that the students will step up and generate the content and required citations. Formatting, organization, guidance on writing style, and grammar will likely need considerable tweaking. You may recall "The List" generated on the discussion of [[Introduction to Evolution]] page by [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]]. Basically pointing out concerns; but leaving them to find solutions. Its a fine line, I agree; however, they should play the role of the primary editor. They are allowed multiple attempts at GA; so if they are gutted the first time - then they can always bounce back. Thanks for offering to mentor. If any concerns should arise feel free to email at my school account, --[[User:JimmyButler|JimmyButler]] ([[User talk:JimmyButler|talk]]) 02:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

21199 +++$+++ Prosfilaes +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21199 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-06 06:50:00 +++$+++ 1.283781000E09 +++$+++ In all countries I'm familiar with, copyright runs through the end of the year. The works of someone who died in 1940 will leave copyright in life+70 nations on January 1st, 2011.-- +++$+++ In all countries I'm familiar with, copyright runs through the end of the year. The works of someone who died in 1940 will leave copyright in life+70 nations on January 1st, 2011.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 06:50, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
21200 +++$+++ Prosfilaes +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21199 +++$+++ 21199 +++$+++ 2010-09-06 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.283781600E09 +++$+++ And it's not life+70 in the US; see [[United_States_copyright_law#Duration_of_copyright]] for all the gruesome details, but basically works published more than 95 years ago (again, rounded up to the end of the year) or prior to 1923 (out of copyright before the last extension) are out of copyright in the US.-- +++$+++ : And it's not life+70 in the US; see [[United_States_copyright_law#Duration_of_copyright]] for all the gruesome details, but basically works published more than 95 years ago (again, rounded up to the end of the year) or prior to 1923 (out of copyright before the last extension) are out of copyright in the US.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 07:00, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
21201 +++$+++ Prosfilaes +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21199 +++$+++ 21200 +++$+++ 2010-09-06 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.283817600E09 +++$+++ No, it's not life+70 in the US. Please read [http:\/\/www.copyright.gov\/circs\/circ15a.pdf The US Copyright Office's circular on the duration of copyright] or [http:\/\/copyright.cornell.edu\/resources\/publicdomain.cfm Cornell University's summary of the duration of US copyright]. The only cases where it's life+70 is where the work was first published after 2002.-- +++$+++ :: No, it's not life+70 in the US. Please read [http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ15a.pdf The US Copyright Office's circular on the duration of copyright] or [http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm Cornell University's summary of the duration of US copyright]. The only cases where it's life+70 is where the work was first published after 2002.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 17:00, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

283344 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283344 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-28 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.177812180E09 +++$+++ <div style=\"margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; float: left; border: 5px yellow ridge; width: 100px;\">[[Image:PeanutButterJellyStar.gif|100px]]<\/div> For absolutely no reason at all...[[:Image:PeanutButterJellyStar.gif|Dancing peanut butter jellybean-thingy]].  +++$+++ <div style="margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; float: left; border: 5px yellow ridge; width: 100px;">[[Image:PeanutButterJellyStar.gif|100px]]</div> For absolutely no reason at all...[[:Image:PeanutButterJellyStar.gif|Dancing peanut butter jellybean-thingy]]. [[User:Andreasegde|The sneaky BASTARD...]] 19:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
283345 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283344 +++$+++ 283344 +++$+++ 2007-04-29 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.177888740E09 +++$+++ I apologise for constantly putting silly messages on people's pages, but I can't help it. My only explanation is that one has to be silly to balance out the boring, hard-working bits in ones's life. If one has a 'beef' with someone, then one should talk about it. What exactly is your rump\/'beef'?  +++$+++ :I apologise for constantly putting silly messages on people's pages, but I can't help it. My only explanation is that one has to be silly to balance out the boring, hard-working bits in ones's life. If one has a 'beef' with someone, then one should talk about it. What exactly is your rump/'beef'? [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 16:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

21202 +++$+++ Kintetsubuffalo +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21202 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.283894460E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the cat! Does that mean you will be helping us knock these out? (I hope I hope fingers crossed)-- +++$+++ Thank you for the cat! Does that mean you will be helping us knock these out? (I hope I hope fingers crossed)--[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris (クリス • フィッチ)]] ([[User talk:Kintetsubuffalo|talk]]) 14:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
21203 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21202 +++$+++ 21202 +++$+++ 2010-09-07 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.283894940E09 +++$+++ I guess so. I don't really know how to convert such images to SVG, but I do know how to place them in different categories.  +++$+++ *I guess so. I don't really know how to convert such images to SVG, but I do know how to place them in different categories. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 14:29, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

21205 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-20 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.284967320E09 +++$+++ Hi Mecha. You're doing great stuff. Thanks for it. I'm concerned, however, that the block-no-talk template and parameter in the metatemplate will usually contravene the blocking policy. The blocking policy states, \"editing of the user's talk page should only be disabled in the case of continued abuse of the talk page.\" Therefore, it's never permissible to disable talk page editing at the time the block is instituted. Doing so will always be subsequent action. I'm concerned that admins seeing the option in this template will be encouraged to enable it from the start. We should instead develop a new template ''designed'' to be used ''subsequent'' to one of our uw-block templates, similar to [[Template:Unblock talk-revoked]], but without the unblock part. What do you think? -- +++$+++ Hi Mecha. You're doing great stuff. Thanks for it. I'm concerned, however, that the block-no-talk template and parameter in the metatemplate will usually contravene the blocking policy. The blocking policy states, "editing of the user's talk page should only be disabled in the case of continued abuse of the talk page." Therefore, it's never permissible to disable talk page editing at the time the block is instituted. Doing so will always be subsequent action. I'm concerned that admins seeing the option in this template will be encouraged to enable it from the start. We should instead develop a new template ''designed'' to be used ''subsequent'' to one of our uw-block templates, similar to [[Template:Unblock talk-revoked]], but without the unblock part. What do you think? --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 00:22, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
21206 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21205 +++$+++ 21205 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.284967800E09 +++$+++ I can only think of one situation when it might be appropriate to revoke the tp from the start. That's when the reason for the block in the first place is misconduct on the user's tp. We could design a template to address that. -- +++$+++ :I can only think of one situation when it might be appropriate to revoke the tp from the start. That's when the reason for the block in the first place is misconduct on the user's tp. We could design a template to address that. --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 00:30, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
21207 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21205 +++$+++ 21206 +++$+++ 2010-09-20 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.284967980E09 +++$+++ Yes, that's exactly what I meant by the above. Before they're initially blocked. -- +++$+++ ::Yes, that's exactly what I meant by the above. Before they're initially blocked. --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 00:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

545494 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-11 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.221179220E09 +++$+++ Tim, Chagas is getting close; we may be able to remove it from the citations list.  But there's a discussion about the apostrophe [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:MED#FAs_needing_review here;] unless you object, it seems everyone so far says to lose the apostrophe.  Best,  +++$+++ Tim, Chagas is getting close; we may be able to remove it from the citations list.  But there's a discussion about the apostrophe [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:MED#FAs_needing_review here;] unless you object, it seems everyone so far says to lose the apostrophe.  Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
545495 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545494 +++$+++ 545494 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 19:51:00 +++$+++ 1.221187860E09 +++$+++ Hey Tim\u2014just saw who your supervisor was. Wouldn't you like to work on the article a bit? I'm sure you could add something to the Treatment section (hint, hint ;)  +++$+++ :Hey Tim—just saw who your supervisor was. Wouldn't you like to work on the article a bit? I'm sure you could add something to the Treatment section (hint, hint ;) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 19:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

545496 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-11 22:15:00 +++$+++ 1.221196500E09 +++$+++ Have you had a chance to read my e-mail yet? I'm kinda stuck... -- +++$+++ Have you had a chance to read my e-mail yet? I'm kinda stuck... --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 22:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
545497 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545496 +++$+++ 545496 +++$+++ 2008-09-11 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.221201180E09 +++$+++ No problem, I realise your time is precious, especially since that video from Bill praising you at Wikimania [[Image:smiley.png|16px]] -- +++$+++ :No problem, I realise your time is precious, especially since that video from Bill praising you at Wikimania [[Image:smiley.png|16px]] --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 23:33, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

21209 +++$+++ Daniel Case +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21209 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-23 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.285277640E09 +++$+++ Autoblock disabled (Love your editnotice!)  +++$+++ Autoblock disabled (Love your editnotice!) [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 14:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
21210 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21209 +++$+++ 21209 +++$+++ 2010-09-23 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.285277820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the compliment!  +++$+++ *Thanks for the compliment! [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 14:37, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

283355 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283355 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-01 11:52:00 +++$+++ 1.178045520E09 +++$+++ I know a kid called Sharlotte. Fucking idiots.-- +++$+++ I know a kid called Sharlotte. Fucking idiots.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 11:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
283356 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283355 +++$+++ 283355 +++$+++ 2007-05-01 12:04:00 +++$+++ 1.178046240E09 +++$+++ Yeah I belive yer. Know any fucking Meta's?-- +++$+++ :Yeah I belive yer. Know any fucking Meta's?--[[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 12:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
283357 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283355 +++$+++ 283356 +++$+++ 2007-05-01 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.178058960E09 +++$+++ Greta's worth a fiver deffo! Giss yer address an it'll be in the post! Did she really die or are you windin me up?  +++$+++ ::Greta's worth a fiver deffo! Giss yer address an it'll be in the post! Did she really die or are you windin me up? [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 15:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
283358 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283355 +++$+++ 283357 +++$+++ 2007-05-03 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.178241840E09 +++$+++ LOL! That's dead funny, but by the same token (no I'm not takin the piss) very touching. I love rhubard - me Wife makes it inta pies, but first she cooks it very slowly in lemonade - dead gear with cream, real boss! Cheers la,  +++$+++ :::LOL! That's dead funny, but by the same token (no I'm not takin the piss) very touching. I love rhubard - me Wife makes it inta pies, but first she cooks it very slowly in lemonade - dead gear with cream, real boss! Cheers la, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 18:24, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

21214 +++$+++ SpikeToronto +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21214 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-14 18:17:00 +++$+++ 1.287105420E09 +++$+++ Hi Mechamind. When you updated the {{tlx|Vandalism information}} template with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3AVandalism_information&action=historysubmit&diff=390713302&oldid=390647903 this edit], you forgot to change the signature from me to you. So, with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3AVandalism_information&action=historysubmit&diff=390730173&oldid=390713302 this edit], I put it in for you. Thanks! \u2014 ''' +++$+++ Hi Mechamind. When you updated the {{tlx|Vandalism information}} template with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AVandalism_information&action=historysubmit&diff=390713302&oldid=390647903 this edit], you forgot to change the signature from me to you. So, with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AVandalism_information&action=historysubmit&diff=390730173&oldid=390713302 this edit], I put it in for you. Thanks! — '''[[User:SpikeToronto|<font color="#DC143C" face="Garamond" size="3">Spike</font>]][[User talk:SpikeToronto|<font color="#000000" face="Garamond" size="3">Toronto</font>]]''' 18:17, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
21215 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21214 +++$+++ 21214 +++$+++ 2010-10-14 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.287107400E09 +++$+++ If that's the case, thanks!  +++$+++ *If that's the case, thanks! [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 18:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
21216 +++$+++ SpikeToronto +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21214 +++$+++ 21215 +++$+++ 2010-10-14 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.287107880E09 +++$+++ ''If'' that\u2019s the case? The [[WP:diffs|diffs]] show us that it was. It\u2019s just that it was not my report and so should not have my name attached. It was your report and so should have your name attached. My report was from 10 hours earlier. Thanks! \u2014 ''' +++$+++ ::''If'' that’s the case? The [[WP:diffs|diffs]] show us that it was. It’s just that it was not my report and so should not have my name attached. It was your report and so should have your name attached. My report was from 10 hours earlier. Thanks! — '''[[User:SpikeToronto|<font color="#DC143C" face="Garamond" size="3">Spike</font>]][[User talk:SpikeToronto|<font color="#000000" face="Garamond" size="3">Toronto</font>]]''' 18:58, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
21217 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21214 +++$+++ 21216 +++$+++ 2010-10-14 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.287107940E09 +++$+++ By \"If that's the case\", I'm referring to requiring a signature even when you aren't changing the text outside of the level number itself.  +++$+++ :::By "If that's the case", I'm referring to requiring a signature even when you aren't changing the text outside of the level number itself. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 18:59, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
21218 +++$+++ SpikeToronto +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21214 +++$+++ 21217 +++$+++ 2010-10-14 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.287110160E09 +++$+++ Ah! I misunderstood. Thank you so much for clearing that up! As for the signature, yes it is required whenever the \u201creport\u201d is changed. Thanks! \u2014 ''' +++$+++ ::::Ah! I misunderstood. Thank you so much for clearing that up! As for the signature, yes it is required whenever the “report” is changed. Thanks! — '''[[User:SpikeToronto|<font color="#DC143C" face="Garamond" size="3">Spike</font>]][[User talk:SpikeToronto|<font color="#000000" face="Garamond" size="3">Toronto</font>]]''' 19:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

283359 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283359 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-03 16:53:00 +++$+++ 1.178236380E09 +++$+++ By very boring men in tweed jackets smoking pipes.-- +++$+++ By very boring men in tweed jackets smoking pipes.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 16:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
283360 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283359 +++$+++ 283359 +++$+++ 2007-05-03 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.178236860E09 +++$+++ \"Barry Manilow was a well-respected and much-loved performer, who, along with lesser-known acts like Sir Paul McCartney, wrote some splendid songs in the form of ballads.\" Arrgghhh....  +++$+++ *"Barry Manilow was a well-respected and much-loved performer, who, along with lesser-known acts like Sir Paul McCartney, wrote some splendid songs in the form of ballads." Arrgghhh.... [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 17:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
283361 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283359 +++$+++ 283359 +++$+++ 2007-05-03 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.178237400E09 +++$+++ This could be a whole article in Wha!-Pedia in 100 years. \"Oasis were derivatively named (see [[oasis]]) and occupied a minor slot in the latter half of the 20th century with songs distinctly similar to American groups like [[The Monkees]] and British artists like [[The Sex Pistols]]\". The nightmare would be unbearable....  +++$+++ :This could be a whole article in Wha!-Pedia in 100 years. "Oasis were derivatively named (see [[oasis]]) and occupied a minor slot in the latter half of the 20th century with songs distinctly similar to American groups like [[The Monkees]] and British artists like [[The Sex Pistols]]". The nightmare would be unbearable.... [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 17:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

21219 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21219 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-16 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.287237480E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to alert you that I altered the welcome and warning notice that you left for [[User:Iit powai37]] as it included a personal attack in the article name (which I deleted) and I didn't think it would good to leave it on the user's talk page. --  +++$+++ Just wanted to alert you that I altered the welcome and warning notice that you left for [[User:Iit powai37]] as it included a personal attack in the article name (which I deleted) and I didn't think it would good to leave it on the user's talk page. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo|talk]]) 06:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
21220 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21219 +++$+++ 21219 +++$+++ 2010-10-16 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.287237600E09 +++$+++ I can live with that.  +++$+++ :I can live with that. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 07:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

21222 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21222 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-10 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.289403240E09 +++$+++ [[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px]][[Template:Defban]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Defban|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice-->  +++$+++ [[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px]][[Template:Defban]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Defban|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> [[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 07:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
21223 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21222 +++$+++ 21222 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.289431140E09 +++$+++ You'll probably get more attention by notifying one of the users who worked on the template years ago and is still on Wikipedia since the past month.  +++$+++ :You'll probably get more attention by notifying one of the users who worked on the template years ago and is still on Wikipedia since the past month. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 15:19, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
21224 +++$+++ Bsherr +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21222 +++$+++ 21223 +++$+++ 2010-11-10 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.289431980E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure which user you mean, but feel free to notify any users you please. Thanks. -- +++$+++ ::I'm not sure which user you mean, but feel free to notify any users you please. Thanks. --[[User:Bsherr|Bsherr]] ([[User talk:Bsherr|talk]]) 15:33, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

21226 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-23 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.290526560E09 +++$+++ I just noticed that you moved the signatures to outside of the block notice box.  The resulting change makes the notice look very odd to me.  Was there a discussion on moving the signature outside of the box?  I see discussions on modifying the entire notice format, but nothing on the signature location. --  +++$+++ I just noticed that you moved the signatures to outside of the block notice box.  The resulting change makes the notice look very odd to me.  Was there a discussion on moving the signature outside of the box?  I see discussions on modifying the entire notice format, but nothing on the signature location. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo|talk]]) 07:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
21227 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21226 +++$+++ 21226 +++$+++ 2010-11-23 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.290552540E09 +++$+++ Speaking of odd, not all signatures appear to be the same size. Although I do see why you changed it back if some signatures containing incomplete code (such as only one <nowiki>'''<\/nowiki> in it).  +++$+++ *Speaking of odd, not all signatures appear to be the same size. Although I do see why you changed it back if some signatures containing incomplete code (such as only one <nowiki>'''</nowiki> in it). [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 14:49, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
21228 +++$+++ Gogo Dodo +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21226 +++$+++ 21227 +++$+++ 2010-11-23 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.290557940E09 +++$+++ I didn't change it back, [[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] did, though I agree with the change back. --  +++$+++ ::I didn't change it back, [[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] did, though I agree with the change back. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo|talk]]) 16:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

21229 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21229 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-30 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.291124700E09 +++$+++ Could you say why you think [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File:DorothyPound.jpg&curid=28412845&diff=399665337&oldid=390617842 this] is PD in the U.S.? What matters is when it was published, not taken, or when the author died. <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ Could you say why you think [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:DorothyPound.jpg&curid=28412845&diff=399665337&oldid=390617842 this] is PD in the U.S.? What matters is when it was published, not taken, or when the author died. <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|contribs]]</font></sup></small> 05:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
21230 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21229 +++$+++ 21229 +++$+++ 2010-12-25 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.293329220E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm honestly not sure why there's the {{tlx|noadminbacklog}} tag to which the bots which when there's no backlog. Given that each change seems to be determined by line, I figure that removing the tag would be more efficient too. Of course, the HBC helperbots would need to be reprogrammed a little bit.  +++$+++ :Yeah, I'm honestly not sure why there's the {{tlx|noadminbacklog}} tag to which the bots which when there's no backlog. Given that each change seems to be determined by line, I figure that removing the tag would be more efficient too. Of course, the HBC helperbots would need to be reprogrammed a little bit. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 18:07, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

283375 +++$+++ Rekiwi +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283375 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-15 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.179297540E09 +++$+++ Heh. Thanks. I really geeked out there. Oftentimes it makes me sound like a real know-it-all twat, but I just can't help myself. Airplane sounds do strange things to me and the RR\/Packard Merlin is very distinctive. Good thing there wasn't enough room to opine about the possible aircraft types (Mustangs or Spits or Hurris or a Lanc or...)  +++$+++ Heh. Thanks. I really geeked out there. Oftentimes it makes me sound like a real know-it-all twat, but I just can't help myself. Airplane sounds do strange things to me and the RR/Packard Merlin is very distinctive. Good thing there wasn't enough room to opine about the possible aircraft types (Mustangs or Spits or Hurris or a Lanc or...) [[User:Rekiwi|Rekiwi]] 23:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
283376 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283375 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 16:27:00 +++$+++ 1.179444420E09 +++$+++ Lost me!-- +++$+++ ::Lost me!--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 16:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
283377 +++$+++ Rekiwi +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283375 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-06 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.181125260E09 +++$+++ Sorry, Crestville. We should find a more more appropriate forum. In the meantime: No way I can argue there, Less. The Centaurus is the king of the radial beasts. Griffon\/P-51? Good question. Why not? The P-51 was a British-spec airframe. Parts have always been scarce though. The answer might be aesthetics: you'd probably have to rape the clean lines of the P-51 with those tumor-like bumps to clear the Griffon's valve train, as with the Griffon-pulled Spitfires. But aesthetics could hardly count to a people who inflicted the [[Fairey Gannet]] on the world. The monstrous beauty of the sleeve-valved Centaurus can only partially make up for that flying abortion.  +++$+++ ::: Sorry, Crestville. We should find a more more appropriate forum. In the meantime: No way I can argue there, Less. The Centaurus is the king of the radial beasts. Griffon/P-51? Good question. Why not? The P-51 was a British-spec airframe. Parts have always been scarce though. The answer might be aesthetics: you'd probably have to rape the clean lines of the P-51 with those tumor-like bumps to clear the Griffon's valve train, as with the Griffon-pulled Spitfires. But aesthetics could hardly count to a people who inflicted the [[Fairey Gannet]] on the world. The monstrous beauty of the sleeve-valved Centaurus can only partially make up for that flying abortion. [[User:Rekiwi|Rekiwi]] 03:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
283378 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283375 +++$+++ 283375 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.179460800E09 +++$+++ What is \"Lesbian ham\"?  +++$+++ :What is "Lesbian ham"? [[User:Andreasegde|egde]] 21:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

21233 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21233 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-13 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.294943760E09 +++$+++ Hi. This article had a PROD, due to expire in two days time, on the ground that what it claimed could not be verified and was a probable hoax. You removed that PROD, and my PROD2, with edit summary \"Clearing for BLP-prod.\" That seems a pointless exercise which will leave this nonsense up for another unnecessary eight days. I am minded to restore the original PROD; the rules say that may be done only if the removal was \"''clearly not an objection to deletion.''\" So my question is, was your removal of this PROD an objection to deletion on the grounds stated - unverifiable, likely hoax?  +++$+++ Hi. This article had a PROD, due to expire in two days time, on the ground that what it claimed could not be verified and was a probable hoax. You removed that PROD, and my PROD2, with edit summary "Clearing for BLP-prod." That seems a pointless exercise which will leave this nonsense up for another unnecessary eight days. I am minded to restore the original PROD; the rules say that may be done only if the removal was "''clearly not an objection to deletion.''" So my question is, was your removal of this PROD an objection to deletion on the grounds stated - unverifiable, likely hoax? [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 10:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
21234 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21233 +++$+++ 21233 +++$+++ 2011-01-13 11:29:00 +++$+++ 1.294946940E09 +++$+++ On second thoughts, I have restored the original PROD. This would be improper only if your removal was \"an objection to deletion\" - if so, let me know, and I will dePROD again and probably AfD.  +++$+++ :On second thoughts, I have restored the original PROD. This would be improper only if your removal was "an objection to deletion" - if so, let me know, and I will dePROD again and probably AfD. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 11:29, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

21235 +++$+++ VascoAmaral +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21235 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-14 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.295056020E09 +++$+++ Sorry for any incovenience, happy weekend - -- +++$+++ Sorry for any incovenience, happy weekend - --[[User:VascoAmaral|Vasco Amaral]] ([[User talk:VascoAmaral|talk]]) 17:47, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
21236 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21235 +++$+++ 21235 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.295064480E09 +++$+++ No worries. I'm actually surprised nothing has really happened in my classroom at my college yet. I'm the only one who has edited there anonymously.  +++$+++ *No worries. I'm actually surprised nothing has really happened in my classroom at my college yet. I'm the only one who has edited there anonymously. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 20:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
21237 +++$+++ Szyslak +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21235 +++$+++ 21235 +++$+++ 2011-02-05 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.296923340E09 +++$+++ I was just about to remove the image from the article, and you beat me to it! Thanks! <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :I was just about to remove the image from the article, and you beat me to it! Thanks! <font color="green">[[User:Szyslak|szyslak]]</font> (<font color="green">[[User talk:Szyslak|t]]</font>) 08:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

545525 +++$+++ RepublicanJacobite +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545525 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-30 15:52:00 +++$+++ 1.222815120E09 +++$+++ Hello, Tim.  I reverted the edit because it was unreferenced and unencyclop\xe6dic in its tone.  But, yes, I should have been more explicit in my edit summary, and should have left the editor a note about it.  All too often, I get in a hurry while reverting and forget such things.  Clearly, the edit was not mere vandalism.  I was sort of going on auto-pilot. ---<font face=\"Celtic\"> +++$+++ Hello, Tim.  I reverted the edit because it was unreferenced and unencyclopædic in its tone.  But, yes, I should have been more explicit in my edit summary, and should have left the editor a note about it.  All too often, I get in a hurry while reverting and forget such things.  Clearly, the edit was not mere vandalism.  I was sort of going on auto-pilot. ---<font face="Celtic">[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 15:52, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
545526 +++$+++ RepublicanJacobite +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545525 +++$+++ 545525 +++$+++ 2008-09-30 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.222817880E09 +++$+++ Yes, polymath and autodidact both apply to me, which is not bragging.  I attended 5 different universities, pursued more than half-a-dozen degrees, but it has always been the library where I felt at home.  Wikipedia feeds my fascination with many different areas of knowledge, which is why I spend so much time here.  Cheers! ---<font face=\"Celtic\"> +++$+++ :Yes, polymath and autodidact both apply to me, which is not bragging.  I attended 5 different universities, pursued more than half-a-dozen degrees, but it has always been the library where I felt at home.  Wikipedia feeds my fascination with many different areas of knowledge, which is why I spend so much time here.  Cheers! ---<font face="Celtic">[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 16:38, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

283382 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283382 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-18 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.179538440E09 +++$+++ Yeah, she told him where the '''condoms''' were - which was careless talk! (In the cupboard behind the aspirins and the tampax). (BTW, I love you for your comments on Mimi's talk page.)  +++$+++ Yeah, she told him where the '''condoms''' were - which was careless talk! (In the cupboard behind the aspirins and the tampax). (BTW, I love you for your comments on Mimi's talk page.) [[User:Andreasegde|egde]] 18:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
283383 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283382 +++$+++ 283382 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 17:09:00 +++$+++ 1.179619740E09 +++$+++ No, I meant that your comments were truly appreciated, and had nothing to do with murderers. (I was a bit pissed when I wrote it.)  +++$+++ :No, I meant that your comments were truly appreciated, and had nothing to do with murderers. (I was a bit pissed when I wrote it.) [[User:Andreasegde|egde]] 17:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
283384 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283382 +++$+++ 283383 +++$+++ 2007-05-20 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.179718080E09 +++$+++ Change your photo - you look like a [[Psychiatrist|trick-cyclist]] and it's like you are looking into my underpants. \"I'm sorry that I shagged me bird when she was half-asleep\", kind of stuff... :)) Example: \"So... andreasegde... how long have you had the feeling that you contribute in any way at all?\" What does Vera look like, BTW? Tall, muscular and blond, or what? ;))  +++$+++ ::Change your photo - you look like a [[Psychiatrist|trick-cyclist]] and it's like you are looking into my underpants. "I'm sorry that I shagged me bird when she was half-asleep", kind of stuff... :)) Example: "So... andreasegde... how long have you had the feeling that you contribute in any way at all?" What does Vera look like, BTW? Tall, muscular and blond, or what? ;)) [[User:Andreasegde|egde]] 20:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
283385 +++$+++ Ckatz +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283382 +++$+++ 283382 +++$+++ 2007-05-23 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.179964020E09 +++$+++ No problem... good catch on the ''Private Eye'' text. My apologies for not leaving a note for you regarding the change - I was in a bit of a rush. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ :No problem... good catch on the ''Private Eye'' text. My apologies for not leaving a note for you regarding the change - I was in a bit of a rush. Cheers. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 16:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
283386 +++$+++ Ckatz +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283382 +++$+++ 283385 +++$+++ 2007-05-24 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.180070220E09 +++$+++ Hmmm... I'd thought I just restored the ''Shrek'' text, but apparently I accidentally restored the \"Private Eye\" text as well. Sorry about that - it has since been removed by another editor. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ ::Hmmm... I'd thought I just restored the ''Shrek'' text, but apparently I accidentally restored the "Private Eye" text as well. Sorry about that - it has since been removed by another editor. Cheers. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 22:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

545527 +++$+++ Kitty53 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-04 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.223175180E09 +++$+++ Hi, Tim. I noticed you deleted Andi Whaley, a former article here. However, whoever tagged it for deletion did not warn me about the deletion tagging, first. Here's a word of advice: Next time you delete an article, whoever tagged the article for deletion needs to see to it that the creator is warned about it prior to the article's deletion. I hope this advice was helpful! +++$+++ Hi, Tim. I noticed you deleted Andi Whaley, a former article here. However, whoever tagged it for deletion did not warn me about the deletion tagging, first. Here's a word of advice: Next time you delete an article, whoever tagged the article for deletion needs to see to it that the creator is warned about it prior to the article's deletion. I hope this advice was helpful![[User:Kitty53|Kitty53]] ([[User talk:Kitty53|talk]]) 19:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
545528 +++$+++ Kitty53 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545527 +++$+++ 545527 +++$+++ 2008-10-04 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.223180160E09 +++$+++ Oh, okay. Sorry. I guess I didn't understand it. Thanks, Tim! +++$+++ :Oh, okay. Sorry. I guess I didn't understand it. Thanks, Tim![[User:Kitty53|Kitty53]] ([[User talk:Kitty53|talk]]) 21:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

545529 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545529 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-06 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.223288340E09 +++$+++ [[Rs5569]] came up on my periodic check of what links to Tourette syndrome; strange to redlink authors?  Or did I miss something in genetics.   +++$+++ [[Rs5569]] came up on my periodic check of what links to Tourette syndrome; strange to redlink authors?  Or did I miss something in genetics.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
545530 +++$+++ Fnielsen +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545529 +++$+++ 545529 +++$+++ 2008-10-06 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.223312400E09 +++$+++ What is wrong with redlinks? I guess it may have something to do with the everlasting discussion on notability, and some feel that humans are not generally notable... With the erasing of the author links the link to, e.g., Professor Dr. [[Peter Riederer]]. It would have provided some context. &mdash;  +++$+++ : What is wrong with redlinks? I guess it may have something to do with the everlasting discussion on notability, and some feel that humans are not generally notable... With the erasing of the author links the link to, e.g., Professor Dr. [[Peter Riederer]]. It would have provided some context. &mdash; [[User:Fnielsen|fnielsen]] ([[User talk:Fnielsen|talk]]) 10:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

21242 +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-09 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.297238760E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Padayani&diff=prev&oldid=341835867 This] edit was particularly ill advised.  I came across this why helping clearing out the copypaste categories and was a little shocked by this edit.  Although I had the benefit of someone pointing out where it was copied from to me I can't imagine it would have been too hard to find given that the page was linked from in the article.  I know this was some time ago (about a year) and you may not have acted in that way now but, as copyright violations are such a serious issue, I thought it worth dropping you a note, even after all this time, to point out that this was far from the ideal way to deal with a possible copyright violation.  (I've now tagged the article as G12 so in case it's deleted before you read this an IP had replaced the text with \"All content of padayani page was copied from other website. this was a violation of copy right act. Because the page was removed.\" and then you restored about 24Ks worth of copyvio text).  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Padayani&diff=prev&oldid=341835867 This] edit was particularly ill advised.  I came across this why helping clearing out the copypaste categories and was a little shocked by this edit.  Although I had the benefit of someone pointing out where it was copied from to me I can't imagine it would have been too hard to find given that the page was linked from in the article.  I know this was some time ago (about a year) and you may not have acted in that way now but, as copyright violations are such a serious issue, I thought it worth dropping you a note, even after all this time, to point out that this was far from the ideal way to deal with a possible copyright violation.  (I've now tagged the article as G12 so in case it's deleted before you read this an IP had replaced the text with "All content of padayani page was copied from other website. this was a violation of copy right act. Because the page was removed." and then you restored about 24Ks worth of copyvio text). [[User:Dpmuk|Dpmuk]] ([[User talk:Dpmuk|talk]]) 00:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
21243 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21242 +++$+++ 21242 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.297239540E09 +++$+++ Have you notified the IP of a way that any future edits could not be mistaken for vandalism? I do admit to it being my mistake, though.  +++$+++ *Have you notified the IP of a way that any future edits could not be mistaken for vandalism? I do admit to it being my mistake, though. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 00:19, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
21244 +++$+++ Dpmuk +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21242 +++$+++ 21243 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.297239840E09 +++$+++ That IPs only edits were to that article and were a year ago so there seems little point.  I have, however, watchlisted there talk page in case they return.  Sorry if I came across as blaming you too much - I can struggle to write messages like that at times.   +++$+++ **That IPs only edits were to that article and were a year ago so there seems little point.  I have, however, watchlisted there talk page in case they return.  Sorry if I came across as blaming you too much - I can struggle to write messages like that at times.  [[User:Dpmuk|Dpmuk]] ([[User talk:Dpmuk|talk]]) 00:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
21245 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21242 +++$+++ 21244 +++$+++ 2011-02-09 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.297240020E09 +++$+++ The only thing I would suspect is that you immediately told me after you noticed it. Don't worry about it though, I'm fine.  +++$+++ ::*The only thing I would suspect is that you immediately told me after you noticed it. Don't worry about it though, I'm fine. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 00:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

283387 +++$+++ Manboobies +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283387 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-24 16:19:00 +++$+++ 1.180048740E09 +++$+++ No more Michael and the kids. Le sigh. How are you, fluffy boy?-- +++$+++ No more Michael and the kids. Le sigh. How are you, fluffy boy?--[[User:Manboobies|Manboobies]] 16:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
283388 +++$+++ Manboobies +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283387 +++$+++ 283387 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.180334520E09 +++$+++ I'm fantastic. Somewhat under stress from exams. I really should revise but something is stopping me. Fear? -- +++$+++ :I'm fantastic. Somewhat under stress from exams. I really should revise but something is stopping me. Fear? --[[User:Manboobies|Manboobies]] 23:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
283389 +++$+++ Manboobies +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283387 +++$+++ 283387 +++$+++ 2007-06-01 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.180748700E09 +++$+++ No, I don't like Beer. Probably [[Tequilla]].-- +++$+++ :No, I don't like Beer. Probably [[Tequilla]].--[[User:Manboobies|Manboobies]] 18:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

283394 +++$+++ GentlemanGhost +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283394 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-09 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.181445660E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[WP:CSD#Images\/media|Criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->  +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[WP:CSD#Images/media|Criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> [[User:GentlemanGhost|GentlemanGhost]] 20:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
283395 +++$+++ Manboobies +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283394 +++$+++ 283394 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.181459580E09 +++$+++ At least \"the inquisition-like drive to annoy wikipedia's contributors\" bothered to notify you before deleting your images. I noticed one of mine be deleted with zero notice whatsoever today. Would you like to know how to fix it? I can give you a generic thingy majig to shove in there which will make the deletion thing go away. And hopefully the inquisition, too.-- +++$+++ :At least "the inquisition-like drive to annoy wikipedia's contributors" bothered to notify you before deleting your images. I noticed one of mine be deleted with zero notice whatsoever today. Would you like to know how to fix it? I can give you a generic thingy majig to shove in there which will make the deletion thing go away. And hopefully the inquisition, too.--[[User:Manboobies|Manboobies]] 00:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
283396 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283394 +++$+++ 283395 +++$+++ 2007-06-10 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.181499660E09 +++$+++ I've taken to ignoring those warnings. Like white-noise.-- +++$+++ ::I've taken to ignoring those warnings. Like white-noise.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 11:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

21254 +++$+++ 216.93.212.245 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21254 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-27 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.306500540E09 +++$+++ It's not an empty category (well, it is now, because I removed the vandalism the category's creator added to the referenced page), it's a vandalistic template that now no longer contains content.  But it was created, probably by the person of the same name, to promote them at the college they attend.  [[Special:Contributions\/216.93.212.245|216.93.212.245]] ( +++$+++ It's not an empty category (well, it is now, because I removed the vandalism the category's creator added to the referenced page), it's a vandalistic template that now no longer contains content.  But it was created, probably by the person of the same name, to promote them at the college they attend.  [[Special:Contributions/216.93.212.245|216.93.212.245]] ([[User talk:216.93.212.245|talk]]) 05:49, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
21255 +++$+++ 216.93.212.245 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21254 +++$+++ 21254 +++$+++ 2011-05-27 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.306500660E09 +++$+++ OK, whatever works to get rid of the stupid thing.  :)  [[Special:Contributions\/216.93.212.245|216.93.212.245]] ( +++$+++ :OK, whatever works to get rid of the stupid thing.  :)  [[Special:Contributions/216.93.212.245|216.93.212.245]] ([[User talk:216.93.212.245|talk]]) 05:51, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

21256 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21256 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.308548040E09 +++$+++ I also notice there's no banner up above saying \"This page is 141 kilobytes long\". This really confuses me.  +++$+++ I also notice there's no banner up above saying "This page is 141 kilobytes long". This really confuses me. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 22:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
21257 +++$+++ Gurch +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21256 +++$+++ 21256 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.308582240E09 +++$+++ Look at any long page you like, and you'll notice there is no \"This page is X kilobytes long\" on any of them. This is because the message was removed from MediaWiki eight months ago. Apparently, nobody here has noticed this yet.  +++$+++ : Look at any long page you like, and you'll notice there is no "This page is X kilobytes long" on any of them. This is because the message was removed from MediaWiki eight months ago. Apparently, nobody here has noticed this yet. [[User:Gurch|Gurch]] ([[User talk:Gurch|talk]]) 08:04, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

21258 +++$+++ Soap +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21258 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 17:40:00 +++$+++ 1.309999200E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Thank you for all of the work you do here.  You should be an admin, though I suspect if you ran people'd say you don't have enough mainspace edits. <b> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for all of the work you do here.  You should be an admin, though I suspect if you ran people'd say you don't have enough mainspace edits. <b>[[User:Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]][[User talk:Soap|<font color="057602">''Soap''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]]</b> 17:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
21259 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ Mechamind90 +++$+++ 21258 +++$+++ 21258 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310001240E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the compliment. Being an admin though probably requires a little bit more work than I could handle.  +++$+++ *Thanks for the compliment. Being an admin though probably requires a little bit more work than I could handle. [[User:Mechamind90|<font color="#0000FF">mechamind</font>]][[User talk:Mechamind90|<font color="#009900">9</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mechamind90|<font color="#FF0000">0</font>]] 18:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

21260 +++$+++ Cman7792 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-01 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.259658120E09 +++$+++ on the talk page and summary, i stated why this article shouldnt be deleted. please talk about it on the talk page before you consider having it deleted.-- +++$+++ on the talk page and summary, i stated why this article shouldnt be deleted. please talk about it on the talk page before you consider having it deleted.--[[User:Cman7792|Cman7792]] ([[User talk:Cman7792|talk]]) 01:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
21261 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21260 +++$+++ 21260 +++$+++ 2009-12-01 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.259666220E09 +++$+++ Please '''do not''' place your signature in the headings. I have read your arguments and still believe that it fails [[WP:NF]] as it doesn't have any real plot here. You can't use Google as a source, and why in the world would a reader of our encyclopedia have to Google your movie in order to find a source? We believe in [[WP:CITE|in-line citations]] here. Now, I hope not to come across as [[WP:CIVIL|uncivil]] or [[WP:BITE|BITE-ey]], but please read [[Wikipedia:FIRST|these guidelines]] before introducing an article into the mainspace; it covers some of the things an article should include before making it \"live.\" You are free to participate in the AfD for that article. At this time, it is up to the community to decide. \u2014 +++$+++ :Please '''do not''' place your signature in the headings. I have read your arguments and still believe that it fails [[WP:NF]] as it doesn't have any real plot here. You can't use Google as a source, and why in the world would a reader of our encyclopedia have to Google your movie in order to find a source? We believe in [[WP:CITE|in-line citations]] here. Now, I hope not to come across as [[WP:CIVIL|uncivil]] or [[WP:BITE|BITE-ey]], but please read [[Wikipedia:FIRST|these guidelines]] before introducing an article into the mainspace; it covers some of the things an article should include before making it "live." You are free to participate in the AfD for that article. At this time, it is up to the community to decide. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 03:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

571522 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571522 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-15 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.174027320E09 +++$+++ I'm on a sort of quest to clear out old and broken categories, and one of yours ([[:Category:AGH MY EYES]]) showed up. I was going to remove it (And the other redlinks ones), but I'll leave that decision to you if you want to.  +++$+++ I'm on a sort of quest to clear out old and broken categories, and one of yours ([[:Category:AGH MY EYES]]) showed up. I was going to remove it (And the other redlinks ones), but I'll leave that decision to you if you want to. [[User:Logical2u|Logical2u]]<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Logical2u|Review me!]]</sub> 23:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
571523 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571522 +++$+++ 571522 +++$+++ 2007-03-17 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.174151340E09 +++$+++ I'm sure there's a way to avoid them using .css files, but I don't have mine set up in such a way.  +++$+++ :I'm sure there's a way to avoid them using .css files, but I don't have mine set up in such a way. [[User:Logical2u|Logical2u]]<sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Logical2u|Review me!]]</sub> 10:09, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

21262 +++$+++ 217.150.130.180 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21262 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-01 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.259699760E09 +++$+++ dear Duncan\/ESanchez013, thanks for the help, now i'm totally new to wiki and wikipedia, so please help me with that consent letter. i should write to system3 that they should write a letter to wikipedia, right? what license should they use? they created the game but screenshots are different ''product''. [[Special:Contributions\/217.150.130.180|217.150.130.180]] ( +++$+++ dear Duncan/ESanchez013, thanks for the help, now i'm totally new to wiki and wikipedia, so please help me with that consent letter. i should write to system3 that they should write a letter to wikipedia, right? what license should they use? they created the game but screenshots are different ''product''. [[Special:Contributions/217.150.130.180|217.150.130.180]] ([[User talk:217.150.130.180|talk]]) 12:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
21263 +++$+++ Phpmoli +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21262 +++$+++ 21262 +++$+++ 2009-12-01 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.259715600E09 +++$+++ Hi, here an admin said that ''[[User_talk:Duncan\/Archive_6#image_upload_decline|He will need to formally license the image, following the format at WP:CONSENT.]]'' but fair-use says ''[[Screenshot#Copyright_issues|Regardless of copyright, screenshots may still be legally used under the principle of fair use in the U.S. or fair dealing and similar laws in other countries.]]'' Do we need to email that guy again apart the email we already got? -- +++$+++ :Hi, here an admin said that ''[[User_talk:Duncan/Archive_6#image_upload_decline|He will need to formally license the image, following the format at WP:CONSENT.]]'' but fair-use says ''[[Screenshot#Copyright_issues|Regardless of copyright, screenshots may still be legally used under the principle of fair use in the U.S. or fair dealing and similar laws in other countries.]]'' Do we need to email that guy again apart the email we already got? --[[User_talk:Phpmoli|phpmoli]] 17:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
21264 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21262 +++$+++ 21263 +++$+++ 2009-12-02 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.259766780E09 +++$+++ Hmmm. I guess we can upload it under fair use. \u2014 +++$+++ ::Hmmm. I guess we can upload it under fair use. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 07:13, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
21265 +++$+++ Phpmoli +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21262 +++$+++ 21264 +++$+++ 2009-12-04 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.259963160E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks, what's the procedure, do we need to make a request again or can we alter the previous request? -- +++$+++ :::Ok, thanks, what's the procedure, do we need to make a request again or can we alter the previous request? --[[User_talk:Phpmoli|phpmoli]] 13:46, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
21266 +++$+++ Phpmoli +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21262 +++$+++ 21265 +++$+++ 2009-12-07 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.260228780E09 +++$+++ {{tlx|adminhelp}} this is pointless. you can upload any copyrighted text but not fair-use images? i had massive enthusiasm to help edit wikipedia, i even read nearly all help pages. all i got now is a huge wait sign blinking that i'm waiting for years to give go. no. i stop. it was useless and pointless to create an account. i deeply sorry for the time i've spent with wikipedia. admins read this as you [[User_talk:Duncan\/Archive_6#image_upload_decline|were]] took part in this -- +++$+++ :::: {{tlx|adminhelp}} this is pointless. you can upload any copyrighted text but not fair-use images? i had massive enthusiasm to help edit wikipedia, i even read nearly all help pages. all i got now is a huge wait sign blinking that i'm waiting for years to give go. no. i stop. it was useless and pointless to create an account. i deeply sorry for the time i've spent with wikipedia. admins read this as you [[User_talk:Duncan/Archive_6#image_upload_decline|were]] took part in this --[[User_talk:Phpmoli|phpmoli]] 15:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

527832 +++$+++ Bladestorm +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-15 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.181953740E09 +++$+++ In short, I'm not saying the block was bad. I'm just saying that citing an essay to support a block is always a bad idea.  +++$+++ In short, I'm not saying the block was bad. I'm just saying that citing an essay to support a block is always a bad idea. [[User:Bladestorm|Bladestorm]] 17:29, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
527833 +++$+++ El C +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527832 +++$+++ 527832 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.181954100E09 +++$+++ ''(copied from ANI by Daniel at 07:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC))'' He didn't cite it (i.e. as per [[WP:TE]]); he linked it. Big difference.  +++$+++ :''(copied from ANI by Daniel at 07:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC))'' He didn't cite it (i.e. as per [[WP:TE]]); he linked it. Big difference. [[User:El C|El_C]] 17:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
527834 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527832 +++$+++ 527832 +++$+++ 2007-06-15 22:57:00 +++$+++ 1.181973420E09 +++$+++ True, and in any case, [[WP:TE|tendentious editing]] is a subset of [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]], a widely accepted guideline the violation of which is grounds for blocking. I think linking the essay was just an attempt to be specific about the subtype of disruptiveness involved. For what it's worth, 2 unblock requests by Fourdee have since been declined, the second by me. ''' +++$+++ :True, and in any case, [[WP:TE|tendentious editing]] is a subset of [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]], a widely accepted guideline the violation of which is grounds for blocking. I think linking the essay was just an attempt to be specific about the subtype of disruptiveness involved. For what it's worth, 2 unblock requests by Fourdee have since been declined, the second by me. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 22:57, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
527835 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527832 +++$+++ 527834 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 07:58:00 +++$+++ 1.182005880E09 +++$+++ For the record, I agree with both El C and MastCell above. ''' +++$+++ ::For the record, I agree with both El C and MastCell above. '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 07:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

283410 +++$+++ 219.90.184.224 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283410 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-08 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.183934640E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:219.90.184.224|219.90.184.224]] 15:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
283411 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283410 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-08 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.183961760E09 +++$+++ Goodness me, ask ANYONE else. You're wrong, live with it.-- +++$+++ ::::Goodness me, ask ANYONE else. You're wrong, live with it.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 23:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

545555 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545555 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-18 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.224317100E09 +++$+++ In case you want a little challenge :-)  PMID 15721825 (a review) has a decent overview of PANDAS under \"Neuroimmunology\".  Even though \"I get it\", it's tough for me to write about; specifically, I find it very hard to paraphrase the tecno-mumbo-jumbo.   +++$+++ In case you want a little challenge :-)  PMID 15721825 (a review) has a decent overview of PANDAS under "Neuroimmunology".  Even though "I get it", it's tough for me to write about; specifically, I find it very hard to paraphrase the tecno-mumbo-jumbo.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
545556 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545555 +++$+++ 545555 +++$+++ 2008-10-18 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.224317220E09 +++$+++ Oh, and check out the figure on page 153.  Maybe some graphics genius could make something for the TS article :-)   +++$+++ : Oh, and check out the figure on page 153.  Maybe some graphics genius could make something for the TS article :-)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:07, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
545557 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545555 +++$+++ 545556 +++$+++ 2008-10-18 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.224331500E09 +++$+++ Updated confirmation of the trend at PMID 18823914 (primary study, but in line with review).   +++$+++ :: Updated confirmation of the trend at PMID 18823914 (primary study, but in line with review).  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 05:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

283412 +++$+++ 219.90.210.14 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283412 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-11 15:31:00 +++$+++ 1.184193060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:219.90.210.14|219.90.210.14]] 15:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
283413 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283412 +++$+++ 283412 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.184215020E09 +++$+++ Wouldn't claim to own the article - in fact, I forgot I created it - but I will say opinion, as you will learn, has NO place here. Rudness and stubborness - to an extent - do. Ask an admin.-- +++$+++ :Wouldn't claim to own the article - in fact, I forgot I created it - but I will say opinion, as you will learn, has NO place here. Rudness and stubborness - to an extent - do. Ask an admin.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 21:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

21269 +++$+++ Decepticon Shockwave +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-02 13:30:00 +++$+++ 1.259789400E09 +++$+++ Obvious sock of [[User:Editor XXV]]. That guy has a rather bizarre modus operandi: tagging his own socks immediately after creating them, for instance. Not banned yet, but I'm working on it. -- +++$+++ Obvious sock of [[User:Editor XXV]]. That guy has a rather bizarre modus operandi: tagging his own socks immediately after creating them, for instance. Not banned yet, but I'm working on it. --[[User:Decepticon Shockwave|Decepticon Shockwave]], signing off. ([[User talk:Decepticon Shockwave|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Decepticon Shockwave|contributions]]) 13:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
21270 +++$+++ Decepticon Shockwave +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21269 +++$+++ 21269 +++$+++ 2009-12-02 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.259789520E09 +++$+++ Oh, and this one was a sleeper. My guess is he was trying to wait out the 4-day limit before you can become autoconfirmed, but got impatient. -- +++$+++ :Oh, and this one was a sleeper. My guess is he was trying to wait out the 4-day limit before you can become autoconfirmed, but got impatient. --[[User:Decepticon Shockwave|Decepticon Shockwave]], signing off. ([[User talk:Decepticon Shockwave|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Decepticon Shockwave|contributions]]) 13:32, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

21271 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-02 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.259789820E09 +++$+++ What a guy. Well, I'm sure he has more sleepers somewhere; I think after this, we have enough to take him to AIV or request a CU on his accounts. \u2014 +++$+++ What a guy. Well, I'm sure he has more sleepers somewhere; I think after this, we have enough to take him to AIV or request a CU on his accounts. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 13:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
21272 +++$+++ Decepticon Shockwave +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21271 +++$+++ 21271 +++$+++ 2009-12-02 13:41:00 +++$+++ 1.259790060E09 +++$+++ There already was a CU. (Came out positive, shocking, I know.) Unfortunately, he's operating from a dynamic IP, and the range he cycles through is huge and can only be blocked for a short time. I'm trying to get him community banned. -- +++$+++ :There already was a CU. (Came out positive, shocking, I know.) Unfortunately, he's operating from a dynamic IP, and the range he cycles through is huge and can only be blocked for a short time. I'm trying to get him community banned. --[[User:Decepticon Shockwave|Decepticon Shockwave]], signing off. ([[User talk:Decepticon Shockwave|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Decepticon Shockwave|contributions]]) 13:41, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
21273 +++$+++ Thejadefalcon +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21271 +++$+++ 21272 +++$+++ 2009-12-02 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.259795940E09 +++$+++ Oh, bugger, I missed him ''again''. Thanks for the revert, Duncan. It's always nice to know one's a sockpuppeteer. xD Is there any way I can help with the community ban? --<font color=\"#009000\"> +++$+++ ::Oh, bugger, I missed him ''again''. Thanks for the revert, Duncan. It's always nice to know one's a sockpuppeteer. xD Is there any way I can help with the community ban? --<font color="#009000">[[User:Thejadefalcon|Thejadefalcon]]</font><font color="#03C03C">[[User talk:Thejadefalcon|<sup>''Sing your song''</sup>]]</font><font color="#00A550">[[Special:Contributions/Thejadefalcon|<sub>''The bird's seeds''</sub>]]</font> 15:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
21274 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21271 +++$+++ 21273 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.259829120E09 +++$+++ There's currently a discussion on [[WP:ANI#User:Editor XXV]]; I'm sure we could give our opinion in the matter there. \u2014 +++$+++ :::There's currently a discussion on [[WP:ANI#User:Editor XXV]]; I'm sure we could give our opinion in the matter there. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 00:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
21275 +++$+++ Thejadefalcon +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21271 +++$+++ 21274 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.259829540E09 +++$+++ Already commented. May I say how much I hate AN\/I as I told xeno [[User talk:Xeno#AN.2FI|here]]? --<font color=\"#009000\"> +++$+++ ::::Already commented. May I say how much I hate AN/I as I told xeno [[User talk:Xeno#AN.2FI|here]]? --<font color="#009000">[[User:Thejadefalcon|Thejadefalcon]]</font><font color="#03C03C">[[User talk:Thejadefalcon|<sup>''Sing your song''</sup>]]</font><font color="#00A550">[[Special:Contributions/Thejadefalcon|<sub>''The bird's seeds''</sub>]]</font> 00:39, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

309380 +++$+++ Aa77zz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-21 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.256142120E09 +++$+++ Dave, I know it isn't your area - but I would like your advice. I have detected a copyvio on [[Niger Inland Delta]] where the text is lifted directly from the World Wildlife page. I've put a note on the talk page. How should I procede? Should I simply delete the contributions by user PimRijkee?  +++$+++ Dave, I know it isn't your area - but I would like your advice. I have detected a copyvio on [[Niger Inland Delta]] where the text is lifted directly from the World Wildlife page. I've put a note on the talk page. How should I procede? Should I simply delete the contributions by user PimRijkee? [[User:Aa77zz|Aa77zz]] ([[User talk:Aa77zz|talk]]) 09:22, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
309381 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.256181480E09 +++$+++ Sorry I was out when this came up, you seem to be making good progress so far and the response on your talk page looks promising. Also good work with finding the ecology section text taken from a ESA pdf. Given the good faith response to the first finding presumably PimRijkee will take that on board as well, and obviously we'd expect Pim's cooperation to ensure there aren't any other interim or unintentional copies of text that need to be rephrased. Hope that gets sorted out amicably, let me know if you'd like me to comment or advise. Thanks for the good work,  +++$+++ :Sorry I was out when this came up, you seem to be making good progress so far and the response on your talk page looks promising. Also good work with finding the ecology section text taken from a ESA pdf. Given the good faith response to the first finding presumably PimRijkee will take that on board as well, and obviously we'd expect Pim's cooperation to ensure there aren't any other interim or unintentional copies of text that need to be rephrased. Hope that gets sorted out amicably, let me know if you'd like me to comment or advise. Thanks for the good work, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 20:18, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
309382 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309381 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.256518200E09 +++$+++ Nfitz, please stop trying to dig a hole for yourself. If you want content kept in articles, provide [[WP:V|verification]] or the information will be removed in accordance that policy. Attacking other editors for your failure to follow policy is not a good move. . .  +++$+++ ::Nfitz, please stop trying to dig a hole for yourself. If you want content kept in articles, provide [[WP:V|verification]] or the information will be removed in accordance that policy. Attacking other editors for your failure to follow policy is not a good move. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 17:50, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
309383 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.256518920E09 +++$+++ But that's what's so bizarre about this!  I've done everything possible to address the lack of verification on both the [[Daniel Greenberg]] and [[Sudbury School]] page as they have arisen.  The user in question ignores the many edits that have been made to fix the pages, and simply focuses on a couple of small disputes.  I worked through yesterday and added the references that were causing all the strife on [[Sudbury School]] which no one seems to have any issue with now that they are done ... and it turns out they were from a source already referenced twice on the same page.  And I've attempted to do the same with the [[Daniel Greenberg]] page; which obviously still needs some work, however I've continued to work in good faith, and yet have been subjected to various personal attacks by the editor in question, with very clear violations of [[WP:NPA]], [[WP:CIVIL]], and [[WP:FAITH]].  I certainly don't think pointing out to another editor that they are violating Wikipedia policies is attacking them! If editors would work together on the talk page to discuss through disputes, this project would go a lot smoother.  +++$+++ * But that's what's so bizarre about this!  I've done everything possible to address the lack of verification on both the [[Daniel Greenberg]] and [[Sudbury School]] page as they have arisen.  The user in question ignores the many edits that have been made to fix the pages, and simply focuses on a couple of small disputes.  I worked through yesterday and added the references that were causing all the strife on [[Sudbury School]] which no one seems to have any issue with now that they are done ... and it turns out they were from a source already referenced twice on the same page.  And I've attempted to do the same with the [[Daniel Greenberg]] page; which obviously still needs some work, however I've continued to work in good faith, and yet have been subjected to various personal attacks by the editor in question, with very clear violations of [[WP:NPA]], [[WP:CIVIL]], and [[WP:FAITH]].  I certainly don't think pointing out to another editor that they are violating Wikipedia policies is attacking them! If editors would work together on the talk page to discuss through disputes, this project would go a lot smoother. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 18:02, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
309384 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309383 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.256519460E09 +++$+++ And I just saw your note on a couple of other pages.  I see no text in any of these disputes that is tagged for a lack of verification. Perhaps I'm missing something?  I appreciate your intervention in this dispute ... I think we would both benefit from other points of view.  +++$+++ ** And I just saw your note on a couple of other pages.  I see no text in any of these disputes that is tagged for a lack of verification. Perhaps I'm missing something?  I appreciate your intervention in this dispute ... I think we would both benefit from other points of view. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 18:11, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
309385 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309384 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.256521020E09 +++$+++ Glad to hear it, as you say discussion and provision of verification is the way forward. Your complaints about civility appeared from my brief inspection both unjustified and an unnecessary diversion, a focus on meeting content policies is much better. . .  +++$+++ :::Glad to hear it, as you say discussion and provision of verification is the way forward. Your complaints about civility appeared from my brief inspection both unjustified and an unnecessary diversion, a focus on meeting content policies is much better. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:37, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
309386 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309385 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.256521800E09 +++$+++ Every talk post the user in question makes has all these extra unnecessary and agressive adjectives.  And the very first post he made on my talk page on the subject since August, wasn't a \"hey - let's discuss this ...\", it was a warning template threatening I be banned!  At the same time he is convinced that the subject in question isn't notable, but refuses to the logical course of AfD (though I guess he has now gone to a proper merger discussion, which is another alternative ...).  +++$+++ ::::Every talk post the user in question makes has all these extra unnecessary and agressive adjectives.  And the very first post he made on my talk page on the subject since August, wasn't a "hey - let's discuss this ...", it was a warning template threatening I be banned!  At the same time he is convinced that the subject in question isn't notable, but refuses to the logical course of AfD (though I guess he has now gone to a proper merger discussion, which is another alternative ...). [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 18:50, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
309387 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.256713800E09 +++$+++ Here's another example of the lack of civility I previously noted; did you see the follow-up response to your comment http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Hrafn&diff=321980335&oldid=321972036 ?  I've never seen an editor behave in this manner before. Should I be reporting stuff like this to [[WP:ANB]]?  +++$+++ * Here's another example of the lack of civility I previously noted; did you see the follow-up response to your comment http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hrafn&diff=321980335&oldid=321972036 ?  I've never seen an editor behave in this manner before. Should I be reporting stuff like this to [[WP:ANB]]? [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 00:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
309388 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309387 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.256743680E09 +++$+++ This came up because your own conduct looked pretty abrasive, so [[WP:NAM]] seems appropriate, and please accept that other opinions about an issue can be legitimate. This seems to me to essentially be a [[WP:EQ]] issue, and if you really must report it elsewhere then [[WP:WQA]] would be more appropriate, but in my opinion the time would be better spent in improving the relevant articles. Thanks for the heads-up, having had a look at the issue under dispute I've commented there. . .  +++$+++ ::This came up because your own conduct looked pretty abrasive, so [[WP:NAM]] seems appropriate, and please accept that other opinions about an issue can be legitimate. This seems to me to essentially be a [[WP:EQ]] issue, and if you really must report it elsewhere then [[WP:WQA]] would be more appropriate, but in my opinion the time would be better spent in improving the relevant articles. Thanks for the heads-up, having had a look at the issue under dispute I've commented there. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 08:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
309389 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309388 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.256794200E09 +++$+++ I may have made the mistake early on in reacting to his earlier taunts in kind.  That was a mistake, that I think I've mostly avoided since then.  I'm really not used to such editors, I've found most to be constructive in the past. And I'd much rather spend my time improving the article, rather than to have to spend time defending what seems like a pretty obvious pass of [[WP:N]] in my mind. I still think this is better served at AfD, if it is really notability we are looking at here.  +++$+++ :::I may have made the mistake early on in reacting to his earlier taunts in kind.  That was a mistake, that I think I've mostly avoided since then.  I'm really not used to such editors, I've found most to be constructive in the past. And I'd much rather spend my time improving the article, rather than to have to spend time defending what seems like a pretty obvious pass of [[WP:N]] in my mind. I still think this is better served at AfD, if it is really notability we are looking at here. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 22:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
309390 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309389 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.256798700E09 +++$+++ Hrafn tends to be pretty forceful about policies such as [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NOTE]], and he also tends to have good judgement about them. In my opinion, last I looked, more in the way of reliable third party sources would be needed to survive AfD, and my recommendation would be a merge and redirect rather than just deleting the article. A merge and redirect leaves open the possibility of adding such sources to the main article, and then by agreement following [[WP:SUMMARY]] to split off the information into a suitably well supported article replacing the redirect. Better to put energies into finding those sources now rather than putting time into the AfD process, but that's just my opinion. . .  +++$+++ ::::Hrafn tends to be pretty forceful about policies such as [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NOTE]], and he also tends to have good judgement about them. In my opinion, last I looked, more in the way of reliable third party sources would be needed to survive AfD, and my recommendation would be a merge and redirect rather than just deleting the article. A merge and redirect leaves open the possibility of adding such sources to the main article, and then by agreement following [[WP:SUMMARY]] to split off the information into a suitably well supported article replacing the redirect. Better to put energies into finding those sources now rather than putting time into the AfD process, but that's just my opinion. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 23:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
309391 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309389 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.257248820E09 +++$+++ On the issue itself, you may well be right ... though it does seem bizarre that a well-published writer isn't notable, but 50,000 footballers with far less 3rd party sources and media references are ... I'm a little confused on what a reasonable source is.  There's reference after reference on him in the popular media (particularly the NY Times and Boston Globe), and a dozen or so in scholarly journals and published books, that I can find.  +++$+++ ::::On the issue itself, you may well be right ... though it does seem bizarre that a well-published writer isn't notable, but 50,000 footballers with far less 3rd party sources and media references are ... I'm a little confused on what a reasonable source is.  There's reference after reference on him in the popular media (particularly the NY Times and Boston Globe), and a dozen or so in scholarly journals and published books, that I can find. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 03:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
309392 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309391 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.257252240E09 +++$+++ Not \"shooting first, and asking questions later\"? '''ROFLMAO!''' I would strongly suggest that Nfitz review the edit summary of [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Daniel_Greenberg&diff=prev&oldid=310534926 this edit], which (as far as I can remember) is our first interaction, in which he ''most emphatically'' came out shooting. That I would [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3ADaniel_Greenberg&action=historysubmit&diff=310536769&oldid=299254451 shoot back], pointing out that he was shooting blanks (pun intended), is an entirely predictable consequence. I would strongly recommend that Nfitz remember the [[Ethic of reciprocity|Golden Rule]], and not himself come out shooting, if he does not want a similar response, or ''at the very least'' check out his ground first, to make sure his 'shots' have some validity. Opening gambits making wild accusations of violation of non-applicable guidelines ''do not'' endear him to his potential correspondents.  <font face=\"Antiqua, serif\">'' +++$+++ :::::Not "shooting first, and asking questions later"? '''ROFLMAO!''' I would strongly suggest that Nfitz review the edit summary of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Greenberg&diff=prev&oldid=310534926 this edit], which (as far as I can remember) is our first interaction, in which he ''most emphatically'' came out shooting. That I would [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ADaniel_Greenberg&action=historysubmit&diff=310536769&oldid=299254451 shoot back], pointing out that he was shooting blanks (pun intended), is an entirely predictable consequence. I would strongly recommend that Nfitz remember the [[Ethic of reciprocity|Golden Rule]], and not himself come out shooting, if he does not want a similar response, or ''at the very least'' check out his ground first, to make sure his 'shots' have some validity. Opening gambits making wild accusations of violation of non-applicable guidelines ''do not'' endear him to his potential correspondents.  <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub><sup>''('''[[M:Precisionism|P]]''')</sup></font> 04:44, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
309393 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309392 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.257292200E09 +++$+++ [[Just So Stories|Just so]], to both of you. Deriding or complaining about other editors is a waste of time, the way to retain an article of dubious notability is to provide [[WP:V|verification]] from reliable third party sources, not just a list of published books. Good luck to all, .  +++$+++ ::::::[[Just So Stories|Just so]], to both of you. Deriding or complaining about other editors is a waste of time, the way to retain an article of dubious notability is to provide [[WP:V|verification]] from reliable third party sources, not just a list of published books. Good luck to all, . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 15:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
309394 +++$+++ Nfitz +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309391 +++$+++ 2009-11-04 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.257326700E09 +++$+++ How there anything at all in my edit?  I simply restored the page, asserted notablity, and asked the user not to leave the page blank ... there was no ill will or intent in that; perhaps leaving it blank was not the correct WikiTerm.  I'd note however that the use of terms such as '''ROFLMAO!'''  is insulting, demeaning, bordering on a personal attack, and a violation of [[WP:CIVIL]]. [[User:Hrafn]] is the most consistently rude and uncivil editor I have ever encountered in this project!  As far as I'm concerned users that continually display such incivility are a liability to the project and should be permanently banned! Sorry to put this on your talk page Dave ... I'm not sure I've ever been WikiHounded before!  +++$+++ :::::How there anything at all in my edit?  I simply restored the page, asserted notablity, and asked the user not to leave the page blank ... there was no ill will or intent in that; perhaps leaving it blank was not the correct WikiTerm.  I'd note however that the use of terms such as '''ROFLMAO!'''  is insulting, demeaning, bordering on a personal attack, and a violation of [[WP:CIVIL]]. [[User:Hrafn]] is the most consistently rude and uncivil editor I have ever encountered in this project!  As far as I'm concerned users that continually display such incivility are a liability to the project and should be permanently banned! Sorry to put this on your talk page Dave ... I'm not sure I've ever been WikiHounded before! [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 01:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
309395 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309380 +++$+++ 309394 +++$+++ 2009-11-04 09:51:00 +++$+++ 1.257357060E09 +++$+++ I get the impression that neither of you realises how much you're upsetting the other, and in trying to express that you're both making the relationship worse rather than better. Agree that ROFLMAO is impolite and better not said, but note that WP:CIVIL also requires \"Do not ignore the positions and conclusions of others.\" Dismissing legitimate concerns as wikilawyering is also impolite, and while Hrafn was perhaps expressing undue scepticism when commenting about the improbability of a sudden burst of progress after four years of inadequate evidence of notability, Nfitz seems to me to have been attacking in response, and persisting in bare assertions of notability without putting forward sourced evidence to convince other editors. Note the plural. If the article is to be kept separate rather than merged into the school article, the issue should be resolved on the relevant article talk pages on the basis of evidence demonstrating independent notability: last I looked that evidence appeared to be lacking, and that should be the focus of attention of those wanting to keep a separate bio. Hrafn is entitled to critically examine claims in relation to agreed guidelines and policies, that in itself should not be taken as an attack. Doing so politely with a conscious effort to avoid any sarcasm, intended or not, should help to improve relationships rather than diverting into arguments about the person rather the article. Which is what caught my attention in the first place. . .  +++$+++ ::::::I get the impression that neither of you realises how much you're upsetting the other, and in trying to express that you're both making the relationship worse rather than better. Agree that ROFLMAO is impolite and better not said, but note that WP:CIVIL also requires "Do not ignore the positions and conclusions of others." Dismissing legitimate concerns as wikilawyering is also impolite, and while Hrafn was perhaps expressing undue scepticism when commenting about the improbability of a sudden burst of progress after four years of inadequate evidence of notability, Nfitz seems to me to have been attacking in response, and persisting in bare assertions of notability without putting forward sourced evidence to convince other editors. Note the plural. If the article is to be kept separate rather than merged into the school article, the issue should be resolved on the relevant article talk pages on the basis of evidence demonstrating independent notability: last I looked that evidence appeared to be lacking, and that should be the focus of attention of those wanting to keep a separate bio. Hrafn is entitled to critically examine claims in relation to agreed guidelines and policies, that in itself should not be taken as an attack. Doing so politely with a conscious effort to avoid any sarcasm, intended or not, should help to improve relationships rather than diverting into arguments about the person rather the article. Which is what caught my attention in the first place. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

545562 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545562 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-17 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.224309000E09 +++$+++ You've got mail. -- +++$+++ You've got mail. --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 22:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
545563 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545562 +++$+++ 545562 +++$+++ 2008-10-21 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.224651420E09 +++$+++ Do you think you could read and correct the paper this week, or will it be next week? Just so I have an idea about timing, it's fine either way. -- +++$+++ :Do you think you could read and correct the paper this week, or will it be next week? Just so I have an idea about timing, it's fine either way. --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 21:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
545564 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545562 +++$+++ 545563 +++$+++ 2008-10-21 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.224655200E09 +++$+++ No problem, your other work definitely has priority, I just like to know so I can plan my own stuff. I'll be looking forward to it for sometime next week then. Thanks and good luck with the other papers! -- +++$+++ ::No problem, your other work definitely has priority, I just like to know so I can plan my own stuff. I'll be looking forward to it for sometime next week then. Thanks and good luck with the other papers! --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 23:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

585825 +++$+++ Seth Whales +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-20 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.214014080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for giving me the Rollback facility, as I say, I will not use it very often...that is why I will never Rfa...thanks again.  +++$+++ Thanks for giving me the Rollback facility, as I say, I will not use it very often...that is why I will never Rfa...thanks again. [[User:Seth Whales|Seth Whales]] ([[User talk:Seth Whales|talk]]) 19:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
585826 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 585825 +++$+++ 585825 +++$+++ 2008-06-20 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.214014200E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Don't worry about not using it that often: as long as you use it only to revert vandalism, and not to revert good-faith edits or to revert-war, you'll be fine. For practice, you may want to see [[Wikipedia:New admin school\/Rollback]]. Good luck.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. Don't worry about not using it that often: as long as you use it only to revert vandalism, and not to revert good-faith edits or to revert-war, you'll be fine. For practice, you may want to see [[Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback]]. Good luck. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

21276 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-03 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.259829840E09 +++$+++ I agree. I'm on a MiFi card and it takes me '''forever''' to load that page. \u2014 +++$+++ I agree. I'm on a MiFi card and it takes me '''forever''' to load that page. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 00:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
21277 +++$+++ Thejadefalcon +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21276 +++$+++ 21276 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.259830140E09 +++$+++ Ow. It took me a while even with a proper, wired connection. --<font color=\"#009000\"> +++$+++ :Ow. It took me a while even with a proper, wired connection. --<font color="#009000">[[User:Thejadefalcon|Thejadefalcon]]</font><font color="#03C03C">[[User talk:Thejadefalcon|<sup>''Sing your song''</sup>]]</font><font color="#00A550">[[Special:Contributions/Thejadefalcon|<sub>''The bird's seeds''</sub>]]</font> 00:49, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
21278 +++$+++ Decepticon Shockwave +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21276 +++$+++ 21277 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.259892060E09 +++$+++ Really? I get it instantly. -- +++$+++ ::Really? I get it instantly. --[[User:Decepticon Shockwave|Decepticon Shockwave]], signing off. ([[User talk:Decepticon Shockwave|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Decepticon Shockwave|contributions]]) 18:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
21279 +++$+++ Thejadefalcon +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21276 +++$+++ 21278 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.259892420E09 +++$+++ Right now, it varies every time I go there. (shrugs) Maybe I just have too many windows open. --<font color=\"#009000\"> +++$+++ :::Right now, it varies every time I go there. (shrugs) Maybe I just have too many windows open. --<font color="#009000">[[User:Thejadefalcon|Thejadefalcon]]</font><font color="#03C03C">[[User talk:Thejadefalcon|<sup>''Sing your song''</sup>]]</font><font color="#00A550">[[Special:Contributions/Thejadefalcon|<sub>''The bird's seeds''</sub>]]</font> 18:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
21280 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21276 +++$+++ 21279 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.259913540E09 +++$+++ Yeah. I also have a slow machine (Vista) on top of it all, so I don't always get it instantly. \u2014 +++$+++ ::::Yeah. I also have a slow machine (Vista) on top of it all, so I don't always get it instantly. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 23:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
21281 +++$+++ Thejadefalcon +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21276 +++$+++ 21280 +++$+++ 2009-12-04 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.259913660E09 +++$+++ You bought Vista? Excuse me while I facepalm. (facepalm) There, all done. :P --<font color=\"#009000\"> +++$+++ :::::You bought Vista? Excuse me while I facepalm. (facepalm) There, all done. :P --<font color="#009000">[[User:Thejadefalcon|Thejadefalcon]]</font><font color="#03C03C">[[User talk:Thejadefalcon|<sup>''Sing your song''</sup>]]</font><font color="#00A550">[[Special:Contributions/Thejadefalcon|<sub>''The bird's seeds''</sub>]]</font> 00:01, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

545567 +++$+++ Deli nk +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545567 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-21 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.224642900E09 +++$+++ Also, can I ask you a favor?  Could you please take a look at [[calorad]] sometime?  It seems quite spammy to me, and I've tried a little to cleanup it up, but the science is a bit beyond what I know and much of my edits have been reverted.  It could really use the help of someone with a good understanding of biochemstry\/biology\/medicine and of Wikipedia's quality standards. Thank you.   +++$+++ Also, can I ask you a favor?  Could you please take a look at [[calorad]] sometime?  It seems quite spammy to me, and I've tried a little to cleanup it up, but the science is a bit beyond what I know and much of my edits have been reverted.  It could really use the help of someone with a good understanding of biochemstry/biology/medicine and of Wikipedia's quality standards. Thank you.  [[User:Deli nk|Deli nk]] ([[User talk:Deli nk|talk]]) 19:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
545568 +++$+++ Deli nk +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545567 +++$+++ 545567 +++$+++ 2008-10-22 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.224707520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking a look.  +++$+++ :Thanks for taking a look. [[User:Deli nk|Deli nk]] ([[User talk:Deli nk|talk]]) 13:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

21282 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21282 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-04 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.259913900E09 +++$+++ [[LOL]] Yes. The whole Aero and window-flip (plus the insistent salesperson) made it seem oh-so-very cool. But, I have learned my lesson: do not buy hastily-coded operating systems. [[Windows 7]], anyone? :P \u2014 +++$+++ [[LOL]] Yes. The whole Aero and window-flip (plus the insistent salesperson) made it seem oh-so-very cool. But, I have learned my lesson: do not buy hastily-coded operating systems. [[Windows 7]], anyone? :P —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 00:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
21283 +++$+++ Thejadefalcon +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21282 +++$+++ 21282 +++$+++ 2009-12-04 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.259914500E09 +++$+++ I've heard mixed on that. I actually asked for my new PC specifically to ''not have Vista''. xD Of course, the XP was stolen and the shop has closed. (rageface) --<font color=\"#009000\"> +++$+++ :I've heard mixed on that. I actually asked for my new PC specifically to ''not have Vista''. xD Of course, the XP was stolen and the shop has closed. (rageface) --<font color="#009000">[[User:Thejadefalcon|Thejadefalcon]]</font><font color="#03C03C">[[User talk:Thejadefalcon|<sup>''Sing your song''</sup>]]</font><font color="#00A550">[[Special:Contributions/Thejadefalcon|<sub>''The bird's seeds''</sub>]]</font> 00:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
21284 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21282 +++$+++ 21283 +++$+++ 2009-12-04 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.259936340E09 +++$+++ Well, I'll wait just a few more months and I may cave :-D. \u2014 +++$+++ ::Well, I'll wait just a few more months and I may cave :-D. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 06:19, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
21285 +++$+++ Thejadefalcon +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21282 +++$+++ 21284 +++$+++ 2009-12-04 11:59:00 +++$+++ 1.259956740E09 +++$+++ (looks at your page history) ... err... what the hell was that IP's poetry about? --<font color=\"#009000\"> +++$+++ :::(looks at your page history) ... err... what the hell was that IP's poetry about? --<font color="#009000">[[User:Thejadefalcon|Thejadefalcon]]</font><font color="#03C03C">[[User talk:Thejadefalcon|<sup>''Sing your song''</sup>]]</font><font color="#00A550">[[Special:Contributions/Thejadefalcon|<sub>''The bird's seeds''</sub>]]</font> 11:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
21286 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21282 +++$+++ 21285 +++$+++ 2009-12-04 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.259986320E09 +++$+++ He was mad that I removed his copy-paste lyrics of the Fresh Prince of Bel Air on [[User talk:15lsoucy|15lsoucy's]] talk page. So, he came on here and (I guess, trying to prove something?) pasted them here. He's blocked now. \u2014 +++$+++ ::::He was mad that I removed his copy-paste lyrics of the Fresh Prince of Bel Air on [[User talk:15lsoucy|15lsoucy's]] talk page. So, he came on here and (I guess, trying to prove something?) pasted them here. He's blocked now. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 20:12, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
21287 +++$+++ Thejadefalcon +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21282 +++$+++ 21286 +++$+++ 2009-12-04 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.259986680E09 +++$+++ IPs... they scare me sometimes... --<font color=\"#009000\"> +++$+++ :::::IPs... they scare me sometimes... --<font color="#009000">[[User:Thejadefalcon|Thejadefalcon]]</font><font color="#03C03C">[[User talk:Thejadefalcon|<sup>''Sing your song''</sup>]]</font><font color="#00A550">[[Special:Contributions/Thejadefalcon|<sub>''The bird's seeds''</sub>]]</font> 20:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
21288 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21282 +++$+++ 21287 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.260005100E09 +++$+++ Indeed. They are [[WP:STALK|stalkers]]. :-P \u2014 +++$+++ ::::::Indeed. They are [[WP:STALK|stalkers]]. :-P —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 01:25, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
21289 +++$+++ Thejadefalcon +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21282 +++$+++ 21288 +++$+++ 2009-12-06 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.260138120E09 +++$+++ I just noticed you need to update your userpage. The infobox down the right still labels you as E. S\xe1nchez. Secondly, is the picture\/text wrong or does my screen need adjusting ''badly''? You say you're white and hispanic but (alters screen setting slightly) the picture looks a lot like an African American. (is very confused) --<font color=\"#009000\"> +++$+++ :::::::I just noticed you need to update your userpage. The infobox down the right still labels you as E. Sánchez. Secondly, is the picture/text wrong or does my screen need adjusting ''badly''? You say you're white and hispanic but (alters screen setting slightly) the picture looks a lot like an African American. (is very confused) --<font color="#009000">[[User:Thejadefalcon|Thejadefalcon]]</font><font color="#03C03C">[[User talk:Thejadefalcon|<sup>''Sing your song''</sup>]]</font><font color="#00A550">[[Special:Contributions/Thejadefalcon|<sub>''The bird's seeds''</sub>]]</font> 14:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

533180 +++$+++ Cradel +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533180 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-30 17:58:00 +++$+++ 1.206925080E09 +++$+++ The reason I reverted [[User:Jovanvb]]'s edits is because this user didn't discuss these changes with other users before editing , he only placed a note saying it was POV so he is removing the flag and coat of Arms for NPOV (as well as the name ) , even if this edit was neutral it should have been discussed first, right ?As for the bilingual names : they were bilingual but [[User:Ev]] removed them ( [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template%3AMunicipalities_of_the_Republic_of_Kosovo&diff=196846172&oldid=196499099 see the diff here] ) ,  cheers -- +++$+++ The reason I reverted [[User:Jovanvb]]'s edits is because this user didn't discuss these changes with other users before editing , he only placed a note saying it was POV so he is removing the flag and coat of Arms for NPOV (as well as the name ) , even if this edit was neutral it should have been discussed first, right ?As for the bilingual names : they were bilingual but [[User:Ev]] removed them ( [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AMunicipalities_of_the_Republic_of_Kosovo&diff=196846172&oldid=196499099 see the diff here] ) ,  cheers --[[User:Cradel|<font family="Times new Roman" color="gray">'''''Cra'''''</font>]][[User Talk:Cradel|<font family="Times new Roman" color="gray">'''''del'''''</font>]] 17:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
533181 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533180 +++$+++ 533180 +++$+++ 2008-03-30 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.206925920E09 +++$+++ This debates get overheated too quickly, I know how hard it is to stay calm. Well, we try our best... Curious about bilingual names, I'll think about it. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ : This debates get overheated too quickly, I know how hard it is to stay calm. Well, we try our best... Curious about bilingual names, I'll think about it. Cheers. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 18:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

283429 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283429 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-06 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.189129500E09 +++$+++ Hey Joe - haven't seen your name on my watchlist in a while!  Good pickup on MJ.  (He's not commonly known as that in the US either, just sometimes.)  <strong> +++$+++ Hey Joe - haven't seen your name on my watchlist in a while!  Good pickup on MJ.  (He's not commonly known as that in the US either, just sometimes.)  <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 18:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
283430 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ 283429 +++$+++ 283429 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 05:19:00 +++$+++ 1.189167540E09 +++$+++ Yeah, it's too quiet around here without Vera and the lunatic.  I've been busy with politics lately - presidential candidates mostly - but then I got caught up in some Lennon-May Pang crossfire and Cat Stevens\/Yusuf hysteria.  Same old same old.  Good to see ya! <strong> +++$+++ :Yeah, it's too quiet around here without Vera and the lunatic.  I've been busy with politics lately - presidential candidates mostly - but then I got caught up in some Lennon-May Pang crossfire and Cat Stevens/Yusuf hysteria.  Same old same old.  Good to see ya! <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 05:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

545576 +++$+++ Shell_Kinney +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-26 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.225023480E09 +++$+++ I have received multiple emails (in confidence) from editors involved in the Chiropractic discussion who are very concerned by QuackGuru but have indicated that they are very uncomfortable saying so on wiki because they will be harassed for those comments.  It is my opinion that his involvement in the dispute at Chiropractic is severely detrimental; editors are having difficulty discussing or resolving issues in part due to his repetitive comments that he puts in multiple threads on the article talk and expands to editor's talk pages as well.  His comments are frequently unhelpful and off topic as well as being very dismissive of other editors opinions or ideas; instead of addressing the issues at hand, he continues to sidetrack discussions by bludgeoning editors with the same comment repeatedly.  I was seriously considering suggesting a topic ban myself before I saw Elonka was trying to gently redirect his efforts.  I could not disagree more strongly with your assessment that there is \"nothing of concern here\" - there are a number of things that are very wrong here. <font face=\"Tempus Sans ITC\"  color=\"#2B0066\"> +++$+++ I have received multiple emails (in confidence) from editors involved in the Chiropractic discussion who are very concerned by QuackGuru but have indicated that they are very uncomfortable saying so on wiki because they will be harassed for those comments.  It is my opinion that his involvement in the dispute at Chiropractic is severely detrimental; editors are having difficulty discussing or resolving issues in part due to his repetitive comments that he puts in multiple threads on the article talk and expands to editor's talk pages as well.  His comments are frequently unhelpful and off topic as well as being very dismissive of other editors opinions or ideas; instead of addressing the issues at hand, he continues to sidetrack discussions by bludgeoning editors with the same comment repeatedly.  I was seriously considering suggesting a topic ban myself before I saw Elonka was trying to gently redirect his efforts.  I could not disagree more strongly with your assessment that there is "nothing of concern here" - there are a number of things that are very wrong here. <font face="Tempus Sans ITC"  color="#2B0066">[[User:Shell_Kinney|Shell]]   <sup>[[User_talk:Shell_Kinney|babelfish]]</sup></font> 05:18, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
545577 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545576 +++$+++ 545576 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.225024140E09 +++$+++ Since I watch Tim's page, I noticed this thread and took the liberty of checking all the diffs.  As an editor who doesn't know the party in question, or you, and is only looking at whether the diffs substantiate your allegations, I have to confess that I'm not seeing it in any case.   +++$+++ : Since I watch Tim's page, I noticed this thread and took the liberty of checking all the diffs.  As an editor who doesn't know the party in question, or you, and is only looking at whether the diffs substantiate your allegations, I have to confess that I'm not seeing it in any case.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 05:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
545578 +++$+++ Shell_Kinney +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545576 +++$+++ 545577 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.225024920E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry Sandy, are you saying you don't believe those diffs show attacks?  Or that he isn't making accusations of bad faith?  Or that he doesn't continue to post to a talk page he's been asked to avoid?  These seem like issues that are rather evident on their own rather than interpretive.  If that's not what you meant, could you clarify here what part you don't think is well substantiated?  Unfortunately, I'm certain further diffs can be provided if there's any question. <font face=\"Tempus Sans ITC\"  color=\"#2B0066\"> +++$+++ ::I'm sorry Sandy, are you saying you don't believe those diffs show attacks?  Or that he isn't making accusations of bad faith?  Or that he doesn't continue to post to a talk page he's been asked to avoid?  These seem like issues that are rather evident on their own rather than interpretive.  If that's not what you meant, could you clarify here what part you don't think is well substantiated?  Unfortunately, I'm certain further diffs can be provided if there's any question. <font face="Tempus Sans ITC"  color="#2B0066">[[User:Shell_Kinney|Shell]]   <sup>[[User_talk:Shell_Kinney|babelfish]]</sup></font> 05:42, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

21290 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21290 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-06 23:40:00 +++$+++ 1.260171600E09 +++$+++ Well, to be fair my real name is E. S\xe1nchez. And I am white race, and of Hispanic ethnicity ([[White Hispanic and Latino Americans]]). I think it's my over-grown hair, but that's me in [[:File:ESanchez013.jpg|the picture]]. :-D \u2014 +++$+++ Well, to be fair my real name is E. Sánchez. And I am white race, and of Hispanic ethnicity ([[White Hispanic and Latino Americans]]). I think it's my over-grown hair, but that's me in [[:File:ESanchez013.jpg|the picture]]. :-D —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 23:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
21291 +++$+++ Thejadefalcon +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21290 +++$+++ 21290 +++$+++ 2009-12-07 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.260255540E09 +++$+++ Hadn't considered it was your actual name. (facepalm) Oh, well, then. Guess I need to alter my screen. O.o --<font color=\"#009000\"> +++$+++ :Hadn't considered it was your actual name. (facepalm) Oh, well, then. Guess I need to alter my screen. O.o --<font color="#009000">[[User:Thejadefalcon|Thejadefalcon]]</font><font color="#03C03C">[[User talk:Thejadefalcon|<sup>''Sing your song''</sup>]]</font><font color="#00A550">[[Special:Contributions/Thejadefalcon|<sub>''The bird's seeds''</sub>]]</font> 22:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
21292 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21290 +++$+++ 21291 +++$+++ 2009-12-08 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.260259320E09 +++$+++ =] Yeah, that's me! lol Yeah, ''Duncan'' is my late teacher's name; he was awesome. \u2014 +++$+++ :: =] Yeah, that's me! lol Yeah, ''Duncan'' is my late teacher's name; he was awesome. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 00:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

545579 +++$+++ Fyslee +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-27 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.225113900E09 +++$+++ FYI: [[User:Fyslee\/Spinal_manipulation_research|Spinal manipulation research]] resources. You are welcome to contribute with comments, suggestions, and additions at the talk page. -- <i><b><font color=\"004000\"> +++$+++ FYI: [[User:Fyslee/Spinal_manipulation_research|Spinal manipulation research]] resources. You are welcome to contribute with comments, suggestions, and additions at the talk page. -- <i><b><font color="004000">[[User:Fyslee|Fyslee]]</font></b></i> / <b><font color="990099" size="1">[[User talk:Fyslee|talk]]</font></b> 06:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
545580 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545579 +++$+++ 545579 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.225156260E09 +++$+++ No thank you, but I'm grateful for the invitation.  +++$+++ :No thank you, but I'm grateful for the invitation. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 18:11, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

21293 +++$+++ cecn +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21293 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-09 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.260418080E09 +++$+++ Hi, I understand that the WP:COI rules would still apply, regardless of username. Could you kindly approve the change in my user name from cecn to funshine?  +++$+++ Hi, I understand that the WP:COI rules would still apply, regardless of username. Could you kindly approve the change in my user name from cecn to funshine? [[User:Cecn|Cecn]] ([[User talk:Cecn|talk]]) 20:08, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
21294 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21293 +++$+++ 21293 +++$+++ 2009-12-09 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.260419880E09 +++$+++ Hello; because I am not a [[WP:BUREAUCRAT|bureaucrat]], I am unable to approve or decline the change or usurpation of a username. Taking a look [[Wikipedia:Changing username\/Usurpations\/Rejected\/9|here]], I notice that the usurpation was declined because you did not reply in time to my question. You must make some type of response within '''seven (7) days''' from the time another bureaucrat or clerk makes a remark or asks for feedback; otherwise, as has happened to you, the request will be denied. Feel free to start [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Changing_username\/Usurpations&action=edit&section=new&preload=Wikipedia%3AChanging+username%2FUsurpations%2Freq another request], but make sure that you constantly visit the requests page. \u2014 +++$+++ :Hello; because I am not a [[WP:BUREAUCRAT|bureaucrat]], I am unable to approve or decline the change or usurpation of a username. Taking a look [[Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations/Rejected/9|here]], I notice that the usurpation was declined because you did not reply in time to my question. You must make some type of response within '''seven (7) days''' from the time another bureaucrat or clerk makes a remark or asks for feedback; otherwise, as has happened to you, the request will be denied. Feel free to start [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Changing_username/Usurpations&action=edit&section=new&preload=Wikipedia%3AChanging+username%2FUsurpations%2Freq another request], but make sure that you constantly visit the requests page. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 20:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

21295 +++$+++ Scarce +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21295 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-11 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.260528300E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:TwilightFan4life97&curid=25078201&diff=331001953&oldid=325800317 This] was quite amusing [[File:Wink.png]] Is it a template? '''~  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TwilightFan4life97&curid=25078201&diff=331001953&oldid=325800317 This] was quite amusing [[File:Wink.png]] Is it a template? '''~ [[User:Scarce|<font color="black">ς ح</font>]] [[User talk:Scarce|<font color="black">д <big>r</big></font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Scarce|<font color="black">خ <big>є</big></font>]] ~''' 02:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
21296 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21295 +++$+++ 21295 +++$+++ 2009-12-11 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.260547140E09 +++$+++ Nah, just a sarcastic way to release my fury :-D. But, if I can find someone around here to help me learn parser functions, I just may make one! Cheers, \u2014 +++$+++ :Nah, just a sarcastic way to release my fury :-D. But, if I can find someone around here to help me learn parser functions, I just may make one! Cheers, —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 07:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

21297 +++$+++ 94.210.222.154 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21297 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-11 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.260549240E09 +++$+++ I'm bringing in back info. Some other contributors erased tons of info. give me 5 minutes, before warning.[[Special:Contributions\/94.210.222.154|94.210.222.154]] ( +++$+++ I'm bringing in back info. Some other contributors erased tons of info. give me 5 minutes, before warning.[[Special:Contributions/94.210.222.154|94.210.222.154]] ([[User talk:94.210.222.154|talk]]) 08:34, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
21298 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21297 +++$+++ 21297 +++$+++ 2009-12-11 08:35:00 +++$+++ 1.260549300E09 +++$+++ Uh-huh. \u2014 +++$+++ :Uh-huh. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 08:35, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
21299 +++$+++ Ridernyc +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21297 +++$+++ 21298 +++$+++ 2009-12-12 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.260676020E09 +++$+++ Was wondering if you come by again and help me, since he is once again slowly re adding everything back to the article even though I have tried explaining to him what is wrong with is sources. I don't mind people trying to improve the article, but I also don't want the article to turn into the massive mess it was before.  +++$+++ ::Was wondering if you come by again and help me, since he is once again slowly re adding everything back to the article even though I have tried explaining to him what is wrong with is sources. I don't mind people trying to improve the article, but I also don't want the article to turn into the massive mess it was before. [[User:Ridernyc|Ridernyc]] ([[User talk:Ridernyc|talk]]) 19:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
21300 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21297 +++$+++ 21299 +++$+++ 2009-12-13 07:49:00 +++$+++ 1.260719340E09 +++$+++ Sure, let me see if I can clear it up a bit for him. \u2014 +++$+++ :::Sure, let me see if I can clear it up a bit for him. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 07:49, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

21301 +++$+++ Dweller +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21301 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-14 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.260826800E09 +++$+++ I do not believe that what you say there is accurate. There is a difference between retiring and vanishing. -- +++$+++ I do not believe that what you say there is accurate. There is a difference between retiring and vanishing. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 13:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
21302 +++$+++ Katerenka +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21301 +++$+++ 21301 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.260852960E09 +++$+++ Yep, Dweller's right. We ''do'' rename accounts that are exercising their right to vanish (see [[WP:RTV]]). Thanks, <small> +++$+++ :Yep, Dweller's right. We ''do'' rename accounts that are exercising their right to vanish (see [[WP:RTV]]). Thanks, <small>[[user:Katerenka|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:deeppink">'''@Kate'''</span>]] [[user talk:Katerenka|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:deeppink">'''(parlez)'''</span>]]</small> 20:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
21303 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21301 +++$+++ 21302 +++$+++ 2009-12-15 05:55:00 +++$+++ 1.260885300E09 +++$+++ Okay, I am sorry about that; I think I did confuse the two. Feel free to remove my note on the request, so as to not create confusion. Thanks.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::Okay, I am sorry about that; I think I did confuse the two. Feel free to remove my note on the request, so as to not create confusion. Thanks.  —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 05:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

21304 +++$+++ 216.153.214.89 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-21 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.261400880E09 +++$+++ Please let me know if I can expect dialog from you on the respective talk pages of the two articles I've mentioned. I'll look for your reply, here, on your talk page. [[Special:Contributions\/216.153.214.89|216.153.214.89]] ( +++$+++ Please let me know if I can expect dialog from you on the respective talk pages of the two articles I've mentioned. I'll look for your reply, here, on your talk page. [[Special:Contributions/216.153.214.89|216.153.214.89]] ([[User talk:216.153.214.89|talk]]) 05:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21305 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21304 +++$+++ 21304 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 05:16:00 +++$+++ 1.261401360E09 +++$+++ I am confused as to why, however, you are feeling [[WP:PDBTN|bitten]], as you seem to have been around at least a year (based on your message on your talk page); nevertheless, we don't want to push you away, and hope you understand what we are doing isn't anything malevolent. \u2014 +++$+++ :I am confused as to why, however, you are feeling [[WP:PDBTN|bitten]], as you seem to have been around at least a year (based on your message on your talk page); nevertheless, we don't want to push you away, and hope you understand what we are doing isn't anything malevolent. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 05:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21306 +++$+++ 216.153.214.89 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21304 +++$+++ 21305 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.261401960E09 +++$+++ I disagree - your speedy revert of my 1st edit to [[Enchanted (film)]] was, as evidenced by the edit summary, groundless. My article edit was NOT \"spam\" and it was flippant and cavalier of you to call it that. Do you disagree? [[Special:Contributions\/216.153.214.89|216.153.214.89]] ( +++$+++ :: I disagree - your speedy revert of my 1st edit to [[Enchanted (film)]] was, as evidenced by the edit summary, groundless. My article edit was NOT "spam" and it was flippant and cavalier of you to call it that. Do you disagree? [[Special:Contributions/216.153.214.89|216.153.214.89]] ([[User talk:216.153.214.89|talk]]) 05:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21307 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21304 +++$+++ 21306 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 05:48:00 +++$+++ 1.261403280E09 +++$+++ I disagree that is was \"groundless.\" The way you introduced the link was not the correct way to do so. \u2014 +++$+++ :::I disagree that is was "groundless." The way you introduced the link was not the correct way to do so. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 05:48, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21308 +++$+++ 216.153.214.89 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21304 +++$+++ 21307 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.261403760E09 +++$+++ Please go back and re-read your edit summary of your 1st revert of my article edit. You called my edit \"spam\". I think that characterization is flat out wrong and if that was your rationale for your 1st revert, then your 1st revert was indeed groundless. As to your 2nd revert, that was needless as you simply could have FIXED the link technique in my edit, rather than reverting the post. If your aim was to eliminate my content addition, you prevailed. But, if your aim is to tell the truth in your edit summary, then in the 1st instance, you did not do so well - at least not if your current rationale about the way I \"introduced the link\" is wrong. That 2nd edit summary makes it sound sounds like coaching could help. I am wondering - is calling my edit \"spam\" your method of coaching? If not, what am I missing here? Where is the \"spam\" in my article edit? And if there is none, why did you call it that in your edit 1st summary? [[Special:Contributions\/216.153.214.89|216.153.214.89]] ( +++$+++ :::: Please go back and re-read your edit summary of your 1st revert of my article edit. You called my edit "spam". I think that characterization is flat out wrong and if that was your rationale for your 1st revert, then your 1st revert was indeed groundless. As to your 2nd revert, that was needless as you simply could have FIXED the link technique in my edit, rather than reverting the post. If your aim was to eliminate my content addition, you prevailed. But, if your aim is to tell the truth in your edit summary, then in the 1st instance, you did not do so well - at least not if your current rationale about the way I "introduced the link" is wrong. That 2nd edit summary makes it sound sounds like coaching could help. I am wondering - is calling my edit "spam" your method of coaching? If not, what am I missing here? Where is the "spam" in my article edit? And if there is none, why did you call it that in your edit 1st summary? [[Special:Contributions/216.153.214.89|216.153.214.89]] ([[User talk:216.153.214.89|talk]]) 05:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21309 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21304 +++$+++ 21308 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.261404420E09 +++$+++ Okay, your point has been made; I screwed up. How would you like me to proceed now? \u2014 +++$+++ :::::Okay, your point has been made; I screwed up. How would you like me to proceed now? —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 06:07, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21310 +++$+++ 216.153.214.89 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21304 +++$+++ 21309 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 06:18:00 +++$+++ 1.261405080E09 +++$+++ Thank you for conceding error. As an act of contrition, you can restore my edit to [[Enchanted (film)]] and correct the techical aspect of my post to your satisfaction. [[Special:Contributions\/216.153.214.89|216.153.214.89]] ( +++$+++ ::::::Thank you for conceding error. As an act of contrition, you can restore my edit to [[Enchanted (film)]] and correct the techical aspect of my post to your satisfaction. [[Special:Contributions/216.153.214.89|216.153.214.89]] ([[User talk:216.153.214.89|talk]]) 06:18, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

576826 +++$+++ Scjessey +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576826 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-26 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.282846740E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Climate_change\/Proposed_decision&diff=prev&oldid=381097219 This] was an ''inspired'' comment. It frames the main issue with the entire climate change topic ''perfectly''. I salute you. --  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate_change/Proposed_decision&diff=prev&oldid=381097219 This] was an ''inspired'' comment. It frames the main issue with the entire climate change topic ''perfectly''. I salute you. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 11:19, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
576827 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576826 +++$+++ 576826 +++$+++ 2010-08-26 11:34:00 +++$+++ 1.282847640E09 +++$+++ I stayed out of this mess...but always intended to chime in at some point...losing Connolley would be a disasterous...his evolution in his main focus parallels mine but the only thing that saved me was I simply had too much work off wiki to stay around long enough to tell the 9\/11 conspiracy theorists to all go to hell. I eventually moved back into land management related topics due to time issues...and I was no expert...Connolley is. Thanks for your comment.-- +++$+++ :I stayed out of this mess...but always intended to chime in at some point...losing Connolley would be a disasterous...his evolution in his main focus parallels mine but the only thing that saved me was I simply had too much work off wiki to stay around long enough to tell the 9/11 conspiracy theorists to all go to hell. I eventually moved back into land management related topics due to time issues...and I was no expert...Connolley is. Thanks for your comment.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 11:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
576828 +++$+++ Heimstern +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576826 +++$+++ 576827 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.282894140E09 +++$+++ By the way, since probably no one ever bothered to thank you, thanks for all that you did in the olden days to keep our articles free of certain people's \"Truth About 9\/11\". An important service that was seriously thankless.  +++$+++ ::By the way, since probably no one ever bothered to thank you, thanks for all that you did in the olden days to keep our articles free of certain people's "Truth About 9/11". An important service that was seriously thankless. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 00:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
576829 +++$+++ Antandrus +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576826 +++$+++ 576828 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.282896720E09 +++$+++ Couple of things:  I noticed your comment too, Mongo, and thank you -- it was an inspired one.  Nail on the proverbial head.  (I can't get involved in that stuff -- I'm not an expert, and I don't have the stomach for all the fighting and stress.)  Also agree with Heimstern about all your struggle on the 9\/11 nonsense a couple years back (just yesterday I heard one of those people interviewed on NPR; I was thinking -- what the hell?  hasn't this person ever heard of Occam's Razor?  and with our government's miserable record at keeping secrets, anyone who thinks something as giant as that would never have had a single Wikileak or whistleblower is smoking something rather potent indeed -- sometimes you just have to laugh).  Thank you for your continued work around this place; there are people who truly appreciate you.  All the best,  +++$+++ :::Couple of things:  I noticed your comment too, Mongo, and thank you -- it was an inspired one.  Nail on the proverbial head.  (I can't get involved in that stuff -- I'm not an expert, and I don't have the stomach for all the fighting and stress.)  Also agree with Heimstern about all your struggle on the 9/11 nonsense a couple years back (just yesterday I heard one of those people interviewed on NPR; I was thinking -- what the hell?  hasn't this person ever heard of Occam's Razor?  and with our government's miserable record at keeping secrets, anyone who thinks something as giant as that would never have had a single Wikileak or whistleblower is smoking something rather potent indeed -- sometimes you just have to laugh).  Thank you for your continued work around this place; there are people who truly appreciate you.  All the best, [[User:Antandrus|Antandrus ]] [[User_talk:Antandrus|(talk)]] 01:12, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
576830 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576826 +++$+++ 576829 +++$+++ 2010-08-27 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.282930320E09 +++$+++ Though I personally believe that Connolley is far from perfect as am I, I see a comparable tale to be told between myself and him...in the case of climate change, I'm deeply concerned that we may have no possible (meaning economically affordable) way to turn the tide...I doubt that major changes are immediately forthcoming climate wise, but the long term (hundreds of years) feedback from doing little or nothing will be looked at by future generations as a serious blunder on our part. Sound, reasonable benchmarks for reduction of greenhouse gas and other pollutions need to be established. I thank all of you for all your contributions as well!-- +++$+++ ::::Though I personally believe that Connolley is far from perfect as am I, I see a comparable tale to be told between myself and him...in the case of climate change, I'm deeply concerned that we may have no possible (meaning economically affordable) way to turn the tide...I doubt that major changes are immediately forthcoming climate wise, but the long term (hundreds of years) feedback from doing little or nothing will be looked at by future generations as a serious blunder on our part. Sound, reasonable benchmarks for reduction of greenhouse gas and other pollutions need to be established. I thank all of you for all your contributions as well!--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 10:32, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
576831 +++$+++ ScottyBerg +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576826 +++$+++ 576830 +++$+++ 2010-08-30 16:56:00 +++$+++ 1.283212560E09 +++$+++ Another kudo for your perceptive statement.  +++$+++ :::::Another kudo for your perceptive statement. [[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 16:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
576832 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576826 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.283338680E09 +++$+++ Scotty and Bishzilla...I appreciate the feedback...well, I surely hate to see so much going on at arbcom regarding these issues over climate change and the editors there...there have been some errors that need to be addressed, but I can't support banning though that decision isn't mine to make...had I been on arbcom for that case, I would have had to recuse myself as I don't think I could have made an objective decision.-- +++$+++ :::::::Scotty and Bishzilla...I appreciate the feedback...well, I surely hate to see so much going on at arbcom regarding these issues over climate change and the editors there...there have been some errors that need to be addressed, but I can't support banning though that decision isn't mine to make...had I been on arbcom for that case, I would have had to recuse myself as I don't think I could have made an objective decision.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 03:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

545596 +++$+++ Gary King +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545596 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-03 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.225768320E09 +++$+++ Hm, well I also [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Amino_acid&diff=next&oldid=247619088 added a review]. The GAN and GAR processes are like this and have been for at least a few months now; perhaps they need a bit of a revamp then. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Hm, well I also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amino_acid&diff=next&oldid=247619088 added a review]. The GAN and GAR processes are like this and have been for at least a few months now; perhaps they need a bit of a revamp then. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02b">Gary&nbsp;<b>King</b></font>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 19:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
545597 +++$+++ Gary King +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545596 +++$+++ 545596 +++$+++ 2008-11-03 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.225768680E09 +++$+++ Okay I will certainly keep that in mind for the future. I've done over 150 GAN and GAR reviews and this is the first time this has been brought up :) <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ : Okay I will certainly keep that in mind for the future. I've done over 150 GAN and GAR reviews and this is the first time this has been brought up :) <font face="Verdana">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02b">Gary&nbsp;<b>King</b></font>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 19:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

545598 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545598 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-29 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.225346940E09 +++$+++ I've activated this feature for you, have fun!  +++$+++ I've activated this feature for you, have fun! [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 23:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
545599 +++$+++ LeilaniLad +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545598 +++$+++ 545598 +++$+++ 2008-11-04 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.225866120E09 +++$+++ When I try to mark a page as patrolled, it says I don't have sufficient rights. Any idea why this would be?  +++$+++ :When I try to mark a page as patrolled, it says I don't have sufficient rights. Any idea why this would be? [[User:LeilaniLad|LeilaniLad]] ([[User talk:LeilaniLad|talk]]) 22:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

484149 +++$+++ Aditya Kabir +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-20 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.200831120E09 +++$+++ I have used the word celt in the article on [[Sitakunda Upazila]], but it is creating some confusion as the word generally means a group of people, not an implement. If you can clear this confusion, please, leave a note on [[Talk:Sitakunda Upazila]]. <font face=\"Kristen ITC\" color=\"deeppink\"> +++$+++ I have used the word celt in the article on [[Sitakunda Upazila]], but it is creating some confusion as the word generally means a group of people, not an implement. If you can clear this confusion, please, leave a note on [[Talk:Sitakunda Upazila]]. <font face="Kristen ITC" color="deeppink">[[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Aditya Kabir|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aditya Kabir|contribs]])</sup> 04:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
484150 +++$+++ Aditya Kabir +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484149 +++$+++ 484149 +++$+++ 2008-01-20 15:00:00 +++$+++ 1.200870000E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot for the help. Kyoko has another question, left on [[Talk:Sitakunda Upazila]]. Can you take a look at it? <font face=\"Kristen ITC\" color=\"deeppink\"> +++$+++ :Thanks a lot for the help. Kyoko has another question, left on [[Talk:Sitakunda Upazila]]. Can you take a look at it? <font face="Kristen ITC" color="deeppink">[[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Aditya Kabir|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aditya Kabir|contribs]])</sup> 15:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

21312 +++$+++ 76.66.201.20 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21312 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-21 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.261431180E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ([[User talk:76.66.201.20|talk]]) 13:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21313 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21312 +++$+++ 21312 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.261431360E09 +++$+++ The WikiProjects have not listed the article for inclusion; if I'm not mistaken, they must \"adopt\" the article first. But, I don't know. My edits have been reverted. I don't feel like asking around right now. \u2014 +++$+++ :The WikiProjects have not listed the article for inclusion; if I'm not mistaken, they must "adopt" the article first. But, I don't know. My edits have been reverted. I don't feel like asking around right now. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 13:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21314 +++$+++ 76.66.201.20 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21312 +++$+++ 21313 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.261431480E09 +++$+++ I have never encountered a Wikiproject that operated that way. And even if it wasn't the case, why did I get an edit warning for it? [[Special:Contributions\/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ( +++$+++ ::I have never encountered a Wikiproject that operated that way. And even if it wasn't the case, why did I get an edit warning for it? [[Special:Contributions/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ([[User talk:76.66.201.20|talk]]) 13:38, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21315 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21312 +++$+++ 21314 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.261431600E09 +++$+++ Well, it's not a \"warning,\" it was a notice. It looked to me like you were testing, so I assumed [[WP:AGF|good faith]] and let you know your test worked, and it had been removed. \u2014 +++$+++ :::Well, it's not a "warning," it was a notice. It looked to me like you were testing, so I assumed [[WP:AGF|good faith]] and let you know your test worked, and it had been removed. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 13:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21316 +++$+++ 76.66.201.20 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21312 +++$+++ 21315 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.261431780E09 +++$+++ Actually, it is a warning, it's the {{tl|uw-test1}} ''user warning'' template. [[Special:Contributions\/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ( +++$+++ ::::Actually, it is a warning, it's the {{tl|uw-test1}} ''user warning'' template. [[Special:Contributions/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ([[User talk:76.66.201.20|talk]]) 13:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21317 +++$+++ 76.66.201.20 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21312 +++$+++ 21315 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.261431960E09 +++$+++ Also note your edit summary ''Reverted 3 edits by 76.66.201.20 identified as vandalism to last revision by Snowbot. using TW'' [[Special:Contributions\/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ( +++$+++ ::::Also note your edit summary ''Reverted 3 edits by 76.66.201.20 identified as vandalism to last revision by Snowbot. using TW'' [[Special:Contributions/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ([[User talk:76.66.201.20|talk]]) 13:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21318 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21312 +++$+++ 21317 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.261432080E09 +++$+++ Okay, fine, it's a warning. But since warnings are all the same to you, I'll just use {{tl|uw-test4}} next time. Forget using the lowest level possible of '''\"warnings\"''', assuming [[WP:AGF|good faith]] and not trying to [[WP:BITE|bite every anonymous IP that shows up here enforcing the \"rules\"]]. <small>[[WP:Edit conflict|edit conflict]]<\/small> Yeah, that <s>message<\/s> edit summary was produced by [[WP:TW|Twinkle]]; I can't help that. \u2014 +++$+++ :::::Okay, fine, it's a warning. But since warnings are all the same to you, I'll just use {{tl|uw-test4}} next time. Forget using the lowest level possible of '''"warnings"''', assuming [[WP:AGF|good faith]] and not trying to [[WP:BITE|bite every anonymous IP that shows up here enforcing the "rules"]]. <small>[[WP:Edit conflict|edit conflict]]</small> Yeah, that <s>message</s> edit summary was produced by [[WP:TW|Twinkle]]; I can't help that. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 13:48, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21319 +++$+++ 76.66.201.20 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21312 +++$+++ 21318 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.261432260E09 +++$+++ No, I don't see why it merits a uw-template in the first place. You could just have reverted my edits without using the uw-template. As the edit summary shows up as a \"vandalism\" message, isn't there some other button on Twinkle to use? [[Special:Contributions\/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ( +++$+++ ::::::No, I don't see why it merits a uw-template in the first place. You could just have reverted my edits without using the uw-template. As the edit summary shows up as a "vandalism" message, isn't there some other button on Twinkle to use? [[Special:Contributions/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ([[User talk:76.66.201.20|talk]]) 13:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21320 +++$+++ 76.66.201.20 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21312 +++$+++ 21318 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.261432440E09 +++$+++ Come to think of it, the TW auto message violates [[WP:AGF]] now that you've mentioned  that... Time to contact the TW developer to add a different message to it, perhaps? [[Special:Contributions\/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ( +++$+++ ::::::Come to think of it, the TW auto message violates [[WP:AGF]] now that you've mentioned  that... Time to contact the TW developer to add a different message to it, perhaps? [[Special:Contributions/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ([[User talk:76.66.201.20|talk]]) 13:54, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

545603 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545603 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-09 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.226275980E09 +++$+++ Hi, Tim, as far as I can see nothing's happened since 6 Nov. Do we have a misunderstanding about whose move it is? -- +++$+++ Hi, Tim, as far as I can see nothing's happened since 6 Nov. Do we have a misunderstanding about whose move it is? --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 16:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
545604 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545603 +++$+++ 545603 +++$+++ 2008-11-10 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.226335980E09 +++$+++ No worries. I quite enjoy a bit of torpor myself.  --- +++$+++ :No worries. I quite enjoy a bit of torpor myself.  ---[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 08:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
545605 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545603 +++$+++ 545603 +++$+++ 2008-11-12 10:27:00 +++$+++ 1.226514420E09 +++$+++ I just checked your latest copy edits. I was a little concerned at the changing of the first instance of one of my favourite phrases, \"family trees\" - until I saw what you 'd done with the rest of the sentence, it was really good and read much more smoothly. The rest of your copyedits are excellent too. Many thanks! -- +++$+++ :I just checked your latest copy edits. I was a little concerned at the changing of the first instance of one of my favourite phrases, "family trees" - until I saw what you 'd done with the rest of the sentence, it was really good and read much more smoothly. The rest of your copyedits are excellent too. Many thanks! --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 10:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

21321 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21321 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-21 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.261432560E09 +++$+++ I don't see the benefit of reverting (what I thought, at the time, were) test edits and not letting the tester know of what happened; that way, they don't show up six days later and are all, like, \"where are my edits?\" On Twinkle, I believe all templates, even your good faith ones, are preceded with \"uw-\". And, yes, there's the \"REVERT (good faith)\" link, which I maybe should've pushed, but somehow, someway, maybe even accidentally, didn't. \u2014 +++$+++ I don't see the benefit of reverting (what I thought, at the time, were) test edits and not letting the tester know of what happened; that way, they don't show up six days later and are all, like, "where are my edits?" On Twinkle, I believe all templates, even your good faith ones, are preceded with "uw-". And, yes, there's the "REVERT (good faith)" link, which I maybe should've pushed, but somehow, someway, maybe even accidentally, didn't. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 13:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21322 +++$+++ 76.66.201.20 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21321 +++$+++ 21321 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 13:58:00 +++$+++ 1.261432680E09 +++$+++ Ah, so perhaps Twinkle needs a \"''revert, good faith'' with message to editor\" button then? [[Special:Contributions\/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ( +++$+++ :Ah, so perhaps Twinkle needs a "''revert, good faith'' with message to editor" button then? [[Special:Contributions/76.66.201.20|76.66.201.20]] ([[User talk:76.66.201.20|talk]]) 13:58, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21323 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21321 +++$+++ 21322 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 14:03:00 +++$+++ 1.261432980E09 +++$+++ No, we have that \"good faith revert\" link already. It is up to the Twinkle end-user what to use, which level, and which template. I stand by my decision to use a level-1 template, as it is the most basic notice still assuming some type of good faith. There's level-2 for non-AGF, level-3 for obvious disruption after level-2, and level-4 and -4im for more-serious vandalism. \u2014 +++$+++ ::No, we have that "good faith revert" link already. It is up to the Twinkle end-user what to use, which level, and which template. I stand by my decision to use a level-1 template, as it is the most basic notice still assuming some type of good faith. There's level-2 for non-AGF, level-3 for obvious disruption after level-2, and level-4 and -4im for more-serious vandalism. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 14:03, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

545610 +++$+++ TomorrowTime +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545610 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-11 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.226467920E09 +++$+++ You're right, I know, that was lousy of me. I am kinda sorry about that, I had a rough day and relentless stupidity like that just gets to me, especially after having had the same debate over and over and over ''and over'' again on other internet forums, only to have new people feeling good about their astounding ignorance popping up every minute and spout the same tired, supposedly pwning talk points. Will do better in the future. Thanks for the warning, good to see people still care about wikipedia, I've almost given up on it by now :\/ (I guess making Japan your main field of interest in wikipedia is a particularly stressful testing of one's wiki-endurance)   +++$+++ You're right, I know, that was lousy of me. I am kinda sorry about that, I had a rough day and relentless stupidity like that just gets to me, especially after having had the same debate over and over and over ''and over'' again on other internet forums, only to have new people feeling good about their astounding ignorance popping up every minute and spout the same tired, supposedly pwning talk points. Will do better in the future. Thanks for the warning, good to see people still care about wikipedia, I've almost given up on it by now :/ (I guess making Japan your main field of interest in wikipedia is a particularly stressful testing of one's wiki-endurance)  [[User:TomorrowTime|TomorrowTime]] ([[User talk:TomorrowTime|talk]]) 21:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
545611 +++$+++ TomorrowTime +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545610 +++$+++ 545610 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.226587380E09 +++$+++ Yeah, but thinking it over, it could not have been a troll or ignoramous, it could have been an honestly meant question by someone who just didn't have access to this stuff, and a polite answer could perhaps have helped somebody see things in a different perspective. That's what gets to me now. Oh well, as I said, will do better in the future. Cheers.  +++$+++ :Yeah, but thinking it over, it could not have been a troll or ignoramous, it could have been an honestly meant question by someone who just didn't have access to this stuff, and a polite answer could perhaps have helped somebody see things in a different perspective. That's what gets to me now. Oh well, as I said, will do better in the future. Cheers. [[User:TomorrowTime|TomorrowTime]] ([[User talk:TomorrowTime|talk]]) 06:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

615223 +++$+++ SQL +++$+++ ABCD +++$+++ 615223 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-27 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.201495740E09 +++$+++ Hey, I noticed that you've [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/block&page=User:72.21.33.202 blocked] [[User_talk:72.21.33.202|72.21.33.202]], as a TOR node, which, [http:\/\/www.as3344.net\/is-tor\/?args=72.21.33.202 it is no longer]. I was wondering, if you'd consider either allowing me to unblock it, or, unblocking it yourself please.  +++$+++ Hey, I noticed that you've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User:72.21.33.202 blocked] [[User_talk:72.21.33.202|72.21.33.202]], as a TOR node, which, [http://www.as3344.net/is-tor/?args=72.21.33.202 it is no longer]. I was wondering, if you'd consider either allowing me to unblock it, or, unblocking it yourself please. [[User:SQL|<span style="color: #fff;background:#900;border:2px solid #999">SQL</span>]][[User talk:SQL|<sup style="color:#999">Query me!</sup>]] 20:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
615224 +++$+++ ABCD +++$+++ ABCD +++$+++ 615223 +++$+++ 615223 +++$+++ 2008-01-28 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.201524780E09 +++$+++ Unblocked. &ndash;  +++$+++ :Unblocked. &ndash; [[User:ABCD|AB]]''[[Special:Contributions/ABCD|C]]'''[[User talk:ABCD|D]]'''''[[Special:Emailuser/ABCD|✉]] 04:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

21324 +++$+++ 92.11.1.73 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21324 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-23 10:25:00 +++$+++ 1.261592700E09 +++$+++ I think you will find it is you adding unsourced information and not addding the sources to back it up. For one your adding a link to \"Acting Head Teacher\" that does not exist. [[Special:Contributions\/92.11.1.73|92.11.1.73]] ( +++$+++ I think you will find it is you adding unsourced information and not addding the sources to back it up. For one your adding a link to "Acting Head Teacher" that does not exist. [[Special:Contributions/92.11.1.73|92.11.1.73]] ([[User talk:92.11.1.73|talk]]) 10:25, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
21325 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21324 +++$+++ 21324 +++$+++ 2009-12-23 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.261613640E09 +++$+++ I don't watch the show, and at this point I think you are unfamiliar with our policies; [[WP:SOURCE]]-check that out. How about [[WP:NOR]]? Oh, and let's not forget [[WP:CITE]], and [[WP:AGF]], oh, and my favorite [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. Anything else you would like me to do? Because, no, I don't really care that you watch the show, as your edit summary states. And, no, you will not be blatantly disrespectful towards me when all I'm doing is trying to get you to find sources to cite what you're changing. We need '''sources''', not someone saying, \"Oh, well I watched it last night and this happened.\" That's called '''[[WP:NOR|original research]]''' and we don't allow that here. \u2014 +++$+++ :I don't watch the show, and at this point I think you are unfamiliar with our policies; [[WP:SOURCE]]-check that out. How about [[WP:NOR]]? Oh, and let's not forget [[WP:CITE]], and [[WP:AGF]], oh, and my favorite [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. Anything else you would like me to do? Because, no, I don't really care that you watch the show, as your edit summary states. And, no, you will not be blatantly disrespectful towards me when all I'm doing is trying to get you to find sources to cite what you're changing. We need '''sources''', not someone saying, "Oh, well I watched it last night and this happened." That's called '''[[WP:NOR|original research]]''' and we don't allow that here. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 16:14, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
21326 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21324 +++$+++ 21325 +++$+++ 2009-12-28 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.261992480E09 +++$+++ Please post all new comments to the '''very bottom''' of my talk page. Your edits were reverted over a month ago. \u2014 +++$+++ ::Please post all new comments to the '''very bottom''' of my talk page. Your edits were reverted over a month ago. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 01:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

21327 +++$+++ 68.192.34.9 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21327 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-28 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.262026380E09 +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions\/68.192.34.9|68.192.34.9]] ( +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions/68.192.34.9|68.192.34.9]] ([[User talk:68.192.34.9|talk]]) 10:53, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
21328 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21327 +++$+++ 21327 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 00:45:00 +++$+++ 1.262076300E09 +++$+++ So, \"you're a smart guy.\" There's a request for you to go and discuss your edits at the article talk page. I suggest hitting \"edit this page\" there first. \u2014 +++$+++ :So, "you're a smart guy." There's a request for you to go and discuss your edits at the article talk page. I suggest hitting "edit this page" there first. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 00:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
21329 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21327 +++$+++ 21328 +++$+++ 2009-12-29 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.262076480E09 +++$+++ Update: look at how nice [[User:TreyGeek]] was! He updated the dead links to good links for us! \"<small> 06:45, 28 December 2009 TreyGeek (talk | contribs) m (24,886 bytes) (updated references. Dead links that were of concern lead to appropriate articles\/pages now.) (undo)<\/small>\" \u2014 +++$+++ ::Update: look at how nice [[User:TreyGeek]] was! He updated the dead links to good links for us! "<small> 06:45, 28 December 2009 TreyGeek (talk | contribs) m (24,886 bytes) (updated references. Dead links that were of concern lead to appropriate articles/pages now.) (undo)</small>" —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 00:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

484152 +++$+++ Yankees10 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484152 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-21 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.200965340E09 +++$+++ Do you know how to make the birthdate in the [[Template:Infobox MLB retired]] no longer be bold, I think the bold makes it stick out to much.-- +++$+++ Do you know how to make the birthdate in the [[Template:Infobox MLB retired]] no longer be bold, I think the bold makes it stick out to much.--[[User:Yankees10|Yankees10]] 17:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
484153 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484152 +++$+++ 484152 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.200971760E09 +++$+++ I made [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_MLB_retired&diff=185931028&oldid=185583194 a change].  Watch out for anyone that complains - at [[WT:MLB]] etc.  \u2014 +++$+++ :I made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_MLB_retired&diff=185931028&oldid=185583194 a change].  Watch out for anyone that complains - at [[WT:MLB]] etc.  —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 19:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
484154 +++$+++ Yankees10 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484152 +++$+++ 484153 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.200973740E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks-- +++$+++ ::Ok, thanks--[[User:Yankees10|Yankees10]] 19:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

21330 +++$+++ Scientizzle +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21330 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-11 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.263273420E09 +++$+++ Please see my [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMaster_S_P&action=historysubmit&diff=337255265&oldid=337244414 comment] over at [[User talk:Master S P]]. Would you mind taking another look at the situation to see if your uw-vandalism4im was actually appropriate? Thanks, &mdash;  +++$+++ Please see my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMaster_S_P&action=historysubmit&diff=337255265&oldid=337244414 comment] over at [[User talk:Master S P]]. Would you mind taking another look at the situation to see if your uw-vandalism4im was actually appropriate? Thanks, &mdash; [[User:Scientizzle|Scien]]''[[User talk:Scientizzle|tizzle]]'' 21:17, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
21331 +++$+++ Scientizzle +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21330 +++$+++ 21330 +++$+++ 2010-01-11 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.263273720E09 +++$+++ Addendum: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=337256269&oldid=337255405 follow-up 1], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Master_S_P&diff=prev&oldid=337256105 follow-up 2]...just FYI. &mdash;  +++$+++ :Addendum: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=337256269&oldid=337255405 follow-up 1], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Master_S_P&diff=prev&oldid=337256105 follow-up 2]...just FYI. &mdash; [[User:Scientizzle|Scien]]''[[User talk:Scientizzle|tizzle]]'' 21:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
21332 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21330 +++$+++ 21331 +++$+++ 2010-01-12 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.263286620E09 +++$+++ Yes, after evaluation, I think I jumped the gun a bit there. Sorry. \u2014 +++$+++ ::Yes, after evaluation, I think I jumped the gun a bit there. Sorry. —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 00:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

283476 +++$+++ Kizor +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283476 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-10-24 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.130217660E09 +++$+++ Hi. Thank you for your recent edit on the [[Majesty (computer game)|Majesty]] article. It's a great improvement over my rudimentary version and looks very professional, better than the rewrite I was working on (which in my case can well mean getting distracted for several weeks, so I don't mind) could've been. --  +++$+++ Hi. Thank you for your recent edit on the [[Majesty (computer game)|Majesty]] article. It's a great improvement over my rudimentary version and looks very professional, better than the rewrite I was working on (which in my case can well mean getting distracted for several weeks, so I don't mind) could've been. -- [[User:Kizor|Kizor]] 22:21, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
283477 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283476 +++$+++ 283476 +++$+++ 2005-10-24 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.130219760E09 +++$+++ Thanks and no problem! --  +++$+++ :Thanks and no problem! -- [[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 22:56, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

21334 +++$+++ Robotics1 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21334 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-13 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.263438960E09 +++$+++ I can't see any explanation of this in the discussion page. Are you sure about this because ABB claim to be first and we should contact KUKA to ask their timeline. Please can you reply on the discussion page. It is so lonely no-one ever posts there......  +++$+++ I can't see any explanation of this in the discussion page. Are you sure about this because ABB claim to be first and we should contact KUKA to ask their timeline. Please can you reply on the discussion page. It is so lonely no-one ever posts there...... [[User:Robotics1|Robotics1]] ([[User talk:Robotics1|talk]]) 19:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
21335 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21334 +++$+++ 21334 +++$+++ 2010-01-15 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.263605160E09 +++$+++ Hey, Robotics1! I am unable to find the article that you requested above. Is there something you need changed? Can you give me a link to the article so that I can see to what you are referring? Thanks! \u2014 +++$+++ :Hey, Robotics1! I am unable to find the article that you requested above. Is there something you need changed? Can you give me a link to the article so that I can see to what you are referring? Thanks! —[[User:Duncan|Duncan (that's me!)]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 17:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

594285 +++$+++ GalaazV +++$+++ Daniel Quinlan +++$+++ 594285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-09-09 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.126259340E09 +++$+++ Dear user Daniel Quinlan, as I have seen an edition of yours at the article '''[[Rosicrucian]]''', I come to request your support to this article that I have just purposed for nomination at [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Rosicrucian]]. May you may give a look into it? And, if you consider it acceptable, then may you support it? Thank you! :) -- +++$+++ Dear user Daniel Quinlan, as I have seen an edition of yours at the article '''[[Rosicrucian]]''', I come to request your support to this article that I have just purposed for nomination at [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Rosicrucian]]. May you may give a look into it? And, if you consider it acceptable, then may you support it? Thank you! :) --[[User:GalaazV|GalaazV]] 02:49, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
594286 +++$+++ Essjay +++$+++ Daniel Quinlan +++$+++ 594285 +++$+++ 594285 +++$+++ 2005-10-06 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.128648000E09 +++$+++ I echo Maltmomma's comments. If there is anything I, or any other Esperanzian can do for you, please let me know. --  +++$+++ :I echo Maltmomma's comments. If there is anything I, or any other Esperanzian can do for you, please let me know. -- [[User:Essjay|Essjay]] ·  [[User_talk:Essjay| Talk]] 18:20, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
594287 +++$+++  +++$+++ Daniel Quinlan +++$+++ 594285 +++$+++ 594285 +++$+++ 2005-10-06 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.128664200E09 +++$+++ Hello Daniel Quinlan, I saw on [[Esperanza]] that you are suffering under high stress. Do you require any assistance, is there anything that can be done to make you feel better?  +++$+++ :Hello Daniel Quinlan, I saw on [[Esperanza]] that you are suffering under high stress. Do you require any assistance, is there anything that can be done to make you feel better? [[User:Gryffindor|<font color="red">Gryffindor</font>]][[Image:Flag of Austria (state).svg|20px]] 22:50, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

21336 +++$+++ 206.45.0.225 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21336 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-15 02:48:00 +++$+++ 1.266230880E09 +++$+++ I thought that Timbaland should have that credit because he DID sing in 4 Minutes. Also, with [[I Get Paper]] no one would go to the talk page, I kept removing that template because I thought that would make you go there. I mean no harm to Wikipedia and you're accusations are very insulting to me. I think you're being a little bit harsh. [[Special:Contributions\/206.45.0.225|206.45.0.225]] ( +++$+++ I thought that Timbaland should have that credit because he DID sing in 4 Minutes. Also, with [[I Get Paper]] no one would go to the talk page, I kept removing that template because I thought that would make you go there. I mean no harm to Wikipedia and you're accusations are very insulting to me. I think you're being a little bit harsh. [[Special:Contributions/206.45.0.225|206.45.0.225]] ([[User talk:206.45.0.225|talk]]) 02:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
21337 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21336 +++$+++ 21336 +++$+++ 2010-02-15 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.266231300E09 +++$+++ As for the Timbaland comment, I understand that the items you are adding mean no harm, and I will [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]], but I must ask that you follow the guidelines. If he did sing it, that's fine, but you need to get [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] before adding it. Do so by posting on the talk page. Please let me know if I can help further. \u2014 +++$+++ :As for the Timbaland comment, I understand that the items you are adding mean no harm, and I will [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]], but I must ask that you follow the guidelines. If he did sing it, that's fine, but you need to get [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] before adding it. Do so by posting on the talk page. Please let me know if I can help further. —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 02:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

21338 +++$+++ LedgendGamer +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21338 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-15 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.266235560E09 +++$+++ By the way, the sig on your editnotice is outdated. '''''&mdash;<font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ By the way, the sig on your editnotice is outdated. '''''&mdash;<font color="black">[[User:LedgendGamer|Ledgend]]</font>'''<font color="blue">[[User talk:LedgendGamer|Gamer]]</font>'' 04:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
21339 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21338 +++$+++ 21338 +++$+++ 2010-02-15 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.266235920E09 +++$+++ Haha! I knew I missed a page somewhere; updating now... thx! \u2014 +++$+++ :Haha! I knew I missed a page somewhere; updating now... thx! —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 04:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

283484 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283484 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-18 00:30:00 +++$+++ 1.134894600E09 +++$+++ Re: your edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Computer_and_video_games&diff=31720851&oldid=31676868 here], the image was blanked on November 1 ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Computer_and_video_games&diff=27080094&oldid=27078900]). According to the editor who blanked the image, \"it is apparently against Wikipedia policy to include fair use images outside of the article namespace.\" Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Fair_use#Policy|fair use guidelines]] appear to back this up: \"[Copyrighted, unlicenced] material should only be used in the article namespace.\"-- +++$+++ Re: your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Computer_and_video_games&diff=31720851&oldid=31676868 here], the image was blanked on November 1 ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Computer_and_video_games&diff=27080094&oldid=27078900]). According to the editor who blanked the image, "it is apparently against Wikipedia policy to include fair use images outside of the article namespace." Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Fair_use#Policy|fair use guidelines]] appear to back this up: "[Copyrighted, unlicenced] material should only be used in the article namespace."--[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 00:30, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
283485 +++$+++ Jacoplane +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283484 +++$+++ 283484 +++$+++ 2005-12-18 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.134894780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the info. That probably makes sense, I'll change it back. Cheers!  +++$+++ :Thanks for the info. That probably makes sense, I'll change it back. Cheers! [[User:Jacoplane|Jacoplane]] 00:33, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

90938 +++$+++ Jarry1250 +++$+++ Eisfbnore +++$+++ 90938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-05 17:05:00 +++$+++ 1.309910700E09 +++$+++ -  +++$+++ - [[User:Jarry1250|Jarry1250]]&nbsp;<sup>[''[[Special:Contributions/Jarry1250|Weasel?]] [[User_talk:Jarry1250|Discuss]].'']</sup> 17:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
90939 +++$+++ Eisfbnore +++$+++ Eisfbnore +++$+++ 90938 +++$+++ 90938 +++$+++ 2011-07-05 17:22:00 +++$+++ 1.309911720E09 +++$+++ Thank ''you'' so much! Funny coincidence that the majority of [[WP:NORWAY]] FA articles are written by Brits! :P -- +++$+++ :Thank ''you'' so much! Funny coincidence that the majority of [[WP:NORWAY]] FA articles are written by Brits! :P --[[User:Eisfbnore|<font color="darkblue">'''''Eisfbnore'''''</font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Eisfbnore|<font color="green">'''''talk'''''</font>]]</sup> 17:22, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

21342 +++$+++ Jhenderson777 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21342 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-01 20:05:00 +++$+++ 1.270177500E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For having a great userpage and for requesting to help other people's userpages. I give you this.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For having a great userpage and for requesting to help other people's userpages. I give you this. [[User:Jhenderson777|Jhenderson777]] ([[User talk:Jhenderson777|talk]]) 20:05, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
21343 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21342 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-04-05 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.270455900E09 +++$+++ Thank you so much!! I'll transport the code right over there now! :D \u2014 +++$+++ ::Thank you so much!! I'll transport the code right over there now! :D —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 01:25, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

527845 +++$+++ Tony1 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-20 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.182370140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for clean-up!  +++$+++ Thanks for clean-up! [[User:Tony1|Tony]] 13:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
527846 +++$+++ Evilclown93 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527845 +++$+++ 527845 +++$+++ 2007-06-20 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.182377820E09 +++$+++ Already {{confirmed}}done. '''<font face=\"Arial\"> +++$+++ :Already {{confirmed}}done. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Evilclown93|<font color="#FF7133">Evilclown93</font>]]<sub><small>[[User talk:Evilclown93|<font color="blue">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 15:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

545632 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-20 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.227252900E09 +++$+++ [[User:QuackGuru]] has been attempting to derail the mediation process as discussed here: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Shell_Kinney#Proposed_text_for_low_back_pain]. If you look at the last few edits on 2008-11-20 by QG and myself, you may get a clearer picture. -- +++$+++ [[User:QuackGuru]] has been attempting to derail the mediation process as discussed here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Shell_Kinney#Proposed_text_for_low_back_pain]. If you look at the last few edits on 2008-11-20 by QG and myself, you may get a clearer picture. --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 23:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
545633 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545632 +++$+++ 545632 +++$+++ 2008-11-20 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.227253320E09 +++$+++ [[User:QuackGuru]] has a long history of sowing discord on the [[Talk:Chiropractic]] page. However, if you think I was in error to call his edits vandalism, I apologise for the mischaracterisation. -- +++$+++ : [[User:QuackGuru]] has a long history of sowing discord on the [[Talk:Chiropractic]] page. However, if you think I was in error to call his edits vandalism, I apologise for the mischaracterisation. --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 23:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

515724 +++$+++ Wildhartlivie +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-09 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.265727480E09 +++$+++ It would have been very helpful for you to have replied to the emails I sent you, or replied to the posts I left here to say you didn't want to be involved anymore. Noting here that you don't expect us to come to you anymore seems to be the goal, why couldn't that just have been said? \"Um, don't bother me, folks. I don't wanna deal with you.\" would have been better stated quite some time ago. As it is, the snarky \"just like your best friend WHL\" was unhelpful and more than a little sarcastic. Thanks so much for your lack of help, which I've come to expect from administrators regarding this situation.  +++$+++ It would have been very helpful for you to have replied to the emails I sent you, or replied to the posts I left here to say you didn't want to be involved anymore. Noting here that you don't expect us to come to you anymore seems to be the goal, why couldn't that just have been said? "Um, don't bother me, folks. I don't wanna deal with you." would have been better stated quite some time ago. As it is, the snarky "just like your best friend WHL" was unhelpful and more than a little sarcastic. Thanks so much for your lack of help, which I've come to expect from administrators regarding this situation. [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 06:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
515725 +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ GTBacchus +++$+++ 515724 +++$+++ 515724 +++$+++ 2010-02-09 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.265780400E09 +++$+++ I wouldn't say that not expecting to hear from you was the \"goal\", no. I was pissed off, and the goal was venting those feelings. It's not a very worthwhile goal, is it? <p> At this point, yeah, I'm done with the situation. You have complete power to cure and fix the situation once and forever, by simply sticking to some basic rules of Wikipedia Chess. You and SRQ have shown yourselves unwilling or unable to do that, and at that point, I '''can't''' help. If I try, I fuck things up instead. Admins are not cops: expecting cop-like behavior is misguided, and when we act cop-like, we suck at everything. <p> If you won't do what it takes to solve your problems, then leave other people out of it. None of us can help you to help yourself. You have to be willing to do it. So far, you haven't been. I threw you a line, and you ignored it, so you're on your own. I don't get paid enough to deal with this bullshit. <p> Expect things from admins; you'll end up sad. Take the solution into your own hands and do what's right; you'll end up happy. I don't care which one you choose. - +++$+++ :I wouldn't say that not expecting to hear from you was the "goal", no. I was pissed off, and the goal was venting those feelings. It's not a very worthwhile goal, is it? <p> At this point, yeah, I'm done with the situation. You have complete power to cure and fix the situation once and forever, by simply sticking to some basic rules of Wikipedia Chess. You and SRQ have shown yourselves unwilling or unable to do that, and at that point, I '''can't''' help. If I try, I fuck things up instead. Admins are not cops: expecting cop-like behavior is misguided, and when we act cop-like, we suck at everything. <p> If you won't do what it takes to solve your problems, then leave other people out of it. None of us can help you to help yourself. You have to be willing to do it. So far, you haven't been. I threw you a line, and you ignored it, so you're on your own. I don't get paid enough to deal with this bullshit. <p> Expect things from admins; you'll end up sad. Take the solution into your own hands and do what's right; you'll end up happy. I don't care which one you choose. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 21:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

21347 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-08 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.276053060E09 +++$+++ Hello, admin(s). I encountered what I thought was spam at the <s>[[Robert M. Shapiro]]<\/s> [[Ronald M. Shapiro]] article a couple of days ago, and reverted the user above. He has edited the article continuously and has expressed both in the edit summaries and above that he has been '''asked''' by the subject of the article to \"update\" it. I know this is a [[WP:COI]], and he seems to have good intentions, and I know we can't '''''prevent''''' him from editing, but would like to know what's a good way to approach him about it. Thank you. \u2014 +++$+++ Hello, admin(s). I encountered what I thought was spam at the <s>[[Robert M. Shapiro]]</s> [[Ronald M. Shapiro]] article a couple of days ago, and reverted the user above. He has edited the article continuously and has expressed both in the edit summaries and above that he has been '''asked''' by the subject of the article to "update" it. I know this is a [[WP:COI]], and he seems to have good intentions, and I know we can't '''''prevent''''' him from editing, but would like to know what's a good way to approach him about it. Thank you. —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 20:11, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
21348 +++$+++ Fetchcomms +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21347 +++$+++ 21347 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.276053540E09 +++$+++ Just ask him if he understands the whole COI deal, and if he's OK with it and agrees to remain neutral, cite reliable sources, etc. no harm done. '''<span style=\"font-family:Georgia;font-size:85%;\">\u2014 +++$+++ :Just ask him if he understands the whole COI deal, and if he's OK with it and agrees to remain neutral, cite reliable sources, etc. no harm done. '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:85%;">—[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black">fetch</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black">·</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black">comms</span>]]</span>''' 20:19, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
21349 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21347 +++$+++ 21348 +++$+++ 2010-06-08 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.276054140E09 +++$+++ Point him to [[WP:BLP\/H]] which will be useful if he thinks there is a serious problem, and [[WP:BESTCOI]] is useful. He's doing the right thing by asking: if his edits are reverted, or if he is in doubt, best thing for him to do is propose them on the talk page and see if he can get a [[WP:Consensus]].  +++$+++ ::Point him to [[WP:BLP/H]] which will be useful if he thinks there is a serious problem, and [[WP:BESTCOI]] is useful. He's doing the right thing by asking: if his edits are reverted, or if he is in doubt, best thing for him to do is propose them on the talk page and see if he can get a [[WP:Consensus]]. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 20:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

283493 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-07 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.136646240E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just wanted to say thanks for the patience and consideration you've shown on 5aret's talk page. I'll try to follow your example if I come into editorial conflict with a newcomer again. Regards,  +++$+++ Hi, I just wanted to say thanks for the patience and consideration you've shown on 5aret's talk page. I'll try to follow your example if I come into editorial conflict with a newcomer again. Regards, [[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 07:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
283494 +++$+++  +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283493 +++$+++ 283493 +++$+++ 2006-01-07 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.136676360E09 +++$+++ Not a problem :-). It's all part of the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee|welcoming committee]], even though I like to take a much more active role than some people.  +++$+++ :Not a problem :-). It's all part of the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee|welcoming committee]], even though I like to take a much more active role than some people. [[User:JHMM13|JHMM13]] ([[User talk:JHMM13|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/JHMM13|C]]) [[Image:Flag of the United States.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] [[Image:Flag of Germany.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] 15:26, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

21350 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-10 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.276154940E09 +++$+++ Hello Duncan, I'm Airplaneman. I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fuck_It_(I_Don't_Want_You_Back)&action=historysubmit&diff=367098181&oldid=367097611 undid] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Fuck_It_(I_Don't_Want_You_Back)&action=historysubmit&diff=367097611&oldid=367097487 your reversion] to [[Fuck It (I Don't Want You Back)]]. Please see the edit summary I left. Cheers!  +++$+++ Hello Duncan, I'm Airplaneman. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fuck_It_(I_Don't_Want_You_Back)&action=historysubmit&diff=367098181&oldid=367097611 undid] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fuck_It_(I_Don't_Want_You_Back)&action=historysubmit&diff=367097611&oldid=367097487 your reversion] to [[Fuck It (I Don't Want You Back)]]. Please see the edit summary I left. Cheers! [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 00:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
21351 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21350 +++$+++ 21350 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.276155060E09 +++$+++ Uh-oh! Oops! I didn't notice that was in there when I did the reversion; sorry about that. :-) \u2014 +++$+++ :Uh-oh! Oops! I didn't notice that was in there when I did the reversion; sorry about that. :-) —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 00:31, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
21352 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21350 +++$+++ 21351 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.276155240E09 +++$+++ That's OK :). Nice to meet you,  +++$+++ ::That's OK :). Nice to meet you, [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 00:34, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

283495 +++$+++ Mailer diablo +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283495 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-10 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.136890380E09 +++$+++ - ''Best regards'',  +++$+++ - ''Best regards'', [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 02:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
283496 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283495 +++$+++ 283495 +++$+++ 2006-01-12 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.137069480E09 +++$+++ I feel Joe's pronunciation of his name should take precedence, even if it's technically incorrect. -- +++$+++ :I feel Joe's pronunciation of his name should take precedence, even if it's technically incorrect. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 04:38, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
283497 +++$+++ Xorkl000 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283495 +++$+++ 283496 +++$+++ 2006-01-12 04:44:00 +++$+++ 1.137069840E09 +++$+++ thanks, but strongly disagree, i've heard him pronounce his name on radio here in fiji, and he pronounces his name correctly, am reverting -- +++$+++ ::thanks, but strongly disagree, i've heard him pronounce his name on radio here in fiji, and he pronounces his name correctly, am reverting --[[User:Xorkl000|Xorkl000]] 04:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
283498 +++$+++  +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283495 +++$+++ 283497 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Not a problem, and thanks for the correction. I may add a footnote to the article to cover the common mispronunciation. Can you add stress marks to indicate correct stress? Thanks and regards. --Muchness 04:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :::Not a problem, and thanks for the correction. I may add a footnote to the article to cover the common mispronunciation. Can you add stress marks to indicate correct stress? Thanks and regards. --Muchness 04:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
283499 +++$+++ Xorkl000 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283495 +++$+++ 283498 +++$+++ 2006-01-12 05:34:00 +++$+++ 1.137072840E09 +++$+++ thats one of the things i wanted you to check, my IPA is not that strong.  Stress is on the second last sil -- +++$+++ ::::thats one of the things i wanted you to check, my IPA is not that strong.  Stress is on the second last sil --[[User:Xorkl000|Xorkl000]] 05:34, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
283500 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283495 +++$+++ 283499 +++$+++ 2006-01-12 05:45:00 +++$+++ 1.137073500E09 +++$+++ No prob, added the stress. And thanks again for the correction. -- +++$+++ :::::No prob, added the stress. And thanks again for the correction. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 05:45, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

21354 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21354 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-17 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.276838760E09 +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> \u2013 +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 22:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
21355 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21354 +++$+++ 21354 +++$+++ 2010-06-24 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.277420880E09 +++$+++ Hello, Dale. I'm glad you enjoyed reading our article on [[Computer User]], but I must say, I can't take [[WP:OWN|all the credit]]. :-) Yes, you are welcome to add as much stuff as you'd like to the article, as long as 1) it's [[WP:VERIFY|verifiable]], [[WP:FRCN|free content]], and 2) it adheres to our [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy. I know, sometimes, being too [[WP:COI|closely-related]] to the article's subject can make it hard to remain neutral, but we must try. Be sure to ask if you need any help. Thanks for your contributions! \u2014 +++$+++ :Hello, Dale. I'm glad you enjoyed reading our article on [[Computer User]], but I must say, I can't take [[WP:OWN|all the credit]]. :-) Yes, you are welcome to add as much stuff as you'd like to the article, as long as 1) it's [[WP:VERIFY|verifiable]], [[WP:FRCN|free content]], and 2) it adheres to our [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy. I know, sometimes, being too [[WP:COI|closely-related]] to the article's subject can make it hard to remain neutral, but we must try. Be sure to ask if you need any help. Thanks for your contributions! —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 16:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

21356 +++$+++ Sellyminime +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21356 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-26 09:59:00 +++$+++ 1.280163540E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Sellyminime|Sellyminime]] ([[User talk:Sellyminime|talk]]) 09:59, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
21357 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21356 +++$+++ 21356 +++$+++ 2010-07-26 10:02:00 +++$+++ 1.280163720E09 +++$+++ Hello. :-) Yes, I think I only reverted due to (not the fact it's 4 AM and I am zombie-editing) the word \"exceptional,\" which is not consistent with our [[WP:NEUTRAL|neutrality]] policy. We cannot say \"exceptional,\" but perhaps, \"one of the lowest in the state,\" etc. Catch my drift? :-D Happy editing! \u2014 +++$+++ :Hello. :-) Yes, I think I only reverted due to (not the fact it's 4 AM and I am zombie-editing) the word "exceptional," which is not consistent with our [[WP:NEUTRAL|neutrality]] policy. We cannot say "exceptional," but perhaps, "one of the lowest in the state," etc. Catch my drift? :-D Happy editing! —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 10:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
21358 +++$+++ Sellyminime +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21356 +++$+++ 21357 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.280230440E09 +++$+++ Oh, okay then. Thanks for telling me! I have spent about 4 years on WIkipedia without editing and only really started yesterday, so I've probably seen a lot of stuff that shouldn't be there, but I didn't know that yet. I'll fix it :)  +++$+++ ::Oh, okay then. Thanks for telling me! I have spent about 4 years on WIkipedia without editing and only really started yesterday, so I've probably seen a lot of stuff that shouldn't be there, but I didn't know that yet. I'll fix it :) [[User:Sellyminime|Sellyminime]] ([[User talk:Sellyminime|talk]]) 04:34, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

283501 +++$+++ Jcuk +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283501 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-18 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.137638460E09 +++$+++ Cheers  +++$+++ Cheers [[User:Jcuk|Jcuk]] 18:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
283502 +++$+++ Jcuk +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283501 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-18 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.137639420E09 +++$+++ ooer, thats odd. I can contribute to other AfDs so I cant be barred....Strange. Oh well, not to worry.  +++$+++ **ooer, thats odd. I can contribute to other AfDs so I cant be barred....Strange. Oh well, not to worry. [[User:Jcuk|Jcuk]] 18:57, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

21359 +++$+++ Charles Matthews +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21359 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-26 10:18:00 +++$+++ 1.280164680E09 +++$+++ Your message on [[User talk:Jcimpric]] was not appropriate. This appears to be an expert on the topic, inexperienced on Wikipedia. A block threat is not a correct way to handle unreferenced additions anyway, and references have been supplied. I'm watcing the page and will deal with it.  +++$+++ Your message on [[User talk:Jcimpric]] was not appropriate. This appears to be an expert on the topic, inexperienced on Wikipedia. A block threat is not a correct way to handle unreferenced additions anyway, and references have been supplied. I'm watcing the page and will deal with it. [[User:Charles Matthews|Charles Matthews]] ([[User talk:Charles Matthews|talk]]) 10:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
21360 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21359 +++$+++ 21359 +++$+++ 2010-07-26 10:20:00 +++$+++ 1.280164800E09 +++$+++ I am somewhat convinced that he is the same as [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/88.200.78.55 this person], and that's how that happened. But, true, you're right about [[WP:BITE]]. I will [[WP:TROUT]] myself. :) \u2014 +++$+++ :I am somewhat convinced that he is the same as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/88.200.78.55 this person], and that's how that happened. But, true, you're right about [[WP:BITE]]. I will [[WP:TROUT]] myself. :) —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 10:20, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
21361 +++$+++ Charles Matthews +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21359 +++$+++ 21360 +++$+++ 2010-07-26 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.280165520E09 +++$+++ Yes, same person I would say. I'll look at [[real algebraic geometry]] later and will try to sort out the content. Probably a rewrite is going on.  +++$+++ ::Yes, same person I would say. I'll look at [[real algebraic geometry]] later and will try to sort out the content. Probably a rewrite is going on. [[User:Charles Matthews|Charles Matthews]] ([[User talk:Charles Matthews|talk]]) 10:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

283505 +++$+++ Adam Carr +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283505 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-08 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.139392440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your attention to these articles.  +++$+++ Thanks for your attention to these articles. [[User:Adam Carr|Adam]] 01:54, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
283506 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283505 +++$+++ 283505 +++$+++ 2006-02-08 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.139393340E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. -- +++$+++ :You're welcome. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 02:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

21362 +++$+++ MZMcBride +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21362 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-27 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.280219580E09 +++$+++ I like it. :-)  -- +++$+++ I like it. :-)  --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride|talk]]) 01:33, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
21363 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21362 +++$+++ 21362 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.280289060E09 +++$+++ Thanks! \u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks! —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 20:51, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

283507 +++$+++ Markspace +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-15 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.139992260E09 +++$+++ Hi, I added an RFC under Media for this, but would you like to look at it also?  At [[Talk:Marvel_Super_Heroes_%28role-playing_game%29]] There is a short discussion about whether to include a price\/product list on the article main page.  This list was deleted once but now it's back.  Should it stay or go?  Oh, and I hope this is the correct way to leave a message for you.  +++$+++ Hi, I added an RFC under Media for this, but would you like to look at it also?  At [[Talk:Marvel_Super_Heroes_%28role-playing_game%29]] There is a short discussion about whether to include a price/product list on the article main page.  This list was deleted once but now it's back.  Should it stay or go?  Oh, and I hope this is the correct way to leave a message for you. [[User:Markspace|Markspace]] 00:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
283508 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283507 +++$+++ 283507 +++$+++ 2006-02-15 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.140001680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up. I'll take a look and offer my 2 cents. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up. I'll take a look and offer my 2 cents. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 03:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

21364 +++$+++ Spitfire +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21364 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-27 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.280295000E09 +++$+++ Sorry, we seem to have conflicted with each other in reviewing this submission. I'm curious as to why you thought it should be declined? It seems to be well referenced and notable under GNG and ANYBIO. Kind regards,  +++$+++ Sorry, we seem to have conflicted with each other in reviewing this submission. I'm curious as to why you thought it should be declined? It seems to be well referenced and notable under GNG and ANYBIO. Kind regards, [[User:Spitfire|Spitfire]]<sup>[[User talk:Spitfire|Tally-ho!]]</sup> 22:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
21365 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21364 +++$+++ 21364 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.280295060E09 +++$+++ I actually thought someone had declined it and a vandal just made the template seem as if it were accepted. My next thought was to move the article, but you came along. :-) \u2014 +++$+++ :I actually thought someone had declined it and a vandal just made the template seem as if it were accepted. My next thought was to move the article, but you came along. :-) —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 22:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
21366 +++$+++ Spitfire +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21364 +++$+++ 21365 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.280295300E09 +++$+++ Ah, alright, no worries. It was declined a while ago, but that was undone and the user who tried to decline it has since been blocked as a [[WP:SOCK|sock]]. Thanks. Kind regards,  +++$+++ ::Ah, alright, no worries. It was declined a while ago, but that was undone and the user who tried to decline it has since been blocked as a [[WP:SOCK|sock]]. Thanks. Kind regards, [[User:Spitfire|Spitfire]]<sup>[[User talk:Spitfire|Tally-ho!]]</sup> 22:35, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

283509 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283509 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-18 08:47:00 +++$+++ 1.140281220E09 +++$+++ Hi, re your edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Computer_and_video_games&diff=40110814&oldid=39976372 here], the image was blanked because it's against Wikipedia policy to include fair use images outside the article namespace. -- +++$+++ Hi, re your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Computer_and_video_games&diff=40110814&oldid=39976372 here], the image was blanked because it's against Wikipedia policy to include fair use images outside the article namespace. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 08:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
283510 +++$+++ Tertiary7 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283509 +++$+++ 283509 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 20:50:00 +++$+++ 1.140324600E09 +++$+++ Oh I see. Thanks for the info.  Perhaps a game cover placeholder, instead. Unless there's already one in use elsewhere, maybe I should look into that.  +++$+++ : Oh I see. Thanks for the info.  Perhaps a game cover placeholder, instead. Unless there's already one in use elsewhere, maybe I should look into that. [[User:Tertiary7|Tertiary7]] 20:50, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
283511 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283509 +++$+++ 283510 +++$+++ 2006-02-18 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.140325560E09 +++$+++ No problem. A placeholder image is a good idea and probably preferable to what's there now. -- +++$+++ ::No problem. A placeholder image is a good idea and probably preferable to what's there now. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 21:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
283512 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283509 +++$+++ 283510 +++$+++ 2006-02-25 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.140938340E09 +++$+++ The policy guidelines are pretty clear about this &ndash; see [[Wikipedia:Fair use#Policy|WP fair use policy]] #9. I've deleted the images on the pages you linked to and left a note raising the issue on the article talk pages. -- +++$+++ ::The policy guidelines are pretty clear about this &ndash; see [[Wikipedia:Fair use#Policy|WP fair use policy]] #9. I've deleted the images on the pages you linked to and left a note raising the issue on the article talk pages. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 23:19, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

21367 +++$+++ Dsexpert +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-28 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.280320980E09 +++$+++ I believe Wikipedia is becoming a very important source of detailed and unbiased source of technology comparison and research information for business people thanks to contributions by expert users. A too restrictive and tight policy that prevents upcoming and notable companies from being represented will be a disservice to Wikipedia users. I would also add that notability is contextual, meaning a technology company being selected by Gartner is EQUALLY NOTABLE as a politician being endorsed by New York Times or a restaurant being mentioned in Time or a researcher being published by IEEE. Since Wikipedia applies to all types of information and not just popular culture, we cannot apply same standard of notability to all articles. Duncan, I hope you will reconsider and approve my article. This is my first article and I am trying to be a good citizen and intend to contribute to enrich Wikipedia further.  +++$+++ I believe Wikipedia is becoming a very important source of detailed and unbiased source of technology comparison and research information for business people thanks to contributions by expert users. A too restrictive and tight policy that prevents upcoming and notable companies from being represented will be a disservice to Wikipedia users. I would also add that notability is contextual, meaning a technology company being selected by Gartner is EQUALLY NOTABLE as a politician being endorsed by New York Times or a restaurant being mentioned in Time or a researcher being published by IEEE. Since Wikipedia applies to all types of information and not just popular culture, we cannot apply same standard of notability to all articles. Duncan, I hope you will reconsider and approve my article. This is my first article and I am trying to be a good citizen and intend to contribute to enrich Wikipedia further. [[User:Dsexpert|Dsexpert]] ([[User talk:Dsexpert|talk]]) 05:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
21368 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21367 +++$+++ 21367 +++$+++ 2010-07-29 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.280405400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your contributions; we really appreciate them. However, please remember we ''do'' have to hold articles to our [[WP:NOTABILITY|notability guidelines]], regardless of subject (we have guidelines for almost everything!) Thank you, also, for understanding that. \u2014 +++$+++ :Thanks for your contributions; we really appreciate them. However, please remember we ''do'' have to hold articles to our [[WP:NOTABILITY|notability guidelines]], regardless of subject (we have guidelines for almost everything!) Thank you, also, for understanding that. —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 05:10, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
21369 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21367 +++$+++ 21367 +++$+++ 2010-07-29 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.280404560E09 +++$+++ I don't have any more power than [[:meta:Wikipedia power structure|you do]]. Feel free to start helping out at the [[WP:AFC|articles for creation]] center. If you didn't agree, you did the right thing by re-nominating it. I'll allow another one of our volunteers to review your submission. Thank you for your understanding. \u2014 +++$+++ :I don't have any more power than [[:meta:Wikipedia power structure|you do]]. Feel free to start helping out at the [[WP:AFC|articles for creation]] center. If you didn't agree, you did the right thing by re-nominating it. I'll allow another one of our volunteers to review your submission. Thank you for your understanding. —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 04:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
21370 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21367 +++$+++ 21369 +++$+++ 2010-07-29 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.280404800E09 +++$+++ '''P.S.''': Since you have an account, it isn't necessary for you to use the AFC system; it's geared towards those without an account. Please draft an article using your own namespace (see [[WP:SUBPAGES]]) and then just move it into the mainspace when it's ready. \u2014 +++$+++ ::'''P.S.''': Since you have an account, it isn't necessary for you to use the AFC system; it's geared towards those without an account. Please draft an article using your own namespace (see [[WP:SUBPAGES]]) and then just move it into the mainspace when it's ready. —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 05:00, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

545656 +++$+++ Mike Christie +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-26 20:28:00 +++$+++ 1.227760080E09 +++$+++ Tim, I don't know if you have the time or inclination, but [[Acid dissociation constant]] is running into some friction at its [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\/Acid dissociation constant|FAC]].  A couple of editors have said it needs a copyedit, but the primary editor is resistant, feeling that the technical language is precise and changing it for readability would not benefit the article.  I think it could do with a copyedit pass from someone who has experience with editing technical articles; I have copyedited it myself but I think I've done all the good I can.  I know you're good with technical articles; if you have time, it would be great if you could take a look.  I know you're busy, though, so no problem if you don't have time.  Thanks --  +++$+++ Tim, I don't know if you have the time or inclination, but [[Acid dissociation constant]] is running into some friction at its [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Acid dissociation constant|FAC]].  A couple of editors have said it needs a copyedit, but the primary editor is resistant, feeling that the technical language is precise and changing it for readability would not benefit the article.  I think it could do with a copyedit pass from someone who has experience with editing technical articles; I have copyedited it myself but I think I've done all the good I can.  I know you're good with technical articles; if you have time, it would be great if you could take a look.  I know you're busy, though, so no problem if you don't have time.  Thanks -- [[User:Mike Christie|Mike Christie]] [[User_talk:Mike Christie|(talk)]] 20:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
545657 +++$+++ Mike Christie +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545656 +++$+++ 545656 +++$+++ 2008-11-26 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.227764880E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ :Thanks! [[User:Mike Christie|Mike Christie]] [[User_talk:Mike Christie|(talk)]] 21:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
545658 +++$+++ Mike Christie +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545656 +++$+++ 545657 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 00:51:00 +++$+++ 1.227775860E09 +++$+++ Ouch.  Sorry about the outcome; and I really appreciate you spending some time on trying to help.  I am genuinely uncertain about the need for the specific language that is in that article; my knowledge of science tells me that sometimes apparently innocuous changes can change the meaning dramatically, but my experience in writing about arcane topics tells me that there are almost always improvements that can be made to clarity.  Thank you again for trying.   +++$+++ ::Ouch.  Sorry about the outcome; and I really appreciate you spending some time on trying to help.  I am genuinely uncertain about the need for the specific language that is in that article; my knowledge of science tells me that sometimes apparently innocuous changes can change the meaning dramatically, but my experience in writing about arcane topics tells me that there are almost always improvements that can be made to clarity.  Thank you again for trying.  [[User:Mike Christie|Mike Christie]] [[User_talk:Mike Christie|(talk)]] 00:51, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

283513 +++$+++ Theshibboleth +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283513 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-25 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.140881040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for moving my comment. I think I must have been really tired...  +++$+++ Thanks for moving my comment. I think I must have been really tired... [[User:Theshibboleth|Theshibboleth]] 07:24, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
283514 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283513 +++$+++ 283513 +++$+++ 2006-02-25 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.140905340E09 +++$+++ No problem :) -- +++$+++ : No problem :) --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 14:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

21371 +++$+++ Armbrust +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21371 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-02 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.280738100E09 +++$+++ |} <font color=\"#082567\"> +++$+++ |} <font color="#082567">[[User:Armbrust|Armbrust]]</font> <sup><font color="#E3A857">[[User talk:Armbrust|Talk]]</font></sup> <sub><font color="#008000">[[Special:Contributions/Armbrust|Contribs]]</font></sub> 01:35, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
21372 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21371 +++$+++ 21371 +++$+++ 2010-08-03 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.280821800E09 +++$+++ '''Thank you,''' Armbrust! <small>...and fellow [[WP:BDAY]] members!<\/small> \u2014 +++$+++ :'''Thank you,''' Armbrust! <small>...and fellow [[WP:BDAY]] members!</small> —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 00:50, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

21373 +++$+++ Fetchcomms +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21373 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-13 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.281763680E09 +++$+++ Just a note; for things like [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?diff=378785375&oldid=378425114 this], please blank the article using {{tl|Afc cleared}} if it's confirmed to be a copyvio. Also, please change the \"cv-bot\" parameter to just \"cv\", as that indicates it has been confirmed as a cv. Thanks! '''<span style=\"font-family:Georgia;font-size:85%;\">\u2014 +++$+++ Just a note; for things like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=378785375&oldid=378425114 this], please blank the article using {{tl|Afc cleared}} if it's confirmed to be a copyvio. Also, please change the "cv-bot" parameter to just "cv", as that indicates it has been confirmed as a cv. Thanks! '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:85%;">—[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black">fetch</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black">·</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black">comms</span>]]</span>''' 22:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
21374 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21373 +++$+++ 21373 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.281763800E09 +++$+++ You got it! :D. Thanks! \u2014 +++$+++ :You got it! :D. Thanks! —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 22:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

545663 +++$+++ NighthawkJ +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545663 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-29 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.227951780E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim.  There is a serious error in the metabolism map that has been inserted at the bottom of the following articles: [[Glycolysis]], [[Citric acid cycle]], [[Pentose phosphate pathway]], [[Gluconeogenesis]].  There may be others articles that I have yet to find with the same map.  The error has to do with the pathway going from pyruvate to lactate and ethanol, which are examples of [[fermentation]].  Instead the pathway is incorrectly labeled [[anaerobic respiration]].  This error may be perpetuating [[Talk:Anaerobic respiration|the belief that fermentation and anaerobic respiration are synonymous]].  I'm turning to you because I have no idea how to fix it.   +++$+++ Hi Tim.  There is a serious error in the metabolism map that has been inserted at the bottom of the following articles: [[Glycolysis]], [[Citric acid cycle]], [[Pentose phosphate pathway]], [[Gluconeogenesis]].  There may be others articles that I have yet to find with the same map.  The error has to do with the pathway going from pyruvate to lactate and ethanol, which are examples of [[fermentation]].  Instead the pathway is incorrectly labeled [[anaerobic respiration]].  This error may be perpetuating [[Talk:Anaerobic respiration|the belief that fermentation and anaerobic respiration are synonymous]].  I'm turning to you because I have no idea how to fix it.  [[User:NighthawkJ|NighthawkJ]] ([[User talk:NighthawkJ|talk]]) 01:43, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
545664 +++$+++ NighthawkJ +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545663 +++$+++ 545663 +++$+++ 2008-12-01 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.228185060E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  I see that you corrected the [[Template:Metabolic pathways|template]].  I'm confused about one thing though.  I thought that any change to the template would automatically appear in the metabolic map in the various articles, but this doesn't appear to be the case.  To make the correct version of map appear, I went into the [[glycolysis]] and [[citric acid cycle]] articles and clicked the last \"edit\" section link.  ''Without changing anything in the article'', I then clicked \"Save page,\" and the correct version of the map appeared!  (Another curiosity is that my action didn't appear in the History of the articles.)  I was wondering if I did the right thing, so I didn't touch the other articles, which still had the incorrect version of the map.  However, I noticed today that the correct version of the map now appears in the [[pentose phosphate pathway]] and [[branched-chain amino acids]] articles, yet the [[gluconeogenesis]] article, along with a few others, still have the incorrect version.  I'm stumped.  Should I make the change to the remaining articles myself, or will the correct version of the map slowly make its way into the various articles?   +++$+++ :Thanks!  I see that you corrected the [[Template:Metabolic pathways|template]].  I'm confused about one thing though.  I thought that any change to the template would automatically appear in the metabolic map in the various articles, but this doesn't appear to be the case.  To make the correct version of map appear, I went into the [[glycolysis]] and [[citric acid cycle]] articles and clicked the last "edit" section link.  ''Without changing anything in the article'', I then clicked "Save page," and the correct version of the map appeared!  (Another curiosity is that my action didn't appear in the History of the articles.)  I was wondering if I did the right thing, so I didn't touch the other articles, which still had the incorrect version of the map.  However, I noticed today that the correct version of the map now appears in the [[pentose phosphate pathway]] and [[branched-chain amino acids]] articles, yet the [[gluconeogenesis]] article, along with a few others, still have the incorrect version.  I'm stumped.  Should I make the change to the remaining articles myself, or will the correct version of the map slowly make its way into the various articles?  [[User:NighthawkJ|NighthawkJ]] ([[User talk:NighthawkJ|talk]]) 18:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
545665 +++$+++ NighthawkJ +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545663 +++$+++ 545664 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.228268280E09 +++$+++ Now I understand!  It's not as mysterious as I thought.  Thanks for directing me to [[Wikipedia:Purge]].   +++$+++ ::Now I understand!  It's not as mysterious as I thought.  Thanks for directing me to [[Wikipedia:Purge]].  [[User:NighthawkJ|NighthawkJ]] ([[User talk:NighthawkJ|talk]]) 17:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

21376 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21376 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-30 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.285831440E09 +++$+++ No biggie. -- +++$+++ No biggie. --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  &#x007C;  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 00:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
21377 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21376 +++$+++ 21376 +++$+++ 2010-09-30 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.285831500E09 +++$+++ Haha, yeah! Thanks, Orangemike! See you around! \u2014 +++$+++ :Haha, yeah! Thanks, Orangemike! See you around! —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 00:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

283521 +++$+++  Deryck Chan +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-11 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.142120160E09 +++$+++ The WikiProject C++ aims to increase the quality of [[C++]]-related articles on Wikipedia, and has discovered that you have participated in the editing of them! So don't hesitate, join us! -- +++$+++ The WikiProject C++ aims to increase the quality of [[C++]]-related articles on Wikipedia, and has discovered that you have participated in the editing of them! So don't hesitate, join us! --[[User: Deryck Chan|<font color="brown">De</font>]][[User talk: Deryck Chan|<font color="green">ryc</font><font color="#007dff">k C.</font>]] 15:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
283522 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283521 +++$+++ 283521 +++$+++ 2006-03-14 08:58:00 +++$+++ 1.142355480E09 +++$+++ ''(moving to [[Talk:Role-playing game#Borderlands]])'' -- +++$+++ :''(moving to [[Talk:Role-playing game#Borderlands]])'' --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 08:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

21378 +++$+++ Elika2010 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21378 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-16 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.289974980E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Elika2010|Elika2010]] ([[User talk:Elika2010|talk]]) 22:23, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
21379 +++$+++ Al-Andalusi +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21378 +++$+++ 21378 +++$+++ 2010-11-18 05:34:00 +++$+++ 1.290087240E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Al-Andalusi|Al-Andalusi]] ([[User talk:Al-Andalusi|talk]]) 05:34, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

283523 +++$+++ 82.46.11.193 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283523 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-14 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.142375640E09 +++$+++ Why the hell did you remove 'chuff guff' as a euphemism from the vaginal flatulence page?? Whats wrong with it, its as valid as vart and pussy fart! You think you're being smart and\/or clever by removing it??  +++$+++ Why the hell did you remove 'chuff guff' as a euphemism from the vaginal flatulence page?? Whats wrong with it, its as valid as vart and pussy fart! You think you're being smart and/or clever by removing it?? [[User:82.46.11.193|82.46.11.193]] 14:34, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
283524 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283523 +++$+++ 283523 +++$+++ 2006-03-14 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.142376360E09 +++$+++ Hi, please see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability guidelines]] and [[WP:NOT|what Wikipedia is not]]. Wikipedia articles should not include slang terms, unless they are in notable usage. The term \"chuff guff\" returns 20 hits on Google, which leads me to believe it is not notable enough to warrant inclusion in the article. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hi, please see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability guidelines]] and [[WP:NOT|what Wikipedia is not]]. Wikipedia articles should not include slang terms, unless they are in notable usage. The term "chuff guff" returns 20 hits on Google, which leads me to believe it is not notable enough to warrant inclusion in the article. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 14:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

21381 +++$+++ Seb_az86556 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21381 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-17 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.292648520E09 +++$+++ I didn't know that link was listed under \"disruptive\". Really.  +++$+++ I didn't know that link was listed under "disruptive". Really. [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] <sup>[[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]]</sup> 21:02, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
21382 +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ Duncan +++$+++ 21381 +++$+++ 21381 +++$+++ 2010-12-17 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.292648640E09 +++$+++ It's okay, no worries here. \u2014 +++$+++ :It's okay, no worries here. —[[User:Duncan|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:black"><i>Duncan</i></font>]]<sup>'''[[Special:Contributions/Duncan|What I Do]]'''</sup> / <sub>'''[[User talk:Duncan|What I Say]]'''</sub> 21:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

21383 +++$+++ OberRanks +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21383 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-23 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.308889740E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Ideology of the SS]] - +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideology of the SS]] -[[User:OberRanks|OberRanks]] ([[User talk:OberRanks|talk]]) 21:29, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
21384 +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21383 +++$+++ 21383 +++$+++ 2011-06-24 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.308913740E09 +++$+++ I commented on it, therein.  +++$+++ :I commented on it, therein. [[User:Kierzek|Kierzek]] ([[User talk:Kierzek#top|talk]]) 04:09, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

545672 +++$+++ Petergans +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-04 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.228411860E09 +++$+++ Some minor disagreements will inevitably remain. These should not be a reason for opposition. Rather, put constructive ideas on the article\u2019s talk page, so that the article can be further improved by the normal editing process.  +++$+++ Some minor disagreements will inevitably remain. These should not be a reason for opposition. Rather, put constructive ideas on the article’s talk page, so that the article can be further improved by the normal editing process. [[User:Petergans|Petergans]] ([[User talk:Petergans#top|talk]]) 09:31, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
545673 +++$+++ Petergans +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545672 +++$+++ 545672 +++$+++ 2008-12-04 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.228416420E09 +++$+++ [[User:Itub|Itub]] ([[User talk:Itub|talk]]) has proposed an alternative, shorter version of the lead at  [[User:Itub\/ADC lead]].  +++$+++ :[[User:Itub|Itub]] ([[User talk:Itub|talk]]) has proposed an alternative, shorter version of the lead at  [[User:Itub/ADC lead]]. [[User:Petergans|Petergans]] ([[User talk:Petergans|talk]]) 10:47, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

21385 +++$+++ OberRanks +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21385 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-28 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.309256280E09 +++$+++ The deletion discussion about the category also recently heated up a bit. - +++$+++ The deletion discussion about the category also recently heated up a bit. -[[User:OberRanks|OberRanks]] ([[User talk:OberRanks|talk]]) 03:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
21386 +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21385 +++$+++ 21385 +++$+++ 2011-06-28 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.309304400E09 +++$+++ Yes, I see; running about 50\/50 at this point.  +++$+++ :Yes, I see; running about 50/50 at this point. [[User:Kierzek|Kierzek]] ([[User talk:Kierzek#top|talk]]) 16:40, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
21387 +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21385 +++$+++ 21386 +++$+++ 2011-07-02 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.309649100E09 +++$+++ Since the consensus was \"to keep\", I made some additions for improvement. It still needs work, so your further article input, OberRanks, would be helpful.  +++$+++ ::Since the consensus was "to keep", I made some additions for improvement. It still needs work, so your further article input, OberRanks, would be helpful. [[User:Kierzek|Kierzek]] ([[User talk:Kierzek#top|talk]]) 16:25, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

21388 +++$+++ Carmarg4 +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-06 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.310010120E09 +++$+++ I am most appreciative of your grant of the barnstar. You will be DELIGHTED to know I have just finished reading FDR. Eisenhower may be next up!  +++$+++ I am most appreciative of your grant of the barnstar. You will be DELIGHTED to know I have just finished reading FDR. Eisenhower may be next up! [[User:Carmarg4|Carmarg4]] ([[User talk:Carmarg4|talk]]) 20:42, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
21389 +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21388 +++$+++ 21388 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.310010720E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. As for Ike, I have done some edits on his article page, but not too much. Where FDR's affairs are pretty well known, I have pondered what to do about the \"reported affair\" between Ike and [[Kay Summersby]]. When you start Ike, give it some thought. Cheers,  +++$+++ :You're welcome. As for Ike, I have done some edits on his article page, but not too much. Where FDR's affairs are pretty well known, I have pondered what to do about the "reported affair" between Ike and [[Kay Summersby]]. When you start Ike, give it some thought. Cheers, [[User:Kierzek|Kierzek]] ([[User talk:Kierzek#top|talk]]) 20:52, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
21390 +++$+++ Carmarg4 +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21388 +++$+++ 21389 +++$+++ 2011-07-06 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.310013480E09 +++$+++ Will do; I'll be reading Ambrose.  +++$+++ ::Will do; I'll be reading Ambrose. [[User:Carmarg4|Carmarg4]] ([[User talk:Carmarg4|talk]]) 21:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

283534 +++$+++ CesarB +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283534 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-12 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.144910760E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:CesarB|cesarb]] 23:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
283535 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283534 +++$+++ 283534 +++$+++ 2006-04-13 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.144932840E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for the explanation and my apologies for the misunderstanding. My objection to using the {{tl|wi}} template was that it invites the user to start an article, when AFD has established that there should be no article in this case. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hi, thanks for the explanation and my apologies for the misunderstanding. My objection to using the {{tl|wi}} template was that it invites the user to start an article, when AFD has established that there should be no article in this case. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 05:54, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

21391 +++$+++ Moonraker +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21391 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-08 06:33:00 +++$+++ 1.310131980E09 +++$+++ Don't know if you're aware that [[User:Orlady|Orlady]] closed the RfC at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Philip Baird Shearer]] a few days after you left me a message about it. In my view, the whole thing was terribly childish. Thanks for your input.  +++$+++ Don't know if you're aware that [[User:Orlady|Orlady]] closed the RfC at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Philip Baird Shearer]] a few days after you left me a message about it. In my view, the whole thing was terribly childish. Thanks for your input. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 06:33, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
21392 +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21391 +++$+++ 21391 +++$+++ 2011-07-08 13:23:00 +++$+++ 1.310156580E09 +++$+++ Yes, I was aware of that. However, thanks for the note and I agree with your evaluation.  +++$+++ :Yes, I was aware of that. However, thanks for the note and I agree with your evaluation. [[User:Kierzek|Kierzek]] ([[User talk:Kierzek#top|talk]]) 13:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

21393 +++$+++ Fat&amp;Happy +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21393 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310518020E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot. Mostly [[WP:wikignome|wikignome]] stuff, but I guess every little bit helps. Unfortunately, no decent research libraries within a convenient distance... (...and laziness)  +++$+++ Thanks a lot. Mostly [[WP:wikignome|wikignome]] stuff, but I guess every little bit helps. Unfortunately, no decent research libraries within a convenient distance... (...and laziness) [[User:Fat&amp;Happy|Fat&amp;Happy]] ([[User talk:Fat&amp;Happy|talk]]) 17:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
21394 +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21393 +++$+++ 21393 +++$+++ 2011-07-12 18:14:00 +++$+++ 1.310519640E09 +++$+++ You're welcome.  +++$+++ :You're welcome. [[User:Kierzek|Kierzek]] ([[User talk:Kierzek#top|talk]]) 18:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

90947 +++$+++ Materialscientist +++$+++ Eisfbnore +++$+++ 90947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-10 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.310281380E09 +++$+++ }}   +++$+++ }}  [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 00:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
90948 +++$+++ Eisfbnore +++$+++ Eisfbnore +++$+++ 90947 +++$+++ 90947 +++$+++ 2011-07-18 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.311032940E09 +++$+++ Far too kind; did I really get that one only for my support in [[Anna of East Anglia]]'s FAC and my unhelpful comment in Quisling's ACR? But thanks anyway. -- +++$+++ :Far too kind; did I really get that one only for my support in [[Anna of East Anglia]]'s FAC and my unhelpful comment in Quisling's ACR? But thanks anyway. --[[User:Eisfbnore|<font color="darkblue">'''''Eisfbnore'''''</font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Eisfbnore|<font color="green">'''''talk'''''</font>]]</sup> 16:49, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

21397 +++$+++ OberRanks +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21397 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-26 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.311736920E09 +++$+++ [[SS personnel assigned to Auschwitz]] is up for deletion.  You may wish to comment since you have worked extensively on SS and camp related articles. - +++$+++ [[SS personnel assigned to Auschwitz]] is up for deletion.  You may wish to comment since you have worked extensively on SS and camp related articles. -[[User:OberRanks|OberRanks]] ([[User talk:OberRanks|talk]]) 20:22, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
21398 +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21397 +++$+++ 21397 +++$+++ 2011-07-27 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.311760380E09 +++$+++ Done. OberRanks, it would be helpful to expand the article with info. as to the roles of the infamous groups listed in each section. Given the fact you have stated an intent to merge it with [[SS command of Auschwitz concentration camp]] is a good idea. It will be informative for general readers. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Done. OberRanks, it would be helpful to expand the article with info. as to the roles of the infamous groups listed in each section. Given the fact you have stated an intent to merge it with [[SS command of Auschwitz concentration camp]] is a good idea. It will be informative for general readers. Cheers, [[User:Kierzek|Kierzek]] ([[User talk:Kierzek#top|talk]]) 02:53, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
21399 +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ Kierzek +++$+++ 21397 +++$+++ 21397 +++$+++ 2011-07-28 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311899400E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  +++$+++ :Thanks. [[User:Kierzek|Kierzek]] ([[User talk:Kierzek#top|talk]]) 17:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

283543 +++$+++ IZAK +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283543 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-22 11:27:00 +++$+++ 1.148322420E09 +++$+++ Hi, because you worked on the article itself, please see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Kiddush Club (2nd nomination)]]. Thank you.  +++$+++ Hi, because you worked on the article itself, please see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiddush Club (2nd nomination)]]. Thank you. [[User:IZAK|IZAK]] 11:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
283544 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283543 +++$+++ 283543 +++$+++ 2006-05-22 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.148328600E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for the notice. My edits to this article were limited to some basic Manual of Style formatting tweaks; I don't have the specialist knowledge required to make an informed vote on this article and the related AFD discussions. I will do some research into the matter and cast a vote if I can reach a decision on the debate. Thanks again for the notice. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hi, thanks for the notice. My edits to this article were limited to some basic Manual of Style formatting tweaks; I don't have the specialist knowledge required to make an informed vote on this article and the related AFD discussions. I will do some research into the matter and cast a vote if I can reach a decision on the debate. Thanks again for the notice. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 13:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

545688 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-17 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.229567640E09 +++$+++ Hey - I saw that the [[WP:MCB|Molecular and Cell Biology WikiProject]] got a shout-out in the pages of ''Nature'': [http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/2008\/081216\/full\/news.2008.1312.html]. Cool stuff. ''' +++$+++ Hey - I saw that the [[WP:MCB|Molecular and Cell Biology WikiProject]] got a shout-out in the pages of ''Nature'': [http://www.nature.com/news/2008/081216/full/news.2008.1312.html]. Cool stuff. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 18:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
545689 +++$+++ Stevenfruitsmaak +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545688 +++$+++ 545688 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.229569620E09 +++$+++ Were you involved? I think both [[WP:MCB]] and [[WP:MED]] could use an explanation of what the plan is, as some concerns have already been voiced. -- +++$+++ :Were you involved? I think both [[WP:MCB]] and [[WP:MED]] could use an explanation of what the plan is, as some concerns have already been voiced. --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 19:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

283545 +++$+++ Smawnmahlau +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283545 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-23 00:22:00 +++$+++ 1.148368920E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the clean-up help!  +++$+++ Thanks for the clean-up help! [[User:Smawnmahlau|Sam]] 00:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
283546 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283545 +++$+++ 283545 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.148369040E09 +++$+++ No problem, and kudos for your excellent work in tidying up the article. -- +++$+++ :No problem, and kudos for your excellent work in tidying up the article. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 00:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

21403 +++$+++ William S. Saturn +++$+++ Adam Krellenstein +++$+++ 21403 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-09 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.284083280E09 +++$+++ Hello. You failed to notify me about your GA review of the article [[Copano Bay]]. You did quite a terrible job on the review, I would ask that you refrain from reviewing articles if you are only willing to give 5 minutes to it. I will now renominate. Thanks for nothing.-- +++$+++ Hello. You failed to notify me about your GA review of the article [[Copano Bay]]. You did quite a terrible job on the review, I would ask that you refrain from reviewing articles if you are only willing to give 5 minutes to it. I will now renominate. Thanks for nothing.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn|talk]]) 18:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
21404 +++$+++ Rmrfstar +++$+++ Adam Krellenstein +++$+++ 21403 +++$+++ 21403 +++$+++ 2010-09-09 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.284087000E09 +++$+++ I certainly spent more than five minutes reading, copyediting and reviewing the article (by my count it was at least 38 minutes: from first to related edit); but more time will not fix the deep problems that exist. [[Copano Bay]] is not even close to GA quality by my estimation. Also, I am not required to notify you of the review personally (as far as I know). Presumably you are watching the article's talk page. that seems to have been good enough.--  +++$+++ :I certainly spent more than five minutes reading, copyediting and reviewing the article (by my count it was at least 38 minutes: from first to related edit); but more time will not fix the deep problems that exist. [[Copano Bay]] is not even close to GA quality by my estimation. Also, I am not required to notify you of the review personally (as far as I know). Presumably you are watching the article's talk page. that seems to have been good enough.-- [[User:Rmrfstar|Rmrfstar]] ([[User talk:Rmrfstar|talk]]) 19:50, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
21405 +++$+++ Rmrfstar +++$+++ Adam Krellenstein +++$+++ 21403 +++$+++ 21403 +++$+++ 2010-09-10 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.284111240E09 +++$+++ Yes, I did miss those inline citations. I was wrong, however, those four are simply not enough. According to the GA criteria, it should provide, \"''...in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons...''\". Thus, I'd estimate that a *lot* more citations will be necessary. Do you disagree? If so, I will certainly look at the article again. --  +++$+++ :Yes, I did miss those inline citations. I was wrong, however, those four are simply not enough. According to the GA criteria, it should provide, "''...in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons...''". Thus, I'd estimate that a *lot* more citations will be necessary. Do you disagree? If so, I will certainly look at the article again. -- [[User:Rmrfstar|Rmrfstar]] ([[User talk:Rmrfstar#top|talk]]) 02:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
21406 +++$+++ Rmrfstar +++$+++ Adam Krellenstein +++$+++ 21403 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-09-11 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.284272940E09 +++$+++ Hi. Sorry. It's a good effort, but it's not what GAN is looking for... Rather, the citations need to be ''in-line''. Almost every statement of the article needs to be tied to an individual reference, preferably with page numbers. Do you see all of the numbers sprinkled throughout [[Peace Candle]]? This is a substantial amount of work, and the problem is not easily fixed. --  +++$+++ :::Hi. Sorry. It's a good effort, but it's not what GAN is looking for... Rather, the citations need to be ''in-line''. Almost every statement of the article needs to be tied to an individual reference, preferably with page numbers. Do you see all of the numbers sprinkled throughout [[Peace Candle]]? This is a substantial amount of work, and the problem is not easily fixed. -- [[User:Rmrfstar|Rmrfstar]] ([[User talk:Rmrfstar#top|talk]]) 23:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

533184 +++$+++ Halfelf2000xp +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-01 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.207066680E09 +++$+++ But this was a new article, not a recreation of the deleted one.  +++$+++ But this was a new article, not a recreation of the deleted one. [[User:Halfelf2000xp|Halfelf2000xp]] ([[User talk:Halfelf2000xp|talk]]) 09:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
533185 +++$+++ tone +++$+++ Tone +++$+++ 533184 +++$+++ 533184 +++$+++ 2008-04-01 10:42:00 +++$+++ 1.207071720E09 +++$+++ Right, but there was not much improvement, was it? You can consider the deletion at deletion review, you'll get some more feedback there. Regards. --''' +++$+++ : Right, but there was not much improvement, was it? You can consider the deletion at deletion review, you'll get some more feedback there. Regards. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

283549 +++$+++ Gretnagod +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-05-23 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.148373600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for sorting that out - with all the edits that were being made, I couldn't see how far to revert back to. Cheers.  +++$+++ Thanks for sorting that out - with all the edits that were being made, I couldn't see how far to revert back to. Cheers. [[User:Gretnagod|Gretnagod]] 01:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
283550 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283549 +++$+++ 283549 +++$+++ 2006-05-23 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.148373720E09 +++$+++ No problem :) -- +++$+++ :No problem :) --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 01:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

21408 +++$+++ Silver seren +++$+++ Adam Krellenstein +++$+++ 21408 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-24 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.287971460E09 +++$+++ Why did you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Iraq_War_documents_leak&action=historysubmit&diff=392639436&oldid=392639312 remove] the information that I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Iraq_War_documents_leak&action=historysubmit&diff=392638896&oldid=392638795 had added] to the article? And why did you make the remark \"rv newb test\"? <font color=\"silver\"> +++$+++ Why did you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iraq_War_documents_leak&action=historysubmit&diff=392639436&oldid=392639312 remove] the information that I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iraq_War_documents_leak&action=historysubmit&diff=392638896&oldid=392638795 had added] to the article? And why did you make the remark "rv newb test"? <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 18:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
21409 +++$+++ Rmrfstar +++$+++ Adam Krellenstein +++$+++ 21408 +++$+++ 21408 +++$+++ 2010-10-31 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.288509000E09 +++$+++ I apologise. I mixed up your edit with the one before yours (which was indeed vandalism). --  +++$+++ :I apologise. I mixed up your edit with the one before yours (which was indeed vandalism). -- [[User:Rmrfstar|Rmrfstar]] ([[User talk:Rmrfstar#top|talk]]) 00:10, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

283555 +++$+++ Cheeseypooofs +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283555 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-16 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.150507320E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Stop hand.svg|left|30px]] Hi.  Please see [[WP:BIAS]].  You have deleted certain content from [[Amber Benson]] for the stated reason that it ''does not meet [[WP:IUP]]'', but additional image(s) in the same article meet no [[WP:IUP]] standards either. Please remain [[Wikipedia:Civility|civil]] and don't resort to removing content simply because you do not like it.  This is considered an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]] and is inappropriate for Wikipedia. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. +++$+++ [[Image:Stop hand.svg|left|30px]] Hi.  Please see [[WP:BIAS]].  You have deleted certain content from [[Amber Benson]] for the stated reason that it ''does not meet [[WP:IUP]]'', but additional image(s) in the same article meet no [[WP:IUP]] standards either. Please remain [[Wikipedia:Civility|civil]] and don't resort to removing content simply because you do not like it.  This is considered an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]] and is inappropriate for Wikipedia. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia.[[User:Cheeseypooofs|Cheeseypooofs]] 18:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
283556 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283555 +++$+++ 283555 +++$+++ 2006-06-24 07:53:00 +++$+++ 1.151160780E09 +++$+++ ''note: {{user|Cheeseypooofs}} is a sockpuppet of {{user|Cuthbert11}} as confirmed by [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser\/Case\/Cuthbert11|RFCU]].'' -- +++$+++ : ''note: {{user|Cheeseypooofs}} is a sockpuppet of {{user|Cuthbert11}} as confirmed by [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Cuthbert11|RFCU]].'' --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 07:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
283557 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283555 +++$+++ 283555 +++$+++ 2006-06-20 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.150815060E09 +++$+++ ''Note: this message was in response to my listing of an orphaned image at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion\/2006 June 9]] - [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AImages_and_media_for_deletion%2F2006_June_9&diff=57746754&oldid=57743174 diff].'' -- +++$+++ :''Note: this message was in response to my listing of an orphaned image at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2006 June 9]] - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AImages_and_media_for_deletion%2F2006_June_9&diff=57746754&oldid=57743174 diff].'' --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 07:51, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

21413 +++$+++ Damiens.rf +++$+++ Adam Krellenstein +++$+++ 21413 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-28 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.296271980E09 +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:JosefLeviBotero.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion\/2011 January 28#File:JosefLeviBotero.jpg|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw -->  +++$+++ A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:JosefLeviBotero.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 January 28#File:JosefLeviBotero.jpg|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw --> [[User:Damiens.rf|Damiens<small>.rf</small>]] 19:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
21414 +++$+++ Rmrfstar +++$+++ Adam Krellenstein +++$+++ 21413 +++$+++ 21413 +++$+++ 2011-01-28 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.296275580E09 +++$+++ Per AnomieBOT, I removed the tag. --  +++$+++ :Per AnomieBOT, I removed the tag. -- [[User:Rmrfstar|Rmrfstar]] ([[User talk:Rmrfstar#top|talk]]) 20:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

283558 +++$+++ Kesh +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283558 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-26 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.151385900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Kesh|Kesh]] 22:25, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
283559 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283558 +++$+++ 283558 +++$+++ 2006-06-27 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.151408820E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. -- +++$+++ :You're welcome. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 04:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

21416 +++$+++ Wareh +++$+++ Adam Krellenstein +++$+++ 21416 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-13 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.305339600E09 +++$+++ Hi! I see that the listing of treatises is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_works_in_the_Hippocratic_Corpus&oldid=76237282 due to your work in 2006]--thanks!  What I'm wondering is if you can remember where you got the ordering you followed in this list.  As far as I know, the treatises have never been numbered in any standard way, but as I contemplate sprucing up the article I'm thinking about what ordering might be best.  +++$+++ Hi! I see that the listing of treatises is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_works_in_the_Hippocratic_Corpus&oldid=76237282 due to your work in 2006]--thanks!  What I'm wondering is if you can remember where you got the ordering you followed in this list.  As far as I know, the treatises have never been numbered in any standard way, but as I contemplate sprucing up the article I'm thinking about what ordering might be best. [[User:Wareh|Wareh]] ([[User talk:Wareh|talk]]) 19:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
21417 +++$+++ Rmrfstar +++$+++ Adam Krellenstein +++$+++ 21416 +++$+++ 21416 +++$+++ 2011-05-13 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.305349860E09 +++$+++ Hi. I just had to fix some archaic template use in the article's bibliography: the sources for the page are now visible, and the work whence I (presumably) derived that list is cited.--  +++$+++ :Hi. I just had to fix some archaic template use in the article's bibliography: the sources for the page are now visible, and the work whence I (presumably) derived that list is cited.-- [[User:Rmrfstar|Rmrfstar]] ([[User talk:Rmrfstar#top|talk]]) 22:11, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
21418 +++$+++ Wareh +++$+++ Adam Krellenstein +++$+++ 21416 +++$+++ 21417 +++$+++ 2011-05-14 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.305362040E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I was curious, and now I can check Adams against other listings.  +++$+++ ::Thanks, I was curious, and now I can check Adams against other listings. [[User:Wareh|Wareh]] ([[User talk:Wareh|talk]]) 01:34, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

459287 +++$+++ Rayray +++$+++ Karada +++$+++ 459287 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-03-10 09:47:00 +++$+++ 1.110476820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding my [[British Union of Fascists]] [[NPOV]] changes to the [[Wikipedia:Great editing in progress]] page. Nice to know I did something useful...  +++$+++ Thanks for adding my [[British Union of Fascists]] [[NPOV]] changes to the [[Wikipedia:Great editing in progress]] page. Nice to know I did something useful... [[User:Rayray|Rayray]] 09:47, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
459288 +++$+++ Karada +++$+++ Karada +++$+++ 459287 +++$+++ 459287 +++$+++ 2005-03-13 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.110749760E09 +++$+++ Well, you just did reply to me. You can converse with me on this page. I don't think anyone threatened to \"rip off\" your site, I think they just offered you the chance to donate content from your site to Wikipedia licenced under the [[GNU Free Documentation Licence]]. I think one of the things most objected to is that you are adding a link to your own site. This is generally frowned on, in much the same way as adding an autobiographical article to Wikipedia. When the site is an advertising-driven site, the disapproval is even stronger. I'm well aware of the high Google page-rank of Wikipedia pages (the Wikipedia [[Bukkake]] article is currently #6 on a Google search for \"bukkake\"), and hence their potential for driving traffic to linked sites. Since we currently get over 80 million hits\/day, the temptation to monetize Wikipedia links is high. We tend to resist this by being rather critical about link submission criteria, and in particular, linking your own site. Why not work on making your site more encyclopedia-like and less porno-site like? If you do that, it is more likely that sooner or later, someone will notice your site's quality and link to it. --  +++$+++ :Well, you just did reply to me. You can converse with me on this page. I don't think anyone threatened to "rip off" your site, I think they just offered you the chance to donate content from your site to Wikipedia licenced under the [[GNU Free Documentation Licence]]. I think one of the things most objected to is that you are adding a link to your own site. This is generally frowned on, in much the same way as adding an autobiographical article to Wikipedia. When the site is an advertising-driven site, the disapproval is even stronger. I'm well aware of the high Google page-rank of Wikipedia pages (the Wikipedia [[Bukkake]] article is currently #6 on a Google search for "bukkake"), and hence their potential for driving traffic to linked sites. Since we currently get over 80 million hits/day, the temptation to monetize Wikipedia links is high. We tend to resist this by being rather critical about link submission criteria, and in particular, linking your own site. Why not work on making your site more encyclopedia-like and less porno-site like? If you do that, it is more likely that sooner or later, someone will notice your site's quality and link to it. -- [[User:Karada|Karada]] 13:36, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
459289 +++$+++  +++$+++ Karada +++$+++ 459287 +++$+++ 459287 +++$+++ 2005-03-13 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.110753300E09 +++$+++ Not by me. \/A check of the history shows that, even though I created the first version of the article, those links were added by  +++$+++ :Not by me. /A check of the history shows that, even though I created the first version of the article, those links were added by [[User:FT2]]. If you are referring to my edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Erotic_sexual_denial&diff=4817896&oldid=4811811], you'll notice that I merely reformatted that subsection into standard format, sight unseen. I do not endorse any of those links. -- 14:35, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

283563 +++$+++ Cobaltbluetony +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283563 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-06 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.152226200E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I don't read Norwegian.  But thanks for the info about the AdWords and the fact that the video is not real. -  +++$+++ Sorry, I don't read Norwegian.  But thanks for the info about the AdWords and the fact that the video is not real. - [[User:Cobaltbluetony|CobaltBlueTony]] 15:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
283564 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283563 +++$+++ 283563 +++$+++ 2006-07-06 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.152227760E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 16:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
283565 +++$+++ Videoawards +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283563 +++$+++ 283563 +++$+++ 2006-07-06 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.152236400E09 +++$+++ I also didn't know that this video was fake, looks too real.  But not sure why you consider this site a link farm?  What is your definition of a link farm?  +++$+++ :I also didn't know that this video was fake, looks too real.  But not sure why you consider this site a link farm?  What is your definition of a link farm? [[User:Videoawards|Videoawards]] 18:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
283566 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283563 +++$+++ 283565 +++$+++ 2006-07-06 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.152237360E09 +++$+++ The site has a lot of Google [[AdWord]] advertisements; this makes it borderline per [[WP:EL]] guidelines that recommend against sites with objectionable amounts of advertising. The site was also removed because it contains a CGI-enhanced Nike ad (i.e., no valuable encyclopedic content). -- +++$+++ ::The site has a lot of Google [[AdWord]] advertisements; this makes it borderline per [[WP:EL]] guidelines that recommend against sites with objectionable amounts of advertising. The site was also removed because it contains a CGI-enhanced Nike ad (i.e., no valuable encyclopedic content). --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 18:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
283567 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283563 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.152256260E09 +++$+++ When I load the page it displays a large bar with 5 ads, which I consider excessive. The site has no valuable encyclopedic content, and the only other content on the page is a list of advertisements. -- +++$+++ ::::When I load the page it displays a large bar with 5 ads, which I consider excessive. The site has no valuable encyclopedic content, and the only other content on the page is a list of advertisements. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 00:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
283568 +++$+++ Videoawards +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283563 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.152520620E09 +++$+++ The \"encyclopedic content\" you were in search of was not textual, it was in the video.  And to say that 5 ads on a website constitutes an ad farm is just silly.  I have seen plenty of sites which constitute as spam and I believe you need to recalibrate your expectations of the internet.   +++$+++ :::::The "encyclopedic content" you were in search of was not textual, it was in the video.  And to say that 5 ads on a website constitutes an ad farm is just silly.  I have seen plenty of sites which constitute as spam and I believe you need to recalibrate your expectations of the internet.  [[User:Videoawards|Videoawards]] 01:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
283569 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283563 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.152521820E09 +++$+++ The video was the content to which I was referring; it is not encyclopedic because it is a cgi-enhanced advertisement. My expectations of the internet are not the issue here; what's at issue is Wikipedia's external links guideline. And I stand by my opinion that the link in question is inappropriate per the guideline's wording: it contains 5 advertisements and a video of another advertisement, none of which provide valuable supplementary encyclopedic content. -- +++$+++ ::::::The video was the content to which I was referring; it is not encyclopedic because it is a cgi-enhanced advertisement. My expectations of the internet are not the issue here; what's at issue is Wikipedia's external links guideline. And I stand by my opinion that the link in question is inappropriate per the guideline's wording: it contains 5 advertisements and a video of another advertisement, none of which provide valuable supplementary encyclopedic content. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 01:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

545709 +++$+++ Newone +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545709 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-06 01:01:00 +++$+++ 1.231232460E09 +++$+++ Please add more copyright tag to this image?  +++$+++ Please add more copyright tag to this image? [[User:Newone|Newone]] ([[User talk:Newone|talk]]) 01:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
545710 +++$+++ Kasper90 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545709 +++$+++ 545709 +++$+++ 2009-01-05 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.231153800E09 +++$+++ I've changed the structure of photosynthesis a little bit. I moved a lot of thext from overview to molecular process. I think this is much better, but it's just a begin..<\/br>I don't think that we can use the same structure of Oxidative phofsphorylation for Photosynthesis, because photosynthesis is a much complexer subject. It's not only in the Molecular Biology sector, but also in the plant sector. It might be better to put most of the molecular part of photosynthesis in the light reaction and calvin cycles articles. <\/br>At this moment there isn't much about the plant part of photosynthesis, but I dont think I'm the guy who can fixes this. I think there should be more information about chloroplasts and thylakoids... and how CO2 is moved to the reaction place, things like that <\/br> +++$+++ : I've changed the structure of photosynthesis a little bit. I moved a lot of thext from overview to molecular process. I think this is much better, but it's just a begin..</br>I don't think that we can use the same structure of Oxidative phofsphorylation for Photosynthesis, because photosynthesis is a much complexer subject. It's not only in the Molecular Biology sector, but also in the plant sector. It might be better to put most of the molecular part of photosynthesis in the light reaction and calvin cycles articles. </br>At this moment there isn't much about the plant part of photosynthesis, but I dont think I'm the guy who can fixes this. I think there should be more information about chloroplasts and thylakoids... and how CO2 is moved to the reaction place, things like that </br>[[User:Kasper90|Kasper90]] ([[User talk:Kasper90|talk]]) 03:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
545711 +++$+++ Kasper90 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545709 +++$+++ 545710 +++$+++ 2009-01-07 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.231363860E09 +++$+++ Hey tim, I added a new section, but could you please check my english on the sentences I wrote by myself. I think the overview is still not what it should be, but It's really late here (I'm in New Zealand at the moment)...  +++$+++ :: Hey tim, I added a new section, but could you please check my english on the sentences I wrote by myself. I think the overview is still not what it should be, but It's really late here (I'm in New Zealand at the moment)... [[User:Kasper90|Kasper90]] ([[User talk:Kasper90|talk]]) 13:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

21422 +++$+++  +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21422 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ March 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ March 2008 (UTC)
21423 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21422 +++$+++ 21422 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 18:43:00 +++$+++ 1.206495780E09 +++$+++ Thanks, I just happened to stumble upon this page. There is a more generic \"multi column\" template, but I couldn't find it now. I also just changed the surname firstname linking, because it is not correct to have \"surprise links\" (where a link says one thing, i.e. \"surname\", but the link unexpectedly goes to that specific person's page) \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ :Thanks, I just happened to stumble upon this page. There is a more generic "multi column" template, but I couldn't find it now. I also just changed the surname firstname linking, because it is not correct to have "surprise links" (where a link says one thing, i.e. "surname", but the link unexpectedly goes to that specific person's page) —&nbsp;[[User:Deon Steyn|Deon Steyn]] ([[User talk:Deon Steyn#top|talk]]) 18:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
21424 +++$+++ Tenmei +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21422 +++$+++ 21423 +++$+++ 2008-03-25 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.206501840E09 +++$+++ Questions do tend to accumulate, but I don't need answers -- not really.  If these seem at all onerous, please give it no further thought.  -- +++$+++ ::Questions do tend to accumulate, but I don't need answers -- not really.  If these seem at all onerous, please give it no further thought.  --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 20:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
21425 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21422 +++$+++ 21424 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.206557460E09 +++$+++ \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ :::—&nbsp;[[User:Deon Steyn|Deon Steyn]] ([[User talk:Deon Steyn#top|talk]]) 11:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
21426 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21422 +++$+++ 21424 +++$+++ 2008-03-26 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.206559080E09 +++$+++ I created a new template ([[:Template:Honors and decorations of Japan]]) and put it in the \"See also\" sections of all the orders. See the templates talk page [[Template talk:Japanese Honors and Decorations]] for more suggestions and ideas to expand it. \u2014&nbsp +++$+++ :::I created a new template ([[:Template:Honors and decorations of Japan]]) and put it in the "See also" sections of all the orders. See the templates talk page [[Template talk:Japanese Honors and Decorations]] for more suggestions and ideas to expand it. —&nbsp[[User:Deon Steyn|Deon Steyn]] ([[User talk:Deon Steyn#top|talk]]) 12:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

283570 +++$+++ Michael Bauser +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283570 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-07 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.152256500E09 +++$+++ <div style=\"padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE;\"> An image that you uploaded, [[:Image:Gond symbol.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]] because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its [[:Image:Gond symbol.jpg|page]], if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Idw-cp --> <\/div>  +++$+++ <div style="padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE;"> An image that you uploaded, [[:Image:Gond symbol.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]] because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its [[:Image:Gond symbol.jpg|page]], if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Idw-cp --> </div> [[User:Michael Bauser|Michael Bauser]] 00:15, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
283571 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283570 +++$+++ 283570 +++$+++ 2006-07-07 00:57:00 +++$+++ 1.152259020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the notification; I support deleting this image as a violation of the wizards.com TOS. -- +++$+++ : Thanks for the notification; I support deleting this image as a violation of the wizards.com TOS. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 00:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
283572 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283570 +++$+++ 283570 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.152547680E09 +++$+++ Hi Enigmatical. I feel the entire article needs citations, which is why I added the {{tl|unreferenced}} tag. I tagged two specific phrases for additional attention because they used vague attribution\/weasel words: one sentence used \"arguably\" in lieu of citing a reference; the other sentence began with \"Some people believe...\", assigning an opinion to an anonymous source, and providing no reference to establish the validity of the statement. -- +++$+++ :Hi Enigmatical. I feel the entire article needs citations, which is why I added the {{tl|unreferenced}} tag. I tagged two specific phrases for additional attention because they used vague attribution/weasel words: one sentence used "arguably" in lieu of citing a reference; the other sentence began with "Some people believe...", assigning an opinion to an anonymous source, and providing no reference to establish the validity of the statement. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 09:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

21428 +++$+++ Teratornis +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-27 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.206674400E09 +++$+++ I fixed what seemed to be a broken named reference in [[Oil price increases since 2003]] (the invalid reference had \"Kramer\" instead of \"Krane\"). I also moved the references about Iraq in 2006 from the 2004 section to the 2006 section. It seems you originally added that content to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Oil_price_increases_since_2003&oldid=199580042#cite_note-Krane-21 this revision]. You may want to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Oil_price_increases_since_2003&diff=201402420&oldid=201389636 check my diff] to make sure I properly interpreted the article's history and I understood your intent. If you were not the original editor then never mind. -- +++$+++ I fixed what seemed to be a broken named reference in [[Oil price increases since 2003]] (the invalid reference had "Kramer" instead of "Krane"). I also moved the references about Iraq in 2006 from the 2004 section to the 2006 section. It seems you originally added that content to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oil_price_increases_since_2003&oldid=199580042#cite_note-Krane-21 this revision]. You may want to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oil_price_increases_since_2003&diff=201402420&oldid=201389636 check my diff] to make sure I properly interpreted the article's history and I understood your intent. If you were not the original editor then never mind. --[[User:Teratornis|Teratornis]] ([[User talk:Teratornis|talk]]) 20:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
21429 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21428 +++$+++ 21428 +++$+++ 2008-03-27 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.206675240E09 +++$+++ No, your corrections are correct ;-) Thanks for cleaning up after me! \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ :No, your corrections are correct ;-) Thanks for cleaning up after me! —&nbsp;[[User:Deon Steyn|Deon Steyn]] ([[User talk:Deon Steyn#top|talk]]) 20:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

283573 +++$+++ Enigmatical +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-10 06:12:00 +++$+++ 1.152537120E09 +++$+++ What I found incorrect with the hypocricy page was that it alluded to the fact criticism of bad behaviour even though \"most people do bad things\" were somehow connected. It failed to actually state that hypocricy only comes about when the behaviour being critisized is something the person who '''is''' critisizing has done. Most people do bad things, that is true, but most people don't critisize others for the same bad things that they themselves do unless they are hypocrits. Can you see my point? The previous wording was misleading, I believe the new wording is more accurate and althought I know wikipedia often requires citations I don't think you will ever find a sitation of the previous text because it is simply incorrect.  +++$+++ What I found incorrect with the hypocricy page was that it alluded to the fact criticism of bad behaviour even though "most people do bad things" were somehow connected. It failed to actually state that hypocricy only comes about when the behaviour being critisized is something the person who '''is''' critisizing has done. Most people do bad things, that is true, but most people don't critisize others for the same bad things that they themselves do unless they are hypocrits. Can you see my point? The previous wording was misleading, I believe the new wording is more accurate and althought I know wikipedia often requires citations I don't think you will ever find a sitation of the previous text because it is simply incorrect. [[User:Enigmatical|Enigmatical]] 06:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
283574 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283573 +++$+++ 283573 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 09:08:00 +++$+++ 1.152547680E09 +++$+++ My {{tl|fact}} tags were only aimed at the vague attribution issues, which predate your edit; they were not aimed specifically at your reword. Your wording was a definite improvement in my opinion, but it shares the previous wording's problem of vague attribution\/lack of references. The aim of my edit was solely to encourage interested editors to provide reliable, verifiable sources for the article's content. Regards. -- +++$+++ : My {{tl|fact}} tags were only aimed at the vague attribution issues, which predate your edit; they were not aimed specifically at your reword. Your wording was a definite improvement in my opinion, but it shares the previous wording's problem of vague attribution/lack of references. The aim of my edit was solely to encourage interested editors to provide reliable, verifiable sources for the article's content. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 09:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
283575 +++$+++ Enigmatical +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283573 +++$+++ 283574 +++$+++ 2006-07-10 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.152595620E09 +++$+++ I guess that is where my confusion comes in as I dont see how anyone could find any verifiable sources on this other than just a dictionary definition. At what point does such a source become valid? If the local uni lecturer says something about the topic is it good enough? If it comes from someone who has a degree in psychology is it good enough? This kind of thing is usually very subjective being non-quantifiable and it isn't like there is any one true source that is beyond doubt. I think many people will see hypocricy as many different things for this reason and citations will be difficult to come by.  +++$+++ :: I guess that is where my confusion comes in as I dont see how anyone could find any verifiable sources on this other than just a dictionary definition. At what point does such a source become valid? If the local uni lecturer says something about the topic is it good enough? If it comes from someone who has a degree in psychology is it good enough? This kind of thing is usually very subjective being non-quantifiable and it isn't like there is any one true source that is beyond doubt. I think many people will see hypocricy as many different things for this reason and citations will be difficult to come by. [[User:Enigmatical|Enigmatical]] 22:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

21431 +++$+++ Albatross2147 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-07 13:06:00 +++$+++ 1.207598760E09 +++$+++ You seem to know a lot about firearms. About 10 years ago here in NSW a man was sent to prison for life without parole for having organised the murder of a politician. Part of the evidence was that the firearm used was an unusual one. In a TV program today ( http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/4corners\/content\/2008\/s2210163.htm ) it was described by the prosecutor as \"...a very, very rare .35 calibre 1935 Beretta...\". The list of Beretta firearms here in Wp lists two pre-WW2 Beretta pistols neither of which are .35s. My question is: did Beretta ever make such a weapon even as a prototype prior to WW2? Thanks for your time  +++$+++ You seem to know a lot about firearms. About 10 years ago here in NSW a man was sent to prison for life without parole for having organised the murder of a politician. Part of the evidence was that the firearm used was an unusual one. In a TV program today ( http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2008/s2210163.htm ) it was described by the prosecutor as "...a very, very rare .35 calibre 1935 Beretta...". The list of Beretta firearms here in Wp lists two pre-WW2 Beretta pistols neither of which are .35s. My question is: did Beretta ever make such a weapon even as a prototype prior to WW2? Thanks for your time [[User:Albatross2147|Albatross2147]] ([[User talk:Albatross2147|talk]]) 13:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
21432 +++$+++ Albatross2147 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21431 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-04-09 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.207742640E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help  +++$+++ :: Thanks for your help [[User:Albatross2147|Albatross2147]] ([[User talk:Albatross2147|talk]]) 05:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

283576 +++$+++ Robbstrd +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-18 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.153212840E09 +++$+++ Hi. I removed the dablinks from the 9 hells articles because they really don't seem to be needed. The guide states that \"when a user searches for a particular term, she might expect a different article than what appears.\" Someone searching for \"Dispater (Dungeons & Dragons)\" is certainly not looking for a different result. Putting dablinks on every disambiguated article seems superflous, IMO.-- +++$+++ Hi. I removed the dablinks from the 9 hells articles because they really don't seem to be needed. The guide states that "when a user searches for a particular term, she might expect a different article than what appears." Someone searching for "Dispater (Dungeons & Dragons)" is certainly not looking for a different result. Putting dablinks on every disambiguated article seems superflous, IMO.--[[User:Robbstrd|Robbstrd]] 01:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
283577 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283576 +++$+++ 283576 +++$+++ 2006-07-18 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.153217040E09 +++$+++ ''Answered at [[Talk:Asmodeus (Dungeons & Dragons)#Asmodai|Talk:Asmodeus (Dungeons & Dragons)]].'' -- +++$+++ :''Answered at [[Talk:Asmodeus (Dungeons & Dragons)#Asmodai|Talk:Asmodeus (Dungeons & Dragons)]].'' --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 03:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

21433 +++$+++ Socrates2008 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21433 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-15 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.210877460E09 +++$+++ Hi Deon, please don't copy\/paste copyright material as you did [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=New_York_Accords&diff=201411998&oldid=181731326 here] from [http:\/\/www.mg.co.za\/articlePage.aspx?articleid=313386&area=\/insight\/insight__comment_and_analysis\/ here].  Cheers <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva\"><font color=\"black\"><font size=\"4\">Socrates2008 (<font size=3> +++$+++ Hi Deon, please don't copy/paste copyright material as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_York_Accords&diff=201411998&oldid=181731326 here] from [http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=313386&area=/insight/insight__comment_and_analysis/ here].  Cheers <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva"><font color="black"><font size="4">Socrates2008 (<font size=3>[[User talk:Socrates2008|Talk]]</font>)</font></font></font> 11:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
21434 +++$+++ Socrates2008 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21433 +++$+++ 21433 +++$+++ 2008-05-15 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.210884000E09 +++$+++ Ooops, sorry, have just realised that you moved it from another article. <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva\"><font color=\"black\"><font size=\"4\">Socrates2008 (<font size=3> +++$+++ :Ooops, sorry, have just realised that you moved it from another article. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva"><font color="black"><font size="4">Socrates2008 (<font size=3>[[User talk:Socrates2008|Talk]]</font>)</font></font></font> 13:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
21435 +++$+++ WJBscribe +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21433 +++$+++ 21434 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.211870880E09 +++$+++ ''For the Mediation Committee,'' <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' <font face="Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</font> 23:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

283578 +++$+++ Su30 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-21 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.153515600E09 +++$+++ The objective result of a football match are the only the goals. There are some great defenders in the game who in that regard, total to only a handful. Do you draw a blank in their cases? Messi's best performance came at Stamford Bridge despite not scoring and he was widely applauded for being the best performer in a big match of many players of repute. If you choose to disregard it, you are missing an important piece of information in a player's career. So when you say you take out POV or speculation, please do that but try to leave the facts and continuity behind :) -- +++$+++ The objective result of a football match are the only the goals. There are some great defenders in the game who in that regard, total to only a handful. Do you draw a blank in their cases? Messi's best performance came at Stamford Bridge despite not scoring and he was widely applauded for being the best performer in a big match of many players of repute. If you choose to disregard it, you are missing an important piece of information in a player's career. So when you say you take out POV or speculation, please do that but try to leave the facts and continuity behind :) --[[User:Su30|Su30]] 14:00, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
283579 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283578 +++$+++ 283578 +++$+++ 2006-07-21 15:37:00 +++$+++ 1.153521420E09 +++$+++ ''(The above message is in reference to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lionel_Messi&diff=next&oldid=61464151 this diff].)'' Hi, thanks for drawing my attention to this. I agree that in retrospect this edit was perhaps overly sweeping; in my defense I quote [[WP:V#Burden_of_evidence|WP:V]] which states that \"The burden of evidence lies with the editors who have made an edit or wish an edit to remain.\" There was a lot of potentially valuable content in the removed paragraph, but no [[WP:RS|sources]] were provided for the opinions, and the language was laudatory and idiomatic rather than encyclopedic and [[WP:NPOV|neutral]]: \"overshadowed the array of established stars\", \"merely to disorient the drawing boards of big name european opponents\", etc. Regarding the continuity issue, I certainly should have retained a mention of his injury in the paragraph, and I've fixed that oversight now. -- +++$+++ :''(The above message is in reference to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lionel_Messi&diff=next&oldid=61464151 this diff].)'' Hi, thanks for drawing my attention to this. I agree that in retrospect this edit was perhaps overly sweeping; in my defense I quote [[WP:V#Burden_of_evidence|WP:V]] which states that "The burden of evidence lies with the editors who have made an edit or wish an edit to remain." There was a lot of potentially valuable content in the removed paragraph, but no [[WP:RS|sources]] were provided for the opinions, and the language was laudatory and idiomatic rather than encyclopedic and [[WP:NPOV|neutral]]: "overshadowed the array of established stars", "merely to disorient the drawing boards of big name european opponents", etc. Regarding the continuity issue, I certainly should have retained a mention of his injury in the paragraph, and I've fixed that oversight now. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 15:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
283580 +++$+++ Su30 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283578 +++$+++ 283579 +++$+++ 2006-07-25 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.153862040E09 +++$+++ hi, glad you added the injury news in. And i've again tried to add the performance content, to highlight the stand out performances\/player characteristics, sans the laudatory language but with out artificial dilutions.. also added citations in support from places like FIFA and Goal.com -- +++$+++ ::hi, glad you added the injury news in. And i've again tried to add the performance content, to highlight the stand out performances/player characteristics, sans the laudatory language but with out artificial dilutions.. also added citations in support from places like FIFA and Goal.com --[[User:Su30|Su30]] 14:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
283581 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283578 +++$+++ 283580 +++$+++ 2006-07-25 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.153869180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your edits, they definitely improve the article. Regards. -- +++$+++ :::Thanks for your edits, they definitely improve the article. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 16:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

545724 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-14 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.231966680E09 +++$+++ I hope you don't mind a little semi...  +++$+++ I hope you don't mind a little semi... [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 12:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
545725 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545724 +++$+++ 545724 +++$+++ 2009-01-14 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.231980240E09 +++$+++ Just don't go any further.  +++$+++ :Just don't go any further. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 16:44, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

283582 +++$+++ Redkane +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-25 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.153879440E09 +++$+++ As per my uploaded images for the related articles in question, what would be some specific or relavent appropriate copyright taggings and descriptions I can use for images representing Wendisch-Rambow (Coat of arms, castle and map), TV series promotional poster in less quallity (the Hotel Babylon one) and appearance at television awards? This seems to trouble me a lot and probably has misjudged you. -- +++$+++ As per my uploaded images for the related articles in question, what would be some specific or relavent appropriate copyright taggings and descriptions I can use for images representing Wendisch-Rambow (Coat of arms, castle and map), TV series promotional poster in less quallity (the Hotel Babylon one) and appearance at television awards? This seems to trouble me a lot and probably has misjudged you. --[[User:Redkane|Redkane]] 19:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
283583 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283582 +++$+++ 283582 +++$+++ 2006-07-25 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.153882440E09 +++$+++ The best way to avoid this problem is to check the source site's terms of service or copyright info before uploading the image to Wikipedia. -- +++$+++ :The best way to avoid this problem is to check the source site's terms of service or copyright info before uploading the image to Wikipedia. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 19:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
283584 +++$+++ Will Beback +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283582 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-08-01 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.154488980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for cleaning up those images. I've added a warning to your message to JarlaxleArtemis. He's on probation for doing just this kind of thing in the past. - +++$+++ :::Thanks for cleaning up those images. I've added a warning to your message to JarlaxleArtemis. He's on probation for doing just this kind of thing in the past. -[[User:Will Beback|Will Beback]] 20:23, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

21439 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-02 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.220391780E09 +++$+++ I hate to remove those links after you dug them up, but all they are is pictures of some nameless person shooting a bow. We need solid, textual references that will satisfy people who don't know any of these people by sight. -- +++$+++ I hate to remove those links after you dug them up, but all they are is pictures of some nameless person shooting a bow. We need solid, textual references that will satisfy people who don't know any of these people by sight. --[[User:Orangemike|<font color="darkorange">Orange Mike</font>]]  |  [[User talk:Orangemike|<font color="orange">Talk</font>]] 14:43, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
21440 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21439 +++$+++ 21439 +++$+++ 2008-09-04 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.220537760E09 +++$+++ I agree that we need proper references, unfortunately I couldn't get in to the win-archery.com site and plonked down those in the mean time... where I'm sure they'd be listed. I'll try again from a difference computer. I see you also restored the ''notability''... that is a bit trickier: used by and sponsor of Olympic champions, but perhaps no news coverage? \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ :I agree that we need proper references, unfortunately I couldn't get in to the win-archery.com site and plonked down those in the mean time... where I'm sure they'd be listed. I'll try again from a difference computer. I see you also restored the ''notability''... that is a bit trickier: used by and sponsor of Olympic champions, but perhaps no news coverage? —&nbsp;[[User:Deon Steyn|Deon Steyn]] ([[User talk:Deon Steyn#top|talk]]) 07:16, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

545728 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-11 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.231746420E09 +++$+++ Hi, Tim, thanks for your contributions in the GA review - it's very magnanimous of you considering the history. BTW re your addition about alt biochems on other planets, are you an astrobiology or science fiction enthusiast? -- +++$+++ Hi, Tim, thanks for your contributions in the GA review - it's very magnanimous of you considering the history. BTW re your addition about alt biochems on other planets, are you an astrobiology or science fiction enthusiast? --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 23:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
545729 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545728 +++$+++ 545728 +++$+++ 2009-01-12 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.231748040E09 +++$+++ My biggest concern (apart from the reviewer's comments) is that the current text provides no opportunity to link to the [[Three domain theory]]. At one stage I wrote a chunk about that, but realised it was far too long - see [[User:Philcha\/Sandbox\/LUCA]]. Can you suggest a good but ''brief'' way to work the 3 domains in? - +++$+++ :My biggest concern (apart from the reviewer's comments) is that the current text provides no opportunity to link to the [[Three domain theory]]. At one stage I wrote a chunk about that, but realised it was far too long - see [[User:Philcha/Sandbox/LUCA]]. Can you suggest a good but ''brief'' way to work the 3 domains in? -[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 00:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
545730 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545728 +++$+++ 545728 +++$+++ 2009-01-15 20:55:00 +++$+++ 1.232081700E09 +++$+++ The whole subject is uncertain - see for example [[Talk:Oxygen_Catastrophe#What_exactly_was_the_.22catastrophe.22_.3F]] - after which [[User:Smith609|Martin]] sent me [[User_talk:Philcha\/Archive_4#Proterozoic_ocean_chemistry...]] \"... is a huge can of worms ...\". -- +++$+++ *The whole subject is uncertain - see for example [[Talk:Oxygen_Catastrophe#What_exactly_was_the_.22catastrophe.22_.3F]] - after which [[User:Smith609|Martin]] sent me [[User_talk:Philcha/Archive_4#Proterozoic_ocean_chemistry...]] "... is a huge can of worms ...". --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 20:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

283585 +++$+++ CuTop +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283585 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-02 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.154585700E09 +++$+++ Per your warning on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:69.14.61.89&diff=60625135&oldid=60608983 this users page], please be informed that the user continues to make disruptive edits to the [[Valet parking]] page without any discussion, rhyme or reason.  +++$+++ Per your warning on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:69.14.61.89&diff=60625135&oldid=60608983 this users page], please be informed that the user continues to make disruptive edits to the [[Valet parking]] page without any discussion, rhyme or reason. [[User:CuTop|CuTop]] 23:15, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
283586 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283585 +++$+++ 283585 +++$+++ 2006-08-08 08:24:00 +++$+++ 1.155050640E09 +++$+++ I've tidied up the talk page and archive and left a note on your talk page about how to archive pages. Regards. -- +++$+++ :I've tidied up the talk page and archive and left a note on your talk page about how to archive pages. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 08:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

283587 +++$+++ Aussie King Pin +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283587 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-20 10:18:00 +++$+++ 1.156094280E09 +++$+++ Look I know you worked on this page but this is useless information.  +++$+++ Look I know you worked on this page but this is useless information. [[User:Aussie King Pin|Aussie King Pin]] 10:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
283588 +++$+++ Jason Palpatine +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283587 +++$+++ 283587 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.156566240E09 +++$+++ I checked the link you listed and I did NOT find Tiamat listed there.  Wik fair use policy states that such images may (as in this instance) be used \"'''for commentary on the character in question.'''\"  What's the problem?  -- +++$+++ :I checked the link you listed and I did NOT find Tiamat listed there.  Wik fair use policy states that such images may (as in this instance) be used "'''for commentary on the character in question.'''"  What's the problem?  --[[User:Jason Palpatine|Jason Palpatine]] 21:24, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
283589 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283587 +++$+++ 283588 +++$+++ 2006-08-25 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.156568460E09 +++$+++ The image is listed near the bottom of the page &ndash; see [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems#2006-08-25]] and scroll down to the images section, or alternately view the listing at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems\/2006 August 25\/Images]]. Please review the July 6 discussion regarding images sourced from the wizards.com website ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems\/2006_July_6\/Images&oldid=63779061 July 6, 2006]) for an explanation of why the use of wizards.com images under the fair use provision is problematic, and also note that the wizards.com [http:\/\/ww2.wizards.com\/Company\/Default.aspx?doc=SiteLegalNotice TOS] expressly prohibits reproduction of the site's contents unless it is for personal, noncommercial use. Feel free to make a case for the image's use at [[WP:CP]]. Regards. -- +++$+++ ::The image is listed near the bottom of the page &ndash; see [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems#2006-08-25]] and scroll down to the images section, or alternately view the listing at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2006 August 25/Images]]. Please review the July 6 discussion regarding images sourced from the wizards.com website ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2006_July_6/Images&oldid=63779061 July 6, 2006]) for an explanation of why the use of wizards.com images under the fair use provision is problematic, and also note that the wizards.com [http://ww2.wizards.com/Company/Default.aspx?doc=SiteLegalNotice TOS] expressly prohibits reproduction of the site's contents unless it is for personal, noncommercial use. Feel free to make a case for the image's use at [[WP:CP]]. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 22:01, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
283590 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283587 +++$+++ 283587 +++$+++ 2006-09-02 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.157247540E09 +++$+++ Hi, no I didn't go to Richwood. My only edits to the [[Richwood High School]] article were vandalism reversions. An anonymous editor [[User:12.203.13.224|{{{2|12.203.13.224}}}]] ([[User talk:12.203.13.224|talk]] \u2022 [[Special:Contributions\/12.203.13.224|contribs]]) added the fight song to the article. -- +++$+++ :Hi, no I didn't go to Richwood. My only edits to the [[Richwood High School]] article were vandalism reversions. An anonymous editor [[User:12.203.13.224|{{{2|12.203.13.224}}}]] ([[User talk:12.203.13.224|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/12.203.13.224|contribs]]) added the fight song to the article. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 18:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
283591 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283587 +++$+++ 283587 +++$+++ 2006-09-09 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.157848920E09 +++$+++ Hi, there are two issues with this image. Firstly, the image is tagged as promotional but it wasn't released for promotional purposes &ndash; it's used to decorate a website. Secondly, the source website's [http:\/\/www.arsenal.com\/article.asp?article=Terms+of+Use+and+Privacy+Policy&Title=Terms+of+Use+and+Privacy+Policy  terms of service] page expressly prohibits recreation of the website's content unless it's for personal use. -- +++$+++ :Hi, there are two issues with this image. Firstly, the image is tagged as promotional but it wasn't released for promotional purposes &ndash; it's used to decorate a website. Secondly, the source website's [http://www.arsenal.com/article.asp?article=Terms+of+Use+and+Privacy+Policy&Title=Terms+of+Use+and+Privacy+Policy  terms of service] page expressly prohibits recreation of the website's content unless it's for personal use. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 17:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
283592 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283587 +++$+++ 283587 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.165443660E09 +++$+++ Addendum: An additional problem is that it's a [[template:replaceable fair use|fair use image]] of a subject for which a free image might reasonably be found or created. -- +++$+++ : Addendum: An additional problem is that it's a [[template:replaceable fair use|fair use image]] of a subject for which a free image might reasonably be found or created. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 14:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

21445 +++$+++ Quaeler +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21445 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-16 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.237233660E09 +++$+++ Hi - I reverted your addition as it featured no references for the data; if you have references please cite them in the re-edit. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi - I reverted your addition as it featured no references for the data; if you have references please cite them in the re-edit. Thanks. [[User:Quaeler|Quaeler]] ([[User talk:Quaeler|talk]]) 13:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
21446 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21445 +++$+++ 21445 +++$+++ 2009-03-18 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.237378980E09 +++$+++ I would ask that you not remove new content simply because it is not cited. A citation request would have been more appropriate and a simple internet search would have revealed many sources for the information. I have revert back to my version and added a citation. \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ :I would ask that you not remove new content simply because it is not cited. A citation request would have been more appropriate and a simple internet search would have revealed many sources for the information. I have revert back to my version and added a citation. —&nbsp;[[User:Deon Steyn|Deon Steyn]] ([[User talk:Deon Steyn#top|talk]]) 05:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

21447 +++$+++ GainLine +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21447 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-29 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.246294320E09 +++$+++ I removed to tricolour from Neil Best and Alan Quinlan as Irish rugby players don't play under the tricolour but rather the IRFU flag which can't be used due to copyright issues.  +++$+++ I removed to tricolour from Neil Best and Alan Quinlan as Irish rugby players don't play under the tricolour but rather the IRFU flag which can't be used due to copyright issues. [[User:GainLine|<font face="jokerman" color="navy">'''G'''<small><s>ain</s></small>'''Line '''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/GainLine|<font color="black">♠</font>]] <sub> [[User talk:GainLine|<font color="red">♥</font>]]</sub> 09:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
21448 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21447 +++$+++ 21447 +++$+++ 2009-06-29 10:03:00 +++$+++ 1.246294980E09 +++$+++ And their nationality? Sorry for the confusion, but the flags are meant to indicate nationality only, not whether the have represented their country. They are Irish citizens? Thanks for the help. \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ :And their nationality? Sorry for the confusion, but the flags are meant to indicate nationality only, not whether the have represented their country. They are Irish citizens? Thanks for the help. —&nbsp;[[User:Deon Steyn|Deon Steyn]] ([[User talk:Deon Steyn#top|talk]]) 10:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
21449 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21447 +++$+++ 21448 +++$+++ 2009-06-29 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.246295460E09 +++$+++ I have restored the flags, Union flag in the case of Best (Northern Ireland) and Ireland flag in the case of Quinlan. In both cases I judged by their place of birth what their nationalities were. \u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ ::I have restored the flags, Union flag in the case of Best (Northern Ireland) and Ireland flag in the case of Quinlan. In both cases I judged by their place of birth what their nationalities were. —&nbsp;[[User:Deon Steyn|Deon Steyn]] ([[User talk:Deon Steyn#top|talk]]) 10:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

283593 +++$+++ Sarah_Ewart +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-24 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.159122000E09 +++$+++ Hey Muchness, thank you for supporting my recent [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Sarah Ewart|RfA]]. It finished with an amazing final tally of 160\/4\/1. I really appreciate your support. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hey Muchness, thank you for supporting my recent [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Sarah Ewart|RfA]]. It finished with an amazing final tally of 160/4/1. I really appreciate your support. Cheers, [[User:Sarah_Ewart|Sarah Ewart]] ([[User talk:Sarah_Ewart|Talk]]) 11:20, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
283594 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283593 +++$+++ 283593 +++$+++ 2006-09-24 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.159125420E09 +++$+++ Congrats and good luck! -- +++$+++ :Congrats and good luck! --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 12:17, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

545738 +++$+++ Levine2112 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545738 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-23 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.232759700E09 +++$+++ I apologize for reverting your bold merger. I feel that this discussion is too young to decide on a consensus just yet. I would prefer if we took the matter to AfD with a formal \"merge\" request. That said, I would be in favor of merge if we went the other way and merged \"Chiropractic education\" into \"Doctor of Chiropractic\". In terms of [[WP:N]], I believe that the degree is much more notable than the education. Anyhow, I hope you understand my rationale for reverting. Thanks! :-) -- <b><font color=\"996600\" face=\"times new roman,times,serif\"> +++$+++ I apologize for reverting your bold merger. I feel that this discussion is too young to decide on a consensus just yet. I would prefer if we took the matter to AfD with a formal "merge" request. That said, I would be in favor of merge if we went the other way and merged "Chiropractic education" into "Doctor of Chiropractic". In terms of [[WP:N]], I believe that the degree is much more notable than the education. Anyhow, I hope you understand my rationale for reverting. Thanks! :-) -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">[[User:Levine2112|Levine2112]]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">[[User talk:Levine2112|discuss]]</font></sup> 17:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
545739 +++$+++ Levine2112 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545738 +++$+++ 545738 +++$+++ 2009-01-23 21:27:00 +++$+++ 1.232774820E09 +++$+++ Whoa! I guess you didn't <s>understand<\/s> agree with my rationale for reverting. Sorry! Per your instructions, I reverted my revert. -- <b><font color=\"996600\" face=\"times new roman,times,serif\"> +++$+++ : Whoa! I guess you didn't <s>understand</s> agree with my rationale for reverting. Sorry! Per your instructions, I reverted my revert. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">[[User:Levine2112|Levine2112]]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">[[User talk:Levine2112|discuss]]</font></sup> 21:27, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

283595 +++$+++ Mark83 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283595 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-13 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.160775060E09 +++$+++ Hi. Just thought you'd like to know that this user is questioning your motives for filing a 3RR violation. He seems to be accusing you, me or both of us of something underhand. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/3RR&diff=81202761&oldid=81201426]. I have also challenged his accusation that I violated the 3RR. Regards  +++$+++ Hi. Just thought you'd like to know that this user is questioning your motives for filing a 3RR violation. He seems to be accusing you, me or both of us of something underhand. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&diff=81202761&oldid=81201426]. I have also challenged his accusation that I violated the 3RR. Regards [[User:Mark83|Mark83]] 14:31, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
283596 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283595 +++$+++ 283595 +++$+++ 2006-10-14 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.160816340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up. The issue appears to have been resolved[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2F3RR&diff=81227038&oldid=81224028]. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up. The issue appears to have been resolved[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2F3RR&diff=81227038&oldid=81224028]. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 01:59, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

283597 +++$+++ JHunterJ +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-21 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.161461580E09 +++$+++ I saw Centrx's revert of my revert, and I was hopeful another editor would undo it, so it wouldn't look like mine was a lone opinion.  Thanks for doing that. --  +++$+++ I saw Centrx's revert of my revert, and I was hopeful another editor would undo it, so it wouldn't look like mine was a lone opinion.  Thanks for doing that. -- [[User:JHunterJ|JHunterJ]] 13:13, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
283598 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283597 +++$+++ 283597 +++$+++ 2006-10-21 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.161475080E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. In general I think Centrx is an excellent admin, I just feel this particular edit needs some prior talk page discussion before we consider adding it to the guideline. -- +++$+++ :You're welcome. In general I think Centrx is an excellent admin, I just feel this particular edit needs some prior talk page discussion before we consider adding it to the guideline. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 16:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

283599 +++$+++ Orangemike +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283599 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-30 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.162252440E09 +++$+++ You've just removed most of the links I added to various other D&D items, for things like the group [[Dead Alewives]] and so on. Why do you deem these links \"excessive\"? I'd thought that they were highly appropriate, but I'm always glad to learn new things.-- +++$+++ You've just removed most of the links I added to various other D&D items, for things like the group [[Dead Alewives]] and so on. Why do you deem these links "excessive"? I'd thought that they were highly appropriate, but I'm always glad to learn new things.--[[User:Orangemike|Orange Mike]] 15:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
283600 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283599 +++$+++ 283599 +++$+++ 2006-10-30 16:13:00 +++$+++ 1.162253580E09 +++$+++ Hi. This is a disambiguation page, so in general it should be formatted according to the [[MoS:DAB]] guidelines. See the section on [[MoS:DAB#Individual entries|individual entries]] for the relevant guideline: \"Each bulleted entry should, in almost every case, have exactly one navigable (blue) link.\" For further discussion, see the related [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#One link per entry?|talk page discussion]]. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hi. This is a disambiguation page, so in general it should be formatted according to the [[MoS:DAB]] guidelines. See the section on [[MoS:DAB#Individual entries|individual entries]] for the relevant guideline: "Each bulleted entry should, in almost every case, have exactly one navigable (blue) link." For further discussion, see the related [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#One link per entry?|talk page discussion]]. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 16:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

21456 +++$+++ Ng.j +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21456 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-18 23:55:00 +++$+++ 1.311058500E09 +++$+++ I like the way you charted the deliveries. The way I had set it up just didn't look right, but I didn't really have any idea how to proceed. I will probably port this over to other aircraft pages I work on. Thanks again!  +++$+++ I like the way you charted the deliveries. The way I had set it up just didn't look right, but I didn't really have any idea how to proceed. I will probably port this over to other aircraft pages I work on. Thanks again! [[User:Ng.j|Ng.j]] ([[User talk:Ng.j|talk]]) 23:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
21457 +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ Deon Steyn +++$+++ 21456 +++$+++ 21456 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.311091320E09 +++$+++ No worries, glad you like it. It's something I've used before and I prefer it to some graphics, because it's easier for someone else to add another row in future.&nbsp;\u2014&nbsp; +++$+++ :No worries, glad you like it. It's something I've used before and I prefer it to some graphics, because it's easier for someone else to add another row in future.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Deon Steyn|Deon Steyn]] ([[User talk:Deon Steyn#top|talk]]) 09:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

283601 +++$+++ Gcoliveira +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-03 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.162570440E09 +++$+++ I wanna thank you for the revert in [[Dourado]] disambigation page. I didnt know about one navigable link per entry \"rule\" for disambigs, and this is extremely correct since disambigs are made to choose one and not to distract with other info. Now its time to review all the disambigs I've been editing!!! Tks,  +++$+++ I wanna thank you for the revert in [[Dourado]] disambigation page. I didnt know about one navigable link per entry "rule" for disambigs, and this is extremely correct since disambigs are made to choose one and not to distract with other info. Now its time to review all the disambigs I've been editing!!! Tks, [[User:Gcoliveira|Gcoliveira]] 08:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
283602 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283601 +++$+++ 283601 +++$+++ 2006-11-03 08:34:00 +++$+++ 1.162571640E09 +++$+++ No problem. -- +++$+++ :No problem. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 08:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

21459 +++$+++ Sophus Bie +++$+++ Carmichael95 +++$+++ 21459 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-17 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.300371900E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I notice that you're hard at work with vandalism patrol this evening. I think that you deserve a barnstar for your efforts!  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I notice that you're hard at work with vandalism patrol this evening. I think that you deserve a barnstar for your efforts! [[User:Sophus Bie|''<font color="187ba0" size="2px">Sophus Bie</font>'']] <sup>([[User talk:Sophus Bie|talk]])</sup> 07:25, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
21460 +++$+++ Carmichael95 +++$+++ Carmichael95 +++$+++ 21459 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-03-27 00:31:00 +++$+++ 1.301211060E09 +++$+++ It seems that the facts you were adding might have been considered vandalism as you are currently blocked for it. Although they were facts, they might not have been needed in that specific article.  +++$+++ ::It seems that the facts you were adding might have been considered vandalism as you are currently blocked for it. Although they were facts, they might not have been needed in that specific article. [[User:Carmichael95|Carmichael95]] <span style="font-size:70%">[[User talk:Carmichael95|[TALK]]] | [[Special:Contributions/Carmichael95|[CONTRIBS]]]</span> 00:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

21461 +++$+++ Egg Centric +++$+++ Carmichael95 +++$+++ 21461 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-27 00:37:00 +++$+++ 1.301211420E09 +++$+++ Naturally, tisn't your fault, and it's certainly my responsibility. But unusually for an automated tool user (heh!) I'm very careful about what I'm doing so there is some digging to be done, as I'm fairly sure I wouldn't have made that sort of mistake, so I need to look at the circumstances to see if it was Stiki or me. Nevertheless, it certainly shouldn't have happened, and consequently please do accept my apologies. Keep up the good work! :) <span style=\"background-color:silver;color:black;\"> +++$+++ Naturally, tisn't your fault, and it's certainly my responsibility. But unusually for an automated tool user (heh!) I'm very careful about what I'm doing so there is some digging to be done, as I'm fairly sure I wouldn't have made that sort of mistake, so I need to look at the circumstances to see if it was Stiki or me. Nevertheless, it certainly shouldn't have happened, and consequently please do accept my apologies. Keep up the good work! :) <span style="background-color:silver;color:black;">[[User:Egg Centric|Egg]] [[User_talk:Egg Centric|Centric]]</span> 00:37, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
21462 +++$+++ Egg Centric +++$+++ Carmichael95 +++$+++ 21461 +++$+++ 21461 +++$+++ 2011-03-27 00:40:00 +++$+++ 1.301211600E09 +++$+++ Addition: Yes, seems bizarre. There was definitely an automatic warning given to yourself, but I can't see why it happened; furthermore, if the tool is working correctly then it will only give you a warning if it is reverting something. So I will take it to the tool's creator and we'll see what happens. Again, ever so sorry about this. <span style=\"background-color:silver;color:black;\"> +++$+++ :Addition: Yes, seems bizarre. There was definitely an automatic warning given to yourself, but I can't see why it happened; furthermore, if the tool is working correctly then it will only give you a warning if it is reverting something. So I will take it to the tool's creator and we'll see what happens. Again, ever so sorry about this. <span style="background-color:silver;color:black;">[[User:Egg Centric|Egg]] [[User_talk:Egg Centric|Centric]]</span> 00:40, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

283606 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283606 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-24 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.164412140E09 +++$+++ Yep, apparently I forgot the other one. Done now. Thanks for telling me. Regards.--<strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ Yep, apparently I forgot the other one. Done now. Thanks for telling me. Regards.--<strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 15:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
283607 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283606 +++$+++ 283606 +++$+++ 2006-11-24 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.164412200E09 +++$+++ No problem. -- +++$+++ :No problem. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 15:50, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
283608 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283606 +++$+++ 283606 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.172258400E09 +++$+++ Hello, firstly, I am not an admin, I'm an editor just like you. My edit wasn't related to your site's content, it was simply following the Wikipedia guideline that states that you should not link to a site you own or maintain. If you see other links added by the site's owner, feel free to remove them, and as I said earlier, if you feel this link is appropriate and useful, please suggest it for inclusion on the article's talk page. -- +++$+++ :Hello, firstly, I am not an admin, I'm an editor just like you. My edit wasn't related to your site's content, it was simply following the Wikipedia guideline that states that you should not link to a site you own or maintain. If you see other links added by the site's owner, feel free to remove them, and as I said earlier, if you feel this link is appropriate and useful, please suggest it for inclusion on the article's talk page. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 11:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
283609 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283606 +++$+++ 283608 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.172259600E09 +++$+++ It's no problem at all. I will raise the issue on the article's talk page; a third party editor may want to add a link back to your site. -- +++$+++ ::It's no problem at all. I will raise the issue on the article's talk page; a third party editor may want to add a link back to your site. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 11:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

21466 +++$+++ Kayau +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21466 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-24 01:23:00 +++$+++ 1.279959780E09 +++$+++ Is silliwili active? It's now July, and March has not been decided... '''[[User:Kayau|<span style=\"color:navy\"> Kayau <\/span>]]''' ''[[User talk:Kayau|Voting]]''  [[Special:Contributions\/Kayau|<span style=\"color:red\">IS<\/span>]]  <small>  +++$+++ Is silliwili active? It's now July, and March has not been decided... '''[[User:Kayau|<span style="color:navy"> Kayau </span>]]''' ''[[User talk:Kayau|Voting]]''  [[Special:Contributions/Kayau|<span style="color:red">IS</span>]]  <small> [[User:Kayau/guestbook|evil]] </small> 01:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
21467 +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21466 +++$+++ 21466 +++$+++ 2010-07-27 16:30:00 +++$+++ 1.280273400E09 +++$+++ The contest is indeed active, although my own inactivity has unfortunately caused judging to be suspended in the last few months. [[User talk:Tony1\/Silliest wikilink of the month award#Announcement: new judge|It seems that this is about to change, however]].  +++$+++ : The contest is indeed active, although my own inactivity has unfortunately caused judging to be suspended in the last few months. [[User talk:Tony1/Silliest wikilink of the month award#Announcement: new judge|It seems that this is about to change, however]]. [[User:The Duke of Waltham|Waltham]], <small>[[User talk:The Duke of Waltham|''The Duke of'']]</small> 16:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
21468 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21466 +++$+++ 21466 +++$+++ 2010-08-05 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.280999760E09 +++$+++ Please forgive the talk page spam. There are new userbox and topicon selections for editors who identify themselves as WikiGryphons; see [[User:Ling.Nut\/Gryphontopicon2]] and [[:Template:User wikipedia\/Gryphon2]]. Cheers! &bull;&nbsp; +++$+++ * Please forgive the talk page spam. There are new userbox and topicon selections for editors who identify themselves as WikiGryphons; see [[User:Ling.Nut/Gryphontopicon2]] and [[:Template:User wikipedia/Gryphon2]]. Cheers! &bull;&nbsp;[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 02:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
21469 +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21466 +++$+++ 21468 +++$+++ 2010-08-05 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.281020040E09 +++$+++ It's not a problem; I don't receive much of it, anyway. Now, I might use the top-icon, but I'll have to think about it...  +++$+++ ** It's not a problem; I don't receive much of it, anyway. Now, I might use the top-icon, but I'll have to think about it... [[User:The Duke of Waltham|Waltham]], <small>[[User talk:The Duke of Waltham|''The Duke of'']]</small> 07:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

283612 +++$+++ Viridae +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283612 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-02 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.165058580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for reporting that vandal, they were on quite a spree - the admin rollback tool is very handy!  +++$+++ Thanks for reporting that vandal, they were on quite a spree - the admin rollback tool is very handy! [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 03:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
283613 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283612 +++$+++ 283612 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 03:29:00 +++$+++ 1.165058940E09 +++$+++ No problem :) -- +++$+++ :No problem :) --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 03:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

21470 +++$+++ Bodnotbod +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-13 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.281712860E09 +++$+++ Hello. I have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)\/Persistent_proposals#.22Categorised_.28user_defined.29.22_or_.22split_.28user_defined.29.22_watchlists.3B_an_idea_previously_proposed_as_.22multiple_watchlists.22 revived a discussion] you took part in back in 2008. It's about improving watchlists to allow a little more user control. Perhaps you would like to contribute? -- +++$+++ Hello. I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Persistent_proposals#.22Categorised_.28user_defined.29.22_or_.22split_.28user_defined.29.22_watchlists.3B_an_idea_previously_proposed_as_.22multiple_watchlists.22 revived a discussion] you took part in back in 2008. It's about improving watchlists to allow a little more user control. Perhaps you would like to contribute? --[[User:Bodnotbod|bodnotbod]] ([[User talk:Bodnotbod|talk]]) 08:21, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
21471 +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21470 +++$+++ 21470 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.281715320E09 +++$+++ Perhaps... We'll see if I'll have something useful to say, but I am definitely interested in following the discussion. Thank you for the heads-up.  +++$+++ : Perhaps... We'll see if I'll have something useful to say, but I am definitely interested in following the discussion. Thank you for the heads-up. [[User:The Duke of Waltham|Waltham]], <small>[[User talk:The Duke of Waltham|''The Duke of'']]</small> 09:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

21473 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-18 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.282172160E09 +++$+++ I have just remembered that His Grace showed interest in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29&oldid=379486296#Random_Article_-_filter_out_the_ugliest_ducklings poor quality articles]. -- +++$+++ I have just remembered that His Grace showed interest in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29&oldid=379486296#Random_Article_-_filter_out_the_ugliest_ducklings poor quality articles]. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 15:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
21474 +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21473 +++$+++ 21473 +++$+++ 2010-08-28 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.283061720E09 +++$+++ Actually, I don't remember exactly how or why I started editing (what I said in that discussion was that I assume most editors started contributing that way\u2014I was speaking from extensive second-hand experience). What I know is that [[User:The Duke of Waltham\/User page#Accounts and contribution history|I discovered Wikipedia through a mirror]], and that some time later I started editing; there is a large blank between these two events, and I cannot say whether I made some edits anonymously before creating my previous account, though I do remember that I spent some time reading whatever I could find in the way of policies and guidelines (which were certainly not as substantial in 2004 as they are today). In any case, I spent most of my early Wikipedian career as a WikiGnome, and later also as a participant in project discussions, with varying results. It is easy to imagine that I started editing when I noticed a few typos littering an article, or that certain things were out of order and I could tidy them up. I still like this kind of work, though I no longer dismiss reference work as being beyond my capabilities. However, I observed the workings of article-writing for years before starting to contribute content myself, and so I really cannot contribute much to your project. Still, interesting essay; it looks quite helpful, especially thanks to its structure and tone.  +++$+++ : Actually, I don't remember exactly how or why I started editing (what I said in that discussion was that I assume most editors started contributing that way—I was speaking from extensive second-hand experience). What I know is that [[User:The Duke of Waltham/User page#Accounts and contribution history|I discovered Wikipedia through a mirror]], and that some time later I started editing; there is a large blank between these two events, and I cannot say whether I made some edits anonymously before creating my previous account, though I do remember that I spent some time reading whatever I could find in the way of policies and guidelines (which were certainly not as substantial in 2004 as they are today). In any case, I spent most of my early Wikipedian career as a WikiGnome, and later also as a participant in project discussions, with varying results. It is easy to imagine that I started editing when I noticed a few typos littering an article, or that certain things were out of order and I could tidy them up. I still like this kind of work, though I no longer dismiss reference work as being beyond my capabilities. However, I observed the workings of article-writing for years before starting to contribute content myself, and so I really cannot contribute much to your project. Still, interesting essay; it looks quite helpful, especially thanks to its structure and tone. [[User:The Duke of Waltham|Waltham]], <small>[[User talk:The Duke of Waltham|''The Duke of'']]</small> 23:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

21475 +++$+++ markdask +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21475 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-05 17:23:00 +++$+++ 1.283732580E09 +++$+++ Yo Waltham - please read my last entry on the (proposals) page - based on 10 random articles.  View the 10 articles and my comments and consider it my revision. - please reply on that page - regards  +++$+++ Yo Waltham - please read my last entry on the (proposals) page - based on 10 random articles.  View the 10 articles and my comments and consider it my revision. - please reply on that page - regards [[User:markdask|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''Mark'''</font>]]<small>[[User talk:markdask|<sup>'''Dask'''</sup>]]</small> 17:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
21476 +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21475 +++$+++ 21475 +++$+++ 2010-09-08 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.283981640E09 +++$+++ Noted. I'll have a look as soon as I can.  +++$+++ : Noted. I'll have a look as soon as I can. [[User:The Duke of Waltham|Waltham]], <small>[[User talk:The Duke of Waltham|''The Duke of'']]</small> 14:34, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
21477 +++$+++ markdask +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21475 +++$+++ 21476 +++$+++ 2010-09-13 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.284425100E09 +++$+++ Mmmm - the proposal has moved on since then and I had hoped for your further contribution - no matter -  +++$+++ ::Mmmm - the proposal has moved on since then and I had hoped for your further contribution - no matter - [[User:markdask|<font face="verdana" color="green">'''Mark'''</font>]]<small>[[User talk:markdask|<sup>'''Dask'''</sup>]]</small> 17:45, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

283621 +++$+++ Unschool +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283621 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-23 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.166871840E09 +++$+++ Frankly, it appears to me that you a) didn't read my edit and give it its due consideration, and\/or b) misunderstood my edit summary.  I say this because, for the life of me, I don't see what you can think I did wrong.  I adhered to the MoS, as you rightly insisted, but created a better-written entry.  Please explain to me exactly what your problem is; otherwise I intend to revert your poorly-considered edit.   +++$+++ Frankly, it appears to me that you a) didn't read my edit and give it its due consideration, and/or b) misunderstood my edit summary.  I say this because, for the life of me, I don't see what you can think I did wrong.  I adhered to the MoS, as you rightly insisted, but created a better-written entry.  Please explain to me exactly what your problem is; otherwise I intend to revert your poorly-considered edit.  [[User:Unschool|Unschool]] 03:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
283622 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283621 +++$+++ 283621 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.166873160E09 +++$+++ That's a fair criticism, perhaps my edit did not give due consideration. To be specific, my problems were that a) dab page entries should consists of a sentence fragment with no period at the end of the line, and b) for links to biographies, it's standard to include birth and death dates in parentheses after the wikilink. I've restored your wording with the above minor issues addressed. Regards. -- +++$+++ :That's a fair criticism, perhaps my edit did not give due consideration. To be specific, my problems were that a) dab page entries should consists of a sentence fragment with no period at the end of the line, and b) for links to biographies, it's standard to include birth and death dates in parentheses after the wikilink. I've restored your wording with the above minor issues addressed. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 03:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

21478 +++$+++  +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21478 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-07 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.291792020E09 +++$+++ Mr Cartwright, I've just edited the succession box on the article [[Prince Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge]] and amn't sure how best to handle that three rows, all separated by headers, have the same successor (his son, [[Prince George, Duke of Cambridge]]). I've [[Talk:Prince_Adolphus,_Duke_of_Cambridge#Succession_box|posted this to the article's Talk: page]], where I would like to canvas opinion. If you could make any suggestions His Grace might have in that place, I would be most grateful. Of course, if His Grace has any comments he would like to make that are not pertinent to that issue, then I would be pleased to see them on mine own Talk: page. \u2014 [[:en:User:OwenBlacker|OwenBlacker]] ([[:en:User talk:OwenBlacker|Talk]]) 23:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC) +++$+++ Mr Cartwright, I've just edited the succession box on the article [[Prince Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge]] and amn't sure how best to handle that three rows, all separated by headers, have the same successor (his son, [[Prince George, Duke of Cambridge]]). I've [[Talk:Prince_Adolphus,_Duke_of_Cambridge#Succession_box|posted this to the article's Talk: page]], where I would like to canvas opinion. If you could make any suggestions His Grace might have in that place, I would be most grateful. Of course, if His Grace has any comments he would like to make that are not pertinent to that issue, then I would be pleased to see them on mine own Talk: page. — [[:en:User:OwenBlacker|OwenBlacker]] ([[:en:User talk:OwenBlacker|Talk]]) 23:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
21479 +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21478 +++$+++ 21478 +++$+++ 2010-12-09 18:36:00 +++$+++ 1.291948560E09 +++$+++ His Grace will look into it tomorrow. ''H. Cartwright'', <small>on behalf of  +++$+++ : His Grace will look into it tomorrow. ''H. Cartwright'', <small>on behalf of [[User talk:The Duke of Waltham|the Duke of Waltham]]</small> 18:36, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

283623 +++$+++ Matthuxtable +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283623 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-23 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.166920920E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Matthuxtable|Matthuxtable]] 16:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
283624 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283623 +++$+++ 283623 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 16:46:00 +++$+++ 1.166921160E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the note, I will be sure to use the appropriate tag in future. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the note, I will be sure to use the appropriate tag in future. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 16:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
283625 +++$+++ Matthuxtable +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283623 +++$+++ 283624 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.166921220E09 +++$+++ Hi. That's OK. There's a page full of speedy deletion templates here: [[CAT:SDT]] - It's very, very useful!  +++$+++ ::Hi. That's OK. There's a page full of speedy deletion templates here: [[CAT:SDT]] - It's very, very useful! [[User:Matthuxtable|Matthuxtable]] 16:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
283626 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283623 +++$+++ 283625 +++$+++ 2006-12-23 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.166921340E09 +++$+++ I've been using [[WP:SPEEDY]] for reference, but I overlooked that template. Thanks again. -- +++$+++ :::I've been using [[WP:SPEEDY]] for reference, but I overlooked that template. Thanks again. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 16:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

21480 +++$+++ Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21480 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-22 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.293087240E09 +++$+++ Hi, you were kind enough to respond to an inquiry I posted on the [[WT:SBS#Chart succession header|SBS talk page]] back in August. I was wondering what you think of the use of succession on articles for songs and albums such as [[I Will Always Love You#Chart procession and succession|I Will Always Love You]], [[Tik Tok (song)#Chart precession|Tik Tok]], and [[The E.N.D.#Chart procession and succession|The E.N.D.]]. There is currently on RFC taking place regarding their use at [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (record charts)#Request for comment: Use of succession boxes]], and a third-party neutral opinion would be greatly appreciated. At this time, I'm just hoping to get resolution on whether they are even needed for these types of articles regarding, and deal with guidelines and stylizing afterwards should the outcome favor them. The argument is pretty much down the middle unfortunately. Thanks. -- +++$+++ Hi, you were kind enough to respond to an inquiry I posted on the [[WT:SBS#Chart succession header|SBS talk page]] back in August. I was wondering what you think of the use of succession on articles for songs and albums such as [[I Will Always Love You#Chart procession and succession|I Will Always Love You]], [[Tik Tok (song)#Chart precession|Tik Tok]], and [[The E.N.D.#Chart procession and succession|The E.N.D.]]. There is currently on RFC taking place regarding their use at [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (record charts)#Request for comment: Use of succession boxes]], and a third-party neutral opinion would be greatly appreciated. At this time, I'm just hoping to get resolution on whether they are even needed for these types of articles regarding, and deal with guidelines and stylizing afterwards should the outcome favor them. The argument is pretty much down the middle unfortunately. Thanks. --[[User:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars|Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars]] ([[User talk:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars|talk]]) 22:54, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
21481 +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21480 +++$+++ 21480 +++$+++ 2011-01-01 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.293953640E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid I have not been able to look at it yet. I hope to do so soon, though I cannot promise anything\u2014there are many distractions these days...  +++$+++ : I'm afraid I have not been able to look at it yet. I hope to do so soon, though I cannot promise anything—there are many distractions these days... [[User:The Duke of Waltham|Waltham]], <small>[[User talk:The Duke of Waltham|''The Duke of'']]</small> 23:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

545769 +++$+++ Tarashawne +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545769 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-18 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.234946940E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Tarashawne|Tarashawne]] ([[User talk:Tarashawne|talk]]) 00:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
545770 +++$+++ Ling.Nut +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545769 +++$+++ 545769 +++$+++ 2009-02-19 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.235066880E09 +++$+++ Your input is requested, either [[Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates#FAC_symposium|Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates#FAC_symposium]] or at the subpage where the effort will begin... Thanks! [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash; +++$+++ * Your input is requested, either [[Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates#FAC_symposium|Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates#FAC_symposium]] or at the subpage where the effort will begin... Thanks! [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] <sup>([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]&mdash;[[User:Ling.Nut/3IAR|WP:3IAR]])</sup> 10:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

21483 +++$+++ Danbarnesdavies +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21483 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-03 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.304485080E09 +++$+++ Hullo there. I have opened a new discussion about the styling of HRH The Earl of Wessex's children: [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject British Royalty#Wessex children NPOV|here]] because their articles are currently in violation of the ''[[WP:NPOV|NPOV policy]]''. Do please drop by and have your say (and feel free to pass on the word to other concerned parties!) &#10013;''' +++$+++ Hullo there. I have opened a new discussion about the styling of HRH The Earl of Wessex's children: [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject British Royalty#Wessex children NPOV|here]] because their articles are currently in violation of the ''[[WP:NPOV|NPOV policy]]''. Do please drop by and have your say (and feel free to pass on the word to other concerned parties!) &#10013;'''[[User:Danbarnesdavies|D]][[User talk:Danbarnesdavies|B]][[Special:Contributions/Danbarnesdavies|D]]''' 21:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
21484 +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ The Duke of Waltham +++$+++ 21483 +++$+++ 21483 +++$+++ 2011-05-21 00:17:00 +++$+++ 1.305962220E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid that my response to your message has been something of a disappointment (it's a common pattern these months). I had a look at the discussion a few days after you posted here, but by the time I found the opportunity to comment on the page, it was already too late. For all it's worth, I believe that the two articles in their current state are perfectly acceptable with regards to the issue you have brought up.  +++$+++ : I'm afraid that my response to your message has been something of a disappointment (it's a common pattern these months). I had a look at the discussion a few days after you posted here, but by the time I found the opportunity to comment on the page, it was already too late. For all it's worth, I believe that the two articles in their current state are perfectly acceptable with regards to the issue you have brought up. [[User:The Duke of Waltham|Waltham]], <small>[[User talk:The Duke of Waltham|''The Duke of'']]</small> 00:17, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

21485 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21485 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-23 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.224800280E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, Wikipedia policy overrules personal opinion in this particular instance. As I said before, I know little or nothing about the subject, so you might want to ask [[WP:TV]]. I can tell you, however, that unless the episode becomes notable after its airing date, it is likely to remain deleted. Cheers, &ndash; +++$+++ Unfortunately, Wikipedia policy overrules personal opinion in this particular instance. As I said before, I know little or nothing about the subject, so you might want to ask [[WP:TV]]. I can tell you, however, that unless the episode becomes notable after its airing date, it is likely to remain deleted. Cheers, &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 15:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
21486 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21485 +++$+++ 21485 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.224806340E09 +++$+++ Not if I give you a reliable source for that episode, it won't. Here it is: http:\/\/www.tv.com\/desperate-housewives\/mirror-mirror\/episode\/1231080\/summary.html Will you accept this reliable source so that the \"Mirror, Mirror\" page will be re-created, yes or no?  +++$+++ :Not if I give you a reliable source for that episode, it won't. Here it is: http://www.tv.com/desperate-housewives/mirror-mirror/episode/1231080/summary.html Will you accept this reliable source so that the "Mirror, Mirror" page will be re-created, yes or no? [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 16:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
21487 +++$+++ Xenocidic +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21485 +++$+++ 21486 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.224806760E09 +++$+++ I think you aren't quite understanding the fact that the ''individual episode'' must itself be '''notable''' on its own, simply airing on television does not make it so. You really ought review [[WP:EPISODE]] for more on this. \u2013<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::I think you aren't quite understanding the fact that the ''individual episode'' must itself be '''notable''' on its own, simply airing on television does not make it so. You really ought review [[WP:EPISODE]] for more on this. –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 17:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
21488 +++$+++ a +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21485 +++$+++ 21487 +++$+++ 2008-10-24 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.224884100E09 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall, you must understand that the episode itself isn't notable. You should wait until after it airs. Btw, tv.com was dubbed an unreliable source, due to the fact you could edit it yourself.  +++$+++ :::AdamDeanHall, you must understand that the episode itself isn't notable. You should wait until after it airs. Btw, tv.com was dubbed an unreliable source, due to the fact you could edit it yourself. [[User:A|<font color="cornflowerblue">A]]</font> <sub>[[User talk:A|<font color="cornflowerblue">talk</font>]]</sub> 14:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
21489 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21485 +++$+++ 21488 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.225060380E09 +++$+++ I, as well as other editors, have explained this several times. The individual episode has to be notable be itself for an article to be created. &ndash; +++$+++ ::::I, as well as other editors, have explained this several times. The individual episode has to be notable be itself for an article to be created. &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 15:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
21490 +++$+++ Juliancolton +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21485 +++$+++ 21489 +++$+++ 2008-10-27 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.225159020E09 +++$+++ I've told you several times; unless the episode has gained notability last night, you should do nothing. Thank you. &ndash; +++$+++ :::::I've told you several times; unless the episode has gained notability last night, you should do nothing. Thank you. &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 18:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

283630 +++$+++ Sweetaurora +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283630 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-10 00:04:00 +++$+++ 1.168416240E09 +++$+++ I am having trouble finding the exact answer to my question-- how exactly can the author propose an article for speedy deletion? I feel I'm being attacked on something I wrote, and tried to make the deletion page private in good faith, but errored against apparent Wikipedia policy. I just want it to be private or deleted altogether, as it's coming up in search engine results. I apologize if the answer is right under my nose in the help topics--I have not had a great experience with this site. Thanks.  +++$+++ I am having trouble finding the exact answer to my question-- how exactly can the author propose an article for speedy deletion? I feel I'm being attacked on something I wrote, and tried to make the deletion page private in good faith, but errored against apparent Wikipedia policy. I just want it to be private or deleted altogether, as it's coming up in search engine results. I apologize if the answer is right under my nose in the help topics--I have not had a great experience with this site. Thanks. [[User:Sweetaurora|Sweetaurora]] 00:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
283631 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283630 +++$+++ 283630 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.168423020E09 +++$+++ Hi, if you are the author of an article, and you created the article mistakenly, you can request speedy deletion per [[WP:CSD#G7|CSD G7]]. Add this tag to the article: <code><nowiki>{{db-author}}<\/nowiki><\/code>. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hi, if you are the author of an article, and you created the article mistakenly, you can request speedy deletion per [[WP:CSD#G7|CSD G7]]. Add this tag to the article: <code><nowiki>{{db-author}}</nowiki></code>. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 01:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
283632 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283630 +++$+++ 283630 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.168696140E09 +++$+++ Thank you for bringing those images to my attention, I've tagged them as replaceable fair use images. Like the Dan Carter image, these are also incorrectly tagged as promotional images &ndash; they are not part of a press release or media kit; they are used to decorate a website. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for bringing those images to my attention, I've tagged them as replaceable fair use images. Like the Dan Carter image, these are also incorrectly tagged as promotional images &ndash; they are not part of a press release or media kit; they are used to decorate a website. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 05:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
283633 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283630 +++$+++ 283632 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.168698420E09 +++$+++ I'll look into it, thank you. -- +++$+++ ::I'll look into it, thank you. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 06:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

545776 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545776 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-24 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.235530080E09 +++$+++ Isn't that a little extreme? \u2013<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ Isn't that a little extreme? –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xeno|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Xeno|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 18:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
545777 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545776 +++$+++ 545776 +++$+++ 2009-02-24 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.235530380E09 +++$+++ If it's OK with you, I'd like to drop them down to 1 year. \u2013<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :If it's OK with you, I'd like to drop them down to 1 year. –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xeno|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Xeno|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 18:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
545778 +++$+++ xeno +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545776 +++$+++ 545777 +++$+++ 2009-02-24 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.235530620E09 +++$+++ yep, i guess like that one on your user page =] cute one. \u2013<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::yep, i guess like that one on your user page =] cute one. –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xeno|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Xeno|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 18:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

283634 +++$+++  +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283634 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-14 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.168799820E09 +++$+++ This users has link-spammed [[Mensa International]] again (4th time?) ... I've reverted it, but you have already warned them about it, so I'll let you take it to the next level. &mdash;{{user|72.75.126.37}} 10:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ This users has link-spammed [[Mensa International]] again (4th time?) ... I've reverted it, but you have already warned them about it, so I'll let you take it to the next level. &mdash;{{user|72.75.126.37}} 10:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
283635 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283634 +++$+++ 283634 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.168805520E09 +++$+++ The editor has been blocked for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:83.140.16.152 31 hours]. If he resumes spamming after his block expires, you can file a report at [[WP:AIV]]. -- +++$+++ :The editor has been blocked for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:83.140.16.152 31 hours]. If he resumes spamming after his block expires, you can file a report at [[WP:AIV]]. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 12:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
283636 +++$+++ 72.75.126.37 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283634 +++$+++ 283635 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.168824480E09 +++$+++ Thnx ... would you please indicate that block on their talk page as well, so that other editors will know about it if it happens again? -- +++$+++ ::Thnx ... would you please indicate that block on their talk page as well, so that other editors will know about it if it happens again? --[[User:72.75.126.37|72.75.126.37]] 17:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
283637 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283634 +++$+++ 283636 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 18:03:00 +++$+++ 1.168826580E09 +++$+++ Ok, I'll add a {{[[Template:spam5|spam5]]}} notice. -- +++$+++ :::Ok, I'll add a {{[[Template:spam5|spam5]]}} notice. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 18:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

21491 +++$+++ Mrschimpf +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21491 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-26 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.225076880E09 +++$+++ The cite is within This TV's infobox and I though I added it within the article body. <font face=\"Myriad Web\">''' +++$+++ The cite is within This TV's infobox and I though I added it within the article body. <font face="Myriad Web">'''[[User:Mrschimpf|<span style="color:maroon">Nate</span>]]''' <span style="color:dark blue">•</span> <small>''([[User_talk:Mrschimpf|<span style="color:dodgerblue">chatter</span>]])''</small></font> 20:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
21492 +++$+++ Mrschimpf +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21491 +++$+++ 21491 +++$+++ 2008-10-26 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.225077000E09 +++$+++ I readded the cite, it looks like it was removed in a subsequent edit. <font face=\"Myriad Web\">''' +++$+++ :I readded the cite, it looks like it was removed in a subsequent edit. <font face="Myriad Web">'''[[User:Mrschimpf|<span style="color:maroon">Nate</span>]]''' <span style="color:dark blue">•</span> <small>''([[User_talk:Mrschimpf|<span style="color:dodgerblue">chatter</span>]])''</small></font> 20:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

21493 +++$+++ John Biancato +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21493 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-19 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.227161100E09 +++$+++ See [[WP:OWN]]. \u2014  +++$+++ See [[WP:OWN]]. — [[User:John Biancato|'''<font color="DodgerBlue">Jhn</font>''']][[User talk:John Biancato|'''<font color="DodgerBlue">*</font>''']] 22:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
21494 +++$+++ Ward3001 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21493 +++$+++ 21493 +++$+++ 2008-11-20 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.227168900E09 +++$+++ Adam, you seem to have a serious problem with your temper, and it gets the best of you at times. You're not doing either Wikipedia or yourself any good when that happens. Let me suggest that you take an extended wikibreak, especially from Desperate Housewives, before one is forced on you by an extended block for incivility.  +++$+++ :Adam, you seem to have a serious problem with your temper, and it gets the best of you at times. You're not doing either Wikipedia or yourself any good when that happens. Let me suggest that you take an extended wikibreak, especially from Desperate Housewives, before one is forced on you by an extended block for incivility. [[User:Ward3001|Ward3001]] ([[User talk:Ward3001|talk]]) 00:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

283638 +++$+++ King Lopez +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-15 11:04:00 +++$+++ 1.168887840E09 +++$+++ I have problems with adding the right image tags. Maybe you could help me on that. I would like to add useful pictures on Wikipedia but it is hard to find one that is not a copyright image. Thanks. +++$+++ I have problems with adding the right image tags. Maybe you could help me on that. I would like to add useful pictures on Wikipedia but it is hard to find one that is not a copyright image. Thanks.[[User:King Lopez|King Lopez]] 11:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
283639 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283638 +++$+++ 283638 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.168897920E09 +++$+++ Hello. Wikipedia currently has a policy that non-free media cannot be used on Wikipedia if an equivalent free image is available or could be reasonably created &ndash; see [[Wikipedia:Fair use#Policy]]. This means that copyright photos of living celebrities are almost never permissible, because as public figures a free image could reasonably created (for example, by an editor taking a photo of the person and uploading it to Wikipedia with a {{[[Template:GFDL-self|GFDL-self]]}} license). The best way to add useful images of celebrities is to upload photos that you took yourself, images that are in the public domain, or images released for use with a free license. -- +++$+++ :Hello. Wikipedia currently has a policy that non-free media cannot be used on Wikipedia if an equivalent free image is available or could be reasonably created &ndash; see [[Wikipedia:Fair use#Policy]]. This means that copyright photos of living celebrities are almost never permissible, because as public figures a free image could reasonably created (for example, by an editor taking a photo of the person and uploading it to Wikipedia with a {{[[Template:GFDL-self|GFDL-self]]}} license). The best way to add useful images of celebrities is to upload photos that you took yourself, images that are in the public domain, or images released for use with a free license. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 13:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
283640 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283638 +++$+++ 283638 +++$+++ 2007-01-18 04:09:00 +++$+++ 1.169122140E09 +++$+++ Hello, the site in question doesn't provide encyclopedic content on collaborative fiction or creative writing, it only provides a venue for people to post it. Also, this is a commercial site &ndash; one of the site's aims is to make money off the users' submissions. For these reasons, it may fall short of Wikipedia's [[WP:NOT#MIRROR|WP:NOT]] and [[WP:EL]] guidelines. You haven't done anything wrong by adding the link unless you're involved with the site in an official capacity (for example, you own, maintain, or represent the site); however, I ask that if you want to add a link to this site, you suggest it for inclusion on the article's talk page, explaining why it's in line with Wikipedia's external links policy. -- +++$+++ :Hello, the site in question doesn't provide encyclopedic content on collaborative fiction or creative writing, it only provides a venue for people to post it. Also, this is a commercial site &ndash; one of the site's aims is to make money off the users' submissions. For these reasons, it may fall short of Wikipedia's [[WP:NOT#MIRROR|WP:NOT]] and [[WP:EL]] guidelines. You haven't done anything wrong by adding the link unless you're involved with the site in an official capacity (for example, you own, maintain, or represent the site); however, I ask that if you want to add a link to this site, you suggest it for inclusion on the article's talk page, explaining why it's in line with Wikipedia's external links policy. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 04:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
283641 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283638 +++$+++ 283638 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.169344320E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the heads-up. One image is already tagged; I'll tag the other one too. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the heads-up. One image is already tagged; I'll tag the other one too. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 17:52, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
283642 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283638 +++$+++ 283638 +++$+++ 2007-01-21 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.169439540E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 20:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
283643 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283638 +++$+++ 283642 +++$+++ 2007-01-22 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.169479980E09 +++$+++ Sure, ok. No problem :) -- +++$+++ ::Sure, ok. No problem :) --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 07:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

21497 +++$+++ Yankeesrj12 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21497 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-02 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.228280760E09 +++$+++ Since it seems to be you and I that edit the page a lot, I wanted to get your opinion on something.  Do you think we should make a new schedule for the spring because some of the shows on the fall\/winter schedule don't air until April.  Plus by creating a new schedule it will not stretch each days schedule on a whole page.  Let me know what you think. -- +++$+++ Since it seems to be you and I that edit the page a lot, I wanted to get your opinion on something.  Do you think we should make a new schedule for the spring because some of the shows on the fall/winter schedule don't air until April.  Plus by creating a new schedule it will not stretch each days schedule on a whole page.  Let me know what you think. --[[User:Yankeesrj12|Yankeesrj12]] ([[User talk:Yankeesrj12|talk]]) 21:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
21498 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21497 +++$+++ 21497 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.228282980E09 +++$+++ Yes. Yes, I think we should make a new schedule for the spring. That's a very good idea. Thanks for the suggestion.  +++$+++ :Yes. Yes, I think we should make a new schedule for the spring. That's a very good idea. Thanks for the suggestion. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 21:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
21499 +++$+++ Yankeesrj12 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21497 +++$+++ 21498 +++$+++ 2008-12-03 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.228294500E09 +++$+++ Okay, great! :) -- +++$+++ ::Okay, great! :) --[[User:Yankeesrj12|Yankeesrj12]] ([[User talk:Yankeesrj12|talk]]) 00:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

283645 +++$+++ Cometstyles +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.169589900E09 +++$+++ because I dont think there is anysites like that for '''Rugby''' so I wonder how do you get pics of rugby players & coaches without it being deleted  +++$+++ because I dont think there is anysites like that for '''Rugby''' so I wonder how do you get pics of rugby players & coaches without it being deleted [[User:Cometstyles|Cometstyles]] 14:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
283646 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283645 +++$+++ 283645 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.169599200E09 +++$+++ I don't know of any sites specifically for rugby. However, [[Flickr]] has a large archive of images that are usable on Wikipedia, and you may find some useful rugby pictures there. For images on Flickr that Wikipedia can use, see [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/creativecommons\/by-sa-2.0\/ CC-by-2.0] and [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/creativecommons\/by-sa-2.0\/ CC-by-sa-2.0], and tag any images you upload from Flickr with {{tl|cc-by-2.0}} and {{tl|cc-by-sa-2.0}} respectively. -- +++$+++ :I don't know of any sites specifically for rugby. However, [[Flickr]] has a large archive of images that are usable on Wikipedia, and you may find some useful rugby pictures there. For images on Flickr that Wikipedia can use, see [http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/by-sa-2.0/ CC-by-2.0] and [http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/by-sa-2.0/ CC-by-sa-2.0], and tag any images you upload from Flickr with {{tl|cc-by-2.0}} and {{tl|cc-by-sa-2.0}} respectively. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 16:40, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

21502 +++$+++ Gtabigfan2010 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21502 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-23 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.287892980E09 +++$+++ Hi, I want to ask you. After Eva Longoria married to Tony Parker and she has a new surname and her full name is Eva Longoria Parker. So how about she change a new surname? 'Eva Longoria Parker' to 'Eva Longoria Andromeda' if she married to another one who has a surname is Andromeda. -- +++$+++ Hi, I want to ask you. After Eva Longoria married to Tony Parker and she has a new surname and her full name is Eva Longoria Parker. So how about she change a new surname? 'Eva Longoria Parker' to 'Eva Longoria Andromeda' if she married to another one who has a surname is Andromeda. --[[User:Gtabigfan2010|Gtabigfan2010]] ([[User talk:Gtabigfan2010|talk]]) 21:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
21503 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21502 +++$+++ 21502 +++$+++ 2010-10-23 21:04:00 +++$+++ 1.287893040E09 +++$+++ I don't think so. Thanks, anyway.  +++$+++ : I don't think so. Thanks, anyway. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 21:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

283647 +++$+++ 01001 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-26 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.169871900E09 +++$+++ against the rules of Wikipedia.  I think you should be blocked. +++$+++ against the rules of Wikipedia.  I think you should be blocked.[[User:01001|01001]] 20:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
283648 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283647 +++$+++ 283647 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.169874840E09 +++$+++ Firstly, I am not \"blocking any attempt at balance\", I am removing a section that by my estimation, and the estimation of other editors who have voiced objections, is a violation of Wikipedia's [[WP:OR|original research policy]]. To answer your question, I do not have the authority to block other editors. Like every user, I have the authority to notify you about policy violations, and bring your conduct to the attention of a sysop with blocking privileges if the policy violations persist. -- +++$+++ :Firstly, I am not "blocking any attempt at balance", I am removing a section that by my estimation, and the estimation of other editors who have voiced objections, is a violation of Wikipedia's [[WP:OR|original research policy]]. To answer your question, I do not have the authority to block other editors. Like every user, I have the authority to notify you about policy violations, and bring your conduct to the attention of a sysop with blocking privileges if the policy violations persist. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 21:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
283649 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283647 +++$+++ 283647 +++$+++ 2007-01-26 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.169876340E09 +++$+++ By the way, if you want to draw attention to any perceived problems with an article's neutrality, you can add a {{tl|POV}} tag to the article and explain the specific problems with the article on its talk page. -- +++$+++ :By the way, if you want to draw attention to any perceived problems with an article's neutrality, you can add a {{tl|POV}} tag to the article and explain the specific problems with the article on its talk page. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 21:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
283650 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283647 +++$+++ 283647 +++$+++ 2007-02-08 17:19:00 +++$+++ 1.170983940E09 +++$+++ Hello, technically this isn't an uncontroversial move proposal, since there's a possibility that someone might oppose the move. I've taken the liberty of shifting your proposal to the [[WP:RM#Other proposals|Other proposals]] section and I've added a section for discussion on the article's [[Talk:Fergie (singer)#Requested move|talk page]]. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hello, technically this isn't an uncontroversial move proposal, since there's a possibility that someone might oppose the move. I've taken the liberty of shifting your proposal to the [[WP:RM#Other proposals|Other proposals]] section and I've added a section for discussion on the article's [[Talk:Fergie (singer)#Requested move|talk page]]. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 17:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

558798 +++$+++ CINEGroup +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558798 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-28 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.177821240E09 +++$+++ and you never were interested in the first place. what separates a real admin from a joke admin is what they do with their responsibilites. I've shown you all the evidence, now which kind of admin are you.  +++$+++ and you never were interested in the first place. what separates a real admin from a joke admin is what they do with their responsibilites. I've shown you all the evidence, now which kind of admin are you. [[User:CINEGroup|CINEGroup]] 21:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
558799 +++$+++  +++$+++ Coelacan +++$+++ 558798 +++$+++ 558798 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.177821600E09 +++$+++ I do not have any obligations toward you or anyone here. I am a volunteer, and this is my hobby. My only responsibility as an admin is to not actively abuse the \"protect\", \"delete\", and \"block\" buttons. The extent to which I involve myself in any particular discussion or dispute is entirely my prerogative, and my interest in your problems has dropped to zero. Good bye. \xb7\xb7[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=\" font-variant: small-caps\" >l<\/span>]][[ user talk:coelacan |acan]] 21:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC) +++$+++ :I do not have any obligations toward you or anyone here. I am a volunteer, and this is my hobby. My only responsibility as an admin is to not actively abuse the "protect", "delete", and "block" buttons. The extent to which I involve myself in any particular discussion or dispute is entirely my prerogative, and my interest in your problems has dropped to zero. Good bye. ··[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=" font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>]][[ user talk:coelacan |acan]] 21:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

21507 +++$+++ Emarsee +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21507 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-04 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.233740040E09 +++$+++ I've seen you've been reverting on [[WCPX]] without a valid reason. I see that you have been on Wikipedia for a long time and I assume you know about the FUR. In the situation as it is now, the logo is not acceptable for use on the article as it lacks a FUR for that page. You may add it back when it has a FUR. Thanks and have a nice day. ''' +++$+++ I've seen you've been reverting on [[WCPX]] without a valid reason. I see that you have been on Wikipedia for a long time and I assume you know about the FUR. In the situation as it is now, the logo is not acceptable for use on the article as it lacks a FUR for that page. You may add it back when it has a FUR. Thanks and have a nice day. '''[[User:Emarsee|<span style="font-family:corbel; font-size:11pt; color:#CC6600">єmarsee</span>]] <sup>([[User_talk:Emarsee|<span style="font-family:corbel; font-size:8pt">Discuss</span>]])</sup>''' 01:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
21508 +++$+++ Terrillja +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21507 +++$+++ 21507 +++$+++ 2009-02-04 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.233740940E09 +++$+++ Fixed, took all of 2 minutes. The bot just can't read non-templated fair use rationales, and the article was not listed. Emarsee could have done the same thing in the time it took to revert.-- +++$+++ :Fixed, took all of 2 minutes. The bot just can't read non-templated fair use rationales, and the article was not listed. Emarsee could have done the same thing in the time it took to revert.--[[User:Terrillja|<font color="003300">Terrillja</font>]][[User Talk:Terrillja|<font color="black"><sub> talk</sub></font>]] 01:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

283655 +++$+++ Brian Hamilton  +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283655 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-16 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.171694220E09 +++$+++ My apologies. I realize that the referenced link -- actually sources\/references the wikipedia article! The contribution was made by a one time anonymous user--and I cannot locate anything to back it up. Will revert back to yours. Good catch, after all. Sorry. End of saga :)--<span style=\"color:green\"> +++$+++ My apologies. I realize that the referenced link -- actually sources/references the wikipedia article! The contribution was made by a one time anonymous user--and I cannot locate anything to back it up. Will revert back to yours. Good catch, after all. Sorry. End of saga :)--<span style="color:green">[[User:Brian Hamilton|MrEguy]]  |  [[User talk:Brian Hamilton |&spades;&hearts;&clubs;&diams;]]</span> 22:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
283656 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283655 +++$+++ 283655 +++$+++ 2007-02-17 03:25:00 +++$+++ 1.171711500E09 +++$+++ Hello, no problem. The info was added by a serial vandal who adds the nonsense phrase \"hen fap\" to random articles. -- +++$+++ :Hello, no problem. The info was added by a serial vandal who adds the nonsense phrase "hen fap" to random articles. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 03:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

545800 +++$+++ Jmh649 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545800 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-27 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.238151000E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 03:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
545801 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545800 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-27 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.238218260E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help with [[Lutz-Jeanselme syndrome\u200e]].  Sorry I was having trouble finding a reference.  +++$+++ :*Thanks for your help with [[Lutz-Jeanselme syndrome‎]].  Sorry I was having trouble finding a reference. [[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 22:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

283657 +++$+++ RandomJoe123 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-19 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.171912680E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:RandomJoe123|RandomJoe123]] 11:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
283658 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283657 +++$+++ 283657 +++$+++ 2007-02-19 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.171887960E09 +++$+++ Stating a source in an edit summary is insufficient to meet Wikipedia's attribution policies. You have to include a link to the source in the article. Please see the policies linked on your talk page for further info on how to correctly source material. Please also see [[WP:OWN]]: this is not your article; others are free to edit it in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. -- +++$+++ :Stating a source in an edit summary is insufficient to meet Wikipedia's attribution policies. You have to include a link to the source in the article. Please see the policies linked on your talk page for further info on how to correctly source material. Please also see [[WP:OWN]]: this is not your article; others are free to edit it in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 04:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
283659 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283657 +++$+++ 283657 +++$+++ 2007-02-19 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.171915860E09 +++$+++ Yes, it's clear as mud :)  I'll hunt around the local libraries and see if I can find some authoritative references on these terms. -- +++$+++ :Yes, it's clear as mud :)  I'll hunt around the local libraries and see if I can find some authoritative references on these terms. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 12:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

593714 +++$+++ 7876 ann arbor street +++$+++ ParisianBlade +++$+++ 593714 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-10 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.226311080E09 +++$+++ I think you're confused.  Proof is not needed.  A reliable source said \"by their own admission\".  Please go to the talk page and discuss.   +++$+++ I think you're confused.  Proof is not needed.  A reliable source said "by their own admission".  Please go to the talk page and discuss.  [[User:7876 ann arbor street|7876 ann arbor street]] ([[User talk:7876 ann arbor street|talk]]) 01:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
593715 +++$+++ 7876 ann arbor street +++$+++ ParisianBlade +++$+++ 593714 +++$+++ 593714 +++$+++ 2008-11-10 03:54:00 +++$+++ 1.226318040E09 +++$+++ It's a wiki.  See [http:\/\/www.conservapedia.com\/index.php?title=Irish_Dance&action=history Irish Dance history].  Please don't edit my user page.  +++$+++ :It's a wiki.  See [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Irish_Dance&action=history Irish Dance history].  Please don't edit my user page. [[User:7876 ann arbor street|7876 ann arbor street]] ([[User talk:7876 ann arbor street|talk]]) 03:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
593716 +++$+++ 7876 ann arbor street +++$+++ ParisianBlade +++$+++ 593714 +++$+++ 593715 +++$+++ 2008-11-10 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.226319000E09 +++$+++ Also, FYI, my interpretation of \"us\" in the [http:\/\/articles.latimes.com\/2007\/jun\/19\/nation\/na-schlafly19 \"But the biggest lesson she\u2019s taken away as a young conservative is:  'There are people who want to destroy us'\"] quote was conservatives, not conservapedia.  I think it is an insightful quote about the aspirations of some on the left to destroy the right.   +++$+++ ::Also, FYI, my interpretation of "us" in the [http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jun/19/nation/na-schlafly19 "But the biggest lesson she’s taken away as a young conservative is:  'There are people who want to destroy us'"] quote was conservatives, not conservapedia.  I think it is an insightful quote about the aspirations of some on the left to destroy the right.  [[User:7876 ann arbor street|7876 ann arbor street]] ([[User talk:7876 ann arbor street|talk]]) 04:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
593717 +++$+++ 7876 ann arbor street +++$+++ ParisianBlade +++$+++ 593714 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-10 04:24:00 +++$+++ 1.226319840E09 +++$+++ Okay.  It treated it unthinkingly like a username, but you're right, it could have been a personal name.   +++$+++ ::::Okay.  It treated it unthinkingly like a username, but you're right, it could have been a personal name.  [[User:7876 ann arbor street|7876 ann arbor street]] ([[User talk:7876 ann arbor street|talk]]) 04:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

527874 +++$+++ CyberGhostface +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527874 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-27 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.182997080E09 +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Image:Lemonysnicketgrave.PNG}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Image:Lemonysnicketgrave.PNG]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.  +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Image:Lemonysnicketgrave.PNG}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Image:Lemonysnicketgrave.PNG]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:CyberGhostface|CyberGhostface]] 19:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
527875 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527874 +++$+++ 527874 +++$+++ 2007-06-27 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.183006020E09 +++$+++ You could just have asked someone at [[WP:AN]], you don't need deletion review for simple mistakes.  +++$+++ :You could just have asked someone at [[WP:AN]], you don't need deletion review for simple mistakes. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 21:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

283662 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283662 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-21 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.172119200E09 +++$+++ Hi, I assume the editor wanted to use the image under fair use, and had no idea what to tag it with. If he would have stated on the image page that it was released under the GFDL or creative commons, or that he took the picture, then it would be a copyvio. Now the image will be deleted anyway because of no information on its copyright status and even if it will have that info, it probably will fail our [[Wikipedia:fair use criteria|fair use criteria]]. But it's not really a deliberate copyright violation.  +++$+++ Hi, I assume the editor wanted to use the image under fair use, and had no idea what to tag it with. If he would have stated on the image page that it was released under the GFDL or creative commons, or that he took the picture, then it would be a copyvio. Now the image will be deleted anyway because of no information on its copyright status and even if it will have that info, it probably will fail our [[Wikipedia:fair use criteria|fair use criteria]]. But it's not really a deliberate copyright violation. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 20:40, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
283663 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283662 +++$+++ 283662 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.172120340E09 +++$+++ Hello, thank you the reply. I spend a fair amount of time tagging images, so it's important to me to get the policies clear. What I'm confused about is that the image appears to meet all the relevant parameters of CSD G12. G12 doesn't state that there must be deliberate intention to violate on the part of the uploader, it only states that the copyright violation must be blatant, i.e, able to be established beyond reasonable doubt. If the assertion is questionable, it meets G12, but if the assertion does not exist, as is the case here, it also meets G12. As you say, the image is going to be deleted anyway, so this discussion is moot. But I want to get things cleared up for future cases. And I appreciate the reply. -- +++$+++ :Hello, thank you the reply. I spend a fair amount of time tagging images, so it's important to me to get the policies clear. What I'm confused about is that the image appears to meet all the relevant parameters of CSD G12. G12 doesn't state that there must be deliberate intention to violate on the part of the uploader, it only states that the copyright violation must be blatant, i.e, able to be established beyond reasonable doubt. If the assertion is questionable, it meets G12, but if the assertion does not exist, as is the case here, it also meets G12. As you say, the image is going to be deleted anyway, so this discussion is moot. But I want to get things cleared up for future cases. And I appreciate the reply. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 20:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
283664 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283662 +++$+++ 283662 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.172119560E09 +++$+++ You also really could have waited before reverting me. Also see [[:Category:Images with no copyright tag]] with exactly the same kind of images and [[WP:CSD#I4]]. They (almost) all will be deleted. No reason to add it to the normal overflow on csd.  +++$+++ :You also really could have waited before reverting me. Also see [[:Category:Images with no copyright tag]] with exactly the same kind of images and [[WP:CSD#I4]]. They (almost) all will be deleted. No reason to add it to the normal overflow on csd. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 20:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
283665 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283662 +++$+++ 283664 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.172120340E09 +++$+++ Sorry for that, I was in fact about to revert myself immediately after I finished writing the above message. I wanted to clarify the usage of CSD G12 because unlike CSD I4 there is no 7 day wait period (I felt that if a copyright is blatant it's preferable to use a tag that allows it to be removed from Wikipedia as soon as possible).-- +++$+++ ::Sorry for that, I was in fact about to revert myself immediately after I finished writing the above message. I wanted to clarify the usage of CSD G12 because unlike CSD I4 there is no 7 day wait period (I felt that if a copyright is blatant it's preferable to use a tag that allows it to be removed from Wikipedia as soon as possible).--[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 20:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
283666 +++$+++ Garion96 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283662 +++$+++ 283665 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.172121660E09 +++$+++ That's ok. I guess, don't know for sure (you could look at the CSD talk archives) the reason is that it might fall under fair use and give the editor some time to fix it, I also think that criterium was made before our stricter enforcing of the fair use criteria before the stricter copyright violation criteria. It is a bit inconsistent yes, but since the image will be deleted anyway, I don't think it matters that much.  +++$+++ ::: That's ok. I guess, don't know for sure (you could look at the CSD talk archives) the reason is that it might fall under fair use and give the editor some time to fix it, I also think that criterium was made before our stricter enforcing of the fair use criteria before the stricter copyright violation criteria. It is a bit inconsistent yes, but since the image will be deleted anyway, I don't think it matters that much. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 21:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
283667 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283662 +++$+++ 283666 +++$+++ 2007-02-21 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.172121900E09 +++$+++ Ok, that clears things up. And thanks again for your patience :) -- +++$+++ ::::Ok, that clears things up. And thanks again for your patience :) --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 21:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

21521 +++$+++ 86.207.189.197 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-17 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.240004100E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/86.207.189.197|86.207.189.197]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/86.207.189.197|86.207.189.197]] ([[User talk:86.207.189.197|talk]]) 14:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
21522 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21521 +++$+++ 21521 +++$+++ 2009-04-17 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.240009200E09 +++$+++ Because ''[[Desperate Housewives]]'' hasn't been renewed for another season as of yet.  +++$+++ :Because ''[[Desperate Housewives]]'' hasn't been renewed for another season as of yet. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 16:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

541917 +++$+++ Brixton Busters +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541917 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-30 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.188516300E09 +++$+++ Can you let me know what I need to do about this please? Do I need to add information to any particular page? Thank you.  +++$+++ Can you let me know what I need to do about this please? Do I need to add information to any particular page? Thank you. [[User:Brixton Busters|Brixton Busters]] 16:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
541918 +++$+++ Brixton Busters +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541917 +++$+++ 541917 +++$+++ 2007-08-30 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.188517140E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I am slightly busy at work for the next 24 hours, but I will try to have my comments done within 48 hours.  +++$+++ :Thank you. I am slightly busy at work for the next 24 hours, but I will try to have my comments done within 48 hours. [[User:Brixton Busters|Brixton Busters]] 16:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
541919 +++$+++ Brixton Busters +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541917 +++$+++ 541918 +++$+++ 2007-09-01 09:42:00 +++$+++ 1.188664920E09 +++$+++ I have given my initial thoughts. Sorry for the delay, thank you.  +++$+++ ::I have given my initial thoughts. Sorry for the delay, thank you. [[User:Brixton Busters|Brixton Busters]] 09:42, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

283668 +++$+++ Jambaloop +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283668 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-23 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.172281560E09 +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|The Institute of Brand Science}}}|deletion review]] of [[:The Institute of Brand Science]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.  +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|The Institute of Brand Science}}}|deletion review]] of [[:The Institute of Brand Science]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:Jambaloop|Jambaloop]] 17:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
283669 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283668 +++$+++ 283668 +++$+++ 2007-02-23 17:54:00 +++$+++ 1.172282040E09 +++$+++ Hello, it was [[User:Steel359|Steel359]], not me, who closed the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/The Institute of Brand Science|AFD discussion]] and later speedy deleted the recreated article[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log\/delete&page=The_Institute_of_Brand_Science].  -- +++$+++ :Hello, it was [[User:Steel359|Steel359]], not me, who closed the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Institute of Brand Science|AFD discussion]] and later speedy deleted the recreated article[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=The_Institute_of_Brand_Science].  --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 17:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

283670 +++$+++ HongQiGong +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-22 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.174599000E09 +++$+++ The [[Chink]] article has been greatly expanded now.  Please take a look and see if you are interested in reconsidering your vote for merge.   +++$+++ The [[Chink]] article has been greatly expanded now.  Please take a look and see if you are interested in reconsidering your vote for merge.  [[User:HongQiGong|Hong Qi Gong]] <small>([[User talk:HongQiGong|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/HongQiGong|Contribs]])</small> 14:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
283671 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283670 +++$+++ 283670 +++$+++ 2007-03-22 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.174606980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the notice. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the notice. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 16:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
283672 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283670 +++$+++ 283670 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.174967340E09 +++$+++ No problem, thanks. -- +++$+++ :No problem, thanks. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 20:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

545815 +++$+++ GBataille +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545815 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-14 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.239694860E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your interest in the Flava Works article. However, before judging what is at issue here, please compare the two different versions of the article: the version to which I am trying to revert and the one that keeps being advocated by a series of IP editors as well as Wikipedia editors whose list of contributions contains nothing but the Flava Works piece. (In other words, there is very strong evidence of a conflict of interest here.) \"My\" version of the article tries to be neutral in its judgments; it is also carefully researched and well-documented. I created the entry in the first place. The other version that keeps being pushed by\u2014I assume\u2014representatives of the company is biased (it quotes at length the CEO from the company's own website, lists awards that the company was nominated for but never received, etc.). My suggestion would be to block edits to the article for a while. However, my own involvement with the article will stop at this point. +++$+++ Thank you for your interest in the Flava Works article. However, before judging what is at issue here, please compare the two different versions of the article: the version to which I am trying to revert and the one that keeps being advocated by a series of IP editors as well as Wikipedia editors whose list of contributions contains nothing but the Flava Works piece. (In other words, there is very strong evidence of a conflict of interest here.) "My" version of the article tries to be neutral in its judgments; it is also carefully researched and well-documented. I created the entry in the first place. The other version that keeps being pushed by—I assume—representatives of the company is biased (it quotes at length the CEO from the company's own website, lists awards that the company was nominated for but never received, etc.). My suggestion would be to block edits to the article for a while. However, my own involvement with the article will stop at this point.[[User:GBataille|GBataille]] ([[User talk:GBataille|talk]]) 00:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
545816 +++$+++ Yobmod +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545815 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-04-20 14:48:00 +++$+++ 1.240264080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for any input. +++$+++ ::Thanks for any input.[[User:Yobmod|<b><font color="#0000CD">Yob</font></b>]][[User talk:Yobmod|<b><font color="008000">Mod</font></b>]] 14:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

283673 +++$+++ Ventifax +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-30 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.175321100E09 +++$+++ I really had no idea that [[Nadia Turner]] had previously been deleted, & it still seems incredibly arbitrary to delete that one contestant page. That's why I flipped out. Now, I'm thinking pretty seriously about the larger issues here. It does seem odd the degree to which people use this as a general fansite for whatever is current.  +++$+++ I really had no idea that [[Nadia Turner]] had previously been deleted, & it still seems incredibly arbitrary to delete that one contestant page. That's why I flipped out. Now, I'm thinking pretty seriously about the larger issues here. It does seem odd the degree to which people use this as a general fansite for whatever is current. [[User:Ventifax|Ventifax]] 23:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
283674 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283673 +++$+++ 283673 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.175411100E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about it, it's not a problem :) Articles are usually nominated for deletion in accordance with the judgment of individual editors rather than by a systematic process; if a particular editor feels an article doesn't meet WP's inclusion standards he or she will list it at AFD. That's why it can seem (and, in fact, often is) arbitrary. -- +++$+++ :Don't worry about it, it's not a problem :) Articles are usually nominated for deletion in accordance with the judgment of individual editors rather than by a systematic process; if a particular editor feels an article doesn't meet WP's inclusion standards he or she will list it at AFD. That's why it can seem (and, in fact, often is) arbitrary. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 00:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

21531 +++$+++ Onopearls +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-01 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.241226540E09 +++$+++ If you can't provide [[WP:Reliable Source|reliable sources]] for having Edie's age as 50, birth year as 1964, and death year as 2014, leave them out. Wikipedia isn't the place for [[WP:OR|Original Research]]. Thanks,  +++$+++ If you can't provide [[WP:Reliable Source|reliable sources]] for having Edie's age as 50, birth year as 1964, and death year as 2014, leave them out. Wikipedia isn't the place for [[WP:OR|Original Research]]. Thanks, [[User:Onopearls|Ono]] ([[User talk:Onopearls|talk]]) 18:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
21532 +++$+++ Michu1945 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21531 +++$+++ 21531 +++$+++ 2009-05-29 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.243659060E09 +++$+++ Edie Britt said in episode \"dress big\" (episode 17 season 3) that she have a 40 years old. It was 2007 year. So she borned in 1967.  +++$+++ :Edie Britt said in episode "dress big" (episode 17 season 3) that she have a 40 years old. It was 2007 year. So she borned in 1967. [[User:Michu1945|Michu1945]] ([[User talk:Michu1945|talk]]) 21:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

545820 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545820 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-21 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.240369860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your assistance! -- +++$+++ Thanks for your assistance! --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 20:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
545821 +++$+++ Moni3 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545820 +++$+++ 545820 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.240381020E09 +++$+++ Here's a question: I don't know how to format the images in [[Outdated theories of anaesthetic action]]. -- +++$+++ :Here's a question: I don't know how to format the images in [[Outdated theories of anaesthetic action]]. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 23:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

21533 +++$+++ Hithere2008 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21533 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-05 15:16:00 +++$+++ 1.241561760E09 +++$+++ Sorry for actualy adding stuff that's true -- +++$+++ Sorry for actualy adding stuff that's true --[[User:Hithere2008|Hithere2008]] ([[User talk:Hithere2008|talk]]) 15:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
21534 +++$+++ Onopearls +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21533 +++$+++ 21533 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 22:52:00 +++$+++ 1.241761920E09 +++$+++ I dont mean to sound rude or anything, but this isnt the first time that I have seen a message that you left on a talk page and thought it was not acceptable by wikipedia policies. Everyone is welcomed to edit wikipedia, even if there edits are or are not correct (see [[wp:assume good faith|assume good faith]]. I suggest that you see [[wp:Etiquette|etiquette]] to learn how wikipedia expects it editors to behave. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Hithere2008#Edie_Britt see here] Thanks,  +++$+++ :I dont mean to sound rude or anything, but this isnt the first time that I have seen a message that you left on a talk page and thought it was not acceptable by wikipedia policies. Everyone is welcomed to edit wikipedia, even if there edits are or are not correct (see [[wp:assume good faith|assume good faith]]. I suggest that you see [[wp:Etiquette|etiquette]] to learn how wikipedia expects it editors to behave. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hithere2008#Edie_Britt see here] Thanks, [[User:Onopearls|Ono]] ([[User talk:Onopearls|talk]]) 22:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

283679 +++$+++ 4frans4 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283679 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-05 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.178374200E09 +++$+++ you told me about sources. So there are videos where [[Eminem]] and [[Xzibit]] perform together and also there is an official music video Don't Approach Me [[Xzibit]] ft [[Eminem]] as sources may I link those youtube videos on talkpage. Please reply me. Be seein ya. Sorry for actlike idiot on that image thing-- +++$+++ you told me about sources. So there are videos where [[Eminem]] and [[Xzibit]] perform together and also there is an official music video Don't Approach Me [[Xzibit]] ft [[Eminem]] as sources may I link those youtube videos on talkpage. Please reply me. Be seein ya. Sorry for actlike idiot on that image thing--[[User:4frans4|Frans Adiesha]] 07:10, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
283680 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283679 +++$+++ 283679 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.178425440E09 +++$+++ Don't worry about the images, it's not a big deal. We can't link to most Youtube videos because they are usually hosted without the permission of the copyright holder. -- +++$+++ :Don't worry about the images, it's not a big deal. We can't link to most Youtube videos because they are usually hosted without the permission of the copyright holder. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 21:24, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

283681 +++$+++ 4frans4 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283681 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-05 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.178374440E09 +++$+++ I forgot to mention in [[Xzibit]]'s article on the ascociated acts there is [[Eminem]]. Please take a look at that. thanks-- +++$+++ I forgot to mention in [[Xzibit]]'s article on the ascociated acts there is [[Eminem]]. Please take a look at that. thanks--[[User:4frans4|Frans Adiesha]] 07:14, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
283682 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283681 +++$+++ 283681 +++$+++ 2007-05-05 21:24:00 +++$+++ 1.178425440E09 +++$+++ Probably the best course of action is to propose the addition on the article's talk page and get input from other editors with expert knowledge. -- +++$+++ :Probably the best course of action is to propose the addition on the article's talk page and get input from other editors with expert knowledge. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 21:24, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

283683 +++$+++ 4frans4 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-06 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.178456640E09 +++$+++ in the article's talk page can i give  youtube links to those vids. help me to sort this out man you gotta help me-- +++$+++ in the article's talk page can i give  youtube links to those vids. help me to sort this out man you gotta help me--[[User:4frans4|Frans Adiesha]] 06:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
283684 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283683 +++$+++ 283683 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.178615460E09 +++$+++ I've started a discussion about this on the article's talk page. Like I said, I'm not an expert on this subject, but maybe other editors can help you resolve this. -- +++$+++ :I've started a discussion about this on the article's talk page. Like I said, I'm not an expert on this subject, but maybe other editors can help you resolve this. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 02:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

21540 +++$+++ Michu1945 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21540 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-27 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.243469700E09 +++$+++ Gabrielle Flashback: Edie told her in the night when she got divorced with Carlos, that he would die before 50. When the camera stopped the flashback, Gabi said, that who had predicted that he would die before 50. Since she had 50 years and we had, in series, 2014, she had to borned in 1964.  +++$+++ Gabrielle Flashback: Edie told her in the night when she got divorced with Carlos, that he would die before 50. When the camera stopped the flashback, Gabi said, that who had predicted that he would die before 50. Since she had 50 years and we had, in series, 2014, she had to borned in 1964. [[User:Michu1945|Michu1945]] ([[User talk:Michu1945|talk]]) 17:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
21541 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21540 +++$+++ 21540 +++$+++ 2009-05-27 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.243490400E09 +++$+++ Look, mister, if you can't provide a reliable source of Edie Britt's birthdate, just leave the [[Edie Britt]] page alone!  +++$+++ :Look, mister, if you can't provide a reliable source of Edie Britt's birthdate, just leave the [[Edie Britt]] page alone! [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 23:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

283686 +++$+++ Teniii +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283686 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Or maybe i thought too highly of myself...i apologise and just wanted to say u won't see mee anymore on wikipedia. If i ever want to be an administrator i will have to make a new account and start off fresh. hehe. Unless of course i somehow make a miraculous comeback and get nominated which will never happen, but if it did, then maybe i would re-think things. hahaha, seeya around man.  +++$+++ Or maybe i thought too highly of myself...i apologise and just wanted to say u won't see mee anymore on wikipedia. If i ever want to be an administrator i will have to make a new account and start off fresh. hehe. Unless of course i somehow make a miraculous comeback and get nominated which will never happen, but if it did, then maybe i would re-think things. hahaha, seeya around man. [[User:Teniii|Teniii]] 9:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
283687 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283686 +++$+++ 283686 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.178615820E09 +++$+++ I raised what I consider to be legitimate concerns about your suitability as an admin, which is my responsibility as an RFA participant. Looking back, I should have worded my comments more diplomatically and respectfully, and will do so in future. The bottom line is that I feel that some of your past edits have not been in keeping with the standards of conduct expected of an admin, and your edits have not convinced me that you are ready for adminship at this time. No offense, but I'd prefer to keep discussion on this talk page focussed on issues relating to article content and policy\/guideline issues (you can email me if you want to discuss other things off-wiki). Please don't let my comments discourage you from contributing in good faith to improving the encyclopedia. -- +++$+++ :I raised what I consider to be legitimate concerns about your suitability as an admin, which is my responsibility as an RFA participant. Looking back, I should have worded my comments more diplomatically and respectfully, and will do so in future. The bottom line is that I feel that some of your past edits have not been in keeping with the standards of conduct expected of an admin, and your edits have not convinced me that you are ready for adminship at this time. No offense, but I'd prefer to keep discussion on this talk page focussed on issues relating to article content and policy/guideline issues (you can email me if you want to discuss other things off-wiki). Please don't let my comments discourage you from contributing in good faith to improving the encyclopedia. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 02:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
283688 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283686 +++$+++ 283686 +++$+++ 2007-05-10 15:33:00 +++$+++ 1.178836380E09 +++$+++ No problem, thank you. -- +++$+++ :No problem, thank you. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 15:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

21545 +++$+++ Magioladitis +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21545 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-29 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.243664160E09 +++$+++ Some heads up for the [[WP:3RR]]. --  +++$+++ Some heads up for the [[WP:3RR]]. -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 23:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
21546 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21545 +++$+++ 21545 +++$+++ 2009-06-01 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.243907400E09 +++$+++ Look, Mike and Susan were married in the Season 3 episode \"[[Getting Married Today]]\". Their marriage was destroyed in the Season 5 episode \"[[You're Gonna Love Tomorrow]]\". Mike and Susan weren't re-married in the end of Season 5. That's why the identity of the mystery bride has to remain a secret until the season premiere.  +++$+++ :Look, Mike and Susan were married in the Season 3 episode "[[Getting Married Today]]". Their marriage was destroyed in the Season 5 episode "[[You're Gonna Love Tomorrow]]". Mike and Susan weren't re-married in the end of Season 5. That's why the identity of the mystery bride has to remain a secret until the season premiere. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 18:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

21547 +++$+++ Onopearls +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-07 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.244423760E09 +++$+++ You've already been warned not to [[WP:NPA|attack people verbally.]] You [[wp:Ownership of articles|do not own the desperate housewives articles]], so every person on Wikipedia has just as much of a right as you do to edit them. I suggest you take a good look at the wikipedia policies that you violate regularly, such as [[WP:Civility]], [[WP:NPA]], [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:Ownership of articles]]. And I notice that you enjoy telling people that you tell to NEVER edit an article again that they will be banned if they do. You are not an administrator, so you really do not have the power to enforce that threat. Furthermore, your threat is baseless, as someone is not going to be banned for making a good faith edit. Thanks,  +++$+++ You've already been warned not to [[WP:NPA|attack people verbally.]] You [[wp:Ownership of articles|do not own the desperate housewives articles]], so every person on Wikipedia has just as much of a right as you do to edit them. I suggest you take a good look at the wikipedia policies that you violate regularly, such as [[WP:Civility]], [[WP:NPA]], [[WP:AGF]] and [[WP:Ownership of articles]]. And I notice that you enjoy telling people that you tell to NEVER edit an article again that they will be banned if they do. You are not an administrator, so you really do not have the power to enforce that threat. Furthermore, your threat is baseless, as someone is not going to be banned for making a good faith edit. Thanks, [[User:Onopearls|'''<span style="color: silver">Ono</span><span style="color: #92000a">pearls</span>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Onopearls|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Onopearls|c]])</sup> 18:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
21548 +++$+++ Ward3001 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.244427600E09 +++$+++ Let me back up what Onopearls is saying, and add a further statement. Adam, I would like a response from you here stating your understanding of Wikipedia's policies about personal attacks and ownership of articles. If you don't do so and continue this same type of editing, I plan to make a [[WP:ANI]] report. That would be at least the second complaint about your incivility. Think about it, and please give us some details here regarding what you plan to do to change this kind of editing.  +++$+++ :Let me back up what Onopearls is saying, and add a further statement. Adam, I would like a response from you here stating your understanding of Wikipedia's policies about personal attacks and ownership of articles. If you don't do so and continue this same type of editing, I plan to make a [[WP:ANI]] report. That would be at least the second complaint about your incivility. Think about it, and please give us some details here regarding what you plan to do to change this kind of editing. [[User:Ward3001|Ward3001]] ([[User talk:Ward3001|talk]]) 19:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
21549 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ 21548 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.244430180E09 +++$+++ I will never use personal attacks on other people ever again. And you're right. I don't own any of the articles. I also understand Wikipedia's policies about personal attacks and ownership of articles.  +++$+++ ::I will never use personal attacks on other people ever again. And you're right. I don't own any of the articles. I also understand Wikipedia's policies about personal attacks and ownership of articles. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 20:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
21550 +++$+++ Ward3001 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.244430420E09 +++$+++ Would you be willing to not edit or comment on any articles related to Desperate Housewives for a period of two weeks, since those are the articles where your problems tend to occur?  +++$+++ :Would you be willing to not edit or comment on any articles related to Desperate Housewives for a period of two weeks, since those are the articles where your problems tend to occur? [[User:Ward3001|Ward3001]] ([[User talk:Ward3001|talk]]) 20:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
21551 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ 21550 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.244430660E09 +++$+++ Yes, I would be willing to not edit or comment on any articles related to Desperate Housewives for a period of no more than two weeks, since those are the articles where my problems tend to occur.  +++$+++ ::Yes, I would be willing to not edit or comment on any articles related to Desperate Housewives for a period of no more than two weeks, since those are the articles where my problems tend to occur. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 20:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
21552 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.244431560E09 +++$+++ Could you please put a two-week protection tag on articles related to Desperate Housewives so that I'll know I won't edit or comment on those articles since those are the articles where my problems tend to occur? Please let me know as soon as possible. Thank you.  +++$+++ :Could you please put a two-week protection tag on articles related to Desperate Housewives so that I'll know I won't edit or comment on those articles since those are the articles where my problems tend to occur? Please let me know as soon as possible. Thank you. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 20:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
21553 +++$+++ Ward3001 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ 21552 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.244432400E09 +++$+++ I'm not an admin; I'm just trying to help you stay out of trouble. I can't force you to do anything. I really don't think a protection tag is needed. I think you just need a two-week period of not editing those articles so you can let go of some of this sense of ownership that gets you into trouble. But that's completely up to you. If you can avoid personal attacks and ownership without doing that, there won't be a problem. But if you continue with the attacks, I think know what will happen.  +++$+++ ::I'm not an admin; I'm just trying to help you stay out of trouble. I can't force you to do anything. I really don't think a protection tag is needed. I think you just need a two-week period of not editing those articles so you can let go of some of this sense of ownership that gets you into trouble. But that's completely up to you. If you can avoid personal attacks and ownership without doing that, there won't be a problem. But if you continue with the attacks, I think know what will happen. [[User:Ward3001|Ward3001]] ([[User talk:Ward3001|talk]]) 20:40, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
21554 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.244432640E09 +++$+++ Couldn't I just keep editing any of the Desperate Housewives articles, this time without using personal attacks and ownership on anyone? Like you said, it's completely up to me. Right?  +++$+++ :Couldn't I just keep editing any of the Desperate Housewives articles, this time without using personal attacks and ownership on anyone? Like you said, it's completely up to me. Right? [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 20:44, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
21555 +++$+++ Ward3001 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21547 +++$+++ 21554 +++$+++ 2009-06-07 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.244433120E09 +++$+++ That's your choice, just as it has always been your choice to edit without personal attacks and assuming ownership. My biggest concern is that you don't have a good track record on those articles, and a number of editors are now watching your behavior, myself included. Any admin who reviews your edit history and comments on your talk page probably won't have much sympathy. I personally would take a wikibreak from articles that seem to get me into trouble.  But the choice is yours.  +++$+++ ::That's your choice, just as it has always been your choice to edit without personal attacks and assuming ownership. My biggest concern is that you don't have a good track record on those articles, and a number of editors are now watching your behavior, myself included. Any admin who reviews your edit history and comments on your talk page probably won't have much sympathy. I personally would take a wikibreak from articles that seem to get me into trouble.  But the choice is yours. [[User:Ward3001|Ward3001]] ([[User talk:Ward3001|talk]]) 20:52, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

283695 +++$+++ AQu01rius +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-17 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.179402120E09 +++$+++ I was experimenting with the template back in the day, and entered a totally random name (and accidentally created the page). I forgot to tag it for speedy deletion, thanks for pointing that out.  +++$+++ I was experimenting with the template back in the day, and entered a totally random name (and accidentally created the page). I forgot to tag it for speedy deletion, thanks for pointing that out. [[User:AQu01rius|Aquarius]]&nbsp;&#149;&nbsp;[[User_talk:AQu01rius|talk]] 04:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
283696 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283695 +++$+++ 283695 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 04:42:00 +++$+++ 1.179402120E09 +++$+++ No problem, thanks. -- +++$+++ :No problem, thanks. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 04:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
283697 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283695 +++$+++ 283695 +++$+++ 2007-05-19 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.179579120E09 +++$+++ Hello. [[Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming|External link spamming]] on Wikipedia is defined as, \"Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product\". Links to your website were removed because a) Wikipedia's [[WP:EL|external links guidelines]] recommend that editors avoid linking to sites they own or maintain, and b) Wikipedia prohibits linking to sites that exist primarily to sell a product or service. See [[WP:EL#Advertising and conflicts of interest|Advertising and conflicts of interest]] for more info. -- +++$+++ :Hello. [[Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming|External link spamming]] on Wikipedia is defined as, "Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product". Links to your website were removed because a) Wikipedia's [[WP:EL|external links guidelines]] recommend that editors avoid linking to sites they own or maintain, and b) Wikipedia prohibits linking to sites that exist primarily to sell a product or service. See [[WP:EL#Advertising and conflicts of interest|Advertising and conflicts of interest]] for more info. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 05:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
283698 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283695 +++$+++ 283695 +++$+++ 2007-05-20 06:43:00 +++$+++ 1.179668580E09 +++$+++ After reviewing the links and text you added to [[Talk:Nigger\/Archive 3#Meaning of the word \"nigger\" and how to best make an entry in Wikipedia|the talk page]], it's not clear to me what encyclopedic additions you are trying to make. The link you provided above fails Wikipedia's guidelines for [[WP:RS|reliable source]]s, so it can't be used as the basis for legitimate additions to Wikipedia articles. I can only recommend that you rework your proposed addition into succinct, sourced encyclopedic prose, and work with other interested parties on the article's talk page. Please see the [[WP:BETTER|guide to writing better articles]] for more info on writing effective material for Wikipedia articles. -- +++$+++ :After reviewing the links and text you added to [[Talk:Nigger/Archive 3#Meaning of the word "nigger" and how to best make an entry in Wikipedia|the talk page]], it's not clear to me what encyclopedic additions you are trying to make. The link you provided above fails Wikipedia's guidelines for [[WP:RS|reliable source]]s, so it can't be used as the basis for legitimate additions to Wikipedia articles. I can only recommend that you rework your proposed addition into succinct, sourced encyclopedic prose, and work with other interested parties on the article's talk page. Please see the [[WP:BETTER|guide to writing better articles]] for more info on writing effective material for Wikipedia articles. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 06:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
283699 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283695 +++$+++ 283695 +++$+++ 2007-05-29 18:30:00 +++$+++ 1.180488600E09 +++$+++ Oh! Sorry about that... :) -- +++$+++ :Oh! Sorry about that... :) --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 18:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

283700 +++$+++ jbolden1517 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283700 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-30 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.180518900E09 +++$+++ I have reverted the page twice in 24 hours.  Take a look the last two included the material from early May (that is work continued).  And arbcom has consistently found that tendentious editing is vandalism.  And that is what that is.  You owe him a real explination.  We left the page your way while fateclub came up with his response.   +++$+++ I have reverted the page twice in 24 hours.  Take a look the last two included the material from early May (that is work continued).  And arbcom has consistently found that tendentious editing is vandalism.  And that is what that is.  You owe him a real explination.  We left the page your way while fateclub came up with his response.  [[User:jbolden1517|jbolden1517]]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">[[User talk:jbolden1517|Talk]]</font></sup> 02:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
283701 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283700 +++$+++ 283700 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.180520160E09 +++$+++ Here are your three reverts: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lolita_%28disambiguation%29&diff=134464839&oldid=133579565 01:43, 30 May 2007], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lolita_%28disambiguation%29&diff=134473021&oldid=134465545 02:27, 30 May 2007], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lolita_%28disambiguation%29&diff=134475837&oldid=134473021 02:44, 30 May 2007]; here is number 4: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lolita_%28non-disambiguation%29&diff=134479249&oldid=134475837 03:04, 30 May 2007]. Discussion on the talk page was on-going, with Fateclub, Cuchullain, Jwy and myself all expressing opinions. I can see no useful reason for you to instigate a revert-war while other editors were engaged in good faith discussion about resolving a content dispute. My position was, and remains, to default to the standard disambiguation format, reflecting the letter and spirit of current guidelines, until editors agree on a compromise alternative. Your [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Lolita_%28non-disambiguation%29&diff=134478845&oldid=134476612 recent page-move] was disruptive and uncalled for.-- +++$+++ :Here are your three reverts: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28disambiguation%29&diff=134464839&oldid=133579565 01:43, 30 May 2007], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28disambiguation%29&diff=134473021&oldid=134465545 02:27, 30 May 2007], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28disambiguation%29&diff=134475837&oldid=134473021 02:44, 30 May 2007]; here is number 4: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28non-disambiguation%29&diff=134479249&oldid=134475837 03:04, 30 May 2007]. Discussion on the talk page was on-going, with Fateclub, Cuchullain, Jwy and myself all expressing opinions. I can see no useful reason for you to instigate a revert-war while other editors were engaged in good faith discussion about resolving a content dispute. My position was, and remains, to default to the standard disambiguation format, reflecting the letter and spirit of current guidelines, until editors agree on a compromise alternative. Your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolita_%28non-disambiguation%29&diff=134478845&oldid=134476612 recent page-move] was disruptive and uncalled for.--[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 03:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

283702 +++$+++ jbolden1517 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-30 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.180520340E09 +++$+++ Your first and your second listed articles aren't the same.  And you weren't discussing in good faith with Fateclub that was the problem.  Nor was your position to simply default, you constantly reverted even after strong objects were raised (and not answered).   +++$+++ Your first and your second listed articles aren't the same.  And you weren't discussing in good faith with Fateclub that was the problem.  Nor was your position to simply default, you constantly reverted even after strong objects were raised (and not answered).  [[User:jbolden1517|jbolden1517]]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">[[User talk:jbolden1517|Talk]]</font></sup> 03:19, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
283703 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283702 +++$+++ 283702 +++$+++ 2007-05-30 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.180529340E09 +++$+++ Obviously I disagree with you characterization of my conduct as bad faith, but I'll leave it at that. I hope we can work on the talk page towards a resolution that's acceptable to (and respectful of) all parties.  -- +++$+++ :Obviously I disagree with you characterization of my conduct as bad faith, but I'll leave it at that. I hope we can work on the talk page towards a resolution that's acceptable to (and respectful of) all parties.  --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 05:49, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

527881 +++$+++ Iamunknown +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-29 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.183161060E09 +++$+++ ^demon, I noticed you transcluded [[:Image:CP MEMBER.PNG]] into [[Wikipedia:Protected titles\/Twinkle]].  I don't think it worked.  You added it at 10:59, and now it exists after being uploaded at 11:02.  Just fyi, I didn't realize that cascading protection did not work for images.  :\\  -- +++$+++ ^demon, I noticed you transcluded [[:Image:CP MEMBER.PNG]] into [[Wikipedia:Protected titles/Twinkle]].  I don't think it worked.  You added it at 10:59, and now it exists after being uploaded at 11:02.  Just fyi, I didn't realize that cascading protection did not work for images.  :\  --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 16:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
527882 +++$+++ Prodego +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527881 +++$+++ 527881 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.183161480E09 +++$+++ Two possibilities, 1: the image page's cache was not purged after it was added, or 2: you have to include the image for cascading protection to work, not just transclude.  +++$+++ :Two possibilities, 1: the image page's cache was not purged after it was added, or 2: you have to include the image for cascading protection to work, not just transclude. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 16:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

283704 +++$+++ Drewcifer3000 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-05 06:11:00 +++$+++ 1.181049060E09 +++$+++ Hi Muchness.  I was pleasantly surprised to see that you tagged a few photos I uploaded.  I'm new to this whole asking for permission and GDFL thing, so although I did get permission I didn't know how to document it.  Thanks to the links you provided I've figured it out and sent off the appropriate correspondences to the appropriate people.  I think everything is under control, and hopefully all of these photos will be taken care of soon.  Thanks for the heads up, and if I miss another step feel free to let me know.  +++$+++ Hi Muchness.  I was pleasantly surprised to see that you tagged a few photos I uploaded.  I'm new to this whole asking for permission and GDFL thing, so although I did get permission I didn't know how to document it.  Thanks to the links you provided I've figured it out and sent off the appropriate correspondences to the appropriate people.  I think everything is under control, and hopefully all of these photos will be taken care of soon.  Thanks for the heads up, and if I miss another step feel free to let me know. [[User:Drewcifer3000|Drewcifer3000]] 06:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
283705 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283704 +++$+++ 283704 +++$+++ 2007-06-05 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.181050140E09 +++$+++ No problem, glad that's sorted. -- +++$+++ :No problem, glad that's sorted. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 06:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

262589 +++$+++ ALoan +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-25 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.159249080E09 +++$+++ Hi - you left some comments at [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates\/List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]].  Could you possibly take another look at [[List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]] and see if you are now happy.  Thanks. --  +++$+++ Hi - you left some comments at [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]].  Could you possibly take another look at [[List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]] and see if you are now happy.  Thanks. -- [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] [[User talk:ALoan|(Talk)]] 22:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
262590 +++$+++ Spangineer +++$+++ Colin +++$+++ 262589 +++$+++ 262589 +++$+++ 2006-10-10 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.160544480E09 +++$+++ I'll jump in here too&mdash;I've tried to address your concerns.  Please take a look! -- +++$+++ :I'll jump in here too&mdash;I've tried to address your concerns.  Please take a look! --[[User:Spangineer|Spangineer]]<sup>[[:es:Usuario:Spangineer|es]]</sup>&nbsp;<small><font color="brown">[[User talk:Spangineer|(háblame)]]</font></small> 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

283706 +++$+++ Rabo3 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283706 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-23 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.182593880E09 +++$+++ Anyway, it seems you're up-to-speed on wiki, so I'm just wondering if you'd know what to do about this. +++$+++ Anyway, it seems you're up-to-speed on wiki, so I'm just wondering if you'd know what to do about this.[[User:Rabo3|Rabo3]] 03:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
283707 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283706 +++$+++ 283706 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.182596280E09 +++$+++ Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I've nominated both versions of this image for deletion in accordance with your concerns (see [[commons:Commons:Deletion_requests\/Image:Gravatazeiro_1.jpg|deletion request]]). -- +++$+++ :Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I've nominated both versions of this image for deletion in accordance with your concerns (see [[commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Gravatazeiro_1.jpg|deletion request]]). --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 03:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

283708 +++$+++ 193.61.176.108 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-24 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.182750780E09 +++$+++ Please be aware that some IP addresses relate to shared computers (i.e., library, university, work). I did not edit any article on Steven Gerrard, but work in a university in which shared computers are the norm, so I presume someone else did. I appreciate your diligence in sending a rebuke to the culprit, but please in future consider the possibility of multiple use computers when castigating editors. +++$+++ Please be aware that some IP addresses relate to shared computers (i.e., library, university, work). I did not edit any article on Steven Gerrard, but work in a university in which shared computers are the norm, so I presume someone else did. I appreciate your diligence in sending a rebuke to the culprit, but please in future consider the possibility of multiple use computers when castigating editors.[[User:193.61.176.108|193.61.176.108]] 22:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
283709 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283708 +++$+++ 283708 +++$+++ 2007-06-25 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.182758640E09 +++$+++ Hello. The message was certainly not intended to discourage good faith editors from making constructive edits; this situation is unfortunately one of the pitfalls of shared IPs. The best advice I can offer is to register an account, and encourage others who edit Wikipedia through shared computers to also register accounts. I've added a disclaimer to the IP's talk page, to forestall the possibility future confusion. I hope this is sufficient to address your concerns. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hello. The message was certainly not intended to discourage good faith editors from making constructive edits; this situation is unfortunately one of the pitfalls of shared IPs. The best advice I can offer is to register an account, and encourage others who edit Wikipedia through shared computers to also register accounts. I've added a disclaimer to the IP's talk page, to forestall the possibility future confusion. I hope this is sufficient to address your concerns. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 01:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
283710 +++$+++ 193.61.176.108 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283708 +++$+++ 283709 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.182917580E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding the disclaimer to the IP talk page. It eliminates the feeling of unfathomable persecution!  +++$+++ ::Thanks for adding the disclaimer to the IP talk page. It eliminates the feeling of unfathomable persecution! [[User:193.61.176.108|193.61.176.108]] 21:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
283711 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283708 +++$+++ 283710 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.182920340E09 +++$+++ No problem :) -- +++$+++ :::No problem :) --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 21:59, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
283712 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283708 +++$+++ 283708 +++$+++ 2007-06-26 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.182914040E09 +++$+++ [[WP:EL]] mentions specific criteria where a link to a foreign language site may be appropriate: when it is the official site of an article's subject, when it is a link to a subject's text, or when it contains visual aids. The provided link does not meet any of these criteria. -- +++$+++ :[[WP:EL]] mentions specific criteria where a link to a foreign language site may be appropriate: when it is the official site of an article's subject, when it is a link to a subject's text, or when it contains visual aids. The provided link does not meet any of these criteria. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 20:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

21566 +++$+++ Black Kite +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-19 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.250748720E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised.  Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}<\/code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed Deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy Deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> <b> +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised.  Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed Deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy Deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> <b>[[User talk:Black Kite|<font color="black">Black Kite</font>]]</b> 23:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
21567 +++$+++ Agent0042 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21566 +++$+++ 21566 +++$+++ 2009-08-22 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.250964120E09 +++$+++ It seems to be me that he is going to have to be blocked because he doesn't show any sign of reformation. As soon as the edit block was removed from the page, he swooped back in and added the nonsense content again.  +++$+++ *It seems to be me that he is going to have to be blocked because he doesn't show any sign of reformation. As soon as the edit block was removed from the page, he swooped back in and added the nonsense content again. [[User:Agent0042|Agent0042]] ([[User talk:Agent0042|talk]]) 11:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

21568 +++$+++ 75.4.143.117 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21568 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-24 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.251111300E09 +++$+++ With Noggin rebranded as Nick Jr., will Moose a. Moose and Zee still host, because I feel they would be the perfect two to host Nick Jr.? Please respond when you can. Bob.--[[Special:Contributions\/75.4.143.117|75.4.143.117]] ( +++$+++ With Noggin rebranded as Nick Jr., will Moose a. Moose and Zee still host, because I feel they would be the perfect two to host Nick Jr.? Please respond when you can. Bob.--[[Special:Contributions/75.4.143.117|75.4.143.117]] ([[User talk:75.4.143.117|talk]]) 03:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
21569 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21568 +++$+++ 21568 +++$+++ 2009-08-24 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.251170280E09 +++$+++ I don't know. And right now, I don't care!! For all I know, Happy Jack of ''[[Romper Room]]'' fame could be hosting the new [[Nick Jr. (TV channel)|Nick Jr.]].  +++$+++ :I don't know. And right now, I don't care!! For all I know, Happy Jack of ''[[Romper Room]]'' fame could be hosting the new [[Nick Jr. (TV channel)|Nick Jr.]]. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 20:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
21570 +++$+++ Agent0042 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21568 +++$+++ 21569 +++$+++ 2009-08-25 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.251239640E09 +++$+++ I wish that Moose A. and Zee would stay, but Adam's right-- at this time there is still very little info about the upcoming change. Hopefully something is heard soon. The lack of info is annoying.  +++$+++ ::I wish that Moose A. and Zee would stay, but Adam's right-- at this time there is still very little info about the upcoming change. Hopefully something is heard soon. The lack of info is annoying. [[User:Agent0042|Agent0042]] ([[User talk:Agent0042|talk]]) 15:34, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

283713 +++$+++ 172.131.128.25 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-27 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.183012320E09 +++$+++ Good luck! -- +++$+++ Good luck! --[[User:172.131.128.25|172.131.128.25]] 23:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
283714 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283713 +++$+++ 283713 +++$+++ 2007-06-28 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.183028280E09 +++$+++ An admin has already blocked the account involved in the bulk of the disruptive editing, but if the abusive sockpuppetry persists the remaining accounts should be blocked. I will leave a message to that effect at [[WP:AN\/I]] if the problems persist. -- +++$+++ :An admin has already blocked the account involved in the bulk of the disruptive editing, but if the abusive sockpuppetry persists the remaining accounts should be blocked. I will leave a message to that effect at [[WP:AN/I]] if the problems persist. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 03:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

283715 +++$+++ Greswik +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283715 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-20 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.184992500E09 +++$+++ But you are right of course, as it's unfortunelately impossible to fix one owns edit summaries, they are the one thing to really be careful with.  +++$+++ But you are right of course, as it's unfortunelately impossible to fix one owns edit summaries, they are the one thing to really be careful with. [[User:Greswik|Greswik]] 21:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
283716 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283715 +++$+++ 283715 +++$+++ 2007-07-20 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.184993100E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the misunderstanding, I left a note and apology on your talk page. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Sorry for the misunderstanding, I left a note and apology on your talk page. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 21:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

283717 +++$+++ Butseriouslyfolks +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283717 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-21 23:57:00 +++$+++ 1.185087420E09 +++$+++ Thanks for catching and tagging the copyvio images uploaded by [[User:Mattythewhite]].  I have deleted them along with some others he took, and I have discussed things with him.  Hopefully, he now understands the applicable policies. --'''<span style=\"background:Black;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ Thanks for catching and tagging the copyvio images uploaded by [[User:Mattythewhite]].  I have deleted them along with some others he took, and I have discussed things with him.  Hopefully, he now understands the applicable policies. --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Bsf|<font color="White">But</font>]]|[[User talk:Bsf|<font color="White">seriously</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Butseriouslyfolks|<font color="White">folks</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 23:57, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
283718 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283717 +++$+++ 283717 +++$+++ 2007-07-22 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.185087780E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. I left a follow-up note on your talk page. -- +++$+++ :You're welcome. I left a follow-up note on your talk page. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 00:03, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
283719 +++$+++ Butseriouslyfolks +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283717 +++$+++ 283718 +++$+++ 2007-07-22 00:09:00 +++$+++ 1.185088140E09 +++$+++ I was wondering about #7 on that page! --'''<span style=\"background:Black;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ ::I was wondering about #7 on that page! --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Bsf|<font color="White">But</font>]]|[[User talk:Bsf|<font color="White">seriously</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Butseriouslyfolks|<font color="White">folks</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 00:09, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
283720 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283717 +++$+++ 283719 +++$+++ 2007-07-22 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.185089040E09 +++$+++ &nbsp;:) -- +++$+++ :::&nbsp;:) --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 00:24, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
283721 +++$+++ Butseriouslyfolks +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283717 +++$+++ 283720 +++$+++ 2007-07-22 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.185151020E09 +++$+++ He says he was using the same type of camera used to take those pictures (according to the exif data), but wasn't sure whether they were his.  He does acknowledge that if they appear on the rivals.net websites, they're not his.  I'll continue to [[WP:AGF]] and delete the ones I can find elsewhere, and see if the exif data can help distinguish them.  Thanks for all of your work on this to keep Wikipedia safe! --'''<span style=\"background:Black;color:White\">&nbsp; +++$+++ ::::He says he was using the same type of camera used to take those pictures (according to the exif data), but wasn't sure whether they were his.  He does acknowledge that if they appear on the rivals.net websites, they're not his.  I'll continue to [[WP:AGF]] and delete the ones I can find elsewhere, and see if the exif data can help distinguish them.  Thanks for all of your work on this to keep Wikipedia safe! --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White">&nbsp;[[User:Bsf|<font color="White">But</font>]]|[[User talk:Bsf|<font color="White">seriously</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Butseriouslyfolks|<font color="White">folks</font>]]&nbsp;</span>''' 17:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

545862 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545862 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-10 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.242005820E09 +++$+++ FIY I've closed this AfD since you didn't mention trying to find any sources in your nomination. To avoid this issue in the future, please summarise what you've done to try to verify content before nominating an article for deletion. All the best  +++$+++ FIY I've closed this AfD since you didn't mention trying to find any sources in your nomination. To avoid this issue in the future, please summarise what you've done to try to verify content before nominating an article for deletion. All the best [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 18:37, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
545863 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545862 +++$+++ 545862 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.242007020E09 +++$+++ There's no requirement to look for sources before nominating an article. It may be recommended, but isn't mandatory. I won't take this any further because the discussion was obviously headed towards keeping, but if it were not, I would be going to DRV.  +++$+++ :There's no requirement to look for sources before nominating an article. It may be recommended, but isn't mandatory. I won't take this any further because the discussion was obviously headed towards keeping, but if it were not, I would be going to DRV. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 18:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
545864 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545862 +++$+++ 545863 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.242007260E09 +++$+++ I must have misunderstood your nomination then, I thought you had nominated this under the criterion ''\"Articles for which all attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed\".''  +++$+++ ::I must have misunderstood your nomination then, I thought you had nominated this under the criterion ''"Articles for which all attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed".'' [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 19:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
545865 +++$+++ Stifle +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545862 +++$+++ 545864 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.242007800E09 +++$+++ No, it was because the article as I nominated it failed to comply with the [[WP:V]] policy by providing sources, and as it had been tagged for approaching three years, I thought it reasonable to believe that the existence of sources was unlikely.  +++$+++ :::No, it was because the article as I nominated it failed to comply with the [[WP:V]] policy by providing sources, and as it had been tagged for approaching three years, I thought it reasonable to believe that the existence of sources was unlikely. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 19:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

484193 +++$+++ RC-0722 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-24 17:14:00 +++$+++ 1.201223640E09 +++$+++ Hey man, sorry I couldn't reply on nelsons talk page. He just keeps reverting all my posts and marking them as harassment. Anyway, I'm promoting we do something Change the article description (on the disambig page) to \"American football player for the Carolina Panthers\" or \"American football player for the New York Giants\"  +++$+++ Hey man, sorry I couldn't reply on nelsons talk page. He just keeps reverting all my posts and marking them as harassment. Anyway, I'm promoting we do something Change the article description (on the disambig page) to "American football player for the Carolina Panthers" or "American football player for the New York Giants" [[User:RC-0722|RC-0722]] ([[User talk:RC-0722|talk]]) 17:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
484194 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484193 +++$+++ 484193 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 17:30:00 +++$+++ 1.201224600E09 +++$+++ Yes, I'd recommend staying away from Chrisjnelson.  It's best to leave people alone when they give clear signs like that.  The text on the disambiguation page is not what's at issue in that discussion.  We're talking about the ''title'' of the articles themselves.  The text in big font at the top of every page is that page's title.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Yes, I'd recommend staying away from Chrisjnelson.  It's best to leave people alone when they give clear signs like that.  The text on the disambiguation page is not what's at issue in that discussion.  We're talking about the ''title'' of the articles themselves.  The text in big font at the top of every page is that page's title.  —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 17:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
484195 +++$+++ RC-0722 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484193 +++$+++ 484194 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.201224900E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'm going to try to stay away from him. But what I'm saying is that if we change the disambig article description; we can change the article name to something without an initial or team name.  +++$+++ ::Yeah, I'm going to try to stay away from him. But what I'm saying is that if we change the disambig article description; we can change the article name to something without an initial or team name. [[User:RC-0722|RC-0722]] ([[User talk:RC-0722|talk]]) 17:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
484196 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484193 +++$+++ 484195 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.201225020E09 +++$+++ But disambiguation pages aren't the driving force behind article naming.  Per [[WP:NC]], [[WP:D]], etc., article names are supposed to be something that make sense while still being unique.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::But disambiguation pages aren't the driving force behind article naming.  Per [[WP:NC]], [[WP:D]], etc., article names are supposed to be something that make sense while still being unique.  —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 17:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
484197 +++$+++ RC-0722 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484193 +++$+++ 484196 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.201226160E09 +++$+++ Well, this is going to sound a little far out, but wouldn't Giants.com have the franchises phone (or fax)?  +++$+++ ::::Well, this is going to sound a little far out, but wouldn't Giants.com have the franchises phone (or fax)? [[User:RC-0722|RC-0722]] ([[User talk:RC-0722|talk]]) 17:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
484198 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484193 +++$+++ 484197 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.201226700E09 +++$+++ I don't know what this means.  \u2014 +++$+++ :::::I don't know what this means.  —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 18:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

527884 +++$+++ DHowell +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-29 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.183174500E09 +++$+++ Is there some reason you are deleting orphaned fairuse images before the seven days are up? I see no change to [[WP:CSD#I5]], and yet you have deleted [[:Category:Orphaned_fairuse_images_as_of_24_June_2007]], [[:Category:Orphaned_fairuse_images_as_of_25_June_2007]], and [[:Category:Orphaned_fairuse_images_as_of_26_June_2007]] and I assume all the images in those categories. What gives?  +++$+++ Is there some reason you are deleting orphaned fairuse images before the seven days are up? I see no change to [[WP:CSD#I5]], and yet you have deleted [[:Category:Orphaned_fairuse_images_as_of_24_June_2007]], [[:Category:Orphaned_fairuse_images_as_of_25_June_2007]], and [[:Category:Orphaned_fairuse_images_as_of_26_June_2007]] and I assume all the images in those categories. What gives? [[User:DHowell|DHowell]] 20:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
527885 +++$+++ DHowell +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527884 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-29 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.183182180E09 +++$+++ Were all the images you deleted uploaded '''after 2006-07-13'''? What about the last sentence that gives seven days for images that fail #7? The seven day is also repeated in [[:Category:Orphaned fairuse images]] and [[:Template:Orphaned fairuse not replaced]]. Don't you think you ought to have gotten consensus before deleting thousands of images under a novel interpretation of policy? Will you restore any images that were uploaded before 2006-07-13, which clearly must be given 7 days, not 48 hours per the above policy? I also noticed from your talk pages that some images were deleted without checking if they '''were''' used in a page, which indicates to me that you may have simply indiscriminately deleted all tagged images, rather than properly checking; given the speed at which these images were deleted, I'd say this is likely. Please note that mass out-of-process deletions are what got [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Betacommand|Betacommand stripped of his admin powers]].  +++$+++ ::Were all the images you deleted uploaded '''after 2006-07-13'''? What about the last sentence that gives seven days for images that fail #7? The seven day is also repeated in [[:Category:Orphaned fairuse images]] and [[:Template:Orphaned fairuse not replaced]]. Don't you think you ought to have gotten consensus before deleting thousands of images under a novel interpretation of policy? Will you restore any images that were uploaded before 2006-07-13, which clearly must be given 7 days, not 48 hours per the above policy? I also noticed from your talk pages that some images were deleted without checking if they '''were''' used in a page, which indicates to me that you may have simply indiscriminately deleted all tagged images, rather than properly checking; given the speed at which these images were deleted, I'd say this is likely. Please note that mass out-of-process deletions are what got [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Betacommand|Betacommand stripped of his admin powers]]. [[User:DHowell|DHowell]] 22:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
527886 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527884 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-30 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.183194480E09 +++$+++ DHowell, check your facts, and please dont say libel statements about me. If your going to quote arbcom case and use it to support your POV please read it first, and get your facts straight otherwise shut up. [[WP:NFCC]] trumps CSD. NFCC Was set by the foundation, CSD was not. [[User:Betacommand|Betacommand]] <sup>([[User talk:Betacommand|talk]] \u2022 [[Special:Contributions\/Betacommand|contribs]] \u2022  +++$+++ ::DHowell, check your facts, and please dont say libel statements about me. If your going to quote arbcom case and use it to support your POV please read it first, and get your facts straight otherwise shut up. [[WP:NFCC]] trumps CSD. NFCC Was set by the foundation, CSD was not. [[User:Betacommand|Betacommand]] <sup>([[User talk:Betacommand|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Betacommand|contribs]] • [[User:BetacommandBot|Bot]])</sup> 02:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
527887 +++$+++ DHowell +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527884 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-06-30 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.183196820E09 +++$+++ What \"libel statements\"? If my statements are libelous than you had better prepare your libel case against the ArbCom, because I am merely reporting their [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Betacommand#Automated image deletion|findings of fact]], particlarly (1) and (2.1); and their [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/Betacommand#Betacommand desysopped|remedy]]. And please get your facts straight. [[WP:NFCC]] was not set by the foundation, you are mistaking it for the [[foundation:Resolution:Licensing policy|Foundation licensing policy]]. And NFCC also says \"''An image on which fair use is claimed that is used in no article (Criterion 7) may be deleted seven days after notification.''\"  +++$+++ :::What "libel statements"? If my statements are libelous than you had better prepare your libel case against the ArbCom, because I am merely reporting their [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Betacommand#Automated image deletion|findings of fact]], particlarly (1) and (2.1); and their [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Betacommand#Betacommand desysopped|remedy]]. And please get your facts straight. [[WP:NFCC]] was not set by the foundation, you are mistaking it for the [[foundation:Resolution:Licensing policy|Foundation licensing policy]]. And NFCC also says "''An image on which fair use is claimed that is used in no article (Criterion 7) may be deleted seven days after notification.''" [[User:DHowell|DHowell]] 02:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

283722 +++$+++ Me677 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-23 00:27:00 +++$+++ 1.185175620E09 +++$+++ RE: Matty's photos. Perhaps a little more tact could be used with the lad who's clearly taken a lot of them himself - a bit of perspective and joviality wouldn't go amiss on this website. Anyway, [[Image_talk:David_mcgurk7.jpg]] is a case in point. All the best.  +++$+++ RE: Matty's photos. Perhaps a little more tact could be used with the lad who's clearly taken a lot of them himself - a bit of perspective and joviality wouldn't go amiss on this website. Anyway, [[Image_talk:David_mcgurk7.jpg]] is a case in point. All the best. [[User:Me677|Me677]] 00:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
283723 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283722 +++$+++ 283722 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.185177120E09 +++$+++ If you'll review his [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=upload&user=Mattythewhite&page= upload log], you can see he has been engaging in large scale copyright violations. Furthermore, he's declined to be upfront about image sourcing, forcing other editors to comb through his contribs trying to track down possible copyright violations. Of course civility is an important part of editing Wikipedia, but when a user engages in serious policy violations (in this case, violating copyright and [[WP:IUP]]) after repeated notices, warnings and discussion, sometimes administrative action needs to be taken as a last recourse. -- +++$+++ :If you'll review his [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=upload&user=Mattythewhite&page= upload log], you can see he has been engaging in large scale copyright violations. Furthermore, he's declined to be upfront about image sourcing, forcing other editors to comb through his contribs trying to track down possible copyright violations. Of course civility is an important part of editing Wikipedia, but when a user engages in serious policy violations (in this case, violating copyright and [[WP:IUP]]) after repeated notices, warnings and discussion, sometimes administrative action needs to be taken as a last recourse. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 00:52, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

283724 +++$+++ DanMS +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-22 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.185166320E09 +++$+++ I added a note on [[Talk:Jitterbug]] that you had closed the move request. (I also sometimes forget to sign!) &#9679; +++$+++ I added a note on [[Talk:Jitterbug]] that you had closed the move request. (I also sometimes forget to sign!) &#9679;[[User:DanMS|DanMS]] • [[User talk:DanMS|Talk]] 21:52, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
283725 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283724 +++$+++ 283724 +++$+++ 2007-07-22 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.185166500E09 +++$+++ Thank you! -- +++$+++ :Thank you! --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 21:55, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

21581 +++$+++ Renaboss +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-20 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.253496180E09 +++$+++ Hi there, you asked me for help. The problem is, most vandals often don't have accounts, so we can't really talk to them by leaving them messages in their talk pages, and besides, I am not an admin, so I don't really have the power to block anyone. The person keeps adding Kathryn Joosten to the main cast list because she was listed between Dana Delany and Drea de Matteo in the press release for the first episode of season six, however, in the next two press releases the cast order has been changed again and again. I say, yet again, maybe we should revert the list to its alphabetical order, because the official press releases have only brought confusion with them, we still don't know the exact order. --  +++$+++ Hi there, you asked me for help. The problem is, most vandals often don't have accounts, so we can't really talk to them by leaving them messages in their talk pages, and besides, I am not an admin, so I don't really have the power to block anyone. The person keeps adding Kathryn Joosten to the main cast list because she was listed between Dana Delany and Drea de Matteo in the press release for the first episode of season six, however, in the next two press releases the cast order has been changed again and again. I say, yet again, maybe we should revert the list to its alphabetical order, because the official press releases have only brought confusion with them, we still don't know the exact order. -- [[User:Renaboss|Renaboss]] ([[User talk:Renaboss|talk]]) 18:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
21582 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21581 +++$+++ 21581 +++$+++ 2009-09-22 13:34:00 +++$+++ 1.253651640E09 +++$+++ The reason why I am putting in the lo-qual PNG of the TeenNick logo back in the article is because I don't like the hi-qual SVG of the logo you uploaded. That logo had a small \"T\". I like the PNG logo with the large \"T\" better.  +++$+++ :The reason why I am putting in the lo-qual PNG of the TeenNick logo back in the article is because I don't like the hi-qual SVG of the logo you uploaded. That logo had a small "T". I like the PNG logo with the large "T" better. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 13:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
21583 +++$+++ GSK +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21581 +++$+++ 21582 +++$+++ 2009-09-22 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.253654640E09 +++$+++ You shouldn't be editing things out of articles based on your personal preference. --<span style=\"text-shadow:silver 2px 2px 2px\">&nbsp; +++$+++ ::You shouldn't be editing things out of articles based on your personal preference. --<span style="text-shadow:silver 2px 2px 2px">&nbsp;[[User:GSK|GSK]] ([[User_talk:GSK|talk]] ● [[Special:Contributions/GSK|evidence]])</span> 14:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

283726 +++$+++ Pascal.Tesson +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283726 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-23 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.185228240E09 +++$+++ Hi. I was away so I did not get your message about the image uploads of Mattythewhite. But I see that {{user|Butseriouslyfolks}} has taken care of it all. In any case thanks a lot for making admins aware of such problems. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi. I was away so I did not get your message about the image uploads of Mattythewhite. But I see that {{user|Butseriouslyfolks}} has taken care of it all. In any case thanks a lot for making admins aware of such problems. Cheers, [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] 15:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
283727 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283726 +++$+++ 283726 +++$+++ 2007-07-23 18:12:00 +++$+++ 1.185239520E09 +++$+++ No problem, thanks. -- +++$+++ :No problem, thanks. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 18:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

283728 +++$+++ Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283728 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-09 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.186653300E09 +++$+++ Thanks for saving my image, were you able to save the other person's also? It was a nice photo. If I was able to find my original, I would have reloaded it under a different name, to save the other person's, but I deleted the original to make room on the camera. -- +++$+++ Thanks for saving my image, were you able to save the other person's also? It was a nice photo. If I was able to find my original, I would have reloaded it under a different name, to save the other person's, but I deleted the original to make room on the camera. --[[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] 02:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
283729 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283728 +++$+++ 283728 +++$+++ 2007-08-09 07:04:00 +++$+++ 1.186668240E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately the other editor didn't include source or licensing info when uploading the photo, so I didn't feel comfortable taking the liberty of re-uploading it myself.  I left a note on the editor's talk page requesting a re-upload under a new name. -- +++$+++ :Unfortunately the other editor didn't include source or licensing info when uploading the photo, so I didn't feel comfortable taking the liberty of re-uploading it myself.  I left a note on the editor's talk page requesting a re-upload under a new name. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 07:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

47288 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47288 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-09-23 22:29:00 +++$+++ 1.159075740E09 +++$+++ Thanks! After playing over Karpov-Kasparov, I was pretty sure R v. BNN was a draw. (As I recall, Kasparov said he was surprised how few winning chances there were.) The defender constantly harasses the other side with checks and threats of RxB.  (Another way to look at it is that KNN v. K is a draw and KBN v. K is just barely a win, so it's not surprising that if you give the attacker an extra minor piece over those endings, but give the defender a better piece (a rook), the defender can draw.) But it's good to have confirmation:  I would have bet heavily that RN v. BB was normally a draw, but the computers say the RN side wins. BBN v. R ''is'' a win, which doesn't surprise me: it's much harder for the defender, since exchange sacrifices don't work, and the attacker thus can interpose a bishop to a check.  +++$+++ Thanks! After playing over Karpov-Kasparov, I was pretty sure R v. BNN was a draw. (As I recall, Kasparov said he was surprised how few winning chances there were.) The defender constantly harasses the other side with checks and threats of RxB.  (Another way to look at it is that KNN v. K is a draw and KBN v. K is just barely a win, so it's not surprising that if you give the attacker an extra minor piece over those endings, but give the defender a better piece (a rook), the defender can draw.) But it's good to have confirmation:  I would have bet heavily that RN v. BB was normally a draw, but the computers say the RN side wins. BBN v. R ''is'' a win, which doesn't surprise me: it's much harder for the defender, since exchange sacrifices don't work, and the attacker thus can interpose a bishop to a check. [[User:Krakatoa|Krakatoa]] 22:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
47289 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47288 +++$+++ 47288 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.161068400E09 +++$+++ Do you know of a page that summarizes the normal result of the six-piece endgames?   +++$+++ : Do you know of a page that summarizes the normal result of the six-piece endgames?  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 00:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
47290 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47288 +++$+++ 47289 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.161069360E09 +++$+++ RN vs. BB - the R&N usually win for same-colored bishops, but draw for opposite-colored bishops.  ''Secrets of Pawnless Endings'', page 341, says it ''offers few winning chances unless the attacker starts with a very favorable position''.   +++$+++ :: RN vs. BB - the R&N usually win for same-colored bishops, but draw for opposite-colored bishops.  ''Secrets of Pawnless Endings'', page 341, says it ''offers few winning chances unless the attacker starts with a very favorable position''.  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 00:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
47291 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47288 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-17 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.161142860E09 +++$+++ ''Secrets of Pawnless endings''' has a table of the ones w\/o pawns that were finished at that time, including those two endings.  Somewhere I've seen the complete list, but I can't find it.   +++$+++ :::: ''Secrets of Pawnless endings''' has a table of the ones w/o pawns that were finished at that time, including those two endings.  Somewhere I've seen the complete list, but I can't find it.  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 20:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

283730 +++$+++ George1966 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-14 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.187081160E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've sent through an email with attached correspondence re the pictures I uploaded.  I'll put in a tag on all the pictures pages to say that I've done so as well.  Thanks for helping out a novice.   +++$+++ Hi, I've sent through an email with attached correspondence re the pictures I uploaded.  I'll put in a tag on all the pictures pages to say that I've done so as well.  Thanks for helping out a novice.  [[User:George1966|George1966]] 01:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
283731 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283730 +++$+++ 283730 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.187082420E09 +++$+++ No problem, thanks. -- +++$+++ :No problem, thanks. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 02:07, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
283732 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283730 +++$+++ 283730 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.187567280E09 +++$+++ Hello, look under the \"Additional Information\" heading on the [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/stella_gonzales\/483073721\/ source image's page]; the image is released under cc-by-2.0 license. The image you uploaded is copyright; see the notice under the \"Additional Information\" heading [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/81357342@N00\/915915876]. -- +++$+++ :Hello, look under the "Additional Information" heading on the [http://www.flickr.com/photos/stella_gonzales/483073721/ source image's page]; the image is released under cc-by-2.0 license. The image you uploaded is copyright; see the notice under the "Additional Information" heading [http://www.flickr.com/photos/81357342@N00/915915876]. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 16:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

21587 +++$+++ IAmTheCoinMan +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21587 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-29 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.259485620E09 +++$+++ \"The general convention, per the TV project guidelines, is that we list all roles that are deemed as main characters by the producers and network. That is to say, it is a function of their contract status, and not of our opinion as to who is important and who is not. As well, we don't differentiate based on seasons, former or current status, and so on. Again per the guidelines, if the infobox listing is considered to be too large, it can be replaced with a link to the \"Characters\" section.\" +++$+++ "The general convention, per the TV project guidelines, is that we list all roles that are deemed as main characters by the producers and network. That is to say, it is a function of their contract status, and not of our opinion as to who is important and who is not. As well, we don't differentiate based on seasons, former or current status, and so on. Again per the guidelines, if the infobox listing is considered to be too large, it can be replaced with a link to the "Characters" section."[[User:IAmTheCoinMan|IAmTheCoinMan]] ([[User talk:IAmTheCoinMan|talk]]) 01:07, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
21588 +++$+++ IAmTheCoinMan +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21587 +++$+++ 21587 +++$+++ 2009-11-29 23:31:00 +++$+++ 1.259566260E09 +++$+++ why are you so arrogant? +++$+++ :why are you so arrogant?[[User:IAmTheCoinMan|IAmTheCoinMan]] ([[User talk:IAmTheCoinMan|talk]]) 23:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

283733 +++$+++ The-Real-ZEUS +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.187576700E09 +++$+++ Is this ok ? http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:DELLASAEK.jpg  +++$+++ Is this ok ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:DELLASAEK.jpg [[User:The-real-zeus|The-real-zeus]] 19:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
283734 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283733 +++$+++ 283733 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 23:56:00 +++$+++ 1.187592960E09 +++$+++ Hello, unfortunately there are still possible problems with the images you uploaded; we have to consider whether the licenses used by the Flickr uploader are accurate. Please feel free to join the discussions at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images\/2007 August 19#Image:Demis33.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :Hello, unfortunately there are still possible problems with the images you uploaded; we have to consider whether the licenses used by the Flickr uploader are accurate. Please feel free to join the discussions at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 August 19#Image:Demis33.jpg]]. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 23:56, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

21590 +++$+++ Gran2 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-21 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.261455900E09 +++$+++ Hi there! The source you have found to say that Nicollette Sheridan will be appearing in Deathly Hallows doesn't appear to be very reliable; it looks like a fansite with no official links to Sheridan or any press mention so seems to conflict with Wikipedia's [[WP:RS|reliable sourcing policies]]. Do you have any more sources which are reporting her casting? If this site is the only one I think it would be best to hold of until we have more confirmation. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi there! The source you have found to say that Nicollette Sheridan will be appearing in Deathly Hallows doesn't appear to be very reliable; it looks like a fansite with no official links to Sheridan or any press mention so seems to conflict with Wikipedia's [[WP:RS|reliable sourcing policies]]. Do you have any more sources which are reporting her casting? If this site is the only one I think it would be best to hold of until we have more confirmation. Thanks. [[User:Gran2|Gran]]<sup>[[User talk:Gran2|2]]</sup> 20:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
21591 +++$+++ Gran2 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21590 +++$+++ 21590 +++$+++ 2009-12-22 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.261525140E09 +++$+++ I thought that was the most likely scenario, thanks. I'll remove it.  +++$+++ :I thought that was the most likely scenario, thanks. I'll remove it. [[User:Gran2|Gran]]<sup>[[User talk:Gran2|2]]</sup> 15:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

283735 +++$+++ The-Real-ZEUS +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-20 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.187654100E09 +++$+++ So how are u gonna concider weither the licences used by Fluckr are accurate...? ,and if this image has to bee conciderd than http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Image:Petercrouch_liverpool.JPG should be to..?  +++$+++ So how are u gonna concider weither the licences used by Fluckr are accurate...? ,and if this image has to bee conciderd than http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Petercrouch_liverpool.JPG should be to..? [[User:The-real-zeus|The-real-zeus]] 16:55, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
283736 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283735 +++$+++ 283735 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.187655000E09 +++$+++ It's a matter of reviewing the evidence and making a judgment on a case-by-case basis. There is strong evidence, as I noted on the [[WP:PUI]] listings, that the Flickr uploader does not own the copyrights for the images he or she uploaded, which means that the uploader doesn't have the right to release the image under a cc-by-sa license. If you have evidence to the contrary, please make a note of it on the image listings at WP:PUI. Also, if you have reason to believe that the Flickr user who uploaded the Peter Crouch image didn't take the photo and\/or is not the copyright holder, by all means list the image at [[WP:PUI]]. -- +++$+++ :It's a matter of reviewing the evidence and making a judgment on a case-by-case basis. There is strong evidence, as I noted on the [[WP:PUI]] listings, that the Flickr uploader does not own the copyrights for the images he or she uploaded, which means that the uploader doesn't have the right to release the image under a cc-by-sa license. If you have evidence to the contrary, please make a note of it on the image listings at WP:PUI. Also, if you have reason to believe that the Flickr user who uploaded the Peter Crouch image didn't take the photo and/or is not the copyright holder, by all means list the image at [[WP:PUI]]. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 17:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
283737 +++$+++ The-Real-ZEUS +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283735 +++$+++ 283735 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.187741040E09 +++$+++ So wat happens now..???  +++$+++ * So wat happens now..??? [[User:The-real-zeus|The-real-zeus]] 17:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
283738 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283735 +++$+++ 283737 +++$+++ 2007-08-21 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.187750280E09 +++$+++ Interested parties will consider the issue and an admin will make a decision following a 14-day period for discussion. -- +++$+++ ::Interested parties will consider the issue and an admin will make a decision following a 14-day period for discussion. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 19:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
283739 +++$+++ The-Real-ZEUS +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283735 +++$+++ 283735 +++$+++ 2007-08-23 17:36:00 +++$+++ 1.187915760E09 +++$+++ Ok thank you.. +++$+++ *Ok thank you..[[User:The-real-zeus|The-real-zeus]] 17:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

546578 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-09 12:55:00 +++$+++ 1.228856100E09 +++$+++ Hi. I notice that you seem to have used one too many ~ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008\/Vote\/Risker&diff=prev&oldid=256812445 here], omitting your name from the timestamp equation. I've added it for clarity's sake, since I'm your follow-up voter, but wanted to point it out in case you'd like to remove my note and clarify it yourself. :) -- +++$+++ Hi. I notice that you seem to have used one too many ~ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008/Vote/Risker&diff=prev&oldid=256812445 here], omitting your name from the timestamp equation. I've added it for clarity's sake, since I'm your follow-up voter, but wanted to point it out in case you'd like to remove my note and clarify it yourself. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 12:55, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
546579 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546578 +++$+++ 546578 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 13:09:00 +++$+++ 1.228856940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your heads-up note about my missing sig. I went ahead and corrected my typo. (Of course, I'll always blame it on this lousy keyboard rather than these spastic fingers.) Cheers  <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Thanks for your heads-up note about my missing sig. I went ahead and corrected my typo. (Of course, I'll always blame it on this lousy keyboard rather than these spastic fingers.) Cheers  <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 13:09, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
546580 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546578 +++$+++ 546579 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.228858020E09 +++$+++ LOL! No problem. :) I figure this one probably happens often enough that the powers that be should make an automated warning--did you really mean to use that many ~? -- +++$+++ ::LOL! No problem. :) I figure this one probably happens often enough that the powers that be should make an automated warning--did you really mean to use that many ~? --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 13:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

283740 +++$+++ EEMeltonIV +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283740 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-25 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.188109080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for lending support for the removal of the fan mod. material from KotOR 2. Not surprisingly, the anon. editor has again added the material :-\/. -- +++$+++ Thanks for lending support for the removal of the fan mod. material from KotOR 2. Not surprisingly, the anon. editor has again added the material :-/. --[[User:EEMeltonIV|EEMeltonIV]] 23:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
283741 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283740 +++$+++ 283740 +++$+++ 2007-08-25 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.188109980E09 +++$+++ It may be necessary to report at [[WP:AN\/3RR]] or [[WP:AIV]] if the unsourced content continues to be added to the article. -- +++$+++ :It may be necessary to report at [[WP:AN/3RR]] or [[WP:AIV]] if the unsourced content continues to be added to the article. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 23:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

283742 +++$+++ EEMeltonIV +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283742 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-27 04:32:00 +++$+++ 1.188214320E09 +++$+++ Follow-up: would appreciate your comments on the talk page to substantiate argument that the should-be-deleted material (which was restored prior to the page being protected) should be axed. -- +++$+++ Follow-up: would appreciate your comments on the talk page to substantiate argument that the should-be-deleted material (which was restored prior to the page being protected) should be axed. --[[User:EEMeltonIV|EEMeltonIV]] 04:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
283743 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283742 +++$+++ 283742 +++$+++ 2007-08-28 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.188336060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up, I'll look into it. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up, I'll look into it. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 14:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
283744 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283742 +++$+++ 283742 +++$+++ 2007-09-02 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.188744420E09 +++$+++ Hello. Content in Wikipedia articles should a) rely on reliable, third-party published sources and b) be appropriate for the article's subject. The article in question, [[Blogger (service)]], is an encyclopedic overview of the Blogger publishing system, not an itemization of people and entities that use the system. A mention of this design course may be appropriate in an article subsection that gives a general overview of the use of the Blogger service in academia, assuming sources that meet [[WP:V]] can be found for the content. Please feel free to discuss this matter further on the article's [[Talk:Blogger (service)|talk page]]. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hello. Content in Wikipedia articles should a) rely on reliable, third-party published sources and b) be appropriate for the article's subject. The article in question, [[Blogger (service)]], is an encyclopedic overview of the Blogger publishing system, not an itemization of people and entities that use the system. A mention of this design course may be appropriate in an article subsection that gives a general overview of the use of the Blogger service in academia, assuming sources that meet [[WP:V]] can be found for the content. Please feel free to discuss this matter further on the article's [[Talk:Blogger (service)|talk page]]. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 07:47, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

283745 +++$+++ Alexf +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283745 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-04 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.188950460E09 +++$+++ Thanks for helping on [[Robinho]] today. I am on [[WP:3RR]] risk there. A suspected sockpuppeteer [[User:AnonymousDude1993]] and sockpuppets [[User:Futbolfan]] and [[User:IamRobinho]] are making the same DOB change adding the same comments that ''\"he heard on TV that [[Robinho]] is 19 yrs old\"''. Sockpupeteer has been reported to: [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/AnonymousDude1993]]. Please keep an eye on this one. Thanks!  +++$+++ Thanks for helping on [[Robinho]] today. I am on [[WP:3RR]] risk there. A suspected sockpuppeteer [[User:AnonymousDude1993]] and sockpuppets [[User:Futbolfan]] and [[User:IamRobinho]] are making the same DOB change adding the same comments that ''"he heard on TV that [[Robinho]] is 19 yrs old"''. Sockpupeteer has been reported to: [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/AnonymousDude1993]]. Please keep an eye on this one. Thanks! [[User:Alexf|Alexf]]<small><sup>([[User talk:Alexf|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Alexf|Contribs]])</sup></small> 17:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
283746 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283745 +++$+++ 283745 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.188950580E09 +++$+++ No problem, I've added the article to my watchlist and will keep an eye on things. -- +++$+++ :No problem, I've added the article to my watchlist and will keep an eye on things. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 17:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

283747 +++$+++ 1redrun +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283747 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-04 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.188962040E09 +++$+++ Hi, for some reason there seems to be an edit war in this article about his real age. I hope you have more knowledge of soccer than I have (I only stumbled onto the article as the edit summary made me suspicious).  +++$+++ Hi, for some reason there seems to be an edit war in this article about his real age. I hope you have more knowledge of soccer than I have (I only stumbled onto the article as the edit summary made me suspicious). [[User:1redrun|<font color="Black">'''1</font><font color="Red">redrun'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:1redrun|<font color="Blue">Talk</font>]]</sup> 20:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
283748 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283747 +++$+++ 283747 +++$+++ 2007-09-05 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.189017480E09 +++$+++ Apparently it may have been one editor using sockpuppets to push dubious and unsourced edits to the article (see above post). At any rate, official sources such as the Real Madrid website and news sources agree that his birthday is January 25, 1984 (e.g., [http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/sport1\/shared\/bsp\/hi\/football\/statistics\/players\/internationals\/r\/robinho_251193.stm], [http:\/\/www.realmadrid.com\/articulo\/rma25231.htm]). -- +++$+++ :Apparently it may have been one editor using sockpuppets to push dubious and unsourced edits to the article (see above post). At any rate, official sources such as the Real Madrid website and news sources agree that his birthday is January 25, 1984 (e.g., [http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/shared/bsp/hi/football/statistics/players/internationals/r/robinho_251193.stm], [http://www.realmadrid.com/articulo/rma25231.htm]). --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 11:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

283749 +++$+++ Serminigo +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283749 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-16 18:32:00 +++$+++ 1.189992720E09 +++$+++ Look as long as the Unicode symbol has an article that's a good thing.  It shouldn't matter if it is long or short, people still need to know about it.  +++$+++ Look as long as the Unicode symbol has an article that's a good thing.  It shouldn't matter if it is long or short, people still need to know about it. [[User:Serminigo|Serminigo]] 18:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
283750 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283749 +++$+++ 283749 +++$+++ 2007-09-16 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.189993260E09 +++$+++ Please discuss this on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:%E2%80%AB%E2%80%AC%E2%80%AD%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AA%E2%80%AB%E2%80%AC%E2%80%AD%E2%80%AE%D2%89 the article's talk page], as the article was previously proposed for deletion and changed to a redirect by multiple editors. Topics should have articles on Wikipedia if they meet [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability guidelines]], and it's debatable whether this symbol is sufficiently notable to warrant its own article. -- +++$+++ :Please discuss this on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:%E2%80%AB%E2%80%AC%E2%80%AD%E2%80%AE%E2%80%AA%E2%80%AB%E2%80%AC%E2%80%AD%E2%80%AE%D2%89 the article's talk page], as the article was previously proposed for deletion and changed to a redirect by multiple editors. Topics should have articles on Wikipedia if they meet [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability guidelines]], and it's debatable whether this symbol is sufficiently notable to warrant its own article. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 18:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

283751 +++$+++ Sennen goroshi +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283751 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-03 05:31:00 +++$+++ 1.191414660E09 +++$+++ give me your personal opinion, is an article with citations and written in a mature manner, about shart, ever going to remain without being deleted? or will i just waste my time if i make it? +++$+++ give me your personal opinion, is an article with citations and written in a mature manner, about shart, ever going to remain without being deleted? or will i just waste my time if i make it?[[User:Sennen goroshi|Sennen goroshi]] 05:31, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
283752 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283751 +++$+++ 283751 +++$+++ 2007-10-03 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.191415860E09 +++$+++ To avoid deletion, the article must cite [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and must be encyclopedic, not just a dictionary definition. My personal opinion is that at this time an article on the term will be deleted, because there are not currently sufficient reliable sources, and the term is not currently in sufficiently widespread usage. I don't feel that the source you provided, [http:\/\/www.billcasselman.com\/new_words\/one_shart.htm], is by itself sufficient to establish the term's notability per [[WP:NEO#Articles on neologisms|WP:NEO]]. If you're concerned that an article on this term may be deleted, you can create a draft article in your [[Special:Mypage\/Sandbox|personal sandbox]] and work on it with other interested editors. Also bear in mind that as the term gains popularity and more widespread usage, it may at some future point become sufficiently notable to warrant a Wikipedia article. -- +++$+++ :To avoid deletion, the article must cite [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and must be encyclopedic, not just a dictionary definition. My personal opinion is that at this time an article on the term will be deleted, because there are not currently sufficient reliable sources, and the term is not currently in sufficiently widespread usage. I don't feel that the source you provided, [http://www.billcasselman.com/new_words/one_shart.htm], is by itself sufficient to establish the term's notability per [[WP:NEO#Articles on neologisms|WP:NEO]]. If you're concerned that an article on this term may be deleted, you can create a draft article in your [[Special:Mypage/Sandbox|personal sandbox]] and work on it with other interested editors. Also bear in mind that as the term gains popularity and more widespread usage, it may at some future point become sufficiently notable to warrant a Wikipedia article. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 05:51, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
283753 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283751 +++$+++ 283751 +++$+++ 2007-10-09 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.191983520E09 +++$+++ I don't recall saying that, can you point me to the relevant discussion? I'll have a look at the deletion debate and leave a note there if I feel I can offer an informed opinion, but please be wary of canvassing; this practice is strongly frowned upon for reasons outlined at [[WP:CANVAS]]. -- +++$+++ :I don't recall saying that, can you point me to the relevant discussion? I'll have a look at the deletion debate and leave a note there if I feel I can offer an informed opinion, but please be wary of canvassing; this practice is strongly frowned upon for reasons outlined at [[WP:CANVAS]]. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 19:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

545896 +++$+++ Calaka +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545896 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-31 02:31:00 +++$+++ 1.243762260E09 +++$+++ Hey, I will need your Admin assistance in relation to the MCB project. When free please look at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Molecular_and_Cellular_Biology#Administrators_needed_for_updating_Talk_page_TAG_MCB|this]]. Hope you can help. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hey, I will need your Admin assistance in relation to the MCB project. When free please look at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Molecular_and_Cellular_Biology#Administrators_needed_for_updating_Talk_page_TAG_MCB|this]]. Hope you can help. Thanks. [[User:Calaka|Calaka]] ([[User talk:Calaka|talk]]) 02:31, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
545897 +++$+++ Calaka +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545896 +++$+++ 545896 +++$+++ 2009-06-09 15:03:00 +++$+++ 1.244584980E09 +++$+++ Please? :)  +++$+++ :Please? :) [[User:Calaka|Calaka]] ([[User talk:Calaka|talk]]) 15:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

21609 +++$+++ UKER +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21609 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-01 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.272769560E09 +++$+++ Hi. May I ask what your source is for Weaving, Adler and Welker being in ''Transformers 3''? Thanks. -- +++$+++ Hi. May I ask what your source is for Weaving, Adler and Welker being in ''Transformers 3''? Thanks. --[[User:UKER|uKER]] ([[User talk:UKER|talk]]) 20:06, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
21610 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21609 +++$+++ 21609 +++$+++ 2010-05-01 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.272769680E09 +++$+++ My only source for those actors come from the official ''Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen'' website. Here's the link: http:\/\/www.transformersmovie.com.  +++$+++ :My only source for those actors come from the official ''Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen'' website. Here's the link: http://www.transformersmovie.com. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 20:08, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
21611 +++$+++ UKER +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21609 +++$+++ 21610 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 07:22:00 +++$+++ 1.272810120E09 +++$+++ You do realize that ''Revenge of the Fallen'' is Transformers 2 and you're editing the [[Transformers 3]] article, don't you? -- +++$+++ ::You do realize that ''Revenge of the Fallen'' is Transformers 2 and you're editing the [[Transformers 3]] article, don't you? --[[User:UKER|uKER]] ([[User talk:UKER|talk]]) 07:22, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
21612 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21609 +++$+++ 21609 +++$+++ 2010-05-02 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.272832980E09 +++$+++ Because the change from Discovery Kids to The Hub won't take place until October 10th. So no relaunch dates in the template for the article.  +++$+++ :Because the change from Discovery Kids to The Hub won't take place until October 10th. So no relaunch dates in the template for the article. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 13:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

283754 +++$+++ Sesshomaru +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283754 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-13 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.192290360E09 +++$+++ I asked a question regarding [[Wikipedia talk:Hatnote#Hatnotes above everything|hatnotes over ''all'' tags]] and thought you could take part in answering it.  +++$+++ I asked a question regarding [[Wikipedia talk:Hatnote#Hatnotes above everything|hatnotes over ''all'' tags]] and thought you could take part in answering it. [[User:Sesshomaru|Lord Sesshomaru]] <small>([[User talk:Sesshomaru|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sesshomaru|edits]])</small> 08:46, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
283755 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283754 +++$+++ 283754 +++$+++ 2007-10-13 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.192317780E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up, I've replied there. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads up, I've replied there. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 16:23, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

283756 +++$+++ Hazel77 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-21 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.193004720E09 +++$+++ Sorry for the accidental revert. I saw you removing the speedy deletion criterion on a page with little content and didn't spend enough time checking the references. My mistake.-- +++$+++ Sorry for the accidental revert. I saw you removing the speedy deletion criterion on a page with little content and didn't spend enough time checking the references. My mistake.--[[User:Hazel77|Hazel77]] 15:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
283757 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283756 +++$+++ 283756 +++$+++ 2007-10-21 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.193004780E09 +++$+++ That's ok, no problem. But please note that that [[WP:CSD#A7|CSD A7]] only applies to articles that contain no indication of importance\/significance whatsoever. If the article contains an assertion of importance, however tenuous, [[WP:PROD|prod]]ding it or listing it at [[WP:AFD]] is a better option. Regards. -- +++$+++ :That's ok, no problem. But please note that that [[WP:CSD#A7|CSD A7]] only applies to articles that contain no indication of importance/significance whatsoever. If the article contains an assertion of importance, however tenuous, [[WP:PROD|prod]]ding it or listing it at [[WP:AFD]] is a better option. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 15:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
283758 +++$+++ Hazel77 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283756 +++$+++ 283757 +++$+++ 2007-10-21 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.193006100E09 +++$+++ Ok, i'll make a point of doing that from now on.-- +++$+++ ::Ok, i'll make a point of doing that from now on.--[[User:Hazel77|Hazel77]] 15:35, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
283759 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283756 +++$+++ 283756 +++$+++ 2007-10-21 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.193021160E09 +++$+++ Hello. The best way to describe a piece without bias is to find [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that describe the piece, and use those sources as a basis for your edits, adding footnotes in the article to reference your source material. I found the Naxos article by Google searching for information on the Turkish Fragments. -- +++$+++ :Hello. The best way to describe a piece without bias is to find [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that describe the piece, and use those sources as a basis for your edits, adding footnotes in the article to reference your source material. I found the Naxos article by Google searching for information on the Turkish Fragments. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 19:46, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
283760 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283756 +++$+++ 283756 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.194678000E09 +++$+++ It's no problem at all. Image related policies on Wikipedia can be complicated even for experienced users.  Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions; I'll try to help or put you in touch with someone who can. Regards. -- +++$+++ :It's no problem at all. Image related policies on Wikipedia can be complicated even for experienced users.  Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions; I'll try to help or put you in touch with someone who can. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 23:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
283761 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283756 +++$+++ 283756 +++$+++ 2007-11-09 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.194678000E09 +++$+++ It's likely that this copyright image will be deleted, because a free image that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose could be created (see [[WP:NFCC#1|Non-free content criteria 1]]). -- +++$+++ :It's likely that this copyright image will be deleted, because a free image that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose could be created (see [[WP:NFCC#1|Non-free content criteria 1]]). --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 23:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

21613 +++$+++ C.Fred +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21613 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-07 15:48:00 +++$+++ 1.273272480E09 +++$+++ As [[Steve Irwin]] was Australian, his article should not be changed out of Australian English. That means date formats and spellings (e.g., ''honour'') should remain as they were before your changes. \u2014''' +++$+++ As [[Steve Irwin]] was Australian, his article should not be changed out of Australian English. That means date formats and spellings (e.g., ''honour'') should remain as they were before your changes. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 15:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
21614 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21613 +++$+++ 21613 +++$+++ 2010-05-18 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.274250180E09 +++$+++ I am not a dick. Don't call me that again.  +++$+++ :I am not a dick. Don't call me that again. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 23:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

283762 +++$+++ Rettetast +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-17 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.195361220E09 +++$+++ Did you take this image?  +++$+++ Did you take this image? [[User:Rettetast|Rette]][[User talk:Rettetast|tast]] 20:47, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
283763 +++$+++ The-Real-ZEUS +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 20:56:00 +++$+++ 1.195361760E09 +++$+++ Yes +++$+++ * Yes[[User:The-real-zeus|The-real-zeus]] ([[User talk:The-real-zeus|talk]]) 20:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
283764 +++$+++ Rettetast +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.195361820E09 +++$+++ So You work for AEK?  +++$+++ :So You work for AEK? [[User:Rettetast|Rette]][[User talk:Rettetast|tast]] 20:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
283765 +++$+++ The-Real-ZEUS +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 283764 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 20:58:00 +++$+++ 1.195361880E09 +++$+++ Umhum... +++$+++ ** Umhum...[[User:The-real-zeus|The-real-zeus]] ([[User talk:The-real-zeus|talk]]) 20:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
283766 +++$+++ Rettetast +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 283764 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.195361940E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/www.aekfc.gr\/media\/aek2007\/photos07_08\/papastathopoulosM.jpg]  +++$+++ ::[http://www.aekfc.gr/media/aek2007/photos07_08/papastathopoulosM.jpg] [[User:Rettetast|Rette]][[User talk:Rettetast|tast]] 20:59, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
283767 +++$+++ The-Real-ZEUS +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 283766 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.195362120E09 +++$+++ Exactly,i work for AEK,took the picture,uploaded them all to aekfc.gr  +++$+++ ***Exactly,i work for AEK,took the picture,uploaded them all to aekfc.gr [[User:The-real-zeus|The-real-zeus]] ([[User talk:The-real-zeus|talk]]) 21:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
283768 +++$+++ Rettetast +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 283766 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 21:06:00 +++$+++ 1.195362360E09 +++$+++ So you wont mind sending an mail from your AEK mailaddress to the OTRS confirming the release or noting on the AEK website that the image is released under CC-BY-2.0 then?  +++$+++ :::So you wont mind sending an mail from your AEK mailaddress to the OTRS confirming the release or noting on the AEK website that the image is released under CC-BY-2.0 then? [[User:Rettetast|Rette]][[User talk:Rettetast|tast]] 21:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
283769 +++$+++ Rettetast +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 283768 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.195362480E09 +++$+++ Do you have an image with better resolution btw.  +++$+++ ::::Do you have an image with better resolution btw. [[User:Rettetast|Rette]][[User talk:Rettetast|tast]] 21:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
283770 +++$+++ The-Real-ZEUS +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 283768 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.195363140E09 +++$+++ Sorry mate i dont have a higher one +++$+++ ****Sorry mate i dont have a higher one[[User:The-real-zeus|The-real-zeus]] ([[User talk:The-real-zeus|talk]]) 21:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
283771 +++$+++ Rettetast +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 283770 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.195363260E09 +++$+++ Thats ok, as long as you verify the copyright as by sending an e-mail, or noting the license on the AEK webpage. That wont be a problem, will it?  +++$+++ :::::Thats ok, as long as you verify the copyright as by sending an e-mail, or noting the license on the AEK webpage. That wont be a problem, will it? [[User:Rettetast|Rette]][[User talk:Rettetast|tast]] 21:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
283772 +++$+++ The-Real-ZEUS +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 283770 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.195363500E09 +++$+++ Ofcourse not... +++$+++ ***** Ofcourse not...[[User:The-real-zeus|The-real-zeus]] ([[User talk:The-real-zeus|talk]]) 21:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
283773 +++$+++ The-Real-ZEUS +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283762 +++$+++ 283772 +++$+++ 2007-11-17 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.195363920E09 +++$+++ You know what i dont like that image anymore,i will get a beter one tommorow,could you delete it for me...cheers..lol... :D  +++$+++ ****** You know what i dont like that image anymore,i will get a beter one tommorow,could you delete it for me...cheers..lol... :D [[User:The-real-zeus|The-real-zeus]] ([[User talk:The-real-zeus|talk]]) 21:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

545908 +++$+++ Judytaylorgold +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545908 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-12 16:55:00 +++$+++ 1.244850900E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Judytaylorgold|Judytaylorgold]] ([[User talk:Judytaylorgold|talk]]) 16:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
545909 +++$+++ David D. +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545908 +++$+++ 545908 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.244851320E09 +++$+++ \"''offensive to the American public''\"?? Hmm, when you use words like that it immediately sends up a red flag.  +++$+++ :"''offensive to the American public''"?? Hmm, when you use words like that it immediately sends up a red flag. [[User:David D.|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.|(Talk)]] 17:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
545910 +++$+++ Looie496 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545908 +++$+++ 545909 +++$+++ 2009-06-12 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.244852220E09 +++$+++ The [http:\/\/jco.ascopubs.org\/cgi\/content\/abstract\/8\/1\/9 abstract] of the paper in question says, ''\"Considering all patients, survival was greater for the hydrazine sulfate compared with placebo group (median survival, 292 v 187 days), but the difference did not achieve statistical significance.\"''  This is consistent with the wording in the article.  Judy Taylor Gold's complaint shows a lack of understanding of the proper way to use statistics in medical studies -- significant differences within subgroups are not meaningful unless there is a significant effect in the overall population.  Further discussion should probably go to the talk page of the article.  (Apologies Tim for intruding on your talk page.)  +++$+++ ::The [http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/9 abstract] of the paper in question says, ''"Considering all patients, survival was greater for the hydrazine sulfate compared with placebo group (median survival, 292 v 187 days), but the difference did not achieve statistical significance."''  This is consistent with the wording in the article.  Judy Taylor Gold's complaint shows a lack of understanding of the proper way to use statistics in medical studies -- significant differences within subgroups are not meaningful unless there is a significant effect in the overall population.  Further discussion should probably go to the talk page of the article.  (Apologies Tim for intruding on your talk page.) [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 17:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

545913 +++$+++ 209.6.238.158 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545913 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-08 05:52:00 +++$+++ 1.244465520E09 +++$+++ Tim: it is the editor sometimes known as Kendrick7. I wanted to say: sorry for insulting you a few weeks back. I tried to get my account unblocked so I could apologize, but, well, you know how the idiocracy works. Apparently giving me a chance to apologize would be unseemly, and as such I've been banned forever. I do, however, wish you would understand the underlying importance of [[WP:PRESERVE]], or what it used to say, to the nature of the project, or at least, that is my prayer. Meh, you probably don't, and are just some editor who thinks we shouldn't be a project which contains all human knowledge, but you never know. Oh well, whatever, time to reboot my modem I guess. -- [[Special:Contributions\/209.6.238.158|209.6.238.158]] ( +++$+++ Tim: it is the editor sometimes known as Kendrick7. I wanted to say: sorry for insulting you a few weeks back. I tried to get my account unblocked so I could apologize, but, well, you know how the idiocracy works. Apparently giving me a chance to apologize would be unseemly, and as such I've been banned forever. I do, however, wish you would understand the underlying importance of [[WP:PRESERVE]], or what it used to say, to the nature of the project, or at least, that is my prayer. Meh, you probably don't, and are just some editor who thinks we shouldn't be a project which contains all human knowledge, but you never know. Oh well, whatever, time to reboot my modem I guess. -- [[Special:Contributions/209.6.238.158|209.6.238.158]] ([[User talk:209.6.238.158|talk]]) 05:52, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
545914 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545913 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-08 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.244503440E09 +++$+++ No hard feelings, in fact I can't actually remember who you are.  +++$+++ ::No hard feelings, in fact I can't actually remember who you are. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 16:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
545915 +++$+++ 209.6.238.158 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545913 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-06-14 05:29:00 +++$+++ 1.244982540E09 +++$+++ Thanks, glad to hear. Of course, I'm banned nevertheless. LOL. That's much of the problem with this place. Full of drama queens who want to create drama where none exists. I was always just trying to write an encyclopedia, or help write rules to enable others to do so. [[Six phases of a big project|No good deed goes unpunished]]. -- [[Special:Contributions\/209.6.238.158|209.6.238.158]] ( +++$+++ :::Thanks, glad to hear. Of course, I'm banned nevertheless. LOL. That's much of the problem with this place. Full of drama queens who want to create drama where none exists. I was always just trying to write an encyclopedia, or help write rules to enable others to do so. [[Six phases of a big project|No good deed goes unpunished]]. -- [[Special:Contributions/209.6.238.158|209.6.238.158]] ([[User talk:209.6.238.158|talk]]) 05:29, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

21629 +++$+++ Bejinhan +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21629 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-19 06:56:00 +++$+++ 1.282226160E09 +++$+++ Hi there, I've been making major edits to that article. At the moment, I want to ref the ratings, share and ranking. May I know where you got the figures? I tried searching for them but couldn't find them. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi there, I've been making major edits to that article. At the moment, I want to ref the ratings, share and ranking. May I know where you got the figures? I tried searching for them but couldn't find them. Cheers, [[User:Bejinhan|<font color="#8000FF">Bejinhan</font>]] [[User talk:Bejinhan|<font color="#FF00FF">talks</font>]]  06:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
21630 +++$+++ Bejinhan +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21629 +++$+++ 21629 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.282299480E09 +++$+++ Hello?  +++$+++ :Hello? [[User:Bejinhan|<font color="#8000FF">Bejinhan</font>]] [[User talk:Bejinhan|<font color="#FF00FF">talks</font>]]  03:18, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
21631 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21629 +++$+++ 21630 +++$+++ 2010-08-20 13:02:00 +++$+++ 1.282334520E09 +++$+++ I got those figures from the website ''TV By the Numbers''.  +++$+++ ::I got those figures from the website ''TV By the Numbers''. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 13:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
21632 +++$+++ Bejinhan +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21629 +++$+++ 21631 +++$+++ 2010-08-21 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.282393440E09 +++$+++ Thanks  +++$+++ :::Thanks [[User:Bejinhan|<font color="#8000FF">Bejinhan</font>]] [[User talk:Bejinhan|<font color="#FF00FF">talks</font>]]  05:24, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
21633 +++$+++ Bejinhan +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21629 +++$+++ 21632 +++$+++ 2010-08-23 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.282584120E09 +++$+++ Sorry to disturb you, but another quick question, what was Jason Carpenter's(played by [[Dave Giuntoli]]  character role?  +++$+++ ::::Sorry to disturb you, but another quick question, what was Jason Carpenter's(played by [[Dave Giuntoli]]  character role? [[User:Bejinhan|<font color="#8000FF">Bejinhan</font>]] [[User talk:Bejinhan|<font color="#FF00FF">talks</font>]]  10:22, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
21634 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21629 +++$+++ 21633 +++$+++ 2010-08-23 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.282615800E09 +++$+++ I do not know.  +++$+++ :::::I do not know. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 19:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

283774 +++$+++ Rettetast +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-17 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.195365240E09 +++$+++ Since this image probably is a blatant copyvio, I think his earlier uploads also are copyvios. Whats your thoughts about this. Any suggestions on what to do?  +++$+++ Since this image probably is a blatant copyvio, I think his earlier uploads also are copyvios. Whats your thoughts about this. Any suggestions on what to do? [[User:Rettetast|Rette]][[User talk:Rettetast|tast]] 21:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
283775 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283774 +++$+++ 283774 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.195389360E09 +++$+++ Hi, I agree with you that the explanations offered at the prior WP:PUI debate are questionable in light of the dubious nature of his recent explanations to you. Unfortunately, the editor who okayed his images at the prior WP:PUI debate is currently on Wikibreak so it's not possible to consult with him. Other options include relisting the questionable images at WP:PUI, making a note at [[WP:AN]], or getting an admin with experience in image-related areas to review the case. Could you conduct this review yourself? I'm not sure about appropriate etiquette or process in this regard. Regards and good luck getting this issue resolved. -- +++$+++ :Hi, I agree with you that the explanations offered at the prior WP:PUI debate are questionable in light of the dubious nature of his recent explanations to you. Unfortunately, the editor who okayed his images at the prior WP:PUI debate is currently on Wikibreak so it's not possible to consult with him. Other options include relisting the questionable images at WP:PUI, making a note at [[WP:AN]], or getting an admin with experience in image-related areas to review the case. Could you conduct this review yourself? I'm not sure about appropriate etiquette or process in this regard. Regards and good luck getting this issue resolved. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness|talk]]) 04:36, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
283776 +++$+++ Rettetast +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283774 +++$+++ 283775 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.195439340E09 +++$+++ Nominated for deletion at [[Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion\/2007_November_18#Image:Papastathopoulos-2007.jpg]]. I hav also nominated other images where he has claimed copyright.  +++$+++ ::Nominated for deletion at [[Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_November_18#Image:Papastathopoulos-2007.jpg]]. I hav also nominated other images where he has claimed copyright. [[User:Rettetast|Rette]][[User talk:Rettetast|tast]] 18:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
283777 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283774 +++$+++ 283774 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.195384980E09 +++$+++ Hello. The images you uploaded were deleted from Wikipedia because they had an unknown copyright status. When you upload an image to Wikipedia, you must include on the [[Wikipedia:Image description page|description page]] the image's source and an [[WP:ICT|image copyright tag]]. If the image is not usable under a free license, you must also include a [[WP:FURG|fair use rationale]] on the description page. If an image is lacking this information, it will be deleted from Wikipedia. See [[WP:IUP]] for more info. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hello. The images you uploaded were deleted from Wikipedia because they had an unknown copyright status. When you upload an image to Wikipedia, you must include on the [[Wikipedia:Image description page|description page]] the image's source and an [[WP:ICT|image copyright tag]]. If the image is not usable under a free license, you must also include a [[WP:FURG|fair use rationale]] on the description page. If an image is lacking this information, it will be deleted from Wikipedia. See [[WP:IUP]] for more info. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness|talk]]) 03:23, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

611753 +++$+++ Seadog.M.S +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611753 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-21 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.166750880E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Well good job at reverting vandalism lately. Keep it up. &mdash; <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Well good job at reverting vandalism lately. Keep it up. &mdash; <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Seadog.M.S|<font color="royalblue">'''Seadog_MS''']] 17:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
611754 +++$+++ Seadog.M.S +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611753 +++$+++ 611753 +++$+++ 2006-12-21 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.166751840E09 +++$+++ Hey I signed your book, I too look forward to working with you in the near future. Also thanks for the Christmas wish :) &mdash; <span style=\"font-family: Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Hey I signed your book, I too look forward to working with you in the near future. Also thanks for the Christmas wish :) &mdash; <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Seadog.M.S|<font color="royalblue">'''Seadog_MS''']] 17:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

283778 +++$+++ LV1212 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283778 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-21 15:13:00 +++$+++ 1.195686780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:LV1212|LV1212]] ([[User talk:LV1212|talk]]) 15:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
283779 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283778 +++$+++ 283778 +++$+++ 2007-11-21 15:29:00 +++$+++ 1.195687740E09 +++$+++ Hi. Images uploaded to the English Wikipedia must conform to the English Wikipedia's [[WP:IUP|image use policy]]. On the English Wikipedia, an image's description page must specify the image's source (which [[:Image:Joseph Cowles.jpg]] already does), and include an appropriate [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#List of image copyright tags|copyright tag]]. Additionally, if the image is not available for use under a free content license, it must also include a [[WP:FURG|fair use rationale]]. Another thing to bear in mind is that if the image could reasonably be replaced by a free image (for instance, if it's a photo of a living person), we can't use it on the English Wikipedia. I hope this helps to clarify matters; please feel free to contact me if you need further assistance. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hi. Images uploaded to the English Wikipedia must conform to the English Wikipedia's [[WP:IUP|image use policy]]. On the English Wikipedia, an image's description page must specify the image's source (which [[:Image:Joseph Cowles.jpg]] already does), and include an appropriate [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#List of image copyright tags|copyright tag]]. Additionally, if the image is not available for use under a free content license, it must also include a [[WP:FURG|fair use rationale]]. Another thing to bear in mind is that if the image could reasonably be replaced by a free image (for instance, if it's a photo of a living person), we can't use it on the English Wikipedia. I hope this helps to clarify matters; please feel free to contact me if you need further assistance. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness|talk]]) 15:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
283780 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283778 +++$+++ 283778 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.196077020E09 +++$+++ Hi, I'm just going by my interpretation of the [[WP:WEB]] content guideline, which states that web-based content must either: a) have been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself, b) have won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization, or c) be distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators. I don't feel the above-mentioned website meets these criteria. I have listed it at AFD, so we can determine whether the site satisfies content guidelines; please join the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Subject:CINEMA]]. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hi, I'm just going by my interpretation of the [[WP:WEB]] content guideline, which states that web-based content must either: a) have been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself, b) have won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization, or c) be distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators. I don't feel the above-mentioned website meets these criteria. I have listed it at AFD, so we can determine whether the site satisfies content guidelines; please join the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subject:CINEMA]]. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness|talk]]) 03:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

484203 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484203 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-24 19:16:00 +++$+++ 1.201230960E09 +++$+++ Vandalizing even as I was trying to revert him. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/Sourbeer55]  +++$+++ Vandalizing even as I was trying to revert him. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sourbeer55] [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 19:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
484204 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484203 +++$+++ 484203 +++$+++ 2008-01-24 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.201231020E09 +++$+++ He was already warned, a few days ago.  +++$+++ :He was already warned, a few days ago. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 19:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

283781 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283781 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-26 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.196135940E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 19:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
283782 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283781 +++$+++ 283781 +++$+++ 2007-11-27 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.196153340E09 +++$+++ This image was tagged because the image description page linked to the article via a redirect. The problem has been fixed. -- +++$+++ :This image was tagged because the image description page linked to the article via a redirect. The problem has been fixed. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness|talk]]) 00:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

21638 +++$+++ Readopedia +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21638 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-19 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.284958500E09 +++$+++ Hi, about the date The CW4Kids changed to Toonzai, I think it's August 14, 2010 that this happened. I saw no differences in the logo on September 18, so how is it in preview form from August 14 to September 11? Also, I think the name of the page should be Toonzai (without an exclamation point) because that is nowhere in the logo. About the talk page message, don't make the heading so long, and there is no need for two of them. Even though it was about two articles, we're dealing with the same thing.  +++$+++ Hi, about the date The CW4Kids changed to Toonzai, I think it's August 14, 2010 that this happened. I saw no differences in the logo on September 18, so how is it in preview form from August 14 to September 11? Also, I think the name of the page should be Toonzai (without an exclamation point) because that is nowhere in the logo. About the talk page message, don't make the heading so long, and there is no need for two of them. Even though it was about two articles, we're dealing with the same thing. [[User:Readopedia|Readopedia]] ([[User talk:Readopedia#top|talk]]) 21:55, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
21639 +++$+++ Readopedia +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21638 +++$+++ 21638 +++$+++ 2010-09-19 22:07:00 +++$+++ 1.284959220E09 +++$+++ This is not vandalism, by the way. I do think that maybe I should have messaged you before I changed that, but I had no intention of vandalizing the page. I just don't think anything changed on September 18 that wasn't there on August 14.  +++$+++ :This is not vandalism, by the way. I do think that maybe I should have messaged you before I changed that, but I had no intention of vandalizing the page. I just don't think anything changed on September 18 that wasn't there on August 14. [[User:Readopedia|Readopedia]] ([[User talk:Readopedia#top|talk]]) 22:07, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

283784 +++$+++ Deb +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283784 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-11 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.202796180E09 +++$+++ A [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] template has been added to the article [[Changeling (Eberron)]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion|criteria for inclusion]], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also \"[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]\" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]).  You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}<\/code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Changeling (Eberron)|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add <code>{{tl|db-author}}<\/code> to the top of [[Changeling (Eberron)]]. <!-- Template:PRODWarning -->  +++$+++ A [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] template has been added to the article [[Changeling (Eberron)]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion|criteria for inclusion]], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]).  You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Changeling (Eberron)|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add <code>{{tl|db-author}}</code> to the top of [[Changeling (Eberron)]]. <!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb|talk]]) 22:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
283785 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283784 +++$+++ 283784 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.202898900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the notice. I expanded this article back in 2005, before I was fully cognizant of Wikipedia's notability guidelines regarding fictional content. It should probably be deleted. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the notice. I expanded this article back in 2005, before I was fully cognizant of Wikipedia's notability guidelines regarding fictional content. It should probably be deleted. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 02:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

21641 +++$+++ Muhandes +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21641 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-25 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.285460880E09 +++$+++ Hi there. Could you please enlighten me on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=WWE_NXT&action=historysubmit&diff=386811559&oldid=386641828 this edit]? You left no edit summary so I am left in the dark as to why you reinstated a flagicon which seems to me to be clearly against [[MOS:FLAG]]. Is there some special rule here I am missing? -- +++$+++ Hi there. Could you please enlighten me on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WWE_NXT&action=historysubmit&diff=386811559&oldid=386641828 this edit]? You left no edit summary so I am left in the dark as to why you reinstated a flagicon which seems to me to be clearly against [[MOS:FLAG]]. Is there some special rule here I am missing? --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]) 17:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
21642 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21641 +++$+++ 21641 +++$+++ 2010-09-25 17:32:00 +++$+++ 1.285461120E09 +++$+++ The reason why I reinstated a flagicon is because I like having a flagicon on the [[WWE NXT]] page.  +++$+++ : The reason why I reinstated a flagicon is because I like having a flagicon on the [[WWE NXT]] page. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 17:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

283786 +++$+++ Sarah777 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 02:28:00 +++$+++ 1.202898480E09 +++$+++ This article has already been moved without any such request. Put it back where it was please.  +++$+++ This article has already been moved without any such request. Put it back where it was please. [[User:Sarah777|Sarah777]] ([[User talk:Sarah777|talk]]) 02:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
283787 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283786 +++$+++ 283786 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 02:34:00 +++$+++ 1.202898840E09 +++$+++ Hello. Unfortunately I can't move it back because I'm not an admin, and in any case I'm not convinced it shouldn't be the primary topic. In my opinion, your best course of action is to contact the admin who made the move ([[User:Haemo|Haemo]]), file a move request, and\/or start a discussion about whether the music style should be the primary topic on the article's talk page. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hello. Unfortunately I can't move it back because I'm not an admin, and in any case I'm not convinced it shouldn't be the primary topic. In my opinion, your best course of action is to contact the admin who made the move ([[User:Haemo|Haemo]]), file a move request, and/or start a discussion about whether the music style should be the primary topic on the article's talk page. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 02:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

396823 +++$+++ Goat-see +++$+++ Mkweise +++$+++ 396823 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-04-05 21:40:00 +++$+++ 1.081226400E09 +++$+++ [[Gay Nigger Association of America]] is being censored by [[user:Adam_Bishop|Adam Bishop]], but the old version cannot be recovered because the page is protected. Do us Gay Niggers a favor and revert it please :)  +++$+++ [[Gay Nigger Association of America]] is being censored by [[user:Adam_Bishop|Adam Bishop]], but the old version cannot be recovered because the page is protected. Do us Gay Niggers a favor and revert it please :) [[User:Goat-see|Goat-see]] 21:40, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
396824 +++$+++ Mkweise +++$+++ Mkweise +++$+++ 396823 +++$+++ 396823 +++$+++ 2004-04-05 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.081227120E09 +++$+++ Sorry, your article has been deleted because it was deemed to be self-promotion\/vanity. Try adding a section about your organization at [[Slashdot trolling phenomena]], I don't think there'd be any strong objection to having it covered there. Just be sure to avoid any phrasing that could be construed as promotion, or someone is sure to come along and remove the whole section again.  +++$+++ :Sorry, your article has been deleted because it was deemed to be self-promotion/vanity. Try adding a section about your organization at [[Slashdot trolling phenomena]], I don't think there'd be any strong objection to having it covered there. Just be sure to avoid any phrasing that could be construed as promotion, or someone is sure to come along and remove the whole section again. [[User:Mkweise|Mkweise]] 21:52, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)

283788 +++$+++ Rudric +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-13 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.202906160E09 +++$+++ Thank you noticing. Proper copyright and author information on due. I mishandled the uploas as wasn't very familiar with the upload process.  +++$+++ Thank you noticing. Proper copyright and author information on due. I mishandled the uploas as wasn't very familiar with the upload process. [[User:Rudric|Rudric]] ([[User talk:Rudric|talk]]) 04:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
283789 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283788 +++$+++ 283788 +++$+++ 2008-02-13 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.202907900E09 +++$+++ No problem, thank you. -- +++$+++ :No problem, thank you. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 05:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

21645 +++$+++ Gtabigfan2010 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21645 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-30 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.285904520E09 +++$+++ I watched the Clash of the Titans movie, [[Sam Worthington]] as [[Perseus]], perhaps I want [[Linda Cardellini]] as [[Andromeda]], so who's played as Andromeda? -- +++$+++ I watched the Clash of the Titans movie, [[Sam Worthington]] as [[Perseus]], perhaps I want [[Linda Cardellini]] as [[Andromeda]], so who's played as Andromeda? --[[User:Gtabigfan2010|Gtabigfan2010]] ([[User talk:Gtabigfan2010|talk]]) 20:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
21646 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21645 +++$+++ 21645 +++$+++ 2010-09-30 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.285904580E09 +++$+++ [[Alexa Davalos]], that's who.  +++$+++ : [[Alexa Davalos]], that's who. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 20:43, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
21647 +++$+++ Gtabigfan2010 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21645 +++$+++ 21645 +++$+++ 2010-10-01 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.285970280E09 +++$+++ The film director chosen Alexa Davalos to portray as Andromeda in 2010 film of Clash of the Titans, but in the next series of Clash of the Titans, I want Linda Cardellini portray as Andromeda. -- +++$+++ :The film director chosen Alexa Davalos to portray as Andromeda in 2010 film of Clash of the Titans, but in the next series of Clash of the Titans, I want Linda Cardellini portray as Andromeda. --[[User:Gtabigfan2010|Gtabigfan2010]] ([[User talk:Gtabigfan2010|talk]]) 14:58, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

283790 +++$+++ Uga Man +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283790 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-19 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.203487680E09 +++$+++ I really am sorry about that. It was an honest mistake. Next time I'll be more careful when I upload images. --[[User:Uga Man|Uga Man]] ([[User talk:Uga Man|talk]]) <font color = \"red\"><small>  +++$+++ I really am sorry about that. It was an honest mistake. Next time I'll be more careful when I upload images. --[[User:Uga Man|Uga Man]] ([[User talk:Uga Man|talk]]) <font color = "red"><small> [[User:Uga Man/presidential campaign, 2008|UGA MAN FOR PRESIDENT 2008]] </small></font> 22:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
283791 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283790 +++$+++ 283790 +++$+++ 2008-02-20 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.203562020E09 +++$+++ It's really no problem, thank you. -- +++$+++ :It's really no problem, thank you. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 18:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
283792 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283790 +++$+++ 283790 +++$+++ 2008-02-24 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.203860580E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the heads-up, I've replied there. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the heads-up, I've replied there. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 05:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

283793 +++$+++ SeanyakaRalphy +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283793 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-25 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.203993480E09 +++$+++ -  +++$+++ - [[User:SeanyakaRalphy|SeanyakaRalphy]] ([[User talk:SeanyakaRalphy|talk]]) 18:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
283794 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283793 +++$+++ 283793 +++$+++ 2008-02-25 18:45:00 +++$+++ 1.203993900E09 +++$+++ No problem, and apologies for my earlier misunderstanding. Can you please forward confirmation of your permission to the e-mail address \"'''permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org'''\", so that a record of the images' status can be archived? See [[Wikipedia:Permission#When permission is confirmed]] for further info. Thanks and regards. -- +++$+++ :No problem, and apologies for my earlier misunderstanding. Can you please forward confirmation of your permission to the e-mail address "'''permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org'''", so that a record of the images' status can be archived? See [[Wikipedia:Permission#When permission is confirmed]] for further info. Thanks and regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 18:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
283795 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283793 +++$+++ 283793 +++$+++ 2008-02-28 07:11:00 +++$+++ 1.204211460E09 +++$+++ Sure, no problem. Can you tell me the address of the websites you got the images from? -- +++$+++ :Sure, no problem. Can you tell me the address of the websites you got the images from? --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 07:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

21650 +++$+++ Mr.Television +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21650 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-01 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.285970040E09 +++$+++ Could you please explain why you would revert my repair work to the episode tables in the [[Tutenstein]] article, as you would of known, the airdates tab was broken and clearly seemed messy, that's why I fixed it.  +++$+++ Could you please explain why you would revert my repair work to the episode tables in the [[Tutenstein]] article, as you would of known, the airdates tab was broken and clearly seemed messy, that's why I fixed it. [[User:Mr.Television|Mr.Television]] ([[User talk:Mr.Television|talk]]) 14:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
21651 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21650 +++$+++ 21650 +++$+++ 2010-10-01 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.285970100E09 +++$+++ I was only trying to repair the Hub category from being broken.  +++$+++ : I was only trying to repair the Hub category from being broken. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 14:55, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
21652 +++$+++ QuasyBoy +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21650 +++$+++ 21651 +++$+++ 2010-10-01 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.285981560E09 +++$+++ Alright then, have a nice day. [[User:Mr.Television|Mr.Television]] ([[User talk:Mr.Television|talk]]) 1''During the day, the rebranded ''During the day, the rebranded channel will air programming for children ages 6-12, drawing largely on the libraries of both parent companies. This programming will air from 6:00AM through 8:00PM eastern time. There will also be a daytime block, called HubBub, aimed at preschoolers[7]. The Hub will feature sitcoms and dramas aimed at families and adults from 8:00PM through 6:00AM eastern time.''\"#FF0800\"> +++$+++ :: Alright then, have a nice day. [[User:Mr.Television|Mr.Television]] ([[User talk:Mr.Television|talk]]) 1''During the day, the rebranded ''During the day, the rebranded channel will air programming for children ages 6-12, drawing largely on the libraries of both parent companies. This programming will air from 6:00AM through 8:00PM eastern time. There will also be a daytime block, called HubBub, aimed at preschoolers[7]. The Hub will feature sitcoms and dramas aimed at families and adults from 8:00PM through 6:00AM eastern time.''"#FF0800">[[User:QuasyBoy|Quasy]]</font><font color="#014421">[[User talk:QuasyBoy|Boy]]</font>''' 18:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

283796 +++$+++ Asenine +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283796 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-01 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.204402320E09 +++$+++ Thankyou very much for the information. I will revert my edits regarding this matter.  +++$+++ Thankyou very much for the information. I will revert my edits regarding this matter. [[User:Asenine|αѕєηιηє]] <sup>[[User talk:Asenine|t]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Asenine|c]]</sub> 12:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
283797 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283796 +++$+++ 283796 +++$+++ 2008-03-01 12:21:00 +++$+++ 1.204402860E09 +++$+++ No problem, just wanted to let you know about the on-going discussion. -- +++$+++ :No problem, just wanted to let you know about the on-going discussion. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 12:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

21654 +++$+++ CoconutHead65 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21654 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-10-12 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.286927940E09 +++$+++ In the WCUU-CA article, it stated the [[The U Too]] will be shown on the [[WCIU-TV]] subchannels 26.5 and 26.6 - and also on analog channel 48. But since an analog signal cannot accommodate the full schedules of both services, it is expected that The U Too will completely displace Me Too from analog channel 48.  +++$+++ In the WCUU-CA article, it stated the [[The U Too]] will be shown on the [[WCIU-TV]] subchannels 26.5 and 26.6 - and also on analog channel 48. But since an analog signal cannot accommodate the full schedules of both services, it is expected that The U Too will completely displace Me Too from analog channel 48. [[User:CoconutHead65|CoconutHead65]] ([[User talk:CoconutHead65|talk]]) 16:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
21655 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21654 +++$+++ 21654 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.286929620E09 +++$+++ Well, then, where do you suppose Me Too will go? What new channel in Chicago will it be shown on?  +++$+++ : Well, then, where do you suppose Me Too will go? What new channel in Chicago will it be shown on? [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 17:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
21656 +++$+++ CoconutHead65 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21654 +++$+++ 21655 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.286933640E09 +++$+++ Me Too will continue to be shown on WCIU's digital subchannel 26.3.  +++$+++ :: Me Too will continue to be shown on WCIU's digital subchannel 26.3. [[User:CoconutHead65|CoconutHead65]] ([[User talk:CoconutHead65|talk]]) 18:34, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
21657 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21654 +++$+++ 21656 +++$+++ 2010-10-12 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.286945220E09 +++$+++ Do you have any idea which new channel [[AT&T U-verse]] will move Me Too to sometime in early December? Presently, it's on AT&T U-verse channel 48.  +++$+++ ::: Do you have any idea which new channel [[AT&T U-verse]] will move Me Too to sometime in early December? Presently, it's on AT&T U-verse channel 48. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 21:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
21658 +++$+++ CoconutHead65 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21654 +++$+++ 21657 +++$+++ 2010-11-03 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.288845000E09 +++$+++ A slight correction to TvtonightOKC's response: [[MeTV]] is currently digital-only, on WCIU-DT2 (23.1\/26.2) and on WWME-LD (23.2). The analog Channel 23 signal, [[WWME-CA]], is currently carrying a simulcast of The U (WCIU-TV's main channel).  +++$+++ ::::A slight correction to TvtonightOKC's response: [[MeTV]] is currently digital-only, on WCIU-DT2 (23.1/26.2) and on WWME-LD (23.2). The analog Channel 23 signal, [[WWME-CA]], is currently carrying a simulcast of The U (WCIU-TV's main channel). [[User:CoconutHead65|CoconutHead65]] ([[User talk:CoconutHead65|talk]]) 21:30, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

545944 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545944 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-30 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.246409520E09 +++$+++ Re: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAvathaar&diff=299543705&oldid=299542443], I don't think I could explain the problem in plain language without being sitebanned. :) ''' +++$+++ Re: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAvathaar&diff=299543705&oldid=299542443], I don't think I could explain the problem in plain language without being sitebanned. :) '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 17:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
545945 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545944 +++$+++ 545944 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.246409580E09 +++$+++ I'm suffering from [[WP:TLDR]] with that discussion.  +++$+++ :I'm suffering from [[WP:TLDR]] with that discussion. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 17:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
545946 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545944 +++$+++ 545945 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 18:48:00 +++$+++ 1.246412880E09 +++$+++ I think [[WP:SOUP|someone may have spat in your soup]]. ''' +++$+++ ::I think [[WP:SOUP|someone may have spat in your soup]]. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 18:48, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
545947 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545944 +++$+++ 545946 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.246413180E09 +++$+++ It is very odd, I think I'll file the whole situation under \"ignore\" unless it starts to impact an article.  +++$+++ :::It is very odd, I think I'll file the whole situation under "ignore" unless it starts to impact an article. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 18:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
545948 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545944 +++$+++ 545947 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.246419360E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that's the way to go. ''' +++$+++ ::::Yeah, that's the way to go. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 20:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

484207 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484207 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-27 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.201431240E09 +++$+++ Is this sufficiently notable for an article of its own? Do we have articles on sections of St. Pete?? Lived in Pinellas for 30+ years and never heard of it. Cheers,  +++$+++ Is this sufficiently notable for an article of its own? Do we have articles on sections of St. Pete?? Lived in Pinellas for 30+ years and never heard of it. Cheers, [[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500">  Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 02:54, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
484208 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484207 +++$+++ 484207 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 03:19:00 +++$+++ 1.201432740E09 +++$+++ Doesn't appear to be.  Unless you can find reliable sources to verify, it looks like a good candidate for [[WP:AFD]].  Has the standard SPA author earmark as well.  \u2014 +++$+++ :Doesn't appear to be.  Unless you can find reliable sources to verify, it looks like a good candidate for [[WP:AFD]].  Has the standard SPA author earmark as well.  —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 03:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
484209 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484207 +++$+++ 484208 +++$+++ 2008-01-27 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.201476180E09 +++$+++ Too true. Will probably AFD the thing, Thanks.  +++$+++ ::Too true. Will probably AFD the thing, Thanks. [[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500">  Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 15:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

527898 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-06 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.183775820E09 +++$+++ It seems to me that the award mentioned is a claim of significance, so i have removed the speedy delete tag.  +++$+++ It seems to me that the award mentioned is a claim of significance, so i have removed the speedy delete tag. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 19:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
527899 +++$+++ DESiegel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527898 +++$+++ 527898 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.183794360E09 +++$+++ You are welcome. Someone else might have a different view, and what an AfD would do is a different matter altogether.  +++$+++ :You are welcome. Someone else might have a different view, and what an AfD would do is a different matter altogether. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 00:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

545952 +++$+++ Dr. Blofeld +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545952 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-01 16:41:00 +++$+++ 1.246491660E09 +++$+++ Yes in google books it seemed that most of them appeared to be Polish\/Russian or from the fromer Soviet bloc countries. Still a legit article but if somebody writes an article on tuberculosis research someday then they should be merged. Phew don't know how hot it is where you are but it is 31 degrees celsius here! +++$+++ Yes in google books it seemed that most of them appeared to be Polish/Russian or from the fromer Soviet bloc countries. Still a legit article but if somebody writes an article on tuberculosis research someday then they should be merged. Phew don't know how hot it is where you are but it is 31 degrees celsius here![[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 16:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
545953 +++$+++ Proteins +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545952 +++$+++ 545952 +++$+++ 2009-07-01 21:03:00 +++$+++ 1.246507380E09 +++$+++ That's a good catch, Dr. Blofeld!  But please allow me to raise a question of whether this material might not be better placed under another article.  Judging from its Greek roots, [[phthisiatry]] should refer to the [[tuberculosis treatment|treatment of tuberculosis]] (for which Wikipedia already has an article), not to the study of tuberculosis, which would be phthisiology.  The Oxford English Dictionary supports this reading of the Greek, and indeed has no entry for phthisiatry.  Perhaps phthisiatry is the word used in slavic languages and not in English?  The brevity of the article also suggests that it might be better as a section or subsection, or as an entry on Wiktionary.  What are your thoughts?   +++$+++ :That's a good catch, Dr. Blofeld!  But please allow me to raise a question of whether this material might not be better placed under another article.  Judging from its Greek roots, [[phthisiatry]] should refer to the [[tuberculosis treatment|treatment of tuberculosis]] (for which Wikipedia already has an article), not to the study of tuberculosis, which would be phthisiology.  The Oxford English Dictionary supports this reading of the Greek, and indeed has no entry for phthisiatry.  Perhaps phthisiatry is the word used in slavic languages and not in English?  The brevity of the article also suggests that it might be better as a section or subsection, or as an entry on Wiktionary.  What are your thoughts?  [[User:Proteins|Proteins]] 21:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

615280 +++$+++ Sannse +++$+++ Plato +++$+++ 615280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-01-20 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.106250000E09 +++$+++ Hi Nick - this isn't urgent, but before you use your sig anywhere, please correct the HTML.  You have a couple of open tags that are affecting the rest of the page now (due to something that used to fix it automatically being turned off).  Please add \/font tags to stop the colours from running onto the rest of the page.  Thanks --  +++$+++ Hi Nick - this isn't urgent, but before you use your sig anywhere, please correct the HTML.  You have a couple of open tags that are affecting the rest of the page now (due to something that used to fix it automatically being turned off).  Please add /font tags to stop the colours from running onto the rest of the page.  Thanks -- [[User:Sannse|sannse]] [[User talk:Sannse|(talk)]] 11:40, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
615281 +++$+++  plato +++$+++ Plato +++$+++ 615280 +++$+++ 615280 +++$+++ 2005-01-22 10:37:00 +++$+++ 1.106419020E09 +++$+++ Fixed (I hope)-- +++$+++ :Fixed (I hope)--[[User:Plato|Comrade Nick]] [[User talk: plato|</small><font color=red><small>@</small></font><font color=green>)---^--</font>]] 10:37, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
615282 +++$+++ John Gohde +++$+++ Plato +++$+++ 615280 +++$+++ 615280 +++$+++ 2005-02-16 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.108594440E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ :-- [[User:John Gohde|John Gohde]] 14:54, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

21666 +++$+++ DKqwerty +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21666 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-11 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.289523780E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions\/AdamDeanHall|your contributions]] to [[Wikipedia:About|Wikipedia]]. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]&#32;for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-editsummary -->  +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/AdamDeanHall|your contributions]] to [[Wikipedia:About|Wikipedia]]. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]&#32;for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> [[User:DKqwerty|DKqwerty]] ([[User talk:DKqwerty|talk]]) 17:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
21667 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21666 +++$+++ 21666 +++$+++ 2010-11-11 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.289533680E09 +++$+++ I thought Multi-camera looked better.  Even for all the ''[[World Wrestling Entertainment]]'' shows.  +++$+++ : I thought Multi-camera looked better.  Even for all the ''[[World Wrestling Entertainment]]'' shows. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 19:48, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

283812 +++$+++ Seminarist +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283812 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-19 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.208589180E09 +++$+++ Hi, I want to query you on moving the RfC on Cebactokpatop. Since the page was created by [[User:Allyne|Allyne]], who wants an RfC on Cebactokpatop, and I signified my agreement and added to the page, it seems clear that the two-person threshhold has been met?  +++$+++ Hi, I want to query you on moving the RfC on Cebactokpatop. Since the page was created by [[User:Allyne|Allyne]], who wants an RfC on Cebactokpatop, and I signified my agreement and added to the page, it seems clear that the two-person threshhold has been met? [[User:Seminarist|Seminarist]] ([[User talk:Seminarist|talk]]) 00:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
283813 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283812 +++$+++ 283812 +++$+++ 2008-04-19 01:03:00 +++$+++ 1.208592180E09 +++$+++ Hi, please ensure the certifiers add their sigs to the [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/Cebactokpatop#Users certifying the basis for this dispute|Users certifying the basis for this dispute]] subsection, and feel free to move the RfC to the approved section at [[WP:RFCC]]. Thanks and regards. -- +++$+++ :Hi, please ensure the certifiers add their sigs to the [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Cebactokpatop#Users certifying the basis for this dispute|Users certifying the basis for this dispute]] subsection, and feel free to move the RfC to the approved section at [[WP:RFCC]]. Thanks and regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 01:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

21670 +++$+++ A. B. +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21670 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-15 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.289886060E09 +++$+++ Thanks, --<font face=\"Futura\"> +++$+++ Thanks, --<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] <sup>([[User talk:A. B.|talk]] •  [[Special:Contributions/A. B.|contribs]])</sup> </font> 21:41, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
21671 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21670 +++$+++ 21670 +++$+++ 2010-11-15 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.289886180E09 +++$+++ Here's some of the specific edits I am reporting as vandalism: [[List of programs broadcast by The Hub]] and [[Transformers: Prime]].  +++$+++ :Here's some of the specific edits I am reporting as vandalism: [[List of programs broadcast by The Hub]] and [[Transformers: Prime]]. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 21:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
21672 +++$+++ A. B. +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21670 +++$+++ 21671 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.289904900E09 +++$+++ --<font face=\"Futura\"> +++$+++ ::--<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] <sup>([[User talk:A. B.|talk]] •  [[Special:Contributions/A. B.|contribs]])</sup> </font> 02:55, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
21673 +++$+++ A. B. +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21670 +++$+++ 21672 +++$+++ 2010-11-16 03:24:00 +++$+++ 1.289906640E09 +++$+++ --<font face=\"Futura\"> +++$+++ :::--<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] <sup>([[User talk:A. B.|talk]] •  [[Special:Contributions/A. B.|contribs]])</sup> </font> 03:24, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

283816 +++$+++ J Milburn +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283816 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-11 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.213226940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know- I've given him a final warning, and I am just going on new image patrol now, so if I see any of his...  +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know- I've given him a final warning, and I am just going on new image patrol now, so if I see any of his... [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 16:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
283817 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283816 +++$+++ 283816 +++$+++ 2008-06-11 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.213228920E09 +++$+++ No problem, thanks for your attention to this matter. -- +++$+++ :No problem, thanks for your attention to this matter. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 17:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
283818 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283816 +++$+++ 283816 +++$+++ 2008-06-25 18:01:00 +++$+++ 1.214442060E09 +++$+++ No problem, I'll keep an eye on it. -- +++$+++ :No problem, I'll keep an eye on it. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 18:01, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

21674 +++$+++ Alan_Liefting +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21674 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-19 22:39:00 +++$+++ 1.290235140E09 +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of [[:Assassins (Desperate Housewives)|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or \"db\", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Assassins (Desperate Housewives)|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these administrators]] to request that the administrator [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> --  +++$+++ If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of [[:Assassins (Desperate Housewives)|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:Assassins (Desperate Housewives)|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these administrators]] to request that the administrator [[Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content|userfy]] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> -- [[User:Alan Liefting|Alan Liefting]] ([[User_talk:Alan_Liefting|talk]]) - 22:39, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
21675 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21674 +++$+++ 21674 +++$+++ 2010-12-13 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.292301060E09 +++$+++ Don't you dare call me a dickhead. Don't you dare!  +++$+++ : Don't you dare call me a dickhead. Don't you dare! [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 20:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

283820 +++$+++ Summerman +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283820 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-26 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.214542740E09 +++$+++ Hi Muchness! Added other references and links today to improve elements of notability about this comic work. Think this article is quite complete so I removed the message as I was afraid to loose the text. Please leave me messages in talk in case you disagree. Thank you -- +++$+++ Hi Muchness! Added other references and links today to improve elements of notability about this comic work. Think this article is quite complete so I removed the message as I was afraid to loose the text. Please leave me messages in talk in case you disagree. Thank you --[[User:Summerman|Summerman]] ([[User talk:Summerman|talk]]) 21:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
283821 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283820 +++$+++ 283820 +++$+++ 2008-06-27 17:28:00 +++$+++ 1.214612880E09 +++$+++ ''(Answered on article's talk page).'' -- +++$+++ :''(Answered on article's talk page).'' --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 17:28, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
283822 +++$+++ Summerman +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283820 +++$+++ 283820 +++$+++ 2008-06-28 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.214665020E09 +++$+++ ''(Answered on article's talk page).'' -- +++$+++ :''(Answered on article's talk page).'' --[[User:Summerman|Summerman]] ([[User talk:Summerman|talk]]) 07:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

283824 +++$+++ JGXenite +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283824 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-06 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.215372900E09 +++$+++ Hey. I've [[User talk:JGXenite#The Patrick Star Show afd|replied on my talk page]], but the general jist is I think TWINKLE messed up. Thanks for fixing it :). ~~  +++$+++ Hey. I've [[User talk:JGXenite#The Patrick Star Show afd|replied on my talk page]], but the general jist is I think TWINKLE messed up. Thanks for fixing it :). ~~ [[User:JGXenite|<span style="color: #AB0F31">[Jam]</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:JGXenite|<span style="color: #000000;">[talk]</span>]]</sup> 12:35, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
283825 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283824 +++$+++ 283824 +++$+++ 2008-07-06 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.215372960E09 +++$+++ Ok, no problem :) -- +++$+++ :Ok, no problem :) --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 12:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
283826 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283824 +++$+++ 283824 +++$+++ 2008-07-20 21:41:00 +++$+++ 1.216615260E09 +++$+++ I wasn't following you around per se, I just noticed you made some inappropriate and unconstructive edits (e.g., [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Clarence_Thomas&diff=prev&oldid=226784568 this inflammatory racial content]), and reverted them accordingly. -- +++$+++ :I wasn't following you around per se, I just noticed you made some inappropriate and unconstructive edits (e.g., [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clarence_Thomas&diff=prev&oldid=226784568 this inflammatory racial content]), and reverted them accordingly. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 21:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
283827 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283824 +++$+++ 283824 +++$+++ 2008-07-20 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.216617060E09 +++$+++ You might want to review Wikipedia's policies regarding [[WP:V|sourcing]] and the [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but personal opinions don't belong in Wikipedia articles. Content in Wikipedia articles must be substantiated with [[WP:SOURCES|reliable sources]]. -- +++$+++ :You might want to review Wikipedia's policies regarding [[WP:V|sourcing]] and the [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but personal opinions don't belong in Wikipedia articles. Content in Wikipedia articles must be substantiated with [[WP:SOURCES|reliable sources]]. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 22:11, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

545970 +++$+++ ImperfectlyInformed +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-13 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.247532300E09 +++$+++ Interesting little story of the academic world.  +++$+++ Interesting little story of the academic world. [[User:ImperfectlyInformed|<span style="font-family: Times">II</span>]] | ([[User_talk:ImperfectlyInformed|t]] - [[Special:Contributions/ImperfectlyInformed|c]]) 17:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
545971 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545970 +++$+++ 545970 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.247533140E09 +++$+++ Very true, a librarian I talked to referred to the sudden appearance of all the expensive ''Nature reviews in ..'' journals as \"The Nature explosion\".  +++$+++ :Very true, a librarian I talked to referred to the sudden appearance of all the expensive ''Nature reviews in ..'' journals as "The Nature explosion". [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 17:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

21683 +++$+++ 92.149.81.197 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-26 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.298791440E09 +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions\/92.149.81.197|92.149.81.197]] ( +++$+++ [[Special:Contributions/92.149.81.197|92.149.81.197]] ([[User talk:92.149.81.197|talk]]) 23:24, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
21684 +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21683 +++$+++ 21683 +++$+++ 2011-02-26 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.298792160E09 +++$+++ No, it isn't. And I suggest you stop adding those two episodes. If I find a reliable source for those two episodes, then, and only then, will I add those two episodes.  +++$+++ : No, it isn't. And I suggest you stop adding those two episodes. If I find a reliable source for those two episodes, then, and only then, will I add those two episodes. [[User:AdamDeanHall|AdamDeanHall]] ([[User talk:AdamDeanHall#top|talk]]) 23:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
21685 +++$+++ BurienBomber +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21683 +++$+++ 21684 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.298799240E09 +++$+++ AdamDean, you DO NOT own the Desperate Housewives articles.  Please stop talking like you and only you can add or update them.  You have been told this MANY, MANY times.  +++$+++ :: AdamDean, you DO NOT own the Desperate Housewives articles.  Please stop talking like you and only you can add or update them.  You have been told this MANY, MANY times. [[User:BurienBomber|BurienBomber]] ([[User talk:BurienBomber|talk]]) 01:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
21686 +++$+++ a +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21683 +++$+++ 21685 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.299227580E09 +++$+++ ^Preach ... -- <font face=\"Trebuchet MS\" > +++$+++ ::: ^Preach ... -- <font face="Trebuchet MS" >[[User:A|A]] <small><sup>'''[[User talk:A|talk]]'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/A|contribs]]'''</sub></small></font> 00:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

283828 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-12 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.218609480E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Lathander|Lathander]], an article you have been involved in editing, has been nominated for deletion. If there is anything you can do to improve the article so that it may be kept, please do so.  :)  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lathander|Lathander]], an article you have been involved in editing, has been nominated for deletion. If there is anything you can do to improve the article so that it may be kept, please do so.  :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 23:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
283829 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283828 +++$+++ 283828 +++$+++ 2008-08-13 11:40:00 +++$+++ 1.218652800E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the heads-up. As far as I can tell I didn't edit this article except to remove a deleted image, but I'll take a look at the article and deletion debate. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the heads-up. As far as I can tell I didn't edit this article except to remove a deleted image, but I'll take a look at the article and deletion debate. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 11:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
283830 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283828 +++$+++ 283829 +++$+++ 2008-08-13 17:04:00 +++$+++ 1.218672240E09 +++$+++ Good enough, thanks.  :)  +++$+++ ::Good enough, thanks.  :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 17:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

437174 +++$+++ Seth Ilys +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437174 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-06-14 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.150317120E09 +++$+++ Marshman: I noticed that you commented on the [[Caroline Island]] article once. I've expanded it greatly, and I'm trying to get it up to [[WP:FA|featured article]] status, so I was wondering if you could take another look at it, fix anything you might see, and let me know what else you think might be done to improve the article. Thanks! --  +++$+++ Marshman: I noticed that you commented on the [[Caroline Island]] article once. I've expanded it greatly, and I'm trying to get it up to [[WP:FA|featured article]] status, so I was wondering if you could take another look at it, fix anything you might see, and let me know what else you think might be done to improve the article. Thanks! -- [[User:Seth Ilys|Seth Ilys]] 13:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
437175 +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ Marshman +++$+++ 437174 +++$+++ 437174 +++$+++ 2006-06-21 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.150940340E09 +++$+++ Will do -  +++$+++ :Will do - [[User:Marshman|Marshman]] 18:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

283833 +++$+++  +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-20 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.219291140E09 +++$+++ I noticed you helped some with the [[TaskMaker]] page, so I thought I'd let you know that I updated it some. I even added a screenshot.  +++$+++ I noticed you helped some with the [[TaskMaker]] page, so I thought I'd let you know that I updated it some. I even added a screenshot. [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 20:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
283834 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283833 +++$+++ 283833 +++$+++ 2008-08-20 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.219291320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up, looks good. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up, looks good. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 21:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
283835 +++$+++  +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283833 +++$+++ 283834 +++$+++ 2008-08-21 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.219322580E09 +++$+++ Think I should spin the sequel off into a separate page? There is a decent length Allgame review, but I'm not finding too much else (after all, version 1.0 was released just as Storm Impact went splat).  +++$+++ ::Think I should spin the sequel off into a separate page? There is a decent length Allgame review, but I'm not finding too much else (after all, version 1.0 was released just as Storm Impact went splat). [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 05:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
283836 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283833 +++$+++ 283835 +++$+++ 2008-08-21 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.219355340E09 +++$+++ I think a redirect to the subsection is fine, probably not enough sources to establish independent notability for the sequel. -- +++$+++ :::I think a redirect to the subsection is fine, probably not enough sources to establish independent notability for the sequel. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 14:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

454285 +++$+++ Digitalmischief +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-14 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.229283120E09 +++$+++ LOL. You and I are on the same page, in more ways than one. Cheers. -- +++$+++ LOL. You and I are on the same page, in more ways than one. Cheers. --[[User:Digitalmischief|OliverTwisted]] ([[User talk:Digitalmischief|talk]]) 11:32, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
454286 +++$+++ fvw +++$+++ Fvw +++$+++ 454285 +++$+++ 454285 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.229283180E09 +++$+++ I hope it's not a page in [[The Five Keys of the Sphinx]], or we'll soon be running short of reading material... -- +++$+++ :I hope it's not a page in [[The Five Keys of the Sphinx]], or we'll soon be running short of reading material... --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 11:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

265759 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265759 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 13:46:00 +++$+++ 1.163713560E09 +++$+++ Yes, that is a good way to proceed.  However, I am trying to understand what is going on.  I asked you whether you agreed that it is not good to have two articles on the same subject with different article names, what would be your solution to this problem, and whether you understood that I do not mind what name is used.  I didn't get the point of your answer.  I know it is sometimes frustrating to try to communicate, when communication does not seem to be working.  So, if you would like to take a break that is fine.  However, if you would like to continue, we could either go back to the questions I asked above (about two articles on the same topic), or perhaps you could help me to understand the point you would like to make regarding acting arbitrarily and alone.  I feel bad that this seems to be difficult.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ Yes, that is a good way to proceed.  However, I am trying to understand what is going on.  I asked you whether you agreed that it is not good to have two articles on the same subject with different article names, what would be your solution to this problem, and whether you understood that I do not mind what name is used.  I didn't get the point of your answer.  I know it is sometimes frustrating to try to communicate, when communication does not seem to be working.  So, if you would like to take a break that is fine.  However, if you would like to continue, we could either go back to the questions I asked above (about two articles on the same topic), or perhaps you could help me to understand the point you would like to make regarding acting arbitrarily and alone.  I feel bad that this seems to be difficult.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 13:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265760 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265759 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 14:41:00 +++$+++ 1.163716860E09 +++$+++ Again, I agree with Dineshkannambadi, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=87007572&oldid=86883510] This was his response (to my response) to a proposal he had made and discussed with me and others over this very issue you are asking me about now. If you want, I will try to layout what he is saying, but he says it better than I would. Maybe you would explain why, if you don't care what name is used, your choice is 999's, the name less recognized and rather incorrect according to Dineshkannambadi, who looked into the matter? 999 had already wiped out one of my just created articles maybe 10 minutes after I created it and a few minutes before the incident on the Falls merge occured, and I am guessing now that you were involved in that also. (I thought I was going crazy - at the time I couldn't figure out what was happening.) I'm not accusing you of being against me because I know that is not true. But my opinion, since you are asking for it, is that incident is an example of sloppy  behavior (not fully checking things out) and such incidents contribute greatly to the bad feeling at Wikipedia. (Plus, and this really bothers me, 999 and  Hanuman Das were able to use you to harass me - I know it was unwitting on your part. Not fully checking thing out opens you up to this. And I wonder now why you would choose Hanuman Das as the ultimate arbitrator on the temple issue. He is a neopagan from Texas and knows nothing about temples in India.   +++$+++ ::Again, I agree with Dineshkannambadi, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattisse&diff=87007572&oldid=86883510] This was his response (to my response) to a proposal he had made and discussed with me and others over this very issue you are asking me about now. If you want, I will try to layout what he is saying, but he says it better than I would. Maybe you would explain why, if you don't care what name is used, your choice is 999's, the name less recognized and rather incorrect according to Dineshkannambadi, who looked into the matter? 999 had already wiped out one of my just created articles maybe 10 minutes after I created it and a few minutes before the incident on the Falls merge occured, and I am guessing now that you were involved in that also. (I thought I was going crazy - at the time I couldn't figure out what was happening.) I'm not accusing you of being against me because I know that is not true. But my opinion, since you are asking for it, is that incident is an example of sloppy  behavior (not fully checking things out) and such incidents contribute greatly to the bad feeling at Wikipedia. (Plus, and this really bothers me, 999 and  Hanuman Das were able to use you to harass me - I know it was unwitting on your part. Not fully checking thing out opens you up to this. And I wonder now why you would choose Hanuman Das as the ultimate arbitrator on the temple issue. He is a neopagan from Texas and knows nothing about temples in India.  [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 14:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265761 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265759 +++$+++ 265759 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.163718420E09 +++$+++ You say that Hanuman Das or 999 were able to use me to harass you, that I did not fully check things out, was sloppy etc.  What did I do that you think I ought not to have done?  That is something that I am trying to understand.  Please help me in this.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :You say that Hanuman Das or 999 were able to use me to harass you, that I did not fully check things out, was sloppy etc.  What did I do that you think I ought not to have done?  That is something that I am trying to understand.  Please help me in this.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 15:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265762 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265759 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.163730420E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
265763 +++$+++  +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265759 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ Would you be adverse to taking the merge off Sivasamudram Falls? If you look at the edit history you will see the merge was slapped on there by User:999 within minutes of my creation of the article -- 6 minutes to be exact -- back in the days when he was stalking me and able to make my life miserable. Mattisse(talk) 23:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ :::::Would you be adverse to taking the merge off Sivasamudram Falls? If you look at the edit history you will see the merge was slapped on there by User:999 within minutes of my creation of the article -- 6 minutes to be exact -- back in the days when he was stalking me and able to make my life miserable. Mattisse(talk) 23:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
265764 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265759 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 20:29:00 +++$+++ 1.163737740E09 +++$+++ On the other hand, '''if''' there are plans to write an article about the village which isn't essentially about the waterfalls, for example if it were to discuss temples in the village, then I would not object to separate articles.  -- +++$+++ ::::On the other hand, '''if''' there are plans to write an article about the village which isn't essentially about the waterfalls, for example if it were to discuss temples in the village, then I would not object to separate articles.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 20:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

545980 +++$+++ Kingpin13 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545980 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-16 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.247792340E09 +++$+++ Ah, thanks for that, I was just wondering if I should create a sockpuppet report, or explain to the users about personal sandboxes :). Anyway, I'll keep an eye on them (I presume you are?). Cheers -  +++$+++ Ah, thanks for that, I was just wondering if I should create a sockpuppet report, or explain to the users about personal sandboxes :). Anyway, I'll keep an eye on them (I presume you are?). Cheers - [[User:Kingpin13|Kingpin]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Kingpin13|13]]</sup> ([[User talk:Kingpin13|talk]]) 17:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
545981 +++$+++ Kingpin13 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545980 +++$+++ 545980 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.247792520E09 +++$+++ Oh, BTW, you may want to delete the pages left over after the move (they can be foun in my move log) under [[WP:CSD#R2]]. Thanks -  +++$+++ :Oh, BTW, you may want to delete the pages left over after the move (they can be foun in my move log) under [[WP:CSD#R2]]. Thanks - [[User:Kingpin13|Kingpin]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Kingpin13|13]]</sup> ([[User talk:Kingpin13|talk]]) 18:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
545982 +++$+++ Kingpin13 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545980 +++$+++ 545981 +++$+++ 2009-07-16 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.247792940E09 +++$+++ Never mind, [[User:SoWhy]] has now done so. -  +++$+++ ::Never mind, [[User:SoWhy]] has now done so. - [[User:Kingpin13|Kingpin]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Kingpin13|13]]</sup> ([[User talk:Kingpin13|talk]]) 18:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

283837 +++$+++ mrg3105 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283837 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-19 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.221817740E09 +++$+++ What is your problem with this article and the disambiguation? Pioneer is rarely used in the meaning \"settler\" today, and even less so in the meaning \"inventor\". It is however used by a variety of military organisations, still. The military noun meaning was the original meaning, and if you look at other articles, defining etymology is usually the good start to writing an article-- +++$+++ What is your problem with this article and the disambiguation? Pioneer is rarely used in the meaning "settler" today, and even less so in the meaning "inventor". It is however used by a variety of military organisations, still. The military noun meaning was the original meaning, and if you look at other articles, defining etymology is usually the good start to writing an article--[[User:mrg3105|mrg3105]] ([[User talk:mrg3105|comms]]) ♠<font color="#BB0000">♥</font><font color="#BB0000">♦</font>♣ 02:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
283838 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283837 +++$+++ 283837 +++$+++ 2008-09-19 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.221821460E09 +++$+++ Hi there, thank you for contacting me about this. I'm sorry for my part in escalating this dispute, we should have discussed from the outset instead of reverting each other. Let me give you my take on both issues on the respective talk pages, [[Talk:Pioneer]] and [[Talk:Pioneer (disambiguation)]]. I'll add a note at [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Lead section]] requesting further input. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Hi there, thank you for contacting me about this. I'm sorry for my part in escalating this dispute, we should have discussed from the outset instead of reverting each other. Let me give you my take on both issues on the respective talk pages, [[Talk:Pioneer]] and [[Talk:Pioneer (disambiguation)]]. I'll add a note at [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Lead section]] requesting further input. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 03:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

21695 +++$+++ Curly Turkey +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-14 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.308119100E09 +++$+++ Given that ''Batman'' is a US title, some would argue that the US spelling should be preferred (assuming the rest of the article consistently uses US spelling).<\/s>  <span style=\"padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;\"> +++$+++ Given that ''Batman'' is a US title, some would argue that the US spelling should be preferred (assuming the rest of the article consistently uses US spelling).</s>  <span style="padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;">[[User:Curly Turkey|<b><span style="color:#520;">C</span><span style="color:#f60;">üRly</span><span style="color:#040;">T</span><span style="color:#090;">üRkey</span></b>]]<small><sup style="margin-left:1.5ex;">[[User_talk:Curly Turkey|Talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-5ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Curly Turkey|Contribs]]</sub></small></span> 23:25, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
21696 +++$+++ Curly Turkey +++$+++ AdamDeanHall +++$+++ 21695 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-14 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.308119280E09 +++$+++ SORRY!  That message was meant for the editor who corrected your spelling.  <span style=\"padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;\"> +++$+++ :::SORRY!  That message was meant for the editor who corrected your spelling.  <span style="padding:0 .75ex;font-variant:small-caps;background-color:#fdd;">[[User:Curly Turkey|<b><span style="color:#520;">C</span><span style="color:#f60;">üRly</span><span style="color:#040;">T</span><span style="color:#090;">üRkey</span></b>]]<small><sup style="margin-left:1.5ex;">[[User_talk:Curly Turkey|Talk]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-5ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Curly Turkey|Contribs]]</sub></small></span> 23:28, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

283840 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283840 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-19 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.224414960E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For excellent and quick writing on a now-strong article, [[Al (folklore)]]  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For excellent and quick writing on a now-strong article, [[Al (folklore)]] [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 04:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
283841 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283840 +++$+++ 283840 +++$+++ 2008-10-19 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.224415260E09 +++$+++ Thank you :) -- +++$+++ :Thank you :) --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 04:21, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

283842 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283842 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-10 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.226377200E09 +++$+++ Hello. :) If you hadn't heard, [[Gary Gygax]] and [[Wizards of the Coast]] have recently been promoted to \"Good Article\" status. I was also thinking of nominating [[Dragonlance]] and [[Forgotten Realms]], and I figured I'd contact you since you've done some work on at least one of those. See the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons#Dragonlance and Forgotten Realms|project talk page]] for discussion on that.  +++$+++ Hello. :) If you hadn't heard, [[Gary Gygax]] and [[Wizards of the Coast]] have recently been promoted to "Good Article" status. I was also thinking of nominating [[Dragonlance]] and [[Forgotten Realms]], and I figured I'd contact you since you've done some work on at least one of those. See the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons#Dragonlance and Forgotten Realms|project talk page]] for discussion on that. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 20:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
283843 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283842 +++$+++ 283842 +++$+++ 2008-11-11 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.226399880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up, I'll take a look. And kudos for your hard work in getting those articles promoted. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up, I'll take a look. And kudos for your hard work in getting those articles promoted. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 02:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
283844 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283842 +++$+++ 283843 +++$+++ 2008-11-11 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.226400600E09 +++$+++ Danke. :)  +++$+++ ::Danke. :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 02:50, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

21700 +++$+++ Rjanag +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21700 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-01 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.241198520E09 +++$+++ I saw from [[:Category:Current Wikipedia birthdays|here]] that it's been exactly one year since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday!  Keep up the good work, <b class=\"Unicode\"> +++$+++ I saw from [[:Category:Current Wikipedia birthdays|here]] that it's been exactly one year since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday!  Keep up the good work, <b class="Unicode">[[User:Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>[[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|contribs]]</sub></small> 10:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
21701 +++$+++ Quadell +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21700 +++$+++ 21700 +++$+++ 2009-05-01 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.241235540E09 +++$+++ And a happy wiki-anniversary from me too! &ndash;  +++$+++ :And a happy wiki-anniversary from me too! &ndash; [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]])</sup> 20:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

283845 +++$+++  +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283845 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-23 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.227498780E09 +++$+++ I was getting ready to request page protection, since the edit warring has been going on for over a month now.  I was surprised to see how quickly my version was reverted though.  I'll drop a note on ANI, though I'm pretty sure there are some language issues coming into play [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Unbal&diff=253575095&oldid=250168808].  BTW, thanks for my first barnstar!   +++$+++ I was getting ready to request page protection, since the edit warring has been going on for over a month now.  I was surprised to see how quickly my version was reverted though.  I'll drop a note on ANI, though I'm pretty sure there are some language issues coming into play [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Unbal&diff=253575095&oldid=250168808].  BTW, thanks for my first barnstar!  [[User:dchall1|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#006400">'''Chris'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:dchall1|<span style="color:#006400">(complaints)</span>]]•[[:Special:Contributions/dchall1|<span style="color:#006400">(contribs)</span>]]</sup> 19:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
283846 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283845 +++$+++ 283845 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.227500280E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I expect language issues may be a factor here. Still, if we can get a few more sets of eyes on the article, that can only be a good thing. And congrats on an excellent rewrite. -- +++$+++ :Yeah, I expect language issues may be a factor here. Still, if we can get a few more sets of eyes on the article, that can only be a good thing. And congrats on an excellent rewrite. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 20:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
283847 +++$+++  +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283845 +++$+++ 283846 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.227839220E09 +++$+++ If you haven't noticed, all 4 disruptive users have been indef blocked.  I definitely went over 4RR, but i'm pretty sure admins won't care due to the disruption.  Thanks again for your support!   +++$+++ ::If you haven't noticed, all 4 disruptive users have been indef blocked.  I definitely went over 4RR, but i'm pretty sure admins won't care due to the disruption.  Thanks again for your support!  [[User:dchall1|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#006400">'''Chris'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:dchall1|<span style="color:#006400">(complaints)</span>]]•[[:Special:Contributions/dchall1|<span style="color:#006400">(contribs)</span>]]</sup> 18:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
283848 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283845 +++$+++ 283847 +++$+++ 2008-11-27 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.227839580E09 +++$+++ I hope that settles the matter, hopefully now we can concentrate on improving the article! -- +++$+++ :::I hope that settles the matter, hopefully now we can concentrate on improving the article! --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 18:33, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

21702 +++$+++ TreyGeek +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-02 05:18:00 +++$+++ 1.241266680E09 +++$+++ After all this time can you not create an article with the appropriate [[WP:CITE|citation and source]] tags, as you failed to do with [[Daniel Weichel]], or create articles that follow the consensus of [[WP:MMA]] and not place location flags in record histories?  While we appreciate you creating and improving articles on notable MMA fighters, it seems as if you are almost excessive in your article creation.  -- +++$+++ After all this time can you not create an article with the appropriate [[WP:CITE|citation and source]] tags, as you failed to do with [[Daniel Weichel]], or create articles that follow the consensus of [[WP:MMA]] and not place location flags in record histories?  While we appreciate you creating and improving articles on notable MMA fighters, it seems as if you are almost excessive in your article creation.  --[[User:TreyGeek|TreyGeek]] ([[User talk:TreyGeek|talk]]) 05:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
21703 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21702 +++$+++ 21702 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ I make sure in all of the articles i create that enough sources are cited, i also read and make sure im following most of the wikipedia rules and guidelines for article creation, i did not know if the removal of location flags in info boxes was a finalized rule or not, it isnt against the rules to make to many articles....Sepulwiki 05:22, 2 May 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ :I make sure in all of the articles i create that enough sources are cited, i also read and make sure im following most of the wikipedia rules and guidelines for article creation, i did not know if the removal of location flags in info boxes was a finalized rule or not, it isnt against the rules to make to many articles....Sepulwiki 05:22, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
21704 +++$+++ TreyGeek +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21702 +++$+++ 21703 +++$+++ 2009-05-02 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.241269500E09 +++$+++ [[WP:CITE]] discusses the appropriate citation tags to use that provide information other than a simple URL between <nowiki><ref><\/ref><\/nowiki> can provide.  As for location flags, I have previously put a notice on your talk page about them (though you deleted such notice); if you look at the MMA project talk page (which you consider yourself a member of), specifically [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mixed_martial_arts#Flags_for_Locations_in_Record_Boxes]] you will see a request by myself that location flags are redundant and should not be placed in record boxes.  No one disagrees, including yourself as a MMA Project member.  Therefore, location flag in record boxes should not be added as they are redundant.  -- +++$+++ ::[[WP:CITE]] discusses the appropriate citation tags to use that provide information other than a simple URL between <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> can provide.  As for location flags, I have previously put a notice on your talk page about them (though you deleted such notice); if you look at the MMA project talk page (which you consider yourself a member of), specifically [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mixed_martial_arts#Flags_for_Locations_in_Record_Boxes]] you will see a request by myself that location flags are redundant and should not be placed in record boxes.  No one disagrees, including yourself as a MMA Project member.  Therefore, location flag in record boxes should not be added as they are redundant.  --[[User:TreyGeek|TreyGeek]] ([[User talk:TreyGeek|talk]]) 06:05, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

545992 +++$+++ Wikiwatcher1 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-22 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.248329700E09 +++$+++ Tim, if you get a few minutes would you mind reviewing a new article I posted for [[Yury Verlinsky]]?  Any comments and suggestions would be appreciated.  Thanks. -- +++$+++ Tim, if you get a few minutes would you mind reviewing a new article I posted for [[Yury Verlinsky]]?  Any comments and suggestions would be appreciated.  Thanks. --[[User:Wikiwatcher1|Wikiwatcher1]] ([[User talk:Wikiwatcher1|talk]]) 23:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
545993 +++$+++ Wikiwatcher1 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545992 +++$+++ 545992 +++$+++ 2009-07-22 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.248331020E09 +++$+++ Added one of the cites, but wanted to make sure the cite format was correct before I add any more. -- +++$+++ :Added one of the cites, but wanted to make sure the cite format was correct before I add any more. --[[User:Wikiwatcher1|Wikiwatcher1]] ([[User talk:Wikiwatcher1|talk]]) 23:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
545994 +++$+++ Wikiwatcher1 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545992 +++$+++ 545992 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.248338340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for appending the image file. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for appending the image file. --[[User:Wikiwatcher1|Wikiwatcher1]] ([[User talk:Wikiwatcher1|talk]]) 01:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

21705 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21705 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ So the websites im getting my sources from are not reliable or im not coding it right? either way i dont see how im wrong being that your the only one who has problem with my articles, in fact i have been praised by people for the mass amounts of articles i create and how perfect i try to make them.Sepulwiki 06:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ So the websites im getting my sources from are not reliable or im not coding it right? either way i dont see how im wrong being that your the only one who has problem with my articles, in fact i have been praised by people for the mass amounts of articles i create and how perfect i try to make them.Sepulwiki 06:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
21706 +++$+++ TreyGeek +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21705 +++$+++ 21705 +++$+++ 2009-05-02 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.241271060E09 +++$+++ After reading [[WP:CITE]] and [[WP:CIT]] you are saying that you are coding your sources correctly?  As for being praised for your \"mass amounts of articles\" where is that praise?  I just looked through your talk history and can't find it.  -- +++$+++ :After reading [[WP:CITE]] and [[WP:CIT]] you are saying that you are coding your sources correctly?  As for being praised for your "mass amounts of articles" where is that praise?  I just looked through your talk history and can't find it.  --[[User:TreyGeek|TreyGeek]] ([[User talk:TreyGeek|talk]]) 06:31, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

283850 +++$+++ Milomedes +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283850 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-22 10:32:00 +++$+++ 1.229970720E09 +++$+++ While I was away editing I see that you have stated your reason at the article. Your revert for the stated reason of title format seems a reasonable cause pending my research of the issue, but you should ''not'' have opened an WP:RM <u>''during an RfC''<\/u> at least until you had discussed it at the RFC and determined that we could not quickly agree. (And there was no previous RfC \u2013 the same one has been extended for three months due to lack of interest.) Now even if we can quickly agree, the entire holiday that is available to me and the other editor is going to be lost before the WP:RM is closed. This is the thoughtless kind of process use that causes editors to leave in frustration.  +++$+++ While I was away editing I see that you have stated your reason at the article. Your revert for the stated reason of title format seems a reasonable cause pending my research of the issue, but you should ''not'' have opened an WP:RM <u>''during an RfC''</u> at least until you had discussed it at the RFC and determined that we could not quickly agree. (And there was no previous RfC – the same one has been extended for three months due to lack of interest.) Now even if we can quickly agree, the entire holiday that is available to me and the other editor is going to be lost before the WP:RM is closed. This is the thoughtless kind of process use that causes editors to leave in frustration. [[User:Milomedes|Milo]] 10:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
283851 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283850 +++$+++ 283850 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.229973960E09 +++$+++ I don't feel that withdrawing the move request is necessary, because I maintain that there are issues that need to be resolved before we move forward with a rename, and WP:RM is an effective way to do this. I don't have a horse in this race, I just think we should have prior discussion from as many interested parties as possible (something that didn't really occur at RfC) before moving a high profile article like this one. I'm hopeful that WP:RM will attract constructive input from interested third parties to resolve this issue one way or the other, and I'm happy to abide by whatever consensus emerges there. -- +++$+++ :I don't feel that withdrawing the move request is necessary, because I maintain that there are issues that need to be resolved before we move forward with a rename, and WP:RM is an effective way to do this. I don't have a horse in this race, I just think we should have prior discussion from as many interested parties as possible (something that didn't really occur at RfC) before moving a high profile article like this one. I'm hopeful that WP:RM will attract constructive input from interested third parties to resolve this issue one way or the other, and I'm happy to abide by whatever consensus emerges there. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 11:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
283852 +++$+++ Milomedes +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283850 +++$+++ 283851 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.229990220E09 +++$+++ If the points you made really aren't correct, I'm guessing that you think the guiderules still have things in them that are long gone. I know that happened to me a lot before I wised up.  +++$+++ ::If the points you made really aren't correct, I'm guessing that you think the guiderules still have things in them that are long gone. I know that happened to me a lot before I wised up. [[User:Milomedes|Milo]] 15:57, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
283853 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283850 +++$+++ 283852 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.230001140E09 +++$+++ Followed up at [[Talk:Pop music#Discussion]]. If you feel my conduct here or in general is to the detriment of WP, feel free to file a [[WP:RFC\/U|user conduct RfC]] and I'll participate in it in good faith. Regards and happy holidays. -- +++$+++ :::Followed up at [[Talk:Pop music#Discussion]]. If you feel my conduct here or in general is to the detriment of WP, feel free to file a [[WP:RFC/U|user conduct RfC]] and I'll participate in it in good faith. Regards and happy holidays. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 18:59, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
283854 +++$+++ Milomedes +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283850 +++$+++ 283853 +++$+++ 2008-12-22 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.230018240E09 +++$+++ On the plus side, I do like your attitude.  +++$+++ ::::On the plus side, I do like your attitude. [[User:Milomedes|Milo]] 23:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
283855 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283850 +++$+++ 283854 +++$+++ 2008-12-23 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.230029400E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'm clear on why you took exception to my actions and I'll bear it mind for future situations. Since your immediate concerns relate to guideline interpretations and not user conduct issues, I'll consider the issue closed pending the outcome of the move discussion, and direct followups to Talk:Pop music. -- +++$+++ :::::Okay, I'm clear on why you took exception to my actions and I'll bear it mind for future situations. Since your immediate concerns relate to guideline interpretations and not user conduct issues, I'll consider the issue closed pending the outcome of the move discussion, and direct followups to Talk:Pop music. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 02:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

545996 +++$+++ Zebranih +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545996 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-23 18:18:00 +++$+++ 1.248398280E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Zebranih|Zebranih]] ([[User talk:Zebranih|talk]]) 18:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
545997 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545996 +++$+++ 545996 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.248398580E09 +++$+++ Top of this page, on the left in the \"toolbox\" (which is the 3rd box down under the Wikipedia globe), otherwise I've copied the link [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:EmailUser\/TimVickers here].  +++$+++ :Top of this page, on the left in the "toolbox" (which is the 3rd box down under the Wikipedia globe), otherwise I've copied the link [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/TimVickers here]. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 18:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
545998 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545996 +++$+++ 545997 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.248401280E09 +++$+++ Zebranih, the issue may be that you have to have email enabled on your own account in order to email others. If you don't see the \"Email this user\" link, you can go to the \"My preferences\" tab at the top of the screen and, under the first tab, specify an email address for yourself. Note that when you email people, they will see this email address in the header, so if you'd like to stay (relatively) anonymous you may not want to use an account that links directly to your name. Once you specify an email account, the \"Email this user\" link should show up on the side of Tim's page as he suggested.<p>Tim, we should probably let people know about this - it hadn't occurred to me earlier. If people sign up and then look for the \"Email this user\" link, they won't see it unless they specify an email address of their own in their account preferences. We might want to spread the word to avoid confusion. ''' +++$+++ ::Zebranih, the issue may be that you have to have email enabled on your own account in order to email others. If you don't see the "Email this user" link, you can go to the "My preferences" tab at the top of the screen and, under the first tab, specify an email address for yourself. Note that when you email people, they will see this email address in the header, so if you'd like to stay (relatively) anonymous you may not want to use an account that links directly to your name. Once you specify an email account, the "Email this user" link should show up on the side of Tim's page as he suggested.<p>Tim, we should probably let people know about this - it hadn't occurred to me earlier. If people sign up and then look for the "Email this user" link, they won't see it unless they specify an email address of their own in their account preferences. We might want to spread the word to avoid confusion. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 19:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
545999 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 545996 +++$+++ 545998 +++$+++ 2009-07-23 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.248401880E09 +++$+++ I never knew that, thanks MastCell!  +++$+++ :::I never knew that, thanks MastCell! [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 19:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

283856 +++$+++ Scwlong +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283856 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-30 01:43:00 +++$+++ 1.230630180E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(titles)#Games]]  +++$+++ [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(titles)#Games]] [[User:Scwlong|Scwlong]] ([[User talk:Scwlong|talk]]) 01:43, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
283857 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283856 +++$+++ 283856 +++$+++ 2008-12-30 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.230654180E09 +++$+++ Interesting, thank you. -- +++$+++ :Interesting, thank you. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 08:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

546001 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546001 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-13 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.247533680E09 +++$+++ Best,  +++$+++ Best, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
546002 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546001 +++$+++ 546001 +++$+++ 2009-07-14 18:13:00 +++$+++ 1.247620380E09 +++$+++ If I only had your patience and good nature :)   +++$+++ : If I only had your patience and good nature :)  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
546003 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546001 +++$+++ 546002 +++$+++ 2009-07-14 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.247632200E09 +++$+++ Oh, trust me, Tim himself is a seething cauldron of rage. Fortunately for Wikipedia, he's [http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/livescience\/20090713\/sc_livescience\/catsdocontrolhumansstudyfinds under the control of his patient, good-natured cat]. ''' +++$+++ ::Oh, trust me, Tim himself is a seething cauldron of rage. Fortunately for Wikipedia, he's [http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20090713/sc_livescience/catsdocontrolhumansstudyfinds under the control of his patient, good-natured cat]. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 21:30, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

283858 +++$+++ BlueCaper +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283858 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-12 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.231830960E09 +++$+++ If you are not sure what a WikiProject is, it is a club of Wikipedians interested in the WikiProject's subject and helping to improve articles of or related to that subject.  I saw you greatly contributed to the [[Samurai Warriors]] article, so I figured I'd ask if you wanted to participate in [[Wikipedia:Wikiproject\/Koei Warriors Games]].  You do not have to, and neither are you obliged; I am just asking.  - +++$+++ If you are not sure what a WikiProject is, it is a club of Wikipedians interested in the WikiProject's subject and helping to improve articles of or related to that subject.  I saw you greatly contributed to the [[Samurai Warriors]] article, so I figured I'd ask if you wanted to participate in [[Wikipedia:Wikiproject/Koei Warriors Games]].  You do not have to, and neither are you obliged; I am just asking.  -[[User:BlueCaper|'''<em style="font-family:Georgia;color:blue">Blue</em>'''<em style="font-family:Georgia;color:black">'''''Caper</em>''''']] ([[User talk:BlueCaper|talk]]) 23:16, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
283859 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283858 +++$+++ 283858 +++$+++ 2009-01-12 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.231831200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the invite but I'm not really familiar enough with the Koei games to be a productive contributor to this project. Regards. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the invite but I'm not really familiar enough with the Koei games to be a productive contributor to this project. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 23:20, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

283860 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-26 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.233027480E09 +++$+++ Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article [[Forgotten Realms]], I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for \"Good Article\" status. You can view the [[Talk:Forgotten Realms\/GA1\u200e|review page]], and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :)  +++$+++ Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article [[Forgotten Realms]], I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the [[Talk:Forgotten Realms/GA1‎|review page]], and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 19:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
283861 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283860 +++$+++ 283860 +++$+++ 2009-01-27 08:37:00 +++$+++ 1.233074220E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up. Looks like the expert D&D editors have things pretty well in hand here, I don't think there's much I can add. Good luck with the GA review. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up. Looks like the expert D&D editors have things pretty well in hand here, I don't think there's much I can add. Good luck with the GA review. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 08:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
283862 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283860 +++$+++ 283861 +++$+++ 2009-01-27 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.233092820E09 +++$+++ No problem!  We've been on a roll lately, and got [[Gary Gygax]], [[Wizards of the Coast]], [[Dragons of Despair]], and [[Drizzt Do'Urden]] up to GA within the last 4 months. :)  +++$+++ ::No problem!  We've been on a roll lately, and got [[Gary Gygax]], [[Wizards of the Coast]], [[Dragons of Despair]], and [[Drizzt Do'Urden]] up to GA within the last 4 months. :) [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 13:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

21717 +++$+++  +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21717 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-25 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.243235580E09 +++$+++ I agree with most of what your saying, but the article is notable in more than one way, he is getting another fight for M-1 Mixfight and just got assigned to Team Japan. He is also the nephew of [[Enson Inoue]], i will take your advice and try not to create the not so important articles, what actually made me do Seigo was because i saw the [[Mike Dolce]] article, it would be nice if you would not put Seigo up for deletion, if in a couple of months his career gets worse ill consider deleting it myself.Sepulwiki 00:13, 25 May 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ I agree with most of what your saying, but the article is notable in more than one way, he is getting another fight for M-1 Mixfight and just got assigned to Team Japan. He is also the nephew of [[Enson Inoue]], i will take your advice and try not to create the not so important articles, what actually made me do Seigo was because i saw the [[Mike Dolce]] article, it would be nice if you would not put Seigo up for deletion, if in a couple of months his career gets worse ill consider deleting it myself.Sepulwiki 00:13, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
21718 +++$+++ aktsu +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21717 +++$+++ 21717 +++$+++ 2009-05-25 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.243236840E09 +++$+++ You should add that stuff to the article then :) I know searching up info (and proper sources) on these guys is hard, but creating actual articles is what we should be about.  Looking at the Google-translated version of his page on Sengoku-Official you could make a pretty decent article one him: he was a runner-up in \"JTC 2005 National\" at 67kg (..whatever that is :p) and the winner of Deep's 2007 Future King Tournament. A career-recap mentioning that and what you said would make at least a few sections, which is basically how I wrote [[Jung Chan Sung]], and I think most would agree something like that is ''far'' prefered to just the record. -- +++$+++ :You should add that stuff to the article then :) I know searching up info (and proper sources) on these guys is hard, but creating actual articles is what we should be about.  Looking at the Google-translated version of his page on Sengoku-Official you could make a pretty decent article one him: he was a runner-up in "JTC 2005 National" at 67kg (..whatever that is :p) and the winner of Deep's 2007 Future King Tournament. A career-recap mentioning that and what you said would make at least a few sections, which is basically how I wrote [[Jung Chan Sung]], and I think most would agree something like that is ''far'' prefered to just the record. --[[User:aktsu|<font color="black"><b>aktsu</b></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:aktsu|t]]&nbsp;/&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Aktsu|c]])</sup> 00:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

283863 +++$+++ Cobenobo +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-06 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.236406560E09 +++$+++ As of now, I'm trying to deactivate my account, so can you remove all or your comments on my talk page. Thanks. I don't want anything appearing on my talk page anymore. Thanks. By the way, do you know how I can deactivate my account? +++$+++ As of now, I'm trying to deactivate my account, so can you remove all or your comments on my talk page. Thanks. I don't want anything appearing on my talk page anymore. Thanks. By the way, do you know how I can deactivate my account?[[User:Cobenobo|Cobenobo]] ([[User talk:Cobenobo|talk]]) 22:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
283864 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283863 +++$+++ 283863 +++$+++ 2009-03-07 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.236418500E09 +++$+++ (Addressed at [[WP:AN]]). -- +++$+++ :(Addressed at [[WP:AN]]). --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 01:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

283865 +++$+++ Sssoul +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283865 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-19 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.237475880E09 +++$+++ thanks for chiming in on the [[Pop music]] talk page about that recently recurring \"personal-essay-like\" insertion - it's good to know i'm not alone.  +++$+++ thanks for chiming in on the [[Pop music]] talk page about that recently recurring "personal-essay-like" insertion - it's good to know i'm not alone. [[User:Sssoul|Sssoul]] ([[User talk:Sssoul|talk]]) 08:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
283866 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283865 +++$+++ 283865 +++$+++ 2009-03-19 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.237486500E09 +++$+++ No problem :) -- +++$+++ :No problem :) --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 11:15, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

21722 +++$+++ aktsu +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21722 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-16 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.253143260E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For improving the coverage of MMA on Wikipedia since August 2008 :) -- +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For improving the coverage of MMA on Wikipedia since August 2008 :) --[[User:aktsu|<font color="black"><b>aktsu</b></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:aktsu|t]]&nbsp;/&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Aktsu|c]])</sup> 16:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
21723 +++$+++ aktsu +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21722 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.253143260E09 +++$+++ Here's hoping I didn't miss any MMA-related edits before your edit to [[Akihiro Gono]] on August 16, 2008 :) Thanks for sticking around and especially for improving the coverage of some of the lesser-known fighters; it hasn't gone unnoticed and is much appreciated. While it would be disingenuous for me not to mention I still prefer content-volume over article-volume I understand that might not be up everybody's alley and as we're all volunteers any work done is of course appreciated :) Keep it up and let me know if you need any help! -- +++$+++ :*Here's hoping I didn't miss any MMA-related edits before your edit to [[Akihiro Gono]] on August 16, 2008 :) Thanks for sticking around and especially for improving the coverage of some of the lesser-known fighters; it hasn't gone unnoticed and is much appreciated. While it would be disingenuous for me not to mention I still prefer content-volume over article-volume I understand that might not be up everybody's alley and as we're all volunteers any work done is of course appreciated :) Keep it up and let me know if you need any help! --[[User:aktsu|<font color="black"><b>aktsu</b></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:aktsu|t]]&nbsp;/&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Aktsu|c]])</sup> 16:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

283867 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283867 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-07 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.241749500E09 +++$+++ The [[Talk:Neverwinter Nights 2\/GA1|Good Article review]] for [[Neverwinter Nights 2]] has begun!  There is some work to do, but overall it looks like we're in good shape.  +++$+++ The [[Talk:Neverwinter Nights 2/GA1|Good Article review]] for [[Neverwinter Nights 2]] has begun!  There is some work to do, but overall it looks like we're in good shape. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 19:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
283868 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283867 +++$+++ 283867 +++$+++ 2009-05-08 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.241779980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know, I'll take a look when I get a moment. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know, I'll take a look when I get a moment. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 03:53, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

283869 +++$+++ PSWG1920 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283869 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-17 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.242549300E09 +++$+++ Hello Muchness. Pruning through the history of [[Wikipedia:External links]], I found [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:External_links&diff=41482478&oldid=40784237 this edit] by you from over three years ago. Part of the exception you added to that criterion is now gone. It appears to me, as I attempted to explain at [[Wikipedia_talk:External_links#Proposed_ELNO_.232_exception]], that over time, due to multiple reorganizations, your clause was lost pretty much by accident. However, observation suggests that it still largely applies in practice. But editors are refusing to accept its reinstatement in [[WP:ELNO]].  +++$+++ Hello Muchness. Pruning through the history of [[Wikipedia:External links]], I found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:External_links&diff=41482478&oldid=40784237 this edit] by you from over three years ago. Part of the exception you added to that criterion is now gone. It appears to me, as I attempted to explain at [[Wikipedia_talk:External_links#Proposed_ELNO_.232_exception]], that over time, due to multiple reorganizations, your clause was lost pretty much by accident. However, observation suggests that it still largely applies in practice. But editors are refusing to accept its reinstatement in [[WP:ELNO]]. [[User:PSWG1920|PSWG1920]] ([[User talk:PSWG1920|talk]]) 01:35, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
283870 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283869 +++$+++ 283869 +++$+++ 2009-05-17 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.242558060E09 +++$+++ Gosh, that was so long ago I don't recall the specifics behind my edit; the related discussion is at [[Wikipedia talk:External links\/Archive 2#The following is ridiculously strict and I will remove it]]. Consensus and guidelines evolve over time and wording that was applicable in 2006 may no longer be applicable now, three years later. I actually don't agree with the wording I added back then (\"a notable proponent of a point of view in an article with multiple points of view\"), it just leaves the door open for too many marginal POV-pushing websites. I think the current, stricter wording is preferable, bearing in mind that WP:EL is only a guideline and consensus on a given article's talk page may determine that it's appropriate to [[WP:IAR|ignore]] the guideline in that specific case. -- +++$+++ :Gosh, that was so long ago I don't recall the specifics behind my edit; the related discussion is at [[Wikipedia talk:External links/Archive 2#The following is ridiculously strict and I will remove it]]. Consensus and guidelines evolve over time and wording that was applicable in 2006 may no longer be applicable now, three years later. I actually don't agree with the wording I added back then ("a notable proponent of a point of view in an article with multiple points of view"), it just leaves the door open for too many marginal POV-pushing websites. I think the current, stricter wording is preferable, bearing in mind that WP:EL is only a guideline and consensus on a given article's talk page may determine that it's appropriate to [[WP:IAR|ignore]] the guideline in that specific case. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 04:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

283871 +++$+++ Enviroboy +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283871 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-30 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.246377060E09 +++$+++ Just letting you know that an anon removed your PROD tag. <span style=\"font-variant:small-caps\"> +++$+++ Just letting you know that an anon removed your PROD tag. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Enviroboy|Enviroboy]]</span><sup>[[User talk:Enviroboy|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[special:contributions/Enviroboy|Cs]]</sub> 08:51, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
283872 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283871 +++$+++ 283871 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 10:13:00 +++$+++ 1.246381980E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know. If the article gets de-prodded again I'll take it to AFD; it doesn't look like a straightforward hoax, so an AFD discussion couldn't hurt. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know. If the article gets de-prodded again I'll take it to AFD; it doesn't look like a straightforward hoax, so an AFD discussion couldn't hurt. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 10:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

283873 +++$+++ BOZ +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-03 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.252006080E09 +++$+++ Hey there! Since you participated in getting ''[[Book of Vile Darkness]]'' up to GA status way back when, I'm letting you know about [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons#Book of Vile Darkness|this thread]]. :) Help out if you get a chance!  The D&D project is now at 21 GAs and 4 FAs, and we've been working hard all year to improve the articles under our project.  +++$+++ Hey there! Since you participated in getting ''[[Book of Vile Darkness]]'' up to GA status way back when, I'm letting you know about [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons#Book of Vile Darkness|this thread]]. :) Help out if you get a chance!  The D&D project is now at 21 GAs and 4 FAs, and we've been working hard all year to improve the articles under our project. [[User:BOZ|BOZ]] ([[User talk:BOZ|talk]]) 12:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
283874 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283873 +++$+++ 283873 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 13:27:00 +++$+++ 1.252960020E09 +++$+++ Thanks for letting me know, and sorry about the late reply. -- +++$+++ :Thanks for letting me know, and sorry about the late reply. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

283875 +++$+++ TrueColour +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-27 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.256695080E09 +++$+++ To comply with the request to start an RfC, I did that. See [[Talk:Districts of Portugal#RfC]]. Correct procedure is important to me.  +++$+++ To comply with the request to start an RfC, I did that. See [[Talk:Districts of Portugal#RfC]]. Correct procedure is important to me. [[User:TrueColour|TrueColour]] ([[User talk:TrueColour|talk]]) 18:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
283876 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283875 +++$+++ 283875 +++$+++ 2009-10-27 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.256695380E09 +++$+++ I don't know about \"correct\" procedure, I was just expressing an opinion about how I felt the situation might have been handled with more consideration for the editors who objected to your initial moves. At any rate, hopefully the RfC will resolve the matter amicably and to the satisfaction of interested parties. Regards. -- +++$+++ :I don't know about "correct" procedure, I was just expressing an opinion about how I felt the situation might have been handled with more consideration for the editors who objected to your initial moves. At any rate, hopefully the RfC will resolve the matter amicably and to the satisfaction of interested parties. Regards. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 19:03, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

21733 +++$+++ Courcelles +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-19 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.276997460E09 +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice -->  +++$+++ If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 18:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
21734 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21733 +++$+++ 21733 +++$+++ 2011-01-24 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.295933460E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 21:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

283878 +++$+++ Epeefleche +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283878 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-17 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.258513980E09 +++$+++ If you are nom the band, might you not want to also fold in a nom for [[Engine - Live As Yer Like (Video)]] (as well as its two albums)?-- +++$+++ If you are nom the band, might you not want to also fold in a nom for [[Engine - Live As Yer Like (Video)]] (as well as its two albums)?--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 19:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
283879 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283878 +++$+++ 283878 +++$+++ 2009-11-17 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.258530660E09 +++$+++ May as well see how the AFD goes before looking at nomming these articles. -- +++$+++ :May as well see how the AFD goes before looking at nomming these articles. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 23:51, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

21735 +++$+++ Kgorman-ucb +++$+++ Sepulwiki +++$+++ 21735 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-14 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310644140E09 +++$+++ FYI, [[K-1 Rumble of the Kings Qualification 2009 Malm\xf6]] is up at AfD.  I'm not the nominator, but it looks like the nom failed to inform you and I figured you might like to know.  +++$+++ FYI, [[K-1 Rumble of the Kings Qualification 2009 Malmö]] is up at AfD.  I'm not the nominator, but it looks like the nom failed to inform you and I figured you might like to know. [[User:Kgorman-ucb|Kevin]] ([[User talk:Kgorman-ucb|talk]]) 04:49, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
21736 +++$+++ Lajbi +++$+++ Dencod16 +++$+++ 21735 +++$+++ 21735 +++$+++ 2011-03-25 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.301112480E09 +++$+++ Read [http:\/\/www.atpworldtour.com\/~\/media\/E60FB992CF9B4C86B448BC8268EA736E.ashx this] [[User:Lajbi|'''<font face=\"Lucida handwriting\" color=\"#78866B\">Lajbi<\/font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Lajbi|'''<font color=\"#C3B091\">Holla @ me<\/font>''']]<small> \u2022  +++$+++ :Read [http://www.atpworldtour.com/~/media/E60FB992CF9B4C86B448BC8268EA736E.ashx this] [[User:Lajbi|'''<font face="Lucida handwriting" color="#78866B">Lajbi</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Lajbi|'''<font color="#C3B091">Holla @ me</font>''']]<small> • [[User:Lajbi/Current project|'''<font color="#808000">CP</font>''']]</small></sup> 21:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

283880 +++$+++ Mhkay +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283880 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-18 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.258599840E09 +++$+++ I've added some discussion of recent changes to the [[Comma splice]] page at [[Talk:Comma_splice#The_Buckley_Addition]]. I would appreciate your comments.  +++$+++ I've added some discussion of recent changes to the [[Comma splice]] page at [[Talk:Comma_splice#The_Buckley_Addition]]. I would appreciate your comments. [[User:Mhkay|Mhkay]] ([[User talk:Mhkay|talk]]) 19:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
283881 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283880 +++$+++ 283880 +++$+++ 2009-11-19 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.258618440E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the heads up, I'll add my thoughts there. -- +++$+++ :Thank you for the heads up, I'll add my thoughts there. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 00:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

21737 +++$+++ Kante4 +++$+++ Dencod16 +++$+++ 21737 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-28 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.301340420E09 +++$+++ Hey, good job on creating the articles. I fixed things to make it look like every other tennis article on wikipedia so please take a look and copy\/paste it for the next tournaments. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hey, good job on creating the articles. I fixed things to make it look like every other tennis article on wikipedia so please take a look and copy/paste it for the next tournaments. Thanks. [[User:Kante4|Kante4]] ([[User talk:Kante4|talk]]) 12:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
21738 +++$+++ Kante4 +++$+++ Dencod16 +++$+++ 21737 +++$+++ 21737 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.301512200E09 +++$+++ I copied\/paste it from the original listing, did not change anything.  +++$+++ :I copied/paste it from the original listing, did not change anything. [[User:Kante4|Kante4]] ([[User talk:Kante4|talk]]) 12:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
21739 +++$+++ Kante4 +++$+++ Dencod16 +++$+++ 21737 +++$+++ 21738 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.301551860E09 +++$+++ Was a mistake then, sorry for that.  +++$+++ ::Was a mistake then, sorry for that. [[User:Kante4|Kante4]] ([[User talk:Kante4|talk]]) 23:11, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

283882 +++$+++ JohnCD +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283882 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-25 22:45:00 +++$+++ 1.259217900E09 +++$+++ Sorry to have been slow to reply to your note yesterday. I was thinking of saying, let's just let them moulder quietly till the Engine question gets settled, but I have no quarrel with your taking them AfD. I doubt whether they have the independent notability for their own articles, even if Engine scrapes through, though I see that [[Live At Kent 1988]] does include two other notable bands. Regards,  +++$+++ Sorry to have been slow to reply to your note yesterday. I was thinking of saying, let's just let them moulder quietly till the Engine question gets settled, but I have no quarrel with your taking them AfD. I doubt whether they have the independent notability for their own articles, even if Engine scrapes through, though I see that [[Live At Kent 1988]] does include two other notable bands. Regards, [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 22:45, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
283883 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283882 +++$+++ 283882 +++$+++ 2009-11-26 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.259276640E09 +++$+++ No problem, thanks and leaving them be in the meantime might have been the best option. At any rate, there doesn't seem any harm in letting this AFD run its (probably inevitable) course. -- +++$+++ :No problem, thanks and leaving them be in the meantime might have been the best option. At any rate, there doesn't seem any harm in letting this AFD run its (probably inevitable) course. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 15:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

283884 +++$+++ LadyofShalott +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-11 20:36:00 +++$+++ 1.260592560E09 +++$+++ I had to undo your prod - I had already prodded the article, and the creator contested it (perfectly within his rights). Once deprodded, it can't be done again. <font face=\"Old English Text MT\"> +++$+++ I had to undo your prod - I had already prodded the article, and the creator contested it (perfectly within his rights). Once deprodded, it can't be done again. <font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:LadyofShalott|<font color="#ee3399">Lady</font>]]<font color="#0095c6">of</font>[[User_Talk:LadyofShalott|<font color="#442288">Shalott</font>]]</font> 20:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
283885 +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ Muchness +++$+++ 283884 +++$+++ 283884 +++$+++ 2009-12-11 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.260592620E09 +++$+++ Yes sorry, I just noticed it had been previously de-prodded after I'd added the prod. Will AFD instead. -- +++$+++ :Yes sorry, I just noticed it had been previously de-prodded after I'd added the prod. Will AFD instead. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] ([[User talk:Muchness#top|talk]]) 20:37, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

283886 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283886 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-22 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.177268400E09 +++$+++ --  +++$+++ -- [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] 12:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
283887 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283886 +++$+++ 283886 +++$+++ 2007-04-23 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.177367220E09 +++$+++ Thank for you kind welcome. I did not jump straight in, as the [[John Bowe (motor racing)]] piece needs to be extensively re-written along accuracy lines, as does I note [[Peter Brock]] and [[Jim Richards (race driver)]]. The Richards piece in particular is potenetially libellous. Needs more time than a simple edit. +++$+++ : Thank for you kind welcome. I did not jump straight in, as the [[John Bowe (motor racing)]] piece needs to be extensively re-written along accuracy lines, as does I note [[Peter Brock]] and [[Jim Richards (race driver)]]. The Richards piece in particular is potenetially libellous. Needs more time than a simple edit.[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 15:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

546032 +++$+++ 93.131.27.246 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-24 04:45:00 +++$+++ 1.248435900E09 +++$+++ In german law you call this kind of decision \"Provisional order\", i would call [[The wrong version]]-decision a unbrave \"blind order\". [[Special:Contributions\/93.131.27.246|93.131.27.246]] ( +++$+++ In german law you call this kind of decision "Provisional order", i would call [[The wrong version]]-decision a unbrave "blind order". [[Special:Contributions/93.131.27.246|93.131.27.246]] ([[User talk:93.131.27.246|talk]]) 04:45, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
546033 +++$+++ Roman888 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546032 +++$+++ 546032 +++$+++ 2009-07-24 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.248494040E09 +++$+++ So I gather from that article that you admit that you made a mistake and should apologise to everyone.  You did not consider the other option of reporting that anonymous user using [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard\/Edit warring]] thus making people more frustrated.  +++$+++ : So I gather from that article that you admit that you made a mistake and should apologise to everyone.  You did not consider the other option of reporting that anonymous user using [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] thus making people more frustrated. [[User:Roman888|Roman888]] ([[User talk:Roman888|talk]]) 20:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

283889 +++$+++ GTHO +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-16 00:16:00 +++$+++ 1.181978160E09 +++$+++ Thanks for adding the extra info to these results. I notice that you don't quote a source. Where did the DNF info come from? I'm not doubting you, I'm just interested.  +++$+++ Thanks for adding the extra info to these results. I notice that you don't quote a source. Where did the DNF info come from? I'm not doubting you, I'm just interested. [[User:GTHO|GTHO]] 00:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
283890 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283889 +++$+++ 283889 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.181979780E09 +++$+++ Motorsport Statistics is what I do. Came out of the files. 1990... probably originally came from the October 1990 issue of Racing Car News. -- +++$+++ :Motorsport Statistics is what I do. Came out of the files. 1990... probably originally came from the October 1990 issue of Racing Car News. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 00:43, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

546034 +++$+++ FHessel +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546034 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-24 13:40:00 +++$+++ 1.248468000E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:FHessel|FHessel]] ([[User talk:FHessel|talk]]) 13:40, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
546035 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546034 +++$+++ 546034 +++$+++ 2009-07-24 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.248479340E09 +++$+++ I've now closed the RfC, since the consensus now seems clear. For the record, my decision to protect rather than block came from seeing the the IP editor's position had significant support on the talk page, so I felt that forcing people to come to a decision through discussion would improve the stability of the page. The edit warring here was a symptom of a wider problem.  +++$+++ :I've now closed the RfC, since the consensus now seems clear. For the record, my decision to protect rather than block came from seeing the the IP editor's position had significant support on the talk page, so I felt that forcing people to come to a decision through discussion would improve the stability of the page. The edit warring here was a symptom of a wider problem. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 16:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
546036 +++$+++ FHessel +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546034 +++$+++ 546035 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.248545100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:FHessel|FHessel]] ([[User talk:FHessel|talk]]) 11:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
546037 +++$+++ FHessel +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546034 +++$+++ 546036 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.248712680E09 +++$+++ And there is no comment form your side, Tim, except \"ever read the 'Wrong version'\"?? I'd expected a bit more.  +++$+++ :::And there is no comment form your side, Tim, except "ever read the 'Wrong version'"?? I'd expected a bit more. [[User:FHessel|FHessel]] ([[User talk:FHessel|talk]]) 09:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

283892 +++$+++ Muitint78 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-31 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.188548040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Muitint78|User:Muitint78    www.57racer.page.tl]] 01:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
283893 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283892 +++$+++ 283892 +++$+++ 2007-08-31 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.188550140E09 +++$+++ Essentially that's it. The project page isn't as active as I would like it to be. There are though a few projects I'd like to push towards the group, a few important pages that need work, this would be the best place to push for it. -- +++$+++ :Essentially that's it. The project page isn't as active as I would like it to be. There are though a few projects I'd like to push towards the group, a few important pages that need work, this would be the best place to push for it. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 01:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

283894 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283894 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-05 02:55:00 +++$+++ 1.188986100E09 +++$+++ Hi Falcadore. Sorry. It looks like we crossed edits on [[Leanne Tander]]. I'll leave it alone for the moment. I suggest removing the copyvio.  +++$+++ Hi Falcadore. Sorry. It looks like we crossed edits on [[Leanne Tander]]. I'll leave it alone for the moment. I suggest removing the copyvio. [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] 02:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
283895 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283894 +++$+++ 283894 +++$+++ 2007-09-05 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.188986220E09 +++$+++ heh yeah - although a query - copyvio? Jargon is the enemy of communication so as Pauline Hanson says - please explain. -- +++$+++ :heh yeah - although a query - copyvio? Jargon is the enemy of communication so as Pauline Hanson says - please explain. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 02:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
283896 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283894 +++$+++ 283895 +++$+++ 2007-09-05 02:59:00 +++$+++ 1.188986340E09 +++$+++ Ah, sorry: copyvio = copyright violation. Often abbreviated to \"copyvio\" because that's the name of the shortcut to the relevant Wikipedia policy page: [[WP:COPYVIO]].  +++$+++ ::Ah, sorry: copyvio = copyright violation. Often abbreviated to "copyvio" because that's the name of the shortcut to the relevant Wikipedia policy page: [[WP:COPYVIO]]. [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] 02:59, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
283897 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283894 +++$+++ 283896 +++$+++ 2007-09-05 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.188986700E09 +++$+++ Should an appropriate annotation go on the Leanne Tander page or the discussion page? -- +++$+++ :::Should an appropriate annotation go on the Leanne Tander page or the discussion page? --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 03:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
283898 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283894 +++$+++ 283897 +++$+++ 2007-09-05 03:10:00 +++$+++ 1.188987000E09 +++$+++ I see you've mentioned the copyright violation on the article's talk page and also on the talk page of the editor who added it. That should be enough for now. If that editor doesn't remove or substantially modify the text within, say, the next 24 hours, then one of us can just remove it. P.S. Thanks for your comment on my talk page.  +++$+++ ::::I see you've mentioned the copyright violation on the article's talk page and also on the talk page of the editor who added it. That should be enough for now. If that editor doesn't remove or substantially modify the text within, say, the next 24 hours, then one of us can just remove it. P.S. Thanks for your comment on my talk page. [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] 03:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
283899 +++$+++ Kpaspery +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283894 +++$+++ 283898 +++$+++ 2007-09-06 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.189072380E09 +++$+++ Im confused. Whats the copyright violation on the page? Is it the article on 2007? -- +++$+++ :::::Im confused. Whats the copyright violation on the page? Is it the article on 2007? --[[User:Kpaspery|Kpaspery]] 02:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
283900 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283894 +++$+++ 283899 +++$+++ 2007-09-06 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.189072800E09 +++$+++ Yes. Strongly suspected. Refer the Leanne Tander discussion page. -- +++$+++ ::::::Yes. Strongly suspected. Refer the Leanne Tander discussion page. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 03:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
283901 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283894 +++$+++ 283900 +++$+++ 2007-09-06 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.189073880E09 +++$+++ I've deleted the offending section.  +++$+++ :::::::I've deleted the offending section. [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] 03:18, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

546044 +++$+++ ClueBot Commons +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-01 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.249110900E09 +++$+++ As you requested [[User talk:Cobi\/Archives\/2009\/June#RfA|here]], this is a note letting you know that I will be running for adminship when [[User:Prodego|Prodego]] and anyone else who wishes to co-nominate me writes up their nomination statement.  If you still wish to co-nominate me, you may do so by adding your co-nomination statement to [[User:Cobi\/RfAsand]].  Thanks.  -- [[User:Cobi|Cobi]]<sup>([[User talk:Cobi|t]]|[[Special:Contributions\/Cobi|c]]| +++$+++ As you requested [[User talk:Cobi/Archives/2009/June#RfA|here]], this is a note letting you know that I will be running for adminship when [[User:Prodego|Prodego]] and anyone else who wishes to co-nominate me writes up their nomination statement.  If you still wish to co-nominate me, you may do so by adding your co-nomination statement to [[User:Cobi/RfAsand]].  Thanks.  -- [[User:Cobi|Cobi]]<sup>([[User talk:Cobi|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cobi|c]]|[[User:ClueBot Commons/Bots|b]])</sup> 00:15, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
546045 +++$+++ ClueBot Commons +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546044 +++$+++ 546044 +++$+++ 2009-08-03 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.249295280E09 +++$+++ Having waited two days, I'm going to go ahead and transclude it.  Feel free to add your co-nomination statement even after it's transcluded if you want.  :)  -- [[User:Cobi|Cobi]]<sup>([[User talk:Cobi|t]]|[[Special:Contributions\/Cobi|c]]| +++$+++ :Having waited two days, I'm going to go ahead and transclude it.  Feel free to add your co-nomination statement even after it's transcluded if you want.  :)  -- [[User:Cobi|Cobi]]<sup>([[User talk:Cobi|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cobi|c]]|[[User:ClueBot Commons/Bots|b]])</sup> 03:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

283902 +++$+++ Marcusaurelius161 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283902 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-14 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.189809660E09 +++$+++ cheers,  +++$+++ cheers, [[User:Marcusaurelius161|Marcusaurelius161]] 15:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
283903 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283902 +++$+++ 283902 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.189843620E09 +++$+++ That something like what you were after? -- +++$+++ :That something like what you were after? --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 01:07, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
283904 +++$+++ Marcusaurelius161 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283902 +++$+++ 283903 +++$+++ 2007-09-15 06:09:00 +++$+++ 1.189861740E09 +++$+++ Yes, thanks Falcadore, for the additional info and Morris\u2019s date of birth. The article now gives a pretty good overview of his career. And his father Ray now gets a mention; as he should.  +++$+++ ::Yes, thanks Falcadore, for the additional info and Morris’s date of birth. The article now gives a pretty good overview of his career. And his father Ray now gets a mention; as he should. [[User:Marcusaurelius161|Marcusaurelius161]] 06:09, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

178389 +++$+++ Dabomb87 +++$+++ Chensiyuan +++$+++ 178389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-27 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.254113700E09 +++$+++ What do you think about his chances for FAC?  +++$+++ What do you think about his chances for FAC? [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 21:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
178390 +++$+++ Chensiyuan +++$+++ Chensiyuan +++$+++ 178389 +++$+++ 178389 +++$+++ 2009-09-27 22:10:00 +++$+++ 1.254114600E09 +++$+++ Not particularly great for now: prose needs substantial polish, and content could have more depth.  +++$+++ :Not particularly great for now: prose needs substantial polish, and content could have more depth. [[User:Chensiyuan|Chensiyuan]] ([[User talk:Chensiyuan#top|talk]]) 22:10, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

546049 +++$+++  +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-15 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.250388360E09 +++$+++ Using the \"Search inside this book\" feature that is enabled for Rector-Page and Goldstein, no pages discussing \"SOD\/CAT\" are returned in searches of either reference. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ Using the "Search inside this book" feature that is enabled for Rector-Page and Goldstein, no pages discussing "SOD/CAT" are returned in searches of either reference. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
546050 +++$+++ Robert Kavanaugh +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546049 +++$+++ 546049 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.250393700E09 +++$+++ Please see comment below your entry.  +++$+++ :Please see comment below your entry. [[User:Robert Kavanaugh| RGK]] ([[User talk:Robert Kavanaugh|talk]]) 20:35, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
546051 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546049 +++$+++ 546050 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.250393820E09 +++$+++ These products all appear to be sold as different things, however true that claim may be (I suspect they are all the same expensive little pills with different labels), you can't use a reference to one product to support the notability of another.  +++$+++ ::These products all appear to be sold as different things, however true that claim may be (I suspect they are all the same expensive little pills with different labels), you can't use a reference to one product to support the notability of another. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 20:37, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
546052 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546049 +++$+++ 546050 +++$+++ 2009-08-15 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.250401380E09 +++$+++ there were also comments about this on my talk page. For my response, see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&diff=308201691&oldid=308194488]. ''' +++$+++ ::there were also comments about this on my talk page. For my response, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&diff=308201691&oldid=308194488]. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 22:43, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
546053 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546049 +++$+++ 546052 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.250427960E09 +++$+++ For the record, my only professional interests are in the [[Neglected diseases|forgotten diseases of forgotten people]].  +++$+++ :::For the record, my only professional interests are in the [[Neglected diseases|forgotten diseases of forgotten people]]. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 06:06, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
546054 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546049 +++$+++ 546053 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 06:37:00 +++$+++ 1.250429820E09 +++$+++ Still, Tim, think about it. One of interesting aspects of Wikipedia is that it provides an up-close-and-personal view of the sorts of scientific-sounding nonsense used to bamboozle the unsophisticated health-care consumer. I guess what I'm saying is, if you ever want to collaborate on a diet\/health paperback and retire early, let me know. I think we could come up with something that would make ''[[Blood type diet|Eat Right 4 Your Blood Type]]'' look like the Proceedings of the Royal Society. ''' +++$+++ ::::Still, Tim, think about it. One of interesting aspects of Wikipedia is that it provides an up-close-and-personal view of the sorts of scientific-sounding nonsense used to bamboozle the unsophisticated health-care consumer. I guess what I'm saying is, if you ever want to collaborate on a diet/health paperback and retire early, let me know. I think we could come up with something that would make ''[[Blood type diet|Eat Right 4 Your Blood Type]]'' look like the Proceedings of the Royal Society. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 06:37, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
546055 +++$+++ 71.105.255.183 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546049 +++$+++ 546054 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 08:12:00 +++$+++ 1.250435520E09 +++$+++ In its modern usage, '''hubris''' denotes overconfident pride and arrogance; it is often associated with a lack of humility, not always with the lack of knowledge. [[Special:Contributions\/71.105.255.183|71.105.255.183]] ( +++$+++ :::::In its modern usage, '''hubris''' denotes overconfident pride and arrogance; it is often associated with a lack of humility, not always with the lack of knowledge. [[Special:Contributions/71.105.255.183|71.105.255.183]] ([[User talk:71.105.255.183|talk]]) 08:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
546056 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546049 +++$+++ 546055 +++$+++ 2009-08-16 22:56:00 +++$+++ 1.250488560E09 +++$+++ That contribution may be more appropriate for [[Wiktionary]]. ''' +++$+++ ::::::That contribution may be more appropriate for [[Wiktionary]]. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 22:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

283907 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283907 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-10 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.192085400E09 +++$+++ The video of the kangaroo dodging cars at the event this past weekend is all over the American news media. I bet I saw the video 7 times, and it's currently available for viewing on yahoo's homepage ([http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/wcvb\/20071009\/lo_wcvb\/14298506 related story]). The incident should be integrated somewhere into the V8 Supercar pages since it received very much press worldwide. I saw it on several national morning shows this morning. I have never seen the V8 series on American television before this.  +++$+++ The video of the kangaroo dodging cars at the event this past weekend is all over the American news media. I bet I saw the video 7 times, and it's currently available for viewing on yahoo's homepage ([http://news.yahoo.com/s/wcvb/20071009/lo_wcvb/14298506 related story]). The incident should be integrated somewhere into the V8 Supercar pages since it received very much press worldwide. I saw it on several national morning shows this morning. I have never seen the V8 series on American television before this. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 23:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
283908 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283907 +++$+++ 283907 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.192095840E09 +++$+++ Problem is, the kangaroo incident occured during a support race, V8Supercar's equivalent of the NASCAR Busch series, and as such has no article relating to it. I'm open to suggestions, and as I'm not well versed on the technical side I'm not sure how to best exploit it. Putting a link to the U-Tube page is easy enough, but do you have any other suggestions? -- +++$+++ :Problem is, the kangaroo incident occured during a support race, V8Supercar's equivalent of the NASCAR Busch series, and as such has no article relating to it. I'm open to suggestions, and as I'm not well versed on the technical side I'm not sure how to best exploit it. Putting a link to the U-Tube page is easy enough, but do you have any other suggestions? --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 02:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
283909 +++$+++ Royalbroil +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283907 +++$+++ 283908 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 03:53:00 +++$+++ 1.192099980E09 +++$+++ Oh, the media said it was in a V8 Super race. I would not use the fact then. Otherwise, why don't you write an article about the support series, and add the fact there? It should be notable as long as it's a country-wide or possibly a statewide series.  +++$+++ ::Oh, the media said it was in a V8 Super race. I would not use the fact then. Otherwise, why don't you write an article about the support series, and add the fact there? It should be notable as long as it's a country-wide or possibly a statewide series. [[User:Royalbroil|<font color="#000000">'''Royal'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''broil'''</font>]] 03:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
283910 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283907 +++$+++ 283909 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.192114260E09 +++$+++ Yes it was a V8Supercar race, in so far that any Busch series race is a NASCAR race. If you look at the 2006 Bathurst page there is a long entry on something that happened in a support event, I was just after some ideas. -- +++$+++ :::Yes it was a V8Supercar race, in so far that any Busch series race is a NASCAR race. If you look at the 2006 Bathurst page there is a long entry on something that happened in a support event, I was just after some ideas. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 07:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

21765 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Bachrach44 +++$+++ 21765 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-12 00:07:00 +++$+++ 1.223795220E09 +++$+++ Would be useful if you activated email, so I can send you a message. If you prefer not to activate email, just drop me a message by [[Special:Emailuser\/Jfdwolff]].  +++$+++ Would be useful if you activated email, so I can send you a message. If you prefer not to activate email, just drop me a message by [[Special:Emailuser/Jfdwolff]]. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 00:07, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
21766 +++$+++ Jfdwolff +++$+++ Bachrach44 +++$+++ 21765 +++$+++ 21765 +++$+++ 2008-10-12 09:31:00 +++$+++ 1.223829060E09 +++$+++ Fine, in the interest of openness could I suggest you have a look at recent edits to [[Kashrut]] and [[Kosher foods]]?  +++$+++ :Fine, in the interest of openness could I suggest you have a look at recent edits to [[Kashrut]] and [[Kosher foods]]? [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 09:31, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

283912 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283912 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 08:13:00 +++$+++ 1.193757180E09 +++$+++ This page should be deleted, there already is a page on Superkarts, ity does not need a second. -- +++$+++ This page should be deleted, there already is a page on Superkarts, ity does not need a second. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 08:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
283913 +++$+++ Miranda +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283912 +++$+++ 283912 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 08:19:00 +++$+++ 1.193757540E09 +++$+++ This article lacks references and contains no sources. My suggestion to you would be to [[WP:REF|include sources]], make it less [[WP:OR|original researchy]], and [[WP:NPOV|more expandable]] to the subject.  I will check back in a week, and if the article contains the same issues, I will nominate for [[WP:AFD|Afd]].  +++$+++ :This article lacks references and contains no sources. My suggestion to you would be to [[WP:REF|include sources]], make it less [[WP:OR|original researchy]], and [[WP:NPOV|more expandable]] to the subject.  I will check back in a week, and if the article contains the same issues, I will nominate for [[WP:AFD|Afd]]. [[User:Miranda|Miranda]] 08:19, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
283914 +++$+++ Miranda +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283912 +++$+++ 283913 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 08:22:00 +++$+++ 1.193757720E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I read over it, and it reads like an essay, and I am nominating it for deletion in five days. My suggestion to you is to either use information that you researched to improve the [[Superkart]] article.  +++$+++ ::Sorry, I read over it, and it reads like an essay, and I am nominating it for deletion in five days. My suggestion to you is to either use information that you researched to improve the [[Superkart]] article. [[User:Miranda|Miranda]] 08:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
283915 +++$+++ Miranda +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283912 +++$+++ 283914 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.193758020E09 +++$+++ I am sorry, got confused on who created this article. :-\/ Apologies?  +++$+++ :::I am sorry, got confused on who created this article. :-/ Apologies? [[User:Miranda|Miranda]] 08:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
283916 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283912 +++$+++ 283915 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.193758200E09 +++$+++ No worries. No harm, no foul, we both want the same thing but for different complimentary reasons. -- +++$+++ ::::No worries. No harm, no foul, we both want the same thing but for different complimentary reasons. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 08:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
283917 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283912 +++$+++ 283916 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.193758680E09 +++$+++ By the way - should the advertising criteria be enough to whack a speedy deletion tag on the duplicate article [[Green motorsport]] too? -- +++$+++ :::::By the way - should the advertising criteria be enough to whack a speedy deletion tag on the duplicate article [[Green motorsport]] too? --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 08:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

546057 +++$+++ Leyo +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546057 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-17 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.250551260E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim. Can you please upload a new version with a higher resolution? -- +++$+++ Hi Tim. Can you please upload a new version with a higher resolution? --[[User:Leyo|Leyo]] 16:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
546058 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546057 +++$+++ 546057 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.250552640E09 +++$+++ Sure, easy enough.  +++$+++ :Sure, easy enough. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 16:44, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
546059 +++$+++ Leyo +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546057 +++$+++ 546058 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.250554080E09 +++$+++ Thanks in advance. Please remove the dispute template after having uploaded the new version. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks in advance. Please remove the dispute template after having uploaded the new version. --[[User:Leyo|Leyo]] 17:08, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
546060 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546057 +++$+++ 546059 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 16:26:00 +++$+++ 1.250637960E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ :::Done. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 16:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

21770 +++$+++ Spencer +++$+++ Bachrach44 +++$+++ 21770 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-08 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.226143920E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | Keep up your excellent coordinates-addition work- it hasn't gone unnoticed. ''' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Keep up your excellent coordinates-addition work- it hasn't gone unnoticed. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082567">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T♦</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 03:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
21771 +++$+++ Spencer +++$+++ Bachrach44 +++$+++ 21770 +++$+++ 21770 +++$+++ 2008-11-12 22:05:00 +++$+++ 1.226556300E09 +++$+++ No problem. Keep up the great work, ''' +++$+++ :No problem. Keep up the great work, '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082567">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T♦</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 22:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

178391 +++$+++ Chrishomingtang +++$+++ Chensiyuan +++$+++ 178391 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-28 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.254121680E09 +++$+++ Hi, Chensiyuan. I was the one who originally asked this question because I thought this article is a relatively easy target for me to attempt FAC. Since I have never try FAC before as you know, any guidance from you would be greatly appreciated. To start off, are there any particular things you think need to be added? I did a quick research and thought that the article looks pretty comprehensive already.\u2014<font face=\"Cambria\" size=\"3\"> +++$+++ Hi, Chensiyuan. I was the one who originally asked this question because I thought this article is a relatively easy target for me to attempt FAC. Since I have never try FAC before as you know, any guidance from you would be greatly appreciated. To start off, are there any particular things you think need to be added? I did a quick research and thought that the article looks pretty comprehensive already.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishomingtang|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishomingtang|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishomingtang|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 00:08, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
178392 +++$+++ Chensiyuan +++$+++ Chensiyuan +++$+++ 178391 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 00:50:00 +++$+++ 1.254124200E09 +++$+++ Hi, well I'm not that familiar with players from that era, it's just that if you compare the article's scope (say season-by-season coverage) to other NBA FAs like Magic, Jordan, Russell, this seems a little short. It could be his career wasn't as illustrious, but that's the obvious thing that stands out to me.  +++$+++ ::Hi, well I'm not that familiar with players from that era, it's just that if you compare the article's scope (say season-by-season coverage) to other NBA FAs like Magic, Jordan, Russell, this seems a little short. It could be his career wasn't as illustrious, but that's the obvious thing that stands out to me. [[User:Chensiyuan|Chensiyuan]] ([[User talk:Chensiyuan#top|talk]]) 00:50, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

21772 +++$+++ Ynhockey +++$+++ Bachrach44 +++$+++ 21772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-13 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.226627160E09 +++$+++ Hi Bachrach44! It appears that you had some trouble finding the coordinates for [[Ganim]]. Do you need help finding other coordinates? I never really got into adding them for Israeli localities, but would gladly assist you if you run into trouble. Cheers,  +++$+++ Hi Bachrach44! It appears that you had some trouble finding the coordinates for [[Ganim]]. Do you need help finding other coordinates? I never really got into adding them for Israeli localities, but would gladly assist you if you run into trouble. Cheers, [[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] <sup>([[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]])</sup> 17:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
21773 +++$+++ Ynhockey +++$+++ Bachrach44 +++$+++ 21772 +++$+++ 21772 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.226630820E09 +++$+++ I'll do the Jewish localities in the WB now. On a side note, take a look at [http:\/\/www.ynhockey.net\/fwiki\/coords.php]. Cheers,  +++$+++ :I'll do the Jewish localities in the WB now. On a side note, take a look at [http://www.ynhockey.net/fwiki/coords.php]. Cheers, [[User:Ynhockey|Ynhockey]] <sup>([[User talk:Ynhockey|Talk]])</sup> 18:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
21774 +++$+++ Al Ameer son +++$+++ Bachrach44 +++$+++ 21772 +++$+++ 21773 +++$+++ 2008-11-13 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.226643660E09 +++$+++ I ask [[User:Ashley kennedy3|Ashley kennedy3]] for all needed coordinates. She added them to nearly all the articles on Palestinian localities. I'm sure she'll be delighted to add them. -- +++$+++ ::I ask [[User:Ashley kennedy3|Ashley kennedy3]] for all needed coordinates. She added them to nearly all the articles on Palestinian localities. I'm sure she'll be delighted to add them. --[[User:Al Ameer son|Al Ameer son]] ([[User talk:Al Ameer son|talk]]) 22:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

546061 +++$+++ MBisanz +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546061 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-18 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.250603520E09 +++$+++ I was going to send you an annoying template, but figured I would ask first how you know [[:File:TryP cycle.jpg]] is PD-self, since I am fairly certain you aren't the cited party.  ''' +++$+++ I was going to send you an annoying template, but figured I would ask first how you know [[:File:TryP cycle.jpg]] is PD-self, since I am fairly certain you aren't the cited party.  '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 06:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
546062 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546061 +++$+++ 546061 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.250636400E09 +++$+++ That's an image my boss and I made together (Alan was my PhD supervisor), as I remember he contributed the molecular models and I made the powerpoint diagram. I don't think I have the original slide any more, but I could make a new copy.  +++$+++ :That's an image my boss and I made together (Alan was my PhD supervisor), as I remember he contributed the molecular models and I made the powerpoint diagram. I don't think I have the original slide any more, but I could make a new copy. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 16:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
546063 +++$+++ Leyo +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546061 +++$+++ 546062 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.250637840E09 +++$+++ If you do so, please upload it in the PNG or SVG format. The JPG version shows compression artefacts. -- +++$+++ ::If you do so, please upload it in the PNG or SVG format. The JPG version shows compression artefacts. --[[User:Leyo|Leyo]] 16:24, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
546064 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546061 +++$+++ 546063 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.250644980E09 +++$+++ PNG is probably best because of the molecular models. Embedding those in an SVG would make for a huge file and no real quality advantage.  +++$+++ :::PNG is probably best because of the molecular models. Embedding those in an SVG would make for a huge file and no real quality advantage. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 18:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
546065 +++$+++ MBisanz +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546061 +++$+++ 546061 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 07:23:00 +++$+++ 1.250691780E09 +++$+++ Ahh, ok, I understand, thanks for the explanation. ''' +++$+++ :Ahh, ok, I understand, thanks for the explanation. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 07:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

283918 +++$+++ Lady Aleena +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-30 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.193762400E09 +++$+++ Star Trek is in [[List_of_film_decologies_and_larger_series#Undecologies|undecologies]] now. :) -  +++$+++ Star Trek is in [[List_of_film_decologies_and_larger_series#Undecologies|undecologies]] now. :) - [[User:Lady Aleena|LA]] @ 09:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
283919 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283918 +++$+++ 283918 +++$+++ 2007-10-30 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.193762580E09 +++$+++ Noticed after the fact - apologies, will now sit in the corner and be quiet for a while. -- +++$+++ :Noticed after the fact - apologies, will now sit in the corner and be quiet for a while. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 09:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
283920 +++$+++ Lady Aleena +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283918 +++$+++ 283919 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 07:50:00 +++$+++ 1.194015000E09 +++$+++ I removed the link to hexologies and larger since I now moved it to decologies and larger. Hexologies through nonologies now have their own pages.  -  +++$+++ ::I removed the link to hexologies and larger since I now moved it to decologies and larger. Hexologies through nonologies now have their own pages.  - [[User:Lady Aleena|LA]] @ 07:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

91011 +++$+++ Circeus +++$+++ Sasata +++$+++ 91011 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-17 23:53:00 +++$+++ 1.303109580E09 +++$+++ So I've just finished adding all I could, except for Physalacriaceae, Strophariaceae (incl. Hemigasteraceae) and Crepidotaceae (incl. Inocybaceae), for which (as said above) I'm reliant on you to establish lists of genera we are reasonably happy with. If Crepidotaceae ends up above 20 genera or so, I'll make it a separate list.  +++$+++ So I've just finished adding all I could, except for Physalacriaceae, Strophariaceae (incl. Hemigasteraceae) and Crepidotaceae (incl. Inocybaceae), for which (as said above) I'm reliant on you to establish lists of genera we are reasonably happy with. If Crepidotaceae ends up above 20 genera or so, I'll make it a separate list. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 23:53, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
91012 +++$+++ Circeus +++$+++ Sasata +++$+++ 91011 +++$+++ 91011 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 00:15:00 +++$+++ 1.303110900E09 +++$+++ Speaking of your Russulales idea, I'd make it a combined list for families and Genera, or at least consider it as a possibility. However, I notice the article clearly states ''[[Clavicorona]]'' ought to be in the Agaricales, but I can't find a family placement for it (except MycoBank, in the [[Tricholomataceae]], but I don't trust it all that much).  +++$+++ :Speaking of your Russulales idea, I'd make it a combined list for families and Genera, or at least consider it as a possibility. However, I notice the article clearly states ''[[Clavicorona]]'' ought to be in the Agaricales, but I can't find a family placement for it (except MycoBank, in the [[Tricholomataceae]], but I don't trust it all that much). [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 00:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

283925 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-12 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.194897240E09 +++$+++ Hi Falcadore. I notice that you recently added \"Winner of the Australian Grand Prix\" succession boxes to [[Frank Matich]] and [[Graham McRae]]. I'm wondering whether this is a good precedent to set. Because if we have succession boxes for the winners of the Australian Grand Prix, then why not the British GP, and French GP and Monaco GP, etc. See my point? (Just imagine the effect on Michael Schumacher's article!) I've started a [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Motorsport#Succession_boxes_for_winners_of_individual_races|discussion]] on this topic at WP:MOTOR. I thought you may care to participate.  +++$+++ Hi Falcadore. I notice that you recently added "Winner of the Australian Grand Prix" succession boxes to [[Frank Matich]] and [[Graham McRae]]. I'm wondering whether this is a good precedent to set. Because if we have succession boxes for the winners of the Australian Grand Prix, then why not the British GP, and French GP and Monaco GP, etc. See my point? (Just imagine the effect on Michael Schumacher's article!) I've started a [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Motorsport#Succession_boxes_for_winners_of_individual_races|discussion]] on this topic at WP:MOTOR. I thought you may care to participate. [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] 11:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
283926 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283925 +++$+++ 283925 +++$+++ 2007-11-12 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.194937620E09 +++$+++ I only added it to drivers who won Grands Prix from the pre-F1 era, entirely mindful of the facts as you've indicated, and was even further selective as I did not add it to Alan Jones or Roberto Moreno. I was intending to take it no further than I have. -- +++$+++ :I only added it to drivers who won Grands Prix from the pre-F1 era, entirely mindful of the facts as you've indicated, and was even further selective as I did not add it to Alan Jones or Roberto Moreno. I was intending to take it no further than I have. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 23:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
283927 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283925 +++$+++ 283926 +++$+++ 2007-11-13 01:17:00 +++$+++ 1.194945420E09 +++$+++ I should have spotted that. And I probably should have waited for your reply before starting the discussion on WP:MOTOR. Oh well, it's done now. Apologies.  +++$+++ ::I should have spotted that. And I probably should have waited for your reply before starting the discussion on WP:MOTOR. Oh well, it's done now. Apologies. [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] 01:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

546071 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546071 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-26 02:09:00 +++$+++ 1.251277740E09 +++$+++ [[WP:DTTR]] -- +++$+++ [[WP:DTTR]] --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 02:09, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
546072 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546071 +++$+++ 546071 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 03:16:00 +++$+++ 1.251281760E09 +++$+++ And since you don't believe in [[WP:DTTR]]... enjoy! -- +++$+++ :And since you don't believe in [[WP:DTTR]]... enjoy! --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 03:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
546073 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546071 +++$+++ 546072 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.251290580E09 +++$+++ At the risk of receiving a retaliatory template myself, Surturz, you might want to consider modeling the sort of behavior you'd like to see. I can't promise anything, but I think it's more effective than petulant immaturity. ''' +++$+++ ::At the risk of receiving a retaliatory template myself, Surturz, you might want to consider modeling the sort of behavior you'd like to see. I can't promise anything, but I think it's more effective than petulant immaturity. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 05:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
546074 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546071 +++$+++ 546073 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.251293400E09 +++$+++ Agreed! Templating regulars does nothing but annoy. -- +++$+++ ::: Agreed! Templating regulars does nothing but annoy. --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 06:30, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
546075 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546071 +++$+++ 546074 +++$+++ 2009-08-26 16:59:00 +++$+++ 1.251331140E09 +++$+++ Ah. So then you intended to annoy Tim? That seems like a less than constructive, and less than [[WP:CIVIL|civil]], means of addressing a concern. ''' +++$+++ ::::Ah. So then you intended to annoy Tim? That seems like a less than constructive, and less than [[WP:CIVIL|civil]], means of addressing a concern. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 16:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
546076 +++$+++ Surturz +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546071 +++$+++ 546075 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 05:35:00 +++$+++ 1.251376500E09 +++$+++ Will reply on your talk page. -- +++$+++ :::::Will reply on your talk page. --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 05:35, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

283928 +++$+++ OSX +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-13 22:44:00 +++$+++ 1.195022640E09 +++$+++ I have started a discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles]] about your recent additions to articles that have previously won the ''Wheels Car of the Year'' award. I would appreciate it if you could provide some input into the matter. <small> +++$+++ I have started a discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles]] about your recent additions to articles that have previously won the ''Wheels Car of the Year'' award. I would appreciate it if you could provide some input into the matter. <small>[[User:OSX|OSX]] ([[User talk:OSX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OSX|contributions]])</small> 22:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
283929 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283928 +++$+++ 283928 +++$+++ 2007-11-14 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.195038360E09 +++$+++ Sure. Have provided input as requested, pointless as that appeared to be. -- +++$+++ :Sure. Have provided input as requested, pointless as that appeared to be. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 03:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

283930 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-28 11:13:00 +++$+++ 1.196277180E09 +++$+++ SlackerMom: noticed you recently connected a link from the two Bathurst 24 Hour races to this driver. Can you confirm this American driver raced these Australian races? There was an Australian based driver with that name and I do not believe it to be the same person. -- +++$+++ SlackerMom: noticed you recently connected a link from the two Bathurst 24 Hour races to this driver. Can you confirm this American driver raced these Australian races? There was an Australian based driver with that name and I do not believe it to be the same person. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore|talk]]) 11:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
283931 +++$+++ SlackerMom +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283930 +++$+++ 283930 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.196284020E09 +++$+++ Nope, I cannot confirm that.  I linked to [[Chris Smith (driver)]] based on assumption only.  I have been trying to remove links to [[Chris Smith]], which is a disambiguation page, and I'm sure I often make mistakes.  There are apparently far more Chris Smith's in the world than anyone could hope to keep straight, so I appreciate your catching this one.  There a few options to correct this.  We could: 1-delink Chris Smith in the Bathurst 24 Hour race articles (better then linking to the wrong person), 2-create a redlink such as [[Chris Smith (Australian driver)]], or something similar, if we think an article should\/will someday exist for this person. What do you think?  +++$+++ :Nope, I cannot confirm that.  I linked to [[Chris Smith (driver)]] based on assumption only.  I have been trying to remove links to [[Chris Smith]], which is a disambiguation page, and I'm sure I often make mistakes.  There are apparently far more Chris Smith's in the world than anyone could hope to keep straight, so I appreciate your catching this one.  There a few options to correct this.  We could: 1-delink Chris Smith in the Bathurst 24 Hour race articles (better then linking to the wrong person), 2-create a redlink such as [[Chris Smith (Australian driver)]], or something similar, if we think an article should/will someday exist for this person. What do you think? [[User:SlackerMom|SlackerMom]] ([[User talk:SlackerMom|talk]]) 13:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
283932 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283930 +++$+++ 283930 +++$+++ 2007-12-02 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.196622540E09 +++$+++ \"With Garth Tander moving into the team for 2008...\" - That's not a rumour, that's saying it's done. That's why it was deleted. -- +++$+++ :"With Garth Tander moving into the team for 2008..." - That's not a rumour, that's saying it's done. That's why it was deleted. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 11:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
283933 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283930 +++$+++ 283930 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.196708580E09 +++$+++ 'Pro-Aussie' has no place in Wikipedia. Pro-Aussie is essentially the defination of NPOV. -- +++$+++ :'Pro-Aussie' has no place in Wikipedia. Pro-Aussie is essentially the defination of NPOV. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] 11:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

21789 +++$+++ ZimZalaBim +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21789 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-29 17:21:00 +++$+++ 1.212106860E09 +++$+++ Please end this thread. This discussion page is meant to talk about improving the article, not a general troubleshooting guide for using YouTube. Thank you. -- +++$+++ Please end this thread. This discussion page is meant to talk about improving the article, not a general troubleshooting guide for using YouTube. Thank you. --[[User:ZimZalaBim|<font color="black">Zim</font><font color="darkgreen">'''Zala'''</font><font color="black">Bim</font>]] <sup><font color="black">[[User talk:ZimZalaBim|talk]]</font></sup> 17:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
21790 +++$+++ Ianmacm +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21789 +++$+++ 21789 +++$+++ 2008-05-29 17:35:00 +++$+++ 1.212107700E09 +++$+++ OK.  Wikipedia is not a help forum or [[WP:NOTHOWTO|howto]] manual, but I have tried to answer the question so that future users do not post the same question. --''''' +++$+++ :OK.  Wikipedia is not a help forum or [[WP:NOTHOWTO|howto]] manual, but I have tried to answer the question so that future users do not post the same question. --'''''[[User:ianmacm|<span style="background:#88b;color:#cff;font-variant:small-caps">♦Ian<span style="background:#99c">Ma<span style="background:#aad">c</span></span>M♦</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ianmacm|(talk to me)]]</sup>''''' 17:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

283935 +++$+++ Willirennen +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283935 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-10 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.197341580E09 +++$+++ Sorry about this, I was doing this and copying them from other articles that had lists when I was feeling tired (about 4am GMT), I have removed as many duplicates as I can, feel free to make further edits.  +++$+++ Sorry about this, I was doing this and copying them from other articles that had lists when I was feeling tired (about 4am GMT), I have removed as many duplicates as I can, feel free to make further edits. [[User:Willirennen|Willirennen]] ([[User talk:Willirennen|talk]]) 18:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
283936 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283935 +++$+++ 283935 +++$+++ 2007-12-22 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.198392360E09 +++$+++ Well, Tony D'Alberto at Rod Nash has been confirmed some time back now - his team has taken over the franchise from Independant Race Cars, who have been forced to step back to Fujitsu series and may run Jack Perkins, and are testing drivers to replace D'Alberto in the Fujitsu series car, I think David Reynolds was in the frame there. Motorsport News ran David Besnard on their front cover last week - must be something to that. Some of those driver moves have been referenced and attributed at [[2008 V8 Supercar season]], but maybe you might want to fix that page too. I'll respect that if you so choose. Part of the desire to fix the template was because the template was showing different information from the 2008 season page and they looked a little silly saying different things on the same page. -- +++$+++ :Well, Tony D'Alberto at Rod Nash has been confirmed some time back now - his team has taken over the franchise from Independant Race Cars, who have been forced to step back to Fujitsu series and may run Jack Perkins, and are testing drivers to replace D'Alberto in the Fujitsu series car, I think David Reynolds was in the frame there. Motorsport News ran David Besnard on their front cover last week - must be something to that. Some of those driver moves have been referenced and attributed at [[2008 V8 Supercar season]], but maybe you might want to fix that page too. I'll respect that if you so choose. Part of the desire to fix the template was because the template was showing different information from the 2008 season page and they looked a little silly saying different things on the same page. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 22:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

21793 +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21793 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-03 04:28:00 +++$+++ 1.215084480E09 +++$+++ I noticed you made a cross-post on [[Wikipedia talk:Categorization#LargeCategoryTOC as in German wikipedia]] there. Note I gave you an answer at length much earlier today. Hope that helps. \/\/ <b> +++$+++ I noticed you made a cross-post on [[Wikipedia talk:Categorization#LargeCategoryTOC as in German wikipedia]] there. Note I gave you an answer at length much earlier today. Hope that helps. // <b>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</b><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 04:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
21794 +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21793 +++$+++ 21793 +++$+++ 2008-07-03 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.215086880E09 +++$+++ Yer welcome. Meant to drop a ping here earlier. Only happenstance I got reminded at the pump. I would have patrolled back in a few daze though. Maybe. I don't do watch lists. Cover too much ground. Cheers. \/\/ <b> +++$+++ :Yer welcome. Meant to drop a ping here earlier. Only happenstance I got reminded at the pump. I would have patrolled back in a few daze though. Maybe. I don't do watch lists. Cover too much ground. Cheers. // <b>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</b><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 05:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
21795 +++$+++ Fabartus +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21793 +++$+++ 21794 +++$+++ 2008-07-09 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.215657240E09 +++$+++ FYI, Just saw [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:Categorization#Category_diffusion_overview this], which looks interesting, but haven't the time to follow the links to make sure I got the point. Of course, the many are on vacations this time of year, but if I'd invested the time you did, I'd make sure to post a link to Proposals on the [[WP:VPP|Policies Vpump]]. \/\/ <b> +++$+++ ::FYI, Just saw [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Categorization#Category_diffusion_overview this], which looks interesting, but haven't the time to follow the links to make sure I got the point. Of course, the many are on vacations this time of year, but if I'd invested the time you did, I'd make sure to post a link to Proposals on the [[WP:VPP|Policies Vpump]]. // <b>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</b><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 19:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

283940 +++$+++ Willirennen +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283940 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-13 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.200266880E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Willirennen|Willirennen]] ([[User talk:Willirennen|talk]]) 15:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
283941 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283940 +++$+++ 283940 +++$+++ 2008-01-13 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.200270300E09 +++$+++ FYI: If I remember rightly the difference between a Levin and a Sprinter came down to a 1.5 vs 1.6 litre engine? A moot point when the engine is ripped out and replaced with a Group A 1.6 motor isn't it? The first two Corollas TTA built, one was a fastback Levin or Sprinter (they called it a Sprinter) and the other was the notchback - hence the Corolla GT label. From what I remember the notchback was the first of TTA's cars to be retired and was a static showcar by 1987. -- +++$+++ :FYI: If I remember rightly the difference between a Levin and a Sprinter came down to a 1.5 vs 1.6 litre engine? A moot point when the engine is ripped out and replaced with a Group A 1.6 motor isn't it? The first two Corollas TTA built, one was a fastback Levin or Sprinter (they called it a Sprinter) and the other was the notchback - hence the Corolla GT label. From what I remember the notchback was the first of TTA's cars to be retired and was a static showcar by 1987. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 16:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
283942 +++$+++ Willirennen +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283940 +++$+++ 283941 +++$+++ 2008-01-13 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.200276960E09 +++$+++ Just to point out that I am not a big expert on The Great Race but a fan of the track and the race, so I am not going to know every car that entered the race, hence I don't plan to take the split any further as I have as done much as I can.  +++$+++ ::Just to point out that I am not a big expert on The Great Race but a fan of the track and the race, so I am not going to know every car that entered the race, hence I don't plan to take the split any further as I have as done much as I can. [[User:Willirennen|Willirennen]] ([[User talk:Willirennen|talk]]) 18:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
283943 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283940 +++$+++ 283942 +++$+++ 2008-01-13 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.200294300E09 +++$+++ I feel I must re-iterate, splitting makes the article less readable. -- +++$+++ :::I feel I must re-iterate, splitting makes the article less readable. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 23:05, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
283944 +++$+++ Willirennen +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283940 +++$+++ 283943 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.200313800E09 +++$+++ The issue with the BMW 3 series bit is, isn't that what most people refer them as rather than standalone model numbers, unless they want to compare their 3 series over their mates with another 3 series. People (who I happened to have met before) aren't going around and say \"I own a 316i\" if they want something to brag about, especially when their mate own a 330i or a M3, they just say I own a 3 series BMW, which allows the other person to take a guess; therefore merging them in one line is as reasonable as having the Falcons and Commodores in one line.  +++$+++ ::::The issue with the BMW 3 series bit is, isn't that what most people refer them as rather than standalone model numbers, unless they want to compare their 3 series over their mates with another 3 series. People (who I happened to have met before) aren't going around and say "I own a 316i" if they want something to brag about, especially when their mate own a 330i or a M3, they just say I own a 3 series BMW, which allows the other person to take a guess; therefore merging them in one line is as reasonable as having the Falcons and Commodores in one line. [[User:Willirennen|Willirennen]] ([[User talk:Willirennen|talk]]) 04:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

546086 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546086 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-27 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.251364560E09 +++$+++ Yes, perhaps you could discuss your changes on [[Talk:Archaea]]?  +++$+++ Yes, perhaps you could discuss your changes on [[Talk:Archaea]]? [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 02:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
546087 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546086 +++$+++ 546086 +++$+++ 2009-08-27 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.251432900E09 +++$+++ That reference (Garcia-Vallv\xe9 ''et. al.'') does not discuss Archaeal taxonomy. The influence of HGT on classification is discussed in detail in [[Archaea#Current_classification]].  +++$+++ :That reference (Garcia-Vallvé ''et. al.'') does not discuss Archaeal taxonomy. The influence of HGT on classification is discussed in detail in [[Archaea#Current_classification]]. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 21:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
546088 +++$+++ Xook1kai Choa6aur +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546086 +++$+++ 546087 +++$+++ 2009-08-28 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.251462120E09 +++$+++ Garcia-Vallv\xe9 ''et. al.'' was a source of numerical estimation for HTG. Do You know that HTG was sourced below and new source was not necessary?  +++$+++ ::Garcia-Vallvé ''et. al.'' was a source of numerical estimation for HTG. Do You know that HTG was sourced below and new source was not necessary? [[User:Xook1kai Choa6aur|Xook1kai Choa6aur]] ([[User talk:Xook1kai Choa6aur|talk]]) 05:22, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

283945 +++$+++ The359 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283945 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-14 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.200333480E09 +++$+++ Since I'm not sure if you saw the discussions, I basically ask your opinion on this.  I know that you write a lot of race summaries for other series, such as the various Australian touring car series and such, but since this series falls under Sports Car Racing, I figured I'd bring it up.  +++$+++ Since I'm not sure if you saw the discussions, I basically ask your opinion on this.  I know that you write a lot of race summaries for other series, such as the various Australian touring car series and such, but since this series falls under Sports Car Racing, I figured I'd bring it up. [[User:The359|The359]] ([[User talk:The359|talk]]) 09:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
283946 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283945 +++$+++ 283945 +++$+++ 2008-01-14 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.200337200E09 +++$+++ Was not planning any individual GT races other this this one. The GT folk are are planning the GT Classic as a standout enduro race, similar in its way that Bathurst is to the V8 Supercar series. -- +++$+++ :Was not planning any individual GT races other this this one. The GT folk are are planning the GT Classic as a standout enduro race, similar in its way that Bathurst is to the V8 Supercar series. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 11:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
283947 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283945 +++$+++ 283946 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.200912240E09 +++$+++ That having been said, I was planning to add any international motor race held in Australia, hence the recent addition of the two World Sportscar round that were held in Australia, and the backwards history expansion of the Australian CART\/Champ Car round. Rally Australia also beckons, Australian Motorcycle Grand Prix, continuing the Bathurst 1000 back into the 1960's, and the Australian Grand Prix back  into the 70's the Formula 5000 era, and at some point no doubt the Tasman Cup series. Plus I have intention to cover several current national series. Thoughts? -- +++$+++ ::That having been said, I was planning to add any international motor race held in Australia, hence the recent addition of the two World Sportscar round that were held in Australia, and the backwards history expansion of the Australian CART/Champ Car round. Rally Australia also beckons, Australian Motorcycle Grand Prix, continuing the Bathurst 1000 back into the 1960's, and the Australian Grand Prix back  into the 70's the Formula 5000 era, and at some point no doubt the Tasman Cup series. Plus I have intention to cover several current national series. Thoughts? --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 02:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
283948 +++$+++ The359 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283945 +++$+++ 283947 +++$+++ 2008-01-21 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.200912780E09 +++$+++ I can understand international events in Australia being added, such as the series you mentioned, since those are considered top tier series.  I plan to have a lookover and expand on your work on the two WSC rounds in Australia.  +++$+++ :::I can understand international events in Australia being added, such as the series you mentioned, since those are considered top tier series.  I plan to have a lookover and expand on your work on the two WSC rounds in Australia. [[User:The359|The359]] ([[User talk:The359|talk]]) 02:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

21803 +++$+++ Logicus +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21803 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-29 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.222735380E09 +++$+++ I shall delete your copy editing invitation in the [[Tycho Brahe]] article because apart from being mistaken and injust in my view, the last time somebody copy edited what I wrote they rendered it illogical nonsense. This misplaced general invitation may well promote the same. I do not see any difficulty in parsing the paragraphs of that section such as you claim, nor any other defects such as implied. It was drafted with great care to clarify key logical points. If you do have any specific criticisms and edit suggestions for its improvement I would be grateful if you would first post them on the Talk page or on my User Talk page for discussion first, rather than posting any general invitation on the article itself.-- +++$+++ I shall delete your copy editing invitation in the [[Tycho Brahe]] article because apart from being mistaken and injust in my view, the last time somebody copy edited what I wrote they rendered it illogical nonsense. This misplaced general invitation may well promote the same. I do not see any difficulty in parsing the paragraphs of that section such as you claim, nor any other defects such as implied. It was drafted with great care to clarify key logical points. If you do have any specific criticisms and edit suggestions for its improvement I would be grateful if you would first post them on the Talk page or on my User Talk page for discussion first, rather than posting any general invitation on the article itself.--[[User:Logicus|Logicus]] ([[User talk:Logicus|talk]]) 17:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
21804 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21803 +++$+++ 21803 +++$+++ 2008-09-29 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.222742400E09 +++$+++ Thank you for letting me know. I have added some of my concerns at [[Talk:Tycho Brahe#Tycho's Geo-heliocentric Astronomy]]. - +++$+++ :Thank you for letting me know. I have added some of my concerns at [[Talk:Tycho Brahe#Tycho's Geo-heliocentric Astronomy]]. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 19:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

283949 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-15 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.200391680E09 +++$+++ Hi Falcadore. On my screen, some of the entries in your \"Created Pages\" list (specifically 2002 V8 Supercar season\u200e, \u200e 2003 Bob Jane T-Marts 1000,\u200e 2003 Lexmark Indy 300,\u200e 2003 V8 Supercar season\u200e, 2004 Lexmark Indy 300,\u200e 2005 Lexmark Indy 300,\u200e 2005 Supercheap Auto 1000 and 2005 V8 Supercar season\u200e) appear slightly indented, but looking at the wikitext I can't see any reason why they should be. Do they appear slightly indented to you too? Or is it just me? Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Falcadore. On my screen, some of the entries in your "Created Pages" list (specifically 2002 V8 Supercar season‎, ‎ 2003 Bob Jane T-Marts 1000,‎ 2003 Lexmark Indy 300,‎ 2003 V8 Supercar season‎, 2004 Lexmark Indy 300,‎ 2005 Lexmark Indy 300,‎ 2005 Supercheap Auto 1000 and 2005 V8 Supercar season‎) appear slightly indented, but looking at the wikitext I can't see any reason why they should be. Do they appear slightly indented to you too? Or is it just me? Thanks. [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] ([[User talk:DH85868993|talk]]) 02:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
283950 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283949 +++$+++ 283949 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.200394440E09 +++$+++ Noticed that too. It's an odd one - there is nothing in the code that is different for the indented lines. This does not show up when I view the page in Firefox, but it does in Explorer. Don't know, and don't care that much, the main reason the list is there is so I can keep track of what I've done, it would be easy for me to forget, and it's gotten longer than I thought it would have. -- +++$+++ :Noticed that too. It's an odd one - there is nothing in the code that is different for the indented lines. This does not show up when I view the page in Firefox, but it does in Explorer. Don't know, and don't care that much, the main reason the list is there is so I can keep track of what I've done, it would be easy for me to forget, and it's gotten longer than I thought it would have. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 02:54, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
283951 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283949 +++$+++ 283950 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.200410040E09 +++$+++ Ah, so it's an Explorerism them. I should have thought to check it in Firefox myself. And of course, you're right about it not being important - in fact feel free to delete this whole discussion!  +++$+++ ::Ah, so it's an Explorerism them. I should have thought to check it in Firefox myself. And of course, you're right about it not being important - in fact feel free to delete this whole discussion! [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] ([[User talk:DH85868993|talk]]) 07:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
283952 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283949 +++$+++ 283951 +++$+++ 2008-01-15 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.200410160E09 +++$+++ Might be important if it affects future articles. Myself - don't know. -- +++$+++ :::Might be important if it affects future articles. Myself - don't know. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 07:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

21807 +++$+++ 198.240.128.75 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-28 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.225228800E09 +++$+++ Hi there, many thanks for editing that picture and putting it back up.  Could you edit the image again to change the captions from 'insurance' buyer and seller to 'protection' buyer and seller plz?  Article specifically notes that a CDS is not insurance.  Thanks!!  [[Special:Contributions\/198.240.128.75|198.240.128.75]] ( +++$+++ Hi there, many thanks for editing that picture and putting it back up.  Could you edit the image again to change the captions from 'insurance' buyer and seller to 'protection' buyer and seller plz?  Article specifically notes that a CDS is not insurance.  Thanks!!  [[Special:Contributions/198.240.128.75|198.240.128.75]] ([[User talk:198.240.128.75|talk]]) 14:20, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
21808 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21807 +++$+++ 21807 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 15:10:00 +++$+++ 1.225231800E09 +++$+++ {{done}} - +++$+++ :{{done}} -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 15:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
21809 +++$+++ 198.240.128.75 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21807 +++$+++ 21808 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.225234260E09 +++$+++ Thank you [[Special:Contributions\/198.240.128.75|198.240.128.75]] ( +++$+++ ::Thank you [[Special:Contributions/198.240.128.75|198.240.128.75]] ([[User talk:198.240.128.75|talk]]) 15:51, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

21810 +++$+++ Quiddity +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21810 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-30 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.228046640E09 +++$+++ Hi, I saw the images at [[Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_statistics#Graphs (November_2008)]], and was wondering if you might have time to do the same for the [[Wikipedia:Featured lists]]? (I'm not sure how complicated the process is(?). Just a longtime-beginner-ubuntu user myself; Don't know my way around emacs or modern office-software yet...). Thanks. --  +++$+++ Hi, I saw the images at [[Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_statistics#Graphs (November_2008)]], and was wondering if you might have time to do the same for the [[Wikipedia:Featured lists]]? (I'm not sure how complicated the process is(?). Just a longtime-beginner-ubuntu user myself; Don't know my way around emacs or modern office-software yet...). Thanks. -- [[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] ([[User talk:Quiddity|talk]]) 04:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
21811 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21810 +++$+++ 21810 +++$+++ 2008-11-30 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.228089540E09 +++$+++ Now, (this is going to be a long discussion, so skip it if not relevant) if someone was to do a fresh chart regularly then an automated means of counting the FLs is needed. For the above example I used the \"counta\" function in Gnumeric to save counting manually. But the [[Wikipedia:Featured lists]] page is not laid out to make such automated counting possible, unlike the [[Wikipedia:Featured articles]] page (at least not without using Perl or awk-like scripts). If another \"view\" of the FL page, in the FA-style, could be produced, where there are major sections followed by simple lists of articles, then data-creating can be mostly automated. Even better would be some SQL that would generate the desired data (but I could not see any relationships between the main section headers and the articles listed - no categories for \"Art Featured list\" for example). I <s>am now doing<\/s> have now done a chart [[:Image:FL barchart by number 2008-11-30.svg]] for the top sections Art to \"Politics and government\", but the manual editing of the sub- and sub-sub-section text data would get tedious to repeat. Anyway have a look at the instructions above, and\/or produce your own ordered data lists to feed into Gnumeric for other charts. [[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 14:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC) <small>(Added major chart)<\/small> +++$+++ :Now, (this is going to be a long discussion, so skip it if not relevant) if someone was to do a fresh chart regularly then an automated means of counting the FLs is needed. For the above example I used the "counta" function in Gnumeric to save counting manually. But the [[Wikipedia:Featured lists]] page is not laid out to make such automated counting possible, unlike the [[Wikipedia:Featured articles]] page (at least not without using Perl or awk-like scripts). If another "view" of the FL page, in the FA-style, could be produced, where there are major sections followed by simple lists of articles, then data-creating can be mostly automated. Even better would be some SQL that would generate the desired data (but I could not see any relationships between the main section headers and the articles listed - no categories for "Art Featured list" for example). I <s>am now doing</s> have now done a chart [[:Image:FL barchart by number 2008-11-30.svg]] for the top sections Art to "Politics and government", but the manual editing of the sub- and sub-sub-section text data would get tedious to repeat. Anyway have a look at the instructions above, and/or produce your own ordered data lists to feed into Gnumeric for other charts. [[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 14:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC) <small>(Added major chart)</small>[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 15:59, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

21812 +++$+++ TWCarlson +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21812 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-05 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.228523940E09 +++$+++ These clickable images are great! Can you make one for the 10^-6 to 10^5 range too?  +++$+++ These clickable images are great! Can you make one for the 10^-6 to 10^5 range too? [[User:TWCarlson|TWCarlson]] ([[User talk:TWCarlson|talk]]) 16:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
21813 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21812 +++$+++ 21812 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 15:34:00 +++$+++ 1.229556840E09 +++$+++ I have replied on your Talk page [[User talk:Prad2609#On ISRO images|here]]. Please also see [[Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#ISRO images - freely licensed?]].  +++$+++ :I have replied on your Talk page [[User talk:Prad2609#On ISRO images|here]]. Please also see [[Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#ISRO images - freely licensed?]]. [[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 15:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

21814 +++$+++ Johnxxx9 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21814 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-18 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.229661240E09 +++$+++ Just tell me what sort of written statement should I get from him ! I hope I will be allowed. Just reply on my talk page.  +++$+++ Just tell me what sort of written statement should I get from him ! I hope I will be allowed. Just reply on my talk page. [[User:johnxxx9|johnxxx9]] ([[User talk:johnxxx9|talk]]) 20:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
21815 +++$+++ Johnxxx9 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-18 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.229666040E09 +++$+++ How is this letter on my talk page ([[User talk:johnxxx9|talk]]) and what sort of reply should I get from him in the form of a letter. +++$+++ :: How is this letter on my talk page ([[User talk:johnxxx9|talk]]) and what sort of reply should I get from him in the form of a letter.[[User:johnxxx9|johnxxx9]] ([[User talk:johnxxx9|talk]]) 21:54, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

546104 +++$+++ Malljaja +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546104 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-01 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.251855300E09 +++$+++ I disagree with the notion that this discussion is premature (unless I have misunderstood the nature of this discussion). Some of what has just emerged here is deeply troubling and calls for a speedy resolution. I am referring to the prior problems with the 76-IP editor raised by Johnuniq that include rants and slurs by 76-IP that are wholly incompatible with WP policy and etiquette  (see [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/IncidentArchive545#76.16.176.166_talk here]). In my opinion a checkuser enquiry may be in order to determine if XC is identical to 76.16.176.166\u2014this could help shed light on whether or not we're dealing with someone who basically acts in good faith vs someone who has a history of repeated and irrational insults. I interpret the current silence by XC as a response to the report to ANI (or else, as temporary absence due to daily obligations), seeing that they had edited in the same vein earlier today and never responded to Adrian's comments. As Tim has pointed out [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents#User:Xook1kai_Choa6aur here], there are two issues, content provided, and behaviour displayed, by this editor\u2014the latter issue seems much more serious, and I feel if identity of XC and 76-IP were confirmed that the behavioural attitudes (lack of civility, verbal abuse, and vandalism evidenced by repeated POV edits and inability or rejecting to heed advice on talk pages) should be grounds enough for revoking this editor's editing privileges.   +++$+++ I disagree with the notion that this discussion is premature (unless I have misunderstood the nature of this discussion). Some of what has just emerged here is deeply troubling and calls for a speedy resolution. I am referring to the prior problems with the 76-IP editor raised by Johnuniq that include rants and slurs by 76-IP that are wholly incompatible with WP policy and etiquette  (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive545#76.16.176.166_talk here]). In my opinion a checkuser enquiry may be in order to determine if XC is identical to 76.16.176.166—this could help shed light on whether or not we're dealing with someone who basically acts in good faith vs someone who has a history of repeated and irrational insults. I interpret the current silence by XC as a response to the report to ANI (or else, as temporary absence due to daily obligations), seeing that they had edited in the same vein earlier today and never responded to Adrian's comments. As Tim has pointed out [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Xook1kai_Choa6aur here], there are two issues, content provided, and behaviour displayed, by this editor—the latter issue seems much more serious, and I feel if identity of XC and 76-IP were confirmed that the behavioural attitudes (lack of civility, verbal abuse, and vandalism evidenced by repeated POV edits and inability or rejecting to heed advice on talk pages) should be grounds enough for revoking this editor's editing privileges.  [[User:Malljaja|Malljaja]] ([[User talk:Malljaja|talk]]) 18:35, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
546105 +++$+++ Adrian J. Hunter +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546104 +++$+++ 546104 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.251971220E09 +++$+++ The AN\/I post is now [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/IncidentArchive561#User:Xook1kai_Choa6aur|archived]].  I guess it fell in the too hard basket.   +++$+++ :The AN/I post is now [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive561#User:Xook1kai_Choa6aur|archived]].  I guess it fell in the too hard basket.  [[User:Adrian J. Hunter|Adrian&nbsp;'''J.'''&nbsp;Hunter]]<sup>([[User talk:Adrian J. Hunter|talk]]•[[Special:contributions/Adrian J. Hunter|contribs]])</sup> 02:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546106 +++$+++ ClockworkSoul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546104 +++$+++ 546105 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 14:33:00 +++$+++ 1.252013580E09 +++$+++ That's one possibility. Another is that his behavior a) isn't extreme enough, or b) gone on quite long enough to warrant punitive action at this time. &ndash;  +++$+++ ::That's one possibility. Another is that his behavior a) isn't extreme enough, or b) gone on quite long enough to warrant punitive action at this time. &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 14:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546107 +++$+++ Adrian J. Hunter +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546104 +++$+++ 546106 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 16:36:00 +++$+++ 1.252020960E09 +++$+++ Perhaps, though if an admin looked into it and concluded such they ought to have noted so, if only to save other admins the time re-checking.  XC doesn't seem to have been problematic since the post, anyway.   +++$+++ :::Perhaps, though if an admin looked into it and concluded such they ought to have noted so, if only to save other admins the time re-checking.  XC doesn't seem to have been problematic since the post, anyway.  [[User:Adrian J. Hunter|Adrian&nbsp;'''J.'''&nbsp;Hunter]]<sup>([[User talk:Adrian J. Hunter|talk]]•[[Special:contributions/Adrian J. Hunter|contribs]])</sup> 16:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546108 +++$+++ ClockworkSoul +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546104 +++$+++ 546107 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 18:27:00 +++$+++ 1.252027620E09 +++$+++ On those two points I definitely agree. &ndash;  +++$+++ ::::On those two points I definitely agree. &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 18:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

21817 +++$+++ SimonTrew +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21817 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-14 13:56:00 +++$+++ 1.237064160E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:SimonTrew|SimonTrew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 13:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
21818 +++$+++ SimonTrew +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21817 +++$+++ 21817 +++$+++ 2009-03-14 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.237094040E09 +++$+++ I had the Crick biog in an engkish first edition, but sold it a couple of months ago. grrr....  +++$+++ :I had the Crick biog in an engkish first edition, but sold it a couple of months ago. grrr.... [[User:SimonTrew|SimonTrew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 22:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
21819 +++$+++ SimonTrew +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21817 +++$+++ 21818 +++$+++ 2009-04-14 19:49:00 +++$+++ 1.239763740E09 +++$+++ Best wishes  +++$+++ ::Best wishes [[User:SimonTrew|SimonTrew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 19:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

283963 +++$+++ Stealthman +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283963 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-11 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.205247060E09 +++$+++ Hey, Falcadore. I've been thinking about this for a while, and I just wanted to clear something up. You may recall my reply to your comments on \"China\" in the V8 Supercars article. When you corrected my notions, I may have sounded rude when I said \"you obviously know more about this than I do.\" I really didn't mean to sound so offended. What I was trying to say was that I didn't know as much about the matter in question as you did. After all, at the time, I had only been following the sport for a year or so. If I gave you the wrong message, I apologise for my actions. Hope there's no bad blood between us... ?  +++$+++ Hey, Falcadore. I've been thinking about this for a while, and I just wanted to clear something up. You may recall my reply to your comments on "China" in the V8 Supercars article. When you corrected my notions, I may have sounded rude when I said "you obviously know more about this than I do." I really didn't mean to sound so offended. What I was trying to say was that I didn't know as much about the matter in question as you did. After all, at the time, I had only been following the sport for a year or so. If I gave you the wrong message, I apologise for my actions. Hope there's no bad blood between us... ? [[User:Stealthman|Stealthman]] ([[User talk:Stealthman|talk]]) 07:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
283964 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283963 +++$+++ 283963 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.205652300E09 +++$+++ No problem at all, I'd forgotten the incident. -- +++$+++ :No problem at all, I'd forgotten the incident. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 00:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
283965 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283963 +++$+++ 283963 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.205652300E09 +++$+++ If you'd done it in one hit rather than piece by piece then it would attract less ire, and use up less space creating additional iterations of the page. -- +++$+++ :If you'd done it in one hit rather than piece by piece then it would attract less ire, and use up less space creating additional iterations of the page. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 00:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
283966 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283963 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 20:23:00 +++$+++ 1.205724180E09 +++$+++ Doing it that way means people see you deleting large sections, and going by your talk page it hasn't been particularly popular. If you are new then perhaps you might consider learning from that feedback. -- +++$+++ :::Doing it that way means people see you deleting large sections, and going by your talk page it hasn't been particularly popular. If you are new then perhaps you might consider learning from that feedback. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 20:23, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
283967 +++$+++ Nearly famous writer +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283963 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-03-17 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.205738040E09 +++$+++ Well now I know that ... +++$+++ ::::Well now I know that ...[[User:Nearly famous writer|Nearly famous writer]] ([[User talk:Nearly famous writer|talk]]) 00:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

546109 +++$+++ Malljaja +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546109 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-04 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.252098000E09 +++$+++ I too wonder why they didn't even bother leaving a note\u2014given the efforts that went into this, I would have at least expected some measure of transparency. It reeks of a buck being passed. Very unfortunate.  +++$+++ I too wonder why they didn't even bother leaving a note—given the efforts that went into this, I would have at least expected some measure of transparency. It reeks of a buck being passed. Very unfortunate. [[User:Malljaja|Malljaja]] ([[User talk:Malljaja|talk]]) 14:00, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
546110 +++$+++ Adrian J. Hunter +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546109 +++$+++ 546109 +++$+++ 2009-09-06 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.252278600E09 +++$+++ Perhaps not deliberate buck-passing.  Just noticed point 49 of [[User:Moreschi\/Wikithoughts, Wikimorality, Wikiphilosophies]]: \"''Do not take your problems to ANI anymore. You will probably not get an administrative response. (...) ANI has grown so massive that a too-thinly-spread admin corps cannot cope. Try other noticeboards, or the talk pages of specific admins.''\"  +++$+++ :Perhaps not deliberate buck-passing.  Just noticed point 49 of [[User:Moreschi/Wikithoughts, Wikimorality, Wikiphilosophies]]: "''Do not take your problems to ANI anymore. You will probably not get an administrative response. (...) ANI has grown so massive that a too-thinly-spread admin corps cannot cope. Try other noticeboards, or the talk pages of specific admins.''" [[User:Adrian J. Hunter|Adrian&nbsp;'''J.'''&nbsp;Hunter]]<sup>([[User talk:Adrian J. Hunter|talk]]•[[Special:contributions/Adrian J. Hunter|contribs]])</sup> 16:10, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

546111 +++$+++ RepublicanJacobite +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546111 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-01 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.251870060E09 +++$+++ I am not going to argue with you about the rollback feature, as such an argument would tend to be a waste of my time.  However, just to be clear, in regard to the first two diffs you cited, a discussion had begun on the talk page, and I had stated my views there, so the rollback was justified inasmuch as the other editor should have waited for the discussion to continue before reverting again.  Furthermore, the reasoning he had given showed a clear ignorance on the subject.  As far as the other two are concerned, it is hardly edit warring to remove uncited opinions from articles, which is what both of those were. ---<font face=\"Georgia\">''' +++$+++ I am not going to argue with you about the rollback feature, as such an argument would tend to be a waste of my time.  However, just to be clear, in regard to the first two diffs you cited, a discussion had begun on the talk page, and I had stated my views there, so the rollback was justified inasmuch as the other editor should have waited for the discussion to continue before reverting again.  Furthermore, the reasoning he had given showed a clear ignorance on the subject.  As far as the other two are concerned, it is hardly edit warring to remove uncited opinions from articles, which is what both of those were. ---<font face="Georgia">'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]'''<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 22:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
546112 +++$+++ 81.108.133.207 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546111 +++$+++ 546111 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.251872820E09 +++$+++ As the other editor involved with the first two diffs, I hope you don't mind if I add a couple of things. Firstly, although the second rollback was made after discussion began. The first was not and I would not have made the same edit again except the lack of a summary made it look like a stray edit caused by over-zealous vandal fighting. Secondly, I've been an editor since 2005 and I'm fairly experienced. Sometimes I take a break but I still make occassional anomymous edits, like this one. Although I think I can recognise POV when I see it, I accept there are indeed probably things I'm ignorant of. That's why an explanation would have been polite. --[[Special:Contributions\/81.108.133.207|81.108.133.207]] ( +++$+++ :As the other editor involved with the first two diffs, I hope you don't mind if I add a couple of things. Firstly, although the second rollback was made after discussion began. The first was not and I would not have made the same edit again except the lack of a summary made it look like a stray edit caused by over-zealous vandal fighting. Secondly, I've been an editor since 2005 and I'm fairly experienced. Sometimes I take a break but I still make occassional anomymous edits, like this one. Although I think I can recognise POV when I see it, I accept there are indeed probably things I'm ignorant of. That's why an explanation would have been polite. --[[Special:Contributions/81.108.133.207|81.108.133.207]] ([[User talk:81.108.133.207|talk]]) 23:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

21825 +++$+++ Aldaron +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-27 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.240860240E09 +++$+++ I'm confused about your preferred handling of the footnote in the [[Gliese 581]] article. The current approach creates a non sequitur for all but one of the citations of the associated article. In print, this would be handled by creating a second ''Op. cit.'' entry for the Bonflis article and placing the quote there. I know that ''Op. cit.'' is discouraged on Wikipedia, but there must be some similar form that replaces it that's more appropriate to use than the current approach. <span style= \"font-family: papyrus; color:silver\">  &mdash;  +++$+++ I'm confused about your preferred handling of the footnote in the [[Gliese 581]] article. The current approach creates a non sequitur for all but one of the citations of the associated article. In print, this would be handled by creating a second ''Op. cit.'' entry for the Bonflis article and placing the quote there. I know that ''Op. cit.'' is discouraged on Wikipedia, but there must be some similar form that replaces it that's more appropriate to use than the current approach. <span style= "font-family: papyrus; color:silver">  &mdash; [[User:Aldaron|Aldaron]] &bull; <small>[[User talk:Aldaron|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Aldaron|C]] </small> </span> 12:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
21826 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21825 +++$+++ 21825 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 13:08:00 +++$+++ 1.240862880E09 +++$+++ Yes my edit is not ideal and not really my preference, more a stop-gap until a better way arrives. I'm trying another way using [[:Template:Harvard citation]] that might be closer to the Op. cit. appearance.  +++$+++ :Yes my edit is not ideal and not really my preference, more a stop-gap until a better way arrives. I'm trying another way using [[:Template:Harvard citation]] that might be closer to the Op. cit. appearance. [[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 13:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
21827 +++$+++ Aldaron +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21825 +++$+++ 21826 +++$+++ 2009-04-27 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.240863000E09 +++$+++ Cool. I'll be watching and learning. Citation is one of the more confusing and useful features of Wikipedia. <span style= \"font-family: papyrus; color:silver\">  &mdash;  +++$+++ ::Cool. I'll be watching and learning. Citation is one of the more confusing and useful features of Wikipedia. <span style= "font-family: papyrus; color:silver">  &mdash; [[User:Aldaron|Aldaron]] &bull; <small>[[User talk:Aldaron|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Aldaron|C]] </small> </span> 13:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

283970 +++$+++ Fruv +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283970 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-18 23:44:00 +++$+++ 1.211179440E09 +++$+++ Hi Falcadore. I noticed you added to the Championships section of the V8 Supercars article. I don't suppose you have any references for that stuff do you? Particularly \"...who formerly raced in the Level One series but have been left behind by increasing pace of the professional team\". This seems like a nice way of saying \"has-beens\" to me. If we're going to state that people are no longer competitive I think we should at least be able to point to a reference. -- +++$+++ Hi Falcadore. I noticed you added to the Championships section of the V8 Supercars article. I don't suppose you have any references for that stuff do you? Particularly "...who formerly raced in the Level One series but have been left behind by increasing pace of the professional team". This seems like a nice way of saying "has-beens" to me. If we're going to state that people are no longer competitive I think we should at least be able to point to a reference. --[[User:Fruv|Fruv]] ([[User talk:Fruv|talk]]) 23:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
283971 +++$+++ Fruv +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283970 +++$+++ 283970 +++$+++ 2008-05-19 05:49:00 +++$+++ 1.211201340E09 +++$+++ You're right. My mistake. -- +++$+++ :You're right. My mistake. --[[User:Fruv|Fruv]] ([[User talk:Fruv|talk]]) 05:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

21828 +++$+++ EdGl +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21828 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-17 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.242624060E09 +++$+++ I strongly oppose your changes to [[cite web]], but I figured discussing it with you instead of simply reverting would be better. I use the template \"cite web\" often, and typing it in without \"Template:\" in front of it is much faster and more convenient. Also, I don't imagine much confusion between \"cite web\" and \"[[WebCite]]\" but that's just me. We should get enough opinions on this to adequately determine consensus.  +++$+++ I strongly oppose your changes to [[cite web]], but I figured discussing it with you instead of simply reverting would be better. I use the template "cite web" often, and typing it in without "Template:" in front of it is much faster and more convenient. Also, I don't imagine much confusion between "cite web" and "[[WebCite]]" but that's just me. We should get enough opinions on this to adequately determine consensus. [[User:EdGl|<font color="green" face="Magneto">'''~EdGl'''</font>]] [[User talk:EdGl|<font color="orange" face="Magneto">&#9733;</font>]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
21829 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21828 +++$+++ 21828 +++$+++ 2009-05-17 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.242626940E09 +++$+++ If it is returned to the cross-namespace redirect, then I would like some hatnote to (a) warn the reader what has happened, and (b) link to other \"cite web\"\/\"webcite\"\/\"citation\" possibilities. I admit my reasoning is weaker in this case because \"cite web\" has a different order to \"web cite\", so I'll remain neutral (inactive in fact) if it is changed. If you want you can move or point to my reply to wherever it is discussed. By the way, I see [[Cross-namespace_redirect]] was recently deleted and is now at [[Wikipedia:Cross-namespace redirects]].  +++$+++ :If it is returned to the cross-namespace redirect, then I would like some hatnote to (a) warn the reader what has happened, and (b) link to other "cite web"/"webcite"/"citation" possibilities. I admit my reasoning is weaker in this case because "cite web" has a different order to "web cite", so I'll remain neutral (inactive in fact) if it is changed. If you want you can move or point to my reply to wherever it is discussed. By the way, I see [[Cross-namespace_redirect]] was recently deleted and is now at [[Wikipedia:Cross-namespace redirects]]. [[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 23:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
21830 +++$+++ EdGl +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21828 +++$+++ 21829 +++$+++ 2009-05-18 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.242637980E09 +++$+++ I have reverted your edit to [[cite web]] and started a discussion  [[Template_talk:Cite_web#Mentioning_cross-namespace_redirect_in_.2Fdoc|here]] for our continued debate :)  +++$+++ ::I have reverted your edit to [[cite web]] and started a discussion  [[Template_talk:Cite_web#Mentioning_cross-namespace_redirect_in_.2Fdoc|here]] for our continued debate :) [[User:EdGl|<font color="green" face="Magneto">'''~EdGl'''</font>]] [[User talk:EdGl|<font color="orange" face="Magneto">&#9733;</font>]] 02:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
21831 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21828 +++$+++ 21828 +++$+++ 2009-05-27 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.243457460E09 +++$+++ I suppose I should have explained better how dead they were, but yes, I've now restored them with an explanation so alternatives can be found. I did first look at youtube user's \"alert5\" video list but did not find alterntives. Incidently the reason I added the alternative links to [[Tengah Air Base]] was also to avoid this linkrot problem in addition to helping users without Flash. See [[Wikipedia talk:External links#You Tube]] for some discussion on the general problem.  +++$+++ :I suppose I should have explained better how dead they were, but yes, I've now restored them with an explanation so alternatives can be found. I did first look at youtube user's "alert5" video list but did not find alterntives. Incidently the reason I added the alternative links to [[Tengah Air Base]] was also to avoid this linkrot problem in addition to helping users without Flash. See [[Wikipedia talk:External links#You Tube]] for some discussion on the general problem. [[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 13:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

280056 +++$+++ Antelan +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-04 06:16:00 +++$+++ 1.194185760E09 +++$+++ If you think this is reasonable, would it be possible to add it to the current Science Apologist and Martinphi Arbitration that is currently ongoing? Thank you for your consideration. ''Note: I '''am''' canvassing all active arbitrators on this issue because I feel that this is a neutral suggestion.'' <font color=\"red\">[[User:Antelan|Ante]]<\/font><font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ If you think this is reasonable, would it be possible to add it to the current Science Apologist and Martinphi Arbitration that is currently ongoing? Thank you for your consideration. ''Note: I '''am''' canvassing all active arbitrators on this issue because I feel that this is a neutral suggestion.'' <font color="red">[[User:Antelan|Ante]]</font><font color="blue">[[User:Antelan|lan]]</font> <sup><font color="darkred">[[User_talk:Antelan|talk]]</font></sup> 06:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
280057 +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ Paul August +++$+++ 280056 +++$+++ 280056 +++$+++ 2007-11-05 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.194303420E09 +++$+++ I've looked.  +++$+++ :I've looked. [[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 14:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

283974 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-12 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.213270680E09 +++$+++ Hope this answers your question.  +++$+++ Hope this answers your question. [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] ([[User talk:DH85868993|talk]]) 04:38, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
283975 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283974 +++$+++ 283974 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.213272840E09 +++$+++ It does. Thanks. -- +++$+++ :It does. Thanks. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 05:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

309473 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309473 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-04 20:44:00 +++$+++ 1.259988240E09 +++$+++ Since this was compiled in October 2009, I thought perhaps you had not seen [http:\/\/www.lib.noaa.gov\/researchtools\/subjectguides\/darwinbib.pdf  The Year of Darwin 2009 ] at NOAA. It lists the Wikipedia [[Charles Darwin]] as one of three internet resources. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ Since this was compiled in October 2009, I thought perhaps you had not seen [http://www.lib.noaa.gov/researchtools/subjectguides/darwinbib.pdf  The Year of Darwin 2009 ] at NOAA. It lists the Wikipedia [[Charles Darwin]] as one of three internet resources. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 20:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
309474 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309473 +++$+++ 309473 +++$+++ 2009-12-04 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.259989200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads-up, they actually list more internet resources on the next three pages, including the WP article ''[[On the Origin of Species]]''. So that's a couple of citations, and in fairness the articles are a useful way to find reliable references. . .  +++$+++ :Thanks for the heads-up, they actually list more internet resources on the next three pages, including the WP article ''[[On the Origin of Species]]''. So that's a couple of citations, and in fairness the articles are a useful way to find reliable references. . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 21:00, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
309475 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309473 +++$+++ 309474 +++$+++ 2009-12-06 12:59:00 +++$+++ 1.260133140E09 +++$+++ NOAA seems to have used discretion in their selection criteria and their compilation is thoughtful. The inclusion of the WP articles is a salute to the hard work you have put into them. Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ :: NOAA seems to have used discretion in their selection criteria and their compilation is thoughtful. The inclusion of the WP articles is a salute to the hard work you have put into them. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 12:59, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
309476 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309473 +++$+++ 309475 +++$+++ 2009-12-06 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.260153480E09 +++$+++ And you and in particular Rusty as well as all other contributors \u2013 don't forget it's a team effort! Many thanks, . .  +++$+++ :::And you and in particular Rusty as well as all other contributors – don't forget it's a team effort! Many thanks, . . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:38, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
309477 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309473 +++$+++ 309476 +++$+++ 2009-12-06 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.260170580E09 +++$+++ Sorry! I do recognize that Rusty and others have contributed greatly. It is a wonderful effort that got the information right.  Regards, \u2014 +++$+++ ::::Sorry! I do recognize that Rusty and others have contributed greatly. It is a wonderful effort that got the information right.  Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

21832 +++$+++ DragonflySixtyseven +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21832 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-29 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.243646400E09 +++$+++ Good enough; they're back.  +++$+++ Good enough; they're back. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 18:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
21833 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21832 +++$+++ 21832 +++$+++ 2009-06-10 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.244676660E09 +++$+++ I have never deleted any article. [[Leslie Vosshall]] does not seem to have ever existed. If you find what the article was called, and it shows as deleted, you can request undeletion at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]]. Alternatively why not ask how best to create a biography page at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Science]]. I hope this helps.  +++$+++ :I have never deleted any article. [[Leslie Vosshall]] does not seem to have ever existed. If you find what the article was called, and it shows as deleted, you can request undeletion at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]]. Alternatively why not ask how best to create a biography page at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Science]]. I hope this helps. [[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 16:31, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

21834 +++$+++ Deon +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21834 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-27 07:08:00 +++$+++ 1.248703680E09 +++$+++ Thanks for catching my mistaken rollback [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Arthur_Conan_Doyle&diff=304432478&oldid=304432415 here] :) &mdash;  +++$+++ Thanks for catching my mistaken rollback [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arthur_Conan_Doyle&diff=304432478&oldid=304432415 here] :) &mdash; [[User:Deon|Deon]]<sup><font color="purple">[[User_talk:Deon|'''talk''']]</font></sup> 07:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
21835 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21834 +++$+++ 21834 +++$+++ 2009-07-27 07:14:00 +++$+++ 1.248704040E09 +++$+++ No problem. The IP user was in the middle of a sequence of unwanted edits so it was confusing for a while.  +++$+++ :No problem. The IP user was in the middle of a sequence of unwanted edits so it was confusing for a while. [[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 07:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

283979 +++$+++ Cs-wolves +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283979 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-16 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.221549180E09 +++$+++ Tabular version for 2008 is much more tidier than the bullet-pointed list of [[List of 2007 motorsport champions]]. Regards.  +++$+++ Tabular version for 2008 is much more tidier than the bullet-pointed list of [[List of 2007 motorsport champions]]. Regards. [[User:Cs-wolves|Cs-wolves]] ([[User talk:Cs-wolves|talk]]) 00:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
283980 +++$+++ Cs-wolves +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283979 +++$+++ 283979 +++$+++ 2008-09-28 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.222656000E09 +++$+++ Are you going to put the motorcycle champions in the motorsport page, or are you going to put them in a similar page to the ones in [[List of 2007 motorcycling champions|2007]]? Regards.  +++$+++ : Are you going to put the motorcycle champions in the motorsport page, or are you going to put them in a similar page to the ones in [[List of 2007 motorcycling champions|2007]]? Regards. [[User:Cs-wolves|Cs-wolves]] ([[User talk:Cs-wolves|talk]]) 19:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
283981 +++$+++ Cs-wolves +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283979 +++$+++ 283980 +++$+++ 2008-09-28 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.222658460E09 +++$+++ Fair point. I was leaning towards the all in one myself, but the two articles just led me to bring attention to it. But, yeah anyhow, I agree with the two in one.  +++$+++ :: Fair point. I was leaning towards the all in one myself, but the two articles just led me to bring attention to it. But, yeah anyhow, I agree with the two in one. [[User:Cs-wolves|Cs-wolves]] ([[User talk:Cs-wolves|talk]]) 20:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
283982 +++$+++ Cs-wolves +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283979 +++$+++ 283981 +++$+++ 2008-10-17 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.224301680E09 +++$+++ Looks like [[User:Donnie Park]] ([[User talk:Donnie Park|talk]]) wants the motorsport article to be split into dual articles again. Just thought I'd bring that to your attention, squire. Regards.  +++$+++ ::: Looks like [[User:Donnie Park]] ([[User talk:Donnie Park|talk]]) wants the motorsport article to be split into dual articles again. Just thought I'd bring that to your attention, squire. Regards. [[User:Cs-wolves|Cs-wolves]] ([[User talk:Cs-wolves|talk]]) 20:48, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

21836 +++$+++ JEN9841 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21836 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-02 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.249221720E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:JEN9841|JEN9841]] ([[User talk:JEN9841|talk]]) 07:02, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
21837 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21836 +++$+++ 21836 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 14:57:00 +++$+++ 1.249423020E09 +++$+++ Hello. Please could you provide a link to exactly where this statement is? I have also asked this on your talk page. Thank you.  +++$+++ :Hello. Please could you provide a link to exactly where this statement is? I have also asked this on your talk page. Thank you. [[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 14:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
21838 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21836 +++$+++ 21836 +++$+++ 2009-08-04 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.249427760E09 +++$+++ '''Update''': Are you referring to the entry I made at [[Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks\/Stu#encyclopedia.stateuniversity.com]]? I have just rechecked that entry and it seems accurate: a random sample of Cambridge Encyclopedia pages shows evident unattributed copies from Wikipedia. The copies are quite evident. You need to properly attribute the wikipedia contributors that are the copyright holders of the summary text copied, in order to abide by the GFD license. Please see [[Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks]] for advice on how to do this.   +++$+++ :'''Update''': Are you referring to the entry I made at [[Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/Stu#encyclopedia.stateuniversity.com]]? I have just rechecked that entry and it seems accurate: a random sample of Cambridge Encyclopedia pages shows evident unattributed copies from Wikipedia. The copies are quite evident. You need to properly attribute the wikipedia contributors that are the copyright holders of the summary text copied, in order to abide by the GFD license. Please see [[Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks]] for advice on how to do this.  [[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 16:16, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

546125 +++$+++ Risker +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546125 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-05 05:36:00 +++$+++ 1.252154160E09 +++$+++ Incidentally....darn good work on this. Best,  +++$+++ Incidentally....darn good work on this. Best, [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 05:36, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
546126 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546125 +++$+++ 546125 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 06:57:00 +++$+++ 1.252850220E09 +++$+++ I took a quick look also: The specialty board business does not adequately consider subspecialties--this are indeed not one of them, but this is not shown by the links. I added the osteopathic Board link, as they are D.O.s  We might consider an article on the journal--let me know if you;d like me to try--its the best way of clarification.  (and I have emailed you. )   ''' +++$+++ :I took a quick look also: The specialty board business does not adequately consider subspecialties--this are indeed not one of them, but this is not shown by the links. I added the osteopathic Board link, as they are D.O.s  We might consider an article on the journal--let me know if you;d like me to try--its the best way of clarification.  (and I have emailed you. )   '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 06:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

21839 +++$+++  +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-22 14:47:00 +++$+++ 1.250977620E09 +++$+++ Upsilon Andromedae's three planets appear separated: b is in the Planet Data Table while c and d are in Candidate extrasolar planets, and the Star Data Table lists only b. Shouldn't they be together? 84user (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ Upsilon Andromedae's three planets appear separated: b is in the Planet Data Table while c and d are in Candidate extrasolar planets, and the Star Data Table lists only b. Shouldn't they be together? 84user (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
21840 +++$+++ GabrielVelasquez +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21839 +++$+++ 21839 +++$+++ 2009-08-25 04:20:00 +++$+++ 1.251199200E09 +++$+++ This area has recently seen a split in the one chart into two charts and the process continues. You should feel free to continue filling in the blanks and correcting errors like the one you pointed out.  +++$+++ :This area has recently seen a split in the one chart into two charts and the process continues. You should feel free to continue filling in the blanks and correcting errors like the one you pointed out. [[User:GabrielVelasquez|GabrielVelasquez]] ([[User talk:GabrielVelasquez|talk]]) 04:20, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

21841 +++$+++ Logicus +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-26 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.251333240E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Logicus|Logicus]] ([[User talk:Logicus|talk]]) 17:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
21842 +++$+++ Logicus +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21841 +++$+++ 21841 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.253840400E09 +++$+++ Good idea to put the Wesley ref I deleted in the Further Reading section. It is a useful article that should not be lost, just a pity it is so limited and useless on the main issue of Tycho's overall stellar accuracy. Also Rawlins' fascinating and Herculean article relocated in Further Reading good.  On Rawlins and Tycho's accuracy in Cat D, I suggest what we need to know is the max and mean errors of all of the 1004 listed stars for which this is possible, and not just of his reduced list of 761 stars with some 240+ that Rawlins discounts apparently just for the purely hagiographical reason of trying to make Tycho as nearly accurate as possible to his self-professed 1'. Rawlins' thesis ultimately seems to be that  Tycho was very accurate once we discount his manifold.inaccuracies, a tautology that equally applies to Hipparchus, Ptolemy, Alfonsine, Prutenic, etc etc.  Did u ever compute what Tycho's Cat D mean error was on Rawlins' awesome analyses of its ecliptic latitude and longitude errors? -- +++$+++ :Good idea to put the Wesley ref I deleted in the Further Reading section. It is a useful article that should not be lost, just a pity it is so limited and useless on the main issue of Tycho's overall stellar accuracy. Also Rawlins' fascinating and Herculean article relocated in Further Reading good.  On Rawlins and Tycho's accuracy in Cat D, I suggest what we need to know is the max and mean errors of all of the 1004 listed stars for which this is possible, and not just of his reduced list of 761 stars with some 240+ that Rawlins discounts apparently just for the purely hagiographical reason of trying to make Tycho as nearly accurate as possible to his self-professed 1'. Rawlins' thesis ultimately seems to be that  Tycho was very accurate once we discount his manifold.inaccuracies, a tautology that equally applies to Hipparchus, Ptolemy, Alfonsine, Prutenic, etc etc.  Did u ever compute what Tycho's Cat D mean error was on Rawlins' awesome analyses of its ecliptic latitude and longitude errors? --[[User:Logicus|Logicus]] ([[User talk:Logicus|talk]]) 18:00, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

283987 +++$+++ Flash176 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283987 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-02 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.222940580E09 +++$+++ Hi. I saw that you've recently added the auto template to some talk pages. Thank you for doing this so that they're noticed, but in the future, please go ahead and rate their importance and quality. There's quite a backlog of unassessed articles (800 now, over 1000 when I started) that I'm trying to get through and would like to keep the list from growing again. If you're interested in rating some articles, you can find the list [[:Category:Unassessed_Automobile_articles|here]]. Thanks.-- +++$+++ Hi. I saw that you've recently added the auto template to some talk pages. Thank you for doing this so that they're noticed, but in the future, please go ahead and rate their importance and quality. There's quite a backlog of unassessed articles (800 now, over 1000 when I started) that I'm trying to get through and would like to keep the list from growing again. If you're interested in rating some articles, you can find the list [[:Category:Unassessed_Automobile_articles|here]]. Thanks.--[[User:Flash176|Flash176]] ([[User talk:Flash176|talk]]) 02:43, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
283988 +++$+++ Flash176 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283987 +++$+++ 283987 +++$+++ 2008-10-02 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.222941660E09 +++$+++ The rule of thumb I usually go by is unless it's someone like [[Henry Ford]], a person, kit car company, sports car, or relatively unknown vehicle will get a low rating. If a car is fairly well known, a lot were made, or it looks like it was made for many years (at least 8-10), then I give it a mid rating. High ratings go to very popular vehicles like the [[Ford F-150]] and [[Honda Civic]], influential people like Henry Ford, or important subject matter ([[Frame (vehicle)]])\/[[Automotive lighting]]. The [[:Category:Top-importance_Automobile_articles|top category]] I reserve pretty much for manufacturers like Ford, Holden, Toyota, etc. Like I said, though, that's just my rule of thumb.-- +++$+++ :The rule of thumb I usually go by is unless it's someone like [[Henry Ford]], a person, kit car company, sports car, or relatively unknown vehicle will get a low rating. If a car is fairly well known, a lot were made, or it looks like it was made for many years (at least 8-10), then I give it a mid rating. High ratings go to very popular vehicles like the [[Ford F-150]] and [[Honda Civic]], influential people like Henry Ford, or important subject matter ([[Frame (vehicle)]])/[[Automotive lighting]]. The [[:Category:Top-importance_Automobile_articles|top category]] I reserve pretty much for manufacturers like Ford, Holden, Toyota, etc. Like I said, though, that's just my rule of thumb.--[[User:Flash176|Flash176]] ([[User talk:Flash176|talk]]) 03:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

283989 +++$+++ Will Pittenger +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283989 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-18 05:56:00 +++$+++ 1.224334560E09 +++$+++ Well, at least my map is more than what was there before my edit.  I am limited to what I can see in Google Earth.  If some of the local roads were changed since then, I will tend to get the latest layout of those roads.  +++$+++ Well, at least my map is more than what was there before my edit.  I am limited to what I can see in Google Earth.  If some of the local roads were changed since then, I will tend to get the latest layout of those roads. [[User:Will Pittenger|Will]] <small>([[User talk:Will Pittenger|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Will Pittenger|contribs]])</small> 05:56, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
283990 +++$+++ Will Pittenger +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283989 +++$+++ 283989 +++$+++ 2008-10-18 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.224387240E09 +++$+++ I know that Google Earth won't help.  That was my point.  Also, I pointed out that there was no map until I got to the article.  A map that may have errors due to the wrong version being shown is better than no map at all.  +++$+++ :I know that Google Earth won't help.  That was my point.  Also, I pointed out that there was no map until I got to the article.  A map that may have errors due to the wrong version being shown is better than no map at all. [[User:Will Pittenger|Will]] <small>([[User talk:Will Pittenger|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Will Pittenger|contribs]])</small> 20:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

546134 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546134 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-20 06:15:00 +++$+++ 1.253452500E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, I'll certainly take a look at that article, though I wonder whether editing it is a good idea now that a legal case has started. But I'll look at the issues, anyway, and if I feel I can contribute positively (and safely), I'll do so. <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ Hi Tim, I'll certainly take a look at that article, though I wonder whether editing it is a good idea now that a legal case has started. But I'll look at the issues, anyway, and if I feel I can contribute positively (and safely), I'll do so. <font color="green">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="pink">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|contribs]]</font></sup></small> 06:15, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
546135 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546134 +++$+++ 546134 +++$+++ 2009-09-20 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.253453340E09 +++$+++ Glancing at the lead, the \"unscrupulous purveyors\" quote, and the source, I would remove that for sure, because the source doesn't quite say it. Even if he did, it would not be good for the lead based on one source. But he's quoting someone else, and that second person is using it as a sort of parody statement. <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :Glancing at the lead, the "unscrupulous purveyors" quote, and the source, I would remove that for sure, because the source doesn't quite say it. Even if he did, it would not be good for the lead based on one source. But he's quoting someone else, and that second person is using it as a sort of parody statement. <font color="green">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="pink">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|contribs]]</font></sup></small> 06:29, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
546136 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546134 +++$+++ 546134 +++$+++ 2009-09-20 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.253453700E09 +++$+++ I removed it just to be on the safe side. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=American_Academy_of_Anti-Aging_Medicine&curid=5654189&diff=315052972&oldid=314863081] Hope that's okay. <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ :I removed it just to be on the safe side. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_Academy_of_Anti-Aging_Medicine&curid=5654189&diff=315052972&oldid=314863081] Hope that's okay. <font color="green">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="pink">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|contribs]]</font></sup></small> 06:35, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

21847 +++$+++ Karljoos +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21847 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-10 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.252635180E09 +++$+++ It's OK to say that she was a virtuoso performer when you source it. The problem is the \"she's considered\". Please visit [[Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words]]. Maybe you could just say \"she was a virtuso (...) performer\". Cheers -- +++$+++ It's OK to say that she was a virtuoso performer when you source it. The problem is the "she's considered". Please visit [[Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words]]. Maybe you could just say "she was a virtuso (...) performer". Cheers --[[User:Karljoos|Karljoos]] ([[User talk:Karljoos|talk]]) 19:13, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
21848 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21847 +++$+++ 21847 +++$+++ 2009-09-10 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.252636140E09 +++$+++ I've simplified it to \"was a virtuoso performer of ... \", removing the \"is said to be\" that I had used to replace the previous \"considered\".  +++$+++ :I've simplified it to "was a virtuoso performer of ... ", removing the "is said to be" that I had used to replace the previous "considered". [[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 19:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

283992 +++$+++ Grahamec +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283992 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-29 06:30:00 +++$+++ 1.225287000E09 +++$+++ My concern with rating them B in both cases related to the sourcing of the '''Race''' sections in relation to criterion 1: \"...It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited...\"  No doubt the events as you described it occurred, and some would say there is no controversy so there is no need for references.  If these are taken to [[WP:GAN]], you would be requested to indicate sources for each paragraph I suspect.-- +++$+++ My concern with rating them B in both cases related to the sourcing of the '''Race''' sections in relation to criterion 1: "...It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited..."  No doubt the events as you described it occurred, and some would say there is no controversy so there is no need for references.  If these are taken to [[WP:GAN]], you would be requested to indicate sources for each paragraph I suspect.--[[User:Grahamec|Grahame]] ([[User talk:Grahamec|talk]]) 06:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
283993 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283992 +++$+++ 283992 +++$+++ 2008-11-05 11:09:00 +++$+++ 1.225912140E09 +++$+++ Bring it up at the wiki-project, or just revert them. -- +++$+++ :Bring it up at the wiki-project, or just revert them. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 11:09, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
283994 +++$+++ Esradekan +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283992 +++$+++ 283993 +++$+++ 2008-11-05 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.225912680E09 +++$+++ I was planning on reverting them, but I do try to find a policy or guideline to quote in the Edit Summary. You know, kinda covers your ass and all that. [[Wikipedia:Listcruft]] looks good, but it's only an essay. The project page seems like a good idea, cheers for that. <small> +++$+++ ::I was planning on reverting them, but I do try to find a policy or guideline to quote in the Edit Summary. You know, kinda covers your ass and all that. [[Wikipedia:Listcruft]] looks good, but it's only an essay. The project page seems like a good idea, cheers for that. <small>[[User:Esradekan|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"><font style="color:gold;background:navy;">'''&nbsp;Esradekan Gibb&nbsp;'''</font></span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Esradekan|<font size="-4" color="Navy">'''"Talk"'''</font>]]</sup></small> 11:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

283995 +++$+++ Diniz +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283995 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-20 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.227245520E09 +++$+++ Hi Falcadore.  I have just got round to updating the blank International F3000 results table in my [[User:Diniz\/Reference|reference user subpage]] to reflect the changes you made to the F3000 season articles a while ago.  I was wondering if you have a preferred abbreviation for Brands Hatch, as it's now the only venue in the table to be represented by two letters instead of three?  I think my choice would be BHT, but I thought I should get a second opinion.--<font face=\"Forte\"> +++$+++ Hi Falcadore.  I have just got round to updating the blank International F3000 results table in my [[User:Diniz/Reference|reference user subpage]] to reflect the changes you made to the F3000 season articles a while ago.  I was wondering if you have a preferred abbreviation for Brands Hatch, as it's now the only venue in the table to be represented by two letters instead of three?  I think my choice would be BHT, but I thought I should get a second opinion.--<font face="Forte">[[User:Diniz|<span style="color:#FFFF00;background:black">Diniz</span>]][[User talk:Diniz|<span style="color:#000000;background:yellow">(talk)</span>]]</font> 21:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
283996 +++$+++  +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 283995 +++$+++ 283995 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ OK, I'll use your suggestion.  On the plus side, that's every International F3000 abbreviation now covered, and it won't become a problem ever again as the series no longer exists. ;) 21:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC) +++$+++ :OK, I'll use your suggestion.  On the plus side, that's every International F3000 abbreviation now covered, and it won't become a problem ever again as the series no longer exists. ;) 21:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

546142 +++$+++ 71.105.255.183 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546142 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-22 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.253611740E09 +++$+++ See http:\/\/www.nutraingredients-usa.com\/Research\/Could-soy-isoflavones-extend-life . Isn't this what the essence of my SOD\/CAT article two months ago.  While this may not improve my chances for publishing an article on wikipedia, I must say, it certainly improves my mood to say, \" I told you so.\" [[Special:Contributions\/71.105.255.183|71.105.255.183]] ( +++$+++ See http://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/Research/Could-soy-isoflavones-extend-life . Isn't this what the essence of my SOD/CAT article two months ago.  While this may not improve my chances for publishing an article on wikipedia, I must say, it certainly improves my mood to say, " I told you so." [[Special:Contributions/71.105.255.183|71.105.255.183]] ([[User talk:71.105.255.183|talk]]) 02:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
546143 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546142 +++$+++ 546142 +++$+++ 2009-09-24 03:12:00 +++$+++ 1.253787120E09 +++$+++ If you register an account, I could copy the deleted content into your userspace, so you could work on it at your leisure.  +++$+++ :If you register an account, I could copy the deleted content into your userspace, so you could work on it at your leisure. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 03:12, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

284002 +++$+++ Wikigi +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-08 10:50:00 +++$+++ 1.228762200E09 +++$+++ You really consider a kart powered by a 29 hp Rotax Max engine to be a Superkart? Or a 80 cc kart? I know it is listed as such in Australia but if you see such a kart running on long circuit it is sort of a joke don't you think? -  +++$+++ You really consider a kart powered by a 29 hp Rotax Max engine to be a Superkart? Or a 80 cc kart? I know it is listed as such in Australia but if you see such a kart running on long circuit it is sort of a joke don't you think? - [[User:Wikigi|Wikigi]] | [[User talk:Wikigi|talk to me]] | 10:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
284003 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284002 +++$+++ 284002 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.228762260E09 +++$+++ My opinion is irrelevant next to the facts. -- +++$+++ :My opinion is irrelevant next to the facts. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 10:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
284004 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284002 +++$+++ 284002 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.228830660E09 +++$+++ Well, actually, I am in a small capacity but that is not important, - it's not V8 Supercar that keeps the records, but CAMS. And CAMS did not make that 'decision'. V8 Supercar does not have the power to alter seven year old records. But seeing as you can see through internet IDs and tell who is who you'd know all that hey? -- +++$+++ :Well, actually, I am in a small capacity but that is not important, - it's not V8 Supercar that keeps the records, but CAMS. And CAMS did not make that 'decision'. V8 Supercar does not have the power to alter seven year old records. But seeing as you can see through internet IDs and tell who is who you'd know all that hey? --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 05:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
284005 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284002 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-02 02:50:00 +++$+++ 1.235991000E09 +++$+++ Just so you are aware, about 2\/3 weeks ago, VESA's preferred statistician and Channel 7 commentator Aaron Noonan published a historical article in Auto Action list all the V8 Supercar round winners and labelled Skaife at 39 round wins, leaving all the Adelaide results 'unadjusted'. If VESAs quasi-official statastician is not official enough for you, then I don't know what is. -- +++$+++ :::Just so you are aware, about 2/3 weeks ago, VESA's preferred statistician and Channel 7 commentator Aaron Noonan published a historical article in Auto Action list all the V8 Supercar round winners and labelled Skaife at 39 round wins, leaving all the Adelaide results 'unadjusted'. If VESAs quasi-official statastician is not official enough for you, then I don't know what is. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 02:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

21860 +++$+++ 80.177.28.36 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21860 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-16 10:36:00 +++$+++ 1.260988560E09 +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions\/80.177.28.36|80.177.28.36]] ( +++$+++ --[[Special:Contributions/80.177.28.36|80.177.28.36]] ([[User talk:80.177.28.36|talk]]) 10:36, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
21861 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21860 +++$+++ 21860 +++$+++ 2009-12-16 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.260989160E09 +++$+++ What are you referring to? Could you give a link or some clue? If you are asking a general question, please ask at the [[Wikipedia:Village Pump]], maybe the policy section. - +++$+++ :What are you referring to? Could you give a link or some clue? If you are asking a general question, please ask at the [[Wikipedia:Village Pump]], maybe the policy section. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 10:46, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

546150 +++$+++ Aratron of Saturn +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546150 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-28 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.254191100E09 +++$+++ Haagenti was indeed my old account and that would be fantastic if you could do that thanks ^_^ It was only after I lost my password that I realised that I hadn't set up an email address with the account, so there's no way I can get it back unfortunately.   +++$+++ Haagenti was indeed my old account and that would be fantastic if you could do that thanks ^_^ It was only after I lost my password that I realised that I hadn't set up an email address with the account, so there's no way I can get it back unfortunately.  [[User:Aratron of Saturn|Aratron of Saturn]] ([[User talk:Aratron of Saturn|talk]]) 19:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
546151 +++$+++ Aratron of Saturn +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546150 +++$+++ 546150 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.254192000E09 +++$+++ Thank you, I really do appreciate that!  +++$+++ :Thank you, I really do appreciate that! [[User:Aratron of Saturn|Aratron of Saturn]] ([[User talk:Aratron of Saturn|talk]]) 19:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

284007 +++$+++ 97.125.21.179 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284007 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-16 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.232114700E09 +++$+++ Why did you eliminate the link to the last lap footage? It's the only proof that backs up what happened to [[Michael Andretti]]. [[Special:Contributions\/97.125.21.179|97.125.21.179]] ( +++$+++ Why did you eliminate the link to the last lap footage? It's the only proof that backs up what happened to [[Michael Andretti]]. [[Special:Contributions/97.125.21.179|97.125.21.179]] ([[User talk:97.125.21.179|talk]]) 06:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
284008 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284007 +++$+++ 284007 +++$+++ 2009-01-16 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.232126940E09 +++$+++ [[WP:ELNEVER]] -- +++$+++ :[[WP:ELNEVER]] --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 09:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

21864 +++$+++ William M. Connolley +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21864 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-07 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.265581740E09 +++$+++ Oh, and don't worry about the template above :-)  +++$+++ Oh, and don't worry about the template above :-) [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] ([[User talk:William M. Connolley|talk]]) 14:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
21865 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21864 +++$+++ 21864 +++$+++ 2010-02-07 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.265601720E09 +++$+++ I have now read the links you provided. I have added more sources and summaries to [[Talk:Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere#methane-carbon dioxide-water clathrates]] but I still could not find anything more relevant. Maybe a different but sourced claim could be cobbled together? In any case feel free to reinsert the text I moved to Talk with a {{tl|citation needed}}, to increase the chance someone else finds something. - +++$+++ :I have now read the links you provided. I have added more sources and summaries to [[Talk:Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere#methane-carbon dioxide-water clathrates]] but I still could not find anything more relevant. Maybe a different but sourced claim could be cobbled together? In any case feel free to reinsert the text I moved to Talk with a {{tl|citation needed}}, to increase the chance someone else finds something. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 20:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

21866 +++$+++ Rlandmann +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21866 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-20 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.266669600E09 +++$+++ Cheers -- +++$+++ Cheers --[[User:Rlandmann|Rlandmann]] ([[User talk:Rlandmann|talk]]) 04:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
21867 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21866 +++$+++ 21866 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 13:39:00 +++$+++ 1.266701940E09 +++$+++ I may have also added similar categories for German and United States. I had several reasons: a reader landing at one of the (very useful by the way) navigation categories cannot otherwise see how to get to any 19th century aircraft (but I just made an edit to [[Template:airntd]] that might improve this); and a reader cannot easily find old aircraft (admittedly the very few balloons and airships with articles). An example of a problem is [[:Category:German aircraft 1900-1909]]: how can a non-expert user intuitively get to [[:Category:19th-century aircraft]]? Somehow we need to provide more help to the reader. I admit categories are not the best nor the full answer when entries get sparse, but they are at least something. Are there other ways to do this? Maybe a shortcut link to the small [[:Category:19th-century aviation]]? - +++$+++ :I may have also added similar categories for German and United States. I had several reasons: a reader landing at one of the (very useful by the way) navigation categories cannot otherwise see how to get to any 19th century aircraft (but I just made an edit to [[Template:airntd]] that might improve this); and a reader cannot easily find old aircraft (admittedly the very few balloons and airships with articles). An example of a problem is [[:Category:German aircraft 1900-1909]]: how can a non-expert user intuitively get to [[:Category:19th-century aircraft]]? Somehow we need to provide more help to the reader. I admit categories are not the best nor the full answer when entries get sparse, but they are at least something. Are there other ways to do this? Maybe a shortcut link to the small [[:Category:19th-century aviation]]? -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 13:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
21868 +++$+++ Rlandmann +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21866 +++$+++ 21867 +++$+++ 2010-02-20 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.266703440E09 +++$+++ I saw your edit to Airntd \u2014 thanks! This will help a lot. Thanks too for pointing out the 19th-century hole in the top layer of country categories; I've fixed that and hopefully the accompanying template too. I'm trying to think through ways to further bolster up the navigational templates; I agree that these are really handy and complement the category \"plumbing\" very well. Cheers -- +++$+++ ::I saw your edit to Airntd — thanks! This will help a lot. Thanks too for pointing out the 19th-century hole in the top layer of country categories; I've fixed that and hopefully the accompanying template too. I'm trying to think through ways to further bolster up the navigational templates; I agree that these are really handy and complement the category "plumbing" very well. Cheers --[[User:Rlandmann|Rlandmann]] ([[User talk:Rlandmann|talk]]) 14:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

47335 +++$+++ Quale +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47335 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-24 02:56:00 +++$+++ 1.209030960E09 +++$+++ You should use the \"Move\" tab to move a page\u2014copy and paste is suboptimal.  See [[WP:MOVE]] and [[WP:CPMV]].  Basically copy-and-paste loses\/obfuscates the page history, which is unfortunate.  We should probably repair this.  I don't have any experience doing it, but we have editors like [[User:Sjakkalle]] who I think do.   +++$+++ You should use the "Move" tab to move a page—copy and paste is suboptimal.  See [[WP:MOVE]] and [[WP:CPMV]].  Basically copy-and-paste loses/obfuscates the page history, which is unfortunate.  We should probably repair this.  I don't have any experience doing it, but we have editors like [[User:Sjakkalle]] who I think do.  [[User:Quale|Quale]] ([[User talk:Quale|talk]]) 02:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
47336 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47335 +++$+++ 47335 +++$+++ 2008-04-24 03:05:00 +++$+++ 1.209031500E09 +++$+++ Yes, I've been getting multiple messages advising me of this. I have moved the article and talk page back, and put in redirects at the intended new article and talk page for the time being. I will see if I can get Sjakkalle or someone to help me with this.  Thanks (to you and others who apprised me of my blunder).  +++$+++ :Yes, I've been getting multiple messages advising me of this. I have moved the article and talk page back, and put in redirects at the intended new article and talk page for the time being. I will see if I can get Sjakkalle or someone to help me with this.  Thanks (to you and others who apprised me of my blunder). [[User:Krakatoa|Krakatoa]] ([[User talk:Krakatoa#top|talk]]) 03:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

284012 +++$+++ Petera93 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284012 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-01 17:06:00 +++$+++ 1.235955960E09 +++$+++ All of the drivers on this list are confirmed and are not rumours. We are still waiting for conformation that Adapta will enter as a manufacturer team. If they are not confirmed, then I will move them below into the 'Regular Entries Not Registered as Manufacturers' section.  +++$+++ All of the drivers on this list are confirmed and are not rumours. We are still waiting for conformation that Adapta will enter as a manufacturer team. If they are not confirmed, then I will move them below into the 'Regular Entries Not Registered as Manufacturers' section. [[User:Petera93|Petera93]] ([[User talk:Petera93|talk]]) 17:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
284013 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284012 +++$+++ 284012 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 23:51:00 +++$+++ 1.235980260E09 +++$+++ At the time I wrote the request, NONE of them had been sourced with references, confirmed or not. That was the point I was trying to make, some two months ago. -- +++$+++ :At the time I wrote the request, NONE of them had been sourced with references, confirmed or not. That was the point I was trying to make, some two months ago. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 23:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
284014 +++$+++ Petera93 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284012 +++$+++ 284013 +++$+++ 2009-03-06 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.236402420E09 +++$+++ Apologies for not noticing your request earlier. I was the one that had created the driver table, albeit under an IP address, before I became a member. Adapta don't appear to have registered as a manufacturer team, so I have moved them into the section below. Thanks- +++$+++ ::Apologies for not noticing your request earlier. I was the one that had created the driver table, albeit under an IP address, before I became a member. Adapta don't appear to have registered as a manufacturer team, so I have moved them into the section below. Thanks-[[User:Petera93|Petera93]] ([[User talk:Petera93|talk]]) 21:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

21870 +++$+++ Trev_M +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21870 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-16 00:18:00 +++$+++ 1.268723880E09 +++$+++ Hooke has 13 images (I counted). Personally I would prefer them to be governed down in some way, as none are particularly vital to the article. I will put a note in that page talk as well. <span style=\"font-family: 'Brush script MT', cursive;font-size:1.5em;vertical-align:middle;\">  +++$+++ Hooke has 13 images (I counted). Personally I would prefer them to be governed down in some way, as none are particularly vital to the article. I will put a note in that page talk as well. <span style="font-family: 'Brush script MT', cursive;font-size:1.5em;vertical-align:middle;"> [[User:Trev M| Trev M ]] [[User_talk:Trev_M| ~&nbsp; ]]</span> 00:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
21871 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21870 +++$+++ 21870 +++$+++ 2010-03-16 03:58:00 +++$+++ 1.268737080E09 +++$+++ - +++$+++ :-[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 03:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

284016 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-02 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.236008160E09 +++$+++ Was you mean. Remember, defunct. And there's still no such country as Great Australia. -- +++$+++ Was you mean. Remember, defunct. And there's still no such country as Great Australia. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 07:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
284017 +++$+++ Donnie Park +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284016 +++$+++ 284016 +++$+++ 2009-03-02 07:59:00 +++$+++ 1.236009540E09 +++$+++ I apologise for that, it was just some cut-and-paste job that went wrong - I should had pasted Australia over \"Great Britain\".  +++$+++ :I apologise for that, it was just some cut-and-paste job that went wrong - I should had pasted Australia over "Great Britain". [[User:Donnie Park|Donnie Park]] ([[User talk:Donnie Park|talk]]) 07:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

21873 +++$+++ Pgallert +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21873 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-21 15:04:00 +++$+++ 1.274479440E09 +++$+++ Hi 84, I converted your disambig page into a redirect to [[Internet Key Exchange]] because the term \"Internet Key\" does not appear in the main article linked, [[USB flash drive]]. Please provide coverage and sources in the main article, or write a separate article about the product. Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi 84, I converted your disambig page into a redirect to [[Internet Key Exchange]] because the term "Internet Key" does not appear in the main article linked, [[USB flash drive]]. Please provide coverage and sources in the main article, or write a separate article about the product. Thanks, [[User:Pgallert|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert|talk]]) 15:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
21874 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21873 +++$+++ 21873 +++$+++ 2010-05-21 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.274502180E09 +++$+++ - +++$+++ :-[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 21:23, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

284018 +++$+++ Paul foord +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284018 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-09 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.236618840E09 +++$+++ I tried to draw existing material together to create [[Ford Falcon GT]], the Holden fans\/editors have certainly done a more thorough job than the Ford fans. The [[Ford Falcon (Australia)]] article does not draw it together unfortunately. The XY GT & XY GT HO Phase III articles are duplicates.  +++$+++ I tried to draw existing material together to create [[Ford Falcon GT]], the Holden fans/editors have certainly done a more thorough job than the Ford fans. The [[Ford Falcon (Australia)]] article does not draw it together unfortunately. The XY GT & XY GT HO Phase III articles are duplicates. [[User:Paul foord|Paul foord]] ([[User talk:Paul foord|talk]]) 10:14, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
284019 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284018 +++$+++ 284018 +++$+++ 2009-03-10 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.236715380E09 +++$+++ Not taken over. TDR is operating the RNR franchise. Basically RNR is just the paperwork, and all over their existing equipment has been sold off or is for sale. Plus there is [http:\/\/www.tonyd.com.au\/ TDR's official website]. -- +++$+++ :Not taken over. TDR is operating the RNR franchise. Basically RNR is just the paperwork, and all over their existing equipment has been sold off or is for sale. Plus there is [http://www.tonyd.com.au/ TDR's official website]. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 13:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

21875 +++$+++ 195.241.69.171 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21875 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-24 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.274728020E09 +++$+++ I'm interested in knowing why you think usage by non-Dutch people, who routinely get the use of tussenvoegsels wrong, are more reputable sources on how to write Dutch names than the actual official Dutch name grammar rules. Why do you think this is a matter of style or choice? There's one correct way to write Dutch names, and that's to capitalize the first tussenvoegsel unless it's preceded by a first name or initials. [http:\/\/www.onzetaal.nl\/advies\/tussenvoegsel.php] And hey, maybe I'm wrong about this, but it seems to me that unless you're transliterating from a non-latin script language, you can't just ignore important grammatical rules because a bunch of people who don't know what they're doing think it's the correct thing to do. [[Special:Contributions\/195.241.69.171|195.241.69.171]] ( +++$+++ I'm interested in knowing why you think usage by non-Dutch people, who routinely get the use of tussenvoegsels wrong, are more reputable sources on how to write Dutch names than the actual official Dutch name grammar rules. Why do you think this is a matter of style or choice? There's one correct way to write Dutch names, and that's to capitalize the first tussenvoegsel unless it's preceded by a first name or initials. [http://www.onzetaal.nl/advies/tussenvoegsel.php] And hey, maybe I'm wrong about this, but it seems to me that unless you're transliterating from a non-latin script language, you can't just ignore important grammatical rules because a bunch of people who don't know what they're doing think it's the correct thing to do. [[Special:Contributions/195.241.69.171|195.241.69.171]] ([[User talk:195.241.69.171|talk]]) 12:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
21876 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21875 +++$+++ 21875 +++$+++ 2010-05-24 21:02:00 +++$+++ 1.274760120E09 +++$+++ I do not think that usage by one group is any more reputable than that by any other group. If my post at [[Talk:Van der Waals force#Van should be capitalized unless preceded by first name|Talk:Van der Waals force]] implied this in any way it was not my intention. My post was solely concerned with the name of the ''force'' as it is spelled most commonly in the English language, not the name of the ''person''. How the names of Dutch people are spelled is probably exactly as you explain, but that rule does not necessarily affect the spelling of derived nouns or adjectives. For example, the following should be Ok in English, if rather clunky: \"Since Van der Waals was one of the first to postulate an intermolecular force, such a force is now sometimes called a van der Waals force.\" Wikipedia tries to be descriptive rather than prescriptive in any case, which is why I detailed the results from Google Scholar searched from 1900 up to 2009. - +++$+++ :I do not think that usage by one group is any more reputable than that by any other group. If my post at [[Talk:Van der Waals force#Van should be capitalized unless preceded by first name|Talk:Van der Waals force]] implied this in any way it was not my intention. My post was solely concerned with the name of the ''force'' as it is spelled most commonly in the English language, not the name of the ''person''. How the names of Dutch people are spelled is probably exactly as you explain, but that rule does not necessarily affect the spelling of derived nouns or adjectives. For example, the following should be Ok in English, if rather clunky: "Since Van der Waals was one of the first to postulate an intermolecular force, such a force is now sometimes called a van der Waals force." Wikipedia tries to be descriptive rather than prescriptive in any case, which is why I detailed the results from Google Scholar searched from 1900 up to 2009. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 21:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

284021 +++$+++ Petera93 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284021 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-26 18:37:00 +++$+++ 1.238117820E09 +++$+++ If Bright should be shown as part of SBR, surely this needs to be shown on the teams template as well. I changed the table because I saw the teams were seperate on the template, and Bright is shown as a Britek driver on his article. Alternatively, maybe we could have two columns for teams-one showing names such as Triple Eight and Kelly Racing, and another column with the 'official' team names shown on the entry lists, or the teams and drivers page on the official website, like TeamVodafone and Jack Daniels etc. Thanks  +++$+++ If Bright should be shown as part of SBR, surely this needs to be shown on the teams template as well. I changed the table because I saw the teams were seperate on the template, and Bright is shown as a Britek driver on his article. Alternatively, maybe we could have two columns for teams-one showing names such as Triple Eight and Kelly Racing, and another column with the 'official' team names shown on the entry lists, or the teams and drivers page on the official website, like TeamVodafone and Jack Daniels etc. Thanks [[User:Petera93|Petera93]] ([[User talk:Petera93|talk]]) 18:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
284022 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284021 +++$+++ 284021 +++$+++ 2009-03-27 08:42:00 +++$+++ 1.238168520E09 +++$+++ i believe Britek should be listed as SBR, Rod Nash Racing as Tony D'Alberto Racing, the Dean Fiore's car as Paul Morris Motorsport, because that is what the teams actually is. Other editors believe otherwise. As for the temporary sponsor names which change year to year, i am ambivalent towards them so long as the team articles remain generically named. -- +++$+++ :i believe Britek should be listed as SBR, Rod Nash Racing as Tony D'Alberto Racing, the Dean Fiore's car as Paul Morris Motorsport, because that is what the teams actually is. Other editors believe otherwise. As for the temporary sponsor names which change year to year, i am ambivalent towards them so long as the team articles remain generically named. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 08:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

284023 +++$+++ Petera93 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-01 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.238645100E09 +++$+++ I was wondering why the BTCC and V8 Supercar operations of Triple Eight need to be on seperate pages. I think it would be better if they were in seperate sections of the same page. I was wondering if you might want to join me in suggesting these pages should be merged, or do you know if they were seperated for a reason? If you could leave a reply on my talk page that would be much appreciated. Thanks  +++$+++ I was wondering why the BTCC and V8 Supercar operations of Triple Eight need to be on seperate pages. I think it would be better if they were in seperate sections of the same page. I was wondering if you might want to join me in suggesting these pages should be merged, or do you know if they were seperated for a reason? If you could leave a reply on my talk page that would be much appreciated. Thanks [[User:Petera93|Petera93]] ([[User talk:Petera93|talk]]) 21:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
284024 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284023 +++$+++ 284023 +++$+++ 2009-04-01 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.238645520E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid I'd have to oppose such a move. Would you also suggest that the Holden Racing Team should be included on pages for Tom Walkinshaw Racing or should Ford Performance Racing be included on Prodrive's page? Apart from ownership the two teams have nothing in common. -- +++$+++ :I'm afraid I'd have to oppose such a move. Would you also suggest that the Holden Racing Team should be included on pages for Tom Walkinshaw Racing or should Ford Performance Racing be included on Prodrive's page? Apart from ownership the two teams have nothing in common. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 21:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
284025 +++$+++ Petera93 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284023 +++$+++ 284024 +++$+++ 2009-04-02 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.238721000E09 +++$+++ OK, thanks, I wasn't sure whether maybe they had a bit more in common. I'm happy to leave them as seperate articles if they're better that way. Thanks  +++$+++ ::OK, thanks, I wasn't sure whether maybe they had a bit more in common. I'm happy to leave them as seperate articles if they're better that way. Thanks [[User:Petera93|Petera93]] ([[User talk:Petera93|talk]]) 18:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

21881 +++$+++ Wickethewok +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21881 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-16 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.276750200E09 +++$+++ I originally uploaded it (according to the logs) on 8 October 2006 to English Wikipedia (with dual licensing) and a couple years later the full track was released on Bonzai.  Hope this answers your questions.  If you wouldn't mind changing the description on Commons, that'd be great! :-)   +++$+++ I originally uploaded it (according to the logs) on 8 October 2006 to English Wikipedia (with dual licensing) and a couple years later the full track was released on Bonzai.  Hope this answers your questions.  If you wouldn't mind changing the description on Commons, that'd be great! :-)  [[User:Wickethewok|Wickethewok]] ([[User talk:Wickethewok|talk]]) 21:50, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
21882 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21881 +++$+++ 21881 +++$+++ 2010-06-16 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.276751820E09 +++$+++ Done ([http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=File:Amidst_the_Raindrops_clip.ogg&diff=40558000&oldid=26073107 here]) and thanks for the fast reply. I now suspect the clip was \"copied\" from the English wikipedia to the Ukrainian wikipedia where the upload bot then transferred it to Commons thereby losing the older English wikipedia details. - +++$+++ :Done ([http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Amidst_the_Raindrops_clip.ogg&diff=40558000&oldid=26073107 here]) and thanks for the fast reply. I now suspect the clip was "copied" from the English wikipedia to the Ukrainian wikipedia where the upload bot then transferred it to Commons thereby losing the older English wikipedia details. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 22:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
21883 +++$+++ Wickethewok +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21881 +++$+++ 21881 +++$+++ 2010-06-17 03:36:00 +++$+++ 1.276770960E09 +++$+++ Thanks!   +++$+++ *Thanks!  [[User:Wickethewok|Wickethewok]] ([[User talk:Wickethewok|talk]]) 03:36, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

284027 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-13 00:58:00 +++$+++ 1.239609480E09 +++$+++ What exactly is your objection? -- +++$+++ What exactly is your objection? --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore|talk]]) 00:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
284028 +++$+++ Postlebury +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284027 +++$+++ 284027 +++$+++ 2009-04-13 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.239610800E09 +++$+++ No it doesn't because one can't tell what other factors moved the attendance up or down. There may have been five factors that increased the attendance by an aggregate 100,000 counterbalanced by another five factors that reduced it by 100,500. Out of the negative aggregate of 100,500 (or 612 or 43,321 or whatever) the amount attributable to the removal of the V8 Supercar race may have been 100,500 or it may have been zero, or anything inbetween. There is simply no way to tell, but the phrase I removed implies that all or nearly all of it was. That is editorialising on the basis of circumstantial evidence, or to put it another way, it is POV.  +++$+++ :No it doesn't because one can't tell what other factors moved the attendance up or down. There may have been five factors that increased the attendance by an aggregate 100,000 counterbalanced by another five factors that reduced it by 100,500. Out of the negative aggregate of 100,500 (or 612 or 43,321 or whatever) the amount attributable to the removal of the V8 Supercar race may have been 100,500 or it may have been zero, or anything inbetween. There is simply no way to tell, but the phrase I removed implies that all or nearly all of it was. That is editorialising on the basis of circumstantial evidence, or to put it another way, it is POV. [[User:Postlebury|Postlebury]] ([[User talk:Postlebury#top|talk]]) 01:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
284029 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284027 +++$+++ 284028 +++$+++ 2009-04-13 01:40:00 +++$+++ 1.239612000E09 +++$+++ My original point was that the attendance would drop was an unsupported assertion. Whether there were other factors at play is not relevant to the fact that the original line about that the V8 Supercars would cause an attendance drop was completely unsupported with any evidence. If you want to be POV, then BOTH halves of the sentence needs to be withdrawn. -- +++$+++ ::My original point was that the attendance would drop was an unsupported assertion. Whether there were other factors at play is not relevant to the fact that the original line about that the V8 Supercars would cause an attendance drop was completely unsupported with any evidence. If you want to be POV, then BOTH halves of the sentence needs to be withdrawn. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 01:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

546172 +++$+++ Sebastiangarth +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546172 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-30 20:33:00 +++$+++ 1.256959980E09 +++$+++ Tim, your recent edit [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Vaccine_controversy&oldid=322982333 here] was both thoughtful and an accurate representation of the cited sources. Well done. There has been much debate over that one sentence, but your edit seems to strike a perfect balance that should, hopefully, satisfy everyone's expectations. Cheers.  +++$+++ Tim, your recent edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vaccine_controversy&oldid=322982333 here] was both thoughtful and an accurate representation of the cited sources. Well done. There has been much debate over that one sentence, but your edit seems to strike a perfect balance that should, hopefully, satisfy everyone's expectations. Cheers. [[User:Sebastiangarth|Sebastian Garth]] ([[User talk:Sebastiangarth|talk]]) 20:33, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
546173 +++$+++ Eubulides +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546172 +++$+++ 546172 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.256960220E09 +++$+++ Could you please follow up at [[Talk:Vaccine controversy #Attribution]]?  +++$+++ : Could you please follow up at [[Talk:Vaccine controversy #Attribution]]? [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] ([[User talk:Eubulides|talk]]) 20:37, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

21885 +++$+++ FrederickFolger +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21885 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-20 14:32:00 +++$+++ 1.277069520E09 +++$+++ Interesting illustration on the PrIze law page of a Zeppelin taking a Norwegian vessel as a prize in 1917.  I wonder whether you could point me to a source for more information on this incident?  +++$+++ Interesting illustration on the PrIze law page of a Zeppelin taking a Norwegian vessel as a prize in 1917.  I wonder whether you could point me to a source for more information on this incident? [[User:FrederickFolger|FrederickFolger]] ([[User talk:FrederickFolger|talk]]) 14:32, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
21886 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21885 +++$+++ 21885 +++$+++ 2010-06-20 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.277087700E09 +++$+++ Replied with sources at your talk page. - +++$+++ :Replied with sources at your talk page. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 19:35, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

284030 +++$+++  +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284030 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -G3, 04:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC) +++$+++ -G3, 04:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
284031 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284030 +++$+++ 284030 +++$+++ 2009-04-15 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.239797460E09 +++$+++ I also believe this is a discussion better served by Wikipedia: Motorsport, than the two of us however and am willing to defer to their judgement. -- +++$+++ :I also believe this is a discussion better served by Wikipedia: Motorsport, than the two of us however and am willing to defer to their judgement. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 05:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

284032 +++$+++ Cs-wolves +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284032 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-06 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.241666460E09 +++$+++ I am in the situation that I agree with you on this. There is really not point in the template, when there is already a category of all the 2009 motorsport articles. Plus, they will all be implemented into the List of 2009 motorsport champions when the championships are won. Just my two cents. <font face=\"Zemestro\"> +++$+++ I am in the situation that I agree with you on this. There is really not point in the template, when there is already a category of all the 2009 motorsport articles. Plus, they will all be implemented into the List of 2009 motorsport champions when the championships are won. Just my two cents. <font face="Zemestro">[[User:Cs-wolves|<span style="color:black;background:gold">Cs-wolves</span>]][[User talk:Cs-wolves|<span style="color:#00FF00;background:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</font> 20:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
284033 +++$+++ Cs-wolves +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284032 +++$+++ 284032 +++$+++ 2009-05-07 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.241722680E09 +++$+++ Yep, I agree. I'll let you bring it up, as you were the first to have those particular thoughts about the template. I mean, the template could be thirty-deep if most of the series list on the [[List of 2008 motorsport champions]] page were listed on the 2009 motorsport template. <font face=\"Zemestro\"> +++$+++ :Yep, I agree. I'll let you bring it up, as you were the first to have those particular thoughts about the template. I mean, the template could be thirty-deep if most of the series list on the [[List of 2008 motorsport champions]] page were listed on the 2009 motorsport template. <font face="Zemestro">[[User:Cs-wolves|<span style="color:black;background:gold">Cs-wolves</span>]][[User talk:Cs-wolves|<span style="color:#00FF00;background:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</font> 11:58, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

21889 +++$+++ Clarityfiend +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21889 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-08 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.281256560E09 +++$+++ <div class=\"floatleft\" style=\"margin-bottom:0\">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]<\/div>I have nominated [[Gangway (disambiguation)]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Gangway (disambiguation)]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning -->  +++$+++ <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[Gangway (disambiguation)]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gangway (disambiguation)]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 01:36, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
21890 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21889 +++$+++ 21889 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.281730200E09 +++$+++ Replied [[Talk:Biometrics#Concerning: It contains too many quotations for an encyclopedic entry.|there]]. - +++$+++ :Replied [[Talk:Biometrics#Concerning: It contains too many quotations for an encyclopedic entry.|there]]. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 13:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

284035 +++$+++ Kaiwhakahaere +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284035 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-26 04:04:00 +++$+++ 1.243335840E09 +++$+++ and Frank Matich's fastest lap of 1'26.2. Was it bucketing down for the race, or something?  Cheers  +++$+++ and Frank Matich's fastest lap of 1'26.2. Was it bucketing down for the race, or something?  Cheers [[User:Kaiwhakahaere|Kaiwhakahaere]] ([[User talk:Kaiwhakahaere|talk]]) 04:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
284036 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284035 +++$+++ 284035 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 04:06:00 +++$+++ 1.243335960E09 +++$+++ Will confirm. -- +++$+++ :Will confirm. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 04:06, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
284037 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284035 +++$+++ 284035 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.243374300E09 +++$+++ The race was actually wet, but the pole time was wrong too. Pole was not diceded by a qualifying session. -- +++$+++ :The race was actually wet, but the pole time was wrong too. Pole was not diceded by a qualifying session. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 14:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

21892 +++$+++ Cgingold +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21892 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-24 23:50:00 +++$+++ 1.282719000E09 +++$+++ Hi, I just came across [[:Category:Historical scientific instruments]], where you added {{tl|category tree all}} a while back, configured to display ''all parent categories''. Could you explain why you thought that was needed? I am really scratching my head about it, given that ''all of the parent categories'' are always displayed at the bottom of every Category page. Please respond at my talk page, thanks.  +++$+++ Hi, I just came across [[:Category:Historical scientific instruments]], where you added {{tl|category tree all}} a while back, configured to display ''all parent categories''. Could you explain why you thought that was needed? I am really scratching my head about it, given that ''all of the parent categories'' are always displayed at the bottom of every Category page. Please respond at my talk page, thanks. [[User:Cgingold|Cgingold]] ([[User talk:Cgingold|talk]]) 23:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
21893 +++$+++ Cgingold +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21892 +++$+++ 21892 +++$+++ 2010-08-25 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.282728900E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply, 84user. I'm afraid I still have no idea why you would think it was ever needed on any Category page, since, as I said, ''all of the parent categories are always displayed at the bottom of every Category page''. I've removed it from the two pages that you referenced; if you know of any others, they should be removed as well. Cheers,  +++$+++ :Thanks for your reply, 84user. I'm afraid I still have no idea why you would think it was ever needed on any Category page, since, as I said, ''all of the parent categories are always displayed at the bottom of every Category page''. I've removed it from the two pages that you referenced; if you know of any others, they should be removed as well. Cheers, [[User:Cgingold|Cgingold]] ([[User talk:Cgingold|talk]]) 02:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

284038 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-26 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.243349220E09 +++$+++ That's not really what I meant - but on reflection, you're probably right anyway. Cheers.  +++$+++ That's not really what I meant - but on reflection, you're probably right anyway. Cheers. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] ([[User talk:4u1e|talk]]) 07:47, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
284039 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284038 +++$+++ 284038 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.243372020E09 +++$+++ It looked better than the version [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Monaco_Grand_Prix&oldid=292278168 here] with the {{{}}} all over the infobox. -- +++$+++ : It looked better than the version [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monaco_Grand_Prix&oldid=292278168 here] with the {{{}}} all over the infobox. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 14:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
284040 +++$+++ 4u1e +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284038 +++$+++ 284039 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 16:37:00 +++$+++ 1.243381020E09 +++$+++ True.  +++$+++ ::True. [[User:4u1e|4u1e]] ([[User talk:4u1e|talk]]) 16:37, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

21895 +++$+++ Angusmclellan +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21895 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-25 12:26:00 +++$+++ 1.285442760E09 +++$+++ Thoughts?  +++$+++ Thoughts? [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]]  [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 12:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
21896 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21895 +++$+++ 21895 +++$+++ 2010-09-25 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.285460400E09 +++$+++ Wikimedia Commons also deals with problems of images from films, for examples see [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Search?search=film&prefix=Commons_talk%3ALicensing%2F&fulltext=Search+Talk+archives&fulltext=Search these archived discussions], but I become more and more convinced that tagging images as \"PD\" will only work with explicit citations on a case by case basis. - +++$+++ :Wikimedia Commons also deals with problems of images from films, for examples see [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=film&prefix=Commons_talk%3ALicensing%2F&fulltext=Search+Talk+archives&fulltext=Search these archived discussions], but I become more and more convinced that tagging images as "PD" will only work with explicit citations on a case by case basis. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 17:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

47340 +++$+++ Peter Ballard +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47340 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-27 07:53:00 +++$+++ 1.209307980E09 +++$+++ After a ref to \"The World's Great Chess Games\", [[Reuben Fine]], (McKay, 1976) p.30.\", I notice you've added ''\"However, Fine also regards Staunton, Anderssen, and Morphy as having been \"world champions.\" ''Id.'', pp.3-4.\"''. I can't find that in my copy... could you give me a quote, or section title, so I can locate it? I'm also a bit surpised that Fine woul say that, since he has comments which sort of say the opposite, e.g. on Anderssen (p.14 in my copy), Fine writes, \"Anderssen was now the unofficial world champion; the title was not yet in existence\".  +++$+++ After a ref to "The World's Great Chess Games", [[Reuben Fine]], (McKay, 1976) p.30.", I notice you've added ''"However, Fine also regards Staunton, Anderssen, and Morphy as having been "world champions." ''Id.'', pp.3-4."''. I can't find that in my copy... could you give me a quote, or section title, so I can locate it? I'm also a bit surpised that Fine woul say that, since he has comments which sort of say the opposite, e.g. on Anderssen (p.14 in my copy), Fine writes, "Anderssen was now the unofficial world champion; the title was not yet in existence". [[User:Peter Ballard|Peter Ballard]] ([[User talk:Peter Ballard|talk]]) 07:53, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
47341 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47340 +++$+++ 47340 +++$+++ 2008-04-27 16:02:00 +++$+++ 1.209337320E09 +++$+++ Woops -- I think I cited the wrong book.  The book I meant to cite is not Fine's ''The World's Great Chess Games'', but rather Fine's ''Great Moments in Modern Chess'', Dover Publications, 1965 (a verbatim reprint of ''The World's a Chessboard'', David McKay, 1948). Chapter 1, beginning on page 1, is entitled, \"The World's a Chessboard.\" Starting with the last two words on page 3, Fine writes, \"Of the eight world champions of the past hundred years (Staunton, Anderssen, Morphy, Steinitz, Lasker, Capablanca, Alekhine and Euwe) all have been men considerably above the intellectual average.\" ''Id.'' at 3-4. [[User:Krakatoa|Krakatoa]] ([[User talk:Krakatoa#top|talk]]) 15:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)  +++$+++ :Woops -- I think I cited the wrong book.  The book I meant to cite is not Fine's ''The World's Great Chess Games'', but rather Fine's ''Great Moments in Modern Chess'', Dover Publications, 1965 (a verbatim reprint of ''The World's a Chessboard'', David McKay, 1948). Chapter 1, beginning on page 1, is entitled, "The World's a Chessboard." Starting with the last two words on page 3, Fine writes, "Of the eight world champions of the past hundred years (Staunton, Anderssen, Morphy, Steinitz, Lasker, Capablanca, Alekhine and Euwe) all have been men considerably above the intellectual average." ''Id.'' at 3-4. [[User:Krakatoa|Krakatoa]] ([[User talk:Krakatoa#top|talk]]) 15:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC) [[User:Krakatoa|Krakatoa]] ([[User talk:Krakatoa#top|talk]]) 16:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

21898 +++$+++ Mzilikazi1939 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21898 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-18 20:32:00 +++$+++ 1.290141120E09 +++$+++ I can't make head nor tail of the modification to the reference you recently made in the Lion and the Mouse article. Two numbers appear, one sending readers to the Wiki article on the British Cartoon Library, that could more easily done by putting square brackets round the reference in the notes; the other sending readers to a general page rather than directly to the work being discussed. I have (yet again) given a more direct link. Please don't modify this unless you have something additional to add.  +++$+++ I can't make head nor tail of the modification to the reference you recently made in the Lion and the Mouse article. Two numbers appear, one sending readers to the Wiki article on the British Cartoon Library, that could more easily done by putting square brackets round the reference in the notes; the other sending readers to a general page rather than directly to the work being discussed. I have (yet again) given a more direct link. Please don't modify this unless you have something additional to add. [[User:Mzilikazi1939|Mzilikazi1939]] ([[User talk:Mzilikazi1939|talk]]) 20:32, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
21899 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21898 +++$+++ 21898 +++$+++ 2010-11-19 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.290155520E09 +++$+++ My [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=The_Lion_and_the_Mouse&diff=397418547&oldid=397390420 modifications here] to [[The Lion and the Mouse]] were mainly to use {{tl|cite web}} to help forestall [[WP:LINKROT]]. This method of referencing is pretty standard in wikipedia, but there are alternatives, see [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#Citation styles and consistency]]. The first number linked to http:\/\/www.cartoons.ac.uk\/record\/mudyxm4 with a title of \"View cartoon item: mudyxm4\", followed by an inline link to [[British Cartoon Archive]] as the publisher. The second number links to the general page and I will admit this is probably not necessary, but again I was motivated by the desire to forestall LINKROT as I have seen pages like \"http:\/\/www.cartoons.ac.uk\/record\/mudyxm4\" get renamed or moved and without a context page it can be difficult to recover the specific page. I will leave the page alone for now, but at some time the bare URLs will need to be improved. See [[Wikipedia:Bare URLs]]. I hope this explains my edits. - +++$+++ :My [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Lion_and_the_Mouse&diff=397418547&oldid=397390420 modifications here] to [[The Lion and the Mouse]] were mainly to use {{tl|cite web}} to help forestall [[WP:LINKROT]]. This method of referencing is pretty standard in wikipedia, but there are alternatives, see [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#Citation styles and consistency]]. The first number linked to http://www.cartoons.ac.uk/record/mudyxm4 with a title of "View cartoon item: mudyxm4", followed by an inline link to [[British Cartoon Archive]] as the publisher. The second number links to the general page and I will admit this is probably not necessary, but again I was motivated by the desire to forestall LINKROT as I have seen pages like "http://www.cartoons.ac.uk/record/mudyxm4" get renamed or moved and without a context page it can be difficult to recover the specific page. I will leave the page alone for now, but at some time the bare URLs will need to be improved. See [[Wikipedia:Bare URLs]]. I hope this explains my edits. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 00:32, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

484247 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484247 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-03 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.202083140E09 +++$+++ Minnesota teams continue their tradition of being farm teams for other teams with deeper pockets, or at least the willingness to dig into them. The Twins fans have enjoyed Santana for 8 years. Let's see if he has a few more good years in him. [http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/sports\/baseball\/nl\/mets\/2008-02-02-santana-follow-up_N.htm] The deal is 6 years with an option for a 7th... otherwise known as the \"Santana Clause\". *<:)  +++$+++ Minnesota teams continue their tradition of being farm teams for other teams with deeper pockets, or at least the willingness to dig into them. The Twins fans have enjoyed Santana for 8 years. Let's see if he has a few more good years in him. [http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/nl/mets/2008-02-02-santana-follow-up_N.htm] The deal is 6 years with an option for a 7th... otherwise known as the "Santana Clause". *<:) [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 15:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
484248 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484247 +++$+++ 484247 +++$+++ 2008-02-03 16:06:00 +++$+++ 1.202083560E09 +++$+++ Ha ha!  Well done.  I haven't followed him too closely... what was the explanation for the off-year in 2007?  Hopefully it's just that the Twins in general were no good.  But more losses last season than in any ''two'' of his previous seasons could get me nervous!  \u2014 +++$+++ :Ha ha!  Well done.  I haven't followed him too closely... what was the explanation for the off-year in 2007?  Hopefully it's just that the Twins in general were no good.  But more losses last season than in any ''two'' of his previous seasons could get me nervous!  —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 16:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
484249 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484247 +++$+++ 484248 +++$+++ 2008-02-03 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.202084640E09 +++$+++ The Twins' hitting fell off markedly, and the Twins did not play well for any sustained period. That doesn't account for everything with Santana, of course. I expect him to do well with the Mets. I'm not sure he's worth the money, but who is? However, the Mets are certainly taking a risk, as local commentators were saying -- With pitchers, maybe more than with hitters, they can lose their stuff almost overnight. But we'll see.  +++$+++ ::The Twins' hitting fell off markedly, and the Twins did not play well for any sustained period. That doesn't account for everything with Santana, of course. I expect him to do well with the Mets. I'm not sure he's worth the money, but who is? However, the Mets are certainly taking a risk, as local commentators were saying -- With pitchers, maybe more than with hitters, they can lose their stuff almost overnight. But we'll see. [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 16:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
484250 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484247 +++$+++ 484249 +++$+++ 2008-02-03 16:31:00 +++$+++ 1.202085060E09 +++$+++ Well, we all know what happened to the Mets in 2007.  All they'd done since then was replace their steroid-rage catcher with a not-as-good catcher and lost several players to free agency, so they needed to do something or risk becoming a minor league team themselves!  Pedro is old and possibly broken down, Glavine is gone, Maine was great in April and mediocre the rest of the year, and Oliver Perez is inconsistent at best.  Pile on a trashy bullpen, a closer prone to dead-arm, and most of their power hopes resting on a couple of geriatrics (Alou and Delgado) and it's not a lot of fun to be a Mets fan lately.  I'm getting those feelings I had leading up to 1993.  If they pick up Vince Coleman and Bret Saberhagen, I'm not even watching!  \u2014 +++$+++ :::Well, we all know what happened to the Mets in 2007.  All they'd done since then was replace their steroid-rage catcher with a not-as-good catcher and lost several players to free agency, so they needed to do something or risk becoming a minor league team themselves!  Pedro is old and possibly broken down, Glavine is gone, Maine was great in April and mediocre the rest of the year, and Oliver Perez is inconsistent at best.  Pile on a trashy bullpen, a closer prone to dead-arm, and most of their power hopes resting on a couple of geriatrics (Alou and Delgado) and it's not a lot of fun to be a Mets fan lately.  I'm getting those feelings I had leading up to 1993.  If they pick up Vince Coleman and Bret Saberhagen, I'm not even watching!  —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 16:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
484251 +++$+++ Baseball Bugs +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484247 +++$+++ 484250 +++$+++ 2008-02-03 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.202097960E09 +++$+++ It's amazing how quickly a team's fortunes can fall. Which makes the perpetual contention of certain teams all the more amazing. How do the Yankees manage to stay in the race, year after year? It's not just luck or Yankee mystique. Is it?  +++$+++ ::::It's amazing how quickly a team's fortunes can fall. Which makes the perpetual contention of certain teams all the more amazing. How do the Yankees manage to stay in the race, year after year? It's not just luck or Yankee mystique. Is it? [[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> 20:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

284044 +++$+++ Madhero88 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-03 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.244069640E09 +++$+++ Hi, that was only me being [[WP:BOLD|bold]], because its better not to multi-link as per [[WP:OVERLINK]]. -- +++$+++ Hi, that was only me being [[WP:BOLD|bold]], because its better not to multi-link as per [[WP:OVERLINK]]. --[[user:madhero88|<font color="005F4C"><b>M</b></font><font color="0134B1">aen</font><font color="005F4C"><b>K.</b></font><font color="005F4C"><b>A.</b></font>]][[user_talk:madhero88|<font color="0134B1"><b><sub>Talk</sub></b></font>]] 15:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
284045 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284044 +++$+++ 284044 +++$+++ 2009-06-03 15:58:00 +++$+++ 1.244069880E09 +++$+++ Then the method lacked technique. If removing links surely you preserve the first instance and delete the repeats? Those in tables are worth keeping because they are looked at seperately compared to in-line links. And 'cleanup' doesn't describe anything. -- +++$+++ :Then the method lacked technique. If removing links surely you preserve the first instance and delete the repeats? Those in tables are worth keeping because they are looked at seperately compared to in-line links. And 'cleanup' doesn't describe anything. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 15:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

21904 +++$+++ Maximilian Schönherr +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-15 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.302928440E09 +++$+++ hi, i'm the one who uploaded the airship battle sequence from 1918 (article [[Airship]]). the german subtitle talks about a \"Fesselballon\" - which, i think, is \"Observation balloon\" in english. why ''kite''? you're probably more knowledgeable about this topic than me, so please feel free to edit my english description of the photo. thx,  +++$+++ hi, i'm the one who uploaded the airship battle sequence from 1918 (article [[Airship]]). the german subtitle talks about a "Fesselballon" - which, i think, is "Observation balloon" in english. why ''kite''? you're probably more knowledgeable about this topic than me, so please feel free to edit my english description of the photo. thx, [[User:Maximilian Schönherr|Maximilian Schönherr]] ([[User talk:Maximilian Schönherr|talk]]) 21:34, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
21905 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21904 +++$+++ 21904 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 09:50:00 +++$+++ 1.303145400E09 +++$+++ Well, ''Fesselballon'' translates to \"tethered balloon\", from the German verb ''fesseln''. I just wrote kite balloon from my memory of reading about World War I balloons and noticing the distinctive wind catcher empennage in the photograph. Captain [[Ernst A. Lehmann]] mentions \"kite balloon\" in his book ''The Zeppelins'' [http:\/\/www.hydrogencommerce.com\/zepplins\/zeppelin4.htm here]. The source of the term kite, and the different types of observation balloon, is explained quite well [http:\/\/www.westernfrontassociation.com\/great-war-on-land\/73-weapons-equipment-uniforms\/313-ob-bal-west.html here] under ''Kite balloons and Drachens''. This [http:\/\/www.firstworldwar.com\/diaries\/inakiteballoon.htm story] also mentions them. - +++$+++ :Well, ''Fesselballon'' translates to "tethered balloon", from the German verb ''fesseln''. I just wrote kite balloon from my memory of reading about World War I balloons and noticing the distinctive wind catcher empennage in the photograph. Captain [[Ernst A. Lehmann]] mentions "kite balloon" in his book ''The Zeppelins'' [http://www.hydrogencommerce.com/zepplins/zeppelin4.htm here]. The source of the term kite, and the different types of observation balloon, is explained quite well [http://www.westernfrontassociation.com/great-war-on-land/73-weapons-equipment-uniforms/313-ob-bal-west.html here] under ''Kite balloons and Drachens''. This [http://www.firstworldwar.com/diaries/inakiteballoon.htm story] also mentions them. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 09:50, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

284049 +++$+++ Luka666 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284049 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-24 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.245909180E09 +++$+++ Why not? Does it bother you? I only did those links, because i saw the same thing was done on another GP site (can`t remember which right now). If you dont like it, remove it ;)   +++$+++ Why not? Does it bother you? I only did those links, because i saw the same thing was done on another GP site (can`t remember which right now). If you dont like it, remove it ;)  [[User:Luka666|Luka666]] ([[User talk:Luka666|talk]]) 22:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
284050 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284049 +++$+++ 284049 +++$+++ 2009-06-25 02:18:00 +++$+++ 1.245921480E09 +++$+++ I will, because I did previously because of massively unnecessary [[WP:OVERLINKING]] (of which it might be worth a quick look). -- +++$+++ :I will, because I did previously because of massively unnecessary [[WP:OVERLINKING]] (of which it might be worth a quick look). --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 02:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

21906 +++$+++ Maximilian Schönherr +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21906 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-19 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.303267080E09 +++$+++ what do you think was the purpose of this Fesselballon? if it wasn't military, what was the point in shooting it down?  +++$+++ what do you think was the purpose of this Fesselballon? if it wasn't military, what was the point in shooting it down? [[User:Maximilian Schönherr|Maximilian Schönherr]] ([[User talk:Maximilian Schönherr|talk]]) 19:38, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
21907 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21906 +++$+++ 21906 +++$+++ 2011-04-19 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.303273860E09 +++$+++ Oh, I am pretty sure this was military (it seems unlikely that this was a demonstration but it did cross my mind). The German text states one German pilot photographed another German pilot attacking the \"enemy\" balloon. My reading of the subject indicates that fighter pilots were often instructed to shoot down enemy observation balloons, and many were shot down. I would guess this particular balloon was tasked with observing enemy movements across the front line, maybe troop movements, maybe spotting and calculating enemy artillery locations, and even informing their own artillery how accurate their shots were. Commanders would obviously want to remove the \"eyes\" of their enemy, so to speak. - +++$+++ :Oh, I am pretty sure this was military (it seems unlikely that this was a demonstration but it did cross my mind). The German text states one German pilot photographed another German pilot attacking the "enemy" balloon. My reading of the subject indicates that fighter pilots were often instructed to shoot down enemy observation balloons, and many were shot down. I would guess this particular balloon was tasked with observing enemy movements across the front line, maybe troop movements, maybe spotting and calculating enemy artillery locations, and even informing their own artillery how accurate their shots were. Commanders would obviously want to remove the "eyes" of their enemy, so to speak. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 21:31, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
21908 +++$+++ Alansplodge +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21906 +++$+++ 21907 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.305260940E09 +++$+++ If you don't mind me butting in - I'm pretty certain that reporting the fall of shot (ie \"artillery spotting\") was the main role of observation balloons in WWI. I'll look for a reference. I also remember reading that the balloon ground crews would start frantically winching them down as soon as they heard an aircraft approaching from the wrong direction!  +++$+++ ::If you don't mind me butting in - I'm pretty certain that reporting the fall of shot (ie "artillery spotting") was the main role of observation balloons in WWI. I'll look for a reference. I also remember reading that the balloon ground crews would start frantically winching them down as soon as they heard an aircraft approaching from the wrong direction! [[User:Alansplodge|Alansplodge]] ([[User talk:Alansplodge|talk]]) 21:29, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

284052 +++$+++ Officially Mr X +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284052 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-02 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.249272060E09 +++$+++ I have a feeling your actions on the tables issue is starting to become more of a personal battle against my edits. Please explain properly why you have done this, what benefits it brings and please don't just direct me to another Wiki page on \"why the blind can't read\". Thank you.  +++$+++ I have a feeling your actions on the tables issue is starting to become more of a personal battle against my edits. Please explain properly why you have done this, what benefits it brings and please don't just direct me to another Wiki page on "why the blind can't read". Thank you. [[User:Officially Mr X|Officially Mr X]] ([[User talk:Officially Mr X|talk]]) 21:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
284053 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284052 +++$+++ 284052 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.249272600E09 +++$+++ I believe you're feeling to be wrong. I don't believe someone saying edits that happen to be yours are bad, is personal. It's entirely possible that they are just bad. Don't diss people just because they disagree with you, they may have valid points. Try to learn something from the collective wisdom assembled within WP:MS and from the greater Wikipedia experience. -- +++$+++ :I believe you're feeling to be wrong. I don't believe someone saying edits that happen to be yours are bad, is personal. It's entirely possible that they are just bad. Don't diss people just because they disagree with you, they may have valid points. Try to learn something from the collective wisdom assembled within WP:MS and from the greater Wikipedia experience. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 21:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
284054 +++$+++ Officially Mr X +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284052 +++$+++ 284053 +++$+++ 2009-08-02 22:03:00 +++$+++ 1.249275780E09 +++$+++ You still didn't answer my question (incase you didn't notice I want your wisdom but not your unhelpful criticism).  +++$+++ ::You still didn't answer my question (incase you didn't notice I want your wisdom but not your unhelpful criticism). [[User:Officially Mr X|Officially Mr X]] ([[User talk:Officially Mr X|talk]]) 22:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
284055 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284052 +++$+++ 284054 +++$+++ 2009-08-03 02:37:00 +++$+++ 1.249292220E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 02:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

21909 +++$+++ Maximilian Schönherr +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21909 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-30 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.304201820E09 +++$+++ i stumbled across a photo from 1902 or earlier which depicts \"Luftschiffer [[Stanley Spencer]] mit Familie\" and \"Stanley Spencer im Fluge\". he obviously was an important figure in the beginnings of the age of airships. why can't i find him here in the english wikipedia? any idea? there's only an article about the painter with the same name.  +++$+++ i stumbled across a photo from 1902 or earlier which depicts "Luftschiffer [[Stanley Spencer]] mit Familie" and "Stanley Spencer im Fluge". he obviously was an important figure in the beginnings of the age of airships. why can't i find him here in the english wikipedia? any idea? there's only an article about the painter with the same name. [[User:Maximilian Schönherr|Maximilian Schönherr]] ([[User talk:Maximilian Schönherr|talk]]) 15:17, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
21910 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21909 +++$+++ 21909 +++$+++ 2011-04-30 21:14:00 +++$+++ 1.304223240E09 +++$+++ The reason he's not mentioned in the English wikipedia must be because until now no one has bothered to add the information. Google found two old paper sources:  [http:\/\/paperspast.natlib.govt.nz\/cgi-bin\/paperspast?a=d&d=TS19031231.2.12&l=mi&e=-------10--1----2-- Star , Putanga 7898, 31 Hakihea 1903, Page 2] summarising a court case between Spencer and Mellin's Food (which describes him as \"the well-known aeronaut\") and [http:\/\/query.nytimes.com\/gst\/abstract.html?res=F00F10FF355414728DDDA90A94D1405B828CF1D3 AN AIRSHIP TRAVELS NEARLY THIRTY MILES] from the New York Times 1902 September 20. Maybe you could start [[Stanley Spencer (aeronaut)]] as a stub? -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 18:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)  I have just added a small bit about him at [[Airship#Early pioneers]] with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Airship&action=historysubmit&diff=426784023&oldid=426769768 these edits]. Thanks for bringing this character to my attention. Is the photograph you found available online? - +++$+++ :The reason he's not mentioned in the English wikipedia must be because until now no one has bothered to add the information. Google found two old paper sources:  [http://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&d=TS19031231.2.12&l=mi&e=-------10--1----2-- Star , Putanga 7898, 31 Hakihea 1903, Page 2] summarising a court case between Spencer and Mellin's Food (which describes him as "the well-known aeronaut") and [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00F10FF355414728DDDA90A94D1405B828CF1D3 AN AIRSHIP TRAVELS NEARLY THIRTY MILES] from the New York Times 1902 September 20. Maybe you could start [[Stanley Spencer (aeronaut)]] as a stub? -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 18:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)  I have just added a small bit about him at [[Airship#Early pioneers]] with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Airship&action=historysubmit&diff=426784023&oldid=426769768 these edits]. Thanks for bringing this character to my attention. Is the photograph you found available online? -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 21:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

546198 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546198 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-20 00:33:00 +++$+++ 1.258705980E09 +++$+++ Hey Tim. How do you feel about semi-protecting the article? I see nothing but vandalism and questionable additions in the recent history. Best as always,  +++$+++ Hey Tim. How do you feel about semi-protecting the article? I see nothing but vandalism and questionable additions in the recent history. Best as always, [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 00:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
546199 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546198 +++$+++ 546198 +++$+++ 2009-11-23 19:33:00 +++$+++ 1.259033580E09 +++$+++ Any thoughts on this? :)  +++$+++ :Any thoughts on this? :) [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 19:33, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
546200 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546198 +++$+++ 546199 +++$+++ 2009-11-23 19:38:00 +++$+++ 1.259033880E09 +++$+++ Sure, go ahead.  +++$+++ ::Sure, go ahead. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 19:38, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

284056 +++$+++ Chr.K. +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284056 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-03 20:51:00 +++$+++ 1.249357860E09 +++$+++ We're having a discussion about that right now on the AOWR discussion page. Namely, at what points to put in \"Rpl\" or \"DNP\". Others have commented, and I tend to now agree with, the notion that \"Rpl\" should mean that the driver qualified the car, but someone else raced it...since the amount of times that one could write that given drivers were replaced by one team, but then went to another, makes the choice of whether to put \"Rpl\" for that reason almost arbitrary, eventually. Since Helio was unable to even show up, ''but was still on contract with Team Penske'', I am saying DNP should be present instead. -- +++$+++ We're having a discussion about that right now on the AOWR discussion page. Namely, at what points to put in "Rpl" or "DNP". Others have commented, and I tend to now agree with, the notion that "Rpl" should mean that the driver qualified the car, but someone else raced it...since the amount of times that one could write that given drivers were replaced by one team, but then went to another, makes the choice of whether to put "Rpl" for that reason almost arbitrary, eventually. Since Helio was unable to even show up, ''but was still on contract with Team Penske'', I am saying DNP should be present instead. --[[User:Chr.K.|Chr.K.]] ([[User talk:Chr.K.|talk]]) 20:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
284057 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284056 +++$+++ 284056 +++$+++ 2009-08-03 21:10:00 +++$+++ 1.249359000E09 +++$+++ There are many terms, leading of which Rpl and Inj which are just unneccesary variations of DNS or blank. If we are going to detail the reasons there and for Castroneves, then why not detail the retirements? Acc, Eng, Gbx, Fue, Fir etc. Its a double standard. -- +++$+++ :There are many terms, leading of which Rpl and Inj which are just unneccesary variations of DNS or blank. If we are going to detail the reasons there and for Castroneves, then why not detail the retirements? Acc, Eng, Gbx, Fue, Fir etc. Its a double standard. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 21:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

546201 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-28 01:27:00 +++$+++ 1.259400420E09 +++$+++ Every time I think about that conspiracy theory sentence, I burst out laughing. I've been reading a lot about 7\/7 conspiracy theories for another article I'm working on, so the idea that there's a vaccine going around squirting this stuff into people &mdash; well, it would explain so much! :-D <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ Every time I think about that conspiracy theory sentence, I burst out laughing. I've been reading a lot about 7/7 conspiracy theories for another article I'm working on, so the idea that there's a vaccine going around squirting this stuff into people &mdash; well, it would explain so much! :-D <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> 01:27, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
546202 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546201 +++$+++ 546201 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 01:37:00 +++$+++ 1.259401020E09 +++$+++ I have found myself wondering whether the [[Illuminati]] are behind [[Climategate]]. And I recently got the H1N1 vaccine. Coincidence? And I got the bland vaccine - imagine if I'd gotten adjuvant! ''' +++$+++ :I have found myself wondering whether the [[Illuminati]] are behind [[Climategate]]. And I recently got the H1N1 vaccine. Coincidence? And I got the bland vaccine - imagine if I'd gotten adjuvant! '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 01:37, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
546203 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546201 +++$+++ 546202 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 01:51:00 +++$+++ 1.259401860E09 +++$+++ If you still believe there's such a thing as a cooincidence, you may need another dose. :) <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ ::If you still believe there's such a thing as a cooincidence, you may need another dose. :) <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> 01:51, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
546204 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546201 +++$+++ 546203 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.259402100E09 +++$+++ Discerning ''New Yorker'' readers would balk at the lack of a diaeresis in \"cooincidence\", SV.  +++$+++ :::Discerning ''New Yorker'' readers would balk at the lack of a diaeresis in "cooincidence", SV. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 01:55, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
546205 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546201 +++$+++ 546204 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.259403000E09 +++$+++ It's one of those spelling mistakes I always make. Another one is \"infoxbox\". I have to think hard before I can write \"infobox,\" and it's a ''real'' struggle to batter down that extra \"x\". <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ ::::It's one of those spelling mistakes I always make. Another one is "infoxbox". I have to think hard before I can write "infobox," and it's a ''real'' struggle to batter down that extra "x". <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> 02:10, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
546206 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546201 +++$+++ 546205 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 05:07:00 +++$+++ 1.259413620E09 +++$+++ Discerning ''New Yorker'' readers long ago concluded that their diaeresis fetish was a pretentious middlebrow affectation. :P ''' +++$+++ :::::Discerning ''New Yorker'' readers long ago concluded that their diaeresis fetish was a pretentious middlebrow affectation. :P '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 05:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
546207 +++$+++ Fvasconcellos +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546201 +++$+++ 546206 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.259440500E09 +++$+++ Pshaw! Leave me my middlebrow affectation, sir. Do you have any idea what a [[Reforms of Portuguese orthography|sweeping spelling reform]] does to a translator? I'm going through major diacritic withdrawal here.  +++$+++ ::::::Pshaw! Leave me my middlebrow affectation, sir. Do you have any idea what a [[Reforms of Portuguese orthography|sweeping spelling reform]] does to a translator? I'm going through major diacritic withdrawal here. [[User:Fvasconcellos|Fvasconcellos]]<small>&nbsp;([[User talk:Fvasconcellos|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Fvasconcellos|c]])</small> 12:35, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
546208 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546201 +++$+++ 546207 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 21:52:00 +++$+++ 1.259473920E09 +++$+++ I was once taught that when the Bolsheviks reformed Russian orthography, such that the [[hard sign]] could be omitted from the ends of words, that ''[[War and Peace]]'' became shorter by about 40 pages. I cannot find a source for this, though, so it may be apocryphal. ''' +++$+++ :::::::I was once taught that when the Bolsheviks reformed Russian orthography, such that the [[hard sign]] could be omitted from the ends of words, that ''[[War and Peace]]'' became shorter by about 40 pages. I cannot find a source for this, though, so it may be apocryphal. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 21:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
546209 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546201 +++$+++ 546203 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 02:16:00 +++$+++ 1.259403360E09 +++$+++ Conspiracy theories may be an infectious disease, but, alas, we have no vaccine.  +++$+++ :::Conspiracy theories may be an infectious disease, but, alas, we have no vaccine. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 02:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
546210 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546201 +++$+++ 546209 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.259413740E09 +++$+++ If I [[AIDS denialism|understand HIV\/AIDS correctly]], then the fact that we lack a vaccine proves that the disease does not exist. ''' +++$+++ ::::If I [[AIDS denialism|understand HIV/AIDS correctly]], then the fact that we lack a vaccine proves that the disease does not exist. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 05:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

21914 +++$+++ Maximilian Schönherr +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21914 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-02 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.304367480E09 +++$+++ i've created the inter-wiki-link from your new article to mine in the german wiki.  +++$+++ i've created the inter-wiki-link from your new article to mine in the german wiki. [[User:Maximilian Schönherr|Maximilian Schönherr]] ([[User talk:Maximilian Schönherr|talk]]) 13:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
21915 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21914 +++$+++ 21914 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.305223320E09 +++$+++ I did some limited Googling but could not find much to answer your questions. I posted a question linking here at the [[Wikipedia:Reference_desk\/Humanities#Stanley Spencer balloonist and parachutist|Humanities Reference_desk]] linking to here. - +++$+++ :I did some limited Googling but could not find much to answer your questions. I posted a question linking here at the [[Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities#Stanley Spencer balloonist and parachutist|Humanities Reference_desk]] linking to here. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 11:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

284059 +++$+++ NaBUru38 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284059 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-18 17:43:00 +++$+++ 1.250642580E09 +++$+++ I wanted to ask you another unrelated question: are V8 Supercars [[silhouette racing car]]s or production-based race cars? I want to make that clear in articles both in the English-language and Spanish-language Wikipedias, and I believe you are a good source for this. I expect you answer here. See you later! -- +++$+++ I wanted to ask you another unrelated question: are V8 Supercars [[silhouette racing car]]s or production-based race cars? I want to make that clear in articles both in the English-language and Spanish-language Wikipedias, and I believe you are a good source for this. I expect you answer here. See you later! --[[User:NaBUru38|NaBUru38]] ([[User talk:NaBUru38|talk]]) 17:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
284060 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284059 +++$+++ 284059 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.250663820E09 +++$+++ While those within V8 supercar, and a large portion of fans, will tell you they are production based, but its fantasy. While some sheet metal remains the same the mechanicals do not. Silouhette definately. -- +++$+++ :While those within V8 supercar, and a large portion of fans, will tell you they are production based, but its fantasy. While some sheet metal remains the same the mechanicals do not. Silouhette definately. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 23:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
284061 +++$+++ NaBUru38 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284059 +++$+++ 284060 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.250843520E09 +++$+++ In Spanish, purpose-built paved motorsport circuits are called \"aut\xf3dromos\" - that's the same in other languages. (see [[Aut\xf3dromo Hermanos Rodr\xedguez]], [[Aut\xf3dromo Internacional Nelson Piquet]], [[Autodrom Most]], [[Autodrome de Linas-Montlh\xe9ry]], [[Aut\xf3dromo do Estoril]], [[Autodromo Nazionale Monza]]). Not only that word doesn't exist in English, but there's no article in Wikipedia about those circuits ([[Race track]] is a messup). But keep in mind that paved ovals are purpose built as well. See you! -- +++$+++ ::In Spanish, purpose-built paved motorsport circuits are called "autódromos" - that's the same in other languages. (see [[Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez]], [[Autódromo Internacional Nelson Piquet]], [[Autodrom Most]], [[Autodrome de Linas-Montlhéry]], [[Autódromo do Estoril]], [[Autodromo Nazionale Monza]]). Not only that word doesn't exist in English, but there's no article in Wikipedia about those circuits ([[Race track]] is a messup). But keep in mind that paved ovals are purpose built as well. See you! --[[User:NaBUru38|NaBUru38]] ([[User talk:NaBUru38|talk]]) 01:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
284062 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284059 +++$+++ 284061 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.250844360E09 +++$+++ I don't think it should be reverted, because what you changed it to is not correct. What is there presently is not completely correct either as you have pointed out, but I reverted because what you'd written was wrong, not because what had been there was right, it was in essense and invitation for you to research it a little better and get it right. -- +++$+++ :::I don't think it should be reverted, because what you changed it to is not correct. What is there presently is not completely correct either as you have pointed out, but I reverted because what you'd written was wrong, not because what had been there was right, it was in essense and invitation for you to research it a little better and get it right. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 01:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

21916 +++$+++ Maximilian Schönherr +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21916 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-04 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.304530440E09 +++$+++ off-topic (and i'll delete [http:\/\/dl.dropbox.com\/u\/24398699\/lloyd%27s%20table%20kettle%20from%201800.doc it] once you have it): i found a really sweet ad from may 1800 in the TIMES about a casual water kettle. maybe you want to feed it into [[kettle]] or something like that.  +++$+++ off-topic (and i'll delete [http://dl.dropbox.com/u/24398699/lloyd%27s%20table%20kettle%20from%201800.doc it] once you have it): i found a really sweet ad from may 1800 in the TIMES about a casual water kettle. maybe you want to feed it into [[kettle]] or something like that. [[User:Maximilian Schönherr|Maximilian Schönherr]] ([[User talk:Maximilian Schönherr|talk]]) 10:34, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
21917 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21916 +++$+++ 21916 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.305223320E09 +++$+++ I have downloaded that image and then added a note to [[Talk:Kettle#Lloyd's Patent Table Kettle]]. Can you tell me more details about where the image comes from, such as the page number of the Times newspaper? The image shows \"page 2 of 4 in this edition\", which seems rather short for a newspaper. Was it from a classified section? Googling finds a few \"Table Kettle\"s but nothing from 1800. You can answer on the Kettle Talk page so others might see it, because I now look at wikipedia once a week or so. - +++$+++ :I have downloaded that image and then added a note to [[Talk:Kettle#Lloyd's Patent Table Kettle]]. Can you tell me more details about where the image comes from, such as the page number of the Times newspaper? The image shows "page 2 of 4 in this edition", which seems rather short for a newspaper. Was it from a classified section? Googling finds a few "Table Kettle"s but nothing from 1800. You can answer on the Kettle Talk page so others might see it, because I now look at wikipedia once a week or so. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 11:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

21918 +++$+++ JamesBWatson +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21918 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-18 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.303160220E09 +++$+++ {{Talkback|JamesBWatson|Infiniminer?}}  +++$+++ {{Talkback|JamesBWatson|Infiniminer?}} [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson|talk]]) 13:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
21919 +++$+++ JamesBWatson +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21918 +++$+++ 21918 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.303161720E09 +++$+++ ...and again.  +++$+++ :...and again. [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson|talk]]) 14:22, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

284063 +++$+++ NaBUru38 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284063 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-22 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.269318060E09 +++$+++ (Reply to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:NaBUru38&diff=351143587&oldid=348434772 this]) I don't understand your question. I haven't read that article in weeks, working on stuff like [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Category:2010_Punta_del_Este_Grand_Prix this] instead. -- +++$+++ (Reply to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NaBUru38&diff=351143587&oldid=348434772 this]) I don't understand your question. I haven't read that article in weeks, working on stuff like [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:2010_Punta_del_Este_Grand_Prix this] instead. --[[User:NaBUru38|NaBUru38]] ([[User talk:NaBUru38|talk]]) 21:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
284064 +++$+++ NaBUru38 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284063 +++$+++ 284063 +++$+++ 2010-03-23 00:24:00 +++$+++ 1.269329040E09 +++$+++ A hunch? Wild guessing? Me bad. See you later! -- +++$+++ :A hunch? Wild guessing? Me bad. See you later! --[[User:NaBUru38|NaBUru38]] ([[User talk:NaBUru38|talk]]) 00:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
284065 +++$+++ NaBUru38 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284063 +++$+++ 284064 +++$+++ 2010-04-03 02:41:00 +++$+++ 1.270287660E09 +++$+++ I'd say the latter. Start anytime you want. :) By the way, I disagree with some of my old edits. Bye! -- +++$+++ ::I'd say the latter. Start anytime you want. :) By the way, I disagree with some of my old edits. Bye! --[[User:NaBUru38|NaBUru38]] ([[User talk:NaBUru38|talk]]) 02:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

21921 +++$+++  +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-10 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.305080040E09 +++$+++ ... which you might want to feed into the relevant pages. see  +++$+++ ... which you might want to feed into the relevant pages. see [[User:Maximilian Schönherr/gallery]] in the wikipedia commons. M@ximili@n 19:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
21922 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21921 +++$+++ 21921 +++$+++ 2011-05-12 21:16:00 +++$+++ 1.305260160E09 +++$+++ From a wikipedia page the link should be [[Commons:User:Maximilian Sch\xf6nherr\/gallery]]. I have added relevant categories to the Commons file pages. - +++$+++ :From a wikipedia page the link should be [[Commons:User:Maximilian Schönherr/gallery]]. I have added relevant categories to the Commons file pages. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 21:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

284066 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284066 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-24 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.251097380E09 +++$+++ Links\/examples please?  +++$+++ Links/examples please? [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 00:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
284067 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284066 +++$+++ 284066 +++$+++ 2009-08-24 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.251097500E09 +++$+++ [[:Category:1997 in V8 Supercars]] -- +++$+++ :[[:Category:1997 in V8 Supercars]] --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 00:05, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
284068 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284066 +++$+++ 284066 +++$+++ 2009-08-24 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.251098040E09 +++$+++ [[:Category:1992 in motorsport]] -- +++$+++ :[[:Category:1992 in motorsport]] --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 00:14, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
284069 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284066 +++$+++ 284066 +++$+++ 2009-08-24 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.251100380E09 +++$+++ Imagine the mess if you default sorted [[:Category:1988 in Australia|this]] category? You'd have a mix of what had been sorted by year or name... -- +++$+++ :Imagine the mess if you default sorted [[:Category:1988 in Australia|this]] category? You'd have a mix of what had been sorted by year or name... --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 00:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
284070 +++$+++ Skier Dude +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284066 +++$+++ 284069 +++$+++ 2009-08-24 02:46:00 +++$+++ 1.251107160E09 +++$+++ I'll leave a note with the AWB folks, as this is a \"default\" feature now - looks like they have to add in an exception.  +++$+++ ::I'll leave a note with the AWB folks, as this is a "default" feature now - looks like they have to add in an exception. [[User:Skier Dude|<span style="color:ForestGreen">Skier Dude</span>]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|<span style="color:SaddleBrown">talk</span>]]) 02:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

21923 +++$+++ Sadads +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21923 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-30 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.306788420E09 +++$+++ Hi 84user, just wanted to let you know that I have [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A{{PAGENAMEU}} added] the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles.  This feature should have little to no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on [[WP:NPP|new page patrollers]].  For more information on the patroller right, see [[Wikipedia:Autopatrolled]].  Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions.  Happy editing!  +++$+++ Hi 84user, just wanted to let you know that I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A{{PAGENAMEU}} added] the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles.  This feature should have little to no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on [[WP:NPP|new page patrollers]].  For more information on the patroller right, see [[Wikipedia:Autopatrolled]].  Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions.  Happy editing! [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 13:47, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
21924 +++$+++ Sadads +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21923 +++$+++ 21923 +++$+++ 2011-05-30 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.306788420E09 +++$+++ Hey, since you are obviously one of our more valuable content contributer, I would like to invite you to join us at [[WP:NPP|New Page Patrol]] and help us get rid of the massive backlog of unpatrolled pages we have at [[Special:NewPages]]. If you are to busy doing other stuff totally understandable, and remember to keep up the great content creation, Happy editing!  +++$+++ :Hey, since you are obviously one of our more valuable content contributer, I would like to invite you to join us at [[WP:NPP|New Page Patrol]] and help us get rid of the massive backlog of unpatrolled pages we have at [[Special:NewPages]]. If you are to busy doing other stuff totally understandable, and remember to keep up the great content creation, Happy editing! [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 13:47, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

21926 +++$+++ Lionelt +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21926 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-19 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.308551760E09 +++$+++ Hi 84, I was wondering... What ever happened to [[:Category:Films that are public domain in the United States]]? I was going to add ''Life With Father''.  +++$+++ Hi 84, I was wondering... What ever happened to [[:Category:Films that are public domain in the United States]]? I was going to add ''Life With Father''. [[User:Lionelt|Lionel]] ([[User talk:Lionelt|talk]]) 23:36, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
21927 +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 84user +++$+++ 21926 +++$+++ 21926 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 01:55:00 +++$+++ 1.308646500E09 +++$+++ The cat became a list: [[List of films in the public domain in the United States]]. - +++$+++ :The cat became a list: [[List of films in the public domain in the United States]]. -[[User:84user|84user]] ([[User talk:84user#top|talk]]) 01:55, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

21928 +++$+++ Flockmeal +++$+++ Kitch +++$+++ 21928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2004-12-11 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.102758120E09 +++$+++ I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Please [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Where to ask a question]], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{&#123;helpme}}<\/code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!&nbsp; -- +++$+++ I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Please [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Where to ask a question]], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{&#123;helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!&nbsp; --[[User:Flockmeal|Flockmeal]] 01:42, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
21929 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Kitch +++$+++ 21928 +++$+++ 21928 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.296096840E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

546217 +++$+++ The Sceptical Chymist +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546217 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-28 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.259448120E09 +++$+++ Never mind, Casliber took care of that.  +++$+++ Never mind, Casliber took care of that. [[User:The Sceptical Chymist|The Sceptical Chymist]] ([[User talk:The Sceptical Chymist|talk]]) 14:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
546218 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546217 +++$+++ 546217 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 18:07:00 +++$+++ 1.259460420E09 +++$+++ Thanks Casliber.  +++$+++ :Thanks Casliber. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 18:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
546219 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546217 +++$+++ 546218 +++$+++ 2009-11-28 19:56:00 +++$+++ 1.259466960E09 +++$+++ No problem - I have been semi'ing some where there is a delay in reversion of vandalism. ;)  +++$+++ ::No problem - I have been semi'ing some where there is a delay in reversion of vandalism. ;) [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 19:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
546220 +++$+++ Snowmanradio +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546217 +++$+++ 546219 +++$+++ 2009-11-29 21:20:00 +++$+++ 1.259558400E09 +++$+++ See update [[Talk:Escitalopram#Side_effects_profile_-_favourable_to_citalopram]].  +++$+++ :::See update [[Talk:Escitalopram#Side_effects_profile_-_favourable_to_citalopram]]. [[User:Snowmanradio|Snowman]] ([[User talk:Snowmanradio|talk]]) 21:20, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
546221 +++$+++ Snowmanradio +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546217 +++$+++ 546219 +++$+++ 2009-11-29 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.259559180E09 +++$+++ May I say that I feel that this semi-protecting to the paroxetine article is rather harsh. I am aware of users making good faith edits to the page, and many are logged in and have talk pages, where issues may be raised with them. If you feel that there is enough evidence for sock puppets, then please ask for this to be investigated. I feel that there is a difference of opinion between editors of the page sometimes about how to present the information, which may be sorted out through discussion. I will be grateful if you would review the current semi-protection that you instigated.  +++$+++ :::May I say that I feel that this semi-protecting to the paroxetine article is rather harsh. I am aware of users making good faith edits to the page, and many are logged in and have talk pages, where issues may be raised with them. If you feel that there is enough evidence for sock puppets, then please ask for this to be investigated. I feel that there is a difference of opinion between editors of the page sometimes about how to present the information, which may be sorted out through discussion. I will be grateful if you would review the current semi-protection that you instigated. [[User:Snowmanradio|Snowman]] ([[User talk:Snowmanradio|talk]]) 21:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
546222 +++$+++ Casliber +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546217 +++$+++ 546221 +++$+++ 2009-11-30 01:29:00 +++$+++ 1.259573340E09 +++$+++ Point taken. I noted that there was a significant delay in dealign with reversions by IPs to escitalopram, however I was hasty in not checking what was reverted. That said, given that (a) the material has been subsequently crafted, and (b) there are more of us looking at escitalopram now, I have unprotected. The drug has some intriguing leads to follow up and might be a good one to bring up to Good or Featured standard to illustrate how best to balance newspapers and medical sources for popular perception and other issues. I have no comment on the current state of [[paroxetine]] yet as I have not looked at it in some time, I do recall there being some problems with stability.  +++$+++ ::::Point taken. I noted that there was a significant delay in dealign with reversions by IPs to escitalopram, however I was hasty in not checking what was reverted. That said, given that (a) the material has been subsequently crafted, and (b) there are more of us looking at escitalopram now, I have unprotected. The drug has some intriguing leads to follow up and might be a good one to bring up to Good or Featured standard to illustrate how best to balance newspapers and medical sources for popular perception and other issues. I have no comment on the current state of [[paroxetine]] yet as I have not looked at it in some time, I do recall there being some problems with stability. [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 01:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

21930 +++$+++ Trödel +++$+++ Kitch +++$+++ 21930 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-19 16:11:00 +++$+++ 1.303254660E09 +++$+++ Just wondering where you got the attendance number from (link), I was trying to find that. --<font color=\"#06C\"> +++$+++ Just wondering where you got the attendance number from (link), I was trying to find that. --<font color="#06C">[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]]</font> 16:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
21931 +++$+++ Kitch +++$+++ Kitch +++$+++ 21930 +++$+++ 21930 +++$+++ 2011-04-19 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.303263720E09 +++$+++ USL keeps statistics. The number is the announced attendance at the match. -- +++$+++ * USL keeps statistics. The number is the announced attendance at the match. --[[User:Kitch|Kitch]] <sup>([[User talk:Kitch|Talk]] : [[Special:Contributions/Kitch|Contrib]])</sup> 18:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
21932 +++$+++ Trödel +++$+++ Kitch +++$+++ 21930 +++$+++ 21931 +++$+++ 2011-04-20 20:02:00 +++$+++ 1.303354920E09 +++$+++ I figured it was on the USL website somewhere - I just didn't easily find it. do you have a link? --<font color=\"#06C\"> +++$+++ ** I figured it was on the USL website somewhere - I just didn't easily find it. do you have a link? --<font color="#06C">[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]]</font> 20:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

284075 +++$+++ Francesco Betti Sorbelli +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284075 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-18 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.253291640E09 +++$+++ Hi, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=2010_Bahrain_Grand_Prix&diff=prev&oldid=314592515 this] is my edit... not [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=2010_Bahrain_Grand_Prix&oldid=310948620 this] :D -- +++$+++ Hi, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2010_Bahrain_Grand_Prix&diff=prev&oldid=314592515 this] is my edit... not [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2010_Bahrain_Grand_Prix&oldid=310948620 this] :D --[[User:Francesco Betti Sorbelli|Francesco Betti Sorbelli]] ([[User talk:Francesco Betti Sorbelli|talk]]) 09:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
284076 +++$+++ Francesco Betti Sorbelli +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284075 +++$+++ 284075 +++$+++ 2009-09-18 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.253293680E09 +++$+++ No problem ''Falca'' :) -- +++$+++ : No problem ''Falca'' :) --[[User:Francesco Betti Sorbelli|Francesco Betti Sorbelli]] ([[User talk:Francesco Betti Sorbelli|talk]]) 10:08, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

611763 +++$+++ Logical2u +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-27 22:36:00 +++$+++ 1.167287760E09 +++$+++ It's not a lot of use. If the user is signing with @AOL, it's likely its from an AOL IP, which is essentially a proxy. The other possibility is that it's just a regular proxy and he's using @AOL to throw off the trail.  +++$+++ It's not a lot of use. If the user is signing with @AOL, it's likely its from an AOL IP, which is essentially a proxy. The other possibility is that it's just a regular proxy and he's using @AOL to throw off the trail. [[User:Logical2u]]<sub>[[User talk:Logical2u|Talk]]</sub> 22:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
611764 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611763 +++$+++ 611763 +++$+++ 2006-12-29 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.167458280E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I guess that would explain how the name got there in the first place :) Again, thanks and happy editing! \/\/  +++$+++ :Thank you. I guess that would explain how the name got there in the first place :) Again, thanks and happy editing! // [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuke'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sasuke-kun27|<font color="purple">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 21:58, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

21934 +++$+++ Trödel +++$+++ Kitch +++$+++ 21934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-20 13:24:00 +++$+++ 1.311193440E09 +++$+++ I noticed you changed [[Orlando City S.C.|Orlando City]] to the collapible football box - I have been thinking about doing that for some time on all the games. If you want to keep moving forward on that - I can assist in the conversion in the evenings. --<font color=\"#06C\"> +++$+++ I noticed you changed [[Orlando City S.C.|Orlando City]] to the collapible football box - I have been thinking about doing that for some time on all the games. If you want to keep moving forward on that - I can assist in the conversion in the evenings. --<font color="#06C">[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]]</font> 13:24, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
21935 +++$+++ Kitch +++$+++ Kitch +++$+++ 21934 +++$+++ 21934 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.311198000E09 +++$+++ I am working on the [[2011 Orlando City S.C. season|regular season]] version offline. If you want to do the preseason, go right ahead. -- +++$+++ * I am working on the [[2011 Orlando City S.C. season|regular season]] version offline. If you want to do the preseason, go right ahead. --[[User:Kitch|Kitch]] <sup>([[User talk:Kitch|Talk]] : [[Special:Contributions/Kitch|Contrib]])</sup> 14:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
21936 +++$+++ Trödel +++$+++ Kitch +++$+++ 21934 +++$+++ 21935 +++$+++ 2011-07-20 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.311218400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for doing that - too late for me to help - I'm at work so I can only do small stuff here and there. --<font color=\"#06C\"> +++$+++ :: Thanks for doing that - too late for me to help - I'm at work so I can only do small stuff here and there. --<font color="#06C">[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]]</font> 20:20, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

284079 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284079 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-06 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.254847980E09 +++$+++ A small critique if you don't mind. A few corner names are not quite correct. Slightly odd to see Quarry in use for Griffin's Bend. It's not wrong, it's just Quarry was the original name and used up until about the 1950s. Similarly Griffin's Mount is a rather old name although it has never had a consistent name since. The Dipper is actually corner 14, refered thus as the track plunges sharply mid corner. Forrests Elbow is corner 18, corner 19 has never really had a name beyond the kink in Conrod Straight. Skyline was renamed Brock's Skyline after Peter Brock's death in 2006. -- +++$+++ A small critique if you don't mind. A few corner names are not quite correct. Slightly odd to see Quarry in use for Griffin's Bend. It's not wrong, it's just Quarry was the original name and used up until about the 1950s. Similarly Griffin's Mount is a rather old name although it has never had a consistent name since. The Dipper is actually corner 14, refered thus as the track plunges sharply mid corner. Forrests Elbow is corner 18, corner 19 has never really had a name beyond the kink in Conrod Straight. Skyline was renamed Brock's Skyline after Peter Brock's death in 2006. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore|talk]]) 09:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
284080 +++$+++ Will Pittenger +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284079 +++$+++ 284079 +++$+++ 2009-10-06 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.254897900E09 +++$+++ Could you leave a note on my [http:\/\/wlps-ge-stuff.ucoz.com\/forum\/6 Requests] forum?  Accounts are free and I prefer suggestions there.  That will also enable you to receive notification when the new version is ready.  +++$+++ :Could you leave a note on my [http://wlps-ge-stuff.ucoz.com/forum/6 Requests] forum?  Accounts are free and I prefer suggestions there.  That will also enable you to receive notification when the new version is ready. [[User:Will Pittenger|Will]] <small>([[User talk:Will Pittenger|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Will Pittenger|contribs]])</small> 23:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

284081 +++$+++ The359 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-08 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.255063140E09 +++$+++ I noticed your warning about Sockpuppetry on KembanganGreen's user page.  I would say that at the moment, he's not violating policy, as per [[WP:SOCK]].  There is no requirement to maintain only one account, and since Fen grip is not editing any articles, this is not yet something that requires investigation. Also, judging from their user pages they appear to be siblings, or at least that's the claim.  +++$+++ I noticed your warning about Sockpuppetry on KembanganGreen's user page.  I would say that at the moment, he's not violating policy, as per [[WP:SOCK]].  There is no requirement to maintain only one account, and since Fen grip is not editing any articles, this is not yet something that requires investigation. Also, judging from their user pages they appear to be siblings, or at least that's the claim. [[User:The359|<font color="#004400"><sup>III</sup>V<sub>IX</sub></font>]] ([[User talk:The359|<font color="#004400">Talk</font>]]) 21:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
284082 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284081 +++$+++ 284081 +++$+++ 2009-10-08 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.255067580E09 +++$+++ I'll take no further action. Should I remove the original complaint? -- +++$+++ :I'll take no further action. Should I remove the original complaint? --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 22:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

21938 +++$+++ Kenchikuben +++$+++ Urashimataro +++$+++ 21938 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-24 20:41:00 +++$+++ 1.306294860E09 +++$+++ Hi Urashimataro. I've recently done some work expanding the article on [[Japanese architecture]] and have submitted it for [[WP:WikiProject Architecture\/Peer review|peer review]]. As you have lots of experience editing Japanese architecture articles I'd really appreciate if you could spare some time to read it through and leave some comments. Thanks.  +++$+++ Hi Urashimataro. I've recently done some work expanding the article on [[Japanese architecture]] and have submitted it for [[WP:WikiProject Architecture/Peer review|peer review]]. As you have lots of experience editing Japanese architecture articles I'd really appreciate if you could spare some time to read it through and leave some comments. Thanks. [[User:Kenchikuben|Kenchikuben]] ([[User talk:Kenchikuben|talk]]) 20:41, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
21939 +++$+++ Urashimataro +++$+++ Urashimataro +++$+++ 21938 +++$+++ 21938 +++$+++ 2011-05-25 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.306325100E09 +++$+++ I am about to take a long business trip, and I will be busy for some days, but I will do more after that. Take care. +++$+++ :I am about to take a long business trip, and I will be busy for some days, but I will do more after that. Take care.[[User:Urashimataro|Frank (Urashima Tarō)]] ([[User talk:Urashimataro#top|talk]]) 05:05, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
21940 +++$+++ Kenchikuben +++$+++ Urashimataro +++$+++ 21938 +++$+++ 21939 +++$+++ 2011-05-25 07:18:00 +++$+++ 1.306333080E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your prompt response and comments. The peer review will be up for a while and other editors have also given me lots to think about! Thanks again.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your prompt response and comments. The peer review will be up for a while and other editors have also given me lots to think about! Thanks again. [[User:Kenchikuben|Kenchikuben]] ([[User talk:Kenchikuben|talk]]) 07:18, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

284083 +++$+++ Thinking of England +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284083 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-08 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.255068960E09 +++$+++ I've never dealt with [[WP:CHILD]] before.  Is the personal information on their user pages an issue? --  +++$+++ I've never dealt with [[WP:CHILD]] before.  Is the personal information on their user pages an issue? -- [[User:Thinking of England|ToE]]<sup>[[User talk:Thinking of England|T]]</sup> 23:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
284084 +++$+++ Thinking of England +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284083 +++$+++ 284083 +++$+++ 2009-10-08 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.255069680E09 +++$+++ Reading further, I see that consensus has never been reached on the subject.  (I have no involvement here beyond the redirects I've nominated for deletion.) --  +++$+++ :Reading further, I see that consensus has never been reached on the subject.  (I have no involvement here beyond the redirects I've nominated for deletion.) -- [[User:Thinking of England|ToE]]<sup>[[User talk:Thinking of England|T]]</sup> 23:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

546228 +++$+++ Cool Nerd +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546228 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-01 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.259738880E09 +++$+++ --The Cool Cat, The  +++$+++ --The Cool Cat, The [[User:Cool Nerd|Cool Nerd]] ([[User talk:Cool Nerd|talk]]) 23:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
546229 +++$+++ WAS 4.250 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546228 +++$+++ 546228 +++$+++ 2009-12-02 09:40:00 +++$+++ 1.259775600E09 +++$+++ [[User:Cool Nerd|Cool Nerd]], my preference is also for more fair use quotes rather than summarising; but the clear consensus at Wikipedia is for minimizing quoting, so go with the flow. Add quotes as much as fair use allows, but if others make a fuss, back off on any quote they minimize or summarize. Let's just all get along. PS, I have also done my fair share .. :)  .  +++$+++ :[[User:Cool Nerd|Cool Nerd]], my preference is also for more fair use quotes rather than summarising; but the clear consensus at Wikipedia is for minimizing quoting, so go with the flow. Add quotes as much as fair use allows, but if others make a fuss, back off on any quote they minimize or summarize. Let's just all get along. PS, I have also done my fair share .. :)  . [[User:WAS 4.250|WAS 4.250]] ([[User talk:WAS 4.250|talk]]) 09:40, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

21942 +++$+++ Tenmei +++$+++ Urashimataro +++$+++ 21942 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-19 17:01:00 +++$+++ 1.311120060E09 +++$+++ Are you familiar with this website? -- [http:\/\/web.me.com\/meyer.eva\/www.yukikurete.de\/index.html  den pers\xf6nlichen Seiten von Dr. Eva-Maria Meyer, Akademische Oberr\xe4tin am Seminar f\xfcr Japanologie der Universit\xe4t T\xfcbingen]?<p>Is it possible that this escaped your notice? -- +++$+++ Are you familiar with this website? -- [http://web.me.com/meyer.eva/www.yukikurete.de/index.html  den persönlichen Seiten von Dr. Eva-Maria Meyer, Akademische Oberrätin am Seminar für Japanologie der Universität Tübingen]?<p>Is it possible that this escaped your notice? --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 17:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
21943 +++$+++ Urashimataro +++$+++ Urashimataro +++$+++ 21942 +++$+++ 21942 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.311143400E09 +++$+++ Hi, Tenmei. Thanks for the link, which indeed refers to a site I didn't know. Took a cursory look, will read it more carefully after work. I am not very active these days, unfortunately. - +++$+++ :Hi, Tenmei. Thanks for the link, which indeed refers to a site I didn't know. Took a cursory look, will read it more carefully after work. I am not very active these days, unfortunately. -[[User:Urashimataro|Frank (Urashima Tarō)]] ([[User talk:Urashimataro#top|talk]]) 23:30, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
21944 +++$+++ Tenmei +++$+++ Urashimataro +++$+++ 21942 +++$+++ 21943 +++$+++ 2011-07-19 23:48:00 +++$+++ 1.311144480E09 +++$+++ This is just something to store away in the back of your mind. -- +++$+++ ::This is just something to store away in the back of your mind. --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 23:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

546232 +++$+++ Riverpa +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546232 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-02 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.259808360E09 +++$+++ I wonder if I could get your input on this POV dispute.   [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view\/Noticeboard#Bioidentical_hormone_replacement_therapy]  +++$+++ I wonder if I could get your input on this POV dispute.   [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Bioidentical_hormone_replacement_therapy] [[User:Riverpa|Riverpa]] ([[User talk:Riverpa|talk]]) 18:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
546233 +++$+++ Riverpa +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546232 +++$+++ 546232 +++$+++ 2009-12-02 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.259812200E09 +++$+++ I got your name from the A4M article which you have done extensive work on recently, being led there by the controversy about it. I consider that article balanced. I cannot say the same about BHRT and would like another opinion about the actual article - at least about the state it was in when the NPOV was posted.  Thanks again.   +++$+++ :I got your name from the A4M article which you have done extensive work on recently, being led there by the controversy about it. I consider that article balanced. I cannot say the same about BHRT and would like another opinion about the actual article - at least about the state it was in when the NPOV was posted.  Thanks again.  [[User:Riverpa|Riverpa]] ([[User talk:Riverpa|talk]]) 19:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
546234 +++$+++  +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546232 +++$+++ 546233 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.260069720E09 +++$+++ I believe Riverpa and myself both agree that the current wording in one part of a table is less than optimal, but can't really think of a better wording.  Could you give some specific input more as a biochemist than an editor?  The discussion is in [[Talk:Bioidentical_hormone_replacement_therapy#Boothby_table|this]] section of the talk page.   +++$+++ ::I believe Riverpa and myself both agree that the current wording in one part of a table is less than optimal, but can't really think of a better wording.  Could you give some specific input more as a biochemist than an editor?  The discussion is in [[Talk:Bioidentical_hormone_replacement_therapy#Boothby_table|this]] section of the talk page.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 19:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

284089 +++$+++ The359 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284089 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-28 07:43:00 +++$+++ 1.256740980E09 +++$+++ I think a watchful eye is needed on Aquadeias here.  +++$+++ I think a watchful eye is needed on Aquadeias here. [[User:The359|<font color="#004400"><sup>III</sup>V<sub>IX</sub></font>]] ([[User talk:The359|<font color="#004400">Talk</font>]]) 07:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
284090 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284089 +++$+++ 284089 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 07:48:00 +++$+++ 1.256741280E09 +++$+++ My thoughts exactly. He was watching your user page and I was debating how to alert you. -- +++$+++ :My thoughts exactly. He was watching your user page and I was debating how to alert you. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 07:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

284091 +++$+++ DH85868993 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284091 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-03 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.257261300E09 +++$+++ Hi Falcadore. I noticed your recent RFD of [[2011 Bahrain Grand Prix]]. You may care to add [[2011 Indian Grand Prix]] into the same RFD (I thought it made sense for them to be in the same RFD rather than for me to start a new one). Hopefully that's the last of them.  +++$+++ Hi Falcadore. I noticed your recent RFD of [[2011 Bahrain Grand Prix]]. You may care to add [[2011 Indian Grand Prix]] into the same RFD (I thought it made sense for them to be in the same RFD rather than for me to start a new one). Hopefully that's the last of them. [[User:DH85868993|DH85868993]] ([[User talk:DH85868993|talk]]) 07:15, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
284092 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284091 +++$+++ 284091 +++$+++ 2009-11-03 12:58:00 +++$+++ 1.257281880E09 +++$+++ Actioned, thank you. -- +++$+++ :Actioned, thank you. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 12:58, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

560560 +++$+++ DanielT5 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ 560560 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.176718680E09 +++$+++ Just noticed this when I looked at the closed AfD this morning. I see you changed your vote to \"endorse deletion\", someone else has come along and says \"endorse closure\" is the right wording.  +++$+++ Just noticed this when I looked at the closed AfD this morning. I see you changed your vote to "endorse deletion", someone else has come along and says "endorse closure" is the right wording. [[User:DanielT5|DanielT5]] 03:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
560561 +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ Orderinchaos +++$+++ 560560 +++$+++ 560560 +++$+++ 2007-04-16 07:12:00 +++$+++ 1.176732720E09 +++$+++ Now addressed. (That's what I get for copying others. :))  +++$+++ : Now addressed. (That's what I get for copying others. :)) [[User:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 07:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

546237 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546237 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-11 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.260584940E09 +++$+++ With regard to the [[anti-aging movement]] article, please be '''very''' careful to stick as closely as possible to the sources. These people seem to be quite willing to sue individual Wikipedia editors if they dislike the statements that are made in the sources cited. As a word of advice, a \"movement\" or a \"profession\" cannot sue, so if you were to say \"energy healers are a bunch of dangerous quacks\", an individual healer cannot sue for defamation, but if you were to say \"energy healing organization X is a bunch of dangerous quacks\", then that organization has standing. I'm not saying I have seen anything incorrect, and all your content seems quite acceptable to me, but this is a dangerous area to deal with.  +++$+++ With regard to the [[anti-aging movement]] article, please be '''very''' careful to stick as closely as possible to the sources. These people seem to be quite willing to sue individual Wikipedia editors if they dislike the statements that are made in the sources cited. As a word of advice, a "movement" or a "profession" cannot sue, so if you were to say "energy healers are a bunch of dangerous quacks", an individual healer cannot sue for defamation, but if you were to say "energy healing organization X is a bunch of dangerous quacks", then that organization has standing. I'm not saying I have seen anything incorrect, and all your content seems quite acceptable to me, but this is a dangerous area to deal with. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 18:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
546238 +++$+++ Fred Bauder +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546237 +++$+++ 546237 +++$+++ 2009-12-11 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.260586260E09 +++$+++ It's much worse than you imagine. They know my name and where I live...  +++$+++ :It's much worse than you imagine. They know my name and where I live... [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 18:51, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
546239 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546237 +++$+++ 546238 +++$+++ 2009-12-11 19:50:00 +++$+++ 1.260589800E09 +++$+++ As with me Fred, and I have personally got a threatening letter from an A4M lawyer objecting to statements that I did not add to the article and were sourced to the NYT. This is why I'm worried.  +++$+++ ::As with me Fred, and I have personally got a threatening letter from an A4M lawyer objecting to statements that I did not add to the article and were sourced to the NYT. This is why I'm worried. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 19:50, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

284094 +++$+++ MotorsportPete93 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284094 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-06 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.257580140E09 +++$+++ As far as I know, the Chevrolet WTCC team was a Chevrolet idea, who got RML to run their programme, beacuse they have a complete lack of experience in such racing. I may be wrong, so I'll bring it up at [[WT:MOTOR]] and see what others think. Thanks -  +++$+++ As far as I know, the Chevrolet WTCC team was a Chevrolet idea, who got RML to run their programme, beacuse they have a complete lack of experience in such racing. I may be wrong, so I'll bring it up at [[WT:MOTOR]] and see what others think. Thanks - [[User:MotorsportPete93|<span style="color:white;background:navy">mspete93</span>]] [[User talk:MotorsportPete93|<span style="color:red;background:white">[talk]</span>]] 23:49, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
284095 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284094 +++$+++ 284094 +++$+++ 2009-11-07 04:17:00 +++$+++ 1.257596220E09 +++$+++ This is the follow of flags. If we are going to have them, they need to be accurate. -- +++$+++ :This is the follow of flags. If we are going to have them, they need to be accurate. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 04:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

284096 +++$+++ Francium12 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284096 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-09 00:12:00 +++$+++ 1.257754320E09 +++$+++ Please read WP:CRYSTAL where it says \"It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur\". The current article is referenced and up to date on quite where we are on the whole 2010 British grand prix debacle. Given the page views the page is getting people are turning to Wikipedia to see the current state of affairs.  +++$+++ Please read WP:CRYSTAL where it says "It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur". The current article is referenced and up to date on quite where we are on the whole 2010 British grand prix debacle. Given the page views the page is getting people are turning to Wikipedia to see the current state of affairs. [[User talk:Francium12|<span style="background:#acf;padding:4px;color:white; 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em">&nbsp;'''Francium12'''&nbsp;</span>]] 00:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
284097 +++$+++ Francium12 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284096 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 03:35:00 +++$+++ 1.257852900E09 +++$+++ Fine, merge. Given the large amount of contribtutions you have made to F1 you clearly have ownership issues over the topic. I'll back off and go and edit something else.  +++$+++ :::Fine, merge. Given the large amount of contribtutions you have made to F1 you clearly have ownership issues over the topic. I'll back off and go and edit something else. [[User talk:Francium12|<span style="background:#acf;padding:4px;color:white; 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em">&nbsp;'''Francium12'''&nbsp;</span>]] 03:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
284098 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284096 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.257854460E09 +++$+++ I'm asking for comment, not a hissy-fit. And why does the fact that the majority of my work is in other motorsport articles or on the periphery of F1, when F1 is already well served by many-many edittors both good and bad have to do with anything, either what I say has validity or not, please do not make this some sort of elitist \"I've got more edits than you do arguement.\" If it does not have any validity say so and why. Save the sulking for someone who may be impressed by it. -- +++$+++ ::::I'm asking for comment, not a hissy-fit. And why does the fact that the majority of my work is in other motorsport articles or on the periphery of F1, when F1 is already well served by many-many edittors both good and bad have to do with anything, either what I say has validity or not, please do not make this some sort of elitist "I've got more edits than you do arguement." If it does not have any validity say so and why. Save the sulking for someone who may be impressed by it. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 04:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

21953 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21953 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-22 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.177295760E09 +++$+++ Feel free to reply on your talk page.  +++$+++ Feel free to reply on your talk page. [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] 19:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
21954 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21953 +++$+++ 21953 +++$+++ 2007-04-23 00:44:00 +++$+++ 1.177314240E09 +++$+++ No - just Miyahira and Iha.  All of the Shorin-ryu practitioners were added by me.  I don't think any others are notable enough for their own article.  Something interesting that I just found is that Iha's first teacher and his major influence, Gusukuma, seems to have been a co-developer of the Shito-ryu stle.  I always assumed that since Gusukuma was a student of Itosu's, that he practiced Shorin-ryu.  Also, it seems that one of Gusukuma's other students (Iju) was Nagazato's (Shorin-ryu Shidokan) first teacher.  -- +++$+++ :No - just Miyahira and Iha.  All of the Shorin-ryu practitioners were added by me.  I don't think any others are notable enough for their own article.  Something interesting that I just found is that Iha's first teacher and his major influence, Gusukuma, seems to have been a co-developer of the Shito-ryu stle.  I always assumed that since Gusukuma was a student of Itosu's, that he practiced Shorin-ryu.  Also, it seems that one of Gusukuma's other students (Iju) was Nagazato's (Shorin-ryu Shidokan) first teacher.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 00:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
21955 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21953 +++$+++ 21954 +++$+++ 2007-04-23 01:35:00 +++$+++ 1.177317300E09 +++$+++ Interesting!  However, I was wondering if there are any other wikipedia users who practice Iha's style.  +++$+++ ::Interesting!  However, I was wondering if there are any other wikipedia users who practice Iha's style. [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] 01:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

546242 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-03 01:15:00 +++$+++ 1.259831700E09 +++$+++ Tim, just a note to thank you for building up this article. You've done a sterling job there <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ Tim, just a note to thank you for building up this article. You've done a sterling job there <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> 01:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
546243 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.259833140E09 +++$+++ I was reading about 7\/7 recently, something I've mostly avoided doing, and I had the same depressing feeling, seeing the things people believe. As requested, I won't go into detail about who believes Icke, though it's comforting to note that one academic's theory is that Icke himself doesn't believe it -- that it may be political satire along the lines of Jonathan Swift. So there's hope. :) <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :I was reading about 7/7 recently, something I've mostly avoided doing, and I had the same depressing feeling, seeing the things people believe. As requested, I won't go into detail about who believes Icke, though it's comforting to note that one academic's theory is that Icke himself doesn't believe it -- that it may be political satire along the lines of Jonathan Swift. So there's hope. :) <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> 01:39, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
546244 +++$+++  +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 546243 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.259834880E09 +++$+++ If he's faking, he puts Andy Kaufman to shame.   +++$+++ ::If he's faking, he puts Andy Kaufman to shame.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 02:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
546245 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 546244 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 04:16:00 +++$+++ 1.259842560E09 +++$+++ That's one of the reasons I keep coming back here. In my real life, most of the people I interact with are sane, highly rational, and good critical thinkers. My participation on Wikipedia has opened my eyes to a whole new world of crazy shit that people actually ''believe'', or at least care deeply enough about to edit-war over. I would never have heard of [[Royal Rife]], or the Anunkani. It would never have occurred to me that a literate, presumably sentient person could believe that HIV doesn't cause AIDS, or that Stalin had nothing to do with the assassination of Leon Trotsky. The anthropological value provided by this site more than justifies the occasional annoyance. :P ''' +++$+++ :::That's one of the reasons I keep coming back here. In my real life, most of the people I interact with are sane, highly rational, and good critical thinkers. My participation on Wikipedia has opened my eyes to a whole new world of crazy shit that people actually ''believe'', or at least care deeply enough about to edit-war over. I would never have heard of [[Royal Rife]], or the Anunkani. It would never have occurred to me that a literate, presumably sentient person could believe that HIV doesn't cause AIDS, or that Stalin had nothing to do with the assassination of Leon Trotsky. The anthropological value provided by this site more than justifies the occasional annoyance. :P '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 04:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
546246 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 546243 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 04:35:00 +++$+++ 1.259843700E09 +++$+++ [[Anunkani]]?  +++$+++ ::[[Anunkani]]? [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 04:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
546247 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 546246 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.259844180E09 +++$+++ ''For further information, see:'' [[Zecharia Sitchin]]. And I misspelt it. :P ''' +++$+++ :::''For further information, see:'' [[Zecharia Sitchin]]. And I misspelt it. :P '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 04:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
546248 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 546247 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.259845800E09 +++$+++ After reading that I am sadly none the wiser, although I am arguably better informed.<ref>[http:\/\/en.wikiquote.org\/wiki\/Talk:F._E._Smith,_1st_Earl_of_Birkenhead source]<\/ref>  +++$+++ ::::After reading that I am sadly none the wiser, although I am arguably better informed.<ref>[http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:F._E._Smith,_1st_Earl_of_Birkenhead source]</ref> [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 05:10, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
546249 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 546248 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.259846100E09 +++$+++ I meant [[Anunnaki]]. Who really existed, but Sitchin used them as the basis for his pseudohistory-slash-alien-origin-theory-slash-nonstandard-cosmology. Ickes drew on Sitchin's work a bit with the lizard people. Great, now you're making ''me'' sound crazy trying to explain it. ''' +++$+++ :::::I meant [[Anunnaki]]. Who really existed, but Sitchin used them as the basis for his pseudohistory-slash-alien-origin-theory-slash-nonstandard-cosmology. Ickes drew on Sitchin's work a bit with the lizard people. Great, now you're making ''me'' sound crazy trying to explain it. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 05:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
546250 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 546249 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 06:17:00 +++$+++ 1.259849820E09 +++$+++ I'm trying to get David Icke to FAC, so you'll soon be able to read all about it. He believes that the swine flu vaccine is an attempt to cull the world's population. Tim, I hope you got that into the article, and didn't fall back on your mainstream science thing. :) <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ ::::::I'm trying to get David Icke to FAC, so you'll soon be able to read all about it. He believes that the swine flu vaccine is an attempt to cull the world's population. Tim, I hope you got that into the article, and didn't fall back on your mainstream science thing. :) <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> 06:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
546251 +++$+++  +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 546250 +++$+++ 2009-12-03 18:24:00 +++$+++ 1.259893440E09 +++$+++ Delicious.  I'd read the crap out of a FA about Icke.  If you're looking for something batshit insane but ''comprehensively'' so, you might try [http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Rule-Secrecy-Trilateral-Commission-Freemasons\/dp\/0060931841 Rule By Secrecy].  Just don't check his sources, they'll make you cry.  I've actually [http:\/\/books.google.ca\/books?id=XuQJAAAACAAJ&sitesec=reviews&rf=ns:1 reviewed] (and read, unfortunately) Children of the Matrix for google books.  It's exactly the opposite of awesome.  We live in a terrible world when von Daniken ends up looking like a purveyor of reasonable speculation.   +++$+++ :::::::Delicious.  I'd read the crap out of a FA about Icke.  If you're looking for something batshit insane but ''comprehensively'' so, you might try [http://www.amazon.com/Rule-Secrecy-Trilateral-Commission-Freemasons/dp/0060931841 Rule By Secrecy].  Just don't check his sources, they'll make you cry.  I've actually [http://books.google.ca/books?id=XuQJAAAACAAJ&sitesec=reviews&rf=ns:1 reviewed] (and read, unfortunately) Children of the Matrix for google books.  It's exactly the opposite of awesome.  We live in a terrible world when von Daniken ends up looking like a purveyor of reasonable speculation.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 18:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
546252 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 546251 +++$+++ 2009-12-04 07:36:00 +++$+++ 1.259940960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the link, WLU. I've been looking for something to explain the Trilateral Commission aspect, and now sadly you've found it for me. :) Your review was only partly right, by the way. Where you wrote, \"Icke assumes that if he can see any relationship between two items, they are related and must be linked to a global conspiracy,\" you missed out the bit about how, when he ''can't'' see any relationship, they're linked anyway, and even more so, because someone's gone to the trouble of making it look as though they're not. :) <font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ ::::::::Thanks for the link, WLU. I've been looking for something to explain the Trilateral Commission aspect, and now sadly you've found it for me. :) Your review was only partly right, by the way. Where you wrote, "Icke assumes that if he can see any relationship between two items, they are related and must be linked to a global conspiracy," you missed out the bit about how, when he ''can't'' see any relationship, they're linked anyway, and even more so, because someone's gone to the trouble of making it look as though they're not. :) <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> 07:36, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
546253 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 546250 +++$+++ 2009-12-05 19:29:00 +++$+++ 1.260070140E09 +++$+++ How [[Talk:2009_flu_pandemic_vaccine#Controversy_section|deeply ironic]].  +++$+++ :::::::How [[Talk:2009_flu_pandemic_vaccine#Controversy_section|deeply ironic]]. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 19:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
546254 +++$+++ AllGloryToTheHypnotoad +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546242 +++$+++ 546249 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 22:09:00 +++$+++ 1.260857340E09 +++$+++ Doesn't Alex Jones also believe that the flu vaccine is meant to cull the population? I seem to remember that assertion while having listened to him one day when my [[PCP]] ran out.  +++$+++ ::::::Doesn't Alex Jones also believe that the flu vaccine is meant to cull the population? I seem to remember that assertion while having listened to him one day when my [[PCP]] ran out. [[User:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad|AllGloryToTheHypnotoad]] ([[User talk:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad|talk]]) 22:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

284100 +++$+++ B-Machine +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284100 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-23 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.259023140E09 +++$+++ At List of 2009 motorsport champions, you didn't add the 2009 NASCAR Sprint Cup and Nationwide champions.  +++$+++ At List of 2009 motorsport champions, you didn't add the 2009 NASCAR Sprint Cup and Nationwide champions. [[User:B-Machine|B-Machine]] ([[User talk:B-Machine|talk]]) 16:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
284101 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284100 +++$+++ 284100 +++$+++ 2009-11-23 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.259046600E09 +++$+++ Why do I have to do it? Can;t you? -- +++$+++ :Why do I have to do it? Can;t you? --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 23:10, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

284102 +++$+++ Aquadeias +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284102 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-24 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.259098080E09 +++$+++ I dont think its too early to create the article. By the way, why didnt you delete the [[2010 Bahrain Grand Prix]] page? Their time difference is only 2 weeks.  +++$+++ I dont think its too early to create the article. By the way, why didnt you delete the [[2010 Bahrain Grand Prix]] page? Their time difference is only 2 weeks. [[User:Aquadeias|Aquadeias]] ([[User talk:Aquadeias|talk]]) 13:28, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
284103 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284102 +++$+++ 284102 +++$+++ 2009-11-25 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.259166960E09 +++$+++ There are times when we just have to exercise patience. Wikipedia is not a news source. There is no race to get information up on the web before everyone else. The most important thing about wikipedia is to be correct the first time information is posted, which is why wikipedia does not post rumours. If you want to write about anything you like, months in advance then I suggest Wikipedia is not for you and there are dozens of chat forums out there you can post that kind of information. -- +++$+++ :There are times when we just have to exercise patience. Wikipedia is not a news source. There is no race to get information up on the web before everyone else. The most important thing about wikipedia is to be correct the first time information is posted, which is why wikipedia does not post rumours. If you want to write about anything you like, months in advance then I suggest Wikipedia is not for you and there are dozens of chat forums out there you can post that kind of information. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 08:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

21960 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-28 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.177747440E09 +++$+++ Should we incorporate this into the category scheme somehow?  +++$+++ Should we incorporate this into the category scheme somehow? [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] 01:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
21961 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21960 +++$+++ 21960 +++$+++ 2007-04-28 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.177750140E09 +++$+++ How would you incorporate it?  Add it to the category pages?  Or do you mean expanding the template to be sorted like the categories?  I think this could be nice - separating karate styles by origin here.  I just changed [[Template:Karate schools]] to use [[Template:Navigation]].  If you want to break it into Okinawan and Japanese, you could use [[Template:Navbox generic]].  Also, maybe this should be renamed to \"Karate systems\" (or at least the title displayed in articles - as per the conventions section of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_Arts]]).  -- +++$+++ :How would you incorporate it?  Add it to the category pages?  Or do you mean expanding the template to be sorted like the categories?  I think this could be nice - separating karate styles by origin here.  I just changed [[Template:Karate schools]] to use [[Template:Navigation]].  If you want to break it into Okinawan and Japanese, you could use [[Template:Navbox generic]].  Also, maybe this should be renamed to "Karate systems" (or at least the title displayed in articles - as per the conventions section of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_Arts]]).  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 01:49, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

284107 +++$+++ WilliamF1two +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-15 16:00:00 +++$+++ 1.260921600E09 +++$+++ Thanks. When I made the edits, I believed that it was based on constructor participation. However, your comment on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorsport]] is very convincing and I agree that we should have clarification on the issue. If you think that it should be based on works team only participation, then maybe the name of the categories should be changed to simply Formula One drivers by team, and we could have a separate category, possibly entitled \"Non-works McLaren Formula One drivers\" etc. Thoughts? Thanks again.  +++$+++ Thanks. When I made the edits, I believed that it was based on constructor participation. However, your comment on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorsport]] is very convincing and I agree that we should have clarification on the issue. If you think that it should be based on works team only participation, then maybe the name of the categories should be changed to simply Formula One drivers by team, and we could have a separate category, possibly entitled "Non-works McLaren Formula One drivers" etc. Thoughts? Thanks again. [[User:WilliamF1two|WilliamF1two]] ([[User talk:WilliamF1two|talk]]) 16:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
284108 +++$+++ WilliamF1two +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 2009-12-18 17:15:00 +++$+++ 1.261185300E09 +++$+++ I'm afraid I disagree. Refer to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorsport]] to see my ideas on your comment. Thanks.  +++$+++ :I'm afraid I disagree. Refer to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorsport]] to see my ideas on your comment. Thanks. [[User:WilliamF1two|WilliamF1two]] ([[User talk:WilliamF1two|talk]]) 17:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
284109 +++$+++ WilliamF1two +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284108 +++$+++ 2009-12-19 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.261250100E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, but this still doesn't hold water. De Cesaris has 13 categories in total, where as David Beckham has 37 categories, more than three times as many.  +++$+++ ::I'm sorry, but this still doesn't hold water. De Cesaris has 13 categories in total, where as David Beckham has 37 categories, more than three times as many. [[User:WilliamF1two|WilliamF1two]] ([[User talk:WilliamF1two|talk]]) 11:15, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
284110 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284109 +++$+++ 2009-12-19 20:18:00 +++$+++ 1.261282680E09 +++$+++ 37 is ridiculous. As is Beckham really. And not really that relevant to the topic. -- +++$+++ :::37 is ridiculous. As is Beckham really. And not really that relevant to the topic. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 20:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
284111 +++$+++ WilliamF1two +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284110 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 10:34:00 +++$+++ 1.261334040E09 +++$+++ Several things are really stupid about this comment. Firstly, a personal attack on David Beckham, who I am fairly sure you've never met, so can't really comment. And, as a fellow sportsman to de Cesaris, I would say that David Beckham is highly relevant, a good comparison between footballers and the sportspeople in question, Formula One drivers. You claim that Formula One drivers comparatively have too many categories, but they have less than a third than that of footballers?! Please, it's simple arithmetic.  +++$+++ ::::Several things are really stupid about this comment. Firstly, a personal attack on David Beckham, who I am fairly sure you've never met, so can't really comment. And, as a fellow sportsman to de Cesaris, I would say that David Beckham is highly relevant, a good comparison between footballers and the sportspeople in question, Formula One drivers. You claim that Formula One drivers comparatively have too many categories, but they have less than a third than that of footballers?! Please, it's simple arithmetic. [[User:WilliamF1two|WilliamF1two]] ([[User talk:WilliamF1two|talk]]) 10:34, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
284112 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284111 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.261337280E09 +++$+++ My personal opinion of Beckham is not relevant, and I'm fairly sure Beckham interest in me is much the same as his interest in you. Firstly, Beckham is almost as much a celebrity as he is an athlete, but Beckham having 37 categories has no bearing on whether 13 is a lot for a formula one driver. 13 is still a lot. In chosing Beckham you've probably selected the most extreme example possible amongst athletes. -- +++$+++ :::::My personal opinion of Beckham is not relevant, and I'm fairly sure Beckham interest in me is much the same as his interest in you. Firstly, Beckham is almost as much a celebrity as he is an athlete, but Beckham having 37 categories has no bearing on whether 13 is a lot for a formula one driver. 13 is still a lot. In chosing Beckham you've probably selected the most extreme example possible amongst athletes. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 11:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
284113 +++$+++ WilliamF1two +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284112 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.261341600E09 +++$+++ What do you mean by the \"most extreme example possible\"? He is as much of a sportsman as de Cesaris, and barely any of his 37 categories are at all related to his \"celebrity\"?! You are deviating from the point.  +++$+++ ::::::What do you mean by the "most extreme example possible"? He is as much of a sportsman as de Cesaris, and barely any of his 37 categories are at all related to his "celebrity"?! You are deviating from the point. [[User:WilliamF1two|WilliamF1two]] ([[User talk:WilliamF1two|talk]]) 12:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
284114 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284113 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.261341660E09 +++$+++ Are there any with more than 37? -- +++$+++ :::::::Are there any with more than 37? --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 12:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
284115 +++$+++ WilliamF1two +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284114 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.261343400E09 +++$+++ Need any more examples?  +++$+++ ::::::::Need any more examples? [[User:WilliamF1two|WilliamF1two]] ([[User talk:WilliamF1two|talk]]) 13:10, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
284116 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284115 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.261344480E09 +++$+++ That footballers are WAY over-categorised? Nope, that's just fine. -- +++$+++ :::::::::That footballers are WAY over-categorised? Nope, that's just fine. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 13:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
284117 +++$+++ WilliamF1two +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284116 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.261347540E09 +++$+++ We are definatley getting away from the point. The original discussion was about Constructor Formula One driver categories,and this discussion isn't getting us anywhere.  +++$+++ ::::::::::We are definatley getting away from the point. The original discussion was about Constructor Formula One driver categories,and this discussion isn't getting us anywhere. [[User:WilliamF1two|WilliamF1two]] ([[User talk:WilliamF1two|talk]]) 14:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
284118 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284117 +++$+++ 2009-12-20 21:00:00 +++$+++ 1.261371600E09 +++$+++ Then don't use off-topic items as justification. -- +++$+++ :::::::::::Then don't use off-topic items as justification. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 21:00, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
284119 +++$+++ WilliamF1two +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284118 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.261419240E09 +++$+++ Once again, please explain how Beckham, Anelka, Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Dida and Beckenbauer are \"off-topic!\" Your just getting grumpy now, and that really isn't appropriate.  +++$+++ ::::::::::::Once again, please explain how Beckham, Anelka, Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Dida and Beckenbauer are "off-topic!" Your just getting grumpy now, and that really isn't appropriate. [[User:WilliamF1two|WilliamF1two]] ([[User talk:WilliamF1two|talk]]) 10:14, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
284120 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 10:49:00 +++$+++ 1.261421340E09 +++$+++ Because they are footballers. Is a tried to explain in the other thread, Formula One drivers are not even really relevant compared to other racing drivers. Footballers are sufficiently removed that they may as well be planets. Or vegetables. Or collectible decorated toy horses. -- +++$+++ :Because they are footballers. Is a tried to explain in the other thread, Formula One drivers are not even really relevant compared to other racing drivers. Footballers are sufficiently removed that they may as well be planets. Or vegetables. Or collectible decorated toy horses. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 10:49, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
284121 +++$+++ WilliamF1two +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284120 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.261445880E09 +++$+++ OK then - so how can you say that F1 drivers have too many categories, if you are not willing to compare them to anything else? Formula One drivers have to many categories, but yet they have fewer than decorated toy horses. Not working.  +++$+++ ::OK then - so how can you say that F1 drivers have too many categories, if you are not willing to compare them to anything else? Formula One drivers have to many categories, but yet they have fewer than decorated toy horses. Not working. [[User:WilliamF1two|WilliamF1two]] ([[User talk:WilliamF1two|talk]]) 17:38, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
284122 +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284121 +++$+++ 2009-12-21 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.261456620E09 +++$+++ Have a read of [[Wikipedia:Categorization#What categories should be created|this]] then we'll talk some more. -- +++$+++ :::Have a read of [[Wikipedia:Categorization#What categories should be created|this]] then we'll talk some more. --[[User:Falcadore|Falcadore]] ([[User talk:Falcadore#top|talk]]) 20:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
284123 +++$+++ WilliamF1two +++$+++ Falcadore +++$+++ 284107 +++$+++ 284122 +++$+++ 2009-12-22 12:12:00 +++$+++ 1.261512720E09 +++$+++ OK. An awful lot of this is down to personal interpretation. I believe that these are useful to readers, and therefore meet the first criteria. If a reader wanted to find a McLaren driver from history, this would be a good place to look! I also believe that the fact the Lewis Hamilton has driven for McLaren is a defining factor of him, and therefore meets the third criteria. You can take a look at [[Wikipedia:Overcategorization]], and tell me if any of these criteria for non-creation are applicable to these categories. It is possible that navigation boxes would be a better way for showing this, but this is worth a discussion. I think a list would be tedious. I do not believe that it is controversial, it is very simple if someone has driven for a team or not. And finally - no other categories exist that would give you similar results. I really don't see where you're coming from.  +++$+++ ::::OK. An awful lot of this is down to personal interpretation. I believe that these are useful to readers, and therefore meet the first criteria. If a reader wanted to find a McLaren driver from history, this would be a good place to look! I also believe that the fact the Lewis Hamilton has driven for McLaren is a defining factor of him, and therefore meets the third criteria. You can take a look at [[Wikipedia:Overcategorization]], and tell me if any of these criteria for non-creation are applicable to these categories. It is possible that navigation boxes would be a better way for showing this, but this is worth a discussion. I think a list would be tedious. I do not believe that it is controversial, it is very simple if someone has driven for a team or not. And finally - no other categories exist that would give you similar results. I really don't see where you're coming from. [[User:WilliamF1two|WilliamF1two]] ([[User talk:WilliamF1two|talk]]) 12:12, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

21964 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21964 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-29 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.177842720E09 +++$+++ Definitely not.  Just compare the Okinawan styles in [[Template:Karate_schools]] to the list.  And I'm not even sure how in depth to go with this list.  Shorin-ryu is listed, but should Kobayashi-ryu, and its offspring (Shido-kan and Shorinkan) be listed too?  -- +++$+++ Definitely not.  Just compare the Okinawan styles in [[Template:Karate_schools]] to the list.  And I'm not even sure how in depth to go with this list.  Shorin-ryu is listed, but should Kobayashi-ryu, and its offspring (Shido-kan and Shorinkan) be listed too?  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 03:32, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
21965 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21964 +++$+++ 21964 +++$+++ 2007-04-29 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.177852020E09 +++$+++ I figure that you can't have too many listed if the list is really that long.  I don't think anyone will object. Not super high on the priority list to get them added.  I just think it's good to have links to okinawan styles to sorta make people aware of the style.  +++$+++ :I figure that you can't have too many listed if the list is really that long.  I don't think anyone will object. Not super high on the priority list to get them added.  I just think it's good to have links to okinawan styles to sorta make people aware of the style. [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] 06:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

21969 +++$+++ Nate1481 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21969 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-01 14:30:00 +++$+++ 1.178055000E09 +++$+++ If you read the category pages, there is a differentiation between Jiu-Jitsu (bjj) and Jujutsu (Japanese) it's base on the different romanisations & is quit handy in this instance. (Also 'Brazilian Jiu-Jitsuka' is verging on nonsense and 'Jujutsuka' is used rather than jujutsu practitioners ) a brief description @ the top is the best you can do then it up to people to clean up mistakes. -- +++$+++ If you read the category pages, there is a differentiation between Jiu-Jitsu (bjj) and Jujutsu (Japanese) it's base on the different romanisations & is quit handy in this instance. (Also 'Brazilian Jiu-Jitsuka' is verging on nonsense and 'Jujutsuka' is used rather than jujutsu practitioners ) a brief description @ the top is the best you can do then it up to people to clean up mistakes. --[[User:Nate1481|Nate]] 14:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
21970 +++$+++ Nate1481 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21969 +++$+++ 21969 +++$+++ 2007-05-02 08:37:00 +++$+++ 1.178120220E09 +++$+++ 'Category:Brazilian Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu practitioners', is going to have to be a category if you want to split by country, the only way it can think to change it is to hyphenate to give '[country] Brazilian-Jiu-Jitsu practitioners'. The use of 'ka' to denote a practitioner is Japanese so using it for a south American art would be inappropriate. (re-posted on category talk)-- +++$+++ :'Category:Brazilian Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu practitioners', is going to have to be a category if you want to split by country, the only way it can think to change it is to hyphenate to give '[country] Brazilian-Jiu-Jitsu practitioners'. The use of 'ka' to denote a practitioner is Japanese so using it for a south American art would be inappropriate. (re-posted on category talk)--[[User:Nate1481|Nate]] 08:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

21973 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21973 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-06 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.178514120E09 +++$+++ Scott, do you have an makiwara while living in an apartment? or have you heard of anyone being able to do this?  I can't cement in to the floor and I can't screw in to the wood.  Any ideas?  +++$+++ Scott, do you have an makiwara while living in an apartment? or have you heard of anyone being able to do this?  I can't cement in to the floor and I can't screw in to the wood.  Any ideas? [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] 22:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
21974 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21973 +++$+++ 21973 +++$+++ 2007-05-06 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.178517060E09 +++$+++ What do you recommend for cushioning under the base?  +++$+++ :What do you recommend for cushioning under the base? [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] 22:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
21975 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21973 +++$+++ 21974 +++$+++ 2007-05-06 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.178518500E09 +++$+++ What height board to you recommend?  +++$+++ ::What height board to you recommend? [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] 23:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

524474 +++$+++ Roger Davies +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524474 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-05 11:38:00 +++$+++ 1.191609480E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Roger Davies|<font color="maroon">'''R<small>OGER</small>&nbsp;D<small>AVIES'''</small></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|''TALK'']]</sup> 11:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
524475 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524474 +++$+++ 524474 +++$+++ 2007-10-05 16:47:00 +++$+++ 1.191628020E09 +++$+++ Will try, let me think about how best to phrase it. I think Awadewit likes me, but in a way that makes this more difficult. If it was someone else, I could just say, look, [[WP:ENGVAR]] is a commonly accepted guideline, and it clearly doesn't make the article any worse, so while we can't make you do it, at least don't stop someone else from doing it, and they'd look at the little mop on my user page and probably behave. Maybe that will be the way to go, but I hope I can write it at least a little more nicely. -- +++$+++ : Will try, let me think about how best to phrase it. I think Awadewit likes me, but in a way that makes this more difficult. If it was someone else, I could just say, look, [[WP:ENGVAR]] is a commonly accepted guideline, and it clearly doesn't make the article any worse, so while we can't make you do it, at least don't stop someone else from doing it, and they'd look at the little mop on my user page and probably behave. Maybe that will be the way to go, but I hope I can write it at least a little more nicely. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 16:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

21977 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-08 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.178612460E09 +++$+++ I stumbled across [[Shito ryu]] and I knew that those templates in the article seemed out of date, but I wanted to know where to find directions on how to properly add the correct templates - or to notify someone else about it.  Are there many people at the martial arts project working on the template clean-up or is it just you?  +++$+++ I stumbled across [[Shito ryu]] and I knew that those templates in the article seemed out of date, but I wanted to know where to find directions on how to properly add the correct templates - or to notify someone else about it.  Are there many people at the martial arts project working on the template clean-up or is it just you? [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] 01:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
21978 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21977 +++$+++ 21977 +++$+++ 2007-05-08 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.178612700E09 +++$+++ I'll add the martial arts template.  Do I remove the major styles of karate template?  +++$+++ :I'll add the martial arts template.  Do I remove the major styles of karate template? [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] 01:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

284124 +++$+++ Tabor +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284124 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-17 16:03:00 +++$+++ 1.137542580E09 +++$+++ Might I ask why various \"List of X-letter combination\" subcategories have been included in [[:Category:Linguistics]]?  These have essentially nothing to do with linguistics, save that they are composed of letters\/digits (as is virtually anything else that may be expressed).  It is no more related to Linguistics than it is to, say, [[:Category:Combinatorics]].  In fact, it is probably more related to Combinatorics, though I would not suggest adding it to that category either. -- +++$+++ Might I ask why various "List of X-letter combination" subcategories have been included in [[:Category:Linguistics]]?  These have essentially nothing to do with linguistics, save that they are composed of letters/digits (as is virtually anything else that may be expressed).  It is no more related to Linguistics than it is to, say, [[:Category:Combinatorics]].  In fact, it is probably more related to Combinatorics, though I would not suggest adding it to that category either. --[[User:Tabor|Tabor]] 16:03, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
284125 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284124 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-17 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.137542880E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 16:08, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

284126 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284126 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-23 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.138072140E09 +++$+++ My guesses is that you want me punished for insulting you (eg removal of admin powers, banned from wikipedia etc). Let's discuss what you want you think the outcome of arbitration would be, and I'll see if I can accomodate.-- +++$+++ My guesses is that you want me punished for insulting you (eg removal of admin powers, banned from wikipedia etc). Let's discuss what you want you think the outcome of arbitration would be, and I'll see if I can accomodate.--[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] 19:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
284127 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284126 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-24 12:54:00 +++$+++ 1.138136040E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 12:54, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
284128 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284126 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-24 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.138141500E09 +++$+++ You obviously feel very strongly about my behaviour. As far as I'm concerned I haven't done anything wrong. Could you outline the problem?-- +++$+++ ::You obviously feel very strongly about my behaviour. As far as I'm concerned I haven't done anything wrong. Could you outline the problem?--[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] 14:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

21985 +++$+++ Anthony Appleyard +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21985 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-26 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.180234500E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] 19:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
21986 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21985 +++$+++ 21985 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.180234980E09 +++$+++ Is it possible for you to apply the changes made to the deleted WXRK back to the current article (as in any changes made to the WXRK page that existed from yesterday to today?  I happened to have a cached version in my history, so I reapplied all of the changes in one edit.  I'll get back to you on the Talk history.  I haven't sorted that out yet.  -- +++$+++ :Is it possible for you to apply the changes made to the deleted WXRK back to the current article (as in any changes made to the WXRK page that existed from yesterday to today?  I happened to have a cached version in my history, so I reapplied all of the changes in one edit.  I'll get back to you on the Talk history.  I haven't sorted that out yet.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 20:03, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
21987 +++$+++ Anthony Appleyard +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21985 +++$+++ 21985 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.180238940E09 +++$+++ The edit history of [[WXRK]] as it is now, will include the version that you want. If it is not the top version, it would be easy for you to find it in [[WXRK]]'s history list and revert to it.  +++$+++ * The edit history of [[WXRK]] as it is now, will include the version that you want. If it is not the top version, it would be easy for you to find it in [[WXRK]]'s history list and revert to it. [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] 21:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
21988 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21985 +++$+++ 21987 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.180239300E09 +++$+++ Actually, I think you forgot to complete this.  The log history for WXRK is missing the restore line.  The WKRI log has 'deleted \"WKRI\"' and then 'restored \"WKRI\" (270 revisions restored)', but the WXRK log only has 'deleted \"WXRK\"'.  -- +++$+++ ::Actually, I think you forgot to complete this.  The log history for WXRK is missing the restore line.  The WKRI log has 'deleted "WKRI"' and then 'restored "WKRI" (270 revisions restored)', but the WXRK log only has 'deleted "WXRK"'.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 21:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
21989 +++$+++ Anthony Appleyard +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21985 +++$+++ 21988 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.180240200E09 +++$+++ Done. Sorry. [[WXRK]] now has all its versions undeleted.  +++$+++ :::Done. Sorry. [[WXRK]] now has all its versions undeleted. [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] 21:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

284130 +++$+++ Mark Dingemanse +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284130 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-24 08:36:00 +++$+++ 1.140798960E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you tried to move Eep to EEP. You might want to weigh in at [[Talk:Eep]]. Thanks, &mdash;  +++$+++ I noticed that you tried to move Eep to EEP. You might want to weigh in at [[Talk:Eep]]. Thanks, &mdash; [[User:Mark Dingemanse|mark]] [[User Talk:Mark Dingemanse|&#9998;]] 08:36, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
284131 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284130 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-24 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.140818100E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 13:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

284132 +++$+++ JzG +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284132 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-06 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.141672260E09 +++$+++ I read the comments, thanks.  Does \"heap\" rhyme with \"keep\"?  An acronym is a ''pronounceable'' initialism, and the acronym EEP is ''pronounced'' identically to the acronym EAP.  +++$+++ I read the comments, thanks.  Does "heap" rhyme with "keep"?  An acronym is a ''pronounceable'' initialism, and the acronym EEP is ''pronounced'' identically to the acronym EAP. [[User Talk:JzG|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid; padding:0px 2px 2px 2px; color:white; background-color:darkblue; font-weight:bold">Guy</span> you know?]] 11:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
284133 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284132 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-06 11:19:00 +++$+++ 1.141672740E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 11:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

21990 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21990 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-26 20:22:00 +++$+++ 1.180236120E09 +++$+++ Then, reverting a page-blank in the current [[Talk:WXRK]] (will be [[Talk:WKRI]]) should get everything back to where it should be.  -- +++$+++ Then, reverting a page-blank in the current [[Talk:WXRK]] (will be [[Talk:WKRI]]) should get everything back to where it should be.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 20:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
21991 +++$+++ Anthony Appleyard +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21990 +++$+++ 21990 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 21:31:00 +++$+++ 1.180240260E09 +++$+++ Done. Please check the result.  +++$+++ *Done. Please check the result. [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] 21:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
21992 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21990 +++$+++ 21991 +++$+++ 2007-05-26 21:47:00 +++$+++ 1.180241220E09 +++$+++ [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] - thank you for straightening all this out.  I think everything is as it should be!  -- +++$+++ ::[[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] - thank you for straightening all this out.  I think everything is as it should be!  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 21:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

546279 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546279 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-07 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.262929860E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your recent contributions to articles on the topic of Scientology - [[All About Radiation]] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=All_About_Radiation&diff=prev&oldid=336473107], and [[Purification Rundown]] [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Purification_Rundown&diff=prev&oldid=336471147]. Perhaps you would like to work together to improve the quality of an article in the topic? ''' +++$+++ Thank you for your recent contributions to articles on the topic of Scientology - [[All About Radiation]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=All_About_Radiation&diff=prev&oldid=336473107], and [[Purification Rundown]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Purification_Rundown&diff=prev&oldid=336471147]. Perhaps you would like to work together to improve the quality of an article in the topic? '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 21:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
546280 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546279 +++$+++ 546279 +++$+++ 2010-01-07 22:34:00 +++$+++ 1.262932440E09 +++$+++ Your willingness to dive in and improve \"core\" type articles like [[Cat]] is most impressive. ''' +++$+++ :Your willingness to dive in and improve "core" type articles like [[Cat]] is most impressive. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 22:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
546281 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546279 +++$+++ 546280 +++$+++ 2010-01-07 22:49:00 +++$+++ 1.262933340E09 +++$+++ LOL, just so long as you do not end up like [[List_of_recurring_characters_in_The_Simpsons#Crazy_Cat_Lady|Eleanor Abernathy]]! Just kiddin, ''' +++$+++ ::LOL, just so long as you do not end up like [[List_of_recurring_characters_in_The_Simpsons#Crazy_Cat_Lady|Eleanor Abernathy]]! Just kiddin, '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 22:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

21994 +++$+++ Thesaddestday +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21994 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-22 03:27:00 +++$+++ 1.182508020E09 +++$+++ Sorry about the edit, it makes sense now  +++$+++ Sorry about the edit, it makes sense now [[User:Thesaddestday|Thesaddestday]] 03:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
21995 +++$+++ Thesaddestday +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21994 +++$+++ 21994 +++$+++ 2007-06-22 06:58:00 +++$+++ 1.182520680E09 +++$+++ Your idea is fine... the part that threw me off was \"Brazilian Brazilian\" haha, I just overlooked it and rushed through  +++$+++ :Your idea is fine... the part that threw me off was "Brazilian Brazilian" haha, I just overlooked it and rushed through [[User:Thesaddestday|Thesaddestday]] 06:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

284140 +++$+++ Johantheghost +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284140 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-05 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.141597860E09 +++$+++ Hi, can you do me a favour and tell me where the policy on acronym templates is written down?  I've been trudging through some relevant talk pages; but these aren't policy, and are such a mess of different ideas that I can't tell what the hell the final outcome is.  The actual policy pages don't talk about it as far as I can see, and I have no idea what to do if I create a new 3\/4 letter acronym.  Cheers, \u2014  +++$+++ Hi, can you do me a favour and tell me where the policy on acronym templates is written down?  I've been trudging through some relevant talk pages; but these aren't policy, and are such a mess of different ideas that I can't tell what the hell the final outcome is.  The actual policy pages don't talk about it as far as I can see, and I have no idea what to do if I create a new 3/4 letter acronym.  Cheers, — [[User:Johantheghost|Johan&nbsp;the&nbsp;Ghost]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Johantheghost|<sub>seance</sub>]] 14:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
284141 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284140 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-06 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.141668000E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 10:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
284142 +++$+++ Johantheghost +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284140 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-06 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.141671720E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that does seem to explain it.  I note that it's currently a proposal, not a policy; but if there's no prior policy in this area, I guess it's OK to start implementing it now.  Also, I assume that when it's accepted, it will be linked to from places like [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation and abbreviations]] so folks can find it.  Cheers, \u2014  +++$+++ ::Thanks, that does seem to explain it.  I note that it's currently a proposal, not a policy; but if there's no prior policy in this area, I guess it's OK to start implementing it now.  Also, I assume that when it's accepted, it will be linked to from places like [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation and abbreviations]] so folks can find it.  Cheers, — [[User:Johantheghost|Johan&nbsp;the&nbsp;Ghost]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Johantheghost|<sub>seance</sub>]] 11:02, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

265810 +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265810 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-28 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.164779100E09 +++$+++ [[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] is better at explaining than I am. Please ask him. I am still intimidated by all the harassment and discouraged.  Hope this is what you meant by a summary. If you wanted something else, let me know and I will try to do better.  +++$+++ [[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] is better at explaining than I am. Please ask him. I am still intimidated by all the harassment and discouraged.  Hope this is what you meant by a summary. If you wanted something else, let me know and I will try to do better. [[User:Mattisse|Mattisse]][[User_talk:Mattisse|(talk)]] 21:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
265811 +++$+++ Kylu +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265810 +++$+++ 265810 +++$+++ 2006-11-28 22:54:00 +++$+++ 1.164783240E09 +++$+++ [[User:Geo.plrd]] is the original mediator. <b><i><font color=\"#FF00FF\">~Kylu ( +++$+++ :[[User:Geo.plrd]] is the original mediator. <b><i><font color="#FF00FF">~Kylu ([[User:Kylu|u]]|[[User talk:Kylu|t]]) </font></i></b> 22:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
265812 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265810 +++$+++ 265810 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.164791220E09 +++$+++ I asked before  I was removed. I made a new heading so you could find it easier. G +++$+++ :I asked before  I was removed. I made a new heading so you could find it easier. G[[User:Geo.plrd/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]o. 01:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265813 +++$+++ Geo.plrd +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265810 +++$+++ 265810 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.164795420E09 +++$+++ Do you mean new heading as in this messages heading? <s>If not could you explain further.<\/s> G +++$+++ :Do you mean new heading as in this messages heading? <s>If not could you explain further.</s> G[[User:Geo.plrd/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]o. 02:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

21998 +++$+++ OsteopathicFreak +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21998 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-04 01:57:00 +++$+++ 1.183539420E09 +++$+++ I really appreciate the work you've done with allopathic\/osteopathic stuff.  I didn't agree with the move, as I think the term \"allopathic medicine\" in used 10x more frequently than \"allopathy\" which is hardly ever used.  I recently made some major changes to the [[Allopathic medicine]] in the hopes of clarifying some points about how the term in used. I hope they stick.  I think somewhere we need a table detailing the very specific differences in the two paths of becoming a licensed physician.  Perhaps on the Allopathic medicine page?   +++$+++ I really appreciate the work you've done with allopathic/osteopathic stuff.  I didn't agree with the move, as I think the term "allopathic medicine" in used 10x more frequently than "allopathy" which is hardly ever used.  I recently made some major changes to the [[Allopathic medicine]] in the hopes of clarifying some points about how the term in used. I hope they stick.  I think somewhere we need a table detailing the very specific differences in the two paths of becoming a licensed physician.  Perhaps on the Allopathic medicine page?  [[User:OsteopathicFreak|OsteopathicFreak]] 01:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
21999 +++$+++ OsteopathicFreak +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 21998 +++$+++ 21998 +++$+++ 2007-07-22 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.185094140E09 +++$+++ I've been making an effort to add to the [[:Category:Osteopathic medicine]], so that at least it can be known what articles are already present.  They are all in need of a lot of work, and many more need to be added.  Just wanted to give you some idea about the breadth of this topic. Always appreciate your input on these topics.  <font color=\"purple\"><sup>[[Touro University Gay-Straight Alliance|Touro ]]<\/sup>[[Osteopathic Medicine|Osteopathic]]<\/font><font color=\"blue\"> +++$+++ :I've been making an effort to add to the [[:Category:Osteopathic medicine]], so that at least it can be known what articles are already present.  They are all in need of a lot of work, and many more need to be added.  Just wanted to give you some idea about the breadth of this topic. Always appreciate your input on these topics.  <font color="purple"><sup>[[Touro University Gay-Straight Alliance|Touro ]]</sup>[[Osteopathic Medicine|Osteopathic]]</font><font color="blue">[[User:OsteopathicFreak|Freak]]</font> <sup><font color="purple">[[User talk:OsteopathicFreak|T ]]</font></sup> 01:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

47357 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47357 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-14 16:50:00 +++$+++ 1.216079400E09 +++$+++ I saw you cite from Mednis' ''Practical Bishop Endings'' and I have a question for you.  On page 94 (bottom), he says that the farther apart the pawns are, the more likely they are to win, except for two rook pawns if the defending king is in front of the \"wrong\" rook pawn.  But it seems to me that with two widely-separated pawns, when one is the \"wrong rook pawn\" and the defending king is in front of it, it doesn't matter much which file the other pawn is on, if the defending bishop can control a square in front of it, because the bishop can be sacrificed for the pawn, leaving the king in front of the \"wrong rook pawn\", and the position is drawn.  Is this right?   +++$+++ I saw you cite from Mednis' ''Practical Bishop Endings'' and I have a question for you.  On page 94 (bottom), he says that the farther apart the pawns are, the more likely they are to win, except for two rook pawns if the defending king is in front of the "wrong" rook pawn.  But it seems to me that with two widely-separated pawns, when one is the "wrong rook pawn" and the defending king is in front of it, it doesn't matter much which file the other pawn is on, if the defending bishop can control a square in front of it, because the bishop can be sacrificed for the pawn, leaving the king in front of the "wrong rook pawn", and the position is drawn.  Is this right?  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 16:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
47358 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47357 +++$+++ 47357 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 02:57:00 +++$+++ 1.216115820E09 +++$+++ Yes, that is exactly right. In those circumstances, it is a draw, period, irrespective of the number of files separating the two pawns.  +++$+++ :Yes, that is exactly right. In those circumstances, it is a draw, period, irrespective of the number of files separating the two pawns. [[User:Krakatoa|Krakatoa]] ([[User talk:Krakatoa#top|talk]]) 02:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
47359 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47357 +++$+++ 47358 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.216124640E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  Last night I gave my 11-year-old daughter a handicap, and we got to K+R vs K+N.  I told her I could hold the draw because the knight was close to the king.  But my king was stuck on the edge, and she won!   +++$+++ ::Thanks.  Last night I gave my 11-year-old daughter a handicap, and we got to K+R vs K+N.  I told her I could hold the draw because the knight was close to the king.  But my king was stuck on the edge, and she won!  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 05:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
47360 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47357 +++$+++ 47359 +++$+++ 2008-07-15 07:16:00 +++$+++ 1.216131360E09 +++$+++ Pretty good! My daughter (like her mother) has always refused to even learn the game. :-(  +++$+++ :::Pretty good! My daughter (like her mother) has always refused to even learn the game. :-( [[User:Krakatoa|Krakatoa]] ([[User talk:Krakatoa#top|talk]]) 07:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
47361 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47357 +++$+++ 47360 +++$+++ 2008-08-14 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.218705060E09 +++$+++ She got me un zugzwang, and she doesn't even know the term.   +++$+++ :::: She got me un zugzwang, and she doesn't even know the term.  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 02:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

284144 +++$+++ Haiduc +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284144 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-10 15:53:00 +++$+++ 1.136937180E09 +++$+++ I am not sure that your removal of the \"Education\" category is defensible, in light of the central role that pederasty played in the educational systems of the Greeks and the Japanese (and its mentions in the context of Islamic pedagogy). Can you comment?   +++$+++ I am not sure that your removal of the "Education" category is defensible, in light of the central role that pederasty played in the educational systems of the Greeks and the Japanese (and its mentions in the context of Islamic pedagogy). Can you comment?  [[User:Haiduc|Haiduc]] 15:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
284145 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284144 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-10 22:19:00 +++$+++ 1.136960340E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 22:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
284146 +++$+++ Haiduc +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284144 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-11 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.136966700E09 +++$+++ Thank you, good idea. [[Pederasty in Ancient Greece]] and [[Shudo]] should be a good fit.  +++$+++ :::Thank you, good idea. [[Pederasty in Ancient Greece]] and [[Shudo]] should be a good fit. [[User:Haiduc|Haiduc]] 00:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

22003 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22003 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-21 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.185057660E09 +++$+++ Is this Iha Sensei's kobudo bojistu (sp?) style? I think it is.  Is the lineage that he has on the wall at the dojo for this style listed anywhere online?  I'm trying to remember the name of the Okinawan who taught this to Oshiro (sp?) as well.  I hear Oshiro's teaches the same style in Redwood, CA (is that the right city??).  Is Oshiro on wikipedia?  Does the Iha Sensei page discuss his kobudo teachings adequately or is there room for improvement.  What are you thoughts?  +++$+++ Is this Iha Sensei's kobudo bojistu (sp?) style? I think it is.  Is the lineage that he has on the wall at the dojo for this style listed anywhere online?  I'm trying to remember the name of the Okinawan who taught this to Oshiro (sp?) as well.  I hear Oshiro's teaches the same style in Redwood, CA (is that the right city??).  Is Oshiro on wikipedia?  Does the Iha Sensei page discuss his kobudo teachings adequately or is there room for improvement.  What are you thoughts? [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] 15:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
22004 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22003 +++$+++ 22003 +++$+++ 2007-07-21 15:49:00 +++$+++ 1.185058140E09 +++$+++ No it is http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Yamanni_ryu I think which I will add to the comparison of kobudo styles.  +++$+++ : No it is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamanni_ryu I think which I will add to the comparison of kobudo styles. [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] 15:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

284149 +++$+++ BD2412 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284149 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-03-26 02:33:00 +++$+++ 1.143369180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for noting that. I hate to broach this topic, but since you're not an admin, why are you closing deletion discussions that result in \"delete\" decisions? See [[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-Administrators closing discussions]] for guidelines on non-admins closing discussions. I'd support you for adminship based on your contributions, though I can see from this page that you might meet some resistance.  +++$+++ Thanks for noting that. I hate to broach this topic, but since you're not an admin, why are you closing deletion discussions that result in "delete" decisions? See [[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-Administrators closing discussions]] for guidelines on non-admins closing discussions. I'd support you for adminship based on your contributions, though I can see from this page that you might meet some resistance. [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:gold">'''''BD2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 02:33, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
284150 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284149 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-26 03:23:00 +++$+++ 1.143372180E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 03:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
284151 +++$+++ BD2412 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284149 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-26 03:56:00 +++$+++ 1.143374160E09 +++$+++ The templates are helpful, and certainly it helps to have non-admins catching up the backlog. Maybe the rule should be changed (see also [{WP:IAR]]). Adminship votes do have a \"popularity\" element, but popularity on Wikipedia is largely premised on participation and good interactions, which are good admin indicators. I certainly think you'd do well with the tools!  +++$+++ ::The templates are helpful, and certainly it helps to have non-admins catching up the backlog. Maybe the rule should be changed (see also [{WP:IAR]]). Adminship votes do have a "popularity" element, but popularity on Wikipedia is largely premised on participation and good interactions, which are good admin indicators. I certainly think you'd do well with the tools! [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:gold">'''''BD2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 03:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

546294 +++$+++ Ronz +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-25 18:58:00 +++$+++ 1.264474680E09 +++$+++ I'm debating whether or not to mass revert his spamming.  While I've not reviewed his edits in detail, they all need to be reviewed because he's not, and he's sometimes adding them to the wrong articles. -- +++$+++ I'm debating whether or not to mass revert his spamming.  While I've not reviewed his edits in detail, they all need to be reviewed because he's not, and he's sometimes adding them to the wrong articles. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 18:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
546295 +++$+++ Ronz +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546294 +++$+++ 546294 +++$+++ 2010-01-25 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.264476420E09 +++$+++ Just to be clear, I'm going to wait until I see how they respond to the discussion on the editor's talk page. -- +++$+++ :Just to be clear, I'm going to wait until I see how they respond to the discussion on the editor's talk page. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 19:27, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
546296 +++$+++ EdJohnston +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546294 +++$+++ 546295 +++$+++ 2010-01-25 19:54:00 +++$+++ 1.264478040E09 +++$+++ Even if the new links end up being valuable, it creates awkwardness if we are endorsing the actions of an editor who refuses to participate in discussions. They have never commented at User talk and they have only left one comment on article Talk ever. (This seems likely to be a private individual and not an office at NIH. The IP geolocates to Louisville, KY). Do we have the ability to add these links on our own?  I would suggest we seriously consider a 1-week block but not revert the edits, unless they are individually checked.  +++$+++ ::Even if the new links end up being valuable, it creates awkwardness if we are endorsing the actions of an editor who refuses to participate in discussions. They have never commented at User talk and they have only left one comment on article Talk ever. (This seems likely to be a private individual and not an office at NIH. The IP geolocates to Louisville, KY). Do we have the ability to add these links on our own?  I would suggest we seriously consider a 1-week block but not revert the edits, unless they are individually checked. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
546297 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546294 +++$+++ 546296 +++$+++ 2010-01-25 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.264479000E09 +++$+++ Replied [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Incidents#Addition_of_links_to_National_Institutes_of_Health_GeneReviews|here]].  +++$+++ :::Replied [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Addition_of_links_to_National_Institutes_of_Health_GeneReviews|here]]. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 20:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

22008 +++$+++ User5802 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22008 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-13 05:15:00 +++$+++ 1.189685700E09 +++$+++ If you're willing to do this it would be great. Creation a kata infobox would probably get copied to every other Kata on Wikipedia and would be awesome also.  +++$+++ If you're willing to do this it would be great. Creation a kata infobox would probably get copied to every other Kata on Wikipedia and would be awesome also. [[User:User5802|User5802]] 05:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
22009 +++$+++ User5802 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22008 +++$+++ 22008 +++$+++ 2007-09-13 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.189728120E09 +++$+++ Those fields sound great although I think you shouldn't include the level (beginner, intermediate, advanced). There will be WAY to much debate as to what level forms are at.  +++$+++ :Those fields sound great although I think you shouldn't include the level (beginner, intermediate, advanced). There will be WAY to much debate as to what level forms are at. [[User:User5802|User5802]] 17:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

284157 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284157 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-15 05:09:00 +++$+++ 1.137330540E09 +++$+++ You ''fixed up'' [[Photuris]] by doing a cut\/paste move. Various edits were hidden\/lost when you did that, violating the GFDL licence. I have performed a history merge so everyone gets credit for their work. Never perform a cut and paste move, it's that simple.-- +++$+++ You ''fixed up'' [[Photuris]] by doing a cut/paste move. Various edits were hidden/lost when you did that, violating the GFDL licence. I have performed a history merge so everyone gets credit for their work. Never perform a cut and paste move, it's that simple.--[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] 05:09, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
284158 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284157 +++$+++ 284157 +++$+++ 2006-01-15 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.137339000E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 07:30, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

284159 +++$+++ Natalya +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284159 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-17 12:40:00 +++$+++ 1.137530400E09 +++$+++ Thanks for cleaning up the [[FAST]] disambiguation page.  If you take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)|Manual of Style regarding disambiguation pages]], it shows that the leading lines should not just be the word, which is why I'm changing that back (just wanted to let you know that there was a reason).  Also, unless all of the links are equally common, the general practice is to list the links in order of most common to least common.  Alphabetical order is usually only used in a list of names or places (also from the Manual of Style). --  +++$+++ Thanks for cleaning up the [[FAST]] disambiguation page.  If you take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)|Manual of Style regarding disambiguation pages]], it shows that the leading lines should not just be the word, which is why I'm changing that back (just wanted to let you know that there was a reason).  Also, unless all of the links are equally common, the general practice is to list the links in order of most common to least common.  Alphabetical order is usually only used in a list of names or places (also from the Manual of Style). -- [[User:Natalya|Natalya]] 12:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
284160 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-17 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.137535140E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 13:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
284161 +++$+++ Natalya +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284159 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-17 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.137555360E09 +++$+++ I stand corrected (and have subsequently read up on the progress being made). --  +++$+++ :: I stand corrected (and have subsequently read up on the progress being made). -- [[User:Natalya|Natalya]] 19:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

22016 +++$+++ Herbythyme +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22016 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-30 13:43:00 +++$+++ 1.196458980E09 +++$+++ Hi - trying to get the backlog out of the way here.  I'm prepared to whitelist the two pages that you requested if you still want them.  Nudge me?  Cheers -- +++$+++ Hi - trying to get the backlog out of the way here.  I'm prepared to whitelist the two pages that you requested if you still want them.  Nudge me?  Cheers --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 13:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
22017 +++$+++ Herbythyme +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22016 +++$+++ 22016 +++$+++ 2007-11-30 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.196462340E09 +++$+++ No problem - happy to help & sorry it took so long, cheers -- +++$+++ :No problem - happy to help & sorry it took so long, cheers --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small></sup></b> 14:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

284163 +++$+++ Morven +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284163 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-28 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.138476720E09 +++$+++ I have reverted your move of [[V8]] to [[V8 engine]] as contrary to common primary-topic disambiguation style.  If the engine is important enough to be the primary topic at [[V8]], it should actually be at that page name, since it is the most commonly used name.  We do not unnecessarily disambiguate names. \u2014 +++$+++ I have reverted your move of [[V8]] to [[V8 engine]] as contrary to common primary-topic disambiguation style.  If the engine is important enough to be the primary topic at [[V8]], it should actually be at that page name, since it is the most commonly used name.  We do not unnecessarily disambiguate names. —[[User:Morven|Matthew Brown]] ([[User talk:Morven|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Morven|C]]) 11:32, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
284164 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284163 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-28 14:29:00 +++$+++ 1.138487340E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 14:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
284165 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284163 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-27 05:08:00 +++$+++ 1.143464880E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 05:08, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
284166 +++$+++ Folajimi +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284163 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-27 05:32:00 +++$+++ 1.143466320E09 +++$+++ Mea culpa; I misinterpreted what you were up to. The edit summary you left on the '''Paul Hernandez''' entry mentioned \"deletion\", and that was all it took to trip me up. All's well, I guess. Carry on.  +++$+++ :*Mea culpa; I misinterpreted what you were up to. The edit summary you left on the '''Paul Hernandez''' entry mentioned "deletion", and that was all it took to trip me up. All's well, I guess. Carry on. [[User:Folajimi|Folajimi]] 05:32, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
284167 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284163 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-03-27 05:40:00 +++$+++ 1.143466800E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 05:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

22023 +++$+++ WhatamIdoing +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22023 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-02 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.202014080E09 +++$+++ Hi, Scott.  When you're replacing the ClinMed tags, could you make sure that the new ones read <nowiki>{{WPMED|class=|importance=}}<\/nowiki>?  Otherwise, the assessment script can't handle it correctly.  Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi, Scott.  When you're replacing the ClinMed tags, could you make sure that the new ones read <nowiki>{{WPMED|class=|importance=}}</nowiki>?  Otherwise, the assessment script can't handle it correctly.  Thanks, [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 20:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
22024 +++$+++ WhatamIdoing +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22023 +++$+++ 22023 +++$+++ 2008-02-02 21:01:00 +++$+++ 1.202014860E09 +++$+++ Ah, I see that I was inspecific.  It's not ''that'' assessment-related script, it's ''[[User talk:Outriggr\/assessment.js|this]]'' assessment-related script that seems to cope ungracefully.  It has a habit of \"forgetting\" the importance rating if the parameter isn't already in place.  Thanks,  +++$+++ :Ah, I see that I was inspecific.  It's not ''that'' assessment-related script, it's ''[[User talk:Outriggr/assessment.js|this]]'' assessment-related script that seems to cope ungracefully.  It has a habit of "forgetting" the importance rating if the parameter isn't already in place.  Thanks, [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 21:01, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
22025 +++$+++ Una Smith +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22023 +++$+++ 22024 +++$+++ 2008-02-03 00:06:00 +++$+++ 1.202025960E09 +++$+++ Cool.  Some of the horse projects could use the same treatment.  Please?  Drop in on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Equine]].  -- +++$+++ ::Cool.  Some of the horse projects could use the same treatment.  Please?  Drop in on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Equine]].  --[[User:Una Smith|Una Smith]] ([[User talk:Una Smith|talk]]) 00:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

284168 +++$+++ Kusma +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284168 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-01 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.143961140E09 +++$+++ You recently reverted my change of {{tl|numberdis}} to {{tl|disambig}} on [[2001: A Space Odyssey]]. I am a bit unhappy with the interplay between the wording on the template and the category, and would like to hear your comments at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation]]. Regards,  +++$+++ You recently reverted my change of {{tl|numberdis}} to {{tl|disambig}} on [[2001: A Space Odyssey]]. I am a bit unhappy with the interplay between the wording on the template and the category, and would like to hear your comments at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation]]. Regards, [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 22:59, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
284169 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284168 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-01 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.143961320E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 23:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
284170 +++$+++ Kusma +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284168 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-01 23:17:00 +++$+++ 1.143962220E09 +++$+++ I must admit I had only read the edit summary, not the actual content of your edit... Your italicization style there is rather pretty, I have to remember to use that the next time I clean up a disambiguation page.  +++$+++ ::I must admit I had only read the edit summary, not the actual content of your edit... Your italicization style there is rather pretty, I have to remember to use that the next time I clean up a disambiguation page. [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 23:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
284171 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284168 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-01 23:22:00 +++$+++ 1.143962520E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 23:22, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

546313 +++$+++ Obankston +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546313 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-14 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.266220320E09 +++$+++ I would like to move the section [[cat senses#Computer simulation of the cat brain]] from [[cat senses]] to [[cat intelligence]]. Comments?  +++$+++ I would like to move the section [[cat senses#Computer simulation of the cat brain]] from [[cat senses]] to [[cat intelligence]]. Comments? [[User:Obankston|Obankston]] ([[User talk:Obankston|talk]]) 23:52, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
546314 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546313 +++$+++ 546313 +++$+++ 2010-02-15 00:32:00 +++$+++ 1.266222720E09 +++$+++ Seems a good idea, fine by me.  +++$+++ :Seems a good idea, fine by me. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 00:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
546315 +++$+++ Obankston +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546313 +++$+++ 546314 +++$+++ 2010-02-15 03:13:00 +++$+++ 1.266232380E09 +++$+++ I completed moving the section.  +++$+++ ::I completed moving the section. [[User:Obankston|Obankston]] ([[User talk:Obankston|talk]]) 03:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

22027 +++$+++ Jwri7474 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22027 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-09 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.202563380E09 +++$+++ All these medical programs regardless of what they call their degree or what they require for admissions are equal degrees in the field of Medicine.  They teach the exact same things at the exact same level.   +++$+++ All these medical programs regardless of what they call their degree or what they require for admissions are equal degrees in the field of Medicine.  They teach the exact same things at the exact same level.  [[User:Jwri7474|Jwri7474]] ([[User talk:Jwri7474|talk]]) 05:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
22028 +++$+++ Emrgmgmtca +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22027 +++$+++ 22027 +++$+++ 2009-02-06 11:16:00 +++$+++ 1.233947760E09 +++$+++ Not to put to fine a point on this debate, an UNDERGRADUATE is someone who has not yet received ANY degree, period.  A postgrad is someone who has already received a degree and is pursuing another, or an expanded, course of study.  This may be at either a Master's or a Doctorate level.  There are a whole range of profession-specific qualifications which are called Doctorates, including MD, DDS, JD, etc., which do not match the requirements for a PhD, which in most cases has a specific requirement to demonstrate one's ability to perform original research related to whichever field the PhD is granted in.  There are places in Europe, and in the U.K. specifically, where the entry level to practice medicine is a Bachelor's degree in medicine (M.B.), which is regarded as an equivalent (and some would argue, more difficult to obtain) to a North American M.D..  Training beyond the Doctoral level is not generally referred to in the academic community as postgraduate;  more often it is referred to as post-doctoral, or in some cases, as a fellowship.  Only the Russians have an actual degree above the Doctorate, which they call an Academician's degree.  Don't know too much about that...they are the only ones that I am aware of who are using it.   +++$+++ :Not to put to fine a point on this debate, an UNDERGRADUATE is someone who has not yet received ANY degree, period.  A postgrad is someone who has already received a degree and is pursuing another, or an expanded, course of study.  This may be at either a Master's or a Doctorate level.  There are a whole range of profession-specific qualifications which are called Doctorates, including MD, DDS, JD, etc., which do not match the requirements for a PhD, which in most cases has a specific requirement to demonstrate one's ability to perform original research related to whichever field the PhD is granted in.  There are places in Europe, and in the U.K. specifically, where the entry level to practice medicine is a Bachelor's degree in medicine (M.B.), which is regarded as an equivalent (and some would argue, more difficult to obtain) to a North American M.D..  Training beyond the Doctoral level is not generally referred to in the academic community as postgraduate;  more often it is referred to as post-doctoral, or in some cases, as a fellowship.  Only the Russians have an actual degree above the Doctorate, which they call an Academician's degree.  Don't know too much about that...they are the only ones that I am aware of who are using it.  [[User:Emrgmgmtca|Emrgmgmtca]] ([[User talk:Emrgmgmtca|talk]]) 11:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

22031 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22031 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-18 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.205823600E09 +++$+++ Hmm.  Cool template, but should we add more of the coat colors articles from the category to it?  (There are TONS more...)   +++$+++ Hmm.  Cool template, but should we add more of the coat colors articles from the category to it?  (There are TONS more...)  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 00:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
22032 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22031 +++$+++ 22031 +++$+++ 2008-03-18 03:08:00 +++$+++ 1.205834880E09 +++$+++ I'll look it over.   Some \"color breeds\" sort of span both categories, gets complicated.  I like the navigation template, though.  I wonder if something off of the veterinary medicine stuff would work for horse diseases?  May be too complicated.  Just a thought.   +++$+++ :I'll look it over.   Some "color breeds" sort of span both categories, gets complicated.  I like the navigation template, though.  I wonder if something off of the veterinary medicine stuff would work for horse diseases?  May be too complicated.  Just a thought.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 03:08, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
22033 +++$+++ Anthony Appleyard +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22031 +++$+++ 22031 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 10:57:00 +++$+++ 1.209146220E09 +++$+++ You tagged [[Emergency medical technician-intermediate]] <nowiki>{{db-move}}<\/nowiki>, providing a link to move [[Emergency medical technician-intermediate]] over this page. But that is the same page. Please what do you want to be done?  +++$+++ *You tagged [[Emergency medical technician-intermediate]] <nowiki>{{db-move}}</nowiki>, providing a link to move [[Emergency medical technician-intermediate]] over this page. But that is the same page. Please what do you want to be done? [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] ([[User talk:Anthony Appleyard|talk]]) 10:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
22034 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22031 +++$+++ 22033 +++$+++ 2008-04-25 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.209155520E09 +++$+++ I put the wrong page name in.  I should have put [[EMT Intermediate]].  I reapplied the db-move tag with the correct article.  -- +++$+++ **I put the wrong page name in.  I should have put [[EMT Intermediate]].  I reapplied the db-move tag with the correct article.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 13:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

284176 +++$+++ Saxifrage +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284176 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-01 22:43:00 +++$+++ 1.143960180E09 +++$+++ Having taken [[User:Saxifrage\/coor_title_CSS|a look at the idea]], I wouldn't actually recommend any changes for the other skins. This placement really suits Monobook, but the others all have much more classic layouts that don't lend themselves well to these kinds of placement tricks. If someone had a good idea and needed some CSS expertise, I could work something up. As it is, I think it doesn't need special treatment in other skins. &mdash;  +++$+++ Having taken [[User:Saxifrage/coor_title_CSS|a look at the idea]], I wouldn't actually recommend any changes for the other skins. This placement really suits Monobook, but the others all have much more classic layouts that don't lend themselves well to these kinds of placement tricks. If someone had a good idea and needed some CSS expertise, I could work something up. As it is, I think it doesn't need special treatment in other skins. &mdash; [[User:Saxifrage|Saxifrage]] [[User talk:Saxifrage|&#9998;]] 22:43, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
284177 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284176 +++$+++ 284176 +++$+++ 2006-04-02 01:50:00 +++$+++ 1.143971400E09 +++$+++ Saxifrage, this has to be done for the other skins, or it appears in the middle of templates, and at the bottom of pages, and is Really Ugly. -- +++$+++ :Saxifrage, this has to be done for the other skins, or it appears in the middle of templates, and at the bottom of pages, and is Really Ugly. --[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 01:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
284178 +++$+++ Saxifrage +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284176 +++$+++ 284177 +++$+++ 2006-04-02 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.143973560E09 +++$+++ Alternatively, we may want to reconsider putting it in infoboxes at all. Leaving it to be manually placed in articles allows for more flexibility, and using a bot it wouldn't be any more work either. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::Alternatively, we may want to reconsider putting it in infoboxes at all. Leaving it to be manually placed in articles allows for more flexibility, and using a bot it wouldn't be any more work either. &mdash; [[User:Saxifrage|Saxifrage]] [[User talk:Saxifrage|&#9998;]] 03:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

527960 +++$+++ Charles +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527960 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-27 18:19:00 +++$+++ 1.185585540E09 +++$+++ Why was this image deleted? The image was used and released with permission by the site owner, Timo Ewalds, for use here on Wikipedia. Timo owns Nexopia and is able to extend that permission.  +++$+++ Why was this image deleted? The image was used and released with permission by the site owner, Timo Ewalds, for use here on Wikipedia. Timo owns Nexopia and is able to extend that permission. [[User talk:Charles|Charles]] 18:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
527961 +++$+++ DeadBot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527960 +++$+++ 527960 +++$+++ 2007-07-28 11:25:00 +++$+++ 1.185647100E09 +++$+++ If so, you need to state this along with proof, such as them stating it on their website. [[User:TheFearow|Matt\/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions\/TheFearow|(Contribs)]]  +++$+++ :If so, you need to state this along with proof, such as them stating it on their website. [[User:TheFearow|Matt/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/TheFearow|(Contribs)]] [[User:DeadBot|(Bot)]]</small> 11:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

284179 +++$+++ Cadillac +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-04 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.144179360E09 +++$+++ Your recent change of the coordinates for Canadian Towns has created a second entry line. Check some of the Canadian Towns in Alberta for instance, e.g., [[Acme, Alberta]], [[Stirling, Alberta]], etc. Is there some way you can correct that problem or go back to what we had before?  +++$+++ Your recent change of the coordinates for Canadian Towns has created a second entry line. Check some of the Canadian Towns in Alberta for instance, e.g., [[Acme, Alberta]], [[Stirling, Alberta]], etc. Is there some way you can correct that problem or go back to what we had before? [[User:Cadillac|Cadillac]] 12:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
284180 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284179 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-04 14:58:00 +++$+++ 1.144187880E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 14:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

284181 +++$+++ Cadillac +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284181 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-04 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.144214460E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Cadillac|Cadillac]] 22:21, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
284182 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284181 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-05 00:38:00 +++$+++ 1.144222680E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 00:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

284183 +++$+++ Cadillac +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284183 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-05 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.144224780E09 +++$+++ Excuse my ignorance, but what is a skin?  +++$+++ Excuse my ignorance, but what is a skin? [[User:Cadillac|Cadillac]] 01:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
284184 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284183 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-05 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.144225860E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 01:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

22041 +++$+++ Jclemens +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22041 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-13 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.213412100E09 +++$+++ Scottalter, thanks for help with the first aid (topics) template.  Any other feedback on things I should do different with templates in the future?  In case it didn't show, that was my first effort at creating one like that.  +++$+++ Scottalter, thanks for help with the first aid (topics) template.  Any other feedback on things I should do different with templates in the future?  In case it didn't show, that was my first effort at creating one like that. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 19:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
22042 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22041 +++$+++ 22041 +++$+++ 2008-06-13 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.213413660E09 +++$+++ Using words like \"topics\" in a title is usually not required, but since there was already a different template at {{tl|First aid}} ({{tl|WikiProject First aid}} was there), I think what you did was appropriate.  Also, <nowiki><noinclude><\/noinclude><\/nowiki> tags should be used when dealing with the categorization of templates.  This means that what is between the tags should not be included when the template is transcluded to pages.  For the most part, templates should not automatically assign categories to pages it is transcluded on.  Other than that, the template looks good - for a beginner or anyone else.  -- +++$+++ :Using words like "topics" in a title is usually not required, but since there was already a different template at {{tl|First aid}} ({{tl|WikiProject First aid}} was there), I think what you did was appropriate.  Also, <nowiki><noinclude></noinclude></nowiki> tags should be used when dealing with the categorization of templates.  This means that what is between the tags should not be included when the template is transcluded to pages.  For the most part, templates should not automatically assign categories to pages it is transcluded on.  Other than that, the template looks good - for a beginner or anyone else.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 20:21, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
22043 +++$+++ Jclemens +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22041 +++$+++ 22042 +++$+++ 2008-06-15 02:58:00 +++$+++ 1.213523880E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Thanks! [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 02:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

284186 +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284186 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-12 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.144894440E09 +++$+++ So, I do encourage you to resubmit.  I untagged the entries from the last two as I closed them, and they will need to be retagged if you resubmit (just revert me).  I did not untag the ones from the first submission.  A single new umbrella submission, listing out exactly how the categories are to be renamed, is what I recommend. -  +++$+++ So, I do encourage you to resubmit.  I untagged the entries from the last two as I closed them, and they will need to be retagged if you resubmit (just revert me).  I did not untag the ones from the first submission.  A single new umbrella submission, listing out exactly how the categories are to be renamed, is what I recommend. - [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] 19:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
284187 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284186 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-12 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.144909920E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 23:32, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
284188 +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284186 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-13 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.144963500E09 +++$+++ If you do head to the project, I would suggest you be careful about tossing around words like \"ignorant\".  While not quite rising to the level of personal attack (IMHO), labeling your opponents like that is not the kind of thing that helps in persuading them to your point of view. -  +++$+++ ::: If you do head to the project, I would suggest you be careful about tossing around words like "ignorant".  While not quite rising to the level of personal attack (IMHO), labeling your opponents like that is not the kind of thing that helps in persuading them to your point of view. - [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] 14:25, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

22044 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22044 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-15 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.213516920E09 +++$+++ but on the offchance that you hadn't I wanted to pass it along.  No need to reply. cheers and thank you!  +++$+++ but on the offchance that you hadn't I wanted to pass it along.  No need to reply. cheers and thank you! [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] ([[User talk:Tkjazzer|talk]]) 01:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
22045 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22044 +++$+++ 22044 +++$+++ 2008-06-15 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.213591680E09 +++$+++ Thanks.  Actually, I was unaware of that project.  It looks interesting, but I'm not sure what they've actually achieved...it seems mostly like a project of template-related projects.  And I see that you've been editing anonymously a bit lately.  I like your ideas, but most are either challenging or a lot of work to implement.  -- +++$+++ :Thanks.  Actually, I was unaware of that project.  It looks interesting, but I'm not sure what they've actually achieved...it seems mostly like a project of template-related projects.  And I see that you've been editing anonymously a bit lately.  I like your ideas, but most are either challenging or a lot of work to implement.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 21:48, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

284189 +++$+++ Aucaman +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284189 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-14 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.145018520E09 +++$+++ Could you take a look at this article and drop a note as to whether or not \"Arabian Gulf\" should be bold-faced? Thanks.  +++$+++ Could you take a look at this article and drop a note as to whether or not "Arabian Gulf" should be bold-faced? Thanks. [[User:Aucaman|'''Aucaman''']]<sup>[[User_talk:Aucaman|Talk]]</sup> 05:42, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
284190 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284189 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-15 16:44:00 +++$+++ 1.145144640E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 16:44, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

22046 +++$+++ Jclemens +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22046 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-15 07:31:00 +++$+++ 1.213540260E09 +++$+++ Actually, the Fire-only fire service, for all its inflated ego, is pretty much a dinosaur.  East Coast fire-only fire departments are rife with tradition and testosterone poisoning, while the West Coast tends to be a lot different: better educated, higher paid, more medical.  The \"fire service\" is really a misnomer, because for a fire\/EMS department, 80% are EMS calls, and the rest are mostly car wrecks and grass fires--structural fires are a true rarity for most departments, and with current wood frame construction, any house that catches on fire is a total loss anyways!  The observation that the fire service is moving to EMS departments who also put out fires is really accurate.  Unfortunately, it's hard to envision a system more resistant to structural and mission changes, given the entrenched, seniority-based leadership.  Yet... we are still the ones who run into the burning buildings when the need requires it, and that's a thousand times sexier than being the \"Elderly Management Service.\"  +++$+++ Actually, the Fire-only fire service, for all its inflated ego, is pretty much a dinosaur.  East Coast fire-only fire departments are rife with tradition and testosterone poisoning, while the West Coast tends to be a lot different: better educated, higher paid, more medical.  The "fire service" is really a misnomer, because for a fire/EMS department, 80% are EMS calls, and the rest are mostly car wrecks and grass fires--structural fires are a true rarity for most departments, and with current wood frame construction, any house that catches on fire is a total loss anyways!  The observation that the fire service is moving to EMS departments who also put out fires is really accurate.  Unfortunately, it's hard to envision a system more resistant to structural and mission changes, given the entrenched, seniority-based leadership.  Yet... we are still the ones who run into the burning buildings when the need requires it, and that's a thousand times sexier than being the "Elderly Management Service." [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 07:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
22047 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22046 +++$+++ 22046 +++$+++ 2008-06-15 21:36:00 +++$+++ 1.213590960E09 +++$+++ I totally agree with you.  For the most part, it is an issue of tradition and public image.  Actually, I even consider rescue as a separate entity from fire and EMS.  While fire departments are usually responsible for performing rescue, there are several towns and cities in my area where rescue is provided by EMS or there is an entirely separate rescue squad.  My main issue with fire-based EMS is that, ultimately, fire is in charge of EMS - rather than them being equals within one organization.  The fire chief in charge of the department often has no EMS training, yet makes decisions and has total authority regarding EMS.  This puts patient care (protocols, selection of medical direction) in the hands of someone without training.  Unfortunately, the command structure used in the fire department on fire jobs does not apply to daily EMS operations, which has the potential for conflict over patient care.  Additionally, there are budget issues that usually favor the fire side over the EMS side.  I'm sure you're well aware of some of the issues across the country.  So I guess my point is that while fire departments may provide EMS and rescue, I still consider each to be its own entity.  Within an individual department, EMS may be a subordinate of fire; but in the grand scheme of things, they are still totally different entities.  -- +++$+++ :I totally agree with you.  For the most part, it is an issue of tradition and public image.  Actually, I even consider rescue as a separate entity from fire and EMS.  While fire departments are usually responsible for performing rescue, there are several towns and cities in my area where rescue is provided by EMS or there is an entirely separate rescue squad.  My main issue with fire-based EMS is that, ultimately, fire is in charge of EMS - rather than them being equals within one organization.  The fire chief in charge of the department often has no EMS training, yet makes decisions and has total authority regarding EMS.  This puts patient care (protocols, selection of medical direction) in the hands of someone without training.  Unfortunately, the command structure used in the fire department on fire jobs does not apply to daily EMS operations, which has the potential for conflict over patient care.  Additionally, there are budget issues that usually favor the fire side over the EMS side.  I'm sure you're well aware of some of the issues across the country.  So I guess my point is that while fire departments may provide EMS and rescue, I still consider each to be its own entity.  Within an individual department, EMS may be a subordinate of fire; but in the grand scheme of things, they are still totally different entities.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 21:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
22048 +++$+++ Jclemens +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22046 +++$+++ 22047 +++$+++ 2008-06-15 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.213592040E09 +++$+++ Eww, yuck.  I'm so glad I work for a department where every officer, company and chief, has to keep their EMT certification current, and where new volunteers are often put through EMT school before fire academy.  Tradition and esprit de corps should never trump giving the public, the taxpayers: our stakeholders, what they really need. It's tragic that in so many places it does.  +++$+++ ::Eww, yuck.  I'm so glad I work for a department where every officer, company and chief, has to keep their EMT certification current, and where new volunteers are often put through EMT school before fire academy.  Tradition and esprit de corps should never trump giving the public, the taxpayers: our stakeholders, what they really need. It's tragic that in so many places it does. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 21:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

284193 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284193 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-20 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.137773400E09 +++$+++ You must stop running [[User:Botryoidal]]. It isn't approved. You need to clarify what it is doing and why. I will block the bot if it doesn't stop operating. I will check back here for a response, since you may be blocked soon.-- +++$+++ You must stop running [[User:Botryoidal]]. It isn't approved. You need to clarify what it is doing and why. I will block the bot if it doesn't stop operating. I will check back here for a response, since you may be blocked soon.--[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] 08:10, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
284194 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284193 +++$+++ 284193 +++$+++ 2006-01-20 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.137774600E09 +++$+++ [[Botryoidal]] has been blocked for 24 hours and should not be used until it is authorised. If your user account has been blocked too I will unblock immediately - if you agree to follow the [[WP:BOTS]] policy.-- +++$+++ :[[Botryoidal]] has been blocked for 24 hours and should not be used until it is authorised. If your user account has been blocked too I will unblock immediately - if you agree to follow the [[WP:BOTS]] policy.--[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] 08:30, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
284195 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284193 +++$+++ 284194 +++$+++ 2006-01-20 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.137776040E09 +++$+++ A typo on my part means that you and Botryoidal are now unblocked. If Botryoidal doesn't make any more edits then I can't see any reason to clutter up the block log, you both can remain unblocked. -- +++$+++ ::A typo on my part means that you and Botryoidal are now unblocked. If Botryoidal doesn't make any more edits then I can't see any reason to clutter up the block log, you both can remain unblocked. --[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] 08:54, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

22050 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22050 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-17 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.213747080E09 +++$+++ thank you for the nerve root parameter.  I tried to add a physical exam parameter but I don't think it worked.  thank you also for the email - sorry I was cranky at 2 am.  +++$+++ thank you for the nerve root parameter.  I tried to add a physical exam parameter but I don't think it worked.  thank you also for the email - sorry I was cranky at 2 am. [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] ([[User talk:Tkjazzer|talk]]) 16:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
22051 +++$+++ Tkjazzer +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22050 +++$+++ 22050 +++$+++ 2008-06-17 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.213747920E09 +++$+++ scott I tried adding L2, L3, L4 to http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Quadriceps_muscle  but when I hit the edit button the nerve root parameter did not show up.  Why?  +++$+++ :scott I tried adding L2, L3, L4 to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadriceps_muscle  but when I hit the edit button the nerve root parameter did not show up.  Why? [[User:Tkjazzer|Tkjazzer]] ([[User talk:Tkjazzer|talk]]) 17:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
22052 +++$+++ Medicellis +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22050 +++$+++ 22050 +++$+++ 2008-06-30 23:19:00 +++$+++ 1.214893140E09 +++$+++ looks like we have alot in common, I look forward to working with you in the future.  The EMS Wiki projection looks great!  +++$+++ * looks like we have alot in common, I look forward to working with you in the future.  The EMS Wiki projection looks great! [[User:Medicellis|Medicellis]] ([[User talk:Medicellis|talk]]) 23:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

527963 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527963 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-28 11:28:00 +++$+++ 1.185647280E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | I award ^demon the ''[[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee|Mediation Committee]] Barnstar'' as an expression of thanks for all his hard work during his time as both an active mediator and as the Chair. Your service is greatly appreciated by all of us on the Committee, and I'm confident by mediation participants as well, as you picked up the Committee during a down-time and turned it into an energetic beast, making my job so much easier. So, thanks for all your efforts, and I feel proud to have served both under and following you. Cheers, ''' +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award ^demon the ''[[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee|Mediation Committee]] Barnstar'' as an expression of thanks for all his hard work during his time as both an active mediator and as the Chair. Your service is greatly appreciated by all of us on the Committee, and I'm confident by mediation participants as well, as you picked up the Committee during a down-time and turned it into an energetic beast, making my job so much easier. So, thanks for all your efforts, and I feel proud to have served both under and following you. Cheers, '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]]''' 11:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
527964 +++$+++ The Storm Surfer +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527963 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-28 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.185657480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the clarification.  I really wish more people would remember to provide sources for copyrighted images.  Also, thank you for updating the log so this question won't come up again in the future.  \u2014  +++$+++ ::Thanks for the clarification.  I really wish more people would remember to provide sources for copyrighted images.  Also, thank you for updating the log so this question won't come up again in the future.  — [[User:The Storm Surfer|The Storm Surfer]] 14:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

284196 +++$+++ Robchurch +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-08 19:44:00 +++$+++ 1.144550640E09 +++$+++ I'd like to get a bit more of the mess on the [[WP:BRFA]] page cleaned up. I placed some comments at [[Wikipedia:Bots\/Requests_for_approvals#Calm_down.2C_people.3B_let.27s_get_this_straightened_out_without_a_pile_on]]; could you review my summary and let me know if I've got it right? If so, we can approve a trial run or a bot flag, and get this episode out of the way.  +++$+++ I'd like to get a bit more of the mess on the [[WP:BRFA]] page cleaned up. I placed some comments at [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approvals#Calm_down.2C_people.3B_let.27s_get_this_straightened_out_without_a_pile_on]]; could you review my summary and let me know if I've got it right? If so, we can approve a trial run or a bot flag, and get this episode out of the way. [[User:Robchurch|Rob Church]] ([[User_talk:Robchurch|talk]]) 19:44, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
284197 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284196 +++$+++ 284196 +++$+++ 2006-04-09 02:08:00 +++$+++ 1.144573680E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 02:08, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

22053 +++$+++ Isaac +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22053 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-19 11:18:00 +++$+++ 1.216491480E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Isaac|Isaac]] ([[User talk:Isaac|talk]]) 11:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
22054 +++$+++ Medicellis +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22053 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-07-19 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.216499820E09 +++$+++ Isaac, again I would like to state that you have not been active in any dicussion related to WP:First Aid, the project was grossly inactive with no current edits.  Scott made a proposal trying to drawn in new blood and thus editors.  He was being [[bold]] as wikipedia ask you to do in making changes.  The change was made and there was not one negative word about the change until, 2-3 weeks post facto.  I'm not sure how much interest there is in a project if you check on it every month and make no concious effort to walk the project foward.  Scott made the assumption that most of the orginal editors were inactive or disinterested, as well as I did also.  [[User:Exit2DOS2000]] raised object 2 weeks after the name change and I added 300+ articles to the project.  If you would have taken 2 min's to read the rest of the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emergency medical services]] this was a major discussion and you would have noticed that the a concenus was reached and posted[[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine\/Task_forces#Emergency_medicine_and_EMS|here]]. Again I understand the frustration (but not the outward agression and angery) were are all civil educated adults.  All edits and changes were done in [[WP:GOODFAITH]], and I ask that you please keep your comments and tones to the same.   +++$+++ :: Isaac, again I would like to state that you have not been active in any dicussion related to WP:First Aid, the project was grossly inactive with no current edits.  Scott made a proposal trying to drawn in new blood and thus editors.  He was being [[bold]] as wikipedia ask you to do in making changes.  The change was made and there was not one negative word about the change until, 2-3 weeks post facto.  I'm not sure how much interest there is in a project if you check on it every month and make no concious effort to walk the project foward.  Scott made the assumption that most of the orginal editors were inactive or disinterested, as well as I did also.  [[User:Exit2DOS2000]] raised object 2 weeks after the name change and I added 300+ articles to the project.  If you would have taken 2 min's to read the rest of the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emergency medical services]] this was a major discussion and you would have noticed that the a concenus was reached and posted[[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine/Task_forces#Emergency_medicine_and_EMS|here]]. Again I understand the frustration (but not the outward agression and angery) were are all civil educated adults.  All edits and changes were done in [[WP:GOODFAITH]], and I ask that you please keep your comments and tones to the same.  [[User:Medicellis|Medicellis]] ([[User talk:Medicellis|talk]]) 13:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
22055 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22053 +++$+++ 22053 +++$+++ 2008-07-20 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.216544460E09 +++$+++ See my response at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject First aid]] (which you claim to [[WP:OWN|own]], yet you haven't looked at in over a month).  I have reverted all of the changes made to '''your''' project since it was converted to WP:EMS.  I won't make any further changes to or even look at anything related to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject First aid]] anymore.  -- +++$+++ : See my response at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject First aid]] (which you claim to [[WP:OWN|own]], yet you haven't looked at in over a month).  I have reverted all of the changes made to '''your''' project since it was converted to WP:EMS.  I won't make any further changes to or even look at anything related to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject First aid]] anymore.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 02:01, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
22056 +++$+++ Isaac +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22053 +++$+++ 22055 +++$+++ 2008-07-20 21:25:00 +++$+++ 1.216614300E09 +++$+++ You're right, I don't own it, and I shouldn't have stated it like that.  My wish was that you had messaged me and\/or the other members when the dialog was happening so i\/we didn't miss it.  Obviously the project has infrequent activity.  But personally I don't think your change will improve first aid articles any faster.  Not to say your project isn't helpful, but I think your project has a different direction than the first aid one.  Please don't leave if you're interested in the first aid articles, that's what the project is there for.   +++$+++ ::You're right, I don't own it, and I shouldn't have stated it like that.  My wish was that you had messaged me and/or the other members when the dialog was happening so i/we didn't miss it.  Obviously the project has infrequent activity.  But personally I don't think your change will improve first aid articles any faster.  Not to say your project isn't helpful, but I think your project has a different direction than the first aid one.  Please don't leave if you're interested in the first aid articles, that's what the project is there for.  [[User:Isaac|Isaac]] ([[User talk:Isaac|talk]]) 21:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
22057 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22053 +++$+++ 22056 +++$+++ 2008-07-21 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.216633620E09 +++$+++ I assumed that anyone active in a project would monitor what was going on at least once a week.  A pet peeve of mine is to make inactive projects more active - either by expanding the scope of the project or making it into a task force of a larger project.  The scope of my new project ([[Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine\/Emergency medicine and EMS task force]]) does encompass all of first aid, since first aid is practiced by EMS.  EMS provides first aid care, so all of first aid can be seen as a subset of EMS.  But I do recognize that not all first aid care is provided by EMS.  I figured I could make [[Wikipedia:WikiProject First aid]] more active by expanding its scope and drawing in new editors.  Since there was no opposition to my proposal after 2 weeks, I went ahead and made the change.  I still do not see the need for both [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine\/Emergency medicine and EMS task force]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject First aid]], but if you want to keep a project that will be a subset of another, so be it.  I am interested in first aid articles (more from the EM\/EMS than the lay person side), and I will still contribute to the articles.  But I won't interfere with you running [[Wikipedia:WikiProject First aid]]. -- +++$+++ :::I assumed that anyone active in a project would monitor what was going on at least once a week.  A pet peeve of mine is to make inactive projects more active - either by expanding the scope of the project or making it into a task force of a larger project.  The scope of my new project ([[Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Emergency medicine and EMS task force]]) does encompass all of first aid, since first aid is practiced by EMS.  EMS provides first aid care, so all of first aid can be seen as a subset of EMS.  But I do recognize that not all first aid care is provided by EMS.  I figured I could make [[Wikipedia:WikiProject First aid]] more active by expanding its scope and drawing in new editors.  Since there was no opposition to my proposal after 2 weeks, I went ahead and made the change.  I still do not see the need for both [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Emergency medicine and EMS task force]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject First aid]], but if you want to keep a project that will be a subset of another, so be it.  I am interested in first aid articles (more from the EM/EMS than the lay person side), and I will still contribute to the articles.  But I won't interfere with you running [[Wikipedia:WikiProject First aid]]. --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 02:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

284201 +++$+++ Mion +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284201 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-18 07:57:00 +++$+++ 1.137599820E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Mion|Mion]] 07:57, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
284202 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284201 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-18 11:26:00 +++$+++ 1.137612360E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 11:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

47367 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47367 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-18 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.219123560E09 +++$+++ Since you and I have rather different views of the affair, if we can agree which points can be omitted without tilting the balance either way, the result will probably be as equitable as such a confused mess allows. If you can find the time to comment, pleased do so at my talk page. --  +++$+++ Since you and I have rather different views of the affair, if we can agree which points can be omitted without tilting the balance either way, the result will probably be as equitable as such a confused mess allows. If you can find the time to comment, pleased do so at my talk page. -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 22:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
47368 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47367 +++$+++ 47367 +++$+++ 2008-08-19 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.219210620E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your comments at [[User:Philcha\/Sandbox#Staunton-Morphy_affair.2C_for_Howard_Staunton_-_v_2]] - considering how complex the issue is, I appreciate the promptness. --  +++$+++ :Thanks for your comments at [[User:Philcha/Sandbox#Staunton-Morphy_affair.2C_for_Howard_Staunton_-_v_2]] - considering how complex the issue is, I appreciate the promptness. -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 22:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
47369 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47367 +++$+++ 47367 +++$+++ 2008-08-19 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.219210620E09 +++$+++ We also need to look at the summary of the events of 1858 (sub-section Last para of \"... final stages of playing career ...\" at [[User:Philcha\/Sandbox#Staunton-Morphy_affair.2C_for_Howard_Staunton_-_v_2]]. It's too long, but removing items could tilt the balance either way. --  +++$+++ :We also need to look at the summary of the events of 1858 (sub-section Last para of "... final stages of playing career ..." at [[User:Philcha/Sandbox#Staunton-Morphy_affair.2C_for_Howard_Staunton_-_v_2]]. It's too long, but removing items could tilt the balance either way. -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 22:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
47370 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47367 +++$+++ 47369 +++$+++ 2008-08-20 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.219248720E09 +++$+++ Don't kill yourself over the summary of events. I'm reconciled to the prospect that the summary may have to be omitted - as [[The Staunton-Morphy controversy]] is fairly well developed, link phrases like \"complex, confusing and controversial sequence of events\" will give readers sufficient notice. --  +++$+++ ::Don't kill yourself over the summary of events. I'm reconciled to the prospect that the summary may have to be omitted - as [[The Staunton-Morphy controversy]] is fairly well developed, link phrases like "complex, confusing and controversial sequence of events" will give readers sufficient notice. -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 09:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
47371 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47367 +++$+++ 47369 +++$+++ 2008-08-20 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.219248720E09 +++$+++ Your Reinfeld quote at \"A bit of fun\" was a killer! --  +++$+++ ::Your Reinfeld quote at "A bit of fun" was a killer! -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 09:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
47372 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47367 +++$+++ 47369 +++$+++ 2008-08-25 10:05:00 +++$+++ 1.219683900E09 +++$+++ Given the tight timescale, I'll have to incorporate this draft into the main article if I get no comments from you or the reviewer in 24 hours. I'm sorry if this catches you at an inconvenient time or while you're unavailable. We can still make adjustments after the review is finished. --  +++$+++ ::Given the tight timescale, I'll have to incorporate this draft into the main article if I get no comments from you or the reviewer in 24 hours. I'm sorry if this catches you at an inconvenient time or while you're unavailable. We can still make adjustments after the review is finished. -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 10:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
47373 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47367 +++$+++ 47369 +++$+++ 2008-08-25 10:21:00 +++$+++ 1.219684860E09 +++$+++ PS: my biggest regret about the latest draft is losing the Hartston quote that you provided, as it's an honourable exception to the pattern of national bias. However Hartston falls into the category of \"popular\" (Diggle) and \"non-historian\" (Winter) writers, so I think it would be hard to justify including his comment when we're trying to slim everything down. --  +++$+++ ::PS: my biggest regret about the latest draft is losing the Hartston quote that you provided, as it's an honourable exception to the pattern of national bias. However Hartston falls into the category of "popular" (Diggle) and "non-historian" (Winter) writers, so I think it would be hard to justify including his comment when we're trying to slim everything down. -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 10:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
47374 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47367 +++$+++ 47373 +++$+++ 2008-08-25 17:47:00 +++$+++ 1.219711620E09 +++$+++ Take it easy, have a vacation, spend time with the family, whatever. It's a GA now, so we can sort things out at leisure. --  +++$+++ :::Take it easy, have a vacation, spend time with the family, whatever. It's a GA now, so we can sort things out at leisure. -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 17:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

546348 +++$+++  +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-09 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.276136100E09 +++$+++ Do you remember an editor named [[User:Sebastiano venturi]]?  He substantially edited the above article.  I cut it down a lot today.  If you're interested, there's a discussion on the talk page.  A potentially interesting, potentially redirectable, potentially COI-stuffed article.  The objecting editor is Sbharris though, not Dr. Venturi.   +++$+++ Do you remember an editor named [[User:Sebastiano venturi]]?  He substantially edited the above article.  I cut it down a lot today.  If you're interested, there's a discussion on the talk page.  A potentially interesting, potentially redirectable, potentially COI-stuffed article.  The objecting editor is Sbharris though, not Dr. Venturi.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 19:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
546349 +++$+++  +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546348 +++$+++ 546348 +++$+++ 2010-06-10 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.276232340E09 +++$+++ If you ever need a [[Sycophancy|sycophant]], any related form of abject worship, I offer my services.  You're a god Tim :)   +++$+++ :If you ever need a [[Sycophancy|sycophant]], any related form of abject worship, I offer my services.  You're a god Tim :)  [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 21:59, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

284206 +++$+++ Rusty2005 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284206 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-28 17:17:00 +++$+++ 1.146269820E09 +++$+++ Hi there, I'm having a bit of trouble with [[User:Ve3]], he keeps putting incorrect information on the [[mitrailleuse]] page and does not discuss any changes. I noticed you'd had some trouble with him over the M16 page, so I thought I should get in touch with you.  +++$+++ Hi there, I'm having a bit of trouble with [[User:Ve3]], he keeps putting incorrect information on the [[mitrailleuse]] page and does not discuss any changes. I noticed you'd had some trouble with him over the M16 page, so I thought I should get in touch with you. [[User:Rusty2005|Rusty2005]] 17:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
284207 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284206 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-29 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.146298860E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 01:21, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
284208 +++$+++ Rusty2005 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284206 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-29 02:26:00 +++$+++ 1.146302760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your advice there William, fortunately me and Ve3 have sorted out our disagreements and have compromised. Thanks though!  +++$+++ ::Thanks for your advice there William, fortunately me and Ve3 have sorted out our disagreements and have compromised. Thanks though! [[User:Rusty2005|Rusty2005]] 02:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

527965 +++$+++ Izzy259 +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527965 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-28 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.185650220E09 +++$+++ OK, these articles articles aren't up to full standards, BUT YOU'VE GONE TOO FAR TO DELETE THEM! They are highly needed and if there was a way, I would probably block you from destroying any more Robot Wars articles. I'm not the one to blame and tell off people on Wikipedia, but you should be ashamed.  +++$+++ OK, these articles articles aren't up to full standards, BUT YOU'VE GONE TOO FAR TO DELETE THEM! They are highly needed and if there was a way, I would probably block you from destroying any more Robot Wars articles. I'm not the one to blame and tell off people on Wikipedia, but you should be ashamed. [[User:Izzy259|Some Guy (Izzy259)]] 12:17, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
527966 +++$+++ DeadBot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527965 +++$+++ 527965 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.185700620E09 +++$+++ For the first two, they were deleted for being non-notable. Minor partipants, as well as Non-UK partipitants, can easily be mentioned on a main list or the main article. As for The Video Games, I cannot find an article by that name that was deleted. If you want to contest the deletion of an article, please go to [[WP:DRV|DRV]]. [[User:TheFearow|Matt\/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions\/TheFearow|(Contribs)]]  +++$+++ :For the first two, they were deleted for being non-notable. Minor partipants, as well as Non-UK partipitants, can easily be mentioned on a main list or the main article. As for The Video Games, I cannot find an article by that name that was deleted. If you want to contest the deletion of an article, please go to [[WP:DRV|DRV]]. [[User:TheFearow|Matt/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/TheFearow|(Contribs)]] [[User:DeadBot|(Bot)]]</small> 02:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

22064 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22064 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-11 19:27:00 +++$+++ 1.223778420E09 +++$+++ I also want to create something like a \"principles of dermatology\" article discussing the basics of skin, examination, and diagnosis.  Is that an appropriate article of dermatology?  If so, what specifically should I name the article?   +++$+++ I also want to create something like a "principles of dermatology" article discussing the basics of skin, examination, and diagnosis.  Is that an appropriate article of dermatology?  If so, what specifically should I name the article?  [[User:Kilbad|Kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 19:27, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
22065 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22064 +++$+++ 22064 +++$+++ 2008-10-11 20:46:00 +++$+++ 1.223783160E09 +++$+++ Within Wikipedia, there have been no articles on medicine called \"principles of...\", so I would try to mirror what is done for other medical specialties.  I think a good name for an article would be [[Dermatological examination]] or [[Skin examination]].  You can take a look at the articles in {{tl|Physical exam}} and {{cl|Physical examination}} to guide you for a skin exam article.  The basics of skin should probably be included in [[skin]], while diagnosis would be in [[dermatology]].  -- +++$+++ :Within Wikipedia, there have been no articles on medicine called "principles of...", so I would try to mirror what is done for other medical specialties.  I think a good name for an article would be [[Dermatological examination]] or [[Skin examination]].  You can take a look at the articles in {{tl|Physical exam}} and {{cl|Physical examination}} to guide you for a skin exam article.  The basics of skin should probably be included in [[skin]], while diagnosis would be in [[dermatology]].  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 20:46, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
22066 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22064 +++$+++ 22065 +++$+++ 2008-10-18 13:45:00 +++$+++ 1.224362700E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your reply.  Also, I have replied with a response to your questions regarding [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#How_to_create_subcategories_in_dermatology|proposed categories in dermatology]].   +++$+++ ::Thank you for your reply.  Also, I have replied with a response to your questions regarding [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#How_to_create_subcategories_in_dermatology|proposed categories in dermatology]].  [[User:Kilbad|Kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 13:45, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
22067 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22064 +++$+++ 22065 +++$+++ 2008-10-28 17:25:00 +++$+++ 1.225239900E09 +++$+++ Right now there are two main skin disease categories, {{cl|Cutaneous diseases}} and {{cl|Skin diseases}}, and both have some subcategories.  What do you think the best way to merge these two cat would be?  I would like to get everything consolidated under \"Cutaneous conditions\" before I start to further categorize.  What do you think?  +++$+++ ::Right now there are two main skin disease categories, {{cl|Cutaneous diseases}} and {{cl|Skin diseases}}, and both have some subcategories.  What do you think the best way to merge these two cat would be?  I would like to get everything consolidated under "Cutaneous conditions" before I start to further categorize.  What do you think? [[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 17:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
22068 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22064 +++$+++ 22067 +++$+++ 2008-11-05 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.225927140E09 +++$+++ I responded to your post at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine\/Dermatology_task_force\/Categorization]].  +++$+++ :::I responded to your post at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine/Dermatology_task_force/Categorization]]. [[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 15:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

546355 +++$+++ ATC +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546355 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-17 17:08:00 +++$+++ 1.276819680E09 +++$+++ People haven't called ABA, \"Lovaas method\" since the late 20th century, and it can be easily confused with the Applied behavior analysis article and is hard to find the article (Lovaas technique). Shouldn't the article just be renamed to the [[Applied Behavior Analysis]]? And the \"current\" Applied behavior analysis article seems redundant to the [[Behavior modification]] article. Shouldn't the behaivor modification and ABA article be merged? The early childhood intervention article could say: Applied behavior analysis (ABA, also known as Intensive behavior intervention, IBI, Early intensive behavioral intervention, or EIBI).... and to also read that this was implemented by Dr. [[O. Ivar Lovaas]]. (And in the history section it could describe the whole process with the aversive and behavior modification program, and [[B.F. Skinner]] and O. Ivar Lovaas which developed the Lovaas method.)  +++$+++ People haven't called ABA, "Lovaas method" since the late 20th century, and it can be easily confused with the Applied behavior analysis article and is hard to find the article (Lovaas technique). Shouldn't the article just be renamed to the [[Applied Behavior Analysis]]? And the "current" Applied behavior analysis article seems redundant to the [[Behavior modification]] article. Shouldn't the behaivor modification and ABA article be merged? The early childhood intervention article could say: Applied behavior analysis (ABA, also known as Intensive behavior intervention, IBI, Early intensive behavioral intervention, or EIBI).... and to also read that this was implemented by Dr. [[O. Ivar Lovaas]]. (And in the history section it could describe the whole process with the aversive and behavior modification program, and [[B.F. Skinner]] and O. Ivar Lovaas which developed the Lovaas method.) [[User:ATC|<span style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''ATC'''</span>]]<sup> '''.''' [[User talk:ATC|Talk]]</sup> 17:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
546356 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546355 +++$+++ 546355 +++$+++ 2010-06-17 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.276819920E09 +++$+++ Could you provide some context please, I have never edited this article and psychology isn't my area.  +++$+++ :Could you provide some context please, I have never edited this article and psychology isn't my area. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 17:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
546357 +++$+++  +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546355 +++$+++ 546356 +++$+++ 2010-06-17 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.276825260E09 +++$+++ They do need a cleanup, but I'd personally want to see some pretty clear sources distinguishing between them before I'd urge for a massive merge.  That's my humble opinion.  There's certainly sources, [http:\/\/books.google.ca\/books?id=gUlW1gA3yyAC&pg=PA11#v=onepage&q&f=false this one] reads very much like my understanding of Lovaas and his technique.   +++$+++ ::They do need a cleanup, but I'd personally want to see some pretty clear sources distinguishing between them before I'd urge for a massive merge.  That's my humble opinion.  There's certainly sources, [http://books.google.ca/books?id=gUlW1gA3yyAC&pg=PA11#v=onepage&q&f=false this one] reads very much like my understanding of Lovaas and his technique.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 18:41, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

22069 +++$+++ Cyclonenim +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22069 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-22 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.224714120E09 +++$+++ Hey {{BASEPAGENAME}}. {{User|Kilbad}} has asked me to ask around a few people to get their opinions on the current catagorisation tree proposed at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#How_to_create_subcategories_in_dermatology|this discussion]], as he seems rather eager to get going with the work but would like a few more opinions. Any chance you could have a quick look and post your thoughts? Cheers. \u2014''' +++$+++ Hey {{BASEPAGENAME}}. {{User|Kilbad}} has asked me to ask around a few people to get their opinions on the current catagorisation tree proposed at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#How_to_create_subcategories_in_dermatology|this discussion]], as he seems rather eager to get going with the work but would like a few more opinions. Any chance you could have a quick look and post your thoughts? Cheers. —'''[[User:Cyclonenim|Cyclonenim]]''' ([[User talk:Cyclonenim|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Cyclonenim|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Cyclonenim|email]]) 15:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
22070 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22069 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-10-23 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.224830760E09 +++$+++ Scott, thank you so much for you help with this derm cat discussion.  I have put the working cat outline at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine\/Dermatology_task_force\/Categorization]] for easy reference.  I also noticed that you have edited some categorization, and I thank you for that!  I am working, and have almost completed, a listing of essentially all skin diseases, and will try to have headers on that article that follow our current categorization scheme.  Again, thanks for your help as the entire categorization\/recategorization will take some time.  Also, two questions, (1) could you see the discussion page on the link I just provided, and tell me if there is any way to completely expand the current category tree on the right hand side of that page, and (2) can you help me rename\/move existing categories to the new names we have chosen (when applicable of course), like for example, \"Dermatological preparations\" to -> \"Cutaneous pharmacology\" ? Regardless, Thanks!  +++$+++ ::Scott, thank you so much for you help with this derm cat discussion.  I have put the working cat outline at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Dermatology_task_force/Categorization]] for easy reference.  I also noticed that you have edited some categorization, and I thank you for that!  I am working, and have almost completed, a listing of essentially all skin diseases, and will try to have headers on that article that follow our current categorization scheme.  Again, thanks for your help as the entire categorization/recategorization will take some time.  Also, two questions, (1) could you see the discussion page on the link I just provided, and tell me if there is any way to completely expand the current category tree on the right hand side of that page, and (2) can you help me rename/move existing categories to the new names we have chosen (when applicable of course), like for example, "Dermatological preparations" to -> "Cutaneous pharmacology" ? Regardless, Thanks! [[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 23:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
22071 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22069 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-11-15 00:49:00 +++$+++ 1.226738940E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help with categorization of derm articles.  +++$+++ ::::Thanks for your help with categorization of derm articles. [[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 00:49, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

546358 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546358 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-30 14:55:00 +++$+++ 1.277934900E09 +++$+++ Hey, Tim.  I'm bone tired (ahem) and won't have much time til August, but there is a problem with some tendentious editing at an Eubulides FA (Eubulides is gone, unfortunately, and Colin is on a Wikibreak because of another run-in with another editor).  I haven't been able to give this close attention.  Please see [http:\/\/anzhealthpolicy.com\/content\/4\/1\/25 this full-text journal article] and [[Talk:Water fluoridation#Armfield]] if you have any time to look in there and watchlist this article.  Similar issues are occurring at [[Quackwatch]] with this editor. Best regards,  +++$+++ Hey, Tim.  I'm bone tired (ahem) and won't have much time til August, but there is a problem with some tendentious editing at an Eubulides FA (Eubulides is gone, unfortunately, and Colin is on a Wikibreak because of another run-in with another editor).  I haven't been able to give this close attention.  Please see [http://anzhealthpolicy.com/content/4/1/25 this full-text journal article] and [[Talk:Water fluoridation#Armfield]] if you have any time to look in there and watchlist this article.  Similar issues are occurring at [[Quackwatch]] with this editor. Best regards, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 14:55, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
546359 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546358 +++$+++ 546358 +++$+++ 2010-06-30 23:15:00 +++$+++ 1.277964900E09 +++$+++ And I see WLU is going through similar (again) at [[Talk:Bioidentical hormone replacement therapy]]; it's going to be hard to keep out quackery without Colin and Eubulides.   +++$+++ : And I see WLU is going through similar (again) at [[Talk:Bioidentical hormone replacement therapy]]; it's going to be hard to keep out quackery without Colin and Eubulides.  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:15, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

284215 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284215 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-26 03:43:00 +++$+++ 1.140954180E09 +++$+++ A policy against most template-changing bots would follow from this logic.  +++$+++ A policy against most template-changing bots would follow from this logic. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 03:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
284216 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284215 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-26 03:57:00 +++$+++ 1.140955020E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 03:57, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
284217 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284215 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-26 04:03:00 +++$+++ 1.140955380E09 +++$+++ Then what you want is to stop the bots. Talking with Netoholic is always worth trying, although it may not work; then go to the village pump or [[WP:AN]]. TfDing the ''template'' is throwing the baby (however ugly) out with the bathwater. +++$+++ ::Then what you want is to stop the bots. Talking with Netoholic is always worth trying, although it may not work; then go to the village pump or [[WP:AN]]. TfDing the ''template'' is throwing the baby (however ugly) out with the bathwater.[[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 04:03, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
284218 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284215 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-26 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.140955800E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 04:10, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
284219 +++$+++ Pmanderson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284215 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-26 21:30:00 +++$+++ 1.141018200E09 +++$+++ Then I suppose your remedy is an RfC, followed by ArbCom. I will support, for what that's worth.  +++$+++ ::Then I suppose your remedy is an RfC, followed by ArbCom. I will support, for what that's worth. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 21:30, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

546360 +++$+++  +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546360 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-07-06 05:44:00 +++$+++ 1.278420240E09 +++$+++ I had another go at the page.  I'm really uncomfortable with a long list of conditions associated with a pseudoscientific concept, so I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mucoid_plaque&diff=prev&oldid=371977890 shortened] the section.  As I say in my edit summary, [[WP:MEDRS]] supports peer-reviewed journals for medical claims, and even though this is obvious nonsense with no founding in anatomy, physiology, digestion or common sense, I can live with a condensed version.  What do you think?   +++$+++ I had another go at the page.  I'm really uncomfortable with a long list of conditions associated with a pseudoscientific concept, so I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mucoid_plaque&diff=prev&oldid=371977890 shortened] the section.  As I say in my edit summary, [[WP:MEDRS]] supports peer-reviewed journals for medical claims, and even though this is obvious nonsense with no founding in anatomy, physiology, digestion or common sense, I can live with a condensed version.  What do you think?  [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 05:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
546361 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546360 +++$+++ 546360 +++$+++ 2010-07-07 02:53:00 +++$+++ 1.278496380E09 +++$+++ Looks good. The article does need to describe what these quacks say, if only so that people can recognise this nonsense when they come across it.  +++$+++ :Looks good. The article does need to describe what these quacks say, if only so that people can recognise this nonsense when they come across it. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 02:53, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
546362 +++$+++  +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546360 +++$+++ 546361 +++$+++ 2010-07-09 01:34:00 +++$+++ 1.278664440E09 +++$+++ Do you do commons stuff?  You might be interested in [http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Commons:Deletion_requests\/File:Em_flavavirus-HCV_samp1c.jpg this] - though I'm not sure if you deal with viruses.  Do you know someone who would be able to help?  I've already asked GrahamColm if you know him.   +++$+++ ::Do you do commons stuff?  You might be interested in [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Em_flavavirus-HCV_samp1c.jpg this] - though I'm not sure if you deal with viruses.  Do you know someone who would be able to help?  I've already asked GrahamColm if you know him.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 01:34, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
546363 +++$+++ Hannes Röst +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546360 +++$+++ 546360 +++$+++ 2010-07-15 14:35:00 +++$+++ 1.279229700E09 +++$+++ can you move [[User:Cellular Biochemistry II\/Course 2010\/MSP]] to [[Major sperm protein]]? The article is finished and the Wikipedia-one is very uninformative. Thanks a lot. -- +++$+++ * can you move [[User:Cellular Biochemistry II/Course 2010/MSP]] to [[Major sperm protein]]? The article is finished and the Wikipedia-one is very uninformative. Thanks a lot. --[[user:Hannes Röst|hroest]] 14:35, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
546364 +++$+++ Hannes Röst +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546360 +++$+++ 546360 +++$+++ 2010-07-15 14:39:00 +++$+++ 1.279229940E09 +++$+++ same for [[User:Cellular Biochemistry II\/Course 2010\/FGD1]] to [[FGD1 (gene)]]? thanks -- +++$+++ * same for [[User:Cellular Biochemistry II/Course 2010/FGD1]] to [[FGD1 (gene)]]? thanks --[[user:Hannes Röst|hroest]] 14:39, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

527967 +++$+++ Prod +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527967 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-25 00:54:00 +++$+++ 1.185350040E09 +++$+++ Can you please undelete the images mentioned [[Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Deleted_images_without_notice|here]] so that I can add some fair use rationale? --  +++$+++ Can you please undelete the images mentioned [[Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Deleted_images_without_notice|here]] so that I can add some fair use rationale? -- [[User:Prod|Prod-You]] 00:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
527968 +++$+++ Prod +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527967 +++$+++ 527967 +++$+++ 2007-07-28 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.185671160E09 +++$+++ I am reposting this as I did not hear anything back on this. --  +++$+++ :I am reposting this as I did not hear anything back on this. -- [[User:Prod|Prod-You]] 18:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
527969 +++$+++ Prod +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527967 +++$+++ 527968 +++$+++ 2007-07-29 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.185771300E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Fair use rationale added. --  +++$+++ ::Thanks. Fair use rationale added. -- [[User:Prod|Prod-You]] 21:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

284220 +++$+++ Netoholic +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-02-28 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.141168440E09 +++$+++ Did you really just nominate Further and Main article\/s for deletion?  Was it some form of relatiation for [[Template:Background]]?  --  +++$+++ Did you really just nominate Further and Main article/s for deletion?  Was it some form of relatiation for [[Template:Background]]?  -- [[User:Netoholic|Netoholic]] [[User talk:Netoholic|@]] 15:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
284221 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284220 +++$+++ 284220 +++$+++ 2006-02-28 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.141172220E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 16:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

22078 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22078 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-23 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.232772420E09 +++$+++ I remember the fact that you helped with the merger with [[pulmonology]] and pulmonologist articles. I did not know how much you were interested in pulmonology. I would like to know if you would be interested in joining the pulmonology task force ([[WP:LUNGS]]). We could always use more help! There are three members currently in this newly created task force including myself. Thanks for your time! -- +++$+++ I remember the fact that you helped with the merger with [[pulmonology]] and pulmonologist articles. I did not know how much you were interested in pulmonology. I would like to know if you would be interested in joining the pulmonology task force ([[WP:LUNGS]]). We could always use more help! There are three members currently in this newly created task force including myself. Thanks for your time! --[[User:Tyrol5|Tyrol5]] ([[User talk:Tyrol5|talk]]) 20:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
22079 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22078 +++$+++ 22078 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 06:25:00 +++$+++ 1.232979900E09 +++$+++ I'll gladly help out as I come across items to be done - I've been watching the task force page since it was created.  However, I've never actually listed myself as a participant of any project\/task force.  I prefer not to be formally listed.  -- +++$+++ :I'll gladly help out as I come across items to be done - I've been watching the task force page since it was created.  However, I've never actually listed myself as a participant of any project/task force.  I prefer not to be formally listed.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 06:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
22080 +++$+++ Tyrol5 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22078 +++$+++ 22079 +++$+++ 2009-01-26 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.233041100E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate that you will help out. I completely respect the fact that you would not like to be formally listed. Thank you very much, -- +++$+++ ::Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate that you will help out. I completely respect the fact that you would not like to be formally listed. Thank you very much, --[[User:Tyrol5|Tyrol5]] ([[User talk:Tyrol5|talk]]) 23:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

22081 +++$+++ WhatamIdoing +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22081 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-13 02:01:00 +++$+++ 1.236934860E09 +++$+++ In the big picture, this is my list of articles that is at risk for having an improperly capitalized page name (i.e., anything that's not low-importance [and therefore perhaps a biography] and has more than one capital letter in the title).  There's no rush.  Thanks,  +++$+++ In the big picture, this is my list of articles that is at risk for having an improperly capitalized page name (i.e., anything that's not low-importance [and therefore perhaps a biography] and has more than one capital letter in the title).  There's no rush.  Thanks, [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 02:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
22082 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22081 +++$+++ 22081 +++$+++ 2009-03-13 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.236939420E09 +++$+++ I just skimmed through the list, and agree with you.  I like the two-fold nature of the list.  I'll look more carefully at another time.  Are you going to keep track of what is downgraded, or just remove it from the list?  Let me know - I'll help out and follow whatever system you are using.  -- +++$+++ :I just skimmed through the list, and agree with you.  I like the two-fold nature of the list.  I'll look more carefully at another time.  Are you going to keep track of what is downgraded, or just remove it from the list?  Let me know - I'll help out and follow whatever system you are using.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 03:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
22083 +++$+++ WhatamIdoing +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22081 +++$+++ 22082 +++$+++ 2009-03-13 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.236944580E09 +++$+++ The bottom line is that I believe that you're neither an idiot nor a jerk, so whatever you do or don't do will probably be fine with me.   +++$+++ ::The bottom line is that I believe that you're neither an idiot nor a jerk, so whatever you do or don't do will probably be fine with me.  [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 04:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

284226 +++$+++ Tedernst +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-10 00:01:00 +++$+++ 1.134201660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for this quick action.  Feel free to removed the context tag, or I can do it.   +++$+++ Thanks for this quick action.  Feel free to removed the context tag, or I can do it.  [[User:Tedernst|Tedernst]] | [[User talk:Tedernst|talk]] 00:01, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
284227 +++$+++ WilliamAllenSimpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284226 +++$+++ 284226 +++$+++ 2005-12-10 00:08:00 +++$+++ 1.134202080E09 +++$+++ I happened to be posting on your Talk page, so I noticed it right away!  I'm looking for more information this very moment.  +++$+++ *I happened to be posting on your Talk page, so I noticed it right away!  I'm looking for more information this very moment. [[User:WilliamAllenSimpson|William Allen Simpson]] 00:08, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
284228 +++$+++ Tedernst +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284226 +++$+++ 284227 +++$+++ 2005-12-10 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.134208920E09 +++$+++ Need to be careful about copyright violations.  The Umich site is completely copyrighted, so while it can be used as a source, copy\/paste isn't going to cut it.  Either someone from Umich is going to find it and get mad or more likely, another wikipedia editor will find it and delete it to prevent scenario #1.  I edited the page to try to avoid that eventuality, but one never knows.   +++$+++ ** Need to be careful about copyright violations.  The Umich site is completely copyrighted, so while it can be used as a source, copy/paste isn't going to cut it.  Either someone from Umich is going to find it and get mad or more likely, another wikipedia editor will find it and delete it to prevent scenario #1.  I edited the page to try to avoid that eventuality, but one never knows.  [[User:Tedernst|Tedernst]] | [[User talk:Tedernst|talk]] 02:02, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

571659 +++$+++ RobNS +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-16 00:52:00 +++$+++ 1.181980320E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:RobNS|<b><font color="green">''Rob''</font>]][[User talk:RobNS|<font color="blue">''NS''</font></b>]] 00:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
571660 +++$+++ PeaceNT +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571659 +++$+++ 571659 +++$+++ 2007-06-16 01:46:00 +++$+++ 1.181983560E09 +++$+++ Happy birthday! Have a wonderful day :)  +++$+++ *Happy birthday! Have a wonderful day :) [[User talk:PeaceNT|'''Peacent''']] 01:46, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

22084 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22084 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-13 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.236992880E09 +++$+++ I have been working to create an organized categorization of pharmacology articles at [[WT:PHARM:CAT]], and, if avaliable, wanted to get some ''fresh'' feedback on that page?  +++$+++ I have been working to create an organized categorization of pharmacology articles at [[WT:PHARM:CAT]], and, if avaliable, wanted to get some ''fresh'' feedback on that page? [[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 18:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
22085 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22084 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-03-15 17:59:00 +++$+++ 1.237165140E09 +++$+++ I left a [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Pharmacology\/Categorization#More_comments|response to your comments]] and am ok moving forward with the categorization of pharmacology articles.  +++$+++ :*I left a [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Pharmacology/Categorization#More_comments|response to your comments]] and am ok moving forward with the categorization of pharmacology articles. [[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 17:59, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

284229 +++$+++ Tedernst +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284229 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-31 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.138759560E09 +++$+++ I don't understand why you need to constantly seek a rise out of me?  [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Rome_%28disambiguation%29&curid=60977&diff=37512804&oldid=35446579 This edit summary] is an example of what I'm talking about.  Why the need to put my name in an edit summary?  Why the need to use the word \"violation\"?  Why not make your change and drop a friendly note on my talk page.  As it is, I see this note and have no idea what you're talking about.  Unless you've recently changed [[MoS:DP]], I'm not aware of indented italics being used in the guideline.  And what purpose does it serve to stick your thumb in my eye?   +++$+++ I don't understand why you need to constantly seek a rise out of me?  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rome_%28disambiguation%29&curid=60977&diff=37512804&oldid=35446579 This edit summary] is an example of what I'm talking about.  Why the need to put my name in an edit summary?  Why the need to use the word "violation"?  Why not make your change and drop a friendly note on my talk page.  As it is, I see this note and have no idea what you're talking about.  Unless you've recently changed [[MoS:DP]], I'm not aware of indented italics being used in the guideline.  And what purpose does it serve to stick your thumb in my eye?  [[User:Tedernst|Tedernst]] | <small>[[User talk:Tedernst|talk]]</small> 18:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
284230 +++$+++ Tedernst +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284229 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-31 19:48:00 +++$+++ 1.138765680E09 +++$+++ I've never see that redirect guideline.  That's very helpful information and would've made an excellent edit summary!  <s>Also, I don't find [[WP:D#Primary topic]] at all.  Maybe you means something else?<\/s>  +++$+++ :: I've never see that redirect guideline.  That's very helpful information and would've made an excellent edit summary!  <s>Also, I don't find [[WP:D#Primary topic]] at all.  Maybe you means something else?</s> [[User:Tedernst|Tedernst]] | <small>[[User talk:Tedernst|talk]]</small> 19:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
284231 +++$+++ Tedernst +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284229 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-31 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.138765920E09 +++$+++ I don't know why there's such inconsistency between WP:D and MoS:DP, but here's an example where an editor familiar with one isn't necessarily familiar with both.  I thought MoS:DP would cover all I needed to know about the style of disambigation pages.  Obviously that's incorrect.  Please assume good faith and help me learn what I need to know instead of treating me like a vandal.  +++$+++ :: I don't know why there's such inconsistency between WP:D and MoS:DP, but here's an example where an editor familiar with one isn't necessarily familiar with both.  I thought MoS:DP would cover all I needed to know about the style of disambigation pages.  Obviously that's incorrect.  Please assume good faith and help me learn what I need to know instead of treating me like a vandal. [[User:Tedernst|Tedernst]] | <small>[[User talk:Tedernst|talk]]</small> 19:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
284232 +++$+++ Tedernst +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284229 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-31 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.138765980E09 +++$+++ Where are hatnotes mentioned in dab guidelines?  Until you recently started using them, I'd never seen them on dab pages?  +++$+++ :: Where are hatnotes mentioned in dab guidelines?  Until you recently started using them, I'd never seen them on dab pages? [[User:Tedernst|Tedernst]] | <small>[[User talk:Tedernst|talk]]</small> 19:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
284233 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284229 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-31 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.138763340E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 19:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

546374 +++$+++ A5b +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546374 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-13 18:49:00 +++$+++ 1.281750540E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=New_Delhi_metallo-beta-lactamase&diff=378728791&oldid=378721923] Gene will not change, yes. But there are researches about it. Also it can spread around the world, or go to other types of \"bugs\". ` +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_Delhi_metallo-beta-lactamase&diff=378728791&oldid=378721923] Gene will not change, yes. But there are researches about it. Also it can spread around the world, or go to other types of "bugs". `[[User:A5b|a5b]] ([[User talk:A5b|talk]]) 18:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
546375 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546374 +++$+++ 546374 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 18:57:00 +++$+++ 1.281751020E09 +++$+++ Yes, it is similar to [[MRSA]], which isn't a current event. There is a bit of a flap about this in the media at the moment, but this isn't very different from the multiple other families of carbapenemases that have been found over the past few years.  +++$+++ :Yes, it is similar to [[MRSA]], which isn't a current event. There is a bit of a flap about this in the media at the moment, but this isn't very different from the multiple other families of carbapenemases that have been found over the past few years. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 18:57, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
546376 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546374 +++$+++ 546375 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.281751260E09 +++$+++ Is this an indication that I should stop using imipenem to treat upper respiratory infections? ''' +++$+++ ::Is this an indication that I should stop using imipenem to treat upper respiratory infections? '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 19:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
546377 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546374 +++$+++ 546376 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 19:04:00 +++$+++ 1.281751440E09 +++$+++ Try phenol.  +++$+++ :::Try phenol. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 19:04, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
546378 +++$+++ MastCell +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546374 +++$+++ 546377 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.281752400E09 +++$+++ Actually, based on my readings on Wikipedia, a combination of garlic and vitamin C should get rid of NDM-1-expressing bacteria without all of the toxic side effects of conventional allopathic medicine. ''' +++$+++ ::::Actually, based on my readings on Wikipedia, a combination of garlic and vitamin C should get rid of NDM-1-expressing bacteria without all of the toxic side effects of conventional allopathic medicine. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 19:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
546379 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546374 +++$+++ 546378 +++$+++ 2010-08-13 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.281752520E09 +++$+++ High-dose garlic might also inhibit the contact-based spread of respiratory tract infections, so 2 bugs with one stone.  +++$+++ :::::High-dose garlic might also inhibit the contact-based spread of respiratory tract infections, so 2 bugs with one stone. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 19:22, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

22087 +++$+++ Kilbad +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22087 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-31 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.243755780E09 +++$+++ I was thinking, instead of having a photo for the dermatology icon (as it is hard to find a great derm photo that scales down nicely) could we have that space read something like \"DERM\" inside a colored box?  Similar to how the class and importance scale information is displayed? --- +++$+++ I was thinking, instead of having a photo for the dermatology icon (as it is hard to find a great derm photo that scales down nicely) could we have that space read something like "DERM" inside a colored box?  Similar to how the class and importance scale information is displayed? ---[[User:Kilbad|kilbad]] ([[User talk:Kilbad|talk]]) 00:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
22088 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22087 +++$+++ 22087 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.243827000E09 +++$+++ I don't think it is currently possible, as it is not supported by {{tl|WPBannerMeta}}.  You'd need to ask for someone to create the functionality at [[Template talk:WPBannerMeta]].  -- +++$+++ :I don't think it is currently possible, as it is not supported by {{tl|WPBannerMeta}}.  You'd need to ask for someone to create the functionality at [[Template talk:WPBannerMeta]].  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 20:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

284234 +++$+++ Tedernst +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284234 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-31 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.138765380E09 +++$+++ Also, the guidelines are not so clear that you can say I'm chaning 2+2=4 to 2+2=5.  The situation is totally different.  I'm editing in the way that I believe makes the encylopedia better.  If you disagree, please bring it up with me instead of throwing my name around all over the place.  You'll likely get much better results.  As it is, you're simply provoking anger.  If that's your goal, then your actions are very effective.   +++$+++ Also, the guidelines are not so clear that you can say I'm chaning 2+2=4 to 2+2=5.  The situation is totally different.  I'm editing in the way that I believe makes the encylopedia better.  If you disagree, please bring it up with me instead of throwing my name around all over the place.  You'll likely get much better results.  As it is, you're simply provoking anger.  If that's your goal, then your actions are very effective.  [[User:Tedernst|Tedernst]] | <small>[[User talk:Tedernst|talk]]</small> 19:43, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
284235 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284234 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-02-01 11:10:00 +++$+++ 1.138821000E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 11:10, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

22092 +++$+++ Wgungfu +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22092 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-21 16:52:00 +++$+++ 1.245628320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the help at [[Chan Shing]].  I'm thinking Wong's article could use major scalpeling as well - a ton of superfluous info and quotes from non-notable students and sources. About the only two that have notability are David Peterson and Gary Lam, who are both published. -- +++$+++ Thanks for the help at [[Chan Shing]].  I'm thinking Wong's article could use major scalpeling as well - a ton of superfluous info and quotes from non-notable students and sources. About the only two that have notability are David Peterson and Gary Lam, who are both published. --[[User:Wgungfu|Marty Goldberg]] ([[User talk:Wgungfu|talk]]) 16:52, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
22093 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22092 +++$+++ 22092 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.245666480E09 +++$+++ I'll keep an eye on [[Wong Shun Leung]], but it's a lot to tackle.  The article is probably too detailed and it's hard to read through.  -- +++$+++ :I'll keep an eye on [[Wong Shun Leung]], but it's a lot to tackle.  The article is probably too detailed and it's hard to read through.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 03:28, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

22094 +++$+++ Soap +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22094 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-08 17:33:00 +++$+++ 1.252456380E09 +++$+++ I just want to remind you that there is a page at [[anaesthesia]] that you should probably work into your pagemove plans.  Whether you want to make it the primary or a redirect to the spelling without an -a- is up to you. -- ''<B> +++$+++ I just want to remind you that there is a page at [[anaesthesia]] that you should probably work into your pagemove plans.  Whether you want to make it the primary or a redirect to the spelling without an -a- is up to you. -- ''<B>[[User:Soap|Soap]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:Soap|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|Contributions]]</sub> 17:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
22095 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22094 +++$+++ 22094 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 17:44:00 +++$+++ 1.252457040E09 +++$+++ The content from [[List of anaesthetic drugs]] (soon to become [[Anesthetic]]) was from [[Anesthesia]].  My purpose was to separate content about the drugs (-ic articles) from the field itself (-ia articles), since that is what is done for other medical fields.  Also, the content of the drug articles should be less prone to edit warring, so it might develop into a more stable article.  I chose \"anesthetic\" over \"anaesthesic\" because almost all of the current articles use that spelling (except for [[General anaesthesia]]).  I will have [[Anaesthetic]] redirect to [[Anesthetic]] once the move is complete.  What specific page move plans do you think are needed for [[anaesthesia]]?  -- +++$+++ :The content from [[List of anaesthetic drugs]] (soon to become [[Anesthetic]]) was from [[Anesthesia]].  My purpose was to separate content about the drugs (-ic articles) from the field itself (-ia articles), since that is what is done for other medical fields.  Also, the content of the drug articles should be less prone to edit warring, so it might develop into a more stable article.  I chose "anesthetic" over "anaesthesic" because almost all of the current articles use that spelling (except for [[General anaesthesia]]).  I will have [[Anaesthetic]] redirect to [[Anesthetic]] once the move is complete.  What specific page move plans do you think are needed for [[anaesthesia]]?  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 17:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
22096 +++$+++ Soap +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22094 +++$+++ 22095 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.252457700E09 +++$+++ [[Anesthesia]] isn't being changed, right?  So I would say [[anaesthesia]] shouldn't be either. -- ''<B> +++$+++ ::[[Anesthesia]] isn't being changed, right?  So I would say [[anaesthesia]] shouldn't be either. -- ''<B>[[User:Soap|Soap]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:Soap|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|Contributions]]</sub> 17:55, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
22097 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22094 +++$+++ 22096 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.252458600E09 +++$+++ I have no intentions to change [[Anesthesia]] at all (other than the split which I already performed).  [[Anaesthesia]] is just a redirect to [[Anesthesia]], which there is also no reason to change.  The only things remaining in my immediate plans are to move [[List of anaesthetic drugs]] to [[Anesthetic]], and to redirect [[Anaesthetic]] to [[Anesthetic]].  -- +++$+++ :::I have no intentions to change [[Anesthesia]] at all (other than the split which I already performed).  [[Anaesthesia]] is just a redirect to [[Anesthesia]], which there is also no reason to change.  The only things remaining in my immediate plans are to move [[List of anaesthetic drugs]] to [[Anesthetic]], and to redirect [[Anaesthetic]] to [[Anesthetic]].  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 18:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
22098 +++$+++ Soap +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22094 +++$+++ 22097 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.252463160E09 +++$+++ I think everything's all set now. -- ''<B> +++$+++ ::::I think everything's all set now. -- ''<B>[[User:Soap|Soap]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:Soap|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|Contributions]]</sub> 19:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
22099 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22094 +++$+++ 22098 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 19:53:00 +++$+++ 1.252464780E09 +++$+++ Everything looks good.  Thanks.  -- +++$+++ :::::Everything looks good.  Thanks.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] 19:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

284240 +++$+++ Tobias Conradi +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-21 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.135196640E09 +++$+++ Please stop your vandal-like deletion and misleading summary behavior.  +++$+++ Please stop your vandal-like deletion and misleading summary behavior. [[User:Tobias Conradi|Tobias Conradi]] [[User_talk:Tobias Conradi|(Talk)]] 12:24, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
284241 +++$+++ Golbez +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284240 +++$+++ 284240 +++$+++ 2005-12-22 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.135243500E09 +++$+++ Reverting to fix vandalism can be considered minor. Reverting over a content dispute should never be marked minor. Where this is mentioned, I don't know, but I'm pretty sure it is, somewhere. -- +++$+++ :Reverting to fix vandalism can be considered minor. Reverting over a content dispute should never be marked minor. Where this is mentioned, I don't know, but I'm pretty sure it is, somewhere. --[[User:Golbez|Golbez]] 01:25, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

284242 +++$+++ Karmafist +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284242 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-12-25 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.135510440E09 +++$+++ I'm going to be checking all the edits at [[Wikipedia:Request for comment\/Naming conventions (subnational entities)]] over the next few days. I'll let you know what I think hopefully by the end of next week.  +++$+++ I'm going to be checking all the edits at [[Wikipedia:Request for comment/Naming conventions (subnational entities)]] over the next few days. I'll let you know what I think hopefully by the end of next week. [[User:Karmafist|karmafist]] 03:34, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
284243 +++$+++ Karmafist +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284242 +++$+++ 284242 +++$+++ 2005-12-26 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.135601640E09 +++$+++ In the meantime, could you revise your proposed solution to be in regards to the policy itself rather than those who disagree with you? I've asked Conradi to be civil as well. That will be key in resolving this dispute.  +++$+++ : In the meantime, could you revise your proposed solution to be in regards to the policy itself rather than those who disagree with you? I've asked Conradi to be civil as well. That will be key in resolving this dispute. [[User:Karmafist|karmafist]] 04:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
284244 +++$+++ Karmafist +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284242 +++$+++ 284243 +++$+++ 2005-12-28 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.135825680E09 +++$+++ Hey, just letting you know that i've finalized my analysis at [[Wikipedia:Request for comment\/Naming conventions (subnational entities)]].  +++$+++ ::Hey, just letting you know that i've finalized my analysis at [[Wikipedia:Request for comment/Naming conventions (subnational entities)]]. [[User:Karmafist|karmafist]] 19:08, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

546389 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546389 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-24 00:23:00 +++$+++ 1.282634580E09 +++$+++ Hi Tim, [[:File:Western blotting 3.svg]] and [[:File:Western blotting 4.svg]] have both been deleted because the description pages didn't mention a source. The user who created them appears to have retired and so didn't have a chance to do anything about it. Judging by [[User talk:Bensaccount|the user's]] other contributions, I think that they might well be good diagrams. Could you take a look at them and restore them if they look like Bensaccount made them and then we can sort out the description page accordingly. Thanks  +++$+++ Hi Tim, [[:File:Western blotting 3.svg]] and [[:File:Western blotting 4.svg]] have both been deleted because the description pages didn't mention a source. The user who created them appears to have retired and so didn't have a chance to do anything about it. Judging by [[User talk:Bensaccount|the user's]] other contributions, I think that they might well be good diagrams. Could you take a look at them and restore them if they look like Bensaccount made them and then we can sort out the description page accordingly. Thanks [[User:Smartse|Smartse]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 00:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
546390 +++$+++ Smartse +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546389 +++$+++ 546389 +++$+++ 2010-08-24 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.282634760E09 +++$+++ By the way, do you think that [[:File:Translation.gif]] meets the [[Wikipedia:Featured picture criteria|featured picture criteria]]?  +++$+++ :By the way, do you think that [[:File:Translation.gif]] meets the [[Wikipedia:Featured picture criteria|featured picture criteria]]? [[User:Smartse|Smartse]] ([[User talk:Smartse|talk]]) 00:26, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

284246 +++$+++ Redwolf24 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284246 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-10 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.136887620E09 +++$+++ Hello, are you still interested in mediation? Please reply at my talk page.  +++$+++ Hello, are you still interested in mediation? Please reply at my talk page. [[User:Redwolf24|<font color="darkblue">Redwolf24</font>]] ([[User talk:Redwolf24|talk]]) 02:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
284247 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284246 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-10 02:49:00 +++$+++ 1.136890140E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 02:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

91065 +++$+++ Amatulic +++$+++ Singularity42 +++$+++ 91065 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 19:46:00 +++$+++ 1.312512360E09 +++$+++ I have soft-blocked [[User:Skyvalley Rovers FC]] and deleted the article but I am not convinced it was a hoax (the content of the article, yes, but not the existence of the team). I find several references for this team including on Facebook and YouTube videos of matches, as well as news items such as [http:\/\/www.roscommonpeople.ie\/itemdetail.asp?itemID=18291&menu=d18291 this one]. ~ +++$+++ I have soft-blocked [[User:Skyvalley Rovers FC]] and deleted the article but I am not convinced it was a hoax (the content of the article, yes, but not the existence of the team). I find several references for this team including on Facebook and YouTube videos of matches, as well as news items such as [http://www.roscommonpeople.ie/itemdetail.asp?itemID=18291&menu=d18291 this one]. ~[[User:Amatulic|Amatulić]] <small>([[User talk:Amatulic#top|talk]])</small> 19:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
91066 +++$+++ Amatulic +++$+++ Singularity42 +++$+++ 91065 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.312513380E09 +++$+++ Yes, I deleted the user's page for the same reasons. ~ +++$+++ ::Yes, I deleted the user's page for the same reasons. ~[[User:Amatulic|Amatulić]] <small>([[User talk:Amatulic#top|talk]])</small> 20:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

284248 +++$+++ Redwolf24 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-10 02:54:00 +++$+++ 1.136890440E09 +++$+++ Conradi isn't interested in mediation it appears, so the mediation won't happen as both parties must agree. As for your other questions, I'd really like to answer them all but I'm busy trying to reform RFM right now...  +++$+++ Conradi isn't interested in mediation it appears, so the mediation won't happen as both parties must agree. As for your other questions, I'd really like to answer them all but I'm busy trying to reform RFM right now... [[User:Redwolf24|<font color="darkblue">Redwolf24</font>]] ([[User talk:Redwolf24|talk]]) 02:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
284249 +++$+++ Essjay +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284248 +++$+++ 284248 +++$+++ 2006-01-10 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.136891040E09 +++$+++ I hope this helps, and if you have other questions, feel free to ask them of me here or on my talk page. \u2014   +++$+++ :I hope this helps, and if you have other questions, feel free to ask them of me here or on my talk page. —  [[User:Essjay|Essjay]]  ·  [[User_talk:Essjay| Talk]] 03:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
284250 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284248 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-01-10 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.136892000E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::--[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 03:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

527972 +++$+++ Argyriou +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527972 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-30 03:03:00 +++$+++ 1.185789780E09 +++$+++ A {{[[Template:prod|prod]]}} template has been added to the article [[Darkthrone]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion|criteria for inclusion]], and the deletion notice explains why (see also \"[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]\" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]).  You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}<\/nowiki><\/code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Darkthrone|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{tl|db-author}}. <span style=\"font-family:serif;font-size:120%\">''' +++$+++ A {{[[Template:prod|prod]]}} template has been added to the article [[Darkthrone]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion|criteria for inclusion]], and the deletion notice explains why (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]).  You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Darkthrone|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{tl|db-author}}. <span style="font-family:serif;font-size:120%">'''[[User:Argyriou|Argyriou]]''' [[User talk:Argyriou|(talk)]]</span> 03:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
527973 +++$+++ Daniel +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527972 +++$+++ 527972 +++$+++ 2007-07-30 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.185804780E09 +++$+++ Contested as [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Darkthrone&diff=147981339&oldid=147977015 'absured'] by {{user|Prolog}}, for the record. ''' +++$+++ :Contested as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Darkthrone&diff=147981339&oldid=147977015 'absured'] by {{user|Prolog}}, for the record. '''[[User:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel</span>]][[User talk:Daniel|<span style="color:#2E82F4">→♦</span>]]''' 07:13, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

284251 +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284251 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-04-19 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.145501880E09 +++$+++ I have warned Conradi about his continued use of the \"Willy\" diminuative when referring to you, when you have expressed repeatedly how insulting you find it.  If he continues to use the name, let me know, and I'll see what needs to happen next. -  +++$+++ I have warned Conradi about his continued use of the "Willy" diminuative when referring to you, when you have expressed repeatedly how insulting you find it.  If he continues to use the name, let me know, and I'll see what needs to happen next. - [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] 19:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
284252 +++$+++ Tobias Conradi +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284251 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.145545620E09 +++$+++ repeatedly? where? please provide diffs.  +++$+++ ::repeatedly? where? please provide diffs. [[User:Tobias Conradi|Tobias Conradi]] [[User_talk:Tobias Conradi|(Talk)]] 08:07, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
284253 +++$+++ TexasAndroid +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284251 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.145567880E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion\/Log\/2006_April_15&diff=48931271&oldid=48930704], [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion\/Log\/2006_April_11&diff=prev&oldid=48720617] ---- These are the two spots I can find easily of William expressing how insulting he finds your use of the name \"Willy\".  There are likely more, but I really don't feel the need to go digging at the moment.  -  +++$+++ ::: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_April_15&diff=48931271&oldid=48930704], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_April_11&diff=prev&oldid=48720617] ---- These are the two spots I can find easily of William expressing how insulting he finds your use of the name "Willy".  There are likely more, but I really don't feel the need to go digging at the moment.  - [[User:TexasAndroid|TexasAndroid]] 14:18, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
284254 +++$+++ Tobias Conradi +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284251 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-04-22 00:59:00 +++$+++ 1.145692740E09 +++$+++ Mmmm. At the time of your \"warning\" I have not had read the latter. Willam could have posted it to the moon page, I would have read it neither. Willam talks about denigration. I am not sure what Wilm is referring to and what he has in mind when speaking of denigration. Did I say something about him that was NOT true? Texy - you say there are likely more (spots) - how did you come to this conclusion??? Is this your way of [[WP:AGF]] ? Assume something just because it fits into ... mmh into what? Why did you say this, Texy? Why did you say there are likely more? IMO you are biased in your assumptions. In my eyes you are REALLY A BAD ADMIN at the moment. You should block yourself if you do such things again.  +++$+++ ::::Mmmm. At the time of your "warning" I have not had read the latter. Willam could have posted it to the moon page, I would have read it neither. Willam talks about denigration. I am not sure what Wilm is referring to and what he has in mind when speaking of denigration. Did I say something about him that was NOT true? Texy - you say there are likely more (spots) - how did you come to this conclusion??? Is this your way of [[WP:AGF]] ? Assume something just because it fits into ... mmh into what? Why did you say this, Texy? Why did you say there are likely more? IMO you are biased in your assumptions. In my eyes you are REALLY A BAD ADMIN at the moment. You should block yourself if you do such things again. [[User:Tobias Conradi|Tobias Conradi]] [[User_talk:Tobias Conradi|(Talk)]] 00:59, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
284255 +++$+++ John Reid +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284251 +++$+++ 284251 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 04:34:00 +++$+++ 1.145532840E09 +++$+++ William, this is not an isolated case. ''(See [[User_talk%3AJohn_Reid#Your_probably_false_claims_about_the_template_subnational_entities|this]].)''  +++$+++ : William, this is not an isolated case. ''(See [[User_talk%3AJohn_Reid#Your_probably_false_claims_about_the_template_subnational_entities|this]].)'' [[User:John Reid|John&nbsp;]][[User talk:John Reid|Reid]] 04:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
284256 +++$+++ Tobias Conradi +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284251 +++$+++ 284255 +++$+++ 2006-04-20 08:07:00 +++$+++ 1.145545620E09 +++$+++ Did I call you Jy? (shorten user name, add \"y\")  +++$+++ ::Did I call you Jy? (shorten user name, add "y") [[User:Tobias Conradi|Tobias Conradi]] [[User_talk:Tobias Conradi|(Talk)]] 08:07, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
284257 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284251 +++$+++ 284251 +++$+++ 2005-12-20 00:46:00 +++$+++ 1.135068360E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I was the 4th poster, and just followed the previous comments in the section.  I'll go remove it.  +++$+++ :Sorry, I was the 4th poster, and just followed the previous comments in the section.  I'll go remove it. [[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 00:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
284258 +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ William Allen Simpson +++$+++ 284251 +++$+++ 284251 +++$+++ 2006-01-02 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.136228100E09 +++$+++ Thank you! -- +++$+++ :Thank you! --[[User:William Allen Simpson|William Allen Simpson]] 10:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

22109 +++$+++ Alex at kms +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22109 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-03 13:19:00 +++$+++ 1.291411140E09 +++$+++ i was trying to create a map but it was slow incoming, so thanks for the template!-- +++$+++ i was trying to create a map but it was slow incoming, so thanks for the template!--[[User:Alex at kms|Alex at kms]] ([[User talk:Alex at kms|talk]]) 13:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
22110 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22109 +++$+++ 22109 +++$+++ 2010-12-04 01:47:00 +++$+++ 1.291456020E09 +++$+++ No problem!  -- +++$+++ :No problem!  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] ([[User talk:Scottalter#top|talk]]) 01:47, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

546399 +++$+++ Autonova +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546399 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-16 10:43:00 +++$+++ 1.284658980E09 +++$+++ Just thought I'd notify you, the principle hard working editor for [[Metabolism]], that I've put the article forward for Today's Featured Article for a non-specific date. See [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article\/requests#Metabolism]  :)   +++$+++ Just thought I'd notify you, the principle hard working editor for [[Metabolism]], that I've put the article forward for Today's Featured Article for a non-specific date. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article/requests#Metabolism]  :)  [[User:Autonova|Autonova]] ([[User talk:Autonova|talk]]) 10:43, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
546400 +++$+++ Autonova +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546399 +++$+++ 546399 +++$+++ 2010-09-18 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.284861960E09 +++$+++ Turns out it was rejected purely due to 'uncited paragraphs'. Fix this problem and it will be front page material- it's a core article and was promoted over two years ago after all.  +++$+++ :Turns out it was rejected purely due to 'uncited paragraphs'. Fix this problem and it will be front page material- it's a core article and was promoted over two years ago after all. [[User:Autonova|Autonova]] ([[User talk:Autonova|talk]]) 19:06, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

584989 +++$+++ Andrevan +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584989 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-26 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.204082760E09 +++$+++ Is there any reason to do that other than not needing the flag? ''' +++$+++ Is there any reason to do that other than not needing the flag? '''[[User:Andrevan|Andre]]''' ([[User_talk:Andrevan|talk]]) 19:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
584990 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584989 +++$+++ 584989 +++$+++ 2008-02-26 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.204083000E09 +++$+++ Well, you don't have to if you don't want to, but it prevents [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=Maxim&page= other users] from removing the right instead.  +++$+++ :Well, you don't have to if you don't want to, but it prevents [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=Maxim&page= other users] from removing the right instead. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

22113 +++$+++ Jmh649 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22113 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-26 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.303855560E09 +++$+++ Not sure why the redirect was removed from [[Talk:Buerger's disease]] -- +++$+++ Not sure why the redirect was removed from [[Talk:Buerger's disease]] --[[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 15:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
22114 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22113 +++$+++ 22113 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.303855740E09 +++$+++ The redirect should not be on the talk page - just in the main article space.  When a project chooses to tag redirect pages, the talk page always just has the project banner and the main article space is the redirect.  There are only 2 articles in WPMED that improperly have both a redirect and project banner on the talk page.  I'm trying to fix these.  See [[:Category:Redirect-Class medicine articles]] for all the other articles that are redirects without having talk page redirects.  -- +++$+++ :The redirect should not be on the talk page - just in the main article space.  When a project chooses to tag redirect pages, the talk page always just has the project banner and the main article space is the redirect.  There are only 2 articles in WPMED that improperly have both a redirect and project banner on the talk page.  I'm trying to fix these.  See [[:Category:Redirect-Class medicine articles]] for all the other articles that are redirects without having talk page redirects.  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] ([[User talk:Scottalter#top|talk]]) 15:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
22115 +++$+++ Jmh649 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22113 +++$+++ 22114 +++$+++ 2011-04-26 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.303855920E09 +++$+++ Okay thanks.  +++$+++ ::Okay thanks. [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 15:12, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

284260 +++$+++ Geneisner +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284260 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-04 06:26:00 +++$+++ 1.159968360E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Geneisner|Geneisner]] 06:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
284261 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284260 +++$+++ 284260 +++$+++ 2006-10-04 06:36:00 +++$+++ 1.159968960E09 +++$+++ Thanks - I think it's shaping up now too, and things are in better proportion.  (The prominence of hat AFTRA note was bothering me!)  +++$+++ : Thanks - I think it's shaping up now too, and things are in better proportion.  (The prominence of hat AFTRA note was bothering me!) [[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] 06:36, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
284262 +++$+++ Veinor +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284260 +++$+++ 284260 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.163681640E09 +++$+++ It's a myspace fansite, two things that [[WP:EL]] forbids.  +++$+++ :It's a myspace fansite, two things that [[WP:EL]] forbids. [[User:Veinor|Veinor]] ([[User_talk:Veinor|ヴエノル<sup>(talk)</sup>]]) 04:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

527974 +++$+++ Andeggs +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527974 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-30 08:01:00 +++$+++ 1.185807660E09 +++$+++ Um what's CSD#14 which was cited as criteria to delete this image? The Terra Nova sailed from 1910-1913 so the picture is in the public domain. Thanks  +++$+++ Um what's CSD#14 which was cited as criteria to delete this image? The Terra Nova sailed from 1910-1913 so the picture is in the public domain. Thanks [[User:Andeggs|Andeggs]] 08:01, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
527975 +++$+++ DeadBot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527974 +++$+++ 527974 +++$+++ 2007-07-30 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.185808440E09 +++$+++ I am assuming you mean CSD I4: You want to read the [[WP:CSD|CSD]] page, you are looking at criteria Image 4. In this case, it says: Lack of licensing information. Images in category \"Images with unknown source\", \"Images with unknown copyright status\", or \"Images with no copyright tag\" that have been in the category for more than seven days, and which still lack the necessary information, regardless of when uploaded. Note, users sometimes specify their source in the upload summary, so be sure to check the circumstances of the image. If you know the source of the image, we can undelete the image, and you can provide the source. Thanks! [[User:TheFearow|Matt\/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions\/TheFearow|(Contribs)]]  +++$+++ :I am assuming you mean CSD I4: You want to read the [[WP:CSD|CSD]] page, you are looking at criteria Image 4. In this case, it says: Lack of licensing information. Images in category "Images with unknown source", "Images with unknown copyright status", or "Images with no copyright tag" that have been in the category for more than seven days, and which still lack the necessary information, regardless of when uploaded. Note, users sometimes specify their source in the upload summary, so be sure to check the circumstances of the image. If you know the source of the image, we can undelete the image, and you can provide the source. Thanks! [[User:TheFearow|Matt/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/TheFearow|(Contribs)]] [[User:DeadBot|(Bot)]]</small> 08:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

525281 +++$+++ Ciar +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525281 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-14 18:05:00 +++$+++ 1.176599100E09 +++$+++ |I, [[User:Ciar|Ciar]], share this tasty cookie from '''''[[User:Serephine|Serephine]]''''' with [[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] for diligent work in putting navigation templates on articles within the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Molecular_and_Cellular_Biology|Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject]]. I couldn't get around MCB so fast without them!!  +++$+++ |I, [[User:Ciar|Ciar]], share this tasty cookie from '''''[[User:Serephine|Serephine]]''''' with [[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] for diligent work in putting navigation templates on articles within the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Molecular_and_Cellular_Biology|Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject]]. I couldn't get around MCB so fast without them!! [[User:Ciar|Ciar]] 18:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
525282 +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ Arcadian +++$+++ 525281 +++$+++ 525281 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 19:36:00 +++$+++ 1.176604560E09 +++$+++ Munch munch - thanks! And I appreciate all the helpful edits you've made to the immunology articles lately. -- +++$+++ :Munch munch - thanks! And I appreciate all the helpful edits you've made to the immunology articles lately. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] 19:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

22119 +++$+++ WhatamIdoing +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22119 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-16 16:42:00 +++$+++ 1.308267720E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;\" | For assessing some 250 articles for WPMED during the last few weeks.  Emptying out the unassessed categories again is an achievement.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For assessing some 250 articles for WPMED during the last few weeks.  Emptying out the unassessed categories again is an achievement. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 16:42, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
22120 +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ Scottalter +++$+++ 22119 +++$+++ 22119 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 01:09:00 +++$+++ 1.308298140E09 +++$+++ Thanks for noticing...but what you didn't mention is that [[:Category:Unknown-importance medicine articles]] is also empty!  Compare the WPMED stats from [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:WP_1.0_bot\/Tables\/Project\/Medicine&direction=next&oldid=419228635 20 March 2011] and [[User:WP 1.0 bot\/Tables\/Project\/Medicine|today]].  -- +++$+++ :Thanks for noticing...but what you didn't mention is that [[:Category:Unknown-importance medicine articles]] is also empty!  Compare the WPMED stats from [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:WP_1.0_bot/Tables/Project/Medicine&direction=next&oldid=419228635 20 March 2011] and [[User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/Project/Medicine|today]].  --[[User:Scottalter|Scott Alter]] ([[User talk:Scottalter#top|talk]]) 01:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

284264 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284264 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-16 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.163682240E09 +++$+++ Hey, cool it - I'd like an admin to come in here please - I'm asking for this to be discussed, and this editor is just ripping off an item (not a very important one, by the way) that has been standing on the page for a while.   +++$+++ Hey, cool it - I'd like an admin to come in here please - I'm asking for this to be discussed, and this editor is just ripping off an item (not a very important one, by the way) that has been standing on the page for a while.  [[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] 05:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
284265 +++$+++ BirgitteSB +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284264 +++$+++ 284264 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.163683020E09 +++$+++ If you want an admin opinion, you should probably post at the [[WP:AN|Aministrator's noticeboard]].  {{tl|helpme}} doesn't bring in  an admin.  Other options you could explore are filing an [[WP:RFC]] and further steps in [[WP:DR|Dispute resolution]].  Honestly however that external link does not belong, and I don't think any admin or RFC will give you a more favorable opinion. -- +++$+++ :If you want an admin opinion, you should probably post at the [[WP:AN|Aministrator's noticeboard]].  {{tl|helpme}} doesn't bring in  an admin.  Other options you could explore are filing an [[WP:RFC]] and further steps in [[WP:DR|Dispute resolution]].  Honestly however that external link does not belong, and I don't think any admin or RFC will give you a more favorable opinion. --[[User:BirgitteSB|<font color="#f4a460 ">Birgitte§β</font>]] ʈ [[User talk:BirgitteSB|<small><font color="#778899">Talk</font></small>]] 05:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
284266 +++$+++ BirgitteSB +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284264 +++$+++ 284265 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.163685540E09 +++$+++ You are welcome.  Feel free to ask me if you need any other dorections around here.  It can be very confusing about where is the right place for answers.  Alot of the people doing cleanup work, like removing improper links, work off long lists and tend to get impersonal as they continully leave the same messages again and again.  It is really hard to stay fresh and not get short with people when continually getting negative reactions for doing unexciting but very necessary grunt work.  I am sorry that you had a bad experience today.  I've personally been on both ends of these things in my time here so I am a little more philosophical about it now.  It is generally best to assume the cleanup person knows something you don't and ask about the policy backing up what they did, which in this case is [[WP:EL]].  I understand that the warning about blocking you while answering your question doesn't really help things, but I always try cut people doing that kind of work extra slack. -- +++$+++ ::You are welcome.  Feel free to ask me if you need any other dorections around here.  It can be very confusing about where is the right place for answers.  Alot of the people doing cleanup work, like removing improper links, work off long lists and tend to get impersonal as they continully leave the same messages again and again.  It is really hard to stay fresh and not get short with people when continually getting negative reactions for doing unexciting but very necessary grunt work.  I am sorry that you had a bad experience today.  I've personally been on both ends of these things in my time here so I am a little more philosophical about it now.  It is generally best to assume the cleanup person knows something you don't and ask about the policy backing up what they did, which in this case is [[WP:EL]].  I understand that the warning about blocking you while answering your question doesn't really help things, but I always try cut people doing that kind of work extra slack. --[[User:BirgitteSB|<font color="#f4a460 ">Birgitte§β</font>]] ʈ [[User talk:BirgitteSB|<small><font color="#778899">Talk</font></small>]] 05:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
284267 +++$+++ Veinor +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284264 +++$+++ 284264 +++$+++ 2006-11-16 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.163686800E09 +++$+++ OK, let me see how clearly I can explain this. At Wikipedia, fansites and links to Myspace sites are generally not allowed. There are exceptions to the fansite rule that this could possibly fall under, given its popularity, but the MySpace rule still covers it. It states that links to social networking sites (which MySpace is) are not allowed unless \"mandated by the article itself.\" Basically, they're only allowed if they need to be mentioned specifically (e.g., for criticism). Therefore, the link was viewed as inappropriate. I apologize if i came off as impersonal; after a while, you just start to run on autopilot when you're cleaning up articles.  +++$+++ :OK, let me see how clearly I can explain this. At Wikipedia, fansites and links to Myspace sites are generally not allowed. There are exceptions to the fansite rule that this could possibly fall under, given its popularity, but the MySpace rule still covers it. It states that links to social networking sites (which MySpace is) are not allowed unless "mandated by the article itself." Basically, they're only allowed if they need to be mentioned specifically (e.g., for criticism). Therefore, the link was viewed as inappropriate. I apologize if i came off as impersonal; after a while, you just start to run on autopilot when you're cleaning up articles. [[User:Veinor|Veinor]] ([[User_talk:Veinor|ヴエノル<sup>(talk)</sup>]]) 06:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

22121 +++$+++ Lianachan +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22121 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-09 11:42:00 +++$+++ 1.213036920E09 +++$+++ Where has the article on the unreleased Prince & the Revolution album ''Dream Factory'' gone?  All links that ''used'' to go there now go to the page you moved without, as far as I know, discussion!  +++$+++ Where has the article on the unreleased Prince & the Revolution album ''Dream Factory'' gone?  All links that ''used'' to go there now go to the page you moved without, as far as I know, discussion! [[User:Lianachan|Lianachan]] ([[User talk:Lianachan|talk]]) 11:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
22122 +++$+++ Lianachan +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22121 +++$+++ 22121 +++$+++ 2008-06-09 21:21:00 +++$+++ 1.213071660E09 +++$+++ Yes, I am absolutely certain that there was a page about the unreleased Prince album ''Dream Factory'', which was linked to from several Prince pages (see ''Crystal Ball'' [[Unreleased_Prince_projects#Dream_Factory|and the page of unreleased Prince projects]] for example).  I had edited it slightly in the past myself, and had it on my watchlist - which is why I noticed the move.  +++$+++ :Yes, I am absolutely certain that there was a page about the unreleased Prince album ''Dream Factory'', which was linked to from several Prince pages (see ''Crystal Ball'' [[Unreleased_Prince_projects#Dream_Factory|and the page of unreleased Prince projects]] for example).  I had edited it slightly in the past myself, and had it on my watchlist - which is why I noticed the move. [[User:Lianachan|Lianachan]] ([[User talk:Lianachan|talk]]) 21:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

546410 +++$+++ Boghog +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546410 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-09 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.294608660E09 +++$+++ I hope that you can drop us a short note.  I and I am sure others would love to hear from you.  Wishing you the best.   +++$+++ I hope that you can drop us a short note.  I and I am sure others would love to hear from you.  Wishing you the best.  [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 13:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
546411 +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546410 +++$+++ 546410 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 17:55:00 +++$+++ 1.295056500E09 +++$+++ Hey there, thanks for the note. I'm still around, but with a student to supervise and a grant to write, so I have very little free time at the moment. I hope to return to Wiki at some point in the future.  +++$+++ :Hey there, thanks for the note. I'm still around, but with a student to supervise and a grant to write, so I have very little free time at the moment. I hope to return to Wiki at some point in the future. [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers#top|talk]]) 17:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
546412 +++$+++ Boghog +++$+++ TimVickers +++$+++ 546410 +++$+++ 546411 +++$+++ 2011-01-14 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.295068020E09 +++$+++ Great!  I am relieved to hear from you and good luck on your grant proposal.  Cheers.   +++$+++ :: Great!  I am relieved to hear from you and good luck on your grant proposal.  Cheers.  [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog|talk]]) 21:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

284269 +++$+++ Revmoran +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-21 19:07:00 +++$+++ 1.161482820E09 +++$+++ Great job on the Murray the K article!  I didn't know his son but we went to the same high school, [[McBurney School]], and I did get to meet Murry the K once when he visited the lunchroom. That would have been pre-Beatles, say 1962, but he was already a big name in New York, and I especially remember the collecctions of oldies - meaning 1950's hits - he had on LP records - great at dances.   +++$+++ Great job on the Murray the K article!  I didn't know his son but we went to the same high school, [[McBurney School]], and I did get to meet Murry the K once when he visited the lunchroom. That would have been pre-Beatles, say 1962, but he was already a big name in New York, and I especially remember the collecctions of oldies - meaning 1950's hits - he had on LP records - great at dances.  [[User:Revmoran|Revmoran]] 19:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
284270 +++$+++ Revmoran +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284269 +++$+++ 284269 +++$+++ 2006-10-28 17:18:00 +++$+++ 1.162081080E09 +++$+++ I believe his name was Neil Kaufman - he was several years younger and I only really knew he was a student because of the time his father came to school - which was quite an event.  +++$+++ *I believe his name was Neil Kaufman - he was several years younger and I only really knew he was a student because of the time his father came to school - which was quite an event. [[User:Revmoran|Revmoran]] 17:18, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

527976 +++$+++ Naive cynic +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527976 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-30 09:33:00 +++$+++ 1.185813180E09 +++$+++ You seem to have deleted the [[List of city nicknames]] article in violation of the deletion policy. Contrary to your claim, the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of city nicknames|deletion discussion]] didn't result in consensus to delete the article. Please restore it. \xb7  +++$+++ You seem to have deleted the [[List of city nicknames]] article in violation of the deletion policy. Contrary to your claim, the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of city nicknames|deletion discussion]] didn't result in consensus to delete the article. Please restore it. · [[User:Naive cynic|Naive]] [[User talk:Naive cynic|cynic]] · 09:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
527977 +++$+++ DeadBot +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527976 +++$+++ 527976 +++$+++ 2007-07-30 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.185815280E09 +++$+++ The article was deleted at a second AfD nomination ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/List of city nicknames (2nd nomination)]]). The result on that nomination was delete. If you want to contest the deletion, please see [[WP:DRV|deletion review]]. [[User:TheFearow|Matt\/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions\/TheFearow|(Contribs)]]  +++$+++ :The article was deleted at a second AfD nomination ([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of city nicknames (2nd nomination)]]). The result on that nomination was delete. If you want to contest the deletion, please see [[WP:DRV|deletion review]]. [[User:TheFearow|Matt/TheFearow]] <small>[[User_Talk:TheFearow|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/TheFearow|(Contribs)]] [[User:DeadBot|(Bot)]]</small> 10:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
527978 +++$+++ Naive cynic +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527976 +++$+++ 527977 +++$+++ 2007-07-30 11:02:00 +++$+++ 1.185818520E09 +++$+++ Ah, I haven't noticed it has been nominated again. Please ignore my request. \xb7  +++$+++ :: Ah, I haven't noticed it has been nominated again. Please ignore my request. · [[User:Naive cynic|Naive]] [[User talk:Naive cynic|cynic]] · 11:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
527979 +++$+++ Tony Sidaway +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 527976 +++$+++ 527976 +++$+++ 2007-07-30 15:26:00 +++$+++ 1.185834360E09 +++$+++ [[:Image:Voyagercrew.jpg]]: this is not replaceable on [[Star Trek: Voyager]]. The program is no longer in production and, in any case, I think it unlikely that there would be free images illustrating the cast in that way.  Use on [[Starfleet uniforms]] is debatable but it doesn't make any difference to the deletion case for the image. -- +++$+++ * [[:Image:Voyagercrew.jpg]]: this is not replaceable on [[Star Trek: Voyager]]. The program is no longer in production and, in any case, I think it unlikely that there would be free images illustrating the cast in that way.  Use on [[Starfleet uniforms]] is debatable but it doesn't make any difference to the deletion case for the image. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 15:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

284274 +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284274 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-26 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.161888840E09 +++$+++ From what I can remember you had put <nowiki>{{subst:promophoto}}<\/nowiki> instead of <nowiki>{{promophoto}}<\/nowiki> which had the effect of copying the entire template including the bits that should be included (wrapped in <nowiki><noinclude> <\/noinclude><\/nowiki>) in the image page. The upshot of all this was that the images were included in a number of categories that they don't belong in i.e. \"Unfree image templates\". If you have a question about a specific image, please drop a note at my [[User talk:Megapixie|User talk page]].  +++$+++ From what I can remember you had put <nowiki>{{subst:promophoto}}</nowiki> instead of <nowiki>{{promophoto}}</nowiki> which had the effect of copying the entire template including the bits that should be included (wrapped in <nowiki><noinclude> </noinclude></nowiki>) in the image page. The upshot of all this was that the images were included in a number of categories that they don't belong in i.e. "Unfree image templates". If you have a question about a specific image, please drop a note at my [[User talk:Megapixie|User talk page]]. [[User:Megapixie|Megapixie]] 11:54, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
284275 +++$+++ Megapixie +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284274 +++$+++ 284274 +++$+++ 2006-10-26 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.161926820E09 +++$+++ No problem - I've been here over a year and I still come across things that are confusing...  +++$+++ :No problem - I've been here over a year and I still come across things that are confusing... [[User:Megapixie|Megapixie]] 22:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

22131 +++$+++ Gary King +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22131 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-12 04:33:00 +++$+++ 1.231763580E09 +++$+++ I don't have access to any old ''Nintendo Power'' issues. Would you happen to have any? <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ I don't have access to any old ''Nintendo Power'' issues. Would you happen to have any? <font face="Verdana">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02b">Gary&nbsp;<b>King</b></font>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 04:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
22132 +++$+++ Gary King +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22131 +++$+++ 22131 +++$+++ 2009-01-12 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.231766880E09 +++$+++ These are just photos of merchandise. I would prefer to use a reliable source that talks about them in detail. <font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ : These are just photos of merchandise. I would prefer to use a reliable source that talks about them in detail. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02b">Gary&nbsp;<b>King</b></font>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 05:28, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

284276 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284276 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-10-28 05:04:00 +++$+++ 1.162037040E09 +++$+++ This is an automated notice by  +++$+++ This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]].  If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 05:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
284277 +++$+++ Prainog +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284276 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-10-29 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.162116240E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :::::::--[[User:Prainog|Prainog]] 02:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

484286 +++$+++ RC-0722 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484286 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-09 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.202562600E09 +++$+++ I would like to request protection for the Weird al yankovic article. ''''' +++$+++ I would like to request protection for the Weird al yankovic article. '''''[[User:RC-0722|<font color="gray">RC-0722</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:RC-0722|<font color="blue">communicator</font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RC-0722|<font color="red">kills</font>]]</sub>''''' 05:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
484287 +++$+++ RC-0722 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484286 +++$+++ 484286 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 05:11:00 +++$+++ 1.202562660E09 +++$+++ There has been a content dispute. ''''' +++$+++ :There has been a content dispute. '''''[[User:RC-0722|<font color="gray">RC-0722</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:RC-0722|<font color="blue">communicator</font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RC-0722|<font color="red">kills</font>]]</sub>''''' 05:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
484288 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484286 +++$+++ 484287 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 05:14:00 +++$+++ 1.202562840E09 +++$+++ Looks like [[WP:AN3]] may be a good place for this.  \u2014 +++$+++ ::Looks like [[WP:AN3]] may be a good place for this.  —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 05:14, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
484289 +++$+++ RC-0722 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484286 +++$+++ 484288 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.202563020E09 +++$+++ Thanks. ''''' +++$+++ :::Thanks. '''''[[User:RC-0722|<font color="gray">RC-0722</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:RC-0722|<font color="blue">communicator</font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RC-0722|<font color="red">kills</font>]]</sub>''''' 05:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
484290 +++$+++ RC-0722 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484286 +++$+++ 484289 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 05:28:00 +++$+++ 1.202563680E09 +++$+++ But won't they reject it if it's an IP? ''''' +++$+++ ::::But won't they reject it if it's an IP? '''''[[User:RC-0722|<font color="gray">RC-0722</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:RC-0722|<font color="blue">communicator</font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RC-0722|<font color="red">kills</font>]]</sub>''''' 05:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
484291 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Wknight94 +++$+++ 484286 +++$+++ 484290 +++$+++ 2008-02-09 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.202563800E09 +++$+++ They shouldn't, no.  (Unless you know something I don't). \u2014 +++$+++ :::::They shouldn't, no.  (Unless you know something I don't). —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 05:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

284281 +++$+++ Bxsstudent +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284281 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-05 19:11:00 +++$+++ 1.162782660E09 +++$+++ The Science article is probably not ready, not yet developed to the level, to be nominated for featured article candidate. See Bronx Sience discussion. +++$+++ The Science article is probably not ready, not yet developed to the level, to be nominated for featured article candidate. See Bronx Sience discussion.[[User:Bxsstudent|Bxsstudent]] 19:11, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
284282 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284281 +++$+++ 284281 +++$+++ 2006-11-05 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.162783080E09 +++$+++ yes, I agree totally - I was not the one who nominated it, and I don't think it's ready to be a featured article either.  +++$+++ :yes, I agree totally - I was not the one who nominated it, and I don't think it's ready to be a featured article either. [[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] 19:18, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

546427 +++$+++ Rjd0060 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546427 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-26 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.209243900E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I've went ahead and fixed the problem.  That is a fairly common mistake, with a simple solution.  The page is now located at [[Roald Als]] and if you type [[Roald als]], you will be automatically redirected to the correct page.  For more information about what I've done, see [[Help:Moving a page]]. -  +++$+++ Hi.  I've went ahead and fixed the problem.  That is a fairly common mistake, with a simple solution.  The page is now located at [[Roald Als]] and if you type [[Roald als]], you will be automatically redirected to the correct page.  For more information about what I've done, see [[Help:Moving a page]]. - [[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] ([[User talk:Rjd0060|talk]]) 14:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
546428 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546427 +++$+++ 546427 +++$+++ 2008-04-28 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.209384600E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your prompt response. I very much appreciate the help.   +++$+++ :Thanks for your prompt response. I very much appreciate the help.  [[User:CactusWriter|CactusWriter]] ([[User talk:CactusWriter#top|talk]]) 05:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

284285 +++$+++ Indon  +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284285 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-09 09:49:00 +++$+++ 1.163094540E09 +++$+++ Hi, thank you for notifying me. The article was delisted from [[WP:GA]] page. However, what is strange for me is [[User:Qazws11]] nominated the article for the collaboration of the week after (s)he passed the article for GA. The GA COTW is used to drive an article to get a GA status. So it's useless if an article is nominated for GA COTW after it gets GA status. Furthermore, since I re-listed the article at [[WP:GAC]], I raised question at [[WP:GACo#Bronx_High_School_of_Science]]. Do you want to nominate at [[WP:GAC]] or as GA COTW? Cheers. &mdash;  +++$+++ Hi, thank you for notifying me. The article was delisted from [[WP:GA]] page. However, what is strange for me is [[User:Qazws11]] nominated the article for the collaboration of the week after (s)he passed the article for GA. The GA COTW is used to drive an article to get a GA status. So it's useless if an article is nominated for GA COTW after it gets GA status. Furthermore, since I re-listed the article at [[WP:GAC]], I raised question at [[WP:GACo#Bronx_High_School_of_Science]]. Do you want to nominate at [[WP:GAC]] or as GA COTW? Cheers. &mdash; [[User:Indon|Indon]] ([[User_talk:Indon |<font color="green">reply</font>]]) &mdash; 09:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
284286 +++$+++ Indon  +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284285 +++$+++ 284285 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 18:16:00 +++$+++ 1.163124960E09 +++$+++ Yes, you are right, I was wrong. Another GA reviewer has explained in the GA COTW page. Let's see if the article passes GA, then the nomination can continue. Sorry. &mdash;  +++$+++ :Yes, you are right, I was wrong. Another GA reviewer has explained in the GA COTW page. Let's see if the article passes GA, then the nomination can continue. Sorry. &mdash; [[User:Indon|Indon]] ([[User_talk:Indon |<font color="green">reply</font>]]) &mdash; 18:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
284287 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284285 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-09 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.163125260E09 +++$+++ Ah, ok - the reason I raised it is I saw no point in pursuing GACo of the week if it was going to be shot down because the GA status was removed.  So I think where we stand now is that the article is nominated for Good Article status, awaiting reviews, and we'll take it from there.  Thanks +++$+++ :::Ah, ok - the reason I raised it is I saw no point in pursuing GACo of the week if it was going to be shot down because the GA status was removed.  So I think where we stand now is that the article is nominated for Good Article status, awaiting reviews, and we'll take it from there.  Thanks[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] 18:21, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

546431 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546431 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-01 03:06:00 +++$+++ 1.209636360E09 +++$+++ albums, songs, and other media cannot be deleted via speedy as non notable. See WP:CSD. ''' +++$+++ albums, songs, and other media cannot be deleted via speedy as non notable. See WP:CSD. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 03:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
546432 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546431 +++$+++ 546431 +++$+++ 2008-05-01 12:35:00 +++$+++ 1.209670500E09 +++$+++ Thanks for posting the reminder to me about WP:CSD. Without a doubt, there are times I have been too quick to pull the speedy delete trigger. Although it's much easier to discard the seemingly trivial stuff, I do believe it's better -- and broader-minded -- and more rewarding -- to help it along instead. I need to be reminded of that occasionally.  +++$+++ :Thanks for posting the reminder to me about WP:CSD. Without a doubt, there are times I have been too quick to pull the speedy delete trigger. Although it's much easier to discard the seemingly trivial stuff, I do believe it's better -- and broader-minded -- and more rewarding -- to help it along instead. I need to be reminded of that occasionally. [[User:CactusWriter|CactusWriter]] ([[User talk:CactusWriter#top|talk]]) 12:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

284289 +++$+++ Bellagio99 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284289 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-09 13:37:00 +++$+++ 1.173476220E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Bellagio99|Bellagio99]] 13:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
284290 +++$+++ Bellagio99 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284289 +++$+++ 284289 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 03:50:00 +++$+++ 1.176029400E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Bellagio99|Bellagio99]] 03:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
284291 +++$+++ Bellagio99 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284289 +++$+++ 284290 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.176030060E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Bellagio99|Bellagio99]] 04:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

284292 +++$+++ Bellagio99 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284292 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-08 04:23:00 +++$+++ 1.176031380E09 +++$+++ I just checked the 2 URLs, and Bobby seems to be the highest 64K winner. I went back to the millionaires, etc. Anyway, it's late, I may have missed something, so highest or 2nd highest, it's your call. Good nite.  +++$+++ I just checked the 2 URLs, and Bobby seems to be the highest 64K winner. I went back to the millionaires, etc. Anyway, it's late, I may have missed something, so highest or 2nd highest, it's your call. Good nite. [[User:Bellagio99|Bellagio99]] 04:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
284293 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284292 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 04:27:00 +++$+++ 1.176031620E09 +++$+++ Look at p 2 - Teddy Nagler or Nadler (don't have it open) seems to have been #1, with Bobby #2 - I think. <strong> +++$+++ :::::Look at p 2 - Teddy Nagler or Nadler (don't have it open) seems to have been #1, with Bobby #2 - I think. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 04:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
284294 +++$+++ Bellagio99 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284292 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 04:36:00 +++$+++ 1.176032160E09 +++$+++ Yup, you're right. I even remember Nadler. Musta missed it. Another signal that it it is time to shut down NOW.  +++$+++ ::::::Yup, you're right. I even remember Nadler. Musta missed it. Another signal that it it is time to shut down NOW. [[User:Bellagio99|Bellagio99]] 04:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

546439 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-18 12:15:00 +++$+++ 1.211138100E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 12:15, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
546440 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546439 +++$+++ 546439 +++$+++ 2008-05-18 14:36:00 +++$+++ 1.211146560E09 +++$+++ {{done}} Thanks for the reminder about this image. After a discussion, the editors of the article for which it was intended agreed to use a different image. I forgot that I had left this hanging in limbo. I've submitted it for speedy deletion.  +++$+++ :{{done}} Thanks for the reminder about this image. After a discussion, the editors of the article for which it was intended agreed to use a different image. I forgot that I had left this hanging in limbo. I've submitted it for speedy deletion. [[User:CactusWriter|CactusWriter]] ([[User talk:CactusWriter#top|talk]]) 14:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

546442 +++$+++ davidwr +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-05-26 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.211858760E09 +++$+++ <strike>[[William Keane]] redirects to [[Bil Keane]].  The disambiguation notice is appropriate.  Alternatively, [[William Keane]] can redirect to the bishop and the bishop's page can have a disambig tag.  But the way it is now just doesn't work if someone types in ''William Keane'' and is looking for the bishop. <\/strike> Nevermind, I'm going to make this a full disambig page.   +++$+++ <strike>[[William Keane]] redirects to [[Bil Keane]].  The disambiguation notice is appropriate.  Alternatively, [[William Keane]] can redirect to the bishop and the bishop's page can have a disambig tag.  But the way it is now just doesn't work if someone types in ''William Keane'' and is looking for the bishop. </strike> Nevermind, I'm going to make this a full disambig page.  [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])/([[Special:Emailuser/davidwr|e-mail]])</small></small> 20:26, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
546443 +++$+++ CactusWriter  +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546442 +++$+++ 546442 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.211859240E09 +++$+++ You're right -- my mistake -- removing the disambiguation notice didn't work like I was thinking. I was going to revert it back. But a disambig page would be fine, too.  +++$+++ :You're right -- my mistake -- removing the disambiguation notice didn't work like I was thinking. I was going to revert it back. But a disambig page would be fine, too. [[User:CactusWriter |<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span>''Writer'']] 20:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
546444 +++$+++ davidwr +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546442 +++$+++ 546443 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.211859480E09 +++$+++ Done.  Well, considering there are two notable actors with similar names, and one of them was already incorrectly blue-linked to [[William Keane]]....   +++$+++ ::Done.  Well, considering there are two notable actors with similar names, and one of them was already incorrectly blue-linked to [[William Keane]]....  [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])/([[Special:Emailuser/davidwr|e-mail]])</small></small> 20:38, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
546445 +++$+++ CactusWriter  +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546442 +++$+++ 546444 +++$+++ 2008-05-26 20:43:00 +++$+++ 1.211859780E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Nicely done. I think there's also an American artist named William Keane. And probably more will eventually show up  +++$+++ :::Thanks. Nicely done. I think there's also an American artist named William Keane. And probably more will eventually show up [[User:CactusWriter |<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span>''Writer'']] 20:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

284299 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284299 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-25 07:54:00 +++$+++ 1.164470040E09 +++$+++ So, I take that we are not only the same age and similar backgrounds but also grew up near one another & listened to the same radio stations? I don't remember B. Mitchell Reed (before my time?), but I was certainly listening to WMCA before Alex Bennett got there (and well into his tenure, and even when they first went talk radio). Actually, I probably remember their one talk show from the mid-60s\u2014Barry Gray\u2014better than any of the DJs. Gray had an amazing selection of guests, everyone from the editors of ''Screw'' to Herman Badillo. Bennett was certainly the best WMCA DJ I remember but I'm thinking before his time, \"Home of the Good Guys\", playing the Count Five next to Staff Sgt. Barry Sadler and Johnny Cash next to the Stones, where a \"Golden Oldie\" often meant six months ago.  Top 25 radio\u2014not even Top 40. Other DJs I remember were Harry Harrison and Gary Stevens. Does that date it pretty precisely? -  +++$+++ So, I take that we are not only the same age and similar backgrounds but also grew up near one another & listened to the same radio stations? I don't remember B. Mitchell Reed (before my time?), but I was certainly listening to WMCA before Alex Bennett got there (and well into his tenure, and even when they first went talk radio). Actually, I probably remember their one talk show from the mid-60s—Barry Gray—better than any of the DJs. Gray had an amazing selection of guests, everyone from the editors of ''Screw'' to Herman Badillo. Bennett was certainly the best WMCA DJ I remember but I'm thinking before his time, "Home of the Good Guys", playing the Count Five next to Staff Sgt. Barry Sadler and Johnny Cash next to the Stones, where a "Golden Oldie" often meant six months ago.  Top 25 radio—not even Top 40. Other DJs I remember were Harry Harrison and Gary Stevens. Does that date it pretty precisely? - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 07:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
284300 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284299 +++$+++ 284299 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.164514200E09 +++$+++ Alex Bennett: Anyone who played Terry Riley's \"Rainbow in Curved Air\" on a rock station is alright by me, poser politics notwithstanding. -  +++$+++ :Alex Bennett: Anyone who played Terry Riley's "Rainbow in Curved Air" on a rock station is alright by me, poser politics notwithstanding. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 20:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
284301 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284299 +++$+++ 284299 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.164514380E09 +++$+++ Century: Several have the year only in the title. Two leap to mind: the Bee Gees \"New York Mining Disaster, 1941\" and \"Aladdin Sane (1913-1938-197?)\", which I used for 1938. And there are some instrumentals. -  +++$+++ :Century: Several have the year only in the title. Two leap to mind: the Bee Gees "New York Mining Disaster, 1941" and "Aladdin Sane (1913-1938-197?)", which I used for 1938. And there are some instrumentals. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 20:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

284302 +++$+++ JeffBurdges +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-25 04:11:00 +++$+++ 1.164456660E09 +++$+++ The Cat Stephens quote consists of him just talking while he's thinking about what to say, annd he finally finds it and says it: Christians have all this stuff in their religious books too.  By including the whole quote, it make it less likely that people actually read what he finally got around to saying.  I think the rest of the section makes it clear that his opinion is mixed and flexible (yes to killing Rushdie, no to vigilantism, maybe to non-leathal vigilantism, etc).  This quote clearly does not contain a retraction, but it does ask christians to think about his position in their own terms.  So that what I thought was the important part.  I'm not sure why I even left those first two sentences there the first time.   +++$+++ The Cat Stephens quote consists of him just talking while he's thinking about what to say, annd he finally finds it and says it: Christians have all this stuff in their religious books too.  By including the whole quote, it make it less likely that people actually read what he finally got around to saying.  I think the rest of the section makes it clear that his opinion is mixed and flexible (yes to killing Rushdie, no to vigilantism, maybe to non-leathal vigilantism, etc).  This quote clearly does not contain a retraction, but it does ask christians to think about his position in their own terms.  So that what I thought was the important part.  I'm not sure why I even left those first two sentences there the first time.  [[User:JeffBurdges|JeffBurdges]] 04:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
284303 +++$+++ JeffBurdges +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284302 +++$+++ 284302 +++$+++ 2006-11-25 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.164459300E09 +++$+++ Okay, I'll just be happy with the fact that the sentence I are about is the last line in the quote.   +++$+++ :Okay, I'll just be happy with the fact that the sentence I are about is the last line in the quote.  [[User:JeffBurdges|JeffBurdges]] 04:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

284304 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284304 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-30 07:29:00 +++$+++ 1.164900540E09 +++$+++ Thank you - the \"he was 53 years old\" had to go, and I feel honoured.  Of all the edits I've seen recently, it is one of my favourites. On the bright side it didn't say \"''unfortunately'' he was ''only'' 53 years old\".  I've never seen the \"unfortunately\" and the \"only\" used in one sentence and my head will surely explode if ever I do.   I thought I'd take a peek at the [[Andy Gibb]] article, and sure enough, my worst fears were confirmed, so I decided to match your edit with [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Andy_Gibb&diff=91106934&oldid=88358737 this one].   Very satisfying! :-)   +++$+++ Thank you - the "he was 53 years old" had to go, and I feel honoured.  Of all the edits I've seen recently, it is one of my favourites. On the bright side it didn't say "''unfortunately'' he was ''only'' 53 years old".  I've never seen the "unfortunately" and the "only" used in one sentence and my head will surely explode if ever I do.   I thought I'd take a peek at the [[Andy Gibb]] article, and sure enough, my worst fears were confirmed, so I decided to match your edit with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andy_Gibb&diff=91106934&oldid=88358737 this one].   Very satisfying! :-)  [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] 07:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
284305 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284304 +++$+++ 284304 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 11:23:00 +++$+++ 1.164914580E09 +++$+++ Blame me, that's fine.  I've been told by a few editors that we should remember not everyone is good at math, to which I asked, \"does that mean we should be intentionally aiming Wikipedia at people who are not good at math?\", and the answer I got was \"yes, we should.\"  I was a little surprised.   Then I said \"a lot of people can't read but we keep writing articles\", and nobody replied to that one.   I suspect that by then only the people who can't read were still hanging around, probably hoping that I would upload a picture, and the people who aren't good at math had gone, which was unlucky because apparently they ''can'' read, and they could have commented.  It would have been nice.  I get the impression that you can read, plus you're good at math.  That's an unusual combination.   Let's see how quickly you get reverted. I commend your fortitude, even if you are planning on offering me up to the angry mob!  Cheers!   +++$+++ :Blame me, that's fine.  I've been told by a few editors that we should remember not everyone is good at math, to which I asked, "does that mean we should be intentionally aiming Wikipedia at people who are not good at math?", and the answer I got was "yes, we should."  I was a little surprised.   Then I said "a lot of people can't read but we keep writing articles", and nobody replied to that one.   I suspect that by then only the people who can't read were still hanging around, probably hoping that I would upload a picture, and the people who aren't good at math had gone, which was unlucky because apparently they ''can'' read, and they could have commented.  It would have been nice.  I get the impression that you can read, plus you're good at math.  That's an unusual combination.   Let's see how quickly you get reverted. I commend your fortitude, even if you are planning on offering me up to the angry mob!  Cheers!  [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] 11:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
284306 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284304 +++$+++ 284304 +++$+++ 2006-12-01 07:10:00 +++$+++ 1.164985800E09 +++$+++ Well, however a day is made is not important.  I'm pleased you like it.  :-) Cheers  +++$+++ :Well, however a day is made is not important.  I'm pleased you like it.  :-) Cheers [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] 07:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

546449 +++$+++ SailorAlphaCentauri +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546449 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-05 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.212708000E09 +++$+++ I had no idea that [[Aaron McGruder]] struck out against [[Bil Keane]] and the others in a New Yorker article in 2004.  The incident in question that McGruder took offense to ocurred in 2000 and it is listed in his biography on [[IMBD]] as the starting point of his rivalry with Keane (that's how I initially found out about it).  I agree that it's a non-issue for Keane [no article or website I found had any criticism towards McGruder, although one  article came as close as I've ever seen to Keane criticizing other comic strip artists and a complaint about the changing landscape in general (http:\/\/www.americancatholic.org\/messenger\/nov2001\/feature1.asp)], but McGruder sees it very differently.  I found a working link to the New Yorker article, so I was going to add it to the McGruder article, but it appears to already be used (but not in context of how he feels about other comic artists).  His article ''could'' use a little sprucing up, so maybe a new section on his one-sided rivalry with Keane can be added.  I need to spend some time reading the article, because it appears, at first blush, to be critical of the contemporary African-American comics that were being published before he came on the scene, and some of that might be worth mentioning in his entry as well.  +++$+++ I had no idea that [[Aaron McGruder]] struck out against [[Bil Keane]] and the others in a New Yorker article in 2004.  The incident in question that McGruder took offense to ocurred in 2000 and it is listed in his biography on [[IMBD]] as the starting point of his rivalry with Keane (that's how I initially found out about it).  I agree that it's a non-issue for Keane [no article or website I found had any criticism towards McGruder, although one  article came as close as I've ever seen to Keane criticizing other comic strip artists and a complaint about the changing landscape in general (http://www.americancatholic.org/messenger/nov2001/feature1.asp)], but McGruder sees it very differently.  I found a working link to the New Yorker article, so I was going to add it to the McGruder article, but it appears to already be used (but not in context of how he feels about other comic artists).  His article ''could'' use a little sprucing up, so maybe a new section on his one-sided rivalry with Keane can be added.  I need to spend some time reading the article, because it appears, at first blush, to be critical of the contemporary African-American comics that were being published before he came on the scene, and some of that might be worth mentioning in his entry as well. [[User:SailorAlphaCentauri|SailorAlphaCentauri]] ([[User talk:SailorAlphaCentauri|talk]]) 16:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
546450 +++$+++ SailorAlphaCentauri +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546449 +++$+++ 546449 +++$+++ 2008-06-05 18:23:00 +++$+++ 1.212715380E09 +++$+++ Interestingly enough, I found the interview Aaron McGruder gave to the Onion where he says he felt misrepresented in his New Yorker article (http:\/\/www.avclub.com\/content\/node\/42840), so who knows where the truth lies with this guy.  +++$+++ :Interestingly enough, I found the interview Aaron McGruder gave to the Onion where he says he felt misrepresented in his New Yorker article (http://www.avclub.com/content/node/42840), so who knows where the truth lies with this guy. [[User:SailorAlphaCentauri|SailorAlphaCentauri]] ([[User talk:SailorAlphaCentauri|talk]]) 18:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
546451 +++$+++ CactusWriter  +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546449 +++$+++ 546450 +++$+++ 2008-06-08 10:40:00 +++$+++ 1.212946800E09 +++$+++ I agree with you that the [[Aaron McGruder]] article needs to be modernized a bit. As far as his controversy with other cartoonists, I think McGruder felt antagonistic toward the 'old guard' of the cartoonists community -- who tended to be mostly elderly, white, conservative guys like Keane, Walker, Hart, Schulz, etc. -- and he reacted accordingly. (Which is actually a fairly common reaction among young cartoonists trying to find a rare break in a very, very limited marketspace like newspaper comics. Watterson, Breathed, Trudeau all had similar run-ins with the older established guys.) I had also heard that McGruder criticized the earlier African-American cartoonists like Morrie Turner -- although, as far as I know, Turner never reacted to it. But, I do think the [http:\/\/www.avclub.com\/content\/node\/42840 AV club] article you found is interesting. It shows McGruder in a much better light -- and probably indicates the natural differences between the thoughts and reactions of a inexperienced 26-year-old back in 2000, and a more mature 34-year-old now.  +++$+++ ::I agree with you that the [[Aaron McGruder]] article needs to be modernized a bit. As far as his controversy with other cartoonists, I think McGruder felt antagonistic toward the 'old guard' of the cartoonists community -- who tended to be mostly elderly, white, conservative guys like Keane, Walker, Hart, Schulz, etc. -- and he reacted accordingly. (Which is actually a fairly common reaction among young cartoonists trying to find a rare break in a very, very limited marketspace like newspaper comics. Watterson, Breathed, Trudeau all had similar run-ins with the older established guys.) I had also heard that McGruder criticized the earlier African-American cartoonists like Morrie Turner -- although, as far as I know, Turner never reacted to it. But, I do think the [http://www.avclub.com/content/node/42840 AV club] article you found is interesting. It shows McGruder in a much better light -- and probably indicates the natural differences between the thoughts and reactions of a inexperienced 26-year-old back in 2000, and a more mature 34-year-old now. [[User:CactusWriter |<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span>''Writer'']] 10:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

284307 +++$+++ Academic Challenger +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284307 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-01 04:25:00 +++$+++ 1.164975900E09 +++$+++ I decided not to block that IP. This is a difficult case, but I decided it was pointless to block an IP several hours after it last vandalizes. I am sure that it will be blocked for an even longer period if it vandalizes again.  +++$+++ I decided not to block that IP. This is a difficult case, but I decided it was pointless to block an IP several hours after it last vandalizes. I am sure that it will be blocked for an even longer period if it vandalizes again. [[User:Academic Challenger|Academic Challenger]] 04:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
284308 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284307 +++$+++ 284307 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 05:17:00 +++$+++ 1.165065420E09 +++$+++ Hi Tvoz, well I don't agree entirely with all of Wikipedia's uberrestrictive policies either, despite my recent spats with some other editors, but I think that the way to change a policy is to discuss it, not simply disregard it - I understand our policy errs on the side of caution rather than applying fair use doctrine to the letter.  Anyhow I think the big question with promo photos is this - can the image be replaced with a free alternative that would provide the same information?  Often the answer is yes, especially with a living celebrity because it is theoretically ''possible'' to get a free image (not necessarily easy, but possible).  The difference with a dead celebrity is that the number of photos in existence is finite and if a free image doesn't exist already it's too late to create it. Lately a school of thought has emerged here that contends images of dead celebrities are more allowable and less likely to be challenged than images of living celebrities.   I think the image you've found is therefore as acceptable as many other images that are regarded as acceptable.  I would upload it, ensure you link to source, but most importantly provide a fair use rationale.  Then .... double check that a \"replaceable tag\" has not automatically been applied to the image.  Something has been changed recently in the upload process that automatically adds the tag, but I don't know under what circumstances it's added. I think if you choose a licence it doesn't like, it automatically tags it.   If the tag is added, you should remove it because it wouldn't apply.   I've been adding generic fair use rationales to previously existing images of dead celebrities.  A couple of examples are [[:Image:Fredginger.jpg]] ([[Fred Astaire]] and [[Ginger Rogers]] - I got a bit specific with this image because I wanted it to cover use in both articles), and [[:Image:Gloria3.jpg]] ([[Gloria Swanson]] - this is more generic and I've applied this to numerous similar images of various people.)  Let me know if there's anything you need a hand with.  As for Commons - I've uploaded some screenshots from public domain films on there.  I haven't spent much time there and I'm not as familiar with how it all works - I find it a little scary to tell the truth!  Happy uploading.  You could really be mischievous and choose the Witch Hazell image instead.  It's very .... ummmm.... nice?  No?  Cheers  +++$+++ :Hi Tvoz, well I don't agree entirely with all of Wikipedia's uberrestrictive policies either, despite my recent spats with some other editors, but I think that the way to change a policy is to discuss it, not simply disregard it - I understand our policy errs on the side of caution rather than applying fair use doctrine to the letter.  Anyhow I think the big question with promo photos is this - can the image be replaced with a free alternative that would provide the same information?  Often the answer is yes, especially with a living celebrity because it is theoretically ''possible'' to get a free image (not necessarily easy, but possible).  The difference with a dead celebrity is that the number of photos in existence is finite and if a free image doesn't exist already it's too late to create it. Lately a school of thought has emerged here that contends images of dead celebrities are more allowable and less likely to be challenged than images of living celebrities.   I think the image you've found is therefore as acceptable as many other images that are regarded as acceptable.  I would upload it, ensure you link to source, but most importantly provide a fair use rationale.  Then .... double check that a "replaceable tag" has not automatically been applied to the image.  Something has been changed recently in the upload process that automatically adds the tag, but I don't know under what circumstances it's added. I think if you choose a licence it doesn't like, it automatically tags it.   If the tag is added, you should remove it because it wouldn't apply.   I've been adding generic fair use rationales to previously existing images of dead celebrities.  A couple of examples are [[:Image:Fredginger.jpg]] ([[Fred Astaire]] and [[Ginger Rogers]] - I got a bit specific with this image because I wanted it to cover use in both articles), and [[:Image:Gloria3.jpg]] ([[Gloria Swanson]] - this is more generic and I've applied this to numerous similar images of various people.)  Let me know if there's anything you need a hand with.  As for Commons - I've uploaded some screenshots from public domain films on there.  I haven't spent much time there and I'm not as familiar with how it all works - I find it a little scary to tell the truth!  Happy uploading.  You could really be mischievous and choose the Witch Hazell image instead.  It's very .... ummmm.... nice?  No?  Cheers [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] 05:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
284309 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284307 +++$+++ 284308 +++$+++ 2006-12-02 05:23:00 +++$+++ 1.165065780E09 +++$+++ PS.  I've also seen some discussions that suggest we should extend this idea to include living celebrities if we're looking for an image that represents a person at their period of fame.  The example given was [[Bettie Page]] an 80+ year old woman who was a popular pinup 50 years ago.  The question there is - do we want a picture of 80+ year Bettie (preferably with her clothes on) to show what she ''looks'' like, or do we want 25 year old Bettie in a bikini to show what she ''looked like when she was famous''?  No decision on that one, but it's interesting isn't it?   +++$+++ ::PS.  I've also seen some discussions that suggest we should extend this idea to include living celebrities if we're looking for an image that represents a person at their period of fame.  The example given was [[Bettie Page]] an 80+ year old woman who was a popular pinup 50 years ago.  The question there is - do we want a picture of 80+ year Bettie (preferably with her clothes on) to show what she ''looks'' like, or do we want 25 year old Bettie in a bikini to show what she ''looked like when she was famous''?  No decision on that one, but it's interesting isn't it?  [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] 05:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

546452 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-06 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.212777180E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 11:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
546453 +++$+++ CactusWriter  +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546452 +++$+++ 546452 +++$+++ 2008-06-08 08:18:00 +++$+++ 1.212938280E09 +++$+++ {{done}} Several users have uploaded similar posters for this movie. I've submitted this one for speedy deletion.  +++$+++ :{{done}} Several users have uploaded similar posters for this movie. I've submitted this one for speedy deletion. [[User:CactusWriter |<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span>''Writer'']] 08:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

284310 +++$+++ Rockpocket +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284310 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-04 09:04:00 +++$+++ 1.165251840E09 +++$+++ Regarding your request at [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism]] {{user:WeinsteinWarWolf}} was blocked (see: [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:WeinsteinWarWolf]). However blocked users can continue to edit their talkpage, which is what he or she has been doing since.  +++$+++ Regarding your request at [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism]] {{user:WeinsteinWarWolf}} was blocked (see: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:WeinsteinWarWolf]). However blocked users can continue to edit their talkpage, which is what he or she has been doing since. [[User:Rockpocket|<font color="green">Rockpock</font>]]<font color="black">e</font>[[User_talk:Rockpocket|<font color="green">t</font>]] 09:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
284311 +++$+++ Rockpocket +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284310 +++$+++ 284310 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.165252140E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. He or she has been blocked indefinitely, but will probably return under another account. They usually do.  +++$+++ : You're welcome. He or she has been blocked indefinitely, but will probably return under another account. They usually do. [[User:Rockpocket|<font color="green">Rockpock</font>]]<font color="black">e</font>[[User_talk:Rockpocket|<font color="green">t</font>]] 09:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

571673 +++$+++ Jeffq +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571673 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-02 09:48:00 +++$+++ 1.183394880E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJeffq&diff=141956626&oldid=141561965 the Barnstar Award]! I appreciate the recognition, but I'm a little confused about what it was that I did that inspired this award. I'm mostly an [[wikt:under the radar|under-the-radar]] kind of editor, and I don't notice anything you and I have both worked on. Whatever it was, I'll try to do more of it! <big>&#9786;<\/big> ~  +++$+++ Thank you very much for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJeffq&diff=141956626&oldid=141561965 the Barnstar Award]! I appreciate the recognition, but I'm a little confused about what it was that I did that inspired this award. I'm mostly an [[wikt:under the radar|under-the-radar]] kind of editor, and I don't notice anything you and I have both worked on. Whatever it was, I'll try to do more of it! <big>&#9786;</big> ~ [[User:Jeffq|Jeff Q]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Jeffq|(talk)]] 09:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
571674 +++$+++ Springeragh +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571673 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.183681200E09 +++$+++ I would have loved to light fireworks myself but it's illegal in most of Northern California without a permit\u2014which I obviously don't have. So instead I drove 2\xbd hours to [[Auburn, California|Auburn]] which is the nearest town with good fireworks (there's a closer town; only about 1\xbd hours away but their fireworks are pathetic). I didn't get home until past midnight. :| But I had my annual 4<sup>th<\/sup> of July grill and I had a hot dog so all's good, eh? ;) &mdash;  +++$+++ ::I would have loved to light fireworks myself but it's illegal in most of Northern California without a permit—which I obviously don't have. So instead I drove 2½ hours to [[Auburn, California|Auburn]] which is the nearest town with good fireworks (there's a closer town; only about 1½ hours away but their fireworks are pathetic). I didn't get home until past midnight. :| But I had my annual 4<sup>th</sup> of July grill and I had a hot dog so all's good, eh? ;) &mdash; [[User:Springeragh|<span style="background:#808;color:#fff;text-decoration:none;">&nbsp;'''''$PЯING'''''</span>]][[User talk:Springeragh|<span style="background:#808;color:#fff;text-decoration:none;">rαgђ&nbsp;</span>]] 17:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

284312 +++$+++ Liverpool Scouse +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284312 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-06 15:09:00 +++$+++ 1.165446540E09 +++$+++ Glad to help - put the usual <nowiki>{{subst:test4}}<\/nowiki> for example, but after the test4 put a vertical line - | - and the page name without a Wiki link (it does that itself).  Giving you,  <nowiki>{{subst:test4|John Lennon}}<\/nowiki> which will include in the warning, ...as you did to [[John Lennon]].... or similar. Kev    +++$+++ Glad to help - put the usual <nowiki>{{subst:test4}}</nowiki> for example, but after the test4 put a vertical line - | - and the page name without a Wiki link (it does that itself).  Giving you,  <nowiki>{{subst:test4|John Lennon}}</nowiki> which will include in the warning, ...as you did to [[John Lennon]].... or similar. Kev   [[User:Liverpool Scouse|Liverpool Scouse]] 15:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
284313 +++$+++ Liverpool Scouse +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284312 +++$+++ 284312 +++$+++ 2006-12-06 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.165467420E09 +++$+++ Yes I saw the suggestion on [[Talk:John Lennon]], and see that it's been given protection, which is welcome news - God knows how much reverting would be getting done otherwise!   +++$+++ * Yes I saw the suggestion on [[Talk:John Lennon]], and see that it's been given protection, which is welcome news - God knows how much reverting would be getting done otherwise!  [[User:Liverpool Scouse|Liverpool Scouse]] 20:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
284314 +++$+++ Liverpool Scouse +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284312 +++$+++ 284313 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 20:08:00 +++$+++ 1.165637280E09 +++$+++ Yep, I did have a check earlier today and expected to see loads of reverts on the history so I was pleasantly suprised! I think it hasn't really attracted as much media attention this year as last year, with it being the 25th anniversary last year and all.  But indeed - a toast John, 26 years on and still as influential as ever.   +++$+++ ** Yep, I did have a check earlier today and expected to see loads of reverts on the history so I was pleasantly suprised! I think it hasn't really attracted as much media attention this year as last year, with it being the 25th anniversary last year and all.  But indeed - a toast John, 26 years on and still as influential as ever.  [[User:Liverpool Scouse|Liverpool Scouse]] 20:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
284315 +++$+++ Liverpool Scouse +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284312 +++$+++ 284314 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.165639200E09 +++$+++ It's sad that he got killed over there when he loved it so much due to the freedom he had to wander the streets without being harrassed by fans too much.  Having said that, Chapman was so obsessed he more than likely would have travelled to any other city had Lennon chosen to live there.  New York has done him proud though - The Strawberry Fields park and Imagine memorial are perfect ways to remember him.  +++$+++ *** It's sad that he got killed over there when he loved it so much due to the freedom he had to wander the streets without being harrassed by fans too much.  Having said that, Chapman was so obsessed he more than likely would have travelled to any other city had Lennon chosen to live there.  New York has done him proud though - The Strawberry Fields park and Imagine memorial are perfect ways to remember him. [[User:Liverpool Scouse|Liverpool Scouse]] 20:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

546457 +++$+++ Mia-etol +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546457 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-06-12 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.213279320E09 +++$+++ Since you added the \"controversy\" tag there has been no discussion on  the talk page. And nobody has responded to my request for discussion, so it's impossible to achieve a consensus. I did revert a major rewrite of the article which was very one-sided but the author of the rewrite hasn't protested about the revert. I'm not sure now how to proceed. As the trial is now over, I'd like to finish work on the article so that it reflects the NPOV policy. -- +++$+++ Since you added the "controversy" tag there has been no discussion on  the talk page. And nobody has responded to my request for discussion, so it's impossible to achieve a consensus. I did revert a major rewrite of the article which was very one-sided but the author of the rewrite hasn't protested about the revert. I'm not sure now how to proceed. As the trial is now over, I'd like to finish work on the article so that it reflects the NPOV policy. --[[User:Mia-etol|Mia-etol]] ([[User talk:Mia-etol|talk]]) 07:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
546458 +++$+++ CactusWriter  +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546457 +++$+++ 546457 +++$+++ 2008-06-12 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.213296840E09 +++$+++ I think you've certainly been very fair -- as well as patient -- in your requests for discussion. Given the lack of response, I think you should just go ahead and work on the article (NPOV, of course). If anyone has a problem, the discussion will begin quickly enough. By the way, from the start I have felt that \"Raytheon 9\" might be the wrong title for this article. I thought that perhaps this should be an article about the Derry Anti-War Coalition with Raytheon 9 as a subheading. At any rate, there should be an explanation given about the DAWC (history, organization, and goals) if not on the Raytheon article, than on its own page. Perhaps you can consider this?  +++$+++ :I think you've certainly been very fair -- as well as patient -- in your requests for discussion. Given the lack of response, I think you should just go ahead and work on the article (NPOV, of course). If anyone has a problem, the discussion will begin quickly enough. By the way, from the start I have felt that "Raytheon 9" might be the wrong title for this article. I thought that perhaps this should be an article about the Derry Anti-War Coalition with Raytheon 9 as a subheading. At any rate, there should be an explanation given about the DAWC (history, organization, and goals) if not on the Raytheon article, than on its own page. Perhaps you can consider this? [[User:CactusWriter |<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span>''Writer'']] 11:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

22172 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22172 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-04 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.267762020E09 +++$+++ I'm Airplaneman, and will be reviewing Pilotwings 64 for GA status. I look forward to us working together. Nice to meet you! Regards,  +++$+++ I'm Airplaneman, and will be reviewing Pilotwings 64 for GA status. I look forward to us working together. Nice to meet you! Regards, [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]] ''<sup>[[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;color:#33dd44">talk</span>]]</sup>'' 20:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
22173 +++$+++ Airplaneman +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22172 +++$+++ 22172 +++$+++ 2010-03-04 20:37:00 +++$+++ 1.267763820E09 +++$+++ There's one small issue. Once it's addressed, I'll be happy to pass it! Please leave a note on my talk page when you have dealt with it. Thanks,  +++$+++ :There's one small issue. Once it's addressed, I'll be happy to pass it! Please leave a note on my talk page when you have dealt with it. Thanks, [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]] ''<sup>[[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;color:#33dd44">talk</span>]]</sup>'' 20:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

611771 +++$+++ Power level (Dragon Ball) +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611771 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-06 17:50:00 +++$+++ 1.168134600E09 +++$+++ When ya can, see the [[Talk:Naruto Uzumaki#Survey\/Discussion|respective talk page]] for your opinion. Thanks!  +++$+++ When ya can, see the [[Talk:Naruto Uzumaki#Survey/Discussion|respective talk page]] for your opinion. Thanks! [[Special:Contributions/Power level (Dragon Ball)|PL(DB)]] 17:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
611772 +++$+++ Sasuke-kun27 +++$+++ Poetic Decay +++$+++ 611771 +++$+++ 611771 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 17:52:00 +++$+++ 1.168134720E09 +++$+++ Sure. \/\/  +++$+++ :Sure. // [[User:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="blue">'''Sasuke'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Sasuke-kun27|<font color="purple">'''-kun'''</font>]][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|<font color="black">'''27'''</font>]] 17:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

284318 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284318 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ One more violation of Wiki rules and you will be reported as a repeat violator. 23:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC) +++$+++ One more violation of Wiki rules and you will be reported as a repeat violator. 23:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
284319 +++$+++ ProhibitOnions +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284318 +++$+++ 284318 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.165776780E09 +++$+++ The user who added the above threat, [[User:Rjensen]], has been blocked by [[User:Khoikhoi]] for 31 hours for [[WP:3RR]].  +++$+++ :The user who added the above threat, [[User:Rjensen]], has been blocked by [[User:Khoikhoi]] for 31 hours for [[WP:3RR]]. [[User:ProhibitOnions|<span style="color:#800">Pro<span style="color:#a00">hib<span style="color:#b00">it'''<span style="color:#c00">O</span>ni'''</span>'''o'''</span>'''ns'''</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:ProhibitOnions|(T)]]</font></sup> 10:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
284320 +++$+++ Merope +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284318 +++$+++ 284319 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.165792080E09 +++$+++ I'm attempting mediation -- [[Talk:Nelson Rockefeller]] --  +++$+++ ::I'm attempting mediation -- [[Talk:Nelson Rockefeller]] -- [[User:Merope|<b><font color="#3D59AB">Merope</font></b>]] 15:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
284321 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284318 +++$+++ 284320 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 19:01:00 +++$+++ 1.165806060E09 +++$+++ This threat is unfounded.   +++$+++ :::This threat is unfounded.  [[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] 19:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

546463 +++$+++ Rune X2 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-17 08:29:00 +++$+++ 1.216308540E09 +++$+++ Hello CactusWriter. Regarding the Atlantis article. The plot is wrong. von Kammacher is not looking for a cure and he doesn't find a cure. Rather his wife dies and Eva Burns promises to be a good mother to his children and they both return to Copenhagen.  +++$+++ Hello CactusWriter. Regarding the Atlantis article. The plot is wrong. von Kammacher is not looking for a cure and he doesn't find a cure. Rather his wife dies and Eva Burns promises to be a good mother to his children and they both return to Copenhagen. [[User:Rune X2|Rune X2]] ([[User talk:Rune X2|talk]]) 08:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
546464 +++$+++ CactusWriter  +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546463 +++$+++ 546463 +++$+++ 2008-07-30 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.217423580E09 +++$+++ Hi, Witaku and welcome to Wikipedia. I was not the one who deleted the article you created. I tagged it for deletion because it lacked notability -- and it was subsequently deleted by an administrator after review. A Google search for \"Nyrva Dragonrhyne\" produces only 7 hits -- that is hardly \"a lot.\" Two of the hits are deleted wiki pages and the other 5 are from self-published websites: facebook and deviantart, neither of which is a proper [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reference source]]. I think if you wish to write articles about fictional characters, it would be a good idea to review some of the Wikipedia guidelines for notability, such as [[Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)#Elements of fiction]]. And check out some of the articles about notable anime\/manga characters already included in Wikipedia, such as [[Usagi Tsukino]] and [[Belldandy]]. This can help you in determining the suitability of future articles. Good luck  +++$+++ :Hi, Witaku and welcome to Wikipedia. I was not the one who deleted the article you created. I tagged it for deletion because it lacked notability -- and it was subsequently deleted by an administrator after review. A Google search for "Nyrva Dragonrhyne" produces only 7 hits -- that is hardly "a lot." Two of the hits are deleted wiki pages and the other 5 are from self-published websites: facebook and deviantart, neither of which is a proper [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reference source]]. I think if you wish to write articles about fictional characters, it would be a good idea to review some of the Wikipedia guidelines for notability, such as [[Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)#Elements of fiction]]. And check out some of the articles about notable anime/manga characters already included in Wikipedia, such as [[Usagi Tsukino]] and [[Belldandy]]. This can help you in determining the suitability of future articles. Good luck [[User:CactusWriter |<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span>''Writer'']] 06:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

22177 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22177 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-20 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.271805840E09 +++$+++ Hi Hibana, its Tintor2. Good work in Mega Man articles. I have been editing the articles [[Mega Man Legends (video game)]] and [[Mega Man Legends 2]], but I could find only little info about development of the titles. Does the book Mega Man: Official Complete Works contain some information about the sub-series that could be added to the article? Regards. +++$+++ Hi Hibana, its Tintor2. Good work in Mega Man articles. I have been editing the articles [[Mega Man Legends (video game)]] and [[Mega Man Legends 2]], but I could find only little info about development of the titles. Does the book Mega Man: Official Complete Works contain some information about the sub-series that could be added to the article? Regards.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 16:24, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
22178 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22177 +++$+++ 22177 +++$+++ 2010-04-20 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.271807880E09 +++$+++ I see. Thanks. +++$+++ :I see. Thanks.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 16:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

284322 +++$+++ ProhibitOnions +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284322 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-10 11:32:00 +++$+++ 1.165779120E09 +++$+++ Hey, Tvoz, you might also be interested to learn that Rjensen has censored the [[Megan Marshak]] article as well. Granted, the revious text needed a lot of work, but we've got 31 hours... Regards,  +++$+++ Hey, Tvoz, you might also be interested to learn that Rjensen has censored the [[Megan Marshak]] article as well. Granted, the revious text needed a lot of work, but we've got 31 hours... Regards, [[User:ProhibitOnions|<span style="color:#800">Pro<span style="color:#a00">hib<span style="color:#b00">it'''<span style="color:#c00">O</span>ni'''</span>'''o'''</span>'''ns'''</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:ProhibitOnions|(T)]]</font></sup> 11:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
284323 +++$+++ JzG +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284322 +++$+++ 284322 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.165804800E09 +++$+++ Be that as it may, the model here is bold, revert, discuss.  Take it to Talk, please, and achieve consensus.  Your wording, if nothing else, needs work. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]<\/b> <small>( +++$+++ * Be that as it may, the model here is bold, revert, discuss.  Take it to Talk, please, and achieve consensus.  Your wording, if nothing else, needs work. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 18:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
284324 +++$+++ JzG +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284322 +++$+++ 284322 +++$+++ 2006-12-10 19:25:00 +++$+++ 1.165807500E09 +++$+++ Since you seem unclear, [[Nelson Rockefeller]]. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]<\/b> <small>( +++$+++ * Since you seem unclear, [[Nelson Rockefeller]]. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 19:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

22179 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22179 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-14 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.276567320E09 +++$+++ Congratulations for making [[Mega Man (video game)]] become a good article! Nice job. +++$+++ Congratulations for making [[Mega Man (video game)]] become a good article! Nice job.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 19:02, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
22180 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22179 +++$+++ 22179 +++$+++ 2010-06-14 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.276582860E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Personally, I did no think of nominating the Legends articles to GA as I'm not a native English speaker, and thus they are very well written. +++$+++ :Thanks. Personally, I did no think of nominating the Legends articles to GA as I'm not a native English speaker, and thus they are very well written.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 23:21, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

284326 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284326 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-14 21:23:00 +++$+++ 1.166160180E09 +++$+++ Absolutley NO problem about edit wars with me :) A lot of us have been working on the [[Paul McCartney|McCartney]] page, and over the last few weeks we have been trimming things on it (have a look and see what you think...) It's scary how finite a page has to be to get an FA. After the McCartney page gets an FA (which a few of us think it will) there have been suggestions that Lennon may be the next. This does not mean that hordes of us will descend on Lennon, but only a group of Beatles fans that can improve it - with the aim of getting an FA. We all get along really well, and we have had a good time working on 'Macca' together. You should join us (BTW, I'm not a scout leader, lol). -- +++$+++ Absolutley NO problem about edit wars with me :) A lot of us have been working on the [[Paul McCartney|McCartney]] page, and over the last few weeks we have been trimming things on it (have a look and see what you think...) It's scary how finite a page has to be to get an FA. After the McCartney page gets an FA (which a few of us think it will) there have been suggestions that Lennon may be the next. This does not mean that hordes of us will descend on Lennon, but only a group of Beatles fans that can improve it - with the aim of getting an FA. We all get along really well, and we have had a good time working on 'Macca' together. You should join us (BTW, I'm not a scout leader, lol). --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 21:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
284327 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284326 +++$+++ 284326 +++$+++ 2006-12-14 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.166161140E09 +++$+++ References? Uhh... we've got lots (and lots) of them on 'Macca' - even the \"hard-edged\", and \"baby-faced\" ones. Copy the book page references over, but don't forget to copy the book 'References' as well, or it won't make sense. Good work on protecting the Lennon page, BTW... -- +++$+++ :References? Uhh... we've got lots (and lots) of them on 'Macca' - even the "hard-edged", and "baby-faced" ones. Copy the book page references over, but don't forget to copy the book 'References' as well, or it won't make sense. Good work on protecting the Lennon page, BTW... --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 21:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

22184 +++$+++ PresN +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22184 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-23 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.277346900E09 +++$+++ Sure, I'm willing to give it a shot. No promises on GA status- it can be difficult to do if there's not a lot of reception and development information out there, but it will still be better than the scattered stubs we have today. I do think that it will need to be split up into multiple articles- Square Enix Music Online is telling me that there are [http:\/\/www.squareenixmusic.com\/series\/megaman\/discography.shtml 40] albums, which is a bit much to put into one article, even a list. I'll let you know when I start working on it. --''' +++$+++ Sure, I'm willing to give it a shot. No promises on GA status- it can be difficult to do if there's not a lot of reception and development information out there, but it will still be better than the scattered stubs we have today. I do think that it will need to be split up into multiple articles- Square Enix Music Online is telling me that there are [http://www.squareenixmusic.com/series/megaman/discography.shtml 40] albums, which is a bit much to put into one article, even a list. I'll let you know when I start working on it. --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green;">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue;">N</span>]]''' 19:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
22185 +++$+++ PresN +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22184 +++$+++ 22184 +++$+++ 2010-06-24 04:38:00 +++$+++ 1.277379480E09 +++$+++ Well, I started, with [[Music of the Mega Man Zero series|Music of the ''Mega Man Zero'' series]]. --''' +++$+++ :Well, I started, with [[Music of the Mega Man Zero series|Music of the ''Mega Man Zero'' series]]. --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green;">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue;">N</span>]]''' 04:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

571676 +++$+++ Aditya Kabir +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-05 10:55:00 +++$+++ 1.183658100E09 +++$+++ I have tried to respond to your test honestly. You can take a look at it now. How did I do?  +++$+++ I have tried to respond to your test honestly. You can take a look at it now. How did I do? [[User:Aditya Kabir|Aditya Kabir]] 10:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
571677 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571676 +++$+++ 571676 +++$+++ 2007-07-06 09:07:00 +++$+++ 1.183738020E09 +++$+++ Ok, I've responded to your answers. It'll take me a few day to work thought everyone else's. Cheers,   +++$+++ *Ok, I've responded to your answers. It'll take me a few day to work thought everyone else's. Cheers,  [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 09:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
571678 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571676 +++$+++ 571676 +++$+++ 2007-07-05 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.183666380E09 +++$+++ I've also responded to your test at my own [[Wikipedia:Editor review\/Yllosubmarine|editor review]].  Phew!  Thanks for the work-out. :) <span style=\"font-family:verdana\"> +++$+++ : I've also responded to your test at my own [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Yllosubmarine|editor review]].  Phew!  Thanks for the work-out. :) <span style="font-family:verdana">[[User:Yllosubmarine|María]] </span><small>([[Wikipedia:Editor review/Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">críticame</span>]])</small> 13:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

284332 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-17 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.166395860E09 +++$+++ Good comment about the Linda section (what a difference a fresh pair of eyes can make). I rearranged the sentence and it makes sense now. -- +++$+++ Good comment about the Linda section (what a difference a fresh pair of eyes can make). I rearranged the sentence and it makes sense now. --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 14:51, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
284333 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284332 +++$+++ 284332 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.166409240E09 +++$+++ Well spotted! I have moved it under the 'Family life' header, which seems to make more sense (as that section is an overview). It's great to have you on board with us. -- +++$+++ :Well spotted! I have moved it under the 'Family life' header, which seems to make more sense (as that section is an overview). It's great to have you on board with us. --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 18:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
284334 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284332 +++$+++ 284333 +++$+++ 2006-12-17 21:38:00 +++$+++ 1.166420280E09 +++$+++ I have just read your comments on the Lennon talk page, and I instantly felt like giving you a [[Barnstar]]. (I think I will, at some point... :) You are a 'breath of fresh air', and I am really looking forward to us all working together. -- +++$+++ ::I have just read your comments on the Lennon talk page, and I instantly felt like giving you a [[Barnstar]]. (I think I will, at some point... :) You are a 'breath of fresh air', and I am really looking forward to us all working together. --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 21:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
284335 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284332 +++$+++ 284334 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.166432640E09 +++$+++ This is funny, but true: If you win something (and you are English) you are 'English'. If you are Scottish, Welsh, or Northern Irish, you are 'British'. It's a bugger, but such is the mentality of the Brits\/English (of which I am one, BTW) although I disagree with the idea, having a tiny little bit of Scottish ancestry myself... -- +++$+++ :::This is funny, but true: If you win something (and you are English) you are 'English'. If you are Scottish, Welsh, or Northern Irish, you are 'British'. It's a bugger, but such is the mentality of the Brits/English (of which I am one, BTW) although I disagree with the idea, having a tiny little bit of Scottish ancestry myself... --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 01:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
284336 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284332 +++$+++ 284335 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 01:11:00 +++$+++ 1.166433060E09 +++$+++ Check out [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles]]. -- +++$+++ ::::Check out [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles]]. --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 01:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

22190 +++$+++ TomStar81 +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22190 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-05 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.289011020E09 +++$+++ ...is there any chance at all that you think you will be using the [[:File:Blue Submarine -6 Screenshot.JPG]]? If so, then I am glad, if not then I would like to go ahead an have the image axed since I dislike watching the fair use images I uploaded sit on death row unnecessarily. I'll wait for your reply, but know that due to circumstances beyond my control it may be a while before I get to see your reply.  +++$+++ ...is there any chance at all that you think you will be using the [[:File:Blue Submarine -6 Screenshot.JPG]]? If so, then I am glad, if not then I would like to go ahead an have the image axed since I dislike watching the fair use images I uploaded sit on death row unnecessarily. I'll wait for your reply, but know that due to circumstances beyond my control it may be a while before I get to see your reply. [[User:TomStar81|TomStar81]] ([[User talk:TomStar81|Talk]]) 19:37, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
22191 +++$+++ TomStar81 +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22190 +++$+++ 22190 +++$+++ 2010-11-07 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.289149200E09 +++$+++ I'll take your non-reply as a no, so I'll just axe it.  +++$+++ :I'll take your non-reply as a no, so I'll just axe it. [[User:TomStar81|TomStar81]] ([[User talk:TomStar81|Talk]]) 09:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

22192 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22192 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-12 02:17:00 +++$+++ 1.292149020E09 +++$+++ I was reading the YuYu Hakusho article and noted you added the interview between Masashi Kishimoto and Yoshihiro Togashi from the fanbook. Would you happen to have found a translation of such interview? It would help to add more creation info for Naruto and some characters. Regards. +++$+++ I was reading the YuYu Hakusho article and noted you added the interview between Masashi Kishimoto and Yoshihiro Togashi from the fanbook. Would you happen to have found a translation of such interview? It would help to add more creation info for Naruto and some characters. Regards.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 02:17, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
22193 +++$+++ Tintor2 +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22192 +++$+++ 22192 +++$+++ 2010-12-12 02:35:00 +++$+++ 1.292150100E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Luckily, my original language is Spanish. +++$+++ :Thanks. Luckily, my original language is Spanish.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 02:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

284337 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284337 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-18 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.166433960E09 +++$+++ I truly, and deeply, apologise. I am absolutely not sexist, but one encounters so many on these pages. I normally write she\/he when talking about editors. I will now take the hair shirt out of the closet and wear it for 24 hours. Do I feel like a moron? Doh! -- +++$+++ I truly, and deeply, apologise. I am absolutely not sexist, but one encounters so many on these pages. I normally write she/he when talking about editors. I will now take the hair shirt out of the closet and wear it for 24 hours. Do I feel like a moron? Doh! --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 01:26, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
284338 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284337 +++$+++ 284337 +++$+++ 2006-12-18 12:16:00 +++$+++ 1.166472960E09 +++$+++ No, I'm not that sensitive (scratch, scratch) and it's good to have you working with us (scratch, scratch... :) What makes me laugh is that I should have known you were not a bloke, because you were too intelligent and reasonable on the Lennon pages (I'm not joking about this) and then you spotted stuff that none of us have ever noticed on Macca's. (Whack - ouch!... :) -- +++$+++ :No, I'm not that sensitive (scratch, scratch) and it's good to have you working with us (scratch, scratch... :) What makes me laugh is that I should have known you were not a bloke, because you were too intelligent and reasonable on the Lennon pages (I'm not joking about this) and then you spotted stuff that none of us have ever noticed on Macca's. (Whack - ouch!... :) --[[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 12:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

22194 +++$+++ MuZebot +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22194 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-06 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.294364700E09 +++$+++ [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] <small>delivered by  +++$+++ [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] <small>delivered by [[User:MuZebot|MuZebot]]</small> 17:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
22195 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22194 +++$+++ 22194 +++$+++ 2011-01-26 18:54:00 +++$+++ 1.296096840E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 18:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

284339 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-20 20:54:00 +++$+++ 1.166676840E09 +++$+++ Well, I never did, it really is very nice to meet you! Very best wishes,  +++$+++ Well, I never did, it really is very nice to meet you! Very best wishes, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 20:54, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
284340 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 21:37:00 +++$+++ 1.166679420E09 +++$+++ '''You''' can go on for as long as you like Queen! Wow, you used to go to his concerts? Oh WOW! No it wasn't Bragg, he had a really great voice Like Phil's I'll get it one of these days! I'm so pleased that your children know him, there really is hope for this world after all! Sorry this has taken so long, but I'm recovering from an accident an can't type very fast at the moment, but it's getting better! Yes, we do need him now - '''Tony Blair, find yourself an another country to be part of!''' Best wishes,  +++$+++ ::'''You''' can go on for as long as you like Queen! Wow, you used to go to his concerts? Oh WOW! No it wasn't Bragg, he had a really great voice Like Phil's I'll get it one of these days! I'm so pleased that your children know him, there really is hope for this world after all! Sorry this has taken so long, but I'm recovering from an accident an can't type very fast at the moment, but it's getting better! Yes, we do need him now - '''Tony Blair, find yourself an another country to be part of!''' Best wishes, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 21:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
284341 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-20 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.166683860E09 +++$+++ He would have made mincemeat (hamburger) out of the pair of em! I was just eating dinner and our \"prince\" was just on the news, and is bangin on about IRAN now!!!!. Yes I'd love the link, can't seem to find it. Take care,  +++$+++ :::He would have made mincemeat (hamburger) out of the pair of em! I was just eating dinner and our "prince" was just on the news, and is bangin on about IRAN now!!!!. Yes I'd love the link, can't seem to find it. Take care, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 22:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
284342 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-21 01:04:00 +++$+++ 1.166691840E09 +++$+++ Got Him! [[Harvey Andrews]].  +++$+++ ::::Got Him! [[Harvey Andrews]]. [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 01:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
284343 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284339 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-21 13:52:00 +++$+++ 1.166737920E09 +++$+++ Hi Tvoz, thanks very much for tying, no wonder I had no luck, lets hope that your husband will be able to talk him round, I'd love to see that, I've never heard him interviewed. I'm not sure, but I don't think he ever played over here, perhaps you may know? I looked for \"Hey Sandy\" on youtube, but the only Andrew's song they have is \"Soldier\", which for some strange reason will not link, it also seems to be running to fast, making his voice sound higher and by the comments left, seems sadly to have been hijacked (or misunderstood) by the Right-they never \"get\" irony, do they? You went to Kent State? I am not worthy!! Take care,  +++$+++ :::::Hi Tvoz, thanks very much for tying, no wonder I had no luck, lets hope that your husband will be able to talk him round, I'd love to see that, I've never heard him interviewed. I'm not sure, but I don't think he ever played over here, perhaps you may know? I looked for "Hey Sandy" on youtube, but the only Andrew's song they have is "Soldier", which for some strange reason will not link, it also seems to be running to fast, making his voice sound higher and by the comments left, seems sadly to have been hijacked (or misunderstood) by the Right-they never "get" irony, do they? You went to Kent State? I am not worthy!! Take care, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 13:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

22196 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22196 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-01 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.298972280E09 +++$+++ Hi there.  I have completed an initial GA review of this article.  It looks good, but there are some small issues requiring attention.  Please visit [[Talk:Mega Man 4\/GA1|the review page]] and read my review.  When you believe you have addressed my concerns please leave me a message on my talk page and I will return to the review. -  +++$+++ Hi there.  I have completed an initial GA review of this article.  It looks good, but there are some small issues requiring attention.  Please visit [[Talk:Mega Man 4/GA1|the review page]] and read my review.  When you believe you have addressed my concerns please leave me a message on my talk page and I will return to the review. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 01:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
22197 +++$+++ DustFormsWords +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22196 +++$+++ 22196 +++$+++ 2011-03-01 02:43:00 +++$+++ 1.298976180E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your edits, I have now promoted the article to Good Article status.  Congratulations!  I will start the Mega Man 6 review later today. -  +++$+++ *Thank you for your edits, I have now promoted the article to Good Article status.  Congratulations!  I will start the Mega Man 6 review later today. - [[User:DustFormsWords|DustFormsWords]] ([[User talk:DustFormsWords|talk]]) 02:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

546486 +++$+++ Mrh30 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-23 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.222206000E09 +++$+++ I've closed the discussion.  +++$+++ I've closed the discussion. [[User:Mrh30|Mrh30]] ([[User talk:Mrh30|talk]]) 14:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
546487 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546486 +++$+++ 546486 +++$+++ 2008-09-23 14:42:00 +++$+++ 1.222206120E09 +++$+++ Thanks. Well done. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Thanks. Well done. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

546488 +++$+++ Bruce1ee +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546488 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-24 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.222262940E09 +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> -- +++$+++ |} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --[[User:Bruce1ee|Bruce1ee]]<sup>[[User talk:Bruce1ee|talk]]</sup> 06:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
546489 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546488 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 09:38:00 +++$+++ 1.222274280E09 +++$+++ Thanks again for putting this out there. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::Thanks again for putting this out there. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 09:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

546490 +++$+++ Girolamo Savonarola +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546490 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-24 19:32:00 +++$+++ 1.222309920E09 +++$+++ Please don't add the Film banner to the talk pages of biographical articles; we don't cover bios - the Actors and Filmmakers workgroup of WP Biography does.  +++$+++ Please don't add the Film banner to the talk pages of biographical articles; we don't cover bios - the Actors and Filmmakers workgroup of WP Biography does. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 19:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
546491 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546490 +++$+++ 546490 +++$+++ 2008-09-24 19:35:00 +++$+++ 1.222310100E09 +++$+++ Sorry, I just noticed my mistake and was in the process of undoing those tags when you notified me. I'll take care of it. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Sorry, I just noticed my mistake and was in the process of undoing those tags when you notified me. I'll take care of it. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 19:35, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

284347 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284347 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-23 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.166945340E09 +++$+++ No, just: \"Stupid Scouse Get, GM\"! He's correct a GM is ''conferred'', but an MBE is an award you can't appoint an appointment. \"MBE award\" gets one million, one hundred & ten thousand Google hits! Cheers,  +++$+++ No, just: "Stupid Scouse Get, GM"! He's correct a GM is ''conferred'', but an MBE is an award you can't appoint an appointment. "MBE award" gets one million, one hundred & ten thousand Google hits! Cheers, [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 23:29, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
284348 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284347 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.166950920E09 +++$+++ I like your edit, I've just asked ''B Z Bod'' to have a look at it! The problem is, that an MBE is ''Awarded'' but by the token it ''is an appointment''. Him 12? I doubt it, me 10 year old baby girls are more grown up than him! One of em was putting in page numbers for Sir Sean when me shoulder was really hurting and I could hardly move. Cheers!  +++$+++ ::I like your edit, I've just asked ''B Z Bod'' to have a look at it! The problem is, that an MBE is ''Awarded'' but by the token it ''is an appointment''. Him 12? I doubt it, me 10 year old baby girls are more grown up than him! One of em was putting in page numbers for Sir Sean when me shoulder was really hurting and I could hardly move. Cheers! [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 01:02, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
284349 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284347 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 01:08:00 +++$+++ 1.166951280E09 +++$+++ I also like the edit. Mind you, if [[Paul McCartney|this]] article is going to go for FA then it will need to be resolved - enjoy Christmas, have a break, and then hunt the blessed thing down and get a definitive answer - or it will be failed. +++$+++ :::I also like the edit. Mind you, if [[Paul McCartney|this]] article is going to go for FA then it will need to be resolved - enjoy Christmas, have a break, and then hunt the blessed thing down and get a definitive answer - or it will be failed.[[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 01:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

22205 +++$+++ PresN +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22205 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-30 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.304229540E09 +++$+++ Hey, emailing me a transcript of the interview would be best, if it's not too much hassle! Thank you very much for offering! --''' +++$+++ Hey, emailing me a transcript of the interview would be best, if it's not too much hassle! Thank you very much for offering! --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue">N</span>]]''' 22:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
22206 +++$+++ PresN +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22205 +++$+++ 22205 +++$+++ 2011-05-01 01:02:00 +++$+++ 1.304236920E09 +++$+++ I have my wikipedia email set up; just click \"E-mail this user\" on my user page. --''' +++$+++ :I have my wikipedia email set up; just click "E-mail this user" on my user page. --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue">N</span>]]''' 01:02, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
22207 +++$+++ PresN +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22205 +++$+++ 22206 +++$+++ 2011-05-02 01:36:00 +++$+++ 1.304325360E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much! --''' +++$+++ ::Thank you very much! --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue">N</span>]]''' 01:36, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

284351 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284351 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-24 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.166992560E09 +++$+++ I tried it before, they always spill in transit. And me a barman, eh? Merry Chrizzmuzz.-- +++$+++ I tried it before, they always spill in transit. And me a barman, eh? Merry Chrizzmuzz.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 12:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
284352 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284351 +++$+++ 284351 +++$+++ 2006-12-24 12:45:00 +++$+++ 1.166993100E09 +++$+++ Sorry, didn't realise you was a girl. Too easy to assume everyone on wikipedia is a lad. Is that your minority status then?-- +++$+++ :Sorry, didn't realise you was a girl. Too easy to assume everyone on wikipedia is a lad. Is that your minority status then?--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 12:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

546496 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-25 19:21:00 +++$+++ 1.222395660E09 +++$+++ What I want to do eventually is to have lists for eahc of the years in Danish film in detail like we have have with e.g [[Template:CinemaofItaly]] etc.  +++$+++ What I want to do eventually is to have lists for eahc of the years in Danish film in detail like we have have with e.g [[Template:CinemaofItaly]] etc. [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 19:21, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
546497 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546496 +++$+++ 546496 +++$+++ 2008-09-25 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.222398540E09 +++$+++ I'm not sure that I see the efficacy of breaking the lists down by year at this point. For any given year, there are less than ten Danish films of notability (often much less) -- so each page will appear as a bunch of large templates with very little content. The question I ask myself is what do I use the lists for? In general, I use them to search for specific films that I think were made during a broad period of time, say the 90's or something. It is then that I want to be able to scroll down a single list, rather than clicking on page after page. For that purpose, the decade lists work well for me -- large enough to have a lot of content, but not so large that they are difficult to scroll through. Of course, I am not sure how other people use them or why they use them. And I can understand if the pages are expanded in prose that describes the year, the highs, the awards, anything notable (although there are already notes on the page, plus links to other lists and the general Cinema of Denmark article which covers a lot of that already). In other words, I am not convinced of the need to spend a lot of time on that kind of breakdown. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :I'm not sure that I see the efficacy of breaking the lists down by year at this point. For any given year, there are less than ten Danish films of notability (often much less) -- so each page will appear as a bunch of large templates with very little content. The question I ask myself is what do I use the lists for? In general, I use them to search for specific films that I think were made during a broad period of time, say the 90's or something. It is then that I want to be able to scroll down a single list, rather than clicking on page after page. For that purpose, the decade lists work well for me -- large enough to have a lot of content, but not so large that they are difficult to scroll through. Of course, I am not sure how other people use them or why they use them. And I can understand if the pages are expanded in prose that describes the year, the highs, the awards, anything notable (although there are already notes on the page, plus links to other lists and the general Cinema of Denmark article which covers a lot of that already). In other words, I am not convinced of the need to spend a lot of time on that kind of breakdown. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 20:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

284353 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-24 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.166997060E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your message, and a very Merry Christmas and happy holidays to you too.  I've had one \"White Christmas\" in my life and the rest I've spent in sunny, tropical Brisbane.   To me, a \"White Christmas\" seems kind of odd, but luckily I've grown up on an unhealthy diet of American TV and cinema, so I can buy into the whole Bing Crosby thing without stretching my imagination too far.  As a matter of fact, I have my airconditioner turned to \"Arctic blizzard\" right now, so it's kind of chilly.  I have to ask - where are you?  Wherever it is, I hope it's fun and you have a fine time. Best wishes.  +++$+++ Thank you for your message, and a very Merry Christmas and happy holidays to you too.  I've had one "White Christmas" in my life and the rest I've spent in sunny, tropical Brisbane.   To me, a "White Christmas" seems kind of odd, but luckily I've grown up on an unhealthy diet of American TV and cinema, so I can buy into the whole Bing Crosby thing without stretching my imagination too far.  As a matter of fact, I have my airconditioner turned to "Arctic blizzard" right now, so it's kind of chilly.  I have to ask - where are you?  Wherever it is, I hope it's fun and you have a fine time. Best wishes. [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] 13:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
284354 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284353 +++$+++ 284353 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 13:57:00 +++$+++ 1.167256620E09 +++$+++ New York! I would never have guessed!  I must admit I was surprised to see [[Col Joye]] mentioned on your user page.  An Australian icon (more or less) but I wonder how many people in New York have heard of him!  I dare say a lot of people in Brisbane have never heard of him either ;-)   +++$+++ :New York! I would never have guessed!  I must admit I was surprised to see [[Col Joye]] mentioned on your user page.  An Australian icon (more or less) but I wonder how many people in New York have heard of him!  I dare say a lot of people in Brisbane have never heard of him either ;-)  [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] 13:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
284355 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284353 +++$+++ 284354 +++$+++ 2006-12-27 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.167256920E09 +++$+++ And you started his page too, I notice, and that's great.   +++$+++ ::And you started his page too, I notice, and that's great.  [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] 14:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
284356 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284353 +++$+++ 284355 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.167336300E09 +++$+++ The Col Joye article looks fine to me.  It ''is'' a bit sketchy, but it's more than a stub.  It looks accurate to me, but I'm no expert.   The only major event I know of that could be added, concerns an accident he had a few years ago when he fell off his roof and landed on his head.   Fortunately he didn't live in a 10th floor apartment ;-)  The media in Australia started writing what can only be described as obituaries, but he failed to oblige.  He's fully recovered and he acted as both the headline act and MC for a major rock tour a couple of years ago. (That's an interesting article in itself and one I'll definitely do) I've seen his performance on DVD and it was very good, I must say, though I'm not a \"fan\".   I'll see what I can find and maybe add to the article.   +++$+++ :::The Col Joye article looks fine to me.  It ''is'' a bit sketchy, but it's more than a stub.  It looks accurate to me, but I'm no expert.   The only major event I know of that could be added, concerns an accident he had a few years ago when he fell off his roof and landed on his head.   Fortunately he didn't live in a 10th floor apartment ;-)  The media in Australia started writing what can only be described as obituaries, but he failed to oblige.  He's fully recovered and he acted as both the headline act and MC for a major rock tour a couple of years ago. (That's an interesting article in itself and one I'll definitely do) I've seen his performance on DVD and it was very good, I must say, though I'm not a "fan".   I'll see what I can find and maybe add to the article.  [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] 12:05, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
284357 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284353 +++$+++ 284356 +++$+++ 2006-12-28 13:18:00 +++$+++ 1.167340680E09 +++$+++ After a bit of research - he fell, not off his roof, but out of a ''tree'' and it wasn't \"a few years ago\", it was ''1990''.   I think the only bit I got right was the \"I'm no expert\" part.  +++$+++ ::::After a bit of research - he fell, not off his roof, but out of a ''tree'' and it wasn't "a few years ago", it was ''1990''.   I think the only bit I got right was the "I'm no expert" part. [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] 13:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

546498 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546498 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-25 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.222398780E09 +++$+++ Well if there are only 10 notable films a year then there is indeed no need to split. I had anticpated there would be nearer 50 notable films from each year. Perhaps the industry wasn't as big as I thought  +++$+++ Well if there are only 10 notable films a year then there is indeed no need to split. I had anticpated there would be nearer 50 notable films from each year. Perhaps the industry wasn't as big as I thought [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 20:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
546499 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546498 +++$+++ 546498 +++$+++ 2008-09-25 20:26:00 +++$+++ 1.222399560E09 +++$+++ For a small country of only 5 million people, producing several notable films per year is pretty impressive. Of course, more films are made, but merely being made does not denote notability. In reading through books on the history Danish cinema, there are plenty of films which are mentioned only in passing -- many which aren't mentioned at all -- and if these films aren't that notable in Danish books, they are hardly going to be notable on the English WP. I think if the Danish film section hits 500-700 film articles for the past century, that would be amazing. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :For a small country of only 5 million people, producing several notable films per year is pretty impressive. Of course, more films are made, but merely being made does not denote notability. In reading through books on the history Danish cinema, there are plenty of films which are mentioned only in passing -- many which aren't mentioned at all -- and if these films aren't that notable in Danish books, they are hardly going to be notable on the English WP. I think if the Danish film section hits 500-700 film articles for the past century, that would be amazing. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 20:26, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

546501 +++$+++ Lugnuts +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546501 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-26 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.222483200E09 +++$+++ Will do - I'll be working on this over the next few days. ''' +++$+++ Will do - I'll be working on this over the next few days. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Lugnuts|talk]]) 19:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
546502 +++$+++ Lugnuts +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546501 +++$+++ 546501 +++$+++ 2008-09-26 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.222485240E09 +++$+++ Nice work and thanks for your earlier comments! ''' +++$+++ :Nice work and thanks for your earlier comments! '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Lugnuts|talk]]) 20:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

546503 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-26 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.222490340E09 +++$+++ One thing though, I;m sure not why a large number of those films have been de-linked from her article. WHat is the criteria for blanking them out? What constitutes notability? If the film is well liked or not? FOr instance Familien Olsen, the 1940 film seems to have some notability. Directed by Lau Lauritzen and Alice O'Fredericks, both notable directors, screenwriteen by Fleming Lynge who was a noted screenwriter and the film stars both Osvald Helmuth and Ib Sch\xf8nberg who was noted actors??  +++$+++ One thing though, I;m sure not why a large number of those films have been de-linked from her article. WHat is the criteria for blanking them out? What constitutes notability? If the film is well liked or not? FOr instance Familien Olsen, the 1940 film seems to have some notability. Directed by Lau Lauritzen and Alice O'Fredericks, both notable directors, screenwriteen by Fleming Lynge who was a noted screenwriter and the film stars both Osvald Helmuth and Ib Schønberg who was noted actors?? [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 21:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
546504 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546503 +++$+++ 546503 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 14:31:00 +++$+++ 1.222551060E09 +++$+++ Hi Blofeld. I had blacked out many of the films of Alice O'Fredericks on her webpage and had left red-linked only the ones which I felt certain that I could easily defend as notable. Although she was a wonderful and important Danish director, many of her films are considered fairly pedestrian and aren't even mentioned in the historical literature (other than by name, synopsis and cast list). Her important works were really 1: ''Far til Fire'' (and the sequels, although a case could be made to merge them all into one article), 2: ''The Red Horses'' (and the other subsequent Morten Korch films), and 3: ''The Burning Question'' & ''We Meet at Tove's'' which were early women's rights films. As you say, a film like ''Familien Olsen'' had Ib Sch\xf8nberg and Osvald Helmuth, not to mention Jon Iversen, but it is much harder to find any discussion of the film in sources which could build it's notability -- rather than simply saying there were famous peope in it. Given the recent efforts to mass delete the non-notable films, I figured it was better to concentrate my efforts on films which are without doubt important, notable and are readily discussed in books and journals -- of which there are a few hundred -- rather than spend a lot of time defending the more marginal films. I figure we can always work back into the smaller films later. I hope all this blather makes sense. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Hi Blofeld. I had blacked out many of the films of Alice O'Fredericks on her webpage and had left red-linked only the ones which I felt certain that I could easily defend as notable. Although she was a wonderful and important Danish director, many of her films are considered fairly pedestrian and aren't even mentioned in the historical literature (other than by name, synopsis and cast list). Her important works were really 1: ''Far til Fire'' (and the sequels, although a case could be made to merge them all into one article), 2: ''The Red Horses'' (and the other subsequent Morten Korch films), and 3: ''The Burning Question'' & ''We Meet at Tove's'' which were early women's rights films. As you say, a film like ''Familien Olsen'' had Ib Schønberg and Osvald Helmuth, not to mention Jon Iversen, but it is much harder to find any discussion of the film in sources which could build it's notability -- rather than simply saying there were famous peope in it. Given the recent efforts to mass delete the non-notable films, I figured it was better to concentrate my efforts on films which are without doubt important, notable and are readily discussed in books and journals -- of which there are a few hundred -- rather than spend a lot of time defending the more marginal films. I figure we can always work back into the smaller films later. I hope all this blather makes sense. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:31, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
546505 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546503 +++$+++ 546504 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 14:43:00 +++$+++ 1.222551780E09 +++$+++ I understand, but I guarantee that none of the films would be deleted. I';m not sure if any mass film deletions have ever been accomplished on here or are done by completely amateur or independent filmmakers. All I can think of are short films or silent films or z films which have no mainstream claims to notability whatsoever. The majority of ALice's feature films appear to meet all of our requirements. Howveer I agree that the ones mentioned in books ar elikely to be the most significant. The thing though is that many of the plots etc exist on danish film websites so many people would argue that wikipedia is better for having a basic article than not. The reason why I think it is important to cover the films is also because it ties a number of actors and directors together and infrastructually improves the conneciton of danish cinema in the filmographies etc. Eventually I would hope that most of the danish films and actors will be of a high standard. If you can concentrate on devleoping the ones in books to a high standard, this would be aweseome. Which ever way we look at it, the subject on wikipedia is enhancing considerably  +++$+++ ::I understand, but I guarantee that none of the films would be deleted. I';m not sure if any mass film deletions have ever been accomplished on here or are done by completely amateur or independent filmmakers. All I can think of are short films or silent films or z films which have no mainstream claims to notability whatsoever. The majority of ALice's feature films appear to meet all of our requirements. Howveer I agree that the ones mentioned in books ar elikely to be the most significant. The thing though is that many of the plots etc exist on danish film websites so many people would argue that wikipedia is better for having a basic article than not. The reason why I think it is important to cover the films is also because it ties a number of actors and directors together and infrastructually improves the conneciton of danish cinema in the filmographies etc. Eventually I would hope that most of the danish films and actors will be of a high standard. If you can concentrate on devleoping the ones in books to a high standard, this would be aweseome. Which ever way we look at it, the subject on wikipedia is enhancing considerably [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 14:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
546506 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546503 +++$+++ 546505 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 14:59:00 +++$+++ 1.222552740E09 +++$+++ Your point is well-taken -- that the entire subject of cinema can be strengthened by inclusion of all the sourced material we can put into it. Some people lay out the bricks, other people fill in the mortar. All I can say is: Go for it. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Your point is well-taken -- that the entire subject of cinema can be strengthened by inclusion of all the sourced material we can put into it. Some people lay out the bricks, other people fill in the mortar. All I can say is: Go for it. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
546507 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546503 +++$+++ 546506 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.222552860E09 +++$+++ Cool analogy. What we want though eventually is a complete skyscraper!!  +++$+++ ::::Cool analogy. What we want though eventually is a complete skyscraper!! [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 15:01, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
546508 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546503 +++$+++ 546506 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.222554240E09 +++$+++ The best thing to do would be to expand all of the actor biography articles we have. Anyway to date i must have started well over 50 actor articles including [[Osvald Helmuth ]] and [[Jon Iversen]]!!. We recent drive this afternoon fills in a lot of red links. ANything you can do to translate from danish to expand any of the danish actor articles would be an added bonus! +++$+++ ::::The best thing to do would be to expand all of the actor biography articles we have. Anyway to date i must have started well over 50 actor articles including [[Osvald Helmuth ]] and [[Jon Iversen]]!!. We recent drive this afternoon fills in a lot of red links. ANything you can do to translate from danish to expand any of the danish actor articles would be an added bonus![[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 15:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

22220 +++$+++ GamerPro64 +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22220 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-09 22:47:00 +++$+++ 1.310276820E09 +++$+++ Excuse me Hibana. I have been working on Pilotwings to try to make it a Good Article and I noticed that you made the most edits to it. Do you think that it would be ready for GAN?  +++$+++ Excuse me Hibana. I have been working on Pilotwings to try to make it a Good Article and I noticed that you made the most edits to it. Do you think that it would be ready for GAN? [[User talk:GamerPro64|<font color="red">GamerPro64</font>]] 22:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
22221 +++$+++ GamerPro64 +++$+++ Hibana +++$+++ 22220 +++$+++ 22220 +++$+++ 2011-07-10 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.310284080E09 +++$+++ I can find someone to copyedit. When I put it up for GAN, do you want to be a co-nominee?  +++$+++ :I can find someone to copyedit. When I put it up for GAN, do you want to be a co-nominee? [[User talk:GamerPro64|<font color="red">GamerPro64</font>]] 00:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

546509 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546509 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-26 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.222489920E09 +++$+++ Hi. Yes I created that template and intended adding them until Lugnuts kindly helped out. I;ve stubbed a few actors. Please could you expand [[Else H\xf8jgaard]] as asoon as you can? It just had a speedy delete tag placed on it. It has a full bio in Danish at the official site  +++$+++ Hi. Yes I created that template and intended adding them until Lugnuts kindly helped out. I;ve stubbed a few actors. Please could you expand [[Else Højgaard]] as asoon as you can? It just had a speedy delete tag placed on it. It has a full bio in Danish at the official site [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 21:32, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
546510 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546509 +++$+++ 546509 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 09:46:00 +++$+++ 1.222533960E09 +++$+++ {{done}} OK, I expanded the [[Else H\xf8jgaard]] article. She should have no problems. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :{{done}} OK, I expanded the [[Else Højgaard]] article. She should have no problems. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 09:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
546511 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546509 +++$+++ 546510 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 11:56:00 +++$+++ 1.222541760E09 +++$+++ That is wonderful work. Amazing!! Well done! +++$+++ ::That is wonderful work. Amazing!! Well done![[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 11:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
546512 +++$+++ Blofeld of SPECTRE +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546509 +++$+++ 546510 +++$+++ 2008-09-27 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.222553160E09 +++$+++ You should propose it for a DYK. It would be good to get some DYK's under our belt for the Nordic task force for Danish actors and films +++$+++ ::You should propose it for a DYK. It would be good to get some DYK's under our belt for the Nordic task force for Danish actors and films[[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 15:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

284368 +++$+++ Equinox137 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284368 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-01 10:59:00 +++$+++ 1.167677940E09 +++$+++ Hey boss...I'm gonna call it a night (morning).  Good debating you and I'm glad is hasn't gotten out of hand.  +++$+++ Hey boss...I'm gonna call it a night (morning).  Good debating you and I'm glad is hasn't gotten out of hand. [[User:Equinox137|Equinox137]] 10:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
284369 +++$+++ Equinox137 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284368 +++$+++ 284368 +++$+++ 2007-01-06 09:34:00 +++$+++ 1.168104840E09 +++$+++ I've made some more edits to KS after removing the NPOV tag.  They're pretty minor to me, but please check them over and let me know if you disagree with any of them.  +++$+++ :I've made some more edits to KS after removing the NPOV tag.  They're pretty minor to me, but please check them over and let me know if you disagree with any of them. [[User:Equinox137|Equinox137]] 09:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

284370 +++$+++ Specter01010 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284370 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-02 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.167725460E09 +++$+++ Hey Tvoz, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page.  Appreciate the help.  -- +++$+++ Hey Tvoz, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page.  Appreciate the help.  --[[User:Specter01010|Specter01010]] 00:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
284371 +++$+++ Specter01010 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284370 +++$+++ 284370 +++$+++ 2007-01-02 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.167730080E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I did WHOIS on 81.233.34.245, and by default, the varying IPs all came from Stockholm, Sweden.  In this case, if 81.233.34.245 was blocked, users whom have\/will use the IP address won't be able to contribute to Wikipedia.  If the user does continue to vandalize, would it constitute a \"softblock?\" -- +++$+++ :Yeah, I did WHOIS on 81.233.34.245, and by default, the varying IPs all came from Stockholm, Sweden.  In this case, if 81.233.34.245 was blocked, users whom have/will use the IP address won't be able to contribute to Wikipedia.  If the user does continue to vandalize, would it constitute a "softblock?" --[[User:Specter01010|Specter01010]] 01:28, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

284372 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284372 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-04 01:14:00 +++$+++ 1.167902040E09 +++$+++ Promise - this has nothing whatsoever to do with anything on Wikipedia - just something I can't remember and thought an old Alex Bennett fan might recall ....  do you remember which NYC radio dj\/talk show guy used to say \"Namaste\" at the end of his show?  This is driving me nuts - was it Leon Lewis?    Thanks, if you recall.  Best wishes <strong> +++$+++ Promise - this has nothing whatsoever to do with anything on Wikipedia - just something I can't remember and thought an old Alex Bennett fan might recall ....  do you remember which NYC radio dj/talk show guy used to say "Namaste" at the end of his show?  This is driving me nuts - was it Leon Lewis?    Thanks, if you recall.  Best wishes <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small> [[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 01:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
284373 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284372 +++$+++ 284372 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 04:53:00 +++$+++ 1.167915180E09 +++$+++ It was definitely a WMCA jock, and it was late 1960s, but I'd hesitate to say which. I thought Leon Lewis was the one who finished his show with a longish rap the tail end of which was \"\u2026and you don't eat chicken on Sundays.\" -  +++$+++ : It was definitely a WMCA jock, and it was late 1960s, but I'd hesitate to say which. I thought Leon Lewis was the one who finished his show with a longish rap the tail end of which was "…and you don't eat chicken on Sundays." - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 04:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

22231 +++$+++ Scottandrewhutchins +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22231 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-30 02:15:00 +++$+++ 1.301476500E09 +++$+++ When my block was made in a direct violation of Wikipedia policy, it is most certainly a valid reason for objection, and I must insist that you restore the list that you deleted in my absence.  The redlinks were created back in the day when ever Masters of the Universe character, for example, had an entry.  Because policy on fictional characters is different now, it does not mean that the characters should not even appear in a list.-- +++$+++ When my block was made in a direct violation of Wikipedia policy, it is most certainly a valid reason for objection, and I must insist that you restore the list that you deleted in my absence.  The redlinks were created back in the day when ever Masters of the Universe character, for example, had an entry.  Because policy on fictional characters is different now, it does not mean that the characters should not even appear in a list.--[[User:Scottandrewhutchins|Scottandrewhutchins]] ([[User talk:Scottandrewhutchins|talk]]) 02:15, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
22232 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22231 +++$+++ 22231 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 04:22:00 +++$+++ 1.301484120E09 +++$+++ It kinda does actually.  Can you point to a policy that clearly supports having long meaningless lists of non-notable characters?  Because I can point to a number of policies that would (i.e. not having long meaningless list, GNG, etc.).  Not to mention I started doing what I was doing well before you were blocked, and you didn't say a word.  I could have even deleted all of the list in one fell swoop using BOLD.  When you are blocked, you forfeit the right to participate in any discussions for the duration.  I took a look at your block, and unblock requests were denied four or five times, so I doubt that it was made wrongfully.  In addition, you talk about it being a \"work in progess\"...the only person who had added any meaningful amount of content was me.  If you still think I have acted in error, get another set of eyes on this...I'm reasonably sure they'll agree with me. '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :It kinda does actually.  Can you point to a policy that clearly supports having long meaningless lists of non-notable characters?  Because I can point to a number of policies that would (i.e. not having long meaningless list, GNG, etc.).  Not to mention I started doing what I was doing well before you were blocked, and you didn't say a word.  I could have even deleted all of the list in one fell swoop using BOLD.  When you are blocked, you forfeit the right to participate in any discussions for the duration.  I took a look at your block, and unblock requests were denied four or five times, so I doubt that it was made wrongfully.  In addition, you talk about it being a "work in progess"...the only person who had added any meaningful amount of content was me.  If you still think I have acted in error, get another set of eyes on this...I'm reasonably sure they'll agree with me. '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#3A003A">Pur</font><font color="#800080">ple</font>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#991C99">back</font><font color="#CC33CC">pack</font><font color="gold">89</font>]]</font>'''  04:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
22233 +++$+++ Scottandrewhutchins +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22231 +++$+++ 22232 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 17:27:00 +++$+++ 1.301531220E09 +++$+++ I didn't contract the arbitration committee about you.  I contacted them about [[User:toddst1]], whose stated reason for blocking me was [[WP:EL]], when there was nothing in those guidelines that applied to the situation. It's only relevant here because it's the reason that I didn't stop you. -- +++$+++ ::I didn't contract the arbitration committee about you.  I contacted them about [[User:toddst1]], whose stated reason for blocking me was [[WP:EL]], when there was nothing in those guidelines that applied to the situation. It's only relevant here because it's the reason that I didn't stop you. --[[User:Scottandrewhutchins|Scottandrewhutchins]] ([[User talk:Scottandrewhutchins|talk]]) 17:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
22234 +++$+++ Scottandrewhutchins +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22231 +++$+++ 22233 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.301531460E09 +++$+++ I'm not asking for lists of non-notable characters.  The aforementioned Masters of the Universe characters are still on Wikipedia, just not each with their own articles. -- +++$+++ :::I'm not asking for lists of non-notable characters.  The aforementioned Masters of the Universe characters are still on Wikipedia, just not each with their own articles. --[[User:Scottandrewhutchins|Scottandrewhutchins]] ([[User talk:Scottandrewhutchins|talk]]) 17:31, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
22235 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22231 +++$+++ 22234 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.301551320E09 +++$+++ Yes you are, kinda.  All the characters who are one the lists but don't or won't have short written blurbs are non-notable.  Also, two things about the Masters of the Universe list:  a) It doesn't just list them straight.  It has a one-to-two sentence blurb about each one; b) It's the exception rather than the rule. '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ ::::Yes you are, kinda.  All the characters who are one the lists but don't or won't have short written blurbs are non-notable.  Also, two things about the Masters of the Universe list:  a) It doesn't just list them straight.  It has a one-to-two sentence blurb about each one; b) It's the exception rather than the rule. '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#3A003A">Pur</font><font color="#800080">ple</font>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#991C99">back</font><font color="#CC33CC">pack</font><font color="gold">89</font>]]</font>'''  23:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
22236 +++$+++ Scottandrewhutchins +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22231 +++$+++ 22235 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.301695260E09 +++$+++ What part of \"work in progress\" do you not understand?  These things take time, and you made extra work for me with your disruptive edits.  the request was made on arbcom-l.  Shell Kinney wrote back to say that it was pending on March 7, but did not provide a number. -- +++$+++ :::::What part of "work in progress" do you not understand?  These things take time, and you made extra work for me with your disruptive edits.  the request was made on arbcom-l.  Shell Kinney wrote back to say that it was pending on March 7, but did not provide a number. --[[User:Scottandrewhutchins|Scottandrewhutchins]] ([[User talk:Scottandrewhutchins|talk]]) 15:01, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
22237 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22231 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 16:48:00 +++$+++ 1.301701680E09 +++$+++ This clearly was not a work in progress.  Nobody had edited the page in months, no under construction template, just a list of non-descript, non-notable redlinks that absolutely had to go.  The only person who had added a meaningful amount of content but me.  I am unfortunately sensing a tinge of [[WP:OWN|ownership]] in your tone.  My edits were not disruptive, but if if you still think they are, start an ANI or RFC thread about it '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::::::This clearly was not a work in progress.  Nobody had edited the page in months, no under construction template, just a list of non-descript, non-notable redlinks that absolutely had to go.  The only person who had added a meaningful amount of content but me.  I am unfortunately sensing a tinge of [[WP:OWN|ownership]] in your tone.  My edits were not disruptive, but if if you still think they are, start an ANI or RFC thread about it '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#3A003A">Pur</font><font color="#800080">ple</font>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#991C99">back</font><font color="#CC33CC">pack</font><font color="gold">89</font>]]</font>'''  16:48, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
22238 +++$+++ Scottandrewhutchins +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22231 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-01 17:03:00 +++$+++ 1.301702580E09 +++$+++ Your edits were disruptive.  The reason you saw a bunch of redlinks is until this came under debate, I had been creating articles.  Now that the policy has been clarified, there will be blurbs if you give me time to make them.-- +++$+++ ::::::::Your edits were disruptive.  The reason you saw a bunch of redlinks is until this came under debate, I had been creating articles.  Now that the policy has been clarified, there will be blurbs if you give me time to make them.--[[User:Scottandrewhutchins|Scottandrewhutchins]] ([[User talk:Scottandrewhutchins|talk]]) 17:03, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

47396 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47396 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-15 06:05:00 +++$+++ 1.221483900E09 +++$+++ Do you know when that rule about you must have the possibility of checkmate if the opponent's time runs out to win on time?  My guess is that it was in the 1992 FIDE changes, but I have nothing to back that up.  Also, same for USCF's \"insufficient losing chances\" in the same situation.  +++$+++ Do you know when that rule about you must have the possibility of checkmate if the opponent's time runs out to win on time?  My guess is that it was in the 1992 FIDE changes, but I have nothing to back that up.  Also, same for USCF's "insufficient losing chances" in the same situation. [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 06:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
47397 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47396 +++$+++ 47396 +++$+++ 2008-09-15 12:52:00 +++$+++ 1.221508320E09 +++$+++ This isn't very important, so don't spend a lot of time on it.   +++$+++ : This isn't very important, so don't spend a lot of time on it.  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 12:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

284379 +++$+++ Mrmaroon25 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284379 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-04 22:12:00 +++$+++ 1.167977520E09 +++$+++ Hey - I noticed that you'd reverted my additions to the [[Obama]] article referring to his supposed decision to run for president for the reason that they could be construed as POV.  In reading the article, I was initially hesitant to post it on Wikipedia because of the nature of the topic and the fact that no major news networks had picked up the story nearly twenty-four hours after its release.  Nevertheless, I think that the Sun Times is a fairly reputable source and was wondering what about the article was POV - besides of course, the columnists opinions.  I think the wording I quoted in the article was particularly \"fact-laden\".  However, I'm still open to hearing your reasoning and I'll leave the article as it is for now.  Thanks :),  +++$+++ Hey - I noticed that you'd reverted my additions to the [[Obama]] article referring to his supposed decision to run for president for the reason that they could be construed as POV.  In reading the article, I was initially hesitant to post it on Wikipedia because of the nature of the topic and the fact that no major news networks had picked up the story nearly twenty-four hours after its release.  Nevertheless, I think that the Sun Times is a fairly reputable source and was wondering what about the article was POV - besides of course, the columnists opinions.  I think the wording I quoted in the article was particularly "fact-laden".  However, I'm still open to hearing your reasoning and I'll leave the article as it is for now.  Thanks :), [[User:Mrmaroon25|Mrmaroon25]] 22:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
284380 +++$+++ Mrmaroon25 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284379 +++$+++ 284379 +++$+++ 2007-01-04 22:30:00 +++$+++ 1.167978600E09 +++$+++ Well, as you said, the link does ''not'' work, which I assure you was not the case when I posted the reference.  So anyway, even if the article was NPOV, it doesn't matter anymore because it's not there.  Thanks for the clarification!  +++$+++ :Well, as you said, the link does ''not'' work, which I assure you was not the case when I posted the reference.  So anyway, even if the article was NPOV, it doesn't matter anymore because it's not there.  Thanks for the clarification! [[User:Mrmaroon25|Mrmaroon25]] 22:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
284381 +++$+++ Mrmaroon25 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284379 +++$+++ 284380 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 07:02:00 +++$+++ 1.168009320E09 +++$+++ Just found this - would it qualify?  [http:\/\/www.nbc5.com\/politics\/10665267\/detail.html Obama looks ready to run]  +++$+++ ::Just found this - would it qualify?  [http://www.nbc5.com/politics/10665267/detail.html Obama looks ready to run] [[User:Mrmaroon25|Mrmaroon25]] 07:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
284382 +++$+++ Mrmaroon25 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284379 +++$+++ 284381 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.168011000E09 +++$+++ Absolutely.  +++$+++ :::Absolutely. [[User:Mrmaroon25|Mrmaroon25]] 07:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
284383 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284379 +++$+++ 284379 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.168046760E09 +++$+++ I'll get out Cynthia's\/Spitz's book tonight and start to add stuff about their (fairly miserable at times) marriage.  +++$+++ :I'll get out Cynthia's/Spitz's book tonight and start to add stuff about their (fairly miserable at times) marriage. [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 17:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
284384 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284379 +++$+++ 284383 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 20:34:00 +++$+++ 1.168058040E09 +++$+++ Look at the Macca history talk pages, and you will see that me and my pal Vera, Chuck and Dave seriously fell out with Kingboyk about how the Macca page is now, with us both wanting it to be chronological. We finally came around to realise that subjects are dealt with in sections (Kingboyk is an admin, after all, and has worked on a lot of FA articles). Anyway, we got up, dusted ourselves off and shook hands like the gentlemen we are. I now doff my cap to the bosses upstairs, and work on the articles as requested, which shows my working class roots, and my previous job as a percussionist... :)  +++$+++ ::Look at the Macca history talk pages, and you will see that me and my pal Vera, Chuck and Dave seriously fell out with Kingboyk about how the Macca page is now, with us both wanting it to be chronological. We finally came around to realise that subjects are dealt with in sections (Kingboyk is an admin, after all, and has worked on a lot of FA articles). Anyway, we got up, dusted ourselves off and shook hands like the gentlemen we are. I now doff my cap to the bosses upstairs, and work on the articles as requested, which shows my working class roots, and my previous job as a percussionist... :) [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 20:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
284385 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284379 +++$+++ 284384 +++$+++ 2007-01-05 21:22:00 +++$+++ 1.168060920E09 +++$+++ I've got it! Slip it in the 'Memorials and tributes' section (said the bishop to the actress :). It deserves to be in there, at least. [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 21:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC) I did it...  +++$+++ :::I've got it! Slip it in the 'Memorials and tributes' section (said the bishop to the actress :). It deserves to be in there, at least. [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 21:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC) I did it... [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 21:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

546524 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546524 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-16 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.224224640E09 +++$+++ And on a side note, I was unaware til I hit your page, that my buddy Joe Gatt has an article on Wiki. Don't tell H&T.. (chuckle) as Joe has a lot less notability than do I. What a world. Anyways, your input as requested above would be much appreciated. ''' +++$+++ And on a side note, I was unaware til I hit your page, that my buddy Joe Gatt has an article on Wiki. Don't tell H&T.. (chuckle) as Joe has a lot less notability than do I. What a world. Anyways, your input as requested above would be much appreciated. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 23:24, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
546525 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546524 +++$+++ 546524 +++$+++ 2008-10-17 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.224280200E09 +++$+++ By the way, I enjoyed the web interview you cited -- you're a funny personable guy. So don't sweat the Wikidrama. Just walk softly and carry a big schtick. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :By the way, I enjoyed the web interview you cited -- you're a funny personable guy. So don't sweat the Wikidrama. Just walk softly and carry a big schtick. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
546526 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546524 +++$+++ 546525 +++$+++ 2008-10-17 16:16:00 +++$+++ 1.224285360E09 +++$+++ Thank you much. And yes, I agree with trying to seperate myself from the situation. I have been preparing for a deletion and have asked for input as you know... and your own view on the situation is much as others have advised and what I have myself concluded. A DRV should be short, and to the point. If one needs to be done, it should not be done by me. As you know, I have been active in AfD discussions for months, and have defended or saved other articles. So if I squint one eye and step back and look at the history of this article as if as an outsider, the whole deconstruction prior to nominating has a distinct smell of fish. But it does seem there are a few editors who want the article, and that speaks volumes. Keep laughing and keep smiling. We will meet again at other AfD discussions. Best hopes, ''' +++$+++ ::Thank you much. And yes, I agree with trying to seperate myself from the situation. I have been preparing for a deletion and have asked for input as you know... and your own view on the situation is much as others have advised and what I have myself concluded. A DRV should be short, and to the point. If one needs to be done, it should not be done by me. As you know, I have been active in AfD discussions for months, and have defended or saved other articles. So if I squint one eye and step back and look at the history of this article as if as an outsider, the whole deconstruction prior to nominating has a distinct smell of fish. But it does seem there are a few editors who want the article, and that speaks volumes. Keep laughing and keep smiling. We will meet again at other AfD discussions. Best hopes, '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 16:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

546527 +++$+++ SimonLyall +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546527 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-19 10:19:00 +++$+++ 1.224436740E09 +++$+++ The page [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting\/New Zealand]] already exists and the Ruth Crisp AFD is on it. -  +++$+++ The page [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/New Zealand]] already exists and the Ruth Crisp AFD is on it. - [[User:SimonLyall|SimonLyall]] ([[User talk:SimonLyall|talk]]) 10:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
546528 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546527 +++$+++ 546527 +++$+++ 2008-10-19 10:31:00 +++$+++ 1.224437460E09 +++$+++ Okay. Thanks. I also placed a courtesy notice on the originating author's talk page. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Okay. Thanks. I also placed a courtesy notice on the originating author's talk page. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 10:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

22240 +++$+++ Killervogel5 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22240 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-30 10:46:00 +++$+++ 1.301507160E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_Philadelphia_Phillies_Opening_Day_starting_pitchers&curid=21453484&diff=421446328&oldid=402715035 This sarcastic edit summary] may have been construed by some editors as offensive, and was certainly unnecessary. For your information, there were no images of Halladay in a Phillies uniform when that article was updated to include his image. The quality of that Phillies image is poor anyway. The uniform of the player, in the grand scheme, doesn't really matter; what matters is effectively illustrating the article with an image of the player. &mdash;  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Philadelphia_Phillies_Opening_Day_starting_pitchers&curid=21453484&diff=421446328&oldid=402715035 This sarcastic edit summary] may have been construed by some editors as offensive, and was certainly unnecessary. For your information, there were no images of Halladay in a Phillies uniform when that article was updated to include his image. The quality of that Phillies image is poor anyway. The uniform of the player, in the grand scheme, doesn't really matter; what matters is effectively illustrating the article with an image of the player. &mdash; [[User:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#B71234">'''KV5'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#00338d">Talk</span>]] •  10:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
22241 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22240 +++$+++ 22240 +++$+++ 2011-03-30 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.301524080E09 +++$+++ Live a little, OK?  I doubt anyone found that offensive.  As an experience editor, I believe that a featured article, as the Phillies starters is, needs to have accurate representations of its subjects, and a picture of Halladay in a Blue Jays uniform isn't accurate if one in a Phillies uniform is available '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :Live a little, OK?  I doubt anyone found that offensive.  As an experience editor, I believe that a featured article, as the Phillies starters is, needs to have accurate representations of its subjects, and a picture of Halladay in a Blue Jays uniform isn't accurate if one in a Phillies uniform is available '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#3A003A">Pur</font><font color="#800080">ple</font>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#991C99">back</font><font color="#CC33CC">pack</font><font color="gold">89</font>]]</font>'''  15:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
22242 +++$+++ Killervogel5 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22240 +++$+++ 22241 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.301558100E09 +++$+++ I found it mildly offensive, but that's beside the point. What's not accurate about showing a picture of a pitcher when the caption is about the pitcher? While I see no reason to change the Halladay picture back, no one can deny that the Blue Jays picture is off the quality scale when compared to the Phillies image, which has been heavily doctored and is extremely grainy. &mdash;  +++$+++ ::I found it mildly offensive, but that's beside the point. What's not accurate about showing a picture of a pitcher when the caption is about the pitcher? While I see no reason to change the Halladay picture back, no one can deny that the Blue Jays picture is off the quality scale when compared to the Phillies image, which has been heavily doctored and is extremely grainy. &mdash; [[User:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#B71234">'''KV5'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#00338d">Talk</span>]] •  00:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
22243 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22240 +++$+++ 22242 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 01:06:00 +++$+++ 1.301558760E09 +++$+++ I think we can agree on one thing: we need better pictures of Halladay as a Philly.  PS: Don't forget to change the caption when Halladay starts 2011 Opening Day '''<font face=\"Verdana\"> +++$+++ :::I think we can agree on one thing: we need better pictures of Halladay as a Philly.  PS: Don't forget to change the caption when Halladay starts 2011 Opening Day '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#3A003A">Pur</font><font color="#800080">ple</font>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#991C99">back</font><font color="#CC33CC">pack</font><font color="gold">89</font>]]</font>'''  01:06, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
22244 +++$+++ Killervogel5 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22240 +++$+++ 22243 +++$+++ 2011-03-31 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.301595300E09 +++$+++ True - and I always do it unless someone beats me to it. Cheers! &mdash;  +++$+++ ::::True - and I always do it unless someone beats me to it. Cheers! &mdash; [[User:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#B71234">'''KV5'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#00338d">Talk</span>]] •  11:15, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

546529 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546529 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-20 05:10:00 +++$+++ 1.224504600E09 +++$+++ Found the Sitges source that positively verifies the film's screening. Have just begun a MAJOR sandblasting of the article to make it encyclopdic. And advice, assistance would be greatly appreciated. ''' +++$+++ Found the Sitges source that positively verifies the film's screening. Have just begun a MAJOR sandblasting of the article to make it encyclopdic. And advice, assistance would be greatly appreciated. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 05:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
546530 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546529 +++$+++ 546529 +++$+++ 2008-10-20 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.224509460E09 +++$+++ My bad... the page I found was for Sitges 2003, but not Sitges Fantasy Film Festival December 2003. I messed up a translation when I had written before. My bad. In the meanwhile... the article is much sandblasted, and slightly better sources. More yet to do, but its time for bed. More tomorrow. The 3 MUFF awards can at least be added in the interim. ''' +++$+++ :My bad... the page I found was for Sitges 2003, but not Sitges Fantasy Film Festival December 2003. I messed up a translation when I had written before. My bad. In the meanwhile... the article is much sandblasted, and slightly better sources. More yet to do, but its time for bed. More tomorrow. The 3 MUFF awards can at least be added in the interim. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 06:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
546531 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546529 +++$+++ 546530 +++$+++ 2008-10-20 11:22:00 +++$+++ 1.224526920E09 +++$+++ Michael, I can appreciate your effort to establish notability for this film -- but I think you might have forgotten what the term \"coverage\" means in this context. As stated under [[WP:FILM#General principles]] and defined under [[WP:GNG]], coverage excludes all self-submitted websites, blogs, press releases, etc. As such, there is not one single solitary reference in that article which qualifies as coverage. None. Although Screen Australia looks impressive, the only info there was submitted by the filmmakers themselves by using the website's \"Submit Your Film Here\" button. ([[http:\/\/www.afc.gov.au\/filmsandawards\/submit.aspx check it out]]) Most any semi-pro filmmaker (or even amateur) could add their film to the website. It doesn't qualify as coverage -- and certainly doesn't establish any notability. As far as the MUFF festival awards -- minor awards at a very minor film festival. Screen Australia doesn't even include MUFF among the listed [[http:\/\/www.afc.gov.au\/marketingyourfilm\/fesdir\/all_18.aspx Australian film festivals]]. In fact, any articles I find about the 2003 MUFF only mention Bullet in the Arse in passing when talking about the glut of [http:\/\/www.urbancinefile.com.au\/home\/view.asp?a=7633&s=Features local amateurish B-movies] and the general lousy schlock quality of the films. And these are by Indie film guys. As I said, I can appreciate your attempts to salvage small indie film articles. But this one? I think you're trying to sow a silk purse here. There are too many which actually deserve that effort. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::Michael, I can appreciate your effort to establish notability for this film -- but I think you might have forgotten what the term "coverage" means in this context. As stated under [[WP:FILM#General principles]] and defined under [[WP:GNG]], coverage excludes all self-submitted websites, blogs, press releases, etc. As such, there is not one single solitary reference in that article which qualifies as coverage. None. Although Screen Australia looks impressive, the only info there was submitted by the filmmakers themselves by using the website's "Submit Your Film Here" button. ([[http://www.afc.gov.au/filmsandawards/submit.aspx check it out]]) Most any semi-pro filmmaker (or even amateur) could add their film to the website. It doesn't qualify as coverage -- and certainly doesn't establish any notability. As far as the MUFF festival awards -- minor awards at a very minor film festival. Screen Australia doesn't even include MUFF among the listed [[http://www.afc.gov.au/marketingyourfilm/fesdir/all_18.aspx Australian film festivals]]. In fact, any articles I find about the 2003 MUFF only mention Bullet in the Arse in passing when talking about the glut of [http://www.urbancinefile.com.au/home/view.asp?a=7633&s=Features local amateurish B-movies] and the general lousy schlock quality of the films. And these are by Indie film guys. As I said, I can appreciate your attempts to salvage small indie film articles. But this one? I think you're trying to sow a silk purse here. There are too many which actually deserve that effort. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 11:22, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
546532 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546529 +++$+++ 546531 +++$+++ 2008-10-20 15:15:00 +++$+++ 1.224540900E09 +++$+++ No problem. Indeed, the article was so very long, my beginning to cut its fat was a good exercize in editing. It is a short film that one awards at a local festival. Now Sitges might have been nice to add... but there has been no coverage elsewhere.... even trivial. And I have been looking. Sometimes a shiney stone is just a shiney stone, and not a dianond. ''' +++$+++ :::No problem. Indeed, the article was so very long, my beginning to cut its fat was a good exercize in editing. It is a short film that one awards at a local festival. Now Sitges might have been nice to add... but there has been no coverage elsewhere.... even trivial. And I have been looking. Sometimes a shiney stone is just a shiney stone, and not a dianond. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 15:15, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

284386 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284386 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-07 15:21:00 +++$+++ 1.168212060E09 +++$+++ Please answer (on a stamped and self-addressed postcard please) on our talk page. (This might be more interesting than talking about MBEs... :)  +++$+++ Please answer (on a stamped and self-addressed postcard please) on our talk page. (This might be more interesting than talking about MBEs... :) [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde, Mr Hornby, and Sir Sean de Garde]] 15:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
284387 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284386 +++$+++ 284386 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.168236840E09 +++$+++ Q - Should I descend on The Beatles' page and add everything Beatle-ish with citations, and then only put really good, personal stuff in Lennon's, etc.? For example: Mimi threw a chicken and a hand-mirror at John because he bought a leather coat for Cynthia\". \"McCartney saw Lennon as the Emperor of his house whilst they were both on LSD.\" This is stuff that could never go on The Beatles page. Time to get the hair shirt out again... (Ouch...)  +++$+++ :Q - Should I descend on The Beatles' page and add everything Beatle-ish with citations, and then only put really good, personal stuff in Lennon's, etc.? For example: Mimi threw a chicken and a hand-mirror at John because he bought a leather coat for Cynthia". "McCartney saw Lennon as the Emperor of his house whilst they were both on LSD." This is stuff that could never go on The Beatles page. Time to get the hair shirt out again... (Ouch...) [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 22:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
284388 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284386 +++$+++ 284387 +++$+++ 2007-01-07 22:38:00 +++$+++ 1.168238280E09 +++$+++ well, yeah there's no point in having everything duplicated, for sure, and there;s no point in bogging down the Beatles article with little details about personal stuff, or bogging down the Lennon article with an exegesis (my $2 word of the day) on how high they all were when they met the Queen, but you can't have an article about Lennon without a decent section on the Beatles that is like a summary of the longer page, and you can't have a Beatles page without talking about Lennon when he was a Beatle.    I think that the problem is that of course there's great overlap and forked off articles about a lot of Beatles stuff because there's a lot of ground to cover. But you still want someone to go to [[The Beatles]] and get more than a collection of \"See main article\" links to other pages.  <strong> +++$+++ ::well, yeah there's no point in having everything duplicated, for sure, and there;s no point in bogging down the Beatles article with little details about personal stuff, or bogging down the Lennon article with an exegesis (my $2 word of the day) on how high they all were when they met the Queen, but you can't have an article about Lennon without a decent section on the Beatles that is like a summary of the longer page, and you can't have a Beatles page without talking about Lennon when he was a Beatle.    I think that the problem is that of course there's great overlap and forked off articles about a lot of Beatles stuff because there's a lot of ground to cover. But you still want someone to go to [[The Beatles]] and get more than a collection of "See main article" links to other pages.  <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small> [[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 22:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
284389 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284386 +++$+++ 284388 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.168264740E09 +++$+++ I suppose I'm toying with the idea that we should do all the factual stuff concerning all four of the Fabs on the main page, and then dig deeper on their 'personal' pages. I spotted some urban legends on the Aunt Mimi page, BTW. Shortly before she died she confessed that she, \"had led a wicked life\", and had been \"a very cruel woman\", which is fascinating stuff. (Do you know she rented out one room in her house to John and Cynthia?) If this all sounds like the ravings of a lunatic, please contact your local fish and chip shop and complain...  +++$+++ :::I suppose I'm toying with the idea that we should do all the factual stuff concerning all four of the Fabs on the main page, and then dig deeper on their 'personal' pages. I spotted some urban legends on the Aunt Mimi page, BTW. Shortly before she died she confessed that she, "had led a wicked life", and had been "a very cruel woman", which is fascinating stuff. (Do you know she rented out one room in her house to John and Cynthia?) If this all sounds like the ravings of a lunatic, please contact your local fish and chip shop and complain... [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 05:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
284390 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284386 +++$+++ 284389 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 06:31:00 +++$+++ 1.168266660E09 +++$+++ Well, personally I like that idea, and I totally agree with you that by the third time, even 2nd time, of reading the same thing you want to take a nap. And I agree that you don't need to go into the Epstein-Decca level details  on the individual pages. I don;t know, maybe just referring people to the main Beatles article would work - it just seems a little odd to me to have a page about Lennon or Macca and just a little about the Beatles.   Problem, to me, are the GA\/FA  expectations - if you want to know what I ''really'' think,  I don't give a rat's ass about GA and FA, insofar as the length requirements restrict the quality of articles. I mean it's cool to get GA and FA, and it would be very cool (except for the vandals) to see these articles on the main page, but I think sometimes there's too  much emphasis on trying to meet that goal and forcing cuts to some arbitrary length and a toning down of the kinds of things you might like to add, and maybe too much \"sameness\" between the articles in the interests of uniformity.  But I'm willing to work on them with the GA\/FA goal if that's what the group wants, so this is just what I really think.   I haven't really looked at the recent stuff you've done - I will now - I've been busy arguing on the Cat Stevens page with a rather unpleasant guy who's accusing me of all sorts of untrue nonsense and is actually the one who is totally ignoring a hidden-text note asking editors to discuss before changing how the name should be rendered - classic POV pushing, and nasty too.  So I welcome the opportunity to return to the beatles pages with sane people who don't view it as their mission in life to rid wikipedia of anything out of the ordinary and slime people on the way there.<strong> +++$+++ ::::Well, personally I like that idea, and I totally agree with you that by the third time, even 2nd time, of reading the same thing you want to take a nap. And I agree that you don't need to go into the Epstein-Decca level details  on the individual pages. I don;t know, maybe just referring people to the main Beatles article would work - it just seems a little odd to me to have a page about Lennon or Macca and just a little about the Beatles.   Problem, to me, are the GA/FA  expectations - if you want to know what I ''really'' think,  I don't give a rat's ass about GA and FA, insofar as the length requirements restrict the quality of articles. I mean it's cool to get GA and FA, and it would be very cool (except for the vandals) to see these articles on the main page, but I think sometimes there's too  much emphasis on trying to meet that goal and forcing cuts to some arbitrary length and a toning down of the kinds of things you might like to add, and maybe too much "sameness" between the articles in the interests of uniformity.  But I'm willing to work on them with the GA/FA goal if that's what the group wants, so this is just what I really think.   I haven't really looked at the recent stuff you've done - I will now - I've been busy arguing on the Cat Stevens page with a rather unpleasant guy who's accusing me of all sorts of untrue nonsense and is actually the one who is totally ignoring a hidden-text note asking editors to discuss before changing how the name should be rendered - classic POV pushing, and nasty too.  So I welcome the opportunity to return to the beatles pages with sane people who don't view it as their mission in life to rid wikipedia of anything out of the ordinary and slime people on the way there.<strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small> [[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 06:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
284391 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284386 +++$+++ 284390 +++$+++ 2007-01-08 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.168293240E09 +++$+++ Good points, as always.  +++$+++ :::::Good points, as always. [[User:Andreasegde|Mr Fish-and-chip shop man]] 13:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

541941 +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541941 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-09 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.189407120E09 +++$+++ #I can't log in to VP, what gives? <br> +++$+++ #I can't log in to VP, what gives? <br>[[User:Dreamafter|<font color="Gold">Dr</font><font color="orange">ea</font><font color="red">my</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Dreamafter|<font color="indigo">\*/</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Dreamafter|<font color="lime">!$!</font>]]</sub> 23:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
541942 +++$+++ Dreadstar +++$+++ Dreamafter +++$+++ 541941 +++$+++ 541941 +++$+++ 2007-09-10 02:02:00 +++$+++ 1.189414920E09 +++$+++ #What seems to be the problem logging in?  I see you've been approved, but they may not have added you to the list or it may be corrupt.  Check out the [[User_talk:AmiDaniel\/VP\/FAQ#.22You_are_not_on_the_user_list.22|FAQ]], maybe it will help you identify the problem.   +++$+++ :#What seems to be the problem logging in?  I see you've been approved, but they may not have added you to the list or it may be corrupt.  Check out the [[User_talk:AmiDaniel/VP/FAQ#.22You_are_not_on_the_user_list.22|FAQ]], maybe it will help you identify the problem.  [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 02:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

22245 +++$+++ The ed17 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22245 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-01 01:05:00 +++$+++ 1.301645100E09 +++$+++ A running total of claims can be seen [[Wikipedia:WikiCup\/History\/2011\/Running totals|here]]. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round three is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup\/Reviews]]. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]] and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup\/Newsletter\/Send]].<\/small> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] and  +++$+++ A running total of claims can be seen [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2011/Running totals|here]]. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round three is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews]]. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]] and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] and [[User:The ed17|The ed17]] 01:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
22246 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22245 +++$+++ 22245 +++$+++ 2011-04-06 18:33:00 +++$+++ 1.302139980E09 +++$+++ Stop edit warring to add useless content, stop saying not-notable characters are notable, and stop putting spurious unsigned templates on my page.  Also, it should be noted that I was not the one who removed P-Z the first time '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color=\"#660066\">Purpleback<\/font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color=\"#000000\">pack<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Stop edit warring to add useless content, stop saying not-notable characters are notable, and stop putting spurious unsigned templates on my page.  Also, it should be noted that I was not the one who removed P-Z the first time '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 18:33, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

22248 +++$+++  Toddst1 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22248 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-08 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.302304680E09 +++$+++ Hello. You appear to be involved in an [[WP:EW|edit war]] on [[ List of Oz characters \u200e ]].  While [[WP:3RR|the three-revert rule]] is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits.  Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.  Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked.  +++$+++ Hello. You appear to be involved in an [[WP:EW|edit war]] on [[ List of Oz characters ‎ ]].  While [[WP:3RR|the three-revert rule]] is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits.  Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.  Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 16:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
22249 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22248 +++$+++ 22248 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 21:17:00 +++$+++ 1.302322620E09 +++$+++ I haven't edited the page in two days, and most of my 50+ edits to the page have been adding content '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color=\"#660066\">Purpleback<\/font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color=\"#000000\">pack<\/font>]] +++$+++ :I haven't edited the page in two days, and most of my 50+ edits to the page have been adding content '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 21:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
22250 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22248 +++$+++ 22249 +++$+++ 2011-04-11 02:47:00 +++$+++ 1.302515220E09 +++$+++ Got it. FYI, I'm a guy '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color=\"#660066\">Purpleback<\/font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color=\"#000000\">pack<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::Got it. FYI, I'm a guy '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 02:47, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

284394 +++$+++ Gzkn +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284394 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-09 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.168342920E09 +++$+++ Ah yes, thanks for pitching in! Sorry for forgetting to notify you. Anyway, I don't agree with the \"pitiful\" assessment, but it could definitely be improved. What do you think of the new lead?  +++$+++ Ah yes, thanks for pitching in! Sorry for forgetting to notify you. Anyway, I don't agree with the "pitiful" assessment, but it could definitely be improved. What do you think of the new lead? [[User:Gzkn|Gzkn]] 03:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
284395 +++$+++ Gzkn +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284394 +++$+++ 284394 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 05:38:00 +++$+++ 1.168349880E09 +++$+++ Huh...the signature thing is rather interesting, but I don't think it adds any real value to the article. Maybe someone is just going through and adding it to all the politician articles? I, too, feel that some of the information on his sponsored legislation and the like can be condensed, and some of the less important stuff eliminated. Otherwise, this is going to be one long article two or three years from now! Some of the long quotations could probably be trimmed as well.  +++$+++ :Huh...the signature thing is rather interesting, but I don't think it adds any real value to the article. Maybe someone is just going through and adding it to all the politician articles? I, too, feel that some of the information on his sponsored legislation and the like can be condensed, and some of the less important stuff eliminated. Otherwise, this is going to be one long article two or three years from now! Some of the long quotations could probably be trimmed as well. [[User:Gzkn|Gzkn]] 05:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
284396 +++$+++ Gzkn +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284394 +++$+++ 284395 +++$+++ 2007-01-09 05:54:00 +++$+++ 1.168350840E09 +++$+++ Yeah, that was a rather amusing. Especially the long rant on the talk page. :)  +++$+++ ::Yeah, that was a rather amusing. Especially the long rant on the talk page. :) [[User:Gzkn|Gzkn]] 05:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

22251 +++$+++ DMelvinKaphan +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22251 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-12 02:13:00 +++$+++ 1.302599580E09 +++$+++ You've got a solid sandbox page on the Super Mash Bros.  You could easily get that up to speed for the public.  I know that has been back and forth, but if you make some small changes I think it would be ready to get back up. I see that the page has been bounced around a couple of times, but I'm not sure why.   +++$+++ You've got a solid sandbox page on the Super Mash Bros.  You could easily get that up to speed for the public.  I know that has been back and forth, but if you make some small changes I think it would be ready to get back up. I see that the page has been bounced around a couple of times, but I'm not sure why.  [[User:DMelvinKaphan|DMelvinKaphan]] ([[User talk:DMelvinKaphan|talk]]) 02:13, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
22252 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22251 +++$+++ 22251 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.302604680E09 +++$+++ References.  People think the references aren't reliable enough.  It was SALTed by [[User:Pax:Vobiscum]], so you might want to talk to him about it '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color=\"#660066\">Purpleback<\/font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color=\"#000000\">pack<\/font>]] +++$+++ :References.  People think the references aren't reliable enough.  It was SALTed by [[User:Pax:Vobiscum]], so you might want to talk to him about it '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 03:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

284398 +++$+++ HailFire +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284398 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-22 01:18:00 +++$+++ 1.169457480E09 +++$+++ \"I inhaled\", \"Muslim school\", and Iran sources now appear in article Notes with text intros. It's all in there, without punishing the article. You holding up OK with the big crowd? Hope so. -- +++$+++ "I inhaled", "Muslim school", and Iran sources now appear in article Notes with text intros. It's all in there, without punishing the article. You holding up OK with the big crowd? Hope so. --[[User:HailFire|HailFire]] 01:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
284399 +++$+++ HailFire +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284398 +++$+++ 284398 +++$+++ 2007-01-23 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.169595000E09 +++$+++ ''14:11, 23 January 2007 Italiavivi (Talk | contribs) (Section is not restricted to what was in one book. Quote is notable, taped, and sourced; cease your edit-warring and take it to Talk, HailFire.)'' {sigh}... I thought I had taken it to Talk. Won't revert it myself as I don't want to risk feeding him. -- +++$+++ :''14:11, 23 January 2007 Italiavivi (Talk | contribs) (Section is not restricted to what was in one book. Quote is notable, taped, and sourced; cease your edit-warring and take it to Talk, HailFire.)'' {sigh}... I thought I had taken it to Talk. Won't revert it myself as I don't want to risk feeding him. --[[User:HailFire|HailFire]] 15:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

22255 +++$+++ GeorgeLouis +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22255 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-07 16:57:00 +++$+++ 1.304812620E09 +++$+++ Hello. Just wondering if you have a source for this: \"Many clubs, such as Los Angeles' Zamorano Club, used a refusal to admit Communist as a pretext for excluding Jews (the Jewish-American bookseller Jake Zeitlin was denied admission for over forty years under those circumstances).\" If so, can you kindly put your citation on the above page? Sincerely, your friend,  +++$+++ Hello. Just wondering if you have a source for this: "Many clubs, such as Los Angeles' Zamorano Club, used a refusal to admit Communist as a pretext for excluding Jews (the Jewish-American bookseller Jake Zeitlin was denied admission for over forty years under those circumstances)." If so, can you kindly put your citation on the above page? Sincerely, your friend, [[User:GeorgeLouis|GeorgeLouis]] ([[User talk:GeorgeLouis|talk]]) 16:57, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
22256 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22255 +++$+++ 22255 +++$+++ 2011-05-07 20:00:00 +++$+++ 1.304823600E09 +++$+++ I put in a source.  Not sure if it's formatted correctly, but that's probably an easy fix. '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color=\"#660066\">Purpleback<\/font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color=\"#000000\">pack<\/font>]] +++$+++ :I put in a source.  Not sure if it's formatted correctly, but that's probably an easy fix. '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 20:00, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

284400 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284400 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-10 00:53:00 +++$+++ 1.168419180E09 +++$+++ would I know you from no-more-songs? <strong> +++$+++ would I know you from no-more-songs? <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small> [[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 00:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
284401 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284400 +++$+++ 284400 +++$+++ 2007-01-10 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.168421580E09 +++$+++ Almost certainly. I'm a member of n-m-s.  +++$+++ :Almost certainly. I'm a member of n-m-s. [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] 01:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

284404 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-12 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.168669560E09 +++$+++ I really hope that you are not angry, but I created some Archive pages for you. I didn't know how to do it a few months ago, so Crestville (Beatles member) did it for me. I am only passing on the same gift to you. Hope you don't mind. (Ouch!)  +++$+++ I really hope that you are not angry, but I created some Archive pages for you. I didn't know how to do it a few months ago, so Crestville (Beatles member) did it for me. I am only passing on the same gift to you. Hope you don't mind. (Ouch!) [[User:Andreasegde|Mr Fish-and-Chip shop man]] 22:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
284405 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284404 +++$+++ 284404 +++$+++ 2007-01-13 04:54:00 +++$+++ 1.168692840E09 +++$+++ No, absolutely I'm not angry - that's way cool!  I never would have figured out how to do it.  And, it'll be my birthday in 9 minutes, so I will accept it as my birthday present!  NOw to find a few minutes to decie how much to archinve...   Thanks!  <strong> +++$+++ :No, absolutely I'm not angry - that's way cool!  I never would have figured out how to do it.  And, it'll be my birthday in 9 minutes, so I will accept it as my birthday present!  NOw to find a few minutes to decie how much to archinve...   Thanks!  <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small> [[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 04:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
284406 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284404 +++$+++ 284405 +++$+++ 2007-01-14 22:18:00 +++$+++ 1.168841880E09 +++$+++ I 'borrowed' your \"sense of humour\" logo...  +++$+++ ::I 'borrowed' your "sense of humour" logo... [[User:Andreasegde|andreasegde]] 22:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
284407 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284404 +++$+++ 284406 +++$+++ 2007-01-15 00:29:00 +++$+++ 1.168849740E09 +++$+++ P.S. Have a look at [[Mimi Smith]], and cast your eagle-eyes over it.  +++$+++ :::P.S. Have a look at [[Mimi Smith]], and cast your eagle-eyes over it. [[User:Andreasegde|Mr Humour-Humor-Hummer-Homer-Homer Simpson]] 00:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

22261 +++$+++ Crossmr +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22261 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-17 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308313320E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 05:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
22262 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22261 +++$+++ 22261 +++$+++ 2011-06-17 05:34:00 +++$+++ 1.308314040E09 +++$+++ Well, he edit-warred related to images in the instance I bring up, so it's valid either way.  I will also comment in that discussion '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color=\"#660066\">Purpleback<\/font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color=\"#000000\">pack<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Well, he edit-warred related to images in the instance I bring up, so it's valid either way.  I will also comment in that discussion '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 05:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
22263 +++$+++ Dominic +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22261 +++$+++ 22261 +++$+++ 2011-06-22 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.308781320E09 +++$+++ Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives\u2014which houses some of America's most important historical documents\u2014is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM\/NARA\/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]].  +++$+++ :Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the '''National Archives''' and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created [[WP:NARA]] to launch these efforts. <p> There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please [[Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Participants|sign up and introduce yourself]]. [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

546550 +++$+++ McWomble +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546550 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-06 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.225999200E09 +++$+++ I removed your prod because the article author removed a speedy deletion template, which I have now restored.  +++$+++ I removed your prod because the article author removed a speedy deletion template, which I have now restored. [[User:McWomble|McWomble]] ([[User talk:McWomble|talk]]) 11:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
546551 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546550 +++$+++ 546550 +++$+++ 2008-11-06 11:24:00 +++$+++ 1.225999440E09 +++$+++ I understand. However, I don't think an A7 CSD will apply here -- the article suggests notability through recording and airplay. I think this will require the Afd route. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :I understand. However, I don't think an A7 CSD will apply here -- the article suggests notability through recording and airplay. I think this will require the Afd route. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 11:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
546552 +++$+++ McWomble +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546550 +++$+++ 546551 +++$+++ 2008-11-06 11:31:00 +++$+++ 1.225999860E09 +++$+++ It has already been speedied once, about 2 hours ago.  +++$+++ ::It has already been speedied once, about 2 hours ago. [[User:McWomble|McWomble]] ([[User talk:McWomble|talk]]) 11:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
546553 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546550 +++$+++ 546552 +++$+++ 2008-11-06 11:36:00 +++$+++ 1.226000160E09 +++$+++ Okay. Thanks for the clarification. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Okay. Thanks for the clarification. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 11:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

22265 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22265 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-29 21:33:00 +++$+++ 1.309408380E09 +++$+++ <big><font color=blue>GO BLUE!!!!!!!!!<\/font color><\/big> '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color=\"#660066\">Purpleback<\/font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color=\"#000000\">pack<\/font>]] +++$+++ <big><font color=blue>GO BLUE!!!!!!!!!</font color></big> '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 21:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
22266 +++$+++ Tapered +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22265 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-29 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.309415040E09 +++$+++ 36-46. go.  +++$+++ ::36-46. go. [[User:Tapered|Tapered]] ([[User talk:Tapered|talk]]) 23:24, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
22267 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22265 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-06-30 01:25:00 +++$+++ 1.309422300E09 +++$+++ I am frankly ashamed that we have Kemp, Kershaw, and a record worse than the Mariners, Pirates, or Nats '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color=\"#660066\">Purpleback<\/font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color=\"#000000\">pack<\/font>]] +++$+++ :::I am frankly ashamed that we have Kemp, Kershaw, and a record worse than the Mariners, Pirates, or Nats '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 01:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

284410 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284410 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-17 14:11:00 +++$+++ 1.169071860E09 +++$+++ Thanks Tvoz!  Better late than never ;) \xb7 '''<font color=\"#709070\"> +++$+++ Thanks Tvoz!  Better late than never ;) · '''<font color="#709070">[[User:Jersyko|j e r s y k o]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' · 14:11, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
284411 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284410 +++$+++ 284410 +++$+++ 2007-01-20 22:50:00 +++$+++ 1.169362200E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I know . . . I admit, though, that things feel a little different for me now that I have the tools.  Before, there wasn't an admin watching the Obama page as far as I knew, so we had to beg for protection.  Now, all I'll have to do is click the little protect tab.  Anyway, we're still in agreement, I think, on the prospects of increasing vandalism on the page.  But HailFire et al have a point.  Cheers. \xb7 '''<font color=\"#709070\"> +++$+++ :Yeah, I know . . . I admit, though, that things feel a little different for me now that I have the tools.  Before, there wasn't an admin watching the Obama page as far as I knew, so we had to beg for protection.  Now, all I'll have to do is click the little protect tab.  Anyway, we're still in agreement, I think, on the prospects of increasing vandalism on the page.  But HailFire et al have a point.  Cheers. · '''<font color="#709070">[[User:Jersyko|j e r s y k o]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' · 22:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

396927 +++$+++ MartinPoulter +++$+++ Pathoschild +++$+++ 396927 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-28 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.304053080E09 +++$+++ Bold restructuring and clear re-writing. Nice work!  +++$+++ Bold restructuring and clear re-writing. Nice work! [[User:MartinPoulter|MartinPoulter]] ([[User talk:MartinPoulter|talk]]) 21:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
396928 +++$+++ Cburnett +++$+++ Cburnett +++$+++ 396927 +++$+++ 396927 +++$+++ 2011-04-05 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.302067920E09 +++$+++ Good point.  It appears to be a rendering problem with Wikipedia.  When you look directly at the SVG file (your second link) that is your browser rendering the SVG directly.  I'm not sure where to post this technical problem.   +++$+++ :Good point.  It appears to be a rendering problem with Wikipedia.  When you look directly at the SVG file (your second link) that is your browser rendering the SVG directly.  I'm not sure where to post this technical problem.  [[User:Cburnett|Cburnett]] ([[User talk:Cburnett#top|talk]]) 22:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
396929 +++$+++ Cburnett +++$+++ Cburnett +++$+++ 396927 +++$+++ 396928 +++$+++ 2011-04-06 01:31:00 +++$+++ 1.302078660E09 +++$+++ It appears such a problem falls onto that of librsvg that does the SVG -> PNG rendering (so it is nothing that MediaWiki developers will care about).  It may be remedied by specifically setting the color of the \"+\" to black.   +++$+++ ::It appears such a problem falls onto that of librsvg that does the SVG -> PNG rendering (so it is nothing that MediaWiki developers will care about).  It may be remedied by specifically setting the color of the "+" to black.  [[User:Cburnett|Cburnett]] ([[User talk:Cburnett#top|talk]]) 01:31, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

367361 +++$+++ Toon05 +++$+++ Adambro +++$+++ 367361 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-03-31 17:26:00 +++$+++ 1.270081560E09 +++$+++ Hi Adam. Just to note that the [[WP:PPOL]] states that \"A page and its talk page should not both be protected at the same time\", so I've unprotected it. I know it's a little irritating, but I think it may be best just to leave the talk page until this dies down. After all, one of these  new users may have something useful to add. \u2013&nbsp;<span style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC; font-size:15px;\">''' +++$+++ Hi Adam. Just to note that the [[WP:PPOL]] states that "A page and its talk page should not both be protected at the same time", so I've unprotected it. I know it's a little irritating, but I think it may be best just to leave the talk page until this dies down. After all, one of these  new users may have something useful to add. –&nbsp;<span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC; font-size:15px;">'''[[User talk:Toon05|Toon]]'''</span> 17:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
367362 +++$+++ Adambro +++$+++ Adambro +++$+++ 367361 +++$+++ 367361 +++$+++ 2010-03-31 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.270081740E09 +++$+++ Okay, fair enough, I wasn't aware of that but it doesn't surprise me. If the signal to noise ratio doesn't improve though it may be appropriate to reinstate the protection.  +++$+++ :Okay, fair enough, I wasn't aware of that but it doesn't surprise me. If the signal to noise ratio doesn't improve though it may be appropriate to reinstate the protection. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] ([[User talk:Adambro#top|talk]]) 17:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
367363 +++$+++ Toon05 +++$+++ Adambro +++$+++ 367361 +++$+++ 367362 +++$+++ 2010-03-31 17:31:00 +++$+++ 1.270081860E09 +++$+++ Lol. Bloody Scott Mills. I came over to protect the article after hearing it to find that you were already there - nice reflexes. \u2013&nbsp;<span style=\"font-family:Bradley Hand ITC; font-size:15px;\">''' +++$+++ ::Lol. Bloody Scott Mills. I came over to protect the article after hearing it to find that you were already there - nice reflexes. –&nbsp;<span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC; font-size:15px;">'''[[User talk:Toon05|Toon]]'''</span> 17:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
367364 +++$+++ Adambro +++$+++ Adambro +++$+++ 367361 +++$+++ 367363 +++$+++ 2010-03-31 17:37:00 +++$+++ 1.270082220E09 +++$+++ I listen to Radio 1 enough to know that if a particular Wikipedia article gets anything beyond a trivial mention, vandalism is highly likely so will be there ready to protect it pretty promptly. Scott's comments today are probably to the more severe end of the spectrum. It seems fairly obvious from what I can see at the moment that deletion is appropriate due to the concerns highlighted.  +++$+++ :::I listen to Radio 1 enough to know that if a particular Wikipedia article gets anything beyond a trivial mention, vandalism is highly likely so will be there ready to protect it pretty promptly. Scott's comments today are probably to the more severe end of the spectrum. It seems fairly obvious from what I can see at the moment that deletion is appropriate due to the concerns highlighted. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] ([[User talk:Adambro#top|talk]]) 17:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

602448 +++$+++ Zyxoas +++$+++ Mark Dingemanse +++$+++ 602448 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-22 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.190494080E09 +++$+++ Yo! I thought I might just squeeze this in when I could. Do you know of any sound laws that might change the sequence C1V1C2V2 to C1V1V2C2V2?? I found the following in Sesotho: <p\/>lerole to lerwele (dust, PB *tudi), lengole to lengwele (knee), lekote to lekwete (clod), kgole to kgwele (rope), lesofe to leswefe (albino). I speak the second way but I know there are people who speak the first way. Basically, the two vowels are the same height and (I guess) the 2 vowel is copied to after the 1, which labialises the 1 consonant. Look familiar?<p\/> +++$+++ Yo! I thought I might just squeeze this in when I could. Do you know of any sound laws that might change the sequence C1V1C2V2 to C1V1V2C2V2?? I found the following in Sesotho: <p/>lerole to lerwele (dust, PB *tudi), lengole to lengwele (knee), lekote to lekwete (clod), kgole to kgwele (rope), lesofe to leswefe (albino). I speak the second way but I know there are people who speak the first way. Basically, the two vowels are the same height and (I guess) the 2 vowel is copied to after the 1, which labialises the 1 consonant. Look familiar?<p/>[[User:Zyxoas|Tebello]] [[User talk:Zyxoas|The'''''WHAT!!??''''']] 13:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
602449 +++$+++ Mark Dingemanse +++$+++ Mark Dingemanse +++$+++ 602448 +++$+++ 602448 +++$+++ 2007-10-01 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.191260880E09 +++$+++ Shouldn't your formula be (CV<sub>1<\/sub>)CV<sub>2<\/sub>CV<sub>1<\/sub>, as the C's don't seem to matter? I don't know much about sound laws in Bantu, though. But I can always try to tell a story. If you find it only in syllables which have \/o\/ as V2, that would support the idea that this involves labialisation under influence of the articulatory features (esp. roundedness) of [o]. This labialisation eats away at the syllable peak, which leads to a phonotactic vacuum that must be filled according to the syllable requirements of the language; this leads to an \/e\/ coming into being (epenthesis, if you will). It would be very nice if \/e\/ was the unmarked vowel in Sotho, which I don't know. &mdash;  +++$+++ :Shouldn't your formula be (CV<sub>1</sub>)CV<sub>2</sub>CV<sub>1</sub>, as the C's don't seem to matter? I don't know much about sound laws in Bantu, though. But I can always try to tell a story. If you find it only in syllables which have /o/ as V2, that would support the idea that this involves labialisation under influence of the articulatory features (esp. roundedness) of [o]. This labialisation eats away at the syllable peak, which leads to a phonotactic vacuum that must be filled according to the syllable requirements of the language; this leads to an /e/ coming into being (epenthesis, if you will). It would be very nice if /e/ was the unmarked vowel in Sotho, which I don't know. &mdash; [[User:Mark Dingemanse|mark]] [[User Talk:Mark Dingemanse|&#9998;]] 10:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

22271 +++$+++ Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22271 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-01 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.312258500E09 +++$+++ |style=\"vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;\" | Thanks for putting forward the suggestion on ANI that we block, rather than ban, User:LiteralKa. It may or may not pass, but at the end of the day, you did the right thing by suggesting it.  +++$+++ |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for putting forward the suggestion on ANI that we block, rather than ban, User:LiteralKa. It may or may not pass, but at the end of the day, you did the right thing by suggesting it. [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|The Cavalry]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Message me]]) 21:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
22272 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22271 +++$+++ 22271 +++$+++ 2011-08-01 21:29:00 +++$+++ 1.312259340E09 +++$+++ Thank you '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color=\"#660066\">Purpleback<\/font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color=\"#000000\">pack<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Thank you '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 21:29, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

22273 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22273 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 07:03:00 +++$+++ 1.312466580E09 +++$+++ Note, I'm not being sarcastic, pedantic, pointy or anything like that; just genuinely think it might need clarifying. I make plenty of mistakes myself. Best, <small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ Note, I'm not being sarcastic, pedantic, pointy or anything like that; just genuinely think it might need clarifying. I make plenty of mistakes myself. Best, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 07:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
22274 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22273 +++$+++ 22273 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 15:59:00 +++$+++ 1.312498740E09 +++$+++ Dang word that isn't spelled like it sounds.  Oh, and thanks for signing your name...I wanted a copy of your code since it contains highlighted text with a border '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color=\"#660066\">Purpleback<\/font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color=\"#000000\">pack<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Dang word that isn't spelled like it sounds.  Oh, and thanks for signing your name...I wanted a copy of your code since it contains highlighted text with a border '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 15:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
22275 +++$+++ Chzz +++$+++ Purplebackpack89 +++$+++ 22273 +++$+++ 22274 +++$+++ 2011-08-04 18:10:00 +++$+++ 1.312506600E09 +++$+++ The code might well be wrong\/broken\/silly\/against-guideline-#9001. But you're welcome to copy it, of course. I stole it from {{user|Netsnipe}} <small><span style=\"border:1px solid;background:#00008B\"> +++$+++ ::The code might well be wrong/broken/silly/against-guideline-#9001. But you're welcome to copy it, of course. I stole it from {{user|Netsnipe}} <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 18:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

284421 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284421 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-23 22:55:00 +++$+++ 1.169621700E09 +++$+++ Okay, semi-protected. I don't know why VoA declined at the time, but it currently looks like it needs to protection. ''' +++$+++ Okay, semi-protected. I don't know why VoA declined at the time, but it currently looks like it needs to protection. '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 22:55, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
284422 +++$+++ Nishkid64 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284421 +++$+++ 284421 +++$+++ 2007-01-24 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.169697540E09 +++$+++ Since I'm not particularly sure how long we'll need this, I did not specify an expiry date for the protection. ''' +++$+++ :Since I'm not particularly sure how long we'll need this, I did not specify an expiry date for the protection. '''[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="background:#009;color:#7FFF00">Nish</span><span style="background:cyan;color:#009">kid</span>]][[User talk:Nishkid64|<span style="background:orange;color:navy blue">64</span>]]''' 19:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

22278 +++$+++ DReifGalaxyM31 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22278 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-02 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.291333140E09 +++$+++ I haven't seen anyone else speaking up about the article's inclusion on the AFD page.  +++$+++ I haven't seen anyone else speaking up about the article's inclusion on the AFD page. [[User:DReifGalaxyM31|DReifGalaxyM31]] ([[User talk:DReifGalaxyM31|talk]]) 15:39, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
22279 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22278 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2010-12-17 19:15:00 +++$+++ 1.292642100E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, undeletion requests aren't allowed to challenge previous deletion discussions; they can only be used in cases of accidents (as I understand it).  If the article can be rewritten to be more notable, it'll probably stay online, though.  +++$+++ :::Unfortunately, undeletion requests aren't allowed to challenge previous deletion discussions; they can only be used in cases of accidents (as I understand it).  If the article can be rewritten to be more notable, it'll probably stay online, though. [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers#top|talk]]) 19:15, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

546567 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546567 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-22 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.227397440E09 +++$+++ I see you did quite some editing on Danish film and actor pages. Could I interest you in writing the article [[Emil Odepark]]? It's not exactly Danish, but hey, Swedes are Scandinavian too :) Also, I'm trying to set up an [[User:MacGyverMagic\/Bootcamp|article writing class]]. Interested in helping? -  +++$+++ I see you did quite some editing on Danish film and actor pages. Could I interest you in writing the article [[Emil Odepark]]? It's not exactly Danish, but hey, Swedes are Scandinavian too :) Also, I'm trying to set up an [[User:MacGyverMagic/Bootcamp|article writing class]]. Interested in helping? - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 15:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
546568 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546567 +++$+++ 546567 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 16:08:00 +++$+++ 1.227398880E09 +++$+++ You're right, there's too many trigger-happy people around who'd delete him just for that. (I do think he might have received awards for that, though, can't be sure). Perhaps creating an article on the film would be a better idea then. My idea for the article course would be to take a similar approach to it as [[User:Hersfold]] does with his user adoptions (see [[User:Hersfold\/Adopt|this page]]). Write separate lessons (information interspersed with exercises) to help people along from an idea to a fully-fledged article. I'd start with a lesson on article topic selection, continue with finding and using reliable sources, and through good writing skills and wikicode for templates and infoboxes all the way up to the blingy stuff like sounds, videos and other non-essential stuff to beef it up. Do you have any concrete material from that real-life idea for such a class? -  +++$+++ *You're right, there's too many trigger-happy people around who'd delete him just for that. (I do think he might have received awards for that, though, can't be sure). Perhaps creating an article on the film would be a better idea then. My idea for the article course would be to take a similar approach to it as [[User:Hersfold]] does with his user adoptions (see [[User:Hersfold/Adopt|this page]]). Write separate lessons (information interspersed with exercises) to help people along from an idea to a fully-fledged article. I'd start with a lesson on article topic selection, continue with finding and using reliable sources, and through good writing skills and wikicode for templates and infoboxes all the way up to the blingy stuff like sounds, videos and other non-essential stuff to beef it up. Do you have any concrete material from that real-life idea for such a class? - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
546569 +++$+++ MacGyverMagic +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546567 +++$+++ 546568 +++$+++ 2008-11-23 13:31:00 +++$+++ 1.227475860E09 +++$+++ Unfortunately, a lot of people who drop in have self-promotional ideas in mind. But there are quite a few people who are interested in contributing beyond their initial article idea. Suggesting interesting WikiProjects or similar articles that might warrant inclusion are ways to encourage them to stay around. (I agree, encouragement should be a major part of the course) I'm intending to pick up trainees by moving the page to Wikipedia-space once it has been fully developed. -  +++$+++ **Unfortunately, a lot of people who drop in have self-promotional ideas in mind. But there are quite a few people who are interested in contributing beyond their initial article idea. Suggesting interesting WikiProjects or similar articles that might warrant inclusion are ways to encourage them to stay around. (I agree, encouragement should be a major part of the course) I'm intending to pick up trainees by moving the page to Wikipedia-space once it has been fully developed. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 13:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

22280 +++$+++ TenPoundHammer +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-10 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.292047680E09 +++$+++ \"Why so angry?  [[WP:ILIKEIT]] is true, but if notability can be established, it should be kept.  That was my reasoning on voting \"Keep\" for that article.  Someone should add sections to [[Mr. Monk Goes to the Dentist]] on Production and Reception, and everything should be fine.\" And what do you suggest they use as sources? The sources aren't just gonna appear out of thin air. You can't build a \"reception and production\" section by just pulling it out of your ass. <span style=\"color:green\">Ten Pound Hammer<\/span>, [[Special:Contributions\/TenPoundHammer|his otters]] and a clue-bat \u2022 <sup>( +++$+++ "Why so angry?  [[WP:ILIKEIT]] is true, but if notability can be established, it should be kept.  That was my reasoning on voting "Keep" for that article.  Someone should add sections to [[Mr. Monk Goes to the Dentist]] on Production and Reception, and everything should be fine." And what do you suggest they use as sources? The sources aren't just gonna appear out of thin air. You can't build a "reception and production" section by just pulling it out of your ass. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, [[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|his otters]] and a clue-bat • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otters want attention]])</sup> 22:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
22281 +++$+++ DReifGalaxyM31 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22280 +++$+++ 22280 +++$+++ 2010-12-15 19:23:00 +++$+++ 1.292469780E09 +++$+++ If sources can't be found, or if the sections aren't built, go ahead and go on a deletion rampage. I wouldn't support it and would probably oppose and reject your deletions and get you blocked.  +++$+++ *If sources can't be found, or if the sections aren't built, go ahead and go on a deletion rampage. I wouldn't support it and would probably oppose and reject your deletions and get you blocked. [[User:DReifGalaxyM31|DReifGalaxyM31]] ([[User talk:DReifGalaxyM31|talk]]) 19:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

546571 +++$+++  +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-16 09:22:00 +++$+++ 1.226856120E09 +++$+++ Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, {{#if:VeggieTales|as you did at [[:VeggieTales]],}} you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> ''Do not add corporate logos to ancillary articles. It is a copyright violation. See [[Wikipedia:Logos]] for information.''  \u2014  +++$+++ Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, {{#if:VeggieTales|as you did at [[:VeggieTales]],}} you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> ''Do not add corporate logos to ancillary articles. It is a copyright violation. See [[Wikipedia:Logos]] for information.''  — [[User:CactusWriter]] 09:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
546572 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546571 +++$+++ 546571 +++$+++ 2008-11-28 08:16:00 +++$+++ 1.227888960E09 +++$+++ After you added the qubo logo to a 3-2-1 Penquins article on November 14, I left a note requesting that you not add corporate logos to articles. Two days later, you again added a corporate logo to the VeggieTales article, and I felt it necessary to leave the more strongly-worded warning that you quoted. I'm glad the second warning caught your attention and that you are now aware of the policy. Copyright violations on Wikipedia should be taken very seriously. I think it is great that you want to contribute to Wikipedia. However, reading the Wikipedia policies and guidelines will help you make useful contributions, and help you to avoid the warnings and blocks you have received. I'm putting a welcome template below which contains some helpful links. Good luck with your further editing. Regards. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :After you added the qubo logo to a 3-2-1 Penquins article on November 14, I left a note requesting that you not add corporate logos to articles. Two days later, you again added a corporate logo to the VeggieTales article, and I felt it necessary to leave the more strongly-worded warning that you quoted. I'm glad the second warning caught your attention and that you are now aware of the policy. Copyright violations on Wikipedia should be taken very seriously. I think it is great that you want to contribute to Wikipedia. However, reading the Wikipedia policies and guidelines will help you make useful contributions, and help you to avoid the warnings and blocks you have received. I'm putting a welcome template below which contains some helpful links. Good luck with your further editing. Regards. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 08:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

284428 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284428 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-27 20:20:00 +++$+++ 1.169958000E09 +++$+++ I came across this page and felt inclined to comment on the talkpage. I then read back and noticed your comments. Are you still unhappy about this page? If you are then I will unwatch it (it isn't as if I am looking for more exchanges of opinion).  +++$+++ I came across this page and felt inclined to comment on the talkpage. I then read back and noticed your comments. Are you still unhappy about this page? If you are then I will unwatch it (it isn't as if I am looking for more exchanges of opinion). [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 20:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
284429 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284428 +++$+++ 284428 +++$+++ 2007-01-27 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.169959680E09 +++$+++ ...for the moment.  +++$+++ :...for the moment. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 20:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

546573 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546573 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-28 05:12:00 +++$+++ 1.227877920E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 05:12, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
546574 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546573 +++$+++ 546573 +++$+++ 2008-11-28 07:07:00 +++$+++ 1.227884820E09 +++$+++ {{done}} I see that yesterday someone replaced my [[10 to Midnight]] DVD cover image with an image of the original movie poster. Since the poster is the preferable image for movie articles, I've requested a G7 CSD of my old upload. Regards <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :{{done}} I see that yesterday someone replaced my [[10 to Midnight]] DVD cover image with an image of the original movie poster. Since the poster is the preferable image for movie articles, I've requested a G7 CSD of my old upload. Regards <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 07:07, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

22286 +++$+++ 78.35.223.72 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22286 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-19 19:34:00 +++$+++ 1.295494440E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_House_episodes&diff=408704962&oldid=408553451] The unbolding was more likely in the range of my thirty-thousandth edit. There is no exception defined in [[MOS:BOLD]] for bolding the currently aired number of episodes of a series. Much more importantly, what is the supposed rationale for bolding it, i.e. for this departure from standard text format? I know that even quoting MOS:BOLD to certain people usually leads to those people indolently adjusting the MoS to their wants, so I'll probably regret even seeking this dialogue. On the off-chance that you are at all willing to engage in sensible discussion, please tell me at least what the rationale for bolding the current number of episodes is. If any valid rationale can be formulated, we could easily settle on boldly adding or at least proposing an exception at MOS:BOLD. But try as I might, I cannot discern any valid reason to justify this extraordinary formatting. --[[Special:Contributions\/78.35.223.72|78.35.223.72]] ( +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_House_episodes&diff=408704962&oldid=408553451] The unbolding was more likely in the range of my thirty-thousandth edit. There is no exception defined in [[MOS:BOLD]] for bolding the currently aired number of episodes of a series. Much more importantly, what is the supposed rationale for bolding it, i.e. for this departure from standard text format? I know that even quoting MOS:BOLD to certain people usually leads to those people indolently adjusting the MoS to their wants, so I'll probably regret even seeking this dialogue. On the off-chance that you are at all willing to engage in sensible discussion, please tell me at least what the rationale for bolding the current number of episodes is. If any valid rationale can be formulated, we could easily settle on boldly adding or at least proposing an exception at MOS:BOLD. But try as I might, I cannot discern any valid reason to justify this extraordinary formatting. --[[Special:Contributions/78.35.223.72|78.35.223.72]] ([[User talk:78.35.223.72|talk]]) 19:34, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
22287 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22286 +++$+++ 22286 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.295504520E09 +++$+++ [copied from [[User talk:78.35.223.72]], let's keep the discussion confined to one place.] Unless you are an editor who hasn't logged in, [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Contributions\/78.35.223.72 this] does not equal 30000.  I have no evidence anywhere to suggest that you are any more than an IP editor.  Anyway, I didn't even know of the existence of [[MOS:BOLD]], and I frankly don't even know where to find all these rules or even that most of them exist.  I'm basing it on precedent, going off of [[List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes]], [[List of Parks and Recreation episodes]], and several others.  Whether you are an IP editor or a much more experienced editor, you're right about the bolding rule.  I'll leave it the way it is.  Please let me also direct your attention to [[WP:AGF]].  I had no idea that the bolding rule existed, so there's no reason to attack me for it.  +++$+++ :[copied from [[User talk:78.35.223.72]], let's keep the discussion confined to one place.] Unless you are an editor who hasn't logged in, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/78.35.223.72 this] does not equal 30000.  I have no evidence anywhere to suggest that you are any more than an IP editor.  Anyway, I didn't even know of the existence of [[MOS:BOLD]], and I frankly don't even know where to find all these rules or even that most of them exist.  I'm basing it on precedent, going off of [[List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes]], [[List of Parks and Recreation episodes]], and several others.  Whether you are an IP editor or a much more experienced editor, you're right about the bolding rule.  I'll leave it the way it is.  Please let me also direct your attention to [[WP:AGF]].  I had no idea that the bolding rule existed, so there's no reason to attack me for it. [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers|talk]]) 22:22, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
22288 +++$+++ 78.35.223.72 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22286 +++$+++ 22287 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.295508420E09 +++$+++ Please don't mistake my rightfully and (I believe) understandably being mildly pissed off with \"attacking you\". Seriously, citing AGF at me? That's grand, coming from someone who speaks as condescendingly of IP editors as you do, as though somehow I have to prove myself to you any more than vice versa. Do you honestly believe that that \"Yeoman editor badge\" gives you any seniority over anyone else on this website? [[Essjay|History should teach us]] (yeah, I was around for that) that any sort of credit claimed in a pseudonymous environment should be taken with more than a grain of salt, and sheer number of edits is next to entirely meaningless in an environment that is supposed to be based on consensus and reasoning. So what if someone actually made their very first edit? If that person provides a valid reasoning, are you going to dismiss it or even just treat it with any amount of reservation [[Argumentum ad hominem|based on who said it]]?<p>Also, I did not attack you in any way. When I said that I might regret this (which is the only part of my comment that might remotely be construed as being less than perfectly polite), I was speaking from years of experience with people --many of whom have shiny Yeoman badges on their user pages-- who auto-revert IPs just for the heck of it without ever bothering to look at the edit or the policy\/guidelines behind it, just assuming that IP equals newby, idiot or vandal. Well, let me tell you that as far as I know all of the worst malactors here are very well-established editors. Ironically, this is exactly how they get to be as harmful as they are, because guys like you who don't think twice about bashing on IP editors would never dare speak up to those people.<p>Lastly, regarding ''Whether you are an IP editor or a much more experienced editor'': You are assuming a contradiction where there is none. I happen to have a dynamic IP, but there are quite a few long-term IP editors (e.g. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=66.127.52.47 66.127.52.47]) who refuse to be a part of the \"[[meta:False community|community]]\" for various entirely legitimate reasons. Luckily for both of us, I don't indulge in age-ism, otherwise I'd have to assume that someone half my age likely isn't mature enough to use the correct categories when assessing their fellow editors. Having said that, thank you for making an effort, that alone makes you the exception rather than the rule. --[[Special:Contributions\/78.35.223.72|78.35.223.72]] ( +++$+++ ::Please don't mistake my rightfully and (I believe) understandably being mildly pissed off with "attacking you". Seriously, citing AGF at me? That's grand, coming from someone who speaks as condescendingly of IP editors as you do, as though somehow I have to prove myself to you any more than vice versa. Do you honestly believe that that "Yeoman editor badge" gives you any seniority over anyone else on this website? [[Essjay|History should teach us]] (yeah, I was around for that) that any sort of credit claimed in a pseudonymous environment should be taken with more than a grain of salt, and sheer number of edits is next to entirely meaningless in an environment that is supposed to be based on consensus and reasoning. So what if someone actually made their very first edit? If that person provides a valid reasoning, are you going to dismiss it or even just treat it with any amount of reservation [[Argumentum ad hominem|based on who said it]]?<p>Also, I did not attack you in any way. When I said that I might regret this (which is the only part of my comment that might remotely be construed as being less than perfectly polite), I was speaking from years of experience with people --many of whom have shiny Yeoman badges on their user pages-- who auto-revert IPs just for the heck of it without ever bothering to look at the edit or the policy/guidelines behind it, just assuming that IP equals newby, idiot or vandal. Well, let me tell you that as far as I know all of the worst malactors here are very well-established editors. Ironically, this is exactly how they get to be as harmful as they are, because guys like you who don't think twice about bashing on IP editors would never dare speak up to those people.<p>Lastly, regarding ''Whether you are an IP editor or a much more experienced editor'': You are assuming a contradiction where there is none. I happen to have a dynamic IP, but there are quite a few long-term IP editors (e.g. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=66.127.52.47 66.127.52.47]) who refuse to be a part of the "[[meta:False community|community]]" for various entirely legitimate reasons. Luckily for both of us, I don't indulge in age-ism, otherwise I'd have to assume that someone half my age likely isn't mature enough to use the correct categories when assessing their fellow editors. Having said that, thank you for making an effort, that alone makes you the exception rather than the rule. --[[Special:Contributions/78.35.223.72|78.35.223.72]] ([[User talk:78.35.223.72|talk]]) 23:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
22289 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22286 +++$+++ 22288 +++$+++ 2011-01-19 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.295509080E09 +++$+++ I'm just wondering why you were so mad about me reverting your edit one time, especially when it was something as simple as something being bolded that has been there for years.  If it was you who posted at [[User talk:SchrutedIt08]], I'm not sure that you have any room to accuse people of speaking condescendingly to each other.  As far as I can tell, his\/her edit was the first time anything had been unbolded.  I could be wrong.  And as far as speaking up to people, I challenge way more established editors all the time.  I do think twice about \"bashing\" IP editors, and only get frustrated when they are persistent vandals, people with extraordinarily bad grammar, or people who appear to be screaming at people for unbolding something on their (what appears to be) second edit.  +++$+++ :::I'm just wondering why you were so mad about me reverting your edit one time, especially when it was something as simple as something being bolded that has been there for years.  If it was you who posted at [[User talk:SchrutedIt08]], I'm not sure that you have any room to accuse people of speaking condescendingly to each other.  As far as I can tell, his/her edit was the first time anything had been unbolded.  I could be wrong.  And as far as speaking up to people, I challenge way more established editors all the time.  I do think twice about "bashing" IP editors, and only get frustrated when they are persistent vandals, people with extraordinarily bad grammar, or people who appear to be screaming at people for unbolding something on their (what appears to be) second edit. [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers#top|talk]]) 23:38, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

546576 +++$+++ Either way +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-07 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.228698720E09 +++$+++ A little while back, at the beginning of November, I had said that if you ever were considering adminship, that I would love to support and\/or nominate you.  Do you have any interest in pursuing it?   +++$+++ A little while back, at the beginning of November, I had said that if you ever were considering adminship, that I would love to support and/or nominate you.  Do you have any interest in pursuing it?  [[User:Either way|either way]] ([[User talk:Either way#top|talk]]) 17:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
546577 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546576 +++$+++ 546576 +++$+++ 2008-12-08 13:29:00 +++$+++ 1.228771740E09 +++$+++ Hi, either way. (For a short time there, I couldn't figure out who you were until I realized you had entered the \"admin relocation program\". That original moniker was a bit too notorious, eh?) Thanks for your thought about adminship, but I think I'll hold off with any decision about that for the time. And for two reasons. 1) Although I think I've discovered most of WP's important policy and discussion areas, there are a heckuva lot of backrooms around here. I'm only learning about the nooks and crannies as I stumble across them -- and a few more months to explore would help. I'd prefer to have a clearer concept of behind-the-scenes work if I ever decided to jump into it. 2) More importantly, I've got three \"real life\" book projects right now that should take me through February.  I would love to have a good excuse to procrastinate on them... but I shouldn't. So I don't really have a large chunk of time to commit to the project right now. I'm just treading water for the moment. Springtime, probably the beginning of April, would be a better time to consider this. Cheers <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Hi, either way. (For a short time there, I couldn't figure out who you were until I realized you had entered the "admin relocation program". That original moniker was a bit too notorious, eh?) Thanks for your thought about adminship, but I think I'll hold off with any decision about that for the time. And for two reasons. 1) Although I think I've discovered most of WP's important policy and discussion areas, there are a heckuva lot of backrooms around here. I'm only learning about the nooks and crannies as I stumble across them -- and a few more months to explore would help. I'd prefer to have a clearer concept of behind-the-scenes work if I ever decided to jump into it. 2) More importantly, I've got three "real life" book projects right now that should take me through February.  I would love to have a good excuse to procrastinate on them... but I shouldn't. So I don't really have a large chunk of time to commit to the project right now. I'm just treading water for the moment. Springtime, probably the beginning of April, would be a better time to consider this. Cheers <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 13:29, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

284434 +++$+++ Andreasegde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284434 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-01-28 00:10:00 +++$+++ 1.169971800E09 +++$+++ I forgot: Group decisions were the norm, but not when it came to BIG money...  +++$+++ I forgot: Group decisions were the norm, but not when it came to BIG money... [[User:Andreasegde|Not a pot to p#ss in]] 00:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
284435 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284434 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-01-28 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.169972340E09 +++$+++ I need to have dinner - my brain isn't working. Didn't you mean 50% to James for publishing, 50% to lenmac, then the Lenmac further divided btwn Epstein Lennon and Mac?  Dinner. definitely. <strong> +++$+++ ::I need to have dinner - my brain isn't working. Didn't you mean 50% to James for publishing, 50% to lenmac, then the Lenmac further divided btwn Epstein Lennon and Mac?  Dinner. definitely. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small> [[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 00:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

546581 +++$+++ Springnuts +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546581 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-09 20:09:00 +++$+++ 1.228882140E09 +++$+++ Nice edit - thanks.   +++$+++ Nice edit - thanks.  [[User:Springnuts|Springnuts]] ([[User talk:Springnuts|talk]]) 20:09, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
546582 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546581 +++$+++ 546581 +++$+++ 2008-12-09 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.228891260E09 +++$+++ No problem at all. And thank you for noticing. I appreciate that. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :No problem at all. And thank you for noticing. I appreciate that. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 22:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

22294 +++$+++ Millahnna +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22294 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-06 04:56:00 +++$+++ 1.299416160E09 +++$+++ Let me know when your article goes live; I watch all the other pages related to that show so I might as well round out my collection.  :D  +++$+++ Let me know when your article goes live; I watch all the other pages related to that show so I might as well round out my collection.  :D [[User:Millahnna|Millahnna]] ([[User talk:Millahnna|talk]]) 04:56, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
22295 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22294 +++$+++ 22294 +++$+++ 2011-03-06 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.299416400E09 +++$+++ Oh, okay.  That makes sense.  I'll remove them as I go (they help me a little with the writing), but thanks for the tip!  +++$+++ :Oh, okay.  That makes sense.  I'll remove them as I go (they help me a little with the writing), but thanks for the tip! [[User:Kevinbrogers|Kevinbrogers]] ([[User talk:Kevinbrogers#top|talk]]) 05:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

284439 +++$+++ HailFire +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284439 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-01 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.170361860E09 +++$+++ I think you know it is unusual for me to continue at length about my views in any talk page posting (I don't aim to frustrate anyone, it is just my introverted nature to be that way).  I am making an exception here because of the respect I have for your commitment, contributions, and continuing collaboration. Can we find middle ground? -- +++$+++ I think you know it is unusual for me to continue at length about my views in any talk page posting (I don't aim to frustrate anyone, it is just my introverted nature to be that way).  I am making an exception here because of the respect I have for your commitment, contributions, and continuing collaboration. Can we find middle ground? --[[User:HailFire|HailFire]] 12:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
284440 +++$+++ HailFire +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284439 +++$+++ 284439 +++$+++ 2007-03-07 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.173258420E09 +++$+++ I've added [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&oldid=113203316 a note] on the talk page which I hope explains my reasoning and my preference for the more informative sprot template. -- +++$+++ :I've added [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&oldid=113203316 a note] on the talk page which I hope explains my reasoning and my preference for the more informative sprot template. --[[User:HailFire|HailFire]] 01:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

546584 +++$+++ 68.34.4.143 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546584 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-12 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.229081280E09 +++$+++ '''P.S. You can put it on you user page.''' [[Special:Contributions\/68.34.4.143|68.34.4.143]] ( +++$+++ '''P.S. You can put it on you user page.''' [[Special:Contributions/68.34.4.143|68.34.4.143]] ([[User talk:68.34.4.143|talk]]) 03:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
546585 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546584 +++$+++ 546584 +++$+++ 2008-12-12 09:11:00 +++$+++ 1.229101860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the nice award. I appreciate the thoughtfulness.  By the way, I would encourage you to read the page [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?]] -- then go ahead and make an account for yourself here on Wikipedia.  You have been working to edit pages for more than a few months now. So why not make it official?  You can become a part of the community of editors.  In that way, you can learn more easily how to build pages and find good references, etc. -- as well as learning the things to avoid when writing these encyclopedia articles. (Although it takes a little time, learning that kind of stuff will definitely help you to avoid the warnings that you have found on your talk page).  I hope you will consider this.  Thanks again. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Thanks for the nice award. I appreciate the thoughtfulness.  By the way, I would encourage you to read the page [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?]] -- then go ahead and make an account for yourself here on Wikipedia.  You have been working to edit pages for more than a few months now. So why not make it official?  You can become a part of the community of editors.  In that way, you can learn more easily how to build pages and find good references, etc. -- as well as learning the things to avoid when writing these encyclopedia articles. (Although it takes a little time, learning that kind of stuff will definitely help you to avoid the warnings that you have found on your talk page).  I hope you will consider this.  Thanks again. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 09:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

284442 +++$+++ Ckatz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284442 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-07 03:04:00 +++$+++ 1.170846240E09 +++$+++ Hello... I saw your request at the Village Pump. There is some code you can add to your monobook.js file to add an \"unwatch\" link to your watchlist. You can find it [[User:Ilmari Karonen\/unwatch.js|here]]. I installed it a few weeks back, and haven't encountered any problems to date. Cheers. --''' +++$+++ Hello... I saw your request at the Village Pump. There is some code you can add to your monobook.js file to add an "unwatch" link to your watchlist. You can find it [[User:Ilmari Karonen/unwatch.js|here]]. I installed it a few weeks back, and haven't encountered any problems to date. Cheers. --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 03:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
284443 +++$+++ Ckatz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284442 +++$+++ 284442 +++$+++ 2007-02-07 03:15:00 +++$+++ 1.170846900E09 +++$+++ It's pretty much a cut-and-paste edit. You copy the text in the box at [[User:Ilmari Karonen\/unwatch.js|Ilmari Karonen's page]] into your monobook.js file at [[User:Tvoz\/monobook.js]], making sure not to delete anything that's already in there. You then save that edit, and flush out your Internat browser's cache to see the changes. (For Firefox\/Mozilla\/Safari: hold down \"shift\" while clicking RELOAD (or press Ctrl-Shift-R); for Internet Explorer: press Ctrl-F5; for Opera\/Konqueror: press F5.) The \"un\" tag will show up on your watchlist next to items; clicking it removes the article. If you decide you want to remove the code, the easiest way is to revert yourself or undo the specific edit where you added this code. Good luck~ --''' +++$+++ :It's pretty much a cut-and-paste edit. You copy the text in the box at [[User:Ilmari Karonen/unwatch.js|Ilmari Karonen's page]] into your monobook.js file at [[User:Tvoz/monobook.js]], making sure not to delete anything that's already in there. You then save that edit, and flush out your Internat browser's cache to see the changes. (For Firefox/Mozilla/Safari: hold down "shift" while clicking RELOAD (or press Ctrl-Shift-R); for Internet Explorer: press Ctrl-F5; for Opera/Konqueror: press F5.) The "un" tag will show up on your watchlist next to items; clicking it removes the article. If you decide you want to remove the code, the easiest way is to revert yourself or undo the specific edit where you added this code. Good luck~ --'''[[User:Ckatz|Ckatz]]'''''<small><sup>[[User_talk:Ckatz|<font color="green">chat</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ckatz|<font color="red">spy</font>]]</sub></small>'' 03:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

546587 +++$+++ Ipigott +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546587 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-21 16:45:00 +++$+++ 1.229906700E09 +++$+++ Hello CactusWriter. Of all those involved in Project Denmark, you seem to be one of the few to have a real interest in culture, especially the cinema. Over the past two or three weeks I've been doing quite a bit of work on [[Culture of Denmark]] and several related articles. I would much appreciate your contributions, comments, corrections to the article, especially the section on the cinema. And if you are interested in art, take a look at [[Art of Denmark]] too. Thanks in advance.- +++$+++ Hello CactusWriter. Of all those involved in Project Denmark, you seem to be one of the few to have a real interest in culture, especially the cinema. Over the past two or three weeks I've been doing quite a bit of work on [[Culture of Denmark]] and several related articles. I would much appreciate your contributions, comments, corrections to the article, especially the section on the cinema. And if you are interested in art, take a look at [[Art of Denmark]] too. Thanks in advance.-[[User:Ipigott|Ipigott]] ([[User talk:Ipigott|talk]]) 16:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
546588 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546587 +++$+++ 546587 +++$+++ 2008-12-31 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.230793620E09 +++$+++ Sorry I've taken so long to reply to your request, but I've been on a bit of a break over the holidays. (...am currently still on it, actually). However, I'll add a brief overview of Danish cinema to the [[Culture of Denmark]] article in the next day or so. I'll have more time to take a closer look at the two articles in a couple of weeks, but on a first perusal, I think you are doing a tremendous job on the rewrite and referencing. They are much improved. Thanks for the great work. Cheers <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Sorry I've taken so long to reply to your request, but I've been on a bit of a break over the holidays. (...am currently still on it, actually). However, I'll add a brief overview of Danish cinema to the [[Culture of Denmark]] article in the next day or so. I'll have more time to take a closer look at the two articles in a couple of weeks, but on a first perusal, I think you are doing a tremendous job on the rewrite and referencing. They are much improved. Thanks for the great work. Cheers <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 23:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

284444 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-02-10 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.171179240E09 +++$+++ ...and now I know why; You do not get the Beatles newsletter. I am sure that the editors meant it in the most affectionate way possible (in truth, I know I did!)  +++$+++ ...and now I know why; You do not get the Beatles newsletter. I am sure that the editors meant it in the most affectionate way possible (in truth, I know I did!) [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 23:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
284445 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284444 +++$+++ 284444 +++$+++ 2007-02-11 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.171234140E09 +++$+++ It seems that you are going to be busy with the Obama article for a while! I will pass on your thoughts to Sir Sean, Fireman VCD, and TykeMaster.  +++$+++ :It seems that you are going to be busy with the Obama article for a while! I will pass on your thoughts to Sir Sean, Fireman VCD, and TykeMaster. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 14:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

546589 +++$+++ 68.34.4.143 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546589 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-15 19:24:00 +++$+++ 1.232076240E09 +++$+++ [[:File:HesABullyCharlieBrown.jpg|This]] Image needs to be replaced with a screenshot of the title, is there anybody who is able to accept my request? [[Special:Contributions\/68.34.4.143|68.34.4.143]] ( +++$+++ [[:File:HesABullyCharlieBrown.jpg|This]] Image needs to be replaced with a screenshot of the title, is there anybody who is able to accept my request? [[Special:Contributions/68.34.4.143|68.34.4.143]] ([[User talk:68.34.4.143|talk]]) 19:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
546590 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546589 +++$+++ 546589 +++$+++ 2008-12-31 22:46:00 +++$+++ 1.230792360E09 +++$+++ Can you explain why one screenshot of the program needs to be replaced by another screenshot from the program? I don't understand your reasoning for this. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Can you explain why one screenshot of the program needs to be replaced by another screenshot from the program? I don't understand your reasoning for this. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 22:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

22302 +++$+++ DReifGalaxyM31 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22302 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-18 03:26:00 +++$+++ 1.303122360E09 +++$+++ As you can tell, I obviously filled out a few of the pages on my own as you hadn't come around to doing them.  +++$+++ As you can tell, I obviously filled out a few of the pages on my own as you hadn't come around to doing them. [[User:DReifGalaxyM31|DReifGalaxyM31]] ([[User talk:DReifGalaxyM31|talk]]) 03:26, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
22303 +++$+++ Wifione +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22302 +++$+++ 22302 +++$+++ 2011-04-18 18:34:00 +++$+++ 1.303176840E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing![[User:Wifione|'''<span style="color: red; 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em">   Wifione   </span>''']] [[User talk:Wifione|'''<sub style="font-size: 60%">.......</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex"> Leave a message</sup>''']] 18:34, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

528005 +++$+++ Anetode +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528005 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-02 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.186064880E09 +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Image:Microsoft-Staff-1978.jpg}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Image:Microsoft-Staff-1978.jpg]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Please note that I am requesting the undeletion of this image for use in [[History of Microsoft]] only, as per the rationale. \u02c9\u02c9<sup> +++$+++ An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Image:Microsoft-Staff-1978.jpg}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Image:Microsoft-Staff-1978.jpg]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Please note that I am requesting the undeletion of this image for use in [[History of Microsoft]] only, as per the rationale. ˉˉ<sup>[[User:Anetode|'''anetode''']]</sup>[[User_talk:Anetode|╦╩]] 07:28, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
528006 +++$+++ Anetode +++$+++ ^demon +++$+++ 528005 +++$+++ 528005 +++$+++ 2007-08-03 02:38:00 +++$+++ 1.186133880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for taking a look. As Storm Surfer said, asking you first would have probably saved the trouble of setting up a DRV to begin with. \u02c9\u02c9<sup> +++$+++ :Thanks for taking a look. As Storm Surfer said, asking you first would have probably saved the trouble of setting up a DRV to begin with. ˉˉ<sup>[[User:Anetode|'''anetode''']]</sup>[[User_talk:Anetode|╦╩]] 02:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

546592 +++$+++ Tyciol +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546592 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-06 22:31:00 +++$+++ 1.231309860E09 +++$+++ I noticed your warning on [[User_talk:205.125.19.88]], this guy has been vandalizing another old cartoon article as well, how can we put a stop to this? Is there a way to tag the IPs (there are 2) so a mod will stop them?  +++$+++ I noticed your warning on [[User_talk:205.125.19.88]], this guy has been vandalizing another old cartoon article as well, how can we put a stop to this? Is there a way to tag the IPs (there are 2) so a mod will stop them? [[User:Tyciol|Tyciol]] ([[User talk:Tyciol|talk]]) 22:31, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
546593 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546592 +++$+++ 546592 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 22:40:00 +++$+++ 1.231310400E09 +++$+++ It is often difficult to stop the IP vandals until they have made repeated attacks on articles. The one you mention has only been active today with three reversions - and, unfortunately, that isn't usually quite enough for a block yet. If any IP address needs to be continually reverted (say, 4 or 5 times in a short period) than you should place a report at [[WP:AIV]] so that they can be blocked. Cheers - <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :It is often difficult to stop the IP vandals until they have made repeated attacks on articles. The one you mention has only been active today with three reversions - and, unfortunately, that isn't usually quite enough for a block yet. If any IP address needs to be continually reverted (say, 4 or 5 times in a short period) than you should place a report at [[WP:AIV]] so that they can be blocked. Cheers - <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 22:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

80455 +++$+++ Sjschen +++$+++ Sjschen +++$+++ 80455 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-14 21:26:00 +++$+++ 1.231997160E09 +++$+++ Replied to this at [[User_talk:Moonriddengirl#About_the_copyright_violation]]  +++$+++ Replied to this at [[User_talk:Moonriddengirl#About_the_copyright_violation]] [[User:Sjschen|Sjschen]] ([[User talk:Sjschen#top|talk]]) 21:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
80456 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ Sjschen +++$+++ 80455 +++$+++ 80455 +++$+++ 2009-01-14 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.231999080E09 +++$+++ Sorry for my mistake. I've replied to you [[User_talk:Moonriddengirl#About_the_copyright_violation|there]]. -- +++$+++ :Sorry for my mistake. I've replied to you [[User_talk:Moonriddengirl#About_the_copyright_violation|there]]. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 21:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

284450 +++$+++ Geni +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284450 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-03 13:01:00 +++$+++ 1.172955660E09 +++$+++ Its a good idea so for the most part the go ahead and do it aproach appears to be working. +++$+++ Its a good idea so for the most part the go ahead and do it aproach appears to be working.[[User:Geni|Geni]] 13:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
284451 +++$+++ wknight94 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284450 +++$+++ 284450 +++$+++ 2007-03-03 13:25:00 +++$+++ 1.172957100E09 +++$+++ FYI, I've posted a comment\/question at [[Wikipedia talk:Fair use#No free image available]].  \u2014 +++$+++ :FYI, I've posted a comment/question at [[Wikipedia talk:Fair use#No free image available]].  —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 13:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

284452 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-10 04:12:00 +++$+++ 1.173528720E09 +++$+++ I guess I was too late. <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ I guess I was too late. <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 04:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
284453 +++$+++ Khoikhoi +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284452 +++$+++ 284452 +++$+++ 2007-03-10 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.173530940E09 +++$+++ I reverted the anon (hence making me involved), so I wouldn't have been able to have intervened. However, if I was uninvolved, I would probably have blocked both, or at least fully protected the page (see [[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Semi-protection]]). It's not a big deal anyways. Thanks for your kind words. :-) <tt class=\"plainlinks\"> +++$+++ :I reverted the anon (hence making me involved), so I wouldn't have been able to have intervened. However, if I was uninvolved, I would probably have blocked both, or at least fully protected the page (see [[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Semi-protection]]). It's not a big deal anyways. Thanks for your kind words. :-) <tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Khoikhoi|Khoi]][[User talk:Khoikhoi|khoi]]</tt> 04:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

284454 +++$+++ CambridgeBayWeather +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284454 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-11 05:46:00 +++$+++ 1.173617160E09 +++$+++ I'd just noticed that and was off to block him when I got your message. Gone for 24 hours now.  +++$+++ I'd just noticed that and was off to block him when I got your message. Gone for 24 hours now. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 05:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
284455 +++$+++ Wowaconia +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284454 +++$+++ 284454 +++$+++ 2007-03-12 07:24:00 +++$+++ 1.173709440E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ :--[[User:Wowaconia|Wowaconia]] 07:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

22311 +++$+++ Boycool42 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22311 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-05-28 13:54:00 +++$+++ 1.306616040E09 +++$+++ The White Collar pilot looks good. I tweaked the sentence in the lead about Nielsen ratings, because Arthur Nielsen is very, very dead. The caption about Tim DeKay's performance should probably be sourced. I'm expanding the ''Chuck'' pilot, so this was actually a lot of help on that. -- +++$+++ The White Collar pilot looks good. I tweaked the sentence in the lead about Nielsen ratings, because Arthur Nielsen is very, very dead. The caption about Tim DeKay's performance should probably be sourced. I'm expanding the ''Chuck'' pilot, so this was actually a lot of help on that. --[[User:Boycool42|Boycool]] ([[User talk:Boycool42|talk]]) 13:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
22312 +++$+++ Boycool42 +++$+++ Kevinbrogers +++$+++ 22311 +++$+++ 22311 +++$+++ 2011-05-28 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.306646580E09 +++$+++ Also, I unlinked the second reference to [[NBC]] in the \"Production\" section of [[Pilot (White Collar)|Pilot (''White Collar'')]]. Speaking of production sections, that of of ''[[Burn Notice: The Fall of Sam Axe]]'' might not have enough information to be divided into subsections. -- +++$+++ :Also, I unlinked the second reference to [[NBC]] in the "Production" section of [[Pilot (White Collar)|Pilot (''White Collar'')]]. Speaking of production sections, that of of ''[[Burn Notice: The Fall of Sam Axe]]'' might not have enough information to be divided into subsections. --[[User:Boycool42|Boycool]] ([[User talk:Boycool42|talk]]) 22:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

546600 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546600 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-14 05:05:00 +++$+++ 1.231938300E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"Image\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 05:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
546601 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546600 +++$+++ 546600 +++$+++ 2009-01-14 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.231956660E09 +++$+++ {{done}} The [[Dogville]] DVD cover image has been repaced with an image of the original movie poster. Since the poster is the preferable image for movie articles, I've requested a G7 CSD of my old upload. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :{{done}} The [[Dogville]] DVD cover image has been repaced with an image of the original movie poster. Since the poster is the preferable image for movie articles, I've requested a G7 CSD of my old upload. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 10:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

546602 +++$+++ Hoary +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-17 10:23:00 +++$+++ 1.232216580E09 +++$+++ Feel free to reply or not to reply; if you reply, please do so here. --  +++$+++ Feel free to reply or not to reply; if you reply, please do so here. -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary|talk]]) 10:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
546603 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546602 +++$+++ 546602 +++$+++ 2009-01-18 16:07:00 +++$+++ 1.232323620E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I think you've done much more than the article deserves. You were actually kinder in your editing than I would have been. I went ahead and made a few more deletions and revisions. After this passes Afd, I'll keep it watch listed and, if no citations turn up for those fact tags (proper cites, that is), I'll remove more of the extraneous commentary. These \"self=promotional\" articles on borderline notability types can definitely wear you down. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Thanks. I think you've done much more than the article deserves. You were actually kinder in your editing than I would have been. I went ahead and made a few more deletions and revisions. After this passes Afd, I'll keep it watch listed and, if no citations turn up for those fact tags (proper cites, that is), I'll remove more of the extraneous commentary. These "self=promotional" articles on borderline notability types can definitely wear you down. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 16:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

265863 +++$+++ Addhoc +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265863 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-29 20:35:00 +++$+++ 1.164861300E09 +++$+++ Hi, could I recommend that you contact the AMA to request assistance?  +++$+++ Hi, could I recommend that you contact the AMA to request assistance? [[User:Addhoc|Addhoc]] 20:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265864 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265863 +++$+++ 265863 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 22:51:00 +++$+++ 1.164869460E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  My advice is to complete the process of requesting an advocate.  I think it is important that the advocate system be neutral.  If you end up getting Geo, it obviously would not be neutral.  I would tend to believe that s\/he would not be so bold.  However, in the unfortunate event that you did not get a neutral advocate, at least your efforts could be put to the good use of fixing a problem with the advocate system.  In any event, I don't think any harm could come from completing the application.  My friendly opinion.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :Hi Mattisse.  My advice is to complete the process of requesting an advocate.  I think it is important that the advocate system be neutral.  If you end up getting Geo, it obviously would not be neutral.  I would tend to believe that s/he would not be so bold.  However, in the unfortunate event that you did not get a neutral advocate, at least your efforts could be put to the good use of fixing a problem with the advocate system.  In any event, I don't think any harm could come from completing the application.  My friendly opinion.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265865 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265863 +++$+++ 265864 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 23:02:00 +++$+++ 1.164870120E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  yes, I think you should complete the application.  Then if you are assigned Geo as an advocate, we can go to the advocate people and say, \"look, you've got a problem\".  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ ::Hi Mattisse.  yes, I think you should complete the application.  Then if you are assigned Geo as an advocate, we can go to the advocate people and say, "look, you've got a problem".  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 23:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265866 +++$+++ Kathryn_NicDhàna +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265863 +++$+++ 265865 +++$+++ 2006-11-29 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.164870540E09 +++$+++ I agree.  Even if an oversight led to an initial assignment of Geo, no one who has observed his recent behaviour in this matter would keep him on the case.  Can you specifically request Addhoc be assigned?  Or someone Addhoc recommends? -- +++$+++ :::I agree.  Even if an oversight led to an initial assignment of Geo, no one who has observed his recent behaviour in this matter would keep him on the case.  Can you specifically request Addhoc be assigned?  Or someone Addhoc recommends? --[[User:Kathryn NicDhàna|Kathryn NicDhàna]][[User_talk:Kathryn NicDhàna|♫]]<font color="navy">♦</font>[[Special:Contributions/Kathryn_NicDhàna|♫]] 23:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
265867 +++$+++ Addhoc +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265863 +++$+++ 265863 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 11:34:00 +++$+++ 1.164915240E09 +++$+++ Hi, thanks for filling out the AMA form and I've accepted the case.  +++$+++ :Hi, thanks for filling out the AMA form and I've accepted the case. [[User:Addhoc|Addhoc]] 11:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

284460 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-19 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.174338300E09 +++$+++ Hi Tvoz. Blocked users are not automatically given a notice on their talk page, but will always see a special message when they try to edit. I do try to post a block message on their user talk for the convenience of other users, but blocks are recorded in a user's block log whether a template is place on their talk page. I've added one in this case. Hope that clarifies.  +++$+++ Hi Tvoz. Blocked users are not automatically given a notice on their talk page, but will always see a special message when they try to edit. I do try to post a block message on their user talk for the convenience of other users, but blocks are recorded in a user's block log whether a template is place on their talk page. I've added one in this case. Hope that clarifies. [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Xiner|email]]) 14:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
284461 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284460 +++$+++ 284460 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.174343220E09 +++$+++ Btw, the AIV bot works by examining the block log of the users or IPs reported on AIV. If someone has been blocked, the bot removes the entry from the AIV page. This way admins don't have to manually edit the AIV page when they enact a block. Hope that clarifies.  +++$+++ :Btw, the AIV bot works by examining the block log of the users or IPs reported on AIV. If someone has been blocked, the bot removes the entry from the AIV page. This way admins don't have to manually edit the AIV page when they enact a block. Hope that clarifies. [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Xiner|email]]) 15:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
284462 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284460 +++$+++ 284461 +++$+++ 2007-03-19 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.174355520E09 +++$+++ Maybe that's a bot or feature that you can request. I can't see a reason why that isn't done.  +++$+++ ::Maybe that's a bot or feature that you can request. I can't see a reason why that isn't done. [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[Special:Emailuser/Xiner|email]]) 18:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

47410 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47410 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-16 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.221584040E09 +++$+++ BTW I checked [http:\/\/db.chessmetrics.com\/CM2\/PlayerProfile.asp?Params=199510SSSSS3S073076000000111000000000000010100 Chessmetrics Player Profile:     Emanuel Lasker]. The 2 dips in his ranking correspond to \"vacations\" from competitive chess, e.g. from 1910-1913 he played no tournaments and only the one match, against Schlechter. In the mid-1800s, when events were infrequent, Chessmetrics' penalty for inactivity would hurt absolute ratings but possibly not rankings ([http:\/\/db.chessmetrics.com\/CM2\/PlayerProfile.asp?Params=199510SSSSS3S088959000000111000000000019610100 Paul Morphy] ranked number 1 in Nov 1861!). But in the early 1900s everyone else was playing flat out, so the inactivity penalty bit Lasker hard. Sonas says this is an intentional feature, to prevent players from protectig rankings by taking long breaks, which the Elo system allows. --  +++$+++ BTW I checked [http://db.chessmetrics.com/CM2/PlayerProfile.asp?Params=199510SSSSS3S073076000000111000000000000010100 Chessmetrics Player Profile:     Emanuel Lasker]. The 2 dips in his ranking correspond to "vacations" from competitive chess, e.g. from 1910-1913 he played no tournaments and only the one match, against Schlechter. In the mid-1800s, when events were infrequent, Chessmetrics' penalty for inactivity would hurt absolute ratings but possibly not rankings ([http://db.chessmetrics.com/CM2/PlayerProfile.asp?Params=199510SSSSS3S088959000000111000000000019610100 Paul Morphy] ranked number 1 in Nov 1861!). But in the early 1900s everyone else was playing flat out, so the inactivity penalty bit Lasker hard. Sonas says this is an intentional feature, to prevent players from protectig rankings by taking long breaks, which the Elo system allows. -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 09:54, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
47411 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47410 +++$+++ 47410 +++$+++ 2008-09-17 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.221646800E09 +++$+++ I know Chessmetrics has this feature, but if you're the best, you're the best . . . . Of course, these days there are way more players near the top, so maybe one would cease being the top player after a period of inactivity.  +++$+++ :I know Chessmetrics has this feature, but if you're the best, you're the best . . . . Of course, these days there are way more players near the top, so maybe one would cease being the top player after a period of inactivity. [[User:Krakatoa|Krakatoa]] ([[User talk:Krakatoa#top|talk]]) 03:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
47412 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47410 +++$+++ 47411 +++$+++ 2008-09-17 10:53:00 +++$+++ 1.221673980E09 +++$+++ \"if you're the best, you're the best\" - e.g. that part-timer Steinitz :-) --  +++$+++ ::"if you're the best, you're the best" - e.g. that part-timer Steinitz :-) -- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 10:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
47413 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47410 +++$+++ 47412 +++$+++ 2008-09-18 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.221739380E09 +++$+++ True, in Lasker and Steinitz's day it was much more normal for top players not to play for long periods (Fischer also did that). Of course, unlike today, L and S didn't have tons of strong (and lucrative) tournaments to play in.  +++$+++ :::True, in Lasker and Steinitz's day it was much more normal for top players not to play for long periods (Fischer also did that). Of course, unlike today, L and S didn't have tons of strong (and lucrative) tournaments to play in. [[User:Krakatoa|Krakatoa]] ([[User talk:Krakatoa#top|talk]]) 05:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
47414 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47410 +++$+++ 47413 +++$+++ 2008-09-18 09:54:00 +++$+++ 1.221756840E09 +++$+++ I think it would be truer to say that the late 19th century was a transition period. [[Joseph Henry Blackburne]] was a full-time pro who averaged about a tournament a year; one would have to analyse his finances (if records survive) to see whether tournaments were profitable for him or whether they were the \"advertising\" that kept his exhibitions business profitable. [[Adolf Anderssen]] was a prolific tournament player in the final stages of his career. Some thought [[Wilhelm Steinitz]] forfeited his claim to the title \"world champion\" when he took a \"vacation\" in the mid-1870s. It looks to me like Steinitz and Lasker were below average in tournament participation because of their other interests (chess theory and maths + philosophy respectively). Steinitz actually dropped right out of Chessmetric's rankings aug 1877 to May 1882 ([http:\/\/db.chessmetrics.com\/CM2\/PlayerProfile.asp?Params=199510SSSSS3S126127000000131000000000028210100]).--  +++$+++ ::::I think it would be truer to say that the late 19th century was a transition period. [[Joseph Henry Blackburne]] was a full-time pro who averaged about a tournament a year; one would have to analyse his finances (if records survive) to see whether tournaments were profitable for him or whether they were the "advertising" that kept his exhibitions business profitable. [[Adolf Anderssen]] was a prolific tournament player in the final stages of his career. Some thought [[Wilhelm Steinitz]] forfeited his claim to the title "world champion" when he took a "vacation" in the mid-1870s. It looks to me like Steinitz and Lasker were below average in tournament participation because of their other interests (chess theory and maths + philosophy respectively). Steinitz actually dropped right out of Chessmetric's rankings aug 1877 to May 1882 ([http://db.chessmetrics.com/CM2/PlayerProfile.asp?Params=199510SSSSS3S126127000000131000000000028210100]).-- [[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 09:54, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

284463 +++$+++ NYC JD +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284463 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-21 03:00:00 +++$+++ 1.174471200E09 +++$+++ Obvious username policy violations such as this one should go to [[WP:AN]], [[WP:AIAV]], or to the talk page of any friendly admin who is online at the moment. Where a violation is debatable, a discussion could be held at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\/User names]] - <b> +++$+++ Obvious username policy violations such as this one should go to [[WP:AN]], [[WP:AIAV]], or to the talk page of any friendly admin who is online at the moment. Where a violation is debatable, a discussion could be held at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names]] - <b>[[User:NYC JD|NYC JD]]</b><small> [[User_talk:NYC JD|(interrogatories)]]</small> 03:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
284464 +++$+++ NYC JD +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284463 +++$+++ 284463 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 03:55:00 +++$+++ 1.174474500E09 +++$+++ This is a state secret and you're unworthy... ''Oh fine...'' [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete When in trouble, click here] - <b> +++$+++ :This is a state secret and you're unworthy... ''Oh fine...'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete When in trouble, click here] - <b>[[User:NYC JD|NYC JD]]</b><small> [[User_talk:NYC JD|(interrogatories)]]</small> 03:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
284465 +++$+++ NYC JD +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284463 +++$+++ 284464 +++$+++ 2007-03-21 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.174474920E09 +++$+++ Oohh Yiddish... Did you learn it in Bronx Science? Too bad it wasn't offered at Stuy when I went there (''blows raspberry'') - <b> +++$+++ ::Oohh Yiddish... Did you learn it in Bronx Science? Too bad it wasn't offered at Stuy when I went there (''blows raspberry'') - <b>[[User:NYC JD|NYC JD]]</b><small> [[User_talk:NYC JD|(interrogatories)]]</small> 04:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
284466 +++$+++ Dereks1x +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284463 +++$+++ 284463 +++$+++ 2007-03-23 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.174705920E09 +++$+++ Please do not keep reverting changes about Obama's law firm.  The old version had a blanket and potentially misleading statement that he was a civil rights lawyer.  His cases were mostly employment cases.  The new language has been developed as a compromise by several editors but you, Tvoz, all of sudden changed it back to the old wording.  The compromise language had been there for a few days.  Even wiki's policy is to revise, not blanket revert it back.  What do you have against a neutral and verified description of obama's legal career?  Please stop this!  +++$+++ *Please do not keep reverting changes about Obama's law firm.  The old version had a blanket and potentially misleading statement that he was a civil rights lawyer.  His cases were mostly employment cases.  The new language has been developed as a compromise by several editors but you, Tvoz, all of sudden changed it back to the old wording.  The compromise language had been there for a few days.  Even wiki's policy is to revise, not blanket revert it back.  What do you have against a neutral and verified description of obama's legal career?  Please stop this! [[User:Dereks1x|Dereks1x]] 20:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

284467 +++$+++ Dereks1x +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284467 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-23 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.174705980E09 +++$+++ I've revised it even more to add some of your ideas about civil rights law!  Be happy! +++$+++ I've revised it even more to add some of your ideas about civil rights law!  Be happy![[User:Dereks1x|Dereks1x]] 20:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
284468 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284467 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-03-24 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.174783560E09 +++$+++ go to article talk page please <strong> +++$+++ ::go to article talk page please <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small> [[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 17:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

546612 +++$+++ 98.218.94.104 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546612 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-21 23:59:00 +++$+++ 1.232611140E09 +++$+++ You know my fear to reported to [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism|Administrator intervention against vandalism]]! Can you help me in this? [[Special:Contributions\/98.218.94.104|98.218.94.104]] ( +++$+++ You know my fear to reported to [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism|Administrator intervention against vandalism]]! Can you help me in this? [[Special:Contributions/98.218.94.104|98.218.94.104]] ([[User talk:98.218.94.104|talk]]) 23:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
546613 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546612 +++$+++ 546612 +++$+++ 2009-01-22 09:02:00 +++$+++ 1.232643720E09 +++$+++ It is important to understand that Wikipedia operates on a principle of [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus opinion]]. And consensus is found through a discussion by editors. In the case of the [[Lila (Peanuts)]] character, a discussion was held at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/Lila (Peanuts)]] and there was a clear consensus that the character should not have a separate page, but rather should be merged. It was merged into [[Snoopy, Come Home]]. This is reasonable because on any page where Lila appears in a plot, the name can be linked to the information and when someone searches on WP for Lila they will still be directed to the correct info. Although you may disagree with the consensus, you still need to yield to it. There have been plenty of Afd discussions in which I also found myself on the opposite side of the final consensus. Every editor who works on WP does at some time or another. But we say \"Okay\", take a breath, and move on. When someone refuses to move on, it is considered disruptive to the project. So, in all fairness and consideration to your fellow editors, it is wise to simply move on. There are plenty of other places to help edit. Good luck. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :It is important to understand that Wikipedia operates on a principle of [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus opinion]]. And consensus is found through a discussion by editors. In the case of the [[Lila (Peanuts)]] character, a discussion was held at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lila (Peanuts)]] and there was a clear consensus that the character should not have a separate page, but rather should be merged. It was merged into [[Snoopy, Come Home]]. This is reasonable because on any page where Lila appears in a plot, the name can be linked to the information and when someone searches on WP for Lila they will still be directed to the correct info. Although you may disagree with the consensus, you still need to yield to it. There have been plenty of Afd discussions in which I also found myself on the opposite side of the final consensus. Every editor who works on WP does at some time or another. But we say "Okay", take a breath, and move on. When someone refuses to move on, it is considered disruptive to the project. So, in all fairness and consideration to your fellow editors, it is wise to simply move on. There are plenty of other places to help edit. Good luck. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 09:02, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

284470 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284470 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-25 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.174879440E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets\/Dereks1x]].  Any comments would be appreciated. \xb7 '''<font color=\"#709070\"> +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dereks1x]].  Any comments would be appreciated. · '''<font color="#709070">[[User:Jersyko|j e r s y k o]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' · 20:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
284471 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284470 +++$+++ 284470 +++$+++ 2007-03-26 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.174947120E09 +++$+++ Nice work.  I included a diff to your edit in the RFCU.  On a different note, now we have [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser\/Case\/Jersyko|this]], which is obviously going to be summarily declined. \xb7 '''<font color=\"#709070\"> +++$+++ :Nice work.  I included a diff to your edit in the RFCU.  On a different note, now we have [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jersyko|this]], which is obviously going to be summarily declined. · '''<font color="#709070">[[User:Jersyko|j e r s y k o]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' · 15:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

546615 +++$+++ Padres Hana +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546615 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-02 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.233639780E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the excellent make over on Thomas C. Wasson. I have corrected a confusion between the New York Post and the New York Times. Bravo. +++$+++ Thank you for the excellent make over on Thomas C. Wasson. I have corrected a confusion between the New York Post and the New York Times. Bravo.[[User:Padres Hana|Padres Hana]] ([[User talk:Padres Hana|talk]]) 21:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
546616 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546615 +++$+++ 546615 +++$+++ 2009-02-03 10:17:00 +++$+++ 1.233685020E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. I'm happy to help. By the way, since you seem to have a particular interest in the Palestine-Israel conflict, I would think you might like to join one or more of the Wikiprojects that focus on that area. Perhaps [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Israel]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Palestine]] or [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration]]. You'll find a lot of people with whom to collaborate. Good luck with future articles. Cheers <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :You're welcome. I'm happy to help. By the way, since you seem to have a particular interest in the Palestine-Israel conflict, I would think you might like to join one or more of the Wikiprojects that focus on that area. Perhaps [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Israel]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Palestine]] or [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration]]. You'll find a lot of people with whom to collaborate. Good luck with future articles. Cheers <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 10:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
546617 +++$+++ Padres Hana +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546615 +++$+++ 546616 +++$+++ 2009-02-04 23:00:00 +++$+++ 1.233817200E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the advice - as a newcomer I am finding it a bit awesome. If you have time could you advise me about the speedy deletion I got? User:Padres Hana\/Eva Ducas. All the best +++$+++ ::Thanks for the advice - as a newcomer I am finding it a bit awesome. If you have time could you advise me about the speedy deletion I got? User:Padres Hana/Eva Ducas. All the best[[User:Padres Hana|Padres Hana]] ([[User talk:Padres Hana|talk]]) 23:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
546618 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546615 +++$+++ 546617 +++$+++ 2009-02-05 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.233870540E09 +++$+++ I looked at the Eva Ducas article -- deleted because it failed the assertion of notability -- and I agree with that assessment. The references indicate she was only briefly mentioned in the press at the time of her death, and in Levin's published diary. That cannot be considered [[WP:GNG|significant coverage]], which, unfortunately is the case of almost all the 2500 Israeli casualties during that time period. In an encyclopedic sense (and only an encyclopedic sense), it appears Ducas has had no significant or lasting impact. Look at [[Esther Cailingold]] as a similar example. She is also mentioned in Levin's diary, but easily passes notability because of the biography about her as well as the commemorations and memorials in her name. I'm afraid a stand alone bio of Eva Ducas simply isn't warranted. On the other hand, I see that WP is missing a bio on Harry Levin who's notable not only as a middle-east correspondent and for his published diary, but he became the first general consul for Israel in Australia. Cheers. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::I looked at the Eva Ducas article -- deleted because it failed the assertion of notability -- and I agree with that assessment. The references indicate she was only briefly mentioned in the press at the time of her death, and in Levin's published diary. That cannot be considered [[WP:GNG|significant coverage]], which, unfortunately is the case of almost all the 2500 Israeli casualties during that time period. In an encyclopedic sense (and only an encyclopedic sense), it appears Ducas has had no significant or lasting impact. Look at [[Esther Cailingold]] as a similar example. She is also mentioned in Levin's diary, but easily passes notability because of the biography about her as well as the commemorations and memorials in her name. I'm afraid a stand alone bio of Eva Ducas simply isn't warranted. On the other hand, I see that WP is missing a bio on Harry Levin who's notable not only as a middle-east correspondent and for his published diary, but he became the first general consul for Israel in Australia. Cheers. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 13:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
546619 +++$+++ Padres Hana +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546615 +++$+++ 546618 +++$+++ 2009-02-06 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.233987960E09 +++$+++ Yes but did Esther Cailingod have a poster on a Jerusalem wall that was still readable seven weeks after her death? It would suggest that a lot of people knew Eva Ducas' story at the time. Perhaps I will find another way to have her remebered. I see an omission in Esther's bio. I'll gather my references! +++$+++ ::::Yes but did Esther Cailingod have a poster on a Jerusalem wall that was still readable seven weeks after her death? It would suggest that a lot of people knew Eva Ducas' story at the time. Perhaps I will find another way to have her remebered. I see an omission in Esther's bio. I'll gather my references![[User:Padres Hana|Padres Hana]] ([[User talk:Padres Hana|talk]]) 22:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

22328 +++$+++ Epeefleche +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22328 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-26 03:32:00 +++$+++ 1.196076720E09 +++$+++ Nice job updating [[Jesse Levine]].  Might you be able to add a box?  Above my skill level.  Tx.  -- +++$+++ Nice job updating [[Jesse Levine]].  Might you be able to add a box?  Above my skill level.  Tx.  --[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 03:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
22329 +++$+++ Tiddly Tom +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22328 +++$+++ 22328 +++$+++ 2007-11-26 07:20:00 +++$+++ 1.196090400E09 +++$+++ Hey GAThrawnIGF! Most messages sent through wikipedia are done by editing a [[WP:TP|user talk pages]] like this! This is considered a ''message''! Also, you can email uses who have allowed the function by going onto their user page and clicking 'E-mail this user'. While I'm here, don't forget to sign posts with <nowiki>~~~~<\/nowiki> so users know who, and when they are speaking to somebody. If you have anymore questions, don't hesitate in contacting me :) <span style=\"border:2px solid #483C32;\"> +++$+++ : Hey GAThrawnIGF! Most messages sent through wikipedia are done by editing a [[WP:TP|user talk pages]] like this! This is considered a ''message''! Also, you can email uses who have allowed the function by going onto their user page and clicking 'E-mail this user'. While I'm here, don't forget to sign posts with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> so users know who, and when they are speaking to somebody. If you have anymore questions, don't hesitate in contacting me :) <span style="border:2px solid #483C32;">[[User:Tiddly Tom|<font style="color:#7FFF00;background:#483C32;">'''Tiddly</font><font style="color:#483C32;background:#483C32;">-</font><font style="color:#DFFF00;background:#483C32;">Tom'''</font>]]</span> 07:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

568131 +++$+++  +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568131 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-01-06 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.136578620E09 +++$+++ Hi.  I see you use an image from ''Star Trek'' in your signature.  However, this image does not comply with the fair use criteria when used in a signature, or any way unrelated to the image itself.  Could you please remove this image from your signature.  Cheers!  +++$+++ Hi.  I see you use an image from ''Star Trek'' in your signature.  However, this image does not comply with the fair use criteria when used in a signature, or any way unrelated to the image itself.  Could you please remove this image from your signature.  Cheers! [[User:Sam Korn|<nowiki>[[Sam Korn]]</nowiki>]] 12:17, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
568132 +++$+++  +++$+++ (aeropagitica) +++$+++ 568131 +++$+++ 568131 +++$+++ 2006-01-06 16:25:00 +++$+++ 1.136593500E09 +++$+++ Cool, thanks.  Sorry if I sounded terse above -- it wasn't the first such comment I've made recently.  +++$+++ :Cool, thanks.  Sorry if I sounded terse above -- it wasn't the first such comment I've made recently. [[User:Sam Korn|<nowiki>[[Sam Korn]]</nowiki>]] 16:25, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

284475 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284475 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-31 11:51:00 +++$+++ 1.175367060E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry to say that it is likely to have been the ''T\/t'' debate, and the consequences thereof. I'm not sure as I bowed out of the Beatles Project a couple of weeks back and only caught up as I watch Crestville's talkpage. Looking over A's and [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|V, C & D]]'s talkpages and the Beatles Policy talkpage renders a few clues. I'm not sure what precisely happened, but I think the consequences are bad for the Project and Wikipedia. The Project lost more than these two, as a few more other editors pulled out too. It's a shame. I'm still editing Beatles articles, but as an independent. Thank the deity of your choice for Crestville...  +++$+++ I'm sorry to say that it is likely to have been the ''T/t'' debate, and the consequences thereof. I'm not sure as I bowed out of the Beatles Project a couple of weeks back and only caught up as I watch Crestville's talkpage. Looking over A's and [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|V, C & D]]'s talkpages and the Beatles Policy talkpage renders a few clues. I'm not sure what precisely happened, but I think the consequences are bad for the Project and Wikipedia. The Project lost more than these two, as a few more other editors pulled out too. It's a shame. I'm still editing Beatles articles, but as an independent. Thank the deity of your choice for Crestville... [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 11:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
284476 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284475 +++$+++ 284475 +++$+++ 2007-03-31 12:11:00 +++$+++ 1.175368260E09 +++$+++ I wasn't really paying attention because I'm working on other things, but Andrea just deleted all his stuff  one day. I asked him what he was doing but go no reply, and then a vague, anonymous responce later. Shame really.-- +++$+++ :I wasn't really paying attention because I'm working on other things, but Andrea just deleted all his stuff  one day. I asked him what he was doing but go no reply, and then a vague, anonymous responce later. Shame really.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 12:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
284477 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284475 +++$+++ 284476 +++$+++ 2007-04-02 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.175580540E09 +++$+++ Seems to be resolving itself now, which is good. Andrea just needs a little push. Go tell him you love him or something.-- +++$+++ ::Seems to be resolving itself now, which is good. Andrea just needs a little push. Go tell him you love him or something.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 23:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

22332 +++$+++ Flags-Chaser +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22332 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.199345220E09 +++$+++ Please, don't update the results before matches are over. -- +++$+++ Please, don't update the results before matches are over. --[[User:Flags-Chaser|Flags-Chaser]] ([[User talk:Flags-Chaser|talk]]) 23:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
22333 +++$+++ LeaveSleaves +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22332 +++$+++ 22332 +++$+++ 2008-01-18 04:30:00 +++$+++ 1.200659400E09 +++$+++ I'll second that  +++$+++ :I'll second that [[User:LeaveSleaves|LeaveSleaves]] ([[User talk:LeaveSleaves|talk]]) 04:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

614669 +++$+++ WarthogDemon +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614669 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-08 00:14:00 +++$+++ 1.165565640E09 +++$+++ I've found two userpages that are soley spam posting.  Should I mark both as ONE mfd?  They are unquestionably the same: [[User:Sikhcoalitionorg]] and [[User:Sikh]]. - +++$+++ I've found two userpages that are soley spam posting.  Should I mark both as ONE mfd?  They are unquestionably the same: [[User:Sikhcoalitionorg]] and [[User:Sikh]]. -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 00:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
614670 +++$+++ 75.21.175.73 +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614669 +++$+++ 614669 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 03:11:00 +++$+++ 1.165576260E09 +++$+++ I know this isn't the proper venue to discuss changes to the article, but it is, as of this revision, not acceptable under the NPOV policy.  -- +++$+++ :I know this isn't the proper venue to discuss changes to the article, but it is, as of this revision, not acceptable under the NPOV policy.  --[[User:75.21.175.73|75.21.175.73]] 03:11, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
614671 +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614669 +++$+++ 614670 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 03:22:00 +++$+++ 1.165576920E09 +++$+++ I understand how more arguments and more text provides weight to that argument, the question is whether or not that weight is '''undue'''. Instead of taking out opinions for the illegal side, a better idea might be to add arguments for the legal side, and then maybe a daughter article could be used to house all of the third party arguments and the most prominent ones could still be displayed on the main article. -- +++$+++ ::I understand how more arguments and more text provides weight to that argument, the question is whether or not that weight is '''undue'''. Instead of taking out opinions for the illegal side, a better idea might be to add arguments for the legal side, and then maybe a daughter article could be used to house all of the third party arguments and the most prominent ones could still be displayed on the main article. --[[User:Daniel Olsen|Daniel Olsen]] 03:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
614672 +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ Daniel Olsen +++$+++ 614669 +++$+++ 614669 +++$+++ 2006-12-08 03:30:00 +++$+++ 1.165577400E09 +++$+++ I'm sorry, what are you referring to? -- +++$+++ :I'm sorry, what are you referring to? --[[User:Daniel Olsen|Daniel Olsen]] 03:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

284478 +++$+++ Defender 911 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284478 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-03-31 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.175390940E09 +++$+++ I see that we share a point of view on the Kent State Murder. You may want to post a comment on my user page. -- +++$+++ I see that we share a point of view on the Kent State Murder. You may want to post a comment on my user page. --[[User:Defender 911|Defender 911]] 18:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
284479 +++$+++ Defender 911 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284478 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-02 11:11:00 +++$+++ 1.175537460E09 +++$+++ Tvoz, I just want to bring to your attention that there is a vote on my user talk page over the Kent State issue. Please try to participate or inform other users please.      Thank you.  +++$+++ ::Tvoz, I just want to bring to your attention that there is a vote on my user talk page over the Kent State issue. Please try to participate or inform other users please.      Thank you. [[User:Defender 911|Defender 911]] 11:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

284480 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284480 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-01 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.175469240E09 +++$+++ Hi Tvoz. Have you met [[User:MiszaBot\/Archive_requests|MiszaBot]]? [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]],  +++$+++ Hi Tvoz. Have you met [[User:MiszaBot/Archive_requests|MiszaBot]]? [[User:Xiner|Xiner]] ([[User talk:Xiner|talk]], [[User:Xiner/Editor_conflicts#Leaving_Wikipedia|a promise]]) 16:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
284481 +++$+++ Xiner +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284480 +++$+++ 284480 +++$+++ 2007-04-01 16:14:00 +++$+++ 1.175469240E09 +++$+++ Fine, be like that.  +++$+++ :Fine, be like that. [[User:Xiner|XinerBot]] 16:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

22339 +++$+++ Aecis +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22339 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-16 01:33:00 +++$+++ 1.208334780E09 +++$+++ Could you please explain why you [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=2008_Open_de_Tenis_Comunidad_Valenciana_-_Singles&diff=prev&oldid=205844737 changed the nationality] of [[Yuri Schukin]] from Russian to Kazakhstani? [[Special:Contributions\/Aecis|<font color=\"blue\">A<\/font>]] +++$+++ Could you please explain why you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2008_Open_de_Tenis_Comunidad_Valenciana_-_Singles&diff=prev&oldid=205844737 changed the nationality] of [[Yuri Schukin]] from Russian to Kazakhstani? [[Special:Contributions/Aecis|<font color="blue">A</font>]][[User:Aecis|<font color="green">ecis</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Aecis|Brievenbus]]</sup> 01:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
22340 +++$+++ Aecis +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22339 +++$+++ 22339 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 21:51:00 +++$+++ 1.208407860E09 +++$+++ Thank you for the source. I have changed the article [[Yuri Schukin]] accordingly, and I am in the process of changing the flags in tournaments he played. Do you know when he changed nationality? [[Special:Contributions\/Aecis|<font color=\"blue\">A<\/font>]] +++$+++ :Thank you for the source. I have changed the article [[Yuri Schukin]] accordingly, and I am in the process of changing the flags in tournaments he played. Do you know when he changed nationality? [[Special:Contributions/Aecis|<font color="blue">A</font>]][[User:Aecis|<font color="green">ecis</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Aecis|Brievenbus]]</sup> 21:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
22341 +++$+++ Aecis +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22339 +++$+++ 22340 +++$+++ 2008-04-16 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.208413200E09 +++$+++ I just came across [http:\/\/www.cna.com.tw\/cnaeng\/RealTimeNews\/NewsDetail.aspx?strNewsDate=20080411&strNewsID=200804110056&strType=JD this article] from last week by Taiwanese news agency CNA. It says that \"Schukin recently obtained a Kazakhstan passport...\" This would mean that he still played under a Russian licence in 2007 and earlier, which means that he would get a Russian flag in tournaments prior to 2008. [[Special:Contributions\/Aecis|<font color=\"blue\">A<\/font>]] +++$+++ ::I just came across [http://www.cna.com.tw/cnaeng/RealTimeNews/NewsDetail.aspx?strNewsDate=20080411&strNewsID=200804110056&strType=JD this article] from last week by Taiwanese news agency CNA. It says that "Schukin recently obtained a Kazakhstan passport..." This would mean that he still played under a Russian licence in 2007 and earlier, which means that he would get a Russian flag in tournaments prior to 2008. [[Special:Contributions/Aecis|<font color="blue">A</font>]][[User:Aecis|<font color="green">ecis</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Aecis|Brievenbus]]</sup> 23:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

284486 +++$+++ Equinox137 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284486 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-06 08:27:00 +++$+++ 1.175873220E09 +++$+++ Hey, Tvoz - I've been nominated for an adminship by Defender911. Feel free to visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Equinox 137 to give your input. Thanks.   +++$+++ Hey, Tvoz - I've been nominated for an adminship by Defender911. Feel free to visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Equinox 137 to give your input. Thanks.  [[User:Equinox137|Equinox137]] 08:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
284487 +++$+++ Closenplay +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284486 +++$+++ 284486 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.175997180E09 +++$+++ I'm not questioning the validity of the book. A quick check on [http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/reader\/0826469337\/ref=sib_dp_pop_idx\/102-9495913-7698514?ie=UTF8&p=S0KW#reader-link Amazon] (where you can read the index) shows that Kurtis Blow is not mentioned on the pages cited. I think that ''faking'' your sources is a far greater sin than simply adding unverified material\u2014it indicates ''intent'' to deceive rather than simply being misinformed. If you check every other edit by that same [[Special:Contributions\/24.30.54.146|user]], it's ''all'' unverified information inserting this Wayne Garfield into the lives of notable musicians. I could see leaving in the fact that Dylan appears on the album, but I feel strongly that the Byrd\/Garfield references should be struck (stricken?). I have no interest in starting a revert war of any kind so, if you would be so kind, could you please reword that part of the article? Wikipedia is not the place for self-aggrandizing back-up singers to exaggerate their role in the lives of those more famous than they are.  +++$+++ :I'm not questioning the validity of the book. A quick check on [http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0826469337/ref=sib_dp_pop_idx/102-9495913-7698514?ie=UTF8&p=S0KW#reader-link Amazon] (where you can read the index) shows that Kurtis Blow is not mentioned on the pages cited. I think that ''faking'' your sources is a far greater sin than simply adding unverified material—it indicates ''intent'' to deceive rather than simply being misinformed. If you check every other edit by that same [[Special:Contributions/24.30.54.146|user]], it's ''all'' unverified information inserting this Wayne Garfield into the lives of notable musicians. I could see leaving in the fact that Dylan appears on the album, but I feel strongly that the Byrd/Garfield references should be struck (stricken?). I have no interest in starting a revert war of any kind so, if you would be so kind, could you please reword that part of the article? Wikipedia is not the place for self-aggrandizing back-up singers to exaggerate their role in the lives of those more famous than they are. [[User:Closenplay|Closenplay]] 18:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
284488 +++$+++ Closenplay +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284486 +++$+++ 284486 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.175997720E09 +++$+++ The songwriting credit on the Kurtis Blow track that Garfield claims that he co-wrote is ONLY Kurtis Blow. (Another \"blow\" to the user's (Garfield himself?) credibility.  +++$+++ :The songwriting credit on the Kurtis Blow track that Garfield claims that he co-wrote is ONLY Kurtis Blow. (Another "blow" to the user's (Garfield himself?) credibility. [[User:Closenplay|Closenplay]] 19:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
284489 +++$+++ Closenplay +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284486 +++$+++ 284488 +++$+++ 2007-04-07 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.175998920E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I can live with asking for citations, as long as it's removed promptly if no reliable sources are cited. I did comment out the part of the Kurtis Blow entry claiming a songwriting credit; that song is credited on the album to Blow alone. Cheers!  +++$+++ ::Yeah, I can live with asking for citations, as long as it's removed promptly if no reliable sources are cited. I did comment out the part of the Kurtis Blow entry claiming a songwriting credit; that song is credited on the album to Blow alone. Cheers! [[User:Closenplay|Closenplay]] 19:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

546632 +++$+++ Mike Halterman +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-13 09:30:00 +++$+++ 1.234546200E09 +++$+++ Eftersom du har givet dit navn til [http:\/\/meta.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Wikimedia_Danmark Wikimedia Danmark], er du hermed inviteret til den f\xf8rste generalforsamling. P\xe5 dette m\xf8de vil vi ratificere vores vedt\xe6gter (som findes i kladde p\xe5 dansk og engelsk p\xe5 meta). Startende ved dette m\xf8de og efterf\xf8lgende m\xf8der, vil vi annoncere m\xf8dested og tidspunkt \xe9n m\xe5ned i forvejen. Den f\xf8rste generalforsamling vil blive holdt den 14. marts 2009, kl. 14.00 p\xe5 Dag Hammarskj\xf6lds All\xe9 30, 2100 K\xf8benhavn \xd8, i K\xf8benhavn \xd8st ([http:\/\/www.findvej.dk\/DagHammarskj%F6ldsAll%E930,2100 kort]). Det er 500 meter nordvest fra \xd8sterport station. Kontakt venligst mig, eller [[:da:Bruger:Palnatoke]] og giv besked om du har i sinde at m\xf8de op. Tak for din entusiasme, og st\xf8tte til Wikimedia Danmark.  +++$+++ Eftersom du har givet dit navn til [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Danmark Wikimedia Danmark], er du hermed inviteret til den første generalforsamling. På dette møde vil vi ratificere vores vedtægter (som findes i kladde på dansk og engelsk på meta). Startende ved dette møde og efterfølgende møder, vil vi annoncere mødested og tidspunkt én måned i forvejen. Den første generalforsamling vil blive holdt den 14. marts 2009, kl. 14.00 på Dag Hammarskjölds Allé 30, 2100 København Ø, i København Øst ([http://www.findvej.dk/DagHammarskj%F6ldsAll%E930,2100 kort]). Det er 500 meter nordvest fra Østerport station. Kontakt venligst mig, eller [[:da:Bruger:Palnatoke]] og giv besked om du har i sinde at møde op. Tak for din entusiasme, og støtte til Wikimedia Danmark. [[User:Mike Halterman|Mike H.]] [[User talk:Mike Halterman|Fierce!]] 09:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
546633 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546632 +++$+++ 546632 +++$+++ 2009-03-01 13:05:00 +++$+++ 1.235941500E09 +++$+++ (til palnatoke) Hej Ole, Jeg har en aftale i Drag\xf8r p\xe5 14 Marts kl. 17 allerede. Desv\xe6rre. Men jeg vil gerne at komme til generalforsamlingen -- med forst\xe5elsen at jeg skal tage afsted omkring kl 16. (M\xe5ske har du planlagt at sparke os ud f\xf8r denne tid allegivel.) Jeg gl\xe6der mig til at tale med dig og de andre der. Vi ses. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :(til palnatoke) Hej Ole, Jeg har en aftale i Dragør på 14 Marts kl. 17 allerede. Desværre. Men jeg vil gerne at komme til generalforsamlingen -- med forståelsen at jeg skal tage afsted omkring kl 16. (Måske har du planlagt at sparke os ud før denne tid allegivel.) Jeg glæder mig til at tale med dig og de andre der. Vi ses. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 13:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

546634 +++$+++ Itsmejudith +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546634 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-16 23:09:00 +++$+++ 1.234854540E09 +++$+++ Was that in response to my posting in the articles in need of translation, or had you already spotted it? If the former, then it was amazingly rapid. Thanks.  +++$+++ Was that in response to my posting in the articles in need of translation, or had you already spotted it? If the former, then it was amazingly rapid. Thanks. [[User:Itsmejudith|Itsmejudith]] ([[User talk:Itsmejudith|talk]]) 23:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
546635 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546634 +++$+++ 546634 +++$+++ 2009-02-16 23:12:00 +++$+++ 1.234854720E09 +++$+++ Yes, I was on the translation page when I saw your post and decided to check it out. And, of course, you were right. Great instinct. Cheers. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Yes, I was on the translation page when I saw your post and decided to check it out. And, of course, you were right. Great instinct. Cheers. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 23:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

47415 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47415 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-10-12 18:42:00 +++$+++ 1.223862120E09 +++$+++ Do your hardback copies of [[Basic Chess Endings]] have a dust jacket (mine doesn't).  If so, does it look like the cover of the 1971 paperback pictured in the article?   +++$+++ Do your hardback copies of [[Basic Chess Endings]] have a dust jacket (mine doesn't).  If so, does it look like the cover of the 1971 paperback pictured in the article?  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 18:42, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
47416 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47415 +++$+++ 47415 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.223894220E09 +++$+++ No, they don't. Two hardcover copies, zero dust jackets. From what I've seen (in my library and on [[eBay]]), I don't think ''BCE'' ever had a dust jacket. I've seen pictures of the signed first edition (limited to 500 numbered copies, all signed by Fine) and I don't recall even them having dust jackets.  +++$+++ :No, they don't. Two hardcover copies, zero dust jackets. From what I've seen (in my library and on [[eBay]]), I don't think ''BCE'' ever had a dust jacket. I've seen pictures of the signed first edition (limited to 500 numbered copies, all signed by Fine) and I don't recall even them having dust jackets. [[User:Krakatoa|Krakatoa]] ([[User talk:Krakatoa#top|talk]]) 03:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
47417 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47415 +++$+++ 47416 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.223894640E09 +++$+++ Maybe not then.  I got a new copy of Fine's ''Practical Chess Openings'' in 1967, and I don't think it had a dust jacket.   +++$+++ :: Maybe not then.  I got a new copy of Fine's ''Practical Chess Openings'' in 1967, and I don't think it had a dust jacket.  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 03:44, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
47418 +++$+++ Bubba73 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47415 +++$+++ 47416 +++$+++ 2008-10-13 03:48:00 +++$+++ 1.223894880E09 +++$+++ Looking it up on used book sites, they say \"no dust jacket issued\".   +++$+++ :: Looking it up on used book sites, they say "no dust jacket issued".  [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 03:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

284492 +++$+++ Natalie Erin +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284492 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-08 17:00:00 +++$+++ 1.176076800E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up - I deleted the category and removed it from the articles. It didn't really fall into a speedy deletion criteria, but I think [[WP:SNOW]] or similar applies here. Hopefully everything will make sense to him.  +++$+++ Thanks for the heads up - I deleted the category and removed it from the articles. It didn't really fall into a speedy deletion criteria, but I think [[WP:SNOW]] or similar applies here. Hopefully everything will make sense to him. [[User:Natalie Erin|Natalie]] 17:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
284493 +++$+++ Natalie Erin +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284492 +++$+++ 284492 +++$+++ 2007-04-08 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.176076920E09 +++$+++ No problem. It's a good thing he hadn't actually added all the US Democrats to the cat yet.  +++$+++ :No problem. It's a good thing he hadn't actually added all the US Democrats to the cat yet. [[User:Natalie Erin|Natalie]] 17:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

22350 +++$+++ 03md +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22350 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-02-24 22:02:00 +++$+++ 1.235541720E09 +++$+++ You could start with one of the completed tournaments from last week - which article are you going to do so I can keep an eye on it? Remember to add references from ATP\/WTA and other reliable websites.  +++$+++ You could start with one of the completed tournaments from last week - which article are you going to do so I can keep an eye on it? Remember to add references from ATP/WTA and other reliable websites. [[User:03md|03md]] ([[User talk:03md|talk]]) 22:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
22351 +++$+++ 03md +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22350 +++$+++ 22350 +++$+++ 2009-02-24 22:53:00 +++$+++ 1.235544780E09 +++$+++ It's starting to look good. I have moved the first two sentences of the \"Tournament\" section back to the top so it still has a lede section - hope this is okay. I will not alter anything else until you are finished.  +++$+++ :It's starting to look good. I have moved the first two sentences of the "Tournament" section back to the top so it still has a lede section - hope this is okay. I will not alter anything else until you are finished. [[User:03md|03md]] ([[User talk:03md|talk]]) 22:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

265869 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265869 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-11-30 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.164940800E09 +++$+++ Hi.I understand what you are asking. \"They\" in case would mean the Hoysalas (kings). In places where you are sure something is wrong, go ahead and make the change. In places you want a discussion, we can do just that and see if I have a reasonable explanation, if not You or I can then make the change accordingly. Dont hesitate to ask any number of questions, it can only help. +++$+++ Hi.I understand what you are asking. "They" in case would mean the Hoysalas (kings). In places where you are sure something is wrong, go ahead and make the change. In places you want a discussion, we can do just that and see if I have a reasonable explanation, if not You or I can then make the change accordingly. Dont hesitate to ask any number of questions, it can only help.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
265870 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265869 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 18:46:00 +++$+++ 1.164941160E09 +++$+++ Thats right. +++$+++ :: Thats right.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 18:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
265871 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265869 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 19:12:00 +++$+++ 1.164942720E09 +++$+++ User BostonMA is also helping us. So lets work together in Sync.thanks. +++$+++ ::User BostonMA is also helping us. So lets work together in Sync.thanks.[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
265872 +++$+++ Dineshkannambadi +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265869 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2006-11-30 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.164944460E09 +++$+++ Can you put what you think is suitable together and paste it in my user page? +++$+++ :: Can you put what you think is suitable together and paste it in my user page?[[User:Dineshkannambadi|Dineshkannambadi]] 19:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

284496 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284496 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-12 09:57:00 +++$+++ 1.176397020E09 +++$+++ Regarding [[Talk:Don Imus]]: just go ahead and remove all talk page chatter on sight, treat it as vandalism, warn the editors with the {{tl|uw-chat}} series of warning templates, and report repeat offenders at [[WP:AIV]]. And thanks for what you've been doing so far. The above comment suggests you may already be warning them, that's good. Go ahead and remove their comments as well. <span style=\"white-space: nowrap\">\u2014  +++$+++ Regarding [[Talk:Don Imus]]: just go ahead and remove all talk page chatter on sight, treat it as vandalism, warn the editors with the {{tl|uw-chat}} series of warning templates, and report repeat offenders at [[WP:AIV]]. And thanks for what you've been doing so far. The above comment suggests you may already be warning them, that's good. Go ahead and remove their comments as well. <span style="white-space: nowrap">— [[User:Coelacan |coe<span style="font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>]][[ User talk:Coelacan |acan]]</span> — 09:57, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
284497 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284496 +++$+++ 284496 +++$+++ 2007-04-13 05:22:00 +++$+++ 1.176466920E09 +++$+++ Oh, I don't even want to touch [[Talk:Kurt Vonnegut]]. I just scanned over it and saw people arguing over whether to include the words \"so it goes\". Is it really as silly as the first impression I got? <span style=\"white-space: nowrap\">\u2014  +++$+++ :Oh, I don't even want to touch [[Talk:Kurt Vonnegut]]. I just scanned over it and saw people arguing over whether to include the words "so it goes". Is it really as silly as the first impression I got? <span style="white-space: nowrap">— [[User:Coelacan |coe<span style="font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>]][[ User talk:Coelacan |acan]]</span> — 05:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

22353 +++$+++ Bwilkins +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22353 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-19 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.250743320E09 +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for your contributions to [[Wikipedia:About|Wikipedia]]. Please don't forget to provide an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]{{#if:|, as you forgot on your recent edit to [[{{{1}}}]]|&#32;for your edits}}. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style=\"font-variant:small-caps\">talk\u2192<\/font>]]<span style=\"border:1px solid black;\">'''&nbsp; +++$+++ [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for your contributions to [[Wikipedia:About|Wikipedia]]. Please don't forget to provide an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]{{#if:|, as you forgot on your recent edit to [[{{{1}}}]]|&#32;for your edits}}. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">'''&nbsp;[[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]]&nbsp;'''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</font>]]) 21:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
22354 +++$+++ Commander Keane +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22353 +++$+++ 22353 +++$+++ 2009-09-04 04:55:00 +++$+++ 1.252065300E09 +++$+++ popped up on my [[Help:Watching pages|watchlist]] I wondering how anyone could add so much to an older article, but it turned out to be very useful draw information! Keep up the good work and leave an edit summary if you can.-- +++$+++ :popped up on my [[Help:Watching pages|watchlist]] I wondering how anyone could add so much to an older article, but it turned out to be very useful draw information! Keep up the good work and leave an edit summary if you can.--[[User:Commander Keane|Commander Keane]] ([[User talk:Commander Keane|talk]]) 04:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

22355 +++$+++ TW-RF +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22355 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-08 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.252401780E09 +++$+++ Hello, I am going to give you this link to do the matches if you want to, which here is the [http:\/\/www.australianopen.com\/en_AU\/scores\/schedule\/schedule6.html link]. If you want to or not, I just don't have the time! I'll say we probably have to do the three courts Laver, Hisense, Court! +++$+++ Hello, I am going to give you this link to do the matches if you want to, which here is the [http://www.australianopen.com/en_AU/scores/schedule/schedule6.html link]. If you want to or not, I just don't have the time! I'll say we probably have to do the three courts Laver, Hisense, Court![[User:TW-RF|TW-RF]] ([[User talk:TW-RF|talk]]) 02:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
22356 +++$+++ TW-RF +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22355 +++$+++ 22355 +++$+++ 2009-09-08 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.252471440E09 +++$+++ I am loving your work so-far! GOOD JOB! +++$+++ :I am loving your work so-far! GOOD JOB![[User:TW-RF|TW-RF]] ([[User talk:TW-RF|talk]]) 21:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
22357 +++$+++ TW-RF +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22355 +++$+++ 22356 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.252541580E09 +++$+++ Good Job on those six you did, I did the last three! I will work on a couple of them over the next couple of weeks if you don't want to do them. I got all the kinks fixed with the schedule of play links on the page just copy and paste it into yours! +++$+++ ::Good Job on those six you did, I did the last three! I will work on a couple of them over the next couple of weeks if you don't want to do them. I got all the kinks fixed with the schedule of play links on the page just copy and paste it into yours![[User:TW-RF|TW-RF]] ([[User talk:TW-RF|talk]]) 17:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
22358 +++$+++ 98.240.44.215 +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22355 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 22:11:00 +++$+++ 1.252559460E09 +++$+++ I will do day 10![[Special:Contributions\/98.240.44.215|98.240.44.215]] ( +++$+++ ::::I will do day 10![[Special:Contributions/98.240.44.215|98.240.44.215]] ([[User talk:98.240.44.215|talk]]) 22:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
22359 +++$+++ 98.240.44.215 +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22355 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 22:58:00 +++$+++ 1.252562280E09 +++$+++ I will do day Nine(9), but I need you or someone to do day Eight(8)! PLEASE![[Special:Contributions\/98.240.44.215|98.240.44.215]] ( +++$+++ :::::I will do day Nine(9), but I need you or someone to do day Eight(8)! PLEASE![[Special:Contributions/98.240.44.215|98.240.44.215]] ([[User talk:98.240.44.215|talk]]) 22:58, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
22360 +++$+++ 98.240.44.215 +++$+++ GAThrawnIGF +++$+++ 22355 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 23:46:00 +++$+++ 1.252565160E09 +++$+++ Nevermind, I will do it to get it done![[Special:Contributions\/98.240.44.215|98.240.44.215]] ( +++$+++ ::::::Nevermind, I will do it to get it done![[Special:Contributions/98.240.44.215|98.240.44.215]] ([[User talk:98.240.44.215|talk]]) 23:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

284501 +++$+++ Koncorde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284501 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-13 21:55:00 +++$+++ 1.176526500E09 +++$+++ You have my apologies.  I didn't check which cite you referred to I must admit, so I apologise again for the mistake.  The Capslock thing I couldn't resist however :D-- +++$+++ You have my apologies.  I didn't check which cite you referred to I must admit, so I apologise again for the mistake.  The Capslock thing I couldn't resist however :D--[[User:Koncorde|Koncorde]] 21:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
284502 +++$+++ Koncorde +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284501 +++$+++ 284501 +++$+++ 2007-04-14 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.176534000E09 +++$+++ I've got used to so many silly revisions of sensible amendments (I was \"there\" when Mel Gibson gobbed off; the silly moo) and the bile with which people seem determined to fill up otherwise sensible biographies that I reacted without my usual attention to detail.  When a 40 year career is summed up by someone placing tomorrows chip paper next to yester-years Grammy award and plaudits you get to thinking 'perception' is a dirty word on Wikipedia.  As for Kurt - utter, unabridged, legend.-- +++$+++ :I've got used to so many silly revisions of sensible amendments (I was "there" when Mel Gibson gobbed off; the silly moo) and the bile with which people seem determined to fill up otherwise sensible biographies that I reacted without my usual attention to detail.  When a 40 year career is summed up by someone placing tomorrows chip paper next to yester-years Grammy award and plaudits you get to thinking 'perception' is a dirty word on Wikipedia.  As for Kurt - utter, unabridged, legend.--[[User:Koncorde|Koncorde]] 00:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

546647 +++$+++ Keegan +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-28 06:46:00 +++$+++ 1.238247960E09 +++$+++ The idea comes down to what you can\/will do with the tools.  I'm not a believer in no need for the admin package; I support users that are trustworthy and through my research you are.  Contact me if you are or are not interested, I'd like to nominate you.   +++$+++ The idea comes down to what you can/will do with the tools.  I'm not a believer in no need for the admin package; I support users that are trustworthy and through my research you are.  Contact me if you are or are not interested, I'd like to nominate you.  [[User:Keegan|<font color="maroon">Keegan</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Keegan|<font color="gray">talk</font>]]</small></sup> 06:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
546648 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546647 +++$+++ 546647 +++$+++ 2009-03-28 10:51:00 +++$+++ 1.238262660E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the consideration, Keegan. I appreciate your interest. I was approached about adminship about six months back. At that time, I decided that I hadn't yet explored enough of the policy and behind-the-scenes areas to be completely comfortable. And was busy with some \"real life\" writing projects, as well. So I deferred making any decision until springtime. Looking out the window now, I see the sun is shining, the trees are budding, and -- even though it snowed only two days ago -- it appears that Spring has finally arrived. (Sometimes hard to tell in Denmark). During the past six months, in between editing, I've checked out most of the admin hotspots, determined policies, filed reports, given opinions, etc. etc. -- you know the drill --  and I have no doubts I can do the tasks. Other than the technical nuts and bolts, it all comes down to following guidelines, creating discussion and determining consensus. Pretty much common sense stuff, really. However... during those months, I also observed the huge quantity of drama, games and overall crap that is played out back stage. A lot of it I would describe as petty bickering. And far too much of that is distracting, unnecessary and only peripherally related to the overall project. Any hesitation I have about adminship is due to my reluctance to be drawn into soap operas. Like everybody, I like the time I donate to WP to be productive - and any backroom gamesmanship certainly isn't, in my opinion. So I am still mulling this thing over. Let me ask you: How do you feel about the drama? Is my perception wrong? If not, do you find the drama necessary? Or, in your experience, how easily does one avoid it?  <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Thanks for the consideration, Keegan. I appreciate your interest. I was approached about adminship about six months back. At that time, I decided that I hadn't yet explored enough of the policy and behind-the-scenes areas to be completely comfortable. And was busy with some "real life" writing projects, as well. So I deferred making any decision until springtime. Looking out the window now, I see the sun is shining, the trees are budding, and -- even though it snowed only two days ago -- it appears that Spring has finally arrived. (Sometimes hard to tell in Denmark). During the past six months, in between editing, I've checked out most of the admin hotspots, determined policies, filed reports, given opinions, etc. etc. -- you know the drill --  and I have no doubts I can do the tasks. Other than the technical nuts and bolts, it all comes down to following guidelines, creating discussion and determining consensus. Pretty much common sense stuff, really. However... during those months, I also observed the huge quantity of drama, games and overall crap that is played out back stage. A lot of it I would describe as petty bickering. And far too much of that is distracting, unnecessary and only peripherally related to the overall project. Any hesitation I have about adminship is due to my reluctance to be drawn into soap operas. Like everybody, I like the time I donate to WP to be productive - and any backroom gamesmanship certainly isn't, in my opinion. So I am still mulling this thing over. Let me ask you: How do you feel about the drama? Is my perception wrong? If not, do you find the drama necessary? Or, in your experience, how easily does one avoid it?  <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 10:51, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
546649 +++$+++ Keegan +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546647 +++$+++ 546648 +++$+++ 2009-03-29 07:33:00 +++$+++ 1.238337180E09 +++$+++ I have been extraordinarily busy in the past year and that won't change in the foreseeable future, but the time I have to contribute is doing admin actions here and there.  I've never been a writer, I don't have time to do vandal patrol like I used to since you need to stay online to follow patterns.  But I still find the tools useful now and again and I'm glad that I have them.  There are many aspects of the maintenance of the project that the tools are useful.  If you would like, I can bang out a nomination for you.  There is no hurry, take as much time as you'd like.   +++$+++ ::I have been extraordinarily busy in the past year and that won't change in the foreseeable future, but the time I have to contribute is doing admin actions here and there.  I've never been a writer, I don't have time to do vandal patrol like I used to since you need to stay online to follow patterns.  But I still find the tools useful now and again and I'm glad that I have them.  There are many aspects of the maintenance of the project that the tools are useful.  If you would like, I can bang out a nomination for you.  There is no hurry, take as much time as you'd like.  [[User:Keegan|<font color="maroon">Keegan</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Keegan|<font color="gray">talk</font>]]</small></sup> 07:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
546650 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546647 +++$+++ 546649 +++$+++ 2009-03-30 11:54:00 +++$+++ 1.238439240E09 +++$+++ That's a nice response. I knew that after 3+ years you must experienced the variety of WP (good and bad). I'm glad to hear that drama isn't compulsory. And I'm also glad to hear that you didn't feel compelled to involve yourself in every (or any particular) area of administration; were able to maintain some independence; and have kept that necessary modicum of perspective that comes from distance. That is important to me, as well. Reading a few pages of longtime users, it appears loss of independence is the single biggest reason they give for avoiding adminship -- the lack of time for writing while having to stamp out endless small fires. As you correctly implied, I tend to wander around on WP. I write, edit, work on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films]], maintain the [[Wikipedia:Requested articles\/Biographies]] page -- and then follow a myriad links to discussions and userpages -- which can lead to PRODs, Afds, SSI, AIV, etc. -- and then back to writing again.  In other words, I'm not focused on an particlar area. I'm not a gunslinger on vandal patrol. I tend to work at pace - and take action as requested or needed whereever I find myself that day. That's enjoyable and I would expect to continue that way even with the tools. I'd undoubtedly just linger longer at CSD or Afd or such to lend another hand. If, as you say, the admin package is more about trust rather than need, I would foresee no problem with accepting a nom. I'll think more about it and get back to you next week. Cheers <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::That's a nice response. I knew that after 3+ years you must experienced the variety of WP (good and bad). I'm glad to hear that drama isn't compulsory. And I'm also glad to hear that you didn't feel compelled to involve yourself in every (or any particular) area of administration; were able to maintain some independence; and have kept that necessary modicum of perspective that comes from distance. That is important to me, as well. Reading a few pages of longtime users, it appears loss of independence is the single biggest reason they give for avoiding adminship -- the lack of time for writing while having to stamp out endless small fires. As you correctly implied, I tend to wander around on WP. I write, edit, work on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films]], maintain the [[Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biographies]] page -- and then follow a myriad links to discussions and userpages -- which can lead to PRODs, Afds, SSI, AIV, etc. -- and then back to writing again.  In other words, I'm not focused on an particlar area. I'm not a gunslinger on vandal patrol. I tend to work at pace - and take action as requested or needed whereever I find myself that day. That's enjoyable and I would expect to continue that way even with the tools. I'd undoubtedly just linger longer at CSD or Afd or such to lend another hand. If, as you say, the admin package is more about trust rather than need, I would foresee no problem with accepting a nom. I'll think more about it and get back to you next week. Cheers <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 11:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
546651 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546647 +++$+++ 546650 +++$+++ 2009-04-21 13:26:00 +++$+++ 1.240345560E09 +++$+++ Just wanted to let you know that I hadn't forgotten about this. I thought I would take you up on your offer when I had a week's time available. Unfortunately, I haven't really found a good stretch of free time yet. And possibly won't until summer. Simply too much on the home front. If a window of opportunity pops open, than I'll give you a shout -- and if you're available at that time, than great. And if not, than no worries. Just wanted to keep in touch. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::::Just wanted to let you know that I hadn't forgotten about this. I thought I would take you up on your offer when I had a week's time available. Unfortunately, I haven't really found a good stretch of free time yet. And possibly won't until summer. Simply too much on the home front. If a window of opportunity pops open, than I'll give you a shout -- and if you're available at that time, than great. And if not, than no worries. Just wanted to keep in touch. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 13:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

396943 +++$+++ Hassocks5489 +++$+++ Edward +++$+++ 396943 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-26 19:41:00 +++$+++ 1.227757260E09 +++$+++ I've watchlisted the page for future reference.  I'll upload these as soon as I can; possibly tonight.  <font face=\"Helvetica\"> +++$+++ I've watchlisted the page for future reference.  I'll upload these as soon as I can; possibly tonight.  <font face="Helvetica">[[User:Hassocks5489|<font color="#00BFFF"><b>Hassocks</b></font>]][[User talk:Hassocks5489|<font color="#228B22">5489<small> (tickets please!)</small></font>]]</font> 19:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
396944 +++$+++ Hassocks5489 +++$+++ Edward +++$+++ 396943 +++$+++ 396943 +++$+++ 2008-12-02 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.228289160E09 +++$+++ Have done all of these now.  <font face=\"Helvetica\"> +++$+++ :Have done all of these now.  <font face="Helvetica">[[User:Hassocks5489|<font color="#00BFFF"><b>Hassocks</b></font>]][[User talk:Hassocks5489|<font color="#228B22">5489<small> (tickets please!)</small></font>]]</font> 23:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

284510 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284510 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.176726240E09 +++$+++ You may want to weigh in at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\/Log\/2007 April 15#List of songs containing covert references to real musicians]], since you were involved in a previous discussion of this article. -  +++$+++ You may want to weigh in at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 April 15#List of songs containing covert references to real musicians]], since you were involved in a previous discussion of this article. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 05:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
284511 +++$+++ Jmabel +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284510 +++$+++ 284510 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.176851400E09 +++$+++ The wording on the nomination was clear. I just never saw it. More of a response on my user talk page. -  +++$+++ : The wording on the nomination was clear. I just never saw it. More of a response on my user talk page. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 16:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

284512 +++$+++ JGHowes +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284512 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-16 12:50:00 +++$+++ 1.176753000E09 +++$+++ Hi, I've done some more work to better elaborate on the outrage sparked by Imus's slur, by adding more cited sources. Please look it over to see if you agree the POV tag could come off <i><b> +++$+++ Hi, I've done some more work to better elaborate on the outrage sparked by Imus's slur, by adding more cited sources. Please look it over to see if you agree the POV tag could come off <i><b>[[User:JGHowes|<font color = "green">JGHowes</font>]]<font color = "darkblue"> <sup>[[User talk:JGHowes|''talk'']]</sup></font></b> - </i> 12:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
284513 +++$+++ JGHowes +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284512 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 13:59:00 +++$+++ 1.177016340E09 +++$+++ Tvoz, have you had a chance to review this article since it was edited for NPOV after your POV tag? I think the POV tag should now be removed. If you don't agree, please advise your reasoning. Thanks <i><b> +++$+++ ::Tvoz, have you had a chance to review this article since it was edited for NPOV after your POV tag? I think the POV tag should now be removed. If you don't agree, please advise your reasoning. Thanks <i><b>[[User:JGHowes|<font color = "green">JGHowes</font>]]<font color = "darkblue"> <sup>[[User talk:JGHowes|''talk'']]</sup></font></b> - </i> 13:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
284514 +++$+++ Wasted Sapience +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284512 +++$+++ 284512 +++$+++ 2007-04-17 00:42:00 +++$+++ 1.176795720E09 +++$+++ But you see mornings are lousy anyway when you have to wake up. Nothing beats sunlight at 8pm, and nothing stinks more than total darkness at 5pm. See me on Kent State. I discuss \"in popular culture\" trivia, however I should have included that the IPC on Kent State is better referenced that most other IPC on Wikipedia. -- +++$+++ :But you see mornings are lousy anyway when you have to wake up. Nothing beats sunlight at 8pm, and nothing stinks more than total darkness at 5pm. See me on Kent State. I discuss "in popular culture" trivia, however I should have included that the IPC on Kent State is better referenced that most other IPC on Wikipedia. --[[User:Wasted Sapience|Wasted Sapience]] 00:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

546657 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546657 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-07 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.239165900E09 +++$+++ You made some very cogent points at the AfD. Please review the now sandblasted article and advise wheteher I have met your concerns. It is much smaller now that I have removed fluff and addressed advert and pov. But I think it is much improved. Best, ''' +++$+++ You made some very cogent points at the AfD. Please review the now sandblasted article and advise wheteher I have met your concerns. It is much smaller now that I have removed fluff and addressed advert and pov. But I think it is much improved. Best, '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 21:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
546658 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546657 +++$+++ 546657 +++$+++ 2009-04-07 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.239167820E09 +++$+++ And just to let you know... I had a close look at the original returened article [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=TOMS_Shoes&diff=258430434&oldid=258430184 diff]. You did more work than I did and led the way. I just tweaked. Good job. ''' +++$+++ :And just to let you know... I had a close look at the original returened article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TOMS_Shoes&diff=258430434&oldid=258430184 diff]. You did more work than I did and led the way. I just tweaked. Good job. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 22:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

546660 +++$+++ Danorton +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546660 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-08 14:20:00 +++$+++ 1.239225600E09 +++$+++ Re your recent change to [[TOMS Shoes]], in a citation you changed the \"work\" from \"TIME.com\" to \"TIME\". The former is the name of the [[Time Inc.|Time Inc.'s]] news publication on the web and the latter is the name of Time, Inc.'s print publication. They are distinctly different works, and this is a particularly important distinction in a citation. Just as with print material, the name of a work on the web is generally taken from the work's title. In this instance, that full title (including the article title) reads \"Heroes and Healers - Sponsored by Hilton Hotels - A Shoe That Fits So Many Souls - TIME.com\". (Web page titles are easily extracted from the page's HTML '''&lt;TITLE&gt;''' tag.) Of course, if the intent is to cite the print article, \"TIME\" would be correct, but the page number would also need to be cited. &mdash; +++$+++ Re your recent change to [[TOMS Shoes]], in a citation you changed the "work" from "TIME.com" to "TIME". The former is the name of the [[Time Inc.|Time Inc.'s]] news publication on the web and the latter is the name of Time, Inc.'s print publication. They are distinctly different works, and this is a particularly important distinction in a citation. Just as with print material, the name of a work on the web is generally taken from the work's title. In this instance, that full title (including the article title) reads "Heroes and Healers - Sponsored by Hilton Hotels - A Shoe That Fits So Many Souls - TIME.com". (Web page titles are easily extracted from the page's HTML '''&lt;TITLE&gt;''' tag.) Of course, if the intent is to cite the print article, "TIME" would be correct, but the page number would also need to be cited. &mdash;[[User:Danorton|Danorton]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Danorton|talk]]) 14:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
546661 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546660 +++$+++ 546660 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.239227460E09 +++$+++ Exactly. They are different and that is why I changed it -- to show that the story appeared in the print version the magazine. As you can see, I also had included a page number.  I believe the Hilton sponsorship deal is [http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/2007\/heroes_healers\/ a special issue] for (according to the Time website) \"a collection of Time's recent coverage of individuals...\". Although I can't be sure, I don't believe it was paid advertising. Perhaps if you were ever stopping by the library for some reason, you could take a look the actual copy. (Being in Denmark, I'm afraid I don't have as much opportunity) <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Exactly. They are different and that is why I changed it -- to show that the story appeared in the print version the magazine. As you can see, I also had included a page number.  I believe the Hilton sponsorship deal is [http://www.time.com/time/2007/heroes_healers/ a special issue] for (according to the Time website) "a collection of Time's recent coverage of individuals...". Although I can't be sure, I don't believe it was paid advertising. Perhaps if you were ever stopping by the library for some reason, you could take a look the actual copy. (Being in Denmark, I'm afraid I don't have as much opportunity) <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:51, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
546662 +++$+++ Danorton +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546660 +++$+++ 546661 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.239229440E09 +++$+++ Oh, I see. I'm sorry, but the edit summary read \"repair,\" and it was actually a change to reference a different publication and I hadn't noticed the page number. How did you manage to find the page number? &mdash; +++$+++ ::Oh, I see. I'm sorry, but the edit summary read "repair," and it was actually a change to reference a different publication and I hadn't noticed the page number. How did you manage to find the page number? &mdash;[[User:Danorton|Danorton]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Danorton|talk]]) 15:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
546663 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546660 +++$+++ 546662 +++$+++ 2009-04-08 18:52:00 +++$+++ 1.239241920E09 +++$+++ I'm a little bit confused by the dates for this story that Time has posted on their website. Perhaps you can figure this out. I found the page number C2 from [http:\/\/www.tomsshoes.com\/images\/uploads\/2007-feb-5-Time.jpg this scan]. Yeah, I know, I know, it's from the TOMS website, but the text matched the [http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/magazine\/article\/0,9171,1582305,00.html TIME website article here] and I found the article in the table of contents for [http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/magazine\/0,9263,7601070205,00.html this printed issue]. Now the online version [http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/magazine\/article\/0,9171,1582305-1,00.html shows a date of January 26 2007] but the printed version came [http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/magazine\/0,9263,7601070205,00.html out on February 5 2007]. (I find it bizarre that Time posts an article online before the hard copy is on the newsstands, but that is apparently the case.) Anyway, I think we should change the date to February 5 2007 and include the printed issue number which is Vol. 169, No 4, and leave off the page number until the actual a hard copy is checked. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::I'm a little bit confused by the dates for this story that Time has posted on their website. Perhaps you can figure this out. I found the page number C2 from [http://www.tomsshoes.com/images/uploads/2007-feb-5-Time.jpg this scan]. Yeah, I know, I know, it's from the TOMS website, but the text matched the [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1582305,00.html TIME website article here] and I found the article in the table of contents for [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601070205,00.html this printed issue]. Now the online version [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1582305-1,00.html shows a date of January 26 2007] but the printed version came [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601070205,00.html out on February 5 2007]. (I find it bizarre that Time posts an article online before the hard copy is on the newsstands, but that is apparently the case.) Anyway, I think we should change the date to February 5 2007 and include the printed issue number which is Vol. 169, No 4, and leave off the page number until the actual a hard copy is checked. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 18:52, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
546664 +++$+++ Danorton +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546660 +++$+++ 546663 +++$+++ 2009-04-09 04:43:00 +++$+++ 1.239277380E09 +++$+++ It's common here for online articles to appear before the print issues are generally available. (e.g. [http:\/\/www.austinchronicle.com\/gyrobase\/Issue\/story?oid=oid%3A764582 This online article] was available April 9, but is dated April 10, when it goes on the stands.) And some periodicals use the \"expiration\" date rather than the date it goes on the stands. For TIME, they list the newsstand date, a Monday. So the online publication date was probably January 26 (a Friday) and the article didn't appear in print until the February 5 issue. This gap isn't so strange for an article that isn't time-sensitive. Absent a print copy or a neutral reference, the only valid choice is to reference a neutral web version and its date. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::It's common here for online articles to appear before the print issues are generally available. (e.g. [http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A764582 This online article] was available April 9, but is dated April 10, when it goes on the stands.) And some periodicals use the "expiration" date rather than the date it goes on the stands. For TIME, they list the newsstand date, a Monday. So the online publication date was probably January 26 (a Friday) and the article didn't appear in print until the February 5 issue. This gap isn't so strange for an article that isn't time-sensitive. Absent a print copy or a neutral reference, the only valid choice is to reference a neutral web version and its date. &mdash;[[User:Danorton|Danorton]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Danorton|talk]]) 04:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
546665 +++$+++ Danorton +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546660 +++$+++ 546664 +++$+++ 2009-04-09 04:49:00 +++$+++ 1.239277740E09 +++$+++ On second thought, maybe the newsstand date was January 26 and the expiration date was February 5. Either way, if we don't have a neutral reference, the best bet is to reference a web version. &mdash; +++$+++ :::::On second thought, maybe the newsstand date was January 26 and the expiration date was February 5. Either way, if we don't have a neutral reference, the best bet is to reference a web version. &mdash;[[User:Danorton|Danorton]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Danorton|talk]]) 04:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
546666 +++$+++ Danorton +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546660 +++$+++ 546663 +++$+++ 2009-04-09 05:03:00 +++$+++ 1.239278580E09 +++$+++ I suspect that the \"C2\" page number was probably from a [http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/reprints\/samples\/ custom reprint], possibly a collection from the Hilton sponsorship. &mdash; +++$+++ ::::I suspect that the "C2" page number was probably from a [http://www.time.com/time/reprints/samples/ custom reprint], possibly a collection from the Hilton sponsorship. &mdash;[[User:Danorton|Danorton]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Danorton|talk]]) 05:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
546667 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546660 +++$+++ 546666 +++$+++ 2009-04-09 10:08:00 +++$+++ 1.239296880E09 +++$+++ Ah, yes. That's sounds correct. The C2 did bother me because it wasn't typical page numbering. That the scan is from the reprint collection makes sense. Whichever way you want to reference it is fine - it's not critical. My personal preference is always to reference the hard copy info. Web links are so nebulous, constantly disappearing, but with an issue number and pub date a reader will be able to locate the source. Thanks for the explanations. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::::Ah, yes. That's sounds correct. The C2 did bother me because it wasn't typical page numbering. That the scan is from the reprint collection makes sense. Whichever way you want to reference it is fine - it's not critical. My personal preference is always to reference the hard copy info. Web links are so nebulous, constantly disappearing, but with an issue number and pub date a reader will be able to locate the source. Thanks for the explanations. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 10:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

284521 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284521 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-19 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.176969300E09 +++$+++ Thank you. I have always admitted freely that, while I may well have reasonable skills in some fields, at basic IT I am an idiot. I had obviously noticed that the type face in the latter part of my talk-page had shrunk, but could not see why and had as yet not got around to calling for help. May I ask what had actually happened, and how you corrected it  - for which I thank you?-- +++$+++ Thank you. I have always admitted freely that, while I may well have reasonable skills in some fields, at basic IT I am an idiot. I had obviously noticed that the type face in the latter part of my talk-page had shrunk, but could not see why and had as yet not got around to calling for help. May I ask what had actually happened, and how you corrected it  - for which I thank you?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 00:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
284522 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284521 +++$+++ 284521 +++$+++ 2007-04-19 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.177001520E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I had in fact read through the page line-by-line, but missed that apparently vital omission.-- +++$+++ :Thanks. I had in fact read through the page line-by-line, but missed that apparently vital omission.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 09:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

22380 +++$+++ Cutler +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22380 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-19 09:12:00 +++$+++ 1.192810320E09 +++$+++ Good work on this David. We need to get this into use. I have added some comments on the template talk page but will not attempt to edit is as aesthetics are not my strong point. +++$+++ Good work on this David. We need to get this into use. I have added some comments on the template talk page but will not attempt to edit is as aesthetics are not my strong point.[[User:Cutler|Cutler]] 09:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
22381 +++$+++ Swid +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22380 +++$+++ 22380 +++$+++ 2008-03-11 05:30:00 +++$+++ 1.205238600E09 +++$+++ An open question\/suggestion for you and [[User:Cutler|Cutler]]: Shouldn't [[Template:UK legislation]] and [[Template:British legislation lists, Acts]] be merged? \u2013&nbsp; +++$+++ :An open question/suggestion for you and [[User:Cutler|Cutler]]: Shouldn't [[Template:UK legislation]] and [[Template:British legislation lists, Acts]] be merged? –&nbsp;[[User:Swid|Swid]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Swid|talk]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Swid|edits]])</sup> 05:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

284526 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284526 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-20 05:26:00 +++$+++ 1.177071960E09 +++$+++ Thanks. \u2014  +++$+++ Thanks. — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] | [[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]] 05:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
284527 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284526 +++$+++ 284526 +++$+++ 2007-04-20 15:12:00 +++$+++ 1.177107120E09 +++$+++ Funny you should mention the Amalgamated. My grandmother was a life-long member of the ILG, and I have a friend who works for UNITE HERE. But I never knew anybody who lived there. :-) \u2014  +++$+++ : Funny you should mention the Amalgamated. My grandmother was a life-long member of the ILG, and I have a friend who works for UNITE HERE. But I never knew anybody who lived there. :-) — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] | [[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]] 15:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

284528 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284528 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-21 15:43:00 +++$+++ 1.177195380E09 +++$+++ I received an email from the photographer and he wanted the image removed. I called Obama's people and they confirmed that he was the owner of the image and that it wasn't owned by either the US government or the Obama campaign.  Reference [[WP:OTRS]] ticket 2007041810014021 for confirmation. Since the gentleman was under Obama's employ at the time I think they could make the case that the image belongs to them or the government. However, if Obama's people are not going to claim ownership then we can't fight that battle. In any case we have free images to use in it's place so it's not worth the risk. --- +++$+++ I received an email from the photographer and he wanted the image removed. I called Obama's people and they confirmed that he was the owner of the image and that it wasn't owned by either the US government or the Obama campaign.  Reference [[WP:OTRS]] ticket 2007041810014021 for confirmation. Since the gentleman was under Obama's employ at the time I think they could make the case that the image belongs to them or the government. However, if Obama's people are not going to claim ownership then we can't fight that battle. In any case we have free images to use in it's place so it's not worth the risk. ---[[User:J.smith|J.S]]  <small>([[User_talk:J.smith|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/J.smith|C]]/[[WP:WRE|WRE]])</small> 15:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
284529 +++$+++  +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284528 +++$+++ 284528 +++$+++ 2007-04-21 22:16:00 +++$+++ 1.177218960E09 +++$+++ Yeah, it's odd that there wasn't any kind of attribution... but thats between the photographer and Obama. --- +++$+++ :Yeah, it's odd that there wasn't any kind of attribution... but thats between the photographer and Obama. ---[[User:J.smith|J.S]]  <small>([[User_talk:J.smith|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/J.smith|C]]/[[WP:WRE|WRE]])</small> 22:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

284531 +++$+++ Scheibenzahl +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284531 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-21 21:58:00 +++$+++ 1.177217880E09 +++$+++ Please look at the [[Jail|article now]]. Regarding page history etc., I will request an administrator to do the job cleanly (by deleting\/moving instead of copy\/pasting). I am sorry for creating the mess, since I am not an administrator, I should have asked some one to do the job. Right now I have posted the talk page at [[Talk:Jail]].-- +++$+++ Please look at the [[Jail|article now]]. Regarding page history etc., I will request an administrator to do the job cleanly (by deleting/moving instead of copy/pasting). I am sorry for creating the mess, since I am not an administrator, I should have asked some one to do the job. Right now I have posted the talk page at [[Talk:Jail]].--[[User:Scheibenzahl|Scheibenzahl]] 21:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
284532 +++$+++ Scheibenzahl +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284531 +++$+++ 284531 +++$+++ 2007-04-21 22:21:00 +++$+++ 1.177219260E09 +++$+++ Vielen vielen dank!-- +++$+++ :Vielen vielen dank!--[[User:Scheibenzahl|Scheibenzahl]] 22:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

22388 +++$+++ Cutler +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22388 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-03-13 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.205469900E09 +++$+++ Good work on this David! Did you use <nowiki><sup><\/nowiki> rather than <nowiki><small><\/nowiki> to shrink the text for any particular reason? I have picked up [[User:Swid]]'s point at [[Template talk:UK legislation]]. +++$+++ Good work on this David! Did you use <nowiki><sup></nowiki> rather than <nowiki><small></nowiki> to shrink the text for any particular reason? I have picked up [[User:Swid]]'s point at [[Template talk:UK legislation]].[[User:Cutler|Cutler]] ([[User talk:Cutler|talk]]) 21:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
22389 +++$+++ Cutler +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22388 +++$+++ 22388 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 12:48:00 +++$+++ 1.205696880E09 +++$+++ Now I would also like to include all the important info on each Act as per the Infobox but that leads to a huge column down the right. The answer would be to have a mini-version of the Infobox that could be hidden\/ autocollapsed like a NavBox. Any ideas how to do this? +++$+++ :Now I would also like to include all the important info on each Act as per the Infobox but that leads to a huge column down the right. The answer would be to have a mini-version of the Infobox that could be hidden/ autocollapsed like a NavBox. Any ideas how to do this?[[User:Cutler|Cutler]] ([[User talk:Cutler|talk]]) 12:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
22390 +++$+++ Cutler +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22388 +++$+++ 22389 +++$+++ 2008-03-16 17:45:00 +++$+++ 1.205714700E09 +++$+++ Done it - test soon. +++$+++ ::Done it - test soon.[[User:Cutler|Cutler]] ([[User talk:Cutler|talk]]) 17:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
22391 +++$+++ Cutler +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22388 +++$+++ 22390 +++$+++ 2008-03-20 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.206065580E09 +++$+++ OK, <nowiki><sup><\/nowiki> it is then. I had had a quick look and thought that they came out the same but if <nowiki><sup><\/nowiki> is shorter it is definitely superior. +++$+++ :::OK, <nowiki><sup></nowiki> it is then. I had had a quick look and thought that they came out the same but if <nowiki><sup></nowiki> is shorter it is definitely superior.[[User:Cutler|Cutler]] ([[User talk:Cutler|talk]]) 19:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

309566 +++$+++ Jprw +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309566 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-08 06:52:00 +++$+++ 1.265640720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help. Will try to implement your recommendations.  +++$+++ Thanks for your help. Will try to implement your recommendations. [[User:Jprw|Jprw]] ([[User talk:Jprw|talk]]) 06:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
309567 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309566 +++$+++ 309566 +++$+++ 2010-02-08 13:36:00 +++$+++ 1.265664960E09 +++$+++ Glad to assist. For an example of the harvnb template in use see [[Second voyage of HMS Beagle]], where clicking on a citation link in the text takes you to the author name, year and page numbers in the Notes. Clicking on the author name\/year links down to the source in the References section. .  +++$+++ :Glad to assist. For an example of the harvnb template in use see [[Second voyage of HMS Beagle]], where clicking on a citation link in the text takes you to the author name, year and page numbers in the Notes. Clicking on the author name/year links down to the source in the References section. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 13:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

284535 +++$+++ GoodDay +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284535 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-24 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.177476120E09 +++$+++ My changes lasted barely an hour, [[User:Orangemarlin|Orangemarlin]] caught me (see [[Bill Clinton]]).  +++$+++ My changes lasted barely an hour, [[User:Orangemarlin|Orangemarlin]] caught me (see [[Bill Clinton]]). [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] 21:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
284536 +++$+++ GoodDay +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284535 +++$+++ 284535 +++$+++ 2007-04-24 21:56:00 +++$+++ 1.177476960E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your support, ''Tvoz''. As for ''Orangemarlin's'' revert, to put it in American Political terms (in keeping with the subject), my edit has been 'vetoed'.  +++$+++ :Thanks for your support, ''Tvoz''. As for ''Orangemarlin's'' revert, to put it in American Political terms (in keeping with the subject), my edit has been 'vetoed'. [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] 21:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

550675 +++$+++ JeremyA +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550675 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2005-08-25 23:05:00 +++$+++ 1.125036300E09 +++$+++ Rather than trying to understand the Dutch wikipedia (I tried that once with limited success) maybe I can get some of the admins from there to come and contribute to the RfC. In the past I have been in email contact with [[User:Effeietsanders]] and I think another admin whose email escapes me at the moment.    +++$+++ Rather than trying to understand the Dutch wikipedia (I tried that once with limited success) maybe I can get some of the admins from there to come and contribute to the RfC. In the past I have been in email contact with [[User:Effeietsanders]] and I think another admin whose email escapes me at the moment.   [[User:JeremyA|JeremyA]] [[User_talk:JeremyA|(talk)]] 23:05, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
550676 +++$+++ Mario Roering +++$+++ Splash +++$+++ 550675 +++$+++ 550675 +++$+++ 2005-08-25 23:21:00 +++$+++ 1.125037260E09 +++$+++ The other admin you are thinking of could be [[User:Waerth|Waerth]]... Anyway, he is active on both the Dutch and English Wikipedia and he knows about the situation too! Hope I am helping out here... --  +++$+++ :The other admin you are thinking of could be [[User:Waerth|Waerth]]... Anyway, he is active on both the Dutch and English Wikipedia and he knows about the situation too! Hope I am helping out here... -- [[User:Mario Roering|Mario<font color="green">''R''</font>]] 23:21, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

284537 +++$+++ Finngall +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284537 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-25 23:08:00 +++$+++ 1.177567680E09 +++$+++ No, I think removing the ''speedy'' tag was reasonable, but I think an AfD nomination may be in order...Thanks. -- +++$+++ No, I think removing the ''speedy'' tag was reasonable, but I think an AfD nomination may be in order...Thanks. --[[User:Finngall|<font color="green"><b>Finngall</b></font>]] [[User Talk:Finngall|<font color="#D4A017"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 23:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
284538 +++$+++ Finngall +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284537 +++$+++ 284537 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.177568160E09 +++$+++ It works like [[WP:AFD|this]]... -- +++$+++ :It works like [[WP:AFD|this]]... --[[User:Finngall|<font color="green"><b>Finngall</b></font>]] [[User Talk:Finngall|<font color="#D4A017"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 23:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
284539 +++$+++ Finngall +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284537 +++$+++ 284538 +++$+++ 2007-04-25 23:28:00 +++$+++ 1.177568880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for pointing that one out.  I've gone ahead and redirected it. The original submitter can still pull stuff from old revisions and add it to the other article if desired. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks for pointing that one out.  I've gone ahead and redirected it. The original submitter can still pull stuff from old revisions and add it to the other article if desired. --[[User:Finngall|<font color="green"><b>Finngall</b></font>]] [[User Talk:Finngall|<font color="#D4A017"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 23:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

546682 +++$+++ W Nowicki +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546682 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-03 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.241416080E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] ([[User talk:W Nowicki|talk]]) 22:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
546683 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546682 +++$+++ 546682 +++$+++ 2009-05-04 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.241437200E09 +++$+++ Oops. (smacking my head). Sorry about my mistake with the text -- U.S. Department of the Interior info is definitely in the public domain -- and I should have looked more carefully at what I was reading. And you are correct about the reference change -- I only did that to provide others a quick verification of the info since the .gov site had failed. (The .gov site is preferable though). By the way, nice job with this set of articles and the photo uploads. Well done. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Oops. (smacking my head). Sorry about my mistake with the text -- U.S. Department of the Interior info is definitely in the public domain -- and I should have looked more carefully at what I was reading. And you are correct about the reference change -- I only did that to provide others a quick verification of the info since the .gov site had failed. (The .gov site is preferable though). By the way, nice job with this set of articles and the photo uploads. Well done. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 04:40, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
546684 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546682 +++$+++ 546682 +++$+++ 2009-05-04 04:51:00 +++$+++ 1.241437860E09 +++$+++ PS -- One thing I couldn't quite figure out - are Kuamo'o Burials and Lekeleke Burial Grounds interchangable names for the same site? <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :PS -- One thing I couldn't quite figure out - are Kuamo'o Burials and Lekeleke Burial Grounds interchangable names for the same site? <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 04:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

22395 +++$+++ Kevin Murray +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22395 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-04-06 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.207497600E09 +++$+++ I noticed that you started a list on US Army transport vessels.  Do you have any source material on a 150 foot transport vessel, General Frank M. Coxe, which was built in 1922 and decommissioned in about 1947?   It was used to transport personnel around San Francisco Bay with scheduled service from Fort Mason to Fort McDowell (Angel Island), and provided some services to Alcatraz during and before federal prison period.  It was later converted to a luxury tour ferry and finally to a floating restaurant.  After sitting as vacant hulk for 20 years, it was recently restored as a restaurant.  I'm working on an article and would appreciate any ideas or sources.  Thanks!  -- +++$+++ I noticed that you started a list on US Army transport vessels.  Do you have any source material on a 150 foot transport vessel, General Frank M. Coxe, which was built in 1922 and decommissioned in about 1947?   It was used to transport personnel around San Francisco Bay with scheduled service from Fort Mason to Fort McDowell (Angel Island), and provided some services to Alcatraz during and before federal prison period.  It was later converted to a luxury tour ferry and finally to a floating restaurant.  After sitting as vacant hulk for 20 years, it was recently restored as a restaurant.  I'm working on an article and would appreciate any ideas or sources.  Thanks!  --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] ([[User talk:Kevin Murray|talk]]) 09:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
22396 +++$+++ Kevin Murray +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22395 +++$+++ 22395 +++$+++ 2008-04-07 04:21:00 +++$+++ 1.207567260E09 +++$+++ I went ahead with [[General Frank M. Coxe (ship)]] as a start.  I'd appreciate your feedback.  Should we add it to the list of list on US Army transport vessels? -- +++$+++ : I went ahead with [[General Frank M. Coxe (ship)]] as a start.  I'd appreciate your feedback.  Should we add it to the list of list on US Army transport vessels? --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] ([[User talk:Kevin Murray|talk]]) 04:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

284541 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284541 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-25 23:39:00 +++$+++ 1.177569540E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your efforts in trying to keep some balance and perspective on the Catholicism subject. Near as I can tell, there are various pro-Catholic users who insist on posting Donohue's diatribe, unchallenged and with no background on his own biases, and won't discuss the matter. Any attempt at providing balance, they turn around and call it \"POV-pushing\". I think it's fair to cite ''to some extent'' the accusations of bias, but the source of those accusations has to be considered. Which I think is a point you're also trying to make. What a hassle.  +++$+++ Thank you for your efforts in trying to keep some balance and perspective on the Catholicism subject. Near as I can tell, there are various pro-Catholic users who insist on posting Donohue's diatribe, unchallenged and with no background on his own biases, and won't discuss the matter. Any attempt at providing balance, they turn around and call it "POV-pushing". I think it's fair to cite ''to some extent'' the accusations of bias, but the source of those accusations has to be considered. Which I think is a point you're also trying to make. What a hassle. [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 23:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
284542 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284541 +++$+++ 284541 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 00:20:00 +++$+++ 1.177572000E09 +++$+++ What to do? Well, semi-protection won't do it, as these are presumably established users. And, by the way, I am willing to admit that a number of the things she's said have been just plain stupid or like she was mentally ill or something. That point was being made on O'Reilly tonight, discussing today's face-saving decision on her part that she will be leaving ''The View'' in June, at the end of her one-year deal. There is no question she's gone off the deep end several times. But many of her most vociferous critics are fairly close to that deep end themselves. One solution here may be taking it to arbitration. However, it occurs to me that with the end of her ''View'' tenure in sight, maybe the interest (i.e. the Rosie-bashing) will die down.  +++$+++ :What to do? Well, semi-protection won't do it, as these are presumably established users. And, by the way, I am willing to admit that a number of the things she's said have been just plain stupid or like she was mentally ill or something. That point was being made on O'Reilly tonight, discussing today's face-saving decision on her part that she will be leaving ''The View'' in June, at the end of her one-year deal. There is no question she's gone off the deep end several times. But many of her most vociferous critics are fairly close to that deep end themselves. One solution here may be taking it to arbitration. However, it occurs to me that with the end of her ''View'' tenure in sight, maybe the interest (i.e. the Rosie-bashing) will die down. [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 00:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
284543 +++$+++ Wahkeenah +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284541 +++$+++ 284542 +++$+++ 2007-04-26 00:26:00 +++$+++ 1.177572360E09 +++$+++ You're probably right. It's a wait-and-see at this point. However, if someone refuses to discuss a POV issue, there's still the possibility of a Request for Comment. At the very least, if this nonsense continues, an admin should be consulted. I've found that endless edit wars are just that - endless - until an admin can be brought in, which is what we \"pay\" them to do. :)  +++$+++ ::You're probably right. It's a wait-and-see at this point. However, if someone refuses to discuss a POV issue, there's still the possibility of a Request for Comment. At the very least, if this nonsense continues, an admin should be consulted. I've found that endless edit wars are just that - endless - until an admin can be brought in, which is what we "pay" them to do. :) [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 00:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

546687 +++$+++ Matthew Francis +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546687 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-07 14:51:00 +++$+++ 1.241733060E09 +++$+++ So not a death threat.  +++$+++ So not a death threat. [[User:Matthew Francis|Matthew Francis]] ([[User talk:Matthew Francis|talk]]) 14:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
546688 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546687 +++$+++ 546687 +++$+++ 2009-05-10 13:21:00 +++$+++ 1.241986860E09 +++$+++ As I [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Matthew_Francis&diff=prev&oldid=288424941 stated to you] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk:Scientizzle&diff=prev&oldid=288425659 replied to your comment] to Scientizzle, at worst your edit can be read as death threat, but even at its best it is still inappropriate [[WP:TROLL|trolling]]. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :As I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Matthew_Francis&diff=prev&oldid=288424941 stated to you] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Scientizzle&diff=prev&oldid=288425659 replied to your comment] to Scientizzle, at worst your edit can be read as death threat, but even at its best it is still inappropriate [[WP:TROLL|trolling]]. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 13:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
546689 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546687 +++$+++ 546687 +++$+++ 2009-05-19 06:34:00 +++$+++ 1.242740040E09 +++$+++ First, I did not delete your page -- it was deleted (twice) by a Wikipedia administrator as can be seen [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Ryan_Caro&action=edit&redlink=1 here]. However, I did tag it for not meeting the notability requirements of an encyclopedic biography. Note that this is not a reflection on you, your life nor the accuracy of information -- it only means that it isn't right for an encyclopedia (as is the case for most people). You can read [[WP:BIOGRAPHY]] to see the minimum criteria needed for a stand-alone bio. More importantly, autobiographies are strongly discouraged on WP. See [[Wikipedia:Autobiography]] and [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. The bottom line is: until other people are writing about you, you won't meet the criteria. If you wish to contribute to WP, there are plenty of popular subjects which need to be written. Regards. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :First, I did not delete your page -- it was deleted (twice) by a Wikipedia administrator as can be seen [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ryan_Caro&action=edit&redlink=1 here]. However, I did tag it for not meeting the notability requirements of an encyclopedic biography. Note that this is not a reflection on you, your life nor the accuracy of information -- it only means that it isn't right for an encyclopedia (as is the case for most people). You can read [[WP:BIOGRAPHY]] to see the minimum criteria needed for a stand-alone bio. More importantly, autobiographies are strongly discouraged on WP. See [[Wikipedia:Autobiography]] and [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. The bottom line is: until other people are writing about you, you won't meet the criteria. If you wish to contribute to WP, there are plenty of popular subjects which need to be written. Regards. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 06:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

284545 +++$+++ Lawman8 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284545 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-30 19:06:00 +++$+++ 1.177985160E09 +++$+++ As explained in the talk page, previous Obama language is deceptive and POV because it may make the reader falsely believe that Obama has widespread police support when the reference states otherwise.  You seem to be fixated on this KCtoday thing, not the reasoning behind my logic.  Rather than try to achieve a NPOV, you just revert.  Why not compromise?  Bottlehead banned KCtoday, are you going to ask for the same thing?  If so, this isn't compromise, it is attack.  Let's work together. +++$+++ As explained in the talk page, previous Obama language is deceptive and POV because it may make the reader falsely believe that Obama has widespread police support when the reference states otherwise.  You seem to be fixated on this KCtoday thing, not the reasoning behind my logic.  Rather than try to achieve a NPOV, you just revert.  Why not compromise?  Bottlehead banned KCtoday, are you going to ask for the same thing?  If so, this isn't compromise, it is attack.  Let's work together.[[User:Lawman8|Lawman8]] 19:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
284546 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284545 +++$+++ 284545 +++$+++ 2007-04-30 19:09:00 +++$+++ 1.177985340E09 +++$+++ It's not going to work with me, Derek. Or whatever your  real name is.<strong> +++$+++ :It's not going to work with me, Derek. Or whatever your  real name is.<strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 19:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

546690 +++$+++ Keegan +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546690 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-23 07:15:00 +++$+++ 1.243088100E09 +++$+++ Just close your eyes and go for it.   +++$+++ Just close your eyes and go for it.  [[User:Keegan|<font color="maroon">Keegan</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Keegan|<font color="gray">talk</font>]]</small></sup> 07:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
546691 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546690 +++$+++ 546690 +++$+++ 2009-05-23 14:22:00 +++$+++ 1.243113720E09 +++$+++ Time? Already? Does the condemned get one last meal? I'm not certain whether this is a friendly push into the open or a quick shove off a cliff, but... okay, I'm in. I'll fill out the responses and add them tomorrow. Thanks for starting it up. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Time? Already? Does the condemned get one last meal? I'm not certain whether this is a friendly push into the open or a quick shove off a cliff, but... okay, I'm in. I'll fill out the responses and add them tomorrow. Thanks for starting it up. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

284547 +++$+++ Anynobody +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284547 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-04-30 23:04:00 +++$+++ 1.177999440E09 +++$+++ Hello <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] <\/strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]<\/small>, I'm sorry if there was some confusion but i wasn't referring to you. I noticed you were doing it correctly, however if you look at some other edits in the history I think you'll see what I mean. The attempts to help seem to be genuine, but the result is not very good (again I am being vague to avoid offending anyone who is trying to help. I didn't want to hold you up as an example and have the other editors see us both as know it all jerks. Sorry for the confusion,  +++$+++ Hello <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small>, I'm sorry if there was some confusion but i wasn't referring to you. I noticed you were doing it correctly, however if you look at some other edits in the history I think you'll see what I mean. The attempts to help seem to be genuine, but the result is not very good (again I am being vague to avoid offending anyone who is trying to help. I didn't want to hold you up as an example and have the other editors see us both as know it all jerks. Sorry for the confusion, [[User:Anynobody|Anynobody]] 23:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
284548 +++$+++ Anynobody +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284547 +++$+++ 284547 +++$+++ 2007-04-30 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.178001240E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=List_of_United_States_Presidential_names&curid=402001&diff=127275431&oldid=127275283 diff] this type of edit is more what I was referring to.  +++$+++ :[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_United_States_Presidential_names&curid=402001&diff=127275431&oldid=127275283 diff] this type of edit is more what I was referring to. [[User:Anynobody|Anynobody]] 23:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

22404 +++$+++ Pdfpdf +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22404 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-09-02 11:05:00 +++$+++ 1.220378700E09 +++$+++ Please excuse my appaling ignorance (and spelling); on [[Admiral of the Fleet (Royal Navy)]] you placed the edit summary \"(\u2192Admirals of the Fleet: cp)\". Could I bother you to tell me what \"cp\" means? Thanks,  +++$+++ Please excuse my appaling ignorance (and spelling); on [[Admiral of the Fleet (Royal Navy)]] you placed the edit summary "(→Admirals of the Fleet: cp)". Could I bother you to tell me what "cp" means? Thanks, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 11:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
22405 +++$+++ Pdfpdf +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22404 +++$+++ 22404 +++$+++ 2008-09-02 22:26:00 +++$+++ 1.220419560E09 +++$+++ Thanks,  +++$+++ :Thanks, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 22:26, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

546695 +++$+++ ChildofMidnight +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546695 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-26 03:51:00 +++$+++ 1.243335060E09 +++$+++ Hey Cactus. I just wanted to apologize if my use of the word stealth was taken by you or anyone else as an accusation of indiscretion. That was not my intention. I was trying to explain my concern over editors who may not have dealt with contentious editing scenarios and the issues involved in sorting out disputes. I think my concern over candidates haven't demonstrated their ability to handle trials is legitimate, but your RfA seems to be going very well and the level of support speaks well of your contributions to Wikipedia and the impression you've left on many other editors. Malleus, among others, has also made a good case that you have in fact proven your ability to handle yourself in difficult circumstances. Take care and good luck!  +++$+++ Hey Cactus. I just wanted to apologize if my use of the word stealth was taken by you or anyone else as an accusation of indiscretion. That was not my intention. I was trying to explain my concern over editors who may not have dealt with contentious editing scenarios and the issues involved in sorting out disputes. I think my concern over candidates haven't demonstrated their ability to handle trials is legitimate, but your RfA seems to be going very well and the level of support speaks well of your contributions to Wikipedia and the impression you've left on many other editors. Malleus, among others, has also made a good case that you have in fact proven your ability to handle yourself in difficult circumstances. Take care and good luck! [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 03:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
546696 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546695 +++$+++ 546695 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 08:00:00 +++$+++ 1.243350000E09 +++$+++ ChildofMidnight, I appreciate your taking the time to explain. I admit that when I read the word \"stealth\", my initial reaction was a big puzzled \"What?\" -- because it does imply something underhanded or sneaky. However, your follow-up response clearly stated that wasn't your intent. I agree that finding a candidate \"untested\" or \"inexperienced\" in disputes is a perfectly legitimate concern. And it can certainly be used as a rationale to oppose. Of course, from my POV, I don't consider my presence around WP to be either untested or simply gnomic (gnomish? gnomian? what's the adverb?). I have no fear of jumpng in [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Dr._Strangelove&diff=prev&oldid=250617700 to resolve a dispute] as I see fit. In fact, a group like Wikiproject Films is very active and 3O-type requests for help pop up with great frequency. These requests involve stamping out a myriad small fires -- from [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Defiance_(2008_film)#Neutrality_tag nationalist battles] to [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Films&diff=prev&oldid=247961881 to ending a simple argument over titles]. As well, I don't believe that Afds are simply about deletion -- but rather the reasonable resolution of a disputed article. This often means listening and  finding the right solution [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion\/John Morley (Garda S\xedoch\xe1na officer)|This is one quick example]]. But, as you say, you don't know me -- and I don't know you. However, it surprises how quickly WP shrinks over time, so I am certain we'll run into one another soon. Thanks again for the explanation and good luck to you too. Cheers <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :ChildofMidnight, I appreciate your taking the time to explain. I admit that when I read the word "stealth", my initial reaction was a big puzzled "What?" -- because it does imply something underhanded or sneaky. However, your follow-up response clearly stated that wasn't your intent. I agree that finding a candidate "untested" or "inexperienced" in disputes is a perfectly legitimate concern. And it can certainly be used as a rationale to oppose. Of course, from my POV, I don't consider my presence around WP to be either untested or simply gnomic (gnomish? gnomian? what's the adverb?). I have no fear of jumpng in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dr._Strangelove&diff=prev&oldid=250617700 to resolve a dispute] as I see fit. In fact, a group like Wikiproject Films is very active and 3O-type requests for help pop up with great frequency. These requests involve stamping out a myriad small fires -- from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Defiance_(2008_film)#Neutrality_tag nationalist battles] to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Films&diff=prev&oldid=247961881 to ending a simple argument over titles]. As well, I don't believe that Afds are simply about deletion -- but rather the reasonable resolution of a disputed article. This often means listening and  finding the right solution [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Morley (Garda Síochána officer)|This is one quick example]]. But, as you say, you don't know me -- and I don't know you. However, it surprises how quickly WP shrinks over time, so I am certain we'll run into one another soon. Thanks again for the explanation and good luck to you too. Cheers <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 08:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
546697 +++$+++ Bongomatic +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546695 +++$+++ 546696 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 08:46:00 +++$+++ 1.243352760E09 +++$+++ The adverb is probably gnomically, gnomimishly, or gnominanly&mdash;your three are all possible adjectival forms. <font color=\"green\"> +++$+++ ::The adverb is probably gnomically, gnomimishly, or gnominanly&mdash;your three are all possible adjectival forms. <font color="green">[[User Talk:Bongomatic|Bongo]]</font><font color="blue">[[Special:Contributions/Bongomatic|matic]]</font> 08:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
546698 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546695 +++$+++ 546697 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 09:23:00 +++$+++ 1.243354980E09 +++$+++ Ack!, yes, of course... adjectives. Thanks. Personally, I was leaning toward Frodoesque, but, of course, hobbit work must certainly be different. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Ack!, yes, of course... adjectives. Thanks. Personally, I was leaning toward Frodoesque, but, of course, hobbit work must certainly be different. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 09:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
546699 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546695 +++$+++ 546698 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 14:21:00 +++$+++ 1.243372860E09 +++$+++ Argh, the <font color=\"green\">Bongo<\/font> train is running off the track here. \"Gnomish\" is of course correct. Gnomic, admittedly an odd word, refers to the wisdom of often short, proverbial remarks, such as are often found in [[oral poetry]]. CWriter, I'm sure you studied your [[Anglo-Saxon literature]], where you will have come across plenty of examples, in such poems as \"[[The Wanderer]]\" and \"[[The Seafarer]].\" Happy reading, and good luck on your RfA. I'll look into it when I'm done memorizing ''[[Beowulf]]''.  +++$+++ ::::Argh, the <font color="green">Bongo</font> train is running off the track here. "Gnomish" is of course correct. Gnomic, admittedly an odd word, refers to the wisdom of often short, proverbial remarks, such as are often found in [[oral poetry]]. CWriter, I'm sure you studied your [[Anglo-Saxon literature]], where you will have come across plenty of examples, in such poems as "[[The Wanderer]]" and "[[The Seafarer]]." Happy reading, and good luck on your RfA. I'll look into it when I'm done memorizing ''[[Beowulf]]''. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 14:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
546700 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546695 +++$+++ 546699 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 15:02:00 +++$+++ 1.243375320E09 +++$+++ Wow -- you've got me cracking open the big Webster's. (Of course, it was right here: [[Gnomic]].) If only I had paid more attention back in high school freshman English. Fortunately for me, it ain't never too late to learn. Memorize ''[[Beowulf]]''?  Yeah... now that would be a feat. I think I'll stick with [[Beowulf (2007 film)]] instead. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::::Wow -- you've got me cracking open the big Webster's. (Of course, it was right here: [[Gnomic]].) If only I had paid more attention back in high school freshman English. Fortunately for me, it ain't never too late to learn. Memorize ''[[Beowulf]]''?  Yeah... now that would be a feat. I think I'll stick with [[Beowulf (2007 film)]] instead. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 15:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
546701 +++$+++ Drmies +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546695 +++$+++ 546700 +++$+++ 2009-05-26 15:41:00 +++$+++ 1.243377660E09 +++$+++ Please don't do that...we love you too much...  +++$+++ ::::::Please don't do that...we love you too much... [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 15:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

22411 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22411 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-03-25 16:58:00 +++$+++ 1.238025480E09 +++$+++ [[:File:Japanese.aircraft.carrier.hiryu.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Japanese aircraft carrier hiryu.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Japanese aircraft carrier hiryu.jpg]]<\/nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- +++$+++ [[:File:Japanese.aircraft.carrier.hiryu.jpg]] is now available on [[Wikimedia Commons]] as [[:Commons:File:Japanese aircraft carrier hiryu.jpg]]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: <nowiki>[[File:Japanese aircraft carrier hiryu.jpg]]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 16:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
22412 +++$+++ Erwin85Bot +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22411 +++$+++ 22411 +++$+++ 2009-10-25 19:03:00 +++$+++ 1.256522580E09 +++$+++ [[:File:C-87-liberator-express.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:C-87-liberator-express.jpg]]. -- +++$+++ :[[:File:C-87-liberator-express.jpg]] is now available as [[:Commons:File:C-87-liberator-express.jpg]]. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 19:03, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

284557 +++$+++ Wimt +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284557 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-07 22:20:00 +++$+++ 1.178601600E09 +++$+++ Hey - you're very welcome. Happy to help. [[User_talk:Wimt|Will]] <small><font color=\"red\">(aka  +++$+++ Hey - you're very welcome. Happy to help. [[User_talk:Wimt|Will]] <small><font color="red">(aka [[User:Wimt|<font color="red">Wimt</font>]])</font></small> 22:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
284558 +++$+++ Wimt +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284557 +++$+++ 284557 +++$+++ 2007-05-07 22:23:00 +++$+++ 1.178601780E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much! [[User_talk:Wimt|Will]] <small><font color=\"red\">(aka  +++$+++ :Thank you very much! [[User_talk:Wimt|Will]] <small><font color="red">(aka [[User:Wimt|<font color="red">Wimt</font>]])</font></small> 22:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

546702 +++$+++ Avraham +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-31 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.243774800E09 +++$+++ \u2026your [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/CactusWriter|RfA]] demonstrates that the Wikipedia project feels that you should be entrusted with the mop and flamethrower\u2122. You may wish to loosk at the following pages in the near future: [[Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide]], [[Wikipedia:Administrators\/Tools]], and [[Wikipedia:Administrators\/Tools]]. Now AfD is over yonder, your mop looks dry :) --  +++$+++ …your [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/CactusWriter|RfA]] demonstrates that the Wikipedia project feels that you should be entrusted with the mop and flamethrower™. You may wish to loosk at the following pages in the near future: [[Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide]], [[Wikipedia:Administrators/Tools]], and [[Wikipedia:Administrators/Tools]]. Now AfD is over yonder, your mop looks dry :) -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] ([[User talk:Avraham|talk]]) 06:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
546703 +++$+++ Chillum +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546702 +++$+++ 546702 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 06:13:00 +++$+++ 1.243775580E09 +++$+++ Welcome to the fold comrade! Please always try to represent administrators in a manner in which we can all be proud. My talk page is always available if you need advice or even just opinion. Congrats!  +++$+++ :Welcome to the fold comrade! Please always try to represent administrators in a manner in which we can all be proud. My talk page is always available if you need advice or even just opinion. Congrats! [[User talk:Chillum|<font color="Green">'''Chillum'''</font>]] 06:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
546704 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546702 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 06:19:00 +++$+++ 1.243775940E09 +++$+++ Thanks. And as I just told Keegan... it's sounds like when I graduated from college -- and then had to go to work for a living. Better start cracking the books. I'll keep your offer in mind. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Thanks. And as I just told Keegan... it's sounds like when I graduated from college -- and then had to go to work for a living. Better start cracking the books. I'll keep your offer in mind. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 06:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

546705 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546705 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-31 09:03:00 +++$+++ 1.243785780E09 +++$+++ Congratulations and best of luck. ;) \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ Congratulations and best of luck. ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 09:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
546706 +++$+++ Dank +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546705 +++$+++ 546705 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 12:02:00 +++$+++ 1.243796520E09 +++$+++ Congratulations. - Dank ( +++$+++ :Congratulations. - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 12:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
546707 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546705 +++$+++ 546706 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 12:08:00 +++$+++ 1.243796880E09 +++$+++ Thanks. I appreciated getting your comments there. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::Thanks. I appreciated getting your comments there. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 12:08, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
546708 +++$+++ Dlohcierekim +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546705 +++$+++ 546705 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.243803300E09 +++$+++ Congrats.  +++$+++ :Congrats. [[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#00ff00">  Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#bb00bb">cierekim''' </font>]] 13:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

284563 +++$+++ Feddhicks +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284563 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-14 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.179195420E09 +++$+++ If you aren't following me, why are you following Davidwr?  You don't have to answer, just tell Davidwr why!  Inhabit?  Look at your talk page, a large chunk of it is Barack Obama or Cat Stephens.  What does logical disjunction have to do with Astronaut Hall of Fame?  Don't bother to explain! +++$+++ If you aren't following me, why are you following Davidwr?  You don't have to answer, just tell Davidwr why!  Inhabit?  Look at your talk page, a large chunk of it is Barack Obama or Cat Stephens.  What does logical disjunction have to do with Astronaut Hall of Fame?  Don't bother to explain![[User:Feddhicks|Feddhicks]] 19:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
284564 +++$+++ Bobblehead +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284563 +++$+++ 284563 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 19:58:00 +++$+++ 1.179197880E09 +++$+++ Dude, seriously. Wah. At least try to assume some good faith.  Your comment on the Barack Obama talk page[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=128280647] was made six days before Tvoz ever made an edit on the AHOF page.[http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Astronaut_Hall_of_Fame&diff=130031207&oldid=129947420] If Tvoz was wikistalking you, why would she take 6 days to make an edit on the AHOF article? And since you seem to be pushing an agenda in regards to John Glenn.. Take a look at the names in the first class AHoF inductees, they are the seven [[Project Mercury]] astronauts. All of which (except Gus Grissom who died in the Apollo 1 accident) were instrumental in the creation of the AHoF museum. Go figure. The astronauts that pioneered the US's entry into manned spaceflight were the first class admitted into the AHoF. Shocking.. Scandalous. -- +++$+++ :Dude, seriously. Wah. At least try to assume some good faith.  Your comment on the Barack Obama talk page[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=128280647] was made six days before Tvoz ever made an edit on the AHOF page.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Astronaut_Hall_of_Fame&diff=130031207&oldid=129947420] If Tvoz was wikistalking you, why would she take 6 days to make an edit on the AHOF article? And since you seem to be pushing an agenda in regards to John Glenn.. Take a look at the names in the first class AHoF inductees, they are the seven [[Project Mercury]] astronauts. All of which (except Gus Grissom who died in the Apollo 1 accident) were instrumental in the creation of the AHoF museum. Go figure. The astronauts that pioneered the US's entry into manned spaceflight were the first class admitted into the AHoF. Shocking.. Scandalous. --[[User:Bobblehead|Bobblehead]] <sup>[[User talk:Bobblehead|(rants)]]</sup> 19:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

284565 +++$+++ Feddhicks +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284565 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-14 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.179198360E09 +++$+++ Tvoz made the comment soon after I edited about John Glenn.  That explains his delay. +++$+++ Tvoz made the comment soon after I edited about John Glenn.  That explains his delay.[[User:Feddhicks|Feddhicks]] 20:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
284566 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284565 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-14 23:26:00 +++$+++ 1.179210360E09 +++$+++ Feddhicks, here's a news flash: people are interested in more than one thing.  My user page talks about a few of the things I'm interested in (and also mentions that I'm female, so \"she\" works better for me), but is hardly a comprehensive list of my interests, and this talk page is far less than that - talk is mostly what other people post here. (Oh, and try \"contributions\" if you want an idea of where people edit.) As for the astronauts, you see I'm old enough to remember quite clearly when Shepard, and the others in the  Mercury seven, launched into space - I held my breath with my classmates in 5th grade when Glenn orbited the Earth - and so I have a lifelong interest in the space program,, especially Project Mercury, but Armstrong wasn't bad.  And my husband knows Rusty Schweickart, Edgar Mitchell and Storey Musgrave personally, so those guys are of interest to me too.  I was on the page for another reason (but I don't know who Davidwr is - I'll have to check him out now, thanks) and when I saw what to me was an odd inclusion about Glenn, I posted.  You are either not who you claim to be and so have reason to think I'd be stalking you,  or you are reacting to an edit in a really odd and inappropriate way.  I'll figure out which one it is soon enough.  Thanks Bobblehead - you of course have it right. <strong> +++$+++ ::Feddhicks, here's a news flash: people are interested in more than one thing.  My user page talks about a few of the things I'm interested in (and also mentions that I'm female, so "she" works better for me), but is hardly a comprehensive list of my interests, and this talk page is far less than that - talk is mostly what other people post here. (Oh, and try "contributions" if you want an idea of where people edit.) As for the astronauts, you see I'm old enough to remember quite clearly when Shepard, and the others in the  Mercury seven, launched into space - I held my breath with my classmates in 5th grade when Glenn orbited the Earth - and so I have a lifelong interest in the space program,, especially Project Mercury, but Armstrong wasn't bad.  And my husband knows Rusty Schweickart, Edgar Mitchell and Storey Musgrave personally, so those guys are of interest to me too.  I was on the page for another reason (but I don't know who Davidwr is - I'll have to check him out now, thanks) and when I saw what to me was an odd inclusion about Glenn, I posted.  You are either not who you claim to be and so have reason to think I'd be stalking you,  or you are reacting to an edit in a really odd and inappropriate way.  I'll figure out which one it is soon enough.  Thanks Bobblehead - you of course have it right. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 23:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

546710 +++$+++ Keegan +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546710 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-31 06:06:00 +++$+++ 1.243775160E09 +++$+++ So I guess that you noticed there was a reason behind my timing in a nomination :)  It was my pleasure, if ever I was proud of anything I've done here it's that RfA, and I really didn't even do that much...okay, I did plan all that but the credit goes to your record and what I record as the best answers I've ever read to RfA questions.  So here's to your newfound burden, by all means litter my page with questions if you have them.  Happy editing <sub><small>and mopping<\/sub><\/small> to you.  Thanks for your contributions.   +++$+++ So I guess that you noticed there was a reason behind my timing in a nomination :)  It was my pleasure, if ever I was proud of anything I've done here it's that RfA, and I really didn't even do that much...okay, I did plan all that but the credit goes to your record and what I record as the best answers I've ever read to RfA questions.  So here's to your newfound burden, by all means litter my page with questions if you have them.  Happy editing <sub><small>and mopping</sub></small> to you.  Thanks for your contributions.  [[User:Keegan|<font color="maroon">Keegan</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Keegan|<font color="gray">talk</font>]]</small></sup> 06:06, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
546711 +++$+++ Keegan +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546710 +++$+++ 546710 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.243776120E09 +++$+++ Heh, don't do too good of a job or in six month's time I'll try to land you in OTRS.  It's fun if you enjoy being punched in the face by 1's and 0's. Have fun, I meant everything I said about my perception of an admin's \"obligations\" and you seem to be of the same mindset so all will go fine.   +++$+++ :Heh, don't do too good of a job or in six month's time I'll try to land you in OTRS.  It's fun if you enjoy being punched in the face by 1's and 0's. Have fun, I meant everything I said about my perception of an admin's "obligations" and you seem to be of the same mindset so all will go fine.  [[User:Keegan|<font color="maroon">Keegan</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Keegan|<font color="gray">talk</font>]]</small></sup> 06:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
546712 +++$+++ Keegan +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546710 +++$+++ 546711 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 07:13:00 +++$+++ 1.243779180E09 +++$+++ By the way, you should check out [[WP:NAS|the new admin school]].  It even gives you the opportunity to block [[User:Keega\u1e47]] amongst other things.   +++$+++ ::By the way, you should check out [[WP:NAS|the new admin school]].  It even gives you the opportunity to block [[User:Keegaṇ]] amongst other things.  [[User:Keegan|<font color="maroon">Keegan</font>]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Keegan|<font color="gray">talk</font>]]</small></sup> 07:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

22423 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22423 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-12 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.260649020E09 +++$+++ Hi David. I am starting a GA review of [[HMS Belfast (C35)]], and I noted that the title has disambiguation brackets (C35) even though we only have the one article on a HMS Belfast, and that [[HMS Belfast]] redirects to [[HMS Belfast (C35)]]. The disambiguation brackets are not needed, are slightly problematic, so that, for example, the [[tl|find}} template has to be adjusted, as a search for \"HMS Belfast (C35)\" produces incorrect results, and are against the guidelines given in [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions]]. I don't wish to restore the title to [[HMS Belfast]], without passing it by you first. I am also notifying [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships]]. Regards <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ Hi David. I am starting a GA review of [[HMS Belfast (C35)]], and I noted that the title has disambiguation brackets (C35) even though we only have the one article on a HMS Belfast, and that [[HMS Belfast]] redirects to [[HMS Belfast (C35)]]. The disambiguation brackets are not needed, are slightly problematic, so that, for example, the [[tl|find}} template has to be adjusted, as a search for "HMS Belfast (C35)" produces incorrect results, and are against the guidelines given in [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions]]. I don't wish to restore the title to [[HMS Belfast]], without passing it by you first. I am also notifying [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships]]. Regards <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 12:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
22424 +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ David Newton +++$+++ 22423 +++$+++ 22423 +++$+++ 2009-12-14 07:34:00 +++$+++ 1.260804840E09 +++$+++ Looking at the ship's website amongst other things it does appear that HMS ''Belfast'' was the first ship of that name in the RN and there have (so far) not been any other vessels with the name since it decommissioned. Consequently according to the Wikipedia naming conventions you are perfectly correct.  +++$+++ :Looking at the ship's website amongst other things it does appear that HMS ''Belfast'' was the first ship of that name in the RN and there have (so far) not been any other vessels with the name since it decommissioned. Consequently according to the Wikipedia naming conventions you are perfectly correct. [[User:David Newton|David Newton]] ([[User talk:David Newton#top|talk]]) 07:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

284571 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284571 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-17 18:41:00 +++$+++ 1.179452460E09 +++$+++ Yes, the link in the article is dead, but I looked it up at ancestry.com just before I edited the article - so I added the citation. - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ Yes, the link in the article is dead, but I looked it up at ancestry.com just before I edited the article - so I added the citation. - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 18:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
284572 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284571 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.179800220E09 +++$+++ Just as a heads up, [[User:Cantwaitforit]]\/[[User:Zackfins54]] is continuing to insert misinformation at the page. - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ ::Just as a heads up, [[User:Cantwaitforit]]/[[User:Zackfins54]] is continuing to insert misinformation at the page. - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 19:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
284573 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284571 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 19:19:00 +++$+++ 1.179800340E09 +++$+++ Well, I imagined it was, and I see that he was blocked on the 18th because others held similar suspicions :) - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ :::Well, I imagined it was, and I see that he was blocked on the 18th because others held similar suspicions :) - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 19:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

284574 +++$+++ Zackfins54 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284574 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 19:30:00 +++$+++ 1.179801000E09 +++$+++ I would like you to know that I'm not the same person as Cantwaitforit. That is my sister's username and she went on a spree of fake edits last week, so our IP Address was blocked because we use the same computers. I do apologize for her vandalism, however, I stand behind all edits made under this username. I don't believe that Barbara Walters was born in 1929. There are just as many, actually more sources that cite her birth as 1931 rather than 1929. Also, I don't appreciate the way that you speak to me. I am not a five year old. I notice that a lot of your postings have a certain condescending \"I'm better than you\" tone to them.  +++$+++ I would like you to know that I'm not the same person as Cantwaitforit. That is my sister's username and she went on a spree of fake edits last week, so our IP Address was blocked because we use the same computers. I do apologize for her vandalism, however, I stand behind all edits made under this username. I don't believe that Barbara Walters was born in 1929. There are just as many, actually more sources that cite her birth as 1931 rather than 1929. Also, I don't appreciate the way that you speak to me. I am not a five year old. I notice that a lot of your postings have a certain condescending "I'm better than you" tone to them. [[User:Zackfins54|Zackfins54]] 19:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
284575 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284574 +++$+++ 284574 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.179803040E09 +++$+++ You have repeatedly changed the article, despite the extensive discussion on the Talk page - exactly the same way as \"Cantwaitforit\" did.  And your comment here is rather odd, since I haven't had any interactions with you before if you are not the same person - so I don't know what comments of mine you think are condescending or where you came upon them. I'm well aware that there is a discrepancy on the web regarding her birthdate - this was handled in a footnote long ago - and you have been told  about ancestry.com and the availability of records offline.  Your change is not correct, and edit warring is not the way to go about convincing anyone.  Get some real evidence and there will be something to talk about. I'm not convinced about your identity - others will have to decide for themselves. <strong> +++$+++ :You have repeatedly changed the article, despite the extensive discussion on the Talk page - exactly the same way as "Cantwaitforit" did.  And your comment here is rather odd, since I haven't had any interactions with you before if you are not the same person - so I don't know what comments of mine you think are condescending or where you came upon them. I'm well aware that there is a discrepancy on the web regarding her birthdate - this was handled in a footnote long ago - and you have been told  about ancestry.com and the availability of records offline.  Your change is not correct, and edit warring is not the way to go about convincing anyone.  Get some real evidence and there will be something to talk about. I'm not convinced about your identity - others will have to decide for themselves. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 20:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

284576 +++$+++ Zackfins54 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284576 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 20:06:00 +++$+++ 1.179803160E09 +++$+++ When I said that I don't appreciate the way you speak to me, I was referring to the note you made the last time you undid my edit, as well as the other postings you have made in the discussion section of the Walters article. And why is it that I am accused of edit warring simply because you don't agree with what I have changed? It takes two to make an edit war. I have provided a link to support my change so I don't see how you find it outside of reason.  +++$+++ When I said that I don't appreciate the way you speak to me, I was referring to the note you made the last time you undid my edit, as well as the other postings you have made in the discussion section of the Walters article. And why is it that I am accused of edit warring simply because you don't agree with what I have changed? It takes two to make an edit war. I have provided a link to support my change so I don't see how you find it outside of reason. [[User:Zackfins54|Zackfins54]] 20:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
284577 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284576 +++$+++ 284576 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.179804240E09 +++$+++ Because you are wrong.  I reverted you one time with an explanation. Nunh-huh reverted you with explanation. You ignored hidden text, you ignored  talk discussions, you just reverted. Add in the repeated identical changes that were done under the name Cantwaitforit and you'll understand why I say you are edit warring.. If you have anything more to say, please say it on the article talk page, not here.   I do not wish to continue this conversation.  <strong> +++$+++ :Because you are wrong.  I reverted you one time with an explanation. Nunh-huh reverted you with explanation. You ignored hidden text, you ignored  talk discussions, you just reverted. Add in the repeated identical changes that were done under the name Cantwaitforit and you'll understand why I say you are edit warring.. If you have anything more to say, please say it on the article talk page, not here.   I do not wish to continue this conversation.  <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 20:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

284578 +++$+++ Str1977 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284578 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-17 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.179462840E09 +++$+++ Spitting accusations and assuming bad faith will not get you far either. I was unaware of these but was in the process of fixing this (see my edit \"tidying\", and later \"more\") as you came in. Things don't happen instantly.  +++$+++ Spitting accusations and assuming bad faith will not get you far either. I was unaware of these but was in the process of fixing this (see my edit "tidying", and later "more") as you came in. Things don't happen instantly. [[User:Str1977|Str1977]] [[User talk:Str1977|<sup>(smile back)</sup>]] 21:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
284579 +++$+++ Str1977 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284578 +++$+++ 284578 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 21:54:00 +++$+++ 1.179464040E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ :[[User:Str1977|Str1977]] [[User talk:Str1977|<sup>(smile back)</sup>]] 21:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
284580 +++$+++ Str1977 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284578 +++$+++ 284579 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 21:57:00 +++$+++ 1.179464220E09 +++$+++ One more thing about the accident: you removed it a while before. I didn't know that. I saw that you reverted other edits as well and was under the impression that your current version and mine only differed in regard to \"my changes\". After saving, I found out my mistake and set out to tidying. It was bad timing that you happened to come along. (I am not blaming you, as you couldn't know that I was working on this already.)  +++$+++ ::One more thing about the accident: you removed it a while before. I didn't know that. I saw that you reverted other edits as well and was under the impression that your current version and mine only differed in regard to "my changes". After saving, I found out my mistake and set out to tidying. It was bad timing that you happened to come along. (I am not blaming you, as you couldn't know that I was working on this already.) [[User:Str1977|Str1977]] [[User talk:Str1977|<sup>(smile back)</sup>]] 21:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
284581 +++$+++ Str1977 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284578 +++$+++ 284580 +++$+++ 2007-05-17 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.179464460E09 +++$+++ Finally, do you have any opinion\/suggestion about the \"occupation\" issue?  +++$+++ :::Finally, do you have any opinion/suggestion about the "occupation" issue? [[User:Str1977|Str1977]] [[User talk:Str1977|<sup>(smile back)</sup>]] 22:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

546724 +++$+++ Ched Davis +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546724 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-20 21:34:00 +++$+++ 1.245558840E09 +++$+++ If only it were that easy ;-O \u2014 <small><span style=\"border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;\"><b> +++$+++ If only it were that easy ;-O — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 21:34, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
546725 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546724 +++$+++ 546724 +++$+++ 2009-06-21 07:26:00 +++$+++ 1.245594360E09 +++$+++ Ah, yes... those good ol' school days -- back when we could still say what we were actually thinking. And congrats on your successful Rfa. Welcome to the janitor's closet. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Ah, yes... those good ol' school days -- back when we could still say what we were actually thinking. And congrats on your successful Rfa. Welcome to the janitor's closet. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 07:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
546726 +++$+++ Keegan +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546724 +++$+++ 546724 +++$+++ 2009-06-30 08:54:00 +++$+++ 1.246377240E09 +++$+++ While my test account may have grown a brain, someday I hope to do so as well :)   +++$+++ :While my test account may have grown a brain, someday I hope to do so as well :)  [[User:Keegan|Keegan]] ([[User talk:Keegan|talk]]) 08:54, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

571718 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571718 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-31 04:08:00 +++$+++ 1.185880080E09 +++$+++ Hi, Dfrg.msc, and thanks for your participation in [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship\/Giggy|my RfA]].  I've withdrawn it, and will be writing up an \"analysis\" of it, which will soon be available at [[User:Giggy\/RfA\/Giggy]] when it's done.  Please come around when you get the chance, and give me feedback on how I can improve. Thanks again, [[User_talk:Giggy|<font color=\"green\">'''Giggy'''<\/font>]] <sub>[[User:Giggy|<font color=\"red\">U<\/font>]]<\/sub><sup> +++$+++ Hi, Dfrg.msc, and thanks for your participation in [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Giggy|my RfA]].  I've withdrawn it, and will be writing up an "analysis" of it, which will soon be available at [[User:Giggy/RfA/Giggy]] when it's done.  Please come around when you get the chance, and give me feedback on how I can improve. Thanks again, [[User_talk:Giggy|<font color="green">'''Giggy'''</font>]] <sub>[[User:Giggy|<font color="red">U</font>]]</sub><sup>[[User:Giggy/Contribs|<font color="orange">C</font>]]</sup>[[WP:FING|P]] 04:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
571719 +++$+++  +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571718 +++$+++ 571718 +++$+++ 2007-08-01 08:14:00 +++$+++ 1.185981240E09 +++$+++ I AM ALSO TYPING IN CAPS LOCK.  Sorry to see you're sick :( [[User_talk:Giggy|<font color=\"green\">'''Giggy'''<\/font>]] <sub>[[User:Giggy|<font color=\"red\">U<\/font>]]<\/sub><sup> +++$+++ :I AM ALSO TYPING IN CAPS LOCK.  Sorry to see you're sick :( [[User_talk:Giggy|<font color="green">'''Giggy'''</font>]] <sub>[[User:Giggy|<font color="red">U</font>]]</sub><sup>[[User:Giggy/Contribs|<font color="orange">C</font>]]</sup>[[WP:FING|P]] 08:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

284582 +++$+++ Capousa +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284582 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-18 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.179479460E09 +++$+++ ''Note: I do not know the person who referenced my article in the Paul entry but, I thank him for being objective.''-- +++$+++ ''Note: I do not know the person who referenced my article in the Paul entry but, I thank him for being objective.''--[[User:Capousa|Capousa]] 02:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
284583 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284582 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-23 20:48:00 +++$+++ 1.179978480E09 +++$+++ If only Phil Ochs were alive to see this on my talk page. <strong> +++$+++ ::If only Phil Ochs were alive to see this on my talk page. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 20:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

546727 +++$+++ Shreevatsa +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546727 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-23 16:24:00 +++$+++ 1.245799440E09 +++$+++ Hello, thanks again for taking the effort to verify the history of the [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre]] article, [[Home Rule Movement]], and others copied by the book. Seems it is a \"copyright violation\", on the [http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=zzbuJOC11BoC&pg=PR4 book]'s part!  +++$+++ Hello, thanks again for taking the effort to verify the history of the [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre]] article, [[Home Rule Movement]], and others copied by the book. Seems it is a "copyright violation", on the [http://books.google.com/books?id=zzbuJOC11BoC&pg=PR4 book]'s part! [[User:Shreevatsa|Shreevatsa]] ([[User talk:Shreevatsa|talk]]) 16:24, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
546728 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546727 +++$+++ 546727 +++$+++ 2009-06-24 09:43:00 +++$+++ 1.245861780E09 +++$+++ No problem. I've also left a message at [[Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics]] so that the ISHA book citations in other articles can be checked. Good luck. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :No problem. I've also left a message at [[Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics]] so that the ISHA book citations in other articles can be checked. Good luck. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 09:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

546730 +++$+++ AroundTheGlobe +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-25 16:21:00 +++$+++ 1.245972060E09 +++$+++ Kindly b careful when removing circular refs - I noticed u removed a proper ref along with a circular one on [[Swaminarayan Sampraday]]. Thanks, <strong> +++$+++ Kindly b careful when removing circular refs - I noticed u removed a proper ref along with a circular one on [[Swaminarayan Sampraday]]. Thanks, <strong>[[User:AroundTheGlobe|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkBlue">Around The Globe</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:AroundTheGlobe|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">सत्यमेव जयते</span></sup>]] 16:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
546731 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546730 +++$+++ 546730 +++$+++ 2009-06-25 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.245983160E09 +++$+++ You're right. Sorry about that accidental removal -- I mistook the \"ref name=\" of the adjoining ref as part of the offending ref. Thank you for correcting it back. It simply got caught in the blade as I reverted a dozen or so of these. However, I don't expect I will be deleting all of them. I had left a notice at Wikiproject India about invalid sources and hope that the editors involved with India articles will attend to the problem. I'm going to check back in a few days to see if it has been handled. Cheers. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :You're right. Sorry about that accidental removal -- I mistook the "ref name=" of the adjoining ref as part of the offending ref. Thank you for correcting it back. It simply got caught in the blade as I reverted a dozen or so of these. However, I don't expect I will be deleting all of them. I had left a notice at Wikiproject India about invalid sources and hope that the editors involved with India articles will attend to the problem. I'm going to check back in a few days to see if it has been handled. Cheers. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 19:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

546733 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546733 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-27 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.246136460E09 +++$+++ Not that I \"own\" the board (or want to), but I care about it and not letting backlog develop again. I tremendously appreciate your work there. :) -- +++$+++ Not that I "own" the board (or want to), but I care about it and not letting backlog develop again. I tremendously appreciate your work there. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 14:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
546734 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546733 +++$+++ 546733 +++$+++ 2009-06-27 14:24:00 +++$+++ 1.246137840E09 +++$+++ Aw, shucks... thank you! I appreciate that very much. I can't believe how diligently you rip that board every day -- it's impressive -- so I figured that you deserved at least one night off. Hope you enjoyed it -- maybe you'll get another one next year. :) <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Aw, shucks... thank you! I appreciate that very much. I can't believe how diligently you rip that board every day -- it's impressive -- so I figured that you deserved at least one night off. Hope you enjoyed it -- maybe you'll get another one next year. :) <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:24, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
546735 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546733 +++$+++ 546734 +++$+++ 2009-06-28 12:31:00 +++$+++ 1.246217460E09 +++$+++ You continue to rock. :D Maybe I will write an article today. I remember writing articles. :) -- +++$+++ ::You continue to rock. :D Maybe I will write an article today. I remember writing articles. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 12:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
546736 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546733 +++$+++ 546735 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 14:00:00 +++$+++ 1.247691600E09 +++$+++ Back to rocking. :) No pressure to keep it up intended by this note, but I just wanted to let you know that I do appreciate the assist and welcome whatever time and energy you have to put into it. I have long wished other admins would join in at CP. :) -- +++$+++ :::Back to rocking. :) No pressure to keep it up intended by this note, but I just wanted to let you know that I do appreciate the assist and welcome whatever time and energy you have to put into it. I have long wished other admins would join in at CP. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 14:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
546737 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546733 +++$+++ 546736 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 20:12:00 +++$+++ 1.247973120E09 +++$+++ I'm not quite back yet -- still on the road -- just checked in for a brief WP fix. Considering the problems that CP issues can cause, I'm surprised that you are the only admin weeding through that little jungle. Without you, there is no doubt it would be a completely overgrown disaster. For some oddball reason, I kind of like playing around in there. (Maybe the same oddball reason it appeals to you? Could it just be obligation? Sense of duty? Or is it some sort of internet masochism? Penance? Nah, who knows.) Anyway, I'm still leaving the more difficult problems for you to handle. I was glad you mentioned the [[User:Moonriddengirl\/cup]] template, I've now bookmarked a few of your other gems [[User:Moonriddengirl\/frequently used templates]] and[[User:Moonriddengirl\/Copyright cleanup]]). And will continue to follow your lead . I won't be back until the end of July, but you can count on my help. Feel free to give me a shout anytime. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::::I'm not quite back yet -- still on the road -- just checked in for a brief WP fix. Considering the problems that CP issues can cause, I'm surprised that you are the only admin weeding through that little jungle. Without you, there is no doubt it would be a completely overgrown disaster. For some oddball reason, I kind of like playing around in there. (Maybe the same oddball reason it appeals to you? Could it just be obligation? Sense of duty? Or is it some sort of internet masochism? Penance? Nah, who knows.) Anyway, I'm still leaving the more difficult problems for you to handle. I was glad you mentioned the [[User:Moonriddengirl/cup]] template, I've now bookmarked a few of your other gems [[User:Moonriddengirl/frequently used templates]] and[[User:Moonriddengirl/Copyright cleanup]]). And will continue to follow your lead . I won't be back until the end of July, but you can count on my help. Feel free to give me a shout anytime. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 20:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

284590 +++$+++ Gloriamarie +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284590 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 16:15:00 +++$+++ 1.179789300E09 +++$+++ (about the neutrality tag) Is it the same person taking it out or many people?-- +++$+++ (about the neutrality tag) Is it the same person taking it out or many people?--[[User:Gloriamarie|Gloriamarie]] 16:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
284591 +++$+++ Gloriamarie +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284590 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 16:49:00 +++$+++ 1.179791340E09 +++$+++ Perhaps we can watch who is taking it out and ban them?  I think it's OK the way it is now.-- +++$+++ ::Perhaps we can watch who is taking it out and ban them?  I think it's OK the way it is now.--[[User:Gloriamarie|Gloriamarie]] 16:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
284592 +++$+++ Gloriamarie +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284590 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 17:13:00 +++$+++ 1.179792780E09 +++$+++ OK, sounds good.-- +++$+++ :::OK, sounds good.--[[User:Gloriamarie|Gloriamarie]] 17:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

284593 +++$+++ Gloriamarie +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-21 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.179793200E09 +++$+++ Good idea.. I'm going through adding information in order as it appears in the article, but I'll do that when I'm done.-- +++$+++ Good idea.. I'm going through adding information in order as it appears in the article, but I'll do that when I'm done.--[[User:Gloriamarie|Gloriamarie]] 17:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
284594 +++$+++ Gloriamarie +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284593 +++$+++ 284593 +++$+++ 2007-05-21 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.179796920E09 +++$+++ I'll take another look. I'm not done yet. :)-- +++$+++ :I'll take another look. I'm not done yet. :)--[[User:Gloriamarie|Gloriamarie]] 18:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

546738 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546738 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-19 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.248033840E09 +++$+++ You should consider joining in at [[WP:COPYCLEAN]] when you settle in if you find you have an interest in the work. Occasionally, we need knowledgeable assistance with multiple-article infringements placed by one contributor. But even if that work doesn't interest you, just having more people around to answer questions and provide feedback is helpful, especially since sometimes copyvio work is gut-check rather than straightforward. -- +++$+++ You should consider joining in at [[WP:COPYCLEAN]] when you settle in if you find you have an interest in the work. Occasionally, we need knowledgeable assistance with multiple-article infringements placed by one contributor. But even if that work doesn't interest you, just having more people around to answer questions and provide feedback is helpful, especially since sometimes copyvio work is gut-check rather than straightforward. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 13:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
546739 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546738 +++$+++ 546738 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.248167460E09 +++$+++ Yikes... sorry to read about your upcoming \"time-off\" in August. I sincerely hope everything goes well for you. And, please... don't rush back on account of WP. Although a few narcotics could be a pleasant advantage around here, there is no need to push the envelope. I will definitely do whatever I can to help. I will be back home and on my regular schedule on August 1, and will be happy to keep an eye on your balliwick. Don't worry -- although the CP area will be incredibly deficient without your expertise -- we won't let it crash and burn during your absence. I promise. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Yikes... sorry to read about your upcoming "time-off" in August. I sincerely hope everything goes well for you. And, please... don't rush back on account of WP. Although a few narcotics could be a pleasant advantage around here, there is no need to push the envelope. I will definitely do whatever I can to help. I will be back home and on my regular schedule on August 1, and will be happy to keep an eye on your balliwick. Don't worry -- although the CP area will be incredibly deficient without your expertise -- we won't let it crash and burn during your absence. I promise. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 02:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
546740 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546738 +++$+++ 546739 +++$+++ 2009-07-21 18:22:00 +++$+++ 1.248225720E09 +++$+++ I expect I will be thrilled to be able to get back to WP. :) I will probably be very bored. But I thank you very much. I do sometimes fret about backlog at CP, and it means quite a lot to have you there. (Again, not that I want to create a sense of obligation. :D) -- +++$+++ ::I expect I will be thrilled to be able to get back to WP. :) I will probably be very bored. But I thank you very much. I do sometimes fret about backlog at CP, and it means quite a lot to have you there. (Again, not that I want to create a sense of obligation. :D) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 18:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
546741 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546738 +++$+++ 546738 +++$+++ 2009-07-13 21:42:00 +++$+++ 1.247546520E09 +++$+++ Hi, Spamd. Reading [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials#Granting us permission to copy material already online]] will give you a brief overview for getting permission to use the copyrighted text. If the organization sent permission to use their text, it doesn't appear to have been received by Wikipedia [[WP:OTRS]]. An administrator would have posted the OTRS permission on the article talk page showing that permission had been mailed. Because it wasn't there, I went ahead and removed the problematic portions and briefly rewrote the introduction. In truth, the easiest method for you to deal with copyrighted text is to rewrite the information from scratch (Simply use your own words without the benefit of looking at the original text. Then add citations for the source). If you have further problems, feel free to ask. Your efforts in dealing with this are appreciated.  <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Hi, Spamd. Reading [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials#Granting us permission to copy material already online]] will give you a brief overview for getting permission to use the copyrighted text. If the organization sent permission to use their text, it doesn't appear to have been received by Wikipedia [[WP:OTRS]]. An administrator would have posted the OTRS permission on the article talk page showing that permission had been mailed. Because it wasn't there, I went ahead and removed the problematic portions and briefly rewrote the introduction. In truth, the easiest method for you to deal with copyrighted text is to rewrite the information from scratch (Simply use your own words without the benefit of looking at the original text. Then add citations for the source). If you have further problems, feel free to ask. Your efforts in dealing with this are appreciated.  <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 21:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

22452 +++$+++ Samir +++$+++ Nephron +++$+++ 22452 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-11 04:01:00 +++$+++ 1.260532860E09 +++$+++ Great micrographs -- fantastic.  May take me a bit but I will add to [[colitis]].  Also have to work on [[Crohn's disease]].  Take care --  +++$+++ Great micrographs -- fantastic.  May take me a bit but I will add to [[colitis]].  Also have to work on [[Crohn's disease]].  Take care -- [[User:Samir|Samir]] 04:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
22453 +++$+++ Timberframe +++$+++ Nephron +++$+++ 22452 +++$+++ 22452 +++$+++ 2010-01-10 14:18:00 +++$+++ 1.263161880E09 +++$+++ Hi Nephron.  Can you explain the \"waste-basket\" sub-heading that you added last month [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Colitis&diff=next&oldid=330606726] in Colitis (in layman's terms) - it's got me baffled! Thanks --  +++$+++ :Hi Nephron.  Can you explain the "waste-basket" sub-heading that you added last month [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colitis&diff=next&oldid=330606726] in Colitis (in layman's terms) - it's got me baffled! Thanks -- [[User:Timberframe|Timberframe]] ([[User talk:Timberframe|talk]]) 14:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

546742 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546742 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-20 07:45:00 +++$+++ 1.248101100E09 +++$+++ I an considering going live with [[User:MichaelQSchmidt\/sandbox\/National Fibromyalgia Association]]. I'm feeling pretty good about 10 hours of work. Please take a look and advise of any concerns. Thank you,  +++$+++ I an considering going live with [[User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox/National Fibromyalgia Association]]. I'm feeling pretty good about 10 hours of work. Please take a look and advise of any concerns. Thank you, [[User:MichaelQSchmidt|MichaelQSchmidt]] ([[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|talk]]) 07:45, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
546743 +++$+++ MichaelQSchmidt +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546742 +++$+++ 546742 +++$+++ 2009-07-20 18:26:00 +++$+++ 1.248139560E09 +++$+++ Good eyes. Found a better ref in the [[St. Petersberg Times]] that more fully supports the section.  Very much appreciate your assist! +++$+++ :Good eyes. Found a better ref in the [[St. Petersberg Times]] that more fully supports the section.  Very much appreciate your assist![[User:MichaelQSchmidt|MichaelQSchmidt]] ([[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|talk]]) 18:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

309577 +++$+++ Sphilbrick +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-02-14 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.266217620E09 +++$+++ I just finished praising Nigel, but after looking again, I realize you did the heavy lifting. Nice. <font style=\"font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;\"> +++$+++ I just finished praising Nigel, but after looking again, I realize you did the heavy lifting. Nice. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#002868;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">SPhilbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style="background:#ADD8E6;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">T</span>]]</font> 23:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
309578 +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ Dave souza +++$+++ 309577 +++$+++ 309577 +++$+++ 2010-02-15 09:45:00 +++$+++ 1.266255900E09 +++$+++ Glad to assist, just fortunate that the IPCC chap got round to making a statement in today's paper. .  +++$+++ :Glad to assist, just fortunate that the IPCC chap got round to making a statement in today's paper. . [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 09:45, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

546744 +++$+++ BJBot +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546744 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-29 06:49:00 +++$+++ 1.248875340E09 +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"[[Special:Contributions\/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"File\" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned -->  +++$+++ If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 06:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
546745 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546744 +++$+++ 546744 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 07:00:00 +++$+++ 1.248876000E09 +++$+++ I'm deleting this old screen shot as unnecessary for film article.<span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :I'm deleting this old screen shot as unnecessary for film article.<span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 07:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

284601 +++$+++ Gloriamarie +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284601 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-22 17:20:00 +++$+++ 1.179879600E09 +++$+++ Have you been watching the John Edwards article for a while?  I would have sworn that the article included a pretty extensive Controversies section a few months ago, and now that information is completely removed.  I put this on the talk page there, too.--- +++$+++ Have you been watching the John Edwards article for a while?  I would have sworn that the article included a pretty extensive Controversies section a few months ago, and now that information is completely removed.  I put this on the talk page there, too.---[[User:Gloriamarie|Gloriamarie]] 17:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
284602 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284601 +++$+++ 284601 +++$+++ 2007-05-22 18:29:00 +++$+++ 1.179883740E09 +++$+++ Answered - in a way-too-long comment on [[Talk:John Edwards]]. <strong> +++$+++ :Answered - in a way-too-long comment on [[Talk:John Edwards]]. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 18:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

546746 +++$+++ Student7 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-30 12:44:00 +++$+++ 1.248983040E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your help. As I explained to the bot father, I copied the material from another (unflagged) Wikipedia article, not from outside material. I never looked at the outside material; particularly afterward when I was afraid I would unconsciously mimic it, there being so few facts in the article anyway. I have 20,000 edits and 30 articles and am well aware of Wikipedia's policy on copyright violations. Thanks for your assistance in cleaning up this article.  +++$+++ Thank you for your help. As I explained to the bot father, I copied the material from another (unflagged) Wikipedia article, not from outside material. I never looked at the outside material; particularly afterward when I was afraid I would unconsciously mimic it, there being so few facts in the article anyway. I have 20,000 edits and 30 articles and am well aware of Wikipedia's policy on copyright violations. Thanks for your assistance in cleaning up this article. [[User:Student7|Student7]] ([[User talk:Student7|talk]]) 12:44, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
546747 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 2009-07-30 12:57:00 +++$+++ 1.248983820E09 +++$+++ Since I am currently talkstalking CactusWriter, I have left a note clarifying licensing issues in copying from one article to another at your talk page. -- +++$+++ :Since I am currently talkstalking CactusWriter, I have left a note clarifying licensing issues in copying from one article to another at your talk page. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 12:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
546748 +++$+++ MLauba +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546747 +++$+++ 2009-07-30 13:14:00 +++$+++ 1.248984840E09 +++$+++ Just a question, why hasn't the text at the temporary subpage been used or the subpage been deleted? ([[Talk:St. Patrick's High School (Liberia)\/Temp]])  +++$+++ ::Just a question, why hasn't the text at the temporary subpage been used or the subpage been deleted? ([[Talk:St. Patrick's High School (Liberia)/Temp]]) [[User:MLauba|MLauba]] ([[User talk:MLauba|talk]]) 13:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
546749 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546748 +++$+++ 2009-07-30 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.248990720E09 +++$+++ Whoops -- I had read through the talk pages, but didn't even notice that a temporary page had been created. Thanks for pointing that out to me. MLauba and Student7, you both did a much better rewrite than I did, so I'm going to delete the old version and replace it with your temp version. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Whoops -- I had read through the talk pages, but didn't even notice that a temporary page had been created. Thanks for pointing that out to me. MLauba and Student7, you both did a much better rewrite than I did, so I'm going to delete the old version and replace it with your temp version. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
546750 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546749 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.249062240E09 +++$+++ Those temporary pages used to be easier to see before Stifle created the \"don't delete this\" header (which is useful enough to be worth the hassle, since before that header those pages were sometimes speedily deleted by admins who didn't understand why they were there). I've missed a few myself, so I usually try to remember to click on it even if I don't think the blue link is blue enough to suggest it's been filled out. :) -- +++$+++ ::::Those temporary pages used to be easier to see before Stifle created the "don't delete this" header (which is useful enough to be worth the hassle, since before that header those pages were sometimes speedily deleted by admins who didn't understand why they were there). I've missed a few myself, so I usually try to remember to click on it even if I don't think the blue link is blue enough to suggest it's been filled out. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 10:44, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
546751 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546750 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 11:01:00 +++$+++ 1.249063260E09 +++$+++ Okay. Good advice. I'll try to get in the habit of clicking that link as a part of the process. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::::Okay. Good advice. I'll try to get in the habit of clicking that link as a part of the process. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 11:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
546752 +++$+++ MLauba +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546750 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 11:03:00 +++$+++ 1.249063380E09 +++$+++ {{conflict}}Well, on the copyvio template, it appears blue even when empty as soon as I place the template, at least in my two browsers of choice, so it is indeed darn easy to miss. Oh, and thanks for the kind words, CW :)  +++$+++ :::::{{conflict}}Well, on the copyvio template, it appears blue even when empty as soon as I place the template, at least in my two browsers of choice, so it is indeed darn easy to miss. Oh, and thanks for the kind words, CW :) [[User:MLauba|MLauba]] ([[User talk:MLauba|talk]]) 11:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
546753 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546752 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 11:20:00 +++$+++ 1.249064400E09 +++$+++ It gets bluer when filled out. Or bolder. Compare [[Branch Line Press]] and [[Lubna Olayan]]. It can be easy to miss, though, so I check anyway. :) -- +++$+++ ::::::It gets bluer when filled out. Or bolder. Compare [[Branch Line Press]] and [[Lubna Olayan]]. It can be easy to miss, though, so I check anyway. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 11:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
546754 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546753 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 15:50:00 +++$+++ 1.249080600E09 +++$+++ Ow, my eyes. You are right - there is a difference between the Really Blue and Really-Really-I'm-Not-Kidding-It-Got-Bolder Blue. But I think it's better for me just to click the link without trying to figure out which blue it is. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::::::Ow, my eyes. You are right - there is a difference between the Really Blue and Really-Really-I'm-Not-Kidding-It-Got-Bolder Blue. But I think it's better for me just to click the link without trying to figure out which blue it is. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 15:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
546755 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546754 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 16:18:00 +++$+++ 1.249082280E09 +++$+++ Wow! I've just noticed another difference, too! :O There's an arrow when there isn't a page; there's no arrow when there is. ''That's'' probably the easiest to detect difference! -- +++$+++ ::::::::Wow! I've just noticed another difference, too! :O There's an arrow when there isn't a page; there's no arrow when there is. ''That's'' probably the easiest to detect difference! --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 16:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
546756 +++$+++ MLauba +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546754 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 16:40:00 +++$+++ 1.249083600E09 +++$+++ I don't see any difference :( and I know I'm not supposed to be colour blind... Perhaps drinking will help?  +++$+++ ::::::::I don't see any difference :( and I know I'm not supposed to be colour blind... Perhaps drinking will help? [[User:MLauba|MLauba]] ([[User talk:MLauba|talk]]) 16:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
546757 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546756 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 18:56:00 +++$+++ 1.249091760E09 +++$+++ Ah, now the arrow I can see. What is this -- one of those \"find five differences\" puzzles? And in these puzzle games, drinking probably couldn't hurt. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::::::::Ah, now the arrow I can see. What is this -- one of those "find five differences" puzzles? And in these puzzle games, drinking probably couldn't hurt. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 18:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
546758 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 2009-07-30 15:47:00 +++$+++ 1.248994020E09 +++$+++ This was a clear misstatement since the major news stories (like this [http:\/\/archives.cbc.ca\/society\/youth\/topics\/1633\/]) and the NY Times article appeared years previous to Hahn's. Again, it was requested that the statement be sourced or removed. It remained unsourced and was finally removed. If you have references for the above statement, please add them. If you wish to discuss this further, I suggest that it be continued on the article talk page, so that other interested editors might weigh in. (By the way, you may not have realized it, but it is improper to blank or delete other editors comments from the article talk pages -- that is why I reverted your edits there.) <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :This was a clear misstatement since the major news stories (like this [http://archives.cbc.ca/society/youth/topics/1633/]) and the NY Times article appeared years previous to Hahn's. Again, it was requested that the statement be sourced or removed. It remained unsourced and was finally removed. If you have references for the above statement, please add them. If you wish to discuss this further, I suggest that it be continued on the article talk page, so that other interested editors might weigh in. (By the way, you may not have realized it, but it is improper to blank or delete other editors comments from the article talk pages -- that is why I reverted your edits there.) <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 15:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
546759 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546746 +++$+++ 546748 +++$+++ 2009-07-31 07:47:00 +++$+++ 1.249051620E09 +++$+++ I think a reference to The Fund for Investigative Journalism would be a great addition to Hahn's bio. ([http:\/\/www.freedommag.org\/english\/canada\/reports\/page03.htm This link] is actually a clearer mention). Although, unfortunately, Hahn is not mentioned as a recipient at the [http:\/\/fij.org\/grants\/past.php fund's website] and [http:\/\/www.arcticbeacon.com\/articles\/14%20Mar.%202007.html she seems to say] that the fund withdrew her grant in 2001 while she worked at [[W-FIVE]]. The real problem here is that this is supposed to be a biographical article about Hahn and yet there are almost no independent references for her. A few bi-lines and a brief interview by a fringe (and, as you say, inaccurate) radio journalist do not provide much substance for a [[WP:BLP]] article. If you can provide some good references which describe Hahn's career and background, than that would be helpful. At the moment, there doesn't appear to be enough [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] for an article about her.<span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::I think a reference to The Fund for Investigative Journalism would be a great addition to Hahn's bio. ([http://www.freedommag.org/english/canada/reports/page03.htm This link] is actually a clearer mention). Although, unfortunately, Hahn is not mentioned as a recipient at the [http://fij.org/grants/past.php fund's website] and [http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/14%20Mar.%202007.html she seems to say] that the fund withdrew her grant in 2001 while she worked at [[W-FIVE]]. The real problem here is that this is supposed to be a biographical article about Hahn and yet there are almost no independent references for her. A few bi-lines and a brief interview by a fringe (and, as you say, inaccurate) radio journalist do not provide much substance for a [[WP:BLP]] article. If you can provide some good references which describe Hahn's career and background, than that would be helpful. At the moment, there doesn't appear to be enough [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] for an article about her.<span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 07:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

22460 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Nephron +++$+++ 22460 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-11-22 20:52:00 +++$+++ 1.290487920E09 +++$+++ An article is not allowed to have redlinked categories on it \u2014 the fact that {{cl|Placenta}} shows up as a red link means that the category ''does not exist''. If you want the {{tl|uncat}} tag to come off [[chorangioma]], you need to find and add categories that actually exist.  +++$+++ An article is not allowed to have redlinked categories on it — the fact that {{cl|Placenta}} shows up as a red link means that the category ''does not exist''. If you want the {{tl|uncat}} tag to come off [[chorangioma]], you need to find and add categories that actually exist. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 20:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
22461 +++$+++ Bearcat +++$+++ Nephron +++$+++ 22460 +++$+++ 22460 +++$+++ 2010-11-23 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.290514200E09 +++$+++ Anyway, as for why ''I'' didn't create the category myself: firstly, based on how we organize categories I don't think it would be the most appropriate category for the article anyway \u2014 we categorize things by what they are, not by related keywords, so the categories that are added to the article generally need to be able to complete the sentence \"TITLE is a CATEGORY\". Chorangioma is a placenta? Not really, no \u2014 according to your article, it's a disease or disorder of some kind, and should be placed in the same categories as other directly related diseases or disorders. And secondly, given that I'm mostly unfamiliar with medical terminology, even if I did create {{cl|Placenta}} I'd have no idea where to file it in the category system.  +++$+++ : Anyway, as for why ''I'' didn't create the category myself: firstly, based on how we organize categories I don't think it would be the most appropriate category for the article anyway — we categorize things by what they are, not by related keywords, so the categories that are added to the article generally need to be able to complete the sentence "TITLE is a CATEGORY". Chorangioma is a placenta? Not really, no — according to your article, it's a disease or disorder of some kind, and should be placed in the same categories as other directly related diseases or disorders. And secondly, given that I'm mostly unfamiliar with medical terminology, even if I did create {{cl|Placenta}} I'd have no idea where to file it in the category system. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 04:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

284605 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284605 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-24 03:21:00 +++$+++ 1.180002060E09 +++$+++ I just have to say this.  Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.  Back to editing now. <strong> +++$+++ I just have to say this.  Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.  Back to editing now. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 03:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
284606 +++$+++ Gloriamarie +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284605 +++$+++ 284605 +++$+++ 2007-05-25 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.180153680E09 +++$+++ In a good or bad way?  I saw it as well.  I usually read spoilers from a site that reveals a little, not a lot, and last week they unfortunately ran some spoilers that gave the entire season finale away... I would have liked it a lot better if it had a surprise factor for me.-- +++$+++ :In a good or bad way?  I saw it as well.  I usually read spoilers from a site that reveals a little, not a lot, and last week they unfortunately ran some spoilers that gave the entire season finale away... I would have liked it a lot better if it had a surprise factor for me.--[[User:Gloriamarie|Gloriamarie]] 21:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

353269 +++$+++ GabrielVelasquez +++$+++ Zginder +++$+++ 353269 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-30 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.199007900E09 +++$+++ I did a thorough browsing of your user profile, and must say,<br \/> '''y'r special.''' <br \/>- +++$+++ I did a thorough browsing of your user profile, and must say,<br /> '''y'r special.''' <br />-[[User:GabrielVelasquez|GabrielVelasquez]] ([[User talk:GabrielVelasquez|talk]]) 01:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
353270 +++$+++ GabrielVelasquez +++$+++ Zginder +++$+++ 353269 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-01-05 07:27:00 +++$+++ 1.199546820E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your help with photos.<br \/> +++$+++ :::Thanks for your help with photos.<br />[[User:GabrielVelasquez|GabrielVelasquez]] ([[User talk:GabrielVelasquez|talk]]) 07:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

284608 +++$+++ Chrishomingtang +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284608 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-25 22:17:00 +++$+++ 1.180156620E09 +++$+++ Hi. Yes, I am working on it, but I plan not to add everything in the season in the season overview since I just review [[24 (Season 5)]] and the season overview there is short and not everything is there, take a look. Feel free to comment. One more thing, don't put too much details since the section is getting too long.  +++$+++ Hi. Yes, I am working on it, but I plan not to add everything in the season in the season overview since I just review [[24 (Season 5)]] and the season overview there is short and not everything is there, take a look. Feel free to comment. One more thing, don't put too much details since the section is getting too long. [[User:Chrishomingtang|Chris]] 22:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
284609 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284608 +++$+++ 284608 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 05:42:00 +++$+++ 1.180269720E09 +++$+++ No - I think I already have told you this, but I don't mind saying it  again:  the personal connection I have to Kent State is that I was a 19 year old college student in NY on May 4, 1970, peacefully, and loudly, protesting Nixon's expansion of the war into Cambodia on my college campus, and when I heard the news later that day I knew - like all students protesting that day around the country - that it could have been me. Or any of my friends. In some sense it was us.  Can you understand that? I don't know if you have yet grasped the horror of that day, Equinox - you give lip service to it, but then you spend all of your energy defending the guardsmen and trying to find actions of the students that would somehow justify this use of force and its horrific results.  Four young people were killed  and nine wounded that day by American soldiers, on an American college campus - not in an act of self defense.  The students weren't armed. Some weren't even protesting.  You can say over and over that you think the protests weren't legal - except that in the United States people have a Constitutional right to assemble and therefore to protest, which is a higher authority than some college president or even a Governor (who in fact did not declare martial law). You can tell me that you think the Guardsmen felt threatened, but they were the ones with the bullets and clearly they knew that.  You can tell me that these things happen, but they never did before, and they never should. Their parents sent them off to college - do you understand they were just kids going to college, not agent provocateurs, not terrorists, not violent radicals - as you well know, one was ROTC - and they had a right to believe that they would be safe on their campus, and not attacked by our own soldiers.  It was a horrific day, Equinox, and those of us who lived through it will never forget it.  I feel an obligation to Jeff, Sandy, Allison, and Bill - and to my own children - and yours - to make sure that people know what happened that day, and to do whatever I can to prevent it from happening again.  To tell the story -fairly, but thoroughly.  I didn't have to have a personal connection to them - I am them.  <strong> +++$+++ :No - I think I already have told you this, but I don't mind saying it  again:  the personal connection I have to Kent State is that I was a 19 year old college student in NY on May 4, 1970, peacefully, and loudly, protesting Nixon's expansion of the war into Cambodia on my college campus, and when I heard the news later that day I knew - like all students protesting that day around the country - that it could have been me. Or any of my friends. In some sense it was us.  Can you understand that? I don't know if you have yet grasped the horror of that day, Equinox - you give lip service to it, but then you spend all of your energy defending the guardsmen and trying to find actions of the students that would somehow justify this use of force and its horrific results.  Four young people were killed  and nine wounded that day by American soldiers, on an American college campus - not in an act of self defense.  The students weren't armed. Some weren't even protesting.  You can say over and over that you think the protests weren't legal - except that in the United States people have a Constitutional right to assemble and therefore to protest, which is a higher authority than some college president or even a Governor (who in fact did not declare martial law). You can tell me that you think the Guardsmen felt threatened, but they were the ones with the bullets and clearly they knew that.  You can tell me that these things happen, but they never did before, and they never should. Their parents sent them off to college - do you understand they were just kids going to college, not agent provocateurs, not terrorists, not violent radicals - as you well know, one was ROTC - and they had a right to believe that they would be safe on their campus, and not attacked by our own soldiers.  It was a horrific day, Equinox, and those of us who lived through it will never forget it.  I feel an obligation to Jeff, Sandy, Allison, and Bill - and to my own children - and yours - to make sure that people know what happened that day, and to do whatever I can to prevent it from happening again.  To tell the story -fairly, but thoroughly.  I didn't have to have a personal connection to them - I am them.  <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 05:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
284610 +++$+++ Equinox137 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284608 +++$+++ 284609 +++$+++ 2007-05-27 05:57:00 +++$+++ 1.180270620E09 +++$+++ Ok, thanks.   +++$+++ ::Ok, thanks.  [[User:Equinox137|Equinox137]] 05:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

22468 +++$+++ Jeanambr +++$+++ Viva-Verdi +++$+++ 22468 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-03 17:42:00 +++$+++ 1.307148120E09 +++$+++ Hi. I think I have found some sources about the mysterious overture of [[Il viaggio a Reims]]. Could you be so kind as to check my editing? Thank you very much. -- +++$+++ Hi. I think I have found some sources about the mysterious overture of [[Il viaggio a Reims]]. Could you be so kind as to check my editing? Thank you very much. --[[User:Jeanambr|Jeanambr]] ([[User talk:Jeanambr|talk]]) 17:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
22469 +++$+++ Viva-Verdi +++$+++ Viva-Verdi +++$+++ 22468 +++$+++ 22468 +++$+++ 2011-06-04 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.307171460E09 +++$+++ As I noted in my comments re: the text revision, this seems to be a clear justification for including copy on the lack of an overture. Thaanks for doing this. I did make a minor change: \"critic\" edition is \"critical\" edition.  +++$+++ :As I noted in my comments re: the text revision, this seems to be a clear justification for including copy on the lack of an overture. Thaanks for doing this. I did make a minor change: "critic" edition is "critical" edition. [[User:Viva-Verdi|Viva-Verdi]] ([[User talk:Viva-Verdi#top|talk]]) 00:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

22471 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Viva-Verdi +++$+++ 22471 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-20 18:53:00 +++$+++ 1.308621180E09 +++$+++ Thanks!  --  +++$+++ Thanks!  -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 18:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
22472 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Viva-Verdi +++$+++ 22471 +++$+++ 22471 +++$+++ 2011-06-20 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.308621720E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message.  It seems to me that Boum should be in the table rather than Puck.  In the Crespin recording, [[Robert Massard]]  played Boum, and in the Lott recording, [[Fran\xe7ois Le Roux]] played Boum.  All the best, --  +++$+++ :Thanks for the message.  It seems to me that Boum should be in the table rather than Puck.  In the Crespin recording, [[Robert Massard]]  played Boum, and in the Lott recording, [[François Le Roux]] played Boum.  All the best, -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 19:02, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
22473 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Viva-Verdi +++$+++ 22471 +++$+++ 22472 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 00:34:00 +++$+++ 1.308641640E09 +++$+++ I figured out how to fill in the chart, but I can't figure out how to do the CD and DVD numbers.  Can you please fill in the last column?  Thanks for any assistance.  All the best, --  +++$+++ ::I figured out how to fill in the chart, but I can't figure out how to do the CD and DVD numbers.  Can you please fill in the last column?  Thanks for any assistance.  All the best, -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 00:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
22474 +++$+++ Ssilvers +++$+++ Viva-Verdi +++$+++ 22471 +++$+++ 22473 +++$+++ 2011-06-21 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.308655740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the responses.   Best regards, --  +++$+++ :::Thanks for the responses.   Best regards, -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 04:29, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

546761 +++$+++ Rsrikanth05 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-05 10:33:00 +++$+++ 1.249493580E09 +++$+++ Can you please userfy Buereau of Energy Efficiency for me? I created that article, and I would like to re-create it and this I would like to add some details and make sure it does NOT violate any policies. -- +++$+++ Can you please userfy Buereau of Energy Efficiency for me? I created that article, and I would like to re-create it and this I would like to add some details and make sure it does NOT violate any policies. --[[User:Rsrikanth05|Rsrikanth05]] ([[User talk:Rsrikanth05|talk]]) 10:33, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
546762 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546761 +++$+++ 546761 +++$+++ 2009-08-05 10:54:00 +++$+++ 1.249494840E09 +++$+++ Okay. The article can now be found at [[User:Rsrikanth05\/Bureau of Energy Efficiency]]. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Okay. The article can now be found at [[User:Rsrikanth05/Bureau of Energy Efficiency]]. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 10:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
546763 +++$+++ Rsrikanth05 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546761 +++$+++ 546761 +++$+++ 2009-08-05 14:09:00 +++$+++ 1.249506540E09 +++$+++ Thanks a lot. :D Cheers... -- +++$+++ :Thanks a lot. :D Cheers... --[[User:Rsrikanth05|Rsrikanth05]] ([[User talk:Rsrikanth05|talk]]) 14:09, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

22475 +++$+++ Softlavender +++$+++ Viva-Verdi +++$+++ 22475 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-07 00:11:00 +++$+++ 1.310022660E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Softlavender|Softlavender]] ([[User talk:Softlavender|talk]]) 00:11, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
22476 +++$+++ Viva-Verdi +++$+++ Viva-Verdi +++$+++ 22475 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-07-07 03:17:00 +++$+++ 1.310033820E09 +++$+++ So, please don't mess around any further with a structure which has the support of the WPO group, and which is gradually being implemented.  +++$+++ ::So, please don't mess around any further with a structure which has the support of the WPO group, and which is gradually being implemented. [[User:Viva-Verdi|Viva-Verdi]] ([[User talk:Viva-Verdi#top|talk]]) 03:17, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

284620 +++$+++ Pipermantolisopa +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-05-31 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.180619460E09 +++$+++ Ok, give me a minute and the talk page will have a good explanation. +++$+++ Ok, give me a minute and the talk page will have a good explanation.[[User:Pipermantolisopa|Pipermantolisopa]] 06:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
284621 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284620 +++$+++ 284620 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 07:25:00 +++$+++ 1.180621500E09 +++$+++ No, that is not a good explanation. You are edit warring, and POV pushing, and not discussing changes that objections are being raised about.  <strong> +++$+++ :No, that is not a good explanation. You are edit warring, and POV pushing, and not discussing changes that objections are being raised about.  <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 07:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
284622 +++$+++ Pipermantolisopa +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284620 +++$+++ 284621 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.180639080E09 +++$+++ This is only testing the water.  Ron Paul has more problems than just a reference or two. +++$+++ ::This is only testing the water.  Ron Paul has more problems than just a reference or two.[[User:Pipermantolisopa|Pipermantolisopa]] 12:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
284623 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284620 +++$+++ 284622 +++$+++ 2007-05-31 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.180649640E09 +++$+++ And this has nothing whatsoever to do with Ron Paul.  Stop this now. <strong> +++$+++ :::And this has nothing whatsoever to do with Ron Paul.  Stop this now. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 15:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

22477 +++$+++ Kleinzach +++$+++ Viva-Verdi +++$+++ 22477 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-07-12 01:49:00 +++$+++ 1.310460540E09 +++$+++ Please see: '''[[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Classical_music\/Style_guidelines#References:_expansion_of_guideline|Classical Music References]]''' about the proposed development of this guideline. Thanks. --'' +++$+++ Please see: '''[[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Classical_music/Style_guidelines#References:_expansion_of_guideline|Classical Music References]]''' about the proposed development of this guideline. Thanks. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 01:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
22478 +++$+++ Kleinzach +++$+++ Viva-Verdi +++$+++ 22477 +++$+++ 22477 +++$+++ 2011-08-02 05:24:00 +++$+++ 1.312287840E09 +++$+++ The new guideline was approved for the [[WP:CM]] projects on 28 July, see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Classical_music\/Style_guidelines#References]]. Regards. --'' +++$+++ :The new guideline was approved for the [[WP:CM]] projects on 28 July, see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Classical_music/Style_guidelines#References]]. Regards. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 05:24, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

576865 +++$+++ Aude +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576865 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-08-31 21:08:00 +++$+++ 1.283314080E09 +++$+++ Anyway, from this past weekend, here's construction progress of [[One World Trade Center]]. [http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/kmf164\/4942996547]  Cheers. -- +++$+++ Anyway, from this past weekend, here's construction progress of [[One World Trade Center]]. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/kmf164/4942996547]  Cheers. --[[User:Aude|Aude]] <small>([[User talk:Aude|talk]])</small> 21:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
576866 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576865 +++$+++ 576865 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.283337900E09 +++$+++ Ah...nice shot...I read the other day it was now over 350 feet...only 1,426 feet left! Nice to hear from you...yes, do resume if and when you have time...you are sorely missed.-- +++$+++ :Ah...nice shot...I read the other day it was now over 350 feet...only 1,426 feet left! Nice to hear from you...yes, do resume if and when you have time...you are sorely missed.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 03:45, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
576867 +++$+++ Aude +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576865 +++$+++ 576866 +++$+++ 2010-09-01 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.283383380E09 +++$+++ I'd like to do another featured article or two... just need to try not to get too distracted on the talk pages and just work on articles with what time I can spare.  (and have reviewing help) -- +++$+++ ::I'd like to do another featured article or two... just need to try not to get too distracted on the talk pages and just work on articles with what time I can spare.  (and have reviewing help) --[[User:Aude|Aude]] <small>([[User talk:Aude|talk]])</small> 16:23, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
576868 +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ MONGO +++$+++ 576865 +++$+++ 576867 +++$+++ 2010-09-02 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.283410800E09 +++$+++ Let me know..I can add what I can and I promise not to nominate it for FA as I did after you did ALL the work on Banff NP...sorry about that one.-- +++$+++ :::Let me know..I can add what I can and I promise not to nominate it for FA as I did after you did ALL the work on Banff NP...sorry about that one.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 00:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

546768 +++$+++ Spamd +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546768 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-10 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.249965780E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Spamd|Spamd]] ([[User talk:Spamd|talk]]) 21:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
546769 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546768 +++$+++ 546768 +++$+++ 2009-08-11 07:51:00 +++$+++ 1.250002260E09 +++$+++ Now, as far as the content dispute goes: a quick google news search shows Hutchison's dismissal from KIRO, her subsequent lawsuit and the recent court order about sealed information are significant events. These are not rumors, but are reported in the large metropolitan newspapers [http:\/\/seattletimes.nwsource.com\/html\/localnews\/2009620447_hutchisonrecords07m.html], [http:\/\/blog.seattlepi.com\/seattlepolitics\/archives\/175754.asp]. Yet, her WP bio doesn't mention these events at all. [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Criticism and praise|Biographies of living persons]] should include both criticism and praise when it is significant. I think a couple of sentences about these events, written in a neutral, encyclopedic tone, should be added to this article. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Now, as far as the content dispute goes: a quick google news search shows Hutchison's dismissal from KIRO, her subsequent lawsuit and the recent court order about sealed information are significant events. These are not rumors, but are reported in the large metropolitan newspapers [http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009620447_hutchisonrecords07m.html], [http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/archives/175754.asp]. Yet, her WP bio doesn't mention these events at all. [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Criticism and praise|Biographies of living persons]] should include both criticism and praise when it is significant. I think a couple of sentences about these events, written in a neutral, encyclopedic tone, should be added to this article. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 07:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

284625 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284625 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-02 00:03:00 +++$+++ 1.180767780E09 +++$+++ Tvoz, I'm sorry that I didn't respond to the message that you left on my talk page the other day ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAkhilleus&diff=134437590&oldid=134344842]) about possible Dereks1x socks. If it hasn't already been handled, probably the best thing to do is inform Jersyko, or start a new Checkuser request; but if you think I can help, feel free to post on my talk page or email me.  +++$+++ Tvoz, I'm sorry that I didn't respond to the message that you left on my talk page the other day ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAkhilleus&diff=134437590&oldid=134344842]) about possible Dereks1x socks. If it hasn't already been handled, probably the best thing to do is inform Jersyko, or start a new Checkuser request; but if you think I can help, feel free to post on my talk page or email me. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 00:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
284626 +++$+++ Akhilleus +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284625 +++$+++ 284625 +++$+++ 2007-06-02 03:33:00 +++$+++ 1.180780380E09 +++$+++ Whoops, I guess that was kind of clueless of me. Anyway, if I can assist let me know.  +++$+++ :Whoops, I guess that was kind of clueless of me. Anyway, if I can assist let me know. [[User:Akhilleus|--Akhilleus]] ([[User talk:Akhilleus|talk]]) 03:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

546770 +++$+++ HJKeats +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546770 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-11 12:36:00 +++$+++ 1.250019360E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much for reverting the article to pre-copyvio status. I should become more familiar with the type of tools you use such that I can apply some corrective measures to the 4,700+ articles I monitor. Again thanks for your help, -- +++$+++ Thank you very much for reverting the article to pre-copyvio status. I should become more familiar with the type of tools you use such that I can apply some corrective measures to the 4,700+ articles I monitor. Again thanks for your help, --[[User:HJKeats|HJKeats]] ([[User talk:HJKeats|talk]]) 12:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
546771 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546770 +++$+++ 546770 +++$+++ 2009-08-11 12:49:00 +++$+++ 1.250020140E09 +++$+++ No problem. Thanks for keeping such a watchful eye. Or eyes. 4700+? You must be a [[compound eye|busy bee]]. Cheers. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :No problem. Thanks for keeping such a watchful eye. Or eyes. 4700+? You must be a [[compound eye|busy bee]]. Cheers. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 12:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
546772 +++$+++ HJKeats +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546770 +++$+++ 546771 +++$+++ 2009-08-11 13:04:00 +++$+++ 1.250021040E09 +++$+++ Not so bad, all the articles I keep a keen eye on (whenever I can now mind ya) are of a common theme \"Everything Newfoundland\" :-) -- +++$+++ ::Not so bad, all the articles I keep a keen eye on (whenever I can now mind ya) are of a common theme "Everything Newfoundland" :-) --[[User:HJKeats|HJKeats]] ([[User talk:HJKeats|talk]]) 13:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
546773 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546770 +++$+++ 546772 +++$+++ 2009-08-11 13:16:00 +++$+++ 1.250021760E09 +++$+++ Wow. 4700 Newfoundland articles! I didn't realize that. Cool. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Wow. 4700 Newfoundland articles! I didn't realize that. Cool. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 13:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

114226 +++$+++ Wipsenade +++$+++ Lothar von Richthofen +++$+++ 114226 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-18 11:55:00 +++$+++ 1.300474500E09 +++$+++ The UK is anti-Gadhafi, but France is very anti-Gadhafi (oil?) and the USA got cold feet since it is worried about a new Afghanistan\/Iraq style endless troop commitment crisis.  +++$+++ The UK is anti-Gadhafi, but France is very anti-Gadhafi (oil?) and the USA got cold feet since it is worried about a new Afghanistan/Iraq style endless troop commitment crisis. [[User:Wipsenade|Wipsenade]] ([[User talk:Wipsenade|talk]]) 11:55, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
114227 +++$+++ Lothar von Richthofen +++$+++ Lothar von Richthofen +++$+++ 114226 +++$+++ 114226 +++$+++ 2011-03-18 11:58:00 +++$+++ 1.300474680E09 +++$+++ That is all very well, but it seems to be [[WP:OR]] and should not be in the article. ~~  +++$+++ :That is all very well, but it seems to be [[WP:OR]] and should not be in the article. ~~ [[User:Lothar von Richthofen|Lothar von Richthofen]] ([[User talk:Lothar von Richthofen#top|talk]]) 11:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

546774 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-13 13:33:00 +++$+++ 1.250195580E09 +++$+++ Re: [[Aerides multiflorum]] at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems\/2009 August 5]], that was a new one! Kind of interesting, sometimes, figuring out how to handle these. :) -- +++$+++ Re: [[Aerides multiflorum]] at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 August 5]], that was a new one! Kind of interesting, sometimes, figuring out how to handle these. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 13:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
546775 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546774 +++$+++ 546774 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.250195880E09 +++$+++ Wow! You answered it already. I was just in the middle of researching a response to that one. Glad to see it was a lot easier than I thought. (I actually found a PD text that the contributor could use to fix it). Oh, well. Learn somethin' new... <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Wow! You answered it already. I was just in the middle of researching a response to that one. Glad to see it was a lot easier than I thought. (I actually found a PD text that the contributor could use to fix it). Oh, well. Learn somethin' new... <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 13:38, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
546776 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546774 +++$+++ 546775 +++$+++ 2009-08-13 13:44:00 +++$+++ 1.250196240E09 +++$+++ Nothing wrong with proposing that, too. I see that the contributor has recently usurped an account at the Spanish Wikipedia. :) -- +++$+++ ::Nothing wrong with proposing that, too. I see that the contributor has recently usurped an account at the Spanish Wikipedia. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 13:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

546777 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-16 22:35:00 +++$+++ 1.250487300E09 +++$+++ Hi CactusWriter! I just wanted to let you know that I reused your \"close paraphrasing\" message [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATjmayerinsf&diff=308371419&oldid=308221514 here]. I hope you don't mind. By the way, I noticed that you live in Denmark. Kan du prata svenska? :) ''''' +++$+++ Hi CactusWriter! I just wanted to let you know that I reused your "close paraphrasing" message [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATjmayerinsf&diff=308371419&oldid=308221514 here]. I hope you don't mind. By the way, I noticed that you live in Denmark. Kan du prata svenska? :) '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 22:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
546778 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546777 +++$+++ 546777 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 04:48:00 +++$+++ 1.250509680E09 +++$+++ Great. Feel free to use it. ...Og, nej, det kan jeg ikke. Desv\xe6rre. Jeg kan kun snakke Dansk -- med en utrolig voldsom Amerikansk udtale. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Great. Feel free to use it. ...Og, nej, det kan jeg ikke. Desværre. Jeg kan kun snakke Dansk -- med en utrolig voldsom Amerikansk udtale. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 04:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

546779 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546779 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-18 14:45:00 +++$+++ 1.250631900E09 +++$+++ Hey CactusWriter. Sorry to bother you again, but should [[87th Pennsylvania Infantry]], [[126th Ohio Infantry]], and [[138th Pennsylvania Infantry]] be listed at [[WP:CP]]? The author says it is a \"bot error\", but it seems to me like the text is copied from petersburgbreakthrough.org. Thanks, --''''' +++$+++ Hey CactusWriter. Sorry to bother you again, but should [[87th Pennsylvania Infantry]], [[126th Ohio Infantry]], and [[138th Pennsylvania Infantry]] be listed at [[WP:CP]]? The author says it is a "bot error", but it seems to me like the text is copied from petersburgbreakthrough.org. Thanks, --'''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 14:45, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
546780 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546779 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 15:08:00 +++$+++ 1.250633280E09 +++$+++ No bother at all. I appreciate you asking. In this case, the bot wasn't wrong because the text was copied -- however, it appears to be in the public domain. The website shows the source as ''Source - A Compendium of the War of the Rebellion by Frederick H. Dyer''. It's a book published in 1908 which places it in the PD. Here's [http:\/\/home.nps.gov\/stri\/historyculture\/upload\/Ohio_Dyer_1st%20Artillery,%20Battery%20E.pdf the online version] at the US Park Service. It appears most every Civil War website uses the same source. So its use is okay. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::No bother at all. I appreciate you asking. In this case, the bot wasn't wrong because the text was copied -- however, it appears to be in the public domain. The website shows the source as ''Source - A Compendium of the War of the Rebellion by Frederick H. Dyer''. It's a book published in 1908 which places it in the PD. Here's [http://home.nps.gov/stri/historyculture/upload/Ohio_Dyer_1st%20Artillery,%20Battery%20E.pdf the online version] at the US Park Service. It appears most every Civil War website uses the same source. So its use is okay. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 15:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
546781 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546779 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 15:22:00 +++$+++ 1.250634120E09 +++$+++ Oh, I didn't see that. Thanks for taking a look! :) ''''' +++$+++ :::Oh, I didn't see that. Thanks for taking a look! :) '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 15:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

546782 +++$+++ Rsrikanth05 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546782 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-17 16:17:00 +++$+++ 1.250551020E09 +++$+++ User Hemant17 keeps removing stuff from my talk page and user page and despite warnings, he says he has full right to do whatever he feels with his contributions. Please Comment.-- +++$+++ User Hemant17 keeps removing stuff from my talk page and user page and despite warnings, he says he has full right to do whatever he feels with his contributions. Please Comment.--[[User:Rsrikanth05|Rsrikanth05]] ([[User talk:Rsrikanth05|talk]]) 16:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
546783 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546782 +++$+++ 546782 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.250559060E09 +++$+++ Okay. I'll take a look. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Okay. I'll take a look. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 18:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
546784 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546782 +++$+++ 546783 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 19:18:00 +++$+++ 1.250561880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I am sorry that you have had problems with this editor -- especially after you tried to help him. I see that he hasn't reverted any edits or touched your user page since your last message to him. I have had a discussion with him today. It is probable that it all stems from his rough introduction to article writing, which has been a series of problems and deletions - and appears to have left him frustrated. I'll keep a watch and take action if there is any return to uncivil behavior. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I am sorry that you have had problems with this editor -- especially after you tried to help him. I see that he hasn't reverted any edits or touched your user page since your last message to him. I have had a discussion with him today. It is probable that it all stems from his rough introduction to article writing, which has been a series of problems and deletions - and appears to have left him frustrated. I'll keep a watch and take action if there is any return to uncivil behavior. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 19:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

546785 +++$+++ Rsrikanth05 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546785 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-18 15:05:00 +++$+++ 1.250633100E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Rsrikanth05|Rsrikanth05]] ([[User talk:Rsrikanth05|talk]]) 15:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
546786 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546785 +++$+++ 546785 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 15:19:00 +++$+++ 1.250633940E09 +++$+++ Thank you, Rsrikanth05. I appreciate the nice thought. I'm glad you're having a better day, too. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Thank you, Rsrikanth05. I appreciate the nice thought. I'm glad you're having a better day, too. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 15:19, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
546787 +++$+++ Rsrikanth05 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546785 +++$+++ 546785 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 18:11:00 +++$+++ 1.250644260E09 +++$+++ NO problems at all. Have a happy Day... :D -- +++$+++ : NO problems at all. Have a happy Day... :D --[[User:Rsrikanth05|Rsrikanth05]] ([[User talk:Rsrikanth05|talk]]) 18:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

284642 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284642 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-23 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.182609000E09 +++$+++ hello - I responded to your question there <strong> +++$+++ hello - I responded to your question there <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 07:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
284643 +++$+++ Redl@nds597198 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284642 +++$+++ 284642 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.182609120E09 +++$+++ Thanks, that page is a great help. \u2022 +++$+++ :Thanks, that page is a great help. •[[User:Redl@nds597198|<font color="#FF3300" face="century gothic"><b>97198</b></font>]] <small>[[User talk:Redl@nds597198|<font color="#000000" face="century gothic">talk</font>]]</small> 07:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
284644 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284642 +++$+++ 284643 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 07:38:00 +++$+++ 1.182609480E09 +++$+++ Also, [[WP:TM]] gives an overview of other template pages - very useful.  Have fun! <strong> +++$+++ ::Also, [[WP:TM]] gives an overview of other template pages - very useful.  Have fun! <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 07:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
284645 +++$+++ Redl@nds597198 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284642 +++$+++ 284644 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 07:42:00 +++$+++ 1.182609720E09 +++$+++ Thanks again, I'll see what I can find! \u2022 +++$+++ :::Thanks again, I'll see what I can find! •[[User:Redl@nds597198|<font color="#FF3300" face="century gothic"><b>97198</b></font>]] <small>[[User talk:Redl@nds597198|<font color="#000000" face="century gothic">talk</font>]]</small> 07:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

546788 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546788 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-18 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.250653740E09 +++$+++ This is ridiculous. Nothing in those sources say that there is a branch of the Atrash clan in Egypt, he have made it up himself. The only thing it says is about Alia fleeing Syria with her children to Egypt, this is not a branch nor has it ever been a branch. These people are dead. -- +++$+++ This is ridiculous. Nothing in those sources say that there is a branch of the Atrash clan in Egypt, he have made it up himself. The only thing it says is about Alia fleeing Syria with her children to Egypt, this is not a branch nor has it ever been a branch. These people are dead. --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 20:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
546789 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546788 +++$+++ 546788 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.250654340E09 +++$+++ From what I read, each of the sources appear to support the claims as written in the text of the article -- that some members of a Druze family named Atrash emigrated to Egypt. You will need to refute those sources. As I said in the edit summary, take the discussion to the talk page. I have no interest in the matter other that to see an end to the edit war. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :From what I read, each of the sources appear to support the claims as written in the text of the article -- that some members of a Druze family named Atrash emigrated to Egypt. You will need to refute those sources. As I said in the edit summary, take the discussion to the talk page. I have no interest in the matter other that to see an end to the edit war. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 20:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
546790 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546788 +++$+++ 546789 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.250655180E09 +++$+++ No they do not support the claims he have written, there is no branch, nothing in the sources say its a branch, one mother and her 3 children (all of them dead) is not a branch of a clan consisting of thousands of people. Listen, me and this guy have been arguing over the Asmahan article for almost half a year (thats right) we have been through 3 mediators (him not listening to the first two and going against what the third mediator\/administrator has said on several issues) and rfcs, I'm not gonna take it to the talkpage cause he doesn't listen to common sense or other peoples opinions, only engaging in edit warring. I was the one that told him several times that he couldn't plagiarize in the Asmahan article and he didn't listen. So I would really appreciate it if you yourself do not want to get involved in this at the talkpage and mediate, that you do not interfere when I remove this false information from the article.-- +++$+++ ::No they do not support the claims he have written, there is no branch, nothing in the sources say its a branch, one mother and her 3 children (all of them dead) is not a branch of a clan consisting of thousands of people. Listen, me and this guy have been arguing over the Asmahan article for almost half a year (thats right) we have been through 3 mediators (him not listening to the first two and going against what the third mediator/administrator has said on several issues) and rfcs, I'm not gonna take it to the talkpage cause he doesn't listen to common sense or other peoples opinions, only engaging in edit warring. I was the one that told him several times that he couldn't plagiarize in the Asmahan article and he didn't listen. So I would really appreciate it if you yourself do not want to get involved in this at the talkpage and mediate, that you do not interfere when I remove this false information from the article.--[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 21:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
546791 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546788 +++$+++ 546790 +++$+++ 2009-08-18 21:35:00 +++$+++ 1.250656500E09 +++$+++ If you want to end the edit war you should lock the article at its original state at 2 August.-- +++$+++ :::If you want to end the edit war you should lock the article at its original state at 2 August.--[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 21:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
546792 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546788 +++$+++ 546791 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 07:37:00 +++$+++ 1.250692620E09 +++$+++ What I see is an [[Atrash|article]] which has been entirely unreferenced since its creation. Now that one editor is adding some sourced information for the article, your only contributions have been blanket deletions. If you actually want to improve the article -- than get some references. If you have problems with the language (like the word \"branch\") -- than reword it. Your blanket reversions are outside of [[WP:STATUSQUO|process]] and your persistence in doing so is [[WP:EW|edit warring]] (After your previous block, I would expect you to be familiar with this.) I am peripherally familiar with the long-running disputes and litany of complaints between you and the other editor. It appears to me that this continued petty bickering and POV-pushing from both sides is becoming disruptive and may require a topic ban for each of you. My advice is: learn to cooperate or find some other articles to edit. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::::What I see is an [[Atrash|article]] which has been entirely unreferenced since its creation. Now that one editor is adding some sourced information for the article, your only contributions have been blanket deletions. If you actually want to improve the article -- than get some references. If you have problems with the language (like the word "branch") -- than reword it. Your blanket reversions are outside of [[WP:STATUSQUO|process]] and your persistence in doing so is [[WP:EW|edit warring]] (After your previous block, I would expect you to be familiar with this.) I am peripherally familiar with the long-running disputes and litany of complaints between you and the other editor. It appears to me that this continued petty bickering and POV-pushing from both sides is becoming disruptive and may require a topic ban for each of you. My advice is: learn to cooperate or find some other articles to edit. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 07:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
546793 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546788 +++$+++ 546792 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 10:47:00 +++$+++ 1.250704020E09 +++$+++ Therese a difference between adding information to an article and adding text that is of absolutely no relevance to the article. You have a message here: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AAtrash&diff=308857746&oldid=308843646 -- +++$+++ :::::Therese a difference between adding information to an article and adding text that is of absolutely no relevance to the article. You have a message here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAtrash&diff=308857746&oldid=308843646 --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 10:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
546794 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546788 +++$+++ 546793 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.250705700E09 +++$+++ I have replied on the article talk page. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::::: I have replied on the article talk page. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 11:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
546795 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546788 +++$+++ 546794 +++$+++ 2009-08-19 12:29:00 +++$+++ 1.250710140E09 +++$+++ you have reply: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AAtrash&diff=308869340&oldid=308860945 -- +++$+++ :::::::you have reply: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAtrash&diff=308869340&oldid=308860945 --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 12:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

284646 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284646 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-06-23 21:32:00 +++$+++ 1.182659520E09 +++$+++ Please don't remove notability tags unless they are actually met. Episode articles are inherently not encyclopedic, so they need to prove themselves.  +++$+++ Please don't remove notability tags unless they are actually met. Episode articles are inherently not encyclopedic, so they need to prove themselves. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 21:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
284647 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284646 +++$+++ 284646 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 21:48:00 +++$+++ 1.182660480E09 +++$+++ I placed a discussion on the main article, so that should be good enough (unless you would like me to spam the season articles with it). A quick look at the articles shows no real world notability, so they fail it. There isn't much more to it. [[7:00AM-8:00AM (24 season 5)]] is the only decent one, but it is still lacking information that stabilizes an article.  +++$+++ :I placed a discussion on the main article, so that should be good enough (unless you would like me to spam the season articles with it). A quick look at the articles shows no real world notability, so they fail it. There isn't much more to it. [[7:00AM-8:00AM (24 season 5)]] is the only decent one, but it is still lacking information that stabilizes an article. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 21:48, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
284648 +++$+++ TTN +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284646 +++$+++ 284647 +++$+++ 2007-06-23 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.182666840E09 +++$+++ It's not threatening them or anything. They go up for \"review\" at that point to gain either a community type consensus if nobody bothered to respond or help people sort them out. It also rules out any \"no discussion\/no consensus\" complaints.  +++$+++ ::It's not threatening them or anything. They go up for "review" at that point to gain either a community type consensus if nobody bothered to respond or help people sort them out. It also rules out any "no discussion/no consensus" complaints. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 23:34, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
284649 +++$+++ DGG +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284646 +++$+++ 284647 +++$+++ 2007-06-27 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.182978900E09 +++$+++ Comment--happened to be here for something else--that while the principle of RS is not negotiable, the details most certainly are. The rule about primary sources is policy, not foundational principle, and can be changed by consensus--though I think it should remain as a general rule. The details of what it applies to are also changeable, and can be changed without removing the rule, and I think the application of it here is --well--debatable. ''' +++$+++ ::Comment--happened to be here for something else--that while the principle of RS is not negotiable, the details most certainly are. The rule about primary sources is policy, not foundational principle, and can be changed by consensus--though I think it should remain as a general rule. The details of what it applies to are also changeable, and can be changed without removing the rule, and I think the application of it here is --well--debatable. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' 14:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

22503 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22503 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-07-17 23:41:00 +++$+++ 1.216363260E09 +++$+++ You have been quiet recently? Been busy? \u2014  +++$+++ You have been quiet recently? Been busy? — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span><span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] ([[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#0f0">'''''Speak'''''</span>]]) 23:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
22504 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22503 +++$+++ 22503 +++$+++ 2008-07-18 00:41:00 +++$+++ 1.216366860E09 +++$+++ Ok, at least your still here. I replied at my page. Also, what you think of my new sig? \u2014  +++$+++ :Ok, at least your still here. I replied at my page. Also, what you think of my new sig? — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span><span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] ([[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#0f0">'''''Speak'''''</span>]]) 00:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

22506 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22506 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-14 17:38:00 +++$+++ 1.218760680E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Michael_Jackson#Tagging_Jackson_5_articles_into_the_MJ_project.3F Please comment here]. \u2014  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Michael_Jackson#Tagging_Jackson_5_articles_into_the_MJ_project.3F Please comment here]. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 17:38, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
22507 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22506 +++$+++ 22506 +++$+++ 2008-08-14 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.218769020E09 +++$+++ Thanx for responding, could you please keep the project on your watchlist for the next few weeks (you should have it watchlisted anyway), I will be adding more suggestions etc and asking for help. Everyone needs to keep up to date with the discussion, and further votes. \u2014  +++$+++ :Thanx for responding, could you please keep the project on your watchlist for the next few weeks (you should have it watchlisted anyway), I will be adding more suggestions etc and asking for help. Everyone needs to keep up to date with the discussion, and further votes. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 19:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

22508 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22508 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-15 04:52:00 +++$+++ 1.218801120E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Realist2\/sandbox2#J5_singles I made this template in my sandbox]. Its a collection of all their singles (that have articles). Can you check it, see if I've missed anything etc. When its good we can add it. Should we add singles that don't have articles? My knowledge of their singles history is poor. \u2014  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Realist2/sandbox2#J5_singles I made this template in my sandbox]. Its a collection of all their singles (that have articles). Can you check it, see if I've missed anything etc. When its good we can add it. Should we add singles that don't have articles? My knowledge of their singles history is poor. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 04:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
22509 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22508 +++$+++ 22508 +++$+++ 2008-08-15 04:59:00 +++$+++ 1.218801540E09 +++$+++ Obviously there is probably a lot more that can be added from this list. [[Jackson 5 discography]]. \u2014  +++$+++ :Obviously there is probably a lot more that can be added from this list. [[Jackson 5 discography]]. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 04:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
22510 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22508 +++$+++ 22509 +++$+++ 2008-08-15 05:43:00 +++$+++ 1.218804180E09 +++$+++ Sure, just work on it in my sandbox, no problem. \u2014  +++$+++ ::Sure, just work on it in my sandbox, no problem. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 05:43, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
22511 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22508 +++$+++ 22510 +++$+++ 2008-08-15 05:51:00 +++$+++ 1.218804660E09 +++$+++ Great!, if your sure it's complete I will start adding it later today (tired now). \u2014  +++$+++ :::Great!, if your sure it's complete I will start adding it later today (tired now). — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 05:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
22512 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22508 +++$+++ 22511 +++$+++ 2008-08-15 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.218805380E09 +++$+++ Sure, will add it to my to do list, I'm going to be very busy this next week mind you, with off wiki stuff. I will get around to it I promise. If you really want to start improving it before I get involved, I would advise you to set up a sandbox and start collecting together reliable web sources on him. Find the same kinds of sources that are used on the MJ article, Allmusic, Rolling Stone, BBC, CNN, The New York Times, TIME magazine, RIAA. Go out hunting for sources and save them somewhere. You might also want to buy some books if you don't have some already. \u2014  +++$+++ ::::Sure, will add it to my to do list, I'm going to be very busy this next week mind you, with off wiki stuff. I will get around to it I promise. If you really want to start improving it before I get involved, I would advise you to set up a sandbox and start collecting together reliable web sources on him. Find the same kinds of sources that are used on the MJ article, Allmusic, Rolling Stone, BBC, CNN, The New York Times, TIME magazine, RIAA. Go out hunting for sources and save them somewhere. You might also want to buy some books if you don't have some already. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 06:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
22513 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22508 +++$+++ 22512 +++$+++ 2008-08-15 08:02:00 +++$+++ 1.218812520E09 +++$+++ OK, i added the new template to everything. Thanx for help with that, I will get back to you about Marvin some time in a week. Try to get some info together. Cheers. \u2014  +++$+++ :::::OK, i added the new template to everything. Thanx for help with that, I will get back to you about Marvin some time in a week. Try to get some info together. Cheers. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 08:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

571730 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-01 23:35:00 +++$+++ 1.186036500E09 +++$+++ Hello Dfrg, and thank you for the cool pic and bar. I cannot, however, allow your death machine to be operational. By sticking this flag to your page, I hereby claim it for [[Portugal]]. Your death machine is now under Portuguese jurisdiction. It cannot be operational unless you fill 70 forms available in 70 different departments spread across the country, pay the respective fees, and wait until around the time the [[New Horizons]] probe reaches [[Pluto]] for approval. You may however drive your death machine on the highway just for fun. Speed limits are negligible around here. Cheers, <strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ Hello Dfrg, and thank you for the cool pic and bar. I cannot, however, allow your death machine to be operational. By sticking this flag to your page, I hereby claim it for [[Portugal]]. Your death machine is now under Portuguese jurisdiction. It cannot be operational unless you fill 70 forms available in 70 different departments spread across the country, pay the respective fees, and wait until around the time the [[New Horizons]] probe reaches [[Pluto]] for approval. You may however drive your death machine on the highway just for fun. Speed limits are negligible around here. Cheers, <strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 23:35, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
571731 +++$+++ Husond +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571730 +++$+++ 571730 +++$+++ 2007-08-01 23:36:00 +++$+++ 1.186036560E09 +++$+++ ps.- get well soon! :-) <strong><font style=\"color: #082567\">[[User:Husond|H\xfas]]<\/font> +++$+++ :ps.- get well soon! :-) <strong><font style="color: #082567">[[User:Husond|Hús]]</font>[[User:Husond/Esperanza|<font color="green">ö</font>]]<font style="color: #082567">[[User talk:Husond|nd]]</font></strong> 23:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
571732 +++$+++ DarkFalls +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571730 +++$+++ 571731 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 09:53:00 +++$+++ 1.186073580E09 +++$+++ Nooo... How could this happen! The machine is Australia's, and you better give it back Husond, before I make a ethnic war... And trust me, [[:Category:Portuguese Wikipedians|You don't stand a chance]] [[:Category:Australian Wikipedians|against us....]] -- +++$+++ ::Nooo... How could this happen! The machine is Australia's, and you better give it back Husond, before I make a ethnic war... And trust me, [[:Category:Portuguese Wikipedians|You don't stand a chance]] [[:Category:Australian Wikipedians|against us....]] --[[User:DarkFalls|<font color="black" face="Comic Sans Ms">Dark <font color="green">Falls</font></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:DarkFalls|talk]]</sup> 09:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
571733 +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571730 +++$+++ 571732 +++$+++ 2007-08-02 11:33:00 +++$+++ 1.186079580E09 +++$+++ Ok, I really do need to go, and I don't have much time to say everything that I'd like to - but I'm not going to have a full scale border war escalate over this (reminds me of my first marriage!). Anyway, I'll admit when I am bested by the white fleet and these soils are Portuguese now (could be [[France|worse]]). But my User page will stay Australian. A fair agreement? And an all other subpage can be calimed by other nations. I'll finish this when I get back. Love,  +++$+++ :::Ok, I really do need to go, and I don't have much time to say everything that I'd like to - but I'm not going to have a full scale border war escalate over this (reminds me of my first marriage!). Anyway, I'll admit when I am bested by the white fleet and these soils are Portuguese now (could be [[France|worse]]). But my User page will stay Australian. A fair agreement? And an all other subpage can be calimed by other nations. I'll finish this when I get back. Love, [[User:Dfrg.msc|Dfrg.]][[User talk:Dfrg.msc|msc]] 11:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

22514 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22514 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-08-18 07:30:00 +++$+++ 1.219069800E09 +++$+++ Do you know much about these two songs [[Do What You Do]] and [[Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin' (Too Good to Be True)]]. Were they both singles, were they a double A-side, was one a b-side. We are trying to figure out. Cheers. \u2014  +++$+++ Do you know much about these two songs [[Do What You Do]] and [[Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin' (Too Good to Be True)]]. Were they both singles, were they a double A-side, was one a b-side. We are trying to figure out. Cheers. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 07:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
22515 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22514 +++$+++ 22514 +++$+++ 2008-08-23 20:57:00 +++$+++ 1.219550220E09 +++$+++ OK, I can start helping you with the Marvin Gay article. First thing first, we need to get things sourced, that's something you can do just as easily as me. Do you know how to format web links like they are on the Michael Jackson or Thriller album articles? \u2014  +++$+++ :OK, I can start helping you with the Marvin Gay article. First thing first, we need to get things sourced, that's something you can do just as easily as me. Do you know how to format web links like they are on the Michael Jackson or Thriller album articles? — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 20:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
22516 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22514 +++$+++ 22515 +++$+++ 2008-08-23 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.219550340E09 +++$+++ I know how to reference several sites where I get information. Matter of fact, that's what I did while you were away, lol.  +++$+++ ::I know how to reference several sites where I get information. Matter of fact, that's what I did while you were away, lol. [[User:BrothaTimothy|BrothaTimothy]]&nbsp;([[User talk:BrothaTimothy|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/BrothaTimothy|contribs]]) 20:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
22517 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22514 +++$+++ 22516 +++$+++ 2008-08-23 21:12:00 +++$+++ 1.219551120E09 +++$+++ Replied at mine, keep discussion at mine, I hate those two way chats ;-) \u2014  +++$+++ :::Replied at mine, keep discussion at mine, I hate those two way chats ;-) — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 21:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

284659 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284659 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-07 22:27:00 +++$+++ 1.183872420E09 +++$+++ A range block can cause problems, as it will normally block very large numbers of wholly innocent editors. I have blocked the IP you quoted. --<font color=\"Red\"> +++$+++ A range block can cause problems, as it will normally block very large numbers of wholly innocent editors. I have blocked the IP you quoted. --<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony.bradbury|'''Anthony.bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 22:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
284660 +++$+++ Anthony.bradbury +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284659 +++$+++ 284659 +++$+++ 2007-07-07 23:14:00 +++$+++ 1.183875240E09 +++$+++ My personal view is, and has always been, that only account holders should be able to edit wikipedia. But this is not the consensus view; I have run it past the community more than once. As I indicated, I understand your problem; it is felt that we should not block some hundreds of innocent editors to remove one bad apple. I suppose this is right, though as you appreciate it can cause problems. Perhaps we must wait for improvements in the software, where I have no expertise. --<font color=\"Red\"> +++$+++ :My personal view is, and has always been, that only account holders should be able to edit wikipedia. But this is not the consensus view; I have run it past the community more than once. As I indicated, I understand your problem; it is felt that we should not block some hundreds of innocent editors to remove one bad apple. I suppose this is right, though as you appreciate it can cause problems. Perhaps we must wait for improvements in the software, where I have no expertise. --<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony.bradbury|'''Anthony.bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 23:14, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

284661 +++$+++ Phaedriel +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284661 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-07 23:47:00 +++$+++ 1.183877220E09 +++$+++ Dear Tvoz, please, don't worry, no apologies are needed - I understand your point perfectly, and in fact, I apologize if I sounded like you were doubting my good faith, because I know you didn't. I understand your point perfectly, and like I just commented at Sam's talk page, I even share your vies. Unfortunately, sometimes one has to make choices as an administrator that may collide with one's personal preferences, this being one of those cases. There's more I'd like to say to you, but I hope you forgive me right now (real life calls!) and besides, I'd rather save them for an email, for there are other thoughts I'd like to share with you. I hope you're having a beautiful weekend, and please, look at your mailbox tomorrow, please? Love,  +++$+++ Dear Tvoz, please, don't worry, no apologies are needed - I understand your point perfectly, and in fact, I apologize if I sounded like you were doubting my good faith, because I know you didn't. I understand your point perfectly, and like I just commented at Sam's talk page, I even share your vies. Unfortunately, sometimes one has to make choices as an administrator that may collide with one's personal preferences, this being one of those cases. There's more I'd like to say to you, but I hope you forgive me right now (real life calls!) and besides, I'd rather save them for an email, for there are other thoughts I'd like to share with you. I hope you're having a beautiful weekend, and please, look at your mailbox tomorrow, please? Love, [[User:Phaedriel|<b><font color="#009900">P<font color="#00AA00">h<font color="#00BB00">a<font color="#00CC00">e<font color="#00DD00">d</font>r</font>i</font>e</font>l</b>]] - 23:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
284662 +++$+++ Phaedriel +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284661 +++$+++ 284661 +++$+++ 2007-07-11 00:25:00 +++$+++ 1.184138700E09 +++$+++ You have mail! Sorry about the delay, dear... love,  +++$+++ :You have mail! Sorry about the delay, dear... love, [[User:Phaedriel|<b><font color="#009900">P<font color="#00AA00">h<font color="#00BB00">a<font color="#00CC00">e<font color="#00DD00">d</font>r</font>i</font>e</font>l</b>]] - 00:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

546807 +++$+++ Trixt +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546807 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-20 11:21:00 +++$+++ 1.250792460E09 +++$+++ Hi. Could you please take a look at [[:File:Vega vena kava.jpg]] and [[:File:Whipkraft2.jpg]]? I think that they can be speedy deleted as blatant copyvio. Thank you in advance-- +++$+++ Hi. Could you please take a look at [[:File:Vega vena kava.jpg]] and [[:File:Whipkraft2.jpg]]? I think that they can be speedy deleted as blatant copyvio. Thank you in advance--[[User:Trixt|Trixt]] ([[User talk:Trixt|talk]]) 11:21, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
546808 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546807 +++$+++ 546807 +++$+++ 2009-08-20 13:42:00 +++$+++ 1.250800920E09 +++$+++ Hi, Trixt. Off-hand, I am hesitant to call either photo a blatant copyright violation. Although [http:\/\/www.whipkraft.com\/web-gallery\/pages\/3-goth-girl-5.htm this photo] appears on their website, there is an assertion that the contributor owns the original rights to the photo. He asserts the same thing on the other photo, which I can't find outside of WP. However, I must say that I am not very familiar with copyright issues for images. I would recommend that you list your concerns at [[WP:PUI]] where the editors are much more knowledgeable about photos. Sorry that I couldn't be of more help to you. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Hi, Trixt. Off-hand, I am hesitant to call either photo a blatant copyright violation. Although [http://www.whipkraft.com/web-gallery/pages/3-goth-girl-5.htm this photo] appears on their website, there is an assertion that the contributor owns the original rights to the photo. He asserts the same thing on the other photo, which I can't find outside of WP. However, I must say that I am not very familiar with copyright issues for images. I would recommend that you list your concerns at [[WP:PUI]] where the editors are much more knowledgeable about photos. Sorry that I couldn't be of more help to you. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 13:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
546809 +++$+++ Trixt +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546807 +++$+++ 546808 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 10:14:00 +++$+++ 1.250874840E09 +++$+++ {{tick|18}} '''{{ucfirst:done}}'''-- +++$+++ :: {{tick|18}} '''{{ucfirst:done}}'''--[[User:Trixt|Trixt]] ([[User talk:Trixt|talk]]) 10:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

47444 +++$+++ Philcha +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47444 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-28 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.230530460E09 +++$+++ Hi,Krakatoa. Does any of your books say exactly when Em. Lasker and his wife left Germany in 1933, and exactly when their property was confiscated. Is' come up at [[Talk:Emanuel Lasker\/GA1]]. -- +++$+++ Hi,Krakatoa. Does any of your books say exactly when Em. Lasker and his wife left Germany in 1933, and exactly when their property was confiscated. Is' come up at [[Talk:Emanuel Lasker/GA1]]. --[[User:Philcha|Philcha]] ([[User talk:Philcha|talk]]) 22:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
47445 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47444 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2008-12-29 00:55:00 +++$+++ 1.230540900E09 +++$+++ Other books are even less enlightening, including Soltis' ''Why Lasker Matters''; Whyld's trilogy on Lasker's games published by ''The Chess Player''; Fine and Reinfeld's ''Lasker's Greatest Chess Games 1889-1914'' (no follow-up volume was published); Egon Varnusz, ''Emanuel Lasker, Volume 1'' (I don't know if there was a Volume 2); and ''Golombek's Encyclopedia of Chess''. Sorry I can't be more helpful.  +++$+++ ::Other books are even less enlightening, including Soltis' ''Why Lasker Matters''; Whyld's trilogy on Lasker's games published by ''The Chess Player''; Fine and Reinfeld's ''Lasker's Greatest Chess Games 1889-1914'' (no follow-up volume was published); Egon Varnusz, ''Emanuel Lasker, Volume 1'' (I don't know if there was a Volume 2); and ''Golombek's Encyclopedia of Chess''. Sorry I can't be more helpful. [[User:Krakatoa|Krakatoa]] ([[User talk:Krakatoa#top|talk]]) 00:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

546811 +++$+++ Ademmen +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-21 06:42:00 +++$+++ 1.250862120E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Ademmen|Ademmen]] ([[User talk:Ademmen|talk]]) 06:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546812 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546811 +++$+++ 546811 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 08:28:00 +++$+++ 1.250868480E09 +++$+++ As I am sure you can appreciate, WP takes the problem of copyright violation very seriously. The thorough checking of all articles submitted to the encyclopedia is deemed necessary. This protects not only Wikipedia, but also all the hard work of people who are creating the publications and websites which are sourced here. With thousands of new pages submitted to WP every day, it takes time for the volunteer staff to process it all. I know that it's certainly frustrating at times. But it is important that it be done. And it often requires a little extra patience on all our parts. I hope this answers your questions. Cheers. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :As I am sure you can appreciate, WP takes the problem of copyright violation very seriously. The thorough checking of all articles submitted to the encyclopedia is deemed necessary. This protects not only Wikipedia, but also all the hard work of people who are creating the publications and websites which are sourced here. With thousands of new pages submitted to WP every day, it takes time for the volunteer staff to process it all. I know that it's certainly frustrating at times. But it is important that it be done. And it often requires a little extra patience on all our parts. I hope this answers your questions. Cheers. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 08:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546813 +++$+++ Ademmen +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546811 +++$+++ 546812 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 11:15:00 +++$+++ 1.250878500E09 +++$+++ Of course I agree with you it is important to respect all the copyrights. I am looking for a way to prevent  a lot of, I think needless, work by many people. Just trying to help to make the process a bit more efficient.  +++$+++ ::Of course I agree with you it is important to respect all the copyrights. I am looking for a way to prevent  a lot of, I think needless, work by many people. Just trying to help to make the process a bit more efficient. [[User:Ademmen|Ademmen]] ([[User talk:Ademmen|talk]]) 11:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546814 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546811 +++$+++ 546813 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.250890020E09 +++$+++ <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::<span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546815 +++$+++ MLauba +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546811 +++$+++ 546813 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.250890800E09 +++$+++ Short and to the point, there are two ways to speed up the process: either release the source material under CC-BY-SA 3.0 and never worry about it again, or send the permission mail to OTRS proactively right when you post the article, and immediately note that you have done so on the new article's talk page.  +++$+++ :::Short and to the point, there are two ways to speed up the process: either release the source material under CC-BY-SA 3.0 and never worry about it again, or send the permission mail to OTRS proactively right when you post the article, and immediately note that you have done so on the new article's talk page. [[User:MLauba|MLauba]] ([[User talk:MLauba|talk]]) 14:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546816 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546811 +++$+++ 546815 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 14:50:00 +++$+++ 1.250891400E09 +++$+++ Yeah, nice suggestion -- but then they wouldn't get to read all my whine and blather. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::::Yeah, nice suggestion -- but then they wouldn't get to read all my whine and blather. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546817 +++$+++ MLauba +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546811 +++$+++ 546816 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.250892840E09 +++$+++ True. A net loss, undoubtedly. Or worse, my dry and patronizing prose if it was CSB who picked the violation.  +++$+++ :::::True. A net loss, undoubtedly. Or worse, my dry and patronizing prose if it was CSB who picked the violation. [[User:MLauba|MLauba]] ([[User talk:MLauba|talk]]) 15:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

22525 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22525 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-11-22 22:25:00 +++$+++ 1.227421500E09 +++$+++ Have you heard about the Jackson's documentary about them Going to [[Devon]] in the UK. It's going to air on British TV soon and there are sources reporting on it, it's been getting some good reviews. Maybe you would like to start an article on it since I know you like starting new articles. Also, are you aware of [[User:BrothaTimothy\/Sig|this]]? \u2014  +++$+++ Have you heard about the Jackson's documentary about them Going to [[Devon]] in the UK. It's going to air on British TV soon and there are sources reporting on it, it's been getting some good reviews. Maybe you would like to start an article on it since I know you like starting new articles. Also, are you aware of [[User:BrothaTimothy/Sig|this]]? — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 22:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
22526 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22525 +++$+++ 22525 +++$+++ 2008-11-22 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.227426180E09 +++$+++ Oh don't worry about that lawsuit, it will fade from public consciousness soon enough. It won't change anything, those people who like him will continue to like him, those who hate him will continue to hate him. I just wish people would look after the guy, he's clearly a vulnerable individual. \u2014  +++$+++ :Oh don't worry about that lawsuit, it will fade from public consciousness soon enough. It won't change anything, those people who like him will continue to like him, those who hate him will continue to hate him. I just wish people would look after the guy, he's clearly a vulnerable individual. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 23:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
22527 +++$+++ Realist2 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22525 +++$+++ 22526 +++$+++ 2008-11-28 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.227923760E09 +++$+++ Well that court case aint going ahead no more, I'm happy. \u2014  +++$+++ ::Well that court case aint going ahead no more, I'm happy. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 17:56, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

353280 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Zginder +++$+++ 353280 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-28 23:52:00 +++$+++ 1.204271520E09 +++$+++ You said we needed two more articles for each topic, but each has four featured articles, and 20% of 26 (rounded down) is 5, so we only need one more article for each topic. --  +++$+++ You said we needed two more articles for each topic, but each has four featured articles, and 20% of 26 (rounded down) is 5, so we only need one more article for each topic. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 23:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
353281 +++$+++ Scorpion0422 +++$+++ Zginder +++$+++ 353280 +++$+++ 353280 +++$+++ 2008-02-29 00:43:00 +++$+++ 1.204274580E09 +++$+++ Yes, but it doesn't specify that you have to round up. In fact, in the discussion, you yourself specifically said that it's 20% rounded down. 20% of 26 = 5.2. Rounded down, that's 5. --  +++$+++ :Yes, but it doesn't specify that you have to round up. In fact, in the discussion, you yourself specifically said that it's 20% rounded down. 20% of 26 = 5.2. Rounded down, that's 5. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 00:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

546819 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546819 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-21 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.250909520E09 +++$+++ Hello CactusWriter. Is the OTRS template on [[Talk:J. John Mann]] correct? It was added by the author of the article. ''''' +++$+++ Hello CactusWriter. Is the OTRS template on [[Talk:J. John Mann]] correct? It was added by the author of the article. '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 19:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546820 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546819 +++$+++ 546819 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 19:57:00 +++$+++ 1.250909820E09 +++$+++ Also, can [http:\/\/7thspace.com\/headlines\/311079\/secretary_general_appoints_sahle_work_zewde_of_ethiopia_as_special_representative_head_of_peacebuilding_office_in_central_african_republic.html this] be used on Wikipedia? \"Limited copyright is granted for you to use and\/or republish any story on this site for any legitimate media purpose as long as you reference 7thSpace and any source mentioned in the story above.\" ''''' +++$+++ :Also, can [http://7thspace.com/headlines/311079/secretary_general_appoints_sahle_work_zewde_of_ethiopia_as_special_representative_head_of_peacebuilding_office_in_central_african_republic.html this] be used on Wikipedia? "Limited copyright is granted for you to use and/or republish any story on this site for any legitimate media purpose as long as you reference 7thSpace and any source mentioned in the story above." '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 19:57, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546821 +++$+++ MLauba +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546819 +++$+++ 546820 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 20:01:00 +++$+++ 1.250910060E09 +++$+++ I asked the same question to [[User:Stifle]], I suddenly completely forgot that CactusWriter is OTRS too :). To answer the second question, no, it allows reuse, but not derivatives, that's incompatible with copyleft in general.  +++$+++ :: I asked the same question to [[User:Stifle]], I suddenly completely forgot that CactusWriter is OTRS too :). To answer the second question, no, it allows reuse, but not derivatives, that's incompatible with copyleft in general. [[User:MLauba|MLauba]] ([[User talk:MLauba|talk]]) 20:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546822 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546819 +++$+++ 546821 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 20:13:00 +++$+++ 1.250910780E09 +++$+++ No, sorry, I am not a member of OTRS. You should definitely ask someone there first -- Stifle is a good choice. It appears the contributor is adding the same ticket to a dozen pages he has created about doctors. I am assuming it will show permission to use info from [[http:\/\/www.nyspi.org\/ New York State Psychiatric Institute]] website. We will need to know how specific the ticket is. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::No, sorry, I am not a member of OTRS. You should definitely ask someone there first -- Stifle is a good choice. It appears the contributor is adding the same ticket to a dozen pages he has created about doctors. I am assuming it will show permission to use info from [[http://www.nyspi.org/ New York State Psychiatric Institute]] website. We will need to know how specific the ticket is. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 20:13, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546823 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546819 +++$+++ 546821 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.250912280E09 +++$+++ Just got word on the OTRS ticket from Keegan -- it all checks out correctly for that editor. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Just got word on the OTRS ticket from Keegan -- it all checks out correctly for that editor. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 20:38, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
546824 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546819 +++$+++ 546823 +++$+++ 2009-08-21 20:40:00 +++$+++ 1.250912400E09 +++$+++ Alright, thanks. I'll remove it from WP:SCV. ''''' +++$+++ ::::Alright, thanks. I'll remove it from WP:SCV. '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 20:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

284676 +++$+++ Hamster Sandwich +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284676 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-15 23:25:00 +++$+++ 1.184567100E09 +++$+++ Do you have a link you could provide for results from the board election? I have not been able to find anything handy. Best regards,  +++$+++ Do you have a link you could provide for results from the board election? I have not been able to find anything handy. Best regards, [[User:Hamster Sandwich|Hamster Sandwich]] 23:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
284677 +++$+++ Hamster Sandwich +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284676 +++$+++ 284676 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.184567520E09 +++$+++ TY very much! I appreciate the direction fully and completely. Carry on, noble Wikipedian! Best regards,  +++$+++ :TY very much! I appreciate the direction fully and completely. Carry on, noble Wikipedian! Best regards, [[User:Hamster Sandwich|Hamster Sandwich]] 23:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
284678 +++$+++ Hamster Sandwich +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284676 +++$+++ 284677 +++$+++ 2007-07-15 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.184567880E09 +++$+++ They took away my cowbell so I thought the page needed a bit of \"Dick\". I am a bad, bad person... Thanks again!  +++$+++ ::They took away my cowbell so I thought the page needed a bit of "Dick". I am a bad, bad person... Thanks again! [[User:Hamster Sandwich|Hamster Sandwich]] 23:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

47446 +++$+++ Stefan64 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47446 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-01-01 19:26:00 +++$+++ 1.230866760E09 +++$+++ Hi Krakatoa, congratulations for your excellent work on George Gossip. As the author of the (modest) [[:de:George Gossip|German article]] about him, I would like to ask whether you could upload the images on [[Wikimedia Commons]]. This would make it easier to use them in sister projects. Thanks and all the best for 2009,  +++$+++ Hi Krakatoa, congratulations for your excellent work on George Gossip. As the author of the (modest) [[:de:George Gossip|German article]] about him, I would like to ask whether you could upload the images on [[Wikimedia Commons]]. This would make it easier to use them in sister projects. Thanks and all the best for 2009, [[User:Stefan64|Stefan64]] ([[User talk:Stefan64|talk]]) 19:26, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
47447 +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ Krakatoa +++$+++ 47446 +++$+++ 47446 +++$+++ 2009-01-06 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.231258980E09 +++$+++ Hi, Stefan64, glad you like the article. As per your request, I copied the four images in the article (two pictures of Gossip, and two of his books) and uploaded them all on Wikimedia Commons. Have fun with them. By the way, the (English) Gossip article is a [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates\/George_H.D._Gossip|Featured Article candidate]], so feel free to drop by and express your opinion if you so desire. Thanks!  +++$+++ :Hi, Stefan64, glad you like the article. As per your request, I copied the four images in the article (two pictures of Gossip, and two of his books) and uploaded them all on Wikimedia Commons. Have fun with them. By the way, the (English) Gossip article is a [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/George_H.D._Gossip|Featured Article candidate]], so feel free to drop by and express your opinion if you so desire. Thanks! [[User:Krakatoa|Krakatoa]] ([[User talk:Krakatoa#top|talk]]) 08:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

284680 +++$+++ Osbojos +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284680 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-16 20:25:00 +++$+++ 1.184642700E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ --[[User:Osbojos|Osbojos]] 20:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
284681 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284680 +++$+++ 284680 +++$+++ 2007-07-16 22:32:00 +++$+++ 1.184650320E09 +++$+++ Discussion is underway on [[User Talk:Osbojos]] - if any of my faithful readers are interested in weighing in with opinions and advice, that would be helpful.  I think the problem extends beyond Categories, and  this deletion frenzy is doing damage to the overall project, so I changed the header of this section here and would very much like wider input on this over on Osbojos' talk page for starters. <strong> +++$+++ :Discussion is underway on [[User Talk:Osbojos]] - if any of my faithful readers are interested in weighing in with opinions and advice, that would be helpful.  I think the problem extends beyond Categories, and  this deletion frenzy is doing damage to the overall project, so I changed the header of this section here and would very much like wider input on this over on Osbojos' talk page for starters. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 22:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
284682 +++$+++ Cgingold +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284680 +++$+++ 284680 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 01:20:00 +++$+++ 1.184746800E09 +++$+++ Meanwhile, I've just finished posting a long comment at [[:Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2007_July_11#Category:Irish-American_singers]], which really needs more input as it's going heavily in the wrong (IMHO) direction, too. It won't stay open very much longer, so if you want to get your \"two cents\" in, time is of the essence...  +++$+++ :Meanwhile, I've just finished posting a long comment at [[:Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_July_11#Category:Irish-American_singers]], which really needs more input as it's going heavily in the wrong (IMHO) direction, too. It won't stay open very much longer, so if you want to get your "two cents" in, time is of the essence... [[User:Cgingold|Cgingold]] 01:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
284683 +++$+++ Cgingold +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284680 +++$+++ 284682 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 05:00:00 +++$+++ 1.184760000E09 +++$+++ Just saw your wonderful elaborations of\/on my comments over at [[:Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion\/Log\/2007_July_11#Category:Irish-American_singers]]! All I can say is, if our arguments don't carry the day then the whole CFD process needs to be turned inside out. Seriously. But I'm still hoping for a better outcome this time.  +++$+++ ::Just saw your wonderful elaborations of/on my comments over at [[:Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_July_11#Category:Irish-American_singers]]! All I can say is, if our arguments don't carry the day then the whole CFD process needs to be turned inside out. Seriously. But I'm still hoping for a better outcome this time. [[User:Cgingold|Cgingold]] 05:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

546825 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546825 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-22 10:28:00 +++$+++ 1.250962080E09 +++$+++ The creator of this article needs help -- I deleted his first version as it was almost all copyvio, then, after he insulted me a couple of times, felt pity on him and reinstated the article with a couple of sentences. He was pretty clear that he had copied the stuff and said he was 'rewriting' it, but it was still going to be copyvio no matter what he did given how much he'd copied straight from one particular writer. He's now gone back to copy and paste from the web (his own writing is pretty bad by the way, any time you see good English from him....). I've been discussing it as has one other editor, but as we are both editors who would have been watching an article like this carefully anyway due to its content, a 3rd party comment to him might help him if in fact he can grasp the problem (and I'm not sure he can, he seems to think just re-arranging some words is enough). Thanks  +++$+++ The creator of this article needs help -- I deleted his first version as it was almost all copyvio, then, after he insulted me a couple of times, felt pity on him and reinstated the article with a couple of sentences. He was pretty clear that he had copied the stuff and said he was 'rewriting' it, but it was still going to be copyvio no matter what he did given how much he'd copied straight from one particular writer. He's now gone back to copy and paste from the web (his own writing is pretty bad by the way, any time you see good English from him....). I've been discussing it as has one other editor, but as we are both editors who would have been watching an article like this carefully anyway due to its content, a 3rd party comment to him might help him if in fact he can grasp the problem (and I'm not sure he can, he seems to think just re-arranging some words is enough). Thanks [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 10:28, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
546826 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546825 +++$+++ 546825 +++$+++ 2009-08-22 13:49:00 +++$+++ 1.250974140E09 +++$+++ Oh, my. That is a rough one. Seems to be a lot of misplaced \"passion\" on that editor's part. I'll try to lend another neutral voice. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Oh, my. That is a rough one. Seems to be a lot of misplaced "passion" on that editor's part. I'll try to lend another neutral voice. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 13:49, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
546827 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546825 +++$+++ 546826 +++$+++ 2009-08-22 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.250976840E09 +++$+++ Many thanks, that was a very good reply you made. I'm not optimistic, but we should try to keep an editor who is at least keen. Hopefully other editors will add to the article anyway.  +++$+++ ::Many thanks, that was a very good reply you made. I'm not optimistic, but we should try to keep an editor who is at least keen. Hopefully other editors will add to the article anyway. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 14:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
546828 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546825 +++$+++ 546827 +++$+++ 2009-08-22 14:40:00 +++$+++ 1.250977200E09 +++$+++ Agreed. A good thought. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Agreed. A good thought. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:40, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

284684 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284684 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-17 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.184719860E09 +++$+++ Hiya Tvoz! Another user has reverted my change. Mark is on the missing list, what should I do please? I put a note on the talk page, but said user has not responded. Cheers Queen. +++$+++ Hiya Tvoz! Another user has reverted my change. Mark is on the missing list, what should I do please? I put a note on the talk page, but said user has not responded. Cheers Queen.[[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 17:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
284685 +++$+++ Vera, Chuck & Dave +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284684 +++$+++ 284684 +++$+++ 2007-07-18 00:00:00 +++$+++ 1.184742000E09 +++$+++ God! Wha' an 'andle eh? Makes yer wonder if the auld feller has a sense of humour, or is as mad as a mongoose! Ta very much for yer help Queen. X0X  +++$+++ :God! Wha' an 'andle eh? Makes yer wonder if the auld feller has a sense of humour, or is as mad as a mongoose! Ta very much for yer help Queen. X0X [[User:Vera, Chuck & Dave|Vera, Chuck &amp; Dave]] 00:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

546829 +++$+++ Arab Cowboy +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546829 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-23 10:03:00 +++$+++ 1.251046980E09 +++$+++ Regards, -- +++$+++ Regards, --[[User:Arab Cowboy|Arab Cowboy]] ([[User talk:Arab Cowboy|talk]]) 10:03, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
546830 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546829 +++$+++ 546829 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 11:00:00 +++$+++ 1.251050400E09 +++$+++ Hi, Arab Cowboy. You can find my reasons posted on August 18 on the article's talk page under \"Plagiarism issues\". A lengthy discussion with explanations followed. Please read [[Talk:Asmahan]]and feel free to respond there. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Hi, Arab Cowboy. You can find my reasons posted on August 18 on the article's talk page under "Plagiarism issues". A lengthy discussion with explanations followed. Please read [[Talk:Asmahan]]and feel free to respond there. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 11:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
546831 +++$+++ Arab Cowboy +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546829 +++$+++ 546830 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 11:06:00 +++$+++ 1.251050760E09 +++$+++ Hello Cactus:  Thank you for your reply. I had already read the discussion.  The issue is that the whole article is written in the same way.  SD had alerted you only to sentences that do not suit his agenda, but if you apply the same standards to the whole article, then it should all be tagged or deleted.  Tagging just the one section and removing statements that SD does not like is selective.  So, what do you suggest.  -- +++$+++ ::Hello Cactus:  Thank you for your reply. I had already read the discussion.  The issue is that the whole article is written in the same way.  SD had alerted you only to sentences that do not suit his agenda, but if you apply the same standards to the whole article, then it should all be tagged or deleted.  Tagging just the one section and removing statements that SD does not like is selective.  So, what do you suggest.  --[[User:Arab Cowboy|Arab Cowboy]] ([[User talk:Arab Cowboy|talk]]) 11:06, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
546832 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546829 +++$+++ 546831 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 11:47:00 +++$+++ 1.251053220E09 +++$+++ I have moved your comment to article talk page and responded there. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::I have moved your comment to article talk page and responded there. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 11:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

284688 +++$+++ SOPHIA +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-22 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.185119580E09 +++$+++ I have 3 daughters - one has a Welsh name, one an Indian and the other Greek so no it isn't obvious. You need to self revert as to say she is Bill and Fleur's daughter is OR as there is nothing in the book to confirm that.  +++$+++ I have 3 daughters - one has a Welsh name, one an Indian and the other Greek so no it isn't obvious. You need to self revert as to say she is Bill and Fleur's daughter is OR as there is nothing in the book to confirm that. [[User:SOPHIA| <font color = "purple">'''Sophia'''</font>]] 08:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
284689 +++$+++ SOPHIA +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284688 +++$+++ 284688 +++$+++ 2007-07-22 09:09:00 +++$+++ 1.185120540E09 +++$+++ I chose to contact you rather than edit war. If everyone adds something to an article on a book of fiction that is \"obvious\" to them this article will not stand a chance. How will you decide what to leave or add? It may seem nitpicking but it's how you kill the fancruft and rubbish in the article in the long run. I normally edit in other spheres so an quite taken aback at how casual the standards seem to be.  +++$+++ :I chose to contact you rather than edit war. If everyone adds something to an article on a book of fiction that is "obvious" to them this article will not stand a chance. How will you decide what to leave or add? It may seem nitpicking but it's how you kill the fancruft and rubbish in the article in the long run. I normally edit in other spheres so an quite taken aback at how casual the standards seem to be. [[User:SOPHIA| <font color = "purple">'''Sophia'''</font>]] 09:09, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

546833 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546833 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-23 10:11:00 +++$+++ 1.251047460E09 +++$+++ Maybe I shouldn't get involved in dealing with copyright violations, esp. image ones.  A while back I blocked {{user|Bottracker}}, who I blocked for copyright violations and personal attacks but mainly to get him to enter into a dialogue which he was refusing to do, just deleting all the notices. 2 other Admins declined an unblock request, a 3rd blocked his user page and mentioned that his username was problematic, and now he's been unblocked and given a 'sincere apology' and advised that his block wasn't justified.  The discussion (which I think should be on ANI) is [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Check_the_facts_first.2C_Bottracker.27s_original_block_had_nothing_to_do_with_his_username here]. This came to the unblocking Admin's attention because the 3rd Admin, who locked his talk page,  had blocked several people for username problems, although this was not a factor in my original block. Sure, I could have tried to get him to stop deleting warnings and discuss, but that seemed very unlikely unless it was made clear to him that he couldn't just continue to delete warnings. My own take on indef blocks is that they can be lifted and should be lifted at any time, even within minutes, once the user shows a desire to understand the reasons and change their behavior. I don't know if you feel you have the time or inclination to comment, but I feel the blocked editor has now been told his behavior was acceptable. Thanks.  +++$+++ Maybe I shouldn't get involved in dealing with copyright violations, esp. image ones.  A while back I blocked {{user|Bottracker}}, who I blocked for copyright violations and personal attacks but mainly to get him to enter into a dialogue which he was refusing to do, just deleting all the notices. 2 other Admins declined an unblock request, a 3rd blocked his user page and mentioned that his username was problematic, and now he's been unblocked and given a 'sincere apology' and advised that his block wasn't justified.  The discussion (which I think should be on ANI) is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Check_the_facts_first.2C_Bottracker.27s_original_block_had_nothing_to_do_with_his_username here]. This came to the unblocking Admin's attention because the 3rd Admin, who locked his talk page,  had blocked several people for username problems, although this was not a factor in my original block. Sure, I could have tried to get him to stop deleting warnings and discuss, but that seemed very unlikely unless it was made clear to him that he couldn't just continue to delete warnings. My own take on indef blocks is that they can be lifted and should be lifted at any time, even within minutes, once the user shows a desire to understand the reasons and change their behavior. I don't know if you feel you have the time or inclination to comment, but I feel the blocked editor has now been told his behavior was acceptable. Thanks. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 10:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
546834 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546833 +++$+++ 546833 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 15:57:00 +++$+++ 1.251068220E09 +++$+++ Doug, sorry, I was reading through the diffs on this when I got waylayed by a big edit war. \"Sigh\" is right. There are good days, and there are bad ones. The block was absolutely understandable -- a runaway editor uploading dozens of pictures without regard for warnings. Only taking time to rant against another editor as well as telling an editor who left a personal message about the CV problem to essentially go away. Yeah, the block was needed. The unblock doesn't bother me, but the message is absurd. It should certainly have come with a small caveat about Copyright and Civility. I am inclined to comment. Let me think about it. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Doug, sorry, I was reading through the diffs on this when I got waylayed by a big edit war. "Sigh" is right. There are good days, and there are bad ones. The block was absolutely understandable -- a runaway editor uploading dozens of pictures without regard for warnings. Only taking time to rant against another editor as well as telling an editor who left a personal message about the CV problem to essentially go away. Yeah, the block was needed. The unblock doesn't bother me, but the message is absurd. It should certainly have come with a small caveat about Copyright and Civility. I am inclined to comment. Let me think about it. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 15:57, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

96770 +++$+++ Nabil rais2008 +++$+++ Farjad0322 +++$+++ 96770 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-16 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.284692820E09 +++$+++ I am currently concentrating on \"Major Rivers in Pakistan\". I have commented on this article's discussion page, the article needs some references. The article should be renamed to \"Rivers in Pakistan\".  +++$+++ I am currently concentrating on "Major Rivers in Pakistan". I have commented on this article's discussion page, the article needs some references. The article should be renamed to "Rivers in Pakistan". [[User:Nabil rais2008|Nabil rais2008]] ([[User talk:Nabil rais2008|talk]]) 20:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
96771 +++$+++ Nabil rais2008 +++$+++ Farjad0322 +++$+++ 96770 +++$+++ 96770 +++$+++ 2010-09-16 20:24:00 +++$+++ 1.284693840E09 +++$+++ In this case the article will be deleted, and we can merge this article with the new section as you said.  +++$+++ :In this case the article will be deleted, and we can merge this article with the new section as you said. [[User:Nabil rais2008|Nabil rais2008]] ([[User talk:Nabil rais2008|talk]]) 20:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
96772 +++$+++ Nabil rais2008 +++$+++ Farjad0322 +++$+++ 96770 +++$+++ 96771 +++$+++ 2010-09-16 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.284694920E09 +++$+++ Ok the redirect is the best solution for this article. But it needs some references to put along this content to the new section in the article \"Geography of Pakistan\".  +++$+++ ::Ok the redirect is the best solution for this article. But it needs some references to put along this content to the new section in the article "Geography of Pakistan". [[User:Nabil rais2008|Nabil rais2008]] ([[User talk:Nabil rais2008|talk]]) 20:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
96773 +++$+++ Nabil rais2008 +++$+++ Farjad0322 +++$+++ 96770 +++$+++ 96772 +++$+++ 2010-09-16 20:49:00 +++$+++ 1.284695340E09 +++$+++ Ok  +++$+++ :::Ok [[User:Nabil rais2008|Nabil rais2008]] ([[User talk:Nabil rais2008|talk]]) 20:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

546835 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546835 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-23 13:55:00 +++$+++ 1.251060900E09 +++$+++ User Arab Cowboy have blanked the whole Asmahan article although I have told him repeatedly that the first part of the early life section is not plagiarism, there was one sentence there that you commented on and I changed it to your suggestion, and thats it. -- +++$+++ User Arab Cowboy have blanked the whole Asmahan article although I have told him repeatedly that the first part of the early life section is not plagiarism, there was one sentence there that you commented on and I changed it to your suggestion, and thats it. --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 13:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
546836 +++$+++ Arab Cowboy +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546835 +++$+++ 546835 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 14:08:00 +++$+++ 1.251061680E09 +++$+++ As I stated on the Talk page of the article, I demand a review of the whole article.  Do not blank one section in deference of the others.  Until that happens, the whole article should be blanked, not just one section of it.  Plagiarism standards should apply equivocally to all sentences in the article.  -- +++$+++ :As I stated on the Talk page of the article, I demand a review of the whole article.  Do not blank one section in deference of the others.  Until that happens, the whole article should be blanked, not just one section of it.  Plagiarism standards should apply equivocally to all sentences in the article.  --[[User:Arab Cowboy|Arab Cowboy]] ([[User talk:Arab Cowboy|talk]]) 14:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
546837 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546835 +++$+++ 546836 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 14:28:00 +++$+++ 1.251062880E09 +++$+++ Let me have a minute to take a look. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::Let me have a minute to take a look. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
546838 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546835 +++$+++ 546836 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 15:14:00 +++$+++ 1.251065640E09 +++$+++ I have blocked Arab Cowboy for persistent edit warring. Supreme Deliciousness, I came close to blocking you as well, but I took into account you fell one edit short of 3RR, used the discussion page and finally sought advice. I have written another review of the article on the talk page with my suggestions to remove the copyright violations. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::I have blocked Arab Cowboy for persistent edit warring. Supreme Deliciousness, I came close to blocking you as well, but I took into account you fell one edit short of 3RR, used the discussion page and finally sought advice. I have written another review of the article on the talk page with my suggestions to remove the copyright violations. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 15:14, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

22549 +++$+++ TenPoundHammer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22549 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-18 01:39:00 +++$+++ 1.245314340E09 +++$+++ I noticed you added your signature and nothing else. Slip of the fingers? <span style=\"color:green\">Ten Pound Hammer<\/span>, his otters and a clue-bat \u2022 <sup>([[Special:Contributions\/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] \u2022 [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] \u2022  +++$+++ I noticed you added your signature and nothing else. Slip of the fingers? <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 01:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
22550 +++$+++ TenPoundHammer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22549 +++$+++ 22549 +++$+++ 2009-06-18 03:38:00 +++$+++ 1.245321480E09 +++$+++ Oh, I see, you re-named it yourself. I've tagged the old category for speedy deletion per criterion G7. <span style=\"color:green\">Ten Pound Hammer<\/span>, his otters and a clue-bat \u2022 <sup>([[Special:Contributions\/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] \u2022 [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] \u2022  +++$+++ *Oh, I see, you re-named it yourself. I've tagged the old category for speedy deletion per criterion G7. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 03:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

284694 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284694 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-07-26 09:52:00 +++$+++ 1.185468720E09 +++$+++ I think if you want to add the altered photo you need to have some sourced explanation of its significance. It is not self-evident. <strong> +++$+++ I think if you want to add the altered photo you need to have some sourced explanation of its significance. It is not self-evident. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 09:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
284695 +++$+++ AperfectHell +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284694 +++$+++ 284694 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.185484320E09 +++$+++ What do you mean?  Like in the actual article or the image page?  Do I need more sources?  Or Do I need to explain the missing fence pole? --  +++$+++ :What do you mean?  Like in the actual article or the image page?  Do I need more sources?  Or Do I need to explain the missing fence pole? -- [[User:AperfectHell|AperfectHell]] 14:12, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
284696 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284694 +++$+++ 284695 +++$+++ 2007-07-26 16:29:00 +++$+++ 1.185492540E09 +++$+++ I mean that I think you need to have sources who confirm that the the altered photo was used and mostly sources that talk about why this is significant - on its own, just the pictures don't give enough information. And you need reliable, verifiable sources - articles written about it if there are any - that explain why this is a significant point, what the missing pole suggests, etc - not your opinion (even if it is valid) - but what independent, reliable sources have said about its significance. Otherwise it's original research or it's just a doctored photo with no context and therefore no notability.  I'm not saying whether it  should be in the article - anything that sheds light on Kent State and informs people about it in a balanced and thorough way should be there in my opinion  -  but I am saying that it needs to have a well-sourced explanation. <strong> +++$+++ ::I mean that I think you need to have sources who confirm that the the altered photo was used and mostly sources that talk about why this is significant - on its own, just the pictures don't give enough information. And you need reliable, verifiable sources - articles written about it if there are any - that explain why this is a significant point, what the missing pole suggests, etc - not your opinion (even if it is valid) - but what independent, reliable sources have said about its significance. Otherwise it's original research or it's just a doctored photo with no context and therefore no notability.  I'm not saying whether it  should be in the article - anything that sheds light on Kent State and informs people about it in a balanced and thorough way should be there in my opinion  -  but I am saying that it needs to have a well-sourced explanation. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 16:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
284697 +++$+++ AperfectHell +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284694 +++$+++ 284696 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 03:44:00 +++$+++ 1.185533040E09 +++$+++ It's relevant and notable in these days more and more emphasis is put on photo manipulation such as the [[Adnan Hajj photographs controversy]] and while we brush it off as a Soviet or Lebanese thing that's not true as history has shown us with the altered Filo shot.  It's even more relevant because at Kent State a fence was put up to stop students from demonstrating by airbrushing the fence pole you remove that fact. --  +++$+++ :::It's relevant and notable in these days more and more emphasis is put on photo manipulation such as the [[Adnan Hajj photographs controversy]] and while we brush it off as a Soviet or Lebanese thing that's not true as history has shown us with the altered Filo shot.  It's even more relevant because at Kent State a fence was put up to stop students from demonstrating by airbrushing the fence pole you remove that fact. -- [[User:AperfectHell|AperfectHell]] 03:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
284698 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284694 +++$+++ 284697 +++$+++ 2007-07-27 04:02:00 +++$+++ 1.185534120E09 +++$+++ Do you have a source about the fence?  If that is true, it might imply some reason for the airbrushing beyond taking the pole out of her head, and if that is sourced, that would be notable and of interest.  Of course I know why altered photos are important - my point is only that to just include it in this article, without some context and explanation of why it is notable to this article, might not work. In an article about altered photos - which I haven't looked, but there could be one - absolutely it should be included. And if you have NPOV sources talking about this manipulation in context, great.  But this is not an article about the photo, it's an article about the murders, and so I'd want to see some connection drawn to the events of May 4. This is just my opinion, of course. <strong> +++$+++ ::::Do you have a source about the fence?  If that is true, it might imply some reason for the airbrushing beyond taking the pole out of her head, and if that is sourced, that would be notable and of interest.  Of course I know why altered photos are important - my point is only that to just include it in this article, without some context and explanation of why it is notable to this article, might not work. In an article about altered photos - which I haven't looked, but there could be one - absolutely it should be included. And if you have NPOV sources talking about this manipulation in context, great.  But this is not an article about the photo, it's an article about the murders, and so I'd want to see some connection drawn to the events of May 4. This is just my opinion, of course. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 04:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

546839 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546839 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-23 15:30:00 +++$+++ 1.251066600E09 +++$+++ Cactus, thank you. And I'm sorry. My edits was based on you at that time only had identified that specific section as plagiarism. And the warning sign was specific for that section, it was disruptive edits from him. You have reply here: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AAsmahan&diff=309611557&oldid=309609842 -- +++$+++ Cactus, thank you. And I'm sorry. My edits was based on you at that time only had identified that specific section as plagiarism. And the warning sign was specific for that section, it was disruptive edits from him. You have reply here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAsmahan&diff=309611557&oldid=309609842 --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 15:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
546840 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546839 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-08-23 16:23:00 +++$+++ 1.251069780E09 +++$+++ you have reply, don't know if you saw it but for the second part, the source was in the page under:http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Talk%3AAsmahan&diff=309619499&oldid=309615515 -- +++$+++ ::you have reply, don't know if you saw it but for the second part, the source was in the page under:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAsmahan&diff=309619499&oldid=309615515 --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 16:23, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

546841 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546841 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-24 13:07:00 +++$+++ 1.251144420E09 +++$+++ Is this ok? -- +++$+++ Is this ok? --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 13:07, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
546842 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546841 +++$+++ 546841 +++$+++ 2009-08-24 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.251148740E09 +++$+++ I suggest you work on rebuilding the early life section first. After that is complete, then move forward to the next section, proceeding in a linear fashion. The reference error is caused by a broken link. I changed them to Harv style. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :I suggest you work on rebuilding the early life section first. After that is complete, then move forward to the next section, proceeding in a linear fashion. The reference error is caused by a broken link. I changed them to Harv style. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
546843 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546841 +++$+++ 546842 +++$+++ 2009-08-24 18:06:00 +++$+++ 1.251162360E09 +++$+++ I think I'm done with the early life section. Can you answer at my suggestions? -- +++$+++ ::I think I'm done with the early life section. Can you answer at my suggestions? --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 18:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
546844 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546841 +++$+++ 546843 +++$+++ 2009-08-24 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.251168900E09 +++$+++ I am surprised that the early life is done already. I recall there was a lot about the immigration to Egypt and the family's early life there. Isn't the early life incomplete without that? <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::I am surprised that the early life is done already. I recall there was a lot about the immigration to Egypt and the family's early life there. Isn't the early life incomplete without that? <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 19:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
546845 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546841 +++$+++ 546844 +++$+++ 2009-08-25 17:10:00 +++$+++ 1.251245400E09 +++$+++ I have already added that they emigrated to Palestine and then to Egypt. Something should indeed be added about they're early life there but I did not ad that text from the beginning and I am not able to rewrite texts in a good way. (I am not a native speaker of english)  -- +++$+++ ::::I have already added that they emigrated to Palestine and then to Egypt. Something should indeed be added about they're early life there but I did not ad that text from the beginning and I am not able to rewrite texts in a good way. (I am not a native speaker of english)  --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 17:10, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
546846 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546841 +++$+++ 546845 +++$+++ 2009-08-25 19:42:00 +++$+++ 1.251254520E09 +++$+++ The problem with emphasizing only a single sentence is that it misses the overall point the author was making in the chapter. The way I understand it the point of the entire chapter entitled \"Syrian or Egyptian?\" is that Asmahan was proud of her Syrian heritage, but it was the freedom of being Egyptian which allowed her to flourish as a singer and actress. Of course, I have only read a few chapters and am not an well-versed on her life. I am moving this entire conversation to [[Talk:Asmahan]] so that more knowledgeable editors can help you. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::::The problem with emphasizing only a single sentence is that it misses the overall point the author was making in the chapter. The way I understand it the point of the entire chapter entitled "Syrian or Egyptian?" is that Asmahan was proud of her Syrian heritage, but it was the freedom of being Egyptian which allowed her to flourish as a singer and actress. Of course, I have only read a few chapters and am not an well-versed on her life. I am moving this entire conversation to [[Talk:Asmahan]] so that more knowledgeable editors can help you. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 19:42, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

22554 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22554 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-17 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.250531520E09 +++$+++ As you are one of the top five contributors, I'm letting you know that James Brown has been nominated for GA Review, and I have started the review. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ As you are one of the top five contributors, I'm letting you know that James Brown has been nominated for GA Review, and I have started the review. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 10:52, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
22555 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22554 +++$+++ 22554 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.250556540E09 +++$+++ There is a lot of work to do. I have put it on hold for seven days; but given the low level of activity so far, I anticipate that the work will not be completed by that time, and the nomination will fail. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :There is a lot of work to do. I have put it on hold for seven days; but given the low level of activity so far, I anticipate that the work will not be completed by that time, and the nomination will fail. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 17:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
22556 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22554 +++$+++ 22555 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 19:17:00 +++$+++ 1.250561820E09 +++$+++ Hey I just got your message. Yeah, we can definitely try to edit some things to make James' article look good. :) I'm down for it.  +++$+++ ::Hey I just got your message. Yeah, we can definitely try to edit some things to make James' article look good. :) I'm down for it. [[User:BrothaTimothy|BrothaTimothy]]&nbsp;([[User talk:BrothaTimothy|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/BrothaTimothy|contribs]]) 19:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
22557 +++$+++ SilkTork +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22554 +++$+++ 22556 +++$+++ 2009-08-17 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.250564820E09 +++$+++ Good on ya! It would be good to see the article improve. <span style=\"border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;\">''' +++$+++ :::Good on ya! It would be good to see the article improve. <span style="border: 1px  #F10; background-color:cream;">'''[[User:SilkTork|<font face="Script MT" color="#1111AA" size="2">SilkTork</font>]]''' *[[User talk:SilkTork|<sup>YES!</sup>]]</span> 20:07, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

284700 +++$+++ Liverpool Scouse +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284700 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-07 20:42:00 +++$+++ 1.186544520E09 +++$+++ I've done bits on bobs on the articles so far, and extensive work today on the 'suggested clues' article, but should you like to contribute to either, in order to improve them, or indeed if you'd prefer to just post suggestions (on their talk pages, or mine), your help and thoughts as a [[WP:BEATLES]] member would be greatly appreciated.  +++$+++ I've done bits on bobs on the articles so far, and extensive work today on the 'suggested clues' article, but should you like to contribute to either, in order to improve them, or indeed if you'd prefer to just post suggestions (on their talk pages, or mine), your help and thoughts as a [[WP:BEATLES]] member would be greatly appreciated. [[User:Liverpool Scouse|Liverpool Scouse]] 20:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
284701 +++$+++ Cgingold +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284700 +++$+++ 284700 +++$+++ 2007-08-13 02:39:00 +++$+++ 1.186997940E09 +++$+++ hi, just wanted to be sure you know that I sent you that email this morning.  +++$+++ :hi, just wanted to be sure you know that I sent you that email this morning. [[User:Cgingold|Cgingold]] 02:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

22559 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22559 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-02 22:00:00 +++$+++ 1.257228000E09 +++$+++ Hi, Brotha Timothy! I know that you and Furious Freddy (aka B Touch) happen to be the main contributors to The Supremes and also Diana Ross material here on Wikipedia. You have both done an amazing job on this! I want to ask you (and Furious Freddy) for your help on the dates for this link, please. If you click on it, go to the talk page and my question there is for the two of you. Also, The Beatles and The Supremes are my favorite groups. They were the top two music acts in the world during the 1960s, as you probably already know. I am at the moment involved in a project called [[The Beatles timeline]]. When this gets done, I am hoping that you and Furious Freddy can help me out on a new project which will be called 'The Supremes timeline'. When this is about to begin, I will immediately notify you. It should be either this Saturday or maybe next Saturday. Thanks! Best, -- +++$+++ Hi, Brotha Timothy! I know that you and Furious Freddy (aka B Touch) happen to be the main contributors to The Supremes and also Diana Ross material here on Wikipedia. You have both done an amazing job on this! I want to ask you (and Furious Freddy) for your help on the dates for this link, please. If you click on it, go to the talk page and my question there is for the two of you. Also, The Beatles and The Supremes are my favorite groups. They were the top two music acts in the world during the 1960s, as you probably already know. I am at the moment involved in a project called [[The Beatles timeline]]. When this gets done, I am hoping that you and Furious Freddy can help me out on a new project which will be called 'The Supremes timeline'. When this is about to begin, I will immediately notify you. It should be either this Saturday or maybe next Saturday. Thanks! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 22:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
22560 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22559 +++$+++ 22559 +++$+++ 2009-11-02 22:28:00 +++$+++ 1.257229680E09 +++$+++ Thta's what I want to hear Brotha Timothy! I definately will be keeping in touch with you. Thanks! Best, -- +++$+++ :Thta's what I want to hear Brotha Timothy! I definately will be keeping in touch with you. Thanks! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 22:28, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
22561 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22559 +++$+++ 22560 +++$+++ 2009-11-07 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.257581580E09 +++$+++ Well, I'm making progress on [[The Supremes timeline]]. I found in an edit you did yesterday on [[Cindy Birdsong]] that you (correctedly) changed her birth year from 1939 to 1942. If you like to do any editing there in correcting or filling in date blanks or adding somethimg in, it's okay. I could use your Supreme expertise in helping out on this. If you have any questions about the template timeline rule, or anything, just let me know. Thanks! Best, -- +++$+++ ::Well, I'm making progress on [[The Supremes timeline]]. I found in an edit you did yesterday on [[Cindy Birdsong]] that you (correctedly) changed her birth year from 1939 to 1942. If you like to do any editing there in correcting or filling in date blanks or adding somethimg in, it's okay. I could use your Supreme expertise in helping out on this. If you have any questions about the template timeline rule, or anything, just let me know. Thanks! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 00:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
22562 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22559 +++$+++ 22561 +++$+++ 2009-11-09 00:02:00 +++$+++ 1.257753720E09 +++$+++ If we can find something showing Cindy's correct age, that will be great. We probably should change it back from 1942 to 1939, so not to cause any problems. With her being a nurse also, she could have went to school, too. Best, -- +++$+++ :::If we can find something showing Cindy's correct age, that will be great. We probably should change it back from 1942 to 1939, so not to cause any problems. With her being a nurse also, she could have went to school, too. Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 00:02, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

284704 +++$+++ Jossi +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284704 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-10 20:39:00 +++$+++ 1.186803540E09 +++$+++ ... at [[Barak Obama]], warrants a 24 hrs block for [[WP:3RR]] violation. Either stop editwarring, or give me a good reason why not to enforce a block.  +++$+++ ... at [[Barak Obama]], warrants a 24 hrs block for [[WP:3RR]] violation. Either stop editwarring, or give me a good reason why not to enforce a block. [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 20:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
284705 +++$+++ Bobblehead +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-10 21:15:00 +++$+++ 1.186805700E09 +++$+++ I also replied to this on [[Talk:Barack Obama]], but all reverts in the last few days have been to enforce the ban of {{user5|Dereks1x}} and are therefore [[WP:3RR#Exceptions|exempt from 3RR]].-- +++$+++ ::I also replied to this on [[Talk:Barack Obama]], but all reverts in the last few days have been to enforce the ban of {{user5|Dereks1x}} and are therefore [[WP:3RR#Exceptions|exempt from 3RR]].--[[User:Bobblehead|Bobblehead]] <sup>[[User talk:Bobblehead|(rants)]]</sup> 21:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
284706 +++$+++ Italiavivi +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284704 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-12 06:00:00 +++$+++ 1.186923600E09 +++$+++ Jossi, '''you need to cool down your sysop heels right now'''.  You're stepping way, way out of line here with these threats.  Anymore of this and I'll personally go to AN\/I to get some community feedback on your behavior.  You owe Tvoz an apology.  +++$+++ :::Jossi, '''you need to cool down your sysop heels right now'''.  You're stepping way, way out of line here with these threats.  Anymore of this and I'll personally go to AN/I to get some community feedback on your behavior.  You owe Tvoz an apology. [[User:Italiavivi|Italiavivi]] 06:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

284708 +++$+++ Radiant! +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284708 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-14 08:03:00 +++$+++ 1.187103780E09 +++$+++ Well, no. I was closing the entries for August 8th, on August 13th; that seems hardly problematic. Please realize that CFD is not decided by vote count, but by strength of argument. For instance, procedural arguments like \"keep all and relist separately\" do not hold much weight unless there is actual policy to back them up (which, in this case, there's not). HTH!  +++$+++ Well, no. I was closing the entries for August 8th, on August 13th; that seems hardly problematic. Please realize that CFD is not decided by vote count, but by strength of argument. For instance, procedural arguments like "keep all and relist separately" do not hold much weight unless there is actual policy to back them up (which, in this case, there's not). HTH! [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#0000DD">&gt;<font color="#0066FF">R<font color="#0099FF">a<font color="#00CCFF">d<font color="#00EEFF">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 08:03, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
284709 +++$+++ Radiant! +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284708 +++$+++ 284708 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 13:10:00 +++$+++ 1.187122200E09 +++$+++ Aside from that you seem to be misinformed about the nature of consensus on Wikipedia, which is indeed decided by strength of argument rather than strength of numbers. One reason for that is that for numbers to be useful, one would need to get a significant percentage of editors involved, which given our high popularity would mean at least 10,000 people. Obviously this is impractical. Another reason is that arguments founded in policy, fact, or precedent have more weight than arguments founded on opinion, logical fallacy, or misconception. HTH!  +++$+++ *Aside from that you seem to be misinformed about the nature of consensus on Wikipedia, which is indeed decided by strength of argument rather than strength of numbers. One reason for that is that for numbers to be useful, one would need to get a significant percentage of editors involved, which given our high popularity would mean at least 10,000 people. Obviously this is impractical. Another reason is that arguments founded in policy, fact, or precedent have more weight than arguments founded on opinion, logical fallacy, or misconception. HTH! [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#0000DD">&gt;<font color="#0066FF">R<font color="#0099FF">a<font color="#00CCFF">d<font color="#00EEFF">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 13:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
284710 +++$+++ Radiant! +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284708 +++$+++ 284709 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 13:28:00 +++$+++ 1.187123280E09 +++$+++ You are welcome to try and reform the deletion processes from the way they presently work to the way you believe they should work. Discussions must be concluded at some point. Five days is as arbitrary as any other amount, but keeping them open until everybody is in agreement is not going to work. Also, if you really think that deletion is worse than keeping, I'd suggest you spend some days running [[WP:NPP|new page patrol]].  +++$+++ **You are welcome to try and reform the deletion processes from the way they presently work to the way you believe they should work. Discussions must be concluded at some point. Five days is as arbitrary as any other amount, but keeping them open until everybody is in agreement is not going to work. Also, if you really think that deletion is worse than keeping, I'd suggest you spend some days running [[WP:NPP|new page patrol]]. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#0000DD">&gt;<font color="#0066FF">R<font color="#0099FF">a<font color="#00CCFF">d<font color="#00EEFF">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 13:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
284711 +++$+++ Radiant! +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284708 +++$+++ 284710 +++$+++ 2007-08-14 13:51:00 +++$+++ 1.187124660E09 +++$+++ There is a difference between \"dismissing an argument\" and \"recognizing a fallacy\".  +++$+++ ***There is a difference between "dismissing an argument" and "recognizing a fallacy". [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#0000DD">&gt;<font color="#0066FF">R<font color="#0099FF">a<font color="#00CCFF">d<font color="#00EEFF">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 13:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

546862 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546862 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-29 12:13:00 +++$+++ 1.251573180E09 +++$+++ Ah, thank you. I should just use G12 on [[Dagoth Ur]], then? ''''' +++$+++ Ah, thank you. I should just use G12 on [[Dagoth Ur]], then? '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 12:13, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
546863 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546862 +++$+++ 546862 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 12:18:00 +++$+++ 1.251573480E09 +++$+++ As it is now, yes, it's a G12. On the other hand, [http:\/\/annex.wikia.com\/wiki\/Dagoth_Ur this page is available for copy]. It's up to you, but there are a lot of other issues there it seems.. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :As it is now, yes, it's a G12. On the other hand, [http://annex.wikia.com/wiki/Dagoth_Ur this page is available for copy]. It's up to you, but there are a lot of other issues there it seems.. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 12:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
546864 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546862 +++$+++ 546863 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 12:24:00 +++$+++ 1.251573840E09 +++$+++ Yeah, I'll just redirect it to ''[[The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind]]''. ''''' +++$+++ ::Yeah, I'll just redirect it to ''[[The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind]]''. '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 12:24, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
546865 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546862 +++$+++ 546864 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 12:25:00 +++$+++ 1.251573900E09 +++$+++ Good choice. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::: Good choice. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 12:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
546866 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546862 +++$+++ 546865 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 12:43:00 +++$+++ 1.251574980E09 +++$+++ Hi. :) Just wanted to let you know that the FAQ was ''badly'' misleading. :\/ I've corrected it to accord with the Foundation's Terms of Use. 2.5 should be compatible with 3.0 (I've explained why in more details at my talk page). I'm glad you pointed that out! -- +++$+++ ::::Hi. :) Just wanted to let you know that the FAQ was ''badly'' misleading. :/ I've corrected it to accord with the Foundation's Terms of Use. 2.5 should be compatible with 3.0 (I've explained why in more details at my talk page). I'm glad you pointed that out! --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 12:43, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
546867 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546862 +++$+++ 546866 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 12:53:00 +++$+++ 1.251575580E09 +++$+++ Okay. Thank you clarifying that. Maybe one of these days I'll get it all straight. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::::Okay. Thank you clarifying that. Maybe one of these days I'll get it all straight. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 12:53, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
546868 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546862 +++$+++ 546867 +++$+++ 2009-08-29 13:03:00 +++$+++ 1.251576180E09 +++$+++ Let me know if you do. :) I'm always finding things I have to track down somebody to clarify. I haven't had to write Mike Godwin in a while, but I bet he still cringes when he sees an e-mail from me. :D -- +++$+++ ::::::Let me know if you do. :) I'm always finding things I have to track down somebody to clarify. I haven't had to write Mike Godwin in a while, but I bet he still cringes when he sees an e-mail from me. :D --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 13:03, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

284719 +++$+++ Bielle +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284719 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 03:34:00 +++$+++ 1.187519640E09 +++$+++ I have just finished reading the discussion page for this article.  You have been amazingly patient in explaining the problem.. I am surprised, and most impressed, that you never appear to have succumbed to what must have been a very strong temptation to cut-and-paste.  +++$+++ I have just finished reading the discussion page for this article.  You have been amazingly patient in explaining the problem.. I am surprised, and most impressed, that you never appear to have succumbed to what must have been a very strong temptation to cut-and-paste. [[User:Bielle|Bielle]] 03:34, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
284720 +++$+++ Bielle +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284719 +++$+++ 284719 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 04:26:00 +++$+++ 1.187522760E09 +++$+++ You are quite welcome. I can't see how the matter could be better explained. I am reminded of my grandmother who used to call me \"wilfully obtuse\" when I refused to see what she was saying because I did not want to see it. (This usually arose around my failures to meet household responsibilities or to meet curfews.) So many editors don't seem to grasp the difference between \"verifiable\" and \"true\", and between conclusions purely logic driven, like those in a mathematical proof, and those requiring leaps of faith, otherwise known as \"original research\". Keep up the good fight. I suspect it will all settle out at the mediation review.  +++$+++ :You are quite welcome. I can't see how the matter could be better explained. I am reminded of my grandmother who used to call me "wilfully obtuse" when I refused to see what she was saying because I did not want to see it. (This usually arose around my failures to meet household responsibilities or to meet curfews.) So many editors don't seem to grasp the difference between "verifiable" and "true", and between conclusions purely logic driven, like those in a mathematical proof, and those requiring leaps of faith, otherwise known as "original research". Keep up the good fight. I suspect it will all settle out at the mediation review. [[User:Bielle|Bielle]] 04:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
284721 +++$+++ Bielle +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284719 +++$+++ 284720 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 04:40:00 +++$+++ 1.187523600E09 +++$+++ I will look at the article again tomorrow to see if I think I can help, by whatever means. It is too late tonight.  It doesn't help that the article is also poorly written, does it?  +++$+++ ::I will look at the article again tomorrow to see if I think I can help, by whatever means. It is too late tonight.  It doesn't help that the article is also poorly written, does it? [[User:Bielle|Bielle]] 04:40, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
284722 +++$+++ Bellagio99 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284719 +++$+++ 284720 +++$+++ 2007-08-19 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.187556480E09 +++$+++ See my just-posted note in on AFD for keeping Bay Valley Foods. I do agree with Bielle that the article could be better written.  +++$+++ ::See my just-posted note in on AFD for keeping Bay Valley Foods. I do agree with Bielle that the article could be better written. [[User:Bellagio99|Bellagio99]] 13:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

524494 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524494 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-11 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.192095720E09 +++$+++ Hi, AnonEMouse. Here's a philosophical conundrum that's been working at me for quite some time: What is porn? Several of the movies\/actresses\/directors I've classified as porn (i.e., \"Roman porn\", \"Pink\", \"Pinky\") almost certainly not live up to most Americans' conception of \"porn\" as it exists today... I'm dubious about the [[:Category: Japanese porn stars]] at [[Reiko Ike]], but the one that I'm wondering about right now is ''[[School of the Holy Beast]]''. It's Pinky. It's Nunsploitation. But porn? I prefer the term \"Erotic cinema\" since, certainly, these films all focus on eroticism... But are they porn?... Though I suppose they do meet the requirements for \"softcore\". (This also may touch on the debate going on [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:List_of_big-bust_models_and_performers#Revision_thoughts here] about big bust model\/performers between the West & Japan as well. Different countries\/cultures, different standards\/traditions...)  +++$+++ Hi, AnonEMouse. Here's a philosophical conundrum that's been working at me for quite some time: What is porn? Several of the movies/actresses/directors I've classified as porn (i.e., "Roman porn", "Pink", "Pinky") almost certainly not live up to most Americans' conception of "porn" as it exists today... I'm dubious about the [[:Category: Japanese porn stars]] at [[Reiko Ike]], but the one that I'm wondering about right now is ''[[School of the Holy Beast]]''. It's Pinky. It's Nunsploitation. But porn? I prefer the term "Erotic cinema" since, certainly, these films all focus on eroticism... But are they porn?... Though I suppose they do meet the requirements for "softcore". (This also may touch on the debate going on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_big-bust_models_and_performers#Revision_thoughts here] about big bust model/performers between the West & Japan as well. Different countries/cultures, different standards/traditions...) [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 02:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
524495 +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524494 +++$+++ 524494 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 12:30:00 +++$+++ 1.192131000E09 +++$+++ Oh, if only we had a good encyclopedia at hand ... wait ... :-) [[Pornography]] quoth \"the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity with the goal of sexual arousal and\/or sexual relief.\" That sounds like a pretty good definition, and fairly consistent with the American Heritage Dictionary's \"Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal\".[http:\/\/dictionary.reference.com\/search?q=pornography] Your article says \"Pinky violence\", which implies nuns getting beaten up, which, that doesn't seem like \"human body or sexual activity\", so wouldn't fit. The cover image in the infobox, on the other hand, also implies a certain amount of gratutious nudity, so if then I imagine it would. -- +++$+++ : Oh, if only we had a good encyclopedia at hand ... wait ... :-) [[Pornography]] quoth "the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity with the goal of sexual arousal and/or sexual relief." That sounds like a pretty good definition, and fairly consistent with the American Heritage Dictionary's "Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal".[http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pornography] Your article says "Pinky violence", which implies nuns getting beaten up, which, that doesn't seem like "human body or sexual activity", so wouldn't fit. The cover image in the infobox, on the other hand, also implies a certain amount of gratutious nudity, so if then I imagine it would. --[[User:AnonEMouse|AnonEMouse]] <sup>[[User_talk:AnonEMouse|(squeak)]]</sup> 12:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
524496 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524494 +++$+++ 524495 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 15:51:00 +++$+++ 1.192143060E09 +++$+++ Well, with \"goal of sexual arousal,\" intent becomes the question... And yes, I'd say the nude cat-fights in the Pinky violence, and the nude beatings, etc. in the Nunsploitation flicks do have that intent. So you've set my mind at rest there at least. Thanks, Anon... On the other hand, many of the clearly, explicitly and self-proclaimed pornography, like ''[[Angel Guts]]'' and the films of [[Koji Wakamatsu]] and [[Hisayasu Sato]], seem to me to have more of an intension to shock and horrify than to arouse... But I suppose I'm splitting hairs here. Ahem... Back to work...  +++$+++ :: Well, with "goal of sexual arousal," intent becomes the question... And yes, I'd say the nude cat-fights in the Pinky violence, and the nude beatings, etc. in the Nunsploitation flicks do have that intent. So you've set my mind at rest there at least. Thanks, Anon... On the other hand, many of the clearly, explicitly and self-proclaimed pornography, like ''[[Angel Guts]]'' and the films of [[Koji Wakamatsu]] and [[Hisayasu Sato]], seem to me to have more of an intension to shock and horrify than to arouse... But I suppose I'm splitting hairs here. Ahem... Back to work... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 15:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
524497 +++$+++ Videmus Omnia +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524494 +++$+++ 524496 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 20:04:00 +++$+++ 1.192158240E09 +++$+++ Speaking of which, everyone's favorite [[Keeani Lei]] image is up for deletion at Commons. I'm neutral about it - don't think I'm even going to comment in the deletion discussion.  +++$+++ ::: Speaking of which, everyone's favorite [[Keeani Lei]] image is up for deletion at Commons. I'm neutral about it - don't think I'm even going to comment in the deletion discussion. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 20:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
524498 +++$+++ Dekkappai +++$+++ AnonEMouse +++$+++ 524494 +++$+++ 524497 +++$+++ 2007-10-11 20:15:00 +++$+++ 1.192158900E09 +++$+++ Zounds! One may debate the intent behind the nude nun-flagellation, but there's no doubt about the intent of that image of Ms. Lei, VO. Here's hoping the image continues to grace a Wiki-page. Cheers!  +++$+++ :::: Zounds! One may debate the intent behind the nude nun-flagellation, but there's no doubt about the intent of that image of Ms. Lei, VO. Here's hoping the image continues to grace a Wiki-page. Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 20:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

22577 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22577 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-04-01 00:36:00 +++$+++ 1.270107360E09 +++$+++ Hi,BrothaTimothy! I've asked [[User:Moxy]] to turn this into a portal, which could have never became as great an article it is if it weren't for you! Being his ''anniversary'' (dates that is, death and birth) this would be a good time to do this. You've done really good on this my friend, including related articles, to his main page. Best, -- +++$+++ Hi,BrothaTimothy! I've asked [[User:Moxy]] to turn this into a portal, which could have never became as great an article it is if it weren't for you! Being his ''anniversary'' (dates that is, death and birth) this would be a good time to do this. You've done really good on this my friend, including related articles, to his main page. Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 00:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
22578 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22577 +++$+++ 22577 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 05:59:00 +++$+++ 1.270126740E09 +++$+++ [[Marvin Gaye]] had two music videos, according to his [[Marvin Gaye discography|discography]] infobox. I believe \"[[Sexual Healing]]\" is one, since I remember seeing it back in the 1980s on TV, but am not sure on the other. Can you let me know what it's called, and also verify if the infobox number is correctly two music videos, please? Thanks my friend! Best, -- +++$+++ :[[Marvin Gaye]] had two music videos, according to his [[Marvin Gaye discography|discography]] infobox. I believe "[[Sexual Healing]]" is one, since I remember seeing it back in the 1980s on TV, but am not sure on the other. Can you let me know what it's called, and also verify if the infobox number is correctly two music videos, please? Thanks my friend! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 05:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
22579 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22577 +++$+++ 22578 +++$+++ 2010-04-01 22:48:00 +++$+++ 1.270187280E09 +++$+++ Hi, well I fixed up [[Marvin Gaye discography]], feel free to make any changes you see need done. Best, -- +++$+++ ::Hi, well I fixed up [[Marvin Gaye discography]], feel free to make any changes you see need done. Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 22:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
22580 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22577 +++$+++ 22579 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 00:05:00 +++$+++ 1.270796700E09 +++$+++ BrothaTimothy, hi, I've asked Moxy about this again, and he says he's waiting for some fair-use images which he's sent off for before he creates this portal. Good!  \"...listenning to Marvin, all night long...\" (\"[[True (Spandau Ballet song)|True]]\", 1983). Best, -- +++$+++ :::BrothaTimothy, hi, I've asked Moxy about this again, and he says he's waiting for some fair-use images which he's sent off for before he creates this portal. Good!  "...listenning to Marvin, all night long..." ("[[True (Spandau Ballet song)|True]]", 1983). Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 00:05, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
22581 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22577 +++$+++ 22580 +++$+++ 2010-04-09 00:13:00 +++$+++ 1.270797180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the message, that was quick! Oh, I love that category you created. Songs in memory of Marvin Gaye! Best, -- +++$+++ ::::Thanks for the message, that was quick! Oh, I love that category you created. Songs in memory of Marvin Gaye! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 00:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

284723 +++$+++ Italiavivi +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284723 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-22 14:49:00 +++$+++ 1.187819340E09 +++$+++ Zsero has resumed his deletion of the age difference between [[Fred Thompson]] and [[Jeri Kehn Thompson]].  As a participant in previous Talk discussion on this matter, your presence at [[Talk:Fred Thompson]] would be appreciated.  +++$+++ Zsero has resumed his deletion of the age difference between [[Fred Thompson]] and [[Jeri Kehn Thompson]].  As a participant in previous Talk discussion on this matter, your presence at [[Talk:Fred Thompson]] would be appreciated. [[User:Italiavivi|Italia]]<sup>[[User_talk:Italiavivi|vivi]]</sup> 14:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
284724 +++$+++ Zsero +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284723 +++$+++ 284723 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 03:37:00 +++$+++ 1.187951820E09 +++$+++ Tvoz, it is you and Italiavivi who do not have consensus to put the difference ''in''.  As I have exhaustively demonstrated, it was out and everything was peaceful until Italiavivi insisted on inserting it.  Since then ''several'' editors have removed it, not just me - look at the history; meanwhile neither of you have given even one substantive argument for why you want it in - it's been nothing but \"we want it in\" and demanding explanations from everyone else for why we want it out.  If you want it in, ''make an argument for its relevance''.  Until then, your preferred position is not privileged, and you have no more right to put it in than I have to take it out again.   +++$+++ : Tvoz, it is you and Italiavivi who do not have consensus to put the difference ''in''.  As I have exhaustively demonstrated, it was out and everything was peaceful until Italiavivi insisted on inserting it.  Since then ''several'' editors have removed it, not just me - look at the history; meanwhile neither of you have given even one substantive argument for why you want it in - it's been nothing but "we want it in" and demanding explanations from everyone else for why we want it out.  If you want it in, ''make an argument for its relevance''.  Until then, your preferred position is not privileged, and you have no more right to put it in than I have to take it out again.  [[User:Zsero|Zsero]] 03:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

284725 +++$+++ Ferrylodge +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284725 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-24 04:10:00 +++$+++ 1.187953800E09 +++$+++ Tvoz, as you know, I've never posted at your talk page before, but I would like to do so now.  The following all support keeping out of the [[Fred Thompson]] article the ages when they got married, and the age difference when they got married:  Ferrylodge, Bytebear, Zsero, Sbowers3, Arzel.  Various other editors (including yourself) feel differently.  But according to [[WP:BLP]], it is the responsibility of the person ''adding or re-adding'' information to justify their edits. It is '''not''' up to anyone to \"prove\" why a statement should be deleted. The burden of proof rests on the \"includer\", not the \"deleter\".  In this case, as Zsero [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User_talk:Zsero\/Fred_Thompson has documented], their ages at marriage have been in this article for only a small period of time. +++$+++ Tvoz, as you know, I've never posted at your talk page before, but I would like to do so now.  The following all support keeping out of the [[Fred Thompson]] article the ages when they got married, and the age difference when they got married:  Ferrylodge, Bytebear, Zsero, Sbowers3, Arzel.  Various other editors (including yourself) feel differently.  But according to [[WP:BLP]], it is the responsibility of the person ''adding or re-adding'' information to justify their edits. It is '''not''' up to anyone to "prove" why a statement should be deleted. The burden of proof rests on the "includer", not the "deleter".  In this case, as Zsero [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Zsero/Fred_Thompson has documented], their ages at marriage have been in this article for only a small period of time.[[User:Ferrylodge|Ferrylodge]] 04:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
284726 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284725 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-24 04:41:00 +++$+++ 1.187955660E09 +++$+++ But your facts are not correct. Can we move this to [[Talk:Fred Thompson]] please? I have replied to you there. <strong> +++$+++ ::But your facts are not correct. Can we move this to [[Talk:Fred Thompson]] please? I have replied to you there. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 04:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

22583 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22583 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-05-11 21:28:00 +++$+++ 1.273638480E09 +++$+++ Please check this out (concerning her birth year - review the last few edits), my friend! Best, -- +++$+++ Please check this out (concerning her birth year - review the last few edits), my friend! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 21:28, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
22584 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22583 +++$+++ 22583 +++$+++ 2010-05-11 23:10:00 +++$+++ 1.273644600E09 +++$+++ Oh, I just found out it officially is 1939 - so, we stand correct! Best, -- +++$+++ :Oh, I just found out it officially is 1939 - so, we stand correct! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 23:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
22585 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22583 +++$+++ 22584 +++$+++ 2010-05-11 23:18:00 +++$+++ 1.273645080E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Hey, have you considered on creating a \"book\" for [[Marvin Gaye]]? You can format it after [[Book:The Supremes]] which I created! Best, -- +++$+++ ::Thanks! Hey, have you considered on creating a "book" for [[Marvin Gaye]]? You can format it after [[Book:The Supremes]] which I created! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 23:18, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
22586 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22583 +++$+++ 22585 +++$+++ 2010-05-11 23:23:00 +++$+++ 1.273645380E09 +++$+++ If any one can do it, it's you! Best, -- +++$+++ :::If any one can do it, it's you! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 23:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
22587 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22583 +++$+++ 22586 +++$+++ 2010-05-11 23:29:00 +++$+++ 1.273645740E09 +++$+++ Thanks my friend, you are too! Best, -- +++$+++ ::::Thanks my friend, you are too! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 23:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

284730 +++$+++ Arcayne +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284730 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-29 06:04:00 +++$+++ 1.188392640E09 +++$+++ I guess you could say I have some opinions of the man :). Fortunately, they are shared by folk much, much smarter than I. -  +++$+++ I guess you could say I have some opinions of the man :). Fortunately, they are shared by folk much, much smarter than I. - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 06:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
284731 +++$+++ Arcayne +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-08-29 06:51:00 +++$+++ 1.188395460E09 +++$+++ And yeah. Seraphimblade is pretty friggin' brilliant. He and Erik are the two more level-headed folk I am on good terms with who know how to carve people into puppy chow when they get out of line, and make them feel bad that it had to happen. All the more reason to pay attention to his advice when he advises me how to sidestep citation issues (and not dash the \"Beatle Experts\" upon the jagged Valley of My Disdain - lol). -  +++$+++ ::And yeah. Seraphimblade is pretty friggin' brilliant. He and Erik are the two more level-headed folk I am on good terms with who know how to carve people into puppy chow when they get out of line, and make them feel bad that it had to happen. All the more reason to pay attention to his advice when he advises me how to sidestep citation issues (and not dash the "Beatle Experts" upon the jagged Valley of My Disdain - lol). - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 06:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
284732 +++$+++ LessHeard vanU +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284730 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-04 20:53:00 +++$+++ 1.188964380E09 +++$+++ Being an admin is okay, the rewards are not what I expected - but then I misread [[porcupines]] for [[concubines]] so I am to blame, I guess!  +++$+++ ::::Being an admin is okay, the rewards are not what I expected - but then I misread [[porcupines]] for [[concubines]] so I am to blame, I guess! [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] 20:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

546876 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546876 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-08-31 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.251755160E09 +++$+++ ACs edits at the asmahan article. Amongst them: this was removed \"'Alia and the three children moved to Beirut, then to Haifa, Palestine and eventually immigrated to Egypt.\"  and also in the marriage section he removed that she had \"returned\" to Syria to \"relocated\". Because he doesn't think she lived there. We have been over this before, the author uses the word \"returned\" at one point and \"relocated\" at another. He also removed that she had been \"required\" to sing. Dont know if you actually supported the removal of it. And also he added something to the first part of the early life section that I do not believe have anything to to with early life.  -- +++$+++ ACs edits at the asmahan article. Amongst them: this was removed "'Alia and the three children moved to Beirut, then to Haifa, Palestine and eventually immigrated to Egypt."  and also in the marriage section he removed that she had "returned" to Syria to "relocated". Because he doesn't think she lived there. We have been over this before, the author uses the word "returned" at one point and "relocated" at another. He also removed that she had been "required" to sing. Dont know if you actually supported the removal of it. And also he added something to the first part of the early life section that I do not believe have anything to to with early life.  --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 14:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
546877 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546876 +++$+++ 546876 +++$+++ 2009-08-31 20:31:00 +++$+++ 1.251775860E09 +++$+++ I do not know why he removed Beirut and Palestine, they were both referenced. Relocated or returned - either way -- because the reader will already understand that she lived there as a child. The \"required to sing\" was still being discussed, but as you know, I found it fairly meaningless anyway. And if you are talking about the \"princely family\" paragraph, not only is that meaningless to the biography, it appears to be an extreme fringe viewpoint. The Al-Taba'i book (which was written in 1965, only republished in 2009) was mostly discredited by Zuhur. Any other source lists Al-Atrash as Amir, Prince, Druze leader, etc. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :I do not know why he removed Beirut and Palestine, they were both referenced. Relocated or returned - either way -- because the reader will already understand that she lived there as a child. The "required to sing" was still being discussed, but as you know, I found it fairly meaningless anyway. And if you are talking about the "princely family" paragraph, not only is that meaningless to the biography, it appears to be an extreme fringe viewpoint. The Al-Taba'i book (which was written in 1965, only republished in 2009) was mostly discredited by Zuhur. Any other source lists Al-Atrash as Amir, Prince, Druze leader, etc. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 20:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
546878 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546876 +++$+++ 546877 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.251830340E09 +++$+++ What discussion? shouldn't the discussion begin if someone wants to delete something from the article as he did in two places? And is it really necessary to discuss a clarification of where al-Qrayya is?-- +++$+++ ::What discussion? shouldn't the discussion begin if someone wants to delete something from the article as he did in two places? And is it really necessary to discuss a clarification of where al-Qrayya is?--[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 11:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
546879 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546876 +++$+++ 546878 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 13:38:00 +++$+++ 1.251837480E09 +++$+++ No. You have been warned too often for just this kind of thing -- quick reversions. You need to slow down. Grabbing my opinion off this talk page, pasting it onto the article talk page and then using that as an excuse to make your own reversions is poor form. Especially, when you deleted AC's paragraph because I said it was out of context or \"meaningless\", but replaced your own sentence even though I had also told you I considered it out of context. You need to use the talk page and allow for discussion or response. It might take days for a response. This isn't life or death surgery. Have some patience. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::No. You have been warned too often for just this kind of thing -- quick reversions. You need to slow down. Grabbing my opinion off this talk page, pasting it onto the article talk page and then using that as an excuse to make your own reversions is poor form. Especially, when you deleted AC's paragraph because I said it was out of context or "meaningless", but replaced your own sentence even though I had also told you I considered it out of context. You need to use the talk page and allow for discussion or response. It might take days for a response. This isn't life or death surgery. Have some patience. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 13:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
546880 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546876 +++$+++ 546879 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 13:48:00 +++$+++ 1.251838080E09 +++$+++ Why do you accept him deleting the sentence that I had added then? Why didn't you revert it when he deleted it? Discussion with him hasnt worked for half a year, so why would it now? Until now it has been his way or edit war.-- +++$+++ ::::Why do you accept him deleting the sentence that I had added then? Why didn't you revert it when he deleted it? Discussion with him hasnt worked for half a year, so why would it now? Until now it has been his way or edit war.--[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 13:48, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
546881 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546876 +++$+++ 546879 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.251839700E09 +++$+++ I would like an answer to my post here above why you let him delete the sentence I had added. And what am I supposed to do now at the talkpage? Your post has been added there.-- +++$+++ ::::I would like an answer to my post here above why you let him delete the sentence I had added. And what am I supposed to do now at the talkpage? Your post has been added there.--[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 14:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
546882 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546876 +++$+++ 546881 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 09:00:00 +++$+++ 1.251907200E09 +++$+++ I suggest you take it to [[WP:3O]] or [[WP:DRR]]. If you are interested in actual mediation, than you must be willing to accept third-party advice -- even when that opinion goes against your own wishes. You have previously had mediation from good editors who walked away after growing weary of constant arguing over minor issues - especially after giving an opinion. I fully relate to their experience. I also recommend that you find a mediator who understands Arabic since some of the references require it. I think you should refamiliarize yourself with the entire editing policy page starting with [[WP:IMPERFECT]] and [[Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary]]. Good luck. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::::: I suggest you take it to [[WP:3O]] or [[WP:DRR]]. If you are interested in actual mediation, than you must be willing to accept third-party advice -- even when that opinion goes against your own wishes. You have previously had mediation from good editors who walked away after growing weary of constant arguing over minor issues - especially after giving an opinion. I fully relate to their experience. I also recommend that you find a mediator who understands Arabic since some of the references require it. I think you should refamiliarize yourself with the entire editing policy page starting with [[WP:IMPERFECT]] and [[Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary]]. Good luck. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 09:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
546883 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546876 +++$+++ 546882 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 12:07:00 +++$+++ 1.251918420E09 +++$+++ How can you even suggest something like that when i have told you before that I asked for 3O and AC did not listen to him and we got another mediator that AC did not listen to? You have not answered me above and I want an answer. I'm serious. Why did you accept him deleting the sentences that I had added, yet you reverted my edits? Including an explanation for where Al-Qrayya is which is of no controversy at all? You said to me: \"use the talk page and allow for discussion and response.\" Then why didnt you revert my edits AC had deleted and tell him to do the same? -- +++$+++ ::::::How can you even suggest something like that when i have told you before that I asked for 3O and AC did not listen to him and we got another mediator that AC did not listen to? You have not answered me above and I want an answer. I'm serious. Why did you accept him deleting the sentences that I had added, yet you reverted my edits? Including an explanation for where Al-Qrayya is which is of no controversy at all? You said to me: "use the talk page and allow for discussion and response." Then why didnt you revert my edits AC had deleted and tell him to do the same? --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 12:07, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

396981 +++$+++ Pointillist +++$+++ Edward +++$+++ 396981 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-11 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.299898200E09 +++$+++ Hi Edward. Back in 2008 you okayed copying [[:File:Kirkham and Wesham railway station in 2008.jpg]] from Flikr ([http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/67476742@N00\/2534316181\/ here]) to Commons, and added it to the [[Kirkham and Wesham railway station]] article ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Kirkham_and_Wesham_railway_station&oldid=216237705 diff]). I've just been trying to improve it in Photoshop and discovered that the license at Flikr is [http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nd\/2.0\/ \"Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-ND 2.0)\"]. Can I make a derivative now that it is cc-by-sa on Commons, or do we need to ask the owner on Flikr to change her licensing? -  +++$+++ Hi Edward. Back in 2008 you okayed copying [[:File:Kirkham and Wesham railway station in 2008.jpg]] from Flikr ([http://www.flickr.com/photos/67476742@N00/2534316181/ here]) to Commons, and added it to the [[Kirkham and Wesham railway station]] article ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kirkham_and_Wesham_railway_station&oldid=216237705 diff]). I've just been trying to improve it in Photoshop and discovered that the license at Flikr is [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/ "Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-ND 2.0)"]. Can I make a derivative now that it is cc-by-sa on Commons, or do we need to ask the owner on Flikr to change her licensing? - [[User:Pointillist|Pointillist]] ([[User talk:Pointillist|talk]]) 18:50, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
396982 +++$+++ Pointillist +++$+++ Edward +++$+++ 396981 +++$+++ 396981 +++$+++ 2011-03-12 00:28:00 +++$+++ 1.299918480E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your reply on my talk page ([http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3APointillist&action=historysubmit&diff=418342749&oldid=418147583 diff]). All done now. -  +++$+++ *Thanks for your reply on my talk page ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APointillist&action=historysubmit&diff=418342749&oldid=418147583 diff]). All done now. - [[User:Pointillist|Pointillist]] ([[User talk:Pointillist|talk]]) 00:28, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

22593 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22593 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-12-31 22:37:00 +++$+++ 1.293863820E09 +++$+++ Hi Brotha Timothy, have a Happy New Year's my friend and let us remain as brothers! Thanks! Best, -- +++$+++ Hi Brotha Timothy, have a Happy New Year's my friend and let us remain as brothers! Thanks! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 22:37, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
22594 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22593 +++$+++ 22593 +++$+++ 2011-01-01 01:13:00 +++$+++ 1.293873180E09 +++$+++ Thanks for replying back! Always good working with you my friend! Best, -- +++$+++ :Thanks for replying back! Always good working with you my friend! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 01:13, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

284739 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284739 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-06 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.189131600E09 +++$+++ How are yoou?-- +++$+++ How are yoou?--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 19:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
284740 +++$+++ Crestville +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284739 +++$+++ 284739 +++$+++ 2007-09-07 16:10:00 +++$+++ 1.189206600E09 +++$+++ I've just been drfiting really, I've nothing to go at. Hopefully Chuck and Edge will get bored of life and return to us soon.-- +++$+++ :I've just been drfiting really, I've nothing to go at. Hopefully Chuck and Edge will get bored of life and return to us soon.--[[User:Crestville|Crestville]] 16:10, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

546884 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546884 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-02 14:14:00 +++$+++ 1.251926040E09 +++$+++ After only two weeks, you have made an incredible 43 edits to my talk page. And I responded -- even though I told you that I did not have the time to mediate your editing. It's is a shame that you have found my advice to be of no use. My apologies, but enough is enough. It is time for me to [[WP:STICK|drop this stick]]. Good luck. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ After only two weeks, you have made an incredible 43 edits to my talk page. And I responded -- even though I told you that I did not have the time to mediate your editing. It's is a shame that you have found my advice to be of no use. My apologies, but enough is enough. It is time for me to [[WP:STICK|drop this stick]]. Good luck. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
546885 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546884 +++$+++ 546884 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 15:07:00 +++$+++ 1.251929220E09 +++$+++ Ok dont mediate but don't tell me to go to the talkpage for adding two sentences while AC ads tons of texts and deleted and changed the things I added without going to the talkpage, without you doing anything. Just so you know AC added some stuff that you said was copyright violation before and put them in quotation marks: \"Egypt was a planetary distance from the small villages of the Druze\" -- +++$+++ :Ok dont mediate but don't tell me to go to the talkpage for adding two sentences while AC ads tons of texts and deleted and changed the things I added without going to the talkpage, without you doing anything. Just so you know AC added some stuff that you said was copyright violation before and put them in quotation marks: "Egypt was a planetary distance from the small villages of the Druze" --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 15:07, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
546886 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546884 +++$+++ 546885 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 15:17:00 +++$+++ 1.251929820E09 +++$+++ Number 44. Your welcome. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::Number 44. Your welcome. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 15:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

22597 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22597 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-07 23:24:00 +++$+++ 1.297149840E09 +++$+++ Hi BrotherTimothy, please join this project, if you will. I want you to, and we need you also. Thanks! Best, -- +++$+++ Hi BrotherTimothy, please join this project, if you will. I want you to, and we need you also. Thanks! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 23:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
22598 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22597 +++$+++ 22597 +++$+++ 2011-02-07 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.297150980E09 +++$+++ Thanks my friend! Best, -- +++$+++ :Thanks my friend! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 23:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
22599 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22597 +++$+++ 22598 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 01:38:00 +++$+++ 1.297157880E09 +++$+++ You've not signed yet! Best, -- +++$+++ ::You've not signed yet! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 01:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
22600 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22597 +++$+++ 22599 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.297224960E09 +++$+++ Click on the above link, then scroll on down to where it says '''Particpants''', click on the edit button, then put your username in underneath FrickFrack's. Then this makes us all '''''the official''''' editors on all [[The Supremes]] and Supremes-related articles! Thanks! Best, -- +++$+++ :::Click on the above link, then scroll on down to where it says '''Particpants''', click on the edit button, then put your username in underneath FrickFrack's. Then this makes us all '''''the official''''' editors on all [[The Supremes]] and Supremes-related articles! Thanks! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 20:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
22601 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22597 +++$+++ 22600 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 20:19:00 +++$+++ 1.297225140E09 +++$+++ Oh, I see you're a member of three other WikiProjects as well! Best, -- +++$+++ ::::Oh, I see you're a member of three other WikiProjects as well! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 20:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

284742 +++$+++ Fifty7 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284742 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-10 14:54:00 +++$+++ 1.189461240E09 +++$+++ Hey, sorry about removing the Drum Major Institute info. That was a mistake, made trying to combat the recent constant vandalism I'm sure you're growing tired of as well.  +++$+++ Hey, sorry about removing the Drum Major Institute info. That was a mistake, made trying to combat the recent constant vandalism I'm sure you're growing tired of as well. [[User:Fifty7|Fifty7]] 14:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
284743 +++$+++ Fifty7 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284742 +++$+++ 284742 +++$+++ 2007-09-11 02:23:00 +++$+++ 1.189502580E09 +++$+++ Oh, no, I don't. I thought I had removed it during the vandalism reverts.  +++$+++ :Oh, no, I don't. I thought I had removed it during the vandalism reverts. [[User:Fifty7|Fifty7]] 02:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

546887 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546887 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-01 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.251817800E09 +++$+++ You might want to take a look at this text that AC has recently added: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Omar_Sharif&diff=311065654&oldid=311027382 \"Life outside of Egypt gave him glory, but a lot of loneliness and a lot of missing his own people and his own country\" This is almost exact as the source: 06.10 http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=gYD0LTKaFc4&feature=related -- +++$+++ You might want to take a look at this text that AC has recently added: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Omar_Sharif&diff=311065654&oldid=311027382 "Life outside of Egypt gave him glory, but a lot of loneliness and a lot of missing his own people and his own country" This is almost exact as the source: 06.10 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYD0LTKaFc4&feature=related --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 08:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
546888 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546887 +++$+++ 546887 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 08:17:00 +++$+++ 1.251818220E09 +++$+++ I'll take a look when I have a moment. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :I'll take a look when I have a moment. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 08:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
546889 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546887 +++$+++ 546888 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 11:13:00 +++$+++ 1.251828780E09 +++$+++ Wow. Great interview. Sharif is remarkable. As far as the entry, this was easily remedied with a slight edit and quotation marks. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::Wow. Great interview. Sharif is remarkable. As far as the entry, this was easily remedied with a slight edit and quotation marks. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 11:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
546890 +++$+++ MLauba +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546887 +++$+++ 546887 +++$+++ 2009-09-01 21:44:00 +++$+++ 1.251866640E09 +++$+++ Best,  +++$+++ :Best, [[User:MLauba|MLauba]] ([[User talk:MLauba|talk]]) 21:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
546891 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546887 +++$+++ 546890 +++$+++ 2009-09-02 08:23:00 +++$+++ 1.251904980E09 +++$+++ Thanks, MLauba, for the assist here. Cheekypeek, all the links and advice offered by MLauba should help you solve any issues. Good luck. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::Thanks, MLauba, for the assist here. Cheekypeek, all the links and advice offered by MLauba should help you solve any issues. Good luck. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 08:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

22602 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22602 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-27 02:14:00 +++$+++ 1.298801640E09 +++$+++ Interesting, hmm? Best, -- +++$+++ Interesting, hmm? Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 02:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
22603 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22602 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 10:38:00 +++$+++ 1.298831880E09 +++$+++ I have two dates for Anna's birth, the one you have listed as 12 Dec 1921, and one for 7 Mar 1922. We also need George Gordy's birth date. I noticed you kept silent on mentioning Denise Gordy and Marvin Gaye being the parents of Anna's son, intersting! Best, -- +++$+++ ::I have two dates for Anna's birth, the one you have listed as 12 Dec 1921, and one for 7 Mar 1922. We also need George Gordy's birth date. I noticed you kept silent on mentioning Denise Gordy and Marvin Gaye being the parents of Anna's son, intersting! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 10:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
22604 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22602 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 10:39:00 +++$+++ 1.298831940E09 +++$+++ Oh, click on this link [http:\/\/www.findagrave.com\/cgi-bin\/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=40676238 Gordy family] Best, -- +++$+++ :::Oh, click on this link [http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=40676238 Gordy family] Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 10:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
22605 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22602 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 22:08:00 +++$+++ 1.298873280E09 +++$+++ Skyler (\"SkyBlu\") Gordy  of [[LMFAO (group)|LMFAO]] is the son of one of [[Berry Gordy]]'s three brothers, but which one, do you know? Best, -- +++$+++ ::::Skyler ("SkyBlu") Gordy  of [[LMFAO (group)|LMFAO]] is the son of one of [[Berry Gordy]]'s three brothers, but which one, do you know? Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 22:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
22606 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22602 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-02-27 22:33:00 +++$+++ 1.298874780E09 +++$+++ Well, I've found that ''[[USA Today]]'' newspaper shows that Berry Gordy IV is his father, so that makes SkyBlue [[Berry Gordy]]'s grandson. Though how accurate this is, I'm not sure. Best, -- +++$+++ :::::Well, I've found that ''[[USA Today]]'' newspaper shows that Berry Gordy IV is his father, so that makes SkyBlue [[Berry Gordy]]'s grandson. Though how accurate this is, I'm not sure. Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 22:33, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

265911 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265911 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-03 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.165197720E09 +++$+++ In the past it has seemed as though the pro-link editors listened only to each other.  I hope that will change.  I wouldn't get too worried.  I think the community has spoken quite clearly in the mediation, even if the two sides have not agreed.  Sincerely, -- +++$+++ In the past it has seemed as though the pro-link editors listened only to each other.  I hope that will change.  I wouldn't get too worried.  I think the community has spoken quite clearly in the mediation, even if the two sides have not agreed.  Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
265912 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265911 +++$+++ 265911 +++$+++ 2006-12-03 18:38:00 +++$+++ 1.165199880E09 +++$+++ Hi Mattisse.  In the short run, negative language can harm the reputation of the person at whom it is directed.  In the long run, the community learns who is making positive contributions, and who is being disruptive.  Negative comments can then boomerang upon their maker.  If you can, please try to not let negative comments ruin your day.  Negativity is the concern of the whole community.  I think that in time, if you continue to make the positive contributions that you do, the community will grow weary of the negative comments toward you, and will take corrective action.  Please have a good day. Sincerely, -- +++$+++ :Hi Mattisse.  In the short run, negative language can harm the reputation of the person at whom it is directed.  In the long run, the community learns who is making positive contributions, and who is being disruptive.  Negative comments can then boomerang upon their maker.  If you can, please try to not let negative comments ruin your day.  Negativity is the concern of the whole community.  I think that in time, if you continue to make the positive contributions that you do, the community will grow weary of the negative comments toward you, and will take corrective action.  Please have a good day. Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 18:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
265913 +++$+++ BostonMA +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265911 +++$+++ 265912 +++$+++ 2006-12-03 19:14:00 +++$+++ 1.165202040E09 +++$+++ Your serenity comes first.  My wish is that the actions of a few editors would not disturb your serenity.  But if it does, I am sorry.  Please take care.  -- +++$+++ ::Your serenity comes first.  My wish is that the actions of a few editors would not disturb your serenity.  But if it does, I am sorry.  Please take care.  --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 19:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

546893 +++$+++ Rowdy the Ant +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546893 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-03 01:30:00 +++$+++ 1.251966600E09 +++$+++ Yes, I know it sounds crazy but I got unblocked. I asked an Admin on the IRC if can please edit again. I was just wondering if you could adopt me. Also, Congrats on the adminship.  +++$+++ Yes, I know it sounds crazy but I got unblocked. I asked an Admin on the IRC if can please edit again. I was just wondering if you could adopt me. Also, Congrats on the adminship. [[User:Rowdy the Ant|Rowdy the Ant]] ([[User talk:Rowdy the Ant|talk]]) 01:30, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546894 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546893 +++$+++ 546893 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 07:44:00 +++$+++ 1.251989040E09 +++$+++ Then drop a note onto their talk page and ask them just like you asked me. (Remember to ask only one at a time). Also tell them a little bit about the topics or Wikipedia area that you are interested in. If they have any questions about your block, you can always refer them to me. Good luck with the editing. Let me know when you have found an adopter. Cheers. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Then drop a note onto their talk page and ask them just like you asked me. (Remember to ask only one at a time). Also tell them a little bit about the topics or Wikipedia area that you are interested in. If they have any questions about your block, you can always refer them to me. Good luck with the editing. Let me know when you have found an adopter. Cheers. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 07:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546895 +++$+++ Rowdy the Ant +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546893 +++$+++ 546894 +++$+++ 2009-09-04 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.252098240E09 +++$+++ I'll take a look at the adoption people you suggested. Sorry about the image problem, I really didn't know.  +++$+++ ::I'll take a look at the adoption people you suggested. Sorry about the image problem, I really didn't know. [[User:Rowdy the Ant|Rowdy the Ant]] ([[User talk:Rowdy the Ant|talk]]) 14:04, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
546896 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546893 +++$+++ 546895 +++$+++ 2009-09-04 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.252098720E09 +++$+++ No problem. There is a lot to learn -- I'm still learning all the time. Just remember to ask if you are uncertain. Good luck with with the adoption. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::No problem. There is a lot to learn -- I'm still learning all the time. Just remember to ask if you are uncertain. Good luck with with the adoption. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:12, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

396984 +++$+++ SlimVirgin +++$+++ Edward +++$+++ 396984 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-12 20:47:00 +++$+++ 1.302666420E09 +++$+++ Hi Edward, I've posted an RfC at [[Talk:Roger Scruton]]\u2014see [[Talk:Roger_Scruton#RfC:_Neutrality_check_at_Roger_Scruton|here]]\u2014to ask whether the neutrality tag should remain on the article. There are a number of issues in dispute; if you could comment even on just one of them, or your overall impression of the article's balance, that would be very helpful. I'm leaving this note because you've edited the article or talk page, but if you have no interest in commenting, please feel free to ignore the request. Cheers, <font color=\"black\"> +++$+++ Hi Edward, I've posted an RfC at [[Talk:Roger Scruton]]—see [[Talk:Roger_Scruton#RfC:_Neutrality_check_at_Roger_Scruton|here]]—to ask whether the neutrality tag should remain on the article. There are a number of issues in dispute; if you could comment even on just one of them, or your overall impression of the article's balance, that would be very helpful. I'm leaving this note because you've edited the article or talk page, but if you have no interest in commenting, please feel free to ignore the request. Cheers, <font color="black">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="gold">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|TALK|]]</font><font color="lime">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|CONTRIBS]]</font></sup></small> 20:47, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
396985 +++$+++ Edward +++$+++ Edward +++$+++ 396984 +++$+++ 396984 +++$+++ 2011-04-12 21:45:00 +++$+++ 1.302669900E09 +++$+++ My only edit to the article was turning [[Institute of Economic Affairs]] into a link, I don't get involved with questions of neutrality. Thanks for letting me know.  +++$+++ : My only edit to the article was turning [[Institute of Economic Affairs]] into a link, I don't get involved with questions of neutrality. Thanks for letting me know. [[User:Edward|Edward]] ([[User talk:Edward#top|talk]]) 21:45, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

22610 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22610 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-03-18 22:04:00 +++$+++ 1.300511040E09 +++$+++ Can you do some research on this, and find out if [[Theo Peoples]] is indeed out of the Four Tops? Thanks! Best, -- +++$+++ Can you do some research on this, and find out if [[Theo Peoples]] is indeed out of the Four Tops? Thanks! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 22:04, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
22611 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22610 +++$+++ 22610 +++$+++ 2011-05-05 19:40:00 +++$+++ 1.304649600E09 +++$+++ Hi my friend! I've got a super big request to ask of you, and that concerns an article creation of [[Spike Deleon]], if you'd be intersted that is. To my understanding, this is not even his real name, though as good as an article creator you are, I'm sure you can figure out what to do with this and the spelling of his last name. With [[Theo Peoples]] now out of the group, I think it's best that we continue with links for all the rest of the Four Tops members. Thanks! Best, -- +++$+++ :Hi my friend! I've got a super big request to ask of you, and that concerns an article creation of [[Spike Deleon]], if you'd be intersted that is. To my understanding, this is not even his real name, though as good as an article creator you are, I'm sure you can figure out what to do with this and the spelling of his last name. With [[Theo Peoples]] now out of the group, I think it's best that we continue with links for all the rest of the Four Tops members. Thanks! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 19:40, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
22612 +++$+++ Discographer +++$+++ BrothaTimothy +++$+++ 22610 +++$+++ 22611 +++$+++ 2011-05-05 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.304649780E09 +++$+++ Thanks! Best, -- +++$+++ ::Thanks! Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 19:43, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

489579 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489579 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-12-14 06:07:00 +++$+++ 1.229263620E09 +++$+++ I've been aware of the situation for a while, an currently it is at informal mediation with no sign of any progress being made. Would the next step be RFC or AN\/I? Wherever the issue is raised, I'd say that all three should be given a fairly short ban from editing the page for any reason, including vandalism (say one month), with a one year block for violation of said ban. They would be allowed to communicate via the article talk page if they had any concerns over the article. That would allow enough time for other editors to work on the article secure in the knowledge that they are not going to be reverted by one of the three belligerents.   +++$+++ I've been aware of the situation for a while, an currently it is at informal mediation with no sign of any progress being made. Would the next step be RFC or AN/I? Wherever the issue is raised, I'd say that all three should be given a fairly short ban from editing the page for any reason, including vandalism (say one month), with a one year block for violation of said ban. They would be allowed to communicate via the article talk page if they had any concerns over the article. That would allow enough time for other editors to work on the article secure in the knowledge that they are not going to be reverted by one of the three belligerents.  [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 06:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
489580 +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489579 +++$+++ 489579 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 06:54:00 +++$+++ 1.229266440E09 +++$+++ If you want my personal opinion, based on a quick reading, I'd say that it's a replica based off the original designs.  60163 wasn't built on the same production line or with the same tooling as the original 49 locomotives.  I'd have to investigate the article further and look into the edit histories of the users involved, and since it's nearly 1 AM here, it's probably too late for me to even try.  -- +++$+++ : If you want my personal opinion, based on a quick reading, I'd say that it's a replica based off the original designs.  60163 wasn't built on the same production line or with the same tooling as the original 49 locomotives.  I'd have to investigate the article further and look into the edit histories of the users involved, and since it's nearly 1 AM here, it's probably too late for me to even try.  --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 06:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
489581 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489579 +++$+++ 489580 +++$+++ 2008-12-14 08:06:00 +++$+++ 1.229270760E09 +++$+++ Thanks for you comments. As I stated on the talk page, according to [[WP:V]], ''Tornado'' is a class member. [[WP:NPOV]] requires that disputed claims are reported on from both sides of the dispute, does it not? Therefore the text should reflect that some are of the opinion that ''Tornado'' is a class member, and some are of the opinion that it is a replica. The issue is not so urgent that it requires immediate action, but something needs to be done within the next 24-48 hours to break the impasse. I merely replaced a section refimprove tag with a general refimprove tag, as more than one section needs refs improving. I did consider removing the disputed tag, but decided not to as I would most likely antagonise at least one of the three involved editors. Your comments as to why you consider the locomotive to be a replica are valid ones, and I can see that side of the arguement. I have pointed both mediators to the article talk page so they can see the discussion and suggestions made.  +++$+++ ::Thanks for you comments. As I stated on the talk page, according to [[WP:V]], ''Tornado'' is a class member. [[WP:NPOV]] requires that disputed claims are reported on from both sides of the dispute, does it not? Therefore the text should reflect that some are of the opinion that ''Tornado'' is a class member, and some are of the opinion that it is a replica. The issue is not so urgent that it requires immediate action, but something needs to be done within the next 24-48 hours to break the impasse. I merely replaced a section refimprove tag with a general refimprove tag, as more than one section needs refs improving. I did consider removing the disputed tag, but decided not to as I would most likely antagonise at least one of the three involved editors. Your comments as to why you consider the locomotive to be a replica are valid ones, and I can see that side of the arguement. I have pointed both mediators to the article talk page so they can see the discussion and suggestions made. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 08:06, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
489582 +++$+++ Mjroots +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489579 +++$+++ 489581 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 06:22:00 +++$+++ 1.229437320E09 +++$+++ Thanks for your honesty over this. I'll ask another admin.  +++$+++ :::Thanks for your honesty over this. I'll ask another admin. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 06:22, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
489583 +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489579 +++$+++ 489582 +++$+++ 2008-12-16 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.229437740E09 +++$+++ Actually, I'm not really much of an honest person.  In fact, the off-Wikipedia incident that prompted my message convinced me that I'm a pretty damn selfish person, and that my bad temper makes me unsuitable for doing anything that requires getting along with other people.  (I think other Wikipedia editors found this out about me some time ago, so who am I kidding?)  I mainly told you this so I wouldn't let a bad situation get worse.  -- +++$+++ :::: Actually, I'm not really much of an honest person.  In fact, the off-Wikipedia incident that prompted my message convinced me that I'm a pretty damn selfish person, and that my bad temper makes me unsuitable for doing anything that requires getting along with other people.  (I think other Wikipedia editors found this out about me some time ago, so who am I kidding?)  I mainly told you this so I wouldn't let a bad situation get worse.  --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 06:29, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
489584 +++$+++ JzG +++$+++ Elkman +++$+++ 489579 +++$+++ 489582 +++$+++ 2008-12-17 14:19:00 +++$+++ 1.229552340E09 +++$+++ Well, that displays some self-knowledge and a degree of honesty, so don't give up just yet, eh? <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]<\/b> <small>( +++$+++ :::: Well, that displays some self-knowledge and a degree of honesty, so don't give up just yet, eh? <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 14:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

284756 +++$+++ Jersyko +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284756 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-18 03:42:00 +++$+++ 1.190112120E09 +++$+++ Well there you are in the Washington Post, fighting the good fight.  Carry on, Tvoz :) '''\xb7 <font color=\"#70A070\"> +++$+++ Well there you are in the Washington Post, fighting the good fight.  Carry on, Tvoz :) '''· <font color="#70A070">[[User:Jersyko|jersyko]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' 03:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
284757 +++$+++ Knulclunk +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284756 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-18 04:07:00 +++$+++ 1.190113620E09 +++$+++ Very nice. :)  -- +++$+++ ::Very nice. :)  --[[User:Knulclunk|Knulclunk]] 04:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

284758 +++$+++ Wasted Time R +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284758 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-18 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.190151960E09 +++$+++ Hey, Tvoz, congrats on the Wapo article!  A while back [http:\/\/techpresident.com\/node\/182 I too got interviewed], in conjunction with the HRC article ... for a blog that has about 1\/100000 the readership of the Post ;-)    +++$+++ Hey, Tvoz, congrats on the Wapo article!  A while back [http://techpresident.com/node/182 I too got interviewed], in conjunction with the HRC article ... for a blog that has about 1/100000 the readership of the Post ;-)   [[User:Wasted Time R|Wasted Time R]] 14:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
284759 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284758 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 23:32:00 +++$+++ 1.190356320E09 +++$+++ I added your interview to the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia in blogs]] page, Wasted. You were able to get a lot more words in there than I was! <strong> +++$+++ :::I added your interview to the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia in blogs]] page, Wasted. You were able to get a lot more words in there than I was! <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 23:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

546904 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-03 15:44:00 +++$+++ 1.252017840E09 +++$+++ I've deleted two but probably for the wrong reasons (what should I do about them? [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:DeletedContributions\/Camille_Marino]. I see I used the same F11 that MBisbanz did, but it looks wrong. Still left is [[:File:Warwakstoned.JPG]] - I think it's pretty obvious these should be deleted but can't find the guidelines that make this clear. The editor is offline at the moment but if she doesn't stop...  +++$+++ I've deleted two but probably for the wrong reasons (what should I do about them? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:DeletedContributions/Camille_Marino]. I see I used the same F11 that MBisbanz did, but it looks wrong. Still left is [[:File:Warwakstoned.JPG]] - I think it's pretty obvious these should be deleted but can't find the guidelines that make this clear. The editor is offline at the moment but if she doesn't stop... [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 15:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546905 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 15:54:00 +++$+++ 1.252018440E09 +++$+++ I actually asked Stifle about something like a couple of weeks ago. From what I read, the rules for images don't work the same way as text. In that there is not a lot of actual speedy deletion -- meaning automatic. They are tagged and then allowed to wait for 7 days. If uploaded again, the same procedure ensues. So as far as the picture goes, I would think that retagging is the only solution at the moment. But the text \"about being stoned\" is a different matter. That's a BLP violation if not sourced to independent RS. I think that needs to be removed now and the uploader warned about BLP vios. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :I actually asked Stifle about something like a couple of weeks ago. From what I read, the rules for images don't work the same way as text. In that there is not a lot of actual speedy deletion -- meaning automatic. They are tagged and then allowed to wait for 7 days. If uploaded again, the same procedure ensues. So as far as the picture goes, I would think that retagging is the only solution at the moment. But the text "about being stoned" is a different matter. That's a BLP violation if not sourced to independent RS. I think that needs to be removed now and the uploader warned about BLP vios. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 15:54, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546906 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 546905 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 17:29:00 +++$+++ 1.252024140E09 +++$+++ That only applies to certain deletion reasons, see [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion]] - eg clear copyright violations can be deleted immediately. I think there's a problem here -- eg a hoax image defaming a real person, I wouldn't hesitate to delete it. I also think somewhere there's something about images of people. Of course, there is always [[WP:IAR]].  +++$+++ ::That only applies to certain deletion reasons, see [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion]] - eg clear copyright violations can be deleted immediately. I think there's a problem here -- eg a hoax image defaming a real person, I wouldn't hesitate to delete it. I also think somewhere there's something about images of people. Of course, there is always [[WP:IAR]]. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 17:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546907 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 546906 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 17:46:00 +++$+++ 1.252025160E09 +++$+++ Hi. Doug asked my feedback. I think the policy here would be [[WP:BLP]]: \"Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced\u2014whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable\u2014should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.... This policy applies equally to biographies of living persons and to biographical material about living persons on other pages.\" I see two options for the remaining image, which makes unsourced allegations about a living individual (certainly intentional, as supported by [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Dave_Warwak&diff=311595924&oldid=311594350]): we can move it to a neutral name or we can pull the plug. Since I'm just offering feedback, I'll leave it to Doug to figure out which is more appropriate. -- +++$+++ :::Hi. Doug asked my feedback. I think the policy here would be [[WP:BLP]]: "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.... This policy applies equally to biographies of living persons and to biographical material about living persons on other pages." I see two options for the remaining image, which makes unsourced allegations about a living individual (certainly intentional, as supported by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dave_Warwak&diff=311595924&oldid=311594350]): we can move it to a neutral name or we can pull the plug. Since I'm just offering feedback, I'll leave it to Doug to figure out which is more appropriate. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 17:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546908 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 546906 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 17:48:00 +++$+++ 1.252025280E09 +++$+++ (ec)You're right that there are some \"instant\" criteria for deletions files -- but the majority fall in a gray zone, even more so than text articles. But that file is a BLP problem (I think the line you are looking for is [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Images]]). I think it should be deleted as an unsourced attack. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::: (ec)You're right that there are some "instant" criteria for deletions files -- but the majority fall in a gray zone, even more so than text articles. But that file is a BLP problem (I think the line you are looking for is [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Images]]). I think it should be deleted as an unsourced attack. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 17:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546909 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 546906 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 17:49:00 +++$+++ 1.252025340E09 +++$+++ Thanks, Mrg. Sorry about the ec. I agree with you. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::: Thanks, Mrg. Sorry about the ec. I agree with you. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 17:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546910 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 546909 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 17:56:00 +++$+++ 1.252025760E09 +++$+++ Consensus is a beautiful thing. :D -- +++$+++ ::::Consensus is a beautiful thing. :D --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 17:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546911 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 546910 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 18:25:00 +++$+++ 1.252027500E09 +++$+++ Doug, I hope you don't mind, but I went ahead and deleted this as a CSD G10 [[Wikipedia:Attack page]] -- especially in light of the uploader's previous warnings for adding defamatory material to that article. (I recalled you were in that big much-ado-about-nothing with the deleting images and blocking recently. So if there is any flak about this, I'll take it.) <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::::Doug, I hope you don't mind, but I went ahead and deleted this as a CSD G10 [[Wikipedia:Attack page]] -- especially in light of the uploader's previous warnings for adding defamatory material to that article. (I recalled you were in that big much-ado-about-nothing with the deleting images and blocking recently. So if there is any flak about this, I'll take it.) <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 18:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546912 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 546911 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.252028820E09 +++$+++ Great, thanks. I am having real problems with your talk page, by the way. At times there are no 'edit' links, and just now there are edit links but the page is too wide<s> with no scroll bar.<\/s> It may just be Chrome, which is what I'm using. Thanks also to you, Mrg.  +++$+++ ::::::Great, thanks. I am having real problems with your talk page, by the way. At times there are no 'edit' links, and just now there are edit links but the page is too wide<s> with no scroll bar.</s> It may just be Chrome, which is what I'm using. Thanks also to you, Mrg. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 18:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546913 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 546912 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 18:50:00 +++$+++ 1.252029000E09 +++$+++ Sorry, there is a scroll bar. It's too wide in IE as well but fine in Firefox.  +++$+++ :::::::Sorry, there is a scroll bar. It's too wide in IE as well but fine in Firefox. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 18:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546914 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 546913 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 18:59:00 +++$+++ 1.252029540E09 +++$+++ Oh, no. Of course, I use Firefox, so I have never noticed. But you're right. I just checked in IE and it appears the rounded cornering must be a strange markup. I wonder if this has been going on since I created the page -- I'm surprised no one has mentioned it before. Hmm, I'll have to fix this. Thanks for letting me know. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::::::::Oh, no. Of course, I use Firefox, so I have never noticed. But you're right. I just checked in IE and it appears the rounded cornering must be a strange markup. I wonder if this has been going on since I created the page -- I'm surprised no one has mentioned it before. Hmm, I'll have to fix this. Thanks for letting me know. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 18:59, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546915 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 546914 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 19:02:00 +++$+++ 1.252029720E09 +++$+++ I'm on Firefox, too. Hence, it looks fine to me. Good luck! -- +++$+++ :::::::::I'm on Firefox, too. Hence, it looks fine to me. Good luck! --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 19:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546916 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ 546915 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 19:10:00 +++$+++ 1.252030200E09 +++$+++ Of course! All the cool people use Firefox. But yours is fine IE, too. Eh, I'll just delete the mark-up for now and steal yours tomorrow.  <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::::::::: Of course! All the cool people use Firefox. But yours is fine IE, too. Eh, I'll just delete the mark-up for now and steal yours tomorrow.  <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 19:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
546917 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546904 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-03 19:13:00 +++$+++ 1.252030380E09 +++$+++ Ah, thanks. I use Firefox for everything else, but as I often have 100-150 tabs open in Firefox, it won't cope with Wikipedia too, so I use Chrome for Wikipedia editing. Maybe I should be using Opera 10. :-)  +++$+++ ::::::::::::Ah, thanks. I use Firefox for everything else, but as I often have 100-150 tabs open in Firefox, it won't cope with Wikipedia too, so I use Chrome for Wikipedia editing. Maybe I should be using Opera 10. :-) [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 19:13, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

284761 +++$+++ Pro crast in a tor +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284761 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 07:22:00 +++$+++ 1.190298120E09 +++$+++ Congrats on the article!  I talked to Jose, too, but seems that the [[Mitt Romney]] page I frequent wasn't interesting enough or something.  Maybe he just didn't like my pseudonym, or that he couldn't cast partisan motives because of it? :) Oh, and you may be interested in a similar article in [http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/kirsten-anderson\/wiki-wars_b_61228.html The Huffington Post] last month.  Jose said that he'd been working on his piece when the HuffPo piece came out, and had to delay his article due to it.   +++$+++ Congrats on the article!  I talked to Jose, too, but seems that the [[Mitt Romney]] page I frequent wasn't interesting enough or something.  Maybe he just didn't like my pseudonym, or that he couldn't cast partisan motives because of it? :) Oh, and you may be interested in a similar article in [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kirsten-anderson/wiki-wars_b_61228.html The Huffington Post] last month.  Jose said that he'd been working on his piece when the HuffPo piece came out, and had to delay his article due to it.  [[User:Pro crast in a tor|Pro crast in a tor]] 07:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
284762 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284761 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.190356020E09 +++$+++ I added that article to the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia in blogs]] page. <strong> +++$+++ :::I added that article to the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia in blogs]] page. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 23:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

22618 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22618 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-01-18 15:23:00 +++$+++ 1.295392980E09 +++$+++ This is my discussion page. I'd advise against discussion but if you must, do. I would counsel against the hate mail you so often see. It is not good for people to read that stuff. Have a little restraint, please. If you want to say something nice, I shall be gratified! Most matters can be discussed on the article discussion page. Goodbye. +++$+++ This is my discussion page. I'd advise against discussion but if you must, do. I would counsel against the hate mail you so often see. It is not good for people to read that stuff. Have a little restraint, please. If you want to say something nice, I shall be gratified! Most matters can be discussed on the article discussion page. Goodbye.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 15:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
22619 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22618 +++$+++ 22618 +++$+++ 2011-02-03 02:04:00 +++$+++ 1.296727440E09 +++$+++ I'm leaving my reply on the discussion page for the article. +++$+++ :I'm leaving my reply on the discussion page for the article.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 02:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

284763 +++$+++ KillerChihuahua +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284763 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-20 23:11:00 +++$+++ 1.190355060E09 +++$+++ Outstanding. :-)  +++$+++ Outstanding. :-) [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup> 23:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
284764 +++$+++ Jossi +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284763 +++$+++ 284763 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 23:16:00 +++$+++ 1.190355360E09 +++$+++ Can we have the URL. please?  +++$+++ : Can we have the URL. please? [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 23:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
284765 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284763 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-20 23:27:00 +++$+++ 1.190356020E09 +++$+++ Thanks everyone!  Just doin' my part to make you all look good....<strong> +++$+++ ::::Thanks everyone!  Just doin' my part to make you all look good....<strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 23:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

22620 +++$+++ Maunus +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22620 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-03 12:34:00 +++$+++ 1.296765240E09 +++$+++ Look, I don't know what I did to get on your bad side at Three-age system - whatever it was it wasn't my intention. It is clear that you are a knowledgeable editor who adds valuable and constructive material to the article and I was simply responding to your queries about the relevance of Thomsen, because that is something that I happen to have some knowledge about. I am not interested in turning the page into a warzone and I also am not in the game of trying to dominate the page which I think you may be worrying about. I really prefer to edit peacefully and collaboratively, this does mean sometimes disagreeing with each other's edits, but as long as disagreement is civilly expressed and supported by argument that usually doesn't present a problem but rather a chance for improvement of the ideas of both parts. I sincerely hope that you will keep editing the article, and that bwe can do so by combining our different knowledge backgrounds, because I am sure that the article will become the bnetter for it. Thanks. +++$+++ Look, I don't know what I did to get on your bad side at Three-age system - whatever it was it wasn't my intention. It is clear that you are a knowledgeable editor who adds valuable and constructive material to the article and I was simply responding to your queries about the relevance of Thomsen, because that is something that I happen to have some knowledge about. I am not interested in turning the page into a warzone and I also am not in the game of trying to dominate the page which I think you may be worrying about. I really prefer to edit peacefully and collaboratively, this does mean sometimes disagreeing with each other's edits, but as long as disagreement is civilly expressed and supported by argument that usually doesn't present a problem but rather a chance for improvement of the ideas of both parts. I sincerely hope that you will keep editing the article, and that bwe can do so by combining our different knowledge backgrounds, because I am sure that the article will become the bnetter for it. Thanks.[[User:Maunus|·Maunus·<span class="Unicode">ƛ</span>·]] 12:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
22621 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22620 +++$+++ 22620 +++$+++ 2011-02-03 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.296767580E09 +++$+++ You aren't on my bad side. I don't understand your attacks on my choice, Morgan, and also, your overall assessment of him is not too comprehensible. However I think I have addressed that without butting heads and at the same time expressing my reluctance. Also, I would say, don't pull things out of discussions I have already had. This is an independent discussion. It does not matter who I am. I should not be of interest to you. I don't like being of interest to you. Where I appreciate your inviting me to change your material, I rather doubt you have the tolerance for it. That conclusion is based on your attacks on Morgan and your over-enthusiasm for Thomsen, which really looks like Danish nationalism, but also I think this hot-headed retort is in the same direction. For the Morgan, these \"unreferenced\" things you cite are in fact covered in the [[Ancient Society]] article. It seemed to me you were fishing for reasons not to consider Morgan important. Why would you do that? Are you looking for an excuse to squabble? Well, you aren't in my bad graces - yet. I was hoping to placate you but I see that is not going to be successful. So, I'm just going to come out with it. I don't like what you wrote. Not entirely - I think much of it is probably about the best we can say about Thomsen's contribution. However, you don't pay attention to the fine points. If you follow your own source, Thomsen did not publish that guidebook. It was published pretty much against his will. Moreover, the guidebook also contained a work by another writer. And so on. We need to be precise about these things. Who wrote what when and what did they say. Well what should I do now? First of all I am not currently interested in your other articles so I am not even going to look at them. If they need fixing you have to do it. Second of all now that you have forced my hand I have two choices. I can do something else or continue to work on this article. I used to be quite an article jumper. My feeling now is that you just can't do everything on WP and it is better for me anyway to follow through on what I start. As it is no good trying to appease you I am going to just go ahead and judiciously edit your stuff. I'm not interested in squabbling, only in quality articles. Certainly your perceptions are worthwhile and valid. I'm only going to look at the detail, such as what the source really says. Maybe it won't be a light edit but I will try to be fair about it. I repeat, you are not on my bad side. There is no reason to fear me. So I'm going on with the edit in an equitable manner I hope. People generally do disagree and contend. So, let's just go on. This discussion here will get deleted by me at some point. The history of my contentions is not of much interest to me. I like to settle up and keep the slate clean, if that is at all possible. +++$+++ :You aren't on my bad side. I don't understand your attacks on my choice, Morgan, and also, your overall assessment of him is not too comprehensible. However I think I have addressed that without butting heads and at the same time expressing my reluctance. Also, I would say, don't pull things out of discussions I have already had. This is an independent discussion. It does not matter who I am. I should not be of interest to you. I don't like being of interest to you. Where I appreciate your inviting me to change your material, I rather doubt you have the tolerance for it. That conclusion is based on your attacks on Morgan and your over-enthusiasm for Thomsen, which really looks like Danish nationalism, but also I think this hot-headed retort is in the same direction. For the Morgan, these "unreferenced" things you cite are in fact covered in the [[Ancient Society]] article. It seemed to me you were fishing for reasons not to consider Morgan important. Why would you do that? Are you looking for an excuse to squabble? Well, you aren't in my bad graces - yet. I was hoping to placate you but I see that is not going to be successful. So, I'm just going to come out with it. I don't like what you wrote. Not entirely - I think much of it is probably about the best we can say about Thomsen's contribution. However, you don't pay attention to the fine points. If you follow your own source, Thomsen did not publish that guidebook. It was published pretty much against his will. Moreover, the guidebook also contained a work by another writer. And so on. We need to be precise about these things. Who wrote what when and what did they say. Well what should I do now? First of all I am not currently interested in your other articles so I am not even going to look at them. If they need fixing you have to do it. Second of all now that you have forced my hand I have two choices. I can do something else or continue to work on this article. I used to be quite an article jumper. My feeling now is that you just can't do everything on WP and it is better for me anyway to follow through on what I start. As it is no good trying to appease you I am going to just go ahead and judiciously edit your stuff. I'm not interested in squabbling, only in quality articles. Certainly your perceptions are worthwhile and valid. I'm only going to look at the detail, such as what the source really says. Maybe it won't be a light edit but I will try to be fair about it. I repeat, you are not on my bad side. There is no reason to fear me. So I'm going on with the edit in an equitable manner I hope. People generally do disagree and contend. So, let's just go on. This discussion here will get deleted by me at some point. The history of my contentions is not of much interest to me. I like to settle up and keep the slate clean, if that is at all possible.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 13:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
22622 +++$+++ Maunus +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22620 +++$+++ 22621 +++$+++ 2011-02-03 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.296769620E09 +++$+++ You continue to speculate about my character, and my motivation: I assure you I am neither a Danish nationalist or an Anti-marxist out to slash Morgan - politically I am a member of the social-democratic party of Denmark, but I am currently in involuntary exile in the US because of certain policies carried out by Danish nationalists in my homeland. What matters though is that I am an anthropologist and that I believe credit should be given where it is due. Morgan was an extremely important figure in early anthropology and the study of prehistory, but he is not the main source of inspiration for the paleo\/neolithic division. Rowley-Conwy is an authority on this subject and I am leaning almost completely on his treatment of the subject - he clearly attributes the invention of the terms paleolithic and neolithic to Lubbock and even though he carefully tracks the premodern roots of the three-age system he does never mention Morgan as inspiration for his work, but rather traces his influences back to Thomsen, Nilsson and Worsaae through the Scotsman Wilson. The guidebook was published by Thomsen and in his name even though he at first was not in agreement with the idea of publishing it - all sources refer to the guidebook as published by him - you will also see this if you read through Rowley-Conwy's book and article.  +++$+++ ::You continue to speculate about my character, and my motivation: I assure you I am neither a Danish nationalist or an Anti-marxist out to slash Morgan - politically I am a member of the social-democratic party of Denmark, but I am currently in involuntary exile in the US because of certain policies carried out by Danish nationalists in my homeland. What matters though is that I am an anthropologist and that I believe credit should be given where it is due. Morgan was an extremely important figure in early anthropology and the study of prehistory, but he is not the main source of inspiration for the paleo/neolithic division. Rowley-Conwy is an authority on this subject and I am leaning almost completely on his treatment of the subject - he clearly attributes the invention of the terms paleolithic and neolithic to Lubbock and even though he carefully tracks the premodern roots of the three-age system he does never mention Morgan as inspiration for his work, but rather traces his influences back to Thomsen, Nilsson and Worsaae through the Scotsman Wilson. The guidebook was published by Thomsen and in his name even though he at first was not in agreement with the idea of publishing it - all sources refer to the guidebook as published by him - you will also see this if you read through Rowley-Conwy's book and article. [[User:Maunus|·Maunus·<span class="Unicode">ƛ</span>·]] 13:47, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
22623 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22620 +++$+++ 22622 +++$+++ 2011-02-03 19:52:00 +++$+++ 1.296791520E09 +++$+++ Your life is your business. For the topic, well, I have to work pretty close to the sources. Just because you claim to be an anthropologist does not give you the priviledge of putting in your own opinions, unless you happen to be an administrator and can force it. Administrators do just as they please around here and if the rest of us don't like it too bad. All I am going to do is check what you say against your sources if I can find those sources. I've already read much of the book you cite. I will evaluate the English but as I say unless it is wrong or contrary to usage it will probably stay. I'm concerned with the organization, as the writing comes from a few different people. That \"headhunted\" stuff has to go. That is not formal English. I can't really say what changes I might make as I do not know myself until I start examining detail. You can see how I work from the preceding sections and from my corrections to the citations. Sometime small stuff is big stuff. Whether the devil is in the detail as the saying goes I do not know, but the quality certainly is. Well whatever it will be I don't intend to press you against your conscience. If you revert or change my changes I will not indulge in an edit war. If I think what you insist on is wrong I may put a tag on it. That will bring it to public attention and someone else can decide. Well the length of this discussion is far greater than the article. Let's go on, but as I say I'm pretty slow. Over time though you will see my changes are significant. Right now I'm pretty busy. I can't just sit down and do the whole thing. +++$+++ :::Your life is your business. For the topic, well, I have to work pretty close to the sources. Just because you claim to be an anthropologist does not give you the priviledge of putting in your own opinions, unless you happen to be an administrator and can force it. Administrators do just as they please around here and if the rest of us don't like it too bad. All I am going to do is check what you say against your sources if I can find those sources. I've already read much of the book you cite. I will evaluate the English but as I say unless it is wrong or contrary to usage it will probably stay. I'm concerned with the organization, as the writing comes from a few different people. That "headhunted" stuff has to go. That is not formal English. I can't really say what changes I might make as I do not know myself until I start examining detail. You can see how I work from the preceding sections and from my corrections to the citations. Sometime small stuff is big stuff. Whether the devil is in the detail as the saying goes I do not know, but the quality certainly is. Well whatever it will be I don't intend to press you against your conscience. If you revert or change my changes I will not indulge in an edit war. If I think what you insist on is wrong I may put a tag on it. That will bring it to public attention and someone else can decide. Well the length of this discussion is far greater than the article. Let's go on, but as I say I'm pretty slow. Over time though you will see my changes are significant. Right now I'm pretty busy. I can't just sit down and do the whole thing.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 19:52, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

396986 +++$+++ Duoduoduo +++$+++ Edward +++$+++ 396986 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-29 14:05:00 +++$+++ 1.304111100E09 +++$+++ So please slow down -- you'll do a good job for Wikipedia if you identify a potential link, and then consider it to see if it's valid, make the link if it's valid, and then go on to the next potential link.  +++$+++ So please slow down -- you'll do a good job for Wikipedia if you identify a potential link, and then consider it to see if it's valid, make the link if it's valid, and then go on to the next potential link. [[User:Duoduoduo|Duoduoduo]] ([[User talk:Duoduoduo|talk]]) 14:05, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
396987 +++$+++ Edward +++$+++ Edward +++$+++ 396986 +++$+++ 396986 +++$+++ 2011-05-04 23:06:00 +++$+++ 1.304575560E09 +++$+++ Thanks. You're right, I've slowed down.  +++$+++ : Thanks. You're right, I've slowed down. [[User:Edward|Edward]] ([[User talk:Edward#top|talk]]) 23:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

22624 +++$+++ Codrinb +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22624 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-07 15:24:00 +++$+++ 1.297121040E09 +++$+++ Hi, do you want to pitch in to this conversation again? I am trying to clarify castra vs castrum once and for all since I am trying to create articles and categories on different castra\/castrum and would like to know how to properly name them. Thanks!   +++$+++ Hi, do you want to pitch in to this conversation again? I am trying to clarify castra vs castrum once and for all since I am trying to create articles and categories on different castra/castrum and would like to know how to properly name them. Thanks!  [[User:Codrinb|Codrin.B]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 15:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
22625 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22624 +++$+++ 22624 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 02:29:00 +++$+++ 1.297160940E09 +++$+++ I revisited and left my remarks. To you I say this: fine, break out articles on different kinds of fortifications. However, don't try to tie it to castra\/castrum, EXCEPT: the word may be qualified with adjectives or adjectival phrases or clauses to designate a specific kind of fortification, which can also be called castra\/castrum. That's fair game. The permanent camp, the marching camps, the naval base, the pale, etc. I would say - but do as you like - first determine what kind of fortification you would like to write about. Then see how the Romans designated the structure. Give it that name. Sounds like an interesting plan. I hope you will be allowed to continue with it. +++$+++ :I revisited and left my remarks. To you I say this: fine, break out articles on different kinds of fortifications. However, don't try to tie it to castra/castrum, EXCEPT: the word may be qualified with adjectives or adjectival phrases or clauses to designate a specific kind of fortification, which can also be called castra/castrum. That's fair game. The permanent camp, the marching camps, the naval base, the pale, etc. I would say - but do as you like - first determine what kind of fortification you would like to write about. Then see how the Romans designated the structure. Give it that name. Sounds like an interesting plan. I hope you will be allowed to continue with it.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 02:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
22626 +++$+++ Codrinb +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22624 +++$+++ 22625 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 18:51:00 +++$+++ 1.297219860E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the reply! Not sure if you noticed the [[Talk:Castra#Rename to Castrum]] thread. There are some clarifying notes there and some updated views from others. My goal is to create articles and categories both on WP and on Commons for the [[List of castra in Dacia|Roman castra in Dacia]] (see also [[:ro:Lista castrelor romane din Rom\xe2nia]] - Romanian version), in a consistent manner. For example, there is a category [[:commons:Category:Potaissa Castrum]] created by someone and I proposed the rename to [[:commons:Category:Castra Potaissa]]. However, after all the discussions on the [[Talk:Castra]] page, I am not sure what the best term would be. Where it makes sense, I would certainly use the name of the place without castra\/castrum. For example [[Porolissum]]. However many castra became settlements with the same names and to differentiate between the two, you need a way to be more specific. For example [[:commons:Category:Potaissa]] has all images related to the settlement\/location and [[:commons:Category:Potaissa Castrum]] is a subcategory, only with the images of the castrum itself. Same thing can happen on WP. So all I wanted to know is whether to use Castrum or Castra for those specific categories, and stick to the right one in the future. Thanks again. Ciao!-- +++$+++ ::Thanks for the reply! Not sure if you noticed the [[Talk:Castra#Rename to Castrum]] thread. There are some clarifying notes there and some updated views from others. My goal is to create articles and categories both on WP and on Commons for the [[List of castra in Dacia|Roman castra in Dacia]] (see also [[:ro:Lista castrelor romane din România]] - Romanian version), in a consistent manner. For example, there is a category [[:commons:Category:Potaissa Castrum]] created by someone and I proposed the rename to [[:commons:Category:Castra Potaissa]]. However, after all the discussions on the [[Talk:Castra]] page, I am not sure what the best term would be. Where it makes sense, I would certainly use the name of the place without castra/castrum. For example [[Porolissum]]. However many castra became settlements with the same names and to differentiate between the two, you need a way to be more specific. For example [[:commons:Category:Potaissa]] has all images related to the settlement/location and [[:commons:Category:Potaissa Castrum]] is a subcategory, only with the images of the castrum itself. Same thing can happen on WP. So all I wanted to know is whether to use Castrum or Castra for those specific categories, and stick to the right one in the future. Thanks again. Ciao!--[[User:Codrinb|Codrin.B]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 18:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
22627 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22624 +++$+++ 22626 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 19:08:00 +++$+++ 1.297220880E09 +++$+++ My opinion in brief: castra predominates, especially with reference to the large bases you are talking about. You didn't ask this and you didn't pick it up from what I said, but there is a bottom line. The question is not what system WP is to use, but what system the Romans used. Suppose you go ahead and institute a system. The bottom line is not what you call the place but what the Romans called it. If you say one thing according to your system and they said something else it will just get argued about and changed. What you need is a footnote giving the source in which it is named. All I am replying is, the English system (or Rumanian system) is useless, whatever that should be, unless you can't find the ancient name. In that case you would use the the official or most popular modern name. I hope I do not tax you with all these words. I tax me, but there seem to be no other way to talk than to talk. Best of luck. +++$+++ :::My opinion in brief: castra predominates, especially with reference to the large bases you are talking about. You didn't ask this and you didn't pick it up from what I said, but there is a bottom line. The question is not what system WP is to use, but what system the Romans used. Suppose you go ahead and institute a system. The bottom line is not what you call the place but what the Romans called it. If you say one thing according to your system and they said something else it will just get argued about and changed. What you need is a footnote giving the source in which it is named. All I am replying is, the English system (or Rumanian system) is useless, whatever that should be, unless you can't find the ancient name. In that case you would use the the official or most popular modern name. I hope I do not tax you with all these words. I tax me, but there seem to be no other way to talk than to talk. Best of luck.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 19:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
22628 +++$+++ Codrinb +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22624 +++$+++ 22627 +++$+++ 2011-02-08 20:14:00 +++$+++ 1.297224840E09 +++$+++ Makes sense! Thanks! -- +++$+++ ::::Makes sense! Thanks! --[[User:Codrinb|Codrin.B]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 20:14, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

284770 +++$+++ E343ll +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284770 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-23 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.190608980E09 +++$+++ It doesn't help Hillary when people think she is lesbian.  +++$+++ It doesn't help Hillary when people think she is lesbian. [[User:E343ll|E343ll]] 21:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
284771 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284770 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-09-23 21:59:00 +++$+++ 1.190609940E09 +++$+++ Responded on this user's talk page, but I have to say thanks for this new addition to what people think I am doing here. <strong> +++$+++ ::Responded on this user's talk page, but I have to say thanks for this new addition to what people think I am doing here. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 21:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

284772 +++$+++ Wasted Time R +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284772 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-23 23:38:00 +++$+++ 1.190615880E09 +++$+++ No, not familiar with Dereks1x actions.  Regarding your previous query about HRC List of controversies section, my plan has been to get HRC article \"complete\" in my mind, bring it to FA nomination, and then see what the FA reviewers think about it.   +++$+++ No, not familiar with Dereks1x actions.  Regarding your previous query about HRC List of controversies section, my plan has been to get HRC article "complete" in my mind, bring it to FA nomination, and then see what the FA reviewers think about it.  [[User:Wasted Time R|Wasted Time R]] 23:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
284773 +++$+++ Wasted Time R +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284772 +++$+++ 284772 +++$+++ 2007-09-26 04:19:00 +++$+++ 1.190805540E09 +++$+++ Hi Tvoz, any cites you want to work on, go for it!  I saw you did a couple that were embedded within long footnotes, I had forgotten those and there are some more, if you do the rest of those that would be great.   +++$+++ :Hi Tvoz, any cites you want to work on, go for it!  I saw you did a couple that were embedded within long footnotes, I had forgotten those and there are some more, if you do the rest of those that would be great.  [[User:Wasted Time R|Wasted Time R]] 04:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

22629 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22629 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-02-24 17:34:00 +++$+++ 1.298597640E09 +++$+++ I made the links in the time-table (lol that sounds wrong) direct to more appropriate sections rather than redirects, as well as adding a little explanation below for the less technically minded. Hope you understand why, and one small reason being links do not print out and for reference that makes it more easily read ''if'' printed, which I assume it may well be by students, and esp. for younger ones still at school.  +++$+++ I made the links in the time-table (lol that sounds wrong) direct to more appropriate sections rather than redirects, as well as adding a little explanation below for the less technically minded. Hope you understand why, and one small reason being links do not print out and for reference that makes it more easily read ''if'' printed, which I assume it may well be by students, and esp. for younger ones still at school. [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 17:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
22630 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22629 +++$+++ 22629 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 19:47:00 +++$+++ 1.298605620E09 +++$+++ Ah - OK -it looks as though it is MY article but actually I just started on it. Come to think of it though I probably am going to inherit it for a while. Articles don't belong to anyone. I had not even thought about changes of the sort you just made. I certainly am not going to complain about it unless on later examination something turn out to be wrong. It's the major improvements I'm looking at now, and I am looking at the whole set. I can only do one or two at a time. I mainly want to fix what was done. You have the kids in mind; I have the general population in mind. We don't want to be too technical for them, but right now accuracy and design are my major concern. I did place my concerns on the article's dicussion page. My new policy is to stick with an article once I start in on it so we will be seeing some results before too long. Thanks. +++$+++ :Ah - OK -it looks as though it is MY article but actually I just started on it. Come to think of it though I probably am going to inherit it for a while. Articles don't belong to anyone. I had not even thought about changes of the sort you just made. I certainly am not going to complain about it unless on later examination something turn out to be wrong. It's the major improvements I'm looking at now, and I am looking at the whole set. I can only do one or two at a time. I mainly want to fix what was done. You have the kids in mind; I have the general population in mind. We don't want to be too technical for them, but right now accuracy and design are my major concern. I did place my concerns on the article's dicussion page. My new policy is to stick with an article once I start in on it so we will be seeing some results before too long. Thanks.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 19:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
22631 +++$+++ Chaosdruid +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22629 +++$+++ 22630 +++$+++ 2011-02-24 22:01:00 +++$+++ 1.298613660E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ ::[[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 22:01, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

284774 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284774 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-24 16:39:00 +++$+++ 1.190677140E09 +++$+++ I just read it, though, and wow! That's great! Let me know if you'd like a paper copy of the article that you can frame. :-) \u2014  +++$+++ I just read it, though, and wow! That's great! Let me know if you'd like a paper copy of the article that you can frame. :-) — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]]) 16:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
284775 +++$+++ Malik Shabazz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284774 +++$+++ 284774 +++$+++ 2007-09-25 01:21:00 +++$+++ 1.190708460E09 +++$+++ Yes, I was serious about the paper copy. I live in DC and get the ''Post'' delivered, and I'm almost certain that I haven't thrown away last week's papers. [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:Emailuser\/Malik_Shabazz E-mail me] and I'll send it to you. \u2014  +++$+++ :Yes, I was serious about the paper copy. I live in DC and get the ''Post'' delivered, and I'm almost certain that I haven't thrown away last week's papers. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Emailuser/Malik_Shabazz E-mail me] and I'll send it to you. — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]]) 01:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

559412 +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ 559412 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-07-30 20:17:00 +++$+++ 1.154315820E09 +++$+++ What is the difference between [[:Category:Knights of the Order of the Bath]] and [[:Category:Knights of the Bath]]?  +++$+++ What is the difference between [[:Category:Knights of the Order of the Bath]] and [[:Category:Knights of the Bath]]? [[User:Joelr31|Joelito]] ([[User talk:Joelr31|talk]]) 20:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
559413 +++$+++ Kittybrewster +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ 559412 +++$+++ 559412 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 20:21:00 +++$+++ 1.154316060E09 +++$+++ [[User:Craigy144]] tells me the former is correct and the latter wrong, so ... please help move them across :-)  -  +++$+++ :[[User:Craigy144]] tells me the former is correct and the latter wrong, so ... please help move them across :-)  - [[User:Kittybrewster|Kittybrewster]] 20:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
559414 +++$+++ Kittybrewster +++$+++ Joelr31 +++$+++ 559412 +++$+++ 559413 +++$+++ 2006-07-30 20:38:00 +++$+++ 1.154317080E09 +++$+++ thank you. learning all the time -  +++$+++ ::thank you. learning all the time - [[User:Kittybrewster|Kittybrewster]] 20:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

22632 +++$+++ Apokryltaros +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-06 16:43:00 +++$+++ 1.302133380E09 +++$+++ Oh, Great Elasmotherine Guru, I humbly beseech thee for advice and recommendations for redrawing the reconstruction currently being used at ''[[Sinotherium]]'' (which I feel is now woefully inadequate and inaccurate).  I also wish to get your advice concerning reconstructing ''Iranotherium'', too.-- +++$+++ Oh, Great Elasmotherine Guru, I humbly beseech thee for advice and recommendations for redrawing the reconstruction currently being used at ''[[Sinotherium]]'' (which I feel is now woefully inadequate and inaccurate).  I also wish to get your advice concerning reconstructing ''Iranotherium'', too.--[[User:Apokryltaros|Mr Fink]] ([[User talk:Apokryltaros|talk]]) 16:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
22633 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ 2011-04-06 17:51:00 +++$+++ 1.302137460E09 +++$+++ Well, I see you have appropriate attitude for addressing me on WP. Ho ho. You wax eloquent. Actually all my research has been on Elasmotherium. I know next to nothing about those other beasts. I can say a couple of things in general about finding out. I find Google, web search, on specifically .pdf very useful; say, Sinotherium on Google web in .pdf. Just the general web returns about 3000 versions of WP and Google books does not have much to say either. The .pdf's have all the journal articles, such as you can get. Don't be afraid to pick the Chinese or Russian ones as they have English translation imbedded (not Google translate). Also, you want the very latest as this is a fast-moving topic. Just in general, Elasmotherium is highly \"derived\"; that is to say, the ancestors don't have any of its main characteristics. They were probably more like the traditional rhino, didn't have much of a horn, were small, were browsers. Beyond that I cannot really say very much because I don't know very much. I prove the concept that even a non-paleontologist can do a paleontology article. This is strictly marginal stuff. The real paleontologists talk the technical lingo of bones and bone surfaces. They sound like medicos. I assumed we would not want to sound like that. So, I dance the dance but I don't talk the talk (I'm glad those days are over). I sort of feel after extensive negative WP experiences (are there any other kind on WP?) that I should bring one article at a time to acceptable condition, which is why I am doing so much on Elasmotherium. I am taking a break from Stone Age. There is a sort of speciousness about these articles. Each one is like a sick man who stands up to say something significant but instead vomits all over the table. So, if you can play the physician for an article or two rather than the assassin I am sure the innocent public looking for real information and not intelligencer lies would appreciate it. Unless I actually write the article I cannot be of much help here. My break is almost over. +++$+++ :Well, I see you have appropriate attitude for addressing me on WP. Ho ho. You wax eloquent. Actually all my research has been on Elasmotherium. I know next to nothing about those other beasts. I can say a couple of things in general about finding out. I find Google, web search, on specifically .pdf very useful; say, Sinotherium on Google web in .pdf. Just the general web returns about 3000 versions of WP and Google books does not have much to say either. The .pdf's have all the journal articles, such as you can get. Don't be afraid to pick the Chinese or Russian ones as they have English translation imbedded (not Google translate). Also, you want the very latest as this is a fast-moving topic. Just in general, Elasmotherium is highly "derived"; that is to say, the ancestors don't have any of its main characteristics. They were probably more like the traditional rhino, didn't have much of a horn, were small, were browsers. Beyond that I cannot really say very much because I don't know very much. I prove the concept that even a non-paleontologist can do a paleontology article. This is strictly marginal stuff. The real paleontologists talk the technical lingo of bones and bone surfaces. They sound like medicos. I assumed we would not want to sound like that. So, I dance the dance but I don't talk the talk (I'm glad those days are over). I sort of feel after extensive negative WP experiences (are there any other kind on WP?) that I should bring one article at a time to acceptable condition, which is why I am doing so much on Elasmotherium. I am taking a break from Stone Age. There is a sort of speciousness about these articles. Each one is like a sick man who stands up to say something significant but instead vomits all over the table. So, if you can play the physician for an article or two rather than the assassin I am sure the innocent public looking for real information and not intelligencer lies would appreciate it. Unless I actually write the article I cannot be of much help here. My break is almost over.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 17:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
22634 +++$+++ Apokryltaros +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ 22633 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 18:35:00 +++$+++ 1.302226500E09 +++$+++ How are you fixed for ''Hispanotherium''?-- +++$+++ ::How are you fixed for ''Hispanotherium''?--[[User:Apokryltaros|Mr Fink]] ([[User talk:Apokryltaros|talk]]) 18:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
22635 +++$+++ Apokryltaros +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ 22633 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 18:39:00 +++$+++ 1.302226740E09 +++$+++ I almost forgot, even more important: Is ''Paraelasmotherium'' a synonym of ''Sinotherium'' or a separate genus?  I've seen it used both ways, and am confused about it.-- +++$+++ ::I almost forgot, even more important: Is ''Paraelasmotherium'' a synonym of ''Sinotherium'' or a separate genus?  I've seen it used both ways, and am confused about it.--[[User:Apokryltaros|Mr Fink]] ([[User talk:Apokryltaros|talk]]) 18:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
22636 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ 22635 +++$+++ 2011-04-07 23:43:00 +++$+++ 1.302244980E09 +++$+++ Page 725 of this [http:\/\/www.rhinoresourcecenter.com\/ref_files\/1245663086.pdf source] from 2008 distinguishes them. It is always best to take the latest article as the classifications change almost year by year. In this case the web sites are pretty much useless. They all skim off WP and each other but no one does any work and since no one knows anything that is what you get, nothing dressed up as something. The books have not caught up with the articles. I'm wondering how long they are going to let us look at the articles for free. I don't know anything about Hispanotherium. I would have to work up the article. If you would want to do any of that go ahead. Or if you think collaboration would help fine. The last case of collaboration seemed to work out; otherwise, I would say collaborators get shot. So, unless by special request my tendency is to get back to the stone age. By the way I did enjoy your art. +++$+++ :::Page 725 of this [http://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/ref_files/1245663086.pdf source] from 2008 distinguishes them. It is always best to take the latest article as the classifications change almost year by year. In this case the web sites are pretty much useless. They all skim off WP and each other but no one does any work and since no one knows anything that is what you get, nothing dressed up as something. The books have not caught up with the articles. I'm wondering how long they are going to let us look at the articles for free. I don't know anything about Hispanotherium. I would have to work up the article. If you would want to do any of that go ahead. Or if you think collaboration would help fine. The last case of collaboration seemed to work out; otherwise, I would say collaborators get shot. So, unless by special request my tendency is to get back to the stone age. By the way I did enjoy your art.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 23:43, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
22637 +++$+++ Apokryltaros +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ 22636 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 01:59:00 +++$+++ 1.302253140E09 +++$+++ Thank you very much!  And I wholeheartedly agree.  If I had a penny for every time I found a crummy carbon copy of a Wikipedia stub page when I attempted to google some obscure fossil taxon, I could buy myself a lifetime subscription to JSTOR.-- +++$+++ ::::Thank you very much!  And I wholeheartedly agree.  If I had a penny for every time I found a crummy carbon copy of a Wikipedia stub page when I attempted to google some obscure fossil taxon, I could buy myself a lifetime subscription to JSTOR.--[[User:Apokryltaros|Mr Fink]] ([[User talk:Apokryltaros|talk]]) 01:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
22638 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ 22637 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 03:20:00 +++$+++ 1.302258000E09 +++$+++ For you and me, well, I am glad I was able to answer some of your questions. I used to be in education long ago. Your art looks pretty good but most of the \"articles\" your pictures are in need a lot of research and writing work. As the portal points out, there are no \"good\" articles there. You seem primarily interested in pictures though. I see you have an article list. I got mine too but I no longer keep it on WP. Why give the idiots an opening? Well, I just can't do everything and neither can you. We see administrators on here that have been on for several years and can't do a citation right. But then, that is not their interest. If any problems arise let me know. Don't be afraid to tag or alter my writing if you think it is warranted. I'm afraid I'm somewhat of a tedious plug but I don't see any other way to get it right. Bye now, and good luck with the articles on your list. I can't stop anyone from probing around in past discussions but if you want to stay on my good side just leave them right where they are. +++$+++ :::::For you and me, well, I am glad I was able to answer some of your questions. I used to be in education long ago. Your art looks pretty good but most of the "articles" your pictures are in need a lot of research and writing work. As the portal points out, there are no "good" articles there. You seem primarily interested in pictures though. I see you have an article list. I got mine too but I no longer keep it on WP. Why give the idiots an opening? Well, I just can't do everything and neither can you. We see administrators on here that have been on for several years and can't do a citation right. But then, that is not their interest. If any problems arise let me know. Don't be afraid to tag or alter my writing if you think it is warranted. I'm afraid I'm somewhat of a tedious plug but I don't see any other way to get it right. Bye now, and good luck with the articles on your list. I can't stop anyone from probing around in past discussions but if you want to stay on my good side just leave them right where they are.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 03:20, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
22639 +++$+++ Apokryltaros +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ 22638 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 03:28:00 +++$+++ 1.302258480E09 +++$+++ Oh, I was just using a figure of speech.  I have several backdoors for getting free JSTOR articles, one of which is simply going back to my old university and mooching off of their library's subscription.  As for WP, I figure that in a few cases, it is possible to have something that is simultaneously a boon and a curse: WP is such a thing, as is chocolate.-- +++$+++ ::::::Oh, I was just using a figure of speech.  I have several backdoors for getting free JSTOR articles, one of which is simply going back to my old university and mooching off of their library's subscription.  As for WP, I figure that in a few cases, it is possible to have something that is simultaneously a boon and a curse: WP is such a thing, as is chocolate.--[[User:Apokryltaros|Mr Fink]] ([[User talk:Apokryltaros|talk]]) 03:28, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
22640 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ 22639 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 03:40:00 +++$+++ 1.302259200E09 +++$+++ OK, you're clear. Chocolate is a good analogy. I always used to complain about the system and then removed myself from the ability to change it by standing outside of it. Not good. I got my nose dislocated once by turning around after an attack in boxing to get out of my opponent's reach. When I turned back again he was waiting. He was really a very nice man, just a better boxer. So, I stay on here and try to improve articles of interest. I would say, any way you can get a free article is a good way. I am sure most authors would agree. Ciao. +++$+++ :::::::OK, you're clear. Chocolate is a good analogy. I always used to complain about the system and then removed myself from the ability to change it by standing outside of it. Not good. I got my nose dislocated once by turning around after an attack in boxing to get out of my opponent's reach. When I turned back again he was waiting. He was really a very nice man, just a better boxer. So, I stay on here and try to improve articles of interest. I would say, any way you can get a free article is a good way. I am sure most authors would agree. Ciao.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 03:40, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
22641 +++$+++ Apokryltaros +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ 22640 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 03:47:00 +++$+++ 1.302259620E09 +++$+++ -- +++$+++ ::::::::--[[User:Apokryltaros|Mr Fink]] ([[User talk:Apokryltaros|talk]]) 03:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
22642 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ 22632 +++$+++ 2011-04-08 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.302287820E09 +++$+++ You got know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em ... +++$+++ :You got know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em ...[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 11:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

284777 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284777 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-09-27 19:20:00 +++$+++ 1.190946000E09 +++$+++ You're quite right that said user could well have been blocked for a month or more. I blocked him for a week simply because I did so before checking his block log. I'd have no objection to you unblocking him and blocking for the duration you'd prefer :).  I think no matter how long he's blocked for, he'll just have to be reblocked when it expires, so the length is more or less irrelevant. Longer is probably better though. - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ You're quite right that said user could well have been blocked for a month or more. I blocked him for a week simply because I did so before checking his block log. I'd have no objection to you unblocking him and blocking for the duration you'd prefer :).  I think no matter how long he's blocked for, he'll just have to be reblocked when it expires, so the length is more or less irrelevant. Longer is probably better though. - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 19:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
284778 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284777 +++$+++ 284777 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.190947020E09 +++$+++ OK, I'll stop being lazy. I've set the block to a more appropriate length. - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ :OK, I'll stop being lazy. I've set the block to a more appropriate length. - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 19:37, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
284779 +++$+++ Nunh-huh +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284777 +++$+++ 284778 +++$+++ 2007-09-27 20:16:00 +++$+++ 1.190949360E09 +++$+++ No, it's not that you were ''suggesting'' it. I ''was'' being lazy :) - <span style=\"font-family: cursive\"> +++$+++ ::No, it's not that you were ''suggesting'' it. I ''was'' being lazy :) - <span style="font-family: cursive">[[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]]</span> 20:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

546925 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546925 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-09 08:38:00 +++$+++ 1.252510680E09 +++$+++ If you want to say something: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case#Asmahan -- +++$+++ If you want to say something: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Asmahan --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 08:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
546926 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546925 +++$+++ 546925 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 08:52:00 +++$+++ 1.252511520E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the notification. I'll take a look, but I believe an arb case it is bit over the top for a content dispute between two editors. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Thanks for the notification. I'll take a look, but I believe an arb case it is bit over the top for a content dispute between two editors. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 08:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
546927 +++$+++ Supreme Deliciousness +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546925 +++$+++ 546926 +++$+++ 2009-09-09 09:15:00 +++$+++ 1.252512900E09 +++$+++ Its not a content dispute, he has changed sections that has previously been agreed during mediation so they go against what was agreed upon and what the sources say.-- +++$+++ ::Its not a content dispute, he has changed sections that has previously been agreed during mediation so they go against what was agreed upon and what the sources say.--[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 09:15, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

507038 +++$+++ Tiptoety +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 507038 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-28 01:19:00 +++$+++ 1.196241540E09 +++$+++ Hi, to my understanding, userpages still fall under speedy criteria due to the fact that they are still classified as a main space, per [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/WP:Speedy_deletion#General_criteria here] and [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Help:Namespace here]. Please correct me if i am wrong. Cheers!  +++$+++ Hi, to my understanding, userpages still fall under speedy criteria due to the fact that they are still classified as a main space, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Speedy_deletion#General_criteria here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Namespace here]. Please correct me if i am wrong. Cheers! [[User:Tiptoety|Tiptoety]] ([[User talk:Tiptoety|talk]]) 01:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
507039 +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 507038 +++$+++ 507038 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 01:28:00 +++$+++ 1.196242080E09 +++$+++ Hmm, it doesn't look like you are wrong at all, I'd never noticed that before. Still, I don't see what good can come out of deleting someone's userpage, unless it's defamatory, used for advertising, etc. I say live and let live, but if you want to re-tag it, I'll let someone else have a look at it. Take care. -- +++$+++ :Hmm, it doesn't look like you are wrong at all, I'd never noticed that before. Still, I don't see what good can come out of deleting someone's userpage, unless it's defamatory, used for advertising, etc. I say live and let live, but if you want to re-tag it, I'll let someone else have a look at it. Take care. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] ([[User talk:Bongwarrior|talk]]) 01:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
507040 +++$+++ Tiptoety +++$+++ Bongwarrior +++$+++ 507038 +++$+++ 507039 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 01:32:00 +++$+++ 1.196242320E09 +++$+++ Okay, just wanted to make sure. Thank you, i have re-tagged it.  +++$+++ ::Okay, just wanted to make sure. Thank you, i have re-tagged it. [[User:Tiptoety|Tiptoety]] ([[User talk:Tiptoety|talk]]) 01:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

546928 +++$+++ Arab Cowboy +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546928 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-10 20:07:00 +++$+++ 1.252638420E09 +++$+++ Cactus, your count is wrong.  I've been blocked 4 times only, not 5 as you claim, one of which is older than 3 months, another was reverted by Xeno for its triviality, another was a clear abuse of admin authority by Tan for contradicting him in a discussion in which he was involved (two more senior admins called his action \"wrong\" and \"foolish\", respectively, and another, which I did not dispute was a biased block by yourself.  I recall at least 2 occasions when SD has been blocked, not just once, maybe one was before he registered a username.  -- +++$+++ Cactus, your count is wrong.  I've been blocked 4 times only, not 5 as you claim, one of which is older than 3 months, another was reverted by Xeno for its triviality, another was a clear abuse of admin authority by Tan for contradicting him in a discussion in which he was involved (two more senior admins called his action "wrong" and "foolish", respectively, and another, which I did not dispute was a biased block by yourself.  I recall at least 2 occasions when SD has been blocked, not just once, maybe one was before he registered a username.  --[[User:Arab Cowboy|Arab Cowboy]] ([[User talk:Arab Cowboy|talk]]) 20:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
546929 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546928 +++$+++ 546928 +++$+++ 2009-09-11 08:30:00 +++$+++ 1.252683000E09 +++$+++ Arab Cowboy, seriously, your comment here only does a disservice to yourself. Please read [[WP:GAME]]. None of your actions which resulted in 5 blocks (yes, I can count) in 3 months (May 26 - Aug 23) was trivial. At this point, I urge you to stop arguing. Instead, take time to reflect on the reasons for the warnings and blocks and to understand the consequences of your own actions, so that you might convince the members of ArbCom that you are willing to act responsibly within the community. There is no need to respond here. It appears the ArbCom will accept SD's case, so you will have opportunity to discuss your history there. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Arab Cowboy, seriously, your comment here only does a disservice to yourself. Please read [[WP:GAME]]. None of your actions which resulted in 5 blocks (yes, I can count) in 3 months (May 26 - Aug 23) was trivial. At this point, I urge you to stop arguing. Instead, take time to reflect on the reasons for the warnings and blocks and to understand the consequences of your own actions, so that you might convince the members of ArbCom that you are willing to act responsibly within the community. There is no need to respond here. It appears the ArbCom will accept SD's case, so you will have opportunity to discuss your history there. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 08:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
546930 +++$+++ Arab Cowboy +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546928 +++$+++ 546929 +++$+++ 2009-09-11 12:41:00 +++$+++ 1.252698060E09 +++$+++ Sorry, it seems that it is I who cannot count.  But I was correct about the dates.  I already reflect on my actions.  I know that I am hot headed, and I know when I deserved the blocks and I did not dispute those blocks when I deserved them, such as yours, Graeme's and CIreland's.  But Tan's was clearly a case of self-service by an admin.  Yours was deserved on my part, but it was biased.  I am still of the opinion that SD deserved an equal block at the time - he was \"equally culpable\" and \"has been\" (present perfect tense) the instigator of all edit wars.  I have offered a '''topic ban''' for both of us and you have not accepted this offer.  He should not come anywhere near Egyptian articles and the same goes to me for Syrian articles.  What more reflection on my action do you expect from me?  Because of your block and Tan's (together with all the bickering that goes on at AN\/I), and your inaction to implement a topic ban to save us all this mess, I have come to conclude that WP is not a fair place.  -- +++$+++ ::Sorry, it seems that it is I who cannot count.  But I was correct about the dates.  I already reflect on my actions.  I know that I am hot headed, and I know when I deserved the blocks and I did not dispute those blocks when I deserved them, such as yours, Graeme's and CIreland's.  But Tan's was clearly a case of self-service by an admin.  Yours was deserved on my part, but it was biased.  I am still of the opinion that SD deserved an equal block at the time - he was "equally culpable" and "has been" (present perfect tense) the instigator of all edit wars.  I have offered a '''topic ban''' for both of us and you have not accepted this offer.  He should not come anywhere near Egyptian articles and the same goes to me for Syrian articles.  What more reflection on my action do you expect from me?  Because of your block and Tan's (together with all the bickering that goes on at AN/I), and your inaction to implement a topic ban to save us all this mess, I have come to conclude that WP is not a fair place.  --[[User:Arab Cowboy|Arab Cowboy]] ([[User talk:Arab Cowboy|talk]]) 12:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
546931 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546928 +++$+++ 546930 +++$+++ 2009-09-11 15:38:00 +++$+++ 1.252708680E09 +++$+++ Both you and SD clearly overestimate the position of administrator. We are not authorities. Administrators are just like any other editor except, because of some added experience, we are entrusted by the community with a couple of extra tools for cleaning up messes and enforcing policy. That is all. You also misunderstand the topic ban. It is not a neat separation between Egyptian and Syrian articles because that still leaves all the Egyptian\/Syrian articles under dispute - and would entail more bickering about whether an article is Egyptian or Syrian. A topic ban from me would also be article specific - meaning neither of you could ever edit any of the articles on which your are currently in dispute. Period. In my opinion, in consideration of the history on both your parts, I very much doubted either of you would have accepted that from a lone administrator. Which would have resulted in more arguing, more blocks, more ANI cases and probably indefinite blocks. I doubt that is what you wanted. I know I didn't want subject the community to an even bigger mess like that. So stop blaming me, stop blaming Tan, stop blaming everyone else -- you and SD have created this entire mess on your own. You both were given ample advice, opportunity and resources to resolve it. You failed. Now the Arbitration Committee on behalf of the entire WP community will need to decide how best to clean it up. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Both you and SD clearly overestimate the position of administrator. We are not authorities. Administrators are just like any other editor except, because of some added experience, we are entrusted by the community with a couple of extra tools for cleaning up messes and enforcing policy. That is all. You also misunderstand the topic ban. It is not a neat separation between Egyptian and Syrian articles because that still leaves all the Egyptian/Syrian articles under dispute - and would entail more bickering about whether an article is Egyptian or Syrian. A topic ban from me would also be article specific - meaning neither of you could ever edit any of the articles on which your are currently in dispute. Period. In my opinion, in consideration of the history on both your parts, I very much doubted either of you would have accepted that from a lone administrator. Which would have resulted in more arguing, more blocks, more ANI cases and probably indefinite blocks. I doubt that is what you wanted. I know I didn't want subject the community to an even bigger mess like that. So stop blaming me, stop blaming Tan, stop blaming everyone else -- you and SD have created this entire mess on your own. You both were given ample advice, opportunity and resources to resolve it. You failed. Now the Arbitration Committee on behalf of the entire WP community will need to decide how best to clean it up. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 15:38, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

284786 +++$+++ SandyGeorgia +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284786 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-14 15:36:00 +++$+++ 1.192401360E09 +++$+++ I saw your note at Raul's page; I should have some time later today to dig back in and do some sample edits; I haven't checked lately, but the referencing was not in good shape when I looked earlier in the week.  It might be good to take some time to clean up those issues before coming back to FAC.  I'll make some sample edits later today to show the things I mean (but then I have travel at the end of the week); as I recall, the bottom of the article used poor quality references and the refs weren't even correctly formatted (this may have changed since I last had a chance to look).  And, unless it's changed since I last looked, there are still sections that could benefit from some trimming. Actually, Ron Paul is in dismal shape and has some alarming supports, so I first need to carve out time to enter a decent Oppose there.  I only got caught up on FAC talk page\/GimmeBot bookkeeping yesterday.  More later,   +++$+++ I saw your note at Raul's page; I should have some time later today to dig back in and do some sample edits; I haven't checked lately, but the referencing was not in good shape when I looked earlier in the week.  It might be good to take some time to clean up those issues before coming back to FAC.  I'll make some sample edits later today to show the things I mean (but then I have travel at the end of the week); as I recall, the bottom of the article used poor quality references and the refs weren't even correctly formatted (this may have changed since I last had a chance to look).  And, unless it's changed since I last looked, there are still sections that could benefit from some trimming. Actually, Ron Paul is in dismal shape and has some alarming supports, so I first need to carve out time to enter a decent Oppose there.  I only got caught up on FAC talk page/GimmeBot bookkeeping yesterday.  More later,  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 15:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
284787 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284786 +++$+++ 284786 +++$+++ 2007-10-16 19:43:00 +++$+++ 1.192588980E09 +++$+++ See [[User talk: 199.44.214.2]] for reply. Actually, see [[Talk: Ronald Reagan]].  <strong> +++$+++ :See [[User talk: 199.44.214.2]] for reply. Actually, see [[Talk: Ronald Reagan]].  <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 19:43, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

22643 +++$+++ Medeis +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22643 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-27 01:42:00 +++$+++ 1.303893720E09 +++$+++ I have no problem at all with your edits, and appreciate the improvements to the article as a whole.  I toned down your caveats, with which I agree - and I hope you see the effect is still the same, if subtler - because they were a big target for ideological reversion so bluntly stated.   +++$+++ I have no problem at all with your edits, and appreciate the improvements to the article as a whole.  I toned down your caveats, with which I agree - and I hope you see the effect is still the same, if subtler - because they were a big target for ideological reversion so bluntly stated.  [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 01:42, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
22644 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22643 +++$+++ 22643 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 01:54:00 +++$+++ 1.303894440E09 +++$+++ No need to pull punches (gentlemanly ones of course), your writing in that case is just plain better than mine. Looks as though we might get a lucky collaboration to get the men out of the cave, Mr. No Man. +++$+++ :No need to pull punches (gentlemanly ones of course), your writing in that case is just plain better than mine. Looks as though we might get a lucky collaboration to get the men out of the cave, Mr. No Man.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 01:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
22645 +++$+++ Medeis +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22643 +++$+++ 22644 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 01:58:00 +++$+++ 1.303894680E09 +++$+++ (!)  Wow, first one to identify my user name!  (''Outis'' was taken.)  +++$+++ ::(!)  Wow, first one to identify my user name!  (''Outis'' was taken.) [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 01:58, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
22646 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22643 +++$+++ 22645 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 02:07:00 +++$+++ 1.303895220E09 +++$+++ No big deal - the Odyssey is a favorite and I can read ancient Greek. I will be moving slowly on this. +++$+++ :::No big deal - the Odyssey is a favorite and I can read ancient Greek. I will be moving slowly on this.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 02:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

546932 +++$+++ Gbern3 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546932 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-10 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.252630800E09 +++$+++ I've spent the past six weeks overhauling the [[hip hop dance]] article and now that I've finished I posted it for peer review [[Wikipedia:Peer review\/Hip hop dance\/archive1|here]]. I decide to invite you because you're member of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|guild of copy editors]]. I know hip-hop dance (the history of) has nothing to do with Danish films\/people but you're a copy editor with a good command of the English language. I figured that was a good enough reason to invite you. I would appreciate your feedback. Be forewarned that this is a long article. Not including refs\/external links, templates, and categories it's 7 pages printed. If you accept my invitation to review you may want to print it first and make your edits that way. I found it easier to read and to correct when I did this. Although long, it makes for a good read during a lunch break, a bus ride, or pure boredom. I learned a lot myself while rewriting this article. Consider this one of those articles you can ''\"wander into relating to [your] experiences as a...\"'' wikipedia administrator. If you like to learn, this could be an incentive for you.  +++$+++ I've spent the past six weeks overhauling the [[hip hop dance]] article and now that I've finished I posted it for peer review [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Hip hop dance/archive1|here]]. I decide to invite you because you're member of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|guild of copy editors]]. I know hip-hop dance (the history of) has nothing to do with Danish films/people but you're a copy editor with a good command of the English language. I figured that was a good enough reason to invite you. I would appreciate your feedback. Be forewarned that this is a long article. Not including refs/external links, templates, and categories it's 7 pages printed. If you accept my invitation to review you may want to print it first and make your edits that way. I found it easier to read and to correct when I did this. Although long, it makes for a good read during a lunch break, a bus ride, or pure boredom. I learned a lot myself while rewriting this article. Consider this one of those articles you can ''"wander into relating to [your] experiences as a..."'' wikipedia administrator. If you like to learn, this could be an incentive for you. [[User:Gbern3|Gbern3]] ([[User talk:Gbern3|talk]]) 18:00, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
546933 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546932 +++$+++ 546932 +++$+++ 2009-09-11 19:55:00 +++$+++ 1.252724100E09 +++$+++ Hi, Gbern3. Thanks for the invitation. I do enjoy learning knew subjects. It certainly does appear to be an impressive bit of work that you have done. I haven't had much time to spare lately -- but if I do get a chance in the next few days, I will take a look. Cheers. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Hi, Gbern3. Thanks for the invitation. I do enjoy learning knew subjects. It certainly does appear to be an impressive bit of work that you have done. I haven't had much time to spare lately -- but if I do get a chance in the next few days, I will take a look. Cheers. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 19:55, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

546934 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546934 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-14 15:01:00 +++$+++ 1.252965660E09 +++$+++ Due to ongoing issues here, I have G6ed the article with a wholly new version written and researched by me. If this deletion of text you wrote isn't uncontroversial, please, by all means restore the history. The new writing, I think, is necessary to put an end to this dispute. I moved the article because the term seems more widely used. -- +++$+++ Due to ongoing issues here, I have G6ed the article with a wholly new version written and researched by me. If this deletion of text you wrote isn't uncontroversial, please, by all means restore the history. The new writing, I think, is necessary to put an end to this dispute. I moved the article because the term seems more widely used. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 15:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
546935 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546934 +++$+++ 546934 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 15:18:00 +++$+++ 1.252966680E09 +++$+++ I think that is a fine solution. Your rewrite is beautiful. The original title always worked for me. It was Dbachman who made the title change because he was worried about synth issues, if I recall -- although I can't quite remember his reasoning. Thanks for dealing with the whole hullabaloo. These kinds of conflicts with people fighting for some personal fame or acknowledgment of their existence through WP always leave me somewhat sad. One of the reasons I don't do as much Afd notability work anymore. Anyway, well done -- until, of course, the sequel: ''The Return Of...''. Yikes!. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :I think that is a fine solution. Your rewrite is beautiful. The original title always worked for me. It was Dbachman who made the title change because he was worried about synth issues, if I recall -- although I can't quite remember his reasoning. Thanks for dealing with the whole hullabaloo. These kinds of conflicts with people fighting for some personal fame or acknowledgment of their existence through WP always leave me somewhat sad. One of the reasons I don't do as much Afd notability work anymore. Anyway, well done -- until, of course, the sequel: ''The Return Of...''. Yikes!. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 15:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
546936 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546934 +++$+++ 546935 +++$+++ 2009-09-14 19:59:00 +++$+++ 1.252983540E09 +++$+++ Happy to help. Whatever happens from here, there are absolutely ''zero'' concerns about plagiarism. :) Continued efforts to include this link can only be perceived as promotion, and I will trot it off to COIN. -- +++$+++ ::Happy to help. Whatever happens from here, there are absolutely ''zero'' concerns about plagiarism. :) Continued efforts to include this link can only be perceived as promotion, and I will trot it off to COIN. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 19:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

22647 +++$+++ Medeis +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22647 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-27 03:45:00 +++$+++ 1.303901100E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 03:45, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
22648 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22647 +++$+++ 22647 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.303939500E09 +++$+++ Oh, was that you? You know, I'm not much one for feuding. These articles are after all collaborative. I like to fix articles that ought to be good but there is something wrong. The mammals article has the tag at the top. But usually it is never a simple fix. There is typically some English work to do. But, unless something is manifestly wrong I don't press the issue. What frosts me is when the admins are manifestly wrong but they are going to do it anyway and call me all the names they object to anyone else calling them. They revert back to their errors. I wish I knew what to do about it except get off the article. If you are looking for praise for that composite photo, you got it. That one is top notch. That has to stay. I will be going through that article line by line mainly with a view of fixing the refs but as I say I work very slow. I should try to speed up. As far as your looking back in my stuff goes, well, I'm against it. Too much notoriety can impede the progress of the articles. Come to think of it I have probably encountered you before. As I say, it is too much bother to make a list of enemies on WP and deliberately go after their articles. In my experience, if I get driven off an article that is manifestly wrong, in a matter of months it gets changed anyway by people bigger and tougher than the admins and editors who drove me off. All I have to do is wait. I got no idea if you were a friend or enemy previously but let's just put that aside. Emphasize the positive, deemphasize the negative. If I ignored you, you should worry because that would mean you were really bad and really bad people always get into trouble elsewhere, standard rule. I have seen so many famous editors have to abandon an identity and adopt a new one. I almost did that myself. I concluded, well, an identity can attract flak just because one is what one is. Everyone has to be someone, you know, but this knowledge is abstract. It is removed from the particular images. You never know to whom you speak. It might be a man sitting in the Vatican or a lifer in a prison. One of the famous English dictionaries was written by a doctor incarcerated in an institution for the criminally insane for murder. He lost control of himself and shot a man with a Colt 44. Civil War veteran, you know. So I decided to downplay my identity. If you are going to go poking around I expect you to behave like a gentleman. For what I may have said in October, frankly I forgot. WP often infuriates a lot of people. However the public it seems is paying to be infuriated, a kind of sado-masochism. We want to be punished for our sins. We seek expiation from the public. Whatever. In any case even friends fight over their work. Well, I'm afraid I'm rambling on. I got so much work to do. Later. +++$+++ :Oh, was that you? You know, I'm not much one for feuding. These articles are after all collaborative. I like to fix articles that ought to be good but there is something wrong. The mammals article has the tag at the top. But usually it is never a simple fix. There is typically some English work to do. But, unless something is manifestly wrong I don't press the issue. What frosts me is when the admins are manifestly wrong but they are going to do it anyway and call me all the names they object to anyone else calling them. They revert back to their errors. I wish I knew what to do about it except get off the article. If you are looking for praise for that composite photo, you got it. That one is top notch. That has to stay. I will be going through that article line by line mainly with a view of fixing the refs but as I say I work very slow. I should try to speed up. As far as your looking back in my stuff goes, well, I'm against it. Too much notoriety can impede the progress of the articles. Come to think of it I have probably encountered you before. As I say, it is too much bother to make a list of enemies on WP and deliberately go after their articles. In my experience, if I get driven off an article that is manifestly wrong, in a matter of months it gets changed anyway by people bigger and tougher than the admins and editors who drove me off. All I have to do is wait. I got no idea if you were a friend or enemy previously but let's just put that aside. Emphasize the positive, deemphasize the negative. If I ignored you, you should worry because that would mean you were really bad and really bad people always get into trouble elsewhere, standard rule. I have seen so many famous editors have to abandon an identity and adopt a new one. I almost did that myself. I concluded, well, an identity can attract flak just because one is what one is. Everyone has to be someone, you know, but this knowledge is abstract. It is removed from the particular images. You never know to whom you speak. It might be a man sitting in the Vatican or a lifer in a prison. One of the famous English dictionaries was written by a doctor incarcerated in an institution for the criminally insane for murder. He lost control of himself and shot a man with a Colt 44. Civil War veteran, you know. So I decided to downplay my identity. If you are going to go poking around I expect you to behave like a gentleman. For what I may have said in October, frankly I forgot. WP often infuriates a lot of people. However the public it seems is paying to be infuriated, a kind of sado-masochism. We want to be punished for our sins. We seek expiation from the public. Whatever. In any case even friends fight over their work. Well, I'm afraid I'm rambling on. I got so much work to do. Later.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 14:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
22649 +++$+++ Medeis +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22647 +++$+++ 22648 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 15:27:00 +++$+++ 1.303943220E09 +++$+++ Please do delete this comment and all the above if you prefer.  But, do check out the book I recommended above, it is beautifully written, has great quotes in the original Greek and Latin, and provides analyses which will be of interest even if you have already read the Loeb Diogenes Laertius.  +++$+++ ::Please do delete this comment and all the above if you prefer.  But, do check out the book I recommended above, it is beautifully written, has great quotes in the original Greek and Latin, and provides analyses which will be of interest even if you have already read the Loeb Diogenes Laertius. [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 15:27, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
22650 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22647 +++$+++ 22649 +++$+++ 2011-04-27 20:30:00 +++$+++ 1.303961400E09 +++$+++ It appears as though we have a lot in common so there must be a commonality somewhere, certainly in education. Education, they say, makes the man. I switched from engineering to classics to get one and that was a purely selfish act. I decided to do something for myself, and that is contrary to our mores. I've had to fight ever since. What's the point of that stuff? Why don't I do something useful? Why classics? Our product is not classics, etc, etc etc. The only way to legitimize the classics was to sell my soul to the devil, and I do mean devil, and that I would not do. Well, I'm not rich. If I were I would not be trying to convince everyone I was a leader in liberal arts also and a spiritual giant and a great guru to the nation when actually I put my pants on one leg at a time trying hard not to deficate. My education was of great value to me. Similar educations were of great value to my forbears. Liberal arts is the study befitting free men. I am a free man, for the benefit of those who have never encountered one. If you are a rich tyrant you are underpriviledged. This point of view starts in classics already. Who is the real slave, the legal slave in control of his passions and intellect, or the master who gratifies every whim of speech and action no matter how demeaning? We can't really discuss this too much without coming out into the open and then we'll never get an objective assessment of these articles. For the book, well, if I can get it without paying a lot of money I will. Don't get me started on booksellers. Anyway good luck. No doubt we'll be collaborating from time to time. +++$+++ :::It appears as though we have a lot in common so there must be a commonality somewhere, certainly in education. Education, they say, makes the man. I switched from engineering to classics to get one and that was a purely selfish act. I decided to do something for myself, and that is contrary to our mores. I've had to fight ever since. What's the point of that stuff? Why don't I do something useful? Why classics? Our product is not classics, etc, etc etc. The only way to legitimize the classics was to sell my soul to the devil, and I do mean devil, and that I would not do. Well, I'm not rich. If I were I would not be trying to convince everyone I was a leader in liberal arts also and a spiritual giant and a great guru to the nation when actually I put my pants on one leg at a time trying hard not to deficate. My education was of great value to me. Similar educations were of great value to my forbears. Liberal arts is the study befitting free men. I am a free man, for the benefit of those who have never encountered one. If you are a rich tyrant you are underpriviledged. This point of view starts in classics already. Who is the real slave, the legal slave in control of his passions and intellect, or the master who gratifies every whim of speech and action no matter how demeaning? We can't really discuss this too much without coming out into the open and then we'll never get an objective assessment of these articles. For the book, well, if I can get it without paying a lot of money I will. Don't get me started on booksellers. Anyway good luck. No doubt we'll be collaborating from time to time.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 20:30, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

546937 +++$+++ Chanakal +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546937 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-15 10:00:00 +++$+++ 1.253034000E09 +++$+++ I'm honoured, CactusWriter! Thank you very much for your kind words and Barnstar. I might be able rewrite the article as I have 2,3 good books on [[Sri Dalada Maligawa]]. I have seen your many tireless copyright violation cleanups. So keep up the good work and kind regards! --<font face=\"calibri\"> +++$+++ I'm honoured, CactusWriter! Thank you very much for your kind words and Barnstar. I might be able rewrite the article as I have 2,3 good books on [[Sri Dalada Maligawa]]. I have seen your many tireless copyright violation cleanups. So keep up the good work and kind regards! --<font face="calibri">[[User:Chanakal|<font color="SteelBlue">'''Chanaka L'''</font>]] (<font color="Coral">[[User talk:Chanakal|talk]]</font>)</font> 10:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
546938 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546937 +++$+++ 546937 +++$+++ 2009-09-15 15:28:00 +++$+++ 1.253053680E09 +++$+++ If you find the time to rewrite the article, than that would be great. Good luck. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :If you find the time to rewrite the article, than that would be great. Good luck. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 15:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

22652 +++$+++ Medeis +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22652 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-04-29 01:10:00 +++$+++ 1.304064600E09 +++$+++ Hi, your edition on the Morgan lines of descent is open to criticism as synthesis and as undue weight.  Not being hostile to your edits I am mentioning this here rather than simply revert you.  Is there direct third party documentation of the family before Morgan's grandfather, and even then, is it relevant to such detail in this article?  I suggest moving the stuff about the speculative Welsh origins to the article [[Morgan (surname)]] and simply linking to it there rather than trying to shoehorn it into this article.   +++$+++ Hi, your edition on the Morgan lines of descent is open to criticism as synthesis and as undue weight.  Not being hostile to your edits I am mentioning this here rather than simply revert you.  Is there direct third party documentation of the family before Morgan's grandfather, and even then, is it relevant to such detail in this article?  I suggest moving the stuff about the speculative Welsh origins to the article [[Morgan (surname)]] and simply linking to it there rather than trying to shoehorn it into this article.  [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 01:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
22653 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22652 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2011-04-29 02:44:00 +++$+++ 1.304070240E09 +++$+++ No, it is NOT open to criticism as synthesis. It is NOT speculative and it is NOT unsourced. Had you reverted it I would have put it back. Did you not check the source? It is readable on Google. The whole history of the Morgan family is given in many pages including the legend and the probably legendary etymology. If that is not enough there are many sources like it. I value your friendship and I appreciate the commonality but your comments are for the most part shallow and insubstantial. I appreciate the fact that you buttered me up first, but they don't cut it. They are the sort of phony, doctored up criticisms of editors looking for an excuse to change something they don't have a reason to change except they wouldn't have done it that way or hassle the editor. In your case I excuse you from the charge of hassling. However, there is a kernel of truth in what you say, which is hidden by the phony critique. I have the passage under only one Morgan when it concerns a good many Morgans. That bothered me a little as I did not see the article to which you refer. I would rather have it here than nowhere. But, now it seems we have another choice. Most of it should go there, I agree. I would say, let's start with the revolutionary war Morgan, the grandfather. You can put the preceding over there if you wish and also adjust the titles here accordingly, if you wish. I like to work on only the articles I like to work on, a few at a time, ideally one at a time, but I get bored with just one. So, I am not going to work on the Morgan name one, at least right now. You can if you like, or just put it over. Or, if you don't want to spend any time on it, stick it in the discussion over there for future synthesis. Now, I am sorry to have to be a bit irritable, but let me give you an example of what you are doing, perhaps unconsciously. I had a lot to do with the [[Battle of Thermopylae]]. It had been a good article but had fallen off and I was trying to fix it. Now, the main source is Herodotus. He is available in full in Wikisource. Do you think any of those idiots would look at a single paragraph of Herodotus? No, far easier to proclaim, this is unsourced, this is original contribution, what is your source on this? Yak yak yak. What a bunch of stupid cackling geese. One quick trip to Wikisource would have cleared up all doubt but do you think anyone would do that? Toward the end the Thebans put up their hands and surrendered, leaving the Spartans to die alone. They just kept questioning me over and over and over, what is your source for the hands up? They could not believe that universal gesture was used even then. Herodotus says very clearly, the Thebans put hands up and were taken into custody. Do you think anyone would bother to look it up? So, I gave in. I put in surrendered or some such thing. I wouldn't do that now. I would say, with me you have to be very careful that what you say is true. If it is I will object to nothing. If it isn't, well, the articles I work on I am usually pretty serious about so I will duke it out. I'm serious about this one. By the way, don't think you are going to get back at me by changing my writing. Go ahead and change it. I only care if you make it wrong or remove it without reason. Between you and me, I encourage you to think about what you say before you say it. People say what they do because they think they are right and therefore whatever they say is right. They go on the presumption of rightness. Excuse me, but that is the road to perdition. Always check out everything you say. Reality testing is tougher than the presumption of rightness but it ends up in a more realistic view. Ciao. I'm just going on working to keep the train of thought so I may not go over what you do for a while but I will go over it. If I seem to disappear it will be because I am taking a break on another article and not because I am in a petulent mood. Ciao. +++$+++ ::No, it is NOT open to criticism as synthesis. It is NOT speculative and it is NOT unsourced. Had you reverted it I would have put it back. Did you not check the source? It is readable on Google. The whole history of the Morgan family is given in many pages including the legend and the probably legendary etymology. If that is not enough there are many sources like it. I value your friendship and I appreciate the commonality but your comments are for the most part shallow and insubstantial. I appreciate the fact that you buttered me up first, but they don't cut it. They are the sort of phony, doctored up criticisms of editors looking for an excuse to change something they don't have a reason to change except they wouldn't have done it that way or hassle the editor. In your case I excuse you from the charge of hassling. However, there is a kernel of truth in what you say, which is hidden by the phony critique. I have the passage under only one Morgan when it concerns a good many Morgans. That bothered me a little as I did not see the article to which you refer. I would rather have it here than nowhere. But, now it seems we have another choice. Most of it should go there, I agree. I would say, let's start with the revolutionary war Morgan, the grandfather. You can put the preceding over there if you wish and also adjust the titles here accordingly, if you wish. I like to work on only the articles I like to work on, a few at a time, ideally one at a time, but I get bored with just one. So, I am not going to work on the Morgan name one, at least right now. You can if you like, or just put it over. Or, if you don't want to spend any time on it, stick it in the discussion over there for future synthesis. Now, I am sorry to have to be a bit irritable, but let me give you an example of what you are doing, perhaps unconsciously. I had a lot to do with the [[Battle of Thermopylae]]. It had been a good article but had fallen off and I was trying to fix it. Now, the main source is Herodotus. He is available in full in Wikisource. Do you think any of those idiots would look at a single paragraph of Herodotus? No, far easier to proclaim, this is unsourced, this is original contribution, what is your source on this? Yak yak yak. What a bunch of stupid cackling geese. One quick trip to Wikisource would have cleared up all doubt but do you think anyone would do that? Toward the end the Thebans put up their hands and surrendered, leaving the Spartans to die alone. They just kept questioning me over and over and over, what is your source for the hands up? They could not believe that universal gesture was used even then. Herodotus says very clearly, the Thebans put hands up and were taken into custody. Do you think anyone would bother to look it up? So, I gave in. I put in surrendered or some such thing. I wouldn't do that now. I would say, with me you have to be very careful that what you say is true. If it is I will object to nothing. If it isn't, well, the articles I work on I am usually pretty serious about so I will duke it out. I'm serious about this one. By the way, don't think you are going to get back at me by changing my writing. Go ahead and change it. I only care if you make it wrong or remove it without reason. Between you and me, I encourage you to think about what you say before you say it. People say what they do because they think they are right and therefore whatever they say is right. They go on the presumption of rightness. Excuse me, but that is the road to perdition. Always check out everything you say. Reality testing is tougher than the presumption of rightness but it ends up in a more realistic view. Ciao. I'm just going on working to keep the train of thought so I may not go over what you do for a while but I will go over it. If I seem to disappear it will be because I am taking a break on another article and not because I am in a petulent mood. Ciao.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 02:44, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
22654 +++$+++ Medeis +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22652 +++$+++ 22652 +++$+++ 2011-04-29 03:01:00 +++$+++ 1.304071260E09 +++$+++ My point is very simple, and doesn't require all that refutation.  What you wrote about the Morgan family name is absolutely fine, it just belongs in the article on the Morgan family name, with perhaps a link in LHM's article to the article on the name.  Yes, you quoted a source - I didn't say it was unreferenced.  But the source doesn't mention LHM at all, so the inference on our part connecting him to the family is indeed synthesis, ''even if it is true''.  So, a simple way to avoid some editor simply deleting the material as irrelevant at some point is to move it to [[Morgan (surname)]] to which you can still link in the LHM article, and where that material will also benefit readers of the article on the name.  +++$+++ :My point is very simple, and doesn't require all that refutation.  What you wrote about the Morgan family name is absolutely fine, it just belongs in the article on the Morgan family name, with perhaps a link in LHM's article to the article on the name.  Yes, you quoted a source - I didn't say it was unreferenced.  But the source doesn't mention LHM at all, so the inference on our part connecting him to the family is indeed synthesis, ''even if it is true''.  So, a simple way to avoid some editor simply deleting the material as irrelevant at some point is to move it to [[Morgan (surname)]] to which you can still link in the LHM article, and where that material will also benefit readers of the article on the name. [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 03:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
22655 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22652 +++$+++ 22654 +++$+++ 2011-04-29 05:01:00 +++$+++ 1.304078460E09 +++$+++ Oh, so that is what you meant. Well, take another look. The article covers Thomas of Connecticut, Morgan's grandfather. So, the supposed inference is not an inference unless you consider that a man's grandfather only infers him and does not prove him. Fine, it does not mention LHM. Instead, it mentions his known grandfather and that grandfather's line. As I recall Thomas was born in 1742. So, our main source connects Lewis to Thomas. Then this source we are talking about connects Thomas to the Massachusetts Morgans, the main ones that came over here. That Morgan is Welsh is undisputed. I had my choice of a couple of good sources on the Morgans and I chose this one. There is no inference, no synthesis. The line going back as far as I wanted to go is clear. Moreover, the source includes the etymology, which I wanted to get in. The etymology was really the main point. As long as the line through Thomas was in there that was acceptable. You know, the more I look at it, the more unclear your point gets. Where's the synthesis here? Most articles on people have some sort of background on the name. But, as we agree, there is an article covering that material so logically there is justification for putting it there. I think we've been over this twice now haven't we? I don't see the irrelevance you are talking about nor did I see it in the mammals article. Out there in the sources when they talk about LHM they inevitably start by talking about the Morgans as a whole. They consider it relevant. Why do you not consider it relevant? And why are the humans not a relevant example of a taxon less numerous than the most numerous taxon, rodents? As far as what editors do, don't put any faith in that. I was trying to tell you in the previous communication, most editors go on the presumption of self-righteousness and don't check anything out. And, they lard their reasons with phony excuses parroted from WP tags. If any editors are going to change what I write they are not necessarily going to be right or reasonable about it. On the whole though I don't  find that many changes in articles I work on and that is why I still work on them. We seem to be bogging down. Tell you what I will do. If you have not moved on this thing before I finish a pass through the text I will move the Morgan genealogy and supposed etymology to the Morgan name article. Then I WILL do some minimal work on that article. That fact that I was not directed to that article to start with means there is something wrong with the redirects. I will locate that problem and make sure everything directs properly. That is about the best I can do right now. You keep trying to tag me as someone who puts in irrelevant material and synthesizes. Not so. I consider all criticisms however. It is late and I have to go. +++$+++ ::Oh, so that is what you meant. Well, take another look. The article covers Thomas of Connecticut, Morgan's grandfather. So, the supposed inference is not an inference unless you consider that a man's grandfather only infers him and does not prove him. Fine, it does not mention LHM. Instead, it mentions his known grandfather and that grandfather's line. As I recall Thomas was born in 1742. So, our main source connects Lewis to Thomas. Then this source we are talking about connects Thomas to the Massachusetts Morgans, the main ones that came over here. That Morgan is Welsh is undisputed. I had my choice of a couple of good sources on the Morgans and I chose this one. There is no inference, no synthesis. The line going back as far as I wanted to go is clear. Moreover, the source includes the etymology, which I wanted to get in. The etymology was really the main point. As long as the line through Thomas was in there that was acceptable. You know, the more I look at it, the more unclear your point gets. Where's the synthesis here? Most articles on people have some sort of background on the name. But, as we agree, there is an article covering that material so logically there is justification for putting it there. I think we've been over this twice now haven't we? I don't see the irrelevance you are talking about nor did I see it in the mammals article. Out there in the sources when they talk about LHM they inevitably start by talking about the Morgans as a whole. They consider it relevant. Why do you not consider it relevant? And why are the humans not a relevant example of a taxon less numerous than the most numerous taxon, rodents? As far as what editors do, don't put any faith in that. I was trying to tell you in the previous communication, most editors go on the presumption of self-righteousness and don't check anything out. And, they lard their reasons with phony excuses parroted from WP tags. If any editors are going to change what I write they are not necessarily going to be right or reasonable about it. On the whole though I don't  find that many changes in articles I work on and that is why I still work on them. We seem to be bogging down. Tell you what I will do. If you have not moved on this thing before I finish a pass through the text I will move the Morgan genealogy and supposed etymology to the Morgan name article. Then I WILL do some minimal work on that article. That fact that I was not directed to that article to start with means there is something wrong with the redirects. I will locate that problem and make sure everything directs properly. That is about the best I can do right now. You keep trying to tag me as someone who puts in irrelevant material and synthesizes. Not so. I consider all criticisms however. It is late and I have to go.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 05:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

284799 +++$+++ Dvfinnh +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284799 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-29 01:26:00 +++$+++ 1.193646360E09 +++$+++ projects the intended scope.  +++$+++ projects the intended scope. [[User:Dvfinnh|Dvfinnh]] 01:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
284800 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284799 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-10-29 05:39:00 +++$+++ 1.193661540E09 +++$+++ Moving this comment and my reply to [[Talk: John Edwards]] for wider input. <strong> +++$+++ ::Moving this comment and my reply to [[Talk: John Edwards]] for wider input. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 05:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

22656 +++$+++ Dougweller +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22656 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-12 08:43:00 +++$+++ 1.307893380E09 +++$+++ check your email.  +++$+++ check your email. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 08:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
22657 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22656 +++$+++ 22656 +++$+++ 2011-06-12 08:51:00 +++$+++ 1.307893860E09 +++$+++ You're up awful early, Doug. Thanks Doug. I'm aiming at a clean article so that is my standard of judgement. Relevant material, good English, good format. My core article is [[three-age system]], the most general. There you will see that the true situation is generally not the same as what wP often has. I'm not done with that article but I need a little jump-around to get a sense of what has been going on at WP. Ciao. +++$+++ :You're up awful early, Doug. Thanks Doug. I'm aiming at a clean article so that is my standard of judgement. Relevant material, good English, good format. My core article is [[three-age system]], the most general. There you will see that the true situation is generally not the same as what wP often has. I'm not done with that article but I need a little jump-around to get a sense of what has been going on at WP. Ciao.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 08:51, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

284801 +++$+++ Happyme22 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284801 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-29 23:37:00 +++$+++ 1.193726220E09 +++$+++ Yeah wat's up with the latest comments on the FAC page? I commented on them and left a reply at the bottom, but everything the user said (with the possible exception of two or three cms) won't help the article or are completely meaningless.  +++$+++ Yeah wat's up with the latest comments on the FAC page? I commented on them and left a reply at the bottom, but everything the user said (with the possible exception of two or three cms) won't help the article or are completely meaningless. [[User:Happyme22|Happyme22]] 23:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
284802 +++$+++ Happyme22 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284801 +++$+++ 284801 +++$+++ 2007-11-05 06:01:00 +++$+++ 1.194271260E09 +++$+++ Yeah I too was suprised. Oh well; the copyedit goes on, and I'll definitely re-nominate. Thanks for the help!  +++$+++ :Yeah I too was suprised. Oh well; the copyedit goes on, and I'll definitely re-nominate. Thanks for the help! [[User:Happyme22|Happyme22]] 06:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

22658 +++$+++ Cynwolfe +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22658 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-06-26 13:13:00 +++$+++ 1.309119180E09 +++$+++ At [[Talk:Genius (mythology)]], you advise me to learn something about classical studies before daring to comment on this article. I suggest you take a look at [[User:Cynwolfe#Articles created]], and the edit history of such articles as [[Glossary of ancient Roman religion]]. Your implication that I lack fluency in English is an insult for which you need to apologize specifically.  +++$+++ At [[Talk:Genius (mythology)]], you advise me to learn something about classical studies before daring to comment on this article. I suggest you take a look at [[User:Cynwolfe#Articles created]], and the edit history of such articles as [[Glossary of ancient Roman religion]]. Your implication that I lack fluency in English is an insult for which you need to apologize specifically. [[User:Cynwolfe|Cynwolfe]] ([[User talk:Cynwolfe|talk]]) 13:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
22659 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22658 +++$+++ 22658 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 14:02:00 +++$+++ 1.309122120E09 +++$+++ My suggestion about the English was not intended for you. I was referring to the other commentators, who want to \"correct\" my English with bad English. You, however, have chosen take it with reference to yourself. That seems to me to be hot-headed. If I thought YOUR English was bad I would have corrected it. I don't recall seeing any of your English in the article. Your other accusations are similarly exaggerated. What I called for is that other classicists besides me work on that article. How is that an insult to you? Do you consider yourself a classicist? What I pointed out with some impatience at having to explain it again, even though I had already done so in the development of the article (which was mainly removed with uncivil comments) is that you did not understand the common definition of soul among the Greeks and Romans or you would not have made such comments about the soul and the nature of the genius. This is all quite standard. I think you should have before you removed material from the article or made comments questioning my referenced material. Apparently you seem to be offended because you consider yourself a classicist. In fact, it is not clear to me exactly why you are offended. I don't like your being offended for no good reason or for trumped up reasons. To me it is the mark of a hot-head. I do not know who or what you think you are on WP and I do not care. One thing you are NOT is familiar with the subject material. If you think you are going to use any possible administrator status to try and browbeat me, think again. I do not see that any apology is necessary, except yours to me for flying off the handle. Do you want to give it? If not we are pretty well done here until such time as you decide to be polite. Since I am not going to confront you at this time over further development of the article, I don't have time for hot-headed retorts I consider adolescent. I recommend you not clutter up my user page with this exchange. it is for discussion, and this is definitely not discussion. +++$+++ :My suggestion about the English was not intended for you. I was referring to the other commentators, who want to "correct" my English with bad English. You, however, have chosen take it with reference to yourself. That seems to me to be hot-headed. If I thought YOUR English was bad I would have corrected it. I don't recall seeing any of your English in the article. Your other accusations are similarly exaggerated. What I called for is that other classicists besides me work on that article. How is that an insult to you? Do you consider yourself a classicist? What I pointed out with some impatience at having to explain it again, even though I had already done so in the development of the article (which was mainly removed with uncivil comments) is that you did not understand the common definition of soul among the Greeks and Romans or you would not have made such comments about the soul and the nature of the genius. This is all quite standard. I think you should have before you removed material from the article or made comments questioning my referenced material. Apparently you seem to be offended because you consider yourself a classicist. In fact, it is not clear to me exactly why you are offended. I don't like your being offended for no good reason or for trumped up reasons. To me it is the mark of a hot-head. I do not know who or what you think you are on WP and I do not care. One thing you are NOT is familiar with the subject material. If you think you are going to use any possible administrator status to try and browbeat me, think again. I do not see that any apology is necessary, except yours to me for flying off the handle. Do you want to give it? If not we are pretty well done here until such time as you decide to be polite. Since I am not going to confront you at this time over further development of the article, I don't have time for hot-headed retorts I consider adolescent. I recommend you not clutter up my user page with this exchange. it is for discussion, and this is definitely not discussion.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 14:02, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
22660 +++$+++ Cynwolfe +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22658 +++$+++ 22659 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.309124040E09 +++$+++ I appreciate any editor who has a genuine interest in ancient Roman religion, as you seem to. However, the sources used at that article are not anywhere near the best that are available. I thought you were talking to me because you replied to a comment I made on the talk page, you named me, didn't name any other editor, and then wrote sentences that began with \"you,\" for which there was no other antecedent but me. I am not an administrator.  And not that it matters on Wikipedia, but I am in fact a classicist. I hold degrees in classical studies, and have taught courses in classical studies at the university level, including Latin and mythology, in addition to contributing widely to related articles on Wikipedia. ''Genius'' and ''anima'' (soul) are two different words in Latin, and two different concepts, but related in interesting ways. I often hope to find other editors who like to share sources and work toward an understanding of topics in Roman religion that can then be presented in the article in a clear, accurate and informative manner. My initial comment at [[Talk:Genius (mythology)]] criticized the presentation of the material, not any editors. I find your repeated use of the word \"hothead\" amusing, but shall seek my amusement elsewhere, with apologies for misunderstanding your use of pronouns.  +++$+++ ::I appreciate any editor who has a genuine interest in ancient Roman religion, as you seem to. However, the sources used at that article are not anywhere near the best that are available. I thought you were talking to me because you replied to a comment I made on the talk page, you named me, didn't name any other editor, and then wrote sentences that began with "you," for which there was no other antecedent but me. I am not an administrator.  And not that it matters on Wikipedia, but I am in fact a classicist. I hold degrees in classical studies, and have taught courses in classical studies at the university level, including Latin and mythology, in addition to contributing widely to related articles on Wikipedia. ''Genius'' and ''anima'' (soul) are two different words in Latin, and two different concepts, but related in interesting ways. I often hope to find other editors who like to share sources and work toward an understanding of topics in Roman religion that can then be presented in the article in a clear, accurate and informative manner. My initial comment at [[Talk:Genius (mythology)]] criticized the presentation of the material, not any editors. I find your repeated use of the word "hothead" amusing, but shall seek my amusement elsewhere, with apologies for misunderstanding your use of pronouns. [[User:Cynwolfe|Cynwolfe]] ([[User talk:Cynwolfe|talk]]) 14:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
22661 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22658 +++$+++ 22660 +++$+++ 2011-06-26 14:53:00 +++$+++ 1.309125180E09 +++$+++ Well that was nicely said, Cynewulf. Since you are inclined to apologize I certainly apologize for being so brief about my comments as for you to be able to mistake them. I often do that, begin with one commentator and slip over to another. I do apologize. As for who they may be I cannot divulge that as that wold be unethical. If you read through the changes I am sure you will have no trouble spotting them. At the moment I got no reason to doubt your credentials. Classics is a big field. None of us can know everything in it. Philosophy especially is a speciality. The hylomorphism of many ancients is especially difficult from moderns to grasp. If you have some doubts I suppose in the end it is legitimate to ask for an expansion: more references, more theorists. Fine. Put the tag back. I was never happy with the shortness of the article anyway but I had to consider the views of other contributors. You removals made it quite a bit shorter. Now we know what needs to be done. We need to develop the theme of the genius further, perhaps saying a few words about the soul. I got no idea whether WP has an anywhere near acceptable article on the soul. Such an article would certainly have to include Plato and Aristotle. I say all this but actually I have to reassert that I am actually on other things and am not choosing to get back into classical philosophy at the moment. So you must go on without me. You can be the wulf in the midst of the wolves. Bow wow Diogenes. Perhaps I should have just passed it by until I am ready. I will have to try and remember this discussion, if I live long enough to get back to it. If you got any further questions, doubts, whatever, give me jingle. For know I'm off it in favor of archaeology. Ciao. +++$+++ :::Well that was nicely said, Cynewulf. Since you are inclined to apologize I certainly apologize for being so brief about my comments as for you to be able to mistake them. I often do that, begin with one commentator and slip over to another. I do apologize. As for who they may be I cannot divulge that as that wold be unethical. If you read through the changes I am sure you will have no trouble spotting them. At the moment I got no reason to doubt your credentials. Classics is a big field. None of us can know everything in it. Philosophy especially is a speciality. The hylomorphism of many ancients is especially difficult from moderns to grasp. If you have some doubts I suppose in the end it is legitimate to ask for an expansion: more references, more theorists. Fine. Put the tag back. I was never happy with the shortness of the article anyway but I had to consider the views of other contributors. You removals made it quite a bit shorter. Now we know what needs to be done. We need to develop the theme of the genius further, perhaps saying a few words about the soul. I got no idea whether WP has an anywhere near acceptable article on the soul. Such an article would certainly have to include Plato and Aristotle. I say all this but actually I have to reassert that I am actually on other things and am not choosing to get back into classical philosophy at the moment. So you must go on without me. You can be the wulf in the midst of the wolves. Bow wow Diogenes. Perhaps I should have just passed it by until I am ready. I will have to try and remember this discussion, if I live long enough to get back to it. If you got any further questions, doubts, whatever, give me jingle. For know I'm off it in favor of archaeology. Ciao.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 14:53, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

546947 +++$+++ Theleftorium +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546947 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-19 12:20:00 +++$+++ 1.253388000E09 +++$+++ Yeah, no problem. Your rewrite was much better than mine though. :-) ''''' +++$+++ Yeah, no problem. Your rewrite was much better than mine though. :-) '''''[[User:Theleftorium|<font color="AE0937">The</font>]][[User talk:Theleftorium|<font color="AD4740">left</font><font color="C6454E">orium</font>]]''''' 12:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
546948 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546947 +++$+++ 546947 +++$+++ 2009-09-19 12:27:00 +++$+++ 1.253388420E09 +++$+++ Actually, I think your version was probably fine as it stood. I only reduced it a bit. I mean, after all, there are only a few ways that we can write the exact same few facts. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Actually, I think your version was probably fine as it stood. I only reduced it a bit. I mean, after all, there are only a few ways that we can write the exact same few facts. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 12:27, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

284804 +++$+++ Pagrashtak +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284804 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-10-31 14:07:00 +++$+++ 1.193864820E09 +++$+++ I'm assuming it was a accident, but I'm confused as you why you edited my signature [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALeranedo&diff=168243143&oldid=168237738 here]. It was in a separate place\u2014not sure how that happened. '''<font color=\"8855DD\"> +++$+++ I'm assuming it was a accident, but I'm confused as you why you edited my signature [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALeranedo&diff=168243143&oldid=168237738 here]. It was in a separate place—not sure how that happened. '''<font color="8855DD">[[User:Pagrashtak|Pagra]]</font><font color="#6666AA">[[User talk:Pagrashtak|shtak]]</font>''' 14:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
284805 +++$+++ Pagrashtak +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284804 +++$+++ 284804 +++$+++ 2007-10-31 15:56:00 +++$+++ 1.193871360E09 +++$+++ No worries, nice to meet you too. '''<font color=\"8855DD\"> +++$+++ :No worries, nice to meet you too. '''<font color="8855DD">[[User:Pagrashtak|Pagra]]</font><font color="#6666AA">[[User talk:Pagrashtak|shtak]]</font>''' 15:56, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

546949 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546949 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-20 06:27:00 +++$+++ 1.253453220E09 +++$+++ You popped a copyvio tag on this article, I redid it at the subpage (I was hoping someone else at WPEQ had the time to fix it, but no one did, so I did up a quick version)  See if it works and let me know if it doesn't.  Thanks.  +++$+++ You popped a copyvio tag on this article, I redid it at the subpage (I was hoping someone else at WPEQ had the time to fix it, but no one did, so I did up a quick version)  See if it works and let me know if it doesn't.  Thanks. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 06:27, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
546950 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546949 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-20 08:21:00 +++$+++ 1.253460060E09 +++$+++ Thanks for stepping in and taking on the rewrite of this article. The issues appear to be addressed. I've replaced the original copyvio page with your version. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Thanks for stepping in and taking on the rewrite of this article. The issues appear to be addressed. I've replaced the original copyvio page with your version. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 08:21, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
546951 +++$+++ Montanabw +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546949 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-09-21 03:49:00 +++$+++ 1.253530140E09 +++$+++ Any time, glad to help.   +++$+++ :::::Any time, glad to help.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 03:49, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
546952 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546949 +++$+++ 546949 +++$+++ 2009-09-13 10:22:00 +++$+++ 1.252862520E09 +++$+++ By the way, the [[Wikipedia:Article_wizard_2.0]] can be a great help when creating a first article. When you have a draft, let me know. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Good luck. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :By the way, the [[Wikipedia:Article_wizard_2.0]] can be a great help when creating a first article. When you have a draft, let me know. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Good luck. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 10:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
546953 +++$+++ Dtines +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546949 +++$+++ 546952 +++$+++ 2009-09-16 17:53:00 +++$+++ 1.253148780E09 +++$+++ Hello-  I've put a new draft up at User:Dtines\/Randy Weiner with references.  Please let me know if this will work as an article.  Thanks for your help!  +++$+++ ::Hello-  I've put a new draft up at User:Dtines/Randy Weiner with references.  Please let me know if this will work as an article.  Thanks for your help! [[User:Dtines|Dtines]] ([[User talk:Dtines|talk]]) 17:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
546954 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546949 +++$+++ 546953 +++$+++ 2009-09-17 20:11:00 +++$+++ 1.253243460E09 +++$+++ I've replied on your talk page.<span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::I've replied on your talk page.<span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 20:11, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

265921 +++$+++ Ars Scriptor +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265921 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-12-04 01:52:00 +++$+++ 1.165225920E09 +++$+++ Hey there, just dropping you a note about the Starwood Festival stuff going on, since you have been pretty much involved from the beginning.  [[User:Paul Pigman]] asked me for advice on dealing with it, and I basically said that he should consider opening a simple [[WP:RFC|RfC]] on the Starwood talk page asking whether it's appropriate to place all those links everywhere.  If the consensus is no, then they should be removed promptly, and anyone adding them back can be blocked for disruption.  I have also said that if he decides to do this, he should ask Salix Alba to withdraw his mediation case for the time being.  He may take my advice, he may not, but it might just solve this problem. --<font color=\"3300FF\"> +++$+++ Hey there, just dropping you a note about the Starwood Festival stuff going on, since you have been pretty much involved from the beginning.  [[User:Paul Pigman]] asked me for advice on dealing with it, and I basically said that he should consider opening a simple [[WP:RFC|RfC]] on the Starwood talk page asking whether it's appropriate to place all those links everywhere.  If the consensus is no, then they should be removed promptly, and anyone adding them back can be blocked for disruption.  I have also said that if he decides to do this, he should ask Salix Alba to withdraw his mediation case for the time being.  He may take my advice, he may not, but it might just solve this problem. --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Ars Scriptor|Ars Scriptor]] </font> 01:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
265922 +++$+++ Paul_Pigman +++$+++ Mattisse +++$+++ 265921 +++$+++ 265921 +++$+++ 2006-12-04 04:47:00 +++$+++ 1.165236420E09 +++$+++ I'd also like to mention that an [[WP:RFC|RfC]] '''has''' been opened on the [[Talk:Starwood Festival]] page. I'm a little unclear exactly how this works but there is a place for editors to state their views on the matter. -- +++$+++ :I'd also like to mention that an [[WP:RFC|RfC]] '''has''' been opened on the [[Talk:Starwood Festival]] page. I'm a little unclear exactly how this works but there is a place for editors to state their views on the matter. --[[User:Paul_Pigman|'''Pigman''']] ([[User talk:Paul_Pigman|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Paul_Pigman|contribs]]) 04:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

284808 +++$+++ Gbrading +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284808 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-02 00:39:00 +++$+++ 1.193989140E09 +++$+++ I'd just like to say that I believe I was correct in changing the tense from 'was' to 'is'. Before I changed the opening sentence, it read as follows ''Mary Anna McCartney Donald (born in London on 28 August 1969) was the first child born to rock photographer Linda Eastman McCartney and Paul McCartney of The Beatles.'' Here, 'was', seems to point out that she no longer 'is' the first child of Linda and Paul, and I read this to sound as though she had died, or 'was' no longer their child, which is impossible. Therefore, I believe my change was correct, whilst she 'was' born, she 'is' and always will be the first child of Linda and Paul, this fact will never change. :)  +++$+++ I'd just like to say that I believe I was correct in changing the tense from 'was' to 'is'. Before I changed the opening sentence, it read as follows ''Mary Anna McCartney Donald (born in London on 28 August 1969) was the first child born to rock photographer Linda Eastman McCartney and Paul McCartney of The Beatles.'' Here, 'was', seems to point out that she no longer 'is' the first child of Linda and Paul, and I read this to sound as though she had died, or 'was' no longer their child, which is impossible. Therefore, I believe my change was correct, whilst she 'was' born, she 'is' and always will be the first child of Linda and Paul, this fact will never change. :) [[User:Gbrading|Gbrading]] 00:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
284809 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284808 +++$+++ 284808 +++$+++ 2007-11-02 02:42:00 +++$+++ 1.193996520E09 +++$+++ Replied on [[Talk: Mary McCartney]] - hope others will weigh in on this.  <strong> +++$+++ :Replied on [[Talk: Mary McCartney]] - hope others will weigh in on this.  <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 02:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

284811 +++$+++ Knulclunk +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284811 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-08 23:30:00 +++$+++ 1.194593400E09 +++$+++ \"killing of unarmed student protesters\" works. Thanks -- +++$+++ "killing of unarmed student protesters" works. Thanks --[[User:Knulclunk|Knulclunk]] 23:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
284812 +++$+++ Patrick Henry 1776 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284811 +++$+++ 284811 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 13:53:00 +++$+++ 1.194731580E09 +++$+++ I feel somewhat uncomfortable with your explanation that refers to \"reliable secondary sources\". Any secondary source can also cherry pick comments to support ideas being advanced in an article. I have just read Alan Greenspan's book. In the book he makes both positive and negative comments about Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan and Bush. However, in the Wikipedia article no Greenspan quotes are listed for Carter or Reagan. Greenspan quotes about Clinton are only positive in nature. I would not mind if both positive and negative quotes from Mr. Greenspan, concerning a particular individual, are included. However, when a verifiable quote is continually deleted, it begins to give the appearance, that censorship is taking place. Several of my student friends are getting concerned about the objectivity of this article. +++$+++ :I feel somewhat uncomfortable with your explanation that refers to "reliable secondary sources". Any secondary source can also cherry pick comments to support ideas being advanced in an article. I have just read Alan Greenspan's book. In the book he makes both positive and negative comments about Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan and Bush. However, in the Wikipedia article no Greenspan quotes are listed for Carter or Reagan. Greenspan quotes about Clinton are only positive in nature. I would not mind if both positive and negative quotes from Mr. Greenspan, concerning a particular individual, are included. However, when a verifiable quote is continually deleted, it begins to give the appearance, that censorship is taking place. Several of my student friends are getting concerned about the objectivity of this article.[[User:Patrick Henry 1776|Patrick Henry 1776]] 13:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

22668 +++$+++ Dorieo +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22668 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2011-08-04 18:47:00 +++$+++ 1.312508820E09 +++$+++ [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Eteocypriot_language&diff=cur&oldid=prev for you] ;)  +++$+++ [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eteocypriot_language&diff=cur&oldid=prev for you] ;) [[User:Dorieo|Dorieo]] ([[User talk:Dorieo|talk]]) 18:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
22669 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22668 +++$+++ 22668 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 00:19:00 +++$+++ 1.312528740E09 +++$+++ Hello. Nice picture. I did some work on that article once but I cannot remember it now. As I look at the script now two elements strike my attention: arta-, which seems as though it might be an Indo-Aryan import, and wa-na-ka, the Linear B Greek \"king.\" Anyway is there anything else you wanted to say? +++$+++ :Hello. Nice picture. I did some work on that article once but I cannot remember it now. As I look at the script now two elements strike my attention: arta-, which seems as though it might be an Indo-Aryan import, and wa-na-ka, the Linear B Greek "king." Anyway is there anything else you wanted to say?[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 00:19, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
22670 +++$+++ Davius +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22668 +++$+++ 22669 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.312587480E09 +++$+++ Please, can you explicit in which position (by counting symbols) in which you read ''ar-ta-'' and the position in which you can red ''wa-na-ka'', thank you very much!  +++$+++ ::Please, can you explicit in which position (by counting symbols) in which you read ''ar-ta-'' and the position in which you can red ''wa-na-ka'', thank you very much! [[User:Davius|Davius]] ([[User talk:Davius|talk]]) 16:38, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
22671 +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ Botteville +++$+++ 22668 +++$+++ 22670 +++$+++ 2011-08-05 19:22:00 +++$+++ 1.312597320E09 +++$+++ If I were going to conjecture, I say, but I am not. I'm not working on the article and I would never put unreferenced material in. As far as I'm concerned, my view is original material, but I'd be willing to bet the topic is covered by an article somewhere. I don't know why you'd want to know that. I have not checked the article. If it is as it says, and the Greek name is known, then it has to be pretty much as I said, but anyone even partly cognizant in the field could spot that. This is all strictly academic and gratuitous, as it will never go into an article without a reference. Ciao. Oh by the way, welcome to WP. The important thing to remember is you need references for what you say and you never put in original thinking of yours. There are some other rules too. You'll get used to it. +++$+++ :::If I were going to conjecture, I say, but I am not. I'm not working on the article and I would never put unreferenced material in. As far as I'm concerned, my view is original material, but I'd be willing to bet the topic is covered by an article somewhere. I don't know why you'd want to know that. I have not checked the article. If it is as it says, and the Greek name is known, then it has to be pretty much as I said, but anyone even partly cognizant in the field could spot that. This is all strictly academic and gratuitous, as it will never go into an article without a reference. Ciao. Oh by the way, welcome to WP. The important thing to remember is you need references for what you say and you never put in original thinking of yours. There are some other rules too. You'll get used to it.[[User:Botteville|Dave]] ([[User talk:Botteville#top|talk]]) 19:22, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

70587 +++$+++ Zzyzx11 +++$+++ Hholt01 +++$+++ 70587 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2006-08-14 22:22:00 +++$+++ 1.155619320E09 +++$+++ If you would like, I can move [[Browns (disambiguation)]] back to [[Browns]] on the basis that there is no evidence or consensus that the primary meaning of \"Browns\" should be \"Cleveland Browns\", especially because I do not know how popular [[Browns of Chester]] is in England, or how well known [[The Browns]] signing group is.  +++$+++ If you would like, I can move [[Browns (disambiguation)]] back to [[Browns]] on the basis that there is no evidence or consensus that the primary meaning of "Browns" should be "Cleveland Browns", especially because I do not know how popular [[Browns of Chester]] is in England, or how well known [[The Browns]] signing group is. [[User:Zzyzx11|Zzyzx11]] [[User talk:Zzyzx11|(Talk)]] 22:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
70588 +++$+++ Zzyzx11 +++$+++ Hholt01 +++$+++ 70587 +++$+++ 70587 +++$+++ 2006-08-15 06:20:00 +++$+++ 1.155648000E09 +++$+++ You might also want to post something at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] if you actually want to propose a move, and to get more users to participate. Be sure to also read the \"What requested moves are not for\" section and the \"Steps for requesting a page move\" section. Good luck.  +++$+++ *You might also want to post something at [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]] if you actually want to propose a move, and to get more users to participate. Be sure to also read the "What requested moves are not for" section and the "Steps for requesting a page move" section. Good luck. [[User:Zzyzx11|Zzyzx11]] [[User talk:Zzyzx11|(Talk)]] 06:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

284814 +++$+++ Michel Tavir +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284814 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-10 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.194726480E09 +++$+++ As you may have noticed, it's a difficult article. On paying you this visit, I've discovered the notion of [http:\/\/meta.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Inclusionism \"inclusionism\"]. Having had my share of troubles with \"deletionists\" on English Wikipedia, I can only applaud to this initiative (somehow, the ailment is not as severe on the other localised versions of Wikipedia where I happen to be an editor). Has resistance to \"deletionism\" turned into something more organised? \xb7  +++$+++ As you may have noticed, it's a difficult article. On paying you this visit, I've discovered the notion of [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Inclusionism "inclusionism"]. Having had my share of troubles with "deletionists" on English Wikipedia, I can only applaud to this initiative (somehow, the ailment is not as severe on the other localised versions of Wikipedia where I happen to be an editor). Has resistance to "deletionism" turned into something more organised? · [[User:Michel Tavir|Michel]] 12:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
284815 +++$+++ Bellagio99 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 22:41:00 +++$+++ 1.194763260E09 +++$+++ YMMV,  +++$+++ :::YMMV, [[User:Bellagio99|Bellagio99]] 22:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
284816 +++$+++ Knulclunk +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284814 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2007-11-10 23:45:00 +++$+++ 1.194767100E09 +++$+++ Thanks for all the reference help on the massacre article! :) -- +++$+++ ::::Thanks for all the reference help on the massacre article! :) --[[User:Knulclunk|Knulclunk]] 23:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

546959 +++$+++ Slumdog102 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546959 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-25 10:48:00 +++$+++ 1.253900880E09 +++$+++ Yes, Sir. I know that that may be infringement. I have rewritten everything. Sir, could you please check [[Talk:Michael Lobo\/Temp]]. Thankyou Sir,  +++$+++ Yes, Sir. I know that that may be infringement. I have rewritten everything. Sir, could you please check [[Talk:Michael Lobo/Temp]]. Thankyou Sir, [[User:Slumdog102|Slumdog102]] ([[User talk:Slumdog102|talk]]) 10:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
546960 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546959 +++$+++ 546959 +++$+++ 2009-09-25 10:52:00 +++$+++ 1.253901120E09 +++$+++ No problem. I'll be happy to check it over. I'll take a look at it later today. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :No problem. I'll be happy to check it over. I'll take a look at it later today. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 10:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
546961 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546959 +++$+++ 546960 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 08:04:00 +++$+++ 1.253977440E09 +++$+++ Thanks for rewriting the text to eliminate the copyright infringement. I made some additional changes to remove the redundant sentences as well as the promotional tone and attribute text to the subject's claims. I've moved the article into the mainspace. Good luck with your editing. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ ::Thanks for rewriting the text to eliminate the copyright infringement. I made some additional changes to remove the redundant sentences as well as the promotional tone and attribute text to the subject's claims. I've moved the article into the mainspace. Good luck with your editing. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 08:04, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

22672 +++$+++ Wizardman +++$+++ Danski14 +++$+++ 22672 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-22 18:00:00 +++$+++ 1.248310800E09 +++$+++ |}  +++$+++ |} [[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#060">'''''Wizardman'''''</span>]] 18:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
22673 +++$+++ PFHLai +++$+++ Danski14 +++$+++ 22672 +++$+++ 22672 +++$+++ 2009-07-25 04:18:00 +++$+++ 1.248520680E09 +++$+++ You're welcome, Danski14.  Your nice new article deserves the spotlight on MainPage.  Please be encouraged to self-nom. your next new contribution to Wikipedia.  Happy ediing!  Cheers! :-)  -- +++$+++ : You're welcome, Danski14.  Your nice new article deserves the spotlight on MainPage.  Please be encouraged to self-nom. your next new contribution to Wikipedia.  Happy ediing!  Cheers! :-)  --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 04:18, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

472123 +++$+++ Joopercoopers +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 472123 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-30 12:00:00 +++$+++ 1.201723200E09 +++$+++ I'd be grateful for your thoughts. -- +++$+++ I'd be grateful for your thoughts. --[[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]] ([[User talk:Joopercoopers|talk]]) 12:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
472124 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 472123 +++$+++ 472123 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 12:10:00 +++$+++ 1.201723800E09 +++$+++ Let me know what you think. I don't have time to write something, but would be prepared to co-nominate and sign something you write.  +++$+++ :Let me know what you think. I don't have time to write something, but would be prepared to co-nominate and sign something you write. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth#top|talk]]) 12:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
472125 +++$+++ Joopercoopers +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 472123 +++$+++ 472124 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 12:17:00 +++$+++ 1.201724220E09 +++$+++ I'll draft something up over the lunch hour and post it here - it can wait until your back on line I'm sure. -- +++$+++ ::I'll draft something up over the lunch hour and post it here - it can wait until your back on line I'm sure. --[[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]] ([[User talk:Joopercoopers|talk]]) 12:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
472126 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 472123 +++$+++ 472125 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 12:28:00 +++$+++ 1.201724880E09 +++$+++ [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion\/Wikipedia:IRC channels\/wikipedia-en-admins (3rd nomination)]] will be the link you need. I'll be around, just not editing much. The critical thing is to make clear that this debate is not just about deletion, but is intended to help clarify some points, and help the arbcom by providing community input about the page. Make clear that early closure and moving the discussion somewhere else is an option, but ask that the nomination be left open for a set time or until it is clear that the wider community are aware of the discussion. WP:MfD is not strictly for that sort of things, but has been used that way in the past.  +++$+++ :::[[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:IRC channels/wikipedia-en-admins (3rd nomination)]] will be the link you need. I'll be around, just not editing much. The critical thing is to make clear that this debate is not just about deletion, but is intended to help clarify some points, and help the arbcom by providing community input about the page. Make clear that early closure and moving the discussion somewhere else is an option, but ask that the nomination be left open for a set time or until it is clear that the wider community are aware of the discussion. WP:MfD is not strictly for that sort of things, but has been used that way in the past. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth#top|talk]]) 12:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
472127 +++$+++ Joopercoopers +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 472123 +++$+++ 472126 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 14:01:00 +++$+++ 1.201730460E09 +++$+++ Ok, there's a draft [[User:Joopercoopers\/test|here]] -- +++$+++ ::::Ok, there's a draft [[User:Joopercoopers/test|here]] --[[User:Joopercoopers|Joopercoopers]] ([[User talk:Joopercoopers|talk]]) 14:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
472128 +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ Carcharoth +++$+++ 472123 +++$+++ 472127 +++$+++ 2008-01-30 14:25:00 +++$+++ 1.201731900E09 +++$+++ Looks good. A few things. Is \"indentified\" a typo? Shouldn't the IRC case link be [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration\/IRC]], rather than the talk page? Some links might be useful. Such as [[User talk:David Gerard#Future of WP:WEA page]] and (from the proposed decision page) [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/IRC\/Proposed_decision#Policy_issues_surrounding_IRC|this]]. The ownership issues appear confused, as shown by [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration\/IRC\/Proposed_decision#Pages_are_not_owned|this]], but the follow up (after David Gerard e-mailed the arbcom mailing list) was on the talk page [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration\/IRC\/Proposed_decision#To_Newyorkbrad_.28or_any_other_Arb.29_re_David_Gerard.27s_private_Statement_to_ArbCom|here]]. Finally, how do you want to handle the nomination? Just you, and then I add a background comment? Or what? Jehochman refers to a previous example below. Should that be included? I agree that too many options would be bad. My proposal would be to merge back to [[WP:IRC]] (keeping that as an information\/how-to page - mainly just links), and then create a subpage of the arbitration pages and direct people with complaints there. But that may have to await the pleasure of the arbitration committee, and if created now, should be tagged as \"proposed\". The root of the problem was an attempt to use [[WP:WEA]] to make a complaint - so my solution would be to create a proper venue for such complaints.  +++$+++ :::::Looks good. A few things. Is "indentified" a typo? Shouldn't the IRC case link be [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/IRC]], rather than the talk page? Some links might be useful. Such as [[User talk:David Gerard#Future of WP:WEA page]] and (from the proposed decision page) [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/IRC/Proposed_decision#Policy_issues_surrounding_IRC|this]]. The ownership issues appear confused, as shown by [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/IRC/Proposed_decision#Pages_are_not_owned|this]], but the follow up (after David Gerard e-mailed the arbcom mailing list) was on the talk page [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/IRC/Proposed_decision#To_Newyorkbrad_.28or_any_other_Arb.29_re_David_Gerard.27s_private_Statement_to_ArbCom|here]]. Finally, how do you want to handle the nomination? Just you, and then I add a background comment? Or what? Jehochman refers to a previous example below. Should that be included? I agree that too many options would be bad. My proposal would be to merge back to [[WP:IRC]] (keeping that as an information/how-to page - mainly just links), and then create a subpage of the arbitration pages and direct people with complaints there. But that may have to await the pleasure of the arbitration committee, and if created now, should be tagged as "proposed". The root of the problem was an attempt to use [[WP:WEA]] to make a complaint - so my solution would be to create a proper venue for such complaints. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth#top|talk]]) 14:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

546962 +++$+++ Garbolia +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546962 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-26 01:48:00 +++$+++ 1.253954880E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the instruction. Please check out the note on [[Talk:Empress Vampire (film)]]. --[[User:Garbolia|Garbolia]] ([[User talk:Garbolia|talk]]) 01:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[[User:Garbolia|Garbolia]] -- +++$+++ Thanks for the instruction. Please check out the note on [[Talk:Empress Vampire (film)]]. --[[User:Garbolia|Garbolia]] ([[User talk:Garbolia|talk]]) 01:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[[User:Garbolia|Garbolia]] --[[User:Garbolia|Garbolia]] ([[User talk:Garbolia|talk]]) 01:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
546963 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546962 +++$+++ 546962 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 06:29:00 +++$+++ 1.253971740E09 +++$+++ Thanks for supplying that link. I've removed the copyvio template from the plot summary. Please note that although text in a press release may be permitted for use, it still must to conform with WP [[WP:NPOV|neutral point-of-view]] and [[WP:ARTSPAM|non-promotional]] guidelines. In the case of writing about film, the guidelines at [[WP:MOSFILM]] will help. Good luck. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Thanks for supplying that link. I've removed the copyvio template from the plot summary. Please note that although text in a press release may be permitted for use, it still must to conform with WP [[WP:NPOV|neutral point-of-view]] and [[WP:ARTSPAM|non-promotional]] guidelines. In the case of writing about film, the guidelines at [[WP:MOSFILM]] will help. Good luck. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 06:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
546964 +++$+++ Garbolia +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546962 +++$+++ 546963 +++$+++ 2009-09-26 16:34:00 +++$+++ 1.254008040E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the understanding and suggestion. I think I've removed and re-edited some of the text from the release to become wiki article format and rules. The edit on wikipedia was not exact the same as the release, but I will work on it later to be better to follow wikipedia rules. I may consult with you on more details later if possible. Thanks again. --- +++$+++ :: Thanks for the understanding and suggestion. I think I've removed and re-edited some of the text from the release to become wiki article format and rules. The edit on wikipedia was not exact the same as the release, but I will work on it later to be better to follow wikipedia rules. I may consult with you on more details later if possible. Thanks again. ---[[User:Garbolia|Garbolia]] ([[User talk:Garbolia|talk]]) 16:34, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
546965 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546962 +++$+++ 546962 +++$+++ 2009-09-28 08:10:00 +++$+++ 1.254150600E09 +++$+++ Great. With the source pages in compliance, I've removed the copyright violation template. Just a reminder: the text from the source may be used now - but only if it meets the Wikipedia policies on [[WP:NPOV|neutral point-of-view]] and [[WP:PROMO|non-promotional text]]. Thanks for handling the CV problem. Cheers. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Great. With the source pages in compliance, I've removed the copyright violation template. Just a reminder: the text from the source may be used now - but only if it meets the Wikipedia policies on [[WP:NPOV|neutral point-of-view]] and [[WP:PROMO|non-promotional text]]. Thanks for handling the CV problem. Cheers. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 08:10, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

284822 +++$+++ Knulclunk +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284822 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-17 21:05:00 +++$+++ 1.195362300E09 +++$+++ I sure that is the reference she meant.  Thanks for getting the source. You all pro, baby! -- +++$+++ I sure that is the reference she meant.  Thanks for getting the source. You all pro, baby! --[[User:Knulclunk|Knulclunk]] ([[User talk:Knulclunk|talk]]) 21:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
284823 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284822 +++$+++ 284822 +++$+++ 2007-11-18 11:44:00 +++$+++ 1.195415040E09 +++$+++ Not here please - I'm moving this to [[Talk: List of massacres]] for response. <strong> +++$+++ :Not here please - I'm moving this to [[Talk: List of massacres]] for response. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 11:44, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
284824 +++$+++ Philip Baird Shearer +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284822 +++$+++ 284823 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 10:44:00 +++$+++ 1.196275440E09 +++$+++ Please see [[Talk:List of massacres#Proposal for a new table layout]] -- +++$+++ ::Please see [[Talk:List of massacres#Proposal for a new table layout]] --[[User:Philip Baird Shearer|Philip Baird Shearer]] ([[User talk:Philip Baird Shearer|talk]]) 10:44, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
284825 +++$+++ Philip Baird Shearer +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284822 +++$+++ 284823 +++$+++ 2007-12-01 23:33:00 +++$+++ 1.196580780E09 +++$+++ Please see [[User talk:Sarah777#List of massacres]] -- +++$+++ ::Please see [[User talk:Sarah777#List of massacres]] --[[User:Philip Baird Shearer|Philip Baird Shearer]] 23:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

91161 +++$+++ Cirt +++$+++ Rajah +++$+++ 91161 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-06-26 18:02:00 +++$+++ 1.277600520E09 +++$+++ }}  -- ''' +++$+++ }}  -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 18:02, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
91162 +++$+++ KimChee +++$+++ Rajah +++$+++ 91161 +++$+++ 91161 +++$+++ 2010-11-27 18:40:00 +++$+++ 1.290912000E09 +++$+++ Hello, the Ronnie Lee Gardner has recently been promoted to [[Talk:Ronnie Lee Gardner|featured article status]].  +++$+++ :Hello, the Ronnie Lee Gardner has recently been promoted to [[Talk:Ronnie Lee Gardner|featured article status]]. [[User:KimChee|KimChee]] ([[User talk:KimChee|talk]]) 18:40, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

22683 +++$+++ Rlevse +++$+++ Danski14 +++$+++ 22683 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-09-22 06:03:00 +++$+++ 1.285160580E09 +++$+++ }}  <span style=\"font-family:Verdana,sans-serif\"> \u2014  +++$+++ }}  <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 06:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
22684 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Danski14 +++$+++ 22683 +++$+++ 22683 +++$+++ 2011-03-04 15:35:00 +++$+++ 1.299281700E09 +++$+++ If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!  +++$+++ :If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 15:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

284830 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284830 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-11-27 14:15:00 +++$+++ 1.196201700E09 +++$+++ Hiya Tvoz - just wanted to thank you for helping to fix the Anne Frank article.   It's looking a lot better, and I'm going to try to devote some time to working on it also.   +++$+++ Hiya Tvoz - just wanted to thank you for helping to fix the Anne Frank article.   It's looking a lot better, and I'm going to try to devote some time to working on it also.  [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] ([[User talk:Rossrs|talk]]) 14:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
284831 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284830 +++$+++ 284830 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 07:17:00 +++$+++ 1.196263020E09 +++$+++ Hi again Tvoz.  With regards to sourcing - I have two biographies (Melissa Muller & Carol Lee) which both cover very similar territory and can be used to cover Anne's life.  They're both very good.   Also a book from the Anne Frank House, which is a fairly slim paperback, but has some good things, plus a fantastic book about the house, which has heaps of good things.   So I think her life is going to be easy enough to cover.  I was concerned that this nomination came along at a time when I didn't have much free time to spend here, but now I can spend a little time digging away on it.    Some of the talk comments make my blood boil - especially the ones that obstinately press on with their illogical rants despite the fact that they have no evidence, knowledge or experience to support their absurd viewpoints ;-)  I don't comprehend Holocaust denial, I truly don't.  Best I don't get started on that subject!  cheers  +++$+++ :Hi again Tvoz.  With regards to sourcing - I have two biographies (Melissa Muller & Carol Lee) which both cover very similar territory and can be used to cover Anne's life.  They're both very good.   Also a book from the Anne Frank House, which is a fairly slim paperback, but has some good things, plus a fantastic book about the house, which has heaps of good things.   So I think her life is going to be easy enough to cover.  I was concerned that this nomination came along at a time when I didn't have much free time to spend here, but now I can spend a little time digging away on it.    Some of the talk comments make my blood boil - especially the ones that obstinately press on with their illogical rants despite the fact that they have no evidence, knowledge or experience to support their absurd viewpoints ;-)  I don't comprehend Holocaust denial, I truly don't.  Best I don't get started on that subject!  cheers [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] ([[User talk:Rossrs|talk]]) 07:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
284832 +++$+++ Rossrs +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284830 +++$+++ 284831 +++$+++ 2007-11-28 07:32:00 +++$+++ 1.196263920E09 +++$+++ Aah!  Then you should appreciate [[June Pointer#Death]].  I was going to edit it, but I was so moved, I couldn't stop sobbing.  I don't mean to be flippant about something that is genuinely sad, but don't you think that must have been some huge deathbed?   Poor June, as if she didn't have enough problems, she had to endure being embraced by an octopus.  +++$+++ ::Aah!  Then you should appreciate [[June Pointer#Death]].  I was going to edit it, but I was so moved, I couldn't stop sobbing.  I don't mean to be flippant about something that is genuinely sad, but don't you think that must have been some huge deathbed?   Poor June, as if she didn't have enough problems, she had to endure being embraced by an octopus. [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] ([[User talk:Rossrs|talk]]) 07:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

546975 +++$+++ Ser Amantio di Nicolao +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546975 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-10 18:09:00 +++$+++ 1.255223340E09 +++$+++ Thanks for the suggestion - I'll take it into account when I pick it up again today. --<font face=\"Old English Text MT\"> +++$+++ Thanks for the suggestion - I'll take it into account when I pick it up again today. --<font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|Ser Amantio di Nicolao]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|''Che dicono a Signa?'']]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ser Amantio di Nicolao|'''Lo dicono a Signa.''']]</sub> 18:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
546976 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546975 +++$+++ 546975 +++$+++ 2009-10-11 10:09:00 +++$+++ 1.255280940E09 +++$+++ Your welcome. Good luck with the articles. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Your welcome. Good luck with the articles. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 10:09, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

22688 +++$+++ Metzujan +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22688 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-05-31 14:27:00 +++$+++ 1.243805220E09 +++$+++ Hi GidonB. Could you take a look at the talk page [[Talk:List of Dutch Jews]]. Waarom de opname van niet-joden? Thanks,  +++$+++ Hi GidonB. Could you take a look at the talk page [[Talk:List of Dutch Jews]]. Waarom de opname van niet-joden? Thanks, [[User:Metzujan|Metzujan]] ([[User talk:Metzujan|talk]]) 14:27, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
22689 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22688 +++$+++ 22688 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 15:06:00 +++$+++ 1.243807560E09 +++$+++ Hi Metzujan! Thank you for drawing my attention to the new issues with VKing on this list. He has been banned from nl.wiki for edit warring, hate speech, copyvio violations, lying about them and pushing a fringe right-wing agenda. See [http:\/\/nl.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Overleg_gebruiker:VKing] and [http:\/\/nl.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Verzoekpagina_voor_moderatoren\/RegBlok\/VKing] for more details. It is sad news that he has just started to \"improve\" this list. As for the inclusion and formatting question. Other formats than this one are possible but more complicated to implement. Please do not view this list as detached from similar other lists. BTW I would love to chat sometime and exchange Wikipedia experiences. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Metzujan! Thank you for drawing my attention to the new issues with VKing on this list. He has been banned from nl.wiki for edit warring, hate speech, copyvio violations, lying about them and pushing a fringe right-wing agenda. See [http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overleg_gebruiker:VKing] and [http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verzoekpagina_voor_moderatoren/RegBlok/VKing] for more details. It is sad news that he has just started to "improve" this list. As for the inclusion and formatting question. Other formats than this one are possible but more complicated to implement. Please do not view this list as detached from similar other lists. BTW I would love to chat sometime and exchange Wikipedia experiences. Regards, [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 15:06, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
22690 +++$+++ Metzujan +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22688 +++$+++ 22689 +++$+++ 2009-05-31 15:39:00 +++$+++ 1.243809540E09 +++$+++ By all means... I have already noticed that we have encountered the same problems, in particular relating to Jewish topics, see [http:\/\/nl.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Joodse_maanden here] and [http:\/\/nl.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Joodse_maanden&oldid=3599700 here] and the spelling of shabbat (it's one of my top priorities to tackle). For almost 3 years clearly wrong information was not corrected. But it can be even worse. Since 2005 till very recently you could find a painful wrong explanation of [http:\/\/nl.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Mazzeltov&oldid=2719539 this] word. Enough to be done, and slowly but surely the problems are being solved. <p>As for the above mentioned user, thank you for the relevant feedback. I wasn't aware of his background hence my polite explanation of his rather racial view, which brought me back to memories of my college friends who also had their own \"particular\" view on the holocaust, and jews. Never a dull moment.  +++$+++ ::By all means... I have already noticed that we have encountered the same problems, in particular relating to Jewish topics, see [http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joodse_maanden here] and [http://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joodse_maanden&oldid=3599700 here] and the spelling of shabbat (it's one of my top priorities to tackle). For almost 3 years clearly wrong information was not corrected. But it can be even worse. Since 2005 till very recently you could find a painful wrong explanation of [http://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mazzeltov&oldid=2719539 this] word. Enough to be done, and slowly but surely the problems are being solved. <p>As for the above mentioned user, thank you for the relevant feedback. I wasn't aware of his background hence my polite explanation of his rather racial view, which brought me back to memories of my college friends who also had their own "particular" view on the holocaust, and jews. Never a dull moment. [[User:Metzujan|Metzujan]] ([[User talk:Metzujan|talk]]) 15:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
22691 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22688 +++$+++ 22690 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 13:50:00 +++$+++ 1.245703800E09 +++$+++ The Dutch Wikipedia is a mess. I am so glad I am here. Used to get lots of requests to return or contribute, as many of the better editors have left. I think they should not worry about this or that editor but improve the way people interact and whether fringe or moderate writers get the upper hand. One of the biggest pains for Judaism-related content on nl.wiki is a person who keeps adding evangelical, messianic, self-invented, and misunderstood content to Jewish articles. You gave an example that I did detect. They forgive him, as he does trivial editing work around the clock. Jewish content is thus sacrificed for the general good. But the \"general\" was not so good either. There were similar issues in many content areas, people who take ownership over articles, self-proclaimed experts, endless warring,  discussions that never get to the point, random bans, bad interpersonal relations, discrimination, racism, etc. Sometimes, like in the case you raise above, there is even overflow to en.wiki. You know, I have not lived much in the Netherlands, but sometimes I get the feeling that this reflects society in the Netherlands. I hope it isn't true. En.wiki, with some occasional stress in the highly contentious subject matter areas that I edit here, is really an antithesis to the Dutch Wikipedia.  +++$+++ :::The Dutch Wikipedia is a mess. I am so glad I am here. Used to get lots of requests to return or contribute, as many of the better editors have left. I think they should not worry about this or that editor but improve the way people interact and whether fringe or moderate writers get the upper hand. One of the biggest pains for Judaism-related content on nl.wiki is a person who keeps adding evangelical, messianic, self-invented, and misunderstood content to Jewish articles. You gave an example that I did detect. They forgive him, as he does trivial editing work around the clock. Jewish content is thus sacrificed for the general good. But the "general" was not so good either. There were similar issues in many content areas, people who take ownership over articles, self-proclaimed experts, endless warring,  discussions that never get to the point, random bans, bad interpersonal relations, discrimination, racism, etc. Sometimes, like in the case you raise above, there is even overflow to en.wiki. You know, I have not lived much in the Netherlands, but sometimes I get the feeling that this reflects society in the Netherlands. I hope it isn't true. En.wiki, with some occasional stress in the highly contentious subject matter areas that I edit here, is really an antithesis to the Dutch Wikipedia. [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 13:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
22692 +++$+++ Metzujan +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22688 +++$+++ 22691 +++$+++ 2009-07-29 11:37:00 +++$+++ 1.248892620E09 +++$+++ I also started yiddish acticles like [[nl:Hoteldebotel]], [[nl:Koefnoen (uitdrukking)]], [[nl:Tacheles]], [[nl:Gannef]] and I have created and am working on [[nl:Categorie:Jiddisch]], by adding new articles and I am planning on starting a portal as well. As for other jewish topics, I find it hard that like [[nl:Sjabbatkaarsen]], [[nl:Jitschak Abarbanel]], [[nl:Isra\xebl in de Davis Cup]] or [[nl:Jiddisch van A tot Z]] and many others there is no input from others whatsoever. Maybe that's the key difference with the English Wikipedia, there are many more people here that are contributing on these topics. I hope to become more active here as well, probabely in a month orso. Kol tuv!  +++$+++ ::::I also started yiddish acticles like [[nl:Hoteldebotel]], [[nl:Koefnoen (uitdrukking)]], [[nl:Tacheles]], [[nl:Gannef]] and I have created and am working on [[nl:Categorie:Jiddisch]], by adding new articles and I am planning on starting a portal as well. As for other jewish topics, I find it hard that like [[nl:Sjabbatkaarsen]], [[nl:Jitschak Abarbanel]], [[nl:Israël in de Davis Cup]] or [[nl:Jiddisch van A tot Z]] and many others there is no input from others whatsoever. Maybe that's the key difference with the English Wikipedia, there are many more people here that are contributing on these topics. I hope to become more active here as well, probabely in a month orso. Kol tuv! [[User:Metzujan|Metzujan]] ([[User talk:Metzujan|talk]]) 11:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
22693 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22688 +++$+++ 22689 +++$+++ 2009-06-02 02:45:00 +++$+++ 1.243935900E09 +++$+++ Hello 130.253.134.34, please see the answer by Polaron in the edit history of the article.  +++$+++ ::Hello 130.253.134.34, please see the answer by Polaron in the edit history of the article. [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 02:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

546977 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546977 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-14 14:04:00 +++$+++ 1.255554240E09 +++$+++ Since you are somewhat involved with this, I wanted to let you know that this is now at [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Incidents#Copyright_concerns.2C_User:Pr3st0n|ANI]]. -- +++$+++ Since you are somewhat involved with this, I wanted to let you know that this is now at [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Copyright_concerns.2C_User:Pr3st0n|ANI]]. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 14:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
546978 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546977 +++$+++ 546977 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.255554600E09 +++$+++ Okay. Wow. I was just this moment starting to delete the first three since they are admittedly and unambiguously Coyright vios. Should I wait while the ANI case ensues?<span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Okay. Wow. I was just this moment starting to delete the first three since they are admittedly and unambiguously Coyright vios. Should I wait while the ANI case ensues?<span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:10, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
546979 +++$+++ Moonriddengirl +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546977 +++$+++ 546978 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 14:10:00 +++$+++ 1.255554600E09 +++$+++ I think the first three are safe to delete. The ones I would keep are the ones that may constitute copyright fraud. -- +++$+++ ::I think the first three are safe to delete. The ones I would keep are the ones that may constitute copyright fraud. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 14:10, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
546980 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546977 +++$+++ 546979 +++$+++ 2009-10-14 14:12:00 +++$+++ 1.255554720E09 +++$+++ Got it. Thanks.<span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Got it. Thanks.<span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

284836 +++$+++ Tonywalton +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284836 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-03 16:05:00 +++$+++ 1.196726700E09 +++$+++ I wandered about the room going \"gaaahhh...\" for a while after I discovered <nowiki>[[foo(bar)|]]<\/nowiki>.  [[Help:Pipe trick]] is an interesting place...   +++$+++ I wandered about the room going "gaaahhh..." for a while after I discovered <nowiki>[[foo(bar)|]]</nowiki>.  [[Help:Pipe trick]] is an interesting place...  [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 16:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
284837 +++$+++ Tonywalton +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284836 +++$+++ 284836 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 16:20:00 +++$+++ 1.196727600E09 +++$+++ I ''think'' it's trying to say \"if you're on page 'blah' then <nowiki>[[\/foo\/]]<\/nowiki> becomes <nowiki>[[blah\/foo|foo]]<\/nowiki>. Or something. Think I'll try a bit of experimentation!  +++$+++ :I ''think'' it's trying to say "if you're on page 'blah' then <nowiki>[[/foo/]]</nowiki> becomes <nowiki>[[blah/foo|foo]]</nowiki>. Or something. Think I'll try a bit of experimentation! [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 16:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
284838 +++$+++ Tonywalton +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284836 +++$+++ 284837 +++$+++ 2007-12-03 16:28:00 +++$+++ 1.196728080E09 +++$+++ Yup. That's it. See [[User:Tonywalton\/Subpage|Tonywalton\/Subpage]]. Not ''that'' useful, especially in mainspace, but cool nonetheless.  +++$+++ ::Yup. That's it. See [[User:Tonywalton/Subpage|Tonywalton/Subpage]]. Not ''that'' useful, especially in mainspace, but cool nonetheless. [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 16:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
284839 +++$+++ Tonywalton +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284836 +++$+++ 284838 +++$+++ 2007-12-05 18:21:00 +++$+++ 1.196907660E09 +++$+++ Hmmm. I quite like \"[[Selene]] bless [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]]\" (us [[pagan]]s can be picky ;) )  +++$+++ :::Hmmm. I quite like "[[Selene]] bless [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]]" (us [[pagan]]s can be picky ;) ) [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</sup> 18:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

546981 +++$+++ Frank +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546981 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-16 14:46:00 +++$+++ 1.255729560E09 +++$+++ On a related note, do you mean [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard\/Incidents&diff=320202640&oldid=320202327 \"do\"] or \"do not\"? <small><span style=\"padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000\"> +++$+++ On a related note, do you mean [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=320202640&oldid=320202327 "do"] or "do not"? <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">[[User:Frank|<span style="color:cyan;background:blue">&nbsp;Frank&nbsp;</span>]]&nbsp;{{!}}&nbsp;[[user_talk:Frank|<span style="color:blue;background:cyan">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 14:46, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
546982 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546981 +++$+++ 546981 +++$+++ 2009-10-16 14:52:00 +++$+++ 1.255729920E09 +++$+++ Oops. Thanks for catching that, Frank. It was most definitely a \"do not\". <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Oops. Thanks for catching that, Frank. It was most definitely a "do not". <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

22694 +++$+++ Shir-El too +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22694 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-21 23:20:00 +++$+++ 1.245651600E09 +++$+++ I am a sporadic copy editor and still learning my way around. Ariel*Gold is my mentor, and I would like to be able to call on someone like you as the need arises. For example: I question the neutrality and accuracy of the [[Catherine the Great]] article, but don't know how to 'tag' it. Thank you,  +++$+++ I am a sporadic copy editor and still learning my way around. Ariel*Gold is my mentor, and I would like to be able to call on someone like you as the need arises. For example: I question the neutrality and accuracy of the [[Catherine the Great]] article, but don't know how to 'tag' it. Thank you, [[User:Shir-El too|<font color="F64A8A">'''''Shir-El'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Shir-El too|<font color="DF73FF">''too''</font>]] 23:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
22695 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22694 +++$+++ 22694 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 01:53:00 +++$+++ 1.245660780E09 +++$+++ Hi Shir-El. You may ask me questions. If your concerns with the article are this serious, adding the <nowiki>{{npov}} template is the most straightforward solution. Be sure to write in some detail on the talk page why you believe that the article is biased and inaccurate. Do consider the following alternatives, however. Rewriting and improving the sections you are unhappy with, while using the references on which you base your knowledge, is a more constructive approach to the problems that you encountered. Another approach is adding {{refimprove}} on top and using templates such as {{fact}} and {{who}}<\/nowiki> in the text, while deleting some real nonsense. This approach directs the reader and other editors directly to the sections that need improvement and is attractive, for example, for articles of mixed qualities. You can also use tags now and improve later. It really depends on your judgement. Regards,  +++$+++ :Hi Shir-El. You may ask me questions. If your concerns with the article are this serious, adding the <nowiki>{{npov}} template is the most straightforward solution. Be sure to write in some detail on the talk page why you believe that the article is biased and inaccurate. Do consider the following alternatives, however. Rewriting and improving the sections you are unhappy with, while using the references on which you base your knowledge, is a more constructive approach to the problems that you encountered. Another approach is adding {{refimprove}} on top and using templates such as {{fact}} and {{who}}</nowiki> in the text, while deleting some real nonsense. This approach directs the reader and other editors directly to the sections that need improvement and is attractive, for example, for articles of mixed qualities. You can also use tags now and improve later. It really depends on your judgement. Regards, [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 01:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

546983 +++$+++ Spongefrog +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546983 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-21 14:34:00 +++$+++ 1.256160840E09 +++$+++ Thankyou deleting all my subpages, [[User:Spongefrog|<font color=\"Green\" face=\"High Tower Text\">'''Lord Spongefrog'''<\/font>]] +++$+++ Thankyou deleting all my subpages, [[User:Spongefrog|<font color="Green" face="High Tower Text">'''Lord Spongefrog'''</font>]][[User:Spongefrog/Subpage/My Barnstars|,]] [[User talk:Spongefrog#top|<font color="blue" face="High Tower Text">(I am the Czar of all Russias!)</font>]] 14:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
546984 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546983 +++$+++ 546983 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 14:37:00 +++$+++ 1.256161020E09 +++$+++ You're welcome. Happy housecleaning. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :You're welcome. Happy housecleaning. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 14:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
546985 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546983 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-10-21 20:59:00 +++$+++ 1.256183940E09 +++$+++ Ah, good to know. I can stop trying to find the Venusian translator on Google. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Ah, good to know. I can stop trying to find the Venusian translator on Google. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 20:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

22696 +++$+++ Shir-El too +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22696 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-06-22 19:37:00 +++$+++ 1.245724620E09 +++$+++ Thank you! I hope to do all of the above at a later date. My view of Catherine is largely predicated on Henry Troyat's biography of her, which means that I may also be biased. However some ''facts'' do stand out: that she founded the first vocational schools for orphans, the first institute of higher education for daughters of the aristocracy, and circumvented controversy, superstition and political intrigue to introduced mandatory smallpox vaccination into Russia by - having herself inoculated first! Thank you again, and have a good one!  +++$+++ Thank you! I hope to do all of the above at a later date. My view of Catherine is largely predicated on Henry Troyat's biography of her, which means that I may also be biased. However some ''facts'' do stand out: that she founded the first vocational schools for orphans, the first institute of higher education for daughters of the aristocracy, and circumvented controversy, superstition and political intrigue to introduced mandatory smallpox vaccination into Russia by - having herself inoculated first! Thank you again, and have a good one! [[User:Shir-El too|<font color="F64A8A">'''''Shir-El'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Shir-El too|<font color="DF73FF">''too''</font>]] 19:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
22697 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22696 +++$+++ 22696 +++$+++ 2009-06-22 20:10:00 +++$+++ 1.245726600E09 +++$+++ You are welcome and good luck!  +++$+++ :You are welcome and good luck! [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 20:10, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

22698 +++$+++ StephenBuxton +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22698 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-06 09:24:00 +++$+++ 1.246897440E09 +++$+++ Sorry for not responding to your request on my talk page; I have been away from my PC for the past month, so was unable to deal with anything.  I'm glad it has been resolved for you, I'm just sorry that I wasn't able to help you out. ''' +++$+++ Sorry for not responding to your request on my talk page; I have been away from my PC for the past month, so was unable to deal with anything.  I'm glad it has been resolved for you, I'm just sorry that I wasn't able to help you out. '''[[User:StephenBuxton|Stephen!]]''' <sup><small>''[[User talk:StephenBuxton|Coming...]]''</small></sup> 09:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
22699 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22698 +++$+++ 22698 +++$+++ 2009-07-06 10:04:00 +++$+++ 1.246899840E09 +++$+++ Hello Stephen, no problem! Hope you had a good wiki-vacation! Thanks for getting back to me. Working on the synagogues of Illinois is a longterm project I undertake, so no worries! Best regards,  +++$+++ :Hello Stephen, no problem! Hope you had a good wiki-vacation! Thanks for getting back to me. Working on the synagogues of Illinois is a longterm project I undertake, so no worries! Best regards, [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 10:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

284843 +++$+++ BoogaLouie +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284843 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-04 18:44:00 +++$+++ 1.196822640E09 +++$+++ Please reply to discussion. http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal\/Cases\/2007-11-29_Cat_Stevens -- +++$+++ Please reply to discussion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2007-11-29_Cat_Stevens --[[User:BoogaLouie|BoogaLouie]] 18:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
284844 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284843 +++$+++ 284843 +++$+++ 2007-12-08 04:29:00 +++$+++ 1.197116940E09 +++$+++ I knew that!  And I almost remembered!!  thanks <strong> +++$+++ :I knew that!  And I almost remembered!!  thanks <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 04:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

22700 +++$+++ Shir-El too +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22700 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-14 23:42:00 +++$+++ 1.247640120E09 +++$+++ Cannot get the [7] reference\/link right on [[Ladyhawke]]. I'm missing something, but what? Thank you,  +++$+++ Cannot get the [7] reference/link right on [[Ladyhawke]]. I'm missing something, but what? Thank you, [[User:Shir-El too|<font color="F64A8A">'''''Shir-El'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Shir-El too|<font color="DF73FF">''too''</font>]] 23:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
22701 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22700 +++$+++ 22700 +++$+++ 2009-07-15 09:29:00 +++$+++ 1.247675340E09 +++$+++ You were missing a title. I also simplified the URL. Welcome,  +++$+++ :You were missing a title. I also simplified the URL. Welcome, [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 09:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

571762 +++$+++ Springeragh +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571762 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-08-19 23:34:00 +++$+++ 1.187591640E09 +++$+++ Thorry to hear about your keyboard, mate. Are you going to get it fixed? (Thorry, I have thith thtrange knack of alwayth wanting to make a joke about bad circumthtanceth. Uthually I can keep mythelf from it but pardon me thith time ath I can't rethitht it.) ;) &mdash;  +++$+++ Thorry to hear about your keyboard, mate. Are you going to get it fixed? (Thorry, I have thith thtrange knack of alwayth wanting to make a joke about bad circumthtanceth. Uthually I can keep mythelf from it but pardon me thith time ath I can't rethitht it.) ;) &mdash; [[User talk:Springeragh|<span style="background:#808;color:#fff;text-decoration:none;">&nbsp;'''''$PЯING'''''εrαgђ&nbsp;</span>]] 23:34, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
571763 +++$+++ DarkFalls +++$+++ Dfrg.msc +++$+++ 571762 +++$+++ 571762 +++$+++ 2007-08-20 09:58:00 +++$+++ 1.187629080E09 +++$+++ Me think you can't 'pell and me it goody pelr... -- +++$+++ :Me think you can't 'pell and me it goody pelr... --[[User:DarkFalls|<strong><font color="black" face="Comic Sans Ms">Dark<font color="green">Falls</font></font></strong>]] <sup>[[User talk:DarkFalls|talk]]</sup> 09:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

22702 +++$+++ Kulystab +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22702 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-07-18 11:39:00 +++$+++ 1.247942340E09 +++$+++ Many Thanks,  +++$+++ Many Thanks, [[User:Kulystab|Kulystab]] ([[User talk:Kulystab|talk]]) 11:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
22703 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22702 +++$+++ 22702 +++$+++ 2009-07-18 12:05:00 +++$+++ 1.247943900E09 +++$+++ Done.  +++$+++ :Done. [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 12:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

284847 +++$+++ Wordbuilder +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284847 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-12 17:16:00 +++$+++ 1.197508560E09 +++$+++ Please direct me to the Wikipedia guideline supporting [http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Sandra_Scheuer&diff=177384324&oldid=177286867 your reversion] of my edit. Thanks! \u2192 +++$+++ Please direct me to the Wikipedia guideline supporting [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sandra_Scheuer&diff=177384324&oldid=177286867 your reversion] of my edit. Thanks! →[[User:Wordbuilder|Wordbuilder]] ([[User talk:Wordbuilder|talk]]) 17:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
284848 +++$+++ Wordbuilder +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284847 +++$+++ 284847 +++$+++ 2007-12-12 18:20:00 +++$+++ 1.197512400E09 +++$+++ Thank you for your reply. Let me know what you find out. I'm still trying to learn all the guidelines and this is one I had not heard of before. \u2192 +++$+++ :Thank you for your reply. Let me know what you find out. I'm still trying to learn all the guidelines and this is one I had not heard of before. →[[User:Wordbuilder|Wordbuilder]] ([[User talk:Wordbuilder|talk]]) 18:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
284849 +++$+++ Wordbuilder +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284847 +++$+++ 284848 +++$+++ 2007-12-14 22:59:00 +++$+++ 1.197701940E09 +++$+++ Excellent. I had been doing it wrong. \u2192 +++$+++ ::Excellent. I had been doing it wrong. →[[User:Wordbuilder|Wordbuilder]] ([[User talk:Wordbuilder|talk]]) 22:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

541348 +++$+++ Caponer +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541348 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-04-06 13:32:00 +++$+++ 1.239049920E09 +++$+++ Hey Carlos, I just happened to check my watchlist and noticed that several categories I created were nominated for deletion. The categories in question were for American political families. While no consensus was reached and the categories were spared, I would have liked to have been messaged to be alerted of the discussion so I could have weighed in. The purpose of the political family categories was to connect all articles that pertain to respective families. These were relatively new, but a good example of such a category is Category:Mason family. It's a little more robust, perhaps to your liking.-- +++$+++ Hey Carlos, I just happened to check my watchlist and noticed that several categories I created were nominated for deletion. The categories in question were for American political families. While no consensus was reached and the categories were spared, I would have liked to have been messaged to be alerted of the discussion so I could have weighed in. The purpose of the political family categories was to connect all articles that pertain to respective families. These were relatively new, but a good example of such a category is Category:Mason family. It's a little more robust, perhaps to your liking.--[[User:Caponer|Caponer]] ([[User talk:Caponer|talk]]) 13:32, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
541349 +++$+++ Caponer +++$+++ Carlossuarez46 +++$+++ 541348 +++$+++ 541348 +++$+++ 2009-04-06 22:14:00 +++$+++ 1.239081240E09 +++$+++ Carlos, thank you for your response.  I definitely concur that templates give the article much more context for why it belongs, but why can't we have our cake (templates) and eat it (categories), too? :) -- +++$+++ : Carlos, thank you for your response.  I definitely concur that templates give the article much more context for why it belongs, but why can't we have our cake (templates) and eat it (categories), too? :) --[[User:Caponer|Caponer]] ([[User talk:Caponer|talk]]) 22:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

22705 +++$+++ Shirulashem +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22705 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-09-22 03:18:00 +++$+++ 1.253614680E09 +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised.  Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}<\/code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed Deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy Deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning -->  +++$+++ Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised.  Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed Deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy Deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Shirulashem|'''<span style="font-family:cursive;color:#2B3856">-shirulashem</span>''']]<sup>[[User talk:Shirulashem|<span style="font-family:cursive;color:#2B3856">(talk)</span>]]</sup> 03:18, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
22706 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22705 +++$+++ 22705 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 01:12:00 +++$+++ 1.257844320E09 +++$+++ ''Comment. I created this article as a redirect to eliminate red links. Later an article was created which lacked substance. The prodding prompted the restoring of my redirect.''  +++$+++ :''Comment. I created this article as a redirect to eliminate red links. Later an article was created which lacked substance. The prodding prompted the restoring of my redirect.'' [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 01:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

22707 +++$+++ Shir-El too +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22707 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-10 00:48:00 +++$+++ 1.257842880E09 +++$+++ I feel strongly that this person is attempting to use the rules to manipulate the situation, but in all fairness I would like a second opinion from someone more knowledgable, outside the debate. Please let me know what you think, or whether you know someone I could refer this question to. {I would ask my mentor, but she is absent.} Thanking you in advance,  +++$+++ I feel strongly that this person is attempting to use the rules to manipulate the situation, but in all fairness I would like a second opinion from someone more knowledgable, outside the debate. Please let me know what you think, or whether you know someone I could refer this question to. {I would ask my mentor, but she is absent.} Thanking you in advance, [[User:Shir-El too|<font color="F64A8A">'''''Shir-El'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Shir-El too|<font color="DF73FF">''too''</font>]] 00:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
22708 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22707 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-10 01:07:00 +++$+++ 1.257844020E09 +++$+++ Hi Shir-El, can you point me the page where the discussion was held? Best,  +++$+++ :::Hi Shir-El, can you point me the page where the discussion was held? Best, [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 01:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
22709 +++$+++ Shir-El too +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22707 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 07:37:00 +++$+++ 1.257953820E09 +++$+++ It was mostly held here [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music]] and on our various talk pages, but I am happy to say it has since been resloved. I would appreciate your opinion anyway - as opposed to any form of action - so I'll know better next time. Thank you!  +++$+++ ::::It was mostly held here [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music]] and on our various talk pages, but I am happy to say it has since been resloved. I would appreciate your opinion anyway - as opposed to any form of action - so I'll know better next time. Thank you! [[User:Shir-El too|<font color="F64A8A">'''''Shir-El'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Shir-El too|<font color="DF73FF">''too''</font>]] 07:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
22710 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22707 +++$+++ -1 +++$+++ 2009-11-11 13:47:00 +++$+++ 1.257976020E09 +++$+++ It's difficult to form an opinion right now and not very necessary if the differences were resolved. The title you gave to this discussion however was I need advise. I can give you some advise. As an editor of your own talk page, you can considerably improve the tone and increase the topical focus of the exchange by replacing user-chosen headers into the names of the Wikipedia pages which are the basis for the discussion. It also makes discussions easier to follow for an occasional outsider who takes interest.  +++$+++ :::::It's difficult to form an opinion right now and not very necessary if the differences were resolved. The title you gave to this discussion however was I need advise. I can give you some advise. As an editor of your own talk page, you can considerably improve the tone and increase the topical focus of the exchange by replacing user-chosen headers into the names of the Wikipedia pages which are the basis for the discussion. It also makes discussions easier to follow for an occasional outsider who takes interest. [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 13:47, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

546997 +++$+++ Alisha208 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546997 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-28 12:46:00 +++$+++ 1.256759160E09 +++$+++ Hi, as you have mentioned in my talk page that the image I uploaded will be deleted, could you please help me out? Actually, I haven't really understood what exactly I have to speciy about on the file description page.Please reply.  +++$+++ Hi, as you have mentioned in my talk page that the image I uploaded will be deleted, could you please help me out? Actually, I haven't really understood what exactly I have to speciy about on the file description page.Please reply. [[User:Alisha208|Alisha208]] ([[User talk:Alisha208|talk]]) 12:46, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
546998 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546997 +++$+++ 546997 +++$+++ 2009-10-28 13:20:00 +++$+++ 1.256761200E09 +++$+++ Secondly, the article [[Kya Mast Hai Life]] already contains a non-free picture which serves the same purpose as the one that you wish to add. Therefore, there is no good rationale for keeping the second photo and it will need to be deleted. Regards. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Secondly, the article [[Kya Mast Hai Life]] already contains a non-free picture which serves the same purpose as the one that you wish to add. Therefore, there is no good rationale for keeping the second photo and it will need to be deleted. Regards. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 13:20, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
546999 +++$+++ Alisha208 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546997 +++$+++ 546998 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 07:28:00 +++$+++ 1.256912880E09 +++$+++ Hi, and thanks for helping me out. But does that mean that the image will be deleted from the article [[List of Kya Mast Hai Life characters]] too? I think that that image is needed there, because it does describe the subject of the article. Please do take a look at that page too. Thanks! +++$+++ ::Hi, and thanks for helping me out. But does that mean that the image will be deleted from the article [[List of Kya Mast Hai Life characters]] too? I think that that image is needed there, because it does describe the subject of the article. Please do take a look at that page too. Thanks![[User:Alisha208|Alisha208]] ([[User talk:Alisha208|talk]]) 07:28, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
547000 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 546997 +++$+++ 546999 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 08:53:00 +++$+++ 1.256917980E09 +++$+++ Yes, the photo will be eliminated from the list article too. The reasoning is: if a single non-free photo serves the function of identifying the characters in the main article (like [[:File:Kyamasthailife.jpg]] does), it can also serve that purpose in the list article. A new non-free photo should not be used without a very strong rationale. You can read the guidelines for this at [[WP:NFLISTS]]. If you wish to get more input about this from other editors, you can always leave a message at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. There are knowledgeable editors there who may be able to give you additional help. Good luck. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::Yes, the photo will be eliminated from the list article too. The reasoning is: if a single non-free photo serves the function of identifying the characters in the main article (like [[:File:Kyamasthailife.jpg]] does), it can also serve that purpose in the list article. A new non-free photo should not be used without a very strong rationale. You can read the guidelines for this at [[WP:NFLISTS]]. If you wish to get more input about this from other editors, you can always leave a message at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. There are knowledgeable editors there who may be able to give you additional help. Good luck. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 08:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

22711 +++$+++ Eddau +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22711 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-11-23 16:51:00 +++$+++ 1.259023860E09 +++$+++  +++$+++ [[User:Eddau|Eddau]] ([[User talk:Eddau|talk]]) 16:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
22712 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22711 +++$+++ 22711 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 02:10:00 +++$+++ 1.261044600E09 +++$+++ Eddau, I have improved the article. I would appreciate if you take time to look at the referencing and improve your references next time you write an article.  +++$+++ : Eddau, I have improved the article. I would appreciate if you take time to look at the referencing and improve your references next time you write an article. [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 02:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

284856 +++$+++ Cool Hand Luke +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284856 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2007-12-17 06:35:00 +++$+++ 1.197902100E09 +++$+++ You and Ferrylodge seem to have some history. Please keep your comments directed toward the contribution and not the contributer, [[WP:CIVIL]]. Consider this a warning. I've given a similar message to Ferrylodge as well.  +++$+++ You and Ferrylodge seem to have some history. Please keep your comments directed toward the contribution and not the contributer, [[WP:CIVIL]]. Consider this a warning. I've given a similar message to Ferrylodge as well. [[User:Cool Hand Luke|Cool Hand]] ''[[User talk:Cool Hand Luke|Luke]]'' 06:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
284857 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284856 +++$+++ 284856 +++$+++ 2007-12-17 09:18:00 +++$+++ 1.197911880E09 +++$+++ I make it a habit of not opening conversations with Ferrylodge - my comments to him on [[Talk: Mitt Romney]]  are content responses to his content points,  except when he has directed his comments at me personally, in which case I responded accordingly,  leaving him to have the last word so that it ends. Being attacked and responding to it is not the same thing as initiating personal attacks.  <strong> +++$+++ :I make it a habit of not opening conversations with Ferrylodge - my comments to him on [[Talk: Mitt Romney]]  are content responses to his content points,  except when he has directed his comments at me personally, in which case I responded accordingly,  leaving him to have the last word so that it ends. Being attacked and responding to it is not the same thing as initiating personal attacks.  <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 09:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
284858 +++$+++ Cool Hand Luke +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284856 +++$+++ 284856 +++$+++ 2007-12-27 20:03:00 +++$+++ 1.198814580E09 +++$+++ Given the context of this dispute (which I did not previously understand), I feel this warning should not count as any kind of black mark against this [[User:Tvos]]. In the future, I advise user to delete, ignore, or {{tl|hat}} incivility in the rather than respond to it.  +++$+++ :Given the context of this dispute (which I did not previously understand), I feel this warning should not count as any kind of black mark against this [[User:Tvos]]. In the future, I advise user to delete, ignore, or {{tl|hat}} incivility in the rather than respond to it. [[User:Cool Hand Luke|Cool Hand]] ''[[User talk:Cool Hand Luke|Luke]]'' 20:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

22713 +++$+++ Eddau +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22713 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-12-17 01:45:00 +++$+++ 1.261043100E09 +++$+++ [[:Category talk:Palestinian Roman Catholic saints]] +++$+++ [[:Category talk:Palestinian Roman Catholic saints]][[User:Eddau|Eddau]] ([[User talk:Eddau|talk]]) 01:45, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
22714 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22713 +++$+++ 22713 +++$+++ 2009-12-17 02:11:00 +++$+++ 1.261044660E09 +++$+++ I have seen it.  +++$+++ :I have seen it. [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 02:11, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

547002 +++$+++ Bfigura +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 547002 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-30 18:08:00 +++$+++ 1.256951280E09 +++$+++ Hi. I noticed you were involved in [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations\/Montreux69\/Archive]], and the same socks there seem to have cropped up again. Rightly or wrongly, the place with the most information now seems to be an AfD: [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Strutt_Family_Trust]]. Would you mind taking a look and seeing if anything seems familiar to you. Best, -- +++$+++ Hi. I noticed you were involved in [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Montreux69/Archive]], and the same socks there seem to have cropped up again. Rightly or wrongly, the place with the most information now seems to be an AfD: [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Strutt_Family_Trust]]. Would you mind taking a look and seeing if anything seems familiar to you. Best, --[[User:Bfigura|<font color="Green">'''B'''</font><font color="Blue">figura</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bfigura|talk]])</sup> 18:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
547003 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 547002 +++$+++ 547002 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 21:07:00 +++$+++ 1.256962020E09 +++$+++ Sorry, it took me a little while to recall the case. I had to review it. But you are absolutely correct -- a lovely little sock farm pushing the new hoax articles. I have opened an SPI case at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations\/Montreux69]]. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Sorry, it took me a little while to recall the case. I had to review it. But you are absolutely correct -- a lovely little sock farm pushing the new hoax articles. I have opened an SPI case at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Montreux69]]. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 21:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
547004 +++$+++ Bfigura +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 547002 +++$+++ 547003 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 21:09:00 +++$+++ 1.256962140E09 +++$+++ Thanks much, I was a bit rusty on remembering how to go about that. Accounting4Taste and I figured that since neither of us remembered how to do it properly, we'd wait until some more came out of the woodwork, or someone else came along. -- +++$+++ ::Thanks much, I was a bit rusty on remembering how to go about that. Accounting4Taste and I figured that since neither of us remembered how to do it properly, we'd wait until some more came out of the woodwork, or someone else came along. --[[User:Bfigura|<font color="Green">'''B'''</font><font color="Blue">figura</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bfigura|talk]])</sup> 21:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
547005 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 547002 +++$+++ 547004 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 21:13:00 +++$+++ 1.256962380E09 +++$+++ That is a flurry of activity. We'll need to do some salting after this. Good job to you and Accounting4Taste for spotting all of it. Thank you. <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :::That is a flurry of activity. We'll need to do some salting after this. Good job to you and Accounting4Taste for spotting all of it. Thank you. <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 21:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
547006 +++$+++ Bfigura +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 547002 +++$+++ 547005 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 21:19:00 +++$+++ 1.256962740E09 +++$+++ Thank you for coming along and helping. The whole process has been somewhat educational for the Accounting4Taste and I. Best, -- +++$+++ ::::Thank you for coming along and helping. The whole process has been somewhat educational for the Accounting4Taste and I. Best, --[[User:Bfigura|<font color="Green">'''B'''</font><font color="Blue">figura</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bfigura|talk]])</sup> 21:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

284859 +++$+++ BetacommandBot +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284859 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-01-02 04:57:00 +++$+++ 1.199278620E09 +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images\/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> +++$+++ If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/media|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 04:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
284860 +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ Tvoz +++$+++ 284859 +++$+++ 284859 +++$+++ 2008-01-03 23:07:00 +++$+++ 1.199430420E09 +++$+++ Hopefully, I did. <strong> +++$+++ :Hopefully, I did. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 23:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

22716 +++$+++ Hekerui +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22716 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2010-01-01 17:12:00 +++$+++ 1.262394720E09 +++$+++ You should nominate [[Same-sex marriage among Native Americans in the United States]] at [[Template talk:Did you know]] so it can appear on the main page. If you want I can do it for you.  +++$+++ You should nominate [[Same-sex marriage among Native Americans in the United States]] at [[Template talk:Did you know]] so it can appear on the main page. If you want I can do it for you. [[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 17:12, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
22717 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22716 +++$+++ 22716 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 18:31:00 +++$+++ 1.262399460E09 +++$+++ Thank you for you kind suggestion and offer. I have never nominated an article that I started for anything but (once) deletion so I would follow your nomination with interest! Best regards,  +++$+++ :Thank you for you kind suggestion and offer. I have never nominated an article that I started for anything but (once) deletion so I would follow your nomination with interest! Best regards, [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 18:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
22718 +++$+++ Hekerui +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22716 +++$+++ 22717 +++$+++ 2010-01-01 19:45:00 +++$+++ 1.262403900E09 +++$+++ So are you doing it or should I? If you've never done it's time to try really.  +++$+++ ::So are you doing it or should I? If you've never done it's time to try really. [[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 19:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
22719 +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22716 +++$+++ 22718 +++$+++ 2010-01-02 16:38:00 +++$+++ 1.262479080E09 +++$+++ Thank you again for your suggestions! I do not wish to ask for any such things ''and'', much more than that, do not wish to tell or even imply what you should do. I am happy to create an encyclopedia with you and all my other colleagues here!  +++$+++ :::Thank you again for your suggestions! I do not wish to ask for any such things ''and'', much more than that, do not wish to tell or even imply what you should do. I am happy to create an encyclopedia with you and all my other colleagues here! [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb#top|talk]]) 16:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
22720 +++$+++ Hekerui +++$+++ Gidonb +++$+++ 22716 +++$+++ 22719 +++$+++ 2010-01-02 23:49:00 +++$+++ 1.262504940E09 +++$+++ I have no clue what you mean but it's the last day and I wrote up something simple.  +++$+++ ::::I have no clue what you mean but it's the last day and I wrote up something simple. [[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 23:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

584993 +++$+++ Cuyler91093 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584993 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2008-02-27 04:31:00 +++$+++ 1.204115460E09 +++$+++ Hi, I am speaking on behalf of [[User:JayJ47|JayJ47]]. He is concerned about the deletion of [[Fergie discography]], and feels (as well as I) that even if Fergie only released one album, the article is still valuable and deserves to be on the pedia. I personally feel so because I feel that even if she only has one album, she will probably release more in the future. Also, it included information about her songs and videos, etc. which are not suited to be placed on the page [[Fergie (singer)]]. At the very least, I would appreciate it if you recover the page and put it in either in my user space or that of [[User:JayJ47|JayJ47]]. Thank you for reading this. I know it's long! Cheers!  +++$+++ Hi, I am speaking on behalf of [[User:JayJ47|JayJ47]]. He is concerned about the deletion of [[Fergie discography]], and feels (as well as I) that even if Fergie only released one album, the article is still valuable and deserves to be on the pedia. I personally feel so because I feel that even if she only has one album, she will probably release more in the future. Also, it included information about her songs and videos, etc. which are not suited to be placed on the page [[Fergie (singer)]]. At the very least, I would appreciate it if you recover the page and put it in either in my user space or that of [[User:JayJ47|JayJ47]]. Thank you for reading this. I know it's long! Cheers! [[User:Cuyler91093|<span style="color:red"><b>Cuyler</b></span>]][[User talk:Cuyler91093|<span style="color:orange"><b>91093</b></span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Cuyler91093|<span style="color:green">Contribs</span>]]) 04:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
584994 +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ Acalamari +++$+++ 584993 +++$+++ 584993 +++$+++ 2008-02-27 17:02:00 +++$+++ 1.204160520E09 +++$+++ Done. See [[User:Cuyler91093\/Fergie discography]].  +++$+++ :Done. See [[User:Cuyler91093/Fergie discography]]. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

547007 +++$+++ Accounting4Taste +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 547007 +++$+++ initial_post +++$+++ 2009-10-30 21:39:00 +++$+++ 1.256963940E09 +++$+++ (exdent for convenience) I'll add my thanks to those of [[User:Bfigura|Bfigura]]; my own admin work rarely brings me into contact with sockpuppet investigations and I am hoping to learn how to be more usefully responsive on the rare occasions that I spot them.  Thanks for taking a firm and rapid hand.   +++$+++ (exdent for convenience) I'll add my thanks to those of [[User:Bfigura|Bfigura]]; my own admin work rarely brings me into contact with sockpuppet investigations and I am hoping to learn how to be more usefully responsive on the rare occasions that I spot them.  Thanks for taking a firm and rapid hand.  [[User:Accounting4Taste|Accounting4Taste]]:<small>[[User talk:Accounting4Taste|talk]]</small> 21:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
547008 +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 547007 +++$+++ 547007 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 21:43:00 +++$+++ 1.256964180E09 +++$+++ Your welcome. The SPI template is kind of confusing -- I have to hit the preview button a lot and then hope the clerks will sort out any mistakes. By the way, as far as the possible reasoning for all this hoaxing effort: the Helen Ann Petrie article was originally created as a history of a great sought-after South African artist and her name was then inserted in various WP articles. It then seemed that someone was trying to sell her paintings on art auction websites. It seems the motive here was to inflate the value of paintings. Your noticing the reference to Helen Ann Petrie was the key here, I believe. Good eyes! <span style=\"font-family: tahoma;\"> \u2014  +++$+++ :Your welcome. The SPI template is kind of confusing -- I have to hit the preview button a lot and then hope the clerks will sort out any mistakes. By the way, as far as the possible reasoning for all this hoaxing effort: the Helen Ann Petrie article was originally created as a history of a great sought-after South African artist and her name was then inserted in various WP articles. It then seemed that someone was trying to sell her paintings on art auction websites. It seems the motive here was to inflate the value of paintings. Your noticing the reference to Helen Ann Petrie was the key here, I believe. Good eyes! <span style="font-family: tahoma;"> — [[User:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000">Cactus</span><span style="color:#CC5500">Writer |</span>]] [[User_talk:CactusWriter|<span style="color:#008000"><sup>needles</sup></span>]]</span> 21:43, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
547009 +++$+++ Accounting4Taste +++$+++ CactusWriter +++$+++ 547007 +++$+++ 547008 +++$+++ 2009-10-30 21:50:00 +++$+++ 1.256964600E09 +++$+++ The good eyes definitely belong to [[User:Bfigura|Bfigura]], I merely knew something was fishy and followed his lead.  But thanks for giving me a sensible reason for all this to have happened; I like things to 